The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985/01/16 - Agenda PacketG~.~CAMp,,, 7 ~ 'n n O E V Z c U > 1977 CfCY OF RAITK}VIO ~(-.l~lXVAI~~t~OTNI~Gri~ ,~/~1~1*TTlAt llJ 1 Vl~ii_. Lions Park Co®un ity Ceater 9161 Base Liae Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Jaauarv 16. 1985 - 7:30 o.m. All items ambmitted for the City Cowcil Agenda moat be is mritina. The deadline for anhmitting these ittau is 5:00 p.m. on the Nedmesday prior to the stating. The Ciq Cletk'• Office reeei~ea ^11 sneh i[eu. 1. CALL TO OBDEI • A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Nrigkt _, Buquet _, Mikela _, Dehi _, and Ring _. C. Approval of Ninutee: None Submi[ted 2. AIOIOOOC916R8/PB68ERfATI0118 A. TTursdey, Jenwry 17, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - PARR DBVELOPMENT COlMISSION, Lions Park Co®um ity Center. B. Nedneaday, Jewary 23, 1985, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COlOAISSION MEETING, Liws Yark Community Center. C. Thursday, January 24, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - ADVI80RY COTOIISSION, Library Conference Boom. D. Presentation of proclamation commending Anne Calinaki for her outstanding service to the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station. 8. Preeentet iom o£ Service Award to Sharon Leowrd. C i[y Council Agenda -~Z- January 16, 1985 • 3. COIISER CALM The folloming Comaemt. Calendar itaa are eapeeted to be roatine and moreontroaenial. ThnF sill be acted apon b~ the Coaeil at one tine mithoat diaemaaiom. A. Approval of Narrante, Register No's. 85-01-16 and 1 Payroll ending 1/5/85 for the total amount of 5698,701.87. B. Re levee of Bonds: TRACT 12090 - Located on the east aide of Archibald, 5 north of Feron; owner, USA Prapertiea. Release: Labor and Ma feria le Bood $24,750.00 TRACT 11013 - Located on the east aide of Ame thyat, 5 south of Banyan; owner, Lewis Romea. Accept: Maintenance Bond $17,340.00 Release: Pe ithFul Perfornance Bood $173,400.00 . TRACT 12332-1 - Locs fed on the vest Bide of Raven b Avenue a[ the north City Limits; owner, N.R. Laband. Release: Improvement Security $60,000.00 TRACT 11663 - Located on the east aide of Archibald, 6 south of Church Street; owner, Marlborough Development. Relea ae: Pa ithful Performance Bond 528,000.00 TRACT 12019 - Loca [ed oo Che east side of Archibald, 6 south of Church Street. Release: Fai ChEul Perfornance Bond $31,500.00 R890LUTION N0. 85-07 12 A 3E9G~,OTION OP TRB CITT CODNCIL OP TNS CITY OP RA: ~": ~0 CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING 17IP PUB~.IC IMPR04EMENTS POR TRACT N09. 11013, 12 32-1, 11663 AND 12019 AND AOTRORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE Oa COMPLETION POR Tfl8 NORR C. Approval of recording of Notice of Completion for 13 Rellman Avenue Improvenenta Erom 6th Street to 656 feeC north of 6th. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION FOR A PROPOSED 53 771 000 CERTIFICATE OF RTICIPATION ROGRAM FOR A. H. REI R DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BACKGROUND: In November 1984 the City received an application request for a Lertf icate of Part is ipation rrogram, in the amount of E3,771,000, from A. H. Reiter Oeve lopment Company. The application request is specifically for the assistance in the dev~alcoment of an office complex. Once developed, the project will corsist~of four buildings of approximately 18,000 square feet each. The project site is located at the northeast corner of 1th Street and Haven Avenue. • The application from A. H. Reiter Development Company has Geen examined by both City staff and bond counsel and has been accepted as complete. EVALUATION: The specific project request has been evaluated by City std the benefit of the project to the City. This assessment has shown that the project will be beneficial to the City in several areas. Briefly, these areas include: 1. The project, located on Haven Avenue, will be one of the first developments designed under the recently adopted Haven Avenue Overlay Oistr ict Guidelines. Oue to this, its design and location will help to establish Haven Avenue as the major entranceway into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The design of the complex is considered by Staff to be of high quality and of benefit to Haven Avenue and the City in general. 2. One of the proposed tenant uses fur the office complex is an industrial medical clinic. This is considered by Staff to be both of value and benefit to the City in that the medical clinic will be located in the Industrial Area c~' and will service both existing industrial employees and~d~ all future industrial employees. ai C ~~ S REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT January 16, 1985 Page 2 r1 LJ 3. Approximately two years after the project is completed the employment base to the City is expected to increase by approximately 292 persons. This added employment base will be of a varied type ranging from management, skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled backgrounds. Attached to this staff report is a memorandum prepared by Best, Best & Krieger, bond counsel, for the financing proposal. This memorandum explains how a Certificate of Participation Program functions and the amount of involvement and responsibility of the Agency. As stated in this memorandum, the Agency "acquires" the prof ec*. and immediately "resells" it to the developer pursuant to established ogre aments. it is important to note, however, that even though the Agency "acquires" the project, the project is not taken off the tax rc les and therefore it does not affect the Rgency's taz increment. Also, the Rgency at no time has any liability regarding the construction or the payments of the Certificate obligations. As stated in Best, Best & Krieger's memorandum, all financial liability rests with the developer, and the overall program will he secured by a Letter of Credit from the developer. • At the present time, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has not received a Private Activity Bond Allocation from the State of California. This is expected to occur in the latter part of January 1985. At that point in time it will be necessary for the City to transfer that allocation to the Agency in order to proceed with the Certificate of Participation f inane ng program. This application does receive priority in that it is the first completed application received and which does show substantial benefit to the City. Preliminary information has ind icatd that the amount which is expected to be received is comparable to this request. It should be possible, therefore, for the Agency to service this Certificate Program request from the initial State allocation. RECOMMENDRTION: Staff recommends that the Rancho Cucamonga edevel~-lopment Agency adopt the attached Inducement Resolution which pertains to the Civic Center Associates application request. Resp ~ctful ll~ ~{b~mitt~ed Community Development Director JL:LD:ns Rttachments: Memorandum from Best, Best & Krieger Inducement Resolution MDlication 1 1, I.w DF FILES OF BES T,BEST 6 KRIEGER • M E M O RAND U M T0: CHAIRhLAN, AGENCY MEMBERS AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM: BOND COUNSEL DATE: JEuYUARY 2, 1985 RE: CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION FINANCING OF A. H, REITER DEVELOPMENT CO. COMMERCIAL PROJECT Staff has received a proposal from the A. H. Reiter Development Co. (the "Developer") for the Agency's assistance in the tax-exempt financing of the acquisition and construction of four office buildings (the "Project") proposed to be located at 7th and Haven in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. • The Developer has submitted an application and financial statements in connection with the Project, which have been reviewed. A tax-exempt financing mechanism that Che Agency may make available to the Developer is an installment sale financing arrangement, including the issuance of certificates of participation. Under this financing arrangement, the Agency would "acquire" the Project from a third-party seller pursuant to an installment sale agreement (the "First Installment Sale Agreement") and immediately "resell it" to the Developer pursuant to an identical second installment sale agreement (the "Second Installment Sale Agreement"). 3 lAw OG GEC ES OG BES T. BE5T6 KRIEGER January 2, 1985 Page 2 Certificates of participation ("Certificates") would then be prepared and sold which would evidence proportionate interests in the cbligation of the Agency to make installment payments under the First Installment Sale Agreement for the purpose of providing funds for the acquisition and construction of the Project. The obligation of the Agency to make such installment payments would be a limited obligation and would entail no financial Liability on the part of the Agency. The sole responsibility for repayment would rest with the Developer, who would have an identical obligation to make installment payments under the Second Itt stallment Sale Agreement. It is • likely that this obligation of the Developer would be further secured by a letter of credit or other "security enhancement" device from a lending or credit institution for the purpose of enhancing the marketability of the Certificates. In the event the Agency is willing to consider making this financing mechanism available to the Developer, it is first necessary for [he Agency to adopt a resolution indicating its intent to issue such Certificates or other similar tax-exempt obligations. This is a requirement of federal tax Law relating to these types of tax-exempt obligations. This tax provision states that a developer • y LIW OFFICES OF BES T.BEST 6 KRIEGER • January 2, 1985 Page 3 may only use tax-exempt monies for costs paid or incurred for a project after the date of the adoption of such a resolution of intention. Attached for your consideration is a proposed resolution of intention which satisfies this federal tax requirement, Adoption of this resolution does not obligate the Agency to proceed with the issuance of certificates of participation if, at some later time, it decides that it would be undesirable to do so. Rather, adoption of this resolution is only a preliminary step in connection with the financing of the Project. • Prior to the issuance of the Certificates, a number of other things must occur. First, the Developer will have to proceed to finalize a financing package with an underwriter and a credit institution, Second, it will be necessary to secure an allocation from the California Debt Limit Allocation Consnittee for the Certificates. The Tax Reform Act of 1984 imposes a requirement that the total dollar amount of all private activity bonds, such as the Certificates that are proposed to be issued, will not exceed Limits imps sed by that law. The City of Rancho Cucamonga presently is awaiting its allocation from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee for 1985, In the event this allocation is not sufficient to r .S LAW OFFICES OF BEST.BEST 6 KRIEGER January 2, 1985 • Page 4 cover the financing of ,the Project (and any other such projects proposed for tax-exempt financing in the City), it will be necessary to obtain an additional allocation, either from another local jurisdiction ur from the State. John £. Brown Francis J. Baum u • C C IPID'JSTRIAL DEVELOP}t Ei]T PROGRAM Summary of Procedures and Application I. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPPt"c NT AUTF:ORITY CITY OF RANCRO CUCAf10NGA Piovem6er 1984 rI ^ ~,~ Industrial Develo~.art 9o nds Under the California Industrial Development Fira ncinq Act which' became effective in 1981, Industrial Development Authorities may issue tax e:<empt bonds to help cualified business interests finance projects. These bonds are not guaranteed by the state or locality but are backed by the c_'editwo rthiness of the firm obtaining the financing. Public Ber.ef it Factors which will be considered in determining whether the proposed project serves the public good include: number of permanent private sector jobs created or saved; amount of energy and natural resource conservation achieved; fiscal impact on government; degree of environme r.tal impact created; and consumer benefits resulting from improved supply, products and services. Financinc Li-ita tions The maxi-,um a.:,ount of a bond issue cannot exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000). In determining this maximum amount, IRS requlati ons require that all capital expenditures made by the applicant ir. the jurisdiction where the project is located in the six year period beginning three years prior and ending three years follcwi rq the issuance of the bonds, must be counted. There are two exceptions to this requirement: a) if the amount of industrial development bond (ICB) • f ina rc ing requested is less than S1 million or b) i_° all the proceeds frcm the sale of a bond issue will be used to finance part of a oroj ect with the balance of the funding for that project coming from an Urban Development Action Grant (U.D.A.G.) made under Section 119 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. in this case, the maximum aggregate capital expenditures allowed for the same six year period increase from 510 million to 520 million. Recent chances in federal law impose additional restrictions on the use of bond proceeds and the maximum aggregate amount of bond financing a company may use. Authority staff are available to discuss these changes and how they may affect a specific project. Industrial Development Bonds are normally secured by the assets to be financed and the credit of the company. Letters of Credit issued by major banks and IDB insurance can be used tc increase the marketability of these bonds and to secure better terms. Finding investors (purchasers of the bonds or lenders) is the sole responsibility of the applicant. The Authority does help by providing leads and other ar,~.vice. Qualifying Activities The following is a summary listinc, of activities eligible for this type of funding. A complete listing of such activities may be found in subsEl ,ion 91:03 of *_he State G ~.r went Code. Industrial (Processing of products of agric uLtuze, forestry, mining, manufacture) - assembly - fabrication - manufacture - processing - research and development - truck to rni nals - warehouses Energy - collection - conservation - conveyance - development - production - storage - transm l.sslon - traIISpOrtdtlOn --Oualifvine Activities - any activities undertaken by persons qualifying as exempt persons under Section SO1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. .~ _ air or water pollution control activities- airporc, dock, wharf, mass commuting, parking activities, storage and related activities. - convention or trade show activities. - ird~s trial park development activities. - residential real property for Family units or other housing activities. - sewage or soti3 waste disposal activities or electric energy or qas furnishing activities, except any such activities described in the above energy section. - sports activities. - telephone or community television furnishing activities. - water furnishing activities. PROCEDURES The following is an outline of the basic steps prescribed by the State taw to process an application through the Authority. 1, Applicant has an initial consultation with the staff of the Authority. If indications seem positive, staff issues the application. 2. The staff will accept a completed application for review and make a preliminary determination of public benefit criteria and other provisions of law. It will next present its report and its findings to the Author ity• Acceptance of the application and fee in no way obligates the Authority to undertake the project. 9 3. If, on the i~ .,is of review under step ~ the Authority makes an affirmative determination, the Authority will: a) certify the application; b) make a finding of public benefit; c) file a cony of the certified application with the City Council; and d) publish a notice stating acceptance of the application and the filing with the City Council which will hold a public hearing on the project. The notice names the app)icant, summarizes the project, states the maximum amount of the bond issue and specifies the date, time and location o£ the public hearing. Such notice is required by both State and Federal law (TEFRA). 4. Upon completion of the above steps, the City Council, within 45 days, must tare an action to approve or disapprove the project. 5. Once the City Council approves the project, the City Clerk certifies the Council's action and transmits the application with all supportive materials and studies, back to the Authority staff. . 6. next, the application, together with the required State fees and any additional information needed, will be transmitted t~ the CiCF AC for its review. CIDFAC, chaired by the State Treasurer, has sixty (60) days from receipt of application to make a Bete rm ina do r. of approval or disapproval. Such aeproval or disapproval will he made on the basis o£: a) TF.e public benefits of the project; h) whether oz not the project or its operations will result in the substantial relocation or abandonment of other vac ilities within the State; and c) Eligi6ili~ty of the project under the State enabling legislation, and specific conditions relating to financial, credit worthiness and other such character- istics of the Uond issue and its sale. 7. CIDFAC acts on the project application. 8. If the Authority, City Council and CIDFAC have all approved the project, and a minimum of 30 days from the filing of public notice has elapsed, the Authority by resolution approves the project agreements with the applicant. Project agreements are contracts between the Authority and the applicant to help ensure compliance with all requirements of the financing. • 9. The transaction closes and the bonds are issued and sold. ~a Office Use On1v Application No. E'4-CI • Date Received A~p~/. ,p, , '%~-- Date Approved INDUSTRIP.L DEVELC?>ENT AGTHO RZ TY OF THE CITY OF RA::CY.O CUC?.?OSGA PROJECT ELIGIBILITY REV IE41 The info rnation requested on this form is necessary to process a request for financial assistance from the Industrial Deve lonment Authority of the City of Rancho Cucrtnonga (the Authority). Fill in all the blanks us iag "YOi;E" or "10T F~PPLICABLE" where appropriate. If figures orovid ed are es tizates, indicate: "EST" after figure. If more space is needed for any specific answer: to a question, use a separate sheet. The inforr,.- atica recuired may 6e waived at the discretion of the Secretary or assista rt Seereta ry of the Authority. Return two (2) signed copies with a ttac!:-eats of this application to: Ind~~strial Development Authority of the City of Rancho Cucar..onga c/o Com.:.unity Development Department Post Office Sax 807 -• Ra r.c ho Cuc ar,.o rga, California 91730 I. IDE:dTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICANT A. Ce^,oany Identification 1. Official Company Name: A. H. REITER DEVELOPMENT CO. Official Mailing Address: P.O. Box 7250 Newport Beach, CA 92658-7250 Telephone: (714) 751-4594 2. Business Organization: Corporation-, Partnership- Sole Proprie torshio X_, or Other__ (describe) Is the Company X owned by an individual a subsidiary affiliated directly or indirectly with any other organization? !/ Pace iwo l If a corporation, list state of incorporation N/A and date qualified b do husi Hess in California N/A If a partnership, list name of partre rship N/A and date of aareener.*_ N/A If a subsidiary or affiliated with another coa:nany give name N/A and brief state- r,.ert of affiliation or relationship N/A 3. Of cers Na:.e and Ho-ie address Other Business Affiliations Presid en.t August H. Reiter, III None 2039 Vista Cajon Newport Beach, CA 92660 vice President None • Secretary None Treasurer None COntLOLler None Directors None • /1 Page Three i t 4.. List name and home address of equity owners of I09 or more. If partnership, ,list general and limited • partners and interest owned by each. If trust, list beneficiaries. $ of Equity Name Aome Address Interest 0•wned A. H. REITER, III 2039 Vista Cajon 1008 Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. For publicly-held corporations, show stock exchange on which listed. If traced over the counter, or on NASDAQ, please list the carket makers: None s. Coapany Description 1. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code No. of Conpany: 6511 2. Descziption of principal products andlor services: Real estate operator and lessor of non-residential buildings ~3. List number of current full gad part-time employees, and payroll, by skill category. None. 4. Description o£ company's physical facilities: _ Shaced office facilities at 3188 Pullman, Costa Mesa, CaliEOrnia 92626 l , i3 7age Four r Financial statements (a ttaeh as exhibits) Three copies of each of the following: , A- For publicly held companies: N/A • Copies of the annual report to stockholders for each of the last three years; copies of ary regis- tration statements, prospectuses and 30-K's filed each tote Securities and Exchange Commission within applicanttselast l0~ree years; and conies of the Q and mast recent 8-K. B• For all other companies: a. History and brief description of the appli- cant, any guarantor, and any subsidiaries, including type of products manufactured, present and future markets and prospects. The applicant has been developing non-residential real estate in the Rancho Cucamonga area since 1977. Through his office and industrial parks he presently provides leased space to such municipal, city and federal tenants as the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department (6,000 square feet), the City of Rancho Cucamonga (12,000 square feet), the Alta Loma School District (6,500 square feet) and the U.S. Post Of~e In addition the applicant is presently providing leased space to professionals in the community including doctors, dentists, veterinarians, lawyers and accountants and to many mid-sized -and small industrial tenants. These developments and their tenants have been instrumental in creating an industrial and professional back bone for the growth of the residential community of Rancho Cucamonga. b. Resume of management and ownership, including age, business experience, length of asaoeia- tion with company, salary and other compensa- tion, and directors with outside affiliations. The applicant is wholly owned by A.H. Reiter III. Mr. Reiter is presently 43 years of age and has had approximately 20 years experience in,the real estate industry, He started in the real estate industry as a construction laborer, then carpenter and super- intendant. Approximately 8 years ago he became involved in real estate development and has completed individually, or through partnerships, in excess of 700,000 square feet of concrete tilt-up buildings for industrial and office tenants, He anticipate continued growth within the next 5 years of addit~] 300,000 square feet of industrial and office buildings ~y Page Five c. Description of any pending litigation. Applicant is involved in no material pending litigation. d., Copies of audited fiscal year-end statements for preceding three years. Copies of audited financial year-end statements Eor the preceding three years are not available. Applicant provides herewith unaudited financial statements for the years ending 1983 and 1982. The statements were prepared by applican t's. accountants following generally accepted accounting principles. e. Interim Financial statements for periods within sixty days of the application. Copies of interim financial statements are unavailable at this time. Applicant represents that there has been no substantial change in the financial position of the applicant as set forth in the unaudited statement provided for the period ending December 31, 1983. 6. Financial Projections Include a schedule showing the company's debt require- . ments and its ability to service same (cash flow) for three years from the date of th b d e on iss _a. The schedule should be detailed by months the first year and by quarters for the two succeeding years. The following Financial projections are limited to the bond issue project. iNCOMP• PROJECTION: Rental Income $.75/ sq.ft. x 76,000 sq.ft. _ $~57;000 month _ $684,000 annual Total Debt: $3,771,000 loan Snteres t: based @.1142 amortization _$ 430,648 l_J /i Rental Expenses: Taxes Landscape water s Sewer Management Maintenance vacancy First Year Zncome Second Year 5725,000 Third Year 5761,250 II. C01T ACT I1T'OFixlATION rage Six $ 41,000 11,340 3,600 27,360 6,840 34,200 $124,340 Net Proceeds: =5129,012 Expenses Debt Service $130,557 $430,648 =$163,759 $137,084 $430,648 =$193,554 • ;,. O::icer to whom all notices and communications concerning the project should be sent: Name: August A. Reiter, III address: 3188 Pullman, Costa t~tesa, CA 92626 Telephone: (714) 751-4594 B. Lecal counsel to applicant: John M. Meindl, Esq. Name: HARWOOD, ADKINS ON 6 9ERNAVER Address: P.O. Box 1907, Newport Beach, CA 92663 Telephone: (714) 644-1313 C~ P aqe seven C. ~ri.nGlJSI bank )5) wl~ IIa:°_5 221E DDCne nu:.be_s. of coatar_s .here. • Na>ne: First Inters`a .e Sank _ Coataet: N.r. nark Whale_z Ad~ess: 3000 Sirch Street Phone: 714/558-5129 Newport Beach, CA 926b0 N2mac COIItaC: Adcress: ~ Phone: D. Tadenendeat aceorataat .or a?nlican t2' ~~ P~ awe; ~1Cenaeth 3,evea:hal s Co. Coatact.l''_. Michael F.7rzbr en~ury ra:x oast AcL--ess: 2os Angeles, CF 90067 ,213/277-0880 Tele~haae: E. As a condition of the project agreement the Authority may request the independent certified public accountants of the applicant to furnish a comfort letter covering the period • frcm the last report Late until the closing of ehe bond transaction. As a further condition, the Authority may also request the ' Company's independent certified public accountants to annually, in connection with their examination of financial statements, furnish a letter of compliance with the project agreements and with the cox„pany's representations on in- creased employment. /7 Page Eight _ III. DESC%:?^:ON O? T~ ??O.iZC" • ~.. ?rojec= lota:ic- anc s_== _: __-.motion !. Acd: ess: Northeast corner of 7th Street and Haven Avenue. - Rancho Cucamonga, California c. Size a: site: 5.o acres (480~x 490) :. Desc^oacn o`_ ~~__ - -orovs^_eas ua the sane, _:-'_uc - ace, use an,. size, ~.c_ude picz_ces, i= acailz: le vacant lct recen~?v arooed ~.dth all o'f sites in place with the exception of sidewalks along 7th Street. S. Esti.;,ated nse=ul li.e of builci.Zgs and/or ecui»ent:• 30 vear - life of buildinv 5. Brief explanation why Applicant is undertaking project: Applicant desires to develop and construct high quality office space in an area which consists largely of distribution and warehousing facilities. This project will enable the applicant to attract engineering and research facilities and growth oriented companies requiring skilled employment. Also, the applicant believes that his investment in the redevelopment area will stimulate and attract other uses and investment compatible to the redevelopment plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and thereby over the long teem inccea~ the value of applicant's property and the surrounding property. /8 Paqe Nine ~ ~ f~ t s. Ownership t 1. Does Applicant own site? ves X no. 2. If no, describe lease arrangements, options or other evidence of Applicant's permission to use site, or plans to acquire site. Applicant has been grant,.d an option to purchase the site. The term of the option is 12 months commencing December 1, 1984. 3.. Please attach copies of any credit agreeaent, debt indenture or other instruments which in any way .limit Applicant's indebtedness or affect the sale, leasing, acquisition oz use of property or Applicant's proposed operations at the project. - A copy of the Option~Agreement will be provided prior to to December 19, 1984 Industrial Development Authority meeting. 4. Nave and address of broker(s) involved, if applicable: `joie. C. Proposed Project I. 'l~ ~e of project (new facility, expansion, renovation, or acquisition) describe in detail: The proposed project will 6e the construction of 4 office buildings. The development site is located on the northeast corner of Aaven Avenue at 7th Street. The site is currently vacant except for completed offsite development (excluding sidewalks). When completed, each building will be approximately 18,000 square feet and will be designed to conform within the concepts of the recently adopted Aaven Overlay District. As yet undetermined entities other than the applicant will use the proposed facilities. The applicant has already received inquiries by existing tenants which require larger and newer facilities. In addition, discussions are pending with an industrial medical facility which could utilize up to 7,500 square feet Eor its serving of the increased medical requirements of industry in this area, 2. Estimate time required for construction: Starting date April 1, 1985 Completion date~~Sept. 30, 1985 /9 ?age Ten Pri.^.cipzl products, uses znd activities to be Financed (include SIC code): • Development, construction, op2ratio r. end leasa of office buildings (SIC Code i 6511) D. Eligibility of project uses - A statement of eligibility of the project for financing under Section 91503 of the Act. Attach a letter from bond counsel attesting to the project's eligibility: A letter from bond counsel attesting to the project's eligibility will be provided prior to the December 18, 1984 Industrial Development Authority meeting. E. Public Approvals/Permits F.ave alI requized permits, licenses and other public appro- vals, (iIR, Conditional use permit, general plan compliance, public works, zoning, local, state and federzl zegulations) beer. obtained? yes X no. If no, please show status and expected resolution-incomplete activity. .r. ^co'°ct has been approved by Design Review at its Noventer 20, 1984 meeting. The project was then placed in the ?lar..^.i c? Commission agenda for December 12, 1984. Subject [o ap prova: of the project by the City of Rancho Cucamonga • ?Lanni ng Commission the project will he submitted to the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for its meeting on December 19, 1984 and adoption of inducement resolutions. Applicant is advised that the zoni nn and proposed use of this project conform to the Redevelopment Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. No applications for building permits are pending. Bond Counsel on pzoposed project: Firm name: Best, Best 5 Krieger Attn: o n row , q. Address: 4200 orange ~S treet, Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: ( 7141 686-1450 G. Please indicate the estimated capital expenditures during the last three years which were made in the political juris- diction (city or unincorporated county), of the proposed project for facilities used by the Applicant, or any other proposed occupant o£ the project 51,850,000 Were any of these expenditures financed by issuance of industrial development bonds? oyes X no. If yes, please describe • ~^. 7 ~ ~ Pace ELaven H. Hzs the applicant used industrial development bonds to • finance projects anywhere in the U.S.? Yes No X ghat is the total amount o: all such bonds issued or currently pending? $ N/A IV. COSTS OF THE PROJECT State the ccsts necessary for the a cquisition of the site and ccnstruction of the proposed project together with any ma chinery and ecvipment in connection therewith, including utilities, access reads, and appurtenant facilities, A. PRICE OF EXISTI`iG LAND AND BUILDINGS 1. Lard S 925,000 2. Building $ -0- 3. Fees and other chances $ -0- related to this sale Total $ 925,000 B, CC*.:ST?.UC'=ION COSTS 1. Architectural and engineering $ 55,000 2. Site pzeparation S 173,000 ' 3. M.a aerials S 95,000 • 4. Labor S. Pav:ag and Landscaping S 1.100.000 $ 76 000 6. Utilities connection . S 22.000 7, Miscellaneous (itemize) S -0- Total $ 2,376,000 C. M.ACNINERY Atr'D EQUIPI4ENT New 1. Invoice cost $ N/A 2, Ins talla tidn $ N A 3. Miscellaneous (itemize) $ N/A Total S -0- Used T- Invoice cost $ N/A 2. Installaticn $ N A 3, Miscellaneous (itemize) $ N/A Total $ -0- D. INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION (From 2185 To 7/85) $ 170,000 E, FINANCING, LEGAL, MISC£LLnNEOUS (PLEASE SPECIFY) $ 175,000 F, CONTINGENCY (if appropriate) .... ............,.., ..5_ 125,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST ......$ 3,771,000 Page T•oe lve ~ 1' MAXIMUM A."SOUNT OF IDH FI::ANCZ;:G REQUESTED • $ '{,700.000 Note: Project costs may not include working capital; moving expenses; inventory financing; or assumption, repa}~ent, or refinancing of existing indebtedness other than ccnstruetion loans. V, DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ISSti ANCE OF THE 601DS A. Type of placement: Private:. (anticipated) Public: Nego tinted: _ B. Proposed terms of the bonds years. To be determined by underwriter. C. Indicate method of Einan tiny: 1. Loan of bond proceeds by Authority to Applicant 2. Le-~^ of facilities by Authority to Applicant 3. Installment sale of facilities by Authority to • Aop'_icant Other 4. Sale o Cert: ;cares o anticipation. D. Indicate the collateral for the bonds and the method of payment; identify revenues to be used for debt service: • Land and lease payments. E. Identify the proposed purchaser of the bonds, underwriter or placement agent for the Applicant: Na:ne of purchaser: Stone 6 Youngberg Officer or partner: Scott Sollers Adr.ress: One California Stzee t, San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 981-1314 Attach a copy of tentative commitment letter from suc~ prospective purchaser or tentative agreement with underwrite or placement agent. Tentative commitment letter to be provided by underwriter. ?1 i~ 'Pane ~ 'fhlrteen .. ( f F. Will the b\onds be issues in exchaange :or one or sore outstanding bonds, or sis`.lr: claims, oz party in such • exchange and party for cash or property? __yes x no I_ yes, describe exc*snae or re'~yzdinq. VZ. D=SC:~I??ION OF ?II3LIC 2EN3If'S Benefits which would accrue `_rom undertaking the project, pursuant to cr'_teria eoz.ained in section 91502.1 (I° applicable, iaforma- tion in ~,-*.is section is to ba Given for both the Anplicann cad a= other entities that wiL be principal users o: the facilities). .+. =:plovment bene_its 1. indicate °ull-ti.e e-plo}-„snt anc payroL fer various catscories: %.~ ?roier_ Upon Cosp i=_..cc 1 Fezr Alter 2 Fears After c: _~ eV ~- o= _oieec Ccr..nletion Comolenon s ~ 5 5 a 5 ~'3_leC e_-le^t ,_ -0- 25 62S.OOn ~_ 7so.ooo ~. aoo.oao S.i_le_ -o- Ser.~-sk'__1ec -0- U:skilled _ -0- Total lso 2 700.000 25 350,000 5 60,000 175 3.150,000 30 420,110 200 3,500,000 40 660,000 15 150,000 20 200,000 -0- 205 3;725,000 X50 4,,470,110 2.92 5,060,000 2. If pax:-time workers will be employed, at:zch deserip- :ion aS .above. N/A ' 3. Estimate, ]S applicable, increased esmloyment and payrpll in related and service fields due to ibe comale- tion of the project. ' Undetermined at th i~s time. ~J 23 Page Fourteen i l 4. Indicate, if applica. le, anticipated it„pact of t~ prcposed r.ew jobs or. orobler.s o: severe ure^=loyment o the hardcore unemplcyed. N/A 5. Decumen t, if applicable, that the completion of the prof ect will retain jots that would otherwise be lost. N/A 8. Resource Conservation (if applicable) 1. Explain and document any estimated conservation of energy, mineral or natural or cultivated resources arising out of the project. The project will comply with Title 24 conservation requirements and codes. 2. Explain and document any reduction of waste, improvement or" recovery or intersif ication of utilization of re- sources that otherwise would be less intensively uti- lized, wasted or not recovered. N/A C. Co..^sumer benefits (if applicable) 1. Explain and document the improvement of cuality or q•.:antity of products, energy or related services by virtue of completion o= the project. N/A D_ Other Benefits 1 2. Will project contribute to the improvement of detr • cereal environmental factors? x yes no. If yes, attach description. Landscapr'ng, lighting and overall apeeatance of area will be greatly improved. Will project contribute to the revitalization of a deteriorated area oz will it increase economic useful- ness of an area? _yes _no. T!!e project Will result in revitalization of an area that has deteriorated for the past several years. It will commence changes in the area from an established warehouse and distribution facilities use to office use. At this time the estate fished use of the surrounding area has relatively little impact on employment increases. This project will, even for its relative small size, Increase employment and establish a new and different economic stimulus within the redevelopment area. It will also improve the appearance of the area. 3. Estimate any inceeased local and state taxes, fees and other revenues due to the completion of the project. To be provided by City staEE. 4. Estimate any decreases of public service costs by virtue of completion of the project (such as decreased welfare. or unemployment costs). To be provided by City sta Ef. ~'v ... page Fifteen ` ~! VII. A DESCRIPTION OF ANY PUBLIC DETRI^!ENT FROD! ISSUANCE ~OF BONDS • IN THE MAXII;UM AMOUNT PROPOSED i:7 THi APPLICATION A. Employment displacement - will the completion of the project contribute to job displacements (such as resulting from site clearance or demise of competing firms? _yes ~ x no. If yes, attach description. B. Energy, mineral or natural o: cultivated resource i^pact will the completion of the project lend to increased utilization of scarce resources? _yes X ne. If yes, attach description. 1, Estimate of increased utilization o: resources. 2. Estimate of increases in cost to the pub lie due to increased utilization. C. Dces construction of the proje-~, - completion of the project have any adverse enviro.-unental impacts, including acid iticnal waste disposal? _yes ~_no. If yes, attach description. 1. Estimate of environr..ental impacts. 2. Include copies of any required envirorr.,ental impact ;• reports. D. Econcmic impact on the city, county and/or state. 1. Estimate types and costs of new public services required by the project. None 2. Analysis of the costs to the city, county and.or state for public improvements includinc utility, street improvements, traffic control enhancement, and the cost of financing such improvements. N/A VIII. A DESCRIPTION. IF APPLICABLE. OF TBE STATEN 70 F. 571.8 aNn t.nram•rnv A. A listing of the current statewide operations of the Appli- cant including size, location, number of employees and payroll. 1. Cucamonga Business Park a. Situated at southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. b. The project consists of 16-1/2 acre industrial business center. c. No employees. 1~ Page Sixteen 1^ 2. Baseline Business Center • a. Situated at Baseline and Rellman in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, b. The project consists of a 4-1/4 acre business park. c. C]o employees. 3. San Jacinto Business Park a. Situated at Sta to Street and Esplanade in the City of San Jacinto. b. The project consists of an 8.78 acre industrial business park. c. No employees. 3. A listing of the statewide operations of the Applicant upon completion of the project, including size, location, number of employees and payroll. Same as A above, and in addition, the subject project. C. A listing of the statewide operations of the Applicant two • years alter completion of the project, including size, location, number of employees and payroll. At this time the Applicant is unable to determine additional projects that will be on line in two years. D. Relocation - If financing is requic ed for relocation of a facility within the State of California, documentation that the relocation is due to one of the following: N/A u ~~ ?age Seventeen i ~` 1. An inadequacy of the existing facility. ., • 2. A significant chance in the firm's operations that would require a different location. 3. A building mozator i~.:m where the existing facility is located. 4. The existing lease is expiring and cannot be renewed under economic conditions. 5. An economic need to move closer to the firm's customers or suppliers. 6. Oth er_ IX. I:•:PORTaST ?iOTICE TO APPLICaHT Approval for financial assista roe by the _Tndus trial Development authority of the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga is determined by the information presented in this application. Any changes in the status of the proposed project from the facts presented herein and the exhibits attached could disqualify the project and cause it to be ineligible for financial assistance. ~In general, commencement of construction or any award of contract, including equipment, or the execution of any contract for the final acquisition of the • proposed project, prior to adartion of ar. inducement resolution by the Authority where such construction or ac gvis ition is to be financed by a tax-exempt issue, is likely to result in the application being ineiig ible for approval. The law recuires that on any project which received preliminary approval from the Authority, after January 1, 1983, and which involves construction, improvements, reconstruction, or rehabili- tation to be financed in whole or in part by bonds issued pursuant to this program, all workers employed in such work, exclusive of maintenance work, shall be paid not less than the general prevail- ing rate of per diem wages far work of a similar character in the locality in which the work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. Those rates shall be determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with the stan- dards set forth in Section 1773 of the Labor Cade. The Director's determination shall be final, and Sections 1773.1, 1773.5, 1774 and 1776 (excepting subdivision (f) ) of the Labor Code shall apply. C J ~7 Pace Eighteen T::e Authority further requires that the coc.oany com_u'_y with t requirer..e nts of section 2805 of the California Labor Ccde and tY.e California Fair Employment and Housing Act and the regulations pzcr,.u lgated thereunder and may recuire t e company to develop a program to insure compliance with regard to em~lovment practices at the project, which program shall be satin:actory to the Authority. In connection with said program, the applicant company shall design, develop and implement prccedures, maintain files and collect data so as to permit the independe rt certified public accountant of the apolicar.t to report annually on the applicant 'company's compliance with said program. ' X. CERTIF ZCATION Zt is hereby represented and certified by the undersigned that to the best knowledge and belief o' the undersicned, the ir.f ormation cc.-,tain ed herein and attac::ed hereto is accezate and correct and truly descriptive of the project, the applicant and ar,y guarantor or other proposed project user. APPLICANT: A.H. E E Pt CO. By; • ust Biter, III Titles Owner /~a&'- $ oATEn: , i ~. RESOLUTION N0. LF es "'-~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INDICATING ITS INTENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF OBLIGATIONS tVND THE INSTALLMENT SALE FINANCING OF A CO~tERCIAL PROTECT BY A. H. REITER DEVELOPMENT CO. [:HEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Agency") is authorized pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, being Section 33000 and following of the Haalth and Safety Code of the State of California (the "AcC") (i) to purchase property, both real and personal, and any interest therein for purposes of redevelopment in a redevelopment project area; (ii) to sell or otherwise dispose • of any property, both real and personal, and any interest therein for purposes of redeye lopmenc in a redevelopment project area; and (iii) to make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercise of its powers; and WHEREAS, A. H. Reiter Development Co. (the "Developer") has requested assistance in the financing of the acquisition and construction of four office buildings each containing approximately 18,000 square feet proposed to be located on 5.6 acres at the northeast corner of 7th and Flaven (the "Project"), all located in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area of the Agency (the "Project Area"); and ~~ WHEREAS, said financing is aroposed to be provided • by means of the Agency entering into an installment sale arrangement with respect to the Project, including the issuance of certificates of participation or by means of the Agency otherwise issuing tax-exemot obligations (said certificates or obligations being coliect i•:ely referred to as the "Obligations"); WHEREAS, the Agency, in order to encourage economic development and employment opportunities within the Project Area and as an aid and inducement to the Developer, is willing to authorize the issuance of the Obligations in an amount sufficient to provide financing for the Project subject to the restrictions of the Act and all applicable California • and federal laws as they presently exist, provided that the Project receives all necessary local governmental approvals of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1. Findings. This Board hereby determines that the undertaking of the financing of the Project by the Agency will be a substantial factor in the accrual of public benefits to be received from the Project, should the Project be approved and constructed, and that the proposed financing is in accord with the purposes and requirements of the Act. -2- • 30 Section 2. Issuance of Obligations. Subject to the completion of the proceedings and other matters relating thereto to the full satisfaction of this Board, and subject to the Project receiving all necessary local governmental approvals, this Board hereby agrees to provide financing to the Developer or such other person or entity approved by the Agency for the Project through the issuance of Obligations as described in this resolution in an amount not to exceed $3,771,000. Section 3. Nature of Obligations. The Obligations to be issued shall be soecial obligations of the Agency payable solely from installment payments or other revenues • to be received by the Agency pursuant to all agreements (including any installment sale agreement with the Developer) in connection with the financing of the Project, all in a form acceptable to the Agency, and shall not be a general obligation of the Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof. Section 4. Official Action. It is intended that this Resolution shall constitute "some other similar official action" toward the i~~uance of indebter^o;~ •,~ithin the meaning of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. u -3- ?/ Section 5. Other Aonrovals. The adoption of this • Resolution shall not bind the Agency to issue certificates of participation, bonds or other obligations until and unless all other necessary actions and approvals are taken or received in accordance with all applicable laws. The adoption of this Resolution does not and shall not limit in any manner whatever the Agency's and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's full discretion to deny any further permit or approval that ma;~ be necessary for ultimate completion of the proposed Project. In this connection: (a) A11 contracts relating to the a~~;u isition, construction, installation and equipping of the Project shall be solicited, negotiated, a:uarded and executed • by the Developer, for its own account, subject to applicable federal, state and local laws. (b) The Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall have no pecuniary liability to the Developer for any fees in connection with the Project. (c) The Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall recover any and all costs to the Agency or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as applicable, which are incurred in furtherance of or attributable to the issuance of the Obligations. If the 061igations are not issued, all such costs shall be paid by the Developer. -4- C , J 3> • Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. AUOPTED this day of January, 1985. ATTEST: Chairman o the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Secretary o the Re deve opment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California r1 U -5- 33 I, LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, Secretary of the • Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of January, 1985, by the following vote of the Agency: AYES: NOES: A&SENT: ABSTAINED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aff'_xed the official seal of the Redevelopment Agency of the • City of Rancho Cucamonga, California this day of January, 1985. Secretary o the Redeye opment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California -6- • 3y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOC REDEVELOPMENT AGENC' STAFF REPORT n GATE: January 16, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION FOR A PROPOSED E1 900 000 CERTIFICATE OF P RTICIPAT ION PROGR M FOR C VIC CEN R RS SOC CATES BACKGROUND: In December 1984 the City received an application request for a Certificate of Participation Program, in the amount of $1,900,000 from Civic Center Associates. The application request is specifically for the assistance in the development of a 20,000 square foot two-story office building. The project is located on the south side of Civic Center Drive and east of Haven Avenue which is directly across from the planned City Hall/Civic Center complex and the Law and Justice Center. The application from Civic Center Associates has been examined by both City staff and Bond Counsel and has been accepted as complete. EVALUATION: The specific project request has been evaluated by City staff as to the benefit of the project to the City. This assessment has shown that the project will be beneficial to the City in several areas. Briefly, these areas include: 1. The project, located in proximity to the proposed Civic Center complex, will help to enhance the establishment and development of the area between Foothill Boulevard, Arrow Highway and Haven Avenue. The building i5 of a high quality design and will add to the appearance and integrity of the Civic Center complex Brea. 2. The proposed primary tenant use of the building is for legal and judicial offices. This will be of direct benefit to the area and specifically the Law and Justice Center which is presently under construction. 3. The increased employment base to the City of about 80 C~~ persons from the managerial and support office staff which will he working in the proposed office building. ~' ~ 3s REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT January 16, 1985 Page 2 • Attached to this staff report is a memorandum prepared by Best, Best and Krieger, Bond Counsel for the financing proposal. This memorandum explains how a Certificate of Participation Program functions and the amount of involvement and responsibility of the Agency. As stated in this memorandum, the Agency "acquires" the project and immediately "resells it" to the developer pursuant to established agreements. It is important to note, however, that even though the Agency "acquires" the project, the property is not taken off the tax rolls and therefore does not affect the Agency's tax increment. Also, the Agency at no time has any liability regarding the construction or the payments of the certificate obligations. As stated in Best, Best and Krieger's memorandum, all financial liability rests with the developer and the overall program will be secured by a Letter of Credit from the developer. At the present time the City of Rancho Cucamonga has not received a Private Activity Bond allocation from the State of California. Thi is expected to occur in the latter part of January 1985. At that point in time it will be necessary for the City to transfer that allocation to the Agency in order to proceed with the Certificate of Participation • financing program. In the event that the initial allocation does not meet the total amount requested, it is possible far the City to seek transfers of unused allocations from the County of San Bernardino or any local agency. To date, verbal communication with the County has shown that a commercial project of this type is considered a "low priority" in terms of being considered for a transfer of allocation. Should the City be unable to obtain the necessary transfer, from either the County or another local agency, it will not he possible for the Agency to service the Certificate Request. RECOMMENDATIOPI: Staff recommends that the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency adopt the attached inducement Resolution which pertains to the Civic Center Associates application request. Resp tfull~ bmitted, JACK LAM, AICP Community Development Director JL:ns Attachments: Memorandum from Best, Best 6 Krieger Inducement Resolution Application • .3G LAW OFFICES O~ BEST, BEST 6 KRIEGER • M E M O RAN D U M T0: CHAIRMAN, AGENCY MEMBERS AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM: BOND COUNSEL DATE: JANUARY 2, 1985 RE: CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION FINANCING OF CIVIC CENTER ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL PROJECT Staff has received a proposal from Civic Center Associates (the "Developer") for the Agency's assistance in the tax-exempt financing of the acquisition and construction of an approximately 20,000 square foot office building (the "Project") proposed to be located on Civic Center Drive in • the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. The Developer has submitted an application and financial statements in connection with the Project, which have been reviewed. A tax-exempt financing mechanism that the Agency may make available to the Developer is an installment sale financing arrangement, including the issuance of certificates of participatio^.. Under this financing arrangement, the Agency would "acquire" the Project from a third-party seller pursuant to an installment sale agreement (the "First Installment Sale Agreement") and immediately "resell it" to the Developer pursuant to an identical second installment sale agreement (the "Second Installment Sale Agreement"). 