Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1983/03/16 - Agenda Packet
OUCn.NQA ��O � CITY OF i RANCHO CUCAMONGA • _,ter o CITY COUNCIL v AGEl EA 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California March 16, 1983 - 7 :30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Buquet_l , Dahl < , Frost Schlosser_, and Mikels .�. C. Approval of Minutes: February 2, 1983, February 7, • 1983, February 10, 1983. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Thursday, March 17, 1963, 7:00 p.m. - PARKS COMMITTEE, Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. b. Thursday, March 24, 1983, 7:00 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION, Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. c. Presentation of Proclamation proclaiming Saturday, March 19,1983 as Red Cross Appreciation Day. d. Presentation of Proclamation to Jeff King commending him for his service to the Community as a Planning Commissioner. 3• CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83- 03 -16, and Payroll 1 ending 03 -06 -83 in the amount of $698,840.60. City Council Agenda -2- March 16, 1983 • b. Forward Claim by Roy and Dannie Ratliff to the City 4 Attorney for handling. c. Approve and execute informal contract for the completion 6 -. 4 of Vineyard Avenue Street Improvements FAU M /MR- R194(2) to Riverside Construction *CO., the low bidder at $255,054.40. d. Approve acceptance of the Carnelian Street Improvements (05- 06 -55) and authorize the city engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and to release performance surety and retention. Release Performance Bond $144,712,82 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -29 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS (05- 06 -55) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. 3- Approval of agreement with Donald G. King A Assoc. as 5e. Environmental Impact Consultant for the Alta Loma • Channel Assessment District. f. Approval of Parcel Map 7797, Bonds, and Agreement - R. 19 C. Associates, II, - located on the south side of 8th Street approximately 440 feet east of Pittsburgh Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -30 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7797, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. g. Approval of extension agreement for Tract i1696 23 located on the west side of Sapphire Street at Garden Court submitted by Vanguard Builders. RESOLUTION N0. 93 -31 24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT E %TENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11696. h. Approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Contract Change 28 Order No. 2 relating to the reconstruction of Rochester Avenue, south of 8th Street. City Council Agenda -3- March 16, 1983 • i. Approval of Parcel Map 7864, Bonds, and Agreement - 34 American Industries (Biane Winery) located on the south _ side of 8th Street, west of Turner Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83-32 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7864, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. j. Release of Bonds: 43 Tract 9193 - located on the west side of Vineyard, south of Base Line - Owner: William Lyon Co. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $70,000 Tract 9262 - located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Base Line - Owner: William Lyon Co. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $20,000 RESOLUTION NO. 83-33 44 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 9193 AND 9262 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. k. Release of T.O.P. Bonds to Lewis Homes: 47 Tract 9454 #42- 1047036 $2,000 Tract 9454 p42- 1048943 $ 500 Tract 9567 A42- 1063769 $2,294 Tract 9567 #42- 1063751 $ 575 Tract 11461 U42- 1075342 $ 500 1. Forward Claim against the City by Steve and Deborah 49 Weddle to the city attorney for handling. m. Approval of desiGnation of $500,000 from reserves to the 52 General Fund for cash flow purposes. o. Set public hearing for April 6, 1983 for Environmental Assessment and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -01. An amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.08.160 and 1.08.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding home occupation permits. p. Set public hearing for April 6, 1983 for Housing Assistance Plan for Community Development Block Grant Program. 0 City Council Agenda -4- March 16, 1983 q. Set public hearing for April 6, 1983 for Community Develooment Block Grant Program Statement of Objectives for 1083 -84. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -06 - TENTATIVE TRACT 12320 - L A G. A change of zone from R- 3-T (multiple family residential) to R -3 /PD (multiple family residential /planned development) and the development of 116 condominiums on 8.98 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue - APN 202 - 181 -07. (First reading held on March 2, 1983. ...... r' ORDINANCE NO. 195 (second reading) 53 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 181 -07, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND VICTORIA AVENUES, FROM R -3-T • TO R -3 /PD. B. VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET. Vacation of a 54 portion of 7th Street adjacent to California Finished Metals located on the southeast corner of 7th Street and Center Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -34 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET. C. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A TRANSIENT 61 OCCUPANCY TAX. An Ordinance proposing a transient occupancy tax for motels. Staff report by Harry Empey, Finance Director. ORDINANCE NO. 197 (first reading) 63 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.40 THERETO TO IMPOSE A TAX UPON THE PRIVILEGE OF TH;g31ENT OCCUPANCY. r' City Council Agenda -5- March 16, 1983 • D. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADMISSIONS TAR. An Ordinance proposing an admissions tax for _ theaters and similar recreational activities. Staff report by Harry Empey, Finance Director. ORDINANCE NO. 198 (first reading) 68, ���,, (-1C, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.36 THERETO TO IMPOSE AN ADMISSIONS TAX. E. VACATION OF SERVICE ROAD - PARCEL MAP 6114. It is 69 requested that the public hearing for the vacation of the service road located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard in connection with Parcel Map 6114 be continued to May 4, 1983 F. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 4 AND 7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 71 87, CREATING AN ADVISORY COMISSION. Proposed amendments to the ordinance will create a Chairman from the membership of the Advisory Commission to serve one year at the Commission's pleasure, and fix terms of new members of the Advisory Commission at two years. Staff report by Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager. ORDINANCE NO. 87 -A (first reading) 75 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.28.040 AND 2.28.070 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MINICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO TERMS OF APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS AND OFFICERS. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF WAIVER OF OFF -SITE 78 74. IMPROVEMENTS. A request has been submitted to the City„ "' Council to consider the waiver of off -site improvements located on Sierra Vista Drive. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. D. STORM DAMAGE STATUS REPORT - CONSULTANT SELECTION. °d3M 95 Summary of propress on storm damage repair and rquest� authorization to retain L.D. King Engineering to prepare plans and specifications for the repair of damaged streets. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. 10 City Council Agenda -6- March 16, 1983 C. UPDATE ON STATUS OF ETIUANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. Staff will 96 present an overview of the schedule for the Etiwanda , Specific Plan, and request that Council consider setting the date of Monday, April 11, as the first public hearing. Staff report by Jack Lam, Community Development Director. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council set April 11, 1983 for public hearing on the draft Etiwanda Specific Plan, Draft EIR, and General Plan Amendment. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION' 5 98 REGARDING THE SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS. The City Council requested the Advisory Commission to review the City's existing policies relative to the sale of safe and sane f'_reworks and forward specific recommendations relative to: (1) quantity of booths allowed in the City, (2) who is expected to be final beneficiary of the sales, (3) who should be allowed to sell, and (4) how to increase safety factor. Staff report by Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager. 9) 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 12 A 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. DISCUSSION OF THE LAS VEGAS SUPER -SPEED RAIL. The 124 feasibility study to determine the viability of constructing a high- speed /super -speed transportation system linking Los Angeles with Las Vegas is completed. The report states that a 250 mph Maglev system can be built by 1991 and will operate profitably. Item requested by Mayor Mikes. B. DISCUSSION REGARDING MEDIAN ISLANDS FOR THE CITY. Item 129 requested by Councilman Dahl. C. DISCUSSION REGARDING STREET "A ^. AS IT CONCERNS THE 130 INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN. Street located parallel to Haven Avenue on east side between 4th and 6th Streets between Utica and Haven. Item requested by Councilman Dahl, D. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING 132 COMMISSION. R. ADJOURNMENT • February 2, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, February 2, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were Council members: Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; City Planner, flick Gomez; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes: Mayor Mikels requested that the minutes of January 19, 1983 be removed in order that a section be checked against the tapes. • 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Thursday, February 3, 1983, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. b. Monday, February 7, 1983, 7:30 p.m. - TERRA VISTA PLAN HEARING /CITY COUNCIL - Lions Park Community Center. c. Thursday, February 10, 1983, 7:00 p.m. - FOOTHILL FIRE. DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS - Lions Park Community Center. d. Thursday, February 10, 6:00 p.m. - JOINT CITY COUNCIL /PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - Magic Lamp. e. Mayor Mikels presented a Resolution of the City of San Bernardino requesting the Council to join them in opposition to a proposal by the County of San Bernardino which would permit detachment from a City without specific permission of the municipality's governing body. Mayor Mikels directed staff to look into this and to bring the item back at the next meeting for Council's consideration. i. Mayor Mikels presented a report from a recent CLOUT meeting in Sacramento at which local councilmembers and chamber representatives lobbied legislators regarding issues such as the airport ground access, Route 71 and 30. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Buquet requested that item "f" be pulled for discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83 -01 -30 and Payroll Register ending 83 -01 -23 in the amount of $1,108,159.49 and Warrant Register No. 83 -02 -02 in the amount of $120,939.07. b. Forward Claim against the City by Jill Marie and Richard P. Ivy to the City Attorney for handling. c. Forward Claim against the City by Eric J. and Larry Klock to the City Attorney for handling. d. Forward Claim against the City by Ronald Payne to Carl Warren Insurance Company for handling. e. Alcoholic Beverage Application for on -sale beer and wine eating place license by Richard A. Rodino, Mamma's Leone's, 9155 Archibald Avenue, Unit C. f. Approval of Agreemeate to emtea9 "ty Off #ee Gamp ea 6eaee Agreeweats through dose 39r 4944. Item pulled for discussion. IV g. Approval of Agreement with Honadiman- McCain, Inc., contractor for • Assessment District 82 -1, to deposit monies retained on the subject project in the contractor's bank account. h. Approval that design services for sidewalk construction on Ease Line between Hellman Avenue and Alta Loma High School be awarded to Derbish, Guerra 5 Assoc., the lowest bidder, for the amount of $4,100.00. i. Acceptance of Agreement, Security, and Final Map for Tract 10045 submitted by Westland Venture Company located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Hidden Farm Road. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 10045. j. Approval of release of Time Certificate of Deposit for 8968 Archibald (Willow School) in the amount of $3,450.00 to Diversified Investment Developers, approval of street improvements, and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS • FOR 8968 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (WILLOW SCHOOL) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. • k. Release of Bond for Site Approval 79 -10, located at 9900 Arrow Route, to the Church of the Nazarene. Pass Book (labor & materials) $3,250.00 1. Release of Bond for Site Approval 79 -19, located on the southeast corner of Foothill and Malachite, to ARCO Petroleum Products Co. Faithful Performance $6,300.00 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUDLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR S.A. 79 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. M. Set public hearing date of February 16, 1983 for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -04 - SALVATI. A change of zone from M -1 (limited manufacturing) to R -3 /PD (multiple family /planned development) and the development of 248 condominiums on 11.35 acres located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Grove Avenue - APN 207- 251 -02, 03, 13• n. Set public hearing date of February 16, 1983 for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT • AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -o4 - MIMMACK. A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R -1 (single family residential) for 5 acres of land located on the east side of Beryl Street, 1000 feet south of 19th Street - APt1 202- 041 -15. o. Acceptance of public improvements for Sapphire Street from Jenrette to Vinmar, and authorize the city engineer to file a Notice of Completion. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR SAPPHIRE STREET IMPROVF'"5NIS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMP'..°^':^" ° THE WORE; Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar with the deletion of item "f ". Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikeis LACES: None ABSTAINED: Frost on item 111" since he felt it was a bad project. Discussion of item "f ": Mr. Buquet asked why the leases were being extended only until June 1984. Mr. Wasserman explained we are now having them all the leases expire at the same time. We are leaving our options open for the future. There may be facilities available at that time which would be more suitable for city use. A question was raised regarding a rumor that the City was offered space at the Exchange. Mr. 'Wasserman stated an offer had been made to the City. However, we are now paying 56 cents per square fact. They wanted 80 cents per • square foot at the Exchange. The cost of relocating the phones alone would cost approximately $10- 15,000, and we would also be responsible for all the i mpravements. Although there would be more room and more parking space, the cost was prohibitive. Motion for item "f ": Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve the agreements to extend the City Office Complex lease agreements through June 30, 1934. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC FHi iws A. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM MOBILE HOME COACH OWNERS TO IMPOSE A RENT MORATORIUM. Staff report by Jim Robinson, assistant city manager. A request from the mobile home coach owners to impose a rent moratorium until the City's existing ordinance can be modified to provide binding arbitration. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. *Jack Emerson, Chaparral Heights, asked two questions: (1) why an SIR was not required in June 1981 when Ordinance 148 was adopted, and (2) what would the cost be for altering the ordinance to require binding arbitration? Nr 3ucuet answered the first question by stating the ordinance was strictly an • advisory process, therefore no strict binding resulted and would not be subject to an EIR. Mayor Mikels answered question two by stating we would have to know what types of changes were being proposed before we would know the costs and if an SIR were required. Mr. Emerson asked who determines whether an SIR is necessary? Mr. Dougherty responded that staff makes an initial .study based upon the proposal to ,.antify a,,,y V L• adverse anvironment impacts. Once this is made, it is referred to City Council who would have the ultimate responsibility to determine whether an SIR would be required. Generally speaking courts have leaned toward requiring EIRS in those cases where doubt exists. If a law suit resulted, then the courts would determine whether an EIR was necessary. Mr. Dougherty further stated that when the first mediation ordinance was initiated, we did not consider whether an EIR should be done. It is his opinion that any time you impose a mandatory control, then an EIR should warrant serious consideration and probably would be required. *Sam Rodda, The Pines, asked why is Rancho Cucamonga so forceful on doing an EIR since there are thirty -two communities with rent control ordinances and only one City in which an EIR was required, *Max Grossman, Alta Laguna, asked why did Council have to go over all this • again since they had looked at all the documents before. • Mayor Mikels explained they were going over this because the mobile home owners have requested it. *John Williams, Ramona Villa, asked why did the Rancho Cucamonga Council seem so hung up on doing an EIR since most of the other cities did not need it. Mayor Mikels stated that the EIR was only a small part of the larger process. He stated there were other items such as cost, deterioration of parks, etc. which must also be considered. Mr. Frost stated we were getting hung up on a response to a specific question that Mr. Emerson asked regarding the EIR. In his opinion the Council can follow the attorney's advice or not; it is only an opinion. Usually they did follow his advice. We are here at a specific request of the coach owners. *Ed Badka, Alta Laguna, responded to a statement that the parks would deteriorate. He stated the parks had not deteriorated. The people took pride in the parks and kept the coaches and surrounding areas up. *Mrs. Grossman, Alta Laguna, wanted the City to help them. *Vern Maxie, Senior Affairs Commission, felt the cart has been placed before the horse. The people were here for a rent moratorium. The • environment was mentioned in Mr. Robinson's report. Then Mr. Dougherty came back and referred to the environmental. He thought you had to pass the moratorium first. Then it goes to staff and back to Council with a recommendation if an environmental was necessary. He asked if that was correct? Mr. Dougherty stated the EIR would have to proceed an action such as an adoption of a moratorium. *Mr. Rodda asked if we had to have an EIR on the building moratorium which was enacted after incorporation. If not, then why must there be one for them. Mr. Frost responded that the building moratorium was placed at a time when we were transferring records and hiring initial staff. It was a process to stop everything so we could look at the records and to get organized. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearin;. Mr. Buquet stated that when they previously considered the matter whether to enact an ordinance or not, one of the alternatives was to revise the present ordinance to include binding arbitration. The other option was to establish a moratorium. The Council disapproved both of those concepts. fie felt they were considering something which had been considered before. Mr. Dahl stated in the last four months there was one meet - and - confer session that was brought about that did not pertain to the Alta Laguna situation; it was a different park. The main problem in that park was not rent, but other items in the park that needed to be resolved. It was his opinion that an Mayor Mikels called a recess at 8:50 p.m, The meeting reconvened at 9:10 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present, B. CONSIDERATION OF STORM DRAIN FEE MODIFICATIONS Staff report by Lloyd • Hubby, city engineer. Recommendation: It is recommended the Drainage Fee be increased from $2,500 • ordinance which required a binding type of arbitration but not tied to rents after being handled through the mediation process with no satisfaction would be a possibility. He also stated at the committee meetings, the homeowners stated they wanted a minimum of three arbitrators to he present. He felt the cast should be borne by the party with the grievance. With these suggestions, he requested this be referred back to the Committee for further study on the EIR factor. Mr. Schlosser stated there wasn't any reason to change now since at the last meeting they agreed to stay with the present ordinance for one year. You had to consider many things such as the vacancy rates, the comparative rents of other 'West End parks, the damaging effects on new properties, the deterioration of the parks, reduction of the maintenance, the fact that the City will have to defend law suits, contested hearings, and the EIR. Motion: Moved by Schlosser to continue with the present ordinance for a one year period from this date. Motion died for a lack of a second. Mr. Frost stated he had had some discussiongs with the Chamber Manager and they touched upon some topics that the Executive Committee had started to discuss as far as the possibility of the City pursuing other options in regard for solutions to the problems through the form of 20 percent of RDA money being used or perhaps the city could help make it possible for some existing parks to convert to coach ownership. Mr. Buquet stated if its council's intend to send this back to the Committee, • fine; but we could not make a decision to enact a moratorium tonight. Mr. Dahl felt a decision should be made tonight; that it should either be sent back to the Committee for more study or to state we don't want to proceed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to continue under the present ordinance for a period of one year from today's date, February 2, 1983. Mr. Buquet stated he was afraid some in the audience were concerned about the lack of action. He could not support a moratorium process tonight, but he felt a positive action has to be taken for the community. He felt seeking alternatives would be more beneficial in the long run. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOIi ;: Frost ABSENT: None Mayor Mikels called a recess at 8:50 p.m, The meeting reconvened at 9:10 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present, B. CONSIDERATION OF STORM DRAIN FEE MODIFICATIONS Staff report by Lloyd • Hubby, city engineer. Recommendation: It is recommended the Drainage Fee be increased from $2,500 • per acre to $4,600 per acre in order to meet increased costs of revised Master Plan. Mayor Mike's opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: *Gordon Bandy, 8377 Wilson Court, asked what were we talking about: developed property or undeveloped property. Mayor Mikels responded we were talking about undeveloped property. *Doug Hone asked, isn't developed property, when it goes in for a building permit, required to pay drainage fees also? Hubbs stated that certain criteria (so many square feet of addition) has to take place before it does key in. There is a provision that once a certain percent or over a certain amount of square feet is reached then they would be charged for the entire developed parcel. *Harold Zenz, Deer Creek, spoke about the Deer Creek proposed development and their application of the ordinance to Deer Creek. Ninety percent of their drainage goes into Deer Creek. In the remaining 147 lots, the total fee will flow to the benefit of the entire community. They suggested that the ordinance stating that all of the properties in the city are presumed to be of equal flood hazard and fees apply equally be changed as follows: • in Section E -- regarding exceptions: "A modification of such fees as adopted may be made by the City Engineer when it is determined that these are large areas where drainage facilities are in place and where no volume is put into any city drains or streets. Such modifications shall not exceed 50 percent of the established fee." *Ralph Lewin stated he agreed with much of what Mr. Zenz said. The finding in the ordinance which reads, "the city council finds that drainage problems are approximately equal in magnitude in all areas of the city," should be studied and recommended that this be delayed until the BIA could look into this al_ cg wi:r. [.,eir study of all the fees. *Joe Dilorio, R. C. Land, gave some brief history when the fees were established, the basic concept was that new development must pay for itself. He suggested that perhaps it would be appropirate that fees should be n „tab Liahed by water shed area. If the city council desires to maintain the fee on a city -wide basis, then R.C. Land is basically in favor of the increase in the fee. But for a good reason for they are draining a good portion in Etiwanda at a cost in excess of $5,000 per acre. *Doug Hone felt a $60 mil lion problem deserves a good deal of documentation. He felt he could not make a decision tonight with the information before Council. They needed to differentiate between established channel areas and the unchanneled areas. *Art Bridge stated he was planning on building a house in the middle of a 20 acre parcel. This would be a tremendous fee and felt this inequity should he looked into. *Sam Angona suggested that we come up with the formula for the different types of properties and houses. He questioned whether Council has really looked into all possible solutions and suggested that perhaps there was not sufficient input. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 75 -8. ORDINANCE NO. 75 -8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 13.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE PLAN AND DRAINAGE FEES. 0 Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 75 -B and set second reading on April 6th. Mr. Frost stated this will give Council two months to work on this. Mr. Wasserman pointed out an error on page 61 of the Agenda. It should read, "tentative map" instead of final map. • Mr. Frost asked what. the impact would the change have? ;dr. Dougherty stated the conditions are imposed at the time of a tentative map aproval. The final map, by recent court decision, is considered a ministerial act and a final map must be approved if all the conditions of a previously approved tentative map have been met. ' Mr. Lam stated that all fees have been collected at the time of building permit. Mr. Dahl expressed concern regarding tine breakdown of the fees. He opposed the $550 fee, classified as a regional fee, and would like to see this removed. Mr. Buquet stated he would like to see second reading set for sometime in March. Mr. Lam stated there are quite a few projects that could pull within thirty days. Whether they do, we don't know. Motion: Moved by Frost to revise the motion to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 75 -8 and set second reading to March 2. Motion died for lack of second. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to eliminate the $550 regional fee, • Section 13.08.040 from the Ordinance, waive full reading of Ordinance No. 75- 3, and set second reading for March 2, 1983. • Council discussed the $550 regional fee. Mr. Butts stated that most of the remaining regional facilities that are required are Day, Etiwanda, San Sevine which are or. the eastern half of the City. That fee was not intended to construct all of those drains, but to provide a certain amount of money to assist in the development along with other financial mechanisms to build Day, Etiwanda, and San Sevine. Mr. Dougherty stated this is the first this subject has been highlighted. He would like to do some more investigation and felt this should be removed and brought back on its own merit at a later time. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOES: Frost ASSENT: None Mr. Dougherty stated the motion was not unanimous, therefore a full reading of the ordinance was required. He suggested that Council should split the motions. The motion was withdrawn by the mover and seconder. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to amend the language in Ordinance 75 -3 to reflect the elimination of the regional fee, changing the fee from $46.00 to $40.50 per 1/100 acre. Motion carried by the following vote: . AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOES: Frost ABSENT: None Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 75 -B and to set second reading for March 2. Motion carried unanimously 5- 0. C, APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 7215 - MIl41ACH. Staff report by Uoyd Hubbs, city engineer. Mr. Hubbs pointed out there were two points which were being appealed: (1) Condition 7 which requires interior street improvement at the time of development of the vacant land. (2) Condition 8 which requires additional improvement to Eastwood Avenue. Currently, the street width is only 18 feet; the city requires half width streets to be 26 feet wide. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: *Gary and Ann Burt, 6875 Beryl Street, asked how the city would handle this when the two properties put in the improvements. Would the city come and require the $2500 to put in the improvements or would an assessment be arranged to give an opportunity to pay over ten years. Mr. Hubbs responded that when the others proceeded with their improvements, he would be put or• notice to go ahead and install the improvements concurrent with the others. There would be no financing by the City. *Mr. Hurt stated he would have to continue with the appeal then. He . stated their original intent was to split the lot so they could buy the house and separate it from the property in the back. *Chief Feuerstein stated he had looked at the area. It is a narrow street, but he could not say that it was a hazard. His only comment was that in areas where this situation arises, these types of problems should be corrected as soon as possible. At what stage this should be done, could be debated. The Uniform Fire Code states all access streets should be a minimum of 24 feet. Mr. Lam stated in terms of policy, we are dealing with two major ordinances in regard to improvements in the city. (1) the Subdivision Map Act and (2) an ordinance which requires that on a piece of property in which there is a subdivision being considered where there already exists a structure, then the improvements are necessary. The difference between the two is that any discretion for postponement would be under the latter ordinance. Council can make that discretion. The issue is postponement of these improvements, not waiver of improvements. There being no further comments, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Mr. Dahl stated regarding Beryl Avenue, we have already set a precedence in the past. The policy in the past has been that at the time the other street improvements are made along Beryl then the applicant would be responsible to put in his. Therefore, staff recommendation for Condition 8 would be • applicable. On Parcel 4 this has some precedence -- the Kortpeter project. The improvements would be made at time of development of a site plan. This should be handled through a lien. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to retain condition 7, retain that portion of condition 8 with respect to Beryl, and modify the portion of condition 8 in reference to Eastwood to defer installation of improvements until tome of development of site plan on parcel 4. Mr. Frost stated he had problems with Eastwood. He felt if we have an opportunity, we should correct it. He wanted to split the motions. Mr. Buquet stated he was not comfortaoie leaving this to a future time. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Schlosser, -rust, Mikels HOES: Buquet ABSENT: None D. VACATION OF SERVICE ROAD - PARCEL MAP 6114. It is requested that the public hearing for the vacation of the service road located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard in connection with Parcel Map 6114 be continued to March 16, 1983 in order to allow developer to clear up some paper work and to have • this recorded. • Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve continuance to March 12, 1983. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5• CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS There were none presented. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS There were none presented. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Mayor Mikels stated the Council would adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss pending litigation. b. Mr. Buquet wanted to get a subcommittee together to look at the total fee structure. Mr. Wasserman said staff was working on it and would welcome • anyone to sit down with them. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to appoint the Finance Committee (Schlosser and Buquet) to act as the subcommittee to work with staff on the fees. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. c. Mr. Buquet stated council should look into closing the parking lot at Vineyard Park during school hours; or limiting the parking to one hour. Council directed staff to place this on the next Agenda for council consideration. 8. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn to an Executive Session not to reconvene this evening, but to reconvene on Monday, February 7 at 7:30 p.m. for the Terra Vista public hearing. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk 9 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1983 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Response to Lewis Co. Letter �O GUG�.Nglc9 Z 19.Z In response to the letter from the Lewis Co. dated February 24, 1983 relating to the minutes of the Terra Vista hearing, I went through the tape recording of the sections in question. Question 1. -- I feel that section is quite clear. Question 2. -- Ms. Matlock was correct. She did give reasons for granting park credit for open space. I have inserted this in the text of the minutes. She did not mention, however, that both State law and City ordinance provided for such credit at this point. Question 3• -- Mr. Lewis did not present his comments as Ms. Matlock has written. What has been put into the minutes more accurately reflects what Mr. Lewis said at that point. Question 4. -- Mr. Lewis made no comment about disagreeing with Council at this point. Please note that on page 4, seven paragraphs from the bottom of the page that Mr. Lewis did comment that he agreed with their own counsel, etc. I have written the text out verbatim. I can provide this upon request. However, I did not feel that anything left out was pertinent to the overall action of the minutes. Please let me know if you have any questions. • 4�) LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. 1156 North Mountain aenue i PO Boa 670; Upland, [A 91786 71a 585 N71 February 24, 1983 City Council City of Rancno Cucamonga 9320 -Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: March 2 Agenda - Approval of February 7 Minutes Gentl e�.nen: ke respectfully request that four corrections he made to the minutes of the February 7, 1933 adjourned meeting on the Terra Vista Planned Community, This request is based on a comparison of the draft minutes with our own notes of the meeting. 1. On page 1, the second paragraph regarding dike Vairin's comments is a little confusing. The confusion could be remedied if the underlined • sentence is inserted: "According to the projected population by the applicant of Terra Vista, there were 55.3 acres which could be required. The proposed plan includes 42.5 acres of up blic parks and open space. This is 13 acres ess than the maximum that could be required under the Foran bill." At the top of page 2, my own comments at the beginning of the hearing included several other points besides the total amount of open space in the community. The minutes would be correct if the following were inserted regarding my statement: "Miss Matlock stated that the park plan had gone through many changes during public hearings by the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the plan in its present form. She further said that there were many reasons for granting park credit for private open space, among then Chat it meets recreational needs, it is a good substitute for public facilities, it reduces the demand on public facilities, and it augments rather than depletes City resources. She also said that both State law and City ordinance provide for such credit," 3. On page 3, Ralph Lewis's statement ( "Ralph Lewis stated he had had extensive discussions with staff. . . . ") is not reflected quite isaccura to ly. We request the following corrections. C Ay Council, City of Rancho Cucamonga February 24, 1983 Page 2 "Ralph Lewis stated that he had had extensive discussions with • staff and with the Planning Commission and felt agreement was reached on credit for private open space. He felt the Commission knew what it was doing when they recommended approval of the Plan. gn page Vi-4 was hew the ered#t for private epee spaee weeid werk. FiFigure VI -1 in the Plan showed exactly what kinds of u13 facilities wo-receive credit, and this example was a rp oject ' in Rancho Cucamon a with which the Planning Commissioners were familiar. He fe t that they have made substantial concessions since they have come from 69 aeres to 49 aepes over 50 acres to 13 acres which is 23 percent credit for private open space they expect to build. Mr. Lewis also stated that he felt the Council had previously encouraged rip va to open space and that their ordinance reflected this." 4. Finally, at the bottom of page 7, the record of Ralph Lewis's comments is not quite accurate and we request the following change: "Mr. Lewis stated they were 54mp3y anxaees to get started that he did not agree with the Council's action on parks but that he was anxious to get started with— dopment." We ask that you incorporate these changes before the minutes are approved. Very truly yours, • Kav Matlock Pro.iect Manager KIl:sas:202lr • 0 February 7, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held on February 7, 1983 in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; Senior Planner, Michael Vairin; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Absent: Councilman Phillip D. Schlosser. Mr. Schlosser arrived later in the evening. • Mayor Mikels stated that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss one item, the Terra Vista Planned Community. Xr. Lam stated the Council has received all the previous Planning Commission minutes including excerpts from the last meeting. They have also received the Plan itself and the Environmental Impact Report. