HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/09/07 - Agenda PacketUl'v or
RMIXIx) (1C%N1(11kik
CITY COUNk'IL.
AGENDA
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
September 7, 1983 - 7:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline
for submitting Chase items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meetini,. The
City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. ?1 Q! e of Allegiance to Flag.
• B. Roll Cail: Buquet _, Dahl Frost F
Schlosser , , and Mikels -i
4ppr v,1 of Minutes; July 18, 1983, August 3, 1963 and
Ann,jnt '7, 1983.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
ptember 8, 1983, 7:00 p.m. - FIRE DISTRICT BOARD
OF .`:Rh:C''0%.S, Lions Park Community Center.
9. 'Wndn'.ad3y, 3et.p =.tuber 14, 1083, 7:00 p.m. - PLANKNO COMMISSION
MF.r.1NN11'1, I.Inns Park Community Center.
20, 1983, 6:30 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION
WCR?;IM0 � IF.ARTNG for Development Code - Lion: Park Community
er.
3._ WNSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine
and non- controveraial. They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion.
ja. Approval of 'Warrants, Register No. 93 -09 -07 and Payroll enainP, I
8? -O8 in thr total amount of $335,413.05•
b. Approval Of July, 1983 Warrant. Register for Assessment }
District 82 -1 in the amount of $3,625.60 and Assessment.
District 82 -2 in the amtnmt, of $3,590.
City Council Agenda -2- September 7, 1983
• c. Forward Claim by Frederick Docks and Shaeffer Trucking Company 5
Inc, to City Attorney for handling.
d. Forward Claim by Thomas John Bryant to City Attorney for 7
handling.
e. Forward Claim by Southern Pacific Transportation Company to 9
City Attorney for handling.
f. Lease Purchase of Mowing Equipment. Lease porchase of tractor 10
and ganged mowers for maintenance purposes, to be funded from
the Inter - governmental Service Fund. Total cost $46,197•
g. Acceptance of Improvements Constructed in conjunction with 21
Assessment District 82 -1, 6th Street Industrial Area.
RESOLUTION N0. 83 -147 22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1, 6TH
STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
• h. Acceptance of Vineyard Avenue Street Improvements, FAU No, 24
M /MR- R194(2). It is recommended that Council accept as
complete the Vineyard Avenue Street, Drainage and Signal
Impro- iments, FAU No. M/MR- R194(2) and pass the attached
resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of
Completion and release performance bond and retention and
authorize final payment.
RESOLUTION N0. 81 -148 25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR VINEYARD AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS FAU PROJECT NO. M /MR- R194(2) AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
I. Acceptance of Alta Loma Park Concrete Improvements. It is 27
recommended that Council accept as complete the Alte Loma Park
Concrete Improvements and pass the attached resolution
authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion
and releaan performance bonds and retention and authorize
final payment.
RESOLUTION 10. 81 -149 28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR ALTA LOMA PARK CONCRETE
IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
City Council Agenda -3- September 7, 1983
• j. Recommend approval of agreement with Richwood Development to 30
participate in the cooperative reconstruction of 9th Street
between Baker and Madrone.
k• Acceptance of Bonds and. Agreement for Model Homes for 35
Tentative Tract No. 12316 -1 (Terra Vista), Lewis Homes
Developer located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of
Base Line Road.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -150 37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT NO. 12316-
1.
1. Setting Public Hearing for October 5, 1983 to form Landscape 46
Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Map 7349 located on the
north side of 4th Street, east of Route 15 Freeway, Lewis
Homes developer.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -151 47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 'INITIATING
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -152 5G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING ITS
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3.
RESOLUTION N0, 83 -153 56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT
OF 1972.
m. Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for S. A. 80 -09 60
located at, the northwest corner of Haven and Banyan Avenues
and suhmitted by the Southern California District of the
Lutheran Church.
RESOLUTION NO. 8 1- 154 62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
S.A. 80 -09•
City Council Agenda -4- September 7, 1963
n. Intent to Vacate an East /West Alley located between Calaveras 61
and Vinmar Avenues, south of 9th Street.
56
RESOLUTION N0, 13� -155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUC9.M0NGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIND, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE
THE EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN CALVERAS AND
VINMAR AVENUES, SOUTH OF 9TH STREET.
o. Approval of Agreement and Security for Parcel Map 6051 located 77
on the north side of Manzanita between Sacramento and Beryl
Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 31 -256 75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP
NO. 6051.
p. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7349 and Bonds and Agreement 82
submitted by Lewis Development Co. and located on the north
side of 4th Street, east or Route 15 Freeway.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -157 8+
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
7349, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
q. Release of Subdivision Sign Bonds for Jones Company - Tract 9•'.
9305/NC -012.
Sign bond for subdivision sign $500
General Outdoor Advertising
r. Loan to Redevelopment Agency. Consideration from Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency of loan to incur debt.
Recommend Council approve loan request by R.D.A. in the amount
of $1 „06,000.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -156 95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOAN TO
31 THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
s. Acceptance of Agreement for professional construction services 96
for Victoria Planned Community by Hoch Bedrosian, owner of
Runmar Enterprises.
City Council Agenda -5- September 7, 1983
t. Minor Contract I ;,difications -Army Corps of Engineers contract 106
for Recreation Development at Cucamonga /Demens Channels.
u. Acceptance of Annual Supplementary Maintenance and Emergency
Contract renewal with Laird Construction.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -03 - LEE. A 125
change of zone from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to R -3 (Multi -
Family Residential) for 1.93 acres of land located on the west
side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill
Boulevard - APN 207- 211 -24. Staff report by Michael Vairin,
Senior Planner.
ORDINANCE NO. 209 (first reading) 153
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 207- 211 -24, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF VINEYARD BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD FROM A -1 TO R -3.
• B. APPEAL OF PLANNING 0010=I0N DECISION - CONDITIONAL USE 154
PERMIT 83-11 - DATA DESIGN. Appeal of Planning Commission
decision for the temporary placement of two 1440 square foot
office trailers on 1.8 acres of land in conjunction with an
existing manufacturing facility in the M -R -T (restricted
manufacturing) zone located at 7915 Center Avenue - AFS 1077-
401-08. Staff report by Michael Vai.in, Senior Planner.
C. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS FOR PARCEL MAP 8007 LOCATED ON THE WEST 174
SIDE OF MIMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN WILSON AND HILLSIDE AVENUES
Requested by Janine Slane Tibbets developer.
D. HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR R.D. COUSINS HOUSE
(CHRISTMAS ROUSE).
RESOLUTION NO. 83-159 188
A RESOIATTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING T4E H. D.
COUSINS HOUSE aka CHRISTMAS HOUSE AS A SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC
LANDMARK.
5. NON- ADVHRTIZED PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items submitted.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. SWIMMING POOL FENCE MIGHT REVISION The, i7 ty Counc ii
r-1 minition of the city ordinances regarding fencing,
for ❑'d ^vi ng pools and spas. Gtaff report by ,Jerry Grant.,
Huildinv Offi ^ial. Recommended by the tuild,ng offinial that
the City Council direct staff' to pubiish not iflcntion of
C i'_y Council Agenda -6- September 7,
1983
e6.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
A. APPLICATION FOR HOUSING MORTGAGE BOND ALLOCATION The City
i9O
will .ply for a bond allocation with the state of California
for a new home mortgage loan program with participating
dove :no er ;. Staff report by Tim Beedle, Senior Planner.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -160
lag
A .E3CLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
9111.11 ^Ii'0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
A ?F',ICATION FOR ALLOCATION OF MORTGAGE SUBSIDY
AND FILING OF NOTICE OF SALE THEREOF WITH
BOND ALLOCATION COMMITTEE, AUTHORIZING
ER"'UTION OF PROGRAM DEPOSIT AGREEMENTS AND
,RC'i :DIN. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO,
., REQUEST FROM DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL RUBBISH RATE
201
AD.IUSTMENT. Local disposal services are requesting a g()c
onth rcllA on residential rubbish rates to beroce
.. ., ..? October 1, 1933• Staff report by Robert Rizzo,
A,lnir.strat.ve Analyst.
:. AMENDMENT TO THE BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE. Ordinance is for
20:
�, o. of clarifying, the meaning of gross reeeipto of real
•
bat�^ro'':crs.
�t
ORDINANCE NO. 20d secaaS reading)
20:
:A 7: :)RDIAANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
AMENDING S'u9 °ECTION A5 OF SECTION
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
CLARIFY THE MEANING OF GROSS RECEIPT:; OF REAL
.,: "ATE BROKERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF RUSINESS LICENSE
TA:XF's.
D. CABLE; . .bVlS10N STATUS REFORT Staff report by Robert
2nr•
Rii,,o, Adminirtrativa Analyst. Recommend City Council
;li— n mo,,it. ^mum on granting CATV licenses within the
Cit; staff to Aevo' ^p a CATV ordinance.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. SWIMMING POOL FENCE MIGHT REVISION The, i7 ty Counc ii
r-1 minition of the city ordinances regarding fencing,
for ❑'d ^vi ng pools and spas. Gtaff report by ,Jerry Grant.,
Huildinv Offi ^ial. Recommended by the tuild,ng offinial that
the City Council direct staff' to pubiish not iflcntion of
City Cou.^il Agenda -7- September 7, 1983
• _,.ns aeration of an ordinance changing the minimum fencing
height . ^nr swimming pools and setting the date of October 19,
194' fcr hearing.
ORDINANCE NO. 122 -A (first reading) ^_13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FANCHO CUCA.MONGA AMENDING THE MINIMUM HEIGHT FOR
34:4MING POOL FENCING.
9. 11DJOURNF NT
Is
July 18, 1983
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
An adjourned meeting of the City Cgtmcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was
held in the Lions Park Community Center,9161 Base Line Road, on Monday, July
18, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor Jon. D.
Mikels.
Present were Couneilmembers: Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Russet I1, Phillip
D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager,
Jim Robinson; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Development Director,
Jack Lam; ;ity Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; and City Planner, Rick Gomez.
Mayor Mikels stated the purpose of this adjourned meeting was to conduct a
general public hearing to determine the allocation of Revenue Sharing funds
for Fiscal Year 1983 -84.
• City Manager Lauren Wasserman recommended that the City Council appropriate EP
15 October 1, 1983 - September 30, 1984 (revenue sharing) for the purpose of
law enforcement services in whatever amount the City of Rancho cucamonga
ul :{rya tely receives.
'!iifr Mdk =,1a opened the meeting for public hearing for anyone wishing to
ro-- ,on(! to the City Counc's intent to utilize revenue sharing funds for law
cnlbrcemrnt.
No nuhlic testimony was received and the public hearing was subsequently
clnn -d.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to allocate the FY1983 -84
revenw• sharing funds to support the City's law enforcement services. Motion
carri,,d unanimously 5 -0.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: M,�ved by Buqurt, secorrlyd by Dahl to adjourn to a Redevelopment
Agency _ meeting. Motion carried unanimounly 5 -0. fee meeting adjourned at
7:10 p.m.
Renpeetrully submitted,
James Robinson
Assistant City Manager
• August 3, 1983
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, met on Wednesday, August 3, 1983 in the Lions Park Community
Center, 9161 Base Line Road. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by
Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Present were Counnilmembers: Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip
D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Approval of Minutes: Notion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve
the minutes of April 25, 1983, May 2, 1983, May 17, 1983, June 14, 1983, and
July 20, 1983. Motion carried unanimously with Frost and Mikels abstaining on
the Minutes of July 20th since they were not present, but at a League
Conference in Monterey.
Mr. Wasserman requested an Executive Session following the meeting to deal
with personnel matters.
•
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Thursday, August 4, 7:00 p.m, - HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION - Lions
Park Community Center.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83-7-30 and Register No. 83 -8 -3, and
Payroll ending 83 -07 -24 in the total amount of $353,350.22.
B. Forward Claim by Dorothy Busch Rackstraw to Carl Warren Company for
handling.
C. Forward Claim by Robert W. Rackstraw to Carl Warren Company for handling.
D. Forward Claim by Paul Joseph Bonello to Carl Warren Company for handling.
E. Foward Claim against the City by Chaffey Joint Union High School District
and Alta Loma High School to City Attorney for handling. (Reference the Klock
Claim).
F. Foward Claim against the City by Chaffey Joint Union High School District
and Alta Loma High School to City Attorney for handling. (Reference the Ivie
Claim).
•
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 3
ORDINANCE NO. 123B (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTION 61.0219(8)(7) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 123, RESIDENTIAL PARKING
STANDARDS.
Motion: Moved by rx-st, seconded by Schlosser to waive full reading of
Ordinance No. 1238. Mo4'p carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mr. Dahl stated that he felt there were areas in the ordinance which should be
clari.f'ed; for example, the cluster housing. This should be looked at
somstims in the future, but not tonight.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 1238.
Motion carried by the .following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
•B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -01 - CHNISTESON. A change of
zone from A-1 (limited agriculture) to C -2 (general business commercial) for
1,y.1 acros of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Ha.v„n kL.,n•�„ - APN 1077- 401 -01, 03, PlanninG Commission recommends approval
of zone change and issuance of Negative Declaration.
Xl :,or Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
Lien public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 206.
ORDINANCE NO. 206 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 1077- 401 -01 AND Op,
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FRJM A -1 TO C -2.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, - eeonded by Dahl to waive full reading of
Ordinance No, 206. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No.
?66. Motion rnrried by the following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buqu =.t, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C. ORDER TO VACATE A 20 FOOT ALLEY ADJACENT TO LOTS 2 THROUGH 12 OF TRACT
2521. Gerald Edwards, developer of D.R. 83 -08, has requested that the alley
located between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard be
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 2
G. Forward Claim against the City by Debra Thompson Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez, •
and Ruth Sanchez to City Attorney for handling.
H. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off -Sale General License for National
Convenience Stores, Inc., (Stop and Go Market) 6760 Carnelian Avenue, Alta
Loma.
I. Alcoholic Beverage Off Sale General Application for Pierce Plaza Liquor
and Delicatessen, Inc., Duane Bernd, President, 10277 Foothill Blvd.
J. Alcoholic Beverage Off -Sale Beer and Wine Application for Southland
Corporation,, 7 -11 Store 02135 -new, 8011 Archibald Avenue.
K. Recommend authorization to direct Assessment District engineer to prepare
the necessary documents to proceed with the public hearing on the Alta Loma
Channel Assessment District. (Phase II).
L. Request approval to solicit bids for the overlay of Base Line Road from
Carnelian Avenue to Vineyard Avenue.
M. Request approval to advertise for bids for Maintenance of City -owned
Traffic Signals.
N. Request approval of Alta Loma Park Concrete Contract Change Order No. 1.
0. Approval of Extension Agreements for Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046
submitted by William Lyon Company (Victoria Planned Community Phase I).
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -129
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 11934,
12044, 12045, AND 12046.
Motion_ Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE. AMENDMENT 83-04. An
ordinance amendinq Section 61.0219 «)(7), Rom ;dential Parking Standards, of
the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Wasserman stated that Council had reviewed this extensively at the last
meeting. If they had questions, Jack Lam was present to answer them.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 123B. •
•
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 3
ORDINANCE NO. 1238 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTION 61.0219(8)(7) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 123, RESIDENTIAL PARKING
STANDARDS.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to wolvx full., reading of
Ordinance No. 1238. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mr. Dahl stated that he felt there were areas in the ordinance which should be
clarified; for example, the cluster housing. This should be looked at
.sometime in the future, but not tonight.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 1238.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
ABM^ NT: None
•B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS!" AND ZONE CHANGE 83-01 - CNNISTESON. A change of
zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to C -2 (general business commercial) for
13.1 acres of land located at the northwest corner or Foothill Boulevard and
iia+en Aven•ie - APN 1077- 401 -01, 03. Planning Commission recommends approval
or zone rhnnge and issuance of Negative Declaration.
Xiior Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
th p'!rblic hearing, was closed.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 206.
ORDINANCE NO. 206 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 1077- 401 -01 AND 03,
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM A -1 TO C -2.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of
Ordlnnnce No. :106. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No.
206. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES; Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES; None
ABSENT: None
C. ORDER TO VACATE A 20 POUT ALLEY ADJACENT TO LOTS 2 THROWN 12 OF TRACT
621. Gerald Edwards, developer of D.A. 83 -08, has requested that the alley
located between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard be
August 3, 1993 Minutes
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -130
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING TO BE VACATED A 20 FOOT ALLEY ADJACENT TO LOTS 2
THROUGH 12 OF TRACT NO. 2521 GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE.
D. VACATION OF PORTION OF FRONTAGE ROW. Vacation requested by William
Campbell, developer of Parcel Map 6114, located on the south Side of Foothill
Boulevard, west of Ramona Avenue.
Mr. Rusts stated that the developer has not yet posted the necessary bonds to
accomplish the vacation. It was starve recommendation to deny the vacation.
Haver Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution 83 -80,
denying the vacation, and to waive full reading of the Resolution. Motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlossr, Frost, Mikels
• NOF,S: None
ABSENT: None
f,i`,y T;nrl: 'Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -80.
F.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -80
A RE;OL'JTIOtI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMOUOA, CALIFORNIA, DENYINU THE ORDER TO VACATE A
PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE (PARCEL MAP
6111).
lN9. Located on the north slide of V'
Item originally set. for July 6, 1983.
Mr. !lubhs °tak,d that this wan another item which has been continued several
tir.n. It io staff's recommendation that the item be tabled.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
thr public hrnring was closed.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to tabio Resolution No. 83-
11. Motion carried by the following vote'
"jP AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
ABF,FNT: None
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 6
•
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -172
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION
WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
3.
nu•
COUNCIL POLICY: Mr. Dahl stated that should set a policy directing staff that
all necessary paper work should be completed before the item is noticed and
put on the agenda. Council concurred.
•1111
F. FORM TI
ATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS MO. 1 AND 2. Formation
of two Districts is recommended: one for lights along the arterial streets,
and another for lights on local residential streets within newly recorded
subdivisions of the City. Item. originally set for July 6, 1983. Staff report
by Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Pamella Larsen, 9844 Cerise Street, who lived in one of the William Lyon
homes. They opposed the creation of the Assessment District. They felt
I' was city wide benefit and discriminated against the first time home •
buyer. She requested that Council continue item so home owners can get
together on this. If this could not be done, then they would like some
assurance that they be notified of any increase in the amounts.
There being no further public response, Mayor Mikels closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Dahl emphasized that we were looking for alternative sources of funds
since we simply did not have funds. William Lyon Company knew about this for
a long time. In fact, it was their idea. If you were not informed, then you
must talk to the representative because they should have notified you.
Mr. Frost pointed out that before incorporation we had CS -38 which was a
street light and weed abatement district. That assessisnt district was
eliminated with the intent that the city would set th <.r tax rate. That was
the same June that Proposition 13 passed.
City Clork 'Wasserman read the title or Resolution No. 83 -131.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IMF CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION
WITH THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 83 -131 •
and to waive full reading. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost., Mikels
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 7
• NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Clerk 'Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83-132.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -132
A RESOLUTION.'! OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION
WITH THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRI-'T N0. 2.
Motion_ Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 83 -132
and to ai•ve fall reading. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
ABSF, 17: None
{111iii
:layer Miksls nailed a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m.
with all m1mbers of Council present.
• 4 #a**x
LEVYING AND COLLECTING OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer.
Mr. !!uhbs ntn7ed that they were requesting that an assessment of $43•DO be set
per lot which would be a $2.00 decrease from last year's assessment.
Mayor Mittel; opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Frost expressed concern about the $15,000 excess being spent outside the
district; the money should be spent in the area where the costs are
generated. He rornmmended that we eliminate the three parkway projects:
Southeast. turner Lemon A Hermosa
l'itn at .la ^per (P.M. 5922)
Archihnld R Plies (Tract 10569)
Motion: Moved Pc Frost, seconded by Schlosser that the 1983 -84 assessment he
act au $112.00; that the proposed restoration projects in the amount of
.b15,5S5. :'i h.• dgl-ted; and that the Council_ policy be reinforced that funds
generated within a District be spent within that District.
�Mr. Hubbs sta t.ed that reducing this by $1.00 would not reduce the carry over.
Mr. Dougherty stated that in an Assessment District you may have some reserve
for contingency. It may be necessary to use these in reducing the
assessments. However, it will be necessary to change the Resolution before
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 8
•
Council to reflect the above amendments. He recommended the following
changes:
Section 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer,
as amended by the City Council, is hereby finally approved; and
Section 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal year
1983 -84 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report, as amended by
the City Council, are hereby approved.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -111.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1983 -84 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGH'r 1NG ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Motion: Approved by the following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
•
ABS3ENT: None
4H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMERT INITIAL STUDY FOR PROPOSED BERYL STREET /RELLMAN
AVENUE STORM DRAIN IMPROYEMENTS. A combined pipe and open channel storm drain
des!gned to alleviate localized drainage problems between Beryl Street, south
of Highland Avenue, and Hellman Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street. Staff
report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing, was closed.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 83-133
and to waive full reading. Motion carried by following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOE,: Nom:
ABSENT: Nor,,
City Clerk Wassrrman read title of Resolution No. 83 -133.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -133
A RE:;CLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONG,A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND GRANTING THE ISSUANCE OF A
•
NEGA'IIVF DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED BERYL
STREET /HF.LLMAN AVENUE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS.
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 9
• 5. NON - ADVERTISED PUBLIC BEARINGS
5A. PDMISSIONS TAR ORDINANCE AI4dDlENT. An amendment which defines the
meaning of "Operator ".
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
City Clerk 'Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 198A.
ORDINANCE NO. 198A (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SUBSECTION F OF SECTION 3.35.010 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DEFINE THE MEANING OF
"OPERATOR" FOR PURPOSES OF THE ADMISSIONS TAX.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of
Ordinance No. 198A. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve adoption of
Ordinance tic. 19BA. Motion carried by following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels
• DOES: Frost
ABSENT: None
'Mr. Fro:;t stated -his was to be consistent with his vote on the original
ordinance on which he also voted no).
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
6A. LONG RANGE MAJOR STREET AND DRAINAGE PROGRAM. Approval of the program
proposal is recommended in conformance with the approvals of the Planning and
Advisory Commissions. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. There being no response,
the mectinv was closed.
City G1-rk Nasonrman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -134,
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, THE LONG - RANGE. MAJOR
STREET AND DRAINAGE PROGRAM PRIORITIRS.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution tic. 83-
�134 and waive full reading. Motion carried by following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 10
ABSENT: None
•
6R. AWARD OF CONTRACT. Recommend awarding of contract for Hellman Avenue
Improvement Program to lowest responsibile bidder. Staff report by Lloyd
Hubbs, City Engineer.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the
meeting was closed.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to award the contract for the
Hellman Avenue Improvement program to Matich, the low bidder, in the amount of
$566,771.00 plue a 10% contingency. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
7. CITY ATTORNRY'S REPORTS
7A. A RESOLUTION MAKING CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.6. Staff report
by Robert Dougherty, City Attorney.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -135.
RESOLUTION N0. 83-135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
SECTION 1094.6 APPLICABLE TO
JUDICIAL
REVIEW OF
•
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS THE CITY
HAD PURSUANT
TO CODE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the
meeting was closed.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 83-135
and to waive full reading. Motion carried by following vote:
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
7B. PICTURE ARCADES. Proposed ordinance regulates the interior design of
pivture arcades. This type of ordinance has been upheld by appeals courts,
both in California and in the federal system.
Mr. Dougherty stated the ordinance would prohibit any enclosed booths for the
showing of pictures.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was:
Jeff Sceranka asked if this would prohibit the showing of cartoons which
are crown at Chuck -E- Cheese's Pizza. The City Attorney stated this
ordinance would. •
There being no further public comment.,, the public hearing was closed.
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 11
0ity Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 207.
ORDINANCE NO. 207 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING 'TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADD; NB CHAPTER 9.12 THERETO TO REGULATE THE INTERIOR
DE.STSN OF PICTURE ARCADES.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive full reading of
Ordinance No. 207. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikelo set oecond reading of Ordinance No. 207 for August 17.
Mr. frost su,gest that the Chamber of Commerce provide some input before the
next meet:rg.
7C. AMENDMENT TO THE BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE. Ordinance is for purpose of
clarifying the weaning of gross receipts of real estate brokers.
Mr. Wasserman requested that the item be continued to September 7th meeting.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to continue item to September
7. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
0 ORDINANCE NO. 208 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SUBSECTION A5 OF SECTION 5.04.290 OF THE RANCHO
CU AM^NGA MUNICIPAL CODE' TO CLARIFY THE MEANING OF GROSS
RECEiP'IS OF REeL ESTATE BROKERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF
BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES.
8. COUNCIL BUSIRM
BA. CONSIDERATION OF THE H. D. COUSINS HOUSE (CHRISTMAS HOUSE).
Mayor Mikels earned the meeting for public comment. Addressing Council were:
Arthur Rrid n, concurred with the historical designation for the Cousins
How; se. He al nn aidrenred the future use or the structure. Be encouraged
the Cnune;l to considor the Bed and Breakfast use for the house. He
stat.nd th,t when they traveled, they tried to stay at Bed and Breakfast
Inns; they were always very nJce.
Adi Cooper nnnouraged Council to make thin an historical landmark.
Mr. Johnson, curator of the Hou ^e under the County, pointed out that a
single window has replace the triple upper windows. He hoped that Council
would have thin corrected.
Mr. Buquet stated he had wanted thin delayed until the matter was resolved in
the courts. It is now resolved, and he had no objections to placing an
historical designation on the House now.
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 12
Mr. Johnson encouraged the selection of Beatrice Schaff.
Mr. Frost suggested we give this more time to contact each one.
Mr. `c.._ stated that Council has had time.
Mayer Mikels asked for those in favor of the selection of Carmen Navarette.
AYES: Frost
Mayor Mikels asked for those in favor of the selection of Beatrice Schaff.
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels
Action: Mayor Mikels announced the new Historical Commissioner was Beatrice
.Schaff.
0001*
Mr. Dahl stated he was concerned atout the ordinance regulating the heights of
fences around pools and spas. He felt this should be reconsidered. Concensus
was that ntaff should search this out and bring it back to Council with a
staff report and necessary documents for consideration.
Mr.�• •
Mr. Sch lower stated he would not be at the September 21st meeting.
Mr. Dahl stated he would be absent from the August 17th meeting.
•
Mr. Dahl stated that since this wasn't going to be part of a park like he
wanted, then we had better protect the House.
Action: Council concurred that a Resolution designating this as a City
historical landmark should come forth.
8B. DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE FOR LEAGUE ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
After taking a poll as to who would be attending the Conference, it was found
that only Buquet and Frost would be attending. Council concurred in making
Mr. Buquet the voting delegate and Mr. Frost the alternate for the League
Annual Conference.
8C. CONSIDERATION OF FILLING VACANCY ON THE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION
COMMISSION.
Council had received two applications: Beatrice (Trix) T. Schaff and Carmen
A. Navarrette.
Mayor Mikels recommended that Beatrice Schaff be selected to fill the vacancy.
Mr. Buquet nominated Carmen Navarrette.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing Council were:
•
Ada Cooper encouraged the selection of Beatrice Schaff.
Mr. Johnson encouraged the selection of Beatrice Schaff.
Mr. Frost suggested we give this more time to contact each one.
Mr. `c.._ stated that Council has had time.
Mayer Mikels asked for those in favor of the selection of Carmen Navarette.
AYES: Frost
Mayor Mikels asked for those in favor of the selection of Beatrice Schaff.
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels
Action: Mayor Mikels announced the new Historical Commissioner was Beatrice
.Schaff.
0001*
Mr. Dahl stated he was concerned atout the ordinance regulating the heights of
fences around pools and spas. He felt this should be reconsidered. Concensus
was that ntaff should search this out and bring it back to Council with a
staff report and necessary documents for consideration.
Mr.�• •
Mr. Sch lower stated he would not be at the September 21st meeting.
Mr. Dahl stated he would be absent from the August 17th meeting.
August 3, 1983 Minutes
Page 13
a*s **
9. ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
is
10
0
August 17, 1983
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
on 'Wednesday, August 17, 1983 in the Lions Park Community Center. The meeting
was called to order at 7:35 p.m. oy Nayor Jon D. Mikels.
Present. were Councilmembers: Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser
(arrived at 7:110 p.m.), James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development
Director, Jack Lam; City Enginer, Lloyd Hubbs; Community Services Director,
Bill Hollny.
Absent: Counr,ilmember Richard M. Dahl, who was on vacation.
• :1p ^roval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Buquet to approve
minutia of June 30, 1983. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0 -2. (Dahl and
,S _..l,snar absent).
2_ ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Thursday, August 18, 7:00 p.m. - PARKS COMMITTEE - Lions Park Community
Center.
B. Tue.^,Jny, August 30, 7:00 p.m. - FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY PLAN - Lions Park
Community Center.
C. Tuenday, September 6, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSION - Lions Park
Community Center.
D. Tuecdiy, C�:ptember 6, 6:30 p.m. - DEVELOPNF.NT CODE PUBLIC HEARING - Lions
Park Community Center.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approv:l of Warrants and payroll, Register No. 83 -08 in the amount of
$116,157.57 and Register No. 83-08 -11 in the amount of $50,203.5P
10 D. Approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Warrant Register No. 6 -83 in the
amount of $458,999.89.
City Council Minutes -2- August 17, 1983
C. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Felipe Delapiedra for On -Sale Beer Beer •
6 Wine Eating Place, Felipe's, located at NIF corner of Foothill and
Archibald.
D. Forward Claim against the City by Edison Company to Carl Warren Company
and City Attorney for handling.
E. Forward Claim against the City by Mary R. Seery to Carl Warren Company and
City Attorney for handling.
F. Request authorization to advertise for bids for construction of sidewalk
improvements on the east side of Sapphire Street, between Banyan Street and
north of Vinmar Avenue.
G. Request approval of improvement Extension Agreement submitted by Data -
Design Laboratories for Tract 11428 located on the east side of Center Avenue,
north of Foothill Boulevard.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -136
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
Ct1(AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT E %TENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11428.
H. Request approval of Parcel Map 6596, Bonds, Agreement, and Real Property •
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by A and R Equipment
Company, located at the northwest corner of Lucas Ranch Road and 4th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-137
A H99OLUTION OF T,iE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM A AND R
EQUIPMENT COMPANY, FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW, AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-138
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUPSMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO, 6596,
(TFN'rATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6596), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
ANJ IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
I. Rreommend awa Mang contract for maintenance of City -owned traffic signals
to Computer Service Division, the lowest responsible bidder.
J. Rennmmend acceptance of Agreement, Bonds, and Final Map of Tentative Tract
No. 12237 and approval of Guarantee of Payment Agremeent for Assessment
District No. 82 -2 submitted by Dick Scott, developer, located at the North
City limits on the East side of Hermosa Avenue. •
City Council Minutes -3- August 17, 1983
•
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
TMPRO'VEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12237.
K. Reco -nand acceptance of Agreement and Bonds for Tract 12317 -1 submitted by
Lewis Homes, developer, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of
Base Line Road.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -140
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CJCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT NO. 12317 -1.
L. Recommend approval of Agreement and Bonds submitted by David Miller and
Hub Distributing, Inc, for Conditional Use Permit 81 -03, located on the
northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -141
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
• CUCAMONG.A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-
03.
M. Recommend approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agrnement submitted by Lee Selter and Nancy Haight for a single family
residence, located at 12982 Victoria Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM LEE SELTER
AND NANCY HAIGHT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLER::
TO SIGN THE SAME. (12982 VICTORIA AVENUE)
N. necnnmcnd approval of Real Property Improvement and Lien Agreement
hm:tt-!d by OcnroA and Carolyn Douglas for the development of a single family
hone located it 11151 Fin,h Street.
,fij1SOLUTION NO. 83 -143
A RF;;OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM GF,ORGE AND
CAROLYN DOUGLAS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
Is TC SIGN THE SAME. (10151 FINCH STREET).
0. Recommend approval of Quitclaim Deed of drainage and flowage easements due
to street construction in conjunction with development of Tract 12237, Dick
Scott, developer.
City Council Minutes -4- August 17, 1983
•
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING QUITCLAIM DEEDS TO DICK
SCOTT, INC., FOR TRACT NO. 12237.
P. Recommend approval of renewal of lease agreement for the Sheriff's
Department Substation for one year period, September 1, 1983 to August 31,
1984, with an additional year option thereafter.
Q. Recommend approval of intent to annex tracts 11163, 12019, 12020, 12021,
12022, 1202;, 12024, 12025, 12184, 11173, 11173 -1, 11144, and 12090 as
Annexation Nc. 14 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO •
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER
TUE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,
AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO.
R. Request authorization of payment of $1,000 per month to the Rancho
Cucomor,P.a Chamber of Commerce for the months of July, August, and September.
S. Release of Bonds:
Tracts 9212 and 9240 - located between Hellman Avenue and Beryl, north of
B m7an.
ruhdivision Bond: $6,000
Tract 9637 - located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Street and Lemon
Avenun.
Monumentation Cash Bond $2,750.00
T. Set public hearing date of September 7, 1983 for Appeal of Planning
Commission Decision, CUP 83 -11 - Data Design Laboratories. Appeal of Planning
Comm L^sion decision for the temporary placement of two (2) 1440 square foot
office trailers on !.8 acres of land in conjunction with an existing
manufacturing facility in the M -R -T (restructed manufacturing) zone located at
7915 Center Avenue - APN 1077- 401 -08.
City Council Minutes -5- August 17, 1983
O
U. Set public hearing date of September 7, 1983 for Environmental Assessment
and Cone Change 83 -02 - Lee. A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture)
to R -3 (multi - family residential) for 1.93 acres of land located on the west
side of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-
211-2'1.
V. Set public hearing date of September 7, 1983 for Historical Landmark
Sesignation for the H.D. Cousins House (Christmas House).
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent Calendar as
submitted. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0 -2 (Dahl and Schlosser absent).
4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items S- Ibmitted.
5. ORDINANCES (RON ADVERTISED) FOR CONSIDERATION
5A. PICTURE ARCADE ORDINANCE. An ordinance regulating the Interior design of
. picture ar ^ades.
Mayor Mi'rels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public, hearing was closed.
(COUn^.ilma) Phillip D. Schlosser arrived - 7:40 p.m.).
City Clerk 'Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 207,
ORDINANCE NO. 207 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADDING CHAPTER 9.12 THERETO TO REGULATE THE INTERIOR
DESIGN OF PICTURE ARCADES.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to waive full reading. Motion
onrried unanimously 4 -0 -0. (Dahl absent).
Motion_ Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser, to approve Ordinance No.
207. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYE;: Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels
NOES: None
ABSENT: Dahl
F J
City Council Minutes -6- August 17, 1983
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
6A. RECOMMND AWARDING BASE LINE ROAD RESURFACING CONTRACT. Resurfacing to
be done between Carnelian Street to 1900 lineal feet east. Staff will receive
bids on August 17, 1983 an,' will present the results at the Council meeting.
Recommend awarding contract to the lowest responsible bidder and to authorize
the funding for the project.
Mr. Ruble recommended that the contract be awarded to Fontana Paving, the
lowest bidder, for a total amount of $68,161.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the
meeting was closed to further public comment.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to award the Base Line
resurfacing contract to Fontana Paving, the lowest bidder, at $68,161.00.
Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1 (Dahl absent).
There were no items.
7. CITY ATTORNEI'S REPORTS
B. COUNCIL BUSINESS •
8A. Mr. 3Chl033er stated that Data Design Laboratories wanted to put in some
temporary office trailers. The City has a time limit of six months, but they
will need two years. He felt they were a good company and should do all we
can to help them.
Mr. Wasserman stated there has been an appeal fileki and a part of the appeal
was the use of the trailers._ They are also asking that the street
improvements or Center Avenue be waived. The appeal is set fcr September 7.
Mr. Schlosser stated that he did not know they had filed an appeal.
83. Mayor Mikels stated that in our tentative budget there was a request to
activate an architect for the city facilities. He felt it would be in the
best interest of the City to get an architect now since the County has begun
to grado. He felt an update from the staff shoulc be provided Council as to
where this aas le.t off. Council concurred.
8C. Mayor Mikels had received a verbal announcement from Dr. T. Harrell Allen
that because of time constraints, he would not be able to continue serving on
the Parks Advisory Committee. He wouid continue his term on the Advisory
Commission. Mayor Mikels stated we should make that selection on September
21, setting a deadline for applications on Friday, September 16th at 12 noon.
Mr. Frost felt that since the Mayor had received only a verbal resignation •
that the Mayor should send a letter indicating the action taken based on the
verbal request pending some written notice from him.
Council concurred.
City Council Minutes -7- August 17, 1983
•
9. ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to adjourn the meeting to an
Executive Seasion not to reconvene this evening. Motion carried unanimously
4 -0-1 (Dahl absent). The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
0
is
R867 CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WARRANT
RECONCILIATION 9/07/83 ME
WARR A YEN
/ V E N C 0 R N A M E
WARR
JOVRNA` OISCWNT NET
2523
FNINGTUN
t`RI MAR FOMES
DATE
REFEPENCE
IR959 8798
TRANSACTION INC
8/17/d3
15.00-
2 LINES
L
C
4 ASSOC
YT C SA
UCTS
FLS
4,
6.
CITIES SIGN SER
RKS ASSOC OF CA
19009
2500
C ((ROPE
9iC1 /83
6.672
19010
2523
FNINGTUN
t`RI MAR FOMES
9,C7 /A3
:t5
J. 150. P"
IS311
19012
V110
VUID
VENLOR lIl_ 2575
JE6EOR 1.0. 2575
9,07/ ^3
9,07/53
2515
CU[AMONGA CO WATER 01ST
9 /C7193
2,A97.61
B013
014
2595
LU AMUNGA PRIN114G
9YC7/63
al ",
19015
2641
CARL♦ WALDE4
9:01/03
1,534.50
19016
2650
DAILY REPORT
9'07/P3
1.019.66
19017
2100
CEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
9 /C1 /03
18, SGO-00
190118
DESERT PACIFIC CHARTER
9..o?/R3
225.00
z272o5
p
CiN b
8T
21 215.7?
19020
2825
CIe TLIVERTy
ELL 6 COMM SYSf EMS
9: /w3
9,07/03
45.25
19021
19022
2993
4060
FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND 1
9/07/03
826.03
19023
4102
FIRST AM TITLE INS 0,0
9/07/83
3%50
19024
19025
4130
4175
FOOTHILL LAWNM(V&R
FROST JAMES
ERV
9/07/143
9/07/83
13.75
250. 0,0
19026
4585
GENERIC EINOINO
9 /07/P3
93.96
19027
4589
GENERAL ELECTVC
9/07;23
233.76
19028
4600
CFNERAL TCLEIDGME
CO
9 /07/23
5.919.67
19029
468?
