The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007/10/17 - Agenda Packet,1~ 7u 10500 Civic Center Drive 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 15` and 3`d Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. OCTOBER 17, 2007 MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Diane Williams Rex Gutierrez L. Dennis Michael Sam Spagnolo CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Debra J. Adams, CMC ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC CUCAMCONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have alreadyexpressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications,' your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:Ilwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us ® If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, Please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 2007 A. 5:30 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM 1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Williams Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -STEVE KILMER V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA & STEVE TAYLOR; CASE NUMBER RCV 074142 -City/Fire 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 5495.9(A) - JR ENTERPRISES, LP V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -CASE NUMBER RCV 090728 -City 3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND I-15, PARCEL NUMBER 0227-131-54 AND -61, MOHSEN GHANEIAN AND JOE O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTIES, REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT -City E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 2007 2 h '~ ~ ~~°'"' ; G~~REGULAR 1VI"EETING `'~ L ~ ~ , ,~ r TO ORDER '= 7 00 P M ~ CAtiI , . . s x ~;COUNCIL~C~HtA+M~BERS ';:> x ` ~ ~ ~ I` ~~fiE ~n~c;~ '-' : n ,. ,~,r : .. , ._~ <,.. r ~~... 'r THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Williams Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo .,n~ Zr m,c yr -^,~P~aT x^t ~^3 'y v:lv. w ~un+.e.3-`~-. +s <;~< Q xt ®UNC~EM'EN TS/PPRESE~NTATIONS` ~ ~ ~H.~;.=AN?N `~ ~4' ;~ r , , , , ,~ 1. Presentation of "Founding the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga" by author and resident, Catherine Bridge. 2. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of the 10~" Anniversary of Anthony's Italian Kitchen. V i V A O S ~~~~ ' ' ~~Iw~ C r I 1VI~Ul IC TI N ~; ,.._;, ~ ~ , „~P~URBLICZ O;1 This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 2007 3 J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council to respond to comments made by the general public. K. CONSENT CALENDAR-REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: September 5, 2007 (Regular Meeting) September 10, 2007 (Special Meeting -Team Building Review - Kurth absent) October 3, 2007 (Special Meeting re Proposed Arrow Route Center - Michael absent) ~ 2. Approval of Check Register dated September 26 through October 9, 2007, for the total amount of $1,058,855.93. 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of September 30, 2007. 2 4. Approval of specifications for Epicenter Stadium Seat Replacement and Cross Aisle and 10 Seat Waterproofing" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from RDA Stadium Complex Capital Improvement Fund and RDA Tax Allocation Bond proceeds, and authorize the City Engineer to award a contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder and provide the Agency with a comprehensive bid summary at the November 7, 2007 meeting. 11 RESOLUTION NO. RA 07-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT AND CROSS AISLE AND SEAT WATERPROOFING" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to award and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 15 RA 07-019) in the amount of $800,000 to Dan Guerra and Associates, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $80,000 for the design of the pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail from Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue (Phases 4a and 4b), and the Vista Park along the north side of Foothill Boulevard east of Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, to be funded from Beautification Fees, Account No. 11103165650/1615110-0, Park Development Fees, Account Nos. 11203055650/1544120-0 and 1120305565011615120-0, and 2004 Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 26608015650/1189660-0; and appropriate an amount of $475,000 to Account No. 2660801565011189660-0 from 2004 Tax Allocation Bond Fund Balance. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ OCTOBER 17, 2007 4 6. Approval to award a Contract (CO RA 07-020) to Emcor Service for the "Animal Care Center Air Conditioning/Ventilation Upgrade" project in the amount of $1,495,450 and authorize the expenditure of a contingency in the amount of $225,000 funded from Account No. 2650801- 565011654650-0 and appropriate $1,720,450 into Account No. 2650801-5650/1654650-0. ~ 8 L. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. 7. Approval of Minutes: September 4, 2007 (Special Meeting for presentations) September 5, 2007 (Regular Meeting) September 10, 2007 (Special Meeting -Team Building Review - Kurth absent) 19 8. Approval of Check Register dated September 26 through October 9, 2007, for the total amount of $258,166.45. 9. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of September 30, 2007. 22 10. Approval to purchase two (2) Ford Escape Hybrids for the Fire District from Sunrise Ford of 26 Fontana, California, in the amount of $47,665, funded by Acct. No. 3289501-5604 (Capital Outlay -Vehicles), as approved in the adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget. 11. Approval to adopt a boundary map showing parcel numbers 0209-151-27 & 37 (CalEast 30 Phelan 8`h and Vineyard, LLC), located on the south side of 8`h St., west of Hellman Avenue, to be annexed into CFD No. 85-1. 32 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 07-8) SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 12. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 34 07-8 (APN: 0209-151-27 & 37; CalEast Phelan 8`" & Vineyard, LLC), into Community Facilities District No. 85-1, specifying facilities and services provided, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the annexation and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ OCTOBER 17, 2007 5 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-055 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 07-8) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 13. Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities 45 District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 07-7 (Alder creek, LLC - SUBTT17769) RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-056 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 07-7 14. Approval to award a Contract (CO FD 07-014 / CO 07-194) for the purchase of gasoline and 49 diesel fuel from Southern Counties Oil Co., LTD (SC Fuels) for Fleet Maintenance, Police Department and Fire District through a competitive bid process, in annual amounts as per adopted budget, fund by Acct. Nos. 1001317-5255 (Fleet), 1001317-5256 (Fleet), 1001701- 5255 (Police Department), 3281527-5255 (Fire District), and 3281527-5256 (Fire District), and approval for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2007/08, with an option to renew upon mutual consent for additional one (1) year periods up to a total of three (3) years. M. CONSENT CALENDAR- CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. 15. Approval of Minutes: September 4, 2007 (Special Meeting for presentations) September 5, 2007 (Regular Meeting) September 10, 2007 (Special Meeting -Team Building Review - Kurth absent) October 3, 2007 (Special Meeting re Proposed Arrow Route Center - Michael absent) 16. Approval of Check Register dated September 26 through October 9, 2007, and payroll 50 ending October 9, 2007, for the total amount of $7,054,865.21. 17. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of September 30, 2007. 78 18. Approval of the Community Services Department Update. 90 A R GENCY, EDEVELOPMENT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 19. Approval to purchase eleven (11) Ford Escape Hybrid vehicles from Sunrise Ford of 98 Fontana, California, through a competitive bid process, in the amount of $282,574, funded as follows: Ten (10) vehicles in the amount of $256,886 funded by Acct. No. 1712001-5604 (Vehicle Replacement Fund) and one (1) vehicle in the amount of $25,688 funded by Acct. No. 1139303-5604 (LMD 9), as approved in the adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget. 20. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the EtiwandalSan Sevaine Area Master Plan for 100 fiscal year 2006/2007 and appropriation of $111,024.00 to Account No. 1116303- 5650/1026116-0. 21. Approval to amend the Contract to R.J. Noble Company (CO 07-041) in the amount of 101 $130,000.00 for the Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets, and appropriate $80,000.00 to Acct. No. 1190303-5650/1022190-0 from Prop 42 Traf£c Relief Fund Balance. 22. Approval to award a Contract (CO 07-194 / FD 07-014) for the purchase of gasoline and 103 diesel fuel from Southern Counties Oil Co., LTD (SC Fuels) for Fleet Maintenance, Police Department and Fire District through a competitive bid process, in annual amounts as per adopted budget, fund by Acct. Nos. 1001317-5255 (Fleet), 1001317-5256 (Fleet), 1001701- 5255 (Police Department), 3281527-5255 (Fire District), and 3281527-5256 (Fire District), and approval for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2007/08, with an option to renew upon mutual consent for additional one (1) year periods up to a total of three (3) years. 23 . Approval to award and authorize the execution of a Contract (CO 07-193) between the City 104 of Rancho Cucamonga and Moosepoint Technology, Inc. for Geosmart Software Applications to be utilized on the City's Intranet and Internet in the amount of $55,330.00 funded by Account No. 1714001-5152. 24 . Approval to award and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 131 07-195 / RA 07-019) in the amount of $800,000 to Dan Guerra and Associates, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $80,000 for the design of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail from Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue (Phases 4a and 4b), and the Vista Park along the north side of Foothill Boulevard east of Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, to be funded from Beautification Fees, Account No. 11103165650/1615110-0, Park Development Fees, Account Nos. 11203055650/1544120-0 and 1 1 2030 5565011 61 51 2 0-0, and 2004 Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 26608015650/1189660-0; and appropriate an amount of $475,000 to Account No. 26608015650/1189660-0 from 2004 Tax Allocation Bond Fund Balance. 25 . Approval of an amendment to Joint Community Facilities Agreement (CO 04-172) by and 134 among the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Etiwanda School District and Rancho 2004, LLC and relates to the formation of the Henderson Creek Public Facilities Community Facilities District No. 2004-2 of the Etiwanda School District. 138 26 . Approval to accept the Rancho Crossing 12 KV Electrical Distribution System, Cabling, Connections and Equipment Project, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the I-15 Freeway, Contract No. 07-017, accept the project as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, approve contract change order in the amount of $48,956.02, approve the final contract amount of $126,774.57 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $41,174.17 to Acct. No. 1705303-5650/1397705-0 from Municipal Utility Fund Balance. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~ _ OCTOBER 17, 2007 RESOLUTION NO. 07-240 141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE RANCHO CROSSING 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, CABLING, CONNECTIONS AND EQUIPMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07- 017, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 27. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC 2003-00719, located on the 142 Northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, submitted by Pacific Globe, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 07-241 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-00719 28. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16882, located on the North side of 146 Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Lewis Investment Company, LLC. 149 RESOLUTION NO. 07-242 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16882 150 29. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2002-00322, located at Whirlaway and Tolstoy Ranch Road, submitted by Jesse Ash. RESOLUTION NO. 07-243 153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00322 154 30. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract Nos. 17487 and 17840, located South of Church Street and East of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Shea Homes, LP RESOLUTION NO. 07-244 157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT NOS. 17487 AND 17840 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ OCTOBER 17, 2007 8 31. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16311, located at the Southeast 158 corner of Hellman Avenue and 6`" Street, submitted by Crestwood Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 07-245 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16311 32. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2004-01244, located at the 162 Northeast corner of Civic Center Drive and Red Oak Drive, submitted by Abundant Living Family Church. RESOLUTION NO. 07-246 165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2004-01244 33. Approval to accept the Almond Box Culvert east of Hermosa, Contract No. 07-076, as 166 complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $272,920.00. 169 RESOLUTION NO. 07-247 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ALMOND BOX CULVERT EAST OF HERMOSA, CONTRACT NO. 07-076, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 34. Approval to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit for DRC2003-00213, located on the East 170 side of Milliken Avenue, north of 4`" Street, submitted by Fairmont Hospitality. 35. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 6205455, which was held on October 172 4, 2006, as a Maintenance Bond in the amount of $1,091,488.00 for the Base Line Road Traffic Signal Interconnect, Contract No. 03-078. 36. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a 174 Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16466, located north of Banyan Street between Etiwanda and Bluegrass Avenues, submitted by Carriage Estates, III, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 07-248 176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16466 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ OCTOBER 17, 2007 9 N. CONSENT ORDINANCES The followmg Ordinances have had public heanngs at the time of first reading Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial The Agency, Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion The City Clerk will read the title Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or Councilmember 1 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS - RABIES VACCINATION INFORMATION AND THE USE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION ORDINANCE RELATING TO BARKING DOGS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS ORDINANCE NO 782 (second reading) ~ 77 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REFERENCES IN PROVISIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ANIMALS WHICH HABITUALLY MAKE NOISE, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS, AND RABIES VACCINATIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE O. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1 APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT WITH REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEM INC (CO 07-196) 185 FOR AN AUTOMATED PHOTO RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM WITH REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEM, INC AT SELECTED INTERSECTIONS. IN THE AMOUNT OF $286.560 PER YEAR FUNDED BY ACCT NO 1001001-5314 FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2) YEARS, WITH TWO (2) ONE (1) YEAR RENEWAL OPTIONS AT CITY'S DISCRETION P. COUNCIL BUSINESS The followmg items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 1 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Counalmember ) 2 PRESENTATION BY GARY LACY ENTITLED "DEFINING THE APPROPRIATE ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESOURCES" REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 2007 10 3. DISCUSSION OF PERMIT PARKING REGULATIONS -Gutierrez 189 4. DISCUSSIONICONSIDERATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA RESOLUTION -Gutierrez 197 (Oral) RESOLUTION NO. 07-249 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE GOVERNOR, LEGISLATURE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO JOIN THE CITY IN ADVOCATING THE REVISION OF PROPOSITION 215 TO MINIMIZE THE ABUSE OF MARIJUANA Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING R. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 11, 2007, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. September 4, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Tuesday, September 4, 2007, in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Kurth called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Present were Councilmembers/Boardmembers: Rex Gutierrez; L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, and Mayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Assistant Library Director; Renee Tobin, Principal Librarian; Michelle Perera, Library Services Manager; Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director; Barbara Hansen, Community Program Coordinator; Chief Peter Bryan, Fire Protection District; Kelley Donaldson, Public Education Specialist, Fire Protection District; Chief Joe Cusimano, Police Department; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst III; Jose Ramirez, Information Services Specialist I; Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk; and Kathryn L. Scott, Assistant City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation by Library Staff regarding "Bridging the Learning Gap from Summer Reading Program to Live Homework Help." Deborah Clark, Library Director, presented a brief report, and Renee Tobin, Principal Librarian, presented the power point presentation. 2. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to Schools that Participated in Telethon 2007. Deborah Clark, Library Director, and Renee Tobin, Principal Librarian, along with Library Boardmembers Teresa Akahoshi, Amber Claflin and Rebecca Davies presented the Certificates to the school committee members representing the following supporting schools: Banyan Elementary, Caryn Elementary, Cecilia Lucero Solorio Elementary, Deer Canyon Elementary, Floyd M. Stork Elementary, Heritage Intermediate, Jasper Elementary, John L. Golden Elementary, Carlton P. Lightfoot Elementary, Terra Vista Elementary, Victoria Groves Elementary, Vineyard Jr. High and West Heritage Elementary. 3. Acceptance of a Donation from Costco to partially fund Public Education Program and Presentation by the Board of Directors to Costco. Fire Chief Peter Bryan, introduced Kelley Donaldson, Public Education Specialist, and stated this is an opportunity for the Board of Directors to compliment and thank a Chamber of Commerce business community member, Costco, who is partnering with the Fire District on a public education program. Kelley Donaldson announced the new training card program that will have a game aspect to it, having twelve different characters. She said the program kick off Open House is scheduled for October 13, 2007, and they are relying on the business community for help with sponsorships to get the program up and running. She said they are grateful to COSTO for their contribution. Special City Council/Fire Protection District Meeting September 4, 2007 Page 2 Joe Schumacher, Marketing Manager for Costco, presented a $250 check to the Fire Board of Directors to partially fund the Public Education Program. Mayor/President Kurth and Councilmembers/Boardmembers presented a Certificate of Recognition to Mr. Schumacher on behalf of Costco Wholesale in appreciation for the partnership with the Fire District for an innovative public education program and support of the Rancho Cucamonga community. Mr. Schumacher stated it's a pleasure and a great opportunity to help out the community and commented there is more money coming. He encouraged other businesses to participate in the program. 4. Presentation of the proceeds from the "Bark in the Park" events to the Animal Care and Services Department by the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes. Barbara Hansen, Community Program Coordinator, Animal Care & Adoption Center, along with Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director, thanked Quakes staff Jerry McKearney, Executive Vice President/General Manager, Rachel Barker, Ticket Manager, Katie Homayoun, Community Relations Manager, for helping promote and participate in the "Bark in the Park" program. Jerry McKearney, Executive Vice President/General Manager, stated the Quakes organization is happy to be a part of this event. He presented a $1,007 check to the Fire Board of Directors for the Animal Care Adoption Center and stated they look forward to the 2008 events. Mayor/President Kurth stated they are thrilled with the partnership that the City has with the Quakes organization and appreciate their support. Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director, introduced Zaba, a 4-year old, long-haired Chihuahua from the Animal Care Center. He said "Bark in the Park" is a unique event in which you and your pet companion can enjoy the game together. He thanked the Quakes for their support. 5. Presentation of Proclamations and Certificates of Recognition to three Little and Major League Division All Star teams for winning the District 71 Championships in Rancho Cucamonga. Doug Morris, Little League District 71 Administrator, assisted the Mayor and the Councilmembers in the presentation of Proclamations and Certificates of Recognition to the All Star teams. Mr. Morris stated there are ten teams, five from Rancho Cucamonga and five from Fontana. He thanked the Mayor/President and the City Councilmembers/Boardmembers for their support and presented District 71 pins to them. Mr. Morris presented a Certificate of Recognition to the following teams: Alta Loma Little League, Junior Division (13 & 14 year olds); Vineyard Little League, Major Division (11 & 12 year olds); and Alta Loma Little League (9 & 10 year olds). C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications from the public. Special City Council/Fire Protection District Meeting September 4, 2007 Page 3 D. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION REGIONAL FACULTY MEMBER POSITION APPOINTMENT OF JOSH STAPLETON -Oral Report Fire Chief Peter Bryan presented the staff report in recognition of a community member. He said the American Heart Association has appointed John Stapleton to be a regional faculty member. He said a regional faculty member is part of the American Heart Association and allows the City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide and maintain high quality training to the public as well as its public safety members. It allows the Fire District to provide advanced cardiac life support and pediatric advanced life support training to the community as well as to all public safety and allows the City to stay updated on the latest and greatest science and information coming from the American Heart Association. He said it is privilege and honor to introduce our representative John Stapleton. E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn L. Scott, CMC Assistant City Clerk September 5, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, September 5, 2007, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Williams, and Mayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; and John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S Mayor Kurth announced the closed session items: B1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No one was present to comment on the special closed session items. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:30 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS F. RECESS The closed session adjourned at 6:50 p.m. with no action taken. .,,,._ Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 2 G. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council was held on Wednesday, September 5, 2007, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Diane Williams called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, and Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, Legal Counsel/City Attorney; Mike Nelson, Economic Development Manager; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst III; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Services Analyst; Jose Ramirez Information Services Specialist I; Sid Siphomsay, Information Services Analyst I; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; James Troyer, Planning Director; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Joe Pulcinella, Animal Care 8 Services Director; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Daniel Schneider, Community Services Supervisor; JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Supervisor; Joe Duguay II, Community Services Coordinator; Captain Joe Cusimano, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Deputy Chief Mike Bell, Deputy Chief Mark Hartwig, Captain Cheryl Roberts, and Pam Pane, Management Analyst II, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk; and Kathryn L.. Scott, Assistant City Clerk. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Recognition of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation for their dedication and service Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, introduced each Boardmember. He provided background information about the Foundation, the joining of forces with the Library Foundation, and elaborated on their many accomplishments. He said they are currently working on the leadership of the Library Foundation and the Community Foundation to develop a future strategy and future strategic work plan for the future of the PAL (Promoting Arts and Literacy) Campaign. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Kurth stated thanked the Boardmembers for their many years of contributing and encouraging others to contribute and participate in our city. The Chairman/PresidenUMayor and Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers presented a City pin to each Foundation Boardmember. H2. Presentation and update on the Northtown Community Services Department Partnership Programs. JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Supervisor, presented the power point update with the assistance of Joe Duguay, II, Community Services Coordinator. Mrs. Gwynn introduced Nacho Gracia, Executive Director, Northtown Housing Development Corporation, and Mary Rocha, Social Services Director. She thanked them for their generous help and support. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Kurth commented on the participation numbers that have exceeded expectations for the programs and thanked staff for all their work. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 3 Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Michael said this is an example about the private/public partnerships that the City has with Northtown and other organizations. He said it certainly demonstrates the rapid increase in recreational and sports programs in our City. Nacho Gracia, Executive Director, Northtown Housing Development Corporation, stated nothing would have happened without the cooperation of staff in the City. He wanted the parents of the children of Northtown to know that there is always a place for their children to go where they are safe. He also thanked Mary Rocha, Social Services Director. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Spagnolo commented he has known Nacho Gracia for years and was proud of his positive image and accomplishments in Northtown. He thanked him for the excellent job. Vice Chairman/Vice President/Mayor Pro Tem Williams agreed with the previous comments. She thanked Mr. Gracia for his foresight in organizing the Northtown Community as a prideful place to live and for engaging the residents. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Gary Lacy spoke regarding CHECK (Citizens Helping Empower Citizens Through Knowledge) and requested to be placed on the City Council agenda to reveal details of the Executive Summary. 12. Raymond Breaux spoke regarding his volunteering at the re-resource library at the James L. Brulte Senior Center; he praised the facility and thanked Council for sharing their respective experiences/educational resources for the benefit of the wonderful City of Rancho Cucamonga. 13. John Lyons spoke regarding the recently drive-by, precision shooting in his neighborhood; he responded to comments made by Gary Lacy, and he said that the City's Fire Department is first class. 14. Jerie Lee thanked the Council on behalf of the senior for making the wellness pass center expansion a reality, as an additional 500 square feet has made a huge difference. I5. John Wood thanked Council and the Sheriff's Department for efforts in making his neighborhood safe again (Vintage Highlands). 16. Jim Moffatt stressed the important of education and said it was commendable that the Mayor is going to Harvard. 17. Tony Mize spoke regarding the $1 Million Luxury Lifestyle Package House Raffle (PAL Campaign). J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Chairman/President/Mayor Kurth thanked Vice ChairmanNice President/Mayor Pro Tem Williams, Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers and staff, for filling in during his absence. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 4 K. CONSENT CALENDAR- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY K1. Approval of Minutes: August 1, 2007 (regular meeting -Kurth absent) August 15, 2007 (regular meeting -Kurth absent) REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY CHAIRMAN KURTH K2. Approval of Check Register dated August 8 through August 28, 2007, for the total amount of $2,360,883.60. K3. Approval of a Resolution to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Haven Avenue Underpass Capital Proiect to be funded from Tax Allocation Bond proceeds and Transportation Funds. RESOLUTION NO. RA 07-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE UNDERPASS CAPITAL PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS K4. Approval to set a special meeting of the Redevelopment Agency on October 17, 2007, at 4:30 p.m. to consider a recommendation of the Relocation Appeals Board decision in a matter of a relocation assistance appeal. K5. Approval to an amendment to extend the Redevelopment Agency's contract with Hill & Knowlton, Inc. (RA 04-023) for public relations services for FY 2007-08 and authorization to renew the contract on an annual basis as needed. K6. Approval of architectural services agreements, expenditure authorizations and budget appropriations for designated projects as detailed below: REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY VICE CHAIRMAN WILLIAMS Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RJM Design Group (CO 07-167) for architectural services for Phase II of the Central Park Project in the amount of $2,498,865.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $249,887.00, funded from Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1343120-0, and approval of an appropriation of $2,748,752.00 from Park Development Fund to Acct. No. 1120305- 5650/1343120-0; Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group (RA 07-012) for architectural services for Fire Station 178 in the amount of $528,686.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $52,869.00, funded from Acct. No. 2505801-5650/1645505-6311, and approval of a transfer of $581,555.00 from Fire Bond Reserves in Acct. No. 2660801-9505 to Acct. No. 2505000-8660 and an appropriation of $581,555.00 to Acct. No. 2505801-5650/1645505-6311; Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group (FD 07-012) for architectural services for Fire Station 177 in the amount of $385,515.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $38,552.00, funded from Acct. No. 3281517-5650/1597281-6311, and approval of an appropriation of $424,067.00 from Fire Capital Reserves to Acct. No. 3281517-5650/1597281-6311. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 5 MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar except for Items No. 1 and No. 6. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM K1. Mayor Kurth said as he was absent during the regular meetings of August 1 and August 15, 2007, he would be abstaining from approving the minutes. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael, to approve Item K1. Motion carried unanimously, 4- 0-0-1 (Kurth abstained). DISCUSSION OF ITEM K6. Mayor ProTem asked that due to this item also being the same item on the Fire District Agenda (No. L9) and the City Council agenda (No. M17), she would like the discussion to be heard at one time. Discussion on this item follows the City Council Consent Calendar. L. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT L7. Approval of Minutes: August 1, 2007 (regular meeting -Kurth absent) August 15, 2007 (regular meeting -Kurth absent) REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY PRESIDENT KURTH L8. Approval of Check Register dated August 8 through August 28, 2007, for the total amount of $108,983.40. L9. Approval of architectural services agreements, expenditure authorizations and budget appropriations for designated projects as detailed below: REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY VICE PRESIDENT WILLIAMS Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RJM Design Group (CO 07-167) for architectural services for Phase II of the Central Park Project in the amount of $2,498,865.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $249,887.00, funded from Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1343120-0, and approval of an appropriation of $2,748,752.00 from Park Development Fund to Acct. No. 1120305- 5650/1343120-0; Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group (RA 07-012) for architectural services for Fire Station 178 in the amount of $528,686.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $52,869.00, funded from Acct. No. 2505801-5650/1645505-6311, and approval of a transfer of $581,555.00 from Fire Bond Reserves in Acct. No. 2660801-9505 to Acct. No. 2505000-8660 and an appropriation of $581,555.00 to Acct. No. 2505801-5650/1645505-6311; Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group (FD 07-012) far architectural services for Fire Station 177 in the amount of $385,515.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $38,552.00, funded from Acct. No. 3281517-5650/1597281-6311, and approval of an appropriation of $424,067.00 from Fire Capital Reserves to Acct. No. 3281517-5650/1597281-6311. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Michael to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar except for except for Items No. 7 and No. 9. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM L7. Mayor Kurth said as he was absent during the regular meetings of August 1 and August 15, 2007, he would be abstaining from approving the minutes. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 6 MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to approve Item L7. Motion carried unanimously, 4- 0-0-1 (Kurth abstained). DISCUSSION OF ITEM L9. Mayor ProTem asked that due to this item also being the same item on the Redevelopment Agenda (No. K6) and the City Council agenda (No. M17), she would like the discussion to be heard at one time. Discussion on this item follows the City Council Consent Calendar. M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL M10. Approval of Minutes: August 1, 2007 (regular meeting - Kurth absent) August 15, 2007 (regular meeting -Kurth absent) REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR KURTH M11. Approval of Check Register dated August 8 through August 28, 2007, and payroll ending August 28, 2007, for the total amount of $10,823,060.73. M12. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Construction of the Archibald Avenue Community Trail from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue, to be funded from Acct. No. 1110303-5650/1607110 (Beautification). RESOLUTION NO. 07-208 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ARCHIBALD AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM BANYAN STREET TO WILSON AVENUE TO BE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M13. Approval of a Resolution to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Haven Avenue Underpass Capital Project, to be funded from Tax Allocation Bond proceeds and Transportation Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 07-209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE UDNERPASS CAPITAL PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M14. Approval of a request from American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) Regional 65 for a Waiver of Fees and Charges for use of the soccer fields at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Adult Sports Complex on September 8, 2007, for their picture day. M15. Approval of a Resolution permitting Mayor Kurth to have been absent from the regular council meetings of June 6, 2007, June 20, 2007 and July 18, 2007. RESOLUTION NO. 07-210 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PERMITTING MAYOR KURTH TO HAVE Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 7 BEEN ABSENT FROM THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS OF JUNE 6, 2007, JUNE 20, 2007 AND JULY 18, 2007 M16. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for DRC2007-00159 located at 7201 Amethyst Street, submitted by Robert Bathish, owner. APN: 0202-161-04 RESOLUTION NO. 07-211 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2007-00159 M17. Approval of architectural services agreements, expenditure authorizations and budget appropriations for designated projects as detailed below: REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WILLIAMS Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RJM Design Group (CO 07-167) for architectural services for Phase II of the Central Park Project in the amount of $2,498,865.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $249,887.00, funded from Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1343120-0, and approval of an appropriation of $2,748,752.00 from Park Development Fund to Acct. No. 1120305- 5650/1343120-0; Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group (RA 07-012) for architectural services for Fire Station 178 in the amount of $528,686.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $52,869.00, funded from Acct. No. 2505801-5650/1645505-6311, and approval of a transfer of $581,555.00 from Fire Bond Reserves in Acct. No. 2660801-9505 to Acct. No. 2505000-8660 and an appropriation of $581,555.00 to Acct. No. 2505801-5650/1645505-6311; Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group (FD 07-012) for architectural services for Fire Station 177 in the amount of $385,515.00, authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $38,552.00, funded from Acct. No. 3281517-5650/1597281-6311, and approval of an appropriation of $424,067.00 from Fire Capital Reserves to Acct. No. 3281517-5650/1597281-6311. M18. Approval to award an annual contract to Ellis Enterprises of Los Alamitos (CO 07-168) for window cleaning services for various city facilities as per RFB#06/07-014, with the initial contract period covering from the effective date of contract through June 30, 2008, with the option to renew for an additional three (3) years in one (1) year increments upon mutual consent by the City Engineer and contractor, in an annual amount of $81,720 plus $10,000 extra work, with the opportunity for cost-of-living increases as specified in CO#07-124, to be funded from 1001312-5304. M19. Approval to total vendor expenditures for the purchase of fertilizers from Simplot Partners in the amount not to exceed $100,000 for Fiscal Year 2007/08, with an option to renew, upon mutual consent, for additional one-year periods, up to a total of three years, to be funded from various maintenance accounts as determined by staff. M20. Approval of a Mills Act Agreement (CO 07-169), DRC2007-00432 -John Degraffenreid, to reduce property tax for the Miners House, a historic landmark located at 10089 Eagle Ridge Court. The house was relocated from 10089 Base Line Road. -APN: 1077-041-71. Related files: Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, Landmark Designation LD87-26, Landmark Alteration Permit LAP88- 02, Conditional Use Permit CUP87-24, Parcel Map PM11311, Development Review DRC2003-00358, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 07-212 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MILLS ACT CONTRACT NO. CO 07-169 FOR THE HISTORIC PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 10089 EAGLE RIDGE COURT. APN: 1077-041-71 M21. Approval and execution of an agreement between the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (CO 07-170) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Cucamonga Storm Drain from Cucamonga Channel to Archibald Avenue. M22. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2004-00656, located on the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Rochester Court, submitted by Mangini Development. RESOLUTION NO. 07-213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-00656 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M23. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16306, located on the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive, submitted by Young California Cucamonga, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 07-214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16306 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M24. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC2001-00437, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, submitted by Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation. M25. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond retained in lieu of a Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR00-40, located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue, submitted by Arrow & Utica Partners, LLC. M26. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2001-00772, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Hillside Road, submitted by Prestige Homes, L.P. M27. Approval to accept the Improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00018, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Alta Loma Drive, submitted by Panorama Development, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 07-215 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00018 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M28. Approval to release Maintenance Letter of Credit for DRC2004-00428, located on the south side of 8`h Street, east of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Oakmont Rancho 8th Street, LLC. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 9 M29. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DC2004-00721, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 7`" Street, submitted by Fairway Business Centre, LLC & Milliken/Greystone Properties, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 07-216 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-00721 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M30. Approval to accept the Improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2006-00284, located at the northwest corner of 19`" Street and Carnelian Street, submitted by Rancho Plaza, a General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 07-217 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2006-00284 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M31. Ap~roval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 16300, located on the north side of 4 h Street between Pittsburgh Avenue and Richmond Place, submitted by Tharaldson Development Co. M32. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 16539, located at 6`" Street and Santa Anita Avenue, submitted by La-Santa Anita, LLC. M33. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16899, located on the south side of Ninth Street, west of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Cecil R. Carney & Cathy A. Carney, husband and wife, as joint tenants, as to undivided 50% interest and Shucri I. Yaghi, a married man, as his sole and separate property, as to an undivided 50% interest. RESOLUTION NO. 07-218 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16899 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M34. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for Parcel Map 17063, located at 9359 Feron Boulevard, east of Hellman Avenue, submitted by WF Construction, Inc. M35. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Orphan Flow Improvements (Tract 14759), located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes. M36. Approval to accept the Rancho Summit Park Project from Pulte Homes as complete (Tract 14759-2), authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept the Maintenance Bond, and record the Grant Deed for the property. RESOLUTION NO. 07-219 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 10 IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO SUMMIT PARK, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M37. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16147, located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc. M38. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16466 (Storm Drain Improvements), located north of Banyan Street between Etiwanda and Bluegrass Avenues, submitted by Carriage Estates III, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 07-220 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16466 (STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M39. Approval to accept the Archibald Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Banyan Street to Hillside Road and Wilson Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 07-035 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $520,328.32. RESOLUTION NO. 07-221 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BANYAN STREET TO HILLSIDE ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 07-035 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar except for except for Items No. 10 and No. 17. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM M1. Mayor Kurth said as he was absent during the regular meetings of August 1 and August 15, 2007, he would be abstaining from approving the minutes. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to approve Item M10. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-0-1 (Kurth abstained). DISCUSSION OF ITEM K6, L9 & M17. Approval of architectural services agreements, expenditure authorization and budget appropriations for designated projects as described. Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Williams stated as a general rule, she does not like it when staff groups things together. She said there are all kinds of stuff being thrown in this and she would like to have it broken out and each component discussed very thoroughly. She said she is uncomfortable with this item because she doesn't feel she has near enough information, especially on the second two. She would like to have them brought back at another time. Vice ChairmanNice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Williams said she would like to have the fire stations named instead of referred to as numbers, as the general public does not know buildings by numbers. She also stated that she is not sure that we have decided for certain that Central Park is the right location Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 11 for a fire station and she would like to have some honest discussion about it, possibly in a workshop forum. She said she is real comfortable with approving the professional services agreements, but the other two subjects she felt have not really been discussed. She said they are mentioned in the prior strategic plan, which was approved, but maybe Council should not have approved it, because that was the beginning of something bigger; she thought there would be a lot more explanation, a lot more clarity given. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that the architectural contracts are enter twined because there is coordinating work with different architects. He said one architect specializes in park design and the other in fire station design, and there are some costs savings involved. He said if there are any changes, the contracts will need to be renegotiated. Vice Chairman/Vice President/Mayor Pro Tem Williams said then maybe that is what we have to do. She said she is not comfortable and she stated this at the workshop. She said her mind is set that she does not think Central Park is a good place for a fire station. She said she apologizes if she missed it and was not paying attention, but, if anything, she was under the impression that a fire station at Central Park was going to be a small, very utilitarian facility to service the traffic collisions in that area. She said she has asked for more information about the kind of calls that are needed around there, but she has never gotten it in a simple form that she can understand. She said we haven't tried the system of prioritizing calls, which could change everything, yet we are already assuming that we are going to need certain levels of service. She said those are the kinds of things that should be discussed at a very detailed workshop. She said we really need to look at where else we could put that fire station. Agencymember/BoardmemberCouncilmember Gutierrez said there is always new information coming, always things to rethink, strategies, how to maximize our resources, and how to save money. He said we all know that we have a first class fire department, but to say we don't want to examine how we can save money and do things better, and then say that we're picking on them if we are recommending something, that is really irresponsible. He said there are a lot of issues that he is not sure about-the need and the size of the station and the location. He said the idea of a fire station at Heritage Park changed because the residents wanted that park to be for recreation. He said that same philosophy might prevail at Central Park. He said we're just concerned about using our money in the best possible way we can and conserving as much space as we can in this last great park in our City. He said he wished that we could proceed with the aquatic development aspect, but, on the rest, meet further to discuss details. Jack Lam, City Manager, said we do not recommend approving any of these contracts, because if we pull them apart, we need to renegotiate those because the dollar amounts will be different. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Michael said he respects his colleagues and their opinions; however he is a little astonished, as the Council has had workshops and they have unanimously approved a strategic plan. He said in all fairness to our Mayor, he was not in attendance in February 2006 when the strategic plan was approved. He said the Council made a determination and held workshops and public meetings dealing with Station No. 7, and we moved it out of a park and spent quite a few extra thousands, possibly millions, of dollars in order to do that to satisfy the equestrian concerns with the fire station in an equestrian park. He said he is all for looking at other potential opportunities. He said he couldn't approve the design for Central Park without knowing where a fire station is going to be. He said he believes we do need the fire station, regardless of the response system that's developed. He said he would welcome a workshop if that's what needs to be done. He said he would like to see this go forward with a unanimous vote of the Council because he wants to "walk the walk" and make public safety this City's number one priority, and he wants to make our recreational environment a number one priority. He said he thinks there are some definite advantages to a fire station at the park, one being conserving tax payer dollars. He said his fear is that there is not much other land that would make sense for a strategically located fire station, and he is afraid that if we abandon that idea, and we don't have a willing land owner, we may end up having the potential of a public taking of private property. He said Central Park property was deeded to the City for a park, and he thinks there are some advantages of it; however, he would certainly support further dialogue, further investigation and further comfort levels. He said he is not in favor of moving forward and starting to peace meal approvals; he came prepared tonight Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 12 to vote for the consent calendar item. He said, however, if there is consternation about that, then we can have different forums for full dialogue and opportunity for people to speak. He said he is willing to work with all of City Council. Vice Chairman/Vice President/Mayor Pro Tem Williams said she thinks it is an opportunity in public to clear the air and make sure that it goes forward in a way that is absolutely studied to everyone's comfort level. She said at no time is she inferring that that our fire department is not first class. She said she wants to make sure that we are able to service our whole community in the best way possible. She said we get criticism from our community when they see three and four trucks going to something that very clearly could have been prioritized as a patient who fell out of bed at a senior center; then you've got every piece of equipment out of service; whereas, if we had the new call centers working and the prioritization occurring, the proper piece would have gone and taken care of the situation; then the other equipment is where it needs to be, ready to go out on another call. She said she has asked several times to have more discussion, but it's just breezed over. She said this is her opportunity to be heard and she cannot vote for it until there is further discussion. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Spagnolo said we've gone over this for the last couple years, but there's still some questions regarding our level of service in the community. He said he agrees with Councilmember Michael. He said it's not a new idea to have a fire station in a park; it's probably one of the ideal areas to put a fire station. He said if we are going to look at lowering our standards on what we've adopted and not put in Station 8, and maybe not put in Station 7, we need to look at changing our strategic plan and adopting a lesser standard of service than what we are currently providing to the community. His suggestion is to bring back the strategic plan and massage it until satisfies the people on this Council. Vice Chair/Vice President/Mayor Pro Tem asked that we call the fire stations by a name as opposed to numbers, so people can relate to an actual location. She said she doesn't think at any time, since we've found the new site for Station No. 7, has anyone mentioned not doing it. Fire Chief Bryan addressed the Agency/Fire Board/City Council and provided background information regarding property acquisition. He said for the public's information, staff has completed the most conclusive, most definitive, most analytical strategic plan that has been done in Southern California which was presented to the Board in 2005 for consideration. He said subsequent to that, the 5-Year Implementation Plan was adopted to provide structure and some guidance in order to be able to meet the service demands. He said this 5-Year Implementation Plan, starting with FY 05/06 and going through 09/10, provided for the ability to meet those demands. He said although our current population is 172,000, we have many more people traveling through on the freeways/highways, recreating in the City and shopping in the City. He said the Fire Department cannot keep up with those demands occurring in this City; the demand is outpacing the services for emergency response. He added that to meet these demands, it's critical to add resources. Fire Chief Bryan said within the Strategic plan is a Six-Point Time Continuum, of which nobody in the Nation, that they're aware of, has developed. He said we realize that it is more than fire stations and fire personnel that provide emergency response, so all six elements were analyzed in the time continuum. He discussed each element of the Time Continuum: 1) Pre-911 Actions; 2) Dispatch Call Processing Time; 3) Reflex Turnout Time; 4) Travel Time; 5) On-Scene Actions-Intervention & Stabilization; and 6) Time to Terminate Incident. He said the City now has the ability to analyze incident data that was not available a few years ago due to state-of-the art technology. He said it has been determined that in the center of the City is an area that exceeds the 4-minute travel time. He said during the first six months of this year, the Fire Department responded to approximately 300 incidents in this area that had a travel time over four minutes; 110 of those were advanced life support or paramedic-based incidents. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez said assuming the call comes in, how long does it take for the firemen to wake up, get dressed and get on the truck. Fire Chief Bryan answered on a structure fire call, it will take approximately 1.5 minutes to dispatch; approximately 1.5 minutes to get the safety gear on and get the apparatus out of the door. He said we Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 13 are running less than 7 minutes travel time to 90% of the emergencies-fire and non-fire. He said we are already up to just under 10 minutes. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked if there is other area, other than travel time, that we could possibly improve upon. Fire Chief Bryan said they are doing all six of those now. He said they are doing everything they possibly can with the dollars available, with the effectiveness and the cost efficiency that they possibly can do. He said they are still working on some of the future programs, like call triage and prioritization. He said it's going to take a period of time to do that. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez said this is a consent calendar item, and he doesn't think they're ready to debate the merits at this meeting. Fire Chief Bryan said he understands that, but he would be remiss if he didn't let the Council and the public know that the Fire Department has done the best analysis that any department has done in Southern California. He said we are proud to tell Council that the fire service leading expert in this nation, the former State Fire Marshal, has looked at this strategic plan and said that he has not seen one this in- depth. He said he would also be remiss if he didn't tell Council that this area in the center of the City is critical because those people that the Fire Department is responding to are outside the four-minute travel time. He said that location that was presented is part of the implementation plan and previously received approval to get a concept design is critical. He said Base Line provides for the east/west travel for all the senior facilities that are along Base Line and 19'", and that will be a critical component in being able to get to them in a reasonable and appropriate time. He said the park is a good location; they have looked at other locations, as well, and there isn't any commercial property available. He said they have also taken a look at other cities and what they are doing as part of this analysis. He said there are 17 different facilities listed where they are co-locating public safety in the parks. He said when you start putting thousands of kids and adults in a water park, the Fire Department is a good partner to have when respiration stops and somebody is choking. He said every time you exceed one minute of travel time, you have lessened significantly a person's chance of survival when they stop breathing. He said being a good partner in that park is a good idea. Chairman/President/Mayor Kurth asked why you wouldn't put a lifeguard there to do that job instead of a whole fire station. Fire Chief Bryan answered that lifeguards can provide CPR, but they don't have advanced life support; a lifeguard would not have any airway tools to keep the airway open; if a person vomits and starts choking, it doesn't matter how much air you blow into their lungs, as now they have occluded their airways. He said paramedics have the tools to be able to drop a tube and take care of that. Fire Chief Bryan said they have looked at architectural features, as requested by Council. He said the architect for the station conceptual design has produced two drawings-an elevation with the apparatus doors and the side elevation, and they have given a list of about a dozen architectural features that are consistent with the Central Park building. He said they have reduced the size of that site and the station to the absolute minimum, and they'll be able to share with the Public Works Department a fuel island, instead of putting in two fuel islands at different places. Chairman/President/Mayor Kurth said he appreciates the Chief's support, but the Council wants to vote on it now. He said maybe they will look at all this information at a future date. Jack Lam, City Manager, said he would like to remind everybody about the fiscal linkages in the strategic plan when the Council reviews this. He stated that the Council asked to have a "pay as you go" program, and other than the ideal location, it not only saves the City a couple million dollars in terms of free- standing costs, but it would allow the City to use the Redevelopment Agency Fire Fund. He said the key is that there is no land available. He said staff is recommending that it stay within the Redevelopment service area. He said outside that Agency area, the Fire District will not be able to pay for a station. He said the Council's adopted goal for the staff is to move forward to get these stations built as soon as Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 14 possible. He said staff showed the Council a fiscal plan of how that can be accomplished over that 5-year period. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked how much money we are talking about for the Administration Building, the Central Park Station, the new station in the southwest and the new station in the northwest. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Kurth asked if we could leave the details for a further discussion. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the costs are $20 million - $30 million - $35 million. He said it merits a discussion at another time in a workshop. Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Williams said she would like all that information presented to the Council before the discussion. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez said he would like to have a workshop and discuss it at a different time. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Michael said we've seen those numbers before, but we need to look at them again. He said he is not in favor of approving anything on this consent calendar regarding these issues. He said possibly Mr. Lacy could submit to the Fire District and the City Manager's Office his thoughts. tie said it would be critically important that all five of the Councilmembers be in attendance whenever that workshop is scheduled since this is a very important component of the duties as an elected body. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Kurth said we need to make sure that the Council is confident that the placement is the best place regardless of what the investment is. He said to put it in the very best place, not just what is financially or politically the most expedient. He said placement is an issue; he stated his concern that there would be no park space left. He said our standards are far higher than those of some of the cities around us, and he thinks it's important for us to have our own call center so we can allocate our own resources. He said if we allocate those resources properly, we'll find that we have actually a lot more here than we realize. He commented that this is a consent calendar item, and we should try not to put controversial issues on the consent calendar. Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated that Council does not need to vote on anything unless they are going to act on them. Jack Lam, City Manager, suggested that they do not act, as these numbers on all the contracts will be different and need to be renegotiated. Chairman/President/Mayor Kurth stated that if we do not have consensus, these should be separated anyway. Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Williams stated discussion could elaborate on breaking them out. Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Michael stated he recalls that staff said they would be coming forth at this meeting and were going to bundle them together. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that it was indicated to Council that once they approve the Phase II, these contracts would be bundled because we negotiate cost effective contracts based upon that bundling. He said depending upon the ultimate decision by the Council, we will negotiate whatever architectural contracts that we would have and once that is done, then each one can be voted on separately. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Kurth asked what the Council should do based on a procedural level Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 15 Jim Markman, City Attorney, suggested that Council take no action. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Kurth stated they will then move to the next item. N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS N1. INTRODUCTION OF CITY PURCHASING STAFF AND OVERVIEW OF DIVISION (Oral Report) Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this item has been postponed. Item N4 was heard at this time; however, the minutes will remain in the original order of the agenda. N2. UPDATE ON WEST NILE VIRUS BY THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (Oral Report) Update presented by Brian Reisinger, Community Outreach Coordinator of the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District. ACTION: Report received and filed. N3. PRESENTATION OF THE ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT'S "LOVE 'EM AND LICENSE `EM"CAMPAIGN (Oral Report) Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director, introduced Susan DeAntonio, Fire Inspector, and "Gator," Canine Fire Investigator (retired). Mr. Pulcinella said to honor Gator's retirement after nine years of service, the Animal Care and Services Department has asked Gator to be the official spokes dog for the "Love "EM and License "EM" Campaign." Mr. Pulcinella presented the oral report and explained that all dogs over fours months old, by law, must have and wear a current license tag. He said there are discounts for spayed and neutered dogs for owners over 65 years of age, disabled owners and service dogs, and there is a voluntary license for cats. He announced that a special feature of the campaign began on September 15' whereby residents who have let their licenses lapse or who have not licensed their dogs in a timely manner will be able to renew their dogs' license without having to pay a late fee of $18.00. He said this late fee free pass will only last until January 1s`, at which time the late fee will be charged for all dogs found without a license. ACTION: Report received and filed. N4. APPROVAL OF RED HILL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, presented the staff report. Councilmember Michael said he heard the comment that in order for any community to privatize their streets, you almost need a unanimous consent of the property owners. Jim Markman, City Attorney, answered that he didn't think that is the case. He said with private streets there has to be some mechanism to maintain them and there has to be some organization which would request traffic enforcement of basic traffic laws within the private streets. He said the City then would have to vacate the street easements and there would have to be some organization that obtains title to these private streets, like a homeowners association. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 16 Mayor Pro Tem Williams asked if private streets automatically mean they would be gated; and if not, she asked what they would gain to make them private if they are not gated. Mr. Markman said private streets don't necessarily mean they need to be gated. He said unanimity may come into play if some of the people don't want to join an HOA (homeowners association). He said nothing can cause them to join it, and it could become a real awkward situation. He said it becomes next to impossible if there's a group of people who do not want to join. Councilmember Michael asked if stop signs and speed humps will help reduce the cut-through traffic. Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer said he believes it will discourage cut-through traffic, as it won't be as convenient or as fast to drive through Red Hill. Councilmember Michael asked if Vineyard and Carnelian are on the improvement plan for traffic synchronization. Mr. Gillespie answered that improved synchronization on Carnelian and Foothill will really help. Mr. Gillespie described the difference between a speed "bump" and a speed "hump." He said bumps are typically smaller, usually about 12' wide, and more gradual. Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated she thinks the "hump" would be a very good thing to do if the goal is to slow down and discourage some of that through traffic. Councilmember Gutierrez said that he can understand the concerns of the residents and that it looks like a combination of enforcement, more stop signs and some speed humps look the most viable. Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, said the stops signs would be phased in which would allow staff to implement stop signs as part of the residential neighborhood traffic management plan. Councilmember Spagnolo said it would be interesting to see the impact of the stop signs and to track what happens once they are installed. He said it needs to be shown that we are serious about trying to control what goes on in that community. He said maybe in a couple of months the Council could get a staff report on the progress. Jack Lam, City Manager, asked Mr. Gillespie if he, in the discussion with the residents, indicated the implications of the speed humps and the public safety's viewpoints of speed humps. Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, said he did talk to the residents more about the speed humps. He said the residents were informed of the affects with speed humps, such as slower response times and noise. He said that staff would like to have a policy and consensus from the City Council on speed humps for methodology and implementation and also a concurrence from the Council that they would like staff to implement speed humps. He said tonight just the stop signs are on the agenda for approval; staff will need to prepare a policy to bring back to Council at a later date. Councilmember Spagnolo said he is not in favor of speed bumps due to the impact regarding emergency services. Councilmember Michael said he would like to propose that this issue be heard by the Public Works Subcommittee so it can be fully digested, then bring it before Council along with a recommendation. A recess was taken at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:12 p.m. with all members present. Mayor Kurth opened the meeting to public comment. Addressing the City Council was Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 17 Paul & Jill Drop stated they have lived on Alta Cuesta for 12 years, and they are opposing the number of stop signs proposed. She said it was overkill, as a lot of the streets are not as much of the problem. They said many of the stop signs will only inconvenience the residents and not the cut-through traffic. They mentioned the safety hazard around the school for children and the fact that there aren't any crosswalks or signs at Valle Vista and Alta Cuesta intersections. Hank Stoy said he was one of the members of the roundtable chosen to discuss the Red Hill traffic issues. He said it's been a pleasure to work with fellow residents and City staff. He complimented John Gillespie and Joe O'Neil. He said conceptually what has been developed is workable and will improve traffic safety on the hill and reduce the cut-through traffic. He said there is a side benefit to increasing traffic enforcement, as each time the Police deploys, a lot of tickets will be written which would benefit the City's treasury. He said he would recommend that the Council vote for the staff report as presented. Burt Court said he has been at the same residence for 32 years, and said there are an excessive number of stop signs between his house and Carnelian. He said in most cases it's 3-way stops; he thinks it's extremely excessive since almost 90% of his travel would always be eastbound and he would be gridlocked for an excessive amount of time in the morning. He said the congestion is bad when school begins and ends. He said the Council is penalizing the Red Hill residents due to other people who pass through that neighborhood. He thinks law enforcement would be the easiest way to slow down and reduce traffic. David Nelson said he lives on Alta Cuesta and he agrees that at certain times there is excessive traffic, but that it is not continual. He thinks speed bumps or humps would deteriorate the quality of the neighborhood. He said he noticed that the biggest problem is in the evening; he said people go right through the stop sign at Camino Norte. He agrees that what is happening makes it more unpleasant for those who live here. Maris Smith stated a stop sign or speed hump should be implemented directly in front of the school instead of at Calle Feliz. She said the buses can't even get in and out due to traffic and people coming around the blind corner. She said there is a small crosswalk that is completely ignored and that last year the PTA purchased two tall cones announcing the fact that there is a school; also, a mirror was purchased that helps the blind spot of people who come out of the school. She said crossing guards have been requested. Councilmember Michael stated, as a resident and if he had it his way, he'd probably say to close Red Hill and get rid of cut-through traffic and speeders, but that isn't what the Red Hill residents want. He said stop signs do have some merit. He said he does like the idea of putting lines on the streets so that people believe there is not people going into other lanes (such as Alta Cuesta and Red Hill Country Club). He asked the Traffic Engineer if, from a traffic engineering standpoint, that is a viable solution. Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, said double yellow lines, or single lines, can be put on the streets, but the problem is when you put in center lines. He said then the speed increases due to the increased comfort of the motorists, as it appears to look like a busier street. Councilmember Michael said he agrees with the Valle Vista School stop sign (move from Calle Feliz to Valle Vista). He suggested taking away the stop sign at Camino Predera or at Calle Carabe, after talking with residents regarding which one. Mayor Pro Tem Williams asked what the recommended distance is between all-way stop signs. Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, answered at least 500 feet; he said streets are usually about 1000 to 1200 feet apart. Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated asked if the top five or six could be installed immediately at locations where there is more cross traffic. She said if thirteen are installed at once, you won't know which ones were effective. She said she would be supportive of the roundtable's decision of which ones are the most critical. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 18 Councilmember Gutierrez said he believes it is a problem as he has spent a lot of time on those streets. He said the people who are here tonight are the ones mostly affected. He said 345 people actually sent the survey back, which is a lot of people. He believes that many of them are not here tonight because they feel somewhat comfortable that we are going to do what most of them have recommended. He said a lot of them were in favor of speed humps. He said tonight, however, we are talking about stop signs. He agrees that we should start with a smaller number and work our way up. He said we need enforcement there on a regular basis, at least for a period of time. He said maybe we need more manpower, but don't know tonight if we can commit that kind of manpower. He is shocked that there is no crossing guard at the school. He said that needs to be looked at and moving a stop sign is a great idea. Councilmember Spagnolc suggested traffic enforcement to help mitigate the problem. He said the issuance of traffic citations will give us an idea if it's making a difference. Mayor Kurth said public safety has to be number one, and we have to make sure that the children and everybody else are safe. He suggested the phased implementation of traffic signs. He thinks the goal now is to approve this plan. Jack Lam, City Manager, said consideration tonight is to make some decision regarding the stop signs. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to direct staff to take a phased approach installing stop signs on Red Hill, starting with the most critical ones, to reduce speeding and cut-through traffic. O. COUNCIL BUSINESS O1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) No Council announcements were made. 02. UPDATE ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA ISSUES (Oral Report) ACTION: Item continued to September 19, 2007. 03. APPOINTMENT OF THE CITY'S DEPUTY CITY MANAGER. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, AS THE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE TERM FROM SEPTEMBER 2007 -JANUARY 2009 Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager, Community Development, presented the staff report and recommended the appointment of John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services, to replace Trang Huynh, Building Official, who is the current member of the Board of Trustees and no longer a resident of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael, to appoint John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services, as the representative to the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees for the term from September 2007 -January 2008. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 04. APPROVAL OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Councilmember Michael presented the staff report and said the City Council Subcommittee is recommending reappointing Robert Coberly and appointing Jackie Amsler and Luella Hairston to fill the two vacant positions. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes September 5, 2007 Page 19 MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to recommend the reappointment of Robert Coberly and appointment of Jackie Amsler and Luella Hairston. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. O5. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral Report) No update given. P. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Councilmember Gutierrez: Introduction of County Assessor, Bill Postmus, and discussion of property issues. Q. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn L. Scott, CMC Assistant City Clerk Approved: ' September 10, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District was held on Monday, September 10, 2007, in Celebration Hall (South) at the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center located at 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman/Vice President Diane Williams called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present were Councilmembers/Boardmembers/Agencymembers: Rex Gutierrez; L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, and Mayor Pro Tem/Vice ChairmanNice President Diane Williams. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; and John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services. Absent was: Mayor/President/Chairman Donald J. Kurth. ,.,... B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS C1. CONTINUED DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS CONCENSUS BUILDING AND TEAM BUILDING REVIEW - Dr. Bill Mathis Facilitator Dr. Bill Mathis, Facilitator, led the discussion. The Organizational Development Survey was discussed with the Council. D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk/Assistant Secretary/Secretary Approved: October 3, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Redevelopment Agency was held on Wednesday, October 3, 2007, in the Tri Communities Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor/Chairman Kurth called the meeting to order at 3:13 p.m. Present were Councilmembers/Agencymembers: Rex Gutierrez; Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Diane Williams, and Mayor/Chairman Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III: Daniel Schneider, Community Services Supervisor; Deborah Clark, Library Director; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk/Assistant Secretary. Absent was Councilmember/Agencymember: L. Dennis Michael B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Deborah Clark, Library Director, distributed newspapers to promote the "Big Read" and encouraged everyone to participate. C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS C1. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED ARROW ROUTE CENTER ACTION PLAN Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director, stated tonight's meeting is a follow up to a meeting held during the summer. He stated the Council had given staff direction to develop a strategy to accomplish the goals established. A staff report and power point presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office) were given by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, and Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent. Mayor/Chairman Kurth asked if other cities are doing this type of program. Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent, stated not like this one. Councilmember/Agencymember Spagnolo felt this would give the groups identified to participate a base to do their work. Councilmember/Agencymember Gutierrez inquired how many square feet were in this building. Special City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting October 3, 2007 Page 2 Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated approximately 10,000 square feet. Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent, stated there are about seven rooms to be utilized. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Williams asked if the City will control what programs these organizations want to do there. Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent, stated that is what the full time staff person working there will do. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated this can be brought out in the agreements to be signed in Phase III. Councilmember/Agencymember Spagnolo stated he had concerns of limiting these groups to referring their services only on Monday through Friday, and felt possibly the center should be open on Saturday and Sunday also. Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent, stated Monday through Friday is really their need, but staff would consider being open on Saturday if the need is there by the various groups. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated a lot of this will get decided when they meet with the groups in the future. Mayor/Chairman Kurth stated he likes the priority list. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Williams felt this was cutting edge and very exciting. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the recommendations in the staff report. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Michael absent). D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 3:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk/Assistant Secretary Approved: RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257865 9/26/2007 ARTHUR GIMMY INTERNATIONAL 1,600.00 AP - 00257866 9/26/2007 ARTHUR GIMMY INTERNATIONAL 800.00 AP - 00257886 9/26/2007 CAPITAL FUNDING SOLUTIONS 9,900.00 AP - 00257917 9/26/2007 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 339.36 AP - 00257922 9/26/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 351.53 AP - 00257928 9/26/2007 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC -13,227.50 AP - 00257931 9/26/2007 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 200,106.25 AP - 00257931 9/26/2007 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC -20,010.63 AP-00257938 9/26/2007 HILLWOODINVESTMENTS 600.00 AP - 00257939 9/26/2007 HILLWOOD INVESTMENTS 600.00 AP - 00257995 9/26/2007 NEW TECH SOLUTIONS INC 9,723.36 AP - 00258004 9/26/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 12,406.45 AP - 00258013 9/26/2007 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 7,211.16 AP - 00258018 9/26/2007 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 774,517.62 AP - 00258018 9/26/2007 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -77,451.76 AP - 00258023 9/26/2007 RASMUSSEN & ASSOCIATES 570.00 AP - 00258024 9/26/2007 RASMUSSEN & ASSOCIATES 570.00 AP - 00258028 9/26/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 4,587.00 AP - 00258028 9/26/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,418.00 AP - 00258028 9/26/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,401.50 AP - 00258028 9/26/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 19,282.72 AP - 00258038 9/26/2007 SCRRA 2,500.00 AP - 00258079 9/26/2007 US POSTMASTER 300.00 AP - 00258108 9/26/2007 WORLD ECONOMIC DEV ALLIANCE & BDO MA 4,950.00 AP - 00258147 10/3/2007 BANK OF NEW YORK, THE 1,643.00 AP - 00258217 10/3/2007 EMCOR SERVICE 15,300.00 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.86 AP - 00258240 10/3/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 3,891.00 AP - 00258240 10/3/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 1,051.31 AP - 00258240 10/3/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 10,307.56 AP - 00258269 10/3/2007 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 8,096.97 AP - 00258269 10/3/2007 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 487.50 AP - 00258269 10/3/2007 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 714.63 AP - 00258269 10/3/2007 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 9,083.75 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258303 10/3/2007 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES INC 10,250.00 AP - 00258317 10/3/2007 MARQUETTE COMMERCIAL FINANCE 2,057.68 AP - 00258345 10/3/2007 PB AMERICAS INC 22,040.00 AP - 00258359 10/3/2007 RACEWAY FORD 25,257.81 AP - 00258372 10/3/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,349.00 Total for Check ID AP: 1,058,855.93 Total for Entity: 1,058,855.93 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: ] Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Ponrait Layout Time: 08:54:0 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary September 30, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturtty J60 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Invesbnenl Fund 24,846,350.42 24,846,350.42 24,846,350.42 13.04 1 1 5.159 5.231 federal Agency Issues-Coupon 144,622,000.00 144,631,601.79 144,672,635.97 75.90 1,512 742 4.365 4.425 Treasury Secudties-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,053,125.00 5,002,343.75 2.62 661 516 4.654 4.719 Investment Agreements 16,063,555.86 16,083,555.86 16,083,555.86 6.44 1 1 3.632 3.682 190,753,906.26 190,616,633.07 190,606,686.00 100.00% 1,165 577 4.414 4.475 Investments Cash and Accrued Interest Passbo0k/Checking (not included in yieltl calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase Subtotal Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 522,405.33 191,276,311.61 September 30 Month Ending 726,561.12 195,380,861.73 4.52 522,405.33 6,183.33 528,588.66 191,345,221.73 Fiscal Year To Date 2,257,563.82 205,136,678.05 4.37 191,135,474.66 1 1 0.197 1,165 577 4.414 0.200 4.475 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted December 20, 2006. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Oow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. On October 21, 2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with Aegonlrransameriw in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will earn interest of 6.00% per annum through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that period. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement will earn interest ~o. The average annual rate of return over the five year period is 3.662% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above. James C. ~fn r asurer ~~ Reporting period 0910112007-0913012007 Run Daie: 10/102007 - 14'.29 522,405.33 6,183.33 528,588.fi6 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1) BymRept 6 41.202b Report Ver. 5.00 N City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments September 30, 2007 Page 2 CUSIP Investment N Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Mootly'a YTM Daya to Maturity 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 24,848,350.42 24,848,350.42 24,848,350.42 5.231 5.159 1 Subtotal and Average 25,308,350.42 24,848,350.42 24,846,350.42 24,848,350.42 5.159 1 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 31331OK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,500,000.00 2,474,218.75 2496,875.00 3.120 3.104 231 05/19/2008 31331OM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2,000,000.00 1,979,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 246 06/03/2008 31331TND9 1244 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,989,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.970 3.916 260 06/17/2008 31331TWH0 1253 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,985,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 168 03/17/2008 31331TWJ6 1254 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,956,250.00 3,997,500.00 3.550 - 3.517 413 11/17/2008 31331TG62 1263 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,500,000.00 3,475,937.50 3,479,000.00 3.920 4.012 392 10/27/2008 31331TU25 1272 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 3,000,000.00 2,994,375.00 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 70 12/10/2007 31331XNU2 1295 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/13/2007 5,000,000.00 5,014,062.50 5,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 865 02/12/2010 31331X205 1297 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,017,187.50 5,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 1,640 03/28/2012 31331XA36 1309 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/25/2007 4,000,000.00 4,072,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 1,332 05/25/2011 3133XiP27 1237 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 2,982,187.50 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945. 392 10/27/2008 3133X3DX8 1247 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,997,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.355 3.310 28 10/29/2007 3133X4XF3 1256 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,992,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.453 88 12/28/2007 3133X5WA2 1264 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 1,988,750.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.167 121 01/30/2008 3133XAR25 1277 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 1,000,000.00 994,687.50 1,000,000.00 4.080 4.024 322 08/18/2008 3133XAMW4 1278 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 1,000,000.00 996,250.00 999,750.00 4.000 3.954 144 02/22/2008 3133XJVL9 1294 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/13/2007 5,000,000.00 5,084,375.00 5,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,257 03/11/2011 3133XK5O4 1299 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,998,750.00 5.000 5.031 100 01/09/2008 3133XKUH6 1308 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,026,250.00 3,984,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,331 05/24/2011 3133XL3O4 1310 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,047,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1,702 05/29/2012 3133XLAH6 1312 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 08/18/2007 3,000,000.00 3,022,500.00 3,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,722 06/18/2012 3133XLBS1 1313 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,019,687.50 3,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 998 06/25/2010 3128X1 BD8 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,959,455.11 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 231 05/19/2008 3128X1 DKO 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 4,000,000.00 3,988,236.08 4,000,000.00 3.100 ~ 3.058 58 11/28/2007 3128X1JD0 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,941,085.05 4,998,500.00 3.030 2.995 254 06/11/2008 3128X2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,978,538.21 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 546 03/30/2009 3128X07G8 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,241,362.57 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 219 05/07/2008 3128X25V7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,997,919.92 1,997,800.00 2.920 2.918 18 10/19/2007 3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/26/2004 1,000,000.00 998,802.95 1,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 25 10/26/2007 3128X3CS0 1262 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/29/2004 5,000,000.00 4,993,949.89 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 28 10/29/2007 3128X3FC2 1267 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 2,994,672.09 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.708 53 11/23/2007 3128XSC48 1293 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/08/2007 5,000,000.00 5,014,414.98 5,000,000.00 5.375 5.301 861 02/08/2010 Run Data: 10/10/2007 -14:29 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2)BymRept641.20ID ~ W Report Ver. 5.00 CUSIP Investment# Issuer Federal Agency Issues -Coupon City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments September 30, 2007 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value 313396PE7 1296 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 3728X5R75 1298 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 3128XSR75 1302 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 3128XSK80 1306 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3136F5EE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3136F5GP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3136FSPB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3136F6Y06 1278 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3136FBFW0 1301 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3136F8LU7 1304 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 31398ABC5 1307 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 31398ADF6 1311 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Subtotal antl Average 148,869,650.55 02/26/2007 03/20/2007 04/04/2007 05/10/2007 07/29/2003 03/05/2004 03/16/2004 04/12/2004 02/22/2005 03/07/2007 05109/2007 05/21/2007 06/12/2007 1,572,000.00 z,ooo,060.00 3,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 z.ooo,ooo.oo 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 144,822,000.00 1,563,511.31 2,011,655.88 3,017,483.83 5,036,920.17 3,953,750.00 2,972,812.50 3,972,500.00 999,375.00 1,992,500.00 5,020,312.50 5,021,875.00 3,020,625.00 4,028,750.00 144,831,601.79 Sfatetl Book Value Rate 1,514,835.97 5.250 1,996,800.00 5.250 2,993,400.00 5.250 5,000,000.00 5.400 3,993,750.00 3.300 2,999,062.50 3.750 a,ooo.ooo.o0 4.040 1,000,000.00 3.020 1,998,600.00 4.000 5,000,000.00 5.430 4,996,250.00 5.250 2,991,000.00 5.300 3,995,600.00 5.600 144,672,635.97 Page 3 YTM Days to Matunty 360 Maturity Date 5.178 43 11/13/2007 5.217 1,627 03/15/2012 5.228 1,627 03/15/2012 5.324 1,614 03/02/2012 3.289 302 07/29/2008 3.707 434 12/08/2008 3.985 532 03/16/2009 2.979 11 10/12/2007 3.970 144 02/22/2008 5.356 1,253 03/07/2011 5.199 1,316 05/09/2011 5.296 1,880 05/07/2012 5.548 1,716 06/12/2012 4.365 742 Treasury Securities -Coupon 912828GJ3 1305 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal antl Average 5,002,343.75 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,053,125.00 5,002,343.75 4.750 5,000,000.00 5,053,125.00 5,002,343.75 4.654 516 02/28/2009 4.654 616 Investment Agreements SY51275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 16,083,555.88 16,083,555.66 16,083,555.86 3.682 3.632 1 Subtotal antl Average 16,052,516.36 16,087,555.86 16,063,555.86 16,083,555.86 7.632 1 Total antl Average 195,780,861.77 Ran oela 1a1azo67 -142s 190,753,906.28 190,816,633.07 190,606,886.00 4.414 577 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF PM2) SymRept 6.41.202b ~ A City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Cash September 30, 2007 Page 4 Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days [o CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Dale Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 522,405.33 522,405.33 522,405.33 0.200 0.197 1 Average Balance 0.00 Accruetl Interest al Purchase 6,183.33 6,183.33 1 SuOtotal 528,588.66 528,588.66 Total Cash antl Investmentss 195,380,861.73 191,276,311.61 191,345,221.73 191,135,474.66 4.414 577 R~~ oa~e: 1a1 onoo7 -14.zs Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep1641.202b ~ (J1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 5 Activity By Type September 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 Beginning Stated Trensaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Ra[e Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SY500005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.231 8,700,000.00 7,000,000.00 ' Subtotal 23,148,350.42 8,700,000.00 7,000,000.00 24,840,350.42 SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 387,315.19 0.00 Subtotal 135,090.14 387,315.19 0.00 522,405.33 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 31331TFG7 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.375 09/24/2007 0.00 1,996,562.50 31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.450 09/26/2007 0.00 2,000,000.00 3136F8GC3 1300 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 5.260 09/07/2007 0.00 4,998,250.00 Subtotal 157,667,448.47 0.00 8,994,812.50 144,672,635.97 Treasury Securities -Coupon Subtotal 5,002,343.75 5,002,343.75 Investment Agreements (Monthly Summary) SYS1275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 3.682 32,109.83 0.00 Subtotal 16,051,446.03 32,109.83 0.00 16,087,555.86 Total 198,004,678.81 9,119,425.02 15,994,812.50 191,129,291.33 Run Date: 10/102007 - 14:29 Portfolio CITY Cf ~ PM (PRF PM3) BymRepl641.202 ~ Report Ver. 5 W ' City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended August 31, 2007 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Bond Issue Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Assessment District No 93-1 Wells Fargo Imprvmnt Fund Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A' Masi Plaza Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A Redemp. Fund Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A' PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series Wells Fargo Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/111999 N/A` 1999 A (Sr) 8 1999 6 (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A' Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A` CFD No 2000-03 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Reserve Fund Escrow Fund Project Fund Cost of Issuance Fund Interest Account Principal Account Cost Yield Value 3.97% $ 282,926.97 3.97% 243,391.55 3.97% 169,675.85 $ 695,994.37 0.00% $ - 3.97% 607,058.95 3.97% 1,140,433.80 3.97% 966,777.40 3.97% 39,530.69 3.97% 378,136.79 $ 3,151,937.63 Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 4.01% Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 3.97% Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 0.00% Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 3.97% Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 3.97% Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 3.97% Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 3.97% CFD No 2000-01 South Etiwanda Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A Admin Expense Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A Interest Accounl Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A CFD No 2000-02 RC Corporate Park Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 NIA Reserve Fund Money Markel Fund 12112/2000 N/A Admin Expense Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A Interest Account Money Market Fund 6/31/2006 N/A Principal Account Money Markel Fund 8/31/2006 N/A $ 1,516.63 699,848.01 6,463,545.78 140,225.86 237,634.01 100,010.87 $ 7,642,781.16 4.05% $ 430.53 3.97% 111,820.64 3.27% 61.42 4.92% 88,916.50 3.97% 36,197.70 3.97% 35,003.82 $ 272,430.61 3.98% $ 2,628.83 3.97% 682,766.28 3.27% 61.42 4.92% 562,187.59 3.97% 193,801.15 3.97% 130,014.18 $ 1,571,459.45 V Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Paving Ascent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #1 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A . Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/112003 N/A Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A Cultural Center Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A CFD No 2003-Ot Improvement Areas #2 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A Reserve Fund Money Markel Fund 8/1/2003 N/A Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/112003 N/A Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #1 & #2 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund Reserve Fund Money Market Fund Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund Interest Account Money Market Fund Admin Exp. Fund Money Market Fund Principal Account Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 9/18/2001 9/18/2001 9/18/2001 91182001 9/18/2001 8/31 /2006 N/A N/A 1/4/1900 N/A N/A N/A N/A CFD No 2001-Ot Improvement Areas #3 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A Admin Exp. Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 3.97% $ 5,543. 56 3.97% 1,469,766. 01 3.97% 502,696. 27 3.97% 419,431. 46 3.97% 503,701. 93 3.97% 465,612. 93 3.97°/ 20,002. 17 $ 3,386,754.33 0.00% $ 0.04 3.97% 299,680.84 3.97% 89,049.10 0.00% 0.18 3.96% 5,000.54 $ 393,730.70 6.06% $ 38 .37 3.97% 1,089,994 .05 3.97% 4,959 .62 3.96% 3,803 .76 3.97% 417,946 .25 3.97% 159,447 .51 3.97% 250,027 .29 $ 1,926,216 .85 4.41% $ 2,411.47 3.97% 78,958.83 3.96% 8,910.80 3.97% 31,889.51 3.97% 31,328.42 3.97% 15,001.64 $ 168,500.67 W Bond Issue CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Estates CFD No 2006-01 Vintners Grove CFD No 2006-02 Amador on Route 66 Trustee andlor Paving Agent Wells Fargo Wells Fargo Wells Fargo Account Name Special Tax Fund Reserve Fund Escrow Fund Project Fund Cost of Issuance Fund Interest Account Principal Account Special Tax Fund Reserve Fund Acquisition Fund Agency Account Cost of Issuance Fund Interest Account Water District Account Special Tax Fund Reserve Fund Acquisition Fund Agency Account Cost of Issuance Fund Interest Account Water District Fund Purchase Maturity Cost Investment Date Date Yield Value Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Money Markel Fund 7/13/2006 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25!2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A Money Marke[ Fund 1/25/2007 N/A 0.00% $ 9.98 4.92% 3,115,880.32 0.00% 0.00 4.92% 5,481,357.58 0.00% 0.00 4.92% 1,130,272.01 4.92% 440,059.33 $ 10,167,579.22 0.00% $ 5.07% 392,713.74 5.00% 3,604,304.76 5.07% 756,133.82 5.07% 106,980.03 5.07% 144,963.91 5.07% 674,996.22 $ 5,660,112.48 0.00% $ 5.07% 205,312.64 5.07% 1,452,989.73 5.07% 428,362.98 5.07% 80,406.14 5.07% 74,396.11 5.07% 612,840.31 $ 2,854,307.91 37,911,805.38 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. $ 37,911,805.38 P10 -\ STAFF REPORT ~r=~~~ ; ~^~ ENGINEERING DEPI,RT1\IENT sr Date: October 17, 2007 RANCHO CUCAIv90NGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Subject: APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR "EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT AND CROSS AISLE AND SEAT WATERPROOFING" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" TO BE FUNDED FROM RDA STADIUM COMPLEX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND AND RDA TAX ALLOCATION BOND PROCEEDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE, RESPONSIBLE BIDDER AND PROVIDE THE AGENCY WITH A COMPREHENSIVE BID SUMMARY AT THE NOVEMBER 7, 2007 MEETING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the specifications for "Epicenter Stadium Seat Replacement and Cross Aisle and Seat Waterproofing" be approved and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from RDA Stadium Complex Capital Improvement Fund and RDA Tax Allocation Bond Proceeds and authorize the City Engineer to award a contract to the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder and provide the Agency with a comprehensive bid summary at the November 7, 2007 meeting. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The fiscal year budget for 2007-2008 includes two capital improvement projects at the Epicenter baseball stadium, 1) replacement of the original stadium seats that were installed in 1992-93, and 2) cross aisle and seat waterproofing. In researching the specifications for this project, staff has been notified that there is a minimum 3 month lead time at the factory for manufacture of replacement seating. In order to provide reasonable time for the purchase and installation of these seats and waterproofing of the cross aisles and seating area prior to the April 2008 baseball season, it is imperative that this project move forward immediately for advertising of bids and award of the contract. With the Agency's authorization, bids will be opened on November 1, 2007 and based on review and analysis by staff, the award will be made by the City Engineer. An update and bid summary will be provided to the Agency at the November 7, 2007 meeting. The estimated cost for this project is $1,200,000. Res ctfully Submitted, Willi J. O'Neil C' Engineer WJO:DB:dlw P11 RESOLUTION NO. /~A D~ ~h A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT AND CROSS AISLE AND SEAT WATERPROOFING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency be and are hereby approved as the specifications for the "EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT AND CROSS AISLE AND SEAT WATERPROOFING". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON November 1, 2007 sealed bids or proposals for "EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT AND CROSS AISLE AND SEAT WATERPROOFING" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Monday, October 29, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter, 8408 Rochester Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY. Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process. P12 Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, California, marked, "BID FOR EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT AND CROSS AISLE AND SEAT WATERPROOFING." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: 1. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or 2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or 3. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Resolution No. PAGE 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10°/0) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. P13 Resolution No. PAGE 4 Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a "D34" (Prefabricated Equipment). In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT may be directed to: Dave Blevins/Ty Quaintance, Public Works Maintenance Manager/Facilities Superintendent Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, ext. 4101 or 4092 (909) 477-2731, fax By order of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Dated this 17"'day of October 2007. ADVERTISE.ON: October 18, 2007 and October 25, 2007. P14 STAFF REPORT - E\GINEERING DEP_~RTi,IENT RANCHO Date: October 17, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Q By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer `~' Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $800,000 TO DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000 FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL FROM GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE (PHASES 4a AND 4b), AND THE VISTA PARK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EAST OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, TO BE FUNDED FROM BERAUTIFICATION FEES, ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650!1615110-0, PARK DEVELOPMENT FEES, ACCOUNT NOS. 1 1 20 30 5 56 50/1 5441 20-0 & 11203055650/1615120-0, AND 2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 26608015650/1189660-0; AND APPROPRIATE AN AMOUNT OF $475,000 TO ACCOUNT NO. 26608015650/1189660-0 FROM 2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve the Professional Services Agreement with Dan Guerra and Associates to provide civil, landscape and trail lighting design services for the construction of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail improvements for Phases 4a & 4b between Grove Avenue and Amethyst Avenue, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto, and to approve an appropriation in the amount of $475,000 from 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Fund Balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail, extending throughout the City has been broken into a series of phases to accommodate the funding and construction of the trail. Three such phases, Phases 1, 2 and 3 -extending from Amethyst Avenue to 1,320 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, is nearing completion of construction. Phase 5, from east of Etiwanda Avenue to the east City boundary at the I-15 Freeway has been designed and is awaiting a Caltrans permit for work within their right-of-way. Construction of this phase is expected to begin next spring. The last two phases, Phase 4a from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue, and Phase 4b from Vineyard Avenue to Amethyst Avenue will complete the trail throughout the City. Because of the unique design challenges associated with these two phases it was decided to combine the two together. The design of these two remaining segments will include, along with the trail; a trailhead in the vicinity of Vineyard Avenue; Vista Park which fronts onto Foothill Boulevard just east of the old railroad bridge crossing Foothill Boulevard; points of access between the Cucamonga Creek trail system and the Pacific Electric trail; trail lighting throughout the trail; and landscaping at Grove Avenue, Hellman P15 P16 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT RE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT W/DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES -PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL FROM GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE OCTOBER 17, 2007 PAGE 2 Avenue, Base Line Road, and Amethyst Avenue. Staff has been in touch with the County Museum for the possibility of teaming up to share the parking lot at the Rains House for the trailhead. The design must also address the severe grade issues as the trail winds around Red Hill. , The proposal from Dan Guerra and Associates met all of the City's requirements in an amount of $800,000 to be funded from Account Nos. 11103165650/1615110-0 (Beautification Fees), 11203055650/1544120-0 & 11203055650/1615120-0 (Park Development Fees), and 26608015650/1189660-0 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Funds). The firm has provided design services for other phases of the trail and is uniquely aware of the problems inherent to the site. The firm has a great deal of information already generated in their records that will be used far this project. Respectfully submitted, Willi J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WCS:Is Attachments f"~~ s r __..