HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-270 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 07-270
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL
AND APPROVING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT (ALSO
REFERRED TO AS HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT)
DRC2007-00119, TO IMPLEMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2006-00540, ALLOWING A DENSITY BONUS AND
MODIFYING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 225 WORKFORCE APARTMENT UNITS ON
VACANT PROPERTY IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 13233
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, IN THE AREA BETWEEN THE
ETIWANDA SAN SEVAINE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL ON THE
EAST, AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR ON THE WEST-APN: 0229-041-10;
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. RECITALS.
1. On February 20, 2007, Pitassi Architects, Inc., on behalf of Northtown Housing
Corporation,filed an application for Density Bonus Agreement DRC2007-00119,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Density Bonus Agreement is referred to as "the application."
2. An Initial Study and Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts was prepared and circulated on July 2, 2007 in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the City's
local'CEQA Guidelines.
3. On July 25, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date. The Commission approved the related Development
Review DRC2006-00540 by adoption of their resolution No. 07-47 and
recommended approval of Density Bonus Agreement DRC2007-00119 to the
City Council by adoption of their resolution No. 07-46.
4. On August 6, 2007, a timely appeal was received on the project approvals and
recommendations made by the Planning Commission.
5. Following the appeal, staff determined that additional analysis of potential air
quality and traffic impacts was appropriate based upon comments received from
the South Coast Air Quality Management District on July 25, 2007, and public
comments made during the public hearing on that same date. Thereafter, LSA
Associates was commissioned to prepare two additional studies related to air
quality and traffic. A revised Initial Study was prepared and then circulated on
October 29, 2007, which incorporated the findings of the two new studies. Staff
reviewed the findings of the studies and determined that with the additional
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 2 of 15
analysis and with revised mitigation measures, there was no substantial
evidence of a significant impact to air quality or traffic as determined in the
original Initial Study circulated for the project. Further, based on the information
contained in the staff report for this item and in the revised and re-circulated
Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, the mitigation
measures contained in the re-circulated Initial Study, Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, are more effective in mitigating
or avoiding potential significant effects than the measures contained in the
original Initial Study.
6. On December 5, 2007,the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
7. The subject property of the Density Bonus Agreement is legally described herein.
8. A true and correct copy of the proposed Density Bonus Agreement is attached
as Exhibit "A".
9. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby found,determined, and resolved by the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on December 5, 2007, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds
as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 12.87 acres of land located on the
south side of Foothill Boulevard near the City's eastern borderwith the City of
Fontana/Unincorporated San Bernardino County. More specifically, the
property is situated between the existing Etiwanda San Sevaine Flood
Control Channel on the east and the Southern California Edison Corridor on
the west; and
b. The properties to the north are undeveloped commercial properties and the
Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridor in the General Commercial
and Open Space zone, and to the south is undeveloped land in the Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) District of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan. On the east side of the site is the San Sevaine Flood Control
Channel and single-family residential uses in the City of Fontana. To the
immediate west are SCE Transmission Lines in the Open Space zone and
further west is a single-family residential tract in the Low Density Residential
(2-4 dwelling units per acre) District; and
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 3 of 15
c. The application to which the Density Bonus Agreement applies contemplates
the construction of 225 workforce housing units and associated
improvements, on 12.87 acres of land at the above described location which
are permitted within the Medium residential zoning district; and
d. The design of the new units is a contemporary interpretation of the Tuscan
architectural style, featuring fully tiled roofs, trimmed out windows and door
openings, and walls clad in stucco and accented with fully grouted faux stone
veneer typically associated with the proposed style. On July 25, 2007, the
Planning Commission approved the project contingent upon City Council
approval of the Density Bonus Agreement; and
e. The Agreement proposes a 25 percent (45 units) density increase and
modification specific building setback/separation standards for the
construction of said workforce apartment units pursuant to California
Government Code Sections 65915-65918 and Development Code Chapter
17.40,
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth
in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
a. That the proposed project to which the Density Bonus Agreement is
associated with is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that, if
approved, the multi-family development is consistent with the Medium
Residential land use designation for the site. In addition, the approval will
further implement a specific objective of the General Plan Housing Element
to provide affordable housing units for all economic segments of the
community including low to moderate income households; and
b. The proposed project associated with the Density Bonus Agreement is in
accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the
district in which the site is located. The proposed multi-family residential use
is a permitted use within the underlying Medium Residential zoning
designation for the site, and requiring only design review and approval.