GOMEZ, RICK
9107/83
5CO.00
19030
4775
[RANT, JIRY R
9107/93
325.0C
19031
4900
VOLLEY WILLIAM L
91CI103
305.01
19032
4915
HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
9 /C7 /P3
091.11
19033
4975
S M HOYT LUMBER CO
9 /C7 /P3
10.27-
14034
4995
1U905. LLOYD
9/07/03
563.lc
19 D35
4999
FYATT CEL NON TE
9/07/9,3
162.L'r
19036
5055
I YATT RE OCN CY
9/97/23
376.48
19031
5110
IPM
9107/ ^.3
66:.90
-1038
5275
INTL CITY MCAT ASSOC
9/07/13
21.75
11,039
5326
INTL RT CF WAY AS ROC
910,7103
65.G
19040
6115
J H CL'NCPITI
9/07/X3
4.776.83
19041
6140
JERSEY INTFRNATIDNAL GR
9 /0,7 /L3
239.71
I'1OA2
6SH5
KING EEARING INC
9 /C1 /A3
4.r4
6600
KING ENGINEERS, L C
9/07153
218 ".c:
1:243
41
6618
KRUSE, JOAN
9 10,7 /V3
90,._;
19045
6645
LAM JACK
9/071X3
500.0:
19046
6721
LEAENE OF CALIF CITIES
9107/93
575.0
I904O
6963
MC CEE ELECTRIC INC C
R /57/13
9/07/-3
P5L.74
19048
6900
MC KAUGHAN PE, RIIEEAT
480.00
R567 CIT RANCHO CNCINONGA
NA0.0. A A V I N C 0 R N A M E
19049 6999 MNA
19050 7100 M C M REFRIC /HTG
` 19051 71160 MANN ASSOC. BILL C
14052 T230 NPICH AM. KAREN C
19053 7240 MEARES NFL
` iaoii 7 410 HILLS t PSSOC. RICHARD
•
•
F
MGHT
ICE CO
INIC
S INC
ITY
T. A H
SIC
CORP
ERVICE
INC
PNO
INST. THE
NT OFFICE
CARL
LAUREN M
RING CO
PUBLISHERS
A'11
WARRANT RECONC TICN 9/07/83
HAARR rtEOEN VISCOUNT NET
1, 1
1
L7
1
I, B
l.I
t.
11.
6.
4b.
2•
5,
6. 1J0. P.0
I JC.Jf
It.C2
<L 5n
291.55
11 5.0^ C'
t4 ?.CP
5J.(•n
p.50
671.JM1
0 ^.0
Pl.t. L
nD.se-
210.5!
Sts. ib
Ic r. <,
u s.n
Tf.rT
FINAL TOT •i1 181.514.8)
v
R� z
1 I
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DATE
WARRANT M
7/00/83
290
7/18/83
293
7128/83
292
VENDOR
Hutch Bedrosian
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Hatch Bedrosian
WARRANT REGISTER JULY
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1
ACTIVITY
Contract Services
Office Supplies
Contract Services
ACCCUNT t'
AMOUNT
49 -23 -28
$2,440.00
49 -23 -24
33.60
49 -23 -28
1,152.00
TOTAL
$3.625.60
„1
Cj&OF RANCHO COCAMONGA
DATE WARRANT If
7/18/83 510
VENDOR
• WARRANT PEGISTER July
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -2
ACTIVITY ACCOUNT n
Don Owen 6 Associates,Inc. Contract Services 49 -24 -28
TOTAL
•
AMOUNT
$3,690.00
$3,690.00
0
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA�_s.Nt
AOMINISTB.JION J
CIAPM FOR DAMAGES AUG 28 19g3
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY AN pry
7,80ilhll(1Y11(240516
Name of Claimant
Date of t of
a want
tl) FREDERICK DOCKS and
(1) 12/16/74
St61E FFER 1RUCKING CO?.PANY INC.
41 ress o a want ty uce
em T. ep one
er
(ll 601' Parch Sc reec, Oita Lomn. CA
f1) 800.58E 17:4
S:) 1'9:3 I:h iccram Bc loan da CA
-meta
sir ss A ress o a mane ty State
Business Telephone
Number
(1) 714- 681 -3823
Give iddress A, telephone, no, to c you
Claimant's Occupation
desire notices or communications to be sent
regarding this claim: JOHN F. CLOUGH
Truck in
a emnt • Social
eeur t)
Suite 720, 7700 Wilshire Died.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
MD.-
^••_•• - •• any q empsoyees :nvoxveo
Dete:.a!,(„c 1n INJURY or DAMAGE:
It.: See Plaintiff's Complaint
GFere did DAMAGE or INLJVRY occur. escr e fully an octte on agram an
reverse side of this sheet. Mhere appropriate, glue street names and addresses
and measurements for landmerks:
• :ourch Street b Etiwando Avenue, County of San Bernardino
See attached Plaintiff's Complaint
TI—escribe in detail hw DAMAGE or INJURY occurred:
This claim is for Indemnity, Contribution, Declaratory Relief and
Property Damage. See attached CROSS- COfR'LAINT filed by claimants with
Why do you c a a county is responsible
See attached CROSS - COMPLAINT
Lescribe in detail each or
See attached CP,OSS- COMPLAIN'[ filed by claimants
La.;mip,e an ;or n ury nvesc Race y police or Shari" or California vay
Patrol' 1'es Name of agency that investigated ,Ontario PD, CHP, 5 San Bernardino Co.
were paramedics or ambulance called? Yes If so, name Coorty or City
nmbulnnce See PI.tintiff', Complaint If injured, state date, time ,
name and address of doctor of your first visit?
IlusPl tal Address Phone
Dartcr_ Address Phone _
Dor t c r Add,... nett...
This Claim oust he signed on Reverse
Side.
'w ITNFSSE5 TO DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known
to have intonation:
851 Nncth Grand Ave.
Name James Hodge Address Colton, CA Phone •
7-771 rt! 4ra n<i A,
Name D ° °i" 11 °des Address Ccl ton. CA Phone
Name Address Phone
e amount c ume , as of t e ate ac pre sea ea cton o c a e • w, s eowpute
as follovs:;iec attached Flaintiff's ConPlaine and attached. Cms,Cnrnlainc
filed by claimants.
Damages incurred to date (exact):
Damages to property ........ ..............................$
Expenses for ss_dieal and hospital care .........::........$
Loss of earnings ....................
Special damages for ...............$
General da. ges ............ ..............................$
Total Damages to Date ...........................
Total amount claimed as of presentation of this claim 3
Estimated prospective damages AS far as known:
Future expenses for medical and hospital care.. ..........$
Future loss of earnings .... ..............................3
Other prospective special damages ........................3
Prospective general damages. ...... ......................$
Total estimated prospective damages ................}
READ CAREFULLY
INDICATE
SNOW the loss Lion and pgO�L ion of vehicle($) at point o� impact. NORTH
9H= your vehicle as f > the other vehicle as 12
SnuW the name of the at at(sj, location of step sign signals.
- - / uuL
Sig•cntnre at 6.arsnnt or person tiling ype or print name. Date:
on his behalf giving relationship to 8/'9/8]
.IOHN % CLO UGH
Clalnan[, C' C � Adorn ev for Dcf endants FR CO. It
DOCKS b SHAIiFFFP. TRIIGKIAG CO. INC ,8
^u Tp; presentation Vt a 0 .e c a m s a C ony:: Tp; pra5eptat On .e c a m s a ony enilCodeS
1��
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga
city Hall
9320 Base Line Road
Cucamonga, California
The undersigned makes the following claim for damages
against the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Section 910
of t!ie Government Code:
A. NAME: Thomas Bryant
ADDRESS: 0204 Klusman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
'PHONE: 714) 989 -3246
B. .POST OFFICE ADDRESS TO WHICH THE PERSON PRESENTING
CLAIM DESIRES NOTICES TO BE SENT IS AS FOL4gWS:
Vinnedge, Lance s Glenn, Inc.
Attorneys at Law
204 North San Antonio Avenue
Ontario, California 91;62
C. DATE, PLACE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES OR TRANSACTION
• WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE CLAIM ASSERTED ARE AS FOLLOWS:
DATE OF ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE: 5 /29/82
PLACE: Intersection of 9th. Street and Vineyard
City of Rancho Cucamun <Ia.
IF MOTOR VEHICLES WERE INVOLVED, SNOW MAKES, YEARS,
MODELS, AND LICENSE, NUMBERS, AND OWNERS OF ALL
VEHICLES:
1976 brown Chevrolet Malibu, California License No. 764
NQJ, registered to Carmen Garcia; and motorcycle owned
by claimant.
DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCE'S:
On Saturday, May 29, 1982, Thomas Bryant was driving
his motorcycle along Vineyard Avenue when the car
driven by Carmen Garcia pulled out frot;, Ninth Street
and travelled east, crossing Vineyard and causing a
collision of the two vehicles.
At the time of the accid.:nt referred to herein Vineyard
Avenue at or near its )uictuve with Ninth Street and
EXHIBIT "A
.,
areas adjacent thereto war, u, a danyi_rous condition in
that, among other things, there were certain view •
obstructions, created by Lhu roadway creating a
hazardous condition for forsecable careful users of the
above mentioned roadways. The traffic control devices
were not sufficient for the intersection..
The City of Rancho Cucamonga i:c further claimed to have
notice of the dangerous condition of its property since
the road condition complained of existed for an
unreasonable length of time during which the City had
reasonable opportunity to correct said condition. The
City of Rancho Cucamonya has a continuing duty to
maintain its property in a safe condition.
D. A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INDEBTEDNESS, OBLIGATION,
INJURY, DAMAGE. OR LOSS INCUINIEU SO FAR AS IT MAY BE
KNOWN AT THE TIME OF PRESENTA':ION OF THIS CLAIM IS AS
FOLLOWS: „ ,
Personal injuries sustained by the claimant, Thomas
Bryant, property damage, loss of earnings and earning
capacity, and medical expenses incurred.
E. THE AMOUNT CLAIMED AS OF THE' DATE OF THE PRESENTATION
OF THIS CLAIM, INCLUDING THl: ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ANY
PROSPECTIVE INJURY, UAMA(,E OR LOSS, INSOFAR AS IT MAY •
BE KNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE PRESENTATION OF THIS CLAIM,
TOGETHER WITH THE BASIS OF COMPUTATION OF THE AMOUNT
CLAIMED IS AS FOLLOWS:
Medical expenses incurred to date in an undetermined
amount and medical expenses to be incurred in the
future in an unknown amount, loss of earningsand
earning capacity together with general damages in the
amount of SI,OU0,000.00
F. WITNESSES, IF ANY, WERE AS FOLLOWS:
' Jnknown to date, investigation is continuing.
DATED: September 2, 1902
VINNHLGE, LANCIi 6 GLENN, INC.
By �_ 1t L t! L� i �l�e. LI
ild ro lJ J. Lance
Attorneys for Claimant
-2-
•
,I
�3
E
O. w'
• MEMORANDUM TO
ALL DEFENDANTS
IN
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, et al.,
V.
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
in
SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT
NO. 810433
As was noted in the December 8, 1982, Statement in Support
of Claim for Refund of Property Tax covering the fiscal years
July 1, 1978 to June 30, 1982, a federal action is pending
before the United States District Court, Northern District of
California, in that court's Docket No. C 81 4848 SW, with
• respect to the fiscal years July 1, 1979, to June 30, 1982.
There is considerable overlap in that federal and the present
state action. The present state action is in large part
protective, but not entirely, because, e.g., the federal
court has upon the Board of Equalization's motion abstained
in the federal action as to, roughly speaking, issues not
stemming from section 306 of the federal Railroad Revitalization
and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976.
Because the present state action is in large part protec-
tive, it probably should not be pressed for early resolution.
The undersigned will not, however, in view of what is being
presently experienced in the largely parallel case pending
in Sacramento Superior Court, No. 282416, with respect to the
fiscal years July 1, 1974 to June 30, 1977, agree to any
suyye5tions Of suspension of responsive ....t_onn by dc'ondants,
l
as was done in that Sacramento case for the convenience of •
all parties. This of course is not to say that customary
courtesies will be refused where practical difficulties are
experienced by defendants. Agreement to reasonable exten-
sions of time will certainly be forthcoming.
Dated: August 5, 1983
IX, � . LV
ARNOLD 1. WEBER
Attorney for Plaintiffs
-2-
A
r1
L_J
u
L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 23, 1983
T0: City Council
FROM: Finance Directot"._
SUBJECT: Purchase of mowing equipment
f
Tjl
C.. Q
Attached are copies of quotes for the budgeted mowing equipment
the Public works Department plans to purchase during the 83 -84
fiscal year. During the budget process it was agreed that this
equipment would be bought through the lease purchase process.
Th.:refore, the following information is based on that approach.
Written quotes:
Whitney Machinery $46,197.00
C. R. Jaeschke 49,408.15
Phone Quotes:
Foothill Independent 60,828.72
First Interstate (declined to quote) --
Recommendation:
Proceed with the lease purchase program for the tractor and
mower from Whil,. y Machinery at a lease purchase price of
$46,197.00, payments being, $769.95/mo. Also recommend a
slight adjustment to inter - governmental service fund budget
p,�ge 47, last item ;:der a- r- i-,1ty information, to $9,240.
Thare is no effect to the General Government operating fund
and depreciation costs will not be felt until the purchase
transaction has been completed.
IIJI: /wa
/o
1977
"My
P O. BOX 1059 -20 IOWA AVENUE
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
AREA CODE 7W682 -5353 825 -18V
TO City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Page 1 of 2
QUOTATION 9
DATE 8 -12 -83
ATTENTION: Dave Leonard
QTY
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
1
1983 Model John Deere Wheel Tractor, Model 401D
cor.IVUW —'
equipped with the following:
. CLNrOI{I rO �PCMN.II Aff Ca NNI
62 net flywheel RP, diesel engine (66 gross RP)
Low center of gravity design
8 forward 8 reverse speeds
Continuous live, 540 RPM PTO
"Oa- the -go11 hydraulic direction reverser
Category I1, 3 point hitch w/ adjustable arms
16.9 - 24, 6PR (R3) turf tires, rear
Ilt - 15, 8PR (F3) flotation type tires, front
•
28 GPM hydraulic pump
"On- the -go" differential lock
Deluxe seat
Power steering
R.O.P.S. Canopy w/ roof and 3" seat belt
Full hydraulic, wet disc brakes, self- adjusting
Reverse alarm
Pull vandal protcc�ln„ on tractor
(All other standard equipment as specified on
attached spec sheet)
Attachment:
(1) Roseman (Model HG -7) 7 gang hydraulic power
driven Mower
All necessary equipment as required and /or explained
nn attached Mower spec sheet to facilitate installatio
eL nmger un JD 4UlD.
n Rancho Cucamonca I miw'"' 60 -90 days T(" As specified
Bill Cray, Sales Representative
.CcVu er
' -�' ' I ! T t"
wlr.vnnonlrn�m�rusu•vF
eccnuo., I,,w — o.n
x14
cor.IVUW —'
>w.+lu'h C1:..�;rC= : ^. F.••C•. ^. •Y .e�IYn wO,Rn ro l.Wf MS(WI.IgN
. CLNrOI{I rO �PCMN.II Aff Ca NNI
1MFn {�CCf %nwCf Ce✓q MI % M[CI TO � WT W Ct V4[w FI1CWLer. Glv4N 1[PFPt
rtLLOW ICUIICrnFl9
IfM (r4F)
axaw.n(wfn 1
r
mnm
/Ii ACHIPIERY.
PO 90 %1069 -2O IOWA AVENUE
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
AREA CODE 714,682-5353 82 &1812
TO City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Page 2 of 2
•
QUOTATION
DATE 8 -12 -83
ATTENTION, Dave Leonard
Aik
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
Prices include: Installation of mower on JD 401D
eecrvonm aau .'e
Service school with City operators and
c.,iro.n+ DATF
IlW:W OlAVT V114 drCm V ULLER 41R blO Mj tIA WOIFA? N
mechanics to cover necessary adjustmen
s,
repairs and sharpening(of mower) on bo
h
tractor and mower.
Tractor carries One year, 1500 hour warranty.
:1o•der is aarrantied by supplier (C.R. Jaeschke) for 90
ays.
Net cash price
36,0(,5.82
6% sales tax
2,163.95
Total Cash Price
38,229.77
1) Optional Lease /purch -se
a) lst payment in advance
b) 60 month term (others available on request)
c) full pay -out (no balloon or residual payments
d) 8% A.P.R.
e) $769.95 per month
;v<
Rancho cnrnm n,•,L 60 -90 days ass ecif ied
rmn;..e.LnuLCl ecwn wc:elxueeLO ewv.uvn:.we w�cr wlu r.<<�rr. ,.Ir. •. x�n
re�on ic�niouLRl
r.. n.n
Bill Gray -Sale., Representative
+wrn c +nx ell vrrI.�n
•w
eecrvonm aau .'e
c.,iro.n+ DATF
IlW:W OlAVT V114 drCm V ULLER 41R blO Mj tIA WOIFA? N
• �WWIIl 1tA C4 NMI
Whitney Machinery, Inc,
rmn;..e.LnuLCl ecwn wc:elxueeLO ewv.uvn:.we w�cr wlu r.<<�rr. ,.Ir. •. x�n
re�on ic�niouLRl
r.. n.n
C. R. JAESCMKE, INC.
ISYJ Cou0.ta DRrvE GOWER EQUIPMENT
Sa.0 U�LO Gar wm
COMMERCIAL TURF
July 8,1983
Sir. David Leonard
City of Rancho Cucannnga
9330 c Baseline Rd.
2utcho Cucamonga , CA 91730
DL•:ur David:
7 sevn54
Tx 141 E"!
(M) SfbEOT]
INUUSTRIAL
:e are pioased to offer you the following quotation on a new Roseman Hydraulic
1 lknv(,r. The detailed cost breakdown of this unit is as follows:
Q11' MODEL DESCRIMON
PRICE
1 1100-7 Rosaren 7 Gang Hydraulic Power $ 37,918.00
driven me wer
- CA253C Ford Diesel 59.5 hp
Tractor
-8 Speed Transmission
- LIve 540 P.T.O.
-Power Steering
- Differential Lock
-Roll Bar with Sum Canopy
-Anti -slip Kit
- Hydraulic Oil Cooler
-6 Bladed Reels
-Turf Tires
-Disc Brakes
i,esv Special Discount
�� (.'.7 ^3.00)
Subtotal ' -\
^ 43,125.00
Plus Sales Taw
2047.50
Total
$ 36,172750
Prucns good for (30) days
Thi:+ unit nm he leCied at $1221.73* per month for 36 myths. The first and
In:;t mmlhn pmmni L; are required to open the leaso, :md the unit my be purchased
at nd for 15S', of tho original invioce or96125.87.
* ILU.es wbp,ct tndaily inte'st change;.
Thin; unit tarries a full one(1) year warranty on the Tractor and ninet }'(90)
day;; m Iho mm(,r unit..
1�
•
This unit is avail =h'_c ! our San Diego stock which includes a full service
• shop .und service parts inventory.
We 'n):mk You for the opportunity to quote you on your equipnent requirement
and 1")k- forward to continued service of your account,
Xnr,,.Jnke,Inc.
LT /RC
r1
•
1M0000 RydrOR Power orlven Reel Mower
MODEL HGO -7
•
Complete
Factory
Installed
On
Ford
O.E.M.
Tractor
The Roseman 7 unit Hydra -Gang Mower utilizes the tractor•
power take -off system to power the cutting reels and the
tractor hydraulic system to provide hydraulic lift for each
mower unit Drive power for reels taken directly from the
tractor engine eliminates need for excessive draw Dar pull and
minimum weight for traction. Hills and hanks can be mowed
easily regardless of soft or wet turf conditions. Individual
mower units fnllow ground contour with unlimited flexibility
without scalping Cutting height 1s gauged by ground refer-
ence to provide even cut over undulations. 30" pet unit, Cut-
ting swath varies for 3. C, 5 and 6 mowers with maximum of
15 for 7 gang, Mowing time Is greatly reduced with a mini.
mum of repair maintenance. AN hydraulic components are
manulactured to ASAE standards. The complete mower and
linkage assembly can be removed from the tractor permitting
general use of the 3 -point utility features of the tractor,
TOP PERFORMANCE OMO[R NILLY CONDITIONS
SPECIFICATIONS • Roseman Mower Model HGO.7 A Ford G.E.M. Hydra-Gang Tractor
NORSEPOW SH
COLD STARTING AIDS
DIFFERENTIAL LOCK
HYDRAULIC PUMPS
. a• P
, r 11
n,...,r Tnn.mn1 11
A Jin,.r. , ai lick a.,Wd
Mnnrr On,r S,Irm 15 0 GPM
E NG1Nr DIESEL STA NOARO
CAPACITIES
n rr q•in (oor p..;ann!rs
MOwnr I d; SYAem .5 GPM
nri ^n', rr: 'a
Cnnerp �y.rem 105 quanv
�mnrr.n ar'rtingrmnr ann poll
POxn•Slnennq SVTtem Rra GPM
Lnv S •rn 0.rnTn q r
n,
rwn tarn qUS "'I. a
x Oprs pvn
[JOINT LINKAGE
Eq r..na +rra.n 69
MOLL OVER PROTECTION
51s1darJ Category i-
nl
DIMENSIONS
Hnii oar 1 a¢al pen , Anti Si,, Mn
Dr.', and PgSn•nP COrnrol
rL'
Ir•.,.x Orrrall 1:�
Slamle•d
Dual TOO Lmk Drall Senslnq
,,
COr,;i.,...armudn
r,.r
Hn r;m int nr i..._,,1 +
TRANSMISSION
STEERING
r,,11.1 -•r,i i..,•
pM,
w.rr�pase 1•• fl
MPH
flSUenn>Hnw,1
nq.ea Assist tit= wmg SlOpta $lop
An ru"' lrnr
HAn
aRAR[S
reran rat 1 0;'d3J
Ld ]fi
�61wm
rLECT
11
r r r ai
mnrn. Nn.wq nr sn,• r
I 58 61117
0 `11 fiA )1nnE R
rl
wEW, TId
[LfCTRIGAI
....
a ✓n.nq rsous
I 1 2
Bm:li Ui r -;x n]Sa
a 2 0
MOmnmE
iraztpr and MOwR•s 600
Vne1;r
12
Turm -q naauaw Prakns nA
POWER TAKEOFF
H Amp H,
1)fl
TIRES
1. 1 PuM •An ...
I
Aar•- .dYCap <•na
32
F,lSb•marn1n.1;6111,
17,rrIPM 1600 am
C.R. )AESLHKEINC..
i-h +lane•
51a,d.m
IT.,, ean.J T,eae 199.;.
Dry D. :r Cimcn 11ea.y owy
POWER EQUIPR i
regllli
s1anO.,d
ePryH.
ram Du
hi r1i FY n9nut
SIN DIEGO, CA, 93123
1'S E;
•
TORO DYOFOU C PON DPlaee Dee! MOR
MODEL HGO -7
. Heavy duly 30' mower. Ypoinl suspension with two cast.,
b wheels in oot and ear roller allows mower unit to follow
,round contrur wrin unlimiled Bedbilily without scalping• AN
seven units are mtrmhangeable. Shock resislanl hand adjust-
ment
All •oven units kin surd or lowered by hydraulic pewee When
raninq m r liml sarr.ty valves a homaucauy stop the hy-
draulm t mow rats on an win, units. A smog lever valve
c mlola •mil, In ran s n mowers allows onerater to var•I
rrnl speed as well as stopping and reversing reels. C.ni
Ni to 6' tramped width.
�Y
Tr i' Diameter
b ur a oe, for i mews, Gut
4 Ethan e for Rough he
Bath He dofreel.Int have aplirroa InaMf pfrmihirq hydraulic
motor la drive from eriher and.
7 Unit Hydra -Gang designed for use on Ford. Massey.
Ferguson and John Oeare tractors equipped won 169 x 24
It,lmmr ml turf tread rear fire Love 540 PTO is recom
mended Roll bar can be fired to tractor
Hydra Mower offers a light weight unit reducing com-
paction on your turf. Perfection in mowing under vret
conditions can now be accomplished. Exceptional trac-
tion on hills, Reels in all units can be reversed for easy
back lapping in less than an hour.
SPECIFICATIONS
HEIGHT OF CUT
" to a'.- in any dashed inc named 6' front caster
wheels' 1 10 2 B' front Caster wne:'s I'.'to 3'.
Culling height is gauged by ground reference to prcide
even cut over undulations
WIDTH OF CUT
30" per unit Culling swath varies for a. 4, 5 and 6 mow-
ers with ma I mum of 15 In, 7 gang.
TRANSPORT WIDTH
From operator's pos hi all mowers are quickly raised
and locked Into 8' Iranspmt widP.. Oserall length 12'.
TRANSPORT CONTROL
Five comrCl levers raise or lower number 4, 5. 6 or 7
units mdividually and the bee cer'er units Ym.:a-
neousfy.
REEL
71 ' Brame to 4.6 or 6 blade Heavy defy alloy Hardness
range 4042 Rockwell C scale Vertical thatching mowers a•e
urenchangealre with mowing urols
REEL POWER
Each reel mounted direclly to individual hydraulic mo-
tors No creches of Vm,emi56ion elements L'i.e 540
P T 0. power to all reels though a single handle control
valve.
POWER SHARPENING
Back lapping accomplished quickly by reversal of co'I-
lml valve hand'.e. Blades maintained in sharpest condo
hens wnbout removal of mower units
BEARINGS
Ant, friction noel and'ellar bearings.
MOWER FRAME
All steel .,ewer frame electrically welded for m r—um
sDennlh and rnnd.:y
BED KNIFE
01 lianlrwd lighi alley stmt L lyer cdoe Hsrdness
mega :7 -4g Rnt-li C Mle
ADJUSTMENT 1
Hand adprshrenl Nn loots needed Shock resistant
spnrg -type to prevent rr:el damage
CASTER WHEELS
Monidod tubber 6' or 8" career.
Mmulacturad by
ROSEMAN MOWER
CORPORATION
2300 CHESTNUT ST. Phone: 13121779 2300
Cl ENVIr1. ".11 I.INnICen079
a
401 D TRACTOR
� ,�, • �-„ ' JOHN OEERE
0.
Nii i
Model shown may include options
ENGINE PERFORMANCE
i
tv,•n '.rr r' nv
FEAT ORES
62 SAE net hp (06.21
Low center of gravity (turf tractorl
Adjustable rear treed
&eased transmission wlophonal
hydraulic direction reverser
Selladjuabng wet -disk brakes
Inboard planetary final drives
Optional loot-operated differential
lock
Hydrostatic power &testing
Two post Roll-Gard' roll-over protective
avucture (ROPS)
ADD VERSATILITY WITH:
Mowers
Landscapetoola
•
lm.nu&e u1e. 2.401 D-f
Opt.... V E9u,Pmrm
401D TRACTOR SPECIFICATIONS
Ir.,,•r.rr." r „.'., .,.. :1ar 22e m.'
nn: knu aarm
rav
Wpw.r ir' tarp �rW. rue MMmr m .helurs
ue n n —I.-. -, ICEe and SAE SuWrES ERmr • • onr..nm --ra 'Yu
'd ."'nalnn
cad hm sladmgaid
.a.urn aav n•.•r.n.v ;m:wef wnuG3, evn reviver I,.(Or!4re -1
ire.,tun Wnru nS:o I of g11 a.V S.mm.a
Mwp enrI
•
Power 1^ :530"ns" roll SAE DIN
Tires: Front
Rear
mq,w.•rnr ndn.•I vandal r rnnr
, 01,1
Gros-, 65 hp (49 kW)
75080DI6.6PR, F3 standard
149.24, 6PR,R4 standard
5. o
Nuwrr, 5 .r in II 11 52 ur
M
Nvt 62hp146.2kW) 66f1p149kW)
29 98 15,6PR,if 1)
16924. 6 PR. 93
sw Gtr()11111Mar
., rn4re� wee .•n 1a� wr �...,., .a1n pmt
C.ma `ro.v. rs wamr rn,
Tnr it 0•
16,924, 8 PR R4
21 5L -16 1, 6 PR. P3
3 in I )f mmi seal I it
�ou.�
Sear dr111r0 I.”, •won
`.w - ,. . nr':,•e :era'..., u' -.. mm wq -�.e,
Meet Treada:
,•., J.L. ,..,, ' -- ;. -,...
Front. ...
_. 541, 1135 m1
Rea!
..... 60 rn (1 50 m)
Engine: Jon^ 2"114 cluotler c 1, valve ...head. 4- stroke cycle
Bore and vq..; 4(1 1102- I10mm)
Dimensions:
Pha:oo d• LIa.n.rnl 2:9cu m 13589E
C.nrr,"on als 1621.1
Overall height to top of muffler
SX Bm (2 15 m1
61n.evarr' -^ : 1100 rpm 16f) 11 (21P Nor) (22 1 kg'ml
"'
Overall height to top of canopy
. ] X 91c 12 33 m)
W.CG n 1kA U. < *aal Mrsepower .. .. 2565
Overall width
0rn, (i...
B ft. 3m. it 901)
Na n Crnr 5
length ..a.
Overall length . .tch .,...,.,
....1011 Sln (350 m)
l w LRer
Pressure system
Overall length w &point latch .........
... lift 71n (3 55 ml
d offalOw
Coon.; f %essunied winertnostat antl feed bypass
Wheelbase. .. .....
.. .621 i
Far pop
Ground clearance lender IrMI Gale)
Or
........ 1 X. ] In (400 mmi
Au drao,., pry
a
Ground clearance. rtxn. .,....,,
12 rn. 1305 mini
FrrL;rca s, ^r -. 12 vet w alternator
C Paddies:
U.S. Liters
6a .' 1 7:1 s Reserve capacity Ito minutes
°,an i' mp
AllnrTrn .35 amps
eLla eVatem .......
129E 114
Fuel
195gal 738
Engine Clulcfl:
Engmelu6ncaond mcNdmg Liter
BS
c.,�on 15tandartll (2001- operated.
Ira ^smies'on and bydraubc system
.. . 10 gal 3'1.9
0g
ygle I in (260 cirri
Hvaeu' c c recso^ reverses f0riuoneil FooroPeraled.
SAE Operating Wel ..,... ..,..,
9 9111
51201b (2322kg)
Single loin 1255 mmi plate
Additional Standard Equipment
Ti ansllssmn Crns!anl mesh 8 forward speeds, 8 reverse.
An cleaner restncimn indicator
gear and s1.0, 9 oella•s mechan¢al shuttle Optional
Mercado, charge ,ndrcatm light
'averse. provides 6 spends lomard arld 6 re
Antifreeze
v1 ,,,o ncl cEt cles, no uutching requaed
Cushioned seal
Coolant lamperatere gauge
Travel Speedo
Dry-IVpe air cleaner
Forward Revere
Engine oil pressure loco for
Grar mph kmlh mph pri
right
•
14 23 16 26
Fenders
20 32 23 37
Fuel level gauge
3 29 A 34 55
Hanoi tool operated engine
4 4 1 66 4 ) 6
speed control
54 8 62 100
Horn
] ] 124 69 143
Key Start switch
114 163 132 212
Lost,
159 256 185 298
MuXler, under hood vs verecal
eahaost
H,d,au l i c S ys to an 7,'.nx'd4 enter
Rear reflectors
R,° 13 grim r0 82 L m r: 2500 engine rpm
Tachometer hewmeter
Transisloozed voltaile regulator
Final Drives InO.ard. planetary
Two-part Rall -Gard wseal bell
No d0d meal lock
Drakes H;d•auucally actuated. Ltlly enclosed wet disk
No paring brake
Sir r ^pea¢ ^p Ic..lrpr...led odrvi'u,llly.1 SnnUllanPW51y
No PTO
Noroekshah
$leering. H, "r",t,MC how,
No 3 pool i
I u'; ;ranrr:. h.ar'r•en0eedi 1211 9,, (3 90 m)
No remote cylinder control
twin " - rr, da
111; in, 260 6,n 181011
r 1 x.e In tar ru;ro 28
',,r i.... in lest ieh 23
Opt.... V E9u,Pmrm
Speual E,opi nP.
Ir.,,•r.rr." r „.'., .,.. :1ar 22e m.'
nn: knu aarm
rav
C
u.l •arid
'd ."'nalnn
cad hm sladmgaid
HV'tmie¢Ir n vcrJV
Fn9mr v,tndal sd s
Vita nij,I 1 S1 o rrin ',a' 1000
a nd mfillo,
thin m rl
"a fill
and wain,, cysl,m
mq,w.•rnr ndn.•I vandal r rnnr
, 01,1
P,n l
tl nne,unu'r ur nrrlrnrndenl
(,
—, S.0 rpm
5. o
Nuwrr, 5 .r in II 11 52 ur
M
fir, Vl'o .. r;n ,trot lrnglO Or
161 n119rdr'm<)llnll'r)
rI'rIL,, I'll nr5
i,=
sw Gtr()11111Mar
'didriest
n .)r n' 3 U'ant Iii ch
Tnr it 0•
C e'rq'uy 2 up:ng, non
3 in I )f mmi seal I it
nia,uo., v 11,o'1 draft links
Sear dr111r0 I.”, •won
2 4oro 2
r% LOSe.flo
(E.. }I I.,
III
1 awrrts
• •
7 -02"II I g Hy almulic rower ME Bull mower
the Roseman 7 mll HVdfa Gana Mnwm,
at': Ine I11 =1 rywer lake III :VSlnm In
ppwnr Vie Cllt!Inq Ile 'S Nnt1 me 11.111c, M1�tlla4'IC
SV'J em 0 nrovina nytl4rvxc ��1 to, ll mower
Unit Tne Hvdfa-G ang mouma on Ford,
lkfaasev, Fnmlr..n and Jon. Deere I1ac1n15
Drive rower for mnln lanrn cl from inn
tract., 111,ne Clim'nwe5 rmad for e; YCC5�I1C
(t r.lW !lar 1.1111 .1,111 nlmem wennt Inr Irrn,no,
Hme d Id bm3ks c,l. 1.e o wnd frilly reoenl
nl xnli or wel 1 I pIDbL.nS InUind,ml
m:nvnl of T; fn3.w amun,l cownw won onnm
Ile, tl.nP'. or wlt .... I 1ralpma C,exnn nn q4l l•.
1111.:1.1. oV nrountl rnbrnnce 1. VIlIde even
cm 1.111 Unll I.at 11 00 I,nr um, Cwt n n twatn
Vane <for ;3 a. 5a n C, mowers wqn maw,mOm 01
15 Inr 7 �,I11 t ldnw"a time IS OrCalry ad cod
rV a'1 .l mm -I'm r,l 11.11! m.,, rennancC All 1.y'
W . Oe..""11S :I1- manufan.n,1 w ASAF.
5I.Inr:.lo, Toe (:nTnICIe '.'w" antl ink,ln9
,1.,.,,,rnnly f nTOVn<I Ifni ten 1f,9CI0f
b0 r
In ^r 111 :1 r.' pal USe 1.1 InUa l%rmf uld�ty lra
From operalnrb Pa slllon all mowcra am quickly raised to 13' ❑1.w of Inlr oa -m1
trans part width. C.R. JAESCHKE INC..TOP PERFORMANCE IINOFR
POWER EQUIP FNT HILLY CONDITIONS
8921 COMPLEX DRIVE
.. .. SAN CIECO, CA. 9.74
(71.1
9
•
TOM Hygrouiic
Power ONE
MODEL HG -7
Hrav, day 20" mews, Ypoinl ...pension with Iwo outer
Wont and r roller allows mower unit to follow
n n TUnd on our loin, onM1mrted Prin illy wnhoul scalping. All
spvvn units are Interchangeable, Shack resistant hand adlusl-
,in,
All srv" n urns are raped nr lowered by hydraulic power. When
in11 mr.. r stn .rlvl, valves nmomab<allr can the hy-
drauV.r dr, % to rrrts on all wine units. A stools Inver valve
rnlrob rrrn n all v enowv narrator to vary
rrl :pruil .1 rJ a Hopp ng and re alit., teen. Oulckly
ra�sl s to ¢'trampr�n wimp.
Phil
7'1' Olamel'r
841110+ for nelornq It'll, A Oermuda grass
6 nr 4 Blade nor nor nrr rn mg n'mhb
.....,p.l a
iron.r+.vv.J'v4g m,e,•ir• end•:••'•.•.. •. .' a
maim IO Nlvf nn
ROOM mower t
7 Unit Hydra-Gang Lessened lot use on Ford, Massey.
Ferguson and John Deere Iranians ectioned wlih 16.9 . 24
(Maximum) turf tread rear lire. Live 540 P,T,O. Is reocm-
mended Felt bar can be fitted to tractor.
Hydra Mower oilers a light weight unit reducing com-
paction on your turf. Ferfechan in mowing under wet
conditions can nov: De accomphsrm L. Exee ollonal trac-
tion on hills. Peels in all units can be reversed for eaay
back lapping in less than an hour.
SPECIFICATIONS
HEIGHT OF CUT
wIo 3'.'.- in any desired Indremeol. 6' front car!,,
heels '',' 1. 2l:'; a" front caster wheels 1L"Ig
Culim,g height as ;:.:bad by cmund relerence to orc,de
even cut over updulatmns,
WIDTH OF CUT
30" per unit Cutting swath vanes for 3. 4. 5 and 6 now•
ers with maarmum of 1 Y for 7 gang.
TRANSPORT WIDTH
From operators ros :liar, ail mowers are apick'!y raced
and Jn,tld I, ^..P B IIanSPdlt width, 01WI length 12',
TRANSPORT CONTROL
Fis cannrnl levers rase or lower number 4. 5. 6 ar 7
umis nlalvld L'd ly and the mire C?nte, ur.vs s,, ta.
neousl y.
REEL
71)- [)'apps, N,m.^-r OI BIA LeS and :Oval Heavy duty a',av
Hind... r, r 0
a 442 R,,nvell C scale Vabical thr -, -g
native, aralinincrninaeable in nlowine umis
HEELPOWER
Each reel mounted directly to in ,idual hydraulic To-
tors No clutc,r- or tbr,arasm•I elrm¢ms Live 5:0
P O. ^„owe, U an rows thraug't a s ogle handle cpnlml
vahe.
POWER SHARPENING
Hach lapmr7 ^ rind n,, ally by re anal of cam
Vor vahe e, e'nd's mxmlamed is hr,,ent ccnde
bons wuh—i removal of mower unes
BEARINGS
Anil find nn all and •oiler bearings.
MOWER FRAME
All sireI inew., frame alecu."lly welded lot mapm.m
slrenn!n.md r:'laar.
BED KNIFE
00 rfi.• Ind.... ai all, •dial. 1r6lvra ednn Hart ^use
,a-,. a7.a an nef kwnll C •.cola,
ADJUSTMENT
H,,d NO Inplt dried `ihoek .e5irt,l nl
at,J•Imr• ^I
s Plirg.lyrr In plevt'nl real damage.
CASTER WHEELS
Mpoldcd rubber 6' or 8' diameler.
IT
11
I
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CuCA V0 Y
STAFF REPORT
2 `r A �
1- iZ
Septemer 7, 1983
19 -7
City Council and City Manager
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
Micnael D. Long, Assessment District 82 -1 Resident Engineer
Acceptance of Improvements Constructed in Conjunction with
Assessment District 82 -1, 6th Street Industrial Area
Whereas, improvements have been constructed substantially in conformance to
the requirements of the contract documents for Assessment District 82 -1, 6th
Street Industrial Area, and whereas inspection of said immprovements have
found that they substantially conform to said contract and to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer, the improvements can be arcepted into the City
maintained system.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council accept the improvements for Assessment
District 82 -1, 6th Street Industrial Area and authorize the City Engineer to
file a Notice of Completion and release performance bonds and retention and
authorize final payment.
