The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006/09/27 - Agenda PacketTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C~AMONGA SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Cail Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Fletcher _ Macias _ McPhail _ Munoz _ • II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 13, 2006 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign in after speaking A MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01128 - FRANK AN - A request to develop a commercial center on 7 74 gross acres of land consisting of ten freestanding restaurant buildings and one retail building totaling 51,200 square feet within the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227- 221-03, 07, 22, 23, and 24 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16767 • 1 nfZ _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. PUBLIC COMMENTS Thts rs the Gme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/oumment time If items go beyond that Gme, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted of September 21, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Nolifcation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience • • 2of3 • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 RANCHO CucACaaNCA The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission deasion may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at htto:l/www ci rancho-cucamonpa ca us 3 of 3 .' Vicinity Map ~ Planning Commission September 27, 2006 • Q ~ Meeting Location N City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California • • I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roli Call Chairman Stewart _ Vice Chairman Fletcher Macias _ McPhail _ Munoz II. ANNOUNCEMENTS II III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES II August 9, 2006 II IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS II A CONSIDERATION OF DEMOLITION PERMIT DRC2006-00714 -HANK JONG - A review of historic and cultural significance in response to proposed demolition of the structure in the Low Density Residential district, located at 6928 Hellman Avenue - APN 0202-041-62 II V. PUBLIC COMMENTS II This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA l~,cHO SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 cucnn~oNCn Page 2 VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lors J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 21, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 t'.IVIC Center Dnve, Rancho Cuca nga r"Li Cy INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items I • C~ • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANGHG SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 CUCAMONGA Page 3 AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal Clty holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be duetted to the Clty Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commisslon (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session. Copies of the Planning Commisslon agendas and minutes can be found at http /Iwww ci rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours priorto the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Historic Preservation Commission ~ September 27, 2006 ~~ Q ~ Meeting Location " City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • s~r~~ DATE September 27, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Rozalynne Thompson, Contract Planner SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF DEMOLITION PERMIT DRC2006-00714 -HANK JONG - A review of historic and cultural sigmficance in response to proposed demolition of the structure in the Low Density Residential district (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6928 Hellman Avenue - APN 0202-041-62 BACKGROUND • A Abstract The applicant filed a Bwiding Permit application to demolish an existing, unoccupied residence and garage located at 6928 Hellman Avenue in March 2006 The applicant had filed Subdivision and Development Review applications (SUBTT16752 and DRC2005-00647) with the Planning Department for the construction of nine homes at the protect site several months prior to applicant's submittal of the Demolition Permit application Staff deferred review of the Demolition Permit unttl the Historic Preservation Commission determined the cultural and historic significance of the structures based upon a cultural resource study (as provided by the applicant, prepared by SWCA Consultants in June 2006) as reference B Site Characteristics The site is atriangular-shaped parcel located west of the "T" intersection of Monte Vista Street and Hellman Avenue it is approximately 3 24 acres with a drainage easement along the southwest property line The site slopes to the southwest into the drainage easement The land use zoning of the site and the surrounding area is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwellings per acre) The site is surrounded by existing single-family development to the east, west, and north, which are zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) The subfect structures are located near the northeast corner of the protect site Mature trees flank the residence and garage to the north and south. ANALYSIS A General , The subject structures are asingle-family dwelling and a detached garage The dwelling appears to have been constructed around 1942, based upon a tax assessment property profile The house appears to be designed in the Shotgun vernacular with Craftsman elements It has a gabled roof and appears to be a single-story structure from the front • elevation From the rear elevation, however, the dwelling appears to be a two-story structure because the main level is above the finished basement area The deep overhang of the gabled roof in the front elevation forms the entry porch The entrance porch has two, ITEM A HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00714 September 27, 2006 Page 2 single-post supports with braces The porch almost extends the full width of the front elevation of the structure, with decorative brackets under the roof eave The roof consists of composite shingle with a low to moderate pitch, with an extended overhang on the front elevation to accommodate the front porch The exterior wall surfaces