Further, the project is consistent with Affordable Housing Incentive/Density
Provisions section of the Development Code that allows applicants to
request a density bonus (25 percent requested) and development incentives
(3 incentives requested) to facilitate the construction of affordable housing
units within the city as mandated by State law; and
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each applicable provisions of the
Development Code. The site plan, architecture, and on-site improvements
are consistent with the development standards and design guidelines as
provided in the Development Code for multi-family residential development,
including density, building height, setbacks, provision of on-site recreational
amenities, and parking, except as modified for density, setback and building
separation standards as specified in the Density Bonus Agreement.
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 4 of 15
Moreover, the architecture for the project is well done and features high
quality details and exterior materials such as fully tiled roofs, trimmed out
windows and door openings, and walls clad in stucco and accented with fully
grouted faux stone veneer. Moreover, landscaping and recreational
amenities are well distributed throughout the site as described in the staff
reports forthe project and depicted on plans reviewed by the Design Review
Committee and approved by the Planning Commission, and
d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto,
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project includes
numerous site improvements and required improvements to the public right
of way adjacent to the site, including installation of full street improvements
and center median along Foothill Boulevard and a new traffic signal at East
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The development of the site as proposed at
this location will contribute to, and tie in with, other physical improvements
(e.g., storm drains and roadway improvements) in the area that are currently
underway or anticipated in the near future.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is
no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant adverse effect
upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigated Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's
local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential
environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that
Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation
measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would
have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided
public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the
Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. Following the filing of a timely appeal, City staff determined that additional
analysis of potential air quality and traffic impacts was appropriate based on
comments received from South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD). A revised initial study was prepared and circulated which
incorporated the findings of the two new studies prepared by LSA
Associates. Staff reviewed the findings of the studies and determined that,
with the additional analysis and with revised mitigation measures, there was
no substantial evidence of a significant impact to air quality or traffic as
determined in the original Initial Study circulated for the project. Further,
based on the information contained in the staff report for this item and in the
revised and re-circulated Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the mitigation measures contained in the re-circulated Initial
Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program,
are more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects than
the measures contained in the original Initial Study.
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 5 of 15
c. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all
comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based
on the whole record before it„ finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on
the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that
the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council
further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City
Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
d. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements
of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is
designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project
implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for the project.
e. The custodian of records forthe Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the
record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the
Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are
available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750.
5. Based upon the findings contained in Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4, the City Council
hereby denies the appeal of the Planning Commission recommendation and
approves the Density Bonus Agreement attached to this Resolution.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to (a) certify
to the adoption of this of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified
return-receipt requested to Pete Pitassi Architects on behalf of Northtown
Housing Authority Corporation and Mr. Kenneth Van Horn at the addresses
identified in City records.
Please see the following page
for formal adoption,certification and signatures
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 6 of 15
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5`h day of December 2007.
AYES: Gutierrez, Kurth, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
Donald J. Kurth, .D., Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Ada , CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J.ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held
on the 5'h day of December 2007.
Executed this 6tn day of December 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, C, City Clerk
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 7 of 15
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
- City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn:
APN: 0229-041-10
Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Govt.Cod. Sec.27383
(Space aboveforrecorder'suse) .
DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT
This AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of
2007,by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal
corporation(the "City"), and NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a
California nonprofit public benefit corporation(the "Developer"), with reference to the following
facts:
A. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has adopted a Density Bonus Ordinance
(Ordinance No. 749 on November 2,2005,codified in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
Chapter 17.40) (the "Ordinance")to conform with State Density Bonus Law (Government Code
Sections 65915 and 65917), which allows a density bonus for the provision of housing affordable
to very low income, lower income,moderate income, and senior households.
