HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/06/20 - Agenda Packetr •
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
June 20, 1984 - 7:30 p.m.
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the
meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
• B. Roll Call: Wright Buquet Mikels
Dahl _, and King
C. Approval of Minutes: May 3, 1984
May 16, 1984
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
A. Thursday, June 21, 1984, 7:15 p.m. - PARR ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, Lions Park Community Center.
B. Tuesday, June 26, 1984, 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY
COMMISSION, Community Library meeting room.
C. Wednesday, June 27, 1984, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING, Lions Park Community Center.
D. Thursday, June 28, 1984 7:00 p.m. - CITY COUNCIL BUDGET
MEETING, Lions Park Community Center.
E
City Council Agenda -2- June 20, 1984
1
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The
following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by
the
Council at one time without discussion.
A.
Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 84 -06 -20 and
1
Payroll ending 05/27/84 for the total amount of
$4,728,545.92.
B.
Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 84 -16 for On -Sale
5
Beer 6 Wine Eating Place License, Sophie H. Kim, 8760
Base Line.
C.
Forward Claim (CL84 -12) against the City by Henry S
6
Betty Hall, auto accident on May 9, 1984, located on
Archibald Avenue, to the City Attorney and Insurance
Carrier for handling.
D.
Forward Claim (CL84 -13) against the City by Monica
15
Freyermuth, auto accident on December 21, 1983, located
at 9161 Base Line, to the City Attorney and Insurance
Carrier for handling.
•
E.
Approval of acceptance of Parcel Map 8179 and Real
19
Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from
Ted Mayhew for his project located at the northwest
corner of Acacia Street and Cottage Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -175
26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT` 'OUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP 8179
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -176
27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM TED MAYHEW AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TD SIGN THE SAME
F.
Release of Bonds:
Tract 10277 -1 - located on Carnelian Street, south of
28
Almond Street; surety, Chino Valley Bank,
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $15,000
City Council Agenda -3- June 20, 1984
r 1
L J
Assessment and Development Review 84 -09, Bates
(Ashwill /Mawklns).
28
29
30
36
44
46
50
55
Sapphire Street Sidewalk Improvements - contractor, Tri
City Construction.
Labor and Materials Bond $15,451.15
Michael J's Restaurant - located on the southeast
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Turner Avenue; owner,
Michael is Restaurants.
Accept: Cash Deposit (Maintenance $1,777.00
Guarantee)
Release: Certificates of Deposit $59,250.00
$118,550.00
G.
Approval of award of Citywide Street Tree Service
Contract to the lowest, responsible bidder, United
Pacific Corporation of Santa Fe Springs, California for
a unit price bid of $2,222.75.
R.
Approval of award of Annual Contract for Traffic
Striping and Pavement Marking to the lowest,
responsible bidder, Safety Striping Service, Inc., of
•
Fillmore, California with a unit price contract
estimated at $71,594.00.
1.
Approval of City Offices Lease Agreement with A.M.
Reiter Development for a term of thirty -six months.
J.
Approval of award of Bear Gulch Place, Arrow Route and
Arrow Park Grading Improvements Contract to lowest,
responsible bidder, Vance Corporation of Upland,
California for $87,490.50 plus 10% contingency for a
total of $96,239.00.
R.
Approval of renewal of Citywide Parkway 6 Irrigation
Maintenance Contract with SCLM Landscape Contractors
with a 4% increase in the unit costs.
L.
Approval of agreement with CalTrans for utilizing
Freeway right -of -way land and authorize the Engineering
Division to solicit voluntary labor from California
Youth Authority for the landscaping of the proposed
dump transfer site, located next to Alta Loma Park in
Freeway right -of -way land.
M.
Set public hearing for July 5, 1984 for appeal of
Planning Commission decision denying Environmental
Assessment and Development Review 84 -09, Bates
(Ashwill /Mawklns).
28
29
30
36
44
46
50
55
0
City Council Agenda -4- June 20, 1984
N. Set public hearing for July 5, 1984 for appeal of
Planning Commission Decision denying Time Extension for
Conditional Use Permit 82 -20, Sharma.
0. Set public hearing for July 18, 1984 for appeal of
Planning Commission Decision approving Tentative Tract
12650, Deer Creek (joint appeal by Deer Creek property
owners and applicant).
P. Set public hearing for July 18, 1984 for approval of 61
Annexation No. 4 to Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. I for Tracts 12316, 12316 -1, 12317,
12317 -1, 12364, 12364 -1, and 12402
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -177 80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S
REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (TRACTS
12316, 12316 -1, 12317, 12317 -1, 12364,
12364 -1, AND 12402)
• RESOLUTION NO. 84 -178 81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,
AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID
ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 11 PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OBJECTIONS THERETO (TRACTS 12316, 12316 -1,
12317, 12317 -1, 12364, 12364 -1, AND 12402)
Q. Approval of fund transfer request to purchase 83
microfiche for $500.00 and copier for $3500.00.
R. Approval of Resolution approving the environmental 84
assessment and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for
the proposed Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Improvements.
L]
City Council Agenda -5- June 20, 1984
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -179 97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY
AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR
THE PROPOSED LEMON AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND HAVEN
AVENUE
S. Approval to recommend the Grant of Utility Easement to 1 98
the Southern California Edison Company through Arrow Cn�
Park and the Acceptance and or execution of Consent to (_ � C1KCLw+t O
Encroachment granted to the City by the Southern
California Edison Company across said property and
execution of agreement between the City and the Central
School District pertaining to the noted Grant of
Easement.
4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING 104
TENTATIVE TRACT 12532 - ARCHIBALD ASSOCIATES - The
development of 111 zero lot line homes on 14.5 acres in
the Low - Medium Residential District, located between
Archibald and Ramona Avenue at Monte Vista Street - APN
202 - 181 -05, 060 15, 16. Item continued from June 6,
1984 meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -180 178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 84 -34,
CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 12532
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRI' "5 180
AMENDMENT 83 -07 - ARCHIBALD ASSOCIATES - A Development
Districts Amendment from Medium Residential (8 -14
du /ac) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 4.5
acres of land, located on Archibald, south of Victoria
- APN 202 - 181 -15. Item continued from June 6, 1984
meeting.
J
City Council Agenda -6- June 20, 1984
ORDINANCE N0. 228 (first reading) 189
AN ORDINANCE OF/YHE -e1T \Cf1gWJL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, -CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 181 -15, LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD, SOUTH OF
VICTORIA FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DU /AC)
TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC)
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
AMENDMENT 84 -01 - RICHWOOD - A Development Districts
Amendment from Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to Low -
Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 00 acres of land,
located on the north side of 9th Street, between Baker
Avenue and Madrone Avenue - APN 207 - 261 -02 and 03,
207 - 132 -01 through 37. Item continued from June 6,
1984 meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 226 (second reading) 190
AN ORDINANCE Q OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 207 - 261 -02 AND 03,
• AND 207 - 132 -01 THROUGH 37, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET, BETWEEN BARER AND
MADRONE AVENUES FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14
DU /AC) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU/AC)
D. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 192
NO. l
RESOLUTION NO. 84- 181 206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AND
APPROVING FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
E. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 207
NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY)
V
City Council Agenda -7- June 20, 1984
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -182 234
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 FOR THE CAL
YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE IANDSCAPIN� AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2 (VICTORIA
PLANNED COMMUNITY), AND APPROVING FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT
F. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 235
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2 AND 3
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -183 240
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,
AND APPROVAL OF FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -184 244
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2,
AND APPROVAL OF FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -185 247
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
(VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY), AND APPROVAL OF
FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
.0
City Council Agenda -8- June 20, 1984
G. ORDER THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF 248
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 WITHIN TRACT NO.
11915 -1 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TURNER
AVENUE AND 26TH STREET
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -186 253
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 AND
ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
H. ORDER THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF 255
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 FOR IRE TERRA
VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -187 272
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF
. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA
VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY)
I. ORDER THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF 274
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 FOR THE TERRA VISTA
PLANNED COMMUNITY
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -188 269
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA
VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY)
5. NON- ADVERTISED HEARINGS
A. ESTABLISHING A PARKS COMMISSION - Item continued from
May 2, 1984 meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 225 (second reading) 29L
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING, A PARK DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO
THE CITY COUNCIL ON MATTERS PERTAINING TO
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA
City Council Agenda -9- June 20, 1984
0 RESOLUTION NO.0 124 293
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING
SCHEDULE FOR REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE PARK
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
A. SHERIFF'S CONTRACT - Consideration of annual law 294
enforcement service contrac with County of San
Bernardino Sheriff's Departm, in the amount of
$3,079,762.00 for fiscal year 1984 -85.
BASE LINE MEDIAN DESIGN - Landscape and construction 297
design concept for the Base Line Median, east of Haven
Avenue. Item continued from June 6, 1984 meeting.
C. DESIGNATION OF FOOTHILL FREEWAY INTERCHANGE AT DAY 305
CREEK BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE - Recommend approval of
resolution requesting CalTrans to designate and protect
• rights-of -way to construction Route 30 Freeway
interchange at Day Creek Boulevard and East Al.enue and
to eliminate the interchange designation at Etlwanda
Avenue. Item continued from June 6, 1984 meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -172 307
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REQUESTING
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DESIGNATION OF FREEWAY INTERCHANGE ON ROUTE
30 AT DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE
D. REVISED COST SHARING AGREEMENT WITH U.S. ARMY CORPS OF 309
ENGINEERS FOR THE CUCAMONGA CREEK RECREATION PROJECT -
Approval of a revised Cost Sharing Agreement between
the Corps of Engineers and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, increasing the Cucamonga Creek Recreation
Project from $570,000 to $750,000.
E. STATUS REPORT ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION BY THE CITY OF 320
FONTANA OF A PORTION OF OUR EXISTING SPHERE OF
INFLUENCE - Staff will update the City Council on the
statue of the annexation request, Staff will be
presenting a Resolution for Council's consideration and
adoption.
E
City Council Agenda -10- June 20, 1984
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -189
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OPPOSING THE PROPOSED
CHANGE IN THE CITY'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND
THE ANNEXATION BY THE CITY OF FONTANA OF A
PORTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S EXISTING SPHERE
OF INFLUENCE
F. AWARD OF CONTRACT TO RWR ASSOCIATES FOR ELECTRICAL 328
ENGINEERING SERVICES AT ALTA LOMA PARR IN THE AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $8,000.00
G. REQUEST BY BRUCE CHITIEA TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING MATTER OF DIRECT ELECTION OF MAYOR
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
B. ADJOURNMENT
40, 11 TOE b AN75 •AhCM CUCAMONGA PAGE 1
—P ITEM uE!CR wARka 4AkR.AM1.
___________________________________ __________ ____________ _____ ____
A. CMECRA UVERIAP
,TV—P11AOC FORUM 3EMINA9 L. CATE 5122/e4 11568. -66.00
i76 RO.EAI kI22u
184 CO CF SAN otkhmR"N_
398 hAliGNAL 1.01 1 A,,- ,;4:I -h
3C0 SAN GLwNhhLlhL Lt. n L�L,n
397 L04kES GEUGLIC SERII'ES
380 U. S. PL6IMA 'lid
309 8 OAL16h 6LLA5ELLtn
396 CRO+ELL IM�U,TFIL,
iA5 ]IAIc CLh Y_A,AIILR Il.a r„NL
141 UYIItC CEhl"L .a A:.n In -,t,.
392 CALIFORNIA FLLLkAL
391 GREAT wESTtNN
6G9 "ILA,. ihAMbh
391 GREAT wt>TLnk
14 ACTION In AwkL ALt..,1
ab, DEP1 OF MLIL. >_FILLL,
367 LEAGUE uF LALII Cl Tika
.0 CALIF GENIAL >E.viLc
173 MAR20R AOMIh1ST,AIO, S
779 RAISER FLUhGATIL;' rLALIh
10 A C w llw6 SLAV_:
3 A -1 LINEN
6 ACE GkIICE SUiPLIii
22 AM PUbIIL LM15 Ai >LL
379 AMBROSE, .E9:.Y
353 ANGELS nUHL IM,.ulCM_61
352 AP&SILLIC INUTH A,AG,Ml
29 8 E M ELECIRIC
33 BASELINE hAk OWAAE
35 BEAM GULCH 11AL >LFVILk
186 BEORGSIAh, HLTLr
964 BLSGL., Ilr.
157 bELLAM7, ItAkl L
9 BRUMING
.M -11, , /.9 /,4
LLL LiC_n i.S 5 /31 /S4
nt n_L.:M.P
n[ „ndlL. Ftl
�L65 C17AA1 SF AY
n.,lA.a /uAHFk Ud
V Lc l LA 1 ILN
Y E.LCI
!_Lt
L.YlS Tf In.I.nCI
lnY[.1'+Ln V F4A
rc 111 CA ,b
ILV a: iMtNTIFCA
;.f _lA fc JlN
3uNt
JLNE
i W,C
\:1lac mnjD
1:111860SUPFL CENTER
I E -L SUPILIcS
IQ ACC SiLNT
6: LaC[ uF IYi:
,i hl; wrYl l_:
..'.L �Ai ILI11 nc nl Al
L1 UIT!
lEl
Ea
ni Ai YwIM
r,
MAIhi `c
I15T i< -54.40
11575
IISTS
11576
1157h 73(.LC
1151kw 4c.W
31si9e 5.00
l i3_C+ 522.5C
C LLdn fIE Ya 11591' 7C(.LC
11562. 2e .5fi
t lse 7. s,loz. el
I
IEicw 2,145.4:
'_BN 15GC,OOO.OG
u5ar•: 15 LC ,o4e.ee
E LI 6cN Tic Y.> Iln9e• - 55k.45
. 1:91
Iltso 115 E�291.25
. 24C.00
11,91 C
11592. 3” GC.rc
1159 1,942.34
115941. . "S I.ili.21
115W 5,•,21.3r
115921 - 13
135t147 l
L.LD
C OTHER
ITEMS
13t(B
162.00
i. CIbE6
HEMS
13W)
38!.21
13'7L
41.55
13571
L7.2r
1 "7,
15,.6L
1357a
13574
130.51
L ..I nEA
I1EHS
1 >0b
20 .tk
E L11¢N
Ilina
13576
55.21
33'.77
2,54C.GG
lit?_
151.21
13'_79
I9.CL
._. -_
LL.00
ANN
.,ate.,... _.
6 -20-04 Llil W wwwA.nle
11411_1.1.
.u[Alwru
111.[ ,
PETE[
:1 C• _ ._
nAnwa
w4rf•.4u1.
53
C 6 il(61ME[MI11G
_LLIn..Lt >; nvl LE:
1 ?:!1
.,5(t.LL
92
CAllfl"IA JLUAN4L
__L .LLI:l:. 1.
1:r,!:
22.CC
U.
CMAX:in LC _..1.1.11_1.
Jb:.;
11, Ir:
IItI,
1P
i,l ): ,LO
545
CW LAnwLIE11 .r _rr
it
IIr.41
74
CI1T MLMIA,
a.o.i w =•.IA.
I-ttS
3'.!C
61
CLA6[MIBI eUlin 1 1 . 1 •L71ANI
u • ;I,i "411141.. U:1
13 =c1
74.ce
329
CLAPA 60Aw VA(. . , ILI
A[n_u'IL 1+
13f[I
5I.t4
567
COOLiS4 .3111 M. :...(. \l .r l4
ni�..L
1_u:
11,.39
Sf:
COPE TILL :L11c
I) "i
?Ir.s'
d3
CGVIKG16N 1 -
I. A
13". ).
a,t Lk.7,
09
C11CAM30" C3�..A1,1. .1-1
:.Hdl 1.•.1lc'u,. E
_II[F
011:
I1<.sl
1,13!.41
67
COCMwMC4 Y..1111:11[
, L nl._ ;. IU1h.
Ir a>
,IL +:
1:: ).
:,111.54
92
DAILY wl PGel
111_:1 n <AI.
}C).
L..:(.
355
DAMIi I! li••l
It,
Gi Fbl» .G..n. _ -.. ..
IS :1`::> _
In -.
L<•':
ILccr
11.4'.4.1:
561
Ot ILr
•1 _.n \"l1. .�.
1'')f
:1.,[
96
f1F18. If 511x1.5 -1 _.. n.
vu 1 -1I MA I >1
13:sl =
75,34
117
EMPE7, 11111!
.l .[
1Jts'
711.1(
151
MA. u,ra na .b.
1.1 _
olltr
Iia_'+e
Iea.S)
a,7)i.L.
331
A Ji
7X[ GFMA
TOL
I.1 :� _.rY :t :_:
131:(
44. L•
ate
li 1101.7 ta._ _C
at.ol i.._
131 (1
r.3(').L•
142
WA.Z..:1411
Gil, r
131;.
l!C.CC'
153
Gia IGA>G1114G CI.1_ E \.[ \taus
S.A,__.il :wnl 1111. MGw_
13af?
143
6XA111, x111 n
J..r._
I
I4i. i0
33i
""AnG 6G]I11a4: 6t.ILw
I.O.TkL r.A1LM1Al
1311.5
171.17
347
MILL. 5:1:11[ C, h
.- -SA
IiL o
Ir•Lt.([
414
1»
FGLL11, wILLIA1 L.
1:1,2
.:i
158
NOIIIGAI or;J:A CJ., II._.
ALN.AL7 ^_
Cl/cF
11@4
13(C)
1,154.5:
Ill
S.M. NL)1 LJK[_n w
:..I.J .JrPl l_, L
Ii /.F
lltl+
13111
P, .3(
363
1511
.1.I :1.:•1 _
_It[l.
;TE-S
IStl1
I,aU .34
34C
SIIA KA
., - N _ :MITT
1311.
17-1.:( [C
ICS
(1111 41111 VIN- .IIr 'I ....
r.; .4A i l... .4
.I lr
Il.t,
?'. 1?
1•t.!i
ALS
JLFiLY 11.11. .._.
L__..., l_. ._.... _
,L..
:I S
::f 34
1 :'il: ca
193
LAIPG CCr.i1.L_ll.• --
-��. =11_
017!
1+,17 ?.1(
5_4
LAM JALA
_.. _
IaL
1Y7
ICA.A..[ Lr - A11•:111.14
.c
'.:r.r
11:',
13111
513
IEIGN7C.L A.-I z:AII., :_
f.�: -I ..n _
.Ili.•
ill,
1 1..1_
5G
1111Y111[- :a.t nom. _ A'._1 -ALL -
,CC
I.C. was Ll, IINI
- •'I.
a
:5s.L;
607
N C N bfl l : =a :el if G, .1 -,
• C;1_•
•
•
i�
1 •
•
_ 64M:
6-20 -04 L46 NARPAk1S
_
CHAPMAN�___
iRUCiION
337 MILLERS 8U /PU51
061 NEINORM COMMUNICATIONS
10M LLDID R
W 1lljC1MIG
IFIC CONNENCIAL bROMERAGE
FIC PAODYCTS, INC
202 PAS C.APh1.1
401 PAIIUA•S SALLS LL.P
248 PEA PUG
310 A J PELAEO
2B PONA DISTRILIYIINL CL
101- MAC
375 PFIci CCMPANI
it$ RAMCh.. u1SP:.AL
233 RAPID NIA, INC
223 RECFEAIICN SY SILM., IN-
384 RESCU- kuCHA
274 JANICE NEINLLCS
112 RITZ .ANEkA
276 RIVERSIDE at ,(P61,1
343 RIVERSIDE CGNS1. CUMFAI,l
278 ROININI RIIAU
309 RODEO PR1M7EhS
-321 -- NOMCO GAY ..ALL
524 NOG/. LESLIE C
361 SAN LLNNAYYInL :L. 51Ln IFr'
303 SAM bc&mAGINL CO. SLr VF`WJn
306 SAN be kMARLIkc CO. IkAh,
23% SAN 8kRkAFOINL G.uhll
132 SAN DIECC kLIAFY :KVLI �1, IN-
ISY SCAY
351 SNIPLIY rb.I u:.n s:nl3
320 SOUINE kk LALli. L49YS:.All NCr I.
317 SOUIN"M CALIFUnNIA EYI.Jh LJ.
311 SOUIhc NII CNLIFOMNIA LU11,.. CY.
317 SOU7hENM C.11FUAh14 EJI,U.. C'
;II SWINLNN LALIFOkNIA (CISLI. .(.
SI9 SOUlnt&N C�LIIU.NIA .AS C.,M••N3
322 SPARALEIIS
O11Ch0 CLKAMOAGA PAGE 3
IIEM U.SCF
NINUIL LOOKS
C OIhEF
ITEMS
.kFuN. C::NSI rkk 1145
13124
32..10
Nk FLAG S•'t CIAL IVkNIS
Pt.Mll
1.
JUNE
131.
29
3129-9/7
60.50
13429
Vt NICLk MA1N71
C 61"LA
ITEMS
u4L1 RENTAL
146.35
13132
Yaln� SUPPLIES
13133
-.6C
1b 1I.1 >UleLlti
9,352.76
1h 35
tunLUF
J-h
55.05
M FniF Pi Ai
111.75
136:9
n.k JNY
131.39
: 5,t 95.00
Nu
9L.5C
:3141
45..1.1
h 4i
3i.tt
13(1J
.LAC
13f95
:L °iul u. S(nVlllcn
= tlhE.
HEMS
nEL TILL ob11. rANa
353.73
1 ?547
.LFIPE UNCEN 'INK
131 4c
I,bll .1.l
Y.l. -IL :Ij:I J4
:IhCF
ITC S
hIN1SIlI,: IA[LLl uln
JNIn
IILuS
131.52
E Llhlh
IIErk
JCL b444
13!51
651.40
JuYk
ILL .CI
13'51
L,rrkI17Lk hU115EF5
13t51
744.34
AEELI:C ?rt
211.29
1_•:35
356 .11.
11: cc
lS,E39.t7
J. n.
7'.47
1394<
S4FVt 1'.n UY:aTtS
AuMttY.iAl ��-b11
il'r II1n115
=y.LYS
rlm I,a
ak e MAR .1
JLA \LA AVt
L Jln(k
IIEM:
flhiM
11ibS
.N .. G.IcAL. -•F
::I btF
IIEnS
Gel 4{1.. fA n.
.h to
ill tS
n lh {Al^
3
k4Pks
U322
331.41
13523
250.00
13124
32..10
13625
21.00
1.
1
.46
131.
29
134629 2b
60.50
13429
9.55 -
1301
13.5.1
21131
146.35
13132
9.71
13133
-.6C
134:4
9,352.76
1h 35
33C.L0
J-h
55.05
131 37
111.75
136:9
174.97
131.39
: 5,t 95.00
1344[
9L.5C
:3141
45..1.1
h 4i
3i.tt
13(1J
33(.59
13f95
i, C.CC
13t45
2C 263.00
134-47
353.73
1 ?547
E.CS
131 4c
I,bll .1.l
13(11
?1.,341.00
13t91
41.37
1151
274.94
131.52
IEt.41
1:t;3
72.06
13!51
651.40
13t5:
ILL .CI
13'51
3.99(.55
13t51
744.34
13-50
211.29
1_•:35
356 .11.
11: cc
lS,E39.t7
l _...1
7'.47
1394<
54.45
•
I. •
i
1�
A %YiAN i.
6 -20-44 LIST W rA.RANI. hAhChO CUCAMOhCA PACE 5
PAYEE
tIU e1:CF
eAkkb
nA.N.AMI.
1 — i---------------------_-_____-__________`____-__________-____
__- ______- ___-
__----
_- __- - - - - -.
SSO
STATIONERS CORPLMAIIUh
.kEl`E iUPPIILS a
GThE6 11kM3
136ti
666.63
_U.
_
STEVi•S ML6II
Enl..n; r.l
131(5
3.6E
c21
lhOMA1 11"U"hik.
clliu.cu
c1nlA Illh:
lilts
.15.75
i67
GE PI 01 lh:NSIO61al.,h
>L.aal> L
,:IhEm 11 in>
131,t
It
364
- TROPNY CASE
cIG ...ELL C
LINER I1EMi
13617
119.46
22S
TURLEM), 1hG
ek1,1_Lk nAINI
13666
59.59
653
UMISTFUT LJS ANGtLE>
tAIhl SLIPLII:
13tt9
3,96C.5t
324
USi Pki KRII,
uPUN: •..1 Pl- L,:
I'd 7(
1,(((.LC
476
CAwL "h11 lL
ua.a w +n l,n _
; Ibin Ilih,
11..71
..C72.Ct
346
NEST __A_7 an_.,. 1.1;
`.a t•. ;n av
13,12
347
WEST POINT J.LL >IFIE i, INC
•Lhu LE MAIST
13(73
56.79
629
WE SIL ww lnnlC Al llsh Su",,
13115
132.9[
362
NARY 441116,[
n(Nelt> 6 /l /e5
13675
55.00
3915-0.
ATLLILE:$ ",it h 111,L
.. .. U't
1317,
21.91
a,A
_ _.
.. ._,
1351T
;,175.66
a66
S1ANL.T Tali...
_,h.l _. 11-!
1'.17,
6(l.L(
370
YUSOw GIS:a,'_al 1ihV1_1
ShanlEG> I111>6
13,74
7C.00
iJ1AL ChLCKi
5655,255.63
•
L*
;6•
I�
. �4•
I�
l I'�
• 1 •
COPY__- - ..� w --
1LPW"T1pM M SLEONOIR LROMSE
T., N AkWFFk' Cwwal
1101 •R9S -w �� � zw
Sww. CNR.9lIS _�.,�•......,
n..IrrwM RIIRSI RSIaw ti
Isr AeYM�AISwA
I. TYMSI Of LICE4"s)
111E t -%
OS SLL19 Un a W=
lArM MACS
el D.lw ljls ce C
"'Mdit
1Y1
Cp% i6I�I[f
oRro
IN.M
z ra.AwA or A/MICAN1131
wN. Iw.N i
EMa,.. ON.,o -1sA:
Ea. value S.
S. IY1MS1 Of r4NS CCT*"m51
•
12 , AyN:[wn eEr.w lal rM1w errr rnmw.r .-N.rd •n en -.Nw Ircwn.d w.^'•.n rll Ap•. all M. pwliR[eno-n el a IrtenNw, aM
LX.
rT1E
bl rM M -11 •w .yNr. w <wn. w ywwir ro I. •rNwN wn N M. C-Il l Arr
Ee. m.
q. STAR Or CALIFORMA -- .0.N. 5-29. E 4
S
fso.oa
u
•Nw r �wT W
•w•ww Yrc1 -.
-•n •••.,w.w• w ew, ••.w r r wren
w,w, w•
CT EO
mm.t r M +r„ww w n
rn w -Mn •Y +r•Iw Trr•w• W n• Y•.n+w. y['��w
r [ ICAN
I. aOMIE. �.
♦ N
/IM+A. mlN
SIn Iltr .... .....T.. .............._,
SIGN NOR ---- ct�..rL----- :� :__. ... %'...11 -:` .............. SSES�aIr�
qf------------------ ...... ..............�.... -.RI. -------------------
E Lw N «e SAAw
21w YAA11NR
I{
M=M= 91701 - EY CE90AP m
TOTAL
1150.00
&.0p 1 N Pr. I. N
•MIICATION EI 1111NE/ERCA�PIV411LtA_Q
IS STALE Of CALIFORNIA Cwory N..JN.EWWM--- _........ . OaN.,, S.'• ^ ^li��,d11.A�....._.........
•./•,w w w rww� _.n r .••w i,r. y.ln+.. r �.••n• r r.w.,w a ..•n,rww • ....n. .nr,w •rr•....r., w . a..•_ ., n•v ..
IA, W ,).f LrnnNNtl 17 SpnwurNO el /UtmNNtl _ '! 4t.m. Nr Ill
A > . J9wwtb C. fl.•r.. 7jjL �i `t; ?.'„ .. 41- 119913
I9, lwAMn Mrn,1.r RM SIr9N
Cry RM vp Co ceur,ry
19 V. Na IS'ritt SNRr TMF E.AFF< far OMNIIInO Uw ONE
AMRMRS, RwwSN woo,
-C M0..w1 -wa
❑ _________________JAM= - _.__._.__..____..__COMES MAEN .............. .. .... ... ...... ..............
s -H-Ba
❑EMNNRAMM ......... JIM w ......... _ ..................OM � .............. EwwSl Alw .... .............
..__.
/ aa�MU w.a
E. A1w4M AdMw fl aIRrIMI Mrrn S)-Nrwaw AAd U. r.rr, r.wwl
slue vcnM.
f ILA.. Yen r•ar Mn tamewA N e Nlwrl 10 NnA rw, A•w .r.IFIA1 wry N aIa PanAwrF N M AkNNOt
9wwa9A [amN An w rTM^^ N M OpwwNw Ow.
Jo wnnyro M. Am
11 [glwn a "RS" .n.wr N:NN.9 w 10 w an wl.tMnwn wl,•tl, JrNI M a..NM RAn N Hn• epplrcanw
•
12 , AyN:[wn eEr.w lal rM1w errr rnmw.r .-N.rd •n en -.Nw Ircwn.d w.^'•.n rll Ap•. all M. pwliR[eno-n el a IrtenNw, aM
bl rM M -11 •w .yNr. w <wn. w ywwir ro I. •rNwN wn N M. C-Il l Arr
q. STAR Or CALIFORMA -- .0.N. 5-29. E 4
�n
•Nw r �wT W
•w•ww Yrc1 -.
-•n •••.,w.w• w ew, ••.w r r wren
w,w, w•
w •�•,r. rw• w•r r•r• w iwww w , mm • r ,..r.w
��r w ••M,w•• •., w•n.w .wr
n
• •u., r wwlw T.•+n w n rrn• w • �� nn
mm.t r M +r„ww w n
rn w -Mn •Y +r•Iw Trr•w• W n• Y•.n+w. y['��w
r [ ICAN
I. aOMIE. �.
SIn Iltr .... .....T.. .............._,
SIGN NOR ---- ct�..rL----- :� :__. ... %'...11 -:` .............. SSES�aIr�
qf------------------ ...... ..............�.... -.RI. -------------------
•MIICATION EI 1111NE/ERCA�PIV411LtA_Q
IS STALE Of CALIFORNIA Cwory N..JN.EWWM--- _........ . OaN.,, S.'• ^ ^li��,d11.A�....._.........
•./•,w w w rww� _.n r .••w i,r. y.ln+.. r �.••n• r r.w.,w a ..•n,rww • ....n. .nr,w •rr•....r., w . a..•_ ., n•v ..
IA, W ,).f LrnnNNtl 17 SpnwurNO el /UtmNNtl _ '! 4t.m. Nr Ill
A > . J9wwtb C. fl.•r.. 7jjL �i `t; ?.'„ .. 41- 119913
I9, lwAMn Mrn,1.r RM SIr9N
Cry RM vp Co ceur,ry
19 V. Na IS'ritt SNRr TMF E.AFF< far OMNIIInO Uw ONE
AMRMRS, RwwSN woo,
-C M0..w1 -wa
❑ _________________JAM= - _.__._.__..____..__COMES MAEN .............. .. .... ... ...... ..............
s -H-Ba
❑EMNNRAMM ......... JIM w ......... _ ..................OM � .............. EwwSl Alw .... .............
..__.
/ aa�MU w.a
CJLX
CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
016MDENAVENUE, F.0.90 %4Q GLENDALE. CALIFORNIA 91109 • (21312406=
f E6a1VEI
CITY CF RANCHO CUCAWWA
' . GMINISfR�ADTo10lN
May 30, 1984 MAY
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REpUENEII .,.1.0_o.w=
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall !
City Clerk
Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730
RE: Our File 4A2 -11324
Assured . HALL, Henry a Betty
Date of Loss 5 -9 -84
Your Assured City of Rancho Cucamonga
As a result of the above captioned accident our insured
vehicle sustained a collision loss in the amount of $4,153.50.
• Our investigation indicates that the cause of this accident is
a result of malfunction traffic signals.
Our insured vehicle has now been repaired and we hereby make
demand on you in the above amount, of which our insured has
deductible interest. Enclosed find copy of final repair bill
and the accident report, and substantiate our claim.
May we have your prompt acknowledgement of this letter advising
us as to your intended disposition of this claim.
Yours very truly,
CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
RIC C;�BRAL
CLAIMS REPRESENTATIVE
MH /ml
•
(a
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT Rol �.
_1
TRAFFIC COLLISION COOING •.`.-,
.. a 7a;
° -•'— "' -' PROPERTY DAMAGE
rCM"'
i
DIAGRAM �..
INJUREDAVITNESSESIPASSENOERS ...,
�.
NARRATIVEMOLEMENTAL
www .w
INII M
NAZIIIATI V EMMLEMENTAL
.N
Nn w w.r111.wr
N.
..w I.M
w N.N.
.wu •1.
1-12
/1
NARRATIVEM"LEMENTAL
w r ww�•. nw•.r
•••
ww �
r.w•
.•..w• u
w•.
12616 1 -11
Y..l.ww• /,a•.w.. YM...w
.w.r• Y.wwtNU.
•.... w.u•
wM. /wY•n
I Nr
AUTO E CTICNI
TE 1170E RAMOPM� M 2O7 • EL AMTS, CA 91732
_ _ TELEPHOlWfE1519-M14 w2E1E
GUIM W.
TOTAL LOtt ttf'ORT
_U,
•
•
L - - . I
MN BAISOM
AWO'Wgv Ay uW
424 TAO " IWO ITRTR
2 l W 66ACH. CAU"'.lA 10802
12,21 .3a�216,
3
4 If
C,Ltel-13
(VACSSMOWMaYRAMOTAMPOny,
a 19 C I T E I
C OF RAKIIO CMANONGA
ADMINISTRAT.ON
nl%l All
Sect__.. K" of t:*-e rA-rernment Cole
STAT-- CT
TY rA\1 3"
aCa—nSt; the STATZ 17
.:==—A ':A:, 7%N:7.1'
rn-' Coct Tf�Ts a�dress P-e as
was larked On eaj�7z -s-44a Of -4,3d, i.-. the Ci_"
:L&r.c,.-.o Cucamonga, driven :,y ona, .. . ...
3
Fuber, and trava-iJ.'-q in an aazzar-y Qireczlon 0'.".
6
struck her and CSulad "or -jn4UZ?- At td zlila of M..0
7
aCC-jde- tha C-a*--ant 445 a drop A c":3
8.,
county of San M-aznardino -i*--==y Look drop, 1-5 -Oz:mz--' Z'-
91
9:91 Baseline Ro.,Z, cilzlt a! ohO Cucamonga, Co,=ty Of Sin
10�
Bernardino. cla_�--ant naintains t%&t WCa-d n0z
occ,..rred but for z'.,..- Z.sign, AndlQZ C0nsZ--%;cziz--. of
:.2
-rzz
.AO&-4, w..iz'-. did za:ze t-
zy of San BaxLx4-0 =gry 1Oz3z4d w:z ni--
=-.a Co;::. ..
I
City of lancho C,.;CjxnOnqz Invited-, to PAX41, Z*.-.4-1z cc.=
i.0catzon.
and dzz? theiz ".r02 -'ocaz4--
r.Q= CCUX a� t.
the r � 4- -.a CZL.".L`
San Bern&rdino, Branch !QC-'zdQ in the CimY 04
C,.Lca=n;a had not placad Gn aria: a
so as to Invita persons to ax-"Sa-, to
Claimant Is ::alidvas Z.,-.az z.,.a
bil;,ty for Basa--'..a
the City Of Rancho *--Ias WLM'n tha STATZ
cr
CAL:?OtN:A ACA:. -RAMS; or
CUCX:C.N,3.;. that t'.-.a raszonsibilit7 !0.- c0n&:-'.Cz-
26
an 15L 2&36'-�na
...q, maintaining, designing zh4 book CrO2 locaza4 at S
26
Road lies wit: the Cow.ty of San 2arnardina Branch Library S•jtu
Finally, clairAnt is and believes that the City Of
Rancho Cucamonga is for the necessary license,
:a /or pareission ii. order :or --'-a Co•.::.cy o: Sae
raintain a took drop at i:s: Bass* i: a 7.caa.
5. As a dirbct a:.d 2rcxiaa8 rasalt of t::a
.,
aesiga, .-taintena:.CS, a:.: /o: coaitr;:ctio: o: 3aseline Z:,_.:.. -... _.._
:g by _..a Coc:.ty o: S.::. Sa.tard_ao of a book dro_ .--
5:9: 3asa:i:e dOAQ, a:a ::.a co:ai:ea acts ana condtct i.: _..�
.i
7.
parties re:tionad, _..c__a_:g S ^.:+:..,. Ca7.::C3S:,, lCAL . \S:,
c
CCGS:Y C7 SA:: 3Z?S:.d::SG, C :.y C: i:.CC:.0 CCCAXGSC,A a:. G S
S
t:.roi:gh 25, :SC:XS:vz. ::a in '.....
.r
approxiwata a.o:-:n of 5�- J,JVO.VU.
u. is jr3;a :t:,/ :gnora nt o!° the ::i a :a.mas
_�
•..... _aa:.ti Ciai v. 3sia ra sl.:ad:.:; :G-S t:.roL'g:, 25, .:.C..3 LVi
and t.:a:a_ore c:ur.a age_: s: sai_ Da'_aac...as by scc:: fic__ciou
_.
.... as. C:aiaa.:t ra;arvas : a :.ght to a:..e :G this claim
:-
;asagca: t conp:ai:.t p- :;ca:t .e Sac :-o. 474 o:- tha Code os C.v_: '
_.
?rocadure w a: tha mane are k naw to c:ai:.aat.
:^
7. c. ail.._..: „_,._ -; t..a :o::owi ng da.:ayao
: a rata o: prase ::a:ic.. c:
....
!31 '.•3r.._ �=. :raga
:y.
: - root =4 a:_ ..:..._ s ac..,_ ..... _
s
24
ac_ V..._ :g to proof.
p
k:
24
doll ii aarcl" if Y4
27
A torney for Claimaac
!BRCO? OF SER4:CE ST Y.AII - 10-13a,2015.3 C.C.p.)
S STATE OF CALIFORS:A )
M ;SS. •
4. CCL'N= OF LO8 X\GEIW3 )
r.^ . res_dent c° /trc- ye°_ _n the CO'-'tY a`^resaid; : ain o:•er'.•.
if e_chteen years ene n_t a ?arty to he within gnt :_ee
. r ^•_ ^ ^: :^.y *esc -hews atC =esa _a:
7aat C _rd ?freer :,Onc ?each. Ca- 'i!or^'a. 9"C2
".^ _. ••� -_ -y �_� 04 _ served the with: •-• -
..
_XAA57S Section 010 of _ Gw?ernnent node )'
�ntereqted ..a_u-e
.. .. sa_c. aC.C^. -.. by ?1ac_n: a __ a cO?V thereof enclosed is a
• . ____. _....__^l With ^e -a ^a _hereon 82_.y 7rsDt d, _n the
...__- States =,-.41 at �?�.. ]each. Cal"arn'a
..._ +sae? a. `---=�`" ` •
-q.^^
- -r "-
trvi 1-1-,
__ .... _... -
/2
SdLLIA A. 11I�
Ll
Ll
Ll
1 STAFF REPORT ��44b
't
F
DATE: June 20, 1984 - 1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Kral], Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 8179 and Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement from Ted Mayhew for his project located
at the northwest corner of Acacia Street and Cottage Avenue
The subject map located at the northwest corner of Acacia Street and Cottage
Avenue was approved by Planning Commission on October 12, 1983 for the
division of 1.01 acres of land into 2 parcels within Subarea 4 of the
Industrial Specific Plan.
As a condition of approval, a lien agreement for the future paving of the
alley is also attached for Council approval.
Street improvements will be constructed at time of developmet of each parcel.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
Parcel Map 8179 and the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
and authorizing the Mayor an City Clerk to sign same and cause same to be
recorded.
Respectfully submfi;,ed,
g
I: LB as
Attachments
19
•
•
Y
W
reNTArIve,
PARCEL MAP NO 8179
/N THE F/rr a- RANCHO Ef/EAAIDNGA
OfvFrarN
t/a.wF •IMO°rcn awzwalom u, w,,t T. /I,N NW
t
n �U[u
a.�
L 01)', 4 4 Rp lyprtgylJ KN
IYI.KCM[fOW/M'
utlY
T. Afl16.Y/J. KCMJIW .rN
rNrYNarO.
T.WMy
fal. /r to ?A4(/RNNN.
NYYpNr yn y,lr yNU ralanm., YN,M
mra rrFNrtr.a,.rfNr NmNrsy l.r
BM SrNEEr
_
su'
f
N
s
/�� w /Y/
FX /ST /NG NES /DENT /dc
y7o
OWEtt/N6S
�T
Y.rnY
Y
W
rr.I.I,rt
h�
3�
PARCEL
N
(ml NILN[ CMII/
PARCEL 2
/uNIYMOK0' i
AIXII ME
T\
VAEANr
EX /Sr FESENVO/A �w NA. ..Iwr ,w
ur L,F, ttWIIN{t
n is rtN Y�rr�Y fy rcnN Tatw.art
lr��+�rtr.Y LnYriiwl s /MIJr��' �l
m-- �'i4i' YYr m wrM T� wr.M m iU.rl
Ylpl /Y WN
YYr
ao
V
l
U
sNEEr / CF/
... MI
�NfY /NEF �
.Y Mf�Y
2
O
O
u�
N yl
k O
WZ
u
i
t
r. YYN.Y
LENEND
-- Orwrrl r•aprrYY
ice. wrY.m N..I.w rn.nanr
m rwr. war
.oTI+N.eH h
Dill rv�.rfN IRNrI1Ir�
J �
�\
P
ao
V
l
U
sNEEr / CF/
... MI
�NfY /NEF �
.Y Mf�Y
2
O
O
u�
N yl
k O
WZ
u
i
t
r. YYN.Y
LENEND
-- Orwrrl r•aprrYY
ice. wrY.m N..I.w rn.nanr
m rwr. war
.oTI+N.eH h
Dill rv�.rfN IRNrI1Ir�
N
page
r�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
im
VICINITY MAP
N
page
r�
0
RECORDING REQUESTED !Y:
and
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF,RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P. 0. Box 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91770
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this_ day
of ?r A.., 19,614 , by and between Edward L.