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner and key staff member assigned to the Project, presented the staff report. Mr. Vairin reviewed the five major areas which the Planning Commission dealt with over the past year. They were: (1) Density, (2) Commercial Land Use, (3) Foothill Boulevard Design Concept, (4) Greenway, (5) Parks and Open Space. Regarding the Parks and Open Space, the original Plan which consisted of approximately 83 acres, with parks, open spaces, and trails has now been reduced to 42.6 acres. Much of this was due to the passage of the Foran Bill which limited cities in requiring no more than 3 acres of park land per 1000 population. According to the projected population of Terra Vista by the applicant, there were 55.8 acres which could be required. This is 13 acres less than the minimum that could be required under the Foran Bill. The applicant's intent was to reserve the 13 acres for potential private open space credit. Within the Foran Bill and our own Ordinance No. 105, there is the ability to grant private open space credit toward a public park requirement. Mayor Mikels called a recess at 7:50 p.m. before the slide presentation of the Terra 'Vista Plan was made in order that Councilman Phillip Schlosser might see the presentation. Councilman Schlosser arrived at 7:55 p.m. Mayor Mikels called the meeting back to order at 8:00 p.m. All members of the Council and staff were present. Mayor A:i;<els opened the meeting to the Lewises for their presentation. • A slide presentation was given by Gruen Associates, planning consultants for the Terra Vista project. Following the slide presentation, Kay Matlock commented on the Park Plan. She stated that they felt it was not correct to say that the Plan offers only the bare minimum of open space required by Ordinance No. 105 and the Foran Bill. They felt they were providing considerable amount of private open space in the community for which they are not anticipating any credit. During the Planning Commission hearings, they had estimated private open space in Terra Vista at an excess of 50 acres. When bringing the Plan back to the Planning Commission, they asked for credit for only 13 of those acres even though previously the Planning Commission had agreed all 53 acres were deserving of park credit. They felt if you take all the private open space plus the public open space, they were doing more than the minimum. Miss Matlock further stated some of the reasons for giving park credit for private open space: (1) its a substitute for the facilities it replaces, (2) it reduces demand on city facilities, (3) reduces ongoing maintenance costs to the city, (4) serves recreational needs of the people for whom it was provided, (5) aguments rather than drains city funds. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments on the Plan. Addressing Council were: • pill Owner asked how the Terra Vista Plan would integrate with the present development to the east, known as the Rochester tract. Mayor Mikels gave the applicant time to respond to the question. Kay Matlock stated that they have taken this into consideration and have provided trail connections from Terra Vista to the Rochester tract. There are street connections and the junior high will also serve as a connecting point. As far as a general merging together, this is difficult since Rochester will ultimately be a major arterial with four lanes with a left turn lane in the middle. Most of the development next to the tract will be lower in density. Sharon Romero stated she had concerns with a park next to a junior high, and with parks being used temporarily as drains when it rains — especially those next to elementary schools. She also expressed concern with 30 foot wide parkways since those in the slides looked wider. She felt this might be too wide in some places and perhaps too narrow in others; this was hard to visualize. Concerning Foothill she expressed that she hoped the view of the mountains would not be obstructed. There being no further public comments, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Mayor Mikeis asked if there were any discussion of the proposed treatment of • parks within the Plan itself. City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 • Page 3 Mr. 'Frost asked about the dialogue which had occurred with the school districts as to the school sites in the Plan. Kay Matlock stated that when the Park Plan was revised, the Etiwanda School District requested that their school sites be 9 acres adjoining a 3 acre park. Tiie Central School District appears they are tending to favor sites between 7- 9 acres in size. In the Terra Vista Plan all elementary school sites are shown as 9 acres. Mr. Frost stated that they probably don't own the land. He asked 'what they anticipated the Schools' ability would be to purchase land in the future. Kay Matlock stated the first development will be within the Central School District. They expect building will be taking off this year. They think that the Central District will be able to qualify for assistance from the State under the Green Program. If not, they will consider various bond possibilities made possible through laws passed from the last session. They have been working with Central District on the payment of school fees, what they might do with them, when they might do them. They have worked out how many students will be coming on line, how soon, and where they will go. Central District is developing an instant school site near Vineyard. She stated they could not commit School Boards to the sites, but they have worked closely with the Superintendents and they seem pleased with the sites. • Mr. Buquet stated that he did not expect the developer to give in excess, but ::e would like to see a compromise between what was presented in the slides and what is in front of the Council. He stated one of his concerns was the allocation of the allowance of the private open space. The private open space is not really shown on the Plan. It makes it difficult to talk about something you don't see. He felt this should be discussed before proceeding on the Parks issue itself. Mayor Mikels stated that Mr. Buquet was suggesting that Council address the credit for private open space now as part of this issue. Ralph Lewis stated he had had extensive discussions with staff and with the Planning Commission. He felt the Commission knew what it was doing when they recommended adoption of the whole Plan. On page VI -1 explains how the credit toward park requirement would work. They took an existing project which they had built in the City and showed the portion of it that they thought would qualify for open space credit if they built it in Terra Vista. They went through this extensively with staff, and he thought they were in agreement with staff. it resulted in substantial amount of private open space credit. The. Commission suggested they cut the credit down, and they agreed to it. It went from 60 acres to 40 acres. With private open space credit, that would be 23 percent. He thought that was a substantial concession which they made. Mr. Lewis further stated there was a prior council policy to encourage private open spew: and recreational amenities. Although not all were on the Council then, a desire was expressed to encourage private open space by giving credit Is for it. Mr. Dahl stated it was extremely difficult to obtain park land. He felt we owed it to the residents of Rancho Cucamonga to make sure that parks are City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 Page 4 • ,.!:ore. He was concerned about the loss of the 13 acres and wanted to see this put into parks. He stated it does not matter whether the parks are developed by Lewis or by the City. Mr. Lewis stated that comments have been made as to when they are to get credit for private open space. He felt it would not matter when they got the credit. Whether they get it tonight or when they bring in each subdivision with private open space. Mr. Lam stated we are setting the parameters of the open space system, but the precise details will have to come back in terms of the implementation of the Plan. Gary Brown, of the Building Industry Association, read Government Code Section 66477. He expressed concern that Council was stating there was not a basis for credit for open space when the State Legislature states there is a basis and has mandated that a developer can receive credit for private open space. Mr. Frost stated because we are talking about the only portion of the Terra Vista that will fall under the jurisdiction of the City, it would seem that the Council should not allow credit for specific portions of the Plan which has not been seen by the City. Motion: Proved by Frost, seconded by Buquet that the City not allow credit for private open space within the Terra Vista Planned Community. When we have specific site plans, then they will be considered for potential private open • space credit. Discussion :allowed regarding the language of the motion. Mr. Buquet stated we need to make a decision now in order to be fair to the Lewises and to the City. Mr. Dougherty suggested the following change in the Terra Vista Plan on page VI -4, under the title, Provisions for Meeting Park Requirements. The second paragraph to be changed as follows: 100% credit for public parks, greenways, trails, and passes, not to total less than 55.8 acres of the total amount required. The third paragraph to be deleted entirely. The fourth paragraph to be changed as follows; Park requirements will be met through a combination of dedication of land, improvement of park facilities, and payment of fees. Delete the remaining part of the sentence. Delete the entire section entitled, Credit for Private Open Space. Mr. Lain suggested adding the phrase, "if additional units exceed 8,000, then additional public open space shall be required based upon the city's park dedication formula.,, Mr. Dahl suggested we should include in the motion that having reviewed the plan as submitted and found it consistent with state law and local ordinance, we find the 55.8 acres of park land required is deficient by 13 acres and must be ;shown. Further it is felt in the best public interest the additional 13 • acres r,hculd be vested in public trust. Mayor Mikels asked if the mover wanted to make some changes with the motion. City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 • Page 5 Mr. Frost stated the intent of his motion was not to allow any credit -for private open space since we don't know what we are buying. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Buquet to make the following changes on page 'VI -4 of the Terra Vista Plan text: "Provisions for Meeting Park Requirements The park dedication requirements of the City pursuant to �B 1785 will be met by residential developments within Terra Vista through a combination of the following: *100$ credit for public parks, greenways, trails, and paseos, not to total less than 55.8 acres of the toal amount required. i6redik For appreppiake open space and reereakien €aeilit4eei ae presided eeiew. (Delete section). Park requirements will be met through a combination of dedication of land, improvement of park facilities, and fees. and ppeviaten of eredated private epee epaeet an diaeweeed "'OWv (Delete from text). Credit for Private Open Space (Delete entire section from text)." • Mr. Wasserman stated before the second reading, we will go through the document and list all the inconsistencies. Mr. A ekel, legal counsel for Lewis Development, stated for the record that he dcesn't agree that Council can preclude them from any private open space credit against the park dedication requirements under the Foran Sill. Bob Dougherty stated it may come to a point where a court will determine what we can or cannot do in regard to credit for private open space. The City's position is that private open space is an option which the City has to consider but is not required to grant. Mayor Mikels asked if there xerz any _._W the applicant. Mr. Lewis stated he agreed with their own counsel, and felt they should have credit as they brought in each development. Re felt this flies in the face of the Foran 9'11, Motion: Carried by the following vote: Byes; Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels Noes: Schlosser Mayor Mikels called a recess at 10:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:28 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present. Mayor Mikels stated the Council had not concluded the discussion on parks since there was still the 13 acres to be considered. City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 Page 6 Councilman Dahl stated he would like to see a portion of that 13.2 acres_ be . put into the area designated as the City Park. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl that the 13.2 acres be applied to the Park area adjacent to the Deer Creek, north of Base Line. Mr. Frost stated he did not disagree with the intent, but he felt this should be discussed after the other items. He felt there may be other changes to the Plan. Kay Matlock stated they have reviewed with their planning consultants, Gruen Associates, what they would do with another 13 acres if it were to be included in the Plan. There were places they would propose to put it -- part of it in the greenway, part in the parks system at the east end and west end of the project. The acreage under discussion is provided by the Quimby Act dedications which by law are to serve the residents of the subdivision from which the dedication is paid. She felt it was not proper to provide a city- wide park with Quimby Act dedications when there is an alternative that would better serve the residents of those subdivisions. Mr. Dahl stated it was his opinion that the area in which they were placing the 13 acres was adjacent to a section of the Terra Vista Plan to the north and to the areas to the south which would be in close proximity to the Park Plan. Tt would serve the needs of the people in that area and would be conducive to the Terra Vista Plan. • Lewis felt the Council should read Ordinance No. 105 which states the land sho:ild be used only for parks or recreational facilities which serve residents of such subdivision as opposed to a city -wide park. Mr. Dougherty stated the key to the Quimby Act and Foran Bill talks in terms of neighborhood and community park areas. Neighborhood would be localized while community would serve a larger segment and not necessarily the particular subdivision. The Ordinance talks about reasonably served which does not mean exclusively served. A park in that location might reasonably serve the future residents of T. . _ as well as other residents of the City as would the interior parl:z w..__.. _. _,-n to .ne public as well. Kay Matlock stated that if a park in that area did reasonbly serve Terra Vista, then certainly not all 13 of the acres. Motion: Carried by the following vote: Ayes: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels Noes: Schlosser Mr. Schlosser stated that he felt the developers should have a choice in the matter. Council went over the other items as follows: 1. Or3anization of text and use of graphics. City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 Page 7 • Action: No action was taken by Council; approved as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Residential Density. Mr. Dahl wanted to go on record that he felt the triangular area along Haven was not addressed as well as it should be. The area along the railroad shown as low- medium designation was an improper designation for that area. Also the designation of Base Line and Haven in the southeast portion would have been better treated as a mirror to the Plan and entrance to the entire project with a low- medium designation. This would be a better designation for the whole area. Mr. Buquet stated that the low- medium designation should be swapped with the middle and would be a better corner use and buffer for the residential area across the street. Elaine Carbrey, of Gruen Associates, stated the low- medium next to the railroad was designated because there are single family housing on the opposite side of the railroad tracts. It was felt they should keep the lower density adjacent to those single family housing parcels that are at major intersections. They felt that if they designated a housing type that could be clustered, they would be able to mitigate any noise effects and also be able • to create more green space at those major intersections rather than putting single family there. Council continued with a lengthy discussion regarding the densities at Base Line and Haven and Base Line and Rochester. Mr. Lewis stated Base Line and Haven; Base Line and Rochester; and Base Line and Milliken are going to be very heavy traffic corners. They have found it very hard to sell single family homes at busy intersections. Questions were raised about the railroad tracks and the noise associated with them, and the number of trains which ran during the day. Kay Matlock responded they had investigated this and currently there are only six trains a week running on the track. Joe DiIorio stated that the railroad was used basically for the lumber yard, but they were not using it lately. Motion; Moved by Dahl that the designation be changed to medium designation in terms of a buffer and the low- medium be looked at. Mayor Mikels stated in other words to flip flop the designations. Mr. Dahl stated basicall; that would be fine. The motion died for lack of a second. Motion: Moved by Dahl to change all the designations within the trapizoid bounded by the railroad, Deer Creek, Base Line and Haven to medium density without modifying the total number of units in the Plan. Motion died for a 49 lack of second. Motion: Moved by Frost to make a reverse "C" in that same area so that the low- medium would be through the center with medium density surrounding it. City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 Page 8 Motion died for lack of a second. Action: The Plan remained as recommended by the Planning Commission. 3. Residential Design Guidelines. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost that the intersection of Base Line and Haven have a special boulevard designation placed in the text granting that intersection special treatment in respect to set backs and types of landscaping. Jeff Skorneck, Gruen Associates, stated that on page IV -3 of the Plan this issue was addressed. Both Mr. Dahl and Mr. Frost withdrew their motion since this was addressed. Mr. Frost suggested some new wording to be added the the second paragraph on page V -1 of the Terra Vista Plan text as follows: r� LJ "The development standards should be used in combination With the design guidelines, which, although they are flexible guidelines rather than strict regulations, are also intended to shape development within the Terra Vista Planned Community. 'These guidelines are intended to provide a variety of residential designs to create variable lot sizes, slopes, and • building orientations within each neighborhood." (Added text emphasized). Discussion followed regarding this added language. Action: No action was taken by Council; remained as recommended by the Planning Commission. 4. Commercial Lard Use. Mr. Dahl stated that the corner of Base Line and Haven is the best location for a neighborhood shopping center. Mr. Buquet stated there would be very strong opposition from the residents if we designate the northeast corner as a shopping center unless we designated a green spot on the southeast site. Mr. Lewis stated they would withdraw their request for park credit for a small park on the southeast corner of Base Line and Haven. Kay Matlock stated they would need to get with Gruen to make the suggested changes as recommended by Council. They knew the intent and could bring somthinu' back at the next meeting. Mayor Mikels asked how big should the park area be. Discussion followed with Council deciding on a 10,000 square foot park area on the southeast corner, Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve a neighborhood • commercial designation on the northeast corner of Base Line and Haven, and to designate the creation of a 10,000 square foot park area on the southeast City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 Page 9 • corner and that no park credit be given, and the neighborhood - commercial designation be eliminated at the intersection of Spruce Street and Terra Vista Parkway. Mr. Lewis stated this Would be acceptable. Motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels. Noes: None. 5. Foothill Boulevard Design Concept. Action: No action was taken by Council; approved as presented by the Planning Commission. 6. Greenway Design Concept. Action: No action was taken by Council; approved as presented by the Planning Commission. 7. Park Plan. Item was discussed first at the beginning of the hearing. 8. Landscape Guidelines. • Action: No action was taken by Council; approved as presented by the Planning Commission. Mayor Mikeln asked if there were any necessary changes to the text required. Council had no comments. Mayor Mikels gave Mr. Lewis an opportunity to respond to the changes made by the Planning Commission. Mr. Lewis stated they had expressed their views. They were pleased it was drawing to a head. They were very anxious to get started. There being no further comments, Mayor Mikels asked the city clerk to read the title of the Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 190 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APP.. ^.OVING PLANNED COMMUNTIY ZONE NO. 81 -01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN BASE LINE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND BETWEEN ROCHESTER AND HAVEN ON THE EAST AND WEST, Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of the amended Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels set the second reading for February 16, 1983 subject to availablity of review to the Plan with materials to be delivered to Council on Monday, February 14th. If materials are not received in time, then an City Council Minutes February 7, 1983 Page 10 adjourned meeting will be set. • 3• ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to adjourn the meeting to a special joint meeting with the Planning Commission on Thursday, February 10, 1983 at the Magic Lamp at 6:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting acjourned at 12:20 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk • P • February 10, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned joint meeting. with Planning Commission 1. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned, joint, dinner meeting of the City Council with the Planning Commission was held at the Magic Lamp, 8189 Foothill Boulevard, on Thursday, February 10, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 6:40 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikeis and Chairman Jeff King. Present were City Council members: Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Planning Commission members: Herman Rempel, Larry MoNiel, David Barker, Dennis Stout, and Chairman Jeff King. II. CONSIDERATION OF AGENDA ITEM • 1. Discussion of City Policies regarding density issues in areas adiacent to single family residences. The concern was regarding the impact of higher density on established neighborhoods. It was the consensus of both groups that this should be studied prior to approval of any projects by staff or planning commission. In some instances design may mitigate some concerns of adjacent homeowners. 2. Discussion regarding feasibility of narrowing general plan density ranges. It was the consensus of the Commission and Council that the primary problem with the General Plan density ranges is that they are quite broad. This is particularly true in the multiple density ranges of four to fourteen units per acre oral fourteen to twenty -four units per acre. When the Commission ado, o Development Code, this issue will be dealt with. In addition, consideration may be given to handling the broad ranges of density in the same manner as they are handled in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. This will provide overlapping zoning designations or incentives for outstanding development projects. 3. Discussion of Design Review Process. Following discussion concerning the advantages and disadvantages of the present Design Review process, the matter will be considered by a subcommittee consisting of Councilman Dahl and Councilman Frost. It was the concensus of both the Planning Commission and City Council that it may be desirable to involve as many Planning Commissioners as possible in the Design Review process. 4. Discussion of Foothill Community Plan - Annexation. It was the concensus of the Planning Commission and City Council that the advantages and disadvantages of annexation of the area within the City's sphere of influence should be evaluated by the staff. Because of the potential 5 6. 7 impact upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga, this evaluation is to include • identification of both service and fiscal impacts with or without annexation. A phased program of annexation may be desirable. community development director indicated that the Development Code will be presented to the Commission in the near future. The Development Code will include zoning considerations as well as establishing standards for design and development. development review. It was the consensus that the Design Review Process provides ample opportunity for the Planning Commission to assure that quality development is achieved. respective roles of the Planning Commission, Citizens Commission, and Parks Committee. 8. Windrow Preservation. Councilman Buquet indicated that his concern over windrow preservation is that the City formulate a policy to serve as a guideline for future development. It was the consensus of both the Planning Commission and the City Council that existing windrows need to . be replaced with a better species of tree. Both the Planning Commission and City Council reaffirmed support for retaining windrows as an unique feture, particularly in the community of Etiwanda. III. ADJOURNMUT Motion: Moved by Schlossr, sconded by Buquet -- Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout -- to adjourn the meeting. Motions carried unanimously by both Council and Commission. Respectfully submitted. Lauren M. Wasserman City Clerk • RR +i .:ITV \M rl'n frlC a °•;VfA M nPR 4 VE V E N D C R N A M F 11172 1145 IPC ^PVIf ES ICf If'..3 1"e5 rfljI 7101 11 1'. ^T'PC 11'•]4 Cl?, Ar T 1.'! P"VII nGl "CY Ind)5 K11` :.l Flln l Ffl:fe el S.1VV'1. 1n171 , '+ ?Aglrlr CF. M r >1 1 ^Ill l "'IfiS 11Pr S "I'vir+ 111-71, FF^. eu`rN L(NF Ff^.P(PS)19': In179 •� "Il II, IA IIYVI.r 1 nI•n IILfS I01n1 1)]5 ^ nUrl, nyvlrS 111114 c. ^. U11-1 Au4.q • 'u fT1FL 411- 1 "1q, -. -, 1l ,l \n 7r, IN, FY v FPJI I.l1 ul r1 t1` CnA -,,r f i r 1! 12•.1111 1`s -rt,r f' � +FPm tr• 1 rv."y 11,. rl.f n.�a•;n .ol rr 1041 fl ^1 1-:1111 711 AVrl ACr •:rY 104 - 7115 °II <c. VGA ✓f'I In<no 4'nn rurT. PIf1 Snu:j fr15 tlU I N. C• `a[+ Vr pR 1. Cr'NIS If1:r .. AP! YrPuf9 h`1 ^' 71 T1 1 I' A I`� 4149 r- p1H111 1 "n, 1 ^ °Pr •••lu l ?A I:1nn 1145 111.'4 C'11Sr TAY " 'uf In :1`l Cvn ou11 PFl IPf rF `:L $.. 4 ]'S+ SIf111'•1 All 1'1`14 c4i dCCI fI AT rr; rry..Arl +r'i 1'! Ir 71` r, Ir I r r -- r"' r inl� r ^. El.. LL 1CP p I 'IC 7'1[4 1 "'r r 1 ^1' H Ir P CF t(ry in"fl '1 ^n n rf tcrrl lrs 7.117 vF 1 T: 111 fV' 1.'111I rT Tl vA -PT 11y 1 +1111 +!., 711.1 rF Tn W'I S. Ir': 5111.: 1'11. 1.51.. 1'nM..,T 17, `n y..rn � l I r tl r -I-IN I lf" er <i 1111! lfre r 1 TI S4 ^411 A ^'` ^T \Rr Si:'Y lI'ry 17•`1. "In !• SI 1''. Pn9 17151 t "` '.5S r 11FV 0A'r 4: A P 71 , 17"4 1,' r q<1 EV FFAFriflr 171." IY ? w }nr•1`: C W f. YIf NA 17,5 17- ^'tF F)r Pr M(Al< t ]...n 112.. T't•n. S� 1[127! I T[rt 4! r1:'y I epa. Inn 41` l' ✓' fare^: I hel ?t`9 e r 1•.rjecrnl.'r 1 '11 ^rV II IF^P.IA Vi'Frr llr 1 1 1 is : 13 C4 +T.1A1 C LtISS 17.11. 211`3 fr11141 CI It IS <IS`: VP Iraq) 2111. f.r9Tlrlf:: ro A.'<..ICIFTV 1 1152 2))S f!I Arlrr HCI' -I[ S ^C I£iY I r•.'y 1,, CIAll YC lI °rS 1717^ i +'4 rIrA$TrjAFR CPF0. °A ^Y m n - s crrn , nn r1` rl a I^ 1111' 1172 v ^e ^v; N . 2"15 171`71 15]; rqf nyrlv.!'A 1`(n AT III p157 171]1 r� <S rr'I III, I FI ^:'!1 f^ 1 \C 111.71 11.414 C'11f 1 GPI•r I ": 17171 >1n1 vll l l4M CIITT'^::er Rr. I)<)! Ir.51 1`1 llv PrPrPT- MARRAN't RFffYCII N M 31161 fl3- DT F DIS[CUNT NET AE RIf2 CF 1 9O.SR 2.291.11 z Y2.. 45 z F.4.z9 148.50 z.7cC, CO 104,94 44.55 519.75 1.n r.9.ec 4.410.35 IS,CC RD.CC 413.29 es. oc 22.00 80 .Cf 8.61 2 .55- z.e9o.14 751.1} 115.55 313.5!; 3P0.06 E0.0C PA• I r ♦ 1 ♦ t ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ !, O 4 ( Q O I I Q O I Q Q 1 ♦ p 11867 CITY OF RANrHO CUCAMONGA PARR 9 YEN 9 V F N V C R II A M F 17F,7- ,,S, "N 17 'T' I o I r I I IC. r I 1 71 " —1 rlYt F 111:0% , Ir, ".. ^1.v I IV, 17-0 4 — ) IF r - r" P'PPLCTI I' I III.As I'll 1• --71 hIT 171, n., 7 1 . I 1 'II]Arl A,r IN, P., 1 7'N1, '4t I A-1— vt ',-. I. SVIS 17-1 1'; 11-1=1 III: near 1,r ?3�1 1 V J ILrr rr I lon. —1. 11.11 1 IF- il - IF 17"" , ' Ff n T i I .., I - , I IoIfv; I,, t —, I pr1., I. ,, , , , 17( 1.-- 11 1 .01-1. , 'IV 1� 1—, 41 P I I rP. A PAVTt'C. Y' F,nj I. r. S FY.PCI 41 00 'IF $ 11 11-1 fOlirF I Cr 1771 1 I'l I s: — 11 Pic" Il/nl 41(7' ; -A,II I I' I �y q IjfrI 411111 ol IT FYI Hltttlp I I ,, I I - " 'I I T IIn`IA, l 1FI1I C I rl", ';j. I oI y rrY C, 1,r I— `!I I — 1 171 % " IS� I.•I jn`.l' 17711 -14I" T--aF`nUrK LOO�F i,?"21 51 is ps,5--r- II. .9 7 1 CITY -,;IT ASSCE I'll, I") "It NrrT-TY 'F I 1 11, o,, I, IF ?It, V!I 111111111 1171+ C.P 1711, 7115 1 1 .11�1 7 115 1,1M17 KITI—, F`f-PIPT 177I5 �I I I Y1 IIT—�- r. 1-:Ni 1771 1 t. 1, " Is cmO.", v-4,I IF 17,jr 111.1 1111-11 111. " p "'fl, , cp 71!� 611, 1 1 -1 1�1� I 'In 1 `1 1, -111, ". t y 177 It ]t1•; ..1 -, " 1, �T"` Syl I"Fl. 1711, .... .. I., ,, -, 1-TIl'I An 171— 7119 "ILLS A.S'C. RICI•I-q 1712" 711 - It 1 1 7 111iRfN 17711 71 -11 cl FAR I.r.l,u Il�l III L11 1771 1 7- 1 111 1 771-j 711.1� I'll it if F7r.!]I)CTS I Fri, `� ✓1 1, 11ir if if Pf CK r. •F-AVEL c 11111 7 ?74 p, Q Sr-IAL CfwPUTINC, 1)71"` p,—I. r,,,, C, 1773j F14S PiNrF!i rISPFSAL 11`71% 1, Replq r,7A IZ,r I "-1 1117 ",-1, IT:" FF." IT71,11 --,'ITS IF III 1?737 2 � - 17 111 r' F v F I n A to FIT, A IF I'll, -11FI vIT, I . 'I,, 'I N I. I 1 77 In P - `11 J4,,'s 1, 1 1741 �1.1 11-:1111111-7 IIIIN. 1 171,11 -4" "1: F`Il� ?I F:45 a, 1Pq Nrp ISrPL'I;P T F-IX% 17141 i4I11 SI-1 :1.1 YN I-JCS -A Sp I I r4l S-pt, . FA 1 7714 1 Sr T F I,j.jy I ?14� F',I 0 S! VF- P.IY All 114ITS M17 v-7, V�� rf.p It�. n,jr, 1774- -11 -1 SIF T-11 IF II71SIII Cl 1 7 1... 1 0111 v- r It I I I, S 1111 171s, F I, 10 S- FIT IF I AI!qSr.AnF !IL VT I III P' 2-1 SI A TUNFOS 11.11^'• I , " I Irl"'Y TIT ij 31 WARRANT RECCNETLY67ICN RFR FAATC �IrVn NIF F Pr.% 161-1 1 11— 3116/03 OISCOUNT NET JSL 19 PACE 2 • - . • --- , • n O RMCT CITT PANCNO CUr AyON'A k R A M E VARRANT PCC�ICNCIL CY 3/16/03 OISCOUNI NET PI 3 1 Y,Rn, I V� V F 0 0 N (4TH Nf i�cl 17711 1171 S'9' I 1q+1• a /1!/ °3 40.00 17 a5b Y!P•:rT mIPIISMH•S ? /16 /vI 69.00 ' 1719: °4.`e a /l1/ ?9 84.15 9.00 1)'51 I R57 Vp :T cl°t -I- '-'Lf 1 -•' a:-' r. rr "' 150.01 1 ]7S^ 1� Vr ST F \9 I" 1'1 VAY a /lh / °i R1.50 l7•[" +11 ,ir Clril' :•"'fy r^ 56P.97 121,^ SIm ^ 342.40 17'11 4ILYLI. TP"•'S ' /If / °9 32.26 11'•.• 9 +" O]Lr'CC vATIF••Y rn 7 /1 /. /'•1 9 -.91 l 7.'N i lr lt"Sr•, r. Cnwl� ?/16/ +1 a/I 5,511 .4t 621.27 179,.4 17'x9 attt Z \"+R�1'7 P °. r v-ncc° r'1 "SIR+ r 1 V71 1 /Ic / ^7 5,000.c L' 11:1w oc Y'rr r'v OISn1S AI S "' /IrE 2 /Ih /R1 70.CC 17•:.7 v'1^ :114L 11TAL9 a /l6 /n3 FINAL iCT AlO 64T.709.32 i e a IN J r e e . e •r P r "li'a�L_' ": \�I ' ''•� ' k ,•' L6'11X A.4'S`tt•, l JOHN C. MADDUS r: I I -- _ CITY I)F "RAN6';0 CJ:; fdOnG,1 ADMIN1sTR„T;p , :',ififi 0 AIM P.4 718191 iG 1li 211; 2A415; cc', Z= February 28, 1983 TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ROY RATLIFF and DANNIE RATLIFF hereby make claim against the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the sum of $81,400 and ma'leo the following statements in support of the claim: 1. Claimants' post office address is 33455 Ramona Expressway, Lakeview, California 92353. . 2. Notice concerning the claim should be sent to John C. '!addax, Attorney at Law, 1131 :vest Sixth Street, Suite 220, Ontario, California 91762. 3 The date and place of the occurrence giving rise to this claim are the months of December, 1982, January, 1983, anr. February, 1983, at 9405 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows: During the recent rainfall of December, 1982, anr. January and February, 1983, extensive ':rater damage has occurred to the foundation, base ... Lot, structural integrity, sdi;wnJn,,j pool, various outbuildings, fences, and olectrical eq,iipment at Claimants' residential property located at 9405 Hallman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. T'ue above listed damages have occurred because the recently installed flood control channel is improperly designed and constructed and will not accommodate the volume of water generated by even moderate rainfall. Instead, the runoff water is funnolc :onto and through Claimant's property, cau'Sinq Oxtensive danlago. As part of the construction of the flood control q TO CITY OF RAi;CIIO CUCAMONGA February 28, 1983 -- Page Two charnel, the height of the roadbed of Hellman Avenue was raised and the grade of Hellman Avenue in the vicinity of Claimants' property was altered without compensating measures which greatly contributes to the path of water and resulting damages. Also, a drainage system was installed north of the property which contributed to the flow of water causing damages. All of the above was specifically brought to the attention. of City officials at the time of construction, to no avail. As the recent rainfall was the first significant rainfall since the completion of construction, the magnitude and significance of the problem has only now manifested itself. 5. Claimants' injuries are damage to the foundation, basement, structural integrity, swimming pool, various out - buildinas, fences, electrical equipment and general erosion to the property, structures, and improvements located at 9405 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, as well as loss of rental income due to the resulting unhabitability of said structure. G. The names of the public employees causing the cla ir'a r.ts' injuries are unknown. 7. my claim„ as of the data of this claim is $81,400. S. The basis of computation of the above amount is as follos;s: Damage to Property Loss of Rental income at $350 /mcnth. Total: Febru.,r •;: Febraar.y 28, 1983 4* 5 $80,000 1,400 $81,400 tip C. nuDDUx, ettorney at Law, on behalf of Claimants E • 0 • F OTm nV n ATlniin 07 TO nl.rnnrn A In accordance with the contract specifications and various Government and Public Contract Codes, it has been determined that the original contractor, Red Hill Construction Co., for subject project has abandoned the project. Therefore, in accordance with said specifications and codes, the contractor's control over the work has been terminated. Also, in accordance with said specifications and codes, informal bids have been solicited and received (proposal summary attached) for the completion of the project. Of the six bids received, the apparent low bid is 8255,054,40 submitted by Riverside Construction Co. Verbal approval of the proposed new contractor has been received from CalTrans. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve the alternative, under Section 10255 of the Public Contract Code, that the director (City Manager) may direct that all or any part of the work be completed by employment of other contractors on informal contracts. Further, that Council approve (concurrent with CalTrans approval) Riverside Construction Co. to complete, and execute agreement for the completion of all the work remaining on said project for the amount of $280,560.00 ($255,054.40 plus 10% contingency); and that Council authorize the Finance Director to pay Riverside Construction, in accordance with the agreement, that amount of the original contract from FAU funds and that amount above original contract from Systems Development funds and collect same amount above the original contract from the orignal surety. continued....... STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager ` 1q77 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Approve and Execute Informal Contract for the completion of Vineyard Avenue Street Improvements FAU M /MR- R194(2) In accordance with the contract specifications and various Government and Public Contract Codes, it has been determined that the original contractor, Red Hill Construction Co., for subject project has abandoned the project. Therefore, in accordance with said specifications and codes, the contractor's control over the work has been terminated. Also, in accordance with said specifications and codes, informal bids have been solicited and received (proposal summary attached) for the completion of the project. Of the six bids received, the apparent low bid is 8255,054,40 submitted by Riverside Construction Co. Verbal approval of the proposed new contractor has been received from CalTrans. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve the alternative, under Section 10255 of the Public Contract Code, that the director (City Manager) may direct that all or any part of the work be completed by employment of other contractors on informal contracts. Further, that Council approve (concurrent with CalTrans approval) Riverside Construction Co. to complete, and execute agreement for the completion of all the work remaining on said project for the amount of $280,560.00 ($255,054.40 plus 10% contingency); and that Council authorize the Finance Director to pay Riverside Construction, in accordance with the agreement, that amount of the original contract from FAU funds and that amount above original contract from Systems Development funds and collect same amount above the original contract from the orignal surety. continued....... City Council Staff Report Vineyard Avenue Street Improvements FAU M /MR- R194(2) March 16, 1983 Page 2 City Council approval of the above proposed contractor and execution of informal contract does not release the said original contractor or his surety of the responsibility of the completion of said project. The existing contracts and bonds will continue to be in effect and binding. The original contractor has only been relieved of his control over the work. Respe tfully subm' ted, i LBR P:jaa Attachments i • 40 ,,A, U � P9DJEC t: V, n. yard F.A !]