Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/10/17 - Agenda Packet - Special 4:30 pma o AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING Wednesday, October 17, 2007 O 4:30 p.m. Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 4 Chaffey Room 10500 Civic Center Drive 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Mayor/Chairman Kurth Mayor Pro TemNice Chairman Williams Councilmembers/Agencymembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo B. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This (s the time and place far the general public to address the City Council and Redevelopment Agency on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Council and Agency from addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council and Agency may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Counclland Agency, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business Items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume afterthe regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. C. ITEM OF DISCUSSION CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION OF THE RELOCATION APPEALS BOARD IN A MATTER OF RELOCATION ASSISTANCE -JOHNNY CRAWFORD AND MAQUITA STOVAL CRAWFORD D. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 11, 2007, per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. MEMORANDUM REDEVELOP\ILNT AGENCY Date To: From: October 11.2007 Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Board Members Jack Lam. AICP. Executive Director James L. Markman, Agency Counsel,, ~~~ r ~ ~~~ ~w~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: OCTOBER 17, 2007 AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER THE RELOCATION BOARD'S DECISION REGARDING JOHNNY CRAWFORD AND MAQUITA STOVALL CRAWFORD Attached you will find an informational packet containing background information relative to appeals filed by Johnny Crawford and Maquita Stovall Crawford relative to the amount of benefit paid as a result of their relocation from Pepperwood Apartments. The former tenants' filed their initial appeal and request for an informal hearing before the Redevelopment Agency Director in March 2007. The Director's decision was appealed with a request for a Formal Director hearing in May 2007. The tenants' then appealed the formal decision and requested a Relocation Board Hearing in July 2007. At each phase of the hearings the tenant was able to present additional evidence grid testimony for consideration, as well as had the right to be represented by legal counsel. Once the Relocation Board has made a determination based on all evidence and testimony, that decision must be presented to the Redevelopment Agency Board for final determination. The tenant may provide no further evidence for consideration by the Agency Board, but may provide testimony and be represented by legal counsel. The Agency Board may approve, modify or set aside the Relocation Board decision. The packet is being provided to enable you to become familiar with the information prior to the hearing. Following the City Council Workshop and prior to the beginning of the Special Meeting at 4:30 p.m., the Redevelopment Agency Board will be briefed on the proceedings by Craig Fox, Deputy Counsel to the Agency in this matter. Enclosure RELOCATION BOARD HEARING TRANSCRIPT FOR MR. JOHNNY CRAWFORD AND MRS. MAQUITA STOVALL-CRAWFORD Chaffey Conference Room July 10, 2007 r.~ TAB 1........... Approved Peppenvood Relocation Plan TAB 2........... 90 Day Notice to Vacate TAB 3........... Notice of Displacement/Eligibility for Relocation Benefits Tenant's Income Qualification TAB 4........... Initial Rental Assistance Form Signed by Tenant August 1, 2006 _.~ ~ _ __ ~ He o........... Final Reniai Hssisiance Form signed by i enant Hugust 'i i , ~uuFi Relocation Consultant Statement TAB 6........... Comparable Units used as Basis for Final Rental Assistance TAB 7 ............ Consultant's Inspection of Replacement Rental Unit; Lewis Apartments Rental Reservation Agreement dated 7/10/06 Tenant's Termination Notice for Pepperwood Apartments dated 7/28/06 TAB 8....... .... Grievance Procedures TAB 9 ...... .... Appeals Filed by Tenant TAB 10..... .... July 10, 2007 Relocation Board Appeal Hearing TAB 11..... .... July 10, 2007 Relocation Board Hearing Transcript TAB 12..... .... May 16, 2007 Formal Director's Appeal Haring TAB 13..... .... May 16, 2007 Formal Hearing Transcript TAB 14 .... .... March 12, 2007 Informal Director's Appeal TAB 15..... .... Supporting Documents -~ D 00 RESOLUTION N0. RA 06-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE RELOCATION PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH PEPPERWOOD APARTMENTS RECITALS: FOLLOWS: THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HEREBY RESOLVES AS SECTION 1: The Ranch Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("Agency') is a municipal body, corporate and politic. SECTION 2: The Agency desires to implement the California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code Section 7260 et seo.) and the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601 et Seq.) SECTION 3: The Agency desires to ensure that relocation payments and assistance will be administered in a fair, reasonable and uniform manner, as promptly as possible to persons and businesses displaced as a result of acquisition of real property by the Agency. SECTION 4: The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency hereby finds and determines that: A. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency does hereby approve and adopt, for any tenant displaced by the acquisition of Pepperwood Apartments, the Relocation Plan, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Said Relocation Plan conforms with the requirements of the California "Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines" as provided in the California Code of Regulations, Title 25, "Department of Housing and Community Development Programs', Chapter 5, Subchapter 1 (commencing with Section 6000) ("State Guidelines') and as the State Guidelines may be amended from time to time. B. The Redevelopment Direction is hereby authorized and directed to make the Relocation Plan available at the offices of the City Clerk for inspection by all interested persons. Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 2 of 49 SECTION 5: The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based on the record before the Redevelopment Agency on August 2, 2006, when it adopted the Resolution, iricluding the Staff Report dated August 2, 2006, all documents referenced and incorporated in the Staff Report, the testimony at the hearing, and the records and documents prepared in connection with the Project, all of which are incorporated in this Kesoiution by reference. SECTION 6: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause this Resolution and her certification to be entered in the Book of Resolutions of the Redevelopment Agency. Please see (he following page for formal atlaption, cerfillcaHOn and signatures c- Resolution No. RA D6-007 Page 3 of 49 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2"d day of August 2006. AYES: Alexander, Gutierrez, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None ~~ ATTEST: ~J~c am, Secretary I, JACK LAM, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 2"d day of August 2006. Executed this 3rd day of August 2006, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Jack-----t ~~retary --- EXHIBIT A Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 4 of 49 Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 5 of 49 Pepperwood Apartrnents RELOCATION PLAN 6-26-06 Prepared for: LINC Housing Prepared by: Pearce Consulting, Inc. 34:7 - 10"' Street,, Seal Beach, Ca. 90740 r~ L...J Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 6 of 49 INTRODUCTION The proposed Project Is located at 9055 Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 91730, County of San Bemardino. California and is proposed to be unr:artaken b~d LINC I-icusinn Corootaiion (or it's designee) of 110 Pine, Long Beach. California, 90277 (the Client}. One of tt~e missions of LINC Housing, a nor. profit cryanization. is to improve the housing conditions for very lo~h~ and lower income residents in fhe state of California and especially the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The proposed project shall be carried out in conjunction with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The Client has owned fhe property since May 1, 200n, should their tax credit application he awarded, they will oversee and carry out the relocation of any prospective displaced tenants and the .renovationlconstruction of the improvements. They have retained Pearce Consulting, Inc., a professional relocation and real estate firm tc oversee the on site relocations. The location of the proposed projedt is in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in San Bernardino County. The project consists of one property on one parcel. The property is seven (7) two-story buildings, with a Total of 230 units. There are fifty (50) studio apartments, one hundred and twenty-eight (Y28j one bedroom units, fifty-two (~2} two bedroom units. In order to evaluate the present circumstances and re-housing requirements of any households which might he permanently displaced by the develupmenf of 'the project. the following Relocation Plan (the 'Plan'}' has been prepared, Subsequent relocation assistance for the Project will be provided in accordance with the standards, and provisions of the State of California Relocation Law, Government Code Section 72u0, et. Seq., and Title 25, Chapter 5, Relocation Assistance ~.nd Real Property Acquisition, as amended January 1, 1998; as well as fhe Federal Housing and Urban Development Department's Tenant Assistance, Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Handbook 1378, Changes 1-4, commonly known as URA guidelines. Tha site and improvements shad be remodeled by the non-profit orcanization, the Client, for the purpose of creating refurbished rental housing units of affordable housing for families already residing in the' project. The exact sizes of the units v/iif not change, but the property and units will be substantially refurbished and shalt continue to operate as affordable housing units. Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 7 of 49 This Plan addresses the follo:ving: 1. A description of the Project area Generally, and the specific Project site i Cc+rtinn 1' 2. An assessment of the aygregate relocation requiremehts of persons/households who andror which-may be relocated as a result of the implementation of, the Project. including. survey methods and results (Section IL): 3. kn assessment as to the availability of comparable replacemerit housing resources/costs vJithin the city of P.ancho Cucamonga, California (Section Ill:j: and. d. l'he steps and procedures that LING Housing (the cliertj wilt foliovJab . insure a satisfactory and thorough reloca?ion program (Section I:V.j. _.- ~. e .::a:'. I Fi VJrinhrnnod r t J 1 a ? -S. . 1•, ^ F r.. -."+w4.1, ~ ' w1 ~~/ MCrjav Z V I ~ _ 1'JI[ 1 I v - ~ rJe '{' Is :B~s 1. _ . . AMUr 5 r ~ r \sJ- --.. . ~. ''aar ~ ~ YIh Cm¢k >~. Etn+lm Ilw a.a rx t[~ -N1~C :... ' s iw .7,z'"~ . I,twnun '• :har . '~gc i 'Cedarplnes -.~ ~~. `J~ Park A,6 ~_ °IS - ,~~~-.,~~ :Mount EiatdY Gi,v~rw^9a -~' t - a\ ~ ~ Creslnre ~~~, .~. Fr.il ' ~• . r ~-.~ -"'~ NPwbErr 16 :' S f N~ F fi N D I~ O > I :.- \ -tdeTOnal .. ' Park ~ /i 1San hntOnt FepperWOCd APar'Jnerls r ~ - Hemhts y 155 FOOthill [i1:fT /~~ I r j . L O tJ G E E E .. r ~ ~ Musuy t ~ _. 1„LCno Cu.anon9a V n '~0 z fi ,. Azusa.. GG lcridora ~ 1 1i0p~„ ~ io lAUrde.'IaJh4W } aoi`i "'~I La'E¢mt~'. C AFL I F ( ~.n ~~~ Yy (^pp.Gnnl l i ilSrE E Ik 9~ froN I ~ I I. I '. ar ".~`~.,~.~'_..,-° ~ ~ ~ - Yr _ rs .-. Fontana r Bernardiit I ~ . ' Uplantl s j C Rtaittrc. M J Baldwm~~l ~ f Sd R.~IrL aS 9 ) O L.. ~ { _ ~ 1 ~L I 1 ;.. .,~ rCYa~ter Qak Clar cbi - .i.Ra ho ~- ` FarK -o oulh est Lille Learue P,a I ~'~' a - t sr r ~ I Cu monaa I 3 ~ I t 1- . : 7 -~,-rCv~ ma-'., r tAoiJfClat ~. - 1~ith, t ~-_: - Colto ~y _ . . 1'~' wfSC_COYIna' I ~ ul OOdt~.rG - ~ ~'~ 'OOnt ngtort ~ - I): ~: < _ Pomgna ff ~ ,~ ~ ,~ Y.afserl ~ I I :_r ~~, ;~~ J~ Vam a RZ - o t, F~eir1l venuCr ~1 ~ '">• ~ e _ I ~ r 1 n J r ~. t. rlat VlairGt - ~ \ F -' ~ ~- .~ ~ 1~ : ' ` Gta~d ~L.a Pucnte -~, yy'R"`^~.r ce !'~_1C -h t+~ tle .RL - so ounnyslope.'~ ,=7e ax _ ~' DParnond i ~ :- a ~ I _ °~ `O ' Hier ae '~'- f ~ IChlno ~ -~ Glen AOO1 ``c p .. i68Pwland,- - Bar :>, .,. dlsonA. ~f a>.lwn ~. .:~~ _ - • Chln Hills I'Ic1~t ht>f ao '-' ~ '- -~ I Rutiidoux '~° . li I + -...c ~,_ ._. I i -... Cn no Hr{gn .~ Pe Alev , ~-- I . _ ._ i t. shm~ Or1 m ., ~ ~-' ~ Rrverstde" I it -r E N () f _- P- k t as Sert Hi011s f~. ~lorcor ~~ ~ `fal.1>1Ya , r ~ purcJ - , ... A r.Jr FYI- ~~ , r ' Chiiio ~ ~ I . ?( o a Habra ~ ? b a ~ so~ '' ro rea - State Perk t .~- `~. ~ '~$ r :, I 'O-'. ~' ~ ~Peh' f~ _ F~el ~r6 ~ I Y, ~'~ ~~ o ~ ' Moreno Va 1~Y I, : v e ct ,u~-vG0[9na Rome Carom. ' '~ 1NOCdcrast I- Fu(lert~ nPlacenfia '~,~ ~~~ •~ 1 \ i_ HCi -+- .. ~ -O.R F it ::_ L1; 5obrae% `- r. B. PROJECT SITE LOCATION The specific site of the proposed Project'is identifie<; ./ithin the map on the next pane. (See: Figure 2: Project. Site). The. specific Project Siie location is south of FooG'~ill Elvd. and east of \/.nova rrl A\rr ruu v/irhln the CdV Ot Ran,^.ho Cucarnonoa. , I ,,... v . Can d~~++ood_~t ~ 9 ~ ? ` ~ ~ti a t a L ~: ~ di I ~. ..':. p .._ ~~ Retl Hill -. -communi[ P ark G .._. ` .. Yew $1 ., , ~ , g ... ,, J O cQ .v c Yew-Sl l i .. ... .. _ ___... .tc V S ': .. r v~..r~ui_' S1..a~ ~ ;; ~E .~_~. .-~_. ... : _ __ . . .. ChufCn-.SG . ~._ "'" 2 m f m ,.. 9 ° . ` 1 I ~ _ i _'__ > vra =Nuerla yo He,iilocH Si ~: i ~ ~ a fiErr iD I. SC I , N ' L i E I _ _ s~ -, -~ r I ~rcn S I ,~ i m J ~ ~~ il z ~ > ~ I I < ~. Bryon-S1~= n ~_` _-' I ; r , n .. C ~ I " - Tr`fOf S1,! ~ _ r .:. ~~~. .__ r: I .. ;Z n,. , -.I r=Eften Si s - i ' a PepPerwoen Ypa R.mCns : ~ ~ I . ~ - .. ~ ; ~ _":._ ba-- -" cZ _ _ ' ;,,- ?' 9R5 Foo'IVII at d ,' ...__ _. RanChO Qrtamcnpa .1~ 9170 _}cln0 R3=_ ~ _ Q Q f, ed=Hi11 _o ^ Es a S `. ~ , ~! FooihiU 431vd - - ~- .. I R ancho•Cucamonga , i {r . .___, _._.. -- :.Hampshire St: --- , . ~ • _ r ... I r :.. l i I i I I ` i _. ...~ __ - ~ i C pit-S1 . __ _ '::. y i'~ { r . ^, . G _. <--.Devon Sl m..: > ' -- ~ - ~ - , ~ ~ , I N - :- ~~ D_ c '- C-.f anG"St~ I. Y I - - - ry., .. c~, Gulch ! ParR CaLe~ejai - i - .. ~ , i I G'ai(e~V a : ' . 3 _ s ~ J r _ . 'Ca~Ic- Veiar __._ © __. .. __. __...: AirD+v. Hwy- -- - - i;J .. _- ~ - 1 ~ Salma S! ~ u _ o :. .~,_ I < ~ .. I I ~ - - ~~ -~- ~. __ .. ._--__ ._..__ ,,,a.~~ -._~____ -- _ Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 12 of 49 C. GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC & HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS Population and Growth Rate Neighborhood Profile -Population and.;Ethnicity . Tha name "Qrcan~ronaa" is derived from a Shoshone word meaning "sandy place". The history of the area begins with the original Native American settlement. The ivlission Gabriel established the "Rancho Cucamonga" as a site for grazing cattle.. In 1839 the.rancho was granted by the hAexican governor of California to Tiburcio Tapia, a wealthy Los Angeles merchant. It was sold in 185840 John Pains by Tapia's daughter. American forces invaded California in 184b, annexed it in-1848, and made it a state in 185D. The area v.^as a major transportation.hub: the-wagon trail over Cajon Pass to the Mission San Gabrisf vaas follotived by the , Butterfield Stagecoach line in 1858, the Union Pacific Railroad in 1887, . and the Pacific Electric Railway Line in 1913. The City of Rancho Cucamonga was incorporated in:1977, as a result of a merger among the unincorporated communities of Alta Loma; Cucamonga, and Eti•r.anda. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a relatively diverse City of some one hundred twenty seven housand{1.27,743.] t~ersdns as of the 2000 census:: The project lies within the. 91730.zip code.',area ~f Rancho Cucamonga, which has a population of 5T;969 wiih an'aberage Household size. of-2.91 and average family size of 3:40. The median.resident.age.is 30.4 years. Ethnicity -City of Rancho Cucamonga;,Cahfornia The year 2000 Census reported. 127,743 total populafions.:The ethnic mix. in the City area of zip code 91730 was' 18;5G5.Hispanic; 3(1,453 Ulhife Nan-Hispanic; 5,138- Elack; 2,67J Asian; A54 American Indian and ;the remaining being other races. Household IncomelHouse.Value San Bernardino CountyfVledien househoid income rs!~57,500.as of 2D06;. in the 2000 census it was- $50;047 and'. the median house. value::was $149-, 300. The average household in the City of Rancho Cucamonga has continued to grow since the 2000 Census. There are currently approximately twenty six thousand housing units v.~ithin the 39.02 square miles cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Section II Relocation Requirements ASSESSMENT OF RELOCATION NEEDS A. Project and Impact Development of the Pepperwood Apartments in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California will involve the permanent displacement of only those residents of Peppenf~ood v.~ho do not certify as income eligible. It'is. presently projected that approximately forty five percent (45%) of the residents wilt be permanently displaced due.to their income status. During the rehab and .remodeling cf each unit and the facades of.all seven::(7) buildinys there will be no anticipated.n.eed.for.onsite moves: Rather, it is expected that residents will. be able to .reside within their units. during renovation. Any tenants-who took occupancy: pursuant io the Amended and Restated P.egulaiory Agreement and .Declaration. of Restrictive Covenants dated August 1,:1993,.may not oe required to telocate, unless such tenant has breached their lease. Two Hundred and nineteen ..(219)- units-'were occupied at tt;e time of survey canducted during tt~e week of fvtay 1. 2006;:. Persdttal contact was attempted to be made with' the occupants..of all occupiedrunits... While some units were not:able:to be interviewed information wasreceived:from one hundred seventy (170) of.the residenfs.' .Consequently, the response rate from the occupied units was seventy. seven (77%). Fdrthd purposes of analysis, a twenty percent (20%)r response is traditionally considered'to provide "statistical significance".This responses rate fs;very good: Of the one hundred: seventy.(i70) units in#er~~~we~, fourteen. (1 :j- were . vacant From the households.providng complete information ai the tihe of survey for the preparation. i~f this Pfan ahei`e?vJetea~r~o hundred`.forty nine (249) adults, thirty two:(32)'cliildreri; within tte tctal';population of the-units interviewed; eight (Sj of whom can be classified as 'Elderly', having. reached the age of si>cty tevn:'(62) years or more and;,seven (7) of which. Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 14 of 49 are disabled persons: Thin creates a totalrknown populatfomwithin those units intervie~~;ed of two hundred forty nine (249} persons of all ages; at an average density of only one point six four (1.64} persons per dv:~elling unit. B. Methodology Information presented, herein, is based upon actual tgnant interviews. The information obtained is from initial interviews. conducted individually by Pearce Consulting, Inc. personnel. In the event the proposed Project proceeds, immediately prior to any . requisite relocation follovf-up Household interviews will be conducted by' relocation persa+inel and, inquiries made of residential occupants will include household size, family composition, income, current rent, length and type of occupancy, disabilities and health problems (if any) and location preferences related to replacement housing. C. Survey Data Fcr planning purposes and, based upon preliminary interviews and demographic data. available, it has been,delermined that there are two hundred nineteen (2 9} households presently residing with the site df she proposed Project, due to the eleven vacant units .Eighf.(8)'elderly residents reside in the Pep,penrvood Prolect:apartmetits: Special consideration vdill be given for those households in ,which the. elderly may be found to reside, to the extent their ihtlividual circumstgnces may warrant attention,in:`terms of residing rh._proxiii~ity to m~dibal services and public transportation-corridors:,- as well:as the; type of, and physical fitments related tp any replacement housing which ig. proposed. a. Project OccupancylOvercrowding Average occupancy among.ahe one hundred seventy (170j~ respondehf households is one point six four ('1,G4] persons per::dwelling'init..Based upon a review of the number df persons, residing in each of the uni4; none of the households are overcrowded by_the-standard of'`two„plus-one"; that is to say, two (2} persons pet+t~edroom; and one (1,} accommodated in a habitable morn suitable for sleeping Being ganerous;.if occupying a one- bedroom unit ona should: °upgrarie" a tau[-person -same sex household from tlaeur',it within which ihe`,r presently reside, to a two-bedroorn~unit. Resolution No. RA 06-007 -Page 15 of 49 The replacement housing needs sfialf address each family, so that all are . adequately accommodated. There are several households which are presently over-housed {e.g. T.C.A.G. regulations ~.vould only allow cone-person household presently living in two bedrooms to live in a one bedroom unit) according to the tax _,. a;t ~,.t~ fns c~ia oF.~o V.n~icfnn cta nriarrlc and shnulrf it he necessary after the ccmpletion of the remodeling; some residents may be reassigned new permanent units according to the guidelines prevailing at that time. However, no resident will be required to move on site permanently without proper noticing and relocation benefits being provided to Them. b. Replacement Housing Needs All households interviewed were adequately accommodated and, none of Lhe households are presently living in overcrowded conditions. A program of forty five percent (40%) displacenreni will, in all likelihood, be' necessary for Phis project due to the income limits placed upon the site by- the State of California resulting in .families vdhose income is over sivty: percent (60%) of the median income for San 2ernardino County, ;based on family size to be permanently displaced. Upon approval of the Reloca±idn Plan the client and relocafidn consultants' will identify the enact households- which, meet this':enteria. Notices of Eligibility and Displacement vaill then 6e issued to ingse;families who do not income qualify-to. stay within the property `.''No ;resident wig be• relocated prior to certification of their incomestatus.and"no.residentwill:be required to relocate without haJing 'received ,adequate notices and referrals to comparable decent safe and'sanitaryreplacement:.housing fdr. a period of 90 days or mcre. .The study.'of.available.replacement-housing _ reflects the available units during the week: of'.Uay:1, :20rJ6_r(see Table 3 - below). Income One hundred seventy°{1!70) households-responded' to family income inquiries, during the survey".period Some households .provided' fixed monthly amounts and others; provided rnonthly'..ranges:of income to property management within the past year. Pv1ediah monthly income forall households responding was thirty five thousand:four hundred. seventy three dollars ($35 473) pegannum. :Ger~etally speaking, for an.average. household size of 7 fo 3 persdns,:lhese famrhes woyld atl fall one third. - (1/3) within the moderafe and above income category and"the:oiher twd Resolution No: RA 06-007 Page 16rof49 thirds (2/3) ~;~ithin the lo•rr and very lov/ iricome category for' San' Bernardino Gounty. - During the month of tviay and June, more accurate documentation of income ~a-as offered by residents..- To date, it vas found that the breakdovm of income per family is as follovds: Table 1. Tenant income, Pepperwood Apartments v`. i Moderate -Low & i Resident I and Above Very Low I i ~ i-X ...___-._ ~. _..__----`-1 .. ....____ X 3 I X ~ .. h_~_ _ - ~ . , 5 -- ' --- J ~_ - ~ . _. .X -- ~ -~ -- -e --- ----- ~ . a --~--- , I------ ~-------- , ~- i , G = ~- i .~ , . l.12 x Jam, ~---~ ~ ; ~.X .. I 13 '- 1~` I X~_ ~ ' x ~ X .15 . ; __ I X ~ _16 ' _ -- ; X _ _ _. 15 j _ _ 19 X ~ I ~ 20 X ~r , _ _~_ __ ?2 I X~ _ ~3 X i ' = - j ---- -g~ - ,~5 _ i X ----- - x 1 z6 ----- 7 -- , X , .._.__ - 28-- ~ . _- _ _. ~ f L J_. X 1 170 171 ..-.-.-..... 17~ 173 i74 175 176 177 181 i82 ~. 183_ 184 -- ---- 185------ 186 187 __-- 1ae 189_---- 190 -----~- 191 192 ____. 193~~ 194---- 198 199 200 20_1 202 203 204 205 200_ 207 7.08 X X X X- X: X J Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 21 of 49 Resolution No: RA 06-007 Page. 22 of 49 None (0) of the families advised `thPy'v/ere in receipt of any forms of housing assistance (e.g., HUD Section 8 Vouchers, etc.). Some of the residents did reprrt their units are rani controlled under the prior San Bernardino County P.egulatory Fagreement e. Preferred Relocation Areas iJo specific preferences ~~n~ere evidenced in survey responses, however, it is expected that most prefer to reside within the same Geographical area . in which they presently reside in Rancho Cucamonga ` Since permanent displacements are foreseen, it is expected that some of the displaced households will ~.~ish to move to other areas in order #o be closer to their employment and or relatives. But at this time, the issue of replacement housing was.not discussed in detail with the residents during the survey. f. Income Limitations for Project.Area r1 U The median income for the County of San Bernardino, family of 4 "is: presently set by the California .State Department of Housing 'and Community Development. as fifty sev~amthousand five: hundred ($57,b00), dollars per year. The residents of Repperwood Apartmehts reported their incomes as al( falling within moderate an'd°the IoN<br very flow=income status on a' one to three ratio. The residents reporting moderate and above incomes are .those persons whos,hall become the`:-'permanent displaces, should the tax credits be awarded (or tiiis property.. Relocation benefits of rental assistance shall be paid,`per URA guidelines,' for this project to all residents wlio are displaced:cJue to. their income-: status. CJ Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 23 of 49 - HUD ANNUAL INCOME LIMITATIONS - San Bernardino COUNTY (2006) Sections 50079.5 and, 50iU5 direct the State Department of Housing & Community Development (H&CD}lo publish the income limits. HUD released new income limits for this calendar year February 11, 2005. Accoraingly, Hi~Cu has filed with the Office of Administrative Law, amendments to Section 6932 of Title 25 of the California Coda of. Regulations. The amendments contain the new HUD income limits,. prepared by H&CD pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50093, promulgated April 6, 2006. ~ Table 2 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY - FAMILY i SIZE 1 I EXTREMELY. LOW INCOME VERY LOW ANNUAL INCOME LOWER _ ANNUAL INCOME ' MEDIAN ~ .'ANNUAL ~ INCOME ~ MODERATE"- ANNUAL -INCO(NE ~ ONE PERSON I . 512;100 520,150 I - 532,200 ~ ~ $40,300 548,300 ~ Two PERSON 800 523,000 { 536,n00 X46,000 ~ . 555,200:. THREE PERSON I 515.550 ~ $25,900 ~ 541,400 ~51,6DD I ' i562,1D0 FOUR~PERSON ~ 517,50 528,750 ~ ;546 000.. 557„500 ~ X69;000. FIVEPERSON $i$,650~ -531.,050 349700 ,l .562,100 $74,5Du SIX PERSOFJ 520,000 $33;350 ,;$53,350 : ~.' S66;70D $60;000 SEVEN PERSON $21,400. -S35,650• I 557, 050 ~;~ _571„300 ' ~ 585,600` Elctir PERSON 522,750 537,950 ~ $60 700 ~ .575;900 591,1D0.. Section III Study of Available Housing Should displacements take place, replacement housing shall be provided to all permanently displaced residents:: vahich :are "comparable". (Cepia(:e(IlGlit IIV UJII I'.J Jlla]II UV U CI.G~II, JGIG PIIV .741u~al y. Gv G~{uuw ~„ a,.-v to accommodate the occupants and within the financial means of the . displaced person, or persons. Referrals of immediately available residential comparable units shall be given to .residents in a bi-weekly report. The units shall be comparable with respect to the: number of rooms, habitable space, and type . and .quality of construction. ` . Comparability shall be a compromise between the present features of the dwelling, however, it shall not squire strict adherence to a detailed; item . by item comparison. The area shall not be subjected to environmental problems and shall not be' less desirable than the location of the present ' . dwelling. During the week of tvtay 1 .through 12, 2006 a survey of all available units,'-. within the area was carried, out utilizing the above descriptions, in a desire to.assess the reasonableness of causing such displacements as may ire . rlecessary to carry out the project to a positive conclusion. The survey utilized Ixal ne~,vspaper, as well as local. property management firms, and windshield analysis o8tlie area; as its resources i' Table 3 -Replacement Rousing Survey Results, ' Rent Amount ~ Address _ ____ Telephone Contact r • " Studio Apartments _ 1 r--- S900 110035 Terra Vista Parkw~ _ I (909j_989 8211_ __ 15995 110400 Arrow Route _ _. I (9099945 0588 ~. --------..._. _ - -- --1 _ __ ;One Bedroom _ ~. _ ,; SFi60 ~ 8837 North Grove Ave. __ I (909;981 8121~ _ _. 5375 __~ 8383 Fir DnbP _ _ (866 33s 3197_ 5900 0'181 Foothill Blvd 1 1909) 989 9363 5930 1 10244 Arrow Roue -- .-Y- - 1 (909.980 735-_--_ ~ X1000 8493 Ehv,anda Ave . ______ . i. (866 338:5398 __ __;_I i 5 iOtiO !-- 8990 i9`'' Street;~2G6 I{~09 946-.6701 5 r030 _ 10400 Arrow Roue -~ L09) 945 5588 i 51080 8950 A;row Route _ {8667:3'8 S~t21_ r $1100 ___ 10151 Arrow Route #1 12 909 91 G 1494 [ X1110__ _ ____~.. i 7903 Flm ALe_ _ ____ _. ' (909)980 7368_ ~:. I ~ $1115_ _~ 1'0935 Tel ra.Vista Pdrl<way _ 9J~989 8211_ ~~ Resolution No. RA 06-007 ' Page 25 of 49 $1150 111210 4`; Street _ __ ___ __ ___ , (.909)_980-1493_ _ ~', ---- - - 51185 7951 EUwanda ~~~a - (909)_463_4640 ______ _i S1185 ; 75_91 EUwanda Ave. 309 463-4640 i_-_~- -- - -- I Two Bedroom I ' L - - - - -- ;_5970 __ _____, 8837 North Grove Ave. (909) 981-8121 _______ --- - ---- I $1000 19101 roothill Blvd I 09989-9363 - --- ' f m...T.4- I ooo~ n~~.~~. v.~.,` ~,,., /110\ OR9-R~7"I i y 1 V J J .. . L U I ~-_ .. ~ .. _ .- . ~ . r---;, ; 510-.0 ~ 9181 roothill Blvd: I (909L89_9363_„__..___ $1180 18493 Etiwanda Ave. I:, (86638-5396 __ ~ 1 i $1_00_ _8167.Vinevard Ave. _ __ (909)981-1431~~X263 ~ 51210 8950 Arrow Route _,__- (866) 338-5421. 51260 10935 Terra Vista Parkway _ (909 989-8211 ---..__..._ ..............--..-____-_._.__.., 1___~...---...- -----___-_._ 51275 i 10151 Arrow Route t#70 ~ (909) 981-4131 I 51290 _ -._ _._ 11343 Mountain View Drive _ 909 941-0408 -~~---------___-- --I 51300 87~iollwood-Drive ___ ____-___(909) 981-4131 #229 - -- -- I $1300 8493 Etlwanda Ave. _ _ __ ___i (866):338 5396 --- - --- S1310 __ 8493 Elnvanda Ave _____~ (866j 338 5396 ^__-__I $1330 _ j 7903 Elrn Ave ._,__._-__ I (909) 980-7368 5133fi 110400 P.rrosv Route (909,) 9qo-5588 _ __ $~ 340 ~ 8950 Arrow_R_oute , - _ ~ (866) 338-5421 51350 .._ _i 1085_0 Church Street _ ___ ~ (909 476-6800 - ---- _-i 51375 17661 Haven Avenue _ ~ 32_3 401-5980 5 i 418 ~ °200 PAillikzn AvenuA 909 980 8050 i _ i ,: ' !. There-were over forty (40) decern safe and sanitary comparable, and available units for rent within the immediaielylarea of the project during a one week period of time from fvlay 1 ao PAay 8 2006. The:'concluslori of this survey is that adequate available replacement hdusing will be available during the life.(Ruyost3, 2006 through January 1 200.7) of th.e ; referenced relocation projectin oreler to!house any necessary residehts. f~ Secfion IV Relocation Assistance Program Relocation Assistance available to residents of the property. consist of-ht~o basic parts: Relocation Counseling and Relocation Benefits'. A. P.elocation Counseling During the life of the relocation proiect, (August 3, 2006 through January 1, 2007) the following services shall be provided fo any and all residents of the project: 1. P,ecommendations on the needs and preferences of displaced persons .' 2. Current and continuing information on the availability, prices (both :': . sales and rental), of comparable replacement dwellings, as well as suitable locations. 3. Written notices of all necessary, and legally mandated notices and letters, shall be provided in any necessary language for residents to be'. able to understand clearly their rights and appropriate laws regarding:',;: . the relocation process under the Federal Uniform Relocation and Lant1' Acquisition Policies Act of. 1970, as araiended, and HUD's Tenant: Assistance, Relocation and Peal Property Acquisition changes 1-4 Examples of applicable:':iNotices and 'letters for.ahis project are .as fOIOWS: ~ ~ ~~ a. C,eneral lnformaiion Notice b. P.elocation Ehgibility'N_ oLce c. 90-Day Notice d. Referrals 3o Gdmparable Replacement Dwelling Unlts e. HUD Information Brochures : 4. Advisory services shall:be available'to all residents In orderto minimize: `: hardships to those persons: These services..shall be ,provided `by :: professional relocation. consultants,: provided for`ithe.<residents by the LINCHousing, at-no charge to the residents 5. Information will be.supplied;regarding o{h'er federal and'sta{e programs Which may be of assistance`fo those persons m,applying for assistance :.._ under the program:. 6. Residents shall be informed as:'to the availability cif relocation benefits ,. and assistance and`the eligibility requiroments:therefore, as'well as the procedures fornbtaining-such benefits aid assistance - - 7. L=ach efigibte, displaced person shall be`.assisted"ih the completion of application for paymant and tienents. - Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 27 of 49 B. Relocation Benefits All relocation benefits shalt be provided to residents under the Guidelines set forth by the Federal Uniform Relocation and Land Acquisition Policies Act of 1979, as amended, and HUD`s TenanLAssistance, Relocation and Real Property a.-,...;,~1;;..., ~h onnoo 1_.4 .,ill ho nairi in thncF !iicn!arori hv.thra nrlli P. CfS ACfiV ifiRS These benefits shall consist of, but not be limited' to', the above referenced relxation counseling activities and relocation benefits of the following type ACTUAL REASONABLE h4OVRJG EXPENSES AND ALTERNATE. PAYPAENTS. All residents shall be compensated for the actual reasonable exper~ses incurred : in moving himself or herself, or his or her family, or his or her family's personal propeaY. Professional movers shall be provided through the relocation consultarits, to . assist residents in packing, cratirig, unpacking and uncrating of personal:.'.. property. Residents also shall be eligible fur reimbursement payments .for such reasonable expenses as deposits for etility transfers, utility transfer charges; telephone transfer fees and deposits, credit report charges during the application process fnr .replacement housing and other reasonable: expenses as should so arise, such as storage of personal,.preperfy. Should the resident not desire -the 'tree d them ..professional .move,::an appropriate fixed moving. payment shall:-be offered to`.the r~sidei~f; per FiUD Guidelines, based upon .their present -7ous!ng, Currently this::::ranges cfrorn .9995.00 for a studio apartmenE'to $1,418;00 fora 2-b'edroom.untt When the reconstruction of the project is €omplete; there may be a need for.ori- site re-housing of residents based`tipon theirneed=underihe Tax;Credit program. All on site rnoves will be considered: a .part. of"#tie Actual :Reasonable: Moving Expenses eligibility program until this-project program is complete :After tYiat :. , time, any on site moves shall;be at the resident's:choicecnd expense; only. Tahle d.. Resident'Unit Size, Peppenvood Apartments Unit Size- ! Re-housing Needs l ~ Number of I ^ - 'I. A-02 ~ - ------~---------------- ~ _..._. __ ~ A ~9 1 ~ Vacant „-~C - i i 1 i - - - --- -- ---- ----- A-1~ - 1 - I--- --- ~F-13 ~-------- -~-- -----I -------( -- --- P.-14 ~ 1 ' - ~A ~ 5 ' ~ ~ ----~ ---- ---- -~. -- __ - - A-10 ------ - ~ - ' . ---~ - ----~ .-------- ~ ,- - _ _~ A 12 i 1 - 1 - .__~-- ---- A 1:i ----- _ 2 2 r -_ __-- 2 I A-21 ~ ... A 22 __ _ A 23 1 _ I 1 ~ __ A-24 ~ 1 ' Vacant i _- _ 25 A- = ~ ` ~ - --- - ~ ..-- - - _ -- _ _-- ~- - - - P A-27 - - 1 - i 1 __.__ ~ j A =c3 - ' 1 - ~ ----. _ -._Vacant-------: - - - ------ - A 29 ---.1 _..-- -- ~ . - ----~--- ~ ---._._~ 1 _~-__ . _._._- ~ r30 l 1 1 ~ A-'1 -~-- ~-_ _ ~ -- T-- ` - _ - -- 1 - A-32 1 - 1 i - - l _ A-A3 I _..----- 1 -- - - -J 1 - A ,4 1 - 1 <: I A ~--- I __._ _ ~-._ . ___- __ ---.~~: 1 -. . A-.~U ~ 1 1 L __ _- A-37 _ _ ~ 1 -~ -- - 1 -~ I . _..__._I A 3~ 1 I _ 1 ..: ` : ~ _ A-39-- -i _._ 2 - _~ ~ ~- : Model A-40 -i .__._ 2-- ----- ~ -.- 2 I E-02 2 i 1 ; - 8-03 i __--- _ ~- _ - _ . ... 1 -- _.: 8`04 ' 1 - 1 I ~- -- t3 05 ~ 1 1 1 ~` ~ _ __ .B-06 -. -J1_. - _ 1 ---- - - -- _.._ , _ -B-oa -- ~ -- - ~ L- 1 -~ i ~ J Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 29 of 49 11 &14 Bi 55 B-16 B-17 B-1.8 1 B-24 5 L5____..,.. -6 2E _ 6-27 _B 31 B-QL 1 C-OS C-06 C-10 C-1 1 C-12 G-14 C-1:5 C-16 G-47 C-18 G-1~J 1 1 1-. 1 1 1 2 Z z.. 2_. 2 -~ - ~_ 1 ,. _ 1 1 1_ 1 i- -.. 1_ 1 2 2 2 2' _, . 1 1 __ 1 1 1 1 1 1~ 1 2 i --~ --- 2 ' -------- --i . --~ i - ~ -_._. -... _ ____.. 1. _---- i ---~ ----- - -- Vacant I ~ 1 1 `. ---1-- ~_ 1 i .. _--- -~ ~ 1 ,: _: -:_ --- ~ 1 - - - -- - --~~ . __- . _- _f _ -_ . __ Z _j-- Z `~; ' - " ~ _ . i' - 2 i ~ 1 ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~:. 1 - , 1 __ _ 1. -- - - 1 J te . _ l _ - _..- 1 1 1. ~;-- - ---2 _ - : Z ~.. . _~) w. 1 j ; C-21 -----___ C-23 C-24 C-25 _...__- 1.-LO __C-2 ~ . -.____- C-3i C-32 D-01 D-02 D-07 D_-10 C~1 1 D-12 D-13 D-18 D-19 D-20 D-21 D-22 __...... C-23 _D-24 D-25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 _._'.. __-...1_ -_.~.. 1 1 b ___ 1 1 - 2 _ 2 _.,. z -z __ 1 _- _~_ 1 .. .............. . Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 31 oi49 i E-07 E-10 ~-1~. E-12 C_.^.' E-1u E-15 E-16 _E-17 E-18 E-19 E-20 E-21 E-22 E-26 E-c 7 E-28 E-31 E-32 E-33 E-34 E-35 E-36 .E_~7 E-38 E-39 E-41 E-42 F-01 F-02 F-03 F-G4 F-05 F-06 F-07 F-08 F-09 F-10 ~-r _ ~' F-12 F_13 f-14 F-15 I F_~I R F-17 -F-~8 F-19 F-24 G-01 ~._.~.1 G-45 ___._.. G-06 G-07 _G_-1 1 G-12 G_13 G-14 G-15 G-16 G-19 G-'LO G_-21 G_-22 G-23 G-24 G-25 1 _ -~.._ Studio Studio Studio Studio Studio 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 Y 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 ---2 - -- ~ -- -~- Studio Studio - --.' --- - --- St u d i o `---._._._.----rr Model Apartment - 2 --- Z 1 ~ ~ ;...: 1 ? -;~ - 1 _ -. ------ - _ 1 2 2 2 2 2. P,EPLACEMENT HOUSING PAYMENT nu__, i loin u... ~.- F. -, r, r7 f"..~i6 ~.•nl from !hn Ctnto of Tiro ~..ucu u., ~ ~~, ....~'l.^y, ~,..., ..-........_ .... .... '.a °ppr ... _... ..._ _._._ _. California Tax Credit Program and has received funds from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Asa result, residents will be relocated under the' previsions of the Federal Housing and Urban Development DepartmenPs Tenant Assistance', Relocation and Real Prop=rty Acquisition Handbook 1378, Changes 1-4, commonly known as URA guidelines. No residents are expected to'be temporarily moved on-site during the period of'.. _ remodeling and reconstruction of the project The Scu(~e of Work for the project '; will allow all residents to continue tenancy unimpaired during construe(ion. A 45°~ permanent displacement is projected; which would amount to.. approximately ninety nine (99)'permaneni relocations, should income projections' be correct. A displaced personas defined 5y appropriate Federal Regulations qualifies fora' payment under the Replacemerc Housing,, Payment portion of the law, and ,will redeive a Rental Assistance Payment calculated.;as follows ;. 42 months"times the amount obtained by subtractiric a. the lesser of 30% of the- persdn's.averaga monthly,yress;iricome and tfie current rent plus utilities atthe residents present housing ... .. .FROM , b. the lesser of the monthly rest of rent and-estimated monthly utility costs at a comparable replacerne~t dwelling and,. the rnonihly cost' of renfi and estimated average ,monthly- utility costs (oc,.;a decent; .safe and sanitary.: comparable .replacement dsi~elling to' whicn the `;resident household:... - r ,. . actually relocated: .. Should the resident v~~ish tp. purchase replacement housing a :down payment assistance payment equafCO the RenlatAssistande PayrrmenCS`iallibe provided. :: . Under the law, a residehi in oecup2nry fdf less than 90 days is not entitled tb-a replacement lieusing payment.