____ HILLSI E RD ILL IDE R N N ILSO AV I WL NAV E EC LSON pV ~ ¢ ~ _ a Y' ~' a y w y ~ BAY N ST \ ~ N \ w I 1 0 FW 121 z ~ 1 210 w p J z V CTORI ~ N J 3 > .~ ~ ~ _.....,._. ~._~__ ~.._. B _.__,_ $ELI ___ -r. ER -w ._- ~ __ BASE IN A . ~ / ` iQ CHU CH S / CHU H S C i z y ~~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ I f., F OTH BL I- ~~ w ~ ~ RRO ¢ O JERSEY BL ~ 8 HST < _ I ~ 7 HST ] 6TH ST -•- \ = HST F ~ d 4 Q Q 4TH 5 O FQ- w PROJECT P17 Vicinity Map Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Phases 4a and 4b Grove Ave to Amethyst Ave STAFF REPORT FNGINEEffiNG DEP ~RTT373N'I' Date: October 17, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager •: P18 ~~~ r ~ .. r ~ "r J J RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVE AND AWARD A CONTRACT TO EMCOR SERVICE FOR THE "ANIMAL CARE CENTER AIR CONDITIONING/VENTILATION UPGRADE" PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,495,450 AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $225,000 FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801-5650/1654650-0 AND APPROPRIATE $1,720,450 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801-5650/1654650-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board approve and award a contract to EMCOR Service for the "Animal Care Center Air Conditioning/Ventilation Upgrade" project in the amount of $1,495,450 and authorize the expenditure of a contingency in the amount of $225,000 funded from 2650801-5650/1654650-0 and appropriate $1,720,450 into account number 2650801- 5650/1654650-0. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The rapid development of our new Animal Care Program and associated facility upgrades have been a resounding success with the general public. The popularity of our new program has come with a price of greatly increased demand and the need to adapt quickly to new ways of doing business. In response, continued refinement of the operational programs designed to best house and care for our animal friends is going on at a rapid pace. One major impact has been on the original Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units installed in 1992-93. As this equipment is beginning to reach the end of its average design life, it has also become clear the system was not designed to adequately service the increased demands we have placed on the facility. Staff has also kept up to date on changing technology in the HVAC industry relative to providing healthier and more energy efficient systems. In conjunction with addressing the life span and changing operational issues related to our HVAC system through upgrading and adapting our maintenance practices, staff solicited the professional evaluation of the old system and reviewed proposed solutions from two major HVAC companies. Proposals were developed based on extensive scoping meetings and several site visits by key representatives of both EMCOR Service/ Mesa Energy Inc. and from Siemens Building Technologies Inc. Staff also provided for peer review of both consultants and subsequent evaluation of the proposal submitted by EMCOR through TMAD Taylor and Gains Mechanical Engineers and C.W. Driver Construction Management. Although Siemens was not able to respond with a timely proposal, both their team and all of the other professionals involved, agree that there is significant urgency related to ensuring the health of our employees and our animal clients by modernizing our HVAC system at the facility. The recommended appropriation includes the contract amount for the design and construction of a state of the art environmental system. The contingency requested exceeds the customary 10% allowance due to a number of ancillary improvements still under design. For example, modernizing of the building's electrical distribution system and vandal-resistant protection for new HVAC equipment are planned as well as upgrading the emergency standby generator to meet new AOMD specifications and sizing. It is staff's intention to seek competitive proposals for these items from both Toby B. Hayward (TBH) and EMCOR. Respect Submitted, William .O ei City En ineer WJO:DB:dlw RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Fl9 Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00257863 9/26/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,215.00 AP - 00257863 9/26/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 2,430.00 AP - 00257863 9/26/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1;215.00 AP - 00257863 9/26/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,154.25 AP - 00257863 9/26/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 303.75 AP - 00257863 9/26/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,215.00 AP - 00257863 9/26/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,215.00 AP - 00257876 9/26/2007 BELL, MIKE 222.34 AP - 00257881 9/26/2007 CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF ARSON INVEST] 65.00 AP - 00257882 9/26/2007 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 45,985.25 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00 AP - 00257920 9/26/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 2,072.94 AP - 00257955 9/26/2007 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 75.00 AP - 002579SS 9/26/2007 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 75.00 AP - 002579SS 9/26/2007 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 75.00 AP - 00257955 9/26/2007 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 75.00 AP - 00257957 9/26/2007 JERKINS, PATRICK 48.00 AP - 00257965 9/26/2007 KME FIRE APPARATUS 132.53 AP - 00257965 9/26/2007 KME FIRE APPARATUS 147.24 AP - 00257970 9/26/2007 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 129.52 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,SS5.24 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 33.63 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,004.74 AP - 00257989 9/26/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 22.62 AP - 00257992 9/26/2007 NAUSHA, CHRISTEN 1,li2.99 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 161.73 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 20.73 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 69.48 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1,077.49 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 153.55 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 378.20 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 20.00 AP - 00258036 9/26/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 2,901.17 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 186.27 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 86.16 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 77.09 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 50.31 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 10.93 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 173.61 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,636.92 AP - 00258051 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FPO'S 65.00 AP - 00258063 9/26/2007 TER,MINIX PROCESSING CENTER 48.75 AP - 00258074 9/26/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 38.66 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 534.26 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 170.77 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 149.24 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258088 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 39.31 AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 25.00 AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 10.70 AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 22.28 AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 11.30 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pagc: 1 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_POR"CRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 08:58:0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P20 Alrenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER; JANET 17.39 AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 15.06 AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 3.00 AP - 00258089 9/26/2007 WALKER, JANET 10.00 AP - 00258091 9/26/2007 WALTON, KEVIN 355.02 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 125.19 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 75.30 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 99.76 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 225.92 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 176.04 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 125.19 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 150.65 AP - 00258114 10/3/2007 49ER COMMUNICATIONS 109.95 AP - 00258123 10/3/2007 AIRGAS WEST 167.10 AP - 00258125 10/3/2007 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 2,651.73 AP - 00258135 10/3/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,154.25 AP - 00258152 10/3/2007 BERRY, DAVID 75.12 AP - 00258172 10/3/2007 CARNES, SANDY 339.02 AP - 00258174 10/3/2007 CCHMC 1,400.00 AP - 00258180 10/3/2007 CHEMSEARCH 1,665.85 AP - 00258181 10/3/2007 CHROME ZONE, THE 464.00 AP - 00258190 10/3/2007 COMMERCIAL DOOR COMPANY INC 1,507.41 AP - 00258191 10/3/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.84 AP - 00258213 10/3/2007 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 376.26 AP - 00258217 10/3/2007 EMCOR SERVICE 3,610.00 AP - 00258229 10/3/2007 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 175.00 AP - 00258230 10/3/2007 FIREMASTER 183.14 AP - 00258236 10/3/2007 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 32.11 AP - 00258238 10/3/2007 FTS INC. 414.84 AP - 00258241 10/3/2007 G.T. ENGINEERING 170.70 AP - 00258254 10/3/2007 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 6.41 AP - 00258275 10/3/2007 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 3.87 AP - 00258281 10/3/2007 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 430.25 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 4,969.44 AP - 00258311 10/3/2007 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC 3,209.39 AP - 00258312 10/3/2007 LUDLUM MEASUREMENTS INC 112.06 AP - 00258321 10/3/2007 MCI 8.00 AP - 00258328 10/3/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 77.54 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 177.31 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 19.63 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -4.73 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12.55 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -7.41 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1 11.41 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 4.73 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1.92 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 399.58 AP - 00258341 10/3/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 9,396.00 AP - 00258341 10/3/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 11,668.67 AP - 00258341 10/3/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 7,516.80 AP - 00258341 10/3/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 1,879.20 AP - 00258341 10/3/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 46,674.70 AP - 00258341 10/3/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 58,343.38 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:58:0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AEenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258342 10/3/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 425.00 AP - 00258348 10/3/2007 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS 8,673.44 AP - 00258348 10/3/2007 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS -366.39 AP - 00258361 ] 0/3/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 45.00 AP - 00258366 10/3/2007 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 22.95 AP - 00258372 10/3/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,453.00 AP - 00258377 10/3/2007 ROEDER, JEFF 1,923.28 AP - 00258383 10/3/2007 SCEPIOA 125.00 AP - 00258390 10/3/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 176.67 AP - 00258390 10/3/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 176.67 AP - 00258391 10/3/2007 SOUTH COAST AQMD 99.09 AP - 00258391 10/3/2007 SOUTH COAST AQMD 99.09 AP - 00258391 10/3/2007 SOUTH COAST AQMD 78.81 AP - 00258391 10/3/2007 SOUTH COAST AQMD 78.81 AP - 002S839S 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,045.40 AP - 002S839S 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,691.57 AP - 002S839S ] 0/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,837.03 AP - 00258408 10/3/2007 SWIFTY SIGN 96.00 AP - 00258426 10/3/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 71.30 AP - 00258427 10/3/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 1,179.99 AP - 00258427 10/3/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 631.49 AP - 00258427 10/3/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 84.25 AP - 00258427 10/3/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 101.50 AP - 00258427 10/3/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 124.41 AP - 00258427 10/3/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 160.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 462.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 462.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 21.32 AP - 00258430 ] 0/3/2007 VERIZON 61.20 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 534.26 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 21.33 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 462.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 462.06 AP - 00258443 10/3/2007 WOLF AND ASSOCIATES INC., DON 3S3.9S Total for Check ID AP: 258,166.45 Total for Entity: 258,166.45 P21 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 08:58:0 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary September 30, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Baok % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value ~ Value Portfolio Term Ma[urtty 360 Equiv. J65 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 2,020,916.33 2,020,916.33 2,020,91fi.33 27.69 1 ~ 1 5.159 5.231 Passbook/Checking Accounts 279,120.88 279,120.88 279,120.88 3.82 1 1 0.197 0.200 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,015,467.23 4,998,400.00 68.49 840 646 5.174 5.246 7,300,037.21 7,315,504.44 ~ 7,298,437.21 100.00°/ 575 442 4.980 5.049 Investments Totat Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 35,255.20 127,491.91 Average Daily Balance 8,304,346.50 ~ 9,651,897.71 Effective Rate of Return 5.17°/ 5.13% I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted December 20, 2006. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the neM six months estimated expenditures. The attached State of California Pooled a stment Account (LAIF) statement is provided under the City and Slate official Investment Policy and represents the monthly source of valuation for the prior month's end. iJwc~l ~ ___[~/ ° /O 7 Joh ison,~- asurer Reporting period 09101/2007-0913012007 Rvn os1e: 1a1 onoo7 -14:za Portfolio FIRE CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept 6 41.20ID Report Ver. 5.00 N N R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management page z Portfolio Details -Investments September 30, 2007 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Ma[urlty Dale Local Agency Investment Fund SV50001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 2,020,916.33 2,020,916.33 2,020,916.33 5.231 5.159 1 Subtotal and Average 3,155,916.33 2,020,916.33 2,020,916.33 2,020,916.33 5.159 1 Passbook/Checking Accounts SY50002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal and Average 150,030.17 279,120.88 .279,120.88 279,120.88 0.200 279,120.88 279,120.88 279,120.88 0.197 1 0.197 1 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3133XKT96 1006 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/14/2007 2,000,000.00 2,006,875.00 1,999,000.00 5.125 5.081 591 05/14/2009 3128XSC30 ~ 1005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 02/13/2007 3,000,000.00 3,006,592.23 2,999,400.00 5.300 5.236 682 08/13/2009 Subtotal and Average 4,998,400.00 5,000,000.00 5,015,467.23 4,998,400.00 S.t74 646 Total antl Average 8,304,346.50 Run Dete: 10/10/200] -14:26 7,300,037.21 7,315,504.44 7,298,477.21 4.980 442 PoMolio FIRE CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRepl6.41.202b N G3 Report Ver. 5.00 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Activity By Type September 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions ~ Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Ra[e Date or Deposits or Wlthtlrawals Balance Page 3 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 5.231 0.00 1,475,000.00 Subtotal 3,495,916.33 0.00 1,475,000.00 2,020,916.33 PassbooklChecking Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 133,542.11 0.00 Subtotal 145,576.77 133,542.11 0.00 279,120.88 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon Subtotal 4,996,400.00 4,998,400.00 Total 8,639,695.10 Run Dale: 1 onorzoo7 - ta:ze 133,542.11 1,475,000.00 7,298,437.21 Portfolio FIRE CI N PM (PRF_PM3) 9ymRepl6.d1.202 A Repon Ver. 5 00 P25 Pooled State of California Money Investment Account Market Valuation 8/31 /2007 Description Carrying Cost Plus Accrued Interest Purch. Fair Value "Accrued Interest United States Treasury: Bills $ 1,953,062,638.80 $ 1,977,264,000.00 NA Notes $ - $ - $ - Federal Agency: SBA $ 619,387,334.13 $ 617,810,374.95 $ 5,765,169.38 MBS $ 1,250,299,293.64 $ 1,233,564,492.37 $ 5,904,449.39 Bonds $ 6,152,890,131.30 $ 6,159,015,934.85 $ 95,423,090.35 Floaters $ 644,862,433.82 $ 644,889,600.00 $ 3,961,515.62 Discount Notes $ 7,372,547,881.26 $ 7,461,130,900.00 NA FHLMC PC $ 385,295.41 $ 397,967.97 $ 6,269.63 GNMA $ 203,072.78 $ 228,031.27 $ 2,017.01 Bankers Acceptances $ - $ - NA Bank Notes $ 1,000,000,000.00 $ 999,669,400.00 $ 15,828,597.23 CDs $ 9,965,086,176.76 $ 9,959,766,184.15 $ 110,114,629.16 Commercial Paper $ 9,313,452,466.08 $ 9,362,825,191.39 NA Corporate: Floaters $ 119,024,753.95 $ 116,299,390.00 $ 811,745.28 Bonds $ 255,065,509.13 $ 255,533,197.91 $ 2,677,884.97 Repurchase Agreements $ - NA Reverse Repurchase $ (99,250,000.00) $ (99,250,000.00) $ (416,215.90) Time Deposits $ 8,869,495,000.00 $ 8,869,495,000.00 NA AB 55 8 GF Loans $ 9,677,985,592.76 $ 9,677,985,592.76 NA TOTAL $ 57,094,497,579.82 $ 57,236,625,257.62 $ 240,079,152.12 Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 57,476,704,409.74 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 8 General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). STAFF REPORT FIRE PROTECITONDISTRICT Date: October 17, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager P26 (~~.`'~y .Y ~' », ~- ~. jZavcxo C',UC~IDSONGA From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TWO (2) FORD ESCAPE HYBRID VEHICLES Recommendation It is recommended that the Board of Directors authorize the purchase of two (2) Ford Escape hybrid vehicles for the Fire District from Sunrise Ford of Fontana, California, through a competitive bid process, in the amount of $47,665 to be funded by account number 3289501- 5604 (Capital Outlay-Vehicles), as approved in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget. Background The Fire Board approved the purchase of two (2) new and vehicles in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 budget to be used by new staff hired to fill two (2) Fire Prevention Specialist positions, also approved in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget. The District currently has three (3) Ford Escape Hybrids and has determined they are well suited for the intended purpose and meets the District's requirements. Vehicle specifications were provided to Purchasing by the City's Fleet Maintenance Division for Fire. Purchasing prepared a formal request for bid, number 07/08-010, and sent it to 16 dealers. Eight (8) responses and one (1) no bid were received. After analysis of the bid responses by the Fire District and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined that Sunrise Ford has submitted the lowest, most responsive, responsible bid that meets the specifications required by the Fire Protection District. Attached for review is the final bid abstract. Respectfully submitted, `' \ Peter M. B an Fire Chief VEHICLES), AS APPROVED IN THE ADOPTED FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 BUDGET Item 1 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION ABSTRACT OF QUOTES RECEIVED FOR: RFB# 07/08-010 THIRTEEN (13) FORD ESCAPE XLS HYBRIDS 1 2 3 Vendor Name Sunrise Ford Fritts Ford Raceway Ford Contact Rick Arguello William McFarland Lyle Nielsen City Fontana Riverside Riverside Phone 909-822.4401 ext2161 951-353-8800 619-449-2379 Terms: Terms: Terms: 120 Da s Delive ARO 90-180 Da s Delive ARO 120 Da s Delive ARO F.O. B: F.O. B: F.O.B: Description of items to quote Qty Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost 2008 New Ford Escape XLS 13 $ 23,832.68 $ 309,824.84 $ 23,970.00 $ 311,610.00 $24,121.00 $ 313 573.00 Hybrid , .............................................. Doc Fees ...................... . ................................... ......................................... .................................... .......................................... .................................... ........................................... Sub-Total ............................................................................ ...................... .................................... $ 309,824.84 ......................................... .................................... $ 311,610.00 .......................................... .................................... $ 313,573.00 ........................................... Tax .................................................................... ...................... .................................... _$.........._24,011:43.. .................................... _$............_24.149:78.. .................................... _$............._24,301:91.. Tire Fee ............................................................................ ...................... .................................... $ 113.75 ......................................... .................................... $ 113.75 .......................................... .................................. $ 113.75 TOTAL $ 333,950.02 $ 335,873.53 .. ........................................... $ 337,988.66 Vendor Comments: Purchasing Comments: Exceptions: No Exceptions: - No Exceptions: ................................................................................................... Interior Color Stone Cloth Likes speed as per addendum. Electric Motor 155 HP Air Conditioning: Electronic Aulo - Temp -Safety likes: TLN2AA LED Amber Talon and TLN1A LED Amber Talon Single Head. Prepared by Anna Bowler 10/10/2007 N V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION Item 1 2 ABSTRACT OF QUOTES RECEIVED FOR: 4 5 6 Vendor Name Moss Bros. Ford Burch Ford Kearney Mesa Contact Gary Wang Many Hernandez John Moreshead City Colton La Habra San Diego Phone 909-825-1212 Ext. 3152 562-691-5483 858-715-3434 Terms: Terms: Terms: Delive ARO 60 - 180 Da s Delive ARO 42 - 84 da s Delive ARO 120 Da s F.O. B: F.O. B: F.O.B: Description of items to quote Qty Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost 2008 New Ford Escape XLS 13 $24,292.98 $ 315,808.74 $24,410.00 $ 317,330.00 $ 24 465.00 $ 318 045.00 Hybrid , , Doc Fees ............ ......................................... 0.00 ....................................... ......................................... Sub-Total ............................................................................ ...................... .................................... $ 315,808.74 .......................................... .................................... $ 317,330.00 ......................................... ....................................... $ 318,045.00 ......................................... Tax ............................................................................ ..................... .................................... $ 24,475.18 .......................................... .................................... $ 24,593.08 ......................................... ....................................... $ 24,648.49 ......................................... Tire Fee ............................................................................ ..................... .................................... $ 113.75 ......................................... .................................... $ - ......................................... ....................................... $ 113.75 ......................................... TOTAL $ 340,397.67 $ 341,923.08 $ 342,807.24 Vendor Comments: .................................................................................................... .................................... .......................................... .................................... ......................................... ....................................... ......................................... Purchasing Comments: Exceptions: No Exceptions: Exceptions: "'~'~~~~~'~~~~'~~'~~~~'~'~"'~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~'~~~~~~~~'~~"~~'"~'~~~~~'~~~~~~~~'~~'~"~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Interior Color Stone Cloth -Safety Likes speed as per addendum. Interior Color Stone Cloth likes Whalen #: TLN2A and TLN1A. Electric Motor 330 volt maximum - Rear axle gear ratio: N/A due to ECUT. Safety likes as speed by Miramar truck body and equipment. Whalen # TLN2AA and Talon TLN1A. Prepared by Anna Bowler 10/1012007 -D N W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item 1 2 PURCHASING DIVISION ABSTRACT OF QUOTES RECEIVED FOR: 7 8 9 Vendor Name Redlands Ford Fairview Ford Clippinger Ford Contact Jerry Timper Todd Eff Steve Cerni City Redlands San Bernardino West Covina Phone 909-793-3211 909-386-0281 626-339-6216 Terms: Terms: Terms: • Delive ARO 60 Da s Delive ARO 90 Da s Delive ARO 210 Da s F.O. B: F.O. B: F.O. B: Description of Items to quote Qty Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost 2008 New Ford Escape XLS 13 $ 24,497.00 $ 318,461.00 $ 24,548.00 $ 319,124.00 NO BID NO BID Hybrid Doc Fees 715.00 Sub-Total ............................................................................ ...................... ..................................... $ 318,461.00 ............................................... .................................... $ 319,124.00 ........................................... ..................................... $ - ........................................ Tax $ 24,680.73 $ 24,732.11 $ - Tire Fee ............................................................................ ...................... ..................................... $ 113.75 ............................................... .................................... $ 113.75 .............................. ............ .................... . . $ - . TOTAL $ 343,970.48 . $ 343,969.86 ............ .. . ............. .......................... $ - Vendor Comments: ................................................................................................... ...................................... ............................................... .................................... ........................................... ..................................... ........................................ Purchasing Comments: No Exceptions: Exceptions: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~~~"~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~~'~"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sa(ety likes Whalen TLN1A and whale Interior Color Stone Cloth TLN2AA dual LED. Front Wheel Drive. Likes as speed. Prepared by Anna Bowler .10/10/2007 N STAFF REPORT RgNCHO CUCADiONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: October 17, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF ANNEXATION BOUNDARY MAP NO. 07-8 P30 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a resolution adopting a boundary map showing property (located on the south side of 81h St., west of Hellman Ave.) proposed to be annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. BACKGROUND CalEast Phelan 8~h & Vineyard, LLC (SUBTPM18794) is conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. In order to initiate formal proceedings to annex the referenced parcel into CFD No. 85-1, a Resolution adopting an annexation boundary map is presented for Board consideration and approval. The boundary map (Exhibit "A") illustrates the territory proposed to be annexed. The territory is inclusive of the entire project. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ ~~ eter M. Bryan Fire Chief Attachments ~ ~ EXHIBIT 'A' P31 AUGUST, zoos ANNEXATION MAP NO.OI-F OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. BS1 OF 7HE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA _-_~_---__~_y~P. R_NLROAD ~ ]d4 W' . ]f w aaP.3] L___ __________ -----------~-- ____ enESTaEE~ NISTY'3l1 Rgy]D'}S2 6].!G' n00' RM]e'W'w e3_ learn' RPN. Ya. o11N'OV]l p, cRlvwc xYlF p. 's,~ ~`- ~ I/Y ~icR .rtizln ~_ Md __ _--- ~_ -- -' - 6]D~ -- - ~_ - ~ ~ MN06'M' NOiE,RMCisR aiocwu~® ttiswi ci. IIFD N M CIfKE w M[ YO[fMY (f M[ RAYpq dLILd,L.L FIRE Rg1F[M, dSRKi. Ly1fdM. MS _D.r w ~,]C0l YYLNEtMr wo dCxYwGx IMC MOIECnp gSIKi Sixrt w L4fCYFir , 1YIEHr (ERTr M1t M tSMY YIP SxPRNG g1xDYEES 6 R1MMY CR W'Ke ID RE INM1EGD !0 M1YW M1 F/.W I(S MMC} N1 6S-I w ME RWpO dLYq,D1 INE vROrtciwn o-swci, du1i. w sw eE1MYmrn sort o cu~aYw w.ss IwROL<o er mE eauo rr o-MC*ars w sow roc vROrtcnw darner Il 11rto-3.a1 uccpD xEMw. x[l0 w M _OPY y 3p]l, Br ,1S MS2VMY1 Y6 iws uMUnw uIV IuudlDS M $DU<ur uIr rw crRlrnm Fnwn¢ dames xa es-1 a M RY,po CuLIW.I,D1 n¢ wortcnw o-smci. couxM1 a s.Y B[RNA11gMq s12 6 C4fww.l RCw IECw[fD m dlw 6 YMS cf ISY59O1} Y9 CW1ANirr PIw/n[s g51PoC1S xr P14 N M d54I IY ME cdmn RE<vaR rw M comn a sY1 Yp1MDt,q cYroenw YCREIMr R.wpw dClvwG1 MF IR02CMx d511Kr silR cf LYfMYi. 1w5 ueP PREPMEd.BY: A sociated Engf~r~.l~ 3111 EMT MEL9YTWtf~wliMp,GYtlw `^ ~LP rEL. dDY14gY1M]~FAti D1Di RL1Lm1 y 111P ' !Y[5 JwN YBiwSµ L$ Ml0 D.11E B YrY Y :$ ~ s°-] SHEET 1 OF 1 I~ Iw nK YN x.5 RCw r11Ep VMER DDp1YLRl XWRLR MR ~ DIr 6 XO]. Pf ~Y. F BDw w YYS 6 ISYSS1FNi 1xp LwIRMM1 r1(R,MS dS1R,LiS .i PIa _- Ir M odes} w W M IYg1Ni V 5~ lIb1Y RY/lP YIRIp/M11RdIFA-M[GrtR 9•. CPMIY C! S.w ~RNYY}ND LERIM1 R[MC(R SI.IE R LY(pW.1 P32 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- OJr'7 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 07-8) SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Board of Directors"), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Boundary Map No. 07-8 to Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Boundary Map') showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District (the "Territory"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The Boundary Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of Boundary Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Resolution No. FD 07- Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007. Executed this _ day of 2007 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. P33 Debra J. Adams, Secretary STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCA\40NG9 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: October 17, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: PeterM. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II P34 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: RESOLUTIONOFINTEN1lONTOANNEXTERRffORYT000MMUNITYFAGLr1lESDISTPoCT N0.8~1 RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 07-8 into Community Facilities District No. 85-1, to specify facilities and services to be financed, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed and to set a time and place for a public hearing regarding the annexation. BACKGROUND CalEast Phelan 8th & Vineyard, LLC (SUBTPM18794) is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts. In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving a boundary map of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Annex. The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth: (a) the District's intention to annex; (b) the facilities and services which the annexed property will, in part, finance (Exhibit "A" of said Resolution) through the levy of the special tax on the annexed property; (d) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (Exhibit "B" of said Resolution); (e) the date, time and location of the public hearing set for December 5, 2007, and (f) election requirements. Warren Diven, Special Counsel for the District, has worked with staff to establish the annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions. The resolution is considered to be P35 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX OCTOBER 17, ?007 PAGE 2 routine and non-controversial, as the developer is in support of the annexation procedure. On December 5, 2007, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter. Respec ully submitted, ~~ Peter M. Bryan/ Fire Chief Attachment P36 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- Q.SS RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 07-8) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, ("Board of Directors"), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). The Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain real property to the District (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 07-8 to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Boundary Map") showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, which map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex the Territory to District, to describe the territory included within District and the Territory proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the Territory to finance such services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: RECITALS SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. LEGAL AUTHORITY SECTION 2: These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors pursuant to the authorization of the Act. INTENTION TO ANNEX: DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORY AND THE DISTRICT SECTION 3. This legislative body hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District. A description of the Territory is as follows: P37 Resolution No. 07- Page -2- All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is shown on the Boundary Map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. A general description of the territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows: All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on maps of the original District and the territories subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the name of the original District. Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the County Recorder. SERVICES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT SECTION 4: The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District (the "Services") are generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide the Services. The Services authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within District are the types of services to be provided in the Territory. If and to the extent possible the Services shall be provided in common within the District and the Territory. P38 Resolution No. 07- Page -3- SPECIAL TAXES SECTION 5: It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay forthe Services and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit B (the "Special Tax Formula"), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which sets forth insufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied to pay for the Services in the District, except that a higher or lower special tax maybe levied within the Territoryto the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services in the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services in the original District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the Special Tax Formula. The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. ' Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases. The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territoryto the District. P39 Resolution No. 07- Page -4- PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 6: NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 5th DAY OF DECEMBER 2007, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED METHOD AND APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL BE HEARD. AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, PROTESTS AGAINST THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORYORANYOTHER PROPOSALS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION MAY BE MADE ORALLY BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON. ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. P40 Resolution No. 07- Page -5- MAJORITY PROTEST SECTION 7: If (a) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the District, (b) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the Territory, (c) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the District, or (d)owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the Territory, file written protests against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing. ELECTION SECTION 8: Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, if the legislative body determines to proceed with the annexation, a proposition shall be submitted to the qualifed electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory. NOTICE SECTION 9: Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the Secretary by publication in a legally designated newspaper of general circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the Act. P41 Resolution No. 07- Page -6- PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Debra H. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007. Executed this day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J. Adams, Secretary P42 Resolution No. 07- Page -7- EXHIBIT 'A' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. P43 Resolution No. 07- Page -8- EXHIBIT 'B' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 07-8 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 07-8 for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($143.31) Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($143.31) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($143.31) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($143.31) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($143.31) + {.35 (TU-4) ($143.31)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($143.31) + {.30 (TU-14) ($143.31)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($143.31) + {.25 (TU-30) ($143.31)} 81 - up DU: 23.15 = ($143.31) + {.20 (TU-80) ($143.31)} Commercial ($143.31) per acre + $.078 per SF Industrial ($143.31) per acre + $.095 per SF Note: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2007 and each July 1s` thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or {b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defned in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. P44 Resolution No. 07- Page -g- REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; - where a "certificate of occupancy" or "utility release" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; - which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services -Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAbIONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: October 17, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II P45 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ALDER CREEK,LLC-SUBTT17769-SPECIALELECl10N RESULTS PERTAINING TO ANNEXATION NO.07-7 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 07-7 (a proposal to subdivide 2.75 acres into 11 lots at Beryl Ave. & 19`" St.). BACKGROUND On August 15, 2007, the Board declared its intention to annex SUBTT17769 into CFD No. 85-1. On September 19, 2007, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and called for a special election. A special election was scheduled for September 26, 2007, after the adoption of the resolution declaring the annexation. On September 26, 2007, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary. The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution). The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexed Territory. Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien. By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexed Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property. Respectful y submitted, Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief Attachment P46 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- OSlO A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 07-7 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 07-7 ("Annexed Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexed Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexed Territory; and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/8's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes case in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. SECTION 4. The Board hereby further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexed Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexed Territory. SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. P47 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M. D., President ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2007. Executed this _ day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, Secretary P48 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 07-7 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection District held on September 26, 2007 I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes case in said District, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure in said District, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct. I. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: II. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A AGAINST WITNESS my hand and official Seal this day ofs, 2007. Election Of 'al Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District State of California STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Date: October 17, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services By: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD A CON' P49 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAINTENANCE, POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND FIRE DISTRICT, THROUGH A RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Directors of the Fire Board approval to award a contract for the purchase of gasoline and diesel fuel from Southern Counties Oil CO., LTD (SC Fuels) for Fleet Maintenance, Police Department, and Fire District, through a competitive bid process, in annual amounts as per adopted budget, fund by account numbers 1001317-5255 (Fleet), 1001317-5256 (Fleet), 1001701- 5255 (Police Department), 3281-527-5255 (Fire District), and 3281527-5256 (Fire District), and approval to award an additional 10% contingency to each account for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2007/08, with an option to renew upon mutual consent for additional one (1 )year periods, up to a total of three (3) years BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Purchasing determined it was time to review the current procurements for gasoline and diesel fuels. Specifications and estimated annual volumes were provided by Engineering's Fleet Division and the Fire Protection District. The bid solicitation began on June 11, 2007 and was sent to six (6) vendors in which four (4) responses were received. After careful analysis of each bid response, Southern Counties Oil CO., LTD (SC Fuels) was able to offer the City of Rancho Cucamonga the lowest, most responsive, responsible bid. The Purchasing Division will again review any additional opportunities on a fiscal year basis before renewal of the fuel contract. RR ecCmitted, John Gillison Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services 5256 (FIRE DISTRICTI. AND APPROVAL TO AWARD AN ADDITIONAL 10% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257843 9/26/2007 A&L THE TUB COMPANY 34.05 AP - 00257844 9/26/2007 A&V SOFTBALL 2,507.00 AP - 00257845 9/26/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7.76 AP - 00257845 9/26/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 72.73 AP - 00257846 9/26/2007 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00257847 9/26/2007 ABLARD, SARAH 120.00 AP - 00257848 9/26/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 49,162.11 AP - 00257849 9/26/2007 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW 35.00 AP - 00257849 9/26/2007 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW 25.86 AP - 00257850 9/26/2007 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 65.00 AP - 00257850 9/26/2007 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2,726.08 AP - 00257850 9/26/2007 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 825.00 AP - 00257851 9/26/2007 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 20.16 AP - 00257852 9/26/2007 ADVANCED BATH SYSTEMS 22.25 AP - 00257853 9/26/2007 ADVANCED ENGINEERING ACOUSTICS 1,600.00 AP - 00257854 9/26/2007 AIR COMPONENTS INC. 15.60 AP - 00257855 9/26/2007 ALL CARE PLAZA 30.00 AP - 00257856 9/26/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 1,766.56 AP - 00257856 9/26/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 1,925.84 AP - 00257857 9/26/2007 ALLIE-UP MOON BOUNCER 30.65 AP - 00257858 9/26/2007 ALOHA BATTERIES 615.00 AP - 00257859 9/26/2007 ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES 24.97 AP - 00257860 9/26/2007 ALTEK MEDIA GROUP, THE 14.25 AP - 00257861 9/26/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 254.08 AP - 00257862 9/26/2007 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 2,641.00 AP - 00257864 9/26/2007 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 10,584.92 AP - 00257867 9/26/2007 ASSI SECURITY 125.00 AP - 00257867 9/26/2007 ASSI SECURITY 2,000.00 AP - 00257867 9/26/2007 ASSI SECURITY 1,375.00 AP - 00257867 9/26/2007 ASSI SECURITY 865.00 AP - 00257867 9/26/2007 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00257867 9/26/2007 ASSI SECURITY 1,197.50 AP - 00257867 9/26/2007 ASSI SECURITY 1,375.00 AP - 00257868 9/26/2007 ATKT LONG DISTANCE 1,289.54 AP - 00257868 9/26/2007 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 1,336.51 AP - 00257869 9/26/2007 AUFBAU CORPORATION 15,960.00 AP - 00257869 9/26/2007 AUFBAU CORPORATION 8,216.00 AP - 00257870 9/26/2007 AVANTS, MARGE 60.00 AP - 00257870 9/26/2007 AVANTS, MARGE 60.00 AP - 00257871 9/26/2007 AVID MICROSHIP ID SYSTEM 10,083.63 AP - 00257872 9/26/2007 AYSO REGION 65 200.00 AP - 00257873 9/26/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 108.28 AP - 00257873 9/26/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 169.62 AP - 00257873 9/26/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 256.90 AP - 00257873 9/26/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 65.72 AP - 00257873 9/26/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 170.68 AP - 00257874 9/26/2007 BEACON PLUMBING 415.84 AP - 00257874 9/26/2007 BEACON PLUMBING 476.37 AP - 00257875 9/26/2007 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 8,120.00 AP - 00257875 9/26/2007 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 4;735.00 AP - 00257877 9/26/2007 BREAUX, RAYMOND 10.00 AP - 00257878 9/26/2007 BUILDING ELECTRONIC CONTROLS INC 562.30 AP - 00257879 9/26/2007 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 66.75 AP - 00257880 9/26/2007 CALBO 4,850.00 P50 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P5y Aeenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257882 9/26/2007 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 95,801.68 AP - 00257883 9/26/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 58.75 AP - 00257883 9/26/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 144.51 AP - 00257883 9/26/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 288.42 AP - 00257884 9/26/2007 CALZADA, CHRIS 52.00 AP - 00257885 9/26/2007 CAMILERI, LINDA 15.00 AP - 00257887 9/26/2007 CAPUTQ GARY 36.00 AP - 00257888 9/26/2007 CDW-G 4,995.42 AP - 00257888 9/26/2007 CDW-G 1,315.80 AP - 00257889 9/26/2007 CENTEX HOMES 5,050.00 AP - 00257890 9/26/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 41,935.98 AP - 00257890 9/26/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 23,320.15 AP - 00257891 9/26/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 24,545.32 AP - 00257891 9/26/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 9,389.43 AP - 00257891 9/26/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 212.74 AP - 00257892 9/26/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 15,215.00 AP - 00257893 9/26/2007 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00257894 9/26/2007 CLIFFORD, YVONNE 250.00 AP - 00257895 9/26/2007 COLLETTE VACATIONS 7,904.40 AP - 00257896 9/26/2007 COOPER, CHERYL 135.00 AP - 00257896 9/26/2007 COOPER, CHERYL 9.00 AP - 00257897 9/26/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 72.49 AP - 00257897 9/26/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 36.24 AP - 00257897 9/26/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 36.25 AP - 00257898 9/26/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00257898 9/26/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00257898 9/26/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00257898 9/26/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 146.69 AP - 00257898 9/26/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 284.48 AP - 00257895 9/26/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 355.60 AP - 00257899 9/26/2007 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 375.00 AP - 00257900 9/26/2007 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 700.00 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,880.98 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 724.97 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 379.66 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,467.87 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 209.04 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.45 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.96 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,655.80 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,194.95 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 274.59 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,139.99 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.08 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,659.12 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 160.94 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 599.11 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 817.25 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 305.54 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 983.05 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,020.72 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 322.47 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 704.18 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 677.15 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check Reeister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,143.98 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,879.84 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.99 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 963.10 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 251.98 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 7,796.07 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 315.82 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,528.94 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,141.75 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,465.10 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 408.92 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,593.95 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18,831.00 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 792.44 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,168.37 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 248.89 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 7,524.74 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.86 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.07 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 394.29 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,117.97 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,482.23 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,131.27 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 238.25 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.45 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 305.54 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.54 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.20 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.45 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,680.56 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 837.18 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 932.94 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.75 AP - 00257902 9/26/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 737.43 AP - 00257903 9/26/2007 D & D DISPOSAL INC. 400.00 AP - 00257904 9/26/2007 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 673.44 AP - 00257905 9/26/2007 DELGADILLQ, EATHER 33.00 AP - 00257906 9/26/2007 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,501.05 AP - 00257907 9/26/2007 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 22,834.86 AP - 00257908 9/26/2007 DURAN, MICHELLE 88.00 AP - 00257909 9/26/2007 EASTER, PAMELA 75.70 AP - 00257910 9/26/2007 ESGIL CORPORATION 24,767.68 AP - 00257911 9/26/2007 EXTREME ANIMAL NUTRITION 290.36 AP - 00257911 9/26/2007 EXTREME ANIMAL NUTRITION -280.34 AP - 00257912 9/26/2007 FARRAR, ALICE 200.00 AP - 00257913 9/26/2007 FERIA, MARIA 46.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 376.35 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 930.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 745.50 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00 AP - 002579 ]4 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 930.00 P52 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P53 Agenda Check Reeister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 802.90 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 348.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 640.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 640.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 440.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 640.