37 LAW OLFICES OF BEST,BEST 6 KRIEGER January 2, 1985 • Page 2 Certificates of participation ("Certificates") would then be prepared and sold which would evidence proportionate interests in the obligation of the Agency to make installment payments under the First Installment Sale Agreement for the purpose of providing funds for the acquisition and construction of the Project. The obligation of the Agency to make such installment payments would be a limited obligation and would entail no financial liability on the pare of the Agency. The sole responsibility for repayment would rest with the Developer, who would have an identical obligation to make installment payments under the Second Installment Sale • Agreement. It is likely that this obligation of the Developer would be further secured by a letter of credit or other "security enhancement" device from a lending or credit institution for the purpose of enhancing the marketability of the Certificates. In the event the Agency is willing to consider making this financing mechanism available to the Developer, it is first necessary for the Agency to adopt a resolution indicating its intent to issue such Certificates or other similar tax-exempt obligations. This is a requirement of federal tax law relating to these types of tax-exempt obligations. This tax provision states that a developer • 3° LAW OF FiCES OF BES T,BEST 6 KRIEGER • January 2, 1985 Page 3 may only use tax-exempt monies for costs paid or incurred for a project after the date of the adoption of such a resolution of intention. Attached for your consideration is a proposed resolution of intention which satisfies this federal tax requirement. Adoption of this resolution does not obligate the Agency to proceed with the issuance of certificates of participation if, at some later time, it decides that it would be undesirable to do so. Rather, adoption of this resolution is only a preliminary step in connection with • the financing of the Project. Prior to the issuance of the Certificates, a number of other things must occur. First, the Developer will have to proceed to finalize a financing package with an underwriter and a credit institution. Second, it will be necessary to secure an allocation from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee for the Certificates. The Tax Reform Act of 1984 imposes a requiremen[ that the total dollar amount of all private activity bonds, such as the Certificates that are proposed to be issued, will not exceed limits imposed by that law. The City of Rancho Cucamonga presently is awaiting its allocation from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee for 1985. In the event this allocation is not sufficient to ?9 LAw alfiCES O~ BEST, BEST 4 KRIEGER January 2, 1985 Page 4 cover the financing of-the Project (and any other such projects proposed for tax-exempt financing in the Gity), it will be necessary to obtain an additional allocation, either from another local jurisdiction or from the State. John E. Brown Francis J. Baum • • 4~ Office Use On:v ' • Application :<o. -'~'0%- Date deceived ~,., ='+ Date Approved INDUSTRI A.L ^ECELCP'•+~'::T AU TI?ORI TY OF THE CITX OF 3A SC FiO CCCA1!O VGA P ROSECT EL.GIEILITY REVTE:: The information reGues ted on this form is necessary to process a recuest for fi na rc ial assistance frcm the Sndcs trial Development Autheri ty of the City of Rancho Cucamonca (the Authority). Fill in all the blanks usinc "NOP;E" oz "NOT APPLICABLE" where appropriate. If figures provided are estimates, indicate "EST" after figure. If more space is needed for any specific answer to a question, use a separate sheet. The inform- ation required may be waived at the discretion of the Secretary or assistant Secretary of the Authority. Return two (2) signed copies with attachments of this app licatior, to: Industrial Development Authority of the City of Rancho Cuca monoa c/o Co-TUnity DevelopmenC Department Post Office ©ox 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifcrnia 91730 I. IDE:vT IFICATION AND DESCRIPTION CF THE APPLICANT A. Company Identification 1. Official Company Name: Civic Center Associates Official Mailing Address: c/o Richard L. Spraker 620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 730, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (714) 640-1460 2. Business Orga ni ration: Corporation!, Partne rshin X Sole Proprietorship, or Othe r__ (describe) Is the Company owned by an individual a subsidiary affiliated directly or indirectly with any other organization? '~ Pace Z`,o If a corpora do r., list state of incerpoz~ti~n and date qualified to do business in Ca liforn i~ If a partrershi p, list name of par tr.e:ship Civic Center I~ fiB ^~acc=t, Associates and date of aczeement ='FGZCr p`d q i~-'pn~~,yyry If a subsidiary or affiliated with another co: pany give name and brie _` state- me r.t of offilia tion or re is ti onsh:p 3. Offi.-ers Name and Nome Address Other Business Aifi liati ons President Richard L. Spraker First Vice President k2 So. Vista de la Luna Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards So. Lacuna, G\ 92fi77 Vice President secretary Treasurer Controller Directors • cJ ~. Paye Three . 4. List nzme ar.d .`.eme address o: ecuicy c•.:ners c: 105 or more. if pac:ner-^ip, list cenera'_ and l.r..i ted pareners a..^.d interest awned 5y each. Sf trcst, list beneficiaries. Na a.e Richard L. Spraker t~ilLiam F. IIallhaus B of Equity Hcme Address Sntorast trsned ;2 So. vista de la Luna S~ l.a Snna ('1 97fi 77 S(7% 9601 FR lshire Dlvd, Suite 25 Aeverb~~ °ills• CA 90::'.0 50~ .., For n•a 5lic ly-held corporations, shew Stock exchance on which listed. If traced over the counter, or an ::ASDnQ, please list the market makers:.- . A. Company Description 1. Standard Zn dustrial Classification (STC) Code NO, of Company: 6511 Z. Description of principal products and/or services: Partnership created for the purchase of Civice Center Plaza. i 3. ~ List number and payroll, of current full and part-time 5y skill category. N/A employees, ~,a.r+r.n v:rrF Er~~`~~/J na~:coi_J~, ~ ? P 2c= Foltz Full-^_i ?, _ ?dyroll ~` - _ ?avrC11 - K:~Ol:nt _ ::2 n2ge^~ent S'ril led Semi-skilled _ Unskilled ,j~ 4. DesC:intion of company's physical facilities; N/A I',.•vl.~ r~ia -n •h...,a. cote -; n.r, :i _ r^ • 5. Financial statements (attach as exhibits) Three co o: each i f th • p es o e follcwi rg; A. For publicly held ccmpanies: Copies of the annual report to stocY.holdezs for each of the last three years; copies of any regis- tration statements, prospectuses and 10-R~ i w s filed th the Securities and Exchange Cec'n fi i ss on within each of the last three years; and c opes of the applicant's last 30-Q and m t os recent 8-R. B. For all other companies; a, Histozy and brief description of the appli- cant, any guarantor, and any subsidiaries includin t , g ype of products manufactured, present and future markets and prospects. b. Resume of management and ownership, including age, business ex perience, length of associa- tion with comps ry, salary and other compensa- tion, and directors with outside affiliations. c. Description of any pending litigation. • ~!`1 Pace Fiye . d. Copies c` auditad :fiscal yea:-end st3ter..e.^.ts for preced:,ng ttroe years. e. Interim fir.a ncial stater..ents fcr periods w i.t=in sixty days o_` the anplica tion. 6. Finzncial Projecti c.^.s Include a schedule sho•.:ina the cca~o a.^.y's debt recuire- me.^.ts and its a.~'.iii b: to service sane (cash flcw) for three years frc^. tna date of ~~che bond Issue. The schedule should be detailed by n,enths the f_..,t year and by cuarters for the two succaedi.^.a years. II. CC::TAC° IICFO:ZC4TICN A. Of _`icer tc whe-i all ^c ti. res and cer.^unication5 cor.cerninv the project s,`.ould be sent: taa me: Richard L. Spraker Address: 620 Newport Center Drive, Ste. 730, Necooert Beach, CF 92fiE Ce lephoae: (714) G40-1460 • B. Lecal counsel to app Li ca nt: Nar,.e: Jones, Dav, Reayis, a Poone, Attn: Robert H. Baker One Century Plaza, Sui Ce 3600 Address: 2029 Century Park East, Los Anpcles, CA 90067 Tc lephone: (2131 553-3934 C. Principal bank(s) with Hanes and phone nur..bers of contacts there. Name: *ar~na Bank Contact: John Watz 305 Forest Avenue Address: Laguna Beach, CA 92651 phone: (714) 494-9471 Name: Contact: Address: Phone; D. Independent accountant for applicant: Firm name• Sweeh, Hislop, s Connolly Contact: Leo M. Connally 1000 Quail St., Suate 00 Address: Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (714) 833-L10G ~/S Pzce Six • E. As a condition of the cro;ect acree-.ent tF.e a t.",o: ity nay recuest the indepe.^.dent Cert.:ied public accccntants of the aop licant to f•a:.-,i=_h a co-:ort !otter covering ti:e period from the last report date anti: the c'_esi..^.g of cbe bond transactio^. , As a further condition, t::e Au t'.;orit}• may also reeuest the Co-,pany's indeper.ce r.t certiEiec pcblic ac r_cuntants to annual l}•, in cc n;,ection with _. exam i,:z ti o^ o° financial statements, furnish a le toot of'cea~:iance with Se project aereeme^ts and with t'.:e ccr,._z^y's ~. enresent:a ions on in- creased emniovment. III. DESC?IP^.O:] CF ^.HE PRCJEC^. A. Project location an3 site ~.. _,.: ration 1. Address: Civic Centez Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 2. Si:.e of site: 1.4 Acres r/ 3. De=_criptien of cu:reat ir..p se•:ements on the site, • inc ludirg age, use and sine; include pictcres, if available: Not Improved e r,. ~T~'a nHl7r2rL".'r'C (, ;;;rg av ~~tr 9i ~. gl~lnnil!.i pa: 'r•L'7~~•Q, ''J-7 ^ll~i Ob=r:1r.Y;.J p%~, of Lr a,~~. it-^.'. r_:D ry,^d. GP. GG7 ~4; r11 Nit 2,:d ~ :!'ti-.: A. No 0'n-ter i rpTw i•M1. G^rl:[X '~P :.. _ :¢GU;^^P IOOn ),. Gym 7xrc 4. Estimated useful life of buildings andlor ecuipment: 5. Brief expla ra tion why Applicant is underta Y,ing project; To own and operate an office building in an expanding economic area. i u; Pace Seve.^. • D. P„•.n ershio 1, Does applicant c•wn sacs? ,yes R no. 2. If no, descr the lees<_ arr i,~ce ^.e nts, options o: other evidence of- --'_icanc's cerc;i ssion to use site, or 012..^.s tC dCCLL`reV si t,.. Aenlicant has an as reeaent %aith Forecast Develo::ment Ccroo ration to purchase said site. - 3. Please dttzch cop'_es o: an_d credit agreement, debt inde.'.ture or of"er instr.:csnts which in am• way 1ic,it npel_'cant's inde5ce d:,ess or a_`fect the sale, leasinc, ac q::aition o: use o' preoerty or npplicar.t's proposed operations at the project. N/,a 4. Na-e and address of 6roker(sl involved, if d_onlica5le: None • C. Prcpesed Prcject 1. Type of project (ne•.r faci'-i ,_:, excansion, re..^.ovation, o: aceuisitie r.) describe i^ de ail: ;Jew facility which will he a two-story, ?0,000 scuare foot, steel and _ glass, office hyildinc. 2. Estimate tine recuired for construction: Starting date 1/85 Completion date 6/85 3. Principal products, uses ar.d activities to be financed (include SIC Codel: Land, construction and financing costs ~'~2j (5'~!) D. Eligibility of project uses - A statement of eligibility of the project for financing under Section 91503 of the Act, Attach a letter from bond counsel attesting to the project's eligibility: ~~'7 Pace Ei g:^t i 2 ?roject is far industrial uses pa ranrath la)Iil o: Section 91503, conservation uses as described in Sectior. 91503. • as described in and; or for enercv paragraph (a)12) 0 A stateaent that the prc -~ecr is ^ot for the uses de- scribed under paragraph Ibj of Section 91503. 3. Ar:. cove..^.ants or bond ter-s restricting the use of the facilities or prcoer ::•, E. ?c blic Acorcvals/Permits ~~ Have all recuired pera.i ts, licenses and ocher public appro- vals, (E 1H, conditicnal use pernit, general plan cc-~o_liance, pcblic c:o rks, zoni r.a, local, state and federal reculat.cnel been obtained? K yes no, If r.o, please shcw status and expecte~ resolution cr rnco~p fete acti:•_tp. F G If yes, please describe: Final 6uildina of ans are currently Bond Counsel on proposed project: cirm nave: Jones, Day, Reavis, a Pogue Address: Une Century Plaza, Suite 3600, 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, Ca o Phone: (213 1553-3939 Please indicate the estimated capital expenditures during the last three years which were made in the political juris- diction (city or unincorporated county), of the proposed project for facilities used by the Applicant, or any other proposed occupant of the project 51,700,000 here ary of these expenditures financed by issuance of industrial development bonds? _yes X no. If yes, please describe: yF Pace Nir.e H. N.as the applic a:a use: !. ccstrial Finance projects a .'r.e re in^tte U.S. de•:elep-e,,t bends to ? 'ies ::o+; t4hat is the total a-.o•ant .,- all sac.`, bends issced or currently per.d inc'. S ::cr.e IV, CCSTS O? ^, FiE P20JECT State the costs necessary ``_or the accui siticn o: the sae and ecnstrnetion o° the procosec .,re =~ect tece tber ~..-h any aachine r;' and ecuic^,ent in cannec;den tbere~: a.., inc lndinc utilities, access reads, and appu rte ;pct Faci1.......,. ~. A. PRICE GF EXSS':::G T :;D A[:D 3UI~O ~:;GS 1. Land $ `-"~-~~~ 2. Buildinc S 3. Feas anci ot::er c.".a tees S related to this sale Total S 350,000 _ a. ccvsT?;vcTlo;r ccs°s 1. Architectural anc engineering 5 7~,ao~ Site pre?aration 2. $ ~~~'~'~= 3. Materiais S ~1~.oe~ -0. Labor S D~;C : :o 5, Pa vino and Landscaping $ in ,.,;~ 6. Utilhies co^nection S cc. ~, 7. Miscellaneous (itemize) S -~~- Total S 1,350,000 C. CS:iCHINERY ANO EQUIPMENT New 1. Invoice cost $ 2. Znstallation S 3. Miscellaneous (itemize) S Total S Used 1. Invoice cost $ 2. Installation S 3, Miscellaneous litemizel S Total S _ D. INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION (From ___TO__) S E. FINANCING, LEGAL. MISCELLANEOUS (PLEASE SPECIFYI S 100,000 F. CONTINGENCY (i£ appropriate.) ....... .........i..,..$ TOTAL PROJECT COST ......5 1L900,000 =% ? Pace :e $1 ?off aoo ::o te: ?reject gosts nay net _..c'_u5._ ~ - erper.ses; _..:~entor fir ~ "'_.•_ caccc~ -c :'inc refiaancinc^„- .a ac .r.c; cr a_-_- _.,. .eo ent, cr _ existi r.c i.^.cebta d:.essc ,, ,. cac strvcticn loans. ..__ ~..~.. V. C'_SC?Z?TION G? '" 2?C?GSE7 255:: =,':C° C? :CS Pv: lie; x Negotiated: 3, ?: cccsed ter-a of the bonds 30 ' : ear.,. C. Indicate ..e thcd of _°i-a :c inc: 1. Loa r. of bond proceeds by nuther_ty to d.p ~'icanc X 2. Lease o_° facilities by Au t!;ori to olicant 3. Insta llr..ent sale o` facilities `cy Au t:^cr.'y to ~~ Applicant Other 0. Ir.d ica to t're collateral far the bonds ar.d Che method of payment; identify revenues to he used for debt service: 'Letter of credit from a financial institution collateralized _aovernment banks. Revenue from rental income from building. E. Identify the proposed purchaser of the bo^ds, underwriter or placement agent for the Applicant: Name of purchaser: Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards Gfficer or partner: Alexis Jackson Address: 700 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Te lepho.ie: (213) 625-3545 Attach a copy of tentative commitment letter from such • prospective purchaser or tentative agreement with underwriter or placement agent. r j ?ace Eleven • F, will the b0.^.CS be 155L2G 1C 2>: C::a P.C2 :Or Ong OT mOr2 outstanding bonds, or si~a ar c h ins, or partly in such exchance and partly for cash or prcoerty? yes x ____ no If yes, describe, exc':ange or re reading, VI. DESC3I?^:TCS OF ?UBLTC 9ESE?I^S Be.^.efits which would accrue from undertaking the project, pursuant [o criteria contained in Section 91562.1 1== applicable, informa- tion in this section is to be ei•:en .for tot.`. the applicant and all other entities that will he pr?ncipal users o.` the facilit ies), A. Employment benefits 1. Ird icat_ .`u 11-Lice empioyment and payroll for var ieus categories: At Proiect Upon Comp l=Lion 1 Year After 2 5"e ars Af tez Site Todav o: Pro -~ect Ccr.,oletion Cr.~. p leticn S a 5 S s S !:anagement _ 20 51,600,000 40 3,600,000 40 9,000,000 • 5%i lied _ 13 260,000 26 572,000 26 625,000 Semi-skilled 7 84,000 14 190,000 14 200,000 Unskilled Total _._ 40 $1,944,000 80 4,362,000 80 4,825,000 2. If part-time workers will be emplo}•ed, attach descrip- tion as above. 3, Estimate, if applicable, increased emplo}~me nt and payroll in related and service fields due to the comple- tion of the project. S/ Paces Twelve • 4. Indicate, if zpplicab'_e, ar. ci c_na[ed _-ozc~ of t;:e p zcpcsed ::ew jcbs on croble^.s o: s_.c e uner,~io~:-.e.^.t o: the `:ardcore unemplcyed, 5. Document, if applicabie, that t;.e ccnple-ie^ o_` the prc;ect ••„•ill retair. jcbs that would ctbe rune be lost. R. Resource Co: ser;z lion (i-` applicable) 1. Explain zr.d docume r.t any es orated ccaserezti on o? er.er oy, mi-eral o: natural or~ cu L-ivated re_ources aris i:.g out c_ th= prcjec :. 2. Exo lain and do rament zny r ducticn cf waste, i-crever..enc oi~ :ecore r; o: in tensr`icat.cn o_' ~tilizaticn of re- sources that otherwise would be less inten site ly uti- lizes, wasted or not recovered. C. Cor.s umer tene_'its (if aeplicablel I. Exc:ain and docu-ent the imorovement of ct:a'_ity cr cuantity of products, energy• cr related se:aices by virtue of cempleti oa o_` t.`,e p:o7ect. D. Other Be..^.e `i is • 1. Y7i 11 project co r.trib•a to to t:~.c increver..e r,t of detri- mental en•/ircn-e r.tal factcrs? ~ yes r.o. I: yes, attach desc,-iption. 2. Will project contribute to the revitalization of a deteriorated area or will it increzse econoaic useful- ness of an area? ves no. If yes, attach description. 3. Estimate any increased local ar,d state taxes, fees and other revenues due to the ccmpletior, of the project. 4. Estimate any decreases o° public service costs by virtue of completion of the project (such as decreased welfare or unemployment costs). VII. A DESCRI PTTON OF ANY PU9LZC DETRI:'ENT ER 0;~1 ISSUANCE OF 30NDS Z;7 THE MAA I;1Utd A^10'uiJT PROPOSED IN TYE AP~LICAT'C'•. A. Employment displacement - will the completion of the project contribute to jab displacements (such as resulting from site clearance or demise of competing firms? _yes j( no. If yes, attach description. • n S ~- Pace Thirteen e. Energy, mineral or natural or c••lt'_vated -e =_c•~rce -pact will the completion of the project lead to :..creased cti lizaucn of scarce resources? ves If ves, attach L^., description. 1. Estimate of itczeased utiliratio.^. of reso•azces. 2. Estimato of increases in cost to the pub lit due to increased utilization. C. Does construction of the p: o;ect, ~or cpr.p le tion of the project have any adverse env iroamental ,Daces, ire ludir.q additional waste disposal? _ves _~r.o. Zf yes, attach description. 1. Estimate of environmental impacts. 2. Znc ludo copies of any required environmental impact reports. D. Ecenemic impact on the city, county ar.d/or state. 1. Estimate types and costs of new public services required by the project. • 2. Analysis of the costs to the city, county and/or state for public improvements inc'_ud.nc utility, street improvements, traffic con Lrol enha r.cem_nt, and the cost of fins r.c inq such improvements. VIII. A DESCRIPTION, IF APPLICAEL£, OF THE STATEtvID£ SIZ£ AND LOCATION A. ~A listing of the current statewide operations of the Appli- cant including size, location, number of employees and payroll. B. A listing of the statewide operations of the Applicant upon completion of the project, including size, location, number of employees and payroll. C. A listing of the statewide operations of the Applicant two years after completion of the project, including size, location, number of employees and payroll. D. Relocation - If financing is recuized for relocation of a facility within the State of California, documentation that the relocation is due to one of the following: n LJ 53 gage Fcurteen 1. An inadequacy of the exis ti nc facility. ~ • 2. A significant chance in the firm's operations that ;oould require a different lccation. 3. A building moratorium where the exis tine facility is located. - 4. The existing lease is expiring and cannot be renewed under economic coadi ti ons. 5. An economic need to move closer to the firm's cus tcmers or suppliers. - 6. Other. IH. ILIP ORTANT NOTICE TO APPLICANT Approval for financial assistance by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is determined by the information presented ir. this application. Any changes in the status of the proposed project from the facts presented herein and the exhibits attached could disqualify the project and cause it to 6e ineligible for financial assistance. In general, commencement of construction or any award of contract, including equipment, or • the execution of any contract for the final acquisition of the proposed project, prior to adoption of ar. inducement res olu[ion by the Authority where such construction or acquisition is to be financed by a tax-exempt issue, is likely to result in the application being ineligible for approval. The law requires that on any project which received preliminary approval from the Authority, after January 1, 1983, and which involves construction, improvements, reconstruction, or rehabili- tation to be financed in whole or in part by bonds issued pursuant to this program, all workers employed in such work, exclusive of maintenance work, shall be paid not less than the general prevail- ing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. Those rates shall be determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with the stan- dards set forth in Section 1773 of the Labor Code. The Director's determination shall be final, and Sections 1773.1, 1773.5, 1774 a rd 1776 (excepting subdivision (f) ) of the Labor Code shall apply. • `j t> Pace Fifteen • The Authority further recuires that the tor..?any coc_c:y with the reeuirements of section 2805 0: the California Labor Coce and the California Fair Employment 2nd housirq Act and the regulations promulcated thereunder and nay reeuire the company to develo? a program to insure compliance with regard to eaclo•: rent practices at the project, which procran shall he saris :actor:: tv the Authcrity. In connecticn with said program, the aop L'cant cvapany shall design, develop and impler..ent procedures, mai.^. rain ..°iles and collect data so as tc permit the independent certified public accountant of the acplicant to retort annually or. t::e applicant ~e crpany's compl?ante with said procram. X. CERTIFICATION It is hereby represented and certified by the undersi c:.ed that to the best knowlecce and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein and attached hereto is accurate ant ccrrect and truly descriptive of the project, the applicant ant any guarantor or other proposed project user. i ~ • Title: l..usc. %.-=~i~•~- DATED: /L ~ ~i 'J'% U ,y- s • RESOLUTION N0. QA T.~ "~ y A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INDICATING ITS INTENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF OBLIGATIONS AND THE INSTALLMENT SALE FINANCING OF A COMMERCIAL PROJECT BY CIVIC CENTER ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Agency") is authorized pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, being Section 33000 and following of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act") (i) to purchase property, both real and personal, and any interest therein for purposes of redevelopment in a redevelopment project area; (ii) to sell or otherwise dispose • of any property, both real and personal, and any interest therein for purposes of redevelopment in a redevelopment project area; and (iii) to make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercise of its powers; and WHEREAS, Civic Center Associates, a California partnership (the "Developer"), has requested assistance in the financing of the acquisition and construction of an approximately 20,000 square foot office building proposed to be located on 1.4 acres on Civic Center Drive (the "Project"), all located in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area of the Agency (the "Project Area"); and • (i WHEREAS, said financing is proposed to be provided by means of the Agency entering into an installment sale arrangement with respect to the Project, including the issuance of certificates of participation or by means of the Agency otherwise issuing tax-exempt obligations (said certificates or obligations being collectively referred to as the "Obligations"); WHEREAS, the Agency, in order to encourage economic development and employment opportunities within the Project Area and as an aid and inducement to the Developer, is willing to authorize the issuance of the Obligations in an amount sufficient to provide financing for the Project subject to the restrictions of the Act and all applicable California • and federal laws as they presently exist, provided Chat the Project receives all necessary local governmental approvals of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1. Findings. This Board hereby determines that the undertaking of the financing of the Project by the Agency will be a substantial factor in the accrual of public benefits to be received from the Project, should the Project be approved and constructed, and that the proposed financing is in accord with the purposes and requirements of the Act. -2- C1 57 • Section 2. Issuance of Obligations. Subject to the completion of the proceedings and other matters relating thereto to the full satisfaction of this Board, and subject to Che Project receiving all necessary Local governmental approvals, this Board hereby agrees to provide financing to the Developer or such other person or entity approved by the Agency for the Project through the issuance of Obligations as described in this resolution in an amount not to exceed $1,900,000. Section 3. Nature of 061iAations. The Obligations Co be issued shall be special obligations of the Agency payable solely from installment payments or other revenues to be received by the Agency pursuant to all agreements • (including any installment sale agreement with the Developer) in connection with the financing of the Project, a].i ii: a form acceptable to the Agency, and shall not be a general obligation of the Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof. Section 4. Official Action. It is intended ehac this Resolution shall constitute "some other similar official action" toward the issuance of indebtedness within the meaning of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. • -3- Sq Section 5. Other Approvals. The adoption of this • Resolution shall not bind the Agency to issue certificates of participation, bonds or other obligations until and unless all other necessary actions and approvals are taken or received in accordance with all applicable laws. The adoption of this Resolution does not and shall not limit in any manner whatever the Agency's and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's full discretion to deny any further permit or approval that may be necessary for ultimate completion of the proposed Project. In this connection: (a) All contracts relating to the acquisition, construction, installation and equipping of the Project shall be solicited, negotiated, awarded and executed • by the Developer, for its own account, subject to applicable federal, state and local laws. (b) The Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall have no pecuniary liability to [he Developer for eny fees in connection with the Project. (c) The Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall recover any and all costs to the Agency or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as applicable, which are incurred in furtherance of or attributable to the issuance of the Obligations. If the Obligations are not issued, all such costs shall be paid by the Developer. -4- • 59 • Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. ADOPTED this.- day of January, 1985. ATTEST: C airman o t e Re eve opment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California SecreCary o t e Re eve opmen[ Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California • • -5- Go I, LAUREN M. [dASSER;tAN, Secretary of the Redevelopment • Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the Aedeve lopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of January, 1985, by the following vote of the Agency AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: IN WITNESS [JREREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and • affixed the official seal of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California this day of January, 1985. ecretary o t e Re eve opment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California -6- u G~ iJ J.]J ~ ~JU ]• r .~ _ )N u ^ • • n v Jr .~ i .• .. ~.~ ~• ... J u _ S U l ~.. uPmPJ u V W ~.U.r J•lu ^I J ~ .i .. rr _ JyJ 1.,,. J.~i~ ~. ..rUUJ.. JUJJJr J .~.r • J i - .. . N ~ ..1 .] ~J ! - J 1 ~ -+ V : , • V ^ ~ n U ~ l J t] Y+ u> ~ O J « i VL~•1 .1 ~ ~ n6CJ ti ~ > 1 6~~. ]. ^ A J iu~.l Ui+ i .JU>f Clr- n ] i V yJ~ LI ~JL~L tIWh ySLJU- _ - ~ at ZLU u2~ ~n]J}J ~~LL ~7u ~ J ~ J ri L u Y (l v V V ~ f >. S i.) > 2 I S] ti J L rt> V L i u6a J < V / i A i w G i J . L ..z .JJ 'nom um lei.. ^ t - ~< a.G n iLDU41 Q+ Sw3 •UUU^ ~ ~ L ~C 1JL i C.AU _ LL J uJ..l YJLu Nit LLmU S].2 ni Wn uU¢ wl<VYiM SCnW Ww tV 7 { FW LL _ m O V O LL ? < fu WV lJ ~.J~ uJZI w nF Wn WLLJ 1N.u OF LurYZ [ . r 'U 6 •2ww~ r F ~ C L ipY yOyp ]] (( J ~ < N<~ R ~ W F i6 ~r LL' w fYF U m~ 3~~tN Z 2 f2 O ul F ~ i y{SJW wrn S~ UL~.L L6'¢M <W l«<p i',W ~ t 1 V m (Y Y V Y 2nOVJJJ ~m N rJC V•'rF mryi « V<l<tOmmLOC UIIJVV mgrvr O ryI4:O OO~•1Np ~ VYVV MO ~W 1 1 » ¢ ~ O p II` YmppF P'. nFry•+~wY^mm'~IOIG]WU IY~~p I r 1P W rn p WL~f wp ~ F m~_F ^^^111IIImVd WIV F •~ { ~ I1 I / I ~J~+JJ~ nJNV~u J~t~'riu [ ,r .. ... ~.., ~~. -, .. .. .u rv 't. a a. a .:., n r + J L ] i _ _ ~Z` J -l J']1r~ Y ut l e m .~ i J~ uL l.6- LtLa ~) t tl inL~ L r . L .. <~ JUG JJ nfuJ ~Z.. /J,n "J a, nUn i NVrn r~ f uV.r r1iLl ~S V ~t .-2.+ •Ce-t ILA uLSU_ rG L [ ~+ u. J u ± J' ~J ~+~+ V r ~] i L ] " Cl G 1 LG 7U •L JUST Y ^i l nC+Y~[RK~34 .lrY CJ1V in J'JTr i~+{ S J^rL r)u w7V~Lr Y .tUYJ ~ rt V J_V^Jilfl IwWL+J ^ ^ iW Jt S LL rr t'lYY r u ~ V.t~rr wY ~2~11 J.t 41t~)r ul LLOyt{ W U n r c +: LLJ.~ ~ JrL JJ J ~ J{L •< f V) YN t~.u .n ~ ...3 .. <~ .. 2 . s d,,._... ,: J ~ {inC LL~[~.f l{^r uF lu uVt<JI(JN^^n WYw 6YL] S Vw Ww2f' •Iy rnJ pNf Y ~p Vfw^l1VV.))u 9~n6wrJV UrLiY4ti<w^{t J1J VOLC]LLL ZZ ItiJfJ JJ J<w <L• T,OVWW20LLRr[ O <U f{ wl O UUV Ur)JV VUUJ<w WW Wr4Ww VVtV UVV~ SZ IryY JYJJ um JmrPr~Y1M1P^lml~m wrV HY VM WNmV) r+1~ Wrvr. w'~fnrlrmmrm OPO UFw IW Wtiur~„wry^^ V'mrV ~f Frl/PNUWWiWiV'rp~YrJmM1 ^ W ~ M1WF m A FWIV rnM1 rn mJJ'Vr n.r~M1 l~{IM1r YOTn T • L :i i 0 L) • , L~ J 1 r O W ~ ri M tl ^ PI ry V.+nr JJ+u ru n.n Jn JUNn^J WOUVO~+ n.T^W +u. J`Y..~r .rv ~ ~~ NWO~ N .~ T N N J n V .~ -• .^..r+' Y L W ~ r _ .1 •••• Kx.W [ . 1 r. L ..i u~~ - . w~J u ..I ~.1 iJ W.J ~.I ~~ CL n ~ ~ ` a < ` LC L< ~1 -r LN L w a> j C J V 1 W 111 1 - L LL i LnV NV¢nl1JJi ~JN.naV iin.u Jan ~, ..,L rws. tea- wKN J2... WVN r•4r JGi^ Z^ CC~jw Z LJ4 ^~J+La + aL. ~:[ .pn WUl OJLLYPUZ rWr.u~ ulr ~J7 Jim fJ ~iKLr ul.n c^+u+. .L .,, u i~ i. eil •~+1+tJ na.LU~~ ^J'~ ~ ,~ ]tJ .r r V •L V< ~yV1 L, L± uV J~ 1 L =i xv< z ~iw µu~JOi`i ~ ~t - ..c.J .,w _ Ls ~~ C'12 >NU U ~1S L>'nnr L 2444f J~ i) 2J Of W64 rU4 CS6~L~ ,r.~.aa .. .~<.t •. ,.ui.• opJWP u sac. iuw a>z.. .x ^ e ulwJU JC~uJ~L OS JC r2U ^JJS [l rJ irr~Li^^r ui]2,)r'J'J1r Jw rj~~rLUrY LL LItNM 1QOLU i-1 •. M1f WVN^OS-, {f1.({f J.] ~LLYU~uo N~OUn W~+.JN42¢ 2¢ 23V000U', ~n0 •Z r i lJ ••S~Jw OyVrr SV^.uNW ~wrnfOWp ¢L ^N iwJW ;L iu w ( Jr i U6J1C6 NS 1L l.J •+Wfr•~ W W ~~'nCNM ~Zr r6r ~~ JCK wJ r'V+LL C] i 3V VtNr^ W~ V<1 Z¢~n ru.l OT^uuW yJ2¢W R¢¢rON }i J JUSW > Ony2 rit rr f J NWWWW ~ CM }r>P<YCS L'L1l6Yw tU^2[uy Ji UyLiWr>Y'SIWj LL•~ 04WiRWY ff OMW W1..,«JO ff pftW WWpO p6P ~}9W~ap LZL~U9I~Wjj2 LP WLLKSU<iiiC.Q¢NNNmYNN,NNNNNNN'•rr hPfIrP NONwW+n'W NYt n1NU~ON Y1'1WN^OY)•un'hF PM)u SFN V•OW y NM17P to M1.OP AAVIWM1NI~n V„SIM YnIN~~T YTM1~~^.T nI T'~1Y~N iD V 3 L~ <1 41 iI JI t L p N ~ W eY t *1 L ~: v.J. ,. ~ c, .. J ~ r .. n i. + _ r. y .~ Yu'.v ~r.S' .. w r ~ y w ~O ~/ .~ J [: 1~ ~ ,~ G + u!^ 1 fL J o 2L wi ~ NU <~ Sr-~-IC ~IJ •JL ".i'¢<~ z n~~~ u ll 'I P t ~[u 1 ...t J t C L Y J _ ~.s •7a ~+6J L ri JWV~U `Z4Vn n YL~- ^'IJ1 u []nJ TS JYU JJIV~L Q t r~ q ~ni~ ~a.~ ~J, ~. i._JU~~ii.`i~ L Y = tC .. ~2 ti ]LL C ~+ Q J J ^ t'y J~L~J~ JS<+~ <JJ! i~C ~~n[~~J lwU w~J IIJZ~'I lJ6 <.L JW<Z 'mu JAL ~JI..~.w 6:N<6RNN 2JLWJ )J L<fsi:L LiigrNa ~WIY OrrIN r~NN OJJJ 6NY~ri~~Tn Ornu L~ u, s j ] w L ai n_YJYf,+ -LnUj)V' <J^JWWWv .~J>.nJ n J 6 [.J w <~ J C V L<uwp«~~ ~~ w r~:]V JCLw~J Zn w )< V J<wvltLp MO~wT 019rWOt W< ~YWNnMJMnmV<Jn' lWnninOJn~iVLJ pJi< <it2<VN{ ppnY~iwVOZN<7u ~IpN PO iLVU nlrl iLlOTP W~rwNNOin~ywNw ~Y Y.+ WJ_ • • ~. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager ~s" FROM: Lloyd B. Hubhs, City Enginee SUBJECT: Release of Bonds Tract 12090 - located on the East side of Archibald, North of Feron DEVELOPER: USA Properties 1801 Wilshire Bivd., Suite A Santa Monica, CA 90403 Release: Labor and Materials Bond 524,750.00 • Six months have passed since the release of the Faithful Performance Bond and no claims have been filed. Therefore, it is recommended the Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 524,750.00. Tract 11013 - located on the East side of Amethyst, South of Banyan DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P. 0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Maintenance Bond 517,340.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond $173,400.00 The road improvements for Tract 11013 have been completed in accordance with the approved plans. It is recommended that Council accept the road improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept the one year maintenance bond in the amount of 517,340.00, and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5113,400.00. continued... S City Council Staff Report Re: Release of Bonds January 16, 1985 Page 2 Tract 12332-1 - located~on the East side of Haven Avenue at the North City Limits DEVELOPER: W. H. Laband 3311 E. Cameron West Covina, CA 91791 Release: Improvement Security 560,000 On November 7, 1984, Council authorized the reduction of the Security for Tract 12332-1. The road improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended that Council authorize the release of 560,OOG, holding the remaining 5300,000 to guarantee Labor and Materials, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. • Tract 11663 - located on the East side of grch ibald South of Church Street DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development • 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1550 Los Angeles, CA 90667 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 528,000 The road improvements for Tract 11663 have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended that Council accept the improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance bond in the amount of 528,000. Tract 12019 - located on the East side of Archibald South of Church Street DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1550 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 531,500.00 The road improvements for Tract 12015 have been completed in accordance • with the approved plans and it is recommended that Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to ffle a Notice of Completion, and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 531,500.00. ~o ~~_ aond:T100f 15 Premi um:Included • MAINTEMN[E FIIARANfEE BONG NHERLAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State o/ Lal iforni a, and ceeis e m (hereinafV_r designated' as "Print pa eve entered ,nto an a9reemen[ whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain desigwted public improvements, which said agreement, dated eebrua.-~ 6 19 ea and identified as project rvcc uo!! oca tree ear: on e r >mech~at a is hereby re erred Low-made apart herea ana NNEREAS, said principal is required under the Cerms pf said agreement to furnish a band for the faithful per/ormance of said agreement, Section 16, ,u ar an teeing atl improvements free of all defects for a period of (i) one year after acceptance of mart !1q1 by the City. NOM, THEREFORE, we the pri nc iv al antl oeve to e as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the ru tys of `ancho c^. amonga (hereinafter coiled "City"), in the penal sum Of seventeen c~neusa.,L cicsu_CU~d etl for tl Dollars (f n,p:p) IaMul money of the United States, or thef payment of wn icp sum we it and truly [D be made, we bind ourselves, cur heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the ahove banded principal, his Or its heirs, exe[u[prs, dGdi ni SLrdtprz, successors pr assigns, shall in all thf ngs stand to and abitle by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereat made as therein specified, and in all respeas according tq their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and empl0yee5, a5 Lhefein sti DDl aL ed, Lhen this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. • As a part of Che obligation secured ha ~eby and in additi cn Lo the face amount specif lee therofor, Lhere shall be included costs and re asonab to exoenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred oy City in succe ssfvily enforcing such obligatidr, all to be taxed as costs and mcl vtled in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees [h a[ ne change, ertensi pn of Sime, altera[i on or addition to the terms pf the agreements ortto the work [o be performed [hereunder or the specifications accompanying Ne same shall In anywise effect its obligations on this band, and it lees he•ehy wet ve notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to [he terms of the agreement ar fo the work or to the specifications. IN NITNESS NNEREOf, phis instrument has been duly erecp fed by the pri ncipai and surety ahove named on olevwer :_ 19 na DEYELOPEP SURETY I<vvs Homes of allfo mia vet-ce ee t-sura~ ~ ~ nameCe 1 r 1 aY: I 1' \ ~~ 3l3 N:izh::e d':.. .y-. ^. RUTH' I FO A A/d6res I - SrE PN EN A. SPAOVOLO/ r PLEASE AITAQI PONER OF ~1T00.NET TO ALL a0110S S[fiNATURES MIST eE IgTAR12ED ~_ ^ ~\ 0.ELOROING PEQUE57E0 BY CITY OF 0.ANCH0 CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box B07 0.ancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NHEN RECORDED MAiL i0: CITY CLERK CITY OF gANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Bax 807 Rancho Cucamonga. California 91770 NOi ICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT 1.IDe undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract No. 11017 2.The full name and address of the under sf gned owner is: CITY OF RANtIq NLNgNGA, 9320-L Base L1ne Road, P. D. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3.On the 16th day of January, 1985, there was completed pn the hereinafter descri hed real property the work of improvement set forth in the• contract dotumants for: Tract Bo. 11017 4.The name pf Me original contractor .or the work of illgfpvHM:nt a3 a wh012 was: LeMls Hame$ 5. The real prpperty referred to herein is situated in the City of 0.ancno Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, tat ifornia, and is des crihed as follows: Tract No. 11013 TNe Street address of said property i5 N/R CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner a e py a s, y ng neer • ~~ s RE[o0.O18G REOD ESTED BY CITY Cf RANCHO COCAMONGA P. 0. Boc D07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130 NNEN 0.EC00.0ED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK C[TY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA P. o. eo, eo1 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE iS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1.IDe undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real DroDerty, th¢ nature of which interest Or estate is: Tract No. 11663 2.ihe full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO COCPMONGA, 9320-C Base Line Roatl, P. 0. Roo 807, P,ancho Cucamonga, California 91730. • 3.On the I6th day of January, 1995, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents Ior: Tract No. 11663 4.The name of the original contrec for for the work of improvement as a whole was: Mar iborough Development 6.ihe real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Lucamonga, County o1 San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Tract No. 11663 The street addre 55 Of Said Draperty is N/A CITY OF RANCHO CO[PMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner a e oY u s, ~ Y ng near 9 RECORDING REOUESTEO BY CITY OF RANCHO LULAMONGA P. 0. Boa 801 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NHEN RELOADED MAIL i0: CITY CLERk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Boa B07 Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornfa 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAI: 1. The untlersigne0 is an owner of an Interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature at which in[ere st or estate t5: tract 12019 2.The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO N[AMONGA, 9720-C Base Line Raatl, P. 0. Boa 807, poncho Cucamonga, Ca 7lforn is 917)0. 3.On fhe 16M day of January, I9R9, tnere was completed on the hereinafter described real property the Nork of improvement set for t6 in [he contract aacuments for: tract !2019 4.The name of the original contractor for the Nork of impfDVlmeOt as d whole wa$: Marlborough OevetoDmen[ 9.The real property referred to herein is $ltu ated in the LI[y of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is de$cr shed as f011DN$; irac[ J2019 fie street address of said property is N/A CITY OF RgNLNO LUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, ONner ate L oy Hu s, ty ng sneer • /~ RECORDING REpU ESTEO eY CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGA P. 0. Baa 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NNEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK L ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMANGA P. 0. Box 00] Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF LONPLETSOH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: L The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, Me nature of which interest or estate is: Trace No. 12)72-1 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCPNONGA, 9720-[ Base Line Aoad, R, 0. Boa 007, Rancho [ucawnga, Cali/ornta 91730. • 3.On the 16tH day of January, 1985, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property toe work of tmprovemen[ set forth in [he WIILfdCL dOCYI1MO t5 fnf: Tract '10. 12732-I 4. the name of the original contractor for the work of imprOVement ds a wh01e was: N. N. Labantl S. The real property referred to herein fa si tooted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernartl ina, Ca!iforn ia, and is de striped as follows: Tract No. 12332-1 The street address o/ said property is N/A CITY Of RANCHO LUCANONGq, a mun ictpal corporation, Owner a-~-" oy a s, 1 y ngineer 1% . G r+ RESOLUTION N0. EBt='33='Oilt 8'a ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RCCEPTING THE PUOLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 11013, 12332-1, 11663 AND 12019 AND AUTHORIZSNG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION fOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract Nos. 11013, 12332-1, 11663 and 12019 have been Completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to 6e filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, he it reso lvetl, that the work fs hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED ih is 16th day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: on ,Mike s, ayor ATTEST: Heuer y A. Authe e*., tty erk jaa ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: January 16, 1985 TG: City Council and City Manager FRGM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer ~GVG NOYCI s' ! ' > ;~ ~~p ~' ~ !!z 1971 I SUBJECT: Acceptance of Hellman Avenue Improvements from 6th Street to 656 feet Narth \J The Hellman Avenue Improvement Project, from 6th Street to 656 feet North, has been completed to the 5atisf action of the City Engineer. It is recommended that Council approve the acceptance of the project and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder. It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Hellman Avenue Street Improvements from 6th Sir~zet to 656 feet North and pass the attached resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion. RECOMMENDA1i0N: Respec tfuily submitteQ, ,._,. ''7,l~ u~~ ~ lBH:MP c Attachments /3 RECOAOIN& flEOUESTEO BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGp P. 0. Boz 307 Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornfa 91730 MHEN AELOROEO MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA P. 0. Box 007 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1, The undersigned ii an owner of an interest or estate in fhe here inaf[er described real property, the nature of which Interest or estate 15: Hellman Avenue from fith Scree[ to 656 feet north of 6th 2, the full name and address of the antlers igned prmer is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONG4, 9320-L Base line Road, P. 0. Box 007, Rancho Cucamonga, • California 91730. 3. On the 16th day of January, 1905, Mere was comp) e[ed on the hereinafter described real property Me work of improvement set forth in the contract do<umen is for: Hellman Avenue from fith S[rept to fi56 feet narM of fiM 4, The name o1 the original contractor far the work of improvement a5 a whole was: Great Venture 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in Me City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is de striped az follows: Hellman gvenue from fith Street Lo 656 feet nprtry of 6th The street address pi said Draper [y is N/A CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGp, a municipal corporatl on, Owner L oy u s, Ity ngineer I U ~y RESOLUTION N0.~B3-3fi=fl2R 8S'-OS • A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HELLMAN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS FROM 6TH STREET TO 656 FEET NORTH OF 6TH AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of puhlic improvements for Hellman Avenue from 6th Street to 65fi feet north of 6th have peen completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 1965. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: on ~ ike s, , ayor ATTEST: Bever y R. Authe et, ,ty er jaa /S u EJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIOIv`GA STAFF REPORT C~!CAMp ~9 n ~-' " ~ a' ~ z Z 19;; ~ SUBJECT: ADProval of Subordination Agreement for Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8011 located on the south side of Bella Vista between Carnelian and Sapphire submitted by John Olsen Jr. DATE: January 16, 1985 TO; City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer gy; Barbara Krall, Engineer Technician for ~P arcel Map 8011 wasa approvedhbyfCityeCouncil uon February 23 t1984rovements In order to secure financing for their project, the lender requires that the Olsen Ahasemsubmib tedubthe ~ attached aSUbordinationo Agreement lfore CityMCounch 1 approval. Res ectfully submitted, %/ / L ~. ~ . v. Atta hments RECOIMENOATION IL is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Subordination Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. /!o • Bubo ragmt Su9GRDINATIGn AGft EEMENT vOT :.°: iH[S SU90R 01'VAT fON AGAE EwENi RE 5'J LTS :N YO'dR SECOAiiY 1'rt ERE ST IN THE DRO;ERTV 3ELCA.:'IG SdBOECT 70 ANO LO6'ER P;IORITY TxA'I TeE ',:EN OF SOME OTH E; OR LATER SEC'ORiTY L4 SiR'J'^ENT. ixiE .:• r lr •lT mare this ZE t.: day p` Or crFa ,1gbJ Or %tW~~~~CIS N, .R. ~ owner pfn :n~ .ann nerann her?1narTr nescrTo =_d ono nerelnar ter rerer•_a tc as "Owner" anC :ne =i:y of Rapcno Lucanonga herein of :er refer. ed to as "C'. ty", owner ono hpl tler o/ the certain Rea PrOOerty and Lien Agr=¢^en[ her_inaft er referred to as '.ien Agr¢em ent", N[TNE SSETN Caz.~ a$ Rr :dilp Cuc.una:ea W Us ie~'.e:aus;., '..~w...~,,.i ca :iatn THAT NNER EAG, si nmpnh._~ ^cctLC: :..:d i<u: aguac,a dated Fci hl:v IS IRa~ Cpven np; v ::cu Nu. T v, P^:c u: LL:y ac. fail, uctEcd u: uu ct 91 "i Fa:c c< ^'~.:pa, n:.ja d2-5i, :eccrLS eo a,ud u:uaH. Rest D:a pa aJ Imptovemrni d Lab: Ag ie onyt to secure !h!„u~,dt.u:d ar~.tlm: •t [s ate ~.rm t•..UU'r.'. which was retarded F¢e9e.:~ - '9bJ ~.i.a i. -":n ;h~flc ;al Recd rds pf said County; and • AH ER EAS, owner has edecu!?d a deed of ;rust and hate in the sum of La ~.m:d :e: aa':~:61 sax La'u a,n:d a.;d nea cG....-.-.~-...----..-.~... dates - .,, In favor df • S.va.: ~ c :as c :;a[ 4a,ca.rtac.: ne r0•n 2°[¢r re ~e rred ~:o as "Lender", paydC,a 'x 1[n lnteres[ and upon the tens and conditions described th¢r¢'. n, which deed of trust 15 [P be re carded concurr en;ly herewi :n; me HN EREAS, i[ is a contli Lion pr~:etlent to ma'e ing said loan that Shcd dEed Of LrVSL 1d5t dbOVC nen[iCned Shdll 'JnCOndltOn dl iy he and remain at all [i m¢s a lien dr charge upon the land he reinbef or? described, on ar sod superior [o the glen pr charge of the Lien Agreement; and NNEREAS, Lender is willing to na'xe said loan pr pvi0ed th¢ d?ed of Cru4t s¢CVYIpg th¢ SdmC IS d lien pr Cnar3f upon Lne ab p'/¢ OC SCrIb¢d pr opCrty prior io SpOorjpr [p [nP lien pr Ch Brae Of [n^_ Lien Agreement and provided [n at Ci :y wail ipectfically dnd unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement to the lien or charge pl [he deed pf trust in favor pf Lender; and HHEgEAS, ii is the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender modify sold loan [o Owner; and City is willing [hat the deed of trust securing the same shall constitute a lien or charge upon said land w'n i:h is a^contli :ion?l ly prior to suoeripr Co the lien or charge on [he Lien Agreement. NCH, THEREFORE, in consider a[ion of the mutual benefits ac curing to the parties hereto and other valuaEle consideration, the receipt and gulf icienCy of which COnSlderd[ion fs h¢reey acknowledged, dnd in order to induce Le nd¢r to modify the lp an abo le r f?rred [o, it is herby deci are tl, and ea st pod and ag r¢¢d d5 f011 p'xS: ~tl Thdt Shcd deed pf LfVSt 52CVr10g Sa1d np G2 1n favor of lender and any renenals or eaY ensigns thereof, shall uncondltion ally be dnd remasn at all times a lien or charge pn LFe proDo rty therein d¢scribed Dri or and superior to the lien ar charge of [he Lien Agreement. ~~~ ~ / 7 (R) That Lentler wpuld not make its loan above described wi [bout this subordination agr¢en¢n c. (]) chat this agreement shall Oe the wh Ole and Lnly agreement with regard to the subordn d[ian of [ne lien or charge of the Lien Agre¢men[ to :he Iaen or charg¢ pf Che deed of :rv sl in favor pf ; above re i¢rred to and sh a17 supersede and cance~, but only insofar as would off ¢<t :he pnpn [y betweep [he deed of [rvs: antl Lien Agre¢men[ any prior agreements as to such subprdi nation inc !utltng, put not linit_d to, those prpviEipnE, if any, con taf ned in the Lien Ag re?^a r, wn+ch provide for the su bprdinaCipn pf tAe !i¢n or charge the reo/ [L a.^.o:h¢r deee or deeds of truss or to another mortgag¢ pr mortga9 =_s. The City declares, agrees and ac'a nowledges that:. (a) Ne wns¢ntz to and approves a7I provisions pf ;he note and deee of trust in favor of Len de^ above referred to by that certain mpdif icatipn ogre e^~ent by and be[we en Owner and Lenae', da Ld (b) Ne infen:i ovally and unc ondi [ionally waives, relingui sne s' and su bardina[es the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement in (aver of Che Lien or Charge upon said land of the deed Of trust in favor p1 Lender adpve ref erretl to and unde~st ands YhaC in reliance upon, and in considerar+nn of Ch is waiver, reline u+snmen[ and subprdinat+pn • speciftt loans and advances aro petng and n 11 b¢ mado one as a part and parcel tnerepf, spec+nc monetary and pth¢r oSI'gdtipn5 dre Ce+ng and will be entered into which ~ovld not be made or entered info but for said relia~.ce upon this waiver, r¢11npYi5hFl P. nt dnd SU d)'dl pdtlpn~ dnd (C) 4n Cndof Se!nent hdi h¢en pI3C¢d VpOn Lhe L+En Agreene nt Chat said Lien d9reement nos by Chis instrument been subprdina L=d [o the lien or charge Of Che deee ¢f trust in favor of Lesd?r abvve referred :o. NOTICE: THIS SU BOP-0INATiOY AGR EE'4 r.'IT CO'Ii AI'!S A P40VI5I0:+ AHILM ALL ONS THE PE?S 0'1 09'. IGdT EO ON YOUA REAL PROPERTY SE C'JR TTY ip 09TAIN A LOAN, A POATI9V OF xX I~H HAY. BE E%?E'10 EO FOR ?U9POSE5 OTHER TH A.V IMPR O'JEMEVT OF THE LAt10. ' ~ sa~co nns Ixsexmce SLaE OF C.4fORNia 55 ' n ~ _ aq d vt.~.~ On i0u 0a ^ ~ •S q _~' V ~9 , •l afYe ~e'ne uMeraQrni a No+ary fludK~ aM ra }W fdcM1 ap SUV PortPauv a4MarM .I LY'J: a_ i .~i~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ S Mi L 4 _, ~_, _ _ , TOR HOFIRY SFAI Ofl T. - Rrsa•'nM1 u,awn Y ro~roa wmw mF+wr in. e.a. dui•.i+om r.«roio o. m. s nn.m.-.rMai na,n• ~..awxrcee ie ine any. msrruwd M4 MmwMagYJ lnal f.L w.MVIN IM ianw vf;:^~ OFFICIAL SEnL • 1~' ",' ~ rI O tAF IE niI^R~IA QI: .~ , , 1 ' ~.% yr o~rar.Omns [Dunn egVWxMNaxry i __ /g f ~~ ~ ~~ RESOLOTION N0. •E8i~26=991C SS' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM JOHN OLSEN JR AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of curb, gutter, asphalt paving and appurtenant work along Bella Vista Drive was approved by City Council on February 17, 1984 and recorded in San Bernardino County on February 23, 1984, Instrument No. 84- 042171 and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above-mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of t•ie City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be a d the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized ti sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamon ~a, and the City Clerk attest thereto. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike ls, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y Authe et, ity er ,jaa i9 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 6. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer (~~o GuGMO Lr ~yC) i ,~ F I ^~ , 1971 SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement for design of a traffic signal at Base Line Road and Turner Avenue to be coordinated with reconstruction and widening of Base Line Road, south side, from Teak Way to Haven Avenue. Design cost for signal will be 52,000.00 The widening and reconstruction of Baseline Road near Hermosa, contained in the City's 1984-85 Capital Improvement budget, will require a traffic signal at that intersection. The signal design will be accomplished 6y a consultant who specializes in that type of work, under the attached agreement for a cost of 52,000.00. RECOM'ENDATION It is recommended that the attached agreement be approved and executed for the City by the Mayor and authorizing funding from Gas Tax and Systems Development Funds~as budgeted. ~'~~Kr " ully su i ted, LB H: .ko Attachments ?G • AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT BASE LINE ROAD AND TURNER/HERMOSA AVENUE THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 1985 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipa Corpora Lion, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Lawrence S. Eisenhart, Consulting Engineer, with the place of business at 22400 Barton Road, Suite 200, Grand Terrace, California, 92324, hereinafter referred to as "Engineer". W ITN ESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, City has need for engineering services, consisting of the preparation of improvement plans, specifications, and estimates for the traffic signal to be constructed at the intersection of Base Line Road and Turner/Hermosa Avenue, hereinafter referred to as "Project". WHEREAS, it is beneficial to City to have under contract an engineering firm which can immediately perform required services for City fora predetermined lump sum fee; and, • WHEREAS, Engineer desires to perform engineering services for City under contract. NOW, THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed as follows: I. Engineer, when authorf zed, shall perform professional civil engineering services in conjunction with the aforementioned project as follows: TASK A. Orientation Meetino with Cit 1) Review of project scope. 2) Obtain from City: a) Pertinent design criteria for traffic signal design; b) Available street improvement plans, topography, utility information and plan sheets. TASK B. Complete the Improvement Plans far the pro Lett I) Preparation of a traffic signal plan utilizing the City supplied title and detail sheet and technical specifications utilizing the 1984 edition of the Caltrans Standard Specification. The traffic signal plan shall include intersection striping, if required. Street improvements will not be involved in this project. ~/ 2) Preparation of detailed estimated of quantities and construe- • Lion costs prior to advertising for competitive bids. 3) Plans and technical specifications shall 6e approved by City. 4) Furnish original plans and specifications to City. TASK C. Ccnstru ct ion Phase Services Engineer shall be available for consultation during the construc- tion phase and make reconmendations on contract change orders. II. City shall provide engineer with assistance in the prepara- tion of the plans, specifications and estimates for project by providing the following: A. Copies of all improvement plans, atlas sheets or other drawings within project limits as required. B. Location of all subsurface utility facilities and other improvements. C. Plan checking on a no fee basis. D. City standard sheets if available. E. City shall prepare the required number of bid documents, advertise for bids, and perform construction management and inspection services. III. City shall reimburse engineer for services performed a lump sum fee of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) far Tasks A and B. Task C shall be paid on a time and materials basis at sixty dollars ($60.00) per hour and a mileage rate of twenty-five cents (25Q) per mile. City shall pay the engineer the prora to share of the fixed fee of work completed as determined 6y the City upon billing once each month at a regular City Council meeting. City shall have the right to audit the statement and remove from payment any item with which City is in disagreement, which ftem shall be there- after reviewed with the engineer. After full review, City shall make the final decision. u Engineer shall begin the work to be performed within five (B) days after mailing 6y City to engineer of a Notice to Proceed and shall diligently prosecute same and submit plans to Cfty for first plan check within 30 calendar days thereafter. • ~,1 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Engineer have executed this agreement as of the date first above written. -amity clerk ~ crre J 0. u5 ! sr __,ll City of Rancho Cucamonga ayor Lawrence S. Eisenhart, Consulting Engineer 23 • STAFF REPORT ~p C,vv.mlo,1,C ~r y( J < ~^ is zv GATE: January 16, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 8Y: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer iv; SUBJECT: Approval of Consultant Contract with James E. Crosby Engineers, Inc. for the reconstruction of Hermosa Avenue 130 feet south of Mignonette Street to Ninteenth Street. Contract not to exceed $8,906.00 • Attached is an agreement for Consultant Services for the design of the above subject project. Said services will include design evaluation and plans for street improvement, quantity and cost estimates and rough grade and curb staking for the project area. This project is to be constructed with Tract No. 11625 for which James E. Crosby is also acting as engineer. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached agreement awarding the design services far the above described project to James E. Crosby Engineers, Inc. and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Contract not to exceed $8,906.00 Respectfully subin ted, LB :S .kdr-• Attachments ~y • AGREEI4E`li FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEI4 ENT, made and entered into this day of 198_, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIdDNGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and James E. Crosby Engineers, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "fon su itan t". 'W ITN ESSETH: -~ WHEREAS, the City desires to prepare designs, construction plans, specifications and cost estimates for Nermosa Avenue' 130 feet south of Mignonette Street to Nin[eenth Street hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and qualifications and licences required by law to perform the services required under this Agreement in connection with said Project; and i WHEREAS, the City desires to retain "the Consultant for services her=_inafter described in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City Cau ncil at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of January, 1985, authorized the Mayor and City Clenk to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and betNeen the parties that: 1. DEF i;IITtONS. As used in this Agreement, the following definitions shall be applicable: a. Consultant. Consultant shall mean James E. Crosbv Engineers, Inc. a California Corporation located at 1820 E. Deere Avenue, Suite 100, Santa Ana, CA 92105. b. City. City shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130. ~, r c. City Council. City Council shad ':e an the City Council of the City of Rancho Cecamenea. d. Services. Services shall Wean the sere is=_s to ;__ aer°or~-ed by the Consultant pursuant :o this ;.g ree.aent. e. Satisf ac arv. Sa:isf ac tort' shah" mean satin ac to ry to Che City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. SCOPE OF SERI?C ES. Consultant ac roes to perform far, znd furnish to, the City the services descr'bed in Exhibit A, "Score of Services" attached hereto. 3. T?I!E FOR ?E?FORIdA;ICE. 1`ne Consulant agrees that it shall delinge oily and rasp onsib ly pursue the perrormance of the services required of it by this Agreement and that said services shall be comp feted within calendar days after executicn of this Aar=omen= in accord anc=_ with the Proje~ Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit 3. If a delay beyond the con irol of the Consultant is encountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upcn in writing Sy the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall present documentation satisfactory to the City tc substantiate any request far a time extension. 4. PAYMEPIT. Notwithstanding any other provisions of th i5 Agreement, upon satisfac tart' completion of the services descr ih ed in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES", (Exhibit A) the Consultant sh zll he compensated based upon the ac aai tine spent on the Pre„ect at the Consultant's standard hourly rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but shall not exceed a total amount of 58,906.00, • _p_ 1L • In the event of au thar izat icn, in writinc, Sy the Ci:y of char,aes from the work as indicated in exhibit A or for other grit:en per•nission authorizing addi :Tonal cork not contemplated herein, zddit Tonal comoe^sa[ion Shall be allowed for such extra wore based u0 on the Consultant's standard hourly rat=_s (See Exhibit CJ. The Consultant shall submit invoices wh ~~-n specify the aroa where work was comp let=_d and the associated tine for comol2tion to the City for approval, The Consultant agrees a invoice the City for services rendered not more often than once a month, lJOrk per ormed at the renuest of the City, outside the limit specified in this Agreement, is [o be designated as "Extra 'dork" en monthly invoices. 'dor't performed in connection with an authorized written change order gill be so designated on said invoice. 5. C[TY SUPP9R 7. The City shall provide the following items of • support to the Consultant; ~~ a. ProviCe a staff engineer to work with the ~:cnsultant for the purpose of giving advice and to provide teordin ation within the scope of this Agreement. b. Make available and provide all existing data and information relevant to the proposed Project. C. Provide all right-of-way negotiations. d. Provide environmental processing. e. Provide traffic fndex. f. Provide plans and specifications far bidding. g. Prepare and mail final utility notice. 6. SUSPE:VSIC'l. TER14ClAT(071 OR ABAN008ME,VT OF AGREEMEAi. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least fifteen (15) days prior to -3- 1~ written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shali immed iate l~ cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides other~sise. 'di th in thirty-five (36) dyys of service of said novice, the City shall pay to the Consultant all earned and unpaid fees and costs based upon the rotas attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but the sum so paid shall not exceed a dollar figure which Sears th=_ same prc~ortionate relationship to 58,906.00 as the quantity of ~.vork completed by the consultant bears to 100 of the work prescr bed herein. If the City su5aend s, terminal=_5 or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not .make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. 7. BREAC4 OF CCB TRACT. If the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall hav~ ten (10) days after service upon it of written ~oiice of such default in wn ich to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consu ltar~t fails to cure its def au tt within such per iad of time, the City shall have the right, no bvi thstand ing any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it nay he entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWt1E~4 SH?P OF OOCUI4E!1TS. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termi r.at ion, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sale property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. • _q_ ~~ • 9. INDE?E.`!DE`lT C09Td AC'CR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a •nholly independent contr ac ar. ';ei Lher the City nor any of its offic=_rs, employees or agents shall 'nave ccntrol over the conduct of the Consu pant or any of the Consultant's off icars, employees or agents, except as herein set fort!:. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent *.h at it or any of its off--=_rs, emo loy=es or agents are in any manner officers, emoi0yees or agents of the City. 10. LE;AC RES?C'1S:3D_IT'ES. The Consultant shall keeo its=_lf informed of Stata and Federal laws and reguia[ionswhich in any canner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performan re or its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consu'. Lnt shall at all tines observe and comp iy with all su cn lass and regulations. The City, its officers and • emo L^ye=_s sha 11 not he liable at law or in equity occasi nned by failure of the Cansuitan*- to camp ly with this section. 11. AS S: G18dE..T. The Consultant shall noC assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any moneys due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. 12. IIV SURAACE. The Consu itant shall maintain general liability and workers compensation insurance coverage effective on the first day of work and in full force throughout the full term of this Agreement. The policy or policies shall he underwrittan by insurers admitted to operate in the State of California, on forms no less bra ad in the scope of coverage than standard forms. Entire limits of li ahility maintained must be certified but in no event shall limits be less than specified hereinbelow. Any aggregate limitation of liability shall be separate as to the risks arising out of the subject matter of this proposal. -5- 19 Coverage :4inimum Lim i~ 'darters' Compensation & Employer's Liability $!00,000.00 Comprehensive General Liability/Cpmprehensiv=_ $SGO,GC0.00 Auto Liability La~^Sined single limit each occurance If reeves tad, the Consultant agrees to deposit with the City, certif ica h_s of insurance tp satisfy the City that insurance repuirements of this Agreement have been cpmpliedwith, and to keep such insurance in effect and the certificates therefore on deposit with the City during the entire term of this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGRE E`IENT, This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached he rota or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions .mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof, In the event of conflict be t.:een the to r~s, conditions or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions pf this Agreement shall prevail. IN 'dIiNESS 'dHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. n CIiY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT on ~ 162 is, ayor Date: ATT"c GT: Be ver iy Au the iec, pity ~ierx Dy: Richard I., BeiRle Title: Secretary - Treasure Date: January 9. 1985 APPROVED AS i0 FOR14: 8y ~ y orney • Date: -6- 2 J EXHIBIT :1 SCOPE OF SERVICES r1 L J This correspcrdence gill se^:e as 3 JrepOSaL tp JreVid2 Of=ice and ?field Engineering 'Ser/ipes _' _ tie abcve re. =rz^.c ed ?:o; ecC. The pro?osal 'is based on ?roviding Che _'oi_owing engineering serr_ces. :. OFFICE E`IG I~;EE3_`+G COST 1. ?rzpare a StreeC Laorovet:ent ?lan (l" _ +0' scai=_) c..c ?recess through the Ciry of 3anc o Cucar:cr.ga. 52,150. 00 2 Cuantity and Cost Esti-ate (?rzli.,.na rr ar.d __nai). 408. 00 3. 32search ex'_s ring uCi'_iCies in ar=_a ant show on Street imn rovet:eat Pian. 612. 00 >. Dete ^ine rough grading n_c assary to co^?lace pro?e^_t. J 816. 00 roT.~L 53,976. 00 II. 'ELJ EaGI:fEE.',I:dG 1. Cress section, existing 3e ^osa avenue (a?pre:cmateiy 700' on centerline) is 50' iacreme^.cs. $1,160. 00 Z. i.ocat=_ existing marhoies, vaults em. wit`.:ia_:fecced area. 870. 00 3. 3ou_:1 Grade Sta'.<es. 1,160. 00 4. Curs Stakes. 870. 00 5. ~tilit-r Stakes (adjust ~anhoies etc. to grade)• 870. 00 • TOT:1L $4,930. 00 - . __t er the plient _grees to the following cor.di tiers: 1. d prei±-inary Soils a.^.d Geology Repor. with Grading recor~endations will Se supplied by the client if :epuired. 2. ?izid Staking for cons ;. r:ceior. wii~ consist of one no rnal set of stakes fcz each furs tips of constrution. Lncremen tal staking of any one function is not prcvided. 3. acceptance and prese^ratdon of consc^~ctzpn stakes, once set, will Se the responsibility o= the client o: his des- ignated contractor. 4. Design or tors cructien staking for landscape items are no[ included. 5. The client shall pay the rest of all Governmental Fees, Per- mits, Bond ?remi~,:as, Title Company Charges, Delivery Charges, Blueprints and 3eproduction, Litigation, and all ocher charges not specifically covered by :"final cor.trac[ua1 agree- ment. 6. Engineering Services do nor include any Ecological or En- vironmental studies or consideraCions. 7. Engineerin3 Sen'_ces do not include any Scorn gain ?Lans, Hydrology and Hydraulic Saidies etc; if any are necessary a separate proposal will be negotiated ac chat time. • 3/ E}(HIBIT B ENGINEERING SCHEDULE 1. Cross Sections, existing Hermosa Ave. (approximate 700' on centerline) in 50' increments - 1/18/85. 2. Street Imo rovement Plan - 1st Submittal for plan check - 1/30/85. 3. Stzeet Impzovemet Plan - 2nd and Final Submittal for plan check - 2/12/85. The above schedule is based on City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council approval January 16, 1985 of the proposal dated December 22, 1984. s • 3y c:SS?31T C • re m'_LL Se pleas ec 70 ~: ovcdz en-i acc..`ar.a1 _._ ~ ser: is=_s =^a;. ~~ou nav -equcr - ~ . _,o t's__ ~.~ - _ '~2s' - or _ =~:.a-arc-catar_aLs scac~,:_a _ accoc~acc e''a' __ _.'- -„__,,._ ~ _acas: ~:: :C_~2L5 ~ 7.'..)0 ~ C .:CL'C _. 3ecasL~- c_a=:_.3 -.a_: _.. ~asc s_=_ _c _ ,a :._.na S 306.0( Z St__ct_=- 7es_-=_~' =_.~.a__ _ ==.,.e__.._ .__ 1, 224. 0C 3. 3e.__.._ ~ :. a'__ :, makes, _c_ se.. 870.0( TOT:1L $2,400.0( • • 33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 9, 1985 F~" b~ U To: City Counci l and 1977 City Manager From: nick Mayer, Park Project Coordinator Subject: Reject Hid for Beryl Park Soccer Field Ligh ii nq Project and Readvertiae for Competitive Bidding. (Consent Ca lender - January 16, 7985) Item "G" r1 U HACKOROOND: On January 9, 1985, the City received a single bid, in the amount of $76,000, from Paxin Electic Inc. of Lancaster, California, for the Beryl Pazk Soccer Pie ld Lighting Projec[. The Aid was cone iderably over the engineering eatimah of $37,000. Because of the high bid price and the fact only one bid was received, we recommend thet the single bid received from Paxin Eleciri c, Inc. be rejected and the project be readvertiaed for competitive bide. Prior to readvertiaing we will analyze the project further to determine why the initial project bid w89 higher than the ea time te, why only one bid was received and how we can make the project more attractive to Didde:a. R ECOMMEgOATION: That the City Council: 1. Reject the single bid, from Paxin Ele ctie, Inc. of Lancae ter, received for the Beryl Perk Soccer Pield Lighting Pzojectl end 2. Authorize the Community 5etvioe9 Department to re advertise the piojec[ foc competitive bids. 3Y nrmv nc n ~ unvn nr rn w vnw,n ~ STAFF REPORT ~~ Lv.....~'C ) °!. n Date: January 11, 1985 To: City Council and Si ty Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services bepactment 197i Subject: Approval Dy the City Council of entering agreement with P. Macki nzie Brown; Fieldman and Aolapp; Mi ldan Associates; and Recreation Systems, Inc. to provide requested preliminary servieea in relation to the poe si6le formation of the Rancho Cucamonga PLrk and A!c[eation Improvement Dig ttiet (P ,A .R.D.) (Consent Calendar - January 16, 1905) Item "H' • U The Community 9ervi cee Department hae not received the necessary information frog the above mentioned. The information is to !x in our office on Monday, January 14, 1985. I will forward inform Lion at that time. sr • STAFF REPORT ~~'~ Vey., °i'~ lie Date: January 9, 1983 ~~ p i- F U i; To: City Council and City Manager 197] Flom: ^ick Maye [, Park Project Coordi na toY Subject: Approval of the Terra Vista Northwest Neighborhood Park and Connector Trail Concept Plan (Consent Calendez January 16, 1983) Item "I" BACKGRONND; Terra Vista Northwest Neighborhood park ie a 5 acre park facility that will be the first park built in the Terra Vista Planned Community. Located adjacent to n proposed elementary school, the conceptual design fo the pa zk was coordinated with Central School District so that the parkeite plan and the conceptual plan fo[ the school athletic areas both eonsiderad the needs of the school children ae xell as well as the general community. The park plan proposes a eof tbnll field, a children's play appara tua area, a group picnic shelter and individual picnic areas, a reetroom, parking for 20 cars, lands taping and wa lkwaye connecting to the adjacent residential area and a connector trail to the Terra Vis [a Greenway. The main tree lined walkway through the perk xi 11 connect and continue through the adjacent school site to increase the joint park/school use concept. The attached exhibits delineate the Terra Vim to Northwest Neighborhood Park and Connector Trail. The Park Development and Planning Commission have reviewed the project and recommend that [he City Council review and approve the perk and connector it ail plane. This park and trail will be conatruc tad by Lewis Homes of California ae required by the Terra Vista Park Implementation Plan. They will proceed with working drawi nqs upon approval of the conceptual plans by City Council xi th an anticipated park cone traction start dote in March 1985. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council revi ex and approve U1e conceptual plan for Terra Via to Northwest Neighborhood Park and Connector Trail. attachment 3~ s ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ./-. ~ ~~ ~ j t /~ ji, _ __ __ . , ~,~, ; ~ ~ ~4 _, ,~, ,Q_ ~~ ~...--~ \~. ` ~ . ~1 ~ - ~~aJ::.:~ ,,' ^ ~ (~ ~~ ./ ~t ~' ~ ~i ~/ ;x ,~~ ~ MASTER PLAN O TERRA VISTA ' NORTHWEST.. NEIGHBORH'DOD PARK ,.: 3~ TERRA VISTA NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ~+` *, ~ COMMUNITY TRAIL SYSTEM WIDE CONCRETE WALK- 4 ~~y I. I F"~+~ ~ ' .;,: Ip4 ••I TERRA,VISTA SCHOOL t1 • SCHOOL PARKMG ~ RAINAGE ~~ ~ ~ ]i. ' ~ I^ ~Qt ~ ^ Vf:. /~P`NJ CoNNI!cTOtL tnni~ ~~ ,~ . =~- ! . ., OD Date: January 9, 1985 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT To: City Council and City Manager Fcom: ei 11 Holley, Director, Community Services Department ((~~ c 2~ 1 Y 4 O C s a. Z F,I U'd ~> I97i Subject: Approval by the City Council to provide building nodifica Lion to the Lions Park Community Center for the purpose of operational efficienry. (Consent Colander O1/76/SS) Item 'J' • C, J The Community Service Department request authorization to "rework' a portion of the hallway area near the existing office to provide a proper staff area in which to conduct Wainesa with members of the General Public. Currently when someone comes in and wi ehes to di scuae a 6ueineas item, or program ideas, or simply facility use, it meet generally moat be handled while standing in the lobby area and competing with people looking for directions, tap dancers, karate figh Cera, etc. Need lees to aey, Chia ie not a very professional nor efficient way to handle our clients. tie have drafted the necessary modificati one "in house" to correct this eacal la Ling Problem and have had thm reviewed by Building and Safety end they are Eound to be workable and complete. There will be little if any di eruption of service to the public during this period of time and the modification could be completed in a week to ten days. It is recommended that the Community Service Department be authorized 6y Council to solicit bids and award cone traction can tract in an amount not to exceed $4,900, to[ the construction of building modifies bone to Lions Perk Community Center, those funds to be appropriated from the Recreation Services Enterprise Fund. If I can answer any goes [ions please feel free to give me a call. 39 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 9, 1965 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department c~~oyo 3~ a ~' ~ n y ~~ y p A F' D ~'Z j (9;; - 1 Subject: Approval from the Park Development Fund the sum of $64,037, plus contingency, for construction of Church Street Park (Consent Calendar - January 76, 1985) Item 'K' In September of 1982, the ('•ty entered into an agreement with Marlborough Development for the 6.6G "^. re Church Street Park site. Included in that agreement was tha donation of land, current value eatima red at 5399,000, and construction costs up to a maximum of $285,644.36, per the park development Eo[mula in place at the time. During the last No and one half years, construction cog es have risen and the loa bid of $349,680.40 ezceeda by $64,036.04 the construction obli gaiion of Marlborough Development. This ass anticipated to occur when the agreement was formulated but, unfortunately there seemed no 'reaeoneble and fair' way to avoid it. (As a side note, this agreement was being developed as the Foran Bill and was "zol ling" through the State Legislature. The signing of the agreement secured the original total obligation $630,000, in place rather than reducing it to a total of 5207,000 in a post-FOren climate.) Bottom line is this Marlborough can award a contract to Ha this Environmental of Aencho Cucamonga, low bidder, Eor the amount of their bid of $349,680.40. The City can pay to Mar lborough the additional $64,036.04 from the Park Development Fund needed to augment Marlborough's agreed oh ligation in order to cover the Eull bid amount and thereby provide a full service park. Cone [ruction will commence shortly thereafter. Council Options 1. Appropriate from the Park Oeve lopment Fund $64, 036.04r plus a 6a project contingency, for the cone truc[ion of Church Street Park, to be diabureed to Marlborough Development Company as clatme tot aervi cea are received and approved. 2. Scale down the park to reduce coat by $64.036.04 (deleting playground, ree troome, ate.) Staff Recommendation: option one in staffe vies ie the only vi ah le way in ahi ch to proceed. Building a "e uba tendard" park ai thou[ playgrounds and reatrooma et th is time Ionly to rose back and add Ghee later mould not be a financially sound move. `Therefore, OPTION ONE IS RECOMI~@ND® yo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c~~^a+v ~ „y~ STAFF REPORT , • ~; ~ , r - u, ~ w A ~', r,; ~ ID DATE: January 16; 1985 iy;; T0: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BV: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS FOR CONSULTANTS FOR THE 1985 N L OR AG REVENU BOND ROGRAM BACKGROUND: The City Council, at its meeting of August 1, 1964, adopted Resolution 84-218 which authorized the application for E150 Million of Residential Mortgage Subsidy Bond Allocation to the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee. To help expedite the anticipated 1985 Mortgage Bond Program, a team of consultants will be used. This team will consist of Stone and Youngberg, Bond Underwriter; Jones, Hall, Hill and • White, Band Counsel; Empire Economics, Feasibility Consultant; and Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates, Financial Advisor. These firms have served as staff in the preparation of the previous two housing mortgage bond issues. Our experience in the past years has shown that the consultant team, as a group, is efficient and are experts in the field of Mortgage Bonds. In addition, this group of consultants has worked worked well with City staff, the Redevelopment Agency, and the past pan is ipatfng developers and by utilizing this same group for the expected 1985 program working continuity can be achieved. The agreements which are attached to this staff report are very similar to previous years' agreements. Briefly, they are recapped as follows: Stone and Younobera (Underwriter) - The agreement is fer the firm of tone and Young erg to serve as managing underwriter for the City to handle the structuring of the financing and marketing of the bonds and other provisions which may relate to an underwriter. The final fee is subject to negotiation upon entering into an agreement with the City prior to the sale of the Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Jones, Hall, Hill and White (Bond Counsel) - The Bond Counsel will prepare the specialized documents assot fated with the bond issue. The Bond Counsel will attend the meetings, participate in selection of financing methods, review the official statement, and provide consuitatian over the lending period. Compensation has been negotiated and is based upon the same level of fees for iegal services rendered with respect to the previous two programs. yi Agreements for Consultants January 16, 1985 Page 2 • Empire Economics (Feasibility Consultant) - This firm's task will be to perform a market demand study. As Dart of this market demand study, the consultant will update the home purchase price and the income qualifications which will be used not only for the 1985 issue, but for the 1983 and 1984 issues as well. The market demand study is also a very improtant report needed 6y the rating agencies when the bonds are rated. The consultant's fee is based on the 1985 program having both a Redevelopment Agency and and City bond program. Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates (Financial Rdvisor) - The consultant services will be to advise the City and staff, including the underwriter and bond counsel, on the bond financing, tfm ing, and terms of the bond structure. As in the past, the expertise of the consultant is useful in assuring that the City is able to achieve the best possible deal in completing the bond issue. All compensation is derived from the proceeds of this bond issue and developers commitment fees. Further, all administrative costs are paid similarly. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the • agreements and authorize execution by the mayor. Resp(gctfully s milted, t, r. --._- ~""'°'Sac 1 am, AI Community Development Director JL:LDO:jr Attachment: Agreements • y} • ~'!J~/) STO\E BsYOL'\C=BERG I`~----i~ MEMBEN$ a4CIIIC SiO~N E%C4ANGE l Decmeber 14, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. C. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Ms. Linda Daniels Honorable Council Members: This letter will serve as an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Stone L Youngberg to serve as Managing Undervn•iter to the City until the parties enter into an actual Purchase Contract regarding the negotiated sale of single family Mortgage Revenue Bonds to be issued by the City (the "Bonds") You have informed us that the City has requested an allocation from the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee and upon receipt of the allocation intends to issue the Bonds and provide funds for mortgages on residences and projects to be built by various developers and for this purpose requires the services • of a Managing Underwriter to structure the financing and to enter into a Purchase Contract with the City to purchase the Bonds through a negotiated price that is agreeable to both parties. The Ctty may direct all or a portion of its allocation to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and may pursue two simultaneous bond issues. This Agreement will serve as the basis fora negotiated sale of mortgage revenue bonds between Stone L Youngberg and the City or Agency. tt is understood that the Fanaging Underwriter will take primary responsibility for structuring and marketing the financing but at all times will maintain a close relationship and dialogue with the City staff and the City's financial advisor, Fieldman, Rol app L Associates. As Managing Underwriter, we will use eur utmost efforts 'to raise funds at the most reasonable rates attainable in the market under then existing conditions. In amplification of the understanding between the City and the Managing Underwriter, Stone L Youngberg agrees to undertake the below listed services and functions. A. Structuring the Financings: 1. As Managing Underwriter to the City, Stone 6 Youngberg will work with your staff in designing the scope of an economic feasibility study addressing the marketability of the projects and their projected cash flow. Stone L Youngberg will also assfst the City in the review and application of the study's results. • ONE CALIFORNM STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 91111 • pis( 911.1711 43 City of Rancho Cucamonga December 14, 1984 • Page 2 2. Stone d Youngberg will work with the City's bond counsel in recomnendfng specific terms and conditions affecting the basic security of the Bonds. 3. Stone d Youngberg will assist the City in selecting a major bankfn9 firm to serve as trustee for the mortgage lending programs. Ue will assist bond counsel in preparing a list of services required of the ,trustee. 4. Stone d Youngberg will assist the City and developers in selecting qualified mortgage lenders to originate and service the mortgage loans. Stone d Youngberg will assist the City define the rules and regulations to be adopted by the City that prescribe standards by which mortgages are purchased and serviced. 5, Stone 6 Youngberg will prepare detailed mortgage originating and servicing guides that define specific procedures for selecting eligibile mortgages and mortgagors and sets forth reporting requirements for the servicing of such loans. 6. Stone d Youngberg wf 11 dt rect a cash flow analysis that evaluates the • revenue derived from the mortgage loans, including prepayments and penalties, and determines the optimum maturity structure based on market conditions and security provisions and recommends an investment program to maximize yield on investable funds. 7. Stoned Youngberg will prepare the text of a bond prospectus for sale of the securities. Such prospectus will include a description of the bonds and their security, the parties to the agreements, the project, the mortgage lending program, and pertinent financial and economic data. In preparation of such prospectus we will exercise due dfligences in the ascertainment of all material facts and circumstances regarding the project and Tn thei'r disclosure in the prospectus. 8. Stoned Youngberg will contact one or more rating agencies and provide them with sufficient information to obtain a rating on the bonds prior to their sale. 9, Stone d Youngberg will represent the City at any necessary information meeting or meetings. (Depending upon the results of the feasibility study and/or the status of the municipal bond market, such meetings may or may not De necessary.) B. tarketing the Bonds: 1. The Managing Underwriter will use Its best efforts to accomplish the • formal marketing of the Bonds which should be accomplished at the earl test dates possible consistent with sound investment banking and y S, • City of Rancho Cucamonga December 14, 1984 Page 3 underwriting principles. It is intended that, once purchased by Stone & Youngberg, the Bonds will be re-offered to the public on the basis of an inmediate "Dona fide public offering". Stone 6 Youngberg may form a group of investment banking firms for the purpose of underwri tf ng and selling the Bonds. 2. At the designated time for re-sales of the Bonds, Stone E Youngberg will submit an offer to the City to purchase the Bonds, subject to pertinent resolutions, the Official Statement, a minimum rating of investment grade (Baa or 888) by either Moody's Investors Service and/or Standard d Paor's Corporation, and all other necessary documents, approvals, and proceedings governing such Bands having been determined Dy Dond counsel, the City, and the Managing Underwriter to be satisfactory in all respects for financing purposes. 3. At least one day prior to the submission of any such formal offer to the City for the purchase of the Bonds, Stone b Youngberg will indicate to the City the interest rate or rates, the purchase price from the City, and public offering price of the bonds which we then estimate will be included in such offer. • C, General Provisions Relating to the City and the Managing Underwriter: 1. The City agrees to make available to Stone 6 Youngberg without cost sufficient copies of the economic and other reports, agreements, contracts, resolutions, Preliminary and Final Official Statements, and other relevant documents pertaining to the projects, the City, or the bonds as reasonably may be required from time to time for the prompt and efficient performance by Stone 8 Youngberg of their obligations hereunder. 2. Stoned Youngberg shad pay its own out-of-pocket and other expenses, the cost of Blue Sky and Investment Memoranda used by the Underwriters and all advertising expenses in connection with the public offering of the Bonds. 3. The City shall pay from the proceeds of the Bonds or other funds of the City all costs and expenses customarily paid therefrom, including the cost of printing the bonds, Official Statements and other documents, the fees and expenses of its legal counsel, special tax counsel, financial consultants, accountants, rating services, special agency counsel, and of any other experts retained by the City fn connection with the financing. 4. It is expressly understood and agreed, and the City hereby recognizes that in perfoming its activities pursuant to a negotiated sate that Stone L Youngberg is acting solely on its own behalf as the prospective manager of an underwriting group which plans to submit to the City a proposal to purchase the bonds for resale. Nothing herein shall be construed to make the Managing Underwriter an employee or 4'j City of Rancho Cucamonga December 14, 1984 Page 4 financial, fiscal, or other advisor of the City, or to establish any fiduciary relationship beteen the City and the Managing Underwriter. 5. This agreement shall extend to the date of sale of the Bonds as contemplated herein, when the foetal bond Purchase Contract is entered into by the parties. 6. Upon termination of this agreement, the City shall be under no further obligation to the Managing Underwriter hereunder, except that the City is obligated to pay to the Managing Underwriter any expenses incurred on behalf of the City pursuant to Paragraph C(3) of this agreement should the City not sell the bonds to the Managing Underwriter on behalf of the Underwriters pursuant to Section B of this agreement. 7. It is mutually understood and agreed that all parties will take whatever action is deemed reasonable to consummate the financing in the shortest period of time consistent with the State's Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee schedule and sound investment banking principles. • E. Key Person Designation It is understood and agreed that the principal individual on behalf of Stoned Youngberg with primary responsibility for the City's financing will be Scott C. Sollers, partner. Principal support will be provided by Warren E. Mfiler. Upon your acceptance set forth below, this letter will constitute an agreement between the City and the undersigned. ///~ /~ STONE d YOUN®ERG // By Accepted this day of 1984 CITY OF RAWCHO-CIJCA11011GA By SCS:cn 0144s yb n u AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES HOME MORTGAGE FINANCING PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 16th day of January, 1985, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR+,IA, a municipal corporation (the "City"), and JONES HALL HILL & WHITE, A Professi oral Law Corporation, San Francisco, California ("Attorneys"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City is undertaking a home mortgage financing program ("the Program") within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and proposes to finance the further costs thereof by a again conducting Home Mortgage Revenue Bond proceedings; WHEREAS, Attorneys are experienced in municipal and municipal bond law and in the conduct of proceedings for accomplishing such a Program and conducting financing proceedings therefor; WHEREAS, the City intends to assign a portion of its allocation to issue • mortgage revenue bonds to its Redevelopment Agency and it is appropriate that this Agreement contain provision for legal services with respect to the allocation assigned to the Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, as follows: 1. Duties. Attorneys shall provide the following services: a. Consult and cooperate with the City's consultants, underwriters and the administrative officers of the City in the formulation of a coordinated legal and financf al Program; b. Prepare all documents, Including, without ltmi tattoo, ordinances, indentures and resolutions necessary for the proper conduct of proceedings for the issuance of securities for the purpose of financing the Program; c. Prepare and provide a receipt for the sale of securities, a receipt for the proceeds of securities, a signature and no-litigation certificate, a nan- arbitrage certification and all other documents required in connection with the delivery of the securities; • y7 d. Aid in the preparation of transcripts of the conduct of the • financing proceedings necessary to accompany the delivery of securities; e. Apply for and obtain any Internal Revenue Service or other rulings necessary to assure tax exempt status of the securi lies, or as required by the purchaser of the securities; f. Analyze and determine the need for obtaining a permit to issue securities under the Securities Laws (State or Federal) or no-action letters from the Securities and Exchange Commission and California Corporations Commission; g. Upon due and proper completion of proceedings, provide its legal opinion unqualifiedly app raving in all regards the legality of all proceedings for the authorization, issuance and delivery of any securities or other transactions related to the Program, which opinion shall inure to the benefit of the purchasers of the securities; and h. Provide other necessary services generally expected of bond counsel not listed above. In addition, Attorneys shall render all other services generally provided by bond counsel, including, without limitaci on, rendering any and all necessary legal advice to the City with respect to legal questions on issues that may arise relative to the f?na ncing during such time as the bonds are being contemplated, processed, issued, and sold, and during such time as the same are outstanding. 2. Comoen sation. Compensation fer the services shall be based on the following percentages of securities issued and sold: • One-haif of one percent (1/2°;) of the principal amount of the securities to a principal amount of 35,000,000; plus One-quarter of one percent (1/4°b) of the principal amount of the securities over 35,000,000 up to 320,000,000; plus one-tenth of one percent (1/10 ;) of the principal amount of the securities over 320,000,000; provided, however, that the total compensation payable to Attorneys hereunder, incl ud ing amounts payable pursuant to the nett succeeding paragraph 3, shall not exceed in the aggregate 3120,000. In addition, Attorneys shall be reimbursed for out-of-state travel expenses, for copying and closing costs and for the expenses of delivery and messenger services. Our fees and ez penses are payable solely upon bond sale and delivery, from the proceeds of the Bonds and developer fees, and not otherwise. • 2 y8 • 3. Redevelopment Agency Mortpaae Revenue Bonds. If the City shall assign a portion of its allocation from the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee and the Redevelopment Agency shall issue mortgage revenue bonds pursuant thereto, then Attorneys agree to provide the same legal services to the Redevelopment Agency as herein described for the following compensation: One-half of one percent (1/2°;) of the principal amount of the securities sold by the Agency to a principal amount of 55,000,000; plus One-quarter of one percent (1/4,°;) of the principal amount of the securities sold by the Agency over 55,000,000 up to 520,000,000; plus one tenth of one percent (1/10.°;) of the principal amount of the securities sold by the Ag enty over 520,000,000; provided, however, that the total compensation payable to Attorneys hereunder, including amounts payable pursuant to the next preceedi ng paragraph 2. shall not exceed in the aggregate 5127 ,U•00 , In addition, Attorneys shall he reimbursed for out-of-sta ce travel expenses, for copying and closing costs and for the expen zes of delivery and messenger services. Our fees and expenses are payable solely upon bond sale and delivery, from the proceeds of the securities sold by the Agency and developer fees, and not • otherwise. 4. Exceptions. The following services are excepted from the services to be rendered for such percentage fees: a. Any computer services for verification of cash flow schedules relating to the Program. b. Any services to be rendered in any litigation involving the City. c. Any services required fn obtaining Federal, Sta ie or other subventions or loans other than a sale and delivery of municipal securities Lo any Federal or State agency. For any such se rvlces which Atiorn eys are directed to render for and on behalf of the City, compensation shalt be on a reasonable fee basis to be agreed upon, other than a validation action, which, if necessary, shall 6e handled for no additional charge. 5. Scope of Employment. It is intended that this Agreement apply to one series of securf ties issued for the Program. The City is not precluded from employment of other attorneys to handle subsequent series of securities. It is understood that this Agreement may be terminated by either party on reasonable notice to the other without liability to the City. • 3 ti" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents t: be executed by their respective officers and representatives thereunto duly. authorized, the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation _ By City Clerk (S EA L) JONES NALL HILL & WHITE, A Professional Law Corporation By t~. Andrew C. Hail, J APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney • • 4 S: ~r~~ ~~~ F~ Po„d.ea.~ 719 :A)uc~u~Rmn J/iL~L ~.~.dPa.~d+. ~~a~a...io 92374 r-- , I4 793-8245 J .SPRo~~: (- December 11, 1984 Mayor Jon Mikels City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 gas el ine Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Market/Feasibility Study for Rancho Cucamonga's 1985 Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue Dear Mayor Mikels: We want to first congratulate you on pursuing a mortgage revenue bond program for 1985. Our analysis of the economic impacts of various mortgage revenue bond programs has revealed that not only do they provide prospective purchasers with "affordable" interest rates but they also generate substantial employment opportunities for local residents as well, both in the construction as well as the retail sectors. Purpose This letter will serve as a proposal, and upon execution, an Agreement regarding Lhe Market/Feasibility Study for Rancho Cucamonga's 1985 Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue. Accordingly, Lhis Agreement will provide you with a description of the research that will be conducted, along with Lhe performance schedule and Cinane ial considerations for the study. Background Empire Economics specializes in performing market/feasibility studies for residential, commercial and industrial projects located throughout the Southern California region. We recently conducted Market/Feasibility Studies for San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Colton, Corona, Lancaster, Pomona, and Oceanside, Accordingly, we feel that our experience on these issues should be beneficial in determining • the optimal proSect portfolio for the Rancho Cucamonga's 1985 Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue. S~ Mayor Jon Mikels • December 11, 1984 Page Two Description of Economic Research The primary objective of the market/feasibility study is to determine the optimal portfolio of projects for the mortgage revenue bond program, based upon the marketability and feasibility of the candidate projects. This will be accomplished through a comprehensive and professional analysis of the following factors: general economic trends, housing market demand and supply conditions, Doth presently as well as in the future, and the economic feasibility of the projects. Accordingly, the specific components of the study are as follows: A. Introduction • Dese ription of Rancho Cucamonga • Description of the Candidate Projects • Methodology • Delineation of the Market Areas B. Housing Demand in the Project Market Area * Demographic/Economic Trends in San Bernardino • County • Composition and Growth Potential of San Bernardino County's Economic Bases • Forecast of Housing Demand for the Project Market Region • Distribution of Housing Demand in Lhe Project Market Area Housing Product Type and Price Ranges » Adjustments to Demand frr both the Maximum Housing Pricesand also the Maximum Incomes for Purchasers C. Housing Supply and Captu^e Rate for the Candidate Projects • Comparable Projects in the Project Market Area • Characteristics of the Comparable Projects - Competitiveness of the Candidate Projects • Projects in Prior Mortgage Aevenue Bond Issues • Capture Rates for the Candidate Projects D. Feasibility of the Mortgage Revenue Bond Program • Adjusted Demand for the Candidate Projects (Section B) • Capture Rate for the CandidateProjects(Seotion C) • Absorption Schedule and Sell-out Time for the • Candidate Projects • Feasibility of the Mortgage flevenue Bond Program 5 • Mayor Jon Mikels December it, 1984 Page Three Thus, the market/feasibility analysis systematically proceeds from various general demographic, economic, and financial market conditions and arrives at the specific market absorption schedule and feasibility of the candidate projects in the Rancho Cucamonga's Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue. Performance Schedule and Financial Considerations The study will be conducted directly by Joseph T. Janezyk, Ph.D., the President of Empire Economics and a Professor of Economics at California State University, San Bernardino. The research for Lhe Market/Feasibility Study will commence upon your execution of this Agreement and will be completed within three to four weeks thereafter. Progress reports will be provided upon request, if so desired. The fees for the consulting services are as follows: Market/Feasibility Study is 59,000, the Supplemental Services are • a maximum of 53,000, and the fee for the Executive Summary is 51,500 for a total of 510,500-513,500. Specifically, the supplemental fees for the market/feasibility study depends upon the following factors: Presentation of various mortgage fund allocation scenarios for the candidate projects (no prior developer reservations) The utilization of mortgage funds by projects in Rancho Cubamonga's prior bond issues (an explanation oP funds not utilized thusfar). The potential for a split Assemble Bill 67355 and Senate Bill 699 issue. The payment of Lhe fee Ss as follows: For Lhe Market/Feasibility Study, a retainer of 57,000 and a final payment of 52,000-E5,000. For the Executive Summary, the fee of E1,500 may be paid at the closing. Any additional consulting services, such as travel Lo San Francisco, Sacramento or New York, if necessary, will be billed separately. The fee for the Market/Feasibility Study includes four copies of the study; any additional copies will be billed aeDarately. S; Mr. Jon Mikels December it, 1984 Page Four Closing To indicate your agreement with the above terms and conditions, sign in the designated space below and return one copy of this agreement to us. We are certainly looking forward mortgage revenue bond program. ~'` 5 ncerely Js ~ .V c,_Ph`~. Ecogomic Con$yd'tant JTJ:re APPROVED: City of Raneho Cucamonga Mayor Jan Mikels to assisting you with your APPROVED: Date ~ Empire Economics Date Joseph T. Janezyk • \J • 5' Y Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSUL ~ANi$ January 2, 1985 RonoraDle Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga and Board of Directors City o£ Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency 9320 C Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Financial Consultant Services Mortgage Revenue Bond Financing Programs • Gentlemen: This letter proposal is submitted in accordance with a request from Jack Lam, D'.rector of Community Development. The proposal is concerned with furnishing financial consultant services to De performed in conjunction with the Mortgage Revenue Bond Financing Program ("Program") contemplated Dy both of your Agencies. We understand that our responsi6111ties to the Ctty and the RDA will be as follows: "Consultation with the underwriter, bond counsel and others as necessary, concerning bond financing, timing, terms, and their structure Including the review and comment on: - Structure of the plan of financing - Developer agreements and commitment See schedules - Mortgaging sale and servicing agreements - Draft of preliminary official statement 8091 Hnelneee Center Drlvs, 9ulte 209 Irvine, California 82716 • (71e) 762.2961 Feasibility study Other financing documents necessary to establish terms oS the bond issue." The services which we x111 provide are as follows: Scope of York A. General Assist in providing financial consultant services in connection with any and all Financing requirements as they pertain to the proposed Program. In this connection, we will make available to you the research, statistical and consultant staffs of the Heldman, Rolapp and Associates organization to such extent as they may be necessary and helpful. B. Specific Services 1) Review of Documents. Review of the financial aspects of all documents pertaining to the Program. This includes review and comment on developer. agreements, commitment fee schedules, mortgaging sale and servicing agreements, and marketing feasibility studies. 2) Municipal Bond Market. Furnish the City with information concerning the then current municipal bond market conditions and make recommendations as to the technical details of the financing, including maturity schedules, funds, covenants, prior redemption schedules, and other details which will, in our opinion, make the proposed financing moat acceptable to the designated underwriter; and, therefore, marketable at the lowest possible interest rate. 3) Negotiated Sale. Assist the Clty and the RDA in negotiating the sale of the contemplated bonds to the designated underwriter. In this connection, we will review and comment and advise the City and the RDA on coupon rates, the bond discount, and the underwriter's gross profit Sn an effort to assure a satisfactory net effective interest rate. • MUNICIPAL FINANCIgi CONSUI TANtS ~. 4) Otticlal Statement. Assist the City and the RDA in the review of the Ctticial Statement prepared by the underwriter. If a due diligence meeting is held, we will participate in such due diligence meeting and assist you in the examination of pertinent financial data. 5) Consultation/Advice. Attend any meetings concerning the Program when deemed necessary, and, in atldition, will be available for consultation and advice until such time as the bonds issued to finance the Program have been sold. These meetings include, but are not limitef to, work sessions and seminars and conferences with other professional consultants associated with the Program, prospec live developers, and lenders. 6) Nego tlations xi th State of Calif orn la. Assist in pertinent negotiations with appropriate State of California agencies. ~) Project Negotiations. Assist in negotiations • with developers, lenders, and others concerned with the Program. 8) Project Criteria. Assist in developing Program criteria in accordance with the City's housing element plan. 9) Critical Path. Assist in the development of the critical path of events. 10) Attendance at Bond Closing. We will compute closing figures including accrued interest and assist in coordinating the events of the closing. 2. Feea The fees for services rendered hereunder shall be paid 6y the City and the Redevelopment Agency pro rata based upon the par value of bonds sold by each Agency and will be as follows: $2,500 at the time the Agencies receive the one-half point application fee from the developers. U MUNICIPAL CINr1Nrlnl CONSVITnNTS $2,500 at the time the Agencies receive the commitment fee from the developers. E15,000 at the time the bonds sold to finance the Programs are delivered to the underwriter. Bzpenses We will pay our own out-of-pocket expenses; provided, however, that 1£ travel outside of Southern California is necessary in the furtherance of the Program and such travel is authorized by the City and the RDA, the City and the RDA will reimburse uS for all Costs of such travel and expenses incident thereto, including lodging and subsistence. 4. Terms The City and the RDA may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice thereof to Consultant, provided that the City and the RDA shall be obliged to pay us for all work performed and al l direct costs incurred prior to receipt of notice of termination by us. It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not • intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an expert financial advisory capacity only. If the foregoing proposal Ss satisfactory to you, please take appropriate action to authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the duplicate copy hereof. Respectfully submitted, FIELDMAN, ROL /P AND ASSOCIATES 1 ` I ~ /' lam Fie dman WLF/pae • MUNICIPµ RNANCinI CONSVUANfS ~a • \J Executed on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. CITY OF RA:7CH0 CUCAMONCA Ay. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ATTEST: MUNICIPµ P~NAIM.IM CWSULT~NTS Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates • MUNIf.~PAI FINANCIAL CONSVUAN~S EXHIBIT "A" SCHE'vULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1985 Principals of the Firm $85.00 Per Hour • Technical Assistants 545.00 Per Hour C, J 2001 Buelneee Conter Drive, Snlte 208 Irvine, Cnliforn la 02716 (7l4) 768.2781 LO nrmv nc+ n n wrnvn nnn ~ wTnvn . STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1985 T0: Mayor and Memhers of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior RDA Analyst SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 12726 - A-M COMPANY ~ ~~ Mo'tic G I 9 F; ~ it r9;; On November 7, 1984, an appeal was filed regarding the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract 12126. At the meeting the City Council received testimony from several surrounding residents pertaining to the developer's provisf on for pedestrian access through the proposed fire lane connecting to Avalon Street. lJ In consideration of the surrounding residents' concerns, the City Council approved Tentative Tract 12726 provided that (1) afire lane, with no pedestrian access, be provided which connects the proposed tract's circulation system with the existing Avalon Street; and, (2) a s e,arate pe~~si.r ion casement be provided which connects the proposed tract to the Droperty to the south. This is graphically illustrated in Exhibit "A". On December 14, 1984, the Planning Commission reviewed Tentative Tract Map 12830 which encompasses what fs now the Houtz Chicken Ranch. During their review, the Commission considered an alternative to the needed fire lane and pedestrian easement. This alternative, illustrated in Exhibit "8", would relocate the required fire lane to a north/south direction and combine ft with the needed pedestrain circulation. This alternative, which was acceptable to the Fire District, surrounding residents, the developer and City staff, was approved by the Planning Commission. s Due to this change, which was based on information not available at the November 7, 1984 City Council meeting, it is necessary that the City Council revise Resolution 84-289 in accordance with the Commission's action of December 14, 1984. In consulting the City Attorney, it was felt that the subsequent Planning Commfssion action on Tentative Tract 1283) was in keeping with the intent of the City Council regarding the appropriate pedestrian and emergency access for the area. In the City Attorney's opinion it was felt that these proposed minor alterations to the Tentative Tract Map approval meet the City Council's inttfal action and, therefore, could be handfed through a consent calendar action. ~, Tentative Tract 12726 - A-M Company January 16, 1985 Page 2 • Staff would recommend adoption of Resolution 84-289-A by the City Council which would bring the requirements of Tentative Tract 12726 and Tentative Tract 12830 in compliance. Res c 11 sub fitted, /:~ ~~_. .., WRck G ez , Qit P1aiRTer IRG:LD:jr //Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Original Pedestrian b Emergency Access Design Exhibit "B" - Revised Pedestrian b Emergency Access Design Resolution 84-289-A • G> • RESOLUTION N0. 84-289- A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12126, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BERYL AVENUE AND SOUTH OF 19TH .STREET IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1984, the Planning Commission conditionally approved Tentative Tract MaD 12126, subject to conditions as set forth in Resolution 84-97; and, WHEREAS, on the 20th day of September, 1984, Mr. William B. Blanchard, a resident adjacent to the proposed Tentative Tract Map 12726, filed an appeal in accordance with the time prescribed by the Development Code; and, NHEREAS, on the 7th day of November, 1984, the City Council met to review and consider the appeal pertaining to Tentative Tract Map 12126; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did conditionally approve Tentative Tract tAap 12126, and in so doing the City Council modified the conditions adopted by the Planning Commission through Resolution 84-97; and, . WHEREAS, subsequent to the City Council decision the developer submitted Tentative Tract Map 12830 for the property directly south of the subject map; and, WHEREAS, the revised circulation of Tentative Tract Map 12830 affects the conditions of approval of City Council Resolution 84-289; and, WHEREAS, the revised circulation proposal meets the intent of the City Council decision which was made on November 1, 1984 and, therefore, the Council wishes to revise the conditions of Tentative Tract Map 12726 so as to be consistent with the most recent plans and information. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract 12726 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvement of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; • ~3 (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of • development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement required by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivisicn. (g) That this project wii7 not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map 12726 is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. A combination pedestrian and emergency vehicular access easement, with a minimum width of 26 feet, shall be provided. The access easement shalt lead • from the subject tract in a north/south manner and shall connect with the circulat ton system of the property to the south (proposed Tentative Tract 12830). 2. The final design of the pedestrian and emergency access is subject to approval by the City Planner and must be completed prior to the map's recordation. 3. The maintenance of the twenty-six (26) foot pedestrian and emergency easement shall be subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, and done prior to the map's recordation. 4. The 26-foot pedestrian and emergency access easements shall include water easements to the satisfaction of Cucamonga County Water District. 5. The developer shall make a good faith effort in contacting all of the property owners abutring the west tract boundary to obtain their permission to construct a single fence on the property line. • Gy • 6. The final design of Tentative Tract Map 12726 is subject to review and approval by the Technical Review Committee. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. Aesthetically appropriate signing shall be installed to distinguish public from private streets at the affected intersections to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. PASSED, APPRDVEO, and RDOPTED this 16th day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: RBSENT: on D. Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe et, ity erk C. L4 • ~~._ I I ;7 ,, ~ ;.~ ,~~ ~ , ~;, ~~: `~` `~ ~> ~ ' ~Il~~iz D° i ii~nmoo • =az `+i :~ N W om n v / a s~ o. i ~1 ti Z a ~ , H z 2 ~ ti ie 4 'o n u a ' \~~~ e ° ~_._.' a H C!~ ~o a y V N ~ 4 O~ ., _, 4 \I 1 i '~. ~.. AVAWN ~/ I I '- ~~._ S [/ 'fT X1830 ..! 'f'r 137.E T~.. ~ Tf11830 ~ticsfrlnn /F.Ynu ~' . 7 h~bl~' f'R„ • L 8 :ko Attachments • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DRTE: January 16, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kral 1, Engineer Technician G~'NO,~ ~~ ~ ~~ < ~~ ~! r Ia ___ 1917 I SUBJECT: Approval of a Pipeline License between the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and the City in connection with D.R. 84-02 located at the northwest corner of 8th Street and Rochester. Also approval of an agreement between the developer, Lincoln Properties and the City. The A.T. & S.F. Railway Company has issued the attached 7ipeline license to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of a storm drain pipe beneath the tracks in connection with the development of three industrial buildings (D.R. 84-02) located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 8th Street. Lincoln Properties Canpany, developer of D.R. 84-02, in order to fulfill the construction req:: irements as stipulated in the Pipeline License, has submitted an agreement which is also attached for approval. RECDMENDATIDN It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Pipeline License between the City and the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Res ectfully sub /~tt1;e/d~f,~ d J~;~~' -~-Y G17 • AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 198 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a Municipal corporation, hereinafter "City" and Lincoln Property Company hereinafter "Developer", provides as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, there is attached hereto: (1) Exhibit "A" a proposed Pipeline License, hereinafter "Contract", between the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, hereinafter "Railroad" and the City for the • construction of two (2) pipelines, 30" and 36" in diameter (hereinafter, whether one or more pipelines, called the "Pipeline"), across or along the right of way of Licensor at or near the Station of Rochester, County of San Bernardino, State of California, the exact location of the Pipeline being more particularly shown upon the print hereto attached, No. 1-02962, dated November 15, 1984, marked "Exhibit A" and made apart hereof. WHEREAS, Developer desires that said PIPELINE be built to facilitate development of his project. NHEREAS, City is willing to enter into the Contract only if Developer pays all casts of constructing the Pipeline and agrees to in all respects, assume and perform the obligations of the City under the Contract; and, WHEREAS, Developer is willing to do the same. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Developer agree as follows: (1) City shall execute and deliver to Railroad the Contract. -1- G9 (2) Within fifteen (15) days after written demand by City, Developer shall deposit with City the sum of E250.00 as a security for the payment of Compensation for the license. (3) Developer shall construct said Pipeline and in so doing shall in all respects comply with all terms and conditions of the Contract. Developer shall pay, without limitation, all costs of constructing the Pipeline. (4) Developer shall require that each contractor of Developer engaged far the purpose of constructing the Pipeline, execute and comply with all "contractor's agreements" which are required by the Railroad, as well as comply with all terms and provisions fo the Contract. (5) Developer shall insure that each contractor engaged by Developer for the construction of the Pipeline, or any part thereof, has the City named as an additional insured on each policy of insurance that the contractor is • required to furnish pursuant to the terms of the Contract or Indenture. (6) Developer agrees to indemnify City from and against all costs, expense, claims and liabilities for injury to or death of persons (including, but not limited to, passengers and employees of Railroad and emp loyee5 of City), and damage to or loss of property (including, but not limited to, property owned, leased, occupied or used by or in the care, custody or control of Railroad or the employees of Railroad or City or the employees of City), however, same may be caused, resulting from arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement or the construction of the aforesaid undersigned project, whether or not caused or contributed to by any negligent act or omission on the part of any of City's agents or employees. _Z_ • 70 • (8) Should either party bring suit to compel performance of this Agreement or to recover for breach of any covenant or condition contained herein, the prevailing party shall pay reasonable attorneys fees in addition to the amount of judgment and costs. (g) Time is of the essence of this Agreement. (10) This Agreement may be modified or amended only by an instrument in writing executed by both parties. (11) This Agreement shall 6e binding and shall inure to the benefit of sucres sors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY ATTEST BY: ity erk -3- SY: BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Mayor ADProved as to Form: ity Attorney 7~ Santa Fe OriQNlal uoouls-zs PIPELINE LICENSE TNIS LICENSE, Made Chia 1st day of December 1984, between THE ATCNISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA PE EAILWAY COMPANY, a De leware corporation (hereinafter called "Licensor"), party of the firs[ part, and CITY OF BANCRO CUCAMONCA, a municipality in the Sta to of California (hereinafter, whether one or more, called "Licensee"), party of the second par[. WITNESSETN, That the parties hereto for the considerations hereinafter expressed covenant and agree as follows: 1. Subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Licensor lfcenaee Licensee co construct and maintain two (2) pipelines, 30" and 36" in diameter (here inaf[er, whether one or more pipelines, called the "PIPELINE"), ac roes or along • the right of way of Licensor et or near [he Station of Rochester, County of San Bernardino, State of California, the exact location of the PIPELINE being more pareiculerly shown upon the print hereto attached, No. 1-02962, dated November 15, 1984, marked "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof. 2. Licensee shall use the PIPELINE solely for carrying storm wager and shall not use it co carry any ocher commodity or for any other purpose whatsoever. 3. Licensee shall pay Licensor as compensation for Chia License the sum of Two Hundred Fifty and No/l00 Dollars (6250.00). 4. Licensee shall, at its own cos[ and subject to the supervision and control of Licensor's Asa istent General Manager-Engineering, locate, construct and maintain the PIPELINE in such a manner and of ouch material Ghat it will no[ e[ any time be a source of danger to or interference with the present or Future [racks, roadbed and property of Licensor, or the safe operation of its railroad. In caeea where Che Licensee is pemitced under Section 2 hereof [o use the PIPELINE for ail. ass. cuaca a eu anu uwrea uer Asa mcarnea rn con[o[mtty with the plans and specifications shown on print hereto attached in such caeea, marked "Exhibit B" and made a part hereof. If at any aims Licensee shall, in she j udgmen[ of Licensor, fail to perform properly its obligations under this Section, Licensor may, at its option, itself perform such work as it deems necessary for [he safe ope raeion of its railroad, and in such event Licensee agrees to pay, within fifteen (15) days after bill shall have been rendered therefor, Che coat so incurred by Licensor, bus failure on the part cf Licensor to perform the obligations of Licensee sha 11 not release Licensee from liability hereunder for lose or damage occasioned thereby. Rev. 9/82 (1658/CD64a/M91) -1- ~~ 5. Licensee shall reimhurse Licensor Eor any expense incurred by Licensor for falsework to support Licensor's tracks and for flagman co protect its [ref tic during installation of [he PIPELINE and for any and all other expense incurred by Licensor on account of the PIPELINE. 6. Licensee shall a[ all times indemnify and save harmless Licensor against and pay in full all loss, damage or expense chat Licensor may sustain, incur or become liable £or, result irg in any manner from Che cone [ruction, maintenance, use, state of repair, or presence of the PIPELINE, ioc lud iog any such loss, damage or expense arising out of (a) Loss of or damage to property, (b) injury to or death of persons, (c) mechanics' or other liens of any character, or (d) taxes or asaeasmenes of any kind. 7. If z[ any time Licensee shall Fail or refuse [o comply with or carry out any of Che covenants herein contained Licensor may at its election forthwith revoke this License. 8. THIS LICENSE is given by Licensor and accepted by Licensee upon the express condition [hoe the same may be terminated at any time by either party upon ninety (90) days' notice in writing to be served upon the other party, stating eherein the date that such termination shall Cake place, and [hat upon [he termination of this License in [hie or any other manner herein provided, Licensee, upon demand of Licensor, shell ebaadon the use of [he PIPELINE end remove the sao~ end restore the right of way and tracks of Licensor to the same cond is ion in whit they were prior ca the placing of [he PIPELIYE thereunder. In case Licensee shall fail co restore Licensor's premises as aforesaid within ten (10) days after [he effective date of termination, Li~eneor may proceed with such work et the expense of Licensee. No termination hereof shall release Licensee from any liability or obligation hereunder, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any ac ta, omissions or events happening prior to the date the PIPELINE is removed and [he right of way and Crack of Licensor restored ae above provided. 9. In the case of the eviction of Licensee by anyone owning or obtaining title to the premises on which the PIPELINE ie located, oz the ea le or abandonment by Licensor of said premises, Licensor shall not be liable to Licensee for any damage of any nature whatsoever ar to refund any payment nwde by Licennee Co Licensor hereunder, except the proportionate part of any recurring rental charge which auy have been paid hereunder in advance. 10. All notices co be given hereunder shall be given in wr icing, by depositing same in the United States mail duty registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the Licensee ar Licensor as the case o~ay be at the address shown on the signature page hereof, or add reseed to such other address as [he parties hereto may from time to time designate. 11. In [he even[ [hat two or more parties execute ch is Ins [rumens ea Licensee, all [he covenantn and agreements of Licensee in [hie License shall be the joint end several covenants and agreements of ouch parties. • Rev. 9/82 (1658/C064s/H91) -2- rI 3 12. All the covenants and provisions of this Instrument shall be binding upon and inure [o the benefit of [he successors, legal representatives and assigns of the parties to the same extent and eFfect'as [he same are binding upon and inure to [he benefit of [he parties hereto, but no ass ignmen[ hereof by Licensee, its successors, legal representatives or assigns, or any subsequent assignee, shall be binding upon Licensor without the written consent of Licensor in each instance. 13. Notwithstanding any other provisions of [his License, Licensee shall comply with all statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders and decisions (here inaFter referred to as "Standards"), issued by any federal, state or local governmental body or agency established thereby (hereinafter referred to as "Au[hori[yn), relating to Licensee's use of Licenser's property hereunder. In its use of the premises, Licensee shall a[ all times be in Eull compliance with all Standards, present or future, set by any Authority, including, but not limited to, Standards concerning air quality, water quality, noise, hazardous substances and hazardous waste. In [he even[ Licensee fails to be in full compliance with Standards set by any Authority, Licensor may, after giving reasonable notice of the failure [o Licensee, and Licensee, within thirty (30) days of such notice, fails either [o corret[ such noncompliance or to give written notice to the Licensor of its intent [o contest the allegation of noncompliance before the Authority eatabl fishing the Standard or in any other proper forum, Cake vhatever ac [ion is necessary to protect Che premises and Licensoe's railroad and other adjacent property. Licensee shall reimburse [he • Licensor for all coats (including but not limited to, consulting, engineering, clean-up and disposal coats, and legal costs) incurred by the Licensor in complying with such Standards, and also such coats incurred by the Licensor in abating a violation of such Standards, protecting ago ins[ a threatened violation aF such S [andards, defending any claim of violation of such Standards in any proceeding before any Au chori Cy or court, and paying any fines or penalties imposed for such v io latia ns. Licensee shall assume liability for and shall save and hold harmless the Licensor from any claim of a violation of such Standards regard leas of the nature thereof or the Au [horny or person asserting such claim, which results from Licensee's use of Licenaor'e premises, except [hose claims which arise in whale or in par[ from the negligence of Licensor. Licensee, at ice cost, shell assume Che defense of all such claims regardless of whether they are asserted against Licensee or Licensor. 14. In cases where Licensee fie permitted under Section 2 hereof to use the PIPELINE for nonfla®eble substances, Che PIPELINE shall be cone [rutted, installed and thereafter maintained fir, conformity with plans and specifications set forth in the American Railway Engineering Association, Specification Eor Pipeline Crossings Under Railway Track for Non-flammable Subs [antes, Revised 1964, or Spec if icetion for the Placement of Concrete Culvert Pipe, Revised 1966, whichever may apply. l5. Any work performed on Licensor's right of uay by Licensee or Licensee's contractor shall be done in a satiefac eary workmanlike manner end in accordance with plans and a pecif ica[ions approved by Licensor, including plans covering any fe laework, bracing or cribbing [hat may be necessary Co use uve r, under or adjacent: Co Licensoe's track, and no work shall be permitted until said plane and spec ificationa have been approved by Licensor. Rev. 9/82 (1658/CD64a/M91) -3- 'ly 16. Licensee or Licensee's contractor shall no[ 6e permit red Co commence work on said Licenso is right of way without having firs[ received written no[ificat ion from Licenser's Division Superintendent of permission [o proceed. 17. Any contractor or subcontractor performing work on or in connection with Che PIPELINE shall for the purpose o£ this Agreement, and particularly for the purposes of Sec [ion 6 of this Agreement, be conclusively deemed to be the servant and agent of Licensee acting on behalf and within the scope of such contractor's or subcontractor's employment for Licensee. 18. Licensee agrees to furnish and keep in force or arrange to have furnished and keep in force insurance of all kinds and amounts specified below during the initial ce rm of construction of the PIPELINE and during any subsequent term or terms during which maintenance is performed on the PIPELINE. (a) Licensee shall, with respect to the operations which i[ performs upon, beneath or adjacent [o Licenaor's right of way end/or [rack, furnish or arrange to have furnished (i) regular Contractors' Public Liability Insurance with limits cE not less than Five Nundred Thousand Dollars (SS00,000) far all liabil icy arising out of bodily injuries [o or death of one person and, subject to [ha[ limit for each person, One Million Dollera (51,000,000) for all liability arising out of bodily injuries Co or death of two or more persons in one acc idcn[ or occurrence; and (ii) regular Contractors' Property Damage Liability. Insurance wi [h limits of not leas than One Million Dollars (51,000,000) far each occurrence Eor all liability arising out of damage to or lose ar destruction of property. Licensee and all iCS contractors and subcontractors shall be named insureds either in a single policy of insurance complying with the requirements o£ Chis Subsec [ion (a1 or in separate polic iea maintained during such periods ae such contractors and/or eubcon[rac tore shall perform any cork hereunder. The policy or policies insuring Licensee shall insure Licensee's contractual liability in favor of Liceneor contained in Saceion 6 of this License. (b) Licensee shall, with respect to Che opera[ ions it or any of its contra<[ors or subcontractors perform upon, beneath or adjacent to Liceneor'e right of way and/or crack, furnish or arrange to have furnished in Licenser's favor (i) policy or policies of insurance satisfactory to Licensor which shell protect Licensor against liability foz injuries Co or death of person or persona, INCLUDING LICENSOR'S EMPLOYES, occasioned by or resulting, in whole or in par[, from she operations of tiaensee or any of its aubcantrac Cora, on or contiguous Ca Lic enaor'a property (except liability due solely [o Licenaor's negligence), with limits of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (5500,000) For all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of one person and, subject to such limitation, One Million Dollars (:1,000,000) for alt damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more pe coons in any one accident or occurrence; and (ii) policy or pal is iea of insurance satisfactory to Licensor which will protect Liceneor against liability for damage to or loos or des [ruction of property, inr.lud ing property in Licensar'e care, custody or • control, occasioned by or resu tong, is whole or in pare, from the operations Rev. 9/82 (1658/CD64a/M91) -4- .. u of Licensee, its contractors or subcontrac [ors (except liability due sc le ly Co Liceosor's negligence) with limits of no[ less than One Million Dollars (51,000,000) for each occurrence. 19. Licensee agrees [O furnish or arrange [o have furnished tc Licensor cerCiEic ales reflecting the insurance coverage or certified copy of insurance policy, iE requested 6y :icensor, as required by Subaec eion (a) of Section 18 hereof, and to furnish, or arrange to have furnished, the original policy required by Subsection (b) of Section 18. Cer[i Eica[es reflecting [he coverage required by Subsection (a) shall unqualifiedly require thirty (30) days' written notice to Licensor of cancellation or modification o£ tha insurance referred Co in such certificates. 20. Licensee shall not be permitted to exercise the license and permiaeion granted hereunder until notified by Licensor that insurance Furnished pursuant to Section 18 hereof is se[isfac COry. IN NITNESS NNEREOP, the parties have executed Chia License, in duplicate, the day and year first above written. THE ATCNISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA PB RAILNAY COMPANY One Santa Pe Plera • 5200 E. Sheila Street Loa Mgelea, CA 90040 Br O~c- Its Manayer of ontraccs CITY OP RANCNO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917]0 Ite Lrcenaee • 33944tH Mv. 9/82 (1658/CD64a/M91) -S- ~„ EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON ~~y„~~,~ CHICAGO, ILLINOIS - y' ~~~ ~~~ --- SCALE' 1 INTO 100 FT, CHIEF ENGINEER LOS ANfii=[-e~ DIY DESCRIPTION APPROVED S~coND DIST. DATE ' /~/pVC-MDe'R /5, /98~ -N- v01'e : I L'RV Bolo SJack o~/~-Y_ =~-f.R~/5-F//(o 2.75 '~ -- _ g9 1~R = _~ ~_ jp Los ANGG-LGS =.5. ~L+2y ,~ / •`~ I // ~' $LLY ~ ,e ~~ ~ J ~~ Ise' 0 __ _ ~~~__ 50' ~/C SAN ~C^7ZNARDfNO-~ DESCRIPTION OF PIPELINE UNDER tRACK PIPE LINE LOCATED AS SHOWN BASE OF RAIL PIPE ' CARRIES PRESSURE 912E KIND TNICKNE89 LENOTN TO TOP OF P P CcASSY-~7-D i CARRIER ~i~sA~N CllAViT"( °yL_" Rc.P. ,(~~ 77' S_5 Gtt.:-s~3wo-~ S.Q, 30" R.c.7 7 rz'7 UrzAV~r/ 3_5 50' ,QT RocNLS'ttizz,SAN ~="RN~RD/NO C.E. DRAWING NO. t -O296Z Coc/N7 Y, CAL I~-oRNIA _~; DIV. FILE NO. O.M. FILE NO.//~Z//S"=rC.E. fllE NO. V. DWG. NO. r.n ~A • RESOLUTION N0. EO;:-}6-A7R 85 -~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY FOR 'THE INSTALLATION OF A STORM DRAIN PIPE BENEATH THE RAILROAD TRACKS WHEREAS, a storm drain pipe is required to be installed beneath the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway tracks near the Station of Rochester, County of San Bernardino, State of California for project, D.R. 84-02; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California has for its consideration a Pipeline License between the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and the City for the right to install the storm drain pipe at the above location. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Pipeline License be and the same is hereby approved by the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign same on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROYEO, and ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 1985. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: on a s, zyor ATTEST: Bever y A. Aut a et, ity er jaa u -v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 10, 1985 t-i ~aS U Q~~~~ To: City Council and City Manager 19ii Flom: Dick Mayer, perk project Coordinator Subject: Approval of Conceptual Plan and Negative Declaration for Red Hill Community Park (Consent Calendar - January 16, 1965) Item '0' r 1 L J n L J BACKGROUND: Ateach ed is the conceptual plan far the Red Hill Comnuni ty Park. with the asaiatance of a 16 meaber design task force with, varying recreational interee ta, the 44.6 acre park ai to has been designed to include a large athletic area with 6 night lighted sports fields (including a upgrade of the existing Little League field), individual a~ group picnicking foci li lice, an outdoor anphi theatre, a 1.2 acre lake and water fea cure, horseshoe end chuff lehoard courts, 3 children's play eppera tue arses, a joggi nq/exercise trail, cenceesion and reetroon buildings and parking for approximately 350 vehie lea. The perk site plan has been reviewed by the Park Dave lopmenG and Planning Commission whe recommend that the Ci [y Council review and approve the plan. A Negative Declaration indicating the project will have no significant effect upon the environment ie also attached Eor City Council approval. That the City Council approve the conceptual deve loparent plan and negative declaration far the Red H111 Community Park Project. attachment 79 n U n u REO HILL COMMUNITY PARK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEGATIVE DECLARATI~I i. Brief Description of Project: Development of a 44.6 acre park site to include 6 night lighted fields, children's play areas, group 6 individual picnic areas, an outdoor amphitheatre, a 1-2 acre take and water feature, horseshoe pits, shuffleboard courts, parking for 350 cars, re streom/concession buildings & landscaping, 2. Name and Address of Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1910, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required. 4. Minutes of such decision and the Initial Study prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are on file in the City Clerk's Office o£ the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. This decision may be appealed tc the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A written appeal and filing fee must be received by the City Clerk's Office no later than 5:00 p.m., fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the City Council's decision. 6. This Negative Declaration is subject to the implementaticn of mitigating measures (if any) as listed on the attachments. DATED itle i ~, .; .. •. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STDDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMAiIGF SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Cotm<ittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part ZI of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (101 days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee sill make one of three ~'eterminations: 1) The project sill have no signi- ficont environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impaot Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. • PROJECT TITLE: g1°•D kILL (,pAAMUNfTY f'~R~K- D5VfR.L~VF4l°1JT APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: RIG}NCI RAA~-, G'(Y pP RpNGN( LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL N0.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONALr STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: ~IILf7~A1G G [.R.aegt~lG PERMITS . I-1 21 r ~. • Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO • I-2 9 ? ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY:Ft~F~-fddr~YaaeF~(~?1.AE5.5Qy~)~l6 DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTIOY OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND 2HEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): • WILL THIS PROSECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground • contours. 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? ~( 3. Create a substantial change in demand for - municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? ~( 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many?15^~ X 6. Create the need foz use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flaasnables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: GEE ~TTl~Ci'°^ I6IPORTANT: zesidentialeunits ,~ocomplete thesfozm~onnthe next page. N~/~ CERT IF iC,1T ION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that ehe facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knew ledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made 6y the Development Review Comanittee. Date I ~i}/$~} Signature /--" r~ "' ~- - ' Title Llav eo iurr rmab(ti;A7DR • I-3 Explanation of yea answers to Part r of Initial Study 111 The pr ~j e::t will create a sub6 tanti al change in ground contours over those of the exis ling Bite. In order to obtain adequate level area for Ghe ba llf ie ld areas, earth movl ng will be necessary to create suitable playing surfaces. Any slope cone traction required will be cone [rutted to City standards. The berm at the south boundary of the site will be removed and the earth used elsewhere on the site. The site grading work will be a balanced cut and Eill process wi [h very little (if any) need for soil import or export to Ne ai te. AS 9ecause of the gradi ng effort, approximately ten trees in Ue Deain will be removed to accwmodete the sports field areas. Additionally, five to ten trees will he reswved to enable the construction of the northernmost parking lot in the exietlnq park area. The remaining site trees will be protected [o the greatest extent possible. F.xtenalve tree plantings are proposed wi Uin the park whicA will more than offset the trees Ua[ will ne removed. • ~J DATE: CITY OF &VVCHO CUCAMONCA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APPLICA.`1T: G'[`/ OF f ~-LI(~Cd~B~I~"p` FILL`IC DATE: ~.JIA LOC NUFD3ER: IJ~h. PROSECT:y~ Ill ~a1 L11"N ~~ ~J,(~,pppA~.`P PROSECT LOCATION: ~~~~~~~ L. ENVIRO)^O:NTAL I:ffACTS (Exp lanacion of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on etc ached sheeCS). YES ltAti EE NO 1. So its and Geo logY• N111 the proposal have . Sign if icanC iesulCS in: a. L'nsta6le ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? _. ~ b. Disruptions, dieolacements, compaction or burial of the soil _._ h c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? ._ d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? __ .~ e. Any potential increase in uind or water erosion of soils, off ec [Sng either on or off site conditons? -- ~' f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? __ X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as ear [hquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or simile[ hazards? _ __ g h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any minecal resource? _ _~ 2. tlyd roloay. N111 the proposal have sign!.f Scant resul[a in: :'.~ a. Changes in currents, or [he course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorp cion races, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runofF? c. Alterations [e the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge Snto surface waters, of any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, oz through interference with an aquifer? Qual icy? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water suppLles? i. Exposure of people or property [o water related hazards such as flooding or seic;te s? J. Air Quality. Nill Che proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions From mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Decetiorat ion of ambient air quality and/or intetference with the attainment of applicable air quali cy standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Blaca Flora. IJ111 the proposal have significant results Sn: YES MAYBE NO K • X X -~ _ X • X _- X Y ~_ ~ x a. Change in the charac eerl sties of species, • including diversiey, diser ibution, ar number of any species aF planes? _ ,__ fC 6. ReducClon of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of planesY _ ~_ ,~ 87 1 ' YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of nev or disruptive species of ~ `-_ plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural x production? '- Fauna. '+'i11 the proposal have significant results Sn: a. C;;^,ange in the characteristics of species, including diversity, dis Cr ibuc ion, or numbers x of any species of animals? -- b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, raze x or endangered species of aniaa ls? Intreductien of new or disruptive species aE t . aniaals into an area, or result in a bar: ter x to tie mig:aticn or movement of aniaals? ,_ _._ ._- d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or x ca ildlife hob ita c? -' -- "- j, po nul aticn, Wi11 the propcsal have sign if icanc T25Uits 1R: a. :i i11 [te proposal alter the Location, dicta- f • but.or., density, diversity, or grav th cat=_ o X -' r~ne human population of an area? Wi11 the proposal affecC ex is cing hous i;.;, or 6 X . trea ce a demand for addi cional housing'. - - 6. Soc io-Economic Factors. Will the proposal. have s i3niEitanc results in: a. Change in local or regional sotto-economic characteris tics, including economic or corce rtial diversity, tax race, and property - ~ ~ values? -- b, 'dill project costs be equitably distributed among pro;ecc beneficiaries, i. e., buyers, tax payers or prof ec[ users? -- - - ). 4and 'Lse and Plann ine Considerations, Wi12 the proaosai have significant resuLis in? A substantial alteration of the present or ~ a. planned land use of an area? --- '-' A wnf lLct with any designations, objectives, 6 . policies, or adop ced plans of any governmental ~ - entities? - An impact upon [he qulaicy or quantity of c . existing consumptive or non-consumptlve ¢ recteaclonal opportun Sties? - ~ ~3 ' loge , YES >ipyEE NO 8. Transoorra [ion. hill the proposal have significant res ults ;n: . a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movemenC? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new scree[ construction? ~ c. Ef Leers on eats Ling parking facilities, or demand for new parking? ~ d. Subsean[ial impact upon exis cfng transporta- tion systems? e. Al teracions Co present pae[erns o[ circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? ~( f. dlterations co or effects on present and pocen vial water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic'. ~ g. Increases in [toff is hazards Cn motor vehicles, b ic;:clises or pedestrians? ~ 9. Cul tural Resources. Wi11 the proposal have sig nificant resin CS in: • a. A disturbance co the integrit}' of archaea logic al, paleontological, and/or historical resources? ~ 10. F?ea lth, Saf etv, and Vu isance Factors, Will the pro posal have significant resin es in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? % b. Ep osure of people to potential health hazards'. X c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous s ubscances in the even[ of an acciden c? X d. An increase in [he number of individuals or species of vector or pacheno gen is organisms oz the exposure of people [o such organisms? ~ e. Increase in exiscing noise Levels? ~ E. Exposu ce of peap le Ca potentially dangecous noise Levels? ~ g. The creation of objectionable odors? __ X S h. An increase in light or glare? ~ ~° 1' ~ _ ~ YES MAYDE NO 11. Aes thecics. Will the proposal have significant • results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? .~ b. The treat ion of axr aes chetically offensive s ice? X c. A conflice wi Ch the ohj ec true of designated or potential scenic corridors? iC 12. ^tili ties and Public Services. Will [he proposal have a signif icanc need for new systems, or al tera[ions to the following: a. Electric power? % b. d'acural or packaged gas? ?~ c. Conmunicatians systems? x d. Water supply? X e. Waste•.~a ter facilities? % • f. Flood control structures? r g. Solid waste facilities? ,_ x h. Fire protection'. x i. Poiice protection? k j. Schools? N k. Packs or other recreational facilities? li 1. ita in tenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? __ ~ m. Ocher governmental services? f 1J. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. L'se of suhstantial or excessive fuel or energy? __ X b. Sufis cane SaL increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? _~ ~. c. An increase in the demand for development of - new sources of energy? ~ 1r d. An increase or perpetuation of ehe consume cion of non-renewab Le forms cf energy, when feasible renewable eourcea of energy ace available? ~, cr Page .6 YES :NAY9E NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or • scarce natural resource? X 14. ~tandacorv Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the poten cial to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the hah itat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plane or animal con®unicy, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plan[ or animal or elimina ce important examples of the major periods of California his Cory or prehis COry? X b. noes the project have the potential to achieve short-term, co the disadvantage of long-term, environmen [al goals? (A shot[-term Smpact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the Future). ~ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but Cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental of fects of an • individual pcoj ect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past proj ec cs, and probable future proj eccs). _ ?~ d. Does the project have environmental effec cs which will cause substantial adverse effec [s on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X II. DISCUSSIO)1 OF ENVIRONNE\TAL EVALUATION (i, e., of aEf izma Give answers to thz above ques [ions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). SB6 A?II~-NtU • IIZ. DETER1fINATION • On the basis of this initial evaluation: ^ I find the proposed project CODLD NOT have a aignif icant effect ?( on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATI0;1 will be prepared. I Find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant eifec[ I-: in [his case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. ^ I find the proposed proj ec« N_4Y have a significant eff etc on the envir:unent, and an ENVIROh^".ENT I:IPACT REPORT is required. Page 7 Dale ~'~ 4-s$ --V Y' ~_ Signature rk Pfau cf (~id~~~ -~ Title ? 1 E~x lanation to yes and maybe answers to Part II Initial Study Transportation The park will generate additional vehicular movement because of the types of facilities proposed at the park. The traffic movement will 6e primarily connected to the activities occurring at the park, such as ballgamee or amphitheatre even to and will likely be sporadic in nature. Weekend traffic flow will be more constant, especially during the summer months when family 6 group picnicking is popular. This traffic movement will he controlled by the signalised intersection at Baseline Aoad and Vineyard Avenue and the stra tegic location of the parking lot areas planned for the park. These parking areas will work to disperse the traffic load more evenly throughout the park and on the ad}scent street areas. Therefore, no significant impact is anticipated. b. The project development will include the widening of Vineyard Street to current City standards thereby minimizing any impacts to the existing streets in the area. Therefore no significant impact is expected. c. The facilities will generate the need far approximately 350 pa rk inq • spaces during peak periods. These spaces have been designed into the plan. Therefore no significant impact is anticipated. • ~3 n u v. n ~ wrn rrn nr rn ~ vnvn . • • L STAFF REPORT ~p~~~~~' 'C 9 f C ii i ~ DATE: January 16, 1985 : ~ ', ;j F Q I D T0: Mayor and Nembe re of City Council _ 19J7 FROM: Lauren N. Wasserman, Ci[y Manager SUBJECT: SOUTHERN CALIPORNIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE FILM CENTER ', __ It is recommended that the Ci[y Council parricipa Ce in Che Southern California Public-Pr iva[e Film Center. Thin organisation was created by [he Southern California Aa eociation of Governments in an effort [o make certain telev ieion and motion picture filming is encouraged within the State of California, rather than other eta tee. The film industry comer ilea an important part of the Southern California economy and every effort should be made [o encourage the film industry and the Cel ev ie ion industry to produce in our State, rather than io other loco tione. The primary aerv ice to local governments which will be provided by the Public-Private Film Center ie [o atreaml ins [he permit protese for the film production industry xithout lose of local control. The Center will act ae an agent far local governments and will xri[e perm i[ papers. Each city does have [he final say before a permit ie authorized. While Rancho Cucamonga hoe not had a greet deal of film activity in recent years, we are contacted from time [o time when a film company wishes [o use our Ci[y ae a backdrop for a motion picture or felev ie ion program. There rill be no charge [o the City for the Eiret nix months of pe r[ic ipa tion in the Center. After that time it ie ant is ipa tad Cha[ the Center will be financed through a self-sustaining Eee etruceur e. Prior to a final decision with respect to membership, staff rill report back to [he City Council. RECOMMENDATION It ie recon®ended [hat [he City of Rancho Cucamonga par[ic ipa to in the Southern California Publ i<-Private Film ae~t or for a six-month period. A Re eo lotion indicating desire to join the Center is attached for the City Council's consideration. Re ape ctfully subm i[[ed, Lauren M. Waeeermen City Manager LMW/kep gs FuL : fore,,,, (uasse.~,,.a.._ • Iz///ea INFORMATION ON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE FILM CENTER Hhat is the Southern California Public-Private Film Center? The City of Los Angeles, Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, the State of California and SCAG have provided funds and planning to curb runaway film production. The statewide annual revenue loss in 1983 was E1.6 billion. One way to keep the industry here is to reduce obstacles to production. The Southern California Public-Private Film Center will provide a variety . of services to local governments and the film production industry to streamline the permit process without any loss of locai control. The Center will act as an agent for local governments and write the permit papers in the Center. But during the entire negotiating process, the city will have final say before the permit is authorized. There will be no charge to local governments for the first six months of participating in the Center. After the first six months, the goal is to make the Center self-sustaining through the fee structure. An immediate goal is to get the Center up and running by mid-January 1985 with as many cities and counties in the SCAG region participating as possible. /J I Ilhat hill Your Local Government bet By Particioatina7 There are a number of services the Film Center will provide immediately, and others will be developed during the first six months of operation. Upon joining the Film Center, a member government can expect the Center to: o Act as a permit agent in a central location -- ail rights to negotiate remain at the local level. We, in essence, glue your jurisdiction a presence in Hollywood and greater accessibility to the industry. o Collect fees and provide accounting services far participating local governments. o Provide negotiation and mediation services. o Provide a hotline for neighborhood complafnts. o Develop and update a directory of SCAG region location-filming require- ments for reference and comparison. o Help local governments develop flexible ordinances and fee schedules. o Act as a vehicle for developing an industry code of ethics and policing process. o Cooperate with the California Motion Picture Council to develop a comprehensive location site photo library. u • 97 2 How Does Yaur City/County JoinT The SCAG Joint Powers Agreement provides the legal umbrella to create the Center. There are two steps to joining. First, the passage of a resolution by your City Council/Board of Supervisors approving membership. A sample resolution is attached. Second, a Memorandum of Understanding between your City/County and SCAG will detail specific agreements, respon- sibilities, and limits of liability. How Do I Bet More InforeationT If you would like more information; or would like to discuss concerns or • share ideas, please call Cathryn Hilliard at (213) 385-1000. We urge you to support and join the Center as a way to benefit your City County and preserve the economic benefits to the region provided by the film production industry. Your jurisdiction gets mare than the permit fee in revenue. Some examples of income to local governments are also attached. n ~~ 3 RESOLOTION NO. 85-~/ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COURCIL OP 171E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 1H;MBERSRIP TO TlIE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE FILM CENTER WHEREAS, Che motion picture and television film production industry ie the se cand largest service industry in Southern California, generating $1 .6 billion in economic activity and employing 77,000 workers not including support services; and NHEREAS, [he industry ie being lured out of the region and State by 65 gover:menc-funded out-of-eta to film commies ions; and WHEREAS, the industry rould be more likely to stay in the region if the location filming permit proce sa could be e[reamlined through the cooperative etfor to of individual local governments for the financial benefit of the region; end i7HEBEAS, local governments moat retain the right to protect cone[ituents' rights and safety; and • WHEREAS, there are issues of mutual concern to local governments and the industry related [o location filming; and WHEREAS, the Governor, the Legislature, [he Mayor of the City of Loe Angeles, the Alliance of Motion Picture end Television Produce re, the Southern California Aa sociation of Govermente (SCAG), and [hie City of Rancho Cucamonga recognize the economic impact of [he industry in Chia region; and WHEREAS, the Legicl store hoe created [he Southern California Public-Private Film Commission as a region 1, one-atop, loco [ion filming permit center pilot prof ec[, to be operated by SCAG for the participating cities end count iea in the region, for the purpose ot: A. Streaml ioing the permit process, B. Protect isg [he rights of local gover~enta to negotia to directly with the industry. C. Assisting local govez~ente in geoe rating additional revenue through the permit proces e. D. Saving local governments [he co et of additioml et eff and office apace by allw ing the Center co act ea permit-writing agent. E. Providing a forum Co addreu is wee of mutual concern to local governments and the industry (i.e., accountabilitq, industry code of conduct, goverment flexibility). v9 P. Demonatrat ing through its operation the fumct Tonal value . of a regional one-atop permit center; and vRPCaac the City of Rancho Cucamonga can participate in the Center for the fire[ aii months at no direct coat. NDN, TBEREFDRB, BE IT RESOLVED that Che City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga supports the formation and goals of [he 9ou[hern California Public-Private Pilm Commis aion one-aeon permit center. Be IT FIIRTRBR RE90LVED that [he City Council of the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga expresses its support of the motion picture and telev ieion industry ae a major contributor to the econom ice of this region, and author izee the City to participate in Che Center xhen it ie eatabliahed. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of Saauary, 1985. AYE3: NOES: ABSENT: Joo D. Mikela, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Au[helet, City Clerk u C , J /~ O • u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 6. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kr al 1, Engineer Technician 2[~ 7 / , rC l z ., > 19]; SUBJECT: Ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 20 to Landscape Mai nt en ante District No. 1 for Tract Nos. 12523, 11577 and Parcel Map 7827 Attached, for City Council approval, is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 20 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for the above subject projects. The developers have been sent letters notifying them of the public hearing and the resolution of intent has been published in the Daily Report newspaper giving time and date of the public hearing. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report which was tentatively approved 6y Resolution No. 84-325 on December 19, 1984. RECOMMENDATION It is reconmended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the subject annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. LBH lBIC:ko Attachments /U% Calmark Development Corporation ~ ~ ,m.....rr S eotember 7, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P.O. Bo:c 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Rick Gomez Re: Parcel D1ap 7827 Dear Nr. Gomez: This letter will advise you that Calmark Development intends to join into the landscape and lighting maintenance districts of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Sin e~y;~ ~/~ .7 im McIntire Vice President Engineering JG1/le 2121 Cloverlield 91VQ, 9pita 202, P.O. Box 2128. Santa Monica, Ca6lornia 90108 (213) 1534179 ~J 1 L1ne ~ r~ssocistes a 902 meet ninth ;m~a uPlanJ, ;.i li(. 91i.'G i 1i~991 3uC? • October 25, 1934 City of Rancho Cu ca conga Public 1lorks De pa rtrent 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Lloyd Nu bbs, City ;ngineer Re: Tract 1'.577 As land owners of Tract 11577 we hereby agree to annex to the Landscape and Street Lighting District. • Very Lruly yours, Lane & Asscc~ia tes j n ~lj Terrance A. Lane Owner ds JN: 79-17 • . civil engineers land planners designers surveyors /a 3 • \}, ,Y ~s~ ~ r+'~' ~' '•z':~ Octpb er 25, 7924 LIGHTNER DEVELOPbtENT .St CONTRACTING City of Rancho Cuc a:ro nga c/o .;ohn .:arti r., Engineering 9320 C 3aszline Road Ranch; Cuc anm n;a, GA 91730 Re: Tract =12523 Gentlemen: We are rea~zs ti r.g [hat the above Tract =12523, located just zast of Archibald, north side :;r Lair an Avenue, be added to tha Landscape and Lighting Maintenancz Oistri ct. Rzspzctfully, L'I GHT~`E~d OE'/ELO?:•lE9T ~ i~/ ~/ GEORGE H. LiGnT.'lER G:;./sg cc: Dan Guerra, Gi vi1 Engineer 1M3 Wnl Foomin Bomwua . Swle 6 • upuna, Calilorno 9086 • pUl y~E.=911 Conv. 4e. No. l1Ni!! /DY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION N0. 20 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 12523, Tract No. 11571 and Parcel Map 7827 SELTIC'1 !. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Lhapter 1, Division 15 of tl~e Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Coun^_il has elected to annex all new tracts into landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract No. 12523, Tract No. 11517 and Parcel Map 7827 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed maps are shown on the Maps as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer and have heen approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract No. 12523, Tract No. 11577 and Parcel Map 7821. The plans and specifications far the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject Maps and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No casts will he incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cast data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 20 comprised of 11,136 square feet pf landscaped area) is shown: ~ J i Total Annual Maintenance Cost • 5,30 K 515,873 square feet = 3154,161.90 Per Lot Annual Assessment 154,761.90 divided by 3730 units = 3 41.49 (yearly) Per Lot 1lanthly Assessment $41.49 divided by 12 - 5 3.46 (monthly) Assessment shall apply to each iot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will Se maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner maintenance. SECTION 5. Assessment Oiaar am A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to Chis report and iabeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTIOi! 6. Assessment • Improvement for Annexation No. 20 is found Lo be of general hen efit to all lots '.vi thin the District and that assessment shall he equal for each parcel. The City Councii will hold a public hearing in June, 1985 to determine the actual assessments based uDOn the actual casts incurred by the City during the 1962/63 fiscai year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by [he Landscape and Lighting Act of 1912. SECTION 7, Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preiiminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. Lity Council adapts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or ahandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in Siay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and • approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. /o~ ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 20 -: • =:•~ ,! : ~>' ~:, i ~. 'i 4.i Irt / ~~ _ ~~{ % ^ ~ N: 1 / f• ~~. ; ~ti ~ ~~tr Y I ~ I, °,~ l ~11~' J / .- / 1 '_~ I~ I /~ ~ ~ ~~ J ~ ~~ I ~ / i ~I ~ , _ J' ~I ri ; _ ~_ ~~ ~4 '.__ / '~l_ ^ '~ u / % ~ L~ i J J i" __ _ ~.~`"`'''~'~:, CITY OP RA\CI-lo CCC,~,\10\'GA Lj ' ®~ ENGIXEERI\G DIVISION ~~ VICINIT\' ,11AP 1~ ivn MAP 7827 ,ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ANNEXATION N0.20 ~9__~LiVC _- :_ _ _ -- - ~~f W•- ~ i ..Q»y ~~6 •• n...i YL :_f///J f.:• _ •f11• • I `~~;_~\~;, CITI' OP R~\\CIiO CI;CA,~10\CA ~,p/~~\ ~~ ~~~! ;~ ENCINF.ER11\G DIVISION TRACT 11577 ~ b " VICINIT}' n1AP N 1977 • ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 20 ._ •~ .... Ili ~--'--'~~--------~" '-~~ ~,\ ;i ~;- - - ~~ ~ -' i ~'~:i ' .::. 1 I i i .~ ~ ~~~~~ . ~ . ~ . - \~ ~ ~.G ~o~~~='~0~,. clTV or a,~~cl-lo ct;c,~,~loxc~, ~,,,~-'~k~ T ~:,rr x e~cl~reRl~`c on'ISIO~ ~, ~J z 19n - " VIC(\ITY i~tAP N TRACT 12523 RESOLUTION N0. f9~-}6.968 e~S'7~-- • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 20 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D[STR ICT N0. 1 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12523, 11572 AND PARCEL MAP 1621 WHEREAS, the City Council cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of December, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84-326 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 84-326 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 84-326 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, farm, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of Lhe City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to alt persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of • Intention No. 84-326, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of intention No. 84-326, be done and made; and SECTION 2: 8e it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are herehy approved. lJ ;/O SECTION 4: 6e it finally resolved that said assessments shall not • begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on .Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe et, City C erk jaa • • STAFF REPORT v DATE: January 16, 1965 T0: City Council & City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: 8arh ara Kroll, Engineer Technician ~O C y 9 < ( }3~J y,~ Z~c~t~!-' ~ L 19T- SUBJECT: Ordering the work in connection with Annexation Nn. 7 and No. 5 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and 2 Attached, for City Council approval, are resolutions ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 5 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for the following tracts: • District No. 1 (arterial) Tract 12523 Tract 11571 Tract 12365 Parcel Map 1827 (parcels 2 & 3 District No. 2 (local) Tract 12523 Tract 11511 Parcel Map 7827 (parcels 2 & 3) The Engineer's Report for both districts are also attached for final approval. These reports show the estimated costs of the districts and include a location map for each tract. Letters of Intent to join the districts have been received from the developer of each tract. Letters have been sent to the developers and the resolution of intent has been placed in the Daily Report Newspaper giving time and date of public hearing. RECgMENDAiIDN It is recommended Chat City Council adopt the attached resolutions ordering the subject annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 & 2. Res ec tful su tted, L H• K.ko Attachments /'1 ~ ~~..