(Rerital Assistance Payment)`in ahe same manner . as a 90 Day plus occupant ., However, to comply wdh the.,:L'ast Resort Housing` Regulation, .action may be taken as neeessar"y or approjriate to: provide the resident of less than 90 Days'funding of re!ocation:paymenfs as detehnined.6y LINC Housing:' in a supplemeriiab=paymentr;plan - Last Resor Housing is defined within the Uniform Relocation A:ct and authorizes payments to be made uporn the just need for such, in the. case of both 90-Day cr less and 90-Day or plus residents. Disbursement of all relocation payments shall be made in a timely manner, and at the discretion of the displaced person and the displacing Agency or fine. All claims and relocation assistance payment shall he submitted v/ithin eighteen (18) months of vacating the property and premises. Payments shall. not be made, hoveever, prior to the completion by relocation consultants of a replacement housing inspection. Proof cf payments having been received by residents shall be kept..alona with an individual file for each resident which includes, but is not limited to, the following information: a. demographic information b, household make up, including 'sex, age and disposition cf each' resident c. referrals to comparable replacement housing d. copies of all hJotices and correspondence e. a daily log of all relocation consultant/resident contacts f. all appropriate final and authorized:ciaim forms.. . g. all appropriate billing from and payments made to professional movers h. proof of resident receipt of informationalbrxhures i. prodf of resident receipt of'relocatian benefit hinds j, 'housing,inspection form k. verification ofresidenf;residencyand eligibility ' I, verification of resident .income, .present rent, repiacenient houstng",. .. rental address, and monthly rent amount'.;% m. Proof of resident reimbursement for additional adtual moving expenses n. And, should resident purchase repiaeemenfhousing, copies of escrow instructions, certified °escrow statement; and: any cost paid: outside:. escrow as weil..as any. other; pertinent documents teegarding the,:. purchase bfreplacement:tiousing C. P.ELOCATIOPI P~LIGIES:and BUDGET The relocation consciltant will .provide relocation plan .implementation and' advisory services to the displaced hpuseholds. The relocation=consiiltanis-will be available to meet with the resjdents.du~ing normal busyness hours, .after working: hours and.on weekends. They.cari.6e reached by, residentsahrough their toll fcee_.:. telephone number, as ~uell~ 2s"through inifiwduai: cell phones; 24 hour§_ per .da.y There is a site o#ice within the apartrnenPburid{ng witn posked hours of service'. Resolution No. RA 06-007 - Page 35 of 49 - during the relocation process: for tenants to pri~tai2ly meet-with the relocation consultants. The relocation consultants will be' responsible fo( preparing claim forms, ~•ihile LINO Housing will hava the ultimate- authority to. approve cr disapprove the recommendation of the' relocation consultants regarding the relocation compensation to residents. They will work with real estate experts, properly management firms, property owners, building managers and any other nuce~~;,rv n~rsnns to ensure that the needs of all residents are being rnet. The relocation consultants shall also oversee the tenant involvement in the hearing and planning stages of the process as ~roell as the implementation of relocation policies and procedures. - It is expected that the payment cf all necessary relocation benefits, as well as the administrative costs of the relocation consultants, shall be. paid in part or wholly by LINC Housing from available- funds a!Iocated for the project with the adoption of this Relocation Pian. The rotal estimated budget for relocation assistance payments of benefits- and administrative cost for rile project relocation is: 5800,000 t~~9ht Hundred Thousand Dollars] LINC Housing and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency do. in the preparation of the reloraiiom.plan, hereby authorizE.ihe us_e of funds; for paymerit in full for these relocation services ar~d benefits.. The projected dates of disPlacement.ara governed try the cdopkion of-this Relocation Plan. However; delay rioCbeing foreseen, theproject displacemenEs are expected to take place during the third or iourth:quaRer of.the yesr,2006. , The project construction completion is expected'.to:occurderng the,firsi :,uarter of 2007. D. APPEALS POLICY The appeals policy will foilov/the: standards described m Section 6150 =t sca. of` the Guidelines. Briefly stated, fhe displaced househbid will have the rijhf.io'ask for review when there is a complaihfregarding any of its nghtsfo relocation and . relocation assistance, such as a determinalicri as to..ei~gibiliy, the ariiount of paymer7t, or the failure to provide a comparable replacemenYhousrngceferraL, A copy of the established appeals policy and procedures is attached as:'Exhibit"'A". General Information __, h... ,.;,,._..L, In@ pro pony In `NnlCll yUU ill/vv ICJiVe ij bC:il~g l.Vi_/v e~~C:U ~~~ v ~,'.. ~.~w ,,,~.....~...~. (affordable) housing. As the project schedule proceeds it will be necessary for any resident whose income is above. sixty percent (60°!) of the median county , income. to permanently relocate. You will be notified if you must :Hove. Please read this information brochure, as it explains your eligibility and the... amount of your relocation benefits under the federal andlor state law. Please save this brochure for reference. Pearce Consulting, Inc. has been retained to assist you with your .relocation . needs, should you reed to move. They can be reached at {562) 598-0968 bete/een 9:00 a.m. and 5:G0 p.m. Monday through Friday. Additionally, a site . office has been opened at unit #A-5 wish a local telephone number of (909j 476- 5974. Spanish speaking consultants are available. Si recesita esta informaciorr en espaiiol. pro favor Ilame a su consultant.. PLEASE DO NOT MOVE PREMATURELY.. THI$ IS NOT A NOTfCE. TO . VACATE YOUR DWELLING. This is a general ihformaliUnal`prochure only, and. is not intended to give a detailed description of either the lavi,. oc, regulatibns pertaining to relocation assistance: .However, in yi°neral;you v/rll.t~e:el,gible for. the following: Assistance In Locating Replademe~t Hor,siog.: PCI vnll assist you in locating a l comparable replacement dv/elling by providing ,referrals o appropriate :and. available housing units. You. are ehc~uraged io aetivelysaEl..housing: yo~irself: When you have found a unit; ybur reldcatibn consultant' will carry otii art inspection, and. advisa you as td whether the dv~elUng uni( meets decent, 'safe'. and sanitary housing requiremehfsr' - h~loving Benefiits:= If you move'-as a •result of a Displaceriient Notice you will receive a payment fo assisf.you in .moving your ipersbnal =prdperty:..F~ Fixed. P,.lovdtg Payrnenf is hased upon the number of moms youibccupy at+peppenNOOd Apartments (of 51;000 or 51:;175} and you v/ill bei:responsit~Ie for.arranging;for your own move and the owner l^iill'assunae:no liability for arty loss or'damag~ of your personal praperty: if'ydu v/ish to enonoe the services of a>profession~l mover and gave the landlord.througYi.PCI pay the,bill, you_may claim the Ac(ual fvlovinq Payn~ertt for up io SU'tniles....Your reloca#0n consultant v/ill (arrange ,for. the movers and inform you of any addifionet utility-ren~~hrirsement~ for:whi^hyouu: Height be eligible. Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 38 of 49 P.eplacement Housing P~nent: If youttualify and wish to renFycur replacement dwelling, your rental assistance benefits will be based upon the difference over a forty-tv:c month period bebr.~een .the rent you must pay. for a comparable replacement unit and the lesser of your current rent or thirty percent (30%} of your gross monthly household income. You will be required to provide' your relocation consultant v,rith monthly rent, and household- income verification prior fn the rhtarminatinn of vour eGaibility for this bavment. If you aualifV. and wish to purchase a home as a replacement dwelling you can applyup to the totatamoun4 of your rental assistance payment toward the down payment and non-recurring incidental expenses of escrow costs: You relocation consultant will clarify procedures necessary to apply for this payment. To eualify for a Replacement Housing Payment, you.'must rent or purchase and occupy a comparable replacement unit within one-year from the later of the date you n'~cve from the Pepperwood Apartments' or, the date comparable replacement dwellings were referred to you. .All claims for relocation benefits must be filed with PCI ~.vithin eighteen (18) months from the date on-which you move from Peppenvood Apartments: YOU MUST CONTINUE TO PAY YOUR RENT. Failure by a tenant to pay rent. or material breach of the rental agreement, or performance by tenant of a'. dangerous and/or illegal action, or refusal by the tenant to accept one of a: reasonable number of offers of replacement housing, may all cause eviction: Eviction will threaten the residents eligibility for. relocation-:benefits. ,: Any person aggrieved by. a c;etermination as Yo elig bilify'fo~ a relocatiori. payment, or the amount of a payrnenf; may have the .Gairrireviewed: or reconsidered in accordance with 'the :appeaf ;procedures; of .Peppecwood Apartments. Details en appeal procedures are available upori request from the' relocation consultants. Relocation benefit paymentsar> not considered as income for the purpose of ttie Internal Revenue Code of. 1986 or the Personal Iricome Tax-Law; Part 10;' (commencing with Section T7001),:of Division 'L.:of the Revenue;,and Taxation'. Code, orihe Bank. and Corporation 7az law, Part ,11 {conimencmg with Sec'ion 23001) or Division 2 of theRevenue and Taxation Code Pearce Consulting Inc. hopes to assist you m every,vaa/ possible to'minunizE the hardships involved, should .your family heed to relocate' ' We appreciate your attention and if you have'any questions we:urge-;you-{o ielephone.or:;visit us at: your convenience. ,, Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 40 of 49 38 j 1 0 j ! Hispani^ ( ' -.- 139 i i ' -~.__.-- ~ --~-R4odef __i 14U __- 2 - ! ~ ;- -- - - - ~ i: - -- -~-- ---- -- Bia..k ( ~ 51160 - -._.---! 41 ~ - 1 . . -.__. G _.___._.. _.._. - i _ 1_Black 142 1 G - UJhite - $ i 150 -- ----_ .. --- i 43 1 0 -- -- -- -..L.Hispani _ -~------ ----- - -I tiff c v - ----- -' ~ ___.- - ___- _-..1 45 46 2 2 _- - 0 .0 _ _ Hispanic__ ___ White I . _ i i---- --' 1 47- -- ., ~ 1 ~ 0 ~_..---- -----I White----- I , ~ 48 1 I 0 _ j White -_ - _ ~ _ .__- r49 ii 2 __ ; 0 i - --- . V/hite __ ! :- ~ -- :5875 -- I I- - i 50 -- -- ? j ~ x - I Hispanic ~ X -- 547p _ _ __ -- 51 - ! 2 ---- ... - 0 , -- -- - f X 'd/hite -- _ i SE26 ~ 52 11 0 - _ _ ---- ;Black ~ _ _________ ____I 53 -~ --- - ~ , 54 1 I ~ p I V/hiEe I S574 ! ' 55 _ ~ 1 p X rWhite . _: _. _ ______.. .,_ 5751 .._ .. ..- '. ~ r_-. r ° - .. - --_ _- , _ __ ,..-. ~ .. . .- .. _~-- - -' z- - i y --- ------ - --- ---- - - - rsian ; --- S12p0 58 ~ 1 ! p - -- Mid-Eastern ; ----- -- ~90U -- ,. 59 ! 2 _ ! U ----- -t- i- - ;White ; S12p5 - ~:` ~ I i 63 _I i 2 _ I 1 U ~ I Vti'hit~ - i 'x995 i I ~~. ~_-- _ _ ~ ----- - _ ~ lh'hite ~ I-_ _ _ 5985 I 1 65 ~ i' I j Vacant , 60 1 _ _---I-U- __, -~--- ! Hispani., ~- _ LS8B0 - - i _ 67 j I l ~ 1 I , --- 68 ---- ~ 2 --- - . ~ 0~ _ _--- -- °-- -~--- I Hispanic-~ -- -' _ --- ' 594.0 -- i 7U ; 1 0 ----~--- - ~ White ____ , - '- I S905 _ 71- ; 2 _ i 0 ~ X :j V/hite ~ j I S629 _ 72 I? p _ _ i - - _ UJliite i i 596p _ 73 - _ ,j 2 _-- _ 2 _ __ _Black/hsian_I ~j 5'i002 r'4 _ 2 _ 0 _ _ _ Hispanic! ~ L ~S ` 1 1 1 i Black --~ -- 5564 ._ 76 - 2 1 - --___ _ - I Nisaanic; ~ -r i -.-_~ '. ~ 1 I j White ; j __ 77 1_ _ _ ~ ~ _ _~ __o, .____._-- ~--- -- r-----j ---I White ~ . _I 5995.. ~I _I _ 78 1 I 0 I I Black I 5895_ - 79_ ~ 1 _ _ 0 ~ X Where I , 5365 ~ _ - , 181 ~' 82 -=_~ _ ~ 3 ____ i_.._. 84 _ i 1 _85 _ ._.l.._t. ' ag i _x._....- _.__ - _ n 88 _ ---' 2 ' 8g _ _; 2 ' -- - 90 ..-__.I_~. '91 !2 -9~ --1 X94 1 95 2 99 1 100__ 1 1_01 _ 11 102 2 :03 2 ;~ 04-- -- 105- ~_ 106 2 ,,-~7 ~ 1 oa ! z 1- 1 G>~ 2 110 1 111_ _i 9 1i2 ~1 113 I 114. ' 1 i_15_ ~1. 1i6 _ 117' 1 718 119 ' _ 120 i 121 r2 0 0 0 0 G G 0 0 0 0 k ':X M!F~itn Hispanic-- I. ---_ ----_--~ His ariic ,i ___~ Asian j ~ Hispanic) I - I . I V/hite - - I -- --- - bVhi ~ i. i ~°50 i . i White '.. I ., 15895 I. ~ --- - I _. i Hisparn~ ._. .. . 595 , - I V1hdA , l u470 -- V/hde i " ~-- -- IS970 I - - -- - White -- -___ ;`5970 - i. _~. - __ --1 I - - -i--- --- - - --- - - - ' - - --~' . - ~ I Vacant 'i`.: _ ~ --- Whit/ i H I - s~an~c, _ f - __ ~ i- ~ White/ i i S1205 .', Hispanic - -- - _ i ~ Asian ` _`_ ~ _ __ x1_305 -- White -_ii White i - i __ i' White - ~ I Va t ~ a.,__~. _~ I _ can I G~ihite " I I _ _L White I ~ .- r . I I ~ -_ ---~ --, x- I-Black - I I wZ54 T -- _ - j ~ --- - -- I ! Vacan~ - -, ---- --5 ;. , i ~Vhite _ 51205 - - _. _ Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 42 of 49 .: 167 171 . 2 -i 7z ---;-.~... 174 -- --~ - ----_.. 175 176_ 1 177 -;~1- 178 -- 180 ! 131 ! i -_ 18_2_ _; 1 _ 183_ ~ 2 _ _134____1 185 ~ 2_ 186 ~ ___-~_ 137 2 - -- ... 1E39__i 1 189 I.1_ 198 2 191- ~--1 192_ ~ 1 1 ~3 ~ 1_ ~ 94 . _ __1 1 ~'S 1~6A ~ --- '197 ! 1 200 11 L01-! 1 "02--1- 203_ ~ 2 204 ~ 1 205 1 _ 207 ~ ~_2 208 !0 '_. '0 1 n 7 1 0 5815 5935 In/hite_ ___ i__ I White I ----- -- ! -~-------- V;~hite ; 15341. -~ --- I ~ _ --~ Vacant '-----I i _ _ __ Vacant i. ~Nhite _ ------- - i >. ~ - ~. - - ~ r Black - ~ - -- ~:. - ~- -- ~ . ,; 1 'vb"tile - - --- -- ~ --'- - -- ~ - -- i Asian - 1 I -- I Black _ I _ ! _ _ __ __. -, ~ i I Hispanic ~ - - -- 1 51200 - -- ' _~ I _ _ ~ White ! - - _ ,While ` -_ - ~ - ' --- _ -i N/h~~e -~ I _ .. I - ' ~ Hsian I I ~ ~ 7 --- Asian -- I . S860_ --i -While ~ _ I ~8D5 _'] I --- - -~ ---- -- ~_ ~ I - - B~ack _ i 5779 _ ._____ i ! - ~ Model - _..~ X ! Whhlte --- -- __ ~X: _ S1220 -.: i Black. ~ S1{14~ i _ 131ack_ -i:---- ~- - _ ~ I - I S880 ~ - _-! ~ .: Asian ! .. '?+r588p = - ;Black. - ~ ''.,'5376 - -t :: _ _ i anic His ~ i I p _ !White _ ~ ~ --- - . ~-- - = i ~ ---- i ~.- --1 .. __ ~ White I 151-:045 _ I__v ~ F{iscanic i ~ _ ~ S05G __ ~:WfiEt~ - __L$365 r Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 44 of 49 212 _--- ._.. 213._....1.. 21_4 _ ! 2 215_ 1 21.6 i, 4 217 i-..1 ~~o- - 220 --- ,_21-._._i...1 - -~..-- 222 I _ 223 1 227 228 ??g 230 2 2 i 1 ~ ~Nhite _ ~ i 5750 i Vdhite i ---- ,. ~ 0 I 1 -~-- ~ VVhrte ------ - - - -- I -- - '- , 0 __ ~ Hispanic---...... ~_ ~ '..._.-_. i ~ :, Hispanic i ~ I -,----- a ------~---~ Elack --- - --: X ?.sian ------- 0 --- I ~ White ~ ~ _ ~ __ __ 0 ~ i_ _ ' __ I Hispan_ is Ji x - 15950 _J __ D I White I ' 1 -- ~ ' Hispanic _~_~ ~ _- --~ - --- D- _ , ~PJhite ----- -- -~ --~- --- 2 _-- I ~ His anic ' ----.p__.______:._--------:.-__.__:___.____. 0 ~ .White ' _ .-..___ _-~- - --. 1. -__ -{ - - ~ - -----. ---~---' - --- I - - _. J ... 6:$'I':~PLISIiED AI'Pi:~LS POLICY S 1'ROCGDURC:S :A. ~$1f101~ Put'pusc The purpusa of thew Ciric'rance. I'.roecduras is to aucmpf u.~ resnl';e disputes 6er,~~ean tL: .. clanrrmt ~~nd the I)isplucing a~'cnr~' at nte~uneest piusroic atmuni>u:;uve Ic~'ei~tvnnc :ua,ritmg ;hc dnim:utt ::n oppnrnutity !n have a full tnul I;iir rc:'ie,e of Iris or her case: Thcrefrn'c. all relevant c~ idcnce shca:ki hi presetrtul at the lou'rsl le~rl olahesr prircaulutzs. In stay case where :uch e~•idenr could hava brcn presented at a lo~.acr Icvc1 and the cluimant. fai!d Io flu so, tiro Rc!ocatinn appeals Board rosy refer the nt[ntrr huck_to !lie lower: Ie~~cl for cnn,ideration ar.d detarntineniim prior to their considering such c~=dance. B. ~~ 11111'_1 Right of Itedic~r ~ ~ _, \ny displaced pct:,on who is not satititicd with a dararminztion as to ciigihilitc. amoitia .. i~fp:n•nurn, t:nd `allure t»' ate Di;plac~n n 'cnt}~ ut ptovulc o~nparaih)c pcianau~ tI 'tr adaqunia'~ I~z:nporan• rcpla•,cmcnt iutusing nr the Displacing :\ecnay's priipcny m:tna!,cnr~nt praaica; or no! props l: applying aipprOpiiatc regul'ttions.-at his or hor,eFeninn ma~~ ha,'e his br har claim.:. ra~'ic:ved :vul reconsidered in ac.ordance with tits fiillowinc procedur:i~. C. I`? tOl)3~ Request fur Furthu V1 t iltcn Inlormatsun ..' :A clain~taot .hal! 'Lt'sl icquast tn~'lliSy>la ina :lgcnt~'s!desi rood lepres~ntttiy~c ko prrryide hn~t '.t•ilh :, full wtittcn uxpluna.iim.of the dctcnuiii,uun aiu(<the.bttsi§ ah~~cfr,r~'w'Gieh ' cxplanmiun shall by pte,viF;cd it. the claitvant with.~n.thrcea~'«1:5 from the'date ci(tcuipt'<~I.ihe ~ request."] his regttrst must be ntadc trittiin the saint I'Ei nxtntit ~pcri~d desctibeii ~it5.~~ I OU9. '~ I ' I). ~~ 100.{ hlt Ul9nal-~)rfll.hd"Eb L'11 CIIlOn- It 1170 Clann N771 fef:l9 11L 11 (11c WI"1270 t CK planal}Un_`15.Inl0 rtlU UI 117 I ~L(l tl at C, h( UI s11L'lnil l' rC(1UC51' alt 1i14117n:d ~t "SlrmL. R7111't11C Director. All SLICfi 'rCq Ut¢iS shall 'I?l n'L ti'I I1111~ Ilnd ,qh&I1-DC accompt:r~icd by a iYEacatio^ complaint ii~rin ii: required 1iy thy'-l~isplucing :~mn~.-Claimant. shall have tha lxu~dcn of dctc'tnit~ing whcUtcr ih~ 17isplocing ~;i:nci ieduire ~suMniti:a of it complaint C<snt. Thca'equesc fa an i:iibanal.hcaritib must~bc~suliindted to the 17ireewi within +:}te ~~ . Saln4 I ~ illOndl pet'IQd CIc%Cnt9Cd ln'y '1'.(}09. ~. Within fi'tier^ (.I S9°days fmt>,.t}iedatc of recetpf ,ifclnnnan~ s-~irn ten rrque~l ntcliuiiitg,a ri^IncaYian complaint f<~rtn; olaitp;tni Shull: be afiordcdi:"atn inhj~orlunit,' Ict. m.tkc uh cori37 presentation ro fhc'Director to enablr tha claimant tgidiscuss the: claim wiih:;tha hv'ectnr: `I'iir. cltim£ntt may be rcprrsented-by an a(tC~tncy i>r other person of hi~.~or lter~chebsing at ('hc a7a? .hearing {at the coal of Elie clatmtuit')_ ' ~ ~ ~ - ~ - 9'1te Direcior shall prehEtreasunrniaty of ilrc matters~dtsussell~snd.det~ismnvitnis~maila during Fite intnznai c>r:tJ he.irine, place a cop},. of (hc sutiiiii~tty i!: clatmantsGle. nndaen•i;:.a: copy thercitl'upon the claiman6:: At airy time within the pcriuti di~scrihcd in ~ IOD9 a claintturt ntav Lile a written re<~uest lur itrmal rt:ric'w am rcrnr.•sieicratien. T-he claimant m:~y inclucic in the rcuucsr. for review any. sCUCmcnt ref Ftcl 'milliin the clairnant's know)<:dge or belieCorotl.tcr mnlerial which n;ay have a bearing un the apitcal- If the claimant requests more tints to salter and prcparo additional •.1 ~, I,.-~ri:~n r rrvir•ir~ vn,l ,Irmnnerrafrc a. n•a.r,nalil r+hncic iherrlitr Ihr. r.lann:r nt'e rcyucst shrill he granted. I'. ~ti I IIOb~ Formal Rcvie~ty and Rccousidcratimt b~~ I?isptacing agency pirector i. the Direct[» of the Displacing A~±eiicy shall consider the roquezt fi,r ~~ rcvicty and :hall dcci;de u-bather a nutdiiication of the initial ticrern?inatiuns necessary. I'he Director shalt have the authority to revi<c the iniiial detcrnination or the determination of a previous ~ oral - presentation. l hr Director ,hall consider every oggrie~•cd ltcrson's com;tii.tut rr;_ardlcss of fonu, and shall if necessary provide assistanec to the elainrtnt in prerar'ing the written claim. \\'hen n claimant seeks rvie•.v, fire Director shall inform clainuurt he or she has the right to he represented '~. b~: an attorney, to prc~cnt hi, or her case by oral nr documenLtr~~ widettce. ~~ _ 1o submh rebuttal evidence, and to rnntluct sorb cross-c~:amination: rs'.. •, may Fte r~xiuirod, to. a hull and a ~e dtscloswe u1 I ~lu,_ and !o ,cck luchciol renew onie claim utt has eih t.tti~cd aciministtativc tpncal. 3. The Dit~~ctor shall review ;utd amsitici thu tui'titl leiconut,ltion crC the. claint:nt's rase in li~~ht of.. a. aal nt.nerial upon nlii~li Elie Di~pl i~ing,hz_utcybasul ns ixi'ginal dctcnttinatirnt ineliidina a!l aplih~.blcruic ,nul 'egtd ihtttia ~csc~,pY that-no cvii3encc ,hall he ixlrcd ulxtn ~h tc ^ tlai; tart has.:been imprnperly.,driied an oltpoigurnt to i~ciituovcrt he ctirlence.'or. uuu examiiie,ihcwifi tis. ~ ~ . b. the rc<t>ons. civcn by ~lic. c!a n ^n r'ur recjucsiir., is icw and rccousidcration.ol'his of hci claim a Any additional tt•nffeat m icltivant dociiliicnt tty,~~tnattiial suGtuitt~d . la.'theclaiim~ti. - ~ ~- d- ,--'vey~fun:h¢c~-iit[ounatton which the Dilicuot may!, to lt5_-~2tr:~her chscreucm,. oitlain hy: rcgnest,;inv~sugation or research, to„,insure fair and 1n11 i'evievr ctf the. claitii- .' - .._ The: dei~crntinatic+tt oi? review b4° tftc Dii ccl~ir~shall incl iiil~, but i:S. not limited .o:, a. `fhe Directors decision, nn recbntiuleratioii ofthe claim .. ,Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page 47 of.49 b. The tactual iuxi Icgab f;tiis upon ~~•hich ihe. dccisirnt is Uascd; includin!!, an,v pertinent espl:inntion ur ratinnile.. c. :1 s'tntement of rJaimzntt's riJu to seek iiniher rc•=ie:a of fiis ur her claim by Ule R.elucation :4pprtls Board and an e~phtnation I~tf the steps the daim;nu muse nd:e to ohnlin This real%~I'. The I.)ircc[or :hall issue his or her detcnninolion of rc-aica~ as iUim :is passible but nn Juror than luny-live ('!~1 dais hrnn recaipt of the htst m::tcrt.tl submitted for enr.sidcaat~c,n by the cietimnnt nr rile dale o the hearing-. whiei[c~~ci' is lacer. . ht rtse nl complaints disnisscd lilr untinuiiness or for an~+ other resnn not hosed o^ ;hc merits pf the claim. Ilte Director shall Cwitish a written'itale;nenf~to dairmm~ stating the reastni ktt the dismissal of the claim as soon as pnssiblc'bui not laicr thou litiacn (1 ?j da~~s tinm recclpr of d'te last material submitted b~~ the cleimant or nc~ date nfthe hearin" whiche'.•cr is Etter. ~ ' G. ~~ IlIU7~ Appc:ds (3u:u-d Revic~r ~ - If thcclainvtnt icels that the:Dircctor's.dctcnninatioti following file informal r,rtl itcaring. '_ . or written revic~ti' by the Uirec;or is incorrect or inatJcquate, Ire ur sl~;e tn:ty re[ldest a tin'mal ~ _ , hcarina h fr+rr a kel +ullii,n :lppraL Bom-d. - .:__. .: ~.: ~~ '...... f+ nht;tin a i~umtl hcuu.~g hctitr~ a R~locatto;i :Appca}i Board the Iunasutt nu;si reque,t in'w;;;;n~ that fl;c D;nt+rn :~chululc such t haa.;r.e Such rcquc,si ,hall b~ made ~s~uht.l .n~ peru~d dc:;cribzd in y<' 1001. ]. Niifiiu Iifieen.~~l~j~da~'s fi-oni the d:uc nY.rcCeipt of claimant`s-n:riten raluzct, .he c,r she`s ill. he noii'iied; i,f the ;Piano tl he;uing da;e. C. the e laiirtmi aeuuesfs additional timcYC? prcpauc iiriieri:il i~x urnstdc; ainit ar}d . shows cued cause therel-or,ihr huu;li da;e'shall haconGaii+;d w a~Yofkier' 3. li;e Rolocaiion AppcaliBoa,d hhll!'ha~t the authottt~ tti] bill +he'pribr dclcrminatiiln of~the Director 3. Ghe R~locatinn \ppcals Bn~rd h tlh a, the tirpr. it ~ivcs no~tce oi' Cnc fo:anal h 'i,m~, date, notify ihu deti'mant tha('f~re~o; she liar the rieht4o~~bc rcprescnted bar an atti,rney or others-af nis ofthei o«r,-cz~~cmc, toyneseru . hisorh+rrcascbycn-;ilor~docununfacy~c~alcrieoClh tt~sitLti+~,ututit.ii;nl:or documentary e~tidcnce; the runt to suG ntt icFirn~tl ~c ~iderlc~ to ~eoniiitct such.crosscxeminauun~:~ts tii rv b tulii~itcd for a-lull and.ititc c t, h>stiro of :Cacti; trod the right.t~-seek puhca+l::re~trs~ ctiice claunatt hnti exhaustet3: adminisuati~e.2ppctl. .. " ~` 4. 'f'he Redoeatio'n Appeals Board chall•re~tctiti the iinual,udteiirun;non t3rhe• di~tet.7uinatinn.ii~adu:afan. infannalaiaarin~ taking tnto~~coiisidetatiou'all n~.deriaC upon-which the challenged-detennutitigti }v2i n3ide,-all appHcabl~ rules-and regul'ahom ?hu,~~ct,~sons +ri~en by fltc cl£nmmu fuv~ Resolution No. RA 0&-007 Page 48 of 49 - .tyuCStiug rceie«':~ any odditinnal role'+'unt evidence. oral ~ur-docun~cntary, submitted icy either the tlnimant or the DisplacinC :~gency~ s re, rc5ent.^,ri°cs- A'o ~;idcncc may be rcli'cd~ upon bt• the I:clocarion Ahpcal; Birnrd when rice claimant has been impronerl}~ denied an opportunity to ruhut~e~~idcnce ar cross-examine a'.vitness. _ >. "I`hc lick>cation Anoeais 13oa;~l sL•all make its recwnmcndatiou ~~+ithin six weeks ii'on'i fhc date on which the formal hcarine is concluded i,r the date oFreci:pt ofthc last material suhminal, ~rhichevcr is later. . b. I itc Relocation :1ppeals 13n:u'd's rei'cunnunda~tion shall he made in writing and shaft coau,iti is recnnunerniation, the: litctual and leeal htsis upon afiich the reannmeneLuiun is [nude a;td a s'tutemeni infomiinc the claimant ofhis' or her eight to seek,judicial ra~'iew. 7. Tlm elaimant and the DisplacLt~ Agency's governing boily >hall bc.. promptly screed with a copy of the ~ Relocation :1ppi;als Ro:u'd's reamnnrnciation- FI. ~ti 1008) Dctcrmimrtion hp City Council?Agencc ISoarrl hhon rc~'icn'ing thr ;cuitnmer.<latidn c?L the Rdncctinn :lppcals t3oard, the Dircctcn' sl::ill. ~~ ~ _ i~fcr the ~~commend:Non to the Gtty CounuV:A_en4y Board :t us~next tct,utar m~~ m anil the Cuv Cow+ui Aency Bnaril shill (hcrctnem ftx a tune lift eunvdcrin_ On matter wl7icii :ime sl,~all be nett less tl:,an thirty' (30) d;n's~ii'o:di llii-lime the~reamun~ndacic,n ts,deiivercd to thtlCitY - C:ouncil ~~_e:~~y 13oardby the llratcrh - Un thin date Uius Pisctl etra~t'the.dai~ to whrch:alie-inlf~~r tiliailhaee hecn umtimt~i;, thc~ City CnuncilL~~ean,y Birard sh^11:prncccd'io consider the recornmcndvu~n nt'tlic ReleicaUon ,: Ap;pc:ils 13:tsrd and shall nrikcund.cntit~irn-itshnmutcsits•(inal rl~(en.~utauon:~thctein,'iti~h,clS may coniii7n, mnd~fy; or ;et stile thelnxhns'c+f the.(teluc ~,ons.lppc iisi:Ru3id 17ieiC_'iiy; . C:ouncil!A<<ency Board's detunnnatiitn in the-matter slin~l be ~~,t~nal :met ~~cOt clu,imc "fhe`~ Displttcirtg Agency' shall pnwidc, a written detennin t[ion io-G~e claimant.. 1 he clainrutt shill ire deemed to aave.cxhtlus cd.iris-lirr a+imiitisu tmvrciuedii•s uj~on the "' ''` Dill>lacitt~ lgzncy taking ucpcrn upoti~,tii'si3ter~alih~,tl +tr flii tailw'e-ui tl e~eh,:in~ni'[ tc,_ timufy lrarsue its t'i luslteraundcr. ' 1. J,y lOq))` `Dine Limits .4 claimant ilcslrii~e either utt.itifnrmtl orril 1 r~s~niatinn of secku+~ a f'oan it re;vtc~+~ ;uul reconsideration, includin~soektng L1ic~~ cvteH~ n1<tne Reltic;nuon .~'ppc !, E3i,;trd, sh.rIl<inake,,a request within. eighteen (1$1 tno~tth;::{tilh,winb Clic 1 tLCr-i7~i) thc.'da;a he%shc' spot c:, fr'oin tliu~ prahe;ip or (ii).the elate hc?sh~ rei.u~=~s i9n:d eunip~ruatiatl:fpr dtc:prirpcrly. "Chc-Ducctori9iav.~ but is not requircd.ta; c~;i~ctdd any af~llie tune Gnvts spcc,ifie<i m tnis~Autcle upon a sho~i`in ~l~ gaod cause. Any refu,al to wasvt,.ii atiuc ~lit~iit mny -be':r~cteseii;,` n nccoi~Qzuico~ auith die' - prcrcedures set Forts in scctu;ns le)03 :inz1 Ia)t)7 ahoti e e~capf)that stich,iui tttcn regirt.tt poi rirv7Uw _ - t Resolution No. RA 06-007 Page A9 of 49 shall be filed ~,cithm ninct{' (9Ct) da:.s nF claim mr s rcraipf ~qf the Utspl;iuri ~ .acency's dotcrn;imation. I. i~ 107pi Revierc.if Files R}~ Claim:urt f..he c!ainrm! may iitspct ^II iilcs ana rcror;ls brarine upon his rir hrr claim or rile osccutieVt of the claimant's ~riiv:mc~c- c~cant to the carrot the conndcnualit.~ of the nuttciia ,nt;eht or the disclosure n:rrcof i; protect eti or proitibiteci ii :' i:ra. K. (y IIII l~ fif(cc[ of Dcrermination Dcternrin:uiris m:Kle by the. Di>placing -1~'ency reganlin;,~ ^cyutsitiun and reloctuion policies snci procedure;; shall he applicable to all c;tgible persons in similar :;iuiation; rc ~ardles~ of~chetiu~ any suchsli Bible person seekti a review. Al! written detennu ition >i~ttll be tiled in• the r2rorci: of the Displa::ir._ :\ecncv and avaiial-~le iiu public inspection. L. (fi Illl.'_I. I2i;;tii lu Cuunscl t1m• clttnmant has tine right n, ba represented hyan,trttc,rney at his ur her etpcns~c at ariy - nnd all sm~ae;fi of fhc proceedings scr (orih in.lfiis Atiicle. _ .:: ~1. (§ 707:?j Further 12etivec4 >~ Li'thuDisplacutg Agencti ais spt:forih m § ~)f1US eiuni~is the ~l ~ibiL ~ of ~a daun mt }or a p•i~-ment, or disappiovts thu titll amount clamed; of rettm~s'to uI t,~aer tnc c)arm on rt; tmnts bacnuse of untimely Tiling, tic any i~thet' gmurSel, thc"Dis7i7nc,tr _ Acncy's;tiotrlrwtiUn ao ~~d~, claintnni of its determination sliall ini6rm=ihc olaimant.:of,its frai~ons tnereivr stnd shall ilso . inform. the claimant of the app'licdlilc pracedutes for;:nhl~iningJ further.` re~ierv «f' this' determination. V. (_§ 1.014) JitinCt:umphiiitmtty ~:.~ ~4'here more Phan. one p~ rsomis:il~grieyctl by the ~ftiilurr of the l~itipl tcing A~ nuti•iorcfer them us comptn;tble permanent ~r adequate temporary nplaccine~it, Eiou< na; ~tiie~ cornTriai~~ii~;ts may join in 1il,ing a Single o~r-itrearregvcst fa:r'revicW;`9 dr;te;nmin:itiuit tihulLbc rnwrle as"]teti,in provided for each of the complainants.- O. ~§ SOI.i~ :Judicia172cvierc ~othr ; ; irrthis sacticm shall in anyway preca~daar.linut a claim m, trimi.sc~l.in~~judical revi•~~~' of a claim upon czh:uistinn~of~such rcJminisnrir~c~rcinct7res~ us ,tre ti~nilab)c ut c~~i~~Giese- P~ules and Rcc~lations . D W N ~, '1 1' August . , ?006 Johnny Crawford & Maquita Stovall 902 Foothill Bh~d. #E42 n Rancho Cucamonga, CA 7 i ~ ~~ Dear Mr. Crawford & Ms. Stovall ne essary foPyon to ~aocate the preni sest loc ted ata9025 Foothill1Bldvdt~#E34vilt be Notice is hereby given that LINC-Pepperwood Housing Investors L.P. elects to terminate your tenancy in ninety (90) days beginning August 3, 2006 and ending October 31, 2006e~nd ua occupy eon or quit and deliver up possession of the p p ty y before October 31, 2006. If you do not vacate the premises by that date, the LINC -Pepperwood Housing Investors L.P. will initiate legal proceedings to recover possession of the premises, along with rents and damages. During this 90 Day period, Pearce Consulting, Ina will be available to provide assistance with referrals to replacement sites, coordination with movers and other vendors, the processing of relocation benefit claim forms, and other tasks to help facilitate your relocation. Please call Nilsa Arreola and/or Valerie Fierro of Pearce Conou lhave Iany Their telephone numbers are (909) 476-5974 or (562) 598-6968 if y questions regarding this notice or the relocation process. Sincerel}', Beverly S. Pearce President Pearce Consulting, Inc. att: referrals --i n w ~` ~~ _--- pE CE CONSULTING, INC. 347 1 Oth Street, p.0. Box 56, Seal Beach (5621 598-6968 • (562) 598-6998 CA 90740 NO"LICE OF I~iSPLACEMEii'T ANll ELIGIBILITY FOR RELOCA"CLON ASS[STANCE PEPPERWOOD AI'ARTP~IEN'I 1tESIDEN'C[AL Tr~.R`ANTS RANCHO CUCP.MONGA, CALIFORNIA August 3; 2006 Johmry Crawford & Maquita Stovall 9025 Foothill Blvd. #E42 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 - Dear Mr. Crawford & Ms..Stovall: On May 1, 2006 L INC-Peppervvood Housing Investors L. P., acquired the property you curreutl-y occupy to make way for a new affordable housing project. It will be necessary for you to permanently relocate, because it was determined that you and your family or other occupants are over income. Tltis is a notice of eligibility for relocation assistance. To carry out the p;oject, it will be necessary for you to relocate. However, you do not need to move until you receive a 90- DayNotice. You will not be required to move without at least 90 days advance written notice of the date by which you must vacate, and when you do move, you will be entitled to relocation payments and other assistance in accordance with State regulations and the California Relocation Assistance Law; California Government Code Section 7260 et esq. (the CRAL") and the California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines, Title 25, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 6, Section 6000 et seq. (the `'Guidelines") for residential displacement. - Tile effecrve date of t!lis notice is August :;, 2006. You are now eligible for relocation assistance, including: Coun~cing and odler Advisory Services. Payment for Mcvins Ixpenses. You ma.y choose either (1) a payment or your actual reaso=sable mo~~ing and related expenses, er (2) if you pretPr, a fixed moving expense and dislocation allowance of SI 177.00. Replacen~tent Elousing Paymcrt. Ycu may be eligible for a replacenent housing payment to relit or buy a replacement home. The payment is based on several factors including the i cos? of a "comparable replacement nome," the monthly rent and average cost of utility ! services for your present home. and 30 percent of your average ^_ross household income. Attached is a list of referrals. We would be pleased to provide you with transportation to inspect these dwelling units. The rent and the estimated average cost of utility services for that unit is $129.00. Based on the information you have provided about your income; you may be eligible for a rental assistance payment up to a maximum of $9450.00. This is the maximum amount you would be eligible to receive. It would be paid in a lump sum or installments. ]f you rent a decent, safe and sanitary home where the monthly rent and average estimated _.:,:.., ,.,,ter ~r~ tF"cc than $1295.00, your rental assistance payment would be based on the actual cost of such unit. LAST RGSOR'T HOUSING ASSISTANCE If comparable replacement dwellings are not available when you are required to move or if replacement housing is not available witlvn the monetary limits described above, LILAC -Pepperwood Housing Investors L.P. will provide Last Resort Housing assistance , to enable you to rent or purchase a replacement dwelling on a timely basis. Last Resort Housing assistance is based on the individual circumstances of the displaced person. Your relocation representative will explain the process for determining whether or not you qualify for Last Resort Housing. Contact us inmediately if you do not agree that these units are comparableNto W°ll fmd e We will explain the basis for our selecting these units. And, if necessar}, other units. We will not base your payment on any unit that is not a "comparable replacement home." Should you choose to buy (rather than rent) a decent, safe and us lu ow if you wouldhp efer toubuy adreplacement l orme, and weywill he p$you findOsucl t housing. To obtain a replacement housing payment you must move to a decent, safe and sanitary home within one year after you vacate your present home, and make a claim within 18 months. Therefore, do not commit yourself to rent or buy a unit until we inspect it. I want to make it clear that you a~'e eligible for assistance to help you relocate..In addition to relocation payment and housing referrals; counseling and other services are available to you. A representative of this office will soon contact you to determite your needs and preferences. They will explain your rights and help you obtain th uestions,otleasencontact and other assistance for which you are eligible. if you have any q p Nilsa Arreola and/or Valerie ['ierro, Relocation Consultants, at (909) 476-5974 or it our Seal Beach office at (~62) 59S-69E8. Our on site office is located in Unit A-5, the office hours are "fhursday thru Saturday 12:00 p.m. to 6:OQ p.m. Remember: do not nlovc before we have a chance to discuss your eligibility for assistance. Remember'. do not move before we have a chance to discuss your eligibility for assistance. This letter is important to you and should be retained. C~ Sincerely, cTi ~C~"~-eG Beverly S. Pearce President Pearce Consulting, Inc. I received this letter on (Date) Circle one: }~ in person by U. S. Mail X it was left on my door (Resident signature) Remember: do not move before we have a chance to discuss your eligibility for assistance. This letter is important to you and should be retained. Sincerely, Beverly S. Pearce President Pearce Consulting, Inc. / ~ '~ •'~ L~ I received this letter on (Date) ~ (Resident signature) Circle one: X in ~er~y= . • X by U. S. Mail }( it was left on my door C~ Fearce GonstslYr,ng, Inc. 1 I3eclroonl Referrals • 3-3-06 $s7s.oo Rancho Cucamonga - SYNGLE STGRY GARDEN APT Ft with d? osit, Six month minimum Unfurnished, Lower, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, \Nill consider small p_ P lease, 1-car Parking available, wh?elchair accessible, pool, laundry on site, stc~?, microwav=_, patio air conditioner, Paid gas & gardener & pool service, $875.00 and up, 8383 Fir Dr Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 937-2232 Email: $900.00 - _ ppB R7MENT COMPLEX _a~. ~ ~o-o Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, Cat ok, FI_xible Lase, ParKmg uioud~U, stove, this large and beautiful 124 unit complex has many amenities, please call for current prices and available floor plans!, $900.00 $920.00, 9181 Foothill Bivd Phone: Leasing Gffice at (909) 989-9363 $930.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 bath, Other lease type, Parking included, pool, laundry on site, stove, this 224 unit complex has many amenities and prices vary per unit. Call for current availability and Pricing., $930.00 $950.00, 10244 Arrow Rte Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 980-7235 $990.00 Rancho Cucamonga - APARTMENT COMPLEX - 708 SQFT ool, laundry on Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, Cac ok, Ask about lease terms, Cover=_d parking, p site, quiet neighborhood, stove, microwave, dishwasher, balcony, patio, controlled access building, central air, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, frost-free refrigerator, kitchen pantry, nine-foot ceilings, walk-in closet, washer and dryer, air conditioning, ceiling fa 990.00 AND Upapartment complex has many amenities and price ranges, call for more info.,, $ 8255 Vineyard Ave #708 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 $1,000.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COPAPLEX Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Flexible lease, pool, laundry on site, controlled access building, this large and beautiful 358 unit complex has many amenities, pleas=_ call for current prices and available floor plans!, $1,000.00 $1020.00, 9181 Foothill 61vd Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-9363 $1,030.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Flexible lease, pool, stove, dishwasher, patio, washer and dryer hookups, pet restrictions, this 624 unit complex has many amenities and prices vary per unit. Czll for curr=_nt availability and Pricing, $1,030.00 and upl, 10400 Arrov: Rte Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 945-5588 $1,OtS0.00 S:ancho Cucamonga -APP. i27P~!EN7 COt•SPLEX Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Flexible lease, Parking included, pool, laundry on site, stale, this large and beautiful 384 unit complex has many amenities, please call for current prices and available floor plansl, $1,0-.0.00 $1060.00, 9182 Foothili Bivd Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-9363 Pearce Consulting, Inc. 2 Bedroom Referrals 3-3-06 $l,oao.oo Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Flexible lease, Parking included, pool, laundry on site, stove, this large and beautiful 384 unit complex has many amenities, please call for current prices and available floor plansl, 51,040.00 51060.OO,O.vaifable Now! 9181 Foothill Blvd Phone: Leasing Office a[ (909) 989-9363 $1,195.00 ______ _ rnninn __..,, .,~~~°r naiahborhood, Rancho wca,,,..,~y~ ---- - -- - Unfurnished, 2 bedroom 195 00 Avai!able Novaing inUUoeu, m~~~~~ v ~~~ -••-• ~~ call for more details, 51, Calt for Address Phone: (626) 617-7750 $1,250.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT - 987 SQF ool, laundry Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Ask about lease ter atio,ocenrtralpairklfirep ace, washer on site, quiet neighborhood, microwave, dishwasher, balcony, p and dryer hookups, Gated entrance, Playground,Tennis courts,Two~pools, Spa/hot tub, Additional outdoor storage, Disposal Nigh-speed Internet available, Ceiling fans, Cozy wood-burning fireplaces, Oversized patio or balcony, $1,250.00 AND UP!!, Available Now! 8255 Vineyard Ave #987 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 $1,260.00 ~ _ Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS TOWNHOUSE One year minimum lease, Carpet Floors, Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider pet, Tennis Courts, parking included, pool, laundry on site, quiet neighborhood, stove, dishwasher, Gym, 51,260.00 and up!, Available Idaw! 10935 Terra Vista Pkwy . Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-8211 $1, 290.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT Unfurnished, 2 beoolostove, dishwasher,oYardeba cony, paOo,ea reconditioner, washer and drye ~in Garage parking, p i please call for more information, $1,290.00 and unit, spa, gym, Larger units start at $1285 and up. _ up!, Available Now! 11343 Mountain View Dr Phone: Manager at (909) 941-0408 $1,300.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS TOWNHOUSE 1100 s'gfteancludedsrall appl?ancesB, patio area,opleasescall forsan appointme~try51,300100aPProx $1300.00 deposit, Available Nova! 8167 Vineyard Ave #12 Phone: Jackie at (909) 981-4131 ext.1600 $1, 310.00 Rancho Cucamonga- GATED COMMUNITY Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider small pet with deposit, Six month minimum ease, atio, air conditioner, 1-car Parking included, pool, laundry on site, stove, dcla I for availabil ty YPaid gardener & pool central air, central heat, wa `Vea``a ~dP fvyQ`Nhookups, service, $1,310.00 and up,. 