Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2006/08/23 - Agenda Packet
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ~~ ~ AGENDA CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California • I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Fletcher Macias _ McPhail _ Munoz _ II II. ANNOUNCEMENTS ~I II III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES II August 9, 2006 Regular Meeting II IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS II The following items are public hearings m which concerned individuals may voce their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and address the Commission by staling your name and address All such opirnons shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign in after speaking A SECOND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 92 78 acres into 265 lots for single-family home construction The tract is part of a larger project which includes a request for a parcel map and two tentative tract 1 of 5 _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ~~HO AUGUST 23, 2006 cUCAMONGA maps to subdivide 248 63 acres of land into 632 lots for the purpose of single family home construction in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located north of Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0225-071-37, 48, and 50 and 0225-081-08, and 11 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM15699 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in July 2001, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00352 - CINGULAR WIRELESS - A request to replace an existing 50-foot high monopole wireless communication facility with a 70-foot high monopine for the purposes of co-location in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) -APN 0202-101-11 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Faalities) C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Design Review DRC2004-01198 was withdrawn July 26, 2006 This item was continued from July 12, 2006 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This item is continued from July 12, 2006 D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH - A request to approve a new master plan for the phased development of various church faalities, including classroom buildings and education/retreat center, and including speafic design approval of a 2- story multi-purpose building, and approval to keep three temporary modular classrooms on 10 22 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 9974 19th Street-APN'S 1076-051-05, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 1076-061-10, 11, and 12 Staff has • • 2of5 • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 23, 2006 RANCHO G'UCAMONGA prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts V. NEW BUSINESS E PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2006-00683 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to review the site acquisition of 3 acres of land for a proposed expansion of the Etiwanda Colony Elementary school in the Estate Residential District (1 to 1 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 230 feet north of Banyan Street - APN 0225-122-65-0000 F PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2006-00685 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to review the proposed construction of an elementary school for approximately 950 students on 10 gross acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) to be located on the north side of Banyan Street, approximately 2,500 feet east of East Avenue - APN 0225 131-11 Related File Preliminary Review DRC2005-00097 VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS G PROGRESS REPORT ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-45 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-03 -MARGARITA BEACH VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adfournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 3of5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 23, 2006 jtANCxo G'UCAMONGA THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2006-00599 - KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 17, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga aa~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate In this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notifcation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the heanng impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply Indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is Important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per Individual If you wish to speak concerning an Item not on the agenda, you may do sounder "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners • L~ 4of5 • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 23, 2006 12Arrcxo CvcAMONCA All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at htto•/Iwww ci rancho-cucamonga ca.us 5of5 Vicinity Map ~ Planning Commission August 23, 2006 ,_ ~- ~ Meeting Location City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Q N • C~ i • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2006 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED I, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 17, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 (;IVIC Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamong R+a Staff Report DATE August 23, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Candyce Burnett, Associate Planner SUBJECT SECOND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 92.78 acres into 265 lots for single-family home construction The tract is part of a larger protect which includes a request for a parcel map and two tentative tract maps to subdivide 248 63 acres of land into 632 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Low Residential • District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located north of W ilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0225-071-37, 48, 50 and 0225-081-08 and 11 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM15699 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the protect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in July 2001 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report BACKGROUND The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15699, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 on July 24, 2002, for a 3-year period On July 13, 2005, the applicant applied for and received a 1-yeartime extension from the Planning Commission for SUBTT16226 The applicant is requesting a second request for a 1-year time extension for SUBTT16226 There have been no changes to the City's development standards since these maps were approved ANALYSIS A Subdivision Mag On January 6, 1999, the City Council amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to establish a 3-year initial approval period for tract and parcel maps (increased from 2 years previously) The amendment also allows the Planning Commission to grant time extensions in 12-month increments for up to 5 years (a maximum of 8 years from the original time approval), which is the maximum allowed under the State Subdivision Map Act Section • 66452 69(e) The maximum life of this protect would be up to 8 years from the date of ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBTPM15669, SUBTT16226, AND SUBTT16227-BCA DEVELOPMENT August 23, 2006 Page 2 • approval (final expiration on July 24, 2010) Additionally, a rough Grading Permit was issued on March 1, 2005, and the final maps are in plan check B Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Envronmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master EIR for the University/Crest Planned Development in June 1991 and in October 1999 The County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development In August 2001, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a mator revision to the previous EIR in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent orsupplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same protect unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the protect that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (n) substantial changes have occurred in the arcumstances under which the protect was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (ui) new important information shows the protect wdl have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts Staff has evaluated the time extension request and concludes • that substantial changes to the protect or the circumstances surrounding the protect have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR The site has been graded and portions of the site are under construction consistent with the previously approved applications The time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental EIR since the tentative parcel map and tentative tract maps were originally approved on July 24, 2002 Staff further finds that the protect will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, and do not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the protect to a level of less-than-sigmficant No changes have been made to the protect and there have not been substantial changes with respectto the circumstances underwhich the protect is undertaken, which will regwre mator revisions to the previous EIR Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required m connection with the City's consideration of the time extension request CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site • ~- 02 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBTPM15669, SUBTT16226, AND SUBTT16227- BCA DEVELOPMENT • August 23, 2006 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a 1-year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT LH/rlc Attachments• Exhibit A -Letter from Applicant dated June 16, 2006 Exhibit B -Location Map Exhibit C -Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15669, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Exhibit D -Initial Study Part I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension for SUBTT6226 • • ~3 / ;€~ ~` h~a~.. D[VELOPMENT, INC. ,- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 19 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING June 16, 2006 VIA OVERNIGHT Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Candtce Burnett -Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE Tentative Tract No 16226 Rancho Ettwanda Estates Dear Ms Burnett By way of this letter, we aze hereby requesting a Map Ttme Extension on Tentative Tract No 16226 due to timing of permits and construction Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact myself or Kimberly Vander Rtet Sincerely, BCA Dev oprne t, Inc. Ben C Anderson President BCA kv Enclosures EXHIBIT A ~J • 3194-C1 Airport Loop Dnve, Costa Mesa, CA 9266 T I~phone (714) 966-1544 -Fax (714) 966-1540 ~' U' LOCATION MAP , RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES SITE ~ - --o - _ i -- - - LA~wr'---- SCE ~ = - -~ ~„w„~ A~,,. r~ ~,< - - - - - _ r ' w O ~ ' / I I ' / / r ,~ 3 i I I i '`VILSON AVENUE I I I I ~ I W W W ~ ~I i ~ l w z z ~- NI I = I Q Q Q ° I I I , I I I BANYAN STREET I I I I w I I ~ - I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I } I I I o I m EXHIBIT B r ~ a ~~ ~a ow ~a~$i oQ~ ~~ ~°'"`~~ ~,p~ ~~z ~Q ~ az F ~1 a!iaieii'ezi•.cij^i°sl Eavinl ili~iiiteiPe taisllliiiieiile ii :'S5'S".6S S'e cee6~•,•f:•.6.. @.eee•~~6Y c [ C E d ~~~~ss~ii'sRt'Ei4.6if:SivbiEi9ii::iBFlirvElihlPlli~f~1111 E! ~ 8 p~p 5P B 8 @ g ~ ' J° f ! I ~li.i ~!ti[ ~ tali ~ iilo ~ 9~i°-iE IS:Si 4~Eft 9~Plt a6@d[ ~f EXHIBIT C ~ /U/_ 1 1 ~ ~ P ig i ~{ ~ pC !I gt ~:a i. e ~~ 1 ~' P :1 ~@~ ~e~1 gla :;; .. U ,~ ~~ --I ~~P :! ~~ e. a LC o° b @L ti ~C~ F Z a 1~!;~~ ~ ~~ 1 -~-- ~ i' ~ ei o¢ > °s ~E"" ~~ `V~c$~ u~'NG~ ~~~g8a~ s ~~~e~~ ~QZs o~ ~z ~~' ~ ~~, s C-2 ,1 ~ ,~ ~a 1~ ~" ~ gg~, ~!1 ~ 6 1~ { ~ 6 lae ,!a le 4 I+r II' ~ ~ ~~i ~!$1$ i~i e`.ieH ~~a~I lle~$ $e$f $p$€ $6$~ ~$!$ 1 i'$i$~1 I ~"o Ia.h $:!e $!a !.!e lade h ~ ~ i' ~ < A~~ I l a ilk°~~lt~.a a ~J~ } ~ II I 'II ~1 g I?~~I geea jl!$1l1: ~!!$1~ 9I1~ i li~a.oa a~1116i ~~t9~~ 9ZL91 11VIY.~•~°. i, t 1 °~ H _1 ~ Npp @ ~'Z~ ~° , t.r~~~ z. ° ~Ble~~~ile 91~Ia ~; L ----- I I, °~ '~ ~, I~ ° ° I P®i rr ~ I a ,43 , ~~ v I J„J ~ - , .w la r~r~ ,~ ~. I js Cl-~ ~ C-3 /~' ~ - LZZ9i 1JdN1 3N1d1N3.L • ~s N ~ O ~--I ~ ~ _° ~ Qe ~ t ~ U E.AU ( j i ° il~ldli ~ 1 ~tls I ' ~ AA 1 Il~le ~~~~ z n ~..+ ~ C ~A. i 0 F+ p ~ ; ~ p= ~ ; ~ s Y (J.~ 1 i I L6 A6 k ? IB '~ x 1 ° C°! I ~ 11 i ~ A` n- ^ - ~ MCA SCI 0 ~I~ e ~ e ~ eYeY~ IC 1 IiI~ ~ ~ ya t0 ~ 6 ACj~i ~I:OI ~ ' !AF eC0 0 `[~e~! ~p°tl ~~/~i ~i~R O: ~i ~l~i ~Afi ~I~E gg ~i~,i ~:~:i 6~a(i e.,i ~ ~ t i ~ i ~ I ' I ' I i C 1 i eC 0 . rC 'A I j~ ! fI! P C' ° ° t i~ I~ E .~ g ! ~ ~r~iC6I~Q~'°i' l I f~~eA!C4i~ i ' ~~! ~ °i i68E ; .......... - ~ C 4 - ~ - ~ ~,~ ~~~ {{~: aNge~ .~ Fe ~- ~~ ` >zg~ ~ ~~ ~ ~sb }f I c (~ ;,~; , i°;e ~® 1~dN1 ~` 1 I.os- ~'d - !Z~ LLL u C-5 se ~- ' ~'; ~- 91 ~` s9 ~ ' °" e~ Ff 1 ° e ~7 I Ot - ~ Ql ~ ~ ~'i~ s L' E 6N~pb[l fe~Q' .. ~ ~®I ~ ~~ f~ i afl ,• - i ~d ~le~ ~' ~N ie e . i i 1 J 1 lp ~ b City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: SUBTT16226 2. Related Files: SUBTPM15699, SUBTT16227, DRCDAC01-01, DRCGPA01-01, AND DRCENSPA01-02 3. Description of Project: SECOND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226 -BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 92 78 acres into 265 lots for single-family home construction The tract is part of a larger protect which includes a request for a parcel map and two tentative tract maps to subdvide 248 63 acres of land into 632 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located north of Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0225-071-37, 48, and 50 and 0225-081-08, and 11 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM15699 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the protect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the • County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in July 2001, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: BCA Development, Inc Ben Anderson 17780 Fitch Street, Suite 120 Irvine, CA 92614 5. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 6. Zoning: Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Utility Corrdor 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located at Day Creek Boulevard, north of Wilson Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue The site is bordered by a Southern California Edison Corridor designated Utility Corridor, Flood Control to the west, North Etiwanda Preserve (vacant) designated Hillside Residential to the north, Etiwanda Creek/vacant land designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the east, and recently-constructed single-family homes designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the south (University Planned Development) The original site sloped to the south and is part of a broad alluvial fan located at the based of the San Gabriel Mountains The site burned • during the 2003 Grand Prix Fire There are currently two housing developments under construction on Tract SUBTT16227 and two more protects are pending design review and permits for the site EXHIBIT D ~-a~ INITIAL STUDY FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBTT16226 PAGE 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: • City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Clvlc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Candyce Burnett, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None ANALYSIS: The Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates area provides fora 632 lot single-family subdivision on 248 63 acres, located west of Etiwanda Avenue and north of Wilson Avenue The Site Plan and building elevations for the proposed development are established by the Development Agreement and are intended to be generally consistent with development standards in the Development Code and Etiwanda North Specific Plan The impacts of the protect were evaluated as part of the EIR and no change is proposed The protect will be required to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the EIR and Subsequent Environmental • Impact Report (SEIR (1991]), as certified by the County of San Bernardino, and SEIR (2001), as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, Involving at least one Impact that Is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the ()Land Use and Planning ()Population and Housing ()Geological Problems ()Water O Air ~uahty ()Biological Resources ()Energy and Mineral Resources ()Hazards (1 Noise O Public Services ()Utilities and Service Systems ()Aesthetics ()Cultural Resources ()Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately In an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, Including revs or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect. Signed Candy urnett Associa tanner July 26, 2006 ~- is • i INITIAL STUDY FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBTT16226 PAGE 3 • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (X) Environmental Impact Report for University/Crest Planned Development (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) (Certified June 1991) (X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised University protect (State Clearinghouse No 96121091) (Certified October 26, 1999) (X) Initial Study/Addendum for Revised University Protect (Certified August 1, 2001) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION • I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature Print Name and Titie • ,~- / 3 RESOLUTION NO. 06-81 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A SECOND ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF 7A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16226, FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 265 LOTS ON 92 78 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 UNITS DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE NORTH ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKINGFINDINGSINSUPPORTTHEREOF-APN 0225-071-37,48 AND 50 AND 0225-081-08 AND 11 A Recitals. 1 BCA Development filed an application for a second time extension of previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sublect time extension request is referred to as "the application " 2 On July 24, 2002, this Commission adopted its Resolution No 02-77, thereby approving the application sublect to speafic conditions and time limits 3 On July 13, 2005, this Commission adopted its Resolution No 05-55, therebyapproving the application for cone-year time extension sublect to specific conditions and time limits • 4 On August 23, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application for a second one-year time extension and concluded said hearing on that date. 5 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 23, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies, and b Approval of the time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226 will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and polices; and c. Approval of time extension for SUBTT16226 is not likelyto cause public health and • safety problems, and day PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-81 SUBTT16226 - BCA DEVELOPMENT August 23, 2006 • Page 2 The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determmations• a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master EIR forthe University/Crest Planned Development in June 1991 and in October 1999 the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development In August 2001, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a mator revision to the previous EIR Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same protect unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the protect that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (u) substantial changes have occurred m the circumstances under which the protect was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (np new important information shows the protect will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or • different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b The Planning Commission finds, m connection with the second time extension request that substantial changes to the protect or the circumstances surrounding the protect have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated m the previously certified EIR The site has been graded and portions of the site are under construction consistent with the previously approved plans Staff further finds that the protect will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not regwred to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant No changes have been made to the protect and there have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the protect is undertaken, which will regwre mator revisions to the previous EIR. c Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the second time extension request for SUBTT16226 d. Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the EIR, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends Based on substantial evidence, the Planrnng Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of • Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) ,~ /5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-81 SUBTT16226 -BCA DEVELOPMENT • August 23, 2006 Page 3 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs t , 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for Tentative Map Applicant Expiration SUBTT16226 BCA Development July 24, 2007 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 02-77 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate, at its own expense, in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition • 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY • Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST. James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~1~ ANCt10 CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE August 23, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James Troyer, Planning Director BY Jennifer Fechner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00352 - CINGULAR WIRELESS - A request to replace an existing 50-foot high monopole wireless communication facility with a 70-foot high monopine for the purposes of co-location in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) - APN 0202-101-11 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION • A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Multi-Family Dwelling Units/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Post Office/Office Professional East - Multi-Family Dwelling Units/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Multi-Family Dwelling Units/Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Civic/Regional Public Facilities North - Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Office Commercial East - Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics The applicant is proposing to remove an existing 50-foot monopole and construct a 70-foot monopine for the purposes of co-locating with two existing wireless carriers to enhance cellular communication service for Cingular Wireless in the area. The monopine will be approximately 82 feet east of the curb face of Amethyst Avenue, near the southern edge of the fire station To the south of the fire station is a post office The proposed antennas, consisting of a total of 12 antenna panels, will be mounted on the pole at approximately 49 feet above the grade In addition, Cingular will mount one parabolic antenna at approximately 35 feet above the grade The existing wireless carriers, Sprint and T-Mobile, will be mounted at approximately 57 feet and 65 feet above the grade, respectively Artificial branches designed to resemble a Pine tree will be installed and the cylindrical pole will be embellished with a rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby providing a "stealth" design • ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00352 - CINGULAR WIRELESS August 23, 2006 Page 2 ANALYSIS • A General• The wireless communication facility is classified as a mator wireless communication faality because of its location on public land Mator wireless communication facilities are not permitted to be located within 300 feet of any residential structure or within 300 feet of any existing mator wireless communication facility, except when co-located on the same wireless facility The proposed wireless communication facility will be within 300 feet from the nearest residential structure, but because it will be co-locating with two existing carriers, it meets the City's criteria for a mator wireless communication facility In addition, the proposed monopine will be replacing an existing monopole, which is currently anon-stealth, legal non-conforming site The proposed equpment will be housed in a prefabricated structure which will be partially covered by an existing 4-foot high perimeter wall The applicant will also install a Canary Island Pine tree in the lawn area in front of the station to help screen the prefabricated equipment shelter The proposed Cingular facility meets the screening and site selection gwdelines for wireless communication facilities by providing stealth type design and evaluating three other locations that ultimately did not prove feasible B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Stewart, McPhail, and Coleman) reviewed the protect on July 18, 2006, and unanimously recommended approval C Grading Committee The Grading Review Committee reviewed the protect on July 18, 2006 The Committee did not identify any grading issues and recommended approval D Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on • July 18, 2006, and recommended approval E Environmental Assessment This protect is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site No correspondence has been received. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00352 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, ~'- c~ - 0 Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT JF/ric Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Topographic Survey Exhibit C -Photo Simulation Exhibit D -Site Plan Exhibit E -Elevations • Exhibit F -Design Review Action Comments and Action Agendas dated July 18, 2006 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00352 IJ'Z. • • €~ S~! p ~~[g [ p9 ! s` p Y S 9 ~5~~ 6 .~~ ~ ei x A O o.€ i I I -d ~~°a- 1 $ ~~ i , o0 J Q I g ~ -- = -- p I ~ ~ ~ S e ~ ~,. ' ! _ ~ _~--- i 9 i - --~ ~ B C~ 6~m~ ~ b - 5 i ~ ~la.~ 4 i I ® ~: ~ ~.. { I . ~~~ ~€ f~pp~• .~: ~i _ ~ I i A ppI F IL -_V-~-+--___ - ~~~_ _-~I ~ ~~ I 1 e 56iE~~ I@ _ ~4{S~~iI~~ ®®Pu •Y® e y@~ ~ g5 ~' _ f G ----- 3------ 30N3AY 1Sl//13Nv S € e & hd ~~~ e ~! ! ~ tt e€ F E p ~ ~ r d @ ~ ~ ~ F~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e sl' 1 ! ~ @ y y~ ~ a~ r • ~ a E @ tl 55~ gpY ° f h ° h 3~ Y € - @ p §h a ° °~ ~.~~ Y v AB g rs y g a ° y ssg p! [ p F ° ...,e. . p eF1! h i ~ ;~F i pp i ~ i ° 2 ' F {3p@ p o !A pr~ p g ! ! Y .~ ! p 9 e `e , v @~ ~ @€p v t~~ ° e ' ~ 0 ~ i ~ e A d r € e gptl - €ih ~~ a i~ ~aSz _ pp ~ F 3 6 € ~F di ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~e a d r ~, v;p!~ w i ~ v0 P!! ° tl. 0 33 ~ e ~ c ~ 4 ~ € a 9 9 tl 3r e e uF€ 04 m'p mo „r Exhibit Ar 21 :~° ~ t` _ '~~ m - ~I, F« T Q W ~ ~ .I ;~' A 3 `~J F `• I 0 i U S u - ~ > J _ ~ _ 0 ~ +` : ` o Z j I ~ °c I S ] U ~ G u i o 0 I o 1 0 u ° y 4 z ( o 6 ¢ • ~ ` ry : 0 O f 6 ~ c' W I 'i T n W ` 1 1 C i a f - M N I Y I I } m o Y W ~ 0 F r ~ i Q I w w o (~ C N ~ ~ m ,~ m ~ m > ~ _ W i o q W r a W R m ~ W 0 LL m , i p 9 r ~ C - ' o -2 _ j ~ ~ ~ 3 Q 0 £ W U ~ ~ z _ m - ~ Y ° U _ o ` ~ o ,~ } I J O 6 ~ , I ~. i ~ W U , .~ m Z r. r, ~ 1ti o W ¢ Q • ~ a ~:•~ ~ ~ ~ i F ; i ~: ~ li ~~~ ] ' ~~ y ~~• 4 ~ `I~ ) ~I~ I ~ ~7 )y ` ~ ' i~ 1 '~ S~Y_1:4'. t ay41 i 'f li f ~I ,'q ~ u l ~" yy 4 t ' G e ry\ ~+'rv~s su ~`4fko-i~i+.m..; i.'~}~~ ~ f r tl ~- ~ t e ~~~ 1Y s ,. } ry ~1, ~A~- o+ M u~m ~a),i~ i ~ ~~ IL¢y `tf I r ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ .. a.3 ~ I ~ ~~ ~ 9 ~ ~ I • L - a - r ~ ~ SLS I ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ,r ~ ~ ~ ~ A~..._ ; _ ` ~ 2 ~ o _ ~osx•c~~t j~ J ~ . ~,~' as _ , - ° W _ . ~ i3 -~ _ C • • R6i~ Q ~l~w $ 3 ~~~ ro r ~;n^ gg - - ~ m i _ih B w ~- v ~ ~ m ~ ~ o Q ~ _ L_mm- W JJ~ll lll .~ o Z - 0 0 a a u o W ~ x 0 I __ _ ~ ilh~ ' i 2 i ~ 4 ay, ~ z i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ c w ~ ~ ~ tJ @4r ~~ W f `~ ~ aY~, a N , ~ ~ - f m ~ ` y ~ } t ~ ~• m ~ i ~ 4. c w . ^~ o F .. ~ ! ', yfY~ fi'+ N f,i/ ~ #9 ~,'' ~ ~ ~ Ti a p ~ y'~.L iM N ~~~ ~ `}> k rv~ F W u ~~`Ik . F ~ IL i ~+ ~ ~ _ i 4 ~ o ~ ~` a . Z Wo ~ t t 4 I O 6 i r" ~' #i ` Q x ~Ny .a`r N t. '4 i i U I , ~ ~ ~ ,F,~Y, r t Y _ ~ is J I W V ~ ~ 0 Z a 4 ~ Q _ ~ ~ { a ~ R •~' ` " F ' ~, t ~~ ~,:~~ j 1_ SL ~~. a} M F ' •~ t` 3 l J . . ~ ~ ~ _ a i ~ 3 _ i ~ - ~ ~ ~ is' d ~~ ~~ ', ~: _ i P i _ t ~ r ~~F4 >.i ~ r 2 0 ~~ 1 . yy ~ 1 ?~`(E. " ~ F h , ~si.f, Z ~'r s~~ ° ~ Y W _ U ~ ~~ o, .~ s a _ i ~~ 3 I • ~xh,~ lJ r ~xh~b~~-D I~I'I /, I • ACTION AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY JULY 18, 2006 7 00 P.M RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM '' 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ,, RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart Dan Coleman Alternates• Rich Macias Richard Fletcher Lou Munoz ~~ CONSENT CALENDAR 7 00 p.m. ~ ~ ~ ~. (Emily/Cam) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Df~C2006-00098 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - _ A request for architectural review of 114 homes for Rancho Etiwanda Estates (APN. 0225-071-47, 0225-081-09, 0225'-071-51, and 0225-081-14) Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the protect covered by a pnor Environmental Impact Report '(State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new • environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarduig their development application The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p m. (Jennifer/Shelley) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00352 - CINGULAR WIRELESS - A request to replace an existing 50-foot high monopole wireless communication facility with a 70-foot high monopine for the purposes of co-location in the Low-Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Street - APN. 0202-101-11. T20 p m. (Vance/Shelley) HILLSIDE REVIEW DRC2005-00997 -MICHAEL E. MULLIGAN -Review of a 5,975 square foot single-family residence in the Very Low Residential Zone (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on Canistel Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN: 1074-491-28. 7.40 p m. (Louis/Cam) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVLOPMENT COMPANY - A request to subdivide 41 acres of land into 57 single-family lots within the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units • per acre), located on the south side of Banyan Street, approximately 1,220 feet east of East Avenue -APN 0225-191-012. Related File Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00174. q ~- I =X~I bj~ ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS ~ . 7 00 p m Jennifer Fechner July 18, 2006 • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00352 - CINGULAR WIRELESS - A request to replace an existing 50-foot high monopole wireless communication facility with a 70-foot high monopine for the purposes of co-location in the, Low-Medwm Residential Districf,' located at 6627 Amethyst Street - APN: 0202-101-11. Desian Parameters The profect site is located on the south side of Fire Station #171 on Amethyst Avenue. The site is approximately 80 feet east of the curb face of Amethyst Avenue. The applicant is proposing to remove an existing 50-foot monopole and construct a 70-foot monopine, for the purposes of co-locating with two existing wireless carriers, enhancing cellular communication service for Cingular Wireless in the area. The proposed antennas, consisting of a total of 12 antenna panels, will be mounted on the pole at approximately 49 feet above the grade In addition, Cingular will mount one parabolic antenna at approximately 35 feet above grade. The existing wireless carriers, Sprint and T-Mobile, will be mounted at approximately 57 feet and 65 feet above grade, respectively. Artificial branches, designed to resemble a Pine tree, will be installed, and the cylindrical pole will be embellished with a rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby, providing a "stealth" design. The wireless communication facility is classified as a mafor wireless commurncation,facility because of its location on public land Mafor wireless communication facilities are ndt permitted to be locate within 300 feet of any residential structure or within 300 feet of any existing mafor wireless communication facility, except when co-located on the same wireless facility. The proposed wireless communication facility is within 300 feet of the Rudolph Hendrickson senior • apartments and market rate apartments to the east, but because it will be co-locating with two existing carriers, it meets the City's criteria for a mafor wireless communication facility. In addition, the proposed monopine will be replacing an existing monopole, which is currently a non-stealth, legal non-conforming site. The proposed equipment will be housed in a prefabricated structure which will be partially covered by an existing 4-foot high perimeter wall. The proposed Cingular facility meets the screening and site selection guidelines for wireless communication facilities by providing stealth type design and evaluating three other locations that ultimately did not prove feasible Staff Comments. The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discusswn. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this profect 1. Plant a Canary Island Pine tree within the lawn area in front of station to help screen pre-fabricated equipment shelter. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review and approve the protect subfect Desion Review Committee Action. The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman • Staff Planner Jennifer Fechner ~3 RESOLUTION NO 06-80 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00352, FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING 50-FOOT HIGH MONOPOLE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY WITH A 70-FOOT HIGH MONOPINE ON 1 02 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT CITY FIRE STATION #171, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 0202-101-11 A Recitals 1 Cingular Wireless filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00352, as described in the title of this Resolution Heremaffer in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearng on August 23, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows• a The application applies to properly located on the east side of Amethyst Street, north of 19th Street, and south of the 210 Freeway, with a total street frontage of approximately 195 feet on Amethyst Street, which is presently improved with a City Fire Station, and b The property to the north of the subject site is zoned Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units; the property to the south is zoned Office Professional and is developed with a U S Post Office, the property to the east is zoned Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units, and the property to the west is zoned Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units; and c The application proposes the replacement of a 50-foot monopole with a 70-foot monopine for the purposes of co-location, consisting of 12 antenna panels, l parabolic antenna with artifinal branches to resemble a Pine tree, and rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby providing a stealth design that blends with the built environmentwhich meets the goals and objectives of the Development Code Cingularwill mount one parabolic antenna at approximately 35 feet above grade The existing wireless carriers, Sprint and T-Mobile, will be mounted at • approximately 57 feet and 65 feet above grade, respectively, and d The proposed wireless fanlity will be of suffinent height to allow Cingular W fireless to co-locate with two other carriers on the enhanced wireless fanlity, thereby, meeting the goals and objectives of the Development Code by converting an existing legal, non-conforming structure to a ~'' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-80 DRC2006-00352 - CINGULAR WIRELESS August 23, 2006 Page 2 stealth wireless site and allowing for the placement of multiple wireless carriers on a single-pole • structure 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the wcinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • Plannino Department i) Approval is for the installation of antennas for wireless communication purposes The antennas shall be installed on a cylinder that will be covered with faux material to imitate a Pine tree. The color of the parabolic antenna and all appurtenant supporting brackets and attachments shall be painted to match the branches of the monopine. 2) The wireless communication facility and the equipment shelter shall be constructed m accordance with the approved plans on file with the Planning Department 3) Any expansion, modification, or alternation to the monopine shall require review and approval by the Planning Department 4) The equipment shelter and landscaping shall match the existing equipment shelter and landscaping for the existing fire station 5) All equipment necessary for the operation of the wireless facility shall be contained inside the equpment shelter 6) Signs are not permitted on the monopine or the equipment shelter, except signage required for emergency notification purposes and that requred by regulatory agencies 7) The antenna and the egwpment shelter shall be maintained in good • condition at all times Damaged and/or weathered equipment, including appurtenant equipment, shall be repaired promptly n r~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-80 DRC2006-00352 - CINGULAR W IRELESS August 23, 2006 Page 3 • 8) No wireless communication facility shall interfere with the public safety radio communications system including, but not limited to, the 800 MHz trunking system If such a facility is found to interfere with the public safety radio system, it shall cease operations immediately until such time as the problem is resolved to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 9) Except for necessary emergency maintenance, maintenance of the wireless communication facilityand all appurtenantequipmenton anyday, except Sundays, shall occur only between the hours of 8 00 a m and 8.00 p m On Sundays, maintenance shall occur only between the hours of900a.m.and800pm 10) A Canary Island Pine tree shall be installed in the lawn area in front of the station to provide additional screening for the prefabricated equipment shelter Eng ineering Department 1) The cell tower shall not interfere with the existing radio frequency based systems on-site 2) Tower installation shall not impede the delivery of emergency services 3) Tower operation may only be conducted after final inspection and approval by the Crty. • 4) A permanent generator should be scheduled to exercise at times during regular business hours to provide least disruption to nearby residents. 5) The equipment enclosure shall be provided with light fixtures on the north, south, east and west sides 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit • AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ~ _) 3 ABSENT COMMISSIONERS• COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00352 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY APPLICANT: CINGULAR WIRELESS LOCATION: 6627 AMETHYST STREET (AMETHYST FIRE STATION) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements t The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such actlon The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-80, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations •SC-1-O5 ' ~,-iy Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/~- -/-J- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-003525td Cond 8-23 doc Protect No DRC2006-00352 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditicns of Approval shall be _/_/~ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of bulding permits 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults D. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours _/~_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~~_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, • c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (DRC2006-00352) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and Clty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~_/_ the City poor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/~_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department 6~ ^I 5 ~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00352Std Cond 8-23 doc Project No DRC2006-00352 Completion Date F. Site Development • 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (DRC2006-00352) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/_/_ mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter) G. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness • 2 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ H. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits ~ i3-l~ 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Stl Rpt\DRC2006-00352Std Cond 8-23 doc Protect No DRC2006-00352 Comolehon Date A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California • registered Civil Engineer 13-i~ a • • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00352Std Cond 8-23 tloc T H E C I T Y O F RANCnO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE August 23, 2006 TO Chapman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY. Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue - APN 0227-121-33 and 37. Related File Design Review DRC2004-01198 was withdrawn July 26, 2006 This item was continued from July 12, 2006. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of envponmental impacts for consideration. • A Project Density 2 dwelling units per acre General Plan Designations Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B Surroundino Land Use and Zonmg North - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Property, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), East Avenue West - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics The site is located approximately 330 feet west of East Avenue and creates the cul-de-sac formation of "Street A," which intersects East Avenue To the north and south, are existing single-family residences, to the east, are vacant parcels abutting East Avenue, and to the west, is asingle-family home (Hippard Ranch) ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND A General On July 12, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed proposed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 along with the development review of 6single-family homes Upon the review of both items at the public hearing, it was brought to the Commission's attention that one neighboring • resident did not agree with the development of two-story homes on all 6 lots A neighboring resident, Jim Banks, felt that the proposed homes were inconsistent with the historic nature of the Hippard Ranch Because of this issue, the Planning Commission recommended that both items be ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT #2 August 23, 2006 Page 2 continued until the applicant could meet wth staff to see if a compromise could be agreed upon The Planning Commission agreed to reconvene once the issues had been resolved to the satisfaction of staff Approximately two weeks after the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant notified staff that they would proceed with the tract map only, in order to have a portion of the loan released Staff then notified the abutting property owner of the applicant's intentions and began the process of re-notifying the neighbors within the 300-foot radus and received confirmation from the abutting property owner that the notice was received. B Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to construction noise, dust mitigation, and hydrology, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project CJ CORRESPONDENCE This item was re-advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map • SUBTT16578 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Resp cttully submitted, 12 ~ Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director DC EC/ge Attachments Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Draft Resol Tentative Tract Map Planning Commission Minutes dated July 12, 2006 Letter from Jim Banks dated July 31, 2006 Irntial Study ution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 U ~,a • ~~ l(~ ~~ r{ ~ C a ~~ rr~ l y ~~ ~~ N~ rr ,, E I~ ~ ~~ _~ ~c~ KC6 Y w ~ ' ~~~un W ~~ Yva~v[w CYSNIQL TAYJ Q~LLl5N0'J N 'U I J~ ~ - - l I .y ~ l r___~ a ~___ __ ~ i - ;" l~ I ; ---~ ; ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~;' o 4 1- ~ - ~~ -- ,r~.«.~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - -~ ~ ~~~i '~Y~ -r--~-.o« ten- --- _ _~~ _ , ,I ~ ~1 ( , ~ 11v ~:-~ lr __,~---~ ~ III\~ ~~ - '--L - I I~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ V , ~~ ~ `~`~ 1 v ~~~\~U,1 n ~ ~ \~ \~Q ~~ 1 i ~ ~ ~-~~ ~ `~~' l / e~sei erx unu enurtuax .,` ~ \ \~\ ~ J. _\ ~.tY~ 'M.-o-= ~k ~ „= a ~ o~ „~- I ~IS 8I i i ~~ ~ I I I ~: yy ~ P ~, ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 /z ~ ~ I ~- ~. ~ .n, «, '~ t / ~fff444CCC i~ ` 0." ~ ~~ r~~ { ~ ~~'~~ 1~ O~I s ~~ ` I o °_'~~ i ~ 1 ~ JAI I q~q~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 } ~N~ i c~ ~~~~"~ ~~ ~ i r~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~®~ 1 1 ~~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~~ a i 1 J~ ~ _ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ gg ~~ _ \ irwi~ r \ \~O ~ ~~ EXHIBIT A ~ ~3, ~, `~\>~1~ U '~ ® ~' ~- F E~ : v ~ ~ r~ K~ =~ s S` 8 ~~"8 all ~~~~~~~~ a e • f A .yyg ,,=-- E Fed' ~ `-i F S ~~ F~~t~~~assy ~~ _ , -~ ~~ ~ ~~ °' _ w ° ~ s~ J yb~p ~( r a ~ ~~ ~ ~' "'g X583 ~~ ` 4 ~~~~ ~$~~ ~ I ~ _ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~r - ~ e ~t9~3~ffiP '^ = ~ ~, _~ ~ ~ ~d _a ~e =_ ~ 4 9i; A4p~pl~@$~3 ~ ~[,rsetle~~ } I I }~ III I ~~ ~~ ,' APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Munoz made a correction on Page 6 of the minutes The Planning Commission Secretary noted the change Motion Moved by McPhail, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Maass absent), to approve the minutes of June 28, 2006 R f 1( Yr CONSENT CALENDAR A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 -LILY KAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6 single-family homes on 2 99 acres of land m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatroe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Item A was pulled from the Consent Calendar to be discussed in conjunction with Item B ..... PUBLIC HEARINGS C~ B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT-A request to subdwide 2 99 acres of land into 6single-family lots m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 • Related File Design Review DRC2004-01198 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Emily Cameron gave the staff report and noted that placed before the Commissioners are Engineering conditions forthe map thatwere inadvertently left out of the staff report and resolution She also reported that a letter had been received from Jim and Marsha Banks, which is attached to the staff report, detailing their concerns related to historic preservation, preserving the setting, the relationship ottheir historic home and the proposed adtacent development, theireconomic sacrifice, design consistency within the neighborhood, their desire for single-story product to be built instead of the proposed "big box" design Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing Lily Kaut, 10630 Towne Center Drive #101, stated she is the applicant and that she and two other members of her family purchased the 3 acre parcel and that they have been processing the project over the course of the last 3 years Commissioner McPhail asked why she did not choose to build single-story homes and who will be living in the homes and which lots will be occupied by family Mrs Kaut stated that 3 of the homes will be lived in by family members and that the other 3 have already been sold She reported that she has checks and contractual purchase agreements in hand because she sold them 3 months ago She mentioned that she held a neighborhood meeting and no one came She said she and her family members are in the front 3 lots and the back 3 were sold • Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 12, 2006 Chairman Stewart asked for confirmation that they are completed deals • Mrs Kaut confirmed that the lots 3 and 4 are sold and that she asked the buyers if they would be willing to make changes but would not She said because of the last three years of processing and because of the changes she sold the remaining 3 properties Commissioner Fletcher asked if at the beginning of this process if she was aware of a development standard to provide single-story homes Mrs Kaut said no, she had been submitting two-story home plans since the beginning and no one mentioned a requirement for single-story homes She said she invited her neighbors to a neighborhood meeting and no one was in opposition She reported that Mr Banks had an issue with the fence material because he claimed it would damage trees, so she changed to wrought iron because he said that would not damage the roots of the trees as opposed to the solid wall proposed for the project She remarked that later Ms Cameron called her and suggested an acrylic fence material because Mr Banks requested it She said she was complying with what he asked She said that was the only request from the neighbors Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney commented that according to California law and the Subdivision Map Act and the Department of Real Estate, the property could not be sold unttl the subdivision has occurred and the map was approved and recorded because property cannot be sold before lots are even created He questioned the validity of the sale He remarked that even if there were only preliminary discussions regarding the acquisition of the lots, it would not preclude the City from reviewing and making a decision on the map and development He noted that those who enter into such agreements do so at their own risk and that does not preclude the City from making decisions regarding development, building sizes, changes in the lot configurations until the map is acted upon • Chairman Stewart asked if the buyers are all family members Ms Kaut replied three of them are Jim Banks Jr , 13181 Victoria Street stated this is his residence address, however, he does not receive mail there and that is most likely the reason he did not receive notices regarding the project neighborhood meeting He stated his mailing address is 10788 Civic Center Drive He commented that he was never in favor ofwrought iron fencing because coyotes can get through it and therefore he asked for the "Cedar Crete" product He referred to the zoning noted in the staff report are statistics and he believes statistics can lie He noted that the staff report indicates the property to the North of the project area is Low Residential He commented that he believes the City changed that to Very Low about a year ago He said part of his property is Low and some of it is in the Very Low Residential District He said the development in question is actually is Very Low density He said he did not know what the zoning is to the south but that is already developed He commented that he believes the ratio of single vs two-story homes is not important, but the way it is built is important He said that there are few two-story homes and all the homes are smaller He said the smallest of the proposed homes is bigger than the largest of what has already been bwlt and since they are two-story homes, they are also massive He commented that because of the Subdivision Map Act, the sale agreements Ms Kaut is holding are not legal or enforceable and that they are contingent on the City's action He commented that all six homes look like they are designed by one architect He said the Design Review Committee (DRC) pointed out that they are large homes clustered around one small cul-de-sac He said the project would appear to be a big forest of big blocks which is inconsistent with everything around it He stated he believes the proposed dwellings are not compatible with the General Plan, Municipal Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan He commented on the "buffer " He referred to Exhibit A on page A & B-4 of the agenda packet as being • an old map (pre 1990) prior to the addition of their garage (barn) or the south addition to their home He said most of the buffer is his property and therefore the developer is not really providing a buffer, Planning Commission Minutes -3- July 12, 2006 !n ~~ he and his wife are apart from the 38 foot backyards of the new homes He quoted the Muniapal Code Sections 17 08 010 which refers to intent of compatibility, and Section 17 08 040 which lists the intent of compatibility to provide transitions He said there is no transition in size, height, density • or of any kind He noted Section 17 08 090 regarding setbacks from adjacent properties as it pertains to scale He referred to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Section 5 42 100 and regarding character of development in Etiwanda He noted Section 5 42 202 describes how the architecture and design elements of new development should be rural, rustic, informal, and traditional and have a low profile, not massive He cited Section 5 42 500 that states developments of 4 dwelling units or more shall have a design that is sensitive to and compatible with the character of the surrounding area He commented that the General Plan also indicates development design should be compatible with the surrounding and existing development and be based upon prominent design features in the immediate area such as trees, landforms and historic landmarks He said he is trying to protect the historic environment around the historic landmark and to preserve the setting is important to the City too He remarked that placing these large homes so near to his home would destroy the setting He said the Commission should "consider taking the hard line " He said that the Commission should conclude that some of these homes should be single-story He commented that he believes the City has a 25% minimum for a ratio of single-story homes to two-story homes He asked why we are making an exception when we have so many good reasons not to make the exception Mr Banks spoke for approximately 25 minutes Commissioner Fletcher asked if his property is gated Mr Banks stated he has 3 gates, 1 to the house and 2 to the vineyards Mr Banks said they have had several home tours and the public has not been shut out Commissioner Fletcher said he went to visit the property and from the street it was difficult to see • anything or get a flavor for the property because it is so hidden with mature vegetation He commented that he is fortunate to have such a buffer on his property because development has occurred all around his property He said they have to be sensitive to the historic nature of his property but that it is also important to be compatible to his site and the new development surroundings as well Mr Banks said that privacy is important but that he tries not to make a big deal out of it He said he believes he has spoken in terms of what the standards are He said they bought as much of the property as they could afford Chairman Stewart commented that since she allowed Mr Banks to go on so long, that she would make a procedural exception and allow the applicant to respond Mrs Kaut noted that the size of the homes was reduced from 3,600 square feet to 3,200 square feet She displayed a map on the overhead projector indicating where the eucalyptus tree line appears to serve as a green wall She indicated new trees would be planted and the new Cedar Crete wall would also help protect his privacy She said her protect meets the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan but that she would change the exterior material to river rock to match the river rock on Mr Banks' home Commissioner McPHail said the reduction of the house product is compatible with the surrounding homes in the area Chairman Stewart closed the public hearing • Planning Commission Minutes -4- July 12, 2006 C-~ Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, commented that there is an appropriate densitytransition and that the allowable range noted in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan is 2-4 dwelling units • per acre He said the protect is being developed at the bottom of that range at 2 dwelling units per acre He added that the setbacks are larger than required He said that along the shared property line the setback measures 38 feet from the bay pop out and is about 40 feet from the main mass of the homes He said the requirement is only 25 feet He said the average lot size is almost 16,000 square feet and the minimum required by the Specific Plan is 10,000 square feet He noted that the 153-foot measurement was not taken from the map shown on Exhibit A, but was taken from the more recent tract grading plans and does include the addition to the Banks' home to the south Ms Cameron commented that the Design Review Committee originally asked for single-story elements including, single-story garages, one-story wrap around porches, generous sideyards and popouts Commissioner McPhail said single-story homes were discussed and that they determined they would need about 1 and Yz single-story homes if they were going to require them She said they settled on using single-story elements in the street portion of the development to soften the appearance of the two-story product She commented that at Design Review they considered placing a single-story home within the development however, it would have been at the street instead of the back of the development and if they had imposed the requirement for one single-story home, the street face would have looked disturbing in that it would not have provided a good transition from the street to the back end of the site She said she is passionate about historic preservation but that we cannot stop time or development by law and that she would love to see more vineyards She noted that they compromised with the single-story elements and compatible materials She added that the lots are very large and she has visited the site She commented that much of Etiwanda is being developed with very large and beautiful homes She noted that the • proposed 6-foot wall will help with the privacy issues She said she would like the developer to use additional buffering in the rear yards along with the existing eucalyptus and all things considered, she is sttll in favor of the protect and supports the staff recommendation for approval Commissioner Munoz agreed and he thanked Mr Bank's for his feel forthe community as it used to be He said there was a time when one could look at Rancho Cucamonga and that it was once one of the largest grape producers and now the vineyards are almost gone He said he visited the site and that the homes around it are more of the character of what will be built He said the developer has worked with the City to soften the appearance of the two-story homes and that it is unlikely that any property could transition smoothly to the Banks' property and what it ideally could be in a perfect world He said the best thing they can do is to guide the development the best they can He concurred with staffs recommendations Commissioner Fletcher remarked that he is uncomfortable with the lots being pre-sold He said that this is not valid or enforceable and should not dictate City development standards because it is finanaally expedient forthe developer He said that to design a development without all the facts is not a reason to ask for an amendment to our standards He commented that the reference to these homes being "custom" is in error, they are not He said he is disturbed with the single-gabled horizontal roofline and that he does not think the single-story elements such as a single level garage is a suitable replacement for single-story homes that would be in conformance with the policy of requiring single-story housing He said these elements aide the street wew more typically to a long street with two story homes with front-on garages all the way down the road on both sides of the road that creates a tunnel, box-on-box effect He said a mix of single-story homes is a development standard at a minimum of 20% and Mr Banks noted it in his letter He remarked that he does not believe this development will affect his property and that there is a mix of single and two-story • homes in the surrounding area He remarked in regard to Mr Banks' letter that his home is a low structure bwlt of river rock and that he believes the two-story homes will affect his historic property He said he does believe the development should be sensitive to the historic landmark and that he Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 12, 2006 C-'~ does not see much in the design of the homes that reflects that historic character He added there should have been more historic character that went into the design of these homes He said it is fortunate that he has land around his home and that will be more importantto the preservation of the • character of the historic property He said there is a demand for single-story homes with the aging population He said it is possible to put asingle-story home on these larger lots He said it is important to maintain that element in the design standard He said he believes the concern is not so much the nature of the development but how it is developed He mentioned the surrounding land does have a mixture of single-story and two-story homes He said he would like this to go back to the Design Revew Committee to maintain the standard for single-story product Chairman Stewart said she sees it differently, that she does not disagree or agree with everything being said She reported that the project went to DRC twice and she wsited the site twice and she shared her concern with staff and the Commission She said she walked the property and teed to envision this project and she seemed satisfied with it She said they were looking at the front of the development as the transition area, they worked with the idea of single-story and they decided to mitigate some things but still followed the codes She said they followed the codes but perhaps misunderstood in that she believed this was a "family type" of development She said she tries to respect each homeowner She commented that she is very unhappy that the parcels were being sold to other people and they are developing the property without approval from the City She commented that this is the second time this has occurred and she publicly stated that this practice will not continue She remarked that she considered everything and she does not believe single- storyhomes will help with the historic enterprise in this situation She noted that the developer said she would work with them to get further enhancements She remarked that she may have missed something at DRC and would like to return the project to the Design Review Committee and to also ask staff to come up with enhancements that would improve the project in conjunction with the Banks' concerns She commented that Mr Banks participated in the development of the Foothill Marketplace and that perhaps he could assist with this protect to make it compatible with the historic • nature of the site Commissioner McPhail asked the Commission to consider asking Mr Bank's to work with the applicant and staff rather than return the project to DRC Chairman Stewart said she would be agreeable to that Commissioner Fletcher intepected that he still is disturbed with 6 two-story homes, that there is plenty of land and that even asingle-story with a loft could be considered He said he would like it to go back to Design Review Move Fletcher motioned to send the project back to DRC to give the single-story standard adequate consideration Commissioner Munoz asked for clarification of the motion He said he heard one motion to send the project back to DRC and another motion that does not He asked which is he voting on now Commissioner Fletcher noted that the motion is to take it back to DRC for adequate consideration The motion failed for lack of a second Chairman Stewart moved that the project be continued to a date non-specific and that staff would work with the applicant and the Bank's and consult with the DRC representatives (McPhail and Stewart) to address the concerns and then bring it back to the Commission when it is ready • Planning Commission Minutes -6- July 12, 2006 C -8 Commissioner Fletcher pointed out that if they do not go backto DRC then there is a risk of coming backto the Planning Commission resulting in an unsatisfactory response from the Commission He • said he did not know how Commissioner Macias would respond Chairman Stewart said there is a motion and asked for a second Commissioner McPhail seconded the motion Chairman Stewart said she would like to entertain amending the motion m deference to Commissioner Fletcher's comments and send it to DRC as a Consent item Commissioner McPhail stated that she believed they could come to a solution without going backto DRC Commissioner Fletcher responded that he is still not satisfied with the protect because it does not have single-story product He did not believe that could be done without going backto DRC Commissioner McPhail said she did not believe there was support from the rest of the Commission to do that Chairman Stewart suggested the applicantwork with Mr Banks and staff and then take it to DRC as a Consent Calendar item before returning to the Commission Commissioner McPhail commented that the motion she seconded was to work with the Banks', staff, and the applicant with the ability to consult with the representatives of DRC towards a resolution James Troyer, Planning Director ascertained that there was a motion and a second to bring the • protect back to Planning Commission on anon-specified date He said that should be voted upon and then if needed it can be amended Mr Ennis noted that the motion was to work with staff the Banks', and the applicant and the item will be brought back to the Commission Mr Coleman noted that the public hearng was closed prior to the motion and that should probably be addressed Mr Ennis noted that it would be re-noticed prior to the next hearing Motion Moved by Stewart, seconded by McPhail, to continue the item to a date non-specific to allow time for the applicant to work with staff and Jim Banks and to bring the protect back to the Commission when the protect is ready It was noted that the item will be re-advertised for public hearing at that time Motion carried by the following vote AYES MUNOZ, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES FLETCHER ABSENT MACIAS -carried ..... C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17222 - NEBS HOME DEVELOPMENT - A request to subdivide 0 92 acre of land into 4 lots in the Low Residential Distnct (2~ dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet north of Vivero Street, on the east side of Carnelian Street, at the terminus of Candlewood Avenue - APN 0207-551-73 Related file • Variance DRC2005-01078 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration CONTINUED FROM 6/28 Planning Commission Minutes n7~ July 12, 2006 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10788 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 AUG 0 7 2006 (909) 980-0677 RECEIVED -PLANNING 31-July-2006 Emily Cameron, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 RE: Planning Comrmssion Agenda August 23, 2006 Subdivision of 61ots by Lily Kaut West of'East Ave, South of Victoria Dear Emily: Thank you for returning my phone call of Monday morning and for • explaining the reason for the August 23 Planning Comrmssion heanng. The Nonce came as a surpnse as I had been expecting to be mvrted to a conference to discuss options. As you explained m your voce mail message, the developer has withdrawn her application for the "house product". The hearing on the 23rd of August is, therefore, stnctly for the subdivision of the six lots I am requesting some further assurance regarding the scope of the decision on the subdivision. I recall seeing a subdivision map that contained the words "2 story house" on each lot. I want to make sure that a decision on the subdivision of the land is totally independent from a later decision about the height of the houses to be placed on the lots. At the first Planning Comnussion on this subdivision I spoke about the adjacent zoning designations and called them "misleading". I felt as though there was an adverse reaction from the staff person who spoke after you spoke, so I thought I should clarify that I did not mean to say or to imply that • EXHIBIT C C io • Emily Cameron, Associate Planner Planning Department July 31, 2006 Page 2 the use of the statistics was intentionally misleading; just that statistics can lead to an incorrect conclusion. ' I infer from the withdrawal of the house product that our meeting to work things out is not going to occur at this time. I will be available should the developer reapply for six 2-story houses on six lots. I do feel compelled to say that the withdrawal of the house product adds to the evidence that the houses were not pre-sold as you and I understand the meaning of that term. Agam, thank you for lettmg me know the status. Please let me know about the scope of the subdivision decision and keep me informed of any changes regarding the house product. Thank you. • JBJ:paa • e~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Plannup lkdslon (809)477.2750 fro cYso,t attheCtoma~`r'eview he Faro e~ou~uant'toyC~ Polices 2j~dh antes=and. Guidelines;~~ t#i'e-.