Mayhew (hereinafter referred to as 'Developer-), and the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation
(hereinafter referred to as 'City'), provides as follows:
WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the
recordation of Parcel Map 8179 the City requires the construction
• of improvement of north /south alley located on the west adjacent
to the property to be developed; and
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone constriction
of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the
City; and
WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement
provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring
the Developer to construct said improvement, at no expense to the
City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement
shall also provide that the City may construct said improvement
if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City
shay. have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as
security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due
City.
19
0
r"mw z 1
0
NOM, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE:
1. The Developer hereby agrees that he will install The
improvement of the north /south alley on the west side of the
property in accordance and compliance with all applicable
ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in
effect at the time of the Installation. Said Improvement shall
be installed upon and along said alley.
2. The installation of said improvement shall be
completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to
the Developer from the City to commence installation of the
same. Installation of said improvments shall be at no expense to
the City.
7. In the event the Developer shall fail or refuse to
complete the installation of said improvement in a timely manner, •
City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer
written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property
hereinafter described and complete said improvement and recover
411 costs of completion incurred by the City from the
Developer. Each parcel created by recordation of said map shall
be subject to a prorated amount on a per acre basis.
4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the
terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the
repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in
completing said Improvement upon default by the Developer
hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain,
sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described
real property situated in the City of lancho Cucamonga, County of
San 8errardioo, State of California, to -wit:
Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 8129 as recorded in Book
Pages of Parcel Maps, records of San ernar no•
County, a orn a PN 209 - 192 -13 thru 18)
2
0
•
5. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes
described above.
6. Now, therefore, if the Oeveloper shall faithfully
perform all of the acts and things to be done under this
Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it
shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall
be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and
the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto
shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the
State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining
to mortgages on real property.
7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall Inure
to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto.
a. To the extent required to give effect of this
Agreement as a mart gage, the term 'Developer' shall be
•mortgagor" and the Oity shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms
are used in the the Civil Code Of the State of California and any
other statute pertaining to mortages on real property.
9, if legal action is commenced to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City
Is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to
foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable
attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court.
of 7
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed
this Agreement on the day and year first above written.
AKE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, a municipal
corporation
By:
On J. mlxe is
Mayor
ATTEST
DEVELOPER
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk �
................ I................. u. u. u.. a............ • •... e
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) $s
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
On ,I9__,before
me
the under signed Notary- PubTIC, personaTly dppeafed -jCFN -9.RI-KTLS,
Personally known to me to be the Mayor of the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me
to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of .
said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such
municipal corporation executed it.
WITNESS MY NANO AND OFFICIAL SEAL
OENlgwL a1CNNOWL[tIOMENT
r_
. ecoaen
NOr
gnea arr eu0uc Oersananv aoceare0 _
�r'oe,eocanvxoow�io me -�
Drone m me On Ina Oaaa er aaneperOrY "w
m pe me ean.. penon�ef wnwe �/mq/s
minm inebumenl. an0 a<xnOw4a9ea Tit --- _,fuplcnp"0l0lne
WrtNE55 mY none aye afhcw "ea, 4x¢Weml
q;-,. r, ,a--
.....................
a, Nd[ary al9nature
NOTE:Nfl EN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP,
THE ABOVE ACXNOWLEGEMEBT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A •
CORPORATION /PARfWfrfffrrXCFN�BTILEGENENT IS REQUIRED.
r. �s
sent
SHO'NALTER
. ecoaen
NOr
gnea arr eu0uc Oersananv aoceare0 _
�r'oe,eocanvxoow�io me -�
Drone m me On Ina Oaaa er aaneperOrY "w
m pe me ean.. penon�ef wnwe �/mq/s
minm inebumenl. an0 a<xnOw4a9ea Tit --- _,fuplcnp"0l0lne
WrtNE55 mY none aye afhcw "ea, 4x¢Weml
q;-,. r, ,a--
.....................
a, Nd[ary al9nature
NOTE:Nfl EN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP,
THE ABOVE ACXNOWLEGEMEBT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A •
CORPORATION /PARfWfrfffrrXCFN�BTILEGENENT IS REQUIRED.
r. �s
L
RESOLUTION NO. 06- -217-'OrCR 8z/— /`75'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8179
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8179)
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8719, submitted by Edward L.
Mayhew, and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the northwest corner of Acacia
Street and Cottage Avenue, being a division of Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and
East 1/2 of the adjoining alley, all in Block 2 of Lucas Subdivision was
approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 3179 is the final map of the division of
land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8179 be and the same
is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
• AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authe et, City Clerk
jaa
Jon D. Mt a s, Mayor
.z 6
RESOLUTION NO._Ofi.24-91'CR ey — X7(0
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM EDWARD L. MAYHEW AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
WHEREAS, installation of and pavement established as prerequisite to
recordation of Parcel Map 8179 has been met by entry into a Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Edward L. Mayhew.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authe et, City Cler
jaa
J
Jon i e s, Mayor
.27
•
is
E
1l nc n.. \rnvn 11 111 vnaln.
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Relase of Bonds and Notice Completion
H-
Tract 10277 -1 - located on Carnelian Street South of Almond Street
SURETY: Chino Valley Bank
255 N. Euclid
Ontario, California 91762
Release Portion of Letter of Credit:
Faithful Performance (Road) $15,000.00
077,
The street improvements have been completed in accordance with the
approved plans and it is recommended that the original Letter of Credit
be reduced from $46,000.00 to $31,000.00. The #31,000.00 will be held to
guarantee the Labor and Materials portion of the project. After six
months the remaining monies will be released.
Sapphire Street Sidewalk Improvements
CONTRACTOR: Tri City Construction
P. 0. Box 511
Alta Loma, California 91701
Release of Labor and Materials Bond $15.451.15
Six months have passed since the Faithful Performance Bond was released
and it is recommended since no claims have been filed that the Labor and
Materials Bonds be released.
.� 2
City Council Staff Report
Bond Releases
June 20, 1984
Page 2
n
LJ
Michael J's Restaurant - located on the Southeast corner of Foothill
Blvd. and Turner Avenue
ONMER: Michael J's Restaurants
642 South Second Avenue, Suite 1
Covina, California 91723
Acceptance of Cash Deposit (Maintenance Guarantee) $1,777.00
Release of Certificates of Deposit $59,250.00
$118,550.00
The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the
approved plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the
maintenance guarantee and release the certificates of deposit.
•
•
.),9
is
•
nTm ^n o
STAFF REPORT V_
DATE: June 20, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: Awad of City -Wide Street Tree Service Contract
r
On June 7, 1984, bids yore received for the above - mentioned contract. Three
valid bids were received with United Pacific Corporation, the lowest,
responsible bidder, on unit price comparison (see attached bid summary
sheet). All references are satifactory and have demonstrated their ability to
perform the contract.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council award the City -Wide Street Tree Service of
Santa Fe Springs for a unit price bid of $2,222.75.
Resp ctfully submit d,
J
LB :OL.jaa
Attachment
30
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT: Citywide Street Tree Service Contract
LOCATION: N/A
ITEMS
Total Group Charges
Nest Coast
QUANTITIES BID AMOUNT
(3,693.00
United Pacific
BID AMOUNT
$2,222.75
DATE: June 7, 1984
CONTRACT NO. N/A
Davey Service
BID AMOUNT
-D-
t'!
Golden Bear
BID AMOUNT
$4,636.50
CITY -WIDE STREET TREE SERVICE AGREEMENT •
This agreement, made and entered into this day of 19_ by
and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (herein called "City" and
(herein called "Contractor "):
Section 1: The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City,
hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary
to perform and complete, in a good workmanlike manner, the street tree
maintenance in strict accordance with specifications entitled •Citywide Street
Tree Service" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in accordance with the
Contractor are hereby made a part of this contract.
Section 2: The City in consideration of the performance of this contract,
agrees to pay the contractor on a monthly basis for work completed as per
contract proposal for a period of four months beginning Februay 20, 1984.
Section 3. As provided in the specifications, the City shall have the
right during the term of this agreement to review with the Contractor the work
which has been performed. If, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the street
tree service has not be performed in a satisfactory manner the City may, upon
three (3) days notice in writing to the Contractor, cancel this contract. In
the event of cancellation, monies due the Contractor or retained under the
terms of the contract, shall be forfeited to the City, not to exceed the
amount necessary to correct deficiencies in the street tree service. •
Section 4: The Contract shall commence work under this agreement on
February 20, 1984.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this contract as of
the date herein above specified.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:
Mayor
CONTRACTOR
By
III •
3Z
COO C�T`4 POSAI
Citywide Street Tree Service
OF THE CITY DF RANCHO CLICAMONGA; nature 01
TO THE CITY COUNCIL has carefully examined the
that he the special provisions and and hereby
ned bidder declares examine. d instruction to bidders,
The proposed work, that he company�n9
the proposed read the ac- is accepted, to furnish ally Lnethe an
specifications, if this proposal in accordance prescribed for
proposes and agrees,, to complete the said work
required in the time and manneoroSal.
do all the work and Specifications, the following proposal,
Special provisions farth in the schedule on
the unit cost set
1. ITEMIZED BID FORM and in accordance with the
ecific group ht of P. tree, linear
es for atsbreast hei9ht, height
Indicate charges diameter of stump. See Section 4 of Contrac
appropriate tru pruning
and or
feet of root
Proposal,
2, GROUP CHARGES Trunk Diameter �� TOTAL
24 over
0 -12 12 -24 S 27.00 5 71
S 17.00 27.00 1
B. Costrt°�5 S� S 60 0 S 7on�Sa7Sai- S�$S..Siur
A. 0, Cost to Remove S 3
5 25 0r
. E. Cost to Side S 15.0_0
prune Tree Height TOTAL
20' -40' 40' over
Gro�o ?� O 0O S 1.0 S 3
Cost to Raise S 0 34.00
A. � p 51
g, Cost to Trim � 24'.0
C Cost to Remove Trunk Diameter TOTAL
12'24" 24" over 5
0 -12" S 28 00 S 28.00 -
!_o ' 28,00 g5.0
A. Lost to Rase f 8! 70.00 7 0
g, Cost to Top may-- 5r j 4
C. Cost to Trim S 3 5 1 5 0 515
D. Cost to Trim 50.00 20 00 S 00
topping
E, costt to Remove 5 6
F Cost to Remove S `fit �—
(leaving stump
1S" in neig 5 5 0 5'45
G, Cost to Side S
prune
III
33
Group IV Root Pruning
0 -250 251 -500
501 -750 750+ TOTAL
Cost Per Linear
Foot E 4.00 $ 3.00
E 2.50 $ 2.25 S 11.75
•
Group V Stump Removal
0 -12 12 -24
24+ TOTAL
Cost Per Stump S 35.00- 545.00
S 55.00 $135.00
TOTAL GROUP CHARGES 52,222.75
TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED TWENTY -TWO AND 75/100 DOLLARS
Group IV Emergency Charges
Emergency charges shall include all
personnel, equipment and any other
material used in completing work.
A. Minimum service charge shall be
at the rate of
5 120.00 for 2
hours (2 MAN CREW)
B. Charges beyond minimum time shall
be at the rate of
$ 60.00 per hour
(2 MAN CREW)
3. Contract may be extended an additional 12 months for two consecutive years
starting July 1, 1985 and July 1, 1986.
At what percent increase 7 %
(not to exceed 10%)
•
4. TREE GROUPS
Refer to the following groups when
preparing cost for raising, topping
trimming or removing.
Group I Ornamental
Elms
Liquidambar
Crape Myrtle
Cypress
Oaks
Cedar
Camphors
Eucalyptus
Pines
Etc.
Group II Palms
Date
Fan
Queen
Group III Windrow Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus globulus
IV •
3y
• Printed Name of Bidder UNITED PACIFIC CORPORATION
By Laze 6 .Tones
Address of Bidder 12815 E.-Inperial Hightev, Santa Fe Springs, Ca. 90670
Signature of Bidd
B
Tit
Business Address
Name and Address of Member of the Firm
GUS K. FRANKLIN
1531 Pinewood Place
90670
• Incorporated under the laws of the State of California
President Lance B. Jones State License Number 7026.4 C.C.
Secretary Same As Above
Treasurer Same As Above
0 VI
3s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT ��`,MOA,,
• � n
s '
C� r
w
F D Z
=June 1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa, Jr. Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of Annual Contract for Traffic Striping and Pavement Marking
On May 24, 1984, the City Council gave approval for staff to advertise for
bids for the Annual Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services Contract.
Due to the nature of the contract, the competition is very limited. However,
the City was very fortunate to receive three good competitive bids. Attached
for your review is a summary of the bids,
The lowest, reponsible bidder is Safety Striping of Fillmore, California for
• the amount of $71,594.00.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council award the Annual Contract for Traffic
Striping and Pavement Marking to Safety Striping at the bid price of
$71,594.00.
ResA ctfully subm'tted,
AH S:jaa
Attachment
3(j
PROJECT:
ITEMS
TOTAL GROUP CHARGES
W
J
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
Annual Street Striping and Pavement Marking Contract
Safety Striping Pacific Striping
DATE: June 6, 1984
Consley t Montigny
QUANTITIES BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT
$71,594.00 $76,605.00 $93,295.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
CONTRACT FOR STREET STRIPING
AND
PAVEMENT MARKING SERVICES
This Agreement made and entered into this 1st day of July, 1984, by and
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, herein referred
to as "City ", and herein referred
to as "Contractor ".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City desires to provide for street striping and pavement
marking services through a "contract, with an independent contractor, and
received bids for said services; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is advantageous and in the best
interest of the City to enter this Agreement for the retention of said
services; and •
WHEREAS, the City has determined the contractor to be the lowest
responsible bidder for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and
covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1. This Agreement includes and embodies all provisions, terms,
conditions and requirements of those specifications incorporated herein as
Exhibit "A ".
SECTION 2. The terms of the Agreement shall be for the period of July 1,
1984 through June 30, 1987, unless sooner terminated in accordance with
Exhibit "A ", Section III K.
SECTION 3. The contractor hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment,
transportation, labor and materials necessary to perform these tasks as
specified in Exhibit "A ". •
3b
. Pursuant to Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2 of the Labor Code of
the State of California or local laws thereto applicable, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga has ascertained the general prevailing rates for legal holiday and
overtime work in the locality of which this work is to be performed for each
craft, classification or type of workman needed to execute contracts for
public works.
Pursuant to Section 1773 of the Labor Code, the general prevailing rates
of wages in the City of Rancho Cucamonga have been determined and these are
listed in the California Department of Transportation publications General
Prevailing Wage Rates effective on the date of this contract,
SECTION 4. Payment shall be made to the contractor upon completion of
the work, to the satisfaction of the City, and to the requirements of the
attached specifications at the proposed unit prices on a monthly basis.
SECTION 5. The contractor promises and agrees to hold harmless the City
• and its agents, from any and all claims or demands, actions or causes of
action of any kind or nature whatsoever arising hereunder; and the contractor
further promises and agrees to furnish to the City a policy of insurance
issued by a reputable insurance company in the sums stated in Exhibit "A
Section III B.
SECTION 6 It is agreed that should the contractor fail to perform or
otherwise breach any of the provisions of this contract and fail to cure said
within thirty (30) days after written notice is g'. .n him, that the City may
terminate this Agreement. In the event that the City terminates this
Agreement, then the contractor shall have no further rights hereunder; and the
City can then undertake to provide said service under this Agreement by force
account, contractor or otherwise, and apply the performance bond posted by the
contractor in accordance with this Agreement, to cover all costs and expenses
which the City mayincur in providing Such services.
SECTION 7 The service of written notice to the parties hereto shall be
by personal service or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, postage
prepaid and addressed as follows:
31
City Engineer ( ) •
City of Rancho Cucamonga ( Contractor )
P. 0. Box 807 ( )
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ( )
Such service shall be deemed given as of the date of personal service or as of
the date of deposit into the United States Mail.
SECTION 8. The contractor shall not transfer, assign, sublet or lease
any part or portion of the Agreement without prior written approval of the
City Council per Attachment "A ", Section III.
SECTION 9. It is agreed that this contract shall be binding on and shall
inure to the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns.
SECTION 10. This contract shall be subject to the provisions of all laws
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California. •
IN WITNESS WHEREOF: The parties hereto, on the day and year first
written above, have executed this Agreement in counter parts.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
yo
•
SECTION IV
• STREET STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PROPOSAL
ANNAIL QUANTITIES
Note: To compute this bid sheet, multiply the quantity times the unit rate to
arrive at the toal for each entry.
A. BID SHEET
1. Reflective Centerline and Lane Lines Unit Price Total
a. Broken Lines 400,000 Lin. Ft. @ .017 6800.00
per — F7—
b. 4" Solid Lines 90,000 Lin. Ft. @ .05 4500.00
pert.
•
IlL
c. Two 4" Double Solid
lines with 4" Black
Separation
d. 8" Solid lines
e. Two Way Left Turn,
both sides, 4" lines
with 4" Black
separation
2. Stencils - Reflective
a. 31 Letters
b. Limit Bars 12" Wide
c. Arrows
d. RRX Complete both sides
of Track
3. Crosswalks - Reflective
75,000 Lin. Ft. @ .12 9000.00
per t.
15,000 Lin. Ft. @ .08 1200.00
per it.
75,000
Lin. Ft. @
.095
7125.00
2,200
Letters @
2.55
5610.00
per Fetter
3,000
Lin. Ft. @
.265
795.00
per
200
Arrows @
3.50
700.00
per arrow
15
Sets @
50.00
750.00
per set
a. 12" Wide - 15,000 Lin. Ft. @ .265 3975.00
per ft.
4. Parkin
a. Parking T's 40 T's @ .60 24.00
per �-
b. Curb Painting 20,000 Lin. Ft. @ .18 3600.00
per fit.
yr
5. Small Stencils
a. Non
Unit Price Total
•
-re ective
Letters
100 Letters @
15
per e 15.00
t�er
6, Markin Removal
_
a. Wet Sandb asting
10,000 Sq. Ft, @
60
6000.00
Per q, t.
7. Blackout
10,000 Sq. Ft. @
10
1000.00
Per q, t.
8. Pre - Lining
100,000 Lin. Ft. @
.025 2500.00
per t.
9. Reflective Pavement Markers 6,000 @
2.50
15000.00
eacTi, fnstallea�
10. Ceramic Pavement Markers
3,000 @
1.00
3000.00
..Mailed --
GRAND TOTAL (ITEMS 1 through
10)
S 71,594.00
•
1
i
CONTRACTORS INFORMATION SHEET
• The names of all persons interested in the foregoing proposal are principals
are as follows:
NAME: K.W. Spitler P.O. Box 725 Fillmore, Ca. 93015
ADDR SS
__805- 524 -1704
PHONE
NAME:
AO
If the interested person is a corporation, the following information is to be
furnisned:
NAME OF CORPORATION: Safety i rvice Inc.
ADDRESS OF CORPORATI N: _P.O. Box 725 Fil bare Ca 3015
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 524 -1204
STATE OF iNCORPORATiS� California
NAME OF PRESIDENT: K.W. Spitler
NAME OF SECRETARY: Thcnas Spitler
NAME OF TREASURER: R.Fi. spitler
NAME OF MANAGER:
If the interested person is in a partnersmp, insert name o irm here:
• Name and address of all individual partners.
NM yN
NAME AOOR SS H
NAM H—' 7r_
State Contractor's License Number: 308669
City Business License Number:
(Required only after bid has been awarded
List number and type of equipment:
?- Stenci' Trucks 1- Striper and I- Pic'cuo
Y2
NS/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORTS
,.
June 20, 1984
A
t:
TO:
City Manager and City Council
1977
FROM:
Robert A. Rizzo,
Assistant to City Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of City Offices Lease Agreement with A. H.
Reiter Development for a Term of Thirty Six Months
Our lease for office space (except for Community Service's space) will be
expiring on
June 30, 1984. This brings to end an 18 -month period
where the
lease cost has not been raised. Presently we are leasing a total
of 11,980
square feet of office space and 1,200 square feet of storage space.
The proposed
lease includes 3,885 additional square feet of office
space and
an increase
of between 8% and 10% depending on the location of the office
space. Listed
below is the current City Office leased space
and lease
increases and proposed additional office space:
Current City Offices Leased Space
•
Cost per Monthly
Lease
Units
Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Payment
Term
9340 A -E
6,680 .4362 $2,914
6/84
Community Dev.
9320 C
4,000 .65 $2,600
6/84
Administration
Finance
9330 #201
1,300 .77 $1,003
6/85
Community Svc
9360 A
1,200 .28 $340
6/84
Storage
Lease Increa;• and Proposed Additional Office Space
Cost per
Unit
Sq. Ft. Cost per Monthly
Lease
Sq. Ft. Increase /% Sq. Ft. Payment
Term
9340 A -F
9,540 .05 (10S) .488 $4,656
36 mot
9330 #203
1,225 N/A .488 598
36 mot
Com. Dev.
•
Continued...
NS/
June 20, 1984
Approval of Lease Agreement
Page 2
9320 C 4,000 .06 (8f) .71 $2,840 36 moe
Admin
Finance
9330 0201 1,300 N/A .77 $1,003 12 mo
Community Svc
9360 A 1,200 .04 (10%) .32 384 36 we
Storage 8,478
07% increase in second and third year.
In addition to the lease agreement, A. R. Reiter Development has indicated
they would contribute $10,000 for office space modification. The term of the
lease agreement is for 36 months with 7$ increase in the second and third
year.
Recommendation:
City Council approve City Office lease agreement with A. R. Reiter Development
for a term of 36 months.
RAR :mk
1-/.i
•
•
LBH :Jaa
Attachment
is
4�G
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
y, r
O
W11
A
-,
D
1977
DATE: Junc 20, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: Award of Bear Gulch, Arrow Route and Arrow Park Grading
Improvements Contract
Sealed proposals for the above referenced project were opened in the office of
the City Clerk on Monday, June 11, 1984 at 10:00 am.
Proposed were submitted by:
•
Redlands Paving of Redlands, CA @ $112,277.22
Tonco Company of Yucaipa, CA @ $100,183.16
Vance Corporation of Upland, CA @ $ 87,490.50
A bid summary of the proposals submitted is attached for your information.
REC"ENOATION
It is recommended that Council approve the award of the Contract for
Improvements of Bear Gulch Place, Arrow Route and Arrow Park Grading to Vance
Corporation of Upland, California, the lowest, responsible bidder, for the
amount of $87,490.50 plus a 10% contingency. The total amount of the contract
not to exceed $96,239.00. Funds to be charged to Parks Development with
reimbursement from Systems Development fees for Arrow Route Improvements.
Respectful;lylssub }tted,
ml
zu /
%m
2
LBH :Jaa
Attachment
is
4�G
CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS
OPENED
PROJECT: Bear Gulch
Place, Arrow Route
and Arrow Park Grading
DATE: June 11, 1984
LOCATION: Bear Gulch
Place, Arrow Route & Arrow
Park
CONTRACT
NO.
Redlands Paving
Tonco
Construction
Vance
Construction
ITEMS
QUANTITIES
BID
AMOUNT
BID
AMOUNT
BID
AMOUNT
1.
Clearing & Grubbing -St.
Lump Sum
L.S.
11,000.00
L.S.
5,550.00
L.S.
3,500.00
2.
Clearing & Grubbing -Pk.
Lump Sum
L.S.
19,800.00
L.S.
6,800,00
L.S.
2,500.00
3.
Excay. & Fill - St.
Lump Sum
L.S.
8,500.00
L.S.
7,600.00
L.S.
8,000.00
4,
Excay. & Fill - Pk.
Lump Sum
L.S.
16,445.00
L.S.
24,800.00
L.S.
14,000.00
5.
A. C. Pavement
680 Tons
31.00
21,080.00
31.00
21,080.00
34.50
23,460.00
6.
Crushed Agg. Base
459 Tons
12.00
5,508.00
10.80
4,957.20
14.00
6,426.00
7.
P.C.C. Curb & Gutter
851 Ln. Ft.
6.50
5,531.50
8.00
6,808.00
6.70
5,701.70
8.
P.C.C. Sidewalk
3789 Sq. Ft.
1.30
4,925.70
1.35
5,115.15
1.30
4,925.70
9.
P.C.C. Drive App.
242 Sq. Ft,
2.00
484,00
1.55
375.10
2.00
484.00
10.
P.L.C. Cross Gutter
1399 Sq. Ft.
3.00
4,197.00
3.30
4,616.70
3.00
4,197.00
.( 11.
P.C.L. Handicap Ramp
102 Sq. Ft.
2.00
204.00
1.35
137.70
1.30
132.60
12.
Under Sdwlk Drain - "B"
1 Each
3,000.00
3,000.00
1,600.00
1,600.00
4,775.00
4,775.00
13.
Under Sdwlk Drain -507
1 Each
1,000,00
1,000.00
700.00
700.00
2,100.00
2,100.00
14.
Remove Exist. A.C.
375 Sq. Fl.
10.00
3,750.00
2.53
948.75
.50
187.50
15.
Remove Exist. Sdwlk.
40 Sq. Ft.
10.00
400.00
3.75
150,00
.50
20.00
16.
Remove Exist. Curb
20 Ln. Ft.
10.00
200.00
3.75
75.00
6.00
120.00
17.
2" Galy. Wtr. Serv.
62 Ln. Ft.
13,71
850.02
45.00
2,790.00
47.00
2,914.00
18.
Util. Trenchng & Bkfl.
784 Ln. Ft.
3.00
2,352.00
4,84
3,794.56
3.00
2,352.00
19.
"Stop" Sign
1 Each
200.00
200.00
220.00
220.00
225.00
225.00
20.
M -53 Sign
1 Each
150.00
150.00
105.00
105.00
90. DO
90,00
21.
R26 Sign
2 Each
125.00
250.00
80.00
160.00
70.00
140.00
22.
Type "L" Marker
4 Each
75.00
300.00
35.00
140.00
40.00
160.00
23.
W -81 Sign
1 Each
150.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
70.00
70.00
24.
Traffic Barrier
2 Each
500.00
1,000.00
230.00
460.00
100.00
200.00
25.
Traffic Striping
Lump Sum
L.S.
1,000.00
L.S.
1,100.00
810.00
810.00
TOTALS
$112,277.22
$100,183.16
$87,490.50
AGREE'-'.ENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered Into this day of
19 by and between the CITY OF
CDRPORA iON, hereinafter called City, and
hereinafter called Contractor.
'd MlESSET'd, that the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE I: For and in consideration of the payments and agreement h2,27. ^.after
mentioned to be mace and performed by said City, said Contractor agr2e5 :,i:•1
said City to perform and complete in a ' :,or <manlike manner all .vorx recu'!rrd
under the Contract Proposal titles:
THE IDIPROVDIENTS OF BEAR GULCH PLACE,
ARROW ROUTE AND ARROW PARE GRADING
in acco-tance .0th the Specification and Drawings therefor, to furnish at nis
own expense all labor, materials, equiprant, tools and services nece SSary
therefor, except such materials, equipment, and services as may be stipulated
in said Spec r ications to be furnished by said City, and to do ever!tning
re= red by this Agree•,nent and the said Specifications and Drawings.
ARTiC1S II: For furnishing all said labor, materials, equioment, tools, and
. services, furnishing and removing all plant, temporary structures, tools, and
equipment, and doing everything required by this Agreement and the sa,c
Specifications and Drawings; also for ail loss and damage arising alt bf the
nature of :nz wor< aforesaid, or free t'. ^,e action of the elements, or frcin any
unforeseen 3i`ficulties which may arise during the prosecution or the '.vor:
until tis acceptance by said City, and for all r :s' <s of every
connected with the +or¢; also for all expenses resulting From . the suspens'7n
or disc7ntlruance of work, except as in the said Specifications are a. <oressly
s=ioulated to be borne by said City; and for co,nol=_teing the work in
accordance with the requiremehts of said Specifications and Dra'.aings, sa' ;,d
City will pay and said Contractor shall receive, in hill ......ensat cn
thareofore, the prlce(s) named in the ?rcocsa'.
The City hereby employs said s 1trIctor to p- '7rm t._ .;7r<
according to the terms of this Agreement for tre above.mentloned pr,ca�s;, ano
agrees to pay the same at the time, in the r.anner, and ador, tn=_ ccndit {cns
st'oulated in the said Specifications; and the said oar -.,as for the °so';�s
their heirs, executors, ad"%)nistfators, sJ.cessors, an] aw -,rs, ::p .i ere7y
ayr9e to the fill per'or7anca of the c7venant3 lerei^. 7ntafr`ed.
'lnat',:n 7'j
�f ]wings ,� :M1I did:: Q,P;a 1ssJe1 Jy th2 '.y ,,.t1 ___ the °'ioir.'j
prior to the opE ^,iv.i Jf plus, are hereby 1nCCp ;r at :] pin .nC -',a Ga pi''. 'f
,Agreement.
9 F_1
4/2
0
IN HITHNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be
executed the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
By:
City Clarx,
Ap proved as to firm
By
THE CITY OF RANXHO CUCAN.ONGA, CALIFOR3IA
3y:
Mayor
Contractor
By: •(�ignawrel
e
Attest:
By:
(Signature)
F -2
y9
•
•
9
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 20, 1984
City Council and City Manager
N
1977
Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer
Dave Leonard, Maintenance Superintendent
Renewal of City -Wide Parkway and Irrigation Maintenance Contract
As provided in the above- mentioned contract, renewal can be for an additional
year, not to exceed '10 %, if mutually acceptable to the City and the
Contractor. SCLM, Ic. is requesting a 4% increase (see attached letter). The
request seems reasonable with the recent inclusion of the Cucamonga Creek
Landscaping area to the contract. The area represents an increase of 138,500
sq. ft. (3.2 A) of additional responsibility. Numerous design deficiencies
with the Cucamonga Creek Project will make it difficult to maintain.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the renewal of the City -Wide
Parkway and Irrigation Maintenance Contract with a 4% increase from July 1,
1984 to June 30, 1985 with SCI-M, Inc. of La Verne, California.
Res Rectfull /.�. /y / /{{..submi ted,
L M: :jaa
Attachments
so
Lic. No. C27 403888
Landscape Contractors
1843 C STREET LAVERNE CALi FOP, 1A 91750
:1 590 3253
6 June 1984
co mean v, ^,
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mr. Dave Leonard
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga. Calif. 91730
Dear Dave,
As provided for in our current contract, the percent of increase
we would request for renewal is 41�. This would !,axe the monthly
cost per square foot .0107.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely, �Q\
� i � `F+",
Thomas A. Hanson
President,
SCLM Co., Inc.
TAH /prh
S/
PARKWAY AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT •
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 20th day of June 1984 , by
and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA hereinaftercalled "City" and
SCIM CO. INC. hereinafter called "Contractor ".
SECTION 1: The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City,
hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to
perform and complete, in a good and workmanlike manner, the landscape maintenance in
strict accordance with Specification entitled "Citywide Parkway and Irrigation
Maintenance" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in accordance with the Contractor
are hereby made a part of this contract.
SECTION 2: The City, in consideration of the performance of this contract,
agrees to pay the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in full satisfaction
the sum of Eight Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Dollars and Fifty Three Cents (S
Oark;ay-additio,ns during the course of the contract shall be billed at the monthly
unit cost of 80.0106 per square foot for the balance of the contract. Duration
of the contract saTT- e 2 months beginning July 1, 1984 and terminating June 30,
1985. Contract can be renewed at this time for an additional 1 year with a 10%
(not to exceed 10%) maximum increase provided contract is mutually acceptable to both
parties, on a year by year basis.
SECTION 3: As provided for in Section A6q of the special provisions, the City •
shall have the right during the term of this agreement to review with the Contractor
the work which he has performed. If, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the
landscape maintenance has not been performed in a satisfactory manner, the City may,
upon fifteen (15) days notice in writing to the contractor, cancel this contract. In
the event of cancellation, monies due the contractor or retain under the terms of the
contract, shall be forfeited to the City, not to exceed the amount necessary to
correct deficiencies in the landscape maintenance.
SECTION 4: The Contractor shall commence work under this agreement on July 1,
1984.
IN WIT14ESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this contract as of the
date hereinabove specified.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
qty C erk By:
Contractor
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney
14-
5.DL.
LJ
• CONTRACT PROPOSAL
For the City of Rancho Cucamonga, project entitled "Citywide Parkway and Irrigation
Maintenance ", contractor shall furnish landscape and irrigation maintenance.
The undersigned bidder further declares that he has carefully examined the location
of the proposed work, that he has examined the special provisions and specifications,
and read the accompanying instructions to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if
this proposal i5 accepted, to furnish all materials and do all the work required to
complete the said work in accordance with the Special Provisions and Specifications,
in the time and manner therein prescribed for the lump sum and unit cost amounts set
fcrth in the schedule on the following Proposal.
Beginning Monthly Monthly Yeariy Cost
Description Approx. Unit Unit Cost (Monthly Cost % 12)
Quantity Cost Contract Amount
Continuous
Parkway 785,899 Sq.Ft. 0.0106 $8330.53 $99,966.35
Maintenance as
Per Contract
.aecifications
Ninety Nine Thousand wine Hundred
• Total: Sixty Six and Thirt Five Cents $ 99,966.35
Wor s
Date: June 20, 1984 Bidder: SCLM Co., Inc.
By: Tom Hanson
Contract Renewable for an additional 1 year starting July, 1985.
Not to exceed 10% increase.
-5-
S3
SUPPLEMENT
EXTRA WORK SCHEDULE:
HOURLY LABOR COST UNIT LABOR COST
ITEM DESCRIPTION INCLUDING OVERHEAD INCLUDING OVERHEAD
A Irrigation Repair an --------------- - --
Installation
B Controller Repair and S13.26 --------------- - - --
Installation
L Plant 15 gal tree & Stake ---------------- - - - - -- a 6.2
O
Plant 5 gal Shrub ---------------- - - - - -- S 8.84
F Plant I Flat Groundcover ---------------- - - - - -- S 6.24
•
HOURLY LABOR RATE:
(List all applicable positions and /or classifications) •
M CL ATION H U LY A IJ L`ICLUO JIG 0'i RH AO
d Irrigation Installer S 9.36
C Licensed Chemical Applicator a
Date
1984 -85
6-
s4
Bidder:
By:
•
0
•
s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Superintendent
1 ^Mam�
SUBJECT: Agreement with CalTrans for Utilizing Freeway Right -of -Way Land
Attached is a no -fee lease agreement with the State of California, Department
of Transportation for use of freeway right -of -way property adjacent to Alta
Loma Park. The purpose of the area will be for the temporary storage of
street sweeping debris and other public works generated refuse. The
conditions of the agreement call for berming, fencing and landscaping of the
proposed area. Fencing and berming can be completed by existing contracts and
funding. Volunteer labor is avilable through the California Department of
Youth Authority upon which to complete the landscaping. Minor supervision and
purchase of necessary landscaping supplies will be required by the City.
Estimated cost to complete the landscaping are as follows:
Irrigation Supplies $2,000.00
Plant Material $3,600.00
Rental Equipment S 250.00
3sm=
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council negotiate the agreement with CalTrans and
authorize the Engineering Division to purchase landscaping materails and
formulate agreement with the Department of Youth Authority for use of
volunteer labor.
Respectfully
Attachment
S's-
08- SBD- 30 -5.1
Deed No. 4223
Rental Acct. No. 4223- 001 -05
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lessee
LEASE
THIS LEASE, made and entered into this day of , 1984,
at San Bernardino, California, by and between the State of California,
Department of Transportation, hereinafter known as Lessor, and the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter known as Lessee, whose address is
9320 Baseline Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730.
WITNESSETH
That the Lessor, in consideration of the covenants and agreements
herein contained, does hereby lease, demise and let unto Lessee that
certain property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, said land or interests therein
• being shown on the map or plat attached hereto marked, "Exhibit A," and
by this reference made a part hereof, and more particularly described
as follows:
40
The easterly 380' of the south 330' of
Lot 11, Block 15, Cucamonga Homestead Association,
recorded in Map Book 5, Page 46,
Records of San Bernardino County.
including improvements, if any, for the term of five (5) years,
commencing on the 1st day of April, 19 ?4, and ending on the 31th day
of March, 1989, with the right of cancellation and termination in
both Lessor and Lessee as hereinafter set forth, at no rental due
because of the public benefit to be derived from the planned use of the
property.
The Lessor and Lessee hereby agree to the following covenants, terms and
conditions:
USE: Lessee shall;
(a) Use the property for the following purposes only:
Temporary debris storage area fully screened by an earth berm,
fence and landscaping.
56
(b) Not commit, suffer or permit any waste on the property and
comply with all State laws, local ordinances or other
governmental regulations in crnnection with pest control, Old
use, etc., which may be required by the proper authorities;
(c) Permit Lessor or its agents to enter on the property at any
reasonable timo- to inspect same;
(d) Not assign, let or sublet this Lease, and shall not make any
alteration in or on the property without the written consent of
the Lessor;
2. TERMINATION:
(a) This Lease shall be subject to cancellation or termination by
either party at any time during the term by giving the other
party notice in writing at least 90 days prior to the date when
termination shall become effective. Upon termination of said
lease for any reason whatsover, Lessor shall not be required to
provide replacement lands or facilities or any compensation in
any manner for land or improvements or for any damages of any
kind caused by said termination.
(b) At the expiration of said term, or any sooner termination of
this Lease, to quit and surrender possession of said property
and its appurtenances, to Lessor in as good order and conditior
as the property was delivered to the undersigned Lessee,
reasonable wear and tear and damage by the elements and oto
casualties expected. In the event this lease is terminated or
at the expiration of the period of this lease, Lessee agrees
upon request by Lessor, to remove all improvements including
the earth berm, fencing and landscaping from the leased
premises at its sole expense within 50 days after request by
Lessor. If Lessee fails to remove all improver�nts, Lessor ma,
remove such improvements at the expense of Lessee and bring an
action for recovery of such costs, together with all expenses
and attorney's fees incurred by reason of said action.
(c) Should the Lessee hold over after the expiration of the term of
this Lease with the consent of the Lessor, expressed or
implied, the tenancy shall be deemed to be a tenancy only from
year to year, subject otherwise to all of the terms and
conditions of this Lease so far as applicable.
1. 'IC771c5: All notices to be given to Lessee shall be delivered
personon= or by sending a copy through the mail addressed to Lessee a1
the address atove stated. All notices to be given to the Lessor shall
be delivered personally to 247 W. Third Street, or sent to the State of
California, Department of Transportation, at P. O. Box 231, San
Bernardino, California 92401, or such other place as the Lessor may
designate in writing. •
S'7
• 4. MAINTENANCE: Lessee shall not call on Lessor to make any
improvemen s or repairs on the property of any nature whatsoever, and
agrees to keep the same in good order and condition at his own cost and
expense.
5. LITIGATION COSTS: In the event that a suit is necessary to
enforce any o t e provisions herein contained, or to recover possession
of the prmises, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable
Attorney's Fees in addition to costs and necessary disbursements.
6. INSURANCE: Lessee shall, at its own expense, take out and keep
in forerfng the within tenancy, public liability insurance and
property damage insurance in a company or companies to be approved by
the Lessor, to protect the State of California, its officers, agents, nd
employees, as a named additional insured, against any liability to the
public incident to the use of and resulting from injury to, or death of,
any person or persons or property damage, including parked vehicles,
occurring in, or about the premises, in the amount of not less than
$2,000,000 to indemnify against the claim of one or more persons
resulting from any one „accident. Said policies shall inure to the
contingent liabilitie,s if any, of the Lessor, and the officers, agents
and employees of Lessor and shall obligate the insurance carriers to
notify Lessor, in writing, not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the
cancellation thereof, or any other change affecting the coverage of the
policies. If said policies contain any exclusion concerning property
in the care, custody or control of the insured, an endorsement shall be
• attached thereto stating that such exclusion shall net apply with regard
to any liability of the State of California, its officers, agents, or
employees. Lessee shall furnish to Lessor a certified copy of each and
every such policy within not more than ten (10) days after the effective
date of the policy. Lessee agrees that, if Lessee does not keep such
insurance in full force and effect, Lessor may take out insurance and
pay the premiums thereon, and the Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for any
and all cost involved.
1. PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS: Any existing Lease or Rental Agreements
between Lessee and Lessor (or its predecessor in interest) covering this
property are terminated as of the effective date of this Lease.
`J
B. NCNLIABILITY OF LESSOR; This Lease is made upon the express
condition that the Lessor, its officers, agents and employees are to be
free from all liability and claim for damage by reason of any injury to
any person or persons, including Lessee, or property of any kind
whatsoever and to whomsoever belonging, including Lessee, from any cause
or causes whatsoever while in, upon, or in any uay connected with the
property or the sidewalks adjacent thereto during the term of this Lease
or any extension hereof or any occupancy hereunder, Lessee agrees to
indemnify and save harmless Lessor, its officers, agents and employees
from all liability, loss, cost and obligations on account of or arising
out of any such injuries or losses however occurring.
T2
9. NONDISCRIMINATION: The Lessee, for himself, his heirs, personal
representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of t�
consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant
running with the land that in the event facilities are constructed,
maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this
Lease, for a purpose for which a Department of Transportation program or
activity is extended or ..for another purpose involving the provision of
similar services or benefits, the Lessee shall maintain and operate such
facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements
imposed jrsuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of
Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21,
Nondiscrimination in Federally- assisted programs of the Department of
Transportation - Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, and as said Regulations may be amended.
Lessee also agrees that in the event of breach of any of the above
nondiscrimination covenants, the State of California shall have the
right to terminate the Lease, and to re -enter and repossess said land
and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said Lease had never
been made or issued.
10. WAIVER: If any part of the Lease is invalid by reason of law or
governmental regulation, or if any provisions hereof are waived by
Lessor, the remaining portions of this Lease shall remain in full force
and effect.
11. RELOCATION PAYMENT: No relocation payment will be made to •
L^--ee by Lessor except as provided by law.