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 12.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 198.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 640.00 AP - 00257914 9/26/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 475.38 AP - 00257915 9/26/2007 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 2,000.00 AP - 00257916 9/26/2007 FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER 57.06 AP - 00257918 9/26/2007 FOREST CITY 616.13 AP - 00257919 9/26/2007 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH ],897.50 AP - 00257921 9/26/2007 GAGLIARDI, JOSEPH 1,000.00 AP - 00257922 9G26/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 484.88 AP - 00257923 9/26/2007 GIBBYS FENCING MATERIALS 4,875.00 AP - 00257924 9/26/2007 GILKEY, JOHN 400.00 AP - 00257925 9/26/2007 GOLDEN STATE FIRE PROTECTION 980.00 AP - 00257926 9/26/2007 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00 AP - 00257927 9/26/2007 GONZALEZ, CECILIA 36.00 AP - 00257928 9/26/2007 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 132,275.00 AP - 00257928 9/26/2007 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC -14,064.50 AP - 00257928 9/26/2007 GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 140,645.00 AP - 00257929 9/26/2007 GRAPHNET 58.50 AP - 00257929 9/26/2007 GRAPHNET 54.50 AP - 00257930 9/26/2007 GTSI CORP 9,166.68 AP - 00257932 9/26/2007 HADDON, DAWN 110.58 AP - 00257932 9/26/2007 HADDON, DAWN 242.64 AP - 00257933 9/26/2007 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 200.00 AP - 00257934 9/26/2007 HAMMOND, MYCAH 500.00 AP - 00257935 9/26/2007 HARTFIELD, FRANCESCA 60.00 AP - 00257936 9/26/2007 HAYES, KATHY 500.00 AP - 00257937 9/26/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 21.61 AP - 00257937 9/26/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 57.23 AP - 00257940 9/26/2007 HOANG, TRUC 75.00 AP - 00257941 9/26/2007 HODGIN, LANCE E 5,000.00 AP - 00257942 9/26/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 477.88 AP - 00257942 9/26/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC ] 68.63 AP - 00257942 9/26/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00257942 9/26/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,011.24 AP - 00257942 9/26/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,176.10 AP - 00257943 9/26/2007 HOSE MAN INC 26.80 AP - 00257944 9/26/2007 HUANG, PRUDENCE 750.00 AP - 00257945 9/26/2007 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 1.095.00 AP - 00257946 9/26/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 4.01 AP - 00257947 9/26/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 253.35 AP - 00257947 9/26/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 40.00 AP - 00257947 9/26/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 257.92 AP - 00257947 9/26/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 327.01 AP - 00257947 9/26/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 48.36 AP - 00257947 9/26/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC _ 12.25 AP - 00257947 9/26/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 61.58 AP - 00257948 9/26/2007 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 212.81 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA P54 Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00257948 9/26/2007 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 504.89 AP - 00257949 9/26/2007 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIC 591.40 AP - 00257950 9/26/2007 INLAND DIRECT 270.00 AP - 0025795 I 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 184.80 AP - 0025795 I 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN -7.70 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 126.25 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 166.25 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 341.25 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1l 1.25 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 181.25 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 137.50 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 735.00 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 2,183.75 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 2,112.50 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 212.50 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 350.00 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 183.75 AP - 00257952 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 108.75 AP - 00257953 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 47.25 AP - 00257953 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 47.25 AP - 00257953 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 143.26 AP - 00257953 9/26/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 143.26 AP - 00257954 9/26/2007 INSIGHT 4,122.12 AP - 00257954 9/26/2007 INSIGHT 324.69 AP - 00257956 9/26/2007 JALYNSKI, JESSICA 2.00 AP - 00257958 9/26/2007 JOHNSON, CAROLYN 48.00 AP - 00257959 9/26/2007 JONES, ANNA MARIE 36.00 AP - 00257960 9/26/2007 JONES, ROBERT 2,747.50 AP - 00257961 9/26/2007 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 111,056.51 AP - 00257961 9/26/2007 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 930.33 AP - 00257962 9/26/2007 KAMBWA, NISI 66.00 AP - 00257963 9/26/2007 KERNS, PHOEBE 27.00 AP - 00257964 9/26/2007 KLAUS AND SONS 6,450.00 AP - 00257964 9/26/2007 KLAUS AND SONS 8,250.00 AP - 00257966 9/26/2007 KNIGHT, JENNIFER 65.00 AP - 00257967 9/26/2007 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 5,800.00 AP - 00257968 9/26/2007 KROGER 844.34 AP - 00257969 9/26/2007 LASTING IMAGES LANDSCAPE 56,237.26 AP - 00257969 9/26/2007 LASTING IMAGES LANDSCAPE -5,623.73 AP - 00257971 9/26/2007 LEE, GEORGE 100.00 AP - 00257972 9/26/2007 LEE, SUSIE 81.00 AP - 00257973 9/26/2007 LEGORRETA, BRENDA 81.00 AP - 00257974 9/26/2007 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 371.50 AP - 00257974 9/26/2007 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,313.00 AP - 00257974 9/26/2007 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 268.00 AP - 00257975 9/26/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 600.00 AP - 00257975 9/26/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 400.00 AP - 00257975 9/26/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 AP - 00257975 9/26/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 550.00 AP - 00257976 9/26/2007 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 860.21 AP - 00257977 9/26/2007 MANSOURl, IRAJ 4,890.00 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC ],930.05 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,022.47 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,181.84 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: ]0/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 587.54 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 103.80 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 904.94 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 327.17 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 556.64 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 201.76 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,092.35 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 551.86 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 870.74 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,059.08 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,578.73 AP - 00257978 9/26/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 15,998.12 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 812.66 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 578.05 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 235.00 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 341.00 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -85.25 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -58.75 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -144.51 AP - 00257979 9/26/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -203.17 AP - 00257980 9/26/2007 MARTINEZ, ILEIDIS 40.00 AP - 00257981 9/26/2007 MCI 475.26 AP - 00257982 9/26/2007 MCMILLAN, CHRISTINA 70.00 AP - 00257983 9/26/2007 MEZA VIDEO PRODUCTIONS 21.40 AP - 00257984 9/26/2007 MIGLIACCI, THERESA 120.00 AP - 00257985 9/26/2007 MOUNTAIN MOTOR SPORTS 129.14 AP - 00257986 9/26/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 196.54 AP - 00257987 9/26/2007 MSA 07 20.00 AP - 00257988 9/26/2007 N I G P 330.00 AP - 00257990 9/26/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 32,891.94 AP - 00257991 9/26/2007 NATURES EARTH PRODUCTS INC 1,256.37 AP - 00257993 9/26/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 1,352.75 AP - 00257993 9/26/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 648.89 AP - 00257993 9/26/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 4,475.75 AP - 00257993 9/26/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 460.00 AP - 00257993 9/26/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 880.57 AP - 00257993 9/26/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 3,2]2.35 AP - 00257994 9/26/2007 NELSON AND SIXTA 1,700.00 AP - 00257996 9/26/2007 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 278.32 AP - 00257997 9/26/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 18722 AP - 00257997 9/26/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 374.00 AP - 00257997 9/26/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 1,696.00 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 3.16 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 15.47 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 54.33 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 75.35 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -169.75 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 97.83 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 125.90 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 406.29 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 416.60 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 23.26 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 6.36 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 31.58 P55 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 21.00 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 39.29 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -45.92 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 562.61 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT ' 14.60 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 7.91 AP - 00257998 9/26/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 54.25 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 326.34 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 810.23 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 768.85 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 1,186.06 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 389.37 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 34.82 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 229.45 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 255.37 AP - 00257999 9/26/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 91.71 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.54 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 48.55 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 121.57 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 46.49 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 49.52 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 107.72 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 32.29 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 268.53 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 18.06 AP - 00258000 9/26/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.54 AP - 00258001 9/26/2007 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,650.05 AP - 00258002 9/26/2007 OTT, LAURA 492.00 AP - 00258002 9/26/2007 OTT, LAURA 112.25 AP - 00258002 9/26/2007 OTT, LAURA 228.00 AP - 00258002 9/26/2007 OTT, LAURA 72.00 AP - 00258003 9/26/2007 OTT, SHARON 84.00 AP - 00258003 9/26/2007 OTT, SHARON 192.00 AP - 00258005 9/26/2007 PACIFIC COAST BASEBALL 2,000.00 AP - 00258005 9/26/2007 PACIFIC COAST BASEBALL 587.00 AP - 00258006 9/26/2007 PACIFIC MASONRY INC 307.51 AP - 00258007 9/26/2007 PARADISE MANUFACTURING CO 291.52 AP - 00258008 9/26/2007 PARK, HOYOUNG 100.00 AP - 00258009 9/26/2007 PARS 3,500.00 AP - 00258010 9/26/2007 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 21.00 AP - 00258011 9/26/2007 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1,129.30 AP - 00258012 9/26/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 300.00 AP - 00258014 9/26/2007 PLATT, BRIAN 71.65 AP - 00258015 9/26/2007 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 120.00 AP - 00258016 9/26/2007 PORTER, TEMPLE 81.00 AP - 00258017 9/26/2007 POSTER SOLUTIONS 110.00 AP - 00258017 9/26/2007 POSTER SOLUTIONS 23.62 AP - 00258018 9/26/2007 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 1,425,207.88 AP - 00258018 9/26/2007 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -142,520.79 AP - 00258019 9/26/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 34.20 AP - 00258020 9/26/2007 QWEST 5.97 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 P56 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26!2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP - 00258021 9/26/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP - 00258022 9/26/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 51.76 AP - 00258025 9/26/2007 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 20.47 AP - 00258026 9/26/2007 RCPFA 7,508.74 AP - 00258027 9/26/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 151.35 AP - 00258027 9/26/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 162.13 AP - 00258027 9/26/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 146.53 AP - 00258027 9/26/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 146.53 AP - 00258029 9/26/2007 RICHLAND INVESTMENTS 3,075.00 AP - 00258030 9/26/2007 RIGS, ARACELI 55.00 AP - 00258031 9/26/2007 RMA GROUP 2,152.50 AP - 00258032 9/26/2007 ROAD WORKS INC 100.00 AP - 00258032 9/26/2007 ROAD WORKS INC 100.00 AP - 00258032 9/26/2007 ROAD WORKS INC 100.00 AP - 00258032 9/26/2007 ROAD WORKS INC 100.00 AP - 00258032 9/26/2007 ROAD WORKS INC 100.00 AP - 00258033 9/26/2007 ROLL OUT TRANSPORTATION 15.40 AP - 00258034 9/26/2007 RUIZ, ERNEST R 446.55 AP - 00258035 9/26/2007 SABBAH, JACKLINE 200.00 AP - 00258037 9/26/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 67,388.00 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 87.50 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 25.00 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 122.50 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 143.50 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 203.00 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 58.00 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 41.00 AP - 00258039 9/26/2007 SENECHAL, CALVIN 35.00 AP - 00258040 9/26/2007 SERRANO, REBECCA 60.00 AP - 00258041 9/26/2007 SIGN SHOP, THE 462.84 AP - 00258042 9/26/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 21,764.49 AP - 00258042 9/26/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 30,268.34 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,687.69 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,345.79 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 638.91 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 73.91 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 740.82 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 30.08 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 56.22 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 424.82 AP - 00258043 9/26/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 476.97 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.73 AP - 00258048 9/26!2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.04 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,033.28 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1632 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 P57 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report: CK_AGENDA . REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P58 Aeenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 196.26 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.03 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.15 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.31 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.27 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.24 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.20 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.52 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.24 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.69 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.22 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.51 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.47 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.82 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.28 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.77 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.20 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.92 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.13 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.17 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.47 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.05 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.90 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.03 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.25 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON IS.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.22 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.22 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.44 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.57 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.22 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.28 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.15 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.86 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.60 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.05 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.12 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.15 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.26 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.66 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.28 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.15 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.94 AP -00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.37 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 177.43 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 238.26 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.13 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.82 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.67 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.71 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.08 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.05 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.15 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.79 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.66 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.26 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.14 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.42 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.92 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.79 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.83 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.40 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.68 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 P59 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>?ister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.83 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 15.52 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.91 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.10 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.11 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.40 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.74 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 193.06 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 344.50 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.79 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.64 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.24 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.72 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.71 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 174.13 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.66 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 177.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.72 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.61 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.83 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.52 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.56 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.31 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.19 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.36 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,398.01 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.22 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.20 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 P60 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Dale: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P61 Agenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.16 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.44 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.15 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.92 AP - 00258048 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.43 AP - 00258049 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,103.11 AP - 00258050 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,119.77 AP - 00258050 9/26/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,971.93 AP - 00258052 9/26/2007 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 207.00 AP - 00258053 9/26/2007 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 5,834.71 AP - 00258053 9/26/2007 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 3,998.22 AP - 00258053 9/26/2007 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 3.89 AP - 00258054 9/26/2007 SPADONI, XUAN 18.00 AP - 00258055 9/26/2007 STERICYCLE INC 237.87 AP - 00258056 9/26/2007 STEVENS, NARIA 60.00 AP - 00258057 9/26/2007 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 130.02 AP - 00258057 9/26/2007 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 40.00 AP - 00258058 9/26/2007 STOVER SEED COMPANY 2,225.88 AP - 00258058 9/26/2007 STOVER SEED COMPANY 3,000.00 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 233,201.52 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 419,359.80 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 245,453.15 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 2,127.43 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -23,320.15 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -41,935.98 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 93,894.29 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -212.74 , AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -9,389.43 AP - 00258059 9/26/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -24,545.32 AP - 00258060 9/26/2007 T MOBILE 231.88 AP - 00258061 9/26/2007 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 1,105.53 AP-00258062 9/26/2007 TELEWORKS 1,941.38 AP - 00258064 9/26/2007 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 507.50 AP - 00258065 9/26/2007 THOMSON GALE -] 09.91 AP - 00258065 9/26/2007 THOMSON GALE 27.44 AP - 00258065 9/26/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27 AP - 00258065 9/26/2007 THOMSON GALE 206.55 AP - 00258065 9/26/2007 THOMSON GALE 54.08 AP - 00258065 9/26/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27 AP - 00258065 9/26/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27 AP - 00258066 9/26/2007 TICKETS COM INC 883.55 AP - 00258067 9/26/2007 TJ'S FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES INC 663.74 AP - 00258068 9/26/2007 TOMARK SPORTS INC 86.19 AP - 00258069 9/26/2007 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 9,001.26 AP - 00258070 9/26/2007 TRIMARK PACIFIC RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC 3,550.00 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 27,156.75 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 496.54 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 57.34 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,001.04 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,669.17 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEA' LANDCARE 3,421.36 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,014.07 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,162.00 AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 21,521.30 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62 Asenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258071 9/26/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 78,145.90 AP - 00258072 9/26/2007 TYPECARE SS.00 AP - 00258073 9/26/2007 UAP DISTRIBUTION INC 297.43 AP - 002S807S 9/26/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRU STEE FOR P. 2,582.64 AP - 00258076 9/26/2007 UNITED WAY 11.00 AP - 00258077 9/26/2007 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC ] 1,871.58 AP - 00258077 9/26/2007 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 1,225.12 AP - 00258078 9/26/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 8,175.99 AP - 00258078 9/26/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL S.SO AP - 00258078 9/26/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL -lOS.8S AP - 00258078 9/26/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL -110.20 AP - 00258078 9/26/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 199.69 AP - 00258080 9/26/2007 VAN DOREN, JOHN SS.00 AP - 00258081 9/26/2007 VASQUEZ, LESLIE 180.00 AP - 00258081 9/26/2007 VASQUEZ, LESLIE ]08.00 AP - 00258082 9/26/2007 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,773.95 AP - 00258083 9/26/2007 VERA, CARA 25.83 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 86.44 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 77.11 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 47.82 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 640.15 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 6S.OS AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 1S6.S3 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 44.65 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 68.60 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON S1.S4 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 19.57 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 100.70 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 41.33 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 110.52 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 462.06 AP - 00258084 9/26/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 002S808S 9/26/2007 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 247.83 AP - 00258086 9/26/2007 VISTA PAINT 1,032.66 AP - 00258087 9/26/2007 VOSS, MARY 23.70 AP - 00258087 9/26/2007 VOSS, MARY 19.37 AP - 00258087 9/26/2007 VOSS, MARY 250.00 AP - 00258087 9/26/2007 VOSS, MARY 29.20 AP - 00258087 9/26/2007 VOSS, MARY 34.64 AP - 00258087 9/26/2007 VOSS, MARY 7.59 AP - 00258087 9/26/2007 VOSS, MARY 20.00 AP - 00258090 9/26/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 99.67 AP - 00258090 9/26/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 102.58 AP - 00258090 9/26/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 65.27 AP - 00258090 9/26/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 159.16 AP - 00258090 9/26/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 377.13 AP - 00258090 9/26/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 98.27 AP - 00258092 9/26/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 307.84 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63 Aeenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amount AP - 00258092 9/26/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 89.58 AP - 00258092 9/26/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 178.50 AP - 00258092 9/26/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 250.28 AP - 00258092 9/26/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 167.13 AP - 00258092 9/26/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 192.71 AP - 00258092 9/26/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 84.56 AP - 00258093 9/26/2007 WASBOTTEN, MICHAEL 450.00 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64.80 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY -42.63 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1.81 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 187.96 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 8.75 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3.62 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 151.67 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 152.36 AP - 00258094 9/26/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 59.89 AP - 00258095 9/26/2007 WEIR, JEWELL 495.00 AP - 00258096 9/26/2007 WELK RESORT, LAWRENCE 2,401.50 AP - 00258097 9/26/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 279.00 AP - 00258098 9/26/2007 WESTCOAST MEDIA 772.50 AP - 00258098 9/26/2007 WESTCOAST MEDIA 772.50 AP - 00258099 9/26/2007 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 603.51 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP-00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 20.00 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP-00258100 9/26/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 30.00 AP - 00258101 9/26/2007 WF CONSTRUCTION 860.00 AP - 00258102 9/26/2007 WHAT YOU EAT CATERING & PERSONAL CHEF 500.98 AP - 00258103 9/26/2007 WHITE, ANA 20.00 AP - 00258104 9/26/2007 WHITE, KRIS 70.00 AP - 00258104 9/26/2007 WHITE, KRIS 70.00 AP - 00258105 9/26/2007 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 398.68 AP - 002S810S 9/26/2007 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 878.16 AP - 002S810S 9/26/2007 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 490.26 AP - 00258106 9/26/2007 WINK, EUNICE 36.00 AP - 00258107 9/26/2007 WOJCIECHOWSKI, BYRON 60.00 AP - 00258109 9/26/2007 XLNT TINT OF ANAHEIM INC 2,584.83 AP - 00258110 9/26/2007 YALE CHASE MATERIALS HANDLIA'G INC 139.73 AP - 002581 ] 1 9/26/2007 YORK INDUSTRIES 592.63 AP - 00258111 9/26/2007 YORK INDUSTRIES 118.53 AP - 00258112 9/26/2007 ZERTUCHE, JENNIFER 64.00 AP - 00258113 9/26/2007 ZIRGES, ARLENE 240.00 AP - 0025811 S 10/3/2007 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 50.00 AP - 00258116 10/3/2007 ABLAC 207.48 AP - 00258117 10/3/2007 ABLETRONICS 80.21 AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 3,200.00 AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 672.SG AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 2,031.79 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:SO:S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64 Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 767.59 AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 744.26 AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,467.94 AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 49,162.11 AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 319.13 AP - 00258118 10/3/2007 ABM JANITORIAL SW 252.52 AP - 00258119 10/3/2007 ACCOUNTEMPS 980.00 AP - 00258119 10/3/2007 ACCOUNTEMPS 980.00 AP - 00258119 10/3/2007 ACCOUNTEMPS -980.00 AP - 00258120 10/3/2007 ACTION AWARDS INC. 62.64 AP - 00258121 10/3/2007 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP. 3,300.00 AP - 00258121 10/3/2007 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP. 3,000.00 AP - 00258122 10/3/2007 AFLAC 4,362.91 AP - 00258124 10/3/2007 ALL WELDING 125.00 AP - 00258126 10/3/2007 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO ] 08.59 AP - 00258127 10/3/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00258127 10/3/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 550.00 AP - 00258127 10/3/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 462.00 AP - 00258128 10/3/2007 ALUZRI, MARDI 52.00 AP - 00258129 10/3/2007 AMERI NATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 280.00 AP - 00258130 10/3/2007 AMERICAN PRECISION 10.00 AP - 00258131 10/3/2007 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION 120.75 AP - 00258131 10/3/2007 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION 89.50 AP - 00258132 10/3/2007 AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBEI 100.00 AP - 00258133 10/3/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 556.99 AP - 00258133 10/3/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 84.69 AP - 00258134 10/3/2007 ANDRADE, LAINI 30.00 AP - 00258136 10/3/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00258136 10/3/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00258137 10/3/2007 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 700.00 AP - 00258137 10/3/2007 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 795.57 AP - 00258138 10/3/2007 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 168.09 AP - 00258139 10/3/2007 ARTS REACH UNLIMITED 667.00 AP - 00258140 10/3/2007 ARTS REACH UNLIMITED 528.00 AP - 00258141 10/3/2007 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 1,748.23 AP - 00258141 10/3/2007 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 993.08 AP - 00258142 10/3/2007 AUTO SPECIALISTS 88.20 AP - 00258142 10/3/2007 AUTO SPECIALISTS 66.82 AP - 00258143 10/3/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 96.72 AP - 00258143 10/3/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 158.02 AP - 00258]43 10/3/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -783.87 AP - 00258143 10/3/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 238.12 AP - 00258143 10/3/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 2,484.26 AP - 00258143 10/3/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 91.43 AP - 00258144 10/3/2007 BABCO GROUP 2,111.40 AP - 00258145 10/3/2007 BAKER, JANA 78.00 AP - 00258146 10/3/2007 BALDEON, CARLOS 266.00 AP - 00258148 10/3/2007 BEARINGS & DRIVES INC. 34.74 AP - 00258149 10/3/2007 BENITES, PILAR 500.00 AP - 00258]50 10/3/2007 BERNARD, JEREMY 1,094.89 AP - 00258151 10/3/2007 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 381.27 AP - 00258151 10/3/2007 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 543.43 AP - 00258151 10/3/2007 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 39.00 AP - 00258151 10/3/2007 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 388.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amount AP - 00258153 10/3/2007 BISHOP COMPANY 209.41 AP - 00258154 10/3/2007 BLUE CROSS 157,736.23 AP - 00258155 10/3/2007 BRADLEY, CHERISH 162.00 AP - 00258156 10/3/2007 BUENHOGAR 36.00 AP - 00258157 10/3/2007 BULLET WAREHOUSE & LOGISTICS INC. 663.13 AP - 00258158 10/3/2007 BURGAN, JEREMY 750.00 AP - 00258159 10/3/2007 BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAIL 332.00 AP - 00258160 10/3/2007 BURNS, CHRIS 90.00 AP - 00258161 10/3/2007 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 400.16 AP - 00258161 10/3/2007 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 197.42 AP - 00258162 10/3/2007 CAL OSHA REPORTER 427.00 AP - 00258163 10/3/2007 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 318.57 AP - 00258164 10/3/2007 CALIFA GROUP 400.00 AP - 00258165 10/3/2007 CALIFORNIA DELTA MECHANICAL 85.98 AP - 00258166 10/3/2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 306.00 AP - 00258167 10/3/2007 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 219.31 AP - 00258168 10/3/2007 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 372.03 AP - 00258169 10/3/2007 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 00258170 10/3/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 150.59 AP - 00258171 10/3/2007 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03 AP - 00258171 10/3/2007 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03 AP - 00258173 10/3/2007 CASTAWAY POOLS AND CONSTRUCTION INC 1,000.00 AP - 00258175 10/3/2007 CCPOA 30.00 AP - 00258176 10/3/2007 CERTIFIED TOWING 75.00 AP - 00258177 10/3/2007 CHAMPLIN, TRISH 100.00 AP - 00258177 10/3/2007 CHAMPLIN, TRISH 228.00 AP - 00258178 10/3/2007 CHASE BACK BAY LLC 15.000.00 AP - 00258179 10/3/2007 CHASE EL MONTE LLC 15,000.00 AP - 00258182 10/3/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 56,386.44 AP - 00258182 10/3/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 7,334.25 AP - 00258183 10/3/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 31,830.96 AP - 00258183 10/3/2007 CITY NATIONAL BANK 4,140.29 AP - 00258184 10/3/2007 CITY RENTALS 108.90 AP - 00258185 10/3/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 105.00 AP - 00258186 10/3/2007 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 63.03 AP - 00258186 10/3/2007 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 63.04 AP - 00258187 10/3/2007 CLOUD, DON 750.00 AP - 00258188 10/3/2007 CLUFF, MICHAEL 82.50 AP - 00258189 10/3/2007 COLLETTE, PETE 15.00 AP - 00258191 10/3/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 165.69 AP - 00258191 10/3/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75 AP - 00258191 10/3/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75 AP - 00258192 10/3/2007 CORPLOGOWARE LLC 635.00 AP - 00258192 10/3/2007 CORPLOGOWARE LLC 52.30 AP - 00258193 10/3/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 533.40 AP - 00258193 10/3/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 13.34 AP - 00258193 10/3/2007 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 177.80 AP - 00258194 10/3/2007 CPRS DISTRICT XI 315.00 AP - 00258195 10/3/2007 CPRS 45.00 AP - 00258196 10/3/2007 CREATIVE PROMOTIONAL IDEAS 2,320.83 AP - 00258196 10/3/2007 CREATIVE PROMOTIONAL IDEAS 955.03 AP - 00258196 10/3/2007 CREATIVE PROMOTIONAL IDEAS 294.13 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.71 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 314.06 P65 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.77 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5,600.23 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,811.84 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,848.48 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,812.19 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,811.84 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.66 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 598.93 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,066.84 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 509.82 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,869.60 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 300.76 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,096.98 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.27 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.55 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 577.40 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.97 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 601.34 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 299.43 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 387.46 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 696.02 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 412.73 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 245.15 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 923.20 AP - 00258197 ] 0/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.31 AP - 00258197 ] 0/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,895.20 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,867.87 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 774.24 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.11 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 294.11 AP - 00258197 10/3/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00258198 10/3/2007 CUTHBERTSON, KRISTA 40.00 AP - 00258199 10/3/2007 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 1,260.83 AP - 00258199 10/3/2007 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 833.99 AP - 00258200 10/3/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 5,000.00 AP - 00258200 ] 0/3/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 7,500.00 AP - 00258200 10/3/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 9,120.00 AP - 00258200 10/3/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 740.00 AP - 00258201 10/3/2007 DANG, KIM 16.00 AP - 00258202 10/3/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 198.55 AP - 00258202 10/3/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 198.55 AP - 00258202 10/3/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 4,042.07 AP - 00258203 10/3/2007 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 13,000.00 AP - 00258204 10/3/2007 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 133.20 AP - 00258205 10/3/2007 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00258206 10/3/2007 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00 AP - 00258207 10/3/2007 DMJM HARRIS 17,027.67 AP - 00258208 10/3/2007 DOWNTOWN FORD 50,354.25 AP - 00258209 10/3/2007 DUBER, SHELLEY 250.00 AP - 00258210 10/3/2007 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 112.50 AP - 00258211 10/3/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 164.28 AP - 0025821 I 10/3/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 300.00 P66 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P67 Agenda Check RePister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258211 10/3/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION ]44.27 AP - 00258211 10/3/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 282.74 AP - 00258211 10/3/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 156.46 AP - 00258212 ]0/3/2007 EDFUND 65.08 . AP - 00258213 10/3/2007 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 196.11 AP - 00258214 10/3/2007 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE 14.45 AP - 00258215 10/3/2007 ELLIOTT, EMORY 500.00 AP - 00258216 ] 0/3/2007 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 6,317.99 AP - 00258218 10/3/2007 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,125.00 AP - 00258219 10/3/2007 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 9,160.00 AP - 00258220 10/3/2007 ENDICOTT, BOB 25.00 AP - 00258221 10/3/2007 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 20.9.84 AP - 00258222 10/3/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 160.33 AP - 00258222 10/3/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 731.33 AP - 00258222 10/3/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 444.44 AP - 00258223 10/3/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 27.65 AP - 00258223 10/3/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 43.31 AP - 00258223 10/3/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 111.24 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.55 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 17.86 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP ] 7.93 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.99 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.86 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.97 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.13 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 13.22 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 13.22 AP - 00258224 10/3/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 20.38 AP - 00258225 10/3/2007 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 120.00 AP - 00258226 10/3/2007 FIEDLER & ASSOC., FRED 7,070.00 AP - 00258227 10/3/2007 FIEDLER, MARK 10.00 AP - 00258228 10/3/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 880.00 AP - 00258228 10/3/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 332.10 AP - 00258228 10/3/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 640.00 AP - 00258231 10/3/2007 FLEET STAR INC. 671.09 AP - 00258231 10/3/2007 FLEET STAR INC. 635.13 AP - 00258231 10/3/2007 FLEET STAR INC. 1,169.03 AP - 00258232 10/3/2007 FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL INC 5.00 AP - 00258233 10/3/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 88.44 AP - 00258233 10/3/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 17.13 AP - 00258233 10/3/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 69.99 AP - 00258233 10/3/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 74.64 AP - 00258234 10/3/2007 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 1,031.30 AP - 00258235 10/3/2007 FRANK CONSTRUCTION, JOHN M 1,000.00 AP - 00258237 10/3/2007 FRIENDLY, LISA 150.00 AP - 00258239 10/3/2007 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 11,600.00 AP - 00258240 10/3/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 20,595.55 AP - 00258242 10/3/2007 GAPPCO LLC 31,700.00 AP - 00258243 10/3/2007 GARCIA, DOMINIC 230.00 AP - 00258243 10/3/2007 GARCIA, DOMINIC 300.00 AP - 00258244 10/3/2007 GARCIA, GRACE 60.00 AP - 002S824S 10/3/2007 GATEWAY FUNDRAISING SERVICE 6.00 AP - 00258246 10/3/2007 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,159.79 AP - 00258247 10/3/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 1,560.76 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00258247 10/3/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 2,130.22 AP - 00258247 10/3/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 434.23 AP - 00258247 10/3/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 350.00 AP - 00258247 10/3/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 1,120.00 AP - 00258247 10/3/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 400.00 AP - 00258248 10/3/2007 GLOBAL SUPER MART 60.00 AP - 00258249 10/3/2007 GOLDEN WEST OIL INC 175.00 AP - 00258250 10/3/2007 GOVPLACE 4,327.00 AP - 00258251 10/3/2007 GRADY, MERRILL 225.00 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 112.36 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 494.56 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 629.99 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 162.79 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 336.35 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 97.85 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 1,713.55 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 740.26 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER 296.09 AP - 00258252 10/3/2007 GRAINGER -4,344.48 AP - 00258253 10/3/2007 GRANITE CREEK CHURCH 1,000.00 AP - 00258255 10/3/2007 GRAY, KELLIE 72.00 AP - 00258256 10/3/2007 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 246.79 AP - 00258257 10/3/2007 GROSS, GEOFF 750.00 AP - 00258258 10/3/2007 GUARDIAN 3,512.27 AP - 00258259 10/3/2007 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 172.85 AP - 00258259 10/3/2007 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 687.77 AP - 00258259 10/3/2007 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 505.46 AP - 00258259 10/3/2007 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 813.66 AP - 00258260 10/3/2007 HAMILTON, JOSHUA 64.00 AP - 00258261 10/3/2007 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY -28.00 AP - 00258261 10/3/2007 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 628.35 AP - 00258262 10/3/2007 HARPER, ANDREA 464.00 AP - 00258263 10/3/2007 HARTLEB, IRENE 46.00 AP - 00258264 10/3/2007 HAYES, LONN 750.00 AP - 00258265 10/3/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 38.75 AP - 00258266 10/3/2007 HENLEY, LISA 29.83 AP - 00258267 10/3/2007 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,427.69 AP - 00258268 10/3/2007 HIGGINS, CRAIG 175.00 AP - 00258270 10(3/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 104.68 AP - 00258270 10/3/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 29.87 AP - 00258270 10/3/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 103.11 AP - 00258271 10/3/2007 HIRED GUN EXTERMINATING INC 3,390.00 AP - 00258272 10/3/2007 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 43.04 AP - 00258273 10/3/2007 HOSE MAN INC 81.94 AP - 00258274 10/3/2007 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 86.71 AP - 00258276 10/3/2007 HUERTA, GUSTAVO 23.00 AP - 00258277 10/3/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 400.00 AP - 00258277 10/3/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 410.00 AP - 00258278 10/3/2007 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 1,323.77 AP - 00258278 10/3/2007 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 282.32 AP - 00258279 10/3/2007 IBM CORPORATION 356.72 AP - 00258280 10/3/2007 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1,964.00 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 316.89 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 316.89 P68 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69 Agenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 335.79 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 316.89 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258282 ] 0/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60 AP - 00258282 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 316.89 AP - 00258283 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 101.00 AP - 00258283 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 124.00 AP - 00258283 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 136.50 AP - 00258283 10/3/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 192.50 AP - 00258284 10/3/2007 INROADS PRINT SHOP 38.86 AP - 00258285 10/3/2007 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 19,421.97 AP - 00258286 10/3/2007 INSIGHT 312.37 AP - 00258287 10/3/2007 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF ASSEMBLY MGRS 365.00 AP - 00258288 10/3/2007 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTUR 145.00 AP - 00258289 10/3/2007 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,270.40 AP - 00258290 10/3/2007 IRON MOUNTAIN 306.30 AP - 00258291 10/3/2007 IRONMAN PARTS AND SERVICES 600.00 AP - 00258292 10/3/2007 J D C INC 77,788.10 AP - 00258292 10/3/2007 J D C INC 22,533.59 AP - 00258293 10/3/2007 J J KELLER AND ASSOC INC 217.16 AP - 00258294 10/3/2007 JARDINES, MANUEL 500.00 AP - 00258295 10/3/2007 JOHNSON LIFT HYSTER 9,997.05 AP - 00258296 10/3/2007 JOHNSON, BONNIE 81.00 AP - 00258297 10/3/2007 JOHNSON, JENNIFER 250.00 AP - 00258298 10/3/2007 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 3,349.66 AP - 00258299 10/3/2007 K K WOODWORKING 53.82 AP - 00258299 10/3/2007 K K WOODWORKING 39.86 AP - 00258300 10/3/2007 KADER, INTISAR ABDEL 145.00 AP - 00258301 10/3/2007 KELLY EQUIPMENT 623.16 AP - 00258302 10/3/2007 KLEIN PRODUCTS 121.15 AP - 00258304 10/3/2007 KUNZ, ANDY 100.00 AP - 00258305 10/3/2007 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 2,494.69 AP - 00258305 10/3/2007 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 1,142.25 AP - 00258305 10/3/2007 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 8,300.00 AP - 00258306 10/3/2007 LALONDE, JOHN 750.00 AP - 00258307 10/3/2007 LEE, PASTOR CHOE YOUL 147.00 AP - 00258308 10/3/2007 LIM, ANNA 20.00 AP - 00258309 10/3/2007 LINA 16,350.54 AP - 00258310 10/3/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP - 00258313 10/3/2007 MAGIC COACH TRANSPORTATION INC 325.00 AP - 00258314 10/3/2007 MAIN STREET SIGNS 477.12 AP - 00258314 10/3/2007 MAIN STREET SIGNS 694.99 AP - 00258315 10/3/2007 MANELA, ROSARIO 14.52 AP - 00258316 10/3/2007 MARKS A/C SERVICES 44.80 AP - 00258318 10/3/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 602.36 AP - 00258318 10/3/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -1 SO.S9 AP - 00258319 10/3/2007 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00258320 10/3/2007 MCBRIDE, JOHN H 100.00 AP - 00258322 10/3/2007 MEDINA, ARLENE 1,000.00 AP - 00258323 10/3/2007 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 4,500.00 AP - 00258323 10/3/2007 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 3.18750 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 65.97 AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 65.97 AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 43.98 AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 43.98 AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 65.96 AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 92.96 AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 33.98 AP - 00258324 10/3/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 33.98 AP - 00258325 10/3/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 19.00 AP - 00258325 10/3/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 39.00 AP - 00258325 10/3/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 32.46 AP - 00258326 10/3/2007 MURADIAN, HAI 75.00 AP - 00258327 10/3/2007 MYCO INVESTMENTS INC 1;500.00 AP - 00258329 10/3/2007 NASH, JESSICA ],088.14 AP - 00258330 10/3/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 32,964.64 AP - 00258331 10/3/2007 NIEL, BETSY 52.00 AP - 00258332 .10/3/2007 NINYO & MOORE 6,604.00 AP - 00258333 10/3/2007 NOWAK, JOHN 300.00 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 103.86 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 146.12 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00258334 ] 0/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 170.59 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 101.26 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 184.76 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 276.20 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 56.93 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 235.11 AP - 00258334 10/3/2007 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62 AP - 00258335 10/3/2007 OCLC INC 45.83 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 7.28 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 5.45 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1845 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 127.30 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2,799.78 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 215.49 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 215.49 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 56.89 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 4.74 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 38.63 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 77.02 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 14.51 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 48.48 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 96.39 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 58.17 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 20.98 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 54.82 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 311.77 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 28821 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 110.40 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1,058.62 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 348.94 AP - 00258336 10/3/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 404.80 AP - 00258337 10/3/2007 OLIVO, MAGALY 500.00 P70 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Rezrister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258338 10/3/2007 OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION CO 5,000.00 AP - 00258338 10/3/2007 OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION CO 5,000.00 AP - 00258339 10/3/2007 ONTARIO VOLKSWAGEN 1,503.65 AP - 00258340 10/3/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 