HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/12/21 - Agenda Packetrral
1977
CrrV DP
RA.NCHD CLC NUNCA
CITY COL .NUL
AGENM
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
December 21, 1983 - 7:30 p.m.
111 items submitted for the City Council Agenda most be in writing. The deadline
for submitting the" items 13 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The
City Clerk's Office recelvee all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDD
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
8, Roll Call: Buquet _, Dahl Frost '+ ,
• Schlosser :Y, and Mikels
_. .Approval of Minutes: November 2, 1983
2. AMUNCEHMS
a. Thursday, December 22, 1983 - ADVISORY COMMISSION
MEETING - CANrrL_ED. Next meeting, Thursday, January
12, 1984.
b. Citizens Commendation Presentations by Mayor Jon D.
Mikels and Sheriff Floyd Tidwell.
c. Presentation of Service Recognition Awards by Mayor Jon
D. Mikels.
3. CONSENT CALUD1B
The following - Consent Calendar Stems are expected to be
routine and boo- cootromers al. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without disousslon.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83- 12 -21, and Payroll
ending 11 -17 -83 for the total amount of $505,697.00.
D
Alcohol Beverage License Application for Off -Sale Beer A
Wine License for Fat Daddy's Pizza and More, Jeanette
and Richard Sheppard, 8111 Foothill Blvd, Suite A.
1
City Council Agenda -2- December 21, 1983
• a
c. Approval of Contract for Engineering and Design Services i
with Linville - Sanderson A Assoc., lowest bidder, for
pavement resurfacing and various reconstructions along
Church Street from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue.
d. Approval of Intention to Vacate north /south alley 10
located west of Center Avenue and south of 25th Street.
RESOLUTION GC. 83 -209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE NORTH /SOUTH ALLEY
LOCATED NEST OF CENTER AVENUE AND SOUTH OF
25TH STREET.
e. Approval of Parcel Map 8100, real property improvement IS
contract, lien agreement, and storm drain maintenance
agreement submitted by Farmer Jack's Nursery Lard
Company, located on the north side of Foothill
• Boulevard, west side of Ramona Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -210 16
A RESCL'JTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8100.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -211 li
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT ANU LIEN
AC °EEMENT FROM FARMER JACK'S NURSERY LAND
COMPANY FOR PARCEL MAP 8100 AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME.
f. Approval of Parcel Map 8106 submitted by Dann :G
Corporation, located on the north side of Arrow Route
between Red Oak and Utica Avenues.
RESOLUTON NO. 83 -212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
19 PARCEL MAP 8105.
:5
City Council Agenda -3- December 21, 1983
. a
g. Approval to Accept Parcel Map 7731, bonds, agreement, 37
and summarily vacation of a portion of 7th Street,
submitted by SDCiGreen Tree - Rancho.
CJ
RESOLUTION NO. 83-213
39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PAECEL MAP NO. 7731, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -214
»0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACAT *.ON OF A PORTION OF 7TH
STREET IN CONNECTION WITH PARCEL MAP 7731.
h.
Approval of a Policy establishing a Compensation Plan
i3
for employees assigned Stand -by Status during emergency
alerts and non - working hours.
• i.
Approval of revision of Personnel Rules and Regulations
45
in order to clarify benefits earned by Permanent Part -
Time Employees.
J.
Approval of Bond releases:
Tract 9658. located at the northwest oorner of Madrone
and 9th Street. Owner: Richwood Development,
Release Monument Bond $ 2,500
7lneyard Avenue Improvement Project. Owner U.S.
Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
Faithful Performance Bond $241,564,50
M.S. 77 -0517, located on Vievienda Street, west of Haven
Avenue.
Labor A Material Bond $ 5,830
CJ
City Council Agenda -4- December 21, 1983
• '%6
,P.M. 6544, located on the north sNe of 6th Street, east 48
of Haven Avenue. Owner: Solon Ent"tp saes, developer.
lease Performance Bond -'$ 30 ;"000
Acce� reduced bond 6 agree. $ 10,0
(the agr went for corrective paving om Fontana
Paving, can actor.)
RESOtKITON NO. 83-215 49
0. RESOLUTION OF TN CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING•
IMPROVEMENT AGREEME AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP N4.
k. Approval of contracts with Hilldan Associates, 50
Assessment Engineers, and Brown 8 Nazarek, Bond Counsel,
to complete p.roceduve leading to election on the
formation of a Community Facilities District to
construct Day Creek. Total amount of contracts not to
is exceed $24,500 to be f,inded with Day Creek Redevelopment
funds.
1. Set Pub' Hearing date of January %4, 1983 for the
adoption of a Development Agreement between the City of
Pancho Cucamonga and the Calmark Development Corporation
for the purposes of constructing Senior Citizen Housing
in Rancho Cucamonga.
V. ADVIKRTISED PUBLIC MWIDGS
4A. ENVIRONIB TAW AWESMWT YD =W1kL PLAN ANUWMXT B3-
046 W ZONE CRAM 83-0 - 3TCYANE IIVUffl TS. An
amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map to change the
northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line from an
Office designation to a Neighborhood Commercial
designation and to change the zone from AP
(Administrative Professional) to NC (Neighborhood
Commercial) - APN 202- 181 -27. Staff report by Rick
Gomez, City Planner.
30
City Council Agenda -5- December 21, 1983
r
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -216 73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
LAND USE POLICY OF THE ADOPTED LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
PERTAINING TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL-FACILITIES.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
ADOPTED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
ORDINANCE NO. 215 (first reading) 75
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA. AEC@MNSY9'fW REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 181 -27 FROM AP (ADMINIS-
TRATIVE PROFESSIONAL) TO NC (NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL) FOR 5.44 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY
LOCATED 04 THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE
AND ARCHIBALD.
4B. ORDER TO VACATE RAST/MSST ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH STREET AND ;A
ACACIA STREET. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City
Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C77Y
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ORDERING TO
BE VACATED THE EAST /NEST ALLEY LOCATED
BETWEEN 8TH STREET AND ACACIA STREET, HEST OF
COTTAGE AVENUE.
4C. INTERT TO CRAM RANKS OF PEPPER COURT AND PEPPER A.,
STRERT. It is recommended that the following streets
within Tract Nos. 9423 and 12184 located south of Base
Line at Beryl Street be changed: Pepper Court to
Culpepper Court and Pepper Street to Culpepper Street.
Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer.
City Council Agenda -6- December 21, 1983
RESOLUTION NO. 83-219 83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE
NAME OF PEPPER COURT AND PEPPER STREET TO
CULPEPPER COURT AND CULPEPPER STREET WITHIN
TRACT 9423 AND TRACT 12184.
5. NDN- 0TERTIZED PUBLIC HEARINGS
5A. REVISION OF BU3INM LICENSE ORDINANCE TO REMINE
DELINQUENT PERIODS AND PENALTIES TBEREOP. Starr report
by Harry E'-pey, Finance Director.
ORDINANCE NO. 21A (second reading) 88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.04.150 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTIANING TO
BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS.
SB. ORDINANCE REGULATING ICE CREAM VENDORS. Staff report by
Hobert Daugherty, City Attorney,
ORDINANCE N0. 213 (second reading) 89
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
: ALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.44.110 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING
SUBSECTION ;E) THERETO TO PROHIBIT THE SALE
OF FOOD OR BEVERAGES FROM VEHICLES OR
PUSHCARTS NEAR PUBLIC SCHOOL GROUNDS.
5C. AlEMMST TO SAIM TAI ORDINANCE. Staff report by
Robert Dougherty, City Attorney.
ORDINANCE NO. 214 (second reading) c0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.20.120 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO
SLES AND USE TAX EXCLUSIONS AND EXEMPTIONS TO
TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
City Council Agenda -7- December 21, 1983
• a
5D. ALTA LA)KA CUSS A33933MWT DISTRICT 82 -2. Recommend 91
that City Council adopt the Resolution of Intention ini-
tiating procedure to form Assessment District 82 -2 and
authorize approval of agreement with the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District to act as contract
administrator in the event of District formation. Staff
report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -221
95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF
CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH
APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE
(MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913);
DECLARING THE WORE TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL
OR ORDINARY BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT
TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
BONDS
• 6. CITY MAMAGSR'S REPORTS
6A. RLECTION MATTRRS. Staff report by Beverly Authelet, IOl
Deputy City Clerk.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -222 1n3
A RESOL'JTICN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THC CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND
G;'JING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL 'ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON
TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1984, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED RY
THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAW OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -223 1,1q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE
OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO
THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE
CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1984.
City Council Agenda -8- December 21, 1983
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -224
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO
THE CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON
TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1964.
6B, KAISER SERA. INDUSTRIAL PRBSEftK. The San Bernardino 108
County LAFC is seeking imput from Ontario, Fontana and
Rancho Cucamonga regarding the future division of the
Kaiser Steel Preserve. Staff report by flick Gomel, City
Planner.
7. CITY ATTORN"'S REPORTS
8. COUNCIL BOSIEE$4
• 9. ADJOURMRMT
u
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONI
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: Members of the Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Jack Lam, Deputy Executive Director
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ANNUAL REPORT
An Annual Report by the Redevelopment Agency is required to be completed
and forwarded to the County Auditor Controller's office and the
California State Controller's office and the Department of Housing and
Community Development pursuant to Health and Safety Code, Section
33808. As set forth in the California state law, the report shall
contain the following:
o work program for the coming year;
c Agency goals;
o Examination of previous year's activities;
o Description of activities affecting housing; and
o Independent financial audit for the previous year.
This material has been included in the attached report.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Agency direct the Executive
erector forward a copy of the annual report from the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency to the County Auditor Controller's
office, State Controller's office, and Department of Housing and
Community Development.
Respectfully omitted
—'�J ,
Jack Lam
Deputy Executive Director
JL /TJB /jr
Attachments: Annual Report
1982 -83 Audit
Health and Safety Code, Section 33808
�GlU.tip� �I
C J
z
1977
0
ANNUAL REPORT
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction
II. Activities of Previous Year 1982 -83
III. Work Program for Caning Year 1983 -84
IV. Agency Activities Affecting Housing
V. Financial Audit Fiscal Year 1982 -83 .
•
M
1. INTRODUCTION
• This Annual Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of the
California Health and Safety Code, Section 33080, as it pertains to the
activities of the Agency through the fiscal year 1981 -82. This report
recognizes the first complete year of the Agency's existence, which
reflects more on the early planning and implementation of key projects
which have been identified in the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
Plan adopted in December of 1981. This program will consider the
following items:
11
o Discussion of the Agency's activities to date.
o Outline the future Agency work program including specific
goals and tasks.
0 Agency activities relatad to housing.
o The Agency's financial audit of its previous year 1982 -83 in
accordance with California Health and Safety Code, Section
33080.1.
Il. ACTIVITIES OF PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83
During the 1982 -83 fiscal year, the Agency completed its first program
year. This past year, the Agency began work on several significant
projects, The following is a summary of the Redevelopment Agency's
accomplishments.
Flood Control Protection: Much of the redevelopment area is subject to
substantial flooding. Development within the project area is contingent
upon the construction of a regional flood control facility in the Day
and Etiwanda Creek areas. For some time the City has been involved with
other cities in the flood control area to develop a plan and
implementation program for completion of much needed flood control
facilities. Implementation of this plan is an Agency project and will
be funded with financial assistance by the Redevelopment Agency. During
the past year, the Agency has worked with other governmental agencies in
the study of financing a regional storm drain facility. This study was
completed by the engineering consultant firm of Willdan and
Associates, Their study investigated the possiblity of using a
Community Facilities District to fund the construction of a regional
storm drain facility. Should the district authorization be approved,
the district would be eligible to issue bonds for the construction of a
flood control facility. Assessments would be apportioned on property
within the district area. A portion of the redevelopment tax increment
would also be used to pay some portion of the district assessment.
1-
Vehicular Access and Circulation: The Redevelopment Plan identifies
potential constraints of eve opment due to inadequate vehicular access •
and circulation systems within the agency project area. The first phase
of circulation improvements include development of a freeway interchange
at Foothill Boulevard and I -15 and completion of future road
improvements at Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard. The freeway
interchange will provide for increased capacity in order to accommodate
projected traffic volumes along Foothill Boulevard. Private development
alone is unable to accomplish the significant task of completing
infrastructure design, right -of -way acquisition, and improvement
construction costs, in addition to obtaining necessary approvals from
CalTrans. During the past year, the Agency has funded the completion of
conceptual plans for both expansion of the Foothill Boulevard /I -15
freeway interchange and the intersection design at Day Creek Boulevard
and Foothill Boulevard. Both of these plans are the first stage in the
approval process necessary from CalTrans.
Housing Mortgage Bond Program (Costa Marks Act)
During the past year, the Agency acted as the issuing authority for
approximately $36.2 Million of housing mortgage bonds. A further
description of this program is contained in Section IV of this report
regarding activities of the Agency affecting housing.
III. GOALS AND WORK PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83
During this next year, the work program will consist of implementing the •
projects which have been prioritized in the Redevelopment Plan. Thus,
projects begun during th= past year will receive further implementation
and other projects will he considered as they relate to the overall
goals set forth in the Redevelopment Plan which include:
1. Protect and promote the sound development and redevelopment
of blight areas as defined in Section 33030 through 33032 of
the Health and Safety Code.
2. Assure that projects in the Agency areas provide assistance
in alleviating physical and economic barriers to development
in the redevelopment area.
3. Assure that projects within the Agency area are in
conformance with the City's Gn_neral Plan goals.
4. Assure that projects in the Agency area provide for balanced
and orderly development.
5. Provide for assurance of adequate tax increment to help
finance improvements in the project area.
The following is a summary of the projects and goals of their
implementation during the fiscal year 1983 -84.
•
-2-
• Flood Control Protection: During the next year, consideration will be
made for the approva of a Community Facility District to finance the
construction of a flood control facility in the Day Creek area. To he
approved, the district must receive a majority consent of land owners in
the district area. The Agency will also move forward with the
development of both conceptual plans and detailed drawings for future
facility construction. It is anticipated that work on the development
of these plans will last beyond the fiscal year 1983 -84.
Vehicular Access and Circulation: Upon the completion of the conceptual
plan for both the Foothi Bou evard /I -15 interchange and the Foothill
Boulevard /Day Creek intersection, the City forwarded these plans to
Cal Trans for preliminary approval, which should be made during the next
year. During this year the Agency will begin the process of
right -of -way acquisition for the future expansion of Foothill
Boulevard /I -15 freeway interchange. This activity will be necessary
prior to the actual expansion of the freeway interchange.
Other tlic Pro'ects in the Redevelo melt Pro 'ect Area: There exists
of er imp e invents towar uture eve opment w is t e Redevelopment
Agency will consider in discussions of an owner participation agreement
for a major shopping center. The purpose will be to access what role is
appropriate for the Agency in order to help implement goals of the
Redevelopment Agency toward the alleviation of barriers to future
development.
® A reems with Service Districts: The Agency has agreements with
Foothi en i fire Protection District, Chino Basin Municipal Mater S Sewer
District, and Cucamonga County Water District to provide financial
support to alleviate any financial burden caused by the project. The
Agency will collect funds and will consider requests made by the
respective service districts for support of activities from those fund
accounts for implementation of Redevelopment Agency Plan program goals
and projects.
IV. AGENCY'S ACTIVITIES AFFECTING HOUSING
The Redevelopment Agency, in conformance with California Redevelopment
Law, sets aside 20% of its tax increment to assist in affordable housing
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This fund is targeted to specifically
assist projects which assure the provision for a range of housing
opportunites to meet the needs of Rancho Cucamonga.
The Agency has pursued two projects during the past year in order to
further its goals in providing for housing opportunities. The following
is a summary of those activities:
Housing Mortgage Bond Program: During the past year, the Agency acted
as the issuing authority for a 536.2 Million housing mortgage bond issue
under the California Costa Marls Act. The program provides low interest
mortgages for the purchase of approximat ley 500 newly constructed homes
during the next three years. Eligibile applicants must be first -time
-3-
home buyers and must purchase homes within defined project areas.
Approximately $14 Million of the mortgage bond program is targeted to •
low and moderate income households with incomes less than 120% of area
household income. During the next year, which will include the first
full year of the mortgage bond program, it is anticipated that
approximately $11.1 Million of mortgage money will be issued to cover
approximately 115 new housing units.
Senior Citizen Housing
During the past year, the Agency has pursued the establishment of the
City's first senior citizen housing facility. The Agency, acting in
concert with the City, completed the legal mechanisms for approval of a
overlay zoning district which provides for senior citizen housing and
completed a development agreement with the development firm of Calmark
Corporation of Santa Monica to construct 233 apartment units on
approximately 6.25 acres located northwest of Base Line Road and
Archibald Avenue. Of the total number of units available for senior
citizens, 70% will be targeted to households of low and moderate
income. In addition to providing certain development incentives, the
development agreement with the City provides assistance of the
Redevelopment Agency on reimbursement to the developer for cost of
certain off -site improvements associated with this project. These
improvements include the project's storm drain facility and off -site
street improvements.
V. FISCAL AUDIT FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83 •
In accordance with California Health and Safety Code, Section 33010.8
(a), the Redevelopment Agency commissioned the firm of Lance, Soll, and
Lun ghard, certified public accountants, to complete an examination of
financial statements of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency for
the year ending June 30, 1983. This financial audit, as submitted to
the Redevelopment Agency, is attached as part of this report.
•
-4-
I
•
I
LANCE. SOLL B LJNGHARD
co•..�.m •ue, c �<covwv rs
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPME %T AGENCY
AUDIT REPORT
JUNE 30, 1983
,j
LANCE. SOLL 8 LUNCHARD
cx c•,r o e „e.c .cco�n vn•s
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGLNCY •
ESTABLISHED MAY 20. 1981
GOVERNING BOARD
Jon D. Mikels
Charles J. Buduet II
Jam-s C. Frost
Phillip D. Schlosser
Richard M. Dahl
OTHER OFFICIALS
Lauren M. Wasserman
Harry Empey
Chairman
Executive Director/
Secretary
Treasurer
John Brom Legal Counsel •
LANCE. SOLL 8 LUNCHARD
CERTIFIED .uatlC . CCCUbI.p•s
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT ,.' -,:CY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Number
AUDITOR'S OPINION - Financial Audit 1
- Compliance Audit 2
EXHIBIT A - Combined Fund Balance Sheet, June 30, 1983 4
EXHIBIT B - Combined Statement of Revenues, F."Eviditures
and Changes in Fund Balance - Governmental
Fund Type, for the Fiscal Year Ended June
30, 1983 5
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
8
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION
•
Schedule 1
- Debt Service Funds - Combining Fund Balance
Sheet, June 30, 1983
10
Schedule 2
- Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes In Fund Balance - Debt Service
Funds, for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
11
1983
Schedule 3
- Capital Projects Funds - Combining Fund
Balance Sheet, June 30, 1983
12
Schedule 4
- Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balance - Capital Projects
Funds, for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1983
13
Schedule 5
- Debt Service Funds - Cash Held by Trustee,
Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1983
Series A, for the Fiscal Year Ended June
30, 1983
14
1
LANCE. SOLL B LUNGHARD
w0�[ +T c (•vcC CtaTlllm nUILIC ACCOUNTANTS
+.c vA +o a xo.L xono ao an(m wr sown( -e ,e •.c.(
r +m wvo.+•no. .,a z J ease +z
•w.v oov w wwnawe Soo so. v owe[vLUr •.[vv(
DOR•l0 L a•an[a WHtTTI[R, CAOfOanIA 90602
Governing Board
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Financial Audit Report
We have examined the combined financial statements of the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency for the year ended June 30, 1983 listed in the
foregoing table of contents. Our examination was made in accordance with gen-
erally accepted auditing standards and included such tests of the accounting
records and s_ch cthnr auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.
In our opinion, the aicrementioned financial statements present •
fairly the financial position of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
at June 30, 1983 and the results of its operations for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles as well as accounting
systems prescribed by the State Controller's office and state regulations gov-
ering special districts applied on a basis consistent with that of the preced-
ing year.
Our examination was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the
combined financial statements taken as a whole. The information contained in
Schedules 1 through 5 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is
not a required part of the combined financial statements; however, it has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the examination of the combined
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material res-
pects in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole.
July 18, 1983 `
c..�ro +v.• aoci[.. or cu nnm . .�c AcccvvuNa
AM( +iCAM iM[Tl.�t( 01 C[I, tII �[D •tea LiC AcG O'J M.. NLS
woeuT c .,rvcc
• n¢ «•wo c wcu
rwco� a «c «•+o, u+
a +, «co« w +owa
LANCE, SOLL 8 LUNGHAKD
CCw TIrgC nuauC .eccouN +.w +a
woe zeo Boaz «�z•r sou uz
Tzon socT. r..ce «�ur.re«uc
W.ITT10,, uurtI ooe oz
Governing Board
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Compliance Audit Report
izu �e ae mn
We have examined the financial statements of the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency for the year ended June 30, 1983 and have issued our
report thereon dated July 18, 1983. Our examination was made in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards and included such tests of the ac-
counting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances.
As part of our review we have completed a compliance examination as
required under Section 33080.1 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of
California. Our compliance examination was made in accordance with the State
of California, State Controller Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs
"Guidelines for Compliance Audits of California Redevelopment Agencies" and
included such other tests and procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.
In our opinion, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has com-
piled with laws, regulations and administrative requirements, as contained in
the "Guidelines for Compliance Audits of California Redevelopment Agencies ",
of the State of California, governing its activities for the fiscal year end-
ing June 30, 1983.
Under section 33080.1, the Agency must prepare a report to Its
Legislative body and the Department of Housing and Community Development of
the State within six months of the end of the fiscal year. Because the re-
port is not due until December 31, 1983, the Agency has not yet prepared:
wv.acn
c•uronn�, so��Tr or czmnm eu u�c .cco u«r. «a
• +v¢,w np n+o rr a' cc-' - .- wuu c .cco u «+ua
LANCE, SOLL 8 LUNCH.IRD
ccw+•ro wv ��.c .ccoonunn
Governing Board
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment •
Agency
Compliance Report
Page 2
(1) a work program for fiscal year 1983 -84, (2) an examination of fiscal year
1982 -83 achievements and comparison with goLls; and (3) recommendations for
needed legislation as required by Section 33080.1 of the Health and Safety
Code as of the date of our audit. However, the Agency has informed us that
the required fiscal year 1982 -83 information will be prepared and filed in
time to comply with the Health and Safety Code. We also reviewed the report
required for fiscal year 1981 -82 and noted that, while it was filed by the
Agency, it was submitted on January 7, 1983 after the December 31, 1982 filin;
date.
