The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985/05/15 - Agenda Packet ~O CiCn.lgp~ 7 / Qom' ~ RA:VCl q QK.1~tOfYC',A A~~~(~~~ ~1C~A~t~i ~1. F ~ ; L1_T~~1.L1 (977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Baee Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Nay 15. 1985 - 730 n All items smh~itted for the Cit7 Comcil Agenda smst be is vritiog. The deadline for auh~ittiag these iteao i• 5:00 p.~. w the 4edoeaday prior to the su!e[iog_ the City Clerk's Offiee receives all sash itesu. 1. CALL I'0 o¢Dgk A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. e. Roll Call: Wright guque[ _, Nikele _ Dahl _, and Ring _. -~ C. Approval of Minutee: Mny 1, 1985 May 3, 1985 2. Ae110011CH®li8/P¢HS912A7IOIIS A. Thursday, May 16, 1985, 7:30 p.m. -PARR DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Li one Park Communi [y Center. R. Thursday, May 23, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION, Lions Park Community Cen[er City Council Agenda -2- May 15, 1985 3. C~SHR' CAi.®DAQ the following Convent Calendar item ere eryected to be rantioe and non-contrmers ial. they rill be acted capon by the Cwncil at one [iwe withow[ discussion. A. Approval of Natrants, Register No's. 85-OS-15 and 1 Payroll ending 04/28/85 for the total amount of $577,345.59. B. Release of Bonda: Parcel Nan 7891 - Located on the south aide of Foothill 5 Boulevard, east of Turoer Avenue; caner, Herbert Harkins Company, Inc. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $41 ,000.UO C. Apprw al to release original Faithful Performance Hand 6 and accept reduced Pai thful Performance Bond for Tract 9539 for comple [i on of three drive appz oachee and remw al of parkway fence. Accept: Reduced Faithful Pezformevice Bond $ 2,000.00 Release: Original Faithful Pezfotmance Hond $92,900.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 9,290.00 D. Appr wal [o release Real Property Impr weme¢[ Contract 9 and Lien Agreement Con[rac[ from Forecast Mortgage Corporation for DR 84-44. RESOLUTION N0. 85-140 10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TIIE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FORECAST MORTGAGE CORPORATION FOR DR 84-44 E. Appr wal of Service Connection Electrical L1 Unde rgr ounding for Underground Utility District No. 2, Archibald Avenue be treed Church S[zeet end Ease Line Road have been completed to the ae tiaf action of the City Engineer. It ie recommended [hat [he City Council appr we acceptance of the project and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder. Release: Performance Surety 516,520.00 Retention S 1,659.00 ~~ City Council Agenda -3- Nay 15, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 85-141 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TBE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE POBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR SERVICE CONNECTION ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUNDING FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT N0. 2 AND AOTNORIZING TBE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR T[iE WORK F. Approval of joint agreement be tveen the City of Rancho 14 Cucamonga and [he Cucamonga Councy Ba car Di str ic[ for the combined construceian of Archibald Avenue Trunk Sever aad the Archibald Avenue Overlay (FAO). The join[ project is estimated [o result in a saw ioge of about $175,000 far each agency by sharing [he cast of paw em en[ removal and replacement in [hose areas where the pipelines will be conetruc[ed. G. Appr oval to such orize [he impLemen[a ti on of the Special 31 AB Sessment Revenue Management Pr ogr u. fl. Approval to authorize funding of building improvements 49 in the amount of 510,500.00 for office apace located ac 9360 Baseline Road, Unit "C", to be uciliz ed by the public works ins pe c[ion staff. • 1 Ap prwal to au[h or ire an Equity Adjustment in [he Flan 50 Checker Salary Range. J. Approval of ratifica ciao of two agreements establishing 51 cw eoan [e running with the land in connection with Che Hunt Club Annexation. R. Approval co authorize Mayor [o sign statement granting 53 the Trails End District Boy Scouts Perm is ei on to use the Ci cy logo for purposes of advertising Annual soy Scout Jamboree. L. Set public hearing for June 5, 1985 for Env ironmen[al Ae eeaement and Development Districts Amendment 85-05, Ci [y of Rancho Cucamonga N. Set public bearing for June 5, 1985 £or Final EIR and Appeal of Planning Commission's decision denying General Plan Amendment 84-03-A, flAA Inv eetments. <~ City Council Agenda -4- Nay 15, 1985 • N. Set public 6eariag for June 5, 1985 for Intent to annex Tract Noe. 12365, 12590-1 thru 6 to Lands ca pe Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) as Annexe [i on No. I. RESOLUTION N0, 85-142 59 A RES OLOTIDN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OF RAN C80 CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNERATION N0. 1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED C0141UNITY) RE3OLUTION N0. 85-143 GI A AES OLOTION OF TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TIIE ANNERATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AN ASSESS[7ENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNERATION AS ANNERATION N0. 1 TO LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; POIISUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING • OBJECTIONS THERETO 0. Set public bearing for June 5, 1985 for Intent Co annez 67 Tract Noe. 12365, 12590-1 tb ru 6 to Street Lighting Main tenants District No, 4 (Terra Pieta Planned Community) as Annexation No. 1. RESOLUTION N0. 85-144 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CIV ING 1TS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 1 TO STREET LICNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNER COMMUNITY) City Council Agenda -5- May 15, 1985 • RESOLUTION N0. 85-145 7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IIiTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNERATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AN AE BES SMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNERATION AS pNNERATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PUASOANT TO THE LAN DSCAPINC AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OPFERINC A TINE AND PLACE FOR BEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO P. Set public hearing for Tune 19, 1985 for Pr el imiaery 79 approval of Annual Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 4 and 5 to levy and collect as ae samente. RESOLUTION N0. 85'146 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TEE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 RESOLUTION N0. 85-147 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COllNC It OF THE CITY OF RAN CRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSE33MENT5 GITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 FOR TfIE FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGRTING ACT OP 1972{ AND UFFERIRC A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS TEIERETO E4 85 Q. Set public hearing Eor June 19, 1985 for Preliminary 87 approval of Annual Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance Di strict Nos. 1, 2, 1 and 4 [o levy and coilec[ aeseesmen[e. :~ City Council Age vda -6- May 15, 1985 • RESOLUTION N0. 85-148 92 A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY CODNCLL OY THE CITY OF AANCRO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORN LA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 2, STREET LIGRTING MAINTENANCE DIS TAICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGRTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 85-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSES SNENTS KITH STREET LIG HTIHC NA INTERANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, STREET LIGHTING RAIN TENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AHD STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 PO RSOANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972{ AND OFFS RING A TI11E AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO • 4. ADVBQSISED PDBLIC HEARItGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL AS SESSNENT AND TERRA VISTA DEVELOPNENT_ PLAN AMENDMENT ES-03 - A request to change [he land use deeignati on from Mixed Uee -Office, Commercial, and Residential - to Nos pi[al and associated uaea for approximately 31 acres of lend located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue, be [veev Foo[h ill Boil evard and Church Street - APN - A por [ion of 227-151-13 and 14. Icem continued from Hay 1, 1985 meeting. 93 ORDINANCE N0. 161 (secovd reading) 95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REDE5IGNATING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 227-151-13 AND 14 NITIIIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MLLLIREN AVENUE, BEIYIEEN FOOTHILL BOOLEVARD AN^ CHURCH STREET FROM MIRED USE - OFPICE, COMMERCIAL, AND RESIDENTIAL TO HOSPITAL AND RELATED PACIL ITIES City Council Agenda -7- Hay 15, 1985 8. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION OF SIGN ORDINANCE 96 INTERPRETATION - VIDEO ZONE - An appeal of the Planning Commie aiort'e decision to reaff itm staff's interprets [i on of the Sign Ordinance zags tdi ng the placement of lights in the vindws of the Video Zone. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS l0i AMENDMENT 85-04 - OMENS - A request to amend the Development Districts Nap From '1" (Lw Density Residential) to 'T SP" (Industrial Specific Plan) - Induetrial Park for 2.5 acres of land located on [he southeast corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-062-01 and 02. ORDINANCE N0. 262 (fire[ reading) l28 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC110 CDCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 85-04 AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT HAP PROM 'Z" TO "ISP" POR 2.5 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THE SODTREAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND MAIN - APN 209-062-01 and 02 • 5. Noe-ADVRRns® ~eRlres A. ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO TAE PINANCING OF INTEHIM SCHOOL FACILITIES - Purpose of amendment is [o exclude Senior Citizen hone ing from the school requirements. Item continued from Nay 1, 1955 meeting. ORDINANCE N0. 30-A (second reading) 130 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 30 OF THIS COUNCIL REGARDING FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES 8. REVIEN OF FINANCIAL PHOCRAM POfl PUNDING OF DAY CREER 131 AND ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING TAE COMMUNITY PACILITIES TAA RATE ORDINANCE NO. 263 (fire[ reeding) 132 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AOTNORIZ ING THE LEVY OF A BPECIAL TAA IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT City Council Agenda -8- May 15, 1985 • 6. CISY IWAGER'S STAPP REPORTS A. STATOS REPORT ON ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-2 (lil,TA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT) - Oral report will be given by Ci [y Manager. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF VECTOR CONTROL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT C. MULTIPLE FAMILY RENTAL HORNING MORTGAGE PSNANCE PROGRAM D. LAND DSE BECOlOIENDATIONS BY ADVISORY CONHINSION - Revtev of policy rec ommenda ti one by the Planning Commie aion relating to the Advisory Commission's recommenda [i one on land use. Item continued from April 17, 1985 meeting. 135 1iE .'+0 E. REQOEST BY DICK SCOTT OF MOORLAND PACIPIC POR i31 CLARIPICATION OF ISSUES RELATING TO EODESTRIAN TRAILS 7. COORCIL 6HSIlRS3 A. DESIGN CRITERIA - TRACT 10349 - Thie item hoe been 155 added to the agenda at [be requea[ of Mayor Nike le in order to provide further direction to staff and the Planning Commieaion regardi og the proposed tract map. 8. ARIDORRMRRS Hee ti ng adjourned [o Friday, May 17, 1985, 7:00 p.m., public hearing far the Park A Recreation District, Alta Lome Ri gh School Auditaz ium. ~, J .' -- 5 I w q Y I LL I G I <I a U I Z I a ~ r sl < 4 I J T~ U I o I S I U I Z I a I ¢ I LL I N I w 1 ~ I I I 1 1 F Z < K 3 O /t m w ~ w r a ~ a n~ OO-+O N OOOOOrOJU0000JOJOmWJON•p .yO :JOOONiJ m' OOSO ~ Oi~000w e-OJm000W~JOVhOONrryOmu00Y-O w OJWS M1 LL~JVwPmGJOOin +.~.~NN~OmJw•p IAN U~~.~Ort-uV m 00 env n O T PO w0 v vi-N V'hr-tiY-mN m ~n .p .-~M1 Y u~ 0 •pOr w0 •t rm Y'^ti•••N .-• vm FNmN mmm v m ..Y N N N< N •rr '1 ti i 3 k R ! i A 6 k .i N i ': .: i f x M .Y p R k .. k! C k f ~ u i i R i .p 1~ mO•m.'•-•N mYLL1 yFmPJ Nm•f .(•.G r•mP0 •~N m`~'LL1 LrA 0.O ••rN mY mmmmnrPPPP~]`O•PPPUOOVO:J~JOO.•••~•~.+~•y n.•..~.y ..YNNNNN ' ,o ~D ~+W•Omrri-r-rF ri.,~mmmmmw.immmwnmymmmwmmmmmmm N N NtJ ry N N N ry rv N N N N N N N N N N N N N N rv N N N N N N N N rV N N N N h N O J 0 0 O C i.! O J O O O O J O O O p J J J J O O J O 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 J 0 J m `~' ' I Jl Vl JI \ N J m ~J i ~- E J\ ~ r" V L H ~ N U .L w SNw .o m ~n ~ z z ~ <\ s tr N Y r-i ,7 O m ry J •f LL 1 ~ Z N Y ' ¢ O v\ W u y w S W r \ L ¢ U w' Y N s to v 0 O L < P w W Z O VSU w YY ~n •-Y J O J OJ1+ m ~- #N:Al LL QN 4 .] m y .v Yww'.]Y ) O~n 4)U~V~v~ `r 2 ¢ YYW \ •-I W U '.J' W V J Y' Y O W I(~ H J W '.l. Y Z Y w y 'J •r 4 u LL /1 U' W py ZW JY ¢ UY J ¢"CJ ti Yt 1 2 ¢ ON LLS ti Z S Z £ Q< ^ Z L Y < 1 p O V V Y m LL yrn < Q Q !LL W V~ r SEY `+V 3 ¢ ~n V w O U iw i £ < Z Uy £ L w 2 YOLL~wW I O:Z O W W~ SOY 1- V W w S W Y y L WH u P J U V 1~JLL O O W v: ¢ Z N.OU Vf W M ~+V ~¢ w W x¢ O.J JOCZZ 2J.OLLr•I O I F'¢w O WJ\LL<W$ I OM 2•¢M1..1a J Ot<HW Y_ ¢ ZOJ • LL WLLY RNUWw•II Oa00lLLL2 Y1-t41LLQ ZEWZOt W<ur ¢ .I•rJ JU2 1'2 UVZL0 UO O~W<JOt? O ~ I I wi Y tS Wu W 6x ZZO <O Nv.•lOV J W O~h0 N4Y':7 Z ZHp¢ Z I W Z O U t JOw _ S~n4 <~-+ N < 2 fall F-ZZ <¢ii 1~U W V1O YE W 2 1.'~O<~>HW<JJJy1J OIrU /1 J~••~H1~ t VI $ ' ¢ M W S W W Y N V O O<¢= J J J JI J W Z N~ O~ J N W W '. ~JW 3N ~ V U ¢ Vt]"41 ¢¢ y< «6 «¢wOw y1JY l1-<J¢¢ m ' mVi</r i N•.u L LI_ ) ¢LL~~mmmm¢1 wZ <r 2 ~ <W Z •'•Z'w 10 ~wOpLLZhSSW !"•-H HI-W .]~-I~WHJOLLZrYZ X ; MIJ C]S '.M gZ~"~LL rY I_Nl/~ll¢JLLLLLL LLLLZ^+~/1 WT•<EJMN¢O J i W •-O WOOWW<WgQ di w•<GOOOOWTOJf I•~WWwtO<Y00 < ' ¢¢N.n ~~ U:V>Y¢Z1JJ¢J4JOS ¢r3wH=Q 3 J IIVIII ~ o I o m o x v w ~ z V1 W J ~ i- U LL N 2 N U' lD O N r Z rv ¢ w T V~ ` r+2 H wZH Z ' ) ~ W¢ ti Z M J U < Z Y V O J J <' U W W 1Y W NO <7<WU ~ O Z V• ZI S ¢ Q U' m JZ mQ¢w I.4 W T Mr ¢ ~t1 }Z.^J m .r ~ w N ~J Hw LLO <W u m o<o -~ a wrmwq~< Y.aLL rnZ '- 3< Y z z¢ r-~- ~ _ .. op 2 X~Y Jz xw io w ' O W 'J (J V NZ ww< _'rfY Z > Vr-4 Y 2w••• Y T WH <•wJ> I OW W OJm< Z•-00052 Y O t2H HF WMLL OH•- j2f•Z '' NLLJ E I ~2 JM1 O S L Y ; W 2 <r••YrnwJ <SI_ ~i-•.-i WZpQOYOi W 1 ..~OwUrt ~H 2'Y 10 W 2Z ~UW<E2V JOI- .+ it OJ Y- _~<mmZ2.u < -2Q O _J)OJw O OU< VZ ,> ZtJ O NUJ I-,pw -J ZtOU' -E N4Wr-T.nO SJZ7W O U Z .+T JpOJm<T J O1'C .Y w O LL 2 Y O W W O < M W Z SS~-•Y > .YLLw~~W•nNw H0'7HwJ¢SLL00¢,-~+m<T SOH w »~+z-.a wY-< z)b¢w as ..Jam =o<w a ; wES< o .,ax«<oJExuowow<oJ~aa z«JJ<or-i o<au u uc~~-oomSwwn-<worEar-m taoo ~u aw~=~nr < I ~ r-m-+~'+ m NmP•+.rm ..rrT•f l~mmrv~•PO mm .y ~f .~q~ mWmLL~ m mJ`W mmmYY•+IQr ••~O M'+O M•Q I~)~SP <'.~ '~~•0 f11~ mm m mNmmm .rm .-~h m•f mm~ r.~ vrvr~..~.. m~Ynw ~ I 1 L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ Q o ~, Q N L a ~ ~ ¢ Y 1 ~ Q W_ 0 u u O a Y a s K 3 U W O £ H w 1 > I f 1 W 1 I i 1 ~ J~mJVWmJ000U0NJOJO ODD CONO.p~wJ•Tp. .pp70000VJ,0 Om-~mOUfO rJOPLJnOOr~n ,J ;•I .r ,p apJrY.yNW7JnpO.yJJT i(1 ..J .Y mm.pO N.G ~.i ,J .lnNJ (TJ LL~U JG NN '+W ;JtiN J('1 .FN W NJ(~.y .t ~;~ry mmPUfm -+m 0`-+mrsNWmWYU~umvvrv w.-~rv WO.yU NU1J Om0•.p~w .wS J'.y r JNNY m.+T,n Q'.n .(lW NPNPQ'--( m Y w ~ N f 1 I 1 1 WJrWPO•+N m.r of `~rmPJ•+NmYU~..; (-.DPO.~ Vm JLL~•CN bP'J .yN mv,f NNN~VN "fmm m~•i ^lmmmmrJ',tvrJ.Pr v.r ,n .q of ~(pN W W.1~~.0 ~Ji W,~w mmu.:~m~mmm~..u.n mmcmwyW~mwmwwmW:o a,omWama~wmwm w,., NN~ NNNNNNNNNNNrvN'VNNN'V ~~NNNN N'VNNNNNNNNNN'V:v OUJ :,, BOG.. JJ OJJO -~O J V OO ,i .. .JOOJ OJOO V OO ~ OOO JOJ F£ ~ ~ NN /1NN N T- y w£ W L£ S X L +~ ~ w W .u W ~ r .... u ,~ .. ., .... ~ ......r ~ ^ .r .n .y ... .. LL S Y 2Z .Y iY Zz LL 0.1 p[ ~ oFJQ _ w w W w .) ~ W w w +Y .MH I rS 2~ -S~ S 2Mx J .~ J ~ - m s .-.-. t- _ - u __ - J O J a a s p _^ ¢ f r r .. -,, v~ N L r '. J T i.] •^ „1 J W v t m V W W U W ~- y L W 9 w w a (] J .~ zM aua iw~, ~ z a w u. .. 1 i ~ Z £ ~ I ~ .`)i £ w ¢ ~ ~,n aUU V Z ~ >z > Y L :~ C .r P.L .u L:]O QO 0. ~~° < <0.Y /I D^ Z I W S p ~ 1~ ~ V .J I (L J Z N IJ ~n T Z Z W W J ~'• LL U < ,n LL LL n £ Y ¢ H W w I- Y •.:J ~- 4 of !- op .nJ £ }LL WI-2 3 W W > > V NNr.-I•ww~SLLW2(L YOLVI ZJ'S' UQ J<pMZ(WW}Z U 0.• Z~GlO oal-~-IJ wz ~w,~i Jw .(>.u<z 2z.u aN pazz~na~u w,+ Ya.naz<c~nopzuw Wu,zaWW pafo~ Jww zVr-+r,~IF r.J ... f.wwia rw2 S~,Jmaw S Du£Y•+ VJ TU£ir-TLLwJ .<~-2<OS '- h< 71nD M•• <I .-r f x/11- YYUU Z<w•-'0. 2vr pC Y W JU V W $ O2 DN.'1 R'.u2 {w1-OC w.w ~-.~ dW OJLL wwZW w~-+y~11¢rn 2<£ Uw rxJG/1JLL+ <.y>tK1n~22L JL WYJ¢w>}OJytq Wp pJW W W <wQO d.n0< C 3 J<D.-w ¢[* WMw Qp RUw.i iYppVUY£av1NZV£.Y0.i?3U.wSULr•n ~tL<~nnwt/IJVIJU w '~ J Z a j F- Z ti < ~ J_ N /i V N Z U V > U S r ~ >.: Z• M Y ¢ .Zi w .N...~i .U. p V 2 S 41 U u 2 O Y < y ] O Y r ~ V p ~ /~r (n w2 S J 1- Z w U > J ry (y V< Y 4 ul ft<Y V <(~ ~ 0. ~ 0.S < Z /1 .., .~ M a ,n a r z N6"~ SI•~UU t] U~ NLH M L W 1N f). U q<I+p Jd~ LU~ wr+Y SO jK+- ti.z-~ WOr .ni t 0.2 T.t g V LL Q n,t W Jr- J..;, <O£ .7J0. JOU U< ~'+ zz2z uf04 Z O -~ '^"m- S S O W ~Y W R1 O • J U 2 /•• p J p Q J 1--a~y W 4 S U (X 0. "'. uu. L Z.n2 .-J1 yr W'1 Y w Y-~W Q U ~J V'.1 WO:UL K W ZJI-O ~ z<~ -vfa Jw« w U1-LLWQ OY r w0 w.-1 w<wn pw<a< z~oJZ.-.+za qv. o.z~r owW4a al-a~u ~a z£.Y my£s .~n4uoa.. vfza z< az1-.-oz>•J .~V ~fwu ~. -p Z W -~ Jw Jr/+'n Y t7 0. S Z (--UtYJw~+V UHG A L L S.J W JY Z1.npJ p (Y 7 W O~ y y •~ O ~-J O Y ..) r Y 2 Q J U iJ .~ p (y S ,] ,/1 4 r Y r-.i f 4 C]2 JC[ J/1 4'1'~ W'-.mN ~(X W L£ E W r •r. (]i l!- J 1-r-I-r- J W I+p J'-+U ~+^+JW2 W U Z.n rL F•UY 4q <JJ0.1-'~-yVF-V Ufy V U JJJ£LL (X ^'1<0.i+F 2 ~0.(pUJJI-~n W 0.2 Y.;NW wU VJ J J`n J4 W ^•J O <qqq q Qpx=.y pay 0..O pJ pD<W W W W WIDJV~ < 1 4£ O® (O i0 J O] V U U V U J J J V V U U V~ Qt V S U J U V p D O O g D W W w W I T'-N O~n J~-Wym.rmmPPCm-f p~ON YI{11p .Om1oW WI~F 41 N.Or P~j1 PtnPNC • .i 1DH N1[1 ~.fN •+N W LLf ~1(f YNY'+Dryrr ti ~. V~~ W Zcy aONPPNmyTNr••IP I ~ ~ TTT NUS N.. w. ~ ~ ., . L 1. \ '~' ,. II ' O InNm-+pp..p.p r~Pml[)O•+~J JOOOJ TCi00PO ti'YOOONr-JO~Om O:K rl • I i OPM.ym O.ONI-:`I In J~ Ow'1'90YOV N:J ,>O mua lea ©(?G1~'.7J U(•tY ,pPh r I m 2 1 Pmw m W J•OPI-~ ~rO n-In UI"v N YnYY .. u: .~,p .u ~,c).-.J-+u~w.Om 01[)N II• TY Q I Mm O1lSJNYF-rNaN YTNm Nt7(1•Tq~.~. .~lONll`^PN.-~I~YI .+N NYLL11+ .O . 1 T K, 'V .y .-. m .T ,)` Y N .Y :[I nl .J .-I .u vl Y ,r N CO O 1" .+ N C) Y I C I Y W n .-a .y ti Y v ~^ m .-a r Q I Z I I 1 Z II I •pti mPC~I N(•)YI[),pFmO.O..INMYN.un -0PJ WN.n T~I1 .p !-m:TO WNM Y:f ,p O 11 .p,p~p,•)r..l..l~-n-Fr.:-I-I~t-mmM mmtlOW rOmm PPPP.T O`P PP a:JJ00000 i .i 1 ~ maD tLy mymmallDm mmmWCC~W ~mmm ww~~m¢~L Vmm m¢mPP•PPPaP < Q I N N N N N M N N N N N 1 N N N ry N M ry N N h N N N N ry ry N ry N N N ry ry N ry N N ry j Y; OOpJJJOOG:>JJ..JO.:.„~~OOV O-%,.JJO... .. .. J,JOO.~J000OJV U I I ' yl JI VI N /• N Y ~ J1 N D I~ L i Z L Y i£ 5 L Z 2 S I ww w V .Yw w Z I r-~ r-~ V N M r-• .-~ ,.y a I I ~ s Y ~~ Y 1 YYS Y q'Y.Y Zq w Y2 Y' I i wW.yw Www lJq )- I I S r 2S .ZS S U{ Z 2 SS H y 1 J L: J J J, r _J J Y L Y J O _i 1 q s I~ LI w m u W a ~.) v, u a U i w W m IJ w :/a Z 1 ~ 1- ;Y i ~ s z G Y L O z J 1 w a < z ,n .u .+ 2 > L J W ~n L n <r V> y I <V r+Q 1 rlJwJgY Z L.Y 2' Z I U' S T U a .- wizW an •••z s 1 wyao a s.-o~wu zw <a.lzw .. w¢x NI J<Ua wrflr vfwU L LL<U<V~11-Y<YS<T w OM~ OWS ~~ 1 Z<OIL W Z w $O 1- YF- W 2K~ i W Z.nZ UO•~ WJJ.Y myI W W F-Vf ' w 1 iw4 w.-cy OS Y"+Ir ZwZ 001-f J>Mw J•~,72><q.uSgtn y<•-1 ' OI LLL wsV ~/+ <2 ••. w U2 J1Y2J J:-'JWKI-a ~U 1- iZ ~ 1 J 3 <m1-< i- W J Y<vlia9 O2 ww O W W IZ OZOw'-~~W Z W L 1 NJ~. q S^•<J 1-.n<2.~Lr-IYL V' V O S~nNCf 2 xw cA W /f L wW Vw{Uw , w l NJW q'w.D ~2 J Z.": J I-Q W= .Ow.YQ jrl W:Y J:IINI~Q', ,Y 1 W W ZW 2U 2jMl-•O 1 2W J.YyImW W Ja•-O«W J y WO <f wu</Y .JW QwwW O~[ r ~p0 q'Z I W-IC trq PWq a,n Jg2LL <D j2iS ate'-Jq<m~~s m:~. -)Z OS u~~LLq 1 II I I I l 1 I u i u v n ¢ I z ~ y o ~ w s w u I ~ • { yl Q N J C9 I U 5 u s Y < Y ' 1 20U W .- <ul ¢ ¢ ~ Y O W 1 ., v, ~- J J c:+ .n a ~+ u t 1 «?ul .a r< W w¢w i z 1 x£ u.+ LW 2vl zwW o a r Q 1 O ww . 2J t~V 2 i-•1-; W 2 ~V O 1 O. Z W JI H .7 O .u LL Z Y V w N W m Z ,n W J 1 OJN~T'.'J ~. ~/I WYLL. Y O~-+ < © /1W •JW J 6 r2 I VFW T WMy Z •L <ti0 y J LZN J{U< ~ J' W O Z W O N S W 2 W an < J 1 V1 OWO.JO VJ SVf:I ~ f Q~NW<NUW WUF q'VW I-Z N LL Y L U J S S ~"' 2 O W ^ q' / 1 S a n h a Z S V W Y Z 1 '^ W ' I WO{LtiWWLL Y•- v1JwJ O W<Y.tw UIn 339 DWG ><MW q'l--V ¢ u Z w'Rwwwvu «m m r u' s wZwJ w2w Lp~elo i Oww l 1 GH•••QLL JJJVJ Z Q,U 1.- •••l.)Q'JW~JS.-LYLO'Y ~ 1~ Zpq O<t3J~<KOWR' 1 w<w wW rm 6Ww~-.W WLLZ In7¢ZJ VwUq O<gtiWO 'u' 1 2 L J J Y Y .n W W$< y J -< w Z ~ m q L Q m :-+ < 1-. q i i J U 4 J J< J J - Q L Y Q p? Z J O q' Q- J G Z ti Y I V :.) • O M J< , Q :-+'-: 2< Q T ,] (-1 F Z .i •i L ~+ .-1 3; < Z Y d' _J Q Iy N W r. Y Z S w W LL U 1 ~wWSL q'W wr,J /IY <YW JS :n ,'tW W<~-+ bWLLLLr 02U< I W U Va 1'- '- Y W W J -/ a W J /f ,-a ~< J W JI 1"' H= VI $ T Q W M Z 0 J nl (J W N I OZIYO OIYT Z J1 n LO1-r-9J W UU4) JLZLL'In V NJ1.,K V W H ~+IQ T. 1)1 J).- 1 ww WOO<wwD"~-)9222 OW SO <{<<W^^O WWO{~( W¢1••< w•. W 1 LLLLww wUOU YS S~-• W W W -iY ~a[JL m')LLZ K £ ]:22p P66tlI Q'{~¢q' uI Y 1 I, <1 IIIJ.UI-:n wr OYaD^-MWI(a P't~~p Pl[i •+rvmmr*JNmu~~nMI~ rl ./ NY X~11(J1 (110 mN ql NNJ mr-TmmWln l-JIOm L'-m Yrv1~0Ny1+•p.P w.rvP,pJO~r-O.p 11/O~1-.+ I .+..N .. .. .rNUI-+ ..11{~YnW.-. H11c)NN-a v,pmNJN .JA1 N1nM NY NO .r .1 L-. - ~ _ .. ~_ _J~ti~, ... c e c e_= :_._: c~ c c. X 3 6 ~, c I 1 IcImmOJYOJrmm+NYOdOOa)Nm m:JJrn..mOd•'~00`r . I •O~POC)~D,00•+NPU)rrOLMrVOmOU],~OI[)•~N ¢I I-nmmOY pr 1 1 J' L 1 ul .(. u. l•-.(i N•-• W N b L.JYmU .'Im NOm•D bwrymm~O KI '~Y m•t Nm .~ ( I GmPYVI[1PPNNU~.+r P.f .prMmm.p .Y •+mrNY~l'J••ymOb Q1 W I PV D_ •+I[1 ¢I-~rvwPaDmr•~WPrvN NrvW N_ •+Y Pin or J ¢ 1 ~ . n < Y I m W m N •-1 N m •y r N •f .L LL\ .L :f z I N .r < I , I Z ?t I Irma O•-INmYIP..Or~~O•••Nm •I'It~.Or~sJ••I rv t~lY~drmo0 O fY I OVO J.•I ..Iw rl •••.n •y NN VN NNNNNNNmm(Rm mt•ImmmY L 1' 1 PPP Pa aPPP TJ`SPPPPP OIPPV aPTPPO TaaPPPJ` < < 1 ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N '}N N N N N ry N N('1 N N V N N N N U ;1 OUO J..000VJ•+.JJOGJO OUOCO~OJOJ J..JOpUJ ~ 1 U 1 ~ I N VI JI VI J1 N JI 1/• N /1 N N N A N O I I L L S Y i L S L L £ L 2 Y Y £ ,2 1 w w w w w ,L w u W J 1 ~- 1- 1- H 4 1 ~ l ¢ I ' ¢¢ Y ~ Y 2 5 K 2 K ¢ K ¢ 5 5 0 ww W ZwJw.uww w w w uuyy ww wr.l I S S S OS:Y 2 t Sx SZ S L y Z .-Z 2•- I 1~ r - r- < 1- y Y 4 H< 1 O p > ~ J O _~ L ~ J ~J J J .] U I s a r- I U ~1 tJ fY W IJ ~I rJ '_I wI ~JW m IJ tJ lJ LI LL I _ A 3 J I Ow < ZJ ,nZ r p•- I Zm -) 3 ~ 2<LZ I L W Y> L J Q w 1- I ~ L ¢ > 2 w U d> d J U w 1 a o w < a u u i w Z s S~<> I L¢ M N ~ ~¢ •- t V 1 U ~n 2 ., w N w O 4l J ¢ 1 W >ru ..o f-w < Jw J~1w IH<I.n¢ u 1 Hr ~LZ< W a1n0 ¢ 2z I'-•z<•-1 -~ J IY a or V1 I Vl i••~ ~ J C7 M W 2 C] J W •"1 ( J < ¢ J L1' 1"• 1•. U' 7 ~ O 1J L W 1 wl-Zd <J2(2Zm un<¢ O lV ti dJJ62m ~mZ O I wwa~L 23^"~LS LO I aal-a-••+' r Y I N~Y~y JO."~J>U H N ~ t,)GVId <N¢WJN 0141' L I w=>N YJVI-«¢ GWZ u10W N"^P illlw M1101IUµµ{1- w 1 NwG< ¢« w>Sa.n¢J..1 1 2r- rd wwwbuS •-1 F- 1 H F~¢V LLI- 2e¢ ^'¢J IFV Z YrwWJOP tI~••-•w ~ ~<•. 1-K 1nLL¢ZJ ew y HyZ SZw.<ZI-1 tf ^y~Kf 1 yy ON Yr-•MQII-Y NN d~a <ZZLL HI ••IdU^}NOJOU<GW< V I StW«~<O¢PPddJOwr+ «(¢(U<1-•O¢LS ZO ( I 1 I ~ I~~.¢LLt10NF.u ,u •pPWV>J SiSL<L<JNw¢.uu NU(yi l I 1 ~ N U I V . . • . rvv I Z J V :J O F- > J I ~1 ~ V J J ( ¢\ Z I M .v V •+ r I '>- Z zZ2 SU nZ I O W UGOO r•G O . I U V MV1N N NJvI K '., .•n 2 J r 1 I 2 w s OOGOU U«w V V I O S Y O w W W 2 Y w p ~ Y V J J p i n y n I /IHJ ~n U ~ N/1 tJ pM<O r+ON Y 1 1 1-F• ZS 1-«« V WV1 V~40 LS J 1 N O O O ( Z L Z Z N ~ G W Y w U J LL} W U ;.]I Z M U [ I ¢¢ VU Y ~ a¢¢¢w V O WU Z .+ 1Y r.n<w0 ¢ ( I r y1- Q, ;J000rI O 2 w'•TZ Yw( U' rl p[Y 1 WNNGO< OLLLLLLLLCL ¢ • <1"'Z JCS<yMGW l-U1~•r- 1 ~ Z ¢ Z Z N I~ ~-1 ••l i"I M W wl ~/1 1-+ ¢ 1 ~-+ 'li 3 M G Z J < < Z (j1 2 I JO W •-1 rwOY W'.~ JJJJN LLZ V1/1O<2Z i S SO<Urp¢1-1 a.] I mu..GOS2ua(aa<¢s .. you;wwr~uM ayo ¢u I Z¢2' <•-~ V J Vu~ 1-~JN Win W M(NZ•~•-Yd 1 I ww .+«G~LLT L stn v1 ZJJ JSi(OJU.¢LZV 1 00¢ ZZC7LLL (Z 222 ZwT may.. r•x YW J ~n JOJOL . r-I p. .L Q,'wO Gt>.L Y2"SZ < 3-" .AJ « /_ 4 G Y Z L /IOV V U J I v I V 1 `+V u W p> I J 0: 6' 3 U w }¢ W f 4u. ; G J I ¢¢ OmD W w Z 2 L 22'-i-•v1w WF wZ0 •-~w X YU Y I I Z <W ~ 1-1-Z J2> y N .y •-• r1-1-J JZ 10 Z ~ 1 » d ZZ ZJL } G700<J« J{ •'•<2 X NN•-IJ J 2'4¢L O T I c(«JVwoGOOFOK¢ 72 •o< ww2.•.+.. w<c W I ¢¢¢MVINJ1 v1 ViNN /1 N,/1 to ~-F- MJJI.S ~;'f 33;~XUlYV w 1 Y 1 < I rpm m.r.p NON•Orrhra•m.+N U{ml~NmrdmNap ~tlr r*P'r .••~ d I I FYmUr Na~rv n.+••In ~tr-lW NmNm 'lmmmmmN •m 1 Iq .p u).ySN.•IPP ~•+~q.O PPi LL) !~mYmIJ ~•1 Nm mN i[1 N 1 I . . n 4 I I ~_._ ~ _. I ~ I I _._. ... U s J J d W u C~ u -....~I .. . rTmv nn• u e yr un rr -r e uncr. e STAFF REPORT ~~°% s ~ N^\i ~/~ Yj GATE: May 15, 1985 4.~e_ "- -,> iy-- ~ T0: City Council and City Manager ~ FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer ~~U SUBJECT: Release of Bonds f Parcel Map 7891 - located on the South side of Foothill Boulevard East of Turner Avenue DEVELOPER: Herbert Hawkins Co., Inc. 5170 N. Rosemead Boulevard Temple City, California 91180 Faithful Performance Bond E41 ,000.00 J The required improvements bonded for under Parcel Map 7891 have been completed and accepted by the State of California and it is recommended that Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of E41,000.00. S ntmv nc n ~ vrvn rn •n , i~n~•r ~ • • C I STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: !loyd 9. Rubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blev ins, Senior Puhlic Works Inspector ~~......,ul ,`" ~~ ~' + i` ~ F ~ 2 _ ~ 1977 I SU BOECT: Release original faithful performance bond and accept reduced faithful performance bond for Tract 9539 for completion of three drive approaches and removal of parkway fence Plaza Builders has completed the off-site improvements for Tract 9539, with the exception of three drive approaches on Sapphire and removal of a wooden Pickett fence within the right-of-way. The Developer has submitted a reduced bond far completion of the drive approaches and removal of the fence, as we 11 as the required 10% maintenance bond. RECOOMENDATIDN It is recommended that City Council accept the attached 10% maintenance bond and reduced performance bond and authorize the City Clerk to release the original performance bond. Respectively subiryitted, ~6 0 ~ ~. Atta/ menu (D ^_ r ! Yzemium: $101005 R . !t FAITHFUL PERfORMANCE BOND NNE4EgS, the City Council of the City of Ran chd Cucamonga, State of Cal if Orn ia, and plaxa_en;taw.:. tom ~her0in tf ter designated as "pn nc !Pal") nave ens?rec iota an agr lem!nt ahere0y principal agrees to install antl cPr„alete ' certain dezignat ed public improvements, .hick sa~,c agreement, osted 190 ant id?n :if ild az pr o5 ect 0l9 i5 ITC reDy ref erred :q antl made a part nereo ;and, H.4 E9EAS, sofa principal ii required under the ttr.*,s o` Said agr @ement to faro iih a'DOnd for the faitnfui per!prman :? of said agr ee mtnc,fOr Oomple tion Of drive aoproachee on Saphise at 5722, 5716, and 5750 at an estimated 400 squats feet. ' Relocation of existing wood fend at 5722, 5736, and 5750 Saphire aura ide of the public right-otway, HON, THEREFORE, we the principal and rovN..n.+. tn. ~Tpaay as surety, are htld antl firmly Oound unto :na ~n :y nM1 ener.o Cucamonga {neretnaf ttr called "City"}, in the penal su- oT7 apt aN u money o the Unsted stet, .or :~? aaym ens ot" „n:cn um .ell and truly to Oe mt01, we bind ov*s!1~. es, our hers, tu<cest Ori, executors and adm inisV atprs, +dna y and f ever ally, lirmiy Dy tht5e prase ntt. The condition of this Obtig et(on is such that if tv eDOVe - bounded OrinciDal, his or its heirs, ex!r+to rs, idn in:; :r a:prs. successors or assigns, shall in a'~1 things ;:and :o anc @ ay, ~ and v!11 and truly keep and DeH Orm the cov enana, cond': ta tnE _ pr pvaionz in the said agreement and any aster at'~on :h?-!pf mad? as therein provi Oed, On Nis Or their Dart, to S! kl0: end pert orme0 at [he time end in the Mann lr thertfn sD9Cifie d, er.d in all rezpec is according to their true Intent anc -e tr•.ng, anE z hall indemnify and save harmlesf City, its @f!ic!rs, tcLna a@C em0loyees, as therein stipulated, then this 0b1icL: <a r. Lh ai'. become null and void; peherwise, ft shah oe and rse L~-, + feel force and effect. • As apart of the obligation Secured her@by and ~ :icn td the TaN !mount SOtcif itq CNere(Or, trier! shall ~! -~ :I v:!d cps^.f ~ dnd reasonable expenses dnd /e6t, sots ud ing re df an L: ? L::xney's lees, inc urretl by City in sac ct isfutly enfor t:ng sash c ',cs;ion, ttl to Da taxed as costs and included in any judyn?c: -,,ci a:. TNe surety Hereby stipulates and agr!et Ln a: no chanp!, ~ !xtlptidn of time, otter dtipn pr adds :i en Lq tN4 ter a5 of the { :h! v~c~- t agreement Or tq the work tq be perf Armed ther!urtEer or , Iicatl ont dC[pmpan ying the Lamt shdii In anyeif@ "act itf / obtigae ohs on Lhit Dond, and it does hereby alts na:~,ce of any T uU change, lrt enf tOn of time, al [erttton ar adds; L'^~ b M! _ rms of tn! agrlem ens or td the work cr to tn! sPecif~:!:':r t. ' ----~"' - ~1N 'd IT nE 55 'dNEREOf, tMt intirumxn: hat Deln do ly eae v:ad Sy the Prlptipal dnd SYf BLy d0pve ndm ¢d, On mil p6 t90 S . Plana aui !data, Inc Pev to ! i ar any eve aver uret .sa StePOen A. Pa olo PLEASE ATTACH PONE0. DF ATTORNEy TD All BONDS SIGNATURES MUOT BE NOTA0.t IED 7 Main [Fond x9111265 C ~ P[eaium:Sla.Ob _+~~ MAINTFNNICE 6VARINTEE BONG NHER EAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Ld Ii PorDid, dnd Plaza Puilders, Tnc. (nereind(Cef designatetl as 'Pr inclpa " eve entere into an agreement whereby Drfne ip al agrees to install antl complete certain designated public imprdvementz, wn ich said agreement, dated 19 and identified as pro5ect T. 96J9 bwte to ..e c .y o'£ Rancho Cucama^ga is hereby re err w an made a par ereo an NMEREAS, said grind pal is requf red under the terms o/ said agreement to furnish a bond far the faithful pertorman<e of said agreement, Section 16, 9u ar antee i rg dll improvements /ree o/ ail defects far a period of (1J one year after acceptance of T. 95]9 oy the Gity, HON, THEREFORE, we the Dnncipal dnd pE4ELOPEES IN SCRANCE COMPANY as surety, are held and Hrmty Dound unio [y fv 1l~r an n u4aammUppp (here5naf ter called "City"), in the penal sum oP 'CHO~SA: p '190 HuN pRLU Goiters (Tq,29p ) lawful money of the United Steces• ar t e payment o fch sum well and irvly to be matle, we bind ourselves, our he irt, successors, executors and adm inlStr dtort, j0in[ly and severally, firmly ay these Presents. the cond itfon of tMS obligation is such that if the above banded prtnciDal, hft or its heirs, executors, admtn istr ators, successors or assigns, mall in alt things stand to and abl de oy, and well end truly keep and Perform the coven an Li, conditions and prove si ons in the said agreement and any alterat Ion Lheregf made as therein spec if led, end in all respects accord in9 to their true intent and meaning, and shall fndenm ify and save harmless City. its off5cers, agents and engigytes, as therein stipulated, [hen Nis Pbli9attan shall become null aM void; otherwise, it shall be dnd remain in full force ana effect. As apart of the obligation secured nereoy end in add itfon to the fate anount • specified therefor, there shall be Included tosit aml reasonable expenses and fees, in<iutling reasonable attorney's tees, in<arre0 by Clty in success/idly enlercing such obligation, all to be taxed ai casts and Included in any judpnen[ rendcretl. The surety hereby 5ti pu laces dnd agrees that nq change, extent ion of Lime, alteration or addition to the Lerms of the agreements onto the Bork tc De performed thereunder ar the iptcif icatf ons a<comp anying the same mall in anywise effect its obligations on to ii bontl, antl R tloes Hereby waive notice of any such change, extension m time, aittr at ion or additipn td Me terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. (N NITNESS MNEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named on A "1 26 19 85 OEYELOPER SUREtt Plaza Puilde ra, Inc. p ve lopers Insurance Company ~_~__~_~.Rdm2 8y: W' anice An ah im Ca 92801 zs vim// By' i"O"TR~Faet PLEISE ALTACN POKER OF ATTORNEY TR ALL BONGS 5161U1TURE5 MUST BE NOTAR12E0 r L n rmv nc n ~ win rrn n STAFF REPORT Gl:i,n~Y/p,~ ~i~ j ~~ ~. ~;~ `~~; DATE: May 15, 1985 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer =' a`~ i' 19i; SHBjECT: Request for Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and lien Agreement Contract from Forecast Mortgage Corp. for D.R. 84-44 • Forecast Mortgage Corp. has submitted cash to replace the above referenced lien agreement for the future construction of Hellman Avenue in conjunction with the above referenced project. D.R. 84-44 is located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of Baseline Road. RECDMIIEMDATIDN It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the release of said Lien Agreement Respectfully sub tted, ' ,.+ ~~~,.J~/,~IJ~ ,n(//~/,y. r LB Kt ~Eo , Attachments 9 RESOLUTION N0. EA5-k5+9kR SS -x`10 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FORECAST MORTGAGE CORPORATION FOR PROJECT D.R. 84-44 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 84-156 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from James Previti; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on June 20, 1984 as Document No. 84-145085; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause this resolution to he recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: every A. Aut a et, ity er on .Mike s, Mayor [, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of May, 1985. Executed this 15th day of May, 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every ut a et, ,ty er /O nrmv nc n ~ w.nvn n. rn ....n..,, . I-1 U • STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Richard Cota, Assistant Civil Engineer `t`o ~~...,.~oy; <s~ x~-~\; >, ~ ii 19-7 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Service Connection Electrical Undergrounding for Underground Utility District No. 2 The Service Connection Electrical Undergrounding Contract for Underground Utility District No. 2, Archibald Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council approve the acceptance of the project, authorize final payment and direct the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and to release the performance surety and retention. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Service Connection Electrical Undergrounding for Underground Utility Di strfct No. 2 and pass the attached resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and release performance surety in the amount of 516,520.00 and retention in the amount of 51,659.00. Respectfully submitted, r .t; ' ~Y ~~ ~ ~ LBH: ~j as Attachments // RECORDING REDUESTEO BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R. 0. Box BD7 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91]70 YHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cuc amonga, Cali Porn is 91]30 NOTICE OF CCMRLETI ON NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The unders igned is an owner Of an interest or estate in the hereinafter detcribed real Droperty, the nature of which interest or estate it: Service Connection Electrical Underground ing Ior Underground Utility District Na. 2 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is; CITY OF • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9720-C Base Line RoaO, R, 0. BOx 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 7, On the 24th day of April, 1985, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of imDrovemen[ set forth in [he con(ract document; for: Service Connection El ect ri cai Underground ing for Utility Oistr ict No. 2 4. The name of the original contrac(or for the work of improvement dt d Mhole wdt: Oewco, Generai Contractors and Developers 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, Cali Pornia, and is descrf bed as fol laws: grch i0 old Avenue Cetween Church Street and Base Line Road CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municf oal corporation, Owner L py Nubbs, ity ng sneer s~. RESOLUTION N0. ;~., °~ 8S -/y/ R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RRNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR SERVICE CONNECTION ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUNDING FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY Di STRICT N0. 2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Underground Utility District No. 2 on Archibald Avenue between Church Street and Base line Road have been comb leted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PRSSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 1985. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: on Mi a s, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe let, City Jerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adooted iy the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of May, 1985. Executed this 15th day of May, 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ® every ut a et, ity er ,jaa /3 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlffONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 1, 1985 T0: City Council and Citv Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer By: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer ~[t~ ~~cn.trptir 2/ ` j r• ~~~ F ~~? 197 I SUBJECT: Approval of Joint Construction Agreement for Streets and Sewerline Construction on Archibald Avenue between Cucamonga County Water District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga The proposed agreement effectively ,io ins the City's street reconstruction project with the Water District's project to install a 15^ diameter "trunk" sewer along the same reach of Archibald Avenue. It is to be noted that the joining of the two projects allows for a cost sharing of an estimated $350,000.00 overlap inq expenditures in pavement removal and replacement, The cost savings to he shared, somewhat equally, by both agencies. The City will, by the agreement, assume the respons i611ity to administer the joint construction contract for a fixed fee of E10, 000, 00. It is also to be noted that 6y joining the two contracts, the disruption to Lraffic due to the construction of the two projects upon this major arterial street can he held to its minimum. RECOIMERDATION It is recommended that the agreement be approved b,v City Council and the C+ty of Rancho Cucamonga and forwarded to the District for approval and final execution. RespRCtfull~submi)ted, ~ •~X// ~ ~LBH:/841Fj: Atta/hments iY • AGREEMENT FOR JOINT CONSTRUCTION OF STREET AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (ARCHIBALO AVENUE) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of 1985, by and between CUCAPIONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public agency ("District"), and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City"). R E C I T A L S City intends to make street improvements within the right-of-way of Archibald Avenue from Fourth Street to Baseline Road, and District intends to construct a sewer main referred to as the Archibald Trunk within the right-of- way of Archibald Avenue from south of Fourth Street to Baseline Road. Both construction projects will require significant disruption of the normal flow • of vehicular traffic along Archibald Avenue, a major arterial street. Combining and coordinating the two projects as a single project will allow for minimizing such traffic disruption. Also, certain cost benefits can be derived by sharing certain overlapping costs, such as traffic control, reconstruction of street pavement which would be removed by both projects and the adjustment to grade of manholes and water valve covers belonging to District which would be covered by the new pavement. C O V E N A N T S NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1. City shall act as lead agency in the administration of a joint construction project consisting of: (A) The Archibald Avenue Overlay between Fourth Street and Baseline Road (F.A.U. No. OB-SBd-O-RCucM-R078) (Primary 8fdding Schedule) and (B) The Archibald Trunk Sewer from 660 feet south of Fourth -1- / S' Street to Baseline Road (CCWD Work er tJ o. 28~ (Alternate A Bidding • Schedule). 2. The contract bid schedule shall contain a separate schedule for each of the projects referenced in paragraph 1 of this Agreement. Award of the contract for both schedules shall be made by City to the lowest qualified bidder for the joint project; except in the event that the "Alternate A Bidding Schedule" is 10 percent higher than the engineer's estimate in total, such bid may be rejected at the option of District. In such event, City may award a contract to the lowest qualified bidder on the "Primary Bidding Schedule". 3. If upon reviewing the lowest bid for the joint project it is determined that the amount of the bid for either schedule exceeds the engineer's estimate by more than 10 percent, the bid schedules may he further reviewed to determine whether an attempt has been made to imbalance the . bids. If City and District ,jointly determine that the bidder has imbal anted the bid, they may further consider and agree upon a sharing of the cost of the bid items which have been determined to be unbalanced. 4a. Within thirty (30) days of the date of the award of the contract far construction of the ,joint project, District shall deposit with City funds in an amount equal to the contract price for the quantities for "Alternate A Bidding Schedule" as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto, and I/2 of the noted shared items from the "Primary Bidding Schedule" as noted on Exhibit "B" also attached hereto and the additional amount to be paid, if any, 6y the District pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof. 4b. City shall use the amount so deposited. by the District solely for payment of the Contractor for completion of the work for the" Alternate A Bidding Schedule", the shared items from the "Primary Bidding Schedule" and • -l- ib such additional amounts to he paid by the District, if any, pursuant to • paragraph 3 hereof. If pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof City and District determine and agree on an amount to be paid by City toward the cost of the "Alternate A Bidding Schedule" that amount shall be deducted from the said contract price for purposes of District's deposit, and shall be paid by City on the final progress payment or payments to the contractor for "Alternate A Bidding Schedule". 4c. City shall invest the amount so deposited 6y District in an interest-bearing account, and the interest which accrues thereon shall he used by City as provided in this paragraph. District shall review City's monthly progress payments as pertains to the "Alternate A Bidding Schedule" and provide an approval to City within two (2) working days of the date of their submittal to District. City shall withhold from each progress payment to the • contractor an amount equal to not less than five percent of the amount of the contractor's progress payment request to which the payment relates or otherwise secure retention as allowed by law. Said retained amounts shall not be paid by City to the contractor, or otherwise released, until the expiration of the period for the filing of stop notices after the recordation of the notice of completion of the project. 5a. City shall coordinate traffic control, inspection and construction surveying. District shall oay to City District's soil inspection and testing and construction survey costs as contracted for outside of this agreement for the "Alternate A Bidding Schedule" and the proportionate share of soils and survey for the shared items from the "Primary Bidding Schedule" and such adjustments as may be appropriate, if any, pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof. !~ Sb. District shall provide pipeline inspection and pipeline -3- /7 television inspection for "Alternate A Biddir Schedule" installations. . Testing of the sewer pipeline shall be provided ~y the contractor per the project specifications. Results of all inspections (construction, television, air test, soil test, etc.) shall be reported by District to City as nearly as possible on a daily basis. 6. District shall reimburse City for contract administration expenditures for the joint project as a lump sum reimbursement of $10,000.00 to he a final deduction from the interest accrued in the interest-bearing account esta6l fished by the City under paragraph 4 hereof or through separate payment by the District in the event of insufficient funds therein. Payment shall be made with, and at the time of, the final project accountings and payments. 7. City shall submit to Distrf ct for approval any change order dealing with the "Alternate A Bidding Schedule". District shall review and • approve or disapprove any change order submitted by City to District within two (2) working days after its submittal to District, and shall make payment to City within thirty (30) days upon approval of any change order for the amount thereof. Payments to contractor shall be made from the interest- bearing account established pursuant to paragraph 4 hereof upon approval of change order by the District. 8. City shall bid and conduct the construction of the project as a public works project. City shall require the contractor to furnish a performance bond in a principal amount equal to at least 100X of the total amount for "Alternate A Bidding Schedule" and a labor and material payment bond in a principal amount equal to at least 50~ of the amount for "Alternate A Bidding Schedule". City and District shall be named as co-obligees on both such bonds. City and District shall be named as additional insureds on all • -4- /f insurance policies to be furnished by the contractor. The bonds shall be • separate from that bonding provided for the "Primary bidding Schedule". 9. Upon completion of construction of the joint project, District and City shall review the final construction accounting, and together shall pay such outstanding amounts as are appropriate to complete final payments. .411 unspent funds in the account estahlished by City from the amount of District's deposit pursuant to paragraphs 4 and 6 hereof, including any remaining interest thereon, shall be returned to District. 10. City and District shall share on an equal basis the cost of pavement and base removal, trench repaving (repaving the portion of Archibald Avenue over the trench excavated for the installation of the Archibald Trunk Sewer), traffic loops, adjusting District's water valves and manhole covers to new pavement grade and traffic striping on the basis of the quantity estimates • set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Far reference purposes, the construction plans and specifications shall be included therefore as part of this Agreement. 11. Upon completion of the joint project and upon acceptance of the work performed for the "Alternate A Bfdding Schedule" by the District, the Archibald Avenue Trunk Sewer shall become the property of the District with full responsibility for the operation and maintenance thereof. 12. Each party shall indemnify the other party and its effected officials, officers, agents, contractors and employees against and hold them free and harmless from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts or omissions on its part or on the part of its elected officials, officers, agents, contractors and employees in connection with the construction of the project. 13. This Agreement may only be amended by a written instrument executed by the parties. i9 14, This Agreement and each term and condition hereof are subject to the successful award of a contract for the construction of a joint • construction project. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth above. CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT by: Presi ent of the Boar of Directors ATTEST: Secretary of the Baard of Directors Approved as t/o farm: ~' ~ G(%`h~~~~~~'j ~~_ aunse or tstrict CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA by: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, tty erk Approve as to farm: ~~ ./I7 ~L' G .~.? City At orn y • -6- Ro t zh. d~ ~ ,Q • ALTERNATE 'A' BIDDING SCBEDDLE NON-P.A.O. PARTICIPATING (Severline) Ites Esti:,atec Description Unit Price Total No. Quar.[ity (Unit Price in Worasi (In Fi cures) (In F1 g~z es) Al L. S. FAbil ization for Sewer work at the lump sum price of lu^np sum S S A2 L.S. Traffic Control and Signs for Sewer Work at the lump sum price of • lump sum 5 _S A3 3150 C.Y. Renove Base and Surfacing (F) from Pipeline Trench at per cubic yard S S A4 1658 C.Y. Aacregate Base for Pipeline Trench at per cubic yard s s i 12 .1/ AS 2093 Tons Asphalt Concrete for Pipeline Trench at per ton 5_ A6 16,;37 L. F. Construct 15" VCP Se~uer T: unk Coaplete, includinc, tut not l i.:.it_d to, pipe, fittings, stubs, watec ticht pl ucs, excavation, tackf ill and testing at per lineal foot 5 A7 62 L. F. Construct 15" D. I. P. Sever Trunk complete, incl udina, but not limited to, pipe, fittings, stubs, water ticht D1 L'C5, excavation, backf ill and testing . at per lineal foot AB 939 L.F. Construct 10" 4. C. P. Se.~er Trunk complete, includinc, but not limited to, pipe, fittings, stubs, watertight plucs, excavation, hackf ill and testing at per lineal foot S_ A9 44 Ea. Construct standard r~anholes, comolete, includinc frame and cover at the orioe of each S_ 13 a~ A10 1 Ea. Construct Standard manhole over exi sti rg 18" V.C.P. sewer at Sta 3+84.37, canplete, including frame and cover at the price of eac`~ 5 All 2 Ea. Ccastr. ct Ccop Ya nholes and Ce r~,ed to existing 8" V.C.P. sewer at Oevon St. SCa. 13+30.52 and Sta. 16+20.69, cmolete, inc'_udina frame and~cov et at the price of each S. A12 1 Ea. Break into and Rechannel existing Manholes in Devon Avenue at the price of each S. A13 1 Ea. Break into and Remodel Exist. Manhole at London, complete, at the arice of each S 5 A14 70 L.F. Bore and ;acY, 30" din. x 3/B" min. steel casino under the A.T. &. S. F. railroad, Sta. 62+55.40 to Sta. 63+25.40, comolate, with li" V.C.P. sewer pix, ir. accordance with the soecif ications and dr aw incs at per lineal foot 14 as A15 120 L. F. Bore and jack 30" dia, x 3/8" • min. steel casing under the A. T. S. S. r^. railroad, Sta. 115+36 to Sta. 116+36, crnplete, with 15" V. C. P. sewer pipe, in accordance with the sxci_'ica tions and arawincs at per lineal foot 5 5 A16 14 Ea. Connect existing 4" V.C.P. sewer laterals into rew 10" VCP sewer main in Devon, complete, incl udinc but not l i:.i ted to, pipe, fittincs, excavation and testing at the price of each S 5 • A17 L. S. Shoeing and Bra Gina Pits and Trenches 5 feet or more in depth at the lump su^n price of 5 5 A18 8 Ea. (S) ln_tall Traffic Loop Detectors at 4 1 each S____ _. ___ _ 5 (F) Denotes final pay quantity (5) Denotes special item • 15 aY fOT_AL Still OF ALTSFVATE "A" 9ID (w ofcs) 5 (Fi gtir es) 'TOTAL 3iM OF SIDS - FRI..