Respectfully submitted,
LBI:MDL:jaa
Attachments
• RESOLUTION NO. *V? — i'r ',I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1, 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Assessment
District 82 -1, 6th Street Industrial Area have been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and I
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City C er
/Jaa
19
Jon D. Mike s, Mayor
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF PANC40 CUCAV4GA
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91710
MH EN RECOxi MAIL TO:
CITY CLEPK
CITY OF RANCHO ',UCAMONGA
Post office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in tee
hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate
is:
ASSESSMENT DIST9IC.T 82.1
6TH STREET INOu STAIAL AREA
• 2, The full name and address of the undersigned owner ie CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO�:GA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Bas n07, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 7th day of Seotemher, 1983, there was co^oloted on the
hereinafter descrihed real pr00,rty the work of improv =ment se: `orth In the
contract documents for:
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1
6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA
4. The name of the original contractor for the work of impn,venent
as a wholr, was:
BONAOIMAN- MCCAIN, INC.
5. The real property reftrred to herein is situated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as
follows:
Sturm Aram lines numbered Sd -I, 51-2, 7e, 19a, 19d and 19f, 6th Street
bntwoen Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue, 6th Street from SIR 6500 to
Rorhestnr 4Ye11e, Buffalo Avenn+ mouth of Gth Street. The west sign of
M,lllkrn Avenue ..On of Gth itreet.
Clwollc; avenue snulh of 6'h Strent and Rochester Avenue hntwnen fith Street
and iii Avelun.
CITY nc PA9C1n C'L,INGA. T
Tlln ll 1pd: .1'p'1f Al.'t , 'ln nor
gal
ion N,karS, Zld ydY l
W'.�
- - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cuca,tr0
STAFF REPORT
x
7DATE:Septembe,,r 7, 19831977 cil and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Vineyard Avenue Street Improvements, FAU No. M /MR-
R194(2)
The Vineyard Avenue Street, Drainage and Signal Improvement Project has been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that
the Council approve the acceptance of the project, authorize the final payment
and direct the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder and release performance surety and retention.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Vineyard Avenue Street,
• Drainage and Signal Improvements, FAU No. M /MR- R194(2) and pass the attached
resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and
release performance bonds and retention and authorize final payment.
Respectfully subpitted,
L6(4: jaa
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IM ^ROVEMENTS
FOR VINEYARD AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FAU PROJECT NO,
M /MR- R194(2) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Vineyard Avenue
between 8th Street and Arrow Highway have been completed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NO'd, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1993.
AYES:
NOES:
49 ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, Ci ti y Cierk
/iaa
I
Mikels, Mayor
Pi
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Past Office 30N 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Boa 807
Rancho Cut among a, Cal Nornia 91730
NOTICE OF COMPLETITi
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned Is an owner of an interest or estate in the
hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate
is:
STREET IMPROVEMENTS, DRAINAGE AND SIGNAL FACILITIES
2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9720 -C Base Line Road, Post Office 80a 307, Rana40
• Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 7th day of September, 1993, there was comoleted on the
hereinafter described real property the work of Improvement set forth in the
contract decments for:
VINEYARD AVEN'C STREET IMPPOVCatNTS FAU RROdELT NO. M /4R- R194(2)
4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement
as a whole was:
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
S. The real property referred to herein Is situated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as
follows:
Vineyard Avenue between Bth Street and Arrow Highway
CITY OF RW'fi) CUCA"ONGA, a
municipal cOrpo,atide, Owner
Daln;
Tn M1'v rTt, Mayor
L I
•
•
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: City Council and -City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Alta Loma Park Concrete Improvements
ttiUM0,1r,
T i,l A
~ v >
I9Ff
The Alta Loma Park Concrete and Drainage Improvement Project has been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that
the Council approve the acceptance of the project, authorize the final payment
and direct the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder and release performance surety and retention.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Alta Loma Park Concrete
Improvements and pass the attached resolution authorizing the City Engineer to
file the Notice of Completion and release performance bonds and retention and
authorize final payment.
tfully submitted,
LB11:MP:jas
Attachments
r .�
• RESOLUTION NO. *'('''�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR ALTA LOMA PARK CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Alta Loma Park
Concrete Improvement have been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSENT:
Jon D. Mike s, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M, Wasserman, City Clerk
/jaa
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box 807
Rancbo Cucamonga, California 91730
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box B07
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1, The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the
hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate
Is:
PARK CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AND ORAINAGE FACILITIES
2. The Poll name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Be% 807, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730,
3. On the 7th day of September, 1903, there was cowyleted on the
hereinafter described real property the work of rmpr" went set forth in the
Contract documents for:
ALTA COMA PARK RENOVATION
a. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement
as a whole was:
d. N. CONCRETE
5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and Is described as
follows:
West side of Beryl Street, north of 19th Street
CITY Oc RANCHO 'IICAH ^NGA, a
municipal caroorntvn, gwner
Pate
__.
Inn MiauT7, en vor __
u
0
r1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager 197
FROM: Lloyd B. Butts, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Agreement for Ninth Street Improvements in conjunction with Tract
9658
The development of Tract 9658, on the north side of 9th Street between Madrone
and Baker Avenues, resulted in numerous utility trenches across 9th Street
which would have greatly reduced the riding quality of 9th Street and caused
severe maintenance problems in the near future. The developer was required
only to improve the north side of 9th Street, as is the normal practice on
such a project.
it became evident that, since this portion of 9th Street was budgeted for
improvement in the coming year, it would be of benefit to the City to
participate in the reconstruction of 9th Street in its entirety through the
limits of the project at this time. In so doing, a savings would be realized
in design and construction costs, inconvenience to the public reduced and a
street improvement obtained at an earlier date. The coordination also results
in a better street design through this portion.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached agreement with
Richwood Development for participation in the reconstruction of 9th Street
between Madrone and Baker Avenues and authorize the payment of $19,637.00 from
Systems Development funds.
pectfully sutyn itted,A
/ �x
RPAR:jaa
Attachment
4.
• AGREEMENT
FOR
NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
IN
CONJUNCTION WITH TRACT 9658
This Agreement is made and entered into this day
of ,1983 by and between Richwood Development, (DEVELOPER),
and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, (CITY).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the CITY and DEVELOPER desire to mutually participate in the
construction of Ninth Street Improvements between Baker Avenue and Madrone
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER has expressed its willingness to include said
construction with improvements for Tract 9658.
•NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The DEVELOPER shall contract for the construction of Ninth Street
19
from Bake: Avenue to east of Madrone Avenue, said improvements as further
described in City of Rancho Cucamonga Drawing Nos. 775.
2, The CITY agrees to share in the cost of improvements constructed
south of the centerline of Ninth Street in the quantities described in the
attached Exhibit "A ". Total amount being a lump sum of
3. The CITY agrees to pay funds to the DEVELOPER in the amount of
said share within thirty (30) days of completion and acceptance by the CITY.
4, Each party shall indemnify the other parties and its officers,
agents and employees against and hold them free and harmless of an from al'
.I-
"I
C r•
claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or •
resulting from, acts of omissions on its part or on the part of its officers,
agents, contractors and employees in connection with the construction.
5. This Agreement may only be changed with the mutual consent of the
parties in the form of written contract amendments.
6. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein are dt
all subject to a successful completion of construction of improvements.
IN WITENESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as the
date first above written.
ATTEST:
Laren Wasserman, City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal
corporation
by •
Jon Mikels, Mayor
RICHWOOD DEVELOPMENT, Developer
by
2-
7 �
•
-1 .
luj
•
9
1. Grading & Removals
2. A. C. Paving
3. 811 A. C. Berm
4. A. C. Drive Approaches
E X H I B I T A
L.S.
320.10 tons @ $26.50 /ton
864 L.F. @ $2.50 /ton
2197 S.F. @ $0.55 /S.F.
LUMP SUM TOTAL CITY SHARE
3-
$5,000.00
$8;482.00
$2,160.00
$3,995.00
$19,637.00
i i • Y'
ti
LJ
-_j
I
I
-.� -�
•
NORTI i
CITY O rrr..I -- 1l_ -L fs
R'ANCIIO CUCAMOV;A T,rl,i�;- -LACA^fl& M�LP 0
ENGINEERING DIVISION P.XIIIRIT`___-SCALG fflw�
y rl
•
I
- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C\2CA.tl0
STAFF REPORT .// �
C L C
DATE; September 1, 1983 3r z
IG
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: flnyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: ,john Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Model Homes for Tentative
Tract 12316 -1 (Terra Vista), Lewis Homes Developer located on the
east side of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road
The subject developer has requested permission to construct model homes on the
site location being on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road.
The securities offered for guarantee of street construction are as follows:
Faithful Performance Bond: $56,100.00
Labor and Material Bond: S28,050.00
RECaMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution
authorizing the Mayor to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
LBHWM:Jaa
Attachments
AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN /
:
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12316 &12316 -1 i�i�l I
1 n
P I
:
M.W. .Y. N.
7�
..., II
I I TE 14E ..,
� Ne'IYJP —� {
t fit. I
r.
jI N
y " It - .... 2�—�II/ �y -• fl.�' �� 1 �'�r If t~ �� P P•9 L " " ",� f
• RESOLUTION NO. *Y'; -I S' '
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT NO. 12316 -1
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12316 -1, consisting of 37
lots, submitted by Lewis Homes, Subdivider, located on the east side of Haven
Avenue, south of Base Line Road, was tentatively approved by the Planning
Commisson on May 25, 1983 by Resolution No. 83 -69; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the construction of model homes on said Tract said Subdivider has
offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and
execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement
Security, fa, of model homes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same
on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
• 2, That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
/jaa
Jon . Mike s, ayor
3. The Developer may request an extension of tine to
complete the rms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to
the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration
date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances
necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the
right to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the
construction standards, cost estimate, and Improvement secer.ty,
and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has
occurred during the term hereof.
e, if the Developer fails or neglects to comply with
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right
at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful
meant, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety
the full cost and ex, nse incurred.
S. The Developer shall provide metered water setill— to
earn lot of said development in accord once with the renulati.,, ,
schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water Dislri -tt,
6. The ',eloper snail be resoontiblo for repiacer-oei
relocation, or rrmoval of any (inch n r nt of any irlIgalire aatcr
systnm in conflict wile of required improv,ents to
the satisl action of the City Engineer and the o.nrr of such wa ;er
system.
u
-� Tracts and Comm /Ina,, P.M.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR
TRACT 12316.1 MODEL SITE ONLY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is
made and entered into, in coffer man r.a with the VIe1111.eS of the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the
appih.able Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City,
hereinafter referred to as the City, and Lewis Homes of Coliforvaa
ea einatter re /erred to as the
Developer.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain
real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved
subdivision known as Tract 12316 -1 (Model Site Crly) ; and
WHEREAS, said City has estabiished certain recoirenents
to be met by said Oevelaper as prerequisite to approval of said
subdivision generally located at Terra Vista southerly of Baseline
Road
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ag,eed by said City and by
said Developer as follows:
1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at
Developer's expense all imorove -ants described on Page 6 here-
of within twelve months from the effective date hereof.
•
2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of tha
resolution of the Council of said City app(Oei ng this
agreement. This agreement shell be in default on the day follnw-
ing the first anniversary date of said aoprovai unless an exten-
sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid-
ed.
3. The Developer may request an extension of tine to
complete the rms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to
the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration
date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances
necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the
right to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the
construction standards, cost estimate, and Improvement secer.ty,
and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has
occurred during the term hereof.
e, if the Developer fails or neglects to comply with
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right
at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful
meant, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety
the full cost and ex, nse incurred.
S. The Developer shall provide metered water setill— to
earn lot of said development in accord once with the renulati.,, ,
schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water Dislri -tt,
6. The ',eloper snail be resoontiblo for repiacer-oei
relocation, or rrmoval of any (inch n r nt of any irlIgalire aatcr
systnm in conflict wile of required improv,ents to
the satisl action of the City Engineer and the o.nrr of such wa ;er
system.
u
-� Tracts and Comm /Ina,, P.M.
0
7. Improvements rCO.n r_d to be constructed shall
conform to the Standard Draw t ngs and Standard Specifications of
the City, and to the Improvement Plan I 11 o v•d by and on file in
the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements +. a tabulated
on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on
page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon
by number. The Developer shall also be respunsIb le for construc-
tion of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract
boundaries as needed for safety and proper Surface drill name.
Errors or emaiissions discovered our Ing ronstructln shall be
corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer, Revised work
due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions
of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original
planned works.
a. Construction permits shall be obtained by the
Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start +f
work; ail regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with
attention giYen to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or
other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public
at i l t ties and City Departments. Failure tt comply 'It' this
section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of
all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within
or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to
said development.
10. Work done within existing streets shall be
diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have toe ngnt
to complete any and all work in the a °ent or unjustified delay in
compietio n, end to recover all cost and expense incurred from the
Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means.
11. Said Developer shall at all times followinq dedica.
tion of the streets and easements in said subidivis ion, up to the
completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by Said
City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling
public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said
street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from
such defective or dannertnt conditions.
Until the completion of all improvements, herein incorporated on
Page 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as
improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said
Developer may close all or a portion of any Street subject to the
conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued
by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the
public during the r struction of the improvements herein ag,eed
to be made.
12. Parkway trees required to be planted Shall be
planted by the Developer after other improvement work, trading
and cleanup has heel completed. Plart inn Shall be done as
provided by Ordinance in accoroance with thn planting diagram
approved by the City Community Development Director,
The developer sno I be responsible for manitoining all trees
planted good he a l to unt 11 the end of thr guar art o•iu
maintenance period, or for one year after planting, no Ichever Is
at er,
13. The Develnper It re soon: i b l^ for n ^el l no all condi -
tions established by the City pursuant to the Sobdlvlslun
-2- •
n
u
Map Act, City Ordi ances, and this agreement for the development,
and for the maintenance of all improvements ca n st ruc ted
•`°- under until the improvement is accepted for nointenalce by
the City, and no improvement security provided here inwilh shall
be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and
authorized by the City Council of the City.
14. This agreement shall not terminate until the
maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been
released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the
reVutred improvement security has been submitted to the City by a
successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City
Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the
improvement security therefor has been released.
15. The improvement security to oe furnished by the
Developer with this agreement shall consist of the fol lowinn_ and
shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney:
D. The regu red bonds and the or h,ipal amounts
thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement.
16. The Developer
Oper warrants loaf the im p r ev t,rn is
described n this ague. A wail be free Iof eel imps e.
materials and workmanship. d,.!hip. Any and all port tons of ll improve.
dents found to be dr,!ectdin wllntn one (l) yrar following the
data which tiv imp. nvrmrnts are acc rpl rd by the charges shall be
repaired or replanmo by Dr vein env Irre of all cnargrs Ui the
City. Iln s1 v inorr wall to C1it a mn f .nonce guarantee
• iecunly in a sum equal to ten prrcrnt (!Oil o! thr cpntlruction
-1.
1
A.
To secure faithful performance of this agreement,
1. A bond or bonds by one or more duty authorized
corporate sureties i r the form and content
specified by Government Code Section 66499.1.
2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form
and content specified by the City Attorney,
3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable
bonds of the kind approved for securing
deposits of public monies.
B.
To secure laborers and materi aimen:
•
1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized
corporate sureties io the form and content
specified by Government Code Section 66499.1.
2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form
and content specified by the City Attorney,
3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable
bonds of the kind approved for securing
C.
A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment
by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose
certificate appears upon the Final Map for the
setting of all bounds. y, lot Qrre, - am: street
centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline
tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit
may be any amount certified by the engineer or
surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no
value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown
an the Construction and Bond Estimate contained
herein.
Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce.
dure permits after receipt by the City of the
center] the tie notes and written asld�llse of
payment in full from the engineer or surveyor.
D. The regu red bonds and the or h,ipal amounts
thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement.
16. The Developer
Oper warrants loaf the im p r ev t,rn is
described n this ague. A wail be free Iof eel imps e.
materials and workmanship. d,.!hip. Any and all port tons of ll improve.
dents found to be dr,!ectdin wllntn one (l) yrar following the
data which tiv imp. nvrmrnts are acc rpl rd by the charges shall be
repaired or replanmo by Dr vein env Irre of all cnargrs Ui the
City. Iln s1 v inorr wall to C1it a mn f .nonce guarantee
• iecunly in a sum equal to ten prrcrnt (!Oil o! thr cpntlruction
-1.
1
0
estimate or 5200,00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful
performance of Developer's ob Iigat tons as dtscr ibed in this para-
graph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the
faithful - performance by the Developer of any obligation of the
Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway
maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been
accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted
by the City, the other improvement security described in this
agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise
authorised by the subdivision Nap Act and any applicable City
Ordinance.
i7. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such
public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect
him and any contractor or subcontractor performino work covered
by this agreement from claims for property damages which may
arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under
this agreement, 'whether such operations be by himself or by any
contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly
employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused
by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or
subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public
liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as
additonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers,
agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors
and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued
hereunder shall so state, The minimum am o u his of such insurance
shall be is follows:
Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily
injury or death liability limits of not less tha
$300,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for each •
accident or occurrence, and property damage liabi 1.
ity limits of not less than $1i O,000 for each acci.
dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of
$250,000 for claims which may arise from the opera.
tions of the Developer in the performance of the
work herein provided,
Automobile liability insurance covering all
vehicles used in the performance of this agreement
providing hodi)y injury liability limits of not
less than 5200,000 for each person and $300,000 for
each accident or occurrence, and property damage
liability limits of not less than $50,000 for each
accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not
less than $100,000 which may ar t se from the opera.
tions of the Developer or his Contractor in
performing the work provided for herein.
10, That before the execution of this agreement, the
Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates
of insurance covering the spec if led insurance. Each such
certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the
cancel lat. ions, or reduction in coverage of any policy evidences
by such certificate, before the eapiret ion of thirty ( 30) days
after the City shall have received notification by req,slie,ed
mail from the insurance carrier.
As evidence of understanding the provi, ens r ntnined herein, and
of intent to comply with same, the $aihdivuler has suhmilted the
follpwuig described imprn vem not security, and has aff i cad his
signature hereto-
-a- •
•
D".--LC RE 131NSUPANCE COMPANY
PJ LL.( 3''
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE 3'3 vnlri,:
,..an_ .:. CLE FCOIIiA 92'_OI
Type:
Princips, Amount: 555,100
Name and
address of surety; OE'. -Lcli - i 11ISL'PAHCE CONIPANY
MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT
;331'�'C��E
N, E1Y CALiFO'r:IV, ?2F01
Type:
Principal Anuunt: 522,050
a Name and
address of surety:
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION
Type:
Principal Amount:
Name and
address of surety:
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE
Type:
Principal Amount:
Name and
address Of Surety:
TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents
to Be duly executed and acknowledged with all
formalities
required Dy law On the dates set Forth opposite their
•
signatures. /�
Date Auivat 1B. 1983 by Levis Y.ox of La li orn la , Dereloper
tgc t .A
I C
-nip --
Ba hard A.
Data
by ,Developer
Signature
Accepted:
City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Cal Hornig
A Municipal Corporation
By: Mayor
Attest;
IY }reek
Approved: �,j,r /%•
DI VFt OPIR'S SIGNATURE. MUST BE NOTANI110
-5.
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
For Improvement off Tract 12316 -1 Model Site Orly
0a te: Computed Dv:
File Referenc(: City Deg. No.
MOTE: Bones hot include current fee for
writing permit or Pavement denosits.
CONSTRUCTION COST EST! -ATE
ITEM _ OL'f.N—ITY JM1_ UNIT -CST S :. 7CVT
P.C.C. Curb - 12• C.F.
P.C.C. Curb - 8" C.F. 899 L. F. 6.00 5' -.4
P.C.C. Curb only 6- L.F.
A.C. Berm (520) min.) _
a• P.C.C. Sidewalk 4960 S.F. 1.75
6" Orive Approach 360 S.r. 2.50 1'
B" P.L.C. Cross Gutter e9. S.F. 3.3;1 3:33
Street Excavation
Imported Embankment
Preparation of Subgrade 31,045 S.F. 0.15 4657
Crushed Aggregate Base (per in. thick)
A.C. (over 1300 tons)
A.C. (900 to 1300 tons)
A.C. (Under 500 to 900 tons)
A.C. (under 500 tons) 416 S.F. 0.55 24.961
Patch A.C. (trench)
1' thick A,C. Overlay e •
Adst sewer manhole to grade
Adjuodst sever clean wt •p gradx
Adjust eater valves to grade
Street Sign, FA. Ic!.'.JO 31
Street Sign; 3 EA. I0J.J0 0,
Street frees
Parkway landscape and Irrigation
CO:STRUCTION COST
S51_049
_ J
CONTINGENCY COSTS
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION _
S56.154
FAIT4FUL PFRFORtlANC.E SURETY (IOUs)
LABOR AND MATERIAL crrnRJTY (50:)
EAGIhtERIN9 I16PECTI01+ FEE _
>_grr4.50
0ELIn[Al10Y l4S1i II Fn IT
Sdd,00
(RtFUNOmtLe1
MH)I+IIM;NTATION SURETY (CASU1
•Pu r,ud n to City of Ran, no Cneumnnga Min iI I I'd l C.n
in, Title 1,
C.hopler 1.07,
adoptmq San Urm,"hno Cnnnty Cede Tillrs,
Chaptrrs
1.5, a rash
rr{tnratlnrl /Irl irlr al inn rlrpn'.IL {hall bN In.lde
Or ter to issln
... cc Of An
Engineering Cvnstructl:m I'amit.
-h-
•
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
?OND NO.: 106373
PREMIUM : $337.00
WHEREAS, the City (oiOLil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State Of California, and txvs Nome, of eallfornla
(her eina /te^ designated as "p incinal" have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete
certain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated August 10 _, 198 3 , and identified as
project Tract 11)164 ~ei site ontyl is -Fer-eby referred to and
made a part nereo ;and,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a band for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and oevelmeer , X. m =-ar.
as surety, are held and firmly bound unto tee Cis —y oof ltancno
Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City"), in tM1e penal sum of
ftf: -six Tnouaam om Hwars9_61la6± a Un l te- ---- - - - - -- - - --- Dohs
66 too aX ui money Of the Unt tad e� the payment
of XM1 IJ Chi 5Vm —Xe)l and truly t0 be made, we bind ourselves, our
heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by,
and well and truly keep and Perform the covenants, conditions and
. provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made
as therein provided, _ their their part, to be kept and
performed at the time and in theM ; -.Ier therein specified, and in
all respects according to their true intent and meanine, and
shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and
employees, as therein Stipulated then this obligation shall
i
become null and void; otherwise, t shall be and remain in full
force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to
the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs
and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's
fees, incurred by City in sic ce ssiu l ty enforcing such obligation,
all to be taxed as costs and included im any ju�gment rendered,
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that n0 change,
•' eat On s l on of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
agreement Or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci -
fications accompanying the carne shall in an yXf se affect its
1 obligations on this bond, and it Aoes hereby waive notice of any
such change, e to n s on of time, alteration or addition t the
H terms of the agreement „r to the wort or to the specifications,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, In,s instrument has been duly executed by
thu Dr,nciVal and surety above named, on Ali_e le _
198
r;,,lif -"a DEV111,011ERS tNt;VRANCC C,IMPAAy ,
•r�i„��, i�iir el _ —rltm Day -in -f ACt
5tnpnen A. Spun nu!✓o
PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS
SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED
BOND NO.: 106373 -A
' PRMIUM : INCLUDED
LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND •
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and i.wis uo,ms of Californle
( ..ere, ha ter designated as ••p r n c p a l ^) nave entered into
agreement, whereby prints pal agrees to install and complete
c ert a In des i gn a: e public improvements, which sold agreement,
dated Avgyst 10 - 1983 , and identified
as protect _Tract 12316 -1 (model site ont9) hereby relCrred to and ^late
a part her eor; ana
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is
required before entering upon the performance of the work, to
file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made
Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division ?
of the Civil Code of the State of California.
NON, THEREFORE, said pr Inc i is al and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of RahCho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, labcrers,
materialnen and other persons employed in the performance of the
aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code
D 1V11 Procedure in the Sum of MntY -610ht 'nwveand Fifty collars a No loo
Dollars (S m.nse ). for matenais furnasned or labor thereon D'
any kind, or tar amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act
with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay t
same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set fort -.. e
and also in case suit is brought upon this Dona will pay :.n
addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable
expenses and fees, Including reasonable attorney's fees, incur ^e:
by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded
and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to
Included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond •
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, co-lanies and
corporations entitled to file Claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 3022) of Part 4 of Divison 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brought.upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation snail become null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no chance,
extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications acccapanying the same shall In
any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here-
;' by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or
addition.
IN 'WITNESS WHrh EOF, this instrunent has been duly executed by
the principal and surety above named, on AUMtt le ,
188 ,
LAai:ihm,•_ft_ Lifr�ria DEVa •Rc •c Oa PA NV
/ .pnie lo:w: isu r'ey
inr. ar nd % -lh.,. u
Authorsed Aneht Stephen A. Spoonlo
PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS •
SIBNATURLS MUST BE '10TARTILD
n
U
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
C,�'CA&10 '
�An
FI—
1977, 1
SUBJECT: Setting of Public Hearing for October 5, 1983 to form Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Map 7349 located on the north
side of 4th Street, east of Route 15 Freeway
Lewis Homes, developer of Parcel Map No. 7349, a general industrial
subdivision, has requested the City form an Assessment District for the
maintenance of landscaping, a detention basin and storm drain within their
project. These improvements will be installed by the developer.
The landscaped area on the westerly side of Hyssop (between Hyssop and the
Freeway), the temporary detention basin located on Parcel No. 8 and the storm
drain easement which provides the drainage of Hyssop Street south to the
detention basin will be maintained by the Assessment District.
Total annual maintenance cost is being estimated as follows:
Landscaping $0.30 x 6057 sq. ft. = S1,817.00
Detention Basin and Storm Drain $1 000.00
LUMP SUM = ,8 .00
Per Lot Annual Assessment S 352.14
Per Lot Monthly Assessment $ 29.35
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions, initiating
and forming Landscape Maintenance District No 3, approving the Engineer's
Report, and setting the date for Public Hearing for October 5, 1983.
Re ypectfully subpii tted,
Attachments
4.
•
r
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3,
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the
California Streets & Highways Code authorizes tl�,is City Council to initiate
proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and
maintain landscaping, basin and storm drain located therein; and
WHEREAS, this City Council desires to initiate proceedings for the
formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3" to improve and maintain landscaping, basin and storm drain to
be located within the boundaries of said landscape maintenance district.
NOW, THEREFORt, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby proposes the formation of an
assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3"
pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
• SECTION 2: The nature, location and extent of the improvements to be
ins* >>led and maintained within "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" are
more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
SECTION 3: The location and extent of Landscape District No. 3 is
more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated
herein, and this City Council hereby specifies the designation "Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3" for said landscape maintenance district.
SECTION 4: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to
cause the preparation and filing of a report with respect to the formation of
Landscape Maintenance District in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with
Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES: '
NOES:
ABSSC'J:
doh 0. MiTie�s,`ayor-
0 ATTEST:
Lauren asserman, t y Clerk'
t
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
• LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3
w � �
a _ _
_
CNGINFERING 1)1VISION
VICINITY NIAP page
Resolution Ho.
Page 3
EXHIBIT "B"
A portion of the west half of Lots 81 -88, inclusive, Map of Rochester as •
recorded in Boor. 9, Page 20, Records of San Bernardino County, State of
California.
u
rn
.�,
RESOLUTION NO. * -'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE
E.NGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3
WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the
California Streets and Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate
proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and
maintain landscaping, basin and storm drain located therein; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. * this City Council initiated
proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as
"Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" to improve and maintain landscaping,
basin and storm drain to be located in the boundaries of said Landscap-
Maintenance District and ordered the preparation and filing of a report in
accordance with Article 4 (co�ixrmncing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the
California Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council that certain
• "City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District
No. 3 and
WHEREAS, this City Council has duly considered said Engineer's Report
in each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said
Engineer's Report is adequate and sufficient and that said Report does not
require modification in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its preliminary approval
to the Engineer's Report referred to in the recitals hereinabove.
SECTION 2: Said Engineer's Report which is referred to in the
recitals hereinabove shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the
purposes of all subsequent proceedings in connection with the formation
" Landscape Maintenance District No. 311.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
0 ABSENT:
--ro n , idiom s, ayor
Resolution No.
Page 3
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
Original Formation
Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
September 7, 1983
0
•
•
Resolution No.
Page 4
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 40. 3
SECT101 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of
Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code,
State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The report deals with the establishment of Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Area to be included
in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the
repnrt and on the attached Assessment Diagram. The total area of
S34 d parkways being 6,057 square feet, and a detention basin located
on Parcel No. 8. Work to be provided for, with the assessments
established by *he District, are:
• The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operating and servicing of any parkway and detention
basin improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general
benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a
per Tot basis.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The plans and specifications for landscaping, detention basin and
storm drain are to he prepared by the developer. The plans are as
stipulated in the conditions of approval and as approved by the City
Engineer and City Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the
subject Parcel Map and the assessment diagram for the exact location
of the landscape area. The plans and specifications for landscape
improvements on the individual Parcels are hereby made a part of this
report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were
attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities include:
The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any
improvement, to include landscaping, detention basin and storm drain,
providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping,
including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or
treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish,
debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement
as necessary of all irrigation systems, and cleaning of drainage
inlet and outlet structures, pest control, debris removal, fence
repair and all associated work for the successful functioning of the
systems.
Resolution NO.
Page 5
•
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
No costs will be incurred for improvement construction. All
improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on data from
other cities, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is
estimated tha maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal
thirty cents ($.30) per square foot per year for parkway and a Lump
Sum $1000 annually for detention basin maintenance. These costs are
estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data.
The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
comprised of 8 lots and per lot costs are shown below:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost:
Landscaping 0.30 x 6057 $1817.10
Detention Basin - Lump Sum = 1000.00
and Storm Drain
TOTAL - $23I7T6
Per Lot Annual Assessment $2817 divided by 8 = $352.14
Per Lot Monthly Assessment = $M j.
Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the •
attached Assessment Diagram.
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed Assessment diagram is attached to this report
and labeled "Exhibit A ".
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
improvement for the entire district is found to be of general benefit
to all lots within the District and that assessment. shall be equal
for each parcel.
SECTION 7. ORDER OF EVENTS
1. City Council approves institution of District proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City
Engieer's report.
3, City Council adepts Resolution of intention to form a District and
sets a public hearing date.
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
determines to form a District or abandon proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with City
Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. •
63
0
Ll
_ f
i
N I 1
i
U c Ic;
rK Y OF RAN'C110 CI:C\.MONGA —
x \GIX(iF.KI \G 1)IVIS10N w T
�'iI;INIT}' �IAP \ill pogo
ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO.3
,z
i c
6
W
_ f
i
N I 1
i
U c Ic;
rK Y OF RAN'C110 CI:C\.MONGA —
x \GIX(iF.KI \G 1)IVIS10N w T
�'iI;INIT}' �IAP \ill pogo
Resolution Yo.
Page 7
EXHIBIT "B"
A portion of the west half of Lots 81 -88, inclusive, Map of Rochester as
recorded in Book 9, Page 20, Records of San Bernardino County, State of
California.
1J
•
0
RESOLUTION NO. * f - `•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
r
WHEREAS, on September 7, 1983, this City Council adopted Resolution
No. * proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as
"Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" for the purpose of installing and
maintaining certain landscape, basin and storm drain improvements to be
located within said assessment district; and
WHEREAS, on September 7, 1983, this City Council preliminarily
approved an Engineer's Report with respect to said "Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3" and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in the City
Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, this City Council desires to form Landscape Maintenance
District No, 3 for the installation and maintenance of certain landscape
improvements to be located therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby declares its intention to order
the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3" for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape improvements
therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972.
SECTION 2: The landscape improvements to be maintained within the
boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No, 3 are more particularly
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 3: The general location of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 3 is more particularly described on the diagram attached as Exhibit "8"
and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 4: Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file
witr the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a full detailed
desrription of the bnundaries of landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and the
proposed assessments upon asszssable lots and parcels of land within said
assessment district.
SECTION 5: This City Council hereby sets the date, time and place of
a public hear nq nn the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 to
he is follows:
(I
DATE: October 5, 1983
T MME: 7:30 P.M. .
PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road,
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SECTION 6: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby
authorized— directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be
published at least once, ten (10) days before the date set for said public
hearing in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in
the City of Ontario circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City
Clerk is also authorized and directed to cause a Notice of Public Hearing to
be sent by first -class mail to those persons whose names and addresses appear
on the last equalized county assessment roll or the State Board of
Equalization Assessment roll with respect to the real property to be included
in Landscape Maintenance District No. 3.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, pity Uerr
t �!
J
Jon D. Mike s, Mayor
•
•
01
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3
-�1 I
C[Tl' OP It; \SCI IO Cl.'C:� \ION'GA w
V,nl u,i
r ",',. ❑ F.N(;INB[RING DIVISION
%'ICINITY NIAV pa
se
•.
e
_
5
a
__ec_�.
4 ,
i-
z
i
m
C[Tl' OP It; \SCI IO Cl.'C:� \ION'GA w
V,nl u,i
r ",',. ❑ F.N(;INB[RING DIVISION
%'ICINITY NIAV pa
se
Resolution No.
Page 4
EXMI3IT "B"
A portion of the west half of Lots 81 -88, inclusive, Map of Rochester as
recorded in Book 9, Page 20, Records of San Bernardino County, State of
California.
r
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
•
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
GGAO's) Afp tC9
Z� r
e,, 'r
x�
x
- >
1977 1
SUBJECT: Aproval of Improvement Extension Agreement for S. A. 80 -09 located
at the northwest corner of Haven and Banyan Avenues and submitted
by the Southern California District of the Lutheran Church
The Southern California District of the Lutheran Church has submitted the
attached Improvement Extension Agreement requesting a six -month extension of
time to complete the off -site improvements for their project located at the
northwest corner of Haven and Banyan Avenues.
A passbook account in the amount of $30,000.00 is being held by the Finance
Dept. as security for the construction of the off -site improvements.
RECOMMENDATION
L J
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the Improvement Extension Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to sign same.
lly submitted,
CBW: BfC: jaa
Attachments
IS
t, p
rL 00 G;rJ G7 ,
J
tMF, tIYP.G...._.
K -I ; zo "
�1T�• h7�G°G'j
LL CL-VD.
l
11
SAI.� CGP.F.11btr.!c�
CITY OF
IIA \CI 10 CUC N10 \GA
I'UkNNI \C DIVEDN
I'TLO L' mom e,
1�
C,O;Ja.Y
TITLE; 14 /:1
f•. \I III;IT: 11 ____ SG\I .E: ��
r�
u
I 1
U
C/r
NORTI i
sESOLUTION NO. * % l'
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE '-:TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI:, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPR01'EvE4T SECURITY FOR S.A. 80 -09
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement
executed on September 7, 1983 ;y Southern California District of the Lutheran
Church - Missouri Synod as Developer, for the improvement of public right -of-
way adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally
located at the northwest corner of Haven and Banyan Avenues; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the cevelnpment of said real property referred to as
S. A. 80 -09; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and
• said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M, 'dnsserm an'C it y Clr`!c
E
Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT
FDA
S.A. 80 -09
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESE47S: That this agreement is made and entered into,
in conformance with the protrusions of the Subdivision Hap Act of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and ttweed Coe said
City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Southo.n iAlifp rn is 0i "rn' of the
rc /C((fd to as the Developer. Lutne ran Cnur,n_q,sSp uP - _ /—
WITMESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement ag(Cement with the
City as a requisite to issuance of buildings permits, and
WHEREAS, said Developer desires an eIten5i0n OT time to co -Jlete the tens of
the said improvement agreement,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as
follows:
1. The completion date of the terms of the said improvement agreement is
hereby eatenLed by a period of months from the date of eapirat!pn of
_y_
the said agreement,
2. Increase in improvement securities to reflect current improvement costs
shall be furnished by the developer with this agreement and shall be
approved by the City Attorney,
3, The required bond and the additional principal amounts thereof are set
forth on the attached sheet.
4. All other terms and conditions of the said imprnvement agreement shall
remain the same.
As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to
tDmoly with "me, the De'vrinpef has Submitted the below dCSCr,.od improvement
security, and has affixed his slgnature hereto:
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Description; pass Bnpl Acct. Additional Principal Amount; None Re,uired
Surety: t14an406E67
Address: First int.'state land
MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND
Description; Additional Principal Amount: N/A
Surety:
Address:
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTING BOND
Additional Cash Deposit: N/A
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEF BOND
Prmripai
To be
pas o•rpr in ,iccry Linr= if tno
................. '................. I..........:...................
CITY OF RAYC!'tl r',r AMo'gA pEVC.OPER
CALIFORNIA, a n4nln pal corns. at'On
BY:
Attest:
Luren H..a(d. --inn,
NOTE: DrvnnprR's srcxnrunt MUST nE NOTARIZED
f4Jr I.�M, N s4 'A W
A.: c T ":"F•;T •
The Souttem California pistnct of the Lutheran
Church - _issouri Srrad t,,raln called ASS =;ZR,
v:..oso ad,. ,,,s Ts i4 C,i .p;t PoPO rand Bnuleva ^d_'ns 4n0a1es, Ca. KG22_
de (d A.) hereby ar.a :gn and ser ever to the ! of Fa icon Cu ca ".n :a
heceine`.ter eferred • as ASSIMCE, all ri = :ir, title T�nterusr
Of wl3tgver nature, of oa ssi anor, in and to the insured g —ent of
assigner to ;he _ f)rct Interstate Bank _
evlderc d ass 1,,"k
io the am art a _�j, -fig _ . -. - :cd 148
aycc0: < ?os _ =]_
M'hich is delivered t,. ^
s
ass:c nee i,e re wit n. dsstgnor
-,cot r. ^r Les h eIth ,t the r g t. i the .n sera nee u:
aceoant by the Federal Sayings and L Insurances COrperatton and
Includes and gives the r. ;:at to the assignee to redeem, collect,
and withdraw the :ell docent of such account at any time without
dice to the assirnor. Assignor agrees that this as s iganent is
civen is secartty for SF 80- 09 /P.M. 4735 - construction and .
approved redian islard, adrkwdv landscaping, sidewalks, and repair to n e`
meets dacd;ed during tenst ruction.
sae :hat cha assignee may; o not rue to assigner- ieavon, -ol-
lect and withdraw the amount nt f for the purpose of paying for any or
ali_i Gyms nahorvzM by the said ag re•emenc.
Assignor haraby notifies the above-nnmed savings and Loan Association
of this assi;nren�tp.
Gated thin /7fA d.y of _Q/iTf 19/1.
ASS iG�OR
By
r.
Y_C°1PT G : -rCt OF : SSTol:MENT RF.CE -PT FOR CERTIFICATE, AND
D_I3i.. .:V Tt+ PA5' EAP.A i:L.S
Re cerpt an here acknowledged
e
to ri Aes Of ,cnee o written notice Peceint is acknowledged of the
of the nssianmcnt to said Assignee above asstgn1e1L and the rrrti-
of the account and certificate ficate identified in the above
idaauficd nbwe, we have noted assignment
r. our records the Ase,ynee's
iu:erest in said account as shown iP hh = i7�F—arM-y-oc tea
by the shove assignment and have to pay any earnings on the above -
etoined n cupy u` this sheer. we identified account to the above -
orttfy ;hit we have received no earned aseignor until ocher w,se
of lien, enc.mbrancc, hold, notified in writing by the
clam, or ohl inat ten of the above- ass ty r.e e.
fled account prior to the
Jnoent to the, Asilg:l P. n. we
., "he nnyrent to the
Ass:: S
""u t in n�ltnre
,I'll rhl• .� '.,nua Ind! lounilav
,i l." 'k 1g ttl, .1 .. n,-1 atlon.
