Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/07/06 - Agenda PacketDSO Ct +CA.tio�o Cffy OF RANT" CUGkN10N 3A CITY TT� C\AOUINUL U ; AGEN .A 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California July 6, 1983 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: BulUet_, Dahl ^, Frost_, Schlosser_, and Mikels C. Approval of Minutes: June 1, 1983. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Thursday, July 7, 1983, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, 7:00 P.M. Lions Park Community Center. b. Wednesday, July 13, 1983, PLANNING COMMISSION, 7:OD p.m., Lions Park Community Center. c. Monday, July 18, 1983, City Council Revenue Sharing Hearing, 7:00 p.m., Lions Park Community Center. d. Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency executive session, Monday, July 18, 1983, 7:15 p.m., Lions Park Community Center. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Assessment District 82 -1, May, 1983 in the amount of $440,226.24, and approval of warrant, Assessment District 82 -2, May, 1983 in the amount of $630.00. 1 • City Council Agenda -2-- July 6, 1983 b. Forward Claim against the City by Kelly M. Glover to the 2 City Attorney and Carl Warren Co. for han,^1'.ng. c. Forward Claim against the City by Sharon Lee Surber to 3 the City Attorney and Carl Warren Co. for handling. d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for on -sale 4 general eating place license to Anthony and Mary Ann Vernola, Magic Lamp Inn, Inc., 8189 Foothill Blvd. e. Agreement for Amethyst Avenue Street Improvements. 5 Recommend approval of cooperative agreement between the City, Cucamonga County Water District and Harley Lovitt to jointly construct a portion of Amethyst Avenue between Lemon and Banyan. f. Hellman Avenue Improvement Agreement for Water and Sewer 9 Improvement. Recommend approval of agreement with the Cucamonga County Water District to include certain water and sewer works in the construction of Hellman and Foothill intersection improvements. g. Alta Loma Park Jogging Tract. It is recommended that 14 • Council authorize the Finance Department to exceed Purchase Order #2430 by $1,600.00 for the purchase of decomposed granite (D.G.) for the jogging tract. h. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6726 submitted by Quong- Watkins 15 Properties and located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Blvd. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -101 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6726. 1. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement submitted by Lightner 18 Development Company for Tract 10491 and release of Bonds and Agreement previously submitted for said Tract by Eastwood Homes, Ltd. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -102 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10491 SUBMITTED BY LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND RELEASING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED BY EASTWOOD HOMES, LTD. City Council Agenda -3- July 6, 1983 0j. Approval of Parcel Map 7963 and Real Property 29 - Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Barton Development Co. and located at the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Haven Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -103 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7963 RESOLUTION NO. 83- 105 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 7963 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. k. Release of Bonds: 38 Tracts 9267, 9268, d 9269 - Located generally West of Archibald and North of Banyan Release of Cash Staking Deposit L.D. King, Inc. $1,335.14 • Steven Sanberg $5,964.86 - Tracts 9267 and 9268 Located generally West of Archibald and North of Banyan Faithful Performance Bonds (Road) Tract No. 9267 $88,000 Tract No. 9268 $136,000 Tract No. 9436 - Located generally South of Victoria and East of Haven. Owner: Crismar Homes Maintenance Guarantee Bond $5,300.00 Tract 9637 - Located generally East of Amethyst and North of Lemon. Owner: Crismar Homes Acceptance of: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $10,000 Release of: Faithful Performance Bond $200,000 Parcel Map 5922 - located generally South of 19th Street and Fast of Jasper. Owner: Robert Bowdoin. Release of: Faithful Performance Bond $48,513.02 City Council Agenda -4- July 6, 1983 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -104 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 9267 AND 9268, AND TRACT 9637 AND PARCEL MAP 5922, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. 1. Tentative Tracts 12316 -1 and 12317 -1 - Lewis. Approval 44 of Agreement for construction of model homes prior to final subdivision map recordation. m. Set Public Hearing - July 20, 1983 - Environmental Assessment and Zone Change 83-01 - Christeson. A change of zone from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to C -2 (General Business Commercial) for 13.1 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077 - 401- 01,03• n. Service Recognition Awards - Eligibility Requirements. 58 o. Approval of Parcel Map 7891, Bonds and Agreement and 60 Lien Agreement submitted by Herbert Hawkins, Inc. and located on the south side of Foothill Blvd. approximately 250 feet east of Turner Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -106 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7891, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION N0. 83 -107 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM HERBERT HAWKINS, INC. FOR PARCEL MAP 7891 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME p. Approval of Tract Maps 11173 and 11173 -1 submitted by M. 74 J. Brock and Sons, Inc. and located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -108 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP OF TRACTS 11173 AND 11173 -1. • City Council Agenda -5- July 6, 1983 q. Approval of resolution indicating the City's desire for and willingness to participate in modification of the Foothill Blvd. /Interstate 15 interchange and requesting that CalTrans proceed with, the project development process. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -109 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INDICATING THE CITY'S DESIRE FOR AND WILLINGNESS TO PARTICIPATE IN MODIFICATIONS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - INTERESTATE 15 INTERCHANGE AND REQUESTING THAT CALTRANS PROCEED WITH COORDINATION OF THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FOR THESE MODIFICATIONS. r. Authorization to advertize for bid on the Hellman Avenue Improvement Project from south of Foothill Blvd. to the Pacific Electric tracks. Budget $650,000. s. Bequest to set public hearing date for Revenue Sharing • Budget for August 3, 1983• 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE FROM CENTER AVENUE EAST APPROXIMATELY 520 FEET ADJACENT TO CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -34 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS. An amendment to the sign regulations contained within Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. This is a comprehensive amendment intended to improve its administration and to provide for more effective signing. The basic regulations are not being Changed. Staff report by Rick Gomez. City Council Agenda -6- July 6, 1983 • ORDINANCE NO. 65 -B (second reading) 81 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 14.04, 14.08, 14.12, 14.16, 14.20, AND-14.28 OF TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE WHICH REGULATES SIGNS. C. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. Item contined from June 15, 1983 meeting. (A) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW. (B) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: ADOPTION. RESOLUTION NO. 83-79 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. ORDINANCE NO. 203 (second reading) 98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REGULATORY PROVISIONS SECTION OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP FOR THE ETIWANDA AREA ACCORDING TO THESE PROVISIONS. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 99 33- 4. An ordinance amending Section 61.0219(6)(7), Residential Parking Standards, of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance. Staff report by Rick Gomez. Recommendation: Adoption of Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 123 -B (first reading) 113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0219(b)(7) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 123, RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS. E. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A 115 -REQUEST TO MODIFY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -04 - VINEYAND RANK. A request to expand their existing modular facilities With an additional 926 square feet, related parking, and an extension of time. Staff report by Rick Gomez. r 1 City Council Agenda -T- July 6, 1983 Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends that the City Council uphold their decision to approve the modification and time extension. F. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -03• An amendment to the 137 residential use standards to allow for second dwelling units on single family zoned residential lots. Staff report by Rick Gomez. Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of Ordinance 204 -A amending Ordinance 204 to reduce parking requirements for temporary /removable second dwelling units. ORDINANCE NO. 204 -A (first reading) 140 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 204, REGARDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC 141 PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01. An amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan regarding development standards for interim uses. Staff report by Rick Gomez. Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends approval of amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -110 1583 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INTERIM USES. H. VACATION OF THE SERVICE ROAD LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE 160 OF FOOTHILL BLVD. IN CONNECTION WITH PARCEL MAP 6174 SUBMITTED BY VISTA INVESTMENT. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. RESOLUTION NO. 83-80 1.61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE (PARCEL MAP 6114). 11 City Council Agenda -8- July 6, 1983 ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR PARCEL NAP 7349. It is recommended that City Council approve the resolution ordering the work in connection with Parcel Map 7349 located on the north side of 4th Street, east of the Route 15 Freeway. Request continuance to August 3, 1983 City Council meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 5. ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION A. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING CERTAIN ADULT BUSINESSES. An ordinance prohibiting certain nude conduct in establishments which serve alcoholic beverages. ORDINANCE NO. 200 -B (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 9.08 THERETO PROHIBITING CERTAIN NUDE CONDUCT IN ESTABLISHMENTS WHICH SERVE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION, AND DECLARING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. B. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE AND APPROVAL OF FEES. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. ORDINANCE NO. 63-A (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 6.04 OF TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELIMINATING MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS WHICH CONFLICT WITH PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED PROVISIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO ANIMALS. 162 165 176 178 • City Council Agenda -9- July 6, 1983 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. REQUEST TO CONSIDER REGULATING ICE CREAN VENDORS The 179 City has received a request from Walter Hickel and other concerned citizens to consider regulating ice cream vendors in residential tracts. B. REQUEST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF 16A GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) TO MODIFY THE REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL (RHAM) The housing forecast from the RHAM provided for a disproportionate allocation of housing goals for Rancho Cucamonga and other areas in San Bernardino County. The Council will consider a resolution recommending changes to the RHAM process. Staff report by Rick Gomez. Recommendation: Approval of resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -113 105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO THE REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL AND • ITS RESULTS. C. EQUESTRIAN TRAIL GUIDELINES. Amending Resolution 81 -93 18C establishing trail design standards. Staff report by Rick Gomez. Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends adoption of Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -93A 229 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING RESOLUTION 81- 93, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI- PURPOSE, COMMUNITY, AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. D. ALTA LOMA CHANNEL DESIGN CONTRACT ADDENDUM NO. 2 230 Approval recommended for addendum to change design contract to reflect changes in the scope of work on the Alta Loma Channel design net cost increase $3,800.00. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. E. A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ACA35 Report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, RESOLUTION NO. 83- 114 237 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NUMBER THIRTY -FIVE (ACA 35). City Council Agenda -10- July 6, 1983 •.. SET JULY 20, 1983, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC NEARING ON 241 THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. Recommendation to approve Engineer's Report and the two resolutions and set date of July 20, 1983 for a public hearing to form districts. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -115 242 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 83-116 244 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 1, RESOLUTION NO. 83 -117 251 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 83 -11U 253 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS No items submitted 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS VA. CONSIDERATION OF HISTORIC COMMISSION VACANCY. Vacancy in Historic Preservation Commission due to resignation of Robert L. Hickoz. 9. ADJOURNMENT • June 1, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, June 1, 1983• The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to • approve, the minutes of April 19 and April 20, 1983• Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 2. ANNOUNCEWNTS a. Thursday, June 2, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. b. Tuesday, June 7, at Red Lion Inn, Opportunity '83, Economic Development Conference from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. C. Friday, June 10, West End Board of Realtors will challenge the Mayors of the West End at a donkey basketball game to be held at Alta Loma High School. d. Mr. Wasserman requested item "j" and "n" be removed from the Consent Calendar. e. Mr. Dahl requested item "g" be removed; Mayor Mikels requested item "p" be removed; and Mr. Buquet requested item "o" be removed for discussion. El City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 2 • 3. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Warrants, Registers No. 83 -05 -17 and 83 -6 -1 and payroll ending 5 -15 -83 in the amount of $498,621.68. b. Forward Claim against the City by Insurance Company of North America to the City Attorney and Carl Warren Co. for handling. c. Forward Claim against the City by Carol Ann Brendel to the City Attorney and Carl Warren Co. for handling. d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for on -sale beer and wine public premise license to Darlene H. Schultz, Scotty's Bar, 8890 Eighth Street. e. Request approval to advertise for bids for construction of a storm drain on Beryl Street from Alta Loma Park to 19th Street. f. Request approval to advertise for bids for construntion of a sidewalk on Base Line from Hellman Avenue to Alta Loma High School. g. Request that the TPe € €le Analyst peeition in Engineering to Peplaeed by tPena €eP e€ an Assistant Civil Engineer, end request eetherleatlen to reePN3t Ter the vaeant Aeeeeiete Civil Engineer peeitien. Item removed by Council for discussion. • h. Request authorization of $6,216, from Beautification Funds, to fund sidewalk extensions at bridge crossings of the Cucamonga Creek. i. Approval of Parcel Map 7646, surety, and agreement submitted by Calvin Morgan located on the south side of Hillside between Carnelian and Beryl. RESOLUTION N0. 83 -71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7646, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. 3. Regosot eppPeval to remove eleender sheets planted along the Gesmwnity Trail at 9999 Hennnnsta Orive at Beryl. RE996GTION NO, 83 -R2 A RFSQ6i TI9N OF THE CITY GGWNG16 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CGCAH9N9Ar CA6IFORNIAr E9TAR618HINP A P96TCY PNONIETTING THE PLANTING OF TOXIC P6ANT8 A69NG COHHNNITY TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CNGAMONPA. Item removed by staff. k. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7834 located on the north side of Via El Dorado and the west side of Sunstone, submitted by Jensen. • City Council Minutes June 1, 1583 • Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -73 A P,ESO'.,UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7834. 1. Approval of improvement extension agreement for Minor Development Review 82 -Od located at 8270 Foothill Blvd. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82 -08. M. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7832 located at the northwest corner of Hillside and Moonstone Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7832. • n. AeeeptsRee e£ Pape.} Mal) 64447 hendaT agreemeRtT and lien agreement ewbmitted by William Campbell leeeted at the seathweet earner e£ Peethill Blvd. and panenR Avenue. Item removed by staff. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6114, BONDS, AGREEMENT, AND A REAL PROPERTY CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT. e. AatheriBatien to extend city a € €ieee+ lease agreement POP one additional yearT at existing Pater to expire Jane 39T 4964. Item removed for discussion by Council. p. Regeeet autherieatien for emergeney Pee€ repair at Liens Per1f community center -- net to exeeed 44T9991 Item removed by Council for discussion. q. Set public hearing date for June 15, 1983 for Environmental Assessment and Sign Ordinance Revisions. An amendment to the sign regulations contained in Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. This is a comprehensive amendment intended to improve the administration and to provide for more effective signing. The basic regulations are not being changed. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar (items g, j, n, o, and p removed). Motion carried 10 unanimously 5 -0. City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 4 Discussion of Item "g ": Mr. Dahl stated that the staff report only mentioned the Assistant Civil Engineer positon. He asked what the salary of the Associate Civil Engineer was and what the cost impact would be. Mr. Hubbs stated that the Associate position is currently an approved position. By filling this position, then the budget picture would not be changed from what was currently approved. This is why that item was not discussed. Mr. Hubbs also stated that we had an Associate position reclassified to an Assistant position. Therefore, when the reclassification occurred, it opened up an Associate position. In other words, Mr. Dahl stated that what we are doing is moving the Assistant Engineer which is presently performing the position of an Associate Engineer at an Assistant Engineer's salary base. Then we will be moving the Assistant Engineer into a position of Traffic Analyst with an increased salary rate over what a Traffic Analyst normally receives. Mr. Hubbs stated this was correct; it would amount to approximately a 5 percent rate increase. Mr. Wasserman pointed out that we would also be eliminating a part time student aid position. The net result would be about an $8,000 a year savings. • Discussion of Item we ": Mr. Buquet expressed we should not be locked into a two year lease. He felt we should be exploring some other alternatives. Mr. Wasserman stated that the only alternative was to build something. It would take us about the same length of time to do so. If Council is looking at other rental facilities, then we would be precluded. Mr. Buquet did not want to lock us into this point of time, but he felt a decision should not be made • tonight off the Consent Calendar. After further discussion, Council concurred to discuss this at the June 15 meeting. Discussion of Item "p ": Mayor Mikels wanted to know what the emergency was that the money was being requested from reserves. Mr. Wasserman responded that Lion's Center roof leaked. Since we can't have contingency funds any longer, then the amount will have to come from reserves. Discussion of Item "j ": Mr. Dahl requested that we proceed to have the oleanders removed. Mr. Frost, requested that staff work with the people to give them some time to remove the oleanders themselves before the City went in to remove them. Staff had previously requested to have Resolution No. 83 -72 removed since, according to the City Attorney, it would not have enforcing powers. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to approve Consent Calendar items "g", "p", and part of "j ". Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. EIIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSOCIATED ITEMS. Staff report by Otto Kroutil and Tim Beedle. • City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 • Page 5 (1) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW. Mr. Kroutil briefly reviewed changes made to date. He stated there were three new items for consideration. (a) Water Conservation. A request has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District to include some additional text regarding water conservation. Mayor Mikels asked if there was any discussion on the suggested revisions by Council. Council had none. (b) Fire Protection. The request had been handed out just prior to the meeting this evening. Mr. Kroutil stated that staff has gone through the text and there appears to be no substantive change to the intent of the Plan. It was more in terms of clarification. It states the need to follow fire codes, etc. Mayor Mikels asked if there was any discussion by Council regarding the communication from the Fire District. There was none. (c) Interim Agricultural Uses. Mayor Mikels asked if there were any question on the language proposed. Mr. Frost stated he could see some potential problems with some types of permitted uses in infill areas. Generally the 2 1/2 acre criteria was not a • problem, but there were some examples where this would be too small to adequately address surrounding areas insofar as raising hogs as an example. Mr. Kroutil pointed out that the language presented is part of the development code and this would not be any different in Etiwanda than elsewhere in the City. Staff's intent was to include the langage here since the questions would came up. Mr. Frost stated his question was did they feel we had sufficient control over future uses. After further discussion, Council concurred that if this needed to be addressed further, then it should be addressed as a General Plan Change. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing on the previous items relating to the Specific Plan and for the new items by the Water District and Fire District and for the interim agricultural uses. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve the language revisions as submittred by the Water District and Fire District, and the proposed language for interim agriculture uses. Motion carried unanimously 5- 0. I El City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 6 (2) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. Mr. Kroutil stated the Final • Environmental Impact Report was required by State law. Mr. Kroutil stated that the text changes were reflected in the EIR. Mayor Mikeis opened the meeting for public hearing for comments on the EIR. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk 'Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -77. RESOLUTION NO. 83-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01B AND FOR THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IS COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE. Mr. Frost stated that the only complication he could preceive is whether it adequately reflects some of the changes in circulation and land uses and whether the EIR should be altered the reflect the impact of those changes. Mr. Kroutil stated this had to do with traffic and other impacts. As far as other impacts are concerned, staff has looked at the project within the limitations of the General Plan which would allow a bit more in terms of total population in future development. As far as specific traffic patterns • resulting from specific land use decisions, he would have to refer this to the city engineer. Mr. Hubbs stated they have analyzed various traffic impacts at various levels of development and basically ended up with the same conclusions. The current plan is lower in intensity than some of the earlier plans. He felt their concerns regarding Etiwanda Avenue has been dealt with adequately in the EIR. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Environmental Impact Report and to waive full reading of Resolution No. 83 -77. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. (3) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01B. Mayor Mikeis opened the meeting for public hearing on the General Plan Amendment 83-010. Addressing Council were: Dr. Roland Smith, owner of property on the southwest corner of Etiwnada and Base Line, and which is currently zoned residential. Mr. Smith stated in light of the changes that are proposed, the property will be heavily impacted not only with respect to the fair market value, but also disposal of the property would be impaired. Mr. and Mrs. Smith felt their concerns had not been properly addressed. If these concerns are not properly addressed, they would be taking the necessary action to have a judgement filed until they feel properly heard to their satisfaction. City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 • Page 7 Mayor Mikels asked him to summarized his concerns. Mr. Smith stated that his ooncern was that a commercial zone came in that they were not aware of across the street from them which will impact their area and depreciate their value. Their property is designated low - medium and all around them is commercial. They had tried several times to obtain a commercial designation for their property and have been turned down. He also has another ten acres which has been designated as a school area off Pecan. He feels all of this is unfair. Arne Smith stated that they felt they had been discriminated against since they had not been notified about the other area being designated commercial. There being no further response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -78. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN. • Mr. Frost stated that item 4 should be heard before item 3• Mr. Reedle pointed out that State law requires that prior to the adoption of a Specific Plan, it must be found to be consisent with the General Plan. Therefore, it is a matter that the General Plan should be in place first prior to actual adoption of a Specific Plan. Mr. Dougherty concurred with Mr. Deedle. Mayor Mikels felt that perhaps Council should hold Resolution No. 83 -79 to be approved at the same time as Ordinance No. 203• Motion: Moved by euquet, seconded by Schlosser to approve ,Resolution No. 83- 78. Motion parried unanimously 5 -0. (4) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: ADOPTION. Mr. Dougherty pointed out that a new first reading of the Ordinance would be required. Action on Resolution No. 83 -79 could be taken tonight or at the time action is taken on the Ordinance. Mayor Mikels felt the approval of the Specific Plan should be done at the same as the regulating ordinance. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing to consider Ordinance No. 31 203• There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 8 City Clerk Waserman read the title of Ordinance No. 203. • ORDINANCE NO. 203 (aeeend first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REGULATORY PROVISIONS SECTION OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP FOR THE ETIWANDA AREA ACCORDING TO THESE PROVISIONS. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 203• Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels set June 15 for second reading and consideration of Resolution No. 83 -79. D. SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT: DRAFT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. • Lauren Wasserman requested item be continued to July 6, 1983• RESOLUTION NO. 83 -54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH HOUSING UNITS PRODUCED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to continue to July 6. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. C. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01A - EANOKVECHAYANT. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan for medium density residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) to medium -high residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue - APN 227- 091 -45. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikelo opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Tom Davis, 9581 Business Center Drive, architect retained to prepare some exhibits which he went over. • City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 • Page 9 Jim Banks, Etiwanda resident, stated that Don Baer had opposed this at the Planning Commission public hearing. As of a week ago, Mr. Baer stated he had not changed his mind. Mr. Banks stated the only reason he would be in favor of a development like this was that he. did not like to see the small landowners having to have second hand treatment compared to the large landowners. But for all other reasons, he would definitely be opposed to this. He expressed concern with the 4 -14 category and did not want to see this increased to 16. People in Etiwanda do not want the higher density, and felt that Council should draw the line and it should be drawn now. There being no further public response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Mr. Buquet expressed that a 4 -14 range was ridiculous, but that was another issue. One of his concerns is the present land use north of the subject property. He was not sure how conducive that site would be to develop around. If nothing else, this project would help hide that use. He also expressed concern over the density of 16 and wanted something done to prohibit this from coming in higher. Mr. Dahl agreed that density was an issue in the City, but he felt that of all areas in the City, this one which was adjacent to a channel, railroad track, and a lumber yard deserved a higher density. However, if this is built, it • should be built at the low end of the density scale. Discussion followed by Council regarding the density designation. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to leave the density as is, uphold the Planning Commission's decision, and deny the appeal. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: Dahl, Buquet ADSENT: None D. VACATION OF SERVICE ROAD. Located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista Investment. Item originally set for the March 16 city council meeting. Lloyd Hubbs, city engineer, requested the item be continued to July 6, 1983. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to continue to July 6. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Is City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 10 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE (PARCEL MAP 6114). E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -03• An amendment to the residential use standards to allow for second dwelling units on single family zoned residential lots. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 204. ORDINANCE NO. 204 (second reading) • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.024A (b) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW FOR SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES. • Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 204. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance No. 204. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels 140ES: None ABSENT: None e•1 *n Mayor Mikels called a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. with all members of the Council present. 5. ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION None submitted. • City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 • Page 11 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. Pat English of the San Bernardino County Animal Control was present to answer questions of Council. Mayor Mike'_s opened the meeting for public input. David Flocker asked if animal control provided for the licensing of cats as well. Staff responded no. There being no further input, the public portion of the meeting was closed. Discussion followed between Council and Mr. English regarding the contract. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to accept the staff proposal and approve the Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for animal control. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. D. REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL (RRAM). Staff report by Rick Gomez, • City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was: Ralph Lewis, Lewis Homes, asked why were they concerned. Was it better to have too high a figure or too low a figure. Mayor Mikels responded that the population numbers, especially during the current five -year period, are important in the determination of the number of very low and low cost housing which the City would have to provide to maintain the consistency of its housing element with its housing assistance plan and the regional housing allocation model thats being developed. The SCAG projections were based upon growth projections which were developed when SCAG '82 was in process and the first three years of that process show relatively little growth. When they developed the RHAM model, they compressed the growth from the growth which had been anticipated in those two years plus the growth which was anticipated in the next five into one five -year period. Because of that, the numbers of very low and lost cost housing that would have to be provided under that growth curve would have been beyond the capabilities of the City to provide; over 4,000 units in one year. There being no further public input, the p;blie portion of the meeting was closed. I City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 12 . Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to adopt Resolution No. 83 -81 and to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Resolution No. 83 -81. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING REVISION OF THE GFO'dTH PROJECTIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SCAG '82 AND RHAM HOUSING MODEL. C. STATUS OF PROPOSED COUNTY SOLID WASTE REFUSE RATE ADJUSTMENT, Oral staff report by Robert Rizzo, Administrative Analyst. Mr. Ed. Burr, Rancho Disposal, expressed that those in the industry supported what Council was attempting to do. If the Board of Supervisors raised the rates, then the refuse companies will want to come back at the June 15th meeting to request a rate increase. D. CHRISTMAS HOUSE REQUEST. A request to review proposal to convert the Christmas House to a Bed and Breakfast Inn. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. Addressing Council were Janice Toews and Jay Illsey who were requesting a • response from Council regarding their proposal as to whether there is some merit in the concept. Chief Feuerstein pointed out there was a difference in what would be allowable for a residential use and what would be required for commercial use in terms of alarms systems, wiring, sprinkler systems, etc. Mr. Dougherty stated the property is now located in a R -1 zone and at the present time the use would not be permitted in this zone. He stated he noticed there was a request for a zone variance. The State law was amended several years ago to preclude the granting of use variances. This would be a use variance and as such would be prohibited. Mayor Mikels stated they could not do any more than give them their receptivity to the concept. There was no legal binding action by Council. Mr. Frost stated he would like to see the structure maintained, and would like the City to be somewhat flexible in helping that to happen. However, he needed the assurance that it would be done well, otherwise he would vote against it. Mr. .Schlosser stated, "no comment." • City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 • Page 13 Mr. Dahl stated he had problems with the type of use being recommended for the area being recommended. He would not be real favorable at the moment, but could be subject to change with a better presentation. Mr. Buquet stated he strongly cautioned against bidding on the House that is basically in a residential spot zone. He felt they should he concerned with the actual cost of renovation of the house. He felt their estimates were too low. Mayor M.ikels stated the house is in a R -1 zone, but it has commercial across the street. The lot is of sufficient size to provide for use like is being suggested. He would not rule it out. It could be made compatible in concept. But what actually came in in actual plan was a different story. E. SETTING OF HEARINGS FOR CONSIDERATION OF FISCAL YEAR 83-84 PROGRAM OF SERVICE. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. Council set the following dates: June 14 at 6:00 p.m. for supper at Lions Park Center to discuss the Program of Service. June 30 at 6:00 p.m. for supper. Advertise the public hearing for 7:00 p.m. • for Revenue Sharing. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS There were none submitted. There were none submitted. 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to adjourn to Executive Session, not to reconvene this evening. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 10;40 p.m. CI RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE 05/04/83 05/04/83 05/13/83 05/13/83 05/13/83 05/13/83 05/13/83 05/13/83 05/17/83 05/17/83 05/25/83 05/25/83 05/25/83 05/25/83 05/25/83 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 V=NOOR HATCH BEDROSIAN WILLDAN ASSOC. GENERAL TELEPHONE .ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS RICHARD MILLS ASSOC. MSI WILLDAN ASSOC. STATIONER'S CORP_ BONADEMA.N- McCAIN INC. HATCH BEDROSIAN BUILDING NEWS INC. R(CHARO MILLS ASSOC. PACIFIC COMPUTER SUPPLY BRUNIG ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS • WARRANT REGISTER MAY 1983 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 ACTIVITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES UTILITIES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES PRINTING E PUBLICATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT t 49-23 -28 49-23 -28 49-23-21 49-23-28 49 -23-28 49-23-28 49 -23 -26 49-23-24 49 -23 -28 49 -23-28 49 -23 -23 49-23 -28 49 -23 -24 49 -23 -24 49-23-28 TOTALS AMOUNT $ 1,280.00 529.75 34.60 3.382.09 2,656.25 15.617.60 447.05 75.52 408,949.21 1,280.00 96.19 2,508.50 200.65 67.35 3,163.48 $ 440,228.24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WARRANT REGISTER MAY 1983 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 824 DATE 'UARRAP,T 4 VENDOR ACTIVITY ACCOUNT 1,' AMOUNT 05/13/83 509 DON OWEN G ASSOC. CONTRACT SERVICES 49-24 -28 5 630,00 TOTAL $ 630,00 t 8 7 10 11 13 iS 16 17 12 is ] P 28 LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD WILSON 1900 BANK o, FN AMERICA W[` Ox[ Iiv BOU 1LVwR9 GRANGE CALIFORNIA 93668 1-CINO1.E I7191 6U-- N.E =;:xy for Claimant, KELLY M. GLOVER KELLY M. GLOVER, ) Claimant, ) Vs. ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ) CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ) Respondents. ) BPACG BELOW FOR FILE \G 31AUP ONLY) CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONCA ADMINISTRATION AM JUN 23 M $19t�511�I112�3�gi5�6 IC Cis` C7`�`� C'C. � t1;C �+✓ CLAIM FOR INDEMNITY (Government Code, §910) YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that KELLY M. GLOVER, whose address is 8990 19th Street, #921, Rancho Cucamonga California 91701, claims damages from the for indemnity in an amount as yet undetermined at this time. This claim is based on damages sustained by KATHI,SEN ROBINSON, a minor by her Guardians Ad Litem, WILLIAM ROBINSON and SANDRA ROBINSON, on or about March 15, 1982 at approximately 2:1S p.m. when KATHLEEN ROBINSON, a minor, was 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10' Z 11 0 J p`> 131 3 0< o = -<� 18'� w u'e° 16 ILLigL, °. o °F 17, 3 I 18 19i 20 21 Ili 221 231 24i 25. 26 I 27 i'I 2811 being chased by D. ULIBARRI and D. KRAEGER who chased decedent and said decedent ran onto Church Street and was struck by a •' vehicle which resulted in decedent's death, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, at or near Alta Loma Junior High School. The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim is unknown since the damages sustained by the plaintiffs, if any, are unknown at this time, but this claimant is seeking indemnity from the respondent for whatever damages that the plaintiffs may recover against this claimant. All notices or other communications with regard to i this claim should be sent to claimant's attorney at: LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD WILSON One City Boulevard West, Suite 327A Orange, California 92668 (714) 634 -3942 DATED: June 17, 1983 LAW OFFICES OF OF EDWARD WILSON EDWARD NILSON, Attorney for Claimant CO : 4 cr;n CLAIM FOR D,vM.vGE ON INJURY (Lfx- I • Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property must be filed not later thann'%'.^'-- ^ " -'�'I 1C0 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). • ov for e to real property must be filed not Inter than I (year offer the occurrence (Gov Codee, , Secc. . 911.2). TO: CITY OF__gZ_� r �,�i,n„ Name of Claimant Address Zip one Pge `-CmJ R ('��O' Address to which Claimant wishes notires sent WHEN did dcmcge or injury occur? WHERE did damage r injury occur ? / 9e I Y /C, � �fh ^�co� Ta sg /-."Pr r/F HO':J and under what circumstances dO- domo r injury occure k /- ^7 r.f� GI,fL^t `� °< -•,✓sue ° / r!- -- //,} - -lr' AT parliculcr action by joie City, or if'i (Include nemos of emaloyees, if known) eged damage or injuryk WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amnunl of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known of the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible) P Total Amount Claimed NAMES and oddresse•, of :v irnessns, Dortars and Ilos Hospitals: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P ADMINISTR TION AM JUN 29 1983 71181900 IZ111218f4IN6 tll I DATE' 70 3 /�.- f Sflzf /7n1 7 Sinn n!urn • .-1 APRICAiION FOR ALCOHOLIC RNlRADE IICFNS[(S) T.: DY,,,. ar of Al .holl: UlTHAR. Cadlal Rree $pp Bernardino Sad d.ry Sxromenre, Call. pSBI8 Th. LT. ,... d....edhA.br epphe, Ew 4nmer dnoAed or lolls.,; I. ttpElA OF IICFNSFIiI ___, RIFE NO. D;1 SAL-, G49iBAL Applied under See 2b4 ❑ Eermre Der.: I SDVa nee RECEIPT ry 10137 CODE }ulj CODE 3615 Dap hated T. NMIFISI OF AMICANT(5) It., P-1 Fern r a oap 1!AOIC ' „V!P IL ?fe I::0. Pros. - Pat F ^e^;Ola ]. 1TPE(51 OF iRANSAC ➢ON(SI IFEE LIC. TIE .t. - nllt. cny Y. 'vorWla SOC /C:0 - von Bird Per. T3f.(24071) s 47 (Self - Incorporation) 1. Name of Surinerr Marie La:e Inn Inc. d. 1—,— al eo„aeu_NUme<r and St'. 8189 Foothill Blvd. - Gry atd Lp Cade C-,, Rancho 0ucaclonva 91730 San Bndo 1 s 50,-0 .. ma ^G7804 �tl.amtaurel �IUvland, aC he 91746 Pen rr -.I u...1 v. nave rav ever Lem -,,,nee of a IdaarT ID. Hale yap a violated am df the pradriam of me Aleehn4c 7 . eel rat• C.rd"I All ar ,eG Iola- aE m. Dep.,1 e 1 pee. E nmg re the Any JI. E.ploia a "YES” om«er ro nemr Gov To en as eno[h -el «hmh ,%.T L. deemed pan of Ih,, .,1 -lea. 11. Aeph[ t e, e rhar ey m taper -Played i wI. < e e pre ..II I.T. Irl:e at °M IT) rharh ;ln r nor [au ° r pat Ir P Ce rata;ed el the °1 Th. AI[P IP[ Cetr rPl An U. STATE OF CALIFORNIA C.amy of -------------- P Bernardino, Da,e 6-2y aye .. / ..r..._. .. « r. ... aR° APPLICATION BY TRANSRROR 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA C—, of__ G1R.!EeL'IdLQSS10 ............. Cate Y: %3 -+1.3 ----------------- . VSBIIOLr Anthony P._ _'- _ 11'71:i0u, vary Ann v:Rno!.a, Pat P. IG Lnmlmt Id-Ill old Sneed Cdy atd Epp Cade Ball, 8327 Pooth 111 Blvd, r lancho nl,vh, IVNr man Thu Ginty Pn, Orlmnmrnl l'v OHI, Aua[hed Rrw.ded roses, ndaoap paper, _ .. . ❑ ......... .... . ... ... ... ....... COMES MARFD ......._ .