~Califorriia~'.Enviw:Anrr~ental,.~Quality;~ct~ and:-tFi't 'C~ sv Rules~~Fanc~ ir79. '4~ '.ciP ~e ,~.. ,y. a, r a.•`e .L,..~r . ~~~%'~K~~,idVr i '_ Procedure'~s~:~o~<Imp~einent~CE_QA.'~ Its importan'~`<tha#;the,~lnforniation~re ues~d. nd'tliis°~ z vo2 .t sr` ,_ , b, ca_ y.. Y„~d.~.. ~ ^~ 1 na• __.~F-•~~ +R V. _i~TDY>Jt~Ba;~rltfllti~ .,•:~~' r..~f}ti ~ ~ ~ ~i._ ~:{:.~,•s_s.:^ ti' °"o.~~ applicat~o r ~ ;~'~:'rau i~.;~_.:,~:.~,tw~„}~~p .~ ~-...,,.~~,i:~n:~~ ~"'° ~„< ' ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly us(ng Ink. Use fha tab key to move from one line to the next line.) AppbcaUon Number for the protect to which this form peRams• Pro/ect TMe. V ~ ~ U iii~// SvBDI / S ~ ~ ~n '7 Nam BAddres~~f~roi otowner(s)' ~Y ~>'1/1//.T ~^ 9d~- /Gl ~/ .,~ - - ~ Name 8 Address of developer or project sponsor Contact Person 8 Address ~ ~ ~ ~E ~ /"~ S R 7 ~6 I q~ ST. # 2~S ~} ~r~- Laa-tA { C A- R ~ 701 Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form (d different from above) EXHIBIT D Page 1 Created on 5/22!2002 4 09 PM INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that h Is the responslalny or me appricam ro ensure ma! the application is complete at the Ume of submittal, City staff will not be available fo peAorm work required fo provide mrssing rnfortnation. , , PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: L Information indicated by an asterisk (') rs not required o(non-conshuctron CUP's unless othenvrse requested by staff • •1) Provide a full scale (8-111 x t 1) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which rnGudes the pro/ed site, and Indicate the site boundaries. rowde a set of color photographs that show representabve views into the Sfte from the north, south, east end west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the sRe, and representative News of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph p 3) ProtectLocahon(describe) ~~~ DF >~A~sT ~V~tiIUE NQ1eTN or- ~- r4 ~ S of Vi ~ To~~~ 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet d necessary). 1 / ~ 27 ~ 12 ~ "• 3 T 3Z '5) Gross Sfte Area (adsq R) l 3~ 31p ¢ s F , 2 • ~ q _ '8) Net Sfte Area (total she size minus area o/public streets 8 proposed ded~cabons). g3 7 0 / 2,~~ per. 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change whrch would affect the proied site (attach adddronel sheet flnecessary) NIA 8) Include a description of all permits whrch will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the project: 7~~[t s~t3DIJ~~IOI~t ~T~z,~ct Mite ~ L~srGn~ R~~l Ew BV~i-i~it~G PE(LM(T5 ) Pd55/I3G ~ ~Zt~ tPE~•loy,~k-[_ 9) Describe the physical setting of the sde as tt exists before the pro/act including information on topography, sort stablldy, plants and animals, mature frees, trans and roads, dreinage courses, end scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (rncludmg age and conddion) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of srgnficant features described In addition, cite all souroes of infonnatron (~ e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) ~r T ~ 16 C~S~K ~~M ~A~S ~ /-I-C c CSS l /3Lr- d'/ • i4 ~o / F r F[A,/t POLE 1/~lM[ K (,UE WI L ~ CONy~ieT S7i2i1cTUQ~t ~FS)DF~C'F (30+~ y~ a~~ 1 f GIJFsT ffOrres~ EnvironmentallnfoFormt doc Page 2 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM .GD~.c~t/s /YA~ T~l~,¢L Cli2~~~ 10) Descnbe the known culturel and/or hrstoncal aspects of the site Cite all sources of Information (books, published reports end oral history). 11) Descnbe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) end how they will effect proposed uses ' T~"~ G ~ /~! ~A"S / /~~ t /1"~((J (V F~}t'f`C(5 T _ ,~ -" /~ M~cDt%,rP/}7C IVo(~~/x r544T !-DcJ~ r.~,.e T_ /[[' f?rf~f ./vP.f./_/S~RIY (~ rV~hl SIT~iS S~ 13/-Irk >(2v~-t SDK f~I' 12) Descnbe the proposed project in detail This should provide en adequate descnpbon of the sde rn terms o/ uft~mate use that will result from the proposed probed lndreate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach addrbonal sheet(s) d necessary -Int-FL.9c~ ~ ~cr~crt-~ - r,4-~-tr~Y ~2~.s ln~r~~~s I~~~ ~c~G~~D Fob 7'f-lF r~l~/ L~~"• EnvironmentallnfoFormt tloc Page 3 of 9 L~ ~'r Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM lvc°~ st rc IIA~,~~ % LA~f~ 7~ Flo!? 7~(~ W,c S~~_ ~lI~~NT/~L ~~ ~f} ? ~ S/,yrr~r No SlGir~li~~c,~~ l ' ~ ~~'~ 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ed7 w~ ~(~(SuLg7 6h~ ~ ~ %f~4Jll~ 41~~ - '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees llt- 17J • Indicate any bodes of water (mcludmg domestic water suppbes) into which the sde drams EnvnonmentallnfoFormt doc Page 4 of 9 ~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including rn/ormabon on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeroial, etc ), intensify o/land use (one-/amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc J and scale o/development (height, /rontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) 15) Indicate the type o/short-tent and long-term noise to be generated, Including source and amount How will these Horse levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods o/soundproofing are proposed? ~l~(S7~11C Ti ~~ I`I d iSE ,4r1" SD~lrr ~ ~l~1 T, ~'h i ~ 18) Indicate expected amount of watel'usage (See Attachment A for usage e~Umates) For further clanficaUon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Di nct at 987-2591 ~~ ~ ~ a Residential (gaUday) ~~ 9 ~ak~ a (gaUday) 7d~ y / v '~R~~t%~' ~ i b Commeroial/Ind (gaUday/ac) ~_ Peak use (gaUmm/ac) N i 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tarjk Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a santtary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clamscation, please contact the Cucamonga County Wafer Distnct at 987-2591 ,, ' (l a Residential (gaUday) ~ ~~!~C7 ~`~'~` / Fb~ b. CommerciaUlndustnal (gaUday/ac) ' RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residenbal untts Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot sae • 13,//S 13 (~ ' ~ Q to 4 S. ~• Attached (indicate whether unffs are rental or for sale unks) ~ Sp (,~ • 21) Anticipated range o(sale pnces and/or rents ~! Sale Pnce(s) $ ~ ? ~ ~~~ O to $ '7A7~ / D D p Rent (per month) $~_ tv $ N /'t 22) Specdy number of bedrooms by and type ~1 L~f s ~ ~G p~~ ~ i 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type ~l1/~ -T • EnvironmenlaflnfoForml doc Page 5 of 9 ~~ Created on 5!2212002 4 09 PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be resfdmg wdhm the pro/ect Confad the appropnate School Dfstncts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary ~ a b. Junior High 5 ' c Senior High / , COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commerofal, mdustnal or insbtubonaj uses. 26) Total floor area o/ commerofal, mdustnal, or mstrtudgnal uses by type. 27) Indicate hours of operation• J 28) Number of employees Total Maximum Sh/ft Time o(Maxfmum Shpt. 29) Provide breakdown of antfapated Job classifications, mcludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an Indicadon of the rate of hire for each classficabon (attach adddional sheet !f necessary) 30) Estimation of [he number of workers to be hired that currently reside m the City '31) For commerofal and mdustnal uses only, militate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be ven(ed through the South Coast Afr Dualrty Management Dfstnct, at (818) 572-6283) • EnvironmentallnfoForml dot Page 6 of 9 ` r r Created on 5!22!2002 4 09 PM ,,y, , ALL PROJECTS ~ 32) Have the wafer, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their ability to • provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect7 It so, please indicate their response Y~~S 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic ~ ' matenals? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, redioacfrve substances; pestrcides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other Hammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/the above Please list the matenals end describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, Hknown , ~o~1E , 34) ill the proposed protect Jnvolve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s, including but not limked to those examples listed above? If yes, prowde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of d~sposa/. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans ~ 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this protect to the best ofmy a611rty, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and corral tot he best of my knowledge and belief 1 further understand that addrbonal information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the C1ty olRancho Cucamonga ` Date• ~ 3 Signature• ~~ / /~ n Tdle• ~ ~ l ' ~~ ~h.~~ f'rt(;n ' l~vl • Env,ronmentallnfoFOnn1 doc Page 7 of 9 ~~ ~ Created on Sr22/2002 4 09 PM ATTACHMEN 1 "A , r~ LJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga County Water District February 2003) Water Usage • Single-Family Multi-Family Neighborhood Commercial 'General Commercial Offtce Professlonal I nstttutionaUG overnment Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (dtstnbutlon) Sewer Flows Single-Family Multi-Family General Commerclal Offtce Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distrlbutton) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/umt (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gaVday/unit (tenant) 1750 gaVday/unit (tenant) 2020 gaVday/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/umt (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gaVday/acre InstitutionaUGovernment 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gallday/acre Source• Cucamonga County Water Dtstnct Engtneenng & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 EnvironmentallnfoForml doc C "~~ Page B of 9 Created on 5/30/2002 8 29 AM MI 1 Ml.nmGn ~ o hool fees: f t d ~ • o paymen sc Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount an Elementary School Districts ~ , Alta Loma ~ ~ , 9350 Base Llne Road, Swte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 , (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ' (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 ' (909) 899-2451 High School • Chaffey High School ' 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • ~ EnwronmentallnfoFonnt doc Page 9 of 9 Created on 5!22/2002 409 PM l J ~`f~`i,~C le G:~~`%'P~ /<' lei ,~ ~I`(~ F~ ~~ • I~+i 1 I r -7 1 ~~.~ ~- Sk /G~ ~'N LIe If'C' (~ 1 ~l L- }~~ ~ ~r ~' , ~r' °' • • ~~ ~e atr,~~a~ lis~ ~:-y~ ; f i~ M ~ic~ Fi ~'t'SE ~ C ~ ~ cl ~,~~'~`~, c-a~ City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Design Review DRC2004-01198 2. Related Flles: n/a 3. bescription of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 - KAUT - A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6 single-family lots m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Related Fde Design Review DRC2004-01198 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01198 -LILY KAUT- The review of site plans and elevations for 6 single-family homes on 2 99 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-X21-33 and 37 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Ltly Kaut 10630 Towne Center Dnve #105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The property is surrounded by residential property to the north, west, and south. To the east, there are two vacant properties, both zoned for single-family development, abutting East Avenue The subiect property contains two non-historic homes that will be demolished 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Cameron (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• None • • C ~~ ~,) , mmai a[uoy ror TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-01178 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: • CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water Distrxa , EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases , PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB-Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast'Air Quality Management Distnct~ SW PPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Mode17G , ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED • • vuy vi nni iii w vu~.ni i vii iya Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would tre potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact,"~"Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,` or °Less Than-Significant-Impact° as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Respurces (x) Air Quality (x) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (x) Hydrology 8 Water Quality ~ (x) Land Use & Planning (x) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation ~ () Transportationlrraffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (x) I find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the prolect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared, Prepared By ~V °v~^ ~ ' °L{MQ~ ~'t'Y,L~ - Reviewed By / Date• lR 7 b Date ~F 7 C ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 3 Less Th°n Sipnifc°nt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources• PP 9 '~°"2811y sipnpm°nl wnn Mlppe°on rn°" SlpMfic°nl N° I ect Inco ratatl I I ct EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project , a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highways c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundmgs~ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: , a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site. The site is not withm a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east The casual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used, in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of~light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses • • C ag • Initial Study for '~ I City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 i Page 4 I ~ ~ Less Tften I SIBnlftceM Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources PP 9 Potsntleny sonmcem wttn lNtlpaLOn mnn slQnlrcant No en Inco reteE I act Imoed Comments: , a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance withinlthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging froth 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR Identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. • c) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east The nearest agricultural use is more than 3 miles southwest of the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are~anticipated 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any ,av quality standard or contribute O (/) O ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtecticnable odors affecting a substantial O O O (/) number of people Comments: • a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Pian FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding ~ a~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 5 Less Than SiOMheant Lea Issues and Su ortin Information Sources• PP 9 FoteMial~r Sipn~ficent Wah Mwyanon Then sionifiwa No limed Into retetl I 1 Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of~ the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions assoaated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not 'violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels • • 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained es per • manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • 2) Prior to the Issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Afr l]uality Management District (SCA~MD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) ' All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCA~MD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over • extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. C • Indial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC7r004-001198 i Page 6 , ~•~ rnan , slpn,l,cant Las: Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Patam~a~~y S,pnifcant w,m M,tlpaYOn Tnan S,prnOCant ~ No ~ ect Into retetl ~ ~ en • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City It silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as 'a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending, upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. ' 6) The site shall be treated with water or other' soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW~CB]) dally to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~p) emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. , 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWOCB) shall be applied to alt inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMip emissions. • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. , 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,p) would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatvely significant if they cannot be mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less-than-significant The' following mitigation measures shall be implemented u 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. ~-3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 7 Leis Than Sipnlrment Ltm Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g aptanually Sipnlficant wnn Mltipetlon Th~ SlpNficeM No I eM InCO retail 1 1 C After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development,would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identrfies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child ~ care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obfectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wddlrfe corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance C~ • • C~ • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 City of~Rancho Cucamonga i Page 8 I ~ Less men I Sipmhcent Less Issues and Supportng Informatwn Sources Potenti811Y wnn men . SiprvficaM Milipevon Sipnificenl No 1 C Into reteE 1 C Irrpect f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect well not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources. • d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) Although there are numerous mature trees surrounding the protect site, there are no heritage trees actually on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site Is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: • a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact c~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 9 LESS Then Sipnlficenl Lea Issues and Su ortm information Sources PP g Po<em,e~ly Significant wrtn Mrtipebon rnen Spnlfiwlt Nc I act Inro retaa I 1 b) There are no known archaeological sites or re§ources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR' (Section 5.11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented , 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporatign of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important,'and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the. City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossil) are encountered before or during grading, the developer shall retain a qualified paleontologist to conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • • • C-3y • Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001 1 9 8 i Page 10 I ~ Less Then I ~ Sipnl4cent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g FWenaelly Sipnliment wun Mnipeuon rnan Slgnihcent No ed Inco retetl Im act I ect • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. , • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the (grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). ~ Submlt a summary report to City of 'Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. ' ' d) The prdposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No • evidence is in place to suggest ,the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is regwred for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are antlclpated • 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Prlolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O (/) In) Seismic-related ground fatlure, including O O O (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soli erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) C ~s Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 11 ~~ m,~ slomr~n ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fclenllelly $Ipnif¢ent wnn MIIIpeYOn Tn.n SiOn~ficenl No I ed Inco oreteE 1 1 en c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () . () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of, the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidencd, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as d®fined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property ' e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewaters Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and d is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is d in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red HIII Fault, according to the ' General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes within 3 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles northerly of the site These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0 to 7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 12 miles easterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing up to M„, B 2 earthquakes, is 14 mites easterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant b) The proposed prolect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site sods The Rancho Cucamonga area is subiect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this prolect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAt]MD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. /_ ~~ w • • • 1,), , • Initial Study for ~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC~004-001198 i Page 12 i ~ Less Tften I Significant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Paenozllr SiBnthcent w~te Mifipabon man SiOnlfcaM I No ed Inco orete0 I ed I c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5'1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tufunga Loamy Sand association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipbted. d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial sod deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga Loamy Sand association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and ' General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 Theses soils are typically used for irrigated crops such as citrus and ruhoff is slow to very slow No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanl~$ or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed J • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/act a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably ,foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release' of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adapted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicmity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an O O O (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ C ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT76578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 13 ' less met, sipnifsent Lela Issues and Supporting Information Sources. amemreny $,pnllcent wnn M,epaeon Than 9pMficant No 1 en into oretetl I h I Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or,disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that 'any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Pian which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will ' reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant'impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site. The project site is located within 3/4 mile to the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The project site is located approximately 3 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated , f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wlldland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • • C 3~ • • • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT76578 & DRC?r004-001198 City of Rancho Cucamonga i Page 14 I ~ ~ Less Than I Sipnllicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially s~pmucam With auepaaon, Than sipnincaol iNa I h Inco rateE I act InoazS 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the/5ro/ect, a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) requirements , b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or Interfere ~ () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit In aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existmg drainage pattern of thel O O , O (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a mahher, which would result In substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing dramag~ pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface ~ runoff in a manner, which would result In flooding on- or off-sde~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existmg or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) ' () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project Is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, regwring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits C'7 I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 15 ' I.asa loon s~anlrrom ~>: Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PrnenLelly ¢ipnifcant won MlllpaLan Tnan &pdficnnt No 1 Inro ted 1 act I aq Construction actiwties covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit regwres all dischargers to comply with the following during construction actrwties, including site clearance and grading , Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP), that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from mowng off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Pertorm inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment regwres an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are requred to prepare a SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the protect will be requved to prepare a SWPPP during construction actiwties, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant will prepare a WQMP poor to submittal of construction drawings that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oiUgnt separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic patking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Achwtres i) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance • • • C -`~ l,` I • Irntial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC?r004-001198 i Page 16 I ~ Less TI~Bn ' Sipnihcant lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ ryfi~ ; p M,`"`" pebon, Th8" Srynifcent I No Broad Inco retaC I ect Imoacl program shall be included to en;ure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris br sediment from the site when there Is rainfall or other runoff. ~ I 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in ' order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site, Post- Construction Operational. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water duality Management Plan shall be prepared prior to submittal of Buliding and Safety 4ivision, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing • the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be 'submitted to the Clty for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. I b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the C+ty's water is currently providefi from ground water +n the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it intertere with recharge because it is not within an area des+gnated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant • d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river ~-~~ Inibai Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 17 Lees men ' s~m~rrem Lees Issues and Supporting Information Sources $;~,~`~~'; a„~,o„ s~ , ,,, i inco t~ ~ i n All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the building Offical and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are~anticipated. e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect will not result m substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bulding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or oft-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result m a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows dunng a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mdigation measures shall be implemented 1) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Ouallty Management Plan (WOMP), Including a prolect description and identifying Best Management Practices,(BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structure) and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area ~s flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected • • ~ -rya I,y I • Irntial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC?r004-001198 i Page 18 I ~ Less Then I S~pnlficent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP fd PmenYatly Slprvhcent win, MILgeOM rnen Slprvficent 1 No I ecl Into retatl 1 act Ir,ped t) There are no oceans, Takes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were ,cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls~have'been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established commu(tity~ () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdictioh over thel protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effects ' c) Conflict with any applicable habitat oonservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation piano • Comments: ' a) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential develbpment to the north, south, and west, with two vacant properties to the east This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north and south The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated , b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential in the Etiwanda Overlay District The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan u 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect. a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the ' residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan C-~3 Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 19 Lass m~ SlOnifirsM Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources °~~;;~~I; $p M„wnn OaM1an """ Stprvncant NO I act Into retell I I Comments: ' a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate, Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery srte; therefore, there is no impact. ' 11. ~ NOISE. Would the protect result in• a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protects ' d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase. in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• ~ ' a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding the City standard of 60dBA between 10 00 p m and 7 00 a m ,and exceeding the City standard of 65dBA between 7 00 a m and 10 00 p m ,according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 because of traffic noise from the I-15 and I-210 Freeways 1) Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the project site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vi/cinity of the protect C. -r-/ U • • • • Initial Study for ~ City of 'Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC7r004-001198 i Page 20 I ~ Lass Than t ' Slpnthcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Palenaelly Spndicant won Mlllpeson roan Slpnllsant INa Im an Inco rated I an I act d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indica)es that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding Clty standards The following measures ,are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts ~ ~ , 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday: , 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section X7.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. The preceding mitigation measures wdl reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The fallowing mitigation measures shall then be required , 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 700 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 4 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • ~Y,.~` initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT76578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 21 ' Less Tflen Significant Lev Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Palamially $IONficeN wttn MlfipaUon man SlpNflunt No I eet Into teE I acl 1 ect 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect ' a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, e8her () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other mfrastructure)~ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing ' elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected. c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial ' adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilites, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of • which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other pertormance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protections () () () , (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks O O U (/) e) Other public facihties~ O O O (/) Comments• a) The site, located south of Victoria Avenue and west of East Avenue, would be served by a Fire Station 176 located on East Avenue approximately 1 2 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site i/s'w/ithin an area that is regularly patrolled I/~ • • u I,y 1 • Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC?r004-001198 i Page 22 I ~ ' Less Than I SipnM1Cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g aa~,naly Sipninwnt wnn MitlpaYan, Than Sipnincent I No 1 atl Inro oretatl I ad Ilmazt c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffgy Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have be9n notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the develpper to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant The protect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the Issuance of building permits No InYpacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 mile from the protect site. The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause'a decline in ~ ' the levels of service, which could cause, the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilife exlsting public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library • space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City, and is planned to open in August 2006 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the factlity would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated • b) See a) response above ~ ~~ initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 23 ~ rn~ ' Si9mtleent Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°'°Mielly SipnifirsM w"n MlhpaLOn n'°" SiprnprtM No Irroecl Inco ratetl I I 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect• ' a) Cause an Increase in traffic, which Is substantia'I in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (I e , result in a substantial Increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at Intersections) ' b) Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change In air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () () (/) ' feature (e.g ,sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) , or Incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result In Inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O (.) (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 58 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect includes the development of six single-family homes. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family home will generate 9.75 trips daily As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development well contribute to the traffic load In the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated. The protect is in an area that Is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial Increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at Intersections The protect site will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the Clty has established a transportation development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to Issuance of building permds. Fees are used to fund roadway Improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No Impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family home well generate 9 75 two-way peak hour trips dally, therefore, the total protect would generate an estimated 4 5 and 8 vehicle trips during am peak hour and pm peak hour, respectively In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local turisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation Improvement protects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development Impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact • L J • C-~~' I) • Initial Study for ~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC?r004-001198 i Page 24 I ~ ~ ' Less Tnon 1 Sipndrtam Lela Issues and Su ortin Informatwn Sources PP 9 PofaNlally Sipnifcant wren Mltlpelmn Than SlpnKCeM I No I ed Ineo retatl 1 acl I ect Analysis reporting requirement This'protect yvill be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee pribr to issuance of building permits The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvemegts existing The protect will not negatively impact the level,of service standards on adtacent arterials. The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipatetl c) Located approximately 4.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly yieveloped The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses 'The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are antipipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Codo and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated ' g) The protect design includes, or the protect'will~ be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) • 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect• a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments L -~/9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-001198 Page 25 Lem Then SlOniheent Lem Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Po~elucem slve MitWenun a sl~~„ o Ne ~ C Into retail ~ ~ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () , () . (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste ' disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () ~ () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empre Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is requved to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located withrn City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The protect is regwred to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Offiaal • and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered sigmticant d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficent water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed protect ~s served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located w~thm Rancho ' Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. u cT 1,), • • Initial Study for ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 & DRC2,004-001198 i Page 26 1 ~ ' Less Than $IgnlflCalll Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources ~ PP g Pmemimly Sipnl9cent Wlih Mingasoro Than Sigmficem INo I act Into retell I act 1 C 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially ~ reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or ' wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or , endangered plant or animal, or etimmate important examples of the mator periods of California history or ' prehistory I b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively, considerable° means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection ' with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current .protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either duectly or indvectly~ Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City 1 of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, d is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for signficant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics, and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required • c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once G~J f Initial Study for ~ Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga • TENTATNE TRACT MAP SU9TT16678 & DRC20pdA1178 Pt3ga 27 ' construction activities were completed. The InMa1 Study identdrec( potentially signfflcarrt ' impaot8 gapoeiated with the exposure Of people to Increased noise levels. Mdigation meaeures contained m thus InRlel Study will ensure iinpaeta ere at le9s•Mtan-Sl~nlfCatlt levels. QARLJER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may ba used where, Pursuant t0 the tienng, program EIR, or other CECA process, one or more effects have bean adequatay analyzed In an'earller EIR er Negative Declaration per Sealan 1~3(c)(9)(D). The effects Identified above for this Propot were whhln the stops of and adequately anatyzad in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to appllcaWe legal standards, and such efreots were addressed by mlhgetron measures based an the esrller analysis. Tha folbwing earlier analyses were ulnized h1 cempleting this Inftlal Study and are available for review in the Clty of Ranehe Cucamonga, Plemm~g Divlsron offloes,10500 Cline Center Dnve (cheek all tlrat apply): {x] General Plan FEIR (3CN#2000081027, Certified October 17, 2007) (>n Etiwenda Specdic Plan EIR (8CN @821801, canitied JufY 6, 19&3) APPLICAhR CERTIFICATION I rarefy that I am the applicant }or the project described in this Ininel Study. I adcnowladge that I have • read this Initial Study antl the proposed mftigahon measures Fufttieh, I have rovised the proleot plans er proposals andlor hereby agree to rile proposed mityadon measures to avoid the efleeL4 or miggate the effects to a polrtt where clearry rw sign'rfioent environmental effects would oxur. Date: _ ~ ~,~ ~~ Apptlcanrs Signature. PnM Name aitd Tlile: Ll~d ~ ~(~.3'PL/1~ ~• C-Sa- TO 3~Jtid LR0b66606 EZ:bL 900Z/L0/90 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Development Review DRC2004-01198 Public Review Period Closes: July 12, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Lily Kaut Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 6956 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-33 and 37 Project Description: A request to subdivide 2 99 acres of land into 6single-family lots and the review of site plans and elevations for 6single-family homes in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the envvonment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. August 23, 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By • C-53 • RESOLUTION NO 06-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578, ON 2 99 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED W EST OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF VICTORIA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-121-33 AND 37. A Recitals 1 Lily Kaut filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 12th day of July 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing 3 The applicant withdrew their related application for Design Review DRC2004-01198 on July 26, 2006 4 On the 23rd day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing • on that date 5 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on July 12, 2006, and August 23, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street, with a street frontage of approximately 330 feet and lot depth of 331 feet and is presently vacant land, and b. The property to the north, south, and west of the subject site are single-family homes, the property to the east is vacant, and c The application contemplates the subdivision of land into 6 lots that meet or exceed the standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan • C-5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 2 • 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or then habitat, and e Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f. The design of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the envvonmental assessmentfor • the application, the Planning Commission finds thatthere is no substantial evidence thatthe prolect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the prolect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined tha4, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the prolect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (Q that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the prolect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the prolect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance • with the mitigation measures during prolect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the prolect C-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578-LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 • Page 3 d Pursuant to the regwrements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wtldlife depends Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based, is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planninc Department 1) The applicant shall provide written permission from the adjacent • property owners for any off-site grading prior to issuance of Grading Permits Engineering Department 1) Street "A" shall be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including curb and gutters, a c pavement, street lights, street trees, sidewalk, drive approaches, traffic signs and stripings The cul-de-sac bulb shall be per City Standard 111 The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 regarding privately maintained landscaping and irrigation along then side yards on Street "A " Improvements are to be installed to the street curb Plans for these areas will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department, with exception to street trees If the owners are not willing to negotiate said improvements, install rockscape on the parkway, per City Standards Provide drive approaches for the existing "not-a-part" residences to Street "A " • The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to • recover the amount for installation of permanent public improvements from future development as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APNs 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 C-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 4 • If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 2) The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owners of APNs 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 an exchange of corner cutoffs dedications on East Avenue for sidewalks and curb returns on both corners. Remove or relocate the existing power pole located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Street "A." 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the protect side of Street "A"shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site most westerly on Street "A" to the first pole off-site Street "A" on East Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first All services crossing Street "A" shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted amount for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on either side of the street fronting APNs 0227-121-34 and 0227-121-36 If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement • agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) Developmentwithin Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 8 is required to install master plan storm drains and interim basins Interim Basin No 5 and the storm drain in East Avenue were both constructed by Tract 15912, south of the subtect tract. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 can satisfy its condition to install storm drams through the payment of fees However, those fees do not cover the interim basin The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement for the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related faalities (outlet, etc) They must request said reimbursement within 6 months of the public storm drain facilities being accepted by the City Therefore, this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre in Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 with the City for the purpose of reimbursing the developer of Tract 15912 If reimbursement is not requested within 6 months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned to developer of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 5) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of East Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of Building Permits The amount shall be one-half of the actual cost of undergrounding of said utilities fronting East Avenue 66-foot frontage The reimbursement fee ~s unavailable at this time, • since Tract 16189 is still under construction C ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 • Page 5 6) Reimburse adjacent developers for oversizing of interim drainage facilities 7) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the application for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for technical plan check Environmental Mitigation Air Qualty 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be • utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed • excavated soil during and after the end of work periods C-58' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 6 • • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel • powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • C `J' l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 • Page 7 • Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) if any paleontological resource (i e, plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The • paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum • Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and R/W~ OCB) daily to reduce Fine Particulate C~'~0~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 8 Matter (PM,o) emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Actiwties 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) • that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site • C -~D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 • Page 9 Post-Construction Actiwties 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the W ater Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc dated December 10, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a prolect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of • Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the W aste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bulding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Prior to issuance of Grading and Building Permits, the applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the prolect site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at • the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building L-~0 a- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-65 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 -LILY KAUT August 23, 2006 Page 10 Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thatthe foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • C - (03 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and DRC2004-01198 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the *(Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared incompliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 t/' ~0 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT16578 AND DRC2004-01198 August 23, 2006 • Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is notoccurring afterwritten notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authorityto hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff time to monitorand report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances regwring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. u e-~ ~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578 and Development Review DRC2004-01198 Applicant: Initial Study Prepared by: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner Date: Mav 31, 2006 ... -. - - -. - .. Air-C~uality a r ~ < ~r 'i... -f!~?v2'x„_ ,_ .f h'7y ,,. x ,, ~.., k „a. ,e,x a.xc+z€.3c. - .i _, w,'-e'~ 9. .. i. ~~,a_ All construction equpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly sernced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be uhhzed, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Rewew of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of Plans A/C Z4 1 of 8 ~ .. - ... - -. . . Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of Plans A/C . Z4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule actro~ties to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carved over to adfacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A/C 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of Plans A 4 regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters • 2~ • - -. . . . . . . . . .. . All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping CulfuraLResources;~ ~ ~ 5° ~'' ~ ~ , ~ ' v ~~ -"~'~ -,-`- If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construcfion activities and to take appropriate measures to protector preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Revew of AID 3/4 sties from demohfion or significant modification Report wdhout an opportunely for the Cely to establish els archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with anginal illustra4ons to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 1 3 of 8 .. -. .. - If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossil) CP B Review of A/D 4 are encountered before or during grading, the developer Report shall retain a qualified paleontologist to conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submd a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate W here mtigation mondonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal constructOn delay, to the site full-hme during the interval of earth-disturbing acliwUes • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actiwhes Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the tend • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to Report an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. ~G ology andSods . shall be treated with water or other The site BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible • 4~ • .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactroe construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions r ~-, : .. ,., ~.~,., sere ?~,'Pny r ' 4` Hydr`ology,an'd,WateGlualtty,,, ` ~ ~.1 - ddVn'ir L'~ti~I:F-. , i ~ ~p~ unti ~R i J~~, 15 •1 ~& ~~ - !}~ ;~.,d ~ ~ h ~• s..~f hi ~IL~`~, .,b W' - ..~~ ~'~aN ~ ny^t.~`^'. .`~"~ n "raz e~• ,F~`~i- .; ~'';~°~ Structures to retain preapdation and runoff on-site shall BO/CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 be integrated into the design of the protect where During appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize Construction runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge - basins Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submd to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actiwties entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical r- t C 5 of 8 .. ... -. -. .. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 ' the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activdies are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared prior to submittal of Building and Safety Division, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits \` s • 6~ • .. . . .. . . .. .. . . - Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to complywith obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the t NPDES General Construction Permit ~ ~ p ~'Noise~ ~~is.,,z, _1 ~ , , ,.~- , _ _ v~k ,i,~~ ~, ~~ ~a, ~ ~M„ _ _ .,~~. _ ,~~~ _ Prior to issuance of grading and bwiding permits, the CP/BO B Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit an acoustical study prepared by and during licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise inspection impacts upon the protect site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A/C 2/4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7of8 .- .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A/C 2/4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hue a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report then findings to the Building Offiaal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A 4 as possible in the first phase Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the CP C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings jn~ 17~ Key to Checklist Abbreviations • S ~ • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16578 SUBJECT: SIX SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ONLY APPLICANT: LILY KAUT LOCATION: EAST AVENUE/SOUTH OF VICTORIA ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is flied with the Clty Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 2 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the • time of building permit issuance SC-1-OS Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT16578Std Cord 8~ ~ipc Protect No SUBTT16678 Completion Date 3 Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map • D. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of ~ aaF nn nrinr to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, • e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to _/~_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements F. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to constructicn All plans shall be ~_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTT16578) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in • effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTT16578Std Corte 8,?.~3~ Protect No SUBTT16576 Completion Date avallabllity of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts • 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or motor addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may Include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demclition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit Issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to Issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays G. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property Ilne clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ H. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California 8ullding Code, Clty Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial • conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A Bolls report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/~_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of bullding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal Is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed well generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer 6 If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall _/_/_ occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per Clty Standards ~_/_ r~ LJ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT165785td Coryt Q~ doc Protect No SUBTT76578 Comolehon Data Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map J. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street Ilghts, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88.557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail i Other STREET "A" X X X X X X 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Pricr to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer -/-/- / / • -!-/. -/-/- -/~_ CJ ~~. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT76678Std CpnJ~,2~ doc Protect No SUBTT16578 Completion Date Notes • 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a Ilne item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans • The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size ~ty STREET "A' CERSIS CANADENSIS EASTERN ROSEBUD 5' 25'O C 15GAL Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the City Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only K. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer L. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall • be installed as required by the City Engineer -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/. -/~- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stt Rpt\SUBTT16578Std Cond 8-23 doc C 7~ Protect No SUBTT16578 Comoletion Date Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas M. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final tract map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them N. General Requirements and Approvals Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance if no map is involved A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -/-/- • -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~-/~ -/-/- • 6 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT16578Std Cond 8~ J~~ aw4_, , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District .' g ~_ , ry~~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS March 29, 2006 Kaut Tract (6) SFR West side of East Ave south of Victoria SUBTT16578 & DRC2004-01198 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet • b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Droision to meet operational needs of the Fire District v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The requred fire flow for this protect is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minmum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square mch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fve flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. •4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site C -~~ FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application • Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee ' FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is regwred prior to the issuance of grading or bwlding permits Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. • Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 3 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry C --~~ 2 s~r~~ DATE August 23, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH - A request to approve a new master plan for the phased development of various church faalities, including classroom buildings and education/retreat center, and • including specific design approval of a two-story multi-purpose building, and approval to keep three temporary modular classrooms on 10 22 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 9974 19th Street - APN 1076-051-05, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 1076-061-10, 11, and 12 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Descriotion Solid Ground Brethren in Christ Church (formerly known as Alta Loma Brethren In Christ Church) is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a new master plan to improve the existing campus for its church and private school over the next 20-25 years The proposed master plan environs the construction of five new buildings ranging in size from 6,000 to 32,000 square feet in size, three building additions to the existing bwldings, and increased on-site parking Ultimately, upon completion of permanent classroom space, the church will remove the three temporary modular classrooms The church is not proposing an increase in its sanctuary seating capacity, and the historic Goerlitz House (formerly known as the EI Rancho Grande Wedding Chapel) is being renovated by the church for eventual use as a spiritual retreat center, where religious seminars/workshops, small social events/receptions, weddings, and tours may occur The new Conditional Use Permit will be valid for 5 years, meaning that the church has 5 years to obtain Building Permits If the projects are not completed or initiated within the 5-year time frame, the church will have to reapply for a new Conditional Use Permit every • 5 years to continue implementing its master plan The church estimates that the remaining bwldings will take between 8-19 years to complete, although implementation could be accelerated if funds are raised Moreover, the proposed addition of the ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 Page 2 classroom buildings anticipates a desired expansion of the current private school use (preschool to 8th grade) to eventually include grades 9 through 12 (high school) A modification to the Conditional Use Permit will also be regwred when the church determines it is ready to implement the high school portion into their prvate school function As a part of this review, the church is requesting design approval for Bwlding F, the first protect to be implemented with the master plan Bwlding F, a multipurpose building, will be located at the center of the "T" shaped property on a portion of an existing athletic field Construction of Building F is divided into three phases as indicated in the table above When fully completed, Bwlding F will be 32,200 square feet in size The two-story bwlding setback will be approximately 60 feet from the west and east property lines and approximately 490 feet away from 19th Street. The design of Bwlding F was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on August 1, 2006, as discussed below The following table provides a breakdown of the elements envisioned by the master plan and the anticipated timeframe for their completion in the future ~°BuUBin . Descri`tion ~ ~ S"fia~e~eet~A7life -. Tar et;Dafe A Second Floor Interior Remodel - 2025 Second Floor Addition to Existin Buildin 1,600 s uare feet 2030 B Second Floor Addition to Existin Bwldin 3,116 s uare feet 2030 C Sanctua Buildin Existin - Com leted D New Classroom Bwldin -two-sto 15,396 s uare feet 2014 E New Classroom Bwlding -two-story (Replace 2 Existing modular unit 960 square feet 5,040 square feet 2014 Phase I -Classrooms 4,300 s uare feet 2006-7 F Phase II -Classrooms/Computer Lab (Replace 3 Existing Modular Units ~ 4,320 s uare feet 9,507 square feet 2008 Phase III -Multi ur ose Room/G m 18,398 s uare feet 2011 G Renovation of Goerlitz House underwa - 2006 Goerlitz House Addition 2,648 s uare feet 2020 H New Educational Buildin 10,000 s uare feet 2030 J New Educational Buildin 17,500 s uare feet 2025 a~~w,~,~~, i~:~~'.~rv;,-r~~Tot"al-~`~°~>~.~~-~r--;=~",~,*.~ ~_!;~.~';;a~87,505s `uare'feet~"•,.