include a mix of stucco, clapboard siding, brick and wood sheeting, while the windows on the structure include wood, aluminum, and vinyl frames A hot tub and rear deck are to the rear of the structure, with an equipment room immediately adfacent According to tax records, the house is approximately 984 square feet, exclusive of the basement area Although the date of construction of the garage is unknown, it appears to have been constructed around the same time as the house The square footage of the garage is also unknown The garage is detached from the house, but a red brick path connects the south side of the house to the entry door of the garage, which is located at the northeast corner of the garage Like the dwelling, the garage is gable-roofed with composite shingle roofing Exterior materials of the garage include uncoursed rubble walls of undressed stone and mortared red brick It appears that the garage door was once functional since the garage and adfoining driveway are oriented toward Hellman Avenue The garage door has been removed and finished with clapboard siding to form a fully enclosed bwlding Also, the interior of the garage has been finished with sheetrock and a false ceiling composed of acoustic panels • Staff concurs with the conclusion of the Cultural Resource Study prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants in June 2006, that the house and garage should not be deemed a historic resource for the following reasons first, the vernacular bwldings and structures on the • property do not embody distinctive characteristics or represent the works of a master, second, are not associated with significant events m local, state, regional, or national history, third, are not associated with persons significant m local, state, regional, or national history, and, fourth, have no unique information to yield in local, state, regional, or national history If the Commission allows the demolition and new development occurs, the new development will have to comply with all current Development Code standards, including setback and parking requirements LANDMARK DESIGNATION REVIEW CRITERIA "When designating a landmark, the Histonc Preservation Commission and the City Council shall consider the following criteria as a guide in making rts determination" [RCMC Section 2 24 090] A. Historical and Cultural Sionificance Finding The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life Facts Although the structures have several features of the Craftsmen Bungalow and Colonial Revival architectural styles, none of those characteristics are notable Finding The proposed landmark is a greater age than most of its kind FacUs Assuming that the garage was bwlt at the same time as the dwelling, the approximate age of both structures is 64 years Designated Local Landmarks A- 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00714 • September 27, 2006 Page 3 within a mile of the house and garage range in age from 85 years to 121 years 2 Finding The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality FacUs There is no record that the bwlding was connected with anyone renowned or important or a local personality 3 Finding The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use that was once common but is now rare Facts Given that the structures are asingle-family dwelling and garage, it is not connected to a rare use B Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance 1 Finding The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual FacUs The structures are designed in the Shotgun vernacular with some Craftsmen Bungalow features The architectural features of the house and garage • include a low to moderate roof pitch, composite shingle roofs, deeply overhanging eaves, entry doors at the front and rear elevations, and a mix of exterior materials (brick, stone, wood siding) However, numerous exterior and interior modifications, by owner/tenant and trespassers, have significantly diminished its original architectural character and significance These modifications include the garage enclosure, completion of the basement, and the boarded windows of the dwelling and garage C Neighborhood and Geographic Setting 1 Finding The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood Facts The structures are located within a mile of seven Designated Local Landmarks, the Palmer Ranch House (5708 Hellman Avenue), the G P Ledig House (5759 Hellman Avenue), the Huber Ranch/Kalbach House (5991 Hellman Avenue), the Warren/Thorpe House (6112 Hellman Avenue), Goerlitz House (6156 Hellman Avenue), the Lord House (6797 Hellman Avenue) and the McCorkle-Nesbit House (7608 Hellman Avenue) The house and garage at 6928 Hellman Avenue do not materially benefit the historic character of the neighborhood because the various exterior modifications have significantly diminished the architectural character of the house and garage Furthermore, the age of the house and garage (approximately 64 years) is not comparable to that of the surrounding Designated Local Landmarks (the structures range in age from • 85-121 years) A- 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00714 September 27, 2006 Page 4 Finding The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city FacUs Although the house and garage have been m the neighborhood for 64 years, it has been unoccupied for several years, has attracted vandals and trespassers, and has not been mamtamed Staff concludes that demolition of the structures will remove a familiar, but unsightly, visual feature within the neighborhood D Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Gudelines The protect qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(1)(1) (Demolition and removal of individual small structures) because the house and garage are defined as small structures and there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment PROPOSED DEMOLITION If deemed to be a Historic Landmark, demolition would require that a Landmark Alteration Permit be granted by the Historic Preservation Committee if one of the following conditions is met, in accordance with Title 2 24 120 of Ordinance 70 • The alteration will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, • architectural, or engineering interest or value of a historic nature The alteration is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on the property The applicant has demonstrated denial of the application that will result in immediate or substantial hardship RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission determine that the structure does not meet the City's criteria for a local Landmark Designation and approve the demolition of the structure located at 6928 Hellman Avenue Respectfully submitte~d,~,~/~~ ~~ James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director DC rdUge Attachments Exhibit A -Site Location Map Exhibit B -Primary Record Survey Form with Photographs • A- 4 a Q x ti 2 ~ 'exei# iYt~ tF` y' "41 +~~~ '1 ~'f ~ tk ~ i 'k } s = ~dt li yi='t :i~°t; ti.;`, 'F '~>-Zi Se i ~,~ *I ! -y :.S„ saS;- -@~~~-~ \~ i r ~~ yh t t T3`~k i FK !' a~`FYl;~ ii: n`~`> l ! ~S ~ \s 1 ~ ! e ~ !ia ~~ a h~ !. G ~c 'v'1 A ~ t.