3.62 AP - 00258340 10/3/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 99.94 AP - 00258340 10/3/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 5.12 AP - 00258341 10/3/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 70.93 AP - 00258343 10/3/2007 PAL CAMPAIGN 92.00 AP - 00258344 10/3/2007 PARAMOUNT TILE INC 21.42 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 71.12 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 42.50 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 247.83 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 127.50 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 2SS.00 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS SS.00 AP - 00258346 10/3/2007 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 59.26 AP - 00258347 10/3/2007 PEREZ, NICOLE 133.00 AP - 00258349 10/3/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 100.00 AP - 002S83S0 10/3/2007 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 269.08 AP - 00258351 10/3/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 12,964.94 AP - 00258351 10/3/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 9,780.56 AP - 002S83S2 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 15.00 AP - 002S83S2 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 342.82 AP - 00258352 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 419.32 AP - 00258352 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 979.50 AP - 00258352 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 500.00 AP - 00258352 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 82.05 AP - 00258352 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 1;688.00 AP - 00258352 10/3/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 2,059.27 AP - 00258353 10/3/2007 PORAC 190.00 AP - 00258354 10/3/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 277.89 AP - 00258355 10/3/2007 PRINCIPAL LIFE 2,091.85 AP - 00258356 10/3/2007 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 405.27 AP - 002S83S6 10/3/2007 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 2,998.98 AP - 00258357 10/3/2007 R AND R GARAGE DOOR SERVICE 1,OS8.00 AP - 00258358 ] 0/3/2007 R AND R LIGHTING COMPANY INC 89.64 AP - 00258359 10/3/2007 RACEWAY FORD 78,488.72 AP - 00258359 10/3/2007 RACEWAY FORD 26,162.91 AP - 00258360 10/3/2007 RAMCAM CORPORATION 10,000.00 AP - 00258361 10/3/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 45.00 AP - 00258361 10/3/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 45.00 AP - 00258362 10/3/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COURTYARD INN 9.07 AP - 00258363 10/3/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXPLORER POST # S39 4;000.00 AP - 00258364 10/3/2007 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 54.00 AP - 00258365 10/3/2007 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 200.00 AP - 00258367 10/3/2007 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 87.28 AP - 00258368 10/3/2007 REGENTS UC 144.00 AP - 00258368 10/3/2007 REGENTS UC 144.00 AP - 00258369 10/3/2007 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 38.60 AP - 00258369 10/3/2007 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 35.88 AP - 00258369 10/3/2007 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 58.72 AP - 00258370 10/3/2007 RICE, WILLIAM 500.00 P71 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:SO:S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258371 10/3/2007 RICE, WILLIAM 1,000.00 AP - 00258373 10/3/2007 RIGS, OLIVIA 500.00 AP - 00258374 10/3/2007 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 234.15 AP - 00258374 10/3/2007 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 152.86 AP - 00258375 10/3/2007 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 806.70 AP - 00258375 10/3/2007 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 672.25 AP - 00258375 10/3/2007 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 537.80 AP - 00258375 10/3/2007 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,075.60 AP - 00258376 10/3/2007 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240.00 AP - 00258376 10/3/2007 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240.00 AP - 00258376 10/3/2007 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 363.27 AP - 00258378 10/3/2007 ROSSCRETE ROOFING INC 264.44 AP - 00258379 10/3/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 288.00 AP - 00258380 10/3/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 247.50 AP - 00258380 10/3/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 330.00 AP - 00258380 10/3/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 247.50 AP - 00258381 10/3/2007 SARRAZIN, JULIE 95.27 AP - 00258382 10/3/2007 SAZO, MARIA 500.00 AP - 00258384 10/3/2007 SCHRADER, ALLISON 165.00 AP - 00258385 10/3/2007 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00 AP - 00258386 10/3/2007 SHEA CONSTRUCTION, J F 2,000.00 AP - 00258387 10/3/2007 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 250.00 AP - 00258388 10/3/2007 SHIELDS, CHARLES J 2,125.00 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 481.10 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 6,440.00 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,774.86 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,176.63 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,740.62 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 720.85 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 3,529.89 AP - 00258389 10/3/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 840.45 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51,162.00 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.01 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 476.23 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.61 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.00 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.07 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.65 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.20 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11 LOl AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.65 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30,322.87 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.23 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.37 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.31 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.29 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 P72 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Curren[ Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGEATDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P73 Agenda Check Resister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 31.94 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,029.21 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 178.87 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 304.53 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.95 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.70 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.63 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 520.12 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.75 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.09 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.94 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.67 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 177.35 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.99 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.37 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.33 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.00 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.39 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.43 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.84 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.43 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.26 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.28 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.89 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 286.79 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.17 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.13 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 487.94 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.57 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.84 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.60 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNLA EDISON 1552 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.29 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.34 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.33 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 188.71 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 819.87 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.66 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 186.27 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.32 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.52 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.08 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: ]0/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P74 Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.54 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 17.86 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.17 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.01 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.98 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.26 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.54 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.33 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.97 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.80 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.80 AP - 00258395 ] 0/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.47 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.26 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.32 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 16.90 AP - 00288398 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 67.62 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.66 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.47 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.86 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.59 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.00 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 16.90 AP - 00258395 10/3/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90 AP - 00258396 10/3/2007 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 546.00 AP - 00258397 10/3/2007 SPARKLETTS 38.98 AP - 00258397 10/3/2007 SPARKLETTS 71.98 AP - 00258398 10/3/2007 SPENCER, LETITIA 80.00 AP - 00258399 10/3/2007 SPINAL HEALTH CENTER 149.49 AP - 00258400 10/3/2007 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 579.83 AP - 00258401 10/3/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 179.00 AP - 00258402 10/3/2007 STAUFFER, DONALD M 82.50 AP - 00258403 10/3/2007 STOFA, JOSEPH 13.00 AP - 00258404 10/3/2007 STRESS LESS ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 2,808.00 AP - 00288408 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 318,309.56 AP - 00258405 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -4,140.29 AP - 00258405 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 73,342.52 AP - 00258405 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -7,334.25 AP - 00258405 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -56,386.44 AP - 00258405 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 563,864.40 AP - 00258405 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -31,830.96 AP - 00258405 10/3/2007 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 41,402.91 AP - 00258406 10/3/2007 SUNRISE FORD 62;839.11 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P75 Agenda Check Re¢ister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00258406 ] 0/3/2007 SUNRISE FORD ] 4.01 AP - 00258406 10/3/2007 SUNRISE FORD 329.28 AP - 00258406 10/3/2007 SUNRISE FORD 3,484.32 AP - 00258407 10/3!2007 SWARNA, MURALI KRISHNA 64.00 AP - 00258409 10/3/2007 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 258.00 AP - 00258410 10/3/2007 TERUYA, SHARON 100.00 AP - 00258411 10/3/2007 THEWES, KRISTINE 643.50 AP - 00258412 10/3/2007 TOBIAS, LA TASHA L 125.00 AP - 00258413 10/3/2007 TORRES, JOEL 550.00 AP - 00258414 10/3/2007 TOWN PLANNER 2,000.00 AP - 00258414 10/3/2007 TOWN PLANNER 2,000.00 AP - 002584 ] 5 10/3/2007 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 393.52 AP - 002584 ] 6 10/3/2007 TRICO TCH 8,950.00 AP - 00258417 10/3/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 623.25 AP - 00258417 10/3/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 888.81 AP - 00258418 10/3/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 37.79 AP - 00258418 10/3/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 47.78 AP - 00258418 10/3/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 1,000.11 AP - 00258418 10/3/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 57.40 AP-002584]8 10/3/2007 UNIFIRSTUNIFORMSERVICE 971.89 AP - 00258418 10/3/2007 UIQIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 133.83 AP - 00258418 10/3/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 146.49 AP - 00258418 10/3/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15 AP - 00258419 10/3/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 3,802.90 AP - 00258419 10/3/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 43,731.57 AP - 00258420 10/3/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 2,558.21 AP - 00258421 10/3/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 132.71 AP - 00258421 10/3/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 118.53 AP - 00258422 10/3/2007 UNITED WAY 329.82 AP - 00258423 10/3/2007 UPS 7582 AP - 00258424 10/3/2007 VALLEY CREST NURSERY 1,055.95 AP - 00258425 10/3/2007 VEND U COMPANY 99.00 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 87.52 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 567.95 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 462.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 35.16 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 195.98 AP-00258430 ]0/3/2007 VER[ZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 441.19 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 34.25 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 160.52 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 67.12 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 31.56 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 31.56 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 31.56 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.81 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:SO:S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P76 Agenda Check RePister 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 60.41 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 97.59 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 87.23 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERiZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 474.51 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.50 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 113.01 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 20.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 352.10 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 19.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 21.56 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 282.18 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 52.23 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 32.76 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 20.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 35.79 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 19.49 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 89.75 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 129.40 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 462.06 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 43.40 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 204.46 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 47.53 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 376.40 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 33.57 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 38.74 AP - 00258430 10/3/2007 VERIZON 567.95 AP - 00258431 10/3/2007 VERNON LIBRARY SUPPLIES INC 1,076.40 AP - 00258431 10/3/2007 VERNON LIBRARY SUPPLIES INC 29.50 AP - 00258432 10/3/2007 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00258433 10/3/2007 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,371.36 AP - 00258434 10/3/2007 VISTA PAINT 417.60 AP - 00288438 10/3/2007 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 138.98 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:80:8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 9/26/2007 through 10/9/2007 Check No. AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00258436 00258437 00258437 00258437 00258438 00258439 00258440 00258440 00258440 00258441 00258442 00258444 00258444 Check Date Vendor Name 10/3/2007 WADDELL, JAMIE 10/3/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 10/3/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 10/3/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 10/3/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 10/3/2007 WEST COAST COMMUNICATIONS INC 10/3/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 10/3/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 10/3/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 10/3/2007 WESTERN GROUP INC 10/3/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 10/3/2007 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 10/3/2007 WORD MILL PUBLISHING Amount 114.00 51.64 62.60 8.98 61.71 1,000.00 106.68 206.19 106.68 5.00 1,999.64 700.00 700.00 Total for Check ID AP: 5,985,882.37 Total for Entity: 5,985,882.37 P77 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 10/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 08:50:5 281,232.83 City of Rancho Cucamonga Investments Par Value Market Value Book Value % of Portfolio Term Days to Maturity yTM 360 Equiv. YTM 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funtl 20,904,447.10 20,904,447.10 20,904,447.10 14.24 1 1 5.159 5.231 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 121,000,000.00 121,079,602.06 120,921,537.50 82.36 1,519 623 4.483 4.545 Treasury Securities-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,053,125.00 5,002,343.75 3.41 661 516 4.654 4.719 146,904,447.10 147,037,174.16 146,828,328.35 100.00% 1,273 695 4.585 4.649 Investments Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase Subtotal Total Cash and Investments 2,944.44 2,944.44 284,177.27 264,177.27 147,185, 679.93 147, 321, 3 51.43 147,112, 505.62 i 1,273 1 0.197 0.200 695 4.585 4.649 Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 560,650.67 1,797,105.54 Average Daily Balance 147,785,007.07 157,245,599.07 Effective Rate of Return 4.62 % 4.53% I certify that this report accurately reflects all Agency pooled investments and is in conformity with fhe investment policy adopted December 20, 2006. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC) -Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of RDA 2001 & 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds as of current month end and Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. O /o ~ 7 John R. Gillison, Trea rer Reporting period 09101/2007-0913012007 Run Daie'. 101102007 - 14'.33 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary September 30, 2007 261,232.63 261,232.83 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PMt) SymRept 6.41.202E Report Ver. 5 W V Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments September 30, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Matunty Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 20,904,447.10 20,904,447.10 20,904,447.10 5.231 Subtotal and Average 17,364,447.10 20,904,447.10 20,904,447.10 20,904,447.10 5.159 6.159 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 31331OK55 904 31331OM79 911 31331TND9 - 927 31331TWH0 935 31331TWJ6 938 31331TG62 942 31331TU25 952 31331XNU2 966 31331X705 972 31331XA38 982 3133X4087 937 3133X4XF3 938 3133XAR25 955 3133XAMW4 957 3133XJVL9 967 3133XK5O4 969 3133XKUH6 981 3133XL3O4 984 3133XLAH6 986 3133XLAF0 987 3133XLBS1 988 3128XiBD8 903 3128XiJD0 914 3128X25Y7 940 3128X3BF9 941 3128X3FC2 945 3128X3FZ1 946 3128X5C48 965 3128XSR75 971 3128XSR75 973 3128XSK80 979 3136FSGP0 934 Rio Da1e:1a1azoo7 -14:33 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,000,000.00 1,979,375.00 1,997,SOO.OD 3.120 3.104 231 05/19/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 3,OOO,OOD.00 2,969,062.50 3,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 248 06/03/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 4,000,000.00 3,978,750.00 4,000,000.00 3.970 3.916 260 06/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,985,825.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 168 03/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 3,000,000.00 2,967,187.50 2,998,125.00 3.550 3.517 413 11/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,000,000.00 2,979,375.00 2,982,000.00 3.920 4.012 392 10/27/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 70 12/10/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/13/2007 3,000,000.00 3,008,437.50 3,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 865 02/12/2010 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,017,187.50 5,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 1,640 03/28/2012 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,054,375.00 3,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 7,332 05/25/2011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03!26/2004 2,000,000.00 1,985,625.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 542 03/26/2009 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,992,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.453 88 12/28/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 4,000,000.00 3,978,750.00 4,000,000.00 4.080 .4.024 322 08/18/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 4,000,000.00 3,985,000.00 3,999,000.00 4.000 3.954 144 02/22/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/13/2007 3,000,000.00 3,050,625.00 3,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,257 03/11/2011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/09/2007 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,999,250.00 5.000 5.031 100 01/09/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,026,250.00 3,984,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,331 05/24/2011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2007 3,000,000.00 3,035,625.00 3,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1,702 05/29/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/18/2007 2,000,000.00 2,015,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,722 06/18/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/20/2007 1,000,000.00 1,007,500.00 1,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,724 06/20/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,019,687.50 3,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 998 06/25/2010 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,959,455.11 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 231 05/19/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 06/12/2003 3,000,000.00 2,964,651.03 2,999,100.00 3.030 2.995 254 06/11/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/19/2004 2,000;000.00 1,997,919.92 1,997,600.00 2.920 2.916 18 10/19/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/26/2004 2,000,000.00 1,997,605.90 2,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 25 10/26/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 2,994,672.09 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.708 53 11/23/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/26/2004 3,000,000.00 2,984,745.03 2,993,700.00 4.000 4.002 235 05/23/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 02/08/2007 3,000,000.00 3,008,648.99 3,000,000.00 5.375 5.301 881 02/08/2010 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 03/2(1/2007 1,000,000.00 1,005,827.94 998,300.00 5.250 5.217 1,627 03/15/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/04/2007 2,000,000.00 2,011,655.88 1,995,600.00 5.250 5.228 1,627 03/15/2012 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/10/2007 5,1100,000.00 5,036,920.17 5,000,000.00 5.400 5.324 -1,614 03/02/2012 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/18/2004 3,000,000.00 2,979,375.00 3,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 532 03/16/2009 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF PM2) SymRept 6.41.202b V (O Repoli Ver. 5 W Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments September 30, 2007 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturlry CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3136F5PB1 939 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 2,000,000.00 1,998,750,00 2,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 11 10/12/2007 3136F6Y06 956 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/22/2005 4,000,000.00 3,985,000.00 3,997,200.00 4.000 3.970 144 02/22/2008 3136FBFW0 968 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/07/2007 5,000,000.00 5,020,312.50 5,000,000.00 5.430 5.356 1,253 03/07/2011 3136FBLU7 976 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,021,875.00 4,996,250.00 5.250 5.199 1,316 05/09/2011 31398ABC5 977 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 3,000,000.00 3,020,625.00 2,998,500.00 5.300 5.239 1,680 05/07/2012 31398ABC5 980 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21/2007 1,000,000.00 1,006,875.00 997,000.00 5.300 5.296 1,680 05/07/2012 31398ACL4 983 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,023,750.00 4,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 1,702 05/29/2012 31398ADF6 985 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/12/2007 4,000,000.00 4,028,750.00 3,995,600.00 5.600 5.548 1,716 06/12/2012 Subtotal and Average 125,288,134.17 121,000,000.00 121,079,602.06 120,921,537.50 4.483 823 Treasury Securities -Coupon 912828GJ3 978 TREASURY NOTE 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,053,125.00 5,002,343.75 4.750 4.654 516 02/28/2009 Subtotal antl Average 5,002,343.75 5,000,000.00 5,053,125.00 5,002,343.75 4.654 516 Total and Ave2ge 147,785,007.07 Run Oaie: 10/10I20W - 14:33 146,904,447.10 147,037,174.16 146,828,328.35 4.585 695 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PM2)6ymRapi6A1.202b ~ Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Cash September 30, 2007 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts SYS144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 281,232.63 261,232.83 261,232.63 0.200 0.197 1 Average Balance 0.00 ACUUed Interest at Purchase 2,944.44 2,944.44 1 Subtotal 284,177.27 284,177.27 Total Cash antl lnvestmentss 147,785,007.07 147,185,679.93 147,321,351.43 147,112,505.62 4.585 695 Portfolio RDA CP Run Date: 10110/2007 -14:33 PM (PRF PM2) 6ymRept 6.41.202E ~ Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Activity By Type September 7, 2007 through September 30, 2007 Beginning Stated Transac0on Purchases Retlemp0ons Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Ra[e Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 5 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYSi45 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.231 6,400,000.00 3,200,000.00 Subtotal 17,704,447.10 6,400,000.00 3,200,000.00 20,904,447.10 SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 156,362.87 0.00 Subtotal 124,869.96 156,362.87 0.00 281,232.83 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 31339XPL2 917 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.450 09/28/2007 0.00 5,000,000.00 3136FBGC3 970 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 5.260 09/07/2007 0.00 999,650.00 Subtotal 126,921,187.50 0.00 5,999,650.00 120,921,537.50 Treasury Securities -Coupon Subtotal 5,002,34J.75 5,002,343.75 Total 149,752,848.31 6,556,362.87 9,199,650.00 147,109,561.18 Portfolio RDA CF ~ Run Daie: 10110200] -14:33 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRapt 6 41.202 N Report Ver. 5.00 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended August 37, 2007 Trustee andlor Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Paving Aoent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value 96 Housing Set-Aside Tax Bank of New York Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2002 N/A' 4.04% $ 905,001.23 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2006 N/A' 4.04% 797,303.42 Housing Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 3 /1 212 0 0 2 N/A` 4.00% 0.50 $ 1,702,305.15 Ot Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8!22/2001 N/A' 3.97% $ 7,371,529.03 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A' 3.97% 10,000.00 Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/3112005 N/A' 3.97% 1,860,871.88 Special Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/30/2005 N/A' 3.97% 27,800.76 $ 9,270,201.67 99 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 2/28/2005 N/A' 3.97% $ 1,085,280.56 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A' 3.97% 2,210,002.02 Special Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/302005 N/A' 3.97% 0.53 $ 3,295,283.11 04 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Investment Agreement 3/31/2004 ~ N/A' 5.07% $ 12,938,491.70 Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 2/28/2005 N/A' 3.97% 3,473,932.50 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A' 3.97% 3,475,000.00 Special Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/30/2005 N/A` 3.97% 334,752.21 $ 20,222,176.41 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 34,469,966.34 ' Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand OD W RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary September 30, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Book k of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value PoMollo Term Matudty 360 Equly. 766 Equly. Treasury Securities-BEGS 16,260,200.00 16,260,200.00 18,260,200.00 78.07 243 169 4.900 4.968 Treasury Securities-SLGS Demantl 4,568,104.29 4,568,104.29 4,566,104.29 21.93 1 1 3.669 3.720 20,828,304.29 20,826,304.29 20,828,304.29 100.00°/ 190 132 4.630 4.694 Investments Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year 7o Date Current Year 79,824.80 ~ 274,262.64 Average Daily Balance 20,941,681.08 21,845,022.22 Effective Rate of Return 4.64% 4.98° This report accurately re0eds the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated August 1, 2001. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements. Reporting period 0910112007-0913012007 Run Dale: 10/10/2007 -14'.35 Portfolio TAB CP PM (PRF_PM1)SymRept 6.41.202b ~ Report Ver. 5.00 ~ RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments September 30, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 765 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS101 101 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.231 5.231 1 Subtotal antl Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Treasury Securities -SLGS 535578670 128 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 4.860 4.860 4 10/05/2007 535580620 129 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 1,830,100.00 4.940 4.940 35 11/05/2007 535581810 130 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 4.990 4.990 65 12/05/2007 535583060 131 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.020 5.020 96 01/05/2008 535583080 132 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.020 5.020 127 02/05/2008 535583700 133 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.010 5.010 156 03/05/2008 S35584200 134 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.000 5.000 187 04/05/2008 535585190 135 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,680.00 4.990 4.990 217 05/05/2008 535585220 136 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 4.980 4.980 248 06/05/2008 S35586010 137 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.970 4.970 278 07/05/2008 535586120 138 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.963 309 OB/OS/2008 535586550 139 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.965 340 09/05/2008 535586660 140 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 808,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.966 370 10/05/2008 535586670 141 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.930 4.936 401 11/05/2008 535586800 142 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,370.00 608,370.00 608,370.00 4.930 4.934 431 12/05/2008 Subtotal antl Average 16,504,217.37 16,260,200.00 16,260,200.00 16,260,200.00 4.968 169 Checking Account SYS125 725 BANK OF AMERICA 07/01/2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 1 Subtotal antl Average 368,291.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand SYS143 143 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 3,164,872.41 3,164,872.41 3,164,872.41 3.840 3.840 1 SYS144 144 TREASURY SLGS 09/11/2007 1,403,231.88 1,403,231.88 1,403,231.88 3.450 3.450 1 Subtotal antl Average 4,069,176.81 4,568,104.29 4,568,104.29 4,868,104.29 3.720 1 Total antl Average 20,941,681.08 20,628,704.29 20,828,304.29 20,828,704.29 4.694 172 Run Date: 10/108007 - 14:35 Portfolio TAB CP PM (PRF_PM2) 9ymRept 6.41.202b (71 Rapon Ver. 500 RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Activity By Type September 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Retlemptlons Entling CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 3 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) subtotal o.oo o.a9 Treasury Securities -BEGS 535577850 127 TREASURY SLGS 4.720 09/05/2007 0.00 1,830,100.00 Subtotal 78,090,300.00 0.00 1,830,100.00 16,260,200.00 Checking Account (Monthly Summary) SYS125 725 BANK OF AMERICA 1,841,459.66 1,841,459.66 Subtotal 0.00 1,641,459:66 1,847,459.66 0.00 Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand (Monthly Summary) SYS743 143 TREASURY SLGS 3.8411 30,142.41 0.00 SYS144 144 TREASURY SLGS 3.450 1,403,231.88 0.00 Subtotal 3,134,730.00 1,433,374.29 0.00 4,568,104.29 Total 21,225,030.00 Run Oate: 10It01200] - 14:35 3,274,873.95 3,671,559.66 20,828,304.29 Portfolio TAB CIS PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6 41.202 ~ Rapon Var. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Investments RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary September 30, 2007 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Malunty 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 145,439.24 145,439.24 145,439.24 0.19 1 1 5.159 5.231 Wells Fargo Money Market Fund 77,008,663.37 77,008,663.37 77,008,663.37 99.81 1 1 3.886 3.940 77,154,702.61 77,154,102.61 77,754,102.61 100.00% 1 7 3.888 3.942 Investments Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 256,910.48 801,687.11 Average Daily Balance 78,706,530.98 79,668,490.77 Effective Rate of Return 3.97°/ 3.98° This report accurately re0eds the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated March 31, 2004. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Bow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements. Reporting period 0910112007-09130/2007 Run Date: t W 101200] - 14:36 Portfolio TA64 CP PM (PRF_PMil6ymRepi641202b ~ Relwtl Ver. 5.00 V RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments September 30, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days [o Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 365 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS401 401 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 145,439.24 145,439.24 145,439.24 5.231 5.231 1 Subtotal antl Average 145,439.24 145,4J9.2d 145,439.24 145,639.24 5.231 1 Wells Fargo Money Market Fund SYS405 405 WELLS FARGO 77,006,663.37 77,006,663.37 77,006,663.37 3.940 3.940 1 Subtotal and Average 76,561,091.74 77,008,663.J7 77,006,667.37 77,OOB,66J.J7 3.940 1 Total antl Aveage 78,706,SJ0.98 Run Data: 10/1020W -14:35 77,154,102.61 77,154,102.61 77,154,102.61 3.942 1 Portfolio TA64 CP PM (PRF_PM2) fiymRapi 6 41 202b ~ QD Repotl Ver. 5.00 RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Page 3 Activity By Type September 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 Beginning Statetl Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) Subtotal 145,479.24 145,439.24 Wells Fargo Money Market Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS406 405 WELLS FARGO 3.940 256,106.56 2,000,000.00 Subtotal 76,752,554.79 256,108.56 2,000,000.00 77,008,663.37 Total 78,997,996.03 Run Date: 10/10200] -14'.36 256,106.56 2,000,000.00 77,154,102.61 Portfolio TA84 CI ~ PM (PRF_PM3) SymRep1641.202 ~ Report Ver. 5.00 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~(Y'',~~ Date: October 17, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle. Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of recreation programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in the Community Services Department. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. Seniors: • The table below highlights some senior activities that took place during September 2007, as well as the total number of registrations for the calendar year for Wellness Pass. Activit Date Participants Senior Bi Band Dance Se tember 8 103 Senior Prom Se tember 16 130 Senior Birthda s Au ust 29 70 Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re istered -1065 Wellness Pass - A es 50-59 Total Re istered - 483 Silver Fox Ex ress Total Re istered - 176 • Uocoming senior activities are summarized below: Activit Date Time Senior Adviso Committee Meetin October 22 9:00 a.m. Senior Birthda s October 31 11:00 a.m. Oktoberfest October 19 6:00 .m. Halloween S ooktacular October 25 9:30 a.m. Veterans Da November 12 11:00 a.m. Human Services: The table below and on the following page summarizes participation in Human Services activities for the month of September 2007: Program Participants Blood Pressure Screenin 88 Resource Libra 99 P90 P91 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 2 OCTOBER 10, 2007 Pro ram Partici ants Commodities 528 Bereavement Su ort 5 Elder Law Private Counselin 5 HICAP 4 Dr. Cohen - "The Doctor is In" 8 Peo le with Arthritis can Exercise 272 Sit and Be Fit 204 Trips and Tours: The table below summarizes participation in trips and tours activities for the month of September 2007: Trip Date Number Partici ants Julian Se tember 21~ 44 Lau hlin Se tember 23` 48 "Thoroughly Modern Millie" @ The Lawrence Welk Resort and Theatre October 2" 50 "Wicked" at the Panta es Theatre October 4 43 Griffith Observato October 10 32 • Uocoming trips and tours activities are summarized below: Trip Date M ste Tri October 22 Palms rin Follies October 30 Gett Villa Malibu November 1 Special Needs Programs: • The table below highlights special needs activities that took place during September 2007: Activit Date Participants G mnastics Se tember 10, 2007 4 Introduction to Martial Arts: a e 5-10 Se tember 10, 2007 3 Introduction to Martial Arts: a e 11-21 Se tember 10, 2007 5 IncredABLES Cookin Corner Se tember 11, 2007 9 Star Performers Se tember 12, 2007 16 Frida Ni ht Fun Club -Back to School Bash Se tember 21, 2007 18 IncredABLE Athletes -Basketball Se tember 25, 2007 14 Upcoming special needs activities are summarized below: Activit Date Time IncredABLES Cookin Corner October 16 2007 3:00 m - 4:00 m Halloween Ho Dance October 19, 2007 5:30 m - 7:30 m Holida Movie Fun November 16, 2007 5:30 m - 7:30 m P92 APPROVAL OF THE COMMiJNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 3 OCi'OBER 10, 2007 Tech Junction: • Free Senior Computer and Contract Class activities being offered during the month of October 2007, are listed below: Senior Com uter Classes Date Introduction to Word Processin October 1s - 10 Introduction to Windows and PC's October 2" - 11 Introduction to Power Point October 15 - 24 Introduction to Surfin the Internet October 16 - 25 E-mail & E-cards October 5 -12 New- Blo in Online November 8 - 16th Introduction to Windows & PC's November 5 - 26 Publisher Worksho November 6 - 27 I Introduction to Word Processin November 7 - 287 Volunteers: • The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the month of August 2007: Division AUGUST 2007 # of # of Volunteers Hours * $ Value JULY- AUGUST 2007 # of # of Volunteers Hours * $ Value Administration 5 15 $296 10 30 $592 Senior Services 147 1,714 $33,834 355 4,573 $90,265 Human Services 20 63 $1,244 85 304 $6,002 S orts 100 1,896 $37,427 300 3,940 $77,775 S ecial Events 66 418 $1,066 352 834 $9,268 Pertormin Arts 65 456 $9,001 190 1,389 $27,408 Teens 30 485 $9,574 155 2,997 $59,166 Youth Pro rams 5 220 $4,343 29 710 $14,016 Totals 438 5,267 $96,785 1,476 14,777 $284,492 'Based on $19.74/hour- State average as determined the California Independent Sector. Youth: • The table below summaries youth program attendance for the month of September: Program Classes/Sites Registrants/Attendance Pla school 65/5 944/7,406 Lewis Partnership Kids Club @ Evergreen &Terra Vista 2 sites 160 A artments • Mobile Recreation "Fun on the Run" -Total attendance for Mobile Recreation during the last two weeks of September was 108. The chart on the following page provides the schedule for Mobile Recreation for the fall season that started up on September 17`h and will continue through November 2007. P93 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PncE 4 OCTOBER 10, 2007 Da of the Week Park Location Time Frame Monda Bear Gulch 2:30-5:00 .m. Tuesda Hermosa 2:30-5:00 .m. Wednesda Windrows 2:30-5:00 .m. Thursda Ellena 2:30-5:00 .m. Frida Old Town 2:30-5:00 .m. Teens: • The table below summarizes teen program attendance for the month of September 2007: Pro ram/Activit Attendance /Partici ation Teen Center 801 artici ants/78hours Teen Center-Rental 26 artici ants/4 s ectators/3 hours TRAC Meetin s 18 volunteers/94.75 hours TRAC - Babysitting 82 participants/19 volunteers/105.5hours of service Teen Connection Volunteens /Special Events 10 volunteens/25.5 volunteer hours Teen Worksho -Bab sittin 18 artici ants/90 hours Teen Worksho - PSAT Testin 33 artici ants/82.5 hours Youth Sports: • The table below summarizes vouch sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Partici ants Age/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Soccer 512 3-5/bo s & iris 48 Youth Basketball 752 6-16/bo s & irls 90 Youth Fla Football 270 6-15/bo s & irls 25 Com etitive Basketball Lea ue 38 11-13/ iris 4 Youth Volle ball 215 8-14/ irls & bo s 21 Cucamon a Middle School -Judo 260 8-adult N/A Northtown O en Pla 33 6-13/bo s & irls N/A Northtown Pee Wee Soccer 1 3-5/bo s & iris N/A Northtown Soccer 3-A-side 33 6-14/bo s & irls 8 Northtown Hi Ho Dance Class 12 5-17/bo s & iris N/A Northtown Cheerleadin Class 4 5-17/bo s & iris N/A Northtown Basketball 3-on-3 68 6-15/bo s & irls 14 RC Family Sports Center: • The table below and on the following page provides drop-in/open play and rental participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activit #Partici ants Adult Basketball 184 Youth Basketball 679 Adult Rac netball 320 P94 APPROVAL OF Tf IE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 5 OCTOBER 10, 2007 Activit #Partici ants Youth Rac uettiall 40 Adult Volle ball 4 Youth Volle ball 180 Youth Wall ball 39 Jazzercise 925 Ju'itsu 208 Rentals 440 Adult Sports: • The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period: Activit #Partici ants # Team Gender Softball 2,421 167 Males/Females Adult Soccer 240 24 Male & Female Tennis 14 N/A Males/Females Rac uetball 12 N/A Males/Females Basketball Full Court 252 25 Males Northtown Hip Hop Aerobics 2 N/A Males/Females • There were five (5) adult softball tournaments during the month of September at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park. Special Events: • Upcoming special events are noted below: Event Date/Time Location Rails to Trails -Ribbon Cuttin October 27 /3:00-6:00 pm Central Park Trailhead Founders Festival - "A Circus November 10 /9:30 am Victoria Gardens Regional Celebration" includes our annual Town Center & the Bank community parade and awards ceremony, of America Imagination the celebration of the City's 30~' birthday Courtyard at the Cultural and famil entertainment. Center Cultural and Performing Arts: • The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academy classes during the reporting period: Activit Partici ants/Attendance Adult Im rov Worksho 27 Adult Chorale Trou e 26 Teen Actors Boot Cam 26 Youth Theatre Worksho a es 6-10 44 Youth Theatre Worksho a es 11-17 57 Musical Theatre 43 Be innin Actin 36 Sin in for a Lifetime 64 Broadwa Babies 133 Total 456 P95 APPROVAL OF THE COIvIMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 6 OCTOBER 10, 2007 Cultural Center Rental Activities: The table below summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall at the Cultural Center for the month of September: Date A IicanUEvent Attendance Se tember 4 Jade Aveda/Trainin 19 Se tember 8 Archibald Libra /Literac Celebration 86 Se tember 8 Los Osos Hi h School/Fundraiser 330 Se tember 12 CREW -Inland Em ire 54 Se tember 15 J. Se ovia/Weddin Rece tion 193 Se tember 16 Mom's Club/Trainin 234 Se tember 18 ZIP Realt /Meetin 72 Se tember 20 Southland Title/Meetin 186 Se tember 21~ Vicenti, Llo d & Stutzman 52 Se tember 22" S. Flores/Ba tismal Rece tion 53 Se tember 22" R. Torres/Home Aid Auction 127 Se tember 25 K. S kes/Business Meetin 31 Se tember 25`h San Bernardino County Economic Develo ment/Set-u 3 Se tember26~' San Bernardino County Economic Develo ment/Conference 1,100 Se tember 28`h RC Chamber of Commerce/Grape Harvest Festival 1,000 Se tember 29`" RC Chamber of Commerce/Grape Harvest Festival 1,000 Se tember 30'" RC Chamber of Commerce/Grape Harvest Festival 1,000 TOTAL 5,540 Lewis Family Playhouse: The 2n° season of the Lewis Family Playhouse opened during the reporting period. The table below summarizes the specialty series, family series and community theatre series productions that took place during the month of September: Lewis Famil Pla house Professional) Presented Productions Event Date Attendance Number of Events Rich Little & Friends (speciairyserles) Se tember 14`h 386 1 Later Vaudeville (ramiiyseries) Se tember 15`" 624 2 Collin Ra a (specia/tyseries) Se tember 215` 459 1 Lewis Famil Playhouse Communit Theatre Productions Event Date Attendance Number of Events Pump Bo sand the Dinettes Se tember 28-30 541 4 Cultural Center Public Lobby: The Lobbv to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is open to the public seven days a week. During the month of September 2007, 1,291 community members visited the facility's public areas. P96 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE PAGE 7 OCTOBER 10, 2007 Recreation Classes: The fall session recreation classes started on September 8"' and will end on November 30"' Two hundred ninety-eight (298) classes at 28 different sites throughout the City are being offered during this timeframe. Currently there are a total of 2,401 participants enrolled in the Department's fall recreation classes. Facilities: • The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of September: Facility Rentals # Rentals/Bookings Rental Attendance Building Attendance Lions Center East 14/68 2,840 4,370 Lions Center West 36/125 3,860 4,760 James L. Brulte Senior Center 78/217 6,832 20,076 Gold S. Lewis Communit Center 85/167 10,673 11,103 Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Alta Loma Riding Club, Rancho Rebels 4-H, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Citizen Mounted Patrol.) to address maintenance needs and programming. Parks: • The table on the following page provides usage information for Dark picnic shelters and s ecial use facilities for the month of September 2007: Park/Shelter Attendance/Partici ants # Rentals Red Hill 1,942 39 Herita a 781 19 Milliken 502 21 Hermosa 354 15 Co ote Can on 206 9 Civic Center Court and 0 0 Am hitheatre 100 4 TOTAL 3,885 107 Equestrian Rentals/Drop-in Use Participants: 215 S ectators: 0 9 • Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Epicenter Rentals/Activities: • The following rental activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period: A licant Event Location Date Lymphoma & Light the Night Walk Epicenter - Parking September 29, 2007 Leukemia Societ Lot B Preferred Businesses Home & Garden Show Special Event Lot October 1-8, 2007 of America P97 APPROVAL OF TfIE COMMUNITYSERVICESDEPARTMENTUPDATE PACE 8 OCTOBER 10, 2007 Staff is working with the following applicants for upcoming rentals and activities at the Epicenter: A licant Event Location Pro osed Date Active Ride Bling Fest 2007 Special Event Lot November 17 & 18, 2007 Park and Recreation Commission: The Park and Recreation Commission's next meeting is scheduled for October 18, 2007. At this meeting the items are agenized for discussion: - Senior Advisory Committee update. - Sports Advisory Committee update. - Discussion regarding proof of non-profit status for rentals of City facilities. - Approval of applications and schedule for the City's 2008 street banner program. - Consideration of a name for South Etiwanda Park. - Status report regarding the development of a neighborhood park north of Foothill Blvd. on Garcia. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: • The Community Foundation continues to work with the Library Foundation on the Promoting Arts and Literacy (PAL) Campaign to secure significant donors for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The next full Board Meeting of the Community Foundation met on, October 10, 2007 at the Civic Center. The following agenda items were discussed/acted upon - Discussion regarding the Community Foundation's Strategic Thinking Process. - Consideration of a special meeting of the Foundation Board in November 2007. Kevin Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncil&BOardsl CityCouncill StaHReport51200TCSD. Update.10.17.07. doc STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTbIENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Subject: 1 P98 `~ ' ~I K~ RANCHO ~UCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of eleven (11) Ford Escape hybrid vehicles from Sunrise Ford of Fontana, California, through a competitive bid process, in the amount of $282,574, funded as follows: ten (10) vehicles in the amount of $256,886 funded by account number 1712001-5604 (Vehicle Replacement Fund) and one (1) vehicle in the amount of $25,688 funded by account number 1139303-5604 (LMD 9), as approved in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of eleven (11) new and replacement vehicles in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2007/08 budget. Specifications were provided to Purchasing by Fleet Maintenance for the vehicles. Purchasing prepared a formal request for bid, number 07/08-010, and sent it to 16 dealers. Eight (8) responses and one (1) no bid were received. After analysis of the bid responses by the Fleet Maintenance Supervisor and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined that Sunrise Ford has submitted the lowest, most responsive, responsible bid that meets the specifications required by the Engineering Department, Fleet Division. Attached for review is the final bid abstract. R tfully Submitted, i~~~ Will m J. O eil City Engineer WJO:GG:dI Greg Gunski, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager P99 m S . N X o W o O a h ~ m O L[ ~ Z w a F rF~ F o~~ gY~~ o : ~ W~ X000<~ . :. m ~ . 3 F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ° = 4 u a - s p p~ °,8 ~ffi a tl & c E .9 ~ - « R sF ° ~ a a 3 o s H ~« s~ ~ pd L s ~ ~~ € ~ o = y<€ 8 8 8~ ~~ ~ a ~ LL B ~ ° W ° R i~ ~ .. ° F ~ $ « w e y i ¢ ® e a - g `E . ~Z O j g ¢~ h ~ ~ 1I ~1 S~ ' ~ 0 33 8 R _ ~ 1 xI x W« a 8~~~' e, a s e "~~~ ' 8 5 a € ~~a : ~ o LL ~ « „ -•_ §~93 _ _ W S C A. s B a a FI G a C ~ ° tl g e ^ ~ ~ ~ «I«I x « ~ ~ ~ m ~ a a ~ § ~ ~ o g i! ° ~j z° ~ ~ ~ 9 ` E R R s5~ m pp E ~ d o p :_ ~E8 s 8 8 ~ ml°' ^ = 9 ~ ~ ~ a ~ e g e m g ° ~ a ~ F 8 Bl ej I'"i c _ a ^ F u _ 1 _ a « ` ~ p ' ~ R -a ff ~ u 0 ~ i i J & R s a 8 e ~ eo - ~ ~ r ya ° a a p a ~ ~" ( ~, y ~g Pq3~ _ s a e ~ - ~.a~~p ~ ` 7 _ 9 ~ F }~y p3eEdA ea$m¢4 w ~w €~~g l p F n a pn ~ ~ d l ~ e 0 ^~Q 81 i° 39 PS I 2 d ~8 as STAFF REPORT ENGINF_ERING DEPARTbIENT Date: Octoberl7, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer P100 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA MASTER PLAN FOR FY 2006/2007 AND APPROPRIATION OF $11],024.00 TO ACCOUNT 1116303-5650/1026116-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $111,024.00 to account 1 1 1 63 03-565 0/1 026 1 1 6-0 for Etiwanda Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements for FY 2006/2007. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Etiwanda Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements are based on the net Etiwanda Drainage funds received each fiscal year. The remaining funds in the Etiwanda drainage Fund will be utilized for City projects. Annually, at the end of each fiscal year, after the City's financial books are closed, fifty percent (50%) of all Etiwanda Drainage fees collected during the fiscal yeaz are set aside into a "planned drainage reimbursement fund." The developers who are required by the City to construct planned drainage facilities necessary for proper drainage of their subdivisions enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City. The planned drainage reimbursement fund is divided beriveen all these developers with the numerator being the original reimbursement sum for the developer and the denominator is the total of the original reimbursement sums for all developers who are eligible to share in the planned drainage reimbursement fund for said fiscal year. The total amount due to be reimbursed this fiscal year is $111,024.00. Respectively submitted, `%~~/l;' William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DJ:dlw P101 . . STAFF REPORT LNGIV•EEI2ING DL-P_j RT~fENT RANCHO Date: October 17, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer // By: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer H 9~D Subject: APPROVAL TO AMEND THE CONTRACT TO R. J. NOBLE COMPANY (CO #07-041) IN THE AMOUNT OF $130,000.00 FOR THE LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS AND APPROPRIATE $80,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11903035650/1022190-0 FROM PROP 42 TRAFFIC RELIEF FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an amendment to the contract to R. J. Noble Company (CO #07-041) in the amount of $130,000.00 for the Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets and appropriate $80,000.00 to Account No. 11903035650/1022190-0 from Prop 42 Traffic Relief fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 13, 2007, for the subject project. The original contract amount is $1,511,575.15 with 10% contingency. The requested amendment and appropriation is for additional work as approved by previous change orders. The FY 2006/2007 Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets scope of work consists of crack sealing, cold planing, asphalt overlay, protection and/or adjustment of valve covers, protection of existing survey monuments and manholes, re-striping and pavement markings. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~2~~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH:Is Attachment P102 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 2006/07 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OVERLAY PROJECTS ~'~" ~~: .; N e: N.T.S. STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Date: October 17, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services By: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCH/ P103 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Directors of the Fire Board approval to award a contract for the purchase of gasoline and diesel fuel from Southern Counties Oil CO., LTD (SC Fuels) for Fleet Maintenance, Police Department, and Fire District, through a competitive bid process, in annual amounts as per adopted budget, fund by account numbers 1001317-5255 (Fleet), 1001317-5256 (Fleet), 1001701- 5255 (Police Department), 3281-527-5255 (Fire District), and 3281527-5256 (Fire District), and approval to award an additional 10% contingency to each account for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2007/08, with an option to renew upon mutual consent for additional one (1)year periods, up to a total of three (3) years BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Purchasing determined it was time to review the current procurements for gasoline and diesel fuels. Specifications and estimated annual volumes were provided by Engineering's Fleet Division and the Fire Protection District. The bid solicitation began on June 11, 2007 and was sent to six (6) vendors in which four (4) responses were received. After careful analysis of each bid response, Southern Counties Oil CO., LTD (SC Fuels) was able to offer the City of Rancho Cucamonga the lowest, most responsive, responsible bid. The Purchasing Division will again review any additional opportunities on a fiscal year basis before renewal of the fuel contract. RR ecCmitted, John Gillison Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services P104 Staff Report DATE: October 17, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJF.CI': APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF CONTRACT 07193 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MOOSEPOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC. FOR GEOSMART SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS TO BE UTILIZED ON THE CITY'S INTRANET AND INTERNET IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,330.00 FUNDED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER 1714001-5152. It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize the execution of contract 07193 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and MoosePoint Technology, Inc. for GeoSmart Software Applications to be utilized on the City's Intranet and Internet in the amount of $55,330.00 funded by account number 1714001-5152. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City is desirous of creating access to a City-wide or an "enterprise-wide" GIS system for residents and staff to provide better access to innovative GIS related information with a focus on neighborhoods. Vendors were invited to make presentations to staff and MoosePoint Technology, Inc.'s GeoSmart.net applications were chosen as the single source whose softwaze solutions best meet and address the needs of the City. Additionally, the applications interface with the City's current GIS softwaze. GeoSmart.net will help in disseminating spatial data and services to staff and to the public through user-friendly web-based applications. Land use and zoning information, trash collection days, street sweeper routes, school district boundaries, voter polling locations, cable company boundaries, schools and pazk locations with tree dedication sites, and other City facilities are some of the data that can be hosted on these web applications. Additionally, road closures due to development and/or natural disasters can also be hosted. P105 On the Intranet this service can provide quick access to property ownership; create mailing labels; allow staff to create buffers and save and print maps concerning current projects they are working on; and allow staff to facilitate outside requests for information readily. Res ect submitted, n . Gi son Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Attachments: Proposal Professional Services Agreement 2- P106 October 9, 2007 Ingrid Bruce City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Ingrid: MoosePoint Technology is pleased to provide the enclosed quotation and scope of work/deliverables to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Also included for your review is our standard software support program, our hourly rate and fee schedule and several possible system configuration options. We are proud to be recognized as an ESRI Elite Business Partner. Acknowledged for our outstanding achievements in Internet mapping solutions, our innovative product GeoSmart.net, and our dedication to customer service and support, we were selected as the 2004 Partner of the Year. MoosePoint Technology is committed to the success of this project. We truly believe GeoSmart.net solutions are a very good fit for Rancho Cucamonga's needs and are confident you will be pleased with our products and services. If you have any questions or need additional information please don't hesitate to contact me Warm Regards, Thorne Bertrand MoosePoint Technology P107 MoosePoint TECHNOLOGY, INC. 19229 Sonoma Highway #257 Sonoma, CA 954765413 707.566.6720 QUOTATION Date Quotation # 10/9/2007 RCGSNE1007 Name /Address City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Ingrid Bruce Rep Quotation Valid Until TB 12/09/2007 Description Qty Rate Total GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition License 1 15,000.00 15,000.OOT (single server, multi-user, for non-commercial use) (First year maintenance included. Future years annual maintenance calculated at 20% of retail price.) GeoSmart.net Certified Implementation 6,000.00 6,000.00 (Includes installation, configuration, training, travel time and expenses associated with Enterprise license installation) ATTN: Ingrid Bruce For questions re this quotation, contact Thorne Bertrand 707-566-6720 x112, Sales Tax 7.25°~ 087 50 ~ °~ $1 thorne@moosepoint.com. , . Total $zz,oe7.5o P108 MoosePoint TECHNOLOGY, INC. 19229 Sonoma Highway #257 Sonoma, CA 95476-5413 707.566.6720 QUOTATION Date Quotation # 10/9/2007 RCSMyN1007 Name I Address City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Ingrid Bruce Rep Quotation Valid Until TB 12/09/2007 Description Qty Rate Total GeoSmart.net Standard Edition License 1 7,500.00 7,500.OOT (single server, multi-user, for non-commercial use) (First year maintenance included. Future years annual maintenance calculated at 20% of retail price.) My Neighborhood Smart Solution License 1 2.500.00 2,500.OOT My Neighborhood Customization (estimated -five days) 40 185.00 7,400.00 GeoSmart.net Standard and My Neighborhood 8 185.00 1,480.00 Implementation (one day on-site) Travel Expenses Associated with Implementation Day On-Site 1,045.00 1,045.00 (includes airfare, one night lodging, per diem, car rental, travel time) (estimated - actual to be billed) ATTN: Ingrid Bruce For questions re this quotation, contact Thorne Bertrand 707-566-6720 x112, S8I@S TaX ~7.ZrJ%~ $725 00 thorn e@ moosepo i nt. com. . Total $2o,s5o.oo P109 MoosePoint TECHNOLOGY, INC. 19229 Sonoma Highway #257 Sonoma, CA 95476-5413 707.566.6720 QUOTATION Date Quotation # 10/9/2007 RCAdvTr1007 Name /Address City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Ingrid Bruce Rep Quotation Valid Until TB 12/09/2007 Description Qty Rate Total Advanced Training and Development (two days on-site) 16 185.00 2,960.00 Travel Expenses for Advanced Training and Development 1,275.00 1,275.00 (Includes airfare, two nights lodging, per diem, car rental, travel time) (Estimated - actual to be billed) ATTN: Ingrid Bruce For questions re this quotation, contact Thorne Bertrand 707-566-6720 x112, S8Ii3S T8X (7.25%~ $0 00 thorne @moosepoint.com. . Total $4,235.00 P110 MoosePoint TECHNOLOGY, INC. 19229 Sonoma Highway #257 Sonoma, CA 95476-5413 707.566.6720 QUOTATION Date Quotation # 10/9/2007 RCRWA1007 Name /Address City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Ingrid Bruce Rep Quotation Valid Until TB 12/09/2007 Description Qty Rate Total Road Work Ahead Smart Solution License t 5,000.00 5,OOO.OOT Customizations for Road Work Ahead Application ~ 3,000.00 3,000.00 (Estimated -actual costs to be defined in future Scope of Work) ATTN: Ingrid Bruce For questions re this quotation, contact Thome Bertrand 707-566-6720 x112, S8I@S TeX (7.25%~ $362 50 thorne@moosepoint. com. . Tota I $6,362.50 P111 MOOSCPOIrit TECHNOLOGY, INC. 19229 Sonoma Highway #257 Sonoma, CA 95476-5413 Phone: (707) 566-6720 Fax: (707) 237-6846 City of Ranch Cucamonga Sample Scope of Work/Deliverables Basic Services Pre-Installation Telephone Conference Prior to onsite implementation, MoosePoint Technology will teleconference with the City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) team that will be supporting the GeoSmart.net/ArcIMS environment. This assures a thorough understanding of the current environment and the objectives of the implementation going forward. It also permits time to consult on anticipated changes to assure that those objectives regarding GIS and Internet applications and data are realized. The team usually consists of a network administrator, a GIS database administrator, and any additional staff responsible for the overall architecture of the network, as well as the GIS developer who will have responsibility for the GeoSmart.net environment. Installation and Configuration MoosePoint will provide services to the City of RC, which will include the installation (or upgrade) of ESRI's ArcIMS server software (if desired), and MoosePoint's GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition software on a server provided by the City of RC. These services can generally be completed in the first half day onsite, and require the presence of a network administrator to assure necessary security access, and someone familiar with GIS data sources and locations. Where necessary, changes or enhancements will be made to the Operating System, IIS Web Server, and ArcIMS configurations to permit effective utilization of future GeoSmart.net Service Packs and GeoSmart.net upgrade releases. Training Additionally, using data provided and prepared by City of RC, MoosePoint will provide one and one half (lYz) days of training to key staff as outlined below. The training objective is to enable them to do significant GIS application development for web publication, without the need for outside services. It is likely that one or more basic applications can be completed during this time. The training will consist of the following activities, designed to support GIS web development efforts: • Introduction to ArcIMS °Administrator" and 'Author" -These ArcIMS tools are used to create "Map Services" -either from existing shapefiles or SDE data layers -which will establish a common look and feel for the mapping portion of GeoSmart.net websites; • Introduction and Detailed Utilization of GeoSmart.net -This is a thorough "walk- through" of all elements of the Management Portal, with the primary focus on the Site Builder Wizard. The development of one or more applications will be used as training vehicles for City of RC staff; • Utilization of External Databases -This supports the ability to use GeoSmart.net to connect directly to ODBC compliant databases available on the network and seamlessly link them to GIS map features. P112 City of Rancho Cucamonga Sample Scope of Work/Deliverables Post Implementation Telephone Conference Within sixty (60) days of on-site implementation services, one-half (1/2) day will be available for teleconferencing with City of RC team to review implementation status, answer questions, and discuss additional applications or requirements. The objective in this conference is to assure that the team has a common understanding of the current and future application implementations, and has resolved all associated issues. This is in addition to Telephone Support provided under the Software Support Program. Data Requirements Ideally, City of RC will provide ready-to-use data in shapefiles and/or SDE, and optionally ODBC compliant database formats for use in developing the training application(s). Such "external" databases may be located on any server accessible through a network connection. Depending on complexity, a Network Administrator and/or a Database Administrator may be required to expedite connectivity and data analysis. MoosePoint staff can provide assistance in data preparation, though such efforts will limit time available to adequately address training needs. Deliverables Phase 1 • GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition installed and fully operational on City of RC web server. NOTE: The only architectural requirement for the GeoSMart.net is that it must be installed on a Windows 2000 or Windows 2003 IIS Web Server provided by City of RC. ArcIMS does not need to be on the same server; One map service will be created in ArcIMS, from the data provided, to permit the development of the "training" application(s). The application may include multiple layers and external databases. It is recommended that the initial application be of high value that can immediately enhance the value of web publishing to the organization; • One application will be completed in the time allotted. (The standard quotation provides for two (2) full days of onsite consulting assistance roughly allocated as described. As time permits, it may be used for additional application development or other GIS needs); • Management Portal User Documentation, which outlines the use of its features and functions, is delivered as a PDF file. MoosePoint TECHNOLOGY, INC. P113 City of Rancho Cucamonga Sample Scope of Work/Deliverables Deliverables Continued Phase 2 GeoSmart.net Standard Edition installed and fully operational on City of RC web server. NOTE: The only architectural requirement for the GeoSMart.net is that it must be installed on a Windows 2000 or Windows 2003 IIS Web Server provided by City of RC. ArcIMS does not need to be on the same server; My Neighborhood Smart Solution with customization installed and fully operational on a City of RC server. • GeoSmart.net Standard and My Neighborhood Implementation will be completed in the time allotted. (The standard quotation provides for 1 full day of onsite consulting assistance roughly allocated as described). Phase 3 Advanced Training and Development Advanced training and development will to be determined by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will be completed in the time allotted. (The standard quotation provides for 2 full days of onsite consulting assistance roughly allocated as described) . Phase 4 Road Work Ahead Smart Solution with customization installed and fully operational on a City of RC server (as determined by a future scope of work). Timeline • Phase 1 -October/November 2007 Phase 2 -Estimate: January -February 2008 Phase 3 -Estimate: January -February 2008 Phase 4 - Tbd INC. P114 GeoSmart.net Software Support Program Overview The goal of MoosePoint Technology support services is to promote your success with MoosePoint Technology software and carry forward your suggestions for its continuing improvement. To assure your success in using GeoSmart.net software, we offer a flexible and complete support program. In order to be eligible for software support, installations must be performed by a MoosePoint Technology certified installer. This requirement assures that telephone support, software service packs, and major version upgrades can be administered effectively without requiring onsite support. Subscription to the GeoSmart.net Support Program includes the following benefits: • Technical Support • Software Upgrades Technical Support MoosePoint Technology provides several ways to access technical support, including: • Hot Line Support during our normal operating hours • Fax Support • E-mail Support • Website Support Hot Line Suooort GeoSmart.net users within the United States may contact technical support by telephone between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time, Monday through Friday, holidays excluded. Technical support can be reached by dialing 707-566-6720. Each reported incident is given a unique identification number for referencing. After an incident is logged, the user is connected to a specialist who will work on the problem until it is resolved. If a specialist is unavailable, the call will be placed in the dispatch queue. Fax and E-Mail Suooort For users who do not wish to call in, or cannot reach technical support during our normal operation hours, fax and a-mail support is available. We accept faxes and a-mail twenty- four hours a day (however, faxes and a-mail received after hours, 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time, are handled the next business day). All incidents reported by fax and a-mail are given the same priority and support as those reported by telephone. Fax support, available at 707-566-6730, can be used for incident related correspondence. E-mail support is available through support@moosepoint.com. Website Suooort In many instances the information available in the support section of our Website provides solutions to a variety of questions. It is recommended as a first option of resolution. For more information regarding its content, please visit: http://www.geosmart.net/support. 1 1/1/2003 MOOSCPOIIlt Software Support Program TECHNULUGY, INC. P115 GeoSmart.net Software Support Program Preparing for Support When you call MoosePoint Technology for technical support, you should always be at your computer and have the appropriate software documentation on hand. Be prepared to give the following information: • Your software and version number • Your install number (appears on invoice and packing slip) • The type of hardware you are using • The exact wording of any messages that appear on your screen • What happened and what you were doing when the problem occurred • How you tried to solve the problem Resolution Time The time required to answer a question and resolve a problemvaries depending on the type of problem and whether we are able to reproduce it at our site. Usually we are able to answer questions and suggest solutions to problems on the same day we receive them, often immediately. If research or consultation with another specialist is required, a complete response may take two or three working days. Under rare circumstances, it may take longer. If the problem turns out to be coding or documentation error for which there is no work-around, resolution may have to wait for a future programming modification. Usually, we can clarify documentation issues and provide a satisfactory work-around. Software Upgrades The GeoSmart.net team is constantly researching and developing new mapping and interface functionality. These enhancements are available as major upgrades. There are also minor updates we make available to improve pertormance or correct error conditions. Users who subscribe to annual maintenance will receive software upgrades free of charge. Support Policy MoosePoint Technology support services for GeoSmart.net are subject to the terms and limitations listed below. General Terms To be eligible for GeoSmart.net support services, users should be aware of, and adhere to the following terms: • You must register each GeoSmart.net software installation with MoosePoint Technology. One (1) installation and one Support Program authorization are permitted for each GeoSmart.net license. Follow the instructions with your software. • Your first full year of participation in the GeoSmart.net Support Program is included with your initial license of GeoSmart.net software and extends for 12 months from the date of purchase. Thereafter, the Support Program must be renewed annually, payable in advance based on the date of purchase, to continue support services. If 2 1/1/2003 MO05CPOolI~~ Ne Software Support Program P116 GeoSmart.net Software Support Program additional software licenses are purchased, the support program renewal fees will be prorated to the same date. Prices and terms are subject to change without notice. Fees are based on the rates in effect at the time payment is due, and are nonrefundable. Subscribers to the GeoSmart.net Support Program must subscribe for all GeoSmart.net software licensed by the subscriber. • Should there be a lapse in payment, all past due fees must be paid to restart service. Once a new software release or data update is installed and verified, please return to MoosePoint Technology or destroy all previous versions of the software, data, and documentation. Remember that the previous version remains subject to the terms of the GeoSmart.net software license and may not be transferred to any other person or entity. Limitations Users should be aware of the following limitations regarding support services for GeoSmart.net: ^ MoosePoint Technology technical support is limited to unmodified MoosePoint Technology software. ^ MoosePoint Technology technical support is limited to one authorized contact per server/CPU license covered by support services. • MoosePoint Technology technical support is not a replacement for adequate training. Customized training and documentation services are available from MoosePoint Technology or their business partners at an additional cost. ^ Developer support is not included in standard technical support. Developer support provides support for advanced customization and development. Developer support services are available from MoosePoint Technology or their business partners at an additional cost. MoosePoint Technology does not provided technical support for hardware, graphic cards, monitors, printer, modems nor other computer hardware except to answer questions of how standard, supported devices intertace to GeoSmart.net software. MoosePoint Technology does not provide technical support for other applications that may interface with GeoSmart.net. • The terms and conditions of this policy are subject to change by MoosePoint Technology without written notice. ~.I 3 1/1/2003 rsn~MOOSP,~Oo ctiev.ir~c. Software Support Program P117 Internet/Intranet Environment System Configuration Option One In this configuration, ArcIMS and GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition are installed on a single server deployed within a DMZ. ArcSDE and DBMS Systems are deployed on additional servers within the maternal network. ArcIMS would connect to ArcSDE through the firewall (default port 5151). If desired, GeoSmart.net would access DBMS databases (ArcSDE and other) through the firewall. This entry level system is intended for small organizations expecting m~imal public traffic. In the future, additional GeoSmart.net servers (Enterprise or Standard) can be deployed within the DMZ to handle increasing web traffic. Advantages: e Minimize software/hardware costs e Simplified maintenance with single server environment Disadvantages: e Performance will likely not be acceptable when serving complex applications or high traffic from the Internet e No development environment e Less secure than other options A simplified diagram of this configuration is shown below: mtemet, DMZ 0 Singla 6erver , ~. ~ArciMS'and'. ~~ QeoSmarl.net£Merprlse EtlitfonJ Ex[emal Flrowall Intarnel Firewall Atltlltlonal D8M3 ServarJs) 1 3/4/2004 MOOSePblllf System Configuration Options TECHNOLOGY, INC. P118 Internet/Intranet Environment System Configuration Option Two In this configuration, ArcIMS and GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition are installed on separate servers deployed within a DMZ. ArcSDE and DBMS Systems are deployed on additional servers within the internal network. ArcIMS would connect to ArcSDE through the firewall (default port 5151). If desired, GeoSmart.net would access additional DBMS databases through the firewall. In the future, additional GeoSmart.net servers (Enterprise or Standard) can be deployed within the DMZ to handle increasing web trafFc. Advantages: • Minimize software costs • Improved performance and scalability Disadvantages: • Increased hardware costs • Maintaining multiple server environment adds complexity • No development environment • Less secure than other options A simplified diagram of this configuration is shown below: Internet, DMZ.' ® ~ INTERNAL NETWORK o Deo9mert.net Server ArdMB Server(s)' _ (Enterprise Etlitlon) ArtSDE Serverysj External Internal o Firawall Firewall c °o Atltlitional DBMS Server(s) 2 3/4/2004 MOf1~~Iotllocr, Irtc. System Configuration Options P119 Internet/tntranet Environment System Configuration Option Three In this configuration, GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition is installed on single server deployed within a DMZ. ArcIMS, ArcSDE and DBMS Systems are deployed on additional servers within the internal network. GeoSmart.net would connect to ArcIMS through the firewall (default port 5300). If desired, GeoSmart.net would access additional DBMS databases through the firewall. In the future, additional GeoSmart.net servers (Enterprise or Standard) can be deployed within the DMZ to handle increasing web traffic. Advantages• • Minimize software costs Improved performance and scalability • Improved Security Disadvantages: Increased hardware costs • Maintaining multiple server environment adds complexity • No development environment A simplified diagram of this configuration is shown below: inteme4 Estemal Firewall DMZ 0 0 GaoSmart.netServer (Enmrprisa Edition) -' Internal Firewall INTERNAL NETWORK C. AkIM3 Server(s) AroSDE Server(s) ; 0 °o 0 Adtlltlonel DBMS Server(s) 3 3/4/2004 MODSP~Oanocr,lNC. System Configuration Options P120 Internet/Intranet Environment System Configuration Option Four In this configuration, GeoSmart.net Standard Edition is installed on a single server deployed within a DMZ. GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition, ArcIMS, ArcSDE and DBMS Systems are deployed on additional servers within the internal network. GeoSmart.net Standard Edition would connect to ArcIMS through the firewall (default port 5300). If desired, GeoSmart.net Standard Edition would access additional DBMS databases through the firewall. In the future, additional GeoSmart.net servers (Enterprise or Standard) can be deployed within the DMZ to handle increasing web traffic. Advantages: Improved performance and scalability Improved Security Development environment separate from product environment Disadvantages: • Increased software/hardware costs Maintaining multiple server environment adds complexity A simplified diagram of this configuration is shown below: _. 3~.:u Internet. External Flraaall 4 3/4/2004 ~MOO5CPIDIIIt System Configuration Options 7ECH1JRL4GY, INC. DMZ " I~ C GeoSmart.net Sarver (Standard Edition) Internal Firewell INTERNAL NETWORK o ArcIMS.Sarver(s) ~' AreSDE Server(s).. C L GaoSmert m Sarver (Enlerpdaa Edltlon) Server(s) P121 Recommended Minimum Hardware/Software Configuration for GeoSmart.net Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition in an Internet Environment • Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2003 Server including latest Service Packs with Internet Information Server (IIS) installed • Dual Intel Xeon Processors (2.5 GHz or higher) • 2GBRAM • 2x 100 Mbps or Gigabit Ethernet Network Cards • GeoSmart.net Version 4.x • Microsoft SQL Server 2000 or Microsoft Database Engine (MSDE 2000) including latest Service Packs (MSDE 2000 is included with GeoSmart.net) • Recommended disk configuration: Dual 18 GB drives in mirrored or RAID 5 configuration. Required disk space for Operating System and all software listed above is less than 2 GB. • Recommended System Vendors: HP/Compaq or Dell Note: MoosePoint Technology recommends the above specification as minimum requirements. This configuration is designed for entry level application development and support. The number of applications and amount of web traffic will affect the performance of any web server. Installation of ArcIMS or other software on the same server will also affect performance. ~I 5 3/4/2004 ~S n IMOps~oiacv, iwc. System Configuration Options P122 HOURLY FEE RATE SCHEDULE January 1, 2007 Professional services performed on atime-and-materials basis shall be invoiced at the following rates. Rates reflected are hourly. GENERAL SERVICES Pri n ci pa I $225.00 Senior Application Developer $195.00 Senior Consultant $180.00 Consultant $165.00 Project Manager $175.00 Systems Analyst $165.00 System Administration, DBA $125.00 GIS RELATED SERVICES GIS Analyst $165.00 GIS Specialist $125.00 OTHER SERVICES Litigation Consultant/Expert Witness $225.00 Clerical/Miscellaneous Office Work $50.00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES The following services will be billed at cost plus 15% unless otherwise noted. Rental Eauioment and Fees: Equipment rental costs or any other fees incurred by our firm. Commercial Delivery Services: Including Express Mail, Federal Express, UPS, and independent courier services. In-House Pick-Uo and Delivery Services: These services provided by our firm will be reimbursed at $50.00 per hour. In addition, mileage will be billed at $0.485 per mile with no markup. Travel Expenses: Mileage driven to and from the job site will be billed at a rate of $0.485 per mile with no markup. Travel time will be billed at one-half (1/2) time per hour, per person with no markup. Airfare will be billed at cost plus 5%. per Diem: Per Diem for overnight stays will be billed at $55.00 per day, per person. Hotels and car rentals will be billed at cost. Note: Invoicing will be submitted on a percentage of completion or a monthly progressive cycle. '~'~. II 1/1/2007 ><n I M00SCP01111 Fee Rate Schedule ~~~~,IIII TECHNOLOGY, INC. P123 CO #07-193 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS INSTALLATION AND TRAINING This Agreement is made and entered into this 8's day of October, 2007, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and MoosePoint Technology, Inc., a California company (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). A. Recitals. (i) CONSULTANT has submitted its proposal for the performance of MoosePoint Applications software installation and training, a full, true and correct of which the MoosePoint proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference made a part hereof. (ii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY and staff in the preparation of Project. (iii) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Project: The performance of MoosePoint Applications software installation and training described in Exhibit "A" hereto including, but not limited to, the development of innovative GIS solutions and GIS-related information to City users on the Intranet using web-based ArcIMS applications and to the public with a focus on neighborhoods including the My Neighborhood Smart Solution and Roadwork Ahead Smart Solution on the Internet. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, training and implementation of items as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" hereto and all in accordance with Federal, State and CITY 1 P124 CO #07-193 statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all applications and documentation (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Exhibit "A". The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section B2. (b) may be extended upon written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $55.335.00 segregated as follows: Phase 1. - $22,087.50 for Geosmart.net Enterprise Edition License, application, implementation and training; Phase 2.- $20,650.00 for Geosmart.net Standard Edition License, the My Neighborhood Application, implementation and training; Phase 3.- $4,235.00 for advanced training and development and Phase 4.- $8,362.50 for MoosePoint Roadwork Ahead Smart Solution License, implementation and training for the Intranet and Internet for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after CITY receives said invoices. All charges shall be in accordance with CONSULTANT's proposal either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 75% of individual task totals described in Exhibit "A". (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 75% for each phased deliverable of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by 2 P125 CO #07-193 shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in said Exhibit "A". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after CITY receives said invoices. (e) The City reserves the right to, on a yearly basis, review and approve standard annual increases (not to exceed the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA Area) or additional services recommended by MoosePoint Technology, Inc. or requested by the City. (f) This agreement shall be effective from the date of execution, with an on-going annual maintenance fee as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. 4. CITY a erg es toprovide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (c) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, models, and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "A", on a pro-rata basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, models and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this Paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: 3 P126 CO #07-193 CITY: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services CONSULTANT: Tim McGee, President Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, bymail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall not commence work under this contract until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Contract the following policies of insurance: (a) Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the Contractor shall furnish to the CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom the CONSULTANT may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. Further, such policy of insurance shall provide that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against CITY and its elected officials, officers, employees and agents. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of work of this contract." (b) For all operations of the CONSULTANT or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: (1) Commercial General Liability (occurrence) -for bodily injury, death and 4 P127 CO #07-193 property damage for products/completed operations and any and all other activities undertaken by the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement - - or -- (2) (Alternative to Commercial Genera] Liability) -Comprehensive, broad form Genera] Public liability (occurrence) -for bodily injury, death and property damage arising out of any activities undertaken by CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. (3) Comprehensive Automobile Liability (occurrence) -for bodily injury, death and property damage insuring against all liability arising out of the use of any vehicle. (4) Other required insurance, endorsements or exclusions as required by the request for proposal. (5) The policies of insurance required in this Section b shall have no less than the following limits of coverage: (i) $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars) for bodily injury or death; (ii) $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars) for property damage. (iii) The total of the limits specified in subsections (i) and (ii), above, where a combined single limit is provided. (c) The policies of insurance required in subsections (1), and (2) and (3) of Section b., above, shall: (1) Be subj ect to no deductible amount unless otherwise provided, or approved in writing by CITY; (2) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by CITY, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated "A" (seven) or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide; (3) Names as additional insured, the CITY, it elected officials, officers, employees, attorneys and agents, and any other parties, including subcontractors, specified by CITY to be included; (4) Specify that it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insured's shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; (5) Specify that it applies separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability; (6) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by CITY of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by P128 CO #07-193 receipt of a registered letter." (7) Specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided; (8) Specify that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against any of the named additional insureds; and (9) Specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (10) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to CITY. (d) Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the CITY before CONSULTANT commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one (1) year, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 9. Indemnification: Other than in the performance of professional services and to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold free and harmless CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers from and against all tort liability, including liability for claims, suits, actions, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorney's fees incurred by CITY, court costs, interest and defense costs including expert witness fees, where the same arise out of, or are connected with, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by CONSULTANT, or any of CONSULTANT'S officers, agents, employees or contractors, and which result in bodily injury or property damage to any individual or entity, including the employees or officials of CONSULTANT. In addition to the foregoing, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold free and harmless CITY, its elected officials, officers and employees from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the extent the same are caused by negligence of CONSULTANT, or any of CONSULTANT'S officers, agents, employees or contractors, in the performance of professional services pursuant to this Agreement. 6 P129 CO #07-193 10. Assi ngnment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employees, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Pursuant to California Administrative Code, Title 8, Group 3, Payment of Prevailing Wages Upon Public Works, updated March, 1986, Art 2, "Work Subject to Prevailing Wages", sub-paragraph (C) "Field Surveying Projects: Field survey work traditionally covered by collective bargaining agreements is subject to prevailing wage rates when it is integral to the specific public work project in the design, preconstruction, or construction phase." 14. Attorne, 'sue: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 15. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party, which is not embodied herein, nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. 7 CO #07-193 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: MoosePoint Technology Inc. Tim McGee President CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A Municipal Corporation P130 John R. Gillison Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services P131 STAFF REPORT ~-- 1 ; ENGINEERIV•G DEPdR'I'MENT RANCHO Date: October 17, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineeri}.~/ Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $800,000 TO DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000 FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL FROM GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE (PHASES 4a AND 4b), AND THE VISTA PARK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EAST OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, TO BE FUNDED FROM BERAUTIFICATION FEES, ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1615110-0, PARK DEVELOPMENT FEES, ACCOUNT NOS. 11203055650/1544120-0 & 1 1 20305 56 50/1 61 51 20-0, AND 2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 26608015650/1189660-0; AND APPROPRIATE AN AMOUNT OF $475,000 TO ACCOUNT NO. 2660801 56 50/1 1 8966 0-0 FROM 2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Dan Guerra and Associates to provide civil, landscape and trail lighting design services for the construction of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail improvements for Phases 4a & 4b between Grove Avenue and Amethyst Avenue, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto, and to approve an appropriation in the amount of $475,000 from 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Fund Balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail, extending throughout the City has been broken into a series of phases to accommodate the funding and construction of the trail. Three such phases, Phases 1, 2 and 3 -extending from Amethyst Avenue to 1,320 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, is nearing completion of construction. Phase 5, from east of Etiwanda Avenue to the east City boundary at the I-15 Freeway has been designed and is awaiting a Caltrans permit for work within their right-of-way. Construction of this phase is expected to begin next spring. The last two phases, Phase 4a from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue, and Phase 4b from Vineyard Avenue to Amethyst Avenue will complete the trail throughout the City. Because of the unique design challenges associated with these two phases it was decided to combine the two together. The design of these two remaining segments will include, along with the trail; a trailhead in the vicinity of Vineyard Avenue; Vista Park which fronts onto Foothill Boulevard just east of the old railroad bridge crossing Foothill Boulevard; points of access between the Cucamonga Creek trail system and the Pacific Electric trail; trail lighting throughout the trail; and landscaping at Grove Avenue, Hellman P132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT W/DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES -PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL FROM GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE OCTOBER 17, 2007 PAGE 2 Avenue, Base Line Road, and Amethyst Avenue. Staff has been in touch with the County Museum for the possibility of teaming up to share the parking lot at the Rains House for the trailhead. The design must also address the severe grade issues as the trail winds around Red Hill. The proposal from Dan Guerra and Associates met all of the City's requirements in an amount of $800,000 to be funded from Account Nos. 1 1 1 031 65650/1 61 51 1 0-0 (Beautification Fees), 11203055650/1544120-0 & 11203055650/1615120-0 (Park Development Fees), and 26608015650/1189660-0 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Funds). The firm has provided design services for other phases of the trail and is uniquely aware of the problems inherent to the site. The firm has a great deal of information already generated in their records that will be used for this project. submitted, ~~ l~ Iliam J. O'Neil y Engineer WJO:WCS:Is Attachments f~~~ r' ~ ------°--•----- --- --- ------~ --°--- ~1 i HILLSI E RD ILL IDER I I w N ILSO AV I WIL ON AV LSON ~V EEC ~I ~ ¢ ~ ~` d y w y I~ I ~ BAfJY N ST ~ \ N \ w w 1 210 HI I O FW 1 21 z w < ~ < V x CTORI U ` y ~ _J ~ _ ~~ ~ B SELI E R -tl' -- '~ BASE IN R . i ~a ~` ~` ¢ CHU CHS ~ ~ CHUI CHS ~ ~ ~/ ~ f ~% ~ F OTH BL ~- . = w < /~ o RRO ¢ JERSEY BL ~ 8 H ST < _ I 7 HST ~ 6TH ST --- i HST r a 4TH S O N PROJECT P133 Vicinity Map Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Phases 4a and 4b Grove Ave to Amethyst Ave P134 :~ <3 T H E ANCftO CUCAMONGA StaffRepOTt DATE: October 17, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVALOFANAMINDMENTTOTHEJOINTCOMMUNITIFSFAC'ti.17'1FS AGRF.IIVIENTBY AND AMONG THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT AND RANCHO 2004, LLC AS IT RELATES TO THE FORMATION OF THE HENDERSON CREEK PUBLIC FACILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 OF THE ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Amendment to the Joint Communities Facilities Agreement (JCFA) by and among the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Etiwanda School District (the School District) and Rancho 2004, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Owner) as it relates to the formation of the Henderson Creek Public Facilities Community Facilities District No. 2004-2 (the District) of the Etiwanda School District. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On January 13a' 2005 the City entered into a JCFA with the School District and the Owner during the formation of the District. The purpose of the JCFA was to establish the terms and conditions pursuant to which Owner would be reimbursed for the cost of construction of the improvements if the improvements were, in fact, constructed by them. The amendment will merely modify the timing of payment for the street improvements excluding the street lights. It will not affect any obligation that the Owner has to the City to install the street lights. The Engineering Department has confirmed that the City has entered into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement that creates a contractual obligation for the Owner to install the street lights and the installation is guazanteed by the subdivision improvement bonds posted P135 by the Owner. The Owner has made anon-refundable payment to SCE for the installation of the street lights. Res lly submitted, John R. Gillison Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Attachments: Amendment 2- P136 AMENDMENT TO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into effective as of the 10`s day of October, 2007, by and among the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a city duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the "City"), the ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public entity (the School District"), and RANCHO 2004, LLC, a Delawaze limited liability company (the "Owner"), and relates to the formation of the HENDERSON CREEK PUBLIC FACILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 OF THE ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT (the "District"). RECITALS A. The City, the School District, and the Owner entered into that certain Joint Community Facilities Agreement effective as of January 13, 2005 relating to the District (the "Agreement"). B. The City, the School District, and the Owner desire to amend the Agreement to eliminate completion of street lighting from the determination of substantial completion of the roadway improvements. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, iri consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The last sentence of the first pazagraph of Section 9 of the Agreement hereby is deleted and replaced with the following: Roadway improvements shall be considered "substantially complete" upon completion of all curb to curb improvements, excluding the final asphalt cap and sidewalks. 2. Owner shall reimburse City for all costs incurred by the City in the review and approval of this Amendment as a precondition to the payment of the acquisition price of any street included among the City Acquisition Facilities. 3. This Amendment shall not relieve Owner of its obligation to install street lights within the Property as requested by the Conditions of Approval of the development of the Property or any agreement by and between the City and the Owner. 4. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 5. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute but one instrument. P137 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment to Joint Community Facilities Agreement as of the date first set forth above. "SCHOOL DISTRICT" ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT By: ~~ ~._ Its: ~~_ By: OF BUSINESS SERVICES Its: "CITY" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Its: By: Its: "OWNER" RANCHO 2004, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Granite Homes, Inc., a California corporation, Its Manager -{ By: ^'C Its: Co-President 2 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP_~RTnIENT RANCHO Date: October 17, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Michael TenEyck, Utility Operations Manager Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE RANCHO CROSSING 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, CABLING, CONNECTIONS AND EQUIPMENT PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE I-15 FREEWAY, CONTRACT NO. 07-017, ACCEPT THE PROJECT AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $48,956.02, APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $126,774.57 AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,174.17 TO ACCOUNT NO. 17053035650/1397705-0 FROM MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract change order in the amount of $48,956.02 for the Rancho Crossing 12 KV Electrical Distribution System, Cabling, Connections and Equipment Project, Contract No. 07-017, accept the project as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $77,818.55 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $12,677.46, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $126,774.57 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $41,174.17 to Account No. 17053035650/1397705-0 from Municipal Utility Fund Balance BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Rancho Crossing 12 KV Electrical Distribution System, Cabling, Connections and Equipment Project scope of work consisted of constructing a complete electrical distribution system including cable and equipment, and surface restoration. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: i Account Numbers: $85,600 17053035650/1397705-0 P138 ~ Engineer's Estimate: $67,995.00 P139 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: RANCHO CROSSING 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, CABLING, CONNECTIONS AND EQUIPMENT PROJECT October 17, 2007 Page 2 - City Council's Approval to Advertise: December 20, 2006 - Publish dates for local paper: December 26, 2006 & January 2, 2007 - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: - Low Bidder: - Contract Amount: - 10% Contingency: - Final Contract Amount: - Difference in Contract Amount: January 16, 2007 February 7, 2006 Pouk & Steinle, Inc. $77,818.55 $7,781.86 $126,774.57 $48,956.02 62.91% The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of one (1) contract change order. The notable changes that were significant to the increase of Contract Change Order No. 1 were the additional refurbished transformers. The transformers were needed to expedite the project in order to accommodate the construction schedule. The new contracted transformers were not available during the construction period; therefore, they will be stored as back-ups. ully submitted, Wi iam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MT/SH:Is Attachment P1 PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIviONGA RANCHO CROSSING E2 I;V ELECTRICAL DLSTRIBUTION SFSTEM SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHIIb BLVD EAST OF DAY CRESS BLVD tl ~~~1V P i J. 1NZ~~ P141 RESOLUTION NO. O ~' Z y d A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE RANCHO CROSSING 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, CABLING, CONNECTIONS AND EQUIPMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-017, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Rancho Crossing 12 KV Electrical Distribution System, Cabling, Connections and Equipment Project, Contract No. 07-017, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP_~1RTMENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II P142 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DRC2003-00719, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DRC2003-00719 were approved by the City Counci] on August 17, 2005, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 79,200.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 39,600.00 Due to a delay with an agreement with Caltrans to do the off site improvements, the construction has been delayed. The developer, Pacific Globe, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, Q~~~,~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TLV Attachments PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC. 1639 West Foothill Blvd., Upland, Ca 91786: Phone (909) 949-2611: Fax (909) 949-6551 September 18, 2007 Attention: Tasha Hunter Engineering Tech The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Subject :Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC 2003-00719 Dear Ms., The intent of this letter is to request an extension on the improvement agreement. The extension is based on the fact that recently the city of Rancho Cucamonga came to an agreement with Caltrans to do the offsite improvement. Attached to this document is a check to cover the processing fee of $298. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (909) 239-1718 Cordially yours, Behrooz Mirshafiee Secretary Pacific Globe, LLC. P143 P144 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ~~~~ ~~ VICIiyITY 1VIAp 21, 0 ¢ FREEVdAY AVE ~ Q 0 0 J F~ IQ ~An ! ~ w U BLVD. NTS City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION sr. /P-l ~~ 2~" ~~ i. Item: DRC2003-00719 Title: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT; 1 P145 RESOLUTION NO. ('7 ~ LI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-00719 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 2007, by Pacific Globe, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of--way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2003-00719; and WHEREAS, said -Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP_jRTbLENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II P146 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16882, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16882 were approved by the City Council on October 18, 2006, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 517,500.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 517,500.00 Currently the project is under construction and the completion is near. The developer, Lewis Investment Company, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitte~d~, ri~C~a~'~' `tel. Will am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TLV Attachments Lewis Operating Corp. I I5G Norch Mountain Avenue / P. O. Box 670 /Upland, California 91785-0670 Telephone: (909)985-0971 FAX: (909)949-6700 September 19, 2007 Trina Valdez City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 RE: Improvement Agreement Extension for TRACT 16882 Dear Ms. Valdez: ® e~ P147 1'I ~ ~ ~ ~ V SEP 24 Zu07 CITY t~F RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION We are currently completing work on TRACT 16882 and Foothill Boulevard was slightly delayed. We anticipate completion of work shortly. Therefore, we would like to request an extension on the Improvement Agreement for TRACT 16882. If you should have any questions or require any additional information please feel free to contact me at (909) 946-7537 or via email at brVan.goodman(c~lewisop.com. Regards, ~ ~ ll an T. Goodman ice President -Planned Community Development P148 15 MILLER AVE 3 ~ PROJECT SITE FOOTHILL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 O z 0 v N TITLE: V/C'~~ILLy /~~ ENGINEERING DIVISION P149 RESOLUTION NO. O7-z1IZ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16882 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 2007, by Lewis Investment Company, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16882; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTD'IENT IL~1 Date: October 17, 2007 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DRC2002-00322, LOCATED AT WHIRLAWAY -AND TOLSTOY RANCH ROAD, SUBMITTED BY JESSE ASH It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DRC2002-00322 were approved by the City Council on August 16, 2006, in the following amounts: Faithful Perfonnance Bond: $ 44,700.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 44,700.00 Due to legal matters involving the water pipe line on the property, construction has been delayed. The developer, Jesse Ash, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, Wi liam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TLV P150 Attachments P151 September 20, 2007 Ms. Tasha Hunter Engineering Tech. ]0500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 C/O Trina Engineering Tech. Reference: Tasha Hunter memo dated August 27, 2007, and my telephone conversation with you in regards To an extension for DRC2002-00322. Deaz Trina: I Jesse Ash is requesting an extension on DRC2002-00322 Improvement Agreement, due to legal action I have to take due to a water pipe line on my property. I hope that this problem will be taken care of as soon as possible. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me @ (909) 599-0323 or my Cell @ (213) 276-0591. Sincere , z- J e Ash Property Owner & Developer C/C: Lincoln General Insurance Company: 701 "B" Stree[, # 2100, San Diego, Ca 92101 Attachments: Extension request letter and signed Improvement Agreement Extension (2 Copies) P152 ; Vicinity Map DRC2002-00322 u (~ ~'- - ~, r~-rr-iTT~ T ~r 1 l--T/1 I - N W E P153 RESOLUTION NO. d 7-Z X13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00322 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 2007, by Jesse Ash, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of--way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at Whirlaway and Tolstoy Ranch Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2002-00322; and WHEREAS, said hmprovement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPdRTb'IENT Date: October 17, 2007 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. ONeil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT NOS. 17487 AND 17840, LOCATED SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET AND EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY SHEA HOMES, LP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract Nos. 17487 and 17840 were approved by the City Council on September 20, 2006, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 200,400.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 200,400.00 The required improvements under the agreement have not yet been completed. The developer, Shea Homes, LP, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, G~~i~~`~ " `' Will' m J. O'Nei] City Engineer WJO:TLV P154 Attachments P155 `'N E~EBRATINGF 125 ~y EA RIS S C SheaHomes Caring since z88i 9/2/07 To: Trina Valdez City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 RE• Request for Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 17487 and 17840 Dear Ms. Valdez: Please accept this letter as our written request to extend the Improvement Agreement on Tract 17487 and 17840. The reason for this request is to allow Shea Homes more time to complete all required improvements under the agreement. Sincerely, Eric Ch ~- (951)739-9712 1250 Coronn Point/ Cater state ono Cormta, CA 93879 Shrn Homa Limited Parnimhrp t5' Shea Homet Marketing Company , me.y.~e.~~ m.mn.,, ~/d,. sn.,, f m;{r of~m~,,,,;., ':~ ~, '151.739.9700 r 951.738.1758 i ~~ C .., `. -, Shea xomes VICTORIA GARDENS ~_,~~~ „~e, ~,,- RANCHO CUCAMONGA (Sl18TT1){807 end URCZ003-0001) AuO..~t 3. 2003 R~N1~E - OC{OC~f ~~~ 3003 U:\SHBI' 'oria Gsdens\TC\MSchemalic\L-1-0anceplual landscape Plan 20050729.dwp, T1ItAD" " 1:35:75 PM ~~ m Conceptuollandscape Plun l-1 ~ - ~ _ C7) P157 RESOLUTION NO. O /" ~ y7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT NOS. 17487 AND 17840 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 2007, by Shea Homes, LP, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of--way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located south of Church Street and east of Day Creek Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract Nos. 17487 and 17840; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. P158 STAFF REPORT ~- ~ 7 - ENGINEERING DEP_~RTnIENT RANCHO Date: October 17, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16311, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY CRESTWOOD CORPORATION. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16311 were approved by the City Council on September 21, 2005, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 968,100.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 484,050.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 4,750.00 Construction has been delayed because of the plan check and approval process by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control and the Army Corp of Engineers for the storm drain improvement plans. The developer, Crestwood Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on the said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Res~vely su Wi~am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TLV/rlc Attachments P159 ~,; , , $ ~'restwoocC Corporation ~~ BUILDERS -LAND DEVELOPERS September 26, 2007 Trina Valdez, Engineering Technician City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Tract 16311 -Improvement agreement extension request. Ms. Valdez, Crestwood Communities would like to officially request an extension of the Improvement Agreement already in place for tract 16311. Construction of the project has been delayed due to the plan check and approval process of the storm drain improvement plans. Unfortunately, the approval of the plans by both the County of San Bernazdino Flood Control Division and the Anny Corp of Engineers has taken considerably more time than anticipated. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this agreement extension request. Sincerely, ~' rick J. Diaz Crestwood Communities 510 West Citrus Edge Street, Glendora, California 91740 Off: (626) 914-1943 Fax: (626) 335-9320 www.crestwoodcommu nities.com P160 I j i I ~, I l N P161 RESOLUTION NO. Q7-~yS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16311. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 2007, by Crestwood Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in the said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16311; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the said Improvement Agreement Extension and the said Improvement Security be the same, are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTb1ENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DRC2004-01244, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND RED OAK DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH RECOMMENDATION It is reconmrended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DRC2004-01244 were approved by the City Council on August 2, 2006, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 135,100.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 135,100.00 Currently the project is still under construction and the improvements are close to being complete. The developer, Abundant Living Family Church, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, ~~~~~~~ W' liam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TLV P162 Attachments P163 RECEIVE OCT 0 9 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION 9369 Uriea :4vznue, Surte ~l ii, Raadio Cucamonga, CA 9/'.30. l909J 987-717(1, Diego dJes'n, Seeiur Pos~or October 1, 2007 Engineering Department Rancho Cucamonga, California To Whom It May Concern: We are requesting an extension of our Improvement Agreement permit due to the building project going beyond one year. If you need further information, please give me a call (909) 459-9700. Sincerely, ~,a-x.12 Diego Mes Project Manager ~~zt/°-~,---_ Abundant Living Family Church l mn c'unte dear thc.r mr;;nr Lui-r~ life, mn/ ilru/ They mi,gh! havr i1 mnrr abundunl ~t Jblm /0:10 P164 CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAM0IVGA ENGINEERING DMSiON ITEM: ~~®~°~ TITI_,E: -~~ P165 RESOLUTION N0. O7- 2y~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2004-01244 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 2007, by Abundant Living Family Church, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of--way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast comer of Civic Center Drive and Red Oak Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2004-01244; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said hmprovement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. STAFF REPORT ENGINE-..EKING DEPARTMENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: ' Curt Billings, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer '; RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE ALMOND BOX CULVERT EAST OF HERMOSA, CONTRACT NO. 07- 076 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $272,920.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Almond Box Culvert east of Hermosa, Contract No. 07-076, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $255,000 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and .authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $27,292.00, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $272,920.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Almond Box Culvert east of Hermosa scope of work consisted of constructing a 12' x 5' reinforced concrete box, removing existing reinforced concrete pipes, trench repair, replacing curb and gutters, community trails, constructing headwalls and wingwalls, and replacing all improvements. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $336,000.00 Account Numbers: 1 1 1 230356 50/1 599 1 1 2-0, 13903035650(1599390-0 Engineer's Estimate: $233,250.00 City Council's Approval to Advertise: May 2, 2007 Publish dates for local paper: May 9, 2007 and May 15, 2007 Bid Opening: May 22, 2007 Contract Award Date: June 6, 2007 P166 P167 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Almond Box Culvert East of Hermosa October 17, 2007 Page 2 Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: Grand Pacific Contractors, Inc. $255,000.00 $25,500.00 $272,920.00 X17,920 (7.03%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of two (2) contract change orders (including Balancing Statement). The notable change that was significant to the increase of the Contract provided for the contractor to furnish and install rip rap on both inlet and outlet ends of box, cut off wall on outlet end and pipe gate on Hermosa. Respect ully submitted, , ~ ~ ~~~~~' Willi m J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CB:SH/Is Attachment P168 ONTARIO CITY LIMIT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ALMOND BOX CULVERT VICINITY MAP N L__I NTS P169 RESOLUTION NO. O7- Zy / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ALMOND BOX CULVERT EAST OF HERMOSA, CONTRACT NO. 07-076, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Almond Box Culvert east of Hermosa, Contract No. 07-076, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP.jRTD1ENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer B}': Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2003-00213, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, NORTH OF 4TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY FAIRMONT HOSPITALITY RFfiOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit, for DRC2003-00213, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, north of 4th Street, submitted by Fairmont Hospitality BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Release: Fairmont Hospitality 17100 Pioneer Boulevard, #400 Artesia, CA 90702 Maintenance Cash Deposit #CR095003 58,150.00 Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TLV P170 Attachment P171 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Clty Of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING Item: DRC2003-00213 Title: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: 1 DIVISION STAFF REPORT I_NGINEERING DEPA RTn[ENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer~~~jL Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engine ~~ ~i ~-- , RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6205455, WHICH WAS HELD ON OCTOBER 4, 2006 AS A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,091,488.00, FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-078 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 6205455, which was held on October 4, 2006 as a Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $1,091,488.00 for the Base Line Road Traffic Signal Interconnect, Contract No. 03-078. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Steiny and Company 12907 East Garvey Avenue P.O. Box 8100 Baldwin Park, CA 91706-0993 Respectfully submitted, Wil' m J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JD/SH:Is P172 Attachments ion System for Base Line Road ~~~ ~~~ fM V W Traffic Signal Interconnect STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP_~RTb1ENT Date: October 17, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Tech. II RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16466 LOCATED NORTH OF BANYAN STREET. BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND BLUEGRASS AVENUES ,SUBMITTED BY CARRIAGE ESTATES III, LLC RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 16466 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16466, located north of Banyan Street between Etiwanda and Bluegrass Avenues, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Carriage Estates III, LLC: 11080 Elm Avenues, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # SU501247 $836,900.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # SU5012847-A $83,900.00 (Bond No.) Respe idly submitted, Wil ~am J. 'Net City Engineer WJO:TLV P174 Attachment(s) P175 TTM 16466 a ~s~a~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENCWEERINC D[ViSfON N ITEM: ~Cr/6•~e~j~ TITLE: ~~//V~ /y~f P176 RESOLUTION NO. O7 ZYO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16466 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16466 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P177 ORDINANCE NO. 782 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ANIMALS WHICH HABITUALLY MAKE NOISE, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS, AND RABIES VACCINATIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows SECTION 1: Chapter 6.02 of Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by deleting Section 32.0119 of Chapter 1 of Division 2 of Title 3 (Animals Which Habitually Make Noise) of the San Bernardino County Code, and Chapter 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 (Potentially Dangerous and Vicious Animals) of the San Bernardino County Code, as previously adopted by reference; provided, however, that such deletion shall not affect or excuse any violation of said section or chapter occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Anew Section 6.02.030 is hereby added to Chapter 6.02 of Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "6.02.030 Rabies Vaccination. Veterinarians who vaccinate pets owned by City of Rancho Cucamonga residents shall provide rabies vaccination information and/or copies of rabies vaccination certificates to the Animal Care and Services Department upon request." SECTION 3: Anew Section 6.02.040 is hereby added to Chapter 6.02 of Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "6.02.040 Animals That Habitually Make Noise. A. In residential zones of the City, it shall be unlawful for any person(s) owning or having control of one or more animals (`Responsible Person'), either willfully or through failure to exercise proper control, to allow such animal to habitually or continually bark, howl, crow, or make any other loud noise in such a manner as to at any time, day or night, cause general annoyance or discomfort to a neighboring inhabitant. The standard of general annoyance or discomfort is a 'reasonable person' standard, i.e., the noise is such that a reasonable person, under the same or similar circumstances, would suffer more than minor annoyance or discomfort. B. Evidence of a violation may be based upon complaints from neighboring inhabitant(s), hereby defined as persons living within two hundred (200) yards of such Responsible Person's premises, or if said animal wanders outside of said premises, within two hundred (200) yards of the animal's current location. If there is more than one neighboring inhabitant, as defined above, evidence of a violation requires complaints from at least two (2) P178 neighboring inhabitants living in separate residences. The Senior Animal Services Officer or his/her duly authorized agent or representative may waive the two-complainant requirement and accept a single complaint, if he/she determines geographic or other circumstances exist whereby a noise disturbance caused by the animal(s) can only affect only one residence. If the complainant(s) lives in excess of two hundred (200) yards from such Responsible Person's premises, the Senior Animal Services Officer or his/her duly authorized agent or representative may waive the two hundred (200) yard requirement if he or she determines that there is credible evidence that the complainant(s) is experiencing a level of noise comparable to a person residing within two hundred (200) yards of the noise, which evidence may include, but is not limited to, tape recordings, videotapes, sound monitoring logs, photographs, maps, or declarations of other persons living a similar distance away from the noise. C. The Animal Care and Services Department will substantially follow the procedures below in responding to all complaints of noisy animals, however, the procedures and timelines set forth herein are discretionary and not mandatory. Should a particular stage in the process take longer than the period set forth, or should exceptional circumstances require any of the periods be shortened, the process may proceed to the next step without the necessity of repeating any prior step. 1. Upon receiving an initial complaint from any person, either orally or in writing, the Responsible Person of the subject animal will be sent a letter. The letter will notify the Responsible Person that the Animal Care and Services Department has received a complaint or complaints, provide information on ways to resolve the complaint(s), and instructions to abate the problem within ten (10) days. 2. Upon receiving a second complaint from any person, either orally or in writing, a minimum of 10 days after the initial letter has been issued, the complainant(s) will be sent Nuisance Animal Noise Complaint Forms, with instructions that, if the nuisance is not abated, to complete the form and have at least one neighboring inhabitant in a separate household complete the second form. The complainant(s) must complete and sign the forms under penalty of perjury, and return them to Animal Care and Services. The letter shall also contain a Waiver Application to apply for a waiver from either the two-complainant or two hundred (200) yard requirements. Upon receipt of two such complaints, or waiver from the Senior Animal Services Officer or his/her representative, the Animal Care and Services Department shall assign an officer to investigate the complaint(s). If the investigating officer determines that there is probable cause to believe a violation of this Section 6.02.040 has occurred or is occurring, the Responsible Person of the subject animal will be sent an Abatement Letter. The letter will notify the Responsible Person that the Animal Care and Services Department has received a complaint or complaints, regarding the subject animal(s), describing the substance of the complaint. The letter will also explain the process and potential costs/consequences for all parties if the matter proceeds and results in the issuance of a citation, and will encourage the parties to attempt to resolve the complaint themselves. If that is unsuccessful, the letter will further recommend that the parties seek mediation services and will provide information on available free and low cost medication services. The letter shall be served by personal service, mail, posting, or publication according to the procedure listed in Section 1.12.080 of this code (Procedure for serving administrative citation, compliance order and notice). If, at the end of a 10-day period after the Abatement Letter is served, the complainant(s) advise(s) the Animal P179 Care and Services Department that the noise has not abated, the Responsible Person may be issued an administrative citation as provided in Chapter 1.12 of this code. Administrative fines will be in the amounts adopted in Section 6.02.010 of this code. The administrative citation content, procedures, administrative hearing process, and related remedies and general provisions contained in Chapter 1.12 of this code shall be followed." SECTION 4: A new Chapter 6.04 is hereby added to Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 6.04 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS Sections: 6.04.010 Purpose. 6.04.020 Exceptions to Chapter. 6.04.030 Determinations and Notice Process. 6.04.040 Authority to Seize Animal Posing Immediate Threat to Public Safety. 6.04.050 Handling of Potentially Dangerous or Vicious Animals. 6.04.060 Removal of Designation as Potentially Dangerous or Vicious. 6.04.070 Conditions for Destroying Animal Found Vicious or Potentially Dangerous. 6.04.080 Conditions for Prohibiting Ownership of Vicious Animals. 6.04.090 Criminal Penalties/Civil Remedies. 6.04.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide regulations and procedures related to the declaration, conditions for release and control, and the disposition and destruction of potentially dangerous and vicious animals. A. Potentially Dangerous Animal Defined. 'Potentially dangerous animal' means any of the following: 1. Any animal which, when unprovoked, on two separate occasions within the prior 36- month period, engages in any behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and the animal are off the property of the owner or keeper of the animal. 2. Any animal which, when unprovoked, bites a person causing a less severe injury than as defined in Section 6.04.010 (C). 3. Any animal which, when unprovoked, on two separate occasions within the prior 36- month period, has killed, seriously bitten, inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury attacking a domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the animal. B. Vicious Animal Defined. 'Vicious animal' means any of the following: 1. Any animal seized under Section 599aa of the Penal Code and upon the sustaining of a conviction of the owner or keeper under subdivision (a) of Section 597.5 of the Penal Code. P180 2. Any animal which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner, inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being. 3. Any animal previously determined to be and currently listed as a potentially dangerous animal which, after its owner or keeper has been notified of this determination, continues the behavior described in Section 6.04.010 (A) or is maintained in violation of Section 6.04.050. C. Severe Injury Defined. 'Severe injury' means any physical injury to a human being that results in muscle tears or disfiguring lacerations or requires multiple sutures or corrective or cosmetic surgery. 6.04.020 Exceptions to Chapter. A. This chapter does not apply to licensed kennels, humane society shelters, Field Services facilities or veterinary clinics. B. This chapter shall not apply to any dog utilized by any fire department, fire district, police department or any fire or law enforcement officer in the performance of public safety work. 6.04.030 Determinations and Notice Process. A. Determination of Potentially Dangerous or Vicious Animal. If an Animal Services Officer, after conducting an investigation, has determined that there exists probable cause to believe that an animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, he/she shall report the results of his/her investigation in writing to the Senior Animal Services Officer or designee who shall review said written report for the purpose of determining whether or not the animal in question is potentially dangerous or vicious. B. Complaints and Evidence. If the written report submitted by the Animal Services Officer is based on a complaint or complaints received from a member of the public, the Animal Services Officer shall require the complainant to put the complaint in writing and sign it under penalty of perjury, so that it may be offered as evidence at subsequent hearing(s). The Animal Services Officer may also include in said report to the Senior Animal Services Officer: 1. if known, the animal's previous history of biting, attacking, or causing injury to a human being or animal; 2. the nature and extent of injuries inflicted and the behavior of victims involved; 3. the place where the bite, attack or injury occurred; 4. the presence or absence of any provocation for the bite, attack or injury; 5. the extent to which property has been damaged or destroyed; 6. the extent to which the animal exhibits characteristics of aggressive or unpredictable temperament or behavior in the presence of human beings or domestic animals; and P181 7. the extent to which the animal exhibits any characteristics of being trained for fighting or attack and any evidence tending to show such training. C. Exceptions. 1. An animal may be found not potentially dangerous or vicious if the Senior Field Services Officer, Hearing Officer, or any duly authorized person reasonably determines any of the following: a. any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time the injury or damage was sustained, was committing a willful trespass upon the premises occupied by the owner or keeper of the animal or was committing or attempting to commit a crime upon the premises; b. the person who sustained the injury or damage was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the animal at the time; c. the animal was protecting or defending a person within the immediate vicinity of the animal from an attack, assault, battery, crime or attempt to commit an attack, assault, battery or crime by the person who sustained the injury; or d. any injury or damage was sustained by a domestic animal, which, at the time the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the animal. 2. No dog may be declared potentially dangerous or vicious if the injury or damage to a domestic animal was sustained while the dog was working as a hunting, herding, or a predator control dog and it was on the property of, or under the control of, its owner or keeper and the damage or injury was to a species or type of domestic animal appropriate to the work of the dog. D. Notice of Determination and Administrative Hearing. 1. If a determination is made by the Senior Animal Services Officer or designee that the animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, the owner or keeper ('Responsible Person') shall comply with Section 6.04.050 in accordance with a time schedule established by the Senior Animal Services Officer or designee but in no case more than thirty (30) days after the date of mailing of the Notice of Determination. 2. If the Responsible Person contests the determination, he/she may request an administrative hearing of the decision of the Senior Animal Services Officer or designee by completing and submitting a Request for Hearing form in accordance with Chapter 1.12.110 of this code. 3. Upon receipt of a request for review, an administrative hearing to review the case shall be held, in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of this code. If the Hearing Officer determines that an animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, the Hearing Officer may establish a time schedule to ensure compliance with this Chapter, but in no case more than thirty (30) days subsequent to the date of the mailing of the Hearing Officer's findings and orders. P182 6.04.040 Authority to Seize Animal Posing Immediate Threat to Public Safety. If an Animal Services Officer or a Contracted San Bernardino County Sheriff's Deputy (RCPD) , has investigated and determined there exists probable cause to believe an animal poses an immediate and serious threat to the safety of the public, then the Animal Services Officer may seize and impound the animal pending the hearing to be held pursuant to Section 6.04.030 (D) of this code. If confinement is not contrary to public safety, the Animal Services Officer may require the animal to be confined at the Responsible Person's expense in a kennel or veterinary facility approved by the Animal Care and Services Department or at the home of the Responsible Person. 6.04.050 Handling of Potentially Dangerous or Vicious Animals. A. Animal to Be Kept Under Control at All Times. 1. Control While on Responsible Person's Premises. A potentially dangerous or vicious animal, while on the Responsible Person's property, shall at all times be kept indoors or in an enclosure which shall secure the yard so that the animal cannot escape and children cannot trespass. The enclosure shall be approved by the Animal Care and Services Department and meet the following criteria: a. the enclosure shall be constructed to prevent the going in of the public or other animals and the entrance to the enclosure shall be locked at all times while the animal is contained within the enclosure; b. the enclosure shall be well ventilated and shall be six (6) sided, consisting of four (4) walls, a cover or roof and a permanent floor to prevent the animal from escaping by either climbing or digging under the wall. If the bottom is not secured to the sides, the sides must be embedded in the ground no less than two (2) feet; c. the animal shall be housed pursuant to the provisions of section 597t of the California Penal Code (adequate enclosed area). The minimum dimensions of the enclosure shall measure five (5) feet by ten (10) feet and be of a height which does not restrict the animal's natural movements and which allows the owner or keeper into the enclosure to maintain the animal; d. the enclosure shall be surrounded by a perimeter fence which prevents the entry of the public onto the property of the owner or keeper but which shall not serve in any part as a primary enclosure for the animal. 2. Compliance Inspections. As a condition of maintaining a potentially dangerous or vicious animal, its owner or keeper shall allow access to the Animal Care and Services Department to inspect the premises to ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. daily. Prior notification of the inspection to the owner or keeper of the potentially dangerous or vicious animal shall not be required. 3. Control When off Owner's or Keeper's Premises. At all times, when a potentially dangerous or vicious animal is not on the premises of the Responsible Person, the animal shall be securely muzzled and restrained by a leash. The animal shall also be under the control of a person eighteen (18) years of age or older, who is physically capable of restraining the animal. P183 B. Warning Notice. The Responsible Person of the animal shall display, in a prominent place upon the premises where the animal is kept or maintained, a sign easily readable by the public using the words "DANGEROUS ANIMAL", or "VICIOUS ANIMAL", as ordered by the Senior Animal Services Officer, Hearing Officer, or any duly authorized person after a hearing or hearings pursuant to Section 6.04.030, in letters at least two (2) inches in height. C. Permanent Identification of Animal. The owner or keeper of the animal shall provide a permanent identification by means of an implanted microchip that shall be registered with the Animal Care and Services Department. A photograph of the animal shall be kept on record for identification, in addition to registration as a Dangerous Animal or Vicious Animal. D. Notice of Change of Location or Death of Animal 1. If an animal determined to be potentially dangerous or vicious dies, is sold, transferred or permanently removed from the City, the owner or keeper shall notify the Senior Animal Services Officer of the changed condition(s) and new location of the animal in writing within two (2) working days of the changed status. 2. Animals determined to be potentially dangerous or vicious may be relocated to other premises within the City only upon written notification to the Senior Animal Services Officer a minimum of five (5) working days in advance of the animal being physically transferred to new premises. Such physical transfer requires the inspection and approval by an Animal Services Officer of the new premises' enclosure and perimeter fencing for compliance with Section 6.04.050. E. Licensing and Vaccination. All potentially dangerous and vicious dogs shall be licensed and vaccinated in accordance with Chapter 6.02 of this code. The potentially dangerous or vicious dog designation shall be included in the license records of the dog. A potentially dangerous or vicious dog fee shall be charged in addition to the regular licensing fee to provide for the increased costs of maintaining the records of the dog pursuant to the City Schedule of Fees. F. Designated Potentially Dangerous and Vicious Animal Listing. All animals designated potentially dangerous or vicious shall be recorded on a listing maintained by the Animal Care and Services Department. Animals designated potentially dangerous or vicious shall remain on the listing until the animal dies, is permanently removed from the City, or is removed from designation pursuant to section 6.04.060. 6.04.060 Removal of Designation as Potentially Dangerous or Vicious. If the Responsible Person demonstrates changes that mitigate the risk to public safety to the satisfaction of the Senior Animal Services Officer or designee, the designation of potentially dangerous or vicious may be removed. 6.04.070 Conditions for Destroying Animal Found Vicious or Potentially Dangerous. A. An animal determined to be a vicious or potentially dangerous animal may be destroyed by the Animal Care and Services Department when it is found, after proceedings conducted under Section 6.04.030, that the presence of the animal in the community would create a significant threat to the public health, safety and welfare. If it is determined that a P184 vicious or potentially dangerous animal may be maintained in the community, the Senior Animal Services Officer, Hearing Officer, or other duly authorized person shall impose conditions upon the ownership of the animal, including, but not limited to, the conditions set forth in section 6.04.050 in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. B. An animal previously determined to be a vicious or potentially dangerous animal may be destroyed by the Animal Care and Services Department when it is found, after proceedings conducted under Section 6.04.030, that the owner or keeper of the animal has failed to comply with the provisions of Section 6.04.050(A). 6.04.080 Conditions for Prohibiting Ownership of Vicious Animals. The Responsible Person of an animal determined to be vicious or potentially dangerous may be prohibited by the Senior Animal Services Officer, Hearing Officer, or other duly authorized person from owning, possessing, controlling or having custody of any other animals having dangerous propensities for a period of up to three (3) years, when it is found, after proceedings conducted under Section 6.04.030, that ownership or possession of such an animal by that person would create a significant threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, as determined by the Senior Animal Services Officer, Hearing Officer, or other duly authorized person. 6.04.090 Criminal Penalties/Civil Remedies. The criminal penalties for violation of this Chapter shall be the same as provided in subsections 'a' through 'd' of Section 6.02.010.6.1, Penalties. The violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances." SECTION 5: Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance, chapters or sections adopted herein be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance, chapters and sections hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. STAFF REPORT CITP MANAGER'S OFFICE P185 RANCHO Date: October 17, 2007 cUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Fabian A. Villenas, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR AN AUTOMATED PHOTO RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM WITH REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEM INC. AT SELECTED INTERSECTIONS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $286,560 PER YEAR FUNDED BY ACCT. NO. 1001001-5314 FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2) YEARS, WITH TWO (2), ONE (1) YEAR RENEWAL OPTIONS AT CITY'S DISCRETION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing per California Vehicle Code 21455.6(a) and consider approval of an agreement with Redflex Traffic System Inc. for the provision of an automated red light camera enforcement system at selected intersections, in an amount of $286,560 per year funded by Account No. 1001001-5314 for a period of two years, with two (2), one (1) year renewal options at City's discretion. BACKGROUND In 2001, the City initiated a red light camera enforcement pilot program with Nestor Traffic Systems to provide and install red light camera systems at the intersections of Carnelian Avenue/Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard/Haven Avenue. The cameras covered all four approaches (east, west, north, and south) for both intersections. The goals of the pilot program were to reduce traffic collisions at these intersections and increase traffic safety by discouraging the "running" of red lights. The Carnelian/Base Line intersection's red light camera system became operational in June 2002 and the Haven/Foothill intersection in November 2003. The City paid Nestor $4,230 per month per approach and recouped a portion of its cost from revenue received for citations issued. The contract with Nestor expired in December 2006 and a temporary extension was approved by the City Council at its December 6, 2006 meeting to continue the program at three of the more active approaches at the Base Line/Carnelian intersection (northbound, southbound, and westbound). The temporary extension allowed staff to conduct a thorough selection process and evaluate the changes in the market in regards to more cost effective programs being offered and the technology improving. Research by the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) indicates there are more than 1.8 million intersection crashes annually and according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, red light running is the leading cause of traffic collisions. A comprehensive 2005 study by the U.S. Department of Transportation concluded that automated red light camera systems are effective in reducing crashes. A staff analysis of the pilot program in Rancho Cucamonga shows that there has been a positive safety effect at the two intersections that utilize this technology. P186 APPROVnL Or ~ CONTRACT FOR AN AUTO1vIATED PHOTO RED LIGHT CAMERA PAGr: 2 ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM WITH REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEM INC. A1' SELECTED INTERSECTIONS, IN'I'I~IE ADIOUNT OE X286,560 PER YEAR FUNDED BY Acc'r. NO. 1001001-7314 POR A PEI210D OP T\Y/O (2) 1Tr1RS, UTTI-I 7W0 (2), O OCTONER 17, 2007 VENDOR SELECTION The Purchasing Division issued a Request for Proposals on February 22, 2007 for the provision of an automated red light camera enforcement system. A selection committee with representatives from Police, Traffic Engineering, IS, Purchasing and City Manager's Office was formed in order to evaluate the proposals received. Two proposals were received; one from current vendor Nestor Traffic Systems, and one from Redflex Traffic System, Inc. Both respondents were invited for an interview. Proposals were evaluated on criteria such as cost, scope of work, past performance, financials, responsiveness, and references. Through the competitive process, Redflex was identified as being the most responsive, responsible vendor. Based on the set criteria, the company's ability to deliver the best overall program, strong market position and the ability to enhance public safety through advanced technology, the City negotiated a final contract to provide commitments for the program operation through the year 2012. REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEM Over the past several years, Redflex has emerged as a leading provider for automated red light camera enforcement systems, particularly in California. Redflex services over 70% of the entire California market, with 50 contracts with California jurisdictions. The California Vehicle Code outlines strict legal and operational specifications and statutory requirements. For this reason, it was very important that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consider a vendor that has a history of demonstrated experience in dealing with California laws regarding photo-enforced intersections. Nationwide, Redflex has instituted over 100 systems. Redflex has an exceptionally strong contract renewal rate, which is a solid indication of customer satisfaction. All programs offered by the vendor are "turnkey' programs. The vendor provides all hardware, software, and back office/citation processing and support services to the City to make the program fully operational. There is no City staff required to install or maintain equipment. Redflex utilizes a "main" camera to capture a set of high resolution digital images of the violation event clearly showing the scene including the red light signal and a clear view of the vehicle as well as a close-up of the vehicle license plate. A second "face camera" will be used to capture an image of the driver. Additionally, the system captures a 12-second digital video of the violation, providing additional evidence for the Rancho Cucamonga deputy to review. Photo enforcement systems which combine digital still cameras and digital video cameras provide the best enforcement programs by increasing a jurisdiction's total citation yield rate and reducing the number of red light violations contested. Additionally, Redflex offers the only system that includes an encrypted databar, which "stamps' pertinent violation information of the image at the very point of capture. The information that is encrypted at the point of capture on each image cannot be manipulated by Redflex or the system. Of particular interest to staff was that a system installation at an intersection be as non-intrusive as possible. Vendors were required to submit photos of a typical installation. The Redflex system offers an aesthetically pleasing installation that minimally clutters the intersection. P187 Arraovnl. OF A CONTRACT FOR AN AUTOMATED PHOTO RED LIGHT CAMERA PAGE 3 ENFOIiCF_MENT SYSTEM WITH REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEM INC. A'I' SEIJ3CTED INTERSHCCIONS, IN'1'HL" AMOUNT OP $286,760 PER 1BAR FUNDED HY ACCT. NO. 1001001-3314 F012 A PERIOD OF 1'VJO (z) PEARS, \Y7TH'I1X~0 (2), O OCTOHER 17, 2007 RED LIGHT CAMERA LOCATIONS By analyzing traffic collision history for the City's intersections, Staff identified Rancho Cucamonga intersections with a high traffic collision propensity and, during contract negotiations, asked Redflex to conduct video surveys of these intersection approaches that counts the number of violations that occur. Based on the survey results presented by Redflex, staff recommends the following approaches for installation: • Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue -southbound • Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -southbound • Milliken Avenue and Church Street -southbound A fourth location is currently being evaluated. These recommendations are for individual intersection approaches only, with each intersection having a maximum of four approaches (east, west, north, and south). Atypical installation at an intersection approach (for example southbound Milliken Avenue at Church Street) covers left turn, straight-through, and right turn lanes. The Redflex system is modular in nature and additional locations can be easily added in the future if desired. FINANCIAL IMPACT Redflex charges a fixed fee of $5,970 per month for each designated intersection approach. The agreement with Redflex includes a "cost neutrality' guarantee. Redflex contractually guarantees the program to remain cost neutral for the lifetime of the contract. This is determined by a monthly reconciliation of the revenue from the citations and the monthly program fees. Should citation revenue fall short of the cost of the fees, Redflex will absorb and carryover the difference in cost. The City incurs no-up-front costs associated with the installation of the photo enforcement equipment. The Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget includes $410,000 in Account No. 1001001-5314 for the Automated Red Light Enforcement program, based on current costs with the existing vendor. For four designated intersection approaches, the annual cost would be $286,560. No additional funding is necessary. The Police Department will continue using deputies from the Traffic Division to review, approve, or reject citations issued by the photo enforcement system, as well as to provide court testimony on contested citations. OPTIONS Two options are available to the City Council. The City Council may wish to: • Conduct the public hearing and receive public testimony as required by CVC 21455.6(a) and approve the agreement with Redflex Traffic System Inc. to provide automated red light camera enforcement program at locations designated by the City. • Reject the proposal submitted by Redflex and terminate the City's automated red light enforcement pilot program. P188 APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR AN AUTOMATED PHOTO RED LIGHT CAMERA PAGE 4 ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM WITH REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEM INC. AT sELECrED INTERSECTIONS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $256,560 PER YEAR FUNDED BY ACCT'. NO. 1001001-5314 F012 e1 PBRIOD OF'rW0 (2) YEARS, WITH TWO (2~, O OCTOBER 17, 2007 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~.-~T~----, Fabian A. Villenas Management Analyst III City Manager's Office ~. a~ E U wo .., a~ ~. to 0 ~. a C~ i•~ ~° W C~7 xz U~ z~ d `./ ~~ ~ ~ ~! r..~ ~ C •' ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~, ~ ~ ~ y W ~ e~ ~ a~ a E ~ ~ U ~ ~ ^" ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ o ~i ,~b4 N ~ ~ ~ • •~ • ~.I 4~ C~ 0 a~ c~ O '~ M~ N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? O ~ w '"~ ~ o~ ~ ,o ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ w ~ °o U ~, I ,~ r.., C a> a~ v W v e~ U aA .~ a~ a •• ~1 C~ O O . ~., 4~ '~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ O ~~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ ~ h n •~ a, o ~ V ~ •~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ • ~ ~..~ •~ O ~ V ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V C~ '"~ ~'" ~ ~ i i aA .~~" w . O I ~ o N C~ ~„ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ C ~ .~ L ~ .~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~' O C~ Z U '~ ~' ~3 .~ v ~ ~ ~i p~i0 c~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ H ~ • V ~ ~ y ~O ~ ~ V ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~° ~ ,~ o a~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ ~ ~ ~ .o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ as ~ ~ o ~_° E~ ~ ~ ^ r~ I ~_ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ..I ~ ~ ~ ~.y • ~ ~M • ~1 V ~ V ~ ~~ ~ •~ +~ 4~ ~ ~ . ~ v ~ ~ ~' •~ 4~ I--i ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ . C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ c~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N a ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~, ~ o ~ ~ .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~'" 0 • c V ~ ~+ 1 A ~ ~ ~i ~ .~ y i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~I ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ r 1/~ ~ ~/ 1 .F., ~ ~i ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ r••~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c W ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ .~ o ~ O ~ "Z' '~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ A ~ ~, c ~ ''"' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~' ~ ~ ago ~--~ ~ '~ • ~ ~ °' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ V 4~ ~ V V V1 ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~+ 4 -i 0 ~ • I~ W V` v1 r.., v w w ~i bA .^., "~ 4~ . ~., O 0 ~° a~ a~ a O •~ 4~ •,~ 0 .o °~ d •~ b,A .~ .~ b~ W C~ ~. . ~., 0 ^C w a~ v a~ c~ .~ c~ 0 0 •~y 0 0 4~ e~ N a~ a~ x 0 a~ 0 a ~~ r.., C a~ a~ v C W L G~ C~ V r..~ .L bA .~ "~ w v1~' v `~ h 4i e .~ .~ C~ 4~ 0 O O V •,~ ^C • .O V •,..y .~ .~ .~ •,~ V O V O b~A O O •,~ V . ~., 4~ r..~ .~ C~ . ~.., ." ~' 4~ H • 0 .~ .~ •,~ C~ 4~ .~ 4~ 4~ .~ ~" O O O .,-, .~~" c~ 4~ 4.i C~ ~O • C~ C~ 4~ 4~ V C~ 0 V O C~ ~O V W • ~O V .~ 4~ V .~ .~ .~ .~ 1 ^I ~~M ~~ V1 r.., C a~ a~ v W V b.A .^., '~ x ~~ v `~ h 4~ O 4~ 4~ .., t~ bA O 4~ O a~ a~ V •,~ 4~ O '~ C~ 4~ C~ O a~ t~ •,~ O .~~" •~, s O •,~ O r~ 4~ .~ ~" . ~., 0 r..~ 4~ . `~~"" a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v t' o G~ +' i~ G~ G~ V L ~ V .~ w ~ ~ ~ ,~, e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i1 .~ a ~ ~ a~ h +-~ ~ ~ ~ ~i • •~ ~ V ~ O 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O ~ -i••i ~ •~ ~O ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~-'+ V O ~ ~ V ~ ~ ""~ ~ '-' O ~ v •,~ 4~ ~~ ~ 4~ • ~~•, '~ 4~ O • ~I • ~I r~ N r--I i~ r..~ C~ V ~ ~ 4~ ~ "~ O ~ •~ ~ ~ C~ "~' ~ r••~ .~ O •~ O ~ ~ ~~ • - ` ,~., ~ rr r~. 5~`.~ 1' 1 I S ~: } :f ~. . ~; ,. ~~_ - ~ / i' .~ 1 { ~y V •~ ~ ~ C*y V1 ~ 0 '~ ~'"~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 O .~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ .~ C~ ~ ~ ~, U ~ ~ a, G ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~' a~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ .o .~ ~..I~ ~I • ~••I '~ ~..i ~ •~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-' ~ v ~ ~' ~ ~ o ~~ .~ a~ ~ ~~ ~ .o a~ ~ ~ '-' a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ v O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ o ~ a :o ~w~ ~ ~~~U ~ ~ .N C -v~c~ ~raoo U `' ~ ~ i U ~ -D ~O C ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ • • • ! M7 ,~ . ~ I`r ~_ ~C fd ~ L ~ Q~ (n ~ (~ ~.+ ~ ~ ~ U ~ o ~ N 1~ .~ O ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~i U~? CU • • • iaR ', l i ~ I , i I 7 } ` " ~~ :`~ 1 :~' ._ ,~ S~, R I~ {S' ~_h ~~ Q t V Y b ~. V Q m W Q • ~ 4~ ~ v ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 4~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ '~ v ~ ~ •,~ C~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O e~ ~ ~ ~ ''~ ~ ,~ c W ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ o •~ c O . ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ° °~ o~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~., '~ o ~ '~ ~ a, .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ v~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ r••~ ~ ~ ''O O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ r••~ ~ w w O ~0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ O •~ ~T~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ w c ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ •b,~p ~ ~ O O ~ O ~, ~ ci.., ~,,, O O ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I .O 4~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ . ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ 4~ ~ ,LV~ O O `~"'' ~ ,~ .. ~ ~ ~ W O ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~' ~ 4~ ~ ~"' CAA C~ O n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ r..i ~""' r..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ .,~ ~ 4..~ C~! ~ ~ ~ ~" O .~ ~ w c~ " ~. .~I 1~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aA O ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ O ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ V 4~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ v •~"' ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o °' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ v U I ,~ ~/1 C a~ ~ Cam. v L ~ N ~~ ~ 0 w • 1~i 'IV C~ ~1 i.~ C~ V bA .^., "~ G~ x First, thank you for allowing the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga the opportunity to gain insight to how public safety is being presently delivered by OUR Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. We take special notice, and emphasis, when we use the word "our'; for truly this is "our" city, this is "our" city council, this "our" city staff and this is "our" bre department that we employ, and/or have elected, for "our" benefit -and not, as a select few seem to think, the other way around. Tonight, CHECK is presenting details of this citizens group's dedicated and selfless work regarding what constitutes a proper allocation of public safety resources. It is important to understand that the information that has been presented since June, along with research that will be presented tonight and in the future, is NOT an individual effort. Rather, it is the effort of many people who have been trying to understand, consciously or unconsciously, a public safety system that truly they have questioned for many years. Well, tonight The CHECK organization, representing many citizens and business owners of this city, and beyond, will be presenting information that will now see the light of day. Again we state, which has been repeated by me personally for three years now, none of this has anything to do with the fine individuals that have chosen to serve this community, in public service, within our fire department. But rather, tonight's presentation has only one objective, and that is: "Defining The Appropriate Allocation Of Public Safety Resources" Tonight's presentation will be delivered by Louie Gustis, Victor Garcia and myself -Gary Lacy, all of whom are citizens of this wonderful community of Rancho Cucamonga, and represent just of few of those individuals who have extensively examined the facts surrounding the delivery of our public safety system within this community, and throughout the state of California. Thank you. Gary W. Lacy Executive Director "DEFINING THE APPROPRIATE ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESOURCES" by CHECK, Inc. "Citizens Helping Empower Citizens Through Knowledge" Presented to: Donald J. Kurth, l-9ayor The citizens, the city council and personnel of the city of Rancho Cucamonga October 17, 2007 An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire antl Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 1 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK First, thank you for allowing the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga the opportunity to gain insight to how public safety is being presently delivered by OUR Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. We take special notice, and emphasis, when we use the word "our'; for truly this is "our" city, this is "our" city council, this "our" city staff and this is "our" fire department that we employ, and/or have elected, for "our" benefit -and not, as a select few seem to think, the other way around. Tonight, CHECK is presenting details of this citizens group's dedicated and selfless work regarding what constitutes a proper allocation of public safety resources. It is important to understand that the information that has been presented since June, along with research that will be presented tonight and in the future, is NOT an individual effort. Rather, it is the effort of many people who have been trying to understand, consciously or unconsciously, a public safety system that truly they have questioned for many years. Well, tonight The CHECK organization, representing many citizens and business owners of this city, and beyond, will be presenting information that will now see the light of day. Again we state, which has been repeated by me personally for three years now, none of this has anything to do with the fine individuals that have chosen to serve this community, in public service, within our fire department. But rather, tonight's presentation has only one objective, and that is: "Defining The Appropriate Allocation Of Pub/ic Safety Resources" Tonight's presentation will be delivered by Louie Gustis, Victor Garcia and myself - Gary Lacy, all of whom are citizens of this wonderful community of Rancho Cucamonga, and represent just of few of those individuals who have extensively examined the facts surrounding the delivery of our public safety system within this community, and throughout the state of California. Thank you. Gary W. Lacy Executive Director An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Page 2 of 20 October 17, 2007 - CN£CK A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA On tune 20, 2007 THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WAS PRESENTED TO THE CITIZENS, THE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON; "THE APPROPRIATE ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESOURCES" We, as a group of concerned citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, have extensively examined the facts concerning our fire department and its relationship to the delivery of public safety services in our city. This research was facilitated by "CHECK". "Citizens Helping Empower Citizens through Knowledge" w~vvw, checkoo vernmentvvaste. oro CHECK was born out of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Citizens that proved that an educated public is one that will be engaged to dispel the long held belief, "That you can't change the system". CHECK is a community grassroots non-profit 501(c)(3) public benefit corporation that is committed to ensuring excellence in public service and public safety. CHECK's emphasis is on education that is based upon thorough research, unbiased evaluation, complete disclosure, and engaging the public, and government, through CHECK's educational process. CHECK'S belief is an educated and informed public will lead the elected to safeguard the people's tax dollars in a cost effective manner, and at the same time improve overall public safety and public service. CHECK'S goal is to see that all tax dollars are exposed to an educated comprehensive review, with special emphasis on public safety -centering on all our public servants being accountable to "We the people...", and the resources we entrust to them for our benefit. CHECK'S beneficiaries will not only be the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga and their families, but all cities and their taxpaying citizens throughout the state of California, An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided 6y The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 3 of 20 October 17, 2047 -CHECK and beyond. CHECK is committed to ensuring that all of our cities' assets and resources are used to the optimal benefits of all of the people. The "Executive Summary" and the Common Sense findings we presented on June 20th, used factual data supplied by the city of Rancho Cucamonga and other reliable sources. IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WE STATED SOME RATHER PROFOUND THINGS... ...the system our firefighters work within is broken and is one that has evolved without any meaningful pub/ic oversight or review. The "Executive Summary" found and reported the fo/%wing: • Rancho Cucamonga must put an immediate freeze on increasing the "size and scone" of our present fire department system. • The fire department system, under the present mode/ and due to its a/location of personnel and their /invited numbers, requires massive amounts of overtime, which has boosted our typical firefighter's base sa/pries of $70,000.00 per year, to incomes in excess of $126,000.00 per year. These six figure incomes, with the addition of benefits received, resu/t in an average cost per fire and emergency rescue personnel of $166,000.00 per year to our city and citizens. • These figures represent personnel costs on/v. typical/y for working 10 to 14 days per month (24-hour shifts), They do not include any of the cost to the taxpayers for fire stations, fire vehicles, training and equipment. Bottom line, this city must embrace enhancing our present public safety delivery system through the research we and others have accomplished - an enhancement that will result in a commonsense approach to public safety, and one that wi//// arovide a better public saferi system by: • Doubling the size of our first responders so our community wi/I be better equipped to hand/e a major event, like the "Big One', or another major disaster, natural or man-made, like a terrorist attack. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 4 of 20 October 17, 20D7 -CHECK • The city wi// save mi//ions of dollars per year, while doubling our first responders, through our recommended reallocation of resources. This process will a/so address some fire department personnel concerns regarding the safety issues and time away from fami/y that are caused by the 24-hour shift. All of this will be achieved when this council directs staff to develop a Request For Proposal (RFP) that incorporates our findings and recommendations. Commonsense must prevail from this day forward. Commonsense that will provide better public safety, more efficiently, double the size of our first responders, and at the same time, save money for the taxpayers. Rancho Cucamonga must create a bidding orocess. A bidding process (RFP) that would be specific to the type of fire and emergency rescue service that would be required from this point forward - a bidding process (RFP) that will be open to all that can meet the specifications of the city's requirements. The bidding process (RFP) must be open to our present fire district, the county and any other legitimate pub/ic or private entity, We strongly believe that an open bidding process (RFP) wi// revea/, and/or, encourage other savings and efficiencies -amazing things happen when the industry of people is put to a competitive process. And tonight, we present the detai/s to the "Executive Summary': An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamoroa Fire District. Page 5 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK "DEFINING THE APPROPRIATE ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESOURCES" COMPLETE SYNOPSIS OF OUR FINDINGS: Public safety has five main comvonents: 1. Police. 2. Fire and emergency rescue. 3. Emergency medical response. 4. City controlled call center. 5. An aware, involved, and trained public. Actual ca//s received by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department that relate to fire and/or emergency rescue account for on/y 3% of the total. 97% of the calls are for medical emergency response. Good will calls -liking fixing f/at tires, and opening car doors where someone has locked their keys in their cars might be a nice gesture, but are not the responsibility of our fire and emergency rescue service, especially at current labor and equipment costs. These courtesy calls also reduce the ability of our fire and emergency rescue personnel to respond to calls that are actually the job they have been trained to do and are best equipped to deal with. Sending engine companies (large trucks) to respond to the typical medical emergency call is not efficient and does NOT serve the community's best interests. A vast majority of these calls (appears to be over 92% of the 97%), can be handled more efficiently, by an AMR or another private-type system; and typically with no added cost to the Rancho Cucamonga taxpayers. Ambulances can be strategically placed within the community, which our present system refuses to do. Strategically placed equipment will enable people to receive the best possible care, when needed, by a trained medical staff in a hospital. Systems that use two-person (paramedic/EMT) ambu/ante transport equipment can handle medical calls more efficiently, and are specifically designed to An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 6 of 20 October 17, 20D7 -CHECK transport victims to a hospital's emergency rooms -where the patient is best served. Note: Why are fire engine trucks crews currently being placed out of service by somehow winding up at hospitals? All evidence shows the best treatment can only be achieved by getting a patient to a hospital emergency room, where doctors can hand/e the situations much better. The same evidence shows that the move in California to make fire departments primary responders in such medical calls is not conducive to efficient public safety. Rather, it is detrimental to public safety and response times. BY WAY OF EXAMPLE: A 911 call comes in for medical assistance and an ambulance. 1. Typically the ambulance and the engine crews arrive at the same time. This alone is suspect, and goes far to support how broken the system truly is. 2. The family clearly saw the need for an ambulance so their loved one could be transported to the hospital. 3. But, not only does the ambulance arrive, but a whole host of fire engine equipment and personnel that get in the way and can make the homeowner even more anxious in the situation. 4. When all that was really needed, was swell-trained and suitably equipped paramedic quick-response patient transport vehicle that gets the patient onto a gurney, into the ambulance and off to the hospital where the best care possible will be received. NOT ONLY IS THIS COMMONSENSE, BUT IT HAS PROVEN TO BE THE BEST WAY TO HANDLE THIS ASPECT OF PUBLIC SAFETY An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided 6y The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 7 of 20 Qctober 17, 2007 - CHECX City-Controlled Call Center A properly controlled call center is not a new idea, especially when public safety resources are to be properly allocated - as recently reported in The Press Enterprise. ... dispatchers at the San Bernardino Fire Department also are ab/e to decide whether to deploy a fire engine, paramedic and an ambulance to a medica/- aid ca// or to send just an emergency medica/ technician and an ambulance. NI/hile Simi/ar programs are in use throughout the world, San Bernardino is the only inland emergency services agency using a system that allows dispatchers to determine what level of medical service a caller is going to need. "Maybe we don't need a paramedic engine, squad vehicle and ambulance, but certainly sending one of those with a paramedic on board is as far as we would be willing to go -- at least right now." (Quote by Brace Barton, director of the Riverside County Emergency Medical Services Agency.) "In emergency medical situations, you want to adapt the response to the emergency. Nile need to get away from the one-size-fits-all response," (Quote by, Dr. Daved van Stralen, a pediatrician at Loma Linda University Medical Center and medical director for American Medical Response) City-Controlled Call Center Will Address 8 Main Very Important Points: 1. Serve the medical call for assistance in a more efficient manner. (97% of our calls.) 2. Emergency rescue personnel will be more readily available for fire and emergency rescue that they are specifically trained and equipped for. Our fire department's primary function is to provide fire and/or emergency rescue services. They are also equipped and trained to handle other disasters like chemical spills, airplane crashes and terrorists acts. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page S of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK 3. Prioritizing calls through our own city controlled/monitored call center, a call center that allocates our resources more efficiently, will provide a more efficient public safety system that will serve the needs of our citizens better. 4. Such a call center system will facilitate cost savings in many areas, such as: vehicle operation costs and a possible reduction in our city's insurance rates to insure our fire department. When our city can prove that our fire department no longer responds to calls they do not need to respond to, insurance rates could well be reduced. 5. Other savings would be realized in a reduction of general maintenance that we presently perform on our fire department vehicles. Most of that maintenance is related to the amount of time the equipment is in actual use on medical response calls. 6. Fuel savings and environmental impact issues -reduction in noise/air pollution. 7. Traffic issues that result from fire trucks answering calls. Various experts suggest that sending large vehicles to calls that they do not need to respond to create traffic flow issues and other potential safety hazards. These are additional liability issues for the city's insurance carriers. 8. Response times will absolutely be improved with our own city controlled and independently monitored call center. This can also be enhanced through the use of GPS monitoring of all public safety vehicles, be they city or contract vehicles/services. Public involvement -which incorporates portable defibrillators strategically placed in public areas and in large private employee facilities. In the well-studied/documented cities of Boston and Seattle, citizens are routinely trained in CPR. When such active participation by the public is incorporated, survival rates dramatically increase. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamoraa Fire District. Page 9 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK REPSONSE TIMES Response times -This committee has extensively researched the "response time". We have concluded there is no tangible evidence of harm to our community as a result of current response times. Is response time important? Can response times be improved? Most certainly, as with cases of cardiac arrest or other major medical issues -but in those cases, the first line of defense is NOT the fire department. Rather, the first line of defense is the pub/ic who are trained in CPR, the use of portable defibrillators, a~ our city's ability to mobilize quick response paramedic ambulance crews that utilize their training to quickly get the ill stabilized and to hospital emergency rooms where the patient can receive the best care possible. Building more fire stations and employing more fire and emergency rescue personnel, based upon the present inefficient and costly model, is NOT in the best interest of public safety or the citizen's tax dollars. Response times can be immediate/y improved with acity-contro/%d ca// center - a call center that is independently controlled by our city, and directed to allocate our safety resources more efficiently. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page SO of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK 24-HOUR SHIFT The present 24-hour shift is an antiquated, inefficient and cost/y mode/. It has many issues surrounding it that pose serious questions and concerns: A. We have also discerned that the 24-hour shift creates too much free time that appears to promote a college fraternity-type atmosphere. Incidents of hazing, misuse of the Internet, personal business conducted on taxpayer's clock, and so on, seems to be an all too familiar pattern. Rancho Cucamonga taxpayers have spent considerable sums of money defending RCFD union members against claims of misconduct. Eliminating the 24-hour shift will aid in reducing the likelihood of misconduct. • The John and Ken Show on KFI 640 AM Radio continues to document such incidents that have occurred in the LA Fire Department System, costing the city millions in law suits and settlements before reaching the courts. 8. There is a lack of accountability for time spent on the c%ck, for when the RCF® was asked to account for time spent, two hours of 24 hours were unaccounted for. C. Fire and emergency rescue personnel attend to personal business on taxpayer's time. D. Personal computer use on the taxpayer's time. Even if the fire department personnel bring in their own computers to work, they are in uniform and on the taxpayer's time. E. Response time is degraded during the average 27% of the shift that our first responders are sleeping. Again, our city needs its own ca// center, so it can better deliver the type of response needed to the type of call received. Sending out fire engines to the 97% of tots/ cal/s that are actua//y medics/ assistance ca//s is not effective and creates significant liabilities and higher operations/ costs. All existing data confirms that survivability is greatly enhanced when a different system of emergency medical response is employed -one that sends an ambulance transport vehicle and Paramedic/EMT 2-person crew. The facts point to a continuing serious potential liability issue, when 97% of a// ca//s are medics/ response ca//s and are answered with a host of expensive and polluting equipment and personnel that are not needed. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho . Cucamonga Fire District. Page li of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK Having fire engines responding to the typical emergency medical calls we receive, does not make any sense because: 1. Such vehicles are slower (less efficient!). 2. Much more expensive to operate (higher costs!). 3. Far more dangerous to operate (potential liabilities!). 4. When improperly deployed to such emergency medical response calls, equipment and personnel are strategically not available for what they are truly intended -fire and emergency rescue. Again, actual research clearly shows that having fire and emergency rescue personnel responding in fire engines and other non-transport vehicles are not the ideal. It is in fact a hindrance to the typical emergency medical response calls that exist. For under the present system, too much time is taken at such calls not doing what is most needed, which is: Getting the patient quickly treated, and transported to the nearest hospital emergency room. This is the most important factor for care of the patient - getting them where trained doctors and nurses are avai/able. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by Tne Rancho Cucamonoa Fire District. Page 12 of 20 October 17, 2007 - CN£CK What Must Be Done A DECIS%ON BY THE CITY OF RANCf00 CUCAMONGA TO iW0l1E FOR A iWORE EFFIC%ENT PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEA9, ONE ThIAT PROPERLY ALLOCATES PUBLIC SAFETY RESOURCES. SUCH A COiWA~70NSENSE WFOVE IS IN9PERATIVE; ESPECIALLY WHEN ONE PROPERLY UNDERSTANDS THAT WE ARE NOT PROVIDING THE BEST CARE POSSIBLE TO THE CITIZENS. BY EMBRACING A COMMONSENSE APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY, THE CITY WILL BE INTRODUCING ANEW MODEL THAT INCORPORATES ALL AVAILABLE RESEARCH WITHIN THE PUBLIC SAFETY INDUSTRY, INCLUDING RESEARCH BY THIS CITIZEN'S GROUP. A NEW MODEL THAT WOULD INCORPORATE A COMPETITIVE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP). In addition to receiving proposes/s from our existing fire district, the city must solicit qualified proposes/s for contracting both our fire and emergency rescue services and emergency medical response services. This would include proposals from the county (as has been done with our Police Department), and through private companies like Rural Metro. Such contracting has proved to be efficient elsewhere and has resulted in potential savings in the millions of dollars per year. Savings of 20% or more are possible. For the city of Rancho Cucamonga not to consider other sources for supplying fire and emergency rescue and emergency medical response services would be irresponsible. It is the duty of our city to look at finding the best possible efficiency and utilization of our tax dollars in the most prudent means available. We are certain that our recommendations have significant merit and wi/i provide: A. Afire and emergency medical response service that will be more efficient and one that will provide better public safety by a more rested staff. B. Fire department systems and emergency medical response services that will provide the citizens with even more first responders at its disposal in the event of a natural or man-made disaster. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 13 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK Consequently, the result of our city and its elected leadership incorporating the findings of this- committee's research wri// require a fundamental chance in fire devartment staffing and how its resources and facilities are used and sJe®loved, whether by using the existing /2CFD or an external agency to provide these services. Also, under the present less efficient system that our fire district employs, the department has incorporated a shift schedule that creates a serious safety issue amongst our firefighter and emergency rescue personnel due to the 24-hour shift. These issues have been explored by a grand jury investigation conducted in Contra Costa County, where they found that a hazard exists due to the 24-hour shift. Contra Costa County Grand Jury found, as this committee also found: A. Too little sleep in a 24-hour shift. B. Massive amounts of overtime that the system has taught the firefighters to manipulate for their financial advantage to the detriment of the taxpayer and the public trust. To Further Illustrate What Forced Overtime Has Created. Actual Average Figures For These Fire Department Personnel i i t BEFORE RETIREMENT Annual Positions Salary• Stipends .`Ba[. Chief $122,158.40 $0.00 Captains $88,641.28 $4,905.89 ;Engineers $75,537.28 $5,279.48 Firefighters $66,015.04 $5,740.18 Typical Sub TOtal Yeary _ _ _ Overtime $122,158.40 $57,373.92 $93,547.17 $60,271.20 $80,816.76 $51,361.20 $71,755.22 $44,893.20 Retirement Analysis Annuai Vosi[ions Salary• V Bat Chief 5122,758.40 (Captains $88,641.28 Engineers $75,537.28 ~ Firefighters $66,015.04 i __ __ _. _- -__ Ave2ge Stipends $0.00 $4,905.89 $5,279.48 $5,740.18 Sub Total $122,158.40 $93,547.17 $80,816.76 $71,755.22 EPMC Premium .Sub Total 4% Salary $10,994.26 $133,152.66 $8,419.25 $101,966.42 $7,273.51 $88,090.27 $6,457.97 $78,213.19 Average Computation Iaxafaos ytvrsi 0.915 D.915 _ 0.915 0.915 Typical Vearly Incomes $179,532.32 $153,818.37 $132,177.96 $116,608.42 Typical Monthly _Inmmes $14,961.03 $12,818.20 $11;014.83 $9,720.70 Avg. Yearly Avg.MOnthly Avg. Monthy Monthly Retirement Retirement Salary Before Gain At i Salary Income Retirement Retirement -; i $121,834.68 $10,152.89 $10,179.87 $26.98 $93,299.27 $7,774.94 $7,386.77 $408.82 `' $80,602.60 $6,716.88 $6,294.77 $422.11 ; $71,565.07 $5,963.76 $5,501.25 $478.35 I ___ ..___ _ _ ~ .J An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 14 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK Also, the newly adopted Memorandum of Understanding, as recently revealed by our own Fire Chief, further emphasizes that massive amount of overtime now becomes a given in: RESOLUTION FD 07-033 (Page 15 of 56) Titled : Work Periods and Overtime A. "The work period for shift personnel is fourteen (14) days. Overtime is paid for time worked in excess of one hundred six (106) hours in the period." Note: The wording does not say "might" be 14 days, but rather states, ~~is". Point A clearly shows the public that "Overtime" is now a given, required part of a basic firefighter and emergency rescue personnel's job description. Also, it is important to note, that overtime has historically been considered a punishment that hourly employees receive when they work more than their contract stipulates. Thus, this is the reason overtime is paid at a higher hourly rate. It is the fiduciary responsibility of any organization, especially our government, who are charged with managing our tax dollars, to maximize efficiency and to minimize costs, especially overtime. Also, overtime could very likely be one of the reason Rancho Cucamonga's Firefighter disability rate is so high (47%). Firefighter disability is an added and extremely expensive cost that creates NO benefit to the tax paying citizens. Also revealed in RESOLUTION FD 07-033, a work period consists of 7-day 24-hour shift twice each month. This computes to: 14 days x 24 hours = 336 hours/month 2 work periods/month = 168 hrs/period or 168 hrs - 106 hrs = 62 hrs. Of automatic overtime per work period! An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 15 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK Which simply means, under the present system, overtime is a given each pay period and computes to at least 36.9% of hours worked. It is also interesting to note that this system, providing overtime as a given, is not seen in any other sector of our economy, as far as our group has been able to determine. Another important point to make at this stage is the fact that although our firefighter gersonne/ are suvvosedly hired on a sa/arv basis, this is not the case at al/. For in reality, all of their compensation relates to either a base hourly pay rate or an overtime hourly pay rate. Any reference to a firefighter salary is completely misleading. It does not give the citizens an accurate picture of how a firefighter is paid with our tax dollars. Our city must clear up this confusing misinformation, and accurately portray the compensation within the fire and emergency rescue department by removing any reference to salary. Or, simply have salary mean salary, with no overtime pay. Such a salary misrepresentation by our government serves only one purpose: Yo Confuse The Public and to Deliberately Distort the Reality! The average firefighter and emergency rescue personnel, after only 4.6 years, is making an average hourly rate of almost $27 per hour, which equates to an overtime rate of over $40 per hour. The 24-Hour shift/14-day work month creates other issues and concerns that firefighters have public/y expressed many times: Firefighters must be away from their families for extended veriod of times. It is clear to this citizen group, and has become abundantly clear to the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, and many firefighters have stated, privately, publicly and in writings, the hardshiv that these 24-hour shifts cause them. Additionally, these 24-hour shifts leave room for manipulation and abuse. Therefore, our committee strongly recommends the elimination of the 24-hour shift, which will have the fol%wing positive results for our firefighters: A. Each firefighter and emergency rescue employee will have at least 16-hours a day home with his or her family. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 16 of 20 October 17, 20D7 -CHECK B. Each firefighter and emergency rescue employee will have at least 48 hours off for each five days worked. C. This will provide a more rested firefighter and emergency rescue employee. D. Amore rested firefighter and emergency rescue employee will mean healthier employees with fewer issues (disabilities) later in their careers, which are currently resulting in disability rates of 47%. E. Amore rested firefighter and emergency rescue employee will also be more efficient. F. Amore rested firefighter and emergency rescue employee means a person less prone to injury. G. With 28% more time off (our proposal), fire department personnel will have more time for their families and involvement in the fabric of our community. H. An eight-hour shift WILL ALSO IMPROVE RESPONSE TIMES, SPECIFICALLY SINCE THEY WILL NOT HAVE TO BE AWAKENED TO RESPOND TO A CALL! I. ULT%P9ATELY AN E%GHT-HOUR SH%FT W%LL REDUCE THE FUTURE COST OF BU%LD%NG LARGE EXPENSIVE F%RE AND EMERGENCY RESCUE STAT%ONS, SINCE WE W%LL NO LONGER HAVE TO PROVIDE ELABORATE K%TCHENS & FACILIT%ES I~!%TH SLEEP%NG QUARTERS YN EVERY STAT%ON. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 17 of 20 October 17, 2007 - CN£CK THE NEED FOR PAID ON-CALL OR LIMITED-TERM FIREFIGHTERS? What is a paid-on call firefighter (POCF)? Firefighters who are not volunteer or career, but receive pay per call, shift, or alarm. What is a limited-term contract firefighter? A firefighter who works as other firefighters but are hired on a limited term, receive no benefits and earn, typically in California, between $9 to $11 per hour. Places like: Recent Advertisement City of Victorville PAID ON-CALL FIREFIGHTER $9.30 PER HOUR/ PART TIME/ NO BENEFITS AND PLACES LIKE, JUST TO NAME A FEW: • City of San Bernardino • San Bernardino County • SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT • City of Pismo Beach City of Redding • City of Gilroy • City of Rocklin • Riverside County • Madera County • City of Avalon To make the 40-hour week functional, we may need to supplement our existing number of firefighter and emergency rescue personnel with additional staffing. This can be accomplished by the city hiring limited-term contract firefighters/POCF. The typical pay range for limited-term contract firefighters is $9 to $15 an hour. This will: A. Double the size of our first responders in a case of a real emergency, like the "big one" and/or a "terrorist act". B. Eliminate vacancy when vacancies come up, eliminating the current once-a- year hiring process. C. Create an apprentice program so a transition from limited-term/paid on-call to full-time fire and emergency rescue will be as seamless as possible. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Oucamonga Fire District. Page 18 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK D. Provide a less cost/y resource to call upon when one of our fulltime firefighter and emergency rescue employee goes on medical, disability, vacation and/or other leave - since a limited-term contract firefighter/emergency rescue personnel would be available and would not entail overtime. Under the present inefficient system ONE/2Y%i+~JE becomes the norm and is extremely and unjustifiably expensive to the taxpayers. As the result of an appropriate allocation of public safety resources, overtime will be significantly reduced, the number of available first responders will be increased, and the savings under this new system could be in the millions of dollars. These financial estimates are based upon information provided by our city, through its finance department. Also, this more efficient system might qua/ify for federal grants from Homeland Security due to our willingness to double our ability to respond to a disaster. NVFC Victory: DHS Changes Rules to Allow Volunteer Firefighters to get Reimbursement for DHS-Sponsored Training WASHINGTON, DC - ... the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced it has changed its guidelines to allow ODP (Office Of Domestic Preparedness) grant funds to be used to provide compensation to volunteer firefighters participating in ODP training and exercises... We will also have these additional resources to respond to surrounding communities in larger emergencies. An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Rre and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 14 of 20 October 17, 2007 -CHECK In conclusion We have studied facts as provided by our city staff -along with other research, and we now clearly understand the facts. These facts confirm the need for close taxpayer scrutiny on systems that deliver our public safety services. The result needed for our city, as directed by its elected leadership, is to incorporate the findings of this committee, along with city staff's additional research to require a fundamental change in fire department staffing and how its resources and facilities are used and deployed thereby creating a new model for fire/emergency rescue end Pmeraencv medical response operations Through the process you will determine whether to accomplish these goals by using the existing RCFD, or an external agency, or both, to provide these services. We trust that the citizens of this community, our city management, and this council appreciate the dedicated hard work, and difficult task we took upon ourselves when we chose to delve into this topic. We hope you understand that our primary goal has been, is, and always will be, to maximize the efficient allocation of public safety resources. This Concludes the: "DETAILS TO THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY" Based upon education and a detailed analysis on what does constitute an appropriate a/location of pub/ic safety resources. This and other information is available at: www. checkgo vernmen tr~raste. org An Independent Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire and Emergency Rescue Services, As currently provided by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Page 20 of 20 October ll, 2007 -CHECK T H E C I T Y O F ~n c, - M O N G A Staff Report DATE: October 17, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J: O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PERMIT PARKING REGULATIONS BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: At the September 19, 2007 City Council meeting, Council Member Rex Guiterrez requested that City staff investigate the feasibility of implementing some type of permit parking restrictions in certain areas of the City. Specifically the request is related to student parking issues in the residential area near Los Osos High School. In reviewing the City's Municipal Code, Chapter 10.50 "Permit Parking Districts" (copy attached) provides the City Council the authority to create permit parking districts by resolution. This chapter also authorizes the City Engineer to establish rules and procedures, and to produce signs, forms, and other materials necessary or appropriate to implement a Preferential Parking Permit Program. According to Chapter 10.50.020 of the Municipal Code, residents who desire a permit parking district must submit a petition signed by seventy-five (75) percent of the residents living within the boundaries of the district that agree or request permit parking privileges. However, the City Council may also establish a permit parking district by resolution. City staff contacted seven (7) nearby valley cities to investigate whether they have regulations regarding Preferential Parking Permit Programs. The survey found that all of these cities already have Preferential Parking Permit Programs in place. City staff inquired as to the amount that other cities charge residents for parking permits, and staff found that most cities do not charge residents for parking permits. However, they do charge to replace lost or stolen permits. The results of this survey are shown in the attached exhibit titled Preferential Parking Permit Program Survey. Based on the information collected, staff has adequate information and guidelines to prepare draft rules and procedures for a Preferential Parking Permit Program in the City of Rancho Cucamonga should the City Council decide to pursue implementation. A sample of draft rules and procedures is attached as Exhibit "B". P189 P190 Page 2 October 17, 2007 DISCUSSION OF PERMIT PARKING REGULATIONS Program Cost: There will be costs associated with operating a Preferential Parking Permit Program. First, there is the cost of materials. Staff estimates the cost of purchasing 1,000 permits to be $500. Second, there would be the cost of staff time required to process the paperwork, to issue the permits, to keep records, and to install traffic signs. The cost of administration will depend on how many permit parking districts are created on a citywide basis, and the size of those districts. Third, there is the cost of enforcement and that will depend on the number of Permit Parking Districts created, and the extent of citizen complaints. It should be noted that the City currently does not have the resources to conduct enforcement of a permit parking district on a proactive basis. Such enforcement would require extensive resources, and based on the experience of other Cities with such programs, it will be costly. It should be noted, however that a Preferential Parking Permit Program will only be effective if it is regularly enforced. As indicated, our Police Department does not have the staff available to regularly inspect Permit Parking Districts for vehicles parking without parking permits. They will however, respond if notified by the residents when there is a violator. CONCLUSION: If the City Council is interested in further considering the implementation of a Preferential Parking Permit Program, it is recommended that the City Council direct staff to work with the Public Works Subcommittee to continue development of the rules and procedures, and to evaluate the fiscal impact to the City as a result of the program implementation. The Subcommittee's findings and recommendations can then be brought back to the City Council for consideration. sectfully submiOtteQd,,~ am J. O'Neil Engineer Attachments: Survey of Local Parking Permit Programs Draft Preferential Parking Permit Program Chapter 10.50 Permit Parking Districts of the City Municipal Code Preferential Parki6~g Pern7~t ~r°®grer~ Survey Parking Cost for Cost for Number of Number of Permit Owner of Guest owner guest Replacement A enc Pro ram Vehicles Permits permits ermits Cost Remarks Chino Yes $12 $12 2 2 4 maximum Proof of residency for more than one vehicle $10 each, the first free permit can be used as a guest permit. Guest permits for special occasions are given a free one Corona Yes Free $10 No limit Free $10 day temporary pass Fontana Yes Free Free No limit 3 Free The $10 guest parking permit fee is refundable if the permit is returned; Owner Parking Permits Montclair Yes Free $10 No limit No limit Free are valid for 2 years Ontario Yes Free Free 2 2 Pomona Yes Free Free No limit No limit Free U land Yes Free Free 3 2 Free P192 b „' r~ ~. 4.. ~~ t:- ~~,.. ~1NCY,0 ~,UC;1~110NGA . ®~~~ PREFERENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM A Preferential Permit Parking Program allows residents of a qualified neighborhood special permits that exempt them and their guests from certain on-street parking time restrictions. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS o A Permit Parking District may be established by resolution of the City Council. Residents requesting the creation of a Permit Parking District must submit a petition signed by seventy-five (75%) of the residents within the boundaries of the proposed district. o A Permit Parking District shall contain at least four blocks or at least one mile of curb frontage. The boundaries of a proposed Permit Parking District shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. ® An application for a parking permit may be made by any resident living within boundary of an approved district. m The applicant must show proof of residence less than 30 days old, and proof of ownership for each vehicle that a parking permit is requested for. RESTRICTIONS A parking permit does not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.44.130 "Storage of Vehicles upon Streets" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.44.130, a vehicle may not park in the same parking space on a public street for more than seventy-two (72) consecutive hours. TYPES OF PERMITS AND DISPLAY There are two types of parking permits available. There are permanent stickers for owned vehicles and transferable guest parking permits. The "permanent sticker" parking permit for an owned vehicle shall be permanently affixed to the lower driver side of the inside of the rear window of the assigned vehicle. The transferable guest parking permit shall be hung from the inside rear view mirror. THc C,LT?~ OF ~A~ICHO vIIC9i~iONGA ~i.;:~~ ~_.,..._..... =.~r~ l~G ~~l ~.:.i 1 ~i ~i<~I ~~,ri. ~~',I>1'U,A~~In I i La'~i aii:P P193 P.1GE 3 NUMBER OF PERMITS ALLOWED A maximum of 3 parking permits may be issued to residents of a single dwelling unit. A maximum of 2 guest parking permits may be issued per residence. EXPIRATION Parking permits for "owned vehicles" are valid from January 1 through December 31 of the current year. Guest parking permits are valid for 30 days from the date of issuance. The $10 deposit for a Guest Parking Permit will be refunded if the permit is returned prior to the expiration date. COST TO RESIDENTS . Parking permit for owned vehicles Guest Parking Permit Permit replacement FREE $10 (refundable deposit) $10 TO OBTAIN A PARKING PERMIT You may obtain a parking permit in person Monday through Thursday, 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 or by mailing your information to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Parking Permit Coordinator P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Residents must provide proof of residency less than 30 days old in one of the following forms: Current utility bill, bank statement, credit card bill, or other bill statement that was sent through the mail on a monthly billing cycle Rental/lease agreement signed within the last 30 days Proof of property ownership, tax bill or new escrow papers Rental/lease agreement signed within the last 30 days Residents must also provide the following: Valid picture I.D. This may be a driver's license, California I.D., passport, or military I.D. Copy of the vehicle registration (Note: the resident must be the registered owner.) _ _ .. ,.. ~~n _ r..i nno i ,~ a-lui. I:.,.. 0f~01~i?R~O. www.C~-ra OChn-UicoTnnnA~.Ca.ui P194 P:\GL 3 Company cars and family vehicles not registered to you require a letter from the registered owner authorizing you to use the vehicle and referencing the vehicle's license plate number. REPLACEMENT PERMITS If your permit is lost or stolen, the replacement fee is $10. If your Guest Parking Permit is lost or stolen, the replacement cost is $10. FINE FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS Fine per violation $30 For additional information about the City's Preferential Permit Parking Program, please call the Engineering Division at (909) 477-2740. P195 10.50.010 Chapter 10.50 PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS Sections: 10.50.010 Definitions. 10.50.020 Designation of permit parking districts-Findings. 10.50.030 Minimum size. 10.50.040 Petitions. 10.50.050 Signs. 10.50.060 Exemption for permit holders. 10.50.070 Issuance of permits. 10.50.080 Guest parking permits. 10.50.090 Display of permits. 10.50.100 Exempt vehicles. 10.50.110 Authority of the engineer. 10.50.120 Dissolution of permit parking district. 10.50.130 Penal provisions. 10.50.010 Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings: A. "Engineer" means the city engineer of the city of Rancho Cucamonga or his or her designee. B. "Permit parking district" means an area established by resolution of the city council wherein parking restrictions apply to all vehicles except ve- hicles which have been issued a parking permit pursuant to this chapter and vehicles exempted by Section 10.50.100. C. "Resident" means a person who lives in a dwelling unit located within a permit parking district. D. "Guest" means any person visiting or in- tending to visit a resident in a permit parking dis- trict. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.020 Designation of permit parking districts-Findings. The city council may establish permit parking districts by resolution. Any such resolution shall designate the boundaries of the permit parking dis- trict and shall specify the nature of the parking limi- tations which apply within the district to operators of vehicles other than vehicles which have been is- sued apermit pursuant to this chapter, or which are exempted from this chapter pursuant to Section 10.50.100. Every such resolution shall be based on the findings as follows: A. Commuter vehicles, defined as those vehi- cles operated by persons whose destinations are to nonresidential areas or uses, do or may substan- tially and regularly interfere with the use of the ma- jority of available parking spaces for use of resi- dents; B. The interference by commuter vehicles oc- curs at regular and significant daily or weekly inter- vals; C. That the commuter vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit narking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution or devaluation of real property in such proposed dis- trict; D. That seventy-five percent of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by city council action in absence of a petition); E. That no unreasonable displacement of commuter vehicles will result into surrounding resi- dential areas; F. That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is fea- sible or practical. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.030 Minimum size. Permit parking districts shall contain at least four blocks or at least one mile curb frontage. (Ord. 39- C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.040 Petitions. Residents may petition the city council for the establishing of a permit parking district. Any such petition shall designate the boundaries of the pro- posed district and shall be signed by at least sev- enty-five percent of the residents within the pro- posed district. Such a petition shall be filed with the engineer who shall prepare a report to the city council on the proposed district, including the engi- neer's recommendations regarding the es- tablishment thereof. The engineer shall forward his report together with the petition t0 the City Council. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the city council tc establish a permit parking district in the absence of such a petition. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.050 Signs. Upon the establishment of a permit parking dis- trict, the engineer shall cause appropriate signs to 247 P196 10.50.060 be erected in the district, indicating thereon the parking limitation applicable to the district and the exemption therefrom of vehicles with permits. The regulations pertaining to any permit parking disirict shall not apply until signs or markings giving ade- quate notice thereof have been placed. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (Part), 1988) 10.50.060 Exemption for permit holders. The parking limitations imposed within a permit parking district pursuant to this chapter shall not apply to vehicles for which a parking permit pertain- ing to that district has been issued and displayed in the manner prescribed in Section 10.50.090. No such permit shall reserve any particular parking place within the district to the holder of the permit. Each such permit shall be valid only for the permit parking district for which it is issued. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (Part), 1988) 10.50.070 Issuance of permits. Applications for permits to park within a permit parking district may be made by any resident within such district. Such applications shall be filed with the engineer. Unless otherwise prescribed by the resolution establishing the district, not more than three permits (exclusive of guest parking permits) shall be issued to residents of any single dwelling unit. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the engineer may appeal such decision to the city manager, whose decision on the matter shall be final. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1986) 10.50.080 Guest parking permits. Unless otherwise prescribed in the resolution establishing a permit parking district, each resident holding a parking permit shall be entitled to receive guest parking permit forms from the engineer. The use of guest parking permits shall be designated in the resolution establishing the permit parking dis- trict. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.090 Display of permits. A. A parking permit issued pursuant to this chapter (other than a guest parking permit) shall be permanently affixed to the lower driver side of the inside of the rear window of the vehicle for which it was issued. B. Guest parking permits shall be displayed face up on the driver front dashboard of the vehicle for which it was issued. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (Dart), 1988) 10.50.100 Exempt vehicles. The follov:ing vehicles are exempt from the park• ing restrictions applicable to any permit parking dis- trict: A. Repair, maintenance, refuse collection, util- ity, delivery and service vehicles being used in the course of business; B. Vehicles owned or operated by any gov- ernmental agency, or contractor of a governmental agency, being used in the course of business. C. Emergency, life support and health care vehicles being used in the course of business. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.110 Authority of the engineer. The engineer is authorized to establish rules and procedures and to produce signs, forms and other materials necessary or appropriate to implement the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.120 Dissolution of permit parking district. The city council may, by resolution, terminate and dissolve any previously established permit . parking district. (Ord. 39-C § 1 (part), 1988) 10.50.130 Penal provisions. A. Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter no person shall stand or park a motor vehi- cle in any permit parking district in violation of any parking restrictions established pursuant to this chapter. B. No person shall falsely represent himself or herself as eligible for a parking permit or furnish false information to the engineer or his representa- tives in an application for a parking permit. C. No person who has been issued a parking permit shall thereafter allow the use thereof by any other person. D. No person shall copy, produce, create or use any facsimile or counterfeit parking permit. E. Any act or omission declared unlawful by the provisions of this chapter is an infraction pun- ishable by a fine not to exceed that set by the cur- rent uniform county-wide bail schedule pursuant to the terms of the California Vehicle Code. (Ord. 39- C § 1 (part), 1988) 248 r Permit Parking Distri • Chapter-10.50 "Permit Parking Districts" of the City Municipal Code grants the City Council the authority to create permit parking districts by resolution. • Residents may request a Permit -Parking District by submitting a petition signed by 75% of residents living within the boundaries of the proposed district. Permit Parking Districts • Authorizes the City Engineer to establish. rules and procedures, and to produce signs, forms, and other materials necessary to implement a permit parking program. ~_ ~ ~ ~ a ~n ~ L L Q a~ c N y ~ N N m N N L N " N •V C O w ` .. ~ N O °~ '~ ~ E ~ O w ~ ~ i a w N N a E N y O d Q (6 O N ~ U N E N Y ""' f6 T C ~ ~ ` d y ~ N ~ ~ (6 fl- w .N- N w d ~ d to ~ N ~ N ~ ~ m m ~ N L E ~ a~ V c C7 d ~ "C d w o L U C ~ E O ~ ~° !3 X f6 •~ a> ~ .. = ~ N ~ ~ fA w N ~ ~ N ~ ~ U U ` ~ ~ ~ ~t a C o N a N n o (6 a L H- .~ ~ i. O ~ ~+ ~+ V c0 ~ N N N y - O N N N N o d _ ~{} li LL LL LL U ~ ~ d ~+ N N + .r .r ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ E N ~ M N ' N 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ o a Z Z o ` y ,~ ,,., ~ ,,., o ~ ~, _ E E E ~ c E N . . «: . o ~ N M ~ 3 ~ p p ~ . o .N p ~ o Z Z o a ~ Z Z Z ~ w N N = 7 ~ N O N N O N N N N N N N U ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ li ~ e~ Li li Li L ~ y w ~ L ++ d V N N N N N ~ N N C L ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL U Q > as ` Y N ~ N N N N N ~ a o ~ ~- ~- ~- r ~ ~ a ` a c d c o c ~ o a Q o I ca ~ ~~ o c C i0 ~ c m ~ (6 U U ii ~ O a ~ ~, y i 2 ~ \ J ~° 1 I ~~i ~ -~, s. I _ ~ o v , ~ c ~ sys - ~, o~ - - o ~ osOs I ;x. o ~ ~ > ~ -~ ~a. ~ ~, ~ ~ x.. U ~ i t a ~ ~ ~ ~ L r - i. w~ p ,J ~ I 1i N L J W ~ ~ C ~ ~ I ~, r ~ ~ y V w ~ ~ ~ T =i r- i I i s. ~ ~ -i r r _ ! _ 1 .. _ ~ ~" i ~~ - ~ I~ - - ~ I v ~a O ~4 ~. 1 u~ x .~ :~~ ~~ ,~' V j ~' a ,:\, e ,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ^'*~ G J ~~ \~ •~_ r ~~ J ~ S `~ ~ v ~~ ~~ ~` .~ \7 `V YC !' N G L ~, a ~ i ^O ~ O y ~'. ,C = E o t O "' .fl i C y ~ U 7 p L i U w `° y'' a o v 3 ~ ~' en ~ 0 ~.4 ~ L ~ L G ~ cC N _ ~ t R L •,T U o u_ y O •3 ~ L L ~~ ~ ~ L ~ C v .~ ~ ~ C s. u ~ 7 ~C '0 O C. ~> O y .c c ~ c= ~ p •~ L L ~ C' ~ L L q A o ~ d R '; d .~ y. "~ O +" R °3 V = +' O = Y r 'C .~, - •~ ~ h ~' L 'O O C S ~ u 3 y bLn o ' .. w ~ ~ r 9 R o ~~ C ,o a+ L~ ~ ~ 7 A i G R \ !'.' ,f~ -emu ~~t-'~. // Y e bC ~ xor ro scams ~I W (J I ~.~ I 4 ----- ~~ _---------BRSELfNE-RD---------=--- - - i- --------- ~ ~ u ~ ~ w TE BkJRY i - - -- - ~ - ---~ ®® II i w ®® I i ~ i ~ I __-_--N ~ ~ ® i I 2 ~ j NKL-IN-DR- ~ Z 1 ® ~ ® i ~ ~ VVC-W DR 1 ®®® ~ c -.WOOD ~~'~_~ - -- - - - - -~ --- - s ci ~ 1 - --- --- i DR` ~~n ----' 1 E5B1~ .~ ~ - _- 1 rfiTm~ ~ q,Y-WEBS _ ~ ~"C~ i ---- VI~tP-PA _--ysTR~P~ ~ i SER~P .1 1 \ ~~~~ i 1 D ~ ~ D ~ n ~ ~ II ~[~~ \• ~. LTY1 ~ ----_~_ 9! 1 1 \~ ~~ / ~~~ .. • COSTS: • Materials (Permits) • Postage • Record keeping • Signs and installation • Enforcement P197 RESOLUTION NO. 07-249 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE GOVERNOR, LEGISLATURE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO JOIN THE CITY IN ADVOCATING THE REVISION OF PROPOSITION 215 TO MINIMIZE THE ABUSE OF MARIJUANA WHEREAS, Marijuana is the most widely abused drug in the United States; and WHEREAS, current trends suggest an explosion in the number of marijuana drug houses discovered in the Inland Valley region of Southern California and beyond; and WHEREAS, in 2006, authorities destroyed over 1.1 billion marijuana plants grown on California public lands alone, with a street value of over $4.5 billion; and WHEREAS, in just athree-month period from March, 2007 to May, 2007, authorities seized 7,850 pounds of marijuana from private Inland Valley locations, as well as over 13,000 plants worth over $100 million; and rings; and WHEREAS, several marijuana grow houses have been linked to organized crime WHEREAS, neither the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), the American Medical Association (AMA), nor the United States Supreme Court has recognized the use of smoked marijuana as medicine, and will not rule out the possibility of harmful effects attributed to marijuana smoking; and WHEREAS, marijuana retards motivation in its users, and is a "gateway' drug, playing a significant role in leading to the use of other illegal drugs like heroin and cocaine; and WHEREAS, loopholes in Proposition 215, the medical marijuana initiative passed into law hurt law enforcement's efforts to combat drug trafficking; and WHEREAS, while the use of marijuana for the terminally or chronically ill is not being condemned it is believed that serious loopholes exist in Proposition 215 that permit the abuse of current drug laws, and allow drug dealers to avoid arrest and prosecution; and WHEREAS, a loophole in Proposition 215 allows users to possess large quantities of marijuana and allows doctors to recommend marijuana use by mail order, without an examination or prescription, and allows marijuana users to avoid arrest by merely stating that they have a doctor's clearance, while not being required to present evidence of such a clearance; and P198 WHEREAS, Proposition 215 allows the proliferation of marijuana as an industry, with no FDA approval and no consumer protection; and WHEREAS, THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, is already available by prescription as the FDA-approved drug Marinol. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the Mayor and members of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby urge the Governor, Legislature, and local governments to join the City in advocating for the revision of Proposition 215 to minimize the abuse of marijuana. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCxo ~,;UCAMONGA October 17, 2007 Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor of California State Capitol Building Sacramento, California 95814 Mayor DeNALC J. Kunrit, M.D. Idayor Prc Tem DIANE WILLIM<.S Counci(memberr REX GUTIERREZ L. DENNIS MICHAEL SAM $PAGNOLO City Manager :K LAM, AICP pia Subject: State Law v. Federal Law -Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Dear Governor Schwarzenegger: On behalf of the City Council, I would like to share our concerns about the discrepancy between State law, brought into effect by the passage of Proposition 215, and existing Federal law. Although existing Federal law clearly outlaws the use of marijuana, Proposition 215, passed by California voters, has brought about the development of medical marijuana dispensaries, homes that are used for growing marijuana, and other concerns that may expand the potential availability of marijuana to a larger population in California. We would encourage you to look into this important matter and consider solutions that may address these concerns. Please contact me if I can provide additional information. Sincerely, Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Mayor cc: State Senator Bob Dutton State Assemblymember Bill Emmerson Joe Gonsalves & Son Pam Easter, Assistant City Manager John Gillison, Administrative Services Director Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Joseph Cusimano, Police Chief James Markman, City Attorney James Troyer, City Planner 10500 Civic Center Dc • PO. Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 • Tel 909-477-2700 • Fax 909-477-2849 • www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us