B. Developer is the owner of certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference(the
"Property„).
C. Developer has received a discretionary approval from the City to construct a total
of two hundred twenty-five (225) residential rental units known as San Sevaine Villas(the
"Development") on the Property. Pursuant to the Ordinance and Government Code 65915;the
Developer has requested that the City grant Owner for the Development a density bonus of forty-
five (45) units(the"Density Bonus") and the following modifications to building separation and
set back requirements (collectively, the"Concessions"):
• Reduction of building to curb setback from twenty-five feet(25')to
twenty feet(20') in five locations in the Development as shown on the attached Exhibit B
(Conceptual Site Plan).
• . Reduction of building to property line setback from thirty feet(30')to
twenty feet(20') in one location in the Development as shown on the attached Exhibit B
(Conceptual Site Plan).
11244-0001\976247v2.doc
tKwe r A
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 8 of 15
• Reduction of minimum building to building separation from forty feet
(40') to twenty feet (20') for a 3-story building to 3-story building separation and from thirty feet
(30') to seventeen feet (I T) for a 3-story building to 2-story building separation in the two
locations shown on the attached Exhibit B (Conceptual Site Plan).
In exchange, the Owner shall provide at the Development fifty-six (56)units which will be
affordable and rented to Moderate Income Households, and seventy-four(74)units which will be
affordable and rented to Very Low Income Households and thirty-six(36) units which will be
affordable and rented to Extremely Low Income Households, all as have particularly set forth in
that certain Regulatory Agreement between the Developer and the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency(the"Agency's dated November 9, 2005, which was recorded on
November 30, 2005 as Document No. 2005-0857344 in the Official Records of San Bernardino
County, California(the''Regulatory Agreement"). The Owner shall provide an additional fifty-
nine(59)units which will be affordable and rented to Low Income tenants for a term of 55-years,
subject to a regulatory agreement under the State Tax Credit Allocation program, (collectively
the"Affordable Units').
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits received by the Developer and the
City, the Developer and City agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Regulatory Agreement. In addition to those terms defined in
the Recitals, the following terms are specially defined in this Agreement:
(a) "Affordable Rent"means the maximum total charge for a Unit.permitted
by Section 2.4 of the Regulatory Agreement.
(b) "Affordable Units"is defined in Recital C.
(c) "Property"is defined in Recital B.
Section 2. Grant of Density Bonus and Concessions. In consideration for the
Affordable Units being provided at the Development, and consistent with the Ordinance and the
State Density Bonus Law,the City hereby grants the Developer the Density Bonus and the
Concessions (as described in Recital C)for the Development.
Section 3. Satisfaction of Ordinance Oblieation and Conditions of Approval. The
requirements of the Ordinance shall be satisfied with respect to the Property if the Developer
complies with the Regulatory Agreement, the Loan Agreement between the Developer and the
Agency datedSeptember 1, 2005 (the"Loan Agreement's and the documents described in the
Loan Agreement (the"Other Loan Documents").
Section 4. Marketing and Rental of Affordable Units. Developer shall comply with
any and all applicable fair housing laws in the marketing and rental of the Affordable Units.
Developer shall accept as tenants, on the same basis as all other prospective tenants persons who
are recipients of federal certificates or vouchers for rent subsidies pursuant to the existing
housing program under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act, or its successor.
2
11244-00011976247v2.dm
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 9 of 15
Section 5. Default and Remedies. Upon a default by Developer which is not cured
after any applicable notice and expiration form applicable cure period expressly described in the
Regulatory Agreement, Loan Agreement or Other Loan Documents,the City may terminate this
Agreement, and the City may exercise any and all other remedies available to it at law, in equity,
under the Regulatory Agreement, the Loan Agreement or any loan documents described in the
Loan Agreement.