\} Fit l~ ~ `~` \1 } !k.~+~1t^I ~ 4 ti } .'t~ ~ l` 3 ci~~ ~~~.~~~~,~x ~.y'v'_l~'~~'~~~~Y ~~~(~;_~~\~~~;t O ~~~,~ ~'~ F k#~ ~ ~'i~ ~~~~ s ~ k 3F 5t ~'! ~x~ \Z F, i;Y##-, is~y ~'j~'1~. ;lis~i:'.`~t • ~ .5. s i ~ k 1.~ ~ ! !i =1 ~~31! ~~ 2^'y F of .yYir\F~';y W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~ •. ~ ~ j iY ! 'x''! ~ z , q ' V ~ ~?#y ;~i*{i~~ I =ii#~i~ iF ~~6~~sF~~~`i ~ \l`#~\l ~ sF Z i F .~, ~~ 3~~~ i r ~. 'F, 1~~'u~`~~\<;.4iFi~'~°~i~'~}t~-;~,'~~t~] Itsx~~lt ,k~ l4 #a }(4' ~ 1 _ ''vas ~ ~~` ~ C _ •c , F ~ :,~ phi"4F.1`~';°w~~i#~~i s~~l f~~ M F ~ - j y ~` : ~~i > ~. k j ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~~1 ~~ kC#~ cll `e ~~ #'1~}"•1 `4~k,~ W 1 ~~ e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'f, ~y F ~ ~ _ ~~ ~ s F>,1 s: ~ ~#~1~.~.1F~`ta`l.;tl ~.\~vl~~tc~~~ 1 #Sa#~ hF26ll~ ~ ;R1i,.~~~i-: ;C'4~;4~C:~y~is 3 d ~xt'_,~.ih _.,.~.. ~ .. ~ ~. a A. ~dYE` '~~~~~ st.'€ ~s~1~~~7! ~=f's~2^r..~w~~'..R`-_ L'~`t..l F~`+;~x@y.rR P7. Other Identifier: Former residence of Mr Robert Murphy 'P2.Location. ^ Not for Publication ®Unrestricted •a. County San Bernardino and •b. USGS 7.5' Ouad Guasti, CA Date 1966. P 1981 T 1 N, R 7W, unsectioned , SB B.M. c Address 6928 N Hellman Ave City Rancho Cucamonca Zip 91701 d UTM NAD 83 Zone 11 S 444403E 37776603N LCenter of housel 444406E 37776593N (Center of carace) e Other Locational Data From Interstate 210, exit Carnelian South on Carnelian, east on Base Line, and south on Hellman Ave Address is on west side of Hellman 'P3a. Description: The house located at 6928 Heilman Avenue was identified as constructed in 1942 in a tax assessment property profile. No information regarding the construction date of the ad)acent garage was provided, however, it appears to be cpntemporaneous with the house The cold-jointed concrete foundation of the house and presence of at least one double sash wood frame window support this construction date The two-story house ~s gable-roofed with a single bay entrance porch on a gable end and appears single-story from the front It has undergone numerous modifications since its original construction and has a composite shingle roof Various exterior wall surfaces include stucco, clapboard siding, brick and wood sheeting, while windows on the structure include wood, aluminum, and vinyl frames as well as one aluminum-framed bay window The house has a rear deck with a hot tub constructed over a patio and room housing hot tub egwpment and a water heater The house is recorded as occupying 984 square feet, however, this appears to exclude the lower level, which may be a finished basement The garage is gable-roofed and finished with uncoursed rubble walls of undressed stone The corners of garage as well as the edge of the side doorway are mortared red brick and the assumed former location of the garage door (facing the driveway and street) has been finished with clapboard siding and a window, which was boarded up at the time of the survey The entry to the back door is constructed of coldyointed concrete The interior of the garage was finished with sheetrock and a false ceiling composed of acoustic panels Despite the windows and doors of the house and garage being boarded up, it appeared that squatters and various and competing gang members hav~ occupied or used the house and garage numerous times since their vacancy by lawful residents Thi occupation was indicated by broken windows and broken door locks, graffiti on most of the interior walls, and occupational debris within both structures •P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2 Single-family property 'P4 Resources Present• ®Building ^ Structure ^Oblect ^Site ^District ^Element of District P5b(1) Description of Photo House, facng west June 12, 2006 (more on Continuation Sheet) •P6 Date Constructed/Ageend Sources ®Historic (1942) ^Prehistoric ^Both •P7 Owner and Address. Eastland Development, LLC 1227E Valley Blvd , #109 Alhambra, California 91803 'P8. Recorded by Kevin Hunt SW CA Environmental Consult 625 Fair Oaks Ave ,Suite 190 South Pasadena, CA 91030 •P9.Date Recorded• 06/12/06 'P10 Survey Type (describe) Reconnaissance •P11. Report Citation Hunt et a: 2006 Cultural Resources Survey and Histonc Architectural Evaluation for the Hellman Avenue Subdivision Pro/ect, San Bernardino County, Caldorn~a •Attachments• ^NONE ®Location Map ®Continuation Sheet ®Building, Structure, and Object Record Q-' '6 'Regwred information EXHIBIT B Page 1 of 6 Resource Name or #• (Assigned by recorder) Residence at 6928 N Hellman Avenue State'of~Cellfomie-~The,ResourcesAgency'~~'~ti~ -' ~.>Y • ~"~ ~ ',~i:'T,',°!a.~'~~~ ~~'3' f``~'~'"•"= ~~'A`~'"`"' ~a'F a~`.` ' DEP,AR~ Primary#:'o- v r„x,,,.;.r.,:v.f+.,:^d, ,},w,yu~,t,~,.''c;,Yjr~, ^~;' TMENT OF PARKS ANDAECREATION 5~ cy ~'1Iy"' ~ "' ~ *'"~` ~-'t' m=.~ -~" •'' ' ~"I nE..d.,Jy ,.r, Ses..a r.. n .,- , ~. F1RI#,. " ~s~.•r., x`= a~u n"..:~~; •. u, w.1_`s~Irth<uz:>e_rr~4::a,%~~i ~fp',. 'LOCA~ION;MAP -- - '~.'~ - -' ~.4°_• ~.'€,,, _~-r ~~;~` ~ ' ;~~~ ~,.;;-~'r: ~,x"..• z= ~~ try ~ ~, ~,~a . I, , ;F.. i qZ iii z`z,. ^- ~i.y 4 ;','h.~ ^,r, ~" S~:q' w -z pe ,-,c-orE' _= .-°:.~ :,4,~,,_. -~'al;.-Trlnomlel, _ fs.,.'h,:Ya'%=eti'~Y>re`~"",-a!<c°.c~~~_.Sd a'~,,, , ' h r,. • Page 2 of 6 •Resource Name or # Residence at 6928 N Hellman Avenue 'Map Neme• Guasti. California 'Scale• 1 24.000 `Date of map• 1966. P 1981 ~~ a"Y, ;y".s-~'Yy J+:...'~L;t"'-`-, rxtr~~~~• /^ __-_ "~„j~+:,.:• \ ~i ~1 :,5' }~=_.