Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/04/04 - Agenda Packeti ' G~~CAMp ~~ ~'> • _ ~ r O s U > 1977 0171' OF CITY QOUNCIL AGEI~II~ Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California April 4, 1984 - 7:30 p.m. A11 items submitted Eor Che Ci[y Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Nedneaday prior [o [he meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. R. Roll Call: Auquec Dahl , Frost _ Schlosser , and MSke is • C. Approval of Minutes: None submitted 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONE A. Thursday, April 5, 1984, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COfLMISS ION -Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. R. Tuesday, April L0, I984 - MUNICIPAL ELECTION DAY C. Tuesday, April l0, 19A4, 1;00 p.m. - PRESS BRIEFING FOR ELECTION PROCESS - Upland Ci[y Nall Council Chambers D. Tuesday, April l0, 1984, 8:00 p.m. - ELECTION CENTRAL - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Ltne Road. F,. Wednesday, April ll, 19A4, 7:00 p. m. - PLANNING COM1ISSION, Lions Park Community Center, 9151 Rase tine Road, F. Thursday, April l2, 1994, 7:00 p.m. - 19th STREET CORRIDOR STUDY SUBCOMMITTEF. MEETING, Lions Park Community Cen[e r, 9161 Re se. Line Road 0. Tuesday, April I7, 1984 - SP F.f,IAL COUNCIL MEETING - Saeari ng in of newly elected fity Count ll members, City Clerk, and City Treasurer N. Presents[ ion of Proclamation declaring April as Child Abuse Prevention Month. City Council Agenda -2- April 4, 1984 • 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-coot rovers ial. They will be acted upon by the Council a[ one time without discussion. A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 84-4-4 and Payroll 1 ending 3-22-84 for the total amount of 5443,341.06. B. Alcoholic Beverage Application (AB84-07) for off sale 5 beer and wine license to Vito Giordano, Nole Ln the Wall, 9668 Base tine Road. C. Approval of Bonds, Agreement and Final Map of Tract 7 12414 located on [he vest slde Of Beryl Street, south of Mignonette Street sugmitted by A-M Company. RESOLUTION N0. 84-76 18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING • IMPROVEMENT ACRF.EMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 12414 D. Approval of Ag reemen[ and Security for street L9 construction et 13245 Victoria Street, east of F.as[ Avenue subm it[ed by Mike Perez. RF.SOLUTLON N0. 84-77 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORMA, APPftOV ING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND [MPROVEMf.NT SECURITY FOR 13245 VICTORIA STREET E. Approval of Bonds and Agreement for D.R. R3-17 located 26 nn [he east side of Ramona Avenue. north of Foothill Boulevard submitted by Andrew Barmakian. RF.SOLUT ION N0. A4-79 4L A RESOLUTION OF THF. CITY COUNCIL OF THE f,ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREEt~NT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT RF,V IEW 83-17 F. Approval of Bonds and Agreement for D.R. 83-IS located 42 nn the east side of Archibald Avenue a[ 7th S[ree[ submitted by Martin Jaska, Inc. • City Council Agenda -3- April 4, 19R4 RESOLUTION N0. R4-79 48 A RE ST LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALLFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW H3-15 G. Approval of Ag reemenc and Security and Agreement for 80 CUP 83-04 and an Aq reemen[ Eor Sapphire Street Improvements, located on the west side of Sapphire, south of Banyan Street submf tied by the Alta Loma Ch ris[tan Church. RESOLUTION N0. 84-BO 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALLPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT • SECUPITY FOR CUP 87-04 AND AN AGREEMENT FOR SAPPHIRE STREET IMPROVEMENTS II. Approval of Lmprnvemen[ Extension Agreement submitted 92 by H. Y. Watt for Tract !0045 located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north side of the Hillside Channel. RESOLUTION N0. 84-R1 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE:MENT SECURITY FOR TRACT (0045 L. Approval of Supplement to she design contract for the 98 [ra Ef is signal at Carnelian Avenue and Lemon Avenue. City-initiated changes In [he design of the Smprovements at this location have caused the need for considerable additional design and drating time by the conaultan[. J. Approval of Change Order No. 2 for the engineering and qq survey se rv is ea for Beryl S[reec-Hellman Avenue Storm Drain (phase I) by 8111 Mann b Assoc. Engineering and survey services are required to determine the existing topographic conditions within [he existing earth channel. These services will provide the neceeea ry cross-sect lone for dete Sled construction earthwork quantities [o become a pat[ of [he bid advertisement on the Beryl Streee/Hellman Avenue Sto ris Dreln (Phase I). City Council Agenda -4- April 4, 1984 l; C , J K. Author Lza[Lon to adjust appcopriaclon for community 104 information pamphlet printing and to recapture appropriation previously authorized during [he 1983-84 budget process. L. Approval of bonds, agreement, and final map of Tract 106 11915-1, located at northeast corner of 25th Street and Turner Avenue, submitted by Lebrect Horoes. RESOLUTION N0. 84-82 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECDRITY AND FINAL MpP FOR TRACT II915-I M. Sec public Hearing for May 2, 1984 for appeal of Planning Commission Decision denying Environmental As sessmen[ and General Plan Amendment 84-01-C: Acacia. • A request [o amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Office co Medium-High Res idenetal (14-24 du/ac) on 3.58 acres of land lot a[ed on the west side of Archibald, north of Base Line Road - ppN 202-I51-33. V. Set Public Hearing for Apr11 I8, I984 for Community Development Rlock Grant Program for fiscal year 1984-A 5. 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. NON-ADVERTISED HEARINGS A. REGULATIONS REGARDING THE SLAUCHTF.RING OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS - An Ordinance requlatinq [he slaughtering of domestic animals within the C1[y of Rancho Cucamonga. ORDINANCE N0. 222 (second reading) ll6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO f,UCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RY ADDING CHAPTER S.OR THERETO TO REGULATE THE SLAUGHTERING OF ANIMALS Cicy Council Agenda -5- April 4, 1984 B. DAY CREEK COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 84-1 - LOAN 117 PLEDGE AGREEMENT - An Ordinance approving agreemene supplementing Loan and Pledge AgreemenC between Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for funding of Lmprovemen[s of DayJE[iwanda Creeks in conjunc[ton with Community Fac Llities District No. 84-1. ORDINANCE N0. 223 (first reading) 121 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR CONTRIBUTION FROM LAWFUL FUNDS TO PAY FOR CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES IN A COMMUNITY FAC IL ITI F.S DISTRICT C. AN ORDINANCE INCREASING PENALTIES - An Ordinance to 122 increase penalties [o the level authorized by Government Code Section 36900 and J6901. ORDINANCE N0. 224 (first reading) 123 AN ORDINANCE OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 1.12.020 AND 1.12.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL GOOF. RELATIVE TO PENALTIES 6. CITY MANAGF,R'S STAFF REPORTS A. LANG AND WATER CONSERVATION GRANT FOR SELF.CTFD 124 IMPROVEMENTS AT ALTA COMA PARK AND LTOt75 PARK - These two project tnc lode [he installs[ ton of four tennis courts at Alta Loma Park and two tennis courts and picinic area Lmprovements at Lions Park. The projects are submitted under a 50-30 cos[ share category with Cicy con[rlhution on the former at 574,000 and the latter 550,000 from the Park Developme n[ Fund. RESOLUTION N0. 84-83 127 A RF.SOLL'TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TWO APPLICATIONS FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUNDS POR THF. LIONS PARK TENNIS AND PICNIC AREA, AND THE ALTA LOMA TENNIS _ COMPLE% DP.VELOPMENT PROJECTS City Council Agenda -6- April 4, 1984 r B. RECOlA1ENDATION TO PERFOAM~ A PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATION 144 STUDY - The City Council during the 1983-84 budget process indicated an interest [o consider undertaking a personnel class if scat ion study. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 8. ADJOIIRNMENT "~~ ,~ i r i\•\ o . ].• • r e , ~ ri r iJY ~ Y • ] t • i ~ ..rff .., • P . ).. • • • O .1 ~ ~ Y <; • • • \ r ^ fr~r~ ~~ffV 1.+~ 1 . 1 , I l • f I \. 1 1 ~ > . , ., ~. t rI • • r r.f r ~ • ; .1 1 '1 l f i f{ t 1 . 1 ] 1 1 •, • ( i t 1 1 1 ' , 1 < \ \ \ i 1 I ~- I< 1 1 1 j t 1 .~ ] . \ ~ s i i - < ~ 5 I •I i.: iJJ.Y ).LI I . ,1.\.t .. l :•.w ~\ ~ ~ S S y .~ J .i~ ~ ~ i : i.:.. ! 1..'i :?'i e .f ii i ~..~ : ~ ~ s ~ . . t y ~ ee .. i ' =~~ 1 I ~. J.n/I ........... ~l~1 q 4 ~,. a N, ~ .: a. .: ,. .1 v i; LLI a ` `E i a o. ` a ~~ t Y i ~ LS 0 J 1 1 J ~ e Y ~ SI n 2 1 K ~ 3 1 1 p. f e llI U Y~• ,i~' J v.J^ r ^~i 111 J~ V~10 J ~ OJ`r l•1OJ" r1 .lIJJ VJY pM1 •P'OO l'I ONJ JJ.FOrn JJ ~>ym ~nmo. Y T-. 1.1•r - VmY ~ V b~~.l • PVT n ° . .. .ri r s~ .. . ru~w..~ -~ ..Ir -.~~ a P.~r - J PJ If}1 ~ woe. J •L G L ~ J I J] 1 1 ~ J J ~ OY •.1 1 1 1 4 yl .1 ) t ~ n i e .r ~= i ~ .,s • J ~~ n {~{ . ~ ~ t . u J =~ _ ~~L ' r l ~ " Ot` ~ L f N •v ii ~ V < 1 '1~- ;. 1• - a.J ~" 1 i .) l t I .r s . < ~ " J :J ~ Jl ~~ S) J L A 1' ' u.t ~~^ Y ~ Ci~ r J n 1lv ~ J ~' i6.~ t ~ i~J ~ a .. I' J it J J G - J .J ~ R V1 J, I f LL I u .ALL. ~. .~J~E ~']Y Y.J-y 1200 ~ ,-1 WM ~2 JA•1'>Jf I y I (•1JLLL I.J W i .l[ i 41 ~ ~. jV1N l- u O .. Jln ~.l. r< .1 [¢M~ C^OtiDL 1 Y ]~~ f i,L1J' C la C~ u ~ 1 ~n • r ~~ C J 1 JUN Jr-~n fl •.~iu LW -"1Rtt >!~•-` J ~ J ~ lf] ,nvM 01 i ] LIiW J J; J JLu1 -n(Q 1 Cr~-LLN V:1 [[eLl)) i~ N~ Y..~ ~J Y,V <N Y 1 I r'~W lp${ ~J(6 ii ~NV7 .LA ~ Y.L"[ 0 ~N a.a ~)JL~3 ~L .L Lt< fur rl ~L~CniJ )1~]IL 2[ JS<WW L'.q' ate{, itEwr mmiwu V WVV WiI.N •..I .i00 ,.. ;.,. x /mow I'nP la a r ro yp ~^ C 7r~ ~ TI ` /Ln wit, .. .L » IP ' ~t~ ~ •" ~ ~ t~ ,r) /1 L t j iu u Y . +) .) .. > 4 r .J r n 1 a J ).) ) ) 1 +i .i I ) + + \ u ! f 11v]JJ• )r I+i'JJ~ r'a:.a )I )) ~ •S/•f) J)n.V ~:u. 'rV .r .1 `a ifafaf~ ISIa• 11f. ~r l.I i r!y )i' 1a~) • \I ~r JIJ a•Yi1 ~OYA~.I V J J. + .~• • .4 f V ~ J \ • .1 • ~.. • f N^ n -0 M1 . . <.1 ! J . - 1 I' .a r 1 I :.Y ] r. ~1 r. L. ~ 1 i . J ! r\ f ') ~~ ~ Jr VJ441.•~1 •ff /•1' •1)I=rII1rI F i ~ r; .,Y ,: 1 \ 1 1 1 '~J ~J r J \ \ \ 1 :;.,~ _ . f ._ ..:, ~ , :,: -_ °~~= ;~ ~~ ~ - r:~: l... r . A 1 1 t \ ~ ) 1 \ a ` r r. t 1.1 n + . l i,~ ~J) G 1 + r 1 _ ~ [ r.l . I ~.• Jr J~J[1)I ~li•r^ tl•1' +). a..11 •Cr, ~.1 • _ GTYy1 ] a CA^ •.. = •\~.,.... Irl .) \=, < r 1 ..` ;,= r r\.a .(.y S G.1 S rR i L r Z 1 i J r. i t .l'\ 1 r\ L J T r ~ .../r > J K n I,1 1 ~ /I •YL •_ •~G 4.}r a ;.G i't • ~rG ). ^ I ; <'I + a•i.i ~.\ - ~ •Lr •, 1 ( C T ^+1 : l\ ~ ~ L ~q] 1 i 1\ R ~i ~ Y u w 1 = ~ [I i V) I ) ) rr ~ < V R { Y!!J r i( J N r (..r I.r1., <rX •:I.G<.) +IrL.IM L• 1 I~J1 L:~: ar4rlrV1L~1~:[^ Jull ~Nr•tT •Gil.a.[.1 ~(IrI LL( r (• Y~ ) YrY I; I ~\V•!u C ll'Cti <J I'Sii~.=Lr'1 M1~. ~. ra l{CM ~ ; wflM~Y.\)fqn )i0 ]T1•.w u.1.;T?f,9 J'anu\Y rJ.+\01~an.Y Yr~J .M1 ±YnM1r\ ±ArO al '\i lYw yii Y\.^..^.+fnp.N~~'~1' n'\n\a +]d.IJ ~~ ~. 4:. ~ 1 i I ~ ~ f ~ -, 1 , •1 r~aa la'J r.., n4 aq.1 a?~~ :a..[~f~-.a a. y <1 ~Jr.=^.. ~..; Vnl'~Y aV..:..~f.a A..i an jl I I < L 1 • V a • r! 1 ~ i l r J a .^ L~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~~ _ _.•~ . ..1~_ tn•I F~yny _ _ ~rri r I J [ ; i ..... ... • • .. ... . ...... • ... • . • .. 1 1 /1 J 1 ~ I L 1 n . .• . . ... ' .• . w [ L! • S f [ = f. . _ i _ it ..i~Il I n I 1 1 .1'1 .1 1 1 J~1 i 1 1 t . a n I ~ 1 ] •h 'J ( {n 1 - S IIQr •Y [''. [- ,'_' ~ 1 < 1 < . ' :~ .~ ; ;- i ,. ,,, _ ;,~.; ,.;', ,.! t ~~ y" - LL. C~ _ 1 I ~ a / I.l r5.- L~rx _u.'i.ar~ •~•~•t 1 1 f 1 .•t+ 9 , '{ 1 .. C~; ). a • i L 1'[•1.1 (^J •L~a.IP'L[1LI L-{Ii _' 1<i11 l•J 1.1 ~ .[ x`.,.[1'11u 1~2[12'~5~,['" 11'=..j`J i. L )JK-t ,1~ f 1 Ctnu))9+R ~~ lJ~l 1~).J6 ~~(•~+n i11 i i~~J lYR ' ~ ~Y 1 r a~L LI(~nNraNN N•\'\ IINN xrN•~INNN.IJ I ' Y1 I f LI n• 'l aaa~'yf ar'~f. r~s•aTr P 'i ~1111r 1'Y A.\rr ' - ~ ~ 1 .; N~Ia Y.i~ .w•V r. +1~M1.x Ix IV (Y~a~9.Y~Ix .a I :f r~rJJ~~ ' ' 1 I.NNNVi y.t.J 1119 na11.1..\ il..l ff'1 1 1 .. 1 I . • M •w ftle~a<rw•M4.1 Ywr ~rlr•W/W <I M•r ~. AMYpT1pN 10R AlCO1103f~ RMAN IICOOfl3) 1 )YttI31 Of IICEN5f1]1 fe! NO. 1w D~wNln M MdNlk r+fM CwM 1[ei rWr'N iaY J~TnAiEleu ff gala Jeer' e, ~.lne [EIn~ Nr~qp~ ~'1 NClI]6~66 Sesrrwr, UM. 9f 11 ~.......~........,..~ G[OGfaMIGI caa lels tM rnasr.Rpd Ir.<N[.rrs~ l.. rr<w.,, ~.f.+.. r.1... Oel• I<wd x. NAMf(s7 CM ApRICAN1151 T•m!. Iwrnl V .,Ad:in.~0, Jito aNf.a arA•r ][c xnu ca ^ [Bwaw Oww • J-1 fllwew M 8-81 s. tnRS a TuNSarnorxsl fe[ fK. r.te s~ ~: 1. a Npm• d Iwnw .iola In Tae nall ]. twewn d Mwn.•.-N•mar W sy..l 3evd ~aael one dv~. Coy wM L~ Cpa• Cwnl[ .aacna ~.xa. ua a f l7 ~ I. ..ai ~.roar~ >.. ip[u ! 50.00 .r•n•<n rn.w SNp. iYW el4<•nw ~).Z flry 4mrnt I. MPIiM AAeryu lil aIM•w Ilpll ]I-IIerM•/ aN SpM '< rrl .. aac affirm. v N•r• Yeu •.w w•n <pn.ene d a IdwY} 10 Nm Ywr •.w .robwl wr[ d Mn pe.rwn d rlw AkMaF< ' 1••wsp• CeM<N 4< w .•Iubliew pl rF• D•pprWwl pw. in.rq re X1• a<IY ' • I I f.plein o 'Y[]" pnr.« N.Nmr p w 10 0.. w anwRmwr ..N<R Jrpll N dwmN pwr d rN. eppF<ee•n. Apolrtanr apr•n ler rbl •nY Tenq•r •mpb.M .n en.wl• 4 roue w•mnx ..11 n • pll r4• eyld<pnm< d a Irtn<••. eM w <evu ny yom 0 ~~pr ~• v~ll n .~oleN w w pwmrl re e• wgeNa a of rb por al rb IImReU< M.•my Conlrel a<I q STATf O[ CAUIORN4 Cowry el ..: an .~ r..... ..,~ '-1.-d. .............................. opl. _.........____..__...__.. ti rr< r .w• ..r..I r ~ • ar•+ a +wT~1 4 w ..ren .wn. r -o . ~.u.- n ., r. ~ ~ ~~ .o. w .. ....~ -.n ~ .. ~ i.yi.n r 11 ~N•liCaNT 9GN nfff ....................................__. v ................................................... .. .. ......................................... Af-UdTION RT TRANSf[ROR I] fiat OI CAlIlO1NIA [arnry el .....::t :+.. +. r:.Y' 4.1 1-i.-y~l ........................ CaN ........._.................. le Nom•el of tmwugOn ....r r ~~•.~• • .•• e.. I } synaon0' al Lo^w•'0 11 h<• • N.mpwrc . i[. lw•een NwnMr eM Sn••<- e• - Gry eM Po Nd WIYI Mlwf iM1 Lpw; fw Off+/Nnw•l L'w OIi1 Ana1Mr '~ SwwaNl n•Ik•. Q --AYL'~271. .. .. _CO~IS MMIID ...1.Li•YO... .. •..•n ^ \n•~RR IM af..... .A11 al.. .. ... .. _ OSM w ..... .Afwy/ Na ._... h w.~ M~ CRS?R D4 Wb~1G WT Y ou,.~t ~ItRUA Gan r7. ZCJYnIU LL9Lnoo Srluia:c.3 - ~Ra~~NC, a,«,~- ~V Zp S6evOR fitM~C 4AU.y6t - _ _ _ _ _ - - - -2~_~C~ue Ave `f~1¢ Nof~ iu f~,e lUacL~Deli is LocErrEa onl ~,e uo¢rH WEST CoF_RLe2 eC RQc/f/BALD AuD 3ASLiue w.-rl.~,~ tie A[fn 73ern SF{eGO,u6 Ceure¢. VI C~ AI ~i ~' ~' G r i I i N I L L___ • 1~/loPC2TY Cu¢QtuTL4' ~OUGD : A~e'161Ji3oQIJoaD ~emdfeQCiR CAI C~ GeNe¢~ 'PLa~, ~ ,(leioµvo~cNroa Cb+„~~.eoacC,ue~ ~o,ULrJL nF f~~c"SAr~L.rr i~izoGc2n FS ~ ~o2 rH - ~o P) OFFice L'u¢?[~ ~ Gu,e~e~t F~Lau fsRm,~l f~oFess~o,uRL Pnsr _ ~c~ of~,e~ v'hoFrssLOU.rc Sank _ C~vc ! L ~1 ~+,tiHdael6en Ce~nn. Law-Ms/u.~ ~i~, LL)EsT- CbY) GF{~ct 'GhaFrSi i o.upL • • C J - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAiYIONGA c~c'`No STAFF REPORT ~~' ^\^ ~'i> ~ ~ > 0ATE: April 4, 1984 ~ t9%% T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Huhbs, City Engineer BY: Jahn Martin, Assistant Cfvil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds, Agreement and Final Map of Tract 12414 located on the west side of Beryl Street, south of Mign onette Street submitted 6y A-M Company The attached resolution is for the approval of the Final Map of Tract 12414, consisting of 92 lots on 12 acres located an the west side of Beryl Street, south of .Mignonette Street. The bonds su Emitted by A, M. Company are in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 3292,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5146,000.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution granting final approval to Tract Map No. 12414, authorizing the City Engineer to sign the .Map and the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully su mitt ed, LBH:dM:jaa Attachments 7 ~~ i~ _~ ~~, ~--~ ~. ' i, - ~ - k t~__ J~ a I i I I ~ ! - ~I ,< a ! I '~i` ~ ~ ~ ` ~ M _~ ~~_ ~~.~, ~-- ~ ' `" ~'~ I~ ~I ~ ' TO MT` 1 r ~__.._~. ~~ s/~fA ~ I ti_r_~ r>~ I I~ L_(" I~I~ __ RM A' T ~J i i ~ 51~~ i H 6 11 R=J I ~I ~ _ .N _~ ~ ~ ~ Ur1is ~~._ .~~ I• ~ '~ TRACT N0. 12414 ~ \ I .' i ~ ~ r , , l.M ~ ~~.M.~ ILrI ~Mbu1~ •,L~ N i ~~~ ~ j TM i ~r tirwr.rb. ~ ~ w ~ ~~.,, ~ CHAFFEY Jd~NT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT o ~°"x'3..°'°~ a O E11 WEST FIfTX SYflFEi. OXT.N1O. CWNFOflNIL >I M] .ffn [rn ~ ~ ~ ~ 0,~, ysi4auf~ . wiVn "•" f f.w ... I .u.x c sx ~.x Emurmxu su xau curt^~~ moxi nano nn (O. nO OE rnVir ((f au FS~Sr} LF..E1 w M5.. ..EE .nfi ]Er' a+ f _.. na .v Wass ~ aa. • ra ~Sr[!S o.r a. vni0 a. rr.t (EY airsEv March 21, 1994 Letter of Certification of School District Caoaci u '4: rain the Chaf fev Joint Union Hiah School District and the Alta Loma Hi h School atten arse boun arses for the rn L'ow:ny- escrzbe aro7ect: i,o cation/De scriotion: Tract No. 12414 South of Mignonette between Opal and Beryl Rancho Cucamonga Number of Dwellings: 92 single family dwellings anticipated Completion Date: August 1985 The school district heresy certifies that the ca?acity _`or 14 students w:.1 be provided within 24 months of the comn.et:on of the above project. This certification is given or. `.o condition that t::^,e State of California continues to Fund she provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/?arc hose .\ct of 19?5, or ar.y successor Act, in such manner gnat the State All ccation Soar3 may fund all school bui_'dinc projects under its current roles and reculations wa gout -:sprit;+ points. The commitment of this capacity s::^.all erp:re 90 daps from the date cf this letter. Approval of the fi al mac or tae issua.^.ce of building permits by the City o: Raac:^.o Cucamonga withir. t`ae 90-day period shall validate sac/ ~^r~amec'. 9tlOGi~.:..6py@p.T.SSt. Superint° by Dianne Allen T~~- C am: 713,^..^.1..^.C D i :' : -: c n _._Y ~: Zan C!:0 GuC d^,O nC3 Phil Ve1ie AM Company Box 886 R,C., CA 91730 r'~ A-M P.~ `rpany ~ fEB Yt 1984 RECEIVED'ltd Loma School District Established IsRS BOARD OF TRVSTEES ROBERT S. FROST ROBERT W. TANGEAtAN MRS LIZ GALLA RI NI MRS. SA.4pM A. OERLT JONN C BOOR 9330~F Buelinc Road • lost OR{ce box 370 • Alta Loma. California 91701 • 7l4/987~07• JOHN E McMURTRT SuprMUnltM FLOTO M. STORK Irrtonnr45upp•rt Srmnt February 23, 1984 STACT NEISON Da t e Butmrtt srmro MILLI STMIN CumrutuMSprn•! /rwettr LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY For Residential Construction within the Alta Loma School District. DEVELOPER- A-M Company TRACT NUMBER 12414 LOCATION South Of Mignonette Re to:een Opal and Beryl Avenues NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS 92 single family units ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE_AUgust 1985 • Gentlemen: The Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 55.2 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This ce: of ication is given on the cord it ion that the State of California continues to fund [he provisions of the Leroy F. r>reene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any suc- cessor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this caoacity shall e:cp ire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 day period shall validate such commitment. Very truly yours, Floyd t1. Stork Administrator Personnel and Support Services • jh cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ ~~ ~_A VienAmnMf ROBERT NEU FELO ~UCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOVO W. MICHAEL D~••.b. • ~ ~ ~ ~ EAR LE R. ANOERBON BEVERLY E. BRAOEN VICTOR A. ONERBAK. lR.. Fmwn, CHARLES A. WEST March 23, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P. O. BoX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mrs. Barbara Rrall Gentlemen: A-M Company, A California Limited Partnership, Developer of Tract • No. 12414, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District a Material and Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement for waterline construction. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. In addition, this letter is to verify that the above referenced Developer has complied with all requirements for development that are mandated by District policy. Yours truly, CUCADIONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 1 i ~~.~f1I; j.~'~ L~ Betty Fien Secretary h ec: A-M Company C[TY OF RANCHO WCANONGA INPROYENENT AGREEMENT FOR ira<v II I4lA RNO~ ALC MEN BT THESE PRESENTS; That this agreement is ~ ' ma0e and entered Into, 1n conformance ritn tree provisions o/ tree Suodiv tsi on Map Act o/ tree State of California, and o/ tree appli<a<1! Ordinances of tree City at Ran cna Cuumong a, Cal if ornt a, a municl poi corDOntton, Dy and Detweln said City, ntf lire a/[!f re/lrrtd [0 a5 Lh! C1Cy, and A-Y Gowpany. A Calltornu Llpic etl - herelna ter r< erre to as t e ~ ' eve oper, Inc. denv rat Pa rt nec Y ITNESSETM: TXAT, NM ERE AS, said Oeraloper Desires to develop certain reel property in Bald City as shown on the conditionally aD Prov ed suDdivisi on knorA of us.u and NNEREAS, Said Ctty has eitaDl iihed clrt dire remuirementi to De met oy said 0ereloper as pr Heouisite to approval of said suedivis lore 9eneraliY lou tad at ~ . a..,,i .~e sawrn vt NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereoy agreed oy said City and Dy said Developer as follor s: 1. The Developer nercey agrees to construct at • Oevelope r'i lmpsns< all LDrov emenLf dlscrloed on gaga 6 h!r!- ol ru redo twelve moot ns from end e//active date ne r<of, 2. ibis agreement snail De effective on ene date of the resolution a/ tree Council 01 sai0 City approving Lois agre<m en [. This agrlem ant mall D! 1n default on tree day follow- ing tree first sore hers dry date of satd apOraval unless an eACen- ston of time nos Oaan granted Dy said City as nereinef car provtd- e0. 