12. SUBMISSION OF PLANS : Lessee will submit development or
modification plans to essor for approval and will not proceed with the
development until approval has been received from Lessor.
13. HEADINGS: The marginal or clause headings of this Lease are not
P. partofthis Lease and shall have no effect upon the construction or
interpretation of any part hereof.
BREACH OF ANY OF THE ABOVE COVENANTS, TERMS, AND CONDITIONS SHALL GIVE
LESSOR AUTHCRITY TO IMMEDIATELY TERMINATE THIS LEASE.
SLATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ccpartment of Transportation
By
Chi'r7 Services
Parr dJ'.;J I's TO FORM
DATE
er
DIV. r ? <a Ira
IUNWCWA.IOnW CALIFORNIA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
Mayor _
•
Attest
City Clerk
l� a
j 2 J
:f
P J
F.0
�fJ
F �
e '
)
u
1
u
2 +1
A �
se.
N
ti
U
mv
V)
2
t.
I�
b�
2
�L
�fl
Z
ig
L L•
O
Z °
,e 1
is
t
11T nC O A AYr Vn rrlr A UAXTrA
STAFF REPORT
' S
157
DATE: June 20, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BV: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Setting Public Hearing for Annexation No. 4 to Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts 12316, 12316 -1, 12317, 12317-
1, 12364, 12364 -1 and 12402
The attached resolutions set the public hearing for July 18, 1984 to annex the
subject tracts to the City's Lighting District No. 1 which covers the arterial
street lights. The local street lights for these tracts are included in
Lighting District No. 4 formed for the Terra Vista Planned Community.
The Engineer's Report for the annexation showing the number of street lights,
the number of lots to be annexed into the district and the estimated amount of
assessment is attached for preliminary approval.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the
date of public hearing for July 18, 1984, and giving preliminary approval of
the Engineer's Report.
Respectfully sub
L B j
Atta menu
ca /
0 TERRA VISTA
May 16, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Hand Delivered
Attention: John Martin
Subject: Tract No. 12316
CITY Gf mANCHO CUCAMONC.1
Dear John: EI!GIf1EtR!NG MT151.0
Please accept this letter as our notification of intent to join the existing
landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Cordially,
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS R. WALKER
Staff Engineer
DRW:jgc
1
1156 N MoWam Ave
PC Boa 670
Upland, CA 91786
(714) 9050971
Developed by Lewis Homes 6 Z
-Im' TERRA VISTA
May 16, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: John Martin
Subject: Tract No. 12316 -1
Dear John:
Hand Delivered
;Y
CITY OF RANCHO COCA LiC::Od
E?',INE_R!fiG 01y', 5:071
Please accept this letter as our notification of intent to join the existing
landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Cordially,
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS'R. WALKER
Staff Engineer
ORW:jgc
1156 N Mown am Ave
PO Box670
Upland. CA 91786
(714) 9850971
Developed by Lewis Homes (0 3
0
•
E
0 Im TERRA VISTA
May 16, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: John Martin
Hand Delivered
Subject: Tract No. 12317 r,;TV OF RSNCIW CDCAMUICA
Dear John:
Please accent this letter as our notification of intent to join the existing
landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Cordially,
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAf R. WALKER
Staff Engineer
DRW:jgc
1156 N Mountain Ave
PO Bo, 670
Upland CA 91786
(7ta) 985 0971
Developed by Lewis Homes 6 ,
TERRA VZSM
May 16, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: John Martin
Subject: Tract No. 12317 -1
Dear John:
Hand Delivered
!'!" 1 T
:IiY Ci RANCHO CGC-Ku iGA
EPin'EEPNG D;9:S'01
Please accept this letter as our notification of intent to join the existing
landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Cordially,
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS �. WALKER
Staff Engineer
ORW:jgc
1156 N Mountain Ave
PO Bo *670
Upland CA 91786
(714) 9850971
0eveli by Lewis Homes G S
0
•
• TERRA VISTA
May 16, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: John Martin
Subject: Tract No. 12364
Dear John:
Hand Delivered
CIi. C,' PMiCHO CUCA` ONGA
rNGAN ER:NG oivis:on
Please accept this letter as our notification of intent to join the existing
landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Cordially,
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS C WALKER
Staff Engineer
DRW:jgc
1156 N Mountain Ave
PO Box 670
UolanO, CA 91766
(714) 9850971
De`/elOPOO by LOWIa HOmea 64
MTERRA VISTA
May 16, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: John Martin
Subject: Tract No. 12364 -1
Dear John:
Hand Delivered
C J
aks :ivu
0114 ,f G fiCMG E'J':A'KNGA
E%G04LERING WiISION
Please accept this letter as our notification of intent to join the existing
landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Cordially,
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA j
DOUGLAS 9. WALKER
Staff Engineer
ORW:jgc
1156N Mountain A,e
PO Boe 670
Upland, CA 91786
(714) 9850971
Developed by Laws Homes 1O 7
0
•
•
/ i7
/�rfGG.r
• 777F771
May 22, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: John Martin
Subject: Tract No. 12402
Dear John:
Please accept this letter as our notification of intent to join the exist-
ing landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Cordially,
WESTERN PROPERTIES
DOUGLAS R. WALKER
Staff Engineer
"u R'vl:jgc
11 "', % Nio,%a n Ave
PO Tic. 670
UPI 00 CA 91786
( 7141 985.0971
a
Owe n74q
by Lewia MOmeb
G8
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Engineer's Report for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No.
Annexation No. 4
TRACTS 12316, 12316 -1 , 12317, 12317 -1,
12364, 12364 -1 AND 12402
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is in compliance with
1. Division 15 of the Streets and
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. General Description
the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
Highways Code, State of California
This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit
"A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has
determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon
all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the
street lights.
are: Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the. district
• The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on
arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is
considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost
shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums
with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall
be considered to benefit the same as a lot.
SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the
developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions
of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering
Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development
plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting
areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the
individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent
as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district
include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of
any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area.
SECTION 4. Estimated Costs
• No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction.
All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data,
it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as
indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be
based on actual cost data.
69
The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 .
(including Annexation No. 4 comprised of 397 lots and 13 9500L street lights.
is shown below:
1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy:
Lamp Size* Quantity ate **
9500L ff
5800L 95 8.75
*High Pressure SodTum Vapor
Lamps Rate Mo's Total
115 X 9.90 X 12 = 13,662.00
95 X 8.75 X 12 = 9,975.00
2. Costs per dwelling Unit: 23,637.00
Total Annual Maintenance Cost 23 637 7.87 /year /unit
No. of Units in District* •
7.87 divided by 12 = b0.66 /mo /unit
Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6.
SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram
Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and
labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ", Annexation No. 4.
These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. Assessment
Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all
dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each
unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of
assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional
to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel.
It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
District.
SECTION 7. Order of Events
1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's •
Report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets
public hearing date.
7 0
• 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
G1J
EXHIBIT W .
Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 4 of Street
Lighting Maintenance District 1:
Tract 'No of Units /Lots No of Street Lights
12316 36 S.F. 5
12316 -1 37 S.F. 0
12317
50
S.F.
2
12317 -1
67
S.F.
2
12364
45
S.F.
2
12364 -1
27
S.F.
2
12402
152
Units
0
W
T3
•
J
rf 1
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
• STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO.4
0
ac,�t,o
a:
TRACT NO. 12316
�40 32 GcmC
4
6 `O
a C.)
b
0
i
V
o�
O�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN
^
title'
BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA T
2 1� page
LOYD MUMS CITY ENGINEER R .23889 OATE
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I
ANNEXATION NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12316 -1
Base Line m Road
e �
o rQc
10 O
t2 UDC
D
0
�o
d
V
l
O
°`" 0'^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w "t 1e;
COUNTY OF SAN BMNARDINO , \
E' STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Im LLOYD MUBBS. CITY ENGINE '.R R. :,M 1 r ` pa !
•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12317
m
Im -
ac
40
42
44
8 8 SO
4t
4�
1145
47 49
28
4)
C
4 07
se
ss
34 m
d
c N
� m
x
"C' 5treet
112'8/4
2/21
20
18
17
Q 1
� 16 ` 14
• 15
_e c�
7 4
e Gr
a �o
10
11 Vo
12 c
3 `p
d
C.i L;
title;
t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO n —
>: STATE OF CALIFORNIA T
l�f page
1971 1 1 n..n W mee r7v ammPiFFR RCE 23889 047E
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 •
d
d
a
c
d
m
ANNEXATION NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12317 -1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
.OYD I1UBB5, CITY ENfrlN '�—
N
title;
0
0
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12364
Base Line Road
44 4S 1 2 3 4 8
e
'C' Street
7
43 42 41 40 39 38
9
27 28 D7 to
to
29 30 °��' •G" Street
2s 35 r
11
m 30 LL
25 d 34 •
12
31
24 N 33
13
32
23 W Street
14
p.
1s 17 is
1S
22 21 20 19
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t1tle;
`J COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
�7 yC
s STATE OF CALIFORNIA T
U � EY 77 lei
im LLOYO MUBBS CITY ENGINEER R.C.E.23889 GATE D°ge
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 •
ANNEXATION NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12364 -1
Base Line Road
10 11 12 13 14
NCO Street
9
a 16 15
m 7 •
17
C -
m a m to
> m
a b
m rn 19
4 M 20
y 3 21
2
22
1
28 25
24 23
27
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title'
�, yC
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA T
1�I
Im LOYD NUBBS,CITY ENGINEER R.C.E.23889 DATE P�$°
0
•
9
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 4
TRACT N0. 12402
LOT 3
c LOT t
tf
G LOT 1
LOT 6
m
c�
LOT 2
a avkW aY
• RESOLUTION NO. 46- YB=TnR gy-1 ,7'7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
WHEREAS, on June 20, 1984, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of
said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of
said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report
has been presented to this Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each
and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is
sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be
modified in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
• SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and
expe ses OFsai3 —Work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith,
contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily
approved and confirmed.
r1
lJ
SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred
to and describ in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land
within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and
confirmed.
SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of
land in sai ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be
received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the
incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby
preliminarily approved and confirmed.
SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's
Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the
proposed district.
TO
RESOLUTION NO. 4 -2f-MR Ik-/ ,?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER
THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID
ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, as follows:
SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and
convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a
maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and
operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance
district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation
includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in
Connection with said district.
• SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be
located wit in roroadwayay rigs enumerated in the report of the City
Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the
office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 4 to Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 1 ".
SECTION 3. Oescr1 Lion of Assessment District: That the
contemplatedt ed worx, in the opim ono sai tty Counci , is Ot more than local
or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense
of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed
to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as
follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary
lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No.
4 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1"
maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of
said City.
SECTION 4, Report �of Engineer: The City Council of said City by
Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report
indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary,
assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City.
Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and
extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work.
21
SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be •
collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are
collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City
Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon
said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments
for the next fiscal year will be determined.
SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin : Notice is hereby given that
on July 1-8- I'4o4, at t e our o pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161
Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any
objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and
show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said
district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of
Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the
property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify
the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the
time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be
considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized
assessment roll of San ,,Bernardino County as the owner of the property
described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by
written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described.
SECTION 7. Landsca�Liyhting Act of 1972: All the work
herein propose s all a one ;nand carried t roughh in pursuance of an act of
the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and
Lignting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of •
the State of California.
SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice
shall be made pursuant to ect on o t e overnment Code. The Mayor
shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and
the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date
set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon 0. Mt a s, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
Beverly A. Aut a et, City Clerk
jaa
8�
0
C
11
,., '
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Secretary
SUBJECT: FUND TRANSFER REQUEST
The Planning Division is requesting that a microfiche viewer and
a small copier be purchased to accommodate the public at the counter
area as well as staff in the Community Development Department.
The Purchasing Division of the Finance Department has been conducting
a cost comparison and has ascertained that the microfiche viewer will
cost approximately $500 and a copier approximately $3,500. Testing
of the equipment is now taking place and purchase will be dependent
upon test results since most copiers are in the same price range.
As the Capital Equipment Fund does not allow for these purchases,
it is requested that $1,500 be transferred from the Building and
Safety Contract Services account, and $2,500 transferred from the
Maintenance and Operations Account of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions to the Equipment Account to accommodate purchase of this
equipment.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve transfer of funds in
the amount of $4,000 from the Building and Safety, Engineering and
Planning Divisions for the purchase of a microfiche viewer and
small /copier.
submitted,
Ric k /Gom €z, City Planner
RG:JK:jk
Q3
0
•
nTT nV n xinVn of T! ♦•.nXTi A
STAFF REPORT
f
DATE: June 20, 1984 .
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Edgar Casasola, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Environmental Review Thereof
1977
This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the
proposed Lemon Avenue Reconstructon Improvements for City Council approval and
issuance of a Categorical Exemption.
In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State
Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of
the above mentioned improvements, Said improvements generally entail the
removal and replacement of Asphaltic Concrete Pavement and Portland Cement
Concrete curb, gutters and cross gutters as well as the new construction of
Portland Cement Concrete curb, gutter, cross gutters and wheel chair ramps.
It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not
create a significant adverse impact on the environment and, therefore,
recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution approving
the environmental assessment and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the
proposed Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Improvements.
Resp ctfully su fitted,
J
C
L8H• C.jaa
Attachments
2Y
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
Categorical Exemption as per
CEQA Chapter 3, Article 19,
Class 1(C)
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
(REQUEST FOR CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION)
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
• should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: LEMON AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
(CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9390 flas p Line Road. P. O. Pox Rn7. Ranrhn Cucamonga- CA at73n
is
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Blare W. Frandsen Associate Civil En ineer,
City of Rancho Cucamonga, 93 ase ire oa arc o ucamonga, (;A 17 0
(714) 989 -1851
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
Lemon Avenue between Hermosa and Haven Avenues
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
I -1
QS
E
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 3.94 acres of project area
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INF RMAT� ION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
N0.
•
I -2
24
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
—" noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 2
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: Noise and vibration
yll increa a at the oroiect ite only for the dLration of reconstruc
.nA .,.nn.r. nn lo.,el< W.il not
sidewalk and existing curb. The second tree wiii not oe repiaceb because
its present location is within an extremely narrow strip of land between*
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page. N/A
*the existing sidewalk and a private wooden fence.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be required to be submitted bef an adequate
evaluation can be made by the Development Rev ew Co ittee.
Date June 12, 1984 Signature
BL NEW FRANOSEN
Title ASSOCIATE IVIL ENGINEER
I -3
27
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION •
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: N/A
Specific Location of Project:
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model M
and k of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Price Range
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
I -4
g
•
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
DATE: June 12, 1984
APPLICANT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FILING DATE: dune 20. 1984 LOG NUMBER: 12- 4637 -8076
PROJECT: LEMON AVENUE RFrONqjRUCTj0N IMRROV HFNTS
PROJECT LOCATION: LEMON AVENUE BETWEEN HFRMOCA AND HAVEN AV U �
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT'S
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
99
YES MAYBE NO
• 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
I
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
burial of the soil?
I
c. Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any potential Increase in wind or water
erosion of sails, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
_—
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
use of any mineral resource?
_ JL
2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
99
Page 2
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? _
90 _
•
•
E
YES MAYBE NO
A,
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels?
X
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runoff?
X
C.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
X
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
body of water?
X
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality?
X
f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
X
g.
Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
X
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other-
wise available for public water supplies?
X
I.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches?
X
3. Air
Qualltv. W411 the proposal have significant
results in:
a.
Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
X
Stationary sources?
—� 'X
b.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
Interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
X
c.
Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
X
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? _
90 _
•
•
E
Page 3
YES MAYBE NO
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
•
plants into an area?
— X
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production?
X
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals?
X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
X
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
X
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
X
5. Population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
•
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
X
6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
i
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
X
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
IL
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
— i
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
X
recreational opportunities?
91
-
Page 4
q;6
YES
MAYBE NO
8, Transportation. Will the proposal have significant
•
reaulu in:
A.
Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
X
b.
Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction? X
c.
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
X
d.
Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
X
e.
Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and /or goods?
X
f.
Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
X
g.
Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
X
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
•
a.
A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
X
10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal
have significant results in:
a.
Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
X
b.
Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
X
_.
A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
X
d.
An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
X
e.
Increase in existing noise levels?
X
f.
Exposure of people to pot.ntially dangerous
noise levels?
X
_
•
g.
The creation of objectionable odors?
X
h.
An increase In light or glare?
X
q;6
Page 5
YES MAYBE NO
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
• results in:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site? _
X
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors? _
X
12. Utilities and Publ Services. Will the proposal
ic
have a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power? _
X
b. Natural or packaged gas?
X
C. Communications systems? _
X _
d. Water supply?
X —
e. Wastewater facilities?
X _.
f. Flood control structures? _
_ X
g. Solid waste facilities? _
_ X
h. Fire protection? X
_._ _
1. Police protection? _.
_ X
J. Schools?
X
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
X
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities? X_
_
m. Other governmental services? _
_. X
13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _
,_ X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy.
X
_
c. An increase in the demand for development of
_ new sources of energy? _
X
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renevable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available? _
X
q3
Page 6
YES MAYBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or •
scarce natural resource? X
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
X
b.
Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the future).
X
C.
Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
•
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
X
d.
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
II. DISCUSSION OF M- IRO44ENTAL EVALUATION (i.e.. of affirmative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
6 b. Project costs are equitably distributed among project beneficiaries through
the implementation of gasoline taxes.
8 b. This project will have an improving effect on the existing street pavement,
subgrade, curb and gutter and sidewalk.
e. This project will have an interim effect on the present patterns of circula.
tion of vehicles, people and goods for the duration of the reconstruction
period Such circulation pattern impacts can be mitigated by the proper use
of roac.vay warning and detour signing.
g. Increases in the traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians
may occur during the reconstruction period. Such hazards can be mitigated by
proper warning signs.
10 e. Local noise levels will increase during the reconstruction of Lemon Avenue •
These noise levels can be mitigated by restricting the hours of operation of
heavy equipment and the installation of noise attenuators on said equipment.
9Y
II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
• 12. a S c This project may require the relocation of an existing electrical
power pole which carries both electrical and telephone wires.
This impact can be mitigated,by prior notification to the utility
companies and their customers of a temporary break in service.
•
0
d 8 e This project may require alterations to water or waste water
facilities in the form of adjustment of water valve and sewer
manhole covers, respectively.
h This project will require the relocation of three (3) fire
hydrants behind the proposed curb improvements. This impact
can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective water
company and fire district of a temporary break in service.
1 This project will improve existing public facilities such as
sidewalk, curb, gutters, cross gutters, road surface and subgrade,
thereby reducing the maintenance and repair requirements for said
existing deteriorating facilities.
'F S.
Page 7
III. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation: •
® I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and • NBOkPEYE- HE0hkRAPI9N will be prepared.
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
OI find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date June 12, 1984��
Signature
ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER
Title
I
L
•
9&
RESOLUTION O6- 20 -1*14, 94 —)e79
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL
EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED LEMON AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Lemon Avenue
Reconstruction Improvements; and
WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the
Environmental Assessment Initial Study and issuances of a Categorical
Exemption for the proposed Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Improvements.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of
. Determination—pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, My Clerk
jaa
97
Jon 0. Mi a s, Mayor
r1
u
J
FJ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Blane W. Frandsen, Associate Civil Engineer
y,
=II 6 �z
1977
SUBJECT: Grant of Utility Easement to the Southern California Edison Company
through Arrow Park and acceptance and or execution of Consent of
Encroachment granted to the City by the Southern California Edison
Company across said property and execution of Agreement between the
City and Central School District pertaining to the noted Grant of
Easement
A request or grant of easement has been received from the Southern California
Edison Company to allow for an electrical service line to be installed through
the Arrow Park Site to the new Bear Gulch Elementary School. The easement
document is attached herewith.
To allow the City to continue proposed development of the park site and
reserve the right to improve the drainage swale through the easement area a
Consent to Encroachment has been prepared by the Edison Company on behalf of
the City.
A requirement of the Consent to Encroachment is to indemnify or hold the
Edison Company harmless with regards to development of the easement area.
This document needs to be accepted by the City.
The final document is an agreement to be made between the City and Central
School District pertaining to the Grant of Easement which transfers the
indemnification and liability assumed in the Consent to Encroachment to the
School District also an agreement to relocate the proposed utility line at the
District's expense in the event that future development of the park facility
requires such.
RECOWENDATION
It is recommended that a Grant of Easement be made to the Southern California
Edison Company for electrical serviceline to the Bear Gulch School and that
the Consent to Encroachment and the Agreement pertaining to said Grant of
Easement be accepted and executed by the City Staff.
19
MC0m." ItCQ..M. r
• SwMarn Glifomia Ediadn C&,W" _cJCE
wean ..eonagp true n
$datearn Glilurnia Etliaan Company ACOCE
e! iT
n... awu. m.. ern. eon Mwgou'. ua.��.
GRANT OF EASEMENT unnn.ouau IefaRM RIORrui Mxw In. sarin�
I sO:
CITY OF RANCHO [UCAfgJNfuR, a municipal corporation,
COMP N rcfcrred toe. "Dancer orm a Inrcby panne to $OCTHd I. CALIFORNIA
'Gol IA EDi50g
COMPANY. a corpombn, rtf f.ceosen and esugna, lhvnnahn relemd toes "Gran<a "1, an eaxmem
and risk, of wn", to con [Fort, ox, mamla.n. epegqer. )lies, add to, repair. ,,Inc. rxonftrua, mmaket and
remove at any hoe and from lime to time aeaed.OR$rW undapound kc,"W supply "atema and mm- f-
municankin systems (hercinaher Mermd or as "ryxtm!'). consisting of to' rsrdMM1a�e.iaachoca.af.ssams.0
wires, underground confuter. cables. Faults, manholes. handholes, and including above -pound enclosures.
markets and concrete pads and other APPUnetnnt 6amres and equipment necessary or useful for distributing
riot rical owp and for lran.miWng mtellfpnoe by d « [anal me.....I. on, over, under, aerce. and along
that renal. real oniony In the Call of ....... ..........$an .BeflldrdeRa -., .,. .,..., ]uh u( California.
def<nbed a frllovw:
o. Fate
A Strip of land, NG fee[ in width, lying erMin rec rde Portion of Subdivision
Drell of tat 10, Cthe OffA VINEYARD Recor, as per map recorded in Easterly 20, page 44
wills. of Naps, in the Office to Ms Recorder of Said County; the Easterly 11ne of
6633 -� said stria being described ei follows:
COMMENCING at the intersection of the Northerly line of Arrow Route. 74 feet
4 -p 01 wide as now established. and the Easterly line of said Lot 13; thence NING;
55y•••' Northerly along said Easterly line. 456.98 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGLY
7 w thence continuing Northerly along said Easterly line, 145 feet.
Pit .1
Z18- l'
JSA: a
1-2a-34 1 Granma as qm.P, for themselva..h RIP. then Ih hen and augrn.. not to ereeh place or
r to permu the a emon, oal «mom n tncs at s u0dmg. planter bo.o, sank
fill oraother rruauro esoept wain and loots on nere.nbefora described ea Semnt area.
The Cramee, and ns contraa,m, agents And employees %hail M1nl the right ro trim Far to[ rush tree.
and .o scat such nom% a% may endanger or mnrfve A Ih. en4 y and Ill. 11 have free access se sad
systems and every part iheiof at all times for the vurpme of � ug in the rlghn he granted.
provided. however that in ma ,re, env excavation o lard proper. �of %the Grantari 1, thrcm e Grantee shall
make the same in such a sail A.ue the le o the surface of the ground around .cash
excavation, and shall « place the A?1h so removed by it in a the surface of the grmurd to as nor the
came condition As n .vas prior to such e¢ av> n as n prao.,We
E%ECL'T'ED thn day of 19 ..
CITY OF RANCMO CU A"ONfd, a municipal corporation
By
31:
i iTSE55 GRANTOR(S)
STATE OF -AT FVNNN I
COUNTY OF f %
0, 4aro.e Fare, a Sharf N61,c in a I lot AI4 slate wtun lr appeared
known to me to by ?he perwmp wren nail n unl urb.mbal I. sire nlhm avormis m,l rtkna+IedpA that he
(.he' liked elo,"I'd I'll tame
WITNESS my hand and official nn
earn,. 99
iaeCOnpme mew n
SDUDENR CALUNOW EDISON COMPANY
"a" imham ev .11 .
SOINNERN cAIIEDAINA EDIS0N COMPANY
w
FA a OT Iatr iNb LAND OFfi.
AAIm
emla uENU Male
So i
n ar
55 -97
6 -12 -84
M.
218 -2L18
��J
•
.., .1. cane row Mace" R.. uae-
CONSENT TO ENCROACHMENT
WHEREAS, the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, is the owner
(hereinafter referred to as 'DOW'), of that certain real property described
as Lot p, portion of Subdivision of Lot 10, Cucamonga Vineyard Tract, as per
map recorded In Book 20, page 44 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of San
Bernerdinm County, State of California; and
M%EAS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, 4 corporation, (hereinafter
referred to as 'Edison'), is the holder of an easement, for public utility
purposes Affecting the following legal description:
11
fp
A strip of land, 12 feet 10 width, lying within Lot 17, Portion of
Subdivision of Lot 10, CUCAMOIW VINEYARD TRACT, as per map recorded in
Book 20, page 44 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of said County;
the Easterly line of Said Strip being described as follows:
COMMENCING at the intersection of the Northerly line of Arrow Route,
74 feet wide as now establishd, and the Easterly line of said Lot I1;
thence Northerly along said Easterly line, 456.98 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; thence continuing Northerly along said Easterly line,
14S feet, recorded on , as Instrument No. ,
of Official Records of said County and State; and
WHEREAS, Dense desires to construct a building regrade, landscape, and
Install store drains and sprinklers on said Lot which will encroach upon
Edison's easement area;
NOM, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Edison agrees to Interpose no objection to the encroachment of building,
regradf ng, landscaping, and Installation of storm drains and sprinklers within
Its easement Sri, upon the express conditions, however, (1) that the building,
regrading, landscaping, and Installation of storm drains and sprinklers shall
remain clear of Edison's underground conduits and cables by a minimum of 12
Inches, and (2) Owner, by the acceptance of this instrument, agrees for
itself, its heirs and assigns to release, save harmless and Indemnify Edison,
Its officers, agents and employees frow and against, any loss of or damage to
property, fncluding Edison's ern property, injury, liability and /or expense,
which Edison may sustain, incur or became liable for, resulting in any manner
from the construction or presence within said easement area of any portion of
Sven building, regrading, landscaping, and installation of storm drains and
sprinklers or resulting from or +rising out of the performance of any necessary
maintenance on Edison's facilities.
�0 0
EXECUTED this _ day of , 19_
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
By
manager, Right or ay an spar men -
By
Assistant are ar
n
u
Accepted By:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation
By
Mayor t
By
city r
Approved as to form.
�_—
• STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
On before w, a Notary Public In and for said State,
proved y appere , personally known to w (or
proved to w on the as s a sa sac ry ev cote) to be Manager. Night of
May and Land Department, and personally known
to w (r proved to w on tha as s o sa sac ry or en<e to be an
Assistant secretary, of Southern California Edison Cmyany, the corporation
that executed the within instrument, AM personally known to w (or proved to
w on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the
within Instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that
such corporation executed the saw pursuant to its bar -laws or a resolution of
its board of directors.
WITNESS my hand and official seat.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
1
On _ before me, a Notary Puttfc In and for said State,
y
persona appeare
, am
M
persona Y Mown to d
or prove o w on a Of o H n ac ANC evi CAMON to be the Mayor and
city Clark, that executed of the CITY ns RANCHO and AcNOA, the d to 1pai
crpurae ut d the executed the if of fnserument and ecoration. to me that
their executed the saw on bMAH o1 Ne Municipal corporation.
INANN� /0/
AGREEMENT
WHEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal
corporation, its successors and assigns (hereinafter "City "), has
agreed to grant to Southern California Edison Company
(hereinafter "Edison "), for the benefit of Central School
District (hereinafter "District "), an easement and right of way
for the installation and operation of underground electrical
supply and communications systems, such easement to run over,
under, across and through that portion of City's property as
described in the Grant of Easement, which is attached hereto and
expressly made a part hereof (hereinafter "easement").
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto acknowledge that by virtue
of the above Grant of Easement by City to Edison, City is
required by Edison to remain clear of, or if necessary at the
time of its eventual development or redevelopment of the easement
area, to relocate any Edison conduits, cables, or other such
electrical and communication facilities in the easement area that
may be affected by city's reasonable development or redevelopment
of the easement area, and to release, save harmless and otherwise
indemnify Edison, its officers, agents and employees, from and
against any loss of or damage to persons or property which Edison
may sustain, incur or become liable for as a result of the
development, redevelopment or construction of improvements by
City within the area of the easement.
WHEREFORE, in return for such grant of easement by City
to Edison, District agrees, should it become necessary at some
time in the future as a result of City's reasonable development
or redevelopment of the easement area, to reimburse City for all
costs of relocation of Edison's or associated company's conduits,
cables, or other such electrical or communication facilities, and
to assume City's obligation to release, save harmless, or
otherwise indemnify Edison as described above.
/0 y
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree: .
1. That in consideration of City's grant of easement to
Edison, District agrees, should it become necessary at some time
in the future as a result of City's reasonable development or
redevelopment of the easement area, to reimburse City for all
costs of relocation of Edison's conduits, cables, or other such
electrical or communication facilities in the area of the easement.
2. That as further consideration for City's grant of
easement to Edison, District agrees to fully assume City's
indemnity liability to Edison, and thus to release and save
harmless and to indemnify Edison, its officers, agents and
employees from and against any loss of or damage to persons or
property which Edison may sustain, incur or become liable for as
a result of the development or construction of improvements by
City within the area of the easement, should such improvements
become necessary as a result of City's development or redevelop- •
ment of the easement area.
Executed this day of , 1984.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
a municipal corporation
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Superintendent
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form Approved as to form by
Counsel for the District
A(LAN,K. MARKS, County Counsel y,
City Attorney Daniel B. Haueter
Deputy County Counsel
-2-
is 3
0
•
MEMORANDUM
gZ.
DATE: June 20, 1984 'IZ
is 7
TO: Mayor and Members of the C' y uncil
FROM: Rick Gomez, City PlannerC/
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planter
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING TENTATIVE
RA - ARCHIBALD ASSOU A TES - The development of
zero of line homes on 14 b acres in the Low- Medium
Residential district, located between Archibald and Ramona
Avenues at Monte Vista Street - APN 202- 181 -05, 06, 15,
16.
Related File: DOA 83 -01
The City Council continued this item to allow the applicant an
opportunity to work with staff in order to revise the project to address
the following City Council concerns: setbacks, usable yard area,
landscaping, screening, and street standards. The applicant has worked
with staff and has revised the project as shown in the attached
exhibits. The setbacks have been to increased 18 feet on the majority
of lots, and at least 16 feet on the cul -de -sac lots. The minimum
usable rear yard area is typically 20 feet, and in no case less than 15
feet, per City standard. Extra front yard landscaping (see Exhibit "8 ")
and landscape screening will be provided. The applicant has prepared a
section and plan view of street "A" to illustrate their proposed concept
to expand the parkway landscaping (Exhibits "C" and "0 "). A Resolution
of Approval with appropriate conditions is attached for your review and
consideration if the City Council determines that the proposed revisions
are sufficient to make the mandatory findings of approval addressed in
the Resolution.
RG:DC:jr
Attachments: June 6, 1984 Staff Report
Exhibit "A" - Revised Detailed Site
Exhibit 116" - Front Yard Landscaping
Exhibit "C" - Section - Street "A"
Exhibit IUD" - Plan View - Street "A"
Amended Resolution of Approval with
boy
Plan
Conditions
0
•
THIS EXHIBIT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED AT THE MEETING
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCkNIO\GA
PLANNING DIVISION
NORTH
ITEM: Ir ISSM.
TITLE M V169 D !We AAN
EXHIBIT: -A—
/o s
L
RAN 3
CITY OF ITF-%I: IM15%,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: A.
PLANNING DIV69ON EXHIBIT: SCALE:
/06
r--,9
L.
PLAN 4
NORTH
Ll
c,
RAN I
CITY OF ITF-%I: IM15%,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: A.
PLANNING DIV69ON EXHIBIT: SCALE:
/06
r--,9
L.
PLAN 4
NORTH
�` ""'
/ � 4
I \yr
,----- 1\
LOT 05 n' LANDSCAPED R.O.W. PRIVATE STREET - 2B' 11' LANDSCAPED R.O.W LOT 40
`•`• SECTION A _- -- " "••�•
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
NORTH
ITEM:
TITLE 6590 IO d�?,EfT A
EXHIBIT G SCALE:
/07
THIS EXHIBIT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED AT THE MEETING
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: 12p932
RANCHO CLCANIONGA TITLE: PiAN V X
PLANNING DIVOON EXHIBIT: SCALE:
/09
0
E
. MEMORANDUM
ail
iz
it
` C �z
_ ti .Z
DATE: June 6, 1984,
19777
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Pam Wright, Councilmember
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF TRACT 12532 -
ARCHIBALD
My serious reservations about this project added together with the
community displeasure with the project and the fact that this project
was approved by a 2 -1.2 vote have moved me to appeal this item for
further consideration by the City Council.
I propose two ways of dealing with the problems:
PROPOSAL 1:
Note: City staff has indicated that the Planning Commission has been
directed to adjust the standards on the Low- Medium density to
limit single family residential detached units in the 4 -6 units
per acre range of the Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) category.
I believe if this project had been reviewed again by the Commission in
light of their new direction they would require it to adhere to the low
end of the Low - Medium range. Listed below are all of the problems with
the project which could be mitigated by requiring a lower density:
I Incompatibility with existing neighborhood density
o Narrow streets
o Narrow lots
o Narrow sidewalks /parkways
o Inadequate on- street parking
o Short backyards
o Inadequate garage setbacks from street
o Streets -apes dominated by garages
RECOMMENDATION: Uphold the appeal to deny Tentative Tract 12532 and
require the applicant to reapply and revise any future tentative tract
to adhere to the low end (4 -6 du /ac) of the Low - Medium density range
(4 -8 du /ac), and require standard residential streets.
/0�
Appeal of Tract 12532 /Archibald Associates
Page 2
•
PROPOSAL 2: Proposal 2 is a compromise position in which the following
requirement will mitigate the density impacts.
A. Deletion of Plan I, single story model, because of its length and
dominance of the lot which eliminates utilization of the residential
open space for recreational purposes.
B. Require increased landscaping in the front setback in addition to
the minimum requirement in the current Development Code (i.e.,
number of trees and size of trees).
C. Screen the rear of lots 63 through 65 from London Avenue by
providing dense landscaping (i.e., minimum 15 gallon trees at 10-
feet on center), and providing a 6 -foot high masonry block wall
along the entire northern property line (i.e., lots 1, and 63
through 13).
D. Require additional landscaping on lot -35- along southern property
line and lot 44 along the northern property line and additional
architectural treatment along the rear of lots 38 through 44.
E. Require standard street requiremens (i.e., standard curb /gutter and e
driveway approaches.
I will be presenting additional oral comment at the meeting regarding
these two proposals. Since I made the appeal, I have heard from
numerous residents regarding the project. They all indicate the builder
has been most cooperative, that they still are not satisfied with the
density, and that they are afraid the builder will build the duplexes
for which he already has approval.
PW:jr
//0
•
11T nV n A unvn 1111 491^1,1.
STAFF REPORT
I.
DATE: June 6, 1984
19
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING TENTATIVE
RAC - ARCHIBALD ASSOCIATES The deveiooment of
III zero lot line homes on 14.5 acres in the Low- Medium
Residential District, located between Archibald and Ramona
Avenue at Monte Vista Street - APN 202 - 181 -05, 06, 15, 16.
Related File: DDA 83 -07
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 25, 1984,
Fe-1d a public hearing to consider the above- described project. There
was considerable discussion by the Commission regarding the design of
the proposed project and the compatibility of the project with the
surrounding neighborhood. The revisions made by the applicant include:
(1) widening the public right -of -way to 50 feet; and, (2) increasing the
setbacks on a majority of the lots to accommodate parking of cars in the
driveway behind the sidewalk. The Planning Commission approved (2 -1 -2
vote) the project based upon these revisions.
Attached for your review and consideration is the Planning Commission
staff report which fully outlines the policies and issues applicable in
this case. Also attached is a copy of the Commission Resolution and
Minutes of the meetings of April 11, 1984 and April 25, 1984.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of the appeal
request based upon the findings contained within the Resolution.
Respictfull hmitted,
Ri cki Gorn¢Z
City Planner
'RG:OC:jr
Attachments: Appeal Letter
Planning Commission Staff Report - April 11, 1984
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval
Planning Commission Minutes - April 11, 1984
Planning Commission Minutes - April 25, 1984
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
V., Jon D. Mikeb •
F r'n+rrlwrwMn
- ! � Charle+J. Buauet II J+mea C. Frnsl
Rirhard.M. Dahl Phdhp D. ichlos,.,
May 2, 1985
T0: City Council
FROM: Pamela J. Wright
Councilmember
SUBJECT: Appeal
I hereby request that the following item be appealed and set for a
hearing by the Citv Council at the earliest opportunity:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12532 - ARCHIBALD
ASSOCIATES - The development of 111 zero lot line homes on 14.5
acres in the low - medium residential district, located between
Archibald and Ramona at Monte Vista Street - AP; 202- 181 -05, 06,
15, 16.
PS'dtbaa
// I
•
•
u
E
BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the April 11, 1984 agenda to
a ow proper notice to be given for the related Development Districts
Amendment 83 -07. The Planning Commission received public input and
continued the public hearing. The Commission discussed a number of
issues including (1) streetscape appearance, (2) garage setbacks,
phasing (3) access, and (4) drainage. The attached staff report
addresses these issues. A new Exhibit "M" has been included that shows
garage setbacks based upon a site plan alternate with a street
connection to Ramona.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission re -open
the public hearing and review and consider all material and input
regarding this item. If after such consideration the Commission can
support the facts for finding and Conditions of Approval, the adoption
of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative
Declaration would be appropriate. If the Commission cannot support the
facts for finding, a Resolution of Denial has been provided.
p c tfner bmitted,
Pl
RG:DC:jr
Attachment: April 11, 1984 Staff Report
/� 3 ITEM 0
V111 V111[111V11V VVV111T1V11un
CW__ o,VO
MEMORANDUM
YI
F � III
DATE:
April 25, 1984
1977
TO:
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY:
Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT
12532 -
ARCHI ALD ASSOCIATES - The development of—Iii
zero lot
line homes s on I4.3 acres of land in the
Low - Medium
Residential District, located between Archibald
and Ramona
at Monte Vista Street - APN 202 - 181 -05, 06, 15
and 16.
BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the April 11, 1984 agenda to
a ow proper notice to be given for the related Development Districts
Amendment 83 -07. The Planning Commission received public input and
continued the public hearing. The Commission discussed a number of
issues including (1) streetscape appearance, (2) garage setbacks,
phasing (3) access, and (4) drainage. The attached staff report
addresses these issues. A new Exhibit "M" has been included that shows
garage setbacks based upon a site plan alternate with a street
connection to Ramona.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission re -open
the public hearing and review and consider all material and input
regarding this item. If after such consideration the Commission can
support the facts for finding and Conditions of Approval, the adoption
of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative
Declaration would be appropriate. If the Commission cannot support the
facts for finding, a Resolution of Denial has been provided.
p c tfner bmitted,
Pl
RG:DC:jr
Attachment: April 11, 1984 Staff Report
/� 3 ITEM 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 11, 1984
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12532 -
ARCHIBALD ASSOCIATES - The development of zero lot
line homes on 14.5 acres in the Low - Medium Residential
District, located between Archibald and Ramona at Monte
Vista Street - APN 202- 181 -05, 06, 15, 16
RELATED FILE: ZONE CHANGE 83 -07
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan elevations and
subdivision map.
a. PPur ose: Development of 102 zero lot line homes and 9 single -
family detached homes.
C. Location: Between Archibald and Ramona at Monte Vista Street
Exhibit A).
D. Parcel Size: 14.5 acres.
E. Existing Zonin : Low - Medium Residential and Medium - Residential
one Change to Low - Medium pending).
F. Existing Land Use: Easterly half vacant; westerly half consists
of hristmas tree farm.
G. Project Density: 7.7 dwelling units per acre.
H. Surroundin Land Use and Zon ina:
North - ing e- ami y tract and fourplexes; LM and t1
Residential.
South - Single- family residences; LM and M Residential.
East - Single - family tract; Law Residential.
West - Single - family residential, Medium Residential.
//y
• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 12532 /Archibald Associates
April 11, 1984
Page 2
1. General Plan Desi ns
natio:
roject - Medium Residential
North - Medium Residential
South - Medium Residential
East - Low Residential
West - Medium Residential
Site Characteristics: Site slopes to the southeast at
approximately a grade and is traversed by an ephemeral
stream channel subject to periodic flooding. The easterly half
of the project site consists of Eucalyptus windrows and two
existing residences to be removed. The westerly half consists
of a Christmas tree farm and beehives surrounded by a chain
link fence, as shown in the attached Exhibit "C ". The
remainder of the site is covered by native grasses.
K. _A li�cablee ulat�i ons: The Low - Medium Residential District
optional eved lopment standards permit single - family and zero
• lot line development; no minimum lot size; 5% common open
space; .25 guest parking spaces per unit.
\J
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: This project requires approval of Development District
Ame�t 83 -07 to Low - Medium Residential. The Amendment
change was inadvertently not advertised for the April 11, 1984
agenda. Therefore the Amendment request must be scheduled for
the next available agenda.