~uK .lav`nr anE~ 0. ~,~*1 ^r1'P e;ytik=lTi.. 1'" °~}.q4"~•;Fi e11v'~k~^_r .S'~ `,%'^-+~ ?9r, ~M .y" ~r '"'`i a "n~ u?:'= ._ ~~m^:.I• . t •,~~ a t t ~ r<~.< I t: sa'1 ~ x'.b ~ .w 5 r ~~- •,......; .. , Y,z,.s. t ~ I y1h''t°'",.~~~ rt g r~7 1I. ^~~' p+tar,, Los An eles Sen Bemertl, a' iT. wv F '~i Sr' U.,-..~/s~ ' J. ~J' -.b`x 4"wA; ~. ,1 ASS n"Sf~,.1 iJA1lk ^Jx s.~F~;"' :I•, -~' e r, ,k•• wu ndzN;~c' ~.. ~ yxn. o~:.;, °~Lg ~iiLn'±±=ma~y` r_ ,~. '~ ~ 'x,.~~'i}.. C~.~,,, ~sK. .ev •-",ems` • "~~r ~'I~ ~ dt 1~~ my ' :4'.+"5"'°"t ..+~ ~l? _~ V! J".t~A °^'< ~~~~,,~,~..x ,.~~~.. ~` ••~:~. P • / . i,J ~'^ f ..- ~ ~L .~;i".umttl"rkYt~~w _,U ~7Q.:'+F.x, ¢sl` "'~ ;tea ;,r..S_ ~~.;~_ •~', ,7~ •~ '` ~"'. dal".""gam, u. ~'e ".;1• ~s~?,* 4y,, ,~~A,~„@-.-~.' 7-~ Rrvereme ' :'~~, _ .i t .. I~~' ~ ..y~r'M ~ n''~~6 .~ _ -1~"`::sd t~,'i~".. r ~ 'St' "4 ~ ` Oren9e \ , ' ~,: .~: ~ ~~ '~, `i&rir'.a` i~. 1~~s ..''_...~~-mr«=c°<.'~*`~sm.K ~:s. ~ ~.I. ,~ ~ ... _ 1 ~.`a.•..- ::::-~~~.. ~:~4~.."'~-~.,gS .,~'~'~!, ~M~°•slf,2, LOm& n c~' ~t~~~ LLt' 2`.u=.+"'a ~~ S_yCxn. rlmPeh ,rar£: :y. ^•• e., • nr -v-r m«,. c ~ y i1v.W: 'tr'w'P' ~ i ~~y ar~ ~ yre i2~' ~ rt I •~~.~.~; ;~1_.•.%, .iAlta i.~ma ~~ r~~~.~--~ r~ 4a~dly~ I:c~,. O ~.}' ~+~ , ~'},I~ •V ~_ N,~a~',1~1,~,14 ~~= °d,4 _ , tiL~ r ~ ^4 f Y ti.a._ ACS ^' ~ 9U4'J{,,rt'"1.~"„ x~)q_ F '~-.r r_ . .~ ~ ahf I l • II ~ _ hk F~ ' ~ rRA.,. I ~ • , - •~ ~,+,j ~ Ayrk'"'i44 ~' ' 1.. ~ ^- f^I W z~U~~iav(~ I~T ~ C. Om 8 c •4 , mp- (" 11 ,a z/4At t' _, i%~, "~ ~~~~w$ _~~~ ~ .tip k '\' a^"r1~x~h~,,'i1'S~".,-,G~ ,\ ~`~`: ,~I, ' i~'. 'Ca+j„5~~`r i~ :. 9~„; I ~""~~r.~ ~•. i ~M`~W Mr"~~" 1~_~~'~~a ,~ ~:,t. .1..3 •*~" /i {d (, ~uF t~,~,. te~w'y.:,"urrt..~~µ T .,3wnr~c ~ F a'~ ~{~74 ~_ 1 r7'?~ i^5'I p :=1, ~7 art: r~' ~ s -~" - o, . .f° ~~`k ~Iy; ~r _ ,~,15~ a~_ ` ~~,yv,~,,a,{+~Yi f ~ • ° y.~=e ~` i; i' _ ~ ~ ~ Ky~ `t'.'' • e` ~'r', "' -'„•G .fit .ta+i~a3-I _<-~ ~-~__=~"5~~V~~.. I~_. .~~'-~' .~yL'^'rv~~::a~~_~ ." 'yam, F-~.,T.y' a ~ 1 F'PV. ~ Sir 41F 1 t u ., ~'•.,n.l~ ~f i i Y ,. $ ' ` .. '+ral'I ~~ i '' Ia ~tii •7~w~se <r, y trl " <,~•" ~.,..2,__ `rz3 I psi ~f'~, ,~ -_' -_ ~ a,_w.t}5='!"P~.k".~%.''•SyJlh'yt:~'tFa,^._ .tr.,t._rd _ c. +r; n~r. F ••" -.•• House = „y , E~ ~ r', -L_cs ~onadrt I "3-it:i~~l=+ ker- .- ^-..• 3 -..\ . m!.ptx ~l.~! ~~~i.'iN,;'P: mal ts~rk`~ n ika' X11• '~-... ~ , _ - ~~~ttt ''' P _ ~w~ ••~i~ < w- ~ _ •la ,y~ I I ~ Jr~~:,'3"I~ni;;f'i .:~I;-~t ~P"~ W --- e 1 re J,>,F TE~i i ~.-- s ~ _.~-ct' ~ 4~ :1 Garage •- ,° rR// .~I as r x a _ ^ i 2 __-_ , ~~% J -L.••---:•:•%%>;~r.'^ Wis.=~,'.'~'.~`f`<=;; g~ . - ' % , %'f =\ .O nu apron II t ~': ~', ~-'T- `---~ -- ' $ )• ~ I N r Y'p -~~ ~ a D 250 M500~ 1,000 SWCA ^N • Q Structure 0 500 1,000 Feet 2,000 a,ooo N ReSidenCe at 6928 N. I~ 1 2a,ooo Hellman Avenue USGS 7 5' Quadrangle GuaeB 1986 Photorav,sed 1981 and Cucamonga Peak 1968 Photorev,sed 1988 Hellman Avenue Subdivision DPR 523J (1/95) A 7 'Required Information gnty'~ y~n' .ilr~ of i ~'.R• M1i i ,'ni ~'~°' ~~~ ~„j; ,`,,~~a~~~?~s;t;,4~~'~_srr,'~~'~TeofCalifornie"=TheResou~ces`A enc i~ +~r''`'~ P~nma #~ DEPARTMENT~OF PARKS AND RECREATION': "'"+. °~'',; (-~G'~`,~,~; _,- ~~ HRl#, ~' ' ' ~- ~'A'~~,~'-=` -' =~ii'S: ~' "'' r~~q _ '_' a~ is t 'y ~,.. r. ~ x p t 4 '..~r~y'{^ '`7n. •~,.^ s,. ~ raw yti: Y . "~"- S di'i„W, ~• _ `~'~4;•r"~l~ ",',{~~.~ 'B,I~ILDI'NG STRUCTURE''-AiVD'0'BJECT;RECORD '"' `"'"~'`'~'`'~`~LL~-9=y "-`` - ~'~" '~'~`~':'-`' ..1T-. f{~ ~ ..S~z .~i~ J'~h-. t~1 _KGn aCWF _ - rtr'i ~~,1+1 ~~lVni Jn' atis Y. ~" ~r'i~tr'~`iY~145 Page 3 of 6 •NRHP Status Code 6Z • •Resource Name or # Residence at 6928 N Hellman Avenue B1 Historic Name - B2 Common Name Residence at 6926 N Hellman Avenue B3 Original Use Residence (possibly used as dairy, too) B4 Present Use Unoccupied •B5 Architectural Style: Vernacular •BS. Construction History The house located at 6928 Hellman Avenue was identified as constructed in 1942 in a tax assessment property profile No information regarding the construction date of the adjacent garage was provided, however, it appears to be contemporaneous with the house The coldyointed concrete foundation of the house and presence of at least one double sash wood frame window support this construction date The single-story house is gable-roofed with a single bay entrance porch on a gable end and appears single-story from the front (see continuation sheets) It has undergone numerous modifications since its original construction and has a composite shingle roof Various exterior wall surfaces include stucco, clapboard siding, brick and wood sheeting, while windows on the structure include wood, aluminum, and vinyl frames as well as one aluminum-framed bay window The house has a rear deck with a hot tub constructed over a patio and a room housing the hot tub equipment and a water heater The house is recorded as occupying 984 square feet, however, this appears to exclude the lower level, which appears to be a finished basement The garage is gable-roofed and finished with corners and doorframe of red brick, alternating with uncoursed rubble walls of undressed stone (see Plates 6 and 7) The assumed former location of the garage door (facing the driveway and street) has been finished with clapboard siding and a window, which was boarded up at the time of the survey The entry to the back door is constructed of coldyointed concrete The interior of the garage was finished with sheetrock and a dropped ceiling composed of acoustic panels. Despite the windows and doors of the house and garage being boarded up, it appeared that squatters and various and suspected gang members have occupied or used the house and garage numerous times since their vacancy by lawful residents This occupation was indicated by broken windows and broken door locks, graffiti on most of the interior walls, and occupational debris within both structures •B7 MovedT No Yes Unknown Date. Original Location• •B0. Related Features. • The setting is on the east side of an unnamed wash that has been channelized into a storm drain In general, the protect area is east of Cucamonga Creek on the broad floodplain south of the San Bernardino Mountains B9a Architect Unknown b Builder Unknown ' •610 Significance: Theme -- Residence Area Rancho Cucamonca. San Bernardino County Period of Significance c 1940-c 1970 Property Type