7. Tne Developer may repuest an extension 0/ time to complete ene terms here0(. Sutn reouest snail De to Dmi tted co ene C~[y in writing no[ less to an JO days oe(ore tn¢ eapi ration date here oi, and to dll CO nt dtn a Statement of Cir[umS Lances n ecesii Nting tree eat<nsfon o/ time. Tree Cf[y shrill nave tree r ignt to review the prpv titans of Lois agreement, including tree construction standards, casc estimate, and improvement seGUn ty, and to re0uire •df ustm ants tneretn if any su DStan [Let cnanye nos occurred during the term ne reo/. /. I/ the Oev eloper falls ar neglects to cpmply wf to tree provisions of tnlf agreement, tree Ci [y snail nave tree rign t. at any time Id Caufa Said pfOVf si ores Lo De me[ er any lawful med0f, rind tnl rlppOn f!<OVlf from [h! 0!vllOper ddd/pr nit fYfpty tree full cos[ and eADense tn<urred, 5. Tne OeveloDer snail provide metered water service to eacn lot of fetd Oarelopment In acc or Dance wi[n the regulations, s creedal es, and Teas of tree Cucemdnga Coun [y Mater OiS trl<t. 6. The Devalopar shall De respOnsiDle for replacement, relocation, or removal 0! any tdmponent o/ any irrigation water sysL lm fn tan/Itct with dpnstruc lion o/ required imOroremen tf to • tree sat is/action of tM Ctty Engineer and cna owner of such water system. -1• r,i 7, Im prdvem cots re pus red to be cpns[ruc ted shall con Porn to the Standard prow in gs and Standard Spec if is ations of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and an file in the office of [ne Lity Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated on the Construction end Band Est imatl, hereby incorporated on pege 6 Dereof, as taken from the improvement Dl ens listed [hereon by hum Der. The peveloper shall also De responsible for cdns[r uc. Ciao of any transitions ar other lucid ent al work be ypn0 the tract bound arses as needed for sale[y ono proper surface drainage. Errors or ommiss rons disco vered durf ng constructin snail be correcteo upon the direction o/ tee City Engineer. Revised rork due to said plan mpdif lcati0ns shall be cov <red by the Drpvisians• of [his agreement and recureo by the surety coven ng [he on ginal planned works. B. [a nstrrction permits shall be obtained by the Developer /r om the ofl ice of the Clty Engineer prior to start o/ work; ail re qulatlons listed thereon mall De observed, with att en[ion given to raft ty procedures, ca nt rol of oust, noise, or other nuisance to tee area, and to proper notlf station of pu Oise utilities and City peparCments. Failure to comply with this section shall bf suDd e<t tD the penalties prov lace [nerel or. 9. The De reloper shall De reiponsib le for removal oI all loose rocks antl other debns from public rights-of -wey within or add oining safd development resulting from work relative to s+fd oevelapmfnt. • 10. York done w Rhin existing streets shall o! diligently pursued to comple[ton; the Cf ty shall have the right tp complete any and all work In the event o/ unJustified delay in ppmplltion, and tp rlc0v lr all <p St dud eta enae incurred irom [h2 peveloper and/or nis contractor Dy any lew/ul means. 11. $al0 peveloper shall at all times folloring dedica- tion of [he streets and easements in seta subs oivisipn, up td [ne campiet ion and acceptance of said work pr improvement Dy said City Council, give goad and adeouate werning to roe traveling pu Di is of each and every dangerous condition etistent in ze id street pr easement, and ,rill protect the traveling public from s ucn detective or dangerous canditf on s. Until [ne comDlet idn of all improvements, herein incorporated on Page 6 to ba performed, eecn of said streets no[ a<ce Dted as ImprOVemen[f shall De under the <Mrge o/ Said peveloper. $dld Developer may close alt ar a pprtl on of any scr¢et subdect to the ConditiDns Contained in a Cem DOrary sir ee[ cld sure Oermit, its ued by tot Clty Engf nel r, whenever it is necessary [o protect [ne pu 01 lc during the conitruc[lan of the impravem en ti herein egr eed to De made, 11, ParNwey trees repuirea tp pe planted shall De planted Dy the peveloD er after diner imprd vemen[ work, grading end cleanup na3 been cdmale[ed. Planting shall De done as provided by Orolnant! in accordance wi to the planting diagram approved by the City Community Developm en[ pirec [or. ine peveloper shall De respansib le for maintaining all trees pl an [a0 in good hf alto until the ena of the guaran tee0 maintenance period, or far one year alter planttng, rni<never 15 later. U. The Developer is respansi ble far meeting all <ondt- Cions of tool is hfd by the C1ty pursuant to [ne Su billy isl on -2- r MaD A<t, CitY Ordiances, and tAfs agreement for the development, and for the maintenance OI all improvem cots cOnstr uctl0 [Acre under until the impr Orement is accepted far maintenance by the City, and n0 improvement security provided Aereinwi[A shall be released Def Ore SuCA acre D[once unl<if OtherMise pr ovidtd dn0 aucnon :ea Dy the Cfty County I of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance goon nt ee security hl re trio ftcr described has Deen rll eased DY cAe City, Or until a new a9reem <nt tpge trier with fn< required improvement security Aai De<n submiCL ed to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resoldtlun of the City Council sale Aai Deen ac<e pt ed, and tAfs agreement and the improvement security therefor has Deen released. 15. The improvement security to De furnished by cAe OevelaDer with to is agreement shall consist Of the fallowing m0 shall De in a PoA a<Uptable Py cAe City Attorney: A. To secure faith( ul plrf orm ante of this 19reem enc. 1. A Done or bonds Oy one or more duly autAOr [zed corporate id noes In the Porn and content s peciH ed Dy Gov <rnm¢nt Cade Sec [ton 66!99. 1. 2. An Improvement Security Init rumen[ in ene form and cantlnt fpe[5f5ed Dy the City Attorney. 7. A deposit wf th the City of money or negOClable bonds of the kind approved Ior securing aepOSits of Du01ic monies. B. 7o Secure la0orers an0 met erlalmen: • I. A OOOd Or Dppds Dy One Or mar! duly duthOrit<d corporate sureties in cAe /orm one content spec [tied Dy Government CoOe Sec[f On 66199,1. 2, An lmpro vem Brit Security Instr um<nt in cAe form and content specified Dy the City At[orn<y. 3. A deposit ~wi[A City of money or OegO[f able Bands p/ the kin0 app ra ved for securing C. A coin deposit wfch the City to guarantee payment Dy cAe Gevel00er [o cne engineer or curve ypr who!! <e rf if state appeaR uDOn [he Final MdD for Inc setting of all DouOd ar y, lot corner, and street centerline monuments aria for furnishing centerii ne tie nOC es to fhe City. Tne amount of the de Doss[ may De any amount certllied Oy the engineer or surv ey0r as acce0[aDle payment ~n lull; or, iI no value Is Suomi tied, the taco Oond shall Oe es shown on [A! Cans trettl0n and Bono Estimate COntdlned here ln. SN d cash deposit may 6e relunded as soon as Droc e- dart pefmlti diflr reCel pt Oy cAe City of the centerline tie notes an0 Written assurance a/ payment In full from the engineer or surveyor, B. The required bonds and cne print tool amounts thereof an set forth on page 6 a/ this agreement. l6, The Oe velaper werr ants to at the imprOVemen es descri Deo in this •9reem ene shall be /ree /rom defects in materials and wOrkmanihip, Any and alt Dor[ions of roe improve- ments Pound to oe dt}ectlve eft Ain one (1) ye er following cne data On which cAe Imp n ve merits are accepted OY cAe City shall be repaired Or replaced Dy Developer free o/ all cA ar gas t0 cAe City. TAe DevU Doer shall furnish a maintenance guar ant!! 5¢curity fe a • sum equal to ten percent (l0i) 01 the cons [ru[ttOn •7- r ~~ e s[tmate ar 5200.00, whichever is greeter, cp secure the faith/ul p erfprmdnce of Dev elope is 9DIigaC, ohs as descn bed to cots par a• l u y a l a r t n T o( the gat ron oDi of an y 0ev e10Der he Dy perfocmnnce faatn /ut Devil Opef t0 d0 SDec tT ilO work with re5plc[ t0 any parkway mdint<0 ante dSte SSm ent dlStf ict, OOC[ Cne tmDr OVement5 hdv@ Deere a<c evteO and a mn nten ante gu ar ante! security nas been accepted ay [R! ittY, the Other 1mDYDV Im lbt Sl Nflty dltcrtbld ,n LAtl agreement may be r4leas<d Dr oviOed :n a[ sucn release is otnerwase autnOn xed by the Subdivis ton Map Acc and anY apDli<aDle Lfty Oratnanee. , I). That tn! OIVQI OpIr Snd11 tak! OUL dbd inai nt dl0 Such public 11aDilicy and Dr Oper ty damaq! ,nsurance as mall prOtt<t R,m and apy c00t NCtOr Dr SUDCODtrac[Or plrf Ormtnq work covered Dy to is agreement from claims Pow prpp@rcy damages which may arise Dec aule Df the nature DI tn! work Or fr am OD@r of tons under tots ogreement, wneth of Such oDeraf tone Oe by nsmietf pr by any contractor Or SUDCOOLN[tOf, Or anyone Otre[tIY or intl ireCtly employed by said persons, even though such tlamagls Oe oat ceased Dy the negl igen [! pf the Developer or any contractor or cube pntrdc[or Or anyone lm D10yl0 by rata persons. Tree pub L c i,abd lily ano property damage insurance mall I~st the Lfty as additonal tns awed and Directly protect <hG h tY. rts of liters, agents and employees, as well ai the Developer, nas contractors and his su0cp nt NCtc 's, ana all insur an<@ p0ltctes tsiu<d Hereunder 5114)7 SO 121[1. Tne mintmum a;OnYnti Of SuGn InSUrdeC! snd11 be as fo110w 5: A, [ontr ac tot's liability +nsurance pr OV,d+nq bO di ty 1 [na f not 255 fb]ury pf d!a[h llabt li [y IlmttS O 1700,000 tar each verspn and SI,000,000 far each do ci0lnt Or Occurrence, and DraDerty dam age liabil- ity limits DT not less enan 5100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate Ivn,t c,f 1250,000 for claim[ which may ar ~, se from Cne pDera- [fDns of the Developer ~n [ne partannanct of the work hereto prpv+eea. 8. Au [ompD+le 7i abf if ty ~ns~r >nc< cover inq ill v @n,cl es used in the perfaraance of ;n n ag rxemen; prov,d~ng Ooatty ,n)ur) ~~ m~l.[Y Stotts of not less loan 5200, 470 for tern carsan and 5300,000 f.r each act [dent pr O<ca rrtnca, dni 0^np er!y Jama 7@ llabi ltty Itmt [f of opt tV4s [h do 553,000 FOr taco acc{dent or occurrence. note to taTrtgac< Of no[ I@SC to an 1100,000 notch ray arts[ rr pm the opera- ti0ns Of the Oev <l apar Ur hr: Cantrac tar :n per}orming the a0rk provided for ntretn, :d, Thdt Oef Ore the eaecun on la tots agreement, the beveloper shall /tie w,tn the Cicy a eerctf teat[ ur cart +fic ales of +nsurance car er ing the spec tf led insur ante. Each sucn cer[if Kate Shall Dear an 2nOp rs t'~e nt prec'udtng Lne Cdp[¢Ila[tpnt, or rl ducL100 in cOV<f dqe Of eny policy evt denclS Dy sucn cer[tTicate, bef Ore tn! eaptr alt On of thirty (10) nays diter the City Snell hdv! received n04t: is a[tOn Dy r¢gtS[if ed ma,l from 6n6 insur an c! tarn er. Ps avldence of understanding Ibe arpvtstpns cpntatned herein, ana pf intent t0 DOmply wtro same, [n! Subdt vtder has suDmt [tea the fallowing des crf bed 1mpr OVement secure ty, end nes df/feed His s+gnntur! her <t0: -4- I~ r FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE TYDe: SuR67Y Gav4 Prfnc10+1 Amqu nt ~292~OCn. 'y N+me and +ddreis oI surety: AHCPrU Af MD70RIf7T /NSwRANL6 MATERIAL l11O108 AEOR PAT ENT~A~[Il3, ~A~rydp57-dqt? TYpe: Su¢c~(6nt[D Pr lncipal Amomnt:~ IV L, 000. ea Nue and +dOresf of surety: /IHEF?ILAN HO70RpT5 /NSURANLG [ASH OEPOS T MO IIM(ryTATION TYDe: CASH Principal Amopnt: f /• ~ G,Soo,- Name and address of surety: - NON E MINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Pr lnciDal Mopnt: Hue +nd +dd refs !/ Surety; TO 1E -OSTED PRIOR i0 A[CE-TAN[F 6Y THE CETT Ih YITNESS HEREOF, the part les hereto hove ceased these D res cots [o D! duty executed and acknowledg ep W th +II • /orm+lltlef rlNulred Ny 1M on tot d+tls set fa rth o posltc Lhetr f llf na[rr lf. ~/ A-n Cu.P.nT A Llmf [ed Pa¢nerahlp Oa[! ~ -/ !~ $ q fy Auulo Yuence 6 CompanY~ Inc. -General Pa r[ncr ,Oere toper ,eiLgeu re dd// Ionel Prez[ar~r rime D+ee Nr ,Oevlloper IOnature r tote Rancho Cut am on ga, l+ pal Cp rDOr+t ton Gy. , Mayor AtLesL: LY er AD Droved: ~." '- OEYELO-ER'S SIGNATURE HOST NE NOTAR IlED •5- • [~~~ ~ ;, CITr a RAnnlo LvcFlldnDA COnSTP11CTIM ESTIMTE EROWLCI{tEMT IEPIIIT FEE SCOEOIILE for ItlPrD+smt o!: >I c Date: aa[cn s l onp9te Dr: .+ ~ area [I t1 OK• Iq. rou: f l R e Pr i e (MITE: OOPS rot 1ro1WP arre\t /K !DI Sw1tiM gel~tt M PpttfeRt depositf. COnSTRUCTIOn COST E)TIXATE UAYTITY UNIT ITGI PIICL AMDXT 1,1{! L.I, 6C.C. ur0 - {" C.I. 31" {Y[[a[ 600 ].)10.00 a5 L!. A.L. MrP •.10 393 d0 f,1le 3.1. 1' LO.C, afaawlt 1.T5 9,Itll.fO 5{0 S.I. Dr1vY ap[wc\ 10 1.50 1[,150.00 , Y0 5.0. a"L0.L. crow ry[w[ lla[. CY[\) • ].10 1606.30 , 6000 C.Y. S1va[ aacnat wn 1.50 D 13 •,WD.W 910.00 1] ll9,eW 3.f. tnwution Yt wWraaa NS S.I. LrwaYO aa{• ww (w[ anA 1\f[U(a") I . , , 010 ]011 A.C. (6rYr 000 copal 3 11.00 31,1 TORO , 1,1)1 S.r. l" t\ld A.C. orrtly 0.10 1,310.10 l) G. Ya1Ya[ a1Y•r ~YMaIY to {[Ma 3)0.00 xfa.W ], 1 G. Aalua[ nw[ Clan OY[ to 6cA0a 130.00 600.00 • 31 G. aAIYY[ w[ar vllvu [a {saaY 5[wv[ ll{AU )1 G 8.00 1000,00 l,5Tf,00 )I,OW .00 . W L. P. LI[[1C1AU (loun¢. (500 LLe) 1.00 300.00 1,135 L.P. 1111° rtYYnnY Iw10Yr 1.)3 I,Y1Y.if l1 G, 5l nr[ a[{na 2W.00 1,IW.DD x G. MF 4<[on +YO poa[I ]1.00 10.W 30u L.l. IY to (xOW D) 15.00 S,OW .00 11 L.I. 3P tG1 (l5W D) J0.00 7x0.00 )oo L.I, lo^ Lcr uaoo m le.oo 161w.oo ] G. C.[[I, OIYIn Y . 1' 1300.DD I,IW.UU L G. Ca[c\ DYUn V . tl' 2W0.00 1,000.00 1 Ii], Gt<D Ouan V lx' IOW.UO 1,000 AO 3 G. bul 01p[u YlYn 1' 100,00 1,000.00 i G. LYUI avp[va+lun li' 1000.00 3,000.00 a,S65 S.I. LYnO¢Wlna Y l[ryatlon .3.13 3),55]. if Io L.r. Lou cYr\ (r.c.c,1 3.>o mD.W •,115 L.I. P.O.C, cote - 1" C.Y. T1' {YL[ar 1.31 19,016.31 CONSTRUCTION COST < n, e[ coxnlwtncr cows , ,~ TOTAI CONSTRUCTION a~[ ro fAITHfUI PEAf0ANN3EE SURETY (1001) x91.ooD .oa LABOq AN0 MATERIAL SECURITY (SOY) tae. ooo .oo _ _ EIIGINEEgINO 1N51ECTI0N fEE 11 .1no .oo •RESTOMTION/DELInfATION CASN DEPOSIT ~.ooo . oD~ (PEfUnDAaLE) ® IMlA1N1EXTATiON SWE7Y (CASH) 6,do0. oo Ww3Yrot to Ctq m a6nrM CYCiroN9{ WNICtPaI Code. TIt 1P 1. OWtq I.OB, 6doptlM SaR 4rnardlnD Covet/ Code Tltlasl CAagl1NY ' 1•S, a Cash mtorulaM/atflyanro aep{It SNall a t11W pr1o1 to IttP.Nte a/ ro 41MIaa{IIM Ca{troctlM Ia1~1t. -~ RESOLUTION N0. 04~5CIt/ 5'4 ~ ~(G • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12414 'aHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12414 consisting of 92 lots, submitted by R-M Company Subdivider, located on the west side of Beryl Street, south of Mignonette Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHER EAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. YON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VEO by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same • on hehalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as goad and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on ~ i e s, ayor ATTEST: n ~J Lauren M. Nasserman, ,ty er ~aa I r 1 U CITY OF RANCHO CliCA;V10NGA GCGMp STAFF REPORT -~ ~'`-~ ~;~;~. a io Y' ~ j~ ~~~ ~} '~~~~~Z V v > DATE: April 4, 1984 - "" TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Mubbs, City Engineer 8Y: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement and Security for street construction at 13245 Victoria Street, east of East Avenue submitted by Mike Perez Attached is a resolution for acceptance of an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of certain street improvements in front of the subject property. A time certificate deposit was given to the City as security for such construction. RECOIMENOATION It is recommended that the Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. Resoectfutly submitted, as Attachments ~,~ l~ ~ ~ $TnEB i kk a E w Pa +~ hr Y hr ] Par ~ ~' ~- li~~ 1t37 a.l In ~ tey QtT j ~~ t .. ', 511E ; ?' , .. ~, - - - -_._.. ,zl - -- ------ - -- -__.__-_ .~--...__. ,-. ~- ..,..., r ---- --~=e - - .a. - 'W K -p= - 'q_ _-~~--_ --~-- ~r~°%"A~~~'`;, CITY OF RAfVCHO CG~10T1GA ~~+'~ L ~, ~ Z ENGINEERING DIVISION im VICINITY MAP ~,~, // N poge C ITT OF RANG NO CUCAMDNCA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PA?C_L 1 cf rdP C[L :'AP 6914 RN DV ALL MEN 8Y THESE P0.ESENT S: That [his agreement is mad! and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of [he Munf <ipal Code end Re gu Ltions of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal cp rppratipn, hereinafter referr- ed to as the City, by and between said City an0 =!AEt a. PcsEZ c •lu.zP xe Pc PEZ hereinafter re/erred to as the eve peer, THAT, NN EAEAS, sate Developer desi n_s to de ve sap certain real DropertY in said City located 1JZa5 °;cepraa '?a Yet 1 of ~ •. •6^P ~ dnd RNEREAS, said City nos <st aDlfshed certain reouirements tp De met by seid Develpper as prereputsf to to granting of fines approval; and NNEREAS, the eaecut ipn of this agreement and pasiing o/ lmprov eme nt security as her efnof ter citee, one approved oy the [icy Attorney, are deemed to be epuf valent to prior cpmptetion of seid requirements /or the purpose of securing said approval. NON, THEREFORE, it fs hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: • 1. Tne Developer hereby agrees to construct at Develop er's expense e11 improvements described pn page < hereof wl[hin 12 monthf frpm tht Date hereof. 2. ibis agreement shall be of let Live on tnt date o/ the reT Olu:ton of the Council of said City appra v:ng this agreement. This agreement sn all De in default on the day follow- ing the first annfversery date of said approval unless an eaten- ston of Lime nos been granted oy said Lily as hereinafter prpvld- ea. 3, The Developer may r-e guest add: ti onal time in which to complete the provisions of this ag•eem ent, in wn sing not less than 3D days pffpr to [ne Ce /cult date, and including a statement pf Clr['Jm St anC Of pI neC255i :J fpf ddd"tt an dl tame. In [ppslderd- ttan Of SUCn reel es2, Ln! Llty reserves [ne flgnL tp rev Lew the prpvisi ohs hereo/, in<ludtng construction ze an Bards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and tp require aoauitmen [i thereto when warranted oy substantial <h an yes theref n, 6. II Me Developer fails or neglects [o cpaply with the provisions pf this agreement, the Li ty shall have the right at any time to cause said proves ions [p De comole[ed by any law- /ul means, ono thereupon to recover /rpm Said Developer and/or nfs Surety the Iuli cast ana eap ense into rred in so ao in9. 5. Construction permits snail be abeaineo by the Devel- oper tram the of/ice of the C1[y Engineer pn pr to start of any work within the pu bl lc rtgh LOf-way, end the developer shalt conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations cOntaineo Cnerein, Non-compllan ce may result in stopping of the cork by the City, and dasessmMt at the penalties pr ov idea. 6. public right-af-way improvement work required Sha11 Oe constr uc tea 1n Con loan ante with approred improvement plans, Stand era Specs/ic at Ions, ana Stanaara Dr +wings +na any special •1- S.f., D.R., Aes., P.M, ,CUP rl' amendments thereto. Can st ruction snail Include any tr ans~tions and/or pthlr incidental work tleem ed necessary for dr iina9e or pu0l is sa1lty. Errors or ommissions discovered Curing construc- tion shaVl De cOrrlctetl upon the oirec tton of the City Engineer, Devised work due to satO plan modif icationz shall De covered Dy the provisions of this agreement and secured Dy the surety covering the original planned corks. 7. Nark done within exist ing scree is ih all De dtli9ent- lY pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to cpm07et! any and alI work in the event of unjust tf red delay in comDlet ion, and to recover all cost and eap ense ~o[urr ed from :ne peveloper and/Dr his contractor Dy any lawful means. B. The Developer shall De resDO ns iaje fror reol a<emeri, relocations, or removal of any component of any ir•tg a:;on water system in conflict w[th the r!lutred wart to the sa[izf ac tion of the City En gtneer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer sD alt De respo nsiDle for removal Df all loose rock and at her de Dris from tDe Du Dlic nght-Dt-way. 10. The Developer sna71 plant and maintain parkway trees as directed Dy the Com munfty Development Director, 11. The improvement securi[y co De fprntsnee Dy the Developer fo guarantee completion of the terms of tots agreem en: shalt De suoject to the ap0r ov al Df the City Aa crow y, the Dn n- ciDa1 amount Jf saitl improvement se cu rtty snail not pa sass [non the amount mown; • 2 . dd FAITHFUL PEflFORNANLE Type: Pn+c ipal Amount: s ;,•, ,_` name and address of surety: MATERIAL An0 LA 800. Type: Pn ncipat A',,oust: 5 1,1; p. ;- Ndm! dnd dddre5f 0/ SpflLy: LASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type; Pr nctpal +maant: Name and add rest of surety; TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN YITNESS NE 0.E OF, LD< parties hereto have caused [nese presents to be duly eaetuted and ackn o'w le^. ge with all /oral hies re0.uired Dy hw on the dates set fortn opposite their sfgn atu re s. Date .~ %- F Dy YI1.'•:. Q MTa~ti Oevetoper lgnat~ge '2CCIAEL i, PCPLL • n nted Date '~~; y Dy ~~'A r'' Developer • lgnature Pnn;ea 9ubsui eNaendeworn to Gfon me Ac cepLed: Hie deY of 19d~~ Notary Pubec al Cllifamie City a1 qan cho Cucamonga, Cat if arpid A NunicfDal LOf DOrdLl on OFPICtAL SCAL KAPNtlfN C GtUWAY MO111,7 rV alK~UlI1011Y1A gy; .na'~n- arA elwWma tgKn M s.. q,~war.NA Act eS t: ,ny C•e•I %•j ~_ Approved: 1ty Atiprney OFYELOPEP'S SIGNATURES MUST BE nOT PRIZED 1n u -3- r' ~ ..7 cnr of RANLMD coCAJIOnGA CONSTRUCTIOn ESTIMATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCMEWLE For Improvement pf: JJ:45 ' a laa cal t of a4 rc el vac a?]v~ Dd[!: -ems x'94 :,c tor: Ompuf<d ay: file Re ertnc~CitY ~9• No. MOTE: Opel irot Include arrant /ee /or writing penis ar pave~ent deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE ITEM VAN Y U4IT SNIT COST S RMpUNT P.L.C. Curb - 32" C.F. P.C.C. Curb - B" CaF . .............. 1:4 / L.F. P.L.C. Curb only 6" C.G. A.C. Berm (5200 mi n.~ 4" P.