Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1983/06/01 - Agenda Packet
cccn.Npi, CITY OF RANCHO CL'CANIONGA o CITY COUNCIL g AGENDA 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California June 1, 1983 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5 :00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. . B. Roll Call: Buquet_, Dahl , Schlosser_, and Mikels_ C. Approval of Minutes: April 19 and April 20, 1983. 2. ANNOUNCF24ENTS a. Thursday, June 2, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. M 1_ G`�.c�tr ii 3- CONSENT CALENDAR 7 �y; j The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Registers No. 83 -05 -17 and 83 -6 -1 1 and payroll ending 5 -15 -83 in the amount of $498,621.68. b. Forward Claim against the City by Insurance Company of 3 North America to the City Attorney and Carl Warren Co. for handling. c. Forward Claim against the City by Carol Ann Brendel to q the City Attorney and Carl Warren Co. for handling. City Council Agenda -2- June 1, 1983 • d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for on -sale beer 5 and wine public premise license to Darlene H. Schultz, Scotty's Bar, 8890 Eighth Street. e. Request approval to advertise for bids for construction 6 of a storm drain on Beryl Street from Alta Loma Park to 19th Street. f. Request approval to advertise for bids for construction o£-- a-- s2deaa2k on Base Line from Hellman Avenue to Alta /"Loma High School. -' - - - -_` g: Request that the Traffic Analyst position in Engineering \\ 8 be replaced by transfer of an Assistant Civil Engineer, \arid request authorization to recruit for the vacant `\- ;Associate Civil Engineer position. h. Request authorization of $6,216, from Beautification 10 Funds, to fund sidewalk extensions at bridge crossings of the Cucamonga Creek. i. Approval of Parcel Map 7646, surety, and agreement 12 submitted by Calvin Morgan located on the south side of Hillside between Carnelian and Beryl. • RESOLUTION NO. 83 -71 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7646, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. J. Request approval to remove oleander shrubs planted along 20 the Community Trail at 9090 Manz°giita Drive at Beryl. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -72. 22 A RESOLUTION. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A POLICY PROH191TING THE PLANTING OF TOXIC PLANTS ALONG COMMUNITY TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. k. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7834 located on the north side 22 of Via E1 Dorado and the west side of Sunstone, submitted by Jensen. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -73 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7834. City Council Agenda -3- June 1, 1983 0 1. Approval of improvement extension agreement for Minor 26 Development Review 82 -08 located at 8270 Foothill Blvd. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -74 30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82 -08. m. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7832 located at the northwest 31 corner of Hillside and Moonstone Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -75 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7832. n. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6114, bonds, agreement, and 34 lien agreement submitted by William Campbell located at the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Ramona • Avenue. ' RESOLUTION NO. 83 -76 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6114, BONDS, AGREEMENT, AND A REAL PROPERTY CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT. Authorization to extend City offices' lease agreement 37 for one additional year, at existing rate, to expire June 30, 1984. ✓ Request authorization for emergency roof repair at Lions 40 Park Community Center -- not to exceed $4,000. q. Set public hearing date for June 15, 1983 for -- Environmental Assessment and Sign Ordinance Revisions. An amendment to the sign regulations contained in Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. This is a comprehensive amendment intended to improve the administration and to provide for more effective signing. The basic regulations are not being changed. 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSOCIATED ITEMS. Staff ql report by Utt,o Kroutil and Tim Boodle. City Council Agenda -4- June 1, 1983 (1) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW. Staff will briefly review changes made to date and request direction on unfinished topics. In addition, the Council may wish to discuss any portion of the Specific Plan not specifically covered so far. (2) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. Staff will outline changes to be made in the EIR as a result of Specific Plan modifications and present a statement of overriding considerations as recommended by the Planning Commission. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -77 54 IVA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01H AND FOR THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IS COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE. (3) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01B. Staff will briefly • review modifications to the Land Use, Circulation, and Trails Maps that are necessary prior to the adoption of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -78 57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN. (4) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: ADOPTION. If desired, the City Council may consider approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, with modifications as directed. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -79 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. ORDINANCE NO. 203 (second reading) 66 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REGULATORY PROVISIONS SECTION OF THE F,TI'WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP FOR THE ETIWANDA AREA ACCORDING TO THESE PROVISIONS. • City Council Agenda -5- June 1, 1983 SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT: DRAFT GENERAL 68 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -54 VI 69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH HOUSING UNITS PRODUCED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. C. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON GENERAL PLAN 86 AMENDMENT 83 -01A - KANOKVECHAYAHT. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan for medium density residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) to medium - high residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue - APN 227 - 091 -45. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. VACATION OF SERVICE ROAD. Located on the south side of 98 Foothill Boulevard in connection with Parcel Map 6174 submitted by Vista Investment. Item originally set for the March 16 city council meeting. Staff r port by.410k- -OemEz- , -Sit9- Flamer. : r C ♦�(/ RESOLUTION N0. 83 -80 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE (PARCEL MAP 6114). E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -03. An amendment to the residential use standards to allow for second dwelling, units on single family zoned residential lots. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. V ORDINANCE !10. 204 (second reading) 104 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.024A (b) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW FOR SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES. City Council Agenda -6- June 1, 1983 5. ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION None submitted. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. B. REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL (RHAM). Staff will review recommendations on the growth projection for Rancho Cucamonga as expressed in the RHAM. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING REVISION OF THE GROWTH PROJECTIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SCAG 182 AND RHAM HOUSING MODEL. • C. STATUS OF PROPOSED COUNTY SOLID WASTE REFUSE RATE ADJUSTMENT. Oral staff report by Robert Rizzo, Administrative Analyst. D. CHRISTMAS HOUSE REQUEST. A request to review proposal to convert the Christmas House to a Bed and Breakfast Inn. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. E. SETTING OF HEARINGS FOR CONSIDERATION OF FISCAL YEAR 83- 84 PROGRAM OF SERVICE. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. None submitted. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1 9. ADJOURNMENT 106 135 139 141 April 19, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Tuesday, April 19, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 pm by ,Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were Council members: Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip 0. Schlosser, James C. Frost and Mayor Jon 0. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Engineer, Lloyd B. Hubbs, 2. ROUTE 30 WORKSHOP Mayor opened meeting stating that the purpose of the meeting is to discuss the • issue of the Foothill Freeway. He then introduced the consultants, Michael Schneider, Parsona, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc, in association with Al Hollinden and Associates. Mike Schneider, project director, summarized the purpose and schedule for completion of the Route 30 Corridor Study, stating the options are: 1. No Build - 1, no benchmark for comparison 2, releasing acquired right -of -way along corridor 3. protecting acquired right -of -way 2. Freeway - 1, depressed freeway with elevations and full grade separation 3. Expressway - 1, interchanges separated - no signalized intersections 2. partial grade separation 4. Arterial /TSM (Transportation System Management) - 1, arterial rather than freeway 2. transit only corridor 3. hybrid or combination City Council Minutes April 19, 1983 Page 2 Mr. Schneider stated that the financial options or the physical configurations • could be dicussed now. Mayor Mikels opened up discussion for public questions or comments regarding the design configuration. The Mayor briefly summarized the options that the consultant had presented from "No Build" to "Full Freeway" with various alternatives within those two extremes, with cost estimates. Sam Maloof, P. 0. Box 51, Alta Loma said he would like to see a map of the freeway. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer stated the map was available at City Hall and could be loaned out. Mr.Maloof expressed concern that the freeway goes through his property. Mr. Schneider replied explaining alignment, availability of money, and the study of the freeay thus far. He stated specific parcels that would be taken, how much would be paid for them, where would they be acquired - is really the next phase. Mayor Mikels gave a brief summary on the planning that goes into designing a • freeway explaining plans usually start in Sacramento. Further this study is really unique in where the all the corridor communities, La Verne to San Bernardino have input in the design and we need the input from the public. Fred Nelson (property owner, no address given) voiced concern on the ultimate freeway location stating he has property to develop but because of State and City indecision, is unable to do so. Mayor Mikels stated that last year there was $11 million allocated for right - of -way protection along the corridor route. By looking at the map you can find out if your property is in the right of way. Sharon Romero, member of the Advisory Comission, had some questions and comments on placement of underpass, alignment transitioning 19th Street directly to Highland Avenue, and options on b,c, and d with a change of one type of facility up to 1 -15 Mr. Schneider answered that it can be alone or an underpass. He also explained that some of the traffic demand studies that have been done have led to the need for grade separation or full freeway concept to be considered more heavily along the full corridor, The different configurations and their financial aspects are studied as options. City Council Minutes April 19, 1993 • Page 3 Ms. Romero answered that the tools are volume and money rather than the type of use of the area. What is shown on b, c and to an extent d, is residential to the west, a sprinkling of non - residential mixed residential d in with mo as you get further east and then you get into less residential and more commercial /residential so that the economic impact of the freeway is hitting residential as opposed to the non - residential. Mr. Schneider responded that the newer areas of development are being protected and it depends on what type of planning is to be done. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer said that 19th Street turns right up Haven then left where it starts transitioning and bending back in the new Chevron Tract. It is anticipated that we would continue that kind of "S" configuration and join it back into Highland and that would be the new state highway. Highland west of Haven will probably be abandoned. The new tract going through there will complete the new transition. Mayor Mikels asked if there were anymore questions or comments. Councilman Buquet expressed his preference to have a depressed freeway. Councilman Frost expressed his opinion that there would be an expressway east of Highway 15 with grade separation such as in Riverside where Mission meets • Route 60. Mayor Mikels opened up the discussion to the public to comments on any of the financial aspects the consultant presented. Jeff Sceranka, Director of the Chamber of Commerce had a question on equity Participation and what this would entail. Mr. Schneider explained the number of techniques that fall into this category; joint development of a transit station or an interchange; and the concept of private capital, Mr. Sceran:a asked if the private sector were to buy bonds, how would those bonds be paid off? Mr. Schneider replied a good example would be a toll facility. Mr. Sreran' <- al.o asked if the toll road :vas used, would th ni. start at La Verne? Mr. Schneider said that has not been det(1rni:ned. Sam Maloof askef ','i, I)III t,xpiyer will have be tax-1 !his. i vuta in whe Lh e, ha wants to G City Council Minutes April 19, 1983 Page 4 I Mr. Schneider responded that there are techniques that could raise revenue that could not be imposed without voters saying okay. There is a judicial debate underway as to whether 112 or 2/3 of those voters need to say yes. Ms. Romero asked if Mr. Schneider could tell them which of those options would require the vote of the people and which would be lase. Mr. Schneider said that fuel tax - gasoline tax, sales tax on the local level would require a vote of the public. The state can increase the sales tax with a 2/3 vote from each House. Ms. Romero asked about a benefit assessment. Mr. Schneider said that a benefit assessment district would need a vote but not a general vote. Mr. Nelson stated that he would like to hear the Council endorsement of a specific financial system with Rancho Cucamonga taking the lead over the other corridor cities instead of waiting for CalTrans. Mayor Mikels said that one of the purposes of hiring a consultant was to refine potential financial mechanisms and also that Council was not ready to say presently which one or combination or any of the financial techniques would be applicable. He cited problems with various funding mechanisms. • Councilman Dahl further commented that the City is not certain what is going to happen with the federal 5 cent a gallon increase or how will the state view Route 30. He is encouraged by the consultants researching the alternatives of financing and agreed that Council is in no position to make any decision until the final papers are in. Mayor Mikels answered that the study will be completed by December. Further that because of state participation, it is difficult to know what the financial mechanism will be. Mr. Nelson asked if there is a time table for the corridor. Mayor Mikels said that he wished they could tell the state to go ahead and do it now - that option is not available. Councilman Buquet said he would also like this thing pushed ahead but quite frankly the options depend upon state's plans, Mr. Nelson said that since all the cities in the corridor want the freeway built in their city, what seems to be the difficulty in implementation? Mayor Mikels replied - $300 million. u City Council .Minutes April 19, 1983 Page 5 e Mr. Schneider replied that one of the alternatives of the study takes that into consideration. They will outline in the report a very clear set of steps to be taken and the fact that the public may itself have to vote in order to raise that kind of money. It's really not up to the mechanisms that we voted in 1978 under Proposition 13, they are such that we are giving ourselves the option to tax ourselves by a 2/3 vote. Councilman Frost commented on the prior Governor's philosophy. Also, we shouldn't get excited about spending our local money - that may never happen. Mr. Hubbs informed Council that Mr. Nelson's concern is because he owns property in the right -of -way and the state has allocated funds to acquire parcels in the right -of -way, if development is eminent. There are procedures for getting the state to consider this acquisition. Mr. Nelson asked if this has happened. Mr. Hubbs replied that the state has acquired three parcels already and is presently studying another one. Mayor Mikels told Mr. Nelson that he should contact the City Engineer for any questions he had in contacting the state. Gail Ness, field representative for Senator Bill Richardson replied that she • was told that there is $5 million dollars reserved for freeways and that money was going to the Norco extension to finish the 15 freeway through Norco. if all that money were used for Route 30 it would still end in San Bernardino County because Los Angeles County has dedicated their funds to the Century Freeway. Mayor Mikels commented that Senator Richardson is supporting the Route 30 cause. Federal gas tax goes for interstate projects. Norco Reach is a full interstate project. The interchange for Route 30 and I -15 was placed into the STIP to take advantage of the federal money and also the interchange at State Route 66 and I -15 was placed in the STIP to take advantage of the federal interstate money. The reason it isn't going to Route 30 is because it's not an interstate route. There being no further comments the next item was presented by Mr. Al Holliden which was discussion on participants' concerns and requirements. Mayor Mikels gave a brief summary on Mr, Hollidens credentials and professional background. Mayor Mikels opened up discussion to the public stating that all local input is welcome and that there will be more meetings such as this one as more working papers become available. City Council Minutes April 19, 1983 Page 6 Mr. Schneider replied by providing the schedule that had already begun in February 1983. Mr. Hobbs said that Council will be making key decisions in the next few months, Consultants have prepared these papers as "food for thought" - freeway options, financial options. Mayor Mikels gave summary of what is to happen and what decisions have to be made. Another meeting will have to be scheduled to receive new working papers. Councilman Buquet said that this is just a preliminary study and that they will need more time to study the papers. Mayor Mikels asked if there were anymore comments or questions - there being none, it was moved by Councilman Dahl, seconded by Councilman Buquet to adjourn the meeting to the next City Council meeting on April 20, 1983 at the Lion's Park Community Center in the Forum at 7:30 pm. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 pm. Respectfully submitted, • Judy Acosta Engineering Secretary • Ms. Romero expressed her concern about San Bernardino's comments on not wanting to split the community and sharply dividing it in a socio- economic sense. Another concern she voiced is the environmental imoact on wild life. We have (Rancho Cucamonga) a.quarry area, a creek area (natural state) and would like to see that addressed but not like the way she read it in another document that "they'll go elsewhere ". She would like to see both of those issues addressed without having a negative reaction. Councilman Buquet questioned the cost of a depressed freeway. Mr. Schneider answered that it is more expensive going depressed but if that is what is wanted, why not go for it. The cost is not that much more substantial. In the second phase of the study this will be considered. The costs can differentiate has much as 20% depending upon the areas. Mr. Maloof expressed his concern that City Council should take care of things locally - streets and other things instead of the freeway splitting the city or about it being depressed or elevated. He believes property taxes should be paid for city improvements and not for a freeway. Mayor Mikels asked if there were anymore comments or questions. Mr. Hubbs said he would like the consultant to give a summary of next working papers and would like the consultant to start asking Council to narrow down options and City Council will have to start sorting out options. • Mr. Schneider replied by providing the schedule that had already begun in February 1983. Mr. Hobbs said that Council will be making key decisions in the next few months, Consultants have prepared these papers as "food for thought" - freeway options, financial options. Mayor Mikels gave summary of what is to happen and what decisions have to be made. Another meeting will have to be scheduled to receive new working papers. Councilman Buquet said that this is just a preliminary study and that they will need more time to study the papers. Mayor Mikels asked if there were anymore comments or questions - there being none, it was moved by Councilman Dahl, seconded by Councilman Buquet to adjourn the meeting to the next City Council meeting on April 20, 1983 at the Lion's Park Community Center in the Forum at 7:30 pm. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 pm. Respectfully submitted, • Judy Acosta Engineering Secretary April 20, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, April 20, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: Councilmembers Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet IT, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Jon D. Mikels. Also present: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Jim • Robinson; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve the minutes of February 16, March 2 (as corrected on page 7), and April 11, 1983. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 2. ANNOUNCEMRNTS a. Thursday, April 21, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN HEARING /CITY COUNCIL - Lions Park Community Center. b. Thursday, April 21, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - PARKS COMMITTEE - Lions Park Community Center. C. Thursday, April 21, 1983 - 9:00 a.m. - FL00D CONTROL MEETING - Ontario Chamber of Commerce Office. d. Monday, April 25, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - MELLO -R005 COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT MEETING /CITY COUNCIL - Lions Park Community Center. e. Wednesday, April 270 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. f. Thursday, April 28, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION - Liens Park Community Center. V. Mondny; May 7, 1983 - 7:00 n.m. - COMMUNTTY GOALS /CITY COUNCII, - Lions Park Community Center. 0 h. Tuesday, May 17, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN HEARING /CITY COUNCIL - Lions ?ark Community Center. i. Presentation of Proclamation to Rancho Cucamonga Women's Club Proclaiming April 24, 1983 as Federation Day. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83- 04 -20, and Payroll ending 83 -04 -03 in the amount of $356,054.64. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for off -sale beer 6 wine License for Nor Arco, Inc., 9533 Foothill Boulevard. c. Refer Claim against the City by Ron Vaughn, Alice Vaughn, and Christine Vaughn to the City Attorney for handling. d. Refer Claim against the City by Leonard Eugene Bennett, 8267 London Avenue, Alta Loma, to the City Attorney for handling. • e. Refer Claim against the City by Carl N. Brady to the City Attorney for handling. f. Authorize awarding of contract for street striping and pavement marking services to Pacific Striping of Hacienda Heights, the lowest bidder, at $29,781.00. g. Request approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Contract Change Order No. 6 relating to an existing box culvert on Haven Avenue south of 4th Street as shown on sheet 63 of 75 of the Plans. h. Request approval of Subordination Agreement by Dr. Kornblatt for 10010 Almond Street. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM MELVIN B. KORNBLATT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. i. Approval of Storm Drain Reimbursement Agreement which provides for credits and reimbursement of storm drain fees in conjunction with storm drain improvements on the Pic -N -Save Project, Parcel Map 6658 - Etiwanda • Properties. j. Approval. of Contract Amendment for Design of Storm Restoration Work with L. D. King Engineering for Hellman Avenue /San Bernardino Road to Base Line Road. 0 k. Award of contract for emergency restoration and repairs at various locations. 1. Set Public Hearing for June 15, 1983 for the Vacation of a Portion of 8th Street located between Haven Avenue and the east property line of Parcel Map 7797. (Public utilities and property owners will be notified of public hearing). RESOLUTION NO. 83 -47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE 8TH STREET LOCATED BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL MAP 7797. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. • L. ADVERTIZED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING oNDINANUGN An Ud A o} -uz - 0...wn HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. An amendment to Section 61.0217 of the Zoning Ordinance to include an overlay district containing various development incentives to produce senior citizen oriented multi- family housing, as well as site development and general overlay district location criteria. First considered by Council at the March 2nd meeting. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Discussion followed by Council. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 193• ORDINANCE NO. 193 (second reading) AN ORDINA14CE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0217 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE CREATING A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 193. A typo was noticed in the Ordinance. It should be .7 for the parking ratio. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to adept Ordinance No. 193. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABSENT: None 0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -01 (PARCEL MAP 7827) - CALMARK. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple - family residential /planned development) to R -3 /30 (multiple family residential/senior overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202 - 151 -34. (Related file: GPA 83- 03). Item first considered by Council at the March 2 meeting. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 201. ORDINANCE NO. 201 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 -151- 34, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 7827 AND LOCATED WEST OF ARCHIBALD, NORTH OF BASE LINE FROM R -3 /PD TO 8- 3/50. • Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 201. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 201. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABSENT: None C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 - CALMARK. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from medium -high residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) to high residential (24 -30 dwelling units /acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, and north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34. (Related file: PD 83 -01). Item first considered at the March 2 meeting. Item introduced by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 83-26 and to waive full reading. Motion carried by the following vote: • AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABSENT: None City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -26. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T4E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE A1ENDMENT 83 -01. An amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.08.160 and 1.08.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding home occupation permits. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 199. ORDINANCE NO. 199 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 1.08.160 AND 1.08.170 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNCIPAL CODE REGARDING HOME OCCUPATION • PERMITS. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 199. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 199. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABSENT: None E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -02 (TENTATIVE TRACT 12362) RANCHO CENTER. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family residential) to R -3 /PD (multiple family residential /planned development) and the development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman - APN 208- 011 -02, and 04. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Mr. Lovegren expressed this was something which was needed in Rancho Cucamonga. lie asked if these were rentals or ownership. Mr. Gomez responded they could be purchased by an individual owner and then rented out, or he could buy the whole four -plex and live in one unit and rent the other three. Mr. Lovegren stated we needed more rental units in the City. There b ^, e no further ._ r ..__, Mayor Mil-iS nln,pd the public hearing Mr. Frost felt this was a dramatic deviation from previous hillside grading standards. He asked what type of discussion had taken place at the Planning Commission and why was it that this particular site was deemed not appropriate to those standards. Mr. Gomez stated the Planning Commission and the Grading Committee looked at this proposal. Because of the unique characteristics of the drainage of the site and of the hillside condition, it was necessary to propose a larger scale grading concept in order for the facilities to handle the onsite drainage and to provide flow into the street system which would then be carried to a storm drain system, it was necessary to reduce the elevations on the hill a lot more than would have otherwise been necessary in a more involved hillside area. It was because of the unique hydrological on that hillside in order to accommodate for the purpose of drains. Mayor Mikels inquired as to what was the ultimate vehioluar access to Base Line or to Hellman. Mr. Gomez responded that the ingress and egress will be along an easement on the parcel up front which will be combined with future development which is about 200 -300 feet west of Hellman. • City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 202. ORDINANCE NO. 202 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, BEZ04ING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 208- 011 -02 AND 04, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 6395 LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE, ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE FROM R -3 TO R -3/PD FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12362. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 202. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels set second reading for May 4, 1983• 5. ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION None submitted for consideration. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS • A. CONSIDERATION OF TECHNICIAN POSITION_ Staff report by Jack Lam, Community Development Director. Motion; Moved by 2nhi_s2er .,nen h„ nehl to itlato the rer rnitino procedure for the Engineering Technician position; the position to be re- evaluated at budget. time. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 0 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS None submitted for consideration. 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION REGARDING MEDIAN ISLANDS FOR THE CITY. Item was originally requested by Councilman Dahl at the March 16 city council meeting. Council requested that staff compile all city policies relating to median islands and bring back to council for further discussion. Mr. Dahl stated this was a request he brought to Council. He stated the following location should be studied as far as median requirements: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to send back to the Planning Commission for study. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. ADDED REPORTS BY COUNCIL: An oral report was presented by Mr. Frost from the Revenue and Taxation Subcommittee of the League of California Cities. An oral report was presented by Mayor Mikels from the Fee Subcommittee which met on Thursday, April 18, with himself, Councilman Frost, Chamber of Commerce, private sector, BIA, and Board of Realtors. 9. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn to an Executive Session, not to reconvene this evening. Meeting to reconvene on Thursday, April 21, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lions Park Community Center for Public Hearing on the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk 1. Base Line between west city limits and Haven Avenue. 2. Archibald from south city limits north to Base Line. • 3• Industrial Arrow). area, east of Haven, south of Arrow to 6th (including Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to send back to the Planning Commission for study. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. ADDED REPORTS BY COUNCIL: An oral report was presented by Mr. Frost from the Revenue and Taxation Subcommittee of the League of California Cities. An oral report was presented by Mayor Mikels from the Fee Subcommittee which met on Thursday, April 18, with himself, Councilman Frost, Chamber of Commerce, private sector, BIA, and Board of Realtors. 9. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn to an Executive Session, not to reconvene this evening. Meeting to reconvene on Thursday, April 21, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lions Park Community Center for Public Hearing on the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk T w %o R961 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.NGA J WARR I VIN I V E N 0 O R N A R E 18265 VCIO FORMS ALICNNFNT R 18266 VOID FORMS ALTCNM�VT 18 ?67 VCIU FORMS ALIGNMFNT I8269 VFIJ FCPMS ALIGNMENT 13'69 2 ^0I A A FCNIPMFNT RENTALS IR270 0265 AITA RNCHG CIASS 6 MIRR w U 7 n 0 r r FRICA NT 6 SA FRING TECT. HARRY TIES SIGN SER COMMERCE GIST ERS OF SO APEt VINCE HrNF CO PLA1.T FC @0 SSOC 04AL OR A N ERIC 0 WARRANT RECONCILIATION 6/01/03 0 F RJFvRENLE L115COUNT NET 2.410.12 286.96 136.00 941.50 1 T4.92 300.00 1.000.00 • PAGE 1 s- O R167 CITY Or RAT-CF;' CUCAHONGA WAPRANT RFJCJOIN,,CIL``IATLCN 5130163 WARP 6 RA67 [I& RANCHO CUGNON9A .ARRANT REJCOpN TIOM 6101/63 NARR R YEN A V E N 0 C R N A M E OARR ( DISCOUNT MET In69D p390 SAN. prRNAPOINO CD -/09/P3 REFERENCE 5.00 8339 8340 9460 9491 WHITNEY. MARY WfLCOLR FATTERY CC 6 /0I /83 6/01163 45.00 40.17 18341 9501 MI LLIAMSCN C SCHMID 6/01183 33 953.63 18342 9600 XEROX CORPORATION 6/01/63 1i16b.13 18343 VOID FINAL TOTALS 6 /01/83 1.642.74 r. 2C20 CALIF DPIITAL SERVICE 5 /O9 /01 FINAL TOTALS 417.663.31 r 71105 PUB FMFL RFTIPEMrNT SYS 1 /Da /93 6.453.69 19857 3P6 NFSTFPN IRRIGATION V09/91 631.P0 s- O R167 CITY Or RAT-CF;' CUCAHONGA WAPRANT RFJCJOIN,,CIL``IATLCN 5130163 WARP 6 VtN R V F N O C 0. N A M E j)ATF DISCOUNT Nil RFFFRENCE In69D p390 SAN. prRNAPOINO CD -/09/P3 5.00 117651 11120 INgRAN PAPER r /09/0.3 11527.P7 10652 C125 ACIIrN TRAVEL AGENCY 5 /0S /P3 134.00 111653 7314 M.IINFI SHARON /D9A£3 19654 9250 WILLS FAPCP TRUSTEE 5 /DS /P1 1.642.74 ICA95 2C20 CALIF DPIITAL SERVICE 5 /O9 /01 1.573.64 ID656 71105 PUB FMFL RFTIPEMrNT SYS 1 /Da /93 6.453.69 19857 3P6 NFSTFPN IRRIGATION V09/91 631.P0 IOGSA 1A" PACIFIC PFOC`UCTS 51 OS /C3 269.17 T /09/01 3PS.OS LD (. LC 7159 FYB tCI510N FYDR6ULIC SYS 5/05/93 45.02 19661 E6U' INFAP. CrN.IP 5 /Ir /P3 265.45 19667 7529 firm". IIf. 5/12/03 1165175 19AA_ (1030 A G 4 APPLIANCES 5f12 /9i 64.A1 19664 4120. DFPFNGFN1 AA E/ V/93 10665 41217 FnPTY1LL IA_NIIFNT AA 5/12JP3 19(6" 1700 DANK OF AMFPICA S /I° /P3 9.314.11 1 ^667 4E5D GLFIIFALP (rUFRAL SAVING 5 /1c /B) 2.784.CC LM1AR 0410 SAN 1111"{7 O FNP F.B 1, 5/19/113 4.721.50 I PLA^ 7311 II Nr SD'3RON °ST FN'13 cfilt`l 10670 19621 S'�O a ',?. W UNITE, NAY SAN P9Nr CL PRCDATIUN 5/19/93 '119 /RA 86.90 51.00 1`672 4 , PAICI'9 CUCA °GNG4 FvPICY ' /IS /n] 3100 10673 FP2➢ CITY 176 P4NCH^ r11CAMCNG 5119/01 •,�,0 I ^.674 0 Ht ST VAILFY YARSH%k[ - /ISIR3 125.72 i,,'71 7147 PP11RTC!'31Y 03 512(1113 175.00 1`1(71. ]45 I'1T1 "<<PII DIiFFS Or PO J ?r /P3 199.90 19671 ?Is RICK UC TUC-AS S /2r /171 469.00 17974 ' 2I5 If ITL CI TY BN IF ASSOC 117C183 115.00- 90005 VrIC AI IrNVr NT 5(117/1,3 SOD9, VDhI TFR9S FI`P< AtIEN4FN1 E /3C1P1 9] ^T Y�`10 Fm:VS At ICNHt NT c /1, /91 "5171 t ^In Inn ^S AU FN 4NT °J3r/93 1,905 5/'0./91 eons w,ln 17x171 rr7els 5/30./93 FINAL TOTALS 77.926.22 1 , 9, PAGE 1 nTrm it T A ATO"n ITT TO A XffnXTP A STAFF REPORT; 4I June 1, 1983 y, a F � i _ s TO; City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Status Proposed County Solid Waste Refuse Rate Adjustment As you are aware, the County Board of Supervisors have scheduled a public hearing June 13, to consider establishing an " enterprize" system to support County solid waste landfill sites. Additionally, as indicated by the County's solid waste consultant, this change in operating status would reflect an increase of the basic disposal fee charge to $8.60 per ton, from $3.50 per ton. The Board of Supervisors referred this matter to County Solid Waste Advisory Council for study and a recommendation prior to their June 13 meeting. A special meeting of the Solid Waste Advisory Council was held on May 27, that allowed for public, government, and industry input. At the meeting there seemed to be no opposition to the establishment of an ^enterprise" system, however, concern arose with how this would be approached. There were many questions with the information and implementation plan provided by the County's consultant. Listed below are a few of the basic problems with the plan. • No revenues were considered - (i.e., sale of landfill site for future use, sale of methane gas, and funds derived by use of site for parks). • Portion of fees collected ($850,000) are to be an amortized payment to reimburse the county general fund for past subsidies. The consensus of the Solid Waste Advisory Council was they favored an "enterprise" system, however, a great deal more study was needed before this type of program was undertaken. They will be recommending to the Board of Supervisors to delay any rate adjustment action until October 1, to allow sufficient time to identify the costs related to operation of solid waste landfill sites. RAR:mk June 1, 1983 Cal McElwain, Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Bernardino 175 West Fifth Street San Bernardino, CA 92415 Dear Supervisor McElwain: HE: True Valley Waste Disposal Cost It has come to our attention the Board of Supervisors at its June 13 meeting will be considering the establishment of an "enterprize" system, which would allow the County's solid waste landfill sites to be financially self - supporting. The City of Rancho Cucamonga supports the basic notion that solid waste fees should cover the total cost involved in the operation and maintenance of landfill sites. However, in the present case of the County's proposed "enterprize" system (as outlined in "True Valley Waste Disposal Cost "), we believe there exists some major questions unanswered which would negate any validity in a financing method of this sort. Our two main points of contention with the County's proposal are: (a) No revenues were considered for projected sale of landfill sites, future fees for use of landfill site once closed (i.e., parks, leases, rentals), or the sale of methane gas while site is in use; (b) Portion of fees collected are to be an amortized payment to reimburse the County general fund for past subsidies. These issues as presented in the proposal need to be studied and appropriate adjustments considered. Supervisor McElwain, the City of Rancho Cucamonga urges you delay any action on this matter until sufficient time has been alloted to properly identify all the costs, revenues, and policy decisions related to the operation of an "enterprize" system for landfill sites. A major philosophy change of this type will have a financial impact on every resident and business in the valley area and should merit careful consideration. Sincerely, Jon D. Mikels JDM:RAR:mk v y MEMORANDUM v° May 25, 1983, —J i TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserma City Manager SUBJECT: Christmas House On Tuesday of this week I talked with Janet Toews, one of the proposed developers of the Christmas House if it is converted to a Bed and Breakfast House as proposed to the Council at the May 18 Council meeting. Janet seemed to be encouraged by the Council's receptivity to the proposal. I did indi- cate that it was difficult for the Council to make any kind of commitments without having first reviewed more detailed plans. She understood that and has requested that the plans be included on the agenda of June 1. The date of sale for the Christmas House is June 2nd. She does not wish to proceed with her bid until she has some indication from the city council that the proposal she has submitted is somewhat acceptable. This item will he scheduled for the June 1 City Council meeting so that Council will have an opportunity to review the matter prior to the sale of the House the next day. LMW: baa MEMORANDUM June 1, 1983 -5 F -1977 TO: City Council n FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Budget Update As we promised you, we have had an opportunity to review the Sheriff's contract which has been changed and is provided to you in a new format with this year's budget. Fortunately for the City, the new format resulted in a savings to us so that the actual amount of anticipated increase was not realized. We, therefore, found funds available to handle some of the items which were omitted from the earlier budget documents. Those items which are now included in the budget include a contingency fund for modest salary adjustments so that we will be able to.keep pace with salaries offered by other public and private agencies, . Ywelve thousand dollars for the Chamber of Commerce which is about the same level that is being spent this year for the organization, and the restora- tion of small amounts of overtime which were previously totally eliminated from the budget because of monetary problems. In addition, we have restored some funds for emergency equipment such as generators and rain gear and other essential items which are needed because of the storms we experience in Rancho Cucamonga. In summary, the budget you will be receiving is by no means adequate to deal with all of our community needs, but it is balanced rather in a deficit position. In addition to the budget, you will be receiving under separate cover a list from each department of programs which relate to the goals we have dis- cussed, but are not presently included in the budget. These programs will be stated in general terms so as not to place the City Council in a difficult position either at budget time or during the next municinal election. Also, provided under separate cover will be a list of the major revenue sources which, if the Council wishes, could hr. explored as a means for increasing the City's financial base. While some may be totally unacceptable to the Council, we feel at least an obligation to point out the options to you. We intend to have the budget sent out this Friday, The backup material will be provided we hope by Monday. In summary, the General Fund budget is $8,680,387.00. The budget includes no personnel cuts, the addition of two deputies and one unit in the law City Council Re: Budget Update June 1, 1983 Page 2 enforcement contract, and adequate funds for modest salary adjustments for our existing employees. LNW:baa cc: Department Heads UFfY UP' KANCIiO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: Members of the City Counci and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior P ann SUBJECT: CHRISTMAS HOUSE PROPOSA c� MAN 41 �' r Q 19:7 Since Janice Toews and Jay Ilsley have approached the Council with the idea of converting the Christmas House to a bed - and - breakfast inn, questions have arisen with regard to the mechanism by which that use could be approved. Some ideas were raised with regard to zone changes or variances for the property since it is zoned and planned for single family residential uses. We have prepared this memo in order to provide some ideas and direction with regard to the preservation of landmarks and focal points as described within the City's General Plan. Under the Design Element of the General Plan, a section entitled "Landmarks and Focal Points" is provided which identifies several significant landmarks within the City. The Christmas House on Archibald Avenue is listed as one of these points of interest. The objective listed in the General Plan basically encourages the preservation and enhancement of special heritage features as landmarks and focal points. The policy section states that incentives should be provided to oncnuraae adaot.ive reuse _ lacen uses on sites on p�'ovfdE�ti'oun a ion o a w amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow uses other than a residential use for a historic landmark. Staff has drafted a section within the draft Development Code which contains provisions for the development of historical structures and landmarks for uses other than residential uses. This would include low intensity uses such as boarding houses, bed - and - breakfast inns, small offices, specialty restaurants such as gourmet restaurants or possibly a boutique. It is intended that similar intensity uses would be listed as potential uses for a historical landmark and would be regulated by the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Additionally, this could include review and recommendations from the Historical Commission. Christmas House Proposal June 1, 1983 Page 2 The Conditional Use process for a use of this nature in a residential zone is more desirable than a change of zone or variance. This is based on the fact that a Conditional Use Permit would give the City greater ability to regulate and control the use and if needed, deny a use that was deemed incompatible with the surrounding uses. The use which these people are proposing is similar to the intent in the draft Development Code. If the Council feels that this is a reasonable route, we would recommend deferring this item until the adoption of the draft Development Code within the next few months. Should the Council wish to amend the Ordinance to allow the processing of a Conditional Use prior to the adoption of the draft Development Code, staff would request direction from the Council to initiate an amendment to the current Interim Zoning Ordinance based upon the current General Plan policies regarding landmarks and focal points. RG:MV:jr 1550 W. 8th Street, Apt. 28 Upland, California 91786 May 26, 1983 :ITY OF RANCHO CO0AP4oMGA P2U`IITY V[I r D'c P'. Mr. Rick Gomez MAY :' u lcOp Community Development Department AM PM City of Rancho Cucamonga 7181gIl01111121112A4i516 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Z P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Gomez: In response to our request for a zoning variance for the Christmas House at 9240 Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, Mr. Lauren Wasserman suggested that we contact you with a more detailed proposal outlining our plans. We have enclosed a copy of our original request, which pro- vides a very general overview of our intentions. Before providing more specific details, we'd first like to reiterate our enthusiasm for our project and our love of the house, which were our primary motivators in formulating our ideas. We'd like to take this opportunity to explain in greater detail our plans and to address what we believe might be the concerns of the City Council members - -and hopefully to alleviate these concerns. In our original letter we very briefly stated that we intend to use the Christmas House as a private residence. We'd like to emphasize that this will be our primary residence. While it is true that what we are proposing is a business venture, it will in fact be a very small one, with our primary intentions more of wanting to open and share the house with other people rather than to make money from it. We provided in our letter a general description of the concept of Bed -and- Breakfast Inns. While many Bed- and - Breakfasts have developed into large multi -room inns representing hotels more than B- and -Bs, many have retained the original concept of people opening a few extra bedrooms in their home for travelers, which describes more accurately our intentions. The Christmas House has five bedrooms on the second floor; however, we are considering using the two bedrooms on the south as one adjoining suite, and having the option of using the two northwest bedrooms as a suite or single rooms. This would result in a maximum of only 3 -4 parties of guests at any one time. We want to create an atmosphere of warm hospitality, with personal attention to guests and to details such as fresh fruits and flowers in every room, thick terrycloth towels, homebaked goods in abundance, and bicycles and lawn croquet available for guests spending the day. Food service available will be very light, consisting of continental breakfasts served in a common dining area or outside in the garden, or if guests prefer, in their bedroom. Our primary aim, as we stated in our letter, is to make Mr. Rick Gomez Page 2 May 25, 1933 the Christmas House a gracious, hospitable home in which travelers are made to feel comfortable and welcome. In addition to accommodating travelers, another viable use of the Christmas House that we envision is accommodating friends and family visiting residents of Rancho Cucamonga, who need extra bedroom space for their guests. Many people are faced with this situation, yet are hesitant in suggesting a hotel. The Christmas House would provide a unique, practical alternative to this situation and would provide a home -like atmosphere. In this way we could be a convenient and valuable asset to the neighborhood. We also proposed opening the house for weddings and various types of recep- tions. The type of weddings we have in mind are very small garden weddings for approximately 20 -30 people, on weekends only and ending by early evening. We would not allow loud music but rather have in mind classical music such as string quartets, recorder ensembles, classical guitar, or flute /harpsichord ensembles, in keeping with the style of the house. Use of alcohol at receptions would be limited to champagne or wine. We value the historical significance of the house and want to give it the dignity and status that it deserves as a landmark. We believe the house is in sound condition but plan extensive work in restoration, including retaining and refurbishing the polished wooden floors, and furnishing the house with period antiques, remodeling in its original Victorian style as much as possible, with close attention to comfort. We also plan extensive landscaping, with secluded garden areas in the back and north side of the house. We are strictly opposed to removing any of the existing trees or shrubbery but will incorporate them in our plans. We plan minimal landscaping in the front of the house - -we want to retain an openness in the front that will draw the attention to the house itself. We feel the palms adequately provide a very simple elegant framing of the house. We are considering using the adjacent lot to the south of the house for our parking needs. It should provide more than adequate space for the minimal parking area that our plans will require. We also value the importance of traditions, and as we stated in our original letter, want to keep the historical tradition associated with the Christmas House in the past by opening up the house every year for Christmas festivities. We want the Christmas feeling of goodwill to be associated with the house throughout the year. We understand very well your concerns for mixing commercial and residential zoning and the potential problems this can create in the neighborhood. We would like to stress that we want to be a good neighbor, and that we believe our plans will not pose any problems, but rather enhance the neighborhood. We also want to emphasize that the Christmas House is somewhat isolated from Mr. Rick Gomez Page 3 May 26, 1983 the neighborhood, in that the house is the only one facing Archibald Avenue. We feel the minimal commercial activities of our plans will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding neighborhood. We hope this proposal fully explains our plans and answers any questions that may have arisen from our original request. Given that we are successful in our bid, we hope to have full support of the Community Development Department and the City Council. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ' Janice Toews Jay llsley cc: L. M. Wasserman 1550 W. 8th Street, Apt. 28 Upland, CA 91786 May 13, 1983 Mr. Loren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr, Wasserman: Wo are interested in purchasing the "Christmas House" at 9240 Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. We understand hoaever that the intended plans v;a have for the house are not permissible under the current zoning and that it is not possible to get a variance. Mr. Rick Narks of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Zoning Department suggested that vie contact you and request that a conditional use process be gran Lee, so we may be allowed to carry out our plans with permission from the city. Mr. Marks informed us that the zoning for this property is R -1, for resi- dential use only. We intend to use the Christmas House as a private residence, but in addition we would like to open the house to the public as a Bed and Breakfast Inn. If you are unfamiliar with the concept of Bed and Breakfast Inns, we have enclosed a brief description taken from the 1963 -84 edition of Country Inns--Lod and Ili storic Hotels of California and the Northwest, by Hitchcock and Lindgren, Fi -Cr.� provides a description of the type of ambiance we want to create. The (:oncept of Bed and Breakfasts originated in England and is relatively new to California, but interest in them is growing rapidly as people are becoming aware of the pleasant and 0 3rmina alternative to hotels that Bed and Breakfasts provide. We are very enthusiastic about introducing the concept to Rancho Cucamonga, and we believe ours will be the first in Pomona Valley. We want the Christmas House to be a gracious, hospitable home in which travelers are made to feel comforta- ble and welcome so their visit to or through Rancho Cucamonga will be memorable. In addition to making the Christmas House a Bed and Breakfast Inn, we would like to offer the house to the public.. as a location for small garden weddings and various types of receptions. The elegant grounds and charm that we plan will provide an ideal setting for special occasions such as these. le would like to emphasize that our primary intent in restoring the Christmas House is to recreate the original design and "Flavor" as much as possible. We value the historical significance that the hail;(, has contributed in the past, end would like for it to become a well - known landmark of which the city can be proud. In keeping with historical traditions, we would life to carry on the feeling of goodwill associated with the hour.(, in years past by opening the house every year for Christmas festivities for citizens of Rancho Cucamonga and the surroundin areds. The Christmas House is being offered in court - approved auction on June 2, 1983, and we need to know -- within the next week if possible - -how the city feels about our plans so that are may know whether or not to proceed with purchasing arrangements. We would like to meet with you at your earliest convenience to discuss in further detail the plans that we have and to answer any questions that you might have. We are very excited about our plans and believe that the Christmas House, as we envision it, will be a charming enhancement to the neighborhood and the city. We will contact you to arrange a meeting and look forward to hearing your suggestions and opinion regarding the procedures necessary for obtaining appropriate approvals for our plans. Sincerely, Janice Toews 'Jay 11sley Enclosure Introduction 1:11 Will rat AnS, U,. "Ill IIW III' .y'mag Inon" lddl ... cd Ivy the 1; o,uvcs arc. b Collie I hto u stc h e w hn :o o tuvuoluaW in ssh, to e tihle vdo c+aesrtl: s , I n he 1c+. and to the fpregs. The Hoge of Scographic and dinlat is cordiliom is ns curcmcin Otis regiona n y,-Il re on t6c planet. so is the lance of .omnry inim The west ward expansion is a rclnt ively recent Pllcnnmc- can, and 1. ;i,n,mals nliviausly shauid nob cs PCCI III find 2W-ycnl -old New 111111 :md fanuhnuscs, \Vhal can be found, however, is ml,aplo- sanl of Vlctolmo architedur,, along with dorm, of hotels Ihm hark Nock In III't. dJ and woolly W cet. The preinise of gold and sileer find r..r.inu, :uW I :ICCJ of Will of Ihnu+ :unit 11 pro,pccto;s auJ I:uncu, 11110 left behind Jvrns of ghost Irv,vus after the cnhaustion of the nom uch mi, I tb' pare, II111 follow, the trader will diunva a, 16c, a lgull: edecdioo of uuu, lodges, anti hotel,. We Nava a,tvnWCll C sdecllull Ih.a should Ill for plenty of nllcrnadivcs to the motel - ,ham syndromc tll:n arc suitable Porn wi, enudicncC of readers, who will find in these lmge% n:,lic Indgn, old mining tamps, historic pill hmcls, and luxuri. tic, bun inlcrc,lingty ccecnnm R.mr15. NVc ha,, put pnscly a,oid'd a Lr n;e tpacnl, ill the belief Ihal what might rate high for us might 1101 ,;ppcJ nm, of our readers. Nor do we ,i,l•l la Impose our lade. 55'e h.ne rcnlel k,d in ollter b0ok.s 11,111 sons pLmes Ihat von om "fed :n nlm a ml;,, before t1,, filcplaed' Pcrsonalilie, naghl nob scit rc;sJcn „IIn require more sm icce and physical contforls Ihan ,,'c do. Once toll hate chosen art inn, we suggcsi that you write early' lot I 1,,u itai s Jocri Plivc Iin,ralure. head the brochures look at the Pic- tnI", dl"k Illc nlap.:ultl ddcnnhte wh¢Ilwi, the inn will acluadly ntdel vac. aced, Inns arc "Cl like mo :c!s. Each Ills it spccia: 11:11 Cc: nlf.u: :0 one bill It'll ntios.Gi :)':0, d : :uL :i :.Do ;:OI .. ,i l.;II ll I C. I11 a. 1 11 it k ee!un emI ; :l,eIII ) :cr :eq;.i: ComIlrt. We II.wc quoI'd the :I"" uc,m Isom :.!IC, to it e .N Ia c d"al .md Inde, al the end of the ho:b.. !iel,in, 9:otdJ urac G:.:::6, „ I", :. ::, ::I \' ,Itlar,•:I Ill Wild, lib, ,hn:idI. ......... :p in vna,1 ell,: +ill..' 1.,up.. ...tl,ly elu .:d ... ,a. .W, Iv, .. ..,e.. .. ..+ h, rd ua ..e Awcl,ean I'Lll: (A I',;Ill l la 11 ulo:hlI.., l.ub,'J1, N:I ..... ..I. n v, n..w flan (:tIA I', b,'.vki.v.1 .: ,.. .a .nn em L.,im 1. ❑r,: .:,:.. III'uk Lv,: lull. Iu11 of C'nnl :ca r :A :;.d .al.u, mm�h).W1:rany!elLS added. L'' elo l+A. Ch :;,L-cl :avid le, p:c,c : :: spcev.J l,' ta. ...+.:t. nl.,l:c r.: a,, 11 c1, he; i, rrnl tmlem::c a: en uln It I, "'ICL: ...... ::m1. I Fnsc:cgWai:um 0:sc Uric:: ra:u:g4 oral I: ,, .,::,,a: ,..:.0 a:a: m :Gcs travcl:nL „'i:1, 601" isquirc Ia asis :m.c. ILv':: C'.r...g:: min)' mrs stone tl:cy are open all year, syc f ;d that m.n:) c:mc d a: vcg s!ow periods. Cau first to confirm you: room :arn aties. We ,ugfC,1 that bel'o:C traecling to any Joie )pa p,:r!num of Iva „c'I a::J loudtm. A,k for Il:c t :.le lo.:d ;: :J .. padcl ul general Navel infonn;aon. If)'o;a!:.l,c tpecii:7o .�. ,,I, I, nc :d +, the deP.l.;nIcal Can oftan xnd c:, o: hat :,.In:hcpar's lh,l &Illoo', r,ndos oil;: i•.msc : : :.. : :... ... c ,. o�ll.0 :dca h; ",d c. \ \'s I..n of 11 ;e lotrn, slid ea {age,. For ihntr ,c -i ::,. . : : :.::. :..... .v, tleI C IS t n :ndcx .tt ll,c and of lbc booA, ..I! Ii 12 O tl.ea I in for:u.11 iml. I I e um, in Till, bunk we rc choscp to Blair I11 c; Z 1 G:.,..::, 1 : ". e'! pan billy on Ihei' 11..1,1 ecl nill style, location, f I ; ;:LA ::::f,.....,..1..: If \ \'C mod no Slrlcl dC:I I!: I PC It of alt'-n n.' Allhoug :t II:C Ira: T. .lentil ct a place w h I: boll, Indginli and'nod. +, C have 1111 I x. eat :ha: p; uv:J, IIo Ill Gals. We did not i::clu Jc okf lolls Clot only scn'C Mu I. :!:houfa: a grcai n:.up exist in the rc: on. The informah:+n : ;: c c.:n:e G 0:n scl,cr :;l sc;lrccs: ma personal :tl:owirdgc of the m:s, .:al uul, "r ao deem rclic'oic. and per.o : :.:l sl :nO -t o :. : : :v Ala': i:.uc 1 ;mdc c,cay cl Ion to prov:,e tnfnrm,; if:: as c.:.c: all) ... J aco:msly as passlhlc, but xC rcmind rc wILIcrs 111a, ill..c:as itra Ixdule, Ililerl are suJject to change. Fl.lally, INC have: :cal :r. sJLc. act, no: accepted any fees or gratuities for inclusion in tb:s b, 0k or f l it f V� alp of the mhos OooAs iu 111C Colnplrli Traveler series. It i, iagvn lnut m us Ihnl thin book continue lu gl ow in usefnluca in vlccccdinp, edit ium. \\'c rcrY 1u °ell wish to h<ar of viat"'perien<es ;n t1w Illl,\ !bled in JOS whilllt' Inal 111 RCeive yout ]Illaleal iollt For .lJJdl,ns It dcictiuu \fn] fuinlc vulloucs, WC will I' Ac bcly clfn't 1a .till" I 111 101111 pcl.uunlly. I'Ir, sC wrile In ns in cane or \'.n A, h de, l.. 14u1I " AIn'Al'u., 2.151 roll 19nly .w f.... 1111vrel, NY umn. I l.u'c.11'.ond ll ill. Anuu)N)-Ilururarr. JI.AN LINIn.ION aJ 111 lmn rune California Anmdor Ci0" California n11NI. IMUM, INN ICOU:c •19, Nuadol C11y, Cl lOnni:1. Atadmr. od J:l— PA). I,a. 2.15. Anladol City. CA 'I5G01. 2119- 2A`7- 5-)O0- PeLl! and Ann ili.0 m D.u,hcn.pccA 111. UPCO "11 ""' In Il:c h;1:1 0l :Itc \Bile' Lodc, AnlaJ l- Cuv..w 11W J.., ; o% ';I w , . I:,l: ,ll"'.1"la ISP)..11lunq'a 11:a ,c.,l ,l ;d nl'c '1'nmd qu;uv —canm lie ucst Seal. -Ii :cop.: .... Ju1c \l Yllnll :l :l n :l :l+.n:Y. Itl :l :i,l.11i :l(: r,,n:1 1 : : :"Ilti� ++c. \. `l'• �r,,........ of Ile Ln lac +i , :old.qu :u It elana. ill [lie !:,:c. : :hnln S2J.50GA1.II)-n3rlh had ben, u4n fro., 1!:c .: AP.cu: Is,omy- riveycars ago, Pcicr Dacbcspecl dlsccs'crcv' 11z o:d n :n;;:c- mmpany office and began the painsialking co.;versio:. of :he early building into an inn. 'I uday gulls slay in rooms li for :itch f::nccn :, in 601J R.n:: days. The \fill Grnding Rooms ceiling sti!1 bean Sapporo fCt . w xhaf;ing llwl d :o +'c the machircp'uscd to fvh cdic sa : -.;.:c o:c.`cfo:c usa)'ing. in the Rotors Room, gold was smchlil 11113 bcf:ion and ccr- ricd by dumb, a -ziler to the vault. Other rooms carry si n:tar mcniors of the days of rich,& and excitemenl: One may choose train the Sac. cs Roo:a. A.eay Roont, Dircclor's Roo:n, llnolkccping !tree. and Reps :nrc J\c v �incAls are Ircatcd to coffee. Ica., lcl Ow"C'lc :c. nnJ m and :c lui¢ iu Iheir roons a l the six: t of each mor+ing. Nn moat+ :uc «n'cJ at 16c inn, but f- 1:csls arc Ji: cc;cJ to tort! rcsm :rar.: a. iL..n..... ufiwu: fl mm'.:s „ill p:nale bell. Pell: No! pc:n: icJ. Driving lnstruclic The inn is on R3UIC 49 al Ilc scold c,!zc of town. rAt :l u:P: t,: 5• II[ �r.ov1? SOCIE IV OF THE Commu-,rry, INC. A \ON PROiIi ORGAN I2 >TION. INCORpORATEI> J'JNE 1956 F._ O. BOX s02 ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA tl1161 Consolidated Monthly Report to City of B,n ti•n ., oamnnoa 1ionth Ending ApT.I tosi THIS THIS YEAR ' THIS MORTH LOST YEAR I'4ONTH� TC DATE I LAST YEAR TO DATE No. Licenses Issued 191 9.403 _ No. Dogs Impounded 145 I 1.416 I�I No. Dcas Returned Haao 12 _ 213 _ —i_ _ Ivo. cogs t{co;acu 't I o. Dog Sites Reported N F1as a I Other Animal Sites Reported; Domostic 10 tld 2 _ No. of Bites Investigated L1 145 Total Number of visits Made I No. Heads Sent to Laboratory 1 4 No. Cases of Rabies No. of Citations Issued_ to 177 Number brought to Court 10 177 _I No. of Convictions Obtained No. of Injured Animal Pickups 1 1 114 I No. of Dead Animal Pickups 39 461—T —I No. of Day Calls L L 237 2.579 _ No_. of :Ifght Calls j— 5 113 No, of f Miles Patrolled Miles citi s 7 601 70.'041 I of Cats Adoptrd e 702 No. of Cats Put to Slcc p_. I�, 2 — 11�644 I � - - -1 LlCCI1:iC YC @5 l.i V11CC�8V J, OJY.Ju 131 V41.6D 1982 License Fees 1,793.50 n r.n ennnwtCe _.,rs r,.. vIMEMORANDUM DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: E.S.P. REVIEW/ 14EW ITEMS Fire District Comments: V� y�� 9 4i 3 n, C z � U 2 a On 5.26, the Foothill Fire Protection District submitted a request to include additional text in the Plan (See attached Exhibit "A "). The requested additions do not represent a substantive change, nor are they inconsistent with any policies or standards contained in the Plan. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Text be modified in accordance with Exhibit "B ", incorporating the District's comments verbatim. Interim Agricultural Uses: 197 It has been brought to our attention that the Plan Text does not expressly address interim agricultural uses; our intent was to refer issues such as this to the City -Wide Zoning Ordinance/ Development Code. However, since questions regarding the interim agricultural use of land in Etiwanda are likely to be asked often, it may be appropriate to include these City -Wide Interim Agricultural Use Provisions in the Etiwanda Plan as well. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Text be modified in accordance with Exhibit "C ". Res ec ul submitted, Rick ome RG /OK /kap attachments � h W E Do CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT, FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT MAy201983 AM PM 7181900111211121314 A I3 The Etiwanda area and the entire area north of the (Jity limits are susceptible to fires because of fire -prone vegetation, poor access by fire fighting equipment, lack of water service and inadequate water pressure at fire prone elevations, and atmospheric conditions that exacer- bate fire hazard conditions. The Foothill Fire Protection District provides fire pro- tection and orevention services to the Etiwanda planning area. The district operates three fire stations within the City limits with the nearest station to the planning area being located at Base Line and Rochester Avenue. In addition to fire protection and prevention, the Foothill Fire District is also responsible for evaluating projects through the City's Development Review and Growth Manage- ment process. Areas of concern include Site Plan design, fire access, building materials, water availability, fire response times, and other factors which influence fire safety. All proposed development shall satisfy the structural fire protection standards contained in the most recent editions of the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. Further, all standards, ordinances and regulations governing site development and building construction as set forth by the Foothill Fire Protection District shall apply. Said standards, ordinances and regulations may be amended from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Fire Chief. / /Jim W. bowman I� M . battalion Chief Fire Marshal�r 5.5 OTHER AGENCIES 5.51 GENERAL Besides the City of Rancho Cucamonga, there are a number of public and quasi -public agencies and organizations which in some way control or affect the development review process. It is not the intent of this section to specify all the regulations and standards used by these agencies; ongoing changes in their regulations would require constant updating and amending of the Specific Plan. Rather, it is the intent to note who those agencies are and how they may affect specific development proposals. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to contact these agencies early in the process to obtain the most up -to -date information. 5.52 FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT The Etiwanda area and the entire area north of the City limits are susceptible to fires because of fire-prone vegetation, poor access by fire fighting equipment, lack of water service and inadequate water pressure at fire prone elevations, and atmospheric conditions that exacerbate fire hazard conditions. The Foothill Fire Protection District provides fire protection and prevention services to the E stations planning area. The district operates three fire stations s within the City limits with the nearest station to the planning area being located at Base Line and Rochester Avenue. In addition to fire protection and prevention, the Foothill Fire District is also responsible for evaluating projects through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. Areas of concern include Site Plan design, fire access, building materials, water availability, fire response times, and other factors which influence fire safety. All proposed development shall satisfy the structural fire protection standards contained in the most recent editions of the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. Further, all Aandards, ordinances and regulations governing site development and building construction as set forth by the Foothill Fire Protection District shall 5-47 �• / � M rjj N apply. Said standards, ordinances and regulations may be amended from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Fire Chief. 5.53 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT The Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) provides all water supply services to the planning area, and in addition collects domestic sewage which is eventually treated by the Chino Basin Municipal Water District. The CCWD is ultimately responsbile for water and sewer lines within the planning area. Project design and planning may be affected by specific line locations and capacities. 5 -48 .203 Agricultural Uses: Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or more: (a) Permitted Uses: Farms for orchards, trees, field crops, truck gardening, flowering gardening, and other similar enterprises carried on in the general field of agriculture. Raising, grazing, breeding, boarding or training of large or small animals: except concentrated lot feeding and commercial poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: Cats and dogs: limited to the keeping of not to exceed four (4) cats and /or four (4) dogs, over four (4) months of age. Small livestock: with the number of goats, sheep, and similar animals limited to twelve (12) per acre of total ground area, with no more than one (1) male goat. Cattle and horses: including calves and colts over six (6) months of age, with a maximum number of four (4) animals per acre of total ground area. Hogs: (nongarbage fed) with a maximum number of two (2) per acre of total ground area. The total number of such animals on any parcel or premises not to exceed five (5) over six (6) months of age. Combinations of the above animals, provided the total density on any given parcel shall not exceed that herein specified. In no event shall there be any limit to the permissible number of sheep which may be grazed per acre, where such grazing operation is conducted on fields for the purpose of cleaning up unharvested crops, stubble, volunteer or 5 -6 �4s yw Mw M wild growth, and further, where such grazing operation is not conducted for more than (4) weeks in any six (6) month period. Aviary: limited to fifty (50) birds per acre. Apiary: provided that all hives or boxes housing bees shall be placed at least four hundred (400) feet from any street, road or highway, any public school, park, property boundary or from any dwelling or place of human habitation other than that occupied by the owner or caretaker of the apiary. Additionally, a water source shall be provided on -site. Retail sale of products raised on property excluding retail nursery and sale of animals for commercial purposes. (b) Conditional Use Permit required: Worm farms. Frog farms. The raising of chinchilla, nutria, hamsters, guinea pigs, cavy, rats and similar small animals. Dog kennels, dog training schools, small animal shelters and dog breeding establishments with outside runs. Wholesale distributor and processor of nursery - plant stock. Retail nursery where incidental and contiguous to propagation of nursery stock and /or wholesale distributor. Outdoor storage and display are prohibited except for nursery - plant stock. .204 Setback, height and design guidelines for proposed residential development adjacent to scools, churches, and other sensitive uses: 5 -7 uaa a yr nnawmu �.uunavavavnn MEMORANDUM DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner I, & SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF OLEANDERS AT 9090 MANZANITA c`'�^Mohc l0]7 With regard to this item on the consent calendar, it was the City's intent to contact the property owner and explain the hazard that the plants pose to trail users. We would like to give the property owner the opportunity to remove the oleanders themselves within a reasonable amount of time or the City maintenance crew will remove the oleanders. The oleanders can possibly be removed in such a manner as to allow them to be transplanted elsewhere on the Nichols property. If so directed by Council, staff will contact the property owners to give adequate notice that the oleanders must be removed to protect the public health. I June E. Parry, Sr. Claims Representative \ • INSURANCE COMPANY OF :NORTH AMERICA _. 2 F. O. Box 5005 ��Qo'nQ�oD Upland, CA 91786 CITY OF RANCHO CU6Ah1ONCA 3 AOMINISTRr,TION (714) 981 -891L 4 MAY 18 AM - 5 7181IO11�111$ B 6 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, ) J! a corporation, ) . 7 ) _ 8 vs ) CLAIM FOR DAMAGES ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipality ) 9 corporation. ) 10 11 t. CLAIMANT: INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a corporation. 12 2. ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT: P. 0. Box 5005 Upland, CA 91786 13 - 3. NOTICE: Please send all notices to: 4 14 • INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 15 P. 0. Box 5005 Upland, CA 91786 16 4. BASIS FOR CLAIM: The Insurance Company of North America, a corporation, 17 was the Workers' Compensation insurance carrier for E. E. Smith, Los Angeles 18 Times, the alleged employer of Leonard Eugene Bennett on March 14, 1983. 19 That on the 14th day of March, 1983, Leonard Eugene Bennett was involved 20 in an auto accident located at the intarsection of .Jersey and Vincent, City 21 of Reecho located In the County of San Bernardino, California. 22 As a result of said aerident, Leonard Eu¢unc Bennett sustained injuries for 23 which he has suhmitted s j,Lm ag.jinst the claimant herein for benefits under 24 the Labor Code oC the State Of California. 25 - Claimant is informed and believes and thereon alleges that said 26 injuries and damages have Occurred as ❑ result of said Leonard Eugene Bennett • 27 having sustained an auto accident cis a result of a defective condition of 26 I the road and intersection. d IqI 1 2 3 4 3 6 7 8 9 10 I 12 13 14 15 16 17 IB 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1, i Claimant is further informed and believes and thereon alleges that said defective condition was present prior to March 14, 1983, and for a / period of time prior thereto, for which the municipal had notice of such defective condition, or with reasonable diligency would have had notice -of such defective condition. Upon information and belief, the claimant alleges that as a result of the injuries sustained by Leonard Eugene Bennett the claimant may be required to incur expenses consisting of medical care and disability benefits in a presently unascertained sum, anticipated to be in the area of $50,000.00, recovery for which will be sought from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I, the undersigned, state that I am the claims representative for the claimant in the above - entitled action; and have made verification on behalf of the claimant as there is no officer within this county. I have read the above and foregoing pleading and I know the contents thereof; that the same ' is true to my own knowledge except as to those matters which are therein stated on information or belief and as to those matters I believe it to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing, is true and correct. Executed in the City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on the 17th day of May, 1983. ,,June E. JParry I✓ cc: Leonard Eugene Bennett _Z- 3 f CLAIM FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY I. Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property must be filed not 100 days after Ile occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). TO: CITY OF LuC C, rn ah �� c Ere.,,. P32: 1- A, 4wzr Myi 76osr5� Name of Claimant Address Zip Phone rge %.3 "� tf -e ��Z %i2 rcr f4LC n Address to which Claimant wishes notices sent. ' WHEN did damage or injury occur? f'i�cruct 9 7, 1 f i 3 WHERE did damage or injury occur? j,?,y j' C,,t / /e. f/r _ ;q r Ca C4n,t- a 7Xe HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? _ 7 f-". '1�.� -�+� ..%�cL=z �s+i (�rLlttz- c�.i� ✓„� Cr.�vl Xtc�.i.L ,o<sc -c -:J WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, coused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if known) ,.J WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible) — ,2 .5 00• o _ ��t .�.,.c,�tt -;�"' U <, n ...� _ Ic.:r•. - <:t<_., S .,? l G� .2. 2S Total Amount Claimed: $ NAMES 40d9feQANQ11104UQAI NWortors and Hospitals: If`tfsnttaTNeTION Inter Z+J983-- ... --- — l r� DATE fa ?n1 COPYR.. l .e,_ .......IT R M....:..A_....:.1, _,......._....9.....1. -ems:_. _ APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC RNiRAGE IICENSI io Oeperrme.r of AICObd,c Pe.aaOe Cmnrel 1901 beoJ eY L,.n �Tti _mJ ram•mo. Call 95918 .e I....r......,..e... ».. u.d*. "dberebY eppLe. /er Lnvu duorbed er 1.6—: I. 1YPEISi OF IICENSEIS) FRE NO. yip Applied under Sec 2444 n ERNI.e DON: Nf Cfiv NO GEOGPANi CAE I"ued ]. NAMFIS OF APPIICANiIS) jl—etup Paml EFN,1. DOre zcaw :. , uSrloze 11. ] IYPE(T OF TR44ACTIONS) 17 , ba-.mur<o' cl L_a_enrn!0 FfE TYPE 3 Cf : /fIC ..T. C? 21 C. `. S _ I Name al Bmmen (�- S, lxar:on al Emmen— Numb<r end Street 8710 :SGh'»: ❑trees �Ce.M1 S_✓12 x.!_.ht!1- CLrrc�1 :1 ^RC;2CI:gruo :'C[! (L'ii. ".9720..._.. . C� Gry end Lp Cade Coonry 1G]O IrLCO _J.. ^.(,J 9• %JO u:ul 3:iA. TOTAL 6. 11 P ... .. L.;- d ]. w:e vreme< mid. She.,, of l,anre 42- 133467 Gp bm�nP Yo_ 9 Mellmq Add: , W d9ereer Irem 51— Number end Slreel 9. Mort rou emr be,, m— led al a 41.,1 F/, 10 Mort ym uer ri :l eer al the p.-i— el The AlmbeLe Be• mqe Cem:o1 Ao .. ngdolmm el he Ceper menl per nnq orb, An ,Y I1. Eeplvm a "YES' Pone: ru uemr 9 0: I0 - o. ene.Fmea .1 1, rh.11 be deemed par .1 11.1 .1Pl; e•. evr n E,, —TI er.d iI, en .ale 1--d 1-11, -ill 1— all IF. vl v and .ATE oI G.u1OMA County of _i.(1I1 LCI 'p6Y[11t10 .. .. ......... --------- I.. „APPLICANT SIGN '"IF �` r Oa Ne, Wrv. H.imr Thi1 FIT,. F'e, f)rr -I—el 11P Orly �ed !%,Rem :d•d eonv, C --------- wn•n. ..... _coPIFS NA. LED ---- _....`s.'�'�- %!3 ............... Rm..IFe..1 ----- ---- Pe:d e, ..... ...... ON No Y1 L APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 5/g3/�3 IS STATE OF CACFOeNIA cvu.ry oF_ hnn_ik=,Errdino__--------- Dvu.._..____ _ -------- . 16 N_a T_errl nl L_onr.eLl 17 , ba-.mur<o' cl L_a_enrn!0 18 I :1 No b.,111 Cf : /fIC ..T. I ' 19 lamn and Ar G rr aed Ln CodeCaP.ry S_✓12 x.!_.ht!1- CLrrc�1 :1 ^RC;2CI:gruo :'C[! (L'ii. ".9720..._.. . :''';mil i1F£JI;JmFio. -- Oa Ne, Wrv. H.imr Thi1 FIT,. F'e, f)rr -I—el 11P Orly �ed !%,Rem :d•d eonv, C --------- wn•n. ..... _coPIFS NA. LED ---- _....`s.'�'�- %!3 ............... Rm..IFe..1 ----- ---- Pe:d e, ..... ...... ON No Y1 L e.rY b�.�,.nA2y I C.T4 v( D6>TA(�p Crtv c( Otis ?ia� I i SCoTa S � nf_ i S Lce, -[D oti -((.0 lJeQi? CdPST •'u /:Ner v ue�1 AicD A..0 A-AJ e `t S7/'te i Su.�3(�i �t RcP12�i 4r �cNCD IiC( bul(.cuuDIIJC• ✓.bG[GTY I S -�o�En o .1'.5,� 0 • • • Ank �9 This project is the first phase of the top priority storm drain on the City's list. This phase will remove the summer -long nuisance water problem in the dip in Beryl Street north of 19th Street and reduce the nunber of closures needed during the winter. The project will also fill in the basin at the intersection and will replace it with a concrete channel from the dip to the bridge on 19th Street. This first phase project is a reduction in scope of the originally planned first phase which would also have provided a concrete channel from 19th Street along the wild ravine to Hellman Avenue. The reduction was made because unforeseen soil conditions and erosion damage has caused a delay in design work for the ravine portion. This portion is the most important part of the drain because it would eliminate the annual debris deposition and clogging problems experienced at the railroad tracks south of Base Line. It is possible, though doubtful, that design work and right -of -way negotiations can be finished in time for fall construction of the ravine portion. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the first phase of this project be approved for advertising early in June and that the portion from 19th Street to Hellman Avenue be approved for advertising upon plan completion, subject to construction during the dry season. Respectfully submitted LBH: AF R:jaa -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��cn,lrpb STAFF REPORT �� ' �_.� - IO F DATE: June 1, 1983 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Request for approval to advertise for bids for construction of a storm drain in Beryl Street from Alta Loma Park to 19th Street This project is the first phase of the top priority storm drain on the City's list. This phase will remove the summer -long nuisance water problem in the dip in Beryl Street north of 19th Street and reduce the nunber of closures needed during the winter. The project will also fill in the basin at the intersection and will replace it with a concrete channel from the dip to the bridge on 19th Street. This first phase project is a reduction in scope of the originally planned first phase which would also have provided a concrete channel from 19th Street along the wild ravine to Hellman Avenue. The reduction was made because unforeseen soil conditions and erosion damage has caused a delay in design work for the ravine portion. This portion is the most important part of the drain because it would eliminate the annual debris deposition and clogging problems experienced at the railroad tracks south of Base Line. It is possible, though doubtful, that design work and right -of -way negotiations can be finished in time for fall construction of the ravine portion. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the first phase of this project be approved for advertising early in June and that the portion from 19th Street to Hellman Avenue be approved for advertising upon plan completion, subject to construction during the dry season. Respectfully submitted LBH: AF R:jaa 0 • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer GU�MnI, �O Cr �o IZ - "s 19Y7 -J SUBJECT; Request for approval to advertise for bids for construction of a sidewalk on Base Line Road from Hellman Avenue to Alta Loma High School This project is part of a plan to improve pedestrian safety for high school students in the City, Plans have been completed and right -of -way negotia- tions are expected to be complete in time to enable summer construction, with completion before the beginning of the next school year. Right -of -way for the project will be donated by property owners on the seven parcels where sufficient width was not available. Obtaining the dedications was surprisingly difficult and it is possible that a short gap may remain on one lot. It seems that some residents involved were not as appreciative of the safety and drain- age benefits of the project as was expected. Any gaps remaining in this important project can be filled later using an assessment procedure. Funds for this project were obtained from a pedestrian safety grant and the money available, which has been received from the County, is not sufficient to allow purchase of the needed right -of -way. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the project be approved for immediate advertisement. Respectfully submitted, LBH:M :jaa n 0 r1 LJ 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Engineering Division Staffing Modifications `O G�!Gy�Cy 19i � The City's Traffic Analyst recently submitted her resignation and will be leaving June 10. Terry Nemer has done as excellent job of establishing a thoroughly professional, smooth running traffic function. In order not to let this function slip and to provide immediate continuity, Joe Stofa an Assistant Civil Engineer, has volunteered and been transferred to the position. The current Traffic Analyst's salary ranges from $1,769 to $2,159 per month. The Assistant Civil Engineer's range is somewhat higher at $1,650 to $2,259 per month. Because of the slight budgetary impact of this change, we are requesting Council authorization. The current Associate Civil Engineer's position is currently being underfilled with an Assistant Civil Engineer. The transfer to traffic of one Assistant Civil Engineer will leave vacant an Associate Civil Engineer position. It is requested that Council authorize recruitment of an Associate Civil Engineer to begin immediately. FISCAL ANALYSIS The proposed staff shifts will not impact the coming year's budget but could have future budgetary impact due to the modest increase in the classification of the traffic position. The total impact would not exceed $1,200 under the current salary schedule. To offset the potential long range effects of the shift, the part -time student aide position budgeted at $10,000 will be eliminated in the proposed budget. The net effect of the change will be an $8,000 +plus reduction in the upcoming budget. CONCLUSION The proposed staffing modification will result in a net savings to the City but will have a beneficial impact on the Division function by enabling continuity in the Traffic function and recruitment of a badly needed journeyman engineer. r CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Engieering Division Staffing Modification June 1, 1983 Page 2 REC"ENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve reclassification of the Traffic Analyst position to Assistant Civil Engineer and authorize filling the vacant Associate Civil Engineer position. Also that staff be instructed to unfund the part -time student aide for the 1983 -84 fiscal budget. Respectfully submittgd, LBH: a l 0 11 • ! 1 LJ • OTMV nV D A TTOUn OTTC a Mnvr A STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Cucamonga Creek Beautification Sidewalk Extension `o C4 7 z � rr is p F 1977 As a part of the Cucamonga Creek Beautification Project, sidewalk construction has been included to complete connections with bridge structures through the length of the flood control right -of -way. The Corps of Engineers has indicated that this work will be deleted in the absence of City funding. The estimated cost of these sidewalks is $6,216.00. Because the walks will be needed in the future, it is recommended that they be funded at this time to avoid disruption and added cost in the future. The walks would be funded under beautification funds. RECOMMENDATION: It is recomneded that Council authorize $6,216.00 from Beautification Funds for the sidewalk construction in conjunction with the Cucamonga Creek Beautification. Respectfully submif.ted, r LBHH jSa Attachment h) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND FLOOD CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL — : ;,. -"'� PUBLIC WORMS C/E Improvement Project Erosion Control Project 825 East Third Street • San Bemardino, CA 92415 • (714)381-?679 y._� }+ nq... JOHN R.SHONE :+tlm,mrtnmrfor PULi�s Gentlemen: w The Corps of Engineers is in their final stage of design for the Erosion � B. L. INGBAM either sidewalks along the bridges, or tying sidewalks to access ramps, as oi. «mr May 10, 1983 • the local agency if it is requested by the local agency. The estimated cost File: 1- 350/1.00 of these sidewalks within the City of Rancho Cucamonga boundary is $6,216, to City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hobbs City Engineer Re: Zone 1, Cucamonga Creek C/E Improvement Project Erosion Control Project Along Deer Creek Channel Gentlemen: The Corps of Engineers is in their final stage of design for the Erosion Control Project along the Deer Creek Channel. Included in their design are either sidewalks along the bridges, or tying sidewalks to access ramps, as indicated in the preliminary plans. It is called to your attention that this item is a local item, to be paid by • the local agency if it is requested by the local agency. The estimated cost of these sidewalks within the City of Rancho Cucamonga boundary is $6,216, to be paid by City funds. It is requested that you advise this office as soon as possible if you desire to have the Corps of Engineers contractor build this item as part of the Corps of Engineers Erosion Control Project, and deposit $6,216 into Flood Control District funds. Your prompt reply will be greatly appreciated, and if you have any questions, please call Mr. Mina S. Ghaly, Chief, Federal Projects at (Area Code 714) 383 -2547. Very truly yours, S. l.. INGRAM, Flood Control Engineer By pack ruse, Chief Divlsion JWK: MSG: gbs cc: Dennis Marfice, C/E • • • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician Goo uucn,tiro'k. >' S U.. 4> 1977 SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 7646, Surety and Agreement submitted by Calvin Morgan located on the south side of Hillside between Carnelian and Beryl Parcel Map 7646 was approved by Planning Commission on September 8, 1982 for the subivision of 1.42 acres of land into 2 parcels within the R -1 zone, located on the south side of Hillside between Carnelian and Beryl. Surety in the amount of $1,650.00 and an agreement has been submitted by Mr. Morgan to guarantee construction of drainage facilities on -site. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 7646, Surety and Agreement and authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign same map. Respectfully subm' ted, LBH fJ1K:j as Attachments 7 CITY OF RANCI III CUC:AMONGA EN'(,INEI:RI \(, DIVISION VICINITY MAP!—, Ivi] .. I titlr; P_ra. lv P'R? T= s TENTATIVE PARCEL, AP NO, 7646 karm N bM A Y Fp W g Aw FA iIi'4I F. kp•il Vi / (yplr /1 . , flv,Wf9 fi'• {N //,�1 Yf.9i-MYII /IHq Fw4, ftlflk.S U10 Fn Mw POW V q 1Ri fA O� .M nl�pnr / r e 7 , // ' �Mr. / \ .•t�l' 7 ty�9 �.. ...� . r i:�� Y. I •'A n � I 'i I I'NiN.q rs.WT I' arl wr °A'v lMl lNr• ,.I evn.+ sree_ f" °l Mry jW4AYp IfPMIB9 l'� MI IHI Iq YKlhVfY A610 � lnvarxr�/ III . Pi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 7646 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, herelnafter referr- ed to as the City, by and between said City and Calvin 'd_ Horgan and Rosemary Morgan here, natter referred to as LhC eloper. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop sent aln real property in said City located on [he south side of Hillside pead was.. of clerk. . and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the axe( ut ion of Lh is agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: I. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at • developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof, 2. This agreement shall he effective on the date of the resolution of the Co a moll of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera- tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cast estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes there;,. 4, If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the pro' /isloos of this agreement, the City shall have the light at any time to cause said previsions t0 be completed by any law- ful means, and thereupon to recover fror said Developer and /or his Surety the foil cost and expense incurred In so doing. 5, Construction perm, is shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the of f, C of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right - cf -w ly, and the developer shall conduct Such work in full Co-pliante with the regulations contained tbere,I. Non- c.-pl, pIle may re suit In stopping of the work by tha City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right -of -way lwornvenent work required shall • he conitYnCted rn conformanc^ with ao proke'I improvement plans, St,nrllyd Spec,ficat Tans, and Standard Drawings and any special -I- 0 • 0 amendments thereto. Construction sbe 11 inn lade any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or omm iss i ons discovered during can$truc - tion ih a 11 be corrected upon the direction of the C'. t Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligent - ly pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay i completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for repl ancient, relocations, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the re9uired work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rack and other debr.s from the public right -of -way 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said Improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: M CITY CP ILV{]D 0.GNQGV • QNi111CFitr4 h\914Td) ISTIhN]i _ Elt]py- ]h9341' PF]MIT FF]: SplQI1LE For TWMv.at o(: PM 7646 late: 2/22/83 Caputed Uv: C G Ena ineer ^a File Fc ferencc: a cane City IMq. \o, gea deposits. Oocs net include current fee to vmiting pernut or Pavorent deposits. (AM1SI1 riw = EST1 \tYtE ITL�I 4tr/1 \TITY I:IT LN I'P Q5T j gY0. \T P.C.C, Curb - 02^ C.F. L.F. P.C.C. Curb - C.F. P.C.C. Curb only 61 C.F. A.C. Berm (5200 min.) 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk S" 13, No Approach P.C.C. Gross nutter st Street d Rovation Pryparat on of S.bg Preparation eg tehBusde flushed Aggregate t 9a sc (per inch thick) A.C. (over 1900 tons) A.C. (900 to 0900 cons) A.C. (under 500 to 900 tons) A.C. (under tre tons) Patch A.C. (trench) A" thick A.C. Overlay Adjust sever le to grade Adjust sew clean er clean out to grade Adjust Light valves to grade Lights s Street Signs Street Trees Rock Fill daylight line 20 S.F Graded "V" ditch 207 L.F 24" C,M.P, drop inlet 1 En. O];smicriu; R T CWfI M:l�: Cl' Qfil� '{DIAL gT5'IfO.[,71IX4 ft]3]S BY PII O�LL PIIi1TN(.iNC}i fiLliPa}' (IOmul LV}'JIt 1V)1Y \f'i li hYl. .S PLLRI'll' (bC "I IN ;1 \I:IRIYi I \SPPlTI(A' RT )tnU ?Bf. \TIrN SL ir!fIl' IG. <II) .3. �7 • L.S. 200.00 L.S. 300.00 L.S. 500.00 0 550 • r� �J FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type; Pass Book Account Principal Amount: $1,100 Name and address of surety: Pomona First Federal Alta Lora Office MATERIAL AID LRB00. PAYMENT P. 0. Box 38, RanchoCUCamonga 91701 Principal Amount: $550 Type: same Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: -0- Name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: -0- Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these_ presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all • formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures. Date _".,70 -�`_b • / /�vv��_fi __.Developer /�� Stgndture- s -fin 't Date h =n - f_ by 2 4z •— 3i,_Ls- ,Developer SiJgoa ure ! too Accepted City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: O ate: 0 DLlILLOPERS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTORI2ED _A- • RESOLUTION NO. * '(/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7646, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7646), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7646, submitted by Calvin W. Morgan, Subdivider, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of Hillside between Carnelian and Beryl, being a division of Lot 11 of Tract No. 6760, Map Book 86, pages 38 -39, Records of San Bernardino County, California was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7646 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: is 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and is 2. That said Parcel Map No. 7646 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: auren M. Wasserman, City C erk Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor ( r. 7 D a r,mV nr RANCGi(1 (:TTCAM(1NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF OLEANDERS AT 9090 MANZANITA BACKGROUND: The property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Nichols, at the northwest corner of Manzanita and Beryl have planted Oleanders on the street side of their fence facing Beryl, Exhibit "A ". This portion of Beryl is designated as a Community Trail. The recent widening project for Beryl has made this a more usable trail to Heritage Park, and additionally functions as a school route to Alta Loma Junior High School. The Equestrian Advisory Committee is concerned that the toxicity of the Oleanders poses a hazard to pedestrian and equestrian trail users. Horses are particularly susceptible to Oleander poisoning. Eating even small quantities of prunings or dead leaves can be fatal if untreated. RECOMMENDATION: The Equestrian Advisory Committee recommends that the City Co— unc—ildirect staff to contact the property owner for the removal of the Oleanders from the trail parkway and establish a policy prohibiting the planting of toxic plant materials along Community Trails. Res ectfully mitted, ick omez ity Planner RG:DC:jr Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Resolution Cow ") ki l$ I i° \ ®«� — / \ 7 � _7/ a \4� ) ,\) CITY(* Rw &q K) EEC%%I)(x<; PLANNING DIVISION /! \ \| \ ,x, , . � / 44. } \ � N m, ITEM: m �s� any -A— m 0 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING A POLICY PROHIBITING THE PLANTING OF TOXIC PLANTS ALONG COMMUNITY TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, it is the City Council's desire to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the Trails Element of the General Plan establishes a Community Trail System; and WHEREAS, the Community trails serve the recreational needs of the community and provide pathways to schools, parks and shopping areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby declare its policy to be: SECTION 1: That the planting of poisonous plant material along Community trails shall be prohibited within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. • AYES: NOES: n ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. 