^'.ARY PLGS AL TSFtiA'!~: "A" (lr o[~S) 1 • l • 16 S (Figures) as .. Est. By: B'.dF Date: c~~ V ,, i. C.. 1.~... ~.nl~'.J 1. ~, ...-~~, ..'.\l:.-~ _~~-~ Check BY ~ Oate ~ ~ ' ~ r/': Quantity Estimate °~:Pr~y= Prclect• ESN:BiT ..B~~ ~:-, ~, y_ aer.~s ror Cost Shanng ;rpr. [n? ~' ~,~~^,' ~° z "Brims rv Bi ddino Schedule" 19l ~~ P...~e.. u_ . ~,,.. .._ _ Page _ot a~ . PROPOSAL ARCH ffiALD AV ENDS SEWER AND S1'REE1 CONSTRDCTION PRIMARY BIDDING SCH EDOLE F.A.D. PARTICIPATING (St[eet Const[uction) Ite.:. Estic•atec Dascciocion Unit ?rice Tctal No. Quantity (Unit pci ce in kords) (In Fi cures) (In Ficcres) L. S. !!obil i:.a lion at the lw-ip 5'..^, pL1Ce of lis.,o swm 2 L.S. Traffic Contrcl and Sicns at the loon sw~ price of • lw^,ip sun 3 L. S, Clearing and Grubbing at lu^,p sua price of lw~p sun 4 11E Ea. Adjust Watec Valve Cans at eaci 8 ~7 • 5 58 Sa. Adjust Na nhole Frz.T,es and Covers to Grade at each 5 5 6 19,888 C.Y. ,;') Re~ove Bz se znd Su [f acing at per C~b1C yard $ $ 7 16,761 S.Y. Plane Asphalt Concrete at per square yard 5 5 8 11,133 C.Y. Aceceeate Base at • per cubic yard 5 5 9 24,837 Tans Asphalt Concrete at per ton S S 10 109 L.F. Place A.C. Rolled Becm at per linear fop[ 5 5 11 679 L. F. Curb Only per Std. No. 301 at per linear foot 5 5 • 9 aQ 12 1, 838 L. :'. Curs and Gutter per Std. No. 3 03 at ixr linear foot 5 S, 13 40 L. F. Concrete Street Gv erflow Deflector oer Std. No. 31b at per linear foot 5 5 14 39 L.F. Parkway Runoff Deflector per Std. No. 317 at per linear foot 5 5 • 15 3,679 S. F. Construct Spandrels, Cross Gutters and Drive Approaches per City Stds. at per square yard 5 16 34,283 S. F. Construct Sidewalks and Wheelchair Ranps per City Stds. at per square yard 5 10 ~9 17 60 Ea. (5) Install 6' x 6' Traffic Loo_o • Detector at each S S 18 2,145 S.Y. Pav em,ent ReirFOrcing Fabric at per square yard S S 19 136 L. F. Construct Ty ce 0-2 Ma~dif ied Curs per detail at per lineal foot S S 20 L. S. Pavement b;ar king and Striping at the ltanp scan price of lu^np sum S 5 ROTAL SUM OF PRINARY BID (WOC as ) 5 (Fi cur es) 11 • 30 r 1 LJ • L~ .. _ ... ._.. ...... ... ........,..... ~\~nn10 STAFF REPORT Z~i~~~ , x x~: May I5, 1965 ~ ~~G IVii T0: Mayor and Members of City Council ~/, FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager i SUBJECT: Implementation of Special Assessmenl~Revenue Management Program Attached are two staff reports regarding the establishment of a special assessment revenue management program. The first describes the need, justification, and proposed plan to implement this program; while, The second provides the class specifications and recommended salary ranges for the assessment revenue function. It is recommended the City Council authorize the implementotion of the Special Assessment Revenue Management Program which would entail the following four actions To take place: I. Establish o seven percent (7%) overhead operational factor for all special assessment districts, lighting and maintenance, and Mello-Roos programs. 2. Staffing of special assessment revenue management program as follows: Assessment Revenue Coordinator, Assessment Revenue Arwlyst, Assessment Revenue Technician, and Assistant City Manager (reclassification). 3. Approval of class specifications for Assessment Revenue staff and recommended salary ranges. 4. !mplementation of program beginning with recruitment of Assessment Revenue Coordinator beginning May, 1985. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, feel free to contact me. LMW:mk 3/ • • C[TY OF RANCHO CliCA:VIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 13, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager SUBJECT: SPECIAL FEVENUE ANO INFORMATION SYSTEMS fN1NAGEMEUT STAFFING PROPOSAL <<ca.~ro `~J.~_ 9 ~;~i~' =~Y\ } 'z ~, Z __ __ > In77 I OBJECTIVE: To develop a special revenue management program which administers special assessments, maintenance districts and Mello- Roos revenue programs. This program would ensure efficient, unified and continuous operation of varied revenue assessments and bond servicing programs. PROBLEM STATEMENT: The City has utilized numerous special financing programs to meet the maintenance and various service needs of the community. These programs range from maintenance and street light- ing districts to special assessment districts, and the Mello-Roos programs. These activities will become more complex as the commu- nity grows. Management needs begin when public hearings are com- pleted. Each program generates a need for continuous monitoring and management to ensure that bond servicing, delinquency oversight, annual assessment spread calculations, assessment changes and other complex data are managed in a uniform manner. The initial special financing programs have grown to a level which requires management to safeguard their continued success. Each of these programs re- quires continuous monitoring as well as data maintenance, multi- agency and departmental interface. This will keep the assessments on track and ensure a =_teady revenue stream. The existing programs are currently "monitored" by a Public Service Technician in the Engineering Division using a word processor. This accounting system is inadequate and there is no actual management of the funds. This procedure is becoming unworkable. The landscap- ing and lighting district revenue receipts far 1985-86 will be approximately 51 million with over 11,000 parcels overlapping. As these maintenance districts grow, so will the management prob- lems. These 8istr is is alone create a tremendous management need that exceeds the ability of one person to manage. Soon the Day Creek Mello-Roos project, (an unprecedented local program) will add another significant layer of data management and administrative needs. Further, if the Parks Assessment District is implemented, the City will have a need to maintain assessments for that program. 3s R&I Systems Management Staffing Proposal March 13, 1985 Page Two • Hiring staff for these programs in separate departments would result in a confusing and fragmented management system with very little cen- tral accountability. The duplication and use of similar data for different assessment programs could result in erroneous assessments, uncoordinated delinquency programs, and other mistakes that not only jeopardize the smooth operation of a program but result in poor public relations. Therefore, it is essential that the tax management program be closely supervised by the City Manager and City Council. It is proposed that the Assistant to the City Manager 6e reclassified to the position of Assistant City Manager. The duties for this position will be redefined to include direct supervision of Lhe tax management program. The assistant City Manager will have the primary supervisory responsibilities for the information systems program and personnel. PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION: The creation of a three person special revenue and information system management function in the City Manager's office is recommended. This function will avoid fragmentation by use of a single source of data management. Since the operation of all these special programs is dependent upon the foundation of a parcel based or geobased information • system, the creation of this recommended function should be timed with the Community Development Department's development of a parcel based system. from this parcel base information system all the data needs will 6e unified and managed by a program center accountable to the City Manager's office. This alleviates the problem of duplicating program management and allows the Planners and Engineers to build ±he improvements and manage construction contracts. In addition the Community Services Department will be able to build parks without being encumbered by duplication or lack of unified oversight on the tedious details of tax and assessment management. idore specifically, the new program center will perform the following tasks: - Maintain the parcel base system and keep the system updated so that all tax and assessment information is accurate and uniform - Maintain all land use data changes with respect to the method of spreading assessments or taxes - Determine the annual assessment district schedule of payments and assessment spreads - Determine the annual assessments for landscape and lighting • districts - Determine the annual tax for Mello-Roos programs 33 R8I Systems Management Sa tffing Proposal March 13, 1985 Paae Three - Monitor all the assessment and tax payments and initiate and manage a collection program - Create and manage a delinquency program to recoup delinquent assessments Manage tax notification program - Interface with the County Auditor/Controller's office on all City assessments and tax records - Verify all tax tapes with assessment engineers - Manage the bond servicing program and work with ali bond trustees - Maintain weekly update of changes for land subdivisions and ownership changes and modify assessment spreads on assessment changes - Prepare all public hearing data and information on revenue • and cost such that City Council will have accurate parcel data for setting ra te5 and charges - Develop and maintain continual assessment forecasts for budgeting and management purposes - Ensure compatible data for digitized mapping purposes by working with City departments and City selected mapping service - Input all assessments and lein information into management reports for the creation of special assessment districts and Mello-P,oos programs - Keep operational all computer programs for the geoba5 ed parcel data system and tax management program PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION The implementation of this program will follow the hiring schedule below: Revenue/information systems manager July 1985 Reclassify Assistant to City Manager position to Assistant City P+a nag er (reassign duties July 1985 as needed) ~y R6I Systems Management Staffino Proposal March 13, 1985 Page Four Program Analyst January 1986 Data Processing Technician July 1986 Hiring schedules reflect anticipated implementation of the geobased system and timing of transactions of assessment district and Mello- Roos management needs. There will be no need for separate staffing requests financed by the General Fund. PROGRAM FUNDING: • While the special assessment districts, maintenance districts and Mello-Roos programs have been established, no management pro9 ram has been formally created. Given the current collection of revenues far all existing special financing districts, a seven percent (7ffi) over- head factor will adequately fund a revenue management system. Current estimates of annual revenue will produce ~ 5200,000. Part of the program is currently absorbed through the General Fund and other portions are handled by consultants. The seven percent overhead factor on the existing and future programs will eliminate the re- liance on the General Fund, unify the fragmented administration of the various special revenue programs, and replace the current management programs with one comprehensive program. This will free • up other departments from the revenue management tasks and maximize the usefulness of the parcel based information system. RE COP4AENDATION: Establish a seven percent (7°) overhead operational factor for all special assessment districts, Lighting and mainte- nance districts and Mello-Roos programs; 2. Authorize staffing as previously outlfned, including super- vision within the City Manager's office; and 3. Authorize implementation of the above beginning with re- cruitment of the Special Revenue and Information Systems Manager beginning in P.pril 1985. Class specifications and salary recomnendat ions will be provided to the City Council within 30 days. Respectfully submitted, Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager LMW:jk • 3s May I S, 1985 L~ Gs{p ~~~ ~9, >; ) ~ ~ i~ z^ G k L w-~ I ---- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA~tONGA STAFF REPORT TO: Lauren Wasserman City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant to City Manage n U • SUBJECT: Assessment Revenue Class Specifications and Salary Recommendations Attached ore the class specifications for the four positions necessary to implement the assessment revenue function described in your staff report (3/13/85). Each class specification was developed within the parameters given in your staff report; also, a review of similar positions was performed to insure all duties of the jobs were addressed. The salary rouge recommendations and projected hire dates for the positions would be as follows: Position Salary Hire Date Assessment Revenue Coordinator $2,771-$3,556 7/85 Assistant City ManagerX $3,139-$4,439 7(85 (reclass) Assessment Revenue Analyst` $2,386-$3,062 1/86 Assessment Revenue Technician $1,478-$1,897 7/Bb "Denotes Executive Management Class 'Denotes Management Class 'Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, feel free to contact me. RAR:mk 36 • ASSESSMENT REVENUE COORDINATOR DEFINITION To plan, supervise, manage, and direct the provision o[ assessment revenue services to various City departments, and to provide highly technical end responsible staff assistance in the areas of automated information systems and assessment revenue management and organization. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Direction is provided by the Assistant City Manager. Exercises direct and indirect supervision of professional, technical, and clerical staff as fl551gned. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES -Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Develop end implement goals, objectives, policies, end priorities of Assessment Revenue Section. Plan, schedule and control the work o[ Assessment Revenue Section. • Establish overall automation priorities; coordinate systems, and programming studies end procedural developments. Provide assessment revenue staff assistance to aD departments; analyze and recommend Changes in administrative and office procedures; perform statistical analyses. Menage the parcel base information system and keep the system updated so that all tax, parcel, end assessment information is accurate and uniform. Manage all land use data changes with respect to the method of spreading assessments or taxes. Plan the annual assessment dishict schedule o[ payments and assessment spreads. plan the annual assessments for landscape and lighting districts. Plan the annual tax Por Mello-Roos programs, Menage assessment and tax notification program. Menage all assessment and tax payments; initiate and manage a collection program. Menage delinquency payment program. Interface with the County Auditor/Controller's office on ell City assessments and tax records. 37 Supervise verification of ell [ex tapes with assessment engineers. . Menage bond servicing program end work with bond trustees. Direct the preparation of changes for lend subdivisions and ownership changes and modify assessment spreads on assessment changes. Direct the preparation of public hearing data end information on revenue end cost such that City Council will have accurate parcel data for setting rates and charges. Menage continual assessment forecasts for budgeting and management purposes. Direct the input of aLL assessments and lain information into management reports for special assessment districts and Mello-Roos programs. Plan the operation of ell computer programs for the geobased parcel data system and tax management program. May participate in meetings before citizens, elected officials, commissions on assessment revenue and fiscal matters of the City. Select, supervise, train end evaluate assigned personnel. Prepare and administer the section's budget. Perform related duties a9 assigned. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Principles end techniques of information systems development, program planning, and computer programming end processing, including machine scheduling, forms design end control requirements. Methods of analyzing cost vs. benefit of various administrative and work system alternatives, including cost determination end analysis, and productivity measurement. Computerized information processing systems, including machine capabilities end applications potential. Alternative work process and administrative systems, including both manual end computerized systems. Principles and techniques for work planning, scheduling, measurement end reporting. Principal programming languages, job control language, software packages, and operating system utilities. • Principles end practices of organization, budget, end personnel management. • 38 • Ability to: Plan, assign, supervise, and review information systems analysis, design, end programming activities end computer operations. Analyze complex administrative and information systems, identify problems, and develop logical conclusions end effective solutions. Coordinate, direct, and supervise systems analysis, design, and programming. Prepare work plans end time estimates for projects and proposed systems. Evaluate alternative administrative end data processing systems, including preparation of time end cost estimates. Conduct cost vs. benefit analyses. Develop end recommend cost effective technical system improvements. Read, interpret, end apply complex technical publications, manuals, and other documents. Establish end maintain effective working relationships with staff of user departments end personnel of assessment revenue section. Provide concise, logical written and oral reports and correspondence regarding • systems maintenance and development activities involving complex tecMical and administrative problems end proposed solutions. Communicate effectively in both technical rnd non-technical terms, Document procedures and provide training for information systems staff and users on implementation and operation requirements. Experience and Education Any combination equivalent to experience and education that could likely provide the required knowledge end abilities would be qualifying. Atypical way to obtain the knowledge end abilities would be: Experience Four years of progressively responsible experience in assessment coordination, fiscal management, date processing, and accounting work including administrative end supervisory experience. Education: Equiveleni to a Bachelor's Degree from an accredited college or university with major course work in fiscal management, computer science, acrnwt- ing, business administration, public administration, or related field. r1 39 ASSESSMENT REVENUE ANALYST • DEFINITION To perform and supervise complex and highly technical work involving assessment revenue services pertaining to design, programming, testing, installation and maintenance of automated information systems; plan, organize, assign, review and approve assement revenue programming specifications. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Direction is provided by the Assessment Revenue Coordinator. Exercises direct and indirect supervision over assessment revenue section, professional, technical, end clerical staff as assigned. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES -Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Prepare parcel base information system and maintain on an ongoing basis to insure all tracts, parcels, and assessment information is accurate and uniform. Prepare land use data changes with respect to method of spreading assessments or taxes. Prepare annual assessment district schedule of payments end assessment spreads. Prepare annual assessment for landscape and lighting districts. • Supervise the assessment and tax payment programs. Prepare annual tax for programs. Prepare delinquency payment program. Prepare verification of eR tax tapes with assessment engineers. Assist in managing bond servicing program end work with bond trustees. Prepare changes for land subdivisions and ownership changes end modify assessment spreads on assessment changes. Prepare public hearing data end information on revenue and cost such that City Council will have accurate parcel data for setting rates and charges. Assist in managing continual assessment forecasts [or budgeting end management purposes. Prepare the input of ell assessments and Iein information into management reports for special assessment districts and Mello-Roos programs. May assist in participation in meetings before citizens, elected officials, commissions on assessment revenue and fiscal matters oP the City. • Assist in preparing end administering the section's budget. yo • Supervise end participate in the development of computer programs based on assessment revenue and automated information systems requirements; document programs in accordance with established standards and practices. Supervise and participate in the design and preparation of test tlata Por proper testing of computer programs and development of new systems prior to implementation. Schedule programming projects and assign projects to programming staff, monitor and report on status o4 projects in progress. Review and approve projects tests, debugging, and implementation as programs are developed for production as problems are identified. Meet with aR effected departments to determine changes necessary to update existing systems, end supervise and perform modifications as necessary. Design forms for the assessment revenue section and users including report layouts, input documents, end data file layouts. Advise and train other assessment revenue personnel on new applications, equipment, and software products. Perform related duties as assigned. QUALIFICATIONS . Knowledge of: Principles in computer systems end procedures analysis and design. Principles and techniques of complex end technical programming, processing and programming documentation. Use, capability, c.,..r~eteristics and limitation of City's computer end related equipment. Record storage and handling techniques. Computer logic end mathematics. Ability to: Assist en automated information systems processing end procedure analysis, design, end feasibility studies, Perform complex and difficult information systems processing. Analyze, design, program, and install and maintain highly technical and complex programs. C J N/ Read end interpret and apply complex technical publications, manuals end other • documents. Keep abreast of current changes and advancement in information processing industry. Effectively manage projects, including maintenance schedules, timetables Por projectr assigned to support a personnel and reports on status projects. Establish end maintain effective working relationships with other departments, and personnel o[ assessment revenue section. Communicate effectively in technical and nontechnical terms. Experience end Education Any combination equivalent to experience end education that coWd likely provide the required knowledge and abilities would be qualitying. Atypical way to obtain [he knowledge end abilities woWd be: Experience: Three years of increasingly responsible experience N assessment revenue, fiscal management, data processing, and accounting work, preferrebly including some supervisoriel experience. Education: Equivalent to a Bachelor's Degree from an accredited college or university • with major course work in fiscal management, computer science, account- ing, business administration, public administration, or related field. VS ASSESSMENT REVENUE 'CECHNICIAN DEPiNITION To perform a variety of technical and skilled tasks in the operation of automated information processing equipment; to perform data control and verification activities as assigned; and to perform systetn documentation. SUPERVISION RECEIYED AND EXERCISED Receives general supervision from the Assessment Revenue Coordinator. Technical and functional supervision may be provided by higher level professional personnel. No supervision is exercised. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES -Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Operate computer and related equipment. Monitor end keep logs on batch processing and on-line processing jobs. Assist in establishing schedules of repetitive production jobs to meet schedules of assessment program, • Assist in solving problems rotated to data an the computer; suggest alternative methods of operations. Determine necessary preventive and corrective equipment maintenance; perform routine maintenance and cleaning of computer hardware as necessary. Recognize problems in hardware and software malfunctions. Modify existing application systems programs under supervision to meet needs and system design changes. Maintain and update Piles and manuals. Maintain problem logs, indicating specific problems. Follow standard procedures end written instructions in operating the computer equipment. Perform a variety of data control tasks as assigned, including verification o[ information end balancing amounts shown on [inanciat reports. Discuss and resolve a variety of data processing problems with departments over the telephone, giving general instructions for operations end procedures. Maintain inventory of computer paper and materials. Y3 EXAi11PLE5 OF DUTIES Sort, burst, and collate reports and herd copy as required. • Perform basic and entry-level programming. Assist in general clerical, recordkeeping, research and accounting functions of the Assessment Revenue Section. Perform related duties es assigned. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Computer documentation procedures. Operating system commands and concepts. Computer and peripheral equipment maintenance methods and procedures. Basic programming, data processing, and basic programming documentation techniques. Emergency procedures. Ability to: • Undersiend end follow programmer's instructions, flow charts end documentation. Read, interpret, end apply technical manuals and documents. Learn primi data processing equipment. Learn and understand data processing concepts. Identity, evaluate and solve basic program problems. Troubleshoot machines or program difficulties. Schedule work end work within time limits and deadlines. Communicate e[teetively with users, orally end in wciting. Keep accurate logs, records and reports. Analyze data and develop logical solutions related to operating problems. Skirls: Operate the multiple computer systems, communications, and peripheral equipment. . Operate data entry equipment. Y'! • Experience and Educatoon Any combination equivalent to experience end education that could likely provide the required knowledge and abilities woWd be qualifying, Atypical way to obtain [he knowledge end abilities would be: Experience Two years directly-related general automated information processing experience with additional background in reeordkeeping, research, end accounting. Education Equivalent to completion of twelfth grade, including or supplemented by general automated information processing training. • ~/ S • ASSISTANT CITY S7ANAGER nrrc~ru~mtnN To perform responsible management analysis and administrative coordination work Cor City Manager in managing the City's overeR services and operations; administer personnel system; and direct Assessment Review function. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Administrative direction is provided by the City Manager. Responsibilities include direct end indirect supervision of management, professional, technical and clerical postions. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES -Duties may include, but ere not limited, to the following: Assist in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies and priorities. Perform comprehensive management analysis in a wide range of municipal policies, organization, procedures, finance end services. Assist the City Manager in coordinating interdepartmental operations and reviewing • internal affairs of the City's organization. Directs operation of Assessment Revenue function. Analyze, interpret and explain City policies end procedures. Represent the City before the City Council, community, outside agencies and professional meetings as required. Mey serve es Acting City Manager in his/her absence. Administer the City's Personnel system, including administration and interpretation of personnel rules and regulations, recruitment, selection, end classification end compensation plans. Participate in a variety o[ employee relations activities es required. Investigate end prepare reports on specific requests and complaints pertaining to various governmental activates. Serve es staff liaison and Secretary to Advisory Commission. Prepare end administer a variety of service contracts with outside providers, including cable television, solid waste collection, and public transportation. Confer with members of the public to explain policies and programs. Participate in the preparation end review of the City's annual budget. yG Gather and analyze data on existing programs, conduct surveys and prepare proposals including financing, staffing, end organization requirements. • Neat with individual members of the City Council to discuss a variety of City issues. Represent [he City in the community and at professional meetings es required. Act as Affirmative Action Officer for the City. Respond to citizen complaints and requests for information. Assist in the coordination of activities o[ the City Manager's office, with City departments and divisions, and with outside agencies. Perform related duties as required. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Principles and practices of organization, management, supervision review end analysis. Prinicples, methods and practices of municipal finance, budgeting and accounting. Federal, State and local laws, rules end regulations pertaining to local government operations. • Advanced methods and techniques of contract development end administration. Advanced research techniques, sources and availability of information, end methods of report presentation. Ability to: Analyze a variety of administrative and organizational problems end make sound policy end procedural recommendation. Make effective public presentations. Properly interpret end make decisions in accordance with laws, regulations, and policies. Plan, organize end successtuLLy implement complex projects and assignments. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with others. Manage, supervise, train end evaluate assigned personnel. Administer a public personnel system in en effective manner. Analyze a variety of administrative problems end make sound policy end procedural recommendations. • y7 Prepare and administer a variety of public service contracts. • Commwicate clearly end concisely, both orally end in writing. Properly interpret and make decisions in accordance with laws, regulations and policies. Prepare complete and accurate reports. Experience end Education Any combination equivalent to experience and education that could likely provide the required knowledge and abilities would be qualifying. Atypical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Experience Five years of increasingly responsible administrative experience in municipal government. Education: Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major course work in public administration or s closely related field. A Sfaster's degree is desirable. • °/9 • May IS, 1985 ----- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA;YIO:QGA STAFF REPORT TO: City Council and City Man,~age/r FROM: Robert A. Rizzo {.(.1.1 Assistant to City Manage// L~CAhION r, 2`O ~~yl - r x _ ~, z ~~;- ~ SUBJECT: Approval to Authorize Funding of Building Improvements in the amount of $10,500.00 for Office Space Located ai 9360 Base Line Road, Unit "C," to be utilized by Public Works Inspection Staff As parr of the current fiscal year budget, the City Council authorized the acquisition of additional office space at 9360 Base Line, Unit C. This ores will be utilized by the public works inspection staff. The proposed modifications to this work spoce are of a minimal nature; the basics of a "T-bar" ceiling, heating and air conditioning unit, utility carpet on concrete, and an "open space" approach with no walls separating work areas. This office space will accommodate }he current staffing level and any potential needs in the foreseeoble future. Two construction bids were received as follows: Young Contractors $10,500.00 L. K. Porter $11,945.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize funding of building improvements in }he amount of $10,500.00 0} 9360 Base Line, Unit C, and direct the City Manager to sign a contract with Young Contractors }o start construction on the city office modifications. RAR:mk y9 May 15,1985 -- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 70: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant to City Manager SUBJECT: Approval to Authorize an Equity Adjustment in the Plan Checker Salary Range iicn.tiro'~ ~~l~9 x~~`~- x ~. z _> -}u-% I As the City Council may be swore, we have been experiencing some problems in our plan checking process. One of the key factors in this situation is that our staffing has been one person short since fJovember, 1984, Two recruitments hove been held to fill this vacant position, with no success in attracting qualified personnel. The salary range for this position was reduced as a result of the classification study in October, 1984. The salary data provided at that time only surveyed the local labor market. In taking a second look at the City~s needs to fill this position with well qualified personnel, if is perceived 6o}h the local and regional markets need to be surveyed. When local and regional labor markets were surveyed if was found the current range was 9.1 % below the median. Below is a summary of the survey data, Local Labor Market Median $2,212 salary (mo) Regional Labor Market Median 2,716 salary (mo) Combined Local and Regional Labor Market Median 2,494 salary (mo) Percentage below Median 9.1% Step Salary (mo) Current Plan Checker Control Point 337 2,270 Adjusted Plan Checker Control Point 396 2,496 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council to authorize an equity adjustment for the plan checker salary range from current control point step 337, $2,270 to adjusted control point step 396, $2,496, RAR:mk 5~ CITY OF RANCHO CCCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT °, \J DATE: May 15, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 8Y: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE NUNT CLUB ANNEXATION Based on the Council's direction, the case of Rancho Cucamonga versus LAFC and the City of Fontana has been settled out of court. As a condition of the settlement, the City entered iota two separate agreements with the property owners of the Hunt Club and with Caryn Company, owner of the land west of the new sphere of influence boundary. The specific conditions in the agreements were previously reviewed 6y the City Council. However, at Lhis point, formal ratification of these approved agreements is required by the City Council. The conditions of the settlement leave the City in a relatively advantageous position. The agreements entered into with LAFCO, Fontana, Hunt Club property owners, and the Caryn Company provide the City with an assurance that the City's boundaries and sphere of influence will be respected in the future and that an Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan will he prepared for the Hunt Club property. Development of the Hunt Club will be limited to four dwellings per gross acre on the average, and the City will have the opportunity to formally comment on the development of the specific plan throughout the planning process. As an added bonus, a detailed planning program fn the form of a specific plan will be initiated on our side of the sphere of influence boundary by Mr. Diiorio of the Caryn Company, with the ultimate goal of annexing that land to the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga. The City will be very closely involved in that process also, both as a viewer and a participant. Sy CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Hunt Club Annexation May 15, 1985 Page 82 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the two agreements with the Hunt ub~- and the Caryn Canpany be ratified. An affirmative Vote of the Council i5 all that is required. • ~J • sa CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONC;A MEMORANDUM May 7, 1985 T0: Lity Manager and City Council ~ ~? FkOM: Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst' "- "- SUBJECT: Ose of City Loan ciCa.t~p ¢jJ "~ ~= i/ =~ n G z L z a In response to a request from the Trails End Boy Scouts for the use of the City logo for purposes of advertising its annual Boy Scout Jamboree, the City Attorney has prepared the attached statement which holds the City harmless of damages related to the use of the logo. The attached statement also gives the Trails End Division permission to use the logo for that activity. • It is appropriate to have the Council approve the authorization for the Mayor to sign the statement since this issue relates to the use of the official City logo. RECOMMENDATIOPI Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached statement holding the City harmless of damages relating to the use of the City loop for the annual Boy Scout Jamboree. /ml S3 ~U.\Ip ~'~~~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA \ • -Y~~ yi_ M,M JOO D. Nltllf T ,CIA fewYrwMn .- Z _> l'huks J. Buquet 11 Jeffres Rine 19J; Rkiurd fl. Dlhl Pamek J.IhieM Trails Eod Diecr ic[ Hoy Scouts 120 West Sao Joae Street Claremo¢[, California 91711 Attention: Terzy Cutler, Ezecut ive Director Joe Yelasquez, Camping Chairman Re: Ose of City of Rancho Cucuonga Logo in Advertising Boy Scout Jamboree Gentlemen: The puspoae of this letter is to give you written permiuion Co uae [he logo of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for purposes of advert icing your annual Boy Scout Jamboree rhicb i^ to occur this September on Che terms a[^tad belw i¢ thin letter. The City is sore than happy to allw the boy Stouts to uae the logo for i[a positive purposes. Bovever, a you ay know, almost every time a city is in any way connected in the public mind with an event, [he city does place itself in a position of third parties bringing suit in the event of injuries. to accordance with the above atatemente and in consideration of the Ci[y of • Rancho Cucamonga allw ing gour use of [he logo for the specific purposes set f ozth above, Trails Eod Dis trio Boy Scouts hereby agrees to indnnify the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ib elected of EiciaL , officers, agents and espl ogees, end ee c6 of them, and to bold thee, and esc6 of them, harmless from anq and all claims, actions, causes of action, damages and/or demands, and any court coats and art orney e' fees related thereto, in any way sr ie ing out of or connected v ith Che uae of the logo permitted hereby and/or any ocher event and activi- ties which occur a[ the above-referenced Boy Scout Jamboree to the maximum ez- ten[ permitted by law. Again, ve are moat pleued [o grant you permission to uae the Ci cy"a logo in accordance with Che pr wisions of this letter. Would you please date end exe- cute the copy of this letter where i¢dicated below, thereby agreeing to [he terms of the uae of the logo, and then return that copy of letter co ua in the self-addressed envelope prw ided Eor your cowenience, [hereby entering into [he tranuct ion referenced above. Sincerely, Joo D. Mikel s, Mayor DATBD TBAILB &7D BOY SCODTB BY: fJfO BASELINB GOAD. 9UPfg C • POST OFFICE BOX BOPS yAMCHO CUCA.NONGA, CALIFORNIA O17S0 ! (71119BS•IBSI n:mv nn n ~ w•n i,n nrrn , w-,nvn w • STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer technician ,~` ~...~VYn 2`~ ~^. z , ~, ;> ;;i `_ ~ > 1917 ~ SUBJECT: Intent to annex Tract Nos. 12365, 12590-1 thru 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Conmunity) as Annexation No. 1 Tract No. 12365, located on the southeast corner of Spruce and Terra Vista, received final City Council approval on November 7, 1984, and Tract No. 12590-1 thru 6, located on the north side of Baseline, east of Naven, received final City Council approval on February 6, 1985. gttached for City Council approval, is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 12365 and Tract Nos. 12590-i thru 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and setting the public hearing for June 5, 1985. Also, attached for preliminary approval is the Engineer's Report for this annexation. RECgMENDATION It is recommended that City Councii adapt the attached reso tution approving the Engineer's Report and setting the date of public hearing for June 5, 1985. Respectfully s mitted, /r ! i " LBH:LH~ o (' 0.ttathments 5>' CITV OF RANCHO CUCA~~'MIGA Engineer's Report for ANNE"dATi041 N0. 1 to LAPiDSCAPE MAI PITENANCE DISTRICT h10. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community Tract 12365, Tracts 12590-1, -2, -3, -4, -s, -6, park, and street plantings SECTION 1. Au therfty far Reoo rt This report is prepared in compliar ce with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division l5 of the Streets znd Highways Code, State pf California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 198?}, SECTION 2. General Description Landscape Maintenance District Nn. a (the "District"1 maintains stree! plantings, parks, trails, and similar areas throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. A11 residential developments in Terra Vista xre +.n be annexed to the District pursuant to Ordinance No. I90; areas to be maintained which tie - outside residential developments are aisp tp be anne red far maintenance purposes. This Annexation t•!o. t anne r,es to the District the following areas: • Tract flo. 12365 (2'0 multifamily dwellings) • Tract Mos. 12590-1, 12590.2, 12590-3, 12590-a, i?590-6, and i2S90-6 (total lE0 Single family dwellings) • Northwest neighborhood park (lot ;, Parcel t4aD Nn. BBa 21 and trait • Gateway planting at southeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenu? • Median planting in Base Line Road from Haven Avenue to a point 2,017 feet west of future Milliken Avenue • Median planting it Haven Avenue from Base line °.nad to Church Street All landscaped aromas to be maintained in the annexed teat*s are shown nn the tract maps (or by 5e pa ra to instrumen t7 a5 roa dwav righ t-of -wav, dedica- tions, or easzments to be granted to the Cir,v of Rancho Cucamnn qa. SECt*,ON 3, Plans and Specifications The Dlans and specifications for the landscaping within residential tracts have been prepared by Lhe dove toper and have been aoprnved as part of the improvement plans for those tracts. The plans and specifications are in rmNurme nco wlLii Lhe "r ia~m iuy Cunnnine iun condi~ions of approval. Plans and specifications for landscaped areas outside residential tracts have been separately prepa rod by the developer, sL Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landsca oed areas. The plans and • specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4, Estimated Casts No costs will be incurred for construction. All improvements wilt be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis, and developed work standzrds, it is estimated that maintenance costs `,or assess- ment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments wilt be eased on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation Mo. 1 is as follows: P kwys R Trails ft Street Parks Gateways Greenwys Med iansa Trees Tract 12365 -- 12,250 Incl. 2,720 74 trees sq. ft. sq. ft. Tracts 12590-1, -2, -- 31,575 4,180 4,450 365 trees -3, -4, -5, -6 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Local park 5 acres Incl. 9,935 -- 33 trees (Lot 1, PM 8E42) sq. ft. and trail • Base Line Rd. median -- -- -- 16,800 95 trees sq. ft. Haven Ave. median -- -- -- 13,975 90 trees sq. ft. Gateway a? Haven -- 10,000 -- -- -- and Dase Line sq. ft. Total areas 5 acres 51825 X15 3945 657 trees Unit cost (annual) $5,000/ 35¢ per 35t per 15t per $5 per acre sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. tree Totals 406 $18'838.75 $4.25 $5~. 75 $3285.00 TOTAL ANNUAL COST $3 5 .75 aMedians in perimeter maior arterials ad,ioining property owned by others • aro 5hnwn at half arteal area, b Pa rk main?enance cost is al re adv included in the estimated costs of the District as initially formed. S7 The est mated to *.al annual mainten a^ce cost, and estimated annual assess- menu , for the District after Pnnexation "JO. 1 are as follows: After initial 4dded by _ formation of Annexation New total District No. l for District Total estimated annual maintenan to cost 5 69,400 532,755.75 5102.155.75 Assessment units: 1 per single family dwelling unit 245 180 425 0.5 per multifamily dwelling unit 75 135 211 Assessment rate: Total cost asst, units = assessment per asst un it 521(.20 3160.62 Assessment Shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Dixg ram. SECTION 5. Asses scent Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report. By this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this • report. SECTION 6. Asses<_ment Maintenance casts for the entire District are found to be of specific henefit to z11 develrped residential property within the District in accor- dance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units Sin'a 1e family residential dwelling 1 unit Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council will hold a public hearing in June 1985, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1984/85 fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resoluti en instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adapts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of intention to Annex to District and sett public hearing dates. 4. Litt' Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and deter- mines to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. C~ [YeMf ~ ,,, Mays ihu fill, Ln ni neon f11,nc a ,~^e.r ;~ifh rho D: by DOUnCII.~' 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a puhlic hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. rP RESOLUTION N0. 405=TY09R 8S'~~1d- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO . CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) WHEREAS, on May 15, 1985, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly Considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized casts and • expenses ohs aid~work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report 6e, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descri a in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said gssessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saw Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4; That said report shall Stand as the City Engineer's Report for- tee purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 1985, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: C~ s5 RESOLUTION N0. ~'-*5"R41!" 85 -~49 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENT [ON TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY), AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCRPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLRCE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience require an it is t e intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways, median • islands, gateway planting and parks. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to he located wi in roadway r g t-o -way, landscaping easements and City Parks of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No, 1 to Landscape Maintenance OiStr ict No. 4". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplate word-,-in the opim on oP said~'~~ounciTis o~ more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 1 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said houndary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file fn the office of the City Clerk of said City. L/ SECTION 4. Report of Eng sneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, • assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in Che same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments far the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6, Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on June 5~t the our o in tie .,ty Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons hav i'ng any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed fn accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by • written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1912: All the work herein propos~s~iall a one and came t roug in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma~suant Co ection o the overnment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 30 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, a i ornia, and circu sated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • Gd. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 TRACT NO. 12365 & LOT 1 OF P.M. 8842 & ADJOINING TRAIL /'////////. GROUND AND TREE MAINTENANCE v EJ ~..r~ r/~ OT 1 OF P.M. 8842 ~~ Q ,;; s G7° ~ ~ ~~Q TRACT 12365 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ a ~~~ ~ a r~ a ~ ~ ~ d~~ ¢~.It as ~a~ o V ~~~ MOUNTAIN tis diagram is for maintenance district_essessment Information pc,po titlr.; ,tp.^- Vic, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~.•-~~~•~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T €u ~ w !