July 18, 1983
0
E
LANCE, SOLL B LUNCHARD Exhibit A
• RANCHO CUCAMONTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COMBINED FUND BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 1983
See Notes to Financia: Statements
4
Governmental
Account
Fund Types
Group
_
General
Total
Debt
Capital
Long -Term
(Memorandum
A S S E T S
_ Service
Projects
Debt
•
Only)
Cash in hank
$ 530,062
$ 242,302
$ 772,364
Cash with trustee
36,240,372
36,240,372
Taxes receivable
50,834
12,708
63,542
7Drerest receivable
426,001
768
426,769
Amount available in debt
service funds
$ 36,437,500
36,437,500
Total
$ 37.247.269
$ 255,778
$ 36.437.500
$ 7'�.94y0�47
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
f
Liabilities
•
Accounts payable
Due to City of Rancho
$ 2,122
$ 2,122
Cucamonga
S 10,000
10,000
Luaub payable to City
of Rancho Cucamonga
(Note 4)
$ 237,500
237,500
Bonds payable (Notes 3
and 0
36.200,000
36,200,000
Total Liabilities
$ 10,000
1 2,122
$ 36,437,500
$ 36,449,622
Fund Equity
Fund Balance
Reserves
Encumbrances
$ 50,242
$ 50,242
Pass Through Agree-
ments (Note 5)
32,555
32,555
Unreserved
D :-ignated for debt
service
S 36,437,500
36,43',500
L'ndesignated (Exhibit B)
799,769
170,859
970,628
Total Fund Equity
$ 37,237,269
$ 253,656
$ 37,40925
Total
$ 31.247.269
$ 255.778
$
$ 73.940.541
1b
See Notes to Financia: Statements
4
SA NC.t SOLI N IIINGH IKD
nrYAWN(:U(IHINI.A Mf 111 Vl l.r rl :YI YI AI:F IIr
CIIHIO vl U S In rlrl-0T Ui NI V I to I IxPr W.l 11 Ni IN.
EHANb LS IN 11IND 3AIANl1 - C1 IV N.4Hl NIA1 MN I \rl
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENOF'N IONS 0. 1'1X1
IaLlblt x
DIRT •.i KV-H I HIND•.
CAPIIAI.
1'PUliii
F11x01
'PIrAI. Mi]fUHANUIIg
ONLT
rlem r
Vw rlan�e
.
Rrvn r.rhlr
i'a vuraLle
..... ble
iavoraLle
_ PrAYrt__
_ A<..,1 ___
(CAW avuraM1le)
Xud[
Ar[ueI
111n1avuraLlrl
gadget
_ r[val _
lllnlav_L1�
Revenues
i
La nc regent (Nair 5)
5 191,001)
> 6!15,911(1
11.,991
5 12 1,000
5 Is., 49 7
$ 28,497
$ 614,0(10
$ )5),4(11
5 141,481
Sn [e rest edebt ir
491,11311
491,901
211
4,520
4,520
496,421
496,421
�- Long-teo der[ proceeds
11,-
118,10(1
848,500
111,500
Developer par[Irlya[L.,n
_ _ _
N48�lUI!
_ PL yUllfl
__
-
848.000
--848 W0
Total Revenue
5 491_00
5 1_4 iI 18'11
5 11454891
5 12 _)NO
5 21 3_511
5 1501517
5 61410
$ - 21219(2408
> _ L.605,409
Expenditures
Adminlai u[lon
5 1XI,('()o
5 41,751
5 118,249
5 I81,Ur10
5 42,751
$ 138,249
Legal ae -L'e.
12,000
11,111
20,629
32,000
11,311
20,629
Plannlog, ...—, and design
II,S00
(1 /,500)
11,500
(17.5110)
Project teprov ---t
5 III, OOD
$ (10,000)
280,0011
28(),000
280,000
10,D()0
270,OOO
s
Lam I...a -e co 11
263.318
(261,318)
241.338
:26),318)
_ Ilebt re[t tern[
5 sn `DU
__s01W0
_ _ -_-
_
_.__ —
_ 5(__000
—__
5 310 OW
1
_-
" Total Expenditures
$ _SO 900
5 27 1,3 ifl
5 (221118)
5 491 000
5 _ 71 22
$ 42I18
$ 543,000
$ 1441.60
$ - 1918 040
Lic of Rev Uver
(Under) Bapend[[urea
5 441yDD0
5 lhR`55%
51131 551
5f 3)y0D0)
$ 2011895
5 57�k fl95
5 11100
$ - 1_14_48
$ -1_190 448
Other Financing Snur (Uses)
Proceeds t,. ..le of bonds
Par value
5 In.200, NO
5 16, 2W. W[
5 36, 200. W(1
5 '6.200, NO
Unde renters discount
(1,049,800)
(1, 049, HOO)
(1,049, gulp
(1,049, BOO)
Accrued tote rest
454,621
414,621
454,621
454.621
Tpm(e ra of [u lnt[eaent to
a cc ardance 118th pac. [rraugh
agreements (Sntr 5)
_ p•0 1051
___ 140 1305)
(40 105)
_0 115)
Total Other Financing
Soo ¢ee (Uses)
_0-
5 1_556 4 j16
5 151641)16
0-
$ 355556.44)16
5 15,564,716
E..... of lterenue and utter
Sources O,o -, (ender Lxpen
dtta[es and rl[Ner uses
5 k9S,J2VD
; ,,,:3,,269
S ]Le19Sejy_j
sl } :utLL4V1
5 201.x91
s 511.995
5 -llA U{LU
5 1),4)9,164
5 U_j((g_,04
Fond balance
geglnntng at Year - 1.1, 1, 19X2
_ -0-
_ 51116)
End of Yee, - lane 30, 1981
(Bihiblt M
S 1l,:J /.;4Y
5 ;11.bih
5 71.4'JOeY u'
• See Not .... I. ilne n. L.11
5-
>varer-11,
•
LANCE, SOLL 8 LUNCHARD
CfR TI�I[C RV•lIC hCCO VNT/.NTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
• NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 1983
Note 1: The Agency was established May 20, 1981. As of June 30, 1983, the
Rancho Redevelopment Project Area was the only project area formed
by the Aa_nncy. A description of the funds maintained and the basis
of accounting is as follows:
Description of Fund Accounting Systems
Governmental accounting systems are organized and operated
on a fund basis. A fund is defined as an independent fiscal
and accounting entity with a self - balancing set of accounts
recording cash and other financial resources, together with
all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and
changes therein, which are segregated for the purpoee of carry-
ing on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in
accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limita-
tions.
Types of Funds
The following type of fund is utilized by the Agency.
Governmental Funds
Debt Service Funds - to account for the accumulation of
resources for, and the payment of, general long -term debt
principal and interest.
Capital Project Funds - to account for financial resources
to be used for the acquisition or construction of major
capital facilities.
Account Groups
a�The Agency utilizes the following account group:
6 -
LANCE. SOLL 0 LUNGHAR.D
cze. nm 1u..¢ •ccous•� "a
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: (Continued)
General Leng -Term Debt Group of Accounts - All long -ter-
indebtei.,ess of the Agencv (loans, bonds, etc., due more
than one year after the end of the current year) is re-
corded in this group of accounts. Available proceeds of
this indebtedness are recorded in the Capital Project
Fund and serves as operating revenue for redevelopment
expenses.
Basis of Accounting
0
Cove mmental fund revenues and expenditures are recognized on
the modified accrual basis. Revenues are recognized in the
accounting period in which they become available and object- •
ively measurable. Expenditures are recognized in the account-
ing period in which they are incurreu, if objectively measur-
able, except for unmatured interest or. general long -term debt,
which is recognized when due.
Note 2: Other Accounting Policies
"Memorandum Only" caption on combined statements means that
totals are presented for overview information purposes only
and that they do not fairly present financial position or re-
sults of operations for the Agency as a whole in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
Note 3: During fiscal year 1982 -83, the Agency issued $36,200,000 of
Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1983 Series A. The bonds
are dated March 1, 1983 and will mature on the dates and in
principal amounts, and bear interest at the rates indicated below:
E
7 _
LANCE, SOIL 8 LUNGHARD
CtN71F iCO WU.0C ACCOUNTANTS
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
• Agency
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 3: (Continued)
Maturity
Cate
Interest
March 1
Amount
Rate
1998 $
3,915,000
9,250 T
2008 $
15,645,000
9.375 S
2014 $
16,640,000
9.500
The bonds are Term Bonds.
The bonds are subject to special mandatory redemption in whole or in
part commencing September 1, 1983, as specified in the Trust Indenture
and Official Statement for the issue on file with the Agency.
The proceeds of the bond issue will be used to acquire mortgage loans
(secured by newly constructed single family dwellings in the Rancho
Redevelopment Project Area) and to establish certain debt reserves.
As of June 3^, 1983 no mortgages had been acquired by the Agency.
The binds are a limited obligation of the Agency and are payable solely
from payments made on, and secured by, a pledge on acquired mortgage
loans and certain reserve funds, other monies in connection with the
Bond Resolution and certain money pledged by the Agency as described
in the Trust Indenture and Official Statement. The bonds will not be
payable from any of the Agency's other revenues, monies or assets.
Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State or anv
other political subdivision thereof has been pledged to the payment of
the bonds.
Note 4: During fiscal year 1982 -83, the following changes occurred in the
Agency's general long -term debt group of accounts:
Balance Repay- Balance
12 7/1/82 Additions ments 6 /301A1
Loans from City of
Rancho Cucamonga $ 120,000 $ 117,500 -0- $ 237,500
- 8 -
17
LANCE. 5OLL 8 LUNCH.ARD
CE R, ,'.[. oV1.iC AC COVN•�H�S
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment •
Agency
Notes to Financial State.eents (Continued)
Note 4: (Continued)
Balance Repa7- Balance
7/1/82 Additions went= 6/30183
Residential Mortgage
Revenue Bonds, 1983
Series A (See Note 3) -0- $ 36,200,000 -0- $ 36,200,000
Totals S 120.00D $ 36.117.500 S. $ 36.,917"SD�
Note 5: The Agency has entered into various pass through agreements for the
allocation of tax increments due the Agency to other taxing entities.
During fiscal year 1982 -83, the following transactions occurred with
respect to these agreements:
ENTITIES INVOLVED
Chino Basin Municipal Cucamonga
Foothill Water District Countv
Fire General Debt Service Water
District Lev, Lev, District Total
Debt Service Fund Revenues
Tax Increment attributable
to entity $ 80,310 S 42,197
Less 202 allocation to
Affordable Housing Fund
required by Health and
Safety Code (1048) (8,432)
Revenue recognized
in respective debt
service funds $ 64.2¢1 $ 13.,765.
Debt Service Funds Expenditures
Payments made to entity Q=
Affordable Housing Fund Reserve
for Pass Through Agreements
202 allocation as required
by Health and Safety Code $ 16.046 $ 8.432
$ 7,208 $ 33,170 $ 162,885
(16442) (6633) (32,555)
$ 5.766 $ 26.537 $ 110.31:
$(7.159) $(31�2Y6) S (40"105)
$ 44 $ 6.633 $ _31.551
Note: Transactions involving the Chino Basin Municipal Water District - General
levy and the Cucamonga County Water District are combined in the Sewer and •
water Facilities Funds as required by the pass through agreements.
- 9 -
- 10 -
•
•..ivdul.-
LANCE. SOLL B� GHARD
1
NAN(No CUl M(]Nt.A REUIVFIoPNt Nf
ALFNtt
UEhr SERVICE FIINUS
C,yNhl.lM FUND bal,Nf -E SIIEEI
JUNE 30, 1981
Flr .. .tlu
Sever and
Tna
Mort W.N•'
Fite
Nu. 4vO1`e ration
Vrtrr
Non [ec lata�b le
Im to rn[
Rem nnr Ym[vrt
ion
nA
Facllllleu
Vaetr 6v neaa
A S 5 E T 5
Fund
land
Fund
Malntvn.un a Fund
Fond
Fund
Total
Cull In bank
5 419,811
5
64,262
$ 21,356
5(1,393)
5 ]30,062
Cash utth t e (SCM1edule h)
$ 36.240,312
36,140.312
Taaea r eelvable
5D,814
50,814
In[e rent rrcelva6le
_lyltl
422,910
__
-___
__
426.001
Total
5 441.14:
5 lhsh41e1171 5
(42
=L-
S 21 lib
S( A])
5 ]1.24].269
LIABILITIES A.9D FUND EiiU1TT
_ Liabilities
Oun m CL[y of Rancho CueawnRa
$ -IUy00
$ 10100
Fund Equity
Fund balance
Un re ee rued
Ile alyna ted Eor UeE[ Se rvtoe
5 :SI, SIIII
5 15,1W ,n:10
$ 36,43I,500
Undol6nated (Schedule 23
246,242
Lh yln2 S
64 -o
-0-
S 21_3Sh
S(1_3911
199_M9
Total Fund Equity
5 48 al 142
$ 36.661.102 $
64:262
_U-
$ 27,_J56
$I1y193)
5 111 13269
Total
$ 491_142
S 1d.441.]92 5
ui2 ,
a
5 V-1itt
5(1 ]4])
5 11-CkLkw
- 10 -
NCE. SOLL A LUNGfHARU
tnbedull 2
e. Fr Jell llIlM1NLA MFl*lILIA MF.l
AI.IM:Y
GMIDININL STATEMENT OF REVENUES, UPLNDITURF.S
ANU IRANI.1',
IN FUND BALANCE - DEBT SERVICE
FUND'.
FOR THE FMAL YE1R ENDED JUNE
10, 1981
Fl— tihrtlnn
Sr-er and
Tax
Nn r
Flre
No. 4 Upe [orlon
Water
Nonrrclel..ble
Increment
Ne Venrre
Prurr'ct I..
oe.
F. —II eu
Vnete 5vetea�
Find
___ F'nnd __
Fund
Na1 :i4enan.e Fond
land
fund
Revenue
_Total__
T.. [,cream,[
5 415,660
5 64.2,2
$ 60,102
5 5.766
5 605,990
In[eree[
I8,IIH2
5 411,81'1
491,901
Yeveloper participation
__-
Mt By)OU
_
_ -_
__
_ _84B DOW
Total R—n—
5 49_:42
5 — [21,814
5 6462
-O-
5 60,102
5 55.166
$ 1,945 ,891
Expenditures
Project lyrovemanl.
5 10,000
5 10,000
r band i ... lot. coats
5 26 illy
_ _263_1]8
Total E.pendlturee
5 10_ 000
5 - -_ 26 1111'
S _ 211,118
Rare.. of Revenues over
(Under) I .... dl[ure.
5 4B ,242
$ I_i58i8:
5 64,2,2
-Y_
$ 6 IO2
$ Sy166
$ 1ihn,551
OrFee Flroncing Sauce. (Uaea)
Proceed. from ale of bonds
Par value
5 le,200,Ipn
5 16,200,000
Undetvrlteu el.r..er
(1,U4Y, WI!.1
(11049,800)
Accrued In[art .t
454,621
454,621
Tr ... far of [... men[ In
ordmnca With pa.. [hough
.beer,[.
_
5(4_i46)
SUit9)
(40105)
Total a[hrr Pl nand ng
Sourco :U See)
-
5 15y6642.
_-
V12,946)
$0,1591
$ l5 514 Jl6
Seem.. of fl v—oe and nrnet
5ourru •We[ (Under) F..yen-
dit.ra..:nd Other U.e.
5 481,142
5 16,661,102
$ 64,262
-D-
5 27,156
5(1,391)
5 11,217,269
Fund Balance
Beginning of Year - July 1. 1982
_0_
--
_0_
- - --
_U_
_ —
_0-
- -
_0_
- --
_0-
_-
_O_
End of Year _ June W. 1981
(Srhadute 1)
S 49LL42
5 Sb— tueJll2
5 0.282
-Q-
5 Z/J14
sq,191)
269
• - II - • 0
LANCE. SOLL 8 LUNGHARD
c[ern ... e.c .cco on.xna
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
COMBINING FUND BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 1983
Schedule 3
11
�I
Affordable
Redevelopment
Housing
A S S E T S
Fund
Fund
Total
Cash in bank
$ 100,051
$ 142,251
$ 242,302
Taxes receivable
12,708
12,708
interest receivable
768
768
Total
$ 194..451
S 155.727
$ 5".778
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Liabilities
Accounts payable
$ 2,122
$ 2,122
• Fund Equity
Fund Balance
Reserve for encumbrances
$ 50,242
S 50,242
Rcserve for pass through
agreements
$ 32,555
32,55`
Unreserved
Undesignated
47,687
123,172
170,899
Total Fund Equity
(Schedule 4)
$1 97,929
$ 155,727
$ 253,656
Total
$ ag zu
$ 155_,722
$ 255.77P
11
�I
LANCE, SOLL 8 LUNGHARD
cc•nrm •��.c •cco��uH•s
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVEIOPMENT AGENCY
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - CAPIIAL PROJECTS FUNDS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1983
Revenue
Tax increment
Long -term debt proceeds
Interest
Total Revenue
Expenditures
Administration
Legal services
Planning, survey and design
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance
Beginning of Year - July
1, 1982
End of Year - June 30, 1983
(Schedule 3)
r 13 -
Affordable
Redevelopment Housing
Fund Fund
S 151,497
$ 117,500
4,520
$ 117,500 S 156,017
$ 42,461
11,371
17,500
$ 71,332
S 290
$ 290
Schedule 4
ri
LJ
Total
S 151,497
117,500
4,52
$ 273,517
$ 42,751
11,371
17,500
$ 71,622
$ 46,168 S 155,727 S 20'_,89:0
51,761 -0- 51,761
$ 97,929 $ 155 727 S 253.656
L
LANCE, SOLL ® LUNCHARD
CLPiI.ILJ IV ILIC ICCOVNi1NT!
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS - CASH HELD BY TRUSTEE
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, 1983 SERIES A
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1983
Schedule 5
_ H 0 R T G A G E R E V E N U E F U N D
Deb[ Mortgage
Bond Sv..ice loan Issuance
Interest Reserve Purchase Expense
Fund Fund Account Account Total
Cash Balance
Beginning of Year
July 1, 1983 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
Receipts
Proceeds from sale
of bonds $ 454,621 $ 2,656,200 $ 32,224,000 $ 270,000 $ 35,604,821
Interest 7,263 42,820 806 50,889
Developer partici-
pation 848,000 848,000
• Disbursements
Bond issuance
costs (263.338) (263,338)
Cash Balance
End of Year -
June 30, 1983
Held by trustee
(Schedule 1) $ 461,884 $ 2.699.020 $ 33.072.000 S 7,468 S U_24j_r2
I
- 14 -
AnTICLIK d. IfFI'OttTINO ItYOTIMMIRN'T
first Teed., of the h•.hmnrC body denr'rog Lot' ual+, st dlpv fr„or the <ocelrt
ftfl i
of the report.
BK
(Addrl'by Stnts.IM. C. 797, 1. 244:1, 13.)
3:gk50. Flung Copy of mlro6
4. .... blllty of piorl.leN eel Alat•.Ie)r, e
)p7. me. nnt<uncle. 113080.
bed,
to leabin[Ib Iva :' INro 1.
3iplh)2
le,loo
:UU90.2 IlerleW Of mp0r[ INrw 1.
1 33060.3 Opinlen of s0enpyl Compliance wlih brs and repulalens; •drbary cam•
:L1 t 0111hlon of Ilk'enCYN Cnmyllnnee with law, and nwhiot o.: ntivlvnry cool
Titter: time of Certain reporting requirements
mitre: time of rerUdm mportinc regndrrmeute i ?:elvl.
I
Notwithstanding the prorlaimu of Sectie:' ii060 or 39080.], • an oplm
ALIMJ Agem;r nett Yltin: dercriytina: Totem. ISrev
ton of the agency's compliance with Iowa, ariolallona and administrative req�lre-
A,tb-1, 9 1 hdl,d by Sf.b.1975. a If3r, P. f81.1. 1 a.
>nte Ito lmin, netirltiry of the I...... Lot n•Vldred by sulrdlrl -lOn 0q fit B110m1
:431 &).1, • • • shall be Included for the first time in the first nlrort filed
33080. Filing copy of report
with the department find Vrenen[ed to the .,they + Ieglit ative belly for the aFnq i
Seep agency shall file with the depnrment. • • • within ale month. of the
last fiscal year ended prior to March 1, 10110, The Slate Controller .hall develop
end of the agm¢T i brunt year, a roll' of the relrOrt rCgnl n•d Ir; SCetlnrl :4vPU.l,
gOldCllnea for tilt tmrtnd Of such portion of [he report not later Into July ), ]OTD.
Added by Stab.1975, e. 1117. P. 251:3. 1 R. Amended by Bantv.I977, r. 7117, p. ll 4i,
Tom State C.Ifealor *hai .,,.lot an red Yll committee to advise the State Cam
1; etata1978, 1. M p. Wt. It 1. Orgemv, rr. Sept. 21, tP7n.)
i
troller I. the derelopineut of Ile, guidelines. Consisting of One member of a Clly
Battles 17 Of 9tab.11r), e. 137. p� '11), Ion Ameedhoyt SublrtltntM "e
readad• opyro:
Iauncll which setvea as the governing body o[ Its Kdevelopmeht agency, wed shall
m .fir or-IsIom rr rnl..<v Or u,n reDO.e r eul.rn o. «non 1.ne�-
• applkY Own nrrcrt any pe nn r n tom ilbrrea.r ..f It. e<nvNra tlannp
• I heel Imruld.
be nominated by the LceguC Of California Cltin, one member of n manly bonnl of
ah.nsto ell lw+lld. tn[;revlom Ibol Y r with veers ends -
not If!<t other provlrlun! or app flan (ur needed IvL'Ial.tlun 1° c mrY n
+ruper,imer whirl, tlCmre ns flit, ......I., body of Its ntle w'.enl Agency a0
mlom of IFe let wnwh can be riven - r..p sir rae..m • f nouanr Con r fir mu-
t Without the Invllld provif ton, +Noll- nlfY deY[. 11.1l In +'111
shall her n minn[ed D y the County SllperYl!°n AteMla[IOn of California, and two
carols"
11 hurt. ant, to this ens :be pr-oloom of Library Referin<!•
la ac Is It llva re ill!"
representatives each from (1) the department, (2) the California Society Of fiertlted
X11.
State! 160 et ahg.
Public Anemmtlnte, (3) mn11tL'Ipal finance Officer., (4) redo,,hpment agencies..red
33060.1 Report to Iegl,a ls. Body
151 Independent aetivritlee In the field.
rOU we
F.mry rtderelopmen[ nlmney ehnll present n
sent report to Its leglaAtive
That portion of -he report renulred by .ubdivblong (b), (e), and (III of Section
body within
e of the and fir the nm•nc ,;t,
y a y The rcfroa nhnll mnnlln fill of
33050.1 for the flusl Year I077 -78, shall Ix filed with the department and presented
It following:
to the agenCY•e legl.lotird fund nor before 31vcn 1. Ind.
Y °
(al A. Ind [pendent fl n. rcirort for the +I...... l "Audit
Added by S. 1975, 1159, p. 1DCt 1 1s7, oNoInch elf. Sept. 21, Amended by
Sla1..1979,
>rnr. re.
vet" nwnn. an e. tiro r.