[.[. 5'dewalk ............... .. 41u / s.F. 6" Orive AODroach R^ P.C.C. Crass Gutter Street Excavation ............ ...... :. s. importe0 Empmkmtn[ Preparation of Suhgr ode ............ ]54 / s. F. Crushed Pggreyate Base (per in, [hick) A,C. (over 1700 tans) A,C. (900 to 1300 tons) A,C. (under 500 to 900 tons) A.C. (under 500 tons) .............. 4 ions Patch A.C. (trench) 1• tM Ck A.[. ~OvtrleY ~•~-~~~•••••~•liz; s..-. Adjust sewer manhole to grade Ad}p5t Sewlf QNn pp[ tp grad! Adjust water valves to grade Street Ltgn is Street Signs Street Trees Parkway Landscape and Irrigat+on l 5 .i.:: L. S. .. •.... r~ U 1 5 1CO.cp 1 5 p. 155.F. 5 ;S.CC 1 SJ0.0p son 5 11 p.:J 1 5 ]. SS.F. 5 4:5.'f~ CONST WJLTIOY COS", ' CCNT ;,';GEVCY COST. _ TaTAt coesTRUCC mN FAITHFUL PEPF00.MANCE SURETY (100X) LABOP ANO MATERIAL SECURITY (r.OX) _ ~•1-~•-~ ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE •REETOPAT1011/CE~INEAT ION CPS'd CEPOSIT (REFUNOABLEI MONUMENT AT ION SURETY (CASH) - - <PUrsuant to City of Rancho Cucamn9a Municipal Cade, Title I, CMpter 1.00, a0opetny San Bernardino County Code Tlt les, CDapters 1-S, a cash restoration/deltMation deposit fMll D! Made Drior t0 Issuance pf an En9lneerin9 Construction Penis. -G- • a '-~ RESOLUTION N0. ,9y.04~9dC11'~ Ss4 - 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 13245 VICTORIA STREET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on February 29, 1984, by Michael R. and Valerie Perez as developer, for the improvement of public rignt-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 13245 Victoria Street, east of East Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to 6e done in conjunction with the development of said real property; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is fdent if ied in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said . Improvement Security be and the Same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cu<amonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on a s, ayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, qty er j as i LJ n \J C J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G~GMp STAFF REPORT ~~~., „~~ r GATE: April 4, 1984 19~~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Rssist ant Civil Engineer SUBd ECT: Approval of Bonds and Agreement for D. R. 83-17 located on the east side of Ramona Avenue, north of Foothill Rlvd. submitted by Andrew Barmakian The attached resolution is for the acceptance of an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security Instrument to guarantee the reconstruction of Ramona avenue north of foothill Blvd. The project will install apartments on the east side of Ramona Avenue and was conditioned to install storm drain and street improvements. The security offered is a hank security instrument far E132,000.00. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Agreement and Security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Agreement on behalf df the City. Respectfully ~6mitt ed, L H :jaa Attachments a~ -- -__~__ .. . -~___' _~ a ~. ~ I, I t__...~.. ~ _ ,. i_____~ ~ _~_-__~._ f ~.~...~... ~ ___. _____ I_T______,_.~_T_ /~f~ Ii _______. _,..___~ _____ _ 'f--3 `-`-`-- --'-~- ~--~' --'~^ys ---.-- -- ~ _ J' - ~----------- . p I _J r _~ '_I~~ _ -1-~---~_~L e ~i I '~~ "'--------, - ~~ z rt {V ~~ S1 O ~EVELOPMEH' REVIEW 83-17 ~ii~ YM1rr YV~•RY~~7n E~~1 1 y C ~AUCAMONGA COUNTYSWATER DISTRICT ~. 0. AIM S]• ~~).1]11 VICTOR A. CMERlA K. JR.. Pq.Nen1 March 9, 1984 The Barmakian Company 9375 Archibald 'Avenue Suite No. 101 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Availability of Water and Sewer Service for Parcel Map No. 8100 Gentlemen: n..-r...d.,1 ROBERT NEUlELD Slr rlY ny, GIwIW \/a nl Mr LLOYD W. MICHAEL Rrrr<or1 EA RLE R ANDERSON B EVEq LYE BRAD EN CHARLES A. WEST The above mentioned property can receive water service from • this District, subject to pipeline extension policies, rules, regulations and rate ordinances of this District. Adequate waterline and water storage capacity exists and will exist to serve the above referenced property at the time of occupancy. The sewer system capacity and the sewer treatment plant capacity will be sufficient to serve the above mentioned property at the time of occupancy. Yours truly, CCCAPfO;:GA COL::TY WATER DISTRICT Catherine D~awk ~' Encineerirtg Aide I bf cc: City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~ CHAFFEY JOfNT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ~..•°°~~•~!•~~°R O 311 NFET EIETH STREET, (IHTARIO GtVORNY fl]6S xun •..t v ! ~ ~ r..f,r . .v ' +..lx ae.r., Va or..+ry •a i+r cv ~,v !RU[•r~ova Sl nvit<F [tV tE• u, rx oxt il~ti l+l F4~1 !O!!°°I ,RUSii13 ~+. ofw C.nr f3 0 !°yr,.~aal +i<!r•ST Ot xr xw r xu wp+ Y!l~o. eaf ex c[!•ao x x°a+ . r. N Tt y, l+3 [ xxxT.y Cvat3 i vn aa( January 23, 1984 Letter of Certification of School District Capacity Within the Chaffer Joint Union Hiah School District attendance boundaries for the foilowing described project: Location/Description: Parcel X1 of parcel map X8100 NE corner of Ramona and Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucanonga, CA Number of Dwellings: 68 apartment units (52 two bedroom, the rest one e • Anticipated Completion Date: -August 15, 1984 The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for to students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California cc ntinues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building protects under its current rules and regula*_ions without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. ~,c.nt.~.K II.LoCR.~'~PY~ S6~,pxH aKpAkagt/Asst. Superintendent by Dianne Allen cc: Planning Division ~La.d~.U.A- City of Rancho Cucamonga ry AGREEMENT BETWE'CN THE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR DING AND • ( V LO R)~ FOR FINANCING PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES AND ESTABLISHING FEES FOR SUCH FACILITIES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 22 day of February , 19 g4 , by and between the CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, a school district of the ~*_a to of California (hereinafter referred [o as "DISTRICT"), and THE BAMIAKI,4Y COMPANY (hereinafter referred [o as "DEVELOPER"). WI'INESSETH: WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is desirous of constructing residential dvelli ngs within DI S1R ICT: and WHEREAS, the public schools for grades K through 8 will be inadequate [o se ne the pupils who would be living within [he residential dwellings to be con- structed; and WHEREAS, the development is located within [he Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred [o as "City"); and WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 86 provides Chat adequate public services for residential development shall be avails hle; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has requested :hat the DISTRICT advise City chat ade- quate school fatilicies are or will be capable o: accommodating students generated by the proposed prnjec c; and 6'HER EAS, DISTRICT is in need of funds in order to proecde adequate school facilities for Students generated by such proposed project; X06', THER EFOP. E, the•pa r[ies to the Agreer~ent mutually agree as follows: 1. DISTRICT shall provide a letter to DEVELOPER capable of Compliance with Ordinance No. 86 of Cicp, upon exeru[ion of this Agreement, which letter shall advise City that DISTRICT will provide school fatilicies for children '?G living :n housing antes proposed to he constuc red by DEVELOPER. Said letter shall not, however, advise Ci[y that a building permit shall be issued. 2. Upon payment to DISTRICT of the amount of Si,725 for each single family • dwelling unit and the amount of 5862.50 for each multi-family dwelling unit, DISTRICT shall provide a further letter to DEVELOPER in accordance with Ordi- nance Vo. 86 wherein DEVELOPER is advised that DISTRICT will provide school far ili ties and consent to the issuance of building permits. 3. DISTRICT agrees that it will use funds paid herein solely for the purpose of providing for school fat ilities of DISTRICT, which purposes can be for either permanent or ten porary far it i[ies. ~• DISTRICT agrees chat it will provide school facilities for the purpose of providing education for pupils who reside in the dwelling units being built 6y DEVELOPER known as Tract Yo. DR 8317 5. This Agreement shall bind all successors and assigns of both parties, and DEVELOPER agrees to notify all successors and assigns of the terms of [his Agreement. 6. DISTRICT agrees that the rec eip[ of the sums paid shall mitigate all impacts caused by DEVELOPER upon DISTRICT. 7. DISTRICT agrees [hat it shall, upon req uesc, make available to the public, including DEVELOPER and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, an annual account of coneys received ar.d disbursements made under the terns of the Agreement. B. DISTRICT further agrees that it will make applicactnns and keep appli- cations current for any and all funding for new capital outlay construction and shall actively pursue and ¢ake •+igorous efforts in seeking such funding, whether such funding he frcm local sources, the Stare of California, or anv agencies of the Unite^. Slates government. 9. DEVELOPER agrees that DISTRICT may retain and may use the suns here- tofore paid DISTRICT 6y DEVELOPER, notes it hscand ing the outcome of any litigation • regarding the validity of the fees. 10. D'cCELOFER agrees co .'a rve the right to commence any litigation againsc DISTRICT for the purpose of seeking [he return or reduction of any fees paid • DISTRICT by DEVELOPER. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DEVELOPER and DISTRICT have caused this Agreement to 6e signed in their names and on their hehalf by [heir duly authorized repre- sen[a[ives. DEVELOPER: DISTRICT: ~~„~\ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ~'_--- OF SAN gERNARDINO COUNTY, ~~ r~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ _ , _~ ___ _~^` AlfDREW BB vIAK[ ,President Superintendent ~By I -}_ 8y ~ ~i CITY OF 0.ANCXU CUC AMON6A INPRUYENENT A6REEXENi FOP OEYEL OPMENT RE VIfM 87-17 KNOM ALL MEN 8Y THESF pR ESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with [he provisions o/ the Munic lp at Code and Regulations of the City o/ ganchm Cucamonga, State of Californ ie, a municipal carp or anon, hereinafter re/err- ed to as/ the Lity, by and between said City and Ae~~•~•I' IT:a~an'Y~k%.4~<\ hereinafter referred [o as cne eve over. THAT, NNEREAS, said Developer desires [o develop ceri ain real pr0per[y in said C1ty IOtdtetl on the east Side of Ramona Avenue, north of Foothill 87vd.; and WHEREAS, said Ci[y Aas elt abllihetl certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequ isi[e to gra n[1ng o/ final approval; and NNEREAS, the enecu ttan at this agreement and pos[tn9 of improvement secur lty es hereinef ter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent fo prior <ompl etion of said requirements for [he purpose of securing said approval. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and be Ween the Lity end the Developer as follows: 1. The Oevet oper hereby agrees to construct at • dGVelpper's expense all improvements described on page a hereof within 12 months from ene Gate hereof. 2. iris agreement shall be of /ec[IVe on [ne dace of the resolution pf the Council of sa10 City approving this agreement. Tniz agreement shall be in default on the aay follow- ing the first anniversary dote of Bald approval unless an ext a+- siDn of time has been gran fed by said Llty as hereinafter Drovld- ed. 1, The Developer mdy re0uest additional floe :n wh :cv [0 complete the proves uns of this a9r Bement, in wn[tng 9p[ 'ess [non 30 days prior tD :ne de edui; date, and including a slate ^le^t of cir[um st antes 71 n¢c¢551[y for dddlt'.onal ['ne. in cp'ISldera- LIOn Of SUen regJ¢SI, t'Ie Lity relerVCS [he right [0 r2V:2w [!I¢ p Y0V1110n5 ner¢nf, 1nCIJdI^j C091[rV![10n StanOdrdf, ¢O St eltima[e, and Su/liciency of ;ne Improvement secure ty, and tp require dd~V Stm¢n[5 Ineret0 Then wdfrd9t20 by SUpSt dn[l dl Chdn Jel t herein. d. .f ;ne DevelDper 'ails or neglects cq ca cooly wi;^. the provisions of this agreement, the City shall nave [ne n ght dt dny [t me to tau le Shc,t prOVll:Gns tJ 'Je COmp!eted ny any '"an• ful medal, dad thereupon In r°CO I2r /rOq Sd10 DeVelOpef dnd/Of his Surety cne lJii cost and expense incurred in so doing, 5. ;onstruct eon permits sn all Se optainetl by the Oeve'~- oper rrom the al/ice of the Eity Engineer prior to start o/ any wOfR Allntn the pVbI1C right-Of-tl ay, and Lh! ',e Velop er shdll conduct such nark In ful! compliance wi M cne regulations cp nl alned the •eln. Von-c OmplidnCe ray reSU It in StOppinq of [he. e0rk by [he Lity, And del element of [he Dena It eel provided. 6, public right-of-way Improvement work repaired shall • Oe cons[r acted in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specific a[Inn s, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Constructlpn shall include any transitions C1~ ~~' and/or pth er incidental work de!m!d necessary far ]ra~nage pr public safety. Errors or pmm~ssipns atscpv<red dun n9 consiruc- tion sn all be corrected upon the Direction Df 'tne C'ty Engineer. Revised work due to tditl plan m0dif icati Ons snail D! covered by the Dr aviv oni of this agreement and secured Dy the Surety Cpv H ing [ne on gin al Dinned works. 7. Mork done witnin e5ii[ing streets in all D@ diligent- ly pursued to completion; the Uty sn all nave the right to cDmplet< inY and all vork i~ Ine event pf unjutt if ied delay in comp lettpn, and [D ret0v er all cos[ antl evp <nse incurred from the 0<velaper and/or his contractor Dy any lawful means. 9. The 0!velop er sna11 De resDpnS able far replacement, relocations, pr remcv al o/ any component of any irr iga[iCn water system in :pnflict vita [h< repaired work to the zatisf fiction of [ne City Engineer and the owner of the water system. g, the Developer shalt De resDOnitb le for removal of atI loose rock and other debr~i from the pub lac rigAt-p 0.way. lfl, The 0<vetaper shall plant and maim atn parkway it ees as diraGtltl by the Community bevelopm ent OlrlCtpr, ll. Tne improvement security tp De Porn lihed Dy the Bevelooer to guarantee completion o/ the terms pf tha agreement snail De subject to the approval of the City Attorney. Tne prtn- cipol amount of said impr ovemen[ security shall not De lest than tn2 ampU n[ thONn: • ~ 1 FAITHFUL PERFOgMFN[E Type: Principal Amount: fG8,000.00 Nam! and add re55 Of surety: MATERIAL AND L~80R iYpe: Princ ~~Dal Amount: SEa, OCC. CO Name and address Df surety; CRSM OE POSIT MONUMENTIITION Type: Principal ampun [: Ndme and address of surety; TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO RCCEPT~NCE BY THE CITT iH 4{SNE-LS.~E NEOf, tAe pa pptMttc~~ nereto Aare caused tAese presents tp a duly eieeuied and a(knpwt d9e witA ell tprmat sties reRu;red /o Ty er on the da~~t e~{stet / fttno~osite gNeir slgnatu res. G,tln"' L Mt VP ~~_1~~Devetppar 19n u oY Develo Der . ignature Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali/orn is A Nun ic~pal Corporation 3y: A[[ X ayor ~:~Y uerr Approved: /`.r•rI i~ .' { AitY 0.tt )rn~ ~ OE YELOPEA'S SIGNRTUAE$ MUST RE NOi NA ISEO • 7 7 CITY aF pIUKNO CUCNIOIIW COMST0.UCTION ESTIMTE EMCROl1gMEi1T PERN17 fEE SCNEW.E for Improvement af: RMOna Are. (yes[ half fran Footnill to StA 5.76.70) pate: 3/21/134 - -- - -Comov led by: ~nacal =nernq _ File Re erence: -. City JNg. Na. 853- IgTE: Does cot include NrtMt tee for witiig penit or pavtaaent deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTINg1E REM VAN lm [T UN(T CAST $ d'fOUNT Const. var iaole th iciness A.C, overlay fi,700 S. F. 1.00 6,700.00 Adju s[ sever manhole to grade 1 Each 705.00 750.00 Subtotal T-'i3:~ (IgTE: IDis IS CitY'S portion of the aork. Ilp construction penlt fe! if chMgld !a this portico at the ~urkj A95i RUGT;ON .; OST :ONI 7AEVCY COSTS TOUT CJNSTA'JC7:9.1 FA [iiFiJt NE4FCRNANCE SOR E;r ,t'Mtl lA3pR AHO NdiERI AI 5'c ^UAIiY , EC•.1 E NG LVEEAI9G ;YSPEC 7;0Y FEE •R ES iOR di(OB/JF_(YEAi ION :nSN 0E?OSa ;AEfUVOd3lE1 NOYUNEgidil JN b'iP tTY ,:A SA) •PUrsuant to City of MMChe Cucaon9a Municipal Code. Tltla 1, CMOter LOO, adopting SM 8ern+rtltno Counq Catle lit les, Chapterf l-fi, i nsh reatoratfan/delineation deposit spill pe aude prior to Issuance of M Engineering Cpnstructfon perwit. -S a• .~. ~ r cm a g11NCH0 cllvnBliw • WNSTRUCTION ESTINIITE EXCXOMMEM PERMIT FEE SCHEgILE For Improvement of: Ramona Ave. ;East half from FooM+I~ tb STA 3+41.7:1 Oa[e: 7/21/94 ,.omputed bY: :naca~ .n rn File fle ereec~i 3l~Hf~C ity ~'s+g. No. XDTE: Goes [at inc]We [uKML iM for writing permit a DareXent deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST EST;XATE ~Tey U Y OVIT JN IT COST $ AMOUNT Const.3" A.C. over d^ A. B. 6790 S.F. 1.25 7,988.00 Cons[. 'Jar fable thickness 1'70 S F 1 00 I, 170.00 A.C, oven aY Lonst. d" P.C.C. Curb 8 Gutter 720 . . L.F. , lO.OD 7,200.00 Const. P.C.C. Sidewalk 1195 S.f. 2.40 2,868.00 Install Sereet trees 9 EA. 100.00 9W.W Cons[. Transition Coilar i EA. 600.00 600.00 Const, Nhml Chair Aamp 1 1 fA. EA 700.00 00 2 )00 700.00 2 300.00 Con st. Catch Basin " JO . F L , . 771.00 , 190.00 2 0..C. P. C on st. 27 LOCaI OeDress+an Conrt 1 . . EA. 700.00 , 300.00 . gemove e.i sting A.C. Pavement 3818 S.F. F .50 00 12 1,909.00 180 00 RMave esistin9 needweil 6 750 . L. f S . 1,50 . 525,00 Remove lei sting concrete apron 40 . . F L 00 27 920.00 Remove existing block volt Remove power vale (bY Ed isan Cp.) 7 . . EA. . 2,200.00 6,600.00 Adjust vat er mater to grade J l EA. EA 700.00 400 00 900.00 • 600 00 Adjust telephone bae to grade 1 . EA . 200.00 , 200.00 Relocate voter meter 1 . EA 1 200.00 200.00 1 R elpc ate fire hydrant 2 . EA , 80.00 , Ifi0.00 Relocate signs 2 . EA 0 7P O Street P, 9hts . Sab~ata 1 L`H'iS'SII 7 , &V STR'J CtI LY ':OST SFE nAGE 1r, :74T ;'.G EVCY C057S .,, ~ .CY5~9'J Ct:JV FAITNPJL PERFCR9ANC'. SURETY ~~100. LA800. AYO yATERI AL SECJR ITY !50%1 EVGIYEER lVG EY iP EC 1:04 FEE •RE>TGAAT;CY/OEL!VEAT iON :AS'd OE°OS;T ,qE F'J'+LA9LE1 YO40HENTA7[ON SURETY ,CASH) •PUrsuant to City of Rancho CucaaM9a Nun iciPal Code. Title I, Chapter LOB, adopt inq San Bernardino County [ode Titles, Chapters I-5, a cash rcstorat ion/delinea3lon deposit shall oe pade prior tp issuaMe of an Enyi neerinq Lonstructlon Petit. -1b- LJ - l~ J CITY Of RANCHO [U[NMINGl1 CONSIAUCTION EST11UtTE fNCROACNNEP.T PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For [mprovmMt df; Aamooa Ave, tiEast half frpa STA 341.71 to il A 0.76.70' Oat e: 7/Zl/8d pmpu~n aca tlArn9 File 0.e erencT-eT3:~33~T--]~[y 7wg. No. 3$~--' MOTE: Does rot itrcluDe curtmt te! for writing penit a Darbalxt Deposits, L ORSTAULT:ON LOST ES71MAiE ITrJ1 M i. uNlT UN 17 LOST 5 AMlWN1 Con it. 1" A.C. over 4^ A. B. e720 B.F. 1.25 8,400 AO Conic. van aDie tm ckness A.C. Overlay Cdnit. 8^ curb 8 gutter LOnst. COtKrttt tlr lvtwdY apprOdCA COnit. P.L.L. 6idewa lk install Street frees Rrmpve existing R.C. Pavement AdjY$t Ndttr Yi ive [d Grade M1ust Sewer Mdnnole to Grade Street Lights (Sturm dnm along E'ty P.L. 36" R.C.P. Headwall lunct~on strut! ure w(2a^ CAP Aemov al of exi st Ong :bonne! 6]20 S. F. 1.00 8,720.00 28S l..F, 10.00 2,850.00 348 S. F, 2,80 966,00 1510 S. F. 2.40 3,626,00 it EA. 100.00 1, LOO.DO 3368 S.f. .80 2,183.00 t :A, 300,00 700,00 t Ea. 750.00 750.00 z EA. laoD.ao z,DDD.DD 70 '.F, 44.00 2,520,00 EA. 1200,00 1,200.00 I EA. 2500.00 1,500.00 '.ump Sum l.S. 800.00 800.00 $pIITOtaI 7S,9LA'vS C OY i. PUQ :ON C. :. :0 .0Y7;YGE YCv :'>'i i ', 325, d0 roc A.l9YSn'.~Lr:LY 3:,oao.co FAliNflJl °EAFCRflANCE SJRESv ,:OCt, !38,000.,19 L AeDR ANO eATEA.AL SE COR ay ,i0s) 5+4 DOD.M E RGI`iEER (AG :YSPECi:OY F.: 5 :.725.00 ^kE STOR AT;OA/DEI;YEAT;ON CASH OED08:' i C.'100.C0 (REFUYOddL E. YONU"E Y7AT:0Y SUREir iCAS•~ ala •PUrsuant to City of Rancho Lucnaonga Municipal Code, title [, CDaptcr L08, +ddp[in9 San Bernardino Courtly Code Fit les, Chapters l-6, a cash reStoNtf on /de if neafion deposit SMIi ee made prior to issuance of do Engineering Conitruttfon Perm R. .4c. 7 ~- INPROVEMENT SECURITY (NSTR UNENT • for OEV ELGPMENT REViEN Y0. d]-17 ,THIS RGAEEMEN T, as de and entered Into this day of 19 Dy and Ce[w een~~o rtgage and Re al tv Invesron Ae reindf teY relerre~ ay Len er", an andrev Ba rmrk ion hereinafter re ter ed to a5 "90rrower^, and it ~. Y N M _UCAMORGa, ', AL If ORNIA, he re inalter referred [p as "City', Drovi des as fDllD ws: 4ITXE SSETN: ANERE AS, Lender is a financial Institution subject [o regulation Dy the state of Feder at government within the meaning of California Gove*nm enL Code Se<ti on 66499(a)(3); aDd NHEA CAS, from the proceeds at a loan from Lender to Borrower, lender has pn deposit for the account D/ 8orr over, the sum of One Hundred Tht rty Teo Thousand OpiJOrs (5132 000 00) two-thirds (2/]) or wn~cn sna con st itu to and De re erre to as ^the r/E.gerformance to nd; s(and the other one-third (1/3) of which shall tonititute and De referred to as [he "Da ymfl~ fund" end e. / NHERE AS, dDrrower nos entered into an gg~ment, herein- after referred [o as "the Agreement", with the City whereby Borrower, agrees Co install and complete certain designated OuClic fmDrove menu , whicA said Agreement dated 19 and identified as relerr inq to Proj ec[ O~A3=TT is AereCy referred to and maEe a pert hereof. NON, THER EP OR E, in cpnsiderat ion of the City gf ving • final approval tD Me Pro]e<t known ez0evelD menC Ravi ew No. d]-17 and dutnDri ting the r<cD rd atipn of any tract Dr parce map Detaining [hereto, Lender and 8orrpwer agrees: 1. Tne performance fund I5 security pledged tD the City to insure that 9orr owes, Its heirs, successors, execu [ors and administrators, shall in all to logs it and to and abide oy, and will and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and p r'ov icons Df [Act agreement and any alteration thereof made as CAere in provided, on Borrower's part tD 0¢ kept and perfdrm ed acme time and in the manner [he•ein specif ie0 and in all respects according tD its true and iaw(ul meaning, and tD insure that 90r rD w¢r, i[t netr5, SVCCe Sfars, eaeCU:D rs and administr aCDrs, shall I`y and sav¢ harmless Cfty, itz o tfice rs, agents and empl>yees as stipu:ated in the Agreement. 