This project, in conjunction with the adjacent tract 12320,
will install a storm drain pipe to carry storm water from
Victoria Street to Ramona Avenue south of the railroad tracks,
which is intended to provide short -term mitigation of flooding
problems on Ramona Avenue north of the railroad tracks. Ramona
Avenue is currently subject to severe flooding during the rainy
season. The long -term mitigation would be the completion of
the City's master plan of storm drain system, Exhibit "L ",
which includes a storm drain in Ramona Avenue south to Base
Line, and east to the Turner Avenue storm drain. Because the
project is lower than Archibald Avenue, the entire project will
be graded to drain to the storm drain in Ramona.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 12532 /Archibald Associates •
April 11, 1984
Page 3
Access to the project site would be provided from Archibald
Avenue. A secondary point of access could be provided to
Ramona by street connection with Monte Vista. However, the
Applicant is proposing an emergency -only fire access lane to
connect with Ramona per the request of the surrounding
residents. The Engineering and Planning Divisions recommend a
Paved street connection to Ramona to reduce traffic demand upon
Archibald Avenue per the attached memo. This project will
generate increased vehicular traffic -- approximately 600 trips
per day. During peak morning hours, approximately 26 cars will
be added to Ramona and approximately 39 cars added to
Archibald. The increase on Ramona Avenue is not considered
significant and traffic volumes would not exceed the capacity
of Ramona Avenue.
The interior private streets are planned at a reduced right -of-
way width of 50 feet. This allows for a standard 36 -foot wide
street. However, this reduces the overall right -of -way area
generally needed for utilities, sidewalks, and street trees.
The 50 -foot right -of -way does allow for a sidewalk adjacent to •
curb on both sides of the street; however, additional easements
will be necessary for utilities and street trees.
B. 0esi n Review Committee: The Committee was concerned that the
uni orm at wi th an uniform building separation, together
with the relatively narrow lot width of 40 feet, would produce
a monotonous streetscape dominated by garages and driveways.
Therefore, the Committee recommended that the Applicant prepare
the streetscape drawing of a typical group of lots as viewed
from the street, as shown in Exhibit "H -5 ". The attached
Exhibit "I ", illustrates the result of uniform lot width and
building separation upon the streetscape. The majority of lots
have small driveways too small to park a standard car on
without blocking the sidewalk. This places an additional
demand for on- street parking. The typical distance between
driveways available for parking is 22 feet. The optional
development standards contained in the development code require
variation in lot width as shown in Exhibit "J" . By
interspersing wider lots with standard 40 foot lots, greater
building separation and open space can be provided between
units and side entry garages and combined driveways can be used
to improve the streetscape appearance.
E
// lc
• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 12532 /Archibald Associates
April 11, 1984
Page 4
The Design Review Committee also recommended that on corner
lots such as Lots 84, 97, 98, 111, etc., the garages be
reoriented to front onto the corner side of the lot to reduce
the visual impact of garages and driveways upon the
streetscape. The Planning Commission should determine whether
the Applicant has adequately mitigated this concern by
providing a variety of setbacks from the street and a wide
variety of elevation treatments throughout the project. In
addition ' the optional development standards require
frontyard landscaping consisting of a minimum of one (1) 15-
gallon and one (1) 5- gallon size trees and turf that can
further mitigate a monotonous streetscape.
The Committee was also concerned with the neighborhood
compatibility and transition of density along Ramona Avenue.
The Committee worked with the Applicant in revising the site
plan to include 9 single - family lots along Ramona ranging in
size from 6,100 sq. ft. to 8,000 sq. ft., Exhibit "H -7 ". The
Design Review Committee was concerned with the timing of the
• construction of these lots in relation to the overall project
and recommends that full street improvements along Ramona
Avenue, including street trees, be installed with the first
phase development. Further, the Committee recommended that if
these 9 lots along Ramona are not constructed within a
reasonable length of time, that they be temporarily seeded for
aesthetic reasons.
it
C. Environmental Assessment: Based upon the initial study, see
attached, the oro,7ect wi 1 not have a significant effect upon
the environment because of the mitigation measures described
below.
Impact: Construction will increase surface water runoff,
reduce absorption rates, and alter drainage patterns.
Mit�aon: Storm drains and inlet structures will be
provi ee ti.
Impact: The project will generate additional vehicular traffic
on Archibald and Ramona.
Mitigation: This project will include new street construction
an widening of Ramona and Archibald Avenues.
//%
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT •
TT 12532 /Archibald Associates
April 11, 1984
Page 5
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before approving the Tentative Tract Map, the
Planning Commission must find that this project is consistent with
the General Plan and Development Code regulations. Further, the
design of the project must not be likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or be detrimental to adjacent properties. In
addition, the proposed use, building design, and site plan,
together with the Recommended Conditions of Approval must be in
compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code
and City Standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing
in a Oaai Re ort newspaper, the property was posted, and notices
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
Enclosed for your review and consideration are letters from
surrounding property owners either for or against this project.
The Applicant conducted two neighborhood meetings with the
surrounding residents to receive their input and discuss potential
changes to the project design. The residents were concerned that a
project of this nature (increased density) would affect their •
property values, and add to the flooding and traffic problems on
Ramona Avenue.
J. OPTIONS: The Planning Commission may select from the following
options:
A. Approve the project.
B. Continue the project to allow for revisions.
C. Deny the project.
•
//2
• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 12532 /Archibald Associates
April 11, 1984
Page Six
VI. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
consider al material and elements of this project. If after such
consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and
Conditions of Approval, the adoption of the attached Resolution and
issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. If the
Commission cannot support the facts for finding, a Resolution of
Denial also has been provided.
Resp f 1)y�mitted,
Rick omez
CI)'ty Planner
RG:OC:ns
Attachments: Letters from Surrounding Residents
• Memorandum - Traffic Study Analysis
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "8" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "C -1" thru "C -4" - Site Photographs
Exhibit "D" - Subdivision Map (Proposed & Alternate)
Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan (Proposed & Alternate)
Exhibit "F" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan
Exhibit 4-1" thru "11-4" - Zero Lot Line Elevations
Exhibit "H -5" - Typical Zero Lot Line Streetscape
Exhibit "H -6" - Single Family Elevations
Exhibit "H -7" - Ramona Streetscape
Exhibit "I" - Standard Lot Width Example
Exhibit "J" - Variable
Exhibit "K" - Previously Approved TT 11614
Exhibit "L" - Drainage Exhibit
Initial Studies, Parts I & II
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
Resolution of Denial
Exhibit "M" - Garage Setbacks
U
//f
/.20
A.7
7j8,9,I0jlljL,,'li2 p-
1 l214fajf—
- elle-z'g<
'Le, aue,
/.20
C t
/2 59 2 �.C'.e_ - GcssicL�y
c.i.�i'ztS. .f/)cL�KNiC.c. GC[G'L. C:,c �c•.
CJ ✓C
G, �Y4.v L aT[> C :LG (` .. CJ� �G`Y'�C'!L .
��{{--
•
._a'X[- �.�xt ..'.c�.c.di�cla �L.c.:. ,t�c.G�..�G .�i rcal`
G"� ��rC
4 YL xC K _ G. -r.l =• :Y��` clt-' ..i�� -.[•'G
✓ /LGtt� GvLU .�,aL��2a+< � :.LG Ci ::LAC
dfL- CCCf%O CEC�(� ZYL G[Ct- l:G`/G �.<L9L9• L Lam.
�'3�''`� =1[.. LL�.c..G[L. . /L�✓GG.:C c.c/xc�. ..GX. �Liwi
oL -71
lj i OF RANCHO -, UMMONGA
IT" CEVI CNITIT DEPT.
NOV 18 1983
pp) MA
718,90012,11213A516
c.-Ca
L! L,14
/11
C c
STRANTZ, SOBELSOHN & ELKIN
• L[ N SIAANI[ ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LVTN
SO[L UONN PLEASE REPLY TO
CLMR S. flniN
G Ln L nnL COV M1 [L Ll X605 WLST O11—C LOVLCVA90
[O�ALOI L[[LN SCV CN[x [LO09
LOS ANOCLCS. IALAO.N.. pOOi!'Jl pl
Inn !eln5oo
LOLn[ c +JUS —I L. cO Ux[T 1055 A.NTN x N STRICT
TA xs N OTOnp AVm n rIx LS smrz aoo
vGO, I" ..M1 5 COFLN SANTA ,NA CAL i[09 NiA R11Ol'J6pp
IGRANO9G xN[4nOin �NA�Is. lVO
CxA9LO -C V ^'OxNSOx�.GA 9y OONALO I. ViOLLTT
. LT,L[r AL[n LN VCC [ NLrt
5i[v[ MIO LV 5 nFLN
O[L. C 04x OOx FA
.y['x�psypl:S Jx LE,- ,«TL„",N January 20, 1984
.ALIx I S.LA.
Paul A. Rougeau
Senior Civil Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: Pacer Homes Development - North of R.R. Tracks
between Archibald and Ramona
Dear Mr. Rougeau:
• Thank you for attending the public meeting regarding the above
project, which was held on January 17, 1984. I am sorry you
missed the meeting or January 3, 1984, where the modifications
of Pacer's original plans were initially discussed, resulting
in access to the bulk of the project being limited to Archibald
rather then both Archibald and Ramona. The people who attended
were so pleased with the outcome that attendance at the subse-
quent meeting on 1/17/84 was no longer considered essential to
the survival of the neighborhood as we know it. I speak with
first hand knowledge, for my wife and I live on Romans, attended
both meetings, and discussed the results of both meetings with
our neighbors.
The purpose of this letter is to encourage you to recommend the
modified plans. As you no doubt recall, a traffic flow study
was performed which indicated that traffic from the project
would have a relatively nominal affect on Archibald's traffic
flow. On the other hand, traffic from the project would be
nearly disasterous for the residents of Romona and its i=aed-
iate environs. Your decision will affect literally hundreds
of people in the neighborhood, so please give this matter your
utmost care.
Respectfully,
4maW s lyBra
df� o
TWB /kay
CC: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, c/o Paul A. Rougeau
an Coleman, Associate Planner
Pacer Homes, Attn: Randy Toss
/: 3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 4, 1984
TO: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
FROM: Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 12532 Traffic Study
CUCA.MOV
7
i9"
A traffic study was prepared for this oject for the purpose of
assessing its impact on surrounding ats. Traffic from the project
site was distributed to the adjacent eats using two alternatives, 1)
with a connection to Ramona Avenue and the main entrance onto Archibald
Avenue, and 2) with only one entrance -exit onto Archibald Avenue.
Background traffic on the adjacent streets was assumed at a level which
includes the increase for all newly built and approved projects, as well
as an assumption for the vacant 10 acres immediately to the south.
TRAFFIC IMPACT WITH CONNECTION TO RAMONA
Existing traffic volumes on Ramona Avenue are of the order of 70 -75
vehicles per hour (44 northbound and 28 southbound) during the morning
peak hour when most work trips would be leaving the site. During this
morning peak hour, 16 vehicles will turn right, or south, out of the site
and will yield to 28 through vehicles. These volumes equate to one
vehicle every four minutes yielding to one vehicle every two minutes. An
anticipated left turn volume of 10 vehicles per hour (one every six
minutes) will turn left and must yield to 70 -75 vehicles per hour, or
slightly more than one car every minute. It is obvious, therefore, that
there will be no congestion, delay, or capacity problem at this
intersection.
Returning travel in the evening peak hour will consist of 19 vehicles
turning left in conflict with 40 -45 vehicles per hour, southbound.
Volumes of this magnitude are very minimal and would not require left
turn lanes. In neither case, morning or evening, will the increase in
traffic be perceptible to the residents along Ramona Avenue.
During the morning peak hour, approximately 60% of all project trips will
enter Archibald Avenue. In terms of autos, it is anticipated that 36
will turn left and 7 will turn right. During this same morning peak
hour, Archibald traffic will be of the order of 375 vehicles southbound
and 190 northbound.
continued...
/.z V
Memo to Dan Coleman
Re: Tentative Tract 12532 Traffic Study
• April 4, 1984
Page 2
EFFECT OF ELIMINATING RAMONA ACCESS
Naturally, with no access to Ramona, the exiting traffic in the morning
onto Archibald Avenue would increase by 16 left turning cars and 10 right
turns. This would not materially increase the impact on Archibald but
would increase the delay in project residents being able to exit. This
will be aggravated when the 10 acres to the south develops since it will
have to use the same access to Archibald.
Further effects of restricting all access to Archibald could be an
increase in the number of accidents at that point, increased circuity of
travel for residents headed to easterly destinations, and, if delay at
Archibald were severe'bnough, use of the "emergency" Ramona connection
during normal times. It should be remembered that with only one other
entrance, the emergency connection must be kept clear of gates, chains,
etc., for evacuation and alternate "normal" use in case of an accident or
construction at Archibald, not just fire and police use. Thus, it must
be easily traversible for any vehicle and if "cheater" use becomes
• common, the area will become an eyesore.
Ramona Avenue is a "collector" street, wider than normal, even though
only two lanes, and is designed and master planned to accomodate over
five times the traffic which this portion will ever carry, due to its
northerly ending at 19th Street. Similar streets in the City extend far
to the north and very adequately serve their purpose as traffic
collectors. To defeat this purpose of the master planned street system
by diverting traffic from collectors is contrary to good planning
practice.
RECOMMENDATION
It shoud be recommended to the Planning Commission that the project
alternative utilizing the full street connection to Ramona Avenue be
required.
PAR:bc
E
/.,S
IMP,
_in
Irm
WOWN
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCA.NIO \GA
PLANNING DIVISION
NORTH
0
0
ITE.\I _ 71253Z •
TITLE_I.OGA^Ttb1) MAn
EXHIRIT: A SCALE:���
/16
0
� 3 q_1
weST - —
i - -
7t 9
R-1-5 c� M VrA0.1
C.1 R -1 -5 R -3 R -1.5
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: - Tl 2 0
12 RANCHO CL;CAMONGA TITLE: 2-16 UT)W-Z TON) MrAf
PLANNING DIVU N EXHIBIT __5SCALE:—
ix7
W(Ngibi./ 51140
TRILT > m*q..4r •
r
oAr?GM I DAL,9
CITY OF ITF %I : 1202
RANCHO CUCANloN GA TITLE:
PL. NNI,,NG DIV61ON
EXHIBIT: r' -I SCALE:�_
/.� 9
0
CITY OF ITE,\I:- 77r 12532
RANCHO CUCAIN'10,NGA TITLE; - PH C�-rjn05
PLANNIINU DIVISION EXHIBIT: C•?. SCAIF: -
/:t9
,NORTH
xh,�G-
�Cs+Cc'J�ES
• ;E
y[C MIy �✓
•
TCAGT 10491
0
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: �'j(" IZ53Z •
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE ta.l[Yf'O'S
—
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: �• r _
_ 3 VALE:
/ 3'0
fAMONA - -- .
�AMoNA @ MoµTe. VISTA
mpgkMACG - 57UCTU
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: -r I25OS2
RANCHO CUCAMONUA TITLE PH o -ro&5
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT; C -4 SCALE: -�
131
• MLIH / //ffU((MP /nq((/pOJ , ,. P\✓'M �'N ✓ 'M IM i �
• M• It/II4 //I ( /// r.
1 Y O • � M
( V`
-� _..... t.: f i If•1`_ /tfal E ,�� -F /` w'n,w n-- -may ^� '— _'__ - -{ a,`I.
✓I/.II/ / /(I( /(MI.•./9Y /4'VJ • ♦ N. ✓•rI y � —� .
,I e. �i1,1 /. .a n w •/
_
Ai =" ATe NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: 7F I Z5'-5 7 •
R( -'LNCHO CLCANIL -NGA TITLE: r2uapI1%I6(o
PLANNING DIVLSION EXHIRIT:_M$CALE:
13 1
u
. .. AU
r,T 1 2
O
............ I ....... - .........
MACT 12532-A
ALTOKOAT5
C� V
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM; -r 12532
12 RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: -Lift pnced:)e, Ti- N
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIMT; - C'SCALE:
/33
�77
L-.j
Ep"
�71 Cdr"
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:- 517C PL-AtQ
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT F SCALE: -
/3v
0
z
,VII
7
IE
it, 4
io
ITS t*m OWN
TO VeLow
p,p, I'gAeie-s
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: - -F 12
0401
12 RANCHO CUCMNIONGA TITLE! C::�i F=Alo I t��
PLANNING DIVISION F-XHIJMTi SCALE: --
// 3 J-
NIGHT
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCALMONCA
PUNNING DIVISION
0
•
V V
NORTH
ITW; 71 r F 6`3 Z •
TITLE F1! N I P 'LEVr4MQ
EXHIBIT;. H-1 SOLE
!�L
i
LEFT
,:
REAR
RIGHT'
{� U LJ -"
7211 SG, FT.
NORTH
CITY Or ITEM: 2e53z
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE : 6LF"266)
PLAONMNG DIVISION EKHIl11T: "Z SCAM -
44k
LEFT
r
REAR
d 1
T
RIGHT
—7
m M
NO No- i
i'I II
• Y unn�[�n�C
1307 S0. FT.
C
tout[
V
NORTH
0
CITY OF ITe.\1: '7-/ 2S',15 _ •
RANCHOCUCAI-NIO\GA TITLE:a,* -AJ 3 MAWAATIn.I
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: k-3 ALE;
/S 8
a
LA
.. DEFT
i m
fimpkpk
REAR
RICHT
x
G... ,
1461 SO. FT.
FUN 4
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM:_ 7r izti3z
Rti,NCl IO C] C LN'I0-\GA TITLE 6J 4 eL-m1Af7,t0rj
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIMT A -4 SCALE: --
/35
CI E
�•�
Iay Y
x
G... ,
1461 SO. FT.
FUN 4
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM:_ 7r izti3z
Rti,NCl IO C] C LN'I0-\GA TITLE 6J 4 eL-m1Af7,t0rj
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIMT A -4 SCALE: --
/35
PLM 4 2 4 t 4 9 6
owc (Tf *14►6 1 wl phop dwpgfT )
WHO TO) - K �� d° e o ABS o �
u
wi(,?- 8e AVA)Ulelw AT H6,49tWe7
0
0
NORTH
CITY OF •
IrE�I: hI�������f�1�t�,��53z
RANCHO CUULMONGA TITLE: —W IaA
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT _SCALE:
/N1
0
I
�.a1 a
�
Qo r 1c, ,°
I
bq
-STNNDAPO JOB WT WIDM
CITY OF ITEM nT Z S "tZ
RAINCHO CUCANIONUA TITLE+ STANDARD
PLANNING DIVEION EXHIBIT __SCALE
/'13
NORTH
9
VONIC M COT WID1'F{
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCANIO\GA
PLANNING DIVISION
NORTH
FBI:�I
TITLE: � A?l f�$/ G I IA )If1 -n l •
EXHIBIT': �_ ALE,
l'ay
I
0
•
"'(r 11614
I
NORTH
is CITY OF ITEM: -r I ZS3 z
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE f�l IC A�2DVAl- 1/604
PLANNING DIVISION LXHIOIT ' U` SCALE:
JJU
li
PRcpcsc'v — - --
I
R-1-5
.1`rnl^ title;
' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO:NGA di
Tr 12582
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Or DRAINAGE MAP N
page
'
�
6.a]' Gd.L6 rv.aY..0 - 1�^JlLJ '[Yt•
R -3
JJU
li
PRcpcsc'v — - --
I
R-1-5
.1`rnl^ title;
' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO:NGA di
Tr 12582
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Or DRAINAGE MAP N
page
J
V
TRACT 12532 site = --
pla_ -- n
1•CI'f 0 -. � -�.��� l /M0Y/ /L"EYUE _(
r . — - r. ,i ' - t r ,.,,. !.1 � • �, r i �I ^Ill
I;
)call j3
co
Fri •��
YI CI.OI
iIS
I III
"
t.�•
f / x
poes Wm MEET boXK 0¢ SIDEWALK (50 L' l")
� IQ' FVn sl PA /x n c �- .'�'�c,,,,yA JL i24 GETS
li
ap
R
a
•_c�'R,E
R
rrnx; ;t. ��r`ri inn `rr
rvt a
. t.r �•'vt v.f n. ry
C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: "Countryside"
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Ar
801 No. Parkcenter Drive. Santa Ana, CA 92705
547 -7785
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: J Randolph POaa Parer Homnc_ Tnr
801 No Parkcenter Drive Santa Ana CA 97705 3,f7 -7745
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL N0.)
AP Nos 202 -181. 05. 06� 15. 16
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
I -1
/48
r �
PROJECT DESCRIPTION •
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 120 Unit Datio hames - detached
1 and 2 story residences - pn vate streets 8 recreational faciliry
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY:
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Topography is a slightly southerly slope of approximately 3%
—Mere are no cL',Ura or scenic aspects of the property.
is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
oc ccmulaci•:e actions, which although individually small,
gay as a whole have significant environmental impact?
This project is not a part of any other development.
•
I -2
/0
C
• - WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES No
X 1. Create a substantial charge in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many?
1,100 orange trees; 18 eucaly to C trees
X 6.' Create the need for use 8r isposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: 3. Additional municipal
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be required to be submitted before a adequate
evaluation can be made by the DevelgprgKt Review Cg1*ittee.
Date Q J /9k�i9natur= A�i.WY�/
Title
I -3
/�9
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
0
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:
Specific Location of Project:
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest
date of
. occupancy:
Model 4
and A of
Tentative
5. Hedroca.s
Price Ranae
1 2
85,000
2 3
92,000
3 3
96,000
4 3
100,000
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
40 40 40
0 0 0
1stQtr84 3rdQtr84 4th0tr84
3rdQtr84 1stQtr85 2ndQtr85
I -4
� S,/
•
•
c
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
r
APPLICANT:
FILING DATE: ' OGNUBER:
PROJECT: 1115- 7- 6-14e195
PROJECT -1
PROJECT LOCATION: W/:s & W W 6DASV� VIS74
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS•
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
/il
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have
•
significant results in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
/
geologic relationships?
_
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
/
burial of the soil?
1
c. Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
— —
f, Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g, Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
/
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
use of any mineral resource?
_ --
2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
/il
a. Change in the characteristics of species, •
including diversity, distribution, or number /
of any species of plants? L
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare -- /
or endangered species of plants? 1
/S3
YES MAYBE
NO
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream
•
channels?
—
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runoff?
/
C.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
/
waters?
1
—
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
body of water?
/
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
/
alteration of surface water quality?
1
f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g.
Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
1
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other-
/
wise available for public water supplies'.
•
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches?
—
3. Air
Quality:. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a.
Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
/
Stationary sources?
b.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
c.
Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperatire?
/
_
4. Biota
Flora.
Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species, •
including diversity, distribution, or number /
of any species of plants? L
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare -- /
or endangered species of plants? 1
/S3
i r
YES MAYBE NO
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
•
plants into an area?
_ 1
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production?
— _
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in.
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals?
�—
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
_
C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
/
wildlife habitat?
_
5. population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
•
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing hcusi , or
create a demand for additional housing:
_
6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional Socio - economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
_ L
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users? `e8
_
7, Land Use and - '.nninz Considerations. Will the
prOp0aa1 wave , ignificant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
_
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
--
C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
_ —_
isy
C. r
YES MAYBE 10
8.
Transportation. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
•
a.
Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
—
b.
Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction?
c.
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
d.
Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
/
Lion systems?
1
e.
Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and /or goods?
f.
Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or
traffic?
air
g.
Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
/
9.
Cultural
Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
•
a,
A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
/
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
1
10.
Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a.
Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b.
Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
c.
A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
d,
An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms? _
e.
Increase in existing noise levels?
f.
Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
/
noise levels?
_
g.
The creation of objectiona;le odors?
/
•
h.
An increase in light or glare?
/ S' !
J
YES MAYBE
NO
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
•
results in:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
/
vista or vies?
b. The creation of an, aesthetically offensive
/
site?
C. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal
have a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
Y
b. Natural or packaged gas?
1
c. Communications systems?
d. Water supply?
_
L
e. Wastewater facilities?
•
f. Flood control structures?
�[.
_/
g. Solid waste facilities?
_ _
L
h. Fire protection?
1.
J, Police protection?
_/
J. Schools?
L
—
facilities?
k. Parks or other recreational
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
/
roads and flood control facilities?
m. Other governmental services?
_
L
13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant resuLts in:
fuel or energy?
/
a. Use of substantial or excessive
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
_ ' --
c. An increase in the demand for development of
Is
new sources of energy?
- -'
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non-renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
_ --
/S4
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a, Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the'environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment i4 one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the future).
Page b
YES 'MBE VO
___1
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually Limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
I,' connection with the effects of past projects, —
and probable future projects),
1
2
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects /
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 1
II, DISCL'SSIO3 OF EWIROIMEN'TAL EVALUATION' (i.e., of affirmative answers to
tha aoove questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
yet o_4v -1*Lrw+
is7
u
0
C Page 7
("
III. DETERMINATION
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
CI find the proposed project NAY have a significant effect on the
envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT-REPORT is required.
{{
Date
E
E
/S9
on the
basis of this initial evaluation:
•
I
find the proposed
project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on
the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
CI find the proposed project NAY have a significant effect on the
envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT-REPORT is required.
{{
Date
E
E
/S9
C �
• ATTACHMENT TO PART II - INITIAL STUDY FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12532
HHdro�lo y:
a.�ie site is traversed by an ephemeral stream channel subject to
periodic flooding. This project, in conjunction with adjacent Tract
12320, will install a storm drain pipe to carry storm water from
Victoria Street to Ramona Avenue. The existing stream channel will be
filled during grading prior to construction.
b. This project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage
patterns and the rate and amount of surface water runoff. Construction
will reduce absorption rates and increase surface water runoff because
of an increase in impervious surfaces, such as streets and buildings.
The existing ephemeral stream channel overflows during periodic storms,
causing sheet flow flooding of the adjacent property to the south.
This project will be adequately graded and a storm drain installed to
carry storm water to Ramona Avenue.
c. This project will alter the course of flood waters affecting downstream
properties. Mitigation measures are described above. Further, this
project will increase surface water runoff onto Ramona Avenue, which is
subject to severe flooding during the rainy season. Based upon a
10 -year storm analysis, this project will result in a 2.5% increase in
the quantity of water on Ramona Avenue. This increase is considered
• not significant; however, the existing condition on Ramona is hazardous
during flooding. Short -term mitigation measures include construction
of a storm drain from Victoria Street to Ramona and street improvements
that will significantly reduce the amount of erosion and resultant
debris in flood waters. Long -term mitigation of flooding on Ramona is
proposed through installation of storm drains in Ramona to Base Line
and Turner pursuant to the City's Master Plan of Storm Drains,
E
4. Biota
construction of this project will include removal of 1,100 orange
trees, Christmas trees, and 18 Eucalyptus trees. The project will
include parkway trees and frontyard and landscaping.
d. This project will eliminate potential for agricultural production. The
City's General Plan EIR analyzed the impact of phasing out agricultural
production and did not consider it a significant impact.
Land Use and Plannin Cothnsiderations
K o
a eve pment n is project will be a substantial alteration of the
present land use as citrus groves, Christmas tree farm, and vacant
land. The project proposes 115 zero -lot homes at 3 dwelling units per
acre density which is consistent with the General Plan land use
designation and zoning of Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). The
City's General Plan EIR analyzed the impact of the change in land use.
�r9
Attachment to Initia( Study
Tentative Tract 12531
Page 2
•
8. Transportation; The proposed subdivision would create 115 residential
lots; approximately 40% would access from Ramona Avenue, and 60% would
access from Archibald. This project will generate increased vehicular
traffic approximately 600 trips per day (assuming 10 trips per house per
day). During peak morning hours 26 cars would be added to Ramona and 39
cars added to Archibald. This increase is considered not significant and
traffic volumes on Ramona would not exceed capacity. This project will
require new street construction and installation of full street
improvements on Ramona and Archibald.
12. Utilities and Public Services
. This project will require construction of a storm drain system for
flood control purposes. See discussion under "Hydrology ".
j. This project will create 115 residential units that will generate
students to be absorbed by affected school districts. The school
districts are experiencing overcrowding. As a mitigation measure, the
project must obtain letters from the affected school districts prior to
issuance of building permits certifying that adequac.: capacity does or
will exist to accommodate students generated by this project.
J
•
/60
M Commissioner Juarez felt that the design of the car wsh is nice but she did
not want to see it located on Foothill Boulevard.
Chairman Stout sated that Mr. 'West has done a lot to have the car wash t on
that corner but Foothill is a Special Boulevard and eventually the 1;y wants
to make that street more attractive.
Chairman Sta'ut stn G_d that the basic problem is that pi is too small for
what is proposed and they are trying to mitigate through design and
landscaping.
Chairman Stout did not feel it fit on that c er.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded arker, carried, to adopt Resolution
No. 84 -31, denying Conditional Use er.it 94 -01 _ Was
Commissioner Mc Niel dissent for his stated reasons.
9:15 p.m. The Plan.n' Commission recessed.
8:30 p.m. The arming Commission reconvened.
I 1
BJ?7 p.m. Commissioner Juarez left the meeting due to a family emergency.
J. ENP_RC1!;!FNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TE:ITATII- TRACT 125 2 - ARCHIBALD ASSCCIATES
- The development of 111 zero lot line names on 14.5 acres in the Low -
Medium Residential District, located between Archibald and Ramona at Monte
Vista Street - APN 202 - 181 -05, 06, 15, 16.
Chairman Start stated that the Development District Amendment had not been
advertised and this item would be continued, but that testimony would be taken
tonight if there were comments.
Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Start opened the public hearing.
Mr. Randy Poag, 801 Park Center Drive, Santa Ana, reviewed the project
relating to the recreation area as well as the lot sizes. He also explained
all changes that were made ' , order to incorporate the 5 additional acres into
their development and .felt they now have a plan wnich would sans Py the
existing n,...eowners and o0-p1y with the pity's standard as well.
Mr. Paag st3t?d `1 conoern. '4ith the staff report regarding setbacks.
Mr. Aram 9assenian, project arn_'nitect, addressed the concerns expressed in the
staff report and described the arcnitecture and patio homes concept.
Planning Commission Minutes 9 April 11, 1984
/fob
• Mr. Poag stated that he is aware of the concern about drainage but his •
engineer has assured him that improvements will be made with the construction
of the project.
Mr. o. P. Capp, project engineer, indicated that storm drains for 25 year
capacity will be installed and this will cut down on the water north of the
tract.
Chairman Stout asked the applicant if he has a ball park figure on the offsite
improvements that are required to be put in.
Mr. Kapp replied that construction on the storm drain alone is expected to be
$5o,oDD.
Mr. Kapp stated that there were a few Items he would like to discuss relative
to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Kapp requested tht Condition L4 be allowed
to be shown on the approved sit= plan to the satisfaction of the City °n;in eer
rather than the way it '_ shown on the Conditions of Approval.
Mr. Rougsau stated that this has to do wit :n the difference of right -of -way and
he does not see a problem with making this accommodation.
Mr. Kapp stated there was an additional condition requesting additional
easement for utilities in excess of the right. -of -way and felt it was probably
❑nnecessary.
• Mr. acuxeau replied it is very likely necessary because when you have 50 feet
of right -of -way and a sidewalk it becomes very cluttered. Further, that the
additional easement does not affect the design of the project but it means a
lot to ,he property owner not to have their front yard dug up if work must be
Core on the ntillties. He indicated that there is usual-'y about 12 feet from
t..,a cure to the property line.
Mr. Kapp stated that the last item is item 8 under the Bng;neering Section of
the Resolution relative to pavement taper. He indicated that it would put a
burden on his client for something that he does not he control_ of. He
ir.0 ica ted that they do not have any way to guarantee the acquisition.
Mr. .Rougeau replied that a condition of that type is alxost Impossible to
-pose and if the right -of -way cannot be obtained, the City must provide the
taper within the project itself. However, Mr. Hougeau stated, it is ,felt that
an attempt should be made by the applicant to procure it for the betterment of
traffic services.
Mr. Dougherty stated that the Subdivision map Act has teen amended to take
care of he ob.em where the pronerty line re3 ❑4red ac,.- sit -2n outside of
the trae t no niar'y t
. He _cdi_ated -.at he Subdivi- =-p ,cc woes allow the
- mpos_ . fti3n .3 condition of this sort an0 _ ',,is = evelooar cannot acquir_ the
property within he ._.,essary time frame, the City has he option or waaving
the condlt :cn or acquiring it by eminent do-a :n with they devclooer paying the
cost. He indicated that in a situation of this sort, the City only :ends its •
support in the acquisition proceedings.
Planning Commission Minutes 11 April 11, 1984
/44'1
A13
Chairman Stout asked if this condition could also be made in the alternative.
•
•
Mr. Dougherty replied that he did not know if the City would do that.
Chairman Stout stated that we do want to make sure there s a taper.
Mr. Rougeau stated that the alternative would produce what the City wants and
what is needed.
Mr. Archie Wilson, 7073 Ramona, property owner at the low end of this tract,
asked about the diagonal drain on the northwest corner of his property and who
had olan.red it as it is shown.
Mr. 9ougeau replied that two gays have been proposed to do it and to take it
to the east side of the street which would require 'less of Mr. 'Wilson's
property. Further, his records show that what is part of Mr. Wilson's front
yard is really a part of the right -of -way.
Mr. Wilson stated that the proposal of the developer is that it cut across the
corner and should not come across his property, and that no one has said
anything about the problem of ingress and egress there. He also asked why
they allow a storm drain or catch basin on the corner of the two properties in
the process of being developed.
Chairman Stout stated that he did not know if the City could burden the
property owners along Archibald with the storm water when it is not associated
•
with their project.
Ccm;issloner Hempel suggested that since a determination on this project
cannot be ^lade tonight, that discussion take place between the applicant and
the Engineering Department relative to some of these problems and prior to the
next meening.
Chai. ^:an Stout stated that the right-of-way should be researched and located.
Mr. Rougeau replied that he was sure this could be done.
Mr. Bassenian asked about another wend Lion on page 3, item 7 of the
Resoioti,m relative to side -on garac .. He explained that plans 2 -3, because
of their floor plans, would be unable to accommodate this requirement.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Comclissioner Barker stated that several things can be discussed between now
and when this returns to the Coma as :on. He indicated he sat on the Jeslgi
Review Coacn:ttee when This Project was reviewed and expressed concern on the
variance, o. r lac< V
Of ' , in settacks and this s one of the reasons that a
streetacape_ has been provided fcr .he Commas, nn's r_viea toni,jht.
3=4ssioner 3arxer Stated that 10- Sees what •e was afraid he "light see;
„Lack,
that is, a lot of cement, orewded 'tack of 'warmth, and lack of
Planning Commission Minutes 12 April 11, 1384
A13
• variable :at widths. Co¢-.ssioner Barker felt there should be sore variable •
lot width and he stated :ie would be unable to support this pro.j a ^_c as
presented.
Chairman Stout stated that each and every space should have a spot to park off
the street and off the sidewalks and this design does not allow for
Commissioner McNiel stated he would reserve his comments until the item is
again before the Commission.
Motion: Moved by Remoel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to continue
i this item to the next regular Planning Commission meeting, April 25, 1994.
• * • a
0:45 p.m. T1;e Planning Commission recessed.
10:60 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
e * • i 1
'K. CCNDIC:ONAL USE PERMIT 84 -04 - MARK'd2ST - A request to locate a
Xthequarters of 801 square feet in conjunction with a light
storage facility located on the south side of 9th Street on
st and west sides of Flower Road (8755 Flower Road). This site
in Subarea 2 of the Industrial Specific Plan area - APN 209- Ae Nancy Fong, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Stout open. he public hearing.
Mr. Mark Vorkink, 1403 t Lowell Avenue, Santa Ana, advised the Commission
that it would be better phase this project rather than do -he entire
area. Be described the seeu y that would be provided in this project and
the changes to the floor plan.
There being no furthrr comments, the ,yblic hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by 4' el, carried unanimous' -y, to adopt
Resolution No. 84 -33 approving Cond itlonal e, Permit 84 -04.
0 i 0 s • \
L. REV:Z:J OF SAN 2EPNARDINO C=7'! PrJD IJ 113 -5' - CAR'!N D_7= L0P.'iE!;7 ^CM ?A'1Y
Approximately 390 residential .nits at the nerthwesb.tiorner of Mi ai'a en
and Higc:an.d in the City's sphere of influence.
Senior Planner, T -.m 3eedle, reviewed the staff report stating th1i,,much more
staff time will be required before cc-aents could be made and req S,s ed taro
weeks time to allow staff to study thin in depth. He recommended h.tt is
item be brought back tentatively on Monday, April 30, 1994 for action by 'the •
Planning Commission. '
Planning Commission Minutes 13 April 11, 1984
icy
• DRAFT EXCERPT - PLANIIINB COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 25, 1984
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12532 - ARCHIBALD ASSOCIATES
The development of zero lot line homes on 14.5 acres in the Low
Medium Residential District, located between Archibald and Ramona at Monte
Vista Street - APN 202- 181 -05, 06, 15, 16.
0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AMENDMENT 83 -01 -
e nR H L ASSOCIATES - Amedment rom Medium
Residential - du/ac) to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 4.5
acres of land located on Archibald Avenue, south of Victoria - APN
202- 181 -15.
Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.
Randy Poag, representing Archibald Associates, addressed the Commission
stating that the applicant had met with members of the City planning staff and
had submitted a revised site plan which he felt addressed the concerns of the
Commission at their previous meeting of April 11.
Tom Bradford, Rancho Cucamonga resident, addressed the Commission expressing
concerns with additional traffic on Ramona.
Larry Lewis, Rancho Cucamonga resident, addressed the Commission expressing
• concerns with the proposed storm drain system, as well as runoff being
channeled down Ramona Avenue.
Lew Shriner, Rancho Cucamonga resident, addressed the Commission stating that
the zero lot line homes were not compatible with surrounding single family
residences.
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Barker stated that a good faith effort had been made by the
developer of this project to mitigate the concerns expressed at the last
meeting. However, he stated, he was still not comfortable with the access
situation. He pointed out that the access had been changed from Ramona to
Archibald in an attempt to appease the adjacent residents; however, Archibald
Is a heavily traveled street and he was not comfortable with forcing the
traffic from this project entirely onto Archibald.
Commissioner Rempel stated that he shared these same concerns, however lining
the street up with Monte Vista would deter a lot of the traffic in the lower
half of the development. He suggested that the City Council could ask the
Sheriff's Department to patrol Ramona a little more to slow down the traffic
on that street.
is
/wr
Chairman
Stout stated that it would be easy to make the popular decision to
close off
the access at Ramona, however, there are 111 families to consider
•
who will
be living in this development and are not here to present their
points of
view. He suggested that lots 1 -9 be constructed in Phase I. He
additionally
expressed concern that there was nothing in the Resolution which
referred
to the revised site plan in the areas of setbacks and street
locations
and suggested that language be added.
Motion:
Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried, to adopt the Resolution
approving
Development Districts Amendment 83 -07.
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, STOUT
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: JUAREZ, MCNIEL
Motion:
Moved by Stout, seconded by Rempel, to adopt the Resolution approving
Tentative
Tract 12532 with the added condition that the approval was for the
revised site
plans regarding setbacks and street loca" ons, and that lots 1 -9
be constructed
in Phase I of the development.
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, REMPEL
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS: BARKER
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, JUAREZ
.
Commissioner
Barker stated he voted in favor of the Development Districts
Amendment
because he had no problems with a down -zone; however, could not vote
in favor
of the tract because there were additional problems he felt should
have been
mitigated.
•
/�
C �
RESOLUTION 10. 84 -34
• A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12532
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12532, hereinafter "Map" submitted
by Archibald Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 14.5 acres on
the west side of Ramona, at Monte Vista Street, into 112 lots, regularly came
before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on April 25,
1984; and
''WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the ,lap subject
to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's
reports; and
''WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence
presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
• SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in
regard to Tentative Tract No. 12532 and the Map thereof:
1p
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and specific plans;
(bl The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable
injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large,
now of record, for access through or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision.
/(ar%
Resolution No. C
Page 2 l
•
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on
the environment and a Negative Declaration is
issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12532, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions
and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
Approval of Tentative Tract 12532 is granted subject
to the approval of Development District Amendment
83 -07 by the Planning Commission and City Council.
2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the
approved alternative site plans, which includes (1)
a paved street connection to Ramona Avenue at Monte
Vista; (2) increased front setbacks on a majority of
lots; and (3) reverse plotted houses to provide
greater driveway separation. In no case shall the
front setback be less than 5 feet from the
right -of -way line to accommodate a public utility
easement. •
3. Recreational amenities are required in conjunction
with common open space areas such as, but not
limited to, swimming pools and spas and court
facilities. In addition, enclosed tot lot
facilities with play equipment and large open lawn
areas are required. Details shall be included in
final landscape plans.
Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the
purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit
shall have the right to receive sunlight across
adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy
system. The easements may be contained in a
declaration of restrictions for the subdivision,
which shall be recorded concurrently with the
recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,
whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit
the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures,
fixtures, or any ot'ner object except for utility
wires and similar objects pursuant to Develooment
Code Section 17.08.060 -G -2.
An alternative energy system is required to provide
domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for
heating any swimming pool or spa. Solar energy •
shall be the primary energy system unless other
alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of
equivalent capacity and efficiency. Details shall
be included in the building plans and shall be
reviewed and approved prior to issuance of building
permits.
/G 8
Resolution No.
Page 3
6. Front yard landscaping is required and shall
include, at a minimum, one (1) fifteen gallon size
tree, one (1) five gallon size tree, seeded ground
cover and a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy. This
requirement shall be in addition to required street
trees.
7. Lots 1 -9 facing Ramona shall have priority and be
constructed within Phase I.
8. Phase I construction shall include Ramona Avenue
street improvements, including street trees.
9. The combination retaining wall and screen wall along
the south project boundary shall not exceed an
overall combined height of nine (9) feet, as
measured from the existing grade on the south side
of the wall.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
• 1. A portion of "A" street from Archibald to "E" street
and a portion of "E" street from "A" street to the
southerly tract boundary shall be dedicated to the
City as a public street.
n
�.J
2. A storm drain system shall be constructed from "E"
street to "F" street along the southerly tract
boundary. Dedication of an easement shall be
offered to the City covering the storm drain.
3. The proposed storm drain at rear of Lot 59 shall be
realigned along the property line between Lots 58
and 59.