•• •...a ih,s f: _i_day of Q }i ,.:_, Ddcnd this day of
Yi11�, � : � •
)
g, —nwov<
A
•
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
f T
f_I IZ
D
-107- 1
SUBJECT: Intent to Vacate An East /Hest Alley located between Calaveras and
Vinmar Avenues
On November 25, 1981, Planning Commission reviewed the request to vacate the
above - described alley along with the portion of the alley located on the west
side of Calaveras Avenue. Planning Commission recommended that they alley be
vacated through City Council procedure. The portion located on the west side
of Calaveras has been vacated by City Council Resolution No. 83 -24 approved on
February 3, 1982.
Attached is a letter received from the property owners adjacent to the alley
on the east side of Calaveras requesting a vacation of said alley.
)he alley is unpaved and is not used for entrance to any of the lots. There
is a chain link fence along the rear of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 with Lots 4 and 5
being vacant. Lots 8 and 9 have been merged into one lot and contain a house
with a block wall to rear and side. Lot 26 fronting on Calavaras contains a
new house; Lot 33 fronting on Vinmar contains an existing house. These two
lots are not fenced at this time.
Drainage does not appear to be a problem. The land slopes slightly to the
south. Since the alley is unpaved, it has not been used to carry drainage
flows to the street. The owners are aware that they would become responsible
for the lot to lot drainage upon vacation of the alley.
RECOMMENDATION
A
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the
public hearing to vacate the said alley on October 5, 1983.
ppctfully sub itted,
�vr�j.K
4Lhmen a
• RESOLUTION NO. * '! % -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE EAST /WEST ALLEY
LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES, SOUTH OF
9TH STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under
Section II37T, et, seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the
Street Vacation Act of 1941.
SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to
vacate the east /west alley between Calaveras and Vinmar Avenues, south of 9th
Street a City street, as shown on Map No. V -030 on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A"
and by reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 5th day
of October, T-983 at 7:30 p.m., in the Lions Park Community Center Building,
located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place
• for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of
its determining whether said City street is necessary for present or
prospective street purposes.
SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices
to be posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof
proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 30
fret apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall
have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in
lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE
STREET ".
SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations
and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk
shall attestto the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published
10 drys befnr,, the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily
Reoort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario,
Califrnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of the alley (201wide) as shown on Eureka Gardens Tract No. 1829, •
as recorded in Map Book 28, Page 20 in Official Records of San Bernardino
County, State of California, bounded by the following:
On the East, by the West right -of -way line of Vinmar Avenue; on the West, by
the East right -of -way line of Monte Vista Avenue (presently known as Calaveras
Avenue); on the North, by the Southerly property lines of Lots 4 through 9; on
the South, by the Northerly property lines of Lots 7 and 14; all of the said
Tract Map.
•
E
1
•
0
EXHIBIT "B"
Reservations and Exceptions
The vacation described in Exhibit "A" pertains to the use of said land for
alley purposes. All utility uses are retained and excepted.
r
•
il
I
V -030
9
> OF
a
T
Q i i
CV
40
27 30
1y °.
r•
L,y,p ,4 Qe',
•
r� 57
1
28
35
22 fJ
a
I
..�4
rs
r1ti 20
36
��•,.
I11, 2l
4 1 5 1 6
(a 'i
G ! GOMEZ, 'a
II 12 `
TO BE VACATED
(.I IY 01• RAN( I10 (,l (,:\r \1O \(.A
I °.N(;INh:1 °.RI \G Ui \'ISION
_ t_t N
_.. VICINITY „AP
.Iqn r;IF`•
130mLIEA 33 ROJAS
CV
40
27 30
1
28
35
42
a
I
j
J
36
43
:f1
30
37 -
- -,I
�1
44
W(r�
31 39
7
(I)
32 � 39
S
1,
TO BE VACATED
(.I IY 01• RAN( I10 (,l (,:\r \1O \(.A
I °.N(;INh:1 °.RI \G Ui \'ISION
_ t_t N
_.. VICINITY „AP
.Iqn r;IF`•
PAGe I OF 3
C
JULY t,7, 1923 •
Dear Str,.
=N o.CCordaNC.e withGCNVersatioN,
(Garb {he followW;c� lei {er is fcr,.:ctrdecl RS a.
Pet;4.tcN to vo.CcAe alley.
Alley Itro juesl ioN is IOCakecl bet wee-N Calo veras
Averuuc nraA \/;many Averoue., iN the CAY 04'Cuca.,�ncr�a.
I -t i5 cirrec {ly ocrkh of 8735 Cala.vercls AveNUe gNrk
directly rdorth o-�8'732 V•ovmar AveNtle.. This o.Uey is
also directly seukh of Br95 E.9tb Street 820c E.9-L"
s {reek aN& 8207 E. rltn s }reek.
=t is also Lhvder,kcei kha{ haviv3 GeroSe.Nt d {o
{he vacakirJJ of alley ruorkh of 9m Calaveras Avemuo -I
C bhr. c ly is hereby relieved of the Fc11e tN3 respeN,;b'tthies: •
a) C, {r is KNQW loNqer MPSpONCtble fcr aY.c�Ai�.
b) DrwNane tc Surroum&`13 are05.
G) Prever \3k,ory of uJaker YuC -et£ `,pectF,ca \ly whe.re.
(Llli y is ko be vgCATeS.
C4r�F, errmcre., 4 iS Clear t.hak
omce alley rs vac0k -ed by pe },ktos aNA approved hY
the C,kyr the pe {ttront.r'S MAY runt heNecje or cxl�er
this documerot . =k is also urodercko0d that
t4 C�TT,C.IhI ClCr.a YT, ety'� arvfi 15 k�, bCQ L,. -ICA a, l(l T1P
•_t is al;o u�wl�r�tcecl for the prcte.c�iero 0f ,
the. C�4.y nn:d rVei�F,bnr's Goar_r.rnuvl, 6hak oroc.e ibis
dac, ie „){ tp C. vt• l the CCNFCNtJ wQA meptv,n,�
..C�t4h,r1 L11a11 �lr, -E Ic t• 1-A VO r(erl NOY CM acJJ ?�. rr7 nmy 4;qy.
This le4ker 75 be.,n'� Fort- ,!r,rc \crl no arJ Cff -rtr0.1
l rlecu:mervt to the C;ry of ta)RCh.r'g. Ihrs r5 cL �rcpc'0.1 •
which SIFKS approval by Fie CAY t0 vc,cal:e alley
Grid Sub - Divide property.
-1 o
p,lc;e 2 C'F 3
The Ciy o� RntaCllp Cuca-moNOO �E �lt '-.Cr'Si
does 1- e_�uire a tae a+ g1127.C� kewar<ls khe, oropcs,�l
}rr�NSHCtIen. aeir� tr,ak h's is a Fve pnr�y kra s-
ackiorJ Q, ketal o� •,rr. �S.CY :,:ill be ree;,�irred From Eac'n
pav+y or aN n mcvin t fro m aN� 9 vero porky khat v .11
r�Tlez.t khe reG;u rred Ioak�NCe.
_ , Jnm1e5 A. 3ct'11Er, 11 be khe Gi1leckor e
f jW85, p0.roA & L-y here prormtse. to pYer;P'Nt M
Gull fl 125•co {o -Ole Cky o-� RR Nche Cuenm e ;�a.
have rend this dccta.' ewA nrv& eolt�ratS Wikhlr�.
= CSo UNCIGY`���W� tYIJ prci0a�l O'N& Cko C.CN�''?Nt
cdlcy Lj0.c4e&.
As red e,�ec\ Icy khe c;ky o� fn�ivee.r's tht
�ollowi.� Narme� Qre •1N 0.9rP.¢•mz,V� c \N� ku11y uNder-
•;_,1 < \t:'i. 'EF7� CC�-JY2��'tS lU �'iY11 nI:
1. Sarcneo A• Bot111Er �i,TSSY ���r \�^`�"`
fl735 Colarerrts AVE.,
2 Cruz t Daroef Roja:
8732 Vin+rrnar Ave.,
3. Calis6ro GC.<n`.l;L
A2o7 9 ±h <6r,aF
Cn c 1 -rnr � cja Cnl, G. -- -�-- --
./ r
4 N \ornOe5
R c0�u h
9 e 15trrr k, ��L c� C r 1L�
L �rcarmo ro3a,Ca \'��,
I!'
PAGE 3 0+ 3
CLOeeNZO =NfoNte •
mr. Loremio I"i oLrAe- 15 0. {reC�SLL'reY YepreriCn;���:c�
-�!,e ',C1,urcl, o;' NazayeNe" Al- Oiou3'm properky is
moo occupied by W. LorerNZU sv�avke l,ehas
breN G;veN Qu�h Or'Lck "m
vacctike a11ey. PreUev4ly 8I4i5 E. qk5 SEreA is
OwNed by khe Ghurch o;' NazareNe� QIk4�ou�F, ik
is be1ro� tented ko arooil,er prtrty•
This 'is a prope:,aL which 5eeK-1 apprevolby
the c-Ay 'N order thak nc {1014 r QoY be t txen to _
Cv tca�e CO ey o.�, G ib divide P,Cpercy. •
Reopec -6 -v 11 yow—,,
9Me6 A. BoTt��NR
I
11 I.T.
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983 r• 'U
TO: City Council and City Manager 19
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement and Security for Parcel Map 6051 located on
the north side of Manzanita between Sacramento and Beryl Avenues
Mr. Fred Nelson, Jr. has submitted the attached agreement and security for
construction of the off -site improvements in connection with Parcel Map 6051.
Parcel Map 6051 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1981 for
the division of 1.9 acres of land into 4 parcels within the R- 1,20,000 zone
located on the north side of Manzanita Avenue between Sacramento and Beryl
Avenues.
The developer is submitting the following in security:
Fa ;thful Performance Bond; $13,600.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 6,800.00
RECOMPIENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the agreement and security submitted for Parcel Map 6051 and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign same.
Respectfully submitted,
LB��:jaa
AttachTnent
p ?.
4
PARCEL MAP 6051
�ei3x
Nklcll 7
OQSf / A(
NF
L
e�
0 It
Z
,E /'io rpggcd
lLS JJC1 Pa
Le..n
0
i
�J
sp
0�
q
w
8 g moo
4 QI
•S •1 ° i ij 24 V I
1b\nil
.,ha Fc:h
DOW
If m4,VVV1T4
��•. [�ru vL
w f•TY(
I Jut°'
Il Ee rlv ream
kl
�' ✓ °ii iie(• b (e rip i...
5 i9rj
yn•
/ is !W(. p•
^S�
a,
acp I I
LANS 4c4C
h0
r
V
n 9
m
P.'46fL J_
'.l.•
G2 ^Fi n
'v
xfl
e
^O1
v
�
r
•9
� Ns.
ry; A
�
InQii'
�ei3x
Nklcll 7
OQSf / A(
NF
L
e�
0 It
Z
,E /'io rpggcd
lLS JJC1 Pa
Le..n
0
i
�J
sp
0�
q
w
8 g moo
4 QI
•S •1 ° i ij 24 V I
1b\nil
.,ha Fc:h
DOW
If m4,VVV1T4
��•. [�ru vL
w f•TY(
I Jut°'
Il Ee rlv ream
kl
�' ✓ °ii iie(• b (e rip i...
5 i9rj
(J $Mr per ) Of
^S�
a,
LANS 4c4C
h0
d
V
n 9
m
ic'
x:
'v
t
^O1
�ei3x
Nklcll 7
OQSf / A(
NF
L
e�
0 It
Z
,E /'io rpggcd
lLS JJC1 Pa
Le..n
0
i
�J
sp
0�
q
w
8 g moo
4 QI
•S •1 ° i ij 24 V I
1b\nil
.,ha Fc:h
DOW
If m4,VVV1T4
��•. [�ru vL
w f•TY(
I Jut°'
Il Ee rlv ream
kl
�' ✓ °ii iie(• b (e rip i...
5 i9rj
(J $Mr per ) Of
title;
CITY 01: R:1NCI 10 Cl'Cr \ \IQ \(�r1 A
' , \ PM 6051
ri �i t
ENUNP.P.RING DIVISION MAP VICINIT MAP —
N
19VICINITY pa c
R
RESOLUTION NO. * ) �-' l In
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 6051
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on
Septe,itb r 1, 1983 by Fred Nel.cn, Jr. as developer, for the improvement of
public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the north side of Manzanita between
Sacramento and Beryl Avenues; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning
Commission, Parcel Map No. 6051; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by
gcvd and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement Agreement and said
• Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
herby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalr of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lau re nn M. W asserman, City flerTc
/Sea
P
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
i
ilk
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCN!0aA
111PR01'EKCNT AGREENI HT
FOR
PARCEL PAP NO. 6051
CROW ALL hi-N BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered
into; in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Pegvlatiooe
of the Ct ty of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City by and between said City and
s Fred A. Nelson, Jr.
hereinafter referred to as the 0eve Dyer.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the
City of Parcel Nap dumber 6051 in accordance with the
provisions of the report of the Ity ngmeer thereon, and any amendments
thereto; located
north side of Nanzanita between Sacramento and Beryl and,
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said Dev-
eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and apprgaed by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pupose of securing
said approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer
as follows:
• 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all
inarovenents described on Pane 3 hereof within nine months from the
date hereof, as per Section 2.12 of Ordinance N0. U.
2. The term of this agreement shall he nine months commencing on the date
of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on
the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tern
has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the pro-
visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weel.s prior to
the default date, and inclu, ng ttances of necessity
.ns id i sang .cat of request, ..
for additional time, In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the rest[ to review the provisions hereof, including ise construction standards,
cost estimate, and sufficiency to [he substantial security, and to require a I.
adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes [herein.
a. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions
to be complete^ by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said
Developer and /or his Surety the full cast and expense incurred in so doing.
S. Encroachm,nnt pempits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of
the City Ergir,eer prior to start of any wort within the public right of way,
are the Developer shall conduct such work in full compliance m th the r
nal,tIons mnt,:mcd therein. Nomconpli,:nce .nay result in stepping of the
n.irl by the Clty, and 115essi —nt of the penalties provided.
6. f.ibi¢ right of way Ir;.moserene work. requirtd shall be cpnstructsd in can.
fill ,; e;n urth apprnvre. irprorrncnt {.lans, Standard Smolflceiltns, amt
:nnar,l Dllw llln,, and ,iny s clot .mend -irnts thereto. Const•I'Ctlon shall
any ,inUtr offer Incidental work deemed metr Ssary for
d,, .1IgP ur put ,c s,!f r.ty.
•
•
age 2
'RFROYE".EIIT AOaE:MENT
7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to co :ole-
tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the
event of enjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
means.
S. The Developer Shall be resell ihle for replacement, relocation, or re-
moval of any conpenent of any irrigation water system in conflict with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system,
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rack and
other debris from the public right of way resulting irom work done on
the adjacent property or within said right of way,
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
completion of the tens of this agreement shall be subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said irpro ; = -erf
security shall be not less than the a000nt shown below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUB!IITTED:
Faithful Performance Bond 11,600
Material and Labor Bond 6,000
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to bo duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities repaired by law on the eites
set forth opposite their signatures:
w DEVELOPER Fred A Nelson, Jr,
BY: �iw DATE:
BY: rrrttf"' DATE:
N I T'IESS: PATE:
CITY uF RANCHO CUCAMn:,GA, CALMR "TA
a municipal corporation
ATTEST:_ � .0 IiY CLERK
D %, TE: �
'i I
APPROM AS 10 FORM
nrt A
� un
UrKW ptwlrra u,rOrM ^,
0
CE ri or R QX:N) C.
CM 'T.IUCTM; .%•:D 1-oND I-ST!6%7C
E...lC-.l.%C:C!":;7. MVIT FEE ;C';-DU-
(.t ... In to "Imprctor's Sep ")
DATE: Sept~. 1981 ?EMIT no. L S i 4
rii• w.ssnc.Pm figsi city Dts.iog :;..% 433
"OTC:
Dots so, t.,I.de fef for oi"o; t
nest
CONSTRMI& MST F3TM%Tt
ITDI ot.A.-';
rM-,-
1..I� I F. 479
F.
6. QQ
2V4.06
r I1.11 I" C.Fl
L. F.
.%.r,. In,, (sim in)
L. r.
I" P.C.C. glAc,stic
Dtil-e Ann,..,rh
t
?.i. . Crft44 Cotter "o
=7
_3 1.
Itt'.1 4
C.Y.
1.50
667 gn
t1l.rt.d Emban.,..t
-erne lcn of snefrac
S.F.
-15
•
A.C. i �xlor L300 tons I
E, IN
I
1-0.1 'n non con ., I
Tug
dl. too '.)
1 1—d., son 1 5b. 4
1 1.1N
60.6J
DO
?,Ilh A.C. (rrolch)
o;
'diolt Slot r_o. to Ctld. I
I CA.
1—,"' 1, V14 1 In ClId.
A.
I FA
0.,0
1 lej.00
off
III
oil
if
fill
Cry:STVUCTIO.'l COST 11 .. no
CONT,I::GE:,CV COSTS 1_739.29
ToT.J. CONVIRVMON COSTS 13,677.19
rAMIPUL PFV!l'rMA:XF, M41 (106'4 13 ,6011.00
T.WR AND )0'41 (50%1 6 FO,).Ol
U:V!l:TI0N r-.J . .........
: !; r)::p (C%H
n
u
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY INSTRUMENT
for
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into 01S —y
da
of S 19$3, by and between sa.• .4.w. dtci_MP
(r�� y ♦ /1N #_, hereinafter ref e rhee to i
- "Len er ^, Ina F.i eu A,N saa/ S4 hereinafter referred
to as 'Borrower ", and E C TT�iRANCH AMOYGd, CAL IFOR 0.'f A.
hereinafter referred to as 'City', provides as follows:
WITNESSETN:
WHERFAs, Lender Is a is none l al institution subject to
regulation by the state of federal government within the meaning
of California Government Cade Section 66499(a)(3); and
WHEREAS, from the proceeds of a loan fro, Lender to
Borrower. Lender has on deposit for the account of Borrower, the
sum of '��a i�/Daa(u.Yq Fv ua. /f u.v9Req hey /arts two - thirds
(213) o win %n sea lion n s.itute and be ret erred to as "the
performance fund" and the other One -third (1/3) of which shall
constitute and be referred to as the 'payment fun.^ and
WHEREAS. Borrower has entered Into an Agreement, herein.
after referred to as "the Agreement ", with the City whereby
Borrower, agrees to install and complete certain des 7�9qna t
Public improvements, which said Agreement dated SgA,, b'S6
19 9'3 and identified as referring to Pr eject y
f s-1T ereby referred to and made a pert hereof.
• NOW, THEREFORE, in cons ide sjj..,,l on o1 the Wty giving
final final approval to the Project known as /�aGiI,liL 7F
and authorizing the recordation of any tract dr parcel
pertaining therein, tenter and Borrower agrees:
1. The performance fund is secure tv pledged to the City
to insure that Borrower, its heirs, successor,, executors and
administrators, shall In all things stand to and abide by, and
w III and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and
provisoes Of the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as
therein provided, on Borrower's part to be kept and performed
atthe time and in the manner therein and in all
respects according to its true and IawfuI meaning, and to insure
that Borrower, Its he lrs, SY CCeSsors, executors and
administrators, shall indemnify and save harmless City, its
officers, agents and employees as stipulated in the Agreement,
2. Lender shall disburse the performance fund to the
City In Such anoints as the City demands, promptly upon receipt
of written demands signed by the City Engineer of the City, and
specifying therein that Borrower is in default. under the Agree.
ment or this Agreement.
3. in the event City c ... elites legal action to recover
all or any portion of the performanre fund, then the City shall
be entitled to recover, In d,ditinr to the amount of the oarfor-
manre fund, Costs and 1ed5011blo expenses and fees, Including
"Asonsbin attornry's fees. A
4, Lender and Borrower agree. that the pavment fund is
security plegrd for the payment of all Contractors,
suhcool, ict.irs, lahorert, material,,, and other persons employed
in the nrrinrmin Cn of the Agrw•ment and ehn are referred to
T it In 15 ( ce -isonr in, .,in Sect inn 3031) of Part 4 of Division 13
of the Cl vt 1, Co Hr of the Slate Of C111fornla for materials
furol ynrd er Iibnr performed of any kind, ur amounts Joe under
the pm`mployment Insurance Act with re SP,ct to such work or
labor, and that L,•nder will pay the s,lme in an amount not esceed-
Ing the payment fond, and in case Sul to is brought w111 pay, in
r c}
r_
U
addition t0 the payment f no, costs and reasonable expenses and
by: Fra<a t1, N�:sd,y sic.
fees, including attorney's fees.
ate'
5. This Agreement and the payment fund shall insure t0
the benefit of any and all persons, compam i ea aoa cornoratiell
e
entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section
3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a
right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon
this Agreement or against the payment fund,
The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
6. No change, extension of time, alteration or addition
to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be perf or -idl
and agrees:
thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shat: in
any wise affect " " Agreement or Lender and Borrower's obliga-
tions hereunder, and they do hereby waive notice of any such
and acceptance of the required
change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of
work, and the performance of all
the ggreeme nt or to the work or to the specification. This
Agreement shall become Nfective upon acceptance by the City and
perfnrmance fund not Claimed by
shall remain in fuli force and effect until such time as the City
the City in accordance with the
;hall release the performance fund and payment fund as
ereinaf ter provided,
14 WITNESS WHEREOF, Lender and Borrower have executed
at security for cost, and
his Agreement on the day and year first above written.
rnasonable expenses and fees of
the City, including reasonable
HOER:
k of Amer tea NT 6 SA .
• 2. Six (6) months after the completion and acceptance
x 607 intN one e
of the required work, City will
ratty, alifornta 92311 _Manager
•
- -iii t—Te
total of all claim, on which an
WER:
by: Fra<a t1, N�:sd,y sic.
ate'
rva��
e
itTTe
-Tl
The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby accepts the
feregoing Improvement Security Instrument
and agrees:
1. Upon final completion
and acceptance of the required
work, and the performance of all
acts specified in the Agreement,
City will release any part of the
perfnrmance fund not Claimed by
the City in accordance with the
above provisions, not needed as
security deemed necessary by the City for any guarantee or
t warranty Der l ad or not needed
at security for cost, and
rnasonable expenses and fees of
the City, including reasonable
attorney't fees.
• 2. Six (6) months after the completion and acceptance
of the required work, City will
release the payment fund except
Sur, Part thereof as equals the
total of all claim, on which an
Lctiir his Jeer filed and notice
thereof given in welt ing to the
City COueCll of the city.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a *unicipnl corpnra[ion
by'
Nu vn
nrtlsr:
f
C ty Clerk
° c
oUc
�E
¢o�
u'u
N --
01
u�-
a-
u
N
Q_-
¢ -
a_3
4 Vi
P, P.O. BOX X1003 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 Date JULY 13, 1983
IRREVOCABLE
All drafts must be marked
Advising bank reference no
STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT
Drawn Under sank m America
SDSD -12061
I
Advising bark
For account of
FRED A. NELSON, JR.
6579 14ESADA
I
RANCHO CUCAIONGA, CA 91701
To benebcmry
Amount
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJONGA
U.S313,600.00 (THIRTEEN THOUSAND SIX
9320 BASELINE ROAD
HUNDRED AND NOP OO UNITED STATES DOLLARS)
RANCHO CUCAIONGA, CA 91701
Expratron date
Ga!V lemon
❑ refers to cable ativlCP, of th15 Cretllt.
I We h ^reby 9slnbllsb our Irrevocable letter of credit In your favor available by your tlra!IS drawn at ____
vail ble by your drawn ____
_SIGHT -
I nn
us
and rib CCn1V by documents Speal/letl helow
LETTER SIGNED BY CITY ENGINEER OF RANCHO CUCAIOHGA
STAT114G THAT FRED A. NELSON, JR. IS
IN DEFAULT UNDER. THE AGREEMENT DATED JULY
8, 1983.
COVERING I1IPROVEIIENTS ON PROPERTY XNONN AS
PARCEL MAP 16051, RANCHO CUCAIONGA AS PER
THE AGREEMENT DATED JULY 8, 1983.
I
I
i
I
•
!.. nr nyr n,
—_ —_
.n It ;II Pla 11 'If n b r anq �"
Agr�ein ban. s mrhhr aLOn
0
I"I "a•rt ,. r s nl I 1'I '. b' IL,I'r m,r. ,r nil
drnnn arrrl IP r , I.I,rrv..11 .II PI "., n.. +r u I tvdorn
F,n I•rplralon I If^ �r n '. ,Ir,til
jrnfn•nly yplu[
/
AUlhomed counVrt signal Authgrrl s,Un,,,r!
_ �—
Place. dale, nam =and slgrature of the advl Sing bank
"I r rm,.rl
0
•
9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
��MONc
�i T
u I>
1977
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7349 and Bonds and Agreement submitted by
Lewis Development Company and located on the `north side of 4th
Street, east Route 15 Freeway
Parcel Map 7349 was approved by Planning Commission on May 22, 1983 for the
division of 20.45 acres of land into 8 parcels within. the General Industrial
Area (Subarea 14).
A request for a revision of Condition No. 48 of the City Engineer's Report was
approved by Planning Commission on June 22, 1983. The revision allows for the
formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 in place of the C.C. &R.s.
A resolution setting the Public Hearing for October 5, 1983 for Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3 is on tonight's agenda.
Lewis Development Company, developer, has submitted bonds and agreement to
guarantee the construction of off -site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $240,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $120,000.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
Parcel Map 7349 and accepting the bonds and agreement if Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3 is approved.
Respectfully submitted,
L8H:QY.fjaa /\T
Attachments
t 7,
O� \1' \11p1n
CITY OP RANCI10 CUCANIONGA
-`- 73
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY NIAP
0
AP
-`- 73
RESOLUTION D
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 7349),
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
0.
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PARCEL MAP NO. 7349,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7349, submitted by Lewis
Development Company, Subdivider, and consisting of 8 parcels, located on the
north side of 4th Street, east of Rt. I -15 Freeway, being a division of a
portion of the west 1/2 of lots 81 to 88, Map of Rochester, recorded in Book 9
of Maps, page 20 was approved by the Planninn Commission as provided in the
State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of
Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7349 is the Final Map of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map
offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
is 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf
of said City; and
2. That said Parcel Map No. 7349 be and the same is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized
to present same to the County Recorder to be filed
for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983.
AYES:
NOES: "
ABSENT:
Jon D. Nikels, Mayor
0 ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR
W.aC F'. MAP 7349
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; That this agreement is
made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the
applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Cal ifnnii a, a municipal corporation, by and between said City,
hereinafter referred to as the City, and uwis Hoes
of California hereina�r m referred to as [he
eve apex,
WITNESSETH
THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain
real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved
subdivi sign k awn as Parcel Map 7349 ; and
WHEREAS. safd City has established certain red., Cements
to be met by said Developer as prereaulsite to approval of said
subdivision generally located at N„eah aides of 4th Street.
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by
said Developer as follows:
I. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at
Developer's exVensc all improvements described on Page 6 here-
of within twelve months from the effective date hereof.
2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the
resolution of the Council of said City approving this
agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow-
ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten-
sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid-
ed.
3. The Developer may request an extension of time to
complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitt.J to
the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration
date hereof, and shall Contain a statement of circumstances
necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the
right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the
construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security,
and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has
occurred during the term hereof.
4. if the Developer fails or neglects to comply with
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right
at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful
means, and thnr ^upon recover from the Developer and /or his surety
the full cost and expense incurred.
S. The 9eveloper shall provide metered water service to
each I i t of said do v e I o pine nt ' accordanr.e with the regulations,
Schedules, ind fee; Of the Cucimanga County Nate, District.
6. The Dnvelnper shall be responsible. for replaCement,
t tOn, or remavaI of any conp0 Runt of any irrigation water
syst nm in coif l i c t with COnslrnction of rnoo4 rid improvements t0
the satisficlinn of LID, City Enginrdr and the nvm,r of such water
Syitrm
t
/�. Tracts and Cum /Ind, P.M.
n
7. Improvements repo fired to be constructed shall
conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of
the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file in
the office of the City rngineer. Said improvements are tabulated
an the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on
page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon
by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construc-
tion of aiy transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract
boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage.
Errors or ommissions discovered during constructin shall be
corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer, oevised work
due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the prov:si ons
of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original
planned works.
B. Construction permits shall be obtained by the
Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of
work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with
attention given to safety procedures, control or dust, noise, or
other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public
utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this
section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor.
9, The Developer shall be responsible for removal of
ail loose rocks and other debris from public rights- of-way within
or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to
said development.
10. Mork done within existing streets shall be
diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right
to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in
completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from in a*
Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means.
11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedica-
tion of the streets and easements in said subidivis ion, up to the
completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said
City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling
public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said
street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from
such defective or Mnnerous ronditinnr.
Until the completion of all improvements, herein incorporated on
Page 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as
improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said
Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the
conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued
by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the
public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed
to be made.
ii. Parkway trees required to be planted ah a 11 be
planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grad, ng
and cleanup has been comp le led. Planting shall be done as
pray, ded by Ord, nano, in accordance with the pl and ing diagram
approved by the City Community Development Di +ec tor.
The O,, vP. loper tIM1 a 11 be responsible for na, of a in, n all ;t roes
pl ant PA i n gnod health u t,l the and of the guaranteed
maintOndbcn period, or for one year after plant, n9, wh,chover ,s
later,
17, The Developer is reSpanS,ble for n,ltinq all cold,.
lions Pstabl,Shed by the City pursuant to the Subd,v,sion
_Z_ •
0
Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development,
and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed
thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance Ly
the City, and no improvement Security provided hereinwith shall
be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and
authorized by the City Council of the City.
14. This agreement shall not terminate until the
maintenance guarantee security herein After described has been
released by the City, or until a mew agreement together with the
required improvement security bas been submitted to the City by a
successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City
Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the
improvement security therefor has been released.
l5. The improvement security to be furnished by the
Developer with this agreement shall Consist of the following and
shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney:
A.
To secure faithful Performance of this agreement.
1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized
Corporate Sureties in the form and Content
specified by Government ''ode Section 66499.1.
2. An improvement Security instrument in the form
and content specified by the City Attorney.
3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable
bonds of the kind approved for securing
deposits of public monies.
B.
To secure laborers and materialmen;
1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized
corporate sureties in the form and content
.
specified by Government Code Section 66499,1,
2. Am Improvement Security Instrument in the form
and content specified by the City Attornez,
3. A deposit with City of money on negotiable
bonds r, the kind approved for securing
C.
A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment
by the Developer to the engineer or Surveyor whose
certificate appears upon the Final Map for the
setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street
centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline
e notes to the City. The amount of the deposit
may be any amount certified by the engineer or
surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no
value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown
on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained
herein,
Said Cash deposit may be refunded as soon as probe•
dure permits after receipt by the City of the
Cent of line tie note, and written assurance Of
Payment in full from the engineer or surveyor.
D.
The often i red bonds and the principal amour t
thereof are sot forth on page 6 of this agreement,
16.
The Of ve lr per .,wants that the imp env ements
Arse flood in
this agroe,pnt <hall be from from defects in
materials and
Xc,k.an,h,p. Any and all Portions of the imPrnvr-
ments fop rd
to be do or t iVe within one (l) year following the
data on which
the improvements are dCCCVtrd by the City shall he
repaired or
rrpl.,,! by Oeveloper free of all charges to the
City. The
Developer shall furnish a ^aintendnce guarantee
security in a
,um equal to ten perrent (10%) of the construction
x
n
estimate or 5100.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful
performance of Developer's obligations as described in this para-
graph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the
faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the
Developer to de Specified work with respect to any parkway
maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been
accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted
by the City, the other improvement security described in this
agreement may be released provided that such release is othe rw Ise
authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City
Ordinance.
17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such
public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect
him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered
by this agreement from claims for property damages which may
arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under
this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any
contractor or subcontractor, or anyone di racily or indirectly
employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused
by the negligence of the Develop, or any contractor or
Subcontractor or anyone employed by -said persons. The public
liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as
additonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers,
agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors
and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued
hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance
shall be as follows:
A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily
injury or death liability limits of not less the
$300,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for each
•
accident or occurrence, and property damage Iiabil -
fty limits of not less than S100,000 for each ace,
dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of
5250,000 for claims which may arise from the opera-
tions of the Developer in the performance of the
work herein provided.
8. Automobile liahility insurance covering all
vehicles used l n the performance of this agreement
providing bodily injury liability limits of not
less than 5200,000 for each person and 5300,000 for
each accident or occurrence, and property damage
li ablli ty limi is of not less than 550,000 for each
accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not
less than 5100,000 which may arise from the opera.
tions of the Developer or his Contractor in
performing the work provided for herein.
is. That before the cannot ion of this agreement, the
Developer shall file with the City a 'er of icate or certificates
of Insurance covering the spec if,ed Insurance. Each such
certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the
canrrl let ions, or reduction in coveraam of any policy evidences
by such Certificate, before the aepirat no of thirty (30) days
after the City shall have received notification by registered
mall from the insurance carrier.
As evidence of understanding the prnvlsinns contained herein, and
of intent Lo c,p 1 with son^, Lhe Suhdi e der has Submitted the
f of Ioi, u & sC r, bed imprnvemont sec u I ty, end has a f f l.ed his
signature her elm
-A- 0
. 1,
1 11
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
Type: Principal Amount: $240,800
Name alid address of surety: Developer's Insurance Caara,
•
MATERIAL 3A AND LABOR PAYMENT ca 92e01
Type:
Principal A... or: $220,400
Name and address of Surety: pavel Opae's insurance Company
333 Wilshire. Mahelm, CA 92801
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION
Type'
Principal Amount: S 1,600
Name and address of Surety:
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE
Type' Principal Amount: 24,000.DD
Name and address of surety: Developer's Ineurance company
333 Wilshire, Anaheim, CA 92801
TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE By
THE CITY
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged With all
formalities required by law
an the da[ set forth opposite their
signatures.
•
Ishii. Maros f tifornia
o
Date _August ]4, 1981 e y
M Developer
ai
A Ag atu re
Rich ard A, Lev is
IN+EEI%alD rT4 4ted
Date by
—' ,Developer
Ign aT cure
rime
Accepted:
City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California
A Municipal Corporation
By'
Mayor
Attest:
_ —'-
/ _ s
Approved:
DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOtARIZED
�5-
•
-Snor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
For Improvement Of: PARCEL MAP 7379
Date: 3/83 omPUted Oy: C --
File Re erenc e: pJy, + City Ong. No.
NOTE; Does vet include current fee For
writing permit w pavement deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM V N Y UNIT UNIT COST S AOOUYT
L.F.
P.C.C. Curb - 12" C.F.
6.00
P.L.L. Curb - 8" C.F.
3,871
P.C.C. Curb only 6" C.F.
546
A.C. Serve (S200 min.)
21SD
4" P.C.L. Sidewalk
312
6" Drive Approach
255
B. P.C.C. Cross Gutter
0.15
Street Excavation
6,000
Imported Embankment
90,176
Preparation of Subgrade
3,720
11,425
Crushed Aggregate Base (per In. thick)
2.268
A.C. (over 1300 tons)
40.00
A.C. (900 to 1300 tons)
30" RCP (1500 0)
17'
A.C. (under SOD to goo tons)
EA,
A.C. (under $00 tons)
4,000
Patch A.C. (trench)
1
1" thick A.C. Overlay
1,000.00
Adjust sewer manhole to grade
11
Adjust sewer clean out to grade
EA.
Adjust water valves to grade
SC
Street Lights
E
Street Signs
'
L.F.
6.00
23,226
S.F.
1.75
546
S.F.
21SD
638
C.Y.
1.50
91000
S.F.
0.15
13,572
TON
30.00
68,040
EA. 250.00 2,750
EA. 75.00 750
EA. 1,500.00 12,000
EA. 200.00 400
Street Trees
2" x 4' Redwood Header
668
L.F.
1.75
3.30
..569
60
Removal of P.C.C. Curb
1B
435
L.F.
S.F.
2.06
896
Gun ite Lining 3" Thick
G,,nitc Lining !" Thick
12,772
S.F.
2.75
35,123
6- High Chain Link Fence
1,210
L.F.
3.00
25.00
3,720
11,425
18" RCP (1500 D)
457
312
L.F.
L.F.
40.00
12,480
30" RCP (1500 0)
17'
1
EA,
6,000.00
4,000
Catch Basin w +
Local oepression 23'
1
EA.
1,000.00
1,000
outlet Structure Std. 517
2
EA.
1,500.00
3.00
31000
5,637
B" A.C. Berm
1,879
L.F.
(SEE ATTACHED) CONSTRUCTION COST
5218 893
CONTINGENCY
COSTS
521.890
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
$240 783
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SURETY
(100 %)
LABOR AN0 MAfLRIAL SECURITY
(SOX) _
$120.400
1
ENGINEERING INSPECTION
FEE
$ 9,381
MUNV"IENTATION SURETY
(CASH)
S 1.600
-6.
•
0
' ESTIMATE OF COST
PARCEL MAP 7349
3' cone. Gutter 31911 S.F. 3.15 9,461
•
r 1
r-" ^ a I
BcMD W. 106421
—� PHFMIIM: $1,445.00
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and Levis iumem of California
(hereinafter designated as " principal", nave entered into am
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and Complete
certain designated putt is Improvements, which said agreement,
dated Aunumit 14 1983 , and identified as
project arcs Mao is 'nereby referred to and
made a part hereot;and,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, m
THEREFORE, we the pri or ipal and oevmleper'm murance Company
as surety, are held and firmly bound untc the City —07, Rd n=, n 0
Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City'), in the derail Sum of
Two - Hundred Forty Thousand Eight Hundred and no /100-------------- •--- DoTTars
0, aw a I money or Ire Un,ied at_t a, air the payment
Of which sum well and truly to pe made, we bind ourselves, our
IN I r2, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obl igition is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to znd abide by,
and well and truly keep and oerform the covenants, conditions and •
provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof Tads
as therein pr nvi de d, on his or their part, to be kept and
performed at the time and in the manner there,, specified, and in
all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and
shall indemnify and save harmless City• its officers, agents and
employ e S, as therein stipulated, then this obi is at l on Shall
become null and void; otherwise, it Shall be and remain in full
force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to
the face amount Specified therefor, there SIN01 be included casts
and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's
fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation,
all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrgns that no change,
extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci-
fications accompanying the same .mall in anywise affect its
Obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any
such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by
the pr,nr,pal and surety above Tamed, on Augunt 34 ,
1981.
of call rnrn is
(I1pve�n Or1 -
AUTHORIZED AGEAR
riFVtln ^ran msaRVWAS `YyTANY
�Ow -2 y i
i
I' forme y•,n -pact
S tetirin A. Samola
PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS
SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED
{
9@Ia M. 106431 -A
PREMill I,vb=
• LABOR AND MATCRIAL MEN BONN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cud 3monga,
State of California, and a.ev_a Homes of calaf0ania
(hereinafter designated as "principal" — h ave eGterep into a0
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete
certain, designated pub]rt improvements, which said agreement,
dated August 34 198 3 , and identified
as project is hereby -marred t0 and mace
a part herald and
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is
required before entering upon the performance of the work, to
file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho
_dumonga to seCUre the claims to which reference is made in
Title 15 (commencing with Section 30821 of Part 4 of Division 3
of the Civil Code of the State of California.