2. Lender sh a'1 dl sCD rse the Der larm ante fund to ene Cfty in Such amounts as too Ci ;y Conan ds, promptly upon receipt 01 written oemanES signed Cy the Ci[y Engineer of the City, and s pecffytng therein ;h a[ do mower Is in default under the Agree- ment or this Agreement. 3. In the event City co^^ie nces legal acifan to recover all Or any oo reign of tAe Der Porrance fund, to en ;he City shall D< entitled tp recover, in adE:;ion to the amount of the perfor- mance fund, costs and red SanaD le esDenseT and fees, inc lading reasanaCie dtC prn¢y'S fees. 4. Lender and dory over agree Mat the payment fund fs security Dle ged for the payment D/ all contractors, supc pntrd<tors, la Corers, mater aimen and p Mer persons employed in the Derlor mance DF Me agreement and who ere re/erred to in title li fcpmmenc in9 with Sectlan 30921 of Part 4 of Oivf lion J of the butt, Cade of the State of California for mater talc • furnished or IdpOf performed of any Mind, ar amounts due under [h¢ Unemp lOyment In to rdnte Ac[ witA resp et[ to such wprk or G,~ /~~l actor, and to at Lender will pay the same,Vn an amount not exceed- ~~ / ing the payment fund, anO in case tune ~s Dra u'ght will pay, in c~ss,dyJ ~~ -1. .. 7 OEVELOpMENT REVIE'd N0. 87-17 a dd iti0n to the Daym<nt funs, costs and reasonaEte expenses and tees, including attorney's fees. 5. This Pg reem<nt and the payment funtl shall insure to the henef ft of any antl all oersDns, CO mp an+es and carDar ations eats tleo to file Cld ims under Title 15 ;cpmmencin? with Sec(i on 3092) of Part 6 of Oiv islon 7 Of tree Civil Code, so as to give a r +gnc of action co them Dr :he+r assigns in any suit Drought upon this Agreement or against the Oaym en[ Iu red. 6. No ch an g<, <xt ension of time, alteration or addition t0 the terms of tree Agreement Or to tree work to he perform e0 tnereundv or the Spec+ficat ions act Dmpanying [he same shall in any wise affect this Agreement or Lender and Borrower's ooliga- t+OnS by eund er, end they a0 nere0y waive notice o/ any Such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the ter mg pf tree Agr<tmtnt Or t0 the work or to tree iDeci l+cati0p, This Agreement shall Oecome effective upon ac <eptance oy tree City and shall remain in foil force and effect until such t+me as the City shall release the Derf Ormanct /u red and payment fund as hereinafter provioetl. IN MITNESi wNEREOF, Lender and 9or rower nave execu te0 th+s Agreement on the day and year first above wrf [ten. LENOEP: ptdB MORTGAGE ANO REALTY INVESTORS A n+a rylan= Real 0/~s/e aee save 9tment T: use ~v4Y»CNVL •1:Dtt, ?LE 91dERG _BOR r 1(pl o r i+ae Tree City Of Rancho Luc dm Ong d, Califon +a, he•t0y acceD is ine fo rego+n9 Imoravement Se rar+ty :nst•arent ono dgrees: 1. Upon final U^~o :'_t'P and a[Ce02 do CQ Of the reRU+r?d work, antl [he pert orm ante of all acts sDec+f +e0 in [he Agre@ment, I Ci [y wiil re le dso any Dart of tree ce•' •ran ce fund not cla+neo Dy [he City in accordance w+tn tree peDVey Drovis+ans, not needed as recur+ty Deemed necessary Oy ire C+ty for an ` guarantee Or warranty per +od or not need?0 as secure ty or costs ono rear on axle expenses ono fees of tree City, inciuotng re asonaole aft orney~s fees. 2. Six (61 mantas after the ca'nplet+on and acceptance of the reT++red worts, C'~tY w+~l r=ye are the Dayment fund eeceDt SuCn Odrt tnorepf d5 e~~a'.5 ~.a a 11 0/ dll C13tTt On an+Cn d0 ac t+on nos Deere fled and no:+ce ':ne.ao/ g+ven M wr+t+ng to the C~[y CoUnc+l of tree Ci cy. CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMOMOA, a more+c+p al cprpordn an ty; ATT ES ~: sty L erk L~~ •2. rrTV nc n evrun rt~renrtnvr_e STAFF REPORT -~~y ~V' ~i~~:. Y'~~~~7 i~ 1 197; ~ • DATE: April 4, 1984 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Aooroval of Bonds and agreement far D.R. 83-18 located on the east side of Archibald avenue at 7th Street submitted 6y Martin Oaska, ?nc. The attached resolution is for the approval of an agreement to guarantee the construction of sidewalk along Archibald Avenue for the Scheu Industrial Park. The requirement to install sidewalk as made as a condition of approval for the proposed building construction at the subject location. The bonds submitted by Martin ,]asks, inc. are in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 53,800.00 Labor and Material Bond: 51,900.00 RECOMMEROgTION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same on behalf of the City. 0.espGc [fully submy~ted, ~~~~, LiH: ~:jaa ~ Attachments q ~~~~ ,~ 5 51T3 !2 ~a .1^ f' ~ .~ °~ ~~ }, °~ ~ __ im r; ue~.~ ~..~... » _13 OF RANCHO ENGINEERING D1~'ISION VICINITY MAP ~I~ r :~ i .--- . _ - ~,. - ,. i s >~e .. ~,. .1.5 I N page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDN6A IMPROVEMENT A6REEM ENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REYI EY AO-15 ANON ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the Drovin oni of Cne Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cuc am ~~ge, State of Caltt ornia, a manic iD+I cor p9ratipn, hereinaR er referr- ed t~~.,~{~ th(vA Ci Dy and between said City and 'j'L hereinafter relerred to as the eve ap er, uazcin J. Jaska, :n c. THAT, YNE0.E A5, said Develop lr desires Co develop carte in reel DroDerCy in said City lpm [ed on the east side of Ar chiDa ld Avenue at 7th Street; and NXEREAS, said City haz esta Dli:had Certain re9uirements to De met Dy said Developer as Drlre9ui site to granting 01 final approval; and YNERE AS, the execution o/ this agreement and posting o1 improvement security as here ina/tar cited, and apDrov ed Dy the City Attorney, are deemed to De e9uivalent to Dr for completion of safd re9uirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NON, iNE0.EF OR E, it ti hereoy agreed Dy and De Meen the [icy and the Developer as foe la ws: • I, the bevel oDer hereoy agrees to canstr ucC et devel9per~s expense all improvements descr iD ea an page A her eel within 12 months tram the date hereof. 2. iM s agreement shall De eH active on the date of the res9lutton of the C9unctl 01 said City approving N is agreement. This dg dement shall De in default on me ddy follow- ing the /irsC anniversary date of said aDP rov el unless an e.[en- zfon of time has Deere granted Dy said City ai Nereinalter provid- ed. 3. the Developer may re flues[ adds Clones time to ehicn to complete the provin ohs of [his agreement, in wri ring not Less than 3D days prior to [he de/cult date, and including a ste Le men[ Of <If CYm stdn Llf Of neCe 551ty 1if dddl;l Ondl t1me. In LOnatdO~d- tion o/ such re9vest, the City reserves the right to rev taw the provisions hereof, including canstr action standards, cost estimate, and su /f iciency p1 the improvement secure ay, area :o fe9U1 r! ddf VSLmentS tllE rote enpn edrr dnCed Dy suDS.dntldl Ch an j25 therein, A. II the Developer faits or neglects [o comply with the pr ovist ohs Of this agreement, the aty shall have Me rigor at any time to cause sat0 pf9Vtal0ps to Oe completed Dy any 1aw- fut means, and thereupon tp recover from sate Developer ono/ar his Surely the fall cost and expense :ncurr ed to so doing. S. Can str action perotts shall De OOt aimed Oy the Devel- oper tram the office df Che Ct tY Engineer prior tp start of any work wttnin [he Op01tc right-of-nay, and the devela0 er shell C OnduCt such wort In lull LOmpltdnc! with the reguldCi0n1 coot atned thereto. Non-compliance may result in st opptng o/ the work Dy the C7 ty, and ass esf man[ 0/ the penal[tes provide d, • 6. Public rigs t-ol-way tmprOVeme nt worM repaired Ln all De constructed in LOntormence with approved Improvement plans, Standard Spectf lc atloni, and Standard Orawtngs and any sp atlas am endm<n is Mere to. Constru<tlon shall Inc ludo any transi tt ohs end/dr other incident el work deemed necessary Por dralnege ar ~~~ ~~ public safety, Err on or Ommissi0ns Oisc overed during construc- tion shall be corrected upon [he Direction of th< City Engineer. Nevi se0 work due Lo said Dl an mod if stations shall De covere0 Dy the DfDY fsions of this agreem ent and secured Dy [he surety covering the origi na) planne0 works. 1, 4ork none within existing streets snail De 011 igenL ly pureutd to comp let lan; the City shall have [Ae right t0 complete any and ail work in cne event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover alt cost and ex0ense Incurred /rom roe OevllOp er and/Or his c<n Vac for Dy any idwf ul means. B. Tne De veloD!r shad be responsia le /or replacement, rllOCations, or removal Of any component of any irrfgatlon water ryi tam in conflict with the repot red work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and ine owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be rasp anti Dle for remOV al Of all loose rock and Diner deans from the public right-o/-way, ID. the Developer shalt plant and maintain parkway trees as directed Oy cne Commons ty Dev<IOpmenL Director. 11. ine impr OV event security to Oe fu rnlihed by the Develop<r t0 guarenL ee completion of the terms o/ this agreem ant shall De suaj act t0 tAe approval of [he C1ty NtLOrney. TA! prin- cipal amount of said impr ov<m ant secure ty shall not be leis than cne amount sn own: • ~~ FAITNFUL PEgi0R11AN[E Type: Prlncfpal amount: 53,000.00 Name and address at surety: MATERIAL RND LABOR type: Pr inciDal Amaun t: 51,900.00 Name and address o/ surety: GSN DEPOSIT NONUNENTAT IOR iy pe: Prfncipal Amount: -0- Name and address o1 surety: TO RE PO STEO PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BT THE CITY IN NIT NESS HEREOF, the Darti es eereto Aav! caused [kese Dret ants to !e duly esecuted and acknoeledge eitN all /orma Uties re qufred Dy tae on t tes set }orN o0posite tAl tr signatures. Date i,-1^, -'1 `} Oy • Develop er igna ra Roger !. Jaaka, President Mar[Sn J. Jaaka, Inc. n nt! • I Oate oy Oe velop er ign store Accl plea: City of Rancho Cacanonga, California A Municipal Co rporat~on 9y: Mayor Ap prov ld: ~ . ~ ily Attorney UE YELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST gE NOTARIZED J 3 ~ ~~ CITT OF gAlICMO CUCPMON6A • COiISTRUCTION ESTIIUTE ENCg0ACN1EMT PERMIT FEE SCNEWLE For ImprovemenC of: Archibald Avenue at 7N S[reet Date: 12/fi/B3 onpute y: ann erttn Tile qe erende: 6A-RT1S-City D.9• No. MOTE; Bees not include arramt Ire /a RIt 1119 Darnit W paYntett deppSi ts. CONSTgULiiON COST ESTIMATE ITEM U M DnIT UNIT COST f PNOU9T D.C.[. Curb - l2" C.F. D.C.C. Curb - B" [.F. D.C.C. Curti aniY 6' C. i. A.C. Berm (5200 min.) q" D.L.C. fi0eeatk 1610 S.f. 52.00 f3, 210,00 6' Driv< ApDraacn 8' D.L.C. Cress GutCer Street Exuvat ion 79 Yard 53.00 f 225.00 Crushed Aggregate Base (per in. [nick) A.[. (over 1300 tonal a.C. (900 to 1300 tans) A.C. (under 500 to 900 tons) A.C. (under 500 tonal Patch A.C. (trench) 1' tntck q.C, Overlay • Adju s[ sorer manhole to grade pd]ust saver clean cut to grade gdju st rater valves w grace Strew[ Ltgnts Street Signs Street Trees Parkway Landscape and ;rrigation CO45TAUCTION COST S3 A65.00 CONTi NGE NCY CO5'f f 366.W TOTAL CON STR L'Ci;ON 5:.799.00 FAITHFUL PEAF00.NANCE Soo ETY (100X1 53,900.00 LABOq ANO MgTEA iAL SEC9A1'Y (50X) 51.900.00 ENG,N EER LYG IN Si EC 7;ON FEE S 172,25 •RES?]AA?:0H/OELINEA?SON '4 SH 9E n0 S:T -0- ,gEPoNOABlE1 MONUME9T AT SOH SU AEiY ;GASH; -0- aPUrsuant to CI[Y o! Rancho CucamM9a Municipal Cade, 71t 1e I, LTapter LOO, adopt in9 S+n &rnardlm County [ode Tit lea, CAapters 1-5, a cash restoration/delineation depot it shall De node Drior to iSSUance of an En9lneerfng Construction Penai t. -a. ~ ~7 RESOLUTION NO _D4-BF_$TCR j if~- 7c~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEH 83-18 'dHEREAS, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on Fehruary 29, 1984, by Martin Jaska, Inc. as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Archibald gvenue at 7th Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms [hereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review 83-15; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said • Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1984. AYES: LADES: ABSENT: on ice s, , ayor ATTEST: Lauren .Wasserman, .i y er jaa 1~7 • L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 4, 1984 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer 1971 f SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement and Security and Agreement for Sapphire Street Improvements for CUP 83-04 located on the west side of Sapphire south of Banyan Street submitted by The Alta Loma Christian Church The attached resolution is for the approval of two agreements. One is an Improvement Agreement for public street improvement and the other is a City participation agreement for reconstruction of the existing street. This will provide the City with a street section that retains more storm flows on the west side Of the street than presently exists. The security offered is a passbook on file in the City Treasurer's office. RECOMEMDATiON It i5 recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the two agreements and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same on behalf of the City. Respectfully submit ed, ~iiv'' f~~=~/O"W// " / LBH^. M:taa Attachments ~ ~`~NONc 9 ~" Y. 1. < ~~~ _, 1',v - ~ qA 'Z .~ 7 ~~ - --~arw~--: -,~ , ;l , ,,.~ ~: ~~, ,: , ;~,. \~~ ^ ~'/~ I \~ % ~ ~ ~ '-~G1' i r ~ ,E~ {~i ~` J--^~% . Vii. ~~ w` . 7~d1! ~~ ~~_ ' ..• 1 ~ '' ~'~.r.:BiCJ e/93.4 ~ 6 K. ~. rIIM1~' \~\~ , , \ ~. ` ~\. n ' ~ ~. ~ • _ • JOt' ~ ~1 ~ ~ rv1 ~~ ~~ :. --- - ,.~ _. .,_ ~ `~ ~ _ .. _ rr~ !_~`J . .__ _~ L __ .,.,..~...~.~..~..,..,..~..,... ... ~ .•i ~: ffl'ay..,,x..va~Prv~iW/1. i It r r» J , ~:-~..~, t-- ~ ~ : , ~°, ~ ~r-~~1"-+ Win. ,., ~.; a~ ,~~•~ . ~ r!`w;~:.; ~i-t,<':-tit a.... TP.{'C7 c°ao ~.rsrr~c~ ~ i-fu-., L. (.~J •_~J'.'~-~„1_.~...-may , ~^i .. i~ 1 ,. `.~ ~. it - - NG Jl. i ;, ;,d°>`'~~~~~'~~, CITY OF RANCHO Cl.'GV110NGA cicle; ~ ~ . ~ 4P83• ~ I '~' ENGINEER . i `- ~.' ING DIVISION VICINITY h1AP - ~ r I L - Page • • AGREEMENT FOR SAPPHIRE STREET IMPROVEMENTS [N CONJUNCTION MJTN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-04 This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 198 by and between ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH, Developer, and THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~+IONGA, a municipal corporation, City. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City and Developer desire to mutually participate in the construction of Sapphire Street Improvements between Orange Street and Banyon Street; and . 'dHEREAS, the Developer has expressed its willingness to include said • construction with improvements for Conditional Use Permit 83-04. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED RS FOLLOWS: 1. The Developer shall contract for the construction of Sapphire Street between Orange Street and Banyon Street, said improvements as further described in City of Rancho Cucamonga Drawing No. 854. 2. The City agrees to share in the cost of improvements for the west half of Sapphire Street from Station 8+30 to Station 10+41.68 as shown on said Drawing No. 854 in the quantities described in the attached Exhibit "R", Total amount being a lump sum of $9,427,50. 3, The developer shall coordinate with affected utility companies for the relocation of the service pole and the water meter within Che City's portion of the work. • -1- ~a 4. The City agrees to pay funds to the Oeveloper in the amount of • said share within thirty (3D) days of completion and acceptance by the City. 5. Each party shal•1 indemnify the other parties and its officers, agents and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts of omissions on its part or on the part of its officers, agents, contractors and employees in connection with the construction. 6. This Agreement may only 6e changed with the mutual consent of the parties in the form of written contract amendments. 7. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein are all subject to a successful completion of constructon of fmprovements. IH WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as the date first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONDA, a municipal corporation by von D. Mt a s, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City C~erk APPROVED AS TO FORM: i ' - City ttorn` 2- ~3 ALTA COMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH, Developer by =~4; State of Cali~ornia Ccunty m' San 6erna rCino jSS Subs~'ribed ant swan to berme roe, the undersigned I:otary Public, l7y eJGci!E L. SERL, SOICiy, this 15th day o. Fla rch, 1Su~i. YaLI'ic1L $htrley~-~'~'`~`"S I~OLd'ry PUl)i IC «~, 1nKW Yl pATRICI~ 9MIRLEY ~~.w~+~ yw ateu~ovacounrv CoTnow6w u~ 1a. 19M • • • "c XHI3IT A A. Remove 3,812 s.f. of A/C @ 35¢ PSF 1,355,20 B. Remove 102 l.f, of L/G @ 52.95 l.f. 300,90 C, Remove 468 s.f, of sidewalk @ 75¢ PSF 351.00 D. Remove one driveway approach @ 5320 each 320.00 E. Remove and reinstall mailboxes (2) @ 525 each 50,00 F. Construct 3" A/C over 4" base, 4,280 s.f. @ 90¢ PSF 3,852.00 G. Construct 8" C/G per Std. 303, 170 l,f. @ b7 PLF 1,190,00 H. Construct 6' wide sidewalk per Std, 310, 732 s.f. @ 51,40 PSF 1,024.80 I. Construct 6" drive approach per Std. 305, 288 s.f. @ 52.20 PSF 633.60 J. Adjust manhole to grade, 2 @ 5175 each 350.00 K, Adjust water valves to grade 0 @ 565 each 0 ~. Any grading or subarad ing to conform with soils report included Exclusions A, Restriping off public street B. Adjusting street lights or wat~:r meters to grade ^JTAL 59,427.50 n :y C~ CITY OF RPN[MO CULAMONGA IN PR OVEMERT AG0.E EMENT LUP 83-Od KN08 ALL NEN RY T4ESE pRE3ENT 5: That tnii agreement is mane and entered iota, in conformance with the provisions of the Yunlctp al :ode and Regulat+ons of the City of Ran<hp Cucamonga, State pf Cal ifprn+e, a mun xlp al corporation, here+nafter referr- ed to ai the City, oY and between said Ci[Y one ,L. Herein a/[er referred to as the eve aper. iR AT, YHEREAS, said Developer desires to aevetop certain real pr o0erty in idid Lity :pc at ed on the west side of SaDph ire, soutn Of Banyan Street; and 11N ER EAS, said City Has established ter tafn regu iremenii tD oe met by sate Devel oD er as prerequis+te to gr doting a/ /final aper pV dl; and NHE0.EAS, the ewecutipn of [his agreement and pasting pf improvement security ai hire inafter cited, and approved by [he City At Carne y, are deeme0 to be equivalent [o Drior completion of sa+d requ+rements for the purpose of securing sate approval. NO'A, TH ER r. FORE, it is hereby agreed by anO be [ween the City and the Oevelpper as (ol laws: 1. Tne Developer Hereby agrees to construct at deve lcper~s eap an se all im0rovem en ti described on edge 4 hereof w+;h+n 12 months from the date nerepf. • 2, This agreement sh d17 De effective on the Bate of the resolution of the Caunctl of sa+d Ci[y approv+ng tH .S agreement. Tnis agraem ent snail be in default an the Jay follpw- ing the I+rst ann rrersary fate of said approval anless an ekten- sion of t+me has oven granted Hy sa+d Lity as nereinaiter DfOV+d- ea. 3, the Deve'op=• may regse st edd+::onal t+me in vn~~ch m complete the pnvls•c^s q` to :; aqr Bement, +n writing not Less than 30 days prior tp zf ~~lt da:z, and +nclud+ng a state men; of c+R Umitantes pf rec^ts ~:y `pr adf';l pn al time. :n <Dnsldera- [IUn Of SUCK fep.ei:, :/ r±SEf vet :he fljnt en re'llex :ne pray isions Hereof, 'np cpnstr JC:~, pn st acd eras, cps: estimate, ana sul`IC ~eaCy lof [ne +m or pvement security, ono ;D require adJ usfinents [Hero a xnzn ., err anted py sup s:an[+al changzs tnereln, a, If the Develcper falls or neglects to cpmp!y xiM the pr ov+si ons pl th+s ogre=men:, twe Clty snail Have the rigor at any time to ca~ie sa+d ;rov:s'ons tp be comDle[e0 by any law- ful means, and tHereupan [p recover Ir ;* said Develop er ana/or his Su reey the fJll cost and expense +ncgrrea +n sp da log, i. LOnstruc:t on perm+ti shat' be obt a+ned by the oevel- pper f•pm the office of the :~. ty Enq ~reer prior to star: of any xprk xlthin LHe public •Igh G pl-way, ana the developer Sndl cpnduc: sack worw In 'all corlpll ante x+tn the re galatlDns contained the •e'n. Van-rp-,p Ilan ca nay •esvlt :n stOpp+ng pf Cne xork by the Clty, and as szss rent pf ;ne Dendl[loi provlied. 6, pvollc r:qh :-pf-way ~rprpv ement work repui rod shall Ce Cp nstrUt t2p In <Jn (pfT do Ce Illn JbprpvEe improvement pin S, Standard Spec if rtat ion s, and Standard Drax+n gs end any spec+al amendments theretD. Cons[r uct len snail Include any tr envtipns and/or otHer incident al work deemed necessary for dr a+na9e or public sale ty. Errors or ommi si Ions d+scovered dun ng cpnstruc- ~ ~ ti on ih all be cprrec Led upon the dlreclion pf the Ci[y Engineer. Rev ~s ed work tlue to Said plan mo0lficati ohs shall be covered by the pr ov~sions of this agreement and se ca red by the surety covering the pri ginal planned works. 7. Nark done wi [h in ev~sting st reed shall be diligent- ly pursued to com0le[i on; the City shall have the ri got to Complete any and all work in [he even[ of enjust if ied delay in comolet ion, and to recover all cost and eaD ense Incurred from the Developer and/or his contractor by any Lawful means. 8. The Oereloper shall b< resppnsib le far replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of any ern gation water sys:em in conflict with the reouired work to the iatisf action Of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible fbr removal p` all loos< rock ono other debris from the public right-0l-way. l0. The Developer snail plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by [ne CammunitY Development Oir«tor. ll, the improvement security [o be furnished by the O eveloper to guarantee <ompletipn of [he terms of this agreement mall be subj act to the approval of th< City Rttorne y. Tne pnn- <iDal amount of said improvement security shall hat Oe less Loan the amount shown: f~a. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Pn nc ;pal Amount 169,000.90 Nacre Snd a00re55 Of surety: NAT ER UL ANO 1A800. TYP e: Pn nciPal AmOUnt: 32<,SD0.00 flame and aaa re ss of surety: CA SM DEPOSIT NON UNENTATION TYpe° Princfpal Amount: Name anc atleress Pf surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BT THE CITY IN wITNE SS MEAEOF, [h< parties hereto have caused [nese presents to De 7u ly e+ecu L^tl antl acknawle0ge wfM all formalities reguir<0 Dy law an [he Uates se[ f0 rth ppOSite tDe;r signatures. Date'yl7G...1 IS./9d10 y1 OevelPPer aig~a to re Eu 4cuf t~ 5'2L Jr;ntec Jdte Dy :gn at.re Developer • Accepte 0: C,ty O£ Rancho C;c anion ge, Calif cr,:a A Municipal Cpr pOr i[;cn 9Y: attest M aYOr ApprOVetl: - _Ity Aleorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES NUSi BE NOTARIZED J:a LY. ~:i kill Cf11id CTrn LY Jf Sdn ,)2fndf tlln0i $_ SuDSC r, Cec aM ;worn !P Defare ^e, [D¢ uncers; ;net :;e Lary PODIIC. Dy E.;a,E • L. $ERL. solely. 4nts IS.D cdy Lf i-~d rc D, IbnS. ~- M1AtClp BHaN~a• ~G.~.Y. ~.~..~ ~\. , ~ (~. „ saw w•r~u wo~cawn Pa Vlc la SDI rI eY. NO [d r-y i^u01-is~lyl lxnn in Il. Nlt c ~ y~ • cm OF Ruicx0 cucA9rmcii CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE ENCROaCHLENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE DEVELOPER PORTION For improvement of: Sapphi r! zoutn of 3anyen Oa [e: 3/7/d4 tcmpu[~3y: -Sn rota 3ose - - File Re erenc~ e: :~P~33-J~:i tY 0~9~ Nom NOTE: Ibet 1100 iM IYd! CYrrMt (K (Or writing peratt ar pavtvent deposits. C084RU CT IOV COST EST CNATE :TY 1y' Y iY 'JN IT UNIT '.OSi S AMOU.'IT 0.emave esis[t ng trees :amp Sum L.S. 2, 100.00 2,500.70 Remove exl sling A. C 6,578 S.F. 0.35 2,302.10 fletocate exlstl n9 f.H. I EA, 350.00 350.00 Relocate existing street sfgn I EA. 200.00 200.00 Cons[ruct 8' c ro 6 9u [ter 59B L.F. 6.00 1,508.00 Wnstr~ct 6' of de sl deweik 3,328 S. F. 1.75 5,924.00 Cans:ruct 76' driveway 925 S. F. 2.50 2,065.50 Compact su6.6ase 11,960 S.F. O. IS 1,794.00 C ohs [rust 3" A. d. 11,960 S.F. 0.24 2,870.30 Construct 3' A. B. 11,960 S. F. 0.55 6,578,00 Ada ust sever manna 7! t0 grade L EA. 250.00 250.00 Ins[ati street Ilgh[ l EA. 1 ,000.00 3 Oi_.00 CITY SUB tOTAL 31,319.20 • DEVELOPER SUB TOTAL 13,335. ]fi C7:ISTRUCT:08 COST 544.654. 96 COY7; NGEtICY COSTS S 4,165. 50 TOi AL CONSTUCTION 549,120. :6 fAl iHfUL fERPod4ANCE S'JRET'! ', :07:) 949.DC0. 00 LABOR n:,D '~d i E3 [:'.. '__LP;rY 5^, :1 124.9,0. 00 . ,e„iE ER 7F :'.Sfr G;CI F,. 1 1,53a. 70 •AESiORAT [08pE. LYEAT G:A CASN ;;?OS^. _ 5:?9. :0 'i REf P,7 AdL E; YON'JYENi AT 10;1 5'IAE i'I CASH) V/A •Pursuant to City 4( Rantho Cucamonga Nan is tool Code, Title I, CCAapter 1.08, adopt ln9 San Bernardi no County Code titles, Chapters i-5, a casA restprrttan/del meat ion deposi[ thail he made prior to Issuance o/ an En9i neM tog Construction Perwit. a-a ~~ ~ ~ CITY OF RAIICNO NCMNINOA • LONSTRULTTON ESTIMATE FXCRORLHMENT PERMIT fEE $CNEOULE CITY PORTION For ;nOrovement of: _ Sapppire, sou[n of 3anyan Oate: 3/7/24 - Campu:xa Dy: $m n[u Dose File R¢ erenc-7 e: TT3T-~ =f [Y 0.9• Np. oD NOTE: Daea not [M IuDe cpr rMl fee fOr .r itltq per>tit a pareNdst deposits. CON STAUCTION COST r. S TIMATE ITE?1 U rv , „NIT L'N:' C75T 5 ANO'JYi Remove edicts ng 0..C. 3.640 S.F. 0.75 1,271.^0 Remove es~s:in9 curo 6 qu[ter lOl L.f. 3.70 733.30 Remove esi its ng zide.alk 44B S. F. t. CO 448.00 Ror~OVe am replace drtvesay 27fi $. F. 1.00 276.00 Rempv¢ antl replace moil Daa 2 EA. 100.00 200.00 0.e lOCate poser pole I Fd. 3,000,00 3,000.W Como act zuD-base 4,234 $. F. 0.15 675.10 Construct B' A. B. 4,274 S.f. 0.24 I,O16. 1fi Construct 3' A.C. 4,274 S.F. 0,55 2,328.70 Cons tr ucl curb a gutter 1fi7 L.F. 6.00 1, OOZ.00 Construct 6' sidesalk 690 S.F, 1.15 1,207.50 Construct artvesay 472 S. F, 2.50 1,180.00 Adjust serer manhole to groat I Ed. 250.00 250.00 Adjust cater valves [o grade 7 ER. 75.00 225.00 CITY SUB TOTAL 13,375.76 • CONSTAUCTICN CC ST iSEE OEVEL OPE0. POA i'C4) CONi [NGEeCY rO STS TOTAL CONSTRUCT:CN FAITNF UL REBFOftMgNCE SURETY (:005i LAAOR ANO MATERIAL $ECU0.iTY (5751 EYGiVEER :'IG IVSP ECT:CV FE. •RESTOAAi;OY /OE'. [VEdia~ CAStl OEf OS:T ;REF:90A,,.., MO'IOMEYi dTiON SURETY (CA$-; •PUrsuant to [Ity of Rancno CutaNOnga Nunfcipal Cptle, title I, Chapter 1.08, adapting $M Bernard ino County Cpoe titles, Chapters I-5, a cash restoration/Delineattan Deposit shall 0e made prior to issuance of an Engineering Cons tructlM Permit. S.A • ~y r-- • urpgNlNG: This accounr is being asslnned to Rancho Cucamonga to assure payment of off site improvements with reference to construction at the Alta Lana Christian Ch~irch. Upon completion total contract pr ice of Improvements is to be paid from this account and any balance is to be trans[er red back to the Alta Loma Christ lan Church. (10L0'CtJ171FlCA7l. ~ - 'ACCCYM NuNaa ~-S022b~1 ~ .oaten Maf CA t5:'. t.l~lYl~•=f~~_ -1~.. 111(1 CNWCN YYlO~flAlf [VN/f INC. ~. ~~_;••'i~':. .. LnMp lib OA+otw of CInYt etA fl.MMnCWMr e1 SaioM~il`Gili~rr~: - - ' • ~ -A NOMe1t0f1T WJf011WA.Cd1/OIIATIOtF• =~_ ~ ~-..=_- . Abni~I1n11A ONfM: Ta~wo~ LlNgnw .=~ ~=~ ~.-~ _ ..... TMr~~~C,~t, y,. of Rancho Cucartlon,~a,,,(Se,q;,iyalrti~ng) ila1N ~ Goq Cmifkne a rat ~momn Neon as qe nferd indW ~, fMfq e W MitlY of LNafOOtifa ~!Y•lan o/ IEe amtta Dwtloeaai lat. lal. q a vKb fq lee que~w of RoPUt. seen of alord 4io10~ w0 oq~ ~W w p ,- tS~ueas of cTriu W Otwlu Qgclq u CJifania - OMeO'IkYtlopnml ~W, bG V W m AY NiRYI w ilN ms ~A hrW.r - tM nq at fAtolR Oe aqs. W q10-1111Yat1 dYl M Mi6 .. , - mgrtehonNe)lY Oq of MUm, qe Jp00q oflm<ro05Mmleage)IU AY of prmily .ra Yqf. SW ienua Wtggl vYY ee wd M uW .gmmlb a . r `~ ~G m RESOLUTION N0. SI6.0.68Eii ~y -~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-04 AND AN AGREEMENT FOR SAPPHIRE STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 19, 1984, Dy The Alta Loma Christian Church as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to [he real property spec if ically described therein, and generally located on the west side of SapDh ire, south of Banyan Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in saitl Improvement Agreement and Subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 83-04; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Rgreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is fdentif ied in said Improvement Agreement; and WHEREAS, the inst allat ian of certain supplemental improvements are • necessary for public, health and safety and the developer has provided the City with an agreement for City participation in construction of Said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED Dy the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Agreement for Sapphire Street Improvements and Improvement Security 6e and the same are hereby approved and [he Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk [o attest thereto, PASSED, APPROYEO, and ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1984. qY ES: NOES: ABSENT: RTTEST: • Lauren M, Wasserman, ty er jaa on ~ i e s, Mayor ~~ my nn n• STAFF REPORT ~~'`~ ~'~~`' r ~~~, Y~~ ~.~ > ~ IJ DATE: April 4, 1984 i5,~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: 3arbara Kroll, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement submitted by H. Y, Natt for Tract 10045 located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north side of Hi115 ide Channel Mr, Hing ~Aatt, developer of Tract 10045, has submitted an Improvement Extension Agreement to request a one-year extension for the construction of off-site improvements. 9onds in the following amounts are on file in the City Clerk's office: faithful Performance Bond: 582,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: E41,000.00 l J RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Improvement Extension Rgreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. /ReSD~ectfully subai[t ed, lY '~ LBH: :jaa Attachments /~ olrr ~i~r/rs .-~~ ^ ~goTECT s i rE • k t ~ i •' `~~""~~'' CITY OF RANCHO CC:CA~IO` ~~/ ~ Y ~f ~ln ENC:INEERI\G DIVISION v-clNrrv nt,~r s3 tiUr., iA ~ ~8 N .. Page ~ ~ Y +:att 1^,•~;erlock ::ill ?d. 2~'<?~°4 'anc'ro 1'acarcr"ea ~ ., , ~ ~ year :s. '"rail '_.^,c'o~=d r!=ase `ind three copies c` '".e .mproveme rt ' ~, V~ =.x torsion aareerent for tract 'OC4s and a check for ?251,00. "F.e reason for the extensio^. is as `olicws: due to urfavorab le mar~et co^dition and the related :`narcial rrofection, ~.ve are unable to start the improve- ^.en± in the ti^:e frame recuired. Sut we do plan to work on t.`.e improvement in this comine twelve months and discharee our oolieations. :Lease prcc ess this anrlicaticn for extension. :: you • rewire ang furthur intonation, please call me at the aoove rum:oe r. Sincerely yours, :'.ir,~ 'i. 'nartt ~y CITY OF MNCNO CUCAMDNGA • INP0.0YE11ERT EI{TENSIpI AGREEMENT fqt TMCT IOD/s RNDM ALL MEN BY THESE PA ESE NTS: That loin agreement ti made and enterM iota, in cant ormance vitn [he proYistpni of the SuDdivtsi on Mao Act of the City of Ran coo Luc monga, California, a mun .<toal torpor etion, Dy and De WlM the seid .I[y~ hlrllndY tlr rlf lrYld LO d5 Ne Elty, dntl H. Y. NdCL ra llrrtd Co a5 th! Oev el open. MITNESSFTH: .HAT, 'NxEREAG sold Developer entered into an improvement agrement with the City as a reODU iCe to nnuance of Duiltlings permits, and ': HEREAS, sate Developer desires an eatenstdn a/ time to complete the terms of [ne sold Improvement agreement. YOM, iHEREF00.E, it is nerehy agreed Dy the Cicy and Dy said Developer as fOllpMS: I. Th! [Blip lltlon ddt! Of Ch! terms Of [h! Sdid 1NprpYlmM[ dOrll1111n[ i3 hereby eaten Bed fred tee date oI eap nation of the said agreement to Feoruary 2, 1985. 2. Increase in improvement stturif ie5 to reflect anent improvemMt casts shall M furntshed Dy the developer aiM this agreenent and shall De approved Dy the City Attorney. 3. Toe repo irld Dared and [he addt [tonal pre nctpal mounts thereof are Set for;n on the aetacned sneer. d, qll otner tears and condi ;i onz df the said Improvement agreement shelf • remain the same. As lvt Bence of underitantlmg the prpvisi cos c:n[sl reed Hereto, and a1 mtem m pmp:y eith same, the Developer Has supm rttea the d<lov destn Ded °Aroveme+t secure tv, and Has aN laed HIS stonature Hereto: FAITHFUL PERFOAXANCE BOND Oescrip: ron: Bp red Aadl :;pool ~r •sroal ;aou v: '.GAE Surety: lndemm ty Cd, d a'if ar n:a Address: 820 H. Parton St., Sacra Ana, Cr 9i;f: NATERI AI AND LABgI BONG Oezc rh ptlon: Same as weave Ae,i :•,pr at ?~~rr,ne' :-,aunt: ,,, ,, Surety: Address: GSH DEPOSIT MONUMENT ING DGNO Add rttpnai Cash Depo; Y.: V/A MAINTEfMNCE GUARANTEE 80110 "> oe dps:ed onv to areptdree o' cue dr:Ipe. ey the C~v. ............................................................................. ~ '~ :lu ~CRF CF PAYCHO JJGdrDYOA F.OPEA Gv~FOA:C A, t mumcip al co~oorar pre - ~ ~t MGR ".019Aa dr. ~ L,t"~~ l.___..___ „dn ^, ~ce n, vayur i A LteK: [Buren Ad;flrmdn, fly l erk ~` r ` ' NOTE: OEYELOPEp'S SIGIMTURF MIST BF NOTMILED n~ _ „ _ _ It.l ~_ (, - • ~ as OF aAl:cuD wcromxcA COSSTRUCTION A\9 CW:D ESTIriVE E9CWACICEN[ PER9 LT FEE SCCEDCLE (Attach to "Inspceter's Cepj') GATE: SM I:^~^!^ !O0+ ~ YER4IT N0. CO:~GLEO 3T -C-6 Erte, Ftle Reference 'nna5 Cf[y DravlnL ::e NOTE: Oees nee include cvrrenE fet [er vrltin6 pc ¢i[ ar Pav<men[ rePla<e- nenc depeslts. Cp::STiVCIION COST ESTI hTE I 1 \J ~ t - .f.f. f,: ^ _ R^ r I L.F. e.. v.Gt. Qri only b" c. F. L.F. A.<. lets. 15:00 -1 n1 L.f. L" P.L<, <Sdwalk :AAA 1 S.F. L75 i?-:`i~ !0 b" ]true Js oath LIAC \N S.F. B" P.C.C. Cross Cuter I 1<290 I S.i. .,u •J 9. w 5neet E cwauon * I 3 C.Y. Li0 1~OC. '0 t +aa ed E.valeent 22 20 G.Y. .L Jl . rneaee of Sub^rade 1 -I E.F. wnA t • (n •~ r nti A • n , 41 1 I (nver A. C. i]OO mwl TOS A. c. 1900 to 1100 cool TON I „soar \ e n. \ :p:: ~D.DO 0 :.7ea. aD p.v r 1 'Cq 1 Pr :h A.C. ('rm <hl S.F. i" 'if ck A.C. R: erlav N.F. .. .. u n f.raaa r>, •a[ S<vcr E.p. m Grade I ~[. I 4v I - I: • I EA. rret Tr ee 5 I 1 [\. 1 ~ _ _ ...DVa _ .~ 1 ~.~~ 1 1 - t I I i0 1 - JO - ' I I - I ~ ,3a.[C' 1 I Cp a 1 I 1 rq nn U. n. r.no- 1 I . I I I ~~) :a, d. G`:5 .;a101 CCSTS [,; i'_i~+~-. .^~ E'•:,':~EER L`:C It EFFG TICY FEE ": =0 __1, .:\ Y,p:F: 'E::LAitCA BO::D (C.\511) :~c0 N~• ( ti RESOLUTION N0. 04-04-03CR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT E%TENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10045 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on April 11, 1984 by H. Y. Watt as Developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north side of Hillside Channel; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as 10045; and 'WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. VOW, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that Said Improvement Extension Agreement and • said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1984, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: On Mike s, Mayor RTTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, icy er jaa .~ CITY OF RA.'~1CH0 C[,'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT • DATE: April 4, 1984 is%~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paui Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Supplement to the design contract for the traffic signal at Carnelian Avenue and Lemon Avenue Beginning with the traffic signal at Carnelian and Lemon, staff is attempting to make signal designs in the City mare standardized and less time consuming. Since this is the first in the process, the design time and changes during plan checking have been greater than normal. Because of this, the design and dr aftinq time required of the consultant will be more than ant is ioated. The increase needed has been estimated at E750.00 maximum. It is expected that the resulting plans and specifications will also result in shorcer contract times and fewer costly field changes. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that additional design time be approved, not to exceed 5750.00, for the consulting engineer, Lawrence S. Eisenhart. yR-e~pectfully suhmi;t~e , LBN: P`A', as H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA wcwMo STAFF REPORT ~~' "~~,_ ~~ .. IZ GATE: April 4, 1984 19i T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SOB,IELT: Engineering Services Contract Change Order No. 2 far Beryl Street - Hellman Avenue Storm Drain (Phase I) J The City is currently under contract with Bill Mann and Associates to complete designs for the Beryl-Hellman Storm Drain. The attached change order increases the budget for these designs from a not-to-exceed amount of 549,122.00 [0 559,222.00. The channel conditions have changed since the orginal surveys due to winter storms and due to City conducted maintenance grading •eithin the channel area. The proposed workings will establish the final hid quantities for the Droj ect as well as survey control needed to start construction. RECOMMENDATION [t is recommended that Change Order No. 2 to the Beryl Street-Hellman Avenue Storm Orain (Phase I) be approved increasing the overall not-to-exceed amount to 559,222.00. lly Lbmi l~t ed, %~ (`~~ L9N:~aa qtt achmen[ r "y CITY C S~ • DATE: Rpril 4, 1984 T0: City Council and City Man. FROM; Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engi SUBJECT: Engineering Services Cont Hellman Avenue Storm Orai The City is currently under contract designs for the 8ery1-Hellman Stc increases the budget for these ~ 549,722.00 to E59,222.00. The ch orginal surveys due to winter stor grading within the channel area. final bid avant it ies for the project construction. RELDMMENDATION It is recommended that Change Order Storm Drain (Phase I) be approved i to 559,222.00. r~ l BILL MANN & ASSOCIATES Civil Engineering • Drainage - Flood Control • Special Studies March 28, 1984 _ ~-~' ~ ° ' '~ --'File: 84-15 .... ~ ~ :1 .;a J ~ 1 l Mr. Richard Cota ~ ~~.~ -~~ Assistant Civil Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga .,, ~ _. 9;~ LC CRLtC;1C.\ 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C i':C,f,E=P.~„ Cl~i'S?ail Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Suhject: Beryl Street-Hellman Avenue Storm Drain Improvement (Phase i) - Engineering Consulting Services and Field Survey Dear Richard: In response to your le [tei of March 22, 1994, and subsequent conversation, we have separated [he proposal for the subject project Sn[o two separate proposals. This proposal is for the preliminary survey, cross-sections, and earthwork quantity update, The following services will be provided ICem Descr ip ticn (1) Field Survev Prior co Construction (a) Establish centerline control for the proposed storm drain be- tween Hellman Avenue and 19th Street and tie-out for construc- tion. (b) Provide new crass-sections (50' intervals) along proposed s[or:n drain from Hellman Avenue to 19th Scree[. (2) En eineering Services (a) Plot of existing cross-sections from field survey (l,b above), determination of detailed construction earthwork quanci ties (cut, fill, tmport/export), and preparation of cross-sections as part of bid package. The Eee schedule for the above items would be as follows: L[em (1)(a) Lump Sum (1)(b) Lump Sum (2)(a) Lump Sum 5 2,750.00 2,750.00 4,000.00 Total S 9,500.00 1874 COMMERCENTER WEST • SUITE A • 8AN eERNAR01N0, CA. 92408 • (7141 895.4309 March 28, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page two All field survey work will be provided by Linville-Sanderson S Associates, [he firm that provided the preliminary survey. Linville-Sandezson b Asso- ciates will be solely resQonsib le for the technical aspects and accuracy of the field survey work, and Bill Mann b Associates will not assume any liability as a result of the field survey. A standard rate fee schedule is attached. Sincerely, ~~~~w/ BILL C. MAN P.E. Consultin Engineer BCM:sw Attachment as noted cc: Linville-Sanderson at [n: Gary Sanderson • ~~ ~ ~.rt.r_ Manrrv & Assocrarzr Civil Engineering • prainage - Fiood Control • Spec~a! Studies STANDARD RATE SCHEDL7.E September 1, 1963 Principal Consulting Meetings with Client, Agencies and presentations to Boards, Councils $80.00/hour and Agencies, and related work Planning and EneineerinQ Principal Engineering, Project Managing $62.00/hour Project Engineering, Designing $50.00/hour Research, Field Review $46.00/hour Report Preparation $42.00lhour Designing and Drafci~ senior DesLgner $40.00/hour • Senior Drafter, Design Drafter $38.00/hour Drafter $35.00/hour Technician, Engineering Aide and $24.00/hour Junior Drafter Miscellaneous Services and Exuenses Court Appearances, reparation, 125.00/hour or Despositions and Meetings $ By Agreement ($400.24in. Clerical Delivery $ 23.00/hour Mileage $ 0.321mi1e Materials and other expenses Cost plus 15% Outside Consultants and Services Cosc plus YO% NOTE: Unless other arrangements are made, a 15': retainer will be requested ($500 minimum). Overtime will be 135% of standard hourly rates. Statements cuiil be presented bi-weekly. 1814 COMMERCENTER WEST - SUITE A f SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408 ~ (714) 885.409 MEMORANDUM ~~ ~.~ x~ ~; .,, Daee: April 4, 1484 !}-', ~' i' ~, 1i To: City Council 1977 From: Finance Mrect s Subject: Hudget Adj ustmenta for Current Hudget There are tiro items with regards [o the current Budget that needs addressing: (1) An additional $600.00 appropriation is needed in the Building and Safety Department for business forme. The recent rush of development has virtually exhausted the current supply o£ Eorma and more are needed to be printed. (2) P.0.0 2468 for $4,147 was approved last Fiscal Year, however, when the Fiscal Year ended this F.O. was overlooked in the reappropriacion process. The F.O. A2468 le for $4,147 and is the General Funds share for computer equipment ordered last year and is currently being Snetalled. • Reconm:endation: Is [hat both items be approved. Current Budget conditions indicate that resource development is cell ahead of last Fiscal Year and that these two items have verq minimal impact on the Eudget. i .~ ~",ao"~; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~' c'~~~s MEMORANDUM ~~ _ ''~ ~I b '~ im ~' DATE: ~ ~fl I TO: FR04 sued i=5 ~r ~- ._ ~ r 1 U r1 LJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OAT E: April 4, 1984 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 6. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer .~' ~~cw.aoHc i- ;' ilA ~- (C 1~2 "S 19T, SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds, Agreement and Final Map of Tract 11915-1 located at the northeast corner of 26th Street and Turner Avenue submitted by Lebrett Homes The attached resolution is for the approval of the Final Map for Tract No. 11915-1 consisting of 44 lots on 7 acres of land located on the northeast corner of 26th Street and Turner Rvenue. The bonds submitted by Lebrett Homes are in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E275,000.00 L a6pr and Material 9ond: 5137,500.00 RECOINENDRTION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution granting final approval to Tract Map No. 11915-1 authorizing the City Engineer to sign the Map and the Mayor and~City Clerk to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City, Resperjjull~y is ittEd, c~ ~ ~ ~ `~/~(N / LBH:J i~aa Attachments ~~ CHi~F~~l' JOoPS~ U~iO~' Hlu~i SCH00! DISiRlCi ~ `~°°~°~°'~°'~°° " . !1, C:E EY {i PYP STPEEi OYTaPiO C-0~6 ^,P'aP 91I6I ~ ae 4 [vnw EDO<:,i °•,a fE•V K[9 flMas , + ! ~ f ~a! ~ ... °..