Or. end on, he ft .In[emtjo, Of tbC
I
..I
c 8, p. ]0, { 1.5, urgers CY. efts 31arch 1, 197.); SInu.19TD, <. 1070. p.
6. .
3837.11.1
t, the ru
t...OU
Lately wl pecans the eat . ..I rinbd
r of ll+In aye lnl nori[Itr of tilt,
+gene). Sueb audit shall
such rob
r �ndnN "InhoI with k"o-
nu<e wl[, {T+ valor grtcd a
(
'
1 I , Lodit
r s<nndn N. end the ruler go•erulug :uull[ mph <G Pnnnldnntrd by the State
l Late
1
! 330110.4 Alertly .etlritln; d.wrlpllen; ee ntenl.
Itoard of Aernoutaney. Tbl .. alit report -boll Ilan bad fide no o Ilion of the l+gro.
For file pagroal Of compilnnm with pnrngraph (C) of Section tIVIII 1, the deser'p'
Y mmpilaace with II I r,oftflnnr :uul ndndnlelrrtivc redlirnnvnts governing
tion of file eaerU'. aetiAtlem *hall mnt+le the following Information Irrespeetlr-
orifice of the darn,-
'
of whether or not each aMlrlly la forded etch,I,ly by the elate or fCdernl govern
llowc¢-q the h4lrinthr Ivnly I'LL, rI... fa niolt rnmr Loin If In the undlt rt
loCn[:
r[. nuT dla[Inat nc[Flt]' of the ngcmy alit", le fondeJ ee+luv Halt by for frdenni
(a) The total number fit hots ldn [lint s CrC dbplmmd O not fro 1 t10 l
ternment nmd W11eh b anhlrct M 0mllt by all ngenrY or lolrumentolity of the
dwelling units as part of a nd»velnmiient:reject or the agencyrdering the peeriou .
ederal government.
fl.cal year.
90 A work program for the mmh+g year, h¢hrding goals.
(b) The total number of households that the agency estimate. will be, dl.plo<Cd o
(t) An eeebdnntbn of the p erlou. >ri neblen•hoab ord it tomPnriwn of the
will more tram their dwellings its port of n redevelnrmrnt
I Vndevt of tilt eFCnq
mr ievementa with the gOels Of [Ile previous year's work prugrom
du(a) the present year.
(d) It"Ontmendatlun. for needed legblnten to entry m+ yr•,perly a program of
1
basin, and C °mmnnit. @celopmnrt III California.
mien
(c) The total number of dwel!Ina unl[a how10R venoms and Lmllln of low end
W A Oeycrly[lon of the 111,11'i 11111111,, nfr,elin, homing end dieplexemrnt.
moderate income which have been destroyed or removed from the PiwOr malrrnte-
Added by S[acv]S7. e. TOT, 144:1,
Ir_ 1 "t. Amnnle.l ! a p. 1 11.6,
1,
Income housing market during the Vrevinun fbenl Ten, n. part of • redOstlopmint
nt-t off. Sept. 21, 1 urgl9TF,
Stn[n.1PTP, e. (i, p. ID, / 1, uryenry, elf. >Inn-0 1, 1UT11;
1 r, Nj 1.
project of the agurdy.
-A
5[rt ».1!Wi. a 2W, R -.11.)
I I,
(d) The total number of dwelling units which the nacnq taco nosed to BC rnm.
•:nBlir or priori lane °r Statsl,n. I. Llp,a amrmmncrm
.truemd, rehabliltnted. or developed during the presto is fiscal year for Occupancy
..< note -der 113060. ,Oz pal Car .... u>n. false.
at an affordable hmmlllg mBt by prisons find families or low and moderate Income.
v..3 vI u°m<ipal Crfppmuan. I lees.
1
(Added by 9[nts.11011. , 206, p. -, 1 2J
3060.1 1111Mw •1 report
The 1rKIMut He boor stall reel" the rC Wr[ find take tiny uctlun whlo3 IL deem.
1 33000.3
The Title or Slahstyp. a 1. referred to Health am Safes Code. No much section.
roprin[n Con Ise
IVp r.•pn v v;Iblotea p'r r.nnnf [O 4eet"n :1:111„i.i Fops Ili
tho addition of a "Section 13030.5" In the home. < ! In<b d<d m In. prov.i.- ^I
na °n LAC
sut..vi1.
•r Vederllne Indicates changes or additions by amendment
•
A tarlta! • • • Indicate dtieten. by imandoonl •
26
27
A867 CITYWRANCNO CUCAMONGA
WARA A YEN 6 Y F N O L R N A M F
WARRANT RI � IIATICM
OGiE RFfFRF,0F
11!81
``TICK [C
7127103
EMi " U
11!30 /U
IREMEN -' SYS
11123183
OOU CI3Y
11/23183
MST
11/23181
LAN eM SERV
11/23/9,
SON Cc
11/23/93
sun CO
11/23/8)
1t /29/x1
AURIN M
11/26/83
L AGENCY
11 /28 /81
L AGENCY
11129183
T
11/29/83
LIE CITIES
11/29/63
ATION MEAL?
11/30/83
15194TONS
11/30/83
ICA
11/30183
EMAL SAYING
13/30/63
RT ASSOC
11 /30/83
NU CUCAMONG
11/30/83
ONGA EMPLOY
11/30/83
PROBATION
11/30/83
FED NAY
11/)0 /8)
V
11/30/83
OY
12201183
12 /01 /Bi
2/01/83
17ASETN
32!01/,3
12/01/03
2!01/83
IOLABETM
12/05/63
L AGENCY
12/05/83
ILE
12/01/83
AR7ER LIMES
12101163
,F IFLO
j2/01163
2/07/63
:IO
12/07/03
UCL
12/07/61
2/07/93
VGE
12%0)%83
12/07/83
FE
12/07/83
RA
12/07/,3
FB61F
12/01/83
2/C 1/83
Y,ARA
12/07/93
12/07/83
2/01/83
1ANNA
12/01/93
12/01/83
2/01/83
1
'/07/93
12/07/81
1A
12107/83
12/07/83
. AGENCY
12/01/,3
0
1NC
12/08/83
12/0e/93
LM IFS
12 108 18l
WRLY
(C /OS 193
1/02/83
LRIS
II /l6 /8'3
SON CO
ilJlt /63
IRUCIION
12107193
12/07/683
LENT
12/21/83
IENI
12121/83
IFNT
12/21/83
11/11!83
VISCOUNT NET
111.74 -
1 9.1G-
4,9,I.00
11,183.36
15.00
30.00
19.44
21,696.96
68,060.99
139.57
25.00
6
1
0
316.00
I
l
t
I.5
3.4
10.7
3.4
• PAGE
R867 CITIY RANCHO CUCAMONGA WARRANT REC po JJ111CN 12/11/63 • PAGE 2
WMR • V£ R V E N 0 0 R N A A F DATE RFfFPFMCE UISCEUNT NET
S
L
TCH
NQ
R INFC CFF
RECNEAIIU
C
S SIGN SEA
A CO WATER GIST
PURL
TIRE SERVICE
GUERRA L ASSOC
A S
LNG MARC
AART
E WOKEN ENEL
TE``EPHUNE CC
TALE FA 511 NERS
ICR
ERRT R
ALS NORM TOGS
g�/1AN L
915
04
luxE EO Fp C
LUIHIFR CO
APER
UNS PRESS
T MGRI ASSOC
INFERS L U
CIUs 0i RANCHO
AT
NSIRUCTION CU
R
ROOUCTS INC
F CII11LlF CITIES
- SANOERSON -HORN
OIAI
AN U. """
OESA OF CRIME
IR RIARE INC
UNION SERW ICE
6 30.84
1_00
152.00
1.662.01
169.00
14.00
50.00
6.00
164.12
211.E6
4.650.0,
66.90
1.466.z5
40.00
20.06
30.00
9.9E
1.616.10
491.66
30.16
164.61
LC4.00
1.10`.12
659_71
2.164.CC
4,141.5C
34.00
966.54
64!.23
724.9[
146.45
2.310.GC
2.651.33
2,250_OC
24.03
200.00
75.00
6,453.11
Z66. 06
ZOO.UC
115.0[
1.411.41
200AC
1.923.41
60-CC
114.65
2t.SC
10.992.35
141.65
14.95
144.50
7,636.00
20.0E
21.16
25,993.01
250.00
396.91
50.00
675.00
ISO.00
10.00
360.00
ZIo.94
5.0E
214.76
25.00
5.11j9.09
292.00
500.00
R967 CITWG RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MAYN 6 YEN 6 V E N 0 0 A N A M E
NARRANI NILy p *IIATILN
DATE NFUUHEMEF
1212L /53
VISCOUNT NET
FINAL VITALS
6u.00
4O. lc
51.75
1235
11..00
14.70
21.00
46.00
111.25 15
684.23
50.0
65.660
64.9E
t5_00
2 20.00
5.46
211.553.14
z, i44.1c
05.1
z66.1
25.74
96.16
36_35
41.331.86
576.4E
11.894.44
32.04
41.50
202.01
705.62
57.52
72.00
6.04
3.375.06
313.66
207.43
67.20
612.91
45.00
2.031.91
70.0c
10.00
5.00
10.00
35.00
454.960.14
• RAGE
COPY w wA -r+.d A eFFTFA . YV<w
APPLICATION KNI ALCOMMAC eSISMARS YCTMMSI
i. TYRISI Of uCMUM Ill[ NO.
r« p.r.•A•a+ d ANEIl.4E SE�ee/ OIAPd
Ott SNIa la9r • Rla9
AEOOrt NO. -
1N1
CAL a� i�aV•i�o
s.<...�r. y4le.
..n.•.... ,...r».•
cone ><i!
14 '�vYd ArAE.l��
oar.
lures dwvMr r l.e..«
1
A.EA«I MMw Sr. 1E9A4
i leu.d
' T—, lw+H
1
S. NAMMSI W MfSECAII M
Ee.<a.. 0wa Zeea *
S T MSI d T4SNSACTIOWS1
le.c... De..
' f"
iFc
5RF.PPARD, aaanette,MARSehAtd Y.
DAl. SAD.
�S SO.pO 30
T 21
FAt A dp•• Pltsi & Nora
�v9x74'�t
50.00
S Saarlm d Wwnw.- rlr.lw and Lr�T
r
4111 eootbill Blvd., Dult9 A
o-,d aeh
NaronClgLaG uae Neo9e 91730
TOTAL
lea w
Ssaw
e 1 F,.-. L.. . ! An ..mnM• In
sb- Tvw 0 sH.a. 20- 134558 Cz 1•.aa1 4
t 1Nwl.nE Addr... 1.E a<rmr rra. 31 -NVn�w end Saw• n........
7722 nhaulK Aw.. L Panty. Ca. 917 iJ DWI.
9 Ha.. yes .•w !.m el a Noel 10 Nm. 1eu .wr mbl•a eey d lb p,l d r AkeAdie
1...rep. frond M w r.erMlwn Al M A nt rn
n �/ lamry ro Me AOl I�
11 !•— plrn YES' �M w b •mn• 9 er 10 ee a, Ml -.•<A Nall M dwm.d pail d All eppkcoe n
• 11 Appn.ml apr.w Ie 1. oey all b• all M. eeal.A.onen• N e Iet.— aM
bee., e. all rot ••elab m cau» w grlwr b W m1eM nl el M. qo -nae• el rb Al.eedk N. Comrol AO
ry STATE Of CApfCIANU Caeen el --- 5! ➢.BaAI Ii........ ..
"�.:.v: r.... � . ••.+- ,.fir,~
Ir
1• IMICANi jj,,
$10H HEn .Xt11L.- ....1.rt1f..... -i.�.. .......__ ... ..... .. ........ . _ ........ ... ...
.....
......................... .._ .................._, ........ .... ......... ............... ...... ..........
. ...
APPMATION BY TRANS"MOR
IS STATE p CALIFORNIA Cwnn d._SAh. YarnardlBD .............p.p .......
ew �ti.w✓ -
Mw - .r ,�.. ... � wa n 4w• v�0�.ar
Eb No wTl A &A.. TW U e sty D.erErRr V. 0.4
AprMd � R.evdN .wk..
f'd1HMn
......... cONEi MAItEB ........ {��.�.....__.___.....
^ brslMd...., .._..Nd.• ..............�.�..... .............. R.edN N.. .--------- .. ........
.
•
11
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ck:"yo
STAFF REPORTS °��.
DATE: December 21, 1983 — .3E
z
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager --- io
FROG'?: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: ENGINEEPTNG AND DESIGN SERVICES FOP THE RESURFACING
AND RECONSTRUCTION OF CHURCH STREET
Attached for Council approval is an agreement fnr ennineering and
design services to prepare construction plans, specifications and
estimates for the Resurfacing ar,d Reconstruction of Church Street
from Hellman Avenue to Archibald. This project has been included
in this year's budget for design and construction. The project
will be constructed with Development Funds accumulated as Gas Taxes
SS 325).
Three ennineering proposals have been received from 1) Alderman,
Swift and Lewis; 2) Hall and Foreman; and 3) Linville- Sanderson.
:r the order of the lowest to highest, the proposal amounts are:
1. U nville- Sanderson 3 Associates 513,970
2. -ail 8 Foreman 15,-,20
3, A.S.L. Consulting Engineers 18,300
RFCOMMENCATICN:
It is recommended that the Council approve an agreement. with
Linville- Sanderson and Associates to provide ennineering and design
services for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates
for the resurfacing and reconstruction of Church Street from Heilman
to Archibald Avenue.
Respectfully su itted,
L 11 *
Ci[ ngineer
LH:3'ri F: 4
r
Item No
L.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Description
CHURCH STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Summary of Engineering Proposals
(High) (Low`
^ ° ' H li F '11
Survey
'utility Research
Prepare A Maintain Design File
Construction Flans
Quantity 8 Cost Estimates
Specificaticns
Sails 8 Pavement Analysis
Coordination Meetinas
9. Construction Coordination
T,- AL
Alt. A Construction Survey
$3,500
S11,300
3,400
Included above
0
a 8 oreman Linvi e -Sande
n
53,300
S4,000
700
600
200
(Not mentioned)
5,600
4,100
800
700
1,040
900
2,630
3,000
350
(Included in items
Included above 400
518,300 `•15,020
(Not to exceed (Fixed rate)
@ hourly rate)
$122 /hr. $21750
Not to exceed (To be rene-
$3,000 gotiated upon
completion of
plans)
18 4)
670 •$13,970
(Not to exceed
@ hourly basis)
$55 /hr. S. Sup
5120 /hr. Field Crew
•
• ENG I NEEN I NI, SF. HVIC 1: I I,NTHACI
1'CH
STHF.F.'f IMPRUVEMI:NTS
IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA
CALTYURNIA
This CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of
1993, by and between the CITY OF NANCIIO CUCAMONGA, hereafter relered to as
°CITY" aryl LIWILLF.- SANDEHSON t. ASSOCIATES, hereinafter ielerrcd to a, "I',JN-
SULTANT".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Lrry intends to resurface and reconstruct Church Street
between Hellman and Archibald Avenues and
• WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has signified his w il lingness to undr•rt ikr the
Engineering work in connection therewith.
NOW, THEREFORE, CONSULTANT, for cunsiderations he,ernnl 1,r namf••1, .ut,ees
to perturm the following services:
I. Pre - design meeting with city st.,ll lo, review UI p,r,1, , .nil
obtain research data.
1. Complete preliminary surveys which will include Iopo ao.l crue•.-
sections between curb linos at maximum 5n font x.1,,1 u„ , I,tI,-
tional aec tiuns at inter5ec d tione, and ;:ubsta, Rol yr.nlr I, ,k
locations where additional tope and • n,a"-nr•• t t•,n:. w1 I L, 1•, r
formed.
J. Provide utility research for the prolPCt are,,.
4. Field review to determine areas where pavement shuuld be cao-
plete.ly removed and replaced.
5. Provide for soils testing for re,,ommenJefl scrod u,al ,ere ion
and overlay thickneem.
6. Prepare improvement plans on at) scale mylar plan ind p%11 l It-
sheet.
0
Survives coot inu ad;
7, Plot existing and pouposed sections using 1" a 10' borison-
tdl and I" - 1' vertical.
H. Prepare specifications and special provisions.
g. Attend coordination meetings with utility companies and city
staff,
10. Process improvement plans and specifications through city
engineering department for plan check process,
11. Upun city approval submit originals and specifications with
estimate of quantities and •nginser's estimate.
12. Attend pre- construction meetings and coordinate deslgn
�luw inq construction.
11. Prepare and maintain desiyn file. •
PANT A
Engineer's Fee
'''I". ip"I /11i01eCt Mdnaye r .. ..............................b 60 /hi
L
r
Pe inCipol /Survey Supee visor , . .............................'i
St /hr
Technicia n ................. ..............................5
2e/hr
Secretary .................................................
I IS;hr
I -man Survey Crew................ ........................5120
/hr
V renting .................. ...............................
At Coat
Soils Engihee rinq .............................
..........Time G
Mdteredls
L
r
0
PART e
Engineer's "Not -to- Exceed" Fee
Total "Not -to- Exceed" tee for Engineering and Surveying services
as outlined in this contract, except for construction staking Is$17,970.00.
PART C
Method of Payment
The ENGINEER shall submit invoices (or partial payerenl at rrwnthly
intervals for work accomplished at hourly rates. Each monthly rnvor.e
shall indenttfy the ch.u4es for particulal en4ineerin4 ercumlil t:.hed.
• PART D
TP.I mina tlOn
The righr is re::erved by tho t'tty to terminate the a4n•r rm•rit it
any time ul•on written notice to Lngineer to the event t u 14,ru'• t is .rny
pur UOn lharuul is tw be ebandoried 01 tndelinitely pwlP " °t'd, n rn th,
case the En4lneer's services, to the lud4mont ut the t'rty. u" %'W'Lr..-
tartory or because of the Enqineer' -s failure to proserutu tht• wank With
drlt4ence or within the time limits sped /teal; or beeaunr• nl Turin -, t
inability to perform. In any such case, the Enqineer ::Ir.rll In p.r of the
value of services rendered up to the time- of termination I.) i rural tso
the lump sum fee for elapsed time under this agreement. If the servunr.
of the Engineer are terminated for fault on his part., lho rt'y may pru-
cure the conplation of the services or work Err such manner at, it duemu
beet and shall charge to the Engineer any excess cost over that provided
for in the agreement or any dama9es the r'ity may eubat.n o by n u•un of
the default.
LJ
11
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
cuC"t ot4
197-
SUBJECT: Intent to Vacate North /South Alley located West of Center Avenue
and South of 25th Street
The owners of the property adjacent to the above described alley have
requested the alley be vacated. This alley is unpaved and is not required for
access to the properties.
The attached letter from the property owners indicates they intend to
construct a block wall and close access to help prevent crime in the area. A
map showing the property owners and the alley location is attached.
At their meeting of December 14, 1983, the Planning Cnrmission recommended
that City Council hold a public hearing. The attached resolution sets the
public hearing date on January 18, 1984.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the
public hearing date for January 18, 1984.
Respectfully sub 'tied,
L8 BK:jaa
Attachment
:J
RESOLUTION NO..12- 21 -08M-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE NORTH /SOUTH ALLEY
LOCATED WEST OF CENTER AVENUE AND SOUTH OF 25TH STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under
Section 8300, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the
Street Vacation Act of 1941.
SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to
vacate the north south alley located west of Center Avenue and south of 25th
Street as shown on Map No. V -032 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a
legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by
reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 18th
day of anuary 983, at 7:30 p.m., in the Lions Park Community Center
Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time
and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the
purpose of its determining whether said City street is necessary for present
or prospective street purposes.
• SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices
to be poste conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof
proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 30
feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall
have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in
lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE
STREET ".
SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations
and exceptions any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk
shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published
10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily
Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of - Ontario,
a i ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Jon 0. Mike—T—s,— Rayor
EXHIBIT "A"
That certain North /South alley (20 feet wide) in Block 59 of the North 40 Cucamonga Subdivision it the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, as per plat filed in Map Book 4, Page 8,
Records of the County Recorder of said County.
•
•
•
A
V -032
1
�i srarer
01 y rr) n I e.
1 Y9 E7 r3 Y! Yi 19 I) 17 q ,
7 ;
Y 30 Y9 to r. tr 13
to Is
I .
I
- I -
.. .wM .... ..... r.yi .0 a mA ..Nii 'H�►.
to
Z 5" STRELET .1
i
TO BE VACATED: w g 0@ 0 M
x
v
W
L
W
U
CITY OF RANCH titl
G CUCA�IONGA ALL e
�. ENGINEERING DIVISION ' T
VICINITY AIAP ll\,il
page
VACATI
^
e�
c
I r
Yl
YI
19 j IF
IS is
1
—J
r
130
to 1 E9 '
21
YE
c�v��I
n `i�
—
6,
V
1
It
to A
I
wool
�'
44
4
TO BE VACATED: w g 0@ 0 M
x
v
W
L
W
U
CITY OF RANCH titl
G CUCA�IONGA ALL e
�. ENGINEERING DIVISION ' T
VICINITY AIAP ll\,il
page
VACATI
THE ROCK OUTREACH
P. O. Box B.C.
CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
(714) 987 -1365
October S. 1983
To: Planning Comnissien of Rancho Cucamonga
Rd: Request to Acquire Allay -way
To Whom it may concern:
This request in being submitted on behalf of residents owning land
adjacent to the allay-way located between 25tb 6 24th Struts "at of
Center An.. Assassor'a sup book 209 page 10 of San Bernardino County.
The request is to permit the Undersigned owners to acquire the
appropriate part of the ellq -way u part of each omen own property.
We are in one accord as neighbors to recelve this property that is 20'
mid* ad dividing it in half so that each property owner would receive
10' each.
The proposed alleyway is not am, nor has it been for several years
a utilized through way for residents in the araa. On the contrary, this
• alleyway has been a hideout and refuge for same delinquents and addition-
ally an eyesore because of its enkspt condition.
Each individual homeowner in this proposal has plans to upgrade and
utilize this acquired lad. if approved, ■o that the community can continue
to upgrade and beautify its surrwdiog arms. We intend to construct a
block wall •o as to beautify our property, and to help crime rate by
closing exits.
As neighbors ad citizens of Rancho Cucamonga we would like for you
to piazza consider this proposal in all seriousness, as we the homeowners
are anxious to begin landscaping, fencing ate..
Respectfully,
V
Uaniel Mendez Lot's p 1
President of the Rock Church
Signed property owners 6 Church
bordering such property.
6 17
i
Severo Martinet I Lot p 18 ed
•
Is
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
ce
VE
x
Z
SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 8100, Real Property Improvement Contract and
Lien Agreement and Storm Drain Maintenance Agreement submitted by
Farmer Jack's Nursery Land Company and located on the north side of
Foothill Blvd., west side of Ramona Avenue
Parcel Map 8100 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission for the
division of 8.92 acres into 2 parcels on September 14, 1983, and is located on
the north side of Foothill Blvd., west side of Ramona Avenue.