•
Should the condition of this bond be fully Performed, then
this obi tuati on shall become null and void, otherw Ise at she 11 be
's
and remain in full force and effect.
41 The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,
extension of time, alt -ration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in
any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here-
by waive not Ice of any such change, extension, a'teration or
addition.
IN W1T414g 'AWtofn[ trument has been duly exeruted by
the principal and surety ahove named, on �tigggt 'a _
198 3
taro Ili ne!-n('Ce li (nro i;
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersioned as a
—�> vrT5oer1
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers,
AVTMONIIttl ikEtP
materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the
aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of
Civil Procedure in the sum of
Ool tars ($ 120,400.00), for mater ass rurnisn d or :sop n_r ph of-
any kind, or for amounts due under the Bnemaloyment Insureare art
with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the
same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth,
and also In case suit is brought upon this bond •:ill pay in
addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reas onap le
expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, ineued
by City in successfully enforcing s,ah obiiget!on, to be awarded
and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be
included in the Judgment therein rendered.
•
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 1082) of Part 4 of Oivison 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of aCtiol, to them or their assigns in any suit
brought upon this bond.
•
Should the condition of this bond be fully Performed, then
this obi tuati on shall become null and void, otherw Ise at she 11 be
's
and remain in full force and effect.
41 The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,
extension of time, alt -ration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in
any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here-
by waive not Ice of any such change, extension, a'teration or
addition.
IN W1T414g 'AWtofn[ trument has been duly exeruted by
the principal and surety ahove named, on �tigggt 'a _
198 3
taro Ili ne!-n('Ce li (nro i;
RYt14PLRZ 1tSLtVd'IC:1 <TaTAV1
—�> vrT5oer1
ISw'ctY a" �—
AVTMONIIttl ikEtP
Stodirn A. Spa:molo
PLEASE ATTACII POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS
SI011AtURES MUST BE NOTARIZED
0
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
1977
DATE: August 16, 1983
TO: Harry Empey, Finance Director
FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer A(v
SUBJECT: Release of Subdivision Sign Bonds
For Jones Company.TR 9305/ RC -012
Work for the following tract has been completed and the
garantee bond is hereby authorized by the Planning Depart-
ment for release to:
General Outdoor Advertising
5154 Rivergrade Road
Baldwin Park, California 91706
AMOUNT PURPOSE/
TRACT NO. LOT NO. OF BOND CASE NO. LOCATION
9305 17 $500 70 -20 -400 Sign Bond for
Subdivision Sign
Located on Lot 17 --
Tract 9305
Thank you for your assistance; if you have any questions regarding this
bond release, please call.
GWR /vz
(1.1
E
• RESOLUTION NO. G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCTI, OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOAN TO
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council, in accordance with the provisions
of the California Community Redevelopment Law, has created a
Redevelopment agency Administrative Fund for the purpose of accoun.ing
for administrative expenses of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency and funds advance therefore by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council from time to time desires to loan
funds to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
Section 1 : That an initial loan of $1,500,000 is hereby
appropriated frcm Reserves to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
• Agency Administrative Fund for administrative coats as they
apply to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in accordance
the Agency's approved fiscal budget.
Section 2 : That as increment is received by the Agency, said
increment shall be used to pay off loans from the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Section 3 : That additional loans as required, shall be made to
the Agency inorder that increment received by the Agency shall
be replaced by loan proceeds.
Section 4 : An annual interest rate of 12% will be assessed to
the Redevelopment Agency to be paid to the General Fund Reserves
each thirty days.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983
AYES: t
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M.Wassermin, City Clerk
"I l
0
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983 U
U
LL
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Nooks Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Agreement for professional construction services
for Victoria Planned Community by Hotch Bedrosian, owner of
Runmar Enterprises
Referring to the attached memos, the Engineering Division proposes to hire
contract inspection services in order to meet current inspection demands.
Notch Bedrosian of Runmar Enterprises, has submitted a proposal to provide
inspection services of off -site improvements for the Victoria Planned Commu-
nity Project, see attached Agreement.
Mr. Bedrosian provided professional inspection services at the lowest possi-
ble rates for the Industrial Assessment District 82 -1.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the Agreement and the Mayor execute
the Agreement with Runmar Enterprises to provide inspection services as indi-
cated.
Respectfully submitted,
Attachment
•
9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 12, 1983
TO: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUNECT: CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION NEEDS
As you know, the pace of private construction is increasing tremen-
dously in all areas of land use. As residential projects are attain-
ing their "white reports ", more and more starts are occurring. We
Presently have nearly 500 dwelling starts as of the date of this memo.
The current building inspection staff is only geared for an inspection
Workload of approximately 450 units per year with the balance of com-
mercial and industrial. Adding to the increase in overall need is the
funding of the William Lyon Company Title 10 loan. Staking is in
progress for the first village and under the terns of the loan, con-
struction must begin on the project by August 19, By that date, the
William Lyon Company will begin public improvements in excess of
$20 million. Such an improvement project is twice as long and as
larnp as the largest construction project inspected by the City to
date, the Industrial Assessment District 82 -1. These public improve-
ments will include streets, utilities and massive cast -in -place storm
drains and railroad bridging.
At least one public works inspector is necessary immediately as the
project begins and another when the project progresses. The amount
of construction inspection for this project alone is twice as much
as most cities have in an entire year. WilliamLyon Company will
begin several hundred homes this Fall. Further, Lewis Homes plan
to begin several hundred units this year. These figures are rea-
sonable since the Mortuage Bond money must be utilized as we are
currently beginning the process for a second bond ia,ue. Construc-
tion outside the planned communities is exerting just as much demand.
The requirements for building inspection services will be at least
double its current demand by this Fall tnerefore requiring additional
building inspection services.
As you know, our staff has always maintained a "lean and mead' phi -
losi:hy, as an example, the City of Ontario currently has exactly ,
double the number of building inspectors and public works inspectors
and is Planning to hire more as their construction is also picking
up. Our rate of construction currently exceeds that of Ontario.
/11
August 12, 1983
Construction Inspection Needs
Page Two •
Accoi. :ponying the increase in construction is the increased collection
of permit fees, for instance, within weeks the City will receive ap-
proximately 5450,000 in public works inspection fees alone to cover
the cost of inspection and office work for Victoria's first village.
Building permit fees will be additional.
While I am respectful of the budgetary uncertainties in Sacramento,
I would not be a responsible manager if I do not advise the Council
of what faces us this Fall when inspection needs will outstrip our
ability to respond. The current construction already absorbs our pre-
sent inspection staff. Based upon current trends we have already ex-
ceeded last month's estimate of construction valuation for this calendar
year from $100,000,000 to 5150,000,000 since we broke $100,000,000 in
July without any planned communities permits.
The Community Development Department is also fee based, that is
services must be related to fees. If our services do not reasonably
accommodate private construction needs and yet fee revenues grow, the
City risks having to return excess development fees. We will be in
that position by Fall. The work is here and the fees are here. Please .
advise on this most difficult and sensitive issue.
O" K LAM, —AICP '
Community Devi) pment Director
JL:jk
cc: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
Jerry Grant, Building Official
•
(� (I
•
9
..aa a va ..r ......... .. ..........,...... n4W,--- MEMORA NDUM August 15, 1983 V>
1977
To: city council /J
FRV: Lauren M. Wasserman hV Cw-t -✓
City Manager �/ '
SUBJECT: Temporary Construction
Inspection Help
Jack has outlined a problem which we knew we would have, particularly
at the point when the two planned communities begin construction
activities. We simply cannot provide inspection services to these
two major developments using existing personnel.
It is recommended that in lieu of full time employees, we contrart
for these inspection services until the services are no longer required.
A portion of fees collected have been earmarked for inspection, services.
(Fees exceed costs by a substantial margin).
Unless we hear otherwise from the Council, we will plan to hire contract
services to accomplish the inspection for public works projects. This
will be handled in a manner similar to plan check services and no
Council action is required.
Please contact me if you have questions or would like additional informa-
tion.
LM.l: baa
cc: .lack Lam
Harry Empey
attach.
n
AGREEMENT .
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
1983 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, hereinafter referred to as CITY and Hotch Bedrosian doing business
as RUNMAR ENTERPRISES with the principal place of business at 7 Park Vista,
Irvine, California 92714, hereinafter referred to as CONTRACTOR.
WHEREAS, CITY is involved in the Victoria Planned Community
develcpment which requires professsional construction inspection services; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain the services of an experienced and
qualified contractor to provide professional construction inspection services
in the area of storm drain construction and street improvement construction;
and
WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR represents itself as qualified and capable of •
rendering the required services;
NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the premises, the parties hereto
agrees as follows:
ARTICLE I: SCOPE OF SERVICES
CONTRACTOR agraes to provide technical services as requested by CITY
for inspection of a public works construction project. Such services may
include:
a, Professional inspection of storm drain construction and street
improvement construction;
b. Preparation and maintenance of field records, diaries and as-
built notations on project plans;
C. Preparation of material samples for testing;
-1- 0
�n
• d. Preparation of weekly and monthly progress reports; and
e Completion of related work as requested by the CITY.
ARTICLE It: DUTIES OF CITY
CITY agrees to provide CONTRACTOR with such information as is
possessed by CITY and is normally supplied to contractors performing such
services.
ARTICLE III: COMPENSATION
CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR for services faithfully rendered
hereunder.
Such payment shall be made at the rate of $25.00 per hour for the
principal inspector and $20.00 per hour for an assistant inspector, based upon
the number of hours actually spent on inspection and related duties, excluding
• travel time to and from the construction site.
CITY agrees to compensate CONTRACTOR for a minimum of four hours
(tlnn) for each day the inspection work is performed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to
this Agreement.
10
Upon prior approval by CITY, CONTRACTOR may be reimbursed for out -of-
pocket expenses incurred in the performance of this Agreement. CITY and
CONTRACTOR agree with regard to any such reimbursement as follows:
a. CONTRACTOR shall not be entitled to reimbursement for any costs
of transportation, insurance, taxes or other benefits.
ARTICLE IV: PERSONNEL
CONTRACTOR agrees that Mr. Hotch Bedrosian shall he responsible for
providing the services to be performed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this
Agreement.
-2-
0
ARTICLE V: NO AGENCY RELATIONSHIP
No Agency relationship between CITY and CONTRACTOR is intended or
created by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR is not authorized and shall not at any
time or in any manner represent that it is an agent, service, or employee of
CITY, it being expressely understood that CONTRACTOR is an at all times shall
remain a wholy independent contractor.
ARTICLE VI: TIME OF PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR shall be available for performance of Scope of Services as
of the effective date of this Agreement an entered above and continue to
perform such services for a minimum of 12 months from said date or until the
project is completed. CONTRACTOR'S services shall be provided upon CITY'S
request and completed in such sequences as to assure expeditious completion of •
the public works construction projects to which CONTRACTOR is assigned.
ARTICLE VII: TERMINATION
This Agreement shall terminate on or upon completion of the Scope of
Services described in Article I or earlier at the CITY'S option, provided that
CITY shall give CONTRACTOR ten days written notice of such termination. In
the event of termination by CITY, CONTRACTOR shall deliver to CITY all
documents, files and records pertaining to any work which may be in progress
and CITY shall pay to CONTRACTOR all sums due to the date of termination.
ARTICLE VIII: NOTICES
Any notice given pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed received
and effective when properly addressed, posted and deposited in the United
States Mail addressed to the respective parties as follows:
-3- •
• CITY: 9320 Base Line Road
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
CONTRACTOR: 7 Park Vista
Irvine, CA 92714
ARTICLE IX: NON- ASSIGNABILITY
CONTRACTOR shall not assign any interest in this Agreement and shall
not transfer any interest in the same without prior written approval of CITY.
ARTICLE X: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNTY
CONTRACTOR agrees that during the performance of this Agreement, it
will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because
of race, creed, color, sex, age or national origin.
• ARTICLE XI: AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS
No change, amendment or modification to this Agreement shall be
effective unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto.
ARTICLE XII: ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement and any agreement, document or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein, integrate all the terms and conditions mentioned
herein or incidental hereto, and supersede all oral negotiations and prior
writings with respect with the subject matter hereof. In the event of any
conflict between the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement any
such agreement, document or instrument, the terms, conditions and provisions
of the Agreement shall prevail.
41
-4-
jb�?
4
ARTICLE XIII: APPLICABLE LAW •
This agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of
the State of California.
ARTICLE XIV: COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in as many counterparts as may be
deemed convenient, each of which, when so executed, shall be original.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONTRACTOR have executed this Agreement
as of the date first above written.
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City C er
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
5-
RUNMAR ENTERPRISES
to c e rosian, wne�
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Jon Mikels, Mayor
A
•
August 22, 1983
Mr. Monte Prescher
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 C Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Prescher,
As per our conversation on Thursday, August 11, 1983 I am pleased to
submit this letter proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to pro-
vide professional Engineering Inspection Services for the Victoria
Project and other City projects.
As a Resident Engineering Inspector I will be responsible for field
control and inspection of the contractor's activities with regard to
compliance with plans, specifications, special provisions, and con-
tract requirements for this project; and for the coordination of the
activities of field lab services and any other special inspections
that may need to be perfc ^ed.
I will also be responsible to insure that proper materials and con -
strurticn processes are used in the work; prepare material samples for
testing, review and determine pay quantities for work performed as a
• basis for monthly papmenta to the contractor, I will also record as-
built construction data, project diary, weekly and monthly project re-
Ports.
I will provide, es an independent contractor, inspection for the com-
p.et.ion of the construction of the Victoria Project for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
My fee for the services, based on a minimum eight, hour work day, will
be calculated on the number of hours spent on inspection multiplied
by the hourly rate of $25,00. Invoices will be submitted to the City
of Hancho Cucamonga for verification and approval.
Due to the sine and scope of this project it will be necessary to
place another Inspector on the project for a period of nine months at
the. rate of $20.00 Per hour,
The upcominr Victoria Proj,;ct is an eighteen month project which consists
of approxic.a'.ely 4,320 working hours of Inspeet.ien. This includes the
secrnd Inspector for nine months as needed. This project should not
exceed $1111,000 for Inspection services.
My services include transportation, all Insurances, benefits and taxes,
Pleare find attached a copy of a sample agreement.
Ret,perh ,n rf .
ll Y�o- _L ours,
r!rosxan
7 Park Vista
Irvine, CA 92714
(N�
r�
C7
7
The Army Corps of Engineers has requested some very minor word changes in the
contract for Recreation Development at Cucamonga /Demens Channels. These
changes in no way affect the contract itself, but are merely a bit of
"housoteeping" with which the Corps feels they will be more comfortable.
The first change is in the 6th "WHEREAS ", page 1. The word 'Government"
(first sentence) has been deleted, as the City's agreement is with multiple
pArties in acquiring rights of way, easements, etc.
The second change is in Article 2, paragraph c, page 2. This is a minor word
ehanne to define Exhibit "A ".
HH /mw
to(,
A,1
VL11 Va 1"Aa�VaaV vv vail.lV ♦. Vaa
CVV..,11�
MEMORANDUM��'
Date;
September 1,
1983
_ L i
To:
City council
and City Manager
ig„
From:
Bill Holley,
Director, Community Services Department
Subject:
Minor Contract Modifications - Consent Calendar 9/1/83
The Army Corps of Engineers has requested some very minor word changes in the
contract for Recreation Development at Cucamonga /Demens Channels. These
changes in no way affect the contract itself, but are merely a bit of
"housoteeping" with which the Corps feels they will be more comfortable.
The first change is in the 6th "WHEREAS ", page 1. The word 'Government"
(first sentence) has been deleted, as the City's agreement is with multiple
pArties in acquiring rights of way, easements, etc.
The second change is in Article 2, paragraph c, page 2. This is a minor word
ehanne to define Exhibit "A ".
HH /mw
to(,
A,1
• CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AND THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
for
RECREATION DEVELOPMENT
at the
CUCAMONGA CREEK AND DEMENS CREEK CHANNELS,
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
THIS CONTRACT entered into this 20th day of July, by and between the
UNITFD S'IATI'S OF AMERICA (hereinafter called the "Government "), represented by
the Contracting Officer executing this Contract and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter called the "City ").
Wr7NHSSfTH THAT:
WHEPEA.4, construction of the Cucamonga Creek and Denens Creek channels,
ran B "rnardino County, California (hereinafter called the "Project ") was
auih�rized by Act of Congress, Flood Control Act of 1968, Public Law 90 -483,
90th Congress, 2nd session, approved on 13 August, 1968; and
W'IFRF.AS, recreational development at the project was authorized by
Puhlia Law 543, 78th Congress, as amended and was included as a post
• au r'noriza ti on change of 12 May, 7976; and
WRFREAS, the City is authorized to administer project land and water
anus for recreational purposes, and operate, maintain and replace facilities
pr•:•1 c: ^d for such purposes and is empowered to contract for such purposes, and
is -n:. • red to contract in these respects; and
WHEC EA.9, the City has the authority and capability to arrange for the
non- Frdoral coupxration required by the Federal legislation authorizing the
r,•nreation foatpres of the project and by their applicable law; and
WHF,REAS, the Government is authorized by Section 207 of the 1962 Flood
^, .tro1 Art, as amended, (16 O.S.C. 406 d) to make contracts with non - Federal
bodies far developments management and administration of the recreation
r.r;ourcos of Federal water resourcos projects; and
wiii,p'•1n, thn City is required by separate, agreement to acquire use
rig ?I r.; ill lands, easr•men LS, and riehls -of=day tv- ,.scary for the construction
"I flor,i rnntrol foatures of tho project upon which the subject
YerreAtr Vldl fnatnrns will 1151) he cOnitr•.Icterl; and
wHCUF:AR, the recreational development at Federal nonreservoir water
r.a uur rn:: :molects nhall h" in arconl.mce with the root- sharinq provisions in
the 'r'n.!n sal water ResnnrCna Prnlert Rocr„ation Art of 1965 (Public Law 89 -72),
N ^'d, TIIFREF'URR, the parties egroc as follows:
-1-
/' ') '1
ARTICLE 1
- DEFINITION OF TERMS. For the purpose of this contract certain
• terms are defined
as follows:
a)
First costs, used interchangeable with the terms "capital costs"
and "project costs ", is the initial capital recreation cost of
the project, including engineering, design and supervision, and
administrative costs.
b)
Recreation lands: Project lands acquired primarily for
recreational purposes, excluding lands needed for flood control
or other Project purposes.
c)
Recreational facilities: Those facilities for recreation which
may be installed pursuant to this agreement.
ARTICLE _
LANDS AND FACILITIES.
a)
The City will secure use of any additional lands outside the
boundary of the flood control features necessary for recreation,
access, health and safety.
h)
The Governce.n.t agrees to design and construct the recreation
features of the Project to provide for optimum enhancement of
general recreation consistent with other authorized Project
purposes. Details on lands and facilities necessary for such
•
enhancement will he shown in the Feature Design Memorandum.
ci
The Government, in cooperation with the City, will prepare a
mutually acceptable Feature Design Memorandum which will depict
and identify the types and quantities of facilities which the
Government and the City will construct in accordance with this
contract. The full cost of facilities to he so provided, is
estimated at $570,000.00. The presently estimated cost of
facilities to be provided is contained in Exhihit A entitled
"Rstirtated Recreation First Costs" attached hereto and made a
part hereof. Such estimate of facility cost is subject to
reasonable adjustment as appropriate upon completion of
^onstniction and approval of the above- mentioned Feature Design
M «morandum.
d) The facilities shown in Exhihit A, an it may be adjusted in
accordance with Paragraph c) above, shall be constructed jointly
by the parties through mutually satisfactory diviaion of
rpsponsihilitj for construction, which takes into account direct
.ind indirect cost savings that may be gain -d by the parties in
the public inb +rest For certain spoci Fir facilities, providrd)
that, the far,ilities to he constructed by each party shall be
formally agrcpd upon by th•• two parties prior to construction,
wonsistrnt with the provisions of Article 3.
rl Title to all lands anqu,red by or with Government assistance
specifically to enhance the recreation potential of the project,
and title to all recreation facilities constructed on such
)ands, shall at all times be in the United Staten.
-z'
�n�
Title to all lands acquired by or with Government assistance for
other authorized project purposes, and title to all recreation •
facilities constructed on such lands, shall at all times be in
public ownership.
f) The performance of any obligation or the expenditure of any
funds by the Government under this contract is contingent upon
Congress making the necessary appropriations and funds being
allocated and made available for the work required hereunder.
ARTICLF 3 - CONSIDERATION AND PAYMENT. Each party hereto will pay or
contribute in kind fifty percent (50%) of the first separable costs of
recreation development and fifty percent (50%) of the separable cost of future
development.
A) Initial Development. Fifty percent (50a) of the estimated
separable first costs of initial recreation development is
estimated to be $285,000.00. Before advertisement of the first
construction contract hereunder and again before advertisement
of each subsequent construction contract thereafter, the
Government Contracting Officer shall calculate the estimated
expenditure which the Government and the City shall have made
through the end of such contract. If the total estimated
expenditures by the government shall exceed those of the City,
the City shall pay to the Government such sum as will equalize
the expenditures of both parties before award of such contract
in computing expenditures, there shall be considered, in •
addition to cash expenditures, contributions in kind such as
:and and facilities, at the fair market value thereof at the
time r•r` land and facilities are provided by the City, which
value shall not include enhancement due to the Project. upon
completion of initial recreation development, an adjustment will
be made on the basis of actual costs incurred. It is understood
and agreed that the City's share of the cost of each
construction contract shall he computed on the basis of actual
costs to the Government of the work included in the Government
construction contracts above and on the basis of unit prices in
each Government contract and final quantities covering labor,
materials, and equipment required for the work under each
vernment's constructional, engineering and overhead expense
and not on the basis of previous estimates.
b) Future Development. Neither the Government nor the City is
oL]ina red by Uu s contract to undertake any future recreation
dnvlluprent of the project, except to the extend this contract
may be so modified by future supplemental agreement signed by
All parties and approved by the Secretary of the Army or his
authorizer) representative. If at any time the City wishes to
undertake further developnent of the facilities hereunder, it
nay do so at its expense provided prior approval of the
Contracting Officer is obtained, but the Government shall not be
obligated to reimburse the City for any portion of such expense •
in the ahsence of a ,upplo.mental agreement hereto as aforesaid.
.g-
i�7
• c) Other Federal Funds. No repayment credit of any kind whatsoever
Will be allowed the City for expenditures financed by,
involving, or consisting of, either in whole or in part,
contributions or grants of assistance received from any Federal
agency, except HUD block grants, in providing any lands or
facilities for recreation enhancement hereunder.
d) Adjustment to Reflect Costs. The dollar amounts see forth in
this Article are based on the Government's best estimates, and
are subject to adjust ;cents based on the costs actually incurred.
Such estimates are not to be construed as representations of the
total financial responsibilities of each of the parties.
ARTICLE 4 - CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES.
Certain types of facilities including, but not necessarily limited to,
reste,:rints, lodges, golf courses, cabins, clubhouses, overnight or vacaiion
tyFe structures, stables, marinas, swimming pools, commissaries, chair- lifts,
a.! such sir ,.lar revenue - producing facilities may be constructed by the City
or thirl parties and may be operated by the City or third parties as
conceasions. Any such construction and operation of these types of faciliti •.s
5 a;l he "rpatihle with all project purposes and shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Contracting Officer. However, the City shall not
r•cei yr credit for costs of such facilities against amounts due and payahle
un.! ^r Article 3.
e A ?PICLF 5 - Fr ES AND CHARGES. The City may assess and collect fees for
^ntrac n to developed recreation areas and for use of the recreation project
and areas, in accordance with a fee schedule mutually agreed to by
Yhv Governrent and the City. Not loss often than every fiae (5) years, said
:w rti ^•; '.+ill review such schedule and upon the request of either, re- negotiate
t'^.^ v-h e.l ale. The re- neqotiated fee schedule shall, upon written agreement
„n,r ^t, by t'n2 parties, supersede prior schedules without the necessity of
..lyinq this contractaal document.
ARTICLE. n - FEDERAL AND STA F. LAWS.
a) In acting under its rights and obligations hereunder, the City
agrees to comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and
regulations, including by not limited to the provisions of the
Davis.-Pacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276 a -a (7)); the Contract work House
and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C, 327 -333); and part 3 of
Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations,
b) The City furnishes, as part of this contract, an assurance
(Exhlhit H) that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil,
vlghts Act of 1964 (78 Stat, 241, 42 U.S.C. 2000 d, et sec) and
f^parr,wnt of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto
and puhlis'lcd ir. Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal
Fegulations. The City agrees also that it will obtain such
aavnrances from all its conces ,ionaires.
r) The City furnishes, as part of this contract, its assurance that
it will comply with Section 210 and 305 of the Uniform
Relocation Assistance And Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 (Public Law 91 -646).
-4.
I; �
ARTICLE 7 - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. The City shall provide for the •
operations, maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government of all
facilities developed to support project recreation opportunities. The City
shall provide for the maintenance of all project lands, waters, and facilities
to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer.
ARTICLE. Q - RELEASE OF CLAIMS. The Government and its officers and employees
shall not be liable in any manner to the City for or on account of damage
caused by the development, operation and maintenance of the recreation
facilities of the Project. The City hereby releases the Government and agrees
to hold it free and harmless and to indemnify it from all damages, claims or
denaods that may result from development, operation and maintenance of the
recreation areas and facilities.
A ?TICL° 9 - TRANSFER OF A= SIGNMENT. The City shall not transfer or assign
ti)is contract nor any rights acquired thereunder, nor grant any interest,
privi'•:ge or license vAatsoevet in connection with this contract without the
approval of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative except
as provided in Article 6 of this contract.
ARTICLE 10 - DEFAULT. In the event the City fails to meet any of its
obiigntiens under this agreenent, the Government may terminate the whole or
any part of this contract. The rights and remedies of the Government provided
in Uis Article shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights
and re,viies provided by law or under this contract.
APTICLF 11 - EXAMINATION OF RECORDS. The Government and the City shall •
nai n'ain boo};,, � -ecords, documents, and other evidence pertaining to cost= and
exeeus�• 1n-vrrP1 under this contract, to the extent and in such detail as will
pr >ner:y reflect all net costs, direct and indirect, of labor, materials,
equip: rent, supplies, and services and other costs and expenses of whatever
nature involved herein. The Government and the City shall make available at
their offices at reasonahle tines, the accounting records for inspection and
audit by an authorized representative of the parties to this contract during
the period this contract is in effect.
ARTICLE; 12 - RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. The parties to this contract act in an
inl�penient capacity in the performance of their respective functions under
this contract and neither party is to be considered the officer, agent, or
- mployee of the other.
APTICLF 13 - INSPF!)TION. The Government shall at all times have. the right to
ir, ;pc r.tiens concerning the operation and maintenance of the lands and
fnr.ilitlry to he provided hereunder.
ARTICLE 1.1 - OFFICIALS NOT TO PENEFIT. No member of or delegate to the
Congress, or eesident Commi sinner, shall be admitted to any share or part of
this centred, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom; hot this provision
shall not. b, construed to extend to this contract if madp With a corporation
for 1 t p,neral benefit.
-5- •
• IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this contract as of the
day and year first above written.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Cr
By
c
Colonel, Corps of Engineers Mayor Pro Tem, tharJes J. Buqu
Copra nding Contracting Officer City of Rancho Cucamonga
Date Date 7-�1�F3
APPROVED:
By
Deputy Copra "der, ASACE
Authorized Representative
Secretary of the Army
Da
•
9
6
)17)
ATTEST y /y
BY�
C Clerk
et II
APPROVED:
By
Deputy Copra "der, ASACE
Authorized Representative
Secretary of the Army
Da
•
9
6
)17)
ATTEST y /y
BY�
C Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I, Rohert F. Dougherty, as Attorney for the City of Rancho Cucamonea, State of
California, hereby certify that the foregoing agreenent executed by Jon D.
Mik: ls, Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is within the scope of his
authority, and that in my capacity as Chief Legal Officer for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, I have considered thp legal effects of Section 221 of the
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962 -56) and find that the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, State of California, is legally and financially capable of entering
into the contractual obligations obtained in the foregoing agreement and that,
upon acceptance, it will be legally enforceable.
Given under my hand, this f-
day of(,i 1903.
/or
City Attorney
City of Rancho Cucamonga
I3
•
. ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECTIVE
UNDER TITLE VI OF CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "Applicant - Recipient ")
HEREBY AGREES THAT it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (P.L. 88 -35) and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the
Department of Defense Directive 5500.11, December 28, 1964 issued pursuant to
that title, to the end that, in accordance with title VI of that Act and the
Di- ective, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color,
sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, he denied the
benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or
activity for which the Applicant- Recipient receives Federal financial
assistance from the Department of the Army, and HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it
will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.
If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid
of Federal financial assistance extended to the Applicant- Recipient by the
Department of the Army, assurance shall obligate the Applicant- Recipeinl:, in
the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period
during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose involving
the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is so
provided, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant- Recipient for the period
during which it retains ownership or possession of the property. In all other
cases, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant- Recipient for the period
• during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to it by the
Deoa rtment of the Army.
THIS ASS11R.ANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining
any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other
Federal financial assistance extended after the date thereof to the
Applicant- Recipient by the Deparment, including installment payments after
such date on account of arrangements for Federal financial assistance which
were approved before such date. The Applicant- Recipient recognizes and agrees
that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in reliance on the
representations and agreements made in this assurance, and the Uri tal States
have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this assurance. This assurance
is binding or. the Applicant - Recipient, its successors, transferees, and
assignees and the person or persons whose signatures appear below are
authorized
^ { to sign this assurance on behalf of the Applicant- Recipient.
R'�- `IFS._ Charles J. 8ucuet II
Jon U1Rels, May Mayor Pro Tom)
July 11, 1983
EXHIBIT R
1io
1,
0
•
I*
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983 U i
1
TO: City Council and Gity Manager �
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Annual Supplementary and Emergency Contract Renewal
with Laird Construction
As provided for in the agreement, the subject contract may be extended at
the City's option provided any unit cost adjustments do not exceed certain
restricting factors.
The contractor has submitted a proposal for extending the subject contract.
The bulk of the items, Items 1 through 11 which include A.C., Berm, Aggregate
Base placement and A.L. removals, remain unchanged. Equipment rental has
increased ap average of 1/2 of 1 %. Labor only has increased an average of
4 %. The above increases are within the range of allowable adjustments. The
contractor has satisfactorily responded and performed under the terms of the
contract during the past contract period.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council accept Laird Construction Co.'s proposal,
approve extension of the contract and execute agreement of Annual Contract
for City -Wide Supplementary Maintenance, Clean -up and Emergency Street Repair
with Laird Construction Company, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
Attachments
I( S
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 8th day of�Se tteem�ber� 19 83
by and between The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Muni cipal pal—Co tion, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, hereinafter called the City, and
Laird Construction Co., Inc.
hereinafter called the Contractor.
WITNESSETH:
FIRST: That the Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City herein-
after set forth, hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, and labor necessary
to perform and complete, and to faithfully perform and complete, in z good and
workmanlike manner, the several items of work described hereinbefore in these
Contract Documents, all in accordance with the plans and specifications, Standard
Drawings of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Said plans and specifications, and
the proposal of the Contractor, which is also on file in the office of the City
Engineer of said City, are hereby referred to and made a part of this contract
in like manner and with the same force and effect as if incorporated herein.
SECOND: That it is further agreed that said tools, equipment, and labor shall
be furnished and said work performed and completed within the time as required
• or indicated by said plans and specifications, under the direction and to the
satisfaction of the said City Engineer, and the Contractor hereby expressly
agrees to meet, observe, perform and follow every term and requirement of said
specifications.
•
THIRD: That it is further agreed that in the event said Contractor fails to
furnish tools, equipment, or labor in the necessary quantity or quality, or
fails to prosecute the work or any part thereof contemplated by this contract
in a diligent and workmanlike manner, the City Engineer shall make verbal or
written demand upon the contractor. If said Contractor after receipt of demand
from the City Engineer so to do, fails to furnish tools, equipment or labor
in the necessary quantitiy or quality, and to prosecute said work and all parts
thereof in a dilignet and workmanlike manner, or after commencing so to do
within the time specified by the City Engineer fails to continue so to do,
within time specified, then the City may exclude the Contractor from the premises
or any portion thereof, and take possession of said premises or complete the
work contemplated by this contract or any portion of said work, either by
furnishing the tolls, equipment, labor or material necessary therefore, or by
letting the unfinished portion of said work, or the portion taken over by the
City to another Contractor, or by a combination of such methods. In any event,
the procuring of the completion of said work, or the portiou thereof taken over
by the City, shall be a charge against the Contractor, and may be deducted from
any money due or becoming due him from the City, or the Contractor may be compelled
to pay the City the amount of said charge, or the portion thereof unsatisfied.
I
F -1
FOURTH: That the Contractor agrees to begin the work of construction contem-
plated and provided for in this contract within:
Emercency Conditions: 2 (two) hours when specified as such by the City Engineer.
Urgent Conditions: 48 hours when specified as such by the City Engineer. •
Norma Coral ditions: 10 days after receipt by contractor of written notification
by the City Engineer to proceed with work.
FIFTH: Time is declared to be of the essence of this contract, and should the
Contractor fail to complete'the work required to be done hereunder, on or before
the time of completion herein stipulated, together with such additional time
as the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may grant said Contractor
for cause, it is mutually understood and agreed between the City and the Con-
tractor that the City may exclude the Contractor from the premises, or any
portion thereof, together with all materials and equipment thereon, and may
compelte the work contemplated by this contract in the manner provided in
paragraph "THIRD" hereof, and with like force and effect as if the Contractor
had failed to prosecute the work in a diligent and workmanlike manner. It is
further mutually agreed, by and between the parties hereto, including the surety
or sureties on the bond attachi.d to this contract, that in the event additional
time is granted said Contractor within which the work required hereunder may be
completed, such extension or extensions shall not affect the validity of this
contract or release said surety or sureties on the bonds given in connection
therewith.
SIXTH: That the Contractor agrees to save, keep and bear harmless the City and
its officers and agents from all damages, costs or expenses in law or equity
that may at any time arise or be set up because of any infringement or alleged
infringement of the patent rights of any person, firm, or corporation in con-
sequence of the use in or about said work of any article or material supplied •
or installed under this contract, which article or material was fuenished by
the Contractor.
SEVENTH: That it is further agreed that the City shall not be held liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening to the works referred
to in this contract prior to the completion and acceptance of the same.
EIGHTH: The Notice Inviting Bids, the Instruction to Bidders, and the Proposal
are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement.,
NINTH: That the City agrees, in consideration of the performance of this
contract, to pay to contractor as follows:
The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer Labor and Material
Lien Releases and a written estimate of the total amount of
work done. The City Engineer will review the estimate and lien
releases and approve it or notify the Contractor of any exception.
The Cityshall upon acceptance by the City Council and after
deducting all previous payments and all sums to be kept or ,
retained under the provisions of this contract, issue payment to
the Contractor. No such payment or estimate shall be required
to be nade when in the judgement of the Engineer the work is not
proceeding in accordance with provisions of the contract. No
such estimate or payment shall be construed to be an acceptance
of any defective work or improper materials. •
F -2
1 1 -1
The Contractor shall be paid the total contract price in
accordance with the payment processing of the City. It is
understood that any delay in the preparation approval and
payment of these demands will not constitute a breach of
contract on the City.
TPITH: It is further understood and agreed between the parties hereto as
follows:
1. That the quantities are unknown and that all of the work contemplated
by this contract must be completed in all respects in accordance with
the plans and specifications hereinbefore mentioned, whether the
quantities of materials required or the work and labor to be preformed
are greater or less than anticipated.
2. That the Contractor shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or other-
wise dispose of this contract, or of his right, title, or interest in or
to the same or any part thereof, without the previous consent in writing
of the City Council. If the Contractor shall, without such previous
written consent, assign, transfer, convey, submlet or otherwise dispose
of this contract, or of his right, title or interest therein, or lose
or be deprived of the same by operation of the bankruptcy laws or
insolvency laws, or in any other manner whatsoever, then and in any
such event this contract may be revoked and annulled by the City Council
at their option and in their absolute discretion, and if so revoked or
annulled, the City shall thereupon be relieved and discharged from any
and all liabilities and obligations arising out of the same to the
Contractor and /or his assignee, trustee or transferee; and no right shall
be acquired by any such assignee, trustee or transferee, cr any one claiming
under them or any of them, either at law or in equity, to make or assert
any claim or demand whatever against the City, whether for monies due or
to become due under this contract, or otherwise whosoever. "
3. That the words "City Council ", "Engineer ", or "City Engineer ", and
"Contractor ", when used in this contract, and /or the bonds accomoanvinq
the same, have the same meanino as when said words, or anv of them, are
used in the plans and specifications for the work herein mentioned and
described, as said words are defined in said specifications.
4, Tnat this contract shall be binding upon the City, its successors or
assigns, and upon the Contractor, his executors, administrators, successors
or assigns.
FLE'l E!l)C That the Contractor agrees, pursuant to the provisions of the
Labor Code of the State of California, to pay not less than the general pre-
vailino rate of per diem wages and not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for legal holidays and overtime work, for each craft
or type of workman needed to execute the work under this agreement, as
asr "nrtained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, said provisions to be applicable
to ray for all workmen employed either by the Contractor or by any sub-
contractors doing or contracting to do, any work under this agreement. Said
rate and scale are on file at the City Offices, and copies may be obtained.
F -3
I<
TWELFTH: This Contract shall be for a period of nine (9) months commencing
on the 12th day of October, 1981, and ending the 30th day of June, 1982,
unless terminated or extended as herein provided. The City reserves the right
of option to extend this contract from year to year commencing on the first (111
day of July of each fiscal year. In no event shall this contract be extended
beyond the 30th day of June, 1986.
THIRTEENTH: In the event this contract be extended, compensation shall be
as defined Paragraph "NINTH" adjusted as follows:
The City reserves the right to negotiate adjustment of unit cost with the con-
tractor at the beginning of each fiscal year. the unit cost shall not be
adjusted in excess of the change in consumer price index for the Los Angeles -
Long Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area as calculated from April 1st through
March 31st of the previous fiscal year. EXCEPT as determined by the City
Engineer as follows:
Where labor benefits are increased in the contractors labor agreement /contract
in excess of the index and /or where prevailing wages are increased in current
publication of the CalTrans General Prevailing Wade Rates in excess of the index
and /or where material cost are increased uniformly in the area commonly known
as the Blest -End, San Bernardino County, in excess of the index and /or where
equipment rental rates are increased uniformly within the sphere of the City
in excess of the index.
Adjusted cost shall be effective July 1st of each successive fiscal year through
the term of the contract unless terminated as provided herein. If the index is •
discontinued or revised during the tern such other governmental index or
computation with which it is replaced shall be used in order to obtain sub-
stantially the same result as would be obtained if the index had not be dis-
continued or revised.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said City of Rancho Cucamonga has, by order of its
City Council caused these presents to be subscribed by the Mayor and the
Seal of said City to be affixed and attested by the City Clerk, and the said
Contractor has subscribed his name hereto the day and year first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
8y. --
Mayor of the City o` Rancho Cucamonga
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACTOR:
Apprnved as to form and execution •
City Attorney, City of Rancho Cucamonga
F -A , q
`• CONTRACT PROPOSAL
EMERGNECY AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA:
• The undersigned bidder declares that tie has carefully examined the location of the proposed
work, that he has examined the plans, special provisions and specifications, and read the
accompanying instruction to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this proposal is
accepted, to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work
in accordance with the Plans, Special Provisions and Specifications, in the time and manner
therein prescribed for the unit cost and lump sum amounts set forth in the schedule on the
following proposal.