Section 6. Remedies Cumulative. No right,power, or remedy given to the City by
the terms of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other right, power, or remedy; and
each and every such right,power, or remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every other
right,power, or remedy given to the City by the terms of any such document,the Ordinance,or
by any statute or otherwise against Developer and any other person.
Section 7. Attorneys Fees and Costs. The City shall be entitled to receive from the
Developer or any person violating the requirements of this Agreement,in addition to any remedy
otherwise available under this Agreement or at law or equity, whether or not litigation is
instituted,the costs of enforcing this Agreement, including without limitation reasonable
attorneys' fees.
Section 8. Hold Harmless and Indemnification, Developer will indemnify and hold
harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents in their official capacity
(the"Indemnitees'), and any of them, from and against all loss, all risk of loss and all damage
(including expense)sustained or incurred because of or by reason of any and all claims,
demands, suits, actions,judgments and executions for damages of any and every kind and by
whomever and whenever made or obtained, allegedly caused by, arising out of or relating in any
manner to this Agreement. The provisions of this Section shall survive expiration or other
termination of this Agreement.
Section 9. Notices. All notices required pursuant to this Agreement shall be in
writing and may be given by personal delivery or by registered or certified mail,return receipt
requested, to the party to receive such notice at the addresses set forth below:
TO THE CITY:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn:
TO THE DEVELOPER:
Northtown Housing Development Corporation
8599 Haven Avenue, Suite 205
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn: Executive Director
Any party may change the address to which notices are to be sent by notifying the other parties
of the new address, in the manner set forth above.
3
11244-0001�976247v2.doc
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 10 of 15.
Section 10. Inteerated Agreement. This Agreement and the documents referred to in
this Agreement constitute the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter thereof.
Section 11. Amendment of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only upon
the written consent of the City and the Developer,
Section 12. No Joint Venture or Partnership. Nothing contained in this Agreement or
any document executed pursuant to this Agreement shall be construed as creating ajoint venture
or partnership between City and Developer.
Section 13. Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by
California law. Venue for any dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be San Bernardino
County.
Section 14. Waivers: Any waiver by the City of any obligation or condition in this
Agreement must be in writing. No waiver will be implied from any delay or failure by the City
to take action on any breach or default of Developer or to pursue any remedy allowed under this
Agreement or applicable law. Any extension of time granted to Developer to perform any
obligation under this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver or release from any of its
obligations under this Agreement. Consent by the City to any act or omission by Developer shall
not be construed to be a consent to any other or subsequent act or omission or to waive the
requirement for the City's written consent to future waivers.
Section 15. Title of Parts and Sections. Any titles of the sections or subsections of this
Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in interpreting .
any part of the Agreement's.provisions.
Section 16. Multiple Orieinals: Countemarts. This Agreement may be executed in
multiple originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and may be signed in counterparts.
Section 17. Recording of Agreement. The Parties shall cause this Agreement to be
recorded against the Property, in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino.
Section 18. Severability. In the event any limitation, condition, restriction, covenant,
or provision contained in this Agreement is to be held invalid,void or unenforceable by any
court of competent jurisdiction, or if any provision of this Agreement is rendered invalid or
unenforceable pursuant to any California statute which became effective after the effective date
of this Agreement, the remaining portions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full
force and effect.
Section 19. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement:
Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property
Exhibit B Conceptual Site Plan
4
11244-0001\976247v2.doc
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 11 of 15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of
the day and year first above written.
DEVELOPER: CITY:
NORTHTOWN HOUSING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,a a municipal corporation
California nonprofit public benefit corporation
By:
Its:
By:
Antonio I. Gracia, Executive Director
5
11244-0001\976247v2.doc
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 12 of 15
STATE OF CALIFORNLk )
)ss.