'dasserman, City Clerk 0 • F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 r=', 16Ee V TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7834 located on the north side of Via E1 Dorado and the west side of Sunstone submitted by Robert Jensen The subject map submitted by Robert Jensen was tentatively approved on March 23, 1983 by the Planning Commission to divide one acre of land into 2 parcels within the R -1 zone. Off -site improvements have been previously installed with the exception of drive approaches. These approaches will be constructed at time of building permit. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign said parcel map and submit to the County Recorder for recording. RL�tfully su bmitt LBH: :jaa ti c� 11 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 7034 I,N THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BEING A DIVISION OF PARCEL t, OF PARCEL NAP NO 5269, PARCEL MAP BOOK 53, PATE 62, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LINVILLE- $ANDERSON H ASSOCIATES 15' LOCAL - -___- "' FEEDER — — TRAIL - — - - - - -- -- • -- `-- -asur= Vi VIA -�'-zHz I II'y I� �'EC'OORADO 5A Xii :a C WER - CiCVE LOPER +✓w r �l ipr /rb UTIl ITIES mar ,e e.wefc.'r•. -� VICINITY MAP 0 • 1 OS/ f fq.�'N fI /aM 4• E yrbria, :o F,e/ BEfJCH M1IARN � 6l 1n A" Ydlida NOTES f M.n W bre' Nnae VICINITY MAP 0 • . RESOLUTION NO. * ' /,j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7834 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0, 7834) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7834, submitted by Robert Jensen and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of Via E1 Dorado and the West side of Bunstone Avenue, being a division of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 5269, Parcel Map Book 33, page 82, records of San Bernardino County was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 7834 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 7834 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present to the County Recorder to be filed for record. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. 'dasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor • • 11 n,mv nn n r" e .R 111 n STAFF REPORT L?Q 5l J Y 7� 2 O• p � GATE: June 1, 1983 E U s> TO: City Council and City Manager 19" FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for Minor Development Review 82 -08 located at 8270 Foothill Blvd. Minor Development Review 82 -08 is a Chinese Restaurant located at 8270 Foothill Blvd., north side of Foothill Blvd., east of the Sycamore Inn. The developer is requesting an extension of time to complete the on -site improvements. An agreement and bonds guaranteeing the completion of improvement was accepted by City Council on August 4, 1982 and expires May 4, 1983. A six -month extension to complete these on -site improvements would expire November 4, 1983, This expiration date would coincide with the expiration date of November 5, 1983 for the off -site improvements. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a six -month extension for M.D..R. 82 -08 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully submitted, LS .aK.jaa Attachment �� l CCCF,fIGI'.GA .�n'L I'� Fr•�" P.M r� i3tg�;Oi«i;2µiF�3i4;ais =Y OF cu:AMONGA Community Development Department Planninc Division v. o. Box 807 Rancho Jucamonza, 91730 Attention: Kurt Johnston Dear tor. Johnston: 1723? rialnut Street ?our'.'str 'ialley, ::A 927'0^ (714) 343 -7507 30 ;:arch, 1983 • In reference to MDR 82 -09, under Paragraph 3 of the Smnrovement agreement signed 15 July, 1982, we request an elghteen month extension of the agreement. The circumstances • which have made this necessary are as follows: 1. Hlaher costs than expected in remodeling of the China Alley Restaurant coupled with the delay in Its opening for business has depleted our financial reserves. 2. The continued rec�sslon has resulted In higher vacancies than expected. 3. The current, financial market is in such that It Is imnosslble., or far too costly, to obtain the needed financing to complete your requirements. If you have ar7 questtors or would like to discuss this further with me, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above number or addr °ss. Thznic you. C, lB: ob Sl ^.ce re ly, j l -7) I Gary D. iSou.her 0% • 0 I Ili F F-7 �T "Am U TT 4 f f�l 471 ctt t�l 1971 CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCA.\I()N(;,\ A N T tit [ v ; Minor Director Review 82-08 page, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW 82 -08 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Gary D, Bougher, Margaret A. Bougher and Gerald T. Broyles referred to as the Developer, WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement with the City as a requisite to final approval of the development, and WHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said improvement agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The completion date of the terms of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of six (6) months from the date of expiration of the said agreement. 2. Increase in improvement securities to reflect current improvement costs shall be furnished by the developer with this agreement and shall he approved by the City Attorney. 3. The required bond and the additional principal amounts thereof are set forth on the attached sheet. 4. All other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall • remain the same. As evidence of Understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to Comply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described improvement security, and nos affixed his signature hereto: FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: Surety: No Additional Address: MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: Surety: No Additional Address: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTING BOND Additional Cash Deposit: - -- MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND Principal amount: - -- To be postal nripr to IVIltan[e of the projeCt by the City, .0 w • «.u..o..0 «.. u.. u..«. uu.w a «w«.0 •.. u«u «w.•u ««.... a « «...• CITY eP Pty Cin) CUCAMONGA DEVELOPER c CALIFORNIA, a vunie,11 rnrporitinn .Ion i1. MtkP, 15, :1d Yar Attest: __ APPROBED AS TO FORM : iinlo M;- aasrerman,-F+i7 -r7i " -- NOTE; vs r EL O'r En's Siuhni UnE nu Si nE nui AWIEEU WYpO CA•..:np 1101111 • RESOLUTION NO. * `7il. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82 -08 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on June 1, 1983 by Gary Bougher as Developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Minor Development Review No. 82 -08; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk EJ Jon D. Mikels, Mayor • F_ IL I nrmv nu o n ATPUn PTT!` A M(1 \T1A _•.re,. STAFF REPORT 4„ DATE: June 1, 1983 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7832 located at the northwest corner of Hillside and Moonstone Avenue The subject map submitted by H & S Properties was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission to divide 1.839 acres of land into 4 parcels in the R -1 zone. Since off -site improvements are existing, no bonding is required. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign said map and submit to the County Recorder for recording. Respectfully submitted, V8H LBHti Jaa Attachments r � Jr r ji i t5' LOCAL FEEDER a TRAIL v �I I 9 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 7032 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BEING A DIVISION OF PARCEL 4, OF PARCEL MAP NO 5269, PARCEL MAP BOOK 53, PAGE B', RFCOPJS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF eALIFORNIA LINVILLE- S4NOERSONB ASSOCIATES PIA& D lflllll PAIL vDz' tlyto • • op q Alp alp 6V 9 Aivra- ckveewev Nrf Az��In i/» ny .pqi N/N IvW Yrn /W war dbn. f� kl 4 w.�rys 4...ry bb Jre.ei vewb C�b�.q_ a Y. b G+e o�Rl.esw Cen lZw. w ro..e fiieon.+pn. m r..» mAi vn'.a..o Ae � I.b raa.G �N✓ !w••m AMYv AWLS' f4m (N:.r1A: Fei 4 • RESOLUTION No. * ^, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7832 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7832) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7832, submitted by H & S Properties and consisting of 4 parcels, located at the northwest corner of Hillside Road, being a division of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 5269, Parcel Map Book 53, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 7832 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 7832 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present to the County Recorder to be filed for record. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren hl. 14asserman, City Clerk Is Jon D. Mike Is ,Mayor 0 • C" J 01T fVJ D A X7 T1l1 hTTI A wnnwTn STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician 19-- SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 6114, Bonds and Agreement and Lien Agreement submitted by William Campbell located at the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Ramona Ave. Parcel Map 6114, submitted by William Campbell for the division of 3.25 acres of land into 3 parcels within the C -2 zone was tentatively approved on October 10, 1980 by the City Engineer. Bonds and an agreement to guarantee the construction of off -site improvements have been submitted. Also submitted is a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of a landscaped median island on Foothill Blvd. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution to approve Parcel Map 6114 and accept the Bonds, Agreement and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. Respectfully sub fitted, LBH: :jaa Attachments lc MML I BLVD, r- L tit le. CITY 01: RANCI 10 CUC,\,Nlo.'NGi\ Parcel Map 6_1,J& ENCINEERING DIVISION NT ViClNiTY NIAII %-A, , I tit le. CITY 01: RANCI 10 CUC,\,Nlo.'NGi\ Parcel Map 6_1,J& ENCINEERING DIVISION NT ViClNiTY NIAII %-A, , I • RESOLUTION NO. * '- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6114 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6114), BONDS, AGREEMENT, AND A REAL PROPERTY CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6114, submitted by William Campbell and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue, being a division of Lots 122, 123, 124 and 125 of Tract No. 3054, as recorded in Book 54, pages 14 and 15 of map, County of San Bernardino, State of California was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6114 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, installation of a landscaped median island established as a prerequisite to recordation of Parcel Map 6114 has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 6114 be and the same • is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present to the County Recorder to be filed for record. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ,Ion D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk I 1 L J I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1983 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Authorization to Extend City Office Complex Lease Agreement for One Additional Year to Expire June 30, 1985 BACKGROUND �cnst 1977 A. H. Reiter Development has requested the City of Rancho Cucamonga consider extending the City Office complex lease agreement (at same rental rate) for an additional year to continue through June 30, 1985 (present lease will expire June 30, 1984). If the City is agreeable with this extension, then A. H. Reiter Development will provide an additional seven parking spaces located on the east side of 9360 Base Line (adjacent to Dependable Auto Repair) exclusively for City /employee vehicles, and a (City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Hall) monument sign. Attached is a letter from A. H. Reiter Development proposing and discussing this matter. ANALYSIS The current rental rate for the City Office complex is very competitive in respect to other available office space in town. Below is a comparison of our present rental rates (their classified use), and the prevailing rental market in Rancho Cucamonga: Comm /Industrial Community Develop. (6680 sq. ft.) Professional Admin /Finance /Com Sery 4000 sq. ft. Industrial storage 1200 sq. ft. Present City Offices .436 sq. ft. .65 sq. ft. .28 sq. ft. r Local Office Rental Rates .50 - .50 sq. ft. 70 - .75 sq. ft. 45 - .50 sq. ft. Staff Report Extend Lease Agreement Page 2 As can be seen, our present rental rates are ranging between .07 and .23 per square foot less than the current market rate for comparable space in Rancho Cucamonga. The offer by A, H. Reiter Development appears to be a good opportunity for the City to extend a reasonable rental agreement for an additional year with no increase. Additionally, they are proposing to make some on site improvements (added parking spaces and signage) which will assist in alleviating parking congestion and aid in our visibility to the public. Accept A. H. Reiter Development's proposal to extend City Office complex rental agreement (at no rate increase) through June 30, 1985 -- contingent that on site improvements of seven additional parking spaces (located at east end of 9360 Base Line, valued at $5,600), and placement of a City of Rancho Cucamonga monument sign (valued at $1,500) be completed by January 1, 1984. RAR:mk Attachment • • J • • U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: May 25, 1983 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department By: Mary Whitney, Administrative Secretary Community Services Department Subject: Emergency Roof Repair - Lions Park Community Center *o c�;cn.arp to Iz The roof of the Lions Park Community Center is in dire need of immediate repair. The following is a listing of bid proposals: 1. Osage Roofing Company Rancho Cucamonga Price: $4,000.00 Guarantee: S years 2, Dependable Roofers Upland Price: $5,188.10 Guarantee: None 3. Weatherseal Roof Company Rancho Cucamonga Price: $5,367.00 Guarantee: None 197 Award bid to Osage Roofing Company of Rancho Cucamonga. They were the lowest bidder and the only one with a guarantee. As this is emergency repair work, we request expenditure be authorized from General Fund - Reserves. rir) //1 0 • I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1483 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSOCIATED ITEMS } z 1977 After 18 months of preparation and review of the Etiwanda Plan, the process is approaching its conclusion. The following items remain to be addressed by the City Council: 1. Conclusion of Specific Plan review. 2. Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. Adoption of General Plan Amendment 83 -01B. 4. Adoption of the Specific Plan. The attached materials contain information, Resolutions and Ordinance needed to complete the review process. Staff will be available to provide additional information if desired. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the attached materials and take action on adoption of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Impact Report, and General Plan amendment. Respectful /lyyy /submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:OK: jr Attachments J;i ITEM 1: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW Attached for your information you will find map and text revisions based on recent Council direction. These include an up -to -date Land Use Map, as well as some of the requested changes in the text. No action or discussion on these items is necessary, unless additional changes are desired by the Council. New Items: Water Conservation: Recently, staff has been contacted by the Cucamonga County Water District. The District expressed a concern that the issue of water resources be addressed in the Plan. Attached for your consideration (Exhibits 1 & 2) is a list of policies and specific measures designed to minimize run -off, enhance groundwater recharges, and conserve water in general. The proposed measures are not inconsistent with other elements of the Specific Plan. ACTION REQUIRED: It is suggested that the proposed additions be considered for incorporation into the Plan text. • • /� S 21.83 r NC '$RlliLi�A // VL II VL I OR Lek O L S vr VL I; IVL `\ VL C =�I ER Saewl AVE. II = L* FC / J — Os VL VL VL ROUTE HIGHLAND LA don li HIGHND AVE VL — _ L:_ L III L JL e H OS 4 ICTORIA )1 L 'V�OTOPIA • I PAPR IApE\ �` a.V ..fu VL i L ...o �^ �c 0 2C� M V� _ =res• i I _ „6ASE:INE 1'� �L • M rte- P 4,6 *Master Plan M F required _ Ir' LM I'M Parks(P) I fc ° T OP LM s Residential (EP,VL,L,LM,M) JMr.A A_l I____ w Y - -- Commercial (cs,s c,cc,rlc) cOMM• / LM LM P Open Space (os) r1-1 C M "' M E :is.ing Schools (E,J,H) D. PARK �' M S - Proposed chools(e,l,h) \ M (P LM aes LM Office/Professional(op) AP POI u title + n GEN' LAND USE upa.7cr�r IND., a DISTRICTS P e46 t 0 CIRCULATION Bypass Road •- Based on the Council's direction, the following language is being added to the Specific Plan text (Page 3 -7): .700 Provide for planned rather than piecemeal access into undeveloped areas east of East Avenue. .800 Provide for alternate access to the high school site. .900 To assist in achieving policies .700 and .800 above, consider construction of a north -south bypass road in the vicinity of East Etiwanda Creek, should additional flood control land become available. Rt. 30 Freeway Study Zone The following was added to the text of the Plan (Page 5 -7): .400 Land within 660' of the proposed Rt. 30 Freeway: • All properties located within 660' of the proposed Route 30 freeway right -of -way shall be considered to be within a Special Freeway Study Zone. Within this zone, density increases or other incentives may be considered, if in the opinion of the City Council such incenties are necessary to accomplish the following: (a) Protect the Route 30 corridor right -of -way. (b) Provide for adequate buffering of freeway - related impacts, including noise, circulation and visual impacts. • 24 T 11/ • YICTOFq -- � � li9! / V4P6 L�E� � it � r EE[Minor Roads Major Roads Freeways BLVD I I nnanv, ww. i title-- -�__----- _ -.- - -= figure CONCEPTUAL 4.2_1 CIRCULATION ; I CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT . 9641 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD . CUCAMONGA. CALIF. 91790 ADDITIONS TO ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN 0 PART I: POLICY & CONCEPTUAL PLAN 3.9 - WATER RESOURCES objective: Provide for the protection, enhancement and development of the water resources within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Policies: .100 - Protect and develop the capability of replenishing ground- water supplies. All areas under development will require mitigation to the maximum extent possible to reduce loss of groundwater replenishment /recharge. .200 - Preserve and protect the quality and quantity of groundwater. • 300 - Encourage and promote programs to conserve water. PART II: REGULATORY PROVISIONS 5.44 - WATER RESOURCES 100 - Develop areas suitable for groundwater percolation /recharge/ replenishment. 200 - Develop /design drainage patterns that will capture to the maximum extent possible run -off from low precipitation to high precipitation conditions. 1 • 11! CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT . 9641 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD . CUCAMONGA, CALIF. 91730 • 300 - Develop structures /systems to retain precipitation and run -off for onsite lots, recreation /common use areas and for the overall development of the area. Measures to he used to minimize run -off and enhance infiltration /percolation include: dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks /bricks, terraces, diversions, run -off spreaders, seepage /percolation pits, and recharge basins. .400 - Water conservation measures and techniques are required, and include, but are not limited to, the following: low volume flush toilets, flow restrictors in showers, faucets, sinks, etc., use of drought resistant, low maintenance plantings and vegetation, use of drip irrigation systems, low flow sprinkler heads, and moisture sensors to control automatic timers. • 1 � _ CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 9sn snv e]PYnP W.YO t. -•rON .n C>..IF )n]J VICTOR A. CHERBAK. JR., P..n May 16, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Otto Kroutil Associate Planner Re: Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan psv .11. F-WAN L u FRANK ESIN SKY LLOYD W. MICHAEL D .... I... EARLE R. ANDERBO ROBERT NEWFELD BEVERLY E. BRADEN Gentlemen: • The Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan has been reviewed by the Cucamonga County Water District. The Etiwanda Planning Area has a potential for substantial development; therefore, it is believed that the issue of water resources should be addressed in the Specific Plan. Water resources in the Southern California area are limited and therefor must be protected relative to quality and quantity. With increased development, run -off will also increase. Effort must be made on a community basis to preserve and protect our water re- sources by increasing groundwater percolation /recharge capability on the basis of individual lot facilities and overall developmental planning. It is important to mitigate the long -term effect of development with regard to groundwater quantity and quality. It is recommended that additions be made to the Etiwanda Specific Plan as paragraphs 3.9 and 5.4. These additions are contained in enclosure 1 as recommended additions to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Preservation, and protection of our water resources are vital to the community and is well recognized throughout the Southern California area and in the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT • 9641 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD • CUCAMONGA. CALIF. 91730 • May 16, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan is appreciated. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call upon us. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT -'Z District Engineer HMO:bf U E 0 ITEM 2: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT BACKGROUND: Prior to the adoption and approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and associated General Plan Amendment 83,018, certification of the final Environmental Impact Report is required. The purpose of this certification is to assure that the report adequately covers all reasonable environmental concerns related to the Specific Plan. The impact report serves several functions. It 1. identifies potential environmental impacts, 2. calls for specific mitigation measures (that have since been incorporated into the Specific Plan text), 3. outlines other alternatives, and 4. identifies impacts that are unavoidable. All these items are contained in the EIR Summary for your review. • Attached for your consideration you will find the following items: o Summary of comments received on the EIR and responses by the Planning Commission. o Revisions to the dwelling number estimates based on the Council's latest land use modifications. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council conduct a public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report and consider adoption of the attached Resolution. J r'.� V] C C Summary of Etiwanda Plan EIR Responses COMMENT DISCUSS in ^seater detail ,methods pf collection and dis- posal of wastewater. Provided a list of general recommenda- tions on water con- servation and flood damage prevention, Concerts were over spreading grounds within the area and City- County coordi- nation to prevent trespassing on this property owned by the 5an Bernardino County Flood Control District. Stressed need for water conservation and identified con- cern for the area north of Highland, designated as an on- Site waste menace - ment zone. Update information on treatment plant expansion. Analyze rate of wastewater generation and transport and treat- ment capacities. Comments regard util izing tine we rot-case SC'nann fur trnlflc gere•'otinn and niti- gatign - easw'es and air gwli'.y. Also, sin -n • Q �i 11 p n nstcd no M a fur an'In na;'e. RESPONSE Sewer systems South of Highland. Capacity for Sewage treatment okey. Septic systers north of Highland 'With review authority by SFRWJCo `or degradation prevention. Items appropriate far Rancho Cucamonga (circled on attached list) are being considered on a City -wide basis', others will be retained for con- sideration an a project by project basis. The City will coordinate with the SBGCD as devel- opeent occurs adjacent to their property. Refer to list of water conservation measures supplied by the Dept. of Water Resources. Stress that the area north of Highland is very low den- sity and monitoring for degradation prior to development approval will occur. Anticipated transport and treatment capacities were planned for the current General Plan. The Speci- fic Plan will generate considerably less waste- water due to the reduction in number of OU's. The Specific Plan utilized EIR RE'l TS; CN/ Rc CBY Ea DA: 10'I Add new information to EiR. Ensure that SARdOCB approves septic systems for residential tract development. The EIR should include a statement that those recommendations not In use City -wide should be considered on a project by project basis for the Etiwanda area. Add a mitigation measure to the EIR to ensure coordination for the provision of security measures with the SBCFCO. mitigation measures for air nnality as specified in the uir rent 9rnrral Plan. N.tigation measures such as carpooling and pblic transit are a hart of the irara;mrtatien Svsie.'^a nano +rnr t, 1, r. rvr d,1 qn radii ty x also �I esinpa tie In the 'G r Trat'i vvl,v rs weir stn - dind in Itop for R.C. In rlatimi to t ^c rrninn, win, i ^•I 1110nit top i str¢t�. nn P•• ewaway. frnsi tars tar inn Ln..a r. -n a n•i worn hv.rd nn ihr L. 'rt n,c; nr aloe will denIny r.p irU ^n, mna. will pf n n P r a rr. S1 r r,t -rd to ,,..��i'w flows. 1 -f None. Incorporate sewerage generation figures into EIR with updated infor- mation on plant expan- sion. The EIR should point out the worst -case scenario. Remove referenCeS to the prnoosed Route 3D as a mitigation nnasore. SANL -A FNA REGIONAL BATE? 7 C L: r'! CC.•CECL RGARD OEP:0.`F'.- OF WATEP. ?Eg GURCES HETFD PDL:-AII wATE=, 0;5raur CUCAVD`iGA COUNTY NAT:? DISTRICT • C'r11bD BASIN ML'LI::PAI 'WATER DISTRICT DE PAR *N' -N' " TRFSS:^ TA71'N, DI STAIC] OR V] C C Summary of Etiwanda Plan EIR Responses COMMENT DISCUSS in ^seater detail ,methods pf collection and dis- posal of wastewater. Provided a list of general recommenda- tions on water con- servation and flood damage prevention, Concerts were over spreading grounds within the area and City- County coordi- nation to prevent trespassing on this property owned by the 5an Bernardino County Flood Control District. Stressed need for water conservation and identified con- cern for the area north of Highland, designated as an on- Site waste menace - ment zone. Update information on treatment plant expansion. Analyze rate of wastewater generation and transport and treat- ment capacities. Comments regard util izing tine we rot-case SC'nann fur trnlflc gere•'otinn and niti- gatign - easw'es and air gwli'.y. Also, sin -n • Q �i 11 p n nstcd no M a fur an'In na;'e. RESPONSE Sewer systems South of Highland. Capacity for Sewage treatment okey. Septic systers north of Highland 'With review authority by SFRWJCo `or degradation prevention. Items appropriate far Rancho Cucamonga (circled on attached list) are being considered on a City -wide basis', others will be retained for con- sideration an a project by project basis. The City will coordinate with the SBGCD as devel- opeent occurs adjacent to their property. Refer to list of water conservation measures supplied by the Dept. of Water Resources. Stress that the area north of Highland is very low den- sity and monitoring for degradation prior to development approval will occur. Anticipated transport and treatment capacities were planned for the current General Plan. The Speci- fic Plan will generate considerably less waste- water due to the reduction in number of OU's. The Specific Plan utilized EIR RE'l TS; CN/ Rc CBY Ea DA: 10'I Add new information to EiR. Ensure that SARdOCB approves septic systems for residential tract development. The EIR should include a statement that those recommendations not In use City -wide should be considered on a project by project basis for the Etiwanda area. Add a mitigation measure to the EIR to ensure coordination for the provision of security measures with the SBCFCO. mitigation measures for air nnality as specified in the uir rent 9rnrral Plan. N.tigation measures such as carpooling and pblic transit are a hart of the irara;mrtatien Svsie.'^a nano +rnr t, 1, r. rvr d,1 qn radii ty x also �I esinpa tie In the 'G r Trat'i vvl,v rs weir stn - dind in Itop for R.C. In rlatimi to t ^c rrninn, win, i ^•I 1110nit top i str¢t�. nn P•• ewaway. frnsi tars tar inn Ln..a r. -n a n•i worn hv.rd nn ihr L. 'rt n,c; nr aloe will denIny r.p irU ^n, mna. will pf n n P r a rr. S1 r r,t -rd to ,,..��i'w flows. 1 -f None. Incorporate sewerage generation figures into EIR with updated infor- mation on plant expan- sion. The EIR should point out the worst -case scenario. Remove referenCeS to the prnoosed Route 3D as a mitigation nnasore. REVISIONS OF 5 -21- ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN Residential Land Use Categories and Dwelling Unit Range Land Use Category/ Dwelling Unit Range Density Range Acreage Low High Estate Residential 142.00 71.00 142.00 (.1 -1 d.u. /ac) 405.00 1,418.00 Low Medium Very (1 -2 d.u. /acre) 807.00 807.00 1,619.00 Low (2 -4 d.u. /ac) 405.00 810.00 1,620.00 Low Medium (4 -8 d.u. /ac) 291.00 1,164.00 2,328.00 Medium (8 -14 d.u. /ac) 211.00 1,688.00 2,954.00 Total 1,856.00 4,540.00 8,663.00 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: Estimated Buildout Land Use Category Acreage Dwelling Units Estate Residential 142.00 114.00 Very Low 807.00 1,210.00 Low 405.00 1,418.00 Low Medium 291.00 1,892.00 Medium 211.00 2,321.00 Total 1,856.00 6,955.00 3 -38 r! n it • • J GENERAL PLAN/ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: Summary of Significant Land Use Differences General Plan 3 Residential Land Use Districts 2 Commercial Land Use Districts Located Dwelling Units Low: 3393 High: 10,472 s Etiwanda Specific Plan 5 Residential Land Use Districts Shift in density location (various areas) 4 Commercial Land Use Districts defined and located Dwelling Units Low: 4540 High: 8663 Estimated: 6955 *Due to lack of specific development standards in the General Plan it is not possible to estimate the probable number of dwelling units at planned build -out. 3.5.2 Impacts The proposed Specific Plan will result in a major alteration of existing land uses. However, such alterations will be in substantial conformance with the General Plan and have been addressed in the General Plan E.I.R. The land use adjustments that have been made (See figure 3.5 -2) relative to the General Plan were made based on a set of factors unique to the Etiwanda planning area. The central core area properties that were reduced in density, as compared to the General Plan, were so designated to achieve community character preservation goals and minimization of introduction of additional traffic in the core area as a result of development. In terms of land use, the impact of this decision centers on the economic implications that may be occur with decreased density, hence potential number of dwelling units. The 3-41 Y_' • RESOLUTION NO. * `' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -OIB AND FOR THE ETI'WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IS COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared to address the potential environmental effects of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and associated General Plan Amendment 83 -01B; and WHEREAS, the draft EIR has undergone the required public review period; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the Environmental Impact Report be certified as adequate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby certify the final Environmental Impact Report as adequate, based on the following findings: • 1. The final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and State and local EIR guidelines. 2. The final Environmental Impact Report contains appropriate measures to mitigate potential environmental impacts, and adequately addresses all reasonable environmental concerns generated by the project. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the following statement of overriding considerations is also adopted: "Future development proposals submitted under the Etiwanda Specific Plan and associated General Plan Amendment 83 -OIB have the potential for creating some significant environmental effects which cannot be fully mitigated. These effects, identified in the final EIR, are the unavoidable result of development taking place in a largely undeveloped community. However, the degree of these impacts is being mitigated to the fullest extent feasible through the measures incorporated into the EIR and the draft Specific Plan. The Etiwanda Specific Plan itself is a measure to mitigate potential adverse impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach. The draft Specific Plan contains provisions tailored to the community of Resolution No. Page 2 Etiwanda and is meant to replace existing City -wide zoning regulations that could cause damage to Etiwanda's unique qualities and community traits. Consequently, the adoption of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 83 -01B will result in potential environmental effects that are substantially less significant in scope and extent than those effects which would otherwise occur under General Plan and zoning regulations." PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19* AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Jon D. Mikeis, Mayor • • • ITEM 3: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01B BACKGROUND: This General Plan amendment is the result of the Etiwanda Specific Plan process, and is closely tied to the Etiwanda Plan. Approval of this amendment is necessary prior to the adoption of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Specific plans are designed to implement general plans, and as such must be consistent with the General Plan. The Etiwanda Specific Plan is based on the broad directional policies of the City's General Plan. As a result of the formulation of the Etiwanda Specific Plan it is necessary to modify the General Plan through this amendment. The reasons for the amendment are described below. The Et iwanda Specific Plan contains more detailed information. As an example, the broad land use category of 4-14 du's /ac has been refined into two categories: 4 -8 and 8 -14 du's /ac. The General Plan map should reflect these refinements to avoid confusion. o New information is now available. This includes specific commercial locations that are called for but not depicted in the current General Plan. The amendment should indicate the new information for consistency reasons. o Substantive revisions. A result of new and more detailed information • generated during the formulation and review of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; revisions are required for internal consistency. The proposed amendment affects changes in land use, circulation, and trails plans of the City's General Plan. The changes reflect revisions as approved by the Council. All items, detailed in the attached Resolution, have already been discussed by the City Council as separate issues. A public hearing and your approval of the amendment are required prior to the Specific Plan adoption. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council hold a public hearing on GPAA Oi. —Band consider approval of the attached Resolution. CJ • RESOLUTION NO. "r" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, as a result of the Etiwanda Specific Plan preparation and public review process, new or more detailed informatic .bout the Etiwanda planning area became available; and WHEREAS, this information made it apparent that modifications and /or refinements to the current General Plan circulation, land use, and trails maps should be considered; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended adoption of the proposed General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held duly advertised public hearings pursuant to Section 65351 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and certified the associated Environmental Impact Report as adequate. • HOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 83 -OIB consisting of the following changes: SECTION 1: LAND USE Commercial and Office Designations: The General Plan Land Use Map is amended in accordance with attached Figure 1 to include the following designations: General Plan Designation Location Neighborhood Commercial a. At the northwest corner of Etiwanda and Base Line. b. At the northwest corner, of East and Foothill c. At the southeast corner of 24th and East Commercial d. On west side of Cherry, north of I -15 e. At the northwest corner of East and Base Line. Resolution No. Page 2 • Office f. On the north side of Base Line, west of East. g. On north side of Foothill, east of I -15 Residential Designations The Land Use Map is amended in accordance with Figure 2, to include the following designations: Area Change North of Route 30 a. Change land use boundaries to reflect flood control and CALTRANS ownership - eliminate M (4 -14) designation adjacent to I- 15 /Rt. 30 interchange, lower density east of Cherry to VL (1 -2 du /ac) (See Figure 2). South of Route 30, b. Reduce density along and east of • North of I -15 Etiwanda Ave, VL P(R1R2 du /ac) on about 170 acres (See Figure 2). c. Increase density along Etiwanda and Base Line from L (2 -4 du /ac) to LM (4 -8 du /ac) on about 130 acres (See Figure 2). d. Increase density around I -15/ East Avenue and Base Line, from L (2 -4 du /ac) to LM (4 -8 du /ac) and M (4 -14 du /ac) on about 80 acres (See Figure 2). e. Reduce density west of I- 15 /Rt. 30 interchange from M (4 -14 du /ac) to L (2 -4 du /ac) on about 18 acres (See Figure 2), South of I -15 f. Modify portions of existing M (4 -14 du /ac) designation to LM (4 -8 du /ac) . (See Figure 2). g. Modify area south of Foothill to LM • (4 -8 du /ac) and M (4 -14 du /ac) per Figure 2. Resolution No. Page 3 E r'; SECTION 2: TRAILS The General Plan Master Plan of Trails is modified in accordance with Figure 3, and to include the following: a. New trail along East Avenue, between 24th Street and S.P.R.R. It. New east /west trail connecting_ Victoria Park Lane with Fontana at east city limits. c. Continuation of trail along East Etiwanda Creek to S.P.R.R. and beyond. SECTION 3: CIRCULATION The General Plan Circulation Plan is amended in accordance with attached Figure 4, to include the following modifications: 1. Addition of an east -west special design divided arterial in the area of 24th Street to connect Day Creek Boulevard with Cherry • Avenue and Route 15 in a smooth and efficient manner which will encourage traffic from the sphere of influence area to direct around the Etiwanda core area to gain access to destinations farther south. The alignment of this roadway is along a future street contemplated by County planners, MWD right -of -way and open areas. 2. Realignment of Summit Avenue east of East Avenue to continue its easterly direction for an additional one -half mile before turning north -east to intersect with future Day Creek Boulevard (24th Street, "umbrella loop "). This will provide better access to the property in the area which is heavily encumbered with flood control easements. 3. Reduction of Etiwanda Avenue from a secondary arterial to a collector (existing width) from Highland Avenue to Summit Avenue and an increase in classification from secondary arterial to major arterial between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard. This is in keeping with refinements made in traffic volume projections during the Etiwanda Plan process. The designation of Etiwanda Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Highland Avenue is proposed to remain the same. 4. Reduction of ?tiller Avenue east of Ftiwanda Avenue from secondary arterial to collector to reflect a reduction in projected traffic volumes. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. r'; 24 TF: _ / / / / /// it - =- - -� i I� 9 J:lb FOOTHIU ULIO ARROW HWY \� _ I/ d LEGEND ❑Neighborhood Commercial ■ Commercial = Office COMMERCIAL DESIGNATIONS fig- 1 24 T TMILIFA AVE_ m f C2 JL FOO�,, Ecvn ,pp.w HWY[YL2J 0 C v W. M-> r --e L I R1E. - YE. LEGEND 6! VL < 2 L 2 - 4DU's/ LM 4-8 M 4-14 FC Flood Control change to RESIDENTIAL fig. DESIGNATIONS 2 • SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST I i 1 i ME 11 11 . C u . rnnIIIINwIIIUIInII�wnnWOO rrrq�r O ° O rM4p4ii< ) o - Inrrrrrmm�mwwii - - °....coop 1111_1111. °0 1111.11. Co ° °Oqo °'? o p co p.0000000? o p a of ° ) O ^ p O Or O O J O OO q C O! tl O O O .1 0 O OI � c on°o.on 1111°110' 000n•.r.+ +�+��'4Aa�w' = —�.: o` i,&Y REGIONAL PARK p o° o a •y zl_: °o °oo.° •_../ . �oyu.J,000-�` r,.onavn..opo -..v ,: vor5 "6'✓Se"6tsb- 67a'ry�66Vmotr��\ oa3 >ooe -row o � o © � v p ��i (''� J I l j�" a w n� ..'.,, °o °4.0 pl.uA L6 ���¢OO•: a� a:_; COMMUNITY TRAILS .6sr78 ^tgUO¢OO O��T..S3R= ;�•,�OC3�•.s9.1:: ^.�S.fv� ^�: r. Q _ = CD Proposed ,UN.L�RRN,O o-omor,avoavo v +>o.vovvvv O'oAZrl t��m�.ccww +®1 O a c I ,.. = v.moouraov o•�o voo nvr:' -r of MASTER 'i Current PLAN OF TRAILS fig. 3 ................. ---- - ----------------- OADD DF:447E 7a Rr�MIV .44iK14r11Alv6E 7b CN,41146C TO ... ..... ......... . ... ....... MCULAMON PLAN Fig.4 PROPOSED R.O.W. LOCATION COLLECTOR - ____ -• SECONDARY - - __ - - - -_- MAJOR ARTERIAL ......... MAJOR DIVIDED .......... ARTERIAL • ITEM 4: ADOPTION OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN • 9 The Etiwanda Specific Plan is both a general guide and a specific regulatory document for the Etiwanda planning area. Part I of the Plan, the Policy and Conceptual Plan, contains policy guidelines and approval by Resolution is all that is needed. Part II of the Plan, the Regulatory Provisions, will for all practical purposes replace the current Zoning Ordinance for the Etiwanda Planning area. Consequently, adoption by Ordinance is required. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, as modified. The approving Resolution and Ordinance are attached for your consideration. 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga calls for the preparation of a specific plan for the Etiwanda area; and WHEREAS, a draft of the Specific Plan was prepared by the Advisory Committee and forwarded to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Draft Specific Plan, considered public comments, reviewed the environmental implications of the draft Plan and recommends approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan with modification to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65500 of the California Government Code to consider further public input; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolutions certifying the • adequacy of the associated Draft Environmental Impact Report and adopting General Plan Amendment 83 -016. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the Etiwanda Specific Plan is hereby adopted, based on the following findings: 1. The Etiwanda Specific Plan has been prepared in accordance with Section 65450 through 65553 of the Government Code. 2. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains regulatory provisions that are necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare of the people of Rancho Cucamonga, and required for the systematic implementation of the City's General Plan, as amended, in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. 3. The Etiwanda Specific Plan substantially mitigates the potential for adverse impacts that would likely occur as a result of development under the existing Zoning Ordinance. The Specific Plan contains detailed regulatory provisions tailored specifically to the Etiwanda area that are designed to replace current City -wide regulations that could not deal effectively with Etiwanda's unique qualities and problems. • ORDINANCE NO. * ,-v AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REGULATORY PROVISIONS SECTION OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP FOR THE ETIWANDA AREA ACCORDING TO THESE PROVISIONS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The Regulatory Provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan are hereby approved and adopted, based on the following findings: 1. The Etiwanda Specific Plan has been prepared in accordance with Section 65450 through 65553 of the Government Code. 2. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains regulatory provisions that are necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare of the people of Rancho Cucamonga, and required for the systematic • implementation of the City's General Plan, as amended, in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. 3. The Etiwanda Specific Plan substantially mitigates the potential for adverse impacts that would likely occur as a result of development under the existing Zoning Ordinance. The Specific Plan contains detailed regulatory provisions tailored specifically to the Etiwanda area that are designed to replace current city -wide regulations that could not deal effectively with Etiwanda's unique qualities and problems. SECTION 2: The City's official Zoning Map is hereby amended to contain an ESP designation on the real property described in Section 3, below. Further, the development of said property shall be regulated by the Regulatory Provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan text, and maps, except that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance and /or other applicable regulations shall continue to govern items not specifically addressed by these Reglllatory Provisions. E Ordinance No. Page 2 L-A SECTION 3: The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all real property described below: ' Etiwanda Specific Plan area - approximately 3000 acres within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, bounded on the north, northwest and east by current city limits, on the South by the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, and on the west by the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community; also including all properties located within 200' of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and 24th Street; and also including the area south of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue and north of Arrow Route, but excluding the area south of Miller Avenue and west of Etiwanda Avenue. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On tario�rnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. . AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor • • • 12 /'ITT I) /1P Tl STAFF REPORT DATE: May 4, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Rick Marks, Associate Planner 197 SUBJECT: SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT: DRAFT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ABSTRACT: This report contains a draft Development Agreement to be used in conjunction with senior citizen housing projects developed under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission and City Council have recently been involved in creating an overlay district containing development incentives designed to stimulate the production of affordable senior citizen oriented housing for low- and moderate - income senior citizens. One of the key City concerns has been the long -term problem of ensuring that all units developed under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District remain available and affordable to the intended occupants. Development Agreements provide a vehicle by which the City can meet this concern in a simple and legally enforceable manner. Draft Development Agreement: The attached Development Agreement has Teen drafted by the City Attorney and Planning staff in order to demonstrate to the City Council the basic contents of such an agreement. In preparing the draft agreement it was intended by staff that certain provisions would run uniform throughout all Development Agreements entered into by the City. Those sections of the draft Development Agreement especially pertinent to a particular project are indicated by "blanks" which would be filled in by the staff at the time an applicant applies for assistance from the City. Development Agreements will be processed along with projects and brought to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval. On April 13, 1983, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft general Development Agreement and approved it with two changes. RESOLUTION NO. ��- • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH HOUSING UNITS PRODUCED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has enacted Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02, creating a Senior Housing Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the City is concerned about protecting the long -term availability and affordability of units produced for low and moderate income senior citizens; and WHEREAS, Development Agreements as provided in the California Government Code Sections 65864- 65869.5 provide a means of protecting rental housing units produced under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District for low and moderate income senior citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the General Development Agreement developed by Staff meets the general concerns of the City; and WHEREAS, on a project -by- project basis the General Development • Agreement can be filled in by the City in such a way that all of the concerns of the City will be met. E NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the General Development Agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby orders that Development. Agreements be completed on a project -by- project basis and brought to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren '1. grass erman, Ci!.y �lercz bon D. Mikels, Nayor . H. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT Rick Marks, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Vice - chairman Stout opened the public hearing, There were no conmients, therefore the public hearing was closed, Vice - chairman Stout stated that he would suggest that paragraph 12 a under "Target Population" on page 4 have the words "the head of household" stricken so that it would read that either spouse would have to be fifty -five years or older, Jack Lam asked if the problem was with the term "head of household ". Commissioner Stout replied that the term "head of household" has both traditional and legal meanings and that if the husband was 53 and the wife 55, they should also be eligible. Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the target population wording is from HUD Section 8 language; however, he did not see a problem with rewording this section so that either spouse could be 55 or older. Vice - chairman Stout referred to the second paragraph on page 5 dealing with rent increases and asked if the notification requirement included the City. • Rick Marks replied that it did not. Vice - chairman Stout suggested that this be required because the City would more than likely receive complaints from tenants when rents are increased and would at least be well informed. 0 Mr. Hopson stated that there is an annual review process and the question is how intrusive the City should be in the operation conducted by the property owner. The argument was presented that if income levels increase in the County shifted every six months, it would be appropriate at that time to raise rents. Staff felt that it would be justifiable for the City to rely on the good faith effort of the property owner to adjust their rents accordingly, and that during the annual review the City would learn of all rent increases. Vice - chairman Stout stated that he was riot a rent control advocate, however, would prefer to be notified by the landlord that rents were being increased than to hear it from the residents. Further, that language should be included in paragraph 13 of page 4 to require that the City he notified of rent increases for the units for which a project was given some type of density bonus or fee waiver because the City has given them something and should see what it is getting in return. Further, that he was not interested in the market rate apartments, only those units occupied by senior citizens whether they are target population or not, Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he agreed with Vice- chairman Stout and felt • that it would be of benefit to the landlord if he notified the City of his intention to increase rents. There was further discussion on this topic with the decision being that this recommendation would be made to the City Council. Vice - chairman Stout referred to the termination and eviction requirements on page 7 and asked if they complied with California law. Mr. Hopson replied that "a ", "b ", and "c" comply with California law, however, "d" ties in with the target population income restrictions. He further explained that the final paragraph of section 18 is less restrictive than HOD Section 8 and more restrictive than California state law. Motion: Moved by Mc Niel, seconded by Juarez, unanimously carried to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of the General Development Agreement with the ommission of the "head of household" reference in Section 12 (a) and insertion of "either spouse ", and the requirement under paragraph 13 that the City as well as the tenants be formally notifed of rent increases. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: McNiel, Juarez, Stout NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Barker, Rempel - carried- . C, J / CITY OF RANCHO CCCANIONGA tic. a,o STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 1y TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Rick Marks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: FOR INFORMATION ONLY - NO ACTION REQUIRED ABSTRACT: This informational report contains a sample Development Agreement which is to be approved by the City Council in conjunction with senior citizen housing projects developed under the provisions of the Senior Overlay District. Attached also for Council review is a project cost analysis (pro forma) submitted by Calmark Development Corporation for their senior's Heritage Park Project. This cost analysis will be used in shaping a Development Agreement between the City and Calnark. BACKGROUND: On ?larch 2, 1983, the City Council reviewed Zoning Ordinance ,vnendment 83 -02 creating a Senior Housing Overlay District in the City. The Council did not take action on the Amendment and instructed staff to prepare supplemental information relative to the new Overlay District including a draft Development Agreement. Staff was further instructed to bring the supplemental information to the City Council on April 6, 1983 for its review and approval. Development Agreements - Points of Authority: The California Government Code (Sections 65864 - 65869.5) allows cities to enter into agreements with developers, the contents of which shall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Government Code further provides that a development agreement shall be enforceable by any part thereto. Relationship to Senior Housing Overlay District: One of the ley concerns that the City has regarding the Overlay -District is that of protecting the long -term availability of the units for the target population and insuring that rents charged are affordable to that population group, p ?velrpment Agreements, provide a vehicle by which the City ran make th^ production of affordable senior citizen oriented housing attractive to the private sector while protecting the long -term availability and affordability of the units produced as well as insuring JII compliance with ether duty requir+ments. 7,' Sampi^ eve •.:; �.nc .;greement April 6, 1983 Page 2 The Development Agreement, as drafted by staff and reviewed by the Council, will form the basis of future agreements entered into by the City and developers of senior housing units in the Senior Housing Overlay District. _ SamDie Develooment Agreement: The attached sample Development Agreement has been drafted by the City Attorney and Planning staff in order to demonstrate to the City Council the basic contents of such an agreement and to seek feedback from the Council. In preparing the sample agreemnt it was intended by staff that certain provisions would run uniform throughout all Development Agreements entered into by the City. Those sections of the sample Development Agreement especially pertinent to a particular project basis are indicated by "blanks" which would be filled in by the staff at the time an applicant applies for assistance from the City. Ca lmark Cc st Analysis (pro forma) for Heritage Park Project: Attached F Council rev te:r is the cost analysis and request for City assistance (development incentives) prepared by Calmark. This item is included in order to show the City Council how the cost analysis and request for assistance will be integrated with the proposed basic Development Agreement. City staff will use the cost analysis and request as a basis for negotiating with the project developer (in this case Calmark), drafting a Development Agreement and making recommendations to the City Council. It is anticipated that all Development Agreements entered into under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District will be shaped in this manner. Next Steos: Based on City Council direction, StSff DeveloPment Agreement and information submitted by Development Agreement for the proposed Heritage Park to the Council for its review and approval. NO ACTION REQUIRED Res?ectfylly.,-ubmitted, i .......... . Ritk c me: Cjty Manner RG:RPi:jr Attachment: Sample Covelonm^nt Agreement Cahparx Cost Analysis Calmark Request for Assistance 1 �•7 will use the sample Calmark to draft a Project and send it ot st • DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 198 , between ( "Property Owner ").and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ( "City "). RECITALS This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts: 1. Government Code section 65864- 65895.5 authorizes the City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. 2. Under section 65865, the City has adopted rules and regulations establishing procedures, requirements and administrative guidelines for consideration of development agreements. 3. Property owner has requested City to consider entering into a development agreement and proceedings have • been taken in accordance with City's rules and regulations. 4. City has found that the development agreement is consistent with the General Plan. 5. On 19,, City adopted approving the development agreement with Property Owner and said action was effective on , 19_ NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context othecwise iequires, the following terms shall have the following meaning: a. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. b. "Project" is the development approved by City, described further in pa_ :raph 8 hereinbelow. C. "Property Owner" is and includes all of Lttss nuccessoes in interest and assigns. d. "Real oroperty" is the real property referred to in paragraph 3 hereinbelow. 1 h� e. "Senior Housing Overlay District" is the • zoning category created by City Ordinance No. __ adopted 19 f. "Target population" is the primary group of occupants, residents and tenants occupying any and all units or apartments in the Project as further defined in the Senior Housing Overlay District. 2. Recitals. The recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement. 3. Description of Real Pronerty. The real property which is the subject of this Agreement is described more fully in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Interest of Property Owner. Property Owner repre- sents that it has full legal title to the real property, that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement, that there is no other person or entity which has any other interest in fee ownership to the real property, and that all other persons and entities who may hold legal or equitable • interests in the property agree to be and are bound by this Agreement. If there are any holders of deeds of trust on the real property which may be senior to the lien of this Development Agreement, the holders of such deeds of trust have assented to the terms of this Development Agreement in writing and agree to be bound by the provisions hereof. 5. Hinding Effect of. Agreement The burdens of this Agreement shall run with the real property and shall bind, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, the successors in interest and assigns of the parties to it. 5. Relationship of Parties It is understood that the contractual relationship between city and Property Owner is such that Property Owner is an independent contractor and is not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever. I. Citv`s Avoroval Proceedings for Project, on 19_, City approved _ On 19 , the City adopted a zoning designation of "Senior Housing overlay District" for the real property. The record of the applications by Property Owner, pro- ceedings before the Planning Commission and the Citv Council of City on file in the office of City and all of the files and records in these matters are incorporated herein in full • by this reference as though set forth in full. Property Owner proposes to construct _ units, rectea- tional and common area facilites, and _ parking spaces and other amenities on the subject property, all as are set forth more fully -in the site plan for Planned Development ( "Site Plan ") submitted by Property Owner and approved by City, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference. The Site Plan in- cludes various conditions of approval which are not changed, altered or modified by this Development Agreement unless specifically set forth herein. 8. Chances in Project. No change, modification, revision or alteration may be made in the site plan without review and approval by City. 9. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date set forth hereinabove, regardless of the date of execution hereof, and shall continue for _ years, subject to the annual review described in paragraph 15 hereinbelow. 10. Time for Construction. Property Owner agrees to begin construction of the Project within days • after the effective date of this Agreement and to diligently prosecute to completion the construction of the Project. It is anticipated that Property Owner will complete the Project within days after the date actual construction roper begins. Pty Owner shall make reports of the progress of construction in such detail and at such time as the City may reasonably request. 11. Restrictions on Rental Units. Except as set forth w hereinbelo, all tenants, occupants and residents of each and every apartment or unit in the Project shall meet the criteria set forth in paragraph 12(a) and (b) below. Property Owner shall restrict the availability and occupancy of all rental units or apartment units in the Project pri- marily to the Target Population as described more fully below. The "primary resident population" of tha Project Which must be reserved for and occupied by the Target Popu- lation shall be % of the units or apartments. Property owner shall use its best efforts to make the entire Project available to the Target Population. Apartments reserved for the primary resident population of the Target Population may not be rented, occupied, leased or subleased to tenants or occupants who are not in the Target Population without the City's prior written consent, except as set forth below. A person or persons not a member of the Target Population may occupy an apartment of those apartments reserved for the Target Population if they occupy the unit with a resident occupant who is within the Target Population and: 0 a. then, only in an emergency, and for so long as the state of emergency exists; b. - on a temporary basis, not to exceed three (3) months out of any calendar year (grandchildren, blood relatives); and C. medical support personnel or private nurses for resident occupants within the Target Population. 12. Target_ Population. Tenants, residents or occupants in the units reserved in accordance with paragraph 11 in the Project shall meet the following criteria: a. For tenants, residents, or occupants who are married to each other, either spouse shall be fifty -five (55) years of age or older. b. For individuals who are not married, each individual shall be fifty -five (55) years of age or older. C. In addition to the age restrictions set forth in subparagraphs a and b above, any individual or • married couple who wish to occupy or reside in the Project shall have and maintain an annual income from all sources equal to or less than eighty percent (809) of the median income for persons or couples within the County of San Bernardino as currently defined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. 