8493 Etiwanda Ave - . Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 899-2631 . Email: yict~ ti.~r11'•rkGr9o°rt'e= cem Pcarcc Consulting, [nc. 2 acdroom Referrlls 3-3-06 $1,330.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider balcony Patio, cenltral alre f ~eplae e,ewasher and Parking included, pool, stove, dishwasher, yard, i 1,330.00, and dryer in unit, tennis courts and spa, 6 different floor plans, call for more details., 5 up! deposit, 7903 Elm Ave .iono~oan-7368 Phone: Leasiuy 0~~,~.. - .---• $1,350.00 Rancho Cucamonga -WONDERFUL 2 VJil1T ons derOsmaI pet~wN h dOeposJit, OnOe Near minimum Unfurnished, End, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, ool, quiet neighborhood, stove, dishwasher, balcony, lease, Carpe[ Floors, 2-car Garage parking, p central air, central heat, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, Available in mid-August is t is beautiful 2 bedroom 2 bath 10015E two=story townhome in the Meadowood Vlllage community in restaurant f& tracnsportaUon conve1nhen els akeoMeadowolod Village complex Is in tself asbeaPtlfgl complex in a park setting with huge green areas, tot lots, basketball courts, tennis courts, & swimming pools. The entire complex has just recently been painted to give i[ that fresh look. This comes w th newertpaintanewer nedutal colored carpet gals stovePldishwashers& disposals There is also a large balcony right outside of the living room for you to chill out after work. Just bring Your 1,350.00, 2000 deposit, Available bhan B/ld2/06 e Pa d watere& trash I& gaedenee& assoeiat on fees,n$ will be completely out no a er 8/15/06 10245 Chaparral Way #E Phone: Jeff at (323) 256-0248 Fax: 323 316 9616 Email: .r u48~eart~link net $1,360.00 Rancho Cucamonga - APARTMENJi1COoMPdeXpet, One year minimum lease, Parking included, Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, pool, quiet neighborhood, refrigerator, stove, $1,360.00 $1430.00, Available Now! SU850 Church St Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 476-6800 Pearce Consulting, Inc. 2 Bedroom Referrlls • 4-1-06 ~1,zso.oo Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APAoRTASk abou98ea5eQteTms, Covered parking, pool, laundry Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, olio, central air, fireplace, vaasher on site, quiet neighborhood, microwave, d~ ound5 Ten bslcourtsPTwo pools, Spa/hot tub, Additio~~al and dryer hookups, Gated entrance, Playg outdoor storage, Disposal High-speed internet available, Ceiling fans, Cozy wood-burning firep aces, Oversized patio or balcony, $1,250.00 AND UPI!, A,vailab!e Nov+! . ..ice v... n.,a rrl Ave #987 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 $1,285.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX- 875 SQ FT ool, laundry on Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Ask about lease terms, Covered parking, p site, quiet neighborhood, stove, microwave, dlshw e[h esMctlons, Chisl262 unit komplex hoe malny central air, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, p amenities and prices vary per unit, Gated entrance, Playground, Tennis courts, Two pools, Spa/hot tub, Additional outdoor storage, Disposal High-speed internet availabl 28 e00 AND UP ~ Ava~lable burning fireplaces, Oversized patio or balcony, Paid water & trash, S Now! 8255 Vineyard Ave #875 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office a[ (909) 989-6363 $1,550.00 Rancho Cucamonga -BRAND NEW APARTMENT incar Gahage parking wheelBhalirsaecessible,dpool quietenei9hborhood, relfngel atorsstovev, Carpets, • unit~Everything sabrandcnew~Tha as aecompletely beandanew building andtyou willrbe tdhe first n person to live in [his uni[. Upstairs units have balconies, downstairs units have patios. Very close to the New Victoria Garden Mall, close to the L0, 210, and the 15 Freeways., y1,550.00, 400.00 OAC deposit, Available Now! 8200 Haven Ave Phone: (909) 941-6620 • Home I About Us Contact Us Directory of Offices Fair Housing FAQ For Landlords Housing Programs Job Opportunities Other-Resources Portability • Procurement Reporting Fraud Section S Housing List Utility Allowance What's New Page 1 of 3 ~(~lt(it~ .r`~(IIJ~GtE'lr~e PAY"b~IENT STANDAP~ & UTILITY ALLOWANCE SCHEDULE HOUSING CiIOICL VOUCHER PAl'NIT+NT STr~'~rQARB (10/l/051. 1 2 3 ~ 3 Bedrooms 0 Payment S 644 g 703 S 820 $ 1165 $ 1361 $ 1565 Standard UTILITY ALLOW'`'ANCE SCHEDULE FY 2006 Apartments Bedrooms Electric Cooking Water Heatu~ g Space IIeating Air Conditioning Other Electric* Gas Cooking Water Heating Space Heating Bottlc Gas Cooking Renter I-Ieahng Slmce Fieatiug Rater Sewer Trash Refrigerator flange/tYlicrowave 0 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 7 8 7 10 13 16 20 23 10 13 17 21 27 31 3 5 6 7 9 11 10 13 17 21 27 31 2 3 3 4 5 6 9 12.16 19 24 28 7 10 12. 15 19 22 q 5 7 8 10 12 17 2h 31 3R 48 55 14 19 25 30 3B 44 14 l9 2S 30 38 44 9 12 16 19 25 ""?8 l7 17 17 l9 17 17 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 3 3 .3 3 3 UTILITY ALLO\l`Aa\C>; SCHEllULT; FY 2006 Houses u~~^nn~ Sousing Authority of the Couniv of 8 ernardino • Pearce Consultinb, Inc. 347 lOtF' Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562}598-6968 Fax (562)598-6998 ~~~ INCOME CALCULATION SHEET (UNIT#C~~ _ ,-_......-. w,,,,,, ~ni.,d.,i~d the income and include this sheer with each f+le. ... ,._ rieeue etyw... ,.,,,. ,......_.... ---... Applicant #1: ~, - ~ `, ~ h ~( ~~----- Employment income calculnfiou: LIrly (2080) /wtkly (52) bi-wk1yX6; a-mthly) mnth'Y (12) n Other income giculalion, type of Th _~ ~ ~ -~ ~~ Cl ~O Total Income: Applicant #2: I+ .~ v ~ •• •• " ° . Employment income calculation: L(rlY (2080) wkly (52) bi-wkly (26) semi-mthly (24) ninthly (l2) my (1) Otlier income calculation, type of Total Income: Applicant Employment income calculation: I-Irly (2080) -wkly (52) bi-wkly (26) semi-ninthly (24) mthly (12) yrly (i) Other income calculation, type of Total Lncome:____.__-_--- • • NFC Employee Personal Pale. }.. 4'= ~ r L [Lj~, ~ v•. ,,;: -_ _ _..._. P?rsanal Infix ! _-:.+~'= - _ :,~ - . - _"- _ __.- ~~~- ~ ~ ~y-~ Personal Qenefitr EPP Home _ `~, :- _ ---~ iCay Cxnod li, 200o J i ~'~) ,Pone Fn'er~dlY LL`~if1 ~~ ~,;:~7 •l: ]u',^ ~lCl l?5:~i'Va'~.';u`.7]rC.UStjF'..op'~:/~ZrSC?l2~if7p.?5~5~8~=1%~~a''.F;(~d3te=~~(36U5~.~it.Z-?C~'=CUL`L j. it\'L'G: ... na~,"•, .-.• Pav Period 11, 2a06 _ _vi?ttachm urt LcVLVCF LLJni~v. .. •' ivi`± i 0810 ~f+!Lfii~D .tiVc P.iiFiA CGn~.4, CP. °!752 Taxable "Aan'sl Sstus. S'^:g4a E.ze m plicn si W io:vances Federal: 7 Siaie: socra~ sec,. rv r:~~R,a=r- ~:~-~t-;e.~T 4a.n~na.. =ts hc!~_ Shi= _riad RPau!ar i ,.. i:.. «._eCC 64.°C 98^..27 L'..1 C'J,,R , /1`' ~T7~~S Gay ~~; ~yty1W'.27.. L~eductiarts Stat•.itary Federa; Income Tax -99.77 Social Security Tax -67 .03 rJ~edicare Tax -14.27 CA Stafe lnrnme Tax -77.08 CA StH/SD! Tar -7. W Other Cka -784.&5 __... !o d^.7s F.F a=, 3S6.75 51C.4C n57. a;~ :~,t&3.7C i .344.44 616.75 10.!. d7 260.53 105.37 Your federal tzxabte 'xages U7is period are 5984.27 ~e~~ r~ji' ~(,'u Lt4~1 ~.r._ L ~ kP irwCiiylitCtfl fg~3-t~~~V i'?f10C ''jeCK'.!im ^y. 0617 ii?n.~ renal ~ndma. 06i2~f200o ray Gale; Gbr~:;-000 ' r. t~vFC:,F ~7~GFe=~~ion~ ,'UIC 1rTEn 18G Dt ii R?b.ce nuvr`a.. -.. On ,,..~SZ^~~' r' `, ti~, _- cCCC Ln1 iti:ni:'e: :rni:3i7 i~BK 2mOUn1 d v5s'0832752 255C 97 :b72''..95 ~~~Fa%=ate ~"~~.'s~~9a~ls~~.~ i v m a H- U.S. Department of Housing 0448 Approval No. 2W6-0016 Claim for Rental Assistance or (exp. o7/s,/2ooB) and Urban Development own Payment Assistance Office of Community Planning and Development 49 CFR 24.402 and 24.401(f)) See back of page for Public Reporting Burden and Privacy Act Statements before completing this form (case HUm6er- For Apencv Name cf Agency Prolecr Plame cr (:umber i n....._.., ice; +-o G use only .l w' ~~ i - ; . Instructions: This claim form is for the use of families and individuals apply ng for rental or down payment as si5ance un er Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies P.ct of 1970 (URA) and may also be used by a 180-day homeowner-occupant who chooses to rent guirlarnce materials Onals websiteoat evww hutl gov/reloeatblo. ylf the u~lamouot olryouHclaim is not app~oved,rthetAgeocy well pro Qde you vanh a w~tten explanation of the reason. If you are not satisfied with the Agency's tletermination, you may appeal that tletermination. The Agency will explain how to make an appeal. ..:__,....,.., .,e Inns must rent/purchase and occupy a decent, ^safe ^andnsan'~~tafr^la ms fornp Ymentafmust'hel filed nolater thant l8 months displacement for replacement houvng paymem eugiu ury t =~ - •'•'~ ~ tu. elephone Numberts) from the date of dis lacement (see 24.207 d d it ~-~7 I G~GCt 1a. YOUr Name(s)(YOU are the la:mant(s))antl rasent da:hng Adtliese ~CJb t-v,,~t'\^tU ~W ~l~~t ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 -\ MC',G'` 2a. HaHave all members of the householtl moved to the same dwelling? 2b. Do you (or will you) receive a Federal, State, or~housing program Yes No pf'rJO', list the names of all members antl the atltlresses subsidy at the dwelling you moved to? ~ Yes ,_, ^ ~ to whim me m v tl in he Remarks 5 Lion. When Did You When Did You AAOVe When Did You Move Address RenUBuy This Unit? To This Unit? Out of This Unit? Dwelling 3. Unit That You Moved From w \ w,. _• ~f(~ (_u"~2 ' 4. Unit Thai You I/IOVetl To "~ ~• ~ Ai, l:rrt.v.~,,.v,-,-, ` i r'~ ~~ , 5. Certification of Legal Residency in the United States (Please read instructions below before completing this section.) Instructions: To quality for relocation advisory services or relocation payments authorized by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, a "displaced person" must be a United Stales citizen or national, or an alien lawfully present in the United Stales. The certificabon Ifcable State below must be completed in order to receive any relocation benefits. (This cedification may not have any standing with regard to app h for hardship exceptions. • laws providing relocation benefits.) Your signature on this claim form constitutes certification. See 49 CFR 24.208(8) & ( ) Please address only the category (Individual or family) that describes your occupancy status. For item (2), please fill in the correct number of persons. RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLDS (2) Family. (p Individual. I certify that there are ~ persons In my household and that I certify that I am: (check one) are aliens lawfully citizen or national of the United States '?12re citizens or nationals of the United States and an alien lawfully present In the United States. present in the United States. 6. Determination of Person's Financial Means (Not applicable to 180-day homeowner-occupants vdho choose to rent. Elver NA in Item 6(6).) (1) Total number of persons in the household (See item b(1) or (2)) Annual Gross House- hold Income. (a9 CFR 242(a)(14)). Enter name of each house- hold member with income (include the income of persons not lawfully present in the (3) Total Gross Annual Income (Sum of entries in item 6(2)) (4) URA low Income Ilmh for number of persons In item 6(1). If Item 6(3) is greaser than item 6(4) -Family is not low~lncome. See 49 CFR 24402 (b)(2)(ii) • (6) Gross PAOnthly Income (Divide item 6(3) by 12) (6) 30% of item 6(6) or "NA'. (If gross annual income item 6(3) is greater than URA lour income limit in item 6(4), enter "NA".) Page 1 0l 3 Previous edL'ions are obsolete Household Income Claimant For Agency Use Only S ~~?i- i S i~ S, ~ ,y IS f 3~ ~~ i form HUD-40058 (07/2006) 7. Determination of Rent and Average Monthly Utility Costs (See 49 CFR 24.402(b)) slruclio ns: To comawe the payment, envies on line (e):nusr ~e11ec1 all utility services. i he re:o~?. itle nlify on lines (2) th:ovgn (5) each ulilhy necessar; to Provitle electricity, „other heatin5lcookiog fuels, water and sevrer. In :hose cases where the utility In WonlhPy RenolV De ebmin'e the eslime~led avecage lmonfhly wfst o aru it ry sonic oby tlrv dmq nler"IId R", lh r has been provided anferrhe applicable amount fheeB cases where the utility eerviGe R pov B,Etl by the monthly rent, e the reasonable estimated yearly cost by l2. IfamonNly housing program subsidy le.g-.HOUSInq Dholce VOUCherlSeclion B,o e) Com arable on line (~). Unit That You Moved From Unit That You Moved To P (For Homeowner-Occupant, rent (Do not complealt assistan ef.) ReD yelling nt Monthly Cost will be determined by the agent J dovm pay (b) I (c) ld)' (e) (a) Claimant For Agency To ee Provided claimant For Agency „tee n„ro By Aaencv 5 (1) Renl (The monthly rental amount due under the terms IS ' and conditions of occupancy. I( utilities are not included r ~~,( .~G (2) (8) lb) 151 ~.. t.G S S ) ~lL Kl+ i•~;,, I$ s Is i 3as ~'" $ S i~ ~` vJ ~S S I-, a )~ S S ~ f, i~~! -~ C G<' S \~d :_~.L cC L ;~~; "~ ~ i i~rC°. f~SD nr Aaencv Use Only 8. Computation of Payment: If you are filing for doyen payment assistance, check this box ^ and skip item 8(1). I RY Claimant (a) (6) Gross Monthly Rent and Wilily Costs (add item 7(1) through (5)) (7) Monthly Housing Subsidy, if applicable (e.g., Housing Choice VouchedSection 8, other) (B) Net Monthly Rent and Utility Costs Enter these (subtract item 7(7) from item 7(fi)) amounts on the appropriate lines in Item 8.) (1) Monthly Rent and Average Morithly Utility Casts for Unit That You Moved to (From item 7(8), Column (c)) (2) fvlonihly Rent and Average Monthly Utility Costs for Comparable Replacement Dwelling „r,~ n.,e ~mn tell (To be provided by the Agency) item 8(2)) (4) fvtonthly Rent and Average Monthly Utility Costs for Unit That You Moved From (From item 7(8), Column (a)) ,.. u,,..,a..,,~nPr-nrruoanls who choose to rent, to be determined by the agency.) (0) Lesser of item 8(1) or (2) (If claim is for dovm payment assistance, enter amount tom If item 6(6) is "NA', enter (5) 30 % of Average Gross Monthly Household Income (From item 6(6), Column (a)). rvr (6) Lesser of item 8(4) or 8(5) (7) Monthly Need (Subtract item 8(6) from item 8(8)) (8) Rent, thiefamount canno exceed the ditto a ne betweeio he aquis too costoo he tl splOacementtdwell nig ando the cost of a comparable replacement dwelling. See lorm HUD-40057, item 5(5 .) w S GC ~, Gli iy, G G::1 ~' -~~ (9) Amount Previously Received (it any) c7~ (10) Amou tt Requested (Subt act item 8(0) from 8(8)) 0. pa tlf orathes6expensesnbysany other soureee information on this claim form and suppomng documentation Is «ue and complete and that I ha e tot been SignatureO of Claimant(s) Z Date I x r ~ ~ I ~V ,~~ ! t \Narnin .HUD will pros to false claims and statements. Conviction may result In criminal and/or civil penalties. (18 U.S.C. 1001, tOt 0,f1o01~?HU 40058 (0712006) Page 2 of 3 Previous editions are obsolete ~~ 10. E(I?awa date (m Mtldlyy/y) be Gonlp leted of ellclbility for rElocafien assistance the Agency ;/~,j'~(`f 73. Payment To Be hlatle In: ~ Lump 14. oU 15. Approvetl Remarks • 1. Dare (mmltltlPff;y) replacem?n: tlwelling inspect?tl and lountl d ELEnI, salt and aanlldr`f ^ blon:hly Installments Gale(mMddhf/yy) p?rson occupiEd r?plate men. ~I Other Installments r F IJo Remarks continued on a separate page? u Yes ~` J Puhlic reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1.0 hour per response. This includes the time for collecting, reviewing, and reporting the data- The information is being collected under the authority of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and implementing regulations al 49 CFR Part 24 and will be used for determining whether you are eligible to receive a payment to help you rent agencyamay no~ oollec[ 1This info~mat6onaand you are not Sequhedbo oomplete tlirsrform unless it degpla}s a ~ nently vat d OP i6 conteollt numherderived. This Privacy Act Notice: This information is needed to tletermine whether you are eligible to receive a payment to help you rent or Uuy a new home. Vou • ou ma not receive this PaYmenl or it may take longer to pay You. This are not required by law to furnish this information, but if you do not provide il, y Y Implemelotin9 beg 9lationstald49 CFR Paart 24 IThef uhformadon I ay betmade avaJable ato a Pede a~agenc cforlse oevPOlicies Act of 1970 (URA), and Page 3 of 3 form HU D~40056 (07/2006) Previous editions are obsolete Residential Claim for Moving U.S. Department of Housing oMR App`o~alpld o?rsv2oosj and Urban Development and Related Expenses Office of Community Planniny ~9 CFR 24.301 and 24.302) and Development ee hack of page for Public Reporting Burden and Privacy Act Statements before completing this form For Agency Name of Agency Prolecl Narne or Number ICase Number ' Use Only L I N ~ ~)C'_..~i P`-"'~',~ to Pi..c I L" `/./ and Real P~ppem; Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA).'/ou may be eligible m apply for either (1) a fixed payment (see 24.302), or (2) payment for actual reasona a moving cosy and related expenses (see 24.301), or (3) in same cases, a payment basetl on a combination of moving options (contact Aoency). All claims for actual expenses must be supported by receipts or other acceptable evitlence-The Agency will explain the dillerences between the types of moving options and will help you complete this :orm. HUD provides information on These requirements antl other guidance materials on its websi;e at www.hutl.gov/relocation. II the lull amount o: your claim is not approved, the Agency will provide you with a written explanation of the season. II you are not salisfietl with the Agency's determination, you may appeal that delerminafion. The Agency will explain how fo make an a cal. All claims for pa men15 must ba Illed nn later than IB months from the tlale of di5pl3eemenf ISeO 24.2071tl1). t. YoOr ldame(s) IYOU are the Claimant (}II antl Presem meeting Address ~ ~ Tolp """"" •-• S,,hr~t~y''`- I f-cr""rh; J( t~'i'.,~( rf ~-`t"2 iZc~~~c_;\,~r~ 2. Have All to the Same Dwelling? LAS rii~3v G1L11 -C;Li.: If "N O " list the n ames of all members and the addfesses to wmcn the moved In me ne marns aeuuun. , Number of Rooms Date Date Dwelling Address (include Apartment No.) of Furniture?' Occupied Vacated 3. Unit That Vou CtC25 ro~~~~,\\ ~<;v.i.:~ H G'-42 L f/~.dG_i ~~~~5-.Oi~, . Moved From a) ~,<v~. c'~x.n :.n. . n- r ~ ,40. t"\. Unit That You 4 1 ~~ ~_ ~~ h I N L V~Gx'T ~-~~ - ' Exclutling bathrooms, . Moved To G.h r;~~t-~ - . ~o•ry~ ,ti L.~', ~\( hallways antl closets. 5. Is This a Final Claim? ~' Yes n No 6. Certification of Legal Residency in the United States (Please reatl instructions below before completing this section.) Instructions: To qualify for relocation advisory services or relocation payments authorized by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, a "displaced person' must be a United States citizen or national, or an alien lavAully present in the United Slates. The certification below must be completed In order to receive any relocation benefts. (This certification may not have any standing with regard to applicable Stale laws providing relocation benefits.) Your signature on this claim Corm constitutes certification. See 49 GFR 24.208(8) & (h) for hardship exceptions. .Please address only the category (Intlividual or family) that describes your occupancy status. For item (2), please fill in the correct number of persons. RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLDS (1) Individual. (2) Family. I certify that I am: (check one) I certify that (here are ~~ persons in my household and that ~_r citizen or national of the Unitetl Slates ~_ are citizens or nationals of the United States and ~ are aliens lawfully - an alien lawfully present in the United Stales. present in the United States. 7. Computation of Payment (See 49 CFR 24.301 and 24.302) Instructions: You may he eligible to apply for either (I) a fixed paymem (sec 24.302), or (2) a)'mem for actual and reasonable moving costs and related expenses (see 24.301), or (3) in some cases, a payment based on a combinaton of moving options (see 24.301(6)). The computation table in this section proctdes you wnh the ability to compute your pa}nnent based on one or a combination of moving options depending on your eligibility and your needs and desires. A fixed payment is used to compute a payment based on the numbers o(rooms o(furnimre within the displacement dwelline. The Residential Fixed Moving Cost Schedule available at www.hud.gov/relocalioq will provide the paymem amoum for the state in which the displacement occuned. (Dore: for persons occupying a dormitory sry'le room or where the move is performed 6y the Aeency at no cost to the displaced person, the paymeN amount is limited to the amoum specified for such moves on the Filed Moving Cost Schedule,) If you choose to claim a fixed payment, fill in the applicable schedule amount in colmnn 7c Line'(3). In some cases, persons who plans to claim only a bled pa)'ment may also be eligible for additional moving options Ie move personal property located outside the dwelling and not considered in the Pixcd Moving Casl Schedule Qungle gym, hot tub, etc.) or far personal properly requiring specialized moving assistance within the dwelling (piano, pool m61e, medico) equipment, clay. In these situations you may also fie eliei6le for a pa}'menl based on actual costs far a commerical move and/or self move (or these items. Contact the Agency (or further assistance. If the Agency determines you are eligible fur other moving options in addition to the fixed paymem, fill in all applicable claim in(onnation requested r ~ a,P ivnefel of m vino onuon specified in the table. • 7a. Corn meicial (dove 7b. Sell Idove ro. aen imove (Actual Costs) (Actual Casts) (Fixetl Sched ul=) ' (Basetl on tourer of 2 bitls) (See 49 CFR 2x.302) (Not to exceed cost of commerical move) Clamant Aqqnc Use Claimant A enc Use Claimant A envy Use (q Hoeing Cast Es penses (49 CFR 24,301(e)(I-7); sec pace '_) ~'L I ~, (Do not include storngc' costs listed separately below). (For i "~ Mobile Ilame Owner Ocdupams also include 24.}01 (g)(5-10), If a] ICa6c. ~ (1) Storage Cos. (Rcyuil'es prior aeency opprocop (Pbt m I I x c>ceed C months) (3) f-ixr Nloeine Cost chrdule Amoum (Based nn number of I rooms of fin'n ilure in hem J). For amount see M1toving Cost I Schedule a~~a noble m ,veav.hud.vo, ;helacmion. (4) Other (Explain in Remarks Seniors) ' (>) Total :\moum of Claint. ~ ) `- ~`• ~ (b) Amount Previously Recciced, if any. ~ ~ { ~LZi'` x" (7 Amount Re vested Subtract line F Gum line i (B) Torul Amount Requested - Cnmbinution DLf ces Only' (add applicable columns 7fa1f 71. 7f h)17) and 7!c)1-Il - Previous versions obsolete. Page I of 2 '~" ,~,,,, ,,.,..-,,,v.. 1- ...,+ ~' B. Certification By Claimant(s): I certify that this claim and supposing information are true and complete and that I have not been paid for These expenses by any other source. I ask That the amount on line p) of Item 7 or line (8) of Item 7 for comhinalion moves be .aid to ^ me ~ the conlraclor(s) (as specified in the Remarks Section). q Signature ) of Claimant(s) & Dale: /- ~ /~~L'_~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Warning: D will prosee e false claims and stateme Its. Conviction may result' _riminal andlor civil penalties. (18115.0. 1001, 1010, 1012; 31 UB.C. 3729, 3802) To Be Co' pleted by the Agency Payment Action ~ Amount of Paymem Signature I Name (Type or PrinQ Date (mm/tld/yyyy) oo~ _ i 9. Recommended S r ~~ - IJ'' Jf~- Cif 10. Approved S `~t ~i~~`r~/~' - ( .C~"C Remarks (AUach additional sheets, ii necessary) .Additional sheets attached? ~ Yes Lligl hie Actual Residential Noting Cx~penses (J9 CPIt 24.301(8)(1-10) (I) Transportation oC the displaced Ixrson and personal property. Transportation casts (or a disance beyond 50 miles are not elieible, unless the Agency determines That relocation beyond 50 miles is justified. (2) Packing, crating, unpacking, and unerating of the personal property. (3) Uis<onneuing, dismantling, removing, reassembling, and reinstalling relocated household appliances and other personal property. For businesses, (arms or nonprofit organizations This includes machinery, equipment, substitute personal property, and connexions to utilities available within the building; i[ also includes modifications to the personal property, including those mandated by Pcderah Stale or local law, code or ordinance, necessary to adapt it to the replacemem structure, the-replacement site, or the utilities m the rcplacemerv sire, and modifications necessary to adapt the utilities al the replacement site to the personal propeny. (4) Storaee of the personal propeny for a period not to exceed 12 mamhs, unless the Agency determines that a longer period is necessary. (~) Insurance for the replacemem value of the property in connexion wish the move m1d necessap~ storage. (6) The replacement value of propeny Iosl, stolen, or damaeed in the process of moving (not through the fault or negligence of the displaced person, his or her agent, or employee) where insurance a~cering such lass, theft, or damaee is not reasonably available. (7) Other moving-related expenses Thai are not listed as inelieible under . N.301(h), as the Aeency determines to be reasonable znd necessary. (c) lire reasonable cost of disassembline, moving. and reassembline any appunarances anaehed to a mobile hmne. such as porches, decAs, skirling, and ;m~nin ss, which were not acquired, anchoring, of the unit, and wilily "hookup" charges. (9) The reasonable cost of repairs andror modif icotions so Ilmi a mobile hmne can be moved and/or made decent, safe, and sanimry. ' (10) The cost of a nonrefundable mobile home park eiurance fee, to the extent it does not exceed the fee al a comparable mobile home park, if the person is displaced Cram a mobile home pallk or the Agency lerennines that payment of the fee is necess~ly to eCCen relocation. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response. This includes the time for collecting, reviewing, and reporting the data. The information is being collected under the authority of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Properly Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR Pan 24 and will be used for determining whether you are eligible to receive a payment for moving and related expenses and the amount of any payment. Response to This request for information is required in order io receive the benefits to be derived. This agency may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form unless it displays a currenlty valid OMB control number. Privacy Act Notice: This information is needed to determine whether you are eligible to receive a payment for moving and related expenses. You are • not required by law to furnish this information, but if you do not provide it, you may not receive any payment for these expenses or it may take longer to pay you. This information is being collected under the authority of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Properly Acquisition Policies Acl of 1970. 7tie information may be made available to a Federal agency for review. Previous versions obsolete. Page 2 of 2 form HUD-40054 (4/2005) ~' la '- RCE COf~15ULTl~!G, INC. 347 10th Street, P.O. Box 56, Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 593-6968 • (562J 598-6998 Pcarce Consulting, Inc. -LING housing .. to Ranrhn COC:lnlO^aae Ck~ Check Request Form • Date: 3' ~-`"~ L, ~~ Amount: $ ~.v~r' S Consultant: ~/«-Si~ CK# Payment type Advance Actual Moving Down Payment Rental Assistance Other 'tenants Name :uul Adldress ~~ ~))il ~1e. ~ tl ~ Date AMT. Type C1:# -4ake Check Payable To (If Other Then Tenant's Name) C'e; ~ti Rcqu//cst:: /~ ~ ~ '1'enruyyt~ t ! ~ i ~ ~S Dale (dousing Cousultauts Signature • ~-~-U '. Date Datc check should be delivered to tenants: ,,: .~ pale ul t~iianUSteve: L'everly 5. Pcarcc, President Date LING Housing Y~-S'i= E~ • Pearce Consulting, Inc. 2 Bedroom Referrals R-3-06 $1,330.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider pet, One year minimum lease, Carpet F oors, atio, central air, fireplace, washer and Parking Included, pool, stove, dishwasher, yard, balcony, p dryer in unit, tennis courts and spa, 6 different floor plans, call for more details!, $1,330.00, and up! deposit, ~n~3 c!m eve Phone: Leasing Office at (909) yCU-i~oo $1,350.00 Rancho Cucamonga -WONDERFUL 2+2 TOWNHOME IN RANCHO CUCAMONG Unfurnished, End, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will oolsqulet neighborhoodasrove, dishwasher,Ib cony, lease, Carpet Floors, 2-car Garage parking, p Available In mid-August is this central air, central heat, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, beautiful 2 bedroom 2 bath 10015E two-story townhome in the Meadowood Village community in restaurant f& t ansportabon convelnhen els akeoMeadowood Vi~age complexhs in tself asbeautifgl complex in a park setting with huge green areas, [ot lots, basketball courts, tennis courts, & swimming pools. The entire complex has just recently been painted to give it that fresh look. This comes w th nlewertpaintanewer neutral colored ca petmgas st vePld shwashers& disposals There is also a large balcony right outside of the living room for you to chill out after work. Just bring your bags and move right in. Tenant Is in the process of moving out and will be completely out no a er • 350.00, 2000 deposit, Available than 8/12/06., Paid water & trash & gardener & association fees, $1, 8/15/06 10245 Chaparral Way #E Phone: Jeff at (323) 256-0248 Fax: 323 316 9616 EmaiP ~ as^aearthlink net $1,360.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX pool,rqu etdneighborhood, reB ge atorlllstove,d$1 360 00 $1430 00, Available Now!'ng included, 10850 Church St Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 476-6800 • Pearce Consu-ting, Inc. 2 Bedroom Referrals 8-1-06 ~i,zso.oo Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT - 987 SQFT ool, laundry Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Ask about lease ter olio, centralpairk'fi ep ace, washer on site, quiet neighborhood, microwave, dishwasher, balcony, p and dryer hookups, Gated entrance, Playground, Tennis courts, Two pools, Spa/hot tub, Additional outdoor storage, Disposal Hi91,260 OOIAND UPI!,~Ava'i!abteilNowans, Cozy wood-burning (replaces, Oversized patio or balcony, $ _ 8255 Vineyard Ave trya ~•e r' Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 $1,285.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX- 875 SQ FT ool, laundry on Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Ask about lease terms, Catlore o~tr Illed access building, site, quiet neighborhood, stove, microwave, dishes eth estnctions, this 262 unit complex has many central air, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, p t be Add't onalpoutdoor toragenDisposaldH'gh speed Internet available, Ceil ng fans PCozy woodhot burning fireplaces, Oversized patio or balcony, Paid water & trash, $1;285.00 AND UP!!, Available Now! 8255 Vineyard Ave #875 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 • $1,550.00 Rancho Cucamonga -BRAND NEW APARTMENT Unfurnished, 2 bedroo wheelBha ~saccessible, pool qulietenei9hborhood, relfrigelratorsstoveW Carpets, 1-car Garage parking, un t ~EVerything sabhandcnewroTh'ds Is a completey br ndanew building and you willrbe therf rstin ~hesNew Vi for a Garden Malpls closeut t[hea10, 210, a'nd he 15 Freeways. h$1 5601100, 400Y00 OAC deposit, Available Now! 8200 Haven Ave Phone: (909)941-6620 • D W Claim for Rental Assistance or Down Payment Assistance ~9 CFR 24.402 -and 24.4O1(f)) ee back of page for Puhlic Reporting Burden and Privacy Act Statements before completing this form U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development OFdO Approval No. 2506-0016 (exp. 07/31 /2008) For Agency Name of Agency Prelect lGame or fyumber / ~ I~ Use only ~%~,/ C, I f_~l~d~~'~rf/~rrcY ~~/='~S' L' - ~/Z Instructions: This claim form is for the use of lamilies and individuals applying for renal or eovnl payniem as eio~o~~~o ~~•~_• ~••- ~••••~•°~ ~~----•~~~~ Assistance and Real Property Acquis ikon Policies Act of 7970 (URA) antl may also be used by a 180-day homeowner-occupant who chooses to rent rather than buy a replacement home. The Agency will help you complete the fo«n. HUD also provitles information on these requirements and other guidance materials on its v+ebsite at www.hud.gov/relocation. If the full amount of your claim Is not approved, the Agency will provide you with a written explanation of the reason. II you are not satisfied with the Agency's determination, you may appeal that determination. The Agency will explain how to make an appeal. Displacetl persons must rent/purchase and occupy a decent, safe and sanitary replacement dwelling within one year from the date of disolacement for replacement housing payment eligibility (see 24.402(a)(2)). All claims for payments must be filed no later than 18 months to Vour Name(s) (You are the laimanl(s)) ana reseN rdaning Adtlress ~ U ~r- yc~.L t (~,' jT [j l /cj FI ~ _~~~ °' ~ ~"' ~' ° """'"- "' .~~hnC~~j Ct^C`i~~cc~C'c~. j~c.ni~ilc Gt.,C~.,,.,.,..sq,Gh~ I~7~' °/~~ -6UG:•'. 2a. Have all members of the household movetl to the same dwelling? 2b. Do you (or will you) receive a Federal. State, or local housing program Yes ~ No (If°No', list the names of all members and the atltlresses subsidy al the dwelling you moved lo? ~ Yes ~ No I v+ hieb Ih may a i In Hem rx aecn When Did You When Ditl You Move When Did You IJlove Dwelling Address RenUBuy This Unit? To This Unh? Out of This Unit? U Fdoved From it Th t Y 3 U Pt t'~~ /-pc+Yh.'(J /3iVd c-z'/Z ~ j~~G,~ /~~t~- ~_~5-C~~K:. n a O . iZ~- 1 cA (' t~y('ll~ 4. Unit That You Moved To I 1 '~~' ~~ /~ i •)!. ~ r""~ ~~ ~" ->t! `• Z~/ d -~.S~G~ ~"~ S '17/~ 17 ( r~ ,i-t [7 5. Certification of Legal Residency in the United States (Please read instructions below before completing this section.) Instructions: To qualify for relocation advisory services or relocation payments authorized by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, a "displaced person' must be a Unitetl States citizen or national, or an alien lawfully present in the United States. The certification below must be completed in order to receive any relocation benefits. (This certification may not have any standing with regard to applicable State laws providing relocation benefits.) Your signature on this claim form constitutes certification. See 49 CFR 24.208(8) & (h) for hardship exceptions. Please atldress only the category (Intlividual or family) that describes your occupancy status. For item (2), please fill in the correct number of persons. RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLDS (1) Individual. (2) Family. I certify hat I am: (check one) I certify that there are ~ persons in my household andlhat .r'"a citizen or national of the United States rare citizens or nationals of the United States and ~ are aliens lawfully an alien lawfully present in the United States. present in the United States. fi. Determination of Person's Financial Means (Not applicable to 180-day homeowner-occupants who choose to rent. Enter NA in Item 6(6).) (1) Total number of persons in the household (See item 6(i) or (2)) Annual Gross House hold Income (49 CFF 24.2(a)(14p. Ente name of each house hold member wit income (include Ih income of persons nr lawfully present in th (3) Total Gross Annual Income (Sum of entries in item 6(2)) item 6(4) -Family is not low-income. See 49 CFR 24.402 (b)(2)(ii) (5) Gross Monthly Income (Divide item 6(3) by 12) greater (6) 309= of item 6(5) or "NA". (I( gross annual income item 6(3) is greater than URA low income limit in item 6(4), enter "NA".) Previous editions are obsolete Page 1 0( 3 Household Income Claimant For Agency Use Only SRS L"t-j ~~U CG ~S i5 6~r 3_s'C:.~4 ~S form HUD-40058 (07/2006) 7. Determination of Rent and Average PA Onthly Utility Costs (See 49 CFR 24A02(b)) Insnuc [ions: To compwe;he paymem, envies an line (9) must real=ct all utility services. There(er>, identify on lines (2) through (i) each utillty necessary to provide electricity, as, other heating/cooking fuels, v,a;er and sever. In thcsz casts v+here the utility service is no: cove retl ty the monthly ren!, intlicata the estimated om-of-pocket monthly cost. (hose cases where fha ufdlry service Is covered by the monthly rent, enter "IMR" (In FApm hly Ren0. Determine the estimated average monthy cost of a utillty servlw by dividing e reasonable a s;irna;ed y=_ a rly cov 5y 12. I I a momMy housing prcg ram subsidy (e.5~. Housino C hoice Vouche rl5ectlon B. pfher) has b==-en provided. enter the applicable a mount m line pl. Unit That You Moved From Unit That You PAoved To Comparable (For Homeovmer-Occupant, rem (Do not complete if claim is for Replacement Monthly Cost will be determined by the agency.)I doom payment assistance.) Dwelling ~ (b) I (a) (c) ' (d) le) I Claimant For Agency Claimant I For Agency I To Be Provided Use O IV I Use Only By A~~ (1) Renl (The monthly rental amoum due untler fie terms ~ S I $ I s i S s ' ~ ~ and conditions of occupancy. If utilities are not includ edl d" ' a~i '. 1 ~ C`. ~ --~~ - ~'-'~" In rent Ilst in item 7(2) to (6)) I ~.~;j~~ - I _ (3) (6) (6) Gross Monthly Rem and Utility Casts S _ ~, 5 ~ 5 _r ~; 5 ! ( :JD 5 a_ ~y:i / / ~C' (add item 7(1) through (6)) / ~ ,~ . ,~ (7) Monthly Housing Subsidy, if applicable S / t S ~/a S ///~ S $ ~//R. (e.g., Housing Choice Voucher/Section 8, other) (6) Net Monthly Rent and Utility Costs - (subtract item 7(7) from item 7(6)) (Enter these S S ~~_~~ =~`~ S ~,f S ~ w~~Gi" S _o„i~ l ~ jG amounts on the appropriate lines in Item 8J _ r ~,~~ B. Computation of Payment: If you are filing for dov:n payment assistance, check this box ~ and skip item 8(1). By C%a;mant For AgencibtUse Only (1) Monthly Rent and Average Monthly Wilily Costs for Unit That You Moved To ~ /~~- s.-~ S ~ ~ S (From item 7(6) Column (c)) (2) Monthly Rent and Average Monthly Utility Costs for Comparable Replacement Dwelling _ -~ / JSC.o (From item 7(ej, Column (ej) (To be provided by theAgency) (3) Lesser of item 8(1) or (2) (If claim is for down payment assistance, enter amount from ,~ item 8(2)) ~~ (4) Monthly Rent and Average Monthly Utility Costs for Unit That You Moved From (From item 7(6), Column (a)) h _~) 1 3 .' S e agency.) (For Homeowner-Oaupants who choose to rent, to be determined by t . , (6) 30 % of Average Gross Monthly Household Income (From item 6(6), Column (a)j. If item 6(6) is "NA", enter E j ~.~~- ~ 'NA' here. ~ ~ (6) Lesser of item 8(4) or 8(6) f / )~~ -'~~ (7) Monthly Need (Subtract item B(6) from item 8(3)) I -d` ;~- /~5 (6) Amount of Payment Claim (Amount on item B(7) multiplietl by 42) (For aHomeowner-Occupant who elects to uisition cost of the displacement dwellin and 9 the a t ff b ~ , cJ q ween erence e rent this amount cannot exceed the di the cost of a comparable replacement dwelling. See farm HUD-40057, item 6(6). / `~ I /`.S~ S (9) Amount Previously Received (if any) u`C~J~ ~ (10) Amount Requested (Subtract item 8(9) from 8(6)) IS -~/ (77_l yl. S 9. Certification By Claimant(s): I cenify That the information on this claim form and supPoning documentation is true and complete antl that I have not been paid for these expenses by any other source. Sig1natu~re(s) of Claimant(s18 Date ~//(/( ~( /~ ( "~I • Warn: HUD v+ill prosecutefalse claims antl statements. Conviction may result in criminal and/or civil penalties (tB U.S.C. 1001, 7010, 1012; 31 US.C. 3729, 3802) Previous editions are obsolete Page 2 of 3 form HUD-30056 (07/2006) ./ 10. Eiaaive date (mwcdryyyy) tt. Date Immiddlyryryry) replacemem 112. uau(mmroeryyyyl To be Com leted ct eligibility for relocation dwelling inspectetl and Icuntl I person occupi=_d replacement the A en~ assls:anae decent, sate and sanitary dwelling 'w 9 Y i ~~-~-1`Co I ~-!7't'~ 4~-I2-O C, p~~,..~em Tn Rn IJ~arln In' n I umn Sum Remarks C~ Remarks continued on a separate page? ~ Yes ~o .I Monthly Installments ~ ~ umer mslaumeius Public reporting burden for this collection of intormalion is estimated to average ..0 hour per response. This includes the ume for conecnng, revlevnny, and reporting the data. The Information is heing collected under the authority of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and Implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 24 and will be used for determining v+hether you are eligible to receive a payment to help you rent or buy a ne~.v home and the amount of any payment. Response to this request for information is required in order to receive the benefits to be derived. This agency may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form unless it displays a currently valid OAAB control number. • privacy Act Notice: This information is needed to determine whether you are eligible to receive a payment to help you rent or buy a new home. You are not required 6y law to furnish this information, but if you do not provide it, you may not receive This payment or it may take longer to pay you. This informalion~is 6ein9 collected under the authority of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA), and implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 24. The intormalion may be made availaUle to a Federal agency for reviev+. Previous editions are obsolete Page 3 of 3 form HUD-40058 (07/2006) u; d ,~I ...".." ~ _ .