. M7YR- µl94(2) 1.1E-4t10N: 'lineynrd Aven,ie between Stb and Arr Riverside Const. ITE: %S OOANT IT IES BID AMOUNT f Cle"I., S Gru6bin9 Lucy Sum 15,W0.00 ?. id..,y Eu a: a!mn -62d C.Y. 5.00 13,140,00 3 denave 3asse S SurfaCin7 5670 S.Y. 1.65 9,155.50 ' 4s plr It Cuecrete 3156 Tans 24,35 76,8.18.60 5 Aglre94te 'ease 113[ C.Y. 14.00 15,314.00 6 Place Only h" A.C. Dik^ 2116 L.F. 1.25 2,547.50 7 3- P.C.C. Curb d Patter 9.9 L.F- 8.00 7,592.OD 8 8" P.C.C. Curb Only 215 L.F. 4,40 945.00 9 P.0 C, Miac. Items 31 L.Y. 123,00 3,813.00 1014mor Concrete (Struct) ?2.5 C.Y. 500.00 10,750.00 It Mist, Irop S Steel 2910 lb. 1.15 3,352.00 12 15^ RCP Class it 1250;1 34 L.F. 40,00 1,360.00 13 15" RCP Class 111 15900 27 L,F. 40,00 1,030,00 11 11'• RCP Class 11 12500 31 L.F. 40.00 1,240,00 15 3U•' RCP Clr,s !1 12500 166 L.F. 46.00 7,636.00 16 Atjnat Manhole to Grade 7 Each 220,00 1,540.00 17 13 "222'• CSPA 16Ga. 50 L.F. 41.00 2,050.00 18 Type •T' Markers 19 Each 23.00 437.W 19 Traffic Signing Lump Sum 2,300.00 20 Traffic 5tripin9 Lump Sum 3,300.00 '•� 21 Metal Guard Rail 110 L.F. 38.00 4,130.00 22 Relocate Guard Rail 50 L.F. 15.50 715.00 23 Traffic Signal Lump Sum 66,411.60 24 8'• PVC Seh. 40 Pipe 310 L.F. 8,00 2,480.00 CITY aCMO CUCAMONGA - SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED DATE: February 22, 1983 iw Highway (Oe TRACT NO, 46 -2U -22 J.E.G. Const. Fenian. Paving Lee Const. E.L. Ye BID A:MN)NT BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT BID 3,000.00 13,264.00 5,100.00 3.W 7,391L.W 5.17 13,536,76 1D.00 26,280,00 6.59 1.70 9,639.00 2.81 15,932.70 1.20 6,804,00 .95 21.00 85,212.00 25.10 32,371.60 26.78 84,517,68 23.00 20.00 24,020,00 6.39 10,075.39 12.77 15,336,77 16.00 1.25 2,647,50 1.35 2,659.30 1.10 2,329,80 1.00 6.90 6,548.ID 6.89 5,538.61 5.75 5,456.75 8.50 6.CO 1, 2 GO. DO 4,63 995,45 5.50 1,182.50 7,W 110.00 3,410.00 151.27 4,689,37 IOD.00 3,100.00 120.00 350.00 7,525.00 325.00 6,987.50 430.00 10,320.00 700.00 1.25 3,650.00 1.00 2,920,00 1.50 4,380.00 1.50 28.00 952.00 29.00 986.00 36. W 1,224, W 4200 . 28.00 756.00 30.00 310.00 35.00 972.00 42.00 31.50 976.50 34.03 1,054,00 43,00 1,33} 00 42.00 45.00 7,470,00 56.00 9,296,00 62.00 10,292.00 55.00 200.00 1,400.00 200.00 1,400,00 150,00 1,050.00 75.W 37.00 1,850.0.0 43-OD 2,150.00 49.00 2,450,00 31.00 25.W 475,00 39.00 741,00 23.00 437,00 25.00 2,400.00 1,600.00 2,200.00 3,500.00 4,120.00 3.200.00 35.00 3,350,00 34.00 ],740.00 34.00 3,740,00 40.00 18.00 900,00 14.50 725.00 17,00 850,00 28,00 66,411.80 66,411.80 67,500.00 17.00 5,270,03 14.03 4,340.W 13.00 4,030.00 12,00 • 9er Laird Const, AMOUNT BID AMOUNT 2,100.00 15, WO. W 12,082,60 12.00 31,536.00 5,396,50 3.00 17,010.00 89,368.00 32.00 100,992,00 19,216.00 15.00 18,015,00 2, 113,W 2.00 4,236,00 8.056,506.60 6,263.40 1,505,00 6.30 1,354.50 3,720.00 95.00 2,945.00 15.050.00 500.00 10, 750.00 I. 38O,C0 1.10 3,212,00 ,1,428,00 70.00 2,380.00 1,134,00 70.00 1,890,00 1, 302,W 28.00 863.00 9,130.00 45.00 7,470,00 1,225.00 550.00 3,850.00 1,550.00 33.00 1,550.00 475.00 25.00 475.00 3,000.00 2,400.00 3,70000 3,50000 4,400.00 32.00 3,520.00 1,400.00 32.00 1,60D.00 74,WO.00 68,100.00 3,720.00 13.00 4,030.00 TOTALS $255,054.40 $256,036,90 $257,575.48 $264,085,50 $273,456.00 $313,046,90 • RESOLUTION NO. * , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS (05- 06 -55) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of Street Improvements on Carnelian Street, between 19th Street and Wilson Avenue have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 0 Jon D. Mike s, Mayor c • RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 307 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Ranch. Cucamonga, CA 91730 DATED: March 16, 1903 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner BY: n m, seas Na y or NOTICE OF COMPLETION 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estat, in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest Or estate is: CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS (05- 06 -55) 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 23rd day of February, 1983 then- was comp;ete4 on the hereinafter described real property the vorf of !-pr.vement set forth in the contract documents far: CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS (05- 06 -55) 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was Fontana Paving, 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows: 1. Carnelian Street between 19th Street and Nilson Avenue The street address of said property is: N/A DATED: March 16, 1903 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner BY: n m, seas Na y or 0 • r 1 t nrm ✓ nc. n n A1nI In 1I T1 ♦ T 1 1111 . STAFF REPORT?° DATE: March 16, 1983 F TO: City Council and City Manager — 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Loma Channel Assessment District Consultant Contract - Donald G. King & Associates Attached for Council approval is the consultant contract with Donald G. King and Associates as Environmental Impact Consultant for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District. Dr. King's agreement and proposal coincide with legal requirements to prepare an unbiased document on this project. Dr. King has provided an equitable and timely completion schedule with a not -to- exceed amount of E9,040.50. It may be noted that an Environmental Impact Report was part of the contract with Associated Engineers. It was determined that to the best interests of the City and Petitioners involved in the Assessment District, the Environmental Document should be prepared by a neutral party. Therefore, that portion of Associated Engineers' contract is eliminated with this action. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the consultant contract with Donald G. King and Associates to act as consultant to Assessment District 82 -2 and authorize the funding from the Drainage Fee fund. Respectfully sub LBH JLM:jaa Attachment CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . This agreement made this V day of 1983, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (hereinafter called to "City ") and DONALD G. KING & ASSOCIATES, 9375 Archibald Avenue, Suite 101, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, a corporation (hereinafter called "Consultant "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City solicited proposals for professional services related to their proposed Assessment District No. 82 -2, Alta Loma Flood Control Channel, and Consultant, by letter dated February 23, 1983, submitted a proposal; WHEREAS, the City has reviewed said proposal and finds it 40 acceptable to meet the needs of the City; WHEREAS, the City has, in its possession, a petition signed by over 60% of the landowners by area from within the projected benefited area of said public work. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: A. The City hereby employs the Consultant and the Consultant hereby accepts such employment to perform the services as generally described in the proposal of February 23, 1983, "Attachment A" hereto. B. The Consultant shall be an independent contractor and not an employee nor shall any of Consultant's employees, agents, or subcontractors be employed by the City. 1- • A Ia • C. The Consultant shall perform in a diligent manner the following services: 1. Assemble, review, and analyze all necessary sails, geology, hydrology, erosion, biota, population, land use, aesthetic, economic, traffic and circulation and engineering data and information which may have a bearing on the Focus Environmental Impact Report for the Alta Loma Flood Control Channel. 2. Prepare a preliminary (screen) report for Staff review, a public review draft for the workshops, and a Final Draft after public review period has ended. • FEE: Fee for services performed under this contract shall be paid monthly by the City upon receipt of an invoice by the Consultant based upon the fee schedule in the Attachement A. The fee for the work conducted pursuant to items listed in Attachment A will not exceed $9,040.50 and the Consultant will not proceed beyond this point, •44 thn::t written instructions to proceed from the City. The mailing address of the City is as follows: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 C Base llne Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 The mailing address of the Consultant is as follows: DONALD G. KING & ASSOCIATES 9375 Archibald Avenue, Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92730 -2- TERMINATION: I. CITY reserves and has the right and privilege of cancelling, suspending, or abandoning the execution of all or any work in connection with this agreement at anytime upon written notice to CONSULTANT. 2. In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished data, studies, maps, and report prepared by CONSULTNAT, shall at the option of CITY become CITY'S property, 3. In the event of termination CITY shall pay CONSULTANT for all services performed and all expenses incurred to date of termination of this agreement on a time and materials basis in accordance with CONTRACTOR'S standard billing rate set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, IN WITNESS NREREOF, said City has caused this contract to be 0 executed and attested by its proper officers duly authorized and the Consultant has caused this contract to be executed by one of its officers as of the date hereinafter set forth. • "CITY" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Title Date Attest: "CO^ LTA VT" 00. LO / KING SOCIATES /! AAA Title l Date %��?►*�lA ��i • -3- 1 ATTACHMENT A PRC.°OSAL No. 83 -10 Focused EIR, Alta Lcma Drainage System • Pace 10 of 70 Throughout the analysis arrd report preparation process the Consultant w; 11 maintain communication with the staff liaison. Periodic meetings will be held as appropriate, at the convenience of the City. The fee for this effort Is Itemized as follows: 1. SOILS and GEOLOGY S 875.00 2. HYDROLOGY E 780.00 3. BIOTIC ANALYSIS S1,49i.00 4. LAND USE, PLANNING, POPULATION CONSICERATIONS $1,94`.00 5. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS $1,925.00 6. VISUAL ANALYSIS $ 900,00 7. TRAFFIC /CIRCULATION ANALYSIS $ 446,00 8. PUBLIC SAFETY ANALYSIS E 330.00 9. CUMULATIVE/ GROWTH INDUCING ANALYSIS N/C SL13TOTAL 581696.00 • 10. MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES (estimate for a 65 page report) a. Word Processing $350.50 (est,) b. Photography at cost 575.00 TOTAL $9,040.50 This proposal and fees Include all meetings with the City Staff, outside agencies, nelghborhood groups and Individuals. Attendance at two (2) Public Hearings Is also Included. The Executive Summary, Project Description, Community Description and Alternatives sections of the Focused EIR are Included In the above fees. At the option of the City the Consultant will reproduce, collate, and bind copies of the draft /final EIR at actual cost plus 15% to cover handling and overhead. E ADDENUIM No. 1 • To ACRF.EAIENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES By this Addendum to "Agreement .'or Engineering Services" entered into on the 2nd day of December, 1982 between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation located in the State of California, County of San Bernardino, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and MILLS AND LILL ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC., with offices located at 016 East "E^ Street, Ontario, California 91764, hereinafter referred to as "STORM DRAIN ENG IhT ER ", additional services have been requested by the "CITY" and the "ENGINEER" has proposed to complete such services as outlined below, for no increase in fee. The proposed services to be completed by ENGINEER as referenced by his letter /proposal dated March 7, 1987, is as follows: ITEM NO ITE)T 1 Item 2 of Article 11 B is deleted from • the contract. 2 Item 8 of Article It B is modified as follows: Due to revised hydrology studies resulting in increased design rates of flow, the work shall include new construction plans for Line 7A between Wilson and Alta Lome 0asins. This Addendum does not change the maximum amount or the agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have executed this agreement on this day of ,1987. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.A, a municipal corporation By ATTEST: By _ Y MILLS S LILT. ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. By • . Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 316 EAST 'E STREET ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91764 • (714) 9885818 MAILING ADDRESS', P.O. 80X 9419, ONTARIO, CA 91761 March 7, 1983 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 L. tt7G;NEER!;1G C:V'S:0!I Subject: Environmental assessment for Alta Loma Channel and plans for portion of Line 3A. References: 1. Your letter of February 11, 1983. '. Our Preliminary Design Report February 1983. 3. Agreement for Engineering Services dated 2 December 1982. Dear Lloyd I have researched our records to reconstruct how we arrived at the contract amount of our fee in the agreement (Ref. 3) as compared to our original proposal. As you remember there were a number of modifications discussed from time to time, • most of which were not ultimately included. The agreement now differs from the original proposal in two main items, These are: ( 1) Item 2 of Article IIB of the agreement, the focused SIR, was not included in the original proposal. The fee added for this item was $4000. (2) Item 8 of Article IIB indicates that we would "Modify and adapt CITY approved plans for Line 3A between {Gilson Avenue and the Alta Loma Basin' rather than havine to provide plans for this section in their entire",. We evaluated those pfans as to savings and as a result reduced the fee 84200. There were some other minor items not involved in the current revision and also an inflation factor was apnll•_.i, Reference (B) on pages 3 and 4 indicates that in view of tho revised hydrology - and increased 4s it will be necessary to redesign and redraw the portion of line 3A between Wilson Avrnuc and the Alta Loma basins after all, instead of adapting the previously approved plans. Therefore the S1200 previously deducted should be increased by the inflation factor and added back into the contract and the 5.1000 added for the ZIR, also increased by the inflation factor, should be subtracted from the fee amount. However since the amount to be added is so nearly equal to the amount to be subtracted, the inflation factor is of negligible significance. I don't know whether you want an addendum to the contract or if you feel it could be handled simply by issuing another purchase order, since there. was a 49 P.O. (P.O. No. 4043) issued as well as the signed contract. The P.O. procedure is o.k. as far as Pm concerned, If you concur in the amounts either an addendum or a P,O• could be written in approximately the following form. I PLANNING OF Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga • March 7, 1983 Page 2 Modification of .AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES dated 2 December 1982 between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and MILLS AND LILL ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Fee Item No. Item Amount I Item 2 of Article II B is deleted from the contract. $4000 decrease 2 Item 8 of Article II B is modified as follows: Due to revised hydrology studies resulting in increased design rates of flow, the work shall include new construction plans for Line 3A between Wilson Avenue and the Alta Loma Basins. $4200 increase Net increase in fee $200• If the procedure will be greatly simplified by calling the two items an even • trade off we would accept such a finding. Please call me if we need further discussion. Cordi. IY, R.E. Mills REM:Ijn • I 0 EJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1983 F TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 7797, Bonds and Agreement - R. C. Associates, II - located on the south side of 8th Street approximately 440 feet east of Pittsburgh Avenue R. C. Associates has submitted the subject map which divides 68.79 acres of land into 3 parcels within Subarea 10 and 11 of the Industrial Specific plan for final Council approval. The map was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on January 12, 1983. Bonds and agreements have been submitted guaranteeing the construction of off - site improvements. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign said map and accepting said bonds and agreement. lly submitted, as Attachments 0 RESOLUTION NO. * `, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7797, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 7797), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7797, submitted by R.C. Associates, II, Subdivider, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the south side of 8th Street approximately 440 feet east of Pittsburgh Avenue, being a division of a portion of the S.W. 1/4, Section 7, T. 1 S., R. 6 W., S.B.B. and M. as per deed to Southern California Railway Company recorded April 11, 1902 in Book 315, page 469 of Deeds was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7797 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 7797 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0. ke ls, layor ATTEST: Mi a 0 Ll CIT1' 01' RA \CI 10 CUCA \10 \L:\ title; �. A IFm,7199 OV, ENGINEERING DIVISION vtclNtTV N ntnr ��� %illy �:.= �� -�_ -` TENTATIVE PARCEL "AP NO 7797 ........... PA�EL C=- .... ...... ff L Fir • • • yj M: W)l u • 1b It has been determined, from field investigation, that Rochester Avenue is in poor condition and should be reconstructed. Additionally, it has been determined that liquid asphalt prime coat is not necessary. Reconstruction of Rochester Avenue and deletion of the liquid asphalt prime coat would result in a net increase of $22,722.78 to the project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve Contract Change Order Number 2 resulting in an increase of approximately $22,722.78 to the project. Respectfully submi ted, LBH:MDL:bc Attachment r1 r ,� r STAFF REPORT C, DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager ,1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Resident Engineer, A.D. 82 -1 SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Contract Change Order No. 2 Relating to the Reconstruction of Rochester Avenue south of 8th Street It has been determined, from field investigation, that Rochester Avenue is in poor condition and should be reconstructed. Additionally, it has been determined that liquid asphalt prime coat is not necessary. Reconstruction of Rochester Avenue and deletion of the liquid asphalt prime coat would result in a net increase of $22,722.78 to the project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve Contract Change Order Number 2 resulting in an increase of approximately $22,722.78 to the project. Respectfully submi ted, LBH:MDL:bc Attachment r1 r ,� r 0 RESOLUTION NO. * ' it A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11696 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on March 16, 1983 by Vanguard Builders as Developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Sapphire Street at Garden Court; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Tract 11696: and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES; NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 5 don D. Mikels, Mayor TRACT N0. 11696 F STATE HIGHWAY R/W ' N/y tme of Po /ce/ (Ndavf'/,- te, z, ga nuF a Gas Fe. - N!f'JS'Y! "f J <I SL �' <ME rJ / <) � __ Jvrv' true<J ns or "' n/soJ; - -,e 9 e 4 ; --- ----------- --- -- ------ �-''°t R e- T ' I :� r1 ;, � , -" 59 o a 1xC mdf' )ffr' _ O /�\\ •5113 �• NOS'!J'We NOIG' I L RI » COURT 2 'n 9 vf� _ G /SCby /G6 0G" �^y QZ 1 ea r 1w. e p'Q i' p gyp° Vi. 11`r,f'` _ w P.M—_S. '; J21 4, p4IGf,' l� FIA f�. 4: (y 5 6 L 6fn[AL: 7c1Z D.Yf FCR U,'CCFG 4CC n'J �{ CONDUITS i'fR OS li•) / / /G! 4 NOSE i /1/5 SU.DD /YIS>ON /S JUOJ(CJ )a 14R / /A'O Of GAfCf OF F0000 N9ZFg0J pii \ y o FRJ.Y GKFMONG4 Cq£EK _ u bpw refsr (N /f •LYOC . n' Cds m9 �n tll lSi f /'1 a�. Oanguard Companies February 9, 1983 Community Development City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: Tract 11696, Garden Ct. Gentlemen: On March 9, 1982 Vanguard Companies signed a Subid-vision Improvement Agreement to record the above referenced tract. Since that time, the Industry has experienced considerable monetary set -backs rendering the project unfeasible at that time, However, conditions have changed in the past months, and all indicators are predicting an up -swing in the near future. Therefore, we respectively request an extention of our Subdivision Agreement to allow us the necessary time to complete our plan check and obtain our building permits. • Thank you for your consideration in this Natter. CAD /ms Sincerely, Colleen Dyck, Project Manager VANGUARD COMPANIES 9633 7th Sbcep Rancho Cocamo ^9a. Caldor Na 91730 (7 14) 987 6376 CJ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 11696 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is mad and entered into, in conforeance with the prev1S10n5 Of the Subdivision Nap ki, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a munic1pai corporation, by and between the saki City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Vanguard National guilders doa Vanguard Ventures referred to as the Developer, WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement with the City as a requisite to issuance of buildings permits, and WHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said improvement agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The completion date of the terms of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of 12 months from the date of expiration of the said agreement. 2. Increase in Improvement securities to reflect current improvement costs shall be furnished by the developer with this agreement and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 3. The required bond and the additional principal amounts thereof are set forth on the attached sheet. 4. All other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall • remain the Same. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent tJ comply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: man- Surety: Address: MATERIAL AND LAROR ONO Description: Additional Principal amount: none Surety: Add'als. CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTING WIND Additional Cash Deposit: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE $010 -- — Principal Amount One To be Posted prior . to acceptance' of the oroject by . the City',.'.'*♦w......... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation / Attest: _ Lauren M. Wasserman, ity Clerk- _ NOTE: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED' l: i /f re. iu - n �` LLV...666 c..rA Vlg4aVA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Sheet 1 of -5 PROJECT: Assessment District 82 -1 CONTRACT N0. A.D. 82 -1 TO: SONADTMAN- MCCAIN, INC. , Contractor. You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the fallowing described work not included in the plans and specifications on this contract. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by the City Council. Description of work to be done, estimate of quantities, and prices to be paid. Segregate between additional work at contract price, agreed price and force account. Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time and equipment is actually used and 10 allowance will be made for idle time. Change requested by: City of Rancho Cucamonga quantity in the Engineer's Estimate. /� 1. Delete requirement of prime coat from the Contract: 86,60 tons of liquid asphalt (Grade SC70) at s1B0 /Ton C2. Remove and reconstruct the westerly half of Rochester Avenue from - 515,624.00 STA 200+00 to 226+00 by 13 feet wide (average) = 33,800 sq. ft, a. Clear and grub 33,800 sq. ft. at 5.10 /S.F. _ + 53,330. b. Earthwork 413.11 C.Y. at S1,50 /C.Y. _ + 561' c. Baserock (0.33 ft. thick) = 803.09 tons at 59.00 /ion = + 57,22 d. A.C. Paving (Class 1B- AR4000) .ZS ft, thick 603.40 tans at $24.75 CReconstruct Rochester Ave: /Ton= 15,057. East side - Sta 200 +00 to Ste 226+00 (13 Ft,) Entire Street - Sta 229+18,63 to Sta 234+09.32 (35 ft, wide) (TOTAL S.F. - 50,974.20 S.F.) a. Earthwork (based on 0.41 ft. excavation) 774,05 C.Y. @ 1.50 /C.Y. _ . 1,161.08 IN. Baserock (0.33 ft. thick) 1211.15 tons @ 59.00 /tan - + 10,900.32 C. Asphalt concrete for this portion shall be Class 18 AR4000 and constructed 0,25 ft. thick Items 2a + 26 shall be paid per Section 3 -3.2 entitled "Payment^ of the Standard Specifications. All other items shall be paid per unit price shown. Payment shall be considered as full compensation for furnishing all labor, equipment and materials for accomplishing said work complete in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS Estimated Cost: Decrease 5 or increase $ 22,722.78 By reason o thu pr er i e time of completion will be adjusted as fp}Iows: and hereby agree. If this proposal Is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices shown above, /J Approved: Date 5'_3 contractor By:�//' — Mayor: Ass nss^�nnt Engineer: ���[�� Mayor; Date: —Z3 ••_,. Date: Attest LA I. I I . . . . . . . low fo" low low XY mi If FITI Of II"oIIO fICAM04OI . ....,. «........ FITI Of II"oIIO fICAM04OI 0 kMV/1. qvl 11A 111•"'9 0 0 loss Z. i4 Fn I wr, r CITY OF R. CFO CUCAME ",TV I "jai 4-1 ... ... . .. AF I lu U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager 19777 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 7864, Bonds and Agreement - American Industries (Biane Winery) located on the south side of 8th Street west of Turner Avenue The subject map located on the south side of 8th Street west of Turner Avenue submitted by American Industries (Biane Winery) was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on October 27, 1982. An agreement and bonds in the amount of $66,200 have been submitted to guarantee the off -site improvements for 8th Street and Turner Avenue. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of bonds and agreement and the signing of said parcel map. ReWectfully subTitted, LBH: BK:jaa Attachments 3 (' RESOLUTION NO. * `. ' f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7864, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7864), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7864, submitted by American Industries, Subdivider, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the south side of 8th Street West of Turner Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 3 and 4, Section 14, T. 1 S., R. 7 W., S.B.B.M. as recorded in Book 4, page 9 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, California was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7864 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Flap, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 7864 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0 MMikels, Mayor 0 ATTEST: I I I' nOp. i I F 1 ! _ u /Civ /ill iv& PARCEL MAP NO 7864 IN THE CITY 0,rRANCAio COCAMONGA p j .0ACAMT 9 > IHLSIYiMTIA UyOf � _0m BOGlu (I a rcm NT CANNSS .'!,` -�; �V_ = -�.:�= '--�'. ;+'_�� � •� i v�acec, gip- — — .I ly ._ �,,. �.., C}_ - TACAMT �I .e t _ i Y s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 7864 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, i n conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and AMERICAN INDUSTRIES COMPANY. INC, hereinaftt r to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Dveloper has requested approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordarce with the provisions of the report of the Community Development Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located sou:nnes:e r',i corner 8th Street and Turner enue and WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be at by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting cf improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at • develooer's expense all improvements desdripad on page 4 hereof with 12 months from the date hereof. 2. The tern of this agreement shall be 12 months, commencing on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term has been extended as he ^einafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and includinoa statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to , review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provlsl Ons of this agreemnnt, the City Shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by env lawful cones, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Eprety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. , Encroach- ob ,ent permits shall be tained by tha Oevelpoer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public rintl -of -way, and the do eloper small conduct inch work in full cor 01 ie nee with the regulations contained ,he r pin. Non -comol lice may result in stooping Of the Xprk by the City, and a; ;e;;^Rnt of the penalties provided. 6. Public riait - of - w iv Improvement work required sn all It o cn r 1 t u t ^ d ,n confer -lance v :n an proved ,-.pro ement plan;, b and a• ^, Specifications, and it, nd3rd Dr aw in qs and any special • f it am d endment5 thereto. Construction chaII inclue any trap srt c n p and /or other incidental work d. 0-ed necessary for drain ?g= p. public safety. 7. Work done .,thin existing streets shall be diligently pursued to come c, an; the City shall have the -, 5,t to complete any and all work in the event of unjustlf led delav in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred fro,, t-e Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful means. S. The Developer shall be resppnsr ble for real acenen:, relocations, or removal of any component of any irrigation w. ter system in conflict with the required work to the sat isfactI On of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system, 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all lapse rock and other debris from the public n ght- cf -wav 10, The Developer Shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director, 11, The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to oparantee completicn of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: • LI FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: P'inciPal Anount: 556.2Cz Name and address of Sure ;y:UNITEO PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPA.NY 1355 Willow Way, Ste. 101, Concord, CA 9C324 MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: S33,:E0 Name and address Of surety: UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COSPANY 1355 Willow Way, Ste, 101, Concord, CA 94524 CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal A,surt: Name and address of suretY: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE �-;Tecti Wlldllll4 — 1Y .°._. �._...-- _. -._.. - - - - -_ cauWnU Contra Costs Is lg� Wort me. IAe We,,1c d. a hot, Peal¢ m aM la a.d Sla:,. 4tn: r..y ,a,ld RnAnsi N v bur, tc .'t to be t ^e 1CLCR 2L'Taid .I dlAe lmn rir ind c e fnm�Rt' 7 Me Capaa . PatT"eoted IM rntmn Ineften"t. ;rom to me to ht Nt he eretNed the wthm Iolm nat, an behalf of the Capon tm. Then" na,vd, and aan to IM INt WKh fapNNm nehoted the Watt HELEN I. REPARO W- TN NW IN0- seal. ii YrG +nm.•Y- Iai.IreM Il, Ila1 t_ I[YpnlNNnt- fvwa' +I+VmII�O�n. 1M IIMV1 Mi[ min0 la IIN fYIe a Accepted: City of Rancho E'Jca.,,0"A, California A Munic Pal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: " -- CiiY CTerx j , C.tYY �ttprueY E OE /ELOPE:S STANATIIPES ?'.CST GF. ATARI2EO ?.i 0 amends. on is thereto. Construction shall include any transit •,one and /or other incidental work dee-.ed necessary for dr a inane c. public safety. - 7. Work done within esi sting streets shall be diligently pursued to conaletlon; the City S a 1 have the 'r t to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay completion, and to recover all cos: and expense incurred from t-e Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. S. The Developer shall be responsible for rent ace -.ent, relocations, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal pf all loose rack and other debris from the public right- of -wav 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by : Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorne v. Tue principal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: O I* n • CM a, 1".01:1 M3%qlrlt Qh411C,[lfl(N :1 \n WN) wrp'syll, T]a(]UV]N73cr I'llf-11 r 14T. s 113Ur: For of: 8th StIePt Ind 7:irlel A,,,e Dale: feII-I,aIY 16 — . c-4,. File 1 1, currant fee writing or writing — ".rit I,rt ,r,n ju:.; P.C.C. Curb - 12" C.F. P.C.C. Enid - 8" C.F. 1123 650 761; P.C.C. Curb only 6" C.F. A.G. 15.'00 nn,.) 50 4.50 2-'- 4' P.C.C. Sidc.lk 6" Drive idprmeh 775 2,50 8" P.C.C. Cross Gutter Street Esiiatien 250 C.Y. 1.50 37- ' 1Wd Ecdw,�,cnt 650 C.Y. 1.50 9- Preparation of Sur",,d, 19,35' S.F. 0.19 2K3 Dushad Azl-.,r.qdtc 51s, (pc r4 inch thick) 1:,450 S.F. C C9 1-5 A.C. (.,c, 1360 tons) A.C. (900 to 1300 tons) A.C. (under 500 to 900 tons) 218 60.20 A.C. (under tons) Patch AX, (trench) ,0. V thick A.C. Ch,arls, 10,000 S.F. 0.30 • Adjust 1. f,nd. 3 EA. 250.00 Adjust sewer , clear, out to gr.dc Adjust ,iter valves to grodeL valt 1 EA. 375.00 street i,igm, 4 EA. 1500.00 Street S',' "'- Street T ... s Barricades 'Irto.rsec. 5500 nin) MIN L.S. Removal of A.C. N,er,nt 9900 S.F. 0.35 1056 Rehr,al of P.C.C. Curb 320 3.30 1056 Raflectcrs & Post, 4 EA. M.00 140 Retainiq '5x11 SO L.F. MOO Ic" 24' RCP (1501 D) 250 36.60 75 --,, Catch Basin W = S' I EA. 2000.00 20,00 Local Dcpa,ess.on 8' i EA. 800.30 Soo Jul�tiii, St,,.tore I EA. 1500.00 1500 Sawcnt 909 1.00 800 'L'c't L.S, 3000 1 mf1%U:IIb4 C6 GUN r N ;iXIv ( Ts Mid, (",9 Mvrnm 5611,171 11 "17U:n (1000 <.. c L"Im xn -.;%mml v, SI'IVRM . 00 , tO 533.150 ";INTJ-fl% IN5i,irri( iij, •I u10:1 Nr VI VIR SLIOM 0 IL zz' 4 BOND NO. C +3 6A )S • PMMI.: $1,19E.Oo FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND sHEREAS, the City council of the city of Rancho Cue_ man ;v, State of California, and MYERIG \N INDFSTRIES 20>TAN'(. i:;C, (hereinafter designated es "pfiI- P111 ") have ehtQlca into ae agreement whereby principal agrees to Install and a ^aletc certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated FF an Ally 78 , t983 • and Identified .is project P.M. 7F6= is nerebv referred to and made a part hereot;and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal end CNITED PICI.fC INSUR;NCE CPY.PANY as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Qty of aane. :o Cucamonga (hereinafter celled ^city'•), in the penal sum of S'rty -Six Thousand Two NlmAred and nn /1Cn __-------------------- Dollurs $ 56,20ML) lawful money of the United sates, for the papeent of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators. successors or assigns, shall In all linters stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made . as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and marine, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including rensonebie attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered, The surely hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to he performed thereunder or the speci- fientionx accompanying the some shell In anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of lima, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN to I'rNESS WTIEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on FEAK Ry 26 19 RU--. MIERICAN INDUSTRIES COMM, M, INC. UNITED PACIFIC INSCRAN6E COHPAN'Y flove10"oI surd y� �� / ay: : 191 =nd nrel :I0'RNR. ``•in -ftn¢IJ • ROBE RS it. ,,, VICE -PRE$t DEN JUIW R. FISCIIER pIXASR ATTAMI POWER OF AT7ORNI:Y TO 41,1, RONUS GEE :, IIIhnT IiRES ISJSf i:E 119i R ;�iO E.1 i Boon No. L' 43 64 28 PR &YILN INCLUDED Io PERFUFOLINC`- 30N1) • LABOR AND M1NTI:R IALSfEN BOND WHLREAS, the City Council of the City of Honcho Cocamon -1. State Of Cal i fern is, and MERECAN INDL'STRTES COYPSNY, TNC. (hereinafter designated us "principal ") have entered into an agreement wherebv principal agrees to install and camp!a:e c r is in desiganted public improvements, whi Ch said Ag r cemen t, dated FEBRUARY 28, . 198 7 , And identified as project . is herebv referred to and msce a port hereof; and M SREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal raga Vred before entering upon the performance of the wore. to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rnnr ".o Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 71)9^.) of Part 4 of Division Of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned 1)s a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rnncho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materielmon and other persons employed in the performance of tho aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code Of Civil Procedure in the sum of Eait r... TV•re u...ren Dollars ($ sa v1) nn ), for materials furnVsneO or •lauor thereon of a kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hercinabove set forth. and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will Be, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, Including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such oblir.ti.n, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be • included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bend shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies one] corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 ( commencing with Section 7082) of Pert 4 of Divison 7 of the Civil Code, co as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and etreat. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time. Allerntion ar odditi.A to the terms Of sold agreement or • b.. c,c Ifications nccompnnving the same shall in . r.1)_: �Wm a', affect i,, nnii¢,tiona on this bond, and it does here- by waive a., , no of any 5u e.h rh n n; e, extension, cite r ti on or A d d, lloA. M WITNESS Isl MLOF, this instrument has bran duly executed by the. nrineinal nntl 5ur,ty above anmed, on FF.IVWAR1' :3, 199 1 ANENICAN INIR'.STRIES COMPANY INC _ METED PACIFIC INSURANCE C(*PAN( 7" PY: Tdi ;1).V it I \tiara...-- in- 1'ncll ROBE RT I1. Y1l %, VICE- PRfS[0 NI •OIIN R. FISEIIER • PLEASE. ATTACH POHTSII OF ATTORNEY TO ALL, BONDS hl 1, )IGUT2si5 MJST uE i•d T'%Rl1GU 1 a7 r 0 • 49 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Y F DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bonds Tract No. 9193 - Located on the east side of Vineyard south of Base Line OWNER: The William Lyon Co. 9613 Arrow Hwy., Suite K Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $10,000 Tract No. 9262 - Located on the east side of Vineyard south of Base Line OWNER. The William Lyon Co. 9613 Arrow Hwy., Suite K Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $20,000 The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion. Respectfully submitted, C *41" LBH:bc Attachments 9 RESOLUTION NO. * C- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 9193 AND TRACT NO. 9262 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE 'WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract NO. 9193 and Tract No. 9262 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to Sion and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Jon 0. Mike s, Mayor I l.'l • RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 G� NOTICE OF COMPLETION 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature Of which interest or estate is: Tract No. 9252 2. The full name and address Of the undersigned owner is: • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, 3. On the 16th day of March, 1933, there nas comoleted on the hereinafter described real property the ,. ork of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tract No. 9262 4. The name of the Original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: The William Lyon Company 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, state of California, and is described as follows: Tract No. 9262 The street address of said property is: N/A DATED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner OY; _ ,1 O`111- Mi YfLS �- MAYOR is 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Boa 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Boa 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION I. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract No, 9193 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Box 8046 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 16th day of March, 1993, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for; Tract No. 9193 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: The William Lyon Company S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows: Tract No. 9193 The street address of said property is: N/A DATED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner BY: JON 0. MIKELS MAYOR • 0 Work for the following tracts has been completed, and the guarantee bonds are hereby authorized by the Planning Department for release to Levis Homes, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, California 91786. Amount Purpose/ Tract No. Lot No. of Bonds Case No. Location 9454 35 $2000.00 Imperial S &L Subdivision #42- 1047036 Sales Office & Sign 9454 $ 500.00 Imperial S &L Located on N42- 1048943 Lot 35 - Tr. 9454 9567 03 $2294,00 Imperial S8L Subdivision #42- 1063769 Sales 0`ficc & Sign 9567 $ 575.00 Imperial S &L Located on #42- 1063751 Lot 3 - Tr. 9567 11461 01 $ 500.00 Imperial S &L Subdivision N42- 1075342 Sign on Lot 01 - Tr. 11461 Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions regarding these bond releases, please call. GWR /kap � — J MEMORANDUM DATE: February 24, 1983 TO: Harry Empey, Director of Finance 1977 " - FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T.O.P. BONDS FOR LEWIS HOMES Work for the following tracts has been completed, and the guarantee bonds are hereby authorized by the Planning Department for release to Levis Homes, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, California 91786. Amount Purpose/ Tract No. Lot No. of Bonds Case No. Location 9454 35 $2000.00 Imperial S &L Subdivision #42- 1047036 Sales Office & Sign 9454 $ 500.00 Imperial S &L Located on N42- 1048943 Lot 35 - Tr. 9454 9567 03 $2294,00 Imperial S8L Subdivision #42- 1063769 Sales 0`ficc & Sign 9567 $ 575.00 Imperial S &L Located on #42- 1063751 Lot 3 - Tr. 9567 11461 01 $ 500.00 Imperial S &L Subdivision N42- 1075342 Sign on Lot 01 - Tr. 11461 Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions regarding these bond releases, please call. GWR /kap � — J /J— :Ls U� r Gb6O4 To 2 Jlrs: I��. E R :S V L / SUB1ECi / � .� CIA �Q., DATE 3 /O / 7j S MESSAGE SIGNED REPLY f Yh(19f I74-'wi C,4 GNPA gOmdNISTRATIpN MAR 8 �rnicoaiN,a 4S 472 • Y SIGNED DATE SEND Peers T ANA a MTN CARBON INTACT - POLY PAK (50 SETSI 4P472 PART a WILL R MURHW WITH NINNY. &L &cJv .� l � kit o u L(N- CITY O?AA2O CUC ONGA N7H- 76 13j5�s -algy I.,17CF7 r) a ;iJOi GARVEY AVENUE O TELEPHONE 448-768l • 283 621-7 ESTIMATE OF REPAIRS OATE-_/,_J6 NAME - DWUCTS_ MILEAGE /- TEL INSURED B1__ �i___POLICY NO CU$T. P0• ,00MESS AOJUSTER---- TEL. --. 1. T- yn MOTOR slEIAL L C 1 7 I- I,. REPAIR 1111cE JAIII .1 IRRIAIR AN. NIIIAcIC.IENT. • LABOq IN NflS. 1A.Ta Al. MATERIAL L sT lllllcE aIll NET ANO .110 Sublet $ 1A,Ns SU41E ` 1 10 $ e5— ESTIMATE TOTAL $ 7 /Z 11 /-Y (I L11 " . . ........ ..... ni15 A, R'All lA 1 .1 Lab ro & S 1—" HIS — I Par Le,s____.% Disc. Net Pet, Sublet $ 1A,Ns SU41E ` 1 10 Sales Tax $ IRLIING ESTIMATE TOTAL $ .......... C,,,.,, ADVANCE CHARGES S GRAND TOTAL TO -;n ;,� r//�� F M SUBJECT MES DATE SIGNED REPLY SIGNED DATE SEND PARIS I AND 7 WITH CARBON INTACT - .. POLY PAK (50 SETS) 0472 REOi:OFNNB i$ 472 SEND 1 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP • n u nnc�cn r_� SIGNED �� REDLY SIGNED DATE �iEOCli3 ]s 4S472 _ , , SMO PARR t ANO R WITH CARBON INTACT „ _ ....POLY PAN (50 SETS 4PA74 PART 3 WILL RE RETURNED WITH REPLT. I 0 D VA.. Vl' 11[11YV P -V VUVtflY1V1V Vt1 MEMORANDUM March 8, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Harry Empey - Finance Director SUBJECT: Cash Flow The General Fund is currently suffering a negative cash flow situation. Revenues have just not kept up with expenditures. �p C.Vu`^fpn, `C 9 4 1 yin U, 6 1977 -- As you can see from the General Fund balance sheet, there just is not enough cash to meet the demand from reserves. This means that with reserves invested totally, then the difference has to be met with funds from another source. To eliminate this sit- uation it is necessary to relieve a portion of reserves for cash flow purposes. Therefore it is recommended that $500,000 in reserves be redesignated for the purposes of meeting cash flow demand in the General Fund. It is felt the General Fund will return to normal by the end of April at which point, if appropriate, the redesignated reserves will be returned to the status of reserved for changes in economic conditions. HE /sm BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FUND AS OF 2/28/83 Cash $2,525,313.21 Petty Cash 550.00 Accounts Receivable 235,681.30 Due from other funds 95,815.35 Accured payroll expense $ 20,922.01 Contracts payable 17,158.50 Res. for encumbrances 19,366.01 Revenue control 3,923,386.44 Expenditure contrcl 4,446.284.69 Reserves 2,626,509.00 Fund balance 696,302.59 TOTAL $7,303,644.55 $7,303,644.55 ✓r, • ORDINANCE N0. * ? %� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 181 -07, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND VICTORIA AVENUES, FROM R -3 -T TO R -3 /PD The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. . C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessor's Parcel Number 202 - 131 -07, approximately 8.98 acres in size and located at the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria Avenues, is hereby changed from R -3 -7 (Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PO (Multiple Family Residential /Pl,:anad SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1983. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: r �? u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Vacation of a Portion of 7th Street o Cc;CAAiot c�r 9 �4 s California Finished Metals, Inc., has requested the City vacate the portion of 7th Street no longer required by the Industrial Specific Plan. At the present time, 7th Street between Center and Haven Avenue is 60 feet wide with an additional 14 foot offer of dedication on the south side adjacent to California Finished Metals, Inc. This makes the present half width of 7th Street at the site 44 feet. Since the Industrial Specific Plan (SubArea 5) reduces this right -of -way to a half width of 27 feet, 17 feet remains to be vacated. The existing curb and gutter has been constructed quite some time ago. With the reduction in street width, these existing improvements must be removed. California Finished Metals will remove the existing improvements and replace them in the new location or bond for such work before the vacation is recorded. Planning Commission has reviewed this vacation at their meeting of February 23, 1983 and recommended that Staff forward it to City Council. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the summarily vacation of a portion 7th Street and authorizing the City Clerk to record said resolution. Respectfully submitted, ��i�' /- �L`-'C�w/ LBH:BK:jaa Attachments 3AV NAAVH -I -SAV H31N30 z o U - < Z L _ T :J Z ? y L F- y a W M O 6 W m O F SP; SUBAREA 5 (Continued) Right-Of-Way - Archibald 88' Right-Of-Way - 6th 0) 12'1 14'1 12'13 112 1 14"12' 38'n. ROW 741 Right-Of-Way - Turner I a JML�12 ' 7 ��east. 2 541 Right-Of-Way - 7th Bch p Center and all other local streets 22'ft..l 2211. "511. 54'd ROW Minimum Parcel Size One (1) acre IV-25 100, IC 19 12 12 12 18 t4j Right-Of-Way - Archibald 88' Right-Of-Way - 6th 0) 12'1 14'1 12'13 112 1 14"12' 38'n. ROW 741 Right-Of-Way - Turner I a JML�12 ' 7 ��east. 2 541 Right-Of-Way - 7th Bch p Center and all other local streets 22'ft..l 2211. "511. 54'd ROW Minimum Parcel Size One (1) acre IV-25 il(L N -S CBICULATIOM ® 120' B.O.W. lOV B.O.W. 88' or k ss B.O.W. t'Y'YY -t E.Mlpil + + + +f- Apposed 0 0 0 J Peee:trlan D • Bicycle QC� at MWt, -UWt�IHe '•"'e^�'^" Special Streelscape/ WndscaDin9 ... _ ... ........ Power Line/ Utility Easement .sw, Creeks It Channels I i>-dae 11, Access Points OFire Station 1 OSherrilf Station 0 600' BOO' 1600' note: Parcel ilia amp let comllyoralbna are shown as approximation only. The ones shown may not he eerrenty ownod nor is the location site specific _ The depletion of a sne is an Indication of a Projected loose Iwed that may be adArsted o'er tyre as tae City develops. ryrlpa+a'� 'iAhlylk. �.hrlei'(V.4alh$rS.•."... .. ... �- c.� Lfl '. ail "t is M -7 C (; ,� ( '( ' �,(j CAL'FORNIA FINISHED METALS'.:NC. ` \ \ \\ 1 11 ` I �I I` .. —r a 9139 CENTER AVE., CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 (714) 9B74%1 m January 25, 1905 ,Pty N l 1,E3 wy Of RARCl10 CUCnM0:1Gd city of 3anchc Cucamonga tg�(yE(R1NG 01v iS :C�II P.C. Eox 007 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91.730 Attention: Paul Rcugeau Enclosed are ccFies of dccuc,ents requested by your of_`i.ce in order to proceed in our request for vacation of a portion of 7th Street, As a result of our telephone conversation, these documents are suppled instead of the information requested in Vovemher cy Earbara Krell. • eery truly yours, CALI- ,031!!A METALS, Ii:C. 2lµfwu� W✓ G,L. Hemenover, General Manager GLH /ce Enclosures: 1, Full Reconveyance 2. Ind'vidual. Grant Deed - (2) 3. Parcel map 4. Check i. / • RESOLUTION NO. * ; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�'ONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACAT107 OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that a portion of 7th Street is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street on Map V -025 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part • thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portio�th Street no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. L J SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren IM. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor , 0 • EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL A The parcels of land as described in the deed of the offer of dedication of an easement to the County of San Bernardino for highway and road purposes as recorded in Book 7066, Page 103, official records of the said County, as the said offer of dedication is also shown in Parcel Map No. 1892 as recorded in Book 26, Page 32 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. PARCEL B The southerly 3 feet of 20th Street (also known as 7th Street), 60 feet wide, as shown on said Parcel Map No. 1392 lying between the east right -of -way line of Center Avenue and the east boundary line of the said Parcel Map No. 1892. 7_J r L U1 ti wa a w ar�a.vuv vwnuava.vn MEMORANDUM oil F� 1977 DATE: March 1, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Harry Empey - Finance Direcfo; _ SUBJECT: Bed Tax and Admissions Tax Bed Tax and Admissions Tax are two of the few remaining mechanisms open to cities to raise revenue and maintain local control. These particular taxes are not large revenue sources, however, they have the potential to be a significant factor in the General Fund in the future. One item that needs clarification us that these taxes are not special. taxes. These types of taxes are deposited in the General Fund for general use, therefore, an election is not required. These types of taxes are identified with growth. This is, of course, as it should he. As the community grows, so will these types of taxes. As tile. community grows so does the natural demand for services. The Farrell case has opened the door heretofore closed to general law cities. What once was the exclusl�, right of charter cities is now the domain of general iaw citi„a ns urcli. Therefore, while the opportunity exists, it is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinances for Bed Tax and Admis- sions Tax. HJE /wa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM February 9, 1993 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren Wasserman, / City Manager SUBJECT: Bed Tax and Admissions Tax On the next City Council agenda for consideration March 16, the council will have two ordinances; one proposing a bed tax for motels and the other an admissions tax for theaters and similar recreational activities. It is important, in our view, to have these two taxes on the books before we have major hotels or other entertainment activities in the city. At the present time the bed tax would affect the New Kansan Motel and Club 66. However, we all are well aware of the city's potential for having a large hotel similar to the Red Lion at some poiint in the near future. The same rationale is true of the admissions tax. The only retail establish- ment impacted by the proposed 53 admissions tax is the roller rink. The real purpose of the tax is, again, to deal with future activities. We are certain that down the road the city will have an entertainment center with numerous theaters. There is substantial revenue to be gained from the admissions tax. Incidentally, the admissions tax is a tax that the city previously has been unable to implement. However, due to recent court decisions general law cities now have the same authority as charter cities with respect to special taxes. Centlemen, I think you are well aware of the city's financial problems. They probably will get worse before they get better. The admissions tax and the bed tax are two taxes which the city can implement with a minimum of resistance. We would like to discuss this issue with you prior to the meeting of the 16th. LMW:mk A • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.40 THERETO TO IMPOSE A TAX UPON THE PRIVI- LEGE OF TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amenued by adding Chapter 3.40 thereto to read as follows: Sections: 3.40.010 3.40.020 3.40.030 . 3.40.040 3. 40.050 3. 40.060 3.40.070 3.40.080 3.40.090 3.4C.100 3.40.110 3.40.120 3.40.130 3.40. ;0 Chapter 3.40 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX Definitions. Imposition, Generally. Allowance for Collection Costs. Collection by Operators. Registration of hotel Operators; Issuance and Contents of Registration Certificate. Filing of Report and Remittance of Tax Collector Penalties for Delinquent Payment. Determination of Tax by Director of Finance Upon Failure of Operator to Collect and Report. Appeals. Records to be Kept for Three Years. Enforcement. Disbursement. Violations. 3.40.010 Definitions. Except where_ the context otherwise requires, the definitions given in this section Govern the Con- struction of this chapter: A. PC "Person" means any inuividual, f,.r;r, partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, joint sLock company, corporation, estate, trust, business trust, receiver, trustee, syndicate, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. S. Hotel. "Hotel" means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging house, rooming house, apartment house, dor- mitory, public or private club, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location, or other similar structure or portion thereof. C. Occupancy. "Occupancy" means the use or possession or the right to the use or possession of any room or rooms or portion • thereof, in any hotel for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes. D. Transient. "Transient" means any person who exercises occupancy or is entitled to occupancy by reason of concession, per- mit, right of access, license or other agreement for a period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions o.- calendar days as full days. Any such person so occupying space in a hotel shall be deemed to be a transient until the period of thirty (30) days has expired, unless there is an agreement in writ- ing between the operator and the occupant providing for a longer period of occupancy. In determining whether a person is a trans- ient, uninterrupted periods of time extending both prior and sub- sequent to the effective date of this chapter may be considered. E. Rent. "Rent" means the consideration charged, whether or not received, for the occupancy of space in a hotel valued in money, whether to be received in money, goods, labor or otherwise, includ- ing all receipts, cash, credits and property and services of any kind or nature, without any deduction therefrom whatsoever. F. Operator. "Operator" means a person who is proprietor of the hotel, whether in the capacity of owner, lessee, sublessee, mortgagee in possession, licensee or any other capacity. Where the operator performs his functions through a managing agent of any type or character other than an employee, the managing agent shall also be deemed an operator for the purposes of this chapter and shall have the same duties and liabilities as his principal. Com- pliance with the provisions of this chapter by either the principal • or the managing agent shall, however, be considered to be compliance b-i both. 3.40.020 imposition, Generally. For the privilege of occu- pancy in any hotel, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of ten (10) percent of the rent charged by the operator. Said tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the. City which 45 oXtinguished only by payment to the operator or to the City. The transient shall pay the tax to the operator of the hotel at the time the rent is paid. If the rent is paid in install- ments, a proportionate share of the tax shall be paid with each installr„ant. - - t..., s.. -.... be Sue upon transient's ceasing to occupy space in theLLhoter. it ror any reason the tar, due is not paid to the operator of the hotel, the Director of Finance may require that such tax shall be paid directly to the Director of Finance. 3.40.030 Allowance for Collection Costs. From the full amount of the ta:: collected and transmitted to the Director of Finance pursuant to this chapter, each operator may deduct and retain as for his administrative expense in the collection of said tax, an amount equal to four (4) percent of the total tax to be paid. 3.40.040 Collection by Operators. Each operator shall collect • the tax imposed by this cheater to the same extent and at the same time as the rent is collected from every transient. The amount of tax shall be separately stated from the amount of the rent charged, • and each transient shall receive a receipt for payment from the operator. No operator of a hotel shall advertise or state in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, that the tax or any part thereof will be assumed or absorbed by the operator, or that it will not be added to the rent, or that, if added, any part will be refunded except in the manner hereinafter provided. 3.40.050 Registration of Hotel Operators; Issuance and of Registration Certificate. Within thirty (30) days after effective date of this chapter, or within thirty (30) days after commencing business, which ever is later, each operator of any hotel renting occupancy to transients shall register said hotel with the Director of Finance and obtain from him a "Transient Occupancy Registration Certificate" to be at all times posted in a conspicu- ous place on the premises. Said certificate shall, among other things, state the following: A. The name of the operator; D. The address of the hotel; C. The day upon which the certificate was issued; D. "This Transient occupancy Registration Certificate signi- fies that the person named on the face hereof has fulfilled the requirements of the uniform transient occupancy tax ordinance by registering with the Director of Finance for the purpose of collect- ing from transients the transient occupancy tax and remitting said tax to the Director of Finance. This certificate does not authorize any person to conduct any unlawful business or to conduct any law- ful business in an unlawful manner, nor to operate a hotel without strictly complying with all local applicable laws, including but not limited to those requiring a permit from any board, commission, department or office of this City. This certificate does not con- stitute a permit. ". 3.40.060 Filing of Report and Remittance of Tax Collected. Each operator shall, on or before the last day of the month follow- ing the close of each calendar quarter, or at the close of any shorter reporting period which may be established by the Director of Finance, make a return to the Director of Finance, on forms provided by him /her, of the total rents charged and received and the amount of tax collected from transient occupancies. At the time the return is filed, the full amount of the tax collected shall be remitted to the Director of Finance. The Director of Finance may establish shorter reporting periods for any certifi- cato holder if he deems it necessary in order to insure collection of the tax and he may require further information in the return. Returns and payments are due immediately upon cessation of business for any reason. All taxes collected by operators pursuant to this chapter shall be held in trust for the account of the City until payment thereof is made to the Director of Finance. 3.40.070 Penalties for Delinquent Fayment. A. Original delinquency. Any operator who fails to remit any tax imposed by • this chapter within the time required shall pay a penalty of ten (10) percent of the amount of the tax in addition to the amount of the ta>:. B. Continued delinquency. Any operator who fails to remit any delinquent remittance on or before a period of thirty (30) days following the date on which the remittance first became delinquent • shall pay a second delinquency penalty of ten (10) percent of the amount of the tax, in addition to the amount of the tax and the-ten (10) percent penalty first imposed. C. Fraud. If the Director of Finance determines that the non - payment of any remittance due under this chapter is due to fraud, a penalty of twenty -five (25) percent of the amount of the tax shall he added thereto, in addition to the penalties stated in Subpara- graphs (A) and (B) of this Section. D. Interest. In addition to the penalties imposed, any opera- tor who fails to remit any tax imposed by this chapter shall pay interest at the rate of one (1) percent per month, or fraction thereof, on the amount of the tax, exclusive of penalties from the date on which the remittance first became delinquent until paid. E. Penalties Merged with Tax. Every penalty imposed and such interest as accrues under the provisions of this Section shall become a part of the tax herein required to be paid. Failure of Operator to Collect and Report_ It any operator shall fail or refuse to collect said tax and to make, within the time provided in this chapter, any report and remittance of said tax or portion thereof required by this chapter, the Director of Finance shall proceed in such manner as he may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As soon as the Director of Finance shall procure such facts and infor- mation as he is able to obtain upon which to base the assessment of any tax imposed by this chapter and payable by any operator who has failed or refused to collect the same and to make such report and remittance, he shall proceed to determine and assess against such operator the tax, interest and penalties provided for by this chap- ter. In case such determination is made, the Director of Finance shall give a notice of the amount so assessed by serving it person- ally or by depositing it in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the operator so assessed, at his last known place of address. Such operator may within ten (10) days after the serving or mailing of such notice make application in writing to the Director of Finance for a hearing on the amount assessed. If application by the operator for a hearing is not made within the time prescribed, the tax, interest and penalties, if any, determined by the Director of Finance shall become final and conclusive and immediately due and payable. If such application is made, the Director of Finance shall give not less than five (5) days written notice in the manner prescribed herein to the operator to show cause at a time and place fixed in said notice why said amount specified therein should not be fixed for such tax, interest and penalties. At such hearing, the operator may appear and offer evidence why such specified tax, interest and penalties should not be so faxed. After such hearing the Director of Finance shall determine the proper tax to be remit- ted and shall thereafter give written notice to the person in the manner, prescribed herein of such determination and the amount of • such tax, interest and penalties. The amount determined to be due shall be payable after fifteen (15) days unless an appeal is taken as provided in Section 3.40.090. • 3.40.090 Appeals. Any operator aggrieved by any decision of the Director of Finance with respect to the amount of such tax, interest and penalties, if any, may appeal to the City Council liy filing notice of appeal with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) days of the serving or mailing of the determination of tax due. _ The Council shall fix a time and place for hearing such appeal, and the City Clerk shall give notice in writing to such operator at his last known place of address. The findings of the Council shall be final and conclusive, and shall be served upon the appel- lant in the manner prescribed above for service of notice of hear- ing. Any amount found to be due shall be immediately due and pay- able upon the service of notice. 3.40.100 Records to be Kept for Three Years. It shall be the duty of every operator liable for the collection and payment to the City of any tax imposed by this chapter to keep and preserve, for a period of three (3) years, all records as may be necessary to determine the amount of such tax as he may have been liable for the collection of and payment to the City, which records the Director of Finance shall have right to inspect at all reasonable times. 3.40.110 Enforcement. Any tax required to be paid by any transient under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a debt owed by the transient to the City. Any such tax collected by an operator which has not been paid to the City shall be deemed a debt owed by the operator to the City. Any person owing money to the City under the provisions of this chapter shall be liable to an action brought in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the recovery of such amount. 3.40.120 Disbursement. All monies received by the City from the collection of transient occupancy tax shall be paid into the General. Fund. 3.40.130 Violations. Any person violating any provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punish- able therefor by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars (5500.00), _ by t.... ounty ;ail for a period of not more than si:a(6)lmontns, or oy 'ooth such fine and imprison- ment. Any operator or other person who fails or refuses to regis- ter as required herein or to furnish any return required to be made, or who fails or refuses to furnish a supplemental return or other data required by the Director of Finance, or who renders a false or fraudulent return or claim is guilty of a misdemeanor, and and is punishable as aforesaid. Any person required to make, render, submit or verify any report or claim who makes any false or fraudu- lent report or claim with intent to defeat or evade the determination of any amount due required by this chapter to be made, is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as aforesaid. 3_40.140 Effective Date. This chapter shall take effect in thirty (30) days after adoption, except that the tax imposed by this chapter shall become operative on July 1, 1983. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence • clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional, then all other provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circula- tion, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MAYOR ATTEST: 0 CITY CLERK i 1 LJ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNI- CIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.36 THERETO TO IMPOSE AN ADMISSIONS TAX. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 3.36 thereto to read as follows: Sections: 3.36.010 3.36.020 3.36.030 3.36. 040 3.36.050 3.36.060 3.36.070 3.36.080 3.36.090 3.36.100 3. 36.110 3.36.1^20 3.36.130 3.36.140 3.36.150 Chapter 3.36 ADMISSIONS TAX Definitions. Imposition of Tax. Season Pass. Collection and Payment. Accounting and Payment to the City. Form of Return for Accounting. Alternate Procedure. Failure to File Accountings or to Pay Over Tax. Interest. Willful Failure to Account or to Pay Over Tax. .joint and Several Liability of Operator and Person Collecting Tax. aintenance of Action. Payment by Operator in Lieu of Collecting Tax. Exemptions. Use of Proceeds. 3.36.010 Definition=_. For the purposes of this chapter, cer- tain words and phrases used in this chapter shall be construed as set forth in this section unless it is apparent from the entire context that a different meaning is intended. A. ADMISSION: "admission" includes every act of entry by a person or patron to any portion of any premises. D. ATTEND: "attend" includes the terms; see, view, witness, enjoy, watch, be present at, and participate in. C. ADMISSION PRICE: "admission price" includes money, and in addition to or in lieu of money, any valuable consideration paid, given or received in exchange for the right or privilege of admit- tance to any premises or attending any event, and any additional consideration paid, given or received after admission to any premises in exchange for the right or privilege of admission to or use of any portion of such premises or any accomodations or facilities therein located or provided. D. CONDUCT: "conduct" includes operate, carry -on, maintain, keep, render, • perform, hold, give, put -on and exhibit. E. EVENT: "event" includes every moving picture performance, exhibition, fair, meeting, performance, race, dance, demonstration, or attraction at which live participation by human beings or ani- mals is involved, for which a separate or additional admission price is paid for the right or privilege of attending or being admitted to the same. "Event" also includes the right or privilege of park- ing a motor vehicle for which a separate or additional admission price is paid for such right or privilege. F. OPERATOR: "operator" includes any person, association, firm, or corporation owning, operating, conducting, directing, managing, or controlling, alone or in conjunction with or indepen- dent contractor, any event or portion of which is subject to any tax imposed by any provision of this chapter. G. PATRON: "patron" includes any person who pays or, on account of whom is paid, any admission price for the right or priv- ileges of being admitted to any premises for the purpose of attend- ing any event. It. PREMISES: "premises" includes any property, building, structure, enclosure, location or place, whether improved or not, and whether or not the same be owned by any individual person, firm association, group, or corporation upon which any event is con- ducted or at or from which any event may be attended. I. SEASON PASS: "season pass" means and includes every season ticket, season pass, passbook, club membership, membership card, association membership or insignia, or other device (other than a service pass), the ownership or possession of which entitles the owner or holder thereof to admission more than one time to any premise. 3.36.020 Imposition of Tax. There is hereby imposed a tax upon every patron who pays an admission price for admission to or for the privilege to attend, any event at any premises in the City. Said tax shall be at the rate of 10 percent (10 %) of the admission price. 3.36.030 Season Pass. If admission or attendance is under or by virtue of a season pass for which any admission price has been paid, the tax due thereon shall be paid and collected at the time place that such season pass is purchased. 3.36.040 Collection and Payment. The tax imposed by Section 3.36.020 shall be paid at the time when and the place at which the admission price is paid. Said tax shall be collected by the person charging for such admission. 3.36.050 Accounting and Payment to the City. On or before the 10th T,.y of earn month, any person required to collect the tax im- posed by Section 3.36.020 shall render (in duplicate) an accounting to the City of all such taxable admissions during the month preced- ing such accounting. Such accounting shall be filed with the Finance Director at the office of said director in the City Hall, and at the time of such filing the person collecting such tax shall then and there pay to the Finance Director all amounts so collected as taxes under this chapter, as shown in such accounting. The correctness of such accounting shall be subject to audit by the -. Finance Director or his authorized representatives, who are hereby authorized and empowered to inspect and audit the books and records of any and all persons subject to the provisions of this chapter: 3.36.060 Form of Return for Accountin . A. The forms of return to be -executed and filed pursuant to the requirements of this chapter shall be such as may be prescribed by or acceptable to the Finance Director. B. Such returns shall be dated, subscribed by the individual making the statement stating the capacity in which the sinner makes the same, and the signer shall certify under the penalty of perjury that the statements made therein are, to the best of his or her information, knowledge and belief, true and correct. 3.36.070 Alternate Procedure. Upon good cause shown, the City Council may, in its discretion, authorize a person recuired to collect the tax imposed by this chapter to file accountings, or pay over to the City taxes collected, or both, at a time or times or in a manner other than those specified in Section 3.36.050. 3.36.080 Failure to File Accountings or to Pay Over Tax. In case of failure; A. to file any accounting required by this chapter, on the date prescribed therefor, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to the amount required to be shown as tax on such account- ing ten percent (108) of the amount of such tax if the failure is for not more than one month, with an additional five percent (52) for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exceeding fifty percent (502) in the aggre- gate; B. to pay the amount shown as tax on any accounting specified in subsection A of this section on or before the date prescribed for payment of such tax, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause ana not d.e to willful neglect, there shall be added to the amount shown as tax on such accounting one percent (18) of the amount of such tax if the failure is for not more than one month, with an additional. one percent (18) for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exceeding fifty percent (50;) in the aggregate. 3.36.090 Interest. If any amount of tax imposed by Section 3.36.020 is not paid on or before the last date prescribed for pay- ment, interest on such amount at an annual rate of twelve percent - (12,) shall be paid for the period from the date prescribed for Payment to the date paid. 3.36.100 Willful Failure to Account or to Pav Over Tax. Any person required under this chapter to collect, account for, and t pay over any tax imposed by Section 3.36.020 who willfully fails to collect or truthfully account for and pay over such tax shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $500.00, or imprison in the county jail not more than six months, or both. 110 for and Section 3.36.020 and the operator of an event are jointly and severally liable to the City for the taxes required to be collected for such event, together with interest and penalties thereon. 3.36.120 Maintenance of Action. The City may maintain an action in anv court of competent jurisdiction to recover the amount of taxes required to he collected under the provisions of this chanter and for interest and penalties thereon, and in addition thereto the City may, if it is the prevailing party, may recover reasonable attorneys fees and its other costs of suit. 3. 36.130 Payment by Opera for in Lieu of Collectin Tax. The operator or an event, in lieu of collecting the tax imposed by this chapter from patrons of the event, may elect to pay the City an amount equal to ten percent (10 %) of the total admission price for such event. 3.36.140 Exemptions. This chapter shall not apply to: A. An event which is conducted or sponsored by corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and opera- ted exclusively for religious, charitable, or educational purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, and the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively to religious, charitable or educational purposes. B. An event conducted or sponsored for fund raising purposes by any political party recognized by the State, by any candidate for political office, or by any committee on behalf of such pol- itical party or candidate providing that the net proceeds from conducting such event are davn -mod solely to the benefit of such political party or for the el = ^`c�r. :_ such candidate. C. To the right or privilege to spark a motor vehicle where a charge is made through the use of a meter device and when such parking is upon a City Street or City owned parking lot. D. To an event which is conducted or sponsored by federal, state or local governmental entity. 3.36.140 Use of Proceeds. All taxes collected under the authority of this chapter shall be paid into the general fund of the City. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases to 1 or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional, then all other provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in the The Daily Report, a newspaper of general cir- culation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circu- lated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ` -- day of 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 0 i Mayor L-1 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1983 �d TO: City Council and City Manager 1917 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Vacation of the service road located on the south side of Foothill Blvd in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista Invest- ment The vacation of the frontage naad located on the south side of Foothill Blvd. west of Ramona Avenue is required prior to recordation of Parcel Map 6114. Vista Investment, developer of Parcel Map 6114, has requested additional time to submit the map for final approval. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for the frontage road vacation should be continued until May 4, 1983, as requested by the developer. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council continue the public hearing until May 4, 1983, at which time Parcel Map 6114 will be submitted for final approval. Respectfully submitted, as Attachment MMIWA C FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 0 aLLJ • m'W �Q al Bryn �LG IL? ILLi VACATION No. 0 -24 I �h a a� a > o, � P e"9.L1) An I Q W 0 QW It I 0 • 9 A f OTMv nc n n urvn OTTO n T,rnTTO n STAFF REPORT March 16, 1983 TO: City Manager and Members of City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager RE: Amendments to Ordinance 987 Creating an Advisory Commission to Act in an Advisory Capacity to the City Council and Planning Commission At its regular meeting of December 30, 1982, the Advisory Commission acted upon the City Council's recommendation to help formalize the structure of the Advisory Commission by appointing a chairman. The chairman would serve for one year and preside at Advisory Commission meetings. The City Council directed that the creation of a chairman be mandated by ordinance which necessitates a revision in the existing ordinance. In addition, the City Council directed staff to prepare language that would provide two year terms of office for new Advisory Commission members. These two recommended changes are incorporated into the attached revised ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend adoption of the attached revised ordinance to incorporate these modifications. JR:mk Attachment C.A.C. . -.. 4. Placement of trees would be approximately 25 -40 feet from structures. 5. !replacement of trees would not necessarily be in the same location of previous trees. A motion was made by Sharon Romero, seconded by Joe White and unanimously carried to support the proposed policy of eucalyptus windrows within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Glenn Rankin arrived at 7:35 p.m. and took his place at the commission table. 4B. APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN Discussion included: 1. Chairman of one community would be ineligible to be chairman the next year. 2. Chairman to rotate annually between the three communities with advice and consent of the commission 3. Formalize rotation in a CAC resolution, to be amended at a later date if necessary. 4. Chairman may act as CAC spokesperson to the Planning Commission and City Council. S. One year appointment to be made by CAC. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Don Baer, to adopt CAC rule by C resolution that annual chairman shall not come from the same community two years • in succession. Motion carried. Livia Valiance abstaining. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Joe White to adopt a resolution requesting City Council draft an ordinance stating the chairman of CAC shall hold office for a one year period with possible removal by same process. Motion carried. A recess was called at 7:55 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 8:02 p.m. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Joe White to nominate Sharon Romero for chairman. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Joe White, and carried unanimously to close the nominations and appoint Sharon Romero as chairman, effective January 27, 1033 for the calendar year. 5. NI:W BUSINESS. Sharon Romero inquired as to the progress of the proposed civic center. Jim Robinson replied there had been a groundbreaking ceremony for the county Foothill Law and Justice Center. The city recently made the second and final payment and now owns the land. The City Council is now studying the potential methods available to finance the civic center. Joe White requested the commission direct stalf look into a possible anti- business position of the city. Also that Jeff Seeranka, Chamber of Commerce Director, be • invited to tho CAC meeting in February to respond to this concern. �n /r. r Cily R.,aa . ::.,t_I Ae.:.: L i!1. _n ^:.S:P Ii1,T •C\ n,' r!!.K::: -; Tn rp,p::h;;:CC Cn. 31, LITd;a.:::!I If::: TIII:,,I /: IF., 'i \item tbv n ,f the mport, Covnclln.u+ 4ugaat a .ed . IS.b in.un In tell tile eachal c rn 5 }Ir. R.hinson .'need the Advisory Cot ris iu.m ....med rai r i eras as folhlwl : +.a• f 114 l. ++ u (-malice ch, .a'mo'ur. of the :Advisory C„mmission which mull r. can to a Anoint a chni .... :wn iron each of she c nit Aes an Cmrc would be esp on siSillo: within each c +icy fora individual to take cbarga and organize that ,union. of the ,Advisory Commission. Perhaps also a chair - persn be appointed fez the entire Commission. L Encourage eonmunication between the Advisory Commission ntndcrs and with the rest of the community. Members should be encouraged to participate outside of the Advisory Commission meetings by possibly attending Council meetings, Planning Commission meetings, and being involved in ocher c n ra vitice in order to become ote kvledgeable to improve [heir input t0 she Advic.,, Commission. 7. Felt it essential that city oCarroil appoint a delegate to the Advia.ry Cc,I,ission to attend their meetings and to act as a liaison between the city '.Omit and the advisory commission. d. Commission also discussed ways in which to get more community involvement with the Advisory Commission, 5. They encouraged chamber of comssrem exposure. • 6. Encouraged that the amps of the activities be broadened. ). Felt it ui- port.o�nt uthat the Advisory Commission appoint a dclecaceu to the cis: council s would be at council meetings and to a co the flow Of cammvaication. g. Peru.,. establish a more formal attendance policy. 9. Change meeting schedule, perhaps meet every other month or even quarterly so that agendas could be more concentrated. 10. Perhaps expansion of the role of the ,Advisory Commission. 11. Change in tern of office; perhaps four year term is too long, B yor aikele opened the resting for public comments. There being none, the meeting was closed for further public comments. Councilcan Schlosser stated he would lips to keep the Adviaory Coemissian, but the question vas how do we keep them busy. One 'hill, he would like to add would be to have a critique made by the Advisory Commission of the Connctl. He felt the changes recomendad were exeel.lent and should be incorporated. Councllran C.+hl agreed that the scope of their attivitra could be broadened, exDOSare to is ,. ,[unity and ch.umber, etc. were inpnrtant. He stated that it s mad that there vas +I b1,.kd,ol in rommunioation5 between ehe council and planning - coloissi.c. I ten often tle•ir recnm,rnd.afnn. are taken lightly. he felt it would he interesting I` to s n 1111 the otha+r two Com^I nitics Iookrtl at ch, :tlw:mJa Spadfic Plan. Ile was oPPnvnJ cu tie cap ens inn of the ,Advisory Comiisaion to combine it will the Parks and Trail.: Comm Lssion Ile felt the Parks Commission was n highly techolenl cemmis.i.m while the Advisory Comntselon v a more gonural organization to give a e general I-'O Y input while ehu Parksand Trails C,,nrisslon would be or focused. N.1,.1 Nikel, asked if the Advisory Cnrumiasion had a11eaa to the City Cmme11 Agendas' flr. Hobic,,o scat rd chat they wore maflcd copies of the agendas. :Iaynr 4lkels stated 11-11 the' had ccusz to all irons whi h were to be dLernased by Council then Ind could In" "tu discussion en choir ran if Lhev 'I Jvufred, Pt. Robins...at ... I that mitt the G1C wm11J ICSIre is to -lava ,nt Increased nnaber Ii lions forwarded t0 them l a: nil p' for ,:ens lJaantlon s. mayor Hikels stated that regarding the (. tnalisn Han of the Coro.l es ion, they could C ltn r.,.. nc 1: ': e Anent - rage II" Mr, lilkeln iced that '•!ne thev take actton u a reea_1endatiur, A.W, her ell frun -the AJvt are C motes Wo that the :b':o[ respond nn balmlf of It.. rn'm -ii ..<- pla4ning em Cua.gWi aetien. Nr. Fro;:t sta,od that he disagreed with this:. I,e felt this would he in .i litinnel hurA.•n on the staff, and Yon may . nav not atiorucly reflect the nnad of tS„ get iny. Ile felt that par[ of the role of tlm Cl"Irperaon vou1J he to aCU•:d the Council aeetimgs and that through ocher -iochanfwv which will be dises.aed later that more coueeilmembers will he *[tending the CAC meetings. He felt chat va.a sufficient. Motion: Moved by Schlosser that a spokesman from the Commission he a - d to communicate with each city council member. ye vote vas taken, but s s the con - census of the Council to (ncludo this as a function of the Chairperson, 1 Anpoin[ Clty Council Dele¢a[e ee Adv4sory Commix ton: Mr. FM n[ augic sled [hat Instead of appointing a delegate that individual councilnmmbers try to mare It to more of the CAC meetings. Council concurred. i. Advteery Cmatsstan B.n•asore to Community: Council concurred with the reeom- mealarlan that the Commission's role and activities be more publicized in arEcr to encourage citizen participation and create a general awareness of the importance of the Cumul S¢n. S. Chamber of Commerce lsnosure: Council concurred that the CtaMet of Cccnerca ceded to become mere cognisant of Commission activities and their role in the cammu i", b, Broaden Sumo of Cemmisatan Aettvities: Ca ... il concurred that this item �d be fumed back to [he CAC for [hen to came up with a list of items they wanted to have [.reed ever to them. y. Delegate(%) to fi[v Councilt Council concurred that the Chaim-am wonid act as the dele,ta sad spokesman to the Cicy Council. Council also disecii the following items listed an Mr. Robinson's memo dated July 70, 1981 to the City Council and included in the agenda packet: a - A. AtranJance Policy: Consensus of council was that council would keep a closer eye on the attendance, but to continue i,ueor policy to let the Commission police timatilves. a, ar ins ion of :keclne Poli v: Cua.cdl state ... d to leave this as it is currently, meeting t.." ..... ... ........... at etch month with the •sceptlon of summer recess. C. Unta.n,ifc, of ,tdv4sary Curia tzs4en :wle: Council skipped to case bark later. D. Terms of affirm: Council directed staff to came back jth reeclowedatlon cm how to ¢horn live year mane and to n[`otar [hem. ••'um R. r.l t,rr r• Sr�,�b• . -•i _t.n "nly: Council ra.Oarr,d that 1t 'a :.t try to anpunt .uttoe o ace mil ale actually doing the process•ac this •meeting. L C. Fy nxLm of the Ro lu of \AVlsory Cnmmtsa ion: Council concurred [hue I,,,, C wo old not Im.roc• [o M1e In the nrJ Leann•. Tlmv (d l[ that if Council •Ir e.,,a to for- vaW An i,vm to the Gommhss wn our di: :uas hen. [le n [hey vuald, They Jhl not feel d:a CAC vhanld h.ndtu Ill. Parka and Troll' (lattice, Via,. mold be an formal sh1n, in mho role of thu ,Wvlaw,y Commission. 5A. rnnsttymgtoA ro, Fmk UTtoY M A FAPKg .1:.T TRAt1.5 C.•CI[SdiO!t. After mach dletusion and several attempts at farmala,ing a Orion, m tie• fiellw". lag ;:ul Wn va:: mam• and a,,, —ad: gotien: :'nerd by Dahl. .,,an,! I by Front to reque,t ,a off to prepare a Jogunon[ lot the c ua Uan of n perk, AAVi -nr•• r• - -Lem inn r.. „ac ,', an SePVmbvr 1, 1983. Nutt.. ca•riN uaansously 5 -0. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, -- CALIFORNIA, A14ENDING SECTIONS 2.28.040 AND 2.28.070 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO TERMS OF APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS AND OFFICERS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 2.28.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2.28.040. Membership- -Terms of Appointment. "All terms shall be for two (2) years. If a vacancy shall occur, other than by expiration of term of office, it shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor with the approval of the council for the unexpired term. Any member appointed to a fe.:r (4) year term prior to the 1983 amendment to this section may serve out the remainder of such four (4) year term." SECTION 2: Section 2.28.070 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal • Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2.28.070. Officers. "A. The Advisory Commission shall select a chairperson to preside at all meetings of the commission. The term of the chairperson shall be one (1) year, commencing on January 1 of each year. The chairperson may be removed by majority vote of the entire Advisory Commission, taken at any regular meeting thereof, in the event a chairperson is removed prior to the expiration of his or her term, the Advisory Commission shall forthwith appoint a successor to serve the balance of the unex- pired term." SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at .least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulate:', in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1983. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of AYES: NOES: AHSDNT: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK . ORDINANCE N0, 97 AN ORDINANCC Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF "SMO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, CMiTING AN ADVISORY CO!LYISSION TO ACT 18 AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO ME CITY COCNCIi. AND PLANNING COINISSION. r 1 Tbt Cit, Cnnne,i of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, data Iordain na fall...: SECTION l: There is hereby created and established In the city an Advisory Commission. Pole of Advisory carmission SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission shall act In an advisory capacity to the City Council and Planning Commission on ,vanity issues and perform such other advisory functions as may be delegated to the Advisory Commission from time to time by the Planning Commission or City Council. a,,.irc, shall be recorded in the minutes of the Caw, ncil meeting. Advi ory Commission Membership SECTION 3: The Advisory Committee shall consist of a total Of fifteen (15) members with five (5) appointed from each of the three (3) geographic s designated by rip rode in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, namely Alta Lome (91701), Cucamonga (91])0), and Etivanda (93))9). Members of the Advisory Commission shall be residents of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be appointed by the City Council. The Mayor shall submit to the Council the name of any person proposed for appointment to the Advisory Commission and upon such appointment by the Council, the n of the a,,.irc, shall be recorded in the minutes of the Caw, ncil meeting. • I Tens of Appointment SECTION 4: The fifteen (15) members of the Advisory CeraL4alon initially appointed shall determine the length of their to ms by lot. Thereafter all terms shall be for four (4) years. Three (3) members fton each of the three subcommittees (Alta Loma), (Cucamonga), and (Etivanda) shall serve A term of four (4) years and shall continue until their respective Lerms expire unless acu,aer removed as provided in this Ordinance. Two (2) members from each of the three (3) subcommittees shall serve a term of two (2) years and shall continue in office until ,heir respr¢ive c spi, u removed as provided In this o ;other ord innnce. if n shall than by Papfrotion of the term of office, it shall be filled by appointment by he Mayor with the a , toval of ibe Council for the eusnpi,ed ff vembe's ,tm Zhu Adet ... y Comm LSSinn nay he removed At Any time ay a maiorfty vote of the City Council. In addition, the Adviser, Car -1 =_Ten may ter ... end t. the City Cuuneil removal of any membrr Of the Advi.ary Cnrmi oleo who has ufnlated n meeting, attendance policies dm: may 'ue earnhlished by resolution. L R., 111 •: ••.rr SECTION b: The dater upon which and the hour and pInce at which any regular mamba; shall he held shall he fixed by resolution or minoto ate ton of the City Cnune il. O(flee's SECTIII :): fath ele,urmitl,r at the Advisory Conmission shall select a tmmairpa rs nn [a p,Edt at recut¢ meetings on a monthly rotating hash. • J � / Minare. SECTION B: The Secretary of the Comisslon shall cause the minutes f regular, adjourned r.gu tar, and special meetings to be kept; and shall, a s possible after each nee ri ng. cause a copy of the minces to be for,arded to each meuber of the Ccesission and to the City Clerk. The Ctty Clerk or designco will serve ,as secretary for he Aev is.ry Caean(s,ion. SECTION 99: The Mover shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall .tees[ to the s and the City Clerk shall c e the sane to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least o e in Th u Dally Bepnrt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated Sn he city of Earth. Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 11th day of October, 1979 AYES: Sent mser, Nikals, Pal.adn. Bridge, Frost NOES: Yen. ABSENT: Nona NiYOi ATTEST: City Clerk 11 0 1! 1 u 0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer ktc L IF, SUBJECT: Request for Waiver of Street Improvements- Steven R. Sensebach- Residential Remodel Attached is a letter from Mr. Steven Sensenbach to waive the provision of Ordinance No. 58 requiring street improvements for residential additions exceeding 650 square feet. (See Section 12.08.050 of attached Municipal Code.) The proposed addition will add 1,792 square feet clearly falling within the provision of the Code. In the past, Council has always upheld the provision of th Ordinance but allowed lien agreements for future construction where sufficient justification exists for delaying improvements. In this case where surrounding lands are undeveloped and subject to extensive improvements in the future, it would seem appropriate to delay improvement for construction with surrounding development. Staff mould, therefore, support a request to delay the improvements subject to execution of a lien agreement by the applicant. This option has been presented to the applicant and rejected. The applicant has expressed his desire and thrust of his appeal is complete waiver of improvements. The provisions of Ordinance No. 58 (Municipal Code Chapter 12.08) do not provide for this eventuality. If the Council should wish to grant this appeal, it would require either amendment of the Code or a reduction of Sierra Vista to a special design street of its current configuration. Staff would recamena neicner of these options. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council deny the appeal and iiphold the provisions of Ordinance No. 58 by requiring that either the improvements be installed or that a lien agreement be executed to guarantee future construction. Resp c ul ly LBH:j Attachments 42 ^(, 12.08.010 -- 12.08.020 B. Any person violating any of the provisions of sub- sections A, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, L, N or 0 of Section 12.04.010, after having been once advised that such activit^ is unlawful, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be ounisted by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months or fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or by hot: such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 85 352, 3, 1979). Chanter 12.08 DEDICATION OF RIGHT- OF -9IAY Sec ions: 12.08.010 Declaration of need. 12.08.020 Streets and highways -- Dedication requirement. 12.08.030 Offer of dedication. 12.08.040 Construction of public improve^ents--Reauire- ments. 12.03.050 Construction of public improvements--Excep- tions. 12.09,060 Construction of public improvements--Additicnal requirements. 12.08.070 Construction agreement. 12.08.080 City standards. 12.08.090 No encroachment withcut permit. 12.03.010 Declaration of need. The lac: of full £rohtage improvements adjoining a lot or parcel occupied or to be occupied by a building, structure or parking lot is found and declared to be hazardous for pedestrians and veh'_cular traffic and detrimental to the health, safety and pereral welfare of the residents of the city. (Ord. 58 51, 1979). 12.08.020 Streets and highways -- Dedication requirements. No building or structure shall be erected, enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be improved for parking purposes, and no building permit shall be issued therefor, unless one -half of the street, which is located on the same side of the centerline of the street as such lot, has dedicated right -of -wa for the full width of the lot along all street frontages so as to meet the master plan and /or standards for such street. In addition to required dedication for street purposes, additional dedication for storm drain, sewer, water or other utility purposes may also be required in connection with building permits adhere such dedication is necessary to prevent the flooding of adiacent or nearby properties or to permit connection to required utilities. (Ord. 58 52, 1979). 149 12.06.030 -- 12.08.060 12.08.030 Offer of dedication. in the event construc- tion o: rull frontage improvements is not immediately required, ar.y person required to dedicate land by this section shaft make an irrevocable offer to dedicate property, executed by all parties having an interest in the property including beneficiaries and trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current preliminary title report prepared by a title company approved by the city engineer. Such offer of dedication shall be in a form approved by the city attorney and the city engineer, and shall continue in effect until the city council accepts or rejects such offer. (Ord. 58 53, 1979). meats. Any person, owner, lessee, or agent constructing or arranging for the construction of any parking lot or cocmer- cial, residential or industrial building, or buildings, or building addition or alteration, shall provide for the construction or installation to city standards, of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving to the centerline of the street, and necessary drainage structures unless such improvements already exist along all street frontages adjoining the lot on which the building or parking lot is to be constructed, enlarged or altered. (Ord. 58 54, 1979). 12.08.050 Construction of public improvements--Excee- The provrsrons or Section 12.08.090 shall not acply A. Alterations; B. Reconstruction; C. An addition to a single family resiAPnco vhon fHo -- D. Construction of garages, carports, storage buildings, patio covers, swi=ing pools, spas, and similar structures, accessory to a single family residence. (Ord. 56 -A 51, 1979: Ord. 58 55, 1979). 12. o8. obo Construction - -11C imorcl- Pments -- Additional Teq�i remCnCS. A. Except as provided in �ectlon 12.oe.o50, the building official shall deny issuance of a building permit, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility connections to anv building or parking lot until recurred full frontage improvements exist, or are constructed or their construction is guaranteed by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the city in a sum approved by the city engineer based upon one - and- one -half times the estimated cost of construction. B. In the event construction of full frontage improve- ments is not required to be completed within six months after the issuance of the building permit, the city engineer may, at his option, require that a lien upon the property to be improved be created by contract between the owner and the 150 C_ 0 12.08.070 -- 12.08.090 city as security for the performance by the owner of the construction guarantee agreement instead of a cash decosit. In the event a lien agreement is required pursuant to't'i s section, no building permit shall he issued until the lien agreement is recorded in the office of the county recorder of San Bernardino county. (Ord. 58 -B §1, 1930: Ord. 58 §6, 1979) 12.08.070 Construction agreement. The construction guarantee agreement shall be effective on the date of the deposit of cash and shall end upon the date of completion to the satisfaction of the city engineer of all improvenents recuired to be made. Upon completion of the improvenents and their acceptance by the city, the cash denosit shall be returned to the owner. The city is authorize-a', in the event of any default, to use any or all of the deposit money to cause all of the required work to be done or completed, and for payment of all costs and expenses therefor. Any money remaining shall be refunded to the owner. (Ord. 58-§7, 1979). 12.08.080 Cit standards. The city engineer is authorized to estab ish standards for the construction and installation of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving and storm drain structures. (Ord. 58 58, 1979). 12.00.090 No encroachment without permit. No building, structure or parking lot shall be erec_ed, eniarced or altered if it does, or would, encroach upon any public easement or right -of -way unless an encroachment permit is first obtained from the city engineer. The city engineer may grant an encroachment permit if he determines that the encroachment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. (Ord. 58 §9, 1979). Chanter 12.12 STREET NAMING Sections: 12.12.010 Purpose of provisions. 12.12.020 Naming criteria. 12.12.030 New streets. 12.12.040 Changing street names--Reasons, 12.12.050 Changing street names -- Process. 151 (Rancho Cucamonga 1 /82) �4 12.12.010 -- 12.12.020 12.12.010 Purpose of provisions. Street names may be changed pursuant to the following: A. That the proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the general plan; B. That the proposed change is consistent with the ' adopted master plan of-streets and highways or adopted circu- lation element; C. That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment; D. That the proposed change is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. (Ord. 144 S5, 1981). 12.12.020 Naming criteria. Streets shall be named as follows: A. Street names should be pleasant sounding, appropriate, easy to read (so that the public, and children in particular, can handle the name in an emergency situation), and should add to the pride of home ownership and community. B. The following types of street names are unacceptable: numerical names (1st, 2nd, etc.); alphabetical letters (A, B, C, etc.); frivolous, complicated or undesirable names; uncon- ventional spelling; compound names; given or surnames of persons living or dead (Pioneer families, historic persons, etc., excluded). C. Streets which are continuous shall be extended in accordance with the present street names wherever oossible and feasible. D. Discontinuous streets shall not be given the same name. E. Duplication of existing or proposed street names is prohibited. Similar sounding names are considered to be duplication, regardless of spelling. F. Existing areas of the city shall strive to have new street names consistent with the prevailing theme of north/ south streets named after gems and east /west streets named after trees when possible and where feasible. G. Streets with a .n in. _• - _ =:ree or more change of direction shall change names= - :venient and appropriate point as determined by the city planner. H. That street designation for present and future streets shall be as follows: 1. Boulevard. Special east -west streets shall be named "Boulevards "; 2. Streets. East -west streets to be named "Streets "; 3. Avenues. North -south streets to be named "Avenues "; 4. Road. Any diagonal street which does not conform basically to grid to be known as "Roads "; 5. Drive. East -west streets parallel to, but between named streets, to be called "Drives"; (Rancho Cucamonga 1/82) 152 yvi"(J`2G r' ` , "VINEYARD `National `Bank February 23, 1923 Jon D. Mikels Mayor Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mayor Mikels: I'am in the process of attempting to finalize and receive approval for a large addition to my residence which is located on Red Hill in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Thus far all members of the staff within the City have been very helpful and infact as of this date If I agree to one condition which I'am presently opposing then infact the plans will be approved and a building Permit can be issued. I'am requesting that the City Council waive, Council Ordinance t'58, which deals with offsite improvements where more than 640 sq.ft • are being added to an existing dwelling. In my particular case we are adding approximately 1792 sq.ft. which is a second story addition to our home, located at the end of Sierra Vista Drive. The street in itself, as are many on Red Hill, is of a rural nature and does not have curbs, gutters, sidewalks and so forth. What the City is asking me to do is make these improvements now or sign a statement to the fact that in the future, I will at my expense, make said improvements. If infact I make the improvements which are being requested we would be the only home on our street that had a curb or a gutter in front of it. On December 10, 1980 the City Planner approved a project calling for the development of 4.42 acres of land (copy attached) which is to the South and East of my property. The project has never gone any further, however in discussing the plans with the surveyor at the time the original application was approved, it was explained to me that the developer of that land would he responsible for upgrading both Sierra Vista itself and meeting the requests for cm'bu, gutters, and sidewalks on all parcels adjacent thereof. ' P.O. BOX 721 '81 SO VINEYARD AVENUE RANCHO CUC AMC NGA. CALIFORNIA 81730 • • 8' ' -,'?~. a.�^ r v.... .. ._..... ., .1'' .. ..... (71x)987 -0V7 Mayor Mikels 2 February 23, 1983 You will find enclosed various pictures of the front of my residence. The photos clearly indicate that there are no improvements to the street and infact the street itself is in great need of repair. I would appreciate you reviewing my request and if rccessary taking it before the City Coucil and requesting a waiver of the condition. If you do not agree, I would like the opportunity to discuss it with you personally. Since this problem is holding up the issuance of our permit I would appreciate an early reply. Ver ,Truly Yours, en nsenbac President Enclosures SRS:cc r� U • • ✓ X11 .' 1'r.�. 1 ♦ v�.�.�. 35 Q 1 �x.t f iJ v w 0 • u • i Date: To: Fron: By: Subject: I December 10, 1980 Planning Commission L. CITY Of RAKCI-10 CI:G \VOXGA STAFF REPORT Barry K. Hogan, City Planner Michael Vairin, Senior Planner / / EIlV1 RON9ENTAL ASSESSI ^.ENT AND TENTATIVE TRACTT NO. 11563 - RED HILL PARTNERS - A custom lot subdivision on 4. 2 acres of land y�nto 12 single family residential lots in the R -1 -12 zone, to Sted on th e.east and west sides of Sierra Vista, orth of Red 11 Country Club Drive - APN 207- 082 -01 and 207 - 411 -10 BAC'KGROU I'D : The applicant is requesting review and approval of a residential subdivision of 4.42 acres of land into 12 lots. The project site is located on Sierra Vista Avenue, just north of Red Hill Country Club Drive (Exhibit "A "). The site is presently zoned R -1- 12,000 thus permitting the development of single family residential dwellings on minimum 12,000 square foot lots. The site is presently vacant and undeveloped and contains mature trees throughout. The surrounding zoning and land use is of a single family residential charac- ter. The Interim General Plan designates this area as low density residential at 2 -5 dwelling units per acre and the proposed General Plan designates the project site as low density residential at 2 -4 dwelling units per acre. The project has been reviewed by the Growth Management Review Committee as a custom lot subdivision in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance, and has received the minimum threshold point limit, thus eligible for consideration of approval by the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS: The tentative map has been prepared in accordance with the State Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The lot sizes, widths, and depths are in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The size and shape a, the lots are adequate to accommodate the placement of a dwelling unit within the required set -back provisions. Access to the tract will be from the extension of Sierra Vista to Red Hill Country Club Drive and a new cul -de -sac. Monte Vista Drive, which is adjacent to the cast boundary line of the project site will not be used as main access to the site but will be required to be improved in accordance with the City's standard alley design. Ilo perimeter landscaped parkways will be created as a result Of this subdivision. The only required landscaping for this subdivision will be street trees in accordance with the City's street tree policy. There are several existing trees located throughout the site of which will not be affected by the installa- tion of street improvements. It is recommended that these trees be retained and so designated on the final grading plan. ITEM "I" Environmental Assessm �c and Tentative Tract No. 11563 ` Page 2 • This development has been submitted as a custom lot subdivision and has therefore not submitted specific site plans or building designs. Should the developer decide to develop this subdivision as a tract, then sub- mission of required site plans and building designs will be required prior to issuance of building permits. Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. The staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation and has found no significant adverse impacts upon the environment as a result of this project. It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for this project. CORRESPONDENCE: A Tentative Tract Map was advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper. To date, no correspondence has been received for this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive public input. If, after such hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. Re ectful y s fi''Dtted, ARP. .. HO ity Tanner BKH:14V:nm Attachments: Exhibit "A ", Location Map Exhibit "B ", Tentative Tract Map Part I, Initial Study Resolution of Approval J • �` v /` IV r % KnRTH CI "I'1' OF rrr.\r -11563 RANCI IO CUCAMO NGA TITLE: L.C�MIMAP PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT; A SCALE: A1S5 '4s1— 1 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11563 ' J 44 IN ThE C I FY OF RANCHO CO. r. 3 r 4z- T'. I j ..TAI �Cl e, 'RAN.0 a mm L RESOLUTION NO. 80-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COI<71ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11563. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11563, hereinafter submitted by Red Hill Partners, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 4.42 acres located on Sierra Vista, north of Red Hill Country Club Dr. and being divided into 12 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on December 10, 1950; and 14HEREAS, the City Planner has reco7mended approval of the `lap subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHERcAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NN, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: • SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the folloning findings in regard to Tentative Tract ';o. 11563 and the ?Ian thereof: I 1 (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all apnlicabla interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental darane and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easermnt acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. 80- 79 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the • environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION Z: Tentative Tract Map No. 11563, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Plannino Division Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall he submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or . will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Developmen t. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 3. All slope banks in =,cess of five (5) feet in vertical height snail and ar. 1 or Creator slopes be landscaped and irrigaLed in accordance wit'n slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and apnrooriato shrubs and treos. All such planting and irr- igar.ian snr.11 be _ontinucusiy maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Officit& Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to Ir germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. �. n Resolution 80. 8(79 Page 3 • 4. This subdivision was not submitted as a total developzent package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth lianacement Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation o` map if the subdivision is going to he developed as tract homes. 5. This approval shall become null and void if the final subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 6. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 7. Existing trees are to be retained where street inprove -ents • do not occur. The final grading plan shall accurately indicate the location and that they are to be retained. 8. The slopes along the west property line of lots 9, 10, and 11 shall be eliminated in favor of a retaining wall. Engineering Division • 9. Dedication cf right -of -way for Sierra Vista Drive, shall be 60 feet wide (30' each side of the centerline of t n street) with 15 feet radial at property corners at the intersection of Sierra Vista Drive and Red Hill Co „ntry Club Drive. 30. The proposed storm drain shall he 24” minimum R.C.P. centered on 12' wide dedicated easements. 11. The applicant shall contact and make arrangements with adjacent property owners to dispose of the surplus land beyond 60' wide required right -of -way for the portion of Sierra Vista Drive from Red Hill Country Club Drive to the first lots of the tract. 12. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Enginsiur's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 13. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 14. Existing City road requiring reconstruction, shall remain open for traffic at all times with adequate detours during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of the grading and paving prior to recordation of the tract map. On completion of the gradino and paving, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the cash deposit shall be refunded. l Resolution No. 80 -19 Page 4 • 15. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and • disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 16. Letters of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from the tract flo::s onto . private properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1980. PLXMMG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: Ricnard Dahl, Chair an ATTE S —: ���� • V jff/ J Secretary of the Planning Cormission I, dACh LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of tha City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cc" ssicn held on the 10th day of December, 1930 by the following vote to -•wi t: AYES: MNMISSIONERS: Rem"! , Tolstoy, Kino, Sceranka, Dahl NOES: XMISSIONERS: None ABSEIT: CO"11ISSlONERS: None �Y� 0 0 C� J ILI s, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM; Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Storm Damage Status Report - Consultant Selection r'�GNfo" tC C9 > 197; Attached for Council review is the most recent update on public improvement damages caused by the recent storms. During the past two weeks, we have focused our efforts in making sufficient interim repairs to reopen all streets in the City to provide additional time to plan the final repairs. All of that work should be complete by the time of the City Council meeting. Attached is a contract with L. D. King Engineering to provide engineering services in the design and contract documents to allow informal bidding on the final repairs. L. D. King was selected because of their experience is disaster funding pro- cedures and their recent work on the design of Hellman Avenueand Foothill Blvd, intersection and drainage improvements. As you know, the major damages occurred to Hellman Avenue. Rather than affect only the repair of immediate damage, we have requested that the consultant prepare an options report that would remove bottlenecks along the street and make more extensive improvements to minimize future problems along the street, Much of this work would blend well with the budgeted Foothill and Hellman Project. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the contract with L. D. King Engineering to provide engineering services for storm damage repair. Respectfully submitted, Attachment 0 • S — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner v�O GVCAMO� SUBJECT: UPDATE ON STATUS OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN /REQUEST TO SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE Last month the Planning Commission completed its review of the Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan and recommended approval of the Plan with revisions to the City Council. Staff is now in the process of revising the Plan text, maps, and the Environmental Impact Report. As soon as the revisions are completed, staff will distribute the documents to the Council for your review and consideration. We anticipate distribution of the revised documents to the Council by March 31. The Specific Plan contains proposed policies and regulations which will pose a number of development - related issues in Etiwanda. Consequently, it is suggested that a special meeting be set aside on Monday, April 11, 1983, to discuss the Etiwanda plan and to hold a public hearing. The City Council can then decide whether another special meeting will be necessary to complete the review of the plan. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council set a public hearing to be held on Monday, April 11, 1983 at 7:00 p.m., to discuss the Etiwanda Specific Plan, related General Plan Amendment, and Environmental Imoact Report in accordance with the attached schedule. fitted, Jack Lam, Director of Community Deve JL:OK:jr Attachment: Tentative Council Review Schedule F 19i7 1 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON STATUS OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN /REQUEST TO SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE Last month the Planning Commission completed its review of the Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan and recommended approval of the Plan with revisions to the City Council. Staff is now in the process of revising the Plan text, maps, and the Environmental Impact Report. As soon as the revisions are completed, staff will distribute the documents to the Council for your review and consideration. We anticipate distribution of the revised documents to the Council by March 31. The Specific Plan contains proposed policies and regulations which will pose a number of development - related issues in Etiwanda. Consequently, it is suggested that a special meeting be set aside on Monday, April 11, 1983, to discuss the Etiwanda plan and to hold a public hearing. The City Council can then decide whether another special meeting will be necessary to complete the review of the plan. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council set a public hearing to be held on Monday, April 11, 1983 at 7:00 p.m., to discuss the Etiwanda Specific Plan, related General Plan Amendment, and Environmental Imoact Report in accordance with the attached schedule. fitted, Jack Lam, Director of Community Deve JL:OK:jr Attachment: Tentative Council Review Schedule ETIWANDA: TENTATIVE COUNCIL REVIEW SCHEDULE DATE: MEETING: April 11: (Monday) Special Council Meeting 1. Staff presentation - Brief overview of Specific Plan progress - Overview of Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and EIR 2. Public hearing /Input - Take all comments - Identify issues 3. Council direction /Questions for staff • May 4 ' Regular Council Meeting 1Wednesday) 1. Staff review of issues 2. Public hearing 3. Council direction * (In lieu of the May 4th Regular Council :meeting, the Council may wish to hold another special meeting if a substantial amount of public discussion remains necessary. Staff would suggest Monday, April 25th or Monday, May 9th as alternate dates.) ,'E f� 0 9 U MEMORANDUM 1d February 28, 1983 jF, = - -' T0: City Manager and Members of the City Council FKX: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager OVXZ RE: Fireworks Issues /Advisory Commission Recommendations At its last mcetin�; the Advisory Commission "formalized" its reccmaendat_o•n.s to the City Council regarding suggested improvements to the City's existing fireworks policies. An excerpt of the Commission minutes outlining its recoxm^_ndaticrs is attached for your review. At Mayor Mikels' request these• recc:.- endationz will be presented at the March 16, 1983, City Council meeting. In sumrary, the following is a synopsis of Advisory Commission recommendations to improve the City's existing policy relating to the sale of safe and sane fireworks. Sale and Use of Fireworks 1. ..,. enforcement against sale to minors. Current City ._nance li78 prohibits sale to minors under 16 years of a�,e s accompanied by parent or guardian. It has been reported that groups with stands have not adhered to the policy that prevents sale to minors. 2. Stricter enforcement of use of illegal fireworks. The Firp fducrict has suggested setting up a hot -line along the lines oI a 'RJe Tip" operation for citizens to inform the enforcement agencies of the location of illegal fireworks being discharged or misuse of safe and sane firn::ors. Publ. Re ]a bons /4:ducatio❑ e and Sanc Fireworkc iviucetional programs to minors and parents who use safe and nano fireworks to h^ established by Fire Diotrict with support f ^...'� the City. 2. Ut.iline "Iluighborhood Watch" groups and their newsletter for Fireworks safety awareness programs. Part of the June tlgiT,hborhood Watch program meeting should be utilized for fireworks safety awarene..ns. Continued.... Fireworks Issues /Advisory Commission Recommendations February 28, 1993 Page 2 3• Public education through newspapers, Grapevine, etc., on existing high fire hazard areas where all fireworks are prohibited and the proper use of sparklers (which cause an unnecessary number of injuries because of misuse). Use of F z Generated From Fireworks Sales In summary (see attached minutes). 1. Continue to insure fireworks revenues remain in Rancho Cucamonga. 2. Req•,:ire each group to provide a list of projects to be accomplished with fireworks revenues. 3. List of completed projects due from each group at the end of the calendar year. 4. Non- profit tax reports required. Group Rli;ibilit, The Advisory Commission did not make any specific recommendations regarding group eli3 ibility. The commission felt that stricter evaluation of proposed ans actual use of funds generated from fireworks sales would do more to insure app.cprista use of these funds. While it may still be appropriate to etards to general purpose service club organizations, any restriction would probably be met with strong opposition. (See attached memo). Some of these groups have been on the list 3 -4 years and have not yet secured a stand. These groups would probably provide the strongest opposition. Conclusion I w411 ba ^o nt .ct in,g the City Courc it on an individual basis to respond to any questions or concerns regardin. the fir ^wor'cz is =!s prior to the ?larch 16, 1983 c.ectir.4. J R:-.k Attachment:; 0- r 7 n� 0 I CITY OF RANChIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C 10: Advisory Commission FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager RE: it.tvj3ory Commission Recommendations Regarding Sale of Safe and Sane F4.. 3works At its meeting of December 2, 1982 the Advisory Commission requested t ,_ staff devaiep formalized recommendations regarding policy changes affecting the sale -1 and sane fireworks. These formalized recommendations ::.,,._❑ then be reviesed, modified etc., and forwarded to the City Council for t.._ -. ccnsider,ticn. The fo'- lowieg represents those key issues previously discussed by t.",=_ Ad,`sery Cer .issicn and a "formalization" of those recommendations. (1) Nu:nher of Fireworks Stands. ?crjod!cally the City receive, requests to increase_ the nu: -.ier of au2-rized stands. Current city pclicy _ztabllshed C -used in March of 1979 allows one stands` per 10,070 pcpulation. The Advisory Commission has requested that the C;.ty continue with the existing policy and that an addit!cna'_ booth not be created until the population reaches 60,000. (2) p;i;!:C Education on Use. rf Safe and Sane Firaxor::o. Th: following represents a synopsis of ideas previously dcrc•uz.ed by the Co :mission to improve the public's safety awareness in the use and discharge of safe and sane fireworks. a. That reaps, approved by the Fire District, be posted in conspicuous places on all firaaoKcs stands, clearly dclincatin,^ tiie location of Ri;;h Fire Hazard Areas and ren :indinO citizen3 that , "11 (ine iudiug ^aro an;: ss ; :c fireworks), are prohibited in these areas. It has also been suggested that small maps be available over the countor with each sale. b. It has been su, ?gested by several Advisory Commission m_-born that "a,4arer•ess" programs in the schooie be initiated to educate children in the co%iunity of the � 9 Advisory Co=ission Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks Page 2 proper use of safe and sane fireworks. The Rancho Cucamonga Junior Women's Club has already expressed an interest in assisting in implementation of such a program. It is staff's opinion that safety awareness would have to be an on -going project of one motivated service club /organization or several. Fireworks sales /safety normally is a subject that is popular when the group is up for a stand that year, but quickly diminishes when the organization rotates to the bottom of the list. Additionally, school contact is important, however use of safe and sane fireworks is well after the end of the school year, and awareness programs should also be directed towards the general public and the adults who actually purchase the fireworks. (No one under 18 years of age is allowed to purchase fireworks). Increased publicity regarding the proper use of safe and sane fireworks could be directed through the suer "Grapevine" newspaper articles, (distributed in June) and "awareness" information made available to the press for publication. (3) Group Eligibility. � . city currently has sore twenty -seven non - profit groups on the rotating fireworks list. All of the groups, with the possible exception of the "California Psycho Education System" are either general purpose service clubs or non - profit organizations within the City that are youth oriented. Criticism has been made regarding single purpose groups like a r❑t_out Troop or Pony Colt League operating a fireworks stand ..her than a general purpose group like Kiwanis or the Women's Cluts. Although this cri;1 2`_sm 4as beer. ;imitod, the primary concern is that sin;lle purces� - rn-�'ns !p cot. provide funds to a variety of interests and are parocnial in distributing their /'unds earned from fireworks sales. 1', is staff's opinion that any new restrictions would be met •.�: •,h :;cr.,:)g opposttlrel and Gnat groupn .;Coady on the list whi,,h runs through 1988 would likely remain until the present list to exhausted. It would be staff's recommendation that the cli,,ibility of groups be determined by the City's existing policy established March 21, 1979, and that requirements be created for substantiating the distribution and use of these funds. Evaluating the use of the funds and utilizing that as a factor in determining eligibility will have a greater impact to �, , Advisory Commission Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks Page 3 _..nure "proper" use of these funds rather than arbitrarily' ...._._sting groups that are permitted to have a fi.re>:orks stand. (4) Uj2 cf Funds from Fireworks Sales. S. ;bstantiating the use of revenues generated from the sale of safe and sane fireworks can be accomplished in several ways. a. Require each group to submit a list of projected projects to be accomplished with revenues generated from fireworks sales. b. Require each group to submit a list of complcted projects or donations /committments made by each organiza- tion /service club at the end of the calendar year in which they had a fireworks stand. C. Require each new organization and organizations current_y on the list to submit each year a copy of their non- profit tax report which would outline their expenditures for the year. d. Require that a portion of the proceeds from fireworks sales be contributed from each stand to the par" development /park rnintenance fund. This would inr.:r- that some of the revenues would be ded.cated tc park /youth programs that benefit the general public. e. Restrict total expenditures of fireworks sales to specific projects i.e., youth programs, service programs involving total community etc. (5) Enf- ;roc ^ent /Use of Ille¢al Fireworks. r�'eC F"cerstcin has . -u [gastad several enforcement methods to increase penalties 's.- ,. ,.,olvi ; safe and sane fireworks as well as illegal fireworks. Chief Feuerstcin will be in attendance to discuss these potential methods with the Advisory Commission. k�. Rancho Cucnnon„a Advisory Commission January 27, 1983 2 ' CPage Jo-, Whi.s mentioned that once a site is declared a M sts. ^_a. ;: naaark, funds can be more readily obtained for rennovation. Some time in the future the Advisory Commission would like to racer :e input, directly from Historic Preservation Commission members resard4r.3 their function. The Advisory Commission requested that staff prepare a letter of invitation to the members of the Historic Preservation Cc=isslon. Glen Rankin arrived at 7:35 p.m. and took his seat at the commission table. B. SdLE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREEWKS. Chief Feuerstein, Foothill Fire District, presented statistics cn fires resulting from the unsafe use of legal and illegal fireworks. Illegal fireworks and home manufactured type caused 83 °n of fires whIle 17 were caused by the use of safe and sane fireworks. Sparklers were responsible for 52eo of injuries. The majority of problems center on: (1) those who buy fireworks, (2i those who use fireworks, and (3) controlling illegal use. Possible solutions to curbing fireworks hazardsi 1. Restrict buying age through vendors. 2. Fu Dlia relations programs to be presented to educate children and more appropriate, a program to educate their parents. 3. Establish a stricter enforcement policy. Chief Feuerstein feels to be effective all three of the forego'_ng solutionp would have to be implemented at the same time. Sharon Rcmero stated flyers detailing laws and enforcement procedures s,ern sent to every home in the Pomona area and proved to be very c. ":ecti•e in curbin, the il:zgal use of f4reworls. A dizouzaion was held regarding fireworks shows presented by local service groups, but prohibitive factors included: finding suitable locations, pruparatim, of the location, expense ($100,000 - ;150,000), and in: :ur%uili.ty. Jc!.n Lyons, Foothill Fire District board member, added that possible deterrents 'Would he publicity showing dangers and results of illegal use of fireworks and adding more manpower. at 8:25 p,m. and the meeting reconvened at 8:40 p.:r, with i'am Henry. l ;i.:n C'Ry au+ :;tool t.:,) Su i;hborhond 14atch June meeting couil to .. saf-aty iw tren,!ss. Also, thn: 5ar.c... vtwan: Climb pot: i.;r :.a a 7ei6:,aornood 'Watch cowslettor tnat .wide fi.rewarks safety inforeation to residents. , �� 1 Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission January 27, 1993 •Pa--o 3 The Advisory Commission requested that PR material show, in lar,-,e pr4:it, hazard areas and that most injuries occur through unsafe use of irlQers. This could be posted in the newspaper, "Grapevine ", and at .works stands. Large signs showing high fire hazard areas snc,,__ be posted in conspicuous places on fireworks stands. Use of funds from fireworks: Substantiating the use of revenues generated from the sale of safe and sane fireworks could be accomplished in several ways. Ga1 Fequire each group to submit a list of projected projects to be ✓ accomplished with revenues generated from fireworks sales. oRequire each group to submit a list of completed projects or dcnations /committments made by each organization /service club at t end of the calendar year in which they had a fireworks stand. Require each new organization and organizations currently on the list to submit each a copy of their non - profit tax report which would outline their expenditures for the year. • d. Require that a portion of the proceeds from fireworks sales be co_crihuted from each stand to the park development /park na4n.tenar.ce fund_. This would insure that some of the revenue would be, dedicsted to Park/youth programs that benefit the general public. e. Restrict total expenditures of fireworks sales to specific projects i.e., youth programs, service programs involving total ecsmu^i ty, etc. The Advisory Commission unanimously supported a, b, and o as reccire: ;e.n.ts to t !mpcoed to _.......e the appropriate use of funds generated from firework_ sales. 'elizibi]ity Jim Frost expressed co nonrn as to venom ::,..._,. be the beneficiary of the fund., Under the exist!ng ordinance a number of organisations can q:a 1!ry. For example, every sports tear; would qualify as an organization With funds going to the team rather than the or�nninetion as a whole. Addi:.io::al Advisory Commission recommendations: 1. R•uarict buying age through vendors. Insure eduction and enforcement. 1.. PR program to be presented to oducato children and parents through the ef:'crts of the Fire District and service clubs /press r- r1•:nses/ "Grapev4ne ", etc. is tno!:2h a stricter enforcement policy with cooperation of Fire • Di:aric!. and sheriff's Dopartmant. C r�r CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM September 14, 1982 TO: City Council 1977 FROM: Jim Frost Councilman SUBJECT: Fireworks - Item 7A The purpose of again raising the fireworks sale issue is twofold: A. The existing ordinance has been on the books long enough that some limited review of its content may be of use. Given potential State mandate, the question of sale may be moot. Continued use of Fireworks is probably also un:lorthy of debate; many organizations and individuals benefit. At best, discussion would be a no -win situation and will probably be post- poned until after our first safe - and -sane related catastrophe, if any. As noted, the ordinance itself relates only to "use and sale." B. Who and why? Ambiguity of direction and the proliferation of "eligible" organizations suggest that extensive review begin immediately. This item has been delayed for the past several years, although specific discussion has bubbled to the surface occasionally. There are at least four areas in need of direction: 1. quantity of booths 2. Who is expected to be the final beneficiary of the sales 3. Who should be allowed to sell Within these categories, we also need to determine if existing practice is appropriate, or whether we should either tighten (restrict), or 1^esen our regulations. 4. How can we do more to increase the safety factor for the consumer through awareness or other programs. When the Citizens' Advisory Commission has heard the issue in the past, its direction was primarily to recommend a "yes" or "no" on the subject of sale and use. I would suggest as one of Council's options that the CAC be directed to hold public hearings again and make findings and recommendations in regard to the "who" and "why" aspect. Should Council again wish to delve into the fire- works issue, I would further suggest that any action be completed before the end of the calendar year. JF:ba m< C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONIGA I . _ Y f"-` v ,,y [ •.. '. tr, N•y..Jon D. Flikels ' _ ���_ •i Clurles l II Jamie C. Frost Richard NY. )1. D Dahl Phillip D. ScLlnsscr W. 7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREWORKS STANDS ROTATING ROSTER sTd;:DS - 1983 STANDS - 1987 1. El,:s Lod E;, :72576 21. Boy Scout Troop #644 2. Rancho Cu.ncoraa Women's Club 22. Cucamonga Men's Service Club 3. Pep Warner Junior Football 23• Kiwanis of Rancho Cucacong- 4. A.C.E. Youth Softball 24. Vineyard Little League 5. Rotary Club 25. Boy Scout Troop 0641 s Td::D3 - 1984 STANDS - 1988 • 6. 7, Sons of Italy Miss Softball America 26. 27. Rancho Grande Kiwanis California Psycho - Education 8. Rancho Cucaco ^ga Junior Systes Wocen.'s Club 28. Mobile Meals Inc. 9. Alta Lcr..n Little League 29, Etiwanda Historical Society 10. Boy SecuL Troop #643 30. CeL d N.5 %PctiC. 3oe.ls. (Jack Peterson) l'", ST;::DS - 19813 STANDS - 1985 31. 11. North Kira: Presbyterian 32. Church Youth Group 33, 12. ALHS "nand Booster Club 34. 13. Hoy Scout Troop 4625 35. 14. A�cr.ca.. Luh!an Post 835 15. Cucnr..onGa District Lions Club STLilDS - logo ° ^:! ^S - 1086 36. 37. tu. Boy ;•r'_ Trn,;p d7C 38. 17. 11n7 Cacu:. Troop x1646 39, 18. CEtru:; Little League 40. 19. ALiiS ;..,..tic Booster Club 20. %::y Col' League • O� _. 93:0RASILISK ROAD, OPPICK IIO110X FRANT110 CI'C'AMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 (711) 939.1$51 C CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA MEMORANDUM March 17, 1981 TO: City Manager City Council FRO14: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Managerct- SUBJECT: Chamber of Commerce Request for A FirVUeworks' Stand - 1981 As you are aware, the City has received a request from the Chamber of Commerce to consider modifying the City's eligibility requirements to obtain a permit to operate a Fireworks Stand. Current Council policy was adopted by minute action March 21, 1979 (see attached minutes) and established the following policy: 1. One fireworks stand per 10,000 population. 2. Accept staff's recommendation to establish a rotation system for issuance of permits with qualifying organization being added to the list each year. In addition, to establish a random drawing to determine the order of priority for the original list. 3. All monies be turned back into the community. 4. Fifty -one percent of an organization's membership to be residents of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. Be a non -profit organization with certificate on file with the State and to present this as proof of organization's status. 6. Li -it drawing of first applicants to the ones currently on file. The ones not drawn this year will be on the list first next year. All new applications be added to the bottom of list in order of receipt. Those having stands this year to be placed at the end of In addition, the City adopted Ordinance No. 78 in May of 1979 which established regulations affecting the Storage, Use and Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks. Should Council wish to consider expanding the eligibility requirements to include the Chamber of Commerce, there are several companion issues that the City Council may or may not wish to consider: Continued..... l� March 17, 1981 Page Two Chamber of Commerce Request for Fireworks Stand 1. First of all, it would not be necessary to adopt a new Ordinance. Nothing in Ordinance No. 178 limits the number of stands permitted or prescribes eligibility requirements for qualified groups. Council would merely revise its policy by minute action. 2. Expanding the eligibility requirements to include the Chamber of _ Commerce in 1981 would be counter to the existing policy where _ qualified groups rotate from bottom to top. Our current list of "eligible" groups extends into 1984. Although there is no formal commitment to any of these groups, it might raise thier ire if the Chamber is allowed to have a stand for 1981. 3. If Council commits to the Chamber, it might consider expanding the number of stands from five to six and consider the Chamber separately from the other service clubs and charitable groups. 4. Does the City Council wish to consider excluding single purpose groups, such as Boy Scouts, Sons of Italy, Women's Club, etc. and restrict stands to local service organizations.. If Council wishes . to honor the current group requests on file, a sunset clause could be established and begin with new eligibility requirements in 1985. 5. Consider the position that the Chamber of Commerce has other means of raising funds that are not available to charitable groups, service clubs, etc., and not expand the number of stands or eligibility . requirements at this time. 6. Allow those groups who have permits for 1981 to sell in July and re- evaluate the existing policy at a later date after the City Staff has received input, concerns, direction for review, etc. from the City Council. JR /vz • / T ...' FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD REGULATING TIIC STORASC, USE AND • SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Foothill Fire, Protection District does not approve. or the sale or use of safe and sane fireworks within th,i boun::.,ries of the fire protection district. The City of Rancho Cucan,,z;ya City Council has passed Ordinance #25 allowing the sale of safe and s3no fireworks within the city of Rancho Cucamonga; therefore, the fol:o•..- ing standards regulating the storage, use and sale of safe and sa:ie fireworks are hereby established and, further, tl:e foothill Fire Pro- tection District would recommend the standard be, establishe..7 as t!:.: official policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is limiting the number of st.in.is to one stand per 10,000 population and limiting the ISSeanea of license to civic and charitable groups with at least 51': o° their membership being comprised of residents of the city of Rancho Cuca- monga. SECTION 1. FIREWORKS DEFINED Dangerous Fireworks Dangerous fireworks are those as defined in Section 12505 of the Health and Safety Cod, of the State et California and may not be discharged in the city of Rancho Cucamonga at any time. Saf. and Sane Fireworks 1. Safe and sane fireworks shall include any fireworks not designated as dangerous fireworks. Safe and sane fireworks may be discharged within the city of Rancho Cucamonga during the period beginning at 12:00 noon on the 28th day of June and ending at 12:00 noon on the 6th day of July of the same calendar year. SECTION 2. .1.I: OF SAFE AND SANE' FIREWORKS The sale of safe and sane fireworks shall only be perr'.icta: in commercial districts of the city of Rancho Cucamonga a:•.' is subject to all applicable state laws an.l rccjulation.; an.i all conditions and standards of the Foothill Fire Protection. District. • -1- B. No person or permiLtee shall still suy s,tft! and -iar,v firv- 4oiks to a minor ullder the aqt- of sixteen (1(,) said minor is al:c0thisallic-d till parunt(sl Or C. Thu s.iLe of safe and sane sl;.ili k)f Beqill 12:w11 noon on the 28Lh day of .June ara shall 111,L after 12:01 a.m. on Lilt! Sth day of .July ,,- the year. !A:CTIOIJ 3. f.f(:1:14SES' ItEllMITS AND FE'E!; RE'QUYRi-'.n A. No person shall offer for sale or sell at retail all-.. sa. . e and sane fireworks in said city without first havin.-, applied for and secured a business license from said cit• and then applied for and secured a permit from the Footh1:1i Ilir,. protection District. B. Each application to the fire district shall be by two (2) sets of plot plans and shall Set forth the pro- posed location of said safe and sane fireworks stand. C. The fee for the.fire district permit shall be fifty ($50.00) for each stand and shall be paid at the tir.1, of application to cover the cost of special linspvcLions. Ie fee will be refunded if the application is denied. • D. All permits and licenses shall expire it 12:01 a.m. on the 5th day Of July. Any permit or license shall be subject to suspension by order of the Fire chief if he or his Iul. authorized representative has determined that any pernnitz, his failed to Comply With the terms and provisions Of Lhl� standard or any condition of the permit. SECTION 4. INSURANCE REQUIRED A. Applicant will attach the following to permit application: 1. Evidence of public liability insurance indicating: a. Name and address of applicant as insured or a holder of certificate of insurance issued in con- , nection with a policy carried by a supplier of safe and sane fireworks; b. That applicant, City of Rancho Cucamonga, and Foothill Fire Protection District are insurcds as respects liability arising out of operations an Icr activities conducted at the location described herein, or in conjunction with the named insures t� whom this policy is issued, and/or sale or use products purchased from said named insure.:; -2- I,! of co veraye Jv 1::01 n.:•1., to I!:II a.m., July 1'. ,u I er; ,1 • .nl,.l ad,4 e:::; o in.+uI •u:.:, , U . Limit.: of Iial,i l ily of n,I 1,.:::; tIt ul ,IJ1 1,••! $100, 000 -pub l i c I l i L•;' .u�d S'�h, UUn . L.. JJIIIJ I,: insurance; f. 'Types of insurance as (1) O._nara] liability inel i,li n..l 1, romi se`s 'a +L, r:lc ir..: I iahi I Ly. (L) C011tl'J1:t 111'.11 11 J1)I l il• ::peC11 I,',II IC r,•'o:. :L'::.. i ndomn i t ica t i oil a(; rucm,'nt s, i t h 111 iit" NanChU Cucan)(311lJ Jill P,+ut 11111 Ll iv' r,)t'i.,:. DistricL. (3) Products liabl Itty incIlll in,l a: Jfdrl Ola`.t UJvt:.l- tions liability. ' y. Location of operation as "safe anJ sane fl rr',:ol F:e stand located" (eSacL description of locJt.lon); h. That not less than Lhi rtv (30) d.r :; wri t LOn :,io: notice of cancellation or rnatrrial chanao ir. coverage be provided Lo the City of I2Jn.:ho 1u;.1- monga and thu Foothill Pin` pl- ,Loctio:l Dist tier • and /ur each addiLional insured in.li,!,rt,.•J in ch, certificate of insurance. �i1:T IfJ:I 5. OPF:IV,TION OF STAND A. Staffing 1. No person below the age of eigh Leen (113) years shall, at any time, be or be permitted inside said stand or to assist in the handling or sale of safe and sane fireworks. B. Location 1, All retail sales of safe and sand fireworks shall Lo III :witted only from within a tomporary safe :,n �.u;:• •I iroworks stand. Sales from any other buil.:in+ nr aLructure are hereby prohibited. -3- 0 2. do safe and sane fireworks stand shall he loc.,ted within twenty -five feet (25') of any other building, • nor within twenty -five feet (251) of any ignition source which could light or discharge safe and sano fireworks, nor within ono hundred feet (1001) of any _ promises where flammable liquids are dispensed. Mini- mum setback from street curbing or shoulder shall be ten feet (10').. 3. Said safe and sane fireworks stands shall be so loca- ted as to provide safe and reasonable ingress and egress thereto and to comply with the other provisions and terms of this standard. Said stands shall be located substantially at that place indicated on the approved permit for such safe and sane fireworks stand. d. Separate stands shall not be located closer than three hundred feet (300') apart. C. Construction 1. Safe and sane fireworks stands, as temporary structures, shall not be subject to the terms and provisions of the Building Code of said city, applicable to the construc- tion of permanent structures or buildings provided, however, that all such stands are erected under the supervision of the building and fire official, who • shall require such stands to be constructed in a manner which will reasonably insure the safety of attendants and patrons. • All utilities shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Building Code of said city, except that all electrical circuits entering such stands shall be connected through fuses or circuit breakers not to exceed fifteen (15) amperes. When the distance from the stand to the source of electrical power exceeds one hundred feet (1001), a temporary electrical power pole shall be set. ;!o stand shall have a floor area in excess of three hundred twanty (320) square feet. Each stand must have at least two (2) exits, thirty inches (30 ") in unobstructed width. All exit doors :;hall remain unlocked at all times When star..ls are occupied. Exit doors shall be openublo from Lh� in- std. without the use of a key or any special kr.os:led3a or effort. There shall be maintained a thirty inch (30 ") unobstructed aisleway from all parts of the st.uid to exit doors. Each stand in excess of fort, ' fact (40') in length must have at least three (3) _q_ Ii :l exits, spaced approximately equal distance apart provided, however, that in no case shall a person have to travel a distance exceeding twenty -four feet • (241) to reach an exit. D. Fire Protection Appliances 1. Each stand shall be provided with two (2) two and one -half (2s,) gallon water pressure type fire ex- tinguishers, in good working order and easily acces- sible for use in case of fire. E. Security 1. Metal fly screens shall be provided to cover all open areas on the inside of the booths where safe and sane fireworks are stored or offered for sale. The only exception to this requirement is the dis- pensing areas to which the public must have access. 2. Each stand must have an adult watchman or attendant in attendance and in charge thereof at all times while safe and sane fireworks are stored therein. No cooking, living or sleeping facilities shall be estab- lished or maintained within any stand. No watchman or guard shall sleep inside any such stand. F. Vehicles Parking on Premises • 1. There shall be no vehicle parking or parking of gaso- line generators or any type of flammable liquid con- tainers within twenty feet (20') of any such stand. Some form of physical barricade shall be provided to maintain this requirement. G. Removal of Combustibles 1. The fire district inspection may require all weeds and combustible material constituting a fire hazard, not including structures, to be cleared from the location of the stand and for a maximum distance of one hundred feet (100') surrounding the stand but, in no case, less than twenty feet (201). 2. All trash shall be removed from the premises and the safe and sane fireworks stand each evenim.l at the close of business. -5- • {'�) R, t•1 +:•t my of "NO !IDWKLNO" 5i qn:; "tin !It4OK 1N1:" signs, with let Lers lour 1,1•ih, shall b.• prominently disptay,d on .111 S10-'s Of Ua• S,Ifo and lime firewotks stand, both inr: i,!r a:N C,aLSt,1v. No person shall smoke or horn ..r. Ci.I,, I, Lty::, CL, IAIS, pipes_, IiglIt safe 'ind !:ane II I ow, 1 !: r., .:.at C: I. or "n., ether mat aria) wit It in ::u1-h St.u',d (.I wi t.!:i 1. i ,liSLaner of twenty -five feet (2'i') alit t: 113..1:,; su: !a and. 7. Alcoholic hoveragos 1. The co11sun1jrtion of :ury alcOhulic b. v1•r•t i,•S 3,!..11! prohibited in and around any safe and sauv itr, '.:,.•r+a stand. J. 5tora,le of Safe and Sane Fireworks 1. Safe and sane fireworks shall bo stored ol.lL' i:t t!:,• !life and Sane fireworks stand. It shall L,� uul.rai'al for any person to store safe and sane I i r,•wo,' %s in any buiidinq, residence, garule, how," auco:::n! 110, trailer, or any other vehicle within the ::it•• oc Rancho Cucamonga, except for Lonq • ,01-Ar Stora•L• of small quantities in a lesidence durill.j the !: rn.l.i of permitted sale, as defined in Section 2C. • K. RC16o Val of unsold Stock 1. AL1 unsold stock shall be removed from the leCJL1Un by 12 :00 noon on the 6th day of July. L. Erection /Removal of Safe and Sane Firewpt'ka SLand 1. No safe and sane fireworks stand shall be installeJ prior to 12:00 noon on the 20L11 clay of 311110 and 'Jell such stand shall be removed from the teml.orary loca- tion by 12:00 noon on the 7th day of July of the sa:a' calendar year. SLCTION 6. fRO!IIBITIONS ON DISCHAROE �. It zliall be unlawful for any person to ignite, explode, !)rnject, or otherwise fire or use any safe and sane firs w „li” or permit the ignition, explosion or pro7,.ctlon L!.,:rcef, upon, over, or onto the property of m.n%li.r wit-- out his consent, or to ignite, explode, project, or oi:Ktr- wisy fire or make use of any safe and sane firuworks wttc- in Lyn feet (101) of any residence, dwelling or other strecture used as a place of habitation by human beings. r,.; y. •1S ,. ..:'. •' : :.u,u'fii.•e,.rks :: h.,ll nnl l„ 0i'.. .,n,.• I !, fIIv h.i a.0 .1 :_n'=•_t nl' ::ai.! ri,,, ,:; b ;i ,o. :' • _ui•t ::h ..n oil the 7 Fire •Prov.•ut iuu t,'u rr,au r•.u, a r!,.. :'w,tti 11 Fire Protection Dislt in IL•d. l,pi. U'•.Y. ^•. ^f•' Am,!t ll :St Street, Itaucho lertdmUilgd, nor wouid result from such discha rqc. - C. ;w: :11tunr antler the age of sixt,•,•n 11G) ••o.lr:: u::i:..: a_ +t •. :,,ne fireworks shall h•. undo= thr :;w •utcir,inr. :'a' a . .. r,! : :),on:;ihle adult.. or,, t'irm or orgaoi�ation shall u,.uur a••!ui..•, : :•t•r•d`,. s011, offor for sale, posses:;, disehar•;o, :. lira, M. seP. off any llan,lereeg fireworks within the •'it•' of IOUtclio Cucamonga. Fire Chief or his duly Jut hori't" reDt'""t.n iv h:: t:: take, remove, or eanse to 1,.• rrmoved, M Of t.h,• owner, dll stocks of sal`0 an! ::.uta fit ri.••n'6o .. :'.. :, or - xi -osod Ior' SJ to or held i 1 vie I -it fan of :,t s:. "v lcs!! 7. CKIIRRAI. 7.. 'Pi,is standard, adopted by the Foothill. F'irr, Prot,•it!, :. Mi;t.rict, shall provide requlati0n�4 re,lardin,) �tor -t .•,. sales, use or discharge of safe and sane firvworki meet the intent of state and local codes and ordi n..r..•vs, e. 'file Foothill Fire Protection District will prot•idv, on issuance of a permit, a copy of these standards an:. requlations to permittee who shall, at his /their exper- , reproduce sufficient copies to provide a copy to each person working in said safe and sane fireworks stands, and a copy of these standards shall he posted in each safe and sane fireworks stand, _ _7- 11< r1 U s�. L u E ( I IFII REWORKS (rontinued) STnpg I1pAtA- SYsICI'+ rfY City Council Minutes March 21, 1919 Page 4 Those speaking on the issuevare Phil Tubillo, Sons of Italy, emphasized this was s n- profit or,anfzatfom and should have a part iv the Program, E.P. Guerra, Cucamonga Yen's service Club, .favored the rotation basis of selection. Bill Wieland - Vineyard Little League, favored the rotation basis of selection. bill Griffith, Rancho Cucamonga Kivants, in favor of the staff's recortmendations. Also suggested limiting irewarks booths to non- profit service arganimations that would turn monies generated in this fund raising effort back into the city for the becte rment of the city. Ron Reatur ight - Boy Scout Troop 641, favored the grand- father clause and felt more booths night be considered. Chuck Buquet, Miss softball America, expressed they would be able to use any money in developing fields stone there is a lack of fields in coup, John Rose, Citrus Little League, felt stands should be given on basis of needs. West expressed he would like to see sny money earned stay within the community. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by West and unani- moisly carried [hare should be as follows: 1. One fireo r'es stand per 10,000 pupula Cen. 2. Accept staff's recerxenL at ion to establish a to- tattoo system for issuance of permits wid, qualify ing organisations being added to the list each year. In addition, to establish a random drawing to determine the order of priority for the original list. J. All monies be turned back into the community. 4., fifty -one percent of an organisation's membership to Be residents of Rancho Cucamonga. 5, Pe a non-profit orgar.ication vith certificate on file with tbu State and to present th" as proof of organization's status. 6. Limit drawing of first applicants to the o [ currently on filo. Thu cuts not drawn th is year will be on the list fir,, mg., year All new apni l ca ti ups he id:ed to the bottom at list in order of r eeoi,c. Tiarse h,vtn; stagy! :; [Ids Scar to be placed at the end of list, Mr. b'a sseraan stated that since the last Council meeting, stiff Iled vet on ufo occasions with the representatf yes of [he industrlal community with the assistance of the Chamber of Commerce helptng to coordlnato the effort. A meeting, which u s held this afterooam, was for the par of indicating to the c memetty the extent of flood control problems in the etty and rationale fee staff anal Alvlsory Committee's recommen1uti m, to council for the Morn drain fee ordinance. Mr, II b!" Ciry l:ml i me er, ;.vc an were IPV of storm drain needs a the city nth somleapproai as t¢ teats. Fen Will". Building Association Industry, Indicated the aiA felt there cos mn inJ llanrc with the Syete-s Development fees. Me felt that If such a fee were I �,f imposed, Council should take Into cansfderulnn: r� City Council Minutes Marsh 21, 1919 • Page 0 HISTORICAL Dougherty pointed out chat the enabling section would apply ORDINANCE to all applications under the ordinance. In certain it- camstances Council might want to have a filing fee and that Ordinance Council would have the power to sec fees by A Resolution No. IO once the ordinance was established. (first reading) Motion: Moved by Mikecha seconded by Palumbo to approve (continued) sOrdinance April Ho. Io with changes in Section valy IR (b) and (ins set April 4 for locoed reading, and valve entire reading. I- mo[Son unanimously carried, i ORDINANCE NO. ID Council considered what the benefits weld be to the city AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF as opposed to doing this ourselves. Mr. Ruth pointed RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN HISTORIC out the city had no Housing Authority of its own and only PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO ACT IN ADVISORY CAPACITY an Housing Authority vas approved to apply for these TO CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESEEI'A- available funds. Mikels expressed that deal TION OF HISTORICAL OBIGCIS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES XiD A great of 1...e wen[ in,, establishing the three adopted elements of the Ceiera3 SITES AND TO IDENI'FY PERSONS OF HISIORICAL SIGNI- Plan and can foresee same type of effort going in tc t ^• FICANCE To THE CITY OF RANCHO GUGAMO:[CA. LOOPERATIOV A cooperation agreement with San BernardiV. County which AGREEMENT deals with publicly owned housing unit. within, the Ciry OF 00.t NiI of Rancho Cucamonga. Phil Rush from the Of:ice of Cc.unity DEVELOPMENT Development, San Bernardino County, addressed Council. Council considered what the benefits weld be to the city 1. Advisory Cammltree - Chuck Buquet, Chaireen, for the as opposed to doing this ourselves. Mr. Ruth pointed Cucamonga Subcommittee, said the Advisory Committees' main out the city had no Housing Authority of its own and only Concern was storm drains which would be reported an an Housing Authority vas approved to apply for these lacer. They had been working an the sign rdip.... and available funds. Mikels expressed that deal • A great of 1...e wen[ in,, establishing the three adopted elements of the Ceiera3 ! jI Plan and can foresee same type of effort going in tc t ^• 3. Historical Cemmlssion - Leonard Cotctyea, Acting Housing Element. He stated we should develop this Issue Chalrntn, stated that to .news, quesH ens which were before rushing into a decision with the County. being asked about sites which have been named of hf st.alcall Motion: Moved by Mikels, exceeded by Palombo to direct importance, the neat step will be to take these Bites and this to staff to explore the kinds of alternatives that estnbllsh an inventory in accord.lece with the prescribed are available to Rancho Cucamonga and how a consfderaticn form and outline by the State. Than the list will be subm ltepd Of this item could be integrated into conside rattan of the to the City Council who will be final authority on des IS- Housing Element for the General Plan. Motion unanlrausly carried. nations. COMMITTEE 1. Advisory Cammltree - Chuck Buquet, Chaireen, for the REPORTS Cucamonga Subcommittee, said the Advisory Committees' main Concern was storm drains which would be reported an lacer. They had been working an the sign rdip.... and were now working on Anne other Stems with staff. Meetings .re on third Thursdays each Conch in the Library, 3. Historical Cemmlssion - Leonard Cotctyea, Acting Chalrntn, stated that to .news, quesH ens which were being asked about sites which have been named of hf st.alcall importance, the neat step will be to take these Bites and estnbllsh an inventory in accord.lece with the prescribed form and outline by the State. Than the list will be subm ltepd to the City Council who will be final authority on des IS- nations. CFiP R.:_nggg_ L 11m Robinson, Assistant to the City Manger. presented the .toff report, staff recommends Hon to CouecLL wax. "Establish a In, "inn system (or issuance of permits, U::alkfild araaniz at tons would be nddud to the list each year. In addition, the City Council could consider A ran - dun Jrawirl ar /.[May to determine the order of priority fur this erI,innl list. TToxe quAlified aIg.n Uz.tlons that receive licenses each year would ro"re to the bottnn of the list and move up the list a license. are issued each year. Upon written requeat,qual i tied organ /rations Wald be added to the list each year." 17 0 ORDINANCE YO. Ttl AN IIDDINAIC.E OF TIC CITY COE::CIL 1,F TIIF CI CY r• RINCHI Ct'C:JViNCT, 111I,IFORNIA, RI,!':, \TI::C TIE 1- 1RA1F, SID.!'. OF SAFE StU SANK. FTREPnDKD WITHIN T!fE CC': V ad:Y;', CI'C."MN11. 0 Vic C1[v Cnnneil of [he Cie: of Rancho Cuca-.onca, G:i.. nn, n,•es "Idnin as fn lloac: SECTION' 1: Ordinance 25, approved and adopted thu 12t'n da': of Yav, 1910, is hereby r ,eale d. SECT TON 2: INTENT ADD PURPOSE I[ is the inum[ of this urd lnance to safeguard life n r 1 - health, Property and nuhlic velfa« by ragulu[ing and centiol::e starnee, sale, u oi dis rg chae of safe and cane lite•.oiks a1- City of Ranrho Curaiona. SECTION 0: FIRE.ORKS DEFINED A. Danecrous Fireworks are ehose defined in Svc[inn i of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Callfcima, and may no[ be discharged in the City of Rancho Ccc;-a,a at anY tine. B. Safe end s e fireworks a e those defined in Section Stat"of 12504 of the Health and da0afety Cede of,. California. Sail .pa a 9 fireaorke e, `n l cha:gcd vlrhin the Cl o: of Nancho Cohn -.anew duri1 tur . , I beeinn iIT e[ 1::90 n nn the 2J In day of ., nod;a dLd IT li:n1 �..., n too fish Jav . _. ,, of the -., . mL'iW n[ v [. SFCTTM 4 SALE OF SAFE AND SA:'F. Fl RFt I1'FS A. The sale of We and s. a fireworks aF.na Only be Per-itt 1-C in r rcial dlatifc[ano [he City of 9a nc ho Gat ar: nia and i�mn,.••t t nil .ipPli: able stun In'as end re , ,!a,rn - ns and all 1-1111,1 it innc of eh i, ordinance. o Pnrcnn n 9. 1!(1-1,1 shall hell n .afo and c ltrevn rks to .I �, ;Oder [M1c 1", ^t sip -ta en (141c J' ht v'r.1-r pa rent R.) C. '1'bc vale o ..Ile and a iinnnrk.e ah,11 n r nrN In X280 ,1-11-11, 1' •,f .hn and shall all .o¢Inu. �Ifwr 1'IOl a.n. anv[In: Slh My of ,filly [he san:t vv radar L A. a 11-1.1,,11 +uall ,ff,l for ale cr sell a rolall all, +d lr ;end :am t lr•vuri : In .;aid ct" vi"' ... I fill[ fIA1 :11 aPPIL!J I.m ad oumd A buninoll Ilrona' r .a id it' 11J IW,n mrh,d In ad .. cnrrI a n. ,it _. i nand the Fu..tim) Flro U"Ilicr a liV01iral P"r,t far .an I'll 1.'.I cl o, trig d ;man fn,m rhr :t dl.11m: mf Irlal. 0 r Ordln.tnca `:o. )S on ge : • (B. Each application for the sale of cafe o firework% .b. 1L he a omPanied by there U) s of pkt Plans and shall set forth the proposed location If said sofa and sane fireworks stands. C. All Fell's and I.conses shall exvirw at 12:0: a.m. on " the ith day of duly. Any petmi[ 1e license shun he subtext to uapensian by order ne me Fire Chief or Building Official if he or his duly authortzed representative has determined that are pemittle has .`ailed to comply with the terms and provisions of this ordinance or any conditions of the permit, D. Temporary Sales Tax Pc role Required. (1) OrRanimefons licensed for the selling of safe and sane fireworks are e required to obtain a [enporary sales [ax perm it from the regional office of the State Board of Equalisation. E. Display of Business License, Sales Tax Pernit, Fire District Permit and California State Fire Mtr s�Ial Retail Fireworks License. (1) The License to all fireworks, the temporary sales tax pemlq he Foothill Fire District pert[ a the California State Fire Marshal's Retail Fireworks License shall be displayed in a prominent place in the fireworks stand. F. Britten pmroissi.. of the sonar of recoca or lessee of the property of which the safe and sane fireworks stand is to be located shall aFF.P.Fy the aPplica[(oa, SECTION h: INSURANCE REQUIRED . ( A. Appllrnnt shall also provide [he fellnwing at the tine I, of p.^ntO app; lc acinn: (1) Evidence of public liability insnranee tr.d :c at5ng: (a) Name and address of applicant as insured o held,,: of certiftcate of insurauce issued tv connection with a policy carried be a supplier , of safe and sane fireworks; (b) That applicant. City of Rancho Curamnngn, and Foothill Fire PF.LeCHan District .Ire invmeds as r..... liability arints, out of operation, and Js ar ac[fvit iev conducted at the location l :i.mct:nn with the der rein. ' o red to..'I'm this policy is issued, and /or sale or so, of products purchased from said named insured; (ej Peried �( a race le 12:01 a , ,lum• 28, or earlir:, to 12:01 oom., duly 15m or lat,.r; (I) Name and address of rose.. :, a (o) LHitx of liahill" of a, lss than 5100,01101 510n,000 puhl,c liability and 5511,0111 prvq„a n' dar.ue in•otanea; _. fil Type'% ot taxman', as: I) Corn ril liability Inrlud u: •. Pr..i a a/ t, r Ord:n.mre De. )S P."„ I 3) font r.,r tu:at liabllir: PlcifiF,111 refer urine ". - vith 111. Cl tv u[ R.I. n fuc .,,:a ..a ronrhill Fir, Pr"oto"n Di ctr fct. J) Prnduau, liabiaor '! ;1i.., PI . oper.,tiens liahlli,,. r (F) L, Wn of np_rn".., ." ".of• • i sane tireworks stand" (exact descr iptiono location); (h) That not less than [hill; (30) dale written naterial prior notice of cancellation c r e ae In coverage be provided [o the City of P.nnchn Oucanonno and the Foothill Fire District ar. eaz h additional insured indi ra trd in the e+r.l (i c.C. Of insurance. SSCTION l• OPCPATION' OF STAND A. 5taffing (I) No person below the age of eIgl,llcD (18) )wars shall, or any time, be nr be permivtrd inside s stand or to assist Sr. the handling or :;ale of se.. and are fireworks. P. Locatlon (I) All retail sales of safe and sane fireworks s all be pe ante only fn.n Sale, a te1-. atler —r Sales a -�r pu....d . send fireworks n,en,e I a hc,, !,ite nmr me M1ereb;: prN,i hied. e firorks. s (]) No safe a•d s s ewfivo wi til In [vent. - feet (25') of a nI1w, n , .it'n in twenty -i r+e feet (2") I'll source i,h aoold light or dl,c'n;rse —f. ard ranL fireworks, nor within one hundred foot (100') of any premises where flaamible lion;-,, are disronsed. Minim, .erhark from street cn root e r shoulder % 0.,11 he ten feet tin'). (1) Said safe ands a fireworks stand, shall be so Ioe,ued n, rn r led: =nfe ., n rent m,hle intro,,, and aO:;tt th",," and t �a Rr '• , rile other n o,rn, n tllio.�r.li nnnp o. Said `.., anal. .,. • It trial place Indicated sn 1. uqq �.� na r,lr .,r ..�,. ., and sane fireworks stand. (4) Sepal ate lowl. ,Fall nna he 1 rt;1 ,Cool Il.ln thn•c eon !n,d feel (IDe') a,It. (U Nab n,.:. 6 +t ; rvrr vv I I rv:., , bI. IL, F111 net ibl, f en 111, ter -, an . L prnvl,i „n, of Ill' iloyhlr ng code ,al.l Ill, I a,Pli, Flu lhr +tr rtia III p• anrnt i, to ns r , pr iJeil, Ins .per. tp¢ • rclrn ni, .1i,,+ ,orndn a ee u r tlu• ,npr rvn,inn m Uo• I... r'P �Fl hn il.11u 11 re I'h la1. .�n ..d l cyn rL (lolal ad I urb am... 11 le. -011111... o- '� Ih ill !,Iv Ilia .nl oty I rtrona,nt. m nm „ua nr urn Ordinantn ::o. 29 Page = • (2) All utilities shall be installed and m icd-.ia acoo dance with the d,dldin. rude .f said cite, .elpt that all uhcdaieai c 411.ils a er[nS melt swnd.. shall be c acted [hrooub fusua or truit - breakers kers nor [o exceed fifteen (13) a h'licn the distance flux sand t, he cuuev of electrical pm exceeds one hund,ed fee, (100'), a temporary electrical power polae or generator set shall be provided. (3) No stand shall have a floor area in excels, of three hundred twenty (320) square feet. (4) Each stand must have at least we (2) exit,, thirty inches (30 ") in unobstructed width. All exit doors shall cluselin unlocked at all times when stands are occupied. Exit doors shall be aprrabl. fron the inside without the I s r n e of a key o ecfal knovludee or effort There shall becl in[ninec a thirty inch (30 ") ...hs[eucted aisleway from all parts of the stand to exit doors. Each stand in s of force feet (40') in long[!, lust h at are least re three (3) exits, spaced appxinately distance apnr[, provided, fioveve r, [hat la n a shall a pars.. have to [ravel a distance exca ediae twenty -four feet (24') it each on exit. D. Fire Protection Appliances (1) Each stand shall be provided with ts:o (2) two and o n e -half (24) gallon water pressure type file in good worlds; order and easily neeessible for use in case of fi re. CL- • Secn rlty (I) Metal fly scre.v, with not less [Iron Ie a 15 u, openings, shell be provided to ovez p„r. all o areas on [he inside of the bou[hswhere safe and land fireworks are stared o offered for sale. The only exception to this requirement is he dispen.xing areas [o which he public all Iraee (2) Each stand must have an adult wntchnmt or • attendant In attendance and in rhar,e thereof at all tft— while safe and sane firewnrke .to st.rod therein. No cookin g, living or ill`, ule r ciltti ":: a1111 h c I.,bli,h,d a - wi[I:la any stand` No v tchmnn or guajl shell aloe, inside any swell sta,nl. F. Vande.lea Parking nu Prenl zes (1) Thvr.. .hell 1, Mull le I`d rlic,; nr parkin, of gdsolinv n ,arur, o any ty of (Lassa Lle pe ligmd ,a!n. r. vl[L [u twenty -I I,, feet (23') of d veil ,rand. Sdmv f ut ph' 't'll oa sh rrirade all be provided to malulaiu till: flu nmL I- 11. R'nulal of f,mL :r :[t41v. vnl (I) At .1:1 :.11111 mo: alhla n,nvridl, out Inc ludine atwt n .1 —, 1I :.ill Ll . n•mnvnI from ill, IeentI of tlr .t .:al l ntri,um d1:3 ,n tm•n[y -flea feet ,l,',err :,,nd is .. the •a and,o, : • r 1p nrd.i:,.aare No. 71 Pa g. i M %It l'-1, s1.,Il be removed f the a w .nl . � flrrvmrks atand -nt Pfomiws ..,�h --rini or Ibe chat ut hnsiacrv. it. .us[L,g of "F1 Sx0kl110" Signs (1) "No SWUNG" with letters :. .:d,vs (0 ") high. Whale her prom -etly displayed u all slda, of the s r I i sm,e fireworks stood, both le—, and outs iJ e. No parson shall %make or burn a "Sureties. cigar, pipes, light !;aft and x ftrmrks, aatcbex or any other :.[trial w -five ueh stand or within a distance of I enoy feet (25') s.,roo.d1.q such stand. I. Alcoholic Beer ragas (1) Th. emotion of on,, alcoholic btvr:ages shat! be prohibired in and around any safe and Sane fireworks stand. J. Stnr.age of Safe and Same Fireworks (1) Safe and s are fireworks shall be stared Date In tht safe aryl x e fireworks aland. It shall be unlawful for any person to store cafe and same fireworks In any Wilding, residence, garage, hnvt automobile, trailer, or any other vehicle within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a cep[ f ampn car: storage of small gnantitics in a e during the ocrlod of PIr,Itind sale, as deft. d in Sea ina 4C. A. RelOVal of Unsold Snick (1) All , sold .duck shall be r wed from ere In, :Hen by 12:00 nrou :,, the 1,11, .icy ,: Jnlp. L. Erection /Rertoval of Safe and Sane Fireworks Send (1) No sat[ and < r fireworks stand shall be installed - prlor to 12:01) : no Line 20th day n and ueh ueh stand shall be r wed from the romper location by 12:00 noun oa the 7th day of July of the came ral••un.ar v r. FRii, .:.T!nNS nA p15CdARrr, A. ,,, , .. , exptude, rand pro tecq or W erurse it" a, use any xa(e sane fireworks nr p:•rmit the ignition, explosion or pro Joctton th. —It urv,n, , m „nro env rn: p,•rly If . .,the, wWl. ,t !. .. 'n-nn'. or Ignite, r. oluct, •II, : ... „ ... i0', 01 „ Jvell,Ia;, or other strlv.; . used as Pldu e. h, d 1, , hn :a ,,.I ,,.I . R. L 5..1, .u:,l s ne fi,o.,k..h.lil not hr Ill .rharn•.1 within ants 411 fire l....r.I nl ikl, its, .. Jeemtn¢ei 'l I:d l.: , the fI .: I'f rvrntl:n +an at th.' I'.•n hll l��Plre Ulsrrl.I Station, .. , nbl' y. Intro.. a' r I( a tll'r ha[at l`vuhlJ IA..Idi N.r— n.1 n ul, .nn n.. 1, .l .":r 1.�ale. 1p Old inane. 9o. 78 Pm;e 6 C r F C. Al,, n nor undo, 1h,, age of sixteen (16) ;.ears using -. ,,I(, nd • (i[ work, shnli h. under tLC au Von t�tm, of � rra ry,ns ih tc auvlt. -D. No p.r a,n, firm o nrpnnizarion tali n. ,, .� ' "ol" display, .sell, n n for erne. Vo, <.,acuJ ESC'u.argr, asplodr, fire, or see off n r dan-. rr one fir ..ern within cho City of Rancho Cucamonga. E. The Fire Chiuf, or his duly nnthariacd representdEive, i ^a shall seize, take, r c to bo r at the expense of the counIer, all stacks of safe , sane fireworks offered o exposed for sale, or held in violation of this ordinance. SECTION 9: PENALTIES A. Pe,sons vio IDt ing this ord Ira nee shall be domed 1nilg1 of a misdemeanor and, upon c .vi.1ian In ... of, shall he punished by a fine nut to e • god $500.90, or by inprtsonmenE in the C. jailfor a per f od not to exceed thirty (30) days, or bath such fine and Further violation of the lice-.c provisions shall be cau,. for the license to be revoked. SECTION le: The Mayne shall sign chls Otdlnnnco and the City Clerk shall at Eeze t. the a mc, and Ne City Clerk shill cause ,he same two be published within fifteen (15) days after its pazsa ae, at Ienst once in The Daily Report, a new.ipaper of general circulation published in the Clty of Ontario, California, and circulate) in the City of Ranch. Cucaneng•b Calffarnia. l PAS.t F.D, APFRO:ED, AND ADOPTED ehis 16th doy of Noy, 1979. •� CAl'E5 i Schlosser, Palumbo, L k,ls, Bridge, Fro<t. NOES: None ASSENT: rune AT— IT: C,�� �r � 0 0 • 0 710ard of ? tip eruisors i! `onnhl of :!�an #,ieruardinu C ..0 31 , .,C 1 .,3 Eubert 0.1. Townsend SUPERVISOR FOURTH DISTRICT f9lartin A. (Eeruantrs ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT February 28, 1983 The Honorable Jon Mikels Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 i7 Dear Mayor hlikels: i Members of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors received copies of the Las Vegas Super -Speed Rail feasibility study summary. The Chairman of our Board has asked that I prepare a response on behalf of the County Board of Supervisors. I have attached a copy of the draft joint response from San Bernardino County and SANBAG for your information. Should you have any additional comments or concerns which should be included in the response, please forward them to my office by March 8, 1983. ROT:DRB:c Attachment Sincerely, Robert 0. Townsend Supervisor, Fourth District MAYOR BILL LRNRE TI 4 -' coaaNNOURIE ail RON `URI` PAUL 1. CHRIST(NSEN M LEVY CITY of LAS VEGAS WILLIAM U. PAL N ARSON arr moR.n GF ORGf i. OGIO'IE RL'SS[ll February 4, 1983 Mr. Robert Townsend San Bernardino Board of Supervisors County Civic Building - West 175 West Fifth Street San Bernardino, California 92415 ;ear Bob: The feasibility study to determine the viability of constructing a high- speed /super -speed transportation system linking Los Angeles with Las Vegas is completed. The report states that a 250 MPH ;'aglev system can be built by 1991 and will operate profitably. Enclosed for your review is a copy of the Executive Summary prepared by the Budd Company and Bechtel Engineering. It's a well -done report and contains excellent information that will prove very useful. I am asking for your active support in this project as it will take our combined efforts to ensure its success. For the moment, a letter of strong endorsement from you would mean a lot as we enter Phase III -- Design /Development. Sincerely, William H. Briare Mayor of Las Vegas WHB:Iah Y OF LAS V • M • s D R A F T D R A F T The Honorable William H. Briare Mayor, City of Las Vegas 400 E. Stewart Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Dear Mayor Briare: on behalf of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), we are responding to the completed feasbility study on the Las Vegas Super Speed Pail Proposal. In preparing this answer, we have analyzed your full consultant's report as well as the Executive Summary. We have also drawn upon information presented at the January 27 briefing in Ias Vegas and subsequent conversation with Mike Daly. • Two meetings have been held with local officials, including representatives from the cities of the West End -of San Bernardino County and cities of our high desert region. This letter represents a consensus oc by the Board of Supervisors and the SA,NS4G Board. We are pleased with the Cajon Pass routing and the other technical parameters of the planning. obviously, we are not able to assess the readiness of magnetic levitation technology; we accept your consultant's findings. The right -of -way concepts seen workable, and we suspect that environmental considerations may be modest. Given your assumptions on ridership and costing, we are pleased that the financial viability of the train itself is recorted as favorable. However, the very optimistic "induced" patronage projections are critical. We note the concern expressed regarding risk capital, even at the earnings rate presented. our chief concern is the absence of any detailed economic impact analysis, beyond that related to the cost effectiveness of the train itself. In the absence of such information, we find ourselves unable to determine the economic impact within our County and, consequeitly, unable to reach an unqualified support position. �C William H. Briare Page 2 We strongly urge that, as your next action in pursuing the project development phase, you crnmission a thorough envirc rental impact study by a qualified, responsible consulting firm. In addition to the need for economic impact projections, our desert communities request renewed consideration of potential stations in the high desert for at least some trips. From our standpoint, the environrtental impact study should address at least the following questions: 1. What are the financial import -export implications for Southern California generally (induced expenditures in Nevada vs. California)? 2. What would be the projected economic impact in the Ontario terminal area, in terms of a refined, quantitative projection of hotels, restaurants, tourist attractions, and peripheral growth? C, J 3. What are the potential economic implications of • locating new industries associated with the developrnpt Of magmatic levitation technology in San Bernardino County, in light of the fact that we are the have of steel and aluminum fabrication industries? 4. What would be the financial requirements for improving surface streets and highways impacted by the location of a terminal in the Ontario area? 5. What would be the impact on highway - related economics in our desert communities, i.e., the loss of business from diverted traffic? 6. What is the capacity of the system as designed to accammdate a possible conmuter demand between Victorville and Ontario, recognizing a potential future terminal in the high desert area? A coo of this letter is being directed to the Southern California Association of Governments, and I am asking that they provide to you directly any additional comments relating to regional concerns. I would appreciate your attention to any coments that they may provide. • 0 F I� a .i William H. Briare Page 3 In closing, I would like to express our appreciation for your solicitation of input from our County. It is our desire to continue working closely with you as your development process continues. This response from San Bernardino County represents a consensus of individuals representing the populations which will be greatly affected by your project. Inasmuch as you have asked for our continued cooperation and support, I too hope that the City of Las Vegas can provide assurances to us that our concerns will be addressed in a manner which will peke this project a benefit to San Bernardino County, as well as Las Vegas. Sincerely, Robert 0. Townsend Super visor, Fourth District IPQdVa7tL•RN cc: S..kN- G Board of Directors Southern California Association Sohn Longville, President San Bernardino Associated Governments 0 7 vaa a vr aaa-uavuv vvvnnavaavn �O GUVaMgtc' MEMORANDUM f r of March 16, 1983 Fig U' 1977 TO: City Council FROM: Richard M. Dahl, Councilman RE: Landscaped Medians -- Arrow, Archibald, and Base Line Road REQUEST: I have had numerous requests that we study the need and impact of land- scaped medians designated for Arrow, Archibald, and Base Line Road. FOLLOW UP: In discussions with City Engineer Lloyd Hubbs, it was pointed out to me that the cost of just maintaining these medians would be in excess of one million dollars per year. In light of our city's financial crisis and the need to increase our park systems and the maintenance costs for parks and existing parkways, it would appear that we will need to reorganize our priorities (I have problems with landscape maintenance districts that cost the homeowner or landowner for unnecessary require- ments such as medians). CONCLUSION: I would respectfully request that this matter be referred to the Planning Commission. I do feel., however, that a median is necessary in front of the high school to discourage "jay walking" once our traffic signal at Vineyard is installed. 1A9 F_ L_ • c MEMORANDUM F D March 16, 1983 19ii ( TO: City Council FROM: Richard M. Dahl, Councilman RE: Road Designation -- Industrial Specific Plan REQUEST: I have keen requested to look into the road designation in the Industrial Specific Plan, east side of Haven Avenue, between 4th and 6th Streets (designated as "Street A" on the attached map). FOLLOW OP In looking at the sites, I found the site at the northern portion was a "brickyard" and was told that the owner was not in favor of the rear street designation. Other property owners along this strip feel that they would like to fully develop their parcelsto gain the highest and best use. I asked if they would have any problems with a "shared" driveway access to licit the nu:=b.r of accesses on Haven, and there was a general feeling that shared access would be more desirable instead of the "forced middle access." CONCLOSION: I would like tn request that the Council refer the matter to the Planning Commission fur recommendations at their next meeting. RMP: nk Attachment J J1 �y 39 Par Cucamonga Fruit Lands M. B. 419 Par Tract Na 2244. MB.35/5MO If-O)" 27 Rancho Cuc)mongo Cily Tax Code Aw ._._ 15015 O° V mirvio na xu lvKN AffalwA May 0 19 • Q IN zla P.00 Son Berrardirr Cn ly • ', wvnr 1 ! Q ; Lll K11M1 i � 0.l IG 4K - 1.YKY /C r.lf K.YM1 lAIKYA !lO IIM1 1 •YKN 0 e.,rM r/L Gl1/e. Yrl !ff K Aa I2 fv KI Q 0 Oi rGNK !T K t!1 a r/I !a K q 01 !.0 K rn � Q yr Al I I 1)tllrKl RN K ©� yr O L& r Y9i I Ia.w ANC IVG NO � ntc�rn I V I J V L STREET GiL'a:�a l r•jm c 9 �S O r ` o a 2 al C c o � o W' 0 � mirvio na xu AffalwA May • • N(/I'AIMIb /� BI*,() jy1 NurnMn Srwn in Prcka zla P.00 Son Berrardirr Cn ly • ', wvnr C!L.rAmOt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA g I b1V Az Jr,7 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: . - nn4.: c.w: .4 NAME ADDRESS 7 PHONE OCCUPATION EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) u4l ac D. U." ton -.a .�j� -t;.77 -.e 377 POSTOFFICE ROX Be? • RAN(:11()('UCA.%IO.NGA,CAI.IP()R.NIA91730 • (714)989-1951 Are there any workday evenings you could not Meet? If so, please list. .0 • Why are you interested in this position? 7eslr^ what do you consider to be your major qualifications? _L or u Y4- .-, -,ti r., 4 n - _nn an zirc:-' S -.I:,.o 't C".n lixon-": .r -.n :.2 ilcU3t. norec-:n3r _t.j no REFERENCES: 2 or 7. Pic ase attach a written statement contai n ing any add tiona 1, in f p r- mation you feel would be useful to the City Cou I I ' (Ify OF CUCAMONGA AOMINISTR, TION AM PH 718191WA12111213AA6 A POSTOFFICE ROX Be? • RAN(:11()('UCA.%IO.NGA,CAI.IP()R.NIA91730 • (714)989-1951 an's on z3ne on -�- ncno we .,.oi •7- -1 nnin- arn:,� to r"n a , . Ii . fro,-. teachin., -Lna oil' be -:::le to , and d-.'! of no Y g "INciaz wmad be pars inal, on- -ato insj.ecti= of a locatdon 'Tr-uFht mf w, h! 10-mission. 3,1"oCh 7 h—a xcell7nm ed-ic-tion and ::,c•jround in ..u'.Iic af.'a=-s, I realize I do no- h %n Be -ts:rars, by fl:.r—u-. I calieVe, 1 --n le of asking in- to ,en-, uas 1,ns in order to cake dccision-. nv=in, high or r. opposed to -- CO=iosion .lot; is poi:riza.i bet�..,een taoua f ors do!�aity, i -.arasts or Be �;enoral u:lic, contractors and raal nd .:neo n=, r,!,h incone or lv,c incona citiz3ns, rd so forth. hope -ui or Cie 10 ,n7t folio 1-.4 zrincig!�,❑ ":D-ald rovide 1, delines f cis- n-: to done to destroy the cro.party valuss on w hich amars erd. :._r,'-c-n citize-.3 h"s a r1lot to live wher,,-vir thoy went 'a -nd 'in - the r1or.,: the c,'---y -.u,t n ^_ :.re for ou ', , ,- ' ci'izans,�!Iho p- - ver their ecunozic status. sarM.-c-, in ou�, -,hops rnd Industry, w?A • a t �n- f:n=ons pl:cds in 7"hich to live. -hey n----r a ��orsV-r-H rply th? r�o,tdent4RI adjunct, to businese, corrlrce or %no !ovw. life" rewires Mone OT.Ploymen, and racra9tion -:rd r3c=.-..end--Aons y - n,, "I�t tn-.n 1,nnir7 �omniot<!-on L-In +-ve (a) opod A,t A, is "right" am, An 00 LWIC L-nta Mo u� .:�v-n r,- :n :,-.- U•IiC :ail'_ nU:t "71in to. �r z xnt` A so tn_t at in •y: do not -n-%3 -tty • CV CA %ao -�, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r lip -- 19` CIT17EW S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: PLANNING COMMISSION ADDRESS 9280 Hillside Road, Rancho PHONE 987 -3510 OCCUPATION U.S. Postal Employee EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) 15 + years - A.A. and Business Management Degree Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. none • why arr_ you interested in this position? I'm truly concerned about the future of our city and ill its citizens. What do } u consider to be your major qualifications? My 19 years of active cor. muni ty service including 6 years on the A.L. Chamber of Commerce Planning and Zoning Committee. Plus studies in Urban Planing and Zoning. REFERENCES: 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council members 2. Jeff King 1. Mary Nfmureut Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City council. POST OFFICE. BOX 807 • RANCIIOCCCAMOT iGA,CALIFORN1A91780 0 (714)989.1851 i ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Wanda Dixon My 19 years of concerned involvement in our community include; o Chamber of Commerce Board • o Chambers Planning and Zoning Committee (6 years) o Parade Chairman o Tree Farm Chairman o Toastmistress o Home Improvement Association o United Way Fund o P.T.A. Board 0 13 years of U.S. Postal Service in Rancho Cucamonga o Expzrience in formulating a City Budget My relevant education includes: o Pasadena College Graduate_ • o Studies in Urban Planning and Zoning o Recent Business Management Degree ,J l�P- 'Y'4CiW�: I.AJ-- Ci�rv- v,- Cr�.t•_ - �/'�C -C.� �i-r-i'KQ��..f� � ^L�. 4Lv- �i- Q�',n�vs- i.�v�y i✓- hM- s- r- r'1'kC�i -. �(�L.�- f�7i.. ���'Y.c -cu a / l L1".7_ 1 il,- :- l "�.wi �f...l.'}'- .� GG•'-L� .f 1il- C- G`-< -��-C. C .CC.wCi� i>a�.� ,iJ- c�- -c•i,_ �,.c�� i`�- �.�.i.�:,- uoVrc�.� ��E. .�i"�.,.,- cam..,-- e¢..le�yJ W1,NDA DIXON May 10, 1962 ROLE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN RELATION • TO STAFF, CONMOITY AND CITY - COUNCIL AS PERCEIVED BY WANDA DIXON The role of the Planning Commission as I perceive it is to understand and utlize the goals ,:nd objectives ..s adopted by the city - council. Accepting the best planning technology and knowledge available, to assist in decision - making, from the City -Staff and all areas. Basically following the General Plan, Growth Managament Plan, Industrial Specific Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan and any other planning documents available. CITY - STAFF: City -Staff should provide the technical research and fact- finding expertise to the Planning Commission to study, review and revise. Commissioner should work closely with Staff exchanging ideas. • CITY - COUNCIL: The Planning Commission should work to implement the policy of the city - council and ,pass their knowledge and findings onto the council members. In addition, providing major and minor planning policy recommendations should be an intregal part of this position. COP:UNITY: Good public relations .,nd rapport with the citi>ens is a basic nec- essity for all city positions. The Commissioners role should be to improve relations by improving public information and understanding on upcoming issues. Getting more people initially involved, aware of the facts, sounding out their feelings. The Planning Commission is a triangular - middleman between the staff, community and city - council. Their opportunity is to assist the council by weeding out problems, consolidating issues, making recommendations, and providing an initial community sounding- board. Thus allowing for a more complete underst,mding picture when issues 19 reach council level. WANDA DIXON May 10, 1982 MAJOR PLANNING ISSUES: 1 - 5 - 10 years • Every issue that comes before the planning commission is significant; particularly density growth, mobile -home problems, parks - open space, flood- conttol, balanced affordable housing, industrial development, protecting rural areas, and the planned communities. Each and every area must be looked at closely and eval- uated carefully. During the tine span of one to five and ten years, some basic issues rem.,in the same, but as time changes, so do goals. ONE YEAR: Growth - Density - As evidenced in the recent campaign and many times before this, is a key issue because of the rippling effect on different areas. Proper management and control must be maintained to prevent adverse impacts such as school overcrowding, inadequate fire and police protection and to protect existing single - family homes from high density encroachment. Mobile -Home Ordinance - Mobile -Home residents are a unique group • with unique problems. We must asist in finding a real solution to their problems. They need protection. Parks - Actually will cover whole span of time. We must continue part and facility acquisition and development. Banking land for the future. FIVE YEARS: Terra- Vista, Victoria and others - As building gets underway, new problems will arise. It will give us in opportunity to provide a V' -st range ul: typos of houses and create a ptaco where housing is more affordable. Industrial- Development - The backbone of a good community providing jobs and tax revenues. Also the business sector and Regional Shopping Centers should be booming in this era, • TEN YE..RS: We need to monitor conditions for changing community needs, new state and Federal laws and use of city's resources in attaining our Jr development goals. With time, population and problems change, • our goals may need to be redefined. Every issue that comes before the Planning Commission is probably a major issue to someone and should be treated as such. 9 "` "f °`� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �yY 6 �, rs 197 - -- CITI'ZE:;'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Planninq Commission NAME ADDRESS 10155 Magnolia Street PHC;iE (7141 987 -99(5 OCCUPATION Property Managemen` EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) b.A._ Val lev College, Van Nuys Calif., Associate in Arts O g e Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please • list. Tuesday, until July 1 1982 Why are you interested in this position? I want to be more involved with H". d anni.ng of uur ri tv'•; rutnre. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? My excari ence an,l bacn n'nuad in Real estate ;d an.