=,=fw Contm ent u on funds being reised for the individual ro ects B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning • The protect site is located on the north side of 19th Street approximately half-way between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues and is zoned Medium (M) Residential. The surrounding properties are zoned as follows • p ~- • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 Page 3 North - I-210 Freeway separated from the site by an existing sound wall South - Low (L) Residential -Single-Family homes East - Medium (M) Residential -apartments West - Medium-High (MH) Residential -apartments C. General Plan Designations Protect Site - Medwm Residential (8-14 Dwelling Units per acre) North - I-210 Freeway South - Low Residential (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 Dwelling Units per acre) West - Medwm-High Residential (14-24 Dwelling Units per acre) D Site Characteristics The site gradually slopes/drains to the southwest to the existing infrastructure The City records indicate that Solid Ground Brethren In Christ Church (Formerly known as Alta Loma Brethren In Chnst Church) was approved at this site in 1979 In 1983, a Conditional Use Permit for the private school was approved (CUP 63-09) for up to 100 pupils In 1985, a 2,800-square foot classroom building was approved. The existing sanctuary and parking was approved in 1989 and subsequently constructed • (Development Review 88-19) Currently, the site is developed with a worship bwlding, accessory bwldings for the private school, and on-site parking In the northwest corner of the property is the historic Goerlitz House (formerly known as the EI Rancho Grande Wedding Chapel) Parking Calculations The master plan provides for adequate on-site parking in compliance with the applicable regwrements as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for church uses (public assembly) and private schools The church parking is based on the seating capacity of the main worship (sanctuary) bwlding at one space for every four seats, while private schools require two spaces per classroom The seating capacity at the church is currently at 540 seats and requires 135 spaces, while the 13 classrooms in the private school require 26 spaces The parking is based upon the highest demand, hence, 135 parking spaces are regwred. Currently, the site has 167 spaces and exceeds the parking requirements for each of the existing uses Moreover, there is no overlap in the church and private school uses Except for maintaining a small administrative office during the week, the church holds its main services in the evenings and weekends when the school is not operating When Bwlding F is completed, parking for the entire site will be based on the size of the multipurpose room (public assembly portion of the bwlding, because it will generate a greater parking requirement than the main sanctuary) As such, the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required will be 189 On-site parking will be increased to a total of 197 spaces when Bwlding F is completed • p3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 Page 4 ANALYSIS. A General The applicant is requesting approval of a new church master plan, and specific design approval for a new multi-purpose Building F Overall, staff finds the proposed master plan for development of the site consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the applicable development criteria contained in the Development Code Church and private school uses are allowed in residential areas subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit The existing development on the site is consistent with City requirements, and the proposed improvements will meet current requirements such as setbacks, budding height, and provision of on-site parking The improvements to the site will enable the church to make better use of the site and improve its facilities for both the church congregation and its prroate school At 10 22 acres, the shape and size of the site is sufficient to more than adequately accommodate the proposed improvements, including the provision of required on-site parking and efficient on-site arculation without major difficulties or risk of over bwlding the site Moreover, the existing church is located on and has access to fully developed public streets of the appropriate size and configuration to accommodate the existing and improved uses • Finally, the proposed improvements will not divide an established community or pose adverse impacts to the adjacent neighborhoods/improvements within the surrounding area Moreover, the project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals As such, the existing church and proposed improvements will be consistent with the land use policies of the City's General Plan and do not interfere with other policies for environmental protection. As such, no adverse impacts related to the proposed improvement to the church facility are anticipated B Design Review Committee• On August 1, 2006, the Design Review Committee approved the master plan concept and the exterior design of Budding F. C Techrncal Review Committee On August 1, 2006, the Committee approved the plans D Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project The initial study was released for pubic comment on July 20, 2006 Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to short-term air quality, aesthetics, noise, hydrology and water quality, and geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period • and of the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring D-4 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 Page 5 Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the protect NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Notice of a neighborhood meeting on Thursday, June 8, 2006, was sent out to the surrounding property owners The meeting was held at the church site, and no one from the public attended Moreover, no comments from the adfacent property owners or the public have been received PUBLIC NOTICE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site to properties to the south, east, and west A total of 40 notices were mailed STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Development Review DRC2006-00240 for the new master plan and Building F at the Solid Rock Brethren in Christ Church property by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, ~ ~. ~~% Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT MD/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Master Site Plan Exhibit C - Bwlding F -Phasing Plans Exhibit D -Landscaping Plans Exhibit E -Initial Study Part II Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00240 • ~~ 1 VIII -_ __ f~l _~_~ ~~ i ~__~-"_- ..L.~ ~~o ~, ` ~-- I • -1 ~ ` 1 1 ri ~ ~ ~ ,1', . - , ~ ; , ~ , ~ , °,,;~~ ~ o~ i ~ ~ \n.. y tom""` .u' ~;~~~ - \`~\ ~~~ ~• u,- y6 r I~ r _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ mA y*r~~~~ I~1~ ~ I ~ ~I 1 y' - I^'y t/ ~~~ I I 1 ~ 1 _ ~ 1 ~~~ ~ ~ p ~ St kr fV e ~ ~ \ ~ ~ 1; ~, ~i y ' „~ ,~ ~ ~~.~~ j ; ~ti ' i, -- - ~ yl ~~ ~~~ ~ r i tr...., 1 ~ \ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ a ~ pl~ _ t-~ .. `~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ i~ 1',~, awl ~, \ 'i , ~ a~, i ~ ~ ~~ ~_~, /~l/_ ~ f'~~e,~~q.~ 1 ~r 1/ 1~ X11 i \ ~ / l I `Il ?~ 1, ~ ~~,~ 11 nF 1, III `'^\\\ U'~y~ I` ~'17`~ ~~v ~t`Yl li~ , ~. .~~r ~-`~''~~ I ., ', ~ ~ ~`~ _; , r i ~ ,,fir ~ ~~ ; ; .~~ ~ , i j~ ~ ,~I ( i C. . r --' _ ~ ~~IL)i ~~' ~~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ I EXHIBIT A ~\ q _,.-, 1 ` _~ I ~ l ~+^i \ ~~c\ j ~ ~ ±\. ~r Z gg ~I~ ~ ~1 ~ a E ~ U z~u . ~ 7 O ~ s U l=Nz /+~ =s~~ r i U~em i ¢ ~ p m o z b b ~' ~F o N _~ ~ ~ r \'~ y ~ ~ ~ b. ~ r}. p-~ ..~ ' ~ _ . - ,>~ ~ --- .,~ r ~ o~ c , , r 7 e 'I o ~ """SSS i I 1 a V\ ~ ~1I I, ,G) ~1 ~ a ~' ~ s ~i I ~ J ~~~ -- ~; ~~ „ // Q~GG(I i rl I ~ 1 ~ t ~~ s' f ~ I 1 - ~ r~- ~ e _ - r _ / r V /~ S ~ /~~ ~ ` 6 ~ ,' fl / { ~ ~ 1, ~ ~ ; n ~ro~ rro ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / I ~ 1~ r~l • 1 ~ - ~ ~.,r j ~ ~ - ~ ~ e ~ 9} t `d.., ~ ~ ~~ / r ~- - ~- - ~ ~'s'= \ -- li = ,1 ~ p 1 ` : ~ ~ , . 2 'r~. ~ ~' 1'l~ ~ r i ~ ~ 1 ;Y ~ _ - h ~~/ LJ P Y. r ~ J-•=L V {, i Imo! / /... I ~ ~ u4~ \~ .1 _ ~ r~ .r9n. C \ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'll ~• 1 n ~ ~ L ~ T- ! -~ . a r ~~ _ - ~ - 0 ~ n t~~~! f 1 yy3 ~~~1 tl I,~ e~i .$~~~ ~~~~~ ~ • • • Y4RIL=W IpW YV1'011>PiRUbopl I I 1 1111111 anmpl •wo :::o .~.. i>« i 11 i 111111 92If1,L~9,LIH~BV i DDDDDDDDDD ~ § ~['~ ~ ~j p pb 9 UvVDia IWN Vd (CCIa tlJ ow%vYv 1~u15Vbl V(~ ° 9 ovzoo-9ooz ~aa ~b>o,•~ ~ 111p yan4~ 7su4~ ul }~ 3 a e o ° f uaiylaig punag P~IoS ~ ~ 4 ! ~ ! ¢ s hl ~I QI IAI OI 3~tl tl50WN3H e `~ e~ Y~ a a `' o g~~ r :._ sPG ~t gg q~ h ~ ~ av cpy ~{ d a f~3 t~y 4 ~ C C ~ RS f Ri( gq 31 xS5 " e Ye ~Fg3gs #Fg~F S„~~ $~Q ~~~e~ ( I ~1 o ~ 0 o a IEXHIBII'~ S -~Y > ~ 9s = ~: `; - .I _~2 I _~~ ~ 3~ 3 s u 7 ~ d, ~ ~~ ~ o~ yyg p~ q~ ~~ ~ ~ 3n 3 a ~y6 t9a ~ ff ~~~ €~~ ~~ x ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ tl~~ v ~ OO ~, i~ iiiiilui `ia3~ L « C z e I ~! G i~ G U ~ a a ~ N ,~ g~Y~g $ ~@ e e p y ~ § ~ i q~8~g~® ; $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~`~~~~~~ § ~ gg ,,, ~~= 'q ' ~ ~a~t I~ r"'~ 4 tV I E p a i ' ~~ J ~~ ~-- ! L ~i °:° ~1~4Sa~~x~~~~ " ---a ~; ~ a N ~O VJI MI QI tt)I OI xmrw ~,vuooi Pry wei sm a eoocWe 1E061 ud [C[le vJ owo~ ouv 111 1 I 1 Pr./S .W .rt+D .wn reb ~ _ ~ _ f~• - _•- IeagSYb1 VLW 07200'9007. Jbd ~aro~taus o ~ C 1 11 1 iii 1 1 1 1111 3HI1,L~3,LIH~Btl ' Gr ;~~ j y~in4~ Isuy~ w uai ai uno~ Pi oS ~ a~ { a l a ~ .8 d ! DDDDDDDDDD ~ § ~[ ~ ~ ]~[ II ,p, ~ g p g yy I 4 9 un ~i of u>i oi_ - _ - _ _ - N _ -~_ 0 _ _ • 3ntl tl5 WH3 e~ a~ ~ o e ~~~ .. ~ ~ :a43 ~~ Q N .~~/ I s a N Q S ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~p$ ~~~ ~ ~€ l ~ 7 ~~ ~ 4 3, ~ ~ ~- ;x ~ ~~~ ~ I, ~ p t ° €~ ~/ - E~~I~IT' ~e' I ~' ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ H a ~ ~ ~~~ ~°~~~~~~ a c~-n m Q .7 u71 D- V Ni s~~ - ~ ~ _~ o C i ~ ^ ~~ L «t 0 z ~ e 1 aa 4E ~ B ~ c U ~~ M~ Q~ ~~ N y~ e p ~~ p§§6y @9e~t I i ~ • I/ ~~ ~ r A -'; ~ IE ~ e I = ~ ~~!,i ~~ ~ NI , ~ ~i ti I ~ K ` ~ ~I€ ~ Y~~ ,i 4 „a Sep n --a - i ~; e ~ Q N • o~ • 61 51 ql 31 SI • 4 1 < <~ FRONT ELEVATON REAR ELEVATION PLAN VIEW ,„„ ROOF PLAN o1O®""1~ ""P° bra "iis.puuo~h°rr w> a~ man 4 ~ ~'M~d~~~~4° ~~ ppyy.. S _ ~itfmnz~ 1°Iw ~0^n`tlV'lgsdMMU i '.a°e.e~m~++rw'~ws~armK~m~w~^r~~w w:m~a H w~a.rtiwrrMa~.wW.° ..qy~F. ra. I. „. sECTroN, _ , °°',_ '. yrAU ~ETaL_ • 1 a~;a, ~ .....,,. 3 b nT~rash Enclosure Plan w.., a ~E~closure Elevation a 3 Standard Parking Sfriping~w °,..T ._ __ ____. E`--_--. ~? '..'-° ! 9 r _ J a 5 ~ ~ f € ,.~:~ I a 3 I I SA' ib t 6YE! P ~ ~.. (1H'Cap Parkmg Stnping q I.i',.a. ,..~, w 5 ~~rlo nT~vplcal Landscape Finger ,~.,, a ~ ~ 6I 5I al 31 51 21 41 51 61 fVSA •B[1V~G5 BI SGI DIST °'°'° Ceu..eT.'~4~..e.e~. w~~: o I ~~ +~__ r ~Lighf Pole Concrete Footing ~ w 51 31 41 51 61 • i 0 ~_ p_iJ_. ~JJ-- /J_- /J-- ~J-/_ - 0 /_/_- -%- -~-- --~-- 0 /-/-- ~~7[q~x 5 ~ F ~.S aCJ 8Be 4 ~~ ~~e x E B~V `d ~Z E=d C=am 3 5 ~ '. ''a~}I'iliiil:~~li "I~I' ~' i cuSiti:~lii91u.4 5 0 3 V N m O L `O m L O 4 m V N U j U O R `~- ~= ~`u oV~~€ 'n SiRa ~A030 0 ~~ 21 • 51 31 ozaL iSe leve)vVf oue ¢v (erN 6000-0B6 (e W1 4d ICC 16 YJ owol o(ly 8 rode vo ulla oueeo~ _~ may; ieaus vwl otm o f I I I Wt a1M %1 e14W Vro5 G2[L ~_ ~ yZ00-900Z X214 ~pp0]Ol Bl$ ~ ' '~ ~ I I I III i1 11 gIIR,L~~,LIH~Bd ' °~' y~my~ ~suy~ w d o m o Q ~~ °' uaiy}aig punag pgog ~ g g ~ I DDDDDDDDDD ~ ~ ~[ `][ °~ IViI Il ,V, - ~ 10 CI MI NI MI QI OI A - • ~~. ~_ ~ ~ N i ~~~5~~„~t~ ~~~~a 3 ~~ ~~~ C (~ y~J6 e ~ s ~ i~ i ~ SOtiLP"s~ 4~8E"~ ~ va[ Y ; - I l i II A m o= g ~~~6 r o o. v 'e v7 N M C T n N M O 10 QI MI p-lo NI MI RI OI O oLaL me aem rve of ie iro arm csvice ro nne ou~eol I I I I I I I I I ~ •+n a .nroe wws 066 1 i i i 11111 ~IIR,L~~J.IH~>id DDDDDDDDD ~ ~ ~[ `j[ ~[ ~ II 1G _lo OI MI 1 ~~ Q • CV M 10 _ ~ C 0 `o N W Z C O 6 GI W w 7 O H -- -a=~ aovo-086(606) Vd (CC Ia V~ ~oigro 4 3 O ~°~ y~my~ 1S!i4~ ~! a ° OY ¢ R xw-- ='? ~~-. $ uaiy~aig punoig P9oS rs a k $ 1 NI ~I QI OI N C O 0 d W ~ ~g~ _ ~ ~- a ~ a. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~r ~~~~ ~~~ ~~sa~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ oo®ooao 0 0 0 ® ~~ ~ 'S QQ3$3 m 48R Q y ~ r-~ Z ~ f~ C~~.G C,~~.p :d pp~ ~3~~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ~, v W N a W N Ti I O ~ o ~ n~ \- 8 ~ ~ n~ N _ _ m I W _ C i H a~ ~ ~ O 3 a. ss s~ :a~£ u i ~ ~ N 61 s' NI e71 Q~ N M R N Q C 0 U d N OI QI MI OiY[ I[G 10,G) n1 QItB 1[[ I[,61 [5916 YJ ~IIIH vun6vl i@ vMK U vxRtl VvY+t Y(i[i 11 i 1 i i ggR,L~~.LIH~BV J DDDDDDDDD ~ ~ ~L['~ ~[ ~ II 1G Jn vl MI ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~' 1 ' ° ~ ~~~s ~ ~ ^ e e ~ ~ ~~~ ^ 9F + ^ z N N iM 8 10 'a ~ _ " 6n> 08616061 4d LCL L6 VJ ewal eery p _ »rv;~s D~~i0~~9~~~i ~ad uone~al anS " ~ €~ ~o~ax~" y~iny~ }suy~ w ~ ., = P Q ~~~ ~ uaiy e~g puna ~ o ~ 6 ~ E ~ 9 P I S cv~ [nl c, n. ^ ^ ^ o O o T li O ~a~ ~ "~L ~ $ a ~ I ' ' ~ ry ~ o 3a ~ 3_ ~ s 3~~~~s o Q~ C ,~1~ N ~ s4 ~ ~ ~ ~ s ^ ~ - o L ~ s ( 1 ~~ ~ ~S~ a LL O $~ I o I o I ~ - ~~ d ~ o ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 m QI Mt ^ ^ ~ N Q OI QI OI M1'vi lSe lae)%Yf olly lcv boel c sore v> elan ounao~ py ~ry5 p elwE Vro5 p(ZCZ 1111111 i 1 ~gny~gyIH~NV DDDDDDDDD ~ ~ ~ "][ ~[ ~ II ep, • -lo vi MI -lo _. QI MI A --~ „^e ;r• 6CVV-OB6 (606) Vd LCL l6 tlJ owol oeltl Q x ~'?~~ Ob~i0O'9~OZi ~Z!Q uo~ II eS o m o N ifi6 ~~~~ yan4~ }s!~y~ w d s Q ==.a'- ~`~~ ~ ua~y~a~g punag P!IoS ~ a I ~ ! ! NI ell QI OI_ C N ~ a a ,~ a~ 0 ve.. O Q _ LL ~-a ~c_ OD N " a Mi QI ol- _10 •I a Z O m Q O 7 w N • W • 9 R N O C S m A Q O IN I IW I~ OI_ 4 O O O O O O 3 rs ~ ~g O `~~ §a ~~ N © a © o o a oo®oo ~p a-~ AS .~ P7~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ pF ~~ ~ ~ ~ a 8 S ~a ± ~. ~~~ ~~ _ a m fl N_ m N Q O 7 A _ ~ C ~, a T N m N ~_ O 7 N 10 IA IW IN ~ ~ I s Solid Ground Brethren ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' b D C o in Christ Church ~''~'~-. ~ N ~ b _ - ~ o ¢ Ste locCbn DRC2006-00240 ~'°"` ieW ~,,,,,,~5, ._ H Apa LOma CA 91737 PI1 (9W)9BPddd9 -..,s fD N_ m ID fl O 7 W w N W A IW IA OI TB1~lElL]E~~ ~aaaaa`a~~ ARCHITECTURE i L iii L i d iQOUSwm„wwa a vii ome I I I I I I I I lWV~ 0.11 d 110 fq% rylif v51 ]Bm IA IW aLaL ise boW ne of le ¢o ~e>sf eSeie MJ ~IIIH oun6o~ III I I I I I I °0L °'"'~ '° 41vee wlws vacz 11111 i 111 ggII ~~.LIH~NV DDDDDDDDD ~ ~ ~['~ ~[ ~j II ~ to QI M~ • ,-^ ^ ^ ^ MI ~I 4 • 4 N Qi N • IO ~~~ o ^ 3RW~s ^ ~ ~ 2 ~~ 2 ^ ~~ --- ,s ^ (b ~~ ~~ ~pp ~~ I 4 r 3s~! ~ ' :! ~ k }~ ~ I m I ~~& ~ i u_: A ~~~ o 38c°"_-r ^- - ~~ - ~ ~ boVV p H b (600 Lf(lC VD o~++~l ollV 7 W e ~TM~'~ 'J ( ~ ' ) ^ o~Voo-)o04 Jaa VO511~ 10,g~ a ~ a o 4 g ^ a SAA( c r=.~. y^in4~ ~suy~ w =~=' ~ ua~y}a~g punag pi~og ~ s ~ 1 ! ~ NI tql Q~ O_ ^ ^ ^ n- !o_ _I ~ _e 9~`I I ~ ~ ; ~ ..... °' ~ ~ . ; ~ ' . ~ J ~ . ~_ ~~ - $ 3_$~~s 3>~~~°s s c ~e - y C aI ~~ ' ~ s : F L a N ~ s ~ 5$~as ~s __° --- ~ ~ v I.L 0 ~~ ~s bbb ~u' li ' I ~ C -i -- ------- - -- I ~~ ~~ - 1 7 I ~ / ~I~ I ~ _~ , ~~~'~ ~ ~i~lll g ~I i' it I ytY I' 1 YE~ ~ egI 1 .-.r__ r~ aY / %~__` 1~~' !L.- 4J7 (LJ1 I 3~~ 1 1 ] 1 ] I 1 +S+Y NR ~! } 1 -_ __ - QI MI ~I/ NI ~I~I ]3Y ee I II III ~~ I~ ~ ~,~ i~I ~ll'I'I II I n ~a~ I V ~1 ywT ~y~liii Bea ~~ ~c~ i Y~~~ F_ P ~F ~~Gy 3&~C ell QI N V h OI V I I 029L 15E levE) XVf OI IY ICi bod CSGLG tlJ ~IIIH oun0ol I I I I I I I I °4L °""' ° °1°Oe ~°vv v~La 1 1111 i i l i ~HR,L~~.LIH~BV 4 DDDDDDDDD ~ ~ ~[ `][ ~[ ~ d ,p, _lo m a71 C N ~~ L "' a ` O ~O _ ~ ~'a ~~ CD N • 10 RI vql ~~~`~ NI ~I ~I OI ~-t„ems? 6v>o 0B6 (E061 Vd CCLIb VD owo~ollV 9 ~~ _i „`~~~ «> ((11 ^^vy 15 Vbl oLLa ~Y Z~~~l00Z JUQ uaUOJOl x115 o + ~ A E{E ~~ yany~ }suy~ w a a ~ $ ¢ § ="~* ~ ~ uaiyya~g puna9 p~loS ~ d 4 ~ t ~ NI efl OI OI N • 1 ~ ~ I ~ 1eftse LSe wo ~n H1eoue~eoi PoL eIV5 q qWE WroJ G(L2 1 ~ 111 ~ 111 ~xni~asix~xv DDDDDDDDD ~ ~ ~[ ~[ ~[ ~ II ~L _IO QI MI --•~=$: OVVV 006 (006) Vd [EL16 Vp owol olltl A {^'~ m ^ l54M1 oL00 ~~Z~~')ODZ J~Q 0 0 _ ^ d d@ .,,_q:~"y uOw~Ol ells a " a m ~ $ N F F ~=~~ yamy~ }suy~ ui ¢ R =~-' } uaiy}a~g punag pgog 4 s 9 } ! g NI MI QI OI_ N C O O d W d N 6 L a W QI C ~_ ~ m Q M • N • C O 0 d W YI m 3 Q ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~°Aa~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ oo®oa o 0 0 o a o- ~~ ~a~~ ~i C ,{ y ~ ~~g~gg5g~ °~gg~~t~ ~~ga~~~~ ~~~~~ 33ggd ~ ~~~~~a O ~~94~ ~~5~a~? ~'~3~a.~z y:ZCS -33~ s` ~sr~~i9 _~ o a o o g o o n to VI MI U C O O N W N a W I' 1 NI MI :~ w 1 c OI 0 0 w W L t O Z N M e of i ~i~~~: 661111111111 °' ~ b j DDDDDDDDDD $aN$CU~.~7a~~ io un vi 0 N a M v ~o Y~i I~~ I I1 ~°~' ~~N> ~I hl Ni ~~g »...~o~ W ..,~:: : W , . ....,„ oi o ~ ~ p ~ •, ~ ^anpaig p n rJ P S ~ ~ 9 ~Is ~ _~ Q r W U ' ~ E ', ~ 1~i ~e ~1l-~'j Iii !`1 '~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~s, ~ t W ;;I,,~, ;};; fit 4 I: e r ~ p ~ 91~ ~ a tijitl~j +~'I 'j~ g ~ ~ ~~d ~' ~ff ~ ill~ti~1 i~1il ~~! ~((i~ ~~ ~ ~i~~i64 < l~:fiit~ t~lii i~~ a ~l.JGm°`QY ~ ~ J ~e • ~ nn ~u~ pip o'qS! t°9 p p p ~ ~ '=' • l l l 11 1 1 111 11~~1 I DDDDDDDDDD . ~~ w; .,.,e ;~ ~•{•w. ow~ms~u.c®I I S~ 3 ~3 ~~j y _ I p4y ~ q„ ~u, ~I a3 10 NI pl t01 NI NI T ~~~ ~ ~ ~ p` ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~~ ~~~ ro p~ ~ z k ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ p J ~~~``p'"~~~ ~ >I n. ~ ~i~5~ lam' . • fV N M p h 0 r ~J ~$~i~~[ ~~~~~~, ~F~~i;~~ ~Znf4~~~ °~~~i~~[ ~~a~~3f~ 1, L~ ~Q lp~~ V ~J ~p 0 W J~ \.~ -10 NI pl Mi ~~~ NI NI MI pl NI ' ...a.l.~..,u~^:.: a QiZQO-SOOt 73Q ~ j uazc~~a~8 P no rJ PTl S ~ ~~ 4~ ~~ III NI ~I pl bl afi~ ~~~ 5 'E ¢ e @ y E . $~4~~ ~g~~ ~~ij ~`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <$ItB i~; [~~ p~ .~ fi11111111111°^ ..~ nw 5 DDDDDDDDDD S S ~~j~~ io NI QI n N N M Q a .t~ Ipl F xrrow4W w ~uu w~nm n eim 9, ' g ~±1 I I Z ~ ~ uanilasg punouj PTioS ~ ~ 9 9~ B E MI NI NI NI a71 OI NI ~o~ III g , ~ ~ M v I/~ ~, u I § 3 ~ 4 ° ~ i ! 9~ f~ E s i i @ € s g ° ! 5 i ~~ 1~ i E 3! s 1 I~ I~~~ P E I S I !~ ~~ C~~. ~~i • _ .6 ~ ~e d Fgf !°Y '~~ l~ I~nI ~J ~ B ~ ~ p~ U~ v ~ B I • ~~ , I ,I I fDDDDDDDDDD t°Ot~ ~°Y']M~IIIXN~^~®I I ~ I 3xfl.i_7HSIHJNV ~ ~°~ IPF S S H'I'3 Y~l I Z ~ ~ .....1„»V 14,°q..,.. q'"iq~~'~npml9 uanllaag puno~~ PnoS ~ S ~ 9~ g I 8 9~ 1 ! 10 NI RPI afl NI NI NI Nll QI NI ~~ ~~ 760Wb3N o it e w i Q I N - 6 i i ~® ! : i ~: g i' - C~~. ~~~~.~ ~ ~, ~ ~ iF In I i ti~ <° ~ °( I II° I I o w ~ o ® ® ~ O ® .~I _ o ® ® L ~-~(1- " ! '1 ® o ~ ~ 4 e 1 °z ~;~ii~~~ o ~ ~ ~ i o -,,,c-i1 ~ i I -I' ® J N w I. D a.1 ,~ ~ e i E~; m ~P~ ~ Ewe ~. °~~ ~5f FiY ~~ uu~ QQ~ ~tiI ~u'~^'~~ VL ,- City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Pro)ect Fde. Design Review DRC2006-00240 2. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit 96-17 3. Description of Protect: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH - A request to amend Conditional Use Permit 96-17 and approve a master plan to allow site and building improvements including the construction of additional classrooms and a multi-purpose bulding for use as a gym, on 10 22 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 9974 19th Street - APN'S 1076.051-05, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 1076-061-10, 11, and 12 Solid Ground Brethren in Christ Church (formerly known as Alta Loma Brethren In Christ Church) is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a new master plan to improve the existing church campus for use by its congregants and private school ministry over the next 20.25 years Moreover, the proposed addition of classroom bwldings anticipates a desired expansion of the current private school use (Preschool to 8th Grade) to eventually include grades 9 through 12 (High School) A modification to the Conditional Use Permit will be required when the church is ready to implement the high school portion to the private school In regard to the use of the historic Goerlitz House (formerly known as the EI Rancho Grande Wedding Chapel), the church is currently underway and will be reused primarily as a Spiritual Retreat Center, including religious seminars • and workshops, small social events/receptions, weddings, and tours Although City approval of the master plan will only be good for 5-years, the ultimate timing for the improvements will be dependent on the ability to raise funds for each phase of the master plan The proposed master plans enws~ons the construction of five (5) new buldings ranging in size from 6,000 to 32,000 square feet in size, 3 bulding additions to existing buildings, removal of existing modular units, and more on-site parking The following table provides a breakdown of the elements envisioned by the master plan and the anticipated timeframe for their completion in the future Buildin "~ . ~~ „.~xDescri 'tion" ~~'~'fm~~,~-+~°~~ -. "S` uaFe'Feet-Added,~r Tarr et'Dete*, A Second Floor Interior Remodel - 2025 Second Floor Addition to Existin Buldin 1,600 s uare feet 2030 B Second Floor Addition to Existin Buildin 3,116 s uare feet 2030 C Sanctua Buldin Existin - Com leted D New Classroom Buildin -two-stor 15,396 s uare feet 2014 E New Classroom Bwlding -two-story (Replace 2 Ewshng modular unit 960 s uare feet 5,040 square feet 2014 Phase I -Classrooms 4,300 s uare feet 2006-7 F Phase II -Classrooms/Computer Lab (Replace 3 Ewshng Modular Units (~ 4,320 s uare feet 9,507 square feet 2008 Phase III -Multi ur ose Room/G m 18,398 s uare feet 2011 G Renovation of Goerlitz House (underway) - 2006 Goerlitz House Addition 2,648 s uare feet 2020 H New Educational Buildin 10,000 s uare feet 2030 J New Educational Buildin 17,500 s uare feet 2025 Total ' - _ 87,505 s uare feet 'Contingent upon funds being raised for the Individual rolects EXIT I ~ IT E D--~a • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 Currently, the church provides 167 on-site parking spaces and expects to add 28 more spaces over the life of the master plan More specifically, the applicant proposes to add 21 spaces in 2006-07 in association, Building F- Phase I and 7 with Building F -Phase II When Bwlding F is completed, 195 spaces will be on-site Parking for the entire campus will be based on the regwrements for the multipurpose room/gym in Bwiding F that regwres 189 spaces 4 Protect Sponsor's Name and Address• Gary Ramseyer Solid Ground Brethren in Christ Church (Formerly known as Alta Loma Brethren In Christ Church) 9974 19th Street Alta Loma, CA 91737 5 General Plan Designation: Medium Residential 6. Zoning: Medwm Residential (M) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site and existing church is located on the north side of 19th Street approximately half way between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues The church is surrounded by apartments to the west and east, single-family development on the south side of 19th Street, and the 210 Freeway on the north (see attached USGS Quad Sheet and aerial photo) The zoning designations for the properties surrounding the site are Medium and Medium High Residential (M and MH) for properties located on the north side of 19th Street and Low Residential (L) for properties located on the south side of 19th Street • 8. Lead Agency Name and Address. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Michael Diaz, Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley W ater District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM10 -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Mode17G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED • The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages p a3 Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 r" City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 (/) Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources ()Air Quality ()Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic Utilities & Service S stems Mandator Findin s of Si nificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By Reviewed By Date ` ~ ~~~ ~ Date ~ /" • • • I r • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 • • Less Than Sipni4cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PplanLally wnn Tnan pp g Sipnif¢ant Miupauon Sipnihcant No Impact Incomoratetl Im att Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Have a substantial affect on a scenic vista b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () (/) ( ) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the areas Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The protect site is 10 22 acres in overall size and located on the north side of 19th Street between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues The site is not fully developed but contains improvements that include worship building, accessory buildings, play fields, on-site parking Qointly used by the congregation and the Alta Loma Christian School) The design of the main sanctuary building and accessary buildings are contemporary in design, featuring large roof forms, stucco wall planes, dark brown trim work, and natural river rock retaining walls The new buildings will be designed to complement, but not identically match, the appearance of the existing buildings on the site The tallest of the proposed buildings will be the two-story multipurpose building (Building F) with an overall height of 33 feet As standard procedure, the protect will be subtect to public notice and the City's design review and approval process where the issue of size and design will be will be addressed Protect plans (including landscape plans) will be modified as directed by the Design Review Committee and/or the Planning Commission before approval will be granted As such, no specific mitigation for this issue is required d) The protect will most likely involve the addition of new and relocation of some existing light fixtures located on the site The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on the Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses p a~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than SpNhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potemially Sgnl6cam wnn h4opaaon Tnan Sipni6cent No Im ad Inco oratetl Impam I act b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses • Comments. a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is already developed with church facilities and is surrounded by existing single-family homes There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of fanmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the • General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located in a fully developed area of the City and the nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles east from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR DUALITY Would the project () () () (/) a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any O O O (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people • p -ate • ;" Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 r'~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Then 9gnl6cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Fnanually wnh Tnan pp g Si0nl1¢ent Mnipatlon Siprul¢ant No Itryan Inco retatl Impan I an Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan PEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that IOw-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. ~J~~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Then 9pnilmant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources I=ptenoenr $Ipniho•nt w,tn MM1ipeUOn Tnen SignlUCeni No Impact InCOmoreted Impact IR'Oazt • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result o1 hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,p) emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWoCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~p emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates In Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxide (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~p) would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council \J • In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 56-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation • measures shall be implemented p ~.0 Initial Study for D RC2006-00240 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Legs Then $IBnIIICant Le99 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Wllh man Sipnlhcant Mlnpatipn SiBnll¢ant No Irtnact InromoteteE Impact I ad 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide Increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, • retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The prolect site is located adtacent to sensitive receptors single-family residences and is within 1/4 mile of Alta Loma Junior High School Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated • 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/act () () () (/) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species Identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wddhfe Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service p ~~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Then Sipniimant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potaneally Sipnniwnf with fdhipeoon Than sivmrwm No 1 as Into oretetl Impact Im act c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting O (/) O ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The project site is located in an area already developed with single-family, multiple family, educational uses, and the 210 Freeway that has disrupted the original lay of the land during the construction of these surrounding improvements According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 53 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) City Ordinance No 276 pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of 15 feet in height and having a single trunk circumference of 15 inches or more and multi-trunks having a circumference of 30 inches or more without obtaining a Tree Removal Permit The matority of trees will not be affected by the proposed improvements An area where trees may likely require removal is in the vicinity of the proposed expansion of the Goerlitz House that is tentatively scheduled to occur in or around the year 2020 To assess whether a Tree Removal Permit is necessary, the following mitigation measure is included C~ • 1) Prior to issuance of Building and Grading Permits, provide a tree survey/report of trees within the entire project area. The survey shall provide a Site Plan • designating all trees in the project area that will be removed, relocated, and/or retained/protected during construction. If there are heritage trees within the protect area which meet the specifications as contained in the Rancho D-~ u Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Then Sprnimant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Po,anvelly wnn Tnan pp g Sgnifcanf Mlipavon Sigmvcant No Impact IncOlppnrtetl Impact Impatt Cucamonga Tree Ordinance, then a Tree Removal Permit shall be required and the removed trees shall be replaced on a 1 to 1 basis within the prolect area boundaries f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur • 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect () () () (~) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () (/) ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () (/) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) Located on the prolect site is the Goerlitz House, a "Historic Resource" as defined per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) The building was built in 1926 (added to in 1937) and is associated with the Goerlitz family, well known in early Alta Loma history The home is a good example of local stone construction and is a unique combination of the Mission and Craftsman styles popular in Southern California The home was used as a wedding chapel for many years and came into possession of the church following the construction of the 210 Freeway The church is currently involved in the renovation of the facility pursuant to the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Historic Structures When completed, the church intends to use the bulding as a retreat center for seminars/workshops and occasional small scale recepticns and weddings associated with the mission of the church No mitigation measures regwred b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. n~~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Then SipnHmant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources se~le=a i Mlt gauon sign scam Nc I am Inco ormetl Im an Irrpaq • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with ongmal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the project site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation m the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e, San Bernardino County Museum). • U • p-~- Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Then Si9nd¢em Lau Issues and Sup ortin Information Sources Po.ennanr wun Tnen p g Si9ntlicen+ Miogeaon Si9nJment No I ect Inco oretatl I act I d • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of the existing church facilities and on-site parking No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Secticn 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is regwred for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are antiapated • 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving Q Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O (/) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) Ifquefaction~ iv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Bwlding Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater dfsposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not within a designated Earthquake Fault Zone, • nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The protected location of the Red Hill Fault passes approximately 1/2 mile south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2 miles to the north These faults are both capable of p~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 L¢ss Than Sipnlhcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pot¢nvally Sigmhcant wnn Miapatwn Tnan SipnRCenl No Im ett Inco oratetl Imoact I ect producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is approximately 12 miles northeasterly of the eastern city limits and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M„ 6 2 earthquakes is approximately 15 miles northeasterly from the eastern City limits Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to current Unrform Bwlding Code regwrements will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signficant b) The proposed protect will regwre the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water duality Control Board (RWQCB) daily to reduce (PM~p) emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,q emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~p emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the agwfer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing agwfer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil type onsite consists of Hanford Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive On-site soils types appear to be a combination of Green field and Hanford Sandy Loam soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically considered to be moderately permeable and generally well drained No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • • • ~~ l Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 u • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pman"ally w"" rnan pp g Sipnd¢ant Mlfigauon Sipnd¢ent No I an Incomorateo I en Irtpan 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, would O O O (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving wildland fees, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected • b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Q-3~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Tnan SigniLCant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Potamially SipnJ¢ant w¢n Mitigation man Sipnd¢ant No Impact Incomoraietl I aci Impact Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) The church operates a private school on-site and is approximately 1/2 mile northwest of Deer Canyon Elementary school and Hermosa Park The proposed uses will not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticpated d) The proposed site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 4.1/2 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated The nearest prwate airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2-1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • g) The City's MultrHazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a • disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wlldland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the protect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge regwrements~ () (/) () ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or oft-site • p ~~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Sipnl6cent Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Potenllally With Than PP g SignN¢ant Maipalion Sipmi¢ant No I act Inco ore[ed Im act ImAdCI d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially Increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result In flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quallty~ () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death Involving flooding, Including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (/) Comments. a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The protect Is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES Permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the general permit The general permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and Implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs ~~~ i.