13. Rents and Rent Adjustments. The Property Owner shall establish and maintain affordable base rents and utility allowances for all apartment units subject to the restrictic;;a of paragraph li i :he Pruject. For the pur- poses of this provision, rent shall include both the amount charged for occupancy of an apartment and any utility allowances if utilities are not separately metered. If utilities are separately metered, they will not be considered in the base rent. Rents for. apartments subject to the restrictions of paragraph 11 may not exceed amounts consistent with the following base rent formula: Rents charged will be affordable to individuals or couples earning equal to or less than eighty per- cent (903) of the current County of San Bernardino median income as • _, 0 owned by Project residents (total); (c) Listing of substantial physical defects in the Project including a description of any repair or maintenance work undertaken in the reporting year; (d) A description of maintenance of the Project including the condition of units, apartments, land- scaping, walkways, stairs, recreational areas, and so forth. City shall be allowed to conduct annual physical inspections of the Project as it shall deem necessary. The City shall further be allowed to conduct an annual survey of residents in the Project in order to assess their satisfac- tion with the Project. The survey may contain, but shall not necessarily be limited to, questions regarding management/ tenant relations, maintenance of the Project, design features, general attitude toward the Project, and so forth. 16. Additional Re P rtin Items. Prior to the execution hereof, per pro ownei shall submit to the City the following information: . a. An analysis of the cost of the Project including land cost, construction cost, financing cost, and so forth; b, Tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods that Property Owner shall use to advertise the availability of apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms that Property Owner intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to the Target Population. 17. Tenant Selection, Contracts and Rules and Reeula- tions. On receipts an application foe occupancy in the Project, Property Owner shall determine the eligibility of the occupant under the terms of this Development Agreement. Property Owner shall verify the information supplied by the applicant and shall verify the income of the applicant for the purpose of determining qualification. Property Owner may refuse to rent to an applicant if it determines that false information has been supplied on the application or, in the two years preceding the application, the applicant has been evicted by a court of law, Property Owner may not use source of income or marital status in determining eligibility. All. agreements for rental of units in the Project shall. be in writing. The proposed rental agreement or lease form shall be provided to City for its review and approval. Proposed rules of conduct and occupancy, if any are adopted by the Property Owner, shall be in writing. • Such proposed rules of conduct and occupancv and anv later revisions, additions, or modifications thereof shall be submitted to the City for its review and approval prior to use in the Project. Such rules of conduct and occupancy shall be given to each tenant prior to such tenants' occu- pancy. 18. Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy in an apartment in the Project may be terminated without the termination being deemed an eviction under the following circumstances: a. Death of the sole tenant of the unit; b. By the tenant at the expiration of a term of occupancy or otherwise, upon thirty (30) days' written notice; tenant; or C. By abandonment of the premises by the C1. By failure of tenant to maintain income eligibility pursuant to the provisions hereof, providing • that Property Owner gives tenant sixty (60) days' written notice of such termination. Any termination of a tenancy other than those listed in this subparagraph shall constitute an eviction. Property Owner shall only evict in compliance with the provisions of California law and then only for material non - compliance with the terms of the rental agreement, lease or rules and regulations of the Project. Property owner shall establish appeal and /or grievance procedures and rules and regulations for use for evictions in the Project, which shall be submit- ted to and approved by the City prior to the occupancy of any apartment in the Project. 19. Local Residencv. Preference shall be given where possible to applicants to the Project who have been resi- dents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This factor, however, shall not be given any priority over the other elements of tenant selection in paragraph 17 hereinabove. 20. Hazard Insurance. Property Owner shall keep the Project and allirorove ments thereon insured at all times against loss or damage by fire or other risks covered by a standard extended coverage endorsement and such other risks, perils or coverage as Property Owner may determine. Property Owner shall also advise tenants that such insurance • does not cover their personal property, and work with occu- 0 pants to obtain for them, if possible and if desired by the occupants, policies of insurance on the contents of apartments and personal property of the occupants thereof. During the term hereof, the Project shall be insured to its full insurable value. City shall have the right to review insurance coverage maintained by Property Owner or its successors and assigns and the power to require additional insurance to be carried of a kind and in amounts at the City's sole discretion so that the provisions of this paragraph are complied with. City's action or inaction hereunder shall not subject it to liability to any third persons or entities. 21. Maintenance Guaranty. In order to insure that maintenance of the Project is performed in accordance with the maintenance plan as outlined in the Senior Housing Overlay District administrative guidelines and in this De- velooment Agreement, Property Owner shall either establish a landscape maintenance district pursuant to State law and City ordinance, regulation and /or policy, or post a maintenance deposit or other legal security acceptahle to the City to be used by the City in the event that Property Owner shall fail to adequately maintain the Project or • breach this Development Agreement. 22. Specific Restrictions on Development of Real Prop- erty. The following specific restrictions shall also cover the use of the real property: a. Only residential uses of the real property are permitted in the Project. b. Maximum density of residential dwelling units in the Project shall never be greater than dwelling units per acre. C. buildings is: The maximum height for each of the proposed d. Maximum size for all of the buildings and the proposed square footage for each of the apartment types located therein is set forth more fully on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. e. Provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes are contained in the conditions for approval of Parcel Map Number and are incorporated herein by this reference. 23. Hold Harmless. Prooerty Owner agrees to and shall hold Cit„ its officers, agents, employees and representa- 25. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in Government Code sections 65868 et sec. This Development Agreement does not prevent City in subsequent actions applicable to the real property from applying new roles, regulations and policies which do not conflict with those rules, regulations and policies applicable to the property as set forth in paragraph 8 hereinabove. This Development Agreement does not prevent City from denying or condi- tionally approving any subsequent development project appli- cation on the basis of existing or new rules, regulations or policies. is • tives harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury including death and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Property Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which relate to the Project. Property Owner agrees to and shall defend City and its officers, agents, employees and representatives from actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Property owner's activities in connection with the Project. This hold harmless agreement applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the operations referred to in this Development Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Project. Property Owner further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and pay all costs and provide a defense for City in any action challenging the validity of this Develop- ment Agreement. 24. Affect of Development Agreement on Land Use Regu- lations. Rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the real property, the density of the real property, the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the real • property, are those rules, regulations and official policies in force at the time of execution of this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that City may grant Property Owner a dwelling unit density bonus, may reduce its requirements for on -site parking, may waive its requirement for covered on- site parking and may reduce and /or waive other fees as an incentive for Property Owner to construct the Project and for both parties to enter into this Development Agreement. Such incentives agreed on between the parties are set forth on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 25. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in Government Code sections 65868 et sec. This Development Agreement does not prevent City in subsequent actions applicable to the real property from applying new roles, regulations and policies which do not conflict with those rules, regulations and policies applicable to the property as set forth in paragraph 8 hereinabove. This Development Agreement does not prevent City from denying or condi- tionally approving any subsequent development project appli- cation on the basis of existing or new rules, regulations or policies. is r� L-A 26. Enforcement. This Agreement is enforceable by any party hereto notwithstanding a change in the applicable General or Specific Plan, zoning, subdivision or building regulations adopted, by City which alter or amend the rules, regulations, or policies governing permitted uses of the land, density, design, improvement and construction standards and specifications. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Property Owner, City shall give written notice to Property Owner by personal service on the representative of Property Owner (or its successor) at the Project, or by registered or certified mail addressed to Property Owner at the address stated in this Agreement, or to such other address as may have been designated by Property Owner, and if such violation is not corrected to the satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after the date such notice is given the City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agree- ment and, upon any such declaration of default, the City may bring any action necessary to enforce the obligations of Property Owner growing out of the operation of this Develop- ment Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for specific performance of the provisions of this Development Agreement, or for an injunction against any violation by • Property Owner of any provision of this Agreement, or for such other relief as may be appropriate, it being agreed by Property Owner that the injury to City arising from a default under any of the terms of this Development Agreement would be irreparable and that it would he extremely diffi- cult to ascertain the amount of compensation to City to afford adequate relief in light of the purposes and policies advanced and satisfied by approval of the Project and by this Development Agreement. 27. Event of Default. Property Owner is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: a. if a warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Property Owner to City is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made; b. if a finding and determination is made by the City following an annual review pursuant to paragraph 16 hercinabove upon the basis of substantial evidence that Property Owner has not complied in good faith with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement; C. breach by ? roperty Owner of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice described in paragraph 26 hereinabove.. 10 0 28. Proceedino Upon Default. City does not waive any claim of defect in pee ormance by Property owner if on periodic review City does not modify or terminate this Agreement. Non- performance by Property Owner shall not be excused because of a failure of any third person or entity. Adoption of a law or other governmental activity making performance by Property Owner unprofitable or more difficult or more expensive does not excuse the performance of the obligations to be taken by Property Owner under the terms of this Develpment Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in the City's regulations governing development agreements are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 29. Attornevs' Fees. In any proceedings arising for the enforcement of this Development Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover the costs and attorney fees incurred in the proceeding and such reasonable attorneys' . fees as may be determined by a Court in any legal action. 3o. Cumulative Remedies. The respective rights and remedies provided by this D'e veLOpment Agreement or by law or available in equity shall be cumulative and the exercise of any one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude or affect the exercise, at the same or at different times, of any other such rights or remedies for the same or different defaults or breaches or for the same or different failures to perform or observe any term or provision of this Agreement. 31. Partial Invalidity. If any provision of this Agreement shalrbeinvalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 32. Bindina Effect, This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof shall inure to, the respective parties hereto, their legal representatives, executives, adminstrators, successors and assigns. 33. Recordation. This Agreement shall , at the expense of Property owner, be recorded in the official records of • the County of San Bernardino in accordance with provisions of the Government Code. 11 cl • GI 34. Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. The provisons of this Development Agreement shall be liberally construed to effect its purpose as set forth herein and in the attachments hereto. Whenever the context so requires, the singular number includes the plural, the plural includes the singular, masculine gender includes the feminine and /or neuter and the neuter gender includes the masculine and /or feminine. The time limits set forth in this Agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the parties in accordance with the procedures for adoption of a development agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the day and year first above written regardless of the date of actual execution hereof. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROPERTY OWNER: BY: (Name) (T 1t e) BY: (Name) (Title) CITY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: BY: 55. On , 1993, before me the undersigned, a Notary PublTcin and for said County and State personally appeared and proved to me nn the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons who executed this instrument as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation existing and organized under the laws 12 ri • U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �ucnsto�, STAFF REPORT � x 19ii � DATE: May 4, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT -0 A - KANOKVECHAYANT - A request to amend the ueneral Plan LdnU Use 11a11 from Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue - APN 227- 091 -45. SUMMARY: The applicant has requested an amendment to the General Plan To increase the allowable density for approximately 15 acres located on the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of February 23, 1983, held a public hearing to consider such request and found that the request was not consistent with the current land use policies of the General Plan and therefore denied the amendment. Attached is the Planning Commission staff report which fully outlines the General Plan policies and goals which are applicable in this case. Also attached is a copy of the Commission Resolution listing the findings for denial and an excerpt of the Minutes for the meeting of February 23, 1983. The Planning Commission's decision to deny the request was based mainly on the fact that the increase in density would not provide the proper transition of residential density In this area as described in the General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies. The Planning Commission felt that the present designation of 4 -14 dwelling units per acre provided a proper transition from the lower density residential to the west to the higher density residential to the east. Other than the applicant, one other citizen spoke at the Planning Commission hearing indicating that he was opposed to the change since there was no immediate proposal for a project. IF 6 General Plan Amendment 83 -01 A /Kanokvechayant City Council Agenda April 6, 1983 Page 2 L RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of this request based upon the findings contained within their Resolution. Re spjctf ly yebmitted, Ri c k G ez City lanner RG:MV:jr Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - February 23, 1983 Planning Commission Resolution 83 -24 Planning Commission Minutes - February 23, 1983 • • t r7 i n U r1 L� 19 n tmv nn n n wrnvn PT Tr n nrtnMr n STAFF REPORT Q- DATE: February 23, 1983 F 19]T TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01A - KANOKVECHAYANT - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium Residential (4 -14 dwelling units /acre) to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN 227- 091 -45. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Requested Action: To change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject site from Medium density (4 -14 du /ac) to Medium -High density (14 -24 du /ac). B. Puroose: No specific purpose was reported by the applicant, C. Location: Northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester (Exhibit "A "). D. Size: 15.6 acres E. Existing Zonino: M -1 (Limited Manufacturing) F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped G. Existino Surrcunding North - lumber yard, zoned M -1 Land Use &_Zoninn South - single family homes, zoned R -1 East - vacant, zoned M -1 'vlest - vacant, zoned Planned Community (Victoria) rancral Plan a1 .J nt A3 -n1A /Kannsvorhavant \ Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 2 • H. General Plan Project Site - Medium Residential Des ion at ions: (4 -14 du /ac) North - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) West - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) I. Site Characteristics: Generally a flat site sloping gently in a southerly direction; no structures; some low weeds and grasses; curb and gutter existing along Rochester. II. ANALYSIS: General: The analysis of an amendment to the land use plan generally focuses upon surrounding land use compatibility, General Plan land use goals and policies and potential environmental impacts. As shown in Exhibit "A ", the subject property is 15.6 acres. However, this site is really part of a larger area which is • bounded on the north by Southern Pacific Railroad and on the east by Day Creek Wash. Any consideration of an amendment to the subject site should also include a review of this entire 21anning area which encompasses approximately 32 acres. This planning area is surrounded mainly by the planned communities of Victoria and Terra Vista. Exhibit "B" displays the land use designations of each planned community. Victoria designates a Low - Medium density (4 -8 du /ac) to the north and west. Terra Vista designates a Medium density (4 -14 du /ac) on the southwest corner of Rochester and Base Line. General Plan Land Use Goals & Policies: The General Plan describes the Medium density category as providing a wide range of living accommodations ranging from conventional single family units to mobile homes and townhouses. Building at the lower end of the range is appropriate adjacent to low and very low residential areas. Development at the higher end of the range is ,pore suitable along transit routes and major or secondary thoroughfares. The General Plan further states that the Medium density category is used to serve as a transition between low density areas to areas of higher density and areas of greater intensity which generate more traffic and noise. • i General Plan Amendment 83- 01A /Kanokvechayant Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 • Page 3 During the development of the General Plan, this planning area was subject to much discussion. Originally, the area was designated as Lbw- Medium (4 -8 du /ac). After further analysis by the Commission and Council, it was decided that the Medium range (4 -14 du /ac) would be more suitable for this area, as it would provide a transition from the lower densities in the planned communities west of this area and the existing Rochester tract to the east toward the higher densities and increased intensity between Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Parkway. The General Plan chacterizes the Medium -High range for areas of major community facilities and employment opportunities. This planning area should provide a transition from lower intensity uses to higher intensity uses while at the same time allow for development at the higher end of the range as a result of its location on a major thoroughfare. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff completed the environmental checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of the amendment. • As always, increased densities as a result of development will incrementally add to such things as increased traffic and increased dater runoff. However, these increases are not viewed as significant adverse impacts as these increases are within the capability of the projected street and flood control facilities. The increased density, if built at the highest density, would cause approximately 1,000 additional vehicle trips per day beyond the current General Plan level. Base Line will have an ultimate capacity of 43,000 trips per day and Rochester 22,000 trips per day. At the current land use levels, Base Line is currently projected to carry about 30,000 trips per day. Therefore, a 1,000 trip per day increase is riot impacting the capability of the street system to handle the increased density. Therefore, if the Commission chooses to recommend approval of this amendment, it is recommended that issuance of a Negative Declaration be recommended to the City Council. IIL FACTS FOR FIIIDINGS: Following are the firdings required to be made for approval of this amendment. A. The amendment does not conflict '.vi th the residential land use policies of the General Plan. General Plan Amendment 83- 01A /Kanokvechayant Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 4 • B. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use Element. C. The amendment would not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. D. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. This amendment would not be materially detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts as listed in "C" and "D" above. The Commission should examine and decide whether the amendment to a Medium -High density would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan. IV. CORRESPONEDNCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to property owners within 00 feet of the subject property. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public • hearing and receive all public input on this matter. If the Commission finds that the requested amendment is consistent with General Plan goals and policies, a recommendation of approval to the City Council would be appropriate. If these findings cannot be met to the Commission's satisfaction, a recommendation of denial to the City Council would be appropriate. Resdecrfully 3ybmitted, Rick G mez , - City P anner RG:MV:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Map Exhibit "B" - Planned Communty Designations Exhibit "C" - General Plan Designations Part 1, Initial Study Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial • • YFFv oFFr,E • P.C. I 'VICTCRIA' fI t —L `PiFT aI.NLGffi °' 1TEFRA VISTA' \ P.C. C C r GEMSIALIFUMMIOMUENT UFAM 4001 au4tnMA, CA asSEMCIR gaacM-1 MM 2Za- 091-45 V- 1 13���T \ : M- I r' 15.628 ACRES M.. _'f�Ft„iyR1 I Gr✓ �� �or�'_, I �'n°e"rct I i y7 I p „ 1' -300' 9 0 u o I 'IT clill NOAP I C cc E • > E • s , ti Figure 111 -1 LAND USE PLAN N _ �- I ' _ y ! __� RESIDENTIAL r' VERY LOW «oUs;AC li A f J LOW 2 4 OU', Ac r_7 LOW- MEDIUM a- BUU'VkC .:::3 MEDIUM 4 1 DU'VAC I O �� _!`_:`_ —.— I'.... I ® y •� ( C=I MEDIUM-HIGH 1424OU's AC I I - _ "'• ! �__t� !_ - I G=am HIGH 24 30 ou'+ac •! 1 _ -g` 1 i - D ! i i - 00 MASTER PLAN REQUIRED `• _ _` !— -ti _ -j,� I ,� i I sw.... I)P "' COMMERCIAL /OFFICE \•\ I i i i 1 _ _ it 'd l,I ®® __ p C7 COMMERCIAL fl; i. i I L 1` +�' + i •�• +.,, i t$7 �' x � - - -i COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL • I NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. '1 d . M�77 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL OFFICE C a9 I , �''.- J I '� �,"` ��- INDUSTRIAL � " • _ A 1- - -I INDUSTRIAL PARK C :.7 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 'l J EA-1 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/ •1• ++ { 3' l RAIL SERVED Ip," // / / //l HEAVY INDUSTRIAL dl OPEN SPACE 1 I HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL W. V -* - -!' I:_ "J OPEN SPACE x FLOOD CONTROL, UTILITY CORD. SPECIAL BOULEVARD PUB • .- _ _, - LC FACILITIES I x j EII a IE �i (EXISTING SCHOOLS r_ ,. — 1 f '" •• ••y jE III �,/� // "' �:� P PROPOSED SCHOOLS' PARKS'(EXISTWG PARKS SHOWN PI i • 1 CIVICiCOMMUNITY . 4 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F _ GENERAL PLAN r� .. ... .. u. e.. uw .nn.. ".....�.A.......n.:...:n. 1. a..H.,nuY..:r�a:�:u.ay... u:. 1 f RESOLUTION NO. 33 -24 A RESOLJTION OF THE PLANNING M',IMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPIO`1GA, CALIFORNIA DENYING GE';ERAL PLAN A,MEN0' ^ENT 83 -OIA TO AMEtIO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND ROCHESTER, APPROXIMATELY 32 ACRES, FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU/AC) TO MEDIUM -HIGH DENSITY (14 -24 OU /AC) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to consider said amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered both the pro and can issues of said amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission denies General Plan Amendment 83 -OIA based on the following findings: A. The amendment does not conform with the residential land use policies of the General Plan. B. The amendment does not promote the goals of the Land Use Element. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 232D DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1983. PLANNIN CO MISSION OF HE CITY OF RANCHO CU-V,lOAGA 1 Je+ roy: Yung! C� Airman �(I .' ATT�T: � Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAX, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonna, at a regular meetlna of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of February, 1933, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CCI "9I SSI07lE RS: MCNIEL, BARKER, REDMEL, STOUT, KIN3 NOES: C01 ?!'ISSI ONERS: NOME A3SE:1T: C0� "•U SSIO�iERS: NOME • • Excerpt from Planning Commission Minutes - February 23, 1983 s � • a ,E I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01A - KANOKVECHAYANT - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium Residential (4 -14 dwelling units /acre) to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN 227- 091 -45. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of January 26, 1983). Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the report to the Commission. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Dr. Raveewan Kanokvechayant, applicant, addressed the Commission thanking the City staff for helping her prepare the application a General Plan amendment from Medium Residential to Medium -High Residential. She stated that this density only appears in the planned communities areas and that she had been contacted by a developer who was interested in her property, but the property did not carry a high enough density for her to sell it. Also, she did not feel that a problem would be created in this amendment. Dr. Kanokvechayant stated that she objected to a staff report statement that indicated that the entire 36 acres needed to be considered in the amendment of this property • because her property is a different situation since her property is bounded by two major streets, Base Line and Rochester, which could carry more traffic and this traffic would not affect the Rochester tract. Don Baer, Etiwanda resident, addressed the Commission in opposition to the rezoning of this property. Mr. Baer stated that this property was the subject of lengthy debate during the General Plan hearings. Further, that he realized that densities would change and was not against change as long as there is a good plan; however, there doesn't seem to be a plan for this property as of now and that raising the density of the property without knowing what is going to be built there would be contrary to the planning the City has spent the last five years doing. Dr. Kanokvechayant addressed the Commission stating that she is not a developer or builder and cannot afford to bring a plan before the City. She further stated that she would make sure that a good plan for the property was submitted to the City. Also, that one plan she had been working on was similar to the project on Grove Avenue and 8th with a parking lot underneath; however, was not financially able to complete these plans. There were no further car:- ant:; and the public hearing was closed. COmmi0,'IOn'a' ' ". ^Yiel ;toted t'aat he is of the opinion that the density is at rvaximum now and it is out )f reneon to ro::One it a h-i,;her density. Chairman Sing stated th'ht r.hirs specific parcel of oroperty was discussed at length at the Goneral Plan hearim;s and I.hat everyone basically felt that Day Crcak was the more centrally located and more mass,-transit oriented roadway and therefore the higher j.+nsity should nn placed %long that major arterial. Further, that tnis piece of property his the highe.,t density Of any property ,^ i i west of Day Creek over to haven north of Base Line and up to the Foothill . Freeway and the reason it has the present density is because of its location with regard to Base Line and Rochester. It was felt that this piece of property was a good piece of property to have this higher density on. Further, to raise the density any higher would be against much of the discussion at the General Plan hearings and that good planning calls for the density that presently exists. Commissioner Rempel stated that the comment made by Mr. Baer is applicable in this case and that a plan really has to come first. There were no further comments and Chairman King called for the motion. Motion: Moved by M =Niel, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt Resolution 83 -24 to deny General Plan Amendment 83 -0IA. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Me Niel, Barker, Rempel, Stout, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None -carried- is • Cf 7 0 • E STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kral], Engineering Technician �O C,UCna o,,, y 1977 SUBJECT: Vacation of the Service Road located on the south side of Foothill Blvd. in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista Investment As a condition of approval for Tentative Parcel Map 6114 and Director Review 81 -38 for the development of an office complex (V.I.P. Professional Center) at the southwest corner of Ramona and Foothill Blvd., the developer has initiated the process to vacate the frontage road contiguous to the subject property. The tentative map was approved by the City Engineer on September 30, 1980 and the Director Review 81 -38 was approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on January 13, 1982. Parcel Map 6114 is on tonight's agenda for final approval. The frontage road along Foothill Blvd. exists only in this reach of the street within the City. It has been found that the frontage road does not provide for a good and safe traffic circulation, and it will be appropriate to vacate the road. Some portion of this frontage road will still remain which may be eliminated in the future by a City financed project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of the above described service road. Respectfully sub a fitted, ✓ '� W j LBf ,BK:jaa Attachments 14"m In N N Q� a ? OUTER HIGHWA m i (120'7 07 (1707 (12 w Q TR 41,T IN 1 3O15- Q l i{ �� I IN .)