~~ Dctober 25, 1984 LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT 6t CONTRACTING City of Rancho Cucamonga c/o John Martin, Engineering 93ZG C uaszline Road Ranc he Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tract =12523 Gentlemen: We arz rea uesti ng that the above Tract =12523, lcca tzd just east of Archibald, no r[h side of Lenon „venue, be addzd Ln ^. h~ Landscape and Lighting Mai r.tznance • District R--?mac tf L;GHT?.ER i~~ GEORGE H GHL/sg cc: Dan oily. OEVELO P'4E.'I LI GHT77ER Guerra, Civil Engineer 1J63 NNa FOOIMII Boulwara . Swb e • UpNnO, Calilornia 9178E p111>HB@817 Conlr. UC, NO. EJtYINI // 3 .o. bane ~ rls~ociates .o. 902 wtst nin eh et rcc[ upland. calif. 91756 i1~~9c1 ~)GJ? • October 25, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Public ~dorks Department 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Lloyd Hu bbs, City Engineer Re: Tract 11577 As land owners of Tract 11517 we hereby agree to annex to the Landscape and Street Lighting Oistr ict. J Very truly yours, Lane & Associates s//Jn/ Terrance A. Lane Owner ds JN: 79-17 r 1 • civil engineers land Planners .designers sun~eyors . Western Properties nee Nvm nbunram A:e<„a / co eo. e/o/ wa~a. ~inana miss/~iaroesocn October 22, 1994 Cit7 of Aancho Cucamonga Gnginee ring Division 9320-C Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTEYTTOY: Barbara Kr all Re: Tract :lo. 12365 Intention to So in '4aintenance Districts Dear Barbara: This letter wi 11 evidence our intention to have Tract No, 12365 anne:ced into the Following maintenance assessment disc[ icts: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) • 9Creet Lighting ;daintenance District No. 4 (:e rra Vista Planned Conv7uni ty ) Street Lichtinq Maintenance District No. 1 (Citywide arterials) Cordially, Kay Matlock Authorised Agent /km Calmark DavNOpmant Corporallon eG4 ve,..cs • September 7, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Rick Gomez Re: Parcel D1ap 7827 Dear Mr. Gomez: This letter will advise you that Calmark Development intends to join into the landscape and lighting maintenance districts of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. /S/in er7 y-,~ • L Jim McIntire Vice President Engineering SM/le • 2121 CloveAleW BIM., Saito 202, P.O. Boa 2128, Santa Monim, Celllomla 90408 (279) 1634773 N~ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting 7Aainten ante District No. 1 Annexation No. 7 for Tract Nos. 11577, 12523, 12365 and Parcel Map 7827 SECT[Otl 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Rrt icle 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhii,it "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to he maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: • The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of gener ai benefit to all areas in the District and cost sha 11 be divided on a per lot basis. [n the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Oetaiied maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. // 7 The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 • (including Annexation No. 7 comprised of 571 units and 10 9500E street lights is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate** 9500E 5 9.90 5800E 104 8.75 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate Mo's Total 157 X 9.90 X 12 = 18,651.60 104 % 8.75 X 12 = 10,920.00 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = 29 571.60 = 6.55/year/unit No. of Units in District 4~).2 6.55 divided by 12 = .54 /mo./unit • Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and Labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Annexation No. 7. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is prepos ed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts rese'.~tien instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. • 3. City Councii adopts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets public hearing date. // a • 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • ~~ s EXHIBIT "A" • Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 7 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Project No. of units Arterial Lights Tract 11577 7 S.F. 0 Tract 12523 35 S.F. 3 (9500) Tract 12365 230 Condos 7 (9500) Parcel Map 7827 3 05 A~t s.~ 0 ~ ~~ ~ 577 r 1 LJ /~~ ASSESS~IiE~VT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE d15TRICT NO.1 • ACINEXA710N NO. 7 _ I _ _. I - ' '- ~ _ i ' _. ' ~ ~. I ~._. ._ ~ %~' Ir.l - _ - ---_ - - -; I I - ..,~~. i ~ i ~ ~_. . _, 1, ~~ i~ 1 - _ '~ o`"=--!~5>. CITY OF RANCAO CUCAMONGA "ale' ,, ,~ TRACT I c z ~' ~' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ~ ..YYi~„ ~' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T V i , I> ~v Ifn LLOYD M11995. CITY ENGINEER RCE 23A89 DCTF P~B~ ASSESSME~JT DIAGRAM -~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 • A!'JNEXATION NO. 7 ~ ~ - , ~ c ~ ~ . _ ,_. .. n 1 .... ri __ i r.... ~ _ °""`~0~~ CITY OF `~ $ANCAO CUCAMONGA tide; ~4: z .~> !'~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO • ~ rand ;i z ~~ 6 ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA irn '' N LLOYD HU99S, CITY ENGINEER RCE.23A89 Dg7E P~ e '~ ~.. ~ B ASSESS1flE~IT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 P,CJNEXATION NO. 7 ~-, -___ ~- ' 1~' .. i - ~,~ _ ., CS1-.,i,' ~.. __ ~ ~/ - - i ~ ~. i ^' i ill f jam.. ~ ~ ' ~f, _,- _ _ .. ~~l _ r~ .n~.. __ ~ _ ~ r ~- -i -~ ~ i 'I J ;;c r s-~' _ - i. ~', `~, I ~:. ,~ I Spy,-!!~~> y^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ 6'dr~Ee~ MAP ~s2~ z,.,~~,4`,~,T COUNTY OF 3AN BERNARDINO '~' 3TATE OF CALIFORNIA a N ~: ~. ~ nn LLOY~HU°85 CITY ENGI'y==R R~E238B9 04TE page- ~ ASSESS~IlE~lT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ACJNEXATION NO. 7 '~~ `~,: ~'~, ~. ~~ ,. :~; - 'i ... ~ ~~ r 1 i i _ ~~~i 1 1 i // '' •~~' ~~ ~~~ (lC\\I~ ~o°i"""~''c, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ ._- e• ' = COUNTY OF 3AN BERNARDINO ~ _ :y~~^. 'c; t'. ~~ `~ ' "~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA N ~fn ' LLOYD HUB9S CITY ENGIN.ER RcF 23Aao n:.~ 1 ~ page • RESOLUTION N0. {S}.36r951t it S - /3 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12523, 11577, 12365 AND PARCEL MAP 7827 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of December, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84-322 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance Oistr ict No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 84-322 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the Lity Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all Dersons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of • Intention No. 84-322, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proDOSed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 84-322, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e- p~F ort are hereby approved. 7~S SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent • of said tracts have been occupied. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this !6th day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on a s, ~ ayor ATTEST: Bever y q. Authe et, ity erk jaa ya6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting tlainten ante District No. 2 Annexation No. 5 for Tract to s. 12523, 11571 and Parcel Map 7927 are: SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Div i;ion 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance determined chat the street lights to all lots within said tracts as well street lights. annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit District No. 2. The City Council has he maintained will have an effect upon as on the lots directly abutting the Wort to b° provided for with the assessments established by the district • The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall 6e divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and spar if ications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing far the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. •~ All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs far assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. !~7 The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 • (includi~ig Annexation No. 5 comprised of 347 units and 22 street lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate** *High Pressure Sodium Vapor **SCE Schedule LS-1. All night service per map per month, effective January 1, 1983. Lamps Rate Mo's Total 315 X 8.75 X 12 53,3075.00 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Tot a1 Annual Maintenance Cost 53 3075.00 27.82/year/unit No. of Units in District 8II 9 27.82 divided by 12 2.32 /mo./unit • Assessment shall apply to each tot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Oiagr ams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 6. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the Distrf ct and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to [he District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings, 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's • Report. /~~ ' 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District anJ gets • public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modif ie5 and approves the individual assessments. U / 1'^ EXHIBIT "R" Properties and improvements to 6e included within Annexation No. 5 of Street Lighting Nainten an ce District 2: Project No. of Units arterial Lights Tract 12523 35 S.F. 13 Tract 11577 7 S.F. 3 Parcel I-0ap 7827 Parcel 293 305 Apts. 6 347 • • 130 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 O,NNEXATION NO. S • i~ ~- ____- __,-----_-,_._ _- r- r--~ ~ ~_~'_.._- -- ___ __ - ,~J ~-_~~i.,.,-rte =I _~~-~„~.~`~---`.J ' -- ,.. -- °"'~~~°'^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .~; w ~r ~ ~^ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO , \ _; ~ ii STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ ,~; N itn LLOYD MUBB$ CITY ENGINEER RCF 7iAno .'~ page ASSESSMEPIT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 P.NNEXATION NO. 5 _ 9+L~L'nE__]ap _ ~ ~ / 1.~ ~ "1.~.-_ P.'. ~ - ~3- A ~~ ~ - ~ i ~ a~ _.f ,~: _ ~ , r , ~ ~ -_. ~ .~ 1: 5 I ~_.J ^,I; _ 11 __ _1-a~ ,.~`-"~"O~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Sf~~ ,';, ~~%,;.L;,'~: COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~1 ~~~ .; N nn LLOYD NUBBS CITY ENGINEER RCE.23B89 DATE 1 page • ASSESSAAEiVT DIAGI;gryl • STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 O,NNEXATION NO 5 __ ~J----_ _~~ ~ i I ~ ~ J I ~,.y „' r.,7 ~~,.~ ~~, . I~ r = r ~~I ~ ~ _ ~~ i I ~ ~ ~/ ~ I I ,I_ ~ Il' ,. J ,1 ~ ter- --~ r; ~ ~ - ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~`0`~=~n'^ CITY OF RANCHO CUC >'~~ ;;, AMONGA AAA ~~~iP; =•,f~=.- . \ COUNTY OF gAN BERNARDINO / \ P4RfF~~~ ~, ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~- N _____ LLOYO HU885 CITY ENGINEER R,gE23R99 p-qTE page RESOLUTION N0. ~EOE-i~6-B4R as -iy • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNERAT[GN N0. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12523,11577 AND PARCEL MAP 7821 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of December, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84-324 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to Street Lighting D~aintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 84-324 was duly and legally published in the time, farm and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of • Intention No. 84-324 according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of Lhe City Clerk; and WHEAERS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION is I~ is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 84-324 be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~ SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer'ss ere hereby approved. ~J SECT[ON 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent • of said tracts ave been occupied. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on i e s, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y R. Au the et, ity erk jaa • C ~3~ n~mv no n STAFF REPORT ~~cv ,M~"P~ V ~, ''' F 19.: DATE: January 16, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84-OS - CARYN PLANNEC COMMUNITY - A development District Amendment to prezone unincorporated territory as "Caryn Planned Community" for approximately 248 acres of land, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west - APN 225-141-08, 12 thru 19, 21 thru 28, and 225-151-01-03, 07, 08, and 10 thru 13. • Council Action Requested: At the January 9, 1985 meeting, the Planning Commission held public hearings on the Caryn Planned Community and related items, and recommended approval of the project to the City Counci~. The proposed Planned Community site is located in the unincorporated County territory just outside the City limits, north of Highland, between the extensions of Milliken and Rochester Avenues, and is currently the subject of annexation proceedings 6y the City. At tonight's meeting, the City Council Ss requested to review the Planned Comznu nity/Development Plan, hold a public hearing, and conduct a first reading of the Ordinance approving the Planned Community/Development Plan Text. The rpproval of the Caryn Planned Cononunity/Development Plan Text will serve two necessary functions: The Development Plan Text and illustrations will become a master plan and guide for the ultimate development of the property, much in the same way other Planned Community texts are utilized in the City. Approval of the text will constitute "prezoning" of the property in relation to existing annexation laws. Upon annexation, the "Caryn Planned Community" designation will automatically become the "zoning" for the site; that is the provisions of the Development Plan Text will in effect become the regulatory mechanism guiding future development of the site. /3~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DDA 84-05 Caryn Planned Community Page 2 Project Description: The entire site slated far annexation and eventual inclusion in the Caryn Planned Community contains approximately 248 acres (Exhibit "6"), About 221 acres are under the control of the Caryn Development Company. Negotiations are currently under way by Caryn to acquire three small outpieces for inclusion in the project. While the Caryn Planned Community designation is intended to cover the entire 248- acre site, City Council review and approval at this point only encompasses 227 acres and 902 dwellings as outlined in the Development Plan Text and Exhibit "C". If the. outpieces are acquired and successfully incorporated into the project design, additional iots not to exceed total of 960 for the entire project, and a amendment cf the Planned Community Text would be necessary. • A detailed staff report to the Planning Commission, outlining the key issues and elements is attached for your review and consideration. It should be noted, however, that City Council approval of the Tentative Tract Map is not required by City Ordinances; approval of Tentative Tract 12642 is final with Planning Commission action, suhj ect to the ultimate approval of the Planned Community Text by City Council. It • should also be noted that the Development Agreement, reviewed and recommended far approval by the Planning Commission, is not the subject of tonight's hearing. The agreement will be brought back to the City Council for public hearing and consideration at the February 6, 1985 City Council Meeting. Recommendations: Based on the Planning Commission direction, it is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing on the Caryn Planned Community and conduct a first reading of the ordinance approving the Planned Community/Development Plan Text. Issuance of a Negative Declaration on the project is also recommended. Res4ectfuliy subQitted, ~,~..., . ,. _..~m~ .Rick mez' City Planner RG:OK:cv Attachment • /37 ENV iRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOA 84-06 Caryn Planned Community Page 3 Exhibits: Planned Co~nuni ty/Development Plan text (Attached separately) "P.C." Staff Report "A" - Location Map "B" - Planning Area Boundaries "C" - Development Plan Boundaries "D" - Park Plan "E" - Phasing Plan "F" - Site Utilization (TT 12642) "G-1" - Grading/Tract Map "G-2" - Grading/Tract Map "H" - landscape Plan (TT 12642) "J" - Initial Stutly Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval City Council Ordinance • u l3B STAFF REPORT V ~,,~'`~`~~. ~!~~` `~~' .9;- DATE: January 9, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Krouti 1, Senior Planner L I SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84-OS - CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY - A development district amendment to prezone unincorporated territory as "Caryn Planned Community" for approximately 248 acres of land, located between the extensions of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west - APN 225-141- 08, 12 thru 19, 21 thru 28 and 225-151-01-03, 07, 08, and 10 thru 13. TENTATIVE TRACT 12642 - CARYN - A residential subdivision of 4 0 lots on acres of land, which is Phase I of a larger master planned community, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and .vest, APN as above. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CARYN - A Development Agreement between the ity of Rancho Cucamonga and Caryn Development Company, Kaufman and Broad Land Company, and Marlborough Development Corporation relative to properties located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Rvenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west, APN as above. ABSTRACT: The City Council has entered into an Annexation Agreement for the County-approved Caryn Planned Community site, and annexation proceedings are currently under way. The Planning Commission is requested to (1) review the Planned Community/Development Plan text, (2) review and approve Tentative Tract 12462 for Phase I of the project, and !3) review the draft Development Agreement between the City xnd Developers to guarantee development of the site in conformance with the Planned Community provisions. Approval of all three items is recommended. Y. J ! 39 ITEMS H, I, 8 J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Page 2 1L BACKGROUND: County approvals: In June of 1986, the County Board of Supervisors granted their approval to the Caryn Company residential project. The entire Caryn planning area consists of approximately 248 acres and is located in the County territory adjacent to our Ctty limits on the north side of Highland Avenue, between the extensions of Milliken and Rochester, (Exhibit "A"). Prior to the County approvals, the City staff worked closely with the County to assure that the City's interests and concerns he reflected in the design of the praj ect. The City Planning Commission has reviewed the project at the May 23, 1984 meeting and expressed general satisfaction and support for the project, subject to several conditions. These conditions have since been fncorporated into the project as conditions of approvai 6y the County. At this point, the developers of the project have all the necessary County apps vats, including the approval of the Tentative Tract map far phase i, to proceed with the construction of the project outside of the City, in unincorporated County territory. Annexation Agreeawant: • Subsequent to the County approval, the City staff has negotiated an agreement with the property owner and developers to annex antl develop • the site in the City rather than develop in the County. This is consistent with local Agency Formation Commiss un policy of encouraging urban development to occur in incorporated cities where the necessary urban sery ices can be providetl most effectively. In this particular case, the development of the project will have an effect an the City of Rancho Cucamonga, whether of not it is actually within the tegai boundaries of the City. The future residents will be using our City's streets, parks, and schools, and will be dependent on other servf ces as well. Consequently, it is important that the City retain a degree of control over the project area, and that revenues generated 6y the development flow back into the City. R eco9nizing the need for the annexation of the property, the City Couneil has entered into a binding Annexation Agreement with the property owner and the two developers invoived, (Marlborough Development, and Kaufman and Broad). Among the points agreed upon were the items outlined below: Annexation and development of the project in the City. Payment of development fees to the City rather than the county. Construction of the project in substantial conformance with County approvals. ADproval by the City of the County-approved Planned Community Development Plan Text and Tentative Tract map, with • conditions of approval no more onerous than those imposed by the County. PLANNING COMMISSION STRFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 • Page 3 5. Approval by both the City and the developers at the time of annexation of a Development Agreement closely patterned after the Annexation Agreement. Planning Con~ission Action ReGUired In order to follow the terms of the agreement, the Planning Commission will need to review and formally act on the following items: 1. Review and approval of the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan text for the entire site. As with other planned communities, the provisions of the text will in effect become the zoning for the property. 2. Review and approval of Tentative ~fract 12642, depicting first phase of the project. 3. Review of the proposed Development Agreement. Following Commission action on the three items tonight, your recommendations wi'1 be forwarded to the City Council for a first reading of the ordinance on January 16, 1985. III. CAR Vii PLANNED COMMUNITY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN TEXT • Actions ReQUested: The action reques t;d, the approval of the Caryn Planned Community/Development Plai Text, will serve two necessary functions: 1. The Development Plan text and illustrations will become a master plan and a guide for the ultimate development of the property, much in the same way other planned community texts are utilized in the City. 2. Approval of the text will constitute "prezoning" of the property in relation to existing annexation laws. Upon annexation, the "Caryn Planned Community" will automatically become the "zoning" for the site; that is the provisions of the Development Plan text will in effect become the regulatory mechanism guiding future development of the site. Current provisions call for a 300 acre minimum in the development of planned communities in the City. The intent is to provide a process for initiation, review, and regulation of large scale comprehensively planned urban communities, but to also afford the maximum flexibility to the developer within the content of an overall development program and specific, phased development plans, coordinated with the provision of necessary public services and facilities. in this instance, the Intent of the punned community provisions can be met on a site smaller than normally required in the City: / ~'! PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Page 4 lJ 1. The site was Dlanned, reviewed and approved by the County, consistent with their development regulations. 2. The site is virtually surrounded by subst anti ai physical barriers such as the flood control lands to the north and west and the proposed Route 30 Freeway on the south. 3. The project was designed as a master planned and integrated community from the very inception of the project. The community's own special identity is based on a system of open space that ties the community together. The backbone of this open space network is a parkway corridor. It links the north/south pedestrian greenbelts and a nei ghbarhood park; it also connects the community to the major north/south arterials along its boundaries and to the possible future commercial center site. In order to assure development of the project in conformance with the provisions of the Development Plan as approved by the County and as outlined in the Annexation Agreement, the Planned Community approach is desirab]e, and regulation under conventional development district provisions, impractical. Project Description: The entire site slated for annexation and • eventual inclusion in the Caryn Planned Community contains approximately 248 acres (Exhibit "B"). about 227 acres are under the control of the Caryn Development Company. Negotiations are currently underway by Caryn to acquire several small outpieces for inclusion in the project. While the Caryn Planned Community designation is intended to cover the entire site, Planning Commision review and approval at this point only encompasses 227 acres and 902 dwellings as outlined in the Development Plan text, (Exhibit "C"). If the outpieces are acquired and successfully incur por ated into the project design, additional lots would be created in Phase II and modifications of the Planned Community text and Planning Commission review will be necessary. The following is a project summary as currently proposed. Caryn Planned Community (Total Site) 248 acres Caryn Planned Community/Development Plan Provi stops 227 acres Number of Dwellings 902 location -North side of Highland, between Milliken and Rochester Current Land Use: Site - Vacant North -Vacant East -Vacant, SF R's South - Vacant, Victoria Planned Community West -Vacant • u PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Page 5 • The proposed Planned Community would consist predominantly of single family dwellings, containing 402 units at buildout of the plan under commission review. All homes are to be located on individual lots of variable size located on cul-de-sacs or closed loop streets which connect to controlled access collector loops. These in turn lead to the community parkway road or backbone. Arterials abutting the Planned Community, ie. Milliken, Rochester, and Banyan, have been sized to accommodate future development to the north of the project, in accordance with Lhe City General Plan. All streets proposed by the project will be constructed at the time of development and dedicated as public streets. To the south of this project, the right-of-way for the Foothill Freeway is preserved. While this is not a part of the City or County requirements, the property owner has indicated he would consider donating the freeway right-of-way to the City to assist its implementation. The Planned Community is proposed to he developed in two major phases: Phase I encompasses the western portion of the project site, Phase II the eas [ern portion, (Exhibit "E"). Phase I already has an approved tentative tract map by the County and is planned for single family detached homes. North of the project parkway, 5,500 to 11,000 square • foot lots are planned, and south of the parkway, 4,000 to 10,000 square foot iots are planned. The final design for phase II has yet to be finalized and a tentative tract map submitted to the City. However, the Planned Community Development Plan text calls fir a subdivision pattern similar to Phase I. The precise design of the tentative tract map far Phase II will depend in part on whether or not tie three out parcels can be acquired and successfully incorporated into the site layout. Phase I of the project contains approximately 12.5 acres of open space, consisting of both pedestrian greenways and trails connecting the various neighborhood clusters and a centrally located 7 to 8 acre "Caryn Park" that the property owner intends to donate to the City. While the entire park area is shown in Phase I, approximately half of the park will actually be developed with the first phase of the project. Exhibit "D" illustrates the proposed park design in concept. Final park plans are yet to be finalized. Site Characteristics: The entire site contains approximately 248 acres o and, gent y sloping at approximately 4 1/2%. The site is vacant, and with the exception of alluvial scrub contains no sign if Scant or mature vegetation. The site abu tts on the Victoria Planned Community on the south and is defined by the proposed Foothill Freeway to the south extensions of Milliken and Rochester to the west and east and by Banyan Avenue on the north. Facts for Findings: In order to recommend approval of the Planned Community Development Plan text to the City Council, the Planning Commission must determine that the approval of the Planned Community/Development Plan text shall: ^? PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Page 6 • 1. Provide for the development of a comprehensively planned urban community that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternative regulations. 2. Provide for development that is consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. 3. Provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilitfes, and public services required by development within the project area. IY. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 11642 General: The Tentative Tract maD submitted for City review has wady been approved by the County of San Bernardino. The map encompasses Phase I of the project, 115 single family lots on 410 acres located in the westerly half of the Planned Community The proposed tract is divided by the east/west spine street, with each half of the tract built around a closed loop street with a series of cul-de-sacs. These in turn are interconnected by a greenway and trail system, in accordance with the overall concept of the Planned Community. • Grading and Drainage: The Grading Committee has reviewed and approved in the conceptual grading plan submitted for TT 12642, subject to a limitation on the height of slopes not to exceed 20'. In addition, review and approval of a final grading plan prior to the issuance of grading permits will be necessary and is recommended a5 a provision of tentative tract approval. Finally, the design details of the retention basins to the east of Phase I must also be submitted prior to gr adf ng permit issuance. Landsca in A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted to the ity, xhibit "H"). A final landscape plan will be required prior to the issuance of permits. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT As already noted, the City Council has entered into an Annexation Agreement with the property owner and developers. This agreement outlines the terms of both the annexation and the development of the property. To comply with the provisions of State Law, a separate Development Agreement will be required upon annexation to the City. The draft Development Agreement, attached for your review, • implements the Annexation Agreement provisions. It is virtually .'~'~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Page 7 • identical to the approved Annexation Agreement, except that the provisions dealing with annexation of the property have been eliminated. The principles of- the agreement are that any duplicate approvals of the project be consistent with City format, but that there he no conditions more onerous than those contained in the original County approvals and that certain fees would not be applied to the property (Systems fee and Beautification fee). The Park fee and Storm Drain fee would not be assessed since extensive storm drains and park and open space improvements are part of the development approvals. The owners of the property agree with inclusion in the landscape, and street lighting maintenance districts as well as in the Day Creek Mello Roos District. Owner also agrees to payment of all school fees. All negotiated points are contained in the Development Agreement. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS A detailed Environmental Analysis Report was prepared by the County of San Bernardino at the time of County review of the project. The report focused on environmental topics identified during the review process, including geology, flood control and drainage, circulation, noise, air quality, community services and • public utilities. As a result of the rev eiw, the county issued a mitigated negative declaration for the projects. The City staff was involved in the review process and worked closely with the County on development of appropriate modifications to mitigate potential environmental effects. All these modifications have since been incorporated into the project and its conditions of approval. In light of the above, Staff has prepared a new Initial Study, (Exhibit "J") addressing the potential for environmental effects of the project as modified, and identified no impacts that could be considered significant. Consequently, the issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. VII. CORRESPONDENCE /P UBL [C INPUT the items associated with this project have been advertised in the Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation for a public hearing. To date, no correspondence has been received on the project. VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission should review and hold a public hearing PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Page 8 on the items outlined in this report. SubseQuent to the hearing, • the following actions are recommended: 1. Adopt Resolution recommending approval of the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan text, prezoning the entire 248 acre site, to the City Council. 2. Rdopt Resolution conditionally approving Tentative Tract 12642, depicting first phase of this project. 3. Adopt Resolution recommending approval of Che draft Development Agreement to the City Council. Respectfully su bmilted, ~~ t Rick Gomez, City Planner R G:OK:cv attachments Exnibits: Planned Community/Development Plan T=xt (Attached separately) • "A" - location Map "B" - Planning Area Boundaries "C" - Development Plan Boundaries "D" - Park Plan "E" - Phasing Plan "F" - Site Utilization (TT 12642) "G-1" - Grading/Tract Map "G-2" - Grading/Tract Map "H" - Landscape Plan (TT 12642) "I-1-20" Elevations "J" - Initial Study Resolutions: Resolution recommending approval of Planned Community, with conditions. Resolution approving TT 12642, with conditions. Resolution recommending approval of Development Agreement with draft development agreement. • DEER CANYUN DAV CANNON \ / COUNTY OF SAN RERNAROINO - - ~ rJ~ ~ I "~ % I L. 1 CITY Of RANCHO \ CUCAMONGA ~ SPHERE Of INFLUENCE -- ~ T\\• / CITY Df RANCHO CHA I • CUCAMONGA COLLEGE f RAVVgY AVE ~ ~ ~ / r _- - /} •~ . • ..r l i ~ PROPOEE^ FDOTHIII FREEWAY ITE T I / HIGHLAND 4VE ~ VICTORIA ~ / ~ PIANNEO COMMUN T h Y BgEELIYE AVE. .-. I Y FOD'HIL1 BWD I .{ 1' ' P ; > a Q Q ~ WW P l ° i c A a _ ~ W I _ 3 > '< i i i a S4N B I E RNARDINO I FREE'~ I /4v I-10 EXHIBIT 2 VICINITY MAP PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN RERNARDINO COUNTY, CA LIFORNiA ~~T ~~ y~ ~,OCAT~A`l ' '-"- MA9TER PLAN y~, ~ ~ CARYN PARK ~ ,~,~ THE CARYN CO~ ~ ~ \ ~ _ s ~ r`~~ _, ' _ ~ ~ ~~~ rte. ..• y` ; Jt T J W ~ __- ~.~ ~ ;_ r. .~' /` `~__ _ . O K_.... ~.a l ~, t? , v ,, ~,. ' ~-~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~,., f ~.~;~~~ • ~,~~~ ~ ,~ PHASEI iliaa.L~~s ,. L ~_ ` ,i p ;~~ '~,~`F1d~~'= 0 <_v _.<~-. o -- - --;~,~_ __ dc- - it S PART . = '~ i _ - ,l ~~ S l SIOENTI~L -f I _ _ ~= ~ ouTVARCELs 1~.1'~~F~,~~;'." l~ r~ LEGEND ~"~ L'I .,~f I xt ~~ PP4EE UrvE - ~}}l44[ v: l ~' i" ~ .1 ' ~ .. ALTERNATIVE LO7 IAVOUT EXH191T 5 (MIITN FiATE A.O.W. -UNCNAOE) PROJECT PH r.51NG PLAN PROPERTIES AT N1ILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BEPNPgpv+O Cou NT V, CPLIFORNIP /~ ~ ~~~ ~ 4~ 7 W ~~/(yam/~p~~/~/' / ~ ~ r Z W O U ~ Q ' ~ ~ ~ ~N F-d. . JZW jcv. a 4. ~ J I-p aZ . F ~ w ~ H Q ~ Z a ALin PNNC9 :InnOld Vntlf Y ~ \ e°~ ~ . :nvovn 4k i yy it ~; ~-g W ~R„ N f ~ ~ ~ ~ f U V. F ~ ~ c 1 u ~ ~ a h~.N ~ 2 F .. ~ ~ Y Y ~ ~ ii f z za~n 8 ~ IJ d~ ~ .., ~ ~~~ f a ~~ ~ > a I~~; ' 1 r. ti ..- +~ inv~vn~ Lnv~an i', ter a'7~0, $ v n i n n . { / '' l -srrF 47'7Gr7 ~ , ,, t Y , , ~ ' V / r~ 'r ~ drWN~ YW3G F tt . ; ~ ~ ~~ r ~r ~ j3 ! \ ~ ' ~ . ° F ' ~ a 4 _ ~z a ~ s H' sg Y " yyG vz S 1 i143/V 43.• --M Jam' ~~~ ` f ~: ~ i ~ .3~ _ _ ~~ i ~ f'' _ ._ ' 2 ~ _- i _ s .~aE .~~ 3 :: r v i ~ : . :! - i _- ! -_ _ _ .. . - ~ (. ~ ~ a ~ T - - ~~3 '1: : n- -- L~ . ~ a: ` r_-_ ~ . ~, f_. ~- . i ~t _ ~ fi 1 L~ i:~1 Y, x 3`r i 4 _ _ ~ ~ , -. ..._ .` . 2~ ~1i1ii;; `'CIE ~' "il' E; ' .° .. ~~ ~ , , ~:' iy„ . .. . 111 >>i: :i~ l~ Y . . _ raliuu-r ri~_~) ~,rnrF- ~ ~~ ~Din/~~~CT MrIP J ,~ i; I i li:i J _ _ ~ti `~' 9 ~i//~/l /1 1~ -~~ ~' ~ ~~' is __ <o J ` 6 ~ w • ~ i W r~ u ~ . i~;! u ~ V . ~j! a ~ I vi = u J~~1 . ._.___~ ~) ",.... _. S ~ tl • , ~ v ~ ~ - ! i i I'i f ~! I- -r- i~ I t,II`~'F ~ '' , ILA + ~ '" I ~ j ~~ i j ~ ., ?~4?,+` ~~"'~~ `'~~----~ ~~~--~ ~~~ ~,j it f ~ L. ~ ` i ~ ~ _ ~ '. i , -'~--1II~~,,d''~r- ~ ~ ±a . " :y .w ,h_ `~ ~ ' Iii Z '` s,._s '~' I • • isv ~-1 ---,-r-, --, i '~~ ~ ~' ,; ; _~ J I° '` _ o^' 1 ~~ - ~ -- ~o_ ',~ -~ i I ~1 y 7 ',~ ~ "' E _-~ 1 ~ :i i1~4•~,; i, 1 I ~'ij tsl ' j~i~ '~ ,e~; '9't'ef .i~__'? •/ ' • , 1 ~'!~ i 1'• I{ L 1 "~ "V ~vr /S'f it a • t~ a r~ ~' } ~ " ~'°1 1 3r, i *I, ~- ~. ~__ i ~! ; ~ ; . ~: ~~, . ~~ , ~ ~.; ~~a:~ it : - ~~ ~' ~.. f~ _ :' ~ ~, ~, ', rj ? t, '~ '~r i f I~ ~ ~ ~ ii y ;! iii ~ ~, b'~ it ;{~~ ~ ~ i~', 3 , ?, _ „~, z: ~.~_ ~~~i ---- ;~ ----- - ~,~ ~v `---' R ~; • • ~s ~ T_~ • 6; ... _. i it 1{ ~ e, 3 ~; T ~---/w~Mi-- --L • . _~ ; ~ ~~ : i un~ , : ~ ~,, t { ~ ~~~ is ~~ i ~ } ` ~ ,... .-. ~ _ ~ ~ .,~~~i~j~ '` 3~ ,iii ii ~ ~. ~. ~ .... ili tti ~_ '1 - ~., c + _ ~i;y~ 3 x. _- ` ~_; .fie ~yn-+~ ~. ~~~ _~~r 9 b J\ •~ •~ 4, '~~ 1 ~; ~ ''' 3 'r ~t °1 „` ~- ~ n~ n '•,+ ~ `-r~Y o ~ __ ~u•';+} ~+Y • ~~-~-y~ I . if f i i ~~ ~~ Il j -- i -, _ ; ~ ~~_ Tk _.~.. ..f. L= __ ~ y ~~ ~- a Y . 3. _ .. .._-T."~ ~ ~~ • • !S l r ~ U ~, Tri x ~; ~s _.._.,~ 'r~~~;; ~: ~ ~_ ~ ~ I: -- - ----- _°_ `:=_ :, . ,, .. ~~ ~~- ~ _,. - :~ -~ ~; =~ L . l,, i tl •~; -_ j 1' ?) 1 ':1^ ~ ~• \ ii J 1 .-~JT' 7~ sip i !' ~ __~ _ ~' ~ ~ y a. •-- ., =~ V `'~ I ~ - `1 ~; :3. -, ~' . , i -"~~ ~. ~~ ~, is -;. L.... ____ ~ ~ 1 '7 ~ - ~!. V 3 .1 may, ~< >7®,::. i - 1 _ __ ~.F~ x .. ~ f:s»y ~~i .. .T C +~ ~ ; '; t • `J w W7 ~ / • ;, ~. ,. ~ --~ - 1 F~' is i ~3 I .. _ J i i f _ __ a /<~^ ~ -._ ~.-~~ ,, ~ , ;~ iai ~ `~ . -_ -~ -_ 4 fl ~•-'-- i ~ -. ~- ~ ~ _ - ~. ~~ ~- ~__ .~ - ~ r_ ~i ~- ~. --//I~ i.~V s-_ I~t ~ ~ .'~. _ -~ - ! ~ / i I f -~.-' .. .:`?~ _ _~- .r ~ r.~ ~~i • • ;~~ 2$ • ~, Y~ ~~ ~ ~;; Y :; .~ a .~ ~ _ ,:, i <, - _-. ......__ f=s _.. -.. - 1 .i _ IT ~-.. ' ...i --4 ~.-i ' t t . t ~^ ~ ~~ ~ ._. 1 1 'I 5., f i tom- °,ii .~ s ii,i ~_ _-r-~~_~.tl. .F Y. Vv -~U ~~ II ~ ~1 ~ I 2-4 L9 • :~ i, (' :~ y 4i ~., ' ~, ~. A' f . --y1 1 17 ~ ^~~-y+. 'f ~: Lq~ ~i r y, a i - f 1 i ~~_~. ~_- 9 ~~ ~: a !i a~ ~1 ~~' I~-~ • 1' 1~ s , E!~ x l d 3Y , ``~ j, z : i pY4 i t e ~ 'P Y ~~-~ 1 ~~!~ - - ~V . __ . 5 -_ • • ~~ci ~ %~ • • --_ ~_~ ~ ~ ~~ i . q ni •T '~"_~__~ ij I ~f ~h ~~ ~ Li it ___ ~ i i / i i / ~ i~ =- ~ .. i ~.._~ i f. .~i ..i ~~..- ' _ ~-Y JyL M .. ) ~ ^C ~~ r i~ :J ~ f,~ i `~~... 7 i -.iv ... ..:~ ` j i ~Ila i i .-a .,:. ?-If I~ ---~ ~ ~ ~~~ '` i I4, u -~1~-_.. _ _ r~,.~ _.. I~, ___ -~ ~ti --'`~ j _.. _. . ~ ... ., i ; _ _ _ {, •~ . `~= .L 1 •~ ~ _ ~. f ~~ SN : . .` ,1 :.~_ ~ ~ ~~ T ~1_ v • • • ;:c T-~7~ ~ a .~- ., :, c ~ . ~ ~ -'~ :.. Wit- . . ., ,~~ , ~~: ~'~ -~~ ~ _. .~ ~ _ - ~.. I i ~ I i y =~ _..~_ - -- -- 1,----~i_-- ~ -~ . -, ,;; :, ~~ x~ ~_ ~ _.. ___ ~ :~ _ .__ _ :,. ., _. _~~., ~~ ~ Z-~3 ~~ --:d ;f ~~. ~~ _~ ~._ .~ i - ~: =~-~ ~- .. ~- r `v~ .~~ ~~ ."r.~ `~ Fixa~-~' _ ~,Y'_,.. ~~r .. ~1~ `- ~~ ' '-ie: __- i" I. ~L - :... • • ,:~ ~-~a- i 's" ~'~, ic? Z-~~ } i __ - ~ ii yy n L J `J /'7= •~ , ~ I? -......-.--.~... ~~'i~i g~ ~ - .. %~ ~ . ~, - _<- - _-~ i~ /7' ? ~~ -~1}- -4-.• 1---~- ~ • --a~~ 7 _~ ,~X ~~ n - '__ _.T ~ '.. - i j 7(~ i ~ ~ ~ "_ • \ '1 - f ~1 ~• ~- ' 1 i ~~ ~~ ~:~ I •~ ~~ 2 'lf 1 __. TI1I~ ~. 1 TE ^, .q ~' • • ~~L/q • • ~: _~ T£ ~ ~~s = /9 __ _ __ i j ~- . ~ ~ .I. ~ ~. ~- -- _ ~~ \ tl ~ ~ i ~ ~ \ _~~ ~ ~=: -_---r ~, 1 _. i ~ '~, ~ • • • ~~ ?-zv ENVIItONM~..ITAL REVIEW • GENERAL APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further fnformation concerning the proDOSed project. Date Fil Project Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Name, Address, Telephone of Concerning this Project:, To Be Contacted /HIV 1 /_YI" • Location of Assessor's Parcel No.:~~5-~9~- /2, 131 15, IS/L i Yy22, ZQ 0 Z ~ List other permits necessary from and the agency fssuip9 such permit 1 agencies /'/~ , MILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO • 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ~C 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce x vibration or glare? _ 3. Create a subs tantf al Change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General i i ? Y gnat ons Plan des L _ 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? ]fir ~C ~j mp„~ I ~C _ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? _ _ Exp lanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets ff necessary): num ~ c _ / d • 7. Estimate the amount of sewa a and Solid waste materials this project will generate dai ly: ~~~~Y~fZ~y,,,io 1`w O 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this proJect• 47so 9. Estimate the amount of gradingg (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: Z~d~ O6l A 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: t hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: ' % / Signatur ..-~" Title -•,.... .~ • ~ ~: ~~ ''fir • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONHENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: APPLICANT: CARYN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TT 12642 FILING DATE: 12/19/84 LOC NDlIDER: DDA 84-05 PROJECT: CARYN PLANNED COPAIUNITY - 958 dwelling units on ' 248 acres pre-zone an en a ive rac map approva or ase PROJECT LOCATION: NEC Milliken and Highland I. ENl'IRO:VMEHTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have • signiEicanc results in: a. Uns cable ground condi efons or in changes in geologic relationships? X b, Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? K c. Change !n topography or ground surface K concour intervals? d. The des traction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? K e. My poeential Sncrease Sn wind or water erosion of soils, of feccing either on or off X site condi cons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or depoaltlon? X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- elldes, ground failure, or similar hazards? X h, M increase in the race of extraction and/or • uae of any mineral resource? - - J( 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant resin ce 3n: I '7'I Page 2 YES MAYBE NO •. Changes in turrencs, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream • channels? % 6. Changes So absorption rates, drainage pa [[erns, of the rate and amount wf surface eater runoff? % c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? % d. Change in the amount of surface water !n any body of water? % e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? % f. Alt era[ ion of groundwater charac[etistlcs? ~ g. Change in [he quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or wlth- dtavals, cz through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Qvanciey? x h. The reduction Sn the amount of water oc:-.er- • vise available for pu611c water supplies? x f. Exposure of people ar pro per [y to eater related hazards such as flooding or seiches? % 3. Air Quallcy. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile % or indl tact sources? Scatfonary sources? X~ b. Deterioration of amb lent air quality and/or interference with [he attainment of applicable air quality standards? % c. Alteration of local or regional clima[Sc cond Stions, affecting air movement, mo is cure or temperature? % 4. BSota Flora. Will the proposal have eignif Scant reault• in: • ^. Change in the chatsetarFs tics of species, including dlvsrsl ty, distribution, or number % of any spsciu of pLna? b. ladvetion of tha numbers of sny unique, rare x oe asdang•red specie of p tanu7 rn; - - • c. Introduction of neu or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Hill the proposal have significant tesul is in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of nev or dEsrup cSve species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migtat ion or awvemen[ of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of axis tang fish or wLldlife habitat? 5. Population. Gull the proposal have significant re sin cs in: • a. Will the proposal alter the loco cfon, discri- bucion, density, diversity, or grow ch rate of the human population of an area? b. Hill the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Hill the proposal have s£gnif icon[ results in: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, Including economic or commercial diversity, [ax rate, and property values? b. Will pro~ecc costs be equitably distributed among project benefSclaries, S,e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considers[ Sons Hill [he proposal have signif Scan[ resin [s in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of en area? 6. A conflict vlth any deaignaciona, ob~ec [iota, policies, or adopted plane of any governmental entities? c. M impact upon the qulsity or quantity of sxlstinQ cmnsumptFVa or non-consumptive recreational opportunities? ' ~ Page 3 YES MAYBE `70 X X X X x X X x X x X X X Page 4 YES MAYBE NO g. Tramepor[ation. Will the proposal have significant • results !n: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street cons tru<tlon? % c, Effec [s on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X d. Substantial Smpact upon existing transporta- tion systems? X e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- X t ion or movement of people and/or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water-borne, rail, mass trans is or X air [zaff ic? g. lnc reases in Crafflc hazards to motor vehicles, b icycl is is or pedestrians? % 9. Cul tural Resources. Will the proposal have • significant results in: a. A disturbance co ehe incegri cy of archa aological, paleon[o logical, and/or historical resources? X 10. Hea lth, Safely, and Nuisance Factors. Wili the proposal have slgnif Scant results In: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X b. Exposure of people eo poeenefal health hazards? % c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances Sn the even[ of an accident? % d. M increase in the number of ind Sviduals or spec Ses of vector or pathenogenlc organisms or [he exposuce of people to such organisms? % e. Increase in existing no lse levels? X f. Exposure of people ca potent is lly dangerous noise levels? % _ • g. The creation oP objectionable odo ra? _ X A. M increase in light or glare? X /~J Page 5 YES MAYBE NO • 11. Aesthetics. W111 the proposal have ^ignificant results 1n: a. The obatruc [ion or degradation of any scenic vista or view? % b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? X c. A conflict with the abl ec [ive of designated or potential scenic corridors? % 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. El etc ric power? X b. Natural or packaged gas? g c. Co®unica[ions systems? % d. Water supply? % e. Wastewater facilities? • f. Flood control structures? % g. Solid waste facilities? % h. Fire protection? g 1. Police protection? g ~. Schools? % k. Parks or other recteacional fat i11t1es? X 1. Maintenance of public fat Slltlea, including % roads and flood control fac111[ies? _ m. Other governmental services? X 13. EnerRY and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have signif icanc results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase Sn demand upon existing sources of energy. _ X _ c. M Encreese in the demand for development of new sources of energy? X d. M increess or perpatust ion of the consumption of non-rsnwsble forms of energy, when feasible X rsnswabls sources of snergy era avsilabL? - - !°I Page 6 YES MAYBE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or • atarce natural reaourte? 7( 14. Mandatory PSndinas of 51an£ficance. a. Does the project. have the potential to degrade the quality of [he environment, aubstan[ially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a Fish or wildlife population [o drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plan[ or animal community, reduce [he number or restrict the range of a rare ar endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of [he major perloda mf Califomla history or prehistory? X h. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, ca the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs Sn a relatively hzief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well Into the future). % c. Does the proj ec[ have Smpacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively cons Sderable? (Cumulatively considerable • means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed !n connection with [he effects of pace projects, and probable future proj ecta). K d. Does the proj ec[ have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse sffecta on human beings, either directly or iadirec cly? % II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HYALI7ATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mi[igaiion measures). SEE ADDENDUM. • /a > Page 7 III. DETERHINATSON • On the basis of Ch1s initial evaluation: a I find the proposed proiec[ COCLD NOT have a significant effect on the emrironment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant XX effect on the envlroiment, there will no[ be a significant effecc in this case 6ecauae the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED. Q I find the proposed prof ecc MAY have a aignif icanc effect an the envirnmen[, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT Ss rgquired. Daee Manua ry 9, 1985 City Planner • • lk 3 • AUUENUUM TO INITIAL STUDY PART II I1. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation (i.e., of affirmative answers to the a ove questions p us a iscu ss ion of proposed mitigation measures). The project site is located within a City adopted earthquake fault zone based upon the inferred location of the Red Hill fault, hence could expose people or property to gea log is hazards. Geotechn ical studies prepared for adjacent projects to the south and southwest indicate that ground rupture by faulting is remote. These studies concluded that no mitigation mesures were necessary and no setback restrictions for residences were proposed. On-site geotechnic al investigations have not indicated the presence of the fault on the site. Therefore, based upon these studies, the preponderance of evidence indicates the risk of potential ground rupture from faulting is low, therefore no significant impact or mitigation measures are warranted. 2. a.b.c.i The project site is located on a gently sloping alluvial wash traversed by several ephemeral stream channels. Day Creek, which is subject to flooding, is located to the east. Day Creek Channel is Currently • unimproved and could expose people or property to flooding in the easterly half (Phase II) of this Planned Community. Storm water facilities will be provided as part of the dev=lopment. Phase [ on-site storm water and off-site sheet flow will be directed west to the recently improved Deer Creek Channel. Phase II on-site drainage w111 be directed to Day Creek via the Highland Avenue spreading grounds at the southeast corner of the site. S.a The proposed Planned Community will contain up to 958 dwellings at buildout of the current proposed plan which will significantly alter the density, diversity and growth rate of Lhe area. Large scale master planned developments are also approved or proposed to the west and south within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed development, has been planned in accordance with the goals and directives of the County's Community Plan. 6.a. The proposed Planned Community will contain approximately 958 dwellings which will sign if icant ty change the local economic diversity, tax rate and property values. These impacts are considered positive changes rather than adverse impacts upon the local area. 7.a. Development of approximately 958 dwellings represents a substantial change of the present undeveloped land use. The proposed Planned Community has been planned in accordance with the goals and directives of the County's Community Plan. I~ ~J /pY 7.c. The proposed Planned Community will contain 16* acres of open space and • greenbelts, including acres intended as a memorial park site which will significantly improve recreation opportunities in the area. 8. a.b.g. Development of the proposed Planned Community will significantly increase vehicular movement creating demand for new street construction and increasing traffic hazards. Street improvements, including proper s ignaliz anon and signing, will be provided as part of the development. In addition, a trait system will also be constructed that will link with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and regional trail systems. Both of these improvements will substantially improve traffic circulation in the area. lo.f The project site is located adjacent to the proposed Foothill Freeway which could produce noise levels that are potentially dangerous to future residents. A Noise Impact Study was prepared for the project, which recommended site design measures to achieve an acceptable noise environment. These mitigation measures will be incorporated into each level of project design. 12. f.h. i.j.k. The proposed Planned Community will create significant need for the following utility and public services: flood contrcl structures, fire protection, police protection, schools and parks. Storm drain facilities will be constructed as a part of the development. The proposed master • plan includes provision for 16+ acres of open space and park land, including a trail system. The developer has agreed to work with the school district to provide a temporary or permanent school Site, and to pay fees sufficient to provide temporary :lassroom facilities. A potential school site is the acre park site located in the center of the Community. Fire and police protection services are contracted and would require additional funding to expand service to accomodate proposed development. r~~ • RESOLUTION N0. 85-OS A RESOL UTSON OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COhIM IS SI ON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE N0. 84-OS TO PREZONE THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION AS "CAR YN PLANNED COMMUNITY " AND ADOPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR APPROXI h1ATELY 248 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION Of BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH, AND BETWEEN THE EXTE NTI ON OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ON THE EAST AND WEST. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has initiated proceedings for the Change of Organization (annexation) for the above described property pursuant to Section 56195 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California desires to prezone the above described unincorporatd territory pursuant to Section 65859 of the California Government Code; and • WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1985, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and B. That this prez ~~ing will provide for the deve lop~nent of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. C. That this prez ~~ing will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. D. That this prezoning will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities and public services required by development with the District. /zG E. That this prezoning is consistent with the objectives of the • Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. F. This prez ~~ing would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comm ssion has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 9, 1985. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65859 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of January, 1985, of District Change No. 84-OS and Development Plan text. 2. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. • PLANNI yG~C MMIS SIGN OF T}lE C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: X15;,^/• ~ i, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of RanchojCucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNI EL, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • / 4'7 PLANNED COMMUNITY • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BUILDING AND SRFETY , 1. A preliminary soils report shall be filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of the final map. 2. A geology report, prepred by a licensed engineering geologist, shall be filed with and approved by the Building Official. The report shall have been reviewed by a licensed geologist and the costs of such review will be billed to the developer and paid in full prior to recordation of the final map. 3. Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Grading Committee. 4. Obtain a demolition permit for building to be demolished. Underground structures must be broken in, back filled and inspected before covering. 5. Submit plans and obtain building permits for walls. 5. Grading concepts as they relate to maximum slope height and Droperty • line location at the top of slope for Phase II development shall 6e consistent with those approved for Phase I. PUBLIC SERVICES 7. Sewage disposal shall be by connection to Cucamonga County Water District Sewers. 8. The water purveyor shall be Cucamonga County Water District. 9. The following are the steps that must be completed to meet the requirements for installation and/or finance of the on-site/off-site water system and/or sewer system. A. Where the system is to be installed prior to recordation: The water system, fire hydrants, and/or sewer system shall be installed fn accordance with requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, and in accordance with plans approved by the water and/or sewering utility and the governing fire protection authority. The plans shall he reviewed by a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of California, and contain required certificates and approval signatures. It is the developer's resDOnsibility to submit to the Engineering Division a copy of the ~PPisdictionaconfi ming thatnthe improvementfhas Beene installed and accepted. -1- ~ t~ B. Where a bond is to 6e posted in lieu of installation of the improvement: • 1. The domestic water plan and/or sewer plan which meets the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code shall be reviewed by a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of California, and approved by the water or sewering utility and the governing fire protection authority. The plans shall contain the required certificates and approval signatures. A copy of the approved plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Division. 2. Said engineer shall determine the amount of bond necessary to install the improvements. a. This amount plus ten percent shall be posted with the City. A statement signed by the engineer stating that the amount of bond recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation of the improvement shall be included with the estimate and submitted to the City Engineering Division. b. Or, in cases where the water agency or sewering agency is a governmental subdivision, the bond in the amount of 110 percent of the cost of installation of the improvement may be placed with the agency. R signed statement from that agency stating that financial arrangements have been completed shall 6e submitted to the City Engineering • Division. 3. Prior to release of the bond for the improvement, the utility of jurisdiction shall submit a signed statement confirming that the improvement has been installed and meets the requirements of all appropriate State and Ccunty laws pertaining to such improvement. It is the developer's responsibility that such signed statement is filed with the City Engineering Division. 10. An acoustical study shall be performed to assess noise levels at the development and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to recordation. Detailed noise analysis and precise mitigation measures shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to recordation. The acoustical study will be based on available profile and design data of proposed route 30 plan at the time of tentative map approval. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a report stating that the recommended mitigation measures have been implemented shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the building plans shall be so certified by the acoustical engineer. 11. Any abandoned wells on the property or similar structures that might result in contamination of underground waters shall be destroyed in a manner approved by the County Department of Environmental Health Services. 12. A11 building construction shall be designed and built to 45 d8(A) . interior sound attenuation level. _p. r' -' • 13. Use of village perimeter masonry fencing along Milliken Avenue and the south property line to provide privacy and noise shielding. An approximately 8 foot high masonry wall or combination 8 foot high berm and masonry wall will be provided per approval of an acoustical engi neer prior to recordation of first tract. The wall can be less than 8 feet high if noise levels do not exceed 45 d8(A) Ldn interior, 65 d8(A) Ldn exterior. If the barrier is greater than 8 feet, then a berm wil l be used to make up the height greater than 8 feet where grades permit. FIRE PROTECTION 14. Prior to recordation of the first tract, the following shalt be accomplished: A. Fire flow requirements shall be 1,750 g.p.m. B. Fire hydrant spacing shall be 400 feet. C. The Caryn Company shall contribute proportionally ;based upon impact) to the construction of a fire station facility, and the manning of the fire station for the first year. D. The Caryn Company shalt contribute proportionally (based upon impacts) to the purchase of fire equipment (apparatus to man said station). . E. Adhere to all standard Foothill Fire District conditions. 15. The above-referenced project is protected by the Foothill Fire Protection District. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel, the owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire protection development requirements. 16. All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the Uniform Fire Code. 17. The street address shall be pasted with a minimum of three (3) inch numbers, visible from the street, prior to occupancy. 18. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark arrester. An approved spark arrester shall mean a device constructed of stainless steel, aluminum, copper or brass, woven galvanized wire mesh. nineteen (19) gauge minimum with three-eighths (3/8) inch minimum to one-half (1/2) inch maximum openings, mounted in or over all outside flue openings in a vertical or near vertical position, adequately supported to prevent movement and visible from the ground. 19. All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet. -3- /o~ 20. Development ;hall provide for safe and ready access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle • evacuations. 21. An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings if the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%). Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. 22. Roadways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of thirteen feet six inches (13' 6"). 23. A turnaround shall 6e provided at the end of each roadway, and shall be approved by the fire department. 24. All fire fiow requirements are over and above the average daily consumption of water, and the minimum residual pressure shall be twenty (20) psi. 25. The required fire flow shall be determined 6y appropriate calculations, using the latest edition of the Insurance Services Office (ISO), "Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow". 26. The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required. 27. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the off isite • tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 28. All lots should drain to streets. If lots do not drain to streets, the cross-iot drainage will 6e reviewed and approved by the Grading Committee. ENG [NEERING 29. Adequate Drainage Easements (Minimum twelve (12) feet wide) shall be provided over the natural drainage courses and/or drainage facilities. The easements shall be designed to contain the 100-year frequency storm flow plus bulking and freeboard per County Flood Control Standard Criteria. 30. Milliken Avenue shall be designed as a water-carrying street and its water carrying capacity shall be maintained. 31. Adequate rolls shall be provided on the entrance roads to the site at Milliken Avenue to minimize the possibility of street flow entering the site. 32. Lots adjacent to water-carrying streets shall be adequately elevated above the top of curb, or block walls proof ded, or both, to mfn imize the • possibility of street flows entering the lots. -4- 5i • 33. in addition to the Ora inage Requirements stated herein, other "on-site" or "off-site" improvements may be required whi^_h cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office. 34. The conceptual drainage plan has been approved by the City Engineer. Conditions 34 to 39 and 49 and 50 refer to and are intended to implement the conceptual drainage plan. 35. The protective berm shown on Phase 2 shall be extended to preclude the additional sheet overflows from the west from entering the parcel. 36. Temporary and permanent drainage improvements will be required per the developer's engineer's drainage plan, dated April 6, 1984, to intercept and conduct the larger drainage flows through the site in an approved manner. Note: Design criteria call for a minimum pipe size of 18 inch diameter. 37. The proposed interceptor channel and levee within the County Flood Control District rights-of-way north of the proposed development shall be realigned such that flows will not be intercepted at right angles and the channel has a minimum slope of 1 I/2X or greater. The channel shall be designed to contain 100-year storm flows plus bulking and free~oard per County Standard Criteria. • 38. The proposed interceptor channel shali dewater into phase 2 approximately 500 feet east of the west phase 2 boundary. 39. A debris basin shad be provided at the inlet of the proposed conduit which will conduct khe tributary flows through phase 2. 40. Of a QIO closed conduit system is to be used to conduct the tributary flows thh rough the site, the developer's engineer shall show the overflow path for the differential flow (Q 100 - QIp) through the development on appropriate mapping prior to clearance by the Engineering Division. 41. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the County Flood Control District assuming maintenance, operation, and liability responsihiiit ies associated with the proposed interceptor levee(s), channel(s), conveyance facilities, and debris basin(s). In addition, the agreement shall address the timing and cost of levee and channel removal (at the developer's expense) when the need for same no longer exists. 42. 100-year storm flows tributary to and from the site shall be conducted to Day Creek Basin in compliance with the Day Creek System Plan. 43. The developer shall have this site annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Community Facilities District No. 84-1 for the improvement _ of the Day Creek System. The District has been formed under the Me11o- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. -5- ," ~- 44. Day Creek Basin shall be improved to the satisfaction of County Flood Control Distr i.:t as shown in Bill Mann and Associates' "Report on the • Day, Etiwanda, and San Sevaine Creeks System Drainage Plan". If the excavation shown in the plan is not adequate to maintain or reduce the peak flow rates from Day Creek into Riverside County, then adequate excavation of Wineville or Riverside Basin shall be accomplished. Sufficient excavation (storage capacity) must be created by the developer/owner to accept the incremental increase in volume produced by a 100-year storm and volume of water produced by 100-year storm after development is fully built out. This reference is to excavate sufficient capacity to accommodate each phase as that phase is begun. Any cost will be credited to Me11o-Roos up to 100X. 45. A permit will be required far any encroachment or construction of drainage facilities on Flood Control District right-of-way, and a minimum of six (6) weeks processing time should be allowed. 46. Minimum paved width access road to Highland Avenue other than required above shall be 40 feet for a distance of 100 feet north of the intersection with Highland Avenue. 41. The project parkway road shall be designed and constructed to modified local road standards satisfactory to the City Engineering Division as shown in the approved Planned Community text. 48. Retention will be provided to decrease the developed peak flows into Day Creek to an acceptable amount as determined by County Flood Control • Department. 49. Both Phase I and Phase [I will be protected from a 100-year storm as determined by criteria established by the City Engineering Division. 50. Site development will not incrementally add to the velocity, magnitude or concentrations of runoff affecting downstream properties except into facilities approved by County Flood Control. 51, Drainage from the project site (Phases I and II) shall be directed to Day Creek, there shall not be any release of flows into the Deer Creek Channel. 52. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights-of- way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 53. Oed ication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the fnl lowing streets: 67-IS additional feet on Milliken 33 additional feet on Banyan 3 additional feet on Rochester 54. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited ta, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewlk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. Requirement of sidewalk • will be governed by the provision of the Planned Community text. -6- r43 • 55. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. 56. Any grading within the road right-of-way prior to the signing of the improvement plans shall be accomplished under the direction of a Soil Testing Engineer. Cuiopaction tests of embankment construction, trench backf ill, and all subgrades shall be performed at no cost to City of Rancho Cucamonga and a written report shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to any placement of bass materials and/or paving. 57. final plans and profiles shall indicate the location of any existing utility facility which would affect construction. 58. Slope rights shall be dedicated on the final tract map where necessary. 59. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 60. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated on Banyan, Milliken, and Rochester and along the rear of double frontage lots. 61. Existing city street requiring reconstruction shall remain open for traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction or street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded on • completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 62. All street names shall be coordinated with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. 63. Prior to any work heing performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 64. An encroachment permit shall be required from the State Department of Transportation prior to any construction within their right-of-way. 65. Road improvement plans as applicable to this Droj ect for Highland Avenue shall be submitted to the State Department of Transportation by a registered civil engineer. 66. In accordance with the policy of preserving freeway corridors crossing subdivisions, right-of-way adequate for construction of State Highway 30 shall be preserved along this project's frontage. All future tentative tract maps and final development plan maps shall reflect this. 67. Any change to this project as currently proposed, which may be necessitated by the State Department of Transportation recommendations, must be incorporated prior to recordation of the Final Map. 7- 68. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to recording of the map • or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 69. Existing utility poles shall be shown on Lhe improvement plans and relocated as necessary without cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 70. In the event developer fails to acquire the required offsite property intrests, the developer shall, prior to approval of the final map, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by developer Of all costs incurred by City t0 acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developer's cast. The appraiser shall have been approved by City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 71. Right of way and improvements (including off-site) to trans iti0n traffic and drainage flows from proposed to existing, shall be required as necessary. 72. The two points of vehicular ingress and egress to the City or State Maintained Road System shalt be provided to each phase. 13. Minimum spacing between intersections on local streets shall be not less • than 150 feet, and on major and secondary highways not less than 1/4 mile. 74. Milliken Avenue shall be designed and constructed half-width to major divided highway standards as requested by the City of Rancho Cucamonga - 1/2 of a six-lane divided road. A paving width of 40 feet with A.C. berms shall be permitted on Milliken Avenue between Highland Avenue and Spine Road. 75. The developer shall be required to reserve the right of way necessary for construction of the future Foothill Freeway. This will include interchanges and/or proposed grade separations. The developer shall coordfnate with Caltrans as necessary to establish this right of way and shall show it on the maps. 76. Access to existing homes shall be acknowledged in this design. 77. Coordination with Metropolitan Water District shall be effected by the developer as necessary. 78. Access to Flood Control District saleable property north of project shall be incorporated into this design layout. C -8- 79. Subject to City Engineer's approval, temporary access connections to Highland Avenue shall require Caltrans approval and shall require a cash • deposit to cover cost of later removal. This cash deposit shall also include cost of design and construction of those portions of the tract perimeter roads outside of State right-of-way. 80. Banyan and Rochester shall be designed and constructed half-width to Collector Road Standards - 1/2 of a two-lane undivided road (26 feet minimum width), subject to temporary construction through future freeway right-of=way as approved by City Engineer. 81. Highland Avenue shall be improved as necessary to provide a 44 foot paved surface at the tract access points to provide for left turn lanes. Interim spot improvements shall provide for left and right turns. 82. Fifty foot street right-of-ways being proposed for this project have been identified and satisfactory suhst antiation has been provided to the adequacy of these 50 foot streets. 83. Prior to recordation, the developer shall submit for approval a traffic study indicating the on-site and off-site impacts on Highland Avenue, on Haven Avenue, and on Milliken with appropriate mitigation measures. The developer's fair share cash contribution toward mitigation shall 6e 535,000. The contribution shall be paid to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on a per lot basis. • 84. Lots 333 through 350 shall not be developed until elimination of the temporary secondary access. 65. Access to Caltrans' property shall be accomplished by using the already existing 20 foot road easement to Highland Avenue, provided this is properly recorded, or by making Lot P adjacent to cul-de-sac W, public right of way. 86. The knuckles, cul-de-sacs, and curb radii shown on the map shall conform to Planned Community text. 81. Fi11 slope within Caltrans property shall be approved by Caltrans. 88. Project parkway shall be developed to a standard of 2+ lanes (varies). 89. Project Loop Road shall be developed to a standard of 2+ travel lanes. 90. Two inbound and two outbound lanes shall 6e provided on the project parkway at the Milliken Avenue intersection. 91. The development plans shall provide for preservation of right-of-way for the Foothill Freeway (future Route 30). Over 23 acres along the southern boundary of the site will be reserved within Phase I and II; this location is consistent with the freeway corridor alignment adopted by Caltrans. 92. This project shall he annexed to or shall form a 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District. A11 costs associated with the formation of alighting and Landscaping Assessment District shall be paid by the developer(s). 9- PLANNING • 93. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any phase of the project, all plans required for that phase shall he approved and the phase of the tract to which the permit has been applied for shall be recorded. Approval for this Planned Community shall be for a period of fifteen (15) years from the date of Cf ty Council action. The applicant shall file a development plan for at least one phase of the project within five (5) years of this approval and within each succeeding five (5) year period. Extensions of time may be granted. Extensions of time must be submitted in writing to the Planning Division at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. Grading and model home permits may be issued prior to recordation, subject to compliance with standard City conditions. 94. The Planned Community text shall be modified as follows: A. Under Project Tabulations, the overall density shall be calculated deleting the following: (a) the northeast corner parcel at Milliken and Highland (Not a Part); and (b) property for the Foothill Freeway. B. Under Development Regulations and Standards, 2(b)(1), a statement shall be added which states, "The lot sizes north of the parkway shall vary from 5,500 - 11,000 square feet, with an average of approximately 7,100 square feet, and the lot sizes south of the . parkway shall vary from 4,000 - 10,000 square feet, with an average of approximately 5,000 square feet. Combined average of approximately 6,250. The percentage of the number of average sized lots shall be provided. C. Under Development Regulations and Standards, Section 2(h)(2) shall be changed to read, "building site width shall vary depend tng an lot size". 0. A statement shall be added under Development regulations which states that lot ratio shall not exceed 3:1. E. Under Development Regulations and Standards 2(bj(3), "Building site coverage" shall be changed to "Total Impervious Area: 60X maximum". F. A statement shall be added under Development Regulations which states variable front yard setbacks shall be provided with a minimum of 18 feet from property line. 95. The landscaped buffer between residential and commercial uses shall be 15 feet. The buffer shall be installed on the abutting commercial property at time of its development. 96. Park area totaling 7 acres shall be provided prior to final bulldout of second phase. C~ -10- r' 97. The applicant shall submit the following information to the City far • their review in accordance to the Planned Community Residential Development Review procedure requirements for Planning Commission approval. A. Tentative tract map. B. Conceptual grading map. C. Conceptual building site plan. D. Conceptual landscape plan showing landscaping and design for all trails, open spaces, walls, street tree planting, slope planting. E. Architectural elevations of all building types. F. Tabulation of the following: 1. Open space area 2. Building coverage 3. Unit areas 4. Number of units • 5. Total site area 6. Proposed density G. Plans for all signs. No free standing signs will be permitted except for monument signs, temporary signs, on-site signs, sales, sold and direction signs in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. 98. Prior to recordation of any tract map, final details/plans of Items A-G shall be included in final plan for staff review. 99. On a phased basis, all areas identified as open space shall possess no residential development rights since said development rights have been transferred to other portions of the prof ect. The method of retaining open space shall 6e agreed upon by the developer and City prior to the recordation of the first tract map for each affected phase. 100. Existing ornamental or native trees shall be retained when possible. Trees to remain shall be identified on the Grading Plan. 101. The final tract map for the first development phase for each parcel in Phase I shall record the order of the phasing plan, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 102. All recreational facilities shall have two points of access, one of which may be emergency only. 103. The conditions outlined in the approved Geologic Report shall become conditions of this project. -11- ~G7 104. Persons purchasing property subject to noise levels of 65 Ldn or greater . due to the proposed Foothill Freeway shall be informed of said noise levels. 105. All financial arrangements shall be made to provide water, sewer, maintenance, etc., prior to the recordation of the first final development tract map. 106. Provide a flat useable yard open space excluding graded slopes, building footprints and driveway with a 15 foot minimum distance between buildings and break of slope, or to work with the staff to develop specific performance standards far minimum yard areas for useable private open space. 107. The Planned Community shall contain a maximum of 902 dwelling units. The aforementioned maximum does not include out-parcels or currently owned state right-of-way as shown on Exhibit 3, page 4 of text. 108. Graded slopes will be constructed at slope ratios no steeper than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical, that they be kept to reasonable vertical heights, and that they be planted with suitable landscaping per City standards. A vertical height limit for graded slopes adjacent to residential development shall be shown within the final grading plan and consistent with Planned Community text. 109. The project site is within the jurisdiction of the West End Resource Conservation District, consequently, water, paving and revegetat ion and • other dust control measures shall be used to minimize fugitive dust generation. 110. The project will provide a minimum of 3.0 acres of park/1000 population. 111. If the sc haol site is combined with the park, the minimum site shall be 13 acres. This requirement may be adjusted to design approval by the Et iwanda School District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Oeve lopment Department. This cond it ton will be necessary if the school is established as a full-sized facility. 112. Preferably the entire park site should be developed during the first phase; however, if phased development fs necessary the park area within the First Phase should provide for a minimum play field of not less than 3.5 acres. 113. Prior to recordation of any tract maps, a "will serve" letter will be required from affected school districts. Phase [I development will not proceed until adequate capacity exists for students generated by the development. • -12- /aa Tentative Tract 12642 January 9, 1985 Page #2 (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12642, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the attached conditions; APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST [, Rick :Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES; COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHITiEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NONE NONE • • • '],J~ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 12642 Page 3 r 1 L.J BUIL DIAG AND SAFETY 1. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work and submitted to the City Building Official. 2. Grading plans to be submitted to and approved by Building and Safety Division. As required by Lownes geologic reports of May 20, 1983 and March 21, 1964, Earth Research report of January 23, 1964 and Douglas E. Moran review comments dated April I1, 1984, additional geotechnical work required prior to approval of grading plans. 3. Grading of the subject property shall he in accordance with the Uniform Building Cade, City Grading Standards, or as modified on the conceptual grading plan approval and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual • grading plan. 4. Obtain a demolition permit for building to be demolished. Underground structures must be hrok en in, hack filled and inspected before covering. 5. Submit plans and obtain building permits for all walls over 6' in height. 6. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. 7. Prior to issuance of building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant sha 11 pay the necessary development fees as per the Rnnexation Agreement. 8. Street addresses shall be provided by the City Building Official. 9. A geology report, prepared by a licensed engineering geologist, shall be filed with and approved by the 8u ilding Official. The report wilt be reviewed by a licensed geologist and the costs of such review will be billed to the developer and shall be paid in full prior to recordation of the final map. As required by Lownes geologic reports of May 20, 1983 and March 21, 1984, Earth Research report of January 23, 1984 and Douglas E. Moran review comments dated April 11, 1984, additional geotechnical work required prior to approval of grading plans. 103 Conditions of Rpproval Tentative Tract 12642 Page 4 • PUBLIC SERVICES 1. Temporary secondary access, as shown on the tentative maD. shall be eliminated if Milliken Ave, G Street, Banyan Street to G Street, Spine Street and both Loop streets are paved to all-weather standards. 2. Sewage disposal shall be by connection to Cucamonga County Water District sewers. 3. The water purveyor shall be Cucamonga County Water District. 4. The following are the steps that must be completed to meet the requirements for installation and/or finance of the on-site/off-site water system and/or sewer system: A. Where Lhe system is to be installed prior to recordation: The water system, fire hydrants, and/or sewer system shall be installed in accordance with requirements of the State Health and Safety Cade, and in accordance with plans approved by the water and/or sewering utility and the governing fire protection authority. The plans shall be reviewed by a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of California, and contain required certificates and approval signatures. It is the developer's • responsibiity to submit to the City Engineer, a copy of the approved plan and a signed statement from the utility of jurisdiction confirming that the improvement has been installed and accepted. B. Where a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of the improvement: 1. The domestic water plan and/or sewer plan which meets the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code shall be reviewed by a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of California, and approved by the water or sewering utility and the governing fire protection authority. The plans shall contain the required certificates and approval signatures. A copy of the approved plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer. 2. Said engineer shall determine the amount of bond necessary to install the improvements. a. This amount plus ten percent shall be posted with the City. A statement signed by the engineer stating that the amount of bond recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation of the improvement shall be included with the estimate and submitted to the City Engineer. • a:~+ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 12642 page 5 Or, in cases where the water agency or sewering agency is a governmental subdivision, the bond in the amount of 110 percent of the cast of installation of the improvement may be placed with the agency. A signed statement from that agency stating that financial arrangements have been completed shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Prior to release of the bond for the improvement, the utility of jurisdiction shall submit a signed statement confirming that the improvement has been installed and meets the requirements of all appropriate State and Ccunty laws pertaining to such improvement. It is the developer's responsibility that such signed statement is filed with the City Engineer. 5. An acoustical study shall be performed to assess noise levels at the development and shall be reviewed and approved 6y the Planning Division prior to map recordation. Detailed noise analysis and precise mitigation measures shall be submitted tc the Planning Division for review and approval prior to recordation. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a report stating that the recommended mitigation measures have been implemented, shall be submitted to the Planning • Division and the building plans shall be so certified by the acoustical engineer. Acoustical studies shall be based on available profile and design data of proposed Route 30 at the time of tentative map approval. 6. All existing easements lying within future city street right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or to be delineated on the map per City Enginezr's requirements. 7. Street Improvement plans including street tights prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of all existing utility facilities within the right-or-way. 8, Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 9. Emergency access if required shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 10. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection systems. 11. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. ~~~ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 12642 Page 6 • 12. Permits from the: San Bernardino County Dust Abatement District may be required prior to issuance of a grading permit. PLANNING 1. Development/Design Review shall be accomplished prior to Annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Planned Community Text and where applicable, Development Code regulations. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Final site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All final site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and • street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading permit, tree removal, encroachment, building permits, etc.) prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable community plans or specific plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance which have not been addressed either by the Planned Community Text or conditions of tentative approval. 6. All lots on the north side of the parkway shall have a minimum area of 5,500 square feet, with a minimum lot width of 50 feet. All lots on the south side of the parkway shall have a minimum area of 4,000 square feet, with a minimum lot width of 45 feet. Minimum width shall 6e measured from mid point of lot. 7. The following are minimum building setbacks: A. Minimum rear yard setback of 5 feet, or 12 feet between structures; (Note condition A108 of the Planned Community Text). B. Minimum side yard setback of 5 feet, or 10 feet between structures: C. Variable front yard building setback with a minimum of 18 feet from • property line. ~ v o Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 12642 Page 7 • D. Minimum street side yard setback of ten (10) feet. A final grading plan shall be required. Said grading plan shall be submitted to the Grading Committee for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots. 9. Street trees shall be provided per phase as illustrated in the Planned Community text and per approved landscape plans. 10. Greenbelt improvements wholly within the tract shall he provided per phase as illustrated in the Planned Community text. The first phase built adjacent to a greenbelt area shall be responsible for landscaping the entire ~.vidth of the greenbelt area adjacent to the subject phase (i.e., phase 3 shall be reponsible for construction the entire width of the greenbelt planned for Lot "G" to 500' south of "Spine Road"). 11. The applicant shall be responsible for constructing 3 1/2 acres of the 7 acre park prior to recordation of Phase 6 of Tentative Tract 12642. q landscape plan shall be approved prior to development of the park. Landscaping shown on plan shall either be improved or bonds posted for their completion. • 12. Equestrian trail adjacent to Banyan Avenue shall be provided per phase and included on landscape plan. 13. Three (3) copies of a landscaping Plan shall he submitted for Planning Division review and approval. Said Landscape Plan shall include the following: A. The required slope for the surface of all slope banks in excess of five (5) vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope landscaped for erosion control as follows: one 15-gallon or larger tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, one gallon larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope in excess of eight (8) feet in vertical height and on greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften slope plane. Maintenance by a Landscape Maintenance District may be required by the Planning Commission on a case-by- case basis for perimeter slopes. B. All decorative walls shall he designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, split block face, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. C. Any existing eucalyptus trees to be retained shall be topped to thirty (30) feet, trimmed along the lower fifteen (15) feet, and cleared of all dead leaves and branches. z~y Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 12642 Page 8 -.~J 14. All slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy far Chose units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. 15. Water and energy conservation techniques are encouraged to be utilized, such as special irrigation techniques (e. g., drip irrigation), drought tolerant plant species, alluvial rocksc ape, etc. 16. Three (3) copies of an irrigation plan shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval when slope planting is required. Slopes required to he planted shall be provided with an approved system of irrigation, designed to cover all portions of the slope. A permanent irrigation system installed by developer is required on all slopes with the exception of those less than 10' when within 50' distance of a hose bib. A functional test of the system may be required. The ma in teneance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenance is officially assumed by a Landscape Maintenance District. All irrigation systems, where required, shall be designed on an individual lot basis unless commonly maintained in an approved manner. • 17. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall 5e included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division and coordinated far consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 18. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed on public right-of-way on the perimeter of this tract area shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City and annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 19. A11 landscaping and irrigation shown on the approved landscape and irrigation plans and all required walls shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their completion. 20. Lighting and Landscape District for the project shall be established for the maintenance and management of the common open space, recreational facilities, and public landscaped areas, and trails. 21. All equestrian trails shall reflect the design standards as shown on tentative map. 22. Parking and outside storage areas should be screened from view, to the maximum extent feasible. Screening should be accomplished by utilizing existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings. • ~ /S Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 12642 Page 9 23. Approval will be granted by the City Planner for the creation of two, three or four lots as shown on the approved tentative subdivision far the purpose of obtaining building permits for model homes or units. Prior to issuance of building permits for said model homes, a surety bond or cash deposit shall be posted with the County Transportation Department for the street improvements abutting said lots as required for the approved tentative subdivision. The surety bond or cash deposit shall he in an amount equal to a contractor's construction estimate plus ten percent. Applicant is permitted four model homes per phase. 24. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewerage system, water, electric power, gas and telephone in accordance with utility standards. 25. Installation of any Cable TV service shall be coordinated by the developer with the cable service Drovider to coincide with trenching for utilities. 26. All utilities within the project shall he installed underground including utilities along major arteriais 12 KV and less. 27. Utility easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the serving • utility companies and the City Engineer. 28. Developer shall he responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 29. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City Standards. 30. Approvals have not keen secured from ill itll'~I. ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' agencies involved. Approval of the final map will he subject to avy requirements that may be received from them. 31. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City Standards and procedures. 32. The conditions of the planned community as contained in Ordinance shall apD ly where applicable. 33. The recommendations of the approved Geologic Report shall become conditions of this project. 34. Detailed park improvement plans, including grading, lands~.aping and irrigation, shall be submitted for approval by the Community Services Director. 35. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. Zi: Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 12642 Page 10 • 36. A separate landscape and irrigation plan per City Standard for the parkway and/or median 9andscaping to be maintained by the City shall be required for review and approval by t5e City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 37. Maximum slope height is twenty (20) feet. 38. Final grading plans shall be prepared in accordance with Ordinance 118 and shall include details of the retention basin, subject to the conditions of approval of the Planned Community Development Plan. • C~ 7 ~. ~/a - ORDINANCE N0. "T--o--1v° 'ro AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, DEVELOPMENT D[S TRI CT CHANGE N0. 84-05 TO PREZONE THE DISTRICT OESI GNATION AS "CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY" AtiO ADOPT THE DEVELOPMENT PLRN FOR APPROXI MRTELY 248 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF BANYAN RVEtIUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORTH ANO SOUTH, RNO BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF ROCHESTER RVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ON THE EAST Rt10 WEST. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California has initiated proceedings far the Change of Organization (annexation) for the above described property pursuant to Section 56195 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamang a, California, desires to prezone the above-descrihed unincorporated territory pursuant to Section 65859 of the California Government Cade. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1; The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: • q. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the prezoning of the above descrihed properties to "Caryn Planned Community" as defined in the attached Development Plan Text and its Conditions of Approval which are by this reference made a part hereof, and that this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duiy heard and considered said recommendation. B. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in Cerms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and C. That this prezoning will provide for the development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise ailowab le under alternate reguiatf ons, ;~ i d City Council Ordinance Page q2 D. That this prezoning will provide for development within • the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. E. That this prezoning will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities and public services required by development with the District. F. That this prezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. G. This prezoning would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: The above described real property is hereby prezoned in the mannner stated, and the development district map is herehy amended accordingly. Further, the development of said property shall be regulated by the adopted Development Plan text and its Conditions of Approval and in part by the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. SECTION 3: That the prezoning shall become effective at the same time that the annexation becomes effective pursuant to Section 65859 of the California Government Cade. u PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. M1 a s, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authelet, City C erk • ~;7 - M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lduren M. Wasserman, City Manager FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City t\t for hey DATE: January 8, 1965 - RE: Ordinance Pertaining to the Equipping and Marking of Non- Emeryency Medical Transportation Vehicles Per Richard Dahl's request I am enclosing a draft of ail Ordinance entitled "An Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, evnending Title B of the P,ancho Cucamonga Municipal Code by adding Chapter 6.20 Thereto Pertaining to the Equipping and Mark- ing of ion-Emergency Medical Transportation Veh is l.es". . RED:sjo Enclosure ~ ;iG ORDINANCE N0. L Y ~I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, GALI:'ORNIA, AMENDING TITLE B OF THE RANCHO CDCAMONGA MINICI PAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 8.20 1HERETO PERTAINING TD THE EQOIIPING AND MARRING OF NON-EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTA PION VEPICLES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain ee fol love: SECTION I: Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mum icipal Code ie hereby amended by adding Chapter 8.20 [hereto to read ae follows: Chapter 8.20 NON-ENERCENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES Sec[ione• 8.20.010 Equipment and Narking Restric[ione • 8.20.010 Eau foment and Mark inn Restrictions Ic shall be unlawful for any person [o operate a vehicle, or engage in the business of operating a vehicle, upon the streets or say public way or place in the City for the purpose of tranepor[ing sick, injured, wounded, invalid, convalescent, or otherw lee incapcita [ed persona, or expected mothers a. which ie equipped with emergency signaling devices (ouch ae red light and siren), or b. which bears the work "ambulance" or the word "emergency" thereon, unless such vehicle ie authorized by the local EMS agency to provide EMT-I, ENT-LI or EMI-P rescue or ambulance eery i<e e. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same co be published within fifteen (15) days of ter its pe wage at lees[ once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation publ iehed in the City of Oaterio, Cal iforn ie, end circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED th is 16th day of January, 1985. I , U 12/ n rmv nc n • Tir'trn l'~i ih A TanAi/! A STAFF REPORT ~~ ~9. Y T III" 9 19i' • DATE; January 16, 1985 T0: Mayor and Memhere of City Council FROM: Laut en M. Wasserman, City Manager ,~ -~' SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION FROM CITY MANACI.R TO FORM ADMINISTRATIVE TASA FORCE TO DETERMINE REOIIIREMENTS POR AMEDLANCE SERVICES Since [he City Council"s last coneiderat ion of a comprehensive ordinance regular ing the ambulance industry, it has come to fhe attention of the City Manager that there are, in fact, some problems with the levels of service being provided. In addition, it is importeot that the City take into consideration changes in the Slate Lave vhiah gov era ambulance ae rv ices. These nev laws were effective on January 1, 1985. RECOMMENDATION I[ is recommended chat [he City Council ae ergs a Taek Force cone rating of the Ci[y Manager, the Captain of the Rancho Cucamonga Sher if E'e substation, and the Chief of the Foothill Pire 6ietricf, to research the prob lame and report back to the City Council vith a recommendation. It ie anticipated [het the Task Force recommendations can be eubm iCted to [he Ci[y Council for consideration at your Council meecing of Pebruary 20, 1985. Reaps c[Eully submit cad, Lauren M. Nas aeiman City Manager LMN/kep 2 2 .^- rtmv nc DAArr'kin CTiCdMnNRA _. v~u... • STAFF REPORT GATE: January 16, 1985 T0: Mayor end Nembers of Ci[y Council FAOM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager SUBJECT: ASSISTANT PARR PLANNER ~.r° v ~, ~( 9 D 1977 IC is zecommended that the Cicy Council consider author ix ing an additional po ai[ion of Aea ietanf Yark Planner beginning in April, 1985. Salary range for the position is 51878 through SZ410. The recommendation is based upon the fact [hat at the present time Che City has a number of park development ac[iv itiefl in the planning and construction siege e. LC is esaent ial that City personnel routinely inape ct each job ae is is being co net rust ed. This reaponsibil ity is nay fiandled entirely by the Park Project Coordinator. There is simply Goo much vork for a single employee to handle. Normally, reque ets of Chia nature ere extremely rare dot ing the mid-year point of our budget cycle. Hovey er, since there is a Brea[ de ai of time required far recruitment of personnel, the Cicy Gould benefit greatly if the employee were to be Aired by April of 1985. if ve wait for the regu let budge[ cycle the nev employee you ld not 6e av ail ab ie until approxime rely October. I[ is in the beet interest of the Cicy to have efficient and thorough job-site inape scion. We have canside red other alternatives, such as contracting, use of interns, of hiring of part-time employees, hovever, eheae do no[ meet [Re needs of [he City. TAe financial impact o£ Chia recommender ian is a cos[ to Che City of approximately $I 2,000.00, including salary end fringe benefits. Tt is recommended that [Ain sum be appropt rated from additional revenue shat ing funds that we have received aad had not anticipated. Pull annual funding will be included in Che 1985-86 Progra of Service. Authorization is reque a[ed to begin recto itmeu[ for an Aea iatan[ Park Planner position to be filled no earl iet [Ann April, 1985. Ae epe<tfully submitted, Lauren M. Wasserman City Nsnager l.llW/kep i~3 VL11 VL' L\L11Y V 11V VVIiA t\I V LYVA GV~+.~YI (~ MEMORANDUM ~~' ~, ,,v ,~, ~,'~ '' DATE: January 15, 1985 ~__ ' 1 19•. T0: Mayor and ;1embers of the until FRCM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Plann r SUBJECT: MASTER PLANS - A clarification of the City's 'Raster Plan process t The purpose of this memo is to clarify the intent and application of the Master Plan process. The purpose of the Master Ptan process is to recogn ize the special needs or ch ar ac ter ist its of certain areas designated 6y the Generai Plan. Therefore, Che Master Plan process goes beyond traditional zoning regulations by relating to the characteristics of a specific neighborhood area. Through the Master Pian process, a proposed project's design is tailored to the character and needs of a defined neighborhood; whereas, traditional zoning regulations apply a uniform set of design standards to a broader area. To illustrate the Master Plan role in the design review process, consider the area west of Chaffey College. The area is characterized by a mixture of parcels of differing sizes under separate ownership, moderately steep grade and drainage problems. The Master Plan process provided a method to address these unique characteristics allowing streets to be master planned to provide equitable access to ail parcels (some of which were landlocked). In addition, a drainage system was developed to safely convey neighborhood storm runoff to collection has ins. In terms of housing product type, the Master Plan process may be used to assure compatibility with the existing neighborhood character through comparable Droduct type. Therefore, product types relate to neighborhood compatibility. The appropriate density for a specific site in any residential district is determined through the review process and public hearings based upon careful analysis of the constraints or opportunities of each site, In conclusion, the (Raster Plan review technique is used in conjunction with the attached Design Gu ideiines and Absolute Policies which govern all residential dev elapment. RG:DC:jr Attachments a~4 ~~ (,C~'I~ GENE ~SIGI.( ~jUlDFL/N~`~ „ ~,. r 11. Transition of Dens ity._ The site plan iheerFd consider ' compatibility with surrounding neighborhood through providing proper transition of density, partic~tarly on in- _ fill sites adjacent to lower densities. Como ar able densities, ooen space buffer zones, increased setbac'~<s and architectural compatibility are encouraged along common boundaries to provide proper transition of density. Clustering units can Drovide large open sD ace areas as a buffer. 12. Street lesion. Vary street pattern to reduce ~tron~tsyapa monocon Curvilinear streets, cul-de-sacs, landscaping, and single-loaded streets are encouraged to provide streets cane variety and visual interest, particularly in the Low-Medium District. 13. House ?lotting. Clustering houses around common open space, zer~ne, reverse plotting, angling house to the street, and side entry garages may be permitt=d if they provide stree tscaoe variety and visual interest, particularly in the Loa-Medium District. SECTION 3: The following sections of Section 17.08.090-D are hereby amended to read as follows: i. ~`-~_" 2. Architecture. The architecture ~shuwld consider ~~ compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, farm, size, color, material and roof line. Individual dwelling units should 6e distinguishable from one another and have separate entrances. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to a 6uitding's character while aiding' in climate control. Further, changes in the roof level or planes provide architectural interest. In particular, low-Med i'dm density residential development should be designed with upgraded architecture through increased delineation of surface treatment and architectural details. The architectural concept should also complement the grading and toDOgraphy of the site. !-i w{ 3. Scale. The mass and scale of the building shed:M be proportionate to the site, open sD aces, street locations and surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale, Multiple family product type (i.=., apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adjacent to tower density single family areas. Ail attached projects adjacent to existing one-story single family deve iopments shall be one story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the C ex i5t ing one-story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on prfvacy, views, and general comp atibitity. ~~.> Sectior. 17.08.050 D. Public Health Sc Safety • 1. The Project lies within, or partially within, an adopted "Special Studies Zone"; a geologic report has been submitted which locates the presence or P~~,~'. ~i • absence of actual fault traces in accordance with the provisions of the ' J Aiquist-Priolo Act, and special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those -iimitations or these areas have been set aside from development. 2. The Project lies within areas subject to geologic hazards (i.e., slopes greater than X046, slope instability, soil erosion, ground failure), as identified in Figures V-1 and V-3 of the General Plan; an adequate geologic or soils engineering investfgation has been submitted, end special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations or these areas have been set aside from development. 3. The Project lies within areas of Tujunga-Delhi soH association which may have soil bearing capabilities that could limit development, as identified in Figure V-2 of the General Plan, an adequate soils engineering investigation has been submitted which indicates the soils can adequately support the weight of the structure. 