Buildinc (complex) Applicable Criteria None (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural content as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope Also address integrity ) After application of CRHR/NRHP eligibility criteria, the components of the Residence at 6928 N Hellman Avenue are recommended not eligible for inclusion on either register As such, the status code 6Z, "found ineligible for listing in the National Register through an evaluation process other than those mentioned in 6X (determination by NRHP Keeper) and 6Y (consensus between SHPO [State Historic Preservation Officer] and federal agency)" has been assigned to the Residence at 6928 N Hellman Avenue This evaluation was conducted under the supervision of SWCA's architectural historian, who (Sketch Map with north arrow required ) exceeds the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Professional See inset on attached Location Map Qualifications An evaluation process following the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Evaluation was employed including physical examination of the property, research at local and state archives, query of knowledgeable informants, and comparison to other properties determined eligible and worthy of preservation The architectural historian concluded that 1) the vernacular buildings and structures on the property do not embody distinctive characteristics or represent the works of a master (Criterion C), are not associated with significant events in local, state, regional, or national history (A), are not associated with persons significant in local, state, regional, or national history (B), and have no unique information to yield in local, state, regional, or national history (D) 811 Additional Resource Attributes HP2 Single family property (This space reserved for official comments ) DPR 5236 (1/95) A- 8 •612.References. Murphy, Robert, former resident, telephone interview 0 6/1 412 0 0 6 B13 Remarks none •614. Evaluator. Kevin Hunt/SWCA 'Date of Evaluation. 06/12/2006 (site visit) • 'Requved information Page 5 of 6 'Resource Name or # Residence at 6928 N Hellman Avenue •Recorded by Kewn Hunt. SWCA Environmental Consultants •Date Recorded June 12, 2006 ®Continuation ^ Update • A-10 DPR 523E (1/95) •Required information k es g ` Y. '' Pnrnary"#';> `?,.r` -'~ r;~.t'.k :;,,:~'~: -u a;~N . »~~;'` ,; . ~ ; ~ ... Stete~of~Celifo_mia,=,~The Resourc A cane ~y °" ' '~ `~ `~"~ r .DEPARTMENT+OFPARKS AND~RECREATION ~ -" ~' "'; HRI #~~"'' ," ~^~~ %~" `"*=" -*~':'ri':'~r~A'•;' :` ~ u A- CONTIN~AITIOI~YSHEETz;~~..,., ~-. ~;~~ ,~.:;k~. ~,,:._,r.~,=~.4.,f~;;=~~_ ,~,-,~ r~.~,;,.,a„':,~~.-. `.- ,- d ;Y;~y, a. `;iu:~=" i-.:~ ~,{. ,< r~ f*" v4;U :meta;..}~Jn.' ~r.`;M°'c,f, ~'~`~`i~*."..i. > ,,.yJ.. MSA,.i.1c s'..', .. v,- ~~. _~.~ ~::?: 5.~~~~' ith. i;ITrlnOmlal:.c: -C'c~''"_.5'o'.~~t~sn`: _ .,: ;..,<~ L•i.~r"5 _.. _ .. ?'' l.._a~a.-~ non „~, Page 6 of 6 'Resource Name or # Residence at 6928 N Hellman Avenue • `Recorded by Kevin Hunt, SWCA Environmental Consultants `Date Recorded June 12, 2006 ®Continuation ^ Update • • A-}1 DPR 523E (1/95) `Required information T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE• September 27, 2006 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY. Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01126 - FRANK AN - A request to develop a commercial center on 7 74 gross acres of land consisting of ten freestanding restaurant buildings and one retail building totaling 51,200 square feet within the Community Commercial Distnct (Subarea 4), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-221-03, 07, 22, 23, and 24 Related File Tentative Parcel Map • SUBTPM16767 BACKGROUND On November 9, 2005, "International Restaurant ~Ilage" was approved by the Plannmg Commission with a total of 10 freestanding restaurant buildings and 2 retail buildings totaling 51,200 square feet. The buildings were approved Hnth a unrfortn design, and overall international theme which included a large color palette and a main entry Hnth a Route 66 theme faGng Foothill Boulevard The approved master plan did not inGude any use of fast food/take out restaurants because of the lack of sufficient parking for those more intensive uses as stated in the ongmal staff report (Exhibit C) ANALYSIS A. General Since the ongmal approval, the applicant has met Hnth several tenants who are interested in a coffee shop and ice cream parlor specifically to locate in Building "C " This would allow 1,100 square feet for each tenant, totaling 2,200 square feet for the entire budding The applicant is also requesting a shrft in the bwlding floor plan of Buildings "K" and "L " Originally, both buildings were approved as sit-down restaurants, but the applicant has deeded that a retail shop would work better for Budding "L " The buildings have been shifted and now share an intenor wall and are structurally connected The parking has been modrfied to provide the additional three parking spaces required Because of the change rn use to retail rn Budding "L" (a less intense use than a restaurant), the entire site will only need three additional parking spaces B Desron Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on August 15, 2006 The protect was approved as presented • ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC200401128 (MOD) - FRANK AN September 27, 2006 Page 2 • C Environmental Assessment• Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Ad (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Decaration on November 9, 2005, in connection with the Cty's approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC200401128 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16767 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Decaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same protect unless. (i) substantial changes are proposed to the protect that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the ciroumstances under which the prated was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental rmpads, or (iii) new important information shows the protect will have new or mare severe rmpads than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts Staff has evaluated the Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2004-01128 and