Off -site improvements will be constructed at time of building permit issuance.
A Storm Drain Maintenance Agreement has been submitted by the developer to
provide for the maintenance of the existing drainage channel and is attached
for signature.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
Parcel Map 8100 and authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign same
and approving the resolution accepting the Real Property Improvement Contract
and Lien Agreement from Farmer Jacks's Nursery Land Company.
Respectfully subm' ted,
L W .BK: Jaa
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 12- 21 -12CR
0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8100
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8100)
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 81UU submitted by Farmer Jack's
Nursery Land Co. and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of
Foothill Blvd., west side of Ramona Avenue, being a division of a portion of
the South 112 of the West 112 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 2, T. I S., R. 7 W., San Bernardino Meridian, County of San
Bernardino, State of California was approved by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 8100 is the final map of the division of
land aporoved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8100 be and the same
is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record. •
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Jon 0. Mi a s, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasserman,
jaa
•
RESOLUTION No. 1,3.- 7.1 =t3CR
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM FARMER
JACKS'S NURSERY LAND COMPANY FOR PARCEL MAP 8100 AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
WHEREAS, Parcel Map 8100 located on the north side of Foothill Blvd.,
west of side of Ramona Avenue, submitted by Farmer Jack's Nursery Land Company
was approved on December 21, 1983.; and
WHEREAS, Installation of a landscaped median island established as
prerequisite to recordation of said map has been met by entry into a Real
Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Farmer Jack's Nursery Land
Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES: •
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, ity er
jaa
Jon 5. Mike s, Mayor J
t7
J
7-,El,l 7<.T // H-
PARCEL MAP NO. 8/00
ICCT- L� BLVD
�Olv
llky
ry
•
•
•
Yll ll� 514Z7"
.
'.Zy,
/�
ICCT- L� BLVD
�Olv
llky
ry
•
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P.OBox 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• IMPROVEMENT ANO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR (OPEN CHANNEL) PARCEL MAP 8100
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and
entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and
Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as City, by and between said City and
Earme_rs Jacks Nurser v Land Co hereinafter referred to as the Developer.
Tise Claremont, General Partner
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, a temporary open channel exists along the easterly boundary
of parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8100; and
WHEREAS, being an improvement requirement of said City for the sa
map, the Developer shall maintain the said channel until such time
Permanent stormdrain pipe facilities are constructed along the chann
alignment; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of maintenan a
security, as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed
to be sufficient to guarantee continual maintenance of the Channel.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the city and the
Developer as follows:
• 1. The Developer agrees to maintain the Channel, to the satisfaction
of the City, at no expense to the City. Such maintenance shall
include the yearly cleaning of the Channel bottom and said
slopes, cleaning of debris from the Channel, cleaning of culverts
across Foothill Boulevard and restoration of any shoulder area
erosion. All such maintenance shall be done prior to the first
day of November each year. Developer shall further perform such
regular maintenance as may be required for the normal operation
of the Channel. In the event an emergency situation arises
concerning the Channel, the City may require the Developer to
perform reasonable maintenance activities within twenty -four (24)
hours from the receipt of written demand therefore from the City.
Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and
against any and all liability arising from Developer's
maintenance of the Channel as provided herein.
3. If after thirty (30) days following notification by City of
deficient maintenance of the Channel, the Developer fails or
neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the
City shall have the right at any time to cause work to be done by
any lawful means, and thereupon to use the hereinafter stated
cash security and /or to recover from said Developer the full cost
and expense incurred in so doing. Developer shall be billed for
said costs and shall make restitution to the City within thirty
(30) days of date of billing, and /or replace said cash securities
f
used. Should Developer fail to make said restitution, within the
time alloted then the City will cause a lien to be filed, for
said restitution plus any and all reasonable attorney fees, •
against said developer on the real property described as follows:
Parcel 2 of Parcel map No. 8100 as recorded in Book
Page office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino
County, iornia.
a. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect from the
date hereof until notice by City that construction of stormdrain
pipe facilities, replacing the channel, a, a completed and
accepted for maintenance by said City. At the time said
maintenance security shall be returned to Developer and this
agreement shall terminate.
5. The mzinte -once security is to be furnished by Developer to
guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement and shall be
subject to approval by the City attorney. The principal amount
of said maintenance security shall not be less than the amount
shown below:
Maintenance Security Submitted:
Total Cash $2,000.00
IN WITNESS pEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to
be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the •
dates set ��frrorth opposite their signatures:
`'Ma
0rl JAe `
'71Cr C6 - DEVELOPER
i
By AcFTi P, J— Date
Witness Date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
Attest
Lauren asserman
City Clerk
Approved
to
�ity Attorney
i
Date
•
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
and
WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P. 0. Boa 007
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91770
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CO:TRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of , 19_1 by and between Farmers
Jacks Nursery Land Co. (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "),
Tise Claremont, General Partner
and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City'), provides as
follows:
WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the
recordation of Parcel Map 0100, the City requires the
• construction of missing off-site street improvements Including
one -half landscaped median Island adjacent to the prooerty to be
developed; and
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction
of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the
City; and
WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement
provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring
the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to
the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement
shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements
if the Developer falls or neglects to do so and that the City
shall have a lien upon the real pr9perty hereinafter described as
security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due
City.
I
— Y�
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE:
1. The Developer hereby agrees t,:at it will install
off -site street improvements including one -half landscaped median
island in accordance and compl lance with all applicable
ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in
effect at the time of the installation. Said improvements shall
be installed upon and along Foothill Blvd.
2. The installation of said improvements shall be
completed no later than one (II year following written notice to
,hc Developer from the City to commence installation of the
same. installation of said improvments shall be at no expense to
the City,
3. In the event the Developer shall tail or refuse to
complete the Installation of said improvements in a timely
manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the •
Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon
the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements
and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the
Developer.
A. To secure the performance by the Developer of the
terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the
repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in
completing said improvements upon default by the Developer
hereunder, th. n.veloper does by these presents grant, bargain,
sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described
real property situated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit:
Parcels I and 2 of Parcel Map 8I00 as recorded in look ,
►apes official records of San Bernardino County,
Gllforo
2
� Y'
•
5. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes
• described above.
6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shell faithfully
perform all of the acts and things by it to be done under this
Agreement, then this conveyance shall be :old, otherwise, it
shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall
be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and
the rignts and obligations of the parties with respect thereto
shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code or the
State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining
to mortgages on real property.
7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure
to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto.
•
B.
To the extent
required to give effect of this
Agreement
as a ma r tgage,
the term "Developer" shall be
"mortgagor"
and the City shall
o! the "mortgagee" as those terms
are used in
the the Civil Code
of the State of California and any
other statute
pertaining to mortages
on real property.
I*
9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City
is enti1.led to recover from the Developer hereunder or to
foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable
attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court.
_ r�
J
J
r 1
U
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
C�:CA140
-p SY
F � 2
TO: City Council a ^d City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 8106 submitted by Daon Corporation and
located on the north side of Arrow between Red Oak and Utica
Avenues
Parcel Map 8106 was tentatively approved by Planning Ccmmission for the
division of 7.90 acres of lard into two parcels on August 24, 1983.
Off -site construction has been completed under a previous recorded map.
Additinally, C.C.6R.s submitted by the developer have been approved by the
City Attorney and are attached for signature.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
Parcel Map 8106 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same mao.
Respectfully submitted,
ell
LBVK:jaa
Attachment
• RESOLUTION N0. ..,1?�1_89CR"
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8106
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8606)
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8106 submitted by Daon
Corporation and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of Arrow
Route between Utica and Red Oak Avenues, being a division of Lot 1 of Tract
No. 11700 as per map recorded in Book 157, Pages 75 and 76, Office of County
Recorder, San Bernardino County, State of California, was approved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 8106 is the final map of the division of
land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of `che requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8106 be and the same
is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
• PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Jon D. Mikels, ayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk'
jaa
r ,\
t
0 • 0
-••-
TENTATIVE
w •
PARCEL MAP N0. 8106
_.
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
—
�:�� �
o? H.O N • N. w rN place Or111.01 q<0.... or iM [o..n
i �� 4/4 LJ r. i'1n
••�• •
wit I t
-7; =�j
t
,....
fill
w
�
C
�,
"
'4 � — �"_�' '1
_:>: � �' yr_ -`: ✓l I
- - - � r�''S"lW;.�.._. i : ,/•�_ ,'.` : a::.� :, _
,.__ � . _
.. i :
�.
„ter-_- .
M -i• "+.. .•
s :•�.
>.. o_r[-
��__' -'a -.mow •I�
_ _. _ _ r,L. __. _. ... __ -. _. -;
--.._
('.i.�ia IiLL
LJMr
07 -(9- 222)110983
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
DRUMMY GARRETT KING c HARRISON
P.O. Box 5080 •
Costa Mesa, California 92626
ATTN: Mr. Paul K. Watkins
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS;
DEANNEKATION; AND
GRANTS OF EASEMENT
(Arrow Industrial Condominiums)
This First Amendment to Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions, and Restrictions; Deannexation; and Grants of
Easement (Arrow Industria' Condominiums) ( "Amendment ") is made
on 1983 in Newport Beach, California by and
between DOON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (as successor -
in- interest to Rancho Cucamonga Business Park DiB, a dissolved
California joint venture formerly composed of Daon Cprporation
and Barton Partners, a California general partnership) ( "Daon ")
all those persons shown as "Owners of Constructed Units" on the
signature pages of this Amendment (the "Owners of Constructed
Units "), and Arrow Owners Association, a California nonprofit
mutual benefit corporation (the "Association "), who agree as •
follows:
1. This Amendment is made with reference to the
following facts:
A. "Arrow Industrial Condominiums" is an
unfinished 70 -unit real estate development located in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California
(the "Original Condominium Project ").
B. Forty -Three (43) of the units at the
Original Condominium Project have been constructed (the
"Constructed Units "). The Constructed Units are more particu-
larly described on Exhibit A attached hereto. The record fee
owners of the Constructe Units are shown as the Owners of
Constructed Units on the signature pages hereof.
C. Condominium Unit Nos. 44 through 70 at
the Original Condominium Project are owned in fee by Daon and
have not been constructed. The land underlying said uncon-
structed "Unit Nos. 44 through 70 is unimproved (the "Unimproved
Property"). A metes and bounds description of the Unimproved
Property is set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Original
Condominium Project is presently made up of the Constructed Units
and the Unimproved Property. •
-1-
• D. Daon has determined that it is econom-
ically infeasible to develop the Unimproved Property as condo-
minium units. Instead, Daon (with the consent and approval of
the Owners of Constructed Units and the Association) intends to
restructure the Original Condominium Project (1) by making the
Constructed Units a self- contained development (and so that each
owner of a Constructed Unit will have an undivided 1 /43rd
interest in the common area) (the "New Condominium Development ")
and (2) by making the Unimproved Property a separate legal lot
for future use by Daon. This restructuring is hereinafter
referred to as the "Restructured Development."
E. The Original Condominium Project is
encumbered by a certain Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and
Restrictions made on April 8, 1981 and recorded on June 12, 1981
as Instrument No. 81- 129305 in the Official Records of the San
Bernardino County, California Recorder (the "CCiR's "). Daon
(with the consent and approval of the Owners of Constructed Units
and the Association) intends to amend the CCiR's to deannex the
Unimproved Property from the jurisdiction of the CCLR's, to
adjust the voting power, the assessments percentages, and the
common area interests percentages.
F. Incident to accomplishing the goal of
• the Restructured Development, Daon intends to grant to the Owners
of the Constructed Units and to the Association a certain appur-
tenant easement over a portion of the Unimproved Property for the
purpose of maintaining a monument sign and for the purpose of
maintaining water lines. The Owners of the Constructed Units and
the Association intend to grant to Daon a certain appurtenant
easement over a portion of the New Condominium Development for
drainage, for access and for ingress and egress purposes.
G. The Association is charged with the
responsibility of managing, administering, maintaining, and
preserving the common area of the Arrow Industrial Condominiums.
B. For value received, the parties agree
as hereinafter provided.
0
2. The Unimproved Property is hereby deannexed
from the Original Condominium Project. The Unimproved Property
shall no longer be subject to any of the terms, covenants, condi-
tions, restrictions, and provisions of the CCiR's. The
Constructed Units shall hereafter make up the New Condominium
Development which shall continue to be known as "Arrow Industrial
Condominiums" and shall be a self- contained project.
-2-
3. Each of the owners of the Constructed Units
shall and does hereby have an undivided 1 /43rd interest in and to
the common area of the New Condominium Project and each of the
owners of the Constructed Units shall no longer have an undivided
1 /70th interest in and to the common area of the Original Condo-
minium Project.
4. Exhibit B to the CCiR's is hereby deleted in
its entirety and Exhibit C - Voting Power and Percentage of
Assessments attachereto shall and does replace and supersede
Exhibit B to the CCiR's. Exhibit C - Voting Power and Percentage
of Assessments shall and does here y establish the voting power
and the percentage of total z- essments for each of the Owners of
Constructed Units in the New Condominium Development.
5. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5, all of
the Unimproved Property shall be deemed to be the dominant
tenement and that certain portion of the New Condominium
Development depicted by crosshatching on the map attached hereto
as Exhibit D (the "Paragraph 5 Easement Area ") shall be deemed to
be the servient tenement. The easement granted in this Paragraph
5 is appurtenant to the Unimproved Property. The Owners of the
Constructed Units and the Association hereby grant to Daon (and
to Daon's successors-in- interest on the Unimproved Property as
well as to their clients, patrons, customers, visitors, vendors,
invitees, licensees, and quests) an easement over and onto the
Paragraph 5 Easement Area for drainage, for access, and for
ingress to and egress from the Unimproved Property. The Owners
of the Constructed Units and the Association acknowledge and
acres that the Unimproved Property shall be subdivided in the
future and that there shall be increased use of this easement in
the future. Such increased use is not expected to materially
exceed the use which would have occurred if the Unimproved
Property had been developed with Units 44 through 70 and marketed
to purchasers of such Units. The owner(s) of this easement shall
share in the maintenance and repair of the Paragraph 5 Easement
Area in proportion to use and as the Association and the then
owners of the Unimproved Property shall agree.
6. For the purposes of this Paragraph 6, the New
Condominium Development shall be deemed to be the dominant tene-
ment and that certain portion of the Unimproved Property depicted
by crosshatching on the map attached hereto as Exhibit E (the
"Paragraph 6 Easement Area ") shall be deemed to-Fe -the
tenement. The easement granted in this Paragraph 6 is
appurtenant to the New Condominium Development. Daon hereby
grants to the owners of the Constructed Units and to the
Association a right to maintain and repair the existing water
lines serving the New Condominium Development and located within
the Paragraph 6 Easement Area and a right to maintain and repair
the existing concrete and river -rock monument sign located within
the southerly portion of the Paragraph 6 Easement Area. The
-3-
r-
r
0
1J
•
• easement granted in this Paragraph 6 includes a right to replace
the water lines at the same location as presently exists for such
water lines at no expense or liability to the owner(s) of the
Unimproved Property and a right to replace the concrete and
river -rock monument sign, . so long as the replacement sign is
substantially identical in size, color, material composition,
design, language, and location as the present sign.
•
LI
7. This Amendment shall and does bind and inure to
the benefit of the respective heirs, personal representatives,
successors -in- interest, and assigns of the parties hereto.
S. All exhibits to which reference is made herein
are hereby deemed incorporated in this Amenoment by this
reference.
The signature pages to this Amendment are attached hereto and are
hereby deemed incorporated by this reference.
-a-
7 '
J
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTED UNITS
All that certain land situated in the State of California,
County of San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, described
as follows:
PARCEL NO. 1:
Units 1 through 43, inclusive, as
certain Condominium Plan recorded
No. 81- 129304, of Official Records
State of California.
PARCEL NO. 2:
shown and defined on that
June 12, 1981, as Instrument
of San Bernardino County,
An undivided 43/70ths interest in and to Lot 1 of Tract No. 11700,
as shown on a Map recorded in Book 157, pages 75 and 76 of Maps,
records of said County, California, together with all improvements
thereon, excepting therefrom Condominium Units 1 through 70, in-
clusive, located thereon.
PARCEL NO. 3:
An exclusive easement appurtenant to each of the Units for the
use and occupancy of those portions of the Restricted Common Area
designated in the Declaration of Restrictions and shown on the
Condominium Plan for each of the Units.
SAID PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THOSE CERTAIN COVENANTS, CONDITIONS
AND RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN THAT CERTAIN DECLARATION OF
RESTRICTIONS RECORDED ON March 9, 1981, as Instrument No. 81- 049396,
Official Records and recorded June 12, 1981, as Instrument No.
81- 129305, Official Records OF SAID COUNTY, ALL OF WHICH BY THIS
REFERENCE THERETO ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY INCORPORATED IN AND MADE
A PART HEREOF, AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN.
EXHIBIT A
•
•
•
9 EXHIBIT B
UNIMPROVED PROPERTY
The land referred to herein is a portion of Lot 1, Tract No. 11700, as
per map recorded in Book 157, pages 75 and 76, in the Office of the County
Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest comer of Section 12, Township I South, Range 7
West, San Bernardino Meridian, said point also being the centerline inter-
section of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, as shown on Parcel Map 6206,
as per map recorded in Book 59, pages 91 -95 of Parcel Maps, in the Office
of the Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; thence
Southerly along the centerline of Haven Avenue, said centerline also being
the Westerly line of said Section 12, South 0'10'24" East, a distance of
2660.50 feet, to the centerline intersection of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route;
thence Easterly along the centerline of Arrow Route, South 89'17'12" East,
a distance of 1069.50 feet; thence North 0'42'48" East, a distance of 50.00
feet to the Southwest corner of Tract No. 11700, said point being on the
Northerly line of Arrow Route; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of
• said tract, South 89017'12" East, a distance of 411.25 feet, said point
also being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 0'42'48" East, a dis-
tance of 123.00 feet; thence South 89 °17'12" East, a distance of 141.00
feet; thence North 0'42'48" East, a distance of 295.50 feet, to a point on
the Northerly line of said tract; thence along the Northerly line of said
tract, South 89 °17'12" East, a distance of 270.25 feet, to the Northeast
comer of said tract; thence along the Easterly line of said tract, South
0'42'48" West, a distance of 418.50 feet, to the Southeast comer of said
tract, said point being on the Northerly line of Arrow Route; thence along
the Southerly line of said tract. North 89 °17'12" West, a distance of
411.25 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
11
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT C 0
VOTING POWER AND PERCENTAGE OF ASSESSMENTS
The column at the right of this page designates the voting
power allocated to each Member and the percentage of the total
assessments for the Subject Property that each Owner must pay.
Continued. . .
EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 Pages
VOTING POWER.
HORIZONTAL
(Number of Votes);
UNIT NO.
SQUARE FEET
ASSESSMENTS PEPCENTAGE
1
2959
4.096
2
3245
4.491
3
1608
2.220
4
1610
2.228
5
1610
2.228
6
1610
2.228
7
1610
2.228
8
1608
2.225
9
3245
4.492
10
2959
4.096
11
2690
3.723
12
2706
3.745
13
1338
1.852
•
14
1341
1.856
15
1341
1.856
16
1341
1.856
17
1341
1.856
18
1322
1.830
19
1090
1.508
20
1105
1.532
21
1105
1.532
22
1105
1.532
23
1105
1.532
24
1105
1.532
25
1105
1.532
26
1105
1.532
27
1090
1.508
28
1322
1.830
29
1341
1.856
30
1341
1.856
31
1341
1.856
32
1341
1.856
33
1338
1.852
34
2706
3.745
35
2690
3.723
36
2690
3.723
37
2706
3.745
38
1338
1.852
•
39
1341
1.856
Continued. . .
EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 Pages
UNIT NO.
•
HORIZONTAL
SQUARE FEET
40
1341
41
1341
42
1341
43
1322
TOTAL:
72,239 Square Feet
C
VOTING POWER
(Number of Votes);
ASSESSMENTS PERCENTAGE
1.856
1.856
1.856
1.830
100.000
NO—E: Developer does not hereby warrant that the
Units, as constructed, will have exactly
the same number of horizontal square feet
as shown on this Exhibit.
_2_
EXHIBIT C_ Page 2 of 2 Pages
J��
552
0
In In
vt
I
EXHIBIT D
Mm
41, 2S'
.3
sl000. !%IS- CURB so 0c; @00,
<
822so,
ARROW ROUTE
Ck I!Ki!Fr -.60, WIDE DRIVEWAY
PA
LU
,,, oj
W.
% u
P.
W
I
EXHIBIT D
Mm
41, 2S'
.3
sl000. !%IS- CURB so 0c; @00,
<
822so,
ARROW ROUTE
Ck I!Ki!Fr -.60, WIDE DRIVEWAY
PA
LU
,,, oj
W.
% u
/-q UTICA AVE.
1> n0 so'
A
J
R °_O OAK A`/E•
EXHI
Sa
D.
m
0 ^�
L
C �
=m
mo
z
i.
A
NF
418.50
123.00'
104. po'
dIB SO'
4(68 So
EXHIBIT F
i.
Z.—
� IN
n N
8 0
�
mA
V
1m
+
J
D
A
p
m�
m
N
A
o
D
a
N0<
A
A
I �
y
a
0
a
m
S.
N
50 CO
n
AA
c+
cA
0
a1
A
n
jm
J
R °_O OAK A`/E•
EXHI
Sa
D.
m
0 ^�
L
C �
=m
mo
z
i.
A
NF
418.50
123.00'
104. po'
dIB SO'
4(68 So
EXHIBIT F
i.
Z.—
� IN
n N
8 0
�
V
1m
+
J
p
AN
n
D
a
N
A
A
a
a
m
N
50 CO
J
R °_O OAK A`/E•
EXHI
Sa
D.
m
0 ^�
L
C �
=m
mo
z
i.
A
NF
418.50
123.00'
104. po'
dIB SO'
4(68 So
EXHIBIT F
i.
Z.—
� IN
n N
8 0
0
•
09
CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
F
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
la--
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7731, bonds and agreement and summarily
vacation of a portion of 7th Street submitted by SDC /Green Tree -
Rancho
Parcel Map 7731 located on the west side of Haven Avenue between 6th and 7th
Streets for the division of 33.3 acres of land into 6 parcels was tentatively
approved by Planning Commission on February 9, 1983.
SDC /Green Tree - Rancho, developer, has submitted bonds and an agreement in the
following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: 5226,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: 5113,000.00
Additionally, a 3 -foot portion of 7th Street adjacent to Parcel Map 1131 is to
be vacated prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. This 3 -foot vacation makes
the ultimate width of 7th Street 27 feet from centerline to property line in
conformance with the Industrirl cn -,ific Plan.