4. The Project is not on public sewers end lies within areas of Friant Escondido and Ramona/Arlington soil associations which may not be suitable for on-site wastewater disposal, es identified in Figure V-2 of the General Plan, an adequate site specific investigation has been submitted that demonstrates • the soils ere suitable end the disposal of waste water will not degrade the lit f r ace water qua y. subsur S. The Project is located within a flood hazard area, as identified in Figure V-5 oC the General Plan, and special construction features have been incorporated into the design of structures. 6. The Project is located within a fire hazard area, as identified in Figure V-6 of the General Plan; a program for interim fuel management has been included to reduce the risk of [ire, and fire mitigation measures (e.g., fire resistant building materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc.) have been incorporated into the project design per the requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 7. All projects shell be within a seven (7) minute response time from a fire protection facility. If the project is not within that response time, then provisions must be made with the Foothill Fire Protection District for adequate fire protection. E. Res ource Protection 1. The Project contains landforms of citywide significance (i.e., foothills defined as having slopes greater than lOti, and Red Hill) end the project has been designed to minimize alteration of the landform through proper site planning, clustering, and following natural contours. 2. The Project is located within a major groundwater recharge area, as identified in Figure IV-2 of the General Plan, and development has been clustered to promote infiltration end to maintain open space. -81- ~~ e Section 17.08.050 8. The Project contains streamside woodland associations, identified as a • significant natural resource in Figure IV-2 of the General Plan, and site investigations have been completed, and mitigation measures proposed (including clustering) to mitigate impacts upon riparian community. 4. The Project is located on a site or contains a structure or other feature which is designated as a historic landmark, end provision has been made for preservation of said landmark in accordance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 5. The Project site is designated by the General Plan as Hillside Residential, and environmental studies have been conducted to determine land holding capacity and site development constraints, and the proposed density is no greater than two wits per net buildable acre. 6. The Project site is designated by the General Plan as Open Space, and development has been concentrated to preserve open space, and the proposed density is no greater than an average density o[ one wit per 40 acres. 7. The Project promotes energy efficiency through the use of energy efficient building design (e.g., south facing windows, energy conserving building materials and appliances, etc.) and site planning (e.g., east-west aligned units, landscaping for solar access, etc.). / F. Land Use Conflicts • L The matrix in Table 17.08.090-F indicates the conflicts that ere presumed to exist between land uses.. The types o[ mitigation measures listed in the following sections ere the design tools that should be employed either separately or in combination to mitigate existing or potential ]and use conflicts. The Absolute Policies require that such conflicts be effectively mitigated in the project design. 1. Land Use Conflict Mitigation ?Aeesures (e) O en S ace Setbacks. By providing en open space bufter between con bcting land uses conflicts can often be avoided. The width of the buffer required will depend on the severity of conflict and the extent of landscaping. To work effectively, the ownership, use, and maintenance of the open space buffer must be clearly defined. (b) Landscaoin and To o ra hic Chan es. As part of an open space bu er or as a treatment o land immediately adjacent to buildings, landscaping can be used to reduce conflicts. (c) Dense plantings of evergreens can provide a visual buffer. (1) Sensitive landscaping can soften the sharp visual contrast between two abutting land uses by subduing the differences in architecture and bulk and by providing a gradual transition rather then a harsh edge between uses. L' (2) Dense growth o[ plants can be visually appealing but also can • be used to discourage unwanted and unsafe pedestrian or bicycle access between lend uses, _82_ ~~7 Section 14.08.050 (3) Landscaping can be used in combination with other mitigation measures, such as reducing the width of open space buffer required and soften the visual rnnflict created by safety and security fences. (4) Recontouring of the land can alter views, subdue sounds, reduce glare, change the sense o[ proximity, and channel pedestrian travel. (d) Orientation. The strict spatial proximity between land uses end the apparent or functional proximity can be very different depending on the orientation of buildings and activities in the two land uses. (1) The buildings themselves can cause a buffer to be created by effectively turning their backs on each other - orienting views, access and principal activities away from the other land use. Care must be taken, however, that a hazardous and Unaesthetic "no-mans" land is not created in the process. (Z) Alternately, the intervening space can be eliminated altogether it the two buildings share a common back wall. (3) An entire site plan can be oriented so that the activities and functions are aligned hierarchically - placing those least compatible furthest from the common boundary between land uses and those most compatible near that boundary (i.e., single . story adjacent to single story). (e) Barriers end Alleviation. [t may be appropriate and necessary to use physical barriers to prevent the undesirable attributes of one land use from affecting Ne people and activities in the adjacent land use. {1) Fences, walls and berms can prevent the passage of people into areas [hat would be unsafe or insecure. (Z) Light and noise can also be mitigated through physical barriers such as fences, walls, berms, screens and landscaping. (f) Architectural Comoatibility. In addition to the architectural eonsideratfons Involved in mitigation through orientation, the architectural design of buildings can reduce conflict and promote compatibility. Sl) Materials, crolors, scale, end prominence of buildings in adjacent lend uses can be coordinated so there is a gradual transition from one land use to another rather then a sharp end displeasing contrast. Purely aesthetic details that are "tacked" onto a building to cover up land use conflicts, however, will cause mcre harm then good. (Z} The architectural compatibility should rise from a total consideration of the function of each land use and the Function of the space between them. -83- 2~d Section 17.08.050 (g) Circulation. Streets and parking areas can often serve to reduce • certain types of lend use conflicts. Separation of conflicting uses with a street or parking area can provide a buffer. TABLE 17.08.090-P -LAND USE CONFLICTS L ....•...M..L.•~•~~~•• Land Use Conflicts .,.~ ~~L.,.....,~ M4.n LuN YM. O i.... ..rt wnv...uq.w .~;CeS C` ~.Onf!!C'S n d o or;~grr. v, cse.c L d U ° c ~,"r'°°°'" an ses ; ° ~ rh n ~ ~ ~ a oes e cs acre ~ecreccon ;~,_,' Q c c y ~ Pnvccy ~S ~ ^ ~ e ' O Resceni~ ei O ~ CCC°SS ~ ~ ~ L- ~ G Mcce•are ~ :~ '~ 'r~ VY N y perry ~ o ~ o ~ k _ C r~yh J-^, ~,!y ~ i I s ~ ~ ~ i^St '~f~~.O nci ~ C i x ' ~ <L '~ 9 O U c E Cor-rrercc~ x ~~I " ~''_- ~ - O V srna !rc - i ! _ . ~ ~ ., I 1// Rc r ,cd p L y irk ^ Ors J _ . _ iii ~~ are• ,, Srree~ ~~ ~ -84- 2~Y ~v,nui,iVUUi, -,rvn~. ..., a...r n-." ~...,.-. ,...e ........... ...... Sestlm 17.0!.050 ADeoWle Polcie The Absolute PoDCies are intended to eddrm the mast nitieal issues asswiazed with residential devempment. Theu include assuring neighborhood compatibility, compliance with edophd plere, adequacy of public facilities end services, end protection o[ the environment end public health. Each project must satisfy aH aMOlute policies Detere approval can De granted. These poGCin are used in evaluation of a residential project az dncribM in Section 19.06.030 of Ipis Title. A. Plans k Policies 3. The Project is consistent with the atlop[ed General Plan, Lend Use Plan. Development Cede, and ell applicable Specific Plans. ~ 2. The Project is consistent with the adopted Master Plen of Trails. -yg_ 3. The Projeel is coruistent with the adopted PvW end Recreation Plan. a. 'ITe Project is consistent with the adopted CircWetion Plen. B. Nei¢ hporhoM Competipility 1. The Project is compatible with end unsitive to ;he immediate environment of the site end neighborhood relative to erchrtectarel design; scale, p_w_k end building heighp itlevtity end n<ighlwrhootl chereeter: building onentatim end set0eck; grading; end visas! integrity. • R. The conflicts [het ere presumed to east between the proposed tlevelepment end surrounding IoM use as described in Table 19.08.050-F pertaining [o "Lend Dse Conflicts",nave been effectively mitigated in the project desgn. 3. The Project u designed so that the additional tretfiC generated does not Mve significant edvene impact on surmundirg tlavelopmen[. C. PubOc Pncili[ies k Services 1. The Project includes school fecili[in or adequate school tecilitin esist which ere ar wiR be capable of ettrommodeting students generated by this project. Written certification from W affected School Districts is required within ninety (901 days prior to the tine) map approval in lee case of the subdivision map or issuance d permits in [he case of ell other rnidenhal projects. R. The Project includes sewer end water feeilitin or adequate facilities east which ere or wiLL be aveileDle to serve the project Written certification from the effected uwtt end water tln4icl required within ninety (90) days prior to final map approval in tL¢ csse of subdivision or issuance of permits in the ceu o(W other residential projects. Fa projeph using septic tank tecilitin allowable by the Senla Ana Regionol Water Control Board and the City, written tcrtf ficetlon of ee¢epta0dity, including eLL supportive informetian, shell De obtained end submitted to the City. 3. The Projeel includes street improvements end will generate lrettic volume resulting in a service level equal to or above level D (defined es a 85-95 percent volume to capacity repo Dy Ne DKS traffic study). 4. The Project provide adequate access for emergency vehicles. 5. The Project provides storm droiln, mater ptmned drainage (emlipn or special armnage facilities necessary to adequately dispose of surface water runoff or alleviate grading mnstremts. 8. The Project provfdn fu a HomeownePa Association and/or Neinlenence Dlalrl Cl l0 enaurC tgtll 011-x11! and of(Sila malntlnanCa• 1. The Project conforms to the access control poli¢in of [he Cenersl Plnn regerding erteriels. 0. The Project provide local (ceder trials and rommunity trails u requred by the General Plen. A ~~~ ~ 7 !) r~ • r.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Sanuary 16, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of City Council FROH: Lauren M. Naeaerman, City Nanager SUBJECT: CIVIC CERTER PROGRAM REPORT ~ c~~oyc 9 ~ 1 iy !,~ LA ~ ~ Z _ a 19~i ~ It is recommended chat the Ci[y Council accept the report prepared by the architectural firm of John Carl Naraecke d Aesocia tes for our future Civic Center project. In addition to deacr ibing [he planning and opera[ ianal obj ec[iv ea of the program, the document also includes an analysis of the space needs and working relationsh ipa for all City department a. After chic document has been accepted by the Ci[y Council, the nest stage of the architectural proce se is preparation of the athematic draw inga. Schema[ ica are normally based upon the working relation eh ipa followed by Ghe outside design of [he fae ili[ie a. It is the view of [he staff that [he report is very thorough and has included the comments offered by members of Che City Council, as sell ae staff members aho have been in[erv iewed by the architects. IG is significant to note that the propo aed fat it i[iea include Guff is ien[ areas for further expana ion in [he event [he priorities of the Ci[y change. In the medium term, of course, schematic design sill also incorporate capahil i[iee for loog range expansion. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Program Re pore dated De<embez 1984. In addition, it is recommended chat the architects be instructed to proceed with the next phase of the project which is the preparation of the schematic dr aw inga fot Further cone ideration by the Cicy. Respectfully submitted, Lauren M. Hasse rman City Manager P.S. Plea ae bring your copies of the final report already diatr ibuted. LMN/kep ~ 3/ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~cntiloro STAFF REPORT ~t~O °q Y ell?. Y ~ i'.Z GATE: January 16, 1985 19T T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. 'din ing er, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL BY INLAND MEDIATION BOARD TO ARTI I AT [N A SHARED HOUSING OR SENIORS ROGRAM BACKGROUND: Since 1982, the City has utilized Block Grant funds to contract far landlord/tenant information and mediation with Inland Mediation Board (IMB), a nonprofit organization which contracts with many cities in the region to provide these services. Recently, IMB submitted a request to the City for funding to contribute to the initiation costs of a Shared Housing for Seniors program. This program would provide a free service to senior citizens, matching seniors in need of housing with others who wish to Share their home and • housing costs. This service is extremely helpful to senior homeowners who wish to remain in their homes but need assistance with housing costs and in many cases provides companionship for both parties. The program also provides displaced senior citizens an affordable alternative to ilving alone. Similar programs exist in Riverside, Santa Ana and Garden Grave. Housing matches occur through a computerized system with preliminary interviews and counseling conducted by Inland Mediation Board staff. Inland Mediation Board has requested an allocation of $5,000 of Block Grant funds over the nett two years as Rancho Cucamonga's share of the regional cost, based on the number of senior citizens residing in the area. The program will operate on a regional basis with housing matches occurring throughout the westnrn San Bernardino County region. Financial support will 6e prov iued by a State grant, with matching funds from the region's cities, Many of which have agreed to support the program. The program cost of 35,000 would be allocated from 1985-86 year's 31ock Grant funds follo~.+ing the public hearings scheduled in March and April. RECOMMENDATION: Given the relatively low cost of participation in the program and evidence of its effectiveness in other localities, staff and the City's Block Grant consultant, Cotton/Beland/Associates recommend tentative approval of Inland Mediation Board's request for $5,000 for the Shared Housing for Seniors program, contingent upon 1985-86 Block Grant levels of funding. A letter of intent to participate in the program is attached to this report. Should Council approve the request, 23~^ Inland Mediation Board Shared Housing for Seniors Program January 16, 1985 Page 2 • the letter of intent will require the mayor's signature. In addition, Staff will place the IMB request on the 1965-86 Block Grant project list to be approved by Council in the Block Grant public hearing in March and April. ~ Res ctfu 11 ,submitted, Rick m pity lanrieN~~ ~RG: L'd: jr ~Attac hments: Letter from Inland Mediation Board Dated December 21, 1984 Letter of Intent • C X33 Inland Mediation Board CEC N i i36 F61 P:] 71P,Plri': .. jjl]I~hj~.l~tii6 December 21, i9 H4 Mr. Otto Kroutil Community Development Department Planning Division P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Kroutil, Inland Mediation Board would like the City of Rancho Cucamonga eo consider expanding their social services to the community by adding the Shared Houa ing for Seniors program. This type of service is not actively being done in this area. Inland Mediation Board would offer a Eree service [o those displaced • senior citizens who have no home because they have been priced out of the housing market. Due [c increasing financial distress, many seniors citizens see shared housing as a viable alternative. This program will help the senior to reduce housing costs by matching with other comparable individuals En the San Bernardino County area. The program would follow the slate guidelines. According Co 7984 Rancho Cucamonga population figures the senior count is 5X of total population. "The state will fund this two year program for a total of $50,000 asking the County and cities within the area Co match funds. This means Inland Mediation Boaid has to raise $50,000 far [he 1985-1987 fiscal years Erom the local communities. If Rancho Cucamonga would like Co participate $5,000 would be their approximate share. Our organization would be glad to meet with you to discuss this program if there are any questions or problems. Rancho Cucamonga's cooperation is an important factor in the total success. Yours truly, ~~~ Be ecy Davidow Executive Director BD/br Sf1xj,.~r~rp~ylahwav Suita„6 ,eAanpho Cucamonga, CA 917]0 ' ~~~'~~~'~~" • (77 4) 987.8883 ~ (BOO) 3414911 ~~cA,xo"1'c ~~,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA y~10 vy.. Jon D. Mike6 }~~ ~ A Ceur,Ln.mMn Z - a Charles J. RUyuet 11 J<flre7 Rine 19'~ RichaN ll. Dahl Pameh J. R'dght January 16, 1985 Betty Davidow, Executive Director Inland Mediation Board 9613 Arrow Highway, Suite "A" Rancho Cl~c amonga, California 91130 SUBJECT: INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SHARED HOUSING FOR SENIORS PROGRAM Dear Ms. Davidow: This letter is to inform you of the City of Rancho Cuc amonga's intent to participate in the Shared Housing for Seniors Program, as described in your letter of December 21, 1984. It is our understanding that the financial commitment requested of the City is in the amount of 55,000 over a two year period. It is our intent to allocate funds for the program from the Community Development Block Grant of either 1984-85 or 1985-86. Given current levels of funding, we anticipate that the allocation of funds for the Shared Housing for Seniors Program will be accomplished prior to June 1985. If unexpected cutbacks in COBG funds occur, we will re-evaluate funding sources at that time. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is pleased to participate in the Shared Housing for Seniors Program and commends Inland Mediation Board for your contribution to senior housing in the region. Sincerely, Jon D. Mikels, Mayor JM:jr • I , LJ • ~ 3.f 9a90 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C PoBT OFFICE BOX 9W RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIFORNIA 917a0 p1118a94951 • • viaa Vr i\Arv lirlV VUliH1r1V1VVH MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate P anner SUBJECT: GOODWILL COLLECTION TRA LER t~ C`~MOHC9 x" ~ .,,a; it 1'3'. BACKGROUND: Goodwill Industries requested that this item be placed on the agenda to discuss the Dossiblity of amending the Development Code to permit the permanent location of a collection trailer (Exhibit "A") within selected shopping centers. This request constitutes an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision in September of 1984 to uphold the Development Code requirements for a Temporary Use Permit for limited periods of time. The minutes of the September 12, 1984 Planning Commission meeting and staff report are attached for your information. Again, the Planning Commission's decision was to not amend the Development Code. RECOMMENDATION: If the Council favors trailers as a permanent use, staff recommends that this item be referred back to the Planning Commission with specific direction for any necessary modifications to the Development Code. RG:CC:fr Attachments: Minutes - September 12, 1984 Staff Report - September 12, 1984 Exhibit "A" - Goodwill Trailer s 33G • Goodwill Industries ~ of the Inland Counties, Inc. P O 6ax 760 • 899 West Thirtl Street • TTY 824-t0a0 San Bernardino. Caldprnia 92402 •1714)885-3831;825-7351 J anuarv 8, 1981 Beverly duehelec C icy Clerk Ci[v o'. Rancho Cucamonga Yost Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, G~ 91i3D-0807 Dear Ns. Au the le c: I e+ould tike [o he placed on [he agenda for the next mee[in¢ of the Gi[y Council co discuss a possible change in Ci[y Ordinances. eo allow the place- Tsne '.:i thin vonr cicc limits of one of our .4a ended Colle ccion Cenee a . • :'ours crule, iia resin T. Harder Comr:ne rc ial Developer DT!I:odh X37 ,~ r _ . _ __.. c:.~•:; ..1 ` ,~;;~, FORTH crrY or ITE\I ic.~ i~~. ~ R,1\CHO CLGIJIO\G~ TITLE: ~_ PLA~'NI\G DI\'ISIQV E\H16IT~ Sc\Le ?~F ~,,.. ~ ~- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA ~~cn.tlp MEMORANDUM ~'~~~~~_ _ , ~~X}~~ x DATE: September 12, 1984 -_ ~cL J TD: - -- jn-=-- Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRDM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beed le, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MOBILE USES BACKGROUND: Recently, the staff received requests from the Garden State Paper Company and Goodwill Services to operate mobile uses at a permanent location within selected neighborhood shopping centers. The mobile center is described as a trailer or a container-like enclosure which is manned during fixed hours of operation to receive goods for recycling, such as newspaper or items normally donated to charity. ANALYSIS: There are no provisions in the Development District ordinance for mobile uses to occur on a permanent basis in a neighborhood shopping • center. The Development Code provides that commercial or other similar services are to 6e located within an enclosed building unless a special or temporary use permit is approved under certain circumstances (i. e., Christmas sale lot, or veterinary clinics). There was considerable debate regarding mobile uses during the drafting of the Development Code. The Hain point of contention of the Planning Commission and Chamber of Commerce dealt with equity issues between developing a permanent site and incurring all the cost vs. establishing a mobile business and not paying a fair share. The temporary use/special events permits were the compromise to mobile uses for short durations under special guidelines. In such cases, it is passible for the City Planner to approve a temporary use/special event permit under specific conditions including length of time, location, and other necessary arrangements to insure their compatibility with their surroundings. In this particular case, neither applicant wishes to utilize the temporary use/special event permit process, but has asked that the Commission consider a permanent solution for their operations. The Commission should consider two options: (1) affirm the existing requirements of the Development Code regarding temporary uses; and, (2) include such mobile uses on a permanent basis. Should mobile uses be considered as an acceptable function in a commercial district on a permanent basis, certain items should be considered including their form of entitlement, location, time of operations, the nature of the operation on the services surro~~nd ing the site including parking, traffic circulation, and the visual effect of the location of the facility in a shopping center. J ~ti ~ f • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission reaffirm the De- velopment Code requirements for temporary use/special event and provisions for mobile uses under limited periods of time under conditions set forth in a temporary use/special event permit. AGSpectf y ubmitted, 'i~~, i.~, ~, :,-~t, „f~----- ~iclyi me it Planner RG:TB:jr Attachment lJ • ~~:0 GCU'np N a~ `C ~' ,~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r. c J ~:~ ^+• •'~^h~`t1\ `_ .N.,e. Jon D. )fikrls ~~„c~~.~J'v` > Charles 7. Bu9oet 11 Jeffre, Fin, 1e1; Riehara ?l. Uahl Pa-+eL 1. Rri,hl Aucust 2, 1984 Uavid L. Nats on P. O. Sox 2364 Poreona, California 91769 Dear ^1r. Watson: Last week, Rick Gomez, City Planner, and ¢yself met wi*.h Bill Shepherd tD discuss the continued operation of the Mobile Recycling Centers located in the parki nq areas of both Ftpha Seta and Perry's Market. Mr. Sheoh erd was informed of the requirements controlling mobile businesses wi loin our City. Now, I will briefly explain these requirements to you so that arrangements can be made to reopen the two robile recycling Centers on an interim basis. City Ordinance permits mobile businesses to be operated within the City on a temporary basis, 60 days out of each calendar year. This 60 days can be split up into four (4) periods, each period not to exceed fifteen (i5) continuous days. After each fifteen X15} day period, t'-.e mobile recycling trailers must be removed`roc~ the property until the corune ncement of the next fif teen day period. Your or;anizatiDn has already submitted two (2) Special Event Permit applications for approval. If you would inform me of your initial com~r~encement dates, I would be happy to complete the applications and fo rv+ard for approval. If you require additional intorna lion, please do not hesitate to contact either mys elf or Rick Gomez at 989-1851. ' Sincerely, C6F+h1UNli'f DEVELOPNE'T 0'c PARTt~ENT PLAf;N tt;G DIMS IO9 ~~-a ry'r. pf chards ~~~~~ ~ Ccde~Enforceasnt Officer GWR/das 98^.0 DASELINF, RU.{D, SI:ITE C POST OFFICE, BO\ BOi R:1_\CNO C'l'C.{)(q~GA. CALIFORSIA 91730 (711 9fl9d851 j An P.f 9i'a se o? Mea.e ven/ Pesl Of{Ice Ba 236? Pem one Cel'no~ '76?~23h< !i ~. ~', 623.bbCl J C ~'. ~~~ ~ GARDEN STATE PAPER COMPANY, INC. VbnCSia:9esrr~T,pr of o;cV xwspapea'mro pua~rt~newspanr August 3, 1984 Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Jen htikels, Mayor CITY COUNCIL OF R,LYCHO CUCA.MONGA P, 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Honorable City Fianager, Mayor and City Council: {Ve are seeking Council approval to operate a mobtle newspaper recycling center at the following three grocery stores in your city: Pe try's Mark et - 9477 Foothill Blvd. o Alpha Beta A178 - 9640 Baseline Alpha Beta 4235 - 6753 Ca: nelian Avenue These markets would like to work in conjunction with Garden State Paper Company to offer the community an opportunity to receive payment in grocc ri es for old newspapers. The mobile centers would be open on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays • between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 5:00 p,m. Customers bring their news- papers with them on the way to the grocery store and receive a voucher redeemable in the store. 8enefi is to the Community - The community benefits from this program in several ways: 1. Money is brought into the City and spent in the local grocery store. 2. Citi :.er.s receive groceries for tons of newspaper which would otherwise be transported to overcrowded landfills. 3. Community enthusiasm for recycling is generated. 4. The mobile newspaper container is very attractive, manned, and not a permanent structure. S. A job opportunity is provided to a local citizen desirous of part-time employment, 6. Em•i rermentally cence rned citizens are able to contribute to the recycling effort in a pleasant communi t}' setting. .. Garden State will maintain a clean, orderly, attractive environ- ment at the store and will fully insure and indemnify the project. • c ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Two • Garden State Paper Company is the world's largest rec ycler of used newspapers into quality newsprint. Ke're receired several national awards for our efforts in recycling. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, J ,r_7,. Ron Schweit.er, ?tanager ?tohile Recycling Operations R: /rvm cc: D. {l atson J ~~.7 _ .., :'~" P vv s ~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~,\ 1 '~ . , ~, ,', ~ ~, ~~~ 1\ ~. `i ( Section 11.10.030 (e) Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to • provide a comprehensive circulation system; end (f) The development or approval of any portion o[ a center shall require the development of a cenceotual development plan which shall consider such things as, but not limited to, circulation, wtiform architectural design, drainage/grading, buffers, phased improvements and landscaping. G. Condition Of CseS 1. Outdoor disolavs and sales of merchandise: All businesses shall be conducted completely within an enclosed building. The following outdoor sales and commercial activities may be permitted to operate outdoors, within their respective districts and subject to any required reviews and permits: (a) Automobile, boat, tr¢iler, camper, and motorcycle sales and rentals (subject to s Conditional Use Permit); (b) Building material, supplies and equipment rental and sales (subject to a Conditional Use Permit); (c) Fruit and vegetable stands (requires temporary use permit); (d) Hordcul[ural nurseries (subject to a Conditional Use Permit); (e) Gasoline pumps, oil racks, and accessory items when located on pump • islands; (f) Outdoor display of merchandise as accessory to current on-site business (subsection G-3 of this Section); (g) Outdoor recreation uses; (h) Parking lot and sidewalk sales (subject to temporary use permit and regulations set Corth in this chapter); and (i) Other activities and uses similar to those nbove as determined by the City Planner. 2. Parking lot and sidewalk sales: Perking lot end sidewalk sales ore Clea market type of opcr ~, •'on may be permitted in the commercial districts subject to the approvu~ u[ a Temporary Use Permit as described in Chapter 17.01.070 and [he following criteria: (a) 'Che sole may not exceed three (S) days during any three (3) month period: (b) The prospec4ve merchant must obtain written authorization of property owner. (c) The activity shall not present a hazard to pedestrians or encroach on • a required building exit; -105- ~ 4j C Section 17.10.030 (d) Sete vehicle ingress and egress shall be provided at all times; end • (e) Adequate perking shell be provided end maintained during the course of the activity. 3. Outdoor Disolav oC 4lerchandise 4ceessorv to Current On-site Business: Any outdoor dlspley must be done m conjunction with the business being conducted within the building and shall comply with the following regulations: (a) The items being displayed shall be of the same type that ere lawfully displayed end sold inside the buiiding on the premises; (b) The aggregate display area shell not exceed twenty-five percent (26%) o[ the linear frontage of the store front or six (6) linear feet, whichever is greater; (e) Items shall not project more then Cour (;) Ceet from the store front; (d) No item, or any portion thereof, shall be displayed on public property; provided, however, items may be displayed within the public rightbf-way iC an encroachment permit has first been procured Crom the city; (e) Items shall be displayed only during the hours that the business conducted inside the building on [he pre anises is open Cor business; (f) No item shall be displayed in a manner that: causes a safety hazard; obstructs the entrance to any building; interferes with, or impedes the flow of, pedestrian or vehicle traffic; is unsightly or creates any other condition that is detrimental to the appearance of the premises or any surrounding property; or in any other manner is detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or causes a public nuisance. H. Abandoned or Converted Service Stations 1. Abandoned Service Stations. Service stations which become vacant or cease operation beyond one-hundred and eighty (180) days shell be required to remove all underground storage tanks (or other method acceptable to the Foothill Fire Protection District), remove all gasoline pumps and pump islands, and shall remove tree-standing canopies. In order to prevent said action, the owner must supply the City Planner with written verification prior to the 180th day that an allocation of gas has been received and operation of the station will commence within thirty (00) days of the date of written correspondence. If the service station is to resume operation after the 180 days, then the City Planner shall require the processing and approval o[ a development review application to ensure that the facilities will be reasonably upgraded end maintained. This could include such things es, but not limited to, replanting existing landscape areas, installing new landscape areas, painting of structures, upgrading or installing trash enclosure, striping perking spaces, installation cf signs in conformance with adopted sign provisions in Title 14 oP the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, re- surfacing vehicle access and parking areas, and installation of missing street improvements. -107- ~yc ~ 1{ # i DIRECTOR'S REPORTS P. POLICY DECISION ON THE LOCP.TION OF 20ATASLE pECYCLING CENTERS Sick Gomez, City Planner, reviews staff report on mobile uses presented to the Commission. Mr. Da rwyn Harder, reo resenting Goodwill Industries, indicates they will not locate a mobile unit on Haven Avenue and there will not be a proliferation of these units because there must 5e at least a five mile radius hetween them. Aon Cho ise, operator of Ga ^den State Paper company, Inc., advises of benefits of recyc'_in3 and favorable impact on environm=_nt. Discussion ensues and the Comvission advises that Lhey are not against recycling. The issue is whether this kind oC solution is acceptable. The Commission expresses concern with aesthetics, :oc anon, landscaping and ~l:nw i^.; private cones r^s to be able to do that sort of thing without incurr.nv, cost asor fated with es ta5lishing a business even though they are 'r.e:p ing the enviror.men t. • I1ction: :loved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to affirm the e>: i:;:ing regviremen is oC the Development Code. • Chairman Stout states there may he some other solution which may be presented at some otr.er t-.^e. ~ ~ • • : 7lanning Commission Minutes -14- September 12, 1904 X47 ~L1MEMORANDUM V z?°~ ~ 'fi'r. x' ~ T Date: January 16, 1985 C Z ~ ~, To: City Council and City Manager i -~~'.~~a j 19%% From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Depar ant i Subject: Approval of entering into agreements with F. Mackenzie Brown, Fie ldman and Rolapp, Nildan Associa tesr and Recreation Systems, Inc. to provide requested preliminary services in relation to the possible formation of the Rancho Cucamonga Pazk and Recreation Improvement District (P.A .R .D.) (Consent Calendar Item 'R' - January t6, 1985) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of separate agreements with F. Mackenzie Brown, Fie ldman and Rolapp, Nildan Associates, and Recreation Sys terns, Inc., for the provision of services related to the Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation District. (P.A .R .D.) BACK GROUND: First, staff apologies for the lack of time afforded Council for review of the agreements. This was precipitated by the very tight time frame we are working on and the complexity involved for the consultant accurately estimating work involved on a brand new process. Thee is, what we are doing has never been done before in exactly the way we are proposing to do it. Re9t assured, however, the agreements are hasical ly standard form 'assessment district" consultant agreement, with the same sliding sca lee, the same whereas and wherefore clauses [hat you have seen before on each project which you have approved. Further you have had previous agreements with each of the four firms involved, all of which have been succeeafully concluded. In summary, Ne way a situation like this works, is that there are certain "up-front" costa that must be paid whether the district is formed or not. tfien and if the district ie tormed, there will be further costs aeaociated with bond sales, final plane and Specifications, validation, etc., All cost are recoverable if the district is formed. If the district is not formed, the "up-front' money is not recoverahle. Simple as that. For ins lance, for legal bond counsel we will be obligated to an "up-Eront" cast not to exceed $1,500. However if the district is formed and all of the neceaeary legal work must be done and bond as le accomplished, the fee will, per the standard formula, set the total fee at approximately 530,000. Municipal finance consultatnt fees will range from an "up-front" not to exceed $2,750, for Phase I work prior to diatri ct forma tlon. After formation and bond Bale that figure would be increased to a total of approximately $40,000. Page 2 P .A.R.D. 01/16/85 Design and engineer services, provided by Recreation Sya terra, Inc., are viewed in a little different light Nan the other coneultan is oz this project, in that the ao tk that they are doing will be ve lueble and of future use wheNer the district is formed or not. Fees for preliminary plans and engineer specifications, which we are classifying as 'up-front' coat in connected with Ne diatrici, are $65,730. Should Ne district be formed, construction plane, specifications and construction obaerva lion would add to the cost an additional 5240,800. This sounds like a lot of money.. .it is. eoweve r, when viewed it's relation to the to sal project cost, it represents 5.7e which is well wi Nin industry standards for design and engineering serviced. wilden and Associates contract has not as yet been delivered so I won't be able to comment herein to it's conien t. It is supposed to be delivered to me prior to tonigh is meeting. Again, apologies for Ne lack of review time. SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 1980, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~,`IC,Z7~LIFORNIA, as public`corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and F. MACKEN2fE BRONN, INC „ (hereinafter referred to as "Counsel"). NON, THEREFORE, tT IS HEREBY AGREEG by and between the parties hereto as follows: SECTION 1, That Counsel shall perform legal services in connection with the proposed assessment proceedings and bond issuance in the matter of a proposed special assessment district known antl designated as PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAf,E AND REDH ILL COMMUNITY PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "Oistr ict"~ under proceedings conducted pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code Of the State of California. Said services shall include: A, Review of the dedication and acquisition of the streets and easements or other property in which proposed work is to be performed; B. Examination of the plans and specifications for the proposed work, the boundary map and assessment diagram of the District, the assess- ment roll and bonds, and the giving of instructions and advice fn connection with the foregoing; C. Recommendations as to procedure, schedules and actions that should be conducted and taken; D. Preparation of all resolutions, notices, contracts, bond forms, and other papers and documents required in the proceedings; E. Examination of the proceedings, step by step, as taken: F. Appear at all hearings under the Dr oceedings, and attend any meeting where attendance is requested: G. Make recommendations as to sale of bonds, if desired; H. Issuance of an approv inq legal opinion attesting to the validity of the proceedings and the issuance of the bonds. Such legal services shall not include any services in connection with the acquisition, by easement or condemnation, of any easements or other interest in real property necessary for the proposed improvements. These services can be provided by Counsel, by separate agreement, if desired. SECTION 2. That the City shall perform as follows: A. Furnish to Counsel such maps, records, title searches, and other documents and proceedings, or certified copies thereof, as are avail- able and may De reasonably required 6y Counsel in the performance of the services hereunder; B. Pay to Counsel a fee computed on the confirmed assessment as follows: TNO PERCENT (2X) on the first 5500,000; ONE PERCENT (1X) from 5500,001 to S2,000,ODO; THIRTY ONE-HUNDR EOTHS PERCENT (.30X) on the balance thereof. C. Payment of the above-referenced fee shall be as follows: All due and payable upon receipt of money from the sale and delivery of bonds to the successful underwriter. SECTION 3. In the event the proceedings are terminated or abandoned prior to comple- tion, Counsel shall be paid a reasonable fee for services rendered to date based on an hourly rate of Eg0.00 per hour, not to exceed 51,500.00. SECTION 4. That this Agreement may be terminatetl by either party hereto by mailing written notice thereof to the other party. IN NITNESS NH EREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first hereinabove written. "CITY" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ny: CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: I Y LERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA "COUNSEL" F. MACKE\N2IE BRONN, INC. ey: ~ 1 , r.a .• ~ 1,~ ,n Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates MUNICIPAL FlNANGIAL CGN$ULTANIS Sanuary 7, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 C Baseline Road P.O. Box 907 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Financial Consu). tans Services 1995 Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District Gentlemen: Pursuant to a request £rom William L. Nolly, Director o£ Community Services Department, we are pleased to submit this letter proposal for municipal financial services to be performed in conjunction with the £inaneing of the development of Heritage ParK (approximately 40 acres) and Red Hill Basin Park (approximately 48 acres} and ongoing maintenance costs ("Project"). We understan^ that the proceedings will 6e accomplished through the provisions of the 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act ("'72 Act") with bonds being issue4 pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ("1915 Act Bonds"). l:ur services can be divided into two phases. Phase I wi! 1 include a preliminary survey with your City Council, staff, and bontl counsel for the purpose of making a preliminary survey of the Project and to assist in the formulation of a coordinated plan to 1'i Hance the Project. Phase I will also involve meetings with property owners and taxpayers to explain the effects of the proposed fSnancing, PHASB II Phase IT includes aervices to be performed in conjunction with the ma rice Ling of bonds issued pursuant to the Improvement Bona Act of 1915 as follows: 8001 Hnetness Center Drive, Suite 803 Irvine, Calitornle 88716 (71~) 768-8781 l7unicipal Bond Market Furnish the City with information concerning municipal bond marKet conditions and make recommendations as to the technical details o£ the £inancing, inclutling maturity schedules, funds, covenants, and otner details which will, in our opinion, make the proposed financing most acceptable to prospective purchasers and, the re Sore, marketable at the lowest possible interest ca te. B. Sealed Cospetitive Bid At the direction of the City, assist the City In calling for competitive bids. a) Disclosure Document. Accumulate and compile into a Statement economic, financial, an3 statistical data pertaining to the proposed financing, which Disclosure Document shall be satisfactory to you. The Disclosure Document will include the Official Notice of Sale. b) Due Diligence Meeting. Prior to the production and distribution o£ any Disclosure Document, the City agrees to hold a due diligence meeting to verify the accuracy of the data contained in the 6isclosure Document and make full disclosure oi' all pertinent information concerning the economy and finances of the City. We will parSicipate in such due diligence meeting and assist you Sn the examination o£ pertinent financial data. c) Production oY the Disclosure Document. Under the supervision of the City, cause to produce said Disclosure Document. d) Distribution of Disclosure Document. Distribute copies of the Disclosure Document to municipal bond underwti ters known to have an interest in the type of bonds contemplated hereunder. e) Updating oY Diaclasure Document. In the event the authorized Financing is sold in more than one sale, we will update and distribute copies of the revised Disclosure Document in accordance with B.aj, B,b), B.c), and B.d), above. MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS f) Consultation/Advice. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available for consultation and advice until such time as the bonds issued to finance the Project have been sold. g) Contact of Bond Underrriters. Make direct contact with a select number of bond underwriters in an effort to stimulate bidding on the bonds. h) THE BOND BUYER Ad. Place an advertisement in THE BOND BUYER announcing the offering of the bond issue prior to the time bids are received for such issue. i) Attendance at Bond Sa le a. Attend meetings of the City at which bids for bonds are received Yor the purpose of assisting in the computation and evaluation of such bids. C. Attendance at Bond Closing We will compute closing figures, including accrued interest, and assist in the coordination of events of the closing. Table oY Debt Service Af tzr the bonds have been deliver_d, we will prepare and furnish the City a Table of Debt Service which will set forth actual semis rn ual and annual payments oi' principal and interest due on the bonds. At the bond closing, the City agrees to furnish the successful bidder a certificate, signed by the appropriate officials of Cne City, acting in their official caps rity, to the effect that to the best of their knowledge and belief, and after reasonable investigation, a) neither the Disclosure Document nor any amendment or supplement thereto contains any untrue statement of a material Yact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading; b) since the date of the Disclosure Document, no event has occurred which should have been set Y'o rth in such an amendment or supplement; nor c) has there been any material adverse change in the operation or financial affairs of the City since the date of such Disclosure Document. MUNICIPAL FtNANGIAL CONSU LTANTS FEES For all services to be rendered hereunder, the City agrees to pay us a fee as follows: One Percent (1%) of the first Three Million Dollars par value of each sale o£ bonds sold to finance the Project; Three-Quarters of One Percent (5/4%) of the next One Million Dollars par value of each sale of bonds sold to finance the Project; One-Half of One Percent (1/2%} of the par value of each sale of bonds sold to finance the Project in excess of Four Million Dollars, provided that the minimum fee shall be $12,500 for each sale of bonds. It Ls understood that this Yee will be payable from the proceeds o£ each sale of Donds. ABANDONMENT In the event the Project is abandoned prior to the completion of the financing, the City agrees to pay us a fee to the reasonahle value o£ services rendered, not to exceed $12,500. Heaso noble value Yor Our services shall be determined by using our then current hourly rates. The attached schedule sets forth our present hourly rates. EXPENSES This agreement contemplates that we will pay all of our out- o£-pocket expenses exoept expenses incurred in connection with paragraphs fl.c), B.d), e.e), and B.h), above. In addition, if it is possible to obtain a rating on the bonds from Standard & Poor's Corporation and/oc Ptoody's Investors Service and/or other rating secv ice and/or if municipal bond insurance is available, the City agrees to pay for the costs of such rating and insurance. Further if travel outside of Southern California is authorized by the City, the City agrees to pay the cost o£ such travel and expenses connected therewith. PAYMENT a) Payment for all services rendered and expenses incurred pursuant to Phase II above sha 11 be paid from the proceeds oY the contemplated bonds within forty-five (45) days following the sale of such bonds to a bona fide purchaser. MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSVLTANTS b) In the event of abandonment of the Project, abandonment fees (as set forth above) shall be due and payable immediately after such abandonment. TERMS This agreement shall remain in Yull force and effect until such time as the Project has been completed or until the City abandons the Project, whichever shall first occur. St is expressly understood that this agreement does not intend to and is not under any circumstances to De construed as requiring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an expert financial advisory cacpacity only. If the foregoing proposal is satisfactory to you, please to Ke appropriate action to authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the duplicate copy hereof. Respectfully submitted, FZELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES Lawrence G. Rolapp ~~ LGR/pae Attacnment ACCEPTAMCE: Executed on behalf of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA this day o£ , 1985. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA By Title Attest: 5 MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates MUNiC iGAI FINANCIAL CONSUUANTS SCHEDULE QF FEES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1984 Principals of the Firm $85.00 Per Hour Technical Assistants $45.00 Par Hour 8091 Bndnen Center Drive, Bulte 893 Irvine, California 90716 (71~) 068-8783 R51 ?r- _.. ~Y'~.'.'Afu .., ...... Rp-'9a:'OP a~C E, n~ nl o'° r. . January 9, 1935 William L. Holley, Director Comm nity Services City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SL'BJE CT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES HERITAGE COMI4UN ITY PARK AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK Dear Bill: T'rns proposal for professional design services is submitted in ac- cordance with your request and reflects our interpretation of re- quired work. Contents include a suggestetl scope of work, proposed project team, and discussion on professional fees. Our proposal is based on the understanding Lhat both parks will be designed as a single project, with one set of drawings and specifications. SCCPE OF SERVICES [t is RSI's intent to produce a final work product that meets the objectives or" the City in terms of design quality, vandal resistance, innovation, budget control and completion schedules. To assure achievement of this goal, adjustments to this program can be made. 'AOrk will include, but is not limited to the following: Phase l_- Preliminary_Construction Plans, Outline Specifications. and_C_os t_Estima to 1. Prepare preliminary plans and outline specifications to finalize actual scope of improvements. 2. Prepare detailed cost estimates for all improvements. 3. Submit far City and Agencies' review and approvals, as required. 4. Correct plans as directed and adjust scope to meet budget limita- tions. Phase II - Construe tion_P1ans, Specifications and Cost Estimate 1. Prepare final plans, specifications and kidding documents in sufficient detail to obtain competitive bi4s. P1 ans to meet all federal, state and local requirements, as necessary. Con- sultant shall provide required check prints and reading copies of specifications for checking and processing. 2500 East Norwood A,enua Sune 210 Fu'~i?non Caiibm•a 92631 I7 t 41 8 7963 7 3 William L. Holley van ua ry 9, 1985 Page 2 2. Submit for final checking and correct plans as necessary. 3. Present final cost estimate for review and approval. Phase II[ - Construction Observation Services 1. Assist City in the bidding prates s. 2. Review and approve all shop drawings. 3. Provide site visitations and reports on construction progress and quality, with recomne nda tions for correction of deficiencies, as required. 4. Assist in determining and processing change orders. 5. Review and approve interim pay revues t. 6. Participate in construction inspections, as required. PROJECT TEAM As prime consultant, Recreation Systems, Inc. will assume full responsi- bility for coordination of the total project. Service will include assignment of planning responsibilities, client and community contact, accomplishment scheduling, and the evaluation and interpretation of project requirements, as outlined in our Scope of Services. RONALD F. PAIGE will serve as Project Coordinator for RSI. STEVEN N. LANG, registered landscape Architect, will participate in project de- sign and coordinate plan production. Recreation Systems, Inc. believes in the concept of team planning and the need for the inclusion of comprehensive coverage of planning needs with individuals or firms that have recognized expertise in each area of con- cern. RANDALL K. ME YE R, registered California Architect, will be re- sponsible for designing the park buildings and feature structures. WILL- DAN AS SOLI AT ES will participate in the design of the street improvements and the drainage systems required at both parks. RSI and WILLDAN have a long standing association which has produced many successful projects. P ROFESSIONAL_ FEE Recreation Systems, Inc. proposes to complete all services for both sites as described in the scope of services for the following lump sum fees: Preliminary Plans, Outline Specifications and Cost Estimate (5103,200 less 537,470) 565,730.00 Construction Plans, Specifications and Estimate 172,000.00 Construction Observation 68,800.00 5306,530.00 William L. Holley January 9, 1985 Page 3 This fee is es tahlished in accordance with the Los Angeles County Sliding Percentage Fee Schedule shown below, and is based upon a cons trurtion bud- get of 56,000,000 or actual construction costs, whichever is lower. The full fee received by Recreation Systems for the Design Development Phase {537,470.00) has been proportionately credited against the fee for pre- liminary plans, outline specifications and cost estimate. Compensation based on Percentage of Construction Cost Construction Cost 0 to 530,000.00 530 ,noo .DD to 560,000.00 560,000.00 to S1 U0 ,000.00 $100,000.00 to 5200,000.00 5200,000.00 to 5500,000.00 S500 ,000.00 to 51,000,000.00 st,ooD,ooo.oo to sz,ooo,ooo.oo 52,000,000.00 to 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 to 510,000,000.00 Maximum Fee 12. 1J; B, $8,000.00 + 7~s: of amount over 5100,000.00 515,500,00 + 7~ of amount over 5200,000,00 $36,500.00 + b':~ of amount over ,500,000 AO $69,000.00 + 6", of amount over 51,000,000.00 $129,000.00 + 5,'„ of amount over 52,000,000.00 5294,000.00 + 5', of amount over }5,000 ,J00.00 Any increases in scope of improvements not currently included in the master plan and design development reports wilt be added to the construction budget and tle sign fees accordingly. Should Extra Services be required or requested by the City, RSI can provide such services at the following hourly rates: Principal Construction Representative Project Landscape Architect Landscape Architect/Designer Drafts De rson Clerical $6D .DD/hour 545.00/hour 540.00/hour 537.50/hour 520.00-SG 5.00/hour 515.00/hour (These hourly rates will remain in effect throughout 1985.) RS I's fees include all costs for tra nsportatinn, telephone, interim sub- missions, review specifications and check prints. The City shall pro- vide or assume ail costs for reproduction of final plans and specifica- tions for bidding purposes. The City shall also provide sail and Structural tests as required. RSI can coordinate these services for the City at actual costs plus 5'. for handling. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. o s truly,^ ~~^~'~, RONALD F. PA IIGE v President WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ^ E'~iGINEE <S & PI~,NI~ERS o~.. _ ._~..-.._ ....- ,~..._ -- ..: _ ~.