[ q.,,. •::, L o__., .. ,...4. ~•ta rch 27, 1984 Letter oP Ce ti`icaticn o° School J - rict C3Dacity °7ithin the Cho "_ev Joint L'a iD r, °iah School Dis`sict and the Alta Loma H. S. .tendar.ce noundaries :or the _„-icwcng cesc n_Dec ~ro~ect: Location/Description: Tract No. 11915-1 NE corner of Turner L 26th St. Vl;,^u' er o: Dwell iags; 44 single family dwellings ,;., .._ paled Ccmplztion Date: August 1984 The scncol district hereb}• cert. _'i=_s that the capacity _or 7 tudents will be -rc~•ided withi^ 24 wonths o? t^e .._ uon D: the above project. ^':is certi `ication is ~icen ..he ccada ion twat the State .,: Cali `crnLa _ontin ues tc. -1:d the provisions o? the Le:DV^C. Greene Laase,'?urchase ?.cc e` '"r.n, cr ar.c successor sec, :n s~.:ch manner c~.at thz $L3 C? . ._..03 t_pr. °Oa m37 ..nd dli aC pJ_ pu:l di 'e^h, ender ~____.._ r'11e5 dRd'T2C1.31_... h0'1 COL..^.7', "~'e CCm _ ^er 0. u..e C3paC 'S::3~ er °-~ ,^. d'._ __..,.~ ~..^.e d'tB O: .. 1?tter TpDro: _ .. _ .a 1~m.dC 7r _ 2 'a _ 'ldi r.R'pe rIDLtS bV the .._ _'V2.a.._nC C'1c3..O nO3`WL ..._.. _..uC 90-da period sha L' :al_dat_ _..~n _...._.,_taent. \ .. •\.G4VI~W4{~.~ ~.e..v ~. __'°":'~ a ;..^ .._ ..c .Ce _ by Jianne•Allen ~„ ., „f _~. =__-.. .___;-. LebretL Homes • ___. _. ,; _... _.. _,..,_n_~ 2102 Bus. Center Dr. St. 1st Irvine, CA 92715 • /!~ 7 • \~ r/ri, Cucamonga School District aCR RE C. TRILTEE. 6776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga. Celilarma 917a0 Teiepnone 17141967-6941 4:ee+~o veusauzz March 7, 1984 ~_'-4R OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY cAroL colRrE+ NILLIAM CRAWfORO GEORGIA GRlfr'. V cevlo MAu ..u LIAH RINCON lrithin Cucamonga School District and Cucamonga School District attendance boundar es for the fallowing described project: Location/Oesc notion NE corner Turner and 26th Street (6.3 acres) 'lumber of Dwelling Units _ 44 yngi ri• llinp ni is Anticipated Completion Oa to J~lv 1984 • Gentlemen: The Cucamonga School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 21 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the tondt Lion that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner Chat [he State Allocations Board may fund ail school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points, The commitment of this capacity shall expire 60 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final mao or the issuance of building pe rni is by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within chat 60 day period shall validate s ch commitment. JJi pincerel~, r / i r/ 1 `~l'eayC ~' .~.\ ti '~ `~ 1 ~'Rebe rto '/elaspue z', Superintendent \J cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga RV:vc I 1 1 L `t CITT Of RMCHO EDEIIRDR6R IRPROYERERT AiREERE RT FOR TRACT 11915-1 NNOM ALL MEN BY TNESE PRE SEXT S: That tAls agreement is made end entered into, 5n Conformance with the provisions of [he SYDd5v15 ion Map Pct of the $t ate 01 Cal Horn ta, and at the +DpliuDle Ordinances di the City o/ Ran<np Cucamonga, C al itornia, a to niclpal cprppntion, DY iEeRETT tHDMES, INCd City, hereto ett er referred to n Me City, ano ne reins ter re erre to as the eve aper, YITNESSETN: TNPT, YH EREAS, said Developer des5res to develop cart H n real property in iH d City of Shown On the condit5 ovally approved fuDdivisi0n tnown R TRACT 11915-1 end YNEREPS, sand City has established certH n requirements to 0t tee Dy sold Developer as prtrequislta tp approval o/ sH d suDdivisi to generally ldc at ed •t Nortnm st corner of Turner at 26 to Street NON, TXEAEf ORE, it is her eby •qre ed by sH d City and Dy said Developer as follows: 1. Tne Developer hereby aqr eel to construct at DeveloDer•s ea pence all itprovements described on page i here- of within twelve moot ns Irom the ei/active date Ner epf, 2. This agreement shall De etlect ivt on the Date of the resolution a/ the Council o/ coed City aDOr ov in9 this aqr lament. Trait agreement shall Da in default on Mt der follow- ing Me first anniversary date of Sato approval unless an rrten- sfon of time has Deen goofed by said City as Ner eina(t er provitl- ed. D, Tne Developer may vaguest an ar[ensian o1 time to Cpmpl ett tn! terms hereof. Saco request shall Dt suDmf tt ed to the City fn writing not :ass to an 70 Days Detore the esDirat~pn fate nerept, and sn all contain a statement o/ circumstances necessitating the eat anti on of time. Tne City snail nave the rigor to review the Drov isions o/ tots ogre ement, includf rag Me construction stand ar OS, cost estimate, and improvement slCUrity, end to regulre adjus[m cots Mere in it any suos Lntf al change has occurred during the term hereof, 1. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions a/ Mis agreement, the Cf ty tna11 here tot right at any time to cease vid Dr ovi lions to De met Dy any Iew/cal mrans, ano the reuDdn rtcov tr irom the OtveloDer and/or Mf surety the /all cost and evp en se incurred. S. Tnt Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot d{ said development 1n accordance nth the regulatlont, schedules, and fees p/ Me [uc emdnga County hater District. 6. The bevel pDer ina11 De re iDdnsfble /or replacement, relocation, or removal d/ any component of any IrrigaTion water system in can/lice with COn itructipn o/ rtguirld imDr ov <m In is to the sate sf action or the City Engineer and tot ooner o/ such water system. • -t- T^ and Dann/Ind.. P.N, !' ! 7. Improvements re DU fired tp De constructed small conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specf/ic ations of the CSty, end to the Im Dr orem ent Ptan eDOr ored by and on file in th! o/tiEe pi tDe City Engineer. Said imprprln<nts are UDulat ed on the Conitr action and Ban! Estimate, hereby inc orp or eted on page 6 nereo/, of totem /rom the smprov em ens plans listed thereon by number. the Developer small also De responsf ole /or construc- tion p/ any bansi tfoni pr of her incidental work De yand the traR Dpund ar ies as ne edt0 /or safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or pmmiss ions discovered during constructen small De corrected upon the direction o! the City Engineer, Revises work Out to said plan mods/staff ans shall be covered by the provisions d/ tMi agreement and Secured Dy the surety coven ng the original Olen ned .arks. B. ConfLr action permits small De pot aimed by the Oev eloper /rom the office o1 the City Engineer prior to start o/ work; all regu Lttons listte thereon she 11 Dt oDf er ved, with attent5on given to seyety proc court s, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to tilt art e, end to proper not l/suss on of Dwbl is utilities ene City Depertnen ti. FH lure to compiY witD this slats on shell De sub)e<t to tot penalties provide0 therelor, 9. TDe Oevelmper shall De re ipo nsi0 to for remover of all loose rocks end other de Dr is Iron DuDiic rights-oi-wy within ar ad)olninq said OeveloDment resulting Irom wdrk r<lat5ve to vfd eevelapment. 10. Ya rk done with5n ea istinq streets small D! • diligent ly pursued to tamales ton; the City shall Dave the right to complete any and all wort in ene teen! of un)ustitied delay in cOmplltipn, end to recover ail cast and eapens! incurred from tot Developer ono/or his <ontractpr Dy any lawtut means. 11. Lid Developer spell at all times following dtdica- tion of the streets end easements in said suoidirfsion, up to the compact ion and ac teat snce of said work or improvement Dy sn d Cfty Cpuncll, Sire gpod end adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every den gerous condltipn esi stmt in sa+d street or easement, and .iii Drottct the beveling Du D1ic from S u<D def ectlrt or don gerous cpndf [ions. Until the completion of ell improvements, mere in Incorporated on page 6 to be Derf ormea, each of said streets not ec ceDtea es improvements sn all De under the charge o1 sold DevttoDer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street suD3ect to the conditions ca nt of ned in a temporary street closure permit, fssued Dy the City Engineer, wn en<v<r it is necessary to Dr otect the public during tn! con itruction of the lmpr ovem tots herein agreed to be mane. 12. ParMway trees re dui red to De Olant ea snail De plena ea by the Developer elf er other imDrovem ant .ork, grading and cleanup has Deen completed. Pl anti nq small De sane as provsded Dy Ordsnence to accordance nits [ne D1anCinq d~ag~am approved Dy the City Community Development Otrec tar, fine Developer sn all De r<soonsiDle /or meintaintnq alt trees p Lnted in good ne al to un t,l the end or the quaran [eta maf ntenance Derlod, or ror one year eater Dlant~ng, wnl cnever is later, 1D. 7h! Develpper Is re sDOnsi Dle Por meet5ng alt conds- ttDns es b Dlisntd Dy the City pursuant to the Suodivlslon •1- ~~n Map act, City Ordianc es, and Lois agreement far tree development, and for the mH ntln ante of all impr or em cots con strut [e0 Hereunder until the impr ov em ant fs accepted for maintenance Dy the City, •nd no improvement security provided hereinri[h ih all De released De core such a[ce Dt ante unless otherrise prOVf dad and out horixed Dy the City [ounc it of the City. 10. This agreement shall not terminate until the mei ntenance guars nt ee security hereina/t er described has Deen released Dy tree City, or until a new agreement together Tito tree requf red lmpror ement security has Oeen su Dmitt ed to the City by a successor to the Derefn named, and by resolution of the City Council same has Deen accepted, and H5s agreement and He improvement sl cavity [Der efor has Deen reteai ld. 15. The improvement security to De {u rnis had Dy the Developer wiH this agreement shall consist a/ the fol loving and shall De 1n a form acce DtaD to Dy the City attorney: a. To secure /altnlul Derf orm an ce o/ this agreement. 1. a Op red or Dpndt Dy On! or more Duly out horf zed corporate surlt ies in Me form and Content i pet sited Dy 6overnment Code Section 66199. 1. 2, an Impr Dram ant Security InsL rument in the Iorm and CpOt lot iplclf lld by the City atL Or nl y. 3. a deposit eitD the City of money Or ne9ot5aDte Do nds of the kind ap0 rov ed for se cur inq deposits Of public monies. B. To secure Hborers and mat ertalmen: 1, a Dond or ponds by one or more duly authOrixed corporate Buret tez in tree form •nd content sDecif ita Dy Government Code Sect ton 66/99.1. 2. an ImOrovement Security Instrument in tree {orm and Content iplc if ied Dy He City attorney. 3. a deposit with City o/ money or negotiable Do nds o/ the kind apDrov ed for securing C. a casn de DOSit rite the [f ty to guarantee payment Dy the Developer to the cogs near Or Surveyor whose c arts/scat! appears upon the Final Map /or tree setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street Centerline moo ument5 and for /urnishing clot erline tie notes to tree City, Tne amount 01 tree deposit may De any amount cart if ied Dy the engineer or surveyor as acceDtaDle peymene in /u 11; or, H no value if submf teed, ens casn Oond snare De ai mown On the Construction ens Bona Estimate conte+ned nere5 n. Said casn deposit may De rN unded as soon of Droc!- dure Derm+ts alter receipt 6y the City o1 tree centerline tfe notes and mitten assurance of payment in fats from He engineer Or surveyor. D. Tne repui red bonds and the principal amounts m ere of are set Io rtn on Dage 6 of Lois agreement. 16. The Developer warrants treat tree improvements described in toss agreement ineli De free Irom de/ec is in materlali and workm dnH iD• any and all Dort+Ons o/ the impr ov!• men is toured to De ee/act the of [n+n one (I) year fpilor+ng the ddLd On rnfCn the imDrOVlminti are atf lptlO by Ih! Df[y fndil D! reDalreO or replaced Dy Developer free o/ alt charges [o He City. Tree Developer shall furnish a maintenance gu er an tee s ecun ty in a sum eau ai to ten percent (COS) 01 ens construction •3• • estimate or 5200.00, vnicnev er is greater, to secure [he faitnfut pertOrm ante pf DevelODer's oDl igatiOnS a[ dlscri bed fn this pera- graDh. Tnt mainten ante guarantee Security shall also secure the f aitRlul Der farm ante Dy the Otvelo0 er of any oDligat ion o1 the Dave lp0er CO do speci/std work wiM respect to any Dartw ay maintenance nsessme rat district. Once the imOrOV ements have Deco accepted and a maintenance goon rat ee security has D<en accepted Dy the City, the other imOrovement security deiCri0t0 in tn+s agreement may be released pr ovide0 coat such re stoic is plot rrise authprile0 by the lu DdiviSion MaD met and any appiicaOle City Ordinance. 11, Tnst the 0lv el peer Shall tike pVt end maintain such public IUOility end property tlamag< ins ur an ct as shall prOteet h+m an0 any cpnLnctOr or subco ntractOr Otrf orming wart covered Oy this agreement from Claims for property damages which may arise DlCause a/ the nature o/ the cork or from ODer ations under this agreement, mnether such ppentions De Dy hems elf or by any contractor pr 5u0 contr actor, or anyone directly Or Indirectly emp toy ed Dy sa-1d persons, ev to though such damages De not ce us<a by the rat 9119lnct of tot Otvelaptr Or any contractor ar su0cont actor or anyone lmDlOyld by said persons. The puDiic 1ia011itY and Dr ODertY damage insurance shall Ifit tot City as a005ton al insured end directly protect tAe City, Sts officers, agents and emp to gees, as mtll It tot Developer, his contactors and Ms su0contr alto rs, and ail insurance Ooilcf es istued Aereundtr sM 11 s0 it att. Tne minimum amounts of sucA insurance sn ali Ot as follow: • A. Cp ntract Dr's 1ia011ity insur once pr ovidinq DDdtly r death INDility limits o1 not itit the l nj ury D 3300,000 for ncn person and 31,000,000 tar tech accident Or occurrence, and Drope rty damage tiabii• fty IimiLS df not less than 5100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence vita an eggre gate limit of 5250,000 Ior claims which msy artSe from She opera. Lions of Tne Otv etooer in the Dtrtormance of the mark herein provided. B, mu tomOD~le tf ability insurance coverfng ail r ehicles used in the performance o/ Lois agreement pr ov i0ing bodily Injury lia0+l sty limits Of not Itss than 3200,000 Por earn Ders on and 1300,000 for taco accident Or occurrence, and DroDer [y damage tiaD~lS ty limits O/ hat less to M 150,000 for eats accident or occurrence, v+tn an aggro gate 01 hat ' leis roan 3100,000 which may ar rse from the oDlr a- tions of the 0lv eloper or his EDO [T ecLOr in Dlrf orming tot work provided /Or Ae rein. 18, TAat De/Ore the execution Of trait agreement, tot De veloDer en ell H to vita the City d certificate Or certiffcst is 01 insurance coven rag the specified +nsur ante. Each such c artih cdte shall Dear an endorsement Dreciuding the cance7lstiDns, Or red uc a Dn in coverage of any policy ev+0ences Dy such ce rt ifi<ite, Deyore the exDiret tan of thirty (30j days after [h! City than nave re tefvtd not Hicdti0n Oy registered ma+l from the insur an to earner. ms evidence of understanding the proof si ohs cool dined nCre+n, and 01 +ntt rat tD <omD1Y •+M sdm 1, the food+n der has Suomi tted the f O110wf nq deicrtaed ,mDrOVement secOr sty, and has elf Iced his n gn aturt hereto; .d. (~. ! i i r1 ~~ FAITMFUL PERFORMANCE Type: SURETY Principal Amount: 5175,000 Name and address of surety: NITERIAL 1M0 LANOA PATNENT Type: SURETY principal Pmount: Sli], 500 Name and address of surety: CASN DEPOSIT MOM UMENTATION Type: CASN princf pal Amou ni: S i.A00.00 Nam! and address o/ surety: M1II NTEMAMCE 6UARNNTEE Type: CASH Principal Amount: f 1,000.00 Name and addrlf3 DI sprlty: TO NE POSTED PRI Op TO ACCEPTANCE 1t THE C1TY IN NIT ME 55 NEA EOF, the pert i<s hereto Nave cease! these Dres en is to De duly caeca[ ed and ecknpwledyed with ali f ormali[tes r<gpire0 <y 1a+ on the dates set 1D rtN Dpp DSit! their. signatures. O ate 0~2L~ GY DY Developer ignature Deter R. NuCin gar r me Date py ,Developer gnat are n need ACCe ptld: City o/ Aancno Cucamonga, tali/ornie A Nunfci0al CDrDOretion By: Mayor I At tef [: qty ark .' l Approved: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST B[ NOTARIZED •5- • • Por Improvement : Date canpute y; File Re erence: Ctty Drann9 no. NOTF; Goes rot iMiude wrrent fee for • amittn9 pa'r~tt or paraaalt Deposits ppANT ITV UNIT ITEM D'. h:E AMWNT J9: L.f. P.C.C. curb - !2" C.f. 24^ 9+;;er 7.25 5 2,643.OG ]9J L.F. D,C.C. carp - B^ C.f. 24" g, :;er 6.00 16,5oq,JG 1,L51 Lf. D,C.C. cur0 only 5.50 5,'9:.SG ' L.f. A.C. Derm :. 50 i6i 6= S.F. 4^ v,C.C. staewa:i :.75 2ST.--°" -.:5.. S.G. Or. ve aoproacn ?. 5J IJ-T-;- 2,_52 aZa S.F. B" D.C.C. cross gutter line, curo; 3.ap H-i;'r' - 501 C.Y. Street excavation 1.50 4d3T [.Y. ;mooned neankment E.50 45_0 $. F. Drep ara:~pn pY su0?rode 0.15 b-,ABH-T~ r men tn:u; n y~ s 0 T,.-"3' TOn 0.~LS lore 1300 [ansl 2 .E 55'`39'0-d71- TON A.C. (900 to lID0 tons) 35.00 - TON A.C. (S0] to 900 tons) ci.00 _ TON R.C. Iu~der 500 tons) 60.00 _ S.f. A.C. 13^ [n uk) 0.55 S.f. Dace A.C. (trend) 1.75 ~0- S.f. 1^ to mk A.C. overlay 0.30 ~IC-TJ- _S EA. Ad)ust fewer manhole tD grade 25tl. 00 I3II~0'0- Ea. Ad;+st sewer clean out to grade 150.00 ~OSL'~ En. Ad)us: water valves m gra4e 75.00 Z30:~II- :> EA. Street fights 1000.00 15"COSII~7i' Lf. Barn<aces (mte~sec. 5500 Tin) 1.00 • L.F. 2 x a" rec.ood header 1.75 2T-',."- S.F. Aero mt oY n.C. pavement 0.35 7 -:9- Lf. Aeroval at P.C.:. curb 3. JO ~T ~£~ L.F. 0.em oval of A.C. Derm L00 ~3'S ~Zr -r' EA. S:roe' s•9ns 200.00 ~d-5'F.-d:`- EA. geEiectprs ecd ods •s 35.00 ~, 71Z~"0~ 3: L.F. Con: rote clock wall 25.00 2,. r„'S^T - S.F. Ret a+n ~~nq .x11 20.00 _ TON Ag9re9a;e Oase 7.00 V C.Y, Concrete st.ur.+rez x25.00 -_ L.F. IB" A7> 12700 7' 29.00 ~'da L.f. 2a" A:v ~15J: 0 35.00 L.f. 4B" ACD (13=, 7; 16.00 -~ EA. Cat cn Dann w 207:.00 ~- EA. Catd oasm B' ~, 29OO.W :.v -- fA. Ce:cn Dasm 4 457J. 00 ~- EA. local deo re ss~on a' 500.00 T.....^'L.'- ~- EA. Local Oeoress,on 42~ .: 100].00 1~"r'^- _r EA. Junction st•u<tu'e 5000.00 5-'.'^!C^ EA. Outlet str uc:+re, Std •iJ5 IS00. 00 Ec. Outlet str+c:+re, Sr v.. 500.00 E.. Guard po its 4J.W t,f. G.arE pacel (•aYl 25.00 Lf. Sowcut 2.00 _ EA. Neadrall (45^ wmg; apOp. 00 L.F, gedwppd ne eder I, ]5 _ S. F. Lanauap,rg d i•r~gat~pr 2.75 6]~'-"- L.r. Roll cur0 iP.C.L, 7.50 7:..-"'- ~~ Ei•. Gtro T. tees a~.~- EHGINEEAING I NSPE:T;ON FEE 5 11.61i.aR SU3 T01 AL 5,ig.•n•.60 •RfSTOAAT iON/ OR InEAT ION CASN ).d 00.AO COM1i1NGfNCY COSTS •:.n-~ +F OEVOSii IgE F'JnOABLE) /AITNNL PEAFORNAHCE BOND 11001) A-7-_; an.nc mOnJYENTn';JN SUREiY ICASY) ].Ir0,00 LABOR ANO NAiERi AL BOMD (50X1 1"..r ^, ..' •Nrsuant to City of Rancho CucMpn9a Nunlctpal Cooe, ill le I, CNPIer LOE, aODptinq Sen Bernarmno County Ca9k Titles, CMpters !-S, a c+sn nttaratlon /eellneat ton eepoa it shall 4 aaaee prior to IsswMe of N En9lneervg [onstructidn Penit . RESOLUTION N0. 04-04-02CR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORNI.4, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ANO FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 11915-1 'dH FREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11915-1 consist tng of 44 lots, submitted by Lebrett Homes, Subdivider, located at the northeast corner of 26th Street and Turner Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as proof ded in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Dy the Lity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1, That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorised to execute same • on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2, That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof Sy the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate [hereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED th!s 4th day of April, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: auren Wasserman, ty erk jaa on Mi a s, 7Aayor ;~ °~ ^~-~~ H-H-`r4 v • ORDINANCE N0. D$21.12QR- ~- v AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIR, AMENDIYG TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICI?AL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 6.08 THERETO TO REGULATE THE SLAUGHTERING OF ANIMALS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 6.08 thereto to read as follows: Chapter 6,08 SLAUGHTERING OF ANIMALS Sections: 6.08.010 Slaughter-Defined. 6.08.020 Slaughtering of Dogs and Cats Prohibited. 6.08.030 Slaughter of Certain Other Domestic Animals. 6.08.010 Slaughter-Defined. "Slaughter" means kill and Drepare for • human consumption. 6.08.020 Slau hterin of Dos and Cats Prohibited, It shall be unlawful for any person to s aughter any dog or cat. 6.08.030 S1 au hterin of Certain Other Domestic Animals. It shall be unlawfu or any person to s aughter any cart e, sheep, swine, goat, horse or mule unless such person holds, or is employed by a person who holds, a valid license issued by the State of California or the United States, authorizing the slaughtering of animals and such slaughtering is done in a manner and at a place permitted by such license. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in T~he~Oa_il~ Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntan0 0, California and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1984, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ll! - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~CG,ltq STAFF REPORT ~ ~ j x C: ~ . ;. Lp I? DATE: April 4, 1984 l5cr T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Day Creek Community Facilities District No. 84-1 Loan Pledge Agreement • Attached for Council approval and adoption is a Loan Pledge Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency and an implementing ordinance Dledg ing funds from the County portion of the redevelopment tax increment to supDOrt of the Oay Creek Community Facilities District No. 84-1. These actions implement provisions already incorporated into the Engineer's Report fixing the proposed tax rate in conjunction with 0lstrict formation. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council aDProve the "Agreement Supplementing Laan and Pledge Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Day/Et iwanda Drainage Improvements} and also recommend adoption of ORDINANCE NO.: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTRIBUTION FROM LAWFUL FUNDS TO PAY FOR CERTAIN C05T5 AND EXPENSES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES OISTR ICT. Respectfully suhmi~ed, ~~ '~ i L BH: j Attachments />' 7 AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTING LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT • BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.LNONGA (Day; Etiwanda Drainage Improvements) 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Agre einent is made and entered into this day of 1984, by and between the CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City°), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("Agency"), a public agency organised pursuant to the provi- sions of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Agency has previously entered into an agreente nt ("Loan and Pledge Agreement") with City Whereby • City has agreed to undertake the design, financing and construction of certain flood control facilities known as the Day; E[iwanda drainage improvements ("Flood Control Facilities") and regency has agreed to pledge certain funds which might become available to Agency from increased property taxes collected from properties within the boundaries of the Project to City to assist in the financing of such Flood Control Facilities. 2.2 The purpose of this agreement is to further define and clarify Che terms and conditions under which Agency will pledge certain Cax increine nt revenues generated pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 ("Tax r 1 I~ D Increment") and received by the Agency to City to assist in financing the Flood Control Facilities. 2,3 City's Council has found and determined that such Flood Cont ral Facilities are of benefit to the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project area and that no other reason- able means of financing such public improvements are avail- able to City, 3. TEP.NS. 3.1 Pledge of Tax Increment. Agency does hereby agree to incur a debt and obligation to the City and shall pledge, pay and transmit to City upon zeceipt that portion of the Tax Increment allocated to Agency by County pursuant to that agreement entitled "Agreement Regarding Rancho Redevelopment Project Area {Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment agency)" and dated February 21, 1982, less such amounts oeherwise deposited 6y Agency in Agency's Low- and Moderate- Income Housing Fund for purposes of complying with California Fte alth and Safely Code Section 33334.2. 3.2 Obligation Constitutes Indebtedness. 'this supplemental agreement shall constitute an obligation and debt of the Agency to use C::e Talc 2ncrement available pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement to assist in the financing and conseru ction of the Flood Cent rol Facilities provided for herein, and the City shall apply said funds to pay for certain of the costs and expenses relating to the Flood Control Facilities until such time as all indebtedness incurred by City to finance such Flood Control Facilities -2• ~~ has been retired. Nothin-, herein shall be construed to • require Agency to pay Tax Inc reinen[ to City for purposes of advance retirement of any indebtedness incurred by City unless Agency at its sole and exclusive option elects to retire such debt in advance. 3.3 Notwithstanding Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of this Agreement, if Ci[y~s proceedings to finance the Flood Control Facilities are halted or City does not incur an obligation or indebtedness to finance su clt Flood Control Facilities on or before December 31, 1984, for any reason whatsoever, this Agreement shall be of no further force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agre einent on the day and year first hereinabove written. • CITY OF RANCHO CUC;LMONCA Dy: __ Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk THE P.EDEVELOPMENT :1G ENCY OF THE CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCA.MO\CA Bv: ___ Chairman ATTEST: Executive Director and Secretary • -3- I~/~? ORDINANCE N0. 06.G4-@ttII `~~! j • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR CONTRIBUTION FROM LAWfUI F'JNDS TO PAY FOR CERTAIN COSTS ANO EXPENSES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has previously declared its intention and order the preparation of a "Report" relating to the in it iatf on of proceedings to create a Community Facilities District oursu ant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Comnun ity Facilities District Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Tit 1e 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter 6e referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 84-1 (DAY CREEK URRINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"; and 'WHEREAS, Section 53314.8 of the Government Code of the State of California ezore ssly authorizes a local agency, at any Lime, by Ordinance, either 6ef ore or after the formation of the Oistr ict, to authorize a • contribution from any lawful source of revenue to pay for certain of [he costs and ezpens es to said District; and 'WHEREAS, at this time this City Council is desirous to provide for a contribution in the manner and form as authorized by law. NO'W, THEREFORE, tT5 IS HEREBY ORDAINED qS FOLLOWS: SECTIOY 1. That Che above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 That this City Council does at this time provide and au thori=e o~ntribution from lawful sources to pdy for a certain portion of the costs and expenses of the District, all as specf ically set forth in an Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Said Agreement approved by this City Council on the 4th day of April, 1984, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and open for puhlic inspection. for all particulars as to the period of the contriDuti on and the method and apportionment of said funds, reference is hereby made to said aDProved Agreement, 5FCT10N 3. The contribution as aDOVe referenced, shall not constitute an 'n7ebt ed ness or liability of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ordinance No. Page 2 SECTION 4, The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk • shall taus- e~ame to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Cali ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. MiKels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. 'd asserman, rty er jaa • • ~. er. • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: March 21, 1984 RE: Ordinance re Increased Penalties Enclosed please find an ordinance to increase penalties to the level authorized by Government Code 536900 and 536901 as amend- ed in 1983. RED:sjo Enclosure • ORDINANCE NO. 1_2~ • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 1.12.020 AND 1.12.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO PENALTIES. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 1.12.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code rs'- a eby amended [o read as follows: "1.12.020 Penalty for misdemeanor. Except in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any ordinance of the city, any person convicted of a mis- demeanor for violation of this code or an ordinance of the city, or any code adopted by reference by ordinance of the city, is punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment." SECTION 2: Section 1.12.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: • "1.12.030 Penalt for infraction. Any oerson convic to o an in racoon or vio anon of an ordi- nance of the city, or any code adopted by reference 6y ordinance of the city, is punishable by: "A. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars for a first violation; "B. A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars for a second violation of the same ordinance or code with- in one year; and, "C. A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars for each additional violation of the same ordinance or code within one year." SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s-har~use the same to be published within fifteen !15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: I L MAYOR ATTEST: TY CLERK ~ ~ ~ i .. ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~u~+Afa,~ • MEMORANDUM ~~/'/,~ III' Y'V'e ~ •n Date: March 29, 1984 ~ '~a G Z To: City Council and City Hanager D ~ 1917 From: Dick Mayer, Ya rk Planner Subject: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM A, April 4, 7984 Environmental Findings and Approval to submit Land and Water Consetva ti on Fund Appli ca ti ona for the Lions Park and Alta Loma Park Tennis Court Dave lopmenU The Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Prooram which provides matching funds to governmental jurisdictions [or up to 50• of nequisition and development coats of outdoor recreation arse and fact litiea. The State of .;a lifornia Depaz tment of Parka and Recraatlon administecs the progr em for the Federal Government on a eta Lerida basis Dy dividing the State into ten (10) districts and recommending funding for projects ri thin each of th ode districts. The Federal Government has notified the State that they sill • receive 55.6 million atateride for did tribu ti on among the di stricta. The City of Raneho Cucamonga is located within Dia tract e, which also includes the Governmental jurisdi etions within the San Bernardino, Los Ange lee, orange, P ive rside, Imperial and Ventura County arias. The State has allocated District a approximately 51.5 million for successful projects, of which 5750,000 will he allocated for regional projects and 5750,000 will he allocated For less than regional projects. Regional pr ojeeta are generally Wore than 50 acres in size and less than regional projects are generally less than 50 acres in sine. The Federal Land and Water Conaerva ti on Fund Program is highly compeiiti ve and the State receives a large number of app licaeions from various jurisdictions for the small amount of funds availahle. The State has developed strict criteria by which to evaluate and recommend funding for successful appli cn bone. Even though this is a highly competitive program we 6e lieve the City should s ubmlt applications Eor the funding assistance. Because, howave [, the chances of successful appli ca ti one are minimal (but still worthwhile) we felt it neceasa ry to propose projects which, i[ the app licetions were not swceasful, it would not delay our efforts to date, (i.e. Arrow Perk). if we had proposed Land and water Conserve Lion Fund Assistance for projects each as Red Hill Basin, Heritage or Deer Creek Park, the conelderiny the amount of funding dual lab le versus the coat of each of those projects, the potential for success is nil, and reelie tlcally not woreh the labor expended to eubmie the applications. r Council Agenda Stem A, April 6, 1986 • March 29, 1981 Page 2 Therefore, the Community Servi cea Department is raqueatinq Council authorization in submi sting tro (2) project applicatlone for Federal funding under the Land and Wa ter Conaervetion Fund Prograe. The first project application will be for Lhe development of the Alta LomaPark Tennis Complex. TAis project rill complete the master plan for the park and provide four night 1l gh ied tennis courts improve manta. This project is estimated to cost approximately 5150,000 with the Land and Water Coneerva lion Fund grant ptovidi ng for $75,000 of the total cost. TAe city's matching share of $75,000 will be supported from the Park Development Trust Fund, if successful. The second project is the development of two night lighted Tennis Courts, and a defined picnic are e, with shelter. Drainage improvements rill also 6e installed as a part of the project. Tha total project cost is estimated ae $120,000 with the Land and Water Conservation Fund providing 560,000. The City's matching share of $60,000 pill he derived from the Park Development Trvat Fund. This improvemnt will also complete the matter plan for the perk. Either one or both of these projects, if funded by the grant, will provide ` much needed lighted tennis court Eaeili ti ea within the City share none ate ova ilaDle at present. Tennis facilities are available at Alte Loma Nigh School, but only during non-school hours and not at night. The provisions of these improvements will correct this situation. Additionally, both ai tea have been planned for these uses and have adequate parking available. For these reasons, we believe these projects are worthwhile application submittals. In order to submit the two appli caiionsr the City Council moat adopt the attached Resolution which approves the submi teal of aopli ea ti ons for these projects for Land end Water Conse[va ti on Fund assistance; and certifies the city has matching funds from Park Development Fe ea and can finance 100 percent of the project, SOa of whicA Will be reimbursed; and certifies the projects are compatible With surrounding land areas; and appoints the Director of Community services as the agent of the City in all metiers concerning these grant applications. Environmental aaaeaamenta have been prepared for both of these projects. These aeeeaeeenta indicate that the projects could no[ have a significant effect upon the environment and Nega Live Dec la ra ciona have been prepared for approval by the CL ty Council. Legal notices for the envi ronae ntel docume nta re re advertised in Ne Ontario Daily Report on Mach 22, 1984. Ad dltionally, the State and Local Clearingh ouee reviewed the documents. No comments were generated as a result • of those revs ewe. • .,wncil Agenda Item A, April 6, 798e March 29, 19Re Page 3 STAFF RENMMENDATIDN: That the city Cwnei l: ' 1. Find that the Lions Park Tennia and Pienic Area Deoelopeent Projeet and the Alta Loom Pa [k Tennia Complex Development Project K11 not have significant impacts on the environment and issue Negative Declarations Eor each projecU and, 2. Adopt the attached Reso to Lion approving the submission of two applications for Land and Na ter Conserve Lion Punde for the Lions Park Tennia and Picnic A[ee end the Alta Loea park Tennia Complex dove lopmeni projects. l Attachments: Initial Study, Parts 1 and II for both projects Resolution approving epplicatian subnd.tta la °~~ • RESOLUTION No. 84- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING Tx0 APPLICATIONS POR LAND AHD NATER CONSERVATION FUNDS POR THE LIONS PARK TENNIS AND PICNIC AREA, AND THE ALTA LOMA TENNIS COMPLEk DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS NHEREAS, the congrean under Public Law ES-578 has authorized the es tab li absent of a Federal Land and Nater Conservation Fund Crant-In-Aid Program, providing ma tchinq funds to the State of California and itn political aubdiviaions for acquiring landn and developing teci li[lea for public outdoor recreation purposes; and xHEAEAS, the State Department of Parka and Recreation is reponeible for the adminis tzation of the prograw within the State, setting up necessary rules and procedures governing appli ca [Son 6y local agencies under the program; and • NHERFAS, said adopted procedures eata611ehed by the State Department of Parka and Recreation require the applicant to certify Dy reno lu tlon the approval of applications and [he avni laDi li ty of local ma tchinq funds pH or to submission of said applicati one to the State; and WHEREAS, The proposed Lions Park Tennis and Picnic Area and The Alta Loma Tennis Complex Development projects are consistent xi th the 5ta tewide Comprahens ive Recreation Resources Flan: Recreation in California, Issues and Actions: 1981-1985; and NNEREAS, the projects must be compatible wish the land use Plana of those juri adi ctiona lmmedia to ly sutroundi nq she pr ojeet; NON, TH F.AEFORE, BE IT AP.SOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby: 7. Approves the fill nq of 2 applications for Land and Nater Conservation Fund assistance; and 2. Certif lea that said agency hea matching funds from Perk Developveni Fee• end can fine nce 100 percent of the projects, ha l[ of which will be reimDUraed, and 3. Cer tifiea that the projects are compatible ri th the land use plane of those jurlsdSctiona immediately surrounding the project and 4. Appoints the Director, Community Services Department ae agent of the City to conduct all negotiations, sae cute and submit all docume nta inc ludl ng but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, billing eta [ementa, and so on which may he necessary for the completion of the aforementioned projects. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED thin 4th day of April, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Was se[man, City Cle[k Jon D. Mike la, Mayor • • `~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION I, grief Description of Project: The development of two (2) lighted tennis courts and an adjacent family picnic area to include, taoles, barbeques and a small picnic shelter at Lion's Park. 2. Name and Address of Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 3. Dursuani to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required. 4. Minutes of such decision and the Initial Study prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are on file in the City Clerk's Office of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • 5. This decision may be appealed to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A wrier en appeal and filing fee must be received by the City Clerk's Office no later than 5:00 p. m., fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the City Council's decision. 6. This Negative Declaration is subject to the implementation of mitigating measures (if any) as listed on the attachments. DATED Anril 4. 19A4 Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga Title ~ ~ -./ OY[ ARwYRRI N« 1f.RDl1[ • FEDETZAL ASSISTANCE 1 "IRU' ` w"IL"' '' n u i ]• wwfu i 1 ~ GNr1 A. ' a Of~ G raarnlGnen AIRU• • WRY ..rA 4. ~ IDOIif• ~ \ LIR lrr ..RY '' ACTON unwlnon G10N b ~ Rq I AS11:R[D :f ~~ Z Ilcnruncn a In[rrr loDU I :.... Y.. IQMlFT a rteou anon I ~•^• a tL,.AI un.uNr/R[c.ns., s ffDOUL (YnD/q IOplnrunON rw. i.. A]NIrN.N]]w :City of Rancho Cucamonga n/d ~.. 1m«rlrY V«I :Community Services Department ~i iA :v.ur.D. r P,O, Box 807 i I+s ~:.. Ana 'I IS ~• 19 ~1 Ifi I a Or Rancho Cucamon a .4]Ylr :San Bernardin ~ g o ' °~ \ rmL ; un. Outdoor Recreation .. sD. :California -s Dr uw9.1130 js o.DN f]n. lNw R Chard Ma YYeer 1 rrwr ' ~C~1]p ; Acg•. Dev.] and Planning ~ el wr4w..].v..l ( /14 1 969-1tl51 %218 I i ~ ], Tall AND 0[SCIIIIT..n 01 ARL,GNT4 IROS[W R nR[ OI MRLIGNT/RICIRIpI Sj Lions Park tennis and Picnic Development 1 A.[Nr II.t R.wn Mw Nwl]r '~f+.u.m Mw,N, 4..]YNr I.R,nY. 3 Project includes development of 2 night lighted r 4,.Mww 1-.Mw in]. °s R{rY a1a/Yt, ~ tennis courts and a family picnic area with a lo-r [-cN ~ ~ shel terat lions Park. D~-1~].Yiw DMM IW .I!^RI]:rY 4Cw I r I fil]1nrNtl V L•OY C-iYl, rw.Y] ~r 16 ARM Or MOILCr IMIAC. r.v]nn ]/ ]wi r..]MN il. tlgqn YATLn nYM• ~ IM= K 01` AY~GT µ~r SWU Ya1 ~1!]6lTNG1130n[ f City of Rancho Cucamonga Y/D ['R°rY °-~~R" sw..Iw.rNr.1W~ ]. .1f/LIOM! \YOI[C( ~4w]DY4w lWrIINRI/Y)t ~~ .CLO^~ o..rr M A k/A 35 ;[~~.rlr SL IROItCT trART li. IRO][Ci OAf[T]~rYrA 4Y CYMr10N LNn YfOY• if Rd/1]/ni ~ F Y.r]. Y]re]Ynrl.ll r I 1 ]' TMR N ~ /a t 19iIMIMG ROTD Y•]r ]w.Y Y. lA [[:STING !'LML IDMTFlGION r1YYCq I. Rru '~f~ m~ r[D}RAL ADC.cTr tf ,96/OF/O1 ~ 9/a 110. %[DMAL AOM< TO RCCLiv[ RL•]r:[iY IA1w]. CY\SIW. SII nor i SL RC'IAaYA AOOLO 'la r_ional Park Service. San Francisco CA 94102 ~••• nrY SS b 'a :Y sl a ry un«rP YI Iwr]I. ' 4 'I r q~Y[ ClrnrN A.:1 •..n NnruV]] r r MrM.]/. wmun .. .Ya'« )uM 1]N i] qrl 11Np]IYLr/:NIrWr«I M MYSr] 1] r rtYRn]t] CIL r.]M]M M0nY1 '~>r~ M RLJ]]: ]ry]ry ]IY]IM '~ TM[ 1] .Y nx6 a!, w.Yr .N Yw I AMtIGnT auY ]mun/r ]r •J Nwnn. M] N' ~'C[RTVItl n]w~rvNwx]]mrtw «A r]nr Ol Std to Of ~a11 POfnld L^: •]'TYAZr '~«u .w .reMr ..«ur,nwmY-~ m Southern Calif. ASSOC. of ;overnment's ~ a ss \ nnD rw: ND nv \ n u11 .:AR slsnlD glace'" 'tlilliam L. Holley, Di rec [or ~ ''••' «^YS Lf. ^'~1Lnrem[! Community Services Department!' ,~ I ~L~1' Oy C6 ,1a AD[r1aY ryAN[ ~-~ ei ARIIG. r..AnA N Si ORDANIMTIDM. YNIT Sl. AONINISiM"a OIRCS ~•`~ ; S lU' CUl AaO:IGiiOry ~ I I IJikT:fIGiICN S If. AOq[31 ~ M Y[DR]AL 6MNt ~ ' IOM1'ti1GT10n ll. ACi:ON TARLN ~ :1 r1NCC10 lrT «]nJ Y. ~ k Y]n «RRG YY ' TN0 ~ 7 l". • AOARpp _e /i1RLL f Ol tl, ACT:011 OA'Sr '1 [ 19 d '~ ~ \ EO[.^.ID ~ f. NRtic? 1D ii -: NT:C. :OR ]D:Ii:ONq rvlOnM.F i 14 YrR «Ry,L YY lCn ,.YA.r w u.«v.Y .RwRrr n0 r, • [[I'1RR0 Inf ' a AR C1 ~ ~n if YI[iDYOR 1. i::Al 00 '' lf. I[LLARnO ACCRO ~ ; rJ L DfRlWD I . anrcR i .00 'i i ~ ^ . RTMOMIIR ' r. TDM1tI I s . W ' G Tr r' W fmgAL AOWC9 A-fi AtON ]1f•101 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA INITIAL STUDY P:1 RT I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87,00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the p ro7ect applicatien is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Oeve lopment Review Cc-..mi ttee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no si.eni- fic3nt environmental impact and a Negative Declaraticn will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Smpact Report will be prepared, or 3) An addi tioral information report sho::I3 he supplied by the applicant giving further inforra- • tion concerning the proposed project. PRGJ ECT TITLE: lion's Park Tenni< cam ten xnd P' n5c spa nauet..~pn} APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESSr TELEPHONE: ::AAE, ADDRESS, TELEPHC:iE OF PERSON TO 9E CONTACTED C C::CLRN ING THZS PROJEC^+: Rirh d Nay;pr aar4 Olannar r_. _. 't •~ ~e o~.+~n~ rs am y1,~7145 9A9 tA51 %91A LGCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NC.) 9161 Ra line R d R rh C m a C 1'fi ~gpygar Parcel Na ~ Jil 78 57 858 L IS'P OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REC IONAL, STATE .::p FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: No R A - I-1 ~"! IvILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO ~ 1. Geate a substantial change in ground contours? ~ 2, Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? ~ 3. Create a substantial change in demand fer municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? ~ 4. Create chances in the existing zoning or gene ral plan designations? ~ i. Remove any existi.