> l~l un LLOYD M1895, CITY ENGINEER RCE 23899 OnTE Page ~Y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE iMA1NTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 TRACTS 12590-1 THROUGH 12590-6 -----~~ Ground and Tree Maintenance Tree Maintenance Only This diagram is for maintenance district assessment Information only. ~` "" ~~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r, ` ~.S COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ~-=~,.r.v.~ . ~.' - i`i BTATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ ~1> HTI 1 i nvn YIRRG CITY FAIAWFFR RCF 23AP9 BATC ~T lr page GS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 MEDIANS AND GATEWAY PLANTING IN BASE LINE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE /////////. GROUND AND TREE MAINTENANCE i i i i i i i i i W ~ . S W i W S~ diagram_Is for maintenance district assessment In ,~`` " M, ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~6-~~`4 ~~j„*1TV ()F IRAN AFAN A~iT~A ' ,~ BTATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T ~'~' I1/1VR NrOOf PrTV C~rMUCGe nnv n~eee lv title; on G` BASE LINE ROAD .~..... • • CITY OF RAtiCHO CliCA:ifONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Technician c~ .~?~ , ~; , °. >_ z ~~~ ., .. ~ !> SUBJECT: Intent to annex Tract Nos. 12365, 12590-1 thru 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) as Annexation No. 1 Tract No. 12365, located on the southeast corner cf Spruce and Terra Vista, received final City Council approval on November 7, 1984, and Tract Nos. 12590-1 thru 6, located on the north side of Baseline, east of Haven, received final City Council approval on February 6, 1985. Attached for City Council approval fs a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 12365 and Tract Nos. 12590-1 thru 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and setting the public hearing for June 5, 1985. Also attached for preliminary approval is the Engineer's Report for this annexation. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Engineer's Report and setting the date of the public hearing for June 5, 1985, rRe@~c~tf~ul ly sub it ed ~ Atta ments i.7 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNE%ATION N0. 1 to STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community tract 12365, Tracts 12590-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, pa rk,~and street right-of-way SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the S[reets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1982). SECTiCN 2. Ger eral Description Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") provides for npe ration, servicing, and maintenance of street lights on local and collector streets and secondary arterials (except Church Street) in the Terra Vista Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be annexed to the District pursuant to Ordinance No. 190; areas to be maintained • which lie outside residential developments are also to be annexed for mainte- nance purposes, This Annexation No. 1 annexes to the District the following areas: • Tract No. 12365 (270 multifamily dwellingsl • Tract Nos. 12590-1, 12$90-2, 12590-3, 12590-4, 12590-5, and 12590-6 (total 180 single family Cwellings) • Northwest neighborhood park (Lot 1, Parcel Map No. 8842) and trail • Terra Vista Parkway right-of-way (south half) from Spruce Avenue to Church Street SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and specifications are as stfpulated in the con- ditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps or development plans and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvements are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto, G8 SECTI OPI 4, Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting constru ctinn. All improve- • menu will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance. costs for assessment pu rpnses will be as set forth helow. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments will he based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 1 is as follows hosed on high pressure sodium vapor 1dmDi: 5800 Lumen 9500 Lumen Street Lights Street Lights Tract 12365 and T.V. Pkwy. S 17 Tracts 12590-I, -2, -3, '4. -5, -6 50 5 Local park (lot 1, PM 8847) and adjoining trail 0 2 Total lights 55 pq SCE monthly rate, x 38.75 x gg,g0 maint. and energy Months per year x 12 x 12 • Totals 4~7?5 S?,851 TOTAL ANNl1AL COST 48,626 the estimated total annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assess- ments, for the District after Annexation Nn. 1 are as follows: After initial Added by formation of Annexation New total District No. 1 for District Total estimated annual maintenance cost S 7,875 g 8,626 416,501 Assessment units: 1 per single family dwelling unit 245 l80 425 0,5 per multifamily dwelling unit 76 135 211 ~ 313 333' Assessment rate: Total cost r asst. units • = assessment per asst uni t 5 24.53 S 25.94 Gq Assessmen*. shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in . Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and by this reference is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accor- dance wi?h the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units tnS' gle~'amily residential dwelling 1 unit Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council will hold a public hearing in June 1985, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incd rred by the City during the 1984/85 fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. c. way wmivi wuy~> ncw~a~wu v~ r~c~nuino~y ryy~v.u~ v. .. .~ .y ..... ~. . • Report. 3. City Council adapts Resolution of intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing dates. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all res r,i mony and deter- mines to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r 1 70 RESOLUTION N0. EB5=i5=89R g s ~ 7yy • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) WHEREAS, on May 15, 1985 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said pct, which report has keen presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses off' said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the P.:sessment District referred to and descrihed in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3; That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in s~ s~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to he received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for a purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: `~ / RESOLUTION N0. s~-°~gR 8S-/yS • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING [TS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1912 AND OFFERING A TIME ANO PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and-it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to hr. ,. • " "'' withsri roadway rign[-or-way-or-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and mare particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", SECTION 3. Descri lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in the opinion o sae ,ty ounce is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4" maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4, Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. '~3 SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are • collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on June 5~9S5-at t e our o pm in t e City Council Chamhers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho~Cucamonga, any and all persons having any ohject ions to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 1. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein proposed shall be one and carr ie through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and t inhtina pct of 1972. beina_ Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. • SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to ect ion o t e overnment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re art, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntar o, a i ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ACOPTED this 15th day of May, 1985. RYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor • ~y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 TRACT NO. 12365 & LOT 1 OF P. M. 8842 & ADJOINING TRAIL P pRKw pV ERRp VtSTp ~ C~~ ~} ~ LOT 1 OF P.M. 8842 ~~~ o ~ TRACT 12365 ~~ c~ ~~ ~ V o O ao ~ a ~~ D: a ~ t j ~~ ~vE H LLL...JJJ ~LJ I n I ~._ MOUNTAIfJ~ ~ V\E`t'I m is for maintenance district assessment i 7G ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHT RAAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 TRACTS 12590-1 THROUGH 12590-6 ~A[[ l!1[ BOA[ am is for maintenance ~,~ ""°:,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `"~P' ~~~, J ~~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO n i STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ page ~,~ ~ ~ nm `[TARS. CITY ENGINEER R.GE23999 GATE ~ _ 77 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 SOUTH SIDE TERRA VISTA PARK WAY PORTION LJ ~1 0115E LINE 12310 12319 ~ L 12317 2 W 11-1\ i z I / i 1z31a IIOAD 12361 STREET LIGHT MAINTAINENCE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY This diagram is for maintenance district assessment informati ~~ ~~~ title; ,~,,j-s;~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ _ da ~ ~~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ~ '' - i=: is STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ L~' ~ ~ (]YO MIIRFS riTV rga~n~r ro orr ~~oao nntc ~ D~g~ 78 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A 1985-86 Engineer's Report for landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2 4 and 5 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the actual cos t5 for Fiscal Year 1984-85 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1985-86 of the following maintenance districts for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Arnac rn he included in the work program are specifically defined in the • body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said Maintenance Districts are as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. I 564,503 sq. ft., General City Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Victoria Planned Comnun ity Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Terra Vista Planned Comnun icy Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Tr. 11915-1, Tot Lot & Open Sapce Work to be provided far, with the assessments established by the District: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of parkway improvements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as 1/2 a lot. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Parkway improvements were constructed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map of development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the parkway areas. The plans and specifications for landscape improvement on the individual development are hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. -1- q9 Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement • of all or any part of any improvement, providing far the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for parkway initial land scab ing improvement construction. All initial improvemn is will be constructed by developers. Based on historic data, estimated maintenance costs for fiscal year 1985- 86 are as follows: A. Landsca Maintenance District No. 1 - Est mate Assessment Costs E. 11 x 377,071 sq. ft. = 564,103.09 1984-85 Actual Cost Summary Utilities 58,638.00 • City Labor & Admin. 239.45 Contract Maint. 22,966.86 Weed Control 263.19 Actual assessment received (548,549.88) less Actual Cost (532,108.10) _ E 16,441.78 far restoration. 1985-86 Estimated Assessment Cost 5.17 X 564,503 sq. ft. 595,965.51 Total Assessable Lots 1985-86 = 1541 Single Family 2233 Multi-Family Assessments: Single Family - 538.00 X 1541 58,558 Multi-Family - 519.00 X 2233 =14 With this report the previous spread method is being amended. Only those tracts which have begun building are being assessed. The spread method is as follows: Single Family Unit = 1 Assessment Unit, Condominiums and Apartments = 1/2 Assessment Unit. Proposed Assessment for 1985-86 is 538.00 per single family unit and 519.00 per Condominium or Apartment unit. r~ L -2- f0 • B. Landscace Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Camiunity) The estimated cos tfor Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 comprising 745 units is shown below: Victoria Park Lane, 450,000 sq. ft. X 50.33/Sq. Ft. = 5135,000.00 Trails and Parkways, 84,799 sq. ft. X E0.33/Sq. Ft. = E 27,983.00 Trees, 145 X E5/Tree = E 3,725.00 Parkway Reconstruction E103~57~i 1985-86 Assessment 66,7 8 divided by 745 units = 5223.77 1851.55 vacant acres at 1/4 Assessment = 5103,575.71 C. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista) The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for fiscal year 1985-86 involves 611 dwelling units of Tracts Nos. 12316, 12316-1, 12317, 12317-1, 12364, 12364-1, 12365, 12402, 12590-1, 12590-2, 12590-3, 12590-4, 12590-5, and 12590-6 is as follows: Parks 5 acres @ 55000/acre 525,000.00 Parkways & Gateways 135,579 S.F. at 50.35/s.f. 550,838.15 • Trails & Greenway landscaping 26,935 S.F. at E0.35/s .f. E 9,840.25 Medians 65,595 S.F. at 50.15/S.F. 510,241.)5 Trees - 1257 at ES/each E EE 6 Assessment units Single family 425 d.u. x 1 unit 425 assessment units Multifamily 422 d.u. x .5 unit = 211 assessment units 34T d.u. 335 assessment units Estimated assessment rate = E 102,205.75 divided by 636 5160.70 D. Landcape Maintenance District No. 5 The estimated maintenance for 1985-86 for the 720,700 S. F. of open space and the tot lot consisting of 3,300 S.F. for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 as follows: Total Annual Miintenance of Open Space & Tot Lot E. 030 z 24,000 S. F. _ $1,200 57,200 divided by 44 units 5163.64 -3- 8/ SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagrams are attached to this report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the tent of this report. Lot dimensions are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder. TOTAL ASSESSABLE UNITS 1985-86: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 = 3,174 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 = 145 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 = 636 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 = 44 ANNEXATION SUMMARY (1984-85) landscape Maintenance District No. 1 TRACT N0. OF UNITS 12386 54 P.H. 12332-1 53 S. F. 12238 74 S.F. 12530 4 S.F. 12523 35 S. F. 11577 • 7 S. F. P.M. 7821 305 12320 60 Condos 12490 144 Condos 11606-1 44 10046 27 10041 q3 12721 270 Condos 969 31 1525 122 S. F. !2539 12540 12541 12091 248 Condos 11781 76 Condos 12712-1 20 S.F. 12621 90 T.H. 11625 102 Condos 12362 88 Condos 9539 19 S. F. 11893 35 S.F. 12801-1 33 S.F. 10035 38 S.F. 'f62'~ units .q_ • Pa • Annexation Summary (continued) Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 TRACT N0. OF UNITS 12590-1 29 12590-2 33 12590-3 23 12590-4 31 12590-5 32 12590-6 32 12365 270 X36 SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvemnts for the er~t ire districts are found to be of general benefit to all lots within each District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the appropriate District. 1985-86 ASSESSMENTS • Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 $38.00 S.F. 519.00 Condos. & Apts. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 5223.77 S. F. 5103,575.71 Vacant Land Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 5154.10 per Assmt. Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 5163.64 S. F. 83 • RESOLUTION N0. 8 J 'YY~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIR, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the casts of the improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds tha each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor anv Dart thereof, requires nr shoo ld he • modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily apprvoed and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to an described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land withn said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1965-86 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. Sy RESOLUTION N0. S s;' IH 7 R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMEppTMy WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE v DISTRICT N0. 1, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 PURSUANT TO THE LANOSCAP ING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 19)2; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Div ison 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows; Description of Wark SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, landscape Maintenance District No. 4, and Landcape Maintenance District No. 5 for the fiscal year 1985-86 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenhe It and lighting purposes 6y deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of ..pc. a...... • said Districts. Said maintenance ar~d ^ 's^^ inLlnAes the cost and supervision of parkway maintenance (including sprinkler systems, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures and walls, and related facilities) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway right-of-way and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the f.i ty Engf neer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled Assessment Diagrams landscape Maintenance District No. 1", "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Assessment Oiagr ams Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", and "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District No. 5". Description of Assessment Districts SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, s o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows; QS All that certain territoy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included withi the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory inc tuded within each assessment district and which moos are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. " has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report ind icate5 the amount of the proposed assessments, the district houndar ies, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Landscape Mainte ante Districts Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 19th day of June, 1985, at t e hour of 7:30 p,m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and ali persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1985-86. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting qct of 1912, heing Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention `J SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City • Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of genral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califdrnia. _.8G ---- • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII 1985-86 Engineer's Report far Street Lighting Districts 1, 2, 3 and 4 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1984-85 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1985-86 of the following maintenance districts for various subdivision throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Street Lighting District No. 1 Street Lighting District No. 2 Street Lighting District No. 3 Street Lighting District No. 4 . Areas to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said Street Lighting Districts are as follows: Street Lighting District No. 1 197 Arterial Lights Street Lighting District No. 2 252 Local Lights Street Lighting District No. 3 Victoria, 333 Lights Street Lighting District No. 4 Terra Vista, 152 Lights Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of street light f mprovements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Street lighting was constructed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Cfty Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan ad the assessment diagram for the exact location f the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. B7 Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement • of all or any part of any improvement providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historic data, estimated maintenance costs for fiscal year 1985-86 are as follows: q. Street Lighting District No. 1 S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* uantity Rate** 95 L 02 .9 5800E 95 8.82 *H igh Pressure Sodium Vapor *• SCE Schedule LS-1. All night service per lamp per month, effective 1-1-84 • La~mps_ Rate Month Total 102 X 9.95 X 12 81280 95 % 8.82 % 12 510 054.80 2,233.6 1. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and AOministration = E1000.00 2. Cost per dwelling unit: Total Annual Estimated Costs: 5-22~-233.-60 +.~-E.1-0-00 = 58.91/year/unit No. of Units in District [oun 58.91 divided by 12 - E0.74/mo./unit • g8 • B. Street Lighting District No. 2 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: amp Size* uantity Rate** 5 0 L 2 .82 *High ressure odium Vapor **SCE Schedule LS-1. Alt night service per lamp per month, effective 1-1-84 Lamps Rate Months Total 252 X 8.82 x 12 $26,671.68 2. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and Adminsitrat ion = $1,000.00 3. Costs per dwelling unit: Total A.^.nual Estimted Costs: $26 071.68 + E1 000.00 = $36.22 • No. of Units in District 76 $36.22 divided by 12 = $3.02/mo./unit C. Street Lfghting District Na. 3 (Victoria) 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate** 5800L 3 8. 2 *High Pressure odium Vapor **SGE Schedu ie LS-1. A11 night service per lamp per month. Effecive 1-1-84 L d1Ap5 Rate Months Total 333 X 8.82 X 12 535,244.72 2. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and Administration = $1,000.00 3. Costs per dwelling unit: Total Annuai Estimated Costs: 535 244.72 + E1 000 = $48.65/year/unit No. of Units in District ~T4'5-'-' $48.65 divided by 12 $4.05/mos./unit ~9 D. Street Lighting District No. 4 (Terra Vista) • The estimated cost for the District for Fiscal Year 1985-86 comprising 811 units of Tracts No.s 12316, 12316-1, 12317, 12317-1, 12364, 12364-1, 12365, 12402, 12590-1, 12590-2, 12590-3, 12590-4, 12590-5, 12590-6 is: Lamp Quantity* Rate** Month/Year 130 % 8.75 X 12 = 813,650.00 22 % 9.90 % 12 = 52,613.60 Incidental Expenses - 51000.00 Total Annual Estimated Costs: b16 263 60 + 1 000 = E27.14/yr.{unit No. of Onits in istrict 36 E27.14 divided by 12 = 82.26/mo./unit SECTION 5. A copy of the Master Assessment diagram for each district is attached to this report. Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated with the text of this report. ANNE%ATIONS Street Lighting District No. 1 • Tract 12316 Tract 12320 Tract 12316-1 Tract 12490 Tract 12317 Tract 11606-1 Tract 12317-1 Tract 10046 Tract 12364 Tract 10047 Tract 12364-1 Tract 12721 iratt 12402 Tract 9619 Tract 11934 Tract 12362 Tract 12044 Tract 12621 Tract 12045 Tract 12091 T; act 12046 Tract 11781 Tract 12530 Tract 11625 Tract 12238 Tract 12525 Tract 12332-1 Tract 12739 Tract 12386 Tract 12740 Tract 11577 Tract 12741 Tract 12523 Tract 12772-1 P.M. 7827 Tract 11893 Tract 12365 Tract 12801-1 Tract 11035 Tract 12590-1 thru 6 go • Street Lig hting District No. 2 Tract 12530 Tract 12238 Tract 12523 Tract 11577 Parcel Map 7827 Tract 12320 Tract 11606-1 Tract 10046 Tract 9619 Tract 10047 Tract 12621 Tract 12772-I Tract 12525 Tract 12739 Tract 12740 Tract 12141 Tract 11893 Tract 12801-1 Tract 10035 Street Lig hting District No. 4 Tract 12365 Tract 12590-1 thru 6 TOTAL ASSESSABLE UN[TS FOR 1985-86 Street Lighting District No. 1 2608 Street Lighting District No. 2 ~ Street Lighting District No. 3 ~- Street Lighting District No. 4 636 • SECTION 6 ASSES51£NT Improvements for the entire districts are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. [t is proposed that all future development shall be annexted to the applicable Districts. 1985-86 ASSESSMENTS Street Lighting District No. 1 Street Lighting District No. 2 Street Lighting District No. 3 Street Lighting District No. 4 S 8.91/yr 5.36.~22/, r~ 5 8~4 65/~r _ Ez7.14/yr 9/ • RESOLUTION N0. d s~ 7YB A RESOL UT[ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 1, STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 2, STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 3, AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 4 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Street Lighting District No. 1, Street Lighting District No. 2, Street Lighting District No. 3, and Street Lighting District Na. 4 WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called far under and pursuant to said Act, which has keen presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds tha each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should he • modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses ~n connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily apprvoed and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to an described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land wi thn said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land ir, said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report far the fiscal year 1985-86 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. 92 • RESOLUTION N0. BS-7y9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTW WITH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 1, STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 2, STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 3, AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 4 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ALT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Divison 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Des criotion of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting District No. 1, Street Lighting District No. 2, Street Lighting District No. 3, and Street Lighting District No. 4 for the fiscal year 1985-86 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights and facilities thereon dedicated for lighting purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said ma. of nn,n nn nA .. -••••.••~~• ~ p2ratio.. 'reludes Cite cosi and supervision of street lighting • (incl uding~lighting and related facilities) in connection with said districts. L otat ion of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway right-o -way easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting District No. 1", "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting District No. 2", "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting District No. 3", and "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting District No. 4". Description of Assessment Districts SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: 93 All that certain territoy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included • withi the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting District No. 3", and "Man of Street Lighting pistrict No. 4", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of Said assessment districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. T inie end "r iace of Heari ng • SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 19th day of June, 1985, at the hour of 7:30 p. m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1985-86. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. L andscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Pubiication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be • published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dally Report, a newspaper of genral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. -`~= 9Y • ORDINANCE N0. °~-' ^, .~/o / AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REDESIGNATING A 31 ACRE PORT IUM OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 227-151-13 AND •14, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILL IKEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET FROM MIXED USE-OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, AND RESIDENTIAL TO HOSPITAL AND RELATED FACILITIES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a pu 6lic hearing held in the • time and manner prescribed by iaw, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this rezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: Thr following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the development district map is hereby amended accordingly. • / / // 9s • ......,....... ..... ... ........,....., ~~isb . STAFF REPORT .~' `'=r ~~;- DATE: May 15, 1985 ~' ~ p T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council i ~ !~~! FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner rur; 8Y: Gary Richards, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION OP THE SIGN OR DI N.4NCE - A request to review the definition of "sign" and its applicability to window lights. SUMMARY: The applicant has appealed the Planning Commission's interpretation of the Sign Ordinance in reference to the definition of "sign" and its applicability to window lights. The Municipal Code defines a sign as any "device, fixture, surface, or structure of any kind or character, made of any material whatsoever, displaying letters, words, texts, illustrations, symbols, forms, patterns, colors, textures, shadows, or lig hts, or any other illustrative or graphic display designated, constructed, or placed qn the ground, on a building canopy, wall, post, or structure of any kind, in a window, or any other object for the purpose of advertis in9. ident ifyinq, or calling visual attention • service, product, commodity, person, or activity, whether located on the sate, in any structure on the site, or in any other location". The Planning Coomission, at its meeting of March 13, 1985, reviewed the applicant's request to verify the definition of a "sign" and to determine or establish whether window lights should be considered as part of this overall definition. The Planning Comniss ion further reaffirmed staff's interpretation of the definition and subsequent denial of the sign application. Attached for your review and consideration is the Planning Commission staff report which fully outlines the issue of this request, and a copy of the Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 13, 1985. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the present interpretatign of the Sign Ordinance, and the findings contained within the Planning Commission staff report 6e reaffirmed. Re ectfu ubmitted, is me Cit P ner Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - March 13, 1985 Planning Commission Minutes - March 13, 1985 9b ...a .. v. ..~~., ~. ~• v~~..~., •\VA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 13, 1985 TO: Chairman and Memhers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Gary Richards, Cade Enforcement Officer tl , ~;' ~ ~, ~a-- SUBJECT: S[GN ORDINANCE INTERPRETATION - VIDEO ZONE - A request to review the def tnttton of "Sign" and its applicability Lo window lights. ABSTRACT: A request has been filed by ,lames S. Davis, Attorney at Law, representing the Video Zone, 8699 19th Street, requesting that the Planning Commission review the Sign Ordinance and its applicability to window lighting, and to direct Staff as follows: (1) does window lighting require a sign application to be submitted, and (2) whether or not the Sign Ordinance itself is overly broad in its application to window lighting :.s ible from the nuts ide. BACKGROUND: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code states that a permanent sign is defined as any "device, fixture, surface, or structure of any kind or character, made of any material whatsoever, displaying letters, words, texts, illustrations, symbols, forms, patterns, colors, textures, shadows, or lights, or any other iilustrative or graphic display designated, constructed, or placed on the ground, on a building canopy, wall, post, or structure of any kind, in a window, or on any other object for the purpose of advertising, identifying, or calli~n visu~a~l attention to anv place, structure, firm enterprise profession, Dustness, service, pro uct, tommodtty, person, or activity, whether located on the site, in any structure on the site, or in any other location" erected within the City requires an approved sign permit application prior to its erection or display. The term "placed" shall include constructing, erecting, posting, painting, printing, tacking, nailing, gluing, sticking, sculpting, carving, or otherwise fastening, affixing, or making visible in any manner whatsoever sign erected within the City requires an approved sign permit application prior to its erection or display. According to Planning Division interpretatSOn, of the above noted definition, a fixture or device with lights mounted within the window area or framing calling visual attention to any enterprise or husiness is a sign and requires the submittal and approval of a sign permit application in order to be erected or displayed within the City. 9~ ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Sign Ordinance Interpretation -Video Zone March 13, 1985 Page 2 • In September, 1984, the Video Zone, 8689 19th Street, (Phil and Brenda Goodman), were notified that the display of string lights constituted a violation of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and were requested to have the lights removed by October 15, 1984. In researching the requirements of the Code, it was determined that the use of the lights was defined by Staff as a sign, and therefore, required the submittal of a sign permit application for approval. Therefore, upon the request of the City, Sign Application 84-61 was submitted on November 13, 1984, for evaluation and approval. John Meyer, Assistant Planner, evaluated the application and denied it based on Section 14.20.100(2) which states that only one sign is permitted per building face, and since the structure already had an existing Cann ister sign on the front building face, the apDlicat ion was denied. A denial letter was sent to the Goodman's on January 15, 1985, informing them of the denial, and further giving them fourteen (14) days to remove the lights from the window area. An inspection was conducted by the City Code Enforcement Officer on January 30, 1985, to ensure compliance with the Code. The lights were still being displayed and used, therefore, a citation was issued to Mr. Goodmar for violation of the Municipal Code. The citation is currently on hold pending the interpretation by the Planning Commission. On February 4, 1985, an appeal letter was received from James S. Davis, • Attorney for the Goodman's. Since the appeal letter was not received within the ten (10) day aDPeal period, it was refused. Then on February 12, 1985, another letter was received from Mr. Davis requesting an interpretation of the Sign Ordinance relating to that section of the ordinance which defines a sign and its applicability to window lights. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the present definition of a sign include window lights, and that the denial of Sign Permit Application 84-61 be reconfirmed. • 9p ~amFS S. ilevis, Esq. ATTORNEY AT LAW 0.750 ArcfliC~IG Avenue Suite 211 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Olq 9aLTlOp Planning Co9mission February 12, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd. Suite C Rancho Chcarmnga, Ca. 91730 Subject: Video Zone, Sign Application A84-61 Gentleren: The purpose of this letter is two fold, first to register mY crnplaint against for failing to notify ~ of an adverse decision affecting mY client, Video Zone, in time to allow me to file an appeal of a sign application decision. Secondly, to request a determination by the Planning Camdssion in regards to in their opinion the lighting fixture currently i111utdnating the window at Video Zone's Rancho Q~canonga store consitutes a sign and therefore requires a application pursuant to the city ordinance. When first Mr. Richazds first contacted my client, Video Zone and it's wmer, Phil Gocdman, to advise him that in the city's opinion the lighting in • the window constituted a sign and therefore requires a application Mr Goodman contacted me and asked tre to handle the matter. I completed the sign application for Mr. Goodman and personally hand carried it to Mr. Richards, gave him the application and my card and asked him to direct any further camuications to my office as I was handling the matter. Unbeknownst to mie an adverse decision was renders] and notification was sent to the client without a copy being forwarded to m5' office. In that I had told Mr. Goodman that the city would be in torch with ne and I would handle the matter, he did not forwazd the letter to me. After the 10 day appeal period set by city had elasped, Mr. Richazds went cut to the Video Zone store and cited then Eor the alleged violation of the city ordinance and issue] a ceased and deceit order concerning the lighting. Upon being cited, Mr. Goodman contacted me to ascertain why he has berg cited when an appeal should have been filed, which was tml first notice that a denial had been issued by the city. I contacted Nr. Richazds, reminded him of the conversation first he and I had had concerning the applicaticn and asked him why he did not send me a copy. Re acknowledged the conversation, found my business card stapled to the inside of his folder and showed rte on the letter that indeed I was not a recipient thereof but stated that as faz as he was concerned he was required to send it to the applicant and not to myself. L_J ~~ 99 Page twv February 12, 1985 I explained the situation to him at which time he spoke to srneaie else who again denied to accept the appeal. Mr. Richazds, two days later, cane to my office to return the appeal and the letter from the city planner stating that bassi on city ordinance and information he had received fran the city prosecutor, they were not going to accept the appeal. I contacted the city pmsecutor, told him what happened, the city prosecutor advissi ~ that he had not been given the full story and that in his opinion the appeal should have been accepted. I was later advised by the city prosecutor that he had made that recanrendation to Mr. Richards but ta. Richards had refused to follow it. My position on this is that I had taken the time to talk to Mr. Richards in person and fully advised him of my duties in regards to this matter. This placed a burden on Mr. Richards to, if nothing else, at least advise rte of the denial so that I could enter a timely appeal. The date of the appeal running should have been the date that I received notice and not the date that Mr. Richards sent the letter to the Video Zone. • I might add that under California Statutory Iaw any notice sent by nail is autrnatieally given a five (5) day extension for service by mail. The letter [~fr. Richards serf was dated the 15th of January, adding five days that would have beer the 20th, the iUth say for the appeal would 'nave been tine 30th and yet Mr. • Richards issued the citation on the 30th wfiich was still within the ten day appeal period. I would request that my appeal to the denial of the sign application be considered timely and processed accordingly. In regards to the second natter, I have done extensive research concerning the city sign ordinance, the interpretation of the term s~ by the California courts, and the authority of the City to issue such ordinance as set forth in the California Goverment Cade. No where lave I been able to find any authority on the part of the City to govern interior lighting of a building under a sign ordinance. The word sign as define3 by West California hbrds and Phrases includes all rtanner of items such as placards, billboards and other forms of infornational printed medium. However, nowhere is the interior lighting considered to be a sign. There is authority on the part of the City to issue cease and desist orders for any lighting that either resembles an official traffic mntrol device or is so distracting to ~mtorists on a highway so as to create a traffic hazard however, that is not the situation in this case. l J 5i` y ~o O Page three • Februazy 12, 1985 Mr. Richards interpretation is that if the lighting can be seen fran the outside it constitutes a sign and therefore falls under the sign ordinance. This is obviously an untenable position on the part of Mr. Richazds in that it uw1d require a sign application to be submitted for any camercial building in the City of Rancho Cura1ronga in which the lights inside the building can be seen fran the outside. Mr. Richazds went on to advise Video Zone that because the lights were in a line and were used to attract attention they constitute9 a sign. Once again this is an untenable position in that any time lights are on in the building it is an indication that the business is open and therefore is attracting the attention of potential customers. A perfect exanple of this situation is the Bob's Big Boy Restaurant across the street fran the Video Zone's location. It has lighting both inside and outside that can be seon from the roadway and is on during the time that the business is in operation: Consequently that could fall under Mr. Richazds interpretation of the sign ordinance. It is obvious that the sign ordinance as it relates to lighting is void for vagueness, is an unconstitutional restriction on freedom of rnmercial expression and is unenforceable in that reasonable nen might differ as to its meaning and intent. It should be pointed wt that the lights are inside the window of the Video Zone, they do not flash nor do they inpart any other message, slogan, symbol or any other information to the public other than the fact. that tM ctnre ._ _~ n 33 _.ail'!-lc Ecr b:.•^inc~a. • lastly it is well established in California that a ordinance controlling crnnercial expression cannot be based strictly on asthetic principals but must have srne underlying justification such as public safety. lfierefore I am requesting that the planning caimission review the ordinance and its applicability if any to [he window lighting at the Video Zone location and prior to February 28 which is the date set for the appearance on the citation and advise me of whether or not (1) the lighting requires a sign application to be submitted in the first place and (2) whether or rat the sign ordinance itself is overly broad in this application to interior lighting visible fran the outside. Please direct your response and any further camunications to my office and feel free to call me if you have any questions. Since ely, ~ ~. / F,, an1aS S. DdVls JSD/dm ec: Gary Richazds David Carmichael Video Zone /I /O/ v~c~+ v~ .[wuiiaiU / Ciuriii~Ii®~~~ 5:x:3 ~%i,~9~(~ /'I U~~O~SriQi~Q11~ ~ II 1199 t ~ general mtormation - ?!ame of esea6lishmcne VICEO eO"'£ Daea :fov. 23, i96g Address 8689 19th Street„ Alta Lama, Ca. 91701 Appi :cane's name Phil U Drench Goe~+^en Fdd: ess 1115 Yiest Pster St: eet Upland, Ca, 9179fi Phone (lie) 9q ._11g9 O~.mcr's Nacre Phil L Erenda Goodman Address Gamo Phnne .came sign aescr(pt(on C Numher and [ pe of -ion(s): Tcmporarl~ Wall ?tanumen[ Cano pv __Su hd iv is ion `~1:'i nd rnu - _ JL'niior Sign Pr oeram _ Uirccc ianal Pedascr ian Ocher Size: Lenech llidrh Dc_ neh Overall He i~~h[ S gunce Feet 6ldq.fnce Sn.F[. Sign 1. _~ /N+ Fq ~~ - _~_ f /(A~ ~SNnP CPi:;'~ Cirn ~_ _ Sign G. - Sign 5. __ Sign 6. IE temporary or subdivision, date of rose allae ion ~ A /~A If temporary or subdivision, dale ~of expiration A /~F1 Sand amount and iden[if icac i on number .(// ~ Indi Wte sign cony, size. co lor ar.d n=_c eri als or. plans ::esc-tSed on U'~e reverse "' of ch is sheet. ~ - ~, action C -Approved /Der.icd Oy: ~. l~, l,a nos Dace: ~~-l.P-o c/ Coinme ncs: Il, ra!/JiPn~ nF ~~eci'ipn) °/7~N. ?N! wnrf. gi~,J G.iAl~i.~TL ~lE~ 00 ~z.~n~64 alY•Y GNK ~~ ~{5J)/vJ1 tfL~lJ y~ 3~:~,o,nr~ r-tu.:: S File t:n.:~ Date Rece lved: Ce cc iv ed By: 34-6/ iI - f3~y ~'~ci/K~s Fee: Receipt No: `i"~~' . .. ...... .... .. ~. /01 ~" -x. /: , . ;:;~ .- ,~.,'...,,a ~. •r. Mfr ,n IJ'.h~~f'q a_.C.:P:i S ~ijG ./ :~ io3 Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Rempel, unanimously carried, to continue • the Dubl is hearing for Variance 84-02 and Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 84-16 to the Planning Commission meeting of April 10, 1985 to allow the applicant, adjacent property owner, and staff to meet regarding the above issues. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS J. STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW Oan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker stated that if staff were given very strong polities, very strong guidelines, and very strong procedures to approve routine items, he could see where this would allow the Commission to make better use of its time on projects such as overlays and special projects. Further, that he was in favor of finding a vehicle for delegating routine, non-controversial decisions allowing an appeal process and input when requested by the public. However, there needs to be protec*.ion of due process, protection of an appeal process, and an understanding that if someone doesn't like staff's decision, it can be appealed to the Mann ing Commission. Commissioner MtN iel stated that he would like to see the process streamlined; however, was concerned with not allowing the public an opportunity to voice objections in a public forum. Chairman Stout agreed and stated that putting the burden on the public to ask • for a public hearing goes against the grain. Commissioner Rempel stated that some people may hesitate using a process which necessitates an appeal of staff's decision to the Planning Commission. He further stated that staff should not have to take the heat for decisions made. Commissioner Chitiea agreed, and stated further concern with using this process on Conditional Use Permits. Rick Gomez, City Planner, advised that with this input staff had enough direction from the Commission to fine tune this process and return to the Commission with more specific recommendations. He further advised that staff would be meeting with the new City Attorney to receive his input. x : K. SIGN ORDINANCE INTER PRETATi UN - Vi DEO ZONE Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes -1- March 13, 1985 • yoY Chairman Stout advised that he had visited the site in question and couldn't • see any other purpose for the lights other than to draw attention to the business. He further stated that the ordinance is clear and specific enough and that the lights in the window of the video zone are clearly a sign. Commissioner McNiel stated agreement that the ordinance is very clear and to allo~n these lights to remain would constitute a special privilege. Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that the of torney for the applicant argues that if this is a sign it is entitled to protection as a constitutional expression of commercial speach. He advised that commercial speach can be regulated differently than free expression of thoughts and ideas, and Lime, place, and manner can be regulated. He further advised that there is no doubt that the Sign Ordinance is constitutional and that a lighted device is a sign. Motion: Moved 6y Rempel, seconded 6y Barker, unanimously carried, to reaffirm staff's decision that the lights in the windows of the video zone are a prohibited sign and to continue enforcement. Staff was further directed to dismiss the existing citation against the applicant and to grant them ten days to comply with the Commission's decision. If compliance is not obtained within that time limit, staff was instructed to proceed with citation procedures. x . • . • L. LAND USE ANALYSIS FOR AREA AT SOUTH S[DE OF 'd ILSON BETWEEN MAYBERRY NU N N Nancy Fang, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout invited public comment. Oav id Bowden, 1441 N. Campus, Ontario, advised that he was the owner of Tract 12851, which is located within the boundaries of this analysis and is the subject of the petition before the Commission. Mr. Bowden stated that he came in at the low end of the density range to provide adequate transition and requested that the Commission retain the current land use desf gnatfon. Sandy Davis, adjacent property owner, stated concern with decreased property values as a result of the smaller lot subdivision. It was the consensus of the Commission that staff should initiate a General Plan amendment to redesignate the entire area at the south side of Wilson, between Mayberry Avenue and Haven Avenue Very-Low Residential (1-2 du/ac). Staff was further directed to expedite this request. Planning Commission Minutes -B- March i3, 1985 /OS 3ames 5. ilauis, ESq. ATfOHNEY At lAW • 8950 Arc~iEald Avenue p 101987]900 Smie 231 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91790 Rick Gomez March 21, 1985 .7i ty PZanner City of Rancho Cucamonga ?320 Baseline Road, Suite C .4anc.".o Cucamonga, Cali Fornia 9I730 Re: nppltcation of vi ieo 3one Dear Mr. Comer: This Setter is to acknowledge your notices of decision of the City Planning Commission dated March 20, 1985 and ,Ya rch 19, 1945 and received by Chis office on March Z6, 1985 and .Yardh ~10, 1985 respectively. Thank you for the dismissal of the present citation and the grant of the ten (SO) day period of compZi once. I am dissappoi nted wS th the decision of the planning commission to that the law in case authorities are clearly in fa vor~of video Zone. The City is attempting to exerctse a suppression of the free dom of commercial expression that clearly violates constitutional standards. For this reason I am appealing the matter to full City Coun oil and will be prepared at that time to cite detailed authori- ties in support of Vi dec Zone's position. Please advise me of the date of such hearing or to the alCetnati ve if there is no provision far such appeal please advise me so that I can prepare the necessary court proceedings. Please feel free to contact my office if you have any questions, Sincere ,/ ' J mes S. Davis JSD/dm cc: Gary W. Richards Video Zone • /0~ n,mv nc o w vnvn nrrn . n.rnvn . • STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Councii FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. Win finger, Assistant Planner `~~ 9 ~~ i ~>. a ~ ~ ~I. C ~: 19'- SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 85-04 - OWENS A request to amend the Development District Map from "L" (Low Density Residential) to "ISP" (Industrial Specific Plan) Industrial Park for 2.5 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-062- 01, 02. • BACKGROUND: The apPlic ant has requested a Development District Amendment for a site located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main from "L" to "ISP" Industrial Park. General Pian Amendment 85-O1-A for the applicant's parcel and the parcel directly east was approved by the City Council on March 20, 1985 (see attached staff report). A Development District Amendment is now required in order that the development district designation be consistent with the General Plan land use designation. Through Che General Plan Amendment hearing process, all land use issues have been resolved and no significant issues exist regarding the Oeve lopment District Amendment. An initial study was prepared in accordance with the environmental analysis for General Plan Amendment 85-O1-A. No significant environmental impacts have been identified. II. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the approval of Generai Plan Amendment - - the lamming Commission recommends approval of the subsequent Development District Amendment BS-04. Should the City Council concur, approval of the attached Ordinance approving the Development District Amendment would be appropriate. R ct y muted, RG:LW:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Vicinity Map Planning Commission Staff Report - April 24, 1985 Initial Study Ordinance /o ~ C • .. T_~ .. , . .'. ~ _.`,:_ .;-- _ r --: - - - : _ ~~ I '~ ~~ .: ~~:== == ~ - _ ~ , - ~ ~. ~,.a.~. C 0 a ~' //,: - enc ~ - -- ---- ,r .. ------------ j /o d CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ;i F' DATE: April 24, 1985 T0: Chairman and Memhers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. Wininger, Rss is tant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N M N - - OW - request to amend t e Deve opment District ap from °L" (Low Density Residential) to "ISP" (Industrial Specific Plan) - Industrial Park for 2.5 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-062-01, 02. BACKGROUND: The applicant has requested a Development District Amendment for a site located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main from "L" to "ISP" - Industrial Park. General Plan Amendment 85-O1-A for the applicant's parcel and the parcel directly east was approved by the City Council on March 20, 1985. State law requires that the Development District designations be consistent with the General Plan land use designation. Although a General Plan Amendment has been granted, the applicant cannot alter the existing use until the process has been completed and the Development Dfstr ict Map has also been amended. The fssues which were discussed in consideration of the General Plan Amendment are described fully in the attached staff report. However, through the General Plan Amendment hearf ng process, all land use issues have been resolved and no significant issues exist regarding the Development District Amendment request. Since the project area will be annexed into the Industrial Specific Plan area, additional development standards will be required. When the ISP update occurs later this year, this site will be considered in terms of specific development standards for a subarea of the Industrial Area. An Initial Study was prepared in accordance with the environmental analysis for General Plan Amendment 85-O1-A. No significant environmental impacts have been identified, /09 ITEM G PLANNING COMMISS IGN STAFF REPORT DDA 85-04 April 24, 1965 Page X2 II. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the approval of General Plan Amendment 85-0~ q, Staff recommends approval of the subsequent Development District Amendment 85-04 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Should the Planning Commission concur, approval of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council would be appropriate. RG:LN:cv 1 Attachment: Exhibit "A" - March 20, 1965 Initial Study Resolution of Vicinity Map Staff Report Rpproval ~~ o • • • C C • yy~~ 9 STAFF REPORT ~~~ a / ~ z,~J~~- } ~ i~; 19i' ~I DATE: February 27, 1985 T0: Chairman and Memhers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. Win finger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-01- A - RICRAROS - A request to amend the Land Use Map of the evert; al Plan from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park for 3.9 acres of land located on the east side of Archibald between Feron and 8th - APN 209-061-1, 2, 21, 22, 29; 209-062-1, 2. • ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment was requested to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to industrial Park for a 1.2 acre site at the southeast corner of Archibald and Main (see attached report). The Planning Commission directed staff to study the proposed land use change in terms of an expanded project area to include the project site and other parcels to the north and east, and determine the appropriateness of the proposed change for a larger area. At this meeting, the Commission will consider the land use change and determine if the project area is to be expanded. [I. BRCKGROUN D: At the January 26, 1985, Planning Commission meeting, a request was considered for a General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park for a 1.2 acre site located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main (see attached report}. At that time, the Commission expressed concern regarding the advisability of amending the Land Use Map of the Ger,cral Plan for a 1.2 acre area. Staff was directed to study expansion of the project area and land use compatibility of the proposed change with on and off site uses. [II. ANALYSIS: A. Project Area: The expanded project area which was examined by staff includes seven parcels located on the east side of Archibald between Feron and the AT' and SF railroad right-of-way, divided by Main Street (see Exhibit A). The area north of Main Street consists of five parcels with three single family /// ITE.'9 F Planning Commission Staff Report ` February 27, 1485 GPA 85-O1-A -Richards Page =2 • homes, a neighborhood market and vacant land. The area borders by single family homes to the east and is approximately 1.4 acres in area. The Generai Plan designates the land use as Low Density Residential, as does the Development District designation. The two parcels located south of Main which equal 2.5 acres consist of the Custom Alloys site which was originally proposed for the General Plan Amendment and a vacant parcel owned by the Santa Fe Railroad. Bordered on the east by single family homes and the south by the railroad right-of-way, the area's current General Plan and Development District designation is low Density Residential. In examining the merits of changing the General Plan Land Use Designations for these areas, it appears that the proposed Industrial Park use wau ld he inappropriate for the area north of Matn Jtreet. The • existing residential uses conform with the Low Density designation although the commercial use is non- conforming in nature. Single family development closely borders the eastern edge and the lot configuration and area (1.4 acres) would limit development of industrial park uses. The area south of Main appears to be more aDPropriate far industrial park uses. The two parcels make up a larger area (2.5 acres) than was originally proposed for the General Pian Amendment and the proposed land use change would not conflict with any on-site uses. The eastern boundary of the area is separated to some extent from existing residential uses by the undeveloped right-of-way for Reid Street and would 6e impacted somewhat less by the proposed industrial park use than by the existing forge activities. Therefore, staff recommends that the project area under analysis for the proposed General Plan Amendment include the two adjacent parcels east of Archibald and south of Main (APN 209-062-01, 02 ). Land Use Com atibilit The proposed change from Low Density Residentia to Industrial Park could impact surrounding uses through additional traffic, noise and • changes in aesthetic character of the neighborhood. // >_ Planning Commission Sl..,f Report February 27, 1985 GPA 85-O1-A -Richards Page g3 • However, the Industrial Park designation is the least intense of the industrial uses and a probable reduction in current levels of noise, emissions, and vibration could be anticipated with the elimination of the forge. Residences facing the project site on Main would experience mast of the impact, should the property develop as an Industrial Park use. It is possible that some of the noise currently experienced from the railroad right-of-way could be buffered from the neighborhood by future development of the project site. Retaining the Low Density Residential designation could expose new residential development to high levels of noise from Arch ibai~ and the railroad and would allow continuing operation of the forge as a legal nonconforming use. With the current land use designation, it is unlikely that new development will occur on-site in the near future. • IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The California Environmental puality Act requires that whenever there is evidence that a significant impact may occur, an Environmental Impact Report must be prepared. Staff feels that the requested General Plan Amendment could result in some impact in the areas of circulation, aesthetics, health, safety and nuisance as discussed in the Initial Study attached to the previous staff report. However, none of the impacts discussed above would be considered a significant adverse impact which could not be mitigated through the design review process when a proposed project is submitted. Therefore, staff feels that no further environmental analysis at the General Plan level is merited. Further environmental review at the project level should include a full discussion of impacts and mitigation measures proposed in the areas of circulation, aesthetics, health, safety and nuisance. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the General Plan Amendment, decide that the change from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park would promote the land use goals and policies of the General Plan and that this Amendment would not be materially detrimental to the adjacent properties or would not cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following are the findings that are necessary on approval. // 3 Planning Commission S~,f Report l February 27, 1985 GPA 85-O1-A - Richards Page k4 n LJ A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the land use element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the boundary of the proposed project. To date, no correspondence has been received. VII. RECOMMENDATION: Should the Planning Commission determine that the Facts far Finding of approval indicate that the land use ch anae is appropriate on the 2 parcels adjacent to the railroad, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would be required. In addition, the applicant will be required to file a Development District Amendment to change the DD designation from "L" to Industrial Specific Plan - Industrial Park. Should the • Commi ss ian wish to deny the Amendment, a Resolution of Denial is also attached. Re3~ectfullys ubmitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:LW:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Project Area Map January 26, 1985 Staff Report Initial Study Resolution of Approval Resolution of Genial • ~~y t t • _ .,- -.-.-...-.., ~ ................ ~~..,..,~o STAFF REPORT ~y~9, ` ~ ~'f 1971 ~~ DATE: January 26, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. Wininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT BS-O1- A - RI CHARDS - A request to amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park far 1.2 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-061-01. • I. ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment is requested to change the lam use designation from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park for a 1.2 acre site located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main. The applicant wishes to cease the current nonconforming use as a forge and sell the structure for use by an electrical contractor as office, warehousing and storage facility. The Commission will determine if the proposed change is appropriate in terms of scope and land use compatibility. II. BACKGROUND: The applicant wishes to develop a light industrial user on a T2 acre site located on Rrchibald Avenue near the North Town area. The existing fndustrial activity wiil be discontinued to allow the proposed office, retail and storage use by an electrical contractor. The current General Plan and Development Oistri ct designations of Low Density Residential do not permit the proposed use. The existing use, a foundry, is currently nonconforming in nature. Consequently, a General Plan Amendment is requested to change the current Low Density Residential designation (2-4 du/acre) tc Industrial Park. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate the proposed General Plan Amendment and any possible alternative land uses for the project site. III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Amend the Generai Plan Land Use Map from Low Oensi ty Residential (Z-4 du/acre) to Industrial Park. //.i PLANNING COMMISSION Slt F REPORT ` GPA 95-O1-A - Richards January 26, 1995 Page k2 B. Location: East of Archibald Avenue, south of Main Street. • C. Parcel Size: 1.2 acres D. Exist in Develo ment District Desi nation: Low Density Residentia E. Existing Land Use: Metal Forge F. Surrounding land Use and Development District Designations: North - Commercial and Residential (Low Density Residential) South - AT & SF Railroad right-of-way and Residential (Industrial Specific Plan) East - Vacant and Residential (Low Density Residential) West - Conercial and Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan) G. Surroundinq General Plan Designations: North - Law Density Residential South - General Industrial East - Low Density Residential West - General Industrial H. Site Characteristics: The project site is bounded on the • south by the railroad right-of-way and on the east by vacant parcels. A 9,000 square foot metal building located on the southern portion of the site houses the existing industrial use. Other site features consist of a small outbuilding, paved parking areas, several eucalyptus trees, and other shrubs. IV. ANALYSIS: A. History: When the General Plan was adopted, the North Town area, roughly bounded by Archibald, 26th, Marine, and 8th Streets, was Considered to be distinctly single family residential in nature and received a General Plan designation of Law Density Residential. The Custqm Alloys forge and the netghborhood market at the corner of Archibald and Main thus became Nonconforming uses. 8. Reason for Request: The project applicant wishes to cease operations as a forge and sell the structure for use as warehouse and storage space with limited office and sales activity. Since the proposed use differs significantly from the current nonconfgrming use, the General Plan Amendment has been requested to permit the proposed use. • // G PLANNING COMMISSION Slt r REPORT ~ GPA 85-O1-A - Richards January 26, 1985 Page e3 • C. General Plan Land Use Goals and Polic ies• The existing land use designation of the project site and the surrounding neighborhood is low Density Residential. The General Plan describes the Low Density Residential designation as "characterized by single family homes...appropriate where the tr aditianal character of detached single family units prevail and where the level of services including roads, shopping and recreation are not sufficient to justify a higher density." In comparison, the Industrial Park designation requested by the applicant is defined in the General Plan as "grouped concentrations of industrial and research and development offices, organized along major thoroughfares on the periphery of the Industrial Area". The General Plan states that opportunities should be encouraged to mix different but compatible land uses and activities in the City, and that land uses must be organized to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent uses. In addition, it fs implied in the Oevelopment Code and the General Plan that nonconforming uses shall gradually be eliminated where possible and replaced with uses that are consistent with the existing General Plan designation. • D. Issues for Consideration: Two major issues arise in consideration of this pro ect. The first issue is that of compatibility of the proposed land use with the existing surrounding land uses. The current industrial use, while separated to some extent from most of the residential use in the area, is clearly incompatible with the single family homes in the area. The operation of a forge with attendent noise, emissions, vibration, traffic, and aesthetic impacts is inappropriate in close proximity to homes. This use has been allowed to continue as a nonconforming use only because it was in operation prior to the establishment of the Low Density residential designation. The proposed industrial park, while a less intensive industrial use than the forge, would pose some of the same problems in terms of traffic, noise, and aesthetic quality. Since the existing structure would remain, albeit in a different function, no significant improvement would occur in screening or site design. In addition, the parcel size of 1.2 acres is too small to allow development of additional industrial park uses, thereby limiting the scope of additional development. The second major issue is that of the size of parcels for which General Plan Amendments may be considered. While the /i'7 PLANNING COMMISSION ST'NdF REPORT ~ GPA 85-O1-A - Richards January 26, 1985 Page d4 • City has no formal minimum lot size for General Plan Amendment consideration, past City policy dictates that areas to be amended be defined by logical physical or other boundaries, and that all properties in the immediate area which have similar characteristics be given similar consideration. Allowing amendments for parcels which do not meet these criteria would lead to a "spot zoning" situation, where small pieces of land scattered throughout the City bear land use designations which create inconsistent patchwork patterns of land use. Based on the above factors, staff feels that the General Plan Amendment as proposed is not appropriate far the project site. However, the site's proximity to the railroad right-of-way and associated nuisances, to Archibald Avenue, and overall trends of development in the North Town area, suggest that the Low Density Residential development may not be the optimal ultimate land use for the site either. This report will discuss alternatives for land use of the project site which consider land use compatibility and site constraints. ALTERNATIVES: In considering alternative land uses for the project site, it is apparent that the small size of the site • limits the scope of any use. In order to discuss alternative uses, it is necessary to maximize the area under consideration to determine ff the site may be linked to adjacent properties to form a larger, more logical project boundary. Exhibit "B" shows the area fronting on Archibald between Feron and the railroad right-of-way which is either vacant or sparsely developed. This area differs significantly from the single famfly character of the North Town neighborhood and forms a logical area of consideration for changes in land use. Two basic land use alternatives have been considered for the expanded project area under discussion. Industrial Park: The site's proximity to the railroad right-of-way and the Industrial Area as well as its location along a major thoroughfare appear consl5tent with the typical Industrial Park use. However, incompatibility with surrounding residential uses would again be a problem. Even with an expanded project area, the scale of the project would create a very small Industrial Park. [n addition, the parcels are owned by a variety of persons and gaining ownership of a sufficient number of parcels for an integrated development would be difficult if not impossible. • // / r PLANNING COMMISSION Sll..f REPORT GPA 85-O1-A -Richards January 26, 1985 Page AS • 2. Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/act Like the Discovery fiownhomes project just north of the project area, a medium density residential project would maintain the predominantly residential nature of the area while creating a buffer from Archibald Avenue and the railroad right-of-way. This land use would be more compatible with existing residential uses than the current or proposed land uses. However, proximity to the railroad right-of-way could expose residents to railroad and automobile noise which would require mitigation through site design and barriers. Also, problems exist in terms of project scope and parcel ownership. Site design incorporating existing circulation would also be difficult. Since the Medium Density Residential designation allows a range of 4-14 dwelling units per acre, the Development District designation could fall into the Low-Medium (4-8 du/acre) or Medium (8-14 du/acre) categories. Depending on the numher of owners wishing to join together in developing their properties, the Commission could determine at a later date if the project scope justified aLow-Medium or Medium designation. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The California Environmental puality • Act requires that whenever there is evidence that a significant impact may occur, an Environmental Impact Report must be prepared. Staff feels that the requestetl General Plan Amendment as proposed could result in some impacts in the categories of socio-economic factors, land use and planning considerations, circulation, health, safety and nuisance factors, and aesthetics. Part I[ of the attached Initial Study discusses each of these impacts in detail. On the basis of these potential impacts, it is suggested additional environment ai analysis would he necessary prior to approval of the amendment as proposed. VII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the General Pl ari Amendment, decide that the change from Low Density Residential would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan, and that this Amendment would not he materially detrimental to the adjacent properties or would not cause significant adverse impacts 's listed under the Environmental Assessment, the fallowing are the findings that are necessary nn approval: /i 9 PLANNING COMMISSION Sll...r REPORT GPA 85-O1-A - Richards January 26, 1985 Page p,6 A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies • of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the land use element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the boundary of the proposed project. To date, no correspondence has been received. [X. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis of the Land Use Policies o the General Plan, staff recommends denial of the General Plan Amendment as submitted. Should the Commission wish to consider the alterr etive land uses discussed, direction should be given regarding the nature of further study of land uses in the project area. The Commission has several alternatives for action: 1. To approve the General Plan Amendment per the attached Resolution of Approval. This alternative is not recommended. 2. To deny the General Plan Amendment per the attached Resolution of Denial with no further study. This would • confirm the current Low Density Residential designation. 3. With applicant's consent, to continue the amendment, and to provide Staff with specific direction as to the scope and type of land use to be analyzed and brought back for Comm ssion action. (Should the applicant decline to consent to the changes in the scope of the amendment, it would be appropriate [o deny this request and to initiate a new amendment for review during the next General Plan Amendment cycle.) tful lYsubmi tted, City Planner RG:LW:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan and Development District Map Exhibit "B" - Expanded Project Area Map Initial Study Resolution of Denial • Resolution of Approval /.t o • CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONCA PART II - INITIAL STUDY Eh'VIRON1ffNTA1 CHECKLIST DATE: /'y(J/~~~ /%j ~ /~)S APPLICA.~T: .,/U/lppl7 Q(,(~QnS n ~j' FLLINC DATE: ~.3,(/`a LO,}G NL?19ER: ~/h/~G J~' /AJQ-`Q9 PROJECT: LU.~~7/Y(oyZ [//"11,//AiE ~I~IL/E' ~ (/d,,l-D ~' PROJECT LOCATIO\: ._y/u~hedj,t. ~'~rj~Qj~ QT ~/(~'/ /,Ea~l(,t. ~-md//~ I. ENt'IROV~N?AL I!7pACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO • 1. Soils and Ceo to ev. Will the proposal have signii scone resoles in: a, L'ns tab le ground cond scions or in changes in geologic relac SOnships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of [he soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? f e. My potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site condi[ons? / f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g, Exposure of people or proper cy [o geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or siml lar hazards? h. M increase Sn [he rate of extrac[Son and/or / use of any mineral resource? / 2. Hydro logy. Will [he proposal have signif !cant resin ee in: _ /.t~ Page 2 YES `!41'BE \C a. Changes Sn currents, or [he course of direc [Son • of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in ab sorption rates, drainage patterns, oz the race and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations [o the course or flow of flood eaters? / / d. Change Sn the amount of surface water in any body of eater? e. Discharge in co surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f f. Alteration of grovndwa ter characteristics? g. Change !n the quantity of grovndwa cers, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quant l[y? h. The reduction Sn [he amount of water ocher- ? / / • wise available for public water supplies _ i. Exposure of people or property to water / related hazards such as flooding or seiches? __ _/ 3. Air Quail cy. Will the proposal have signif icanc results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or Snd irect sources? Stationary sources? _ b. Deterlorat ion of ambient air quality and/or interference with the attainment of applicable / air quality standards? _/ c. Alteration of local or regional cLimaclc conditions, affecting air movement, mo iscure / or cemperacu re? _/ 4. B1oca Flora. Will [he proposal have signif icanc results in: • a. Change in the characteristics of species, Snclud Sng diversity, distribution, or number of any species of planes? _ _ D. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare / or esdangered.spec les of planes? _ _/ /3 7. Fa.e 1 YES :aYdE ti0 • c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of - plants into an area? / d. Reduction in [he potential for agricultural production? Y~ Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in [he characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? / b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? / c. Introduction of new or disrup [ive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier f i l ? / [o the migra tlon or movement o an ma s _ d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or i d if bi / / e ha tat? w l l 5. Pcauia[ion. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will [he proposal alter the location, distri- • bution, density, diversity, or grow [h race of f ? an area [he human popular Sort o _ b. Will the pzooosal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have s ignif Scan[ resin [s in: a. Change is local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax race, and property ~, values? b. W111 project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i. e., buyers, / [ax payers or project users? _/ 7. Land Use and Plannine Cons idera [ions. Will [he proposal have significant results in? a. A subs [antial alteration of the present or / planned land use of an area? _/ b. A conflict with any designations, obj ec[ives, or adopted plans of any governmental policies , ? entities _ c. M impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive recreatlnna 1. opportunities? __ _/ /7 ~ Page 4 YES NAY-= \0 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have signlf leant . res ults in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? / 1~ b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for nev street construction? c. Effects on existing packing facilities, or demand for nev parking? ,/ d. Substantial impact upon existing cransporca- [ion systems? e. Al[erat ions to present patterns of Circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential eater-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? / g. Increases in traffic hazards co motor vehicles, bi li t d i / cyc s s or pe estr ans? / 9. Cultural P.crourcca. W1.. ~„ proposal Lave signiiicanc-resin [s in:'• • a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleoncologlcal, and/or historical resources? 10. Health. SaEerv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the pro posal have slgnif icanc results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ,~ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous sub seances 1n the even[ of an accident? d. M increase in the number of individuals or species of vet cor or patheno gen is organ SSms or the exposure of people to such organisms? ~ e. Increase in existing noise levels? f f. Exposure of people to po cencia lly dangerous noise levels? ~ f b [S bl Th i d • g. ona on o o }ec e o e creat ors? ~ h. M increase in light or glare? ~% ~~y Page 5 Il. Aesthetics. Will Che proposal have signif Scan[ • results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creaxion of an aesthecica lly offensive site? _- / c. A conE lict wl th [he objective cf designated or poxential scenic corridors? ~ 12. L't 11 Sties and Puh lit Services. Will [he proposal have a signif SC ant need For new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Elect rlc power? ~ b. Natural or packaged gas? ,/ c. Coamunita[fons systems? ~ d. Water supply? / e. Wastewater facilities? / f. Flood control strut cures? / g. Solid waste facilities? ,~ h. Fire protection? ,/ i. Police pro test San? ~ ~. Schools? ~ k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including toads and flood control facilities? ~ m. Other governaen[al services? ~/ 13. Energy and Scarce Resource W111 the proposal have significant resu its in: a, Llse of substantial or excessive Euel or energy? ~ b. Substantial increase 1n demand upon existing sources of energy? - c. M increase Sn [he demand far development of new sources of energy? d, M increase or perp e[ua [ion of [he consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when feas lb le renewable sources of energy are available? / _ - /~S Page 6 Y=5 "~a=~S` YO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resour ? ce • 14. Honda tore Find ings of Slgniffcanc . a. Does the project have the potential to degrade [he quality of [he environment, substantially reduce Che habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a Fish or wildlife population co drop below self sustaining levels, threaten [o eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number oz restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or i an mal or eliminate important examples of the major i d per o s of California history or prehistory? -_ ~_ / b. Does Che project have the potential to achieve short-term, to [he disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well Into the future) . ~ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (C~mulatively considerable means [hat [he incremental effects of an . individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with Che effects of past projects , and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effec cs on human beings, either directly or indirectly? __ II. DISCUS SIOV OF ENVIAO!I~¢VTAL EVALUATION (i. e., of affix~ative answers co the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). r U /2 ~i Page i III. DETE3tlINATION • On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environmen [, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION viii 6e prepared. _ I find [hac although the proposed project could have a significanc effecc on the environmenc, there viii noc be a significanc effecc in [his case because [he mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added [o the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL SE PREPARED. ^ I fintl the proposed project MAY envirnmenc, and an ENVIRONPIENT Da [e ~oril 9~19~tS • /.I 7 ORDINANCE N0. ~-6-k5k1Y .?G1- • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 85-04 AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM "L" TO "ISP" FOR 2.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND MAIN - APN 209-062-01, 02 The City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the above-described Development District Amendment, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That the subject property is suitable for this change in terms of access, size, and compatibility • with existing land use in the surrounding area; and C. That the proposed Development District Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and, D. That the proposed Development District Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. E. This amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration ffled herein. SECTION 2: The subject real property is hereby redesignated in the manner stated, and the Development District Map is hereby amended accordingly, The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (16) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /.t $ Resolution No. P-5-15-1-0 DDA 85-04 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of MAY, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: ever y A. Authelet, City Clerk l J I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • California, do herehy certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the * day of *, 19**, and was finally passed at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the * day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every Authe et, City Clerk • i.t9 • ORDINANCE N0. 1~5-8}-i-~ 9G-A' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 30 OF THIS COUNCIL REGARDING FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Suhsect ion 3(h) of Ordinance No. 30 of this Council hereby is amended to read as follows: "(b) The term "dwelling unit" as utilized in this Ordinance No. 30 includes each single family dwelling and each unit of a multiple unit dwelling structure designed as a separate habitation for ane (1) or more occupants except those excluded below in this subsection 3(b). The term "dwelling unit" also includes new factory-built housing installed in accordance with Section 19950, et sep., of the • Health and Safety Code of the State of California. The term "dwelling unit" as utilized in this Ordinance No. 30 shall not include a caretaker's residence, a convalescent facility, an elder cottage, a hotel, a lodging unit or a residential care facility as those facilities are defined in Section 11.02.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, further, the term "dwelling unit" as utilized in this Ordinance No. 30 does not include a senior housing facility constructed pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.20.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code." SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to 6e published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City op Ontario, Ca iforn ia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • ~~_. /3O Kai • • -- CITY OF RA\'CHO CtiCAMO\GA ~c~i,iro STAFF REPORT .~ ~ j ,~ <. ~ ~ ,..,~ A_ '~> ir J l r z F ~, Z DATE: May 15, 1985 19` T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B, Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Day Creek Community Facilities District Ordinance authorizing the levy of special tax Attached for Council execution is an Ordinance authorizing levy of the Day Creek Tax, The Ordinance enables levy of the taz under the conditions approved by the taz election. The actual tax rate for each year would be established by resolution no later than the second meeting in July of each year. As you know, the District authorized a maximum tax rate of E550 per acre per year to support a 520,225,000 bond issue. We are currently structuring a bond sale of between 515,000,000 and E17,000,000 to fund initial construction. The tax rate is anticipated to be E350 per year. Financial consultants are developing the details of the bond program and they will be available prior to second reading of this Ordinance and actual establishment of the tax rate. It now appears that we xould never have to exceed the 5350 per acre rate and that the levy would decline as the Redevelopment Tax increment expands. Again, I would like to streets that the proposed Ordinance is only administrative in nature and does not actually levy the tax, That action would occur 6y resolution prior to bond sale in the month of July. RECOMMENORTION It is recommended that Council adopt the Ord inante Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax in a Community Facilities District. ' /Res~ctfully sub tted, LBH. as Attachment /3/ • ORDINANCE N0. 263 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CODNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CDCANONGA, CALIPORN IA, AOTHORI2INC THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAR IN A COlONNITY FACItIT IES DIRTRICT WIIEREA3, the Ci [y Coua cil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as [he "legislative body of [he local Agency^), bas initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a epecial [a: i^ a community facilities district, all ae authorized pursuant [o the terms sod prw is ions of the 'Me1lo-ROOa Co®uni ty Paciliti ee Act of 1982", being Chep[er 2.5, Part 1, Div iei on 2, Ti [le 5 of the Government Code of the State of Cel if ornia. This Co®unify Pacilitiea Di err ict shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to es the "District"); sad :::.w, ^aoorv , . i3 flEREET ORDAINED A5 FOLLONS: • SECTION^1 ~: ~That+the above recitals are all [rue end correct. SECTION 2: That thin legisla Live body does, by the passage of [his Ordinance, authorize the levy of special taws at the rate and formula and set forth in exhibit "A" attached hereto, referenced and eo incorporated. SECTION 3: That Chia legislative body is hereby further au[h orized each year, by Reealution, to de term ins [he epecif is epecial tax rate and emouot [a be levied for the next fiscal year, eacept that the epecial tax rate co be levied shall sot exceed Chet ae set for eh shove, but the epecial ter may be levied eta lover rate. Said Reeoluti on shell be adopted no later then the 2nd meeting io July of ee ch year. SECTION 4: Properties or soli tiers of the State, Pederal or other local gwer~ente ehnll be exempt from Che above-referenced and approved ape ci el tea. SECTIOE 5: The proceeds of the above authorized and levied epecial tax may Daly be used to peq, in whole or in pert, [he Coate of [he following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of aad interest on soy outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary tepleniehment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds. C. Payment of cos [e and expeoaee of authorized public foci lilies aad public •erv ice e. /3~- Ordinance No. 263 Page 2 D. Repayment of advances and loans, ae appropriate. The proceeds of [be ape tial tan shall be levied only so long as needed for its purpose, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 6: The above authorized ape cial Caa ehatl be collected in [he same manner ae ordinary ad valorem razes are ccl lected and shall be subject to the same penalties and Che same procedure and sale in cases Of delinquenci ee for say other ad valorem can. SECTION 7: That chin Ordinance shall be in force and take effect thirty (30) days after its final pa eeege, and ibis epecif is author izati oo ie pursuant to the proviei one of Section 53340 of the Gaverc®ent Code of the Slate of California. 9ECTION 8: The Mayor shall ai gn thin Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published vithin fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dailv eeoort, a nevapaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, cad circulated in [he Ci tq of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca lif ornie. PASSED, APP80VE0, sod ADOPTED this day of , 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST; A. Au[hele[, City Ct ark I, BEVERLY A. AUTBELET, CITY CLERK of [he Ci [y of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal if orn:a, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced et a zegu ler meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 15th day of Hay, 1985, and vac finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council o£ the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1985. • • /33 Ordinance No. 263 Page 3 • Eaecuted this day of 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga, Cel it ornia. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk EAIIB IT "A" The Community Facilities Die [r ict has beev divided into tro zones: 1. ZOBE ^A": General erase to be served by [he drainage faci liti ea, exclusive of Zone "B". 2. 20NE '$": A limited area, being only partially served by drainage facilities. Zone '$" consists of those proper[i ee bounded on the South by FOOTHILL BODLEVARD, on [be Eeet by ROCHESTER AV@IOE, on the Nor t6 by HASE LINE ROAD, avd on [he Nest by [he prol onga [i an of MILLIREN AYENDE. The rate, method and formula for the levy of the ape ci al [aa for [he respective zone e, being Zone "A" avd Zone '$", ie ae follwre, based upon a bond amount not [o exceed $20,225,000.00, payable war a period of years na[ to exceed [revty (20) years. ZONE "A": NOT TO ERCEED $550.00 PER ACRE. ZONE "B": NOT TO ERCEED $550.00 PER ACRE for 190 ACRES. At such time ae [he final drainage plan fie eetabl fished for Zone '$". Ov ly those properties the[ drai^ into the DAY CREEK CHANNEL shell be subject to the special drainage Eee. Areas of Zone "B" in excess of 190 scree that do drain into the DAY CREER CHANNEL shall be subject to a drainage fee. For parti culare, ref ezence fie made to the '$eport" of the Engineer, ae approved by the City Council avd an file in the Office of the Ci[y Clerk. /3y ---- CITY OF RANCHO CCCA~[ONGA ~~c.~.~r~ STAFF REPORT 2>~%!~~~~~. • _~ ~= ,~ ~ A _ ~. _Z DATE: May i5, 1985 - ~ i9-s :O: Mawr and Members of t:e City Council i FRCM: Jack Lam, AICP, Cortna~nity Develoarent Dire^_tor BY: Lida D. Daniels, Senior RedeveloEment Analyst SUB.TECP: MLT,TIPLE FAMILY RE+fl'AL HOUSING DbR'R'.AGE FINANCE PROG.RhM BDall~(]!a: At the meeting of May 1, 1985, the City Council direct_d staff to prepare a variety of additional infonnaticn regazding the Multiple Family Rental Housrng Mortgage finance Program. Due to the magnitude ar:d crn~lexity of the Bord Program, staff has not been able to fully assess t':e Einarcial and required staff impacts that the Program might have, nor has any meaningful needs assessment and criteria been prepared in the given two week time period. This is due to tte fact that the County of San Bernardino has accepted applications for eleven (111 projects and actual demand cannot be deternuned if the City were • to begin administering the Program. ANALYSIS: As indicated at the May 1, 1995 meeting, the 1985 State Multi-Family bonding capacity had been utii izcd. There is legislation which is presently being considered which would increase the State ceiling ty 5600,000,000. It is not possible, however, based cn current workloads that staff would be. able to acfiunister the application requests and interests in the stort period of time that is expected to be available before the additional capacity is utilized. There is oce developer (TPP Developnentl, however, that has an executed Developer Agreement with the City Council for the develc~ment of a senior citizens apartment project. Doe to *_his prior Developer Aareetrent .for the project, the City Cocr:cil may wish to consider acthorizing oriority for this specs. is project to prcc~ed m using the tax exempt frnancing Program. It might be possible to administer the Procram for this ore request using present City resources and staff, provided the developer can have credit erharcement and provided the "win3ow" does not close before all docunvsts and hearirgs are ca~leted. One Council memb=r has r_quest_d that staff r=_search the possibility of the Redeveloptn?nt Agency sponsoring and administering the Multr-Family Bond Program. In response to this request, staff has found that the Agency could sponsor a Program, however, only those projects which are lecated in the project azea can participate. If the Agency initiates a program, the minimum requirements of the legislation are still enforced but the Agency is not required to obtain a part of the limited alloca- tion Ezan the State. Thus, a Program done by t:.e Agency would not carQ~ete for limited bond allocation. There are however, aspects of the i3B C?T'Y CCLTiC1L STAFF RFFOFT M.ati-Famil}' Rental Housing Mortgage Finance Program May 15, 1985 Page 2 . program which would not allow smaller builder, *^ partici~.ate. Should Council wish tc pursue an Agency Program, a feasibility study should to undertaken at the participating developer's expense and criteria developed fran this study. Eluther, while staff has informally camwnicated to the County that the City may consider administering its own program, Council may wish to now direct staff to formally notify the County of the desired change in the administration of the Frcgram. RDC~!ffi~1'ICN: Staff recamiends that the foLln.~irg actions be taken with respect to the Multiple Family Rental Housing hbrtgaye Finance Program: 1. The City Council direct staff to pcoceed with a 1985 Multiple Family Renal Housing Mortgage 2inance Program for TAC Developrent oily. Said Program would be for servicing the mnstructon of a senior citiaens multi-Eamily housing project. 2. Direct staff to obtain a feasibility study £or a naxlti-family mortgage bald program if Council wishes to pursue either n • RedevelopUent Agency program ox a 1986 Cih~ program. Said feasibility study is to include an evaluation of the City resources that mould be necessary tc administer the program. 3. Provide Eormal mcfinre[ion to the County of San Bernardino, Office of Camnxnity Developnent, and rtquest that no action should he taker. or. the applications which have already been received and that the County accept no additional Multiple Family Bond applications for projects in the City. Respectfully srtmitted, JACK LAM, AICP Cmmunity Developtmnt Director JL:IU:kap • i39 . nr.. n ~•n rrn nr.n . • r~ U - vu a va nn:~i.aav ~,,. a.n.rav:wn L~;p~,\IO STAFF REPORT ~/~~9^ ~; a.