M
ITEM
1. ASPHALT CONCRETE REPLACEMENT - TRENCH REPAIR, POTHOLES, ETC.
(Does not Include removal. See Item 3)
Item I TOTAL DOWN
ITEM
2, ASPHALT CONCRETE PLACEMENT - SHOULDER /TRANSISION PAVING OVER EXISTING
PREPARED SUB -GRADE
AREA AND PRICE IN SQUARE FEET
THICKNESS
0- 50
51 -150
151 -500
501 -1010
1001 -2000
2001 -5000
50010 000
ACROSS
0 -50
4.84
).39
2.27
2.i7
1.83
1.51
1.24
4"
33'
5.03
3.57
2.45
2.15
2.02
1.72
1.42
1
Sri
. 42'
5.21
3.76
2.64
2.64
2.20
1.91
1.61
i
6' .S'
- 5.39
3.93
2.80
2.00
2.37
2.08
1.78
5.03
3.57
2.15
2.45
2.02
L72
1.42
S
i
.A2'
i
Item I TOTAL DOWN
ITEM
2, ASPHALT CONCRETE PLACEMENT - SHOULDER /TRANSISION PAVING OVER EXISTING
PREPARED SUB -GRADE
Item 2 TOTAL DOWN
G1 _
1"l C1, _
AREA AND PRICE IN SQUARE FEET
THICKNESS
Soul-
TOTAL
0 -50
51 -150
:Il - 500
501 -1 nnu
l0ui -2 Ono
2n0i -5000 0 0, 000
ACROSS
3
,25-
4.84
3.79
2.27
2 .27
1.83
1.51
1.24
A
•33'
5.03
3.57
2.15
2.45
2.02
L72
1.42
S
.A2'
5.21
3.76
?.6A
2.61
2.20
6
,$'
5139
3.93
2.80
2.81
1.37
2.08
1.i8
Item 2 TOTAL DOWN
G1 _
1"l C1, _
CONTRACT ITEMS
ITEM •
3• ASPHALT CONCRETE REMOVAL - INCLUDES CUTTING AND DISPOSAL
Item 3 TOTAL DOWN I I I
ITEM
4. b 5.ASPHALT CONCRETE SKIN PATCH OVERLAY HAND 6 EQUIPMENT WORK
AREA AND
PRICE. IN SQUARE FEET,
THICKNESS
0- 5o
51 -150
151- 500
501 -1000
1001 -2000
2001 -5000
5 0-
9a,000
ACROSS
1.90
1.90
1.17
0.45
. 20'
6,96
I/.08
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.28
0.57
�
Item 6 TOTAL DOWN
/
I} "/•13"
2,11
3 "/•25'
5 -56
1.85
1 -11
O.SF,
0.42
0.25
0.25
2.25
4 "/•33'.
5.56
1.85
1.11
0.56
0.42
0.25
0.25
2.38
5 "/.42'
5.56
1.85
1.24
0.62
0.49
v.31
0 -31
5.56
I.85
1.24
0.62
0.49
0.31
0.31
Item 3 TOTAL DOWN I I I
ITEM
4. b 5.ASPHALT CONCRETE SKIN PATCH OVERLAY HAND 6 EQUIPMENT WORK
•
C -2
R
AREA AND PRICE IN SQUARE FEET
THICKNE551
0- 50
0 -150
151-500
500 -1000
SUOn' �O��fAL
.I S'
_
2.44
1.90
1.90
1.90
1.17
0.45
. 20'
6,96
I/.08
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.28
0.57
�
Item 6 TOTAL DOWN
/
I} "/•13"
2,11
2.11
1.60
0.92
2 " /,17
2.25
2.25
1.71
0.97
2 } "/.21"
2.38
1 2.36
1.62
1.03,
'
ITEM Item 4 and 5 TOTAL DOWN
•
C -2
R
0- SJ
'.L -15U
LI`-500
591 -1000
'1001 -2oUU
2001 -.S OGO
SUOn' �O��fAL
.I S'
h.05
2.44
0.98
0.61
0.64
0.45
0.45
. 20'
6,96
2.61
LOy
0.75
0.75
0.5J
0.57
�
Item 6 TOTAL DOWN
�
•
C -2
R
•
J
•
j, ASPHALT CONCRETE PAV11 NICHINE OVERLAY - PRICE SHOWN '� *OR ONE LINEAR FOOT BY 10
FEET WIDE (10 SQ. FT. )�1 INCH THICK
8. EXCAVATION - INCLUDES REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL MATERIAL AND SUB -GRADE PREP.
AREA AND PRICE IN SQUARE FEET
E" rnnT
0- 1000
1001-2 o0
2001 -5000
5000 -10,00
1001 -2000
- ,
10000
TOTAL
AL ROSS
4.10
3.07
2.74
2.61
1
1.93
0.64
Item 7 TOTAL DOWN
)
8. EXCAVATION - INCLUDES REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL MATERIAL AND SUB -GRADE PREP.
AREA
AREA AND PRICE IN SQUARE FEET
THICKNESS
0- 50
51 -150
151 -500
510 -1000
1001 -2000
2001 -500
5000-10,00
TOTAL
3"
•25-
6.43
4.27
2.58
1.93
0.64
0.27
0.21
Item 10 TOTAL DOWN
6.43
4.27
2.58
1.91
0.67
0.30
6"
•42'
6.43
4.27
2.58
1.97
0.68
.51
1 6.43
4.27
2.58
2.12
.58'
6.43
4.27
2.58
2.12
8,
66'
USE EQ
IPMENT RENTAL
FOR E%
AVATIONS
;REATER
1
75,
THAN I
IDICATED IN
ITEM 8
lo"
12"
9. ASPHALT CONCRETE BERM PLACEMENT - PER CITY STANDARD J313 Item 8 TOTAL DOWN
PRICE
PPR IINFAR FOOT
0-20
51--f 51 -150
151 -500
501 -10,J0
1001 -2000
001 -5000
500 000
AL ROSS
IRA
6.13
4.94 3.71
3.71
3.52
3.28
3.03
2.64
Item 9 TOTAL DOWN
AREA
AND PRICE IN SQUARE FEET
0- 20
21 -50
51-151
151 -500
501 -1000
1001 -2000
2001 -5000
10,000
ACROSS
0.62
,11
0.25
0.19
0.10
0.08
0.07
0.06
Item 10 TOTAL DOWN
)
C -3
7'N
11. CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE - PLACED AND COMPACTED,
-- .- . � - -- X11 .. urn. reel
HICKNE55 0- 50 51 -150, 151 -500 501 -1700 1001 -2000 2001 -50(
2"
.16'I 5.23 1.78 1.10 0.114 0.48 0.24
3,
2 5.26 1.70 1.13 OJ 0.52 0,32
4"
5.29 1.84 1.16 0,91 0.55
5"
L2, 5.33 1.87 1.19 0.5 -4
.5' 5.37 1.92 1.24
7
. 50'
.66' USE EQUIPMENT ENTAL AND TIME AND TERIAN FO AREAS
D GRE TER THAN S OWN IN IT M 11
7S'
o'
0.26
Item 11 - TOTAL DOWN
I
12. LABOR COST DIFFERENTIAL
URGENT EMERGENCY AFTER* SUNDAYS/ NORMAL
ITEM OVERTIME TOTAL
CAL U4i AMOUNT MOUES RATE HRATEAYS HOURLY ACROSS
AM OUH� AM,ODNT RATE
Working RATE
4G IO 46,10 46.10 46.10 46.10 35.35
Operator
44.7x, 44,70 44.70 44.70 44.70 33.90
Laborer I 33.70 1 33,70 33.70 33.70 33.70 26.25
Callout cost must reflect the flat one time dollar amount. Item 12 - TOTAL DOWN
cost of calling out a man on urgent or emergency notice.
After hours must reflect the rate for a second shi Ft,
I.e., swing shift.
•
C -4
• JI
LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Genwal Fnginewing Conrranol .. ones LI. NO a...>..
4661 ARROW HIGHWAY • MONTCLAIR. CALIFORNIA 91763 nowQ consTn UQT:on
17141 626 -3946 (714) 984.2266 • PAVING
Gn Aa1NG
C..U.RE
NLAVY EQUIPMENT RENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL RATES AS OF
September 1, 1983
1. D -8 Cat Dozer - No Rippers 118 ... ........................$112.00
D -8 Cat Dozer - W/ Rippers #9 ........................... 120.00
2. 980 Cat Wheel Skiploader (5� Yds.) ...................... 105.00
3. 977 Loader (3 Yds.) .. ............................... 93.00
977 Loader with Rippers) ............................... 95.00
930 Loader ............... ............................... 70.00
4, John Deere 762 Self Loading Scraper ..................... 80.00
621 -B Cat Pull (2 each) .. ............................... 95.00
5. Blade Cat 14G ............ ............................... 79.00
Blade Cat 12G (3 each) ... ............................... 67.00
6. Roller 3 -5 Ton .......... ............................... 49.00
Roller 5 -8 Ton ........... ............................... 49.00
Roller 8 -12 Ton .......... ............................... 49.00
Roller 2 Ton (Essicks).................................. 47.00
• Roller 2 -3 Ton ( Essicks) . ............................... 47.00
Roller 12 Ton 3 -Wheel (Buffalo) ......................... 53.00
Roller 12� Ton ( ?neumatic Rubber Tire) .................. 52.00
7. 580B Case Skiploader # 7 .. ............................... 52.00
680H Case Skiploader # 11 . ............................... 65.00
8. Low Bed Tractor & Trailer (2 hr. Min.) .................. 55.00
9. Water Wagon 113 (1,800 gal. ).: ........................... 44.00
Water Wagon 118 (2,500 gal.)). 51.00
WRCer Wagon #6 !3.600 gal. 53.00
Water Pull 11613 (4,000 gal .) ............................ 58.00
10, Dump Truck 1119 (12 Ton Bobtail ) ......................... 42.00
Dump Truck #2'2,23,24,25,26,27 (14 Ton Dirt)..... 46.00
Du:np Truck & Pup #22,23,24,25,26,27 (Dirt) .............. 49.00
Dump Truck & Pup 1122,23,24,25,26,27 (Rock & Concrete)... 51.50
>" ADD DUMP COST OF $20.00 PER TRUCK F: PUP LOAD ............ 20.00
11. Trash Truck with Trailer (High Side) ................•••• 63.00
12. Power Broom .............. ............................... 47.00
13. Oil Truck # 6 ....................................... " "' 46.00
14. Overhead Water Tank (7,500 gal.)(Plus set up and Down Cg)200,00/Week
15. 4 x 4 Sheepsfoot ............ I ...................•••..... 110.00 /Day
5 x 5 Sheepsfoot ...... I ..................... ........
16. Spreader Hox. .• 130.00/Day
p11, ktbVE' RATES' ARE' SUBDECT' TD' CHANCE" " ..
0
I
CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA ck:c.\,yr)
STAFF REPORT `O
z' J�y�:'^
Z
DATE: September 7, 1983 - — iii
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -02 A
change of zone from A- Limited Agriculture to R -C
(Multi - Family Residential) for 1.93 acres of land located
on the west side of Vineyard Avenue betrween Arrm� Route
and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207 - 211 -24.
Related File: OR 83 -18
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission, at its August 10, 1983 meeting, held
a public hearing and approved Development Review 83 -18 for construction
of 24 apartment units. In addition, the Planning Commission recommended
approal of the Negative Declaration and Zone Change Planning
above- described project. Please find attached a copy o
Comp ission staff report which fully describes the project.
The proposed zone change and project are consistent with the City's
General Plan and related ordinances. The project site is appropriate
size and shape to accommodate the proposed development. No adverse
environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this zone change.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing item in
The Dail Report newspaper and notices were mailed to property owners
within feet of the project site. To date, the only correspondence
opposing the project (see attachment) was presented to the Planning
Commission by Ms. Connie Reece. Ms. Reece indicated that she has been a
resident of this area for the past eight years and did not like the
o
change in her area from the rural atmosphere which once toasted zoned
addition, she indicated that she wished her property
commercial.
)d �
0
0
C]
J
Is
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Zone Change 83 -02 /Lee
September 7, 1983
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the zone change request through adoption of the attached
ordinance and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Vairin
Senior Planner
MV:FD:jr
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report For ZC 83 -02
Planning Commission Staff Report For OR 83 -18
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval For ZC 83 -02
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval For DR 83 -18
Planning Commission Minutes - August 10, 1983
Correspondence
City Council Ordinance
•
•
il
C_ rrmV nV o e Vcun rrr A UnVC A
STAFF REPORT
5'M i
e
DATE: August 10, 1983 = cl
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -02 - LEE - A
channe of zone from A- Limited Agriculture) to R -3
(Multi - Family Residential) for 1.93 acres of land located
an the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Route
and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207- 211 -24.
Related File: OR 83 -18
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a
zone change from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to R -3 (Multi - Family
Residential)
B. rurpose: To construct 24 apartment units
C. Location: West side of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Route
an oot ill Boulevard
D. Parcel Size: 1.93 acres
E. Existing Zoning: A -1 (Limited Agricultural)
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant parcel
G. Project Density: 12.4 du /ac
H. Surrounding Land Use and tonic:
North - Vacant parce _ingle family residence, zoned A -1
South - Vacant parcel, zoned A -1
East - Citrus groves, zoned R -1
West - Vacant parcel, zoned A -1
i, General Plan Oesi gn_ations ;�
roject ite - Me iAio side
North - Medium Residential
South - Medium Residential
East - Medium Residential
West - Medium Residential
itial (4 -14 du /ac)
(4 -14 du /ac)
(4 -14 du /ac)
(4 -14 du /ac)
(4 -14 du /ac)
,7
C
•
II. AN.ALVSIS:
A. General: The request for the change of zone is in conjunction
with a -24 unit apartment project on 1.93 acres of land located
on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Route and
Foothill Boulevard (Exhibit "B "). The development proposal, DR
83 -18, is also on the agenda for the Commission's review and
consideration. A description of the project is provided with
the Development Review staff report.
The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the types of uses that would be permitted within the R -3
zone. The zone change, in conjunction with the development of
12.4 du /ac, will not create adverse impacts to the surrounding
properties and will be compatible with the medium density
General Plan designation of 4 -14 du /ac.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study has been
comp ete y t e app icant. Staff has completed the Environmental
Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts
related to the project.
IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project site is adequate in size and shape
to acco-- mmoate the proposed project. The change of zone is
consistent with the General Plan and has a density within the range
•
allowed. The approval of this zone change will not create adverse
impacts on surrounding properties.
V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in a ai a ort newspaper and all property owners within 300
feet 07 t e su Jett property have been notified. To date, no
correspondence related to the zone change has been received.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
consi e— aTlinput and elements relative to this project. If after
such consideration the Commission can support the findings,
adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate.
Resp /Ctfully submitted,
Rick Gomez
City, Planner
RG:FD:jr
',Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Resolution
•
{ i ,)
C C
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -103
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 83 -02 REQUESTING
A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM A -1 TO R -3 FOR 1.93 ACRES,
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE
AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN 207- 211 -24
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of June, 1983, an application was filed by
Bill Lee and accepted on the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of August, 1983, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following in ings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access,
size, and compatibility with existing land use in
the surrounding area; and
2. That the proposed zone change would not have
. significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding properties; and
3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with
the existing and proposed General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found kat
this project w TTnot create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 10, 1983.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That Pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 10th day of August, 1983,
Zone Change No. 83 -02.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No.
83 -02.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council.
I11
Resolution No, 83 -10? C
Page 2
BY
s
•
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1983.
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ng
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City o` Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of August, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, REMPEL, JUAREZ, MCNIEL, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .
0
130
0
L
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval for
construction of 24 apartment units and a zone change from A -1
(Limited Agriculture) to R -3 (Multi - Family Residential)
B. Purpose: To create 24 apartment units
C. Location: West side of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Route
and oothill Boulevard
D. Parcel Size: 1.93 acres
E. Existing Zoning: A -1 (Limited Agricultural)
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant Parcel
G. Project Density: 12.4 du /ac
H. Surroundin land Use and Zon in
Nort - acant parce an single family residence, zoned A -1
South - Vacant parcel, zoned A -1
East - Citrus groves, zoned R -1
West - Vacant parcel, zoned A -1
H. General Plan Desi n_g_ation s:
roject ite - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
North - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
South - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
East - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
West - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
I j
C—
CITY OF RANCHO CCCANIONGA
cvcMaio
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
August 10, 1983
10 "'
TO:
Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY:
Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
83 -18 -
L The development of apartment units on 1.93
acres
TTnd in the A -1 zone (R -3 pending) located on
the west
side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Route and
Foothill
Boulevard - APN 207- 211 -24.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval for
construction of 24 apartment units and a zone change from A -1
(Limited Agriculture) to R -3 (Multi - Family Residential)
B. Purpose: To create 24 apartment units
C. Location: West side of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Route
and oothill Boulevard
D. Parcel Size: 1.93 acres
E. Existing Zoning: A -1 (Limited Agricultural)
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant Parcel
G. Project Density: 12.4 du /ac
H. Surroundin land Use and Zon in
Nort - acant parce an single family residence, zoned A -1
South - Vacant parcel, zoned A -1
East - Citrus groves, zoned R -1
West - Vacant parcel, zoned A -1
H. General Plan Desi n_g_ation s:
roject ite - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
North - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
South - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
East - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
West - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
I j
Development Reviev(_ -18 /Lee
Planning Comnissio% ,agenda
August 10, 1983
Page 2
•
I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of a vacant parcel
which slopes gently from the northeast to southwest.
Currently, the site contains a variety of indigenous field
grasses and native plant materials. No structures are located
on the site and street improvements do not exist.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed development will consist of 24 apartment
units with attached enclosed garages. In addition, the project
contains a limited recreation area which includes a swimming
pool, tot lot, and cabana. Two parking spaces have been
provided per unit with an additional five spaces provided for
guest parking. In addition, the applicant is requesting a
change in zone from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to R -3
(Multi - Family Residential). The project site is adequate in
size and shape to accommodate the proposed apartment
development which conforms to R -3 standards. The change in
zone and density of 12.4 du /ac are also consistent with the
General Plan land use designations of Medium Density
Residential (4 -14 du /ac).
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was
generally p1ee sea with the design of the project but was •
concerned with providing additional detail to garage doors and
"breaking" garage eave lines in order to provide greater
distinction between individual units. In addition, the
Committee recommended providing low privacy walls designed to
define unit entrances. Lastly, the Committee recommended that
apartment units be setback eight (8) feet from the circulation
aisle in order to prevent vehicles from parking in front of
garage units.
C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee
was primarily concerne w surface drainage and suggested
that the project drain to the southwest corner of the property,
to be accepted by Tract 11144. The Committee also suggested
that the development may be able to drain to the adjacent
County flood. corridor, Lastly, the Committee requires full
street improvements along Vineyard Avenue including curbs,
gutters, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, pavement,
etc.
D. Environmental Assessment; Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by t e app icant. Staff has completed the
Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse
environmental impacts related to the project.
E
i � L
11
Development Revie 3 -18 /Lee
Planning ColnffliSSidt. Agenda
August 10, 1983
Page 3
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution
are supported by the following facts:
o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the development and the proposed residential uses are in
accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance.
o The proposed site plan, in conjunction with the conditions of
approval, is consistent with the current development standards
of the City.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental
review in The Dail Re ort newspaper. To this date, no
correspondence has een received either for or against this
project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
con uc� to pubTic hearing and receive all public input on this
matter. If after such consideration the Commission can support the
facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the
attached Resolution is recommended.
Respectfully `submitted,
I
Rick /Gomez
City Planner
RG:FD:jr
'Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "C" - Illustrative Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevations
Exhibits "E & E -I" - Perspectives
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
C �
s
of
DETAILED SITE PUN: - - -- - .-tea
TINT'
P`
LECI �CRIVTION
SITE ANALYSIS
�, .r E rnv •r �e:^
.�. ..
tn
V
IN'ORTI I
CITY OP ITEM.
RANCIIO CL:CANK)NGA TITLE
PLANNING DIVISK)` EXHIBIT _/6�5G \Ll •
-) 4
7
F-- T
I / I I
I
w
L961 `M1MEpl -- --.-
N Lf
rONCFPTt]Al
C�
NORTH
CITY OF ITI: ',N I;
CUCI�NIO.\ nt TITI,r.t
PLANNING DIVISON EXI IIIIJTI L-12 SCA I.El
c c
C
:uoci:w - -
ILLUSTRATIVE ' SRE FLAW
MlNr ' M.1P
% �o -
LEOK DESCRIPTION;
amass. -au� -
r..�+ w.. -1sr crrs
IEG�L
_-
�. v a !�� nwrr :rn
.•s .. ..s e � w .�r a�a.v a w.+n.+.iar.
uM .rTn .e.Nd
P....ti �lwmwwr lsH
_
V
NORTI 1
crry OF ITI \I:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ��� ICU
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT L SCAL r
f;%
0
•
c
LEFT ELEVATIO=.:- ._,.
FRONT ELEVATION: L_L•- _�_
REAR ELEVATION'
ILU45TWMVE ELEVATIONS .wr
CITY OP ITEM:
RANCHO CUGVNK) \G1 TITLE: Imo - z Ions
PLANNING MTSION EXHIBIT TJ SCALE
131
C V
NORTI i
I
ORANGEWOOD TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS.
NORTH
CITY OF ITIAI:
RANCHO CUCA`UNGIA T,Ti.r: pwk,Lie
PLANNING DIVISION SG \LG:
13A
•
CITY 01' ITFAU -------
CUCAMONGA TITLE;
PLANNING Dl\'LSI()N' FXIIIBIT, sc,ILD-
L)
MS.
ORANGEWOOD TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS-
NORTH
CITY 01' ITFAU -------
CUCAMONGA TITLE;
PLANNING Dl\'LSI()N' FXIIIBIT, sc,ILD-
L)
' C �
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -104
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION •
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -18 LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD IN THE A -1 (R -3 PENDING) ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of June, 1983, a complete application was
filed by Bill Lee for review of the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of August, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project.
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
SECTION 1: That the following can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the
objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes
of the zone in which the use is proposed; and
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not bn detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and •
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of
the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance;
and
4. That the proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on August 10, 1983.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -18 is approved subject to
the follo; ing conditions and attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Additional garage door detail shall be added and
garage roof eaves shall be broken in order to
provide additional variety and visual interest.
2. Low wing walls shall be provided at building
entrances designed to give additional identity to
individual units.
•
IL-i0
Resolution No. 83 -104/ /
Page 2 i
3. All trash enclosures shall be provided with lattice,
trellis covers, or similar shade structure designed
to shade trash areas.
4. Lease agreements shall stipulate that parking
outside of garages shall be prohibited, except in
designated visitor parking spaces.
5. A six foot high solid concrete block wall shall be
constructed adjacent to the existing single family
residence (northeast corner).
6. No Building Permits shall be issued until the City
Council approves the associated Zone Change.
I. Approved drainage structure, designed to accept and
convey runoff from the parcel to the north shall be
provided to the southwest corner of the project
site.
8. Site is to be graded to drain optimum amount of
runoff to southwest corner of property.
9. Drainage gutters shall be revised to remove
flowlines from travel path of drive.
10. A conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to and
approved by the grading committee prior to issuance
of building permits.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
11. The widening of Vineyard shall include the east side
of the street to provide for a left turn lane with
design speeds of 45 mph.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1983.
PLA NG OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUcWAONGA
BY:
ATTES
Resolution No. 83 -104
Page 3
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho •
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of August, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, REMPEL, JUAREZ, MCNIEL, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
•
•
I(IZ
\y
1# •
Cf PP mV Of s"'INITN DEVELOPMENT
g :�pz9p CGnoli lon5
���- --
�(l4AG�lZ'
/lotPllw: _
a( ll+oae ILMa [Grey ed art co "'ILL dins of approval.
�nF.lt� d Nlzil CO' a[, ,,, vto,lln0 DIVIS ION 100. tppllAHCE NI1N iFlE i01LON 116
1
antes+ retained EY me
A. it -tt =rtz
/t Ce•e yep ^e �t P.a,e. epVrnv,l Mall teD ire• not ial` pr ap Dl vvef
f I `,p IJI[9 per^Ita are �onNZ f,,n In, dal¢ o
pia ^,'ail Ca'� „c, an.vJ .a his I.]n[Len IIBj
a'. oval-w [need for a Period of tail
lh ^lllonal the .mill - PP... +l Is 9'•
1. slrtu s. the P onn in, Ccnmisa \ay...... Condition',
-- - �r th y,l tar Jela ni9 towrtlont Or rc
tae ier +n' unless attended EY one
lop aDOrovel shalt e,i"on rop s of a0propv ed d
J, le•utLe tract y( tit oDnin, lraa the aso..r at 1 this
fine t hJI
-- PUrm n3 C.,.mn t.enty -f -tar 1231
p.,y,t a
e, Sllz Oweb'` "t In act9rdanq Mlth the -DD,,,ad +Ile Plans
11, Int a shall De Javeloped is ton and the Conditions costa load hallo'
rs nla ,n to, D1enning "v .11
o site 011.5 and hu,ldfn9 elrv+dons yl encore rvD w.l by
�.. ....led shall Et subs ltted Itr re •n1 t+.
i� tnn;I t,tM .l apprtv., .�
1 to-_ Plarning ".flours Dr\or e1. ssu rice o[ Eul�ld 1191gatton Dl ms,
ding Plane' "'Pldapf lo` ze
1 P11 tl to plant. 9r+ hall ae Cotrd loaned for Cgo +latln<Y Dr a
street tnprovemG ^t plant sar tis I,nal aeD approva .enteel Gr
lltua^ce of Eo,ldm9 Pen'6.or aDprar.6 .1. n-a cV'mGlx'ed•
of • -item In, tunas is ton.
-that 1, -4t. to alt +o
Ilance w
a- pp o^aI of [nit lot. t S --it hot -a I ll caE la `,,, DrdlnanCt +. a
e5 0
of a IDs, ^9 !'rd"ap l ens o +otc,l +c Plans +n Ilect at ln[ tIe< 1
+.plying' Prrn It 1 -t•
e.a uin9
ale of the Dmlect alre or 'usenet ine3lc a+itr 'idyl
1 5, Pr far nc a tne.eon, t11 fond Vt ions of vprov sPls�nrrs.
be for toted to the sit's fart on OI tut Uq vI
�d, A dc[+, led On -S lte U9nt,nY
plan shift ttFTlssmn-Ie rot e1 ae`a -.
aovrovel Er the P1 rnnog olvlAm Dr alum pat ton.
fan in Ve ldl IndlC Ssohot to adrerzelr +I /act +dl acnM1
PermIt'. od .echta of s
ney9nt
p: tDer[,es. hlcE -col ar -,d a, th
f tsoon l rot, In, shelf be It variable a 1 he suhmf tied In lof
}u "Ithit ie r mt r arena .al prior to Vnwp[c nl
1' trla• er se.
ors Dpra
Plarsn m9 Dlv+t ien for shall be ' \
Euf ldl n9 Derm,ls. Jr omdll ltnrr s,
otl aODUrlenances. Inc lad ln9 he z0un0 o- +p er ed
J�B. M1II r tcJ. snle+srd Voe requ+re.l dbr the Plum rnY an
rth,UCtur+11Y lne9rtlez and streets 6
I rom ado ace ^t proper ,a shall 1.e lnc lu.le•1 h hollein,l plans.
0ul1dln9 Dlvlzlont. D'- of m,tlal develop ^rot shall
All s.In,n,n9 pools Installed +t the t,me
9, be supplerented with solar neat ln9' s c,r<uletlon .,]" 'be,
l De
bout the let eI -,ent to c act O.r111 nYS +I In ODe^
leatur,aed pedeatrlm Dath.aYS ono
provide) lhr,,ri
sw-ts mar aealmnet uses. Idea, all trash m -� a1.
JI he for Individual •ra ll rreptac yes in iz lard
_ 11. ❑ antr aIf gel train rece`4C.ezn ° D`
puollc rsr.. bled by + a rpot
112. fresh rilaauc yell) are rYVUi red and mall x r
II 1ev suol e<tt lCO app ovil shy V e PLnm p]
ntgh na .1 hall be n
St enJ+rJS. loc+lion
obis son. the o-tr pianrsu4 ril
trte.ed ant +pprered hY I, a�p u
ll. Street names
'I'll 11 .dopted Svee, xa =In9 Palmy. v ^ar
uco`as.,d w a^
and -treat 11th of the im.l Iract aP dill shall Sr IJenl 111e0 In
1.. All Id In9's nw Aers and Ind lviduer u
tic luJ m9 Drotrr Il inn na U nn.
c lry and mnclse 'nann<r v,a 11 or pride ✓u
or da^cr .I,h We f iJtes ea nr l; ell P11 s' a and Mosier 15. local htht t , treet PlanneJ EVuel vile nllrsg nl z a Ul
mrou9 vim trail Plan on vale in +'r
erJs - .•tn Y
tee n led condl UOyz. fen -In9 and .ern hl,I nr. otlil tai fur eintyo tat
`no,Wt 1 ..ndtrd d a dins. ^ 1 nu 1.o u,
Nardm laOYltne pl,r m9 D,,,,I mprio rto l'of tit re •t npni.a :.n[ and
Int flies Tr act M.P. and D'
grading Plant-
-1 -
16. A ropy of the Covenants, Conditions and Ae,triCtiOAS (CUR'S) and
t +±Ls of . . , . . at inn or [,c [bnau.nen ah"c atlon, subjw,t to
ryp •.al cl 11 Von ma i'J fn9meerin9 O's,11 -1 and the City
At olio'• Shill b, rtw•J.J a0 ton hiss and A copy provided to the
C, I,.
[. � In XanJ P ant
�1. S.IiJ col ntrnor J,.A,,. 5 c city dead bolts and locks Shall be
us[a lied cn ai.n u,11 m In`t pre Jalt.
�j. Se,A,i:, Je,1veI i...n ai AInd.. Islas Shall be '.;ai[ed Dn each soft.
9. All units within this ce.el.pmeat Shall be Dreplowri to be adapted
tar a solar ntrr hrrtmg umt.
�1. Energy cinse.,,,q bo,ISing materials and appliances are regulred to be
.ryri;tl i this proj,t to include such things as but not
l 'rpu en st..Ir hinds, better grade of
Ir:Se tatia +,1 J...c le pvu,J vindov.. .A le.,m] overnan,a, D11.1 ills
A011,1 <cr1, e...
5. Inq develapmeut shall prgvlde an option to hvR buyer, to "Chase a
,star -err heating unit.
_ _6. "Ailing u, cs sn,il be con,tructed with fire retardant material and
-r non via [+, le ,.I oat ar ea 1.
L9 All .sys, open arms. and landscaping shall be permanently
tinto red by a oC fallen p other me acceptable to
`�u ^avrule al am mien wCa or be svdalta ed to IM
VlAnn, ba.... prior :o I,Sm ne of building pernits.
8. It.n prole[ s..All p,c,,JA . minlmm percent of efordable
A'. r
ing 1`„r e•a5. on Fernand. 'AIth General Plan housing
pal a lrl .`1 tn`h in, 1,. ecru derided in the Gdvrh Xanagrrent
Ord =l L.r beilsitr shall be aeterminM by current nIrk.t rate'.
ref Ana °, rn 1,, zr -, levels at the tree of construction of Out
project. Ar lJyeenent to such shall be approved by the City Planner
prior to Iss c of building permits.
�9. pllor, to asst peel and ...Ordatl.A Df t" final .p. W prior to
it building permits. when n S.14ha,fon.1 Il involved.
�ittee Cerltficatiun from all aFfJCted School blstrlct,, Shen be
A.1-11 J 10 a o•p J:Iment ut Cornet, DairelppMnt whim stairs tsat
adqu rte school facilities art or all be .,able of Accommodating
11.4,11 9-.11.11d by this DrpJect. Such letter of tertfflcattan An It
A., plan Iliucit .y the SLAW f1stllel wIthl. ninety 190) day, 111.1
A the final r apgnal an the .,e or the Subdivision map pr
IJ Seance or h the .Se or .I1 other r.IJen 11.1 prv]e<ta.
-- 4�1
Project NO.
ZID.
Prior to approval and recordation .1 the final hip, or prior to
issuanre Of building permits .1¢d n map Is Iomivfd. .ntten
aril(l,.,,.A from t ail ec led v r J15tr is t. !ha[ at..lnJ le J
na
r
end eater facilities viii be A,,,; .,Is t, s e it,, b,.,.,Cd
pooled, shall be s,eb,dttM to ti C. ArV`nl of tom- •'molt,
develaPrtnt. Such letter .tat have been ISSUM by Ina mater loll ¢t
-thin ninety (90) dq3 prior to final nap 811.10 l n Inc case of
Subdiv1Slon Or Issuance of permlti it, All ot ail -the'
•11 Jent 111 I.Jects. for pro]ec [s uNng slot c lank facllitiel
allonble by the Santa Ana Re9m•el uster Control :hint and tht City.
erllten certlfl:atl- or aclelilbil" , In' lot ing ,all It """flat
I n lorwelm, stall ed rbtA,.Id and Sabi LLled to the City.
11.
This Subdivision was not lubnitled a, a total development package and
Is required to reapply for a point rating restive to the design
action of the -forte Mo. grew At Ordinance poor to final aPPI.o-I and
mcordnlaa .1 the map.
D. Parking b Vehicular ACCest
1.
All parking lot landvsped Islands shall hale a minima outside
diransfon or 5' Andy shall Contain m 18' walk Adjacent to parking
stall (including Curb).
2.
Parking lot trees shall be . -hot. 15 get l no siAa. planted at
Intervals or l0 feel less than the nature dsaieler of the [Idea along
the penme ter of each parting OJy.
JJ.
All parking spaces shall be striped per City standard dra -ng5.
1e.
All units shall be provided with aawnauc garage door openers It A
drlvnay lA leis than 20 feet iii dept-.
S.
Sea Covenants. Codes and Restrictions 11,111 restrict I6e Stoiege of
recreatlunal vehicles on this ute unir55 the, a t the principle
r
of tranlDnrtation for hod hill P I.ILIL Pat 1, 11,
i elector Clrnletidn alt le, dther than In JeS tgnJteJ vial tar pi ca no,
areas. /a\
E. UMSUpin9
1l.
A detailed LndSUDe and irrl,ltion plan, including slope planting,
Shell be Sulam, teal for review and appronl co, the PWnamg Oro LOo
c,.a, pri na •5 ai p, 1, tq lii.,l a:
prmr Is line a of ban ,
Approval to me I... Of a cnamn lot evLJ,enlev.
2.
Editing trees SM11 be retained wherever pustible. A ,taster plan of
_
,viltin9 tree, 5 -gwln9 their Prsche location, Ana type Shall be
Soon Itted to and A,... eJ by ilia Planning Jlnsian psi r t, aCprou al
of the r—A. grading plan. SJW plan well Use into a unt [ne
proposed 9,.dm.J..hal ices, are to be real U,rU, trium in) mclLadt, and
where new trees will be planted for replac,ent ,I revved trees.
1), S!reet beet, i m hum of t5 gal Ian site or larger, shall be
+tl it :el per City 15 [inLrJ I ortlance with the 9JSter plan of
Scar et 1111. br ire Cary of 0. ^lerdor -azV eeur and al0 •be Dl 11 ater'Or
r sae el I,-" 1.1• on a on e
^[rye a. gf 5•] Van Der gross at re. conprized bl the follawlna
utes,r shall to p' ^ ^,I ",l twin Lm1 dere loynenq z09 -24' boa el
Itr yea, I:a -IS qsl h^. nd lot- 59allor.
or 2 or the Irete planted within the project, shall
be !Pell^^ -n tale t•tes.
/'w �6. 0.P sl.;pt pains r +j2 n of Ibe (51 feel in vertical height and le of
In
1 : a or gala ttr t na 11 be lanstcapad end 19 °0.ancno Cvcananp ae
w r to SIUVe pl n•'rnl `"I r:r2 of the City o tree
eyn 2`Jr'I IIttin j .rl II ;'c luxe oc et lyvl Ion no or Iugerr zltee shrub per
tJ n I, zJ. lt. of s...h irta, and appr Wrle le ground lover.
1f. A,, pl n.t uy a ^1 r ^gat ;on shall be cpna muautb Ha tol.Inca In
by a re ,;,y a ^1 l "rJll y�3 cucn .,,.p ,Id EY t? head, developer Prior Io--ill elea.lng
s ^spe[n on shall be conducted by the
c,aan =y
-11- an
PWr ;rg 0;r sawn LU art ✓mine twat It 1s In sa[Iif actorY condition.
� B. All IsnJic ip ;J ar to zh.11 br ma Iola In <0 In a health and thriving
t,� FFF eanJ;L;on, Ire• fr Gmt.eeds, lydsn, anJ Jebres. hall
ter Ins [a IIN byl tne5de. elopern in ero nenceaA th SUEmte[eCS puns prior
o «. c,wn[Y.
Y10. The Im I dev9n of the perimeter Darbrys, wal b, landzcapin9 and
s, ne.araa shall be mCl.ded ro the regal red bndscape plans and shall
:e 1.011:! to Jpaav al by V¢ Plano Ivry Dsr is Ian.
111. 5ptr bev s. Jrt; p...in, url de +al I, (both uvdlbcalalld Walton[AZpK+`1911
anJ m.easlllei IawlIt Ill ^g, Is reyul "de ""S "'[l�i- ��'2YJ['
�12. Yater and aser9y cr.nservat Ion [echnlques 0.11 be utlliaad, such as
tpeUal Irngsl Ion t <chmWei (e.9.. drip Iral9ation), drought
tolerant plan[ .....ei, it iva lal rneIIIAle, e[C.
1), All pannetrr landuaprd perk +11A ... retitled tD ad anndi Into the
landscape mal,ienan[e dntrlct.
la. Landncaoing a ^J IrnyJU On 11111vs requ lard r be Installed ti public did
a rgnL -'J r.wJY on Lne per ;miter of Lh11 tract area 1..11 be Lanl l nure,ad
;nLn net ^v) the Jerelo0rr until accepted DY lne City and an cued
sn LO lwe 1....... main [<nanu dlstll[l.
0
Project NO. _
F. signs .nl[
1. the .fans jndlcatee on The ,rJ lei d plent aye not aprr ov rd with
'— as 1. PnY L9ns prupuu'.J fur Uas J^ rt1;G... 115"" 1"' sip azld
to raan,._ance w.to the La:. ON lnenep land nq o.,l,ihn prrur tG
avpl l[et:on and approved by the
I;u tII,WGn Gr aIY nyns. r
2. A unlfprm sl CCn program far this eevI n ....... shill be fv'�ml Ilea to the
—' "onfng Dlvls l on far the' rev le+ and I pn or .o IssuenR of
Bu 1lJ Srq perm)cz.
olrectnI nenument slynlsl than De vra rlJed mr epartre^t.
ronduminloa or town... I projects.
G, Additional Amrov al P! utred
L O,.In^nt Berle+ gull be ¢conpllshed prior to
R 9rented znD lec[ to Ilre
2, A. of Tentative fret! nu.