REC"ENOATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing
the acceptance of Parcel Map, bonds and agreement. It is further recommended
that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the vacation of a
portion of 7th Street and authorizing the City Clerk to record same.
*BBK lly s bmitted,
Attachments
i
w:
L
i
i
;
vpb r
. --I;
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA
w
N�
11
title,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP �,,
—_
page
RESOLUTION NO. 12.21 -20CR-
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7731,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7731), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7731, submitted by SDC /Green Tree -
Rancho Subdivider, and consisting of 6 parcels, located on the west side of
Haven Avenue between 6th and 7th Streets, being a portion of Lot "D ", North
Cucamonga Townsite, as per plat recorded in Book 13 of Maps, Page 15, Records
of said County was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the
State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of
Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7731 is the Final Map of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map
offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFOPE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
1. That the offers f,^r dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf
of said City; and
2. That said Parcel Map No. 7731 be and the same is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized
to present same to the County Recorder to be filed
for record.
PASSLU, APPRUVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D, Mikels, Mayor-
ATTEST:
19 Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
j as
'71. 1
RESOLUTION NO. CR
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
A PORTION OF 7TH STREET IN CONNECTION WITH PARCEL MAP
7731
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and
Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized
to summarily vacate a portion of 7th Street in connection with Parcel Map 7731
hereinafter more particularly described; and
WhEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said
portion of 7th Street in unnecessary for present or prospective public street
purposes because it has been superceded by relocation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby ma escT —irs order vacating that portion of street as shown on V -033 which
is further described in a legal description attached and marked Exhibit "A"
and by reference made a part thereof.
• SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded,
said port io�th Street no longer constitutes a street or public utility
easement.
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
resolution to e recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Is Lauren M. Wasserman, ity er
{aa
Jon u. Hi a s, ayor
i;
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of Lot D, of North Cucamonga Townsite, in the City of Rancho •
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per plate recorded
in Book 13, Page 15 of Maps, Records of said County described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of a line parallel with and 30.00 feet Southerly
of the centerline of 7th Street (formerly 20th Street), with a line parallel
with and 557.80 feet Easterly of the centerline of Center Avenue; thence along
the last mentioned parallel line North 01 16' 00" Nest 3.00 feet to a line
parallel with and 27.00 feet Southerly of said centerline of 7th Street;
thence along said parallel line South 890 52' 32" East 567.53 feet to a
tangent curve concave to the South having a radius of 496.00 feet; thence
Easterly along said tangent curve 44.38 feet through a central angle of 5° 07'
35" to a reverse curve concave to the North, having a radius of 504.00 feet;
thence Easterly along said reverse curve 13.34 feet through a central of I-
30' 59" to first mentioned parallel line; thence along said parallel line
North 896 52' 32" West 625.13 feet to the point of beginning.
•
•
!i
V -033
-SURVEY (t HAVEN AVENUE
30' ;30,
GK JF I
EXHIBIT 'A
a� '
N
T V
h r Y ♦
F- r�T
Ld X�Is
��
N, N v
i
SCALE I' loo
•
slim
W.
N zl z
i
I
I
eoe
i N 0' 16 00" W
N o' 1v' 00 "w
7044'
n
h
N
r� CENTER AVENUE
N 0' 14' 00, W
EXHIBIT 'A
a� '
0
A
J
rTTV nn o n A7rvn rT!r A MnUCA
STAFF REPORT
_ y
F 6 I:
1977
December 21, 1983
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Messer
City Manager
SUBJECT: Recommended Revis on of Personnel Rules and Regulations with
Respect to Clarification of the Status of Part Time Employsea
It is recommended that the following sections of the Personnel Rules and
Regulations be revised:
1.3.2 "Part -Time Employee"
3.3.0 "Benefits"
3.3.2 "Sick Leave"
The primary reason for the changes in the rules is to proviae proportional
vacation and sick leave benefits for permanent part -time employees. At the
present time the city has only one employee in this classification, however,
that individual is working on a year -round basis for approximately 20 hours
per week. It is significant to note that with the change in the personnel
rules, permanent part -time shall be paid for holidays, up to one -half of
insurance benefits if requested, and up to one -half of the benefits for
vacation and sick leave. No other fringe benefits are to be provided for
permanent part -time employees.
If the City Council is in concurrence with the revisions to the personnel
rules, the following should be adopted to replace current rule 1.3.2:
"Part -time Employee" means an employee who works less than thirty
nine (39) hours per week. Such employees shall fall into two
groups, as hereinafter defined.
'Regular Part -time Employee shall be those who work for the City
regularly, but seasonally, not every week or every month, and who
return to regular part -time or seasonal positions annually for more
than one year, and who are designated as such by a department head.
"Permanent part -time employee" shall be those who work for the City
regularly, year around, for from twenty (20) to thirty nine (39)
hours per week.
i
Continued....
Revision of Personnel Rules 2 December 21, 1983
"Both regular and permanent part -time employees shall be eligible
for in -range pay rate increases as set out in these rules.
"Regular part -time employees shall not be eligible to accrue or to
utilize sick leave, holiday pay, vacation, insurance, or retirement
benefits, or other any other employee benefits.
"Permanent part -time employees shall receive half benefits, In that
they shall accrue and may utilize sick leave and vacation at half
,ithe rate of N11 - time employe #s. Such permanent part -time
Ic "employees shall also be paid foreholidays; the City shall pay for
insurance benefits for such employees at half the rate of full -time
employees; but no retirement benefits shall accrue, nor shall
retirement payments be made by the City for the account of any
�. permanent part -time employee."
The last paragraph of rule 3.3.0 must be revised as follows:
"Regular part -time, seasonal, relief, and temporary employees shall
not be eligible to accrue or to utilize vacation."
It is also recommended that 3.3.2 in the second paragraph be revised as •
follows:
"Regular part -time, seasons, relief, and temporary employees shall
not be eligible to accrue or to utilize sick leave."
It is recommended that the changes outlined above be approved in order to
clarify sick leave and other benefits to be earned by permanent part -time
employees.
LMM:mk
LI 1
•
0
•
49
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Robert A. Rizzo,
Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A POLICY ESTABLISHING A COMPENSATION PLAN FOR
EMPLOYEES ASSIGNED STANDBY STATUS DURING EMERGENCY ALERTS
AND NON - WORKING HOURS.
v �
•aN
1977
Many time in the past six years non - management employees have been requested
to standby during emergency alerts and non - working hours. They have received
no compensation for this time away from the ,Job site when on call for such
situations as: placing barricades on flooded streets, cleaning up after heavy
rains or windstorms, replacing downed signs, and a variety of other emergency
alerts which require them to be available during non - working hours.
The item of standby compensation time has been discussed before, however no
formal action has been taken. With the wet and windy season approaching it
appears an appropriate time for us to consider establishing some type of
standby status pay schedule to compensate those who spend their non - working
hours on call.
In a survey of standby time pay we have found each of the other West End
cities have compensation plans for employees on call; each are different and
some, very complicated. The common factors in all plans are:
1. Some portion of employee's salary calculated into added pay
standby status.
2. Once called, an employee receives a two hour minimum at 1 1/2
regular hourly salary.
3. Employee assigned standby status must be within a certain
response time to city yard.
4. Standby status is assigned on a rotating basis and by a
designate of City Manager.
In looking at the above factors and considering the needs of Rancho Cucamonga
the following recommended standby compensation policy has been developed:
- J
Continued....
December 21, 1983
Standby Compensation
Page 2
•
A. Employees assigned to standby status will be paid 5% above
their regular weekly salary while on standby status.
B. Standby status will be assigned in one week increments (Monday
12 noon through Monday 11:59 a.m.). If employee is assigned
standby status any time during the week, they will receive
compensation for standby status the entire week.
C. Once called, employee will receive a two -hour minimum assign-
ment at 1 1/2 times their regular hourly salary.
D. Any employee assigned standby status must be within 20 minutes
response time of city yard during the entire on call period.
E. Standby status will be assigned on a rotating basis by a
designate of the City Manager.
This policy will require no new funding to be added to our overtime budget.
The policy calls for concerned departments to work within their overtime
budget previously approved by City Council. Additionally, this matter has •
been discussed with the Maintenance employees (group most affected), and they
have indicated this standby plan was acceptable to them.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free
to contact me.
Thank you.
RAR:mk
•
J
A
7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager 1
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer�'f
SUBJECT: Bond Release y
Tract 9658 - located at the Northwest corner of Madrone and 9th Street
OWNER: Richwood Development
2305 Monleato Drive
San Marino, California 91108
Monument Bond $2,500.00
Certification from the project engineer indicates that all final
monuments have been set and he has been paid in full.
Vineyard Avenue Improvement Project
19""
OWNER: United States Fidelity 6 Guaranty Co.
P. 0. Box 4250
Fullerton, California 91631
Faithful Performance Bond $241,564.50
On December 7, 1983 City Council accepted the Vineyard Avenue Improvement
Project and authorized the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion. It is recommended that City Council release the Faithful
Performance Bond.
M.S. 77 -0517 - located on Vivienda Street, west of Haven Avenue
OWNER: Peter W. Smits
10478 Vivienda Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Labor and Materials Bond $5,830.00
x
0
•
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
i0i
1977
SUBJECT: Release Bond for Solen Enterprises and accept bond and agreement
from Fontana Paving for Parcel Map 6544 located on the north side
of 6th Street, east of Haven Avenue
The subject project street improvements are complete and acceptable except for
a slight invert in the street section.
The developer's surety has requested that the improvement bond be released and
the developer's contractor has agreed to accept responsibility for correcting
the above deficiency.
Due to the nature of deficiency and the corrective measures required, i.e., it
has no affect on the usefullness of the street and should be corrected in
warmer weather (Summer). The contractor has agreed to post a bond and enter
into a six -month agreement to insure corrective measures at a more suitable
time.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council release the performance bond ($30,000.00)
for Solen Enterprises, developer, for Parcel Map 6544 and accept reduced bond
($10,000.00) and agreement for corrective paving from Fontana Paving,
contractor.
Res ectfully submitted,
[LB MP:jaa
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO.-12-21-QM
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 6544
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on
December 21, 1983, by Fontana Paving as developer, for the improvement of
public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Haven
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning
Commission, Parcel Map 6544; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by
good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
• Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, ano ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
on a s, ayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
jaa
•
is
rT nV a A MrVn rT1r n xanMrn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
yv T
�T
07;
SUBJECT: Day Creek Community Facilities District Consultant Contracts
Attached for Council execution are the final contracts with Milldan Associates
and Brown 6 Nazarek to perform the required consulting services in connection
with formation of the Day Creek Community Facilities District.
These services were approved at your December 7, 1983 Council meeting not to
exceed $24,500.00. These agreements represent the legal documents to complete
that previous action.
Funds to cover the cost of these services will be drawn from the Day Creek
Redevelopment Fund per provision of a previous agreement.
RECOWNDATION
It is recommended that execution of contracts with Hilldan Associates,
Assessment Engineers and Brown 6 Nazarek, Bond Counsel to complete the
procedures leading to election on the formation of a Community Facilities
District to construct Day Creek. Total amount of contracts not to exceed
$24,500.00 to be funded by Day Creek Redevelopment funds.
Respectfully submit ed,
Attachments
1l rJo-0 $j
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT •
for
Day - Etiwanda Drainage Systems
City of Rancho Cucamonga
The intent of this report is to briefly summarize how a Mello Roos
Community Facilities District (Section 533311 et seq of the Government
Code of the State of California) might be formed within the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of financing the Day - Etiwanda
drainage improvements.
Mello Roos provides for the establishment of a special tax which may be
levied on the area within the prc.p, sed district for the purpose of
supporting the issuance of bonds, or to otherwise pay the project costs
as they are incurred.
•
Adoption of a Resolution of Intention is required in the formation pro-
ceedings. The resolution shall set forth the particulars of the district
which will include, but not be limited to, the public facilities to be
financed by the district, a statement as to the rate and method of
apportionment of the special tax, and sufficient detail to allow each
owner to estimate his annual maximum tax.
The sequence of events leading to district confirmation will be as set in
the Mello Roos Codc Section 533311, The approval of the proposed
special tax will be by 2/3 voter consent. In that there are fewer than
12 registered voters residing within the proposed district, the vote will
be by land owners.
Once voter approved, the tax rate cannot be increased without another
election,
I ,
0
• Boundaries
n
The boundaries of this proposed Community Facilities District consists
(with slight modifications) of that portion of the Day Creek drainage
area lying within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as that boundary is shown on the reports prepared by Bill Mann and
Associates and are commonly referred to as the Bill Mann report. The
proposed boundary is more particularly shown on the attached sketch.
(See Figure 1)
The boundaries of the Community Facilities District terminate at the
corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga since at this point in
time, there are no provisions in the Mello Roos Act permitting its
extension across lines of political jurisdiction. Also excluded within the
above drainage area are the completed and occupied residential subdivi-
sions since these developments have completed their drainage require-
ments as a condition of developing and will not receive significant addi-
tional benefit from the works proposed.
In establishing these boundaries, it is recognized that the Day Creek
drainage area boundary extends both north and south of the corporate
limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the south lies the City of
Ontario which concurrently is attempting to develop a financing program
for that portion of Day Creek which is located within that City. To the
north lies the County of San Bernardino where certain portions of the
Day Creek system must be constructed in order for the proposed facil-
ities within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to function
properly.
The entire area drains in a southerly direction with very few topo-
graphic features separating the drainage systems in an east -west
direction. As development occurs, the east -west boundaries of these
drainage courses could be altered by the development grading.
2 .'r
It would be proposed that should properties lying outside these bound- •
aries ultimately elect to discharge their drainage into these boundaries,
and are permitted to do so, they pay a fee equal to the total of both
the principal and interest of the bonding obligations such properties
would have supported, had they been originally incorporated within this
district, Such funds, if collected, would be credited to the Debt
Redemption Fund utilized to finance the Day Creek system.
Irterrelation of Jurisdictions
Facilities proposed are all that portion of the Day Creek channel lying
within the corporate boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Also
proposed to be funded by this district are those facilities lying within
the unincorporated portion of San Bernardino County consisting of the
proposed debris dam and the improvement of that portion of Day Creek
from the proposed debris dam to the City limits of Rancho Cucamonga. .
The Day Creek system is a regional flood control system affecting and
benefitting several jurisdictions. Its improvement is required to contain
and retard the increased run -off resulting from development of the
area. As such, its physical function can only be accomplished by the
construction of these facilities in several political jurisdictions and
cannot effectively be constructed in one area without also being
constructed in another area.
Construction of this system through the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
together with the debris dam and channel improvements in the unincor-
porated portion of San Bernardino County upstream from the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, will not in itself produce an operating system
capable of functioning in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Also neces-
sary to such a system is the construction of Day Creek through the
•
3
City of Ontario and the construction of retarding basins such that these
flows with their increased quantities resulting from further development
will, when they reach the County of Riverside, produce a situation
acceptable to that jurisdiction as the result of ouch increased flows.
Retarding basins are proposed both in the City of Ontario and in the
County of Riverside, both of which are necessitated in part by the
additional flows caused by development within the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga.
Over the past three years, studies were initiated under an agreement
involving the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the
cities of Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, and Fontana. The Riverside
County Flood Control District assisted in coordinating the development
of the hydrology criteria and developed that portion of the Drainage
Plan for San Sevaine Creek in Riverside County. The drainage plan
• for the Day Creek system ties to and was coordinated with the River-
side County Flood Control District's drainage plan for Day Creek at
Riverside Drive below the Pomona Freeway. Private developer interests
in San Bernardino County also had a major role in the development of
the drainage plan and participated in boih the Technical and Steering
Committees.
The technical committee of this group has reviewed the joint respon-
sibilities of the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario and, after
considerable study and discussion, has concluded that the relative
responsibility of the two cities for the Day Creek system lying within
the cities of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga, together with the upstream
portion in San Bernardino County, the downstream retarding basin in
Riverside County, and a portion of Etiwanda Channel in Ontario should
be distributed equitably from a cost standpoint between the two cities
;n the relationship of 399 to the City of Ontario and 619 to the City of
4 ;.
MELLO ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
M
ww�w�
PROPOSED SYSTEM
0
•
•
0
•
Rancho Cucamonga. The portion of the work lying within the unincor-
porated portion of San Bernardino County is assumed by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga by reason of certain redevelopment obligations. The
report setting forth the equity of this distribution, known as the
Funding Mechanisms for the Day, Etiwanda, and San Sevaine Creek
System Drainage Plan, is incorporated with this report by reference.
For the purpose of setting forth the financial responsibilities of this
Community Facilities District within the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
those facilities of common benefit to be built by the City of Ontario, the
cost of this obligation is set forth as the amount of $3,440,820. By
contributing this amount to the proposed Day Creek system and
retarding basin southerly of the corporate boundaries of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, this Community Facilities District will have
contributed its fair share to the plan.
Facilities Proposed
In view of the above, it is proposed that the facilities to be constructed
by the Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District include the
debris dam in the unincorporated area north of the City, the improve-
ment of Day Creek in the unincorporated territory between the debris
dam and the northerly city limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the
construction of Day Creek through the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
the payment to the contracting authority in Ontario for the aforemen-
tioned obligation in return for that City completing Day Creek through
its boundaries together with constructing both the Wineville and
Riverside basins to a capacity as such capacities are set forth in the
Bill Mann Report.
5 "
Secondary System
The City of Rancho Cucamonga imposes a drainage development fee upon
ail properties within the City. This fee is currently established at
$4,050 per acre and is collected at the Building Permit level. Within
the boundaries of this proposed Community Facilities District, there
are, in effect, two categories of deficiencies. The Day Creek improve-
ments, which are the purpose of this district, may be categorized as
the primary or regional portion of the drainage system, having an esti-
mated current cost of $17,056,820 for that portion of this regional
system to be financed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Additionally,
there is a secondary drainage system deficiency consisting of those
laterals that will drain into the Day Creek system. The total amount of
that deficiency is approximately equal to that of the primary system. It
is proposed that the City's current ordinances pertaining to this drain-
age fee not be altered or modified as a result of this proposed Commu-
nity Facilities district, Monies collected by the drainage fee will continue
•
to be used for the secondary system and that system is not funded by
this Community Facilities District.
Types of Properties
The major portion of this area consists of undeveloped properties in
need of these facilities to facilitate their development. These undevel-
oped properties are likely to develop, either residential or industrial,
both of which will require or benefit from the facilities proposed.
Within these proposed boundaries, a significant area is occupied by
either developed industrial plants or utii, ties. These properties will be
equally served by the facilities proposed and no distinction is made
between such properties and the undeveloped properties in setting forth
•
6
• the special tax rate. Publicly owned properties are excluded which
consist principally of freeway and flood control rights -of -way. Where
areas are expressed, they are expressed in gross acreage, consequently,
existing public streets are included in the calculation of areas of adjoin-
ing properties.
For the purpose of the area calculations, only public owned fee prop-
erties, flood control properties and freeway rights - of-way are excluded.
Redevelopment Contribution
The project area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency encompasses most of the properties within this proposed Commu-
nity Service District. In the formation of that Redevelopment Agency,
the Agency, through the fiscal review process, agreed to contribute
• approximately one -third of the total tax increment generated toward the
Day Creek drainage improvements.
CJ
So as not to ask the voters to authorize a tax rate which is consider-
ably higher than may ue needed in the future, it is proposed in this
report that the Redevelopment Agency commit a minimum of $500,000 per
year to this program. This exceeds its current obligation under the
one -third commitment. The $500,000 annual payment thus committed will
finance $3,225,000 of hard costs, thus reducing the amount to be raised
by Mello Roos to $13,031,820. (As used herein, "hard costs" means the
cost of engineering, construction and right -of -way acquisition and does
not include bond discount, reserve fund, cost of proceedings, etc.)
If, in future, years, one third of the annual tax increment exceeds
$500,000, that amount will be utilized to reduce the special tax.
7
Special Tax'
It is proposed that the special tax be levied on a gross acreage basis.
The total taxable area is approximately 3969 acres.
It is proposed that the tax rate be uniformly applied. The cost esti-
mate (see page 13) indicates a hard cost of $13,831,820 for the
facilities. To convert this number to a tax rate, we employ a factor of
.155.
This means that in order to fund $1,000 for engineering and con-
struction, it is necessary to have an annual income (or special tax) of
$155. This multiplier takes into account interest rates, reserve fund,
bond discount, and proceeding costs. The actual bonds to be issued to
raise that $1,000 engineering and construction fund would be about
$1,250.
19
To calculate the special tax, the costs of the facilities are first •
apportioned to the taxable properties on a gross acreage basis and then
converted to the tax rate by the above method. It should be noted
that if bonds are to be issued, the amount of the issue will exceed the
hard cost indicated above for the reasons explained.
The special tax shall be computed on a gross acre extending to the
centerline of adjoining streets, but not including freeways and rights -
of -way for the facilities to be constructed by this district. Corner lots
shall have the stre ^t area on the shorter side eliminated from area cal-
culations.
r1
LJ
8 .,
• Aallnt Iccue
In submitting this issue to the voters, it will be necessary to set forth
the maximum tax as well as setting forth the amount of any bonds to be
sold to finance the cost of the facilities. As has previously been
indicated, the hard costs required to be raised by this Community
Facilities District for this project will be $13,831,820 and this can be
supported by a tax rate of $550 per gross acre. Since the foregoing
amount is hard cost and does not include bond discount, reserve fund,
or proceeding costs, the actual issue will be somewhat higher, being
approximately $17 million. As has been indicated, the special tax rate
has been arrived at by a .155 multiplier of the hard costs,
consequently the $550 per gross acre will be sufficient to support a
bond issue including both the hard and procedural costs.
• Other Fund Sources
19
In addition to the redevelopment contributions, there are other sources
of funds that could reduce the necessity of applying the special tax in
other than the first several years. A substantial portion of the cost
of the improvement work will be expended in the unincorporated area.
Such unincorporated areas will not be subjected to this special tax.
There are, however, properties within these areas that may be served
by the facilities proposed, The City, concurrent with initiating the
Mello Roos district, will formally request the San Bernardino County
Board of Supervisors to impose development fees on this unincorporated
area with such fees being contributed to the financing of the facilities
proposed.
Efforts are in process to finance a portion of the entire project by a
Federal interest-free loan. Should these efforts be successful, the
special tax could be significantly reduced.
9
� .J
Should properties outside the proposed boundaries elect and be permit- •
ted to drain into the boundaries, a fee would be levied with such
amount; being contributed to the Day Creek fund.
The San Bernardino County Flood Control District could acquire fund
sources that could be available for these facilities.
Apportionment
The special tax is proposed to be levied by gross acres. As land
divisions occur, the special tax shall be apportioned to the new parcels
in proportion to the acreage they occupy.
If the divisions are for the purpose of creating similar units, the tax
rate attributable to the gros^ acr =age will to apply to the acreage of
the division, then divided by the number of units to be created with an •
equal tax applied to each unit irrespective of minor acreage deviations.