~ . _ ~- 16 January 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: M11r 1Yilliam L. Holley Director, Community Services Department Subject: Assessment District Formation Heritage and Red Hill Parks Dear Bill We appreciate the opportunity to continue to assist you in your efforts to establish a feasible funding program for the development of the Heri- tage and Red Hill Parks. Our previous analysis associated with the Mello Roos Community Facilities District will serve as an excellent base to begin the formation of an assessment district for the park improve- ments. As we have discussed, it appears the recent changes in the 1972 Act make that process particularly well suited for your proposed projects. This proposal is for the services of Willdan Associates to assist the City in the formation of a benefit assessment District under fhe provisions of the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500, et seq, of the Streets and Highways Code including the most recent changes which pertain to park and recreational facilities and the issuance of bonds. There are approximately 20,000 parcels within the City which could be included in the proposed benefit assessment district. YJe understand that the district may incorporate less than the entire city. 290 S. ANAHEIM BOULEVARD • SUITE 700 • ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805 • (714j 774.5740 • (2131924-t631 City of Rancho Cucamonga Assessment District Formation Heritage and Red Hill Parks Since the amount of work effort to complete the various elements of the overall program will vary, ii is -proposed that our services be provided on an hourly cost basis with a budget limitation, It is proposed that monthly invoices he submitted for work completed during the preceding month based on salary cost times a multiplier of 2,6. It is proposed that the not-to-exceed labor budget be set at 0.75 per- cent of the bond amount. We will invoice at cost from a separate budget for additional expenses related to (he dis [rici such as computer time charges, postage and outside printing. We are prepared to begin immediately on this assignment and will pro- ceed upon your authorization. Please return a signed copy of this letter at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES William C. Stookey Attachments ACCEPTANCE Executed on behalf of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA this ~ day of 1985. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA by Title GENERAL -HERITAGE AND RED HILL PARKS The following Scope of Services presents a detailed outline of the work tasks we propose to furnish in completing the project assignment for the City. It should be noted that, under this proposal, the City is to make available or assist the Engineer in obtaining the following infor- mation or data: 1. Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining computer tapes of the latest equalized Assessor's roll for the City. 2. Assessor's maps for the latest equalized Assessor's roll for the en- tire City. 3. A reproducible boundary map of the City. 4. A map or information showing the areas of the City that are to be assessed for the Heritage and Red Hill parks, 5. The total amount to be assessed for the parks. SCOPE OF SERVICES -HERITAGE AND RED HILL PARKS In conjunction with the formation of the proposed assessment district under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for the Heritage and Red Hill parks, Willdan Associates will: 1. Obtain, with the assistance of the City staff, from the County As- sessor's office the computer tape which lists all parcels within the City. The tape will be converted to a disk compatible to Willdan's computer. Z. Utilizing the information and maps furnished by the City, prepare an assessment district boundary map. 3. ey utilizing the total dollar amount to be assessed as furnished by the City and formula agreed to by the City's staff, establish a park assessment for each land use classification. The County As- sessor's parcel numbers will be used as the assessment parcel numbers. These assessments will be reviewed with the City to determine if all parcels in each classification are receiving equitable assess- ments. u. Enter and edit the City data contained on the County Assessor's computer tapes. Enter other data for defining districts, zones, exemptions, and other special requirements. Establish computer output format. Make initial assessment spreads for the City staff's review. Finalize spread formulas and make final assessment spread. 5. Prepare a preliminary benefit study which includes the formula for spreading assessments and estimated assessments for each land use category. Revise report as directed, 6. Provide sample resolutions for use andlor review by the City At- torney. 7. Present preliminary benefit study, if necessary, at the City Coun- cil work session outlining the assessment spread methodology, ben- efits received by land use category, and the procedure for com- pleting the formation of the proposed district. Revise study re- port as directed, prepare engineer's report, and submit report for Council action. 8. Attend the City Council meeting and answer questions as neces- sary. Modify the engineer's report and assessment roll as direct- ed. 9. Prepare and address notices of public hearing. These notices will be sorted by five-digit zip codes ready for mailing. If a first class permit is not available from the City, postage will have to be affixed to the notice. 10. Attend public hearing as the City's representative to answer questions regarding assessment spread methodology. Modify the engineer's report and assessment roll if required by the City Council. t1. Upon formation of district, program assessment data onto a tape compatible to the County computer for entering individual assess- ments on the tax bills. 72. File diagram map and assessment roll tape with the appropriate County office. 13. Provide the City with one bound copy of assessment roll, maps, and ten copies of the final engineer's report. 14. Inasmuch as this will be the first application of this process in the State of California, we will work closely with the bond attorney or financial consultant to develop the processes and procedures to be followed. In addition to the above services, we are prepared to assist the City in preparing the annual budget and assessments for the district in subse- quent years. Our in-house computer with all stored data will be a valu- able resource in accomplishing this work at a relatively low cost. Our fee to prepare subsequent assessments can be set after the district is formed. - --~- --'CiTYOFRANCI~IOCL'CAMONGA ~icnarq MEMORANDUM °° ~~`° j .. -. _ ~: . > ~. Date: January -e, 1985 l I ~'-['~~ z To; Lauren Wasserman, City Na eager = [, From: Pi 11 Rolley, Direc to [, Community 8ervi ces Peparkment ~jII ~ S ubje r. t: Renuest for Mid-Year Aud get ndj ustment ~ RF.COM MF.NDA TION: It is re rom me nded that ^onside ra ti on he qi ven to req ues tinq of the City Conn cil the authorization to bruin immadia to recruitment fora new position within the Community Service Department, an Assis taut Park Planner, Range 339-389. PACKGRO OND: The implementation of the General Plan's Park Element is Conti m~i ng to accelerate. In addition to the program's task of conceptual system planning and site acgvis ition, handled by the pi rector, we have during the last year begun the task of spe ci Eic site design and construction as hand led by the Park Projects coordinator. It is the latter task which prompt; ih is reaues t. The fmictions of site design and project co nstructi nn are two separate activities each requiring considerable attention in light of the magnitude of projects he inq addressed. For instance, site design en tai is the planni nq of the parks features; coor ding tinq the activities of design/enginee ring consultants; maati nq with city Pla nninq, Engineering and Auildi nq Divisions to review plans for r. om pliance with City standard; coordi ogling with other agenci es such as CCWD, Flood Control, Cal Trans, HUD, State Park and Rer.reaticn, etc., as required; and presenting items for policy review. As this memo is written, we have ~i qht projects which are being intensively work nd in this ra rngory. As a proje, rt moves from the planning category on to cone tructi on sid?, another new of an nine proj e.ct wi51 zeplace it. 4 review of upcoming acti vi lire in th o. area of park de velnpment and ci [y beautification projects will certainly show that, ba rriny economic calamity, tiie pace will rema i.n fairly ^.onsis tent for the next five years with that Curran tly ennoun to red. Fnter the "problem area". Once a project is planned and bid, it goes into construction. It is impe rati va that during this phase the r_i ty have re gu lac and Frequent site ins poction ro insure that, the equipment hei nq installed is what was specified and that it is being ins ta]led correctly and in compliance with the plans. We currently have only two projects in this category, but =ven with that low number, conside ring the ri me demand of the site design function, We do not ins pert the sites at the level which we wish to. Within .ix months we wi 1.1 increase from two ions trp c.tion projects to fouC stretching from Eli wands tc the rucamonga Creek and points in hetween, Page 2 1/2/85 If the same staffing level which is present today is applied to the tasks which are to be shortly at hand, something will have to "slip" either from the quality of the planning side or the thoroughness of the inspection side.. .this is the same problem that Building and safety faced and the same problem that Engineering faced. Our problem requires the same remedy as was applied to each of those problem s.. .an increased resource allocation...in other words, more available hours applied to the task through another body. Two questions will come to mind, I'm sure, as you read this memo. gUESTION 1 - Why mid-year? Can't this request wait to the normal budget cycle? A NSWHR This request fora mid-year position is not made lightly and without due consideration of the normal process. However, I feel the request is warranted. Should we begin recruitment now, we would pick up six months on the standard budget cycle. That six months is very important for the reason outlined above...?n other words hire in April rather than October...we need help now. gUES TION 2 - Isn't there another alternative, such as an additional intern, or a part-time employee, or a contractor? A NSWI?R In our opinion, [hese are not viable options. The intern program, while excellen t, should be aced to 'supp le men ['your regular program resources rather to act in lieu of them. Inexperience and scheduling difficulty make it preferable to take advantage of the intern programs in a more supervised environment. Part time people who are qualified for this job are already working full time, Contractors are not always at hand when something needs to be done and action is needed. The only solution, in our view, ie per the opening recommendation. Lauren, I would appreciate your consideration of this matter and await your earliest decision. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM January 14, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Lauren Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Assistant Park Planner 2~ S,~~I~ __ ~0 Attached Ss a fob description for the proposed Assistant Park Planner position, The description is consistent with our Personnel Fules and Aegulations. Also, the Assistant Park Planner would be a management position Sn the supervisory/professional class (first tier). If you have any questions regarding this description or position, feel free to contact me. LMW:mk Attachment ASSISTANT PARR PLANNER DEFT MITI CN To assist the park Projects Coordinator in planning, directing and organizing tAe planning and coordination of park and recreational site and facilities accuisi Lion, development, and renovation projects. E UPEAVISION AECFNID AND EXEPCI SID Direction is provided by the Park Projects Coordinator. Assignments may include technical or indirect functional supervision of oUers. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES - Duties mny include, but are not limited to, the f olloui nq: participate in researching and recommending park and recreation facility development. Monitor the Park and ReCCeetion Capital Smprovement programs, assist in the preparation of project environmental documentation on a project by pzoj set basis. Assist in coordinating park capital oroject9 with consultants, City departments and other governmental agencies and the public. Prepare and assist coordinating the preparation o£ conetrvc Lion plane and specifications, cost eseimates, materials, and lists for landscaoing irriga [ion systems, recreation foci li ties and s[ruc Lures. Participate in inspection of park conetrvction work. Asaiat in the development of perk conetrvction budgets. Assist in the preparation of park conetrvction and other grant programs. Prepare preliminary project eke tches. Prepare park construction schedules. prepare written re parts and correspondence as recuired. Perform rely Led duties as required. CITY OF PANCNp CVCAMGNGA Assistant Park Planner (continued) QUALI ^I CATIONS knowledge oE: Principles and prac rites of landscape architecture and engineering design as applied to park and recreational area development and renovation. Ne ihods, materials, and equipment used in park and recreation area and facility construction and maintenance. Characteristics of plant materials suitable for park and recreational areas. Pa zk and open space concepts and the principles involved in long-range planning project analysis. Ability to: Estimate costs and prepare plans and budgets. COOT dl ^d to cOnSerU^Llgh pr OjeOtS. C ommunica ee clearly and concisely, 6o th orally and in writing. Perfo cm technical research and conceive park, playground, and recreational area des igns. Establish and maintain effective working relationships and communications with the pub lie, other City personnel, and outside agencies. Experience and Education Any combination equivalent to experience and education Ghat cov ld likely provide the required knowledge and abi 11 ties could be quali tying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would De: Experience: One year of responsible experience in the design, construction and coordination of park or related projects. Education: Equivalent to a Bachelor's Degree from an accredited colinge qr wive zai ty wiU major course work in landscape azchi Lecture, park management or s clone ly related field. CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CIT4 OF RANCHO CQCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECRE h A880CIATE8 ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBOLTANTB RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 1 1 1 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM REPORT December,1984 '1 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE ~ ABBOCIATEB - ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBQLTANTB TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I Introduction A. Report Organization ........................................................ p. 2 B. Scope .......................................... .................. .......... p. 3 C. Goals .................................................................... .. p. 4 Chapter II Approach A. Method and Procedure ....................................................... p. 6 B. Definitions ................................................................ p. 7 Chapter III General Building Components A. Overall Concept .................................... . ..... ........... .. ..... p. 9 B. Major Inter-departmental Relationships .............. ........... .. ..... ..... p. 14 C. Council Chambers .................................... .................. .. ... p. 18 D. Common Areas ........................................ ............ .. ......... p. 19 E. Support Services .................................. .. ....................... p. 20 Chapter IV Department Requirements A. Administration ............................... ....... ... .. .................. p. 22 B. Finance ............................................. ....................... p. 25 C. Community Development ............................... .......... ............. p. 28 D. Engineering ......................................... ............. .......... P. 31 E. Building and Safety ................................. ..................... .. p. 34 F. Planning .......................................... .. ....................... p. 37 G. Community Service ................................... ................. ...... p. 40 H. Puhlic Safety ....................................... ..................... .. P. 43 Chapter V Conclusion - Area tabulations ................................................................p. 47 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE ~ A880CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBDLTANTB CHAPTERI INTRODUCTION CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE ~ A880CIATEB ARCHITECTB AND PLANNING CONBULTANTB A Report Organization The Program wi91 identify and quantify the necasstorsatisfyn thef~equi rementstoft then begin the desi n process, without prejudice, City of Rancho Cucamonga. Cha ter I will describe the planning and operational objectives of the Program and t e oun aries of the work undertaken. Chapter II will explain the formulation of the Program and define the terms used throughout this report. [n Cha ter III, components of the Civic Center will be examined. Relationships between t ese functional and support areas, and sizes of these areas will be discussed. In Chapter IV, individual City Departments will be investigated in terms of personnel, office and support facilities, and intradepartmental relationships. A summary of areas sill be presented in Chaoter V. 1 -2- CIVIC CL~'NTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE h A68pCIATEB ARCHITECT8 AND PLANNING CON80LTANTB B. Scope The scope of this report includes an evaluation, description and development into quantifiable components of all the major functions to be housed in the new Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, To better understand the relationship of various components, they have been sorted into categories of space use and grouped 6y the City's operational organization. _ This Programming Phase allows the Architect to enter into Schematic Design without preconceived notions of what the final form of the Civic Center will be. The objective requirements of the Program--such as parking, type and amount of office space--suggest a number of possible solutions, each representing quite a different - concept from the other. - Therefore, this Program is not meant to be a blueprint for design, but represents ' notions of space, area, adjacency and organization. The Program does, however, provide the approved basis for the types, numbers, and sizes of spaces the design will 6e based on. 1 t ' -B- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE do A68OCIATEB ARCHITECTB AND PLANNING CONSIILTANTS C. Goals 1. The Civic Center should bring together the City, creating a focal point of pride. An aesthetically attractive building and surroundings is crucial in creating such a focus. _ 2. City functions should be accommodated in a well designed and efficient configuration. ?. Flexibility within the Civic Center is necessary in allowing `or changes in departmental staffing and management. Such flexibility will be useful in years to come as the nature and emphasis of city services changes over time. 4. The facility should be planned to meet current needs and future needs. All f or anticipated spate should he built now. Areas not immediately necessary city operations will be areas in which the City can expand into as municipal ' operations and personnel grow. 5. The scope, quality and nature of Lhe building should be an outgrowth o~f realistic needs and these objectives should be attainable by realistic ' financial resources. 6. The needs expressed by key city administrators for departmental function and ' the needs expressed by personnel throughout this report, if responded to, e ations o f it . p or c y r will create a pleasant and functional environment Sufficient lighting and air circulation were universally commented on as necessary for a harmonious and functional environment. 7. The find ings of the "Financial Options and Feasibility" reDO rt by Wed in Enterprises should be incorporated into the Program, especialiy in 1 regards to expansion space that is to 6e readily leasable to non-city parties. i -4- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECRE ~ AS80CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CON9IILTANTB 1 ~ CHAPTER II ~ APPROACH i 1 f 1 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE • A98OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONHQLT A. Method and Procedure 1. Shortly after the architect's contract was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, representatives of city administration, the architect and the financial analysts met to start the basic organization of the programming process. The consultants described the information they needed from the City and started the scheduling of interviews. 2. Program by Gilbert Aja and Associates was reviewed. 3. Meetings with department heads and the questionnaire were used to develop a list of personnel and to outline the areas necessary for the adequate operation of the departments. Types of spaces, internal organization, record and equipment storage, public access and future needs were discussed in detail in order to ascertain progranmatic requirements. 4. Questionnaires of all personnel were used to pinpoint precise job functions and personal preferances as to their work areas. These preferences were compared with overall departmental and functional requirements in determining the various types and sizes of work spaces. 5. Observation of the existing City Hall functions was used for perceptive and actual evidence of spatial needs and work flow. Record storage and intra- departmental relationships were of particular interest, as were discussions with all levels of personnel. The Program that follows is a result of the synthesis of the City's stated preferences and the areas necessary for the adequate operation of the priority functions. -6- CIVIC CENTER PROORAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA -- $ JOHN CARL WARNECHE d A960CIATEB ARCHITECT6 AND PLANNING CONBIILTANTB B. Definitions 1. Low Persons: Lowest anticipated number of persons employed by the City and with office space within the departments, i.e., number of personnel in 1984. 2. High Persons: Number of personnel projected to 6e employed by the City in 1995 and - occupying office space within the Civic Center. - 3. Area/Person: Assignable net square footage for one work station. 4. Low Area: Assignable net square footage for work stations based on Low Persons. - 5. High Area: Assignable net square footage far work stations based on High Persons. _ 6. Circulation: The area added to the net square footage for 80'1 efficiency, which is typical for this building type. 7. Net Area: Assigned area for work stations and rooms only without 20^; circulation added. _ 8. Gross Area: The total area included within the building, including net area, circulation, _ mechanical and rest rooms. 1 1 -~" CIVIC CENTER PROORAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA 0 JOHN CARL WARNECBE 4 AH80CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNINU CONSQLTANTS CHAPTER III ~ GENERAL BUILDING COMPONENTS i i 1 1 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE aE A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CON$IILTANT$ A. Overall Concept Site Considerations: a. Site: The site occupies a prominent corner of Haven and Civic Center Drive. As it is desirable for the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center to be a visible focal point in the comnu pity, the new building should not be overshadowed by the County Courthouse Building located on high ground to the north. b. Climate: It is desirable for the new Civic Center to take advantage of natural light wherever possible. this should allow the City to save considerable energy costs in the operation of the building, while creating a more pleasant environment for employees. Heat and harsh daylight, especially in summer months, must be considered in the design of the building so as not to waste energy resources and to provide a facility compatible with the climate in which it exists. Over- hangs, shaded courtyards, protected entries, and insulated materials are among the devices used to protect the building and its users from excessive heat and sunlight. High winds, occurring frequently in the area, should be considered in protecting users and in the design of the building. - c. Parking: The great majority of users (employees and visitors) will arrive at the Civic Center by automobile. because of the many auto- mobiles parking on the site, it would he advantageous to break up the _ parking areas so as to avoid one huge parking lot. A combination of surface parking and structured parking may be used for the various parking - areas. 1. visitor parking should allow for the most accessible parking close to ' the building with well defined circulation to a major point of entry. 2, employee parking will be provided for 90Y of employees. It wilt be assumed that the other lOS are absent, carpool or arrive by other means. 3. city pool vehicles must be provided for in a parking area. 4. secured parking for sheriffs' vehicles and deputies' privately owned vehicles should be adjacent to the public safety facility. Because of ' the amount of space this would Lake, not all privately owned vehicles on every shift may be able to park in the secured compound. 5. An offsite maintenance yard will house city cars, trucks, and tractors. Space is not allotted on the Civic Center site for these vehicles. i -9- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE k A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSQLTANTB Overall Conce t Parking continued) - Projected Vehicles Projected Vehicles 1984 1995 Visitors 30 60 Employees 88 160 _ City vehicles 5 15 Secured parki ng 40 75 TOTAL 163 310 Employees parking allows for 90% of a ll employees, excluding law enforcement officers. Secured parking allows for all Public Safety Department vehi ci es and for one-third of law enforcement officers' vehicles. 1 1 -10- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNEC%E A A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSDLT Overall Concept Building Considerations: a. The Civic Center provides services to the community and should express this by presenting itself to the visitor as an inviting building with a central reception room used to direct visitors to the various offices. b. Day versus night use may organize certain portions of the building as to the entry area and facilities necessary for night utilization as secure and separate from general office use during the day. Artificial exterior and interior lighting need to be considered for the public and staff uses in the areas, which primarily consist of Council Chambers and meeting rooms. Mechanical systems should be designed to work in these areas in- dependently of general office areas. c. The public aspects of each department should be clearly recognizable to the visitor, while the remaining parts of the deparments will 6e zoned for privacy from the general public. d. Exterior and interior materials used in the building should be durable, simple, and attractive to express the Civic Center's intent to be an inviting center of the community, yet able to endure and develop as the needs of the city grow and change aver the years. Office Space Projections: The prototypical office types following were developed from the typical office needs expressed by Department heads and personnel. These offices are typical size areas for the type of function within. Furniture layout and type might vary within these areas, a. PO1 500 sq. ft. Private office for tdayor and Chief Administrative Officer allowing for frequent meetings, limited personal files, credenzas and conference size desk b. P02 750 sq. ft. Private office for Department heads requiring space for small meetings, personal files, credenzas and desk c. P03 200 sq. ft. Private office for Supervisors allowing for visitors, personal files, credenza and desk d. P04 125 sq. ft. Office area for staff requiring privacy and sufficient work space for equipment/files or visitors e. OF1 125 sq. ft. Work station for personnel requiring sufficient work space for equipment/ files or visitors f. OF2 100 sq. ft. Work station for personnel requiring sufficient desk space for equipment and/or files g. OF3 75 sq. ft. Work station for personnel requiring minimal area h. OD 100 sq. ft. Work station for drafting/graphics areas or technical areas needing layout space _11_ CIVIC CENTER PROORAM CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE • A880CIATEB ARCBITECTB AND PLANNING CONBDLTANT6 ~~ ` oaa OF1 1255q.ft P02 350Sq.Ft. ~~ OF2 100 Sq.FI. OF3 75Sq.Ft. P03 2005q.Ft. ~. o.. OD 100 Sq.Ft. ~~. ®. P04 125 Sq,Ft. TYPICAL WORK AREAS P01 500Sq.Ft. CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA 30HN CARL WARNECBE • AB80CIATE6 ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBIILTANTB L^8 ~~,.; ~. O. G: ^ ^ .. C01 350 Sq.Ft. TYPICAL WORK AREAS CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANC$O CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNEC%E k A980CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBULTANTB B. Major Inter-departmental Relationships 1. Administration: Administration is primarily the City Manager's office, but the Mayor and Council offices are included here because of the necessity of close working relationships. The City Clerk's office, also included in this department, needs access to the Manager, Mayor, and Council offices, as well as Council chambers. The City Clerk's office and personnel division require public access for records and applicants, respectively. 2. Finance: - Cashier and licenses are the public functions of the Finance Department which also includes purchasing and accounting. This department needs proximity to the City Flana ger's office and personnel office in the administration area. 3. Community Development: The Community Development office includes the Building, Planning, and Engineering divisions, as well as the future Redevelopment Agency. Although proximity between these departments is desirable, they are function- ' ally separate and will be considered separate for the purposes of the Program. 4. Engineering: The Engineering Department's divisions of Land Development, and Inspection involve most of the public contact. Capital Projects and Traffic are the other divisions, and they interact with the Parks division in Community Services. Engineering's primary inter-dep ~~rtment al relationships are with Planning and Building. 5, Planning: Public visitors are an important function of the Planning Department, particularly with Current Planning and Code Enforcement. The Advanced Planning staff currently acts as Redevelopment Agency staff. Engineering 1 and Building need to be located close to the Planning Department. 6. Building and Safety: ' the 6uil ding and Safety Department serves as the coordinating and control agency in permit issuance. Planning and Engineering, therefore, should be adjacent to this department. Public contact is a major function of this department for plan check purposes. It would be desirable for the cashier ' to be within easy access far payment of permit fees. 7. Ceunnunity Services: Community Services coordinates parks, recreation and other city services. The Parks division works with the Engineering Department and some proximity between the two would be desirable. Public access is needed for information and enrollment in recreation programs. ' •14- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE k ASSOCIATE8 ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONB[ILTANTB Major Inter-departmental Relationships _ 8, Public Safety: The Sheriff's substation should 6e fully integrated into the Civic Center. The public aspects of the facility include information, reports and complaints. Security requirements necessitate the public lobby area far the above be separate from the remainder of the station. The public lobby should be accessible to the public entry of the Civic Center, but separate from the entry to City Hall functions. -15- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNEC%E m A890CIATE8 ARCHITECTB AND PLANNING CONBULT Jan Mikd7s. Mayor gfcharD Pahl, Mayor V.T. Charles DuVUe t, III---•- Jptfrey King Pamela 'Ari yht Ct tY C~~ r r---•-;, 9 e ve rly Au [h ll et Council ---- Ctty Attorneys 'iS SlStdn[ i t1rY vd ndfjlf ". dCdK~ City Yan a ger gee P."zm I Persannell Cc-arunt;y :eweiDp^ent Def Jack lem irec for Bu it Ei nq E^9i veering P1. d fate ty •err^rane ki ara 4uoos a+a Avila tn! O/Q. C1 tv fna r. [it e e e Flnence Dept. ~ A9encY r r rT2GY.- F`nd n[! it Y, P~,nr. 'i PuD'fc Safety ~ Corun<ty Svs (Sheriff) i ~__ John F.:SC^er .d Dt. D:~~ 4p~~f ty C`.rec :pr CITY OPERATIONAL ORGANIZATION CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECS.E A AS80CIATE6 ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBQLTANTB CITY GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE k ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS C. Council Chambers 3,660 sq. ft. The Council Chambers must be accessible to the public and should have an image which invites public participation in the political process. Separate private internal access must be provided for members of the City Administrations. As this area will be used after business hours, it is important far security purposes that the Chambers and their ancillary rooms be fsolated from other City Hall functions, but accessible to authorized personnel. The layout of the Council Chambers should take into consideration the si ghtlines between council members themselves, and sightlines between the council and the public. The Council Chambers include: I. Council Chambers: 1,700 sq. ft. Council seating 300 sq, ft. Staff pit 200 sq. ft. Fixed public seating 1,200 sq. ft. (seating capacity, 150) 2. Overflow gallery 300 sq. ft. 3. Projection room 150 sq. ft. 4. Conference room (including coffee area) 400 sq. ft. 5. Staff restrooms (Men and Women) 100 sq. ft. 6. Public restrooms (Men and Women) 300 sq, ft. 7. Storage 100 sq. ft. 8. 20a circulation 610 sq. ft. -18- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA e JOHN CARL WARNECEE A ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBOLTANTB D. Common Areas = 4,950 sq. ft. 1. Lobby, display, circulation = 1,200 sq. ft. The lobby welcomes the public into City Hall and should establish the building's identity. It must be centrally located in order to efficiently direct visitors to the various departments they need to conduct business with. A central reception switchboard (augmented by separate department switchboards) will be located in this area. - 2. Meeting room = 750 sq. ft. This room will enable all City departments to have access to larger meeting - space than is available in any one department, and allow larger meetings concurrently with occupied Council Chambers. It may be used as a community room, available to various groups throughout the city. It should be accessible at night, yet secure from the rest of the building. The meeting room should include a kitchenette. 3. Lunch room/kitchen = 1,000 sq. ft. The lunch room is far the use of City Hall administrators and staff. It must be an attractive, pleasant space and should allow for outside eating. 4, Restrooms = 1,000 sq. ft. Restrooms for men and women shall 6e located on all levels to serve both staff and visitors. 5. Employee lounge = 1,000 sq. ft. - Showers, lockers and changing facilities should be included for male and female employees. Personnel, through comments on questionnaires, have requested a gym or exercise room. Although square footage for a gym has not been included, it may be useful for health and morale. -19- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM - CITY OF RANCHO CQCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE A A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBULTANTB E. Support Services = 9,800 sq. ft. Printshop = 1,000 sq. ft. The printshop will serve all departments for reproduction needs beyond departmental capacity, especially for offset printing and large xerox runs. Especially heavy use is expected by Planning and Community Development. This room will require extensive ventilation due to fumes created, and must 6e isolated because of high noise levels. 2. Central storage = 3,000 sq. ft. This area will contain deep storage, dated files and storage of large and infrequently used objects. It must be secure from unauthorized entry and should be climate-controlled. 3. Data processing and computers = 2,000 sq. ft. This facility will serve all departments. It will require a degree of isolation because of the noise and heat created by this equipment. It must also be secured and climate-controlled. 4. Mechanical spaces = 3,500 sq. ft. This includes space for mechanical, electrical, telephone, telegraphic and other services. Maintenance 300 sq. ft. The area includes space allowed for building and grounds maintenance offices and some storage. -20- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE 6 A880CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLBNNIN6 CONBQLTANTB CHAPTER IV DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE k A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBIILT A. Administration 1. Function/Description: This department contains Mayor, City Council, City Manager and City Clerk's offices. The City Manager, as Chief Administrative Officer, oversees all city operations, including personnel. Both he and the City Clerk, as Manager of Municipal Records, work closely with the Council and require frequent contact with each other, 2. Growth: The most significant change expected is the evolution of the City Clerk's office _ into a separate department. Additional personnel are anticipated in both the City Clerk's and City Manager's office. If the population of city employees grows - drastically (i.e., if the City takes over police operations), the personnel section will need more space. This is not, however, expected to happen in the forseea6le future. 3. Design Considerations: - a. special interior finishes and furniture for the Mayor and City f-0anager 6, sufficient and secure record storage for the City Clerk - c. offices for Council ' -22- ' ~ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA JOHN CARL WARNECHE k A88OCIATEB L. ARCHITECTS AND PLAN NINO CONSIILTANTS RANCHO CUCAXON5A GFFI CE : P01. 500 SPACE EOAIaAY POY- 350 OEPi: POJ= 200 AOXIN IS?AaiION POV 115 _ OFI= 125 JOB ii iLE SECTION LOM N16N OfFICE AFEA1 l0Y N[SN PEARONS PERSONS iYPF PERSON AREA AREA AArOR I P01 500 500 300 COINIC IL / 1 POS 200 800 B00 C I?Y NpNAfiER i I P01 500 500 500 _ ASST CITY MANA6 C1iY NAN 0 1 P02 350 0 350 ASST TO Cl it MAN CI7Y AAN I i P03 100 200 200 __ CITY CLEP.K I I P01 350 350 350 OEP LI iY [LEAK CIfY CLERK ~ 1 OFI 125 125 125 C IFY ATIDANEY 0 I POS 200 0 200 ANALYST CI iY MAN 1 1 POS 100 200 200 iA OFFI LE ASSt vEAfONNEL 1 Oft 100 100 20J SA OFFICE ASS? C(1Y AAN 0 I OFI 123 0 115 OFFICE ASST 0 / Of] 73 0 300 COONFEA CI?Y CLERK 30 50 CGUN?EA PERSONNEL SO 50 -- RECEPTION COUNCIL, CI?Y XAN 100 ;SO CONFERENCE 100 100 LIBRARY C03 250 250 VAUI? CI iY CLEAKK ;SU 150 RfSTA00X CWNLIL, CI IY MAN 100 100 FILES 100 200 AEPAO L SUPPLIES 100 100 FI1[NfNE?IE ICO 100 Si OAAAE 100 200 v'F2= 100 OF3= 73 O0= 100 NO?EA SOBi0iAL II 19 1213 5600 L'IACUTAt ION A53 1110 E7PANSION tOTAL 3170 6710 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE A A880CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBQLTANTB COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM O d COUNTER COUNTER CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNEC%E A A86OCIATE9 ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONHOLTANTB B. Finance Department 1. Function/Description: The finance department is an intro-municipal service agency which Derfonns fiscal operations for all departments. It is currently comprised of three separate operations: accounting, which includes payroll, accounts payable and employee insurance; purchasing, which provides a centralized purchasing program for the City; and licensing. 2. Growth: The addition of the risk management function would result in one or two additional staff members. A 40k increase in other staff is expected by 1995. 3. Design Considerations: a. security for the accounting area, which often deals with checks, cash or confidential business b. staff typically needs a work station with room fora computer and typewriter, as well as desk space c. vault will be shared with City Clerk d. sufficient file area -25- - CIVIC CENTER PROORAIK - CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA _. V SOHN CARL WARNECHE As AB8OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CON8I7LTANTfS RANCHO [UCANpISA OFFICE : Pol= 500 OF1= 100 SPACE SUMMARY P01= 350 OfJ= 75 DEPT: P03= 200 00= 100 FINANCE POI• In OF1= i25 JOB TITIE SECTION LOY NISN OFFICE AREA/ 1011 HI6N NOTF5 PERSONS PERSONS TYPE PERSON AREA AREA FINANCE OIRECIOA 1 1 P01 150 SSO )SO ASST FINANCE OIA ACCOUNT l 1 POS 200 200 100 SR PURCHASE AOMIN PURCXASE I I P03 100 200 100 SR IICEMSE SUPFA lICE11SE I 1 POI 115 123 125 ACCWNT TECH ACCOUNT I 1 OFI 113 I23 115 ACCOUNT CLEAN ACCOUNT 3 / OF1 100 300 100 ASSISTANT INSPECT LICENSE 1 1 OF1 !00 100 100 ASSISTANT PURCHASE I 1 OF2 100 100 100 CASHIER ACCOUIIL 0 I Oil 100 0 100 AISN AANASE ACCOIHIT 0 I P07 100 0 100 SA OFFICE ASST 0 I OF1 100 0 100 AECEPi IOIIIST I 0 OF] 75 15 0 RECEPTION COUNTER CASHIER COUNTER LICENSE SIORASE. COMPUTER ROgI STOCK AOON PURCHASE CONFERENCE VAULT Y/ CITY CLERK RFPRO i SUPPIY COFFEE AN fIIES COJ 100 100 100 100 100 l00 100 100 100 700 100 100 200 100 0 0 100 100 50 50 100 100 SUAi0fAL 11 IR 3175 1150 CIACUAiION 615 B30 EIPANS ION IDTAL 3750 19X0 i CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE A AEiSOCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONEfIILT. ACCOUNT 1 1 ~-- RISK I MAN I I ActT I FILE ~ DIR DIRECTOR PURCH I ADM IN I I EPR SR ~ SIC SR CONF6 I ASS` ... j LICENSE i `__ CASH ~ ~ COUNTER FINANCE FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM STOR CIVIC CENTER PROORAAS CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECBE k A8190CIATEi3 ARCHITECTB AND PLANNING CONBIILTANTB C. Community Development Function/Description: The Community Development office coordinates all building and development activities, Engineering, Building and Safety and Planning work cooper- atively under the orchestration of Community Development, and in close conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency. Growth: Space must be provided for the growing Redevelopment Agency adjacent to the Comnun ity Development Director. The function of this department is distributed throughout Engineering, Planning, and Building and Safety. Community Development itself is not expected to grow significantly. Design Considerations: a, display areas for department activities b. provide reception area with seating for the Director's office c. Community Development library accessible to entire department _pg. CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA - ~ JOHN CARL WARNEC%E b A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSIILTANTS RANCHO NCAIlONSA OFFICE : PD I. 500 Oft= 100 SPACE SINNIFNY P02. 350 Of3= 13 DEPT: P03= 200 00= 100 Cp11UMi1Y PGp t25 OFVELOPAFNi Of l• 125 OON TITLE SECil011 L011 Ii15N OFFICE AREA/ l0Y N]SX NOlE5 PERSONS PERSONS TYPE PEASpI AREA PAEA CO OIREC1011 1 1 P02 350 SSO 330 OFFICE SOPEAVIS I 1 OFI 115 115 123 SA REBEV ANplYSi 0 I POI 200 0 100 REDEV A55i 0 2 OF1 100 0 200 _ SA OFFICE A55i 0 1 OF2 100 0 100 OFi1CE A55i I 2 OR 7! IS Ik REDEV LIBRARY CONfERENCE AECEPTIpI COFFEE AA SiORASE REPRO A FILES COI C01 350 330 250 250 100 100 50 50 100 200 700 100 - SUBiOTAI 3 A 1300 1113 CIAC0.AIION 300 135 E1PAN5ION 10fAL 1800 2610 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMUNOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE ~ A980CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBOLTANTB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY GF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECKE k A89OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CON9ULTANTB D. En gineerinq 1. Function/Description: The Engineering impartment is responsible for the technical aspects of all municipal public works projects. This includes land development review and processing, traffic engineering, capital project design and administra- tion, inspection of public improvements, and maintenance management. The department also maintains archives of these activities. 2. Growth: The number of engineers on the staff will expand 60`6, requiring more open counter space and several additional partitioned offices. The land develop- ment section will experience the most growth. 3. Design Considerations: a. sufficient and well lit space far technical personnel to lay out drawings and file plans b. map and plan area adjacent to counter c, sound insulation from public area d. provide space for radio equipment to conmuni sate with field personnel -31- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE k AE923OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBDLTANTS RANCHO CU[AR016A OFFICE : POI= 300 SPACE SUANARY P02= 130 dEPi: P9J= zoo EM6IMEEA Pd/• ITS (61. 123 JOB i1 TLE SECTI011 LON H[fiN OFFICE AREA/ Lpl NIGH PERSONS PERSONS TYPE PERSON ApEA AREA CITY ENGINEER I I Po2 350 350 330 A99T C11Y ENfi 0 1 P0.1 200 0 100 SR EN6INEEA LAMB DEY 1 1 POJ 200 200 100 SR EN9IXEER PROJ OEV 1 1 POS 200 200 100 Sp ENGINEER iRAFFi[ I I P07 200 100 100 A950C ENBIMEER LAMO DEV 1 2 OFI 12! I23 130 AS90C EM6INEFA PROJ OEV 1 1 Ofl 113 123 230 ASSOC ENGINEER tRAFFiC 0 I OFI 125 0 125 ASST ENGINEER LANG OEV I 1 OF2 (OC 100 200 ASST ENGINEER PROD OEV 1 2 OF2 100 I00 200 ASS1 ENGINEER iAAFFIt 1 1 OF1 100 100 100 EN6 iECX IANO DFV 2 2 OB 100 200 200 EN6 iE[N PR0.1 OEV 2 1 00 I00 200 200 ENfi iECN iAAFfIC 1 I W t00 100 100 EN6 AIDE LANG OEV 0 1 00 100 0 200 EN6 AIDE PROJ OEV 0 1 00 100 0 100 ENB AIOF 1AAFFIC I 1 00 100 100 l00 SA INSPECPOB PM 2 2 OF1 115 130 250 INSPECTOR PY 5 7 OFI 100 500 700 SR OFFICE ASST I I OF2 100 100 t00 OFFICE ASST I A OFI IS 75 300 RECEPI IOMIST 0 I OFS 75 0 73 RECEPifON 100 100 COIINYEA 200 200 Si0PA6E 200 300 CONFERENCE C02 250 250 REPRO N SOPPL TES ISO ISO FILES 100 200 COFFEE AM SO 50 SOBi0iAL 1/ 39 1015 5850 C (ACUlAlION 815 1170 EIPAM910N rorAL /evo 7ozo OF1= 100 Vf i= I] 00= 100 ND1E9 ~ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE k ABSOCIATEB -~ ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBIILTANTB COI~NTER ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM I ~ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I JOHN CARL WARNECKE & A990CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS E. 7uiidinn and Safely L Fun ction!Desc rioticn: 'he Suildir,q and Safety Depar tmen± is responsible for enforcing corpl ian ce with aopl ica ble building codes for all construction projects within the city. it does this by inspection. or' ~.vo rkinq drawings prior to issuance o` buiidin9 perniis ;ol an c'n eckl, and field inspection of projects under c^nstruction ±o determine that there is no deviation fron the approved of ans. 2. 5rowth: Personnel is ii keiy to double '.vi thin a decade to ccpe with rapid development. lire nun ber of building inspectors is expected to core than double. .n addition to extra personnel space, more computer equipment is expected to be installed. 3. Design Considerations: a. sufficient and we71 lit space for technical personnel to lay out drawings and file plans 5. plan and permit file area near counter c. sound insulation frog. public area -34- - CI9IC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECEE A A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTB AND PLANNING CONEBIILTANTB 1 i 1 1 RANCHO CUCANpI6A OFFICE : P01. 500 SPACE SUNNARY P02= 350 DEPT: P03. 200 BUllO1Yfi B POI. 125 SAFETY Oil= 123 JOB TITLE SECTION LOY HI6H OFFICE AP.EA/ l0Y HI6X PERSONS PERSONS TYPE PERSpI AREA AREA AUIlOIMfi OFFICIAL I 1 P02 350 350 SSO PLAN CHE[K COORO PLAN LNFCK I 1 PO3 200 200 200 BlON6 INSP SUPER IMSPECI(ON 1 2 P01 125 12S 250 PLAN CHECKER PLAN CHECK 2 1 00 100 200 100 INSPE[1 6PFCIAL INSPECTION I 7 OFI 125 125 Ala INSPECTOR INSPECTION 6 9 Oft 100 600 900 PUB SEA9 iECN I 2 OF3 75 7S ISO SA OFFICE ASST I 2 OF2 100 100 200 OFFICE ASS1 1 / OR 75 73 300 RECEPTION 100 100 CWNTEA 209 300 S10P,A6E 200 300 L!BAAAY C02 250 250 f ILES 100 200 REPRO L SUPPLIES 100 100 COFFEE AN 50 50 SUA701AL CIRCUlA1ION EIPAI1310N 101PL IS 32 2830 1925 510 9A5 3120 5910 OF2= 100 OFS~ 75 00= 100 NOTES CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECBE A A890CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSIILTANTB STOR PLAB L-R« SUPER INSPECTOR REPR Lid/ CONf OFF ASST REC SR ;~ S S' COUNTER BUILDING FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM ~ ~ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA JOHN CARL WARNECIfE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSULTANT8 F. Planning 1. Function/Description: T'ne Planning Office handles current and advance of arming, code enforcement, and grant Tanagement. It also provides public information in these areas. 2. Growth: Technical staff is expected to double by 1995 to cope with increased land development. Additional coup uter terminals are anticipated. 3. Design Considerations: a. sufficient area to store and display large graphic material b. sound insulation from public area, particularly for advanced planning staff c. pl en storage area and pin-up space within work stations d. map display area adjacent to counter 37- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA JOHN CARL WARNECHE ~ A98OCIATEB ~ ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONEAIILTANTB r RANCHO CULAAONAA OFFICE : P01* 500 SPACE SUNNARY P02= 350 DEPT: P03. 200 PIANNIMA POU !27 OFI• I23 3OA TITLE SECT 1011 lOY NISH OFFICE AAf0./ loll NIBN PERSONS PERSONS TYPE PERSON AREA AREA CITY PIAMNER 1 P02 350 330 750 SR PLAIYIEP ADVANCE 1 I PO7 200 200 200 SR PLAMIFA CURRENT 1 I POS 200 100 200 LOGE ENF OFF ICEA CUAAEXi 1 3 OFI 125 123 313 ASSOC PIAMNEA ADVANCE ( 2 OFI i23 i25 2'A ASSOC PLANNER LURAENI 2 3 OFI 125 230 373 ASST PIAMXEA ADVANCE 2 1 OF2 I00 200 100 ASST PLAMMFP CURREYi 2 / OF2 100 200 100 °LAw(N6 AIDE 1 7 OD 100 I00 700 SA OFFICE ASST I I OF2 100 100 100 OFFICE AS61 2 1 Of3 ?5 ISO 300 AECEP7IONISi I I OFS 75 73 IS RECEPTION 100 200 COUNTER 200 :00 S10AA6E 200 300 CONFERENCE 121 LOS 100 100 L I BRAAY C03 200 200 6AAPH ICS 300 700 YORK AA C03 200 200 LOAPOiEA 125 l8 FILES 100 200 REPRO L SUPPLIES 100 100 COFFEE AA 50 50 SUB101AL L I P[ULRTI ON E iPAM5I0X 1OTAL 16 2A 1050 5600 A10 1120 IAAO 6720 OF2= 100 OFS= 75 oo= Ioo NBTES ~ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNEC$E k A680CIATEB L_ ARCHITECTB AND PLANNING CONE4ULTANTB WCRK RM iC .;NCO PL ~NNE~.S R C[Tv LAN pL A:'INER SR PLAN e u i U ASS- ,:,ENT OMPU ~ c ?LnNiiE FS ..ON. CONF STOR REPR OFF CODE ENF ASST ~;LE" REC COUNTER PLANNING FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM i ~~~ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA - ~ JOHN CARL WARNECKE & A880CIATE6 L ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBULTANTB G. Conmuni b/ Services 1, FunctionlDes cription: Ceruni ty Services supervises city parks, recre atior,al, and etlucational activities provided by the City. It is also responsible for new developmen is in these arezs. 2. ;row±h: Four new administrative; technical positions and two additional clerical person r.el are expected over the ne zt decade. 3. De si cn Considerations: z. archives for the historic preservation section of Coim~.wnity Services h. drawing and plan storage area for parks section ' -an- CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL WARNECHE A~ ABSOCIATEEI ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CON9ULTANTB RANCHO CUCANON6A -- SPACE SUNNARY OEPi: CONNUNIIY SEAV ICES - J08 tiTLE SECTION O(FECTOP PARKS CWRO °AANS AEC SUPENINTEN SEC CON SFR COOAO COA SER ' PARK PIANMEP PARK SR AE[ SUPERVIS AEC SA OFFICE ASST OFFICE ASST RECEPilUN197 PECEPf ION CWNSER 5iGAA6F CONFERENCE FILES AFPAO F SUPPLIES COFFEE AX SUB10iAl C IRCULAY IGN EIPANSI ON i01AL OFFICE : P01= S00 OF2= f00 FO2= 350 OF7= i5 POS= 200 GO= 100 PO/= 123 OF I= 123 LON NI6H OFFICE 1.~EA/ LOY NIBH NOTES PERSONS PERSONS TYPE PEASdI ARER AREA 1 I P02 350 330 530 l 1 P03 200 200 200 0 1 P03 200 0 200 I I PO7 200 200 200 0 1 RB loo o loo 0 1 OFI 123 0 123 0 I OK2 100 0 100 3 1 OFS 73 225 100 0 I OFS 13 0 73 C02 e 12 100 100 100 100 l00 200 230 230 100 130 100 100 30 30 n7s 2eoa 733 3:0 2130 }120 / ~ CIVIC CENTER PROORAM ~ CI:Y OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA 70HN CARL WARNECRE h A980CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSIILTANT9 SR 0.E C SUVER 'u~, '"cn I yH CDNF ~~ L_J ~S STOR REPR OFF A55' REC D COUNTER COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM - CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA - $ JOHN CARL WARNECHE k A890CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBULTANTB H. Public Safety 1. Function/Design: This is the law enforcement sector of city government contracted to the County Sheriff's Office. The activities it carries out are patrol, traffic enforcement, investigation of criminal activity and crime prevention. 2. Growth: _ The size of the department will more than double in ten years, with especially large gains in the number of deputies. Besides more facilities for personnel, this will require additional space for twice as much equipment, including sheriffs' vehicles. R kennel and dog run may also be added. -- 3. Design Cons ideratiors: - a. public area should be separate and secure from operating areas and should have its own entrance. Uniformed personnel should have an - independent entrance from staff, allowing for rapid entrance and exit - b. speakers required throughout facility c. special equipment (computer and armory) will require coordination with electrical consultant d. conference room will also be used as library e. durable 7ateri als for high traffic areas f. security storage area for large objects -43- CIVIC CENTER PROOAAM CITY OF RANCHO CQCAMONOA j~ JOHN CARL WARNECJiE ~ A88OCIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONBIILTANTB RANCHO CUCAMN6A OFFICE : P01= 500 SPRCE SUIINARY p02= 350 JEP1: POA 200 PUBL IL SpFTEY P01= 125 OF I= (25 OOB tI iLE SECTION LOY NI6H OFFICE AREA/ LOY H16H PERSONS PERSONS TYPE PERSgI AREA AREA CAP TA IX ! I PoI 350 350 750 L IEUTEMAMT I I PO3 200 200 100 S6i AONIN I I POI 123 125 12S Sfii OEiECTIVF I I PM R5 123 f25 S6i YAi[H I I P01 125 123 I23 56T TRAFRC t I P0/ 113 125 123 SR OEP Fi0 7 ! OF2 100 300 100 OETECiIVE S II OF2 100 500 1100 OETECIIVE CRIME PPEVEA 1 2 OFI 125 125 ISO CfiFCTIVE 6AN6 I I CFI 125 12S 123 OETE[i (VE COMPLAINT I I Ofl 125 115 123 PROBAIIOM OFF i 1 POS 200 200 Z00 OEP I EVI OENCE 1 OF2 100 I00 I00 MOTOAPOOL ASST I 2 OF2 100 100 I00 SA OFFICE ASST AECEPifOM i I Oft 100 100 I00 SR GFfICE ASST AONIN I Z OF2 100 100 200 OFFICE ASS1 6 13 Of3 75 150 v75 AECOA05 200 700 COMINNIICAI IONS 200 200 LOBBY 200 200 CONFERENCE 100 100 RESERVE OFF (CE PO7 200 200 INiERViEY OETECIIVE 300 100 AEPOAI PpiROL 730 900 SOUAO AM PATROL B00 1200 LUMCN AN 300 500 PAOPlEVI OENCE 200 200 iRUSiEE 250 250 NO101 N6 CELLS 223 225 6YM 600 1200 ARMORY 350 350 LOCKER AMS ;200 1600 RE5IAOON3 500 500 REPRO f SUPPLIES ISO ISO STOAA6E 300 500 SUB10TAl ZB 11 10100 I/100 CIRC0.AI ICY 2080 ?660 EIPANS ION iOTQ 12180 19IB0 OF1= 100 OF3= 73 09. 100 MOiFS ~~ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA JOHN CARL GVARNEC%E A A980CIATEB ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONHULTANTS LOCKER RMS PROS RES RVE CLERK/ TYPIST LLNCH F T FIC SQUF.D CAPT LT OMM ~E( ~ SCTGT AEPCRT GYM FTO SGT ^.rv SS PRO /EVIO DEP :N VEN ICLE SALLY PORT CELL TOR TAUS PUBLIC SAFETY FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM I ii~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. $ ~ JOHN CARL WARNEC%E do ABSOCIATES I~ i ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS CHAPTER V CONCLUSION ~\ CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM -- CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA JOHN CARL WARNECHE ~ ASSOCIATES __ ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONS(TLTANTB DEPARTMENT GRO5S S0. FT. BASED ON LOW PERSONNEL GROSS SO. FT. BASED ON HIGH PERSONNEL Administration 5130 6720 Finance 3750 4980 Community Development 1800 2610 '~ Engineering 4890 7020 Building and Safety 3420 5910 Planning 4860 6720 Community Services 2130 3120 Public Safety 12;480 17,280 Subtotal -Departments 38,460 54,360 Council Chambers 3660 3660 Common Areas 4950 4950 Support Services 6800 9800 Subtotal i 53,870 72,770 Expansion 26,130 7230 Total Building Area 80,000 80,000 *INC LIIDIPlG AEDEVELOPLIEMT AGENCv SUMMARY OF REQUIRED AREAS