4. Adequate erosion protection devices shall be
provided along the drainage overflow easements, to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
5. A portion of the master planned storm drain on
Ramona Avenue shall be constructed from the project
site to south of the Southern Pacific Railroad to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The storm
drain fees for the project will be credited for this
construction.
/G9
Resolution No. 84 -;�
Page 4
6. All existing P.C.C. pavement on Ramona Avenue
contiguous to the project boundary shall be removed
and replaced,with asphalt concrete pavement. The
cost of constructing the easterly half of the street
will be reimbursed by the City.
7. The applicant will be required to reconstruct Ramona
Avenue from the southerly tract boundary to the
railroad right -of -way. The cost of the construction
will be reimbursed by the City.
B. Pavement taper shall be provided at the southerly
terminus of Archibald Avenue to provide for drainage
and traffic control. Adequate right -of -way on
Archibald Avenue shall be acquired to provide for
the taper.
9. Street "A" shall be 28 -feet wide (curb to curb) from
Street "E" to Street "G ". All other interior
streets shall be of 36 -foot width.
10. A 50 -foot wide offer of 'edication shall be made on
Monte Vista Street.
•
11. A five -foot public utility easement along both sides
of all interior streets shall be reserved on the
map.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF APRIL, 1984.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dennis L_Sttout-JCMairman
ATTEST:
Rif Deputy Secretary
me�z,
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing .Resolution .vas duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 25th day of April, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, REMPEL
•
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JUAREZ, MCNIEL
/.%D
M_
o[Piam(Nr Of C"UHIFr DIVELOpxenl
STAUDARO CONMURIS
wexcl:
ApnICANr: ey_� ,LD ,'. [�{�! /��- '✓.��/���AT/6]5f_�TD,_
LOCAT IM:- Ciptl4' 6C/' /J(CO)ra_
/bx LLm C"CAed are comfit inns of approval.
L ICANf UTAIL clahlari Ills "Iinu Inli DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH Illf FO1IN1,D;
1MD1110NS:
A. Time Limits
1. De eloMrnl Ural.• yiVr oral 5ne 11 e.pire. unless «manned or the
%aming Can ,t Lw ld ing pe.m«5 are ..I card o approa eat
e has not ncu........ e.I .,unn «,fin teen (6) moms1 s1'.. he date of
approval.
2. Conditional use Pert approval is granted for a period of
mntnalrears. approval sh, n e.p5re. unless e.teAdol by twi�]Vlannin9-
Co�ml65Inc. it bit l 1.1 mg p.,m LLS are rot Issued .m thin elfin teen (I B)
months frog the date of approval.
]. Cc ndltlunel I,, Permit dppr.Val shall e.plre, unless eitended by the
Plabmng Carmuslm it tau• approve.1 use has not commenced within
"Ili 118) awnths troy the dale of map.... 1.
�I. 7emLattve tract Mw approval shall e.pire, unless wtended by the
PI...... C-1—n, if are final snndiv.— map Is out eppro+N and
retarded ..thin brnlr-fuur (Za) months from the apprmel of this
Project.
_
S. This approval shall run with Ile applicant and shall became void upon
A change of ownership or if Ile bubane......abed ceases.
f.Ito owelopaenl
1. The srce shall be .eve lnprd In ecmmance with the approved s1Le plans
As Ille in Owe Planning pinuon anal Ile condrllons yutelnvd lere m.
1x. sea Ked site plans an.l wmm�g elevations 1.1cul rating al
onlltlos or approval fall be suMllted for r and approval by
the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits.
0
I
Project No. 'SL
1 ). All site plans, grading plans, landscape and Irrigation plans, and
ssreel Inprorenrnl plain than be C nrd mat ed roe c its iatency tar..1 1.
It nuance of Dulid ing permits, prior to final nap approval In the ca
by . nslon lot sups nlvpn, a approved me has I. lion. .n ltneve.
by es rl ars 1.
la. Alpamwal of this rayed site 11 not .Il,e Crania (once wall. all sett Ions
of tam ion ing Onllnmre, all oU.er applicable OV Ordinances, and
A Dla inglvenit i)su.n[. t o start lob plans in effect at the lime of
1 S. Prior to any use of the project site dr business activity being
coammenlivJ thereon, all conditions of approval contained harem shall
be cypleted to the sates Fatlian of the City planner.
16. A .,.,led On -Sale Lighting Plan shall has, e
Submitted for r and
Adrowl by the Plamm�9 Oivisim prior to Issuance of Mill ing
air.I To. Such Dlm shall Indicate state, illumination, location,
height and KtWd of shielding, as not to adversely affect adjacent
propeft des.
_7. All corner r da u c
elldngt shall he the side elevation (acing the street
upgraded with Additional woad trim around windows and Vaal siding or
plant -ons Mere appropriate, subject to renew and approval by the
City Plainer.
N. All Composition roofing shall be a variable Loics -cuL archilecmnl
style. A sample of led moor material Wall be submitted to the
P mining Olvisaon for review and approval pfiof to issuance of
holding permits.
_
___9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be
architecturally integrated. Shielded fro view all the sound buffered
Ira M}acenl praperbes and sired, as re,a—d by Wa Planning and
/ Wilding D.IM I. pawls shall be 11111.01 In bmlding plans.
10. At swimming pools Inca l led at the Line of inItIal deve lopmenl shall
be supplemented with solar heating.
11. te.turiiad pedestrian pathways across circulallm aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to c.mr,t dwellings with open
spaces And recreational uses.
111. II y benlrallled trash receptacles Are provided, all trash pick -up
mall be for individual units with all r,ceplulea sh.elded Lon
public view.
Ili trash receptacles) are required And shall be enclosed by a 6 foot
nigh masonry will with view obstructing gates pursuant to City
standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning
0lrls ton.
we
14.
All ground .anunteJ utility .Ipportenants such at transformers shall be
Ia: al eJ out r p.n I., . of the m n tin r 1.111u a and ee•In aeay
n
e.l corm ulo the r loattnation Of rurnr r Iv ui alas err .alit,
her, nm.l. an.l Iml,. IPm 1.
115.
4. -:et n n th
.0f br . aE and approve.. by e Illy Planner. r
.[ e .,in In. eJnptN Street Mae mg Policy. poor to approval
aarJm
and .....Ja i.nn .d In.- Pln l Tr a,t Map.
116.
A11 to ld mq'S mum•.n and and r v i dual um is Shall be Idenl if led In A
clear and Conc it, mrnneq .he loo in, proper 11 l tiro UnS loon.
17.
meal and rot l er P coned Edon, V l an Tr al is tea 11 6e prey ,led
_
lnn.gnun[ toe 1, act o; n .urdance .,In lire Equestrian Troll Plan. A
ailed eel 1.,o- .... rrl ".I ned—lrnq .r.ltnt. ma slopes.
ph fit is al card l t l.N', renu..9 and weed cunt ro 1, i A accordioc e nth City
no -111 i I 11111 ,t and ,,1 d. ac ing', shall be Submitted for revle. and
approval by the V1.1nn.n.i DiSivnn poor to approval and rrcordalile of
the fill Iran 111,, S prior to ap,r.AAl If Street mpr.vewml and
gral.nJ pl m6. (c (leper 'ball "Aule And construct Aft 1. AIS,
nClu.l.na I. n..., no db liu.oe deuces.
18.
The C.vebann, monnl.n3 ants Restrictions (CCAR'3) shall not pr.h.b.t
ion
I U, trap mg of rub. me na IS. where toning requl went{ for .lie
6epmq of sold hats bay.: burn met. lydrvidualy lot a t
I 1 the
s.lodivlsic— il11. r the option of keeping said a mats without
If app. illr.g to Ar d{ .t dl, ec [or, m lueen+ner'i
'
aanr.it.Ons rue an n.l.nenl, to [C&R'S.
�19.
A copy of the Covenant S• Curd. to its and Res lr it lions (CCIAR's) and
ar tl[let of Inrorpulaliun of lire Momen..... A.... i,t,.n. sublet to
V
lee ApP'loil If t.r Plot -., Arun [nglncerinq myn DNS and We city
Attorney. :•.ill se r. ....b..l .,in this eA, abd A c.,, provided In lire
City.
C. Gro.ln MAnaganen
�1.
n, {ecun ly deed twits and locks shall be
Snhd for ..l -e.r mii,
inttaned nn . -1. unit in Il.n prnl.[t.
z.
S.•cu Ili ..evme. ,...n a, .r...In- lull Shall be 1.11ol ed en each on l t.
3.
All units within 1b.5 oeveloneent {hall he ,replumbed to I¢ Adapted
I., A solar —I -, laatlnq await.
�1.
Energy conserving I.uiding male11a16 and appliance% • required to be
POrale.l oa. an p,.JI,l to include, ..A things as bill not
1nor
n1[ed eb—d .mVlrnn Sbi—, nfadt. better grade of
sea la Hong dour le paned .rn.la +S, ltlnded oyerNng'• pilultesz
app..[an�es, r c.
•
Project No. Z/ S32
S. 1b,s dive l.pri shall provide an option to hale buyers to ,...base a
-- solar water heating unit.
l6. belling units shall be constructed With fire retardant material and
non - [+faunal U.I. rout material.
f1. All parkways, open areas• and landscaping shall be permaaenlly
maintained by a homeowners association or other Nana acceptable to
the Csly. So Drool or maintenance shall be submitted to the
Planning pinslon prior to isswiMe of building permits.
8. This protect snail provide A ralnlmea _ _ par...I of Affordable
1101"'9 and /or rents, n Conformance .Tlfi General Plan M1ousing
policies and the housing aiter14 dellned in the Growth Management
pr.11nance. Allordabrll.y shall be delerxlned or current market ra i es,
ants and median incox levels at the time of Construction of the
project. An agreement to Such shall be approved by the City Planner
pear to Itwance of building permits.
_ /9. prior to approval and recardadion of the• final map. or prior to
Issuance of bmlding permits• when no Subdivislon .11 IS Involved•
ritten certification true all affected School Districts• shall be
tube.lt1J to the Oepananl of Cowsuric, hvelolTMml Mich stales that
bier.. a le school Facilities are or ell be capable of lSerned.ti.,
students generated by IAA project. Such letter of cart iflctlton must
hart been Issued by the Sclinol District nllrrn nlnely (901 days prior
to the final map approval in the case of the subabasion map or
IS {..nee of permits 1. the [lie of all tithe, /As Ulon ill projects.
10. Prior to approval and recordation or the final map. or prior to
Issuance of building permits when no map is involved. written
Certification from the affected water ditr¢l, that adegmle sewer
and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed
project, shall be '.banded to Or[ Clua,lerml or Cancun sty
de,elppaen0. Such letter most have been issued by the water district
..to in ninety 190) days prior to final sap approval in lire case of
Subdivision or issuance of permits i s the Case of all ether
es ldrntlal projects. for projects using sell[ Unit facilities
allowable by the Santa Ma Re91onal Water Coneal Mara and the City.
whiten certification of acptability, i ncludm9 all supportive
in 1p ce
ywal op. shall he obtained and submitted to file City.
11. This subdivision was not sobailled as A total development package and
Is required to reapply for a point rating relalrve to the design
seclicn of Me Growth Mane9rAenl Old .... Ice prior to final approval and
recordsld. of the a,.
D. Pares S P Vehicular Access
1. All part ln9 lot landscaped Islands iball bare a outside
d unen6l on of 5- and shall contain an 10• way adlaTenl to parking
Still (including curb).
9 •
$, PaM1I lot t, zlull be a man rn IS gallon tile, L'Im eJ al
Interval, of 10 frv•t Iets tram the azure 0l omit[. of the tree along
the per coat[. cal ea.h w,Sirg bay.
all taming Spa°[ shall ne impel Der CLLY standard do.irl".
11 � 11, PII can rtas It[[ Ih rnl•J�ler[ in astomntle garage door opmerS If
dr today , I B
15. Ine CorNUnts, 7m0 Unn amt ....... bn t snail resin.[ We storage
of r 'aa inn ,l .'n r. .. mr[ vie nn les^ll'.y e.. tnr aprtrople
rat ".pnr La r al nr Lnr I J I, nb.brt P I q In
iyi .iar s }rreCT5.
E. l ca cap mq
A drt r l lrJ la,nhmp^ and ir, ,1.1 inn plan, ncluNng slope Ol ens in9,
Sn JI nr MJ. LLL.1 for r v r and approwl by ton Planning Dlr iv on
poor to tan, a of at+n ln.nq per..is or poor to final ISO
a.Vrnaal in lire 1"' -1 a 1.1111. Ins [WJlr it ion.
$, Euttrng ire °s shall b^ r°ta.rJ deers[. pnstible. A waster plan of
atu nq lrrx[ n,ar r.,) Inr.r D,r r mra uon. site and tape Shan be
snnmrtlyd to and approv ^1 by Ne Planning Dar is wn Dnor to appmael
adlnl plan Sai ill nn shall toke iota aclaunt e
o/ me ranryr qr mod
p.apaun grod ..... .'rI, it het +rx to Le r.aamrn. tramming Jirees.
r v_es +all br pI,n I,1 for Ir III aremrnl orrr large. shall be
�3. Street trees a w 'u"m JI rn,acr ^nu .se +ran [I. nosier Plan pf
uutd D..
City atone rid
street baet I+r Ne Call of ears ara [fee is n.l^ naM be ciao ter roe
rags n1 ever. 30' on .n s A oil e 41 aft
veil s.
If 50 Ue°t groat r.Wrrtx'l al %- la be. or
nsholi N- al lnnrla I IUYln 11 he de lop+enl; IUS -fl' D a u
yes,
lirgrr, 1112 -IS •1 gallon.
w of t of the Imes plaha,d +LLbin lM protect, III 11
beare�uarn aim t. -dFi.
16. all
this- moss nl Lve 19 lerl m ertmal bi, and If
T.1 . -I aln;'.��mi� nr lanai. rp.n 'In,l . r , , I ,I rn a rnr'r.rnr.<
ran alnpn ill intro's r.•I'. r. rm.a[a of lr' Cri r`nr Pnnr hnr, ua ai'anua.
such slop. plant u.] ".1" include n t 5 -gnl ton r lar•Irr t e throb
each i50 sg. it, If Jnpr a n^ 1 -gal inn or torso r wer. I
"
each IW 19. It. of slope area, and apprpp...le grow d c
•
7
Project No. /Z
1), All slope Di+nl in9 anA irr,gat,ch shall De coral muaasly a Intalbmd In
A bea It ray and lnrl v log conJrt tan by tn< ds velaper aunt it ocn
inJ lv iJUal uml Is fold and w,uplId by the bray ^p Pc Or ld re lent tog
0[[up"Icy ror male unit', an anipe,"101 hall liil factory i[l e to[
P'an. mg Dartu^n to Je[ttmme Nat It is min condition.
9, Al All landscaped areas Shall trash, and wined lto a health and thraring
lion, free ha
—" coi w Weed S, ` front
—' l be Installedrby thetdevelopern inaaI, Manse pi.., "Iledlpbnf prior
to oc[upan[.• with v
LID. be final design of the perleeter partwr', +1111, landscaping and Plans end vJe+alkz shall be Inclosed the Plana. in9 D ass ln�u aeJ cpard haled 'hill far
be sWject to approv Y an
consistency with any Parkway lindleapinq plan Which may W reWared by
the 1"Iteerin9 Dhrtlon.
Speclal .ads,." features such AS ao.Wing. Ilurh ro 1 'charge)
Site trees, memil g sidewalks Ibeth Yertigl horn b� anSan9el
aM .. a Slfied landscaping. Is regnlred a1pn9 SOC
l13, Water and energy conzervallon technlo,el shill be utlliled, dock Is
s pec .1 Irrigation det�luv e, Iocti[apI. dr I[[ irrigatlonl.
Lot...nt Dlint species,
111. lend'uptng anA Irrigation systems required ef. be installed 0n public
right- of - +ay on the pert «ter or mr9 tract a e1 sn.n be con tl nuousiy
maintained by the developer untli accepted by the City and .nnued
into the IarWScape mainteance district.
M
f. bgm
/l. M saint Mic.ted on the submitted Pbms are rot IPprowed with this
appreU1- Any Saint proposed for this Jevelnparnl shall be deo+g„e
In ucrforgance with the Slgn ordinance and shall rriulle Se
initallallon pled Wwnsed by the planning OIVISIpe pr iar to
i. A uniform sign William for this Jevelo ownt shall be Subwtated to the
-- Ibnnin9 01vitid rill th eir ... 'Am and'do"I al pride to Issuance of r"`)
Bail Jinl Permits.
1. Directory g or mmot t o e[tS
.(,) ✓
Shall be provided for +p [went,
e
6. Additional Approra la Rrqu tree
_
be accwpusl`ea prior
cevelapnrnt Rene. seen to
/1.
LL
Approval or lenlatve tract w. IZ45Z -s g p tee Subject t the
approval of _ _ _ 7tl� -S-K, W CIA-07.
H. otMr, yen_,
11.
FpergenCy tf,prii y xuss Shall to provided to accordance with
,dotal ll Fire Pm1.'Llmn Dutncl Standards.
2.
fweryencY v —..t nett be prov Wed. .untenanu free aad¢slenr, a
—Z
m b 2J In'I wrl. at all tunes during conttruc t ion I -4-ce
r
..toryouth: Is,acorm ni..t,.,1 —id vnn . n[s.
/
/ L 3.
n
Pri to i of U.,l.loa, Peals for mnhust ihle s mtr -lion.
r idence dull he .hn tl,., to the foothill fire 5M11nct lWl
Iempnr., vale, inppty far fire proles UOn It avl ati Pend g.9
...vlellan if ,r.lo.. d I.., pral.slion ...ls,,.
14.
the applicant Shall rim Let lira II.S. Postal Service to determine the
........ale in,, and lorteat of m,l holes.
S.
Inn protect falit .Itnn the Rancho Cos.,, Redevelopment Are..
_
any Varl m.. iiutiiin hY le. Ruch. Colliding. Reh,- o[most 411.11 on this
pro,". will ,.'v„r, rt,u. and flip .... I of for, derelom,:nl Plans uy
the A,—, y.
Z-6.
Pero n from other 49— oes will he required as fouwt:
�r
A. Clit"al Inr.
B. C000IY Idost Al.l I..i:n t —C..:VU i,Wp^ , to lnuIRI of A
9ra l.... p. ..n. l 1.
C. S.rn B v.ami (bunt flan,$ C—IrdI Disk, ct
jD. om.r: I.F. DAIS'
17.
Yaler and s. ei 0 in, Siva 11 be Jet iyned and conslrw.ted to mmn,t
rr9Yl colt of I,, In. nnn.la cnnmtY Nilm'r Omslrlcl IIIMDI, foothill
fire District end ode E-c. me cal health @.pirl.mr.l Of the rawly of
Sail lu'rd a,nin A letter VI midi ian.e I,m eeun will h✓ regoi,eJ
m r to r fir at inn.
oulto1RL OT"SINt
1. Ate o✓velnpmnl
11.
Ice ion burnt so, 11 I, to We alert adopted Uniform Bnl lo loll
Coda, Unit a M.,h amsal furl,•• Un dl o,n Phch, ral bode. Mal clonal
f are tn. earl.. .r.lall vale., nVVamb le red"'. onoii.1,1 and
r. 30 Pnu111s u. el t. t is tl. - tam.. of ,,.un,v of re at lie Venn co t s.
• 0
Project No.5?Z
_1I. Prior to Itn..him or building permit for A new re,identlal duelling
on dt lsl or na jar aldi t Inn t w e. n ling md.tlsl, the applicant Shall
par development fees At Ice established rate. Such feet may Ina lode,
but are act luelleJ m: cite Btaullfluunn Fee, Park Fee, Drainage
fee, Sysleni oeve Lgmnenl fee, Permit and Plan Checking fees, and
Srhoul F11.
3. Prior to ranee of building "call. for A nn e.r,i,l m
I n.eutnal alvelapnent nblc.d. lm ming developnt, the
applicant shall pay development lees ale tiro li me PStablished rite. Such
fees may inclarke. hot Ant be limited to: SYtleet W`re trip•. n[ Fee,
Bralnage Fee, Persil and Plan Chose., fell.
�1. Street WJre,ses Shall be pram Jed by the Ba0d..g official.
J_ Fusl coq Structures
_ 1_ Provide compliance with the li Wilding Cade for properly line
clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of ¢..sting
buildings.
_ d. Fa ins lug hs,iiha lsJ Shall be aline to comply with correct Building and
Saline r,,ul.tuns for the Iatea.DM rise or the buil.sany shall he
drno Ii shed.
3. Ei.ltang Seremoved. ge disposal facilities shall be reved• filled and /or
-- upped to consul, .,In the Ilnl(arm PluWing Code, uW Uniform Wilding
Code.
a. underground m-slte Utilities are to he located and shown on building
-- Plans sideri for building permit apphuaon.
A, Leading
/l. Grading of the Subject properly shall be in accordance with the
Unlfon Scolding code, city 4nJln9 Standard, aryl a repleJ yii-hol
practises. The final 9u.11nq plan shall he In tonaantlal cuntaannce
with the approved conceptual calling plan.
Wall be prepared ey VualdfleJ enymnecr Iltentad by
the state or California to perform Such work.
_3. A geological report sball be prnwred by a ryulifle) engineer or
M alo9ill an.l Subult"I at the awl of y`phuaun for 9railing plan
check.
A. A rough grading plan tndll be ccm ed end npprhv6l by the 6rad.a,
F Cuuutlee prior to recordation of the final SnlWdvlvnn map. the
f coal r.dug plant shall he cmnpleted and app ... fit p,... to nsuenu
of ball.ldng poem t'.
•
• Project No.Z
5
l S,
All rights of nlcubr ingress to a 9fell from hall be atdaeled
to tinting ",'I
shall ne eLl
/nlla.3: �".- lei7
S-
AS a Crttsn -1 of Snarl ry rtraa. tit
--
�
It executed
dl n¢ Dasbd am en a9relwen[ executed 9ueranleel m9
for
+ c
a1 M•n It and w {oleo anr.< ensW i&,,etl15
e_ Surety sh
let inn of all rn else die lnarp 1oc 111[1¢1 .,xssarY
the our coq sad
Let
/6.
cr
Renprool a n5 d coxi rs.
(e is and Jo sot main lend mall he
`CCl0.•tl lr
n np of
rn9 ill pir:eh, to the
t- Lira
out.
do by
to ell Per by treat
+S she 11 be provuc of paild Oig
is on
d• +a ison of the map.
Sa @p 1, p. r�� w
parklrg are I prior to Issuance
recorded concurrent with the map. ^
dills-sal -1 Jn mnq¢ water that
p¢rmal, where w wap Is lnrOlr[d.
...t t, tar are
D. ApDroDr'aV a Darce ls, are to he delineated
a'to
! e%S Nit Ina!tool
for the mgfe35, gr
or r sdpc,ht
Ir•J at e[ISl as uan of the Bin LI m9 ana 5+1 err
L).
XId,uaR Prmalrlons shall be ad!
will M used for &J,aamr al goods to
wM r tr.i W me
clrlulatlon al a, Iru<RS which
1n the aberration of In[ proposed partners.
pwrs ^.
ne(eiterY for Jerelerrn9 or
the property or
shell O< r<gu ire
1-r crmsthe
[ pn -trb i� nnl`' shpt- a•�mnts,
«re •d.Jin b.l prober a es, a> to be Insea 11,1 pstar to
that
L9.
Pr it a t< drainage eesem[ntr
final
de Irritated or noticed on ln! llnal weD�
//� --•�.
ymuct ng
Wma y ^'nr It Inc [unit ru(bon upon any parcel
and Snell be
to he
nsriM+ al Dm
porn Dntet to Jrmnage flow, entering.
cosy n'- tur'lect u, o a our Sig pVmt ii
�g,
ri nt -pl -trey are
All (a istl.g <aSeMnls IYSn9 within lu lure 9 gme<r'
wap per ❑lY Cn t
lees rnq oe .LLnm o y +reel "I'll a to which
il"Aimed W to Dt delrnleted to the
re tines 1¢•1.
9u
regulrenents.
the
are ap
!through xi,,, dedicated to the City
0
of
d. iorruTOl l isuan(.
rnr.,lnd9 SJxtY In +ri ran lure el,p oval
al W composite
U.
wean D -Melly
sidewalks ldeander
Rusld
padding pervni u. Ilhis nay be on an iM rexnl
w here!
basis.)
(5) feet In vertical bingos and
M. Slr eat
I!"ploa_ net '
Including. but rot limited curb
e. All slab[ boost In If Ine
smell M see.YN with nallve 9resrel o9da
I.
Canstlu(1 loll S«e <t SMrprewntt trees
dove epplo6net •Regnlrew'n
Slay„
OI S:1 or 9re,tar o,np -lost dlternaU re me
ag ar s eroding
_[-,
and goiter, A.C. peaewent, sidewalk, t of
an all Inlen -r pubis( street i.
comp let son ,, grad
an cnwpleVd to The talcs l ail IPl o
v6 a...in,
aW ter eel ligrret
and
<e 9arerneJ or the provrLal of Plano rn9 Cmnrssron
oItrol shall
a
011 rcral was ht.r sound -la ufor as hall be od of
srdeyalL wsll
Resululron Al. ad -B).
�]
«.e s morn ml ymrrth
11 fact wide dedluled
Vt
of tera9uminat um.
1.
A n m�mua o/ t6-lapl wade Daae.L within •
M cans lr u[led for ell hall - ,action six Ill.
C NIGN[ER114
OIV ISI rot
ngn-xxxwx Snell
including.
ssrn9 Iw rovementz but nt�
/].
the lollawin9
l- Meow."..
an {Yrnrr W nr Arr<C•
fin` l map nap i9n ts-
_
-mr
tn:_ --
limited t
RIVE STREET A.C. •Nml[h
_limited
peibuHOns Snail ere mad+ by
z s la �alenl env lenu[iie
CuRR 6 l..C. SIDE-
nPPR. LIGN15 OYEPLAI ISl AI10 OiM
ae -wav +nu all n. 'start eesemtn
one
SIRf EI
RAME Lill lfR P'M1. RRf[
/_-
n ti -of -way on
"station Stroll ax mob of the folloWn9 9n
—
lbll.i
/!M'_[11._ �—
— -
--- - — -- -- --
5 a . l.litrnnal /<el on
X %C
additional Ie¢t on - - - -_
- -__ --
�
"A X
IY^
a�l•bllunal fact nn
1).
.�QI�D
Ir rev -ante offer Jrei vei wlW roadway !tl<ment
.
al ",'are lf[ets
b! wade fw i or
1e.
Snell
ub required Day CITY Standards and
l¢ re us will pa
--
Uvncr proo+rty
Irr l9aUOn on maker.
dn.in95.
•Includes
I.mrcapin9 ana
5
1a. A lino ogre w •wit or in -lieu cash Jeput t hall be required for the
n Taa nun r A _ M DI ___ �lhlAVlo on
co �NlP�hI.D _ - _ prior c3 n -dl srd. lien or -n.e
-0 .., 1 :.ullu., V vraria.wi ren¢5 I,nt.
�5. prim to air .nrk rein, performed In the public right -of -way. fees
an,ll be pill ,cal , u
ca cnmenl oern It ina 11 vie um al red f,. the
City fig me.r'z Ill, u,, l, e,JLLmn to Iny .11or ,—Q, ree —ell.
16. Street Imprdmrent plies Including parkway treeS and street lights
prepared ly a Pe.l, tl e: e.l Civil Engineer and approved try the City
to,.Cru shin Ind —l.— .i t an public Greets pr,nr to , of
n PI wit 1,.� t. fihat Yl my a.J pm l l les zna II S It... the
lu rSind, rl ,ll ..,, " cat ll,,y la., l sues .i sun ILe r,gn l -", - uy.
1j. a
I. p,rake I,.L L.e , Grimm plan ta• R-
lre 1, 1.ar u. i'.. .n. o, .iV ing r �X1Yq��3, _
'd all be re la.•r.l acre i. rat l...,nl L1 l,I.
approval IFe Lr tinter:
�B. SuretY zna 11 be po'.LJ „I an ogre bent ea cited to the cal iafacn on
Of ina C«y to, inner art 11,- rnY atturn,•Y. 9wvant,e Of camp let l,in of
to' out z .ry, - .h, pn,m ld r Or hng of the .a,, or the nmm�ce
of cu, Id C, per nl tz, n.I, I., v.r ruIm, f, r 5l.
__�9. Slreze ,nya.e c'e, ,tins I"r a To- size plant) for the private
i sheets . ,u be r<g.. red I., rr , w and epprovat LY Me
Cllr EL.I Insc.r i,
•
Project No. J 6-%L
N. Creor,e and flood control
/1. The epl¢ant t1l be responsible for coott -11ir. of al. .Ilto
drainage f.clllnes rew,reu by the Cur [C.lineer.
- Z. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
1. me prI..Ito project falls .,thin area, Indicated as subject to
flooding order The National flood In svnn<r P. ogre+ and If I.Ljecl to
the provisions or that progrw and City ordinance IN. 24.
e. A drainage channel and /or flood protection will will be required to
protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a
Store drain.
_Z5. Allequale prpvl iibnf shall be belle C., "cep lance and disposal of
Surface drainage entering the properly fret adjacent areas.
1 6. letter of acceptance frm domslrela properly.owners shall be required
where runoff flaws onto private properties.
j. Drainage acceptance [ssemenl peed shall be required from
B. shall be designed as a major water carrying
street rregin wig a coAb $net ton of spec cal curb he i on ls, camnrc i al
type drive approaches. rnum street c eel, ohs, flood protection
walls, and /or landscaped earth berms &W rallCJ ,Inveways at property
line.
�9. The fbllodng at... Oral. shall be inslell,d to the San Sfa"tdn of
the City [wig weer:
9LAOUTLET STS -VTV.E a6 AT TRACT
4 1 93� TO EZdt•NIONA Qiz -rr /..
_L 10. A hydrologic and drainage study for the prose" 'lull he I.Ortted to
the C,1, Eng mccr for reve..
o. utlllun
_11. Profile all "fairly ....rzet to earn lot mchullnq s mlary s,,,age
$Yt ten, wet err eleetnc pnwe r , gat and Ieli,donr ,n - -dance .,In
calf ll tY it anJarJS,
Z A11 utn ¢.es within the project shall be installed underground
ad, Of ing can 11[ie$ ♦tang aI,.r ♦else aIS 12 Cy ant let,.
J10-
P, in, to any ors Illy performed m the Private Street$ or drives.
*y
Ire Svial inn.. nn•.tl
a rd .ei nil a non oor.11 span be Otte l n,. -J I—e.
•c
the n// Eng111. )f a .limn to any du...r pp, wlt, ergo.... 1.
OGj>a lI
111.
SYretry L// Q nCMGR7h.
n
IP..II Ir ��t,////Ct ..pmrrmeult Lall Le la l led lu Inc set ',(.Itl on of the
Lty Engineer, pour I u..to,bol,.
12.
PJai'vent Slyd real., traffic and Street nand, Signing shall be
TT
C.
P, I a l led pCC .nit dI II, Crty En g,ne' r .
Sung ci t u.,l r, .p,v ing .contact inn Shan earn open for
rcumlrn"Inn
It ll¢ el nl lr tunes 1 m. force J.tuors Jnrinq or
Itrn•l clown, so -,,,I inty oe r..q.,. red. a ,.h J,PC%II shall be
(
f,y.0 re.I to c , 11, sift of yn.b wig and Vavoq, Wuh chat 11 hd
-11 C.1 o ,gJ".uu of The mn111-t'On to the tel ufa"1on 11 the
City 'C"w �,,•
lla-
ValkvaYS L,all be ie—dod between public Sl Jewelks add m -sue
p,J Cltr fan are a1.
15.
Cencentrafed b a—ge Ilaws shall not cross sidewalks. Wrier Sidewalk
0111.1 shall no mStall.I to City Slanbrd'.
•
Project No. J 6-%L
N. Creor,e and flood control
/1. The epl¢ant t1l be responsible for coott -11ir. of al. .Ilto
drainage f.clllnes rew,reu by the Cur [C.lineer.
- Z. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
1. me prI..Ito project falls .,thin area, Indicated as subject to
flooding order The National flood In svnn<r P. ogre+ and If I.Ljecl to
the provisions or that progrw and City ordinance IN. 24.
e. A drainage channel and /or flood protection will will be required to
protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a
Store drain.
_Z5. Allequale prpvl iibnf shall be belle C., "cep lance and disposal of
Surface drainage entering the properly fret adjacent areas.
1 6. letter of acceptance frm domslrela properly.owners shall be required
where runoff flaws onto private properties.
j. Drainage acceptance [ssemenl peed shall be required from
B. shall be designed as a major water carrying
street rregin wig a coAb $net ton of spec cal curb he i on ls, camnrc i al
type drive approaches. rnum street c eel, ohs, flood protection
walls, and /or landscaped earth berms &W rallCJ ,Inveways at property
line.
�9. The fbllodng at... Oral. shall be inslell,d to the San Sfa"tdn of
the City [wig weer:
9LAOUTLET STS -VTV.E a6 AT TRACT
4 1 93� TO EZdt•NIONA Qiz -rr /..
_L 10. A hydrologic and drainage study for the prose" 'lull he I.Ortted to
the C,1, Eng mccr for reve..
o. utlllun
_11. Profile all "fairly ....rzet to earn lot mchullnq s mlary s,,,age
$Yt ten, wet err eleetnc pnwe r , gat and Ieli,donr ,n - -dance .,In
calf ll tY it anJarJS,
Z A11 utn ¢.es within the project shall be installed underground
ad, Of ing can 11[ie$ ♦tang aI,.r ♦else aIS 12 Cy ant let,.
_1 J. Ut rlltr ease lull amll Lr prm nlv.l mr Um tel nfa[I ion of the urvmq
pn bty epgmrr, a.,, Ine Crly
11. Rr ^toper sfull he reWnnsl4le for the reldlataon of eaisting µ1,11t
ulr titre i. at r.rluu nl.
_ /5. Mr -lope stall Le .. punt r nle for lne mitaliLt— of alreet M1gLl rnq
In �C nr.lAri, •rlo .uu:nern Cafrfornre Ed ton Conpan, no Cb,
/ SunJar Jt.
_4. Pan .,at, h not bn•n rent Iron ell ut rb lrn and olner
in, eft A eJ arld,— in, 1" ". /yyroval of the f —,. nap Per l be
,.elect is a r 11 nn u. nP Ilrat naa pe free. eJ 1rm SLrm.
pr,er.] Feq,rrr mend 1.A Apprr.. alt
1. bull pf5c+1 and t,, .upt a,a 11 conform to City StandardS and
prneA— .
_2. a parctl ri gill Ire r ordnl prior to fvtt phase Sndlfvislre to
d, v,nt creallon of unr. ngnr crl p. ✓[e11.
_ 3. Joe folina nq per,, t, Ian.IU.1prJ par YVay1 are required to be annered
rn to Inc Ianrltr Jyt mrrnl.•nJ rr.t Jrt lr rr t:
• Project No.
--n,d
Pr cur la rl run. J 11.1 ur
rnid
of Inlrnl lAn to form emvnr
I.rn
J
J:r aye lr.rrs rrn, yrtl, r,
en.mr n. nr` rn., r noo, r n.l P,tt
t, It 11 Lr. Ir left -th lire
Iavr a ved In my rl[t Forrllal Pon
Crly
Shan
or Lorne or Um .p 11 Inyer.
• Project No.
• RESOLUTION N0. -G6-SG -9568 tq -1 ?0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 84 -34 CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP N0. 12532
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12532, hereinafter "Map" submitted
by Archibald Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 14.5 acres on
the west side of Ramona, at Monte Vista Street, into 112 lots, was appealed
and came before the City Council for public hearing and action on June 20,
1984; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the Engineeri;.g and
Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the
public hearing. 11
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby recommend approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in
Planning Commission Resolution 84 -34 with the addition of the following
Section:
• SECTION 3: Tentative Tract Map 12532, is hereby approved subject to
Planning Commission Resolution 84 -34 and the following additional conditions:
1. The site shall be developed in accordance with the
approved alternative site plans, as modified by the
City Council, which deletes Plan I, single story
model.
2. The front setback on the majority of lots shall be
18 feet >r greater behind sidewalk to facilitate
parking in the driveway. However, in no case shall
the front setback be less than 16 feet behind
sidewalk.
3. Provide increased front yard landscaping that
exceeds the minimum City requirement in accordance
with approved front yard landscaping conceptual
plan.
4. Screen the rear of lots 63 through 65 from London
Avenue by providing dense landscaping (i.e., minimum
15 gallon trees at 10 feet on center), and providing
6 -foot high masonry block wall along the entire
northern property line (i.e., lots 1, and 63 through
13), Details shall be included in the landscape
plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
/ %8
Resolution 06- 20 -05CR
Page 2
5. Require additional landscaping on lot 38 along
southern property line and lot 44 along the northern
property line, and additional architectural
treatment along the rear of lots 38 through 44.
Details shall be included in the landscape plans to
the satisfaction of the City Planner.
6. All streets shall be constructed to City standards,
in terms of pavement, curb and gutter, and driveway
approaches. Rolled curbs shall not be permitted.
1. Provide 15 -foot minimum flat usable rear yard area
per City grading standards.
8. Street "A" shall be constructed with a 36 -foot
pavement section per City.standard for residential
streets. :.i
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Jon 0..Nike s, Mayor
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
1 ?9
0
r1
U
is
0
l I
A
vll l yr 14 11 nv 1. U ld1D'1v1Yb19 G
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 20, 1984 r r —
W7
TO: Mayor and Members of the C' y ouncil
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Plan er
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
ANENOMENT H L Deve opment
Districts Amendment r e um esi ential (8-14 du /ac)
to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 4.5 acres of
land located on Archibald Avenue, south of Victoria - APN
202- 181 -15.
Related File: Tentative Tract 12532
SUMMARY: The City Council continued first reading of this item to allow
the applicant to revise the related tract map. The Planning Commission
recommends approval of the Development Districts Amendment request
through adoption of the attached Ordinance and issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by the Planning Commision that the
iNy ounci conduct first reading of the attached Ordinance.
RG:DC:jr
Attachments: June 6, 1984 Staff Report
City Council Ordinance
/80
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT W�`�
ZZ
DATE: June 6, 1984
977
TO: Mayor andMembers of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
AMENDMENT 83-- ARCHIBALD A - A Development
Districts Amendment from Me ium esi ential (8 -14 du /ac)
to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 4.5 acres of
land located on Archibald Avenue, south of Victoria - APN
202- 181 -15,
Related -File: Tentative Tract 12532
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 25,
T49T —to consider the above - described project and recommended approval of
the Negative Declaration and Development Districts Amendment (zone
change). In addition, the Planning Commission approved the related
• Tentative Tract 12532 for the development of 111 zero lot line homes.
The approval of the Tentative Tract 12532 was subsequently appealed and
will be heard as a separate item on tonight's agenda. Please find
attached a copy of the Planning Commission staff report which fully
describes the proposed Development Districts Amendment.
The proposed Development Districts Amendment is consistent with the
City's General Plan and related ordinances. No adverse environmental
impacts are anticipated as a result of this Development Districts
Amendment.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City
ounci approve the Development Districts Amendment request through the
adoption of the attached ordinance and issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
RespActfully submitted,
Pock Gomez,,
pity Planner
i
RG:DC:jr
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - DDA 83 -07
Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval
City Council Ordinance
/ B/
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
April 25, 1984
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Rick Gomez, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
AMENDMENT 83- - ARCMI ALD A - A Deve opment
Districts Amendment from a ium esi ential (8 -14 du /ac)
to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 4.5 acres of
land located on Archibald Avenue, south of Victoria - APN
202 - 181,15.
RELATED FILE: TENTATIVE TRACT 12532
1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of Development Districts Amendment
To Low Medium
B. Purpose: Development of zero lot line homes
C. Location: East of Archibald, south of Victoria
D. Parcel Size: 4.5 acres
E. Existing Zoning: Medium Residential
F. Existing Land Use: Christmas Tree farm
G. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning:
North - -p exes; Medium Residential
South - Single - family residences; Medium and Low Medium
Residential
East - Vacant; Low Medium Residential
West - Single - family residential; Medium Residential
H. General Plan Desi nations
Project to - Medium esidential
North - Medium Residential
South - Medium Residential
East - Medium Residential
West - Medium Residential
/8�
0
Planning Commission Staff Report
DDA 83 -07
April 25, 1984
Page 2
I. Site Characteristics: Site slopes to the southeast at
approximately grade and is traversed by an ephemeral stream
channel subject to periodic flooding.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: This Development Districts Amendment is in
conjunction with a related proposed tentative tract 12532. The
proposed tract has been designed in accordance with the
optional development standards of the Development Code for the
Low - Medium Residential District. 'therefore, this Development
District Amendment request is to downzone the property from
Medium Residential to Low Medium Residential. This is
consistent with the existing zoning on the easterly side of the
• project site.
B. Environmental Assessment: Based upon the initial study, see
attached, the project wi 1 not have a significant effect upon
the environment because of the mitigation measures described
below:
Impact: The amendment will result in construction which will
increase surface water runoff, reduce absorption rates, and
alter drainage patterns.
Miti WE: Storm drains and inlet structures will be
provided.
Impact: The amendment and subsequent project will generate
additional vehicular traffic on Archibald and Ramona.
Mitigation: This project will include new street construction
and widening of Ramona and Archibald Avenues.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The subject property is suitable for the
proposed land terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land uses in the surrounding areas. Further, the proposed
District Change will not have a significant impact on the
environment or surrounding properties and is in conformance with
the General Plan.