If the divisions occur without the creation of a series of lots of similar
size, apportionments will be by acreage with the maximum tax remaining
at f550lacre.
Water Reclamation Facilities
Certain water reclamation projects which also have a relationship :o
drainage were included in the Bill Mann reports, These and their
respective costs are:
Day Creek Spreading Grounds $ 1,100,000
Day Creek Basin f 2,500,000
•
10
• Efforts are now being made to fund these two facilities, together with a
major portion of the Day Creek system included in this report, by an
interest -free Federal loan. If that loan should be obtained, not only
these water reclamation facilities, but a major portion of the Day Creek
system would be funded by the loan.
•
19
The objective of the Community Facilities District proposed herein is to
develop a funding mechanism to repay loans whether they be in the
form of bonds, or interest free loans. This process, therefore, is not
in conflict with these Federal funding efforts. Should these Federal
funding efforts be successful, the project would be expanded to include
the above two water reclamation facilities. Since the funding would be
interest free, the tax rate would actually reduce even though the scope
of the project increased. For that reason, those two projects are con-
ditionally included, dependent upon Federal funding, but no adjustment
to the maximum tax rate is proposed.
fil
Cost Estimate and Area Summary
Day - Etiwanda Creek Improvements
Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga and •
San Bernardino County
Total System Construction 8 Enaineerinci Costs
Debris Basin (in S B County) f 2,375,000.00
Day Creek (in S B County) 6,050,000.00
Day Creek (in Rancho Cucamonga) 5,191,000.00
Day Creek (in Ontario) 5,009,000.00
Wineville Basin (in Ontario) 3,030,000,00
Riverside Basin (in Riverside County) 3,357,000.00
Etiwanda Channel (in Ontario) 2,950,000.00
Total $27,962,000.00
Obligation: (per Bill Mann Report)
Rancho Cucamonga 61%
$17,056,820.00
Ontario 398
$10,905,180.00
Facilities to be built by Rancho Cucamonga
Debris Basin (in S B County)
f 2,375,000.00
Day Creek (in S B County)
6,050,000.00
Day Creek (in Rancho Cucamonga)
5,191,000.00
Rancho Cucamonga (share of work
to be done in Ontario)
3,440,820.00
•
Total
$17,056,820.00
Area (Grass)
District
4597
Public Property (existing) -
378
Non- Taxable Property (future) -
250
x'43 3"4
Tax Rate Calculation
Project Hard Costs
$17,056,820.00
Capitalized $500,000 RDA Funds
$500,0001.155
- 3,225,000.00
Amount to be raised by Special Tax
$13,831,820.00
Cost per Gross Acre
$13,831,820
3-9 l f3, 4851acre
�
Special Tax Rate
X31,820
3§6-§--
3§6-§-- x .155 = $540,17/acre/year
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX $550lACREIYEAR
(All acres gross) •
• AGREEMENT
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
in 1983, by and between the City of RaTo Cucamonga,
erea ter referred to as CITY, and Willdan Associates, hereinafter
referred to as ENGINEER.
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, CITY has a need for financial and engineering consult-
ing services to implement a financing program to be known as Day/
Etiwanda Drainage Improvements; and
WHEREAS, it is beneficial to CITY to have under contract an
engineering firm which can immediately perform required services for
CITY; and
WHEREAS, ENGINEER, in association with F. Mackenzie Brown,
Attorney, have specialized knowledge for constructing and implementing
a Mello Roos Community Facilities Uisirict; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to set forth the
• terms and conditions under which ENGINEER shall provide CITY with
the services as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, ENGINEER desires to perform engineering services for
CITY under contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed as follows:
First: ENGINEER, when authorized, shall perform the following
services as outlined herein for establishment of a "Mello Roos Community
Facilities District" within the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose
of financing drainage improvements.
This phase of services, known as Phase II, shall carry
the Mello Roos proceedings up to and through an election and consists
of the following:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1) Prepare an engineer's report. This report will follow the program
presented in our preliminary report, but will be adapted to the
legal format required by the Act Several additional meetings are
anticipated with property owners.
19
2) Prepare a legal description of the boundaries; that description .
would be similar in format to a legal description used for a rede-
velopment area project boundary.
3) From information contained in the County Assessor's records,
prepare a map suitable for recording which would contain the
following information:
a) The parcelizaton existing as of I March 1983.
b) Any modifications subsequent to 1 March 1983 that appear in
CITY records.
cl The net area of all parcels.
d) The gross area of all parcels as such areas are defined in the
engineer's report.
e) The Assessor's number for each parcel,
f) A parcel identification number for each parcel to aid CITY
reference,
In preparing the above map, it would be set up for the following four
functions:
a) As an insert in the engineer's report.
b) As an easy reference source for obtaining the necessary
acreage information for preparing the special tax.
c) As a map that can be recorded for the purpose of disclosure.
d) As a control to be utilized by CITY to record land divisions
such that each year the special tax can be calculated.
The basis for the mapping will be taken from CITY's existing map which
shows parcelization. The map will be redrawn at an appropriate scale
and updated using current assessment records. The map will their be
photographically reduced to serve as an insert in the engineer's report.
Y) Obtain the names and addresses of all owners to be taxed.
5) Prepare a list of the owners and the area of the property which
they own within the district, and provide this to the entity that
will conduct the special election.
6) In consultation with the attorney employed by CITY to determine
the proper voting of adjoining land parcels under similar ownership
and provide same to entity conducting the election.
•
• 7) Research title on various easement properties such as the trans-
mission rights -of -way held by the Southern ,;alifornla Edison
Company to determine the party that would pay the special tax.
8) Under the direction of the City Engineer, continue to respond to
questions forwarded from either the property owners, their
representatives, or other public agencies interested in this
program,
9) Attend such meetings, including Council meetings and public
hearings, as required.
10) Examine the records of the County Registrar of Voters and file
certification with CITY as to the number of registered voters
residing within the district boundaries.
11) Meet with the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District for,
among other things, setting up a fee ordinance for properties
within their territory, with such fees contributed to the Mello Roos
district.
12) Draft such agreements with property owners or Flood Control
District as may be necessary to formalize understandings reached
during the formation process,
. 13) Prepare a time schedule for approval by CITY.
Second: CITY shall provide ENGINEER with general assistance
by furns15—ing at tic, cost the following:
11 Copies of existing plans, tax assessor maps„ aerial photographs.
and existing drainage studies for the area.
i) Assist ENGINEER in scheduling meetings with interested land-
owners and providing available conference room facilities for gen-
eral meetings.
Third: CITY shall reimburse ENGINEER for services performed
basecf--onthe hourly rates and costs as submitted to CITY, but not to
exceed a total fee of $17,000 (seventeen thousand dollars). Printing,
reproduction and mailing expenses will be invoiced to CITY at cost from
a separate budget estimated to be $1,000 (one thousand dollars). Said
hourly rates are set forth in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
1) The above fees shall include incidental expenses, as well as equip-
ment and instruments, the use of office space and minor materials
and supplies. Work to be done outside the scope of the project
shall not be done without written authorization from CITY. Com-
pensation for this additional work shall be determined by mutual
consent of CITY and ENGINEER.
21 ENGINEER shall bill CITY monthly based on the hourly rates sub- •
mitted to CITY. Billing shall be by employee classifications,
Indicating number of hours worked during the billing period, the
hourly rate and the amount billed. Billing will show the amount
billed to date, amount paid to date, and current balance to be
paid.
3) CITY shall pay ENGINEER the amount due once each month follow-
ing approval at a regular meeting of the City Counci;. ,
I
Fourth: Period of Performance shall be 180 days after receipt
of a Ice to rocee Is issued by the CITY. Such performance
shall conform to a schedule submitted by ENGINEER and approved by
CITY.
Fifth: Time Extensions All time extensions requested by
ENGINEER must a m aUee in -writing to CITY and approved by the City
Engineer. Time delays by CITY will automatically be added to ENGI-
NEEP's time of completion for the work. The time during which ENGI-
NEER is delayed in his work by acts of neglect of CITY, or its employ-
ees, or those under it, by contract or otherwise, or by an Act of God,
which ENGINEER could not have foreseen and provided for, and which
is not due to any fault or negligence on the part of ENGINEER, shall •
be added to the time of completion of the work. Determination of
delays shall be made by mutual agreement between CITY and ENGINEER.
Sixth: Termination The right is reserved by CITY to termi-
nate tFs Agreement at any time upon written notice to ENGINEER in
the event the pfo;ect or any portion thereof is to be abandonea or
indefinitely postponed, or in case ENGINEER's services, in the judgment
of CITY, are unsatisfactory, or because of ENGINEER's failure to
prosecute the work with diligence or within the time limits specified or
because of his inability to perform. In any such case, ENGINEER shall
be paid the value of the services rendered up to the time of termination
provided, however, that in no event shall ENGINEER receive a fee in
excess of maximum fee stated in paragraph three above.
Seventh: Designated Representative William C. Stookey, RCE
8719, Is aeslgnated as t e egistere Civil Engineer who will represent
ENGINEER and be its primary contact and agent in all consultations
with CITY during the fulfillment of the terms of this Agreement.
Eighth: Access to Work Product City Engineer or his des -
ignat�presentative shall, at all--times, have access to the work
product of ENGINEER for this project whenever it is in preparation and •
progress.
• Ninth: Compliance with Law ENGINEER understands, and
does We by agree, that in theperformance of services pursuant to this
Agreement, that he shall comply with all applicable laws and govern-
mental regulations pertaining to such services when performed for
CITY.
Tenth: Amendment This Agreement shall not be modified
Air—
except y Agreement in writing signed by both parties.
Eleventh: Assi nmment This Agreement shall not be assigned,
in whore or in part—. 16—y—E _ NEER.
Twelfth: Notices Whenever notices are required to be given
pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, the same shall be given
by depositing the same In the United States Mail, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows:
1 ) Lloyd Hubbs
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9161 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
is 2) William C. Stookev
Wilidan Associates
290 South Anaheim Boulevardl100
Anaheim. California 92805
Notice shall be deemed to have been given, for the purpose of this
Agreement, on the day that the same is deposited in the United States
Mail.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agree-
ment to be executed on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By.
ATTEST:
By:
Zity Clerk WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:
i iam loo ey
Executive Vice President
Is By:
City Attorney
SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT •
THIS AGREEMENT is Made and entered into this day of , 1983,
by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- TISIFDRMIA, as pC LET c corpontlon
(hereinafter referred to As -City-1, and BROWN G MAZAREN, Attorneys at La.,
(hereinafter referred to as 'Counsel'),
NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows;
SECTION 1. That Counsel shall perforW legal services in connection with the proposed
proceedings relating to the formation of a Community ratihnes District,
including any related band issuance, in the natter of a m000sed Conn,.
nily Facilities District known add designated as
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTR;CT ND. I
(hereinafter referred to as the 'District') under proceedings conducted
pursuant to the Provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Oct of
1982', being Chapter 2.5, part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government
Code of the State of California.
Said services shall Include:
A. preparation of all resolutions, notices, contracts, bond forms, and
other papers and documents required in the proceedings;
8. Examination of the proceedings, step by step, as taken;
C. Appear at all hearings under the Proceedings, and attend any noi,
,here attendance is required;
D. Review the 'Report' of the Engineer As it relates to the proceedings
for the District;
E. Review and exanihe the MP snowing the area aM bourdaries of the
District;
F. Review the Method and formula utilized by the Enainee• for the
apportiomnent of the special tom;
G. Make recomenendations as to sale of bonds, as rea0ree;
H. Assist In any election procedure processing, as nttessary an. "pr
required;
I. Instruction and advice In connection With any of lie foreoeirc;
J, Issuance of an approving legal opinion attesting to the velid,iv of
the proceedings and the issuance of the bonds;
M. Any And all other customary Proceedings relating to the formation of
the District and the issuance of bonds.
Such legal services shall not include any services in connection .,V the
atguistsion, by easement or condeenation, of any easements or other
interest in real property necessary for the Proposed impr ...anent s. These
services Can be Provided by Counsel, by separate agreement. if desired.
C
• SECTION 2. That the City shall perform a follows:
A. Furnish to Counsel such rps, records, title searches, and other
docsomentS And Proceedings, or certified copies thereof, as necessary.
I. Pay to Course! a fee coputed on the final $mount of the bond issue
as follows:
ONE -HALF OF ONE PERCENT (1 /21) on the first 110,000,000;
011E - QUARTER OF ONE PERCENT (IRS) from $10,000,001 to S20,00C,O%,
ONE -EIGHTH PERCENT (1 //[) on the balance.
SECTION 3. The fees specified in Section 2 above do not include any services in
connection with the acquisition, by contract or condemnation, of a ^y
easenents or other Property necessary for the District, or any servlce5
in connection with any Proceedings for validation of any proceedings o•
in connection with any other litigation,
At the reduelt of the City, Counsel will represent it in any Plot -
matters relating to said project. Including, but not limited te, the
following:
A. Enviroeental proceedings;
I. Acquisition Of Property by negotiation or condemnation;
C. Lit illation challenging the validity of the Proceedings;
D. validation of Proceedings,
Counsel Will perform any of ine above services at an hourly rate to be
mutually agreed upon before any work is actually performed, and Counsel
does agree that an agreement would be provided for any services desired.
SECTION a. in the event the Proceedings are terminated or Abardoned Prior to the
sale of bonds either upon conclusion of the public hearing or upon the
conclusion of the election, Counsel shall be paid a reasonable fee for
services rendered to date based upon a hourly rate of $gC.X Per hove,
not to exceed 57,500.00.
SECTION S. Counsel hereby states that it does rot represent clients with adverse
interests to the City as it relates to the issuance and sale of the bonds
for financing this District,
SECTION 6. That this Agreement may be terminated by either party hereto by mal•in-
written notice thereof to the Other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be emecute: or
the day and year first bereinabove written,
•Etrr^
RANCHO CUCMONGair A
By:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA
ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
F
co 4srr
MOWN $ N AT
Iy:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA`�IA+o
• MEMORANDUM��.^
F
_ Z
DATE: December 21, 1983 _
W7
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -04B
AND ZONE CHANGE 83-04 - SKAMORE INVE TMENT - An
amendment to the General Plan Lan Use ap to c ange the
northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line from an Office
designation to a Neighborhood Commercial designation and
to change the zone from AP (Administrative Professional)
to NC (Neighborhood Commercial) - APN 202 - 181 -27.
BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of December 7, 1983, the
ounc�i7reviewed an appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission to
• deny the above - described General Plan amendment and zone change. The
City Council conducted a public hearing and received all public input,
staff reports, and Planning Commission recommendation. Upon completion
of that hearing, the City Council voted to reverse the decision of the
Commission and to approve the General Plan amendment as well as the
subsequent zone change.
i
The City Council directed staff to prepare the necessary documents for
the Council's final review and adoption. Attached please find a
resolution which requires adoption by the City Council for final
approval of General Plan Amendment 83 -04B. In addition, an ordinance
has been provided for the implementation of Zone Change 83 -04. The
resolution requires a motion and adoption by the majority of the
Council, while the ordinance requires first reading at tonight's meeting
and a second reading at a subsequent Council meeting.
R spectfu 1y submitted,
i mez
City Planner
RG:MV:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Resolution - GPA 83 -04B
Ordinance - ZC 83 -04
I T
ct3)
C-ln----)
I
I I
0 0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 12,21-14_6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE LAND USE POLICY OF THE _
ADOPTED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL �..,
PLAN PERTAINING TO NEIGHBORHOOD�r -:
FA"l.li -F�
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing
to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City
Council has hereby approved the following amendment to the Land Use Element of
the General Plan.
SECTION 1: The Land Use Policy contained in Chapter III of the Land
Use Element pertaining to Neighborhood /Commercial shall be modified from:
"No more than 2 centers shall be developed at each
designated intersection"
To:
"No more than 2 centers shall be developed at any
• intersection except where intersection contains 3 uch
centers built and completed prior to April 6, 1981"
SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for these
General P an amen ments based upon the completion and findings of the Initial
Study.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mike s, Mayor
ATTEST:
10 Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
kep
I I'
RESOLUTION NO. 12- 21 -04CR
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing
to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City
Council does hereby approve the following amendments to the land use element
of the General Plan.
SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment No. 83 -048: The Land Use Map
shall be amen ed as follows:
The northeast corner of Base Line and Archibald which is
currently designated as "office use" shall be changed to
a neighborhood commercial designation.
SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for these
General P an amen ments, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial
Study.
• PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
kep
Jon D, Mikels, Mayor
//
ORDINANCE NO. 12 721 OICO�
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 181 -27 FROM A -P
(ADMINISTRATIVE/PROFESSIONAL) TO NC (NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL) FOR 5.44 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND ARCHIBALD
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A, This City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
. herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly.
Assessor parcel number 202- 181 -27, which is generally
located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Base
Line, and which consists of approximately 5 acres of
land, is hereby amended to the NC District (Neighborhood
Commercial).
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause tiFe same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least in The Dail , A Re 2rt, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontarl oli ornia, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this , day of 19_.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IF
Jon D. Mike s, Mayor
i Ilr�-
:7
J
0
IYIV no n A Arrvn rr TPA aanWrA
STAFF REPORT?p ,
1Z
DATE: December 21, 1983 19 -7
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Orde; to vacate the East /West Alley between 8th Street and Acacia
Street, west of Cottage Avenue
Mr. Mayhew, owner of the property located at the northwest corner of Acacia
Street and Cottage Avenue, has requested that the above described 20 foot
alley be vacated in order to provide additional property for his project,
Parcel Map 8179, Parcel Map 8179 was tentatively approved on October 12, 1983
by the Planning Commission. The tentative approval included a recommendation
to vacate the east /west alley north of Tentative Parcel Map 8179.
The alley is unpaved and does not provide access to any properties. The
existing dwellings to the north have access from Cottage Avenue and 8th
Street.
Area property owners have been sent notices of the public hearing and the
alley has been posted. Also, public notices have been advertised in The Uaily
Report.
RECQMENUATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt tho dtt TrhpA recnlut. ion authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and directing the City Clerk to record
same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
Respectfully sub tted,
LBH :j as
Attachments
• RESOLUTION N0. 12- 2i =Jf5CR
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING TO BE VACATED, THE EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED
BETWEEN 8TH STREET AND ACACIA STREET, WEST OF COTTAGE
AVENUE
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 83 -191 passed on November 16, 1983, the
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a
portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the
hour of 7:30 p.m. on December 21, 1983. in the Lions Park Community Center
Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time
and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place,
and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that
the eastrwest a ey located between 8th Street and Acacia Street, west of
• Cottage Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospective public street
purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of
said City street as shown on Map No.V -029 on file in the office of the Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal
description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference
made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations
and excep font s, 7 any, set forth in Exhibit "B ", which is attached hereto and
by reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution
to be recor— ed n the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County,
California.
SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this reso utiT —'on and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
It
Jon 0. Mike s, Mayor
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of the 20 foot East /West alley lying Easterly of the Northerly
prolongation of the Westerly property line of Lot 18 of the Lucas Suhdivison
as recorded in Map Book 19, Page 8, Records of San Bernardino County, State of
California.
L
•
•
O
EXHIBIT "B"
Reserving and excepting unto, Cucamonga County Water District and General
Telephone Company all the areas described in Exhibit "A" as easement for
public utility purposes.
•
_Il`_� x }f \ LuXIMMJn DI
U X y{ AL `f � 5%NI
i1 �os•
rf&U rl VE
PARCEL MAP NO. B/79
`T
T
IN W C/rY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA
A[✓[LgLI
JFOx:,r <rNW3f0 ?NJ/q Cl:OID OJq /4 M,R:0 W0
K 1[YI //! 0I rMFIYXXF^G
nrw err rawer, �. /}l
�. rTX
,1((f r q rMf K} r ( /HF y
L/O tOT , 4(WIGCXIS'INlf K1}SWO,Y /LWr
x
PARCEL
}KX
nrarrv` rs4u Yrr K� [l'rlr0 rX figr r), ,`Ly IO`YIn}. X([qo} O( SN
m eLVN. <MNIr Jr�T Pr(4/2MN.v
n
IOYxYYr Wr1 /t rflrK'4 fWw'MAr. pl NI
NrfX W }L<[1xT TL fxq)
L11YM C• //(YT IVW,YYrr /y {Xr:[t tl /tf
wr
SreEEr
fw t
Nww.� rsXr.
Mru ur n rn.w pr
STALE I•: �� i ;]
\"
E[ISrIN6 AESIOEV"t
y S
p
l
R,
�W xOWELCIN
Ir /t M^wrrwr W/i
N
1
W
_Il`_� x }f \ LuXIMMJn DI
U X y{ AL `f � 5%NI
i1 �os•
`T
T
EXIST RESERVOIR VACANr
�
nrw err rawer, �. /}l
�
III
'I
x
PARCEL
Urlllrf CtarNNK}
n
NrfX W }L<[1xT TL fxq)
�
STALE I•: �� i ;]
\"
R,
W
2 N
m
PARCF 2
Iror runwr marl
i
_
�
=
_Il`_� x }f \ LuXIMMJn DI
U X y{ AL `f � 5%NI
i1 �os•
EEr I(Y/
fww" I .
swA
•4 Nr.Im W..wn
LA!
Nh
kQ
W=
f
i
3
s
w =
•
Lcs[xo
.i. wrm «.^ .o.o�� •
Nbrr r
eT MWVO � }pgxY }wq
EXIST RESERVOIR VACANr
nrw err rawer, �. /}l
Urlllrf CtarNNK}
n
NrfX W }L<[1xT TL fxq)
EEr I(Y/
fww" I .
swA
•4 Nr.Im W..wn
LA!
Nh
kQ
W=
f
i
3
s
w =
•
Lcs[xo
.i. wrm «.^ .o.o�� •
Nbrr r
eT MWVO � }pgxY }wq
I]
U
2
8th.
V -029
3 2 I
`cs�
Por Lot 4 4 r0
(a i4 r 5 .•rr i \p�1Q
13 6
r' Q r2
w 17" wJJ'
JC
_
LU
ti
'0
•p
�e
17
\
CD
3 2 I
`cs�
Por Lot 4 4 r0
(a i4 r 5 .•rr i \p�1Q
13 6
Ld
a
Q
ti
O
U
r�
ZACACIA - - - STREET
TO BE VACATED ■■■■■■■■
�q title;
%S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w
EXHIBIT "A"
$ ENGINEERING DIVISION
0 �' VICINITY NIAP j N page
r' Q r2
7
(D3/
o
.I
ti
I
i ti
\
CD
\
6
11
e
�T 4
2
U
l
m
O 10 ?