-~ DATE: May 15, 1985 = ~+ ~~~~~~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council 19 FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: ~ Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMISSION Recently, the City Council requested the City's Planning Commission to develop policy recommendations relative to the Citizens Advisory Commission recommendations on General Plan densities. As you know, the Citizens Advisory Commission recommended reconsideration of the residential categories in the City's General Plan. In summary, the CAC recommended that substantial across-the-board reductions in General Plan densities be considered. The specific CAC recommendations are noted below: Land Use Cate orb Existin Proposed VL ~ No Change L 2-4 No Change LM 4-8 5-6 M 8-14 7-9 MH 14-24 10-13 H 24-30 14-18 In addition, the Advisory Commission recommended that for densities above 19 units to the acre, the category of "I" (representing intense development) be created. This category would be permitted on no more than one-tenth of a percent (.1%) of the residentially zoned land in the City and would be controlled by a Conditional Use process. The reasons for these recommendations are outlined in the CAC Resolution attached to this report. As percef ved by the CAC, they are: (1) the desire to maintain a rural environment in the City, (2) construction of large amounts of high density projects in the past, (3) number of high density projects already approved, and (4) too many such high density projects are inconsistent with the wishes of the residents of the City. Staff provided the Planning Commission with a report, including an analysis of the implications of the proposed reductions (please see attached staff report). As part of the review, the Planning Commission considered the report, and several basic policy alternatives. Again, these alternatives are described in detail in the attached Planning Commission report. In summary, the alternatives which were considered by the Planning Commission are noted below: iyo CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Land Use Recommendations by the CAC May 15, 1985 Page 2 • Alternative 1: Reduce density per CAC recommendations. Alternative 2: Reduce density through: Option A: Reduction in specific land use categories only. Lion 6: Reduction in site specific areas only; or Lion C: Combination of A 6 8 above. Alternative 3: Ro change recommended to the City's General Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSS IDN The Commission discussed the matter at length, and reached the consensus on a number of items as noted below: o The City should respect its previous commitments relative to permitted densities in the Planned Communities, areas already approved for development, and areas subject to Development • Agreements. o The City's General Plan and Development Cade are the result of many years of comprehensive planning, public hearings, and effort by many individuals; residents, public officials and the private sector. Though some modifications might be appropriate, wholesale revisions to the General Plan and Development Code would not 6e desirable at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENOAT IONS Though the Commission reached the consensus on the items above, there was a split vote (in the absence of one Commissioner) as to the specific recommendation to be forwarded to the City Council. Consequently, the following is presented for your consideration: Two votes for Alternative 3: No change recommended. This would in effect confirm the validity o` the City's current General Plan and Development Code. Two votes for Alternative 2, Option B: Reduction of Density through consideration of site specific areas only. This would result in possible reduction in densities through the reassessment of specific density designations for all vacant residential land not yet approved or otherwise commited for development. Part of the analysis would 6e a site-by-site review of upper density • designations in site specific areas in various locations. /'1/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Land Use Recommendations by the CAC May 15, 1985 Page 3 • RECOMMENDATION Staff is respectfully requesting specific policy direction, either confirming the Planning Commission's position or selecting from the othey plternat iye'slavailab le. submitted: :OK Attachment: Planning Conmtiss ion Staff Report Exhibit "A" - CAC Resolution Exhibit "B" - Vacant uncommitted land subject to the Oeve lapment Code. • /4~ - CITY OF RAtiCHO CCCAMODIGA cccnn+o STAFF REPORT ~~ j v9. • x ~ ~ s Q DATE: May 9, 1985 19' i T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMI ION I. ABSTRACT: This report outlines CAC recommendations on General Plan Density reductions, and notes the implications. it also provides policy options to 6e considered by the Commission. Staff is seeking policy direction only, for recommendation to the City Council. II. BACKGROUND: At a recent Citizens Advisory Commission meeting, a resolution was passed recommending to the City Council a • reconsideration of the residential categories in the City's General Plan. the CAC Resolution, attached to this report as Exhibit "A", recommends substantial across the board reductions in densities in all residential land use categories from Low Medium and higher. Specific CAC reconm~endations are noted below: Land Use Cateaorv Existin Proposed VL ~ No Change L 2-4 No Change LM 4-8 5-6 M 8-14 7-9 MH 14-24 10-13 H 24-30 14-18 1n addition, the CAC recommended that for densities above 19 units to the acre, a category of "I" (representing intense development), be created. This category would be permitted an no more than one- tenth of a percent (.1X) of the residentially zoned land in the City and would be controlled by a Conditional Use Permit process, which would demand "amelioration of all effects of high density to a degree that they have no greater impact on the resources and adverse affects of crowding than would one dwelifng unit per acre". The reasons for this recommendation 6y the CRC are also stated in the resolution (please see resolution for specific text). They can be summarized as follows: ITEM 0 /y3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CAC Land Use Recommendations May 8, 1985 Page 2 • 1. Desire to maintain a rural environment in the City; 2. Construction of large amounts of high density projects in the past; 3. Number of high density projects already approved; 4. Tno many such high density projects are inconsistent with the wishes of the residents of the City. The City Council has briefly considered the CAC resolution and referred the item to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation on the general direction the City Council should take on this matter. The item is scheduled for Council review (basic policy issues only) at the May 15, 1985 City Council meeting. III. ANALYSIS: The recommendations made by the CAC have far-reaching implications affecting just about all development related areas under the City's jurisd ict ton. Adoption of the CAC recommendations as presented to the City would necessitate major changes in the • City's General Plan and other regulatory documents affecting public policy. To implement the recommendations, the following plans and documents would require modification: General Plan: Revisions to several mandated elements of the enera an would be required, including land use, circulation, housing, pu611c safety, and recreation, to correct an imbalance between housing and commercial/industrial uses, to reassess demand for infrastructure, modify service provisions, etc. The changes would be required to provide internal consistency among all mandated General Plan elements. This would be a major effort involving substantial resources. Zon ing (Development District) Map: Modify des ignatfons for consistency with the General Pan to assure balance among General Plan and zoning categories. Development Code: Restructure and modify most residential categories to assure consistency with General Plan. Modify specffic development standards to be reflective of new density ranges. Develop criteria for "I" designation as recommended by CAC. r1 /Ny PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CAC Land Use Reconmendat ions May 8, 1985 Page 3 r 1 U Planned Communities/Specific Plans: The City's General Plan also controls Terra Vista, Victoria, and Caryn Planned Communities, in addition to the Et iwanda Specific Plan. All these areas are not governed by the Development Code, but have their own text developed to deal with specific circumstances. To complicate the matter, the City also has development agreements with the builders of Terra Vista and Caryn Planned Comnun it ies, which legally bind the City to long-term land use commitments. The City's substantial financial stake in the Victoria Regional Center also complicates any potential revisions which might result in substantial density decreases in the Victoria Planned Community. Other Issues: In addition to the regulatory documents, the City would need to reassess its capital improvement program, parks program and long-term planning for major facilities. Special districts providing services in the City would also be affected fn their long-range planning and implementation. All these changes would require a coordinated effort on the part of the City's various departments and special districts. • Should the Planning Commission concur with the recommendations of the CAC, staff will prepare a detailed work program to deal effectively with all the necessary changes and will incorporate these changes into Fiscal 85-86 program year for City Council review. IV. POLICY ALTERNATIVES: Should the Commission concur with some of the goals expressed by the Advisory Commission but find itself reluctant to attempt a wholesale revision of the City's General Plan and related documents, other policy options could be considered. These options could result in an overall reduction in density with particular emphasis on those areas the Commission might consider appropriate. The first question that must be answered is whether or not whatever density reductions take place should occur citywide, thus affecting the General Plan, or outside of the planned communities only (i.e. in the area governed by the Development Code). Staff will need specific direction in this area, as well as feedback on the following options: )~ iys PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CAC Land Use Recommendations May 8, 1985 Page 4 • Option A: Reduction in Specific Land Use Categories On1v This would rovolve review of individual land use categories for po ss i6le modifications. Since a specific area of concern to the CAC are densities above 19 du/ac, the Commission may wish to consider modifying the MH and H categories as follows: Designation Ex~ist_i_ng~ Pro osed MH 14 24 du/ac - 9 du/ac Densities above 19 du/ac permitted with specific findings only (CUP ?) H 24-30 du/ac 24-27 du/ac Densities above 27 du/ac permitted with specific findings only These mod if icattons would result in narrowing the density range spread in the higher density categories. Further, the City would be in a position to require that the adverse affects of high density be ameliorated through the appiication of specific • mandatory findings. Staff will need specific direction as to whether this approach is appropriate and if so, which land use categories are to be considered for revision. Option 8 -Reduction in Site-Specific Areas Only Another way of accomplishing an overall decrease in density would be to reassess the density designations for all vacant residential land not yet approved for development. This would involve site-by-site review of upper density designations in various locations. the attached Exhibit "B" indicates all such land outside the planned communities currently designated Medium, Medium-High, and High density, but not yet approved for development by the City. The Commission may wish to consider a redesignation of some of these site-specific areas to lower density designations. Staff will need specific direction on this policy option. Option C - Combination of A and 8 Above Reduction in both density categories and site-specific locations) This would involve an assessment of both land use category designations and site-specific locations, as described above. This option has the potential of reducfng overall densities substantially without drastic changes fn either the text and • provisions of the Development Code, or wholesale site-specific designation changes. /Y 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CRC Land Use Recommendations May 8, 1985 Page 5 Staff will need direction as to the feasibility of this policy option. The final policy alternative for consideration is no change. The Commission may select this alternative if it feeis the City's General Plan and Development Code are well balanced and that no substantial changes are warranted. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: At this point, staff needs policy direction only. o icy alternatives and options available are noted below. Alternative 1: Reduce density per CAC recoawendations. r 1 L_J Alternative 2: Reduce density through: lion Reduction in specific land use categories only; or Option B: Reduction in site-specific areas only; or Option C: Comb in at ton of A & B above. Alternative 3: Ro change recoaaaended It is respectfully requested that the Commission provide staff with specific policy direction to he forwarded to the City Council. /'f ~ CITI' OF RANCHO CL'CA~tOtiG.a MEI~IORAtiDU~i Apra 13r 1905 T0: Mayor and Members of Ci*.y Council FROM: Advisory Commission Members BY: Hobert A. Rizzo f(~,I Assistant to City :tanager 1A`/~ SDHSEC^.: Land Clse Recommendations by Advisory Commission ~: , -, ~~ r z '> :?" i The pdvlsory Commission at its !larch 28, 1985 meeting recommended that the following information be forwarded to the City Council and Planning Commission for consideration. The Advisory Commission finds and recommends as follows: • 'Chas City has long desired to maintain a rural environment to the maximum extent feasible. This City has allowed the construction of large aaounts of high density dwellings during the past two years. There are many more high density dwelling projects aDProved or awaiting approval. Too many high density dwelling projects are Snconslstent vlth the wishes of the citizens of thSs City, deteriorate our resources and produce serious consequences of croud;ng. Swift and _ :fain limns must be placed on the pro iife ra eon o` h_gh density Quelling pro~ec ts. AESOLPED that the pdvlsory Commission recommends to the City Council and Planning Commission that the general plan antl zo¢ing ordinances of this Clty be amended to affect a change Sn allowable density ranges along the fo llowing guidelines: Continued.... .~ ,y~ ~:~y~T ~~ r April 10, 1985 2 ;and Use flenommendatSons • AANGE SIZE SIZE NA!'~ NaY PflOPOSED VL no change no Chang? ' no change no change ~ 4-8 5-6 M g_tµ 7_9 t43 t4-24 10_t3 A 24-30 14-18 I 19 or more CUP RESOLVED further that any imbalance this creates in the general and zoning plans should be ad,~usted by commercial and industrial changes. AESOLYED Further that the category ^I" represents intense development, that it be permitted on no more than 1/10 of iS o£ the resSdentially zoned land and that St be controlled by conditional use permit standards which demand amelloratlon of all effects of high denalty to a degree that they have no greater Smpact on the resources and adverse affects of crowding than would one dwelling unit to the acre. If you have any questSOns or concerns regarding this matter, • please feel Cree to contact me. AAA:mk • iy9 HR T lL a ///. ~ 5 vL ~ v~ i - - ` ` ~ _.-- a ~/~ -----'---~ ~ -iii =- ~ L ~~ ~. , ..I ,~- _ .-. t -~. - i .._, _ _s f ..VL 1 J ~VL ~! 'III Vl _ L LM fy ...._ vt, '~~-' -Li' _II _~i`., ~ .. •r ~~ of ~j ki IN /w •.~1'r ~ii~l~- e~~1 ~~fi ... r ~..c ~.l_r~4NC MNE~- .~~r i Id iLl.l. T..r r 'A'LA--. p; Lif}• ~~ ~I~ci., .F .I, p L ~IfI/; ~.1 ,' ,L '. ~ "~~li ~c ~ "~ ~ .'fig III L ~ ~~T. .~ : ~ i-.~ _ ^, i : : "1, ~~ rr TENN> VISTR PLANN .r ~ I ,.(u ` M i, i ~. I I i rl~ i~~.1 II s'_.J ~ C. c• •k 1 L ~.~.0 ' ..,~ iI « MINIM?'• ~' P ~*~ ~-- ~ ~ INOUSTXILL 5 .f1-_..,L_.. __ -_- \ uu..n i .~w.~l .: '~ .I ' ~\ ...' . i~ 1 t i I I .~.~~ i Tn.u .................... EvAU44 ~s„ EXHIBIT'"B" .17icK Scott, irk. April 14, 1985 ?tc. Iauren Wasserman City manager City of Rancho Cucamonca P.O. Box BO% 9:~0 Baseline Avenue, Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, California 51i3G Dear Lauren: Re: Property At North End Of Hermosa Avenue • As you know, we ace Curren [ly developing the easter:y side of the above referenced prepe r[y, in a project known as "The Wccds". This development was the subject of numerous commcr.ica tions, letters, and other negotiations, spanning a _several year period, the result of which has been the eevelopment which is now underway. This level ocxnen [, and the property cn the west side cf Hermosa, which we own, are unique ones, with the stand of trees, etc. She pla nni nq orocess fcr the property on [he east side of Hermosa, currently under development, was accorded top oriori [y by all offer Led departments anti groups in an effort to preserve [he visual and aesthetic resources and as many of the trees as possible, and to create a na [ural setting without extensive or.-site grading. Duri no [he planning process, we questioned the wisdom in removing literally hundreds of additional trees, in order to provide a network of eaues [rian trails, when, s[a ti s[ically, only a small fraction of hone owners in the area north of ea nyon have horses, (according to information furnished to me by both city staff and by hls. Pam Henry, of [he equestrian commit tee i. However, in of for[ tc resolve all ma [[ers harmoniously, we agreed to installation of all of the trails, including, an extremely expensive trail, at the insistence of the project planner, immediately adjacent to Hermosa Avenue, on the ea s[ side. To install this [rail, we had [o remove trees to a distance of approximately 30' from the curb line, and perform 1111 WEST NIN TH STp EET • VPLA ND. CA LIFO RNIA9V86 91d~906~1802 / S/ ~. Lauren Wasserman April 19, 1985 Page 2 extensive grading, hoth elements which we had he ped to avcid in an effcrt to preserve the aesthetics and natural beauty of the area. In June of 1980, we bega r. land planning for the prcperty cn the west side of Hemesa, and prepared a number of schematics which seemed to meet the criteria of the planning staff and other affected agencies. After a number of meetings, reviews, etc., we concluded that the design criteria for .hat particular parcel was more intensively affected by geographical matters than the east side. Significant ammo the geographical matters are [he gradients of the property, [he configuration, and the creek running through the property which will become a portion of the Alta Loma storm drain facilities, for which we have given easements to the storm drain district. Accordingly, our plans were revised to meet the engineering criteria, and after several meetings with staff and various committees, we appear to have solved all matters as they relate to the land use concept, configuration and gradient, including an agreement to individualize custom type houses nn certain of the lets, with attractive bridge driveways, etc. In addition, we agreed to the City's consul [ing geologist reviewing the geological and seismic data submitted on the property by Richard Mi71s and Associates. • In short, we seem to have brought the proposed de~~elopment [o a point of . acceptance by ail affected City departments, however, the same situation is not true with [he equestrian cortuoi tree, whom I understand is an appointed group to give advice to the s[af f, Planning Commas ion, and the Ccuncil. At your s~xgestion, cn Tuesday, April 16, 1985, I met with Ms. Pam Hency7 in attenaance was she, Mr. Bruce La Claire, of my office, and 7. 7 found her to be a charmi nq person, who appeared [o understand our concerns over the apparent mandates of the equestrian committee, but who reiterates the ccmmi tree's position that it would be necessary for there [o be three "north-to-south" equestrian trails within a distance eE 300' to 600'. In her analysis, she prejec[ed the opinion that since the general plan cf the City shows an equestrian trail parallel with the creek bed, that this exact location is mandated into the General Plan. Perhaps [his is true, however, my understanding of the intent of the general plan, and in the shcwing of equestrian trails thereon, is that certain flexibility be accorded in the exact locations, depending on such circumstances as grades, drainage facilities, topographical, and aesthetic situations. Frankly, we are a[ a quandary. If the equestrian camni tree's insistence prevails, we will be Forced to remove hundreds of additional trees, bisect a number of lots, with an easement Eor an equestrian trail, for only approximately 158 of the people in the city, and do it with the knowledge • that it would parallel an additional planned trail located approximately 100' to 15U' to the rest. /Si Mr. Lauren 5lassermar. April i4, 15E5 Pace • ]n addition, the bisecting of individual lots with such trails tai ses a series of legal, liability, maintenance, and inva lien of privacy elements, which we do not feel is in [he best interests of the prospective purchasers of these houses, cr the City. We are reluctant to formalize an appeal of this matter tc the City Council, since we strive Ccwacd the working out of land use patterns, with staff, and other affected groups, to arrive at acceptable compromises, when there appears to be oood reason for doing so. However, ?ts. Henry, has indicated that the equestrian committee is adamant on [heir insistence upon a trail fcl'_cwina the creek bed, which would bisect a number of the lots. iVe also question the essentiality of the extent of equestrian ^_cails, when there are a number of prospective purchasers of homes, who do not wish to maintain eques [rian far ili ties nor to part ici pa to in the equestrian life- style. In fact, the City statistics show that the vast ma _.oci ty of home buyers do not wish to own horses. we realize [ha[ Che problems se[ out in [his letter, are comprehensive, and may require more time for a detailed study on [he part of the City; unfortunately, however, existing time constraints give us, in terms cf our commitments to retire debt on [he property, no more time to devote [o long negotiations. • +LS. Nervy indicated that the equestrian cemmi tree ~.:as in temple to accord with the trail sys [em as se[ euC cr, our tentative .-iap far Lots i through i2. For that reason, we request [he following: Allow us [o process, on an interim basis, [e r. [a ti ve teat[ 12902 coveei ne Lots 1 through 7L only, _=o that we could obtain immediate tentative approval, for these ]Z lots, and proceed with enc ineeci ng, reccrca [ion, and construction as expeditiously as possible. Request [he Ci [y Council Lake [his matter under advisement, on a fcrmali zed basis, (not of an appeal na turei, to discuss the essentiality of having an additional trail parallel [e the ore which we are Co cons Cruet en [he east side of Hermosa, when there is ar. adeiticnal community trail scheduled on the westerly portion of cur property, at the top of the slope, through Tract lOCBA, so that there would be, in effect, three north-south trails within, as stated herein, 300' [0 8CC' of each other, with the necessary removal cf hundreds of additional Crees. Pursuant there CC, iE i[ is found that the creek [rail is [o be a requirement for the development of the balance of our property, we would request guidance in the method in which the City proposes to allow each individual lo[ owner to utilize his lot, without excessive invasions cf privacy, and without the liability to he incurred by allowing full use, by the equestrians, of the property, to the west of the proposed trail bi sorting the lots, as the equestrian committee requests. It is our understanding that the Ci[y does not wish to assume this liability, we do not wish to do so, and I think it a fair assumption that the purchasers of homes would prefer not to do so. ys3 ~. Lauren i7assernan April la, 1485 Pzae 4 I hope that the camnents contain in this letter will indicate our sincere in Ceres[ in solvi no a situation in a harmonious nature, withcut friction, in a spirit of cooperation, between the City, ourselves, and the ecuestrian facticns, bearing in mind all factors as enumerated herein. Should you approve of this reasonable request, we would be able to prcceed with development of that portion of property in which we are in full agreement with [he standards set out by all of the affected City departments, and by the equestrian coirtni ttee, as related to Lo[s 7 throuoh 12, and expeditiously, obtain answers to questions as they affect [.ots 13 thrcugh ? , so that the balance of the protect cculd be presented to the cgmni ssion, and the Council, with all parties in agreement. Sincerely, Richard N. Scott President Dick Scott, Inc. RNS/ca • • / SY ``~ . ~ '7 ~'~~~ \ __ ` . ___. > .In__ .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w.ya. Jon Il. \likelx I nuur~Mrmbr. 1'harle~.l. Itu4uet II .Ie f(ny Rwe Richard )1. Ilahi I'amela.l.N rich! Hay b, 1985 Planning Commission Ad Roc Rev iev Suhcommi[tee Dear *: SOBJECT: Design Rev iev of Tentative Tr ac[ Ro. 10349 At a meeting on May 4, 1985, the Thoroughbred Street Romewners expressed their concerns and de ai rea for the development to be constructed by Plaza Builders adjacent to [heir homes. They exp reseed both ape cif is and general concerns. Requests for de ai gn review coneiderati on and some specific recommendations are summarized belw: • Azc hitecture 1. Facia and exterior clew ati one a. Preference eta tad for real brick and stone - request design review c ommi[[ee establish percentage of coverage. b. Request review of front exterior vindw elevation al[ernativ ee. Request rev iev of chimney design. 2. Roofs a. Recommend that shake (coneietent with regulati ono) or concrete Cile be required. b, Recommend that pitch and angle be rev ieved. On-Site Imc covemen is I. Recommend that concrete dr iv evaye he required. 2. Recommend that front yard landecapi ng be required with: a. 803 coverage of front yard in cod, with balance in eh rubs, trees, and ground cover (alternatives should be made available to acv homewners) . 9880 BASELINE ROAD. SUITE (' • POST OFFICE 6(1%dW • RAN('RO ('C('A NIINf:A. I'A LIFO RNIA 91790 Ii1J19a9~1 N51 Nay 6, 1985 Page 2 b. Sprinkler system required (automatic preferred). • c. Minimum of 25 five gallon trees and shrubs. 3. Recommend that homes occupy a sir able portion of the frontage width, recognizing that [he lots will be wider in the Plaza Builder~e tract. 4. Recommend that a minimum square footage of 2400± 3S be required with a dia- tiibution of various air ea and el evati one throughout the tract. 5. Recommend [het larger homes 6e built adjacent to [he existing eastern ter- minus of Thoroughbred Street to tranBi Lion the two tracts for compatibility. 6, Recommend maeoary return val le with cap be required. Off-Site Improvements 1. Request concrete curb and gutter. 2. Request that continuation of liquid amber scree[ [rase on Thoroughbred east co Sapphire. 3. Recommend that circulation eye tam be required [o prw ids a minimum 452 bend in the extension of Thoroughbred Street easterly [o Sapphire, and that de- • sign elterna fives be presented and rev ieved by [he committee, consis cent with property drainage solution. 4, Recommend a distinct separation at [he interface of the tvo trot ta. The above ie intended Go give specific end general Ci [y Couo cil direction [o the Design Review Committee in its topside rati on of Tentative Tract No. 10349. Each councilmember hoe individually received the above and hoe expre eeed [heir concurrence in [he entirety of this memorandum. Sincerely, .lop D. Mikele Mayor SDM :baa Dietributicn: City Council City Manager Ci [y Attorney Community Development Di red or Ci [y Engi Weer . Mike Re16er P1 are Builds zs Thoroughbred Street Romeownere /SL ~.T V nc n n ~rr•un ~r •r ~ ~rnvr ~ -~ STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1985 70: FRO?1: BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City C~•uncil Rick Gomez, City Planner Gary Richards, Cade Enforcement Officer ESTABLISHMENT OF A VECTOR CONTROL ASSE SSMEN7 DISTRICT AB STRAC7: Numerous complaints have been received from City residents regarding flies, mosquitos, rats, and other rodents, thus prompting staff to investigate the possibilities of establishing a Vector Control Assessment District, or annexing into the existing West Valley Vector Control District to control the nuisances. OACKGROUND: Dn Tuesday, April 23, 1985, Gary Richards and myself met with Kenneth L. Jeske, Deputy Director Department of Environmental Health Services, to discuss the various options available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for additional Vector Control Service. • In this meeting, Mr, Jeske briefly outlined the various options the City could pursue. these options included the following: 1. Contracting for additional services with the County Vector Control District; 2. Establishment of a board-governing Assessment District; and 3. Establishment of a self-governing Assessment District. Option vl: Contract ina for Additional Services with County Vector Control District This option wou id require the City to provide additional funds each year for the hiring of an additional enforcement person by the County Vector Control Department. They would be trained and assigned to the county, but would be used primarily for inspections within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This option has three pitfalls: 1. The additional expense to the City 2. The City dealing directly with Vector Control complaints 3. The precedent of the Ci[y paying for service which could st :f le forming an assessment district at a later date. ,~,~>~ .. ~~,~ ~. `~ - ~. ter- I i3s CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Vector Control Assessment District May 15, 1985 Page 2 Option #2: Establishment of a Board-Govern inq Assessment District In Lhis option the County Board of Supervisors elects itself as Trustees with the formation of the Assessment District. The Assessment District/Community Service Area (CSA), with limited powers for vector control only, is controlled 6y the Board of Trustees with the assistance of an Advisory Committee selected by the Board of Supervisors. Even though the Advisory Committee would be made up of iocal residents and individuals, decisions for the District would be made by the Board of Supervisors. Option 43: Establishment of a Self-Govern inq Assessment District The forming of an Assessment District under option N3 would be conducted by the County Board of Supervisors. A Bgard of Trustees is made up of one representative from the County and four far the City which would govern the District. In both cases, any District would be co-terminus with the City boundaries. In creating a Special Assessment District in Rancho Cucamonga, the City would submit a request to the County Board of Supervisors for its formation. If approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Board would then direct LAFCO to review the request for its need and fiscal viability. [f the proposed Assessment District meets LAFCr,'s requirements, the Vector Control Distr ict• Board of Trustees then determines what assessments will be required to fund the Assessment District. The assessments recently determined for the West Valley Vector Control District, which includes portions of Ontario, Chino, Montclair and County unincorporated areas, were 59.00/yr for rasident ial, E15.00/yr for Commercial and Industrial, and 5150.00/yr for Dairies. Such assessments created by the Board of Trustees would not be available for the first year; therefore a temporary funding source would he required for this period of time to start up the District. The entire process of creating a Vector Control Assessment District under this option would take approximately 9 to 12 months. The benefits to the City would include: 1. 24-hour response to citizen's complaints. 2. More County manpower and inspectors for systematic enforcement. 3. The County manpower Lo educate local residents on Vector Control prab lems. 4. Earlier/frequent inspections to eliminate prgblem .traas. 5. At least 4 representatives on Board of Trustees for local Control. • 6. No cost to City. Services paid for through Assessment Oistr ict. /3C~ CITY COU'1C Il STAFF REPORT Vector Con tr0l Assessment D15tr iCt May 15, 1985 Page 3 • A fourth po ss i6le option ez fists; however, it is not completely defined at this time and, therefore, is uncertain. This option would entail the City annexing into the existing West Valley Vector Control District. Under this option, the City would request a noncontiguous annexation to the 'Rest Valley Vector Control District. The City would receive the same benefits as noted in the self-governing district, including representation on the West Valley Board of Trustees. In both options 3 and 4, staff would recommend contracting services with the County Vector Control District. RECGMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council pursue option 3 because of the additional benefits available to the City. However, if option 4 is feasible, that is if annexation on a noncontiguous basis with the existing West Valley Vector Control District is possible, then staff would recommend switching to this option with the intent of contracting with he County~Pgr Vector Control Services in either case. R jy ss'u6~i/i tted, } _, . ~ick RG: /77 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 385 North Arrowhead Avenue ~ San Berrerdirw, CA 92415-0160 ~ (714)3831677 0 East "D" Street • Ontario, CA 91764 • 1714) 9881324 75579 Eighth Street • Victorville, CA 92392. (6791 2453216 PLEASE REPLY TO AD DRESS CHECKED ."r j,wi May 1985 ~~ 1rp r~ ;).. )1::. . `. _ ~.f Mr. Rick Gomez, City Planner „ City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 INSECT AND RODENT VECTOR CONTROL COUNTY OF sAN BE8NA8DINO ENYINONMEN7AL - vusuc woxlls AcENa KENNETH C. TOPPING Deputy Atlministramr Cpmmunny Develppmem RICHARD L, R09Efl T5, P.S , M. P.H Decctor Aho aerving the rivet Pl.' AeelantP I NeMlea Barstow OnfariP Bry Bea, Lpke Rancep Cn/no Cucamnnsa Colton Redlandr Fenta,w Rralro Grand Teoxe San Bcrnmdmp Loma Lmda Upland Mnn lclan Narprvele Following up on our conversation regarding alternatives for vector control activities, I have researched the following: 1. Attached is a copy of the California Health and Safety Code e _erptc relatad t :eM or cc,,-.t roi • agencies. Please note, the Code provides for non- contiguous annexations to vector control districts. 2. I have Contacted Jim Roddy, LA FCo. LAFCD staff indicates the following order of preference: a. Contact the City of Ontario and annex the Ontario property between the district and Rancho Cucamonga as well as the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the West Va.i ley Vector Control District. b. Form a city assessment zone and contract with the County for services. c. Request a non-contiguous annexation to the West Valley Vector Control District or form a new vector control district. 3. Reviewing bodies: a. Annexation to West Valley Vector Control Dist rice - r.esolution by City Council, LAFCO review, adoption by district board. • Mr. Rick Gomez Page 2 May 7, 1985 • b. City assessment zone - resolution and adoption by City Council. c. New vector district - resolution by City Council, resolution by County Board of Supervisors, LA FCo review, formation by Board of Supervisors. Also, I have attached a few articles on our fly control project in Yucaipa. A similar project could be considered for Rancho Cucamonga. The Yucaipa project is funded through use of County General Fund and CDBG funding. (There have been preliminary discussions toward funding all increased vector control activ- ities in the County via vector control district - special assessments.) In the interim, the City may choose to contract wi*.h the County for direct services (similar to our department's contract with the City of Ontario for rodent control). Environmental Health Services would be glad to assist in further exploration of alternatives as well as assist with the particular course of action the City may choose, Also, be advi.s ed that in the interim, Environmental Health Services cuill continue our inspection program of commercial pouirry rancnes. Ettective July 1, the inspection fees will • be increased for these ranches and Lhe number of inspections will be increased from 2 to 3 per year. Although we receive over 2,000 such constituent complaints a year and can~~ot per- sonally visit all, we would appreciate your forwarding locations of any such reports to us as we can use the data to schedule ranch inspections. If we may be of further assistance, please call me at 714/383-3853. S' cere y yo rs, Ke neth Jeske, R.S, Division Chief K Ld:gd Enclosures • c yn_ -un•,~m°~:n-'^'~v ~N^a~q'^c of /~ 'sn $_o ~°m ~._ _ Ana ' v ^ ?~ = ~=.ir- a. ~ A a ~ 'n ....'~.,' .. m ~ ^: `G -, inn .'., u o '.°_.q ^~ J ,~ •• n N Y ,~ J a_ X 0 1 ~ O V y a 7 o n 7 `G .^ -. 6._. un ~,~~ ~'°'}~'a'°.a?^ y,^n ova, nr+a'~n mtN n~^ ~ A >- ~d c:„ a ac a ,+<3 d ^a ~~ a..a „~ ., - ~ 9 v ~ - - ~ ^ -•' ~ u ~ a 'm ° m= .m ,ao ^ ~u ^nd ='~ ~o-z ~" a°n;d v'-m°a°_°^'0 n~~ ~ !~f d'' ^ o a ;tea .°,4d ~ Q~rv ~ o -' a $.J^_-•d ~~ s f c_ 3- - o ~~ ''n3 Evi ?~.If .`c ~c Ff° ~u icc 6n v G4 m r r J 6 O fay - b O n ~ O O r O~ ~4 '.-'.C ~n$, ~ o ~u~ 103 y° '~' o,. o~'e o~, c ~ S fix- o.- ~Q ~~ >+~ >> ~F N ~~t R C 6i~`C r. Aa fi~ G41 ~ vG 5-ai O f 0 O N y n m n c N J O 3 m F N :d d .. ' • ;o~a'v~ a"ate ..~ _^ tin ~Fy~ °n 33 ~; oc °~ _' Pi' -: _ 'e ~~°3 ""-~ _: E_ e'c ~1~; ~• _G3d 5 Aa°..S •~- = C3 ~..= v.~ .goo '~'F°Ei ndin AE °G:. ~~z s„ ~ .=; E ~ _ ~3a. -s.R9 _ C} ='-:go= ~~pp - S ..~_ s X25' ___= i~ ___ _~ ~'~.~~ ~ n z„ ^~6c5 4V ~a~tE~ p~~} ,A >a~pgF~s a e.., of ~~: 'ce 4. 6e~ m .. F~ a8x~~ ~ ~~~y~ Cm .On d o iu~ ~ O ~ a~b ' ~~~ ~~4F E-r'6~ ~~ l~ sj?~ _'`3'e ~'T°- ~5,`'~~ 3~_ 'n ~~' ~'~ -~ ~^ ,~ - n ~'~ .'9~~; - ..~.; 1 ~i~f cJ'~i ~ .. y ~ - r ~. G~ .,., ~ 1 .: ~ V r b eJ Cr„ , . ~; f. ag`~ ss ~, ~ u~'y~~~hW a ~j F~ W '.~: xk'-ri p~yy ~~. l'~.~a ~~c.t'ri ~' ~^ +•/` '~3C .x~4j -~~g8 .. ... s ' t .. ', ... ~T.ti ?~`~m ~a6"s ~>~ N•H E Qae Vo E°F K'Sna°~63~ .- a~~'~d$RAG~s' (~11'~'C 'e'6~f3t`'Eg ^ `V! '~. ^~~xG ^ ~_ E ~c, ~,~:_g~c• ~ T 54.€~ 6$ aav ~~I .Y 3 ~. 7 .~..,.~Na'.i" p..,T ~:~ i 1 1 i i 1 • 'E'~~.AG C:S~ a?=,'-e -` e~~~~. ~^_•.L =~i-y -~r '~J~= ~'~j V~_p~7: -.fie: e Ei~_~~~c ~'-`63~~~ p~v `:7.. ts'f" ~=FE cr _ 3--~59''C`c~iE ~: i.3i 'L~a_'°t~x'e.5_a_-'~$ ~ G i~Z '. 3f s~:.:~ _ dvsG3'v F~ a~' _ -~ _ ? ZcF 5s5ip: ~yE_' S~ ~~~ _`-~_°T s~ _ =En.~Cn3 x"35 A~ ~ i'1 CYn via '• :Q: :~" g 5 'e..x c. ~_ g~S ~7e _ :i FE= ais ?'~`5°s£i y~c E~4 -E3;: 3c as ~_ ~ .fir ~3~=..G~~i_`? _ GE .: .":. .., ova ", E~,- ?E''.s ~_ _ s3'=~~~€ C, '~'~' A'~~PV~? o ~~e5x e ~g~eao oso' 3~^?s _- ~~ __ _ __ _ = SE'_ .ir: _- ,r. "_ x ~ - 1_ - ' - \V :i €'"ri a N:. -'~ i s"-_!IE :_' -e ~ i ^ y'-y .S _ 0 G° 5 C 3 _i L_ ^~ ~. _ _= ~ ~ 62Z's:=. .;+.'I :I l' ~ ti , 1, _f •' I' J r_ ~_ .. '.r<'~ o~__ q. J. Blnxer, 9, a fvunh grader at Callmw Elementary School. translorma a pl»tlc mIIX carton Into •IIy Trap. AI rlgnl, .leteph gsnbaxer of tha San Bernardino County Environmental Nealth slan pntlos er Bee PnBe Servlcea, shows Paula Relent 9, and Kxl Culherell. 10, hew to bails a bathe trap. They are mtmbers of Ted Rlmball's lourth ¢rsda cbee al 611mev EI<menlary. Yucaipa abuzz with swat squad activity • By BOB PflgRE Preis{Merprlu Sltll WrPer VCCAIpA - Senior dbxertc and rhacl children Aere nr< paNapuling 1n a "Swat Your Fanma" program. TnC nrov{em, op¢ralCd Dy Ibe San INr~ nadlDO Cnunly Depanmenl of [mnonmenlal Ileallh Servlctt does not Promote painful Erc(IDllne In IAe [IarolWm. PalneC d Is en attain Dl In Hap nwny Ina nM,oxmus Fannla f, cul:vls, aim xnoxn ns Inc InSer M1ouscfl)'. n "Tney Rel 011 o`'er n1e. I Jon'1 hxe 'rm:' Slid Py'ear~old Ree1n Dp'sdale of Yuralpa. "TACy Dua all around me xhen I'm doing my homework. 0.ACn I'm mnmcR IheY h11 me" 11 IacKls held Vdrk mfrlc, the Inur hnUR'0)' wOUIJ 5L f 1n II,e ma: alllnn Tnf 1116 fir non fl), nrv:cr sefminR to need to land for SI. Tney nm'ar In (IOUCs In Inc sbnde O( ~ rlbrcu6 entlrwoodwprMln ylnR Ina pence Of p Drnlcrts. Tney ep not nee. Tnrlr n nemR Preunre Is enough to mise one's( ie. °I nnl'e n ar n n1r5 ~, nad.'• vain protect volumeer rEllwmd MrreH. Td, xno united hnm Matlrnn In 5'uro1Pa IV n mmM1. ago. "Tnfy ore not Ilke mRUmr files. TLf) Ia51 irc•m, Tney Ike Ia RCI under Ina ry 11a and 1n Inf no¢u. Yna cn chv~: Infm Inr n xfek and may never land 1 d.'. n'I Annw xn^n lM1ev n5!: Tne 1¢svr hnuvlly beRlns Mlfnlnq In Ih0 rvnll <OnlmOnnY JCf1nR IhP fPrlnR. ICU[h~ InR oft ramDlnm6 m Count/ nlh(1014, M1nrJ treunga mworn rmrxen mmner.. Imo nelgm DnrAmd Crpumenl5 mar Rmsi rllpDings, IIIIM1y Inxih rnnc and eel drnpPinRS, breeding areas for the tly. In an nll¢mpi IO Ifmpfr In¢ annual fOA~ I rOV¢rry, (punly penlln alllCl015 are x'orMlnR to rMutt Ina swarm. RludCnb In Ina Yvcnlpa /nlnt Un111M Scnlwl Uuln(1 Aave made mart Inon 1,000 By baps. Senior <Illxen volunlren hunt for plans where Oleo breed and plea ex'ay lne xlvdeAls' fly (raps Tne Seven Up Bo1t11nR Co. In Son Bemardlno donated 2,000 platllC bolll0 for Vaq. County Inipttlors •.,~ nan.~nn i,n rr. n,r 1+snrrlnn~ nl ral~trn re9Cnes ID mnke sure fowl aroppln$ are nnl Inc source of brttdlnR for Oles. IDe InSDCCIars soon x'111 Degln Cn(ordnR a law, pawed 1n December. IAOt OroMDlls harMnnR breedlnR 1116 In such plac6 ns Dllri OI M1oru m nurP, Rra,K CIIDDIngS Cnd mIIInR. IaIICa Irtilt DMDIe xpn dC not cl¢Cn up mfsry nrcaa x'ncre ^1¢s brcM rouW he Bled and hneC uD Ip dbpd. TDe 1116 are parllcalerly nary to x111 be<auK Iney mrch'land 1n Ina evens mere Tney Aover. maF1nR D611[Id< sprays ineffeo In'e. Hut (nere Is •omelning Ihal wdl bong Them Cul nl lne av long enough tar a toile al Ihx<Iltlde beer. Tfd RImlAlll, n ICUnA~gmde Icxcncr CI GLimes I lemenlm) S<Annl. sold 1116 are n batl 1n the unool's AaILS mot ne nos to keep N4 JOOri cool, x'M11rn IS ICURA On AOI day's nfcall5f Ihn. CIdKfCl111t5 da aol Amf all <nndl~ IIOnInR. "There ore Mmes w'e lucd to tell Nids not yawn m rlncc;' slid Ilnx'erd Hrnver, me prPCID,l10I RICwood Cvnyon SCnC0 x'n0 x'1L5 grv'CO IAC dl lrlCl nrulRnmenl In oversee IAe ranslmdlnn nl Ay Irn Ds. S[nrol fhlldrrn'4 ^)' Irnpc mrt.151 PI ras~ nr emll6 x'Iln srrCenem'ered raenln~ on Inev ernes Tne qudrnlx use al'urs w rut 'indnxs m inr pla.b ,InU Ihrn R've vrt`en5 •ff IM1° nprn,ngi !'nIInIV MnIkCR, w'Iln M1rID froth a nmm~ anlunkers. x e HIVIOR any I,e pc Imo n xlmple patio mrlne pnlP rld9 Golden M',dr1n. P.Cfr l( poured lnlo 111e bottom nl Inf bottle and pesllClde L sDr]nMled onto Ina artcfn Flla Ihlnly Inr free OlcOnol Innd on IAe pesllClde+'Daled screen ono, usually, die. "The Imps x111 x111 (116 end rMuce IAe problem a'nunU nn Indlvldual'x home;' sold Jose DA A`nbokeL county envtronmen0l Aeo11A spefI01K1 woo & cmrdlnollnp IAe "Swat y'oUr Fannin" ptolfd. "Tne OnIY weY to calve IAe emblem In Ina loop run La gelling rid ul IM1C breCdlnR nCUrt6. p¢oplC aR vD (Or IL II's a IwR5lnntllnR DroDlcm:' CTlfken rnn<hen usvnlly recelre Inc ....,,~ ..r /,,...Inn nv ante.. a,.r ama.y,,. estlmalyd Ihelr Dlles of thichm menam art r6poI61M1le only for 50 Dercrnl tI Ina By prcelem 11e wld rr_lUenls ere re5portilole 10r Ina alAer natl. Ile Vla mothers Imre Deev (mDfnllrv'c xlln Cnunl)' requlrtmen6 for IrrallnR Inelr x'>qe aaU are AappY x'ph "Sxq[ Your Fenni~' Dam ¢ 11 tlemolaalmla resh Jfnls aim are recpowble for Ina (Iles. TAC IIy problem IS prllllCUlarlu' Dad In lne ea DemucC moede home Mukv, Idled whlh people v o Ilalr (has. border places where M1 r116 IrOdlllon,llly can tre found cnlcxrn ranrnfti anU IarRe rf5ldfnbpl lots x'Iln Ilve- F10Ck, orrllnrtl5 and 4egelaDle gardens. Tnf flln llxe nm' xmm. derd)'InR mallet Im brerUing. TM1ry Ilnmh In Ina rpnng and Iwlnfr people until may ore Nnuf NeU out of Ina ~Ny ny me nfat 1n me mldnle m summer. N Aen Ina fasler~lo~Flll common nnueOY Oe- Rins buulne. Ply ¢' cans alter Narm Nlnmrs are evpeflelly' baU fpld x'Inler moolns mean (ewer Ox`s 1n me spnnR. TM1C rnunly rharls wlnlm lempemlurCa and Iccaea annu:a IIy lorttmis. AshWNec +rN1rt' IDe 1116 x111 not be loo bad lhls year b(Yauv<` n( roIJ weolhcr during 1ne pa`I few menthe Ito Inlnhs Inv Ills will De nut In (ulf Inrre IlarlnR IAC hul Iwo wcek5 Of Apnl, Nhbn Art ¢ w'llllnR Ia Speak spout Ores to any Yunlmu Rrnup Innl will IBIen Ne h fI:IIInR mnnnC home pdrhti anU ICIx1ng la uAm,l rnlldrcn He no%5 r61JmL[ Ot Ina a x'111 Dulld Ine1r own IIy Imps. I"TM1¢ MR pnn A n 1s Innl wf arc draxing the auenonn M Ina pueue mIn¢ nronleln:'ne. wld, "II 15 n scrwu5 moblem II ReB people mad." tie aam mm me nr crty wawa x drtan. rally reUUred If everyone used a trap, but, S1re4txl Ihal xPPmnR )'ardt flflla S IM1e be51. way to nJ Yumlpn nl Ib 016, IOlormallOn nD0u1 "SNat Your Fpnnlo,' bulltllnq baps and rttflvlnR Ina Imps is Ovpllabl¢ D)' ralllnR IAe county UePanmml of Em'Imnmenwl Ilenlln Servlrcs, 1]IU ]gJ- I811 tmpc should ne xepl nut of Ina rm(h of children and pCla necaux of Ihelr pesllCde The Ress~Enterpnse MMkT. a>n 1. 1085 93 /i/Ia./o2 q,v7 MbnT3E~25 0.~ 7Nf ~uive,C, !~ ~fR~i I~ONRL~ ~r(. lA-NN21~ ~ ~ie0vl7J~ ~~ K-b95e.vga~~ // ~~~»/A~er~J /CC~vC2f~95£S ~4S ~Rnvrn~a ~oK C`gG,~~z.~,n ~µcv, d"u!'iF/ /NEreE.gSbS ffgv£ ~7PLE.v,P,N/~7E~ 73f~ r1A£,v,3ee~s /}^3,L,r~ ~ "~E jo7A~ K-E~~+'~'~~S £7 ~2 ~~ 19CTuaL ~~ /t1ECf55A~21 ,C}CPEn/SES ~~ DF ~£ DLCiCE. ~puv£/JE,Q/ J9 DNE ~N7i 2E7~ ~EeCcfv~ INC~'EA SE ~VJO/.1N%'NG U R ~ ~~, DDc~ / NC.e£A s E /N ~fv~v N~ L CXPENSE G(>OUG?~ ~nn~ ~ L/N //~°£CFiv~~j y7%dF ~ji fl CiTy ~pc~NC~[ O.~ IrH~G//fq vyGA/U/ONG~1. TN rNy ~XGE•2/ENC~"i il-fE ~N~~ ~rG,4,~~ ,~ ~voi-l ~.v~ ~/t~(NNTG,e ~BUf /z~ /TS ~,ediC.ES, /~,v /Ng,eE~9sc 7J ~E ~u"a6~ T o,C ~ ~S,~oo ~t7a~L~ moo- ~ ~~l~i ~/~ // v ~~ (~NE~+4G ,l~ir3 ~~ C' ~ i~ SJ,/A~„sG?~ i V0! ~~, ~yidf..~ ~E.QiOti 5 ~NS~~E2 i¢TioN ,q -T 'Th5 %%~~'~o Tom" jJ/E I~EG~S/oN (i(Jb,e ~ ~o' ~vTNUe~ j o -~!E ALL oF' / ~ l6~ r ~E~~fd£ Y/l~ ~~ c.s.o~ (tipv, Cam "~E C~V/OciS. `~~Ey/ rj EVENS /Efrs~ P.rss o,~ miry ,rfao(o~.ss l~,e ll~r- 5 %~En~ r ~E ~~ ON G %~ ~S ,n~ E S S ~ iTS v~E 7a ~y.,C ('rwyti s+-~.,,- ~T2 f/Av,.vG- T~D.S FN i-o /Uti,2 s a ' ~c% r~ x ~~v/LS /~JJ'l-i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, RICP, Community Development Director C~CA.4/ph >?/ 3 C' 'C ~Y =~ ~.J -.I Y'T ~ On late Friday, the 12th of April, the City was contacted by Mr. John Goodman, of Lewis Homes, with an urgent request that the City Council consider the adoption of a Cooperative Agreement with the County of San Bernardino in order to carry out a multi-family bond program. Due to the late d_te, Staff was not able to develop the information until Monday. Because of the urgency expressed by bath the County and Lewis Homes of this matter, this item is planned to be added to the City Council Agenda under City Manager's Reports for your cor~sideratior~. A representative from Lewis Homes will be present at the meeting. Respectfully submitted, ,. ....,=„~~J Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL:LD:cv ---- ~- --~ .......................... c~_~~o~, STAFF REPORT t~~ ~~ x / i I DATE: April 17, 1985 i~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council I FROM: Jack Lam, AI CP, Community Development Director BY: Linda 0. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR DING FOR A MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING MORTGAGE FINANCE PROGRAM In the past, the City Council has entered into various Cooperative Agreements with the County of San Bernardino for the implementation of the Multi-Family rental housing mortgage finance program. The most recent agreement was for the Calmark Development project located north of Base ! i.^.e Read and west of Archibald Avenue. In the past the City Council has chosen to enter into cooperative agreements with the County due to the low level of developer interest as well as the complexities involved in a multi-family bond issuance. Since January 1985, developer interest in the multi-family program has significantly increased. A total of 11 applications have been filed wiht the County since the beginning of 1985 and are identified below: Lee Jay Development 8th St. and Grove Ave. 248 units C atwill Corporation SWC Arrow and Turner 150 units Western Properties Terra Vista Planned Comm. (9 applications have been made which total over $100 million in bond requests) In addition, the City has received interest. from five (5) developers which are listed below: TAC Development The William Lyon Company Lan Bentsen Chris Gerald (project not submitted) Dan Palmer (project not submitted) Due to the increased interest in the multi-family bond program, Staff had Dl anned to brino the matter to the Citv Council for discussion and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT April 17, 1981 Cooperative Agreement Page f2 guidance at their meetine of Mav 1 le8i in terms of locations of projects and the involvement of the County and/or City in future multi- family bond programs. Lewis Homes, however, contacted the City late Friday, the 12th of April, and requested that a cooperative agreement betxeen the City and County be approved in order to avoid a recent IRS ruling which could affect the tax exempt status of a proposed Bond Issue. Briefly, the IRS ruling, which was made less than two weeks ago, states that any Bond Program which uses a Letter of Credit issued 6y a federally guaranteed bank for the credit enhancement is a taxable issue. The IRS is allowing an issue to retain its tax-exempt status and still use an FDIC Letter of Credit for an Issue's credit enhancement provided the Issue closes by May 1, 1985. Lewis Homes has historically used a federally guaranteed bank to issue its Letters of Credit. In this particular case, therefore, Lewis Homes participation in the multi-family bond program would affect the tax- exempt status of the Issue. For this reason, both the County and Lewis Homes have expressed the urgent need for the City Council to favorably consider execution of a Cocperative Agreement. The attached Cooperative Agreement is specifically far Western Properties, one of the Lewis Homes' wholly owned entities, which has made application to the County of San Bernardino to participate in a multi-family rental housing mortgage finance program. Western Properties is proposing to develop two sites in the Terra Vista Planned Community as multi-family apartment units. One site is located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue. The second site is located near the northeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. As identified before, in order for Western Properties to participate with the County of San Bernardino it is necessary for both the City and County to adopt a Cooperative Agreement. Under the Cooperative Agreement the City still retains the authority for approval of such items as land use and planning matters, and building plan check and permit issuance. In addition, the Cooperative Agreement applies only to the two projects specified and does not allow the County to initiate a separate multi-family rental housing mortgage finance program for other projects without first receiving City approval. The proposed band program involves four (4) projects, all of which are within the County of San Bernardino and proposed to be developed by Western Properties. The entire issue is expected to be about E41,000,000. The two projects located in the City will comprise approximately 828,000,000 of the total issue amount. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT April 17, 1985 Cooperative Agreement Page =3 The project located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue, Tentative Tract 12672, consists of 126 apartment units. The second project, Tentative Tract 12673, is proposed to have 402 apartment units. As part of the State multi-family bond structure, it is a requirement that not less than 20Y. of the units be made available Lo families of low and moderate incomes. Thus, in TT 12672, there would he approximately 25 units and in TT 12673 there would be approximately 80 units reserved for families of low and moderate incomes. Bath developments have had project plans approved by the Planning Commission. The City Attorney has had the opportunity to review the attached Cooperative Agreement and Resolution and has found them to he acceptable as to content and form. Should the City Council determine that to implement the proposed multi-family program on behalf of the City of Rancho attached Resolution would be in order. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ Jac Lam,A ICP ~~' Community Development Director JL:LD:cv it is appropriate for the County rental housing mortgage finance Cucamonga, then adoption of the Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" - Cooperative Agreement Locational Maps RESOLUTION N0. P-4-17-5-R ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING FINANCE MORTGAGE PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO WHEREAS, there is a shortage in the County of San Bernardino (the "County"), the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), of decent, safe, and sanitary rental housing, particularly of housing affordable 6y persons in the lower end of the income spectrum, and a consequent need to encourage the construction of rental housing affordable by such persons and otherwise to increase the rental housing supply in the County and in the City for such persons; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County has declared its intent to adopt a multifamily rental housing mortgage finance program (the "Program") pursuant to Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act") and to issue bonds pursuant to the Act to provide funds for the Program; and WHEREAS, this Council finds and determines that it is in the hest interest of the City to adopt the Program and to consent to the operation of the Program by the County within the geographic boundaries of the City pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, this Council finds and determines that the Program complies with the Land Use Element and the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. NOW, THEREFOR[, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. This City Council does hereby find and declare that the above recitals are true and correct. 2. The City hereby adopts the Program for the purpose of increasing the rental housing supply in the County and in the City and consents to the operation of the Program by the County with respect to project site (as defined in the Cooperative Agreement hereinafter mentioned) located within the geographical boundaries of the City. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION April 17, 1985 Page i~2 3. The Cooperative Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1985, between the County and the City (the "Agreement"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver said Agreement, for and in the name of and on behalf of the City. The tlayor, with the advice and consent of the City Attorney, is authorized to approve any additions to or changes in the form of said Agreement which they deem necessary or advisable, their approval of such additions or changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution by the Mayor of said Agreement as so added to or changed. The Mayor, with the advice and consent of the City Attorney, is further authorized to enter into such additional agreements with the County, execute such other documents and take such other actions as they may deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of the Agreement or to cooperate in the implementatior, of the Program. 4. This resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of April, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikel s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of April, 1985. E~?cuted this 17th day of April, 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet, ity Clerk EXHIBIT "A" COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN 6ERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (this "Cooperative Agreement") is hereby made and entered into as of April 1, 1985 by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a legal subdivision and body corporate and politic of the State of California (the "County", and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation located in the County (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the County has determined to engage in a multi-family rental housing mortgage finance program (the "Program") pursuant to Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Cali'orn is ~~~,, "Act"' ._ ~._ , •~~~ ~ w m66Gc vviii ti ut i'i un ur mur igage IOanS TOr Lne development of a multi-family rental housing project in the County, all as provided for in the Act; and WHEREAS, the County has determined to borrow money to finance the Program by the issuance of revenue bonds (the "Roods") as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to cooperate with the County pursuant to its implementation of the Program within the corporate boundaries of the City, provided that; (1) such cooperation and implementation shall in no way limit the City's ability to exercise its owner powers and develop its own similar program on other sites; and (2) the City shall retain all normal planning and building approval processes and authority over the County Program within the City's corporate limits; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter provided, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. The words and phrases of this Cooperative Agreement shall, for all purposes hereof unless other defined herein, have the meaning assigned to such words and phrases in the Act. SECTION 2. The County agrees to use its best efforts to undertake the Program and to issue the bonds therefore as soon as the County determines the same to be necessary and advisable. SECTION 3. The City represents that: (I) the City has heretofore adopted a General Plan for the City which it believes to be in conformance with the provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law of the State of California (Government Code Section 65000 et, seq.); (II) said General Plan includes a Land Use Element and a Housing Element as required by Government Code Section 65302; and (III) the Program and Program Site do comply with said Land Use Element and Housing Element. SECTION 4. The City agrees that the County may make amulti-family rental housing mortgage under the Program, and that the County may exercise any and all of the City's powers for the purpose of financing amulti-family rental housing mortgage pursuant to the Act with respect to prof ects located near (1) the intersection of the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue and (2) near the northeast corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street to be developed by Western Properties and with the preliminary name of Western Properties II. SECTION 5. The City agrees to undertake such further proceedings or actions as may be necessary in order to carry out the terms and the intent of this Cooperative Agreement; and the City further agrees to refrain from taking any aciion, which wou id, to its knowledge, tend to adversely affect the rating on the Bonds to be issued by the County pursuant hereto; provided that nothing in this Cooperative Agreement shall in any way or manner be construed to restrain, or in any way limit, the exercise by the City of its Planning, Land Use, Building Permit, or other authority, over any aspect of the Program herein proposed. SECTION 6. Nothing in this Cooperative Agreement shall prevent the County or the City from entering into one or more agreements with other political subdivisions within their respective boundaries, if deemed necessary and advisable to do so by the County or the City, nor shall anything in this Cooperative Agreement be construed as limiting the exercise by the County or the City of any of their respective applicable powers or authorities. SECTION 7. This Cooperative Agreement may be amended by one or more supplemental agreements executed by the County and the City at any time, except that no such amendment or supplement shall be made which shall adversely affect the rights of the holders of the Bonds issued by the County in connection with the Program. SECTION 8. The term of this Cooperative Agreement shall commence on the date first above written and terminate at the end of the origination period for mortgage loans under the loan for the Program. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Cooperative Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized, and their Official Seals to be hereto affixed, all as of the date first above written. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS By: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: By: Deputy County Counsel C[TY OF By: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: By: City Attorney .__. ____..._... _ O .. _- i ~__.~ .~~ ~`~` ~" 8 . ~---- ~ 3 ~~ ~ I ~ ~ IA 'I ~" ~ ~~ o ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~\~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~l I ~ _ ~ L ~~ i O ~ ~ j ~ 2 '~ ~../ nr O _ r - rs. m ~ ^I ~~ \v 3 /~ r ~ ` ~ I I lr ~ ~ ~ !~ I ~i iI _---~- o ~I I~ ' 3 '\ / .9 / ~ j i !O ~` ~~- ~~~ _,_,~ r r - ,.~~ \ m ~ ~ ~~~ 3 ~~r ~~,~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ II ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ I ~; jn ~\ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~I tip n ~ .. -- ~~ ~ --^ ~~ L _ _1 ~ ~ r s I ~ I n ~o I ~ ~ ~ _ ,N it `-~J ----- --'L-_..__. ._. .---- --- ~- ! 8 --~ __.._ ~ ~II-rnM:n srrn nvc.. III 11 .I. ~ I I C `' . ~lirr II ~~~ ~ - `- J i`r --a ~ _ _ ~ ...C W ^~ \ 2 ~ ~ 4 Z e M ~ j' At. /i / Y 0 ~i i ~ `\ p444='`4 =~ ~~ I'L ~C ~ ~ '` -'iii ~'= e - F ,' _ Z E, ''~-\\ ~ ~ . .~~ w ~,~ a 01 - r S i 1: f I k i _. .3i ~~:: ~y - CITY OI' RAl~CHO CUCAMO\GA PLANNING DIVISION 1, rn;\L TITLE: ~?:~.~ %-~' f't~' IiSIi1DIT ~ SCALe'- °- SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES MAP TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12672 c arv es xnxoio cucnvoxcn coexrv or snx xcxanxomo, s nrz or uuvoxxu -o, ____n a~x~~. ~ i v ___~ L / ~\ ', % ~ ~ ~. 1 •nPMW T \ bury 1 \ / ~ J r "U t yy' T L `_ J /,/~~~~ /: i ~~~~~ X61; ~ i -1 I \\ Lw V I ~' ~-~ ,F ~+ea-~,-..r ~~ f V ~ ~. I \\ .•. .. ... .~....~ ~ WaYivi.lfx -'view ' eF:VC~ ~' ~ -ve:, ~y, ~z,~: ~ ~ ~. .. ~~ -- G~ (\'ORTH CITY Or ~T[:,~I: -TTio~67a RA1~CH0 CUCAMO\GA TITLE: ~'f~,~/N~~~IOIV ~4 urY//IPAI. Firms PLANNING DIVLSIO;~I EXIiI[3IT-1.~__SCALG-_.~. ~otal~fonaJ Map ~vhcwrn~ Pro~rct' lara.!'ron~ c~ ~, 6 subnufhrt~ mul+,'-~~~y rnl~resfG~~/, (2~o~ects have noh bcen suCmiHrQ ~(or Yeviuu by G~ as ~ - C~alct +~ fhlm¢-") VICI6VI~i'1( NIAP CRY OF itN~CNO CUCAMONCq ~~. .. t ~O A ~7 /.IJ~ ill/!1 \~~~~ ~ "~A'. ~~~. dll...::. 4` ~„ 2 N~j ' ~ • ~ O ~ i w .... ,.~.~...._ I r yi __ ~.~ ~` w ~ >~_ -- ~- ~. k r7 `, ~: ~~~j~_ _ ~ c °4~ O `y~~ ' ~ f~%~i.IL~s.7LJ~ TT ~~~^4. it ~M{NM~ MYn wlv~ wN. A ~s www~ ~M.! •wr~. N11~1w.•RV i va~:s~a~rL~ _ ~ ~ ~ ,. Y~ ~~~c~~o c~~c~~~o~c~~ ~~~~~ pd~~~i ~ C~L°3Co ~'I ~~~I~P Xe.NFy pYnl f.f..IM1 i. A.ondrnl ~P^^ ^~.^P fmdlle~-P.ep. ale .ekflbn wN. pd my of ryrtbmry •a'gdK enNrwrn.nl~OV. gefiul mi. M irq~MM^I. irvFxhi . WA eAvalN nd h.InrE ' 4!m Me, • Icon amen ul. YVl. m. IHe~AyLannnvnny. . M..m M.mea arv ..P.H.n<a m eA.ln. • MIiw AJ,vlru[I.N ml.m. in pbf.. • BAMW TFMIwr~n9 .ryM..N mmHOrW roh N~ ~M Ilan~~ dml emwc. MmE veml..n ..prim.4 TgJ..ucnulul M~Ie~nCan,bn wry ~M. .M1en ktu.e plml ermYA - The rylYno cr<.oe. WM MI.. Mnbp EN%OVEPS - GLYERAL DYNAMICS HLtlNpIMf. COPPORATON 1'IC 0-SAVE CORP COCA COLA POTTLING CO LOOUYF.AR PUMEP CO SI PHACOI E, IYC IYSPINON OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA iIIHAI Of nNERICA AMFRON STEEL ANTI WIPE WHFAi MOTOR COMPANY ipflff.T SiORFS NE<iiHV iPrtO UV N2RV rviFRNATONAI. UIFTRIBIfiIOY CF.,YiEfl NA110NAL CAN COPP SPECIALT'MATEg1AL5 gFLOI5C0 SAFFTRAN SYSTEMS COHP GfNEPAL MAflPLE CORP NgSTER RUII OfflS DI\9510N OF DATA UFSIGNIAPS ROYAL SEAISCORP N4Pi1N HARIEIIA CORP SCHI OSSER FOPGE PNEUORAUI ICS.INC HOY4l CPFATI0Y5 IIIXI\tR b'NNEgSAt INIUGI190Y RECPFATtONA1.IYC NNICONDI CTOP iFC11NOl Oflf_S. MC SCIIIVINN SALFS NEST.iYC I.YRER~MFTRO LYOI~ATfl1i5 r- ~ ~°,~~1~1G~`IC9~ c~i>yDC~:l~1k~`~I01[~9` ~q ry1o I1.alr rn( xnN, N'IR f •M.LI1FMi MV Nr~ • MNflln fr'fwY(lW.f f. n`~n ~ nr.r wnr. T0: AANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL qE: April 5, 1985 Appeal/Tract X10349 ADDENDUM TO APPEAL We further request an appeal in the matter of Tentative Tract X10349 for the following reasons: 1.) The planned homes are incompa4lble with all surrountling neighborhoods in regards to size, architecturally, facies, and comparable value. ~., We feel an indepth Environmental Impact Aeport may be necessary to study the Socio-Economic impact because Of this incompatibility and to study the safety for the community of a straight, through street as opposed to cul-de-sacs or curved streets. Aespec tf ully submitted, flesidents of ' 7000 to 8090 61ock ~ Thoroughbred Street ~_~~Q. ~.Cn,~ Alta Loma, California CIiY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA ADMINISTRaTIDN APR !7 ~ ~811~11aG1~8~8 FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES March 1985 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCR GRANT PRDGRAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA Ton D. Mikels, Mayor Charles J. Buquet II, Councilmember Richard M. Dahl, Councilmember Jeffrey King, Councilmember Peme le J. Wright, Councilmember MARCH, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section P_ age I. In[roduc [ion 1 II. Standard Porm 424 2 III. Statement of Community Objectives y A. bescription and Ase semen[ of [he Uae o£ Previous CDBG 3 Entitlement Funds B. Comprehensive Strategy /S [atement of Community 6 Objectives IV. Community Development Program A. Project Descriptions ... . ,:po V. Housing Aasis[ance Plan and Housing Ac [ion Program V1. Citizen Participation Requirements VII. Cer[ific ations ~o ovcnMO,~c9 f n ~ /. r O O F ~ z I. Introduction ~ '> 1977 _. 1. INTRODUCTION - Section $70.2 of the Consol ideted Community Development Block Gtant Regulations identifies the primary objective of the Community Deve lopme n[ Block Crant Program as "the development of viable urban communi Cies, by providing decent housing end a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income". The three-year Community Development end Nousing Plan and the one-year Community Development Program, which together comer iae the substance of Chia application, have been prepared co address this primary goal; ° The needs identified center on the major problems facing the po<keca of older deve lopme nc within the larger, rapidly growing City; - The strategy developed by the Cicy is designed to; (1) focus efforts within these target areas; (2) upgtede th¢ existing housing stock; and (3) improve inadequate and substandard public improvement a. With [his approach, the City antic ipacea meeting the goa le of [he CDBG -- program, including elimination of blighting influences, preventing the spread of blight end deterioration, end supporting the inveacme nc of public and private funds in rehabilitation. As required by federal law (Section 570.301 of [he regulations), [he - Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives was made available for public review prior [o the public hearing held March 20, 1985, at 7:30 p.m, in [he '- Lions Community Center in the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga. A[ [het time, the - City Council vi 11 consider public comment on the community objectives end ae lect some of them £or funding in 1985/86. Legal noCicee and display advertisements were pub liehed in the Daily Report on February 22, 1985, to inform citizens of the hearing end solicit their input. A deacr ip [ion of the Block Grant Program and public hearing date were also published in the spring issue of Grapevine. 1 II. SF 424 1977 er. Aw,w•I N• tf-aDil. 1 FEDERA! ASSISTANCE 1 AIYIF • "'""" t. arAra •. Nwuf tANrs N/A Tlo~ N/A L lrr[ 11FAMlIdT1011 AlILk 1 rlE f Y IOCNry, \ rtf YN• rr Y. N.IION )~ a/I[IMTIta GMN [~r . 11 tl J wY Ma iLICKO r ~ w .I W w Q Ig1111G11011 0i 1111E111 (01U lw w N~r ~ I irl ^ aoen p 1841 KTltll OY.f • LiWI IJNCKANTIN[CIFTNi !. T[DWl WKOrEN IDENTIfIG1IDN r0, • r+N~llllr City Of Rancho Cucamon a g 1. DNrIrwVNa Planning Division • f i a wlr.0. In FA. Box 807 l j 8j w rrw II j4 ~w k MIP 1, tl- Rancho Cucamonga Otr1I + San Bernardino 1~ ~ • 11'c I, rY California LYf+lra 91730 /yrJ Community Development ~ i Trr Irr INr Ottn Kr ou[il Block. Gran[ tN1.1•rl • ww.. x..l i 1. nni rwD eESallmoN or AnucAN+~f nwicr • n.E DI .rnlGNrtNEUnu1T 4WY N.t•ww•wl1 M~Nrw 1. Residential rehab loans and grants IHWrYr 1_1„•r IMYwY IrW1r 64X61. •rwuw ~ •ar IirrJrl: ?. North Town Park development I LTw, 3. North Town Street improvements (on Belmont, I-4rr 0rN r~ rrlr r 4lr1 and Eighth Streets) Acacia r....w+w .. F. , 4. Flac ing handicapped parking signs in older . FY[ or eaflauwee shopping centers I.w•w wr1r. ~~ .rl• fr..IN 61 ~ arming and Administration r w I^i G 1~ NMA 01 PaDIECT IM.Att INw N Nw. rrlr 1L afTlrTro MIr npN IL TI/L q Af?ll fONl Irlr. YI Mlr. C-iNwn. [ipr4llr RN[NIW City of Rancho Cucamonga 65,000 ~ j~~ 6Trwrr tr. wN••wrr rtr•^A IL I1101o1ID IUM0IND Iw CONGII[fL01rf palNKTi M-T1- Tr/[ a CIUNO[ 1I•• Iw ~ rrl • MT1tM1 • NAICCt I ~Ne•r OMw r~N ICMf.1: 1 ° ur ~~ L 35 35 i ~ ~ f rro , .w. ~ • ACI! r k niOJaCT aTAtT ~ 11. YrOrttr 1 wTa r.....lf r. ~ DrNAIIDN ar• •r.- a lOC•f .r IwgS ] 1 1 1 ~ YnW i r•N• rtlrlN ~- NG I[OYx1l IDExII/IGTION NYr.(M Y ~ TI Wl[D DAR TO TM w,W rt 11. YAAIfiIT OIMC , E 1WYIrTED lY `~"-'" nou•.E A4[NCr- r BS 5 31' e-85-MC-06-0556 u rTr f rL - _ .._ -___ !• ITpfIUL 11pfNCY TO rC[IYl MpY[ai INwn CYw C4N LI.161 t1. 11ENAFRl MDtD Dept. of (lousing b Crban Development, Los Angeles, CA. 90057 n rw l~j r iL • n r Ir M rr Ywrrr rN f•IIM, • 11 ,•1•IiN M EIIE EI,w1Y Mf rn Mblw .r rrntr. r.rww w 1• N• •. NwF.•• Y. r w rrwYlrr•Nllr.r r. Fr•r rrr•. r rnwlr wWr•r r rl rrrxr u. rlw. .w.r wrv TM{ Ilr r rnrl, r• .o•Ir r Nr j ^ ^ aY/YCANT, M •11ir1M1 r r 1•wrY M r Cal if ernia Assn. of Governments YI So p . earmaa r YwNw r r wN.r r w.•IrI a w rr M ^ ^ ...rrw rrr r TWTr •II m San Bernardino Assn. of Governments w • rrra ul b ese rch 4 ~_ n . TTIU wul[ Mr nlu . IlCaflrl . we 1rItD E[allrrl r1N• ...r W MrIW don D. Mikel s, If WINIIYI Ma ~nr AAUCA• Tr rW bw k AOCNLT nWt jX ' ' MlC[IYlO 11 1L OaWNItAirNK YrT O. ADWraTMl1V{ OfIKC I Sa IEpTMI ANLIGTI011 ID(NfI1IC•{TIDII ~ 1__ _ ID[NnrrwTlw 11. IGTOM TMCN r. IIIr01N0 Tr r•J M >L Yr rnCf ti i rANTINO Q • ArOr n ON Gff- IV I O.IC r •. Ilrw AD~11. K _ 0. Wtalr Cp N 1 OY ~ INIOfYA rK Yr rNlf I•. C ~I1 • YfIMf11 LD ~ K T NT NT N r G f M . w w IO wr i q -y j tx01N0 0 w Etlalra ra •. AM .aO I uaE__I_~ "' 11Ylrrai 111 ~1r. NWANM ADOfD .. rGr AO I O • M/WY w alrf A~ Q . Yllrwrf --.- ~ .r _ j , [7 Tr_f7N. r. rrr~ rf\ , • 1. YW. Ifr11• .rrl, 4t wrY wrlw. Mr ~rly~rr .w •r~ f IIDI WI r[N[1 MI Mllilw INw •~wl+r w., C4 Wr r .w lrr rNlrrrMt l 110WLIYt11CT . ~ hY~Mri ~ wl Ww J ~ INC IICfgN rA•NI nwNDNwu ruwr •:.. uo-o, NYII•C N GYA. Ir•••1 Y•r.rwt lir•rr JA-I e ~ o ~ o III. Preliminary Statement F ~ z of Community Objectives a A. DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF USE OF PREVIOUS CDBC ENTITLElO;NT FONDS 1. Fiscal Year 1982-83 In 1982-83 the City received 5360,000.00 which was allocated to the ` following programs: ° Housing Rehabilitation Program: $ 84,000.00 ° Neighborhood Center Expansion: 81,000.00 ° North Town Street Improvements: 120,000.00 - (Center and Maxine Streets) _ Contingency 17,387.00 ° Local Costa of Program Implementation 57,613.00 The City's community development objectives for 1982-83 included the following: I. To develop a program capable of eliminating and preventing slums, bligh [, and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public we lfe re [hat can aid in preaervi ng housing stock for people of low and moderate income. II. Continue City of Eorte to eliminate conditions which are detrimental to Aealch, safety, end public welfare, alleviate physical end economic distress through [he s[imu la [ion of private investment and community revitalization and improve the quality of community ae rvices. III. To expand and improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and community fec it hies and reduce Che isolation of senior citizens living within the City. The programs Eunded by the Ci [y for 1982-83 are cons is ten[ with the City's objectives. The housing rehebili Cation program directly meets [he need addrea eed in Objec[i ye I; the Nor [h Town street improvements sa ci sfy 06jec rive II; the neighborhood center expansion terries out Objective III. TAe programs ere also consistent with the brced national ob jec[ivea specif[ed in the "maximum feasible pr io city" certification. The housing rehabilitation program ie intended to improve substandard housing, thus eliminating alums and blighting influence. Per ticipation in [he program is also limited [o lower income hnuseho lda, or families wi ch ae nior citizen or handicapped persona as heads of household. The neighborhood cancer expansion is large led [o senior citiae ne in the City. The street improvements will directly benefit re aide n[e of [he North Town target area, a majority of who ae residence are lower income. 2. Piacal Yeer 1987-84 In 1983-84 the City received a total of $437,000.00 in Community Development Elock Grant funds which were allocated ea fo llowe: 3 ° Housing Rehabilitation Program $ 70,000.00 ° Neighborhood Center Expansion 297,000.00 ° Fair Housing Services 5,000.00 ° Contingency 5,000.00 ° Local Cos [s of Program Implementation 60,000.00 The City's community development objectives for 1983-84 were similar to Objet tivea I and III from 1982-83: I. To develop a program capable of eliminating and preventing slums, blight, and conditiona detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare [hat can aid in preserving housing stock Eor people of law and moderate income. 11. To expand and improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the isolation of senior citizens living within the City. The Housing Rehabilite Ciao and Neighborhood Center Expansion programs are consistent with Objet tivea I end II, respectively. The Feir goosing Services program serves to eliminate end prevent conditiona detrimental to health, safe cy and public welfare as identified in Objective I. In terms of consistency vi [h the national 'tivaximum feasible priority" objet ti vex refer [o [he discussion above regarding the 1982-83 program. In addition, the Fair Housing Services program provides mediation ae rv ices in landlord/tenant diepu[es. The resolution of such conflict bane Ei ca low and mode race income farm lies. The proj e<[ oleo provides information and eff irmative support for state and fade rel Feir Housing Laws, consistent with Section 570.601 (b) of [he regulations. 3. Fiscal Yeer 1984-85 In 1984-85 ([he current program year), Rancho Cucamonga received $467,000.00 in Community Development Block Crent funds which ae re allocated es follows: ° Hnusi ng Rehabilitation Program $ 60,000.00 ° Fair Housing Secvi<ea G,000.00 ° North Town Park Site Acquisition 150,000.00 ° North Town S[reeG Improvements Phase 150,000.00 ° North Town 8creeG Improveme n[ Planning, Phase 15,000.00 ° Contingency 15,000.00 ° Local Costs of Program Implementation 71,050.00 The adopted community development objet tivea for 1984-85 are: I, To eliminate end prevent alums and blight and conditiona detrimental to health, eafe[y, and public welfe re ahile preserving the housing stock for people of loo and moderate income. 4 I1. To provide information and effi rna[ive aupport for the Faic Nouaing laxs of the Slate and federal Bove romance, in aupport of the goal of ensuring chat all reaidenta have ac case to a decent home in a - suitable living environment. III. To provide neighborhood parka end recreation facilities in lox and moderate income neighborhoods in order to aupport rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the reaidenta. Creation of [he ee centers for community activities will improve the living enviro~en[ in the su grounding lox and moderate income neighborhoods and aupport the prevention - and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. - IV. To eliminate hazards to the public he al ch and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for houa ing rehab ilitacion -- assistance. Prioritq in [he ae improvments is being given to _ are ae who ae re aiden[e are predominantly low and moderate income and to repai re xh ich will correct health and safety hatarda, thus __ improving [he living environment. _ The Nouaing Rehab ilitacion program ie cone is tent xith the fire[ objective, Fair tlous ing Services implements the second objective, North -- Town Perk implements the third objective, sod both North Tom Street _ cmprovemen~ projec la add teas the fpuah objective, -- All of the prof ec to are wneiecent with the national objective of giving "mezimum Eeas ib le priority" to projects that benefit low end moderate income houaeho lde and/or eliminate alums and blighting Condit ions, _ Rehabilit a[ion loans and grants are available only to lower income households. TAe North Town end Southwest Cucamonga target areas in - which all of the capital improvement projects ace located have over S1S of the reaidenta in the lover income category, Nell over S1T of -- the City's 1984-85 Community Development Block Cxen[ expe ndituree will _ di rattly benefit lover income households. 5 e. COMPRERENSIpB STRATLCY (STATeMEXT OF COMNUN ITT 0&18CTIVRS) Although the exact amount of the 1985-86 gran[ is no[ known, it is estimated to be $420,000. Funding of all projects submi teed to the City for consideration in 1985-86 would cost approximately $1,600,000. The following statement of community objec[i vea and programs reflects the priorities of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga established at a public hearing held for [he purpose on Narch 20, 1985, (see Section VI). City policy regarding the CDBG program is to designate at least 51 percent of the entitlement funds each year for programs which directly benefit peraone of low and moderate income. 1. Rousing Msiatenance and Rehabilitation (existing program) - Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need co continue Ci[y efforts to improve existing housing stock the[ does not meet building or safety -- code requirements yet ie basically sound end can, with some improvement _ efforts, continue to serve the houa ing needs of the City. Substandard unite are not oonc en[rated in one area but ere scattered in small neighborhoods throughout [he City. - Objective: To eliminate end prevent alums and blight and conditions de tt imen[al to hea ltfi, safety and puDl is welfare vh ile preserving the housing stock for people of low and moderate income. This ie in direct tomplian<e vi!F. the npr innal ob iective of eliminating alums and 6ligh t. Only low and moderate income fiouaeholda ere eligible for loans or gcan[s, vhi<h is also in accord with the federal re gu laciona. P ro¢rems: The existing Rnuaing Rehabilitation Program offs re deferred loans and below-marks[ interest rate Aome loans to peraone/families of low-or-moderate income and home imp rovemen[ grants for minor proj acts to - senior citizens and disabled or fiendic apped peraone [h roughout the City. This program is managed by the San Bernard ino County Office of Community - Development through a can[rec[ with the City. Funded activities include: ° Outreach/public information; -- ° Xome improvement loans; end ° Home repair grants (senior citizen, disabled, handicapped peraone). In 1982/83, $84,000.00 of the City's Block Grant vas allot aced for this program end $20,000.00 vas expended. In 1983/84 $70,000.00 was allocated and $42,000.00 vas expended at the end of the year. In 1984/85, $60,000.00 vas allocated, and to date $40,000,00 has been expended, In addition, all of the funds from _ the 1983/84 program year have Leen expended. This increased performance is due to expanded publicity about the program put _ out by the City end to the addition of deferred loans [o the p rogrem. The need is clearly there end the funds have been expended ea thege to d. 6 2. Co~uni ty Services (existing and new programs) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need [o provide recreation facilities accessible [o persons end families of low and moderate income throughout the co®unity. Objective: To provide neighborhood parka and recreation facilities in low and moderate income ne ighborhoode in order to support rehabilitation of chose areas and in order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for to®uni[y ac tivitiea will improve the living environment in the surrounding low end moderate income neighborhoods and support [he prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, es required under [he national priorities. Programs (a) North Tovn Pmrk: development of a neighborhood park in the North Town target area. This ie a multi-year projec [. Site acquiei [ion end planning were funded in 1984-85. However, no vas ant site of et least five ac rea (the Cicy standard) was available. Therefore, the Communi [y Services Department is working on an agreement wi to the School District to develop a park on their lend adjacent to Rancho Cuc amonge Niddle School. Punda are requested [hie year to eomple to the park. (D) Other proj acts proposed but not funded were - • Southwest Cucoonga Perk; acquisition and developme n[ o£ a ne ighborhoad park in Che Southwest Cucamonga target area. Restoration of the Chaffey-Gercie douse. • gxpension of Lions Cosuni[y Center. 3. Street Improremen[s (new programs) Needs Aa ee semen[ Finding: There ie a need Eor certain publit improvements in neighborhoods rhich have been targeted for rehebi li[a[ion ae ei stance [o prevent end eliminate blight and de to rioraticn. The ae improveme n[e could reinforce private efforts and eliminate hazards to public health and safety. Objective: To eliminate heaerda to she public health end eefety and provide scree[ improvements in erase targeted for housing rehabilitation es sic [ante. Priority in these improvements ie being given to areas chose residence are predominantly low and moderate income and co repai ra which will correct health end eefety heaerda, th ue improving the living environment. These programs will further Che national goals of eliminating Blume end blight and primarily 6e nefitcing low and mode re ce income households. 7 Proerams• _ (a) North Tow Street Improvements including reconat ruction of the street end cone[ruc [ion of aorta, gutters, sidewalks, end driveway aprons on the fo hawing nubs tandard etree te: Acacia, Belmont, and Eighth. Thin area is predominantly low and - modere to income. This ie the construction work to complete the project whose planning and engineering vas funded Chia year. (b) Other programs suggested but not selected for funding re re: ' gouthres[ Cucamonga street improvement, including reconstruction of the scree[ and conacruc Lion of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveway aprons on [he following streets: Via Carrillo, Placida Cour c, Calaveras, Vinmer and Sierra Madre. The City Engineer has divided the neighborhood into three areas. The coat of improving local streets in each area ie estimated to be $250,000 or $750,000 total. 4. Public Services (new progros) Needs Asae lament Pind ins: There is a need Eor public service to rge tad a[ special groups of lover income families and ind ividaela who are not able Co function ee independent and integcal membe re of society without assistance. Objective: To provide counae ling, referral, emergency and ongoing services to chose lower income membe re of society who have special needs in order to permit them to enjoy independent living. P rograma suggested but not funded include: (a) Rolling Start provides counseling, referral, emergency response, interpre to ra, etc. to the elderly snd disabled to permit them to live independently. (b) Concerned Ci[isens for Community Improvement provides emergency and ongoing food, shelter, counseling, [reining, etc. to permit the poor end homeless to join the mainstream of society. B GAO ~~ycAMO~c~ j n ~ ~ r IV. Community 0 o Development F ~ z Program ~ a 1977 .««.,._ Vl OV.11rW Mr Or r10V.Irq YOV11.•«pa Va WrYa«\ \. «.Ya 01 •rllK•«l •rw•aorwru«nr wruwww\reooew C [ Rancho Cucamon a ]. •wLrc•no«roe•wr ruw\w MOJ[CT nm]]ket B-85-MC-06-0556 ~. Nk10od •PLK•e~UTT ~] O.NI«.l /W. • / ewor tO . ~r rW O wavnlo«, D•ne July I, 1985 dune 30, 1986 O eW«er.«\, e•no e. \r.raw reoww .JVOLC. wVWa. tewvlw«W«uuwnw].•Tm Housin Rehabilitation 1 Cate orical Exclusion e awnTV .IT«wawownnm rw ewwnw our T«uwwcT e. Tewwo«a«wuw (714) 383-3893 le DaeUw\10«w r.ORtt Continuation of a Housing Rehabilitation Program that offers below market interesC rate loans and deferred loans, Co lower income persons or families, and home improvement grants for minor repairs to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons. Activities funded include: outreach/public lnforma- tion, home improvement loans, and emergency repair grants (senior citizens and disabled only). O o«re Mae1Nw«J ew acvieoW Orll.lrq r]rean. 1\, a«ab.e.rnnn«wu..ro«on.wlcnn 20 21 a cI ~-wide o eli ible households v •waclr•nrr •ccor]n.rawTs Home Improvement loans IS each Home Repair Grants 25 each O ds]NCa\enve/en e/1'NnWwPkl e«e ertaw. 1] aeeG COrrOw1«T .C11V1T,a] MOGk•M Y/N /Y«Dl lr e,rrrN Nli Rnrwwl\sMnlw.«y rr•wN.r~ws Mr.• COe O en wM•. eOtf lwewr•M, Ir•wwW.Jaa/./ •OwIr00 MwarlT orwae e.Mrl\ •«ew«\ eeywea W M kl ka kl Outreach/public information S 5.0* ~ 0 S 0 Home improvement loans 40.0* 0 0 Home re air rants 35.0* 0 0 w TeWr S 80.0 S S : P~fet v: Ly. . IS ioW Can Te M eee Wuk Ce~nwtT pawlOOlwn1 ~ksL Grrn] er0 lSwn dCelvn\w 1 ae0 rl t 80.0 wuD row n rn 1lrelww ]rrr «11Dw1e 1. MAP eDYrr« AR K ~1 eYreliminary estimate of funds distribution; funds may be a].loca[ed in varying proportions among the Individual activities. o 0 0 0 .a 4, Cc '~ 1 \- 1 m E 1 0 C C m 3 ~ m ~ Q C C ~ O J W ~ O ~ L p~j t~ t C7 Q r ¢ W F 2~ Z;~Uy g O .- N M ~ 1D ~ ... _ i 1 . ~7FRAT ,.. , frail t-. \ In 1 __ .~_ -s i 1 1 1~N.47, i~ 1 ~'. ' ~ J _, ~ i ii W ~ t -. ~ i 1~ ~ ~ ~ 10 _~ ~^~ < ~y s ~':i~~ • .._ -,~~~~{~*11"' 9CgR1~ _ ~ Nom, r ~ -r.~ I W`~__ ~~~'T^~r~ R '~~' a Ida L,~. -1~ ~,~ ~ i ~ i! SY. r ..J9~ 1., ~ -ti - ~ ~ i ~ J.... - _-7777 _ 'i • ~ ti~ _ e 11=1 ~I~i1~70.~~ ~ .L~ i I Il 1~~1 1 _ ._ ._ _. . .. a ,~ Z~.~. I i 1 -. :;k ~1 ~~ ; ..w...._ DM. N..,.,... VI OIIwNtYl MT 0111D1ItIp MOVwf+N OIVIL.wYINf wwNwwa LOrlYNnr oavawwnrwoDw.M I.N+YI DI +MLK+Mf Cit of Rancho Cucamon a nloJ/cT/wffullr I. wrruurloNlowlNT Nuwaw B-85-MC-06-0556 7. gwwo w wwlKwtlllfr L ~ 01401N+ LWr I /wOY ,luly 1, 1985 f0 .lone 30, 1986 . L IW 0 NLVItWN. D+r10 O wWNOWNT, Mf10 w 1uYa 011wOMH LrwOACf MVYtL• North Town Park 2 f.LNVI110MW N1wL gYllw]r~r VL review completed • Iwnrr wltN wI VONLwurr lDll uwNnW OVf TwLrp/LP Cit of Rancho Cucamonga wrµo110NfNwuw (714) 989-1851 N NKwonoNw lNOwC] This is the second year of a two-year project. LasC year funds were allocated [o purchase a site for a park in the North Town area. This year, funds will be used to develop a park with a lighted ball-diamond, sand area, picnic area, etc. (see attached plan) O dlrl NawIMAOM IMlna'W wJrhl aflllJlLM1 11. LLNLNTw+L11f1ILNWL11+t10N ONtw,Cflt1 If +NIICIIItaO +000VLItwYf NTt Development of the 4.8 acre park. D C71.LIMLw6nf1/on o/M'noD/DI/I/U IIl/11JIfll. If tDt4 coWONf Nt Kbrltla• 1wDIiN+Y VttwIWD1YwYYM+I JI MNIw1w1NAYwIw IAN Nn,w MNMNNw Mw+ CM G DrNJM w til w, LOJr JVYw~w[ /INI NVO.ALI LON/NOO wtN1111 orw1+ JIINIIT +WVNT wDVllCf W 4 MI HI Ol ark develo ment /150.0 / 0 / 0 u. Twl1 /lso.o / o / 0 .: s~~L: ti41 , If ToW taw To M 11A wln Cellxlwnlry DIw1a01Nn1 /Iat Grant iYw~ ISlwl •/ CtIYNYN /+Ie11 / MrMw IaN. NUpt/1/I,rw+I~t AIMIw ~ t/ MII MoD lOY MHi Zp V ~~ z a 0 F V o 0 --T~- o -- -~. i ~~ gt~r 1 ~; ,i. Y a 3 r r Z ~~_ C. -- ~- T" ' : . ~ ~ ~ ,~, --~ - ' i ' _ • y ___ e < ~ ~ a ~ AZ ~ ~ _ ~ ~. s . ~_ ~.'S3i • iii `. ~ ''_~' +~. i t~ . ~ _'" iy - ~1''~ T~ - ~; _ .~ ~. ~~' ~ L~ '11 ~_ ~ .~'~;~ Tin A - __ ~ ~ j i__• _- µ _r Ua.4 Pi~ _ --~.._ _., _ .~ ,_; ~, -• ~~ - _ , rti ;; ~ ~ i _ ,. __ ~ ,_... A y -. . • ~ ~• 4 •T •/rte V•Ol1••t VLY1 OI Ng1•IYO MOV•r•Y O•VLLOIw+\ uwwL Cerwn+wvuww+r r•op••r r, Y•Yr OI •IrIK•Y\ City of Rancho Cucamonga M~~~^r i. •MLK•\Ipr/O11•Yf +VWI• B-85-MC-06-0556 i. nnloo w •irLKUltnr r•or July 1, 1985 ro June 30, 1986 p uvKlo+, o•vo Q •Yr+ow+r,r•Trn r. r•Yi or rower r•wwn YYw•• 3 i.•YnFO.rw+TU •ivn.•r•.w\ Cate orical exemption •,•MTIr\YIrM11{\I0Y{IIIIITt I011CMOtIw WrTM{IIgAC. C. \•LrIYO+•+VY1L11 (714) 989-1851 u wte•o\a+u r•owe\ This is the second phase of this project. Last year, design and engineering were completed. This year Acacia, Belmont, and Eighth Streets will be reconstructed, with curbs, gut [ers, sidewalks and driveway aprons. This project will continue Che effort to upgrade public improvements in this predominantly low and moderate income area. p Oxrr Neo+nr•r/M ••hYliarW Pirhlwr0•f0[A n. a+rlw rw•rnnw+w•••rro+our•wnn 1 Lr •+vcY.r•o •cmrur+Ywn Remove exiscirg subs[andazd surface (where it exists), grade and reconstruct the streets, and construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks and driveway aprons on Acacia, Belmont and Eighth Street. 0 aYe{/rtwlbvwsrntNlnr•/o»r/i/w/arsrl. u tort corrowt+. •cnraKt wloan•Y qLe runty L. w.'wn•rL a+r r.~rowr Y•FI+. n.r.n+r •lrw.u•Yw+ cow orw{• rM•. CC4r lVYYInY, /•w,+Wlgtl LOr/YOD rrw•~i O\Y{• rLMr11\ •YOVN\ rOW<l bl N kl W µ Street reconstruction t 153. t 0 t 0 p, TrWi t 153 , t 0 t 0 : PL1~'1~+~ ti.f,~~ ~~~ IS ToolCpn Tr MAW Wi~Cew•wty Di.Nrt/rrnl tMrr GKnL fI/O /frM+NG•b•N11 r+stl t 153.0 MVww r.. Yw~»n r. rs.OOrYr ~{ of MI•, Yyp Ii K ». 0 i i ~ ~ 1 J T _ W i ~ i li i . g ~ ~' L J.,~ ~ w - _y 1 7iW( ~ -- _~ ~._ = . Y ~ r1=' _ - "~.3i-.a :aa~~-. rJ~~r CIS ,:~_. . - -~y ;~ ~ ~a 3 rti t--•~~;' ~J ~•-~ _ ' ~ '~~~~ i~lj~~f1L77_~ P` ' . C i L ~ j•.~. ~~~ ~ -~,~ ~. .. -- - (: `- ~ i - ~~a.i _ .., ~._~ ~T.~ ' 1 _~! ' 1 .~ 'f d ~e ao r ~ o ~ ZN InV N3nVH i'i+, -~-- ~ _. h ., ~~ o DY. e. . V.C Ol1«w1w F• 01 «dlCl«O ««O W\«« OC VC WIYC«I wwuu corYwlllanio.wwl lwDDww I. M.w 01 YI:Kw• City of Rancho Cucamonga MpJECt ~.bT \ wwlrt•rro«q••«1 «wllr• 8-9 -MC- 556 I. KwIOD O\ wMIK.ILLRV ~- IwOY July 1, 1985 lD June 30, 1986 p w\rllwr,epm p wwwow«T. ewno I. ora el rwowq arwwa ruwp Handicapped signs 4 ].\«vlwo«w «l.uwn+\1.l Ys Categorical exemption \ CYIII. YIIn •CVOwI\11111 I0«C.••.IN DY•11N IwOJCiI w. 1CU1Yp«r «VY.1« 714 989-1851 a a\C•Illw•of I•ow<1 Older shopping centers have handicapped parking spaces designated by blue paint but they do no[ have signs which cite [he section of the municipal code reserving them for [he disabled. Without such signs, [he Sheriff's Department cannoC Cicket offenders. Property owners are reluctant to erect Che signs and [he City cannot require them Co do so. Provision of the signs would make [he spaces more visible [o disabled residents as well as per- mitting enforcement of City code provisions. p Q]C\ IYtMIN«rAM AWwWalrhl w'101ISrA n. a«\u\ 1•«rnu»•vr\w.no« on•wlnnr City-wide \] .«11CII.ICO.000M11InY\NTC Placement of 20-30 signs in shopping centers around [he City. p pYCf I/aarnlw•uo•\sa'non//.p67NMaT. I] i0\O COYIO«\«T .Cll Vlln\ /wD4w.M Yl.w IV«DlM \IWMIIII n«..~Y..,I..«I+.w,... N..nlr r«~r wo D ofwu wM•, (Qp luYYl wl, IYw YUO~M1/.l •Ow,YOD O1wP fM M kl 11l 1.1 I 5.0 I 0 S O to iwW\ f 5.0 ~ 0 f 0 ~ 4~'':'`4` l ] IS TDW Cab TIY1Ye WPM Cr••wryO.wnvwmllwo W\m lnllr fSll•NCDAmwIIM e! ~ 5.0 klwrrw+•ruo.»I\r,Iwe~.O•rr ~ I! Nnr wuo ro»N»I ~° GU~MC~c9 f n r a /. 0 o V. Housing U ~ a Assistance Plan 1977 `.+yrr y` ,, v~.~Y MAY 13 1°.83 Honorable Jon D. Mikels, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mr. Richard Marks, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Mayor Mikels: Us. a Hou.wq nw UrWn oavNOp~e Lw Ana oma. n.oton Ix 2500 Wlhnin BouWUd lca ArgWa, CWIanYa 00057 ~ITY OF F! LYO U ~q ONGq :.0~7N.pNITV fpyn prMfNT DEPT, ~4~r 15 1983 -. AN ~ 719141ID1111121112131gisi 6 Associate Planner j 91730 Subject: Community Development Block Grant Program B-83-MC-06-0556 - City of Rancho Cucamonga Approval of Housing Assistance Plan in accordance with 24 CFR 570.306 and current instructions, the Area Office has reviewed your Housing Assistance Plan for the period of October 1, 1982 through September 30, 1985. Based on our review, we find your Housing Assistance Plan to be accep- table. It is therefore approved. accomplishments toward your Housing Assistance Plan goals will be reviewed annually as reported in your Grantee Performance Reports and as a result of Area Office monitoring of your City. SincerelK, T~ i~~ ~wAirea Manager 32 ,.w UBIARTMENT OF MOUSING ANO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY OENTITLEMENT IROGRAMANT IROGRwM - ~ HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN F•OM:Ottober 1, 1982 TD: Se [enber 30, 1985 ~ •. D•rF OS u•MluloN «. 7 ~~°:Y 13 .\prll 1, 1987 Original ^Revition ^Amendmenl Fpn Nrtof AVlnaUFt OII.I IDtnl _ -ART 1 -HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS TABLE I -HOUSING STOCK CONDITIONS tTANDARD UNITS SUBSTANDARD UNITS SUBSTANDARD UNITS tUITABLEfOA REMAE TENURE TYPE DCCUFlFD VACANT OLCUFIfO VAUNT OCCU/IFO UNITS VACANT YNITf YNITS YNITB YNITi TVW LlNwr lnvuru YNITS • • C O F G i 6 Owner 131887 4 ' 7 Renter 2 597 TABLE II - RENTAL SUBSIDY NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS ELDERLY SMALL FAMILY LARGE FAMILY TOTAL N I J S • f ID Ver Low lnmmt Percent Otner lower Inmmt 4 % % 38 10.4 % 1 2 A 100% tt ETR t] To be Dia Mad tF Teul lloi t. PtrtSnt x x x toox PART 11 • THREE YEAR GOAL TABLE 1 -UNITS TO BE ASSISTED RENABIOLFTATION SU~fANDARD ~~ NEW CONSTRUCTION CONVERSION TO fTAN0AR0 UNITt NOME IMIROVEMENTS L M N O 16 Owmr 75 t6 Renter 0 (UNITS EAPECTED TO ASSIST LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDSI tT OwrNt It Renitr TABLE II -LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO RECEIVE RENTAL SUBSIDIES' ELDERLY LMAIt FAMILY URGE FAMILY TOTAL t O • f I HOYftMldl to be Auitted 16A 113 16 145 M Percent 11.0 % 77.9 % 11.0 % 100% TABLE III -GOALS FOR HUD RESOURCES: SUBJECT TO LOCAL REVIEW AND COMMENT ELDERLY iMAII FAMILY LARGE iAMILY TOTAL U V w I HOYftROldl to 6e Auintd 30 5 45 45 45 45 ~ - 33 -'~~ -ART III -GENERAL LOCATIONS .t Arcl .N mn idmrilvint rM arwnl loutiont of poJwwd tcitnd haY/rq. •O 4 '^ u i c~ ~ n noO 0 a O W ~ p p F ~> ~O a g ~J N ono.p o ~ ~ s r S< ~ !gy I ~ p 5 r ~ > w ; r O O~DOO O ~ M R • L • O ~ ~ •1\ _ ' ! . 6 V 6 Y L ~ ~ J c ~'+ n -I ~n n o p 0 N u p ~ ~ $ : Z ~ O m m W p M ~ 0 y Z Y A M N) j 0 N n I 'J A o • i ~ ~ O x v u a u v c^ ~ ~ < O W t m O C O C C X .Z • i U' m J W p O C W d r-1 n -1 N Z ^ 4 ~ Z r 1 H •_ 1 E > ~ ' •1 % H ZO +~ G ~ r Q ~ ~ x _ ~ N 'p ~ y , ~ u J u {~ F } 2 w WO ~ G N M y j a z a =4 ~ E OF 3~ ^ _ ~ N J :~ o. L° . ~ ~ ~ ~ p w ' p 6 a s o .. ~, _ Yy ZO Z # U ~ p ~ m ~ ~ cii F ¢ Z~ s E u u b ~ p yW y LL L ~' R rol mO s VJ s ~ W V C C u i S J Q wC . 9 a' ~ J a i~ ` M U M1 ¢ b N Y N H p S i ~ 1 S m ~[. a C C Y b R • G N _ I M o W y ~ ' { i p ~ • T U l' ~0 Y W i~ C ID 1 z < ~ J fdf u aJr b 6 Z S ~ ! N A A 2 i~ E d. rO U N N N m A ~ I' a Ob i p C C M R 1 tip N C F Q5 ~ t \ A p p m l 9 O 1.. d I^ m C• j M f1 .] • i y O 9 _ o t ~ ev o a e w e c c p w o i S i e w w w m p m J LL p 6 • ~ u ~ R G~ A~ > d y ~ O p . Y b M ti H p Y + ^I H4 J . > e > ~' ~a oa o c m Q % u ~ l a ~ L L L b w b p S c d d b m m O C K dt q] ~'1 a a g m m s yy C o ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ b ?~ ~ d D D O 0 0 0 • ii m U V V S u y ~~ 34 FooL~oic to Table II and Table III ~ The coal shvrs only 1G units for the elderly consistent with the pro- portion of needs and available funds. 't'his goal is too small m allo.: for a feasible senior citizen project. A goal large enough to acarrodate n feasible develop*iea~t, in order to maintain oroportiowlity b?' family tyx, would necessitate total goals which aze exirtnely unrealistic both in rela- tion to need and to available resources. Therefore, if an assisted elderly housing development is proposed, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will consider amerdinq its HAP io a .tra?ate the project and will at that titre request a waiver of proportionality requirements based on reasonable level of effort and past perforn3nce. 35 / Rancho CUCamnga Nazrative on Housinq Assistance deeds Definition of Substanclatd: Units which do rot reef local buildi:K code, which standaxte exceed the Section 8 1]~istirg housing quality starr'a-ds. Defitition of Suitable for Rehabilitation: Substandard units which aze stn:r turally sound an3 for which the cost of rehabilitation will cot exceed the lower of 809 of the renlacerest cost for 609 of the rtarket value after rehabilitation. Fxpecte3 to Feside by Coraone~t Parts: The SC'~.('. Aevia^al Housing Allocation tiodel shows a total fair shaze for Pancho Cucannnga of 336. 71ie rer- cent allocated to each fa-uly tyre is based on a distribution obtained frxm HUJ, ~;.li), for the current expected to reside for "Reminder of San Berardino Cou~t}•; which included Rancho Cucaronaa. ~ - Basis for Data: 11 1980 Census information prepared by SLAG and NUD. 2) Substandard Units Suitable for Rehab basal on percentage of total subs[andazd units estimated by local rehab, program P ~Tience. 31 Sv.:er inane occupancy of units suitable for rehab based on local rehab program e+grsience. Expected It~act of Conversion of Rental Housing to Condoniniun or Cooperative dnershio: Sorer displacement is presently occurring due to mndauniun wmersions approved prior to 1981. Annrori^ately 181 units converted out of 248 36 _ ~ on tbusing Assistance Needs (Ccnt'3.) 1 ~ approved. ,bst of the tenants roving are not fannies with children and renss on the cornerted units were rela[ivelp high. Rancho CUCa~cmga's condominium on-tinance limits conversions to m rmre than one half the number of multifamily rental dwellings addod to the housing stock during the preceding year. No additional displacement - is exnec[ed for the HAP period. 37 ~ ~J Mirority Housing Heeds Hlack Iower inmrie households in subsiardaxd hot151i1O a`"er: 8 Renter: 1 Lover inane households requiring rental subsidies E13erly 9:ui1 Fardly Lame Family 1 9 2 Inver intone households to be displaced Elderly Snap Fa:ily Large Fa^~ily 0 0 0 $'klnlsh OZ1 Rln Lower inane hUUSeiwicis in sui~stardard hcn~siny - 0.aer: 45 Renter: 13 Lower incnoe households requiring rental subsidies Elderly Snap Family Lan3e Family 12 93 24 L~aer ineQne households to be displace! Elderly S:~all Fanny Large Fanny 0 0 0 Americar. I:~dian, Alaskan Hati~~e Inwer inane households in snbstardard housing _. Owner: 3 Rentet: i LawPi innne households reciuirinq rental subsidies Elderly Sell Family Large Family 1 1 g 2 38 i ~ty Housing Needs Contd. z ~/ Ivaer locate hrnueholds to be displaced Elderly Stall Family Large Family 0 0 0 Asian or Pacific Islander Inaer i'fcctne households in substandard housing 0~.:.ez: 9 Pester: 1 Loner insane households requiring rental subsidies Elderly Sall Family large Family 1 6 1 La+er incase households to be displaced Elderly Sell Family Large Family 0 0 0 Other Minozit~ Uuwer insane households i.n substandard housing Omer: 23 .?enter: 5 ' Lower insane }nuseholds requiring rental subsidies Elderly St4111 Family Large Family 5 39 10 Icwuer insane households to be displaced Elderly Stall Family Large Family 0 0 0 Minority data basod on 1980 census minority by tenure type as a percentage o£ total housing needs. 39 ' / Special Housing deeds of Hardicaooed Perso^s / f ' / IlJIJ TNCGSE R&1 TE125 117:.u Nl}DING lSSIST:.VC --- Single Zrclividvals: )07 33 Menbers of stall Families: 912 42 Dianbers Of Iarge Families: 101 5 Estirates of handicapped persons based on California Department of Arh,ibilitation Statewide Study of Disabled, 1978. Based on this report a. estirata9 3,674 disabled persons live in Fanctfo Cucamonga. lip ever, about 1,720 of that have types of disabilities which aze likely to affect their housing needs, such as blindness, deafness, ndsculoskeletal cc:ditions, mutations, deformities, mental retardation, epilepsy, mul- tiple sclerosis, paralysis, etc. Most of the disabled aze mt in lower intone households. :he estimates of the number who aze lover incase renters is based on the incidence of lower inane renters in the Overall population. Note also that about seven percent of the disabled aze also elderly. Ten percent: of all rental units developed will be accessible tD the handicapped. __ Special Horsing Needs of Hot>seholds headed b•7 Single Irclividuals wiffi .lornrdent ctuldren According to the 1980 twnsus, there area total of 1,055 single parent fa^ulies in Rancho Cucaronga ca:,nrising 6.88 of total households. A - 1979 report by the Fair Housing Project called The Dctent arc] Effects Of Oisprimination Fwairst Children in Rental (busing shows that female - headed families aze renters 1.7 times as often as all households with _ children a:d that fenale headed loo incrnie renters with children tend to be inadequately hou_se:i about 308 nrore often than~werall loner inccrte households in California. hence, about 94 single parent households with children aze estimated to need rental assistance. About 788 of all sin- - gle parent households are female headed, and 228 are male headed, accord- ing to the 1980 census. Other Special Housing Needs None 40 /~ Cameral locations of Proposed Assisted l;ou_si^~ (SCe attamcd rup) '~u~.,'ar±da", Census Tract 20: South of 9aselinc, Bast of the Bevore ;rcewa+~, P:orth of Foothili Boulevard, and F:est of East Averi~e. Thz azea is vacant with a specific plan i.ncludine multifamily land use catagories is currently before the City Council for adootio•:. . e__a Vista", Part of Cers+ss Tract 20: East of Iaven Avenue, West of Fiiliken, South of Baseline and North of Foothill Eoulevazd. The azea is vacant land with an adopted pl=-:nc:d crnmunity which includes multifamily land uses and go31s for •:00 loM~and modera[e- irame units (Below b0i of nrdian irccx-r_.) "l'ictcria", Part of Census Tract 20: South of Highlard, Dlorth of S'FL4 tracks, Hest of Etii~arda, East of n,.. r ....r :,...... The area is a vacant _+lanred ccmauiity which inclu^'.es rniltifamily la: ~ uses and for which of fordable ttousina goals and policies aze pro~~osed. "`:o.". To~.n and "Ir'est Cuaa~ronga", Part of Census ^'ed 21: , North of Arra,~, West of Archibald and North of the Pailroad Tracts test of Haven. Infill new construction sites aze available and rehabilitation opportunities aze located in this area. All services aze developed. "C1^ ;dta Iq;.~", Part of Censts Tract 20: Yks[ of Archibald, Bast of Hellsa,~, *;orth of Baseline, South of 15th Street. Thls azea is devclo~.ni +uith so~rc ir.fill housing sites available. 41 Q V 0 V 0 x U 2 Q C LL 0 1 F V b Ql a eo FI p a m W 0 ~x mb ffiy ~, m ~^I ~z q d C7 1 ~! __ I I C N A d Y Y U ar U U ~ q p Vl A l L q L 4 d L ~ ~ A ~ Q d d ~ ~+ •~ N~ N Y U a! ty N J ° J N J L A A r U y c d m c d J {/) f..l r..l ^ O ^ o . ~~` iR ~ _ , ..... ll .._~_r-~ ~.~. ~1_ r- _v .. .I. _ ._{ I - ^ . Q^ . - 4 - ~ _ ~ i :_ _ ^ ^ 1 .~ ~ a .N t7 ~ -, N -y a : o ~, _..a_ _ ^ -~ ,~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~_ ':~Il~: (~- 1 IJ lll: iiM MilliN_ r ~ t 1~ .~ :-~3--_J. III J i ~ ,~. (A ~ . , 1, I r_.-1~_ my ~ C;=. Z 13::~; W _ - __ A - 1 -~•;, is-; ~ a, ~ 1 ~¢ ~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ :c:.. -3 NUN /~ _r I'i 1 ~ ~ :. J_•.O ~ l:: \' r t;•F: ~I71~~R ~~ p 1I' ~~ _ is 11 i-._. ^ ~ f:.•F !~:-r.:: S.: _I•_ ~r'ri, lye :. tti:. -. i"G': c1f:' 1'.J =11~•. I~~ -~~..^ r-I ~ .3. .._ _ ..1..x'11 r-~0 .rf y': J~I~J•^~N;p^ :a. ^ r_~.