__ ~CE CONSULTING, INC. 347 1 Qth Street, P.O. Box 56, Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562J 595-6968 • (562) 598-6998 ~- ,;?/-~ ~h Pearce Cmtsulting, Tuc. - LINC housing Pen_ ner~~~ood Al~arhuents 12sudto Cucamatga, CA Check Request Form Date: ~)" ' ~~'-~-% G Amount. S Y J 7. j ""' Case # L~ ' ~ Z-. Consultant: ti"/~LS%1 CK# Payment Type Advance Actual Moving Dorm Payment • Rental Assistance __~Other Tenants Name and Address .t l Date ATT. Type CK# -lake Check Payable'Po (lf Other Then Tenant's Name) ~~ Special Note• ~v~~u~~Ld'V_-\i~1 _ ~~~ . ~ n _~ tt ~~ / //,p//l//ryry C ~j Y.!'LC i T ` ,M ~C.F!.If: ~'V' /!fy _C %- Requcst:/yt((~~ O ~~1"~~ ~ i~ UT~ - ~ Peverly S. Pearce, President 'Cenant ~-f~-gib llate Datc • housing Consultants Signature r {`~ -- pry''-- G' /_, Dale Date check should be delivered fo tenants: _ v^ Datc''ot LC^enls-51UV0: LIVC Housing l~ ~ -i~r,ocA~rroN ~--ovli~c scr-rrDU ~ ~rE~AN~r s~rATOs Tenant Name;, ~ Cousin Tenant Pr ject Addi ss: ~ ~ Replacement Site Address: ~c~.a ~-Cti~~~~.~g~ ~ I ~cw~G~ v Cu~o~~~ Cc~ .~ 1`I >b Current Phone Number: \ I Current Bedroom Size: Replacement Bedroom Sire: (1) (2 (3) (4) (5) \ (I) (2) (3) (4) (5) Floor: (1) (Z ~ (3) Scheduled Moving Date: Scheduled Moving time: Movurg Company: ~A-- ~ U~ Pack Ser«ce: Y N'~ N/A Floor: (I) (2 (3) Move Completed: Perso~Contacted: ~~~ ~/~' Date: ~--~~ npack Service: Y l "~ N/A Notes/Special Instructions: UG-15-2Q~^ yt':49 Ff'1 RELOCATION August 15, 2006 Pearce Consulting Inc. 347 l0a' street Seal Beach, CA 40740 RE: Johnny Crawford move A-ACTIVE RELOCATION 10612 Stanford Ave garden Orove, CA 92840 Deaf Ms.'Pcarce I would like to express my apologies fot the out come of the relocation of Johnny Crawford ordered to be completed on August 15, 2006. , The crew assigned to move Mr. Crawford had to perform'a materials delivery on the way to his residence. Mr. Crawford we_s notified that the move would be starting a little late and as soon as the crew arrived. At 11:10 AM Tvir. Crawford cancelled his move with the truck and crew still in route, slowed down with traffic conditions that day. The crew was then contacted and told to font around. Sadly the truck was only ten minutes away at this point, but it was apparent that nothing could be done at this point to satisfy Mr. Crawford. We will continue to supply the quality service you are accustomed to receiving from A- Active Relocation. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ Ferry Gruy Vice President A-Active Relocation P - S 1 • RELOCATION CONSULTANT STATEMENT Pepperwood Apartments, unit E-42, Crawford and Stovall Mr. Crawford and Ms. Stoval resided in a 2 bedroom unit at Pepperwood. 'they chose the replacement unit at 7868 Milliken Ave. #424 which is also a 2 bedroom emit. They did not have a pet and received no pet allowance. The referrals given to them prior to renting a unit reflected a comparable of S 1,290 which was a 2 bedroom unit at 1 1343 Mountainview Drive. They refused this as their comparable even though they had signed the claim forms on August 1 & 2. They requested a meeting and met personally with Ms. Pearce on August 1 1, 2006 and she adjusted their comparable to $1,505 based upon a recent rental available for $I~,500 at 7876 Henbane Street, which was actually a 3 br 2 bath house. Iu past relocation experiences, law enforcement tenants often request rental of homes versus apartments due to safety concerns, therefore, adjustment of the comparable to a single fap~ily residence is justified. Mr. Crawford had been extremely aggressive with staff and was insistent that due to his. status as a policeman he should be allowed to use his actual replacemenC housing for $1,605 as the basis for payment for his Rental Assistance rather than the comparable unit rate used as the basis for all other Pepperwood tenants. As a compromise, the additional 55.00 was also added to his compromise referral to total $1505. • Mr. Crawford filed his appeal form with us February 22, 2007. He stated in his appeal that the desire for safe housing, due to being a policeman, caused the additional 5100 per month expense, which he is appealing and requesting to be additionally compensated. beverly s. pearce, president, pearce consulting, inc J a rn Peuree Consulting, Inc 2 Bedroom Referrals 8-11-G6 $1,450.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX e parking included, pool, Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Other leaseee Pestrictions, this 624 unit stove, dishwasher, patio, washer and dryer hookups, p complex has many amenities ain~p~~laf~fe ~~ eF unit. Call for current availability and Pricing, $1,450.00 and up., 10400 Arrow Rte phone: Leasing Office at (909) 945-5588 $1,485.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS TOWNHOUSE STYLE APARTMENT Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 1/2 Bath, Will consider pet, One year mi~mennise ourts, Garage parking, pool, laundry on site, quiet neighborhood, stove, gy $1,485.00 and up!, Available Nova! 10935 Terra Vista Pky Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-8211 $1,495.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Parkingsncdludedepool quietlneighborhoodCOrefri9erator,Ostovee$1 495 00 $1530.00, Available Now! 10850 Church St Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 476-6800 $1,500.00 , Rancho Cucamonga -RANCHO CUCAMO NGki HO aEdpOe tRralNair, central heat, Unfurnished, 3 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Garage p 9. Y ceramic file floors in kitchen, large fenced backyard, $1,500.00, + $1500 deposit, Available Now! 7876 Henbane St Phone: Stephanie at (909) 981-4131 ext.1600 • Pearce Consulting, Inc 2 Bedroom Referrals 8-11-06 $1,350.00 Rancho Cucamonga -WONDERFUL 2+2 TOWNHOME IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA Unfurnished, End, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider small ool wluhedt ne~shborhood, year minimum lease, Carpet Blot al air e entral heat,rfireplace, washer and dryer stove, dishwasher, balcony, hookups, Available in mid-August is this beautiful 2 bedroom 2 bath 10015E two- story townhome in the Meadowood Village community in the heart of Rancho Cucamonga within blocks of Terra Vista Town CMn~te~ w ^e ~? Villaae comple gis in restaurant, tk [ranspurcaii~~~ ~~~~~_~~~~~•-=='=~-• itself a beautiful complex in a park setting with huge green areas, tot lots, basketbaii courts, tennis courts, & swimming pools. The entire complex has just recently been painted to give it that fresh look. This unit comes with atwo-car attached garage and the complex has plenty of guest parking spaces. It comes with newer paint, newer neutral colored carpet, gas stove, dishwasher, & disposal. There is also a large balcony right outside of the living room for you to chill out after work: Just bring your bags and move right in. Tenant is in the process of moving out and will be completely out no later than 8/12/06., Paid water & trash & gardener & association fees, $1,350.00, 2000 deposit, Available 8/15/06 10245 Chaparral Way #E Phone: Jeff at (323) 256-0248 Fax: 323 316 9616 Email: icwu48Ca~earthlink net • $1,360.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider pet, One year minimum lease, Parking included, pool, quiet neighborhood, refrigerator, stove, X1,360.00 $1430.00, 10850 Church St Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 476-6800 $1,380.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT - 987 SQFT Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Ask about lease terms, Covered parking, pool, laundry on site, quiet neighborhood, microwave, dishwasher, balcony, patio, central air, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, Gated entrance, Playground,Tennis courts,Two pools, Spa/hot tub, Additional outdoor storage, Disposal High-speed Internet available, Ceiling fans, Cozy wood-burning fireplaces, Oversized patio or balcony, $1,380.00 AND UP!!, Available Now! 8255 Vineyard Ave #987 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 $1,438.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider pet, Flexible lease, Carpet Floors, Parking included, laundry on site, stove, air conditioner, this large and beautiful 521 unit complex has many amenities, please call for current prices and available floor plans!, $1,438.00 and upl, f-°nr°iPal.le €Jove! 9200 Milliken Ave • Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 980-8050 D W Physical Inspection Repor. ~~~~ See back of page for Public reportin st, ection Date (mm/dd/yy`ry) Date P.epor ~~~U~ 2. Owner's Name Since (mm/dd/yy%/) 4. Resident Ntanagers Name ~~•~~~~••••~---~~~>>. 3. Ac n~ Name 5. FHA Number 6. Mortgagee Plumber 7. Number of Units B. Last Quarter Averages Total Monthly Turnover (Units) 9. Name & Title of Ovmer Representative accompanying on Inspection Vacant Days VacanVUnits (Days) lDavsl Part B: Physical Condition. Indlcale the physical condition of each item. If maintenance is needed, describe the problemineed in Part E of this report. PAortgagees need not ~..ni„ ~~~~ o~rmaiP~ HI In stall need dive cast estmates only when such estimates are re wired 6y other instructions (e g., workout or flexible subsidy insWCtions). I vlainle~ Urgency On "'°""`- °'y`°V' v" nonce Prior nonce Prior Needed (HIfNI) Repon ~ Estimated Pleeded (HIPNL) Repod Estimated (YIN (YIN) Cost (YIN) (YIN) Cost Exterior Items Inspected Interior Items Inspected 1 . Exterior Walls and~Foundations 23. Floors, carpets, tiles 24. Stairs, walkways, wmmunity spaces 2. Roofs, flashing, vents 3. Gutters, downspouts, splashblocks 25. Cabinets, doors, closets. hardware 4. Drives, parking lots, paving, curbs 26. Painting 5. Walks, steps, guardrails 27. Curtains and shades Fences, walls, gates 6 - 28. Refrigerators and ranges . 29. Garbage disposal and exhaust fans 7. Porches, balconies, fire escapes 30. Compactors and Incinerators 8. Doors, windows, screens 31. Electrical fixtures and systems ~. Garage and carports 32. Plumbing (fixtures and systems Lawns and plantings . Sprinkler and drainage system ~ 33. Heating and air conditioning 34. Hot water system, boiler room 12. Exterior lighting 13. Exterior painting 35. Miscellaneous Items Inspected 14. Underground gas, water, sewage 36. Benches, play area and equipment 15. Security systems 37. Laundry rooms 16 Energy Efficiency Items Inspected 38. Storage, utility buildings 17. Insulation 39. Elevators 18. Caulking and weather-stripping 40. Project signs and office 19. Storm doors and windows 41. Swimming pools 20. Water saver devices 42. Exterminating 43. Fire Extinguishers 21 22. 44. __ __.__ _ art C: Miscellaneous Observations. Answer eac ques~ion, n a Yes No N/A 1 a. Surrounding neigh rhood is'. Have all repairs required by HUD or the Sa ^ ^ ^ ^ Depressed verage ^ Prosperous . mortgagee been wmpleted? b. This condition is _xpected to: cline -^ D S b. if no, is repair work progressing on schedule? ^ ^ e ame ^ Improve Stay / Yes No N!A 6a. Have any major physical improvements been ^ ^ 2. Are project signs and access adequate? ^ ^ made during the last year? lanned? t ^ ^ Is preventive maintenance adequate and timely? 3a ^ ^ s p b. Are any major physical improvemen . b. Are any changes in maintenance procedures needed? ^ ^ If yes on either a or b, describe in Part E: Comments. 4a. If insurance loss drafts or replacement reser.~e ^ ^ ^ Is the project experiencing any significant 7 ^ ^ funds were released for repairs, have those . repairs been completed? occupancy problems? b. If no, is repair work progressing on schedule? ^ ^ _ rorm~HUD -9822 1190 Previous editions are obsolete. Original to Project O:v ner, One Copy each to Field Office and ivlortgage. Handbook 4350.1 ref Replaces form HUD-9622-A. Page 1 of 2 . .P ~, U.S. Department of HoUSiI G 2 C Oh:1B No. 2502-G3Ee (Exp.3/31/2oou) .and Urban Development ~,~ f - eofHousing 1 ff~~ ( ffi ' ~ /; ~ ~ 1J/~'~`~~~~ `3 ~~~~__ ~ p c r Federal Housing Commissioner ~ Cement Priailed (mmldd/yy//) Report Prepared By I ^ HUD ~'hAnrtnaoee (Enter Com pony !Jame) Part D: Evaluation. Im ortanC In Part E, ex lain ;he basis for an below avera = or unsausracwrv raw. . 1.Overall Physical Condition 2. Maintenance P~ ties and Practices ^ Superior Satisfactory ^ Belova Average ^ Unsatisfactory ^ Superior Satisfactory ^ Below Avenge ^ Unsatisfactory t E. Commenis. Cross reference each comment to a line item in Part B, G or D of this re orf. Httach additional sheets, if needed. Date Closed an, Llne (mmldd/yyyy) P.eference • Part F: Si natures 1. Inspection made by 2. Inspection approved by Date Pursuant to 24 CFR Part 20Z260(a) this information is collected annually to ascertain the physical condition of a mortgaged property. This is necessary for project owners to receive approvals for funding actions such as subsidy requests. This information is non-sensitive and no assurances of confidentiality is Previous editions are obsolete. Replaces form HUD-9822-A. Public reporting burden for this collection of information Is e5imatetl to average 2 hours per response, including the time for review. ing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. to Project Owner, One Copy each to Page 2 of 2 Unite ant Ivlongage. orm HUD-9822 (1190) ref. Handbook 4350.1 r' Driving Directions from 9Q15 Foothill Bled, Rancho Cucamonga, CA to 788 Milliken A... Page 1 of 1 1: Start out going EAST on FOOTHILL BLVD / CA-66 E /HISTORIC .ROUTE 2.9 miles ~,,';_~ . 66 toward TIMBERLINE LN. 2: Turn LEFT onto MILLIKEN AVE. <0.1 miles /~ 3: End at 7865 Milliken Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-8385, Us Total Est. Time: 5 minutes Total Est. Distance: 3.01 miles u ~ ewis Apartment Comm. 'es a member of the Lew!s group of com,.ariies RESERVATION AGRE~T { PRnSRECJIVE RESIDEhlT(s): i m;nncu'rY NAf-0E DEL MA AuDRE55 RESERVATION FEE ~ 1-CI S ~ (7~ Check No.: How did you heir about our community' -~ rr,o a~lriress identified above ([ ~e i __ C=.;`iDLOPD shall reserve ~Le ~asidcnco ._ .--- :,-,_;! Lnz hfOV_-iN DATE. - t 1 -7 (the RESERVATIOIJ __ --.RO~'E~iVE RESIDENT hereby tenders to LANDLORD a re5etvation fee in [he arnoun[ of 5 -E-1 as mr.~.?ensation ter LANDLORD'S reserving the RESIDENCE for PROSPECTIVE RESIDENT. PROSPECTIVE RESIDEN licants before the move-in date and agrees ac';r.o~.vledges [hat ' r'.NDLORD will be unable to lease the RESIDENCE to other app that IANDLORD may retain the RESERVATION FEE in accordance with this Agreement in exchange for foregoing [he opportunity to enter into such other leases. L, per month, calculated as follows: 3. PROSPECTIVE RESIDENT may accept Che R~IDn oCidh term at aeentta9rat tof $ ove ;n date a rental agreement in LANDLOR standard farm, which will provide for a ~_ ~~. -. - - ~ ^• ^ Pet Deposit -- ~ - ~pL RANCHQ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 I NPT. 4 t0( CK FEE '~ ~' c ( RESERVATION DATE Chec Ido ~ is ''~ ~ I f ~~ I (J ~U (t~ !, Prospec(r+e Resiueu~s 101 gals ~ L.'tJ I ?ROSPECTIVE RESIDENT and Lewis Operating Corp. (IANDLOP.D) agree as folloRESIDENCE) in the name of PROSPECTIVE RES?DEP!T 7. The CREDIT CFiECKnEE is - PROSPECTIVE RES If PROSPECTIVE RESIDENT does not sign the rental agreement by the move-in date; LANDLORD shall be free Co lease tl~ RESIDENCE to another applicant. 4, if the rental agreement is signed 6y the move-in date, the amount of the RESERVATION FEE shall be credited tov+an PROSPECTIVE RESIDENT'S security deposit required thereunder. 5. PROSPECTIVE RESIDENT acknowledges that the RESIDENCE might not be available on the move-in date for reasons eyo to move out vahen anticipated. If LAtDLORD Is unal LANDLORD'S control, suds as the failure of the current residznt, if any, shallnofferaaonlikea residence or'I vit~osfvel(5) days RoISwDngCPROSPECTI\+ RESIDENTSwrittenhdemand,t efundttheDeot RESERV:aFIOPJ FEE The offering of the "like residence or the refund of the RESERVATION FEE shall be PROSPECT; RESIDENT'S sole remedy for LANDLORD'S failure to deliver possession of the RESIDENCE. 6. This P.ESERVATION FEE shall be fully refundable until the close a business on the third (3rtl) day after we mutually sign ~ 'I agreement Thereafter, the RESERVATION FEE shall be refundable only if PROSPECITVE RESIDENT is not approved ~~ oaupancy (other than because of PROSPECT?VE RESIDENT'S failure to provide any requlred paperwork) or if t1sIJDLORD d I not deliver to PROSPC-Cf PJE RE4DEfJT possession of Che RESIDENCE (or a °Ilke" residence) by the move-in date. Security Deposit ~ ~ L .. "" ~ ~ I - Subtotal: ~ ~ ~- ~~- ~ $ Less Discount (if apPli~able) , $ - IJCable) ~ Less Move in Special (if:app ~ ~ uC7 Less Reservation Deposit ~ .. *Balance due at signing of Rental Qu I Agreement ~ ~~. ~ ~ .. Cap. Discount i * CASHIER'S CHECK OR MONEY ORDER ONLY ~~ L IDENT'S initials: Base~Ren[" - Short-Term/MTM Rent Furniture Rent Refrigerator Rent Garage Rent -Quantity Storage Rent Quantity-. Size Home/Office Rent Internet Rent Pet Rent: antity TYPe cf Landlord ~~.F-15: Rev: except as requlred by law. 7°-f~-~o~ Date Date Prospective Resident 7 i CU ~:' i. Da[ f -----~- 786"o ivlilli'~cen Avenue, Rancho Cucamon~aJ-CAJ9i7301Phone 909.980.7368/Fax °G9.980.33 b ltn~;n5 - ! r,~l,~ tt~~! • ~• OPPORIUKItY l} Prop;!tY P1arn~- ~: , , ~_ ~ ~,z Date: 'C'r-Rt6~tt~d~~tC)t!6 t~F t_~ASE ~>c~:Gon z~6 0! the arlm ,,.-ter, -rHA C -iH!S nuUce of tenant's intention to tenni ~ e~~~~~tering~ ur aP ~. S~ on tltie .,r ~ this notice, ,,,~,,,;~ to pay atvdl months rat PLE45E lit a" '%" ` A 'Also, tp advised Lear uln,~-, -our vacate data. You vn<i ~- . --, Cal!Fxnia Civi! Cod_. uled to move in shortly ~~ Y our final st~.ement ne+J tenant v+lA 1~ smiled ~ o! ren! WiJ1 be aedd~ on Y 1~ of the month- Airy overpalRn C ,~ rJ~; ~ ~``''Z ~ J~ddre,5 , q~l ~ -~~~ ~% Bldg. &Apt ~ ~ - / . • Phone: ~J ~ ~ ent t vrth its pror!lsion sand we vh0 vacate the apar!m ?Jame: ~ ` vnll terminate wr lease in accrndan~ , We t>eiebY serve ~ce Drat we ~'- / `~ 20 before midnlgM an ~ ._ j ~'tv b' I /~' ~ ~ NEW yapDF'~SS WILL. BE ~; J/1 '~Zl . SON FOR MOVIt'n'~----~-+'`~`- date or soon thereottet for the purpo~ of We arJlhorilQ managemad personnel to antes said premises on the above i ng for damages and MtSSJNG ITEMS. «,,;.~., t30) days uPon`termination of inspeo!i it that are not Pfd watt"' AnY oharges in excrss of the mount of the Secun!Y D~ ' your lease, wit! be reported to our atinmey for collection- . DO N07 WRCr~ 6ELOlN TtIIS L!NL-••OFF!CE USF DtCLY ACKtdOWLC~ED" _~ Original to tenant COPV ?6 tf4'r9rrt. By a r. x. [§ 10001 ch.~a;v.~~c~ Plzoc~~ulzrs A. (§ 10011 Purpose The purpose of these Grievance Procedures is to attempt to resolve disputes behveen the claimant and the Displacing Agency at the lowest possible administrative level while affording the claimant a^ opportunity to have a full and fair review of his or her case. "Cherefore, all .. ~ _._i ,.r-tr.,.......~,...oe,r:,,,,c rn anv cace where relevant evidence slloulU be preseuicd ai iiic iuwcS~ .... ~~ ~- • -~•-,.• --------o-• ~ -- such evidence could have been presented at a lower level and the claimant failed to do so, the Relocation Appeals Board may refer the matter back to the lower level for consideration and determination prior to their considering such evidence. ii. 1§ 10021 Right of Review Any displaced person who is not satisfied with a determination as to eligibility, amount of payment, and failure by the Displacing Agency to provide comparable permanent or adequate temporary replacement housing or the Displacing Agency's property management practices, or not properly applying appropriate regulations, at his or her election may have his or her claim reviewed and reconsidered in accordance wide the following procedures. C. [§ 1003] Request for Further Written Information . A claimant shall first request [he Displacing Agencys designated representative to provide him with a full written explanation of the determination and the basis therefor, which explanation shall be provided to the claimant within three weeks from the date of receipt of the request. This request must be made within the same 18 month period described in § 1009. D, [§ 1004] Informal Oral Presentation If the claimant feels that the written explanation is incorrect or inadequate, he or she may request an ihfonnal hearing with the Director. Ali such requests shall be in writing and shall be accompanied by a relocation complaint form if required by the Displacing Agency. Claimant shall have the burden of determining whether the Displacing Agency requires submittal of a complaint form. The request for an informal hearing must be submitted to the Director within the same 18 month period described in § 1009. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of claimant`s written request, including a relocation complaint form {incorporated as Exhibit "B"}, claimant shall be afforded an opportunity to make :m oral~presentatien to the Director to enable the claimant to discuss rile claim with the Director. The claimant may he represented by an attorney or other person of his or her choosing at the oral hearing (~at the cast of the claimant). The Director shall prepare a summary of die matters discussed anct dzterninations made durZUg the informal oral hearing, place a copy of the summary is claimant's fife, mid sense a copy thereof upon the claimant. 12012/0001/7~]OS5.2 L. [§ 1005] Written Request for Itevicw and P.econsideration At any time within the period described in § 1009 a claimant may file a written request for formal review and reconsideration. Tlme claimant may include in the request for review any statement of fact within the claimant's knowledge or belief or other material which may have a bearing on the appeal. If the claimant requests more time to gather and prepare additional ,naterial for consideration or review and demonstrates a reasonable basis therefor, the claimant's request shall be granted. F. [§ 10061 Formal Review. and 12econsideration by Displacing Agency Director 1. The Director of the Displacing Agency shall consider the request for review and shall decide whether a modification of the 'initial determinations necessary. The' Director shall have the authority to revise the initial determination or the determination of a previous oral presentation. The Director shall consider every aggrieved person's compliant regardless of form, and shall if necessary provide assistance to the claimant in preparing the written claim. When a claimant seeks review, the Director shall inform claimant he or she has the right to be represented by an attorney, to present his or her case by oral or docutentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination, as may be required, for a full and trae disclosure of facts, and to seek judicial review once claimant has exhausted administrative appeal. 2. The Director shall review and consider the initial determination of the claimant's case in light of: a. All material upon which the Displacing Agency based its original determination including all applicable rules azmd regulations, except that no evidence shall be relied upon where a claimant has been improperly denied .an opportunity to controvert the evidence or cross-examine the witness. b. The reasons given by the claimant for requesting review and reconsideration ofhis or her claim. c. Any additional written or relevant documentary material submitted by the claimaht. d. Any fisrther information which the Director may, in his or hzr discretion, obtain liy request, investigation or reseu'ch, to insure fair and full review of the claim. 3. The determination on review by the Director shall include, but is not IInllted t0: a. The Director's decision on reconsideration of the claim. 12012/0001/7~1Od5' n LJ b. The factual and legal basis upon which the decision is based, including any pertinent explanation or rationale. c. A statement of claimant's ri<<;ht to seek fiuther review of his or her claim by the Relocation Appeals Board and an explanation of the stags the claimant nwst take tobUtain this review. The Director shall issue his or her determination of review as soon as possible our uu later than forty-five (45) days from receipt of the last material submitted for consideration by the claimant or the date of the hearing; whichever is later. In case of complaints dismissed for untimeliness or for any other reason not based on the merits of the claim, the Director shall Pumish a written statement to claimant staling the reason for the dismissal of the claim as soon as passible but not later than fifteen (15) days from receipt of the last material submitted by the claimant or the date of the hearing, whichever is later. G. ~§ 10071 Appeals Board Review If the claimant feels that the Director's determination following the informal oral hearing, or written review by the Director is incorrect or inadequate; he or she may request a formal hearing before a Relocation Appeals Board. To obtain a formal hearing before a Relocation Appeals Board the claimant must request in writing that the Director schedule such a hearing. Such request shall be made within tite period described in § 1009. __ Within tifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of claimant's written request, he or she will be notified of the formal hearing date. If the claimant requests additional time to prepare material far consideration and shows good cause therefor, the hearing date shall be continued. to another date. 2. The Relocation Appeals Board shall have the authority to revise the prior detennirtation of the Director. The Relocation Appeals Board shall, at the time it gives notice of the formal hearing date, notify the claimant that he or she has the right to be represented by an altomey or others at his or her own expensc,to present his or her case by oral or documentary evidence; the right to submit oral or documentary evidence; the right to submit rebuttal evidence to conduct such cross examination as maybe required for a full and true disclosure of facts; and the right to seek judicial review once claimant has exhausted achm.inistraiiveagpeal. a. The Relocation Appeals Boattl shall review the initial determination or the determination made at an informal hearing taking into consideration all material upon which the challenged determination .vas made, nil 12012/0001/7510552 applicable rules and regulations, the reasons given by the claimant for requesting review, any additional relevant avidence, oral or documentary, submitted by either the claimant or the Displacing Agency's rcpresen±atives. No evidence may be relied upon by the Relocation Appeals Board where the claimant has been improperly denied an opportunity-to rebut evidence or cross-examine a witness. 5. The Relocation Appeals Board shall make its recommendation within six weeks from the date on which [he formal hearing is concluded or the date of receipt of the last material submitted, whichever is later. G. The Relocation Appeals Board's recommendation shall be made in writing and shall contain its recommendation, the factual and legal basis upon which the recommendation is made and a statement informing the claimant of his or her right to seekjudicial review. 7. The claimant and the Displacing Agency's governing body shall' be promptly served with a copy of the Relocation Appeals Board's recommendation. , H. [§ 1008] Determination by City CounciUAgency Board • Upon reviewing the recommendation of the Relocation Appeals Board, the Director shall refer the recommendation to the City Council/Agency Board at its next regulaz meeting and the City Council/Agency Board shall thereupon fix a time for considering the matter, which time shall be not less than thirty (30) days from the time the recommendation is delivered to the. City CouncillAgency Board by the Director. On the date thus fixed, or on the date to which the matter shall have been continued, the City Council/Agency Board shall proceed to consider the recommendation of the Relocation Appeals Board and shall make and enter on its minutes its final determination therein, which may confirm, modify, or set aside the findings of the Relocation Appeals Board. The City Council/Agency Board's determination in the matter shall be final and conclusive. The Displacing Agency shall provide a written determination b the claimant. The claimant shall be deemed to have exhausted his/her administrative remedies upon the Displacing Agency taking action upon his/her appeal or thefailure of the claimantto timely pursue its rights hereunder. I. [§ 10091 Tittle Limits A claimant desiring either an informal oral presentation or seeking a formal review and reconsideration, including seeking the review of the Relocation Appeals Board, shall make a request within eighteen (13) months following the later ot(i) [he date he/she moves from ate property or (ii) the date he/she receives final compensation for the property. The Director may. but is not required to, extend any of the time limits specified in this Article upon a showing of good cause. Any refusal to waive a time limit may be reviewed is accordance with the 1201210601/'7510"052 procedures set forth in sections 1003 and 1007 above; except that such written request For review shall be Cited within ninety (90) days of claimant's receipt of the Displacing Agency's determination. J. [§ 1010[ Review oC Files E3y Claimm~f ..,.; .,n nto~ :,.,,t rarnr~ts hearine noon his or her claim or the TLc ~;a„t~a„t nab i:~i:..,. _.. _..__ ....- ..-- _ prosecution of the claimant's grievance, except to the extent the confidentiality of the material sought or the disclosure thereof is protected or prohibited bylaw. I{. [§ 7011] Effect of Detcrrnination Dctenninations made by the Displacing Agency regarding acquisition and relocation policies and procedures shall be applicable to all eligible persons in similar sittrations regardless of whether any such eligible person seeks a review. All written determinations shall be filed in the records of the Displacing Agency and available for public inspection. L. [§ 1012] Right to Counsel Any claimant has the tight to be represented by an attorney at his or her expense at any and all stages of the proceedings set forth in this Article. M. [§ 1013) Further Review If the Displacing Agency; as set forth in § 1008, denies the eligibility of a claimant for a payment, or disapproves the full amount claimed, or refuses to consider the claim on its merits because of untimely filing, or any other ground, the Displacing Agency's notification to the claimant of its determination shall inform the claimant of its reasons therefor, and shall also. infomt the clairnattt of the applicable procedures for obtaining further review of this determination. . N. [§ 1014] Joint Complainants Where more than one person is aggrieved by the failure of the Displacing Agency to refer them to comparable permanent or adequate temporary replacement housing, the complainants may join in filing a single written request for review. A determination shall be made as herein provided for each of the complainants. O. [§'lOLJ Judicial Review 1`:othing in this section shall in any way preclude or limit a claimant from seeking judicial review of a claim upon exhaustion of such administrative remedies as are available under these Rules anil Regulations. r ~ L_J l 2012/000 t /7 =1085 2 a m ~. NOTICE OF FiEAR1NG ON BOARD RECONIi\9ENDATION IN THL RELOCATION ASSISTANCE APPEALS OF CRAWFORD AND STOVAL AND OPP012TUt\'[TY TO 13G 1-LEARD October 17, 2007, 4:30 p.m. • 1 11 u [HEARING ON BOARD RECOMMENll.4TION fN -I'I1C- RL-LOCATION ASSIS"LANCE APPC-AI_S OF JOI-1N`\'1' N, CRA~VI'ORD AND il7AQUI'CA STOVAL (CRAWFORD)] PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("RDA") intends to consider the findings of the Relocation Assistance Appeals Board ("Board") in the relocation assistance appeals of 7ohnny N. Crawford and Maquita Stovall (Crawford), and shall make and enter on its minutes its final determination therein, which may confirm, modify, or set aside the findings of the Board. This action is made pursuant to the provisions of dle RDA's relocation assistance guidelines; California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6150, et seq. and the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development; and Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et seq. The RDA's determination is final and conclusive. Once the RDA has made its detemlination, it will provide a written determination to the Appellants. The Appellants shall be deemed to have exhausted their administrative remedies upon the RDA taking action on their appeals or the failure of the Appellants to timely pursue their rights hereunder. If the Appellants feel that the Board's decision is incorrect or inadequate; they may seek judicial review of the RDA's decision, which represents an exhaustion of Appellant's administrative remedies. It is the intention of the RDA to hold a hearing on October 17, 2007, at 4:30 p.m. at the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Chaffey Conference Room, 10500 Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Dated: October i, 2007 y U S ~ " ` Post al~Ser vice,M ° :., r %, h ° 'C uh ` E RTIF IEp MAIL M RECEIpT ~ ~`~` ~ ` r 4 : ' _ (Dor iiestlc M all: On/ N Insur c t y ; o an e Coverage Provided) t By~ ~~,~~ ~ ~/ ,, City Cler ra ~ Postage $ '~ O Certiged Fee ~ ° Retum Reclept Fee (ErMOrsemerd RegWred) Postmark Here p ResUicted Delivery Fee ~ (Entlorsement Requiretl) N nJ Total Postage & Fees ,$ fTl Sent io ° or PO Box No. e A-c.~-. ~t a ~;--5~1a.-Lam;--------- ----------- ---- ---------~ -- -------y--- ~'. i~ ~- - r ~ .. . ~ ,. ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ ~df ~ae'~ 7 Postage $ ~ C¢rtiged Fee ° rk P t ° Retum Redept Fee os ma Here ° (Endorsement RegWred) p Restdctetl OelW¢ry,Fee ~ (Endorsement Regmred) nJ nJ Total Postage 8 Faes ,$ ~ Sant 70 ° ---.._.~-.~.Q j~77~~L9-//--XX----}-~--•---1--J/4~/~p~..q~C~CL(~- ---2/ /~--,/--IBC./.... or PO Box No. - ~ ~ /t}'/~-- f` Stre¢t.APt.N...1...1!!!!`.!.J.--~L!IJ.[LI F.I.~~-A n11~1.J .... Ci ,State, LP+4 „7`-'. I ~ ~ , ~ ~ ¢, a J ~\ r ~ Postage 6 `t '~ Certitletl Fea O ti ~ ~ Return R¢clept Fee P qa,¢ t~ /~~- t O (Entlersement Requiretl) ~' - O Resldcteo C¢Ilvery Fee ~\ REDE\'ELOPDIENTAGENCT ,.~ (Endoraem¢ntRegvtrea) ~ . fU fU Total PostaB¢ 8 Faes ,$ jZANCxo ,.. t` l oe oe :`NO. ` ~--1~(nu f YV i l l i tCP'n f1tiY', ~U,~ f uric zs, zoo7 Johnny N. Crawford Ataquita I~1. Crawford 7868?` illiken Avenue, ~r424 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 • RE: ~\PPE.-ll. OF DIRECTOR'S FOR~LIL DECISIOI~t - PEPPERIWOOD RELOC_~TION Dear nlr. & Mrs. Crawford: "this letter is to confirm receipt of your appeal of the bisector's Formal Decision of May 16, 2007, and your request far a hearing before the Relocation Appeals Board with regard to relocation compensation received under the Utufoxm Relocation Assistance and Real Property rlct of 1970, as amended. A hearing to discuss this matter has. been set before the Relocation Appeals Board at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, July 10, 2007, in the Chaffey Conference Room of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. The Chaffey Conference Room is located on the Upper Level and accessible via die stairway or elevator upon entering die building. Follow the directional signs to the Community Development Depaxunent. .At dre hearing, you have the right to be represented by an attome~~ or others at ~rour open expense; to present tour case b} oral ox documentary evidence; the right to submit oral or documentar evidence; d~ right to submit rebuttal evidence to conduct such cross exatnutation as may be required fox a frill and nlte disclosure of facts; and the right to seek judicial review once die admuusuative appeal process has been exhausted. Sui~cex/c~lc~c~ . Luzda D. Daniels Redevelopment Duecrox in:nn !',.L-,'......~. Il, . P r l H.,. R07 ~ R~~~I,,, !-.~~~,.~~..,,,~ !' v Q1 i~0 rr'I'..I 0(10 1'77.>70lI ~ I~~.rc 909 Jl~ ?8J3 ~ wmu'.d.mnc vi-nicimunna.ru.ui r1 LJ June 9, 2007 T0: Liri~a Daniels, Executive Direcfdt Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency 10500 Civic`Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RECEIVED JUN 1.~ 2pg7 FROM: Jolumy &Maquita Crawford/ Recently Married 7868 Milliken Ave Apt # 424 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Relocation Appeals Board 11us Letter will serve as a notice of our disagreement with your Agency decision to deny our claim for additional benefits under applicable law. We respectfully request that the Director schedule a formal hearing before the Relocation Appeals Board to hear our appeal. I am requesting that I be scheduled for the hearing afrer June 22; 2007, when I return back to California. If there are any further questions, please feel free to call me at 909-997-0059. Sincerely, X11, lmny N. Crawford Maquita M. Crawford • REDEVELOP,~~tENT AGENC\ RANCHO ~OCADdONGA RECE~ ~ f p APR 3 ~~ CONFIRMATION' OF RELOCATION .APPEALS OPTION I elect to proceed with a formal hearing before the Director of the Redevelopment Agency. I elect to waive the formal hearing before the Director, and instead eiect a hearing heiore the fiiii Relocations Appeai t50ard. Dated: ~f ~.zJ J(}~ Dated: 7 J Z`~ Q IUjOU Civic Cencer Dr. • P.O. Boz &17 • Rancho Cucamon Via, C.~ 91729-OSOI • fel 909-477-?700 • Fu 909-477-28 fS • woveci. cinch o-cuc~monea.ca.u> .~.,~_~_ ~~~- : ,.. s._ REDI_\~LLO P~\9EN"I AGLi\'C1' K:_~ .~ -- R~n~~:Ho ~L'C~\\40~'G:1 April 24. 2007 Johnny ~C Maquita Crawford 7568 Milliken A~-enue; Apartment 424 Rancho Cucamon~_a. C.A 91730 Re: Confirmation of Relocation Appeals Procedure Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gawford: 1 am in receipt of your letter dated April 1~, 2007, wherein you expressed your disagreement with my decision to deny your request for additional relocation benefits. Under the Agency rules, you can elect to either proceed to a formal hearing, which is before me, or to waive the Poneal hearing and request that your appeal be considered by the full Relocation Appeals Board. Please confine, by checking the appropriate space below, which option you would like to pursue. Under either option, you have the right to be represented by an attorney, to present your case by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence and to conduct cross- examination as may be required. Once you have exhausted the administrative appeal process, you have the right to seek judicial review of your appeal. My office will consult wiUi you to schedule a hearing date as soon as we receive the signed confirmation bad< frau you. If you have any questions; please contact me at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Qicamonua -~. ,. ~' / ) Linda Daniels Executive Director IfllO11 ~.ieic Crncer G[. ~ P.Q. Rnz SO I:ancho (.LIi91-OIl!']. (.A 91-'9-II$0' • lcl !)0`1-q . -~ 00 •_I-~x h09-~-'.'$-i8 • ~~~~.~r.d-. an, n~~-. uc.lmn ne.~.t.