►"1
LJ
/93
0
Planning Commission Staff Report
DDA 83 -07
April 25, 1984
Page 3
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
In addition, at a duly advertised Public Hearing, the Planning
Commission received public input with regard to Tentative Tract
12532. No correspondence either for or against the proposed
District Amendment has been received; however, the City has
received letters' from surrounding property owners either for or
against the proposed Tentative Tract 12532. The applicant
conducted two neighborhood meetings with the surrounding residents
to receive their input and discuss potential changes to the design
of Tentative Tract 12532.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
con uct a ub is Hearing to receive public input on this item in •
conjunction with the Public Hearing continued for Tentative Tract
12532. If after such consideration the Commission can support the
facts for finding, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance
of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. If the Commission
cannot support the facts for finding a Resolution of Denial has
also been provided.
espect submitted,
y�
Rick Gomez
City Planner
RG: DC: ns
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map
Initial Studies - Parts I and II (see TT 12532
Staff Report)
Resolution of Approval
Resolution of Denial
•
I 8
0
u
NORTH
CITY OP ITe. \I: w�_-�.�,�e `C7
RANCHO CLCAMO�G:� TITLE: �.�7 X11 M.A�
PLA NNG DIVIS )N EXHIBIT: A SCALE:4
/gS
A
o-
R-3
I�
I�
C -1
0
T"IRA
WeIT
ZONE - I : - - - . • "- .I � a - ------
i
D
R•1 -5 c1d DltArll � r �___.__ —I
R -1 -5 R -3
R-1-5
V V
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: z53z
R:1 \CI IO CUCC-"10 \(, '-1 TITLE `117 U -riw -z 7IQ l M
PLANNING DIVISION ECH1I31T:
- $— SCALE
y
i —
C
RESOLUTION 10. 84 -33
• A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
NO. 93 -07 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION
FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 4.5
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD,
SOUTH OF VICTORIA.
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of October, 1983 an application was filed
and accepted on the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of April, 1984 the Planning Commission held
a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California
Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following in ings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of
access, size, and compatibility with existing land
use in the surrounding area; and
2. That the proposed district change would not have
• significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding properties; and
E
3. That the proposed district change is in conformance
with the General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this project—w—ir7not create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on April 25, 1984.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That oursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
Cali rornia Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 25th day of April, 1984,
Development District Amendment No. 83 -07.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Development District
Amendment No. 83 -07.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council.
/?9
t �
Resolution No. 84 -33 .
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF APRIL, 1984.
PLAWING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
De -nn is�.LL .. tout,, CC airman
ATTEST:
Rick lfnomez, Deputy Secretary
I
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho. Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 25th day of April, 1984 by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .
ABSE'IT: COMMISSIONERS: JUAREZ, MCNIEL
•
/88
ORDINANCE NO. Z&*& -*e&
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
202 - 181 -15, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE,
SOUTH OF VICTORIA FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 OU /AC) TO
LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL-(4-8 OU /AC).
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
• C. That this rezoning is consistent with the objectives
of the Development Code of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
KI
0. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the manner stated, and the development district map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's Parcel Number 202 - 181 -15, approximately 4.5
acres of land located on the east side of Archibald
Avenue, south of Victoria, is hereby changed from Medium
Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium Residential (4 -8
du /ac).
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Oai_e a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
/89
. ORDINANCE NO. 226
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
207- 261 -02 and 03,. 207 - 132 -01 thru 37, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF 9TH, BETWEEN BAILER AND MADRONE AVENUES,
FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DU /AC) TO LOW- MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC).
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
• Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. That this rezoning is consistent with the objectives
of the Development Code of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
D. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
h —ein.
•
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the manner stated, and the Development District Map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 207 - 261 -02 and 03, 207- 132 -01
through 37, approximately 8.45 acres of land located on
the north side of 9th, between Baker and Madrone Avenues,
is hereby changed from Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to
Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac).
190
Ordinance No. 05-14-OM
Page 2 •
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published - within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Oail Re ort, a newspaper of general
circulation published in a ty or tario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Jon D. Mikels, aybr
Beverly A. Authe et, City Clerk
a'UW
11
�J
•
FL-1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984 -
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
1977
SUBJECT: Hold Public Hearing for Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1
Attached is the City Engineer's Annual Report and resolution enabling the City
to levy and collect assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The
annual assessment has been reduced from last year's assessment of 543.00 per
lot to 538.00 per lot for this year.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council hold a public hearing and, if appropriate,
approve the attached resolution establishing the assessments for 1984 -85 for
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1.
Resp pctfully sub,Y tted,
B jaa
Attachments
/C..1
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
1984 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1983 -84 and the
estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1984 -85 of Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1 for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Areas to be included in the work program are specifically defined
in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total
area of said parkways being 377,077 square feet. Work to be provided for,
with the assessments established by the District area:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and
usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of any
parkway improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of
general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be
• divided on a per lot basis.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
/40
Parkway improvements were constructed by the deve— pers for the
individual subdivision parkways. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in
the conditions of approval for each subdivision and as approved by the City
Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the
assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape areas. The plans
and specifications for landscape improvement on the individual tracts are
hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and
specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas
include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any
improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the
landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying,
fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings,
rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair, and
replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of
graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas.
/5 3
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS •
Due to the general deterioration, vandalism or loss various parkways
within the District will be renovated, repaired and replanted at an estimated
cost of $26,452.46. Based on historical data adjusted for inflation, it is
estimated that maintenance cost for assessment purposes will equal seventeen
cents ($.17) per square foot for the fiscal year 1984 -85. These costs are
estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data.
1983 -84 Estimated Assessment costs
$.17 x 223,396 square feet = $37,977.32
�
$37 977 32
8Y L IotS = $42.58 ($43.00)
1983 -84 Actual Cost Summar
83 -84 Actual Parkway Maintenance Costs
Utilities $6,480.60
City Labor & Adm. 852.08
Contract Maint. 19,882.36
Weed Control 263.79
TOTAL $27,478.83 •
Actual Assessment ($38,356.00) less Actual Cost (5 27,478.83) + 83 -84
Restoration Carryover ($15,575.29) _ $26,452.46 CARRYOVER FOR 84 -85
RESTORATION
1984 -85 Estimated Assessment Cost
5.11 x 377,077 square feet = $64,103.09
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this
report and labeld "Exhibit A". Detailed diagrams of each tract are
included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this
report. Lot dimensions are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in
records of County Recorder.
TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1983 -84 = 1687
Where landscaping included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 involves
frontage along arterial or collector streets and is maintained by an active
homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved
by the District due to said home owners maintenance. •
)5y
•
AMtMTION SU KARY
TRACT
NO. OF LOTS
*ASSESSABLE
11734
96
0
12184
32
0
12019
35
35
12020
28
28
12021
33
33
12022
36
36
12023
33
33
12024
34
34
12025
40
0
11173
70
70
11173 -1
47
47
11144
62
62
12090
128
128
12237, 12237 -1,
12237 -2 86
0
12305
�, 59
0
10277 -1
8
0
11013
30
0
12320 -1
56
0
11797
240
0
9399
12
0
9400
12
0
•
12414
11915 -1
92
44
0
11549 -1
27
p
D.R. 83 -17
68
0
12362
88
0
12026
24
0
12027
30
0
11663
13
0
Total Lots
1480
506
i10
NOTE: Only annexed Tracts 60% occupied shall be included for
assessment purposes.
TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1984 -85 - 1687
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
Improvement for the entire district are found to be of general benefit to
all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each
parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
District.
ASSESSE14EU - $64,103.09 divided by 1687 lots - $37.99 ($38.00)
/9)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM •
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SANYAN
Filed in the Office Of the City Clerk
day of
197;.
City Clerk
a
a
7
6
W J
W
J
0
J
Q
2 m
Z
V
Q
a I
El
LECERD
--- vssessr,ent Oistrict Boundary
L3ndscaping Area
I TRACT 9267 I j
.n, ,epn,v tcn na, T
0
•
9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE - OF CALIFORNIA
53 52 Si 90 49 48
M RNV7N /iN DR. 4,7
W20 21 22 23 \3
W zY
h
ti
N
1
W
k
9Ila1171 1/_
SVNFtOWEq Sr.
v
Z
W
h
W
h
M I /3 / 12
/ 2 3 Y 5 {
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of
1979.
City Clerk
II
r� Ic
7
a
m c
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
�+ Landscaping Area
I TRACT 9268 I 10F 2
If
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of
197;,
q City C�erk
i
a
W
R
e
0
•
LEGEND
— AssescTent District Boundary
Landscaping Area
- - -- TRACT 9268 �2 of 2
0
•
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY- OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WILSON AVE
39 39 za 27
40 37 29 26
i
4/ 31. I 30 < 15 �
42 2 99 I 31 24
a
F
43 J 34 32 23
f
cc T 70NWOOp 33
\W �
I 0
Wq y APO
21
/I I O
13 4 20
S
16
9 T
/7 Q
/B
Filed in the Office Of the City Clerk
this _ day
1979.
LEGEND
City C erk — Assessment District Boundary
�
. ,j 0IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Landscaping Area
TRACT 92 (5.9
IF
1OF 2
A
N
CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE" OF CALIFORNIA
W/L50N
f1
w
N
i
H
H
ti
=
V
Q
V
Q
S
!7
� COT70NWOOp
h
tu
W
4
b 7 D 9 p
I
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this _ day of
1979.
C;,." 777
A vE.
VB �
v7
Vb
V!
if
WAY
is
•
LECE7D
Assessment District Boundary
"NINO Landscaping Area
TRACT 9269 20 2
0
•
E
1�
I ^�IVVI
CITY
J-
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE ' OF CALIFORNIA
ill 20 21 22 23 Zv
i
Z
k
e
Y
L A G OL /rvR
9/ I v0
4P I 39
v1 I Je
Yv J7
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this _ day of
1973.
city C-a-K
b
Q
a
On.
Q
Q
m
u
u
Q
LEGEND
Assessment District Oeundary
wm� Landscaping Area
TRACT 930G
/Of
2
II
it
II
l
II/
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2
j
Q
/O e
J
9 }
B
T
47
Jb
46
I 35
41
I 34
48
33
J
29
30
31
Q
32
W
Q
f7LM ONO 5T.
4
Q
6 5 y i 2 U
Q
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of LEuEND
197?.
— .ASSesSTent Oistricct Boundary
Landscaping ,1rea
City �'erk
TRACT 930 G 2 F 2
d. B
0
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY- OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this _ day of
1979.
City C erK IZ \ \ 1�
N
s� y
1 R
sy
FF
ICI
II
2 \ "
---- Assessrant District Boundary
Landscaping Area
I TRACT 9351 l! Q 2
r I I -
a
L
0
V
N
cK
1
W = C
r N N
N `2
N J
4
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE' OF CALIFORNIA �+
tl
16
17
IB
N
ti
19 ¢
a
J
0
27
2r
i
MARBLE AVE. 2B
22 23 24 I 25 2G 21
TRACT 935/
3
a
u�
C
v
t
a+
0
d N O1
C T
W N �
•
?OF 2
8
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
•
`J
Note: Rest of Maps are on file in the City Clerk's office.
OS,
RESOLUTION N0.16—Pe—OM IV-/S/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF
1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
16th day of May, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84 -135 to order
the therein described work in connection with Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 84 -135 was duly and legally published
in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of
Publiction of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City
Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
. Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy
and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for
the fiscal year 1984 -85 and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as
set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 84 -135 be done and
made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer isreby finally approved; and
SECTION 3 Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal
year 1984 -$S and — method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby
approved.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
jaa x,06
Ll
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984 1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Hold Public Hearing for Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance
District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community)
Attached is the City Engineer's Annual Report and resolution enabling the City
to levy and collect assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. The
annual assessment for each residential unit is $223.77
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council hold a public hearing and, if appropriate,
approve the attached resolution establishing the assessments for 1984 -85 for
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2.
Respectfully submiyted,
Attachments
;Lo9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGII
• 84-85 ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MINDER
(Victoria)
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1984 -85
of Landscape Maintenance. District No. 2 for the Victoria Planned Community.
The District includes the majority of the area as included within the planned
community, as approved by Ordinance No. 143, including the Victoria linear
park, the trees within the dedicated tree maintenance easement, the trees and
ground cover within the tree and ground cover maintenance easements dedicated
to the City, the public parks, and other areas required by the Planned
Community plan or by the City Council, or as dedicated by the various
• subdivisions. work to be provided for, with the assessments established by
the District are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of landscape
improvements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general
benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided on a
per lot basis.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (SCOPE OF WORK)
The existing landscape improvements were constructed by the developer for
the Victoria Planned Community. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in
the conditions of approval and as approved by the Community Development
Department. Detailed maintenance activities on the landscaped improvements
include:
The repair, removal or replacemnt of all or any part of any
improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of
the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming,
spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease orinjury; the removal
of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the
maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation
systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent
® to the cultivated areas.
Construction of remaining landscape improvements, including parks,
parkways, paseos, etc., as required by the Planned Community plan or by the
City Council will be constructed by developer at the expense of the District.
209
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
Stage One Construction
The estimated maintenance cost (at current dollars) for Landscape Maintenance
District No. 2 for Tracts 11934 and 12044 comprising 300 units is shwon below:
Victoria Park Lane, 198,881.82 sq. ft. X 50.33 /sq. ft. _ $65,631.00
Trees 300 x $5 /Tree -Opp
Total 1984 -85 Annual Maintenance Cost
The estimated construction cost of future landscaping for vacant land
comprising of 1958.78 acres at 1/4 assessment is $111,101.83.
TOTAL ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION COST = $178,232.83
SECTION S. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal description of the
Assessment District are attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit All and
"Exhibit B ". Copies of recorded map of Tract 11934 and 12044, showing areas
to be maintained by the District, are hereby incorporated into the text of
this report. Precise lot dimensions are included in the referenced tract maps
and Assessor's records.
•
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS
Maintenance costs for the entire district are found to be of specific benefit •
to all lots within the District and tha assessment shall be equal for each
parcel.
1984 -85 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT - $67,131.00 divided by 300 lots - $223.77
1984 -85 VACANT LAND ASSESSMENT - 1958.78 acres at 1/4 Assessment per acre
= $111,101.83
C�
J
.� � r • r i t r _.tt � a
- �5�(••.l :� � •'� I � hFFI.Pr ,,i tiw �s v lE�
SCALE .I P. 2000'
VICTORIA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
EXHIBIT
2r°
REVISED 5 -19 -82
1 -09 -82
VICTORIA
• LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE •
DISTRICT
EXHIBIT "B"
THOSE PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 31 AND 32 IN TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6
WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TCWNSHIP PLAT
APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED NOVEMBER 13, 1855 TOGETHER
WITH THAT PORTION OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF
THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED
BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED JUNE 20, 1884 TOGETHER WITH THOSE
PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 5 AND 6 IN TOWNSHIP I SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF
THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED
BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED APRIL 19, 1834 AND THAT PORTION OF •
SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERI-
DIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL
DATED NOVEMBER 3, 1873, ALL IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST O'UARTER
OF SAID SECTION 8, DISTANT EASTERLY 60 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A LINE THAT IS
PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT EASTERLY 60 FEET FROM THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 1650
FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE 'WESTERLY 60 FEET ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF SAID 5EC71 ^:4 3; T, -E .CE NORTHERLY ALONG
SAID 'WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION d; THENCE
WESTERLY 370 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE NORTHERLY •
1 Of 8
VICTORIA
C
• LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT
EXHIBIT "B"
ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT WESTERLY 370 FEET
FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION
OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT I OF TRACT NO. 8369, RECORDED IN BOOK
118, PAGES 36 TO 39 OF MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE
WESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT l; THENCE NORTHERLY
ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 8369, THE EASTERLY LINE
OF TRACT NO. 8805 RECORDED' IN BOOK 126, PAGES 61 AND 62 OF MAP BOOKS
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE EASTERLY LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PRO-
LONGATION OF TRACT NO. 8806 RECORDED IN BOOK 130 PAGES 38 AND 39 OF
MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SEC-
TION 31; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THE EASTERLY 430 FEET OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTHERLY
ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EASTERLY 430 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY; THENCE WESTERLY
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -NAY LINE TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION BEING
ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
WESTERLY LINE AND SAID CENTERLtNE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID
1]
SECTION 31; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH-
WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND THE CENTERLINE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG 'WESTERLY LINE AND SAID CENTERLINE TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, THENCE
2of8
y/ I-
( t
VICTORIA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT
EXHI BIT "B"
WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE
OF THE EASTERLY 260 ACR:S OF SAID SECTION 36, THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
SECTION 36; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 36
AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 31; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST
HALF TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE
0
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; •
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE
OF SECTION 31 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTHERLY 50
FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE EASTERLY
ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL AND SOUTHERLY 50 FEET FROM THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 TO THE 'WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE
WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE
NORTHERLY 50 FEET ALONG SAID (JEST LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
SECTION 32; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 32
TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF ETI'WANDA COLONY LANDS AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 2 OF MAPS PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK
3of8
a /3
r
L
VICTORIA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
• DISTRICT
EXHIBIT "B"
I OF SAID ETIWANOA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY
LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RE-
CORDED IN BOOK 5397, PAGE 475 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE
OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
SAID DEED TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK I; THENCE EASTERLY
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK I;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK TO THE NORTH-
EAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 150.00 FEET OF THE EAST 200.00 FEET OF LOT
* IN SAID BLOCK I; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
SOUTH 150.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 200.00 FEET OF SAID
BLOCK I; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 100.00 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK I; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 1;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 360.00 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 360.00 FEET TO
THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 300.00 FEET OF SAID BLOCK I; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTICNED WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF ,THE SOUTHERLY 200.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG
LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK I;
4of8
,;t/y
VICTORIA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT
EXHIBIT "B"
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINES OF
LOTS 9 AND 10 IN SAID BLOCK I TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK 1, ITS
SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK J AND THE
WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK J OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS TO THE NORTH-
EAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST, QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION
32; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 40
FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED •
WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD
RIGHT -OF -WAY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO
THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 200 FEET OF LOT 8 IN SAID BLOCK J;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGA-
TION TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 50 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID
BLOCK J; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE
WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 220 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG LAST MENTIONED 'WESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH-
ERLY 250 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED
SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK J; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALCNG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15 TO •
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 87,83 FEET OF SAID
5of8
]. l
VICTORIA t
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
• DISTRICT
EXHIBIT "S"
LOT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE
WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 72 FEET OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION TO THE NORTH-
ERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWANOA COLONY LANDS; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT
TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK S;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINES OF LOTS 6, 11 AND 14 IN
SAID BLOCK S TO THE NORTHERLY LINE ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES RECORDED IN
BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGES 63 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH-
ERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE
OF STATE HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY
LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BLOCK 6 OF SAID ETI'dANOA CACTUS ACRES;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY
LINE OF LOT F OF SAID ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF
HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -'WAY TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE CF THE NORTHERLY SB FEET OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
LAND DESCRIBED IN THE OEED TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
RECORDED IN BOOK 8279, PAGE 62 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY
6of8
2-/
r VICTORIA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT
EXHIBIT "B"
EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE;
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 WITH
A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 270.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WEST
LINE OF LOT 18 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF
THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND
30D.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18.
ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK J AND THE UNNAMED ROAD
66.00 FEET WIDE ADJOINING SAID LOT ON THE SOUTH OF SAID ETIWANDA
•
COLONY LANDS LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; •
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHERLY LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE
66 FEET WIDE AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1174 PAGE 148
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS WITH THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK. J OF
SAID ETCWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST-
ERLY 150 FEET OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID UN-
NAMED ROAD,
AL50 EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 652.25 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 800.01 FEET OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5
ALSO EXCEPT PARCE'_ 1, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1, RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 1, OF
PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
ALSO EXCEPT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO ELLENA BROTHERS RECORDED •
JANUARY 8, 1945 IN BOOK 1728, PAGE 306, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
8of8
;. /%
`
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Gi
C
I
0A o
7z1-49 Z VACANT LAND SHT I
RCE.23889 DATE
,Ig of 11
CITY OF RANLHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM •
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0
Gerr der r � •.
O
O
(D ...
O
O
63
O
•
Ole
3889 7 -Zl -B� ` VACANT LAND IS"T 2
RCE. 2 DATE 14 OF 11
�O
O ...
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
C.11 LO G) I O OO O O
II .M
I' B
4 ,f Govt Lot 3 i# Govt Lot 2
J Z/- Pz SHT '5
VACANT LAND
4889 DATE a;L OF II
�
s
-
a
s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. •
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
•
VACANT LAND SNT
DATE
I
I;/ OF 11
0
e
c"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA
_ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRAI
l 1F1 I I 11934•
7-Z / -92 I I 5
VACANT LAND
9 DATE OF 11
l
„•�
j
l l l
1'"+
lei
r
E
j Oor orl
orUfa
7-Z / -92 I I 5
VACANT LAND
9 DATE OF 11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
o o II +e
TRACT �.IZOi4fo lr-- E
j o
0
TRACT i 12045
1_ e
1
I
TRACT 12044 ^T
•
VACANT LAND SHT I.
LL D HUjrC_lTf ENGINEER RCE.23859 DATE 213 OF II
i
i_
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
j
TRACT 12044
� I
I TRbCT � I 11934• F� '
7 7
Ei
7-V-0 z. VACANT LAND SHT ,
23889 DATE
day OF 11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
•
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO,
CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
lei
•I
I �Ipia
yGj
�
'S
•
I
I
• I
�
,�
..ff•1f11R•f•�RnM
�
� I i i
�
••, a .! .. � e-
A
G
-
Sto
I
Lu
e
Cerr. Lyr e ------
\ - - - - --
1•
1
f
�• Or
•®
�i.
,..•
uc .n
I O
co
I
••t_
9
i
q
if
I N • . �
•r. lrt
�
„`
�..
<
..,r
r• ..,,era
.r �I • r
- ---'..t_ ,
�.. Iy
kq • .e
I
o • n rH
I
• u •� u
•�{ i
7 -L/ 8z
SHT e
VACANT LAND
YD HU, CITY INEER RCE.23689 DATE
OF 11
t
l0.3 .1C
Q II
I�
I
Z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Na
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
EE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LC IJ-
................... I
___ I
W.r W • 71-T--
e tar ! �i , a • .
Gnl L✓ S C C.rl Ld 6
1�
Go.l Loei 6 n..x � Gat Ld 1
`N I rr { O n `•O Ir � I�"
s rt ip • rt f rt
�� . i, • � i • n '�' \. � ' —� X11— �'1 —�'i .1_:
4 n
SNT 9
EER a7 oaTEs� VACANT LAND
6
7
a
s9 AC
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNO. •
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
,�•
a f..,ra
n� :i \..,,• �\ -
IT
•_\"'9
�,•„y
ICJ. -, 'M I- ue1-
_\• _
__ \_I _�_•. _n__� -, 1'x-1
—•_
_i1 I� • I +
I
I •
I•
.
1
LI. \-
n � • n
•
• • I n
•
J
• n
�
1 •
aa . I n
H ) •
j )
• 1'I ) I 4
leF I
1
J ,
w
e
n
I
_ �.
•rn
I
w ..« •.n M
I
4
rl o
-T
• jl
•
,e • rep
u • u1
I •
1
•
a • I a~
•~
�_�M1 — �_I_~
—.
—y�� —rat
_��_r
7.
......_.._.
I • V 1 n
1
w
I «
� • 11
b a • a �
e n
_ —
ll II IKR
• C�/ y1.
uw ,•opreru � � elw
e
O O O
•
—1 7"1 -1 I VACANT LAND ISHT10
23689 DATE
�� OF 11
3
L 9x
—
Y
JI
�1 .
:• }
Jlt
�
w
9LV0, Iroon.0
3
N
3 i .D
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
n a
i r
'Z /`8-Z VACANT LAND I 5HT. "
DATE \ ,,� OF 11
e
�
I:
N
3 i .D
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
n a
i r
'Z /`8-Z VACANT LAND I 5HT. "
DATE \ ,,� OF 11
t-
9!
CITY OF R;A NCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
COUNTY CF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE CF CALIFORNIA
T2 3 .I_ _ _ 9
VWIGOLp CDIRi
:45MINF COORi
ZQ
TREc MAGVr =' „gNGE D,VLY
61?01,N0 ¢ T2 =E MA //VrENAVe
0.15 PLACE r
6p
9
T
77
17
III
^6
6
32
j
n'C2
6
.9 2C
99
70 it
72
'a
�u
21
:45MINF COORi
ZQ
TREc MAGVr =' „gNGE D,VLY
61?01,N0 ¢ T2 =E MA //VrENAVe
0.15 PLACE r
6p
9
T
77
31
/
^6
32
j
6
33
70 it
72
'a
�u
34
13
F5
36
w (dOCL6 CpLRi
8
a �
77
/
E6
67
66
69
36
u
63626160
,G
z�
11
akwuM
?LACE
z
42
c 5a
vw3i
15
I it � I c9 y
`�L TRACT N0. 1 1934 BHT i
*0YOSS, TY ENGINEER RCE. 23889 GATE
OF f
i
CITY
OF SM NGA
ENT DIAGRAM
I"
c MANTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
JNTY OF SAN 9ERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT N0. 12044IOF 4
( CITY OF RV ICHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TREE MA/NrE.VANCE ONLY
\\\ \� 69041N0 E r,¢EE MA /,VTE, -VANCc
2-!'41-5 I TRACT NO, 12045 I SHT 3
RCE. 23889 DATE
-- —I IOF +
1 12/
•
CITY OF RA;^'CHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
. TREE MA/NrENANCE ONLY
N�WNX 6ROUN0 s I-IZEE MA /NTENANCE
TRACT N0. 12046ISHT ¢
!9 DATE
OF ¢
2 31-
( VICTORIA i
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT
EXHIBIT "B"
ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE
NORTHERWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT -OF -NAY OF HIGHWAY 31; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 230 FEET OF THE EAST 380 FEET
OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS.
ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 218 FEET OF THE EAST 368
FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWAANOA COLONY LANDS.
ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 14 IN BLOCK J OF SAID ETI'WANDA COLONY
LANDS, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 330 FEET
OF SAID LOT.
ALSO EXCEPT LOTS 21,22,23,24,29,30,31,32 AND THE EAST HALF OF LOT 28 OF
ORAVGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS PAGE 1 RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY.
ALSO EXCEPT LOTS 10,11,12,13,14 AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 9 OF ORANGE
EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, P -,E 1, RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY LYING WESTERLY OF THE 'WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32.
ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 19 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY LYING •
7of8
-� 33
•
RESOLUTION NO. Or-ZU -*W ?Y- / � ;L-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
1984 -85 PURSUANT TO- THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF
1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
16th day of May, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84 -137 to order
the therein described work in connection with Landscape Maintenance District
No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 84 -137 was duly and legally published
in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of
Publiction of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City
Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
• Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy
and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for
the fiscal year 1984 -85 and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as
set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 84 -137 be done and
made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer is ere y finally approved; and
SECTION 3 Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal
year 1984—gS- —and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby
approved.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
7 as
Jon D. Mike s, Mayor
a.3Y
u
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984 -
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
, �n /;nom
i C . . �,.�
1977
SUBJECT: Hold Public Hearing for Annual Assessment for Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2 and 3
Attached are City Engineer's Annual Reports and Resolutions enabling the City
to levy and collect assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos.
1, 2 and 3. The annual assessment for Street Lighting Maintenance District
No. 1 is 59.64. The annual assessment for Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 2 is $33.93. The annual assessment for Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 3 is $55.90.
These assessments will cover about $35,000 of the City's annual lighting bill
of over $400,000.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council hold a public hearing and, if appropriate,
approve the attached resolutions establishing the assessments for 1984 -85 for
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
t Resp ctfully sub ted,
y /
Y
L :j
Attachments
131
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1984 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compl'ance with the requirement of Article
4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year
1984 -85 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts enumerated in
Exhibit A within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is
specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment
Diagrams. work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the
District are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and
usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light
improvements on arterial and certain collector streets.
Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all
areas in the District and cost shall be devided on a per lot
• basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership
only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to
benefit the same as a lot.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared
by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the
conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City
Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or
development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the
street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting
improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report
to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district
include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part
of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the
subject area.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement
construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on
available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes
S will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1984 -85. These costs are
estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data.
;34.
1984 -85 Estimated Assessment •
1. S.C.E. Ma ntenance an Energy:
Lamp ize uantit Rate"
9WUL
5800L 51 8.82
*High Pressure Sodium Vapor
Lamps Rate Months Total
54 x 9.95 x 12 f 6,447.60
51 z 8.82 x 12 f 5397.84
' ,
2. Incidental Expenses:
Engineering and Administration = 111,000.00
3. Costs per dwelling unit:
Total Annual Estimated Costs: 1111 845.44 + S1 000 = S9.64 /year /unit
No. of Units in District
$9.64 divided by 12 = 50.80 /mo. /unit •
Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6.
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this
report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 111. These
diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to
all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for
each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of
assessable land,- the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional
to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel.
It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
District.
•
23%
(56 P 5800L)
:�3a
LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1
Arterial (all
developments)
Formation:
10. OF
TRACT
DWELLING UNITS
ARTERIAL LIGHTS
T6471
�-
�-
9539
19
1
9584
52
0
9584 -1
47
12
9584 -2
45
0
10569
42
0
9638
25
8
11350
114
7
11609
12
4
9441
72
0
11696
6
0
10762
84
5
10277 -1
8
2
9269
53
13
11663
13
2
12019
35
2
12020
28
3
12021
33
4
•
12022
36
4
12040
328
10
9658
52
4
11734
144
6
12090
128
7
10045
10
0
10045 -1
16
3
TOTALS
1422 113
68 P 9500E
45 P 58DOL
Annexation No. 1
12023
33
0
12024
34
0
12025
40
0
12184
32
0
11173 -1
70
5
9500L
11173
47
8
9500L
11144
62
2
9500L
12237
12237 -1
86
10
5800L
12237 -2
12305
59
1
9500L
I
5800L
®
TOTALS
1885
140 (84 0 9500L)
(56 P 5800L)
:�3a
A35
Lighting District No.
1 (cont.)
ANNEXATION NO. 2
Tract
No. of Units
Arterial
Lights
11797
240 Condos.
11
9500L
12320 -1
56 Condos.
4
9500L
2
5800L
11013
30 S.F.
3
5800L
un its
�d
TOTALS
2211
160 (99 P 9500L)
(61 2 58001.)
ANNEXATION NO. 3
9399
12, S.F.
4
5800
9400
12 S.F.
12414
92 S.F.
7
5800
11915 -1
44 S.F.
8
5800
11549 -1
27 S.F.
4
5800
12362
88 Condos.
3
9500
2
5800
12026
24 Condos,
2
5800
12027
30 Condos.
4
5800
•
D.R. 83 -17
'8 " ts.
3
5800
3 units
37
TOTALS
2608
197 (102 E 95001)
( 95 Q 5800L)
A35
RESOLUTION NO. 96 20.0te Q`/ —/83
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
16th day of May, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84 -139 to order
the therein described work in connection with Street Lighting Maintenance
District No 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 84 -139 was duly and legally
published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the
Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office
of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
oral and documentary concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience required the levy
• and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No.
1 for the fiscal year 1984 -85, and said City Council orders that the work, as
set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 84 -139, be done
and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it futher resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer, as amenTeed by the City Council, is hereby finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal
year 1984795 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report, as amended by
the City Council, are hereby approved.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
jaa
Jon O. Mike s, Mayor
yyo
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA
• 1984 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article
4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19]2).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year
1984 -85 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for Tracts enumerated in
Exhibit A within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is
specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment
Diagrams. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the
District are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and
usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light
improvements on arterial and certain collector streets.
Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all
areas in the District and cost shall be devided on a per lot
basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership
• only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to
benefit the same as a lot.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared
by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the
conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City
Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or
development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the
street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting
nprovement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report
to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district
include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part
of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the
subject area.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement
construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on
available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes
will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1984 -85. These costs are
estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data.
.-�y/
1984 -85 Estimated Assessment •
1. .C. Maintenance an nergy:
amQ ize Quantity ate*
38dbL 74 ts.az —
*High Pressure Sodium vapor
* *SCE Schedule LS -1. All night service per lamp
per month, effective 1 -1 -84
Lamps Rate Months Total
72 x 8.82 x 12 $7,620.45
2. Incidental Expenses:
Engineering and Administration = $1,000.00
3. Costs per dwelling unit:
Total Annual Estimated Costs: $70.4
5 + $1 ' 000 533.93 /year /unit
No, o units to istr ict Gnu
$33.93 divided by 12 = $2.82/mo. /unit
Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6. •
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this
report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 211. These
diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to
all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for
each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of
assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional
to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel.
District. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
•
iy `
152
193
204
252
LIGHTING DISTRICT NO.
2
•
(development
with local lights
only)
Formation:
-
TRACT
Ibd9t
NO. OF DWELLING UNITS
LOCAL LIGHTS
�-
9539
19
4
9584
52
15
9584 -1
47
19
9584 -2
45
15
10569
42
11
9638
25
11
11609
12
4
9441
72
32
11696
6
1
9269
5�.
15
9658
52
9
10045
10
5
10045 -1
16
7
TOTALS
473
•
Annexation No.
1
12184
32
11
12237
12273 -1
86
30
12237.2
TOTALS
591
Annexation No.
2
11013
30
11
TOTALS
621
Annexation No.
3
9399
12
S.F.
4
9400
12
S.F.
4
12414
92
S.F.
24
11549 -1
27
S.F.
16
T4T-
TOTALS
764
•
.2 Y3
152
193
204
252
RESOLUTION NO. 4 -20rOM g'/'7 3y
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 198485 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
16th day of May, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84 -141 to order
the therein described work in connection with Street Lighting Maintenance
District No 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 84 -141 was duly and legally
published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the
Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office
of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
oral and documentary concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
• Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience required the levy
and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No.
2 for the fiscal year 1984 -85, and said City Council orders that the work, as
set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 84 -141, be done
and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it futher resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer, as amended by the City Council, is hereby finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal
year 198485 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report, as amended by
the City Council, are hereby approved.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet,--Clty--CTe—rV
jaa
Jon 0. Mikels, mayor
x91/
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1984 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
4, Chapter This 1, report
Diivision 15 of eStreets manda Highways Code a State eof California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year
1984 -85 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract Nos. 11934 and
12044 within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is
specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment
Diagrams. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the
District are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and
usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light
improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general
benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided
• on a per dwelling unit basis.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
�1
U
The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared
by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the
conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City
Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and
the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas.
The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual
tracts are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said
plans and specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district
include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part
of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the
subject area.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement
construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based On
available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes
will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1984 -85, These costs are
estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data.
zvr
1984 -85 Estimated Assessment
1. S.C.E. Maintenance an nergy:
Lam 5 Size* Quantity Rate**
d. dz--
*Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor
* *SCE Schedule LS -1. All night service per lamp
per month. Effective 1 -1 -84
Lamps Rate Months Total
149 x 8.82 x 12 $15,770.16
2. Incidental Expenses:
Engineering and Administration = $1,000.00
3. Costs per dwelling unit:
Total Annual Estimated Costs: $15,770.60 + $1,000 = 555.90 /year /unit
No. o Units in istrict
•
$55.90 divided by 12 = S4.66 /mo. /unit •
Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6.
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this
report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 ". These
diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to
all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for
each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of
assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional
to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel.
District. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
•
144.
RESOLUTION NO. 46- 28�99CR fy— /8S
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 .PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY )
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
16th day of May, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84 -143 to order
the therein described work in connection with Street Lighting Maintenance
District No 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 84 -143 was duly and legally
published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the
Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office
of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
oral and documentary concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience required the levy
and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No.
3 for the fiscal year 1984 -85, and said City Council orders that the work, as
set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 84 -143, be done
and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it futher resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer, as amended by the City Council, is hereby finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal
year 1984 -95 ana method of assessment in the Engineer's Report, as amended by
the City Council, are hereby approved.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. AutheTet, r[y C erk
jaa
Jon O. Mi a s, Mayor
:.4 7
•
•
IiiTt111L1 L] , \T/TTTl� AT1l� A %S^%Tn
STAFF REPORT ��r; ,
x
F � 2
ii
DATE: June 20, 1984 1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Ordering the Work in Connection with the Formation of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 5 within Tract No. 11915 -1 located at the
northeast corner of Turner Avenue and 26th Street
Lebrett Homes, Inc. developer of Tract No. 11915 -1 a subdivision of 44 units
located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and 26th Street, has
requested the formation of a landscape maintenance district for the open space
areas within the project. Attached for approval is a resolution ordering the
work in connection with Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 and approving the
Engineer's Report. The units within the district will be assessed for the
open space areas with the City being responsible for the maintenance. All
improvements will be installed by the developer. The areas to be maintained
are shown on Exhibit "A" of the Engineer's Report.
Total annual maintenance costs are estimated as follows:
Per open space and tot tot $0.30 x 24,000 s.f. = $7,200
Per unit annual assessment $7,200 - 44 = $163.64
Per unit monthly assessment $163.64 - 12 = $ 13.64
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the
work to be done for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign same.
*HJ submi J j
Attachments
�Y �
7r" Lebrett Homes Inc.
2102 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 151 IRVINE, CA 92715 (7141 833 -2014
P �
March 23, 1984 D
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 -C Base Line Road CITY C: i,HGriJ CL'C;'.1GfIC:�
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9;G;1:EEN1hG
ATTN: Barbara
RE: Landscape Maintenance District - Tract 11915 -1
Dear Barbara:
Lebrett Homes Inc. hereby requests the formation of a
Landscape Maintenance District to include the open space
areas of Tract 11915 -1.
• Sincerely yours,
Peter R. Hubina_er
President
PRH:_ h
u
.z49
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. General Description
The report deals with the establishment of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 5 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Area to be included in the work
program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached
Assessment Diagram. The total area being 720,700 square feet (open space),
and a tot lot located on Lot C and consisting of 3,300 square feet. Work to
be provided for, with the assessments established by the District, are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operating and servicing of any parkway and tot lot
improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to
all units in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis.
• SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications for the parkway, open space and tot lot are
to be prepared by the developer. The plans and specifications are as
stipulated in the conditions of approval and as approved by the City Engineer
and City Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract
Map and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape area.
The plans and specifications for landscape improvements n the individual lots
are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and
specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities include:
The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement,
to include landscaping, and tot lot, providing for life, growth, health
and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation,
trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the
removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the
maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems
and tot lot equipment.
SECTION 4. Estimated Costs
No casts will be incurred for improvement construction. All improvements
will be constructed by developers. Based on data from other cities, contract
analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs
for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) per square foot per year per
open space and tot lot. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment
will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape
Maintenance District No. 5 comprised of 44 units and per unit costs are shown:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost: •
Open Space and Tot Lot 0.30 x 24,000 = 7,200
Per Unit Annual Assessment 7,200 divided by 44 = 163.64
Per Unit Monthly Assessment = 13.64
Assessment shall apply to each unit as enumerated in Section 6 and the
attached Assessment Diagram.
SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram
A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and
labeled "Exhibit A ".
SECTION 6. Assessment
Improvement for for the entire district is found to be of general benefit
to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each
parcel.
SECTION 7. Order of Events
1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's .
Report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets
public hearing date.
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
:"-5,1
I ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
• LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,�IONGA
TRACT 11915.1
� ENGINEERING DIVISION
ERHIBIT "A"
€ N1m VICINITY MAP
page
I
P
20 21 22i �'.nr..__
�t�'...
27.
(•
tit1�'I
is
/^
li •._— ....
.. h \e) •24 ^':.fir'
.•:'
1
FOR'^ — •%a-
29
—
"2 E i.A.. "`'t'�"S OEL
.:_
t•a i wa C I roc t' r 'a !i s �'-
° a. - `� 3�..t
u 1
T
^
31 i
An - ..
lac. `L , w'
P 1 i a2� �� 'ri tT
Y�
t
_
15 a', 14
13 12 I Q 1• A
11 to
Z
h:iP
ti Al •l f is
pR'
33 .i
Z SI ell 4
a a
is .a ��
y \
34
�
.: S
T
2 �' ✓�T�rt��
.— �`�1
-.
�.I \>1.�1
-NTT /rte
� � °"
,.... a _��f`
'••. + *3,� i�
_
�
� ..,r
_,...
CONGORO OR /VC :
� �Z
..t �•�.
! II �
1 F
lAl
44
16 i, ..P ru
i'!
1e`i
43 I� �5
1 r�ce�e °�
�
'I' „ 39 �1 it ' 3fi
A �,1
til 42
41 40 ;I 36 I, 37
l—
-
•�
-
V
36�^'' STRt BT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,�IONGA
TRACT 11915.1
� ENGINEERING DIVISION
ERHIBIT "A"
€ N1m VICINITY MAP
page
I
• RESOLUTION NO.-06-20-09C P`1 —' 94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION
WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
5 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on May
16, 1984 adopt Resolution No. 84 -132 giving its preliminary approval to an
Engineer's Report prepared in connection with the formation of an assessment
district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga c d on May
16, 1984 adopt Resolution No. 84 -133 declaring its intention to order the
formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance
District No. 5" and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting 'Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, a certified copy of said Resolution No. 84 -133 was duly
published in the time, form and manner required by law as shown by the
Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution on file in the office of the City
Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
• WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was duly mailed to all persons
owning property within the proposed Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 in
the time, form and manner as required by law; and
n
LJ
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held and this City Council has
duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the
necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom
and this City Council has now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed
work.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby order the formation of
"Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" and the maintenance of certain
landscape improvements to be located within said Landscape Maintenance
District, as more particularly desribed in the Engineer's Report.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby confirms the diagram of
"Landscape 7aintenance District No. 5" as more particularly described in said
Engineer's Report and hereby confirms the assessments for fiscal year 1984 -85
and the method of assessment as more particularly described in the Engineer's
Report.
;� 5, 3
SECTION 4" The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby •
and directed to file the diagram and assessment contained in the Engineer's
Report, or a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
jaa
Jon D. Mi a s, Mayor
�S4
n
L
•
- -- nvawn
STAFF REPORT
FI f
DATE: June 20, 1984 - 1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Ordering the Mork in Connection with the Formation of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 4 for the Terra Vista Planned Community
Attached is a resolution ordering the work in connection with the Terra Vista
Planned Community and approving the attached Engineer's Report.