�J., t l 1.22 r 1127 IG`� ej FOOTHILL BOULEVARD VACATION No. 0 -24 0 I nb h N (Ii9.i1) • ��y II I I Z W � Q w I P • RESOLUTION NO. * T' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE (PARCEL MAP 6114) WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82 -195, passed on November 17, 1982, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m, on June 1, 1983, in the Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that a portion- the Frontage Road on the south side of Foothill Boulevard is • unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No.V -024 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof. FJ SECTION 2: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this reso ution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. 1 EXHIBIT "A" • LEGAL FOR 30 FOOT VACATION The southerly 30 feet of the frontage road shown as Foothill Boulevard, the outer highway south, lying adjacent to the north line of lots 122 through 125 according to Tract No. 3054 as filed in Book 54, page 14 & 15 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, State of California, lying westerly of the northerly prolongation of the westerly right -of -way line of Ramona Avenue being 55.00 feet wide, as shown on said map. Excepting therefrom a triangular shaped parcel of land bounded as follows: On the north by the north line of the southerly 30.00 feet of the Foothill Boulevard outer highway south, as mentioned hereinabove; on the east by the northerly prolongation of said westerly line of Ramona Avenue as shown on said map; and on the southwest by the arc of a curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 24.00 feet, said curve being tangent to both said north line of the north 30.00 feet and said west line of Ramona Avenue. • u `iX�uc4 i L4 Ct CC , . KX7 l • ORDINANCE NO. * AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.024A (b) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW FOR SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 61.024A (b) of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding subsection 61.024A (b)(8), to read as follows: (8) Second dwelling units: A second dwelling unit may be constructed, or attached to, a primary residence on a legal lot of record, containing an existing single family detached residence, subject to the following criteria: (a) A Conditional Use Permit application shall be required pursuant to Section 61.0219(0). • (b) The use of temporary /removable structures shall be limited to the sole occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60 years of age or over, related to the occupants of primary residence by blood, marriage, or adoption. Further, said structure shall be restricted to the area at the rear of the primary residence and adequately screened from public view from the street. (c) The unit is not for sale, but for rental purposes only, or use by a member of the immediate family. (d) The unit does not exceed 640 square feet. (e) The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main residence. (f) The unit shall provide parking and access pursuant to Section 61.0219 (b). (g) The unit construction shall conform to the setback and coverage requirements applicable to accessory buildings or additions to main residence in the zone designation in which the unit is located. Ordinance No. Page 2 • (h) The unit may require architectural review, pursuant to- Ordinance 89, as determined by the City Planner. (i) The applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Division written certification from the affected water and sewer district that adequate water and sewer facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed unit. For units using septic facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptability including all supportive information shall be submitted. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby finds that this Amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment and issues a Negative Declaration for this Amendment. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its • passage at least once in The Dail , a Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario 'To rnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, ,ty erk Jon D. Mike s, Mayor ;1� �J r 1 L J • • Is nrmv nc n nMPUn MW W)WIA STAFF REPORT V Q9 June 1, 1983 5 > 19 77 1 TO: Honorable Mayor h City Council FROM: Lauren W. Wasserman, City Man SUBJECT: Animal Control Services It is recommended that the City tract with the County of San Bernardino for animal control services for fiscal year 1983 -84. The proposed amount of the contract is equivalent to estimated revenues from licensing of animals in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. However, in the event these revenues are not realized, the City must subsidize this service. It is significant to note that a city subsidy will be required regardless of which agency contracts under the City to provide animal control services. In exchange for license revenues of approximately $84,700, the County agrees to provide basic animal control services required by law. Those services include: a. Enforcement of City ordinances pertaining to animals, including the issuance of citations when appropriate. b. Impounding of animals and return of licensed dogs whenever possible. c. Quarantine as prescribed by law. d. Investigation of nuisance complaints involving animals. e. Removal of dead animals from public rights -of -way. f. Investigation of reported dog bites. g. Establishment of a program for obtaining licenses by mail. h. Conducting of clinics for vaccination of dogs during the months of Nay, June, and July. i. Anti - rabies innoculation clinics. j. Development of a canvassing program to insure compliance with City animal licensing ordinances. k. Routine patrol approximately 56 hours per week. 1. Provision of a night answering service from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. Sunday through Saturday to offer limited special and emergency services to the public. __ Mayor 6 City Council June 1, 1983 Page 2 . As Council is aware, animal control services have been furnished by 'the Chaffey Humane Society since 1978. Since 1980, in the opinion of City staff, services have deteriorated and CHS management has not dealt effectively with the problem. The City receives frequent complaints about the Humane Society's inadequate facilities, poor customer /public relations, and treatment of animals. In January, 1983 contracting cities were issued ultimatums demanding immediate subsidies to improve CHS salaries and facilities or face termination of our contracts. In December, 1982, City staff representatives were told by the General Manager that CHS no longer wished to provide animal control services. That statement was later changed by the General Manager. During most of the past year, City representatives have attempted to work with the General Manager of the Humane Society in an effort to continue animal control services. At one point, cities agreed to contract with the California Conservation Corps to complete many of the improvements which are needed at the Chaffey Humane Society facilities. On May 2, the Manager of the CHS deemed those improvements unacceptable. Therefore, the improvements have been postponed until contract problems are resolved. Since that time, the Cities of Chino and Montclair have reluctantly left the Chaffey Humane Society and have contracted with the Pomona Valley Humane Society for animal control services. The changing of services to the County is not without potential problems. The City may be asked to subsidize the service in the event anticipated revenues • are not realized. On the other hand, the City will benefit from competent professional management, more courteous public relations from employees, and adequate kenneling facilities. We do not have those assurances if we continue to contract with CHS. It is significant to note that the County provided animal control services to our area prior to incorporation. The service levels at that time were adequate. However, it was determined at the time to be in the City's best interest to join with other cities in the West Valley to provide animal control services. qq ea.p, _16 Kennel Facilities RfU% Licensed animals which are picked up in Rancho Cucamonga will be kenneled at the offices of Dr. Stephen Clarkson, 121 East "E" Street, Ontario. This location may be more onven en an the prese —..orca i on iss ion Boulevard. Unlicensed animals will be housed at �et�'� the City of San Bernardino or the County of Riverside on an interim basis until the County animal shelter scheduled for construction in Devore is completed. It should be noted that at one time the County expressed an interest in expanding its current contract with the Chaffey Humane Society to provide for the kenneling at Chaffey of animals collected by the County on behalf of the Cities. However, the General Manager of the CHS stated that a $200,000 guarantee must be paid. That is another reason why the alternative kennel arrangements have been made. License Fees • Dog license fees charged by the Chaffey Humane Society are as follows: i7 Mayor 3 City Council June 1, 1983 Page 3 $15.00 unaltered dogs $ 7.50 Neutered or spayed dogs free Altered dogs owned by senior citizens (maximum of two per family) The County of San Bernardino fees are as follows: $15.00 Unaltered dogs $ 5.00 Altered dogs $25.00 Delinquent fees after August 1 1/2 price license after January 1 for pet owners who are new to the City While it would be desirable to continue a discount for senior citizens, that appears to be no longer possible. The City will be subsidizing animal control services from the General Fund for the first time. In addition, the County does not permit discount rates for any of its licenses. Therefore, it does not seem appropriate for all taxpayers to be asked to finance these subsidies. Recommendation: • It is recommended that the City contract with the County of San Bernardino in the amount of $84,700 beginning July 1, 1983. The actual City subsidy will be determined at the end of fiscal year 1983 -84. The $84,700 amount is based upon the estimated revenue to be received from dog licenses and related services during the fiscal year. It is significant to note that with any alternative, the City will face a subsidy from the General Fund for the first time for animal control services. However, it is our view that the County of San Bernardino is capable of providing an improved level of service. Also, the City will not be required to subsidize capital improvements, as is presently the case. The decision to recommend non - renewal of the contract with the Chaffey Humane Society was extremely difficult. However, until the management of the Humane Society expresses a willingness to improve operations, to remedy personnel problems, and to provide consistent professional leadership, it seems inappropriate to recommend extension of the contract. At some time in the future, perhaps with new management at the Humane Society, and City representation on the Board of Directors, it may again be advisable to return to a contract agreement with the Chaffey Humane Society. LMW:baa J PUBLIC HEALTH ,_ ,_ - -.,__• Michael S. Welsh . 611 001 $84,700.00 - -- --- ... - -- - -- - - - -- - . ... .... One .584,700.00_ T-il i; is ^:- :.C7 n^,:.j,, -:o in ;ne 5. •.� o' C::'''iorn',t ❑'. r7:: u_. .,, o.. ,. c....., - -a ...._ c n i} 0' c... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY 9320 BASELINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 ... S`J':'.v. .. ....a'b:al.i/:2 ^[S $ ^i /C ••• .. JJE :C 9J ".¢J..d^t 0. / /I: i. „_ _ .. .. r .r. ..... .r':: ' L: ........ - :fin!. fir. ... .. ..C. "v "):d r... n r. L: ✓5: .. .. r ._ . .. .i- rl a'1:1 J WHEREAS, the City is desirous of contracting with the County for the performance of specified service by County officers and employees, and • WHEREAS, Article I, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 1, Title 5, of the government Code authorizes the County to assume certain City functions, and WHEREAS, County Code Section 16.0213A(b) remains in full force and effect as a City ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. County shall provide through its Public Health Department, or such other agency as the Board of Supervisors may designate, animal control services normally provided by the Department to the unincorporated area of the County. Such services may include, but not be limited to, those services and functions perfgrmed under Chapter 1 and 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the County Code. 2. City shall compensate County the sum of $84,700 during 1983 -84 for services provided in this agreement. Such compensation shall constitute full payment, including reimbursement for supervision, clerical assistance, and other overhead costs. 3. The County hereby agrees to provide the following specific functions: a• Enforce all County ordinances pertaining to animals, including the issuing of citations as necessary for violations of said ordinances, IW., .n: .7 % 1 4 b. Impound all animals caught at large and provide for the return of all licensed coos w'nenever possible. C. Quarantine as prescribed by law all animals ,uspected to rabid. d. Investigate complaints of nuisance by animals upon reauest during routine patrol. e. Remove dead animals on the public right -of -way. f. Investigate reported doa bites. g. Provide a program whereby dog licenses may be issued by mail; clinics and during house -to -house canvassing; and send renewal notices by mail to owners of currently licensed dogs together with an application for renewal. h. Conduct clinics for the vaccination of dogs during the months of May, June, and July. i. Develop a plan and conduct a house -to -house canvass within the City for the purpose of ascertaining the number of unlicensed dogs and to license such dogs during the actual canvass. The County shall give notice of the requirements of existing ordinances and laws with respect to the licensing of such dogs and the obligation of the owner(s) or other responsible persons to apply for and obtain such licenses. A written citation will be issued at the time canvass to any person required to purchase a dog license who fails to purchase said license at the time of canvass. The County agrees during the canvassing period of August through April to attempt to make 100% total canvassing coverage of the entire City area. j. Assign officers to provide an average of fifty -six hours per seven day week, in the performance of the functions specified in Section a. through f. above. The number of hours per week include, but are not necessarily limited to, routine mobile patrols, investigative and rescue time, court _. appearances and impoundment of dangerous, wild, injured or loose animals. k. Provide a ni.ght mechanism to answer telephones from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. Sunday through Saturday and an Officer after regular hours to offer limited special and emergency service to the public in the field seven days a week. Special and emergency service includes, but is not limited to, responding to either a citizen's request or request from the Sheriff's of `ice to aid an injured animal(s), or to impound a dangerous, sick or injured animal, or attempt to locate a stray biting animal. The County Health Officer shall determine any other leve 140 service provided within the City. 1 //� Page 2 of 4 4. The County shall use C ounty Code Section. 16.0213A(b) in the administration of an animal license program in the absence of action by the City to adopt an ordinance revising fees for an animal license program. All revenues collected from City residents pursuant to County Code Section 16.0213A(b) (2) (A), (B) , and (C) shall be remitted to the City. At the option of the City, such revenue as provided for in this paragraph may be applied as a direct offset to reimburse County as provided for in paragraph 2. All other fees collected by County pursuant-to County Code Section 16.0213A(b) shall be retained by County. 5. All work performed by County shall be performed in County offices of at such locations as designated by the County Health Officer. This agreement shall be effective on July 1, 1983, and shall remain in effect through June 30, 1984, but shall automatically be extended beyond this date unless terminated or amended. Under such extension, the County shall be reimbursed based on the cost of providing services at such rates as determined by the County. This agreement may be terminated at any time with or without cause by City or by County on written notice given to the other at least sixty days before the date specified for such termination. 7. To facilitate the performance of functions as provided for in this agreement, it is hereby agreed that the County shall have full cooperation and assistance from the City, its officers, agents, and employees. • 8. For the purpose of performing said services in this agreement, County s611 furnish all necessary materials, supplies, and equipment. 9. Notwithstanding anything hereinabove stated, it is agreed that in all instances wherein special supplies, stationery, notices, forms, and the like must be issued in the name of the City, the same shall be supplied by said City at its own cost and expense. 10. All persons employed in the performance of such services and functions for the City shall be County employees; and no County employees shall have any City pension, civil service, or other status or right. 11. Notwithstanding "bhe foregoing, for the purpose of performing such services and functions and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance thereof where necessary, every County officer and employee engaged in the performance of any service hereunder shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of the City, where services are within the scope of this contract and arc purely municipal functions. 12, The City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages, or other compensation to any County officer or employee performing services hereunder for the City. Except as herein otherwise specified, the City shall not be liable for compensation or y Page 3 of 4 , o indemnity to anv Cquntv officer or employee for injury or sickness arising out�of his employment. 13. The City will indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from loss, costs, or expenses caused by the negligent wrongful acts or omissions of City officers, agents, and emplovees occurring in.the. performance of this contract to the extent that such liability is imposed on the County by the provisions of Government Code Section 895.2. 14. The County will indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from loss, costs, or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of County officers, agents, and employees occurring in the performance of this contract to the extent that such liability is imposed on the City by the provisions of Government Code, Section 895.2. Eccrd of Supery ;ssrs A TESTED: Clerb of V-e Euard of Supc; aors -- —. .1 '. ., r. T s I By —__- raurno•�:�esv Title, .____.._-- ________. — — r .- - - -- - -- - - - -pca • ]I._.. T.,,1, HUMANE Sociii -rr OF THE ,x CxxA1Fr3_Y COMMUNITY, INC. A NON.PROPIT ORGANIZATION. INCORPORATED JUNE 1994 1010 EAST MISSION BLVD. (Hwy. 60) ONTARIO, CALI FOHN IA ' 91]61 May 16, 1983 To: City Council, Rancho Cucamonga City Administration Staff We would like to bring to your attention some relevant figures for your consideration in placing your animal control services contract for the next fiscal year. The attached graph illustrates the discrepancies among actual revenues received by Chaffey Humane Society from animal control sources, the actual cost of performing these services, and the amount of service the Society has given to animal control . Income from strictly Humane Society sources is contrasted with the expenses of gaining that income and the amount of service given to humane activities. • It is clear. that the society has been subsidizing animal control in the cities. Our estimates from audited figures shows that since fiscal year 1979 -80 until the (projected) end of 1982 -83, Chaffey Humane Society has subsidized city animal control in the amount of $240,997. This would amount to approximately $86,397.40 Au1.f ,,,,,gnover the last four years for the city of Rancho Cucamonga, or $21,594.85 per year. The Chaffey Humane Society has attempted to hold the line in animal control costs despite an increased number of half- prices licenses and an astronomical rise in the rate of inflation . eta ed ca ital im rovements maintenance and repairs, plus un- �r alkt' ow wages have been the result. Collecting licenses by the "letter of Wow O,Ajes the law" resulted in Chaffey's having collected more licenses per capita than any �Eavrff,� Had state recognized California and acted upon the need dissatisfaction dy when first inevitable approached sP4000% the Society would have been able to fund needed repairs and equalize salaries several years ago. When approaching the cities, the Society has been continually requested to revise its subsidy figures. Re- calculations were furnished, based on the hope that a "phasing in" could be accomplished rather than catching up with several years of deficiency all at one time. We are aware that a bid is anticipated or has been received from San Bernardino County Animal Control. It should be noted that County animal control is NOT per- formed at cost for the County, and it is far from satisfactory despite the subsidy budgeted to it. We offered to (louse West End animals at Chaffey as a citizen ` te 20°1000 r � � convenience, but County calculated that they would be bringing in fewer animals ,u.r �au6 than Chaffey has in the past, and would not meet the cost figure we need to operate • a sheltering facilely. We understand their alternative is to house the dogs at San Bernardino City. This Society was agreeable to the program involving the CCC and City staff members d d )dt to equalize the deficit of the past several years, but it does not appear that any Fr ✓o consideration pfAOL&! be anobliga r given tion implementing the program which we understand to ��cCNAD year 1982- 83. Our proposed budget to the city of Rancho Cucamonga included a maximum subsidy of $11,476, considerably less than the average Chaffey has had to furnish for animal control from its own revenues each year. The CCC /staff program would have provided the necessary capital improvements neglected for so many years. Future increases would have been calculated realistically, and probably would be lower. Better than adequate service would have been continued without interruption. We respectfully request that Council and Staff study the entire picture before making a decision. Elizabeth D. Fryman General Manager E DF /jmf • 2. • r I� i CHAFFEY HUMANE SOCIETY / CHAFFEY CITIES ANIMAL CONTROL COMPARISON: Sources of income, expenses and services . o. m w a c 'r m r✓ C N 7 o r - o C O V N v C N f C1 (1 C1 O C o C �+ C V C U 11�TII1 C L ur Humane Animal Humane Animal Humane Animal Society / Control Society / Control Society / Control 1979 -80- 1980 -81 1981 -82 0 0 P U� m m n e w N G C G V 11 N �W N Humane Animal Society / Control 1982 -83 (at 3rd quarter) I � � j Humane Aninial Society / Control 1983 -84 (Projected ) +`sr 'DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH cooNrY OF SAN BERNARDINO 351 North Mt. View Avenue • San Bernardino, CA 92415 • 1141 3832941 y,^Y ' lOU E MAHONE V, MD.. D PH Id4ry u, 198' ,.is. 2;anuy riadmey License Inspector yL>cJ naselille ,"ic,io Cucw;)on„ l-a. ,Lear As. nacnriey Per our conversation of ".Lay Sra., uelow are estimated costs for animal control services for the City of Kanalo Cuc:vnonga for FY1982/83. I lave estil:ateu services at two levels of service specificaly ,Option I, at a level commensurate with tnat provided other contract cities and Option I1, at level wuere licensing revenue in pays for services to be pro - v14eU. uPI IO,N I Salaries /;5enefits • Alliral Control Officer (d. 3FTE) $55,160 Animal license Glecxer (. 33FtE) $4,866 Total $60,026 Venicle costs Mileage 53,59JX.24 = $14,013.60 Depreciation = $2,00J.00 Total $1u,013.60 iicensina Progrwii costs (tags,00stage) $3,542.00 AJIIL1 l 1nG,0wiu Pecs (2uu7X15 /:Liinal S40,000,00 Total USi)(2l la i lures >119. 581.00 'Lie aucive auaresses a level of service coamensurato Ivith tnat Provided other COOtl'JC, Clues 1,111 WI111COj)OrdtUU atCas in uie C, linty. These ani::tal control sen,lces 1:IC1u,.C: 24 uour services, seven P rays a ucek • ;., nn lo �t,4 r . Page 2 Cont. Enforcing laws and ordinances governing the licensing, • impounding, sale, shelter, and care of animals. Vehicle patrol of the city areas Educational programs to the public on issues related to animal care and control. Computerized Licensing System I estimate tnat approximately $84,700 in revenues would be received from Rancho Cucairouga residents in FY 82 83 if they purchase County dog licenses. Under the terms of our present contracts with other cities, the city may elect to reimourse us for total expenditures and receive licensing revenues, or apply same as a direct offset and pay the net cost. Uner either of these options, net cost to your city for animal control services would be approximat- ely $34,681 for FY 82/83, OPTION II This option addresses a level of service at cost, licensing revenues coming in would pay for services to be provided. Salaries /Benefits Animal Control Officer (2FTE) $39,384.00 Animal License Checker (. 33FTE) $4,866.00 • Total $44,250.00 Venicle Costs Mileage 3730X.24 = $8,953.00 ilepreciation = $1,300.00 Total $10,253.00 Licensing program costs (tags,postage) $3,542.00 Animal Impound Fees (1777X$15 /Animal) $26,655.00 Total Expenditures $84,700.00 Tnis level of service would be limited to the following: Venicle patrol of tiie city areas seven days a week, 8 hours a day. 24 noun emergency services Enforcing laws and ordinances governing the licensing, iry;ounding, sale, shelter, and care of animals. Computerized Licensing System �1 i Cont. Page 3 Again, estimation tluit approximately $84,700 in revenues would be received • from city residents in FY 82/83 if they purcliase county dog licenses. Under the terms of finis proposal, the city may elect to reimburse us for total expenaitures and receive licensing revenues, or apply same as the direct offset and pay the net cost. I have provided you with only two options but, there are others that we can discuss if you wish. I look forward to a response from you on these proposals in hopes that we can discuss this further. Please review the above and contact me as soon as possible at telephone number 383 -2243. Sincerely, Patrick Eng isn, Manager Animal Control Services 340 Mt. View San ilernaraino, Calif. 92415 PE /ew cc: Mike Welsh, Chief Adminstrative Services 't • • .f 0 • 9 1983 -84 CANVASSING SCHEDULE CITIES OF MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE CITY August 1 through September 9 Montclair September 12 through December 30 Ontario January through. April 30 Rancho Cucamonga The Canvassing Program will begin August 1, 1983 and end April 30, 1984. Four (4) Full -Time Animal License Checkers would be required to canvass these cities. IlP BAY Monday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Tnursday Friday Friday Monday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Friday Monday Tuesday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Monday Monday Tuesuay Tuesday SAN BERNARDIND COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1983 RABIES VACCINATION AND LICENSING CLINICS AREA Trona /Angus Red Mountain East Highlands South Fontana Bloomington Devore N. Rialto /Lytle Creek Lucerne Valley Oro Grande Mentone San Bernardino San Bernardino Wrightwood Phelan /Pinion Hills Apple Valley Newberry Springs Daggett Lake Arrowhead Barstow Big Bear Lake Hinkley Lenwood Slue Jay Crestline 1 N. SITE Argus Fire Station Owl's Garage Cram School Slover Special School Marygold Park Glen Helen Park Trapp School Fire Station Community Center Mentone School Newmark School Warm Springs School Community Center Serrano High School Fire Station Community Center Fire Station Fire Station Skyline North Park Meadow Pari Fire Hall Fire Station Picnic Area Fire Station • TIME 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. 12:30 - 1:30 p.m. 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. 5:00 - 6:30 P.M. 4:30 - 7:00 p.m. 3:00 - 7:00 p.m. 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. 5:00 - 6:30 p.m. 9:30 - 1:30 a.m. -p. 4:00 - 4:30 p.m. 4:30 - 6:30 p• 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. 8:30 - 11:00 a.m. 1:00 - 2:30 p.m. 10:00 - 12:30 a.m. -p. 3:00 - 6:00 p.m. 9:30 - 11:00 a.m. 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. 10:30 - 1:00 a.m. -o. 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. 12:00 - 3:30 p.m. 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. 1:00 - 3:30 p• 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. 1943 Rabies Vacc. and Lic. Clinics aP 2 DATE TIME DAY AREA May 25 Wednesday San Bernardino May 26 Thursaay Baker May 26 Thursday Yermo May, 27 Friaay Mt. Baldy May 27 Friaay San Antonio Heights May 31 Tuesaay Crestmore Village June 1 Wednesoay Morongo Valley June I Weanesuay Joshua Tree June 2 Tnursday Yucaipa J 3 Friaay Big Bear City y 9:30 - o Monday San Bernardino June 7 Tuesaay Yucca Valley June o Weanesday Grand Terrace June 9 Thursday Montclair /Ontario June 30 Friday Green Valley Lake June 10 Friday Running Springs June Id Monday Highland June 14 Tuesuay San bernardino June to weunesoay 29 -polms June 16 Tnursday San oernaraino June 17 Friudy nesperia J7ffl2J Monday Los Serranos /Chino hills June 21 Tuesday hignland �r SITE TIME Muscoy School 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. County Building 12:30 - 1:30 p.m. Norm Smith Park 3:30 - 5:30 P.M. Post Office 10:00 - 10:30 a.m. Park on Mountain Ave. 1:00 - 2:30 p.m. Crestmore School 4:30 - 6:00 p.m. Covington Park 9 :30 - 11:00 a.m. Park 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. County Library 9:00 - 12:00 a.m. 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. Big Bear City Park 9:30 - 1:00 a.m. -p. Victoria School 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. Community Center 2:00 - 6:00 p.m. Grand Terrace Flementary 5:00 - 7:30 p.m. Montclair /Ontario Center 5:00 - 8:00 p.m. Club House 10:00 - 10:30 a.m. Rim of the World Church 12:30 - 2:00 p.m. San Andreas High School 66:00 - 8:00 p.m. Warm Springs School 5:30 - 8:00 p.m. Luckey Park 10:00 - 11:30 a.m. 1:00 - 33:00 p.m. Del Vallejo Jr. High 5:00 - 7:30 p.m. Fire Station 9:00 - 12:00 a.m. 2:00 - 5:30 p.m. Glenmeaae Park 10:30 - 1:00 a.m. -p, 4:30 - 7:00 p.m. San Andreas High School 5:30 - 8:00 P.M. 19o3 Raoies Vacc. ana lic. Clinics Page 3 • DATE DAY AREA SITE TIME June 22 Wednesday Fontana Police Department 9:30 - 12:30 a.m. -p.r 2:30 - 5:30 p.m. June 23 Thursday San Bernardino Warm Springs School 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. • i • 'n n V •T END • iNNCIIO Cumiuigg8 ONTARIO hIONTCLhIR COUNTY 6icenses solo -- 7,781 9,535 3,536 iupula iou 2,863 t 56,100 92 100 23.500 94 nnn „rea aqua re rli les cstimdteu Dug Population L I Jug per 4 people) — License Fees: Regular: Altereu: Free: Fend] ty: DI __51750 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 r $ 7.5U $15.00 7.SU $ One t $ 5.00 onz to each household one to each house- Une to each over 65 if altered, hold over 65 if household over �Q- altered. 65 if altered. $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 =,pprchensiun Fee: 1st. Off. 2nd. Off. Board (per day) Vaccination s s :09s Vaccinated at Clinics $15.00 $18'00 $ 2.50 $ 1.50 566 $15.00 $18.00 $ 2.50 $ 7.50 887 $15.00 $18.00 $ 2.58 $7.50 409 $25.00 $25.00 $ 3.00 L_stioiated Canvassers 4 4 _290 a Lima tea CanvassinU Tick 120 Days _ 90 Dan _30 Uays 30 Day �..ellin9s __ 24,642 17.194 • • • BOUNDAR CES Nun 6cr Census Tract /Area Population N S L W 1 8.01 (uninc.) 22,602 VII Baseline /Highland ? Co. Line 20 (R.C.) 2 - 8.03 (uninc.) 25,175 Foothill Mission f5enson Co. Line 2, 3 (,%bnt.) 10 Writ.) 3 3 (Mont.) 1, 4, 5 (uninc.) 23,976 Mission Co. Line Bensell/EnClid Co. Line 4 18 (out.) 19 (uninc) 23,743 Mission Co. Line Euclid /(see map) Co. Line 5 10, 11, 14, 16, 17 26,404 4th I60 Euclid Benson (Ontario) 6 11 - 16 (Ont) 26,520 DO Mission Archibald Euclid 7 13, 21, 22 (Ont & RC) 24,902 Foothill DO Cherry Grove ( ?1 8 8.02, 20 (RC) 23,391 Highland Foothill Co. Line Grove( ?) /Anccibald • • • WEST ENO • LOCATIONS FOR LICE14SI14G DOGS Pi Ontario Health Office 325 East "C" Street Mon-Fri ..... 