~.u. April ] 5, 2007 ~ 1 LJ RECEIVED APR 18 2007 TO: Linda Daniels. Executive Director Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 FROM: Johnny & Maquita Crawford{ Recently Married 7868 Milliken Ave Apt # 424 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Relocation Assistance Appeal This Letter will serve as a notice of our disagreement with your Agency decision to deny our claim for additional benefits under applicable law. It is a fact that, we the Appellant's occupied a two bedroom residential unit located on the second floor. Tt was determined by Pearce Consultant that we qualified for relocation assistance under applicable law, so • we moved into a new two bedroom upstairs apartment. According to you, Pearce Consulting was delegated by your Redevelopment Agency to administer the relocation project. Be- advised that Pearce Consultant was not from the area and had no idea of what the rents were or should be in the area. This was clearly brought to your Agency's attention during one or two meetings that was held at pepperwood for the residents that would be displaced. It was further brought to your Agency's attention that the apartment Complex's in the City raised their rents once they found out that over four hundred plus residence would be displaced from pepperwood. Several residence s complained to Jan Reynolds in -regards to this problem. The response by Pearce Consultant was, we don't know the area-and we will re do our survey of the pricing in the area in which they did. Be -Advised there was someone from your Agency at all of these meetings or was kept informed to the best of my recollection. This concern was further brought to the Agencys attention during the meetings that were held by your Agency at city hall It is a fact that, we the Appellants have moved into a two bedroom apartment that was on a list provided to us by Pearce Consultant whom your Agency have delegated to administer the project .On March 12, 2007; l Johnny N. Crawford did in fact attend an appeal hearing with you Linda Daniels and. Counsel Regina Danner. • • The dispute at the hearing was about the difference in the amount of benefits thatwe the Appellants feel we our entitled to reeeme under the State law that your Agency and your delegated consulting frm relied on to make your respective decisions. At this meeting you asked me to further substantiate as to why we should receive further benefits. First, I would like to state once again for the record; we moved into an apartment that was on a list that was provided to us the "Appellants" by your delegated authoriq~ approved or contracted by your Agency. According to various telephone conversations that {had with .lan Revnnlds..ehc ~trnns>Iv nnrnnraor, me to move i_ntn a nlarr ennal to nr hitter 1 h_a_vr_ the phone records to prove that 1 have spoken with Ms Reynolds in -regards to this matter. I believe we followed the advice of your de]egated authority and moved into a place that they had on their approved list as a places to move to. I am puzzled by your decision that you have rendered. You have stated that in your opinion there was insufficient justification through my testimony and the Pearce file to approve our claim. You further stated that I provided no factual data to support my claim regarding crime statistics in the general area of concern. • The question's that I must ask is`? How many other situated displaced residence did you asked to proved statistical data to substantiate their claim? Is this a requirement by law that the displaced residence incurs a cost in providing municipal evidence to your agenc}~ in which you could request from the local police department in order for }'ou to make an informed decision? Should your decisions be based on law and not your personal opinion? Why did your Agency hire a Consulting fine that had no knowledge of the area? Do you feel that your Agency treated our appeal fairly based on law and past practices? Arc you aware that after Pearce did their survey; all rents were increased in the area? Do you think that you should have requested the statistical data before you made your decision on our appeal? • Did you ask Pearce how many times they revised their new rental surveys before submitting them to your A~encv? The question becomes; should ] have.not rented an apartment from the approved list that was provided by your "delegated authority"? I have spoken with several residences that have moved from Peppenvood to Del Mar ..~.., .,....,~. ~: ..,, ~w„ :ao~ a, .,.o ~~., ,...,......e ...... .......... ....... ...... .. ....._,..._,.., _ o .,.....,...~. .,~~, .,..~ provided by law. We want to be treated fairly as they were according to our research and as provided by law We are asking that your Agency reconsider your decision and provided us with the additional assistance in the amount of $4,4]0.00 that the law provides for. Be -advise that if your agency decides not to render a favorable decision, then this notice shall serve as our notice for judicial review. if there are any further questions, please feel free to call me at 909-997-0059. Sincerely, /~ ~~.. r~j''e - ~J ~/ ~. Jdhnny N. Crawford /r/ / // Ma ~ta M. Crawford ~~ i • ,J~~~ .1( '' i Rr uevet.oi~~~icn~~r AG~n~Ci~ R,>,~~c xo CUC.A\IONGA (March G, 3007 f ohnn~~ N. Crawford Dlaquita 1\t. Stoval 7SG8 ~dilliken ?,venue, #43=4 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RL: a'PEr1L O~ REL.OC.~TION COIvIPGNS;ITION Deax \Ir. Crawford fi DIs. Stoval: ~i-his letter is ro confirm the Rs~ncho Cucamonga Redec-elopmeut agene~~'s receipt of ~~oui appeal aitd request for a hearing wide regard to relocation compensation received from L.IVC-Pepper~cood Housing under dtc Uniform Relocndon .lssistance and Rrnl Pcopecq r\cr of l97(I, as amended. :A hearing ru discuss this matter has been set for 1:30 p.m., Monday, Match 12, 2007, in the Redevelopment Conference Room of Rnncho Cucamonga Cis is Cenecc, located at 10500 Civic Ccntcr Drive. Please be aware chat ar the bracing aou may provide am ~etitrcn or oral information for the hearing officer's eonsidecadun in dctecm,ining rout appeal. tiinccrrh'. ~a^ Revnnlds Rcdc~~clopmcnt :Anah~sr • ' RECEIVEC f/I,",N' 5 2007 • Personal Inlnnnatiun Nmicz Pursue nt to the Pedeml Privocy Act (P. P.. 93-_ 79) mid the Information Practices Act of 1')77 (Ci•: it Code Sermons 1?93, et seq.), notice is hereby given for tls ;cquest of perronal information by this Corn,. "fhe requested personzl information is colunlary. The pnncipal purpose of d,e voluntary information is to Cacilita[c [he processing oCthis Coen. Thu Lailure [o provide atl or an}• pan oCthe aquesled inronnatiuu muy delay processing of this fern- No disclosarc of pcronal infonn:nion will 6c made unless pcrr•,issi- ble under Aniclu li. Section I"!98 21 of tLc IPA of 1977. Each individual has' the right upon request and nrm,Pr IriP nn fire dn.: :n 6,avntl :dl nrannal information in env ,ecord m intained nn the individu:J 6:•;m identifying particul:u. Direct any inyui:ics on in!?~n„ation n,aintennnce to yo'.u !1'i~ Olficer. ~7ancho C::camonga P,edeceloon,e nt Agency ~ 1NSTRUCT[OidS TO APPELI_AN'fS: I0S00 civic center Dtivc Sta:e aa;u:; brru.- conp`ain; and r.asun<_ for d»s Rancho Oxamonga. CA 917?(? appeal in space 21 botlun,. Attach extra page; if needed. Sil;n and da,c this fom, and mail In the .4 uemion: tan 1Leynold=_, address provided to the left. Redevelopment Analyst Print ar type your full name(s): -d Address of Subject I'ropcny: ~d ~ `f~ " 7'ol~nnY r/ G~4.w~os `(I 81 9o2S Fm°~ t~ ' S o V wl ka~cr,Iw G~+-cgrn~4~~at- 4_ ___ f ? J ~ ~ Present Mailing Address: ~ "this appeal is based on: •~~ ~VE ~~~ 78(08 M i 11, [ligibility only O Amount or Pa}',Went onl}• CU on ~~ ~ Eligibility Fi Amaunt O .This is a request for an informal hearing before the Rmuho Cucamon;a Redevelopment Director (Please refer to the attached Grievance Proceduies.) ??'ill you he present at d,e hearine? 1'cs ~J No ~ Yes ~ No `.Vitt you he represented by an ano~,ey? .7 Your Telephone Number: Dayq~~g9 l'~°5~l Evening This is an appeal of a determination made by Linc-Pe~ppere,ood Housing under the Uniform Relocatim, Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 197Q as amended The nature of the complaint and the eeaso s why 1 believe the deternunation is improper are sta[rd b'~e~lowl~n~~o/ ~o'n ie attached pages-,7 , ::gnntu oY ~pejSrint ~~ Signa ure of Appe~ifanV Date Signed APPELLAN'CC' STATLb1ENT (please attach additional pages ns neaizdl lI ~ nnov~ ~ 1v ~-D ~ ~ ~ ~=`' ~ ~~~ csic 5 c'7 n .s'~~C~t.~ ~clcsrd~.5, ~<Vc.N 1 r~ Wit- - <Il. ~. ~ rG.n1 ~1--, ~'~~ ~d ~oSV3 ~~~vC'C.e~~~ ~ ~'t1C~C~ a , , G~F¢~ ~ [,U~~ ~ ILUC, Z~ II v<<L l rJ 2. ~tv5f'~ I rs cz-~ ~ ~~~~_ts>- a1Jc~ , • Personal Information ~+mice Pursuant to the Fede[nl Privacy Act (P.L.93-579) and the Information Pr.+ctiees Act of 1 J77 (Civil Codr. Sections 17)°, et seq.), notice is hereby given for the regnest of personal informarnn by this form. 'Cite requcs:ed personal in formation is voluntar:. The principal I;urpn;e of d:e ~.~oluntary information. is to facilitate dv processine oCthis Conn. "fhe failure to proeide all nr au}' part of [he r?quested inionnauou may delay processinv o(this Corm. No disclosve oC personal into; mation ••vill be made unless pennsst- bleunder Article b, Section 1793.?a of the IPA of 1)77. Each individual has the right upon request and y ,veer: ca:-:^..__ proper identification to inspect ali persona: mion uaiiun h. ~~~ ~ ""'t ""~'~"'"-`)'°"t"''I I'~r r1O ider.lifying particular. Direct any inyui:ies o^ infornuttion maietenance to yoru~ IPA OlCicer. R~acho Q:camonga Redevelopment Agency 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga. CA 917Jp Auzntimv Jnn Reynolds, ~ Redevelopment .Analyst I^ISTRUCT[01•:S TO APPELLANTS: Stnte nature oCyot¢ complaint and re-asons Cur (his appeal in space al bottom. Attach extra page: if needed. Sign and date this form and mail tc Ote add: ess provided to the left. . Print or type your full name(s): ~ r w ' Address of Subject Property: I 4o2S ~~o+h"~11 81Yt~- G `tL- ~a -3ol~r~nY ~1 G~ 2 S O V ~( YtO (~4-GA.PIC'~Ct,~ L/~ ~ t -T 1 ~ J ~ (L ,.,,, Present Mailing Address: This appeal is based on~. Eligibility only ~ tlfl ~~ Pr~~ ~~~ ~~~ M AmounroCPa}nnent Jnly Eligibility & Amount ~ • G' u Amon ~ ~ This is a request for an informal heanng before the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Director. (Pleese refer to the. attached Grievance Procedures.) `;Jill you be present at the hearing? Ycs t`~J too `Hill you be represented by an attorney? Yes ^ No pp . Your Telephone Nurnber: Dayguf~'!q !`Do Sy Evening This is an appeal of a deterttsination made by Liuc-Pepperwood Houshrg under the Uniform P elocution Assistance and Real Property P.ceuisition Act o(1970, as amended. The nature of the complaint and the reaso rs why 7 believe the detentunation is improper are sn sd below~n %n on re attnchzd pages. ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~-~a,~,°. °~ ~. _ ~~ ~rgna nncrof t ppe ant ~ Sigma ore of eAppeilan~ Dote Sieved API'L].Lr\NTS' S'G\TEis1ENT (please zttadr additional pages as needed) ( l ~ J 1~_1 r L Ll)2 ~DLQ, ).~- ~1 I ~ -ilv b~ iC't~`-=1~~ , a;f i ) ~,~ ~ ~~~ ~ n ~l~ ~as- Ste: c r` r,~ ' ~ ~r S, ~ ~ In. ~~~ -~ -~ ~~ ~ I~N, 2 ~rv5f~-I rs cz- J ,Cr~r(it.~ l W~-~ ~-- It~Vc. 7_ l , ~~ ~. ~- February 20, ?007 TtL: Peppewood Displacement Appeal We would like to be treated fairly just like everyone that was impacted by the forced relocation. We utilize the list that was provided to us by Pearce Consulting, Inc to locate the apartment that we now live in. We were told to find a comparable apartment. I am a law enforcement officer and I have to be careful where I live in the city. I decided • to rent an upstairs apartment for security reasons. I feel that we should be provided the additional monies based on the difference of what we were paying at Pepperwood and what we are paying now. Thank you for your consideration in regards to this request. o ~ ~~/I ~~~ ~ , Johnny N Crawford ~,~ / ~ ~~~ V ' ~ / ~ ~~ / ~ A~~~'`'l/t'l/ Maquita M. Stovall r1 31.. TiTIPW~~ l~y~ ICE COI~JSULTII~IG, If~1C. S47 1 Oth Street, R0. Box 56, Seal Beach, CA 50740 (5S2) 55°-GS68 ~ (5G2) 598 X598 February 1 ~; ?007 Johmw Crawford & \4aquita Stovall 7868 Milliken Ave. #424 Rancho Cucamonga; CA. 91730 Re: Pepperwood Apartments Relocation Benefits Additional Request Dear Mr. Crawford & Ms. Stovall: We previously wrote you to confirm your request fox additional relocation benefits beyond the $8;400.00 you received for relocating from the Peppperwood Apartments. This letter is to inform you that your request was rejected. You may read the attached appeals process and fill out the Appeal Fonn and return it to us in the self addressed stamped envelope we have provided. Your appeal will then be transmitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. They will contact you directly regarding your appeal. Sincerely. . //~_ Beverly S. Pearce President Pearce Consulting, Inc. Att. Cc: City of Rancho Cucamonga LIi~'C File • ~-... ~m.....:._ _..> ~_. f'tARCE CONSULTING, INC. 347 1Qth Street, P.O. Box 5G, Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 598-6cJ68 • (562J 598-6998 \ugust 21, ?006 Jo}uuiy Crawford 7865 vtiiiiken twe r+pl.** -:24 Rancho Cucamonga, CrV 91730 Re'. Relocation Benefits Dear Mr. Crawford: It was a pleasure meeting with you personally; and we at Pearce Consulting, Inc are waiting you to confine }'our meeting with Mrs. Pearce. As we understand your case; your present Rental Assistance Payment based upon the comparable we provided to you, is S 9450.00. This money is available to you for your relocation needs while your request for further funding is being considered. • You have requested that the comparable be adjusted S 100.00 per month, which would bring your new Rental Assistance Payment total to $ 13,60.00. We are providing a copy of this letter to both the landlord and the City for their consideration. Details of oui discussion will be provided to them if necessary. We will be writing you regarding the status of your request in the near fiiture. Should you have any questions or wish to check on the status of your request, do not hesitate to keep in close touch with us at the site office in unit A-5, telephone munber (909) 476-5974. Sincerely, ~. :~•- _. [3everly S. Pearce President Pearce Consulting, Inc. Cc: Rancho Cucamonga City Ha11 L.[NC file • n 0 • AGENDA L INTRODUCTIONS BY BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF 2. JUDICIAL NOTICE (Ms. Bowman): -Relocation Plan -Guidelines -Resolution re Empowernient of Authority to Board Members 3. PARTIES TO EXCHANGE TRIAL DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDE FOR BOARD ~ MEMBERS 4. APPELLANT PRESENTS CASE-CRAWFORD -Opening Statement -Evidence-documentary and oral -Closing -Board may ask questions 5. RESPONDENT PRESENTS CASE-AGENCY -Opening Statement -Evidence-Documentary and Oral -Ms. Daniels -Ms. Pearce -Ms. Daniels -Closing -Board may ask questions 6. APPELLANT-REBUTTAL OR RESTS CASE 7. WITNESSES EXCUSED AND BOARD MAY DELIBERATE OR ADJOURN AND RECONVENE AT A LATER DATE • -Instructions by Board Council-Ms. Bowman. 8. EXPLAIN BOARD REVIEW PROCESS AND APPELLANT NOTIFICATION OF DECISION WITHIN 6 WEEKS FROM THE HEARING OR SUBMISSION OF LAST MATERIALS. • IN THE MATTER OF A RELOCATION ASSISTANCE APPEAL BY MR. JOHNNY N. CRAWFORD AND MS. MAQUITA M. STOVAL BEFORE THE RELOCATION APPEALS BOARD On July 10, 2007 at 10:30 a.m., a formal relocation assistance board appeal hearing ("hearing") before the City'of Rancho Cucamonga Relocation Appeals Board ("Board") was helA at the (`itv of Rannhn ('nramnn no 1.,r~teA ~t 1 f1Gl1(1 ('w:r ('c..m. Tl.:.~o !'l.., Ff .. R....... .-,___. ._._ ___~ ___~_._.____ __._____.__-o__ Rancho Cucamonga, California. The heazing was requested by the residential displacees, Mr. Johnny N. Crawford and Ms. Maquita M. Stoval aka Ms. Maquita Crawford (collectively the "Appellants") following the formal hearing that was held on May 16, 2007, at approximately 9:15 a.m. Appellants formerly resided at 9025 Foothill Boulevard, Apt. E42, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Displacement Property). The Displacement Property was converted into affordable housing, and it was determined that Appellants exceeded the income requirements for the Displacement Property. The Appellants have moved into a replacement property located at 7868 Milliken Avenue, Apt. 424, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Replacement Property). This hearing is part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's (RDA) grievance procedures, California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6150, et seq. The RDA grievance procedures permit a displacee, who believes they are aggrieved, to request a formal hearing before the Board for review and reconsideration of the initial determination or the determination made at an informal or formal hearing regarding their eligibility and/or entitlement to relocation assistance. The present hearing was held to determine whether the Redevelopment Director of the RDA's determination that Appellants' rent differential entitlement was properly based upon $1505.00 per month, not including utilities, instead of $1605.00 per month, not including utilities, or was the determination incorrect or inadequate. Present at the formal hearing were Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director of the RDA; Beverly Pearce, Pearce Consulting, Inc.; Johnny N. Crawford, Appellant; Kirsten R. Bowman, Special Counsel for the Board; and voting Board Members: Mahdi Aluzri, James Troyer, Trang Huynh and Debbie Clark; and non-voting Board Member: Debbie Adams. All persons and parties were given the opportunity to present testimony, cross-examine witnesses and introduce documents, or to submit any items for review by the Board for use in deciding this matter. Standards and criteria used for determining the relocation benefits and allowable expenses were derived from the standards set forth by the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development. California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6 and the RDA's own relocation assistance guidelines. Upon consideration of the testimony, the writings and other items .presented at the relocation appeals board hearing, the reasons given by the Appellants for requesting review and reconsideration of the claim, the following are the opinions, conclusions and decisions of the page 2 of 5 • Board regarding the relocation assistance appeal: I. Factual Background The Appellants occupied a 2-bedroom unit at Pepperwood Apartments. As a result of the Agency project, the Appellants were required to permanently relocate from their 2-bedroom o;.~P,.t; ~1 , .,;• The Appellants qualify for relocation assistance benefits under Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations and the California Government Code §7260 et seq. Responsibility for the implementation of a relocation assistance program is with the RDA. Execution of the relocation assistance benefits program was delegated to the relocation consultant firm of Pearce Consulting, Inc. ("Pearce"). Pearce made the determination and recommendations as to whether the Appellants were eligible for benefits under the relocation assistance program. Pearce determined that the Appellants were fully tenured occupants and eligible to participate in the relocation assistance program as "displaced persons". One category of benefits available to Appellants was a possible "rental differential". California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6104. • At the Board hearing, there was no dispute that Appellants had been given a Notice of .Eligibility and that their benefits were properly based upon their household size. The Appellants' qualified fora 2-bedroom replacement unit. Pearce based the replacement unit rental rate on comparable replacement units. The initial determination of entitlement was based upon a compazable replacement rental rate of $1295.00 per month for atwo-bedroom apartment. After meeting with Mr. Crawford and confirming that he was in law enforcement, Pearce prepared an updated list of comparable'units based upon 2 bedroom homes. Pearce testified that she selected 2 bedroom homes as comparable units because when she had worked with police officers in the past, they believed that homes provided them with a greater level of security and protection. Pearce determined that the Appellants were entitled to to a rental rate of $1505.00 per month, which was based upon a comparable replacement rental rate of $1505.00 per month for a two bedroom home. The Appellants requested that the determination of entitlement be increased to $1605.00 per month. The basis for the increase in entitlement is that Appellants selected their new apartment from the survey of apartments in the Agency's Pepperwood Relocation Plan; that they had concerns about their personal safety because of Mr. Crawford's work in law enforcement; and that other apartments in the City of Rancho Cucamonga commenced "price gouging" once word got out that the Agency intended to relocate a large number of people from the Pepperwood Complex. u page 3 of 5 • II. Did Pearce Properly Determine the Appellants' Level and Amount? of Relocation Assistance Benefits - Replacement Housing Payment for Tenants Rental Differential The Board was provided with a copy of Pearce's file regarding Appellants' relocation assistance benefits. The Appellant testified that he lived in a 2 bedroom, upstairs unit in Pepperwood and he needed to move to a 2 bedroom upstairs unit that was in a safe n nirthl+nrhnnA Fnr thu _ the A.. oll...a col o..ro.7 tr.o T\ol TA., ..le ll.. T..1.. l Il 2006, Appellants entered into a reservation agreement with a representative of Lewis Apartment Communities for a two bedroom, upstairs apartment in the Del Mar complex. Appellant made this reservation prior to having applied for relocation assistance with Pearce. The Pepperwood Relocation Plan was adopted by the City Council on August 2, 2006. On August 3, 2006, Pearce provided Appellants with a letter advising them that they were entitled to relocation assistance, and provided Appellants with a list of comparable units in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The August 3, 20061etter specifically stated "Remember: do not move before we have a chance to discuss your eligibility for assistance." The Appellant stated that he remembered receiving the list of comparable units that were included in the August 3, 2006 letter, but he felt several of these complexes were unsafe. Appellant did not provide any evidence of crime statistics for the complexes he deemed to be unsafe. The Appellant stated that the Del Mar complex was identified on another list, provided • by Pearce Consulting, of available units in apartment complexes. However, Pearce testified that the list was merely a survey of available apartments in the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared for the Relocation Plan. The survey was not a current listing of available units at the time of Appellant's application for relocation assistance benefits. Pearce testified that the list of available units available on August 3, 2006 was different from those identified in the survey. The Appellant stated that once word spread that there would be a large number of tenants from Pepperwood seeking apartments in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, apartment owners in the area raised their rents significantly. The Appellant further indicated that this was true of the Del Mar complex. However, the Appellant did not provide any evidence of the price increases. Moreover, Pearce indicated that any price increases would have been reflected in the August 3, 20061ist of comparable replacement units prepared for the Appellant. Pearce also testified that she was not authorized to offer relocation assistance to Appellant until the Pepperwood Relocation Plan had been approved by the City Council on August 2, 2006. When Appellants applied for relocation assistance, their application specifically stated that the effective date of eligibility for relocation assistance was August 3, 2006. Therefore, Appellants reservation on July 10, 2006 with the Del Mar complex was premature and unauthorized by Pearce. Pearce indicated her initial determination of entitlement,was based upon a comparable replacement rental rate of $1295.00 per month for atwo-bedroom apartment. After meeting with Mr. Crawford and confirming that he was in law enforcement, Pearce prepared an updated list of comparable units based upon 2 bedroom homes. Pearce selected 2 bedroom • homes as comparable units because when she had worked with police officers in the past, they page 4 of ~ • believed that homes provided them with a greater level of security and protection. Pearce determined that the Appellants were entitled to a rental rate of $ ] 505.00 per month, which was based upon a comparable replacement rental rate of $150.00 per month for atwo-bedroom home. The Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6104(d)(1)(B) sets forth the relevant procedures for determining comparable rentals for use in the rental differential entitlement determination. Section ~ i nd/A \(7 \!R \ ~t~tA~ "Comparable Rental. The monthly rental for a comparable replacement dwelling shall be the amount of rent determined by the public entity by one of the methods described in paragraph 6102(c)(1), considering rental charges instead of listing prices or acquisition costs.' Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6102(c)(1)(A) lists three acceptable methods for determining comparable replacement dwellings: comparative method, schedule method and alternative method. The comparative method is an acceptable method for determining replacement rental rates. It appears that Pearce made reasonable efforts to determine replacement rental rates by categorizing the comparable information using among other things: bedroom counts, price • ranges, location and peace officer accommodation, in her selection process. III. Conclusion It is the opinion of the Board that in this instance there was insufficient justification, through the testimony of the witnesses, and documentary evidence introduced, to approve an increase in the Appellants' entitlement. Upon reviewing the recommendation of the Board, the Director shall refer the recommendation to the Agency Board at its next regular meeting and the Agency Board shall thereupon fix a time for considering the matter, which time shall be not less than thirty (30) days from the time the recommendation is delivered to the Agency Board by the Director. On the date thus fixed, or on the date to which the matter shall have been continued, the Agency Board shall proceed to consider the recommendation of the Relocation Appeals Board and shall make and enter on its minutes its final determination therein, which may confirm, modify, or set aside the findings of the Relocation Appeals Board. The Agency Board's determination in the matter shall be final and conclusive. The Displacing Agency shall provide a written determination to the Appellant. The Appellant shall be deemed to have exhausted his/her administrative remedies upon the Displacing Agency taking action upon his/her appeal or the failure of the Appellants to . timely pursue their rights hereunder. If the Appellants feel that the Board's decision is incorrect page 5 of 5 • The Appellant shall be deemed to have exhausted his/her administrative remedies upon the Displacing Agency taking action upon his/her appeal or the failure of the Appellants to timely pursue their rights hereunder. If the Appellants feel that the Board's decision is incorrect or inadequate, he or she may seek judicial review of the Displacing Agency's decision, which represents an exhaustion of Appellant's administrative remedies. Signed t~is ~ ~ day of August 2007. Y1C . B 4 ,.: -...~V _~, y: ~ ~., l~ahdi Aluzri, Chair,of the Board By: B} B} • D W Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 1 of 24 JOHNNY CRAWFORD RELOCATION BOARD HEARING TRANSCRIPT Chaf'fey Conference Room July 10, 2007 KB: Um Good morning everybody we are here for a relocation appeals by um Mr. Crawford on behalf of Mr. Crawford and Ms. Stovall, who also is known as Mrs. Crawford. JC: Yes, ma'am. KB: What we would like to do first to start off with this appeal is to have introductions by the board members and then also the members who are.appealing as well as the responding parties. So if we can start. Introductions of the board members: I am James Troyer (JT), Planning Director for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; I am Debbie Adams (DA) and I am the City Clerk for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; Mahdi Aluzri (MA) with the City Manager's Office; Debbie Clerk (DC), Library Director for the City; and I am • Trang Huynh ('IH), Building and Safety Official with the City and I am Kir-sten Bowman (KB) of Richards, Watson and Gershon and the attorney for the board; and Beverly Pearce (BP) with Pearce Consulting and we are a relocation consultant firm for this project; Linda Daniels (LD) the Redevelopment Director and Johnny Crawford (JC), displaced resident. KB: Now what [would like to do is, is because this matter involves relocation and relocation assistance, I believe that Mr. Crawford has the copy of it and what I would like to make a record of is just the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga which are the rules and regulations. And I have one copy which I will make available to the board. And I would like to make that a part of the record. I would also like to include a copy of the Pepperwood Apartments relocation plan which addresses this particular relocation assistance program. And then finally a resolution, resolution number 07-023, which is the .... resolution which confers upon the board the authority to hear his appeal. And now we got said what the next step would be then, there should be an exchange of any type of written evidence between the respected parties. Mr. Crawford did you bring any documents for evidence? JC: Um at this stage I didn't think I needed them because I presented everything to Ms. Daniels um just a matter of um to articulate to the Board that I feel that um the decisions were not just to my behalf. And um when you would like me to address that issue. 1 will. • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 2 of 24 KB: That will be fine. Thank you very much. And with regard to the Agency, Mr. Crawford you have in front of you the documents, which is the black notebook and that essentially is the relocation assistance file of the Agency for your files. LD: And that is also part of this hearing. KB: Yes, it is. Everything that we discuss and any documents that arise during the hearing will be part of the records so it can be considered by the Board in their decision. And with that said, um Mr. Crawford you are the appellant and um the ball is in your court in terms of discussing your case and um why you feel that you are entitled to a greater rental differential. JC: Ok, can I start off by asking a list of questions and my understandings. BP: Absolutely JC: Um when Pearce Consulting was hired to administer the program was hired as um assumed by the Redevelopment Agency and by the City. One of the questions that I have I do think it's a fundamental question we are reviewing: Was it to dictate to Pearce Consulting or the Redevelopment Agency that I move where you wanted me to move or did I have the discretion . to move to any of those apartments that was on that list? Did I have that discretion? LD: Do you want to answer it or do you want me to? Actually you have the discretion to move anywhere, you could have moved out of state. JC: On that list? LD: No, no, you could have moved, it was your discretion to find any housing JC: Right LD: That was um met your needs JC: um huh LD: You were not limited to only the units on the list of the relocation plan, that was um the units'on the list on the relocation plan were only there to identify availability to make sure that we were not going to be requiring tenants to relocate and not have a suitable number of units in the area. But we had residents move out of state,. we had residents move out of the county area, you were not limited. JC: Restricted at all? • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 3 of 24 LD: No. JC: Okay. And so then it brings the question um Pepperwood, not Pepperwood but Del Mar was one of your apartments that was on the list and I fax to you um the list that was given to me by Pearce Consulting and [know that on that list, I showed you where they were charging $1.330 and i tiave that to v_ rnt because vnu reouested that I fax that over t~ vou. $1330 was the figure before everybody in the area and Barbara (refercing to Beverly Pearce) knows this, everybody in the area raised their rent as soon as they found out people from Pepperwood was being displaced. So the $1,330 that was on that paper, by the time I got over there and you had to secure this thing 60 (sixty) days before because there were absolutely no apartments available in the area after that. And so if there was not a dictate by the City or by Pearce Consulting that 1 move where you want because in all your letters, you talk around where I move. And you said that I could have moved over here and now you just told me from the Board I could have moved anywhere. And if that's a fact, then if I moved where 1 moved there shouldn't be an issue, I shouldn't even be here. Because that was one of the places that was on there, unfortunately; everybody in the City decided to do price gouging. And that's what they did. And Barbara (refemng to Beverly Pearce) knows this cause we brought this to Barbara's (refemng to Beverly Pearce) attention. They went out and not only did they do the survey once they did it twice maybe even three times because they were not from the area. They didn't know the area that • well. And we brought this to Barbara's (referring to Beverly Pearce) attention. And I moved. As you said I could move out of state and I really don't understand why your consultantrefusing to pay the difference. If you um you just said I could move anywhere and it's not the dictate of the City or the Redevelopment Agency or Pearce Consulting and I chose Del Mar. Um we had a discussion about safety that should not have even been an argument now that you said I could have moved anywhere that I wanted. That is what they were charging and that's um it is to me black and white, this is their price. Um I know you guys said in the policy here also and you would assist people with the down payment on a home. It could have been more expensive if I chose to do that but I just chose to stay in a safer part of the City. And now what you have said in front of the whole board, I could have moved anywhere. Some of the places you referred to way back in your letters, um you asked the to present to you statistics showing why one area was not safe over the other. I don't think that should have been on me. I worked in law enforcement by the way and um I had to consider where I moved. Some of these people I have probably locked up. You know. Some of them I probably uh. Because I work with the local law enforcement here so I have to watch where I move. But that is even out of the window now. All your arguments was to deny me the tnoney based on [could have moved over here in all your letters. You know this place and that place, I haven't proven this. I don't think that was even an issue now based on what you said. 1 could have moved anywhere. I moved where 1 considered to be safe and all I'm asking if that is the case as you have stated then I really don't see the argument for the difference in the money. And that place was on the list that was provided to me by Pearce Consulting. And based on that um the difference in where I was staying because I was displaced I think that I'm entitled to it. I think that's fair. • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 4 of 24 KB: I think that the time Ms. Daniels will address that the counter argument in her presentation will be to answer the questions you would like to ask JC: Well no I think she said I could move any place. Uh and I chose Del Mar apartments and why is that particular apartment unacceptable to the Redevelopment Agency, I don't know? New if she could address that. 1 wnnld Inve her in address that. KB: And that would be part of her case. So is there anything else you would like to ask, sir? JC: Um not right at the moment. I'll just hear what she has to say; well maybe I'll have chance when she do. KB: And the board does the board have any questions for Mr. Crawford? MA: Well I would like to hear some background, if it possible. BP: I could probably provide a little bit of that. MA: Yes • LD: The Agency began working with LINC Housing in early 2006, about February 2006, we had an apartment complex with 230 units that was offered for sale and it included about 48 units of affordability already which we wanted to preserve. Because of geographic of it being in the project area and other site specific amenities if you will related to the property. The Council directed staff to work with LILAC Housing on acquiring the entire site for workforce housing/affordable housing purposes. We were successful in the acquisition with LINC and as part of our agreement with ZINC we required that it be income eligible to people or families earning 60% (sixty percent) of the median income or less because we have such a deficiency of affordable/workforce housing in the community. So as part of the process of working with LILAC, we were required as Ms. Bowman indicated to create a relocation plan because we knew while as our goal would be to help satisfy as many tenants that lived in the complex earning that income or below. And helping them in rental assistance, we know some tenants would not qualify so we created a relocation plan which set forth the methodology that would be fair to everyone and the State requires certain methodologies be approved. And one was selected as part of that relocation plan. So that it could be fairly applied to all tenants. And I would like Ms. Pearce to explain that methodology in more detail for you which I think will also help to answer some of the questions that Mr. Crawford has raised. BP: I will try to continue the history if that's okay? KB: [believe we have a question over there. • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 5 of 24 TH: What is the median income and is it based on the room number or family size? LD: It depends on family size because the smaller your family the less it is but the median income is about 555,000 right now. So 60% is about $35,000 to $38,000 range for a family of four, about that. I didn't bring the exact number with me. TH: Thanks. MA: Before the plan can I just get the bottom line, what is Mr. Crawford asking for? And how much is the Agency willing to pay? LD: Mr. Crawford is in an apartment with the rent at $1,605 and then you have a 545 utility allowance which brings it to $1,650 dollars. The comparable unit as Ms. Pearce will explain including the utility allowance is $1,550 so approximately $100 dollars difference um $100 dollars difference between the rent at $1505_ of the comp and the rent at $1,605 because the utility allowance in both situations is $45 dollars so it's a $100 difference in rent differential. DC: And for what period is he entitled to this differential then forever or a certain period of time or how does that work? • LD: Under the relocation benefits you are entitled to a rent differential for 42 months. So you would determine what the comparable rent is, which again Ms. Pearce will explain for you. And you determine what the rent that there paying is and what they use to pay and what their paying and you determine that differential and then you multiply by 42 to determine the relocation. But there is, there is also moving relocation and things beyond the rent differential but what Mr. Crawford is appealing is only the rent differential. But there are other aspects to the relocation benefits. Beyond that. But it is the rent differential. DC: Okay BP: You have to continue with the bottom line. You received the moving claim based on the size of his unit the moving pa}~nent. And $9,450 dollars for his adjusted relocation payment and then he is asking for the other $100 dollars between the relocation benefits and his actual unit times 42 months. So that is $4,200 dollars is what we are discussing so far as the amount. Okay? So I will back up in the overview. At the time a relocation plan is um mandated both by State and Federal law and if you want me to quote you the exact regulations it is the California Relocation Law government code § 7260 Title 25 Chapter 6 Relocation and Real Property Acquisition as amended January 1, 1998. That is the State laws and the Federal laws are the Federal Housing an Urban Development Departments Tenant Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Hand Book 1378 changes I-4, commonly known as ULA guidelines. So that is your legal precedence for everything we are discussing. The relocation client was prepared first by . surveying all the residents at the property. And finding surveying the area for available housing. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 6 of 24 The relocation plan was completed and distributed to all the residents June 26, 2006. August 2, the City Council, it then also distributed a copy of the relocation plan was given to every single resident of the property. And then August 2, the Council excepted it... MA: Can I ask how many were there? LD: 230 units BP: 230 MA: So they were all occupied. BP: Yes LD: As far as, there might have been some unoccupied. But the total unit count is 230. BP: The relocation plan was then accepted by the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency, August 2, and August 3`d the official actual relocation could take place of the as it turn out 171 families who were over this median income number, that we are talking about. So that • everyone else got to stay because their income was lower. 