^,g trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? 3::plar.atioa of any Y_S answers above: ia'C'._;:::: If the project involves the construe ucn of residential snits, cc:-,p _ete the fo r:n on the next page. C_RTIFICaTION: I hereby certify that the stat_nents furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial eva lcation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, stateae^ts, a..,. i n:ozmation oresent^_d are true and correct to the best of r ow ledge and belief. I farther .., dersta nd `hat additio r.a':~ i;.form anon may be required to be scbmitted hefore an adec t:a to e :•a 1'.:a a on can be mace by the Development Review Co"'_•nit~ee, oa `_= Fe 6ruary 2, 1984 Signature ~ '_ _ f 2 ~cJ /i_l1~,E~ Title .. _ _ I-3. .. . . n • CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA PART II - INITIAL STCDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: February 2, 1984 APPLICANT: f+~v of Rancho Cucamonga FILI:iG DATE: LOC NUt~EA: PROJECT: Lion 5 Park Tennis Comolex 8 Picn. Arra nev 1 nmant PROJECT LOCAIION: 9j61 Baseline ooad 4a nn hn f,ramnnQa_ Calif_ 9179^ I. EVNIROy^{EIITAL IMEACTS (Exp lanacion of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached shee cs). 1. Soils and Geology. NL11 the proposal have signi: icanc results in: a. l:nscab le ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Dis r~.~c io ns, displacements, compac cion or burial of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface cor.ccur intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modiEicac ion of any unique geologic or physical feacu res? e. Any potential increase in wind oc water erosion of soils, of Ecccinq etcher on or oEE site condi cons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition'. g. Exposure of people or property to Seo logic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the race of extraction and/or use of any mine[al resource? 2. Ityd ro logy. Nlll the proposal have significant results in: YES HAl'SE NO x x x x x __ x r7 L~ YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of planes into an area? Y- • d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? ~- Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: OF.ange in the chatacceris tics of species, a . including diversity, dis cribu[ion, or numbers of any species of animals? ~ 6. Redu<cion of [he numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ~ li- e. Inc roduccion of new or disrup cave species of animals inm an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? 7L_ Dece:io ra cion or removal of existing fish or d . wildlife habica:? - E... 5. Ponu lac ion. t.'i11 the proposal have signiE leant re sines in: a, ::i11 the proposal alter the location, discri- 6ucicn, dens icy, diversity, or growth rate of • c're human population of an area? x- Will the proposal offecc ex is cing housing, or h . create a demand for additional housing? _- Y- 5. Soc io-Economic Fac co rs. Will the proposa'_ have 5 ;g ;iElcanC cesulCS in: a. C'nar, qe is local or regional socia-zco nomic chara<czris[ics, including econr,ic or co^c:erc ial diversity, tax rate, ar.d pre pe rcy values? -- ~" b, Will prajece <oses he equitably dis :: ihuced ar..onq project beneticiarie s, i.e., buyers, z tax payers or project users? -- - 7, Land L'se and Flannin¢ fonsideracion s. Will the proposal 'nave signiciea nc resu:cs in? A substantial alce ra cion of the present or % a. planned land use of an area? -l - A conf lice with any designac ions, objectives, b . policies, or adopted plans of any governmental x • entities? -- - c. An Lmpacc upon the qulalty or quantity of exlscing conaumpclve or non-consumpclve x rscraaeional opportunities? - ~ - 2 7 YES MAYIIE NO 11. Aes [het1cs. Will the proposal have significant • results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? X b. The treat ion of an aesthetically offensive site? x c. A conflict ui[h the objective of designated or paten [ial scenic cocridors? x 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will [he proposal have a signif icanc need far new systems, or alterations to the following= a. Electric power? ~ _~_ b. :latural or packaged gas'. x c. Conaunicacions sys Gems? __ % d. Water supply? ~e e. liascewater facilities? X • f. Flood co ncrol structures? x g. Solid waste facilities? ___ _x h. Fire pro to<tion? _X i. Po: ice protec[Son? __ _x j. schools? _x k. Parks or ocher recreational faci'_i:ies'. x I. Ma in cenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control fat ilities'. x m. Ocher gave rrmeneal services? __ _X 17. Energy and Scarce Resources. Wili the pre ncsal have significant res ulcs in: a. Use of suhscan ci~l or excessive fuel or energy' __ z b. Subscan r.al increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? ~ ~ c. An increase in the demand for developnenc of new sources of energy? __ x d, An increase or perpecua ciao of ehe conaump clan cE non-renewable forma of energy, when Eeaaib la renevabla sources of energy are avellab le? _ x 2c3e i . III. DETER.`1TNATION On [he I basis of this initial evaluation: find the proposed proj etc COULD NOT have a signif icanc effect • g ~ on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant I I eF£ecc on the environment, there will not be a signif icanc ei£ecc ~-: in this case because the mitigation measures described on an acca<hed sheet have been added to the project. A OEGATIVE DECLARATION GILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project NAY have a signif icanc effect on the C envirnaenc, and an EWIRON`tE27i FACT REPORT is required. i ~ Dace February 2, 1964 ~ ~~~ ~..tv~-~ ~~'1-dCj,t~_ Signature Park Planner Title 0 • ~4, ~ ~~ ~c L m r---- ~~~ ~~ ~ `P~,ICILIIJli L~~ ~# ~~ J~ n ~~ J N L L 3 ~3tDE-.1'tlM... I l~ .....~ .~ ,. --- ~ L, 9 ~- -~ s wl ~^ .orm.r ,rw... .,f; _([ o e ) ~ a .v-4i~•jF~•"~'a~ L °~~li'= 1 I 0+°r. ,;^~'' f`- ,~a ~ ~1"'•, =~+td~ 91701 s. "--"/i. 1 ®'r ~1.1: ~,~„~tS .=7~ ALTA LOMA m ,.: 4A!La ~;'- ~a . = s"r ~9 9-,t.<~ ~- ::.:-~~ "Sd ._.. T o~ ;'. m ~ - -_ :::: ~. . A_ ,~-- dM VIS T _. _ _ ~~ ~~ ~ macho ~' 1 • :~ ._,. a- . , amoag iF I : .a :: - - ~ . 91730 ~': ~~,. a ' ~~' -,: _ .! .:~ i :~, .~ ~ ~ ~.,-.. ; ~. ; R ~., t s- I -- ~ ~ ~ !~~`~ . ~:I j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 4, 1984 TO: City Meneger end City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Personnel Classiticetion Study ~LS~tro 5j ~ ~T A F ~ 2 ~. > 19' During the 1983-84 budget process, the City Council indicated en interest in considering a personnel classification study. The intent of such a project would be twofold. First to study each o[ our position classifications, end determine it the present tasks being performed by the employees ere wfihin their position description end job title; second, to create career paths (where warranted by the study), which would enable the City to provide employees with the added incentives associated with growth, professional development, and mobility. As the City Council is aware, we have gone through many changes during the pest few years in developing desired service levels for the community. Our first classification study was performed in June, 1980, end since that time, the staffing end service needs of our city have evolved to a more complex level of duties. We have periodically made many minor adjustments in our classification end compensation plans during the pest tour years, and at this time it appears these plans are no longer appropriate. With the prospect of continued growth end requisite expansion of service in more complex areas of responsibility, it would be to the City's advantage to reestablish a classification plan that is closely aligned with the present functions of our employees. A classification study of this sort would address these needs end allow the City to utilize our employees to the highest level of their skills end ability. We have received proposals from the [oLLowing three firms: William Hamilton end Associates, Management Services Institute, end Ralph Andersen and Associates to perform a personnel classification study for City o[ Rancho Cucamonga. Each of the group's approach to Me project ere similar, however, Ralph Andersen's appears to be the most comprehensive including the following elements: PHABH t - ADMINIHTRAT7VH e. Review and Finalize Workplen b. Meet with Employees / ~ April 4, 1984 Personnel Classification Study Page 2 PNASB D - CLA~D7CATION a. Employees complete Questionnaires b. Analyze Questionnaires c. Conduct Employee Interviews d. Prepare and Review Draft Organization Report e. Develop Class Concepts and Allocate Positions f. Review Class Concepts with City g. Draft Class Specifications h. Review Class Plen with City i. Undertake Employee Aeview Process PHASE ~ - COMPBNSATION a. Identity Lsbor Market Employers and Benchmark Classes b. Collect Survey Deta o. Analyze Deta end Internal Relationships d. Evaluate Current Pay Administration Policy e. Prepare end Review Salary Recommendations • PNASB IV - PREPARE AND PRHSENT PA4AL REPORTS e. Prepare Final Report b. Present Final Reports Any of the groups could provide the City with an adequate study, although it appears • Ralph Andersen end Associates would be best suited [or our present needs. N respect to the cost of the study, below is fisted the fees as proposed by the firms. Management Services htstitute - SI6,790+ clerical, copying, telephone, business license, 5100-5150 per each new class division added, and minor incidents. Wi1Asm Nemilton end Aseoeiatea -;17,360+ telephone, copying and incidentals. Ralph Andersen end Aeaociatea - 511,880+ copying, clerical, [revel, telephone to a maximum not to exceed =17,000. The incidental travel cost with Ralph Mdersen and Associates will be minimized through his coordination o[ workload within the Southern California area. Additionally, all sieps wiR be taken to maximize efficiency to minimize all incidental costs. RECOMMBNDATION: The City Council direct staff to proceed with conducting a personnel clessifieation end compensation study utilizing the professional services o[ Ralph Andersen end Associates for a maximum fee not to exceed =17,000. Additionally, that the study be completed and prepared for implementation as part of the adoption process [oc the 1984-85 fiscal year budget. • RAR:mk ~yS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: April 4, 1984 T0: Members of the'Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, Deputy Executive Director BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MICROCOMPUTER FOR FINANCIAL MODELING At the February 14, 1964 meeting, the Agency authorized staff to proceed with the purchase of a CCS Calstar III micro-computer system for our financial model for a price not to exceed f10,000, which was the lowest bid. Before proceeding with the purchase, we were alerted to possible problems in the production company, California Computer Systems, the manufacturer and wholesaler of the computer component of the system. Further investigation revealed that CCS filed or was about to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The future of the company is at best uncertain. Staff has consequently reexamined the second low bid, the ONYX 5001 A system. Our conclusion is that the ONYX is a somewhat better system than the CCS Calstar, but at a somewhat higher price. The reputation of the company in the industry, however, is spotless, whereas the future of CCS is questionable. The ONYX 5001 A package originally bid at 513,990 plus tax. However both staff and our ccnsultant have negotiated a best and final offer for the ONYX package as follows: ONYX 5001 A Computer (CPU} 129 K RAM, Magnetic tape Back up 14 MB Hard Disk 3 Ports (for accessories) WYSE 50 CRT Terminal Anadex 9625 Printer Operating Software Connection Hardware Tapes and Ribbons TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE: 511,324.00 RDA Staff Report Microcomputer for Financial Modeling April 4, 1984 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: In light of our need for an Oasis-based system for inancia mo a ing purposes, it is recommended that the Agency authorize purchasing the ONYX 5001 A package from the next loNest bidder, Independent Systems House, Inc., for a total package price not to exceed E11,324 plus tax. Res ctfull„ bmitted, JACK LAM, AICP '-^•~---~~. Deputy Executive Director JL :OK:jr vaaa yr n.niv~nv ti~unt¢vivtrtf .o GU~afp^ MEMORANDUM ~ ~~, y'~'i' F' iii T0: City Council ~ 7Bu FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman /W' City Manager fff///~~~ SUBJF,CT: Position-Claseif ication Plan Some members of the City Council have expressed concern whether or not a full position classification plan is necessary a[ this time. Another option suggested Is that the staff handle the reviea of class ificationa, pay survey and organlxational analysis. Listed below are [he primary advantages and disadvantages of each alternative: Position-Classification Analysis by Oufeide Firm 1. Outs tde firm has broader experience because they represent clients in numerous cities and the private sector. 2. Outs ids firm will provide objeccivity. 3. Outside firm x111 supply Council with some comparative data from the private sector. 4. Use of ou to ids firm with no bias may have greater credibility with employees and, perhaps with the City Council. 5. Outs tde firm can have entire study completed in a timely manner so chat i[ can be implemented when the 1986-85 budget is approved. 6. Outside firm will provide en analysis of the entire ocganlaa[fon. Position Classification Analysis by Staff 1. There will be a dollar savings if CL[y employees conduct [he study. 2. City employees have a thorough knowledge of [he organ taation. 7. City employees have good cred ib tli[y with the City Council based on past actions. ' City Council .~ ~ kE: Position Classification plan April 4, 1984 Page 2 Recommendation Ifiile [here are advantages to either of the approaches outl Sned, it Is the recommendation of [he City Hanager that the Council approve the firm of Ralph Andersen and Associates to conduct the class lE icat ion and compensation study. I[ is our view [hat because of Che City's rapid growth, and a corresponding demand on our personnel co meet [he challenge of a heavy and often unpredictable workload, an outside analysis of our City organization ie appropriate. The goals of this study should be as folloxs: 1. To analyze internal working relationship between classifications 2. To recommend adjustments in these internal relationships where needed. 3. To recommend a salary schedule which evaluates salar iea paid in the private sector as well as the public sector. 4. To recommend a salary schedule xh ich evaluates [he internal working relationships between class if Stations. 5. To analyze [he duties required of each employee classification. 6. To provide an overall enalys is of the City's organizational structure. This phase of the report may Snc lode organlzat tonal changes [o improve the City's overall effectiveneae. LMN:baa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 3, 1984 TD: ?i ey r, nrzn ai 1, SRCV: Lauren 'A. Wasasrma~~ Ciry Nana~er SUB•IE~T: 4erommendod Sa tart' Adjustmentq for e, lseted 9~,`i cirtta It i,a recommandsd shat the compengrstion !'nr alt slacted City officiaLa he increased in accnrianas u+',th provi aiona or the ;nvarnman*. Code. Thiq change, ~;' apnrnve~i, m;.Lt rsprsssn*, the °ina*, coat o,° Living adjustment for eteetad o; ;Fi ctiaLs =inca the Cisy's incarporation, even though thr, 1,afJ permits annual adj carmen tq of +m to fiva percent per year for rit;~ counciZmemhers. C' is proposed that the sn Lz ry adjaq *.men*s he na foLLrn+s: 4. ^,i ty Tneaqure^ S50 per month 9. City ^•le»h $100 Per month r• Ci.,,, Cnuncilmembe»a 57,5 per mo~rh ^hs nro?need aogt of Li vin, ad.justmanr, °nr .^i ^,:~ 7.z~.,i,:i tm?mhsra rrp~egsn is ar mzara ve of ?_: i2 percent. The proposed ~ad,?unrmsn*, an„ other stgr.^s1 pox3t;,ons is nn ev?rn ro, of npprazimateZ,y 4.7,3 percent pnr }ea ~. 4ecnmmen dattion :r, is racommsn ia~t 'hat rno ^, iry Cmzncil rtnornve tha ~, as r, z,° tivin;7 ad,jua<msrtt.< "vr steered af,`tciaLs. L"W: hna T0: City Council V{t 1 a v~ as v va u,~ a~v.~ MEMORANDUM FAOM: Lamcen Wasserman Mayor SUBJECT: Economic Outlook 1984 Con erence ~~\~ x ~~' i9'. ~ The City has been lnvit ed to parcic spate in the 1984 Conference aponsered by Economic Development Department of San Bernardino County. The cost Eor display tables range between 5200 and $275 depending upon location. If the City Council wighea co part ie spate, tc is recommended that the S2OD display atea be approved From redevelopment funds. The Conference is scheduled for Aptil 26, 1984. Late[ in the year there will also be art Economic Development Conference a[med primarily ac those tnteres tad in developing In the west end of the wunty of San Bernardino. ' It is recommended that iE the C1[y Count i2 wishes to have city parcic ipation fn the Economic Developmen[ Conference an April 26[h that 5206 he appropriated from the redevelopment account far tental of a display area. Staff wilt prepare the display mater tals as ve have done in the years past. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT GATE: April 4, 1984 T0: Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, Deputy Executive Director BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MICROCOMPUTER FOR FINANCIRL MODELING At the February 14, 1984 meeting, the Agency authorized staff to proceed with the purchase of a CCS Calstar [II micro-computer system for our financial model for a price not to exceed f10,000, which was the lowest bid. Before proceeding with the purchase, we were alerted to possible problems in the production company, California Computer Systems, the manufacturer and wholesaler of the computer component of the system. Further investigation revealed that CCS filed or was about to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The future of the company is at best uncertain. Staff has consequently reexamined the second low bid, the ONYX 5001 A system. Our conclusion is that the ONYX is a somewhat better system than the CCS Calstar, but at a somewhat higher price. The reputation of the company in the industry, however, is spotless, whereas the future of CCS is questionable. The ONYX 5001 A package originally bid at E13,990 plus tax. However both staff and our consultant have negotiated a best and final offer for the ONYX package as follows: ONYX 5001 A Computer (CPU) 128 K RAM, Magnetic tape Back up 14 MB Hard Disk 3 Ports (for accessories; NYSE 50 CRT Terminal Anadex 9625 Prf nter Operating Software Connection Hardware Tapes and Ribbons TOTRL PURCHASE PRICE: (11,324.00 RDA Staff Report Microcomputer for Financial Modeling April 4, 1984 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: In light of our need for an Oasis-based system for inanci~'a modTing purposes, it is recommended that the Agency authorize purchasing the ONYX 5001 A package from the next lowest bidder, Independent Systems House, Inc., for a total package price not to exceed E11,324 plus tax. Res ctfull% bmitted, ~, JAVCK L-aAM,, AICP -•'-- • -r..~_ Deputy Executive Director JL:OK:jr ia: Councilman Chuct• Ruquet and Memhers of the Fancho Cucamonga City C'ounr,xl From: Etiwanda and Fancho Cucamonga Re=_~dents Subject: Animal 512ughter in Fesidenti al Ar eras Date: April ~, 1964 We, the undersiyned residents of the Fancho Cucamonga area, express through this missive our tut .al s~.~ppmrt for the ban on animal slaughter in residential areas. As the community grows, certain measures become necessary to gi.iar antee the physical antl Went al well-beinq of all its citizens. Animal slaughter in the b ac 4~y and and quite often, side yards of houses separated by no more than ten feet of property, ~eorpar dazes the peace and well-being of several of us, residents o4 this area. The: menLai anguish evperienc ed by some o; us and our children as we hear the noises of horses and other kinds of animals being sl a~aohtered, 4requently right at our windows, cannot be put into words, Attempts at shutting out the gruesome noises are futile, and ;requentl y, children as well as adults, find themselves under' extreme emotional stress that is relieved as time pauses but tha± is renewed with each ocurrence, which in certain cases is very frequent. pntl then mere is the tli sturbi ng sight ni bone remains and entrails thrown out on the street, or frequently Sound in the properties of mm~-perpretator nel ghbpr s, constituting a di =_turbing physical evitlence that at. this point acquire=_ a polluting character, Chus yeop.ar dfzi nq the health of the resitlenis of the neighborhood. We ;eel that these practices tln consti lute a health hazard, one that directly affects the health standards of a r.i vil3:ed and modern community. For this reason, as well as 4or F.he unnecessary antl painful stress it brings into the live=_ of many of the residents of this area, we hereby sign this petitf nn to communicate to you our feelings on the oar,. It must be matle into a law. Sincerely yours, }~~~~~NAME/7 yy'"t.. ~ C'~~.r~ r ~~~'^~ ADDR'ES5 `~35'r~'~,~F'cd Zt[ ~U7iu~ Y3Yo (.1e.u~~ I'~ ,, yEHRS IN THE AF'EA ~- ~D ~: ~~5i$a~~~~~~~~~ E A' mp ~~~~~~~~~aA ~~7~ ~ ~~ ~~ G a 4~t~g ~ ~w ~~~~~~~~'~a~9~~~ E g.~7 2 c~ ~..'~ .~~ v~ ~~ ~~ ;~~ ~~ ~ ~m > b~ fi~S' ~~'.~ ~~~ ~', ~, g~ . N ~~ ~~ N o ~~ ~~ a ~~ ~~~~~se~A~~~ac~~is~g€~ ~ gg ~~~~ 33 q ~~. Ag ~ G ~ ~~g~~~q~og6~ ~. t ~ ~' ~m 6 ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ s~aT .~ ~~~~ ~ c ~~~~' R~r* ~~~~ t~ ~ ~