conGudes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the prated have not occurred which would create new or more severe rmpads than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration The protect mod cation includes a minor change of use, from asit- down restaurant use to a take-out restaurant use, and a building footpnnt modfcation which will not adversely impact the site Staff further finds that the protect will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant The revisions to the sde plan are very minor and do not effect the prated as a whole Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the • Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC200401128. cVRRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the prated site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve modification to Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01128 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Huth conditions Respectfully submitted, R-d~ ~ Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT ECUna Attachments Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Building Elevations Exhibit C - Design Review Comments dated August 15, 2006 Exhibit D - Letter from the Applicant dated May 9, 2006 • Exhibit E - Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 9, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01128 A- 2 • • I I C f s ~ " o liW U~8^~ ~~ ~r tl ~ -+ i -- L a ~~~~ 1 a ~~ ~~~ it Y r y .~~W7' ~ ~ ~ WIy id~5 j ~ i~~~a'4:% ;~ :_. :s ,-- - ~ - - -,~~ --, ~ - ~T- __ ._ ~~. ~,.n ~IyIrL I I ~~ ~ -f~, ~r ~T.. ~' E5G ~ ~_~ I~\ ~ ~Yti~/~ pI v l flyo xi ~I ,,,I ~~ ~' f' ;, ;~ ~; ~.I I~ ~ , i~, ~~~~+ A @§ [ ~ ~ ;37 a ~ ~- ~ sc I e; w~ J ` i ~q : I a ~ ~ ery ~ _ ~ ~a ~ z &j ~ ~_ ¢c7 ¢Zb fa 'yg I ~ ngy a ¢' ~ ~I ~3 ~w. ~ H F',J ;w• ~ ~ ~ ~.:y; A- 3 ~, ,a, - -,_ ~~ .~ __ -; , , t~gy; `~ ~ i , . P ~ J: Y V~I~ ~°~~v •vvv r D p • • o o ~~~.~~~ o ....~._,oW,~.>,.~ o .~A.a..~~... ® MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 8 e,~knv ® .u.neo.un ® w..o.e B ~'^°~^° 8 ~~ ®'~'^ 8 °""` 8 ~~ 8 °.°° B w 8 °°® 8 ~~ 8 8 ® COLOR DESCRIPTION • S ~ Q Q I ~ ! ~ i Q Q Q Q 4 4 Q Q Q ~ 4 4 Q Q Q Q Q Q b ~J`d-I~In1N`dafl`d1S3a~dN011`dN~~1Nl I~ ~ ~o=LL ~I~IIIIII k ~ ~~ ~ _ e o ~, ~~ ~ ~ z ~ v ~ J ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ ? ~ ~~ ~~ 5 ~ 4: ~ ® w N P ~ Q Q 4 Q o Q Q Zc m~ o~ m~ m~ • CONSENT CALENDAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Emily Cameron August 15, 2006 MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01128 - FRANK AN - A request to develop a commercial center on 7 74 gross acres of land, consisting of ten freestanding restaurant buildings and one retail budding totaling 51,200 square feet within the Community Commeraal District (Subarea 4), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-221-03, 07,22,23,24 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16767 Design Parameters The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on September 14, 2005, for all ten freestanding restaurant buildings and one retail bwlding, totaling 51,200 square feet Originally, the Conditional Use Permit allowed only sit-down restaurants and met the minimum regwrements for parking The applicant originally agreed not to provide any type of fast-food use because of the minimal parking provided Since the approval, the applicant has spoken to several tenants that would like to locate a retail shop on the east side of the project (Building L) The applicant is proposing to connect Budding K and L with one wall The applicant also has a tenant who would like to open an ice cream/coffee shop along Foothill Boulevard (Budding C,) which would require a modification to the Conditional Use Permit to allow afast-food type use in this building only The parking has been modified at a minimum to provide the additional three parking spaces regwred All other buildings are proposed as approved at the last Planning Commission hearing Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve issues Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wail discuss the following secondary design issues If any increase in square footage is added to any building/restaurant or retail shop, the project shall be brought back to the Design Review Committee/ Planning Commission for review and approval, subject to additional conditions Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion If the applicant plans to modify other shops or restaurants in this project, an additional modification to the ongmal Conditional Use Permd wdl be regwred ~(~~ brf- C A- 7 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2004-01128 - FRANK AN • August 15, 2006 Page 2 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee review the project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Emily Cameron The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented • A- 8 n Li CJ Planning Department 10500 Civic center Dnve. Rancho Cucamonga,CA91730 May 9,2006 Conditional use permrt# SUBT PM16767-DRC-01128 I will try to modify the condrt~onal use of the buildings C. K and L as follows First, The Budding C When I received the conditional use permit, this mternat~onal restaurant village did not have a coffee shop, a ice cream shop and a juice shop to begin with. In order to complete the center related with mternat~onal foods, we need to modify the conditional use from the restaurant to a fast food restaurant at the building C Second, The Budding K and L When I received the conditional use permit, we did not own the next land. Now we own the next land so we want to spread the restaurants from the area which has many restaurants to next land therefore we want to modify the conditional use from restaurant to retail shop at the budding L. Third, The Building K and L are merged because when the conditional use permit was issued from city, motorcycle parking lots and bicycle parking lots were not provided In order to provide these parking lots, we need to merge the bwldmg K and L Sincerely ~. ~/ ~.