,P,OI
-- approval ) of
N. other A en[Ies
fc re cio Ia bell vmeJ In accardance with
.-,ill fire po tOst te "'d
�2. Emergency access shall be Drov lJrd, main lenm¢ N
e Tree 1a¢lear, .
m of to feel wide at all t� ^ts dun ng tuna rutllun zn
n a•r Janie
with Footbill Fire Oislrict "guvemnts.
13. er ernes eha in of8u,lded9 We rant,ill Ft t, 9,,bInt
rtur ill' pro4 <t nrn a "nab ie. peril to]
tholleara nae re u rvdl i;r prntectsnn "'t'"
r
anwrIl n of a
T a. the prute nlype d rll i [raatmohl Oe I boaeel Service to determine the and
5. In la project falls ..thin
the Fancbn eucaronaa Bedevrlo"..t Area.
'h: parl1cl1 Ion by The a ..hO Cuca r.,nga Ivrlv.N oV ^.'nt berry en inn r 1
prGJ lct. +Ill rb4a1« rev tr+ "nil "pVr oral of [ne Jere In Vnent VIJ .S tY
the A"IeY.
6, permits from other agencte. will be required n folle.s:
A. Celtnni lot: —T«JPn or -To n.0 r^ a or a
—B. CUUnry oust Ma�eW
granny I'di.. j.
C. $an B!rn Fad mo County flood CUn tr 01 onlr ul.
D. Other:
-3-
;. ter and : e ,I., :nail ne at :,gnee and cowl flux t ea 1. nett
YYY - -- Sol E ^m :5 `orr b:e Cau -,Sly county pater District (EGOL foothill
Iv< Ri l lr :ct -a _ cal Ile,lu o<partvent of the county of
So, d„ a, J.,, ie loner cf, cnnp Lance Iron CL.O .all be rxgu free
w Ito lmL DIVISION
1. Site De.e ln,:nj
�I. fhe ,poi grant snail cu.nply with the latest adopted Uniform lullding
b. t.. /Jr , of Cal lIn l l are PIUM, ng Code, Ma[(anal
[I <c[n: n ••,,.I Sn ell a: er appllCable codes, ordinances and
13u Fl u,A, , yell act n :he came .f issuance dl relative permits.
1/2. Prue to iss..ame al to 11J, nq perm It for . mew Veit (dent 1.1 Net l ling
nrtls) a ^,gar yl.l,tr a n to n "I'll., nif,), the applicant shall
parJ ,
it es4bluhxd rate. Such fees may Incline,
bit , Ir. +J c City Beatification fee, Pare fee, Drainage
F-e, 'ant is De.ei.o,ient Pee, Permit and Plan Checking lees. an..
Scl,.l feel.
]. Pru, m of building permit for a hti commercial
w u.+r LD,,h1 n +unticn to an existing aevelopnent, the
rpl r:rt ,.all p,, I .elal— At fees at the eslabhshed rate. Such
1—, -way , t,t n 1 h< I.n.IvJ to: Sylleis Development fen.
;,st —le lien, _rnit and Plan Cncce Sly fees.
e. ,t•ret aJJressas shall be provided by the Building official.
5' J. f -, r, Sir act-,
1.
....... a Co -ol can a it, in. Un Jav But lding Lee For properly line
Cie a.,nces r -ns ..lu ,In) use, Brea end f,re-realitivemess of ealsl leg
b„ IJ,•.s.
2. Eunung pewit .ng(sl shall be tide In Coogly Nib Current Bu llding and
�— luring rxg,la:uns for the Intended use or the building shall De
.cal r.ea.t.
3. L„st ,q sewage disposal facilities Shall be reeoved, filled inll.r
c qp-5 to canply •it, he N1... plumb Ing Code. and Uniform Building
Coen.
e. undergfoud .,It, utilities are b M located W she, en WSlding
pl ms suteweJ for building Permit appitutItA.
1. Grad leg
1. G,.G.ng of t wblect property 0.11 be In accordance with the
Umfarm B.,nnnp C. ^L•, C.ty Grading Standards and a x Expt.d r ding
.)r
,,a"i VS. Ill f.n,I , 1, n.) DI an abs it be In Suit, t an tl al Cdn f ore ante
.,In the Sol, a..J t✓ .env dal "" I ,, plan.
•ly"i
W
F,.J"t Igo.
12. Aso l lz revolt •ha I be prepared by a quaI.f l eE tngl weer I I r In send by
In e State car Callrnrnla to perlAr. s,,h .n•a.
3. A geological report snail be prepared by a qualified engineer or
9,E, of and sS,,attcj at the (inn of application far gr a.bn, plan
cnecA.
Yen. A rough grading plan Shall be <ciplet1d and approved by the Grading
Cull nll[ee prior to re,.rdatiON of the final snhd,r nine map. I,,,
final grading plant Shall be completed and epproraL Ura, to iSnnnle
of lea, ld ing pern,ll.
_ S. AS a costal -loo Subdivision, the (allowing requirement, sn.li be we t:
a. Surety shall be posted and .n aI,es,,nt executed guaranteeing
completion of all on -site drainage facilities necessary for
de.atering .11 parcels, to the as us Faction of the Building m5
Safety Division prior to recurdatlon of 0C m,p-
b. AOVroprL [e easemn[a. for are dlspotal of drainage „+ter that
are CondJcled onto or ever idjaEIAt par Cx lS. .,e in be delineated
.,J recorded to the satlif+ction of the Building and 5alely
D,vlslon.
C. 0n -01e dr.inge Ingravements, went nary for de.a[ering or
peote Cling the SubdlvidiJ properlles, ale to be iA,t,ile.I prior to
64nan[c of told leg per hat 1✓r cons [ruct.an upon v:r p,:rel tall
be subject to, or ccnlnbulet la .Iry .wage Il.ns ecl er viii
leaving or dbh.n . parcel relative to .wadi a bu.W.n, c.'. •.rt as
requested. a
d. Final grading plans fur earn parcel 1.o to be t„hmat =n to lee
Bu 11 J my end Lrely ibvi s, on for appr,. vas I.,I or b. . a A
ba.IJing 11—It'. (alias Tay Le can a.. ,n..a ""1 a, C, 'I ti itc
basis.]
e. An Nape Da,Pl In a.a or I'll (s) Not ,n ver u<,1 be,gnl .na
of 5:1 or y,Eat,r sl,.pes (shall Ill I 'I'I .,th mt„r p,is" u
c.ryl et .on of yrea my a nn.r ,lo.n,t.,, ..ii —I .f r
control 61.11 b< c n,lelx..l to u.e sit rJSt -.1 ..f it nl I"
n, c l al and City •Plan f.n Viii ,. ,all 11 pre,•
N ;n
grr a, watt [he Shod a,.J n.a ,nle,n .l. n -, I. in. Ala P•r ,nl cal L — a .s
alter Sarminat urn.
EBIGNEEAlhO DIVISION
L. Dedication and Vehicular Acce51
1. OailcaticA, shall be Slade by rural man of all .tent, slreel nght-
or -ways and ail necessary easc¢rnts .4 sl.n... can Slit luaat,ve Ship.
Z. Oe.huunn shall be m,de of Me following rlyC [- of -treys on the
/ol l :. ny tre+ts�
j� a]lltranal feet on `Mi_ x7,
_ _ al let ucal lee, on �""Y- _
rd,ul runt on
1. Gran property Irne radius .111 be required per City Standards and
el -11s.
_ l All r If ._ —.11, Ingr¢s to .,no egress from shall be dedluted
ei I.I1 r.1:
S. sec mc
raal a- a
S + .!fits n d maintenance agreements enivring access
,a alf pleeL a �I "i., n fine -lncm of all c roads, drives or
oar,ii, a stn well Je Prunlel , CCSR'i and carrion nall be, recorded
6. n1.�LU4 n ,i,i— shall be made fire the Ingress, egress and Internal
-- c+L!mn al any tre:vs -A:cn .111 be used for delivery of goads to
v t ........ a ,n owe .,read.. or the proposed business.
), priv to dnin,ir usemems for cross -lot drainage shall be required
am ...11 1, Ir 1—m t -d or nou.ed on the final nip.
9. ill -I r ents tr -.
y rng -thin future rl ght- of are to be
g, CCla''ld o r to ce dtllne,lea on me map p<r Uty Engineers
ren rr zn +fits.
9. Eai' -•.net for sld.wlk for pool.. met than be dedluted to the City
.n er Side.alls manger ,nmnln private pr open).
M. Sbee[ 1 + *ents
nstrst full street improvements Including, but met limited to, curb
,I y,tr,, A.C. pa.esent, sldr.ala. drhe approaches, "Italy Ire's
.may s«.at Iqut. as w...... Streets. Peguvenunt of zo.alk
oil govern +d by Ne prov is1. of Planning Comeisle. Resolution
fie. B-B ).
_0, A minieure of E6 -foot aide Treatment within a 40-fort aide dedicated
I 96,- of -.ay shall be cans trutted for all half- lectlon Street%.
1g. [distract tee follo.ing ,lsiing Improveni frcluding. That net
limited [m:
—5—
Project I1�.
STREET MME
TGJIIER9�MT.
sIvc-
I Lt
ONI f
Ani.
slk'E1
CI:4C
A. C.
0rt3EAI
-FE 01pv
15V'J
--
OLdR
Vi
•Includes land.... it, and Ir.lga[lon on we I,. — - -- --
�a. Prior to any vpM1 being pe,for,rd m th. pn11.c fight- of -.,y• Iris
,hall be paid and an a u ,,1a -,.t pe fl— S ll be Oral -1 f+ Inn
City Engine,, Ofll,m. in eA lr[ian [o . 1 Ill., --1, 1, n ,.n .1.
S. street improvement Plans Including cars +ay C,eer del slid[ )tuns
TTTT— ..raved by the City Engineer and prrrirld ey a F•. Irsln•N urrl
E.I in shall be reduired, for all It—' n1-ii, , or avr is
Is a n e of an e r ,i -.n' permit. f:n,r :I,nr ,nn o -lilr. ',,all
in. the location of all a ,Lena ut Jity Ianlrtres (vein V,e ."t
-
of - ".
�IS. Surely Shall be potted and an agreement a trd to nee
of the City Engrain and the City Attor.ny, g.: , 'P1e113 -if
me public r *vr cen, s, prior m weeded, of ti., *,p or t" rs wv.
of building permits..n irJiry rr co t, firer. `
—A A11 I,,-, IMroverenl. "'all be Installed to [fie sat lsf..lion of the
City Engineer, prior to occupancy.
�B. pevenent iV,ping, marking, tnflic and street name 119 „no Shall ee
fns [.f led per the regalr ... It, dl the City E1111er1.
Llse mg [tty road 11,111., rtpsnitrd,t Ln 11,111 n'nn uu— Iv
traffic it all times nW, mensal' nanu,s d,. r.rq cnserv,er:n p Ian
street Oosa.. .erns[ fury be eel n ,r.n n -IS,t nun be
refunde on cocple[ano of ca, the oomtrul 11onar,e ph% "1:”'
a s °II Le
City Engineer.
la. Walkways shall be grovlded between P,bltc srdm.eus ant on v w
-t pedestrlm fire I'.
Cii litfl[ed drainage flows shall not 'III, sme.elks. unner Sid +.alt
i drains shall be Installed to City Slandllds.
h. brain loud -Omni
L I.
The apcliunl will be responsible for construction of all on.site
]r ai wg! Lvu L[ms regn ved ray the City Engineer.
—2. Intersection I . . . . I .ill he required at the following locations:
2. end ord,a,vf p,a,,ct falls within .leas Indicated as subject to
Ilo:din, mLr t u nitional flood Insurance P,c rmm and Is Subject to
the pro -s,os or that progrmm and city ordinance lb. 24.
1 _ a. a dn,age < osuinel endfw flood protection wall will be reau lred to
protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a
/ .tone dram.
�'. adequate prov limns shall be made for teffptAbly, and disposal of
surface Jninvge entering the property from adjacent areas.
6. artier of rceptaoce Ii-em downstream property .,,a Shall be le,.i,.d
rvoill Iron In`, tract flow, ..to Dr twat! DrODlrl let.
YIa+L ✓d shall be designed as a major water carrying
i..t re]'1r �n�1— +,.bineuon Of Special shelf heights, scar
r;e drive a ,tiles, rolled street connections. Ilona protection
wall,. endr. Vi_,nscmped earth berms and rolled dr:ee.ays at properly
/ line.
S / B. Tile Iplld. mg star. dram shall be installed to the satisfaction of
TTT the C.ty E.,,v I,:
itvac. }- How 1114 �-
_�9. a nrdulagic vnd do magu study for the project shall be submitted to
tae Crty G.g in er tar reau..
� �tili,iel
�1. provide all utility services to each lot lawlealing s »Itary seven.
water. electric power, as and telephone.
1L mil uU bt RS with, ebe pr.je l shall M Installed VWerereuM
fnclW,g uLiltun along aloe utma lass less then 1211.
�j. Utility easements shall M provided m led setlsfaction of led serving
otiFry coirpailes and tae City Cnglneer.
a. peveloper analt be responsible in, !M relacation he ..fell., pbill
ub Llfes..1 ry lu ved.
•�t
Project Ito.
�6. developer shall be I.,,it ibl. for the Installation of street lighting
It c'.rJa,c. often Southern Callfornu Edison Cnmpeny and City
xaodards.
6. approvals have felt been secured fro* all utilities and otlier
let .... led +gestalts Involved. approval of the final nap will be
Subject to any requlrenentf that may be. received flan them.
L General Affee renenn aM aoorwae
1. final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City Standards and
,,.ad ... a. A
2. m parcel map +hall be recorded prior to first One subdivlslon to i
prevent creation of uolge".lded parcels.
_ ]. Prim to retardation, a Notice of Intention to fors and/or Join
luMicl, and tightlq Districts Shall be filed with the City
Council. /he engineering costs Inrglyed.lo District formation shall
M barn. east the eevNoplr.
1
• Mr. Bose replied that it goes along 19th Street to the culvert past Amethyst.
Chairman Stout asked if it would sheet flow to Amethyst and how is will get
across Amethyst. Further, will it eliminate the puddle on 19th.
Mr. Bose answered it will sheet flow across and that puddling will be
eliminated.
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.
Mr. Gary Andreasen, engineer for this project, stated that they have made a
study which was provided to staff indicating that by widening 19th Street it
will accomplish more than installing a bigger pipe.
Chairman Stout stated that it doesn't look like a solution is close.
Mr. Andreason replied that this is a better solution. Further, that CalTrans
did not want a storm drain as they thought widening the street would be
better.
There being no further questions or comments, the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 82 -112A, amending the conditions of approval for Tract 12304.
x x x x x
• G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -02 - LEE - A change of zone
from A- (Limited Agriculture) to - Mu i- ami y Residential) for 1.93
acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow
Route and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207- 211 -24.
NEW BUSINESS
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -18 - LEE - The
development of 2 apartment units on acres o an n the A -1 zone
(R -3 pending) located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow
Route and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207- 211 -24,
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed Items G and H concurrently.
Mr. Vairin stated that there would be additional conditions to those contained
in the staff report placed on this project as distributed to the Commission at
this meeting.
Mr. Vairin read into the record _ letter received from Ms. Connie Reece,
opposing the requested change of zone from R -1 to R -3.
Commissioner Rempel asked, regarding the last condition, if staff is really
going to have a left turn with an assigned speed of 45 mph.
Mr. Vairin explained that the lane itself will be designed to accept vehicles
49 entering at that speed.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 10, 1983
�dQ
Chairman Stout asked if these conditions would be placed under the Planning
Division in the Resolution.
Mr. Vairin replied that with the exception of Condition No. 6, they would all •
be Planning Division conditions.
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.
Mr. William Lee, 830 W. 6th Street, Ontario, stated he has worked closely with
staff since the conception of this project and concurs with the conditions of
approval. Further, that his concern is much the same as that of the City and
Planning Commission in wanting the project to be the best it can be. Mr, Lee
stated that they will build the project and retain ownership in it.
Ms. Connie Reece, Alta Loma resident and writer of the letter opposing the
zone change, addressed the Commission. She indicated she has been a resident
of this area for the past eight years and did not like the change in her area
from the rural atmosphere that once existed here.
Commissioner Rempel replied that he too would like things to be the way they
were but it is impossible. He asked Ms. Reece why she did not come forward at
the time of the General Plan hearings. He explained the way the General Plan
was formed which allows higher density at major thoroughfares and the
philosophy of providing affordable housing by increasing density which could
not otherwise be provided.
Commissioner Rempel stated that the General Plan was adopted after much public
input and that the City Council and Planning Commission decision was based on •
this public input.
Ms. Reece stated that she wished to get a different designation for her
property so that she can sell it for a higher price.
Commissioner Rempel adviseu her to bring her request to staff so that it could
be placed before the Commission.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -103, issuing a Negative Declaration and requesting approval
of zone change 83 -02 by the City Council.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -104 approving Development Review 83 -18 with the
modifications as presented by staff and issuing a Negative Declaration.
Mr. Vairin stated to Ms. Reece that she will receive another notification when
this zone change comes before the City Council.
• R ! k
Planning Commission Minutes -7- August 10, 1983 .
�<n
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
commu"ITY i-EWOPMENT DEPT.
A 0 19�3
U�g
4z
�cw
16"
La� mw-
•
ORDINANCE NO.
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207- 211 -24 LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM A -1 TO R -3.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held In the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
• C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
,Is
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rez -ned
in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly.
Assessor's Parcel Number 207 - 211 -24 approximately 1.93
acres in size and located on the west side of Vineyard
Avenue, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard, is
hereby changed from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to R -3
(Multi - Family Residential).
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The
Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City'
Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
(K -'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONTCA
STAFF REPORT�\\I�
ux
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 1.0. 83 -11 - DATA DESIGN - The p acement of two
2 1440 sq. ft. office trailers on 1.8 acres of land
in conjunction with an existing manufacturing facility
in the M -R (Restricted- Manufacturing) zone located at
7915 Center Avenue - APN 1077 - 401 -08.
ABSTRACT: The applicant has requested that the conditions as approved
by the Planning Commission for CUP 83 -11 be amended. The conditions con-
cern the time limit for removal of the temporary trailers, development
of a permanent facility , a a requirement to extend the improvement
agreement for Center Street. A letter from Data Design Laboratories
outlining their concerns is attached.
SUMMARY: In 1981 Tentative Tract No. 11428 was approved with con-
ditions requiring the installation of street improvements along Center
Avenue. The tentative map was given final approval and recorded. To
catisfy the conditions of the tentative map, bonds and a 12 -month im-
provement agreement were accepted for Center Avenue. Construction
of Haven Avenue improvements were postponed to the time of development
of lots facing Haven. As a result of this new application for tempo-
rary office trailers, it was discovered that the Center Avenue improve-
ments were not completed as per the prior approval. Therefore, the Com-
mission was reluctant to approve any more applications for the property
until said improvements were completed. However, in consideration of
Data Design's immediate need to have the trailers on site, the Planning
Commission approved the use permit subject to obtaining a six -month
extension on the previous improvement agreement (this allowed immediate
placement of the trailers) but approved the trailers for an initial
6 -month period in order to insure that the Center Avenue improvements
would be completed in that time. The Commission then would consider
granting a longer period of time such as 2 years. The Commission felt
that it could not issue a blanket approval because it wanted Data
Design to meet its prior commitment and did not want the City to incur
the expense and trouble of calling in the bonds. The Commission's
other alternatives would have been denial or postponement until the
improvements were installed.
APPLICANT'S APPEAL: The attached letter from Data Design requests the
o owing three conditions be amended:
164
September 7, 1983
Appeal of Conditions of Approval
CUP 83 -11 - Data Design
Page Two
"Condition 1 be amended to allow the temporary trailers
to be occupied for a period of two (2) years from the
date of occupancy, unless extended ay the Planning Commission."
The Planning Commission intends to consider a longer approval as des-
cribed above if the street improvements are completed as per prior com-
mitment. The six months was provided in conjunction with Condition No.
3 so that the bonds would not be called. If Council modifies the ap-
proval period, (since Data Design has already executed the extension
of improvement agreement for 6 months) the bonds would be called after
6 months unless a new improvement agreement extension is approved by the
City Council.
"Condition 2 be deleted in its entirety."
•
This condition is academic since the issue is the street improvements.
This condition which is placed on all approc.a.s of temporary facilities
was not changed because the Commission anticipated street improvements
to be completed and a longer approval period could be granted. •
3. "Condition 3 be deleted in its entirety and the improvement
agreement for Tract 11428 be amended to require the improve-
ments to be made only when a building permit for an additional
building in the tract is issued."
Since Data Design has already executed a 6 -month extension, this issue
is moot. However, if Data Design wishes to modify the conditions of
approval of the tract map regarding the requirement for street improve-
ments, (as implied in their letter) it cannot be done through this
appeal process. State law requires a full public hearing to be conducted
similar to the one conducted for the original tract hearing, if a pre-
viously approved condition is to be amended.
ALTERNATIVES: Aside from technicalities, the practical issue Council
must decide is should street improvements be installed as per prior
approved conditions before any other entitlements be approved. If so,
the decision of the Planning Commission should be upheld. If Data De-
sign installs the improvements, the "typical 2 years" approval would
then be considered by the Commission as an extension to the CUP.
•
1 5 !
FJ
September 7, 1983
Appeal of Conditions of Approval
CUP 83 -11 - Data Design
Page Three
If, however, the Council wishes to postpone the improvements longer,
it can require a new improvement agreement and bond for a specific period
of time and grant a longer approval regardless of any new approvals.
The issue of the postponement of improvements to time of another building
approval requires an amendment to a prior approval ano cannot be addressed
through the appeal process but through a new public hearing through the
Planning Commission.
Attached is the Planning Commission staff report, the Planning Commission
Resolution of Approval, and the Planning Commission minutes for the July
27, 1983 public hearing. In addition, a letter from a homeowner west of
Data Design Laboratories in opposition to the appeal is attached for your
review.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the conditions
be uph —'eid.
R pec tf�i ksub'tted,
L
Community Development Director
JL:jk
Atta0ments: Planning Commission Staff Report - July 27, 1983
Planning Commission Resolution No. 83 -101
Piann„ig Commission Minutes - July 27, 1983
Exhibit "A" Data Deisgn Appeal Letter
Exhibit "B" 7/26 Letter from Adjacent Homeowner
Exhibit "C" 8/26 Letter from Adjacent Homeowner
0
•
1 1
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Data Design Laboratories,
is requesting approval to use twn double -wide office trailers totaling
2880 square feet in size. The Zoning Ordinance permits the temporary
use of such trailers with approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission.
The site is located on the east side of Center Avenue, one -half mile
north of Foothill Boulevard. The property is part of an industrial
complex with four buildings totaling approximately 65,000 square feet on
24 acres of land. Exhibit "C" shows a previously approved tract map
which illustrates the future street pattern through the property and
location of each building. The trailers are to be installed on the
south side of Lot 9.
The applicant stated that the modular units will be used for twelve to
eighteen months. A new assembly operation is proposed at the site and
office space is needed for fourteen additional employees. Assuming that
the new operation is succesful, a new office building will be
constructed on an adjacent parcel.
ANALYSIS: Two potential areas of concern relative to this application
are; the visual impact of the trailers on adjacent property; and (2)
parking availability. As shown on Exhibit "A ", the site is located
adjacent to a residential area. However, visibility of the trailers
will be reduced by a 150 -foot setback from Center Avenue and landscaping
along the street frontage, therefore no significant visual impacts are
anticipated. Regarding parking, of the 82 spaces existing on the
subject parcel, the modular units will eliminate approximately 13.
However, the remaining 69 spaces satisfies the Zoning Ordinance
requirements and exceeds the anticipated number of employees at the
site. if any overflow parking is required, the adjacent buildings owned
by Data Design have approximately 50 or 60 unused parking Stalls-
/s I
STAFF REPORTt
r r.
DATE:
July 27, 1983
lu-7
TO:
Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY:
Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -11 - DATA DESIGN - The temporary
p aetient o —two—M 14 40 square foot a 7 ice
trailers on
1.8 acres of land in conjunction with
an existing
manufacturing facility in th- M -R -T
(Restricted
Manufacturing) zone, located at 7915 Center
Avenue - APN
1077 - 401 -08
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Data Design Laboratories,
is requesting approval to use twn double -wide office trailers totaling
2880 square feet in size. The Zoning Ordinance permits the temporary
use of such trailers with approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission.
The site is located on the east side of Center Avenue, one -half mile
north of Foothill Boulevard. The property is part of an industrial
complex with four buildings totaling approximately 65,000 square feet on
24 acres of land. Exhibit "C" shows a previously approved tract map
which illustrates the future street pattern through the property and
location of each building. The trailers are to be installed on the
south side of Lot 9.
The applicant stated that the modular units will be used for twelve to
eighteen months. A new assembly operation is proposed at the site and
office space is needed for fourteen additional employees. Assuming that
the new operation is succesful, a new office building will be
constructed on an adjacent parcel.
ANALYSIS: Two potential areas of concern relative to this application
are; the visual impact of the trailers on adjacent property; and (2)
parking availability. As shown on Exhibit "A ", the site is located
adjacent to a residential area. However, visibility of the trailers
will be reduced by a 150 -foot setback from Center Avenue and landscaping
along the street frontage, therefore no significant visual impacts are
anticipated. Regarding parking, of the 82 spaces existing on the
subject parcel, the modular units will eliminate approximately 13.
However, the remaining 69 spaces satisfies the Zoning Ordinance
requirements and exceeds the anticipated number of employees at the
site. if any overflow parking is required, the adjacent buildings owned
by Data Design have approximately 50 or 60 unused parking Stalls-
/s I
Conditional Use Pet 83 -11 /Data Design 1
Planning Commission 4enda 1
July 27, 1983
Page 2
Regarding the time limit for approval, the Planning Commission has, in
the past, approved the use of trailers for two years. By the end of
this two year period, a permanent facility is to be completed and /or the
trailers removed.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
a tnp—il ut and elements of this project. If after such consideration the
Commission can support the facts for findings, adoption of the attached
Resolution permitting the trailers for a two year time period would be
appropriate.
Resp(ctfu) ly yrtapii tied,
Planner
:CJ:jr
1-71
ts: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan •
Exhibit "f," - Data Design Master Plan
Exhibit "D" - Floor Pldn
Exhibit "E" - Letter from Applicant
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
IS
•
•
0
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: 12 0 P e_ 5 -11 �^rn v ial
RANCHO CL'CANIONGA TITLE L-c^n—tI n A-f
PLANNING DIVISION E\IIIIiIT _Ao SCALE —
LOCKWOOD ENGINEERING -Z915 CEjarz Au-wlc /c AFL) "T-
& SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. RAN CO _AA Ce`F_9n O Rr
380 WEST FOOINd1 BIM
Rialm CElnomu OESCNVIIONC
C I TI(1iA ILF PL:r(/ T mCA
Ek' ST. OFFICE' 1'•z5o B10oo 9.F. 32.pp fjARS _.
EXIST. INCVa7TilAl 1'•500 8.0003.f. IG.00 CARS
FMof� OFFICES 1+250 28805•F• 11.52 CAWS
TOTALS 18,880S.F• 60 CARS mdo
SCALD: I'aG0' PA2WNG Pmoq(D=:
\VEST, NORTH, EAST f Sa H(EXIST.) 49 CARS
CITY OF ]Tr-m: %gipe�- Il- nrcQ+.�v�
RAIN HO CLCIIIC)N( %1 TITLE: !StM v►_ b •
PLANNI \G DIVISM LXIIIRIT _le SG \LE 1p-(-Q'
LOT �A
ROAD
5E JnENM5
N 85 *53'HO
"E 415,4G'
�
1
R•IS.��.
de
B+ISm'
p.ga•SL !'
�•
D 23 55'IS
SD'
E %l5T*G 14 GRj
�E %1ST N� AE ORIJESs PARK414
�
V
ly
27'
I
N
E
1
I
LL
0
0
EXISTING 6UILDI10G"
N
p
0
h
N
LOT 9, 'TRACT No. 11428
V
WI
<
/A.6.155 $!D -2I
F
z
IGIOO 50.FT.
P
�
�
IJ
Od
LL
PROPOSED WCATION
2FxH 1A'K60' /A0i14,OFFiGES
40' GO iG J
I ilk i �a',.
�`-�`
ND�•53 "3o"E 98e.D¢'
I
E %1ST. RGIAINING HALLS
E>JSTING 6UILDING_
+MCYi4E SHOP
I
Ek' ST. OFFICE' 1'•z5o B10oo 9.F. 32.pp fjARS _.
EXIST. INCVa7TilAl 1'•500 8.0003.f. IG.00 CARS
FMof� OFFICES 1+250 28805•F• 11.52 CAWS
TOTALS 18,880S.F• 60 CARS mdo
SCALD: I'aG0' PA2WNG Pmoq(D=:
\VEST, NORTH, EAST f Sa H(EXIST.) 49 CARS
CITY OF ]Tr-m: %gipe�- Il- nrcQ+.�v�
RAIN HO CLCIIIC)N( %1 TITLE: !StM v►_ b •
PLANNI \G DIVISM LXIIIRIT _le SG \LE 1p-(-Q'
.e.
o.<
tiAell v✓ k I/.
��' - iiL -mot �1.�,•� ��''..� �:�� "� U \ w
i
.�� +i 'I for t � U ��i t!' `. ..� �:�•• "a
V. � III r..: ...- '���J- � � � Iti I ���. 1'. '1 i� � •\ � - 3
9 �I W>r ��emv. ew q, tA..l,l'�'� ^. •M `��r i,
yy
iC.'.''
h
V
1012TH
CITY nr
it'-vN ,I-i0 Cuc- \ION,(u\ TITLE: MA-MeC'ft wnl
PLANNING DIVISION EMIIRIT _ "L "_SGALE''—
In I
r
CONF.
ROOM
GENERAL OFFICE
PERSON) 16 PERSONS)
11 PERSON) 112'
CITY OF
RANCHO CL' MONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
11 PERSON) 112-
10'
i
60'
�12
ENGINEERING
IS PERSONS)
0
Rao
Y LAB
11 PERSONI
V V
NORTH
•
ITEM: 4-UP
TITLE FAR eLI4l •
EXHIBIT „dl SC,%E
• VD AT A -DES I G N L a b or at or i e s
7925 CENTER A V E N d t
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
6 July 1983
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Department of Community Development
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Gentlemen: _
Data- Design herewith makes application for a Conditional
Use Permit (non- construction) granting permission to locate
two (2) 24' x 60' modular office structures (office trailers)
in the rear parking lot of its Building No. 3, located at
7915 Center Avenue.
These structures will house approximately 14 persons per-
forming office and administrative functions and one (1)
. research and development technician. The normal hours of
operation will be from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Enclosed are: (1) Uniform Application; (2) Site Plan;
(3) Floor Plan; (4) Property Ownership List Labels, 3 sets;
(5) Radius Map; (6) Notification Labels; and (7) Check for
$398.00.
If the Department has any questions regarding this appli-
cation, please contact the undersigned.
EBA:mkp
Enclosures (1) - (7)
r 1
very truly yours,
DATA - DESGIN LABORATORIES
E. B. Alsip
Executive Assistant
n
oh./I I IA I aa� 4
I��
1 _7
• REEOLUTION NO. 83 -101
A RESOLUTION OF THE R =NCHO CUUMUNGA PLANNIi 3 COMM IGSION
APPROVING /90OW IL CO':)ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -11 FOR
TWO TEMPORARY TRAIL =RS AT DATA- DESIGN LABORATORIES
LOCATED AT 7915 CENTER AVENUE IN THE M -R -T ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 8th :ay of July, 1983, a complete application was
filed by Data - Design Laboratories for review of the above- described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of July, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a public hearing to consider the aM -e- described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can /wwwt be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is proposed; and
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
• applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -11 is approved
subject to the T Mowing conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. The temporary trailers are approved for a six (6)
month period from the date of occupancy, unless
extended by the Planning Commission. However, if
the trailers are not occupied within six (6) months
this approval shall become null and void, unless
extended by the Planning Commission.
2. Development of the permanent building shall be
completed and ready for occupancy, or the trailers
shall be removed prior to expiration of the
Conditional Use Permit.
09
Resolution No. 83 -1�
Page 2
ENGINEERING DIVISION
3. Prior to occupancy an application for an improvement
agreement extension of six (6) months shall be
submitted,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
NG kOMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
s L.
A
ss
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: •
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
0 # # # ##
M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -10 - PRESSLEY - A change of ownership for an
arcane (formerly JJ's Arcane ) in the C-1 zone to be located at 6642 and
6546 Carnelian.
Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.
Steve Pressley, applicant, addressed the Commission stating that his agreement
with the Resolution and conditions of approval.
Commissioner Mc Niel advised that this item had been advertised in the
newspaper and the area property owners notified, however no opposition was
expressed to City staff. He reminded the applicant of the opposition voiced
when Mr. Mannella first applied for the Conditional Use Permit for JJ's Arcade
and advised that he s.ould run his operation in a similar manner.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Mc Niel, unanimously carried, to adopt
Resolution 83 -100 approving Conditional Use Permit 83 -10.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried-
N. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -11 - DATA DESIGN f- The temporary placement of
two ( sq. t. o ice trat ers on acres of land in conjunction
with an existing manufacturing facility in the M -R -T (Restricted
Manufacturing) zone located at 7915 Center Avenue - APN 1077 - 401 -08.
Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that staff suggested an additional
condition be added to the Resolution under Engineering Conditions to require
the application for an Improvement Agreement extension prior to occupancy of
the trailers. He explained that street improvements had been previousiy
bonded for which required their installation within 12- months; however, time
on this agreement had lapsed and development activity in the area has
increased, therefore staff recommends that the extension be applied for and
the applicant begin to make arrangements to install the street improvement;.
Chairman Stout asked what a reasonable amount of time would be to install the
improvements.
's Planning Commission Minutes -10- July 27, 1983
;L^(11
1 �
Mr. Rougeau replied that 6 months is adequate, however they could possibly be
done in three to four months.
•
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.
Dominic Salvati, representing Data Design, addressed the Commission stating
after approval of the parse'.Map City staff had advised the applicant that
there was no urgency to install the street improvements until construction of
additional buildings. He further stated that the trailers would allow Data
Design to bring additional employees and revenue to the City, and urged the
approval of the Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Barker asked if the bond required installation of improvements
prior to additional construction.
Mr. Rougeau replied that there are lien agreements which require installation
prior to construction, however it was his opinion that this applicant had a
12 -month bond.
Commissioner Rempel stated that the improvements on Haven were the only ones
he recalled being deferred by the Commission in its previous review. Further,
normally these improvements would have been required prior to recordation of
the final map.
Mr. Salvati advised the Commission of the importance of the approval of the
Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation of the trailers so that
employees could begin work on August 2. He further advised that he would be
in the City offices the next day to sign the lien agreement extension.
Chairman Stout asked Mr. Salvati to explain his position on the improvements
and if he felt that the improvements on Center Avenue were necessary after the
installation of the trailers.
Mr. Salvati replied he did not feel them necessary at this time.
Chairman Stout advised that the staff is recommending a 6 -month extension to
install the improvements and not 6 months to come back to the Commission for
discussion.
Mr. Salvati replied that the improvements would be put in upon construction of
additional buildings. Further, he was not in a position to make a decision
regarding the improvements, but did not see why the CUP could not be granted
and then have the Commission call in the bonds if the improvements were not
installed in 6 months.
Mr. Rouaeau stated that the agreement would be for a 6 -month extension at
which time the applicant could apply for an additional extension. However, at
that time, the extension could be denied and the City could call in the bonds.
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission Minutes -11- July 21, 1983 •
0
•
9
1
Chairman Stout stated that he was not in favor of approving the Resolution for
the CUP unless it contained a requirement that the street improvements be
installed prior to occupancy of the trailers. Further, that the improvements
should have been done a long time ago and did not see why the City should be
subjected to the expense of calling in bonds.
Commissioner Rempel stated that staff's proposal is a fair compromise for both
the applicant and the City that the street improvements go in; however, did
not feel an additional extension should be granted.
Commissioner Mc Niel stated that approval of the Conditional Use Permit could
be for 6 months and if the improvements are not installed in that time, the
CUP could be revoked.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Mc Niel, carried, to adopt Resolution
83 -101 approving Conditional Use Permit 83 -11 with an amendment to Planning
Division condition one to read that the temporary trailers are approved for 6
months, and the inclusion of an Engineering condition to read: "Prior to
occupancy, application for an Improvement Agreement extension shall be
submitted ".
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ
STOUT
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried -
Chairman Stout voted no for previously stated reasons.
Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that the decision of the
Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council.
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
0. DEVELOPMENT CODE
Rick Gomez, City Planner, presented the report and meeting schedule to the
Commission.
It was the consensus of the Commission that the following meeting dates be
established for the review of the Draft Development Code: August 16,
September 6, September 20, October 4, and October 12. All meetings will be
Planning Commission Minutes -12-
July 27, 1983
K
7
IV' DATA - DESIGN L,a I' a r a t o r i e o 005;,11
155 E4 TEA Aviv I •
CJrAMQNGA. GAL',F09mA 91730
Q August 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ADMINISTRATION
AUG 081*3
City of Rancho Cucamonga AM QM
93320 Baseline Road 71819110111XI1(2130A6
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn; City Council
Subject: Planning Commission Resolution 83 -101; Appeal from
Gentlemen:
On 8 July 1983, Data - Design Laboratories filed an application
for a Conditional Use Permit for the temporary use of two (2)
1,440 square foot office trailers in the rear of its Building 3
at 7915 Center Avenue. The trailers will house the office and
administrative personnel of one of Data - Design's subsidiary •
companies, Siltron Illumination, Inc. This company is being
relocated to Rancho Cucamonga from Gardena and will create approx-
imately 25 new jobs. At its 27 July 1983 meeting, the Planning
Commission approved the Conditional Use Perr,iit subject to several
conditions.
The Commission granted the permit for a period of six (6) months,
unless extended by the Commission. Data - Design was informally
advised and it was publicly stated at the Commission meeting that
such permits are usually granted for a period of two (2) years.
The Commission fur�h�r requires that a permanent building be
completed and occupied or the trailers must be removed prior to
the expiration of the permit. No such building program was
mentioned in Data- Design's application nor was this condition
discussed at the commission hearing, As Data- Design is only in
the early feasibility planning phase for new construction, a new
building cannot be in place within six months.
As a final requirement, the Commission insisted on Data- De�igu
filing a rec;❑ect for a six (6) month extension of an improvemont
agreement orior to occupancy of tae trailers. Since occupancy
was scheduled for 3 August 1983, this extension application was
CITY OF rr .:,1:�(�P. 83 11 - f ttA'TZrJG\1 •
RANCHO CCG\NICA( "A rITrs
PLANNING DIVISION r•.NI nl;rn W SCAU:
I 11
•
19
1
DATA - DESIGN LABORATORIES
_�\ugunt 1983
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page Two
filed on 28 July 1983. This improvement agreement, entered into
by Data - Design in June 1981 as a part of the process of sub-
dividing Tract No. 11428, requires Data - Design to make improve-
ments to the east side of Center Avenue and to construct certain
private streets inside the tract. While the formal agreement
calls for completion of these improvements by a certain date, now
past, the understanding by Data - Design was that these improve-
ments would not be required until an additional building was
constructed in the tract. Such a development might cause an
increase in the traffic flow on Center Avenue and then, and only
then, would the Center Avenue improvements be warranted. When
Data - Design's Building 3 was constructed, prior to the subdi-
vision, that portion of the internal private streets serving that
building was put in place.