171 of the families were relocated by our firm, representing both LINC and the City. And providing that third party relocation process.. Now ['ll specifically address in Mr. Crawford's case they were initially interviewed for that relocation plan survey back June and then they opened an office, a relocation office on site in an empty apartment per regulations. You are required to do that when you are displacing a lot of people to make it you know available and easy for them. And the Crawfords' had found the place that they wanted to go to and provided us proof July 13~h. At that time there was a discussion by my staff with Mr. Crawford regarding his relocation benefits and the form was filled out and he was not happy with the amount. At the time that didn't really matter because as I said August 2"d was when the Council actually took their action. So it difficult for some of the tenants to understand but Mr. Crawford understood that we couldn't take any action in July. The Council had not accepted the relocation plan and approved us beginning the relocation. All we could do was discuss it. So he got his eligibility August 3`~. Yes. DC: Was there a fonnula that was applied for being the tenants? And if so, what was that fonnula? BP: Yes. On August 5`h after the Council had approved it, I personally met with him and we discussed the formula. Here is the formula and you can find it in your um on actual claim form in your packet that was given to you. KB: Can you let them know where it is? U Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 7 of 24 LD: She didn't put the packets together. BP: No I didn't see the packet. The City has the packet. KB: Perhaps you could walk everyone through it. BP: Yeah. LD: Its in your tab "8/1/06 Rental Assistance Form" you have the front page which talks about incomes and the second page which talks about the determination of rent and average monthly rental utility costs. BP: And so, first we will look at that, second page, of the rental assistance pay. There is a place where he is living which is Pepperwood, the rent is $280 excuse one, $1,280 one thousand two hundred eighty and the utility allowance for that unit based on housing authority print outs. Its $45 dollars this makes $1,325 as the amount used for where he moved from. That's the first number in the formula. The second number is based upon the place that he actually rented. KB: Which is column C. • BP: Column C. And as he said was $1,605 same utility allowance is applied so that the number is then $1,650. MA: The place he moved to? JC: Beverly, let me, let me correct mine. Let me correct my thing. That extra $45 dollars was not part of any utility from Pepperwood. What it was, was that we were renting their dryer and that's what made our rent $1,281. KB: Actually that's part of the utility allowance? BP: Yeah his original $1,281. That's fine. JC: Okay BP: Then the third column E; is the number based on a comparable. MA: I'm sorry [ have a question. This is the $1,650 that is being paid at Del Mar? BP: Yes. • JC: I believe I'm paying $1,605. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 8 of 24 BP: 51,605 MA: $1,605 . I.D: l mean. The utility allowance is snmethinu estahlisherl aoain by the revnlati~ns. its its in order to determine affordability because when you determine someone's income and what they can afford you have give an utility allowance so people are not paying too much in rent and not allowing enough room for utilities. So the $45 dollar utility allowance is just that, it's an allowance. It doesn't mean that actually what he is paying but it's an allowance set by regulation. MA: I understand, but there is one thing that Mr. Crawford suggested and 1 think there is something here that 1 noticed that refers to $1,330 as the original. BP: Yes JC: That's what Del Mar was advertising an apartment for. • MA: Before the big rush. JC: And as he knows everybody went up on the rent, about two or three hundred dollars. MA: In your survey, was it based on, was Del Mar included? LD: Del Mar was included but let me explain there are two sections of Del Mar. There is an older section and a newer section, Mr. Crawford is in the newer section but rents in the older section were in $1,330 to $1,350, as Beverly will identify in the comparable list you will see units. Mr. Crawford's address is on Milliken Avenue, I want to say 9868 or something like that Milliken. The Del Mar apartment complex, the older one, is at 7903 Elm, I believe and it's those units that. It's all in the Del Mar complex but there's an old section and new section but there are units in Del Mar in that $1,300, in the allowable comparable allowance rate. JC: So then [have one question then, um you said that the old section new section were correct. However, when we were moving, those was only (2) two bedroom apartments available. So [ moved were there was availability. So it kind of negates the fact well I could have moved over here because there were none. I moved only were they had a vacancy. And you had to move. You also had to sign an agreement when we did otherwise we would have been out. And she knows a lot of people had to sign agreements. So I moved to the availability. MA: Let's avoid the debate at this point. Let's complete the presentation n LJ Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July ]0, 2007 • Page 9 of 24 BP: Thank you. MA: If you like to take notes, 1 would be very happy to listen to your side when it comes again. BP: So now the relocation plans survey no longer applies. Once the Counci] said August 3rd, nnw vnu can do relncatinn. then we un rort anri aet availahle units that are fur rent. Then hP.Ca11SP. obviously what was for rent for June isn't for rent in August. And when we completed the project in January we continually go out and find what are called comparable units and we put together what is called a referral list. And we provide this to all the people who are that being displaced during the entire relocation process. An example of the referral list that Mr. Crawford received he only, because he had already found a place before he was allowed to move out and be eligible for relocation, he only received one and that's also included in that same book. LD: It's in your "Rental Comparison" tab, which is about three or four back. BP: Yeah. And so you received a copy of the one that he also got. That is what the comparable E column is based on. Bylaw MA: I don't know if I can you the question or ask Mr. Crawford, when did he actually move? • BP: He moved on August 15`h. Right. August 15`h? JC: Yeah. I moved after you told me it was approved. MA: But the arrangements for the rental were made before that? BP: Yeah. JC: Um. They encouraged us to go out and look. 1 mean LD: Which perfectly fine. There's no, the relocation benefits do not change there not effected because he secured a unit before the plan was adopted. Because the comparables start, start when the plans adopted. BP: Then you go out and you find what's available that day. So this was literally dated, August 2"a And that's the list of what was available that day in that week. Then every few weeks it's updated. TH: Thanks Linda. But this would was established after the City announced the claims. What kind of control do we have or you have, that making the, the property management of this company to stay with this price range? Did you have any control in that? Or because today they • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 10 of 24 may say yes $ I ,400 as an example; next week the may say oh $1,500. Did we lock in that price or did it vary and prices went up? BP: The comparable that used on this claim form is already set at the time that that particular tenant is sitting with our staff and filling out their claim form. We fill it out for them if they wish. Snme, of them actually rim anri write it themselves. Anrl ai that time we set the comparable so its, what available for rent at that time. So that every few weeks we published a new referral list but at any given time that someone found their replacement housing and sat down with us to discuss their actual relocation benefits, that's when the amount was set. DC: So it could be that that there would be a varied amongst the 121 people that were relocated. A variety of comparable replacement dwelling amounts. Yes. BP: Yes. Yes. DC: Based on timing. BP: Timing, what's available, but their particular situation. DC: Their amount of money. Its kind of crap shoot of when you happen to sign their lease. LD: Right. BP: Not so much when you sign your lease, it's when you're claiming your relocation benefits and actual relocate. LD: Isn't that after you sign your lease? Usually you make a reservation form, if someone is moving locally they will make a reservation form. They will bring that down and it will say what the rent is. One thing to keep in mind, what the rent somebody is paying really doesn't have a basis in the methodology for determining the comp' You look at the variety of two bedroorns that are available from a variety of complexes in the City and we only looked in the City. We did not include things outside the City. Again, that was important in the methodology to make sure for those who wanted to stay in Rancho; we were looking at the cost in Rancho. So if you go and make a reservation in a complex and you come down and your reservation is $1,100 if we are serving 1 bedroom or 2 bedroom or whatever the comparable unit is and we find that its $1;200 the person actually found a unit that's less then the comparable unit and they move there. They don't get paid the difference between the comp and their actual rent. But the comparable rent is what's used on a weekly or daily basis. Whenever you come in we look at the numbers that day and time so that we are not dealing with somebody who started looking three weeks ago and in a three week time that the rents did change, there not being penalized for it. But it is certainly possible in fact it is, it did happen. If somebody comes in, in September versus • somebody that waited December the rents in Rancho go up frequently. And you might have a Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 1 1 of 24 comp in September that's $50 dollars less then a comp in December. Because it's fair to the tenants and its appropriate based on the regulations to look at the point in time where the person is moving and not a broad window of time that you might be treating someone unfairly. BP: So that the formula works like this. Their actual rent or 30% of their income versus the artnal new rent nr the rmm~arahle whichevP.r is lower of the. hnth nnmherc times 47 Cn that originally Mr. Crawford's benefits were based on the two bedroom comparable of the $1,305 dollars per month comparable. He then met with me personally as he said, we worked this out, I thought at the time, which he then presented his reasons for why he wanted his comparable to be adjusted. You have to keep in mind that once again they are allowed to move anywhere they want to so they could move to Beverly Hills and the comparable keeps you from misspending . tax-payers money. You know just because they rented an apartment for $5,000 a month, you don't pay their old rent versus their new rent. ['m swearing to you. Also, if they rent an inexpensive place even though I have written them a letter and filed out a claim form that estimates their benefits will be this versus that if they rent a place for less, we then pay them less. We pay them based on the lesser of the two. And the relocation guidelines are literally this thick. This is a bizarre niche and this is why they hired out two relocation firms and its complex but this is the one thing that we were trying to compensate on. Is his pa}nnent was his old rent versus the comp so he and I were discussing the comparable based on the regulations and the • laws. I then adjusted his comparable and you could see on your copy that there is my hand writing crossing out $1,340 comparable. And adjusting his comparable and that's back to column E LD: August 3`d of 2006. And 1 misspoke and the comparable initially was $1,295 not $1,305. BP: His um so that I then met with him and adjusted his comparable and 1 want to be clear on this, this is based on laws and regulations because this is Federal, City, State, your money, our money, his money! It's all of our money! So that the law guides how I can do it. It was based on the referrals, it was $1,295 for the unit adjusted per utilities $1,340. That was his comparable and you can see underneath this made his total smaller of what he was going to receive and it was adjusted based on another comparable. In our discussions as he said he specifically rioted that he was a police officer and so in acknowledgement of that because 1 personally have been in, doing relocation for over 35 years and owned my own firm doing relocation since 1991. It was incorporated 1998 this' is all we do. I have moved peace officers, police officers; I have moved people with special needs. And we often solve this by changing their comparables from an apartment which is what the comparable for $1,340 was based on to a single family dwelling. And I adjusted his comparable based on a single family dwelling at 7876 Henbane Street. MA: Which is $1,500 listing? BP: Right. And that is the adjustment and what it was based on. And it is not personal, that I • couldn't give him gift him the other $100 dollars. Under laws and regulations of the State and Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 12 of 24 the Federal government it has to be based on our survey of comparables not the initial survey for the relocation plan. But at that time. What I had at that time was an apartment for $1,340 and a single family dwelling for $1,500 and his payment was then adjusted to the new comparable. LD: So state law dictated that the amount was found comparable at the time that he would sign, the time tha nanerwnrk was Anne Was what the nerann was entitled tn. DC: Is that part State law not part of our guidelines our own guidelines? There's no flexibility there it is what it is as dictated by State law. BP: There is within the State law definitions of comparable and yes it allows flexibility. MA: That was going to be my question, is, what is your definition of comparable? When you came up with this list and you said August 1, BP: August 2nd MA: August 2"d, okay, the list of, from $1,450 to $1,500, so what was the decision of comparable based on? • BP: The actual, his payment was based on the comparable unit of a two bedroom at 11343 Mountain View Drive and then it was adjusted to the single family dwelling of 7876 Henbane Street and that was the comparable number I was using. MA: My question is what are the criteria for what comparable is in this case? The size is one I assume. LD: A two bedroom unit to a two bedroom unit. MA: That's right LD: When you're dealing with apartment you are, amenities are somewhat a factor but there not a factor, you don't say okay this apartment complex had two pools, did this one have two pools? Amenities really, you're looking at the unit itself. Two bedroom to two bedroom, are the bedrooms of comparable size, is the unit of comparable size, um, you look at really two bedroom to two bedroom. MA: What about location? LD: Again, because you surveyed the City, you're surveying the general geographic area of Rancho so the location you look at locations in Rancho. U Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 13 of 24 BP: The comparable area is commonly interrupted as within Smiles. MA: You look at the top City...My 1 inject, please? BP: But it is not required. Yes. JC: You use the word comparable however you didn't take into consideration the price gouging that took place. That took place, that's, that's everyone in that unit brought this to your attention. Even when you did your latest comparable. The prices everywliere jumped from two to three hundred dollars. And you have to make a commitment to move like when I did. And that's a comparable price at that time For what they had. For what was available. They only had um when I went down and look as you told me what, that the City hadn't approved this yet. So we went out, we used our own money to secure the place and they admitted to us, had I came there a week earlier before everyone from Pepperwood started looking I would have been paying $1,300 bucks a month. So I couldn't control the price gouging. LD: I got no evidence that price gouging; I've not had that shared with me by any means. JC: I brought that to your attention. LD: But I've received no documentation or factual evidence of rental structures of the varies times. But assumed that landlords will want to get the most for their money because the methodology requires that a comparable be done at the time a tenant comes in then your serving for that point in time. Not something two or three weeks earlier or not used for something forecasting for the next month. The comparable unit actually would take into account increases in rents over time within the community. MA: Can [ask, Del Mar was not included, on this? BP: It was not one of the units that was used for a comparable. Correct MA: Ok so did, did um JC: Del Mar is on the list. MA: On this list? LD: Let me clarify again Del Mar was included in the relocation plan when the analyst of availability was generated to identify if we have residents needing to relocate and we've only got 10 units available within the City then there are other factors involved. Because we don't, for people wanting to stay in the community we don't have a sufficient supply of rental housing for them to locate too. The relocation plan was used to identify availability, it was not used to Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July ] 0, 2007 • Page 14 of 24 identify comparable unit. And that's very important because as Ms. Pearce said once the plan was adopted the comparable unit could then be taken into account. And the rental unit of those comparable rentals, could be taken into account. Availability and comparable units, there related but there methodology and mathematically not related. DC: Seems to he some cnnfusinn ahnnt the rnirnnse of the list- 1 seem in he hearino frnm Mr_ Crawford that he felt the list meant, that it was a list that you had issued saying that if you move here, and that certain requirements will be met if you move to one of these off the list. And I'm hearing from you that the list was just a record of places that are available. So you are not recommending anybody move into any of those off the list? LD: [n the document it also includes narrative that says this is a listing of available units, it is not a listing. KB: Just for the record, within the Pepperwood Apartments Relocation Plan dated June 26, 2006, section 3 is the study of available housing and 1 believe that this is the list that Mr.' Crawford is referring too. JC: I'm sure. • LD: It's the one you i.e. faxed to us. DC: So Mr. Crawford'what did you think the list represented in your mind? JC: Well when it was given to us by Pearce Consulting DC: I want to hear this. JC: When it was given to us by Pearce Consulting, I infer that, that's the list in place of that first survey. Because um and everyone else over there also. That's where we started going around; Del Mar is not the only place that [went. I went to several other places. DC: Considering that you thought Del Mar was price gouging; did you reconsider maybe looking at another place? JC: Um, I looked at some of the apartments and some of the places that were available were not acceptable for me and my wife, especially my profession. As Ms. Daniels referred in one of her letters back to me well you could have moved over here, that's over there by Hellman Avenue, there's crime over there, you know there's gang bangers over there. I wasn't moving there. If there were no restrictions and where I can move in the City and the City wasn't telling I had to move there, 1 chose to move in a safer area. Unfortunately, that unit that I moved in happened to • be a newer unit, that was clean and there were two available. And I immediately jumped on it. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 15 of 24 On that one the location was safe and um I'm not sure if 1 can lose the argument about safe but that's what was available at the time because everybody afterward was scrambling. I brought the price gauging to Ms. Pearce attention and when we talked. We had very nice conversations and also 1 filed this appeal based on the recommendation of Ms. Pearce. She said you could file for the difference that was our conversation. Um, I thought she was very professional in handling the whole affair. Rut I alsn feel that I'm entitled to that difference haled nn what was availahle at the time. And she note, they were changing the price from week to week throughout the whole City. And I don't think no one from the City considered that, they didn't bother go ask the tenants, I mean apartments such as Lewis, the big companies. DC: Not to dwell. MA: Can [ask, do we have another comps? That was done after this? Or is this the last one? BP: Not within his file, yes, the City has in their possession you know obviously the last file has a copy. The last person that moves has a copy of every single referral list. MA: Is there a way we can get that information? • LD: Yes BP: However it would not be relevant in.this case. LD: But it would not it, its comparable units because you look at the point in time that Mr. Crawford is moving and not the point in time somebody might be moving in December. DC: And that's what I was asking you. Is that dictated by State Law? LD: That you look at the time that they move. Yes. BP: Yes. DC: So there's no flexibility in that aspect of it. In another words, if we say gee that doesn't seem fair, we are talking about a 42-month_period and someone is going to be locked in, if their aggressive about finding a new place to live, which I would be. They might have a lesser comp amount if Mr. Crawford is correct and rent started jumping. Then the person that delays and goes and looks three months later but that is dictated by State Law. LD: Right. DC: That process • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 16 of 24 BP: I want to use the example of Cities have been reprimanded for trying to set the comp at the day of the relocation plan and never make an adjustment, allowing tenants, you know because the rents may go up or down and so the State Law address that and specifically said that the units must be available for rent at that time. r.n: sn as time »r~ures.ces hecanse in the case of Pennerw»»d. residents crnild have moved anv ' time after August and before December. And that's several months and you have people who want to move outside of the area but you do have people who want to stay in the community. And so you adjust the comps, so if you came in September 15`h and somebody else came September 27"' the would have a different comp. It could be the same number but the units available on the 15" may not the same units available on the 27`h. So in order not to penalize the person who waits until December and lives with a comp that was set in August, you adjust that comp when the person comes in. DC: But there is no way the law allows you to address anything prior to that or to make it so that someone who didn't come earlier. LD: Right. Not until the Relocation Plan is set can you address the comp. You can't set the comp. • BP: You can't set the comp until the Relocation Plan has been present to the Council and adopted. LD: Adopted. But if, as I understand Mr. Crawford's argument in a way that would serve to his benefit because if he secured a unit in July and the comp was established in August after rent gouging already took place, his comp conceivable could have worked out to be more than what it might have been in July. So [don't see in.my opinion his securing the unit in July being a detriment to Mr. Crawford in the rent that he obtained by doing it before the plan was adopted. DC: And you're locked into a rent that was established in July for a period of, 1 assumed you signed aone-year lease so you knew that this was going to be the rent. That they didn't jump and jump on you. JC: I consulted with Ms. Pearce, honest, before I did it. And she advised me also, I'm not exactly sure on the date that we signed but you made it very clear to us that up until everything is approved on August 2"~, you know, don't do or the City or Agency could not be binding to that. So whatever [did do cause [really don't remember back that far I did it under the confines of the tune constrains that we discussed. BP: Right. n U Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 17 of 24 LD: I would like to just go back to one thing so that it is in the record. As Ms. Bowman indicated this is an excerpt of the Relocation Plan and that was prepared in June and July and adopted by the Council in August. And the listing that Mr. Crawford had faxed to me from our last hearing in May is this excerpt, which I've identified in the letter that I wrote back to him. This is a study of available housing and it again the purpose of this is to identify and ensure that were not rennirina recirientc who need to relocate that were making cnrP. that they have available units or sufficient number of units available in community so it doesn't force them to move outside the community unless they so choose. This is not set to be a comparable list it's not set to say this is only where you can move. It's identifying in the area there sufficient supply of affordable rental housing or I should say affordable cause it's not Pepperwood. But a sufficient supply of rental housing available to those who do want to stay in the community and even on the last paragraph of the report it talk only about the conclusion that, of the survey that there is adequate available replacement housing. And has no bearing on comparable or restriction that people only move here. BP: So what I'm always trying to do is walking that thin line where I am representing and fairly spending taxpayers money under the law to provide relocation benefits to the tenant and who is being displaced, you know he's being, he's been giving a 90-day notice that he must leave his home and move to a new home and we're requiring that in order to make space for the less • Fortunate low-income resident. So that I'm trying to be sensitive about his rights and about what the payment is based on. And so his payment was adjusted at the time of meeting with me from $1,340 to $],550 and he has appealed for an additional one hundred dollars, which is not in my relocation consulting to the City interpretation additional money that is in any way necessary nor should it be paid under the rents. That doesn't mean that I made the adjustment as we said based on thin air. I made the adjustment from a two bedroom apartment to a single family dwelling and the law allows that. It does not, the law does not tell you to pay every single person the difference between their old rent and their new rent. It says to pay it 30 percent of their income or their old rent.so that if their new rent is more than 30% of their income your displacee will get even more money versus the comparable. And it allows them to go anywhere in choose any place they want. Okay. TH: The City adopted the plan in August, August 3`a or August 2"a BP: August 2"d TH: Now, I understand Mr. Crawford signed up for the lease or reservation, whatever, with Del Mar sometime in July from July to August 2"a, did the Agency discuss or put out notices to the all the tenants, that you do it at your risk? Or because you have not established a comp list yet. Did you do • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 18 of 24 BP: What the Agency did was opened our relocation staff office. So that as he said, we advised the people that of course they could rent a unit if they wanted to but that it hadn't even been approved that they would be needing to move or be paid any money available to them. LD: And that the comp could not be established until after the relocation plan was adopted. TH: I understand. So you did do that, you did notify people that, right? BP: So that, as he said, we told them don't go not yet but you can go if you want. And literally their notices that they received say do not move. And you've received a copy of their eligibility letter also in your packet. TH: Second question, among the 171 tenants that you spoke to moved out nor have moved out do you know to the best of your knowledge any of them or the percent of them that rent some places higher than your comp list that you put out there? BP: 1 could do a specific study of it and give you an exact number. But at this moment all I do is answer generally, yes, many people rented places that cost more than the comparable. There were also some people who rented places less then the comparable and their payment was . adjusted. TH: So that that's, those are the choice of the people? BP: Yes. LD: And I will also say that many residents moved outside the area completely, so, its hard to also say that the comp here in Rancho is going to be very different than the comp in, I don't know, somewhere in that, um. BP: Aber Zitter moved to Wisconsin, I remember her because I just was talking her yesterday. Yes. They can move anywhere. And so I felt that my hands were tied by the legal regulations then I'm trying to find the difference between you know, 1 wasn't going to hold it down to $1,340, I adjusted it up to the $1,550. Based on the single family dwelling, based on the regulations allowing you to acknowledge a peace officer usually the solution is they rent a single family dwelling and then they don't have the same apartment risk problem. JC: I just have one more question, I know I get along with a lot of other people, I did bring to your attention right after August 2"~ of the price gouging that took place and I don't know if you wrote it down but I know there were several people that came in and your comps were totally I won't say out of whack, anywhere from a $150 to $300 dollars difference. And some of the apartments that was on that list where people rent like around $1,903, everybody raised their rent! And we brought that to your attention. • Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 19 of 24 BP: One of the biggest problems that we had, was that we displaced people in single units, studio apartments a single, and there literally at one point during the project displacement was not a single in the entire town in the entire town of the rents. There, so, what we used as their comparable was'a one bedroom. LD: With the methodology allowance. BP: Because that's what you can do. Much like we did with him we can adjust it too a single family dwelling even though he was living in the apartments. MA: Is the age of the building or the unit a Factor in what comparable is? BP: Yes. Square footage, age, size, amenities, everything is taken into consideration. MA: If I have a house that is 1,500 but the house is built in the `50's and its make up, its maintenance and shape of condition, is not equivalent to the unit that the person was living in, does that play a factor in your comparable? • BP: Yes. The regulations specifically address they define what comparable is and they address the fact that you are always looking for the reasonable definition of comparable. And so if you had a pool I do not have use as the comparable another pool. But if you had no garage and now you have atwo-car garage maybe that isn't comparable. So that it addresses it in general terms on specific items. LD: Cause you never necessarily going to get an apples to apples comparison but if you had an apartment complex that was 25 years old and you're comparing to an apartment complex that is 5 years old.or better, if that's all you have available, then that's what you use but in our community because we do have such a large multi-family apartment supply. Comparing things to Pepperwood was comparable to units in Terra Vista that Lewis has build over the years. Comparable units on Foothill and Arrow, those, its hard to say ok its 25 years old and I'm comparing it to something that's 26 years old, you look at age, you look at size, you look at what's available, you look at amenities, you make sure that you obviously don't look at seniors, you'd look at only family. BP: On of the other things says that to go on the referral list. One of my staff has to have viewed the unit and verify that's its available and obviously we do this mostly by telephone calls. We try to make sure that there still available to rent. And as he said during the gouging, all the singles get rented then, we didn't give out any singles. DC: What was the date on the data for this comparable list? CJ Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 20 of 24 BP: August 2"d, correct? DC: And that's when the date it was gathered or when it was released? What I'm trying to get at is if there was price gouging going on I,D: Tt would have heen the date it was collected Ananct end DC: So August 2"d is when this was collected. So we can count on it having been current as of the August 2"d date? BP: You can always take a within a two week period before, during and after August 2"d. It probably means we found a comp a couple days before and then we keep track, we keep handing it out after August 2"d. If someone comes into the office and sets their unit, for instance he and I met on August 5`h. We had all of those units put together on August 2"d but we used it on August 5`h. We generate another list, I think, August 11`h. LD: Mr. Crawford. DC: And was there a difference in the numbers between August 2"d and the August ] la'? • BP: No. There was not a substantial difference in the numbers. There was a change in the apartment buildings that had available units. LD: But the rents were DC: But the comps were the same? BP: Yes. DC: The dollar amounts? LD: The $1,295. If you don't adjust for the utilities. DC: And Mr. Crawford signed his lease, what date? BP: July JC: I think it had to be July. But the price in July, the price in July was $1,605. BP: We have a copy it. Yes. • DC: For that particular unit. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10; 2007 • Page 21 of 24 BP: Yeah. JC: [ have a question. The other question um you are absolutely right you guys came looked at it and no money was issued to me until your people came over and approved that apartment. I stand corrected. Thev annmved it. LD: That it was safe and sound. The purpose For coming out to the unit is to make sure that people are moving to a safe and sanitary unit and that's there no issues regarding that. BP: Well and that the unit actually exist. [mean we have to verify that we have not in any way displaced anyone and created a homeless situation. TH: [would like to ask Mr. Crawford, I heard you mention the form your form of price gouging, I understand that but in your opinion, beside that form the unit you rented any other thing there that agairi in your opinion that is it a bigger unit, a nicer unit, a newer unit, a better paint color looking unit or was there everything maybe the price was a little higher? JC: Um, well I ask them about that and um they said if I had came like a month or a couple • weeks before I signed up, that same apartment was $1,330. So change in the difference came afrer everybody from Pepperwood started going over. That's how I found out too. A lot of people from Pepperwood are living over there. JT: Have they increased the rents? TH: But this was in July. JC: But everybody .started looking ever since Pearce Consulting took over. People were scrambling. Everybody over there was scrambling, we held meetings and people were looking ever since um I'm not sure when we were first given our notice, when you guys came over but it was the early part of the year. People were looking for apartments then. And that's when we brought to Mrs. Pearce attention you know the prices you have on this list, its not reflective and what we are running into in the community. And we brought that to your attention more than one time. Even when I signed I brought it to your attention. DC: But if the comparables were done as of August 2"d, that price gouging would, if it existed, would have been reflected in the new comps that were collected on August 2"~ and again on the 11'x' BP: Yes they were. Yeah. Yeah. • LD: One thing I would like Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 22 of 24 BP: And they did. They did go up for obviously went way up for the singles. Several hundred dollars because there just wasn't one. There was no studio. LD: One thing I would like point out in the May 16`h hearing the formal hearing between myself and Mr. Crawfnrrl 1 Airl inrhute in the resnnnse to him nm twn herlrnnm referrals AateA Annnst 3`d two bedroom referral dated August 1 ~`, that is in the tab date "May 16`h, 2007 formal hearing". I did include comparables two bedroom dated August 151 so that you can see, and I know, Mr. Aluzri, one of your questions was talking about comps. But you can see the range in comps beyond what Mr. Crawford had received on August 2°`~. Some additional comps that were part of the previous hearings at location in Rancho Cucamonga. Again, comparable units in teens of size, and age, and locations and there all in Rancho Cucamonga and there both two bedroom and one bedroom although Mr. Crawford is focusing only on a two bedroom. But we can work to get other comps. There's a couple things JT: Was there just an environment of rents rising in general? Or in your opinion there was price gouging? LD: Again I've received no factual information on price gouging. I've received nothing from • Mr. Crawford indicating here are rents at Del Mar or any other complex at the time of July, at the time of August, at the time of September, I can not respond to the price gouging or the rents, the comparable as I think you all know in the market of Rancho Cucamonga, rents go up from time to time. Whether its just a matter of the economy or other landlords seeing tenants needing to be displaced and raising rents. But I have no factual evidence of rent increases as a result of Pepperwood. JC: May I answer to that? When you guys had the City Council meeting, I didn't attend but there was a meeting where all the Redevelopment Department held it and I think Beverly was there. It was brought to everybody attention at that time of the price gouging. This is nothing new. Ms. Pearce was well aware of it. And they had a meeting here. I didn't attend that meeting but I do have, I can get the notes from it. I know that there were several people that did attend it. And uin it was brought to everyone's attention that everyone is raising their rent because of the move. It's not something I'm pulling out of the sky. It took place. And Beverly am I correct, did we not bring it to your attention? BP: Yes, you did and JC: Notjust me, everyone did. BP: And so, all we do is under the rights, we constantly collect additional referrals and comparables. n U Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 23 of 24 DC: The comps were adjusted. LD: Based on the rent, based on the time. BP: Yeah. LD: [have one thing [just like to say and I don't know if, are we nearing a close? 