__ ..P-2jaQj.. .......... _...�..... I1p..,..al IT rl.. ..... Gn.d nr .. .. .. oa- rt ................ Pr.1'a. rin gIICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC B"ERAGE IICBNSIj S) T°, Oep nmenl °I AI[ohd¢ Mrerap. ConM1OI IPoI Nood.., San Bezaardiro x[r.mmm. C.I.I. vsete r appb« 1.1 the vvI d,f—ed -f for Lnnpr der.nb.d °, 1°Ilo.p I. TYPUSI OF UCENSESI .......... . KE NO. RFCFipllV01,J "7 _ r ..n gale eneral atin� Place Applied under S¢ 2bU En.a D °l.. "d!=1a 3 ne 1 CODE 161 col E 3615 Dme " hwed 2. NA EISI OF APPLICANT(S) temp. perms Ennlrve Dme !,nt.'.o :y P. V4riil0i,d, Marl Ann and Pat P. J. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTrON(S) FEE LIC' TYPE • Per. TDL. (Sec. 21,072) 3 625.03 47 (n11111 Son) C7 1. Nome of Boom A,acic Lane Inn , Inc. 5. L°Cmion or ev,ma.- NVmpe, ane Sf e , 9189 7oothill Blvd. Gry and Lp C.de Covnp Of iOGE 3 J2J•CO sno.irp�L.',7< :.47- 33346 1. A,. n. of miwp 0111 B. Mndm9 dd( , (d.flerenr lro1n 51- Number nd Sr ee t6�i. MV-1 , ll Planer L.,) X1786 Pen. 9. N... y.° ver bem —;,hd of. lel° ,7 10. No- Too e. .i°loled °ny ql rbe prodfionf of rb AI[oA°li< 01111.11 • r %!f2 .n .n °n.[hmenr C°nn°I A[I o p of rM1e 0epvmem 1--1 1. rho All' -, 11 "YES mer° .e mf 9.. IO .b [F 61 per. be deemed pen of rhN °pplrtmi.n. 12. A pl.< r .qre , l.! F onY m sager mpl°,ed . ,.le h[ fed p .dl M1.v ell If. q..fA— of .1 . l.. e, .ntl Ibl rh°rnb. ..Ilea....else or <..f..r permit to o .i.l.red ony . f .1 If. Al,o1O11 l--- C°nrr.l Aer^1f I rh1 oram..n 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA C.unry of -Prdn fiCrCOShc ILO O.,.6-2375-3 SGN XERE `..rl.Ll,�_ mn.1!ti JX.G /.� r�l //, 'r nrF %'.r. Li_r✓ APPLICANT r L .. to ✓! %��+ APPLICATION RT TRANSTEROR 6-23 8 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA C—,, aI ...... �m�. 0c __r_n__a__r_di_na_________ _______ 3 16 Nomel,l of ll<e sre %111 -•.... • • ,• ar 17 V-1-10 of U11111111) 18. Li[! a Nvmbl,fll VLRI!OLA, tinrj Ann (L.orc// 47-33346 V A00 LA, Pat P. °1,°,149 .PeotF.iiierui:u�elr daneho Cuenm3PL;a lf." )1730 San C"PP,ardino no.Vat W,i,[ 1W.m Th. Llool Fp.Ommrm,m f it 0vl9 Arbdod %T pe[nrded norrtr. F,e.N.n paper,, 6 -23 -83 ❑ ......... ------------------------------ COPIES NAILED ............ ............................... Pene.aL [ee ol..... - -. .ni .. Oold n, ...Z ............ ..........OT<. .. ...... .. eNpr NO •pn ....:...: ... ... N 01 --'-RED MILL COUNTRY CLL'9 T�x.ACe SCCJ1CL SiA: oeL Blue `ZacmJ .� � 1 `• �` \\°°aA.. 6190 JAe \Qw Hlbl `�4� 1P �t o � U oe— -! 40 +° o I 0 50 Nik61L LgmO SuJ� Sig, 46 <.. 4] 48 52 J \ II 53 49 [j 54 G eI I C I C 'O _ �A� aeeuAeo „„o . 3 Flo s 12 LA'PAfq 8241 7L,e AlAc is LAwP SuAl i5 L,,_eD ou o�r�,LL BLao ou -eAr &U-M 5 / De R x. Lao -Fr EAs7- e F VeD IIId 06au72W CL.J, 'Ii2oPed'T'% Cue2 -eOctq z20u,m % e -2 C',,e MAL 'FLa,J ; On vw me2CIRL 5)UV &Dlue _P¢o012rirs �c,uea8 AJO/2r/f C -2 Ch-, 7- C Z - 'S OU71) it -3 w • E� r c -2- Cre.ueQAL 'PZAAi 8 dU4am %Cem'me.&,AL fAsT /Cbnl n+eilC,A( 50u74 /Ay,Wu.w V7 vs,f) WC, sY lc, Lqw el"e/Ae 0 J 10 CIT] OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and'City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Agreement for Amethyst Avenue Street Improvements Attached for Council execution is a three party agreement with the Cucamonga County Water District and Harley Lovitt to construct street improvements on Amethyst Avenue between Lemon and Banyan. The City's portion is just south of the Water District reservoir and covers M.W.D. right -of -way. The project is included in the 1983 -84 Capital Budget. , RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the Agreement for Amethyst Avenue Street Improvements and authorize the Mayor to sign on their behalf. Respectfully submitted, LBH :,7aa Attachment • AGREEMENT FOR AMETHYST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS This Agreement is made and entered into this _ day of 19_ by and between Harley Lovitt ( LOVITT) , the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (CITY), and the CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public agency (DISTRICT), RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY, the DISTRICT and LOVITT desire to mutually participate in the construction of street improvements on Amethyst Avenue; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICT has expressed its willingness to act as lead agency for said construction. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: COVENANTS 1. The DISTRICT shall act as lead agent in contracting and administration of a construction contract for the AMETHYST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS from 539.98 feet north of Lemon Avenue to 396.98 feet south of Banyan Avenue, said improvement as further described in City of Rancho Cucamonga Drawing No. 823. 2. The DISTRICT, CITY and LOVITT agree to share in the cost of improvement in proportion to actual bid amount for said quantities as described in the attached Exhibit "A ". 3. The CITY and LOVITT agree to post funds with the DISTRICT in the amount of said share plus ten percent contingency within thirty (30) days of award of the contract. 4. The Contractor shall be required to obtain a Construction Permit from the CITY prior to commencement of construction and shall perform all work in conformance with the provision of said permit and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. -1- I 5. Each party shall indemnify the other parties and its officers, agents and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts of omissions on its part or on the part of its officers, agents, contractors, and employees in connection with the construction. 6. This Agreement may only be changed with the mutual consent of the parties in the form of written contract amendments. 7. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein are all subject to a successful award of a construction contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as the date first above written. ATTEST: ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By CUCAMMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By: By: Harley Lovitt APPROVED AS i0 FORM PATE JUN 2 21983 nr ��1� nT Ana =NEV FOR RAN'x0 UcAMOKA 041FORNIA • EXHIBIT "A" 0 D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. 1/3 Lump Sum Clearing, Grubbing, Removals and Subgrade preparation. 2. 115 Linear Feet 8" Curb and Gutter 3. 2530 Square Feet 3" F.C. Pavement over 4" Aggregate Base, Including feather to join. ' 4. 600 Square Feet 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk. 5, 1 - 12" wide residential drive approach. 6. Subtract items 9 and 10 from LOVITT portion. CuCA.M011G.A COUNTY 'WATER DISTRICT 1. 1/3 Lump Sum Clearing, Grubbing, Removals and Subgrade preparation. 2. 110 Linear Feet 8" Curb and Gutter. 3. 2420 Square Feet 3" A.L. Pavement over 4" Aggregate Base inccuding feather to join. 4. 770 Square Feet 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk. 5. 1 - 12' wide residential drive approach. 6. 1 - Parkway culvert Std. Drawing No. 305. 7. 1 - Drain Channel. 8. 9. Relocate sprinkler system and vault. Adjust valves and manholes to grade. 10. Relocated sprinkling system. HARLEY LOVITT 1. 1/3 Lump Sum Clearing, Grubbing, Removals and Subgrade preparation. 2. 90 Linear Feet 8" Curb and Gutter. 4" Aggregate Base 3. 2645 Square Feet 3" A.C. Pavement over including feather to join, 4. 450 Square Feet 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk. 5. 1 - 12' wide residential drive approach. 6. 3 - Type L Markers 7, 35 Linear Feet of A.C. Dike. 8. k0fio5unere :xfcee3xxfltxxkxSxxen:clxxp�:t. - 9, 2.5' Plan Check Fee (City of Rancho Cucamonga Fee) 10. 5e Inspection Fee (City of Rancho Cucamonga Fee) 11. 1/3 Lump Sum Engineering and Contract Administration (CCWD Fee) 0 D • I nTMv nn T n wTrvn n " A nenwTO n STAFF REPORT F I2 DATE: July 6, 1983 — 1> ir- TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Hellman Avenue Improvement Agreement for Water and Sewer Improvement Through review of the Hellman Avenue Improvement Plan, the Cucamonga County Water District indicated their desire to include certain master planned sewer and water improvements in the City's contract. The attached agreement details the mechanisms for accomplishing that coordination. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the Agreement for Water and Sewer Improvements in conjunction with Hellman Avenue Street Improvements and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. Respectfully su itted, LBH: as Attachment E • AGREEMENT FOR WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH HELLMAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 19_, by and between the CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public agency (the DISTRICT) and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (the CITY). RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY intends to improve Hellman Avenue and storm drain facilities; and WHEREAS, said construction must be coordinated with certain water and sewer facilities improvements to be owned by the DISTRICT and summarized in Exhibit "A "; and WHEREAS, said water and sewer facilities improvements • will be constructed as bid items under the contract issued by the CITY for the construction of the Hellman Avenue Improvements with the cost thereof to be borne by the DISTRICT. NOW, THEREFORE, IT 15 AGREED AS FOLLOWS: COVENANTS 1. The CITY shall act as lead agent in the administration of the contract for the construction of the water and sewer improvements detailed on Exhibit "A" and shown on Sheets 8 & 9 of 9 of the Hellman Avenue Improvement Plans. 2. The CITY shall coordinate inspection of water and sewer improvements with the DISTRICT. Upon completion of said work, the DISTRICT shall inspect and approve the installation of the water and sewer improvements prior to the acceptance of the work. Upon completion and acceptance of the work, the water and sewer improvements shall become parts of the DISTRICT's water and sewer systems. -I- 10 3. The CITY shall submit to the DISTRICT for approval any change order dealing with water and sewer work shown on plan • sheets 8 & 9. 4. Upon receipt of the bids for the construction of the water and sewer improvements, the CITY shall provide copies of the bids to the DISTRICT for review and approval. 5. The DISTRICT shall deposit with the CITY within 30 days of award of the contract, the amount of the contract bid pertaining to the water and sewer improvements, said improvements as further described in Exhibit A, plus ten percent (10 %) for contingencies. 6. The DISTRICT shall expeditiously review any change orders submitted to the DISTRICT for approval so as not to result in claims for delays in the progress of the work. Any charges resulting from said delay shall be the responsibility of the DISTRICT. 7. Upon completion and acceptance of the contract the CITY shall refund any DISTRICT contingency funds remaining on deposit. . 8. Each party shall indemnify the other party and its officers, agents and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts of omissions on its part or on the part of its officers, agents, contractors, and employees in connection with the construction of the water and sewer facilities. 9. This Agreement may only be changed with the mutual consent of both parties in the form of written contract amendments. 10. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein are all subject to a successful award of a construction contract for the construction of the Hellman Avenue Improvements. -2- 0 • IN WITNESS WHERECF, the parties have executed this Agreement as the date first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By ATTEST: APPROVED AS (0 FORM WE JUN 2 21993 BY CITY �FG?NiY FOR RANDMUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • ATTEST: E CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By -3- HELL,%AN AVENUE SEWER E CI -) � W.O. '2677 . ENGINEER'S ESTI }LaTE (PHASE I) 705.8 L.F. 10" VCP - Sewer 304.5 L.F. 12" VCP - Sewer 6 EA Sewer Manhole 120 L.£. B" C.M.L. & W. - Water 144 L.F. 10" C.M.L. & W. - Water 250 L.F. 12" C.M.L. & W. - Water 1 EA 10" Gate Valve 1 EA B" Gate Valve 3 EA 2" Blow -off Asse=ly EXHIBIT "A" 13 0 • 10 nrmv nc n A win TTn nTTn A Ax.. — A SUBJECT: Alta Loma Park Jogging Track Purchase of decomposed granite (D.G.) for the jogging track at Alta Lama Park exceeded estimates by 30 %. The additional material was needed to return grade along the south fence line that was lowered an average of 10 Estimated cost to remove the fence and reset at grade was $3,000.00. The cost for additional import D.G. was $1600.00. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council authorize the Finance Department to exceed Purchase Order #2430 by $1600.00. Respectfully submi tte , LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER LBH:DL:bc Iy STAFF REPORT Yom. DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager 19 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, city Engieer BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Alta Loma Park Jogging Track Purchase of decomposed granite (D.G.) for the jogging track at Alta Lama Park exceeded estimates by 30 %. The additional material was needed to return grade along the south fence line that was lowered an average of 10 Estimated cost to remove the fence and reset at grade was $3,000.00. The cost for additional import D.G. was $1600.00. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council authorize the Finance Department to exceed Purchase Order #2430 by $1600.00. Respectfully submi tte , LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER LBH:DL:bc Iy • • Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager ,UrAMp,I, c9 Cp G L; I> 1977 1 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 6726 submitted by Quong- Watkins Properties and located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Blvd. Parcel Map 6726 was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on April 8, 1981 for the division of 5.09 acres into 8 parcel for commercial use at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Blvd. On December 8, 1982 Planning Commission approved a revision of the Parcel Map from 8 parcels to 10 parcels. Quong - Watkins Properties is submitting the Parcel Map to City Council for final approval. Street improvements will be constructed at time of building permit issuance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 6726 and authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign same and forward to County Recorder. ully submitted, BH:BK:jaa Attachments 1� ol P.M. 6726 L4 A LLL ll�-1 LDIIL�' L- JLJ, w U,L' ti • RESOLUTION NO. * I I -10 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6726 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6726) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6726, submitted by Quong- Watkins Properties and consisting of 10 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue a Foothill Boulevard, being a division of a portion of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, T1S, R7W, SBM, in the City or Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, per map of Cucamonga Lands, Map Book 4, Page 9 was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6726 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 6726 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present to the • County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. 'Aa sserman, City Clerk Is it Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor • • I CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician O G�CAM0YC >C'19 sn z 1977 1 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement submitted by Lightner Development Company (Litco) for Tract 10491 and release of Bonds and Agreement previously submitted for said Tract by Eastwood Homes, Ltd. Tract 10491 was approved by Planning Commission on November 26, 1980 for the division of 4.78 acres of land into 20 lots located on the southwest corner of Victoria and Ramona Avenues. Bonds and agreement were submitted by Eastwood Homes, Ltd. and acceptance of said bonds and agreement and final approval of Tract 10491 was given by City Council on June 17, 1981. George Lightner of Lightner Development Company has purchased this tract and submitted bonds and an agreement to replace those submitted by Eastwood Homes, Ltd. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the bonds and agreement submitted by Lightner Development Company for Tract 10491 and releasing same submitted by Eastwood Homes, Ltd. Resyectfully submjtted, LBFVK:jaa Attachments �d -9 e TEITATIVE MAP :....E TRACT X10,10491 C iN !NE CRT OF gANCHO LUL]MONL a c SliE.�.l M.0 CO MOMESTE]OC ANSO CIAT'ION AS VE Pr PLOAT ECOPOEO N 900[46 GE MAPS RL PAGE .6.1 THE Ciiv Of P.NCNO COCl.O"L COUNTY OfGSAN E!0 5 5 BE RN.RDINO, 5 TETE Of C >lifORNIL ••du '.a... c._ JUNE. 19TB fPN_C a IN 7t I > l.. • RESOLUTION NO. * Yi- rG A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10491, SUBMITTED BY LIGHTNER DEVELOPER COMPANY AND RELEASING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, SUBMITTED BY EASTWOOD HOMES, LTD. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on July 6, 1983, by Lightner Development Company, Ltd. as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way for Tract 10491 generally located on the southwest corner of Victoria and Ramona Avenues; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, replaces Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security submitted by Eastwood Homes, Ltd., as accepted by City Council on June 17, 1981. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto and hereby release said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by Eastwood Homes, Ltd. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Is Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mike s, Mayor ILI E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 10491 KNO'A ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Litco Homes, a limited partnership hereinafter referred to as the Developer. NITNESSETH: THAT, 14HEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the cenditionally approved suOdivisi on known as Tract 10491; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located at southwes corner of Victoria Street and Ramona Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct a' Developer's expense all improvements described On Pane 6 here. • of within twelve months from the effective data hereof. 2. This agreement shall he effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter previd- ad. 3. The Developer may request an extension Of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions Of this agreement, including the Construction standards, cost estimate , and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects t0 comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time t0 cause said provisions to be met by any lawful Means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and/or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5, the Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Hater District. 6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, ar removal Of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction Of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 1 0 7. ImDrovements edoi red to be constructed shall conform t0 the Standard Crowings and Standard Spec ific at Ions of the Cl ty, and to the InCrovemment Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Enginee-. Said imp r overeats are tabulated on the Construction and 3ond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construc- tion of any transitions or otia, incidental work beyorrj the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface dr a i name. Errors Or omm l ssl on discovered during constructln shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised word due to said plan modifications sh sl be covered by the pro v'. s io ns of this agreement and secured by he surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to Start of wort; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, wits attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other put sance to the area, and to proper not lficat ion of pub! iC uti ii ties and City Departments. failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor, 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to camp fete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in • completion, and to recover all cast and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedica- tion Of the streets and easements In said subldivislon, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or Improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all improvements, herein incorporated on Page 6 , t0 he performed, each of said streets not aCCepted as improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary Street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the Public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. l2. Parkway trees repotted to be planted shall be p l a it ed by the ?eveloper after other improvement work, grading and c1uamip has been Colo le Led . Planting shall be done as pr o v1dCd by 0r din an C in accordance with the planting d i a g an approved by the City Community Develop, Cut Director. The O vet a er shall be resinous ib le for maintaining all trees planted in and health until the end of the guaranteed m 1, nten ante period, nr for one year after planting, whichever IS later, 13. The. Developer is responsible for meeting all cond,- tinn; establ;vheJ by the city pursuant to the Subdivision _2. • 0 Map Act, City Ord i an ces, and this agreement for the de v e l parer t, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is ace anted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided here inwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein na'ed, and by resolution of the City Coupon sere has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The imp r o v em en[ security to be furnished by the Developer With this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: 03 A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties is the form and content specified by Government Code Section 6641 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. 0. To secure laborers and materialmen: 1. A band or bonds by one or more duly authorized • corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney, 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the setting of ail boundary, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as accentable Ceymeat in full; ar, if no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Band Estimate contained herein, Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Oeveloper warrants that the improvements described is this agreement shall be free from defects In me teri l is and wOrkmanSh,p. Any 3n,i all portions of the improve- ments found t0 be defective Wit hn one (l) year following the ,late on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be room red or rep l ar. e it by Developer fr ^e of all charges to the City. The GovaI and r shall farntah a maintenance guarantee 19 security in a stir •`T.tal to ten pa -'cant (10%) of the construction 3- 03 estimate or 5200.00, whichever is oreater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obi igat tons as described in this para- graph, The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any Sol igation of the Developer to d spec if led work with respect to any oarkway maintenance assessment district. Once the imurnvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Drdinance. 17. That the peveloper shall Lake out and maintain such public liability and property don a a insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the wart or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or Subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as addttpnal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less [ha $300,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for each • accident or occurrence, and property damage liabil- ity limits of not less than $100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $250,000 for claims whirr may arise from the Opera- tion[ of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. A. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than 3200,000 for each person and $300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $100,000 which may ar lse from the opera- tions of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the wore provided for herein. 19. That before the eiecution of this agreement, the D"-leper shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellatinns, or reduc Hon t n coverage of any policy pill dances by such cart ifir, ate, before the, expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have race lvod no t if tcati on by registered mail from t.b0 to s o r A.. ca carrier. As e, of nuderst indinq the provisions cant aimed herein, and of Intent to cImply with same, the Suhdivrrler has submitted the foI lnnino desr.rihed improvpme.nt serer ily, and has aff iced his slgniture heretq: _a- • an' E FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Bond Principal Amount; 5160,000.00 Name and address of Surety: :::\tif. ^Fr S ^.,,,,-,ox'; CO„ "I Wtlshirc, MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT 92803 Type: Bond Principal Amount: E 80,000.00 Name and address of surety: d, 333 iii lshirc, ,lrai.c r- G\ 9f803 CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: 5 2,200.00 Name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount; S 16,000.00 Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all • formalities required by llH on the dates Set forth opposite their Signatures L 2: H -ES, r•IA; Pe Date by it to -� �• r c�c ,.ncral Par mer SiAit of Gu,:: t)iz;fA ecLt,—,y oe s,.� mrr_rau:o ss On__ JrnC 15, 1903_- ___pefore me (-I f 1111 a be CSUR-& N. Lxa 41�d _ for pa-:rrl ;r M or. Lv: wols If Batas` actor e+id� 'Fa`r�nllly krgwn to of ' iAO !nls ;, r 1.i! er ; Y 1<cl Cm G�ieral Partrar a. Ne: shsp, arv3 to S Nc pc ^can that oar ted ties r' °�'r' "' t• ='� h` =1��1` of L',e rartmrsh:p an] acknowlcdyt] to re tMt the pm,_ . Ir.P •,x ^cv:rd ;.� as , E. r_ i" u 4 1986 ;.� as : *r n R a e4 ,fi{ iY'r C:'iY OF i:ANCIIO CLC;::J::(,A :'aUCr M; ld1U'U'i ESTDLITE EYCR)Al 2 ENr YE YL FSi: Sc!i!::NLE DATE: n 14" PM 11T ::J. COYAGEtr by C G. 6'PK lair ReL TRact 10491 C;rY Uo,•! 432 9Ui D,,, o :: L:LV u1r 1t for 1111 vnti::U Pe1n([ or Paeesen[ rtpWCe- ('rf.: S'O:PCTA1;: CUYT E5V:'1]'E i = : OM::Ti-.Y Ii::IT UNIT COST 1f.a TOTAL CONS':RUCTION COSTS _160,000 _ FAITIIICI. I'CRI'UY;IAACE DOND (1001) 160,000_ IALO:'. AND !:111 "11.11. BOND 00E) 00:000 G nr (I'I.E SCIIEOULL) NO:0 IloiD (CASII) 2.200 1— 10 . 16.'•lu _,,5 1n 2xu S. z.lD 10 2 «z ..Y. ..0 Inn J EuL n;:F n:r:n I 6.T. itIt list Ar b 1 i-N n:r 67U 45.U0 3D ,C. 11 1 111. Kn. 1o.nD , z . 1 4 n. 20 0. uo of Rea. It I'ii,,iIq lot I r T I I I il I 't EA. SOD, UU I.LCO _ Ora warn Jut; Struct ":n I 2, 00.00 ::.'0 kl'1 knl. IVn .U6 "i 4' Cati.h 0atin I 1 2d' Cdltll 0.H:n L:1. ro • , Stn I f.A. 2 36. UV ul< S:ors Drain d02 L. 48.0 — 64. DO StormUreintlani:;le a�3 CONSTRUCTION COST 137,355 COA1iI:OL1:CY COSTS 22,645 TOTAL CONS':RUCTION COSTS _160,000 _ FAITIIICI. I'CRI'UY;IAACE DOND (1001) 160,000_ IALO:'. AND !:111 "11.11. BOND 00E) 00:000 ILSPILTION FEE (I'I.E SCIIEOULL) NO:0 IloiD (CASII) 2.200 Page 6 r -I L II 'I il'I i, Is f.lr:A). III: /II W,m ;n. 10598' . VRIM7171: 51,680.00 FAi T"Fr L PERF ^RIARCE BOND WHEREAS, the Building and Safety Division of the City of gaucho Cucamonga, State of California, and Ll= H(BM_ , a Limited Pe rmorship (hereinafter designated as "principal') have entered into a n agreement wherehv principal agrees to install and c replete certain desigtnrted improvements, which said iV,oment, dated . 19 and identified as urn, err P act 10491— LftCV gQ.TS, n Limited Pa[[no[sD in A11 -h i'r rat fm _ /,/ tnc }Y ray Att,ch so pa r n ie ju r at pb 1 Oha.M.ifJCEPS SA'SUP:SKT. CYYA'N!Y ___ caps of company pre. r of ( Sure, -. Artmnry drsignattrnnu In fo.r heir. /, •� Ire __4- �; "1`- ^i -l•_. f✓;', /C; ,l�,r,ln is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to formal, a bond far the faithful performance of said agreement. NOI/, THEREFORE, ve the principal and Op—XPERS a rSLRWt1: (DAyPkY surety, are held and £truly bound the City of Rancho C _ - - - aaf<ec called "City "), in he penal s oft Iim,dted Sixty TtiI. red sd 0o /100 Doliars (5160,000.00 - - -) is.- fu�l m ney of the United States, for the payment ofof which sum veil and truly to be made, ve bind ourselves, o r heirs, successors, executors and administrators, • jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The traditional this obligation is such that If the above bounded principal, his or its halts, a x cutors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall In all things stand In old abide by. and all and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and airs, alteration thereof made as therein prow Wed, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and to the antrear therein specified, and in all respects s e rdir, to their live intent and meaning. and shall indemnify and s ve harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and rennin in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall he included costs and reasonable capentes and fees, tool, ding reasonable oltt cy's feel, incurred by City in successfully rnforc ing inch obliga[SOn, all to be taxed as costa and included in any judgement remJ e, ed. k The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that n change, extension of time, alteration o addition to the terms of the agreement or to thew x to be per- formed thrre order or the specifications accompanying the s shall in aawtee nffrca its rblip:,tirns no this bond, and It does hereby waive notice of any such chanRa, eatensfnn of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the ag,'rrment or to the work nr he c,,iflestions. IN a1TDF:SS MMU,Ir, this Snstru�.ent has been duly executed by the principal gad surety nb,r ve aan•d, o S,me 15th, 19 e03. LftCV gQ.TS, n Limited Pa[[no[sD in A11 -h i'r rat fm _ /,/ tnc }Y ray Att,ch so pa r n ie ju r at pb 1 Oha.M.ifJCEPS SA'SUP:SKT. CYYA'N!Y ___ caps of company pre. r of ( Sure, -. Artmnry drsignattrnnu In fo.r heir. /, •� Ire __4- �; "1`- ^i -l•_. f✓;', /C; ,l�,r,ln PEPV�s BOA ::0. in_ ^;Il . • L;nos AND > TEPIA'MEN ❑OND W%ZPCAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and L *'aTJ HOMES, a L ,'•:ted Pa''tc;.nshiu (hereinafter designated ai "print ipal" j have sereiea !nto an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and comolete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreerent, dated 19 _, and identified as pro- ject Troy t 10491 1s hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City at Rancho Cut, aonua to s cure the claims to which reference is made in Title 13 (co•.mencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, TNEP.EFORS, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material - men and other persons employed in tie performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of F'i ,4 .—A ,>rd,­_p0 Dollars 1 gQ�pp,lryp "---" or mater :a� furnishea or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond Shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and cerporationc entitled to file claims end, Title 15 (tormenting with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Cade, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, lien this obligation shall become null and void, oLhcrwise it shall be and :.main in full force and effect, The surety hereby stipulator, and agrees that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said a'rerOuu- or the spaeifications accompanying the same shall in any rains affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here - by waive notice of any such change, . %tension, alteration or ad- dition. IN W17:11;55 MWPEOF, this instrument has been duly execcted by thv pnncipnl and surety above named, on .i:me 15th 19 n 61 5 li'. fi;�, a Ia siLN i sr'r rshtp DL'CI:11Trju1 L`8 /l11X %K7 CCt T'%W I'y /R\` �' n'(: �A"1/�• /1( —i _�iJ _._A .i / �tcltmr, d. , pintK,lo dtcom.' ; -m -:ace RCE24 ^ 0 • Is n TMv nc n A XTr TJn nT 1n A %ri %— . STAFF REPORT Cil DATE: July 6, 1983 T0: City Council and City Manager 977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 7963 and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Barton Development Co, and located at the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd, and Haven Ave. Parcel Map 7963 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on May 11, 1983, for the division of 13.22 acres of land into 3 parcels within Subarea 17 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Haven Avenue. Barton Development Company has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of a median island on Haven Avenue. Street improvements on Haven Avenue, Foothill Blvd. and Aspen Avenue with the exception of sidewalk and drive approaches have been constructed. The sidewalk and drive approaches will be contructed prior to issuance of building permit. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 7963 and the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. Respectfully submitted, LBH 8.K:ja%` Attachments 2q •1 • � wn tuw-%,�Zp - - - - - - - - - - - - - - cD ............ _JL IL - -- ---------- CITY 01; R ANO 10 (,UCAN I0,NGA A LNGINEFRING Dl%'ISION VICINITY NIAP I N page TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N&7963 a.Y�A Kw Cab. WuNly, u�Fo 31 0 • • • RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7963 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7963) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7963, submitted by Barton Development Company and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, being a division of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 6725, recorded in Book 67 of Parcel Maps, pages 4 -7 records of San Bernardino County, California was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 7963 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 7963 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present to the County Recorder to be filed for record. • PAsSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk E Jon D. Mike s, Mayor 2 11� 7 RESOLUTION NO. * y '— / U A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM BARTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR PARCEL MAP 7963 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7963, located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, submitted by Barton Development Company was approved on July 6, 1983; and WHEREAS, Installation of a landscaped median island established as prerequisite to recordation of Parcel Map 7963 has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Barton Development Company. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor • RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ,_ day of 19 by and between Bocc:tpp E. Bnrtcn NC pYis}ttNCN!>;E ii?ift9Aj (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'City "), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the recordation of Parcel Map 7963,an industrial subdivision the City • requires the construction of missing off-site street improvement including one -half landscaped median island adjacent to the Property to be developed; and Ul WHEREAS, the 9eveloper's desire In postpone construction c such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City is agr o e a b le to such postponement provided that the Developer enter into this Agreement requiring the Developer to constrict said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fail or neglnct to do so that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: L ._ ? Ia 0 1. The Developer hereby agree that they aiII install off -site street improvements including ore -half landscaped ^iedian i s and im accordance and co'rpllance with all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and rec.lations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said improvements shall be installed upon and along end adjacent to Parcel vap 7963 on Haven Avenue. 2. The installation of said improvements sh a'.1 be completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Instal let ion of said improvments sna11 be at no expense to the City, 3. 1 the event the Developer fail or refuse to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely • manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Devolooer written notice of its intent inn to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be eepended by City in completing said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described real property Situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernard +on, Stet^. of California, to -wit: Parcels 1, 2, and 3 of Parcel Nap 7963 as recorded in Book Pages Official Records of San Bernardino Codna, Tlate of M if'avirnla. 2 LJ 0 5. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes described above. b. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all Of the acts and things by them to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it Shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. B. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement o> a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall be "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the the Civil Cade of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortages on real property, 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to for e ci n5e the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shalt be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. I 3 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. • B. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement o> a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall be "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the the Civil Cade of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortages on real property, 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to for e ci n5e the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shalt be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. I 3 IN WITNESS 'AHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY DEVELOPER CITY OF .RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: �ll.J�1i\�11 eon u. - ens Mayor APPEED AS FFCR'A ATTEST: ^n[ JON NATRR3 Lauren M. Wasserman p1E `w`xtr r•' City Clerk keaare as +'rra :µvawalt ........: «+. «... a .........,. +. «....... x.,,» w w «....,r...... u.. STATE OF EALIF0 911 ) ) Ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) On ,19 ,before me the undersigned Notary Puolic, personally appeared JO.N D. MIKELS, personal ly known to me to be the Mayor of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me • to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipai corporation, and aCknowled ged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) !r? VN•4 !�3 ,19` ,before the underSigned Nlit'ary Py in personally appeared , •,.F• �5.� -i - -�_ known to me t. 5e twe person sl whose name -(S1 Subscribed to the within instrument and ac k now l e q0d IhJL � -_ executed it. AND OFFICIAL SEAS. j .:' U!Ilr lxt lL Al � •,.mr..n.w,w �' -- 'Ipt a..y`SI nature +a C:x.em nc,n wn�lz :eta ,. NOTE :WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTFD BY A CORPORATION OR PAKNERSHIP, THE ABOVE JURAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERSHIP JURAT IS RLQOIRCO. • • .2 n TMv nc n A rTPUn PT TO A Mn?U- A vu a va a•ra+.....� . ................... �O Lv.......v,1rCY STAFF REPORT Ti F DATE: July 6, 1983 �;1 1977 TO: City Council and'City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bonds Tracts 9267, 9268, & 9269 - Located generally West of Archibald and North of Banyan Release of Cash Staking Deposit L.D. King, Inc. $1,335.14 Steven Sanberg $5,964.86 The County of San Bernardino has requested that City Council authorize release of the staking deposit for the above referenced tracts. All final monuments have been set and upon release, $1,335.14 will be paid to L.D. King, Inc, which will be full payment of monies due the Engineer. The remaining monies will be refunded to Steven H. Sanbery. Tracts 9267 and 9268 - Located generally West of Archibald and North of Banyan Faithful Performance Bonds (Road) Tract No. 9267 $88,000 Tract No. 9268 $136,000 The road improvements for Tract No. 9267 and Tract No. 9268 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. Tract No. 9436 - Located generally South of Victoria and East of Haven OWNER: Crismar Homes P.O. Box 2131 Santa Monica, CA 90406 Maintenance Guarantee Bond $5,300.00 The one year maintenance period on Tract No. 9436 has concluded and a final inspection of off -site improvements has been made. It is recommended that City Council authorize the release of the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. City Council Staff Report Re: Release of Bonds July 6, 1983 Page 2 Tract 9637 - Located generally East of Amethyst and North of Lemon OWNER: Crismar Homes P.O. Box 2131 Santa Monica, CA 90406 Acceptance of: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $10,000 Release of; Faithful Performance Bond $200,000 The road improvements for Tract No. 9637 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that City Council accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, accept the improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. Parcel Map 5922 - located generally South of 19th Street and East of Jasper OWNER: Robert E. Bowdoin • 3631 N. Canon Boulevard Altadena. California 91001 Release of; Faithful Performance Bond $48,513.02 The road improvements for Parcel Map 5922 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. Respectfully submitted,,,��jj�� V LLOY'7B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER 39 • • RESOLUTION NO. * S 3?-1t k r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 9267 AND 9268, TRACT 9637 AND PARCEL MAP 5922 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 9267 and 9268 located generally west of Archibald and north of Banyan and Tract 9637 located generally east of Amethyst and north of Lemon and Parcel Map 5922 located generally south of 19th Street and east of Jasper have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: • NOES: U ABSENT: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. 'Wasserman, City Clerk 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office 9.9 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE of COMPLETION NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tracts 9267 It 9268 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 6th day of July, 1983, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tracts 9267 It 9268 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as o whole was: Mark III Homes 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Generally located west of Archibald and north of Banyan The street address of said property is: N/A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date: � - --TMike S,TMdye REC09DING REQUESTED BY 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Be. 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9173C NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN THAT; 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature Of which interest or estate is: Tract 9637 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Be" Line Road, post Office Box 807, Rancho • Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 6th day of July, 1903, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tract 9637 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Crlsmaf Homes 6. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernard{no, California, and Is described as follows: Generally located east of Amethyst and north of Lemon The street address of said property is: n1a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date: _ - Jon M,kels, Mayor • 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 "EN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN THAT: I. The undersigned i5 an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature Of which interest or estate is: Parcel Map 5922 • 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Past Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, 3. On the 6th day of July, 1993, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work or improvement set forth n the Contract documents for: Parcel Map 5922 a. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Robert E. Sowdoin 5. The real property referred to herein is sftuated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Generally located south of 19th Street and east of Jasper The street address of said property is: n7a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner don Mike ss, -Mayor t� d3 0 • I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner �� GuGMONC's EI $ 2 1977 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACTS 12316 -1 AND 12317 -1 - LEWIS - Approval of Agreement for construction of mode omes prior to final subdivision map recordation. SUMMARY: On May 25, 1983, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tracts 12316 -1 and 12317 -1 with conditions requiring certain improvements (e.g., streets, sewers, drainage, etc.) pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act. Lewis Homes is requesting that the City Council expedite construction of the model homes prior to recordation of the final map through approval of the attached agreement. This will allow the developer to take advantage of the current upswing in the housing market. The City Attorney and staff recommend approval of the attached agreement. ANALYSIS: The proposed agreement would be recorded prior to issuance of building permits and remain as an encumherance on the property until all conditions of the agreement have been fully complied with. The main provisions of the agreement deal with ensuring construction of streets, grading, utilities and landscaping necessary for the model homes. Occupancy of the model homes will not be given until the final map has been recorded. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended approve the attached agreement. Res ect ul lyr�suhmitted, Rick oriel City lanner AG /DC /kep Attachments: Tract Map 12316 -1 Tract Map 12317 -1 Letter from Lewis Homes Agreement L14 that the City Council review and A TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 12316-1 '-T IN THE CITY OF HANCOG CUCAMON04 COU'TY OF SA.4 BERNARDINO ITATL OF CA"FORNIA L77� TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12517-1 T'll T 111 ITV F al C I10 C ICAnO-ICA A SIR VARDI.O STATE OF CALIFORNIA A C Wj x Z W wl A, �i A. AZ Si S17FIlITMITIM.- • • • �i iii • ?D LEWIS HOMES i+se Ncnh moumor, Avenue , PO. Bo. 670 ' Upbnd. CA A +b Sid 971 - N f CEP t. June 10, 1983 1.3 163 �;18igit0ill ��2'3 -k *16 9 Mr. Dan Coleman Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Agreement for Construction of Models Tentative Tracts 12317 -1 and 12316 -1 Dear Dan: Enclosed is the Agreement concerning our starting the model homes in Tentative Tracts 12317 -1 and 12316 -1 before recordation of the final subdivision maps. This includes the changes requested by Bob Dougherty when he reviewed • tho Agreement on May 25. Our attorney has also added some boilerplate. We have executed the Agreement and attached the legal descriptions. As you know, we and other developers have used this approach under similar circumstances in other cities. From our discussions with you, Rick Gor,,ez, Mike Vairin, and Lloyd Hubbs over the past several weeks, everything appears to be in order. At Lloyd's request, I am working out the details of the bonding with Jerry Grant. We would very much appreciate your submitting this Agreement to the City Council for their consideration as a consent calendar item at the July 6 Council meeting, three weeks from now. Favorable Council action on July 6 will allow us to proceed as scheduled. Thank you vary much for your assistance. Cordially, �' } a l/ t T - ,-L Kay Project Manager /km cc w /enc: Dob Doughetb/ Deverly Authelet LII RECORDIUG REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TD: LE'dIS HWES Post Office Box 670 Upland, CA 91136 -0670 Attn: General Counsel AGREEMENT THIS AGREud ENT is made and entered into effective 1983, by and between LE141S HOLIES OF CALIFORHIA ("Developer"), a general partnership, LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. ( "Landowner "), a general partnership, and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal corporation ( "City "). R E C I T A L S A. Landowner is the owner of record of certain real property located in the City (the "Property "), as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. u B. Developer has, with the consent of Landowner, undertaken subdivision of portions of the Property as Tentative Tract Nos. 12316 -1 and 1231' -1 (the "Tracts "), as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Developer has obtained approval of the Tentative Tract (taps by the City and proposes to acquire and develop this property in single family residential use. C. Developer desires to construct the model homes for the Tracts, and • associated improvements, prior to recordation of the final subdivision maps for the Tracts. D. The City wishes to permit such construction, provided that the public health, safety, and welfare are not adversely affected, and provided that the City has adequate security that the ultimate subdivision and development of the Tracts will be completed, or that otherwise the property will be restored to its original condition. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that Developer nay construct the model homes for the Tracts, and associated improvements, prior to recorda- tion of the final subdivision maps for the Tracts, provided the following conditions are met: 1. A maximum of four (4) model homes in Tentative Tract 12316 -1 and three (3) model homes in Tentative Tract 12317 -1 nay be constructed prior to final subdivision nap recordation pursuant to this Agreement. 2. All construction and improvements shall be reasonably consistent with the Tentative Tract Maps as approved by the City Planning Commission on May 28, 1983. 3. Developer shall provide to the City Planning Division detailed site plans indicating the homes and improvements to be constructed, • including streets, parking areas, fencing, landscaping, and signs. to S Agreement Page 2 • Such site plans are subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 4. Developer shall provide to the City Engineering Division detailed improvement plans and cost estimates for the public improvements to be constructed. Such plans and estimates are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. Developer shall provide to the City Building and Safety Division architectural plans for the model homes. Such plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official. 6. The improvements shall include construction of streets, and associated landscaping, to provide adequate access to the model homes until the remainder of the street improvements for the Tracts are completed. 7. All improvements for streets, grading, utilities, and drainage shall be constructed to ultimate standards as indicated on the proposed final subdivision naps and the proposed final engineering plans for the Tracts. 8. Developer shall post bond for completion of all improvements to be performed. 9. The City shall issue building permits and other necessary permits for • construction of the homes and improvements, and shall issue notices of completion for the homes when appropriate. However, Developer and Landowner warrant and agree that there shall be no occupancy of any model home until the final subdivision nap for the Tract in which it is located has been recorded. 10. Developer and Landowner warrant and agree that if the final subdivision nap for a Tract is not recorded within two (2) years after building permits are obtained, the model hones in said tract will be demolished or removed, and the property restored to its original condition at Developer's and Landowner's sole cost. Developer shall provide security for removal and /or demolition in the sum of the estimated value of the improvements plus $10,000.00 per house. 11. Developer will provide adequate emergency access, to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District, and adequate fireflow, to the satisfaction of the Cucamonga County Water District. 12. Walls adjacent to Rase Line Road or Haven Avenue shall be constructed to approximately three feet (3') in height pending completion of the final homes in the Tracts. Temporary model area fences will be as indicated on the detailed site plans. All other walls and fences will be installed to permanent standards. 13. Developer shall perform and bond for maintenance of all public land - scaped areas until formation of the landscape maintenance organization as conditioned on the Tentative Tract Maps. Agreement Page 3 14. This Agreement, or a memorandum thereof, in a form acceptable to the parties hereto, shall be recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino prior to issuance of building permits. • 15. promptly after recordation of the final nap or restoration of the property under Paragraph SO of this Agreement, the City shall furnish Developer with a Certificate(s) of Compliance in a fora suitable for recording upon request by Developer. Such Certificate of Compliance shall he, and shall so state, conclusive determination of satisfaction of the covenants and conditions required by this Agreement, and full co�pliance with the terms hereof. After issuance of such Certificate of Compliance, any party then owning or thereafter purchasing, leasing, or otherwise acquiring any interest in that part of the Property for which a Certificate of Compliance has been issued shall not incur any further obligation or liability under this Agreement, and shall be thereafter released from any covenants, conditions, or restrictions herein contained. 16. Should any party bring suit to enforce any provision of this Agreement or clain arising therefrom, the successful party in such proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees and any judgment awarded shall include same. 17. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. 16. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement • effective on the day and year first above written. "Developer" "Landowner" LEWIS HOMES OF CAVI`P1RNIA, LEl1IS DEVELOPMENT CO , a general partner hi a eneral 9 partnership i By' By: N s Au Lh vriZ Agent Its Authorized ent "City" CITY OF RANCHO CUMVIGA, a Municipal Corporation ATTEST: By : City Ila nu ger City tto rney • �;7 Ag reerien t Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On June 10 , 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary P 71ic in and for said State, personally appeared Richard A. Lewis personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi- dence) to be the person who executed the within instrument as the agent of LEIIIS HO >IES OF CALIFORNIA, the partnership that executed the within instru- ment and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership and that said partnership executed the same. WITNESS my hand and office seal. �rriclnr. I: Ar: g C /y�_n ,� �J�r���` MA A. ROBINSON Si nature lX p(� sAx ec nn,mm�o counrr Edna A. Robinson My COmm¢siw FSpaesMU. U. 1981 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On .line 10 , 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Richard A. Lewis personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi- dence) to be the person who executed the within instrument as the agent of • LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO., the partnership that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership and that said partnership executed the sane. WITNESS my hand and officialese 1 UY,'I f,IAL SY. AI- 9 GGd7' — ^ r // EDNA A. ROBINSON Signature iU re (�1� iC QPMY o� + +c euc c.mn sex r Edw d. Robinson n Cam mus.on,pwsMn.1.1987 Typed (Jame ..., .x����o..� � ». ». ............ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN SERNAROINO ) On , 1933, before lie, the undersigned, a Rotary Public in and for said State, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi- dence) to be the person who executed the within instrument as of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a runicipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. WITNESS ny hand and official seal. Signature Typed Name 903/c 061033 5( EXHIBIT "A" 0= -3 nTRT'ON: T ^E LAND - -'ERRED TO HEREIN TS 317,'HTFD iii TY. OvLIFiT OF AN SEni'i-1FDiN& STATE OF CALIFOFNIA: AND TS GE:S r:RiSED AS FOLLOWS PARCEL NO, 1 ^ • T.:AT FOFTTON OF LOT 1. AS :SHOWN ON 7FACT N0. f• IN T'H'E C,17" OF RANC40 CIICH;I %iNGA, COUNT'V OF SAN EEPHAFDINO: STATE O CALIFORNIA: AS PER MP _CO Eli IN 600K 34-OF MAPS '-'ALES 67 111'40 r.7-1•'- 1N' THE OFF ICE Or`- Tn'E COUi Ti' FECOROER OF SAID COUNTY, 4NE, THAT PORTION CIF ECTIOU L TONASHIP 1 SOUTH: FANLE 7 WEST: SAN BERNARDINO MEFiDIAPi. AS $HO:di: !lit CUCHMC -'uA FRUIT LAND COMPANY'S = J(E'Dil ST!1 h1: AS PER MAP FECDFSEO Iii ECOK 4 OF fir'.F'S: PAGE = IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COMM. AND FLIF,'THER DEE3CRiEED AS FOLLOWS: - EGifliilNG AT THE NCRTHiiEST CORNER OF SAID SECT Ohl I; THEiiCE EA:3 ERL'V 240.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE DEPARTING F.RC%N -AIO LINE AND AT RIGHT ANGLES THERETO A DISTANCE OF 544. FEET; THENCE SO,JTH - DEGREES 37 MINUTES SECONDS WEST 50.00 FEET.; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 37 iiINUTEES 36 SECONDS !TEST ?70,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 7 DEGREES OF NITNUTES 36 -SECONDS NEST 127.40 FEET TO THE 8EGZNllj -NG OF A CUF+. %E CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH: HA!QlNi, N RADIUS OF 630,00 FEET: A RADIAL LINE FROM SAID BEGINNING OF NON- TANGEi:T CUF'VE 'EARS SOUTH T1 DEGREES 50 MUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, E'ASTERL'Y ALONG SAM CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL PNGLE OF 31 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 51' SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3511.46 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY TANGcNT TO SAID CUF.VE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 155.'8'0 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CUR.!'E: CONCAUE TO THE EAST, riAUING A RADIUS OF 1200.00 FEET; A F.'ADIAL LINE FROM SAID BEGINNING OF NON - TANGENT CURVE SEARS • SOUTH - DEGREES 26 MHUTES SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG ..S."1D CL %n!lE iFn!IUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 311 0EGnc'cS - iiili!lTES 57 SECONDS: Ah! Ah'C OT STAi;CF OF 658.32 FEET; THENCE nEPAFIIING FFOi1 SAID CURVE ON A RADIAL SEARING OF SOUTH SO DEGREES OF n1iNU7ES 36 SECONDS NEST A 0137ANCE OF 3411.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 24 SE i.01iDS EAST 1 "4T OO FEET THENCE SOUTH 76� DEGREES 3;' rMINUTEES 36 SECOND• WEST 60190 FEET: THENCE NORTH 2S DEGREES 22 i9iNUTES 24 SECONDS NEST -111 0!1 rEE THENCE NORTH 64 DEGREES Cie 1'IIHUTES 24 SECONDS r4E8 5,0. DO FEET: THENCE NORTH 22 DEGREES. L17 MIiiLITES 24 SECONDS NEST 5SO. 1-10 FELT; THENCE NORTH 3-1 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 24 SE "!ANDS WEST 140.00 FEET; TH NCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 52 HINUTEI= 24 SECONDS WEST 300.00 FEET.; THENCE 3011TH '? DEGREES 5` MINLITES 36 SECONDS WEST 27130- FEET: THENCE SOUTH 24 DECREE= i•iINUTES 42 -ECONO$ WEST 17174 FEET; TD THE BEGINNING OF A TA.i1GE1111 CURVE CO CW-1E TO THE rAi'RTHI•iEST: HAUTNG A RADIUS OF 23e•O.Of) FEET; THENCE SOUTHNESTEEFL'i ALONG SAID TAi1GEN7 CURVE: THROUGH A CE,°1TRAL AI:GL= OF - OEGREEc• 36 1•IThiUiES 50 SECONDS: AN ARC 01STANCE OF 42 ?. FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TWKENT CURE COHCAI!E TO THE SOUTH., nAVIiIG A FALLS OF 45.00 FEET: A FADTAL LME FPC',l 'SAID FEGTON! ?<G OF ti 110 ri- TAriGCii7 CU! VE SEARS NORTH 75 DEGRREE'= MINUTE T 'i EC!1i.; 1•: EAS• THENCE iiESTERL'! ALONG SAID NOU- TANGENT CGF.VE: THFOUGn A CEiITRAL .41iGLE OF DEbFEE'- 30 MINI.ITES' SECONDS AN AFC 0I$TANCE OF FEET. T.,E•'i ^E NE3TE.S'L1': ALONG FATE) HON- TANGENT CURVE: iHRI'UGq A�CEii7RAL Af16LE OF ' c DE„SEES 50 HINES - ;ECON0E AN AFC DISTAN OF �;? FEET THEiUE NESTERLn TANGENT TO SAiO CLIRI!` SOUTH o? DEGREES 57 mm um 00 SECOiinS uEST 147.00 FEET TO A POINT iN THE WEST LINE OF • FACE .?3 817821 -J a- TiOH !. :: =•AID POINT SE i;lG :50;^ -H O DEGFEES 0.- "181ITES ;'0 S' & :0riG F%Ei — -1 .i0 0$ Fa- EPFRON THE ;OUTAi4E.ST =n"NER OF SA10 SECTION' rH&,,Cc �ORTHE "LV iLIiiL >•AILi i-E3T LIiiE TO THE�TPUc' POINT OF �-EGi NFfi iiG, ESiCE ?Ti ?r':. T ^EREFRC:ii THE HESTERLY 1O1.00 FEET AND TiiE PsIOST NOFTHE: :LV ALSO E :,XEPTPh; THAT POP71OrV J_llr`jVc'IC:J TO 7HE 1_OUI'TV OF SA!i - tif1!FLr I :I: e'.' DEED RECOF.DED ,JULY IS. 1973 IN BOOK =223 PAGE 105- OFFiCTAL RECOFOS. ALSO -':Cc T THAT PORTION L'ONVEi'ED TO ME SAM e "'c "r.'IiriRDiidO COUHT+' FLOOD C;�riLiO! DISTRICT SY DEED RECORDED MARCH 24, 1 ?i2 A; iNSTFUM HT 10. 8205014. EM PT MEREFFON ALL OIL, GAS, PIINEFALS, H'IDROCAFECH AND KIH0r'ED SUBSTANCES LYING B LON A DEPTH OF 50;7 FEET, BUT HIT.tiOUT THE =IGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY, AS GRANTED TO NESTERH SUPPLY CORF. BY DEED RECORDED SEPT Ei9FER !;', i -' :? iN BOOK 9772 RAGc' 12e2 OFFICIAL RECORDS, • • 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15' 16' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 EXHI13IT "H" TRACT NJ. i2316 -1 THAT PORTION' OF LOT 1, AS SHOWN ON TRACT 140. 22,2, IN THE CITY C.' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BER.NARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOON 34 OF -MAPS, PAGES 67 AND 67 -1 /2, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AND THAT PORTION OF SECTION' 1, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIOIA.N, AS SHOWN ON CUCANOHGA FRUIT LAND COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, OF MAPS, PAGE 9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OFF SAID SECTION 1, SAID COR.:ER BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BASELINE ROAD AND THE CENTERLINE OF HAVEN AVENUE; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION' 1 AND SAID CENTERLINE OF BASELINE ROAD. SOUTH 89° 55' 42" EAST 595.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 04' 18" WEST 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINIG; THENCE SOUTH 0° 04' 18" WEST 573.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89" 55' 42" EAST 155.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 04' 18" EAST 98.99 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING TH� BEGINNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 62.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 5° 34' 51" NEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21° O1' 49" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 22.94 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 74' 33' 02" EAST 43.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 97.50 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15° 31' 16" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 26.41 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 89° 55' 42" EAST 3.92 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 0° 04' 18" EAST 45.00 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THI. RU ?INNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4::.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 0° 04' 18" EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1° 31' 39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 11.26 FEET TO A POINT, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID 5`2/ • E it 1 I POINT REARS NORTH 1° 35' 57" EAST; THENCE NORTH O° 04' 18" EAST 2 100.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05° 54' 17" EAST, 120.00 FEET; THENCE 3i SOUTH 74° 12' 39" EAST 69.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65° 02' 18" EAST 4 j 149.00 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NO:. 1 5 TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 777.50 6 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BUMS NORT.R 7 64° 40. 12" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THRO":CE A 8 CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3° 04' 52" AN ABC DISTANCE OF 41.81 FEET TO A 9 POINT, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 1O 61` 35' 20" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 65° 02' 18" EAST 107.92 FEET TO 111 THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN PARCEL A OF THE I 12 DEED TO THE SA% BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RECORDED 131 MARCH 24, 1982 AS DOCUN,ENT NO. 82- 056914 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, 141 RECORDS OF SAIL COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID 15 PARCEL A AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 24" 57' 42" EAST 398.39 PEET; NORTH 16 29° 55' 44" WEST 52.64 FEET AND NORTH 0° 04' 18" EAST 3.04 FERT 171 TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 18 AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 191 ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE. NORTH 99° 55' 42" WEST 640,68 FEET TO I 20i THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. zl z2 23 5/31/R3 24 JRD 25 126 -669-5 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 J 1 2 3 5 5 fi 7 8 9 10 11 12' 13 141 is 161 17 181 19 20' I 21 22 23I 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 TRACT NO. 12317 -1 THAT PORTION OF LOT 1, AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 220:, IN THE CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN HOOK 34 OF MAPS, PAGES 67 AND 67 -1/2, IV THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AND THAT PORTION OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BHRNARDINO MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN ON CUCAMONGA FRUIT LAND COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION' AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1, SAID CORNER BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BASELINE ROAD AND THE CENTERLINE OF HAVEN AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF HAVEN AVENUE SOUTH 0° 06' 08" EAST 1137.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 53' 52" EAST 101.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89° 53' 52" EAST 117.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH D° 06' 08" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89" 53' 52" EAST 459.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19° 50' 44" WEST 199.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65° 02' 18" EASI 90.86 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 777.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POP,:T BEARS SOUTH 69° 10' 37" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH • CENTRAL A IMS OF 1° 14' 27" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 16.84 FEET TO • POINT, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 70' 25' D4" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 70° 25' 04" EAST 45.00 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 822.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 70° 25' 04" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0° 41' 06" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9.03 FEET TO A POINT, A RADIAL. LINK. OF SAID CURVH TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 69° 43' 58" EAST; THENCE: SOUTH 65° 02' 18" E)ST 109.26 FELT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE SAN SERNARDINO • E 1 2 3' 41 5'I 61 71 8 9 30 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL. DISTRICT RECORDED VURC11 24, 1982 AS DOCUMENT NO. 82-056914 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 24° 57' 42" WEST 53.84 FEET; SOUTH 27° 20' 09" WEST 49.97 FEET; AND SOUTH 25 °02'31" WEST 265.23 FEET; TNENCE NORTH 64° 57' 29" WEST 425.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57° 29' 52" WEST 119.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 53'52" WEST 90.00 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE OF HAVEN AVENUE AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 0° 06' 08" WEST 375.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 5/31/83 JRD 126 -670 -5 5l i 7 .II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 24, 1983 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager' SUBJECT: Service Recognition Awards- Eligibility Requirements The attached represents a City Council consensus regarding the service recognition awards program. As you will recall, the City Council directed staff to go ahead and purchase the service award pins, but to draft recommendations for the City Council regarding a consensus as to who should receive the pins and on what basis. Staff intends to place this item on the July 6, 1983 City Council agenda for your consideration. If you have any objections, comments, or additional direction for staff, please let us know as soon as possible. Thank you for your assistance in arriving at a consensus on the service recognition awards program. JR:mk Attachment 54 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 21, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: James H. Robinson, Assistant City Manager BY: Robert A. Rizzo, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Service Recognition Awards - Eligibility Requirements Listed below are the three categories in which a person can qualify for a city service recognition award (as compiled from City Council consensus). The minimum service period is five years with additional recognition in increments of five years (i.e., 10, 15, 20, etc.). JHR:RAR:mk 1. City Employee - five consecutive years' service with City of Rancho Cucamonga as full -time employee with permanent status. 2. Elected Officials - five consecutive years' service with City in elected or appointed capacity (i.e., 3 year commissioner and 2 year City Council = 5 years service). 3• Commissioners /committee members - any commtis- sioner /committee member appointed by City Council who serves five consecutive years and attends a minimum of forty (40) commission /committee meetings. 59 0 r 1 U 10 CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager z � � Z 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 7891, Bonds and Agreement and Lien Agreement submitted by Herbert Hawkins, Inc, and located on the south side of Foothill Blvd. approximately 250 feet east of Turner Avenue Parcel Map 7891 was approved by Planning Commission on May 25, 1983 for the division of 2.9 acres into 2 parcels within the C -2 zone. Herbert Hawkins, Inc., owner, has submitted bonds and agreement in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $ 41,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $20,500.00 A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement has also been submitted for the future construction of a median island on Foothill Blvd. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 7891, Bonds and Agreement and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. Respectfully submitted, LBH:B :jaa Attachments CITY OF RANCHO COCA \10 \G.\ o, ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY NIAP A N t it le; page p /t 7 n • RESOLUTION NO. * S � � A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7891, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7891), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7891, submitted by Herbert Hawkins, Inc., and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, 250 ± east of Turner Avenue, being a division of a portion of Parcel 2, Parcel flap 7666 as recorded in Book 80, pages 10 -11 of Parcel Map Book, County of San Bernardino, State of California was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 25, 1983; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7891 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite :to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Herbert Hawkins as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 7891 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor � a. • RESOLUTION NO. * % A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM HERBERT HAWKINS INC., FOR PARCEL MAP 7891 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7891, located on the south side of Foothill, 250 S east of Turner Avenue, submitted by Herbert Hawkins Inc. was approved on May 25, 1983; and WHEREAS, Installation of a landscaped median island established as prerequisite to recordation of Parcel Map 7891 has been met by entry into a Real Property 1 ;.,provement Contract and Lien Agreement by Herbert Hawkins Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. . AYES: NOES: 19 ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 7391 _ KNO'A ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in performance with the Provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancno Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr- ed to as the City, by and between said City and Herb cot "avY.i re rp., Too. hereinafter referred to as the Oeve opera THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer Cesirss to develop certain real property in said City locate tl soutF. side c: Foochall ❑oul =_yard T - ^r Avrlu and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting Of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pu roo se of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1, The Developer hereby agrees to construct at . developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution Of the Coun oil of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time bas been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of Circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera - tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, Cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto ahem warranted by substantial Changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the prov,sions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to he completed by any law- ful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Bevel. oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full can Pill "a with the requl atilins Contained thoreln. Nen-Compli Once may result In Stop p, I Of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right -of -way improvement work required shall be cunstructrd in conformaric, with approved improvement plans, Standurd Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special -I- S.F., D.R., Res., P.M.,CUP t+•• L- 41 0 amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /ar oth a incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or ommissi ors discovered during construc- tion shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer, devised work due to said plan nodifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Work done within existing streets shall he diligent- ly pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cast and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. S. The Developer shall be responsible for rep l acme,,, relocations, or removal of any component of any irri gat ion water system in conflict with the required 'xork to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and idintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development D'. rector. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be suoject to the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: • .Z- • 0 • Is FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type• p•ineipi, Fnocnt: $;I, 000.00 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Amount: S2),500.00 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONIIME91"ATION Type: Principal „ -ou n;: y/. Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN 91TNESS HEREOF, the panties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknceledge eith all fornalities required by lad on the da3hs set for .h� y�—Jposit- their signatures, Date 6JH9J9B by ' ;J , Developer Signature No ?CCCIint k!Rin:ercare Toorniog Centers, Inc. Pr"K t e d Date +/31/93 bfJ = Developer dvrry 1 , rack, vice PYesi'le.n.t /Her`evt Ha'akins Co., Printed Inc. Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamenga, California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest T _• Approved: � ty nttor-- a , r. q r;er,r ,•I „ngeie� i e 39. i9B, f •J ^rry I!ny L` �r,ynnn Pl,,Io dbinn �,•r i ., ,e , .,.r�.i, .�•.i iii. I I 1 nor. u. sc �,, ow 11 -1 rn ` f f f nll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 0 For Inprcvemeit of: P.1rxl n 7R 91 "CG-Futed Date: = '29/3' by: cnnlneer +n, File Refe -once: P.M. ;291 _Ca ty ^'^'9. No. NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTI °ATE ITEM QUANTITY UNIT Uti1T COST S P.C.C. Curb - 12" L.F. P.C.L. Curb - 8' C.F. 400 L.F. 6.00 2400.00 P.C.C. Curb only 6" C.F. A.C. Berm (5200 Tin.) 4" P.C.L. Sidewalk 1940 S.F. 1.75 3395.00 6" Drive Approach 460 s.F. 2.50 115).00 8" P.C.C. Cross Gutter Street Excavation ITpmted Enbankment 2300 C.Y. 1.50 341:.00 Preparation of Subgrade 11,200 S.F. 0.15 166).00 Crushed F9?re0ate Base (per6in. thick) 0070 S.F. 0.12 959.00 A.C. (over 1300 tans) A.C. (900 to 1300 tons) A.C. (under 500 to 900 tans) 150 TON 60.00 9020.00 A.C. (under 500 tons) Patch F.L. (trench) 1" thick A.C. Overlay 6000 S.F. 0.30 1800.• Adjust Sewer GaLhole to grade Adjust sewer clean out to grade Adjust water valves to grace Street Lights 2 EA. 1500.00 3030.00 Street Signs Street Trees Parkway Drano 1 EA. 000.00 800.00 RcfloctOrs b Posts 5 EA. 35.00 175.00 Easement Dcaina Ge L.S. L.S. 6000.00 Lorsl Depression 4 1 EA. 500.00 500.00 Plan Pm oaration L.S. L.S. L.S. 3000.00 CONSTRUCTION LOST $37,310.00 _ CONTINGENCY COSTS 3,730.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $41,040.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SURETY (100 %) _541,000.00 LABOP AND MATERIAL SECURITY (50:) 520,500.00 _ ENGINEFRI 3 INSPECTION FEE State Permit 'RESTORATICNTOFLIIIEATION CASH DEPOSIT State Pe_m1[ (REiL UFRLE) MCNUI" NTATION SURETY (CASH) *Pursuant to City of Rancho Cuuunonga Municipal Code, Title 1, Chapter 1.09, adopting San Bernardino County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash resturntinn /dulinration deposit shall be made prior to issuance of an Engineering Construction Permit. r1 U I • W.NZm III eUFl.IQU BOND Nee9o3e FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the CI ty Council of the CI ty Of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Herbert Hawkins Co., Inc. (hereinafter designated as principal ) nave entered Inca an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and conclete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated May 25 , 198 9 and {dent{fied as project parr 1 N,n TAgl is hereby referred to antl made a part hereof ;and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and Sateco Insurance Coanamy as surety, are held and firmly bound unto tAe 1ty o ancno Cucamonga (hereinafter called_ City "), in the penal sum of Forty One T Ousand and no /100 _ _ _ __ ___ ________ _________________ Dogs e, nnn nn awru money o the un,sed aces, for the payment of wn'tch sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation Is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, • and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and of feet. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, Incurred by City {n successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci- fications accompanying the same shall In anywise affect its obligations On this bond, and It does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the SP7If {r at {ors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EBF, this instrument has been of ly aVoted by - -- -- - the principal and surety above named, on June 28, 198y , 199 ) Iicrhert Ilawkins, Co., Inc, f/ epe o� per La rr �' y, a res .en Rindercare Learninq rentnrs BM{tq 1N0 CA AMT Or AMNICA Oeve ldper) .eery t /�19///1'. e I eT: Ifi41t t a s'! �� if� f-✓ can rtante M. 8%l Y[la av� PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST OE NOTARIZED F'ALCVt® IN BUPLIGn ROD 04688038 LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of R arc ' ^,o Cuc among a, State of California, and Herbert Hawkins co„ Inc, (hereinafter des ignated V as r,ac :pal "j r. ove art area Into ar, agreement whereby principal li,aes to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated vav 25 198 3 , and identified as pro3ecc Parcel Nan 7391 Is nereby rererred to and made a part hereof; amp WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (Commencing with Section 3052) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NO'd, TREREFORE, said pr i me I al and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of Twe^c +IMF rl P'. 11-- 11 —11—_ Dollars ($20,500.00 ), for mate rla,s furnlsmed or lacor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or tabor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and a1%. in case Sol, 15 brought Upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as casts and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this band Shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, compamies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 30a2) of Part 4 of Divison 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a rignt of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this band. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the term% of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations an this bond, and it does here- by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and Buretr above named, on ammo 28, 198? 93 3 9encort Ilawglns Co., Tnc. 1'.i nd pr cnrc NAl6CD INBDPANCN CptYANT or Alum _ to no ronccr- _ ROeva ap arl Surety lsignatu rcl Don't nci M.nBhyl tr In rac,f, PLEASE ATTACH POWE!t OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONUS • SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED L'I 9 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 29th day of Anne 1983 , by and between H(i,Mft Ew Herbert 'lawki.ns ro. Inc. L,,*+ rrg- -Eenters (hereinafter referred to as -Developer*), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the recordation of Parcel Map 7891, the City requires the • construction of missing off -site street improvements including one -half landscaped median island adjacent to the property to be developed; and WHEREAS, the Developer's desire to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enter into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement Shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements If the Developer fail or neglect to do so that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due city. U I NOR, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: • 1. The Developer hereby agree that they will install off -site street improvements including one -half landscaped median island io accordance and comp Ii an ce with all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said improvements shall be installed upon and along foothill Blvd. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be Completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said improvments shall be at no expense to the City. 3. In the event the Developer fail or refuse to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely in • manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City Of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, to•wit: Parcel Nap 7891, as recorded in Book , Page Official Records of San Bernardino County, ate of CA 1 Or nia. 2 • rI LA S. This conveyance 1s in trust, however, for the purposes described above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. ]. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. • 8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developere shall be -mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and any ocher statute pertaining to mortages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the Provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. U 3 E IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY DEVELOPER man 'MhraBl vt CITY OF RAa CUCAMONGA, Kind ea[e Learn r.9 Centers, Inc. CALIFORNIA, a municipal „/r n/ �I / corporation orporat, Tatty ,Y.`• r/ 8y: on 0. Mike s Mayor DEVELOPER ATTEST: � Herbert Ha / = /ehay LaLren M Wasserman e— a �i ce pYe sidept city Clerk / ..««....A. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BER NAROINO) On ,19—,before me the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared JON D. MIKELS, personally known to me to be the Mayor of the CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL I I I TV rn r V ur m\n 1 Bonn of Los Angeles Jun. 30, 1983 .rr Jerry Hay w,... r, .. r.. a.. Vice r,.. 11 rru I tynno ttowm Rn A1111S Notary Signature POR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP IXL NO JVNNI IJ nVr N,.Ylr,n„L.• n urrnr vr.nr,.. rr, JURAi IS REQU-1q CO. • 4 �t1\ man 'MhraBl vt \V ;r_(Y r rvlrfr YIf r ,ll IXL NO JVNNI IJ nVr N,.Ylr,n„L.• n urrnr vr.nr,.. rr, JURAi IS REQU-1q CO. • 4 0 • Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician Ci�O cUCA1411,,_9 LI ?, S 1977 SUBJECT: Approval of Tract Maps 11173 and 11173 -1 submitted by M. J. Brock and Sons, Inc. and located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street The subject maps were approved by Planning Com.nission on November 10, 1981 for the construction of 117 patio homes within the R -3 zone located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street. Bonds and Agreement for the construction of off -site improvements were accepted at the City Council meeting of June 15, 1983. The Bonds and Agreement were accepted prior to map to enable the developer to build model home units only. Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District, Chaffey Union High School and Alta Loma High School Districts. The City Attorney is reviewing the C.C. &R.s at this time. If approval has not been received by tonight's meeting, said tract map should not be approved, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the resolution approving Tract Maps 11173 and 11173 -1 and authorize the City Engineer to submit said map to the County Recorder, Respectfully submXted, LBVBK:jaa Attachments 0 0 0 fr j�nrur asw • «I — I yrprr, J � 1 ��� 1 - F''�3 ••�L � - -. -. _ I`�m I.�'TLr � r i ✓ i � -'.(mil. ,'�. L_ ?I, { r�¢, ,r�J �.•�.J �..1J '�� } l- �4`. -+' y'J. I�C S {,`C i -� + • s - - I z�I3 0 • RESOLUTION NO. * � T J06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO.'S 11173 and 11173 -1 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No.'s 11173 and 11173 -1, consisting of 117 lots, submitted by M.J. Brock & Sons, Inc., Subdivider, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 2. That said Tract Maps be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to • present to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES; ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Cler 9 n(0 Jon D. Mike s, Mayor 1;. CHAFFEY J61NT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT O211 NFS1 FIFTH $THE" 71TPfl10. CP11F0P1IA 91162 .. 000�� June 29, 1983 Letter of Certification of School District Capacity ' within the Chaffee Joint Union High School District and the Alta Loma Tg cnoo attendance bourdaries for the following described project: • C.J Location /Description: Number of Dwellings: Tract No. 11173, 11173 -1 19th 8 Archibald Rancho Cucamonga 117 Anticipated Completion Date: June 1985 The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 18 students will be provided within 29 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 —day period shall validate such commitment. Superintendent Z. Supe rin�te�nnd�Jeeni: by Dianne cc: Planning Division `•'�'��� City of Rancho Cucamonga r) I Established IGRS BOARD OF TRUSTEES ROBERT S. FROST ROBERT W. TANGEMAN MRS. LIZ GALLARINI MRS. SAND" A. OERLY JOHN C. nOOK Alta Loma School District 9350-F Baschne Road • Post Ofltte To. 370 Alta Loma. California 91701 . 714/987.070 JOHN E. hl .MURTRY 5uprnntrnd,w FLOYD M. STORK P"'o 'VS.ppon S"I"r June 28, 1983 STACY NELSON Da L' 0 Bwlnvs SIMI., HILLY STRAIN Cumcu!urNSpenaf ProJr<t+ LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY For Residential Construction within the Alta Loma School District. DEVELOPER M. J. Brock and Sons, Inc. TRF.CT NUMBER 11173 & 11173- 11,0CATI0N 19th and Archibald lliis - fu single ramliy NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS 11173 -1 - 47 single family ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE June 1985 • Gentlemen: The Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 70 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any suc- cessor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points, The commitment of this ennnci ty shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final man or the issuance of building Permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90day period shall validate such commitment. Very truly yours, I'loy;l m. Sl.ork At1nlini9LraL0r PCrOOnnCI mul SupPort Ser':1COS • lh cc: Planning Division, CiLy Of ItanChO Cucamonga 9" o • RESOLUTION NO. * 83 — /Q 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INDICATING THE CITY'S DESIRE FOR AND WILLINGNESS TO ,PARTICIPATE IN MODIFICATIONS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - INTERSTATE 15 INTERCHANGE AND REQUESTING THAT CALTRANS PROCEED WITH COORDINATION OF THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FOR THESE MODIFICATIONS WHEREAS, Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 15 are State Highways 66 and 15, respectively; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation constructed the interchange between these two highways in its present configuration; and WHEREAS, City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted General and Community Plans which will result in the need for increased service to be provided by said interchange as determined by traffic engineering studies; and WHEREAS, the City proposes appropriate modifications to Foothill Boulevard and to the existing Foothill Boulevard - Interstate 15 interchange as mitigation for said development. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby affirms its desire for and willingness to participate in modifications of Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Boulevard - Interstate interchange and requests the California Department of Transportation to proceed with coordination of the project development process for these modifications. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES; NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. 'Wasserman, City Clerk 'la Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor 041--d t "I - 6 -'R� • RESOLUTION NO. * cy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that a portion of 7th Street is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street on —Map on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part • thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portio�th Street no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: 19 Lauren 14. Wasserman, City Clerk on 0. Mikels, Mayor D() • ORDINANCE NO. 65 -B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTERS 14.04, 14.08, 14.12, 14.16, 14.20 AND 14.28 OF TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE WHICH REGULATES SIGNS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as foIlows: SECTION 1: Section 14.04.010 of Chapter 14.04 is amended to read as follows: Declaration of Need A. The City recognizes the need for signs as a means to identify businesses within the community. The City finds that signing is an important design element of the physical environment. Provisions consistent with the goals and objectives of the community are necessary to insure that the special character and image the community is striving for can be attained while serving business needs in the community. The • City is striving to provide an economically stable and visually attractive community through high quality site planning, building design, landscaping and signing. As a planned architectural feature, a sign can be pleasing and can harmonize with the physical character of its environment. Proper controls can achieve this goal and will make the city a more attractive place to live, work and shop. B. It is the purpose of this title to make the City attractive to residents, visitors and commercial, industrial and professional businesses while maintaining economic stability through an attractive signing program. SECTION 2: Section 14.08.040 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Banner, Flar., Pennant or Balloon. Banner, flag, pennant or balloon" means any c oth, bunting, plastic, paper or similar material used for advertising purposes attached to or pinned on or from any structure, staff, pole, line, framing, vehicle, or other object, SECTION 3: Section 14.08.050 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as • follows: Building Fiace. "Building face" means the area of a building elvation, front, rear, or side, in which the business is located. SECTION 4: Section 14,08.011 is added to Chapter 14,08 to read as follows: City Planner. "City Planner" means the division chief of the Planning Division. SECTION 5: Section 14.08.090 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Convenience Sign. "Convenience sign" means a sign not larger than four square feet in area and no more than four feet in height and which conveys information such as "restrooms ", "no parking ", "entrance ", or minor business identification for directional purposes, and is designed to be viewed on site by pedestrians and /or motorists. �I Ordinance No. Page 2 • SECTION o: Section 14.08.110 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Directional Sign. "Directional sign" means a sign which contains words such as "entrance ", "enter ", "exit ", "in ", "out" or other similar words or a sign containing arrows or characters indicating traffic directions and used either in conjunction with such words or separately. It shall be no greater than four square feet in area and no more than four feet in height. No directional sign shall contain any advertising or trade name information. A subdivision directional sign shall not be included in this category. SECTION 7: Section 14.08.130 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Development Review. "Development review" means a method of review by the City Planner as stipulated in Section 1.08.090 to determine conformance with applicable ordinances. SECTION 8: Section 14.08.171 is added to Chapter 14.08 to read as . follows: Ground Sign. A sign which is not a monument sign, but which is affixed to the ground and used solely for special advertisement purposes or as a directional and convenience sign, as permitted in this ordinance. SECTION 9: Section 14.08.190 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Inoperative Activity. "Inoperative activity" means a business or activity that has ceased operation at any given location for a continuous period of at least sixty days. SECTION 10: Section 14.08.210 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Monument Sign. "Monument sign" means a freestanding sign N less than eight feet in height, incorporating the design and building materials accenting the architectural theme of the buildings on the same property. SECTION 11: Section 14.08.220 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Nonconforming Sign. "Nonconforming sign" means a sign awfully erected which does not comply with the provisions of this title. SECTION 12: Section 14.08.281 is added to Chapter 14.08 to read as follows: Promotional Sales Sign. "Promotional sales sign" means a sign erected on a temporary basis to promote the sale of new products, new management, new hours of operation, a new service, or to promote a special sale. v,z Ordinance No. Page 3 SECTION 13: Section 14.08.330 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Sign. A device, fixture, surface, or structure of any kind or character, made of any material whatsoever, displaying letters, words, texts, illustrations, symbols, forms, patterns, colors, textures, shadows, or lights, or any other illustrative or graphic display designated, constructed, or placed on the ground, on a building canopy, wall, post, or structure of any kind, in a window, or on any other object for the purpose of advertising, identifying, or calling visual attention to any place, structure, firm, enterprise, profession, business, service, product, commodity, person, or activity, whether located on the site, in any structure on the site, or in any other location. The term "placed" shall include constructing, erecting, posting, painting, printing, tacking, nailing, gluing, sticking, sculpting, carving, or otherwise fastening, affixing, or making visible in any manner whatsoever. • SECTION 14: Section 14.08.360 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows: Vehicle Sign. "Vehicle sign" means a sign which is attached to a vehicle which is parked on or adjacent to any property, the principle purpose of which is to attract attention to a product sold or an activity or business located on such property. SECTION 15: Section 14.12.010 of Chapter 14.12 is amended to read as follows: Sign Permit Required. A sign permit shall be required prior to the placing, erecting, moving, or reconstructing of any sign in the City, unless expressly exempted by this title. Signs requiring a permit shall comply with the provisions of this title and all other applicable laws and ordinances. SECTION 16: Section 14.12.020 of Chapter 14.12 is amended to read as follows: Method of Ap�pplication. An application for a permit shall be made on worms as prescribed by the City Planner. Such an application shall he filed with the planning • division. The application shall be accompanied by any fees or bonds as specified by City Council Resolution. SECTION 17: Section 14.12.030 of Chapter 14.12 is amended to read as follows: Method of Review. The purpose of a permit is to help ensure compliance with the provisions of this title. After receipt of a sign application, the City Planner or a designated representative shall render a decision to approve, approve with modifications, or deny such sign request within fifteen working days. Such a review shall ensure that any sign proposal is in conformance with this title and is consistent with its intent and purpose. �� j Ordinance No. Page 4 SECTION IS: Section 14.12.040 of Chapter 14.12 is amended to read as follows: Citv Planner. It is the duty of the City Planner to enforce all provisions of this title. The City Planner has the authority under this title to designate a representative of the department to implement the provisions of this title. Further, the City Planner has the option of referring any sign request to the Planning Commission for their review and approval. SECTION 19: Section 14.12.050 -B of Chapter 14.12 is amended to read as follows: B. Whenever the application of this title is uncertain the question shall be referred to the Planning Commission for determination. The Planning Commission shall then authorize signing which best fulfills the intent of this title. SECTION 20: Section 14.12.070 of Chapter 14.12 is amended to read as follows: ADpea1. A decision of the City Planner may be appealed • within ten days of such decision to the Planning Commission. Such appeal shall be made on the forms prescribed by the Division of Community Development and fees paid in accordance with the Fee Resolution. The submission of the application and fees shall constitute the filing of the appeal. The Planning Commission shall review such appeal at a regularly scheduled meeting according to the schedule of meetings and deadlines for submission of applications. The Commission shall either uphold, reverse, or modify the City Planner's decision. If anyone is aggrieved or affected by the decision of the Planning Commission, then they may appeal such decision to the City Council within ten days from the decision of the Planning Commission. The appeal shall be submitted in accordance with the above appeal provisions. The City Council shall review such appeal and either uphold, reverse, or modify the Commission decision. SECTION 21: Section 14.16.010, subsection A of Chapter 14.16 is amended to re— aoliows: Permanent window signs not exceeding four square feet and limited to business identification, hours of operation, address and emergency information only. SECTION 22: Section 14.16.010, subsection D of Chapter 14.16 is • amended to read as follows: D. Future tenant identification sign: Future tenant identification signs may be placed on vacant or developing property to advertise the future use of the property and where this information may be obtained. Such sign shall be limited to one per street frontage and to a maximum of thirty -two square feet in area and eight feet in overall height for parcels containing ten (10) acres or less. For parcels greater than ten (10) acres, one sign is permitted for every 600 feet of street frontage and is limited to 64 square feet in area per side and fifteen (15) feet in overall height. Such signs may also be placed along the freeway at 1000 foot intervals not to exceed 150 square feet in area per side and 20 feet in overall height. Further, such signs shall be placed no less than ten feet from any property line. Any such sign shall be removed upon completion of such project. I (1 11 Ordinance No. Page 5 SECTION 23: Section 14.16.010, subsection K of Chapter 14.16 is amended to read as follows: Directional, warning, identification, or informational signs or structures required or authorized by law or by federal, state, county, or city authority. SECTION 24: Subsection P is added to Section 14.16.010 of Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: P. Political Signs. Political signs having to do with any issue, ballot measure, or canditate in any municipal, state or federal election or political statements and expressions shall be permitted in any zoning district subject to the following provisions and any other applicable provisions within this title: 1. Any person, party or group posting political signs in the city shall abide by the provisions • herein set forth. 2. All political signs shall be placed no earlier than thirty days prior to the election and shall be removed not later than ten days following the date of the election. 3. A political sign shall not exceed thirty -two square feet ^ total area for one side. No signs shall be placed in a manner that would obstruct visibility of pedestrian or vehicle traffic. 4. All political signs shall not exceed an overall height of eight feet from the finished grade. Signs used for identification of political headquarters shall comply with the provisions of this title. 5. The placement of any sign, whether on public or private property, shall not cause public safety or health hazards. 6. No political sign shall be placed or fixed to a tree, fence, or utility pole, and shall not be • posted on any public property or in the public right -of -way without issuance of an encroachment permit by the City Engineer Division. 7. No political sign shall be .posted in violation of any provisions of this title. Further, the City Planner or his designee shall have the right to remove all signs placed contrary to the provisions of this section. SECTION 25: Section 14.16.020 of Chapter 14.16 is amended to read as follows: Prohibited Si Ins. All signs not expressly permitted are prohibited, including but not limited to the following: A. Roof signs, except as provided for in this title. Ordinance No. 65 -6 Page 6 • B. Flashing signs, except in time and temperature signs. C. Animated signs. D. Revolving signs. E. Vehicle signs. F. Portable signs, except where permitted in this title. G. Off -site signs, except temporary subdivision directional signs as provided for in this title. H. Signs on the public right -of -way, except where required by a governmental agency. I. Signs blocking doors or fire escapes. J. Light bulb strings and exposed tubing, except for temporary uses such as Christmas tree lots. K. Banners, flags, pennants and balloons, except as • provided for in this title. L. Advertising structures, except as otherwise permitted in this title. SECTION 26: Section 14.16.021 is added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: Roof Signs. Roof signs may be used only in the event no other signing alternatives are available. Roof signs may be permitted if architecturally designed and built into the roof structure. Such design shall be compatible in design and materials with the building. SECTION 27: Section 14.16.040 of Chapter 14.16 is amended to read dollows: Enforcement, Penalties and Abatement A. Any violation of the provisions of this Section shall be deemed to be a continuaing violation until the same has been corrected. B. Any person violating any of the provisions of this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be • punishable by fine of not more than $500.00 or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six (6) months or by both such fine and imprisonment. C. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section, the City Attorney upon the order of the City Council, may commence an action in a court of competent Jurisdiction to obtain an injunction prohibiting the construction, erection, maintenance or display, or requiring the removal, of any sign which is in violation of any of the provisions of this Section. In any such action, the City shall be entitled to recover its costs and its reasonable attorney's fees. Ordinance No. Page 7 0. The owner or other person entitled to possession of a sign which is removed, stored and /or destroyed pursuant to any provision of this Section shall be liable to the City for the cost of such removal, storage and /or destruction and the City may recover the sane through an action commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction together with the City's court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. E. Any illegal sign within the public right -of -way is hereby found and declared to be public nuisance, and such sign may be abated by the City as follows: 1. If the address of the owner or other person entitled to possession of said sign is known, notice of the City's intention to remove and destroy the sign, stating the date after which sign will be removed and destroyed, shall be mailed to the owner or other person entitled to possession by certified mail, return receipt requested at least ten (10) days before said • date. If the address of the owner or other person entitled to possession is not known, such notice shall be affixed in a conspicuous place on said sign at least ten (10) days before said date. Such notice shall also set forth the provisions of this Section. The owner or other person entitled to possession of said sign may, before the removal date stated in the notice, file a written request for hearing with the Planning Division. Said request shall identify the sign and its location, state the name and address of the owner or other person entitled to possession and set forth in detail the contentions why said sign should not be removed and destroyed. 3. If a request for hearing is filed, the Planning Commission shall hear the matter at a regularly scheduled meeting held not more than thirty (30) days thereafter. After said hearing, the Planning Commission shall determine whether or not said sign is an illegal sign within the public right -of -way. The written decision of the Planning Commission shall be rendered • within ten (10) days after the hearing and a copy of said decision shall be mailed to the owner or other person entitled to possession within seven (7) days thereafter. Unless a notice of appeal is filed as hereinafter provided, the decision of the Planning Commission shall become final ten (10) days after mailing. The owner or other person entitled to possession may file a notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after the date of mailing of the Planning Commission's decision. If a timely notice of appeal is filed, the matter shall be heard by the City Council at a regular meeting scheduled not more than thirty (30) days thereafter. After hearing, the City Council shall determine whether or not said sign is an illegal sign within the public right -of -way. The written decision of the City Council shall be rendered Ordinance No. Page 8 • within ten (10) days after the hearing and a copy of said decision shall be mailed to the owner or other person entitled to possession within seven (7) days thereafter. The decision of the City Council shall become final ten (10) days after mailing. 5. Unless the owner or other person entitled to possession of such sign, on or before the removal date stated in the notice described in this section, files a written request for hearing with the Planning Department, the City may, at any time after said date, remove and destroy said sign. If a written request for hearing is filed then upon any final decision of the Planning Commission or the City Council determining that said sign is an illegal sign within the public right -of -way, the City may remove and destroy said sign. 6. Notwithstanding any provision of this Section to the contrary, any illegal sign within the • public right -of -way which constitutes a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic may be removed immediately and stored by the City, at the expense of the owner or other person entitled to possession, pending completion of the notification and hearing procedures hereinabove set forth. SECTION 28: Section 14.16.060 is added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: Use of Flags. The use of flags are permitted in conjunction with an approved residential subdivision sales office or a commercial office, or an industrial leasing office. The use of such flags shall conform to the following provisions: A. A maximum of six (6) may be used. B. The flags shall be no higher than fifteen (15) feet. C. The flags shall be displayed in the immediate vicinity of the sales /leasing office. In no case shall the flags be allowed within the public right - of -way. D. In the case of a residential subdivision office, the • flags can be maintained as long as a valid operating permit for the sales office has been granted. E. In the case of a commercial office, or industrial leasing office, the flags may be maintained until 75% of the spaces have been leased. F. The maximum size of the flag shall not exceed 3' x 5' and shall be maintained in good condition. Torn or worn flags shall be replaced. 4x • Ordinance No. 65 -8 Page 9 SECTION 29: Section 14.20.020 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: Convenience Signs. The following signs may be permitted in any zoning district subject to the provisions listed: A. On -site signs which are necessary for public convenience or safety but which are not exempt, may be approved by the City Planner or his designee. S. Signs containing information such as "entrance ", "exit ", or directional arrows shall be designed to be viewed from on -site or from an area adjacent to the site by pedestrians or motorists while parking their automobile. C. Signs that convey advertising, or products, shall not be considered a convenience sign. D. Any such sign shall not be allowed within the public right -of -way. E. Such signs shall not exceed four (4) square feet in area, per side. In the case of a ground sign, the overall height shall not exceed four (4) feet. SECTION 30: Section 14.20.030 of Chapter 14.20 is repealed in its entirety. SECTION 31: Section 14.20.040 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: Special Event Signs. Special event signs may be approved Tor a limited period of time in any zoning district as a means of publicizing special events such as grand opening, carnivals, festivals, charitable events, Christmas tree lots, and fireworks stands. To apply for approval of special event signs, the applicant shall submit a letter to the City Planner which describes the proposed sign by means of a sketch and the display dates. The City Planner shall review the request within fifteen working days after receipt and shall make a determination to approve, approve with modification or deny the request. Such special event signs shall be limited to the following provisions: A. No more than one special event sign shall be • permitted per activity and shall be either a wall, window or ground sign, and use of flags, banners and pennants. B. All special event signs shall be a maximum of fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof or shall be no higher than eight feet in the case of a ground sign. C. Special event signs shall be limited to forty -five days per calendar year. X n Ordinance No. Page 10 CJ SECTIO`1 32: Section 14.20.041 is added to Chapter 14.20 to read as follows: Promotional Sales Signs. A promotional sales sign may be approved for a temporary period of time, as specified below, for commercial and industrial uses. The signs may be used to promote the sale of new products, new management, new hours of operation, a new service, or to promote a special sale. Any business desiring to use a promotional sales sign, must file an application and drawing or photograph, with the City Planning Division for review and approval. The use of such signs are subject to the following limitations: A. No more than one sign shall be permitted per activity or business. B. The signs shall be temporary signs designed either as a wall sign, window sign or ground sign. The sign can be in the form of a banner or pennant. C. The sign shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet and • shall be posted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the height of the sign shall not exceed 8 feet. D. Promotional sale signs shall be limited to a display period not to exceed 15 days. Four such periods shall be permitted for each calendar year, not to exceed a total of 60 days per year. Two periods may be combined for thirty (30) consecutive days. SECTION 33: Section 14.20.060 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: Permitted Signs - -Off -site Subdivision Directional Sign. The following signs may be permitted in any zoning district subject to the provisions listed: A. A maximum of six signs may be used to lead customers to the site. B. Signs shall be no longer than sixty inches by nine inches and shall be grouped on a four sided sign structure as shown in Exhibit "A". Such structure shall contain no more than seven tract identification. C. A sign structure shall be located not less than six • hundred feet from an existing or previously approved sign site. Further, each sign may only contain the name of the subdivision, and a directional arrow as shown on Exhibit "B ". D. The placement of each sign structure shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. E. Signs placed on private property shall be done with written consent of the property owner and filed with the department of community development prior to issuance of permit, Signs in the public right -of -way, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the sign permit. F. A sign location plan shall be prepared showing the site of each directional sign and shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to the issuance of sign permit. go • Ordinance No. Page 11 G. Any such sign approved for a particular subdivision within the city shall not be changed to advertise another subdivision without prior approval of the City Planner. H. There shall be no additions, tag signs, streamers, devices, display boards, or appurtenances added to the sign as originally approved. Further, no other directional signing may be used such as posters, or trailer signs. I. All non - conforming subdivision directional signs associated with the subdivision in question must be removed prior to the issuance of a new sign permit. J. A five - hundred - dollar cash deposit shall be placed with the city to ensure compliance with this ordinance. Any_ sign placed contrary to the provisions of this title may be removed by the city and the cost of removal shall be deducted from said • deposit. Additional costs incurred by the city resulting from the removal of illegal signs shall be charged to the developer. K. The sign shall be allowed until subdivision is sold out. • L. The off -site subdivision sign program may be implemented and installed through the Building Industry Association (BIA) if an agreement is approved for the regulation and control between the City and the BIA. If such a program is implemented, all off -site subdivision signs shall be regulated and installed per the agreement and approvals between the BIA and the City. The BIA shall not install any new structures without express written consent of the City Planner. SECTION 34: Section 14.20.070 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: Permitted Signs -- Agricultural Uses. The following signs may be permitted for agricultural uses subject to the provisions listed: CL. \SS ��r TYPE BUY 111.11 9l.. AB I A MA %I \1GN IE\IAgAS I. II I.m�.. 11 n 11 nr pne per et.eel IS p.'e feet 90— rwfllne for Snell ide."r, only Ine Mree\ eM Ilrt InGnU be'lm man ,1 n8n re.:o,.A ..H vem.M l feel pIoa.el [,o.n cn pre mix4 m of le. BY, ae far. [�auml .IRn Nlnwlin;nl ..... prorieed. or ownee. w, vmllem�n.me. 2. n.me pl.le 1101 on. p•r p.r for 9.qu..e re.l Belo, ronrLne sMUlaen e(v me lv me .na;er ndd.ea or .,Id,M l' eeeop.nl ��r Ordinance No. Page 12 • SECTION 35: Section 14.20.80 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: Permitted Si ns -- Residential Uses. The following signs may be permitted far residentia uses sub3ect to the provisions listed: L'L. \>5 51GN A %INl'N MA \I4VM MA %I.N L'N RENAPNS TYPE NV 51bEfl SIGN ARLA NEICIIi 1. vm! Vl.lr NNI ne pn puawl 3 yunM (eel SECTION 36: Section 14.20.090 of Chapter 14.20 is repealed in its entirety. 91,_ • In. —mi. SMII idInllfr IM ..I u c,r eeerev If IM } In.IrluVmn $r ;M •M OneM• xe Au•.fee Oe roonrrc N•m rm only eTe anvm!nlnm One per uze xl Wuve feet PIe<I In I., T. rE!InIdYlM maleulrm •M, frn:.Ir.N erla I,. C. ror ffe rePr .1 t,", +pzew •venu .M nme c( . Intl 1. Nnl er Two per a quue r t S (eel (nr ..,I atn hpr ." ee nmrlea m IR rum. leenl^I .nl�n on,rmenl ee.elrymenl 1 •M .feel In I.— at trv!IOPmenr , ' murnml u[n p. Allnvrl Mlv r(r namY o •M •9um< munlMS reepwrnrlrlyn N•inlennntt i+ lC,e reePrw,+rEil llv of Ih eWrq�nel! Mmmnrly •aainlron 3. 5!MaI L'r,unrl,mn ,eR One'.. :p+...re fee bao. r.nrne .me Ina .eer.a nt +.IOpl amy i.. M.nd, ro x I.,. ao.Iaer m.I s f.e rrom one par me vp 1. sa.P,... r.n up II n (eel from .rm nnrem'a ma IM prnprNlr uoe P Ta r IM uMOI •n1, to erspl•y t.. .peer. eve'13 wrin Mm. m.nee.el.. 3. N'.Il nr One pn .—.1 IS AWre(eel A -11•[n .. -1 , Sq. P&O nermmi.< nln lM — t, IW reenlrfre•Ven memnel R.nlnef wi lA pole.l Ware IM Dorm of 1. hvelWlnM1 uxnnru yr 11,11 mnrm. m.rlwo,I, ee.elWnrM1 rmnrne I. In m e.n.n .+eeM xV n. -AIlt umlmH mlY IWVe Rnn.ad Lr/rk •I • mqumenl NmuI'I. Ln.+Mll Ee pl.eN AO elu.r IMll ml <.ttea Ilr.n I' I. llk properly lrre. 1, In 6'm nerSnL One per a ug,.r, feet Awill YHn llvll ml SHro+Mll III—n— n111. u•1•aia nrilirn rron m.n ii.nu :1 onumenl (ronln;e wilirre ..rm.m enwo .,:it .pave IM mnrrc Eem, of l,e .... menl. a roli e..eea iT a M r-I b(.Jm( only .e..e fn1.M RreeI ment I. Nonumenl +rm /No ce WtN ru tlun uIin null ee.J IM1n Sr to lne pmpctY Nne. f' n MrHlrl. SECTION 36: Section 14.20.090 of Chapter 14.20 is repealed in its entirety. 91,_ • LJ • L Ordinance No. Page 13 SECTION 37: Section 14.20.100 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: Permitted Si ns-- Colmnercial and Office Uses. The following signs may be permitted for commercia and of ice uses subject to the provisions listed: l .�\ 5I1:µ 4A lIN1'.N IAµt1 \IMl4 R1..lT1ii9ii T11-1 µV1111tµ SI^V Hit ,.n po. P<r mnnml{ to 1. elm Mderna Io proP'rl ells[ I. n t 01 m ,ne won rl n eot tort , .n m er q. 0 .r�,.: •) earRns [e 111 i�.r IStrvlµnre fret erne n n ra >< uIA 1 e nulrnry 1'la fee 11A Nenlr(1 .n] m< Wallev. finr ned ;rnJ< n,'. 1:R�e nr.l mYn m Fm e< nonr,i � ..VIe re.`.moio e<ra ,..• 1, — onamrnr un, .r a.fe v.I n, 1,,t I rp to a mn . tmnieee •i.e me .r elorm 1. b olzl ry':rnunnru +n „"m aeell ne n rrd 0 li, ur- rIM•11 1 p10p[r1Y . •bll I, Dose ones; a vn. o. pee �� prep «ly. 11, .II one m nelt', mi of A. Nrmrrlt vollnti"i<e .tore A M ton nr on .n. .n. ..n m� tine •.1,;' na m ar :.e . e «lea m . f .M n nee, rose < mlr .rcno sae I-, I. J fer mrY Ol 00 ,oere feel ^Oro. •irh nr,:n ome du rn.•r v.N 1 na= <ean ,em, umrl<e m Foam. .emnnnuon omr. MMOmmI o, mry mnl.rn W to lion ell,i -non, pv irh: all M1'r I h 11eme e or IFe [mile .M 1.0 ImYJ. o Ih« Ve, ee[ian laoler, «nl n 1e) or .11 m l. sL Yellhto use Mlmp,ume le tie �alenl Eprgn el •R'^ mlrlonlun LnlsnetaeI ahe«et. n A4 mrMneei1 nalmn.Iry.. �.e.eed An a,J nl Mm.m IM mm. A n.M n'e rn .i, m l nm it It ",I"_I tt. sem of 1• .mm or uln annnpina lemon .MU e<nlpp one .o-« 1 zee .n..n net aP m not mnn.,1 p« in to' .II I ... nV Rn 1oto ., n mn. To elleene I,,. <l«..rn laM. —t— Um11W r norm. yp g " ,.:,t., . a voa'r.. in,,a 1e nine lin, -on,". of Ile gall.m f. TIK ne"t" ." mo rote w Ilr ["ne, To ne hl<rmIMJ Inwe11 Is1. reel up lef het on nee Ona•um N MmlrnenM to IM .i!Y Memn. . snot ter ✓o.."I LN lent. AY eq, mey ne q.e.J . •In • . IS. a «.. fml e.ek.. rnm It !. nont.. a XIoY eve[ rnm Ve re- of eur0l. 1. Rvarnen Fell To ne@1 «miM,r Ly in' of me role of .0, to p.oleel .COm A taneeptrul 11 "'1 fa noon n IM C.ty PWrrt. .orlon wne.e IM roof. timildq Let, M lepoiM.l tie lime of -ur en n— none ol, . to e, Plnceer le mite tern.. Pro'.,•�p•tnlln,it, iMrnMel toln., a «] 6J arlunreofoll, p Te I", pWne, .1. rtrle. .Y Dole[ OT'^ r in, ✓tm P, ma woW.n 1. pant. -:` r: rn1 roi 11 ol— oi, ep to 11 f«, nr pron,Nn o Jeie< st v nlm rr.1 or o 1 1. n e Mee iuln ud male Jutllll,, .", 1,, lie intent of this nedrMone. T I. nei-.. M4r Is oieee reel Tone ,let.,. n, r. 1.r IM 1'i1r irenorr IYnnn. IM mry donne, µe city inen're.. 1. 11— 111 Bran 11n11 no 1, rhea to nears en non ilknerymc IM runt or m, pAfNrmel innin,l al WJJmlt <nmpline. a rn R. nlnmory Lam puree InrmIni 1 tie , —I'l 'el atoll ne nnn.e rn mi �¢mn. vo..0 M 1 Serri.1 .11 a lion IiW 1 .1ne1 late or wtetrll fwa not .W.. Mf Lim, AMmmt,intiee, a m enl IGrnlrhr.00n•,t rMnl,[e, mn r mu lot 1. naae I6. left. nin no uaM, hulmmOt lMn.lm ed.1 PrrrrnS ) mRov. rnt )apM. rn.:rnrnl I. Tn. m mml a an.11 Fe ........ to 31, ye. .11[11 16 1-re feet. Vp la 91.11 Irr.tlI I n", ,, i nl�feerlron of 1 I,t,- •r.l . 1111i or .nJ 6 +`nine pn<ea µo otnn pna,gv sinlinn <nllownl. n .I non.. all n R'-H I,,I fm r i, grmp I vloer<leet If ma null .Iln. ne IM11 n, Ir mitre to ,00h me n n1111eorrMr ,nrine nnr^ npy. rinnnlne art( ell a .r, osier ,h.,r emtr,eell or nonrllrrmrnnled. eri,n. (.r rnd aiRni I II rFmpnl.r frellm .'. r - o Ten tn.inlron ,n•r I•rl \ r' or'I o a1,11 <I.I vrrl:o'r, rnt atoll oe Irmrlre la o „rro.rmen r.�f n,l I ter ....... K..... l and o.......... r1, r 11 nn1 I JIM 6l rl in nnanl. VI n Tretl.r m,1 , ,+ ^Inv 11. per II,­— a poen Ir.l nlm .onto I 111 aoen .en.nerl<ml,, "y tM'emir.... om of „hmma tie lu.roen l w prentn,nma11. Rrn�e.ro rmfa•ny\am m•Lrw In \el ln. nm.Nw ]0'e. ar ll.e nrnMn win sans uli nmi1M IeepVny Int r•I.mar.a.l a.een ar.aT nr>• Pr. rl menufrretlut a. pr� Ird .nil tie a1.aw1 �,.�Y -lop —I or. Yarmel.lr.gµa emir rin"llul.an”. m.lell n. neeo pt,rone ny tM eteler 1•Ie. In le, mr.nll nlgran l of l to goleel. rrMl Mlol..1 W •Rm aN11M .Amt l IN to l le l: ilr rlemr,v .,:mrmo...r In the ran M., oil Itoo ne,i:.lr Pmnn.I Ile. nne. ra rmmulmrY nth apmml mi'ptoel MT..m. Ito. i. In..1rr. rlm.knonne. er.'mMre lM,lrr•. rtn.rptal e. qa.,m LaIIM,Fnhq..1.M,Ipere.I n111e olnmry, ..In 111 em.11.lpm..t elite Mnlerl. P .pflh pfa.Nll ne ..n.n111N 1a 1M City PYn.e1 N f—.. min IM o(n Ivm.t pi —terse, m V, P. eM, rerlen to —,,t—, nln.Re erN n—plal ,no r .. Ordinance No. 65 -8 Page 14 • SECTION 38: Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: Permitted Signs -- industrial Uses. The following signs may be permitted nor i�usCr ial —uses subject to the provisions listed: 11e33 SECTION 39: Section 14.28.020 of Chapter 14,28 is amended to read as follows: General Requirements A. A nonconforminig sign may not be: 1. Changed to another nonconforming sign. 2. Structurally altered to extend its useful life. 3. Expanded. 4. Reestablished after a business discontinued for sixty days. 5. Reestablished after damage or destruction of more than fifty percent of its value, as • determined by the building official, B. No new sign shall be approved for a site, structure, building or use that contains nonconforming signs unless such nonconforming signs are removed or modified to conform with the provisions of this title. C. No building permit shall be issued for any structures, building expansions or new building construction on a site which contains nonconforming signs, unless all signs on the site are brought into conformance with this title. This does not include interior alterations which do not substantially change the character or intensity of the site, t VN Ir.1 AIRRINtI.I RKNARKS TYPE TYPE Nl'.I IIKR tf "O MIN 314H AXt:1 1111"r • Wen oo. 11 dd•ot, lol or m<Iwnernu non. Vnlll .b.< nmi o"f e< Lmnea L<n r, rn tl, n< no`to 4«. c,M IM 1.11.1 w t rtmlr Lntm ale., <m ` t. nrsL« IM. !n ft .Lore xmrmM sred<. mum<.t ... ... ,lrc.. uuue r, rnl up to a lee. A .mowrom or moll eM mm `n�.; n• ^< ,. c <�... P' 1 (lull nog i ..<.<a xro..rn. wr lualevl '1'•!'fu P'Jt t"'. 11 W.leny I0%of.M N11d.nr .'Not to Proles. eLor< well .T, gall i n<m.n :..<rm.noel t— not to <,«M f tt nol 1. <. <` t',, 1.(Le rn p . W I.oeIM A. 1<..m <eN 1 <M zo ^rW ��.`I<.vLn< e w lev. ,N o. .111 iT< d,..n<n ay.•I xr 1 em Bien n1< W.r It ­1 )6 ea1..<x<e. vq to el tron:.ei «t 1e m.0 LU mlr IM smr<v e ru no e r �o :.1e�ex In, pv=11ol —In TK Na.e :, dn«101r ^ ^I fi ol.rm ml IoetN <m< e:. ee1:«t 01. neee x. e.u. r<rael u to ual o P.ry ne c. o<.R mem<n Vom d<""oent d. A m 'n<nt id<nllfrnl.on ii P<rm�itM in Leu al 11, d.re<l id<nl n derelPommt. SECTION 39: Section 14.28.020 of Chapter 14,28 is amended to read as follows: General Requirements A. A nonconforminig sign may not be: 1. Changed to another nonconforming sign. 2. Structurally altered to extend its useful life. 3. Expanded. 4. Reestablished after a business discontinued for sixty days. 5. Reestablished after damage or destruction of more than fifty percent of its value, as • determined by the building official, B. No new sign shall be approved for a site, structure, building or use that contains nonconforming signs unless such nonconforming signs are removed or modified to conform with the provisions of this title. C. No building permit shall be issued for any structures, building expansions or new building construction on a site which contains nonconforming signs, unless all signs on the site are brought into conformance with this title. This does not include interior alterations which do not substantially change the character or intensity of the site, t 19 Ordinance No. 65 -B Page 15 SECT ION 40: Section 14.28.050 is added to Chapter 14.28 to read as follows: Hardship Cases. Under cases of extreme hardship and unusual circumstances, the Planning Commission shall have the authority to allow the retention of a nonconforming sign if the Commission specifically finds that extreme hardship and unusual circumstances exist. The proponent of such request, shall have the burden of clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance does exists and warrants the retention of such sign. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing. The procedures for conducting the public hearing and aplication fees shall be regulated by the variance procedures and fees established by the City Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission shall use the following findings for determining that an extreme and unusual circumstance exists: • A. The site has a unique character or features that causes visibility problems. B. The sign does not create a traffic hazard. C. The sign does not create a visual blight to the commun i ty. D. The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties. E. The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. F. No other signing alternative or design would be feasible or be able to provide reasonable signing in accordance with this ordinance. If the Planning Commission finds that a an extreme and unusual circumstance exists, but that the design or condition of the sign creates a visual blight, then the Commission can grant a relief from the amortization of the nonconforming sign with the condition that the sign he remodeled to a more aesthetic design. If a business • or shopping center, found to have the above hardship and which contains nonconforming signs, is remodeled, then the Commission shall have the authority to request that the nonconforming signs be upgraded to match the design and architectural style of the remodeled buildings. follo SECTION 41: Section 14.28.060 is added to Chapter 14.28 to read as ws: Removal and Relocation of Advertising Structures A. Advertising displays located in an agricultural zone or residential zone and located more than 660 feet from an interstate right -of -way and not intended to be read from an interstate highway, shall be removed from the site without compensation in accordance with the following schedule. This schedule shall commence upon written notice of removal data. Ordinance No. 65 -8 Page 16 41 Fair Market Value on Date of Notice Minimum Years of Removal Requirement Allowed Under $1, 999 ......... ..............................2 $2.000 to $3, 999 ..... ..............................3 $4,000 to $5, 999 ..... ..............................4 $6,000 to $7, 999 ..... ..............................5 $8,000 to $9, 999 ..... ..............................6 $10,000 and over ..... ..............................7 The value shall be determined by the City Planner and City Building Official. The determined value will be sent to owner. Any disagreement of said value shall follow appeal procedures set forth in this title. SECTION 42: The City Council finds that these amendments will not adversely affect the environment and hereby issues a negative declaration. SECTION 43: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be publisned within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Repor, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Calif rnia, and circulated in the City of • Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. '�lasserman, City C erk Jon O. Mikels, Mayor 0 RESOLUTION NO. 83-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga calls for the preparation of a specific plan for the Etiwanda area; and WHEREAS, a draft of the Specific Plan was prepared by the Advisory Committee and forwarded to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Draft Specific Plan, considered public comments, reviewed the environmental implications of the draft Plan and recommends approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan with modification to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65500 of the California Government Code to consider further public input; and • WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolutions certifying the adequacy of the associated Draft Environmental Impact Report and adopting General Plan Amendment 83 -01S. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the Etiwanda Specific Plan is hereby adopted, based on the following findings: 1. The Etiwanda Specific Plan has been prepared in accordance with Section 65450 through 65553 of the Government Code. 2. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains regulatory provisions that are necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare of the people of Rancho Cucamonga, and required for the systematic implementation of the City's General Plan, as amended, in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. 3• The Etiwanda Specific Plan substantially mitigates the potential for adverse impacts that would likely occur as a result of development under the existing Zoning Ordinance. The Specific Plan contains • detailed regulatory provisions tailored specifically to the Etiwanda area that are designed to replace current City -wide regulations that could not deal effectively with Etiwanda's unique qualities and problems. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor 91 0 ORDINANCE NO. 703 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REGULATORY PROVISIONS SECTION OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND ,AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP FOR THE ETIWANDA AREA ACCORDING TO THESE PROVISIONS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The Regulatory Provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan are hereby approved and adopted, based on the following findings: 1. The Etiwanda Specific Plan has been prepared in accordance with Section 65450 through 65553 of the Government Code. • 2. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains regulatory provisions that are necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare of the people of Rancho Cucamonga, and required for the systematic implementation of the City's General Plan, as amended, in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The Etiwanda Specific Plan substantially mitigates the potential for adverse impacts that would likely occur as a result of development under the existing Zoning Ordinance. The Specific Plan contains detailed regulatory provisions tailored specifically to the Etiwanda area that are designed to replace Current city -wide regulations that could not deal effectively with Etiwanda's unique qualities and problems. SECTION 2: The City's official Zoning Map is hereby amended to contain an ESP designation on the real property described in Section 3, below. Further, the development of said property shall be regulated by the Regulatory Provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan text, and maps, except that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance and /or other applicable regulation, shall continue to govern items not specifically addressed by these Regulatory Provisions. • SECTION 3: The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all real property described below: Etiwanda Specific Plan area - approximately 3000 acres within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, bounded on the north, northwest and east by current city limits, on the south by the centerline of Foothill Boulevard, and on the west by the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community; also including all properties located within 200' of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and 24th Street; and also including the area south of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue and north of Arrow Route, but excluding the area south of Miller Avenue and west of Etiwanda Avenue. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. �j i 0 • D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CgCA.vio1^ STAFF REPORT IIZ I7 DATE: July 6, 1983 1977 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 83 -04 - RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS An Ordinance Amen ing Section .02 9 b , resi ential parking standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission meeting o-, May 25, 1983, the Planning commission considered some requests from developers to reexamine and update the City's residential parking standards. Based upon these requests, the Planning Commission directed the staff to review the standards and to present our findings and recommendations to the Commission. At the Planning Commission meeting of June 8, 1983, the Planning Staff presented a report and a draft ordinance for amendments to the residential parking standards. The draft ordinance was distributed among several developers as well as the Building Industry Association. Staff utilized the most recent and up -to -date survey information that was available as well as other studies from sources such as the Urban Land Institute. The attached Planning Commission staff report of June 8, 1983 provides a comparison between the current code requirements and the proposed code requirements. The current parking standards do not take into consideration the size or various types of units. The amendment proposes to require parking spaces based upon the housing type as well as the size of the units based upon numbers of bedrooms. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of June 22, 1983, conducted a public hearing to consider the proposed Ordinance Amendment. The Planning Commission added language to the amendment to require Design Review Committee for use of carports when utilized for conventional single family house types as well as clustered development or semi- detached single family development. The Planning Commission adopted the attached Resolution recommending approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment as proposed in the attached Ordinance. 99 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 83 -04 City Council Agenda July 6, 1983 Page 2 is RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Ordinance No—TB- Res ctf lly mitted, Rick mez ` City lanner i MGR /MV /kep Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of May 25, 1983 Planning Commission Staff Report of June 8, 1983 Planning Commission Staff Report of June 22, 1983 Planning Commission Resolution No. 83 -82 Ordinance No. 123 -B • • loo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C' C G DATE: June 22, 1983 —9; TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -04 - RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS - An ordinance amending 7ection 6 .02 9 b Residential Parking Standards, of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance. BACKGROUND: At the previous Planning Commission meeting of June 8, 1983, the proposed Parking Ordinance amendment was introduced to the Planning Commission for review and discussion. The Commission raised a concern regarding the use of carports for conventional single • family detached dwellings. The current Ordinance lists carports as permitted, subject to Planning Commission approval. There are basically three alternatives for consideration by the Planning Commission with regard to the use of carports: 1. Do not permit carports in conjunction with conventional single family detached dwellings. 2. Permit carports only with approval by the Planning Commission. 3. Permit carports only with the approval by the Design Review Committee. The concerns with carports generally revolve around design and aesthetics. In some instances, a carport may be appropriate when located out of view. In other instances, the use of carports added to the front of an existing structure could be detrimental to the overall design of the structure, as well as the aesthetic integrity of the neighborhood. It is staff's recommendation that carports do require some review and regulation and that the Code should contain some flexibility in the event that carports are appropriate. Therefore, we would recommend that the use of carports be subject to review and approval by the Design Review Committee for both single family conventional dwellings and for clustered developments and semi - detached ,rte single family dwellings. I p I ITEM A Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -04 Planning Commission Agenda June 22, 1983 Page 2 In further review of the proposed Ordinance, staff adjusted the parking ratios for the clustered development category to create more of a breakdown in parking spaces required based on the number of bedrooms. Previously, we proposed that two and three bedroom units be treated equally. In reviewing this with the parking study that has been used, we are recommending that the two and three bedroom figures be separated. Additionally, staff added a sentence under the clustered development category which indicates that on- street visitor parking may be substituted for off - street visitor parking in the cases of single family, zero lot line, patio home developments, and duplexes. This would be allowed only in the event that the appropriate street widths are provided in accordance with adopted engineering street section standards. Staff reviewed several parking ordinances of other cities, as well as parking studies and surveys, and found that the figures and ratios proposed by this Ordinance are the most accurate and closely related to the types of development which the City is currently processing. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment for significant adverse environmental impacts and have not identified any such impacts. Therefore, it is recommended that the Commission recommend adoption of a • Negative Declaration to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all public input on this amendment. If the Commission concurs with the Ordinance as presented, adoption of the attached Resolution which recommends approval of the Ordinance to the City Council would be appropriate. Resgbctful ly submitted, . ,..:'-, ck /Gomez ty Planner �G:MV:ir Attachments: Resolution Of Approval Proposed Ordinance 07'- • n L I ` — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GpCA.Nfpt, STAFF REPORT 112 1977 DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PARKING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BACKGROUND: Based upon Planning Commission direction, staff has prepared the attached Ordinance which amends the residential parking requirements of the Interim Zoning Ordinance. It is intended that the Ordinance be reviewed and discussed by the Commission tonight and that any further direction would be provided to staff for incorporation into the draft Ordinance. A public hearing will be heard before the Planning Commission on June 22, 1983. Staff has given copies of the proposal to the Building Industry Association as well as several developers which previously requested the City to review its current standards. ANALYSIS: The current parking regulations for residential uses asically establishes regulations for two types of residential development: (1) single family dwellings; and, (2) multiple family dwellings. The current code does not differentiate between patio homes, duplexes, or zero lot line developments. The code simply requires two parking spaces in a garage or carport for a single family dwelling and 2.2 spaces per dwelling unit (one in a garage or carport and all others open) for multiple family dwellings. In review of the types of development which are being proposed throughout the City, staff has categorized residential needs into three major classifications: (1) conventional single family; (2) clustered dwellings and semi - detached single family; and, (3) apartments. Within each of these categories, staff has proposed the number of autos required to be in direct relationship to the number of bedrooms. The basis of the actual numbers proposed is from a recent parking study conducted by Barton- Aschman Associates, Incorporated, Traffic Engineers. This firm conducted a comprehensive parking study for the City of Irvine which included a detailed survey of apartment, condominium, and single family residential residents. Based upon the survey information received through this study, the number of spaces proposed are in direct relationship with the actual need of each unit type. j y ITEM K C � Proposed Residential Parking Ordinance Amendment Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 • Page 2 The proposal which staff has developed closely follows the recommendations of the parking survey. The requirement for conventional single family dwellings is proposed to remain the same (2 parking spaces per unit within a garage or carport). For clustered development, semi- detached single family, and mobile home parks, the requirements have been broken down into studio units , one bedroom units, two or more bedrooms. The major difference between staff's proposal and the consultant's recommendation is with regard to guest parking. The consultant's report recommended that in addition to the base requirements, one additional guest parking space would be provided for each unit. Based upon the survey results, staff found no substantive information to require that high of a ratio of visitor parking spaces. Therefore, staff proposes that only one guest parking space shall be provided for every four units. This is different from our current regulation which requires one space for every five units. We have found a higher need for visitor parking within multiple family or clustered developments because of the lack of on- street parking. For apartments, the number of parking spaces for each category of bedrooms is slightly less than what is being proposed for the clustered development category. Additionally, the requirement for guest parking is proposed at one guest parking space for each four unit rather than one for each • five units which the code currently requires. In addition to the changes for required spaces, this proposal also includes a provision to allow up to 50% of the required uncovered spaces to be of compact car size. Survey results from the Irvine survey, as well as surveys conducted within the automobile manufacturing industry, indicates approximately 650 of the automobiles on the road or being manufactured are considered compact car size. Following are two tables: (1) showing current regulations and proposed regulations and (2) showing a comparison on a 200 unit project between current regulations and proposed regulations. E 1r.�I • • C C 0 M JARIS0N TABLE 40USIYG TYPE CURRENT CODE PROPOSE] COOE 1. Conventional Single Pam1y T li 2 covered sae c es 2 covered ;paces 2. Cluster :PVel afinent (ccn dos and to lIS (zero s Eeta:rpas ogle fanny (¢ern :w , patio lo..e s, aupl ewes) and �pbl lePhone Carlo. S. (a) studlu (bl 1 Cedreo- (c) 2 or -ore beEroaas (d) visitor Jar - (e) cc^ec c ` aliowance `or un:pverea spates '.2 ;paces, ',1 vh'ch �'', Is covered 1 S:a,,,,fer', J du. 20: of tre uncovered ]S s ; So covered I Covered space 1.5 scaces; 1 co:e wed 2 spaces: 1 covered 1 sJaCPi av Pfy J 50: of the unc ov- - 3. Apart-ents (a) bdChelc, and 1 b.,i. (b) 2 bedredn (c) 3 Eedrdv, or rare (d; 'n sltpr :ark:-, (e) c ,pace c Z allowance for untave r,E Z pate,. 425 ' 2 spaces, whl,h covered 1.3 spaces; 1 covered 1.6 ; 1 covers 1.] soar es; 1 covered 1 •- :nlevery 5 du. I zmtP /PVery a dd. 20: of uncovered 5O: uncovered OEV E L 0 PV[NT EXAMPLE TABLE II NOUS viG Tv PE CURRENT CODE PROPOSED CODE 1. 200 .,do- nuns (a� 50 1- tedreoes b) loo E- pddraons (cl 5G 3- [edrooms (d) v s to, spates TV,% ILL --.. 400 spaces; 200 ep be coveretl ]S s ; So covered 2D0 spaces: 100 covered IOD spaces; 50 covered el spa Cos Su spaces 440 425 Z. ?SO apa rtvenes (a) 50 1- Eednn -s (S) 190 2- bedrooms (q 50 3- Eedroams (d) viz ROr parking TOR.'. lL-=�40 — ado spaces: 200 [o be covered 65 'pares, 50 covered 16C soa!nsl IId caverec 85 spaces: 50 covered crs 5o spaces aaa 360 RECCMMENDATID'l: It is recommended that the Planning Commission study the proposal, - receive any public input regarding the proposal, and provide direction to staff with regard to any desired changes or additions. Staff will bring back the final proposal to the Planning Commission for public hearing on June 22, 1983. Re4�ectfully,,`submitted, Rick omez Gity Planner Rf;MV:,jr �� C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 25, 1983 1 TO: Members of the Planning Col I isyion i FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner !' SUBJECT: PROPOSED PARKING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT i BACKGROUND: Over the last couple of months, residential building activity has been on the increase and interest for the development of new projects has also increased. We have had several requests by residential developers (see attached letters) to re- examine our residential parking standards. Staff has essentially completed review of its study on the parking standards as part of the new Development Code and has developed a draft parking standards section. Based upon our review of parking studies and other new Ordinances, we have found that our standards are in need of revision in order to maintain standards which are applicable to the various types of residential development. Staff is seeking Commission direction to conduct an amendment to the current ordinance adopting new parking standards for residential development prior to the adoption of the new Development Code. If the Planning Commission concurs with this idea, staff would bring forth a proposed list of amendments for the Planning Commission's consideration at their meeting of June 8, 1983 as a study session. Staff would suggest holding a public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, 1983. Should you have any additional comments or questions prior to the May 25, 1983 meeting, please feel free to contact me at any time. RG:jr Attachments 1 n ITEM L C C a LEWIS HOMES 1156 Noen Mountain Avenue RO, Box 670 Upload, CA v 786 i 714 985 ?i May 15, 1983 NY. Michael Vairin senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Parking standards Dear Mike: We at Lewis Homes would be extremely appreciative if the Planning Commission and City Council would update the City's parking standards now, rather than waiting far the entire new Development Code to be completed and adopted. • I'm sure you are aware, because it has come up so many times over the last several months, that working under the City's present parking standards is causing us tremendous problems. Our need is to start construction on our first projects in Terra Vista as quickly as possible. Because the full Development Code update is still some time off, we have had to design our multifamily and cluster projects to meet the parking standards now on the books. It is terribly frustrating for us as developers to knowingly waste land, cover large areas with pavement, and end up with higher prices or rents that we could otherwise charge, simply to meet a code that we all know is obsolete and will no longer apply within a few months. The ordinance will change soon, but the waste it is causing in our initial developments will continue forever. I know that many other developers share our frustration, because the parking standards, more than any other single factor, dramatically influence multifntsily and cluster site designs. It seems so pointless to design to an obsolete standard that will soon be scrapped. But the other choice - to delay the project until the Development Code is adopted - is even worse. If the parkinq standards could be updated now, immediately, there would still he time for us to adjust our site designs. The result would be greatly improved appearance, efficiency, and liveability in these developments. The complete Development Code is a very complex document and will take some months, to digest, review, and massage into its final form. The parking standards seem to be a relatively isolated element that could be updated imnediate_ly without foreclosing the City's options with regard to the rest of the Development Code standards. � C Mr. Michael Vairin City of Rancho Cucamonga - 2 - May 18, 1983 We do sincerely wish that the City could see its way clear to address • this problem now, and eliminate the unnecessary dilemmas that we and other developers are facing because of it. I cannot think of any other so- simple action that we in the development community would take as a better show of good faith... Sincerely, CC Kay Matlock Project Manager /km i I • • • { { J. E. BUTLER & ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE . DEVELOPMENT . FINANCE G1? May 19, 1983 '. i,;:.`I 1LI .., l,, Ao y5� Tr Mr. Michale Vairin Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Vairin: As you are aware, we are in the process of designing a major new apartment complex on Foothill Boulevard near Vineyard. Our project will include a Recreation Building, Tennis Courts, Pool /Spa Courtyard and extensive landscaping. We have designed, constructed and managed thousands o£ units in many cities throughout California and Arizona. • Our experience suggests that your parking ordinance (2.2 spaces per unit) provides for substantially more parking than is actually needed to serve the residents and guests in an apartment complex. The result is an increase in asphalt and a decrease in useable open space and landscaping. EJ We urge the City of Rancho Cucamonga to consider a change in the parking ordinance. Our specific experience supports a parking ratio of; 1 space per single unit, III spaces per one - bedroom unit, and 2 spaces per two - bedroom unit. This ratio "works" in well designed projects and improves the living environment. Very truly yours, .1. E. BUTLER 4 ASSOCIATES �r Jack ?. Butler JEB:vh Enclosure 243 Media Drive • Los Angeles, California 90049 • Telephone (213) 472 -9913 /n9 J. E. BUTLER & ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE . DEVELOPMENT • FINANCE The following is a list of recreation oriented apartment projects in which Mr. Butler has had a direct involvement in the design, construction and management: Project Name Location No, of Units Oakwood Garden Grove, Calif. 402 Oakwood Mountain View, Calif. 402 Oakwood Sherman Oaks, Calif. 372 Oakwood San Diego, Calif. 564 Oakwood Coronado, Calif. 549 Oakwood Newport Beach, Calif. 732 Oakwood Newport Beach, Calif. 715 Oakwood San Jose, Calif. 789 Oakwood Anaheim, Calif. 768 Oakwood Phoenix, Arizona 556 Oakwood Woodland Hills, Calif. 983 Oakwood Woodland Hills, Calif. 446 Mission Village San Diego, Calif. 251 Sonrisa Pomona, Calif, 220 The Scottsdale Scottsdale, Arizona 179 Los Olivas La Mirada, Calif. 310 243 Medio Drive • Los Angeles, California 90049 • Telephone (213) 472 -9913 //n • • • I • RESOLUTION NO. 83 -32 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOXMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENTMENT NO. 83 -04, RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS WHEREAS, on the 25th day of May, 1983, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an amendment to the residential parking standards; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of June, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing. SECTIO'1 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following figs: 1. That the amendment is warranted in order to provide standards which can be applied to the various housing types that are being constructed; and 2. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impact on the environment; and 3. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this amendment will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on June 22, 1983. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 83 -04. 2. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COM- MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST':'`d/W! N Secretary Irl .c C� Resolution No. 83 -82 Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June, 19?3, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JUAREZ, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL NONE STOUT 1i/ u • • . ORDINANCE NO. 123 -B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.O219(b)(7) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 123, RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 61.0219(b)(7) of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: (7) Residential Uses: (A) Single - family dwellings (conventional). Two (2) parking spaces within a garage or carport. The use of carports requires approval from the Design Review Committee. (B) Cluster development (condominium, townhome, etc.) semi - detached single family (zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.) and mobile is home parks: (I) Studio: 1.3 off - street parking space per unit in a garage or carport. (II) One (1) bedroom: 1.5 off - street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. ri (III) Two (2) bedrooms: off - street parking spaces per unit, of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. (IV) Three (3) or more bedrooms: Two off - street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. (V) In addition to the required number of parking spaces for each unit, one off- street uncovered parking space shall be provided for each four units for visitor parking. For single family zero lot line, patio homes, and duplexes, " on- street parking may be substituted for visitor parking. -;,, Ordinance No. Page 2 E (VI) For developments containing five or more units, up to fifty percent of the required uncovered spaces may be compact car size. (VII) The use of carports requires approval from the Design Review Committee. (C) Apartments: (I) Bachelor and one bedroom dwelling unit: 1.3 off - street parking spaces for each dwelling unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport for each unit. (II) Two (2) bedroom dwelling units: 1.6 off - street parking spaces for each dwelling unit of which one space shall be covered for each unit. (III) Three (3) bedrooms or more dwelling units: 1.7 off - street parking spaces for each dwelling unit of which one • space shall be covered for each unit, plus 0.2 off - street parking space for each bedroom in excess of three (3). (IV) In addition to required number of parking spaces for each unit, one (1) guest parking space shall be required for each four (4) units. (V) For building sites containing five (5) or more dwelling units, up to fifty (50) percent of the required open parking spaces may be of compact car size. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment and issues a Negative Declaration for this Amendment. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the- same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 10- • • 31 STAFF REPORT DATE: duly 6, 1983 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 1977 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO MOOIPY CONDITIONAL USE PERM T 81-04 - VINEYARD BANK A request to expand their existing mo ular facilities with an additional 926 square feet, related parking, and an extension of time. SUMMARY: An appeal has been filed by Gilbert Rodriguez, the owner of the real estate being utilized by the Bank for their temporary facilities. Mr. Rodriguez is appealing the Commission's decision because the he contends approval was given without his knowledge or consent. BACKGROUND: It is the Planning Division's practice to require either the property owner's signature on the application or a letter authorizing the applicant to act as his agent. In this case, neither of these two options was provided with the Bank's application. Staff contacted the Bank expressing their need for this authorization in order to proceed with the approval process. The Bank was unable to aquire Mr. Rodriguez's approval prior to the public hearing. Staff recommended continuance of this item at the May 25, 1983 public hearing. The Bank's attorney presented a copy of the lease agreement to the City Attorney. Based on the City Attorney's opinion, because of the nature of the lease agreement, in this case a ground lease, any additional approval by the property owner was unnecessary, since his signature was on the original Conditional Use Permit. The Commission proceeded with this item and approved the Bank's request. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the modification of Conditional Use Permit 81 -04, based on the findings within their Resolution and the information provided to them at their public hearing on May 25, 1983 concerning this item. R tfylly^bmitted, anner ents: May 25, 1983 Planning Commission Staff Report May 25, 1983 Planning Commission Minutes Correspondence 17 n u 0 0 • [J STAFF REPORT DATE: May 25, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -04 - VINEYARD NATIONAL SO ' - A regest to exp an existing mo ular banK building by adding an additional 936 square feet and related parking; plus requesting an extension of time for the time limits on the modular building. This facility is located at 8158 Vineyard Avenue. SUMMARY: Attached is a written description provided by the bank which explains their need for expanding their current temporary facility. Additionally, the bank has found that they are not in a position to construct a permanent facility on this site and requests an extension of time for approval of the Conditional Use Permit. BACKGROUND: Conditional Use Permit 81 -04 was originally approved by the Commission on March 25, 1981, as listed in Resolution 81 -33. Those conditions of approval gave a one -year approval date and the requirement for submission of permanent building plans. Subsequently, on August 25, 1982, the Planning Commission approved Resolution 82 -79 which extended the expiration date to September 15, 1983 and amended the condition for the submission of permanent plans. Attached as Exhibit "B" is the existing approved site plan and the current physical layout of the site. Attached as Exhibit "C" is the proposed site plan showing the additions to the modular facility and the relocation of the displaced parking on the south side of the site. ANALYSIS: The additions are proposed to be of the same exterior uiT id g materials and will be constructed in a fashion to blend with the existing facility. The proposed elevations are shown in Exhibit "D ". No other changes in the facility or site are proposed at this time. The total amount of parking required for this facility would be 23 parking stalls and the site plan indicates a total of 25 parking stalls. r' G ITEM C Modification of CUP 81 -04 /Vineyard National Bank Planning Commission Agenda May 25, 1983 Page 2 In addition to the expansion of the facility, the applicant is requesting an extension of time for keeping the modular units on this site. The current expiration of this approval is September 15, 1983. The applicant has requested an additional one -year extension. However, the applicant has indicated that they have a five -year lease on the property and would prefer to have approval to coincide with the termination of that lease, which is in 1986. If the Commission concurs that an extension of time is appropriate, amendment of condition number two of Resolution 82 -79 would also be required or eliminated. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all public input. Resolution 82 -79 -A has been provided for your review. The dates for a new expiration date have been left blank for your action. tfully submitted, ick G6mez'✓ ity Manner RG:MV:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Resolution 81 -33 Resolution 82 -79 Exhibit "B" - Existing Approved Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Proposed Building Elevations Resolution 82 -79 -A 11-1 • is • J C E C C CITY OF RANCl10 CUCAMONGA PLANNING �r n,;.\1: a I -O4- TITLE: _ LOCA-TION Mf�p rxlmlrr:� sc,u.e. �oirrti Reference: CUP 81 -04 At the present time the Bank is located at 8158 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and has accupancy of a 5 unit modular building consisting of 3600 sq.ft. on approximately 30,000 sq.ft. of land. Our present Conditional Use permit has been renewed one time and now expires on /or about September 15, 1983. At the time the last extension was granted which was on August 20, 1982 the condition was that if a permanent facility was desired on our site then appropriate plans were to be submitted within 9 months from September 15, 1982, The City must understand that Vineyard National Bank does not own the property, we merely have a 5 year lease on the land we are using. We have no control over the development of the entire parcel, however we are continually negotiating with the property owner to allow the bank to purchase the property. We can not force him to sell it, however in the mean time we are forced to expand our facility to accomodate our customer base. Since the addition being added at this time will match the existing building we foresee no problem with our request. 40 In addition and based upon the fact that we have not been able to consummate the purchase of the land, we would ask at this time that our existing Conditional Use permit be extended for a minimum time • period of one year from its present expiration date. • j RESOLUTION NO. 81 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CON!IISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -04 FOR A TEMPORARY BAN /, LOCATED 180 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL ON WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD IN THE C -2 -7 ZME 41HEREAS, on the 6th day of February, 1981, a complete application was filed by Vineyard Bank for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Coi�,mission held a public hearing to consider the ahove- described project. N0,1, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts onthe environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 25, 1981. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -04 is approved suojectt the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLdTM NG DIVISION 1. The temporary Bank facility is approved for a one -year Period from occupancy and shall be removed from the site and the site appropriately rostored, unless an extension of time in accordance with Commission policy Is is apornved I%() E 0 C 0 RESOLUTIOil NO. 62 -79 A PESOLUTION OF THE RAIICHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CV,- IISSiON APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PER"IT NO. 81 -04 ;lHEREAS, an application has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 61.0219(o)88 of the Zoning Ordinance; and oHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described project; and SidEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described project. SECT! ON 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following fi r,d ings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a lack of financing and high interest rates for construction; . B. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; C. That external physical conditions have caused delay in the start of construction; D. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code; E. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a ti;te extension for the above- described project as follows: Conditional Use Permit New Expiration Cate_ 81 -04 September 15, 1983 SECT-1-0"I 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby amends Resolution `io. l -33, Section 3, Condition No. 2 to read as follows: 2. If a permanent facility is desired on this site, then appropriate plans must be submitted within Is 9 months from September 15, 1982 to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and be under construction prior to the new expiration of approval for the temporary facility, including 1%i y 1- -- - -- I I �L C�l -- 1wu tsu.e '.>•+,� �+J b' +Leo D P"OP09E0 i� j VINEYARD 1� NATIONAL j- BANK BUhpINO I i j ',I> u 6KHjg(T " Fj" °CATy MAN 0 • MWEIMME ti-L I] u u 11 V Y ff rf I I 1 • V r Z N .......�- n 1i or IL SOO7 F� EIEVATiO bJFSt ELEVATIOA BUXBAUM 5 CHAKMAK o • =.v. �.v- e_- eieO grvin 3288 t7 C1 May 25, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Application of Vineyard National Bark to improve existing improvements on the corner of Foothill and Vineyard, Rancho Gentlemen: Attached please find a copy of the lease agreement which is currently in existence between the owner of the real estate Gilbert Rodriguez and Vineyard National Bank which is leasing the real estate from Mr. Rodriguez. As you can see by a review of the very simple memorandum or letter agreement dated January ?0, 1981 . executed by the parties, the only thing that Mr. Rodriguez is leasing to the Bank is the ground. The Bank is responsible for all improvements to the site per page 2 item 10. This is a ground lease and as a result the landlord Mr. Rodriguez has nothina to say concerning any improvements on the site whatsoever. All the improvements are done in the discretion of the Bank and do not require Mr. Rodriguez's consent whatsoever. Please proceed with the application of the Bank to the Planning Co.mnission for the appropriate consent to erect the applied for improvements. If there are any questions or problems, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, BUi'13AUM -& �Ri�1C,A , A yaw Cot p ra ti,;r';- � EAB:pc Enclosure Ip • L BuxsAuM S CHAKMAK • a0 � �..a. .ae Y G�naE�+ a'i<Ch,iV[Oa^i`n 9'.7 i .,mac ef, 5' .'. �enaN �n E2 ♦�+ January 20, 1981 Mr. Gilbert B. Rodriguez 759 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, California 91786 Re: Lease of Real Property Located at Vineyard and Foothill - Rancho Cucamonga by Vineyard Ntional Ban;: Dear Gil: This letter will serve as a written memorandum of the option you have agreed to give to Vineyard National Bank (in organization) whereby the Bank may lease a portion of the real estate which you own located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • The basic terms of the lease are as follows, all of which are subject to review and acceptance by Comptroller of the Currency: 1. The temporary lease will corunence upon the occupancy of the temporary site of the Bank. The permanent lease will commence upon the occupancy of the permanent Bank building. 2. The permanent lease will terminate twenty five (25) years from the date of commencement. 3. The Bank will have two five year options to renew the permanent lease on the same terms and conditions. Thereafter, the Bank will only have a right of first refusal to lease these premises. 4. The temporary lease will be a ground lease of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of property, the permanent lease will be for more. 5. The Bank will have the full responsibility for obtaining all construction funds for the construction of the temporary quarters of the Bank. G. The Bank will join with you, if appropriate, in obtaining or assisting you in obtaining the permanent financing for the construction of the permanent building for the Bank. Mr. Gilbert B. Rodriguez January 20, 1981 Page Two • These thirty thousand (30,000) feet of rented area will "float ". By this we mean that the thirty thousand (30,000) feet initially will be somewhere towards the northeast corner or the north side of the shopping center on Vineyard or on Foothill at the mutual agreement of the parties, or the anchor tenant, and then for the permanent Bank, upon mutual agreement, the permanent Bank will be at a location mutually agreeable between us as part of the permanent buildinus to be constructed or as a separate permanent building in the center. 8. Tire rent will he Fifteen Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00) per month for thirty thousand (30,000) square feet or any portion of same for the temporary structure plus C.P.I. increase annually not to exceed nine (9) percent of prior year's rent. The rent will be renegotiated at the time of the commencement of permanent lease for the permanent building. 9. The Bank will have a right of first refusal such that if you ever desire to sell the shopping center property or any portion of the shopping center, then the Bank will have the first right to purchase the offered premises at the offered price. 10. Any improvements to the site which the Bank must put in now for its temporary quarters will be paid for by the Bank. The lessor wil only reimburse the Bank for those improvements which will become part of the permanent improvements for the center once the center has been constructed in its final form. The lessor will not reimburse the Bank for any improvements if they must be altered or removed in any material substantial way for the final development. 11. If the shopping center is not built within three (3) years of the date of this letter, then the lease will be cancelled at the Bank's option. 12. The Bank will agree to commence construction on a permanent building on or before the perrlenent full sopping center has co:.menced con- struction. The Bank agrees to complete its permanent building on or before the time that the anchor tenant part of the center will be completed in its final permanent form. As you are aware, since you are a proposed director and since you are an organizer of the Vineyard National Bank, the rental value price of the land must be at a price no greater than the market value in the area since all agreements including this letter are subject to review by the Comptroller of the Currency. • 1:21 Mr. Gilbert B. Rodriguez •January 20, 1981 Page Three The basic terms of the lease are set forth in this letter, but we agree that all other specific terms and conditions of the lease will he worked out at some future time when we are more definite about the opening date of the Bank. If this letter correctly sets forth the basic terms of your agreement to lease to the Bank, I would appreciate it if you would sign the bottom of this letter indicating your acceptance of these basic terms. Mr. Bert C. Francis will sign on behalf of the Vineyard National Bank Organizing Committee. Very truly yours, BUXBAUM BAfCP1AiC A Law Co, xa ti6h DAVID A. BUXBAUM • DAB:pc Acc BERT FRANCIS, Vice Chairman of Vineyard National Bank Organizing Commi -tee, Lessee Accepted by: GILBERT B. RODRIGUVI-11he ssor VI 2, C ACENOWLFDGEMENT (SECTION 1195 CIVIL CODE) State of California SS. County of Los Angeles ) On C 1983, before me, Susan M. Foster, a notary public, person y appeared DAVID A. BUXBAUM, known to me to be the witness whose name is subscribed to the within instrument ane acknowledged to me that GILBERT B. RODRIGUEZ, the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as a party, is the person described in it, that said person executed it in said witness' presence, and that said witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness. I SEAL SUSAN M FOSTER c� (Seal) . ", . `T I PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN �lfrlQiXi // � LOS ANCELES CCUN-,Y Notary Public for the State ;e:r.;S" I9. I9e4 of California ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (SECTION 1195 CIVIL CODE) State of California SS. County of Los Angeles ) 1983, before me, Susan M. Foster, a On ppea notary public, persona y red DAVID A. BUXBAUM, known to me to be the witness whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that BERT C. FRANCIC, as Vice Chairman of Vineyard National Bank Organizing Committee, the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as a party, is the person described in it, that said person executed it in said witness' presence, and that said witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness. 1 2 1 Notary Public for the State of California • • • -�, OF FIG 4L SEA SUSAN M, FOSTER (Seal) '. na *ART PUecc.cAUFOenia�L V c,, PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY I[l MY M.1111i51PN "FIFES nC I9, 15ei 1 2 1 Notary Public for the State of California • • • •ACKNOk LEDGEMENT (SECTION 1195 CIVIL CODE) State of California 1 SS. County of Los Angeles ) On `''� ;,(;' , 191R, before me, Susan M. Foster, a notary public, persPri lly appeared BERT C. FRANCIS, Vice Chairman of Vineyard National tank Organizing Committee, known to me (or proved to me on the oath of DAVID A. BUXBAUM) to be one of the Parties that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that GILBERT B. RODRIGUEZ and the Vineyard National Bank Organizing Committee, and each of them, are the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument as parties thereto, that each of said parties are described in the within instrument, that each of said parties executed the within instrument, and that he subscribed his name thereto. (Seal) OFF' L: SE EBS7 q�I F'! SUSAN IAL M. ER "m -F BY PUBLIC . CAOFrNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN L' LOS ANGELES COUNTY tfY CB'/NISS!CN E%P "I2ES NOV 19. 19" State of California Notary Public for the State of California ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SS. County of Los Angeles ) On 1563, before me, Susan M. Foster, a notary public, perso lly appeared BERT C. FRANCIS, known to me (or proved to me on the oath of DAVID A. BUXEAUM) to be the Vice Chairman of Vineyard National Bank Organizing Committee, and acknowledged to me that the Vineyard National Eank Organizing Committee executed the same. OFFICIAL SEA (Seal) M. FOSTER IIOFA" PUBLIC.CAIIFOBNIA F\� PR RJC PAL OFFICE IN LOS g40ELE5 CO UfJ iY ,ter ra RtuSq'I. !X.wfS NO ^. 19. 1961 N����� Notary Public for the State of California 1? 6 ANDERSON. TAVES AND REEVER AT7 NEYS A' e... �o....L„- s Ueinrc, CAl✓OONin June 7, 1983 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Re: Appeal of C.U.P. C.U.P. No. 81 -04- Vineyard Bank Our Client: Gilbert Rodriguez Gentlemen: 1 v oca o -a., 17 11 ee5-a6.3 Please be advised that this office represents Mr. Gilbert Rodriguez the fee owner of the real property located at 8158 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. By this letter, you are hereby advised that Mr. Rodriguez does • hereby appeal the findings and order granted by the Planning Commission on May 25, 1983, with regard to the modification request for the above numbered Conditional Use Permit. Also enclosed is our client's check in the sum of $12-0:00 which represents the filing fee for that appeal.. You are advised that the basis for this appeal is that the request for modification was made without the knowledge or permission of !,it. Rodriguez, the land owner. Very truly yours, ANDERSON, TAVES & REEVER . BY: 4ICI MiD y AND RSON RGA:rmv cc: Mr. Rodriguez • . Motion: Moved by Me Niel, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -110A, with an amendment to the resolution to require a replacement agreement rather than Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association. PhBLIC H-- ART "GS C. MODPICATIO.`: OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -o4 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK - A request to expand existing modular bank building by adding an additional 936 square feet and related parking; plus requesting an extension of time for the time limits on the modular building. This facility is located at 8158 Vineyard Avenue. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. He stated that the current City ordinance governing the issuance of Conditional Use Permits requires consent of the legal property owner, or in the event that the applicant, is not the legal property owner, a statement from the legal owner that the applicant is the authorized agent for the property. MN. Vairin stated that such consent or authorization has not yet been received and therefore the applicant cannot proceed. Mr. Dougherty stated that the applicant's attorney has just furnished a letter to him for his review in which the first paragraph refers to a letter dated January 20, 1961 would give authorization to the applicant. He asked for time • to review the letter and asked that this item be deferred to later in the agenda. C. MODiF.CATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -14 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK A request to expand existing modular bank building by adding an additional 936 square feet and related parking; plus requesting an extension of time for the time limits on the modular building. This facility is located at 8158 Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Dougherty stated that the firm of Buxbaum and Chakrakhas provided a letter which he read; however, the question remains whether Mr. Rodriquez, the owner of the property has any say in this. Further, the letter states that the bank is responsible for all temporary improvements and the lessor is responsible only and will reimburse for those improvements which will become part of the permanent improvements. He indicated that it is the interpretation of M_^. Bux Laum that the landlord does not have anything to say. Yr. Dougherty questicm ;d whether the improvements that the bank wants to make are temporary or whetner they are considered permanent. Mr. Vairin replied that the improvements will be temporary. I >> Z M.r• Dougherty stated that under the circumstances, it would appear that this is corrcnt and that "M. Rodriquez' approval is not required on those improvements. Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 25, 1983 I >> Z Mr. Vairin stated that in that case, if the Planning Commission chooses to move forward, there are two blanks for a new expiration date and asked the • Commission if they wished to continue this extension on an annual basis or make an extension that would be consistent with the lease. Commissioner Barker asked how long an extension date would the Commission be allowed to g;e. Chairman Re=el replied that it could be extended indefinitely but the Commission has not granted any beyond two years. Mr. Vairin stated that there is no limitation on an interim use and from a policy standpoint this project has been granted the longest extension. Chairman Rempel stated that there should be a longer term than one year but there should be another condition placed on the project which states that if another modification or building is done it would bring the conditional use permit back to the Planning Commission, and if any development should occur it would spur the permanent facility. Mr. Vairin replied that the Commission can modify any condition of approval on the original resolution and if they wished to key in under section 3, the date could also be modified. Chairman Rempel stated that it is not a good procedure to mix temporary with permanent modifications. Commissioner Stout asked what would be used to trigger it. . Chairman Rempel replied that it could be done if the permit were pulled, any part of the center began to develop, or if the plans were given to the Building and Safety Division. Mr. Vairin stated that he could provide the language for this. Commissioner Stout asked if the expiration date of the ground lease is known. Chair= Re -pet opened the public hearing. Mr. Steve Sensor, ^,ach, the applicant, stated that they have been in negotiation with the property owner for about a year. He indicated that they will continue negotiation but were unable to do so at this time. Mr. Sens"embach stated that the existing ground lease is indefinite but they have been given 5 years by the board of directors of the bank and they desire to develop the property. Further, that it is necessary that they expand the building now. Planning, Commission Minutes -5- hIay 25, 1983 • . Cor�u ssioner Stoat stated that the bank has a ground lease that can go longer than 5 years and asked if it includes the right to develop that particular corner of the shopping center. Additionally, what was the expiration date of that five year period. M_r. Sensentacn replied that it will expire in September 1986. There bein; no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Coono ss!oner Stout stated that he sees no reason to bring this back on an annual basis inasmuch as the expiration date of the ground lease could be the triggering mec'canism. pIotion: ;hued by Stout, seconded by has Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt P•esoluticn No. 82 -79A, approving the modification of Conditional Use Permit No. 81-G4, with a modification to the resolution language to allow expiration of the CUP to coincide with the ground lease in September 1986. F. :• a NV;R01a ♦ :MEN'..AL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 83 -06 - KINDSRCdRF, - The development of a 6400 square foot child care center for Ki2crcare Child Learning Center, Inc., on 1,1 acres of land in the C -2 zone, located at 10100 E. Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-331-21. G. EN'✓_i;CP!ENT,V ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7891 - KINDERCARE LEARNING • CZNT''_nn "S, is ;C. - A division of 2.9 acres into 2 parcels within the C -2 zone locaoeu at 10100 E. Foothill Boulevard - APN 208- 331 -21. (Related File: CUP 83 -06) City Plannar, nick Gomez, reviewed the staff report. He recommended that two additional conditions be incorporated in the conditions of approval: the earth tone fiberglass roofing material proposed on the main building shall he used on the entrance cupola; and brick veneer detailing shall be provided on all exterior elevations. The use of T1 -11 cedar plywood shall not be allowed. Relative to the parcel map, he indicated that the subdivision of parcel `;o, 1 would create an approximate 1.2 acre parcel. Coeiissioner Stoat asked if the block wall belongs to the property owner of parcel 9337. Mr. Gomez replied that he. believed it was built in conjunction with the adjacent property. Commasl.ener Oaccer stated that he has some concern with access from Foothill, getting care into the parking lot and dropping children off at the school. Be asked if any adiast- ,,unto had been made. Nr. Ocmez rep; ied that they have been made and they will have a shared driveway. il Planning Commission Minutes J �i M May 25, 1983 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -79A f� A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING AN EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -04 AND AN EXPANSION OF BUILDING AREA LOCATED AT 8158 VINEYARD AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed by the Vineyard National Bank for a time extension and building expansion for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 61.0219(o)8B of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission previously conditionally approved the above- described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be inconsistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. S. That the granting of said time extension or building . expansion will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for the above - described project as follows: Conditional Use Permit New Expiration Date 81 -04 September 15, 1986 SECTION! 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby amends Resolution No. d1-33, Section 3, Condition No. 2 to read as follows: 2. If a permanent facility is desired on this site, then appropriate plans must be submitted 3 months prior to August 15, 1986, or at the time of development review for any other portion of this site (whichever comes first). These plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and be under construction prior to the now expiration of approval for the temporary facility, including more precise plans for the shopping center. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY, 1983. • 13 �' • Resolution 82 -79A Page 2 PLANNPlG COMMISSION OF THE —MTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: /W/-, f �i H;r „xanitempei, ATTEST: I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, REMPEL • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CCMMISSIONERS: NONE 0I 7, '�' E • D 01M V n V n n wrrrrn rnr n artnnrr n STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner C C9 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -03 - An amendment to the residential use standards to allow for second dwelling units on single family zoned residential lots. 1977 SUAMARY: During the recent City Council adoption of Ordinance 204 to allow for second dwelling units, it was not clear whether the motion included staff's recommendation regarding parking requirements. Therefore, staff is bringing this item back with a proposed amendment for the City Council's review and consideration. ANALYSIS: The Ordinance, as adopted, would permit the use of temporary /removable structures as a second unit if occupied by a senior citizen (60 years of age or over) with a Conditional Use Permit. It was intended that the parking requirement of the Zoning Ordinance (2 covered spaces) be reduced for these units based upon their temporary nature. With the completion of the parking survey in conjunction with the Senior Housing Overlay District, it would seem reasonable to reduce parking requirements for second units occupied by a senior citizen. The requirement of two covered spaces could present a significant cost /space barrier to this alternative housing concept. Therefore, staff would recommend that subsection (f) be reworded as follows: (f) The unit shall provide parking and access pursuant to Section 61.0219(b), except temporary /removable structures shall provide one (1) off - street parking space. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council amend Ordinance 204 taroug'n adoption of the attached Ordinance 204 -A. Resoec tfully? submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner i RG:DC:jr Attachments: Ordinance 204 Ordinance 204 -A 71 • ORDINANCE NO. 204 AN CRDI4A!;CE OF :fL CITY COOt;CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGR, CALIFORNIE, AMERDI, SECTION 61.024A (b) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDNANCE TO AL-1.04 FOR SECOND OAELLING UN^5 IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES does The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, ordain as fell...: Interim SECTION 1 i6a Ornance n hereby amended by adding sobaa.ti.O 61.024A (6)(8), to Zoning di read as follows: (8) Second dwelling units; A second duelling unit ma be construsted, or attached to, a primary residence on a legal lot of record, containing an existing single family detached residence, subject to the following criteria: 6e (a) required pursuant to Section 611.02[ hall 119( )s m (b) The use of temporary /removable atructures shall be limited to the sole occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60 years of age or ever, related to the occupants of primary residence by blood, marriage, or adoption. Further, said structure shall be restricted to the area at the rear of the primary residence and • _ Adequately screened from public view from the street, (c) no unit in not for sale, but for rental purposes only, or use by a member of the immediate family. (d) The unit does not exceed 640 square feet. (e) The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main residence. (f) The unit shall provide parking and access pursuant to Section 61.0219 (b). (g) The unit construction shall conform to the setback and coverage requirements applicable to accessory buildings or additions to main rem ids... in the zone designation in which the unit is lasted. J (h) The nit may ra,i, areKtactural review, pursuant to Ordinance 89, as determired City planner. (1) The appll Cant shall cobalt to the Building, and Safety Civ;sion written Certificatlan from the affected water and s r distrut that adequate ter ani s er fanilitt.s are or will be water w a:lablr in at, the proposed unit. For an,c v., o4 septic r,silitiea allowable by the Ordinance No. 204 Page 2 • Santa Ana Regional Cualtty Control Board and the City, written certif icaelen of acceptability including all supportive Information shall De submitted. S- —CH 2: The City Council of the City of Raneha Cucamonga, Ca ltfornla, hereDy finds that this Amendment x111 not cause si,hirtuanc adverse Impacts on the environment and issues a Negative Declaration ror thin Amendment. =-'01 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Lerk shall cause the same to be puDllshed within fifteen (15) days arter zte passage at least once in The Daily Rmert, a newspaper of general circ.latlaa published in the City or Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cuca:enga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this tat day of June, 1993. AYES: Dahl, Bu9uet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikela NOES: None ABSENT: None /.lye D. Mike l, Mayor ATTEST: (� r "Lauren M. uasscrxaraah, City Clerk J • 1 J I • ORDINNANCE NO. 204 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 204, REGARDING PARKING REQ'JIRE:dENTS FOR SECOND DUELLING UNITS IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follo.as: SECTION 1: Section 1, Subsection (f) of Ordinance No. 204 is hereby amended to read as follows: (f) The unit shall provide parking and access pursuant to Section 61.0219(b), except temporary removable structures shall provide one (1) off - street parking space. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk .11 Jon D. Mike s, Mayor 1 `1�k 0 11 L J .'D STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983, TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner G CVV-. 11 ,1, %, C 0 r I- U IV,7 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - An amen ment to the In ustrial Area Specific Pan regarding development standards for interim uses. SUMMARY: At the Planning Commission's request, staff has prepared an amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan to permit the interim use of land prior to full development. The Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on June 8, 1983 to consider the amendment and recommended approval of the amendment and Negative Declaration. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes which fully describe the amendment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and a copy of the Staff Report was sent to the Chamber of Commerce. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this amendment. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 83 -01 through adoption of theiatt achedesolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. ty Pla :OC:jr ts: Planning Commission Staff Report & Resolution Minutes of June 8, 1983 Planning Commission Meeting Initial Study, Part I City Council Resolution 1W 0 • .'a 11-11 11 n � r.n.rn 110 n n,rnwrn n STAFF REPORT Z F4� :Z 19'9 -- DATE: June 8, 1983' TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 8 - An amen ment to the Industrial Area Specific Pan regarding development standards for interim uses. Sux'IARY: This report discusses interim land uses within the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP) area. Recently, staff received a request from a property owner wanting to utilize a site on an interim basis (5 years) as a recreational vehicle storage facility. The ISP currently does not contain regulations which would permit interim uses of land without compliance with the development standards. At the Commission's request, staff has prepared this report and proposed amendment for temporary and interim uses within the Plan area. ANALYSIS: It would seem reasonable to allow interim uses on a temporary basis prior to development. One of the primary objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan is to encourage development by eliminating uncertainty of time and money. However, the ISP is intended to also promote attractive and high quality design. Therefore, there are two issues to be dealt with: (1) what interim development standards/ improvements should be required; and, (2) how to insure that ultimate development occurs in accordance with ISP regulations. Minimum standards for landscaping and screening can be developed which meet the design objectives of the ISP. Even as an interim use of land, staff would recommend compliance with grading and drainage, street improvement requirements, and other improvements necessary for the public safety, health, and general welfare of the community and surrounding properties. Staff has provided a suggested list of interim use development standards in the attached Resolution. Ultimately, the standards would have to be met within a given period of time or the use removed in order to retain the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan. Interim uses should not be allowed as a means to circumvent the standards of the ISP. A Conditional Use Permit would be the best process by which the Commission can retain the authority over removal of the interim use and the ultimate development of the land ) L/ % Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 83 -01 June 8, 1983 Page 2 • in conformance with the ISP. Staff would recommend an initial two (2) year approval, with extensions up to a maximum of five (5) years, At the end of the five years, the use would be considered permanent and compliance with standards or removal of the use would be required. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Study and found that this amendment will not result in any significant adverse impacts upon the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and a copy of the staff report was sent to the Chamber OT Commerce. To date, no correspondence either for or against this amendment has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and consider all public input. If the Commission is satisfied with the proposed amendment, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. Respectfully submitted, -- 9 • ty Planner :DC:jr Attachments: April 27, 1983 Staff Report Minutes of April 27, 1983 Planning Commission Meeting Initial Study, Part I Resoluton is 1 y� L • P CITY OF RANCHO CUCLIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 27, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner GUCA. \7Vi 9 M,-1 SUBJECT: A REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION FOR DE OPMENT FF A REUE 1UNAL VLHikLr STORA E YARD PROPO E TO B'CToCATM7T-U7 HELMS AVENUE - A.W. DAVIES, INCORPORATED SUMMARY: Albert W. Davies, a general engineering contractor who owns property located in Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP) on the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and 9th Street, has requested direction regarding the development of an interim use of that site. Mr. Davies is considering utilizing the site on an interim basis as a recreational vehicle storage facility without developing the site to the required minimum landscaping and screening standards as outlined in the ISP. Staff has spoken with Mr. Davies about this and has indicated that the ISP currently does not contain regulations which would permit interim uses of land without compliance with the development standards. Therefore, staff has recommended that this item be brought before the Planning Commission to obtain their direction regarding the options available for the Commission to consider. Generally, there are two alternatives available to the Commission: 1. Require the development of the site to be in conformance with the minimum Industrial Specific Plan standards for landscaping and screening; or, 2. Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan for consideration by the Planning Commission which would provide a mechanism for reviewing interim uses along with interim standards in the industrial area prior to permanent industrial development. BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the letter from Mr. Davies which explains his request and intentions for the development of this site. Also attached is a copy of the site plan which indicates his basic idea regarding the interim use of the facility for a recreational vehicle storage yard. Planning Commissi[( Direction /A.W. Davies April 27, 1983 Page 2 The applicant's proposal has raised this issue the development standards as prescribed by the for Subarea 3. A storage use of this nature and approval of a Conditional Use Permit by th e would require such improvements as: C because it does not meet Industrial Specific Plan would require the review Planning Commission and 1. Twelve percent (12 %) of the lot to be landscaped. 2. All storage areas shall be screened from public view by a concrete or masonry wall. 3. An average landscape setback shall be provided along 9th Street and Helms Avenue at an average depth of twenty -five (25) feet as measured from the face of the curb. As can be seen, the applicant's interim development would not meet the landscaping and screening standards of the Industrial Plan. The Industrial Plan presently does not contain a mechanism which would allow deviation from these standards, even as an interim use. If the Commission sees the need for having flexibility to allow interim uses in the industrial area prior to actual permanent development, staff could prepare an amendment for consideration by the Planning Commission which would essentially permit interim uses to be reviewed by the Planning Commission through a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, we could establish some minimum time frames and standards such as the applicant has suggested with regard to chainlink fencing with slats and some landscaping for screening which continues to meet the design objectives of the ISP. Even as an interim use of land, staff would recommend that such a project should still comply with other standards such as grading and drainage, street improvements, and other improvements necessary for the public safety, health, and general welfare of the community and surrounding properties. These areas could be adequately addressed through the normal development review process which would require the applicant to develop the appropriate plans to show conceptual drainage and grading plans. The critical issue is the ultimate improvement of the site. The standards of the Industrial Specific Plan would have to be met within a given period of time in order to retain consistency with the type of development projected by the Industrial Specific Plan. A Conditional Use Permit process would be the best process by which the Commission can retain the authority over the removal of the interim use and the ultimate development of the land in conformance with the Industrial Specific Plan. J \J J `J • • Planning Commissir( Direction /A.W. Davies April 21, 1983 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission discuss this matter and provide direction to the applicant and staff with regards to the two alternatives discussed in this report. Resbectfully Planner RG:MV:jr Attachments: Letter From Albert W. Davies Dated April 6, 1983 Exhibit "A" - Proposed Site Plan M. C ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR GoNinecfon 11G[M[ #$A 336639 • 8737HELMSAVENUE • POST OFFICE BOX 215 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 989 -3714 (714) 98948154 April 6, 19.93 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 3aseline Road Suite "C" Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 City of Rancho Cucamongu Planning Commission Subject R, V. Storage, Location Ninth Street a Nelms Ave, Attention: Jack Lam Gentlemen, We would like to offer for your consideration our plan to utilize our property including the exist- ing building located at 8737 Helms Ave, (southeast corner or Ninth u Helms) for an R. V. Storage and a • Retail Store for R. V. Supplies. oriGinally this site was planned for industrial build Lags, uut due to economic conditions and excessive vacancies in our area this is not leasable at this time, 'de�ve found through research that the city has a ncad for R. V. Storage and additional facilities such as we're going', to offer. Geographically this anncars to be a desirable location, convenient for those whom would elect to use it. This would put our now vacant land to r_.00d use, along with generating more jobs and revenue for the city. At this time we seek your direction before pro - ce(;dinr• ariv further. '.ic interpret screenini; in the : ;rocD is plans as bloc", wall. At this time needless to snv Lt: is very eRpensive for a new business. ) 41 ?:rive existing ., nerimoter six &ME mom chain Mi., `r...cr. thrat ee o :ouL: Li ;:e to ^aintain and reluesc in- stalli::; red wood.t•rpe slats for serceninFt. .lnca -h:r ronon for not h,avinr, the block wall ac this tire, would De in the event the d, v. 3usinnss did no% y. camp rrcfitable,.ae would resort bac:c to the orip,i,•:r i p L.cs ant'' 'build industrial buildinns on this p:np,3rny. t ^et time there .could be no need Eor the block w.cll. .;e Would have to remove it to comply with future Centtively w*e mould raluest a carinnce for in ',) five years. At the end of this period he would co r,r,1� With t!:e city's reluirercent. i!opQiull,y if the business is sucessiui we co�:la loo .': Ear expansion to %he balance of the property on Lho south to the railroad right of 'way. '.Je present'... own Erox 3inrh Sc. to the railroad on the sa.r.:h and all the property cm:ld Up taken into consideration inr the roaster plan. A h,vo been in business and residence in the • :r ;c:c,onra are.r ,: „pod ntr;rbor of years ane look for- to :atny more. "h:rr'.: you for ,vo,n- cons id er.0 io:.. �1':JJ/ srl I ;inccrely, r� INV t uer,. :!. Javies J Lll ,> Mc, a1a 0 CITY OF ITEM: R:1 \CI IO CLC:INIO \Gz\ Trrl•I:,: p�oP _ p�AN PLANING DIVISION' VNIIMrr SCALE: (�-r 1 • i v I Iq 1 n I,i d ui A 4 i 1,1 y {{ y 3 A I I Mc, a1a 0 CITY OF ITEM: R:1 \CI IO CLC:INIO \Gz\ Trrl•I:,: p�oP _ p�AN PLANING DIVISION' VNIIMrr SCALE: (�-r 1 • c � • which could not be built on could be transferred to adjoining lands owned by the same owner. Further, this must be a contiguous piece of property and cannot be transferred from one area to another. Commissioner Stout asked for clarification of the County's overall density bonus program. - Mr. Stevens replied that the County's position is that 100 -120% of the median is allowed to go up to 50% density bonus. He explained that low or moderate income housing could go up to 100% density bonus. This is a major policy of the County and a major issue of many cities. He pointed out that the most likely area for affordable housing would be the area south of the power lines, to 26th Street. Further, he was not suggesting affordable housing; however, was not an issue that could be eliminated in the Plan. Chairman Rempel invited public comment on this item. Pam Henry, Rancho Cucamonga resident, addressed the Commission stating that she was concerned with the lack of a trails policy in the Plan. She suggested that the Commission recommend direction to the County establishing a trails plan consistent with the City's General Plan. Chris Benoit, Rancho Cucamonga resident, stated her concern that the clustered housing proposed by the Community Plan would not be compatible with the existing and proposed housing in Etiwanda. She suggested that the Commission • look at development in this area and discourage any development that would be incompatible with the City's General Plan. Chairman Rempel thanked the County staff for giving the Commission the opportunity to provide input on the Community Plan. x + x + J VEHI Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report and asked that the Planning Commission provide direction to either require development of the site in conformance with the Industrial Specific Plan standards, or direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan. Chairman Rempel invited Mr. Davies to comment on his request. Mr. Davies stated that this may not be the potential use for this piece of property and felt that the expense of a screening wall would be too great if the business did not survive and the fence had to be torn down. Planning Commission Minutes -11- April 27, 19133 )S0 C i rChairman Rerpel stated that the ISP does not contain a storage type of use • other than a contractor's yard. Further RV storage yards, or any type of public storage, are not addressed in the General Plan or the Industrial Specific Plan. Mr. Gomez stated that Table III -1 contains uses for auto fleet storage, which staff interpreter as consistent with RV storage with a Conditional Use Permit with minimum landscape standards. Further, the issue is not the use, but the amendment regarding the application under temporary or interim uses. Chairman Rempel stated that that the 12% interior landscaping which is required under fleet storage should be examined because it may not be necessary in a use where vehicles are parked. Commissioner Stout stated that there is no way to make a decision unless the Commission decides to consider the possibility of temporary uses and suggested that staff conduct a study showing mitigating factors and alternatives. The Commission could then discuss these and decide whether or not to proceed. He also suggested that street improvements, drainage, and bonding for these improvements should be examined. Mr. Lam pointed out that other uses in the City have provisions for interim or temporary uses. In these temporary uses, all street and drainage improvements are installed. He further stated that the Commission needs to provide Cdirection as to the type of acceptible screening for a temporary use. Commissioner Stout stated that another issue would be if the temporary use is • of such a nature that its size or nature would be in conflict with the permanent use. Mr. Lam responded that this could be mitigated by determining how long the temporary use would be allowed before reaching a permanent status. Chairman Rempel stated that the Commission needs to also decide what types of temporary uses would be allowed. The consensus of the Planning Commission was for staff to conduct a study regarding temporary and inte -im uses within the Industrial Specific Plan area for presentation to the Commission at a later date. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, to continue past the 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. Planning Commission Minutes 151 13- April 27, 1983 • RESOLUTION 10. 83 -OIA A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INTERIM USES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission seeks to provide for interim uses prior to full development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the Industrial Area Specific Plan be amended as follows: SECTION 1: That Part III, Section II (Page 111 -2), Land Use Types, be amended to include interim uses, as follows: Interim Uses The following Interim uses shall be permited, provided that such uses and their locations shall not preclude full development in accordance with the development regulations of the Plan and no permanent buildings are constructed. Agricultural uses, including roadside stands, and private parks and picnic areas are permitted uses prior to development. Parking and storage areas, park- and -ride lots, and other uses similar in charater shall be permitted. A Conditional Use Permit shall be approved for a two (2) year period. Extensions may be granted up to an additional 36 months for a maximum time limit not to extend more than five (5) years beyond the original date of approval. As a condition of approval, an agreement betveen the City and applicant shall be completed stipulating timing, installation of permanent improvements and buildings, and /or restoration of the site to is original condition. At the end of five (5) years, the use shall be removed or the site developed in accordance with full development regulations of the Plan. jc4 Resolution No. 83 -01A Page 2 • SECTION 2: That Part III, Section III (Page III -33), Development Standards, be amenoed to add subsection H, as follows: H. Interim Use Standards The purpose of interim use standards is to establish minimum standards for setbacks, landscaping, screening, and parking which meet the intent of the Plan. Unless specifically modified through the Conditional Use Permit, all other development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall apply, including, but not limited to, grading and drainage, and street improvements. The following standards shall apply in all areas of the Plan: H.I. The minimum streetscape and parking setback requirement shall be contiguous with the ultimate right -of -way line, but in no case less than ten (10) feet. H.2. There shall be no minimum landscape coverage requirement, except that which is necessary for screening purposes as determined by the City • Planner. H.3, All parking and storage areas ;Ball be paved with slag, crushed aggregate, asphaltic concrete or concrete. The location, number and design of said parking shall be in accordance with the Plan. H.4. All parking and storage areas, and other interim uses which require screening as determined by the City Planner, shall be screened from public view through a combination of landscaping and fencing. Fencing may include a 6' chain link fence with slats, masonry or concrete, wood, or decorative metal. Screening must be maintained in good condition at all times. H.5. Landscaping required for screening purposes shall include 15- gallon trees and 5- gallon shrubs to provide a dense landscape buffer to afford maximum screening from the public view, satisfactory to the City Planner. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment and, • ( therefore, recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 15 ?, Resolution No. 83 -01A Page 3 P APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS BTH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE —CIT )OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / , I ! A - /.' an Aem e1, Ohat m r rig._'• Secretary of the Planning I, JACK LM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER, JUAREZ, MCNIEL, REMPEL NOES: COMMIS5IONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ij )5 11 c.rvinU:cat,vrAL AcatasqZN L Anu ranctc MAP /9/2 - PNEUDRAULICS, INC. - A "vision of 8.5 acres into 2 lots within Subarea 3 of the Industrial • Spe is Plan located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue PN 209 - 021 -25. Senior Civil Engines Paul Rougeau, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Rempel stated tha his agenda packet does not contain a map being shown on the screen and Bugg ed that this be coordinated in the future. Chairman Re,.t.el opened the public ring. N.r. Cary Sanderson, Linville and Associat representing the applicant, agreed with all conditions of approval. Mr. Hopson stated that the applicant would split the arcel and would have to encumber this in any event with a deed of trust. ,Motion: Moved by Mc Niel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimou to adopt Resolution No. 83 -81, approving Parcel Map 7972, issuing a Negat Declaration. f ♦ 0 w I. ENVIRO MoNTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN hMENDMENT 83-01 - An amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan regarding development standards for interim use. • City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewed the staff report. He indicated that there would be a language change to Section I of the Resolution to allow the permitted interim uses with the provision that no permanent buildings are constructed. Further, that as a condition of approval, an agreement between the City and applicant shall be completed stipulating timing, installation of permanent improvements and buildings, and /or restoration of the site to its original condition. Commissioner Stout stated his agreement with the changes and asked that the paragraph in Section I be broken down for easier understanding. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Darker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -01A, reco °,mending that the City Council approve these amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan regarding development standards for interim uses. Planning Commission Minutes -10- June 8, 1983 • -) —� C � • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this farm must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Co.:.mittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. • PROJECT TITLE: f,N///�AA.(/_y'�lY.p�g9cca APPLICANT'- NAME, �rnDR S, TELEPHONE: _r an^I-tom O ,grclw 6t Y7'3o 714' g5/ NAME, ADDRESS, TE EPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED tCERNING THIS PROJECT• 1 )n�_P I (alnn, [w hoc i2 OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO -Z 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? flow many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. • CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required e submitted e an adequate evaluattiion .can be made by he p ommittee. Date 24/ 3 signat�re Title i 1-3 i- ! • RESOLUTION NO. * G 5— I I U A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN REG;.RDING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INTERIM USES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did recommend amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan to provide for interim uses; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan. NO'd, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby amend the Industrial Area Specific Plan as follows: SECTION 1: That Part III, Section II (Page 111 -2), Land Use Types, be amended to include interim uses, as follows: interim Uses The following Interim uses shall be • permited, provided that such uses and their locations shall not preclude full development in accordance with the development regulations of the Plan and no permanent buildings are constructed: Agricultural uses, including roadside stands, and private parks and picnic areas are permitted uses prior to development. Parking and storage areas, park- and -ride lots, and other uses similar in charater shall be permitted. A Conditional Use Permit shall be approved for a two (2) year period. Extensions may be granted up to an additional 36 months for a maximum time limit not to extend more than five (5) years beyond the original date of approval. As a condition of approval, an agreement between the City and applicant shall be completed stipulating timing, installation of permanent improvements and buildings, and /or restoration of the site to its original condition. At the end of five (5) years, the use shall be removed or the site developed in accordance with full Is development regulations of the Plan. ,s5 Resolution No. Page 2 • SECTION 2: That Part III, Section III (Page I11I -33), Development Standards, be amended to add subsection H, as follows: Interim Use Standards The purpose of interim use standards is to establish minimum standards for setbacks, landscaping, screening, and parking which meet the intent of the Plan. Unless specifically modified through the Conditional Use Perini t, all other development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall apply, including, but not limited to, grading and drainage, and street improvements. The following standards shall apply in all areas of the Plan: H.1. The minimum streetscape and parking setback requirement shall be contiguous with the ultimate right -of -way line, but in no case less than ten (10) feet. H.2. There shall be no minimum landscape coverage requirement, except that which is necessary for • screening purposes as determined by the City Planner. H.3. All parking and storage areas shall be paved with slag, crushed aggregate, asphaltic concrete or concrete. The location, number and design of said parking shall be in accordance with the Plan. H.4. All parking and storage areas, and other interim uses which require screening as determined by the City Planner, shall be screened from public view through a combination of landscaping and fencing. Fencing may include a 6' chain link fence with slats, masonry or concrete, wood, or decorative metal. Screening must be maintained in good condition at all times. H.5. Landscaping required for screening purposes shall include 15- gallon trees and 5- gallon shrubs to provide a dense landscape buffer to afford maximum screening from the public view, satisfactory to the City Planner. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment and • issues a Negative Declaration for this Amendment. • D nTTV nn+ D n TTOWn OT TO n nnnsrn n STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 197 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Request for Continuance of the Vacation of the Service Road located on the south side of Foothill Blvd. in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista Investments The developer of Parcel Map 6114, William Campbell, has requested that this item be continued until August 3, 1983 at which time the subject parcel map and bonds and agreement and lien agreement will be submitted for Council acceptance. Respectfully submitted, i v v LBH: jaa r,. • RESOLUTION NO. * *2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE (PARCEL MAP 6114) WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82 -195, passed on November 17, 1982, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on June 1, 1983, in the Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that a portion of the Frontage Road on the south side of Foothill Boulevard is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No.V -024 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this reso utiT— on, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1983. l( "/ EXHIBIT "A" • LEGAL FOR 30 FOOT VACATION The southerly 30 feet of the frontage road shown as Foothill Boulevard, the outer highway south, lying adjacent to the north line of lots 122 through 125 according to Tract No. 3054 as filed in Book 54, page 14 & 15 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, State of California, lying westerly of the northerly prolongation of the westerly right -of -way line of Ramona Avenue being 55.00 feet wide, as shown on said map. Excepting therefrom a triangular shaped parcel of land bounded as follows: On the north by the north line of the southerly 30.00 feet of the Foothill Boulevard outer highway south, as mentioned hereinabove; on the east by the northerly prolongation of said westerly line of Ramona Avenue as shown on said map; and on the southwest by the arc of a curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 24.00 feet, said curve being tangent to both said north line of the north 30.00 feet and said west line of Ramona Avenue. J 11 9 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician � z Z iS IF, SUBJECT: Request to Continue the Public Hearing Ordering the Work in Connection with Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Map 7349 Lewis Development Company, developer of Parcel Map 7349, has requested that this item be continued until August 3, 1983 at that time the acceptance of the subject parcel map and bonds and agreement will also be presented to Council. Respectfully submitted, G U ` � L8H K: j as j !n 40 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SU83ECT: Vacation of a portion of 7th Street located on the south side from Center Avenue east approximately 520 feet adjacent to California Finished Metals California Finished Metals, Inc. has requested the City vacate the portion of 7th Street no longer required by the Industrial Specific Plan. At the present time, 7th Street between Center and Haven Avenues is 60 feet wide with an additional 14 foot offer of dedication on the south side adjacent to California Finished Metals, Inc. This makes the present half width of 7th Street at the site 44 feet. Since the Industrial Specific Plan (Sub Area 4) reduces this right -of -way to a half width of 27 feet, 17 feet remains to be vacated. The existing curb and gutter has been constructed quite sometime ago. With the reduction in street width, these existing improvements must be removed. California Finished Metals has submited a bond and agreement to guarantee the removal of existing improvements and the construction of curb, gutter and pavement at the ultimate location. Planning Commission has reviewed this vacation at their meeting of February 23, 1983 and recommended that Staff forward it to City Council. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the summarily vacation of a portion of 7th Street and authorizing the City Clerk to record said resolution. Respectfuu lly} /ssuuuvh`-mm i P.K:jaa Attachments > C` C� / \���J) ����� I �/ � � {�� CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS. INC. . a' � 7 J 9133 CENTER AVE., CUCAMO NGA. CA.917343 (714)987.A881 �� p January 25, 1983 7 �GQ3 CtiV OF RANCHO CUCANONGA City of Rancnc Cucam:onca Ei'.GtREfRING Dlvislotl P,G. Box 607 RancF.c Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Attention: Paul P.ouceau Enclosec' are ccDies of documents requested by your office in order to proceed in our request for vacation of a portion of 7th Street. As a result of our telephone conversation, these documents are supplied instead of the information requested in November by Barbara Krall. Very truly yours, • CALIF1GFu IIA FIttISF,F.0 METALS, itIC. C�?� vA✓ G,L, Hemenover, General Manager GLH /ce Enclosurec: 1. Full P.eccnveyance 2. Ind_iidual Grant ^eed - (2) 3. Parcel nap 4, Check 0 • RESOLUTION NO. 83 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City ") did an June 15, 1983, adopt Resolution No. 63 -92 giving its prey- .^,.inary approval to an Engineer's Report (the "Engineer's Report ") prepared in connection with the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting, Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City did on June 15, 1983 adopt Resolution No. 83-94 declaring its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, a certified copy of said Resolution No. 83 -94 was duly published in the time, form and manner required by law as shown by the • Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City; and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was duly mailed to all persons owning property the proposed Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 in the time, form and manner as required by law; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held and this City Council has duly received and oonsidered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and this City Council has now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its final approval to the Engineer's Rrport. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby orders the formation of "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" and the maintenance of certain landscape improvements to be located within said Landscape Maintenance District, as more particularly described in the Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council hereby confirms the diagram of "Landscape. Maintenance District No. 3" as more particularly described in said F.ngincer'i Report and hereby confirms the assessments for fiscal year 1983-84 and the method of assessment as more particularly described in the Engineer's' Report. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and directed to file the diagram and assessment contained in the Engineer's Report, or a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 40 • • CJ • I I H O O a y m 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7 IMPFOVE;'EN7 AGRiG`lEJ17 FOR Portion of Seventh (7th) Street vacated at the request of Caltfornia Finished Metals, Inc. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRFSENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr- ed to as the City, by and between said City and California Finished MArals, Inc. hereinafter referred to as the Developer. THAT, :r'HCREAS, said Developer desires to construct curb, gutter, and asphalt pavement on the requested vacated portion of Seventh (7th) SC met in said City. WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improve- ment security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attemey, am deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NM THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's • expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 24 months from the date hereof. 2. Yh is agreement shall he effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. Unless Developer has fully performed its obligations hereunder this agreement shall be in default on the day following the second anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided, 1. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional thee. In consideration of such regeest, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and suf- ficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Devele per fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City 1'ngineer prior to start of any work wit).in the public right -of way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulatiamr. contained there. in. Ion- .:empliauq; may result in etopPing of Una work by the City, anti 1 Gment of Um penalties provided, 6, ruLJ is right -nf -way improvemenC work required shall be cons[ruchd in cnnturmance with appreved improvement plans, GCandArd apecif iCat ions, eel Guandarl Drawings and any special amendments • 0 thereto. Sonstruction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or mm,issions discovered during construction shall be cor- rected upon the direction of t City Engineer. Revised .vorX due to said plan modifications s be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by tie surety covering the original planned works. ]. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the city shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all costs and expense incurred from the Ceveloper and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 0. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, tv- locations, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal Of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The bevelopershall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Develo"Rt Director, 11. The impmverrent security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The print' -pal amount Of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: Perfomance Pond - - -- $ 34,000.00 Labor and Mlaterialmen Pond - -• $17,000.00 10 P.C.C. Curb - 8" C.F, P.L.L. Curb only 6" L.F. A.C. Berm (5200 min.) 4" P.L.C. Sidewalk 6" Drive Approach 8" P.C.C. Cross Gutter Street Excavation Imported Embankment Preparation of Subgrade Crushed Aggregate Base (per in. thick) A.L. (over 1300 tons) A.C. (900 to 1300 tons) A.C. (under 500 to 900 tons) A.C. (under 500 tons) Patch A.C. (trench) 1" thick A.G. Overlay Adjust sewer manhole to grade Adjust sewer clean out to grade Adjust water valves to grade Street Lights Street Signs Street Trees Removal of P.C.L. Curb Street Plans 2000 S. F. 1.75 3,500.00 481 C. Y. 1.50 •721,50 293 Tons 2 Ea. 1 Ea. 500 L. F. L.S. 60.00 17,580.00 • 1,000.00 2.000.OD 200.00 200.00 2.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST $31,187.50 CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA • CONTINGENCY COSTS 2.818.50 CONSTRUCTIOM ESTIMATE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ^74,001.01** ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SURETY (100.) Ce nsc rm_ curt, :uTte ^, ar.!I asp,, ^.a lc LA30R ANN :%TERIAL SECURITY (50X) '1],1100.03 pavement cr. He re cupsced vacacsd For Improvement at: .r c., �.,,,t f 7t, I - .�_ Date: ,lone. 1983 Computed by: File Ref erence: y -nay City U.S. No. NIA ::r ^.inen ring I'iv is lon of NOTE: Does not include current fee for • writing Permit or pavement deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE ITEM U40 NTITY UNIT UNIT COST S AMOUNT P.C.C. Curb - 12" C F 530 L.P. 6.00 3,180.00 P.C.C. Curb - 8" C.F, P.L.L. Curb only 6" L.F. A.C. Berm (5200 min.) 4" P.L.C. Sidewalk 6" Drive Approach 8" P.C.C. Cross Gutter Street Excavation Imported Embankment Preparation of Subgrade Crushed Aggregate Base (per in. thick) A.L. (over 1300 tons) A.C. (900 to 1300 tons) A.C. (under 500 to 900 tons) A.C. (under 500 tons) Patch A.C. (trench) 1" thick A.G. Overlay Adjust sewer manhole to grade Adjust sewer clean out to grade Adjust water valves to grade Street Lights Street Signs Street Trees Removal of P.C.L. Curb Street Plans 2000 S. F. 1.75 3,500.00 481 C. Y. 1.50 •721,50 293 Tons 2 Ea. 1 Ea. 500 L. F. L.S. 60.00 17,580.00 • 1,000.00 2.000.OD 200.00 200.00 2.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST $31,187.50 CONTINGENCY COSTS 2.818.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ^74,001.01** FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SURETY (100.) LA30R ANN :%TERIAL SECURITY (50X) '1],1100.03 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE $1,559.00 MONUMEWAT1011 SURETY (CASK) __N /A "' asc na ib •,i 1� I it'; .:£ E 'urn mom h� ::r ^.inen ring I'iv is lon of :'cr nun ihy :rC n,,, ne i.up men mt -4. Includes 26 feet of pavement nr 7th Street • FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Bond 13SN 460 05C principal Amount: $ 34,800.00 Name and address of surety: mericpn itanufaccurers y' Mutual Insurance Coclpany MATERIAL BAND LOON linois 60049 Type: Anna A 38N 460 050 Principal Amount: $ 17,000.00 American Manufacture Cs Name and address of surety: Nut ual Insurance comrany Lono Grove, Illinois 60049 CASH DEPOSIT HONUMENTATION Type: Nct applicaae Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures. Califcc��nn /Aa�, Finished Metals, Inc. Dat byes.... +..i Developer ign ature GGe eral Manager Ve'tanAw.aefeN 4 G.%. F'ecova anted is Date by Developer ign azure Accepted: I' City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation 8y: Mayor f Attest; C f ty 7 erk Approved: rJ -�' % .., S JUN ']01983 City Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST RE NOTARIZED Is -3- 9 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND feet Na Bond No. 38N 460 050 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and a ed Met c I (hereinafter designates as °principal•• ave entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements. which said agreement, dated June 1, 198 3 , and identified as pr ojec[nr..n vP n t inn t, is Rereby referred to and ma,j a er e m n n 1 a'jo d onrt n o'lTSt�''s°t. ee'i 1@ 4b SE a�R €ca {}"ot� fin E�'.e g&uC•. �i�@ a8j� €ent to C��t mla Fin�shed Metals Bu3ldin q. MHE ...AS, sal pn ncipa is regMed under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. nmerican Manufacturers HON, THEREFORE, we the principal and .f as surety, are held and firmly bound unto t e C ty o ancbo Cucamonga (hereinafter called 'City'), in the penal sum of SHIRTY FOUS THOUSAND AND N0/ 100--------------------------- - - - - -- DOI arsars Ra 00^ 00 I I awful money of the Un, ted Sates, 7oF the payment of which sum well and truly to he made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severalty, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep And perform the covenants, conditions and • provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects arrn• ding to their true intent and meaning, And shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full farce and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration Or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci- fications accompanying the same shall In anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on 198, F1 Acd '• a n Tnc. 1 erSOan piannracturers Mutual o Developed q 3 Surety �)�� H 3 r — ro,gnaturciG q�.Sw i. [orne y -In- act • G.L. IlI Mnover M° gtenheh D. Potts General Manager PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED /I?- 0 AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office Long Grove, IL 60049 u®' '„ CiiRD11P POWER OF ATTORNEY LJ Know All Men By These Presenlg Thal the American Of anufaclurers Mutual Insurance Company. a se,walom mgameed and rnbng under the laws of the State of Illinois . antl having us pnmapal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint•`...... Jot'» E. Tesnlma, Seri D. Frusta; Elsie N. Halve; all of Chicago, Illinois Cou, .. °.61661 Its true and lawful Agent(s) and allomev(sf r to make, execute, seat, and deliver during the period theism. ningwdh the dale of issuance of this a power and ending December al, 1981, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, antl as l is act and occur Any and all bonds add uuld,111 anga.a ^a °ace ^•a••ea. • EXCEPTION NO AUTHORITY is grained In make, Caecute. seal and debvel any bond or undertaking which gua .nlees the payment or collection of any promissory note, check draft or letter of credo. This authority does not permit the same obligation to be sold m10 two o more bonds in order Io bring each such bondwnhin Ibedollar limit of authority as sel'fo,k herein This appanlmenl may be revoked of any time by the American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company The aecuuon of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the said American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company as fully add empty ip all unbends aid pulpp5es. as if the same had been dub executed and aLknowdedged by ds regularly elected officers al us principal ofi ce in Long Grave. Illinois THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1934 This Power of Attorney is e xecured by authonry of a resolution dopled by the Board of Directors of said Amern Co. Manuflourer, Mutual Insurance Company on March 19. 1963 at New York. New York, a true and aCcuple copy pl which is hereinafter set forth and Is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secrelan or Assistant Seere. lary as being in full force and ettece "VOTED Tact he Vrexdr , or 5 or, I'rccntem or kite ) Awi m Seve shall have parer and aullmm, to Ooo,nt turnr ,n lard aro, m ulM1n On ahem II art hel�atl of the a .-,an, and dall the 5611 nit IM1e Lco r 'heath bonds and unuena5rna5 ar ....0. m, contract' of trndemmly and other ratings nel Raton m the ramie thereof, and to cept urrr ce of nru[055 This Power of Anome, m signed, Srated and cerfdrN by facsimile under and by authority of the follow Prig rewo inn adopted by lee Board of Directors of the company at a meeting duly called and held on the ]Ih day Of lone. 196: "VOTED. Thal the uanaWm I the weudrm an) Vice fic,Oo t Sec or M5i ant fetrelan and the Seal Of the Cmm. ham rid me r Plan arnii, Fr ,, 5eoma,..,, Minlam a a.5n, apned his pnsmdr o y parer of nlnmes red our am in rmnluhnn adnobil to 11, Hoard of Dioio ... ... March 19. 1961 antl a ouch sure, • Wed tO�N Ind Iprat.r,, wah "Oor'. e, any 6—d nr of,rlatmg In w m t u u a be ed shall ennnnur tin be ,al,d and undue In Teslimnny Whereof, the Amrncan Manufacturers MWwI Insurance Company has caused this mUrumenl to be signed and cis cnqunale seal to be affned by ds atdhmnaed officers. 1h• _llEh day OF O"'noMer — 81 STATE OF Illinois COUNTY COUNTY OF Cook I, mil ie_SE. Haim a Notary Public In and for the state and county aforesaid, do hereby certify that __ —_ Stephen O. Potts _ __ of the av_- --r vat o-nrmtoc�e re—r— —orma nv c— rn96S4N - - -- de's—eho is personally known to me, appeared before me this day and acionowledged that he signed sealed and red the foregoing rranumenl as his free and Voluntary ear as —Attorney—In—FBI -- for the �NS771; AH1AAt1lIFa., �t 'tra-'yg_1�L,TI:FrL_S:v5�_LQ._ and as Ihn free .cod yoiurVary w of the— AXEi,LChdl XA1WACT'lRn!g Kel "'llaT Ttr, " —Cly for the uses and purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and Noranal Seal this —lCat —_ day of _ —,iuDe A, D. 1983 W chin mnstoo eaprres _ddtne_29a..7.483 _, Noury Public iron ex, tai 1 � 3 rrrmrvma. LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND Bond Tlo. 35:1 460 0 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and r,, ., x -^ L"etal. (hereinafter designated as "prtncsoal" nave entered` into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public im or ovements, which said agreement, dated ,vine 1 198 1 _, and identified as project n s-� ri% hereby referred to and Made a part hereo ; an Replace them in the new location and pave or Sqq4 of th j.t f ^eel J,4�r7 �ot ",pS aL1on on Lhe south side ad,'ecent io �AMfR4Ts4�e &dBPFheLIh A "o'Yh' ,ubf`I £isfd agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho ucamongo to secure the claims co wnscn reverence is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code Of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of SEVENTrF1 TNOUFAWD AND NO /100 - - - -- D011ars (S R.000.Od, for Materials urnished 0r ab o� r phereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabnve set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as casts and to be • included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and uil persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Oivison 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect... The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations On this bond, and it does here- by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on ,Tune 1 , 198 3 QMorlcan M!nufar,turerc !^utunl California Fintnh ^d '•' tais roc. nsurrince l.emnanV Qs�I —Teve lO per n �VIr —fir et ignature ' kAttorney-in- act G.L. Nemennvnr Stephen D. Potr,n • General !lanager PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED 114 • G AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY j-1 Home Off ice'Long Gyve, IL 60049 GROUV POWER OF ATTORNEY LJ Know All Mee By these Proems: Thal the American Manufaclurels Mutual Insurance Company, a corporation organrled and existing under the laws of the $late of Illinois, and having ds plmepal office on Long Grove. Illinois, does hereby appoint ^ "• Joan S. 2,omima, SrepLen D. Pages; Flaie Al Halal; all Of CAIca9o, lllinols (EACH)'''•..... its true and lawful agoemisl and Dlmnevhlnrefacl, m make, erecule. seal, and delwa during the period begin. song wddh the dale f issuance of his cower and ending December 11, 1984, unless sooner revoked for and on it behalf as surety, and as .1, act and deed Any and all mods and vnder:ekings. ..... aaaa. aaaa • EXCEPTION, NO AUTHORITY 11 rayed In make, .,¢cure, seal and deliver any bond or undenakmg which guarantees the payent Or colleclron of any promissory note, check, draft or letter of crobl. m authority does 1 Permit the some obhgatmn In be split onto two mt more bonds in order to bong each such bond within The dinar limit of aulbonly as set' form hereon This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Manufaclurels Mutual Insurance Company The e.ecmmn of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the sold American Manufaclurels Mulual Insurance Commons as fulls' and amply IU all intents and pt,pnses, as rf the same had been evil, .secured and acknowledged by Its regularly elected officers at its principal office in LOnR G,.,e, IIIm.h THIS APPOINTMENT SMALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31. 1984 This Power of Altorney n <Rtutcd by a menly of a noolutmn adopted by the Board of Doecmr{ oI sod Amur n Manufacturers Mutual Insurance: Company on March 29. 1961 at New York, New York, it true and accurate Cops of which is herernafler so lun th b and is hereby terrified to by e undersigned Secretary or Assistant Since lary as being in full force and effect. "y'Otf[L anal Ire PrevJenl n r Noe PrnN.m sir $¢en... 4 • A......m Sevelan shall have n and aumon, 1 ,PC in a n far and or omnnre mein 1. n they'll r, me r and a eel 41 l mm�+nv red, a a ra Thor u. 1116 and unJCricess areroRn,tdnlh tvr,lla.tY 41 indl'mnrm rantl nlhr�nwnhriµ, nbligal y in Ire nature�rhereal. and in we41 service ofyr is si{ Mrs Power to Attorney ,hers signed, sealed and if hed hs pity, am meet and M1s tilled ay of the on in rip e{oy Ins con adopted by the Boar) of Urtrcblp of the sanpam al a meeting duly tilled and held on the )Ili day of Iona 1961 an, a lma•. he , of he 1'necrledo a1, Vnr my'erns Sennar. nr 1..,... I p and rye Seal of me en" pan add the c ni....mn m a v Seue , he Mcaam . ve nn s be 2', ys la-1 in 41 Inch -,, of ' turn s 11, [utM n nlnnirM Itn le tlonnr el Inner lrn. rrl Flyer $4 1941 amt a y such mmli Yu .binding m ! urine uyDiu and Vr r r", woos nrMerd hr +m nmW m uddenakn.g oo nmm n n aiucheU shall rndunm du he umtl anU binding onmetony "F In Testimony Wherms he American ManWaclulers M1luWal Inruran<e Company has caused this mnrumtml to be signed and Us Cmm ale seal In be afhyed by ds authmo,d Officers, Ihw — 101 _day of h'ep[elMC� 19 --a — Arrested led Certified: AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY By A in alma s.crmn STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK �e e I, Genevoese B HUH a Notev Pulpit do hereby (vilify' Thal G 11 Xayhh nm and R 11. Iohmors pinternally knman in 10 m 111 lie the {a n C persons uhrIN names ere rl'sln'l1,, al, o V,, P.....11enl .lie $P[ICt AIY of the AmerrCdn Manufaclurels Multi Inwranle Company. a Curnnalmn Cl Inc Slate nl Wool , soh.... bed In The fore thid, m p instrument, araree before me this day do person and snoall, I,knwledgetl That Ihn bang mention'. duly aulyonaed signed wilW with the C.Thrale seal and delivered in said imlrpmenl as the Iree and voluntary ail of said corporation and As (heir Iron free and voluel Dy If, for the me, awl porous,, Iherem eel lords 1YCpmmr „on nprts: May S, 1905 �I1 ) Gti,iry e, Wra.t. IN o i,A usil.no � 14. PxrvgvwusA • ORDINANCE NO. it AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 9.08 THERETO PROHIBITING CERTAIN NUDE CONDUCT IN ESTABLISHMENTS WHICH SERVE ALCOHOLIC BEV- ERAGES FOR ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION, AND DE- CLARING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 9.08 thereto to read as follows: Chapter 9.08 CERTAIN NUDE CONDUCT PROHIBITED Sections: • 9.08.010 Nude Conduct in Establishments Serving Alcoholic Beverages Unlawful. 9.08.020 Procuring Nude Conduct in Establishments Serving Alcoholic Beverages Unlawful. 9.08.030 Penalty for Violation. 9.08.040 Exceptions. 9.08.010 Nude Conduct in Establishments Servina Alcoholic Beverages Unlawful. It shall be unlawful for any person who acts as a waiter, waitress, or entertainer, whether or not the owner of the establishment in which the activity is performed employs or pays any compensation to such person to perform such activity, to expose his or her breast, at or below the areola thereof, genitals or buttocks in an establishment which serves alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises of such establishment. e�auonoriu ueverages un i.awcul. is snail De unlawrui ror any person to permit, procure, counsel or assist another person who acts as a waiter, waitress, or entertainer., to expose his or her breast, at or below the areola thereof, genitals or buttocks in an establish- ment which serves alcoholic beverages for consumption on the pre- mises of such establishment. 9.08.030 Penalty for Violation. Every person who violates the provisions of Sectron 9.08.010 or 9.08.020 of this Chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor. /7 G, 9.08.040 Exceptions. This Chapter shall not apply to a thea- ter, concert hall, or similar establishment which is primarily • devoted to theatrical performances. All the words used in this Chapter which are also used in California Penal Code Section 318.5 and 318.6 are used in the same sense and mean the same as the same respective words used in said Sections 318.5 and 318.6. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional, then all other provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circula- tion, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1983. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk M ORDINANCE NO. (, • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCeAMONGA REPEALING CHAPTER 6.04 OF TITLE 6 OF THE RAN - C1 10 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE PURPOSE °LT "4T;; *T!Yr, Wq:JI' inn* rnmr PROVISIONS WHICH CONFLICT WITH PREVIOUSLY ADOPTFI nonvT „Tear r. THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE ) ANIMALS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that: A, By Ordinance No. 17, effective March 29, 1978, the City Council, adopted by reference portions of that certain code known as the "Codified Ordinances of the County of San Bernardino” also known as the "San Bernardino County Code" and the portions so adopted included all of Division 2 of Title 3 (commencing with section 32.011) pertaining to animals. B. By Ordinance No. 63, effective March 7, 1979, the City Council adopted Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to dog licensing and vaccination. • C. The City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into a contract with the County of San Bernardino whereby the County of San Bernardino will provide the City with animal control services. As a condition of this contract the County has required the City to bring its Ordinances pertaining to animals into conformity with the County Ordinances on the subject. D. Ordinance No. 63 did not repeal any portion of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code but to the extent that the same coexist Chapter 6.04 of the Rancho Cucamonga Munici- pal Code will control. E. The intent of the City Council in repealing Chapter 6.04 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is to eliminate any conflict with the provisions of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code so that all County Code sections pertaining to animals will be fully enforceable within the limits of the City. SECTION 2: Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code entitled "Dog Licensing and Vaccination" is hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circula- tion, published in the Crty of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of _ 1983. AYES: • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: November 1, 1982 RE: Ice Cream Vendors. Reference is made to your memo of October 23, 1982, and the accompanying letter of October 7, 1982, from Kristine E. Miller, et al. The sanitation complaints should be referred to the County Health Officer for investigation and appropriate action • if warranted. Background investigations would be pointless unless we wish to undertake to regulate these types of businesses. If that is proposed as a policy decision, I will, of course, re- search this area of the law much more extensively. However, my initial reaction is that conducting a background check only on privately employed ice cream truck drivers might violate the equal protection clause. A total ban on curbside sales from ice cream trucks (and other "goodie" trucks which attract children might have to be included to satisfy the equal protection clause) appears leg- ally possible, but is it desirable? Again, this would be a pol- icy determination. However, such action would have the effect 42 of putti.ng some people out of business. Therefore, if such a course of action is seriously contemplated, I recommend that a '! a -1- 1 study first be conducted to determine if there is any historical • factual support for the concerns expressed in Mrs. Miller's let- ter. RED: sgg Enclosures -2- L J r 1 L.J from the desk of • LAUREN WRSSERMRN cl��T I L Cib- !!ana,,er 9 2D °aseline ¢d ^anchn Cucanrn;a Dear Sir: October 7, 1982 nur nci;hborhood has 2 ice cream trucks that frequent our nei.hbnrhond in the Alta Lora area. !inn; of us in this neihborhr.cd, feel very strongly that we would rather the :rucks nut co ^e into nur nei- hborhned rr our cite. In nor view, the trucks are a nuisance and are unnecessary. Cur rwn complaints are that the drivers have been givin!; awa; free bubble gum to bring the children clesor to the truck and there are so many children around the true!; let - tin; their Free Tun that snmrenne is bound to get run over. We have been luck,, so far and that has not happened. • There is a lar ^r turnnvrr in the drivers, the save one dres not sta- lrn;er than a few do rs. Ir an 1'11!117 did happen, it wfiul,! he nr,'t to ia,r ssibla to find then. Nnst of th= drivers have Seen men. The:- have been dressed in dirty clothes and one man was s, dirt and unshaven and smelled so had that the children riade fun of him. Snore of the children havr -otten spoiled ice crear and se.ae was hadl• melted. The driver said that his freP]el' was pint w l, kinC ver^ hell. This dres art sound like ver;• health cr.nd it it ns. One of the drivers that was rrw nn the. route in tr in; to park cL,se to the cur+, ran up nn the sidewalk luc'ail .,; on one was in the ua S,oe of these trucks have been see:; pa:k:n close to the elcaentar� sr.h -1. Deer Can-nn, The driver parks and waits for the children to pet nut of school. lur tract is L:cated on the north of anseline west or Ilave^ Ave. This is a ver•- hus street. There have been tines when the children run down the street it get ice creao from the truck. This is vort unsafe, 19 the trucks a,cm thrrurh the tract about thrrr timms. Lutel :, thn; have been cumin; in the iid -m:rr. in- whcr. the chi]dren ar- at srhr, I. There have even been times when the,- have. corm h, at ni!ht •just before dark, about 7 n'clnck. Sir, our nei;hborhnod feels that there are mov unwanted situations created by these ice r. —.; tr•.v'.s . that mould h- av, it the,' wr•.• b..'.'.n +,t rr-!, r,n_ r 1 /C?�/ This is the only solution. It is net only our children in our blrck- or tract, but allp children put in this situation that something could happen. lie frel that is wo do nrt want these trunks in our ri t7- or neiehbrrhor ds why do ue not have the ri¢ht to ^ct the„ ,ut. If we are cnl^ able to Beep then rut of our neighbrnccrd that would be a help. lie want then out •r the whole cite and are nillin? to fight Fi-r that. There is really' nothin7 to st,p these people from puttin,, „, things in the ice croon >r candy that could hurt an innocent child. These drivers of these ice tread trucks are not checked out very well. Who- should we as citizens run the risk of some awful thing happen' if we can prevent it? he ,just do not want to take the chance. We have been thinkin, about doin; this for some tine, but since the incident with the Baldwin Park girl, that was the last straw. I have a little girl of my own. Ve are willing to et a pctitinn if that is what it takes. Or take a poll to see what She cecnur.it,• as a whole feels about this situation. I do not feel we are alnae on this nor effrrts help save a child from bein-, raped, molested, or killed, then it is all worth wl.0 e. 1” have chi:dran I an sure cnu can ace our print. Lets stop this now. Than!:': r•1, Bristino E A;ller (589 -1579) Q Cs��i -s5l4� I E 0. Sox 614 Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 May 5, 1983 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, 91701 Dear Councilmembers: I would like to bring, to your attention the problems and potential problems due to the street vendors which the council allows to operate in the resident- ial sections of our city: The noise emanating from the vendor trucks selling frozen food products is so loud and so frequent that it is causing nervous exhaustion in our family and denying us the right of peaceful occupa:cy of our home, for which we paid a sue stantial price. 2. The danger to young children with whom these vendors ply their wares is evident and confirmed b;, occassional news reports of deaths and maimings. We accept the auto death rate because cars are a necessity, but there is nothing necessary about selling in the streets of resid- ential areas. 3. The city has been known to campaign or local buying, to keep sales tax revenue within the city, yet it permit; sales to be drained from local supermarkets in favor of San Bernardino, which I believe is home base for the most offensive and persistent of these street vendors. The noise level from these trucks is above the pain ana damage threshold for a person in a front yard; even inside our home, with the windows closed, normal conversation is not po s,iiile when these trucks ar•: in the vicinity, nor can the noise be stopped by hands clamped over ears. The responsibility of a city for noise which it allows has been well established by Los Angeles airport litigation. I ask that you terminate this nuisance as soon as feasible. Very truly yours, / Walter Hickel ;i'Z 4r-,- cc To i u3 0 i� 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �p GUGh1p,�' of o UJ D DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF THE DRAFT REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL RHAM METHODOLOGY BACKGROUND: In keeping with the City Council's previous decision regarding the RHAM methodology, this City Resolution would ask that Southern California Association of Governments modify the Draft RHAM to provide for a equitable distribution of the fair share housing allocation, lightening the burden on growing communities like ourselves. other cities in San Bernardino County have asked the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) to forward a resolution to SCAG voicing its concerns regarding the disproportion allocation of low- moderate income housing needs in the SANBAG region. If passed by the City Council, this Resolution will be forwarded to SANBAG and to SCAG for their consideration. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the accompanying Resolution requesting modification of Regional Housing Allocation Model, and forward said Resolution to SANBAG and SCAG. I Respectfully stSitted, tA i City Fanner RG /kep Attachment: Resolution I% RESOLUTION NO. * g3 —I t '�) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO THE REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL AND ITS RESULTS WHEREAS, San Bernardino County and many of its included cities already have proportions of low and very low income housing units above the regional average as compared to the more urbanized counties such as Orange and Los Angeles; and WHEREAS, these entities are being required by the Regional Housing Allocation Model to provide even more low and very low income housing units; and WHEREAS, the number of housing units allocated to the 1980 -85 period by SCAG 182 are not reflective of actual short -term growth trends; and WHEREAS, the current Regional Housing Allocation Model process is causing many low income /high growth areas to absorb affordable housing units far in excess of a fair share while most high income /slow growth areas absorb less than a fair share of affordable housing units; and • WHEREAS, the continued directing of affordable housing to the outlying growth areas (which tend to have an overabundance of affordable housing) will exacerbate the problem of regional housing /jobs balance; and WHEREAS, the imbalance of jobs and housing is causal to increased work trip lengths, decreased air quality, and detrimental to the development of self- sustaining growth centers. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, San Bernardino Associated Governments does resolve as 1. That the Southern California Association of Governments and its appropriate policy committees review and modify the current Regional Housing Allocation Model so that affordable housing allocations reflect the same equitable fair share contribution throughout the region. 2. That the Southern California Association of Governments allow those jurisdictions with allocations of affordable housing in excess of the regional norm to apply those units to the moderate and upper income categories; if so desired. 3. That local SCAG '82 growth estimates for the period between 1980 and 2000 need to be adjusted to reflect short -term growth trends while maintaining overall subregional population and housing totals for the year 2000, �� S Resolution No. Page 2 4. That the Mayor forward these recommendations to San • Bernardino Associated Governments' member jurisdictions and to the Southern California Association of Governments for consideration, action, and implementation. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor DSO • • • \J 11111 l 1 n A 1IITT/ IT" n w1/ 1 I I A STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner i OI� Q i 1977 SUBJECT: "' '1RIAN TRAIL GUIDELINES - Amending Resolution 81 -93 establishing trai�esign standards. SUMMARY: In conjunction with adoption of the Trails Element of the Gene rai Plan in 1981, the Commission and Council adopted resolutions . setting forth trail design standards. Through their review of projects within the equestrian rural area, the Equestrian Advisory Committee has found a need to refine these trail standards. Staff has worked with the Committee in preparing the attached standard drawings for the Council's review and consideration. An analysis of the proposed revisions is contained in the attached Planning Commission staff report of June 8, 1983. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend Resolution 81 -93 to adopt the attached Equestrian Trail Guidelines. Respect ull.r� submitted, Ix Ali {-. ir Rfck ,6omez City'Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Equestrian Trail Guidelines Planning Commission Staff Report - June 8, 1983 Resolution 81 -93 Resolution 81 -93A /% city of rancho Cucamonga STANDARD 151 as�rrdcxr * DRAWING SrUr MAIL FENCE .$'TV. D9414. 5411 2:1 CuT 3tOPB FINISH `uSURF�\ AGE GLtf'fEP� TD LESSEN t;KO5to1'I � -c GAL S5-GTION STV. t7RWCG. 813 m ,T'• PAIL ENDS LEFT UNNNLEO Fo UFT -04T I 'jET mr- LOT CIlT'� -R 'TpAIL j5i4 �4 GORnEF U!Y WF VEHICLE A[tESs 10' T PI CAL PLAN *101 MAY ee A'EPTADLF- A-r Tw�T h�UNDAQl65 �bJA%CFy't- TO UNCEYELUPEV (z�- :JIL'c�i"^�AL Lp.r{p. No-re, �oP- C{�.4DIN4117WwW^�aE, gul�wxk. Alyp OTN6R- bt'Eic1Fi[ATIONS, SSE THE oTH� h1VE oP THIS SI1Ete'�, LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL 1001 .1ty 441•661 60.•. 23809 d•1• /5? d ' 0 DESIGN REO'JIREMENTS 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5% optimum 101 maximum for distances over 500' 15 1 maximum for distances limited to 500' 20% permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 24% optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only 3. Drainage: Where trail gradient exceeds 4 %, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 4. Side Slone Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 10 feet • 6. Overhead Clearance: 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: Where Cortmunity Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. 8. Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. 9. Street and Driveway. Crossings shall be at grade with appropriate Crossings: street striping and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses from slipping. • ��9 0 vita of rancho cucamonga STANDARD nmAWING UIL wwL PLH4TEK ARFA TW^ILI ANA — Pp.RKWAY VARIES. 4EE PL�1d VIEW, ' 7HwoW po% PLANTING At'" 5��GI 4ATE RPjzIIR[o AT FO L T >TP, PRW E4% I--,' _. -plc us PI.AMIL , I V) TT—Fu D W C1 � TE F9i� PI.�.: -I Ylrl�l BLOLyc WALL- TI'AI L FAP *WAY 4", LUW6 Noyes: I EI-rl sHAVOw Box stw.LL 1 L1 PLAMTeD WITH 2 DlbUOMT 'TaLEP ANT FI%�L BB PLf`HTEIJ PLAHTED ♦•FFAS _ WITH APLTJTIICTA Cj.LBHGULA (GAFF_ IH PM- ✓w�.Yl TPAIL- t -%+D -1 I _T O. T,1E BL/�LK WALL SHALL BE PLi -„+TEV WITH WIDT L LRCCr WG FIb (FILUS PUMILA) zo'O•G. 20 10' 2 %�, '7 '' I03' 9• STRCGT TPEES SHR -I- r r ZO' E.O. L 5. I'K� T� %IL PLANTS ARE PGF'MITT EDP (Jz -RAGING I G4 Nr�C �• SJRF/ AND JTHEi'- P�= 1FIG? ?IDI IS ��t "_-1 -tE CTIa�J�- �PIL''r_ Uio YFIIS 6NF�"(, I COMMUNITY TRAIL: PARKWAY 20' 1 1002 air engineer ce.e, 29999 dole 19 O __ —I 0 DESIGN REEUIREMENTS 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5 °' optimum 10" maximum for distances over 500' M maximum for distances limited to 500' 20' permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 2-4% optimum 61 maximum in approved locations only 3. Drainaae: Where trail gradient exceeds 4 %, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 6. • Overhead Clearance: 10 feet 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. 8. Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. 9. Street Crossings: Crossings shall be at grade with appropriate street stripling and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses from slipping. • IV city of rancho cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING N��g : Ie)CT comr, wocc 'fT4�IL 6tU R9 roR GPA•DIrl",1 OW4it1A.�E, SURFACE, AHD vT!-IaF 9p �I F1 CATIONS/ g 0-r},FR 'IGE OP THIS SHEET• I COMMUNITY TRAIL: PARKWAY 12' I 1003' e11Y Ynpinw f.0.. 231189 dot* 0 DESIGN REQUPUENTS 1. Vertical Grade: - 0 -5i6 optimum 10, maximum for distances over 500' 151'6 maximum for distances limited to 500' 20" permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 2 -4v optimum 6" in approved locations only 3. Drainaee: Where trail gradient exceeds 4%, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Orainage Standard 813. 4. Side Slone Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 6. Overhead Clearance: 7. Flood and Drainaee Channel Crossings: B. Trail Entrance: 9. Street Crossings 10 feet • Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing Such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. Crossings shall be at grade with appropriate street striping and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses from slipping, • city of rancho cucamonga 7171 MbLIG DrDI[PTIDH EXTFauDEd 60w-. KI7..nmvjr4 . STANDARD DRAWING Ti2EES PLAHTED 601 O•G, L FlHKH 'bUK,, --E ITT LINES r(pl L See- NorE: HOMEOWNEjz oR OEVF.LOPfiR C.^N INSTAL.. ALTERNATE FENLE OR �I`LorUNES WALL TO DrHHEI TR+VL EAsEMEN7• 5�- 6, vyATr- RFgUIRBD Ax eac" Lc fr 4TD. DRWE* 10C.1 717) Pi=o N LorLINO�ii N o-m = Y-oR C�NJ,DIH41 1�R°+NxiE� SURF.•t -E pND o-�t -16R- 51°EUFIt,�.T1oNS� sr-c- THE ort+E4�- sroE or n+1s sHeET <1I, .•9I <.., <.•.17889 ,.,•ICOMMUNITY TRAIL: INTERIOR 04 10 DESIGN REOOIREFiENTS 1. Vertical Grade: 2. Cross Section: 3. Drainage: 4. Side Slone Cuts and Fill S. Surfacing: 6. Overhead Clearance: 7. Flood and Orainaae Channel Crossings 8. Trail Entrance: 9. Street Crossi_ n aas 0 0-51, optimum 10': maximum for distances over 500' 15" maximum for distances limited to 500' 20" permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2-4% optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only Where trail gradient exceeds 4 %, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 2:1 maximum Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 10 feet Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. Crossings shall be at grade with appropriate street striping and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses from slipping. 0 city of rancho Cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING 3o' EA6r -MWT SAY tE Imo- v l mill �'m GHaNUrtK tNce INSTALI�D p>`( D�vEI -op�.K oN ptropt;RrY Ur}E HN15H ' Rr;.V- CoNTWoI- CRAHHEL NOTr:: roR 4RTD1NCa / DIZPIMP4� '�UfzFAGINCq pHD GLITp hiGE 5MZ4r GAMON5 , 5M "rHr- orHr--tz ODE or- -rHly SHMt�T. xaeeo REGIONAL TRAIL 1 1005 I �1 0 DESIGI1 REOUIREME11TS 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -57, optimum 10' maximum for distances over 500' 15 maximum for distances limited to 500' 20" only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 2-4% optimum 6" maximum in approved locations only 3. Drainace: Where trail oradient exceeds 4 %, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 4. Side Slooe Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 6. Overhead • Clearance: 10 feet 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossinas: Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. 8. Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. 9. Street Crossings: Crossings shall he at grade with appropriate street striping and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses from slipping. • l q l city of rancho Cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING GATa- VI ITN ( E %T ADDED (LliLpETE hTeY TH FOMGH - EfC,E fSEC DETAIL) ;1, r <--TRN I-IDI MIn - (win , N+A '\la' Nx O° GuR6 CID �STFEET TPf�S 2oI 2' MIN. PLtiN VIEW --r MCT ,'-I- PLATE- ry pLl -W4y WC L C•I.;V Jv ly LIM14H'r P'Irl.. - PIPE 'ro SLIPE ,.J. L uriveR I I I STEP THF� H tl 5h 4511 Jut e.aTr- COHsTFUCTt'I> of 2'Iz '�TMPAhf, 1 ME.MPPeI"S. MINA FeAl -ED ey WEDIHG GW>:5 MEMPr" To A 3° STArIDApD ,M"' FIVE - ,LCFVE w1 C^f, '. twrPFU oVE)Z 2112, " uPh'I: +HT. DETAIL: GATE WITm STEP THh)Lv," (COMMUNITY TRAIL:',, I 1006 tlly engineer VEHICLE GATE WITH SIDE ACCESS Ij Ge A. R]BB9 tleb - -_ city of rancho cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING — F_"�m E.HP Po`+TS IE °uUr a.�� CWJ'IFER- TELEPHONE P0.E5 _y IB" \ FINISH GF^PF- STEP - THROUGH DETAIL 1007 r.c.., 23089 ea. ,y city of rancho Cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING NOTES: UATC 'CLn61H4 L<TGH t k1AL -l. (! R&CP_ I. THe GJ.TE OIRNA- rr A SOLID 11W0 SFl- F-GLO -JWy rA^TE 'TDIIL/ WMf rP PAY TIIP- rL lrylrla DIVISION. Z.MATERIALh -!HALL 9r WFfjTEKN RED GP—P^r. OP PftrViL*6 TRr/.TED VO4GO•f\S FIR. 3,ALL HAI:OWAFE SHALL Va HUT DIPPHp GALVAfyIZEO METAL• (GATE: COMMUNITY PARKWAY TRAILS city 11,91(1 11,94(164? 6c... 23889 4,110 1- n A �s? city of rancho cucamonga 2G' TPAIL i 11 rc 11z ?E, _�,cscvw k� A ^f gl pay I fGP Cvvl - Z.°rilLU'+'D ne5 �Pe�e GrZI STANDARD DRAWING rim r�E'jAI!r T .41 'its 9TEEI- r1rr, TRW L F tML CR -, Q, �_T "Ism r�Flkvr_ � FO aD TEES Q9W AS Ms F, FcsTs 10N A- AI. BARRIER WITH STEP -OVER 1009 city "nuingr r.c,e. 23852 do%* /\ i� raLro V TIr roST� /Cs n, -� t�v I� NWw a� -- �++FF --S -�P ^v�? 8" cnurrtc�- •slHarw ,�.. •._— �.�iy- -_ -1rI - �,•_Y...: TIGS LO�f (�.rpCD ifWW'YD TiL�IMi'J ..rA:.ti:1L+ it f Rry ir•'�E' —PIF d Q N ''P Nr_K MA,Y Zr 4-�,—F-C WITH A eT—r ?—rHj!aubH rtzw� 10 ^^ BARRIER WITH STEP -OVER 1009 city "nuingr r.c,e. 23852 do%* /\ 6° STANDARD city of rancho cucamonga DRAWING .9 N III Lt�MF�(TYt') I`IDTFS= I � I. �d--L M�pEKS 51'W>..!_0E PFzf.A°5T CoNGr�T� IIKEM -l1GKY IT.�LI� FENGt= � loll AvPJta.9t -� PKOM FzIALTO f�KGYiE Fr-NLr- OR ^rrrovED ALZIV --PT -rr-- I I 2. MF�EI45 sHAL1- f3E NI-F,f�ZI.Y CoN�'f6 OF Equi \)ALENT (WNI?B COL-0g). 3. CPWI AEl IN LIMA DIt2ECTION SHAIJ- IpegUlrzr TYJD PATS 511ar-- ely S'I PE- l 4. 51 I �MD PoSTS AA L fV,vE Of'�l t SI oT5 I I FIU.EO W /MoxrAM ANo TFacTLAlzE FINISH 1012 To rAIMTINei. #<I- tzE5&1` 5cC T ION r-IHISH 6WE I EXTRUDED CONCRETE FENCE: COMMUNITY TRAIL ellY •nBln.n ee,o. 23889 deb 1 city of rancho cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING ��� f i LiGL�. TO Ar:: �MMUFiPTE ' hAILE:-p IN WITH �XG t'71UN OF ION LIFT-JuT 12P`IL FED :c T, i� 'i b lz �i s ADr- V. �-.."lit"�,� ✓ ti., i N I � �� I °� GONGFzETE G�LIAR q AHC FzAILL- SN•'� -L E; Wc:�T =��-ty �F[� G�GAI:.. i�1JtIF_OIJh!Lti Of- PF`�� >l- =%Pi�� ii'N IN�j, \I_L , -�H ALT F_L N,ATE 1= '•`.N =c TD Li'r-ihF= T1�AIL E.''�E.Ii;2i'�1 "• (znlL! I Pcpy� r 5126 �Qk1�7C Z' {z' 6f I SPLIT RAIL FENCE: LOCAL TRAIL 1011 cllY en9lnen r.a�. 4889 deb � I SPLIT RAIL FENCE: LOCAL TRAIL 1011 cllY en9lnen r.a�. 4889 deb � 0 I J �9IC f - ^ SECT /OiV A -A PARKWAY RUNOFF DEFLECTOR Ero of P.�r4wo� Oer /ecro.- to be b..ffao ago,.�sr be <.r of cu v �Typi�o /% A Ate. 45' C .J EGurfe� PARKWAY RUNOFF OEFLECTOR a SECT /ON A -A CO.VC. STREET OVERFLOW ,DEFLECTOR Grcuon of .'.� Caner. Orerr`:iw Prom along back o {sidewa /k err eaye °{ Riynf Of :YoY. 20'- I r4s- Ccnsf P°rkwoY Runoff Oe {/e c,-o� TYP /CAL PLACEMENT OF OPEf?FLOW DEFLECTOR AT STREET /NTc'RSECT /ON WITH SIDEWALKS /T/ fl Pare Oreo between Cwb I Orerf /ow Oef /eclat Gur!er � � and curb w %fh 4 "FCC. dei/erlo/ onion. /I Canel. Over Flaw, Per Section A -w TYPICAL PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE STREET OVERFLOW DEFLECTOR AT DRIVEWAY APPROACH comc.?crc --1 I I ST DEFLEOCTORLOW TKO/CAC PLACEMENT OF OVERFLOW DEFLECTOR Ar STREETINTERSECrION wren ee/w.en ed�- of ___ WIrNOUT SIDEWALKS On�ew °y �Pr°ach and �-� o very /ow °rore�ror le be �� O{frcf Orerf/aw Oef /odor 2' from Po.;ea w,rn '/`p((•/ der /error a,°ron. y/ eoge of oporoocn of Prgoerf /me _ Y II' = 4w Mfg End cr Jrer { /ow Deflector ' •� A /r' ra ba n °ffm °ua,asl TYPICAL PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE STREET OVERFLOW DEFLECTOR AT DRIVEWAY APPROACH comc.?crc --1 I I ST DEFLEOCTORLOW 0 nrmv �v r n a.ntrn n7 Tn n nfn�Tr n STAFF REPORT �� 4.