COUNTY OF )
On 20_, before me,
Notary Public in and for the State of California,personally appeared
personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose narne(s)is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF )
On 20.before me,
Notary Public in and for the State of California,personally appeared
personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s)whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
11244-0001V76247v2.doc
Resolution No. 07-270
Page 13 of 15
Exhibit A
Property Descript ion
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OP SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANDS 6
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN HERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCMDI270 TO OOVERMUNT SURVEY, LYSN0 RAST OF THH WEST LINE OF THAT
CERTAIN RUEMM7F CONVHYED'BY SANTA PH LAND IMPROVEME" COMPANY TO SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, IN DEED DATED OCTOBER 14, 1940, AND RECORDED OCTOBER
28, 1940, IN BOOM 1441 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAOR 66. '
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLS,OWS:
COMffiD = AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP '1
SOUTR, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN
THENCE SOUTH 00' 30' 15' WEST 650.11 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
TSRNCZ 907M 89. 21' 35' WEST 1071.37 PERT,
TSENCE NORTH 21' 16' 02' EAST 646.6 FRET; -
THENCE SOUTH 89' 23' 35' WEST 269.40 FEET,
TEMMM.BOOTH 21' 16', 02! WEST 2750.36 FEET, . '
THENCS NORTH 89' 23' CO"RAST 2089.40 FEET;
"THHNCE NORTH 00. 30' 15! EAST 1959.80 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGMaN0. .
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL OML, GAS AND OTHER NYDEOCUMw AND MINERAL SMSTANCES
(EXCEPT WATER) LYING NOT LESS THAN 100 FRET BELOW THE SURFACE OF-SAID REAL
PROPERTY, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN THE DERD FROM BANTA PE LAND INPROVEHEM'
COMPANY, A CORPORATION, TO OLIVER A. JOHNSON AND CRYSTAL M. 9OHNSON, U082AND AND.
WIFE, AS JOINT TEIENTS, DATED MAY 22, 1946 AND RECORDED TUNS 7, 1?46, A8
INSTIMCWT NO. 65, IN BOOK 1890 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAOE 49L, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY., WHIG RECT718i
"PRCVZDZD THAT THE FIRST PARTY, .ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAV-2-THE
EIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OP SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXTRACTING, AND RM40VDM ANY OF SUCH RESERVED SUBSTANCES, OR FOR ANY OTHER
PURPOSES'.
/ C
FOOTHILL BLVD.
II 9LDG B b BLDG.'B' "`i— — BL 'AP I
ILI`1Lro tI `^•�—I s '
UE L
IT T-na
Ail �1[I11J � c~ Mu Inb� a�i[
7A, 19-r
BLD 'AI'
F� a i Pi BL .'A2' ti "I
BLDG.jk-
'D I xl
c
01
16 f�<It - -!' —t ttOCi ... �y o
—.��, 2 cam ❑ uy�m5. c [�I_I'TJ
_ T�^ .
_1 J J
B ! BL A2 aq_ (� x 1J'
1
r '
0
w
` ,__;�
9
�
l
l/ i1Tl;[ TET[[1=1_ [TA? {
RF � 1 %DG.'D'
(' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I;a �sr
�br
r ar2a'as' r .oTST s O
C_
-00
A. REDUCE BUILDING TO.CURB SETBACK N D
(fsnm 25' to 20') - Z
Conceptual Site Plan - DBHA Application B. REDUCE BUILDING TO PROPERTY LINE SETBACK
(from 30' 10 20') A O
San S ev a i n e Villas C. REDUCE MINIMUM BUILDING TO BUILDING SEPERATION N O
(from 40' at 3-story-to-3-story to 20'; and from 30' at J
3-story-to-2-story to 17') O
E5CilyCounly2007
Table 2: E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1/112007
------POPULATION--------- ---------------------HOUSING UNITS------- PERSONS
------SINGLE-- ----MULTIPLE-- PER
HOUSE- GROUP MOBILE OCCU- PCT HOUSE-
COUNTYICITY TOTAL HOLD QUARTERS TOTAL DETACHED ATTACHED 2 TO 4 5 PLUS HOMES PIED VACANT HOLD
San Bernardino County _ _
Adelanto 21,139 26051 -- 10881 8304 64491 148 382 823 508 Yd13 1555 3715
Apple Valley 70.297 69.934 3637 24.866 19.322 7261 2,0891 1 1
686 ,043 22,886 7 05
96. 3 6!