1 don't know if an argutnent is a proper phrase, but Mr.. Crawford in his appeal has indicated that his first sentence I wanted, I want to be treated fairly. In my opinion in listening to both the informal appeal and the formal appeal and evaluating the methodology set forth in the Relocation Plan and specific to the application and this case, [feel that Mr. Crawford is being treated fairly as all the tenants are being treated fairly. By applying a standard, well you may say a standard methodology, Ms. Pearce has applied the methodology but has taken into account Mr. Crawford's situation of being a peace officer in looking, as she is allowed to do for flexibility. While one might say, well why not this number or why not this number, you have to base it on something factual otherwise the ]70 tenants that were relocated and didn't have special circumstances or numbers that weren't based on factual, then they would be treated unfairly. In my opinion, the rules and regulations that have set forth the Relocation Plan, application and its tethodology are/have been proper and to do anything otherwise, well $100 dollars in differential . rent of what Mr. Crawford's requesting and what the comp bears out may seem insignificant in the short form. It is significant from the stand point that to award it to Mr. Crawford would then treat other tenants unfairly by not giving them the same benefits of changing, adjusting it beyond the methodology established and the comparables that have been established in this case. So, my closing is I dd believe the methodology is proper, its been applied properly, consideration has been given as allowed, to provide any additional consideration I think would be a gift of public funds and not following, not being faithful to the methodology established by the relocation guidelines, as well as this specific Relocation Plan. KB: Mr. Crawford would you like to add anything? JC: Yeah. I would just like to say, I would like to thank each and every one of you for taking your time to hearing my case or um appeal. Um I disagree with Ms. Daniels about being treated fairly. I think there were a lot of variables in the interim between the whole process, the relocation process. Basically, you know I made a statement about price gouging, um, you know I don't have any evidence to prove any of that. I don't think onerous should be on me to prove that. It was brought to Ms. Pearce attention and 1 think um, I'm not asking for um any handouts, whatever the law allows. And if you decide to move to adjust me then that's it, then that the law. But I don't feel that, I have been treated fairly here because that price was what it was at the time. And that's what I presented. Um I can't speak for anyone. else, I could only speak about my issue. And my issue is, is the issue of that, 1 think we are addressing here. Um the other people that may be effected they have to articulate their case to your appeal board that they have • been treated unfairly: I don't feel and I'tn not sure exactly what the law really says in there but it Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford July 10, 2007 • Page 24 of 24 appears to me that it might be um some vagueness its not as clear. [don't know the regulations, I tried reading it, and it was very concluded as far as clarity. If I did try reading that and you know it just runs you around. So no I don't feel that I have been treated fairly I don't believe that the, the effects of the relocation and the entire City was taken into effect especially when there was the tnad rush when everybody was looking for a place. When 1 found Del Mar it was only two anartmPntc availahle Twn hvn-harlrnnme availahl P. nm mma. ihvrv uu~.rr other nlarPC' ac Ms. Daniels has indicated and they were located off of Arrow and that's not were I chose to live. She said that is not the dictate of the Redevelopment Agency that I live where they want me to live because that's cheaper. ['ve in a place because stated both of them stated there were no restrictions where I can move. I moved there and [feel that um the difference of the rent I should be paid. I thank each and every one of you for taking the time to listen to me. KB: Any questions? TH: Just my last questions, um at this time is the project all completed. LD: Yes. The rehab is completed and the occupancies have of qualifying eligible income families. • TH: Beside this case, um, were there other cases or is this the only? LD: We have had' other appeals, some have been approved that dealt with pets and others have been, have not been approved. But this is the only formal hearing that's been applied for. But keep in mind; residents again for the regulations, in order to provide as much opportunity for residents to received relocation benefits if they feel that haven't received was entitled to them have 18-months from the date that they moved to file an appeal. So if you.moved in December of 2006 then you'd actually have till June/July of 2008 to appeal. TH: Ok this question is to the chair, if the Board makes the decision at a later time would Mr. Crawford be present? KB: No. It's the decision of the (Linda, please fill,in) MA: Is there anything you want to add? JC: No. LD: So [can stop the tape? KB: Yes. You may stop the tape. • i . D W N RELOCATION ASSISTANCE APPEAL In the Matter of Mr. Jo/arut}' Cranford and lb1s. dlaquiur A1. Stoval On Mav 16, 2007 at 9: l5 am, a formal relocation assistance entitlement appeal hearing was held at the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("RDA") located at 1000 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The appeal hearing was requested by the residential displacee, Mr. Jolumy N. Crawford and Ms. Maquita M. S[m'al (collectively the "Annellantc"l. a»rl wac rennrctrrl by the Annrllantc Fnllrnvino rhP --::-------------~-o ..._ informal hearing that ti'as held on March 12, 2007, at approximately 1:30 p.m. Appellants resided at 9025 Foothill Boulevard, Apt. E42, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Displacement Property). The Displacement Property has been converted to affordable housing and it was determined that Appellants exceeded the income requirements for the Displacement Property. The Appellants have moved into a replacement property at 7868 Milliken Avenue, Apt. 424, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia (Replacement Property). This appeal hearing is part of the RDA's grievance procedures. Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 25, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6150, et seq. The RDA grievance procedures permit a displacee, who believes they are aggrieved, to request a formal hearing for review and reconsideration of eligibility and/or entitlement. The present appeal hearing was held to determine whether the Appellants' rent differential entitlement was properly based upon $1505.00 per month, not including utilities, instead of $1605.00 per month, not including utilities. Present at the formal hearing were Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director of the RDA, Michael Yoshiba, Special Counsel for the RDA, and Appellant, Mr. Johnny Crawford. All persons and parties were given the opportunity to present testimony, introduce documents, or to submit arty items for review by the appeals treating officer for use in deciding this matter. Standards and criteria used for determining the relocation benefits and allowable expenses were derived from the standards set forth by the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development. California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter G and the RDA's own relocation assistance guidelines. Upon consideration of the testimony at the hearing the writings and other items presented at the relocation appeals hearing the reasons given by the Appellants for requesting review and reconsideration of the claim, the following are my opinions, conclusions and decisions regarding the relocation assistance appeal. I. Factual Backeround The Appellants occupied a 2-bedroom unit at Peppetu'ood Aparnnents. As a result of fne Agency project, the Appellants were required to permanently relocate from their 2-bedroom residential unit. page 2 of 4 • The Appellants qualify for relocation assistance benefits under Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations and [he California Government Code ~ 7260 et seq. Responsibility for the implementation of a relocation assistance program is with the RDA. Execution of the relocation assistance benefits program was delegated to the relocation consultant firm of Pearce Consulting, htc. ("Pearce"). Pearce made the determination and recommendations as to whether the Appellants were eligible for benefits under the relocation assistance program. Pearce determined that the Appellants were fully-tenured occupants and eligible to participate in the relocation assistance nm~ram as "r3isnlatted nersnns" fine ratevnrv of hanefitc available to A.,nan ante „iac a possible "rental differential". California Code of Regulations, Title 25; Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6104. At the hearing, there was no dispute that Appellants had been given a Notice of Eligibility and that their benefits were properly based upon their household size. The Appellants' qualified fora 2-bedroom replacement unit. Pearce based the replacement unit rental rate on comparable replacement units. The initial determination of entitlement was based ttpon a comparable replacement rental rate of $1505.00 per month. u. Did Pearce Properly Determine the Anoellants' Level and Amount of Relocation Assistance Benefits -Replacement Housins Payment for Tenants Rectal Differential . The RDA was provided with a copy oFPearce's file regarding Appellants' relocation benefits. The Appellant stated that they lived in a 2 bedroom, upstairs unit in Pepperwood and that they needed to move to a 2 bedroom unit that was in a safe neighborhood which is why they chose the De] Mar complex. The Appellant stated that he remembered receiving the list of comparable units that were included in the August 3, 2006 letter, but he felt several of the complexes were unsafe. The Appellant indicated that he did not consider any units that were located south of Foothill Boulevard because of security issues. The Appellant stated that the Del Mar complex was identified on a list, provided by Pearce Consulting, of available units in apartment complexes. The Appellant stated that they relocated to a complex that was included on this list because in his opinion it was a safe complex. Subsequent to the meeting the' Appellant faxed the list of apartment complexes that he referred to during the meeting. This fax was received by the RDA on May 16, 2007 and consisted of 2 pages. The Appellant stated that he did not feel that he should have to provide evidence of crime statistics to show that other complexes were not safe. The California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Corrununity Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6104(d)(1)(B) sets forth the relevant procedures for determining comparable rentals for use in the rental differential entitlement determination. Section 6104(d)(1)(B) states: "Comparable Rental. The monthly rental for a comparable replacement dwelling shall be the amount of rent determined by the public entity by one of the methods • page 3 of 4 • described in paragraph 6102(c)(1), considering rental charges instead of listing prices or acquisition costs." California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division I, Chapter 6, Section 6102(c)(1)(A) lists three acceptable methods for determining comparable replacement dwellings: comparative method, schedule method and alternative method. The comparative method is an acceptable method for determining replacement rental races. It appears that Pearce made reasonable efforts to determine replacement rental rates by categorizing the comparable infommation using among other things: bedroom counts. price ranges, location and pet accommodation, in their selection process. III. Conclusion It is my opinion that in this instance there was insufficientjustification, through the testimony of Mr. Crawford, and the Pearce file, to approve an increase in the Appellants' entitlement. The list of apartment complexes that was faxed to the RDA on May 16, 2007 is an excerpt of the Relocation Plan, Section III, which was adopted by the City Council on August 2, 2006. The excerpt identifies the location and rent amounts of apartment complexes that had units to rent at the time the survey (May 1 - ]2, 2006) for the Relocation Plan was prepared. The purpose of the survey, and the list, was to determine if there were an adequate number of rental units available to residents that nmight need to fitmd replacement units. The Appellant could not have relied upon Agency representations in the relocation plan because there were no representations in the relocation plan concering the appropriateness of comparable properties for any displaced persons. If the Appellatit feels that the Director's determination is incorrect or inadequate, he or she may request a formal hearing before a Relocation Appeals Board. To obtain a formal hearing before a Relocation Appeals Board the Appellant must request in writing that the Director schedule such a hearing. Such request shall be made within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of Appellant's written request, he or she will be notified of the fommal hearing dare. If the Appellant requests additional time to prepare material for consideration and shows good cause therefore, the hearing date shall be continued to another date. The Relocation Appeals Board shall have the authority to revise the prior determination of the Diroctor. The Relocation Appeals Board shall, at the time it gives notice of the formal hearing date, notify the Appellant that he or she has the right to be represented by an attorey or others at his or her owtm expense, to present his or her case by oral or documentary evidence; the right to submit oral or documentary evidence; the right to submit rebuttal evidence to conduct such cross examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of facts; and the right to seek judicial review once Appellant has exhausted administrative appeal. The Relocation Appeals Board shall review the formal determination taking into consideration all material upon which the challenged determination was made, all applicable rules and regulations, the reasons given by the Appellant for requesting review, any additional • relevant evidence, oral or documentary, submitted by either the Appellant or the Displacing page 4 of 4 • Agency's representatives. No evidence may be relied upon by the Relocation Appeals Board where the Appellant has been improperly denied an opportunity to rebut evidence or cross- examine awitness. The Relocation Appeals Board shall make its recommendation within six weeks from the date on which the formal hearing is concluded or the date of receipt of the last material submitted, whichever is later. The Relocation Appeals Board's recommendation shall be made in writing and shall contain its recommendation, the factual and legal basis upon which the recommendatinn is made and a statement infnrminv the Annellanf of hie nr hrr rivht in aenk judicial review. The Appellant and the Displacing Agency's governing body shall be promptly served with a copy of the Relocation Appeals Board's recommendation., Upon reviewing the recommendation of the Relocation Appeals Board, the Director shall refer the recommendation to the Agency Board at its next regular meeting and the Agency Board shall thereupon fix a time for considering the matter, which time shall be not less than thirty (30) days from the time the recommendation is delivered to the Agency Board by the Director. On the date thus fixed, or on the date to which the matter shall have been continued, the Agency Board shall proceed to consider the recommendation of the Relocation Appeals Board and shall make and enter on its minutes its final determination therein, which may confirm, modify, or set aside the findings of the Relocation Appeals Board. The Agency Board's determination in the matter shall be final and conclusive. The Displacing Agency shall provide a written determination to the Appellant. • The Appellant shall be deemed to have exhausted his/her administrative remedies upon the Displacing Agency taking action upon his/her appeal or the failure of the Appellant to timely pursue its rights hereunder. Dated: March 31, 2007 /, ,, - , By: ~~"~C~ Lin Executive Director Attachment: August 3, ?006 Letter -Notice of Displacement and Eligibility for Relocation Assistance • ..._ pEARCE COiJSULT,^!G, INC. 347 10th Street, R0. Box 56, Seal Beach. CA 90740 (5621 598-6968 • (562J 598-6998 NO'fTCE OF DISPLACEMENT AND ELiG1BILi`fY FOK RELOCATION ASSISTANCE 1'EPPERWOOll APAR7'NIEN'C ItES1llENTIAL TENANTS RANCHO CUCA~iONGA, CALIFORNIA August 3, 2006 Johnny Crawford & Maquita Stovall 9025 Foothill Bh~d. #E42 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Crawford & Ms. Stovall: On May 1, 2006 LINC-Pepperwood Housing Investors L. P•' ro ect edt welpbe necessary currently occupy to make way for a new affordable housing p j for }'ou to permanently relocate, because it was determined that you and your fanti{y or • other occupants are over income. This is a notice of eligibility for relocation assistance. 'Co carry out the project, it will be necessary for you to relocate. However, you do not need to move until you receive a 90- Day Notice. You will not be required to move without at least 90 days advance written notice of the date by which you must vacate, and when you do move, you will be entitled to relocation payments and other assistance in accordance with State regulations and the California Relocation Assistance Law, California Goverttment Code Section 7260 et esq. (the CRAL") and the California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines; Title 25, Californa Code of Regulations, Chapter 6, Section 6000 et seq. (the "Guidelines") for residential displacement. - The effective date of tlvs notice is August 3, 2006. You are now eligible for relocation assistance, including: Counseling and other Advisory Services. Payment for Movn~g Expenses. Yon may choose either (1) a payment for your actual reasonable moving and related expenses, or (2) if you prefer, a filed moving expense and dislocation allowance of SI 175.00. Replacement Housing Pay!nent. You may be eligible for a repiace.ment housing payment to rent or buy a replacement home. The payment is based on several factors including the . cost of a "comparable replacement hmne;" the monthly renC and average cost of utility services for your present home, and 30 percent of your average =rocs household income. Attached is a list of referrals. yUe would he pleased to provide you with transportation ?o inspect these dwelling uniis. The rent and the estimated average cost of utility services for that unit is $1295.00. Based on the information you have provided about your income, you may be eligible for a rental assistance payment up to a maximum oF$9450.OO. This is the maximum amount you would be eligible to receive. It would be paid in a lump sum or itstallments. If you rent a decent, safe and sanitary home where the monthly renvmen[dwould be based on the our re«la: assi:;t:.^c_ p.-. utility cost are less than $1 LJS.u~> y actual cost of such unit. LAST RESORT HOUSING ASSISTANCE If comparable replacement dwellirgs are not available when you are required to move or if replacement housing is not available within the monetary limits described above, LILAC -Pepperwood Housing Investors L.P. will provide Last Resort Housine assistance to enable you to rent or purchase a replacement dwelling on a timely basis. Last Resort Housing assistance is based on the individual circumstances of the displaced person. Your relocation representative will explain the process for determining whether or not you qualify for Last Resort Housing. Contact us imtnediatel}' if you do not agree that these units aze comparable to your home. . We will explain the basis for our selecting these uniunit that isf not asc mparablel fmd other units. We will not base your payment on any replacement home." Should you choose to buy (rather than rent) a decent, safe and sanitary replacement home, you would be eligible for a down payment of $4,450.00. Let us know if you would prefer to buy a replacement home, and we will help you find such housing. to obtain a replacement housing payment you must move to a decent, safe and sanitary home within one year after you vacate your present home, and [Hake a claim withni l8 months. Therefore, do not commit yourself to rent or buy a unit until we inspect it. l want to n>ske it clear that you are eligible for assistance to help you relocate. Tn addition to relocation payment and housing referrals, counseling and other services are available to }'ou. A representative of this office will soon contact you to determine your needs and preferences. They will explain your rights and help you obtain the relocation payments and other assistance for which you are eligible. If you have any questions, please contact N ilsa Arreola and/m Valerie Fierro; Relocation Consultants, at (909) 476-5974 or in our Seal Beach office at (562) 598-6468. Our on ~~te6 0 ~fice~s located ii Unit A-5. the office hours are "fhiirsday thru Saturday 12:00 p. P • Remember: do not move. before we have a chance to discuss your eligibility for assistance. i Remember: do not move t'ePore ~~-e have a chance to discuss ;'our eligibility t'or assistance. This letter is important to you and should be retained. Sincerely; Beverly S. Pearce . President Pearce Consulting, Inc. 1 received this letter on (Date) Circle one: }{ in person X by U. S. A4ail it was left on my door (Resident sienature) J Pearce Consulting, dnc. 1 Bedroom Referrals 3-3-06 $a7s,oo Rancho Cucamonga - SYNGLE STORY GARDEN APT P[ with d? osit, Six month minimum Unfurnished, Low?r, :bedroom, h=Rich irJaecessibrle,rpoolalllaundry on srt?, stove, micrasrav?, patio, lease, 1-ar Parking available, ~% air conditioner, Paid gas fA garden?r &. pool s?rvice, $875.00 and up, 8383 Fir Dr phone: Leasiny Office a[ (909) 987-8232 Email: _ -- nn Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Flexibl? lease, Parking in Jaded, pool, laundry on site, stove, this large and beautiful 124 unit complex has many ameniti?s, pl?ase call for current prices and available floor plans!, $900.00 5920.00, 9181 Foothill 81vd Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-9363 $930.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, Other (ease type, Parking included, pool, laundry on site, stove, this 224 unit complex has many amenities and prices vary per unit. Call for current availability and Pricing., $930.00 $950.DD, 10244 Arrow Rte Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 980-7235 X990.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX - 708 SQFT Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Ask about lease terms, Covered parking, pool, laundry on • site, quiet neighborhood, stove, microwave, dishwasher, balcony, patio, controlled access building, central air, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, Frost-free refrigerator, kitchenpantry, nine-foot ceilings, walk-in closet, washer and dryer, air conditioning, ceiling fa 990'00 AND Upapartment complex has many amenities and price ranges, call for more info,,, $ 8255 Vineyard Ave #708 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office a[ (909) 989=6363 $1,000.00 . Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX bufldingh[his large and beauBfuh368 u~ t complex!has manylamen'rt es, please calltforl cdurentss prices and available floor plans!, $1,000.00 $1020.00, 9181 Foothill Blvd Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-9363 $1,030.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 1 bedroom, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Flexible lease, pool, stove, dishwasher, patio, washer and dryer hookups, p?t restrictions, this 624 unit complex has many amenities and Prices vary per unit. Call for current availability and Pricing, $1,030 AO and up!, 10400 Arrow Rte Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 545-5588 $1, 040.0 D Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT CO MPL'cX Unfurnished, 2 bedreon-~s, 2 Baths, Cat ot:, Flexible leas=_, Parking Included, pool, laund:~r nn site, sto~:~e, this large and beautiful 384 unit compler. has many arr~enicies, pleas? call for an-r=_nt prices and available floor plans!, $1,040.00 $1050.00, 9151 Foothill Blvd . Phone: Leasing Office at (S09) 985-9353 Pearce Consulting, Ltc. 2 }3cdroom Referrals 8-3-06 §1,oao.oo Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Flexible lease, Parking included, pool, laundry on site, stove, this large and deauti F' 10 0 00 $106Gp00~ Avai able Novelties, please call for currert prices and available floor plans., $_, 9181 Foothill elvd Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-9363 b l,i9~•~~ Rancho Cucamonga -CONDO Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, hlo cats, Parking included, laundry on site, quiet neighborhoo , call for more details, $1,195.OO,Available Now! Call for Address Phone: (626)617-7750 § 1, 250.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT - 987 SQFT Unfurnlshed, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Ask about lease ter atlo, ocentral pairklFl ep ace, washer on site, quiet neighborhood, microwave, dishwasher, balcony, Two Dools, Spa/hot tub, Additional and dryer hookups, Gated entrance, Play9round,Tennis courts, wood-burning fireplaces, outdoor storage, Disposal Hi91,250 001AND UP~!~, Availla IeIlNOwI ns, CozY Oversized patio or balcony, $ 5255 Vineyard Ave #987 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 - § 1, 260.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS TOWNHOUSE • Unfurnlshed, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider Det, One Year minimum lease, Carpe Telnnis Courts, Parking included, pool, laundry on site, quiet neighborhood, stove, dishwasher, Gym, $1,260.00 and up!, Available Now! 10935 Terra Vista Pkwy , Phone: Leasing Office a[ (909) 989-8211 §1,290.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT Unfurnlshed, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider small peta Oneatr wnditioner, washer aand drye~oin Garage parking, pool, stove, dishwasher, yard, balcony, p unit, spa, gym, Larger units start at $1285 and up!' Please call for more Information, $1,290.00 and upl, Available Now! 11343 Mountain View Dr Phone: Manager a[ {909) 941-0408 $1, 300.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS TOWNHOUSE Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 1/2 Ba[atio akea, please call forsan'appointmetlry51,300 00 approx 1100 sgft, includes all appliances, p $1300.00 deposit, Available Now! 8167 Vineyard Ave #12 Phone: Jackie a[ (909) 98?-4131 er.C,1600 $1,310.00 Rancho Cucamonga -GATED COMh7UNITY Unfurnlshed, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Jill consider small pet with deposit, Sixa o,~alir conditio eease, 1-car Parking included, pool, laundry on site, stove, dial) for availabili~v.}Paid gardener & pool central air, central heat, washer and dryer hookups, service, 51,310.00 and up,AvailaGle Now! 9493 Etiwanda Ave • Phone: Lea=_ing Office at (909) 8°.9-2631 Email: y ~aliilLa i~~^oronPrfi°s com Pearce Consulting, Inc. 2 Bedroom Referrals • 3-3-06 51,330.00 Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT > masher and Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, ~N/III consider pet, One ~/atio central a ~~ f ~eplac pe~ Floor, Parking Included, pool, s[eve, dishwasher, yard, balcony, D dryer In unit, tennis courts and spa, 6 different floor plans, call for more details!, 51,330.00, and up! deposit, ]on3 F.Im Ave Phone: Leasing Office at (guy) y6v-%~~~ $1, 350.00 Rancho Cucamonga -WONDERFUL 2+2 TOWNHOME IN RANCHO CU CAMON Unfurnished, End, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Will consider small pet with deposit, One Year minimum lease, Carpet Floors, 2-car Garage parking, pooi, quiet neighborhood, stove, dishwasher, balcony, central.air, central heat, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, Available in mid-August is this beau[Iful 2 bedroom 2 bath 10D16F two-story townhome in the hleadowood Village community in restauaant,f& transportation convelnlen eis are~Meadowood Village complexhs In tself asbea PCi 91 complex in a park set[Ing with huge green areas, tot lots, basketball courts; tennis courts, & swimming pools. The entire complex has just recently been painted [o glue it that fresh look. This comes with newer paintanewer neu [al co owed carpe gals st vePld'shwasheres& disposal There is also a large balcony right outside of the living room for you [o chill out after work. ]ust bring your bags and move right in. Tenant is In tardenee& assoaatlon fees,n$1,350.00, 2000 deposit,l Available than 8/12/06., Pald water & trash & g 8/15/06 • 10245 Chaparral Way #E Phone: Jeff at (323) 256-0248 Fax: 323 316 9616 Email: iC~48_Ca'.gar-~link nit $1, 3 60.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, WIII consider 360 00 $1430 00, Available Nowling included, pool, quiet neighborhood, refrigerator, stove, $1, 10650 Church St Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 476-6800 • Pearce Consulting, Inc. 2 Bedroom Referrals 8-1-06 $l,zso.oo Rancho Cucamonga -SPACIOUS APARTMENT - 987 SQFT Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, Cat ok, Psk about lease ter aCio,O entral afro, 1fireppace, was her on site, quiet neighborhood, microwave, dishwasher, balcony, p and dryer hookups, Gated entrance, playground, Tennis courts, Tv:o pools, Spa/hot tub, Additional outdoor storage, Disposal „151,250 OOIAND Upaly wan llahlellNowans, Cozy wood-burning fireplaces, Oversized patio or balcony, _ 8255 Vineyard Ave ~yoi S:z F phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 ;1,285.00 Rancho Cucamonga -APARTMENT COMPLEX- 675 SQ FT Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 1 Bath, Cat ok, Ask about lease terms, Covered parking, Dool, laundry on site, quiet neighborhood, stove, microwave, dishes eihesMCtions, hIs1262 unit (complex habuma'ny central air, fireplace, washer and dryer hookups, P Playground, Tennis courts, Tv+o pools, Spa/hot amenities and prices vary per unit, Gated entrance, tub, Additional outdoor storage, Disposal High- P ededvlater & trash,) $1,2 Se00 AND UPI Available burning fireplaces, Oversized patio or balcony, Nowl 8255 Vineyard Ave #875 SQ FT Phone: Leasing Office at (909) 989-6363 $1,550.00 Rancho Cucamonga -BRAND NEW APARTMENT Unfurnished, 2 bedrooms, 2 Baths, WiII consider small pet with deposit, Flexible,lease, New Carpets, • 1-car Garage parking, wheelchair accessible, pool, quiet neighborhood, refrigerator, stove: microwave, dishwasher, controlled access building, central air, central heat, washer and dryer in unit, Everything is brand new. This is a completely brand new building and you will be the first phesNew VIC[orlatGardentMalDls dose to theal0, 210, alnd tldie 15 Freeways. h51e550t'00, 400Y00 OAC deposit, Available Now! 8200 Haven Ave Phone: (909) 941-6620 ~,le~ P rw Wit, o-~ ~~ ~.. a-~o~o . --r - ~ ~-°--.---- • ----- ~ ~--- 2 h?~. U n Sf~-0 cv~, ~R.r1~}'Wab cC ~ ~. heel U rJ S {Zwio lug ~ZQ ~~ 4d-1rc0 ~1~'e.~Q.., ort ~~ YltC`a, , Mn . . CY'O~ ~'~rQ 11X10 vt.6t }~P~l ~ U wul(.e.0., e~ o ~ .Obvl 'V,~(St..,C,~•{(j.r~„ V Vt,t.~%J ~~ ~D'Df ~u.~Q- • llX~t2 V~.b'~' ~Q3~.-~ wl. (Y~C~-l/lf~ r~ l12(.(~,tl~.(a (,g~C,t?O. eta, /IQ.Q.0C6t~'Ibrt.. G0*tiJ. GQ.IGl y1~ ~Q~ ~.a. Q~t.Q.d_ ~1.~ 1;t,yP,~Q ' I ~'V`' VL~J~ CC.~'6it.~' ..~.t,~ Q.k-6x~.d. a.~it.A.uf~ -~o ~(7v L'di- O1J L ~-wGQi d~ C~~' ~7FLt~,O ~ Q.~c . ~1Lc-s~feh TQ.~.o~ PrOVI`G~ed(-,~Q~_~ca4' ~ ~ - -1'k,to l.u'+zo ~ ~ ~ ~-~'~-1,o iuUn, f arm~aii vr~ -- - G - G'IUt I~t~ vt,o~ C.anc~J ~~~~ ~. 11M, C.r'Cx.u~-~'ofcl reme,u.i~,,o~~~c.~, -}ftie, ~' 3~ f.e~-X • ~ -~ ~ ~ ,Q.t,ti.~'o ,a~~- ~dux~1, a.~.a.~ c~ ~ . o b S - 3 ~ ~ ` . ~ ~ e ~ ~. H-e ~ C~ ccsp~. ~ -I~e, P,~.f' ~ w cu.. ~- ~.-E~e. w ~:e.2 ~9~..c.~- ~~f c~- Car~ u-w<.f' ca.Qc. - -fin. /term-l~~v -~a~- ~ 5 ~ ~~ ~ ° ~ ~,~Pa -}s2.d. -11~a~ i ~ ~, uJa.~t2d (R,(~.v~n ~~.:.r~.c ~c=i-l~~Il.a(~, i1•C~YI `t11A..~ ~LQ. I.LJ'Olt,(LGL~ -~.a.~~ -40 ~.Q, G.n ~.pe~.Q . k~ c4..~.d r,.s-t ~;sct,vr~ ..R~;a co,a.cern,a ~~' a4f~vr ,un.~ Q,~.. ~.a fem. ~ ~ a~f' ~.uvwt,o ate ~,~.,~,.e~.~-~,.~, n.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Pep~rwoo~ uxv~ cf.o~c.nav -~2~ ~~~~ Yk~ • ~-~~ ,oc~ -l-Gta~- P2~rc~ wzto a~_. ~ .Bte...n . F'CQ.t' -FG.c,y Q,t-i~+i~' {cstm,.J -i-{,~a- a-t¢s~-. ~ ~ ~-~ . ~.~-e.d. 9 ~~ ~Fo ern. i (''~ Section III `_ ~ ~ C'~~ Study of Available Housing received 5 • Ilo• o~ 2 des Exces^pt of K2l0.rii#t on Plat') Should displacements take place, replacement housing shall be provided to all permanently displaced residents which are "comparable". Replacement housing shall be decent, safe and sanitary; adequate in size to accommodate the occuoants anri w~~h;,, ,ti„ ,:.,..__:_, __ dIS laced - ,........ ..._ ...,°"~,~~ UiceY~S Ui [he residential comparable units shall beegivensto res dentslan la bi-weekly report. The units shall be comparable with respect to the number of rooms, habitable space, and type and quality of construction. Comparability shall be a compromise between the present features of the dwelling, however, it shall not require strict adherence to a detailed, item by item comparison. The area shall not be subjected to environmental problems and shall not be less desirable than the location of the present dwelling. i During the week of May 1 through 12, 2006 a survey of all available units within the area was carried out utilizing the above descriptions, in a desire to assess the reasonableness of causing such displacements as may be necessary to carry out the project to a positive conclusion. The survey utilized local newspaper, as well as local property management firms, and windshield analysis of the area, as its resources. Table 3 -Replacement Housing Survey Results T'd 8b88LLb ~Ol b£6b~8b606T SI JdJ31NS 1H9IaNti3~J ~WOad 8S~60 LOC~2-9ti-hdW l.ri+OW~n' CJ $1150 11210 4 Street 909 980-1493 $1185 7951 Etiwanda Ave. 909 463-4640 $1185 7591 Etiwanda Ave. 909 463-4640 Two Bedroom $970 8837 North Grove Ave. 909 981-8121 $1000 9181 Foothill Blvd. 909 989-9363 $1035 8837 North Grove Ave. 909 961-8121 $1040 $1180 9181 Foothill Blvd. 8493 Etiwanda Ave. (909) 989-9363 866 338-5396 $1200 8167 Vine and Ave. 909 981-1431 X263 $1210 8950 Arrow Route 866 338-5421 $1260 10935 Terra Vista Parkwa 909 989-8211 $1275 10151 Arrow Route #70 909 981-4131 $1290 11343 Mountain View Drive 909 941-0408 $1300 8785 Knollwood Drive 909 981131 #229 $1300 8493 Etiwanda Ave. 866 338-5396 $1310 8493 Etiwanda Ave. 866 338-5396 $1330 7903 Elm Ave. 909 980-7368 $1335 10400 Arrow Route 909 945-5588 $1340 8950 Arrow Route 866 338-5421 $1360 10850 Church Street 909 476-6800 $1375 7661 Haven Avenue 323 401-5980 $1418 9200 Milliken Avenue 909 980-8050 There were over forty (40) decent safe and sanitary, comparable, and available units for rent within the immediately area of the project during a one week period of time from May 1 to May 8, 2006. The conclusion of this survey is that adequate available replacement housing will be available during the life (August 3, 2006 through January 1, 2007) of the referenced relocation project in order to house any necessary residents. LJ z'd 8682LLb ~01 b£66CBb606L SI Jda31N3 1H9I2JNti3~~~WOL+d 8560 L062-9T-1.HW -~ D W W Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford • May 16, 2007 Page 1 of 15 JOHNNY CRAW FORD RELOCATION HEARING TRANSCRIPT Redevelopment Agency Conference Room May 16, 2007 - y:15 a.m. ...And present at this formal Appeal Hearing is Linda Daniels (LD), Redevelopment Director; Michael Yoshiba (MY) with the Law Office of Richards, Watson and Gershon,... Johnny Crawford (JC). LD: Okay,... I had your packet from the previous time that we met. And is there, just for • Michael's benefit and for the tape that we're doing, is there, could you just describe or briefly explain your request for the additional compensation that you are seeking? JC: Okay. Well, I think it's very straight forward. You guys hired the company, I don't remember the name of the company,... LD: Pierce Consulting? JC: Pierce Consulting to,... as your contractor to relocate us. They gave us a list of places in which we can move. To my understanding there was no restriction as far as, you know, do we have to move in on Fourth Street or up here. There was a list, and we chose an apartment off of that list, an upstairs apartment. And, as I explained to you in your letter, soon as they found out that Silverwood was being impacted, everybody raised their rent. Everyone in the area raised their rent. And so, I along with a whole lot of other people, chose to move at Del Mar, and if there was no restrictions on where l . could move, or any of the other tenants, then I really don't see what the issue is because this is what the rent was. The difference between what I was paying - I moved into a two (2) bedroom, upstairs apartment, just like I had. And I followed the advice of Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford May 16, 2007 • Page 2 of 15 your consultant that that was one of the places that was selected to move to. So, I'm not sure why I'm not being allowed,... given the additional benefits because that's one of the places that was recommended by your consultants; the Redevelopment Agency consultant. Hnd, i think was a pretty shut and divide issue, i mean we, you know, came in here and I spoke with you in regards some of the other areas and as you know some of the areas are less desirable than some. But that really shouldn't have even been my argument. My argument should have been just straight forward this is one of the places that you selected, that you- put on the list, and I chose to move there. So, if Del Mar wasn't one of them, and there was restrictions to where you can move then your consultant should have said, "Well you can't move there." But they did not say that, they encouraged us to move there, and you have several residents from Pepperwood that moved there. Some of the buildings are older than some; the one that I happened to move in were one of the newer buildings. And luckily because they're not the best place either. LD: I just trying to take notes,... even though it's tape recorded (I'd like to take notes - ? ). Did you look at any of the other complexes that were provided to you? And I think that in the first hearing we talked about the list that was provided at the meeting was intended to identify all units but you were given a comparable unit list on,... dated August 3rd (third) that identified specific units that were available for rent. Did you look at any units other than Del Mar? MC: Yes, we looked at some units off of Vineyard. I think that they were Lewis Homes as well. And, other than that, I'll be quite truthful with you, I did not look at any of the units south of Foothill Boulevard. As I explained to you, I didn't think that you would • want to live over there. And you have to consider where you live. You just don't move into an area because the rent's cheap. I don't think you would do that, (and) I don't think you would do that. You would move were you think provides the best security for you Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford • May 16, 2007 Page 3 of 15 especially in the line of work that I do. And for me that had, that has to be a consideration. And Pepperwood really was' okay when we moved there, and then the elements started changing. So, we were planning on moving out of there anyway. You see the beer cans in the parKing lot, and that kind of stuff. You don't,.. For me, I don't want to be around that. And so I have to consider where I move. I'm not going to be in law enforcement and live amongst potential people that might be selling drugs, you know. The places that are south of Foothill Boulevard, that element is there. But only shouldn't be on me to prove. I mean, if you get, the,... if you guys go at your demographics and look at where your arrests are occur at, that's, it'll show in that particular area. But that's not the issue. The issue tome is: Was Del Mar on your list? And it was. I moved where you said I could move. That's,... And you didn't specify that had to move at any other place. You said here are the lists. You can move at any one of these that you want. And Del Mar is on your list(s). So if there was some restrictions, as far as where I could move, then, then,... that should have been brought to our attention or explained. We have,... The other thing is that I must bring to your attention and I think I highlighted in the letter I sent you, the consultant company did not know this area. Because the,... they went out and did a survey at least three (3) times. I pretty sure you are aware of that, right? LD: (We - ?)They would do them on a weekly basis. MC: Well, they weren't going to do them until we had a meeting at City Hall and complained to you guys in regards to where they were going and how low-ball, the low- ball figures that the came up with. And in my opinion they never did get it right. Rent's not cheap out here in Rancho. If you're going to live in a(n) okay area. It's not cheap here. And unfortunately for me, I happen to be in and apartment,... I haven't lived in an apartment for years. But, you know, a divorce will, a divorce will cause you to (be) get . reestablished again. So, this is a temporary thing for me. But, you know, (I) still have to watch were I live. But, there were no restrictions as far to where we could move, (even) where people encouraged us to, to,... I felt like that (even) applied to the house that we Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford May 16, 2007 Page 4 of 15 wanted to buy, which would have been a lot more expensive. But, you know, that (as) where the market was we weren't going to do (but,) that was part of (your) the plan as well to give you assistance as far as buying a house. I could have chose to do that but now at the time of the market being the was that it is f chose to live in an area that I thought provide me with some degree of security. And,... LD: Talk to me about the (lot) of at the last time that we met, have you looked at security, and have you, do you have any information?.... MC: Now, I don't think that should be on me. You guys impacted me. And you're the Redevelopment Agency; you have access to (???), I don't, and when it's tallied, you can simply call into the Police Department and ask for the information. (Like) I should not be • a determination of whether I receive benefits. The issue here and is, did you impact me. Did, you, did you provide me with a list to move to, and Del Mar was on it. So, if you did not want me to move to Del Mar, you should not have put,... your people should not have said, "(Now) Hey, here's one of the place you can move." MY: (On the face of the to move As part of the list was there,... Did you receive any other documentation and notice of eligibility, explanation from the Pierce Consulting folks regarding the program at all? JC:... MY: I understand you did receive some of that documentation. JC: We received some documentation, and a matter of fact, I don't believe I ever got the list from Pierce Consulting. I got it from one of the other tenants.... Said, "Well here's a • list of apartments." So, I don't believe I ever got the list from Pierce Consulting. But, but I have the list and I can tell you who provided me the list was Christian (Kristen - ?) Taylor; she's the one that provided me with the list. But, and then I contacted Jan Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford May 16, 2007 Page 5 of 15 Reynolds. She emailed me the list. I still have that email. So, it was definitely, I mean, Del Mar was definitely on it. So, I'm at a loss as to why we (are) even having this discussion, as far as should I be entitled, when the Redevelopment Agency contracted tierce consulting,... And I'm repeating myself again. taut I want to hammer this point across. They were on your list. And if they didn't want us to move there they should've said so. They, they,... you know, they approved it. You know that, right? They approved it. We had to take it to them, and they had to approve it. MY: I know: We're just trying to get the document,... the information correct for you. Is this one of the documents in this August third, 2006, letter? It appears to be addressed to you? • JC: Let's see... Reviewing documentation MY: I just want to (look at?) the progressive,... (side here/sire - ?) Reviewing documentation JC: Well, we brought this to the attention, that the amount .that they had here was absolutely (only sure/home nature/home they sure - ?)