~ Frank An (f'~ v ` A- 9 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE November 9, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16767 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 7 74 gross acres of land into 10 lots within the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-221-03, 07, 22, 23, and 24 Related Files DRC2004-01128, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00450 (Continued from September 14, 2005) • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01128 -CHARLES JOSEPH AND ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a commeraal center on 7 74 gross acres of land, consisting of ten freestanding restaurant bwldmgs and one retail building totaling 51,200 square feet within the Community Commercial Distnct (Subarea 4), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-221-03, 07, 22, 23, 24 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map 16767 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00450 (Continued from September 14, 2005) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North - Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac) -Multi Family Residential South - General commeraal -Foothill Boulevard East - Community Commercial - Sammy's Liquor Store West - Community Commercial -Sacred Heart Church B General Plan Designations Project Site - Community Commercial North - Medium Residential South - General Commercial East - Community commeraal • West - Community commeraal ~XNl~1T ~ A-1o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC204-001128 AND SUBTT16767-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 9, 2005 Page 2 C Site Characteristics The project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, situated between Sacred Heart Church to the west and Sammy's Liquor Store to the east The site is relatively flat with sparse trees, which will be removed during grading D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvpe of Use Footage Ratio Reowred Provided Sit Down Restaurant 39,270 1/100 3g7 397 (no fast foodrtakcaout) Retail 12,000 5/1000 60 60 Total 457 457 ANALYSIS Backoround The protect was originally scheduled for Planning Commission approval September 14, 2005 The applicant requested an additional time extension of 60 days to review design options No revisions have been made, and the applicant would like to move forward with the protect at this time • General The project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, dust west of Sammy's Liquor store and east of Sacred Heart Church Existing multi-family apartments are to the north and Foothill Boulevard is to the south The property is relatvely flat with sparse trees, therefore, the applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit The applicant is proposing a 10-lot subdrvision, which will include 10 freestanding restaurant buildings with 2 retail buildings totaling 51,700 square feet The applicant is proposing a uniform design theme for all of the buildings, which includes stacked stone and stucco as the main materials tower elements, cornice trim, awnings, and a large color palette Route 66 features will be added on Foothill Boulevard to include low walls, a large fountain, trellis, and decorative concrete within the plaza areas and at all building entries The project also incorporates decorative drive aisles at Foothill Boulevard and nine flagpoles as part of the International Restaurant theme According to the applicant, all of the restaurants will be sit-down restaurants, no fast food or take out is allowed Because the parking meets only the minimum requirements, no outdoor seating or expansion of the restaurants will be allowed unless the applicant formally requests modifications, with the addition of parking to the site A Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, and Coleman) reviewed the project on August 2, 2005 The applicant agreed to minor modifications to the buildings and landscaping B Parcel Map The proposed Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16767 associated with the . project is to create 10 separate lots for the purpose of selling the buldings proposed on A-1 1 r __ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC204-001128 AND SUBTT16767-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES November 9, 2005 • Page 3 the property A reciprocal access agreement is regwred The applicant intends to maintain the property through a property management company C Tree Removal Permit. The applicant has submitted a request for the removal of 46 trees on site An Arborist Report was submitted (Jim Borer, January 29, 2005) No eucalyptus windrows exist on site Replacement of the trees is regwred at a 1 to 1 ratio, with minimum 15- gallon size trees The landscape palette will be consistent with surrounding development and include relocation of two Olroe trees on-site D Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that there could be significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality during the site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-signifcant level If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the pro/ect site No correspondence has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that • Parcel Map SUBTPM16767 and Conditional Us of the attached Resolutions of Approval and environmental impacts Respectfully submitted, Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC EC/Is the Planning Commission approve Tentative e Permit DRC2004-01128 through the adoption issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Attachments Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C - Conceptual Grading Exhibit D - Landscape Plan Exhibit E - Building Elevations Exhibit F - Initial Study Draft Resolution for Tentative Parcel Draft Resolution for Conditional Use • MapSUBTPM16767 Permit DRC2004-01128 A-12 RESOLUTION NO 06-86 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-001128 WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATLEY 600 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-221-03, 07, 22, 23, AND 24 A Recitals 1 Frank An filed an application for the issuance of a Modification to Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01128, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On November 9, 2005, "International Restaurant Village" was approved by the Planning Commission with a total of 10 freestanding restaurant buildings and 2 retail buildings totaling 51,200 square feet 3 On September27, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 4 