Barstow 23 943 23 613 330 9 9495 5241( 356! 1 292 1 662! 7,115 8 261 16 971_ 2858
Big Bear Lake 6 20] 6 182 25, 9,444 7 957J 326 3661 41011 3901 2542 73.08 2432
�.. 111111 7t _ ... .__
Chino 81 224„ 69,730 11.494 - 19.978 14,22 1 952 901f 3.370 528 19,315 3 32 3,610,
Chino Hills 78 6681. 78 51] 1511 22.8531 18 370 1 3781 308 2.111 686 22 433 1 841 3 500
Colton 517971 515- 264` 1fi1971 9607 6021 10631 41101 815 14999 7401_ 34361
Fontana 1816401 181081`` 559 _ 480]51 38243 120BI 16441 5,8211 1,759 45,544 5261 3976.
Grand Terrace 12.38011 12 1714 209 4 515 2 904 191 2651 905 250 4.275 5.321 2,U7:
Hesperia 85 8761 BS 545 3311 27 874 22 557 8931 1 1661 1 95 1 300! 26 071 6 47 3 281
I
Highland 52186, 519461 2401 1fi 525 12382 555` 5981 2,129
867 74991 9281 3465'.
Loma Linda 22 4511 21,4 ii 9641 9 072 3 836 9391 1 310 2 4251 562 8 456 6.79' 2.5411
Montclair 36622 36010 6121 9562 5559] 7581 - 1042 1342 8611 9282 293, 3880
Needles 5759 5748 11� 2892 1533 1101 254 367 628 2.199 2396 2614;
Ontario 172 701 171 6031 1 098' 46 9591 _ 27 5301 3 6491,__ 4.D57 9,512 2,2110 45 2381 3 661.. 3 793;
Rancho Cucamonga 172,331( 1687051 3,6261 544721 351391 30591 1,942 128921 1380 52,771 302 31971
Tweolenine Paolms 2248J0 189 d73 53571 J 68955 _ 34973 - 1,3031 16911 '4445 4543 56933 2258 27d9j
Redlands 71,3751 69.409 1,9 26 527 17 137 9001 2 436 5.135i 919 25 2461 4 83
San
9.
2.717 5733
467
Rialto 99 064 98 260 8041 26 637 18 918 - 566 1 8301 3 500 1,6031 25,221 5 32' 3896
3 3541
Y r _ _ I L_ 2 809,
Upland 75169 74584 585r 26613 15285 1770 267]11 6036' 6451 25655 360, 2907. -
Vlctorvele 102.538
97.322- 5 2161 32 979 261901 369 1 333 328611--
743
286 - 1 7811 30490 7 551 3 192..
Yucaipa Si,7B451212 572 19292 130351 394 7431, ..._._ 893 4,2271 78190 571 28151;
... _ _ .. _ ...._ .. 111111..._ __ ...... _._. .. ... 07,
Yucca Valley 21044] 20733 3111 9463, 7,563, 140; 675, 378j 707, 8,269 12.621 2507;
Balance Of County 295,978 2080671-__ 7911'__ . 128480E 10J,3U1. ._ 4,200E 40841 ,. 22401 14,62E 92,188 28251 3.125
Incorporated 1.732.035 1 689,247 42,]88 548,429 373,313 24649 35,797 85,663 29,607 505,426 7.84 3.342
County Total 2,020,013 1,977314 50,699 676,909 476,647 28,249 39,881 87,903 44,229 597,614 11.71 3 309
t0
N
O
C
-00
v �
z
m o
cn o
California Department of Finance O v
Page 1 of 1 Demographic Research Unit -" r)
-4
M O