- I Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 Less Then Slpnlimant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially S,vntl¢ent With Mlupeoon Then Slpntlicent No I act Into orated 1 eCt Imoecl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Waste discharges Include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES Permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the protect will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff Runoff from driveways, roads, and other Impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs Include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oIl/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activdies 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used • on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • p~0 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Then 9gnl6canl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Potentially with Than pp g Sigmhcant Mmpauon Significant No Irroatt Inco orated Imgatt Impaz'1 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. b) According to CVW D, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect well not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated • e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water duality Management Pian (WIMP), including a D~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than SipNfcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fptanhanr Sipm4cant wnh Miopeoon than SipNfcant No Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 6) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows Thls existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City. and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments. a) The protect site is 10 22 acres in overall size and located on 19th Street between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues The site is of sufficient size to more than adequately accommodate • u • D-~~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than SiBnifcant Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources PP g Potentially Sipnlficanl Wnh MrtiBavon Then &pWment No I ct InwmarateC 1 ect Impatl the proposed improvements to the existing church and expanded private school facilities without mator difficulties or over building of the site If the church is successful in implementing all the protects proposed by the master plan Moreover, the protect will not divide an established community as the protect involves improvements to an existing use within the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) Churches and private school uses are allowed In residential areas subtect to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit The zoning for the site Is Medium Residential and is surrounded by multiple and single-family development Solid Ground Brethren In Christ Church (Formerly known as Alta Loma Brethren In Christ Church) was approved at this site In 1979 In 1983, a Conditional Use Permit for the private school was approved (CUP 83-09) for up to 100 pupils In 1985, a 2,800-square foot classroom building was approved The existing sanctuary and parking was approved In 1989 and subsequently constructed (Development Review 88-19) The existing development on the site Is consistent with City requirements, and the proposed improvements will meet current requirements such as setbacks, building height, and provision of on-site parking At 10 22 acres, the proposed improvements can be easily accommodated and enable the church to meet the needs of its congregants and the students of the private school As such, the existing church and proposed improvements will be consistent with the land use policies of the City's General Plan and do not interfere with other policies for environmental protection As such, no adverse impacts related to the proposed improvement to the church facility are anticipated • c) The protect site Is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site Is not located within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project () () () (/) a) Result In the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result In the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a Iocai general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there Is no impact b) The site Is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there Is no Impact • p-~P~ Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Tnan Signlhtant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotemianr Sipnlhcant wnn Mmgaaon Than Spnificent No I ed Inco oratetl I act I act 11. NOISE. Would the project result in O O O (/) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The prolect site is not located within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out Along the north boundary of the site is a 14-foot high (4 3 meters) sound wall constructed by Caltrans to mitigate the noise impacts caused to the subject site by the below grade 210 Freeway Further improvement of the site will neither affect or be affected by the freeway from its current condition b) The uses associated with this type of prolect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed prolect is intended to better accommodate the activities already present on the site and will not significantly increase traffic, hence, an increase in ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project is expected d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday • • J ~~pa • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Then Signilicent Less Issues and Supportin Information Sources Pptenoany w"" Than g Sgntlmam Mitlgaoon Signd¢ant No Impact Inmmoratatl I ect Impact 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified In Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property Ilne The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Officral within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential Impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measure shall then be regwred • 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6B0 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 4-1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2-1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, O O O (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere D-~3 Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than sipnihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g pptenuany sipndicant w~tn Mrttgallon ,nan sipniUCant No Impact Inco oratetl Impact Impact Comments• a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and well not Induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and well not attract new employees to the area No Impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site does not contain any housing units nor well result in the displacement of any person No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the protect result rn substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated with the provision of new or physrcally altered governmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental rmpacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public sernces O O O (/) a) Flre protection b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other publicfacudies~ O O O (/) Comments: a) The site Is located on 19th Street midway between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues and is served by Flre Station 1 that is located approximately 1 mile west from the protect site on Amethyst Avenue The protect will not require the construction of any new faculties or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes well be placed on the protect so no Impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the nature or pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not result in an increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the school districts are not considered sigmficant d) The site Is In a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is Hermosa Park, located approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing park facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to • • • A~ • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Then SiBml¢ent Lew Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PetaneanY wun Then pp g S~gnihcam Ml9petlan SiBn~hcant No I act Inco aretetl Im ad 1 ect construct new park facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new public facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build- out of the City • 14 RECREATION. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or regwre () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments• a) The site is in a developed area of the city, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect site is large enough to provide open play areas for us of the church congregation and the private school In addition, the construction of the multipurpose building will provide an indoor court for indoor recreational use and gym by the church and the private school Although Hermosa Park is located approximately a 1/2 mile away from the subtect site, the church does not plan to utilize the facility as part of its school or ministry Moreover, this protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above U DDS initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Then $ipnifcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PMenllally Sipni4cant With Minpavon Than Sipnil¢ent No Im act Inco areletl Imoe[t Im act 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the pro,rect () () () (/) a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () () (/) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () (/) ( ) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) The protects proposed in the master plan are intended to accommodate the needs of the existing church and its ministries, including the eventual expansion of the private school The church use generates approximately 91 average daily vehicle trips (ADT) when services are held, and the private school use (elementary and middle school) generates approximately 278 ADT when school is session As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design, including 19th Street, a fully developed secondary arterial with capacity to accommodate the traffic generated by the existing uses Moreover, the protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be regwred to provide any street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards in addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated u • b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that the above described uses will generate the following worst case peak hour trips Church use - 7 48 peak hour trips daily, and, Elementary/Middle school use - 57 5 peak hour trips daily In November 2004, San • Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local turisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a p-~~ • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Tnan Sipm(icanf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pnanaany Slpnii¢ant wan Miapaoon Tnan Sipmhcam No Im act Inco orafetl 1 en Im en Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting regwrement This protect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of Building Permit The protect is in an area that is developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be requred to provide missing or deficient street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 4 miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is ~n an area that is entvely developed The protect will be regwred to provide any street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site as required by the Cfty Engineer The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated • The protect Is designed to provide adequate on-site parking in compliance with the applicable requirements as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for church uses (public assembly) and private schools The church parking is based on seating capacity of the main worship (sanctuary) building at 1 space for every four seats, while private schools require 2 spaces per classroom Seating capacity at the church is currently at 540 seats and requires 135 spaces, while there are 13 classrooms in the pnvate school which requres 26 spaces Currently, the site has 167 spaces and exceeds the parking regwrements for each use Moreover, there is no overlap in the church and private school uses Except for maintaining a small administrative office during the week, the church holds its main services in the evenings and weekends when the school is not operating When Building F is completed parking for the site will be based on the size of the multipurpose room (public assembly portion of the bwlding, because it will generate a greater parking regwrement than the main sanctuary As such, the minimum number of on•site parking spaces required will be 189 On-site parking will be increased to a total of 197 spaces when Bwlding F is completed Assuming that both facilities will not be used for public assembly (50 or more persons) at the same time, the proposed 197 on-site spaces will exceed the minimum and be sufficient for the overall use of the site g) The protect design includes, or will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) ~.~n Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Then Spmhcant Lau Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sipnii¢ant With Mitigation Then SlpniOCent No Im en Inror oratetl Im an Im en 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) 8e served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwiding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga D -~~ • • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 r~ LJ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 Less Then SiBnihcent Less Issues and Supportin Information Sources Pmamlany wpm Then g Sipnlhcent Mnipaoon Sipnil¢ant No I ect Inco orated I ect Im en and RP-1 located within the Clty of Ontario, neither of which has reached capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated • 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (/) a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually O O O (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments. a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant is required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-ot-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan will result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding • Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space ~~ 1 Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Less Than Sigmfcent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potam~auy Sipnihcent wan Mnigetlon Than Signdmant No Im ect Into oratetl Inged I act With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed master plan will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction- related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures will further reduce emission levels Additionally, Impacts resulting from air quality will be short-term and cease once construction activities are completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained In this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized In completing this Initial Study and are available for review In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) • • • D • • • Initial Study for DRC2006-00240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Supportin Information Sources amannany wan Tnan g Signihcant M16gafipn Signlhcant No Impart Inror oratatl I ect Impacl APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point wher rly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature ~~- `~ Date ~ /'• O~ __ ~~~ /~/ Pnnt Name and Trtle /4~'•-h ~ ~~ Cam' FR ~~ - ~a S f~ ~- p~~ • r City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Design Review DRC2006-00240 Public Review Period Closes: August 23, 2006 Protect Name: Project Applicant: Solid Ground Brethren In Christ Church Protect Location (also see attached map): Located at 997419th Street-APN'S 1076-051-05, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 1076-061-10, 11, and 12 Project Description: A request to amend Conditional Use Permit 96-17 and approve a master plan to allow site and building improvements including the construction of additional classrooms and a multi-purpose building for use as a gym, on 10 22 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following fmdmg: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. The factual and analytical basis for this fmdmg is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • August 23, 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By p-~a • RESOLUTION NO 06-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00240, A REQUEST TO APPROVE A NEW MASTER PLAN FOR THE PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF VARIOUS CHURCH FACILITIES, INCLUDING CLASSROOM BUILDINGS AND EDUCATION/RETREAT CENTER, AND INCLUDING SPECIFIC DESIGN APPROVAL OF A TWO-STORY MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING, AND APPROVAL TO KEEP THREE TEMPORARY MODULAR CLASSROOMS ON 10 22 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DW ELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 997419TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 1076-051-05, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 AND 1076-061-10, 11, AND 12 A Recitals 1 Solid Ground Brethren in Christ Church filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00240 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of August 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 23, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 9974 19th Street with a street frontage of 322 feet and lot depth of approximately 950 feet and which is presently improved with bwldings, open space, and parking for the existing church and pnvate school uses, and b The property to the north of the subject site is the I-210 freeway, the property to the south across 19th Street consists ofsingle-family residences, the property to the east and west are large apartment complexes, and • c The property is 10 22 acres in size and shaped to accommodate the proposed improvements, including the provision of regwred on-site parking and internal vehicular circulation, and p ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 • Page 2 d Church and private school uses are allowed in residential areas subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit for which the applicant has applied, e The existing and proposed development for the site is consistent with City Development Code requirements, including setbacks, building height, and the provision of on-site parking, and f Current on-site parking is 167 spaces which exceeds the parking requirements for the existing church and/or the private school uses On-site parking will be increased in the near term to 197 spaces upon the completion of Bwlding F which will exceed the 189 spaces regwred for the entire project at bwld out, and g. The project site ~s surrounded by urbanized land uses not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not located within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, further development of the site will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals, and h On June 8, 2006, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting to solicit public comments No members of the public attended 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 • and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located The proposed master plan for development of the site is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the applicable development criteria contained in the Development Code. Church and private school uses are allowed in residential districts subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit b The proposed master plan and uses, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vianity. The area surrounding the church site is developed with urban uses, and the proposed improvements will not divide an established community or pose adverse impacts to the adjacent neighborhoods/improvements Moreover, the project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area, therefore, developmentwill not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals c The proposed master plans and uses comply with applicable provisions of the Development Code The existing development on the site is consistent with City requirements, and the proposed improvements will meet current regwrements such as setbacks, bwlding height, and provision of on-site parking At 10 22 acres, the shape and size of the site is sufficient to more than adequately accommodate the proposed improvements, including effiaent on-site circulation without major difficulties or risk of over bulding of the site Moreover, the existing church is located on and has access to fully developed public streets of the appropriate size and configuration to • accommodate the existing and improved uses p~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH • August 23, 2006 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and ail comments receroed regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds• (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protectwill have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the • Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during the protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. The subtect site is not m a natural state, contains no bodies of water, and is completely surrounded by suburban development including single- and multiple- family residences and the I-210 freeway, which effectively cuts off the site from any undeveloped lands and wildlife that may exist to the north Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's deasion is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 D~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 • Page 4 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planninc Department 1) This approval is for a master plan to develop the subtect church property for use by the existing church and private school and for the Site Plan and exterior design of Bwlding F of said master plan 2) Plans submitted for plan check shall conform to the plans approved by the Design Review Committee on August 1, 2006, and final Planning Commission protect approval on August 23, 2006. 3) Master plan and design review approval for Building F shall be valid for a 5-year time frame terminating on August 23, 2011 Protects identified in the approved master plan that are not under construction within the 5-year time frame shall require the approval of a new Conditional Use Permit and every 5 years thereafter, until the master plan improvements are completed 4) No changes to the approved master plan or approved exterior design for Bulding F, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without • prior City review and approval 5) All existing temporary trailers/modular units used for classroom and administrative activities for the church and/or school shall be removed from the site within 5 years or upon the completion of Building F - Phase II, whichever occurs first 6) The existing private school (preschool to 8th grade) shall continue to comply with all conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit 83-09, including a condition limiting the school population to 200 pupils (Condition 4 of Resolution No 83-112) Expansion of the existing private school to add students and/or include grades 9through 12 (high school), shall not be initiated without City revew and approval, including a modification of the subtect Conditional Use Permit 7) Design approval shall be required for each new bwldingand/or building addition as proposed for development with the approved master plan Future protects included within the framework of the approved master plan shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the architecture of the existing bwldmgs on the site 8) No outdoor amplified sound system shall be installed and/or utilized on the subtect property, except for short term outdoor events conducted with proper City approval and permits • D~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH • August 23, 2006 Page 5 Engineerino Department 1) Development wdl be requved to install all missing public improvements along the full frontage on 19th Street including, but not limited to, ail improvements to be m accordance with the City's "Secondary" Street Design Standards, a) Protect all existing street improvements, curb and gutter, sidewalks, R-26 "NO PARKING" signs, etc or repair/replace as required. b) Provide one (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlight c) Provide two (2) curbside drain outlets to City Standard No 107-B d) Provide street trees as determined by the City Landscape Section at time of plan check Plot intersection line-of-sight for the driveway on the Grading and Landscape Plans. 2) Development will be required to install all missing improvements along Hermosa Avenue frontage and adjacent off-site frontages as required, including, but not limited to, all improvements to be in accordance with the City's "Secondary" Street Design Standards, • a) Provide on-site illumination as necessary to dlummate the drroeway at Hermosa Avenue to a minimum level of 0 8-foot candle power b) Provide Hermosa Avenue entry sign/monument sign. The entry sign/monument sign shall be illuminated c) The existing wall on the south side of Hermosa Avenue entry driveway shall be reconstructed to a maximum height of 3 feet above the adjacent driveway elevation and to within ten (10) feet of the near edge of the public sidewalk for wsibility of pedestrians Plot the intersection line-of-sightforthednvewayon the Grading and Landscape Plans d) Protect the existing public improvements including curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach or replace as required 3) Process a map to combine the separate properties contained within the project boundaries into one parcel If this is not a desirable course of action, then process reciprocal easements for access and for drainage between all the separate properties 4) Protect the Alta Loma drainage facility which crosses through the northeast part of the property Notify and obtain Caltrans' and the Flood Control District's permission before installing any improvements • adjacent or over the RCB 5) A Water Quality Management Plan is required for this project Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County Water Q~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 • Page 6 Quality Management Plan for New Development and Redevelopment protects http /lwww swrcb ca gov/nvgcb8/html/sb_wgmp html This site provides Gwdance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed Adhere to these gwdelines and use the templates provided Also, include the Best Management Practices identified in the plan on the Grading Plans Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction • measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local • ordinances and use sound engineering practices ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH • August 23, 2006 Page 7 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sotl-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources 1) Prior to issuance of building and grading permits, provde a tree survey/report of trees within the project area The survey shall provide a site plan designating all trees in the project area to be removed, relocated, and retained/protected during construction If there are heritage trees within the project area which meet the specifications as contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Tree Ordinance, then a Tree Removal Permit shall be required and the removed trees shall be replaced on a 1 to 1 basis within the project area boundaries Cultural Resources • 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or durng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 • Page 8 or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report • with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (e g plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring ~s appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an • appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) D-~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH • August 23, 2006 Page 9 Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWG!CB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall • be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included m the Grading Plan, and implemented forthe proposed protect that identifies specific measures tocontrol on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel • dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff p-~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH August 23, 2006 Page 10 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits • 7) Prior to issuance of bwiding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W QMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and • Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nose 1) Construction or grading on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m ,including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bwlding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the • Building Offiaal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the ~-~ a- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-82 DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH • August 23, 2006 Page 11 Bwiding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Haui truck deliveries on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m, and 6 30 a m. including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, tf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY • Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES• COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • p -(03 City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2006-00240 -SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 p-l~l Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2006-00240- BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH • Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if techmcai expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation actwities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further montonng will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation actroities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits W° MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File NO.: DRC2006-00240 Applicant: SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH Initial Study Prepared by: MICHAEL DIAZ Date: July 11, 2006 ~. Air (lualdy ~"';~~~~ _ ~a ^ a e~ , ~:~ , :~ ~i ~~`~, ~u~=' „ ~ _ ~ t~ r, _ : , ,, _ , ; ,: _ r All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for Crty ventication Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and tound to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as Cdy Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • 1~t3 • -. .. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C Z4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the Cdy rf sdt is carved over to adfacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction scalable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical sod-stabdrzers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 2 of 8 -. .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z4 regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C!D Review of plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping y. `~~ 'q." Biolo tcal'Resources' ~:' ''i "'t"~''~~ ~ te ~:~'~:~-f~~i ±;'`~.- r ~" ~ ~' ` '`=,v5~'`~r'~,is ,E~~;^s'~~~~~t>~~. R' '~ , , ,~ . ~, r, . 2 , Prior to issuance of Building and Grading Permits, CP/BO C Review of plans A/D 2/3 provide a tree survey/report of trees within the protect area The survey shall provide a Site Pian designating all trees in the protect area to be removed, relocated and retained/protected during constructon If there are heritage trees within the protect area which meet the specifications as contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Tree Ordinance, then a Tree Removal Permit shall be required and the removed trees shall be replaced on a 1 to 1 basis within the protect area boundaries Cultural Resources :: ~-; ~-<`~~- ~ ., ~; Ur%=~?.~.: a'' _ ,~~ a~k,,4', =~."~"~:- `- " " ', ~ ~ - z If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the deveioperwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological saes within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal pornt • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A!D 3/4 archaeolo ical henta e • 3~ • .. -. -. .. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPlBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on signdicant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report '4/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction acdwhes, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submd a report of findings that wdl also prowde specdic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activdies • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing acUvdies elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino Count Museum C 4 of 8 . • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Revew of report D . 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum 'GeologyancJ Soils r' , '"~; - ;L~~ = ~'~'~~~~,<; 4 ~%,>:~s:,<:~~ i~-r;;'~' ~'~r~.~~n'~~ ~~ ~~;s~ ~F yt~;,~~.,;,'~,-~;>`''" `~, _ '~, , =, _ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C Dunng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minlmlze PM,o emisslons constructlon from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and{Water Quahry~i'~~'~~'~~''~~ -~~s ` ~- `~ ~ .,., 5 . ~ °T~ ~` ~'~`~ ~.~ ;~~t:;.~~. , ~ , , r- i Pnor to issuance of grading permds, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actiwties entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 5~ • . . .. . . . ... . .. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediabon or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there ' is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall prepare a Water Quality CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Management Plan (WOMP) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and mrnimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 6of8 ... -. -. .. Pnor to issuance of bwlding permds, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO 8/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permd ='$siL~.~„sc r4.}~a{'* ~"~ .~; 'C.~~"' ~ , "~ ~ ' No ~ ~~++3~`pF~~"7i~yy~ '~ " + ~ 'Y~ z ~` ~ " $ ns k~ ~x~:~e:~f~=,r ,. ~.~11 yti`~(; ~•,`: ,«~~ ~.;,.:;, ., ;- ~ds, ~ M , ise , „x . . ;,'~<, ,,~~~~-~~ ;~a ~. ,~~r. ~ ~:k , ,:{~. - ;.~ _ ~r ~ , , _ , ~ Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a nahonalhohday • 7~ ~ • ... -. . . . . . . . .. . . Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall here a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as speclfled in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Sald consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity tc a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, conslrucllon including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings a W Key to Checklist Abbreviations rResponsiblePerson :_<`~r%~~";K-~'~=`^'~~'•= `Monitd~ing;Frequency'~N~.ifi'~' ~MetFiod'of•Verificatibn E't_~"~a=`~s'-~1~~"~' p• _ ~ "'-~~fr~•~'=~"~k;-"""`~~ -" "=Sanctions ~'~, CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - W dhhold Cemhcate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation i \planning\final\cega\mmchklst-rev1-05final doc 8 of 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00240 SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN FOR SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH APPLICANT: SOLID GROUND BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH LOCATION: 9974 19TH STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-82, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved In the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Ttme Limits Conditional Use Permit and Development/Design Review approval for Building F shall expire If building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include the master site plan, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors for Building F, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and • Development Code SC-1-OS 1 Completion Date J-/_ -/-/. -/_/. -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & 5[t Rpt\DRC2006-00240Std -23 doc p Protect No DRC2006-00240 Completion Data 2 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety • Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 3 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc ), or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 6 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 7 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 9 All building numbers shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper _/~~ illumination 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ owner, or other means acceptable to the City 11 The site contains the Goerlitz House, a designated Historical Landmark Any further _/_/_ modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval D. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stt Rpt\DRC2006-00240StdCpnd 8-2~ Ir\J ~"'7 Protect No DRC2006-00240 Completion Date E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) • 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts ~_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per Ciry standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped F. Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily ~_/_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number •G. La ndscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stal Is 3 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 4 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pricr to occupancy 5 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for h _/_/_ • t e continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00240StdCond 8-23 doc Protect No DRC2006-00240 within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced wlthln 30 days from the date of damage Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Slgn Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required tc post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $495 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) See Attached. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City ComoleNOn Date • -/-/- ~-/ ~-/. _/_/~ -/-/- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Sif Rpt\DRC2006-00240StdCond 8-23 doc D-~~ Protect No DRC2006-D0240 Completion Date L. • Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trell Other 19th Street X X X (e) Hermosa Avenue X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (D) Curbside drain outlet(s) Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required • c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check • Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program -/-/- -/-/- -/~. -/-/. -/-/- _/-/_ _/~- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00240StdCOnd 6~2~oc i Protect No DRC2006-00240 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditicns and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spaeing Size Oty 19th Street Determine at time of plan check Hermosa Avenue Determine at time of plan check Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only M. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer N. Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects Comoletion Date -/-/- • _/-/. u -/-/- -/-/- ~-/- -/-/- -/-/- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00240StdCond 8- doc D 1.~1 Protect No DRC2006-00240 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies Involved • Approval of the final parcel map well be subfect to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within then right of-way Caltrans 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance If no map is Involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable If at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell • All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be In vandal-resistant fixtures R. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used S. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibilRy T Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm Ii needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • SEE ATTACHED 7 Comolehon Dete -/-/- -/~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/_/. -/_/ / / -/-/- ~___/_ -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Sif Rpt\DRC2006-00240StdCond 8~3 doc Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Building & Safety COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS August 7, 2006 Solid Ground Brethren in Christ 9974 19th Banquet faality Restoration & New Multi-Purpose Building DRC2006-00240 The applicant must continue to work with the Building official to resolve all the Safety, Life and structural issues before a final certificate of occupancy is obtained for the first phase of building `G'. The second phase of the building `G' when constructed will regwre that bulding `G' in it entirety be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction 2 The protect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Bwlding Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 & 39 3 Provide compliance with the California Bwiding Code for regwred occupancy separations 4 Provde draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7 Provide the regwred restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29. 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adioining rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc ) 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requrements may be regwred 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled • u Page~of:31 • 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans B. General Requirements 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan b Floor Plan c Foundation Plan d Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning g Planning Department Tracking Number (i e , DRC2006-00240) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans • h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Bwldmg and Safety Department C. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2006-00240) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or maior addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees • Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance Page 2 of 3p-~c'~. 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcei map • recordation and prior to issuance of bwiding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) D. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be m accordance with California Bwlding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be required 5 The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be • completed, submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 6 A separate grading plan check submittal ~s regwred for all new construction projects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477-2710 • Page 3 of 3p-~-3 ~,.a~ •~, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 1 ` Fire Construction Services ___.- STANDARD CONDITIONS August 7, 2006 Solid Ground Brethren in Christ 9974 19th Banquet facility Restoration & New Multi-Purpose Bwlding DRC2006-00240 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-cucamonoa ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply •1 Design gudelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ni On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding c If any portion of a facility or bulding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided • d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof U FSC-2 Fire Flow The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50- percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subfect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits wdl not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans • FSC-4 Reqwrement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in' Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings Existing building 'G' will not be required to be sprinklered until the phase II addition is constructed "AII structures that do not meet Fire District access requrements (see Fire Access) When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bwiding or swte's fire alarm syste Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and speaficatio shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 ~~~~ Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system may be requued to be monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. • f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~. Trees and shrubs planted adfacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- mchesfrom the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways• Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In bwldings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all requred openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings Commercial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply 3 p-~~ a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be submitted to Fi~ Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c. Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override deuce and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption dewces (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be regwr due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 8 Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buldings on to the roofs of all commeraal, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aenal ladder. b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the bwiding size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall f~ identified in accordance to the roof access standard e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is regwred 4~~~ • f Multiple access ladders may be requred for larger bwidings g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the fudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property Battery Systems Candles and open flames in public assemblies Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Any business that operates on rented or leased orooertv which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subfect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant spgg must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by t~ owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous matenals in accordance with the 2001 California Bulding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (privat~ fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on th site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible f~ obtaining the fire flow information from CCW D and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services D-~"~ 6 ~RIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire Ime contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the Califorrna Fire Code. 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4 Fire Sprinkler Momtonng• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler • monitoring system shalt be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services , 6 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted m accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services S. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family bwldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes •10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, D-ao 7 Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Diwsion The applicant must also obt~ inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Yz" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • • p-a~ 8 s~r~~ DATE August 23, 2006 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2006-00683 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to review the site acgwsition of 3 acres of land for a proposed expansion of the Etiwanda Colony Elementary school in the Estate Residential District (1 to 1 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 230 feet north of Banyan Street - APN 0225-122-65 • ABSTRACT• Under State law, the Office of the State Architect has the authority to review and approve school facilities In order "to promote the safety of pupils and comprehensive community planning," the school district is required to solicit a written report from the Planning Commission prior to construction of a school pursuant to Government Code Section 65402 The Planning Commission is requred to make a finding regarding the proposed structures "as to conformity with said adopted General Plan or part thereof " The district cannot acquire property for schools without first having the proposed acquisition submitted to and reported upon by the Planning Commission The Planning Commission is required to investigate the site and detail its recommendations, in writing, to the school district SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North -Vacant, Estate Residential (1 - 1 dwelling units per acre) South -Vacant and Single-Family Residences, Estate Residential (1 - 1 dwelling units per acre) East -Summit Intermediate School, School West - Etiwanda Colony Elementary School, Estate Residential (1 - 1 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Project Site - Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) North -Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South -Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East -Park • West -Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics Predominantly vacant land with mature trees throughout ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00683 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT August 23, 2006 Page 2 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Etiwanda School District is proposing to purchase property to expand their existing Etiwanda Colony Elementary School and provide auxiliary faalities for the district In a telephone interview with Doug Claflm, Assistant Superintendent, it was noted that the district desires an auxiliary site that may include offices, kitchen, and parking, in addition to more classrooms The district offices are currently located on the same grounds as Summit Intermediate School across the street ANALYSIS A Land Use The proposed school site is consistent with the General Plan policy to "organize educational, cultural, and recreational activities in close proximity to one another and conveniently accessible to their potential users " Typically, the City and school districts have worked together to locate schools and parks next to each other This arrangement benefits the City by making school faalities available for City programs through the Community Services Department and benefits the school by providing larger open space and play area for children The proposed school site would expand the adlommg existing elementary school and is located across the street from Etiwanda Creek Park, a public community park B Design Review Committee As a courtesy review, the proposed site acquisition does not require Design Review Committee review C Technical Review Committee As a courtesy review, the proposed site acquisition does • not regwre Technical Review Committee review, however, the site acgwsition was reviewed by the Planning Department The following comments are offered for the Planning Commission's consideration 1. Decorative metal fencing, rather than chain link, should be used to secure the site 2 Elevations should be submitted to the Planning Commission for courtesy review School design should follow the architectural design guidelines of the Etiwanda Specific Plan 3 The school district should coordinate access locations with the City Traffic Engineer 4 Removal of Eucalyptus "Blue Gum" windrows should be replaced with Eucalyptus "Spotted Gum" windrows along the 330-foot by 660-foot grid per the regwrements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan 5 Street frontages should be improved consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan East Avenue is designated as a "Special Boulevard" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The "Special Boulevard" designation regwres a street side setback of 20 percent of depth of lot, need not exceed 45 feet, nor be less than 25 feet as measured from the face of curb 6. All properties are located within a Flood Zone "D," therefore, the protect must prepare a drainage study addressing flood protection as part of the environmental • review process The master planned storm drain in East Avenue, between Banyan Street and Highland Avenue, and a local storm drain in Banyan Street, should be constructed with this protect to properly dispose of runoff ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00683 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT August 23, 2006 . Page 3 7 A Development Review application including, but not limited to, Site Plans, Building Elevations, and Landscape Plans should be submitted to the City for a courtesy review RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the school construction conforms to the General Plan and direct the Planning Drector to forward the Commission's comments in writing to the Etiwanda School District Respectfully submitted, Jam s R Troyer Planning Director JRT DC\ma Attachments Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Letter from Etiwanda School District dated July 26, 2006 • • E-3 ~_ W 0 s v a~ w 0 0 v ~a ca w E-y • C Shawn Judson, Ed D Supennlendenl Douglas M Clagtn Assistant Supenmendent of Business Services Rebecca M Lawrence Assistant Supenntendant of InstructionlPUptl Services ~idt M Soehnel sistam Supenntendentof Personnel wa Kordtch Adminisuabr of Special Programs 6061 East Avenue, Etlwanda, California 91739 www etrwanda k12 ca us (909) 899-2451 FAX (909) 899-9463 July 26, 2006 Board of Trustees Brynna Cadman Cafhime Fort David W Long Mark H Murphy Cecilia L Solono CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 2 7 2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga RECEIVED -PLANNING Planning Division 10500 Clvlc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re Notice of Acquisition of Property by Etlwanda School Dlstrlct ladies and Gentlemen The Etlwanda School Dlstrlct proposes to acquire an additional 3 04 acres of Assessor's Parcel No 0225-122-65-0000 generally located on the northwest corner of Banyan Street and East Avenue in the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The usage of this • land will be educational support facilities for the district Section 65402(c) of the Government Code and Public Resources Code section 21151 2 provide that if a general plan has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired for public purposes until such acquisition has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to the conformity with the adopted general plan The Etlwanda School District hereby submits the request required by section 65402(c) of the California Government Code to the planning agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Very truly yours, ~~ Do glas M Claflin Assistant Superintendent, Business Services DMC/dmc • H PAY ~on,menu\Fncibues ConsimnivN.aub\Cny Renucs\ for Rev,ew dac ~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE August 23, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2006-00685 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to review the proposed construction of an elementary school for approximately 950 students on 10 gross acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) to be located on the north side of Banyan Street, approximately 2,500 feet east of East Avenue - APN 0225-131-11 Related File Preliminary Review DRC2005-00097 • ABSTRACT. The District has changed their plans to increase the student population to 950 (a 58 percent increase) Under State law, the Office of State Architect has the authority to review and approve school facilities In order to "promote the safety of puptls and comprehensive community planning," the school district is required to solicit a written report from the Planning Commission prior to construction of a school pursuant to Government Code Section 65402 The Planning Commission is requred to make a finding regarding the proposed structures "as to conformity with said adopted General Plan or part thereof " The district cannot acquire property for schools without first having the proposed acquisition submitted to and reported upon by the Planning Commission, however, the district acquired this property in 1989 without doing so Subsequently, in 2005, the Planning Commission reviewed the site acgwsition and construction of the proposed elementary school SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant, Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, Open Space West - Vacant, Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) • East - Flood Control West - Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00685 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT August 23, 2006 Page 2 C Site Characteristics The property is an undisturbed Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (APBs) habitat that was burned in the October 2003 fires According to the City's General Plan, "APBs, a distinctive and rare natural community, is found across the alluvial fans at the base of the San Gabriel mountains AFSS is sometimes referred to as Riversidian Sage Scrub, a subset of the more widely known Coastal Sage Scrub The school site is just south of the existing San Sevaine Preserve, an AFSS plant community conservation area, that was established by the County of San Bernardino as mitigation for floodwater diversion structures and debris basins ANALYSIS. A Land Use The Etiwanda School District is proposing to construct an elementary school to house approximately 950 students The General Plan Land Use Plan designates the site as Very Low Residential • The East Banyan School site is consistent with the General Plan policy to "organize educational, cultural, and recreational activities in close proximity to one another and conveniently accessible to their potential users " The school is located within the rapidly growing Etiwanda community During the past several years, the City has annexed hundreds of acres of land to the north that will be developed with single-family residences The General Plan Land Use Pian indicates that the nearest "floating" future elementary school site designation is approximately 2,000 feet north of Wilson Avenue, west of • Wardman Bullock Road; however, the District has not indicated whether the Banyan Street school site would be in addition to the Wardman-Bullock Road site The East Banyan School site adjoins the future expansion of the City's Etiwanda Creek Park (Exhibit C). The approved Master Plan for the park calls for the majority of the park expansion to be a natural open space area with trails The General Plan encourages schools adjoining public parks for potential joint use B. Site Plan The District has provided a Conceptual Site Plan for the construction of the school (Exhibit B). The square site accommodates the modularized approach to site planning and classroom design used throughout the district the non-classroom facilities (offices, media center, and multi-purpose room) are clustered together at the front of the school, with modular classrooms clustered on the west side of the campus The grid of classrooms is slanted diagonally to provide the shortest walking distance to the non-classroom core The playgrounds are located in the northeast corner of the school grounds Four driveways are proposed, two ingress and two egress, including two for the school buses No elevations were provided Although public schools are not subject to the City's zoning regulations or review, we would encourage the district to follow the spirit and intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan C Safe Route to Schools Banyan Street has been partially improved across the property frontage by Pulte Homes to connect to their Tract 14759 under construction to the east (Exhibit C) Until full Banyan Street improvements are completed, the school would be an island surrounded by vacant land without any safe route for children to walk to and from • school The nearest existing sidewalk, along the Banyan Street frontage of PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00685 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT August 23, 2006 • Page 3 Summit Middle School, is approximately 900 feet west of the proposed school Because of the City's goal that there are safe routes to all schools, the City would have to install a missing sidewalk connecting to East Avenue and the Pulte tract The State of California will not fund off-site street improvements Further, the Fire Protection District regwres that a secondary means of access onto the campus site be provided because of the area being prone to flooding and street closures D Engineering The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed school site The Etiwanda School District will be responsible for dedication and improving their frontage, and, depending upon timing of other improvements in the area, will be responsible for off-site or additional street improvements The site is located in an area lacking storm drains and subject to potential flooding because of the breakout of the Etiwanda Regional Spreading Grounds levee to the north The City's adopted Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy regwres the distract to prepare a drainage report and construct local and Master Plan System 6 drainage facilities (a 60-inch pipe in realignment of Banyan Street) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the school construction conforms to the General Plan Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ a~ Jam~o er AICP Y . Planning Director JRT DC\ge Attachments Exhibit A - Letter from the Etiwanda School District Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Location Map CJ I=-3 Shawn Judson, Ed D SupennteMent Douglas M ClaFltn Assistant Supenntendent o(ausmess Services Rebecca M Lawrence Assistant Supenntendent of insiruc6oNPUpd Services Hetdt M Soehnel Assistant Supennlendenl of Personnel Sylvia Kordtch AdmmisVator of Special Programs 6061 East Avenue, Etiwanda, California 9173 www etawanda k12 ca us (909) 899-2451 FAX (909) 899-9463 July 25, 2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Plamm~g 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Board of Trustees Brynna Cadman Cathime Fort David W Long Mark H Mur Cecilia L Solor C1T1' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~lu~ ~ 7 Zoos RECEIl1Ep _ p~ANNING RE Notrce of Intent to Acqurre Property for Public School Use ~ G ZOp~p ^G~~O g To Whom This May Concern In accordance with Calrfomra Publrc Resources Code Sectron 21151 2, school districts are regwred to notify the local planning commission havmglurisdictton that they are intending to acquire property for new school sites The Ettwanda Elementary School Dtstnct previously nottfied you that rt intends to develop the property located at Banyan (former Summrt) Avenue and South of Wilson for the East Banyan Elementazy School on approximately 10 acres The school was onginally planned for 600 students Since the ongmal notice to the Crty, the Dtstnct has changed their plans to house a maximum of 950 students Please be advised of this change and the attached site plan for the project You are requested to respond with your written comments to this nonce m thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter Please feel free to call me at (909) 803-3124, if you have any questions Sincerely, ~~ ~~ Douglas M Claflm Assistant Supenntendent, Business Services enc EXHIBIT A ~-~ • J •ua : :•: :.., " ~./ ~ ~ ' . . . a q uen.o emuuaa uw. n• ^ Nbld 3115 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ r. " L:I ® L:IL J ®~ LJ ® ~W'Sx]axltrya uelxaLnauosutedu tomop looyg apua,xg3 y I ', I i ~ Q ~ `~~ ![ f~ ~g® [ ~ 1 ~l [ ~~(d [ ! I ~ 1 ~ ®~~ ~~ ~ ~ [ ~~ 1 ~ I U if ~j fli l!!! ~ ~ ~ ;(~ y '[ °~a 1i16'~ S{ i~ [ lii y I ~~ [ , ~ [~~ ~~I ~ ~ [ e r w ec ~ 111 ! CC1 ~ I~ I ~ 1 [ j p~~ S` i 5 7 !! f l ! 88if ~ ~xl ; ~ 4 _ _illa ~ ° ~f ! ~ j 11~i°E l~~j1~~! ~~I~~ 1 [t ~ ~I~ii~l~~~~ ~~~j~q~~lltl~~~~ 11 ji(f fl~lii~ l~E~Il~fa~~Il~~!lil~ i ~ l "' Z W 1 ~[~ { !f[ ! r { lair ei { I i { ~a S 1 ! [ E!~[t.[a~t[at ~ ~ O Z ~ ~ {~ ii r^r 3 i {I ~I to x E~ I t { ~! 1 [~ i f • {{ NN ~~ [S~a ~~;p 1~ ! i ~ < w ? •~ f[~ e f~ Ei~r f €~ ~ ~' ~~ ", > E4Q,o~lll3li[~:i :t li!lll~lilr a-41li41l1{ti6~ii9lr~ii4:i~1[~:491,y[l~:I! ~ ~ ~ ~ a fi ~i[i19i6 0 d~~~€~€~ ~ o ( ~~~i ~ ••n...uvus.rrurcrsl nrir tsrn. urrre rxtA UUUrtuHtrttu..rt °: [[ i II i i i o ° III ---~ III I '~`' f ~ ~ _ _ iMLW01~'1 Y.M. ' a 1 A~ o, ~` g [ ~ ~ f ~0 ------ i i ~ i ~ i ~ z 9 I~ ~ ®~ ' I ----- a ® i ~~ ~ f ~~ 6 ~ I : I o , ~® e I @ p+ I 1 I ~ ~ ° , Q ~ I ~ 7 d ~ I ~ ~~® ; g ~ ~ ~ '~ ~.Y-~ , ~,~.v. ~ ~ 2 I 1 1 a . ~~ e ~ ~.. I ql ' __ I ~ ~ I i _5 EXHI ~I~" 6 . ~ •i -~ ~ -~ .