8:00 -4:00 Phone: 988 -1312 Chino Health Office 13260 Central Ave. Mon - Fri..... 8:00 -4:00 Phone: 627 -3649 Chaffey Humane Society 1010 East Mission Blvd. Mon - Fri..... 8:00 -4:30 Phone: 947 -3517 n � 1983 RABIES VACCINATION AND LICENSING CLINICS • CITIES OF MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA is DATE DAY AREA SITE /ADDRESS TIME June 24, 1983 Friday Montclair Civic Center 6:00 -8:00 p.m. June 2o, 19d3 Tuesday Rancho Cucamonga Lions Park 6:00 -8:00 p.m. June 30, 1983 Tnursday Ontario Colony Park 12:00 -3:00 p.m. July 6, 1983 Wednesday Ontario City Hall 6:00 -8:00 p. m.. July 7, 1983 Thursday Rancho Cucamonga Lions Park 6:00 -8:00 p.m. July 11, 1963 Monday Ontario Colony Park 6:00 -8:00 p.m. July 14, 19o3 Thursday Ontario Colony Park 6:00 -8:00 p.m. July 19, 1983 Tuesday Rancho Cucamonga Lions Park 6:00 -8:00 p.m. July 2u, 19o3 Weanesday Ontario Colony Park 12:00 -3:00 • p.m. July 2b, 19o3 Tuesday Untario City Hall 6:00 -8:00 p.m. July 27, 1983 Wednesday Rancho Cucamonga Lions Park 6-00 -8:00 p.m. Veterinarians: Veterinarians the lit. Balay aswigned to the clinics Veterinary Medical will be coordinated Association. through Advertising: 1. (120) Vaccination 8 Licensing strategic areas throughout Montclair, clinic posters will be posted in Ontario, and Rancho Cucamonga. 2. 20,000 pamphletts will be distributed Montclair, Ontario and Rancho throughout the Cucamonga. cities of 3. Four Public The P.S.A. Cost of License Service Announcements for each city will be released. will provide information such as: Clinic Dates and Locations, and Licensing Regulations. is May 2, 1083 o: tim e onnor. n..ar o- Randy Johnsen, Montclair From: Betty Fryman, Chaffey Humane Re: Animal Control, Fiscal 183 -184 !Q After reviewing the reductions in existing animal control services that would be necessary in an "at cost" service to the cities for the next fiscal year, it was moved, seconded and passed unanimously by the Board of Directors or. April 28 that we "inform the administrators of Ontario and Montclair that we (the Board of Directors) are unwilling to provide animal control services using only license and impound fees because there is no re- lationship between income generated from these sources and the actual cost of providing adequate • animal control services. we feel that substandard services would generate a great deal_ of criticism of the Humane Society." Further, it was the Board's consensus that the CCC program is of ar. accent ab le com_nr omise, they felt it was a one -time "face li anc t.e re is no m committment that we won't be in the same P's i.tior, three to five years from now, looking for another "face lift." As I told Randy last Friday, I will prepare a tentative budget for services at the current level. I have delayed firming up such a budget pending review of a "new" urocess for collecting additional license revenue from violations issued by our canvassers. Cle arc adapting a method which ether agencies have Sound to be succeosfu'_. I should have verificati on of whether this will be cos. - effective in the next few days. If it is, the amount of subsidy sho.ild be reduced. Meantime, any problems with our being able to provide licenses on June lrt co'.11d be solved by extending the "grace" period into August to compensate for a delay. u emngency -9e! Clinic of -?mow CV.tldj, S, 6960 TENDON AVL MONTC"IR. CA. 61763 T..... 961.1OD1 • .ebru ry 3, 1983 9ancho uc-;mon, City Council 9320 Baseline o d "n . ncho Cue "non,;. , Califori,. 91730 Dear ; -uncil ..embers: ,.e would like to brin o your attention•_he failure of he Humane Socie y of he Chaffey Community, ?n, to ob in energency medical care for injured anin;.ls from 10.00 p... to 8:00 a.a. on weekdays ,nd weekends. he 3uergency Clinic of Pomona 'Valley, Inc. at 8980 Benson ,Lvenue, ..ontclair is the only facili,y than, rsovides emergency Lninal medi-al care in the '. :cst Valley. Cur records show th=..t zero anisals have been brou ^ht in for emergency trey Lnent nights and weekends for the pas. 13 months by he Chaffey Humane Society. During the same time we created 176 emergencies for he ibmona Talley Humane SocieLy. Almost daily our , :linic „etz calls £rein concerned ;;ood samariwns about injured ani. als. • .hey call the 2olice Dernrtment and are :old to call the Humano Society. he C::affey Hu ne Society does not answer. These animals are ',hen brow, ^,h. in for emergency care and the Clinic has absorbed those cos.s. S ate law requires that licensi:g a;encies (or their contractors) secure emergency medical care for wnimals that are injured on the public scree -s. -.his huaune practice is not being carried ou .. pie ur a you ..o Lnveztira6C why the .haffey Humane Society is not providing his service, A... is la 10 l Sincerely yours, A. W, ,ac.arthy, X President, Bard of nirectcrs U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA o C�.CAMO,yc • MEMORANDUM, January 31, 1983 �!Iw'� CI F" U. 1977 —' FTO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Humane Society Problem. The attached letter was sent to the Humane Society as requested late last week. All the letter will do is to give us until March 1, 1983 to resolve the problem or to make arrangements with the County to handle animal control services. We have received a proposal from the County which must be updated to reflect current salary figures. The proposal provides two options: (1) which is at a level communsurate with services provided to other contract cities, and (2) which I think is more viable provides For services which are at the same level as revenue received. Option 2 is acceptable, as I am sure • you will agree. We will have to update the cost, however, and therefore, a small subsidy may be necessary. We are not certain of that however at this stage. It appears that our negotiations with the Chaffey Humane Society are nearing an end. While we have provided options such as using the California Conservation Corp. to handle much of the capital improvement costs, the real issue is the pr000sed 37!x% salary increase for current employees of the society. The five month cost for that increase would be approximately $11,000 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; $18,000 for Ontario; and $6,000 for Montclair. That is still an option if we cannot work out anything else. There is an even more important question to be resolved and that is whether or not the Chaffey Humane Society can withhold services for which they have Already been paid. Since most dog license revenues are received during the first two months of the renewal period, it seems logical that Chaffey would be required to refund the prorata share for services not yet provided if they cancel our contract. Bob Dougherty has indicated to the City of Ontario that the area is still open to question and further discussion. Tile purpose of this memo is merely to indicate that we have responded to the Humane Society, and we have indicated that we intend to work toward a resolu- tion to the problems. HOxrover, we are also making contingent plans to work with the Comity beginning next year. The County has also agreed if necessary to provide emergency services to Rancho Cucamonga; that would include animal pick up on an interim basis with the City responsible for reimbursing the County for miler,e and direct costs. In other words, if Chaffev cancels the contract, the city will still have at least a minimum level of animal control services. At this ,tage we are still trying to avoid the newspaper confrontation. That is why there is nothing scheduled for the council agenda this Wednesday. LMW:baa cc: Harry Empey ��� CD Ci11 ' MA I: O'.'.: iIC, .n ElF-11NIA :11, R. E 605 ElUNGADOD N.'. :ERl K AREE HO':ER r BRIGGS FAME :l. :, D STRU- aEECHE =. " DUN C—;ll Y.", January 31, 1983 A4EA CODE 714 ..19F Mr. Charles Cox, President Humane Society of the Chaffey Community, Inc. 1010 East Mission Boulevard Ontario, CA 91761 Dear Mr. Cox: ROGER 0, MUGHANKS Clry M'.' DEEORIS E. ARIMURN Cvy Cl.n IFNIETH N KEEVIy Cm uwr At your request, this is a letter reaffirming the intent of the cities of Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario to continue to work to solve fundin� problems for animal control services with the Humane Society of the Chaffey Community. We are somewhat dismayed that you have taken an ultimatum approach to nego- tiations. At our January II meeting at the Ontario City Hall, we were told that we had until March 1, 1983 to resolve our contract differences. We are particularly concerned at this most recent turn of events in view of Roger Hughbanks' discussion with Betty Fryman for construction of capital improvements at Chaffey Humane using California Conservation Corp labor. The use of this qualified free labor would address the stated need for capital improvements at substantially reduced cost to all of us. As of this date, we have had no further contact from Ms. Fryman who was to respond to Mr. Hughbanks with a breakdown of the labor and material costs of the neces- sary inprovcments. We look forward to a more cooperative effort. S':.co re Iy,, / ROGER D. Hl1GHBANKS, City Manager City of Ontario G. MICHAEL MILHISER, City Administrator City �WASSERMAN, tcllai ))r C'f/ttsUiLn�-✓ 11R City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga I cc: Chaffey Humane Society Board of Di roc tors E Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga HUNIANF SOCIETY OF THE INC. _j CHAFF£Y CO�'_�SliP7ITY. 1 w voM.nnon,• onewvrswnov, i vconno..Teo Iuvc lung 1010 EAST MISSION BLVD. IHw,. 601 ONTARIO. CALI FORNIA 91)61 January 28th, 1983 TO: City Managers, Assistant Managers, Mayors of Ontario, Montclair and Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Betty Fryman, General Manager Re: Animal Control services. The Board of Directors of the Humane Society of the Chaffey Community has in- structed me to convey the following message to you as a result of their deliberations: We require a written expression of good faith by January 31, 1983 from the cities to solve the contract and funding problem for animal control, or, as we advised in December, we will discontinue providing • animal control services as of February 1, 1983. If the Society receives a firm, constructive committment from the cities by January33, 1983 we are willing to provide services and to continue negotiations until February 15, 1983. 'Failure to negotiate a satis- factory agreement tr by Feuary 15, 1983 , will result in our withdrawal from anima br I control S7 This is a confirmation of my telephone conversation with the following individual in your city: TIME: N CITY: INDIVIDUAL: /,t'6 64'- " '9 9 , 0 • Ontario flumane SO(_de � may quit animal "con tg of �_.. fly JAMES SPFF.tfT - ' Sun Sloe WI.W _. ONTARIO- _Faced aith_- It inland ____i�.q mounting Problems and no way to - pay for ibelr correction. the Hu- - _ West Valley edition , mane Society of the Chaffey Coin. — - munittes may get out of the am- mal control business Jan. 31., its general manager said.. - , While the society has been able to weatber criticism from national • organizations and a walkout by four of its employees, a fiscal crunch is bringing it to a crisis ,point, said Betty. Fryman, general manager of the society's animal shelter in Ontario. .. A report from an investigator for the Humane Society of the United States was extremely crit. 'ical of conditions Pt the shelter, which servcs Ontario, MmAchur and Rancho Cucamonga,, As a result of :he report, the American humane Society sus upended its affiliation with Chaf- fey... ... Attention was focused on the sxiety last week when four em- p1mern; walked out, complaining they could no longer work in the "harrihie" conditions they said existed in the shelter's euthanasia room.- . - �Fnie crunch has been rreattd, ryroan and most of the society's 'hoard of duertors bNieve, b% the lark of funding from the cities it ser,c • It appears to be clean and the animal do not appear to be me, treated. There are signs of oven crowdmg, however. Some kennels contained five small dogs, which are too many, other shelter opera. torsmkL . The problems are not enough to cause concern to the San Ber- nardino County health Depart ment. Dr. Otto Stain, a count' vet erinatian, said he visited the shelter Dec. 9 and fluid no viola. Tinos or mistreatment of animals, But Stain. Sakach and even Fryman and the• hnerd aprvo that Borne things have to change at the shelter if it is to stay in hu,mC.w. Same kennels all poorly eCnb lati'd, as is the rulhwisa coma. .'d uch of elm stirh rr a .vttll made up of Ili, soot and cinder block structures used when Ito fanli was a chicken breeding ranch, Fn a,a n said. Such milermis ahwrh liquids unb•ss propert paimerl. unhealthful coudnions• Sakach aid. Euthanasia rgni)mtrat and U r c hniques are unsaf C. Sakarh said. The enipioe,rs who ualkcd u L1. a reed. Since the uall.out a non porous '001-11 "tic has been added for the basic sodmm laothoharbnnl inpr Noels heat arc the 11,1 riard I ,tuna, , r'Ir „lid - the shelter also has disconti. nued the use of chloroform, which Sakach warned could cause liver damage to employees when coed as it is at Charley. These changes and others re- solved sumo of the complaints lo:!drd be the four employees who walked out, and the hoard has tak on them hack on probation. But nmue more fu ndawrntal probb Ins re,n.ain We should be o o. -almg at $i'v NLU70 a yaar, and that would be cheap;' said Fgman. "But our an took over as It also included een Tittle for employees' raises. with the result that wages paid by Chaffey are 37.5 percent h +'per than the no lkmal average for animal control worker s. she said. That in turn has Caused a larg er than usual lurnn.cr in quay ifed employees. Fr: man said. To branr the sail her structures up to oplunum oia,"ling condi lion will cost F100.IX0. Fryman said. Just to bnng them in the minimum level required by the national associations will take $150 CM.sbes-id . "Me need more money," Fry- taint mid. "We can't keep on rater. -ling without it" interviews with shelter man spurs from Pomona Valley He urine Society to the San Bernardi no City Animal Control Department showed that all other agencies in the area are asking for gcncral revenue monies above what thev collect in fees. In Fontana, animal control u{+ orations were allocated S` .wo in the city budget, said Fontana pie Two It Sam Scott Revenues will To, It, Ihan r2o.000 from licensing and onpaunit fees. Srotl said San Bernardino shelter roam ager Paul Turner said his agency etas shown a lilt loss for the last six years, hilt prohably will gain a profit this tear through shrller contracts with six olhor cities. And Pomona Valley, in a ram tract snuabo.i siniiar to ('hat. fry's• r(ll, %is nonce than TIOnfXK) in general revenue funds from thefiveeitk, it,crv'rs. - One of those cihe:s is ('boo, which derilast M1!dreh n would rather lisp tI3 Fi3,(rtU to Pnumna than tlP ern to ['h alley, 4lyman said ' " Fhere are only nine cities in the nation that do not supplement animal control casts with general fund revenues," Frs'man said. .'.And we have three of them." • Chiffey, they say, is forced to exist on dog license fees, impound - fee, and on occasional contribu- tions. • While it was impossible to Prove Pryman's figures nation- wide, The Sun found that no other animal control agency in San Per nardino County depends solely on such fees to support its activities. Contradictions and confusion abound in the controversy Bur rounding Chaffey's animal Control activities and few agree on what is to he done. Eric Sakach• a field in, c,! ga Tor for the humane Society of the United Slates, inspected the shah ter on M1lusIon Boulevard on Jan. 22 and sent the board a four page letter detailing its problems and deficiencies. Cnaffey's shelter was not the worst he had ever visited by any means, Sakach snit in a recent IeJephnne mtenncu'. Put cnrdi tons are had enough that he sag gated the society .should get out of the animal control business if it cannot find a way to improve them. A visit to the shelter reveals • feu p: obb•ics to thrlayntan.. It appears to be clean and the animal do not appear to be me, treated. There are signs of oven crowdmg, however. Some kennels contained five small dogs, which are too many, other shelter opera. torsmkL . The problems are not enough to cause concern to the San Ber- nardino County health Depart ment. Dr. Otto Stain, a count' vet erinatian, said he visited the shelter Dec. 9 and fluid no viola. Tinos or mistreatment of animals, But Stain. Sakach and even Fryman and the• hnerd aprvo that Borne things have to change at the shelter if it is to stay in hu,mC.w. Same kennels all poorly eCnb lati'd, as is the rulhwisa coma. .'d uch of elm stirh rr a .vttll made up of Ili, soot and cinder block structures used when Ito fanli was a chicken breeding ranch, Fn a,a n said. Such milermis ahwrh liquids unb•ss propert paimerl. unhealthful coudnions• Sakach aid. Euthanasia rgni)mtrat and U r c hniques are unsaf C. Sakarh said. The enipioe,rs who ualkcd u L1. a reed. Since the uall.out a non porous '001-11 "tic has been added for the basic sodmm laothoharbnnl inpr Noels heat arc the 11,1 riard I ,tuna, , r'Ir „lid - the shelter also has disconti. nued the use of chloroform, which Sakach warned could cause liver damage to employees when coed as it is at Charley. These changes and others re- solved sumo of the complaints lo:!drd be the four employees who walked out, and the hoard has tak on them hack on probation. But nmue more fu ndawrntal probb Ins re,n.ain We should be o o. -almg at $i'v NLU70 a yaar, and that would be cheap;' said Fgman. "But our an took over as It also included een Tittle for employees' raises. with the result that wages paid by Chaffey are 37.5 percent h +'per than the no lkmal average for animal control worker s. she said. That in turn has Caused a larg er than usual lurnn.cr in quay ifed employees. Fr: man said. To branr the sail her structures up to oplunum oia,"ling condi lion will cost F100.IX0. Fryman said. Just to bnng them in the minimum level required by the national associations will take $150 CM.sbes-id . "Me need more money," Fry- taint mid. "We can't keep on rater. -ling without it" interviews with shelter man spurs from Pomona Valley He urine Society to the San Bernardi no City Animal Control Department showed that all other agencies in the area are asking for gcncral revenue monies above what thev collect in fees. In Fontana, animal control u{+ orations were allocated S` .wo in the city budget, said Fontana pie Two It Sam Scott Revenues will To, It, Ihan r2o.000 from licensing and onpaunit fees. Srotl said San Bernardino shelter roam ager Paul Turner said his agency etas shown a lilt loss for the last six years, hilt prohably will gain a profit this tear through shrller contracts with six olhor cities. And Pomona Valley, in a ram tract snuabo.i siniiar to ('hat. fry's• r(ll, %is nonce than TIOnfXK) in general revenue funds from thefiveeitk, it,crv'rs. - One of those cihe:s is ('boo, which derilast M1!dreh n would rather lisp tI3 Fi3,(rtU to Pnumna than tlP ern to ['h alley, 4lyman said 0 Chino City Council members told her that if they had to pay extra for animal control they would rattier pay an agency that had solved its problems, she said. The other three cities have vet ' to decide if the, will pay Chaffey additional funds. All three have asked that the society provide detailed reports of its problems and finances before a decision can be made, officials said. "They told us they hate a prob. lem but we haven't seen anything to verify it yet." said Ontario City Manager Roger flughbanks ''his is the first time they've asked for any more," be said.' We have to be sure the, have esplor. ed even possible means of raising funds 1SSIdes getting a suh•idy from the guvernment.' One suggestion that causes • Fryman to bristle is that the socie ty sell part of it, properlS, which includes a large empty field next to the shelter. "The board is against selling our land," Fryman said flatly. "Why should we have to ?" Fryman said she will meet in January with officials and city 'Ve don't have to be in animal council members from all thrr'e control;' Fr) man said "The board cities, is prrfectly willing to go tact to She and the 1 .vr! n ltrn cl C c• Litt t of tl nl b "ing a burnane swjci ' If we m:d "'I.L91 huynoss if the (en cant no normal conlrol right, we r.mt .�mcunnl n•�n siv. A"111 do n at all" • 0 F- 1 L _J 11 nrTV nc n n when 0 TO n nnnXTn n STAFF REPORT 1977 DATE: June 1, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL ABSTRACT: This report presents recommendations on revisions to the draft Regional Housing Allocation Model (RHAM) which is being considered for public input prior to its adoption by SCAG. BACKGROUND: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has completea a draft Regional Housing Allocation Model (RHAM) which is used to define five -year housing needs of communities in the SCAG region. The purpose of the RHAM is to establish housing goals for each community which will then become incorporated into a city's housing element. Estimates contained within the RHAM are based upon the growth projections which are adopted by SCAG and incorporated into the SCAG '82 Growth Forecast. Those growth projections are shown on Graph 1 contained within this report. SCAG has estimated the City's population will increase to 97,000 during the next five years (the term of the RHAM housing needs) and to reach buildout of 140,000 by the year 2000. These growth projections were based upon data input three years old and are actually considerably higher than currently estimated. The City, through the adoption of the Housing Mortgage Bond Issue, has prepared a market demand study to estimate projected housing needs for the next ten years. These estimates show a much lower growth rate than contained within the SCAG '82 and RHAM growth expectations. This study is based upon market area demand, employment opportunity, and commuting pattern. All three of these variables are necessary in order to establish a viable alternative to those estimates prepared by SCAG staff. A1b1LYSIS: The growth expections established by SCAG projected the RSA 28 area, and specifically Rancho Cucamonga, to receive considerable amount of growth during the early years. These estimates are unrealistic and if required of the City would set housing goals which are much high., rho, .an .., •.ably be .,ti .cd - 1 „u Revisions to Regional Housing Allocation Model City Council Agenda June 1, 1983 Page 2 • In addition to the accelerated growth curve, SCAG has incorporated a much higher population buildout total for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Our own population projections shod a lower buildout total within the incorporated area. Their calculations were based upon those provided in the study prepared the William C. Lawrence Company (W.C.L.C.) during the early discussions of SCAG '82 several years ago. The population estimates of the W.C.L.C. study were based upon population projections contained within the entire City sphere of influence, including both the incorporated and unincorporated areas. However, the SCAG 182 estimates for Rancho Cucamonga are only for the incorporated area. In summary, the SCAG estimates for Rancho Cucamonga should be revised in the areas of (1) lower rate of growth between 1983 and the year 2000; and, (2) a reduction in the buildout total for the City of Rancho Cucamonga based upon population totals contained within the existing incorporated boundaries. In order for the City to request revisions of population totals contained within the SCAG '82 or the RHAM, they are required to use sound growth forecast methods which are based on an empirical analysis • of growth characteristics. The City, through their Mortgage Bond Issue, completed a growth forecast study which considered market demands for housing, employment opportunities, and commuting patterns to arrive at a growth expectation for the during the next ten years. The study estimated an approximate 8 percent annual growth rate. Staff projected roughly the same growth rate to the year 2000. Thus the growth projections shown on the graph have also been expressed on specific population and household numbers for the years 1985, 1988, 1990, 1995, and 2000 (Exhibit "A "). The results of this change would maintain an overall buildout total for the City by the year 2000, but would extend the growth rate out over a longer period of time. Household size shows slight reduction during the intervening years from 3.2 to 2.8 persons per household, which reflects the regional trend as forecast by SCAG. Staff discussed these revisions with representatives of SCAG who have indicated they could be incorporated into a revised SCAG 182 population forecast and thus be reflected in the RHAM housing goals. Rancho Cucamonga is not alone in having concerns regardiny preparation of the RHAM. Other area cities are getting together to discuss problems of mutual interest. The recommendations from these meetings will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Staff will also be meeting with representatives from SCAG and any additional information will be brought to the City Council at the time of their consideration • of this report. • Is Revisions to Regional Housing Allocation Model City Council Agenda June 1, 1983 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council request revisions to the Draft RHAM and SCAG '82 growth estimates by adopting the attached Resolution and forwarding recommendations to SCAG. Respectfully submitted, RAg'�kL City Planner RG:TB:jr Attachments: Graph Resolution Exhibit "A" - Summary of Population Totals GRAPH 1 POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTIONS Rancho Cucamonga 150 0 V" „ �zo a 0 0 110 Z C 100 F a J a qo 0 a eo %o 55, z5o 50 1480 ige9 ,q6 1900 19go 19,15 4o 0 YEAR SCAG 82 -- - -- Mortgage Bond Study SOURCE: City of Rancho Cucamonga • Community Development Department MAY 1983 Exhibit "A" SUMMARY OF REVISED SCAG '82 GROWTH FORECAST FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA YEAR 1985 1988 1990 1995 2000 Population 69,000 84,000 93,000 110,000 127,500 Households 22,260 28,000 31,000 38,000 45,500 Household Size 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 if RESOLUTION NO. * 'I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUESTING A REVISION OF THE GROWTH FORECASTS AND POPULATION ESTIMATE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS CONTAINED WITHIN SCAG '82 AND REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has recently completed population and housing growth analysis which based its findings on area market demand for housing, area employment opportunities and local commuting patterns; and WHEREAS, the study has shown that the estimated growth forecast contained within SCAG '82 for population and housing to be to high for Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the future housing needs for this city as projected within the Draft Regional Housing Allocation Model are based upon SCAG 182 forecasts and are also to high. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: 1. That the growth forecasts for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as shown in the SCAG '82 forecast be revised as shown in Exhibit "A ". 2. That the growth forecast and assessment of housing needs in the Regional Housing Allocation Model be made consistent with the revisions as shown in Exhibit "A ". 3. That the Mayor forward these recommendations to the appropriate governing bodies, including the SCAG Executive Body. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. f �n 1 1550 W. 8th Street, Apt. 28 Upland, California 91786 May 26, 1983 Mr. Rick Gomez Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California •91730 Dear Mr. Gomez: In response to our request for a zoning variance for the Christmas House at 9240 Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, Mr. Lauren Wasserman suggested that we contact you with a more detailed proposal outlining our plans. We have enclosed a Copy of our original request, which pro- vides a very general overview of our intentions. Before providing more specific details, we'd first like to reiterate our enthusiasm for our project and our love of the house, which were our primary motivators in formulating our ideas. We'd like to take this opportunity to explain in greater detail our plans and to address what we believe might be the concerns of the City Council members - -and hopefully to alleviate these i concerns. In our original letter we very briefly stated that we intend to use the Christmas House as a private residence. We'd like to emphasize that this will be our primary residence. While it is true that what vie are proposing is a business venture, it will in fact be a very small one, with our primary intentions more of wanting to open and share the house with other people rather than to make money from it. We provided in our letter a veneral description of the concept of Bed -and- Brea�,tast Inns. While many bed- and - Breakfasts have developed into large multi -room inns representing hotels more than B- and -8s, many have retained the original concept of people opening a fete extra bedrooms in their home for travelers, which describes more accurately our intentions, The Christmas House has five bedrooms on the second floor; however, we are considering using the two bedrooms on the south as one adjoining suite, and having the option of using the two northwest bedrooms as a suite or single rooms. This would result in a maximum of only 3 -4 parties of guests at any one time. We want to create an atmosphere of warn hospitality, with personal attention to guests and to details such as fresh fruits and flowers in every room, thick terrycloth towels, homebaked goods in abundance, and bicycles and lawn crocor,1, available for guests spending the day. Food service available will be very light, consisting of continental broakfasts served in a cor.,mon dining area or outside in the garden, or if guests prefer, .a in their bedroom. Our primary aim, as we. stated in our letter, is to make Mr. Rick Gomez Page 2 May 25, 1983 the Christmas House a gracious, hospitable home in which travelers are made to feel comfortable and welcome. In addition to accormodating travelers, another viable use of the Christmas House that we envision is accommodating friends and family visiting residents of Rancho Cucamonga, who need extra bedroom space for their guests. Many people are faced with this situation, yet are hesitant in suggesting a hotel. The Christmas House would provide a unique, practical alternative to this situation and would provide a home -like atmosphere. In this way we could be a convenient and valuable asset to the neighborhood. We also proposed opening the house for weddings and various types of recep- tions. The type of weddings we have in mind are very small garden weddings for approximately 20 -30 people, on weekends only and ending by early evening. We would not allow loud music but rather have in mind classical music such as string quartets, recorder ensembles, classical guitar, or flute /harpsichord ensembles, in keeping with the style of the house. Use of alcohol at receptions would be limited to champagne or wine. We value the historical significance of the house and want to give it the dignity and status that it deserves as a landmark. We believe the house is in sound condition but plan extensive work in restoration, including retaining and refurbishing the polished wooden floors, and furnishing the house with period antiques, remodeling in its original Victorian style as much as possible, with close attention to comfort. We also plan extensive landscaping, with secluded garden areas in the back and north side of the house. We are strictly opposed to removing any of the existing trees or shrubbery but will incorporate them in our plans. We plan minimal landscaping in the front of the house - -we want to retain an openness in the front that will draw the attention to the house itself. We feel the palms adequately provide a very simple elegant framing of the house. We are considering using the adjacent lot to the south of the house for our parking needs. It should provide more than adequate space for the minimal parking area that our plans will require. We also value the importance of traditions, and as vie stated in our original letter, want to keep the historical tradition associated with the Christmas House in the past by opening up the house every year for Christmas festivities, We want the Christmas feeling of goodwill to be associated with the house throughout the year. We understand very well your concerns for mixing commercial and residential zoning and the potential problems this can create in the neighborhood. We would like to stress that we want to be a good neighbor, and that we believe our plans will not pose any problems, but rather enhance the neighborhood. He also want to emphasize that the Christmas House is somewhat isolated from "I Mr. Rick Gomez Page 3 May 26, 1983 ' the neighborhood, in that the house is the only one facing Archibald Avenue. We feel the minimal commercial activities of our plans will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding neighborhood. We hope this proposal fully explains our plans and answers any questions that may have arisen from our original request. Given that we are successful in our bid, we hope to have full support of the Community Development Department and the City Council. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Janice Toews ox- i - lj Jay` Ilsley c c- `"C.' —Wasserman