The district is being formed with Tracts 12316, 12316 -1, 12317, 12317 -1,
12364, 12364 -1 and 12402 which were approved on May 24, 1984 and consist of
397 dwelling units. The estimated assessment for the first phase is $216.20
per year per single family and 5108.10 per year per multifamily dwelling unit.
Additional tracts will be annexed into the District as they record
Estimated assessments for the completed community with a total of 8,000
dwelling units are $131.84 per year per single family dwelling unit and $65.92
per year per multifamily dwelling unit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions required to
approve the City Engineer's Report and order the formation of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 4.
Respectfully sub 'tted,
L8H:8 ,jaaJ
Attachments
�SS,
7F 4RA VISTA
May 22, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: John Martin
Subject: Tract No. 12402
Dear John:
Please accept this letter as our notification of intent to join the exist-
ing landscape and street light maintenance districts of the City of Rancho
• Cucamonga.
Cordially,
WESTERN
PROPERTIES
DOUGLAS R. WALKER
Staff Engineer
ORW:jgc
is 1156N Mountain Ave
PO Box 670
Uplano. CA 91786
(7ta) 9850971
Developed by Lew,s womes f L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 4
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance .+ith the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Divison 15, of the Street and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This report deals with the establishment of a Landscape Mainte ^ance District
for the Terra Vista Planned Community. The District will eventually include
the majority of the area included with the Planned Community, as approved by
Ordinance No. 190. Areas to be included in the work program are to the trees
• and plantings within the rights -of -way of streets dedicated to the City, the
local street trees within dedicated tree maintenance easements as decribed in
the Terra Vista Community Plan, the local public oarks, the greenway system,
community gateways, such similar areas as may be dedicated by the various
subdivisions. Necessary lighting within the park and greenway system is
included in the work program.
The work program excludes street frontage landscaping and trees adjoining non-
residential developments, which will be maintained by those developments;
however, all street trees along the Loop Parkway (Church Street and Terra
Vista Parkway) will be maintained by the Maintenance District, regardless of
the type of property adjoining. The work program includes half the cost of
maintenance of major arterial medians in Haven Avenue, Base Line Road, and
Foothill Bouelvard; the other half is excluded and will be funded by the City
9 or by an assessment on other properties. Maintenance of the proposed City
Zr7
Central Park located north of Base Line Road is also specifically excluded
•
from the work program of this Maintenance District and will be funded by other
means.
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK
The specific areas to be maintained by the District will be those improvements
as defined above lying within rights -of -way, maintenance easements, and other
dedications as shown on subdivison or parcel maps or otherwise dedicated to
the City. These areas will become part of the active work program at such
time as the specific areas are annexed into the District. Annexation will
occur upon recordation of the final map and dedication to the City for each
project. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City,
then landscaping of the areas, then after a minimum of 60 days of maintenance
by the developer, the ac- aptance of maintenance by the Maintenance District no
•
later than the following July. Annual Engineer's reports will be prepared and
approved by the City Council defining the specific work program for each year
and its estimated cost.
The plans and specifications for all landscaping to be installed by developers
will be completed by the developers at their cost for the individual areas to
be maintained within the subdivision and will be approved by the Community
Development Department.
Detailed maintenance activities on the areas to be maintained by the District
consist of providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of the
landscaping including: cultivation, irrigation, trimming spraying,
fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish,
debris and other solid waste; maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary
2 rR
• of all irrigation systems; maintenance, repair, energy costs, and repacement
as necessary of all required lighting within the park and greenway system;
removal of graffiti from walls immediatley adjacent to the cultivated areas;
and repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
The detailed specifications setting forth the specific maintenance activities
to be performed in each area will be prepared annually by the City Engineer as
part of the work program. Lewis Homes of California, as project sponsor of
Terra Vista, has indicated a desire to be involved in the preparation of the
initial specifications in order to assure a high quality of maintenance for
the community. In addition to the general good appearance and health of the
landscaping, the City wishes to assure that trees within the community receive
appropriate training, pruning, and irrigation as detailed in the Landscape
Supplement to the Terra Vista Community Plan. The City will permit the
• project sponsor to participate in the preparation of the detailed
specifications and the sponsor will be given an opportunity to review them
prior to adoption of the work program. The sponsor may also choose to bid on
the maintenance contracts in order to directly assure the best quality of are
for the landscaping in its early years of growth.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
As development proceeds within the Terra Vista Planned Community, the area to
be maintained by the District will increase and so will the cost; however, the
area subject to assessment will also increase. It is anticiapted that the
assessment area will incease at approximately the same rate as the maintenance
area, thereby keeping relatively constant the cost per unit, excluding cost of
living increases.
19 -3-
.-.z s9
The work program for the original District comprising three (3) tracts will •
include trees and plantings within the rights -of -way of streets dedicated to
the City, the local street trees within dedicated tree maintenance easements,
the greenway system, community gateways, and medians only. The work program
will be expanded to include local park maintenance upon annexation of park
area to the District as part of Phase One of Terra Vista.
Based on data from other cities, City of Rancho Cucamonga data for Landscape
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and a review of the Terra Vista Community
Plan, it is estimated that the area to be maintained and the maintanance cost
for assessment purposes will be as follows. The total cost and unit cost vary
as the additional areas for maintenance are annexed to the District. The size
of the areas being annexed to the District for maintenance has a great
influence on the unit cost. The costs shown are estimates only, and the
actual assessment will be based on actual cost data; all of the costs and •
areas are based on current estimates and may or may not be valid for future
years.
A. Phase One Construction
The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the District as initially
formed comprising the 397 dwelling units of Tract No.s 12316, 12316 -1,
12317, 12317 -1 12364, 12364 -1 and 12402 is:
Parks - 5 acres @ 5000 /acre S 25,000
Street parkways - 80,000 s.f. at 50.35 /s.f. S 28,000
Greenway system landscaping - 14,000 s.f. at 50.35 /s.f. 4,900
Medians - 30,000 s.f, at 50.15 /s.f. 4,550
Gateways 4,000
Trees - 600 at S5 /each 3.000
Estimated total annual maintenance cost S 69.400
-4-
AGO
•
B. Complete District
The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the Landscape Maintenance
District upon completion of all areas within the entire Terra Vista
Planned Community is:
Street parkways - 960,500 s.f. at 50.32 /s.f. S 307,400
Greenway system landscaping - 270,000 s.f. at 50.32 /s.f. 86,400
Paved trails and miscellaneous paving -
150,000 s.f, at 50.03 /s.f. 4,500 59,000
Medians - 393,292 s.f. at 50.15 /s.f.
Gateways 10,000
Parks - 38.0 acres at 55,000 /acres 190,E
Trees - 20,000 at SS /each
Estimated total annual maintenance cost $ 757,300
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed Assessment Diagram for the tracts that will comprise
the Maintenance District orginally is attached to this report and labeled
• "Landscaped Maintenace District No. 4 ". This diagram is hereby incorporated
within the text of this report.
The District will originally comprise Tract Nos. 12316, 121316 -1, 12317,12317-
1, 12364, 12364 -1 and 12402 of Phase One of Terra Vista as each tract is
annexed into the District. Additional tracts will be annexed into the
District after its formation. General parameters of the final District are
described on the attached Specific Plan General Assessment Diagram.
;ECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS
Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit
to all developed residental property within the District in accordance with
the following relationship:
Land Use Assessment Units
Single family residential dwelling unit 1 unit
Multifamily /attached residential dwelling unit .5 unit
40 -5-
.2 L/
B. Credits •
Residential projects with homeowner's associations will receive a credit
against assessments if, the association maintains areas that would
otherwise be maintained by the District.
C. Exclusions
Non - residential property and vacant property are exempt from annual
assessment of the landscape Maintenance District except as provided
herein. In the event developed non - residential property fails to maintain
its street frontage landscaping, the Maintenance District may perform the
required maintenance' and levy a special assessment on the adjoining
property owner. Additionally, if street trees or other street frontage
landscaping are installed prior to development of adjoining property, the
vacant land may be similarly assessed for its pro rata share of •
maintenance costs.
Estimated assessments
Estimated Phase One:
Total annual cost (Section 4) E 23,200
Assessment units
Single family 245 Cu. x 1 unit 245 assessment units
Multifamily 152 d.u. x .5 unit = 76 assessment units
Total X97 d.u. II assessment units
Estimated assessment rate = $69,400
`321 216.20
Thus, estimated assessments of $216.20 per single family dwelling unit and
$108.10 per multifamily dwelling unit are projected to be required for the
original District.
-6-
•
• Estimated Planned Community complete:
Total annual cost (Section 4) 5757,300
Assessment units
Single family 3,488 d.u. x 1 unit 3,488 assessment units
Multifamily 4 512 d.u. x .5 unit- 2 256 assessment units
li;W d.u. 3 w assessment units
Estimated assessment rate • S757 300
5:144 - $131.84
Thus, estimated annual assessments of 5131.84 per single family dwelling
unit and $65.92 per multifamily dwelling unit are projected to be required
at project completion.
Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessments will be set
by public hearing each year in June and will be based on actual maintenance
expenses and developed land use summaries. Should direct contributions to the
maintenance costs of the District from the City or other source be received at
• some future date, assessments would be reduced accordingly.
7
.243
LEGEND
PARK
............... PAR""
------ MEDIAN 00
M TRAIL.GPEENWAY
rN GATEWAY rJO
lie M —,. 3 Terta Vesta
M
M
OP
M LM m Nc M41 LM m U
M
MH
M LIN i H
IWW iF, .... LM LM co N XMIAU'
Lpm cc
c
p Lm NC
L 19 Rc
F
LU
YH OR
x 9? —USE
M Lm' m LM
p LM
L
im
op LM fir E
E
I
ll p
OP mm \/.; - t. -
E
M
HO
M
P
H
OR
H
—p— —:7 .....
m c
cc ...... .
c OP MAC
GENERAL ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANOSCAPE MAINTENACE IIISIRICT NILIMOLIR
0
E
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT N0. 12316
--- Tre4 Maintenance Only
This
etc %Rk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA fie\ title;
' �� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO / ` EXHIBIT A
' 000
L �3 STATE CALIFORNIA
bD L D CITY ENGINEER` RCE 23889 OeTE F °8�
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12316 -1
'Ground. and Tree Maintenance
e Tree Maintenance Only
•iiiiii ,,MEDIAN
Base Line
1313'2
H33 3 35 38 37
30
29
c
28 '�
27
25 24 23
Road
a e
1 2
4 7 0
3 6 CC
tY 18 17 16
20 1s
21
22
>t = Cro
10
13 11 `O
o�
„i 12 U
, D
.� `O
Qr
L�
U
i
d
O
01
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment information o
2 64
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A
tit1e;
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
/ `
E%HIBIT
,PTA; 0,EgCALIFORNIA
�:i
on
2
CITY ENGINEER RCE.23889 GATE
Pi$e
2 64
0
•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12317
Ground and Tree Maintenance
Tree Maintenance Only
0
c
rJ
c
m
a
.:
F4Z�
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment inform --lion
0,or " "0�c* CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S title;
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A
STATE F CALIFORNIA
z N
�,tn L 0 CITY ENGINEER RCE.298fi9 OaTE Dage
'
32
2a
24
22
33
13IM29
27
12"12
5
3
21
I
c
m
a
.:
F4Z�
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment inform --lion
0,or " "0�c* CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S title;
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A
STATE F CALIFORNIA
z N
�,tn L 0 CITY ENGINEER RCE.298fi9 OaTE Dage
'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCt'JE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12317 -1
,......Ground and Tree Maintenance
� Tree Maintenance Only
F 24 O
` 23 C
22 UO
21 D
20 °
�o
19
w
a �`o
o�
e
A
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment information only.
° o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `ii''
,! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A
",ter a
STATE 4F CALIFORNIA
N
wn LL 0 hFJBIM, CITY ENGINEER RCE.?3BB9 WE
I
°
\ m
y
\ ¢
2
'
3
(7)
\
4
z
a
s
E'
o
�
w
f
\
\ C
8
�
8
�x
\
,......Ground and Tree Maintenance
� Tree Maintenance Only
F 24 O
` 23 C
22 UO
21 D
20 °
�o
19
w
a �`o
o�
e
A
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment information only.
° o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `ii''
,! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A
",ter a
STATE 4F CALIFORNIA
N
wn LL 0 hFJBIM, CITY ENGINEER RCE.?3BB9 WE
I
I
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12364
Base Line Road
44 45 1 2 3 4 3
6
r t 7
43 42 41 40 39 38 6
9
27 23 37 6> 10
29 36 treet
25 35 11
y 30
25 4) 34 • 12
31
24 32 33 13
23 • tteet 14
21 20 79 18 17 16 15
�- Ground and Tree Maintenance
Tree Maintenance Only
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment information only.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
L TA CALIFORNIA
Ub , n n [ TY FNGINEER RCE 23 A n5
title;
A
N page
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12384 -1
Ground and Tree Maintenance
® Tree Maintenance Only
Base Line Road
i� 0 ��, iix iiiii• MEDIAN
\ 25
24 23
� 27 26
\
is diagram is for maintenance district assessment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BL•RNARDINO
STATE F CALIFORNIA T
ITY "EN GINEER RCE. 33P.p9 PATE l�
cation
title.;
Page
0
0
\ 10
11
12
13 14
v
V
v
•C°
Str
`yI
a
V
a
18 15
C7
V
�_.
7
17
C
v
1a
Q
5
d
rn
19
U
a
m
20
a
3
s
21
2
22
1
\ 25
24 23
� 27 26
\
is diagram is for maintenance district assessment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BL•RNARDINO
STATE F CALIFORNIA T
ITY "EN GINEER RCE. 33P.p9 PATE l�
cation
title.;
Page
0
0
6
•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12402
Ground and Tree Maintenance
j LOT 4
C
m
G LOT 1
LOT 6
m
u
Y
Q
N
LOT 3
1 LOT 2
,,, parKwaY
This diagram is for maintenance district assessr
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE JOF CALIFORNIA Rr
UT R p5 &C#Tlli UIWEEK RC 7380-9 OGTG
Lei
nt i
A
N
c
page
RESOLUTION NO. A6- ee-"CR ?4 - / 8%
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION
WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on May
16, 1984 adopt Resolution No. 84 -148 giving its preliminary approval to an
Engineer's Report prepared in connection with the formation of an assessment
district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on May
16, 1984 adopt Resolution No. 84 -149 declaring its intention to order the
formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance
District No. 4" and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, a certified copy of said Resolution No. 84 -149 was duly
published in the time, form and manner required by law as shown by the
Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution on file in the office of the City
Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
. WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was duly mailed to all persons
owning property within the proposed Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 in
the time, form and manner as required by law; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held and this City Council has
duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the
necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom
and this City Council has now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed
work.
NOW, THEP -ORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby order the formation of
"Landscape MaFntenance District No. 4" and the maintenance of certain
landscape improvements to be located within said Landscape Maintenance
District, as more particularly desribed in the Engineer's Report.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby confirms the diagram of
"Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" as more particularly described in said
Engineer's Report and hereby confirms the assessments for fiscal year 1984 -85
and the method of assessment as more particularly described in the Engineer's
Report.
10
171
SE TC ION 4" The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby •
and direct to file the diagram and assessment contained in the Engineer's
Report, or a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon 0. Mike s, ayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Aut a et, City Clerk
jaa
lJ
•
n
u
•
n
LJ
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
0T ^V n♦XTn nTYl A% X^ Vim.
STAFF REPORT V
June 20, 1984 -
City Council and City Manager
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
1977
Ordering the Work in Connection with the Formation of Street Light
Maintenance District No. 4 for the Terra Vista Planned Community
Attached is a resolution ordering the work in connection with the Terra Vista
Planned Community and approving the attached Engineer's Report.
This district includes street lights located on local, collector and secondary
streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community including Terra Vista
Parkway. The street lights located on the major streets will be annexed into
the City -Wide District No. 1 as further described in Section 2 of the
Engineer's Report,
Tracts 12316, 12316 -1, 12317, 12317 -1, 12364, 12364 -1 and 12402 which received
final City Council approval on May 24, 1984 are the initial tracts forming the
district with future tracts being annexed as they record. Total annual
assessment is estimated at $24.53 for single family dwelling unit and $12.27
Per multifamily dwelling unit for the initial district. Total annual
assessment for the completed district is estimated at $29.85 per single
dwelling unit and $14.93 per multifamily dwelling unit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions required to
approve the City Engineer's Report and order the formation of Street Light
Maintenance District No, 4.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH Jaa —"
Attachments
3'� 1✓
E7ERPA IM73A
ll
May 22, 1984
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: Terra Vista
Landscape and Street Lighting Districts
Dear Lloyd:
Hand Delivered
Please accept this letter as our formal request that landscape and street
• lighting maintenance districts be formed for the Terra Vista Planned Community.
Cordially,
40
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA
� RDCUGL ft. WALKER
Staff Engineer
DRW:;gc
1156N Mountain Ave
PO Bo. 670
Uplano CA 91786
1714) 985.0971
OM[00e0 by Lewin Homes A 7 i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
•
ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 4
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Divison 15, of the Street and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscape and Lighting Act of 1912).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This report deals with the establishment of a Street Lighting Maintenance
District for the Terra Vista Planned Community. The District will eventually
include the majority of the area included with the Planned Community, as
approved by Ordinance No. 190. Areas to be included in the work program are
the street lights within the rights -of -way or designated easements of streets
•
dedicated to the City and are limited to local, collector and se- .,ndary
arterial streets, including Terra Vista Parkway. The work program excludes
maintenance of street lights in rights -of -way of major arterial highways (Base
Line Road, Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, Rochester Avenue and Milliken
Avenue) and Church Street. These areas will be included in the city -wide
lighting district for arterial highways,
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK
The specific areas to be maintained by the District as defined in the
preceding section, will become part of the active work program at such time as
the specific areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be
the dedication of the areas to the City, construction of the st eet lightir
system, and, upon demonstration of satisfactory operation, the acceptance b,
the District no later than the following July. The Developer will make a
.
sufficient deposit with the Southern California Edison Company to provide for
1 '
up to twelve (12) months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and
servicing costs of the street lights in each development at the time of
initial operation of the lighting system. Upon establishment of assessment
effective July 1 of each year, any remaining deposit shall be refunded to the
developer. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the
District, consists of maintenance, operation and servicing of street lights.
Annual Engineer's reports will be prepared and approved by the City Council
defining the specific work program for each year and its estimated cost.
The plans and specifications for all street lighting will be prepared by the
developers for the subdivision improvements and will be approved by the City
Engineering Division.
Detailed maintenance activities on the Street Lighting Maintenance District
include: the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
• maintenance, operation and servicing of any street light improvement and the
repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement,
providing for the illumination of the subject area.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
As development proceeds within the Terra Vista Planned Community, the area to
be maintained by the District will increase and so will the cost; however, the
number of dwelling units will also increase. It is anticiapted that the
number of dwelling units will increase at approximately the same rate as the
maintenance area will increase, thereby keeping relatively constant the cost
per dwelling unit, excluding cost of living increases. Based on historical
data adjusted for inflation, it is estimated that the quantity of street
lights and the maintenance and energy costs for assessment purposes will be as
follows:
-2
A. Phase One Construction •
The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the District as initially
formed comprising the 397 dwelling units of Tract Nos. 12316, 12316 -1,
12317, 12317 -1, 12364, 12364 -1 and 12402 is:
Lamp Quantity* Rate** Month /Year
75 ea. 5800 Lumen x $8.75 x 12 = $7,875 /year total
annual maintenance cost
B. Complete District
The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the District upon completion of
all areas within the entire Terra Vista Planned Community is:
Lamp Quantity* Rate ** Month /Year
1,500 ea. 5800 Lumen x $8.75 x 12 = $157,500
118 ea. 9500 Lumen x $9.85 x 12 = 13 950
$171'450 year total
annual maintenance cost
' Assumed to be high pressure sodium vapor, 5800 lumen or 9500 •
lumen;actual type and size may vary.
*' All night energy service per lamp per month including raintenance
costs.
All the costs are based an Southern California Edison Company monthly rates
including maintenance. All costs and areas are based on current estimates and
may or may not be Valid for future years. The total cost and unit cost vary
as the monthly rate varies and as additional areas for maintenance are annexed
to the District. The monthly rate is established by the Southern California
Edison Company and is not currently controlled by the size of an area or any
operation of the developer. The size of the areas being annexed to the
District only has an influence on the total cast. The costs shown are
estimates only, and the actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. •
-3-
• SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed Assessment Diagram for the tracts that will comprise
the Maintenance District orginally is attached to this report and labeled
"Street Lighting Maintenace District No. 4 ". This diagram is hereby
incorporated within the text of this report.
The District will originally comprise Tract Nos, 12316, 121316 -1, 12317,
12317 -1, 12364, 12364 -1 and 12402 of Phase One of Terra Vista as each tract is
recorded and annexed into the District at the time of recordation. Additional
tracts will be annexed into the District upon individual tract recordation.
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS
Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit
to all developed residental property within the District in accordance with
the following relationship:
•
•
Land Use Assessment Units
Single family residential dwelling unit 1 unit
Multifamily /attached residential dwelling unit .5 unit
Estimated Annual Assessments
Estimated Phase One:
Total annual cost
(Section
4)
$ 7,875
Assessment units
Single family
245 d.u.
x 1 unit =
245 assessment units
Multifamily
152 d.u.
x .5 unit =
76 assessment units
Total
347 d.u.
31i assessment units
Estimated assessment rate
= $7,875
32
= 524.53 per year
-4-
<oy
Thus, estimated assessments of 524.53 per single family dwelling unit and •
$12.27 per multifamily dwelling unit will initially be required for the
original District.
Estimated Planned Community complete:
Total annual cost (Section 4) $171,450
Assessment units
Single family 3,488 d.u. x 1 unit = 3,488 assessment units
Multifamily 4 512 d.u, x .5 unit= 2 255 assessment units
'eW d.u. 3744 assessment units
Estimated assessment rate - S1712450
744 = $29.85 per year
Thus, estimated annual assessments of 529.85 per single family dwelling
unit and $14.93 per multifamily dwelling unit are projected to be required
at project completion.
Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessments will be set
by public hearing each year in June and will be based on actual energy and •
maintenance expenses and developed land use summaries,
-5-
l J
.a ?0
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4
TRACT N0. 12316 -1
Base Line m Road
» `o
12 (pQ
D
0
�o
�o
V
d`
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment information
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
�s COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Ext
STATE ALIFORNIA
\�
D , —
II ) 1 `
_ un LLO CITY ENGINEER RCE.2 889_ DATE Va3�
d 51
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4
TRACT NO. 12316
321"/4
31130 '29'28
� 21 � 20
t0 24 25
18 %Fs Sf�ee
t7 Ris i
18 10 a
1
0
11 \
/J
i nis aiagrani is for maintenance district assessment information
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAASONGA title
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
z STATE , F CALIFORNIA N —
Vd i> —
un
U-9TO TY ENGINEER RCE.23ee9 GATE page
as �
0
•
46
•
I-1
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4
41 1
c 2
> 3 (A
Q
C 4 0]
d 6 �
TRACT NO. 12317 -1
r cz
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment information onl
"'" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
O:± p
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO � e
�; I= IFO S O ALRNIA T
N
6 t--j; LIMYVH0M. CITY ENGINEER RCE.23889 G ATE �4ge
� 9 3
m
d
a
c
no
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4
TRACT N0. 12317
to
tz
13
o
0
0
0
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment information only. 1
os` - �c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA
t= COUNTY OF SAN BERNARbIA'O
I IXATAT F ALIFORNIA
title;
A
N page
r�
u
n
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TRACT NO. 12364 -1
Base Line Road
10 Iii 112113J14
9
s
•C• Street
26 25
24 23
27
(This diagram is for maintenance district assessment in
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ATE, C I ORNIA
inn � ENG EER RCE.2 899 OATE
c
page
7
d
d
>
m
`
S
d
�
w
�
4
m
W
3
2
1
•C• Street
26 25
24 23
27
(This diagram is for maintenance district assessment in
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ATE, C I ORNIA
inn � ENG EER RCE.2 899 OATE
c
page
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4
TRACT NO. 12364
Base Line Road
444.J43 /2 3 4 6 Street 7
43142 41 40 39 39 e
9
27 29 37 10
29 36 i •G"
28 35
30 N 11
26 31 34 12
24 N 33 13
• 32
23 :L 0' street 14
1" 21
20 19 19 17 16 15
fleet
•
This diagram is fog maintenance district assessment information only
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ti
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
IFORNTA
VL L 1>
page
L 0 CITY ENGIN R RCE.2.BB9 onrc _ _ J
a J,G
e
•
J
Is
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4
TRACT NO. 12402
m I
C
CD
a
LOT 7
m
ua
a
W
LOT 4
LOT 5
LOT 3
1 LOT 2
P aT " 2)
This diagram is for maintenance district assessment inl
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
i s COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN0
ST ,& 0 IF CALIFORNIA j
A n ATV rani. cCD Dnc 9+ogo Mre
^ 07
atio
citlr.;
past.
EXHIBIT "B"
Tract No. 12316 as recorded in Book _
Tract No. 12316 -1 as recorded in Book
Tract No. 12317 as recorded in Book
Tract No. 12317 -1 as recorded in Book
Tract No. 12364 as recorded in Book
Tract No. 12364 -1 as recorded in Book
Tract No. 12402 as recorded in Book
Official records of San Bernardino Coy
Page
_, Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
mty, State of California.
I8?
•
•
•
V]
RESOLUTION N0. 46-20-14" 8 `1-/ 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION
WITH THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) AND
ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on May
24, 1984 adopt Resolution No. 84 -151 giving its preliminary approval to an
Engineer's Report prepared in connection with the formation of an assessment
district to be known as "Street Light Maintenance District No. 4" pursuant to
the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on May
16, 1984 adopt Resolution No. 84 -152 declaring its intention to order the
formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Light Maintenance
District No. 4" and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, a certified copy of said Resolution No. 84 -152 was duly
published in the time, form and manner required by law as shown by the
Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution on file in the office of the City
Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was duly mailed to all persons
owning property within the proposed Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 in
the time, form and manner as required by law; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held and this City Council has
duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the
necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom
and this City Council has now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed
work.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby order the formation of "Street
Light Maintenance District No. 4" and the maintenance of certain landscape
improvements to be located within said Street Light Maintenance District, as
more particularly desribed in the Engineer's Report.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby confirms the diagram of "Street
Light Maintenance District No. 4" as more particularly described in said
Engineer's Report and hereby confirms the assessments for fiscal year 1984 -85
and the method of assessment as more particularly described in the Engineer's
Report.
X09
SECTION 4" The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby •
and direct to file the diagram and assessment contained in the Engineer's
Report, or a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authe et, City Clerk
jaa
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
.2 9D
E
ORDINANCE NO. 225
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A PARK DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON
MATTERS PERTAINING TO PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
has an adopted General Plan containing a Parks Element; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the implementation of the
Parks Element of said General Plan can be enhanced through the establishment of
a Park Development Commission.
BE IT NOW, THEREFORE RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
SECTION 1: Park Development Commission. There is hereby created
the Rancho ucamonga Par eve opmen ommts-
SECTION 2: Membership. The Park Development Commission shall
consist o ve voting ers, subject to the following conditions:
• (a) Commission members shall be residents of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga;
9
(b) Commission members shall be appointed by the City Council;
(c) Commission members shall serve for terms of four (4) years,
except that two of the members first appointed shall be
designated to serve for a term of two (2) years, and three a term
of four (4) years, so as to provide a continuity of membership on
the Commission. Thereafter, the term for each voting member
shall be four (4) years. An appointment to fill an unexpired
term shall be for the remainder of such unexpired term;
(d) A Commission member may be removed upon the majority vote of the
entire City Council.
SECTION 3: Chairperson. The Mayor, with the approval of the City
Council, ssia7 appoint t eFi�irst7lTatrperson from among the Commission members,
subject to the following conditions:
Z9/
Ordinance No. 225
Page 2
•
(a) The term of office of the Chairperson shall be for the calendar
year, or that portion remaining after said Chairperson is
appointed or elected. Thereafter, when there is a vacancy in the
office of Chairperson, the Commission shall elect a Chairperson
from among its members.
SECTION 4: Administration. The Community Services Director shall
act as Secretary o the a eve opment Commission and shall be the custodian
of its records, conduct official correspondence, and shall generally coordinate
the clerical and technical work of the Park Development Commission in
administering this Ordinance. The Community Services Director may designate an
alternative to serve as Secretary during the absence of the Director.
SECTION 5: Duties of the Park Development Commission. Thy Park
Development omm ssion s a, rev ew ma ers re a ve o par and recreation
facility development on behalf of the City Council and provide comments or
recommendations to the City Council as may be appropriate.
SECTION 6: Meetin s. Regular meetings of the Park Development
Commission s a e held-at—s-u-cY time and place as is determined by Resolution
of the City Council.
SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk •
shall cause a same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in The Oaily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario. CaTor a
Cucamonga, California. and circulated in the City of Rancho
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES;
ABSENT;
ATTEST:
every u e e , y er
.i )-
on u. VTFeTs—,-Wa—yor
C,
J
0
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -124
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING SCHEDULE FOR REGULAR
MEETINGS OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The time and place of the regular meetings of the Park
Developmen omm ssion shall he held on the third Thursday of each month at
7:30 p.m. at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
SECTION 2: Special meetings may he held in accordance with City
policy.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSENT:
ATTEST:
every Authelet, Cifly-MeW-
9
Jon U. Mikels, Mayor
.1 93
O COUNTY SHERfFF,s Floyd Tidwell
Sheriff
• P,�O CFA
2 ^Ded,,mrd To Your Sa /rrv"
May 4, 1984
Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Dear Mr. Wasserman:
Enclosed is the proposed fiscal year 1984 -85 addendum to the
Law Enforcement service contract between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino.
• please have the original and five (5) copies of the attached
contract signed by the City representative and return all copies
to the Sheriff's Bureau of Administration.
After approval by the Board of Supervisors, an executed copy
will be forwarded to you.
Sincerely,
FT:TGW:mlh
Enclosures -6
1
FLOYD TIDWELL, SHERIFF
By Thomas G. Wickum, Captain
Bureau of Administration
Post Office Box 569, San Bet nardino, CA 92403
ally
**COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD CONTRACT
83 -819 Al
❑ Ranewable ❑ Tvmmam
2511
gl"ck DM ExgrMitYl! ryRrVMYa 11 fom"' Ilat mOr![p!Y OM pe, -im, OI rlpipt,
.S.S,A, _ [ompbte IM followm9
or F"Wral Number of payminn 12
Emclpvw lD= Enimatad emouni .1 had, Per Schedu Ll
THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereafter
called the County, and
City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereafter called Ci
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
iUw space below and reverse side of form if needed. Set forth service to be rendered, ampunt to be paid, manner of payment,
time for performance or completion, determination of satisfactory performance and carom for termination, odler terms antl
conditions, and attach plant rpecificavons) and addenda, if any.)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
• Contract Number 93 -819, providing for Law Enforcement
service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended
effective July 1, 1984, by replacing Schedule "A" referred to in
Paragraph Iv with a new Schedule "A" as attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Except for this amendment, all other provisions
of said contract remain as stated therein.
Any provisions on the reverse side and referenced attachments hereof constitute a part of this contract and are
Incorporated herein in full.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Dated
ATTESTED:
IF
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
l
CouK ast el jOri -, Counsel Cou y
pe 1ee95 10, tshaft Farm)
(Stare J corporation, company.
By "
IAurhonted Signature)
Dated
Title
Address
Reviewed as to budget expenditure
If
County Administrative Office peas r at 1
zqr
Schedule "A" Rates •
Law Enforcement Service Contract
City of Rancho Cucamonga FY 1984 -85
Service Proposed FY 1984 -85
Cost*
5 - 168 Hour General Law Patrol Units
1 - 112 Hour General Law Patrol Unit
2 - 80 Hour General Law Patrol Unit
1 - 56 Hour General Law Patrol Unit
1 - 40 Hour General Law Patrol Unit
2 - 80 Hour Traffic Patrol Units
2 - 40 Hour Traffic Patrol Units
5 - 40 Hour Detective Units
Captain and Car
SergeantIs Marked Unit
Additional Detective Unmarked Unit
Four -Wheel Drive Unit
Deputy I
Safety Unit Extra Help (K months)
Senior Deputy Differential (3)
Radio Dispatcher (5)
Secretary II
Replacement Radar, one Unit model KR11
Travel Expense
County Direct Costs
Secretary I Differential
County Direct Cost :ncludes:
Personnel liability insurance fee
Personnel bonding fee
ADDITIONAL CHARGES BILLED QUARTERLY:"
$1,363,665 **
196,419 **
265,154 **
92,922x*
67,508 **
265,154 **
136,016 **
357,910 **
67,927 **
5,336 **
5,282 **
6,429 **
35,956
10,394
11,289
112,652
24,621
2,500
4,000
45,629
999
$3,079,762*
•
Monthly Payment Schedule
1st Payent Due July 15th 5256,645
2nd through 12th Payment $256,647
Due 5th of Each Month
Overtime: Overtime and court appearances estimate for FY 84 -85 is
5102,040. Actual overtime will be billed quarterly.
Maintenance: Estimated maintenance cost based on 823,500 miles @ 79
per mile is S57,645. Actual cost will be billed quarterly,
*Proposed, subject to change due to Memorandum of Understanding
changes.
* *Less Fuel and Maintenance
(RCSCDA)
05- 04 -84D
E
Ll
•
n
LJ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: - June 6. 1984 y:
T0: Members of the.City Council and City Manager
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: BASE LINE MEDIAN DESIGN - Landscape and construction design
concept or the ase Line median, east of Maven Avenue
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission held a meeting on May 28, 1984 to
consider the above - described item and recommended approval of the
landscape and construction design concept subject to providing soil
moisture tensiometers and simulated alluvial granite edging. Please
find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report which fully
describes this item.
Pending City Council approval, staff would add the Goldenrain tree to
the City's designated street tree list to promote a consistent
landscaping theme along Base Line, including Terra Vista, Victoria and
Etiwanda communities.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City
.ounce -i aoorove the landscape and construction design concept through
minute action.
Resoectfu;ir submitted:
/X/
1�7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 23, 1984
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: BASE LINE MEDIAN DESIGN
19^
I. BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Conditions of Approval, Lewis
Homes has prepared landscaping construction plans for the Base Line
median island, 'Exhibit "A ". Because of the importance of this
median as a community design element, Staff is seeking Planning
Commission review and consideration of the proposed design.
ft. ANALYSIS: The primary purpose of the median island is to control
trarfTc along Base Line by prohibiting indiscriminate and haphazard
turn movements. The General Plan encourages use of the median
island as an urban design resource by designing it aesthetically
through creative use of hardscace and landscape treatment. The
landscaping adds aesthetic character that softens the impact of new
development. The Community Design section of the General Plan
specifically discusses the function and character of the median
island.
"When possible, median landscaping should be Provided
along major divided arterials. Such landscaping should
be scaled according to the size of the roadway and the
importance of the route. .Major views from the roadway
should be enhanced and emphasized by the landscaping.
P'2 ^t materials should not obscure views." ('age 146)
The parkway tree planting guidelines in the General Plan or000se
large columnar evergreens to reflect the rural history and 'mage of
the Eucalyptus windrows. The landscaping SUDDlememt for Terra
Vista designates Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Red gum) as the
appropriate oarkway tree. However, the general Plan made no
soecif'c •ecommendation as to the type or tree variety to be used
In the red an. The Terra vista landscape suPDlement gas
established the following criteria:
:9P ITEM 1
•
•
• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Base Line Median Design
Page 2
Median should be planted with distinctive trees that will
lend identity to the streets. To promote views of the
mountains and other features, median trees should
generally be deciduous. Ornamental flowering varieties
are preferred, no larger than medium sized, so as to not
overwhelm the street."
Specifically, the Terra vista landscape supplement proposes the
Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain tree) as the Base Line median
tree to highlight views of the City's central park and the
mountains without blocking them. The Goldenrain tree is a fairly
small (20 to 35 feet), deciduous tree which is covered with spikes
of brignt yellow flowers in summer. The flowers are followed by
buff colored seed pods, which ornament the tree well into the
winter after the leaves fall. The Goldenrain's long deciduous
period and open branching (particularly when intergrowth is pruned)
make it a good choice for this excellent view location.
The proposed construction drawings indicated 15 gallon Goldenrain
trees planted 20 feet on center, and underplanted with Oleander and
Natal plum shrubs. In addition, the median design is proposed to
• include the stamped concrete pattern resembling alluvial granite
stone which is also used along the Haven Avenue median. A
conventional shrub spray head irrigation system is proposed. Staff
recommends that soil moisture tensiometers be included, as required
along Haven Avenue median, which measures moisture of soil to
control adequate watering.
Staff conducted a detailed analysis of 15 street trees suitable for
this area and climate. Each tree was reviewed in terms of: (I)
low :maintenance, (2) moderate to fast growth rate, and '31 a
tolerance for drought, heat, smog, and wind. Attached as Exhibit
's a list of trees meeting this criteria that would be
aovrooriate for median planting. The Goldenrain tree xas not
Included tecause of its slow to moderate growtn rate. 40wever, the
Goldenrain tree is particularly suited to tnis area in terms of
Cold, heat, drought, wind, and soil tolerance. Therefore, Staff
has no objection to the Goldenrain tree being .ised as a median tree
on Base Line Avenue.
RE.CmmE90A7,.N, It 4s recommended that the .ommiseidn approve the
proposed mea:an concept subject tJ orovtding soil moisture
tensiometers.
r
Respectfully submitted: y
Rick,Gomez
C i ty( V1 anner
�,a a
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT •
Base Line Median Design
Page 3
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Landscaping Construction Plan
Exhibit "C" - Tree List
Exhibit "D" - Photograph of the Goldenrain tree
•
•
300
L
•
— e
PRo�bSED MVEOIM1
NNE
i
tp�
Y
OP
rmnu.w
SPECIAL LANDSCAPING TREATMENT DESCRIBED IN FOOTHILL GUIDELINES
FIGURE IV-1
Landscape Plan
NON* COLUMNAR TREES
AT PERIMETER
=LOOP OPEN EFFECT
ORNAMENTAL MEDIAN TREE
® LOOP —ARBOR EFFECT
0000 COLUMNAR TREES FRAMING
MOUNTAIN VIEWS
INFORMAL PLANTING IN
CLUSTERS
STREET TREES VARYING
WITH NEIGHBORHOOD
/= GREENWAY AND TRAIL
\ MAJOR GATEWAY
SECONDARY GATEWAY
SPECIAL GATEWAY
0 5 10w 1500 O /� \ORTvH
S"w m 4N
CITY OF ITE \I �� t 2��A+j
RANCHO CUCVNIONGA TITLE6PQ M
P"NNI \G Dl\'b9 N EXHIBITt A SCALE
gc/
L 1
0
A TR:
Nr f�LY
—F06l Mbmuolwr per^
SEE x r inGMvRnn
P.JY1 S.
J v
\ORTH
CITY Or ITEM.. , � -+ Q 6 M� A.4 j
RANCHO CUOLMONGA TITLE LSD SCw &eff
PLANNING DIVEM L\Hinm ft SCALE
30 i
•
EXHIBIT
TREES SUITABLE FOR MEDIANS
Ceciduous
or
Common
Evergreen
Name
C
E
Italian Alder
E
Silver Dollar Gum
Semi
,Desert Gum
Jacaranda
D
E
Crape Myrtle
E
Flaxleaf Paperoark
Pink Melaleuca
E
Cajeput Tree
E
E
Chinese Plotinia
'C
Canary Island Pine
•
London Plane Tree
"
Chinese Scholar Tree
3�3
1
F
Botanical
Name
Alnus Cordata
Eucalyptus Polyanthoros
E. Rudis
Jacaranda Acutifolia
Lagerstroemia Indica
Melaleuca Linari ifolia
M. Nesoonila
M. Ouinouenervia
Photinia Serru',ata
Pinus Canariensis
Platanus Acerfolia
Sopnora Japonica
OWOT a r
+fit.
0
•
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engi..ieer
1977
SUBJECT: Designation of Foothill Freeway Interchange at Day Creek Blvd. and
East Avenue
The General Plan Circulation Element designates certain modifications to the
interchanges with the Route 30 Freeway. The most significant modifications
being the elimination of the interchange at Etiwanda Avenue and the addition
of interchanges at East Avenue and Day Creek Blvd.
A recent development proposals on the north side of Highland Avenue between
East and Etiwanda Avenues precipitated a preliminary feasibility study on the
construction of an interchange at East Avenue. CalTrans completed that study
and has verified that a conventional diamond interchange is workable.
In order to allow their plans to officially reflect these changes, they have
requested a formal resolution of the Council to make the modifications.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend adoption of the resolution requesting revision and reaffirmation of
interchange locations and freeway design features.
Respectfully suynitted.
LBH:
Attachments
30 r
1
awl
ow
m
0
�i
' 3 06
E'xHlr3l - A
EAST AvENVF-
IIV7- RagANJ&F,
y:.:.
SPl'.CII IC l'L.\>
,► 11.'�� mr
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -172
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCOH
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DESIGNATION OF FREEWAY
INTERCHANGE ON ROUTE 30 AT DAY CREEK BLVD. AND EAST
AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California upon incorporation
assumed jurisdiction of a portion of the designated future Route 30 Freeway
from approximately Cucamonga Creek to Interstate 15; and
WHEREAS, said portion of Route 30 was covered by Freeway Agreement by
and between CalTrans and San Bernardino County designating proposed freeway
interchange locations throughout the freeway segment; and
WHEREAS, CalTrans is proceeding to protect rights -of -way in
conformance with those past,freeway agreements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California through adoption of
its General Plan Circulation Element has revised the location of said
interchanges.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Rancho Cucamonga
requests CalTrans to prepare the necessary documents to revise the Route 30
• interchange locations to provide for the following modification:
1. Delete interchange location at Etiwanda Avenue.
•
2. Provide for interchange with East Avenue.
3. Add interchange at future alignment of Day Creek
Boulevard approximately 4,000 feet west of Etiwanda
Avenue.