__._ ------------ --• I--I----- 1 I ~- ~-- '3 -- ~i ~ , ~~ ' ?- ri ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. '~'~ ~ --~ -~~-%- , ;_ .~ i r ~ ~~' 1 ~, i Q i~` ` i, ~ ; , ~~ ' ~ ~,~ '~. ,t , I ~'. ~,I I EXFiI~IT C ~$~~ ~~~ ~~ ;i ~~~s • R A N C n 0 C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE August 23, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, Planning Director BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT PROGRESS REPORT ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-45 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-03 -MARGARITA BEACH ANALYSIS • This is the second three-month progress report as requred by the modified conditions of approval for Margarita Beach as adopted by the City Council on February 15, 2006 (Resolution No 06-052) The majority of the required changes in operation were completed during the first three-month review In addition to maintaining compliance with the conditions of approval, the applicant has also completed the remaining items, as verified by staff inspection, which are listed below Ongoing Compliance/Update Items • Advertising -Recent fliers (postcards) omit titillating images and text. New printed promotions now emphasize food promotions (Exhibit A) Staff reviewed the www iepartv coin website and found nothing referencing the Rancho Cucamonga location and only one image referencing the San Bernardino business (Exhibit B) • Davs of Operation -Margarita Beach is continuing to operate Wednesday through Sunday for the time being Peak business hours remain late evening until closing at 2 00 a m , Friday through Sunday Beginning August 1, 2006, Margarita Beach will be open on Tuesdays • Exterior Appearance and Neiohborhood Litter -The appearance of the shopping center in which Margarita Beach is located has steadily improved in recent months No significant trash or litter (e g bottles) has been observed near or around the subject use, or in the surrounding neighborhood The logs kept by Margarita Beach indicate that checks of the area are being routinely performed • Security/On-Site Parking Enforcement - No concerns or complaints from local residents have been received by staff ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-45 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-03 August 23, 2006 Page 2 • Complaints and Calls for Service - To date, staff has not received any complaints from the residents or merchants surrounding the Margarita Beach establishment According to the Police records, a total of 12 "calls for service" were received between the dates of May 1 to July 29, 2006, for the Margarita Beach area (Exhibit C) No arrests or serous crimes reported were directly related to Margarita Beach operation Of the reported calls for service, 4 calls appear to be unrelated traffic items on Foothill Boulevard, 2 were pedestrian checks (one arrest for misdemeanor), 1 reported fight at Margarita Beach (participants gone when Police arrived), and 5 calls for a range of reasons including stolen cell phone, false burglar alarm, noise in parking lot, requested escort, and a call for help (no one found upon arrival) Fire Department -The Fire Department conducted a bar check on Saturday morning August 5, 2006, between midnight and 1 00 a m The Fire Inspector determined that the number of patrons was at the allowed capacity (232 persons) by reviewing the counting clickers at the front door and observing the crowd There were minor violations of compressed gas cylinders not being chained up and cardboard boxes/trash blocking the east rear emergency exit Both items were corrected on the spot Public Assembly Night Inspection Report #PA-1101 was issued to them documenting compliance at that time ABC Reoulations - No violations were reported to staff by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Meetinos with Police and Neiohbors - As required by conditions of approval, every 60 days • the business proprietor must meet, or at least offer to meet with the Police and the neighbors In April, the neighbors in the vicinity of the business were sent a letter from Mr Davidson inviting them to meet or contact him regarding the present operation of the business According to Mr Davidson, no one expressed a desire to meet at that time or in the future No comment regarding the offer was received by staff On August 8, 2006, Mr Davidson and Police Captain Ortiz met and discussed issues related to the operation of the business After the initial Neighborhood Watch meeting in 2005, residents in the Estaaa Court area have not requested follow up meetings Finally, a Business Watch meeting was scheduled and held on June 6, 2006, but no one attended the meeting except Mr Davidson Recently Completed Items Kitchen Improvements - As required by a condition of approval for installation within six months, the owner purchased a pizza oven and additional refrigeration All units are plug-ins and require no structural changes or bwlding permits Menu Changes -The proprietor of the business is aware that the service of alcoholic beverages may only occur in conjunction with a full food menu As mentioned previously, last call for food items is 1 00 a m (to allow for preparation and consumption of the food item) with the bar closing at 1 40 a m According to the business owner, new food promotions are as follows - Buy one get second free burger special -good any time • - Free pizza giveaway with birthday speaal vZ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-45 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-03 August 23, 2006 • Page 3 - Sunday Night - $3 00 Steak Night (complete dinner) - Wednesday night is "Cheeseburger Special" with all cheeseburgers lust 99 cents - Thursday Night Taco Bar (complimentary taco bar) from 8 to 10 p m - Starting on August 1, 2006 - "Taco Tuesdays" with free tacos all night Regulatorv Street Signs -The placement of two street regulatory signs indicating "Dead End" or "Not a Through Street" was required for installation at the entrance to Estacia Court and Pasito Avenue During the review by the City Engineer it was determined that one sign already existed in the area Moreover, the proposed placement of the second sign was opposed by the adjacent property owner who believed the sign to be ugly and devalue his property As an alternative, the existing "Not a Through Street" sign located on the corner of Ramona Avenue and Estacia Court was replaced with a larger and more reflective sign The cost of the sign replacement was approximately $75 CONCLUSION Overall, staff finds Margarita Beach to be operating in accordance and up to date with the timeline established by the modified conditions of approval approved by both the Planning Commission and City Council All regwred items for completion within the first six months of operation under the new conditions of approval have been completed RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the Planning Commission receive the progress report, review the information therein, and file for future reference The next progress report will • occur in six months, February 2007 Respectfully submitted, ~.~- R. ~ James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT MD/ma Attachments Exhibit A -Margarita Beach Advertisement Fliers/Postcards Exhibit B - Website Page for www i e party com Exhibit C - Police Department Summary Report for Margarita Beach Area - May through July 2006 Exhibit D -Summary of Margarita Beach Conditions of Approval • G-3 •r p, di~,~ ~ // ~- 41 : - ~ : ~A ~, ,fi'r` x~ • ~~~~'~' ~ « f~~ ,., ' , ~= ,.~° ~~ ti ~,~ ; ~ .~~,~9,8i11~1~ ~n0ll5T~~7111611T ~3 ~~ ~ = Dinner~5rdose ,~ , ~~~°~ U-[p~-1:T . IF YOU VI%ORI~~ ~ - ~RVICE INDUSTRY (BAR, RESTAU~3~ ~. O~E1, ET.C.) YOU WILL RECEIVE {5) $2:00'l~`C-ALL IT DRINKS TICKETS WITH PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT711 ~~~I1~!~~ ~ i ~I~ i ~ ~~9,50~Foothill blvd., R. Cucamongn (909) 945-1644 Ertib; E A All menu items are avaUable during all business ~- S~ ~,~== Dm~ne ~s- ~~~~U-[A t~L-1.T~~ IF YOU WOR,~rI VICE INDUSTRY (BAR, RESTAURAt~;,,,~1~(7TEL, ETC.)'YOU WILL RECEIVE (5) $2.00 U-CALL IT' DRINKS TICKET, WITH•PROOF OF EMPLOYMENTI~I 0 ~ 1 1 1 y996Q,Foothill blvd., R. Cucamonga (909) 945-164 ~-~ rviai~aii~a Dcat,u eau Dciua~uuiu Yage 1 OT 1 J • ~xlUbit 8 ~~ http /heparty com/ 8/7/2006 'Message Ortiz, Pedro From Wolff, Steve Sent Fnday, August 04, 2006 9 27 AM To. Ortiz, Pedro Subject RE Margarita Beach PC Update rage r or ~ Good Morning Capt Here is the info on Marganta Beach from May 1 thru August 4 DATE INCIDENT C ALL TYPE DETAILS 050106 RC061210307 T-STOP NAT . 050906 RC061290011 1126 ~ Flag Down, Vehicle Ran Out of Gas m Roadway Hazard Moved to Safety , - 051106 RC061310009 PEDCK 1 Artest Misd Warrant • 052906 RC061490382 LOSTP Incdent Report for LOSt Cell Phone - 061506 RC061660387 T-STOP CVC Advised - 061806 RC061690043 PEDCK Subject Checks OK - 062406 RC061750025 ARECK (Fight) Reported by Margarta Beach , Employee - A Female PaVOn Just Got Hit in the Head With a Beer Bottle There is Now a Fight in Progress Deputes On Scene Within 5 Minutes But AU Parties GOA • 062506 RC061760002 T-STOP CVC Advised - 070406 RC061850025 UNKPRO Receive Call From Screaming Female on a Cell Phone Saying Send Help - Deputes Amve Within 5 Minutes All Parties GOA - 072306 RC062040036 PUBSER Patron At Location Calls Dispatch Saying He Was Asked To Leave The Locaton By the Bouncers He Says He Feels He Was Discriminated Against and Doesn't Feel Safe Leaving The Location Unless A Deputy Escorts Him Out Of The Nea Call Came In Around 0145 and Was Pre-Empted Once It Looks Like It Was Cancelled Around 0234 Most Likely Because the Bar Would Have Been Closed Cy T hen and the Problem No longer Existed DISPO'D -NAT - 072406 BC062050131 459A Audible Alarrn Cancelled By Alarm Company After Receiving Abort Code , _ 072906 RC062100009 415 Appears to be an On-View Incident -Observing 3 Sublects 415 in the Parking Lot Sublects Were Checked and Advised ' Lel me know rf you need anything else - Steve Wolff Detective Technical Investigative Support - San Bernardino Sheriff's Departmenf - Rancho Cucamonga Station - 10510 Qvic Center Dnve cho ucgmo ga ACA 91730/'~ 7 857 1 / ~ ~_~ • • • L . . ... . .. .. ~. ~„a ',No:` ~,~sy+~r:.; trr, ~i,r c?:'~~,w.... ;~-~ S'k1'SW°4 rt< ?.:_; "-,s^. .A, `~,. •u _~... :. ~ -' ~"~, ~;= •~_Suinmaryof-Condition,,y;-, '°'~~°~3~r~' ' =° ' ' ~ "De`atl line' ' _ - f-at"~'=C'o mplefion}~~ ' 4~+ a~'b ~tx' .x ,;+~,~ ry a r, ar is~ryrk.,., ~ h4 ..i~,T S5 F ''~ r~.Y`l~• ~~ ~'yvm~.'~.µ ' ~ _ s,~~ ~ ~,~ ~:i~i~ _ ` ,~, ~r,~,~°; "n~+4E 'i`,~ a~ ~ y , ~- .~~ ~ ~~t. = :~.~ ".~,. ~ ~ :~ -~ =~'"; - ' r.- ft D_ate7Status _~~,: 1 Service of alcoholic drinks only in conjunction with full food 2/16/06 Complies menu, including hot meals 2 Deleted by Council N/A N/A 3 Submit updated floor plan to City Planner 3/2/06 SubmittedNerified by staff on 4/27/06 4 Serving alcohol limited to 11 a m to 2 a m 2/16/06 Complies 5 Comply with ABC regulations 2/16/06 No Complaints Complies 6 Conduct all business inside building 2/16/06 Complies 7 Keep doors closed during entertainment North (rear) doors 2/16/-O6 Complies used only for emergency exits from 8 p m to 2 a.m 8 All customers to use front (south) door Rear (north) parking lot 2/16/06 No Complaints for employees only Complies 9 No entertainment exceeding 60d6 between 10pm and lam or 2/16/06 No Complaints 65d8 between 7 a m and 10 p m No entertainment except that Complies allowed by Entertainment Permit No 91-03 10 No search lights, flashing orlight-animated signs 2/16/06 Complies 11 Clean and maintain front of rear of lease space, and parking lot 2/16/06 No Complaints Complies 12 Comply with all local, state, and federal laws, including Public Health Codes Make sure every employee has read and 2/16/06 Complies understands copy of conditions of approval provided. 13 No changes to floor plan, expansion, or other changes in 2/16/06 No Changes operation Complies 14 All signs shall conform to Sign Ordinance and Uniform Sign 2/16/06 Complies Program 15 Max 150 sq ft dance floor 2/16/06 Complies 16 Process for reconsideration of CUP 2/16/06 Complies 17 Post maximum occupancy of 233 persons 2/16/06 Complies 18 No adult entertainment 2/16/06 No Complaints Complies 19 One uniform security person in parking lot 8 p m to 2 a m Two 2/16/06 Uniforms uniform security person when parking lot 50% full Security (Jackets/T-Shirts) personnel to report crime to Police immediately Obtained Exfi,b,~ D ;. 20 No customer parking in rear (north) lot, in any adjacent 2/16/06 residential streets or other off-site Post parking signs accordingly. 21 Requirement for Progress Reports to Planning Commission 5/15/06 Complies 22 Establish Business Watch program for center 2/16/06 No Interest from Adjacent Businesses 23 Full food menu displayed and stating all items available during 2/16/06 Complies all business hours 24 Inspect and remove any litter in Ramona/Estacia Court 2/16/06 Complies/No neighborhoods at least 3 times a day complaints 25 Deny entrance to any person reasonably believed to have 2/16/06 Ongoing parked in Ramona/Estacia Court neighborhoods 26 Install additional urinal in men's restroom 4/16/06 Completed 27 Install speed bumps in north parking lo t 4/16/06 Completed R_: i- ~~7s'; ~ 3 ~ - M'x.w+h "' :~ twT'r NC- ~ ~5k ~~~ ~ ~ Spe`nd~'$20~000promoiing%expanding~~food_~jsales~~includirig~; a~*`.Js`di}~.'#'~"ieiY~'A=,~~C~f '~~£rG$~ ti~i»'v~~pftri~yt.~'n_`mY ^-'~'2e^fn^^py'i ~ ,t n ` n,c ~`;,-=~~J. q`s~", ~' { ~ ~ '~ *•- ri ~r~x,~~,-~~~.~a~};~_; Y'+~'" } ~~~" ' 6 .~ .W L a14 .~Hk.j ~.28~a ~ remodel;offkitehem. ,Add~pizzaboven Econvection=oven additwnal:~ ~~5~ ~,: w~ _~":ri=~ ~a ~ ~.~ s~< ~x~ e.~,, rt tio(boup r efng on~ romo s &tadvertis i ,)r ""~? "~k ;~ ] 1 -F~.r8/8/06 , ~ • _ ti Q~Ma+. ~ ~+nt ~, m~Complefed~`'•'" ' ~~~ ter, ; i ~ e on ~ ~ n9 ,M ~,~, ~P ~ ~; ; W ~~,w u ~,29~~ '°Y{ 4€HA~'k " ~ s.4`'--nuWdd'8Ja°:'27L€~"' -~'ve W ""i N'~+°~'r~; ~'P'~'"~ Install~Dead,End street signsa(2~~-~~_ p~ ~' ;1,~ - ~~~~-~~{ ~~y~1 ~iF "~' Liil`w"%1'F~ ~h .'"Ye6~~ ~ '~~i' ey~~ ' ~q`k`; zr' x,5/24/06' _~R't ~ ~c;'~~c~NY, -x. `sCompleted as *~„; ~lSA`R.~IfX4{.WA'~%*5Y , *~~ S v ~ ~,. - .r-r ~~~ ;:~_~ ~ ,r~ ~ ~-~ ~~ ~~+~ + _~>~- clescribedaabove wa . _ , _ .~ _w _, ; . , , ~ 31 Meet with Police every 60 days, preferably with neighbors 4/16/06 Ongoing 32 Meet with neighbors every 60 days 4/16/06 Sent Letter to Neighbors/No Response or interest J • G-g • r 1 LJ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA C~AMONGA AUGUST 23, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Maaas _ McPhail _ Munoz II. NEW BUSINESS A PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2006-00599 - KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC - A request for 283 multiple-family units on 19 3 acres within the Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Church Street, west of Malaga Drive and east of Mayten Avenue - APN 0227-151-49 III. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda IV. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Admmistrahve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission I, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 17, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga Vicinity Map ~ Planning Commission Workshop August 23, 2006 A ~ MeeLng Location " City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY ~ o I a% ~ COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, August 9, 2006 C~ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION AGENDA I. ROLL CALL: X Fletcher X McPhail ~ 1" X Henderson A Karraa `//~~v~l A Carlson Stewart (Alternate) Vacant Dickey (Alternate) Vacant Vacant (Alternate) n LJ II. NEW BUSINESS NONE 111. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Tratls Advisory Committee Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda IV. OLD BUSINESS A UPDATE ON THE TRAILS BUDGET PRIORITIES ACTION: Accepted the recommendations for Fiscal Year 2006/2007 budget priorities V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6 20 p m • c~.,~, ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY AUGUST 15, 2006 7 00 P M RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members CnsUne McPhail Pam Stewart Dan Coleman,, Alternates Lou Munoz Richard Fletcher Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR (All consent items heard at 7 p m ) (Emily/Willie) MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL U~E request to develop a commercial center o freestanding restaurant buldings and on within the Commundy Commercial Distnc Foothill , Boulevard, approximately 60 APN 0227-221-03, 07, 22, 23, 24 SUBTPM16767 ' PERMIT DRC2004-01128 -FRANK AN - A n 7 74 gross acres of land, consisting of ten e retail building totaling 51,200 square feet t (Subarea 4), located on the north side of 0 feet west of EUwanda Avenue - Related files Tentative Parcel Map (Jennifer/Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18190 - STONEFIELD DEVELOPMENT - A request to §ubdivide three parcels on 6 55 acres pf land to complete an existing tract map that was previously recorded (SUBTT16648), located on Heather Street, east of Dakota Avenue -APN 1076-331-02. This protect is categorically exempt from the regwrement of the California Envirom'nental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities) PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application The following items do not legally regwre any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input 710pm (Doug/Mark) DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-00005 - WILLIAM FOX GROUP - A request to construct 4 industrial buildings on 2.2 acres of land in the General Industrial Distract (Subarea 14), located on the west side of Hyssop Drive, north of 6th Street File SUBTPM17836 -APN 0229-271-31, 32, and 37 DRC AGENDA August 15, 2006 Page 2 730pm (Larry/Shelley) ' 750pm' (Mike D/Joe) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND MASTER PLAN DRC2005-00361 - FILIPPI WINERY - PITASSI ARCHITECTS - A proposal to develop a master plan and development agreement to gwde the development of the 14-acre Fdippi Winery site at 12467 Base Line Road ~ APN 227-161-10 and 1089-581-04 Gardens Lane -APN 0227-464-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00825 - INVESTWEST GROUP LLC - A request to construct asingle-story 5,600 square foot, retail budding on .73 acre of land within the Route 66 Outparceis area of the Victoria Gardens Lifestyle Center in the Mixed Use Distract of the Victoria Community Plan, located at 8048 Victoria PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may recewe testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting Comments are limited to froe minutes per indwidual ADJOURNMENT 1, Gad Elwood, Office Speaal~st 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 10, 2006, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per • Government Code Section 54954 2 at 10500 C~v~c Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga , ii:GfclAa, l ~ww ~ ~r~~'e~ o~ • CONSENT CALENDAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Emily Cameron August 15, 2006 MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, DRC2004-01128 - FRANK AN - A request to develop a commercial center on 7 74 gross acres of land, consisting of ten freestanding restaurant buildings and one retail building totaling 51,200 square feet within the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-221-03, 07,22,23,24 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16767 Design Parameters The protect was originally approved by the Planning Commission on September 14, 2005, for all ten freestanding restaurant buildings and one retail bwlding, totaling 51,200 square feet Originally, the Conditional Use Permit allowed only sit-down restaurants and met the mirnmum requirements for parking The applicant originally agreed not to provide any type of fast-food use because of the minimal parking provided Since the approval, the applicant has spoken to several tenants that would like to locate a retail shop on the east side of the protect (Bwlding L) The applicant is proposing to connect Bwlding K and L with one wall The applicant also has a tenant who would like to open an ice • cream/coffee shop along Foothill Boulevard (Bwlding C,) which would require a modification to the Conditional Use Permit to allow afast-food type use in this bulding only The parking has been modified at a minimum to provide the additional three parking spaces regwred. All other bwldings are proposed as approved at the last Planning Commission hearing Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion , regarding this protect 1 The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve issues • Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 If any increase in square footage is added to any building/restaurant or retail shop, the protect shall be brought back to the Design Review Committee/ Planning Commission for review and approval, subtect to additional conditions Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 If the applicant plans to modify other shops or restaurants in this protect, an additional modification to the original Conditional Use Permit will be regwred C~ DRC AGENDA ~ ~ DRC2004-01128 - FRANK AN ~ • August 15, 2006 Page 2 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee review the protect and recommend approval to the Planning Commission , Design Review Committee Action Staff Planner. Emily Cameron Members Present , • • ~~ Y ' . CONSENT CALENDAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Jennfer Fechn2r August 15, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18190 - STONEFIELD DEVELOPMENT - A request to subdivide three p8rcels on 6 55 acres of land to complete an existing tract map that was previously Yecorded (SUBTT16648), located on Heather Street, east of Dakota Avenue - APN. 1076-331-02 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Faalities) Desion Parameters The project site is located on Heather Street, east of Dakota Avenue, and west of Valinda Avenue The site was approved on April 28, 2004, to subdivide 7 77 acres of land into 8 lots, consisting of one private Storage center (Aim All Storage) and seven single-family homes Tract Map SUBTT16648 was officially recorded on June 24, 2005 On April 27, 2005, DRC2004-01117 was approved for the construction of seven single-family homes During the construction of these homes„ an inconsistency was discovered between the location of the block walls and the recorded property lines A lot line adjustment (SUBLLA632) was filed for Lots 2 through 5, however, additional lots required property line adjustments The • Subdivision Map Act states that a lot line adjustment can only be filed and recorded for up to four lots The remaining Ibts that regwre property line adjustments must be processed through a new tract or parcel map The applicant proposes moving the east and west property lines of Parcels 1, 2, and 3 to be consistent with the block walls that were constructed for the previously approved single-family homes These property line adjustments maintain the regwred side yard setbacks and do not substantially change the dimensions or overall square footage of the lots affected Staff Comments• The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. There are no Major Issues Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action Staff Planner Jennifer Fechner Members Present • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Doug Fenn August 15, 2006 , DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-00005 -WILLIAM FOX GROUP - A request to construct 4 industrial buildings on 2 2 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located on the west side of Hyssop Drive, north of 6th Street Related file SUBTPM17836 - APN 0229 271 31, 32, and 37 Desioh Parameters The property is bound to the west by the I-15 freeway and to the east by a Southern California Edison utility corridor The site is mostly vacant and is dominated by short grasses and shrubs At the north end of the protect site, is a vacant parcel which has been approved for a similar like industrial protect The zoning of the property to the north, south and east is General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 14 The subtect property is generally level with a subtle slope from the north and south side of the property Primary access will be via Hyssop Drive Employee parking, comprised of 74 stalls, wdl be generally located at the south and north sides of the site All truck parking will be located at the east side of the site The landscape coverage is 16 5 percent, the minimum regwrement is 12 percent for this development district • The architecture of the proposed bwlding is generally consistent with other industrial buildings located along Interstate 15 Key features include sandblasted 'pop-outs' at equal intervals along the building elevations, articulated office corners, and an enhanced primary entrance defined by spandrel and wsion glazing with a cantilevered canopy over the primary entrance Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Site Plan -Revise to provide one truck trailer parking space per truck loading dock door (see sheet A-00 where the applicant proposes a future dock high door without a trailer parking storage space), 2 For bwldings "A" and "B" extend the 8-foot high solid screen along the entire length of the trailer parking space 3 Provide a shade trellis over the employee outdoor eating area 4 On the north and south sides of the subtect site, delete the gravel area and replace with landscape Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the • Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues DRC AGENDA DRC2006-00005 -WILLIAM FOX GROUP ~ i ' August 15, 2006 • Page 2 1 Provde decorative paving at the courtyard/plaza areas ' 2 All trash enclosures shall be constructed per the Gty's design standard for industrial '' , protects ' Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be ' incorporated into the protect design without discussion ' 1 Incorporate undulating berms along the Hyssop Drive frontage, within the landscape setback and landscape areas , 2. Screen all roof-mounted egwpment with pardpet walls 3 Decorative paving shall be provided at the pnmary vehicular access point on to the site ' 4 All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency~access) shall be painted to match the adjacent wall panel ~ ' 5 Provide durable street furniture in the outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles Staff Recommendation: ~ Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and return as a • consent calendar dem , Design Review Committee Action Staff Planner Doug Fenn Members Present. • ~' • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS ' 7:30 p.m. Larry Henderson August 15, 2006 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND MASTER PLAN DRC2005-00361 - FILIPPI WINERY - PITASSI ARCHITECTS - A proposal to develop a~ master plan and development agreement to gwde the development of the 14-acre Fdippi Winery site at 12467 Base Line Road - APN 227-161-10 and 1089-581-04 • Design Parameters The subtect winery iand/complex is proposed to be developed as a mixed-use protect with, restaurants, residential dwellings, and an art gallery as well as, several site and building enhancements The protect area was heavily used during historic times and has been subtect to substantial suburban and agricultural development The site is relatively flat, draining to the south The site borders a commercal shopping center on the west, residential and commercial across Base Line Road on the north, and residential to the south. Vineyard improvements are significantly highlighted to support the winery and provide a buffer to the residential areas to the east and south The use of the site is also regulated by a lease agreement that restricts uses to a winery and winery related uses. On December 7, 2005, the City Counal held a workshop with the applicant to discuss the master plan Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee • discussion Major Issues There are no mator design issues identified. However, it should be noted that the Design Review Committee is reviewing the master plan exhibits, not the actual development agreement, since that document is incomplete, and we are waiting for a re-submittal. Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wdl discuss the following secondary design issues A neighborhood meeting is requmed and is scheduled for August 8, 2006, at the winery Staff wdl report orally on this at the DRC meeting Staff had requested that the applicant address the land use conflict of the winery loading areas and artist work live lofts The applicant's response was, "The activity which wdl take place along the loading area at the southern edge of the bwlding of the winery, will be intermittent, and the units which derive access from the drive aisle adtacent to the loading area, do not "front" on this drive aisle space We believe that the physical separation and the landscaping along the southern edge of the drive aisle will mitigate activity occurring in the loading area " 3 Cross-Section D-D and E-E do not indicate how the existing windows wdl be accommodated See attached for pictures and cross comparison. 4 Plans for the artist work/live lofts patio or balcony areas for a typical area needs to be provided • I,y I I 1 DRC AGENDA DRC2005-00361 -FILLIPI WINERY-PITAS~SI ARCHITECTS i ' August 15, 2006 • Page 2 ~ , 5 The applicant wishes to provide a sign master plan at a later time The DRC should prowde direction as to whether this is acceptable and at what time the requirement should be conditioned to occur ~ '' , Pohcv Issues There are no major policy issues, identified Artist worWhve' lofts must be carefully described An incompatibility issue may arise in the complex of the neighborhood if not defined expliatly This policy area is being developed as part of the development agreement and commurnty plan amendment application process Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the 'Design Review Committee provide direction to staff and the applicant on the issues outlined and any other issues that may be identrfied dunng the consideration of this application Design Review Committee Action. Staff Planner Larry Henderson Members Present. r1 LJ • • • • ~1-~}achm~nf' I III ^ ` i Y I EX 1 I I EX ~~ III li Y ~ Si :~ 111 II it II •I I II 11 II ~q~// t1 I[MES 11 1 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Mike Diaz August 15, 2006 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00825 - INVESTWEST GROUP LLC - A request to construct asingle-story 5,600 square foot, retail budding on 73 acre of land within the Route 66 Outparcels area of the Victoria Gardens Lifestyle Center in the Mixed Use Distract of the Victoria Community Plan, located at 8048 Victoria Gardens Lane - APN 0227-464-40 Design Parameters The subtect protbct is located within the Route 66 area of the Victoria Gardens Master Plan All interior roadways, parking areas, and perimeter landscaping within the Route 66 area was previously installed by Forest City Protects within the Route 66 area are regwred to reflect the architectural styles (e g , Mission, Craftsman, Art Deco/Streamline Moderne, and Adobe/Pueblo) that were indicative of the historic roadside retail buildings found on U S Route 66 The protects within the Route 66 area are subtect to final approval by the Planning Director following a review and approval of the protect design by the Design Review Committee (DRC). Project Description and Architectural Design• Designed in the Art Moderne style, the proposed building has a combination of smooth lines and curves, flat surfaces, and little ornament The bwlding is reminiscent of a small town municipal bwlding of the 1930s, such as a aty library or police department The exterior design features include a recessed front entry (east side of the building), steel canopy above all windows, storefront window glazing/doors, and roll-up garage • doors for the north and south elevations, custom designed to match the storefront windows. The primary exterior material will be plaster painted in a dark tone at the base of the building, with the remaining portion of the building being a lighter tone brown gray color Decorative exterior light fixtures are proposed around the building between the window and door openings Signs are shown to depict locations of future signs Landscaping will be added to all sides of the bwiding to supplement that which exists on the perimeter of the site. Three Pear (Pyrus calleryana) trees (along with new shrubs and groundcovers) will be added across the west side of the building Twenty-three (23) parking spaces are regwred; the site provides 29 on-site parking spaces, including 2 for disabled persons. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues None Staff finds the overall design of the proposed building to be appropriate and in keeping with the desired goal for the Route 66 area Secondary Issues However, staff believes the protect could be further enhanced with the following changes 1 Provide catalog cuts for the exterior light fixtures and details for roll-up garage doors. 2. Provde a color board for the protect and presentation to the Design Review Committee. Code Issues The following items are a matter of City Ordinance and shall be incorporated into the protect design without discussion • 1 All roof-mounted egwpment shall be screened from direct wew from the street by the parapet wall of the budding DRC AGENDA DRC2005-00825 - INVESTWEST GROUP LLC ~ ~ August 15, 2006 ' ~ Page 2 ~ • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the protept Design Review Committee Action , ' Staff Planner Michael Diaz , Members Present • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIRECTOR AGENDA TUESDAY AUGUST 22, 2006 2:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Planning Department Conference Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED I, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 17, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga `~ / " •