~; rye:'-' .^ _..~. ~~-1' : .. .~ , u.s. o.v~~ a ~au.mo.na urow, o.v.~avm.m i .h ~ Loa Angeles Nw Oulu, maggn 1% , 2500 WIISble eoulever0 1 • Los Anpeln. Callksma 90051 `t.... OtC _ 1 :~8' _., J ~V-' ~~ (Ial Q,il, ticnora6le Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Ci*y of Aahcho Cucamonga AYTE~`TICN: Mr. Richard Marks, Assoc. Planner . ... Poz A07 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dedr Mayor Mikels: SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Program N0. 8-84-NL-06-0556- City of Aancho Cucamonga Annual Nousing Assistance Ptan (HAP) Approval In accordance with 24 CFR 570.306 and current instructions, this Office has reviewed your Annual Housing Assistance Plan for the period October 1, 1983 thru September 30. 1984. Based on our review, we ftnd your Housing Assistance Plan to be acceptable and it is therefore approved. Accompiishmenis Loward your HAP goals will De reviewed annually as reported 1n your HAP Performance Reports and as a result of our monitoring of your program. ;Sincerely, Ignacio A. Galindo L`- Atting Manager LL Los Angeles Office, 9.45 43 ~ J NARRATIVE FOR THREE YEAR GOAL AND ONE YEAR GOAL Substandard residential units to be demolished as a result of direct Federal, State, or local actions: None Actions the Community will take to implement its one and three year goal: 1. Sale of Mortgage Revenue Bonds to provide below market mortgage financing for owner occupants. Most users rill be moderate incase, none expected to be low income. An issue whfch will fund an estimated 500 mortgages has been sold. The goal witl be realtted, therefore, subtect only to abrket conditions and the developers' ebility to develop and sell the homes. 2. By cooperation agreement with Lhe County of San 8ernardinu, rental protects in Rancho Cucamonga with 20 Dercent of the units restricted to low income households at rents less than 30 percent of income, may De financed with County Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Ilo expect about 500 new units will be financed to Rancho Cucamonga in this manner or by Lity/Redevelopment Agency bonds over the next three years. Developer interest is currently very strong; however, market conditions and developer performance wilt dictate whether the units committed are completed. 3. Rancho Cucamonga will allocate CDBG funds for rehabilitation taans and 'grants and for the •Senfor Repair Programs, These programs are administered by the County of San Bernardino pursuant to an agreement with the City. 44 / Narrative for Three it Goal b One Year Goal 1 Page 2 • ~.' 4. The City has entered into a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardlno for the Section 8 program. The goals can be achieved if the Housing Authority greatly Increases its efforts to solicit tenants and leases in Rancho Cucamonga, as opposed to other parts of the County where Section 8 has been more widely used in the past. The Ctty wfll assist to this "affirmative marketing" to the extent possible. 5. The voters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum allowing public ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to Article XXXIV of the State Constitution. This enables use of public housing and various multifamily financing programs. 6. The City has entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino for use of the Public Housing Program. Rlthough no new proSects have been proposed for Rancho Cucamonga, agreements are in place should funding became available. 7. Several of the Planned Communities in Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments to development of affordable housing in Lhe text of the approved or proposed Comminity Plan. The developer commits to develop a portion of units for lower income renters at monthly rents not exceeding 30 percent of gross income and the Cfty agrees to provide lncentlves and assistance where necessary and possible. 8. Rancho Cucamonga Darticipates in a Countywide Revolving Fund for land banking or other front end casts for low income family housing development, particularly public housing. 45 r ~ .•• Narrative for Three .nr Goal 6 One Year Goal Page 3 9. Twenty percent of tax increment funds from the City's redevelopment projects wilt 6e used to assist low income housing development as - necessary and as funds become available. !0. The city proposes to reduce or reimburse fees and parking requirements for senior citizen housing. 11. By State law, a 25 percent densfty bonus or funds/concessions of equal value are available to any project with at least 25 percent of the units affordable to low and moderate income households. Provisions io Assure Thai a riajoriiy of uweilina Units to Receive Rehabilitation Subsidy will Assisi lower Income Households. 1) Atl rehab loans and grants are restricted to law income homeowners. 2. Rental rehab loans are given Doty for structures fA be occupied solely Dy lower income renters and the projects are selected such that after rehab rents do not exceed 30 percent of~~tenant incomes. 46 ~, ~ 'e I V . I ti N O N 4 O :l a ~ N tl ' N V N O "~ 7 t 1 O b ~ y 1 O f jO N O f1 ~ Nl O ' o o ~ r g % : s a 1 5 ~ V > ~ ~ ~ , W j ; ; O o N O ~ b a 9 2 1 1 ^ , V _ ya ui ~ C Y r r i Q I w 3 ~ 1 2 ~ ~ ~ o ~~ O o : ^ ~ a ? y l S i O ~ A q q " _ 'a ~ t ' ~ . O W o: s z V ~ ' W O O I u ~ ~ p I~Q ~` ~ O a tl ~ % K % % i fi w ~ p o 7~ [ [ E p j ~ ppp[ p j ¢I, : _ S .[ ' : 6 `f ~ ~ E ~ ~ =_ .g ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ of kU~ i u ~ u i ~ ^ `c ~ peP 0 ~ ;~~ ision u r A .d `u i ~ ~~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ . C ~ s D O ~ __ ~ o U a F i ~ i0 l W 3 ~ ~ a ~ ;o ~~~a~ ~ , s i W ~ 7 W ~ W ~. W~ ~ I / C m NL'"~~ taam F. W N N /~ a = m t 'Y W y 0 ~ ~ A L N b b A y F ~~ ~ N C^ : :F q ~ g E O O O 1~ ~ {al g ~ ~ ~ ~ C^ c <~ ~ a o o ~ e~ ~ ~ A 2 ~ ... O J N M M V C/ C Y ~ ~ n ~ x - .~ °L i V V> ,,, r4 ~' o o `o a~ auc ~ . ~ q N A ~ M 8 \ a Y w1 ~ V / f0 ~ (G _ ~ ~ wV w U V V ~ ..{ K W 47 ~o GuCAMp~C•Y i n a ~ r O O F ~ z VI. Citizen Participation ~ '> 1977 Resolution No. w -9J Page 7 MAR 25 1995 toll u:; ;~u~, CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA RELOCATION ASSISTANCE Pq,ICY FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Recent changes in the regulations governing the eapendi LUre of Community Oeve lopment Block Grant (CDBG) funds require that the City establish a policy governing the provision of relocation assistance to any family, individual, business, nonprofit ordanf ration or farm Chat results from implementation of its CDBG programs. It is the policy of the City to avoid tlisplatement of all families, individuals, 6usineszes, nonprofit organizations and farms in carrying out its COGB programs. No displacement i5 expected to result from the activities proposed for the 1985-86 fiscal year. However, in the event that operation df any of the CDBG funded programs results in the voluntary or involuntary displacement of any family, individual, business, nonprofit organization, or farm (whether owner or renter) the City will provide relocation assist ante in accordance with the standards and guide tines set tortn in the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act and Section 7260 et.sed, of the State of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and the guidelines issued by the Commission of Housing and Community Development. The City will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff and consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors, social agencies, and civic organizations. It is the City's objective that all displacees be relocated with a minimum of hardship in accommodations which are decent, safe, sanitary, and suitable to their individual needs; located in areas not less desSra6le than their current location in regard to public utfliti es and public and commercial facilities, and reasonahly accessible to their customers or places of employment; and priced within their financial means. the City anticipates no relocations, and will handle those which result from implementation of CDBG acti of ties in an individual, case-by-case manner. Services provided to eligible displacees sha 11 include but not be limited to: Providing information on project activities, rights, benefits, and options open to them. Maintaining liaison between displacees and agencies or firms with resources to assist them (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, Small Business Administration, Office of Local Economic Oevelapment, lending institutions, realtors, etc.) locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the production of accommodations to meet the needs of all displacees. Resoluclon lio. 85-93 page 4 o Assisting displacees in obtaining financing. o Assisting displacees in securing priority consideration for Sect ton 8, public housing, or other housing assistance programs. o Making referrals to appropriate social, community, and welfare agencies. o Assisting eligible displacees to prepare claims for all relocation asst stance payments to which they are entitled. a o Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinaitng all relocation activities. o Providing all families, individuals, businesses, institutions, and farms which are displaced by CDBG-funded programs, with written notice of tMS pOticy, the types of service available to them, and the amount of relocation assistance benefits for which they may De eligible. (Payments will De those .t 1t~FeA Ay .~.t.t. ..^... f..c or g7~daif is i.j City staff and consultants witl De available to answer Questions and provide information, and by their early involvement to see that relocation proceeds with a minimum of hardship. AESOL0220N N0. 85-93 1 flESOLUTION DF THE CITT COUNCIL OF 7HE CITI OF A1NCH0 CUClMONGA AOOPS2NC THE PpELIHINART STATQ471T OF COMMUNITT OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS £OA PAELININAAY FUNDING FOP TBE COHMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCH GRANT PAOGAIM FOR FISCAL lEAA 1985/86 NB£AEASr The City of poncho Cucamonga Ss m Ebtlilemmt City :order the regulatSons governing the Community Development Block Grant program; and NHEAEA$, the City Staff has received proposals for protects and programs from various organl xatlons in the Community; and NBEPEAS, Lhe Clty Staff has conducted a needs assessment to detemive program ellgib111ty and needs; and NFIEAEAS, the CSLy released a Preliminary Statement of Community Obte ct Saes Svd lca ling in priority order all programs end Drotects submitted for Block DrenL funding Sn the next program year, and NHEAEA$, the CSty Council has held a legally noticed puhilc hearing - in order to glue Lhe public m opportunity to respond to staff rocommendatiom for program funding and to put forth for Connell consideration recommendetlons of their ow; and NNEAEAS, the Clty Couveil has heartl public Lestimany and received all public input regarding the Clty~a Co®unity Development Block Crent Program for the next program year. NON, THEAEFOflE, BE IT RESOLVE-, that the City Council of Lhe CSYy of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions; _ A. Atlopt the Relocation Assistance Policy. ', B. Datermine that operation of the Houaing PehaD111tat1on program in the flood plain Ss Lne most practical and desirable of Lhe alternatives, and the proposed mitigation measwes are sufficient. ' i C. Select for preliminary Cunding the following protects and programs to be funded out of the City~s Community Development Block Grant award: Protect/Program Amount 1. Housing Aehab111taL1ov >j 80,000 '', _. 2. North ioun Park (development) 3150,000 (2nd Year Funding) 3. North Torm Streets (Area Z) 3153,000 - (2nd Year Funding) -- 4. HandSCaD Signs i 5,000 5. Local Costs/Program Implementation - a. kLtwe Protects g 10,000 b. Contracts and ldminSStratlov 3 26,000 c. Programs Management j 42,000 d. FaSr Housing Services = 7,000 6. Contingency TOTAL 73r 000 Aeaolutlon No. 85-93 Pnge 2 PISSED, IPPRDYED, and iDOPTED tbia 20th day of !larch, 1985. D. MS cola, May r ITTEST: ,,,. d Q ~ ,y QA Beverly Authelet, C ty Clerk I, BEYERLI A. IBTBELET, CITY CLEA6 0! the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Aeaolution, being Rsaolution No. 85-93, vaa duly paaaed, approved, and sdopted by the City Comcdl, st a regular meeting of aadd City Council bald oo the 20th dsy of March, 1985, and that the name vsa pnaaed and adopted by the tolloring vote, IYES: Nright, Buquet, Mikela, Dehl ROES: None lBSENT: Sing Ezecuted thin 21st day of March, 1985 st Amcho Cucamonga, California. -- IIUK~ D (li~~~ ~~ Beverly Wthelet, Clty Clerk The fern^':r~: ;~ ~ .,.-.~„'c a co^ect copy of .,~., ~ ,. ~~~ 5: :: ifi t`~fs ofncc. ATTEST: ~~+ ~? 19$L - BEVER~f A. R,UTFI_! CT City Clerk, RenchD Cucarnon~a, CaBf. BY: `Z~ur. $ ~o...p s z Fo it F 'w k, i~~~ 5 Z ... T O C I I r C - Q ~ ti c y O ~-~ I A I i i y N p 6 ~. a. ~ A L Lsi `~ ' o ~ .,: ' 5 . G c1 v I N ~ Op O t}"' U J 0 L F . ^ L N d N ~I .•~'T a$ a, ~ Q ~w I I T Z I ;~`c 4i of U J 7 A i .n 3 ; ~ s ~ S ~, rn 6 v 3 ~ y ~ < y n m ryry u ~ ~ C ~ i C ~ rv `o' , , C ~ .-~ C ~ ~ 7 V E7 q ~+ .+ ~ ~ ~ CC ~ 4 'J < m3 ° S y `N ~ ~ G 0 . ~ ~ . g A „~, " ". ,. y v ~, u c~ ~ ~, ~ B. u u a ~ ~ e ~ . .~ ~ ' ~ ~ ° ~ .y CV o a ~ 3 ° ., u `o r i (i V1 N n N ~p C 5 ~~~ Gv~'MOi~.~,~ t .~ l r ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ z VII. Certifications ~ a 1977 ~J CEICf 1 P I GT IGNS The grantee certifies test: (a) It possesses legal authority to make n grant submiulon end to execute a -. community development end housing program; (b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed e5 en official act a resolution, motion or similar action authcrizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to submit the final statement end all understandings end assurances contained therein, and directing end authorizing the person identified es the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with the submission of the tine] statement end to provide such additional inform anon as may be required; _ (c) Prior to subm iuion of its fine) statement to HUD, the grantee has: -- (I) met the citizen participation requirements of S 570.301(ex2) end has provided citizens with: - (A) the estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to oe used [or activities that will benefit persons of low end moderate - income; end (B) its plan for minimizing displncement of persotu es a result of activities assisted with CDBG funds aM to assist persons actually displaced es a result of such activities; (2) prepared its final statement of community development objectives end projected use of funds in sccordence with S 570.301(s1(3) end made the final statement available to the public; (r,) The grant will be conducted end edministered in rnmplience with: (U Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352; 42 U.S.C. 2000d et say.); end (2) Title VDI of the Civil Rights Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 90-284; 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seg.} (e) It wBI affirmatively further fair Causing; February 1884 I (f) IL has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so es to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families a aid in ttre prevention or eliminetioo o! slums or blight; (the final statement o[ projected use of funds may also include activities which the grantee certifies ere designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditiore pose a serious end immediate threat to the health or welfare o[ the community, end other financial resources ere not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBC funds received under section 106 of the Act end, if applicable, under section 1D8 of the Act, during 1984-85 (e period specified Dy the grantee consisting of I, 2, or 9 program years , she principally benefit persons o[ low end moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 51 percent of such funds ere used for activities that benefit such persons during such period; (g) It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified in paragraph (t) above, that identifies community development end housing needs end specifies both short end tong-term community development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective end requirements of the Acl; (hl II ii fnllnw~inn w rumrnl hnp<inv accictnnre plan whinh hac Donn V, my..!I Mr Nilil pursuant to S 570.906; (i) It wdl not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted ir. whole or in pert with funds provided under section 106 of the Act or with amounts resulting Crorn a guarantee under section 108 of the Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and m oderete income, including any tee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvemenb, unless: (1) funds received unCer section 106 of the Act ere used to pay the proportion of such fee or essecsm ant that relates to the enpitel costs of such public improvements that are financed from revenue sources other than under Title 1 the Act; or (2) for purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned end occupied by persons of low end moderx to income who ere not persons of low income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it leeks sufficient funds received under section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (I); end Q) It wi0 rnmply with the other provisions of the Aet end with other epplicxble Iews. • p I~TTV /T TP T A \t/~Til1 l~T il~ ~ AA/1 \i!~ STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Llnyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Bond Sale - Alta Loma Channel Assessment Bistrict 84-2 ~V.. ~_ ....U^C •9 ^, ~~ > ~= }', ~ I~'A ~~I> 19i Attached for Council execution is a Resolution absolving M. L. Stern & Co. from their offer to acquire bonds on Assessment District 84-2 and rewarding the sale to Stone and Youngberg. As you are aware because of tax delinquencies outstanding in the District, M. L. Stern has withdrawn their bid and requested that we return their 515,000 good faith deposit. Although we are not required to comply with this request, our Financial Consultants, Fieldman and Rolapp were able to renegotiate the bond sale with Stone and Youngberg under identical sale conditions. Under these circumstances, the City will not be damaged in anyway and to avoid costly litigation, we would recommend absolving Stern and proceed to bond closure with Stone & Youngberg. Attached are correspondence from M. L. Stern, the new proposal from Stone & Youngberg and the Resolution transferring the award of bond sale. Staff recommends retention of M. L. Stern's good faith deposit until successful closing of the bond sale. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the Resolution absolving M. L. Stern & Co. from bond bids and reaward ing the sale to Stone & Youngberg under the stated terms. Respectfully submittedC,,~/,/~,~/~j, /~~~~~~~' V ~ ' - ' ' ~~ < L8 :j a Attachments ' ~ MUNICIPAL BONDS ~~"~ ! ,~~ .~,.a. May 2, 1985 Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Boz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Assessment District No. 84=2 Alta Loma Flood Control) Dear Mr. Wasserman, On March 14, 1985, M.L. Stern 8 Co., Inc., as manager, with Miller 8 Schroeder Municipals, Inc. and Smith Barney, Harris Upham 8 Co., Inc, as joint managers, were the successful bidder for the bonds to be issued on behalf of the above- captioned District. Subsequent to the date of sale, certain information regarding _ tax delinquencies became available that had not been available at the time of the sale. This information had a "'~' negative impact on the security of the bonds, and as a result thereof, Miller 8 Schroeder Municipals, Inc. and Smith, ' Barney, Harris Upham 8 Co., Inc, wrote us indicating that [hey would not either participate in this account or consummate the acquisition of their share of bonds; copies of ' [he letters are enclosed. As you know, in an attempt to save the underwriting, we enlisted the help of the City and [he Financial Consultant in certain matters pertaining to what we could do [o insure that [he tax delinquencies were fully disclosed to potential bond purchasers; [his help was generously given and was appreciated. We also had numerous conversations with the delinquent 8350 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Mills.CaWornla 90211 (2I3) 650-4001 I3rancn Olhces Ccrtnel San Diego Sacramento Member NASD SIFC ~' Page Two Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman May 2, 1985 property owners who were very cooperative and candid with us at all times. As a result of the information gathered, and working with our attorney, we prepared a disclosure document (enclosed) that on Monday, Aprfl 29, 1985, was sent to all of the bond purchasers of M.L. Stern & Co.,Inc., together with a copy of the Financial Consultant's "Information for Bidders Document". Our purpose was to ascertain if, with full disclosure, the purchasers would nonetheless determine to complete the transaction and pay for their bonds. Unfortunately, this is not the case. We have received many cancellations from our own clients since [he additional disclosure. Our joint manager partners have expressed their course of action in Che letters previously referred to. Therefore, we are informing the Ci[y [hat we do not intend to complete this unAerwri tiny, and herr.by ronnq=r rhn retcrn ^f ,._r <+c~nnn Woad faith deposit. Should the [ax delinquency problem be resolved satisfactorily, we stand ready to submit another bid [o the Ci[y for the bonds. Very Cruly yours, M.L. STERN 8 CO., INC. as Co-Manager ~~~~~~1~ Paul H. White Senior Vite President cc: Norman R. McPhail Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. William D. Lippman Smith, Barney Harris Upham & Co., Inc. Lawrence G, Rolapp Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates t f y BIG FORM FOR 1915 ACT poYDS 67 ro: c11t atlas car a' RAHID acvnrw 9yaaC tgaellR Roatl floc arum ~ HI! Raz:rLO Clca~. Califamla 91TA ~: Pt~l fa I~aae~c Bxa1s Ae~R msu`Sa ro. ee-e (Al~t® Blow Cmhol Qenel), MOt m F~xd ft,%ID512 In am:"a`re nth all tens artf raMiL'as Ot yar tbhro of Sale of Ltpryveoertc &rz's, I~nvaenc Eaq ACi of 1915, Assessa:c Dfss.. tb. &-2 tgYN rebruaty 6, 1435. w saG.~_: 1JE Icllnarg httl for L„mvec~c &rts (Lyeovamt Botl Att et 1915) m Ce tlatat lay 2, 1935, or 4e 31r. GY after re:ez^aam oL t1p assess~t roll aw tlaa,;ray «hirlever is lacer, vtC. interest payable Ja`vpry I, t~ an] Ce: ml`sr saaLtr:nnl/y on Janiprj 2 ant July 2: B][E MATIRRr: II[B~Id•S1' PATE B]iS lNTtliMt IIl1FF6-4' PA1E tom/ t9?5 .y t~ ,_~i t9~ a 7 12y ~~- 999~~-c 1~ Go t93; ~4 1~ 7 » + t?Y s. 19;G ~2 °~ tom'. 4 2(C` _~~F t¢s s I, L4.Z orG.Yo Me nil Fey Rf £ for a oml oT E wntc~ rs a dumnUpn~+o: b FC, 4,25' /.o itoa 7e 51,7T~,5tL lpe' vale, plus a¢ivm intenast m wie of delivery. Asa ®rar c Ir:iansa t:m, Tie ufte:est CS:. ]t: armRl:ICe ntT tip above hltl, ls: Crow Lnterest Coss E I. SGl, F>'7. 0 9 Discant/Pm~r:n b .FL, yir. Lo ~ ww tL: L`f1FPPci~1' C3T E_L6tr 1L. G9 '- I.~Ve ,kt 1rIlYR3T INLe Y. S d I 1Ms offer SS suCJCCt m a sttssIacmry le~l opi:.tm try F. Maryrile B:can, Inc„ Ran:.:o Sa^.2 y Fe, Cal iicm:a, a'%^vin5 ttn vali6l.y e: ve baxs, at y~zr eke:'. zA p~lasctl !e:etn 1s a GsNer's or CertL'SCd tacos In me sur.c of E'.5,~ ~yabte to ve o:y- a[ ve Cffy Q' RANEO Q.GNIIC.A. Hurt: to request re re[uzve.i p:v~:ly sn tte event w ant nst tte su~esstul hlutler, otremse W w retaz+el aW appilrJ avpt'ist Lp pur'nss puce of to ~~. 4us bitl is mte szb(rct w Ve oxi'atlms (Lf arry) s`v.;l Sn Vp reverse sltle oI v1s Ct^. for S:battte0 by: ~ ,.. Daer P4vLers of ve S}'tirq;e a:e: ~ //. ~. SMltll g/MNC`/ 7T HRMHbbjt M,c~[w k futi[,ry~ 1" NnuAGb7, ^ «MZ:.~pr: L cL wiz: 3//'~/~!' ^5~ t D Y _. _. gn:lioimn. eoox ._... .__ _ -.. __~ ~~ First „o=,~~„~^ N°_ 7745477 - ~,k noon nonr~.o~a, cA Slroz Cashiers Check a, , a> _ i/o o.rc 3-13-s5 FAY ~'~rit^~ """I5.O~OdC1;~00C!'s b.ls,DDB.BB« Sbh ///~JJ i tome ««CITY OF RANCHO (UCANONLA>•« C e ~~Fr~I~«` aa0en or yr«o«~tco , P177765U 77n• C4220C1C12lBrtL 370~9A• Ow• LL B%30 s~r<»L R ~~o~~~<.~3r,[~c. MEM9EP5 P/1"GiC S.OCR I,;HaN GE May 13, 1985 The Honorable Members of the C.i ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California Re: Offer to Purchase Bo rds in the Sum of $1,716,794.26 City of Rancho Cucamonga Improvement Bonds Assessment District No. 84-2 Members of the Council: Pursuant to discussions with your bond counsel, financial consultant, and our investigation and analysis of the captioned bond issue, Stone s Youngberg hereby offers to purchase all of said bonds subject to the following conditions: 1. The bonds shall be issued pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and the Improvement bond Act of 1915. 2. The par value of the bonds shall be in the amount of 51,716,794.26. The bonds shall mature in each year and in the amounts and at the rates of interest set forth on the attached maturity schedule marked Exhibit A. 3. The bonds shall be issued in denominations of $5,000, or in integral multiples thereof as may be requested by the Underwriters. All bonds shall be issued in registered form in accordance with instructions to be determined by Stone a Youngberg prior to closing. The City shall retain Bank of America, N.T.SS.A., Los Angeles, CA as Fiscal Agent, Registrar and Paying Agent. 5. The bonds shall be dated May 2, 1985 and be delivered on or about May 29, 1985 but in no event later than June 20, 1985. 6. The bonds shall mature from July 2, 1986 through July 2, 2005. 7. The City shall establish from the proceeds of the bonds a reserve fund equal to ten. percent (108) of the principal amount of the bonds. The reserve fund shall be administered pursuant to the Resolution of Issuance for the hoods, as well as pursuant to applicable federal laws and regulations. The reserve fund balance shall be shown as a separately stated item in the City's annual financial report. X606 LANNERSRIM UOULEVARD. SURF. 202 ~ NO NOLLV4VOOD. CAUfORNIA 9t 602 ~ (BBB) 906~m21 The Honorable Members of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. May 13, 1985 Page 2 8. The City shall convenant to commence judicial foreclosure of delinquent assessments within 150 days after any delinquency. 9. The City shall award the sale of the bonds to Stone & Youngberg at their meeting on May 15, 1985. 10. The purchase price shall be 958 percent of par (a discount of 5$), plus accrued interest. 11. The purchase price of the bonds shall be paid in full upon delivery to Stone a Youngberg of the bonds accompanied by: (a) The unqualified approving legal opinion of F. Mackenzie Brown, Inc., Rancho Sante Fe, California, Bond Counsel. The legal opinion shall be printed on the bonds at no charge to us. Ibl a no-litigation certificate of the City. 12. The obligations of Stone s Youngberg to accept delivery of and pay for the bonds on the Closing ^ate shall be subject, at the option of Stone s Youngberg, to the following additional conditions: ~ (a) At the Closing Date, the Resolution and any other applicable agreements shall be in full force and effect, and shall not have been amended, modified or supplemented except as may have been agreed in writing by Stone 6 Youngberg, and there shall have been taken in connection therewith, with the issuance of the Bonds and with the transactions contemplated thereby and by this Purchase Contract, all such actions as, in the opinion of F. Mackenzie Brown, Inc., Bond Counsel for the City, shall be necessary and appropriate; (b) between the date thereof and the closing date, the market price or marketability of [he bonds at the initial offering prices set forth herein shall not have been materially adversely affected, ir, the judgement of Stone & Youngberg (evidenced by a writtr_n notice to the City terminating the obligation of Stone & Youngbnrg to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds) by reason of any of the following: The Honorable Members of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga May 13, 1985 Page 3 (1) Legislation enacted (or resolution passed) by the Congress of the United States of America or a decision rendered by a court established under Article III of the Constitution of the United States of America or by the Tax Court of the United States of America, or an order, ruling, regulateion (final, temporary or proposed), press release or other form of notice issued or made by or on behalf of the Treasury Department of the Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America, with the purpose or effect, directly or indirectly, of imposing federal income taxation upon the interest as would be received by the holders of the bands; (2) Legislation enacted for resolution passed) by the Cnnnrncv of the U.^,i tcd G -~vf ivuvrica, or an order, decree or injunction issued by any court of competent jurisdication, or an order, ruling, regulation (final, temporary or proposed), press release oz other form of notice issued or made by or on behalf o£ the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction of the subject matter, to the effect that obligations of the general character of, the Bonds, or the Bonds, including any or all underlying arrangements, are not exempt from registration under or other requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or that the Resolution is not exempt from qua lifici.ation under or other requirements of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, or that the issuance, offering or sale of obligations of the general character of the Bonds, or of the Bonds, including any or all underwriting arrangements, as contemplated hereby or by the Official Statement or otherwise is or would be in violation of the federal securities laws as amended and then in effect; (3) The withdrawal or downgrading of any rating of any securities of the City by a national municipal bond rating agency; The Honorable Members of the City Council of, the City of Rancho Cucmm~ngn May 13, 1985 Page 4 (4) Any amendment to the Fcdcral or California constitution or action by any Federal or California court, legislative body, regulatory body or other autho r.ity materially adversely affecting the tax status of the City, its property, income, securities (or interest thereon), validity or enforceability of the assessments or the ability of the City to construct the improvements as contemplated by the Resolution and the Official Statement; or IS) any event occurring, or information becoming known which, in the judgment of Stone & Youngberg makes untrue or misleading in any material respect any statement or information contained in the Official Statement concerning the City, th=_ improvement Project, the landowner, developer, v. ..u p~vY..r ..Y uoocopVU. 13. This bid is conditioned upon the successful consummation of the assessment. district proceedings and should said proceedings for any reason fail to be successfully consu,mnated, there shall be no obligation on the part of the City. 14. Enclosed herein is a Cashier's Check in the amount of $15,000.00 payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be retained and applied against the purchase price of the bonds. Respectfully submitted, STONE 6 o n L~ Partner JD:jss Enclosure EXHIBIT A MATURITY SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT BONDS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 64-2 Maturity Date Principal Interest (July 21 Amount Rate 1986 S 36,794.26 9.008 1987 65,000.00 9.008 1988 70,000.00 9.002 1589 75,000.00 9.008 1990 85,000.00 9.00& 1991 90,000.00 9.008 1992 100,000.00 9.008 1993 105,000.00 9.008 1994 115,000.00 9.008 1995 130.000.00 9.n08 ]996 140,000.00 9.fi08 1997 155,000.00 9.608 1998 165,000.00 9.758 1999 185,000.00 9.758 2000 200,000.00 7.258 $1,716,794.26 RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND FOR THE PAYMENT Of SAID BONDS WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has heretofore instituted and conducted proceedings under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, in a special as seszment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, WHEREAS, in the Resolution of Intention it was determined and declared that bonds should issue under the provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, this City Council did, by the adoption of Resolution No. R5-99, accept and approve a written proposal received from M. L. Stern b Co., Inc. for the purchase of the improvement bonds representing unpaid assessments in said Assessment District; and, WHEREAS, by letter of May 2, 1985, M. L. Stern b Co., Inc. did inform the City that they did not intend to complete the underwriting for said Assessment District and did further request the return of their good-faith deposit; and, WHEREAS, there has now been received, in proper form, a proposal for the purchase of said bonds to issue under said proceedings, and said proposal received is considered to be the hid that would best serve the int erest5 of owners of land included within the Assessment District and should he accepted. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2. That the written proposal received from STONE b YOUNG BERG for the purchase of improvement bonds representing unpaid assessments in said Assessment District is hereby accepted and approved. SECTION 3. That said sale is subject to ail the terms and conditions as set forth in the Resolution of Intention, the accepted proposal, and all other related bond authorization documentation. SECTION 4. That the Treasurer be, and hereby is, directed to have the bonds printed immediately, and said Treasurer shall then have said bonds signed and delivered to said bidder upon receipt of the anount of monies due pursuant to said proposal and upon the performance of all the conditions as set forth in the written proposal. SECTION 5. That the interest rate or rates on said bonds be, and the smne hereby is fixed at the rate or rates as set forth in said accepted proposal SECTION 6. That the 7r eas urer is hereby authorized and directed to keep a redemption fund designated by Lhe name of the proceedings, into which he shall place all sums received for the collection of the assessments and the interest thereon, together with all penalties, if applicable, thereon and from which he shall dishurse such funds to the registered owner. Under no circumstances shall the said bands or interest thereon be paid out of any other fund except as provided 6y law. Said fund shall be known as the R ED'cMPTION FUND, and shall be designated by the nave of this Assessment District. SECTION 1. That the Treasurer shall transfer monies as necessary from the SPECIAL RESERVE FUND in the manner and form as authorized by law. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985. CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST L K CITY OF RANCHO LUCPMONGA STATE OF CAL (PORN IA STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, BEVERLY A. AUTHEL ET, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONf,A, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested 6y the City Clerk, all at the meeting of said City Council held on the day of --~gg5, and that the same was passed and adopted ~y tTie following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EXEC UTEB this day of 1985, at Rancho Cut amonga, Cnl ifnrn.. L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA [SEAL] SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY WEST END OFFICE 1510 Mountain Aranur Ontuio, CA 91762 (7161966-1221 May 10, 1985 Mr. Stephen C. Stewart Cuthhert & Coleman 1036 West Covina Parkway, Suite 200 West Covina, California 91793-1858 Re: Helton - MWV 92520 Dear Mr. Stewart: ennis Kottmeier ~~ District Attorney After discussing the above matter with Mr. McPherson it appears to me that Mr. Helton's representations to you were a devious effort to bluff you into a dismissal. Helton was a victim of a burglary which was prosecuted by McPherson a couple of years ago. Since then Helton has occasionally - -~-cted [ - -s Jil aL ~,ui ~ilice for procedural assis- tance in handling minor court problems. Mr. McPherson had no contact with Helton in connection with the above case. I see no real or potential conflict now cr in the future should our office take over the handling of the case. Sincerely, DENNIS KOTTMEIER District Attorney BY l . //~1I E. Nathan Schilt Chief De pu[y District Attorney ENS:lyd cc: Lauren Wasserman Rancho Cucamonga City Manager rr~nv nc n n w~nvn ~i rn n nnnwrn n -- -- - N STAFF REPORT ~~° °y. e; ~: DATE: May 15, 1985 _ T0: City Council and City Manager w ' ,I FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kra11, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Subordination Agreement for 12972 Victoria Avenue submitted by Robert Smith A Lien Agreement to guarantee the future construction of street improvements for 12972 Victoria Avenue was approved by City Council on November 7, 1984. In order to secure a loan, the lender requires that the Lien Agreement be subordinate to a lien in favor of the lender. Mr. Robert Smith has submitted the attached Subordination Agreement for City Council approval. RECDIMENDATIDN It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Su fiord inat ion Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Re ectfully submitted, ,r j LBH K:kG~~a ~~~~~~ Attachments RESOLUTION N0. E05-15-1OR A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM ROBERT SMITH AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO S[GN SAME (12972 VICTORIA AVENUE) WHEREAS, a Real Property improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, street trees and street lights along Victoria Avenue was approved by City Council on November 7, 1984 and recorded in San Bernardino County on November 16, 1984, Instrument No. 84-216313; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above-mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said 5ubord in at ion Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. Mi a s, Mayor ATTEST: ever y A, ut e et, ity er i, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, C[TY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the 22nd day of May, 1985. Executed this 22nd day of May, 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ever y A. Aut a et, ty er iii a yr xa~un~ t;uuanu!v~a ui~sro MEMORANDUM ~'0~~~~'~ ~, ~~ _ _~__ ,I DATE: May 13, 1985 ~9%%~ T0: Mayor and Members of the 'ty ouncil FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT; PLANNING COMMISSION AD , 0 COMMITTEE REVIEW OF TENTATIVE TRACT 10349 - PLAZA RU I4DE S On Thursday, May 9, 1985, the Ad Roc Committee, est abtished by the City Council at their May 1, 1985 meeting, met to discuss design criteria for Tentative Tract 10349. The Committee has selected alternatives and made recommendations which will be presented at the May 15th City Council meeting. Attached please find a copy of the meeting minutes, which summarize the criteria and recommendations. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at any time. RG/jr Att arhment CC: Planning Commission MINUTES OF MAY 9, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING FOR TRACT 10349 The meeting of the Planning Commission ad hoc committee was held on May 9, 1985 at the Neighborhood Center. The purpose of this meeting is to establish criteria and specific recommendations for design review consideration on the redesign of Tentative Tract 10349. The following summarizes these criteria and retoncnendations: Architecture. 1. Provide an architectural theme that is compatible to the Thoroughbred Street homes - Tract 9350. This theme should be designed towards the Country/English or Country/French style through the following details: A. Roof materials should be of wood shake (fire retardant per City standards) or flat concrete tiles in earthtones. Red Spanish the is not compatible. 8. High pitch roof and mansard should be provided. C. Multi-pane windows. D. Brick and fieldstone veneers should be provided on front elevat tons. E. Chimney design should include brick or fieldstone veneer. 2. Floor plans should 6e designed to have a wider elevation and include side-on entry garages. 3. Provide an equal distribution of various size of floor plans ranging from a minimum of 2,400 sq. ft. to 3,000 plus sq. ft. On-Site Improvements. 1. Provide concrete driveways, curb and gutters. 2. Provide front yard landscaping that includes 80% sod, automat+c irrigation system, 20% ground cover, and 25 5- gallon minimum size trees and shrubs. 3, Provide side yard (return) decorative masonry block walls or brick and fieldstone veneers. Minutes of Planning Commission Ad Hac Conenittee Meeting - TT 10349 May 9, 1985 Page 2 Off-Site Improvements. 1. Provide north/south equestrian trails (see Alternate 1). 2. Provide side:ea lk en one side of the street per City standards. 3. Continue the same street trees on Thoroughbred Street (liquid amber trees). 4. Rfter reviewing the two alternate circulation systems regarding traffic flow and drainage, the Planning Commission ad hoc committee recommended Alternate 1 as having the equitable flow of traffic (see attached). S- _..__ .-- ` '~:' - ~ _ e6 t ~ ~ o ~ _ _ 3 i - ' -. __-_.__-- _... -- ,- ,. _ ~ . --- --- _ 7 ----- - I _ ~ . -- ' - - ~- - , _ - -- ~ _ . '-w ice-. C ___ _ _ __ __ ~ ~, ~ 7°. _~~ ----__ _ __ __ - _ __~_ C ~ ~ ~ ~ --- ~- -- _ - -_ -•1 _f- ~. --- --- ----- ~ -- ~ ~ I ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ---- _ - ---- ~ -~-? = - - - -I --- -d 3 it ly A i _____._ __ r .~`l -_. _- ___ L ~ _ ~ \\\ ~ __ ~. -.. -- M I ~-v-~-~ - ~ - _ -- i i -- N i ,_ ~ , I ~ ~_-. ~~,- ,~ ~. --- --- ~~ .I! ,"- Ill -_-_\,:, ,~ ~ ;gym ~° ,., ; i a ' ~~._~ ~\ ~ _ V d~A ~. ~ i ~ -1 y. - _. -- .. _._ ~ ~ ~ [ W r Y\ - - - ..... __ ' 9 ~ A _. . _ - _. s C C s- 2 - r r;l j ~: I 7 .%~ ~~_ _, ~C~ C; G C: i ~~ A i i~ `I n U '+- U _~[~~e loll ~ ~1 .. i ~ ~ ! .. 'A . ~ ; --- ~--- --- ---g -_ -_--- ___ __.-__~ I-_ -~ ~~~---------~~y~ __ ~~ ~, ~~ ~ __ ---_ g .,~ i,1i ~.I ,; ~, iii, /~~ _ ~` e - -- ~~ ~ /. -- iii _-'1 ~ / '% -- -~~~-. --.-~ i i ~_i~, --- - - ~-- - --- ---- N " D ~- mil` .. ._ m jai ___~ ._-~- ~/~ a y ~ --I m z __ 8._.___ r t ~ * 2 y ~' t°' ~ ~ V°f ~ r I~ ~ ~__ ~ ~,~,~p ~ ~o ~ ~ y `' , ~ b . €F ~'1 ~:,.. ~jk~~ f. .nu Ei L MnR+.u.AY ~. Eu ~ A:.-. v5 n~ RnLau O ~. P,uS ^.u .9 PiG VO.a M1 VUO E:i OM1'E .'. ~ C -E ti:ER C RCL. f OU A'~. FLOOR f,C 90% iJ59 3 REP, CA L~f ORNIP 92622 1059 (i,~a~, 290~090i 'ELE e.~O.Y E< ~2~I G9~-90i1 May 14, 1985 Dan Cole;nan Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 80~ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 HAND DELIVE P.ED Re: Potential requirement to amend Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No. 1 Dear DaR: Last week we had the opportunity to discuss the above-referenced matter. As we discussed, Lewis Homes is in the process of amending Terra Vista plan so as to allow more acreage to be devoted to hospital and related uses. In fact, at tomorrow evening's Council meeting, second reading o£ an ordinance amending the land use designation for that. area will be considered by the Council. The above-referenced amendment leaves us in some- what of a quandary as the Planning Commission and Council will not have approved a cohesive revision to the entire Terra Vista plan which redistributes potential land uses throughout the affected areas. For example, the area which was previously designated for hospital use must be redesiy- nated and there probably will have to be some redistribution of potential residential land uses within certain density ranges. There also remains the question of the auto center or other commercial uses being reduced by way of acreage as an exception to reducing residential acreage. In reviewing the above-referenced dove ].opment agreement, 2 did notice that paragraph 7 may well be affected by the process being discussed in this letter. In exchange f.or certain park requirements from Lewis Homes, the City agreed not to undertake to reduce the mid-range total Dan Coleman May 14, 1985 Page TWo density of *_he Terra Vista area below 6,000 dwclliny units. Vihi le it is arguable that a change in land use designations generated by rec,uest of Lewis Homes was not contemplated in oaraaraPh 7, I believe it is as easily argued that the City must finally undertake to reduce any mid-range density as the Cit7's act whether or not requested by Lewis Homes. Accord ingly, if the final land use plan amendment processed thrnu^h the Planning Commission and City Council results in a total mid-ranoe density below 8,000 dwelling units, it is my opinion that the subject development ayreement should be simultaneously amended to reduce the mid-range dwelling unit figure in paragraph 7. That amendment, of course, must be processed in the same manner as a zoning ordinance with public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am sure that we all prefer a "clean" procedure in amenAinn tha Terra Vista nlan and; not entially. ananrling the development agreement. Accordingly, unless Lewis Homes is able to demonstrate that there is an immediate need for second reading of the ordinance before the Council tomorrow evening to obtain some entitlement for the hospital, it may be Zvi se to defer second reading of the subject ordinance until the Council has before it an entire package processed by Lewis Homes through the Planning Commission and to the Council, which will finally rearrange the Terra Vista land uses in a manner acce ptabie to all. If the Council approves second reading and the hospital is constructed or finally committed to prior to the entire specific plan being re- arranged, the City staff, Plannino Commission and Council may be placed under pressure from the developer to agree to the developer's proposals based on the fact that a portion of the plan was modified with Council approval Prior to con- sideration of all of the implications. I know that this letter is in some respect amor- phous but it is difficult to deal more specifically with the processing, problem new presented to us. Please advise if. I may be of further assistance to you on this item. Very truly yours, -:ilJ'l James L. Markman Cit}' Attorney JLM:sjk City of Rancho Cucamonga L.cwren - ThiS is u tvpy of a lelte'' from Latuis HomQs ~r ;,i~ni M .lLir Gi~ Cpvnu'I on ~Fht Mu/h'- Fyni ly ~d g-cgram. Lin4a LEWIS HOMES 1156 Non6 Moumm~ naenue / P O Be. 6)0 / t: bnd. Cw~lomu 9 V BS I ]la 98509)1 May 9, 1985 Mayor Jon D. Mikels City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 8a se Line Road Pan cho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: A PROPOSED REVENUE BOND PROGRAM FOR RENTAL HOUSING FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dear Mayor Mikels: We are extremely supportive of a proposal to institute a tax-exempt revenue bond program to finance rental hou sf ng in the City. We feel that such a financing vehicle is vital to the success of rental projects for companies irh _ hh9f buu'.1d projects which we own and manage rather than selling the projects to investors. We believe that Drojects that are locally managrd and owned are much better for the citizens of any community because Dro6lems can be more readily and easily addressed and solutions obtained than if one were required to deal with grouDS of out-of-state investn rs. We believe the henefits of such a program far nu twei gh any perceived detriments and, upon a careful examination, we do not believe that these detriments really exist. The recent increase in apartment construction in Southern California is almost exclusively the result of tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond financing. Without this financing vehicle, very few apartments would be built. To date, more than S38 million in bonds have been issued to finance our rental projects in California. As you are aware, employers seeking to relocate in the industrial area of the City will pay special attention to the quantity and quality of affords bie housing for their employees. Similarly, we have found that major neighborhood shoDOing center tenants want to be in the Citv, but are reluctant to proceed until more housing is constructed. We believe this condition also exists for the tenants in the proposed regional center. Very significant sales and property tax revenues will be derived from these centers; however, we don't believe these Drojects will be constructed without additional population. In virtually all communities, a significant portion of the Dopulatinn, including many stable higher-income households, traditionaily chooses to rent rather than buy. We believe that the construction of additional units will satisfy this community need for rental units in a manner desirable to the City. Mavor don D. Mikels May 9, 1985 Page 2 Ne know that you are concerned about several items that you see as potential problems which might stem from such a program. We have some information that should allay those concerns. A concern has been voiced as to whether such a program would increase the number of "Section 8" renters in the City. We feel that this would not 6e the case. To support this contention, we have analyzed the history of projects financed through the County of San Bernardino Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. It should be noted, as set forth in the May 1 City Council Staff Report, that the County repo fires more than the minimum standards for its program. As a result, under the County program, it could be more likely for individuals with lower incomes to rent units than under a City alternative plan. In this regard, the County's history woo id present a "worst case" compared with a City alternative plan. From 1983 to the present, the County of San Bernardino has issued bonds to finance a number of projects. Some of these were for senior citizen projects, but tha majority were for standard unrestricted rental projects. Twelve of the projects that would fall in this tatter category have been completed or are far enough along in the construction process to be rents nq units. These twelve projects contain 954 units, Not one of these units is currently rented to a "Section 8" tenant, It appears that, in practice, Section 8 certificate holders do not rent these units 6ecau se rents are greatly in excess of the Section R standard. The May 1 City staff re Dort indicates that the mf nimum rents under the County program exceed Section 8 guidelines from 4126 to 5135 per month depending nn the type of unit, Another concern which has been voiced is that the implementation of this program would result in a concentration of "poor people" in these rental projects. We feel that this will not be the case. We compiled information on the household incomes of our tenants in our new Pa rkv sew Place apartment project in Terra Vista, a pro,iect which was financed through the County of San Bernardino's Mortgage Revenue Bond Program, as well as information on our Sunsca pe West Dro,iect located on Nineteenth near Carnelian, which was financed conventionally, The median household income for the units rented to date in Pa rkview Place is apP roxima tely 529,930/year. 25X of the households have incomes that would permit them to qualify to rent one of the reserved units under the City's proposed criteria {where the household income would be equal to or less than E20,800, which is BOX of EZF ,000, the current area median S ncome). Interestingly, however, almost 22X of our tenants have incomes in excess of E40,000/year. Mayor Jon D. Mikels May 9, 1965 Page 3 In comparison, the median income for our conventionally financed Sunscape Nest project is E27,100/ year, E2 ,830 lower than for the newer Parkview Place. Clearly, the requf red reservation of units in Parkview Place has not reduced its value to renters who do not qualify for those units. As a large landowner in the community, we are vitally concerned about any program which might have a negative impact on our community. We will be developing Terra Vista for many years. We intend to own and manage our apartment developments as well as a large amount of commercial and office income property. We have a very large investment in the City now and we will see it continue to increase. Conseeuently, we would be foolish to request adoption of any program that will negatively impact our house sales. We have carefully studied and reviewed this program ar.d feel it will be a tremendous benefit to the City. Ne believe it can complement the very successful single-family program already in place in the City. During the last City Council meeting, there was a brief discussion regarding the State's allocation procedures and the need to proceed quickly in order to be able to take advantage of the probable raising of the State ceiling on multifamily financfng. Currently, the annual ceiling of E900 million is exhausted. It is antfcipated that proDOSed legislation to increase the ceiling will 6e signed into law by mid-June, at the latest. It is believed by most experts that the increased ceiling will also 6e exhausted within several weeks of taking effect. If such events occur, prompt action will be required for the City to take advantage of this program in 1985. We have two Droj ects ready to proceed and would be pleased to work with the staff in an initial program. Tn conclusion, we feel that this program would be a positive one for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It will help expand the City's stock of rental housing and wilt not have any negative impacts on the neighborhoods in which the projects are located or on the City as a whole. Ver~y~1tr~uly yours, Ralph M. Lewis Chairman of the Board JMG:MER;kr:05011 cc: Mayor Jon D. Mikels Superior Court Annex Building 1010 West Sixth Street Ontario, CA 91762 ~amFS S. ilauis, Esq. ATTORNEY AT LAW 8350 ArcblbalE Avenue Suite 211 aancbo Cucamon~a,CA 91730 p1g9877900 Planning Caanission February 12, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd. Suite C Rancho Cucanenga, Ca. 91730 Subject: Video Zone, Sign Application A84-61 Gentleren: 113e purpose of this letter is two fold, first to register my calplaint against for failing to notify me of an adverse decision affecting my client, Video Zone, in titre to allow me to file an appeal of a sign application decision. Sernndly, to request a determination try the Planning Camdssion in regards to in their opinion the lighting fixture currently illuminating the window at Video Zone's Rancho Cucamonga store cronsitutes a sign and therefore requires a application pursuant to the city ordinance. Vfien first Mr. Richards first contacted my client, Video Zone and it's owner, Phil Goodman, to advise him that in the city's rmini nn tho l;nhr; nn ;n the window constituted a sign and therefore required a application Mr Goa3cren contacted me and asked me to handle the matter. I cvlpleted the sign application for Mr. Goodman and personally hand carried it to Mr. Richazds, gave him the application and my card and asked him to direct any further crortnuications to my office as I was handling the matter. Unbeknownst to rte an adverse decision was rendered and notification was sent to the client without a copy being forwards3 to my office. In that I had told Mr. Goodman that the city would 6e in touch with rte and I would handle the matter, he did not forward the letter to rte. After the 10 day appeal period set by city had elasped, Mr. Richards went out to the Video Zone store and cited then for the alleged violation of the city ordinance and issued a ceasa3 and deceit order concerning the lighting. Upon being cited, Mr. Goodman contacted me to ascertain why he has been cited when an appeal should have been filed, which was my first notice that a denial had been issued by the city. I contacts3 Mr. Richazds, reminded him of the conversation that he and I had had concerning the application and asked him why he did not send me a copy. He acknowledged the conversation; found my business card stapled to the inside of his Folder and showad me on the letter that indeed I was not a recipient thereof but stats3 that as far as he was concerned he was required to send it to the applicant and not to myself. .. i' J Page two February 12, 1985 I explained the situation to him at which Lime he spoke to sa~eone else tdno again denial to accept the appeal. Mr. Richards, two days later, cane to my office to return the appeal and the letter fcan the city planner stating that bassi on city ordinance and information he had received from the city prosecutor, they were not going to accept the appeal. I wntacted the city prosecutor, told him what happened, the city prosecutor advissl me that he had not bens given the full story and that in his opinion the appeal should have been accepted. 