9
7
fe
cqr
9
Ld
a
Q
ti
O
U
r�
ZACACIA - - - STREET
TO BE VACATED ■■■■■■■■
�q title;
%S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w
EXHIBIT "A"
$ ENGINEERING DIVISION
0 �' VICINITY NIAP j N page
.I
ti
I
i ti
6
5
4 1
3
2
1
7
fe
cqr
9
7
w
0
r
C; ,
9
16
U
10
15
�zJ
11
14
0
(A
c%
12
13
cm
its
Ld
a
Q
ti
O
U
r�
ZACACIA - - - STREET
TO BE VACATED ■■■■■■■■
�q title;
%S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w
EXHIBIT "A"
$ ENGINEERING DIVISION
0 �' VICINITY NIAP j N page
0
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Street Name Change
cx^MO,�
19"
The Foothill Fire District has requested that the street names of Pepper
Street and Pepper Court in Tract 12184 and Tract 9423, respectively, be
changed to Culpepper Street and Culpepper Court.
Tract 12184 is located on the east side of Beryl Street and south of Base Line
with Tract 9423 being located directly west of Beryl Street.
As you can see on the attached map, Pepper runs diagonally along the Southern
Pacific Railroad tracks and also east -west on the south side of Base Line. To
have Pepper Court and Pepper Street also running off Beryl Street is
confusing.
Tract 12184 is being built at this time and Tract 9423 is a custom lot tracts
with no houses existing. Therefore, very little inconvenience would be caused
by such a change.
The owners have been sent notices and signs have been posted at the site
giving the time and date of this public hearing.
REC"ENDATIDN
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the
street name change and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same
resolution and cause said resolution to be recorded.
Respectfully upfitted,
[B K:jaa
Attachments
l
RESOLUTION N0. 12- Z1,66CR
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME OF PEPPER COURT
AND PEPPER STREET TO CULPEPPER COURT AND CULPEPPER STREET
WITHIN TRACT 9423 AND TRACT 12184
WHEREAS, it has been found that a certain street name has been used,
which conflicts with street names that are not in the same alignment; and
WHEREAS, emergency services personnel need to be able to determine
street locations without hesitation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, does hereby designate Pepper Court within Tract 9423, as
recorded in Book Pages to be henceforth known as Culpepper
Court and Pepper 3—tr—ee-F within ract 4, as recorded in Book 116, Pages 79
through 82 to be henceforth known as Culpepper Street.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor shall sign said resolution and
the City Clerk attest to same and direct the City Clerk to record same in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino, California.
• PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1963.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
jaa
VI
—Ton 0. Mike s, Mayor
4 -�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
•
rq•.Jon D. Mihd.
T
9� Ch.dn J. auyuet 11 J.... C. F ... t
- DD19 -� Richard M. Dahl Phillip D. Sehl..w
September 6, 1983
Lloyd B. Almand, Battalion Chief
Foothill Fire Protection District
P. 0. Box 35
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
RE: Pepper Street (Tract No. 12184)
Dear Chief Almand,
Thank you for your inquiry into the apparent misnaming of Pepper Street on
Tract No. 12184. Staff has reviewed the street continuity of Pepper Street and
we are perplexed as you. We can find no logical reasoning for Pepper Street
e having an east - west flow (east of Amethyst) then northeast - southwest, west
of Amethyst (following the spur line tracks).
If logic were to prevail, the northeast - southwest portion should be changed
and Tract No. 12184 remain as is. However, we concur that Pepper Street of
Tract No. 12184 should be changedand we further postulate that Pepper Court should
be changed.
Both Pepper Street of Tract No. 12184 and Pepper Court of Tract 9423 will be
changed to Culpepper Street and Culpepper Court respectively.
If there is dny problem with this, please contact us immediately.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGiNEERiNG DIVISION
46�
PAUL A. ROUGEAU y
Senior Civil Engineer
PAR:jaa
10 cc: Richard Jaxon
L+
SEC 807
FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
P. 0. Box 35
6623 Amethyst Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701
(7, 14) 987 -2535
Paul Rougeau R F `o E VV r' r
Senior Civil Engineer
Rancho Cucamonga City Nall `
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 L,lf .°; c,
E",
Dear Mr. Rougeau:
Your tract map no. 12184 has brought to our
attention a perplexing situation in street
naming.
Sheet 3 of this map shows a "Pepper Street"
approximately 64 feet north of an existing
"Pepper Court ". Our present map book shows
"Pepper Street" already existing, running
northeast- southwest parallel to the railroad •
tracks, from Church St. to Lion, and again
from Kirkwood Ave. to Layton Ave. The new
Pepper Street does not fit into the existing
Pepper Street at all, since the new street
runs east -west, and the house numbers overlap
with the northeast - southwest numbers.
There is still time, is there not, to alter
the new Pepper Street's name to Pepperwood
Ave., Culpepper Court, Pepper Tree Lane, or
any other choice?
Our Dispatch Center advises us that the computer
will not accept the new Pepper Street as you
have it on map no. 12184. Therefore we have
serious trouble!
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
We shall await whatever alterations you are
able to make.
Yours truly,
Lloyd B. Almand •
Battalion Chief
ntm
cc: Michael Vairin i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA
a ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP
isn
ntitle;
N r�e�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
S5
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
PUBLIC NOTICE
I, Lloyd Hubbs, being duly sworn, deposes and says, that he is
the duly appointed, qualified Superintendent of Streets for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that pursuant to Resolution No, 83-
195 the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of
California, he on the 6th day of December, 1983, posted the •
PUBLIC NOTICE of the City Council's intent of consideration of
street name change for Pepper Court and Pepper Street to
Culpepper Court and Culpepper Street Notice is attached hereto
and made a part hereof; that Notices were posted not more than
three hundred (300) feet apart in a consipicuous place along each
parcel of property affected by this street name change,
DATE: /i —1 q- g,
4)e�r nten ent of treets
of the Ci%* of Rancho Cucamonga
-7
•
ORDINANCE NO. 21A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTION 5.04.150 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND
REGULATIONS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain
as follows:
Section 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Munnipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
"Chapter 1. General Provisions
"Sec. 5.04.150 License Taxes - Penalties for Delinquents. For
failure to pay a License Tax when due, the collector shall add a
penalty of fifty percent (50%) of such license tax on the first day
of February of each calendar year after the due date thereof.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after Its passage at least once
in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
11
California. •
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this • day of •, 19•.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
0
T
s(
ORDINANCE NO.
AN-ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, •
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.44.110 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SUB-
SECTION (E) THERETO TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF
FOOD OR BEVERAGES FROM VEHICLES OR PUSHCARTS
NEAR PUBLIC SCHOOL GROUNDS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 10.44.110 of the Rancho Cucamonga Munici-
pal Code is hereby amended by adding subsection E to read as
follows:
"E. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
section to the contrary, no person shall park, stop
or stand any vehicle or pushcart upon any part of any
street of the City for the purposes of selling any
food or beverage from such vehicle or pushcart within
1,000 feet of and from the exterior boundary of pro-
perty used or occupied by any public school within the
City between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
inclusive, on days when school is in session. This
subsection shah ::ot apply to delivery of food or bev- •
erages solely to householders or business establish-
ments."
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper
of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California,
and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK •
ORDINANCE NO. ,I)'+
i •AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCiJ!ONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.20.120 OF THE
RANCHO CUCA.MONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATP:E TO
SALES AND USE Tai EXCLUSIONS AND EXEMPTIONS
TO TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 3.20.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"3.20.120. Exclusions and exemptions
"A. The amount subject to tax shall not
include any sales or use tax imposed by the
State of California upon a retailer or consum-
er.
"3. The storage, use, or other consump-
tion of tangible personal property, the gross
receipts from the sale of which have been sub -
J�,ct to tax under a sales and use tax ordin- •
ance enacted in accordance with Part 1.5 of
Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code by
any city and count.:, county, or city, in this
state shall be exempt from the tax due under
this Ordinance.
"C. There are exempted from the compu-
tation of the amount of the sales taxi the
:ss receipts from the sale of tangible per -
scnal property to operators of aircraft to be
used or consumed principally outside the city
in which the sale is made and directly and
exclusively in the use of such aircraft as
common carriers of persons or property under
the authority of the laws of this state, the
Unites States, or any foreign government.
'b. In addition to the exemp_ions pro-
vided in Sections 6366 and 6;66.1 of the Reve-
nue and Taxation Cc6e the storage, use, or
other consumption of tangible personal proper-
ty purchased by operators of aircraft and used
or consumed by such operators directly and ex-
clusively in the use of such aircraft as com-
mon carriers of persons or property for hire •
or compensation under a ccrtificarc of public
convenience and necessity Issued pursuant to
the laws of this state, the United States, or
• any. foreign government is exe -pted from the
use tax.
"E. On the operative date of air, act of
the legislature of the State of California
which amends Section 7202 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code or which repeals and reenacts
Section 7202 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
to provide an exemption from city sa Ls and
use• taxes for operators of waterborne vessels
_n the same, or substantially the same, Lan-
guage as that existing in subdivisions (i)(7)
and (i)(8) of Section 7202 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code as those subdivisions read on
October 1, 1983, the following provisions
shall be operative:
There are exempted from the
computationf of the amount of the sales tax
the gross receipts from the sale of tangible
personal property to operators of waterborne
vessels to be used or consumed principally
outside the city in which the sale is made
and directly and exclusively in the carriage
of persons or property in such vessels for
commercial purposes.
• "2. The storage, use, or other
consumption of tangible personal property
purchased by operators of waterborne vessels
and used or consumed by such operators di-
rectly and exclusively in the carriage of per-
sons or property of such vessels for commer-
cial purposes is exempted from the use tax.
SECTION 2: This Ordinance relates to taxes for the usual and
current expenses of t ^u City and shall take effect immediately.
SECTION 3: The Mayer shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) dais after its passage,
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspap%r of general circula-
tion published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
is
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
MAYOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUC "YONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 82 -2
�ri&IAI
a
E
19"
As originally scheduled, the December 21, 1983 meeting was to begin the formal
hearing process for Alta Loma Channel. Delays in design and environmental
processes have postponed that action to the second meeting in January.
In order to allow property owners maximum opportunity to become fully informed
on the process, we have scheduled the item for presentation as an unadvertised
public hearing.
To facilitate this input, the Council is presented the Resolution of Intention
for adoption. This resolution orders the Engineer to prepare the necessary
documents to complete the contemplated District and construction. The current
schedule contemplates presentation of the Engineer's Report at the January 18
meeting with the final formation hearing to be held March 7, 1984.
COUNTY AGREEMENT
In addition to the Resolution of Intention, the administration agreement with
the County Flood Control District is submitted for your approval, This
agreement stipulates the services and fund transfer arrangements with Flood
Control to allow them to administer the construction contract.
Under the provisions of the agreement, the County would receive the
construction funds upon bond sale and would administer that fund throughout
the construction contract.
The District will inspect all work, perform materials testing and construction
staking. The District will also make all progress payments to the contractor.
At completion and acceptance of the project, surplus funds will be returned to
the City for our disposition. Maintenance of the facility will be the
responsibility of the District.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 82 -2
December 21, 1983
Page 2
n
U
RECOMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council adopt the Resolution of Intention for
Assessment District 82 -2 (Alta Loma Channel Flood Control Channel) and approve
and authorize the execution of the contract management agreement with the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District.
Respectfully submifyted,
LBH:jaa
Attachments
•
9
EEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 1983, by a�
between the CITY [OUNL IL of the CTTY�RANCHO CQCAROpGA- @1TF0WA (hereinafter
called "CITY ", and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
CALIFORNIA, acting as the Board of Supervisors of the San Bernardino County Flood
ont rot District (hereinafter called "DISTRICT ").
WHEREAS. at this time CITY is considering the initiation of proceedings pursuant to
the P ov isions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the
Street and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of
certain'yyyublic improvements, together with apPurtenances and appurtenant work, to
serve anq benefit an area known as designated as
\\ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -2
(ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT)
hereinafter re rred to as the "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ": and,
WHEREAS, the imp vements, upon their construction, will be owned, managed and con-
trolled by the DIS ICE rather than CITY; and,
WHEREAS, Pursuant to a provisions of Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of Cali rnia, CITY and DISTRICT are desirous of setting forth the
terms, conditions and r ponsibilities relating to the works of improvement as pro-
posed for the above -refer ced ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; and,
WHEREAS, it is mutually agr d between the parties that the DISTRICT will authorize
all bidding and make the and of the appropriate construction contract and
responsible for all contract inistration and inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT 15 AGREED AS )FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are\\�alt true and correct.
SECTION 2. That the CITY will conWurt proceedings and levy assessments pursuant to
the provisions of the M icipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", beino Division
12 of the Streets and Hig ays [ode of the State of California, and sell
bonds pursuant to the pro. eicns Of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ",
being Division 10 of said C60e, for the construction of the above refe-
renced improvements, which, uppn their completion, will be owned, manaoed
and controlled by DISTRICT, exXePt that it is aoreed that the improve-
ments on Wilson Avenue, Hillsid Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and the 33"
RCP, 582' long, on Wilson Avenue as well as all the utilities to be
relocated as part of the plans, re rdless of the location, will not be
owned or maintained by the DISTRICT, and will be the responsibility of
the CITY,
SECTION 3. DISTRICT shalt approve all plans, specific dons and drawings, and super-
vise the construction and installation of t utility improvements.
SECTION 4. That DISTRICT shall call for bids and let a contract for the works of
improvement and CITY shall make payment to D TRICE for the costs and
expenses of the works of Improvement from the p eels in the Improvement
Fund. The "expenses of the works of improv nt" Shall include, but
shall not be limited to, the costs of con ruction, acquisition,
engineering, administration and inspection. I the event that the
Improvement Fund becomes depleted, the CITY shall amain responsible
the DISTRICT for all expenses of the works of improvement. Prtar to t
DISTRICT's award of this construction contract, the CITY shall transi
funds to the DISTRICT to cover the construction and contingency cost, as
well as the estimated costs for construction, engineering, surveying,
administration and inspection. The DISTRICT shall submit to the CITY ENGI-
NEER for his approval all service contract enter and in contract change
,I a. ers prior to execution. Where works are performed by DISTRICT personnel
project budgets shall not be exceeded without prior approval of the CITY
SECTION S. It is mutually agreed between CITY and DISTRICT that upon completion of
the facilities, DISTRICT will own, operate and maintain said facilities
• and will continue to provide necessary service to the property amers
within the boundaries of the Assessment District in accordance with all
valid laws, regulations and ordinances in force, and said facilities
shall continually remain and be the property of said DISTRICT.
SECTION 6. Upon the completion of the works of improvement, all surplus funds
remefnin.r in the improvement Fund shall be returned to CITY and he
disposed of by CITY in the manner and form as authorized by law. No
surplus funds remaining in the Improvement Fund shall be returned to the
CITY until such time as the DISTRICT has determined that all expenses of
the works of improvement have been paid.
SECTION 7. Any award of construction contract by DISTRICT shall not be made until
proper notification has been received from CITY to proceed, and that
there has been a successful formation of the Assessment District to allow
the funding of the Assessment District improvements.
SECTIOX B. -ha'. bac-m. effective Leon the completion of proceedin
and funds being available in order to carry out the construction of the
works of improvement.
SECTION 9. Each party herein agrees to release, hold harmless and indemnify the
other party, its officers and employees, from and against any and all
claims, loss, demands, expense, damage or liability whatsoever for inju-
ries to or death of persons or damage to property in any manner arising
out of anything done or omitted to be done by the other party to this
Agreement under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdic-
tion delegated to the parties under this Agreement.
•
ATTEST.
CLERK CITY
I*
"CITY"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:
"DISTRICT"
SAN BERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By
InM IN nNN Vr Inc WNRU yr
OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING
AS THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE SAN
BERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE •
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING iNTENTiON TO ORDER THE CON-
STRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS
TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES IN A PRO-
. POSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO
THE PROVISIONS OF THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVE-
MENT ACT OF 191311: DECLARING THE WORK TO
BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT;
DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO
PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF: AND
PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
F)LLOWS:
SECTION The Pohl is interest and conven,enre require, and it is intention of
this body, pursuant to the provisions of Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of Ealifbrnia (the "Municipal Improvement Apt
of ;913 ") , to order the construction of certain pubic Improvements,
tooether with appurtenances and appurtenant work, in a special assessment
district known and deslanated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. A2 -2
fALTA LOMA FL000 CONTROL :HANNEL)
'hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment Di5trict "1.
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS •
A, the Construction of certain improvements, tooether with appurtenances
and doourtenant work and acouisltion, if necessary, in certain public
streets and riahtrof -way to the Assessment District, as set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto, incorporated and so referenced. For
farther particulars, reference is hereby made to a map of Said
Assessment District previously idooted.
easeTe o nts shall he shown upon the
plans herein referred tc and t) he fled with these br pceedings.
,,. AI! of said work and improv e,ents a•e 'o be constructed at the places
and to the particular locations, of the f)rms, sizes, dimensions and
materials, and at the lines, wades and elevations as shown and
delineated upon the plans, orofl les and Soecificdt ions to be made
therefor, as hereinafter or"ided.
9. the description of the improvements and the termini of the work
contained In this Resolution are aeneral In rat,re. Al items of
work do not necessarily extend 'or the full lenoth of the descrlpt ion
thereof. The plans and orafi les of the work as contained in the
Engineers "Report" shall be contro!I ino as to the correct and
letailed description thereof.
E. Whenever any public way is herein referred to as runninq between two
public ways, or from or to any public way, the intersections of the
public ways referred to are included to the extent that work Shall be
shown on the plans to be done therein.
F, Notice is hereby given of the fact that in many cases said work and*
improvement will bring the finished work to a grade different from
that formerly existing, and that to said extent, said grades are
hereby changed and said work will be done to said changed grades.
wr
DESCRTPTION OF ASSESSMENT OTSTRT'.T
• SECTION 2. That said improvements and work are of direct benefit to the properties
and land within the Assessment District, and this Crty Council hereby
makes the exoenses of said work and Improvement chargeable upon a
district, Much said Assessment District is hereby declared to be the
Assessment District benefited by said work and improvements and to be
assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, including incidental
exoenses and costs and which is described as follows:
All that certain territory in the District included within the exterior
boundary lines shown on the plat exhibiting the property affected or
benefited by or to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of said work
and improvements in the Assessment District, said man titled and Indenti-
fied as
"PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
ASSESSMENT ^;STRICT NO. R2 -2
(AL'A LOMA FLOOD ON -OOL rw444EEl„
and which said map was heretofore approved and which said map or diagram
Is in file with the trdnscriot of these proceedings, E %CEPTING from the
area shown within and delineated upon said map or plat hereinabove
referred to, the area of all public streets, public avenues, public
!anes, public roads, public drives, public courts, Public alleys, and all
easements and rights -of -way therein contained belonging to the public.
For a! I particulars as to the boundaries of the Assessment District,
reference is hereby made to said boundary map heretofore Previously
Ao Droved, and for a complete description of said Assessment District, the
ca;d olat and or000sed boundary map on file shall govern.
• REPORT IF ENG:NEER
SE` "1% T. ' ^at this or000sed Improve ,rent Is hereby referred to the ASSESSMENT
ENGINEER, who is hereby directed to make and file the report in writing
;>ntalarog tae following:
a. glans and specifications of the proposed Improvements:
An estimate of the cost of the orODosed wnrks of improvement, includ-
ing the cost of the Incliental expenses In connettlon therewith:
A diagram showing the assessment nlstrict above referred to, which
Shall also show the boundaries and dimensions -of the respective
Subdivisions of land within Said Assessment 71Strict, as the Same
existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention,
each of which subdivisions sha!! be Plver, a separate number upon said
Diagram:
P, A proposed assessment of the total anount of the assessable costs and
exoenses of the Proposed Improvement undo the several divisions of
land in proportion to the estimated benefits to he received by such
Subdivisions, respectively, from said Improvement. Said assessment
Shall refer to such subdivisions noon said diagram by the respective
numbers thereof:
E. The description of the works of improvement to be constructed under
these proceedings, and acouisition, where necessary.
When any portion or percentage of the cost and expenses of the improve-
ments is to be paid from sources other than assessments, the amount of
Such portion or percentage shall first be deducted from the total
estimated costs and exoenses of said work and improvements, and said
assessment shall include only the remainder of the estimated costs and
expenses. Said assessment shall refer to said subdivisions by their
r resgxtive numbers as assigned pursuant to Subsection 0, of this Section.
BONDS
SECTION�4. Notice is hereby given that serial `vends to represent the unpaid asses 10
ments, and bear interest at the rate of not to exceed the current legs
maximum rate of 12% per annum, will be issued hereunder in the manner
provided in the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the last install-
ment of which bonds shall mature a maximum of and not to exceed FOURTEEN
(14) YEARS from the second day of July next succeeding ten (10) months
from their date. The provisions of Part 11,1 of said Act, providing an
alternative procedure for the advance payment of assessments and the
calling of bonds shall apply. The principal mount of the bonds maturing
each year shall be other than an amount equal to an even annual Propor-
tion of the aggregate principal of the bonds, and the amount of principal
maturino in each year, plus the amount of interest payable in that year,
will be oenerally an aggregate amount that is equal each year, except for
the first year's adjustment.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, sperifirally Section 10603, the Treasurer is hereby desig-
nated as the officer to collect and receive the assessments during the
cash collection period. Said bonds further shall be serviced and collec-
ted by the Treasurer, or designated Paying Agent.
"MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913"
SECTION S. That except as herein otherwise provided for the issuance of bonds, all
of said improvements shall be made and ordered pursuant to the provisions
of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. .
CARPI IIC FIINnC
SECTION 6. That if any excess shall be realized from the assessment, it shall be
used, in Such amounts as the City Council may determine, in Accordance
with the provisions of law for one or more of the followinq purposes:
A. Transfer to the general fund: provided that the anount of any such
transfer shall not exceed t' "e iesse� of pine 'huviend ",ollars
or five percent (5t) of the total from the ; mprovement Fund:
8. As a credit upon the assessment and any soo1ement al is sessment: or
C. For the maintenance of the improvement.
SPECIAL FUND
SECTION 1. That this City Council hereby establishes a Special fund designated as:
"IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 40. 92.2
(ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL)"
into which funds may be transferred at any time to expedite the making of the
improvement herein authorized, and said funds are a loan and shall be repaid out of
the proceeds of the sale of assessments as authorized by law, •
PRIVATE CONTRACT
SECTION B. Notice is hereby given that the public interest will not be served by
allowing the property owners to take the contract for the construction of
the improvements, and that, as authorized by law, no notice of award of
contract shall be published.
GRADES
• SECTiOte.9, That notice is hereby given that the grade to which the work shall be
done is to be shown on the plans and profiles therefor, which grade may
vary from the existing grades. The work herein contemplated shall be
done to the grades as indicated on the plans and sp- cifications, to
which reference is made for a description of the grade at which the work
Is to be done. Any objections or protests to the proposed grade shall
be made at the public hearing to be conducted under these proceedings,
PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
SECTION 10. For any and all information relating to these proceedings, including
information relating to protest procedure, your attention is directed to
the designated person at the department indicated:
LLOYn 8, MOP_8S, CITY ENGINCCR
fY OF RANCHO CUCAR04GA
P.0, BOX 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
TELEPHONE: (714) 989 -1851
PUBLIC PROPERTY
SECTION 11. All public property in the use and Performance of a public function
shall be omitted from assessment in these proceedings unless expressly
provided and listed herein.