...., Reviewing documentation MY: But,... The reason I bring that, it, it, (indecipherable)... It appears that it may have been attached to that or something,... been included with that. Stated the same as that August the third, 2006. Reviewing' documentation Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford • May 16, 2007 Page 6 of 15 JC: I vaguely remember this. I will say that I do remember seeing this. And this is one of the things that was brought to their attention. That these prices were not accurate. It ... _. was orougne to tneir attention at tna[ ume. i ao remember seeing tnis. MY: Was this the list that you were referring to? JC: I'm not,... I don't see,... Well, let me tell you right now. (I'm/Un-) safe. (I/And) don't know where that's at. It was to look at all of these places (and/that) they're south of Foothill Boulevard. It's not a safe place to live. I not sure of on Mountain,... (indecipherable)... • Reviewing documentation: JC: Now this was one of them that,... Reviewing documentation I believe this is,... This is one of Lewis'. We looked at this, and they, like I said, they were sold out. Now, there's another list besides (indecipherable)... because Del Mar is clearly on there. Let's see,... MY: So the list that you refer to is something similar to this one? JC: Yes. MY: Thanks. LD: Undecipherable)... (You have to) review that still? MC: I'm pretty sure I can (indecipherable)... • MC: (Now/I mean that) This is were I live. It's right over here; it's just right around the corner. It's (probably/part of) Del Mar. (Looks like/) Church and Elm. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford • May 16, 2007 Page 7 of 15 MY: (Indecipherable)... The list that you, that you refer to earlier was a supplement to this list or at least appears to be,...? JC: Yah. It (That) has to be because Del Mar is clearly one of the apartments that was on there. That's on the,... That's (why/how) I went there. There,.. That was definitely on the (they're/other) list. I could look through/in my folder, and my file (rndecipherable)...that Ihave and fax it to you. MY: That'd be great. Thank you. • JC: But,... You do know that Pierce approved were we moved. They had to approve it. LD: They are required to make sure it's safe and,.... (indecipherable)... JC: They came over and inspected it,... LD: (But) That doesn't mean that they're approving the rent (Indecipherable)... JC: Then how come did they come over and inspect it,...? LD: Because they are required to,... JC: ,... (and) we had to sign the paperwork? And, they said, "Yah, it meets the/your standards. • LD: (Because) They're required to inspect it to make sure you move into a safe and sanitary (environment/re-...?) Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford May 16, 2007 • Page 8 of 15 JC: Safe and sanitary ("sanitory'"). That's a key word. I like you said that. Safe and "sanitory," sanitary. Okay. They approved that then. LD: Agreement. JC: Well, they definitely did. They signed off on it before I could get a check. They came out (and) inspected it. MY: (Yah) That's actually one of the,... JC: Considered it a safe and sanitory, sanitary. MY: (That's actually one of the,...) That's a,... one of the legal requirements. JC: Okay. LD: (indecipherable)...(Okay, we're getting into an over -lay/-lap.) JC: I, I take that as approval. We might want to spin words but it,... They came over checked to made sure it was safe. Check all the closets, everything,... garage. LD: Right. (And) They're required to do that for all the tenants. That's probably what they did. (indecipherable)... JC: And they knew what the rent was,... (?) • LD: On August first, when you met with them they did a comp study, a comp; and they identified,... And they actually, because of your request to,... because of your guns and what you have,...they you'd, that you be calculated on a home (indecipherable)... rather Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford . May 16, 2007 Page 9 of 15 than an apartment that you have (indecipherable)... (based) on our requirement. And on August first,... this was prepared and it identified your existing rent after (indecipherable)...(the rent) at the time and then your,... the rent as far as based on cost is ~ i 5u5.uu, Then the rent that you re you were looking at, a (indecipherable)...(comparable) unit, being mathematically calculated in the differential. Do you recall, you, you, (indecipherable)...(marked an assignment),... Do you recall this being reviewed with you? JC: Yes, I did. And what was Mrs. Pierce said, that well, this is all that I can do right now and you will have to appeal to the housing for the difference. That this is all I can do. LD: Okay. JC: So,... and, that's why we're here. LD: Okay. JC: You know,... We could have stayed there and protested this (indecipherable)... but, you know, why? When all of the other apartments were being taken by everybody. We need to find something, you know, get out of there. LD: Okay. JC: So she did bring this to our attention, and she said that we would have to do,... go through this, here, process. And (But), she also lead us, lead me to believe that there wasn't going to be this extensive,... You know, you know, we're going to have all these different types of hearings. (Indecipherable)... (Etc. etc.,...) She did tell us that after we • moved we'd get the appeal form and which we did get it, and submitted it, but,... LD: Did you talk to her at all about Del Mar at the time,...? Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford May 16, 2007 • Page 10 of 15 JC: Sure.... LD:...,anu iiie oiher uniis JC: Sure, sure... They know what was going,... LD: And the other units you didn't feel were what you,... would satisfy, you needs? JC:...No. I didn't discuss that with her because those where not your (our) instructions. Your instructions from them was to go out and find a place, and that's what we did. As far as the discussion with them, in regards to what we thouaht was safe or not safe- (indecipherable)... was really left up to us, or,... You know, I'm not going to have someone tell me I have to move over here (and) I don't think it's safe. So, they did not advise us on (along) that line. What we did bring to their attention, we, (indecipherable)......,(seemed lean/mean),... A lot of the places that they were on that list the you provided me, you won't live there. I don't know where you live, but you won't live there. There's just a certain element of society you don't want to live around,.and I don't believe that you would want to live there. (Indecipherable)... Iwon't expect that Pierce Consulting should expect me to live (there), what I consider, perhaps as undesirable. I moved where I thought was,... What I said, Del Mar is on that list. And if don't have it, you can ask them for it. They have it. They know that Del Mar is on there. There's about twenty-eight residents from Pepperwood that moved there. And we have (Indecipherable)... from them. So, they added new places along the way. (Indecipherable)... (Not just those) from the beginning. LD: Right, it's... Again, it's become available, they update it so it helps the tenant who • need to be looking focused on units that have availability. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford • May 16, 2007 Page 11 of 15 JC:... (Right,) And as I, and as I explained to you we,... this apartment, had I moved over there, maybe a month earlier, was not even $1500.00. They, they started gouging everybody. All the rents went up. So, everything that they did initially was not important. Lause everybody went up. Hnd we toil the man, and thats wny they kept going at (indeciplferable)...That's what is was right there, probably the very beginning because I was not the actually price of any other apartment, even in the undesirable (indecipherable)... (lending/area). You can't get an apartment over here, no where, not even over there, for under 1500 bucks ($1500.00). But you can, one bedroom. (tirdecipherable)... and I, we look at some apartments the other day, right there on 4th Street. And they start at 19 ($1900.00),; two bedrooms. MY: Was Pierce available for you to inquire, (regarding) if you have any question or any issue,...? JC: They don't know the area. (Indecipherable)... (I brought that,...) They do not know the area. I brought that to your attention in the letter. They do not know the area, and did not know the area. (You know that) Some of the tenants,... LD: In what way? JC: It was weird,... They did not know what the pricing in the area was....Where the apartments were really located. I don't believe, I don't believe Del Mar was initially on their list. That's how some of the tenants brought it back to their attention that, "Hey!... You know, that's a nice place." And the places that they were sending us, south of Foothill, who wants to live over there? MY: Where they available for consultation on the, the relocation program or . (indecipherable)... benefits that they have? Would they, did they make themselves available to you? Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford • May 16, 2007 Page 12 of 15 JC: It was always someone in the office. It was always someone there,... I can't think of the lady's name. I would say that in the very beginning there was a lot of misinformation. I believe that's in there (the) City's record at the town hall meeting. You know, you were given false information; straight out lies. Hnd (youj can't remember them ail, but (ifj ivis. Daniels looking through the Minutes from that town hall meeting you would, you would,... there is written documentation, perhaps a level of incompetency (incompetence) in the way it was handled. Because I know because I was at .the meeting. And, well I got there at the end but, I do know that a lot of these issues was brought to the City's attention. And, that's when, I think Jan Reynolds, was very helpful. She offered telephone assistance, should I say. Because I know that I spoke with Jan (at) several times. • And, now, I just want to put on the record, I'm not asking for any money that I'm not entitled to. I mean, I was impacted. I moved into an apartment that, like I said, that they advised us we could move in. And that really should be the issue. LD: Can you fax over that list? JC: Do you what? You should be able to get that from Pierce. Pierce has that list. They have every list that they gave us. I'm pretty sure that I have it because I have a folder. But Pierce, Pierce has it. LD: Do you know the date? JC: No, I don't. I mean, we're talking, a year, a year or so ago. A little over a year. LD: But I won't know if the list is the list you're thinking of,... If you don't fax it to me... ~J MY: Just to be, you know, so that it's..'. (indecipherable)... Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford . May 16, 2007 Page 13 of 15 JC: Yah, I'll look and see if I have the one with (of) Del Mar upon it. Because I remember seeing Del Mar. Lu: Because i Thought That when we talked at our iasi meeting, the list that you were describing, was the one with the relocation plan, which was all apartments in the City and not,... (i,rdeeiplrerable)...in adifferent... JC: Well, I'm not, I'm not sure which list then, I'm talking about. Because I khow that Del Mar was on a list. LD: And I thought we had concluded, in the last meeting, that Del Mar, along with several other apartments were on the list, and that was a list developed from the • relocation plan purposes and was not a list that's intended to identify available units in our inventory. JC: (No)I -don't remember discussing that. We had,... LD: So, if you would fax me over,...? JC: Not, not in details as you just explained it. I don't remember that. MY: (Indecipherable)... JC: Now, all I know is that Del Mar was on the list. Now, as to what list that was, it was a list that was presented to us either from Pierce or maybe from Jan I don't remember from who I got it from, to tell you the truth. • DL: Well, if you could fax it to me that will (indecipherable)... JC: I'll see if I have it. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford May 16, 2007 • Page 14 of 15 DL: I'll give you my card with the fax number on it. JC,: 'rah,... DL: And, if possible, if I could have it by Monday (?...). JC: You'll have it today. DL: Okay. Very good. JC: (indecipherable)... Because I don't want to go over it (indecipherable)...desk (?),... And if I don't have it, I will let you know. (Because) I have everything,... I've been putting everything on file (?). DL: That would be great. JC: But if I don't have it, I'm certain that if you call Beverly because I know they have it. DL: But then again I won't know if it the one that you... JC: If Del Mars on it then it's the on I'm talking about. DL: The old one. Why don't you see if you have it? JC: Right, right... • DL: And you have no pet. I think you covered it. JC: I have no pet. Relocation Assistance Appeal Hearing Transcript Johnny Crawford May 16, 2007 Page 15 of 15 DL: (Ltdecipherable)... MY: (lndecipherable)...question,... Do you have anything else to add or,...? Obviously, (indecipherable)...you need your (indecipherable)... (clear?) JC: Yah,... I just want to be treated fairly and whatever I'm entitled to (move along). And, I don't want to really waste you guys time anymore. And, so hopefully this will be the last time that we meet on this issue. LD: Okay,... • JC: Alright great,... (indecipherable)... LD: (indecipherable)... (We will work it out - ?) JC: I'm glad that I got here early. I thought, I thought it was 9:30. LD: And just for the record,... JC:...,Thank you. LD: And just for the record we're concluding at about 9:40 AM. --~ . . a ~' RELOCATION' ASSISTANCE APPEAL /n the Tatter ofAlr. Jo/loop _N". Crtrnfard raid illttgrrita R/. Stovnl On March 12; 2007, at approximatel}~ 1 :30 p.m., a relocation assistance entitlement appeal hearinu vas held of the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("RDA") located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga; California. The appeal hearing was requested by the residential displacee, Mr. Johnny N. Crawford and Maquita M. Stoval (collectively the "Appellants"). n ... ,.11 .._.,.. ,.:a_a _i. nn~c r, .. ,,.6:11 o,,.. i,,.....-,l A.. C.1 ^I D~.,..h.. !`„~ ............. (`.,li fn.,.:n (Displacement Property). The Displacement Property has been convened to affordable housing and it was determined that Appellants exceeded the income requirements for the Displacement Property. The Appellants have moved into a replacement property at 7868 Milliken Avenue, Apt. 424, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Replacement Property). This appeal hearing is part of the RDA's grievance procedures. California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6150, et seq. The RDA ~-ievance procedures permit a displacee, who believes they are.aggrieved, to request a hearing for review and reconsideration of eligibility and/or entitlement. The present appeal hearing was held to determine whether the Appellants' rent differential entitlement was properly based upon $ 1 X05.00 per month, not including utilities, instead of S 1605.00 per mouth, not including utilities. Present at the hearing were Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director of the RDA, Regina Danner. Special Counsel for the RDA, and Appellant, Mr. Johnny Crawford. All persons and parties were given the opportunity to present testimony, introduce documents, or to submit any items for review by the appeals hearing officer for use in deciding this matter. Standards and criteria used for determining the relocation benefits and allowable expenses were derived from the standards set forth by the State of California, Department of Housing and Conununity Development California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6 and the RDA's own relocation assistance guidelines. Upon consideration of the testimony at the hearing, the writings and other items presented at the relocation appeals hearing, the reasons given by the claimant for requesting review and reconsideration of the claim; the following. are my opinions, conclusions and decisions regarding the relocation assistance appeal. 1. Factual Backn~round The Appellants occupied a 2-bedroom unit at Peppenvood AparUuents. As a result of the Agency project, the Appellants are required to permanently relocate from their 2-bedroom residential trait. page 2 of 3 The Appellants qualify for relocation assistance benefits under Tide 25 of the California Code of Regulations and the California Government Code X7260 et seq. Responsibility for the implementation of a relocation assistance program is with the RDA. Execution of the relocation assistance benefits prog~am was delegated to the relocation consultant firm of Pearce Consulting, Inc. ("Pearce"). Pearce made the determination and recommendations as to whether the Appellants were eligible for benefits under the relocation assistance program. Pearce determined that the Appellants were fully-tenured occupants and eligible to pariicipa[e in the relocation assistance i7rvgraiii da ~ uiain ui,cu i~ci oJLo ~. v ., w .,S"'~ ...,., ~ .. ........ .. ... ..NI" ,....., ,. .... .. possible 'Mental differenliaP'. California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6104. At the hearing, there was no dispute that Appellants had been given a Notice of Eligibility and that their benefits were properly based upon their household size. The Appellants' qualified fora 2-bedroom replacement unit. Pearce based the replacement unit rental rate on comparable replacement units. The initial determination of entitlement was based upon a comparable replacement rental rate of $1505.00 per month. II. Did Pearce Properh~ Determine the Appellants' Level and Amount of Relocation Assistance Benefits - Reniacement Housing Pavmeat for Tenants Rental Differential The RDA was provided with a copy of Pearce's file regarding Appellants' relocation benefits. Appellant testified that in his professional opinion, as a law enforcement officer, the rental complexes that were provided by Pearce as comparable units were not safe. Mr. Crawford stated that he drove to some of the complexes that . were identified as being comparable by Pearce and based on his visual inspection from the street he rejected further consideration of them because they did not provide the proper level of safety and securitythat he wanted. The California Code of Regulations; Title 2~; Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6104(d)(1)(B) sets forth the relevant procedures for determining comparable rentals for use in the rental differential entitlement determination. Section 6104(d)(1)(B) states: "Comparable Rental. The monthly rental for a comparable replacement dwelling shall be the amount of rent determined by the public entity by one of the methods described in paragraph 6102(c)(1); considering rental charges instead of listing prices or acquisition costs." California Code of Regulations; Title 2~, Housing and Community Development, Division 1, Chapter 6, Section 6102(c)(1)(A) lists three acceptable methods for detenminins comparable replacement dwellings: comparative method, schedule method and alternative method. The comparative method is an acceptable method for page 3 of 3 detem~ining replacement rental rates. It appears that Pearce made reasonable efforts to detern~ine replacement rental rates by categonzmg the comparable information using among other things: bedroom counts, price ranges, location and pet accommodation, in their selection process. lll. Conclusion It is my opinion that in this instance there ~~~as insufficientjustification, tluough a,.., ro~~;.,,...,,, ,;c nn.- r..,,..,r ..;i .,.,,t ~t,o ne.,..,.e sto ~,....,.,.-,..,o a,~ n.,.,en.,,,~~~ ...~ ..............~ ..... _.. ....... ..,............._ ~ .,~..,., _.._, ..., _i. ~,.., . _ ..._ ..r, ~. _......... entitlement. The Appellant provided no factual data or information regarding crime statistics or information to show that the comparable units had greater levels of crime than Pepperwood Apartments, to support the claim that the comparable units should not have been used to determine the rent differential. The Appellants' appeal for a recalculation of their entitlement based upon the comparable replacement rental rate of $1505.00 is denied. ff Che Appellants are mot satis5ed with this determination, they can request, in writing, a formal review and reconsideration. This request can be made at any time within 18 months following the later of (a) the date he/she moves from the property, or (b) the date he/she received final compensaCion for their relocation benefits. The request for a fornial review and reconsideration may inc]ude any statement~of fact within their la~owledge or belief, or any other material, which they believe may have bearing on their appeal. The Appellants have the right Co be represented by an attorney, to present his/her case by oral or documentary,evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence and to conduct cross- examination as maybe required. Further, the Appellants have the right to seekjudicial review of the opinions and conclusions rendered in this matter, once they have exhausted the administrative appeal process. Dated: March 22, X007 Li Ada Daniels, Executive Director i C!-aa~ tn-fo ~ -fad's yac~ wed' ~eme~ -ip 21a.Daora_tn~ ovi. why coo yov -Feet yav ~rnti.QQ recec`ve add'f ~ -w~( is it G-p~opria~. ~y ob -}~iw-rte .-; .~~ '~~~ ~; ~ ~ ~, i. rn or! ey n ~~ a-ve~'a22 Qt;~e. ti ~y ~;+~a~ +~ce. ~. ltd a.~' ~ ~o~ id-~. - 2s-~e~~ v~ pr ~ n~~, cex.cevh ~~~~ '~~rc~ e,~plru,-, ~ncorn~ ~ a. -f~.ct~r - (z -~,.,.~ ~. Ioc.s..e~rfY-re~a~,~ca.» 6~ ~ +~- a.an.. a.u~a.c:laJ~2~) ~Q.t efh.ox G~nc.~.ea u9e% r~ a~ - n.o dafu- -Eo ~-e.~~ -~o,~.~ 1.~~ ,CA.,µ,AB.~?~ . ~ Je C u r i -{-~,~ v~ *~ 1,,, -~ lam, . U~j~¢,- . ~Gb~XI' f Q/~-~ Oitlt~ ~t/~ YYL(~lrl C~1.i,1TJ~.l.'tu ~r+ vLrt WA,~~ -fv r2 u~ o-f{iev (ew.~eo ~D cd ,~ ~ .k~.e~ 9naeC. -b Prav fd~ (nfoYNtr,~iox .e,~, ~ _ vse.A I~.;t,o ~r~e~»1,~.Q e~en ~ dn~rn~ine ~~ ~? Q ,~la-+' l~a.o vt.~ #~c,~f'~~-~. , ~ cli.v g~-a~ ~ s~s?~ a 3~ v2~u-c.~.e_ @ a.tieks.~,- locc.~tie,-~ •U, io ~nn.A.Qea U. ~:~ r D W t,7~ I i i~ • • DA"I'E ~ COA~IA~IUNICATCON LOG ~ iNIT[~~L R 0 ~ . ~ C~~ i ~ ~U f ~~~ ' c~ -~_- ~ ~ _F /' ~J t? 8~-)--r~G a o-rl f' -,1-06 v o L f q -_~ le r 2 Graw~'af1c~ Ct °!'F-~fv h. o w r`~ , l r- -. .. - .%~._ i'., .ivl; martin. ¢.dr .. ~.. .~1,~"'r ~P ,!~` /' ~( t J i C' C F: G' ~ ~ g •a~-o6 y-7-:~,F ; ., ,,,, n - ~, ; n ..~ - „ ~ ivt'c. fJ r ^-~i` ,.F;i~ ~1 r:.~s->.Y ' ~ . " may- lr`:'~ yl L'7,r'..1 U ~ ° 0. ~ 1 r'~~:~'~~ i~? -Gr~"t0 ~ Pl'k'P ~• 122r mar ~v ,Cr-" tn~5 ~4k~~~'Gt IY7VU..f'~(>fc~, -~i7V'1,P C~JCt'SCtIS01N~Iu:/(~r~ . . - 1_ ~ PEARCE, CONSC ~ ANTS INC, -RESIDENTIAL CEd2VIG~~' FORT[ C.\SE ID: - ~ - - l/ //G'c ~c\': .~ ~' ., corcsuLTAn'r: OCCUP:\NT L~'FOfiDLCI-IOn': il„ i ~~~ i . (( ~ ~ D\YI>LLING: ~ ~~~+ N:WOR EY ENTS: ~ / ~~~,~~ -/'~)~~~~- Clainnnt(s); ~I , 111'~,'~`,~ -i onth ly Payment c I Site blos~e-In: ~ / / ~ G~~~ t )~~~, ' 1.~,~,C'.L ~ _ '~ Firt Other / / _ '~ ~~7 ~ l i~ ~~ Address: ~ '"~~' ~ /./ r ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,~ Number of Bedrooms: !7\ Initi;il InlcrviLw~a / L / ~_ C ~ dp yL"~j ~ G ~~G2~ y ~ "~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~t 1 ~~'~ y-G t ~- 1 i T Toial Nwnber of Rooms: ' ' ' / Home Phone: ~~I~dt~- (/'~7tP! `~~L'e- n 6echc~oms Needed: ~ U I I LITI E51 AIU BY: Gos: ~ Tenant ^Owmci c~~l~ iiC~~f~- " /VNV//t~ . -,,(( , ^ \5'ork Phane: O ~ - ^ Furnished Dwelling Elecliic: VJ Tenant Owner / ~ ) I n .. i7~~.,, ~ ~ ~~ R'ata': L/] Tenant ^ Owner Social Sec. N: - - ~ - ~ d' OCCUPANCI' S'FATUS~, ~ Rem ^ Lease ^ Mortgage ^ Own (Clear) ^ Vacant ^ No Contact DN'ELLINC'PYPE ^ Single Family 12esidence' ^ Duplex ~Apamnenl ^ Condon-ownhouse ^ Hotel/Motel ^l,7ohile Home GFIINICITI': ^ R'hite. ^ Hispanic ~J Black ^ Asian ^ Other: PRIMARI' LANGUAGE: ~ English. ^ Spanish ^ Other , OCCUPANT INFOIL\1AT10N: ^ Elderly Household ^ Handicapped Household ~ DOES THE OCCUPANT HAVE A SECTION 8 VOUCHER? ousing Assistance: 8 ^ Willing m Relocne 1'mm Conununity ~ I'ES NO aI Features/lmprovanents: fvea/Unit Preference: IF YES NOTIFY MRS PEARCE . . >' 'L ~i 7E7~ZL, _~~,^'--../,~y~, ~%J CT ~,lr. .Jl,4~2'rY FADITLY COMPOSITION (USE SEPARATE SIiEETS FOR SPLlT CASTS) NAML'(FIRS"F, LAST) SES AGE AfONTHLYI\CODIE Kotes(rdalion, employmenq schooh lransporlaLion. handicap. elc) I ~~/ t ~ 1 G~ '~--~'C"i~.fG M F~ ~~~ $ N-P. '~ ./'e~ }'~ +'~~ ~-'l.C,~J-~ z ~~• 1r\ i ' ~lt•~ ,,f :~ ~ F ~ s10, tL~o v~-c9-Q G ~ : , , 3 kI F S ~~01 LI ~ ~ I O' 4 hl F S S t`t F S fi M P 5 i Ai F S S MF S ' 1 I .;~'~,,.iGq,~~~'~C~CG-1 1-~n,~T L~rG,,,,v~~ ~"~= C'-11~1~i-l..v-<'-'L?'~1 / (f ,; ~ ^ ' -l v ~s_, ,I (`~~. .~ L/~ I ~j} ll RCE CONSULTING, INC. 347 10th Street, P.O. Box 56, Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562J 593-6968 • (562J 598-6998 1'exrcc Consulting, Tnc. - Lli\C Llousin; i, ___._,, .... ., .1 ,1 no rtm nn tc RA^CI30 CUCIIm011 day CA Check Request Form n,.~_~~F Date: 5 - ` [70 Amount: ~ 7 y~/~ - Case# E-=(~ Consultant: /`~~~-Y~' CI{ # Payment Type Advance Actual bloeing Dovvm Pa}'ment • ~ Rental Assistance Other 'Peasants Name and Address v soh ~~~~ / ~ 't-i, tw `z:r~~ ~I- ,`~1 G, c; ~ ~~~~ c, ~rCv:•~ , /~//` /~ (l C.T~r f 007"' l"vt ~~ tJiVJ Zy' ~ _ L! Date ~~TT, Type CIC# Make Check Payable To (ff Othec Then Tenant's Namc) 5necial Note ~V~'d l'I." tr / 1~1'l ,~1'Cna^-~6 ~~~~ltiG- Date -:. ;~ f /. ~~~ ~i' ~11 vl / ~~ 1 ];evcrly S. Pearce, 1'resideut Date Housing Consultants 'gnature - Date - Date check should be ddiveretl to tenants: - ' Datc of len:utts.:,tcve: .' '' ~S'_.~-'S~ ~% i°. - - r ~~ ~..,a1.,>;'.x~.~. ~.l., !:.~ ~1_c_a~ s.io. ,.. c._u ..v..f; T ..,...±.i:s:= _S~rY„e..xv('..; ,icv~d~.~....:..-'k~blrs=ir.~„E .'s..ui.3L a.~.l~+'...,li {..~ ~ ~.-.i:.i_a. _..'} ~~.v...`I ~ rn PEARCE CONSULTING, INC. °oa17?17222 1 3 2 9 347 10TH STREET SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 (5621598-6968 TO'ff1E( ~"LYI'1 /~1 /11 !.~ 1 /~ !A a6:~ LI ~ r~ CITIBANK IWESTI, F58 Citibank ONE VJOON6 BEACH, CA 9093~UITE 100 n -- , ~ . ~'/''!Y~ U,\TH ~-DOLLA IIS 8 ~„„ e., µ~: AUTHORIZEOSIGNATURE ct il'OOi329(I' 1:322277241: 20L766870ii' h"a°'~~"trkLJS.T~Yt,~~.w~i".~YC~~~J,~;.~u~,AJf~.a'AT'?u}£71.~~Ii:2'.~Ti~e'~fi~..51.~i.F,'.'~E~~~~.+{~4Cw".L'~~.2U~iti+u~.a"e'..+'~i,f~Y.lry~L'~.fi. ..+xYf...~..1.9 V.. !: ~ ~..~° Y` ~// ~~~ ,/A7hP. ~ ~`~OD (., 1' ' ~. • • 0 0 r r W ru ru r ru r ti 0 r 0'~ Q~ Q] F$ J 'Z7 U ~ l ~ ~, A ~~ ~'• ~~ ~, T o ~ ,~ ` m. ~ ~ 2 0 ~~y czi°m ti msz nom n ~mR nzu n - oa ~- v _~nc c y s `"1 m m (~ T~ ~a m . r+= to W J rn m ~ Q NDo ~n=z m?Ny ~n~~ ~Dm~ ~o~Z a .(~ o Z '~ J ° 1 '~ CJ"1 '-~_ I/ Vii' ~' ,r y,. G;~ ,~L9 _4ti __ Postmark 41a`~~~~ ~: -nn- --~t~~ -----d------ ~- ~~--f~tle ~ 4~1------ a G~ q1~~ '~ 8 Poetmerk Har 531 ~~~ I..~l ' ^ Comp'te items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete I Rem 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ^ Pdnt your name and address on the reverse I so that we can return the card to you. i ^ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, i or on the front if space permks. ~ 1. Article Addressed to' Mr ~ MrS.Johnny Craw-Ford 7~(a~ Milli Key ~~~ X424. I 'Rn~l~u„ ~'l~r/'fr~n~n~ ~ II N"~~, yj _--__...r~, J..., _.. q 1730 A Signature x ^ Agent ^ Atltlressee B.. Recelvetl by (Pr/nted Name) C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from ttem 17 ^Ves ;'.If YES, enter delivery address below: ^ No (~Cert166dMb11 ^ F~ress Mall v ^ Registered ~ Retum Receipt }or Merchandise ^ Insured Mall ^ C.O.D. 2. Article Number (Tiansler rrorn servke feDt~ PS-Form 3811, February 2004 a. HesmCtetl Delivery? (Ertra Fee) 7003 2260 001 4182 6057 Domestic Retum Receipt j ^ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 if Restdcted Dellveryls desired. ~ v. Print your name and address on-the relierse j so that we can iturn the card toyou. j ^ Attach this card to the backof the mallplece;: I or on the front If space permRS. .. j 1. Article Addessed to: n'1r ,Johnny N.L~awFaYd Ms. YvlagUita M.51~/al ~'i~8 m~IliKen Ave., A-pf. +~a~f ^ Yes 102595-02-M-1540'; - i .... A. SignRture ~ I .~Al tlj/~I- ~n ~1 ///A1A1A1 ^ Agent X ~^~ `~"~ ' ~ ` ~~ ^ Addressee ~ ~~. B. ecelved (Prlnted.N ej C. Date pf QelNgry• D. Is delivery address difteraM from ttem 17 ^ Yes I If YES, enter delivery address Delow: ^ No i /1 j K ~ (~Q ~~~}~ (~ ~.) \ ~- 3. Service Type ~ ,Q~~ertlfled Mall - ~ ; O Eq}ress Mall ~ ~Reglstered O- Retum Receipt tq Mercnaridiso: ' (Q) -7 1 130 ~ Insured Mall . . ~ C.O.D. _ I 4. ResVictetl Oeliver}~1 (Fa'tra Fee) ^Ves. r 2. Article Number (fiansrer rrom seMCa habelJ. 7003 2263' 0001 4182 6088 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Retum Receipt ~ ~ ~ tozs9soz~ni-t5ao ~~ ~' o°® I ~a.~~i~C~~~ TECH N YJURK VHUG's NUMBER PRINT DATE _ ., STOIJiER NUMBER COMPANY DIVISION FRANCHISE I SCHEDULED ~ VJ.O. DESCRIPTION DATE TIME UfdITS SiDENCE PHCNE BUSINESS PHONE MCBILE PHOIJE ACCOUNT TYPE PRIM. LOC. CODE SEC. ICC. CODE ALES REP. HSE. P,SSDC. CUSTOMER NAME AND SERVICE ADDRESS HEAD END DWELLING TYPE CASCADE ' SAS! ri~i ivl EiJ' DATE HOUSE SIAIUS '° ..c NOTES TO TECHNICIAN DROP LOCATION D-CODE CURRENT BALANCE I er bas recemea ana arcvplec me corms pt me enune. Piparne casmmer Agreemam, Accemama use TROUBLE CALL REASONS antl Pnvary PeIiN. ChaMr may Grange, am_na. alley, cr metliW this Pgreemen! at aq~ lime. Chaney may .uslomor p. any Mnnos eililer by gczl:rr~ Ma! Grnge on Chaney s weh59e fcv:::.Chaf~g!,L9miL 0y sentl~ ::Omer an email m by LLS. ~n ii. II Cus!omer continues N use Ghandr Pipeline'aller notice nda been meta e. Cwlomer agrees Ip accept Mose changes. leolnilials ___ ~ '~ __ nooncir rn cnl I FCT DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TP,G NO. EPAYMENT TO COLLECT PREPAYMENT AMOUNT PAIC IH~rvv _ __I l AMOUNT TO COLLECT TOTAL AMOUNT PAID TAG NO. "' EX TF , L01 tLENT$ U hnAT'A14L$'J$ED ENT > L CASH ^ CHECK L CARDi I ~~`_~_ VISA ^ MC ~ DISCOVER pang COMPLETION WE'RE ON TIME FINDING CODES SOLUTION CODES i 'TE I TECH N START STOP CODE I FAULT CODE I SIGNAL LEAKAGE DETECTED OYES ONO GB GROUNDED O VES ONO 1 acknpwleege receipt pl me edmpmon! as lute± above. I mn+e: ai.nme~gx saf'afa~ry cmvleva m me rvprx perlomrec as Inoi[aleb above; anb Indt I nave rcaU ana agree b Ns Y'mv5 arM mWlfions an Ne ra+crse zi0e.ll a parson oNer Nan Ine customer namev above s8^z the agreement on behN! bl Me asslaner.INt ineMGVL is tleeme0 m De m= au!henzen aycn c. NEASUPED__~_FEET REPAIRED OVES ONO ~ me cumwner, arq me cusmmeragrees tp be bare b',rNS:ecnscmpb,lm ne rere:se =_ue cf Ells nox ama:. - .... -'~ LEVEL G.R_ I LE\'EL SET LEVEL DATA LEVEL r _ _ .,. _ oaTC cUSOtaER fEEwTIFI=R • 1,~6~ ' ~ 21'S S3T~ ~^~ r-^ I ~ ',. ~z,- i O i m :~ ~ i I ~ _- ~ J V - ~ - ~ 1 ~ Y _~~ 1 W ' -' C ® I J ~ ZI I I i C: i (n ® I~ h j Y 1 ('i '~ 1 .~ tII ~ ~ I~ i I Ic I _` o E ~y f 1 j ~ .A1 C + LC "' ~ l - i ~ C i I i ~, I< - I f `l I'~ ~ ~ L ~1_ CI '.:J ~~u~- -- Ito i1 :~ E f~= __ u> :, a=_ • COMBINED AGREEMENT~FO'R"MOVIFIG'SERVICESAND~FREIGHT BILL _r•)It ADD'L PICK UP A .HEAD ~ THIS CONTRACT I~..P' eia+" ' -8 9-==10=11= I I I I n l l l l l I I Ilnlllln ~~ 4=--5- I IT i°I{k Ills iiliri i+l'rnlll iit l: Shippe iYFi ^naswalAn~°a.°~emne"' non wRraemlian ooa not Pro tm to nnenon r•~ 3•r 5 tlermgam'amwr .mw.tau..aa.a w9m r:raLaaaryt rm 9.mrnNlm$p hxdaa •^ r l - s " -e~-;~ 7IALS " '°' ~~ CbNI'AIN~ _--' RS,y .:- •PACKING. ... .. - :'UNPACKING Jlaaals ua e: [a oagclinalor Wi:pplq wAaXlaetNgmg3 sl . Iputemw,gtuaaaeuNaepmllw mvl ee Wen letwrgwry %xilllq Sm,e in urv aewdlm al MATEI .Gty '.Rah::: •- .AnwuM Gtr' Rah 'Al lquM Oty. Aal¢ Amount Pm : ~a -~ di6hpack}'asd4` :. - Name of ... ... Db ' ' ~ ~~ mm .. a -. ~~ . , .G~is l1/2 GU A:. : : - `( . aNltynaa B'Ii Dava --- , i . . _ ~ ' xsravm '' ~ lr 131eb n 5 `I : ro nso :- .,. ~ < ~ r e ~. xnxvawE Plmxrs ~ usmascLasae vsEOMawr°°emps r{~ If1fCI1Vi5 ^.: -fY11N3tEGYt9n I]:'9RR%NV.fRF41a, W., t 4.12N yy I~ s1? ,....:. ~•. Doee:Shipper Request AdNCa 01 Welghl antl Char s4 ~ .Yes ~ No ., , 6 N n i • a TerIH epplying to thls shipment Is PUC MA%4 • , Mabre55 Srji.~'-- last Pomh Nametl) AO-B/Pl 1,000Ibs, 2,OIl0.lbs. 5,0001bs. 8,0001bs. Maaress lawno:: .. - a :;, ..... . . a- ` - . - ... .. :King or oiaeeLlSwFi~ `~ - - _ 12,000 lbs. t6,0001bs. .Min. Waighl Mlles Gross Tare : .:Net .. :Cllb 1 .c..l I•: Carry "' Per wl.. Extra pickup Ransil Store Pate Wartlrobe f I'i[kup and tlel. at Pei Flight nlherlsangrpundflom tAtltl'I Chg. anNor Delivery at$ ea $ .CWT ~ Crates -- t ,- Vale. cng5~ ~' xqurs 4 nwuim aimwmvm mq. Loadin '.. --.Hrs. ..Sales Taz _:._ ..... ' - '. .. : .. ' q 1 psi man Van anO J Mn5 110 P[, Nr, alf br, Double _ ptlvln HIS.-. •'::. ,p,>, 1'1" • , AMOU NT Glcula[ea O is fl ealnB a I alnA llmeP llS pU BLE naMNGIIME PI nma[ ~r .a on me mat , ' Unloatl Hrs. . t rl:~Xw9 anea Irv rY E betweeeP el.e lNtw nP COnI xp oE n m[12000 . .OTAL. -DELIVERY, Y'AICK UP OF-CONTAINER ® $ . e q. PALXENG P NINE P Ma ,; Mm.aw- ' .. l/ . (fi Drlyar - ~• ".PACKERS NAME'."~ .HOURS. DATE Pt P. Pn, w. aaArING^OS ~ ~ UNPACKING ~ Pel Man f ~ -0NCflFTINGO®S PeFHr. HR er ~ ~~•'~~~~ ~'~~•• ' - 151 AnW ... PA41 At•It. MYea r ..:..,. .. .t/. Hel er ' ... J f ~ I ~ ' } TOTAL HOURS@$ -~ ne ~ -- ~ - Ndiq 'Is9lata /' . Van NO. - .. ~. ~ ~ . ~~ - - ~ ~ ~ ` ~ O Dest. TOTi1L PACKING No: of. Packers OOri iD~ _ , a t -. f !i: ,' ::': ~ ' ~ ,-. L. ".-1CAFiTAGE®~$ ~ Per Hr. . - -e: ><>, .;;: ; - . ~ - '. Oveitime ~ ~ Hours®$~_ - ~Per.Hc. 1 ,q,, ~:. - .as., ~, `y`~'`r `" ' -. ° k °E ' `EXtia Man (`' ') - '. -. Hours @.$ Per Hr. - 9 M• ~_ a ivY~ec ~ 4TH 4,t; .xE P APPLIANCESiIO be serviced If none v. n!e "NONE" ' ~~ ~y e §3 ~~ I Ja~:`.~nny~p4"'FsFMti, Tr3r1+3S1E&`li?svF3 _ / -. ~~ •ecive' ,~A~ ~ '•yap,;,-~;~. ~w _P ~ $~yN l; ~~ EX RA ICK-UP OR DELIVERY ~~ ; - Lbs. ®$ Per Cwt. - - FII ht Char elLon Carr ~ ® ¢ Per Cwt. aa,Fg d d>KihAr .b n.... A - ~- CONSUMER PROTECTIONS AND/OR WAIVERS .. VALUATIONbHARGE tlarKe vnN the rules of Ne Gaaraa PUalc UllGSes Cammissbn, bade yas: Fr ' r• r • ALL-ITEMS LOADED/UNLOADED . Naaa I mme, lse mNlel ptle lnovin9 LOmpanylhrepuvN lpema<yop RAe Y+ppal Aave seen 9r+en Ne baaHa gapOgTpNT NFOgMn110N FOR PEA50NE MOVINr, NOU6ENOl0 GOUOG'. You may cAlxue r~pl la reserve a booklet nom ttus [artlet it ya ae„aah rttervea one hmm mN- erswaa. BY nilalNg belaw,Ne NipperaWwlNetlges rttelpl pnh¢sooKlet eiher seloream el e ~t g AND PLACED PER SHIPPER - ND~D'AMAGES X h HAVE RECEIVED T IMPORTANT.INFORMATION BOOKLET ' t. is°•= ' ' XNTIPL6' -OATF. • t• t he CPUCrequires Ihal an'Agreemanl Ier Moving.Services' be issuetl to ypu by the carrier ce days o ~ ore n advanco of the mo e. An exception to This requirement is where the ema 1 to move occurs on sho t nonce Qess than 3 tlays). You mey also Ohoose tp i ~ OT:RESPO SIB ' E F O~ LS ,,, ng reement entirely al any llm@ pribr to the move. thi a i g ve s y,/ •~~Didybu choose.to waive this requirement entirely? ~ Yes. "+rf NoT~~ ~ ' ESTIMATED COST OFSERVICES If any) ' ' a' Was the mdving tlate~agreed to between you & the No 4k~is~r n ' ?TOTAL'~CHARGES ON CHANGE ORDER' ' ~. - ) ' t111 i19t Ye less Ttian 3daysprior tot e.day of lhe.,move carrler, ~~~~~ '.e7 `RIat - Y.NDTTD EXCEED PRICE'shbjectgCnan eOrder for Service) . i Please Prim Shipper's Na e. t+ v ~ NO WRITTENNISUALESTIMATE ~~~ ~ TDTAI. PAID Q bYi ShiOpers Signaturd!']tm -•_ 's ' ~ -t"'t"' •-- ~ ~ ' CUSTOMER AGREES.TH ITLEIDA PAChlnb ma+crna~~t.n.. .. ~ -- -- _ -. CUSTOMER PASSES j0 TOMER P IOR TO THE TRANSPORTATIUN OF SUCH PROPERTY TO . TO BE PAID BY O CASH ^ CHECK O CERTIFIED ¢HECK O MONEY OPI'ER rJ GRE01i CARD O APPR. fiILUNG THE CUSTOMER BY CAFR R. - ' • r r ~ r there are IDree 13) oDlions aybilasle Ie aovu loss pr tlamage: - ~1. WLents psi posrl0 per.altitle. iMt rtin'unum cDrerage tot bslaa:magetl ilemsuWHa sn 6o ranU lNMS Ne.mghalhe aNde~rneaoveNge is siovisW atwatltl'IWAaI[Nrye. - YSUm se Wreb la Nis coverage.' Aduai GvA Value. Tnis option prsntles lot lmlor barrage baSM pn aOUal asn nlve.mtlp9inq Pepredauos. at the time pl NSS Or Wmage up lp lsersarbppaamlauNd vale eedalN NYDD aY 9 F80 Value Pmletlipa:IAU 9plion provib¢s for Ise Iosl sl eamahee ALtual C sh Value lot plpassesnUDalD Ihehamounl oISE20a0gg vne155Rlhe IShipO<r slgninp IhISIAg2elmen~n~ s Is shmsl ace below~~~n his~o~she own hantlwliling9n Dlflersvalue 9 You N1a ~OTILE Coverage for lmr antl tlamage is limiletl tole ~.~_lwyta.oslmwwu9tt aw+v bewA r! chmgetl for coverage pmvitletl plher Ihan 60 Lents per pountl per snide. Shipper Rereby releases IM entire Shipment to a value not exceetl ng _ $ ~~"~B' -' - Maximum Smrage in-Transit"'. OPTIONAL Mfnlmu valuations basedT n weigh) VALUATION OPTIGNS Slnll al your clleice Lansportation ¢r t antl valuation minimums Rate - no aaalonal chargb VALUATION OPTIONS, .p p , Basic:, 60pentvlb.larl ~, no atltlilional charge P/ ^~ ^'I' - $_per 4100 $ .7$ _a 'S^- per3104ti j. Basic: 60centsrlb /atl. not apt disable Adual Cash Value - ~" _ -;.1 ~ g_ _per pound u~t~e~~wyv 5i .: _ - n, - A 1 al cash valoc FVII Value ' ,h;C~ , $_per SI00 .$ ] 2D 1 ' $_p 8100. ~ Full Value Protection $_ _.Per pountl No DeOUClible .. ' ~ Deauenble of$no 'M $_per $too. - $'` s.45 1 5' g :_per $100 ~-~ "' ' Oetlupide 013600N '' S per5 S 25 a 81~~~ YtF=w"JD~~Ia~ `~ ~~/ i' - Shlppe s ~GnaUN a': ~•`' '- ',, r. - w:menl NMl[N WLIUUFS INf LON01a10N5 Pa N1ED OY iHF OALN INE .WtttwMV9 •+5-P avVtE nwmt IN1 ou011 q eNx W 51 0 IawI IMW eMn a PI WUn 41itY ^It M IE OW a fiM1 IISIaY I m ma lnq o:rm Iln a tL lNlll• m, yr_a 09 ^n fIM:IMIIn t4 Pm avq ip In a.lat fii IIaSM Weti egea:M E EY I.4mt IM I Va aN W m1 aGd LWIMM1 IAI OfINEE f511PE L00 le sdn V M teNM IM, 1 4 cmin! I zl >p - _ ~ eiL..a'~wir,b p II y q ee:pt ^ PECEIVEO PAYMENT FOP COMI PNY 4y11 RECEIVED BY 'osv1 C~~itr '-~~~'>J~ - .X •` TQ T TN F S CONSIGNEE X 4 ~' Ica BRS.: 7i „ F Ti T Ti R V ,~ 51 TURF ~ NoneE:Plmeeln:P lvom09oas Pro pny Cla ms lgranyl zl9r aame9ee-aom meal b[mea.xn me ce„e, n.:nnq . ..... . .. ............vnl: nt uw na pnnnr u•n HIES LOAIMISGON RIII FS OR PEfIIEATIONS. EVEN THOUGH NOT EAI ftESSEY $Ei FORTH IN THE AGREEMENT ~~VIOI'11NGGGGGG~~ STORAGE aaoEP oar s: LCICAt`&'Eb'F1G DISTANCE MOV6°ATE . 11633,MABTENS RIVES..CIRCLE;,,; w,cK °ATE: y-. --t)b ' '- 'FOUNTAIN VALLEY, GA 92708: '. -'°E`""E' ' PHONE (714j 540 1100 TA"E"°" RroNSONREVEll6E SNE aENAE61GrmaG'TCUPlfmaa~oplarnkr;'-,alyj9Hlg alr¢tiI,BIXPn31HalIWIV1~~~rtP nahw THIS WILL CONFIPM IN6iflUCTI0N5 AND 4•TIIM 1'ft':1 -:*'aI 1 ~R N ~ '1 YYiA~"R fd ^V... t`S.. ~~ APT NO (~ ~' [.~`"} I ~ - • U C lAg ~ Qt. i• PT. NO. U:IIC7~8, ~-~-Dd59 '': ONE :., PHONE - -' annn nn new nnoPSS - ~ ' • • ~~ !~~ (~'\ i -! r is ,h ~ a: • i x o A N m O Fl 1 i% N ~ 1 tO 0 qp n y C ~(\~ ~y~ ~- .~ ~ '~- :_:.~: ` V telr J~ ' f4 \I`• f6~ a.. ^ dy: III p. tt 4 ~ ia'