4. All other interchange locations shall remain at the
following: Carnelian Street, Archibald Avenue, Haven
Avenue, Future Milliken Avenue.
3o7
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City requests the revision of •
existing plans and right -of -way protection to reflect a maximum depression of
Route 30 between Cucamonga and Deer Creek Channels and between Etiwanda and
East Avenues.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City CTe7r
jaa
Jon 0. Mi a s, Mayor
303
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUMS
Date: June 13, 1984
To: City Council and City Manager :>
1977
From: Dick Maye P anner
Couunity ervices Department
Subject: Approv•1 of Revised Cost Sharing Agreement with 0.5. Amy Corps
of Engt ,sere for the Cucamonga Creek Recreation Project. Agenda
Item
Background
On September 7, 1983, the City Council approved the Cost Sharing Agreement
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for the Cucamonga Creek Recreation
Project. The agreement provided for the City's participation in the project
on a 50% cost sharing basis in the amount of $285,000, with a total project
cost estimated to be $570,000, including engineering and inspection costs.
The major improvements to be developed under that agreement included Creekside
Park, an underpass at Cucamonga Creek and Base Line Road, an underpass at
• Cucamonga Creek and 19th Street, a rest stop at the confluence area between
the Cucamonga Creek and Demens Creek channels and 4 bridge crossings at
various points in the project.
Staff Comment
Since the approval of the agreement, we have been working with the Corps of
Engineers to design and develop the project in such a manner as to best
benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga. After reviewing the Corps of Engineers'
Feature Design Memorandum (FOR), which provides details and a program
narrative of the project, and their design consultant's preliminary
construction plans, it became apparent that additional improvements would be
necessary if the City's initial reasons for involvement in the project were to
be realized. These were the development of a hiking, biking and equestrian
trail system from Heritage Park to Base Line Road and the development of
support facilities, such as the park, rest area underpasses and bridges, for
that trail system. The Corps of Engineers' work had provided for little, if
any, work to be accomplished towards the development of the actual trail
system. Additionally, as the project was defined, the costs of certain items,
such as the park and rest area, increased in estimated cost.
Scontinued ...
Soy
page 2
6/13/84
re: Cut Sharing Agreement, O.S. Any Corps of Engineers
W
We requested the Corps of Engineers to include the trail system work in their
design effort and re- estimate the project cute. The trail system work will
now be included in the project and the Corps' revised estimate for the total
project, including engineering and inspection cut is $750,000. On a 50% cut
sharing basis, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's share will be $375,000, and the
Corps of Engineers' share will also be $375,000.
Because of the estimated increase in project cost, which is $180,000, more
than originally estimated ($90,000, increase for the City and $90,000, for the
Corps), a revised cost sharing agreement must be approved by both parties
prior to construction of the project. We have reviewed the revised cost
estimate and find it to be reasonable. The revisions to the original - at
sharing agreement reflect the revised cost amount and minor changes created by
Federal reviews of the agreement and are not substantial in nature.
Sufficient funds are available in the Park Development Fund to accommodate
this increase.
Staff Recommendation
That the City Council: •
1. Approve the attached revised cost sharing agreement entitled, "Contract
Between The United States of America and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for Recreation Development at the Cucamonga Creek and Demens Creek
Channels, San Bernardino County, California: and
2. Approve the increase in City participation, of an additional $90,000,
from the Park Development Fund, in the project.
;? /G
CONTRACT BETWEEN
•. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
for
RECREATION DEVELOPMENT
at the
CUCAMONGA CREEK AND DEMENS CREEK CHANNELS,
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
THIS CONTRACT entered into this day of _, 19_ by and between the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereinafter called the -Government"), represented by
the Contracting Officer executing this Contract and City o£ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CITY COUNCIL (hereinafter called the "City-). _-
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, construction of the Cucamonga Creek and Demons Creek channels,
San Bernardino County, ,California (hereinafter called the "Project-) was
authorized by Act of Congress, Flood Control Act of 1968, Public Law 90 -483,
90th Congress, 2nd session, approved on 13 August 1968; and
WHEREAS, recreational development at the project was authorized by Public
Law 543, 78th Congress, as amended and was included as a post authorization
change of 12 May 1976; and
• WHEREAS, the City is authorized to administer project land and water areas
for recreational purposes, and operate, maintain and replace facilities
Provided for such purposes and is empowered to contract for such purposes, and
is empowered to contract in these respects; and
11
WHEREAS, the City has the authority and capability to arrange for the non.
Federal cooperation required by the Federal legislation authorizing the
recreation features of the project and by their applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the Government is authorized by Section 4 of the 1944 Flood
Control Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 460d) to make contracts with non - Federal
bodies for development, management and administration of the recreation
resources of Federal water resources projects; and
WHEREAS, the City is required by separate agreement with the Government to
acquire use rights of all lands, easements, and rights -of -way necessary for
the construction of the flood control features of the Project upon which the
subject recreational features will also be constructed; and
WHEREAS, the recreational development at Federal nonreservoir water
resources projects shall be in accordance with the cost - sharing principles in
the Federal Water Resources Project Recreation Act of 1965 (Public Law 89 -72).
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
3//
ARTICLE 1 - DEFINITION OF TERMS. For the purpose of this contract certain •
terms are defined as follows:
a) First costa, wed interchangeably with the terms "capital cost" and
"project costs," is the initial capital recreation cost of the
project, including engineering, design, supervision and
administration, land acquisition and construction.
b) Recreation lands: Project lands acquired primarily for recreational
purposes, excluding lands needed for flood control or other Project
Purposes.
e) Recreational ' acilities: Those facilities for recreation which may be
Installed pu :ant to this agreement.
ARTICLE 2 - LANDS AND FACILITIES.
a) The City will secure we of lands outside the boundary of the f'c-
control features necessary for recreation, access, health and saf
b) The Government agrees to design and construct the recreation features
of the Project to provide for optimum enhancement of general
recreation consistent with other authorized Project purposes. Details
on lands and facilities necessary for such enhancement will be shown
in the Feature Design Memorandum.
c) The Government in cooperation with the City will prepare a mutually .
acceptable Feature Design Memorandum which will depict and identify
the types and quantities of facilities which the Government and the
City will construct in accordance with this contract. The full cost
of facilities to be so provided, is estimated at $750.000.00. The
presently estimated cost of facilities to be provided is contained in
Exhibit A entitled "Estimated Separable Recreation Costs," attached
hereto and made a part hereof. Such estimate of facility cost is
subject to reasonable adjustment as appropriate upon completion of
construction and approval of the above - mentioned Feature Design
Memorandum.
d) The facilities shown in Exhibit A, as it may be adjusted in accordance
with paragraph c) above, shall be constructed jointly by the parties
through mutually satisfactory division of responsibility for
construction, which takes into account direct and indirect cost
savings that may be gained by the parties in the public interest for
certain specific facilities, provided, that the facilities to be
constructed by each party shall be formally agreed upon by the two
parties prior to construction, consistent with the provisions of
Article 3•
e) Title to all lands acquired by or with Government assistance for other
authorized :roject purposes, and title to all recreation facilities
constructed on such lands, shall at all times be in public ownership.
•
I J1
f) The performance of any obligation or the expenditure of any funds by
the Government under this contract is contingent upon Congress making
the necessary appropriations and funds being allocated and made
available for the work required hereunder.
ARTICLE 3 - CONSIDERATION AND PAYMENT. Each party hereto will pay or
contribute in kind fifty percent (50f) of the separable first costs of
recreation development and fifty percent (50x) of the separable cost of future
development. '
a) Initial Development. Fifty percent (50 %) of the estimated separable
first costs of initial recreation development is estimated to be
$375,000.00. Before advertisement of the first construction contract
hereunder and again before advertisement of each subsequent
construction contract thereafter, the Government Contracting Officer
shall calculate the estimated expenditure which the Government and the
city shall have made through the end of such contract. If the total
estimated expenditures by the Government shall exceed those of the
City, the City shall pay to the Government such am as will equalize
the expenditures of both parties before award of such contract. In
computing expenditures, there shall be considered, in addition to cash
expenditures, contributions in kind such as land and facilities, at
the fair market value thereof at the time such land and facilities are
provided by the City, which value shall not include enhancement due to
the Project. Upon completion of initial recreation development, an
adjustment will be made on the basis of actual costs incurred. It is
understood and agreed that the City's share of the cost of each
40 construction contract shall be computed on the basis of actual costs
to the Government of the work included in the Government construction
contracts above and on the basis of unit prices in each Government
contract and final quantities covering labor, materials, and equipment
required for the work under each Government's constructional,
engineering and overhead expense and not on the basis of previous
estimates.
b) Future Development. Neither the Government nor the City is obligated
by this contract to undertake any future recreation development of the
project, except to the extent this contract may be so modified by
future supplemental agreement signed by all parties and approved by
the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative. If at any
time the City wishes to undertake further development of the
facilities hereunder, it may do so at its expense provided prior
approval of the Contracting Officer is obtained, but the Government
shall not be obligated to reimburse the City for any portion of such
expense in the absence of a supplemental agreement hereto as
aforesaid.
e) Other Federal Funds. No repayment credit of any kind whatsoever will
be allowed the City for expenditures financed by, involving, or
consisting of, either in whole or in part, contributions or grants of
assistance received from any Federal agency, except HUD block grants,
in providing any lands or facilities for recreation enhancement
Is hereunder.
3/3
d) Adjustment to Reflect Costs. The dollar amounts set forth in this .
Article are based on the Government's beat estimates, and are subject
to adjustments based on the costa actually incurred. Such estimates
are not to be construed as representations of the total financial
responsibilities of each of the parties.
ARTICLE 4 - CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES.
Certain types of facilities including, but not necessarily limited to,
restaurants, lodges, golf courses, cabins, clubhouses, overnight or vacation.
type structures, stables, marinas, swimming peola, commissaries, chairlifts,
and such similar revenue - producing facilities may be constructed by the City
or third parties and may be operated by the City or third parties as
concessions. Any such construction and operation of these types of facilities
shall be compatible with all project purposes and shall be - dLbject to the
prior approval of the Contracting Officer. However, the City shall not
receive credit for costs of such facilities against amounts due and payable
under Article 3.
ARTICLE 5 - FEES AND CHARGES. The City may assess and collect fees for
entrance to developed recreation areas and for use of the recreation project
facilities and areas, in accordance with a fee schedule mutually agreed to by
the Government and the City. Not leas often than every five (5) years, said
parties will review such schedule and upon the request of either, re- nagotiate
the schedule. The re- negotiated fee schedule shall, upon written agreement
thereto by the parties, supersede prior schedules without the necessity of
Modifying this contractual document.
ARTICLE 6 - FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS,
a) In acting under its rights and obligations hereunder, the City agrees
to comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations,
including but not limited to the provisions of the Davis -Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 216 a- a(7)); the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
(40 U.S.C. 327 -333); and part 3 of Title 29, Code of Federal
Regulations.
b) The City furnishes, as part of this contract, an assurance (Exhibit B)
that it will Comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78
Stat. 241, 42 U.S.C. 2000 d, et sec) and Department of Defense
Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of
Title 32, Code or Federal Regulations. The City agrees also that it
will obtain such assurances from all its concessionaires.
c) The City furnishes, as part of this contract, its assurance that it
Will comply with Sections 210 and 305 of the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public
Law 91 -646).
ARTICLE 7 - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. The City shall provide for the
operations, maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government of all
facilities developed to support project recreation opportunities. The City •
shall provide for the maintenance of all project lands, waters, and facilities
to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer.
:?yy
ARTICLE 8 - RELEASE OF CLAIMS. The Government and its officers and employees
-. shall not be liable in any manner to the City for or on account of damage
caused by the development, operation and maintenance of the recreation
facilities of the Project. The City hereby releases the Government and agrees
to hold it free and harmless and to indemnify it from all damages, claims or
demands that may result from development, operation and maintenance of the
recreation areas and facilities.
ARTICLE g - TRANSFER OF ASSIGNMENT. The City shall not transfer or assign
this contract nor any rights acquired thereunder, nor grant any interest,
privilege or license whatsoever in connection with this contract without the
approval of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative except
as provided in Article 4 of this contract.
ARTICLE 10 - DEFAULT. In the event the City fails to meet any o£ its
obligations under this agreement, the Government may terminate the whole or
any part of this contract. The rights and remedies of the Government provided
in this Article shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights
and remedies provided by law or under this contract.
ARTICLE it - EXAMINATION OF RECORDS. The Government and the City shall
maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence pertaining to costs and
expense incurred under this contract, to the extent and in such detail as will
properly reflect all net costs, direct and indirect, of labor, materials,
equipment, supplies, and services and other costs and expenses of whatever
nature involved herein. The Government and the City shall make available at
their offices at reasonable times, the accounting records for inspection and
• audit by an authorized representative of the parties to this contract during
the period this contract is in effect.
ARTICLE 12 - RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. The parties to this contract act in an
independent capacity in the performance of their respective functions under
this contract and neither party is to be considered the officer, agent, or
employee of the other.
ARTICLE 13 - INSPECTION. The Government shall at all times have the right to
make inspections concerning the operation and maintenance of the lands and
facilities to he provided hereunder.
ARTICLE 14 - OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT. No member of or delegate to the
Congress, or Resident Commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of
this contract, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom; but this provision
shall not be construed to extend to this contract if made with a corporation
for its general benefit.
ARTICLE 15 - COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES. The City warrants that no
person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure
this contract upon agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage,
brokerage, or contingent fee, except bona fide employees or bona fide
established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the City for the
purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
Government shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or in
its discretion to add to the contract price or consideration, or otherwise
recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or
contingent fee.
3 1'
ARTICLE 16 - ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
a) In furtherance of the purpose and policy of the National Environmental •
Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91 -190, 42 U.S.C. 4321, 4331 -4335) and
Executive Order 11514, entitled "Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality," March 5, 1970 (35 Federal Register 4247, March
7, 1970) the Government and the City recognize the importance of
preservation and enhancement of the quality of the environment and the
elimination of environmental pollution. Actions by either party will
be after consideration of all possible effects upon the project
environmental resources and will incorporate adequate and appropriate
measures to insure that the quality of the environment will not be
degraded or unfavorably altered.
b) During construction and operation undertaken by either the Government
or the City, specific actions will be taken to control environmental
pollution which could result from their activities and to comply with
applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations concerning
environmental pollution. Particular attention should be given to (1)
reduction Of air pollution by control of burning, minimization of
dust, containment of chemical vapors, and control of engine exhaust
gases and smoke from temporary heaters; (2) reduction of water
pollution by control of sanitary facilities, storage of fuels and
other contaminants, and control of turbidity and siltation from
erosion; (3) minimization of noise levels; (4) on and offsite disposal
of waste and spoil activities; and (5) prevention of landscape
defacement and damage. •
ARTICLE 17 - EFFECTIVE DATE. This contract shall take effect upon approval by
the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this contract as of the
day and year first above written.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By By
Colonel, Corps of Engineers Mayor of the City of
Commanding Rancho Cucamonga
Contracting Officer
DATE DATE
APPROVED: ATTEST
By By
Deputy Commander, USACE City Clerk
Authorized Representative
Secretary of the Army
DATE DATE
•
3/6
•
CERTIFICATION
I, . as Attorney for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing
agreement executed by
Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is within the
scope of his authority, and that in my capacity as Chief Legal Officer for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, I have considered the legal effects of Section 221
of the Flood Control Act of 1940 (42 U.S.C. 1962 -5b) and find that the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, is legally and financially capable of
entering into the contractual obligations obtained in the foregoing agreement
and that, upon acceptance it will be legally enforceable.
Given under my hand, this day of 198
City Attorney
City of Rancho Cucamonga
3/I
Exhibit A. Estimated Separable Recreation Costs.
Phase I Recreation Development for Cucamonga Creek and Tributaries
•
Location
Item
Itemized Costs
Total Coats
Heritage Park Area:
Bridge (H -10)
$18,000
$74,000
Bridge (H -10)
18,000
Bridge (H -20)
38,000
Confluence Area:
Bridge (H-20)
20,000
47,200
Landscape A Irrig.
3,500
Grading A Hardscape
3,500
Shelters (2)
18,000
Water Fountain
1,200 .,
Furnishings
1,000
19th St. Area:
Underpass
105,000
105,000
Baseline Area:
Bridge (H -10)
20,000
265,500
(Creekside Park)
Utilities
17,500
Restroom
50,500
Shelters (2)
18,000
Parking Lot
28,000
Hardscape
18,500
Grading 6 Drainage
12,500
Landscape A Irrig.
71,500
Furnishings
6,000
•
Underpass
23,000
Trail Development:
Hardseape
4,000
70,500
Gates
500
Signs
7,500
Landscape
3,000
Trail Constr. (Grad-
55,500
ing, clearing, etc.)
Subtotal
$562,200
Contingency (15%)
84,330
Subtotal
646,530
Engineering A Design
(10%) 64,653
Supervision A Adminis. (6i) 38
792
Total
$749.975
Adjusted Total
$750,000
8 is
2 /2
ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECTIVE
• UNDER TITLE VI OF CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "Applicant - Recipient")
HEREBY AGREES THAT it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (P.L. 88 -352) and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the
Department of Defense Directive 5500.11, December 18, 1964 issued pursuant to
that title, to the end that, in accordance with title VI of that Act and the
Directive, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color,
sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or
activity for which the Applicant- Recipient receives Federal financial
assistance from the Department of the Army, and HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it
will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.
If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid
of Federal financial assistance extended to the Applicant - Recipient by the
Department of the Army, assurance shall obligate the Applicant - Recipient, in
the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period
during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose involving
the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is so
provided, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant - Recipient for the period
during which it retains ownership or possession of the property. In all other
cases, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant - Recipient for the period
during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to it by the
Department of the Army.
• THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining
any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other
Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Applicant -
Recipient by the Department, including installment payments after such date on
account of arrangements for Federal financial assistance which were approved
before such date. The Applicant - Recipient recognizes and agrees that such
Federal financial assistance will be extended in reliance on the
representations and agreements made in this assurance, and the United States
have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this assurance. This assurance
is binding on the Applicant- Recipient, its auccessors, transferees, and
assignees and the person or persons whose signatures appear below are
authorized to sign this assurance on behalf of the Applicant- Recipient.
By
City of Rancho Cucamonga
(Applicant- Recipient)
(Applicant - Recipient's Mailing Address)
EXHIBIT B
.7/C/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 20, 19$4
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner
Y ^
I'T
Z
>>
1977
SUBJECT: FONTANA'S REQUEST TO ANNEX A PORTION OF OUR EXISTING
Based on the Council's direction, the staff has been analyzing the
proposed Annexation No. 114 by the City of Fontana. You will recall
that the land in question contains approximately 640 acres and is
located just north of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, along
the easterly boundaries of our sphere of influence.
To date, we have examined the various service and planning issues
• associated with the annexation request, and met with LAIC staff to point
out the City's strong opposition to the proposed annexation. We noted
the City's position based on the following reasons.
1. Impacts of Development on the City of Rancho Cucamonga
It is our contention t amt the deve of the property in
question will have a direct and severe impact on the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, whereas the effect on Fontana will be indirect and
minimal. The area is contiguous to Rancho Cucamonga City Limits and
is predominately accessible from and through the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Rancho Cucamonga would experience the traffic impacts
generated in this area. The City's drainage infrastructure would
also be adversely impacted by this proposal.
2. Public Services
ervice eves and requirements are defined by projected land uses
and types of development; that is type and level of service is
directly related to the type and intensity of development outlined
j in the City's Comprehensive General Plan. Fontana's application for
annexation claims that adequate municipal services will be provided
upon annexation of the area in question to Fontana. In our opinion,
it is premature on Fontana's part to claim the ability to service
the area prior to making a determination on the type and scope of
services and prior to defining the appropriate land uses and the
intensity of land uses. We have re- examined the service
implications associated with the area in question. From the service
perspective, there appears to be no reason why the established
sphere of influence boundaries should be shifted as proposed.
2 ;? :)
0
31 Plannin Process
IS iTh s perhaps the most important of the issues. The area in
question has been in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of
Influence since incorporation in 1977. Since then, the City has
undergone a long process of defining its identity, identifying its
goals and developing a series of comprehensive documents intended to
provide a sense of direction to all of those involved in the process
of growth and development, including City and County residents,
property owners and developers, public officials, and numerous
public agencies. This process was based in substantial part on
assumptions about the ultimate physical boundaries of the City, its
service areas, and the type and scope of development, as defined by
the established spheres of influence. The result of this planning
process is a sensitive balance of elements outlined in the City's
General Plan and Specific Plans including circulation and land use
plans, capital improvement program, drainage plans and service
master plans of areas cooperating agencies, and a myriad other
considerations. To change all of this because of one property
owner's desire to circumvent the process and to manipulate
established boundaries undermines the credibility of the planning
process of the City and County. It is a signal to property owners
everywhere that public agencies may be played off against one •
another for the benefit of a few.
A letter outlining the staff's position along with these views on
services and the planning process has been submitted to LAFC staff. A
copy of the letter is attached for your review.
The LAFC staff is now in the process of preparing a staff report to
their commission. A hearing at LAFC has been tentatively scheduled for
July 11. Staff will present a Re_�lution for the City Council's
consideration and adoption which outlines the Council's official
position regarding this proposed annexation for presentation to the LAFC
Board on July 11, 1984.
I.
ResppActtfol ly�su�ni tted,
Rick ,Gonez!
CityiPlarMer
RG:OK:jr
iAttachments: Position Letter to LAFC
3 a/
11
n.���,
NK
� � Y Y,•` "�f� ' �, _I,t`1��i. � !'tip.' � f�.� r� � ' � � . \ , ^'
�, � ,(fir � /�. ',r � -�5 —'v ^+t.•.;.1 r;'S /. - �- 1• 4�V •
`"� iii � ..,� }rr \,a nb ,,1e'. � •'[
12
�•"� ` 24 19 I 0
u I
F ,
27... , 26 r 2S . .l0 I
s �•.
—1.. MI OM6,ANC AVE ' j W� ..
i
t Q..
24 a; 39
4
35 75
.... .�•ro..� 31 I
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
+s
6a Y.wrJtltl D. ati4ela
(7,
� O
FZ f.wt «1...
Charles J. Ruguet 11 Jeffte� KA x
19» Richard N. Ilshl Pamela J. NTiaht
June 14, 1984
Mr. Larry H. Hendon, Executive Officer
Local Agency Formation Commission
825 East Third, Room 201
San Bernardino, California 92415
SUBJECT: FONTANA ANNEXATION No. 114
Dear Larry:
Please consider this to be the City's initial response to your inquiry
regarding the proposed annexation by the City of Fontana of a portion of the
City's existing sphere of influence. Our position is based on a thorough re-
examination of issues relative to provision of services and the planning
process.
• The proposed annexation of our sphere is an attempt on the part of the
property owner to manipulate political boundaries for his own benefit. We
feel strongly that the subject property should remain within the existing
established sphere of influence boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
because of the related impacts of development on the City, its relationship to
the City, and ability of the City and cooperating agencies to provide
appropriate and timely municipal services.
The development of the property in question will have a direct and severe
impact on the City of Rancho Cucamonga, whereas the effect on Fontana will be
indirect and minimal. The area is contiguous to Rancho Cucamonga City Limits
and is predominately accessible from and through the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Fontana's recently extended City Limits stop at the south side of
the Devore Freeway. The only contiguous boundary to the proposed annexation
is a t 1500 foot stretch of the Devore Freeway, with no way of direct
access. This area is isolated from the City of Fontana other than through the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Rancho Cucamonga would experience the traffic impacts generated in this
area. Even if Duncan Canyon Road is extended at some point, in the future and
on -ramps and off -ramps are provided at Duncan Canyon and I -15, regional
traffic patterns show a strong southwesterly tendency. Consequently, traffic
generated in this area will still be attracted to Cherry and I -15 Freeway
access, located within Rancho Cucamonga's current limits. This would mean
that Fontana police would have to depend on a circuitous access route across
Duncan Canyon overpass and Summit on their patrols, or access the area
Is directly off Cherry Avenue, through the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3aY
9320 BASELINE ROAD. SUITE C • POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 - 17111889.1971
Larry Hendon, Executive Officer
Subj: Fontana Annexation No. 114
June 14, 1984
Page 2
•
Rancho Cucamonga's drainage infrastructure, would be adversely impacted by
this proposal. Regardless of political boundaries, drainage will imoact
Rancho Cucamonga. The City is well aware of the drainage and flood control
problems inherent to the region, and is actively involved in a massive
regional effort to eliminate hazards to public safety and property. However,
regional efforts must be supplemented by localized drainage facilities, best
planned and implemented by those directly affected.
SERVICES
er
5 vice levels and requirements are defined by projected land uses and types
of development; that is type and level of service is directly related to the
type and intensity of development outlined in the City's Comprehensive General
Plan. Fontana's application for annexation claims that adequate municipal
services will be provided upon annexation of the area in question to
Fontana. In our opinion, it is premature on Fontana's part to claim the
ability to service the area prior to making a determination on the type and
scope of services and prior to defining the appropriate land uses and the
intensity of these land uses.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has examined and re- examined service implications
associated with the area in question. From the service perspective, there
appears to be no reason why the established sphere of influence boundaries .
should be shifted as p- oposed. The services necessary throughout the area are
outlined below.
Fire Protection: The City and its established sphere is within the current
service district boundaries and master plan of the Foothill Fire Protection
District. The District's master plan for fire protection includes the area in
question. Preliminary discussions indicate the District's ability and desire
to serve the established sphere at the time of development. In terms of fire
protection, it appears advantageous to retain established sphere boundaries.
Police Protection: The City contracts for police services with the County
Sheriff. The Rancho Cucamonga station currently provides efficient and cost
effective police protection for the City and the established sphere of
influence. With the City's cooperation, new police facilities are planne- for
the civic center site and the Sheriff indicates the ability and willinar ; to
serve the area in question as it develops.
Fontana police have no means of direct access to the annexatioe area, other
than through the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as already noted. in terms of
police protection, there is no advantage in shifting the established sohe,e as
proposed.
Water and Sewer: Water service is within the certif'cated boundaries of
ontana Water ompany, a small and independent private company not connected
with the City of Fontana. The CCWD, the agency responsible for provi:ing •
water service in Rancho Cucamonga, has an adopted master plan of water seer ce
for our sphere that includes the area in question, and will be able to se -ie
the area if requested. Its current boundaries, however, stop at Cherry
Avenue.
3 ar
Larry Hendon, Executive Officer
Subjt Fontana Annexation No. 114
June 14, 1984
Page 3
Sewer line extensions are not currently planned north of Route 30. This was
done purposefully, based on land -use projected for the areas and CC'HO Policies
(consistent with state and regional policies) which encourage ground water
reclamation through the use of septic tanks, package treatment plants, and
other means. The area north of Route 30, including the area proposed for
annexation, is unique in that the depth of the water table and soil conditions
are favorable for ground water reclamation. However, preliminary discussions
with CCWD indicates that if existing sewer lines are extended through private
efforts (as in the Fontana proposal) . CCWD would be able to provide
appropriate service to the area.
There appears to be no advantage in shifting the existing boundaries based on
water and sewer needs.
Schools: The area is within the boundaries of the Etiwanda Wtool District
an the Chaffey Union High School District with its new high school site in
Etiwanda. Both will serve the area in question at the time of development.
There is no reason to shift established sphere boundaries because of school
service areas.
Other Mut foal Services: Other services, such as parks and recreation,
• street maintenance, streets and related improvements, lighting and landscaping
maintenance and similar services will be provided by the City at the time of
annexation. There is nothing to indicate that the services can be better
provided by the City of Fontana. On the contrary init4a1 access problems to
the area will have a negative effect on Fontana's abili-, to serve the area in
a cost efficient manner because ofits isolated location.
There is no advantage in shifting the established boundaries based on these
municipal services.
PLANNING PROCESS
The area in question has been in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's SPhe•e of
Influence since incorporation in 1977. Since then, the City has undergone a
long process of defining its identity, identifying its goals and developing a
series of comprehensive documents intended to provide a sense of direction to
all of those involved in the process of growth and development, including City
and County residents, property owners and developers, public officials, and
numerous public agencies. This process was based in substantial part on
assumptions about the ultimate physical boundaries of the City, its service
areas, and the type and scope of development, as defined by the established
Spheres of influence. The result of this planning process is a sensitive
balance of elements outlined in the City's General Plan and Specific Plans
including circulation and land use plans, capital improvement program,
drainage plans and service master plans of areas cooperating agencies, and a
myriad other considerations. To change all of this because of one property
owner's desire to circumvent the process and to manipulate established
boundaries undermines the credibility of the planning process of the City and
County. It is a signal to property owners everywhere that public agencies may
be played off against one another for the benefit of a few.
3 2(�
Larry Hendon, Executive Officer
Subj: Fontana Annexation No. 114
June 14, 1984
Page 4
We hope this clarifies our position on the proposed annexation of the existing
portion of Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence and that the information
provided will assist LAW staff in making a recommendation to the LAFC Board
that takes into consideration the ability to provide services, the effects of
,.development on each City, as well as the validity of the planning process
which are currently established within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Respectfully,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Rick Gomez
City Planner
RG:OK:jr
3 a'7
E
u
•
i
r1
Li
`1
I'LL va'aa[aaw aav vv v,"aawwwca C
MEMORANDUM'
i.
Date: June 15, 1981
To: City Council and City Manager
i
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department .. 19,
Subject: Agreement with RNR Associates for Electrical Engineering
Services at Alta Loma Park
At a recent meeting of the Council Park Development Committee, Couneilmembers
Dahl and King requested a study be made to:
Determine the most viable site available to install night lighted
soccer fields,
2. Determine approximate cost of such improvements; and,
3. Determine if the American Youth Soccer Organization would be
interested in sharing the construction and operational costs of such
improvements.
As proper sport field lighting is a very specialized area of endeavor, staff
contacted Jared Andrews of RNR Associates, specialists in the field, for
assistance in answering questions 1 and 2.
Location
Three sites were evaluated: Alta Loma Park: Alta Loam Junior High School;
and, Cucamonga Junior High School. For efficiency in lighting, lower cost of
installation, and, limiting possible environmental impacts, it was determined
that Alta Loma Park was the superior site for this type of improvement.
Cost Estimates
Two options were looked at for lighting the soccer fields at Alta Loma Park.
Option 1 discussed lighting only the east field and Option 2 addressed
lighting both fields at the park.
Option 1 (East Field only)
Design and Engineering Services . . . . $4,800
Construction Estimate . . . . $60- 70,000 (bid required)
Option 2 (Both Fields)
Design and Engineering Services 58,000
Construction Estimates . . . . $100- 115,000 (bid required)
continued ...
3; P
page 2
memo 6/15/84
re: Electrical Engineering Services /Alta Loma Park •
AYSO Participation
In discussions with AYSO Regional Commissioner, Sandi Oerly, she indicated her
organization's support for participating in the project, conceptually on a
50/50 basis for construction and operation.
Staff Comment
Soccer is one of the met actively engaged in sports in our community. AYSO
as an organization is the largest single sports group in Rancho Cucamonga with
growing involvement and participation each year. The addition of lights to
the soccer fields at Alta Loma Park is the most viable, economical way to meet
the additional field needs of this activity in the shortest amount of time
possible.
Staff Recommendation
I .) Authorize award of design and engineering professional services
contract to RNR Associates for design and engineering services to
install field lighting on the east and west soccer fields at Alta Loma
Park in the amount of $8,000 from the Park Development Account;
(Staff recommends that the Design cost not be a shared expense, but
one of City responsibility.) and •
2.) Authorize staff to proceed with developing an agreement with AYSO for
joint participation in construction and operation of field lighting
improvements.
If I can provide further information, please advise.
BR /mw
3�y
r-
6-1
LL
_
Cp 111XIM RiC011" e1G1a4Rt
AUOCkA t 2950 AIRWAY AVENUE. SUITE D6 • COSTA MESA. CA 92626-6096 • 714/557 -9671
May 23, 1984
CITY OF RANCHO COCIIM MGA
9320 Baseline Road Suite C
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn: Mr. Richard Myer
Ref: Alta Looa Park
Soccer Field Lighting Project
Dear Dick:
We are classed to submit our proposal for the above referenced
project. The following shall represent our scope of service=_.
A. Scope of Work
1. Coordinate electrical service to the Soccer Pields.
• 2. Design pole locations and quantity of lights per
pole.
3. Design all fixture mounting details.
3. Design of the lightirg levels utilizirc h:gh press-,;re
sodium lamps for recreation and also soccer play.
5. Design switching control and wiring diagrams,
6. Attend all design coordination meetings as require .
(3 Meetings)
7. Provide an electrical cost estimate at com_oletion of
electrical design work.
8. Pole locations will be designed so that pales located
between field could support lights for both fields.
9. Design security lighting as required.
10. Provide a complete electrical specification.
11. Electrical services shall be calculated to operate 2
soccer fields, 4 tennis courts and related security
lighting.
t
A C&FORPAA CORPORATION
Page 2
May 23, 1984
City of Rancho Cacaon9a
Alta Loan Park
i
•
B. Scope of Work - SOILS
Provide necessary soil testing and reports as needed, if
required.
C. Construction Support
I. Visit project site when requested by owner and /or
architect during construction.
2. Provide final review or electrical punch list as
required.
3. Answer all field questions as required.
4. Review all electrically related shop drawings.
5. Printing cost other than for inter - office coordination
during design phase of work.
6. Building Department permits and /or fees.
7. Submission of electrical drawings into Building Department. •
D. Extra Services
1. Work resulting from changes by the city after electrical
designs have been completed.
2. Additional work resulting from changes by the city after
electrical designs have been completed.
3. ?tees not included in Paragraphs A, S, and C above.
E. Compensation
1. Reimbursement for the design of one soccer field and
electrical services shall be on a fixed fee basis of
Four Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($4,800.00).
2. Reimbursement fox the designs of two soccer fields and
electrical services shall be on a fixed fee basis
of Eight Thousand ($8,000.00).
3. Reimbursement for paragraph B shall be on a fixed fee
basis of Two Thousand Do.lars.($2,000.00)
•
3.T/
Page 3
May 23, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Alta Loma Park
E. compensation (continued)
4. Reimbursement for paragraph C shall be on a time and
material basis at our current hourly rates.
Principal $60.00
Project Manager $45.00
Draftsman $30.00
P. Invoice and Payments
At the end of each calendar month during which the engineer
performs work in connection with work described, the engineer
shall tender an invoice to owner setting forth the following:
1. Total contract amount.
2. Percentage costs reimburseable to engineer.
Owner shall pay the total amount due under invoice within.
thirty (30) days after receipt of the invoice. Accounts
• over thirty (30) days are subject to a service charge cf
1.5% per month on unpaid amounts.
0
14
H. Abandonment
In the event the entire or part of the project is abandoned,
the owner shall be written notice and advise the engineer to
stop work in those areas being abandoned, At such time the
compensation will be the last progress billing plus a mutually
agreed upon amount 'for work executed since that billing, Ali,
work shall terminate until such time the owner by written
notice ad,,- :sea the engineer to continue such work.
1, Arbitration.
All questions in dispute under this agreement may be submitted
to arbitration when practical in accordance with the provisions
of the American. Arbitration Association. The prevailing party
shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees to be fixed
by the Arbitrator; or in the event there are judicial
proceedings instead of arbitration, reasonable attorneys'
fees to be fixed by the court.
32 1=
'May 23, 1985
City of Rancho Cacawongn
Alta Law& Park
' J. Insurance
Each party to this - agreement shall carry and maintain public
liability, property damage and workmen's compensation insurance,
and in addition, insurance to protect him from claims arising
out of the performance of his professional services caused
by the acts, errors or omissions of each party of his employees
or others for whom he is legally responsible.
If this meets with your approval, please acknowledge your acceptance
by signing the enclosed copy in the appropriate location and returning
the copy for our files.
Sincerely,
RTES, INC..
Ra
President
Electrical Designs •
for one Soccer Field
Accepted By: _Dater___,
Electrical Designs
for Two Soccer °ields
Accepted By: Date:
RAR /laf
P- 127 -84
Enclosure
233
CONSWf4G MCiMGI lNGIEGM
AssoClateS 2950 AIRWA`/ AVENUE. SUI ?E D6 COSTA MESA CA 1)2626-6096 714/557 -9671
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 29, I994
9310 Baseline Road Suite C
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn: Mr. Richard Mager
Ref: Alta Lowe Park Proposal
- Dear Dick: ,
We have reviewed your proposed project_ and have determined that the
estimated construction cost would be $60,000.00 to $70,000.00 for
construction of one soccer field and $100,000.00 to 5:15,000.00 for
construction of both soccer fields. These prices do not include
lighting for the tennis court.
If, in the event you have any questions regarding our proposal
• dated may 23, 1994 or our estimated construction Cost, please
do not hesitate to call_
sincerely,
RNR TS's, INC.
A.
president -
RAPIlaF
8 1779 84'' ikAK •w,s �:i• ` '' �.
. 1•i+ XYOa�TkI'
" r x
rvWr=
CORPORATION r �' w
�me c—
TRACT 12532-A
cl
I- fit
-U
_777
Ey
L�F=
Qh
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:
STREET TREE - 1 15 -GAL, a 30' D.C. AVERAGE
FRONT YARD
IRRIGATION
TREES
- "PERMANENT"
- 1 15 -GAL,
1 5 -GAL,
SHRUBS - 0
VINES - 0
GROUND COVER - "SEEDED"
CITY OF
RANCHO CCCINIO \GA
PLANNING DIVISION
EXCEEDING MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:
TREES - 1 15 -GAL,
SHRUBS - 12 5 -GAL,
18 1 -GAL, // \I
VINES - 2 1 -GAL, NORTH
ITEXI: Ir 1 fry!M
TITLE; VAID L O Irl"
EXI IIRIT; SCALE:
CHI Computer Systems, Inc.
9375 Archibald Avenue 4203
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
714 -980 -1816
June 21, 1984
Mrs. Beverly Authelet RE: Mayoral Election
City Clerk Procedure Proposal
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mrs. Authelet,
In response to the recent public call for review of the Mayoral
election procedure I submit the following proposed election
protocol for distribution to members of the City Council, City
Staff, Citizens Advisory Committee and interested parties.
This proposal is based on four premises:
1. The Voting Public has the right to elect a Mayor by popular
vote;
2. Mayoral Candidates must be fully aware of and inclined to
accept the responsibilities of a seated Council member
before they bid for the added duties of Mayor;
3. The City cannot afford to lose the talents of an experienced
Council member, or the special qualities of a new Mayoral
Candidate through the separate and rather arbitrary
declaration of an unsuccessful Mayoral bid;
4. The Voting public should be given an up -front opportunity to
judge a candidate qualified to serve on Council, but not
perhaps qualified to serve as Mayor.
The procedure is outlined as follows:
1. The biannual Council election schedule and four year Council
terms are retained;
2. Selection of Mayor will be open to the vote of the public:
a. Mayoral terms shall be two years in length;
b. The Mayor will be selected on the same ballot as Council
members.
RE: Mayoral Election -2- June 21, 1984
Procedure Proposal
c. Seated Council members, Council members up for re-
election and new candidates may all run for Mayor,
having declared their interest up- front.
3. Vote will take the following form:
a. Voters will first choose City Council members from among
the roster of Council members up for re- election and new
candidates;
b. Voters will then choose a Mayor from the roster of
seated Council members, council members up for
re- election and new candidates who had declared Mayoral
candidacy.
c. The successful Council Candidate or seated incumbent
with the majority Mayoral vote count is thereby elected
Mayor.
The possible advantages of this approach are manifold:
1. The electoral process is opened fully to the electorate:
the Mayor is selected by popular vote.
2. "Second Tiering" offers voters the opportunity to make two
separate but related decisions according to a common set of
selection criteria.
a. A Mayoral candidate is "pre - qualified" for Mayor by
being elected to Council before being judged on
additional leadership potential. This forces scrutiny
of an individual's claims and qualifications in the
context of his or her qualification for Council in
general, not just in the context of their popularity
relative to any other Mayoral candidate.
3. Permitting seated incumbents not up for Council re- election
to "run" for Mayor is beneficial in several ways:
a. First, the electorate is offered a wider choice of
qualified candidates. Their selection range includes
Council members whose qualification by experience and
public service record would otherwise be excluded from
consideration simply by accident of the turn of the
biannual election schedule.
RE: Mayoral Election -3- June 21, 1984
Procedure Proposal
b. Second, seated incumbents who might otherwise rest
quietly in their Council seats for the next two years
and hope for a Mayor seat by virtue of eventual
seniority on Council are given a pressing incentive to
get out and generate the kind of public record which,
under public scrutiny, qualifies them for the additional
leadership responsibilities and prestige.
This would tend to bring the Councilpersons to the
Community; indeed, such outreach would be virtually
prerequisite to Mayoral election.
c. Third, this Mayoral vote may afford the electorate and
the City a means of Coucil performance review less
divisive, disruptive and costly than recall referendum,
insofar as a losing bid may be open to interpretation as
a negative judgement on the performance of the
candidate.
4. Council members otherwise up for re- election need not
automatically forfeit their tenure on the City Council to
run for Mayor. This has several important implications:
a. The number of Council seats open for election each term
is predictable, save for resignations. This allows
planning by Candidates, City and electorate alike, and
reduces the "wild card" phenomenon.
b. Assured loss of a Council seat resulting from loss of
Mayoral bid "ups the stakes" for a seated incumbent,
tending to politicize their actions on Council well in
advance of declaration of Mayoral intention.
c. The City doesn't risk loss of an otherwise competent and
qualified Councilperson through the separate and
arbitrary negative declaration in a losing Mayoral bid.
RE: Mayoral Election -4- June 21, 1984
Procedure Proposal
Naturally this proposal must be assayed for its compliance with
State election law, which I leave up to the City Attorney and
Council. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at the above number.
:cmo /PowerText
Best Regards,
Bruce A. Chitiea
President