�g�menC will. :•nah lc me to enders Clad and recognize the imnacr of the r`r,nosals which are suhmittvli to the vlanninu Commission. REFERENCES; 1. Jon Mikels 2. Ch, ck bu,"Int PlOa tle attach a written statement containing any additional infer - mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. a POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RA,'CIIGCI :CA51f1yGA:CAI,IFOHSIA91760 • (710999.1651 R02ERT D. DUTTON P.O. Box 721 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 907 -9966 • EDUCATION Los Anceles Valley College, Van Nuys, California. Majored in Real Estate. Awards: Associate of Arts Degree - June, 1972 Certificate in Real Estate - June, 1971 Who's Who Among Students American Junior Colleges - 1971 -1972 LICENSES Real Estate Broker's License - State of California - December, 1971 Real Estate Salesman License - State of California - January, 1970 WORK EXPERIENCE Security Management Company - Administrative Director - 1972 to Present Supervision of total operation including resident manager training programs and maintenance contracting. Security Management Company was organized in 1972 specializing in the renovation of income properties for sale. Primary involvement was 22 to 250• units. In 1976, the company moved from the San Fernando Valley and relocated in the City of Ontario, California, and now supervises several projects in the San Bernardino County area, and Denver, Colorado. Professional Property Management Company - Field Supervisor - 1962 -1972 Worked primarily in project analysis and supervision of on -site management activites while attending Los Angeles Valley College. Professional Property Management Company was organized in 1968, and grew to over SO apartment buildings in Southern California, plus a number of hotels. Projects ranged in size from single - family residences to multi -unit complexes in excess of 200 units. CIVIC INVOLVEMENT San Fernando Valley Board of Realtors Legislative Affairs Committee - 1973 -1975 Van Nuys Airport Kiwanis - President - 1975 -1976 Vikings of Scandia Rancho Grande %iwanis Real Estate Certificate Institute West San Bernardino County Board of Realtors West -End YMCA - Century Club • Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce I 1 Li ROLE OP PLANNING COMMISSION I feel the role of the Planning Commission, as it relates to the community, is co muni. cation. The majority of the input from the citizens in any given area should primarily be obtained in the public hearings of the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission does it's job thorouuhly, in recognizing the impact of a given development to the surrounding neighborhoods, I feel this will greatly decrease the amount of time that you, the City Council, will have to spend on the final 'approval, or disapproval, of the proposals presented to you for consideration. In evaluating the proposals which are presented, the Planning Commission should make full use of the Staff, particularly the Community Development Department, in obtaining all necessary facts and information needed to make recommendations to the City Council. • The recommendations made by the Planning Commission to the City Comsil should substantial weight. I feel the Planning Commission can be a valuable asset to the City Council in making policy decisions, re• :idi ^^ ... _o^missioners jndge tho proposal, presented, based on the uuality, compatibility, and impact on services, rather than allowing timmsuly. to 'OCome swaved by tt.e cmoticna c! special interest groups. Recpoctfull'. :mbmittcd by Robert D. Dutton L' 'r MAJOR PLANNING ISSUES • One of the major issues that will face the Planning Commission this coming year will be the Etiwanda Community Specific Plan. In finalicirg the Plan, it will be essential to not only provide for harmonious new development to the existing development, but also it will be equally important that the final proposal will compliment the General Plan to insure sound and sensible development for all of Rancho Cucamonga. Durinq this same period, it will also be essential for the Planning Commission to continue working on our City's new zoning ordinance. Within the next five years, we must be able to fully implement all elements of the General Plan, primarily in the area of our industrial growth. I feel we should take a very positive attitude in encouraging new businesses to locate within our City. I fool .within the next 10 ,years, the Route 30 Corridor should become a • reality, with or without State and /or Federal financial support. This Corridor, .n my opinion, is essential in eliminating future traffic congestion within the northern section of our City. I feel rhat it is important for a Planning Commissioner to remember that the work we ^:a today will provide the foundation for the future growth of pur Co,unit'l. Rancho Cucamonga is and will coot inuc growing. It is our jab W provide the guidelines and standards to insure the high quality of life we all want in Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted by Robert D. Dutton • Ck'C " °`� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � IAA U: J 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: - 'I'�..... ,.,...._,....-n NAM ''. J'!en ADDRESS n_, 7.),,, i37 % ^1 FiiOii° OCCUPATION JSF n "in °P EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) 11 REFERENCES: if 3. .;:.ICI ^,l until ::U, 1;, I;:,_) Pluaue attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE RO %807 • RANCHO CCCAMONC.A. CALIFORN'IA91790 • (711)989.1851 Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. O • 'vnl_ ' Why are you interested in this position? ::i 7` c 7 _ n Ai :n` :. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? , ,...,. ....31:.10. ^.. 11 REFERENCES: if 3. .;:.ICI ^,l until ::U, 1;, I;:,_) Pluaue attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE RO %807 • RANCHO CCCAMONC.A. CALIFORN'IA91790 • (711)989.1851 May 7, 1982 9496 La Vine Rancho Cucamonga, California • 91701 Honorable Mayor and City Council: My name is Diane Dyan. Attached you will find my application for the position of Planning Commissioner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As a resident of this area my entire life, I have witnessed the growth and development of our city with interest and concern, and as a result have chosen Rancho Cucamonga to establish my business and home. In my business I deal with people on a personal basis. I am aware of the opinions of a wide cross - section of our residents. In addition, my activity with the Chamber of Commerce has provided me with an insight to the business needs of the community. I understand the responsibility of the planning commission in its advisory capacity to the City Council. • With my experience in the community and true concern for the future of our City, my presence as a member of the Planning_ Concnission would be an asset to Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, l //) 4 0 I u I/ IM Submitted by Diane 7yan May 10, 1982 • !hat do you see as the major planning issues facing the .,ity in the neat year, five years and ten years? o .l.y, my perception of Rancho Cucamonga ten years from no., Is a city :pith all the essential qualities necessary for r vibrant, ;;ell- rounded community, one ¢mich incor: rates a bind of these elements: • properly managed growth • sell alanned housing developments • adequate utilities and energy resources * flourishing business and industry * solid tax base narks and recreational facilities * cultural centers • healthy environment + schools * churches • historic preservation • complimentary useage of land bordering the City • .r :;ome issues facing the ;ommission during the next year include the 'iti :•:ands specific !,Ian and the Jevelo=cnt Code. Pi;e, of :c rc 'lan shoui :robe r,-,v4 ecd nd __ctu di ad :insure it c,nt *.sues to =t the needs the community nnr;y.•nn :ionnin; r, ;,ur -.: .ii . .ac; tiro is „i aunty to our ......nulli G;j Gii .y anl' aCiuituulj cs �,p }: �cn •1.i? 'Yl L -i, in the next ,year, as with each year, advance alanning using • the Seneral Plan long; term 5oalc. as a guideline, will help us This should be forefront in achieve these the minds cf u.nnin;; :u;amicsior,err; as they maize their ducisions. is sc, nt`al since i.t iefines ti :e «irec 5..i.on • .r :;ome issues facing the ;ommission during the next year include the 'iti :•:ands specific !,Ian and the Jevelo=cnt Code. Pi;e, of :c rc 'lan shoui :robe r,-,v4 ecd nd __ctu di ad :insure it c,nt *.sues to =t the needs the community nnr;y.•nn :ionnin; r, ;,ur -.: .ii . .ac; tiro is „i aunty to our ......nulli G;j Gii .y anl' aCiuituulj cs �,p }: �cn •1.i? 'Yl L -i, .. Submitted by Diane Jyan May 10, 1962 that is your perception of the role of the Commission in relation to the e ^mmunity, City Staff and the City Council? . ?iambr:rs of the Planning Commission must be unified in their ;miss to internat n- sitively. This sets the foundation a.a.-,:•ro rk. .7ith droner internal organization and a spirit °f ~fairness, the Plannin; Commission can well serve the ., c:rnsni cy as a feedback mechanism to inform the City Council ap:ut what people think and want in community planning, and :where the community's best long -range interests lie. The :Manning Commission has a commitment to the welfare of the community. he Planning Commission works in partnership with the City ?lanninC Staff. The City Staff provides relevant technical information for evaluation by the Commission. They also zrovido the resources for technical or legal assistance. Based upon technical information, as presented by the City Staff, and testimony by the public, the Planning Commission draws out and clarifies the positions of people on all sides of on issue and then makes decisions or recommendations to the City Council for their action. The Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council. r�L • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF RAN610 CUCAMONCA AOMINIS fRFiIDN p' APR 2619 82 AM - 18191W1U1121112131415 (; CITI °E "I'S ACPLICATION TO SERVE 0:1: Planning Commission NAME Jefferson E. Hill 3r. ADDRESS 907 .Cameron Street, Cucamon6a, California 91737 i;HUA (711 +) Q3Q -5333 OCCNPAT13N Defense Industry EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) : ?A 'University Of Northern Colorado, ;reeley, Colorado JA Chansan College, Orange, California Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. • Why are you interested in this position ?I derive treat satisfaction_ 9 from vo':onteerim; sy services and exner.ise to a worthwhile ra:,se in my cram- unity. :o se nothin, could he more worthwhile than olanninrc the future (note 1' What do you consider to he your major qualifications? excellent inter - personal skills, ;ood comnuHcator and listener. Exnerienced in all nha;es of nlannine :3tart',ne with the formulation of the nlannin,, nersoective and ,(note B) REFERENCES: 1, Dr. '.4illiam R. Endsley, 3735 Avalon, Alta Loma, Ca. 91 ?01 (939 - 4741 :. z. Mr. Jean R. Barnes, 1523 Fast 7th Street, Ontario, Ca. 91764 (932 -3249) 7 ' "rs. Bessie Clark, 219 North suclid Ave., Ontario, Ca, 91712 (937 - 2734) Dustin J. 91jr,rin, •i594 Pear Ave. Etiwanda, Ca. 91719 (399 -1504) Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be usnful to the City Council. POSTOFFICEROI807 • RANCIIOCCf ,A11ON(;A.CAI,IFORNIA91790 • (711)999.1851 Jefferson C. Fill, Sr. • direction of our city, 7ancho Cucamonga, California. :ate: B ending with the successful implementation of the plan. Able to critically evaivate different proposals and alternatives. Skilled in contract ne,;otiteti ocs. Leadership abilities as evidenced by my past experience: J ,3A?, 22 years; American Cancer Society, Board Member; VPd, organization of-he local 'J -d post and served as the first Sonior Vice Commander; Church activities, task force in the organization of Northkirk Qnitad Presbyterian Church in our community. r� L_J 11 • JEFFERSON E. HILL, SR. (Additional Information) * UNDERGRADUATE COURSES IN REAL ESTATE, MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, * ATTENDED CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING MEETINGS SINCE EARLY 1918. * I AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND INDUSTRIAL PLAN. *^ RENTER: MOBILE HOME, APARTMENT HOUSE BUYER: CONDOMINIUM, HOUSE • . FAMILIAR, WITH THE PROS AND CONS OF ALL THESE PHASES OF LIVING. 0 * DURING MY AIR FORCE CAREER I OBSERVED THE WHOLE SPECTRUM OF POPULATION CENTERS WITH GROWTH AND THEIR PROBLEMS FROM SMALL RURAL COMMUNITIES TO LARGE METROPOLITAN CITIES, Jefferson Hill, Sr. 9507 Cameron Street Cucamonga, Ca. 917 ?0 1. What do you see as the major planning issues facin; the city in • the n^_xt year, five years, ten years? think these situations will continue for our city for the next one, five and ten years: • ?looi control for our community. • Zonire: of residental, commercial, industrial areas and stayin, with the elan. • ;eneral Plan etc, should differentiate between residential, commercial and industrial areas. • Crowth of traffic as our city continues to grow and must be planned. • Interplay of the Ontario .Airport and our city - one question needs to be asked will our industrial area just become storage warehouses for tie air+uort? The city must track the expansion of the ainort and t:a effect it will have on our city. • Decreased budget funds from the federal and state and the impact it will *ive or. our city government etc. • ,rowth .must be planned as well as controlled, • ,a our city -rows so will crime and vandalism and this should always be under cont -ol. • �"mnloyment for our residents as more and more people are losing their jobs, • Seeking volunteers to work for our city instead of creatia; different departments and staff. • Disaster plan for our city i.e., airplane crashes, earthquakes, fires, • train disasters and flood, etc. • ' ir codes ;^led to be examined and updated as our growth conti:u_S. (3oo'a shccild :.a nam'rar ono an the agania) • r____ zjr .adical aaar;aocy aerrice. • vo...,.. a,:slnesc nff;ce gym^ , claw chac% on ,.._ buziners 'h.at o�an and close in our city - lower Archibald is an example. • Detail. Development Plan for our city so that o-_ rasidanta will ;now tha, aa+r -hay buy a ,law house a shappins aencershould not go u? H,o- unless it is in +he plan. • TYCe ani i'flent.)r•! of '{'iat 4e have 1n `Ur ]l:J /.e. what We need. • Build our city ay desiPn anal not by ohauca. is Ir-I • Jefferson S. iIill, Sr. 9507 Cameron 3treat. Cuoamonra, Ca. 91770 2. 'dhat is your parcention of the role of the commission in reiatiors -. t^ comaunity, city staff, city council? , .,cup ion of the r�'_e of the c mission is `,o work as a taam ^: :mLer... i ,join'. "fort to Luild our city. The planning commision an extension of tha n,y Council and answere to the - Council. :tn a aember of the plannivt; commission, I will isten and communic- ate with the residents, developers, special interest groups etc., but 1 4111 decide independently on the merits of each particular is. -_o. ? inow tt� :. ? will ba able .o coapetently vote on the key ...suea they cc *e before the commission. use the "eneral Plan and Industrial Plan as a guideline .c. "Si nr my decisions. I an looki. ,g forward to developer; the .', onir.- di^ince and Davelopment Cedes for our city: I think an a:alysis of past City Council minutes will be a start in the zoning ,linanca p.o^ -ess since some items have already been discussed i.e., parking of trailers on resid^_ntal streets etc. The city staff works for the city manager and the Ci tv Council. The c staff are advisers to both the City Council and the Planning . Commi ,slop. i think a priority list of projects that need to be r=_searc'nei should be given by the planning commission to the city staff to h ter ...114.ze their e °for: and the sags of eaoh project ;no;.d rcc.ectad at :..,:edu_::d neetincs. .1 *cva all coamunica- :an t_..e en the ^as_'.ns of our city and city rovortm3nt nust remain open. • I�� J.E. HILL 9607 Cameron Street • Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 9 Juty 1930 City !.lanagen City o5 Rancho Cucamonga P.U. Box 906 Rancho Cucamonga, Cati. oani.a 91730 Deat Sin: 1 am toohing bonwand to aertving on the Rancho Cucamonga Peanning Commi6eion. Pteane bind enctoeed an apptication o5 my intent. . Thank you boa your time and interte6t. • JEH:aj Sineenety, J. E. HiitP n r • CITY 01r RANCHO CUMMONGA APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN.SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission • COMMITTEE NAME JEFFERSON E, HILL (JEFF) 9607 Cameron Steet, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 PHONE Home: (714)989 -5333 SENIOR TRAINING SPECIALIST Work: (213)331 -0011 EOCCUPATION xt N 6 EDUCATION: ( list highest year completed and all degrees) mN - PsXchology University of Northern Colorado,'Greeley, Colorado BA - Psychology Chapman College, Orange, California Are there any workday evenings you could not meet ?. If so, please list. Why are you interested in this position? Foe continued gaowth, 6tabiti.ty and oppvttunity, Rancho Cucamonga must be a balanced community. Achievement o6 this batance begins with the Ptanning Comm.i66ion. • What do you consider to be your major qualifications? A concertned citizen - witting to become. "involved "; the abitity to netate to people and issues; an open mind; and the ability to 60nmutate a togi.cat, unbiased ptan 06 action 6nom the ;(acts pa.esented. REFERENCES: I. Rev. Gerald D, Lyman, 6259 Opal Street, Alta Loma, California (714) 980 -0446 MTT- 2. Dr. James A. Gardner, 1423 Oxford Ave., Claremont, California 621 -3636 3. Mrs. Bessie Clark, 219 No. Euclid, Ontario, California (714. Please attach a written statement containing any additional information YOU feel would be useful to the City Council. i u • E 7234 Hellman Ave. Alta Loma, Calif. 91701 Phone: 909 -1007 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho, Cucamonga 91730 Attention: James Frost, mayor Dear Mayor Frost: I would like to take this opportunity to introduce myself to you and the city council as a candidate for one of the seats on the proposed planning commission. I am married and the father of four children. I am currently an employee of the State of California (Dept, of Corrections - Calif. Rehab. Center), with appro){imately sixteen years service, most of which has been spent in a supervisory capacity. I am a veteran, having served approXimately four years of active duty with the U.S. marines Corps. I have a high school diploma, along with two college degrees and other certificates of technical proficiency received from local and state colleges and universities. I have worked with forestry officials in the operation of fire and /or forestry conservation camps. I have served on numerous com- munity boards as a member of the board of directors and /or as an officer, including the vice - chairmanship or a Community Action Agency (OEO) and presidency of a Homeowner's Association in the communities where I have resided. The reason I would like to serve on the planning commission is to help you and the council demonstrate to the community that our city government intends to be "servants of the people" and respon- sive to all segments, not just "spacial interests ". lhave no preconceived ideas regarding formulation of planning policies. I have no "special interest" constituencies except the best interests of the whole community. In closing, I would like to say I feel that there are urgent matters facing this proposed commission as well as all of the rest of the city government. Further, I feel some prio_lrlity will have to schools, streets, floods control and sewage evironmental C ncerns. I error my services and time to you and to our community and will serve willingly and faithfully if selected. (Yours tru }y, /�� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi/ ONGA CITIZEN'. AP?i.ICATION TO SERVE OS: V °/4m /V ADO RE /S .gCy�� P 1! -N %I �% /� /'��WI OCCUPATIO:: L.Ga G.C♦ ED2CAT.JN: (list highest year completed and all degrees) are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. `i0 Why are you interested in this position ?__ nnat do you consi'a,vr to be your major quali Cicationsl 1. /%1 ^�. l(� /'•J�::rl.//LZGIv ^.'li' -% l •�'G -' - �o� /�i �e.'P e,(e �(..�Cf ,/ � �eC/r4ctc- 2..L;YCL� /^'Z L�'.iyt.eem -, '1o: P 1.: a':e n c 1 a written sta temp I t con tai n irt�l any add i ti 0 t I 1 i1) ar - matlon V I (ncI wnu1,1 be u•:¢fu] to tho C1t'J Council. 1'o3 'f lif ri l'11 uoxloUi • Il. \N'( 11111' I' CAM 0 NG A, CA I, 1 Poll S I, \91730 • (711)989.1X51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA aYGy,,, 4c'O� ix i> a X1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: NAME John A11P.^. Huggins ADDRESS c .^•'. L H, ,c; erue :anc '^n C,zc'..mu F' . Cal.i _fev_..'`a _0_1730 PRONE � 7'' -1 -'I''1 OCCUPATION "Opt, 2Ctcr EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list, Why are you interested in this position ?? •.:1'e� ;r n.. .•d .', r tN; What do you consider to be your major qualifications? 2. J.. Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. • POST OFFICE BOX 907 • RANCIIOCUCAHONGA ,CALIFORN1A91739 • (714)989-1851 ePn• .-.�'. .1. 'DOS np.cis`'O'1 e nd S ? ?PP" fOP 'i :uCI]VP it Nn PS. REFERENCES: 2. J.. Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. • POST OFFICE BOX 907 • RANCIIOCUCAHONGA ,CALIFORN1A91739 • (714)989-1851 Yi 4 • ,A l:pril 29, 1962 CST" 0: ft C-'C.•. t:iXA Utject: i2e5U6.e nCo� "2:S Ion plan : E in the ccnstructicn Tielda'oil`ne e bee. In the Los �.n €eles tree as .d teen a I have Watched r;at 2. Years. ;;urrourdir -€ cotxtihetTpl.;th and develo »:cent. wor':tin€ pert cf lo9ed with Alex in' Cor0j. o. $1. ;;t t is t:.ce� ter 5ggeasbeeFoI'�•i � ears in business for for the Ptst 1 . n General Received a Con rectors License g a Licen:e in I mm in the Process cf obtainin6 vngirv_ering• Coma to narct' Trcr.. Or:.n€ Y _ o rac ?a ,.ren. +rte rco`.cd 1 ::n r..ar'l"' and h, F 1m` t rs y o ex:s cT age' this area• Yer.. interested in t:'.e develop::ent T Si��'elY� V / Soi:n i +11en 8u €B i" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •~' D Z 1977 CITIZENS APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: AP.JISCEY Coro-;rsrCN NAME john Allen Huggins ADDRESS F.22u uelns Avenue Rancho Cur= FOnra1 C•li£orni A1770 PHONE (71%) os9-5411 OCCUPATION Centractor EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list._ Why are you interested in this Position?T ;.;E JnterpFteA {., th • rr,elcrr..cnt snd ,.,t), Of this ar. n What do you consider to he your major qualifications? for r..akinc. rocd decisions and se•:rrh fo^ - wo ira Ch,j " rE REFERENCES: 1. :: -, 7J::ily _,.Ui GOr 6r, ^I7L 2. "y Fleyj'. s !7141 0(' �P51 Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. 0 POST0FFICBBOE007 0 RANCNOCUCANNOONGA , CALIFORNIA 91730 0 (711)909.1031 :i i Aeril 29, 19E? Sul.ject: Resume for advisory Co:rdssion . eve been in the construction fielc for the past 25 years. In the Los Angeles area Lnd all s:.rro,ndiag c c�:..uni. t i es. T_ have watched anc been a i-or'.ring ;art of the grc:.th ant' developr..ent. Had been er.:ployed with Ale:: Robertson Cont. for ten years. For the past 5 years in Lusiness for myself. :;e oi,,ed a Con rectors License in 1981. .:t this tire, I ar in the process of obtaining a Lice::se in General Engi..ecring. • ':;e moved from Cranpe Co my to R:.ncho Cuca,..onge, 5 yo rs ago. ? ar.. -arrieO and have n trandchil ^ren. .. 1�7 years of afe. Very intere;;ted in the develop.:.,cnt of this area. 70rely, C�/-- John Allcnt Hvggins • GccaA7o ni6l-_ t) -- 1" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM6N "G`i�''N`NRiie�'°N 71819oW#Uj121112(3(413 8 19 ?7 O CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON:PlanninSI Commission Or Parks NAME ADDRESS PO Box 352, 12925 Wilson, EtiWanda Rancho Cucamonga t11235 PHONE 714 -899 -1921 OCCUPATION Business Woman EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Two years of Colle e Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please • list. No Why are you interested in this position? I have always been interested our Cities Government and have always been active in i affairs. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? My knowlece of the comunity, Director Chamber of Commerce, Co- chairman Ambassador Club. Charter - member of the emblem Club. Active during General Plan hearings, et REFERENCES: • 1. Richard Dahl. Councilman 2. James Frost, Councilman 3. Jeff Se n:nl:.,, Director Ch.unicr of Conine rce Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. P/ISTOFFICEHO%M17 • RANCIIOCIiCASIONOA.CAI.IFOR \1.!91730 • (710989 -1851 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: L� "'':'� �i_Ct• NAME 'h >rvl ^odv ADDRESS Je^.efte ;k.L. PHONE - OCCUPATION' ome"akar-- T ?acher EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) ,70 3C •n = .r'i,_ `or 2Ie�. :redential, %75 ?onrix. Are there any workday evenings you could not mast? If so, please • list. Why are you interested in this position? -.rder t� haves -Clls it the deyel' ent if 7v cfto. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? ..e attached stat?7�t, ul ?.ise. REFERENCES: 1. r. ind r<. rhfI ircicci -3-.8 Jadeite, ;C71 • r nom., a, 1 , = ,,,Cho eli,- ;Z. , 9th f1 ^Ivd. DR7 - 7-Oj o.rner Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. #��' POSTOFFICNNOXOM a RANCNOCUCAHONOA,CAL(FORNIA91170 0 (714)109-1.11 ?r, 1h2 cit'. 1 have All i- a^ ^I it for a DisItion on the ; lannin Co-^ission 'or : have • or r ?�Csntiv, had the opportunity overn-ental crocess. It has lb-cI- --rot '.-er, ere en -e fl-ec*ions tefr- taken r -1; sr I on vi, I ch the c I t1 tens of ?ancllln Cuca-n P - a -ra -,t 21 It Is easy to sit back and co.molain. m� I , I i the 000ctunl--y to be a part of the system. v -,un! basical !v that I hove a desire to 1 —10. T 'nave-r�ver 'Zaan fnvo:vnol to citk, 71 b- -y r'ates'. .Fset. I have I colas r.q -,r v= it ,,chco I, both as a Sub sm I tute and a- a I u -, C� cl,c9rin- teacher. Frisenzly, I i* not :�orkfni. I Pm it nom. •litr ^v tNo t^ve. %'y husband is employed at 'eneral -19 'aldy to ;qck ne in Vita aPolicatioll. • nor ;i of I feel t ^,- ,... -,ho x e,)c;e ca--ir• to the area are interested in a Z'l V c; L i 1 rm I Y ,jinn t r - - r n I c rc i ?r, 1h2 cit'. 1 have All '1)1 L N", I, j_,ils For t-,,- fvtur- am to -r---ote ins, r. r i -,nc;.ntrol I rj,- t h r. t i I tv I 2ter. rl qnr.1 n i :rut- are -KICtlY ?I P I nd I C I t e d L I �us' Privi 3e v e.1 ..l pli cat Clan In tar-8 ,f our city's ',utura. I,-r r "Is -u4t bs ably tq be orijecteJ for iv-, -n --ty ears fitxr. )! -P -Alit ;r �—rS ^r 1z e in- i bOf-nci. r •n alr r!l 111: °. r 7r Vi that -e cir h-ncl e- - - nd not r?lret fk=r. 4e Carl 10 1,,fPate th? roomy -av- US by cirtroIlqd c!ivelio-ent alin: It. *liu h-fui :A3nnI n . C-7 C r and 7he CT—unfty hro Ov err i,i h, dY . T A e Council v r u t -R4e ov�r ej-e � n �,j i t y P.e as a r2,:l 7i 1 r-C. sh.Ul-be than just 2, i 1^ r-latfono.hj, tn the -he valijity Of various I -. L -'a P.L. pU2 '. be able to jud7s .-hether or not -y ::irticjj :- project is -.1hat the community •.vants as well inzoriorated In order to have a ^ore in city %overr-P.nt. it eem-ns to :re the im_ wrens for a 1115CU-9iDn and afrin: differences f '.ere •oll irre_-arcil3ble differences that o -'s - t3f', anl '_1T:roVnItv--at this ooirt -1ma '.Is -3t'ar rust be turned over to the Council :r ' firal er h?velri r?vi•-�^sj all reports ral atin , tp the ,zCjclo,. I I pelf eve t^at the -.C. has a re-onnsibi 1 ity to act In ' Of '-' ;,uncl I . 'it needs to lake decisions that rqll-lve Councille tf-e--but decisions that are it accordance to -cuncil •cals and aopiratlons. . 16-K- LJ �[ra Co. c� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 19177 7 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: �%r NAME /I�r i 1�� 12,0r, ADDRESS 'l'� t. Ir , % L'. /� / +_ r_ . PHONE OCCUPATION EDUUCATION! (list highest year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please • list. Why are you interested in this position? F What ♦do you consider to be your major qualifications? REFERENCES: I. PtJI' %t i :s- ,— Are -, � z. Mn, %I u- SAIrV,4 9,F7 1. ;� .I 1,, .,1�n;�.�r.. 17 c, r , Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor. mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POSTOFFICEBOE907 6 RA \CIIOCUCA510NCA,CALIFORRIA91 750 a (714989.1851 "G ""°`C, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Planning Commission NAME Sharon Romero ADDRESS 8242 Rosebud Street, 91701 PHONE-987-8027 OCCUPATION Teacher EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) B.A. plus standard California life teaching credential Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. No • Why are you interested in this position? After having served in an advisory capacity, I was interested in having more input into City policies What do you consider to be your major qualifications? School Task Force in 1978; Committee on Schools in 1978; General Plan Committee; • Heritage Park Committee; Vice President of Northwest Foothills Homeowners k2a1r..�Nand Citizens Advisory Commission 1 2 3. Dennis Stout Please attach a written statement ccntaining any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POSTorricHBO%807 • RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • (7141989-1851 Ti iIA 1977, • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: NAME &Pf, AI ,S��//F[L/Jl}N/I ADDRESS 96/f r'>N[ Q°. 91 PHONE _p(e�''QOja OCCUPATION (nit '--yog 060�y/ EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) —41& ZOM.4 s hoe/ /9. Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. 00Ne. Why are you interested in this position? �r AM .¢ C /Yir njm,I —t j:fjhjcn uhn /s .irr��Frrick/J n his { / ✓ter yin4/1s oftluiCbnvrrv�[, What do you consider to be your major qualifications? 77 �.�'!! - -1• e�y )nualueA wilA �tll foam, of i�• co✓�� � �i- as wc{I as 6v gyp,,;, ,1 fn ty„ Adv[wy elod7 y// 55 /Oq REFERENCES: CAL MCEI(alA — 3813 -2811 '. _ Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation •• /ou feel would be useful to the City Council. POSTI/FFRE BOX 807 0 R.WI'1111 CCCA \111NI ;AA, I'ALIFOR \I, \917J0 4 p1119N9.IP51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IIA U,i > 1977 I-I J • CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: RkQslmlya ,G ss; OV NAME .Sti gTTRC14Gc.� _ ADDRESS PHONE OCCUPATION EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. Why are you interested in this position? Yi 3Le /A- What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Se-e, P.t'Twe *rz0 - REFERENCES: 1.%LS t.z &w Q /9) 37 1—SW 2 • J. V. 7"N• 1c'L% 1. 1 C, Tr ReST Please att.ich a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCiOCC C.UIIISCA.CAI.IFBt \IA91730 • 010989•I8SI P. y RESUME OF Otis R. Smile ' 8307 Whirlaway, Street • Alta Lose Ca 91701 (714) 989.2483- Home (213) 572 -1374- Office Personal Birthdate: August 4, 1935, St. Louis, Missouri Data: Martial Status: Married Height: 5' 10" Weight: 160 Education: Associate Art Degree. Los Angeles Trade -Tech- 1971 Major: Business Administration. G.P.A. 3. Bachelor Of Science Degree. Pepperdine University, Los Angles, 1974 Major: Business & Management G.P.A. 3. Professional Experience: Accountant, Financial Accounting Division Southern California Edison Co. • Rosemead,. Ca. 1967- Present Duties consist of: Reconciliation of District bank accounts, accrual, discount,, expense, and amortisation of long term debts. Write -off of interest accounts, Cash investments, Long tern Notes, Commerical Paper, and Master Notes. Auditor. Southern California Edison Co. Employees - Federal Credit Union. El Monte, Ca. 1977-79 To assist management in the effective discharge of its responsibilities by independently reviewing and evaluating the effectiveness of operations and control and providing findings and recommendations in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Military; 1958 -60 • Hobbies: Music, Poetry 0 OTIS R. SCAILS 8107 WHIRLAWAY STREET ALTA LOMA, CALIFORNIA 91701 (714) 989 -2483 - Residence (213) 572 -1374 - Business OBJECTIVE Exposure to all areas of corporate management is desired, immediate use of talents could be in areas of cost benefit analysis, administration, revenues or expense in compliance vith Company and Regulatory requirements. CAPABILITIES Well organized, disciplined, self starter who clarifies objectives, identifies relevant information, plans, organizes and controls course of action to achieve the desired results. EDUCATION BS Degree in Business Management; Pepperdine University Los Angeles, conferred 1974 AA Degree in Business Administration; L. A. Trade Tech Los Angeles, conferred 1971 /7) WORK EXPERIENCE 6/75 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. Financial Accounting Division • to present Position: Accountant Principle Duties: Coordinate and analyse information of Company operations to prepare accounting and financial reports and various reports required by management and regulatory commissions. Responsible for maintaining the general ledger books and three subsidiary companies and prepare appropriate statements and reports. Coordinate reconciliation of District Bank accounts, accrual, discount, expense, and amortization of long term debts. Approve, write -off of interest accounts. 10/71 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. Financial Accounting Division to 6/75 Position: Reports Accountant Principle Duties: Reconcile and account for all fuel purchased, burned and stored, and energy generated, power purchased, borrowed and returned. Review or prepare monthly, quarterly and annual Company financial publications. Provide guidance and assistance to Franchise Tax Board Auditors during annual audit of the • Company's lobbying activities. Reconciliation of Deferred Debit b Credit Accounts. 4/77 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. EMPLOYEES FED. CREDIT UNION' to 4/79 Position: Auditor (Asst. Chairman Supervisory Committee) Principle Duties: Conduct, or cause to be made, such audits of Credit Union operations to assure conformity to policy and procedures and to ensure adequacy of controls; review investment portfolio for controls and legality. Make annual report to membership. Consult with Board of Directors. Other LAWRENCE GIMBEL 6 ASSOCIATES Position: Financial Consultant Principle Duties: Responsible for establishing individual group Life 6 Disability Accents, annutles, savings, and investments. PERSONAL DATA Married Height: 5'10 -1/2" • Birth Date: August 4, 1935 Weight: 160 lbs. Birth Place: St. Louis, Mo. Health: Excellent Reference available upon request n 0 January 19, 1978 Ranch Cucamonga City Council Ranch Cucamonga, California Attention: Mayor Frost Dear Sir: Please accept this as my letter of application for consideration to the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission. Enclosed is my qualification summary for your evaluation. • As you and the other council members know, I am very interested and concerned in the affairs of our community. I thank you very much for your consideration. 'Very trul yours, MT. Kay Trujillo.: 0 QUALIPICATICN SUbi ARY C • Ray Trujillo 6656 Nast Avenue Etiwanda, California 1977 • t • PERSONAL DATA SKEET NAkE• Ray Trujillo ADDrtESS: Residence - 6656 East Avenue, Etiwanda, Calif. PRONE (714) 899 -1092 DATE OF BIRTH: December 27, 1929 MILT• 5 Feet, 8 inches WEIGHT: 170 Pounds MARITAL STATUS: Married a EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE: 1975 - Present 2 Years Teacher, 2nd Grade Cucamonga Elementary School, Cucamonga School District, San Bernardino County, California 1971 - 1975 4 Years District Superintendent, Cucamonga School District, San Bernardino County, California 1970 - 1971 1 Year Acting Superintendent, Cucamonga School District, San Bernardino County, California 1965 - 1969 4 Years Principal, Los Amigos Jr. High, Cucamonga School District, San Bernardino County, California 1963 - 1965 2 Years Teacher - Principal, Los Amigos Jr. High, Cucamonga School District, San Bernardino County, California 1958 - 1963 5 Years Teacher, Grades 4rh and 7th, Cucamonga Elementary School, Cucamonga School District, San Bernardino County, California UILITARY SEitVICE Volunteered USN December 6, 1950. Served with Military Air Transport Squadron Eight, Honolulu, Hawaii 1951 -1953; Utility Squadron @even, San Diego, California, 1953 -1954. Honorable discharge, October 24, 1952 -'K Petty Officer First Class 1954; Top Secret Clearance a CALII'OajiIA CREDK- PIALS: General Elementary - Life • Elementary Administration - Life EDUCATIONAL TRAIUIJiG: Year Institution Degree Area 1959 - 1965 California State University M.A. Adm. At Los Angeles 1956 - 1958 California State University B.A. Gen. Elem. 'Credential 1954 - 1956 Chaffey Junior College Ontariov California A.A. GRADUATE COURSES Sub.iect Field Instructor Institution Units Public School Business Lanagement Hall CSULA 3 Law & Public School Jacobson CSULA 3 Educational Sociology Neal CSULA 3 Organization & Administration of Elementary School Bishop CSULA 3 Principals & Practices of C Curriculum Tonge CSULA 3 • Tests, Measurements & Evaluation CSULA 2 Fundamentals of Counseling and Guidance CSULA 2 Seminar in School Administration and Supervision Tozier CSULA 3 lodern Math For Elementary School Teachers Frazer UC 3 Orientation to Child Study Krieble UC 3 Organization of School Systems CSULA 2 Personnel School Administration CSULA 2 Child welfare CSULA 3 Juvenile Delinquency CSULA 3 Physical Ed. (x352A heathy UC 2 Laws Relating To Children CSULA 3 Health & Safety Law Jacobson CSULA 3 Behavioral Disorder of Children CSULA 3 The idexican- American in Transition Penaloza UC 3 Seminar in Curriculum Development Olson USC 2 Reading in Sec. Hi. Olson USC 1 Adv. Philosophy of Education Hickerson USC 3 Seminar in the Superintendent Stallings USC 3 0 a 0 PROFESSIONAL OitGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP National: State: CGL&UNITY AC'TIVI'TIES 22ND k. UBERSHIPS Alta Loma Cucamonga Kiwanis Club Cucamonga Parent Teacher Organization Tri- Community Incorporation Committee SU..:;:ARY OF PROPEESIONAL WORK: National Education Association California Teachers Association 1975 - 1977 Teacher Second Grade Cucamonga ementa c o0 'treasurer �5 -1976 President PTO 1976 -1977 1971 - 1975 Sunerintendent - Cucamonga School Dist Represented Board of 'Trustees in the execution of policies; established pattern of education, leadership and counsel in carrying out the educations program; maintained supervision-of physical facilities; supervision of all business activities; supervised payment of all district accounts; prepared annual district budget in cooperation vdth the Board; supervised transportation, operation, maninten- once, cafeteria, and personnel; re- presented the Board of Trustees in routine relationships with business and professional organizations; wrote, made application and directed Head Start, ESEA Title i, 'Title VII, and other State and Federal Projects. 1970 - 1971 Acting superintendent - Cucamonza Sc o— ti—oTDistr c a ova 1965 - 1970 Federal Project Coordinator, Cucamonga• School District Implemented and directed Bead Start Progra. Implemented Title VII Program Implemented National School Lunch Program Implemented Follow Through Program Participated in implementation of Title I, ESEA, Title V HDEA, and other State funded programs. 1963 - 1970 Principal, Los Amigos Junior High, Cucamonga School District Supervision of Personnel: Supervised personnel and participated in the selectio, of faculty for the school. Conducted evaluation of teachers, supervised teacher: professional growth, maintained an awarene: of District needs and reported to the Board of Trustees, maintained file of re- cords and information of all phases of school operation. Supervision of Students: Supervised As. room management andpupil discipline, use of school plant, selection of instructional material, attendance, reporting to parents developing of school policies for all ex- tracurricular activities. Curriculum: Organized and administered semi - departmentalized program for seventh and eighth grade in Foreign Language, Science, Modern Math, Instrumental Music, Chorus, L:echanical Drawing, English, Socia: Studies, Physical Education and Art. Part: cipated in the organization and development of Outdoor Education with the Los Angeles County Schools (selection of program, selection of site and class scheduling). Headed committee on book recommendation for State Text Book adoption. 1962 - 1965 Teacher in charge - Los Amigos School Field Pork for Administrative Credential J ,/ • 1960 - 1962 Teacher, Seventh Grade, Cucamonga Elem. School. Phyical Education Coordinator. Treasurer for Parent - Teachers Club. 1958 - 1960 Teacher, Fourth Grade, Cucamonga Elementary School. PdnSu1VAL BACKGAOUhD Childhood: Grew up in Etiwanda, California. Attended Etiwanda Elementary School. Worked in local area - Citrus Industry, Kaiser and Construction Industry. Language: Write and speak English and Spanish Studied 3 years of German Travel: Japan, Hawaii, Philippines, South Pacific and Far East, 1950 - 1954 (Military Service) Mexico Canada USA t PERSONAL REEExEI`CES Mr. Hoy C. Bill, County Superintendent of Schools San Bernardino County Schools Office 602 South Tippecanoe San Bernardino, California Mr. Grover Clem, Assistant Superintendent of Business San Bernardino County Schools Office 602 South Tippecanoe San Bernardino, California Mr. Ralph Bullock, Assistant Superintendent of Business San Bernardino County Schools Office 602 South Tippecanoe San Bernardino, California Mr. Carleton P Lighfoot, Superintendent Etiwanda School District Etiwanda, California I A U E •