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, PartA, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on September27, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to the property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, 600 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue v~nth a street frontage of 367 feet and lot depth of 597 feet, and is presently improved with curb and gutter, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is Multi-Family Residential, the propertyto the south consists of Foothill Boulevard, the property to the east is Community Commercial with a small liquor store, and the property to the west is Sacred Heart Church, c The application proposes the modification to the original Conditional Use Permit to allow fast food restaurant/take out tenants in Building "C", and a retail shop in Building "L" with a slight shrft in the floor plan, with no additional fast food/take out uses, and a modification of the parking lot to provide the additional three parking spaces required for fast food restaurant uses and, d The project, togethervnth the recommended conditions of approval, meets development • standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan A-13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-86 DRC2004-01128 (MOD) - FRANK AN September 27, 2006 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations r1 LJ a Pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 9, 2005, in connection Hnth the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01128 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16767 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration • is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless ()substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances underwhich the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts b The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC200401128 that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration The project modification includes a minor change of use, from a sit-down restaurant use to a take out restaurant use, and a building footprint modification which will not adversely impact the site Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level ofless-than-significant The revisions to the site plan are very minor and do not effect the project as a whole. c Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Modification of Condtional Use Permit DRC2004-01128 d Pursuant to the requirements of Califomia Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the • Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considenng the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The revisions to the site plan are very minorand A-14 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-86 DRC2004-01128 (MOD) - FRANK AN September 27, 2006 Page 3 • do not effect the project as a whole Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Calrfomia Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Tale 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5.) 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnno Department 1) No entertainment is approved by this permit Any entertainment, as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5 12, shall require a separate application and approval of an entertainment permit 2) Outdoor dining shall not be allowed unless approved by the Planning Commission by modification of this Conditional Use Pertnd, excepting thatthe Planning Director shall have authority to approve reductions in intenor floor areas to allow a like increase in outdoor dining area provided that the combined total indoor and outdoor restaurant floor area does not exceed 39,270 square feet Increasing the combined total indoor and outdoor restaurant floor area to greater than 39,270 square feet may be allowed if the developer submits a shared parking study prepared pursuant to Development Code Section 17.12 040 E. subject to approval by Planning Commission by modification of this Conditional Use Permit 3) Any additional modifications to the buildings will require a modification to the Conditional Use Permit, and shall be brought back to Planning Commission for rewew The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY, ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James Troyer, Secretary I, James Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of September 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS • NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS A-15 PROJECT #: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01128 SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO INTERNATIONAL RESTAURANT VILLAGE APPLICANT: FRANK AN NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATLEY 600 FEET WEST OF LOCATION: ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLYTO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements c°°'°leti°n oats 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Crty, its _/_/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, ds agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Cdy may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this conduion. 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-86, Standard _!_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mdigations shall be inGuded on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the constructioNgrading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1 Modification to Conditional Use Permit, Vanance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval _/_/_ shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 Occupancy ofthe faculties shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied wdh Pnor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct end the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 2 Approval ofthis request shall not waive compliance with ail sections of the Development Code, _/_! all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at • the time of bulldmg perms issuance sC-1-05 A-16 I ~PLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMM12008 Res 8 Stf RpFlDRC2004071285tdC°ntl 9-18 doc Planning Commission Meeting of C ' Z 7 ' y ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM ~~ ~-~~L4~ ~a i i ~ 1-~ ~~ S .A ~1Nt~ I~ ~'~ L~ ~'~9yyy~j .