� a I� 1977 DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EQUESTRIAN TRAIL GUIDELINES - Amending Resolution 81 -53 establishing trail design standards SUMMARY: In conjunction with adoption of the Trails Element of the General Plan in 1981, the Commission and Council adopted resolutions setting forth design standards for regional, community and local feeder trails. Through their review of projects within the equestrian rural area, the Equestrian Advisory Committee has found a need to refine these trail standards. Staff has worked with the Committee in preparing the attached standard drawings for the Commission's review and consideration. ANALYSIS: The basic provisions of the adopted trail standards remain Unchanged such as trail width, grading, drainage and surfacing requirements. The following is a summary of important changes: o More precise streetscape design standards for community trails, including fencing, landscaping, and perimeter block wall design. o Design standards for trail entrances, such as gates, vehicle barriers, and step- throughs or step - overs. o Trail fencing specifications for extruded concrete fences (community trails) and wood split rail fences (local feeder trails). o Standards for parkway "water bar" runoff deflectors for north -south trails subject to erosion. ITEM J Equestrian Trail Guidelines Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 2 • RECONMENOAT ION: The Equestrian Advisory Committee recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution 81 -53 A establishing trail design standards. ly syymitted, )C:Jr achments: Equestrian Trail Guidelines Resolution 81 -53 Resolution 81 -53A • ,�0/l C6 C � RESOLUTION NO. 81 -53 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO ?'MISSION ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI - PURPOSE, COMMUNITY AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS 'WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for the design of trails within the City, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommended the Trails Element for approval by the City Council, and; WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to have trails provided along natural physical features where possible. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish the following DESIGN STANDARDS FOR TRAILS: . SECTION 1: Trail Width: (in feet) Regional Multi- purpose Trails 30' As Community Trails 20' Local Feeder Trails 15' On Street /Off Street Bike Trails 5' (See Exhibit A) Clearance: 10' overhead with brush and weeds, debris and rocks removed from trail tread. In instances where topography, right -of -way configuration grading or existing vegetation make it infeasible to construct full width trails as listed above, the City Planner may grant relief and reduce said requirements. c_, l Resolution No. 81 -53 Page 2 SECTION 2: Design Requirements: a. For equestrian usage the following requirements shall be • met: 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5'; optimum lo'; maximum for distances over 500' 15'; maximum for distances limited to 500' 20 7'; . permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 1 -4`; optimum 6`S maximum in approved locations only 3. Drainage: Avoid erosion by proper grading. Where necessary, use diversionary devices such as water bars and berms. 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Native soil, decomposed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Removal of rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. • b. For bicycle usage the following requirements shall be met: 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5, optimum 10`„ maximum for distances limited to 200' 2, Cross Section: 2, maximum 3. Surfacing: 3" asphaltic concrete or 4" portland concrete cement 4. Desion Sneed: 11 MPH average, 7 -15 MPH 5. Curvature: 15 MPH maximum SECTION 3: Fencing a. For Regional Multi- Purpose Trails: Along Flood Channels fencing shall cns oist of T-6 chainlink fence installed by the Flood Control District, Corps of Engineers or the city of Rancho Cucamonga atop th flood control channel wall. The adjacent developer shall be re- sponsible for the installation of a 6' high chainlink fence installe at the ,joint property line for the length of the co- terminus bo dar Openings shall be made for access at approved points and for w local Feeder Trails and Community Trails intersect. c�nI 0 Is Resolution No. Page 3 b. For Community Trails: Fencing along street trails (i.e. parkways shall consist of 4' -5' high two -rail white extruded concrete fence installed along the ultimate right -of -way line for the street, where there are no existing block walls; otherwise fencing shall he located at curb line. Openings shall be provided where Local Feeder Trails or Regional Multi- Purpose Trails intersect. For trails not along streets, no fencing shall be required. C. Local Feeder Trails: Fencing shall consist of one rail, IF high, wood split rail fencing, installed along the co- terminus boundary of the easement and the non - easement property of the tract or lot. SECTION 4: Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed to provide for equestrian, bicycling and hiking use and discourage motor vehicle access (See Exhibit B), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unobstructed vehicular access for service vehicles. SECTION 5: Bicycling Trail requirements shall be as shown below: Pancd Cer EI of I I nq ='e O: e•arn9 I I Motor Val Ce Ooerat ^� 10 o' ::' g �I °I �I I TYPE I SHARED BIKEWAY I I of Bvvc'e j Molar cel`c R I TYPE It SHARED BIXE'WAY 0 ^.(!r d! C'E!d it UI t0'or It TYPE III P.ESTRICTED 01KIWAY �I le I p� �I PcTrr Ic MDIa•vel c'e fil rT.. ...I _ I ORE,. ':� I _, Crr•ap "D � I � 9mvt' EI � I`• m'm II nl r^ Resolution No. Page 4 Ca. Shared Bikeways: The shared bikeway has no barrier, • either symbolic or physical, to delineate the roadway for bicycles. The bikeway is identified by signs posted along the side of the roadway or by pavement markings painted on the roadway. The outside traffic lane becomes the width 'required for motor vehicle travel, usually 10 or 11 feet, plus the 5 -foot bikeway. Bicycle -flaw is always the same direction as motor - vehicle -flow, since this is much safer. Shared bikeways can be developed in conjunction with pedestrian traffic. However, this practice is discouraged, since pedestrian -flow and bicycle - flow are not very compatible. b. Restricted Bikeway: It is clearly delineated by a barrier and signing. Adequate delineation is an essential re- quirement for the development of a restricted bikeway. Barriers are symbols, such as those made with paint on a pavement. Symbol barriers include striping, full -width coloring and reflectorized raised pavement markers. C. Minimum Criteria For Shared & Restricted Bikeways: The following criteria shall be considered: 1. Average daily traffic (motor vehicle) • 2. Bicycle volume 3. Posted speed limit 4. Truck Traffic 5. Adequate right -cf -way 6. Safety SECTIOI 6: Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridoes, ramp ways, culverts, etc. SECTION 7: Si nina: Signing is required to let the user and the public know where the trails are. a. Equestrian: ?11' 7)( Resolution No. Page 5 0 b. Hiking: ss. i; C. Pedestrian: • e Bike: mr� .i a,z 7 r Resolution tlo. /� ; Page 6 t i( e. Informational: NO BEGIN '` MOTOR RIGHT TURN LANE � - VEHICLES YIELU�IRES V'J OMD USE YIELD PED TO SIGNAL PEDS o© &F�[GEk 1-71 ' LEFT RIGHT ..:.AHEAD QTLY BIKE BII(E LANE LANE aiN- a13 • 0 0 • *) I-- E, -f CO14IMUNITY Tlz4 1Z- 17- A S J I/ .1 ) I Ll �,.. lY'I I MULT /- PUR1b.SE 7I?i /L I LOCAL FEEDER 7R4 /Z l C�. FAIL F?NLIfNs TRAIL RAIL f�G,1.1» C: MAMQINq� MLFZAO T lil CiiLVINtL�DIG` Qf oM1z.�2 Et�m ��FiKE. recd WALL 11 \77 ,��\V�� \C�� \Y • CILL'.'F WAW � tCG.E�wa W e.o .F ml M4 +TC�•evfR s a �� Fc.tuuvi VECHICLE BARRIERS DESIGN ALTERNATIVES E,W /BlT 5 0 • • • E il C 04785 'N(1F ,wG Aczr95 I CNAI N LI/JIL !+ fBJLT OR LOGC ,_II J/ �dajE�J xx KxXX vrvxx W METLI W. •y. 14-wI wT a%eTe� N6R1. 6NM1 IS Nlu4EO 111UIN(� WPM 64TS "/ ` ( SXI�10177G I Resolution No. 81 -553 SECTION 8: Street Crossings: street stripping and signing. texturized paving is desirable. t' Shall be at grade with appropriate In cases of equestrian usage, SECTION 9: Waivers: The Planning Commission may grant a waiver from the requirements of this Resolution except Section 1 when: (a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Resolution. (b) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to other properties. (c) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. (d) The granting of the waiver will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations an other properties classified in the same zone. (e) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Any request for waiver shall be presented in writing and be made as part of the development application for the project which involves the trail. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1981, PLA�JITNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )Z�rd Dahl, Chairman 7 'r 1 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission ),1-7 • • 0 E Resolution No. 81 -53 Page 8 f I, JACK IAN, Secretary of the Planning Cotmnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMIS-IONERS: Rempel, King, Tolstoy, Dahl NCES: COMMISSIONERS: More ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka a,k • RESOLUTION NO. 81 -53A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING RESOLUTION 81 -53, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI - PURPOSE, COMMUNITY, AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS 'WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for the design of trails within the City; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Trails Element as a part of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the standards called the "Equestrian Trail Guidelines ", and has found that these standards are the minimum necessary to implement the intent and purpose of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby: . 1. Amends Resolution 81 -53 by adopting the standards, called the Equestrian Trail Guidelines for regional multi - purpose, community, and local feeder trails; and • 2. That the Equestrian Trail Guidelines, shall supersede those standards for equestrian trails previously adopted as part of Resolution 81 -53; and 3. Recommends to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that Council Resolution No. 81 -93 be amended to adopt the Equestrian Trail Guidelines. 4. The Equestrian Trail Guidelines shall be included in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Drawings booklet, starting with the number 1001. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OE- THE -,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I BY: ,1 /( t r'il Herman RerIlpeell/, J /�ha ATTEST: _11 1.1.1,x-, Lary of the Planning LOM;n Iss ion 17J L I RESOLV; :1C :; ::n. 81 -91 A PE50 LC ;:C:: OF -:R CS :R C^.C::C[L O.' n1E Cc -! Or aV;C iU CL'CS:U::Cd. [BT. \:L iE;R: :G STANDARDS FOR THE DES1G: OF RaC1ONAL %lll.a -PC RPOEE, CMM:: :I� ANO LOCAL FC[CEB TRAILS 1417H1N TILE CI :Y of RAACHO CCCIP!O:IGA. WHEREAS, it is the Cit'i's desire to establish standnrds .`o. the design of crawls wichi. the Cicy: and NRERE•1S, the Plamniag Commission has reviewed and adopted a similar Resolution establishing standards far [he design of Regional Mu1t1- Purpose, Co :mum ,': and Local Feeder Trails within he City of Rancho C ... mnga: and 611EP.EAS, it 1s the City Council's desire to establish these same andards by CS[y Council Resolution for the development of trails within the Cir of Rancho Cucamonga, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Ewes -onga does hereby establish the following design standards as attached Exhibit "A" for wails. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981. AYES: Frese, Mtkels, Palumbo, Bridge, Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: Nan. Phil 4p D. Schlosser, Mayor AIIES:: a Tun Y. liar »erran, li q: Clerk L << E \1i :51T "A" UESICN STAR0AV05 FOR T?. \i ES SEC:: ^,;: l: irn it t<Id the (in Ever) Trolonal Nnit 1 -Pu rpom Traits CO' Community Trails 20' Local Feeder Trails 15' On streetNff Street Bike Trails 5' (Sae Exhibit A) Clearance: 10' overhead with brush and vesd.n, debris and rocks removed fro. trail tread. In instances where topography, right -of -way configuration grading or isting vegetation cake it infeasible c ct full width trails as listed above, the City Planner nay grant relief and reduce said requirements. • 1 MU_'T /- PVRPOS -Z 77P,4// • L G.. r A P.ELn 4': :0!: OF 7.1'. CL -: COC:C.. 0C TIIC C:" Of ' TFE lc POSCWM!tl � E -o ocsLG!: CF PGI0';AL :C :0 TFC OF a _a'•i L5 +t' E 'HiN LOCAL E�6 CLLC:J10GA. anaards fcr l: sh s WE, %S is is the City's destce eo estob the Ansi6n of [ru lz aithio the Civy: and has xe i vd and adopted a VHEBFdO, the P:annin6 [om=ission for :heVdesi6n of he City similar 0.eso lu lvon establizhan6 scaad Ards Feed" ,dthia the City of Nulti- Potpose, Cormwity and to cal Baacho Cucaaon6a{ an -' bft ,TNSIEAS, it is the Cit9 Council's desire devcl opmeme aai' -z for th a andard5 by City Cocne it Resolution ,,""oo the City of 0.a" a Cucamon6a, Bancha Cacano . ;a that xhe City of NO, TTLE?.EF'CB_ BE IS 0.EBGII: EC, t„dards as attached Ex.... -• does hereby establish the fol:cvfn6 aesi6a z "A" for trails. 1901. MOFTEp ch is 17 t day of .tune. ...SF.O, APPBO':i0, and P,o,, NSkels, Pn LOmbo, Brid6e. SCF.loszer AYES: • NOES: Noa. ABB::Ii: None - te- Phvle,tp J. Gco to zs e AT :ESTa �yJ roan, City Cluk L G.. - r • Resolution Page Reso l No- 91 -91 r CG 4MUNl7Y 1AA 1L L oCtiL FEEDER T4 /Z SEC-TON 2: Design 4e1-irenenrs: a. For equestrian usage the follwing requirements shall be net: 1. Vee[iral Grade: 0 -57, op tfmum - 10. maximum for distances over 500' 157. maximum for distances 11x1 cod to 5CO3 20.: permitted only in extreme cases oral for short distances under 100' 2. Crnas Section: 1 -42 opcinun 6Z maximum in approved locations only 1. 0rataa ce: Avsid a as ion by proper grading. there once ry, u e diversionary devices such as vaerr bars and berms. 6. 64d.+ Slanm Cuts end Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Snrfllilcl Native soil, decommosed goinice or thepped tree rtirai n {s. RE, oval of rocks and debris and grad, surf aze smooth. i b. Fur hiryrin a [Im fol1c,.q re ipii:aments shall be nee. l 1. Vmri ^.n rrnd.•; 0 -53 ootl::um -- 10'. max room for dist.rncos llnitcd eo '00' 2. C,, ;, 5 2: maximum 1. -rinn: 91rn V vnh_4ti, c o ncretr or :' potet,rad c nnc rote cement. 4. C., •n "11-1: 11 4F11 av, .,qe, 7-15 tiPll S. cnrva oir 15 )BII maxlaum n ,^ CC << F,., �- VEI-1�11�cl-� E3�12.lq!-ERS DE�S;L'N ALTE—M�iATIVEQ 12- , ) • 14 1 �71 VEI-1�11�cl-� E3�12.lq!-ERS DE�S;L'N ALTE—M�iATIVEQ 12- , ) • • Is ar.owcion :m. et -9) (,4T25 Wrw 51 ,A Shy %}xx %rYxv %v %V �I �.iu u.ra II Ic'Man�rYa� CC Resaiu[ion Ja. SI-iJ • Pa' ;c 5 SF.C779Y 1: IF ing: a. For Mnt—.al Yule- parpase Traii:: Alone 'Flan'.; C'vanncls ecnciou, shalt consist of a a' tallnk n:.[a��ed by e Flood Control Olateict, Coro, of EnGivuernl.aor the City th of Rancho Cuconool- all ahe Eland c rol channel _ vnll. The adjecont d ,eloper zh.41 6 ..consible f the installation of a 6' high chainlink fence installed er a joint properi': IL -.e far the Iengt -' of the co-germinus boundary. Open:nue shall be mach foe access at aro",b po mts and far vhere local Feeder Trails and Conemerity Traits inmrsect. b. For C. --nit, Trails: Fencing alone srmet trails (i.e. parhvovc) shall. oast of +' -5' high r +o -rail ohitc c dcd c c fancc insrattad 110-3 the ultiaate right -of -way line for the cs cet, vherc -there a o existing block watts; ocbeva lse, fencing shall be located a curb line. nOneningi shall be provided where Lac.al Feeder Trailc or Reg lanai multi- ?,:pose Trails i.._er- sect. For trails not along streets, no fencing shall be required. C. Local Feeder Trails: Fencing shall consist of o be tell. 6• high, -end aalic rail forcing, installed along the c - s boundary of the ease-cc: and the non - casements property of the tract or plot. SEC-ION a Trail Ent-accat Trail entrances shall be designed to provide `. equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicle n s (See Exhibit B), a cepi Local Feeder hat" shall provide one means of unobsttucted vehicular access for service vehicles. SECTI ^!. 5: Bicaclina Trail re,uire-enca ehll be as shown below: ot— eer vma eror m' � s' � war ::' I rnr r sx.xm mall—. I's .r 1-11a oa evv L a 1 1 ra n £I 1 1 t eirrea Car OC. ra:n0 M e Ottrp ,.I � a'a la' el S' I- it c, I �I I„ 1 • • Re so lotion go. 91 -95 Fa ;e I a Shared S4.cvovs: The shared bikaa+av has s no barrinr, either symbolic or physical. to delineate the ro.+dvav forbicac.les. T + e b(kevav is identi -,d v by signs ousted along the side ro the ad' -av or by a at me nark logs p m zed on the read._, no a taldet ra,'ic lane becomes t!.c width resulted for car vehlcle travel, u s -ally 10 ar 11 feet, '"s the 5 -foot bikeway. BicycLe- s flcw i mn iis the sold direction as not -veh LC le -flow since this is much sofer. Shared bikesovs e n be d vcl used i, onlnnction vetch pedestrian traffic. Flcwever, this statute as dism..rayed, since pede -s rrlan -flrra and bicycle -flew are not very cocpatible. b. Restricted 9ikevav: It is clearly delineated by a barrier and signing. Adequate delineation is a zential requf :event r the deveiopmenc of a estriced bikeway. Barriers are syrbels, such as chose rude with paint on a pavement. Symbol barriers include striping, full -width coloring and re..euerized raised p.l.rent asorkerz. c. minima Criteria For sMated and Resrr'ctatl 31'a evevs; The following criteria shall be considered: 1. Average daily traffic (motor vehlcle) 3. Bicycle volere li 1. Posted speed 11tait 6. Truck Traffic • 5. Adequate rifho-of -way 6. Safety SECT209 5: Flrrd —_'md nrai_aec Channel 6r111ir— GTere Ce- eni :y i ails cross ex is clog or Porposeo drainage c a , 1he c ncinui ty of the [rail shall be maintained by the construction of a. appropriate crossing such as bridges, rasp .. ways, culverts, etc.n sECT10:1 ]: SS zn: SiSaing is required is let the user and the public know where the trails are. a. F.a .11 11 l� Ei4\) O Y USE SIGIIAL LA IIE AHEAD encE 1E �IIE No MOTH VEHICLES YIELD 0 P D S E! LANE 11 I E� la I Hai INN LANE YIEL18iUl M �m 0 7o se lu tion ):a. 91 -91 �4 7m;e a (per planning Cormisslon R.salwtion %a. 81 -B:) b I B: Sar '_C 51tall he a e,a'e -it' t . ` . arwc I'd in case- a, oq u.. [c ciao n.a : .Cxetlr>•.dp .n: [Is dillclal¢. n 1 4ai' : -is: The ?1];tnln; Gr.m c : :{nn m a v i :to,: a wai:et f.em the rn- Aul :event. -. (a) the strict or literal intertret.]ticn and v r t of the Sperif :cu - gLl] 'it n ..old r suit in pm clgl difficvtar eC uo nc CC SSa vv physiol "arc - ship iacons.acene with the objectives of this Resolution. (J) There arc e cepti oral are nac:L ins r: '.. ,..- o<ances o -dt stns - eablC to the property invo LxL that do not .y, }ene:atly to O .,r ptc- per._es. (c) Tha sgiet et literal int¢rorttation and enfegnreot of the spec if led t - gula:ien would depri pr F' :e the app llcaot of :il¢ges enllyad Sy the owe., o1 other pto,ortie3 in the same =one. (d) Sho 6tantie4 of the -giver 'Dili not constinme i Brant of special pri.a :e, inconsistent ,ith the 1laita:ions on other prneertios Classified in the (e) Lye gtintir.7, of t^ vaiver -ill net he detrimental to the public health, safety, o - ol[aree or materially injosious to properties or -provemsnis In the vtc.nity, My [.,vest fer vaiver shall be pre,errod In vricloq and be aide as part of the developrent application for the project which involves rbe trail. ! (per planning Cormisslon R.salwtion %a. 81 -B:) b I • RESOLUTION NO. 81 -93A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 81 -93, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI - PURPOSE, COMMUNITY, AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCN40NGA WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for the design of trails within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and adopted a similar Resolution establishing standards for the design of Regional Multi- Purpose, Community and Local Feeder Trails within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, it is the City Council's desire to establish these same standards, by City Council Resolution for the development of trails within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby: 1. Amends Resolution 81 -93 by adopting the standards, called the Equestrian Trail Guidelines for regional • multi- purpose, community, and local feeder trails; and 30 2. That the Equestrian Trail Guidelines, shall supersede those standards for equestrian trails previously adopted as part of Resolution No. 81 -93; and 3. The Equestrian Trail Guidelines shall be included in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Drawings booklet, starting with the number 1001. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Z 0 U CJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Loma Channel Design Contract Addendum No. 2 p CCG�M11Qy" C��(1 S 19- For the past six months, Staff has been working with consultants and the County Flood Control District to complete the design details for the Alta Loma Channel. As those details began to crystalize, it became apparent that the initial program would exceed assessments which could be equitably born by the District owners. The scope of work had to be modified to reduce the project cost and at the same time provide adequate protection and accommodate future development. In order to accomplish this goal, it was determined that the Alta Loma Basins should be redesigned to increase storage and to more effectively utilize the Haven Avenue Storm Drain. This revision allows the deleton of the outlet channel and the addition of two local storm drains in Wilson and Hillside Road. These work scope modifications have resulted in a modest increase in the project design budget. These modifications are outlined in the attached' Addendum No. 2. Also included f,r your review is a detailed cost analysis of work scope additions and deletions. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement for Engineering Services on the Alta Loma Channel and authorize from Storm Drain Funds an additional $3,800.00. Re4ectfully subVtted, L Attachment 0 ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES By this Addendum to "Agreement for Engineering Services" entered into on the 2nd day of December, 1982 between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation located in the State of California, County of San Bernardino, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and MILLS AND LILL ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC., with offices located at 316 East "E" Street, Ontario, California 91764, hereinafter referred to as "STORM DRAIN ENGINEER ", additional services have been requested by the "CITY" and the "ENGINEER" has proposed to complete such services as outlined below. • The proposed services to be completed by ENGINEER are as follows: ITF.M N0. ITEM 1. Delete Lines 4C, 3C, and that portion of Line 3A above its confluence with Lines 3B and 3C. 2. Add the preparation of final plans, specifications and cost estimates for Lines 3D, 3E of Project 2 -3, together with plans for the improvement of Hillside Road between Archibald Avenue and Malachite Avenue. This item includes necessary survey and soils investi- gations, but not right of way documentation. 3. Add the preparation of final plans, specifications and cost estimates for the necessary improvements to Alta Loma Basins, including basin grading plans, plans for additional culvert between basins under Hermosa Avenue and modifirati.on of the existing inlet to Haven Storm Drain. This item includes necessary survey and soils investigations and work necessary to obtain approval from State Department of Water Resources. 4. To compensate for additional scope and quantity of work, the fee set forth in Article IIA shall be in- creased by $3100 to $157,100. The fee set forth J Page 2 • ITEM N0. 1TCA 4 (cons.) under Article IIR, Subitem (a) shall be increased by $700 to $7200. 5. To compensate fox reductions in the scope and quantity of work the fees set forth under Article IIIB for "Construction Staking" and "R /W Staking" shall be reduced by $7000 to $20,000 and $3600 to $10,000 respectively. IN WIT.:ESS WHEREOF, said parties have executed this agreement on this day of , 1983. CITY OF RANCHO CUCXMONGA, a municipal corporation By ATTEST: • By City Clerk MILLS AND LILL ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. By • Job 82 -07 7 Z ��.... o 3A--�L • a •.r-Ki 3Cl .. .. CARRAR22 T 3A 3D LI! � -Lll -- HILLSIDE - ' `� IF WILSON AV E. 1 a' ALTA LOMA BASINS • ^�' ��`.,T'�;�, a BANYAN t u., I HIGHLAND AVE. --p � c LEGEND: a (l 19TH ST f PROPOSED PR=CT FEATURES EXISTING ❑RAI::AGE ASSNT. DISTR. LlMit5 ALTA LOPA CHANNEL .., RANCHO CUCAMONGA y111 11 0F11-"14L F>VS A.,v& Fe T,tl S AL11 1�4 91 - �? -SHT "/ • � 144/M cL /4, II i700 :Yr- "A;00 ...10tH .eo? 57E0. m i T zr va, I j! I. —.CDR 413. .7m woo to /co v RE vi sl� I I ;-xo J&DO L I " 7IM /3C D R500 40. , 4m �; EU0 -i4 w . loo 1100: )00 )06� 00; /'FO-O I,! awo A� wuO TI + AaE a • � 144/M U WITH UORK DELETGD AL79 LJMA G'S-CoNTmcT QCV. 52-_ 0'7 • .. ' J K wSxi SHT'°3 Gmg M0 yi u 6ae y.�w.Li i•Lrl V� �aC I M _ •E 'yI MP iT�61dT(! IEST 'FFF .P' DCl yG�C'M' 1�F�T PP �.OW�L' DLLCTO TOT /(�S 1l=♦ Piu 5 D. ICU ! ? �, I � III ��Ji I ,I 12rurn g5„I 1 �i ' I.e'Y+DOI I' IJOO lW ;I t23:L Mn lic]I6N _� �.p9cu._ �, tl I +4 t? III lo:] I .�'ao .I /oo � ' _ /SW: �. /4x.1 ;co _ �qq 4a.LM VMT"I W II T r I � t Illy f I� ,I So L+ INVR11iM7bN II rrI� R•6ni ov W.j D•L5 II.7cui % ,�ouj 4 4n11 +) qai ?s. II..�O h� 40U e`W aU F�IVNL I%.Pns :1-0-111GG�..� i, I .I III .moo : Gi I 14401 p I 4951. /3�U II; I .bo Jf CO .�... "KrOIJS _• Y oy_ . I �i, m5oj i /3ca Im I: /Soo I'I -Gwnn *,cs d5 ✓ecs y�_(loo !;.; �'� _1 L'17L J.. :✓o - ._3oq �1i - -3T? .. _ ,3cJ - (rsT �s- v.'.eT �s :I..�. It� .'f °� II I.�.3ao day; � I. ;� moo; �•.. �• I.. � nom. M1ILe T, Ice 4 i +�mnGS 7wl II: P $ i, !a? L. loD �i0. W y Evn: vP'iC 3:oi Jx' II' Y/O��U IZI� _ 6m I i0u loo I 1W 17th COMPLETED W69k I,: l4j I,l I xrQ] ! 9700 �)AJa 'DcLETeD c•.XK !'ry �t W LJM4 IL S.0 ITUCT -I;V- I VACS I)NCf(ANML) 09 L4).TV WOKK AOOcD • (3,IL - 07 jj( K. CN.� 0 .�- w� Av.trn '�SHT '-3 9. ocr 4 3A S.D. p✓ N P900 a8.T0 Aw � 1 5OX sID /000 1600 DESI&N 3Y. JOt S¢0 I /0N 40 it QOO /oar 6()14-s INVFSTI6,4TION 67m. FINAL PLANS 1060, 3500 1W.0 35tH 44W X700 170 '16c 'goo 9co T11 IeS 1400 /500 6w Soo 00 X0 CA&7 6671MAT,,S 563 so 6zo •ECT]Nrst HEARINGS L k. '110. C) .1;10 oj GVAWATC ; 400 P J00 j juo (c 31 .16.)g i,d50D j ! --coo -COJ SCO 1,4J F3ar� ocr 4 0 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NUMBER THIRTY -FIVE, (ACA 35). WHEREAS, existing provisions of the California require that, whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government for the cost of the program or increased level of service, except for specified exemptions; and WHEREAS, in the past the Legislature has granted numerous specified exemptions in mandated local programs, which have created financial hardships on local entities that are forced to participate; and WHEREAS, ACA 35 provides that whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates any increased cost, the state shall reimburse the local government agency for the increased cost; and WHEREAS, ACA 35 enables the State Board of Control to determine that appropriations are insufficient and so declare thereby causing the state • mandate to be voluntary until Board of Control determines that sufficient funds have been appropriate; and WHEREAS, ACA 35 requires the Board of Control to investigate all state- mandated local programs enacted after July 1, 1975, to determine if they are sufficiently funded, as specified, and if not, cause the duty of the local entities to carry out the program, to be voluntary if funding is not provided by next succeeding fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: City of Rancho Cucamonga supports passage of ACA 35; and 2. Strongly encourage all citizens and local entities in California to support passage of ACA 35; and 3. Commend Assemblyman Charles W. Bader for introducing such a fiscally responsible Constitutional amendment. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of ', 1983. AYES: NOES: *1 ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor 0 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE- 19lo -M REGULAR SESSION ® Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 35 Introduced by Assemblyman Rader ® March 3, 1983 Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 35--A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the state, by amending Section 6 of Article XIII B thereof, relating to state - mandated local programs. LEGISI_ {TI \'E COUNSEL '5 DICF_ST ©ACA 35, as introduced, Bader. State - mandated lord programs. Existing provisions of the California Constitution require that, whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local Q government, the state shall reimburse the local government for the cost of the program or increased level of service, • except for specified exemptions. This measure would instead provide that whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates any increased cost, tile statesha llpay the local government for the increased cost. This measure defines the membership of the Board of Control for purposes of this section and requires the board to determine whethor appropriations made, in enacting © state- mandated local programs, are sufficient to pay for the cost of the mandated progruns. This measure would further enable the board to determine that appropriations are insufficient and so declare therebv causing the state mandate to be voluntary until the board determines that sufficient funds have been appropriated. Is 0 This measure would also require the board to investigate all sLno-mandated lord programs enacted after July 1, 1975, to w SO ACA 35 —2— determine if they are sufficiently funded, as specified, and if not, cause the duty of the local entities to carry out the program, to be voluntary if funding is not provided by the • nest succeeding fiscal year. Vote: %. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State - mandated local program:.no. Resolved kv the Assembh, the Senate concurring. That the Legislature of the State of California at its 1983 -89 Regular Session commencing on the sixth clay of December, 1982, two- thirds of the members elected to each of the two houses voting therefor, hereby proposes to the people of the State of California that the Con.stitotion of the state be amended by amending Section 6 of Article XIII R thereof to read: SEC. 6. (a) 11'hcncver the Legislature or any state agency mandates a nt Ni pay -u+n er htglK-v lcvrel of se.-, -:Te am increased cost on any local gos'ernment, the state shall provide a subscntion of funds to ter»rblwe sued par the local government for fl� ernts ei smeh Nw -n +n er ifter -,fi -a level ref ser+tee the increased cost, cscept that the Legislature may, but need not, provide such subvention of funds for the following mandates: (1) Legislative mandates requested by the local agency affected; (2) Legislation defining a new crime or changing an • existing definition of a crime: or e+ (3) Legislative mandates enacted prior to January 1, 1975, or executive orders or regulations initially fmplementing legislation enacted prior to January 1, 1975. (b) The Bnard of Control. nithin .90 days of the enaetinont of the state- mandated local prggrnrn or the efRrtive dote of the stotute, Whichever is later, shall determine n'hethcr the apprnpristinn is suf!'cicnt !o pw for the cost of the mandated prggr :an. (1) If the hoard deterrninos that the appropriation is vi w a3't \J • • I I sufficient, it shall so declare. 2 (2) If the board determines that the appropriation is 3 insufficient it shall so declare, and the local entih•:s duty 4 to carry out the state - mandated local program shall be 5 suspended and compliance with the mandate shall be 6 roluntary until the hoard determines that sufficient funds 7 have been appropriated 8 (c) The Board of Control shall monitor each 9 sLafic- mandatedlorilprognvnenactedbrlheLogislature 10 for continued funding and shall determine it the 11 level of finding remains sufficient to pas• for the cost of 12 the state- mandated local program. If the board 13 determines that fording has become insufficient it shall 14 so declare, and the local entitr's duty to earn' out the 15 state - mandated !ocal program shall be suspended and 16 romph,ince it ith the mandateshall be t oluntar r until the 17 board determines that sufficient funds have been 1,S appropriatad. 19 (d) The Bo;hrd of Control shall investigate all 20 at :utc- mnndatrd local prq,rarns. as specified in 21 wbdii rsion (a), enacted after Jult- 1, 19,-.5, to determine 22 it hother the state- nundaled local programs hair been 23 funded and, if so, whether the finding has been and 24 continues to be sufficient to pav for the cast of the 25 pro, grams. lftl )eboarddotermines!hatastate- mandated 26 program teas not funded or that the funding has been or 27 has become insufficient to pay for the cost of the 23 slatrm :urdatedloca /program, the board.shallsodeclare 29 andshadlcalcudatethe current cost of the state- mandated 30 /oral program and shall report these amounts to the 31 Legislature. If by the commencement of the next 32 succeeding fiscal %car, the Logislatiure has not 33 appropriated an amount sufficient to pa 'v the local .34 rnlitios for the current cost of the identified 35 st.ah- m;nd :u6•rl local programs, the doh of the local 36 entitY to carry out an1, state- mandated local program 37 which has or s not been hded, or has born ins'uffiehenth, 3S flock(l. ,h ;d/ be ,,u,pendvd and cnrnpliance with the 39 1111-111(/1!0 shall the rotunlru.r 1112111 the bears/ d lenninos 40 that sufficient finds have horn .apyropnnh °d. I (q) Fur the pugPoses of this section, the Board of 2 Control shall coma)'t of the follon•irhg mombors: 3 (1) The Controller, acting as an ea olh'eio mhe nbor. 4 (2) The Director of Ccnrnd Sers'iccs, acting as an ex 5 officio nnuaaher. 6 (8) ;1 member appointed br and sorting at the 7 ple.uure of the Cot vi-nor, who mar be a ,state officer. 8 (4) 7•wo members representing local agencies, 9 apvointed by the Got ernor for terms Oft" 0 1 Cars. 11/ 1\ 7 • I 1111n1 P A NT1v n r`i T1 A t rtnXIO e STAFF REPORT <r � DATE: July 6, 1983__ 19T TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 1 and No. 2 The attached Engineer's Reports describe district boundaries and particular street lights for which assessments are proposed for the purpose of paying the street light energy costs. As reported to you at your last meeting, the City's budget is being impacted severly by street lighting costs, The proposal is intended to eliminate increases in this cost, except for increases in electricity prices, by assessing all future residents directly for the costs of the lights to be installed in the future. The reports cover two overlapping districts, one for arterial streets and another for local residential streets. This is due to the equal benefit being received by all residents, whether living in houses, condominiums or apartments, from the lighting on arterial and collector streets, while local street lighting only benefits those residents in the immmediate area. Local lighting in apartment and condo projects is paid privately. Details of the assessment calculations are shown in the Engineer's Reports. All dwelling units in District No. 2 (single family tracts) are also included in District No. 1, and will pay both assessments for a total of 541.55 per year (83.46 per mo.). Apartment and condominium families will pay only District No. 1 assessments of $5.69 per year. The assessing of lots or units will begin a year after the lights in the project are turned on because the first year's costs are prepaid by the builder. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached resolutions approving Engineer's Reports and setting a public, hearing for July 20, 1983 for deciding on the establishment of the districts be approved. Respectfully submi ted, L � Attachments aql Oft RESOLUTION NO. * r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1472 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located withinroadway right -of -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said ity Counci is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon certain "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting District No. 1" maps on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Z Resolution No. Page 2 • SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on July 2983, at the hour of 7:30 o.m. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will he considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Liahtinn Act of 1972: All the work • herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 61961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor • ATTEST: d q13 1` • RESOLUTION NO.* 3 A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain street lighting located therein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 83 -95 this City Council initated proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" to improve and maintain street lighting to be located in the boundaries of said Street Lighting Maintenance District and ordered the preparation and filing of a report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council that certain "City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1; and • WHEREAS, this City Council has duly considered said Engineer's Report in each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Engineer's Report is adequate and sufficient and that said Report does not require modification in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its preliminary approval to the Engineer's Report referred to in the recitals hereinabove. SECTION 2: Said Engineer's Report which is referred to in the recitals hereinabove, shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings in connection with the formation "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 111. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Ar 9 y4, Ll CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I \J Original Formati/n _lu B. ubbs ' City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS • SECTION I Authority for Report Page 1 SECTION 2 General Description Page 1 SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications Page 1 SECTION 4 Estimated Costs Page 2 SECTION 5 Assessment Diagram Page 2 SECTION 6 Assessments Page 3 SECTION 7 Order of Events Page 3 RESOLUTION APPROVING ENGINEERING REPORT Page 4 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM DISTRICT Page 5 & 6 RESOLUTION OF FORMING DISTRICT Page 7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Page 8 E • d1lC-- • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION Z. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1983 -84 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts enumerated in Exhibit A within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary • and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Is -I- %I,/ 'I Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all • or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on availabe data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1983 -84. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. 1983 -8n Estimated Assessment 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate -* 9500:. 68 9.90 58COL 45 8.75 *High Pressure Sodium vapor Lamos Rate Me's Total • 68 X 9.90 X 12 = $8078.40 45 X 8.75 X 12 = $4725.00 $ 80 .40 .. 2. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and Administration = $1000.00 3. Costs per dwelling unit: Total Annual Estimated Costs = $12803.40 + $1000.00 = $5.69 /year /unit No. of Units in District 2425 $5.69 divided by 12 = $0.47/mo. /unit Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ". These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. 2- 0 %q� • SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. ORDER OF EVENTS 1. City Council approves institution of District proceedings (6- 15 -83). 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets a public hearing data. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon proceedings. S. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with City Council. • 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. n 3- t( I EXHIBIT "A" • Properties and improvements to be included within Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: TRACT NO. OF DWELLING UNITS ARTERIAL LIGHTS 10491 20 0 9539 18 0 9584 52 0 9584 -1 47 12 9584 -2 45 0 10569 42 0 9638 25 5 11350 117 7 11609 12 4 9441 72 0 11696 7 0 10762 57 1 10277 -1 30 0 9269 53 10 11663 12019 12020 12021 12022 413 6 • 12040 328 10 9658 54 0 11734 144 6 12090 128 4 10045 10 0 10045 -1 16 3 11934 123 0 12044 177 0 12045 271 0 12046 174 12 • � ->) • _t RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be • located within roadway right -of -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ", SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the _ contemplated work, in the opinion of sai ity Council, is 6 more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon certain "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting District No. 2" maps on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4, Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolutionho. * has approved t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, Reference to said report is 'hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. �7 S I iZ Resolution No. Page 2 • SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at the first regular :meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of HeK ing: Notice is hereby given that on July 20, — 798-3, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscap in and Lighting Act of 19'2: All the work • herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. .. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 96 o the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Jon 0. Mi a s, Mayor • � S2 RESOLUTION NO.* h � — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVIONGA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain street lighting located therein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 83 -96 this City Council initated proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" to improve and maintain street lighting to be located in the boundaries of said Street Lighting Maintenance District and ordered the preparation and filing of a report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and 'WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council that certain "City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2; and • WHEREAS, this City Council has duly considered said Engineer's Report in each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Engineer's Report is adequate and sufficient and that said Report does not require modification in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its preliminary approval to the Engineer's Report referred to in the recitals hereinabove. SECTION 2: Said Engineer's Report which is referred to in the recitals hereinabove, shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings in connection with the formation "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CJ ?S� 0 CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 • Original F o r m a tyl, n ploy 6. Hubbs ' V City Engineer il c�2 57 1 I TABLE OF CONTENTS to SECTION 1 Authority for Report Page 1 SECTION 2 General Description Page 1 SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications Page 1 SECTION 4 Estimated Costs Page 2 SECTION 5 Assessment Diagram Page 2 SECTION 6 Assessments Page 3 SECTION 7 Order of Events Page 3 RESOLUTION APPROVING ENGINEERING REPORT Page 4 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM DISTRICT Page 5 & 6 RESOLUTION OF FORMING DISTRICT Page 7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Page B • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1983 -84 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for Tracts enumerated in Exhibit A within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to he considered is specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. 'Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District are: • The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division, Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. 19 -1- Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTI0.11 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on availabe data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1983 -84. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. 1983 -84 Estimated Assessment 1_ S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity ate ** 5800E 52 8-1T— *High Pressure Sodium Vapor * *SCE Schedule LS -1. All night service per lamp per month, Effective 1 -1 -83 Lamas Rate Mo's Total 152 X 8.75 X 12 $15960.00 2. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and Administration = $1000.00 3. Costs per dwelling unit: Total Annual Estimated Costs = $15963040 + $1000.00 = $35.86 /year /unit No. of Units in District $35.86 divided by 12 = $2.99/mo. Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ". These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. -2_ . ,-) r SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 1. ORDER Of EVENTS 1. City Council approves institution of District proceedings (6- 15 -83). 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets a public hearing data. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and • approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 12 -3- -5 ig EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: TRACT N0. OF DWELLING UNITS LOCAL LIGHTS 10491 20 8 9539 18 5 9584 52 15 9584 -1 47 19 9584 -2 45 15 10569 42 11 9638 25 14 11609 12 4 9461 72 32 11696 7 1 9269 53 18 9658 54 13 10045 10 5 10045 -1 16 7 a5 � of • 0