1 was later advised by the city prosecutor that he had made that recommendation to Mr. Richards but Mt. Richazds had r=fuse to follow it. bty FK~ pion on this is that_ i had taken the time to talk tc Mr. Richazds in person and fully advised him of my duties in regards to this matter. This place3 a burden on Mr. Richards to, if nothing else, at least advise me of the denial so that I could enter a timely appeal. Ttie date of the appeal running should have been the date that I received notice and not the date that Mr. Richards sent the letter to the Video Zone. I might add that under California Statutory Iaw any notice sent by mail is auromatically given a five (5) day extension for service by mail. 'fhe letter Mr. Richards sei,t was dated the 15th of January, adding five days that would have been the ZOth, the 10th day for Che appeal would have been the 30th and yet Mr. Richards issue] the citation on the 30th which was still within the ten day appeal period. I would request that my appeal to the denial of the sign application be considered tidy and processed accordingly. In regards to the sernnd matter, I have done extensive research concerning the city sign ordinance, the interpretation of the term sicLn by the California courts, and the authority of the City to issue such ordinance as set forth in the California Government Code. No where have I been able to find any authority on the part of the City to govern interior lighting of a building under a sign ordinance. The word sign as defined by West California Nbrds and Phrases includes all manner of itaas such as placards, billboards and other forms of informational printed medium. Ftawever, nowhere is the interior lighting considered to be a sign. There is authority on the part o.`. the City to issue cease and desist orders for any lighting that either resembles an official traffic control device or is so distracting to nntorists on a highway so as to create a traffic hazard haw~ver, that is not the situation in this case. 5''~' Page three February 12, 1985 Mr. Richazds interpretation is that if the lighting ran he seen Erom the outside it constitutes a sign and therefore falls under the sign ordinance. This is obviously an untenable position on the part of Mr. Richazds in that it would require a sign application to be submitted for any comercial building in the City of Rancho Ncamonga in which the lights inside the building can be seen from the outside. Mr. Richazds went on to advise Video zone that because the lights were in a line and were used to attract att_ntion they constituted a sign. Once again this is an untenable position in that any time lights are on in the building it is an in3ication that the business is open and therefore is attracting the attention of potential customers. A perfect example of this situation is the Bob's Big Boy Restaurant across the street from the Video zone's location. It has lighting both inside an3 outside that can 6e seen from the roadway and is on during the time that the business is in operation. Consequently that would fall under Mr. Richards interpretation of the sign ordinance. It is obvious that the sign ordinance as it relates to lighting is void for vagueness, is an unconstitutional restriction on freedan of amrercial expression and is unenforceable in that reasonable men might differ as to its meaning and intent. It should be pointed out that the lights are inside the window of the Video Zone, they do not flash nor do they mart any other message, slogan, symbol or any other information to the public other than the fact that the store is open and available for business. lastly it is well established in California that a ordinance controlling commercial expression cannot be based strictly on esthetic principals but nn~st have some underlying justification such as public safety. Therefore I am requesting that the planning cannission review the ordinance and its applicability if any to the window lighting at the Video zone location and prior to February 28 which is the date set for the appearance on the citation and advise ne of whether or not (1) the lighting requires a sign application to be submitted in the first place and (2) whether or not the sign ordinance itself is overly bred in this application to interior lighting visible from the outside. Please direct your response and any further comwnications to my office and feel free to call me iE you have any questions. Sincerely, ,flames S. Davis JSD/dm cc: Gary Richards David Cattnichael Video 7.one ). ~11111iE~~7115 INTER~O FFICE MEMO DATE: September 28, 1984 T0: Members of CMNITRANS Board of OT rec tors FROM: Marren A. Knudson, OMNI TRANS Controller SUBJECT: OIOiITRANS Board Mei ghted Vote Board action on May 4, 1983, requt red that the weigh ted vote cal- culation be based upon POPULATION within a two year period. To com- ply with the stated Board action, a new calculation of the weighted vote has been made. Attached is a schedule comparing the new calculation to the most recent weighted vote calculation (population/assets). Below is the proposed weighted vote by Jurisdiction: San Bernardino County 22 Chino 6 Colton 3 Fontana 6 Grand Terrace 1 Loma Linda 1 Montclair 3 Ontario 13 Rancho Cucamona 8 Redlands 6 Rialto 6 San Bernardino Ctty 17 Upland 7 Tote) loo Marren A. Knudson OMNITRANS Controller MAK:rw Attachment 1700 WEST 8TH STREET •SAN RE RNARDINO,CALIFORNIA 87411~TE LERHONE 07418890811 ~i y o ~~,~; o °' ~ OON~FaW{C n~ N~~ ~(~1 ({1 ~-100(~t{O nl>N~M uyyyy y w 7~7 D e ~yHp ~Zp N NOD tn~D N.KMMW`~~NN q O N ti r-1 ~~> p~0 I'I OHO Q+N~N40{f{l !-O~~ O fV ~'q Cp m XLLS'. O q~x ~izac.-~~~ M~cn v~~ ~.a ~~ fSN? NN ~~ Q U .7 ~~s~~~~~~~~~ ~C y 41 ~~ y ~ N y ~\ G~ u~ y ~ d ` ~p ~1 ~ (4Q~' 4CC ~ V u O~ ~~~ .~ , ~~ U ~~~yy MN N.+~WS+~LL\.1aN~tn a0 2 AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITIES OF CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO ANb UPLAND CREATING A COUN^'YWIDE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO BE KNOWN AS "OMNITRANS" THZS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, dated for corv en fence on the 1st day of October, 1984, is entered into by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BE RNARDINO and the CITIES of CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO and UPLAND, all of which are bodies politic in the State of California. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the parties forming OMNITRANS, a joint powers authority, desire to amend the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement to provide for changes to the calculation of weighted vote entitlements of membec agencies of vi~iN lTRi+ivS; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement agree as follows: 1. Section 3.B. of the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement dated March 8, 1976 is hereby amended, effective upon approval of this Amendment by all member agencies of OMNITRANS, to read as follows: "Section 3.B. Voting. Each member of the Board of Directors shall have one vote, provided, however, that upon the call of any Board member, a weighted voting shall be used with weighted votes calculated as follows: Weighted vote entitlements shall be calculated based upon population. Each member agency shall receive one vole for each one percent (18) of the total population of the OMNITRANS service area that resides within the member agency's jurisdictional Page 1 of 5 area. If the population percentage computation of a member agency results in a partial vote, the weighted vote calculation shall be made by rounding upward for population calculations of one-half percent (1/28) or more, and rounding downward for population calculations of less than one-half percent (1/28) except that no member agency shall have less than one vote when weighted voting occurs. The Controller shall compute the weighted vote entitlement for each member agency as of the preceding July 1st based on the most recent Department of Finance Population Statements. The entitlement for the County of San Bernardino shall be determined by utilizing the most recent County Planning Department information indicating the percentage of unincorporated population of the County residing within the service area of Omni tr ans. In the event that the "off the ton" funding method first approved by the Omnitrans Board of Directors foe the 1983-84 fiscal year is no longer used by Omnitrans, then weighted voting entitlements shall thereafter be calculated in the manner that existed prior to this Amendment to the Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement. Weighted vote entitlements of each member agency shall be computed by the Controller designated in Section 3.0. of this agreement and such computations will control in determining weighted votes. The weighted votes to which the County ie entitled shall be divided equally among those Supervisors present. The weighted votes of eny single representative shall not be split. The weighted voting of any single member agency shall not, of itself, constitute a majority vote. A quorum shall consist of a majority of the Page 2 of 5 membership of the Hoard of Directors, except that all County representatives on the Board of Directors shall be counted as one for the purpose of establishing a quocum. Less than a quocum may adjourn from time to time. All actions taken by the Board shall require a majority vote of the members present, with a quorum in attendance, provided, however, that adoption of By-laws, Amendment of By-laws, adoption of an annual budget and such other matters as the Board may designate shall [squire a majority vote of the enti[e membership of the Board (majority of Cotal weighted votes of all parties if weighted voting is called fo[). An abstention shall be considered neither an affirmative nor a negative vote, but the presence of the member abstaining shall be counted in dete[mining whekhe[ oc noC there is a quorum in attendance." 2. All other provisions of the Omnitrans Joint Fnwers Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement Amendment to be executed and attested by their proper o£ficecs thereunto duly authorized as of the date and year first above written. Dated: ATTEST: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Clerk of the Board Dated: ATTEST: Chai[man, Boa[ of Supervisors CITY OF CHINO City Clerk Mayor Page 3 of 5 Dated: ~~ ~ A`y ATT~FST: A f~t~ City Clerk CITY/OF CO^LTO/N /~ aYoc C~...+ 2a ~y Ps C y OF FONTANA Dated: _~,---- /1_ ~ ~~y~UV~ TT ~' ,,,, n~ii1. 0,`n'i7-7iI13•"u~,`'Mayo[ ity Clerk L~"`~U~ Dated: ATTEST: 'yam. L M~-~' City Clerk CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Ma oc Dated: Februa 12, 1985 AST: ~/~ ~ l ~a '~' City Clerk (?'pucy) CITY OF LOMA LINDA ~ ~ Mayor ~ 5 CITY OF MONTCLAIR Datedr~ -' _ / A :'r~, , .. ~.,~ / ..~~ _---Mayor City Clerk ,~ i~ CITY OF ONTARIO Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayo[ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk page q of 5 Dated: ~~-,S g's ATTES~"> City ~ e~.~ -~ Dated: ~G .~ ATTE ~ Cit Cle k Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ~ CITY OF REDLANDS ~U ~~~ Mayor CITY OF RIALTO ~/~/ ~ C~ / T Mayor CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO Page 5 of 5 ZYIRDINC REQUESTED BP WREN RECORDED MAIL TO Robert E. Sm.i.th 12972 V.ictoA.<a S{. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9I 739 SPACE ABOVF TNIS LIB"JS FO,q AECORDER'8 USE_ NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SEC1,Cq tTv rNTEREST IN TIlF, PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT OT AND OF LOWER PRIORITY T9F LIRN OF SOME OTNF.R OR LATER SECURITY INSTRU,'4ENT. ,SUBORDINATION AGAEERIENT Th'7S AG,REFAfFNT, made this 15.th day of May i3 85 by RobeA,t E. Sn.i.th and Teeny J. Ludwig owner of the land hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "OWNER," and C.i,ty o(, Rancho Cucamonaa Present armer and ho Zder of the deed of trust and note first %:cn-+'r.:ft~r described and hsrv_inafter referred to as "gene ft:ciary;" WT. NE^,^,ElN THAT NAEAEAS. Robert E. Sm.i,th and 7elvty J. Ludw.i.g did es.-cu+r .i Aced of trus t, dated November il, 1984 fo C.i.ty ob Rancho Cucamonga a^ tr^~stoe rm+~r`+:n Pance4 1 05 ParteeX Nap No, 1893 as pen. p4at rteaortded .in book i&, page Il ao PanceP Napa, o66.ici,aE rtecartda. Lo secure a note in the swn of S not d¢a.igna.ted ,dated November Ii, 1984 in favor of the C.itiJ of Rancho Cuemnon a which deed of trust was recorded November ib, 1984 i.n Book . page Zee numenf M84-176;1; ,Official Recoric of mid ccunty; and WIIEREA,S, Owner has executed, or is about to execute a contract of sale to Department of Vetorana Affairs of the State of Ca Zifornin in the staa of S 75 D00. 00 .dated in faovor of THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, hereinafter refrrnad to as "Lender," payab Ze with interact and upon the terms and conditions deaeribrd thnrai n, wh i.ch contract is to ba mcorded concurrently herewith; and WHEREAS, it is a condition preced¢nt to abtairsing said Zoan that eaid contract Last above mentioned shall uneondi,tianatly be and remain at all times a Zien or charge upon the Land hareinbefare described, prior and superior to the Lien or charge. of the deed of trust, firm above, mentiond; and -~ .- - .~. ANEREAS, Lender is viZLi.ng to make said Loan protrid¢d the aontrort encoring the scone is a Lien or charge upon the above described property prior and supemor to the Ltien or charge of the deed of tn~st first erbove mentioned and provided that 8enefici.ary will apeci.ficevLLy and rmcanditirmally subordinate the Lien or charge of the deed of Ernst first above mentioned to the Zien or charge of thr rontmrt in favor of Lender; and WXEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender make cosh Zoan to LLmer; and Beneficiary is urillirtq Ehat the rnntmet seruvdno tkr. same sha1L, w5¢n recorded, rrortstitulr a Li¢n ar elrarg¢ apart said Land ti~~,•it .r. uncan- dv:tionaLiy prior and auperwr to the Lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned. AOW, TAEAEPORE, in cona{d¢mtion of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties hereto and other valuab Ze considemtion, the receipt and sufficiency of which can- aideratson {a hereby ackrowledged, and in order to induce Lender to make the Zoan above referrd to, it {s hereby declared, carders toad and agreed as follows: 1. That said c»ntrnet securing eai.d note £n favor of Lender, and arty renewals or astansiona thereof shall uncrondi tionat Zy be and remain at atl times a Zien or charge art the propertu therein da: r. ribcd, prior mvd aup¢rior to the Zien nr charge of the deed of trust first abowr mentioned. 2. 77rnt G;vvler woo Zd net make van loan above discri.F.•d a+'!hmr} h+is sub- ordination agreement. 3. That this ggrnement slue tl he the whole and only ,rpr~•rm n! r.+i th regard to the subordination of the Zien or change of the deed of trust first above mentioned to the lien ar charge of the eontrrvct in favor of Lender above refermd to and shall supersede and troves Z, but art Zy insofar as would affect the priority between the dyad of trust and crontract herein- before specifically described, any prior agreement, as to such subordination, tine Zuding, but not Zimi ted to, those provisions, if any, contained in the decd of trueL first above mentioned, which provide for the subordination of the Zien or charge Lhereef to awther deed or deeds of trust or to another mortgage or mortgages. Beneficiary declares, agrees, and acknoZedgaa that: (al Xe consents to and approves fi) sit proviaiona of the eon trttct in fm~or of Lender above referred to, and (ii) all ngrvemente, including, but not Zuni ted to, any loan or eaera.+ agreements, bs tr.M,rn Q.mer and Lander for the disbura¢ment of the proceeds of Lender's Loan; (61 tfe intentionaZZy and unconditionally waives, ret±nouishea and aub- orrtinatea the Zfers or charge of the deed of truer fi,ret above mentioned in favor of the Zien or charge upon said Zand of Eha contract in favor of Lender above referred to and undervtanda thaE in reliance upon, and in consideration of, this uwi.ver, relinquishment, and aubotd{nation Fr: speeifio Loans and advanaae are being and ui.Lt be made and, as part and paroeL 6hereof, specific monetary and other abtipationa era being +;' Ir r ~ and tsi.lZ be entered into which wou Zd not be made on entered into but for said reliance upon this Waiver, rs Littnuiahment and aub- ordination; and (Q) An endorsement has been placed upon the note ssctuwd by the deed of trust first above mentioned that said deed of trust h¢a by this inatnmtent bern subordinated to the Lirn er charge of the contract in favor of Lender above referred tn. Ot/IVER(S1 2 ~t `'-- ~-~- Robent E. Smith T¢nny I / L~(dwtg 'J Lender's Amne (a/ (PZeare Print) C.i.h) o o uomnonga ATTEST- Bever y uthe et City Clerk signattJre Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ;Tartu tore ,Sa:7naturw °UNLY GENUERrB SINCATURELS) TO BS NOTAR72ED" INDIVIDUAL ACXNOWLEOOMENT STATE OP CALIFORflIA ) as COUNTY OF ~A~n ~r»r~cb~~,~~. .~ . ~ On r~?i..t i~, 'i` 5 be fors ma, .. `~ ~ ~ T the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, persona Zly appeared C Jn j - .~~ to me to ba the pe on S Whose ncanez t7.~~ subscribed to the Within instru- ment, and aeknaWLedoed to me that ~~ he. executed the amrte. NITNESS my hand and Official Seal. OFFICW, SeAL 9everly Ann Au•h^let NOTARY ppe ~~ C/1W lMUA NOLAgt BONO FI1CD T fNN eDRNMDINO COUryry ~ t~0111.IpN11 Wlm JnIwN L Ip) ~ .~ ~_ Ibtcry Publ a in and for Said County and State May 15, 19X5 CITY OF AAN CHO CUCAMUNGA CITY COUNCIL NINUTES Re¢u tar Heetia¢ 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular mee[i ng of the Ci[y Council of Che City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, Hay 15, 1985, in [he Lionn Park Community Center, 9161 Baee Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called [o order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Nike le. Present were Councilmembe ra: Pamela J. Wright, Charles J. Huq uet II, Richard M. Dahl, Jetfzey King, and Mayor a D. Mike Le. Aleo pzesent were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wa seerman; City Clezk, Beverly A. Authele[; City Attorney, James Markman; Aseietant [o the Cify Mena gar, Robert Rizzo; Community Development Director ,. Jack Lam; City Planner, Rick Gomez; City Engineer, Lloyd Rubbe; Community Services -irect or, Bili Nol ley. Approv el of Minutes: Moved by Dahl, ee conded by Wright co approve the minutes of May 1 and Hay 3, 1985, ae prev ioue ly amended. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ~ + ~ + x ~ 2. ANNOONCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS 2A. Thursday, Hay 16, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - PARR DEVELOPNENT COMMISSION, Lione Park Community Center. 28. Thur edgy, May 23, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - ADYISORY COl4fISS ION, Lione Perk Commu- nity Center 2C. Councilvomeo Wright announced she would be hoe ting a Coffee Nour for [he community on Tue edey, May 21, from 6:30 Co 9:30 p.m. at the Lione Park Communi- ty Center. 2D. Mr. Waeae rman annouoced that staff report items 6E was to 6e deleted from [he agenda which was requested by Mr. Scott. 2E. Mr. Wasserman requested the fol law ing edditi one [o the Ageoda: 3R. Aopeel of Plennin¢ Comm ieeion Dec ieion - Porecaet 75. Aoorovel of a Subord ina[ion Agreement for 12972 Victoria Avenue. sub- mitted by Robert Smith. 6F. Funding of Omnitrane • ~ ~ + + + 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 7A. Approval of Warrecte, Re gia[er No's. 85-OS-15 and Payroll ending 04/28/X$ for the total amount of $577,345.59. City Council Hinut ee Hay 15, 1985 Page 2 (1) 3B. Release of Banda: Parcel Mao 7891 - Loce led on [he south aide of Foo[6 ill Houlev ard, east of Turner Avenue; owner, Be rhert Hawkins Company, inc. Faithful Performance Bond $41,000.00 (?) 3C. Approval to release original Faithful Performance Bond avd accept reduced Fai [hf ul Performance Bond far Tr ac[ 9539 far completion of three drive appr oa chee and removal of per kw ay fence. (Plaza Huildete) Release: Original Faithful Performance Bond $92,900.00 Accept: Reduced Faithful Pert ormance Bond $ 2,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 9,290.00 (3) 3D. Approval to release Real Properly Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement , Contract from For seas[ Hor tga ge Corpora ti on for DR 84-44. RESOLUTION N0. 85-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN CRO CU CAHONGA, CAL IFORN LA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IM- PROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FORECAST MORTGAGE CORPORATION FOR OR 84-44 (4) 3E. Approval of Service Connection Electrical Unde rgr ounding for Underground (5) Utility Dis tric[ No. 2, !u'chi bald Avenue be [wean Church Str eel and Base Line Road 6eve been comple led [o [he ea Lief acti on of the City Engineer. I[ ie rec- ommended the[ the City Couv cil approve acceptance of the project end authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion xith the County Recorder. (Dew co Contractors) Relee se: Performance Surety $16,520.00 Retention $ 1,659.00 RES OLOTION N0. 85-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIPOHN IA, ACCEPTING $E PUBLIC IHPROVElIENTS FOR SERVICE CONNECTION ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUNDINC POA UNDERGROUND UmTLrmy BLS ~ ....nw TnE FiL T;:G vi A riv- TICE OP CONPLETIONVFOR TIIR NORKV~ (6) 3F. Approval o£ join[ agreement be [wean the City of Rancho Cucamonga end the Cucamonga Couv [y Na ter Di et ri ct (CO 85-48) for the combined conetru ctiov of Arch ibeld Avenue Trunk Sever and the Archibald Avenue Overlay (FAU). The joint prof ec[ ie ee[ima led to result in a eevinge of about $175,000 for each agency by sharing [he coat of pavement removal and replacement in th nee areas where the pipelines will be construe [ed. (7) 3G. Approval [o authorize the implements ti on of the Special Ae easement Revenue Management Program. (8) 3H. Approval [o authorize funding of building improvements in the amouv[ of $10,500.00 to Youag Construction (CO 85-49) for office space lose tad at 9360 Baeelive Road, Unit "C", to be utilized by the public xor ke inspection staff. (9) 3I. Approval to authorize av Equity Adj ue tment in the Plan Cbecker Salary Range. (10) 3J. Approval of re of ica ti on of two agreements establishing cov enavte running with the lend in connection with the Hunt Club Anne za ti on. (CO BS-50) City Councit Minutes Nay 15, 1985 Page 3 3R. Approval to authorize Nay or to sign eta [amen[ granting the Trails End Di s- (ll) trio Boy Scouts (CO 85-51) pe [mi~~i on to use [he City logo foz purposes of ad- vertising Mnual Boy Scout Jamboree. 3L. Set public hearing for June 5, 1985 Eor Enviro~ental Assesemevt and De- (12) vel oilmen[ Districts Amendment 85-05, City of Rancho Cucamonga 3N. See public bearing for June 5, 1985 for Final EIR and Appeal of Planning (13) Commisaiov'e decision denying General Plan Amendment 84-03-A, RAH Inveetmenta. 3N. Set public bearing for June 5, 1985 for In;ant to annex Tract Noe. 17365, (14) 12590-1 thru 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Commmity) ae Mneza ti on No. 1. RESOLUTION N0. 85-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TEE CITY OF RANCFI0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PR ELIHINAHY APPROVAL OF CITY ENCI- NEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEBATION N0. 1 TO LANDS GPE MAIN TENAN CE DIS THICT N0. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED CONMt1NITY) RESOLUTION NO. 85-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RAN CRO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPOAN IA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER 1NE ANNEEATION 1I1 LAN DS GPE NA INTENAN CE DISTRICT N0. 4, AN AS- SESS!ffiNT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEEATION AS ANNEIlA- TION N0. 1 TO LAN DSGPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4; PURSU- ANT TO THE LAN DSGPING AND LIGNTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPFERING A TIME AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 30. Bet public hearing £or Jme 5, 1985 for Intent to annez Tract Nos. 12365, (15) 12590-1 thru 6 [0 9[reet Lighting Naiatenavice Diatr ict No. 4 (Terra Vie [e Planned Coammity) as Mne za ti on Nv. 1 . RESOLUTION N0. 85-144 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP BANCNO COGMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT POR ANNEEATION ND. 1 TO STREET LIGRT- IN/: NATN TFNAN I:e nTe TO TrT un_ A fTv_Eo~ PIa TA m!„PED ^_DtiML'HI- TY) RESOLUTION NO. 85-145 A RESOLDTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP BAN CBO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER 1HE ANNETATION TO STREET LICRTING i1AINT8NAN CE DISTRICT N0. 4, Ali ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNERATION AS ANNERA- TION N0. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4; PURSOANT TO TH6 LAN DSGPING AIiD LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OP- FERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEMINC OBJECTIONS 1MERET0 3P. Bet public bearing for June 19, 1985 for Prelimive ry approval of Mnual En- (16) gineer'e Report for Lends ce pe Main Cemance District Noe. 1, 2, 4 and 5 [o levy and collect eseeeemente. RESOLUTION N0. 85-146 A RESOLUTION OP TEE CITY COUNCIL OP TIIE CITY OF RAN CRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGI- NEER'S ANNUAL REPORT POR LAN D9 GPE MAINTeNANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, LAN DSGPE MAINTENANCE DIRTRICT N0. 2, LAN DS GPE MAINTE- NANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND LAN DS GPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 City Couucil Minutes May 15, 1985 Page 4 RESOLDTION NO. 85-147 A RHNOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OP RAN(90 CDGNONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLAEING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS NITR LANDSGPB MAINTHNAN CE DISTRICT N0. 1, LAN DSGPE MAINTHRAN CE DIS TEICT N0. 2, LAN DS GPE MAINTE- NANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND LAN DSGPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 POH 'IDE PIS CAL YBAR 1985-86 PURSOANT TO 1HE LAN DSGPING AND LIGETING ACT OP 1972; AND OPFHRING A TINE AND PLACE POR FEARING OBJECTIONS TBERET0 (l7) 3Q. Set public hearing for June 19, 1985 for Pre limim ry approval of Aonuel En- gineer's Report for Street Ligbting Meiotemnce District Noe. 1, 2, 3 and 4 [o levy and collect assessments. NESOLUTION N0. NS-148 A RBSOLUTION OF 18E CITY COONCIL OP TBB CITY OP BAN CFO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGI- NEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR STRBHT LIGHTING MAINTffiIANCE DIS- TRICT N0. 1, STREET LIGBTING MAINTENANCE DIS TBICT N0. 2, STREET LIGETING NAINTENAN CE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGFT- ING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 85-149 A RESOLUTION OF T8E CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT AS SBSSlffJ7 T9 KITH STREET LIGHTING MAINTBNANCE DIS- TRICT N0. 1, STHBET LIGHTING MAIMT&IANCE DIH THICT NO. 2, STREET LIGNTlliG MAINTBNANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGFT- ING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 FOR 1HE FISCAL YHAH 1985-86 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSGPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972; AND OPPERLNG A TIME AND PLACE POH HEARING OBJECTIONS 7NBRET0 (18) (19) 3R. Added I[a; Se[ public hearing for June 5, 1985 for appeal of Planning Commission deciai on, denying Psrcel Nap 9084 - Porecaat Mortgage Corporation. 39. Added Item: Approval of s Subordim [i on Agreement for 12972 Victoria Ave- nue, submitted bq Robert Smith. RESOLUTION N0. 85-151 A RBSOLUTION OP TFE CITY CODNCIL OP TF6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SDBOBDINATION AGBEEMBNT PROM flOBEBT SMITiI AND A0IHORIZ ING 1HE IMYOR AND CITY CLEBR TO SIGN SAME (12972 VICTORIA Ap@i0E) NOTION: Moved by Ring, seconded by Dahl [o approve [he Consent Cel ender ae amended, Mo[i on carried uoenimaua lq 5-0. x x x x x A[ the request of Mayor Mikela and concurrence by City Council, Item 7A vas moved to [he front of the sgenda. (20) 7A. DESIGN CRITERIA - TBACT 10349. Magor Mi kale e[e tad that he simply van tad re of ice ti an of the follw ing: Architecture 1. Pa Cie and ex[eiior elevaeione city council Minutes May I5, 1985 Page 5 b. Request review of front ezt erior vindor elevation alterna tivea. c. Request rev iew of chimney de ei gn. Ro ofe a. Recommend that shake (conaie tent with regulatiane) or concrete file be required. b. Reeo®end Chet pitch and angle be reviewed. OnOn=Sitit~ Imorovementa 1. Reco®end [hat concrete dr ivevaye he required. 2. Recommend that front yard landscaping be required with: a. BOS coverage of front yard in sod, with balance in shrubs, trees, and ground corer (alternatives should be made available to new homearnere ). b. Sprinkler system required (nut ometic preferred). c. Minimum of 25 gallon trees and shrubs. 3. Recommend that homes occupy a sizable portion of the frontage width, recognizing that the lots will be rider in the Plaza Builder's trace. 4. Recommend that a minimum square footage of 2400+ 3S be required with a distribution of various sizes end elevaeiona throughout the tract. 5. Recommend [hat larger homes be boil[ adjacent to the ezieting eastern terminus of Thoroughbred Street [o transition the [vo [recta for comps [ibili ty. 6. Recommend masonry return walls rit6 cap be required. Off-Site Imorovement• I, Request concrete curb and gutter. 2. Request Chet continuation of liquid ember street trees an Thoroughbred seat to Sapphire. 3. Recommend [Est circulstion system be required [o pr w ids a minimum b5I bend in the ex[enai on of Thoroughbred Street easterly [o Sapphire, end the[ design alternatives be preemted end rev ieved by the committee, cone isfent rit6 property drainage solution. 4. Reco®end a dietiac[ eeparati oa at the io[erface of the tro [recce. MOTION: Moved bq Mikels, seconded by Da Al to ratify the above listed requize- mente for Testa tive Tract No. 10349. Notion carried unaoimoualy 5-0. + ~ + ~ a 4. ADVERTI38D PUBLIC NEAAINGS 4A. BNVIRONNeNTAL ASS833N8NT AND TERRA VISTA DEVBLOPMBNT PLAN AMBNDNENT 85-03- (2l) A requeet [o change [he lead use designs [i on from Nixed Use - Office, Commer- cial, and Residential - to Noepitel and aasociated uses for appr oaimetely 31 sores of land located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue, betreen Foo[E ill Boulevard and Church Street - APN - A portion of 227-151-13 end 14. Item con- tinued from May 1, 1985 mee [ing. Staff report by Aick Gomez, Ci[y Planner. City Council Ninutea Hey 15, 1985 Page 6 Mr. Gomez recommended continuance of this item to the second meeting in June, after the Planning Commieei on bee had i[e review. Hayor Mikele opened the mee[ivg for public hearing. There being vo response, the Mayor closed the public hearing. City Attorney, Jmee Markman, eummnrized hie letter which had prey iously been submitted to Council. Mayor Mikele opened the meeting for public hearing again. Addr ee sing Council was: Rey Matlock, of Levis Homes, stated it wasn't their intention to force le- verage on anyone, but she agreed this should be looked at ae an entire package. They xould like to have [he matter continued until [hat occurs. ~ There being no further response, Hayor Mikele cl Deed the public beer ing. NOTION: Moved 6y Da61, seconded by Wright to continue the item to June 19, 1985. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ORDINANCE N0. 261 (second reeding - continued) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REDES IGNATINC ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUM- BERS 227-151-13 AND 14 IiITHIN THE THRAA VISTA PLANNHD COMMU- NITY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIREN AVENGE, BETWEEN FOOTRILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCE STREET PROM HIRED OSE - OP- PICE, COMMERCIAL, AND RBBIDENTIAL TO HOSPITAL AND RELATED FACILITIES x * * w w : (22) 48. APPEAL OP PLANNING COMMISSION OP SIGN ORDINANCE INTERPRETATION VIDHO 20NE- M appeal of [he Planning Commts snon • decision to reaffirm staff's in- Cerpretntion of the Sign Ordinance regarding the placement of lights in [he xindowe of the Video Zone. Staff report by Gary Richards, Code Enforcement Of- ficer. Councilman Ring stated [hat in the definition of a sign, the phrase "in a xin- deww =ppc: r:. Ha :: 2u' hc. ids admor ed dwcn n nigu have [o be tram a window [o be considered not in~the windovT Rick Gome¢ eta tad [he quee[i oa, in t6 i• case, was regarding a string of lights. If the eiga w• adjacent [o the window, Plamning staff would have to interpret it ne a eiga. Nr. Markman, City Attorney, eta tad [ha[ if you read further in the Code, it stated that nay sign placed near a window which attracts business ie a sign. 4layor Mikele opened the meeting for public hearing. There being ao ree ponce, the public hearing xae closed. Mayor Mikele asked if the applicant, or nay repreeentetive was present. No an- ever. MOTION: Moved by Dnhl, seconded Ring, [o deny the appeal. Motion carried unanimous ly 5-0. • ~ • * x w City Council Minutes May 15, 1985 Page 7 NOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded Ring, [o deny the appeal. Mo[ioo carried unanimously 5-0. w w w w a x 4C, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AHENDNENT 85-04 - OVENS- (23) A request to emend the Development Dietri cts Hap from "L^ (LOV Denei [y Reeiden^ ti al) to "IS P" (Indus trial Specific Plan) - Industrial Perk for 2.5 acres of land located on the eou[heeet corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-062-01 asd 02. Staff report by Otto Rroutil, Senior Planner. Mayor Mikele opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public 6eari ng was closed. City Clerk Au[hele[ read title of Ordinance No. 262. ORDINANCE N0. 262 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP BANCNO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPflOVING DEVELOPMENT DIS IEICT AMEND- MENT BS-04 AMENDING 'IDE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAP FROM 'T." TO "ISP" POR 2.5 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON 1NE SOU 1}IEAST CORNER OF ARCM IEALD AND MAIN - APN 209-062-01 and 02 NOTION: Nov ed by Ring, seconded by Buque [, co waive full reading of Ordinance No. 262. Moti as carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Mikele set second reeding for June 5, 1985. + r w : w 5. NON-ADVENTISED HEASINGS 9A. ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE PINANC ING OP INTERIM SCEOOL FACILITIES - Pur- (24) pose of amendment is to ezc lode Senior Citireo hone ing Frem the school require- ments. Item continued from Nay 1, 1985 meeting. Staff report preaeated by Lour eo Naeeetmao, City 14nager. Mayor Mikele opened the meeting for public 6eering. Addrea ei og Council roe: Linda Ecc~an frs, thz EizLiauder NNepeper, ate tea she did not understand whet the single fem ily dwelling unite were; ree ch is sn old tract of hous- ing for financing; and why rare seniors e:empt7 Mayor Mikele responded that this scti on could pertain only to Senior Ci titan dwel lingo since they would not be genera [ing children into the school systems. Therefore, they could ezc lode [hem from paying fees for ecboole. Terry Chriatianeeo, 7373 Nellman, developer, stated that without reiving the school fees, it would create eztremely high rents foz aeni or e. There bei ag no further ree poaee from the public, Mayor Hike le closed the public hearing. Councilromam Wright asked if the Alta Lome School District had been notified of this. Mr. Gomez, City Planner, eta tad that Chey had. City Clerk Auth ale[ read the ti ale of Ordinance No. 30-A. ORDINANCE N0. 30-A (ae cond reeding) AN ORDINANCE OP TIIE CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RAN CRO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 30 OP TN IS COUNCIL REGARDING FINANCING OF INTERIM SCNOOL FACILITIES City Coancil Minu[ea May 15, 1985 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Dahl, ee co nded by Buque t, to vaive full reeding. Notion car- ried unanimously 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Nri gh [, ee conded by Ring, to approve Ordi nonce 30-A. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. f * * * * * (25) SB. Deer. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbe, City Mayor Mike le opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no ree ponse, the public hearing vas cl Deed. City Clerk Authel et read the title of Ordinance No. 263. 1 ORDINANCE N0. 263 (firs[ reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPOBN IA, AUIHOHIZ ING 1HE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TA% IN A COMMUNITY PACILITIBS DISTRICT NOTION: Nwed by Buque t, ee conded by Dahl, to vaive full reeding of Ordinance Na. 263. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Mike le net second reading for Juue 5, 1985. * * * * * * b. CITY MANAGER'S STAPF REPORTS (26) 6A. _S_TATUS HHPOHT ON A936SSMENT DISTRICT 84-2 (ALTA LOMA PLOOD CONTROL PHOJ- HCT S[eff report presented Dy Lauren Naeeermen, City lLnager. Mayor Nike le opened [be meeting for public hearing. there Deing no response, [he public hearing roe closed. City Clerk Au[hele[ read the title of flesoluti oo No. 85-150. HBSOLUTION P0. BS-150 A RESOLOTION OP TBB CITY COUNCIL OP TBB CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CAL IF08N IA, ACCEPTING PHOP(15AL AND HARING ANABD FOB SALE OP BONDB, AND P&OVIDING POR 1HE ESTAHLISBNBNT OP A HEDSMPTION FUND POH THE PAYNHNT OP SAID BONDS MOTION: Moved by Dahl, eecomded by Dahl [o approved Hesoluti on No. 85-150. No[i on ce cried unanimously S-0. * * : * * * (27) 6B. ESTABLISHMENT OF VECTOR CONTROL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT.. Staff report by Lauren Nee mermen, City Manager. Mayor Mike le opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council roe: Kathy Nhea tl ey eta tad [hey you ld like to have fhe whole city on a contiguous beeia, which meant to her our entire city up to the boundary line of [he ocher atte thing district. Ren Jeeke, from 9eo Bernsrdino County, vas present end eoerered qua eti one by the Council. City Couv cil Minutes May 15, 1985 Page 9 Mr. Wasserman requested this item be continued [o the ne:t meeting for further invee[iga tioo. Councilwoman Wright asked what interim methods would be used [o help eliminate [he problem iE thin vas deferred. Mr. Was Berman explained Che County vas still in control and would be available one interim basis. Discussion continued ae [o methods that could be used on an interim ba sie to help elimive to the problem, such as using the Crapev ins to get the message out. Willard Nauet ezplained some of the methods that could be need. There being no further public comment, Mayor Mike la cl oaed the public meeting. ACTION: Council referred the mailer to staff for iweetigati on and to come back at [he next meeting with further options. • a R Mayor Mike le called a recess at 9:10 p.m. The meeting recowened at 9:40 p.m. with all councilmembere present. + + + • x x w••,t: 6C. MDLTIPLE PANILY RENTAL NOOSING MORTGAGE PINANCE PROGRAM. Staff report by (28) Linda Denis le, Redevelopment Malyet. Mayor Mike le opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council were: Sack Peehan, Vice President of Lincoln Properties and developer of a pro- posed apartment complez at Maven A Arrow, elated that without bond financing their property map could not be feasible. John Goodmsn, Levin Rwea, e:pres ^ed he ranted this progrm continued in the City. They vented to be a participant in the multiple family program. Leou Ovens, developer of [he project a[ 8th A Grwe, stated they weeded co- operation agreements in order [o get the bond financing. They would not be in the RDA area, so could not use RDA financing. Tames Benke, Etivanda resident, ezpreased [hat Rancho Cucamonga has done more Chan its share in aba orbing apsrtmenta. He encouraged Council not [o help the big developers finance apartment complezes. Thelma Moore, from [he Comty, stated Chet some funds came from the federal gwer~ent and that the county needed to put in these requirements regard- ing rents, etc. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Mike le cloned the public por [ion of Che meeting. MOTION: Moved by Euquet, seconded by Dehl to approve the City of Rancho Cucamonga entering into a Cooperative Agreement for the project at 8th A Grwe, and co proceed with the projects oov under the County requi cements for Che two Levis pr of acts and the Lincoln Properties project. Motion carried es follows: AYES: Buque t, Dehl, Ring NOES: Wright, Nike le NOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Wright, to instruct staff [o proceed with the 1985 TAC Developsent City-apansored pr ogrem far multi-few ily housing for senior citizens. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes May 15, 1985 Page 10 • + x + < (29) Jack Lam, Community Development Director, stated [here rare tro remaining ie- suea to be resolved. Ne nw have a aeries of pr of seta submitted under the City program, and they rould like to request permission to proceed to develop Chie ae a single family program in order to get the fee study done rhich will be done at the developer's co e[. Die recommendation rsa Joe Jansick. NOTION: Moved by august, seconded Dahl Co authorize staff to contact intereei- ed pazciee in a Ci[y bond program, end that they pay for the funding. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. • t t a a e (30) 6D. LAND DSE EECOMNSNDATIONS BY ADVISONY COMMISSION - Nev ier of policy recom- mendations by the Planning Co®isaion relating to the Adv ie ory Commis eion'e ~ recommends [ions on land use. Item continued from April 17, 1985 meeting. Staff report by Otto grwtil, Senior Plnnner. Mayor Mike le opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council rare: Don Beer, resident of Etiranda, stated that some of their co¢cerns rare that developers tended [o build at the upper limits of a density. It roe [heir intent that a developer pick the middle rn¢gee, not the higher ranges in developing. Ni shoal Payne, member of the BIA. Jim Banks, chairman of the Adv ivory Co®iaeioa. Jeff Sceranka, 6211 Phill ipa Nay. Steven Pord, Nil liam Lyon Company. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Nike le closed the public portion of [be meeting. NOTION: Moved by Mikela, seconded by Dahl [o direct staff to prepare Eor the City Council an analysis of those •pecif is sites in the 13-14, end 21-30 denai- tiee excluding those in development agrement•, to look e[ these and refer these to [he Planning Co®ission •¢d the Adv ivory Commiuion to formulate rec- ommendations beck fo the City Council for • finnl decision. Councilman 0v61 requee tad that we look at densi [y bonuvev also. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. • • x s t (31) 66. IEOD68T SI DIQ SCO'PI OP YOODLAlD PACIFIC FO! CLAQFICITIO! OP ISSDSS SS- LATIIG IO lODLBTlIY ZtlI1.S (Item removed at the applicant"• requee[). + x ~ ~ w (J2) 6P. ADDBD ITEM: OMNITRANS JPA MOTION: Moved by Dshl, seconded by Nr igh[ to authorize the Mayor to eig¢ the amendme¢t• [o [he Joint Pavers Authority, cha¢ging the funding formula. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. • + ~ : ~ x 6G. ADDBD ITEH: CONS IDEMTION OP A MEETING Mayor Mikele exprev sad [het re should ee[ a Goole meeting prior to adoption of the budget. Ci[y Council Minutes May 15, 1985 Page 11 Council concurred by settivg Tuesday, Sune 4, 1985, 6:00 p.m. et [he Neighbor- hood Cevter, supper to be ivcluded. • w ,! R * x 7. COONCIL EUSINESS 7A. Its mooed [o the frost of the agenda. DESIGN CRITEBIA - TBACT 10349- Thia itm has been added to the agenda at the request of Mayor Nikela in order to provide further direction to efaff and [he Planning Commission regarding the proposed tract map. • * t : k 8. ADJOURNMeNT Meeting adjourned to Priday, May 17, 1985, 7:00 p.m., public heeriug for [he Park b Recreation District, Alta Loma Sigh School Auditorium. MOTION: Nwed bq De61, seconded by Huquet, to adjourn toe closed eeaeion to recowene on Friday, Nay 17, 1985, at 7:00 p. m., at the Alta Loma Nigh School Auditorium. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 12:35 a.m. Bee pectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Approved: June 19, 1985