• IMPROVEMENT OWNERSHIP
SECTION 12. That this legislative body further proposes to enter into an Agreement
With the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, said Agreement
setting forth certain terms and conditions relating to the bidding and
award of certain construction contracts, as well as the ownership,
management and control of said improvements. A copy of said Agreement
shall be, upon appr0wai, on file in tho Office of the City Clerk.
PETITION
SECTION 13. That a Petition signed by property owners representing more than 60% in
area of the property subject to assessment for said improvement has been
signed and filed with the legislative body, and said written petition
expressly contains a waiver of any of the proceedings and limitations as
set forth under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and
Majority Protest Act of 1931 ".
WORK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
SECTION 14. It Is hereby further determined to be in the best public Interest and
convenience and more economical to do certain work on private property
to eliminate any disparity In level or site between the improvements and
the private property, The actual cost of such work is to be added to
the assessment on the lot on which the work is done, and no work of this
nature is to be performed until the written consent of the property
owner is first obtained.
CITY OF RANCHO :UC:MONGA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -2 •
(ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL)
EXHIBIT "A"
The proposed works of improvement are generally described as follows:
The construction of Certain drainaqe improvements, tooether with appurtenances,
including, but not limited to, the installation of concrete channel facilities, box
culvert improvements, debris basin excavation, and earthdam construction, inciudinq
all apourtenant street and other work required for said improvements, in a special
assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 40. 82.2 (ALTA LOMA
FL000 CONTROL CHANNEL).
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Eleotinn Matters
i
' l C .A,Cif.`C ✓tip cc ucl�. � � 5 .
,7 ..._t� --
There Sre a number Cof poi icy 'items which must be adopted by the City Council
prior to the period when a candidate can file nomination petitions (January 12
through February 1). These policy items are:
1. Filing Fee: In other yeara we have set a minimum fee of =25.00 to cover
the administrative costs of processing the nominating papers.
Action required: Council needs to determine if they wish to change this
policy.
2. Spanish Language: According to the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, a
Spanish translation is still required. However, we do have an option as to
how we will meet that requirement. We may:
a. Target: According to the California Elections Code, we may
print everything in English as long as we note on the front of the Sample
Ballot in Spanish that the Spanish translation is available upon request to
the City Clerk. Only those Candidates requesting a Spanish translation would
be required to pay for the Spanish translation. The City would then become
responsible for the translation of the other Statements. (See attached
sample). A facsimile ballot in Spanish would be posted in each voting booth.
Because of an oversight on the part of our Vendor, we used this
approach last year. Spanish translations were not included in the Sample
Ballot. The Vendor ended up printing all the Candidate Statements separately
at their expense which were made available upon request. An interesting side
note, we had no requests for the Spanish. Money was refunded to the
candidates who payed for the Spanish.
With this method, there can be a cost savings in postage and
paper. However, since the Statements must be translated and type set, there
will be that expense. The vendor will produce a =star copy for the City
Clerk's use in making copies for those who request the Spanish.
Staff Report
Re: Election Matters
• December 21, 1983
Page 2
b. Complete: The County of San Bernardino uses this approach with
everything being printed in both English and Spanish. They take the position
that the Federal law takes precedence. Therefore, since the Federal Voting
Rights Act requires that all election materials going to the voter be in both
languages, they do not give Candidates a choice as to whether they want the
Spanish or not. If a Candidate submits a Candidate's Statement, the Registrar
of Voters has it translated and charges the Candidate his pro rata share.
This method would be the slmpliest to administer, and the least
likely to result in problems. We would be consistent which would make it
easier for the Vendor and the City. More problems are likely to arise when
some Statements are English only and some are in both English and Spanish.
It is staff's recommendation that we be consistent with the policy
set by the County in other elections and have a complete English /Spanish
Sample Ballot and Ballot.
Action required: Council needs to decide how we should handle theSPan13h
requirement -- to target or to go with complete English and Spanish and charge
candidates for their share.
3•``' Payment. We suggest a pro rata share of $300. Last election we
• charg.(�$175 amd ended up trying to collect an additional 363.00. Allowing
for inflation, it was felt that $300 would be adequate.
However, in talking with the County, they have worked out a formula
which has proven to be quite accurate. They charge $150 plus one cent for
each registered voter. At the present time we have 24,772 registered
voters. By using the County's formula, the Candidate's pro rata share for
Including a Candidate's Statement in the Sample Ballot woula oe $400.
Staff's concern is that we charge an adequate amount since it is
almost impossible to collect additional amounts after the election. If there
is an overcharge, the Elections Code requires the City Clerk to make refunds
within 30 days after the official canvass.
Action required: Council needs to determine how much to charge each Candidate
who includes a Candidate Statement in the Sample Ballot.
/be
is
12- 21- 01CR:baa
r!'
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO RENDER
SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF
A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON
TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1984.
WHEREAS, a General Muniepal Election is to be held in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. California, on Tuesday, April 10, 1983; and
WHEREAS, in the course of conduct of the election it is necessary for the
City to request services of the County; and
WHEREAS, all necessary expense in performing this service shall be paid by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 22003 cf the
Elections Code of the State of California, this City Council requests the •
Board of Supervisors of the County to permit the Registrar of Voters to
prepare and furnish to the City for use in conducting the election the
imprinting of the names and addresses of the registered voters of said City on
I.B.M. polling place inserts furnished by the City and after bursting the
forms to insert the polling place insert and smaple ballots into envelopes,
all to be furnished by the City, will place all envelopes in zip -coded mail
bags, advise City Clerk of the number of pleoes to be u.iled, prepare POD Form
3602, "Statement of MailIng latter With Permit Imprints" and advise the City
Clerk when work is complete so delivery can be arranged.
SECTION 2. The City Council also requests the Registrar of Voters furnish
to the City printed indices of the voters to be used by the precinct board at
the polling place, flags for each polling place, two printed alphabetical
indexes of the registered voters within the City for use by the City Clerk,
and will make available to the City additional election equipment and
assistance according to state law.
SECTION 3• That the City shall reimburse the County for services
performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a
properly approved bill.
SECTION 4.
That the City Clerk is directed to
forward without delay to
both the Board
of Supervisors and Registrar of Voters
a certified copy of this
resolution.
SECTION 5.
That the City Clerk shall certify to
the passage and adoption
•
of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original
Resolutions.
12- 21 -02CP: baa � •
RESOLUTION N0. • �' �:� ^�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ^_.A.LLINC AND GIVING
NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL
10, 1984 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE
CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW
CITIES.
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the alws relating to General Law Cities
in the State of California, a general municipal election shall be held on
Tuesday, April 10, 1983 for the election of Municipal Officers:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of
California relating to General Law Cities within the State, there is called
and ordered held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on Tuesday, April 10, 1983, a
general municipal election of the qualified electors of the City for the
purpose of electing two (2) Members of the City Council of the City for the •
full term of four years; a City Clerk of the City for the full term of four
years; and a City Treasurer of the City for the full term of four years.
SECTION 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be, in form
and content, such as may be required by law to be used in the election.
SECTION 3• That the City Clerk of the City is authorized, instructed and
directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots . notices, printed
matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in
order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 4. That the polls for the election sha;l be open at seven
o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously
from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall
be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 of the elections Code of the
State of California.
SECTION 5. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the
election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal
elections in the City.
SECTION 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is
given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give such
further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as
required by law. •
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption
of this Resolution and enter it. into the book of original Resolutions.
12- 21- 03CR:baa •
AESOLU ?ION N0. 83 -0 � 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS
FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO
MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS
THEREOF FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1984.
WHEREAS, Section 10012 of the Elections Cede of the SLaLe of California
provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations
pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election,
including costs of the candidates statement:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. FILING FEE. That in accordance with Section 22843 of the
election Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga hereby determines that each candidate for municipal office
shall at the time of filing, pay a fee of $25.00 to cover costs of processing
nomination papers. •
SECTION 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to Section 10012 of the
Elections Cede of the State of California, each candidate for elective office
to be voted . ^or at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on Tuesday, April 10, 1983, may prepare a candidate's
etatcment on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement
may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief
description of no more than 200 words of the candidate's education and
qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. Such statement
shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or
activity in partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed
In the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers
are filed. Such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the
period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m, of the next working
day after the close of the nomination period.
SECTION 3. SPANISH LANGUAGE. The City Clerk shall • (select option)
Option 1. aprovide a Spanish translation of the Oandidate'a
Statement to be included in the Voter's Pamphlet which contains the Statement
of each Candidate in both Rnglish and Spanish pursuant to the Federal Voting
Rights Act of 1965.
Option 2. aprovide the Voter's Pamphlet in Rnglish only with a
Spanish translation made available upon request. The City Clerk shall also
see that a facsimile ballot in Spanish is posted in each voting booth. •
SECTION 4. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to
include additional materials in the sample ballot package.
I LAI
I �
e,
M,
The following pages contain
CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS
This pamphlet may not contain a complete list of candidates. A complete
list of candidates appears on the Sample 8allot Each candidate's state.
ment in this pamphlet is volunteered by the candidate and is printed at the
expense or the candidate uniesi caherwise determined by c. ".e gceemmg
body
SPECIAL NOTICE. In compliance with the FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS
ACT. a Spanish translation of this material not printed in Spanish will be
provided upon request
Aviso especial pars traducci6n sspaRol
LAS DECLARACIONES DE LOS CANDIDATES
Este panfleto puede no contener una testa complete de candidates Una
lists complete de candidatos aparece an Is Muestra de Boots Cade decla.
racicin de candidato on este panfleto as voluntana por parts del candidato
e impress a costa del candidato a no set qua se determine otra costs For el
cuerpo de gobierno
AVISO ESPECIAL De acuerdo con el DECRETO FEDERAL DE DERECHOS
DE VOTACION, una traduccidn an esparlol de este materiel no impreso
an espafhol sera sumimstrada at sohcdarla
LAUREN WASSERMAN. CITY CLERK
9320 -C Baseline
P.O. Bon 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phone: 989.1851
449 VI /
• SECTION 5 `PAYMENT. That each candidate filing a candidate's statement
shall, at the time of filing said statement, pay a deposit of $300 to offset
the estimated pro rata cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing
the voter's pamphlet. Funds collected in excess of actual pro rated costs
shall be refunded within 30 days after the certification of the municipal
election by the City Clerk. If the actual pro rated costs exceed $300 per
candidate, each candidate shall pay that candidate's share of the balance
within 30 days after notification by the City Clerk.
SECTION 6. That in accordance with Section 4015.5 and 5015.5 of the
Elections Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga hereby determines that rebuttal arguments not exceeding 300
words may be submitted for each measure which will appear on the municipal
ballot.
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the
candidate's representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating
petitions are issued.
SECTION 8. That all previous resolutions establishing council policy on
payment for candidates statements are repealed.
SECTION 9. That this resolution shall apply only to the election to be
held on Tuesday, April 10, 1983 and then shall be repealed.
• SECTION 10. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original
Resolutions.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
is
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
0
U
F' I
nrmv nn n s vnvn nr rn vnvn ,
STAFF REPORT c�
r
DATE: December 21, 1983 s
lc --
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
SUBJECT: KAISER STEEL INDUSTRIAL PRESERVE
KG-A'—RO"-O The San Scrnardino County Local Agency Fe '� =Lion Commission
(LAFC) has directed a letter to the City seeking interest in the
addition of all or part of the Kaiser Steel Industrial Preserve into the
City's Sphere of Influence. This request by LAFC was prompted by a
request from the City of Fontana to annex 60 acres from the Kaiser Steel
Industrial Preserve. The LAFC denied Fontana's request and authorized a
study to determine whether either portions or the entire preserve should
be placed into the City of Fontana's Sphere of Influence, and to
determine what other jurisdiction would have the interest and the
capabilities for serving part or all of the preserve. Currently, Kaiser
Steel's representatives have not agreed to any change in their Sphere of
Influence status. They do not oppose this review; however, in review of
possible changes of ownership, Kaiser Steel has asked that the
Commission defer its official consideration of any changes until the
issue of ownership is determined in order that the fut_re owners of the
plant would have a voice in the dissolving of the Industrial Preserve.
ANALYSIS:
Existin�Conditions_ The Kaiser Steel Industrial Preserve consists of
approximRie 2, acres, or slightly over 3 square miles. It is
generally bounded on the north by Nhittram Avenue, on the south by
Jupura Avenue, on the west by Etiwanda Avenue, and on the east by Cherry
Avenue (see attached map). The Industrial Preserve is bounded by the
cities of Fontana to the north, east, and south and by Rancho Cucamonga
and Ontario to the west. The site is currently comprised of the Kaiser
Steel complex, which is located generally north of 4th Street. The area
south of 4th Street to the I -10 Freeway is typically utilized as slag
piles. The area south of the I -10 Freeway to Jupura Avenue is typically
vacant.
In reviewing this request by LAFC, staff focused its attention on a
smaller portion of the preserve which seemed a realistic candidate for a
sphere of influence amendment from a locational standpoint. This area
is approximately 260 acres at the southeast corner of the City and
consists mainly of the finished processing portion and storage areas of
the steel plant, as well as both the San Sevaine and Etiwanda channels
and the 330 KV Edison transmission lines with an underlying 600 -foot
'l '
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Kaiser Steel Industrial Preserve
December 21, 1983
Page 2
U
easement. The following discussion will outline the current agencies
which are now servicing this particular area, as well as what
limitations are involved as to the City's current service agencies in
providing services to this area if incorporation into the City's Sphere
of Influence is considered.
fire - (Current service provider - Central Valley Fire District) - In
discussing this matter wit hief Feuerstein, in order or the oot ill
Fire District to service this area, negotiations would have to take
place with LAFc t^ adjust the boundaries of the Central Valley and
Foothill Fire Districts. Currently, the nearest station at Etiwanda and
Base m ine Would be utilized to service this area. As you are aware,
there are plans for an additional fire station in the industrial area in
the near future.
Water - Current service rovider - Fontana Water Com an - The
ucamonga ounty Water isti t W as inalcatec, they woula not be
able to serve this area for two reasons: (1) no facilities currently
exist in the area; and, (2) they would have to renegotiate service
boundaries with the Fontana Water District. They also indicated they
would not be in a position to send any future infrastructure to the site
due to funding limitations.
Sewer - (Current service nrovider - Chino Racin Municinal Water •
into any particular jurisdiction would not make any difference with
CBMWD. They, as a wholesaler of services, would continue to contract
with any jurisdiction. In addition, the Kaiser Steel plant has a number
of its own private services (i.e., sewer disposal and water treatment
plants).
unincorporated areas o e ounty, is serviced by tne, San Bernardino
County Sheriff's Department.
RECOMMENDATION: Because of the service limitations of this area by the
agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga and the severe site limitations and
liabilities, it is staff's recommendation that the City Council forego
consideration of this area or portions of this area into the City's
Sphere of Influence.
Res ectf lly aVbmitted,
1
Rick GoMee •
City iPlanner
RG:jr
attachments
LOCAL AGENCY FORMA (ION COMMISSION
F.0 825 East Thvd Sueei, 2nd Roo- Room 201
A.
San Bernardino CA 92415 7141 383 2611
J - ,
October 26, 1983
Nathan A. Simon, Mayor Jon Mikels, Mayor
Jack Ratelle, City Manager Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
City of Fontana City of Rancho Cucamonga
Post Office Box 518 Post Office Box 807
Fontana, CA 92335 Cucamonga, CA 91730
R. E. Ellingwood, Mayor
Roger Hughbanks, City Manager
City of Ontario
303 East "B" Street
Ontario, CA 91764
Gentlemen:
•
At its October hearing, in considering a City of Fontana proposal
which as a part of a larger annexation involved about sixty acres
of the Kaiser Steel Industrial Preserve, the Local Agency Formation
Commission denied the Fontana request as to that part which was
within the preserve, but, authorized consideration as to whether
or not the entire industrial preserve should be added to the
City of Fontana's Sphere of Influence.
During the discussion, a question was raised as to the interests
of other cities which are also contiguous to the preserve, and
the Commission directed the staff to include these cities in
its review.
Kaiser Corporation representatives, while not agreeing to any
change in their "independent" status, do not oppose the proposed
review, however, in view of the possible change of ownership
has asked that the Commission defer its official consideration
for change until the issue of a change in ownership is determined
so that the future ownership could have a voice in the hearings
which might make a change.
The purpose of this letter is to let you know that the staff
will be actively involved in this issue in the coming weeks and
will seek your City's official position as to your interest in
the addition of all or any part of this industrial preserve being
added to your City's Sphere of Influence.
City of Fontana
City Ontario •
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
October 26, 1983
The first hearing on this issue is contemplated for January 11,
1984.
If you have an interest in adding any part to your Sphere of
Influence, it will be helpful if your position can define precisely
the area of your interest, the justification for making the addi-
tion to your Sphere of Influence, and your ability to serve the
area proposed for change.
The LAFC staff will begin its contacts on this issue in
m' ovember and hope to conclude in early December,
Very truly you rs,
LARq H. HENDON
Exective Officer
LHH:cl •
•
0
INDUSTRIAL PRESE"n'r'= - vA!c-R Ijn,'STRIAL PLANT photos taken 11 -15 -83
1. View of northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Fourth Street.
Note the overhead utility lines (SCE) in foreground and the
• two large industrial buildings (Kaiser) in background.
2. View of the east side of Etiwanda Avenue for length of area
under consideration. Photo taken at Fourth Street and
Etiwanda Avenue.
9
- I -- n1AL PLAN: photos taken 11 -15 -83
3. View from the central portion of the area under
consideration (approximately 1800' east of Etiwanda
Avenue and 2100' north of Fourth Street) looking at
the northernmost industrial building and the general
terrain. Main Kaiser plant is in background. •
4. View standing at the same point as in -3 looking a!
the southernmost group of industrial storage build'_
-s
and the general surrounding area.
•
INDUSTRIAL PRESERVE - KAISER INDUSTRIAL PLANT Dhotus taken 11 -15 -83
5. Close -up view of the south exposure of the northernmost
building. Phot taken approximately 2100' north of Fourth
Street and 2400' east of Etiwanda Avenue.
• 6. Close -up view of the north and west building faces of
the southernmost group of buildings. Photo taken
at about the same location as photo r5.
P
.� - - - - - - - - - . -' l i
FONTANA'�
d
/ ice: a�.y!�r •�'. . ; =1 i_ � ".... �.i
-
�-- -RANCH
S:
CUCAMONr. ,
�._.
Area UM
{Aa04erati - ____._ _ __
I'
a i
MONTANA
4�A
t t
�7
I�
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �ccn.MOk
MEMORANDUM �.
� A- >
DATE: December 21, 1983
TO: Members of City Council ��,/ ///
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner e
SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENLt
ND A LINE
Recently, some preliminary grading and tree removals were completed on
the northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line. This work was to be
done only in conjunction with a residential project, Tract 11797,
proposed by Elite Development Company. However, the residential portion
only occupies the northern portion of the corner (See attached map).
Mr. Jack Tarr of Diversified Investments owns both this site and the
immediate corner. Staff has been in contact with Mr. Tarr and with Elite
Development Company and have notified them that the removal of the trees
within the new commercial area of the site have been done without proper
authorization and is in violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance.
After reviewing this with Mr. Tarr and Elite Development Company it
appears as though the Development Company mistakenly directed the tree
contractor to remove the trees within the overall area rather than just
within the boundaries of the actual residential development.
In our enforcement effort, staff has asked Mr. Tarr for a comnittment to
replace the trees which were the most valVabie. Mr. Tarr is willing to
work with staff on an agreement for the replacement of these trees which
amounts to approximately 8 specimen size trees ranging in size from 36"
box to 48" box trees (See attached letter).
RG /MV /kep
CC: Lauren Wasserman
Jack Lam
_1 u
i
r
+1
lei
�t
J 6
z 1
11
Elite Development Company
December 21, 1983
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA (91730)
Attn: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
RE: Northeast Corner Archibald s Baseline
Rancho Cucamonga
(7221 Archibald)
Sycamore Investments, Joint venture
Dear Sir:
It has come to our attention that the City of Rancho Cucamonga
feels we are in violation of an ordinance due to recent removal
of certain specimen trees on the above referenced property.
Per the attached tree removal permit, please note that applica-
tion was intended for location 7221 Archibald for removal of:
"...north property line eucalyptus in line of storm
drain required to be installed by City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Department, palm trees at
random within slab removal areas -- balance are orchard
remains ".
Slab removal areas occurred on the Baseline property line, thus,
it was misunderstood by the developer's on -site construction
management that permit approval did not evidently include all
parcels.
In lieu of our violation, we hereby commit to replacement of the
following specimen trees upor. approval of commercial development
and landscape of the Baseline property line parcel:
5 each ..... 48" Box Specimen Trees
6 each ..... 36" Box Specimen Trees
17581 Irvine Blvd — Sumo 107 • TusUn Cahloima 92680 • (714) 731 1820
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
December 21, 1983
Page II
Any questions may be addressed to our on -site office at (714)
987 -3373,
Sincerely,
a .
ere sa Hagez, P o3ect Manager
ELTTL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
/t
attach
y
FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
P. 0. Box 35
6623 Amethyst Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701
(7,14) 987 -2535
December 13, 1983
Lauren Wasserman
Rancho Cucamonga City Hail
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Lauren:
During the December 8, 1983, meeting of the Board
of Directors, the District Board directed me to
request a joint meeting between the City Council
and the Fire Board. The suggested date is Thursday,
January 5, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. If this is agreeable
perhaps the meeting could take place at Lion's
'Community Center.
The following items were suggested for an agenda
from the Board and the Council, I assume, could
add items of interest also:
1. Redevelopment Agency
2. Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act
3. Master Plan Capitol improvement funding
Please let me know at your earliest convenience
as to the meeting, date, time and location.
Thanks for your continuing cooperation, it's
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Richard A. Feuerstein
Fire Chief, Board Secretary
mbm
FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
P. O. Box 35
6623 Amethyst Stnaet
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701
(714) 987 -2535
December 13, 1983
Lauren Wasserman
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Lauren:
During the December 8, 1983, meeting of the Board
of Directors, the District Board directed me to
request a joint meeting between the City Council
and the Fire Board. The suggested date is Thursday,
January 5, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. If this is agreeable
perhaps the meeting could take place at Lion's
Community Center.
The following items were suggested for an agenda
from the Board and the Council, I assume, could
add items of interest also:
1. Redevelopment Agency
2. Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act
3. Master Plan Capitol improvement funding
Please let me know at your earliest convenience
as to the meeting, date, time and location.
Thanks for your continuing cooperation, it's
appreciated.
Sincerely,
fie/
Richard A. Feuerstein
Fire Chief, Board Secretary
in bm