One of the concerns of the Commission was that the relocation of
Siltron would cause an increase in Center Avenue traffic over
that which existed in June 1981. As a matter of fact, the total
employment at Data - Design's Rancho Cucamonga facilities at 30
June 1981 was 287 persons. Because of the delays involved in
obtaining approval of a tract map during 1980 and 1981 which
held up application for a new building permit, Data - Design had
to remove one third of its rapidly growing Rancho Cucamonga
business to Anaheim, California. With the move to Anaheim of
some 120 jobs, the plans for the new building in Rancho Cucamonga
were scrapped. As a result of the business relocation to Anaheim,
the 31 July 1983 employment level stood at 173. Even with the
addition of a maximum of 39 new Siltron employees, including
transfers from Gardena, the total employment will be 212. This
is 75 fewer employees than in June 1981, a decrease of 268.
Major street improvements are not called for at this time. It
should be noted that the Commission's concern was based on one
(1) letter to a City Councilman questioning a possible traffic
problem.
In light of the foregoing, Data - Design Laboratories appeals to
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for relief from
Ranrhn Planning Commission Resolution A3-101 as follows:
Condition 1 be amended to allow the temporary trailers to be
occupied for a period of two (2) years from the date of
occupancy, unless extended by the Planning Commission.
Condition, 2 be deleted in its entirety.
'cf lirr{r "A" 1-3 n
8 Aug, -%t 1983
City i Rancho Cucamonga
Page Three
DATA-DESIGN LABORATORIES
Condition 3 be deleted in its entirety and the Improvement
Agreement for Trac= 11428 be amended to require the improve-
ments to be made only when a building permit for an addi-
tional building in the tract is issued.
DS:mkp
Very truly yours,
DATA-DESIGN LABORATORIES
Dominic Salvati
Ex,:utive Vice President
:fir' i M}i EM "�k"
0
•
•
0
July 26, 1983
l
Richard Dahl
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission.
9340 Baseline Road, Unit B
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: APN 1077- 401 -08
Dear Mr. Dahl:
We are opposed to the placement of two temporary office trailers at the Data Design
facility located at 7925 Center ?.venue in Rancho Cucamonga.
At present Center Avenue is unable to handle the vehicles entering and exiting from the
Data Design plant during rush hour periods.
Curbs and gutters are not constructed on the Data Design side of Center Avenue
making the street extremely narrow at this point. This, in addition to the chain link
fence surrounding the Data Design facility, make it impossible for vehicles leaving the
• plant to see on- coming traffic. As a result, we have had many close calls coming into
and leaving our neighborhood.
We feel that Data Design should be required to widen Center Avenue by constructing
curbs and gutters on its portion and that it conform to current industrial zoning
requirements by removing the chain link fence and landscaping the side walk area.
This we feel would lessen the current and dangerous traffic situation and would aid in
reducing the impact of this industrial facility adjoining a residential area.
Sincerely,
Jim and Sandy Stiller
10265 Ashford Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
714/980 -1753
CITY OP
RA\CHO CL;CAJIONG:1
MANNING DIVISION
((O�NONTA .
OEVUO MENTO PTT
JUL 27 196 3
hM PM
71g 1g llp Ill 11211(213141516
ITEM c--.v.P.23- 11•i�',f(ArUey&A3
rrri.l•; ?�zc Errr'e�Pww �. Ho�«.►,>EK.
L \I IIISIT� _ SC,\L1: "
,1
60!1 I'D Ill y h l 11212 Id 10 6
August 26, 1933
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION
9340 Baseline Road
Unit B
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Gentlemen:
We are opposed to Data Designs appeal of your previous decision.
We feel that the commission is already taking a significant risk in allowing Data Design
to occupy the temporary office structures without first requiring them to resolve the
extremely dangerous access condition that presently exists.
In addition, the blue and white, flat roofed metal offices that have been moved onto the
property are extremely unsightly. We feel that if the commission had any knowledge of
this eyesore they would have turned down the original request in its entirety.
The Data Design plant already enjoys the luxury of operating a manufacturing facility in a
residential area without meeting wny of the current zoning requirements. The addition
of the office trailers only adds to their negative impact upon our neighborhood.
Sincerely,
JIM & SAN Y MILLER
10265 Ashfo d Street
Rancho-Cucamonga, CA 91730
U
L
CITY OF ITL.\I: GD.P SS- fI- �KtA"Cff-I
R.1 \'CIAO CL'Gi.UO \(Jr � TITLB: 8(26 fPt7W_;y�t1 �n3 tbrfEn�.k�
PLANNING DIVISKYN I7\I1MIT. Ile" SCALE
1'`'3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
� ��iui.elotb
Px
— 1917 I
SUBJECT: Appeal of Conditions for Parcel Map 8007 located on the west side
of Hermosa Avenue between Wilson and Hillside Avenues requested by
Janine Biane Tibbets developer
On July 27, 1983, Planning Commission approved Parcel Map 8007 subject to the
conditions of the attached City Engineer's Report and Resolution No. 83 -98.
Janine Biane Tibbets, agent and attorney -in -fact for the owners, Philo and
Jeanne Biane, has submitted the attached letter appealing the following three
conditions:
I 1, General Requirements and Approvals
Item 711 , whiffs "Nble dwellings on Parcel 1 must be removed or
. improvements for the parcel bonded prior to recording."
Ordinance No. 28 -13, Section 1.702.11 and 1.702.12 reads:
1.102.11 Any requirement for the construction of improvements, and any
postponement of such requirement, may be made on a lot by lot basis for
each lot in the subdivision. Such requirement may be noticed by an
Improvement certificate on the Parcel Map (or waiver) or by an agreement
as provided in Section 1.703.
1.702.12 The City Council hereby finds that it is necessary for reasons
of health and safety that all off -site improvements be constructed
within a period of twelve (12) months following the recordation of a
parcel map for each lot on which there exists a building or other usable
structure at the time of such recordation. The foregoing provisions not
withstanding, the City Council, may postpone the construction of off -site
improvements to such later time as it shall, at its discretion, determine.
No postponement of construction shall be granted by the City Council
unless the owner of the subject parcel shall agree in writing to construct
required off -site improvements at such future time as shall then or
thereafter be determind by the City Council. Said contract shall create a
lien upon the property to be divided as security for the performance of
said agreement. Any such written contract and lien agreement shall be
recorded with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County immediately
subsequent to the recordation of the subject parcel map.
I iq
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Parcel Map 8007
September 7, 1983
Page 2
Thus a lien agreement could be accepted for the improvements to Parcel No. 1. •
2. Item d3 which reads "Provide all utility services to each lot including
sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street
construction."
This is a standard condition to insure that newly constructed improvements
are not torn up to provide for utilities and covers all the parcels.
3. Street Im rovements
Item which reads "Construct the following missing improvements prior to
recordation for Parcel #3 ... curb and gutter, sidewalk, pavement, trees,
street lights, etc."
Planning Commission recommended that City Council accept a lien agreement
for the construction of street improvements on Parcel No. 3 with the
understanding that the improvements would be constructed at the time of
development of the adjacent Tentative Tract No. 10047 or at the time of
development of Parcels No. 2 and 4. Minutes of the Planning Commission
are attached.
RECOMMENDATION
If after consideration of all the input presented, City Council decides to
waive the appealed Conditions, Staff will prepare the necessary lien agreement
for the owner's signature.
Respectfully submitted,
n
Attachments
-1S
•
•
•
IJ
ILIV IAl IVY
PARCEL MAP N0. 8007
'IN THE CITY OF RANCHO NCAMONCA'
9ENG A DIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE EAST U2 OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SOUTHWEST ACCORDING NI LNGE 7 WESTTSAN ERNARO NO MERID AN, TO THE OFF OFFICIAL
PLAT THEREOF
• .LNVILLE- SANOERSCN 8 ASSOCIATES
Grrl F�meer+ d yaq SwKya+
ww.
AI-5i
lk
al-20 S=DL
V
w,.�.- ¢rc�¢oe unuyrcr
N t. IR
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -98
• A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
8007 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8007), LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN WILSON AVENUE AND HILLSIDE
ROAD
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8007, submitted by Philo &
Jeanne Biane and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the west side of Hermosa
Avenue between Wilson Avenue and Hillside Road, being a division of a portion
of the east 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 114 of Section 23, T I
N, R 7 W, San Bernardino Median, according to the official plat thereof; and
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1983, a formal application was submitted
requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above- described map.
FOLLOWS:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
SECTION It That the following findings have been made:
• 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse
environments impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on July 27, 1383.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No, 3,001 is approved subject to
the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLAID NG IMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:A,.__,
Is Dennis L. Stout, Charrman
I`1 -1
Resolution No. 83 -98
Page 2
ATTEST^.'�rti, i
ecretary o t e ing >o,. '
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, JUAREZ, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
i1�
•
•
C C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
LOCATION: West side of Hermosa between TENTATIVE MAP NO. 8007
Wilson Ave. and Hillside Rd. DATE FILED: 6/21/83
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of E 1/2 of NUMBER OF LOTS: 4
SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 23, TIN, R7W GROSS ACREAGE: 17,8
S.B. B. & M. ASSESSOR PARCEL N0. 201- 083 -04
DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR
Philo & Jeanne Biane same Linville- Sanderson & Assoc.
10050 'Wilson Avenue 9587 Arrow, Suite H
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the
Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited
. to, the following:
Dedications and Vehicular Access
1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the
following streets:
11 additional feet on Wilson Ave.
9—additional feet on Hermosa Ave. equestrian
— 13t additional feet on Hillside to proviae ut imp
bo eet wide rig t -o -way.
k 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City
Standards. Radius 24 feet At Wilson and Hermosa.
9
4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be ded'cated
as follows:
5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common
roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s
and shall be recorded concurrent with the map.
.? C(
C C
X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to
be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's
requirements.
7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the •
City where sidewalks meander through private property.
Surety
% 1. Surety shall he posted and an agreemont executed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney,
guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to
-recording for Parcel No. 3 and prior to building permit
issuance for.other parcels.
2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map
for the following:
X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing
completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for
dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and
Safety Divison prior to recording for the map.
Street improvements
Pursuant to the OtY of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section
16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with the
City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map •
and /or building permit issuance,
1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited
to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches,
parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets.
2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -Foot wide
dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half -
section streets.
X 3. Construct the following missing improvements:
Prior to recordation for
Prior to building permit Issuance or of er parce s
Street Namef
f Curb &
Gutterl
A. C.
Pvmt.
Side-
Walk
Or ive Street
A r. Trees
Street
Lights
A.
overlay
Median
island*
)ther
Wilson
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Fu Fee r,
Hermosa
X
X
X
X
X
X
Hillside **
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
* includes landscaping and irrigation or meter
* *Special design
�� 1
;�ction
•
X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way,
fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained
• from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other
permits required.
X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of an encroachment permit.
X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the
relocation of any power poles or other existing public
utilities as necessary.
X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be
undergrounded,
X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs,
_ striping and markings with locations and types approved by the
City Engineer.
X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the
Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with
underground service.
10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of
building permit.
• 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.
Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards.
19
Drainage and Flood Control
X 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be
required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map.
X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal
of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer
4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage
study for the project shall be submitted to the City
Engineering for review.
5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be
constructed to detain increased runoff ..
e1
r c
Grading
X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted •
grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading
plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
licensed by the State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
or geologist and submitted at the time of application or
grading plan check.
4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval
by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to
recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of
building permit whichever comes first.
X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be subm4tted to the
Building and safety Division for approval prior to issuance of
building permit.
General Requirements and Approvals
1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
anT for
_ San •
an Bernardino f.ounty F oo Contro District
_ S
Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water
San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to
issuance of a grading permit)
Other
2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$)
approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation
of the map.
% 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage,
water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street
constructon.
X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shat. be designed to Cucamonga
County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is
required.
5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval
from Cal Trans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District,
8 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other
interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will
be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
0
X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not
guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at
the time building permits are requested. When building permits
are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be
_ asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
X 8. Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the
Trail Plan. AXIOI FRA. VXApXXXo) dXAXbdcXXk�XA )IQNft7tlX4XNl191AAXXXA7PJFAN7PW
% zIANR %XZxpR % %za%%xxaaaAkxxxx %xXXkkx4 xxangcxxfa�dtxxwXOtxuA><xx>aR
%RRNKd %NRRXN % %AXR71x1YXKRAl1 AX b�AR1dAX70RX X NAA>iJixAF %AAAAMARJF)i!X RRxRfiR
XANKNXRNXXO(%xX00k(X�XX,Rx 101ARRRxXXRKXXRRXQIIXxll9f X�XIDf X RFxNMX
X % %XRN%kxRNKxXRK01R %NXAXRNXRX
9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City
coveriny the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments
under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly creatc: parcels.
x 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be
submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets),
copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or
showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks
referenced.
x 11. Provide private easements for drainage of Parcel 1.
x 12. Provide design of drainage structure to dewater Parcel 1 to
asafe place of disposal to the satisfaction of the Building
• Offical prirr tc recordation of the map.
X 13. Construction of the drainage improvements shall be accomplished
prior to any further development on Parcel 2, 3 and 4.
x 14. Habitable dwellings on Parcel 1 must be removed or improvements
for the parcel bonded prior to recording.
9
CITY Of RANCHO CUCWNGA
LLOYD B. HUBass, CITY ENGINEER
by. �'C �.cn ✓ ,
S
0
on Cacamon6a
psn-
o
city dal tfornts
p 0• _,mon9�• ers
Fancho Out" City Co�rnci a,M� °7 Fy ant _he
p1aP nd aPPr O,,d Gi tY
pttentien' p. arcel met to the are
Fegardin9 on forth e• it t.
Sirs° anning CO tion j "tyd Je' ^tterQ'`s the
4ear the Pl the °°ndt pht ie
3o LY ii. b ect to cants tiny tht5
on rji.�n i su The aPPI t i amp Wr t
and to
parcel map .t, and as "Owners
Repo, 'don 't ied
not their inte
En9ir,eers out'Of �staN ve' and
q to
Presently r P senan eanne L'i nert p5e It Parcels ll be
retain Tae
e re
deli Snated ini
p'h in the e Engineer rather t° parcel t1, -t Piece• th TS.
pi thcu9er 4 the and; iii laPme yS• gated ° l. ion naval �r
Developer,
evel ov Any ° tQ gent eye erY st the aPP �i on aPP rcpo i
level eP 4or subs -4 a and loPers,� inyn9 pcmmt ent. to the box
resident ve a plan rcvem time e�.,
°thers as 7h cal imP at thi' 04 part �', •,e
their ,ti ding• si t appeal
ino °rcU en 4ee `we, �t ountil the o4yt iga 4Yaet we comma ,,On-.
planning
be dererred result the lqi
,which we ps a imP°`'ed by �Sem
ou] d d
sh sn 4--ndt Lions _1_s - be
pees ° -�a `he Parmust bonded P"
4allow c rr-me
t' ct n� �1 Frg ^�- , —_nt� And , on parse eel
bl
dw lltn4 is 4or
r en 4t.
-
,.Hint t =d or rovem q00 sQ• s rtn�'a_st
mP
remove 1 ed as 'n't
aPPre;amate occuPt into :l
recordxn9.,, o4 .. lot
cr r t s a small t °tn Hi`h °p lan sou d entalh iei o4 4 he roC`c:d
rnc'„ Since the at remo
top a :,:t the
:ant t.. mr >nrt. e re °�.' -tlre Parcel'
rc'r' -- level eF
se'sabl^ %•t i +t..�nent C....
tip : ^. :.a,1'. ;
to each
5Cri��CB
erY" •>ew"r n.0
pr UV tde `, n, +rr�m t -: un• ,d'snr: ;>nd Weed e�tnt for 'same
n °t equirem-
a' f th r th,iL r
".: too
•, lit ": Pr -r" .
' 10e -� ,nd til
:r f
City o' Rancho Cucamcrr.a
Fe: F'!-cel Map en'-)7
August 2. 19S7
Page Two
be eliminated entirei•; for w'arcel _.
') Street Impra_emeccg _ itsh >._
Construct the following missing improvements prier tc
recordation for Parcel (curb and gutter,
sidewail., pa•rement, trees, streetlights, etc.)
The purpose of submitting this parcel map for approval is to
enable the Bianes to sell a portion of their property while still
retaining their residence and winery. To force them to destroy
existing landscaping, remove a significant portion of producing
vineyard, and then to install the subject improvements to Parcel
3, all prior to the gale and development of at least one of the
contiguous parcels would create a harsh and ugly scar on the
• general environment. At the present time the front of Parcel
k;
is indeed pleasant to loo at. In fact, if you drive down Wilson _
at noon during the weeV, you will almost always see or 4 pc,rMvd
cars on the south side. These are people who park there to ee.c
their lunch because the immediate view of Parcel ::, is =o
pleasant. Improving only Parcel 7 would also Create an um=-' :=
"poct et" of widened street between Parcels 2 and 4. It i=_ t" -'s
requested that these improvements on Parcel 3 be deferred urt :l
either Parcel 2 or 4 is sold and developed.
I1 is my understandinq that the Planning Commi =_s_or.
recommended =pproval of the above requests 1 and 3 I have _;cde•d
request number 2 since that Lime. It is my hope that you wi 11
approve all three requests as compliance at this time would tic an
undue hardship on Mr. Blare. Since I will be out of town cn
August 17, 1 respci :t`ully reo,,.ect that this appeal be consi.:lL�red
at the first meeting in Sept�rmoer. Thank you for y^nr time
consideration.
3i nr.er el y.
!(n•t. h one Tibbett,�
agent Attorney in fart n
;'u to ..,nd Jeanne BI are
��S
K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AID PARCEL MAP 8007 - SIANE - A division of 17.9
acres into 4 parcels within the RF-725—,755 zone located on the west side
of Hermosa Avenue between 'dilson and Hillside - APN 201 - 083 -04.
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report, advising that
staff recommended that the first sentence of condition 8 of the City
Engineer's Report, under General Requirements and Approvals be added.
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.
Gary Sanderson, Linville- Sanderson, representing the applicant, addressed the
Commission stating that the applicant is in agreement with most of the items
listed in the Resolution with the exception of the requirement for street
improvements on Hillside and the requirement for construction of a sidewalk on
Hermosa. Mr. Sanderson advised that the applicant is requesting that the curb
and gutter requirements for Hillside and Hermosa be waived until parcel 1 is
sold. Further, tlIe applicant did not want to have to remove additional
vineyards due to the dedication on Hermosa.
Commissioner Mc Niel asked what the rock house is now being used for.
Janine Tibbits, daughter of the applicant, addressed the Commission and
replied that the rock house is now an occupied rental unit. She stated that
there are no sidewalks in the area and did not understand the need for
sidewalks on Hermosa and Wilson.
Mr. Rougeau replied that the sidewalk is required on Wilson because it is a
secondary highway and will be a route for school children in the area.
However, the sidewalk requirement for Hermosa is in error and should be
removed from the conditions.
Commissioner Rempel if the resolution could contain a condition that the
sidewalks be waived until such time as development occurs.
Mr. Rougeau replied that the sidewalks could be included in a lien agreement.
Ms. Tibbits stated that two rows of vineyards would have to be removed in
order to do the required improvements and did not see the reasoning behind
requiring sidewalks on Wilson and Hermosa. Further, the applicant would be
agreeable to installing these improvements when the adjacent tract begins
development, or the property is sold, as it is not his intention to develop
any of the parcels.
Commissioner Rempel advised that these are requirements which cannot be waived
by the Planning Commission, but must be appealed by the applicant to the City
Council, with the Commission's recommendation the+. they be waived.
•
Planning Commission Minutes -8- July 27, 1983
•
/ S' n
•
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Juarez, unanimously carried to adopt
Resolution 83 -98 approving Parcel Map 8007 with the deletion of the sidewalk
requirement on Hermosa and the addition of the first sentence of condition 8,
City Engineer's Report, under General Reno rements and Approvals. Further the
Commission recommended that the City Council issue lien agreements to waive
street improvements until development of the adjacent tract or if parcels 2
and 4 are built prior to the development of the tract, parcel 3 would then
have to install the improvements.
AYFS: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, JUAREZ, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
f r + «
L.
Miller Avenue between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Loop within
the Victoria Planned Community zoned for Regional Commercial - APN
227 - 161 -27, 29, 30, 32; 227 - 171 -09, 17; 227 - 221 -2, 21.
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman. Stout opened the public hearing.
Mr. Rawchuck, joint owner of a section of the parcel, expressed a concern
regarding the 11.9 acres to be dedicated for streets and and asked about his
rights as a potential property owner.
Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that signatures of all property
owners would be required prior to recordation of the final maps. At that time
if Mr. Rawchuck objected to any aspect, he could refuse to sign the map.
Mr. Rougeau stated that the property is in litigation and suggested that
possibly staff could meet with Mr. Rawchuck and discuss his concerns.
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Mc Niel, unanimously carried, to adopt
the Resolution 83 -99 approving Parcel Map 7966.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, MCNIEL, JUAREZ, REMPEL, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Planning Commission Minutes -9- July 27, 1983
7
0
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -159
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE H.D.
COUSINS HOUSE aka CHRISTMAS HOUSE AS A SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC
LANDMARK.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has adopted Chapter 9.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
relating to historic preservaLli n; and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission has
investigated the historic significance of the H. D. Cousins House aka
Christmas House and has held public hearings concerning the H. D. Cousins
House aka Christmas House in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation; and
. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has found the H. D.
Cousins House aka Christmas House to be a significant historic feature of the
City, and thereby recommends it for designation as a City Historic Landmark.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
The City Council finds and determines that the N.D. Cousins House aka
Christmas House located at 9240 Archibald Avenue, has met the criteria
established for designation as a City Historic Landmark, and therefore, and
with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates
the H. D. Cousins House aka Christmas House as E City Historic Landmark.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983•
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: a
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
19 ATTEST:
Lauren M Wasserman, City Clerk �y
u
•
PUBLISH: August 25, 1983
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will hold a public hearing on September 7, 1983 at 7:30 p.m.
in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, to consider an
Historical Landmark Designation for the H. D. Cousins House (know as the
Christmas House) located at 9240 Archibald Avenue.
All persons opposing or favoring the Historical Designation are invited
to express their views at this meeting.
Lauren M. Wasserman
City Clerk
14q
•
is
11
STAFF REPORT
a T.
DATE: September 7, 1983
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
19i� I
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: MORTGAGE BOND ISSUE FOR 1984
ABSTRACT: This report presents recommendations on filing an appli-
cation for a new housing mortgage revenue bond issue.
BACKGROUND: The previous housing mortgage bond issue was followed
by considerable interest from residential developers for another issue
on a city -wide basis. Staff has completed an inquiry of all developers
within the City who have projects that are ready for construction during
1984.
The response has shown that ten developers within the City wish to par -
ticipa -e in another housing mortgage bond issue. As in the previous
issue, it will be necessary for the City to make an application with
the California State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee in order to be
placed on a waiting list for bond allocation early next year. The fed-
eral regulations governing revenue bonds specifically for housing mort-
gages are due to expire this year. However, there is a reasonable
chance that the legislation will be extended into next year. Thus it
is wise, should the City proceed with a bond issue, to make an appli-
cation in anticipation of the continued use of revenue bonds for hous-
ing mortgages.
All developers within the City that have residential projects were
offered the opportunity to participate in the mortgage bond issue.
Ten developers have completed a program deposit application and sub-
mitted a deposit fee of one -half of one percent of their reservation
request. The total commitment is for $116 million, with individual
requests ranging from $2.6 million to $40 million. The size of the
fequest is usually scaled back by the developers or through the al-
location process. Our previous issue showed that the allocation was
approximately half the original request. In any case, there is con-
siderable interest to pursue the mortgage bond issue in this community,
Attached is a map and a description of the residential projects in
this mortgage bond issue.
190
September 1, 1983
Mortgage Bond Issue for 1984
Page Two
•
Our experience with the previous bond issue has shown that the con-
sultant team which the City used worked well with the staff and the
development community in assuring an efficient and successful bond
issue. It is recommended Chat this same consultant team be utilized
for preparation of this bond issue. Contracts for their work will
be brought to the City Council at their next meeting. As in the
previous issue, the required consultant team will be made up of an
underwriter, Stone and Youngberg; a bond counsel, Hall, Hill, Jones,
and White; a feasibility consultant, Empire Economics; and a finan-
cial advisor, Fieldman 6 Rolapo. Fees of the bond underwriter and
bond counsel, will be contingent upon the successful sale of the bond
issue. The fees of the feasibility consultant and financial advisor
are a fixed rate based upon work and expense. As in the previous
issue, all costs and administrative expense will be paid from the
program deposit fee. There will be no cost to the City other than
staff participation. Should the issue not proceed or legislation
not be enacted for renewal of the mortgage bond issues, the deposit
fees would be returned less any incurred expense.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
attached Resolution to begin the preparation of a Housing Mortgage
Bond issue which: •
1. Will direct the filing of an application and notice
Of sale of $116 million bond issue with the Califor-
nia State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee;
2. direct the City Manager to certify chat the City has
received one -half of one percent of their reservation
request;
3. authorize the execution of program deposit agreement
between the City and the developer on this mortgage
bond program (attached is a copy of the program
deposit agreement); and
4. authorize the selection of staff for the preparation
of the mortgage bond consultant team.
Re pectf 1 submitted,
�1
JACK LAM, AICP
Director of Community Development
JL:jk
Attach. Resolution •
Area Map indicating participating developers
Copy of ptuyram deposit agreement
I r1 I
0734H
r
RESOLUTION NO. )�'O J
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR
` ALLOCATION OF MORTGAGE SUBSIDY BON25 ANO
FILING OF NOTICE OF SALE THEREOF WITH MORTGAGE 80NO
ALLOCATION COMMITTEE, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
PROGRAM DEPOSIT AGREEMENTS AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS
PROPERLY RELATING THERETO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HOME MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
as follows:
WHEREAS, Chapters 1 -5 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code
of the State of California (herein called the "Act ") authorizes cities and counties
to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing home mortgages authorized by
the Act, and the Act provides a complete, additional and alternative method for
doing the things authorized thereby;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City is authorized to carry out the public
• purposes described therein by issuing its revenue bonds to acquire home mortgages
and by pledging such home mortgages as security for payment of the principal of and
interest on such revenue bonds, and by entering into any agreements in connection
therewith;
0
WHEREAS, the City proposes to undertake a Home Mortgage Financing Program
(the "Program ") to purchase loans (the "Home Mortgages ") made to finance new and
existing single-family owner-occupied residential units (the "Homes ") within the
City and to issue Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds ") to finance the purchase
of the Home Mortgages;
WHEREAS, to obtain an allocation to issue the Bonds within the federally
imposed limit upon the issuance of mortgage subsidy bonds, the City must file,
pursuant to the Costa -Marks Housing Bond Allocation Act of 1981, as amended (the
"Costa -Marks Act "), a notice of sale of the principal amount of the proposed Bonds
with the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee;
WHEREAS, in addition, in order for the City to obtain such an allocation,
the City must cause evidence of the deposit of an amount of money or letters of
credit securing such amount, which amount shall be subject to forfeiture and
application by the City to assist housing for persons of low and moderate income
within the City upon the failure to sell any or only a portion of the Bonds; and
19 z.
WHEREAS, developers within the City desire to provide the deposit required
to be made in order fir the City to obtain such an allocation, such cepusit to be
subject to the terms and conditions described in the Program Deposit Agreement in •
form presented to and reviewed by the City Council with the aid of its staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, II I5 HER-E. FCJNO, DETERMINED and CRC -eREC, as fcliows: '-
1. :Application to the State Mortgage Bord Allocation Committee for an
allocation for the Bonds under the Costa-Marks Act is hereby authorized and
approved.
2. A Notice of sale of 5116,250,000 principal amount of Bonds is hereby
ordered to be filed by the City Clerk with the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee.
3. The Program Deposit Agreements in form presented at this meeting are
hereby approved for execution and the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Program Deposit Agreements on behalf of the City with the developers
desiring to participate in the City's Program on the terms and conditions therein
provided.
4. At such time as the developers shall have complied with the deposit
requirements of the Program Deposit Agreements, the City Clerk shall cause to be
delivered to the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee a certified copy of this
resolution., together with a certificate executed by the City Manager and
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby made a part
hereof, to the effect that the City has on deposit in an interest- bearing trust
account or, to the extent applicable, has secured by letters of credit an amount
which equals 112 of 1% of the principal amount of the Bonds requested for
allocation. •
5. The staff of the City is authorized and directed to commence
implementation of a home mortgage financing program in cooperation with Fieldman,
Rolapp & Associates, Financial rrnsultants; Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional
Law Corporation, Bond Counsel; Stone & Youngberg, Underwriters; and Empire
Economics. Feasibility Consultants.
Adopted this __ day of September, 1983, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
"City Clerk
2
CERTIFICATION REGARDING NOTICE TO THE
MORTGAG% ROND ALLOCATION COMMITTEE
The' City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies to the Mortgage Bond
Allocation�Committee pursuant to the requirements of Section 50191 of the Costa=
Marks Housi*g Bond Allocation Act of 1981 (the "Costa -Marrs Act "), as follows:
1. The City did by Resolution adooted on September , 1983, order the
filing with the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee of a notice of sale and request
for grant to the City an allocation of mortgage subsidy bonds in the amount of
$116,250,000.
2. The City has on deposit ir, an interest bearing trust account or has
secured by appropriate letters of credit an amount equal to 112 of 1 percent of the
dollar amount set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, which deposit is subject to the
forfeiture provisions of the Costa -Marks Act.
3. The City requests the grant of an entitlement allocation or 520,000,000
and a supplemental allocation of 596,250,000.
4, The City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been duly
authorized and directed to execute and deliver this Certification pursuant to
resolution of the City duly adopted on September _, 1983. A certified copy of said
resolution accompanies this Certification.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
City Manager
Date: September _, 1983
Exhibit A
I q v
1984 MORTGAGE BOND PARTICIPANTS
•
DEVELOPER PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION RESERVATION
(Name and Address) (Units & Price Range)
1.
Alta Loma Woods
NEC Hellman & 19th
Townhomes
S2.6 million
3401 A E. Chapman
TT 12305
S75- 85,000
Orange, CA 92669
Attn: Charles Roy
2.
Crowell Ind.
SEC Turner & Arrow
Townhomes
$5.0 million
521 N. Mountain
IT 11915
S65- 80,000
Suite A
3.
Upland, CA 91786
Highland E. of Sapphire
Single Fam.
Otchd.
Attn: Jim Gray
IT 9321
$90- 100,000
4.
Wm. Lyon Company
Baseline & Etiwanda
Single Fam.
Dtchd.
$20.0 million
19 Corporate Plaza
IT 11934
$65- 951000
Newport Beach, CA
Attn: R. Frankel
S.
Laguna Pacific Dev.
NWC Church & Hellman
Single Fam.
Dtchd.
$7.0 million
4299 MacArthur Blvd.
IT 12238
$90- 100,000
Suite 105
Newport Beach, CA
*Attn: Daryl Wright
6.
M.J. Brock & Sons
SEC 19th & Archibald
Single Fam.
Dtchd
$4.0 million
6767 Forest Lawn Dr.
TT 11173
S85- 95,000
Los Angeles, CA
Attn: Thos. Tyrell
7.
Marlborough Dev..Corp
SEC Archibald & Church
Townhomes
S20.0 million
2209 Century park, E.
IT 11663
$75- 90,000
Suite 1550
Las Angeles, CA
Attn: Michael Romeo
8.
USA Properties
NEC Feron & Archibald
Townhomes
$4.0 million
1801 Wilshire Blvd.
IT 12090
S80- 951000
Santa Monica CA
Attn: Surinder Kahlon
9.
Lewis Homes
SEC Baseline & Haven
Single Fam.
Dtchd.
$40.0 million
P. 0. Box 670
Terra Vista
$55- 75,000
Upland, CA 91186
Attn: John Goodman
10.
Anden Group
NEC Arrow & Turner
Townhomes
55.25 million
629 Covina Blvd.
TT 12040
$70- 85,000
is
San Dimas, CA 91773
11.
TAC Rev. Corp.
Vineyard N. of Arrow
Townhomes
$8.4 million
7333 Hellman
S60- 85,000
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Attn: Terry Christiansen
TOTAL REQUEST
.2 mi ion
.c 3
lu. OD
-2,K,
5
t I-
I
J1
CO
co
ab 2
-1
0
M
fry Z
0
2
ca
0 c 0
a.
z
0
C
m
1]
KI
v
06b4H
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HOME MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS
PROGRAM OEoOSIT AGREEMENT
This Program Deposit Agreement (the "Agreement ") is entered into this
day of , 198 , by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the
Cis tyrand (the "Developer "):
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Chapters 1 -5 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code
of the State of California (herein called the "Act ") authorizes cities and counties
to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing home mortgages authorized by
the Act, and the Act provides a complete, additional and alternative method for
doing the things authorized thereby;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City is authorized to carry out the public
purposes described therein by issuing its revenue bonds to acquire home mortgages
and by pledging such home mortgages as security for payment of the principal of and
interest on such revenue bonds, and by entering into any agreements in connection
therewith:
• WHEREAS, the City proposes to undertake a Home Mortgage Financing Program
(the "Program ") to purchase loans (the "Home Mortgages ") made to finance new and
existing single-family owner - occupied residential units (the "Homes ") within the
City, and to issue Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds ") to finance the
purchase of the Home Mortgages:
0
WHEREAS, the Developer is in the process of subdividing land within the City
and intends to construct and market new single- family residential units thereon and
desires to reserve a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds to provide funds to
purchase Home Mortgages made with respect thereto;
WHEREAS, in order to obtain an allocation to issue the Bonds within the
federally imposed limit upon the issuance of mortgage subsidy bonds, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga must file, pursuant to the Costa -Marks Housing Bond Allocation Act
of 1981, as amended (the "Costa-Marks Act "), a notice of sale of the prin.-.ipal
amount of the prapcs =.d Bonds with the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee;
WHEREAS, in addition, the City must cause evidence of the deposit of an
amount of money or a letter of credit securing such amount, which amount shall be
subject to the hereinafter described forfeiture upon the failure to sell any or
only a portion of the Bonds;
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to provide a portion of the deposit required
to be made in order for the City to obtain an allocation from the Mortgage Bond
Allocation Committee, such deposit to be subject to the terms and coneitions •
hereinafter described and as required by the Mortgage Bonc Allocation Corsiittee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein set forth,
and for other good and valuable consideration it is hereoy agreed as follows:
1. The Developer hereby reserves that portion of the proceeds of the Bonds
sufficient to provide funds to purchase S principal amount of Home
Mortgages to be made with respect to Homes to be constructed and sold by the
Developer and with respect to existing Homes to be marketed by the Developer ana
"I.-IIWIR pro rata to fund any required reserve funds and to pay Bond issuance costs (the
"Reservation "). Prior to the offering of the Bonds by the underwriters to its
syndicate or selling group, the Developer shall, with re;oect to the Reservation,
enter into a Commitment Contract (and Reservation of runes), s"b :tantiaily in the
form hereinafter reien ed to.
2. The Developer has, together with this Program Deposit Agreement,
delivered cash in an amount which is not less than one-half of one percent (1/2 of
1;) of the Developer's Reservation or an irrevocable letter of credit (the "Letter
of Credit "), substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby
made a part hereof, securing payment to the Agency of an amount which is not less
than one -half of one percent (1/2 of 1:) of the Developer's Reservation. The
Developer shall be permitted at any time to substitute such a Letter of Credit for
any cash previously delivered to the City pursuant to this Program Deposit
Agreement and, upon such substitution, the City shall refund such cash to the
Developer.
3. The total amount paid by the Developer in cash or, if applicable, the •
amount secured by the Letter of Credit, is the Developer's program deposit (the
"Deposit ") and, if a grant of an allocation shall be received by the City, the
Deposit shall be forfeited by the Developer (in the amount and in the manner
required by the Costa -Marks Act) and shall be used by the City to assist housing for
persons of low and moderate income within the City in the event that:
(a) The Bonds are not sold within the time period specified in the
Costa-Marks Act based on the grant of the allocation for the Bonds by the Mortgage
Bond Allocation Committee; or
(b) After the grant of such an allocation, one day prior to the date
of the expiration of any letter of credit posted by the Developer; or
(c) The Developer shall fail to execute a Commitment Contract (and
Reservation of funds), substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "8" and
hereby made a part hereof, prior to the offering of the Bonds by the underwriters to
members of its syndicate or selling group, or the Developer shall fail to perform
in accordance with the provisions of such Commitment Contract (and Reservation of
Funds), including, without limitation, failure by the Developer to pay required
program participation fees or to past required letters of credit.
•
f 9 (o
4. It is understood that the City will first apply that portion of the
• forfeited Deposit to the payment of costs incurred in connection with the proposed
issuance of the Bonds to the extent permitted under the provisions of the Costa -
Marks Act. It is further understood that upon issuance of the Bonds, the Program
Deposit will be credited in full toward payment of the Developer's prooram
participation fee subject to the requirements of the Commitment Contract (and
Reservation of Funds).
5, It is further understood that the City will use its best efforts to
cause the Bonds to be sold within the period specified in the Costa -Marks Act based
on the grant of the allocation by the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee subject,
in all respects, to completion of proceedings for the issuance of the Bonds to the
satisfaction, of the City as the City shall, in its sole discretion, determine. The
City shall be under no obligation to request any extension of the allocation by the
Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee or to request waiver or reduction by the
Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee in any Deposit forfeiture. The execution of
this Agreement by the City shall, under no circumstances, be deemed to constitute
an approval of or obligation to approve any other matter relating to the Developer
which may come before the City Council or be subject to the approval of the City.
6. The cash portion of the Deposit shall be deposited by the City in an
Interest bearing trust account and the interest thereon shall, from time to time as
such interest shall become available, be paid by the trustee of such account to the
Developer.
7. In the event that the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee shall not have
granted an allocation to the City for such Bonds by July 1, 1984, the Deposit shall
• be returned to the Developer, less an amount equal to the Developer's pro rata
share of expenses theretofore incurred by the City. The Developer's share of
expenses shall be prorated based on the ratio of the Developer's Reservation to all
reservations of the proceeds of the Bonds in the Program.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have caused this agreement to
be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.
CI-Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
Mayor
By
nsert tit e
1 11
0664H
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON9A
HOME MORTGAGE REVENUE b,,iDS
PROGRAM DEPOSIT AGREEMENT
This Program Deposit Agreement (the "Agreement ") is entered into this
day of 198 , by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonaa (the
'City" and (the "Developer "):
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Chapters 1 -5 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code
of the State of California (herein called the "Act ") authorizes cities and counties
to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing home mortgages authorized by
the Act, and the Act provides a complete, additional and alternative method for
doing the things authorized thereby;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City is authorized to carry out the public
purposes described therein by issuing its revenue bonds to acquire home mortgages
and by pledging such home mortgages as security for payment of the principal of and
interest on such revenue bonds, and by entering into any agreements in connection
therewith;
WHEREAS, the City proposes to undertake a Home Mortgage Financing Program
(the "Program ") to purchase loans (the "Home Mortgages ") made to finance new and
existing single- family owner-occupied residential units (the "Homes ") within the •
City, and to issue Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds ") to finance the
purchase of the Home Mortgages;
WHEREAS, the Developer is in the process of subdividing land within the City
and intends to construct and market new single-family residential units thereon and
desires to reserve a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds to provide funds to
purchase Home Mortgages made with respect thereto;
WHEREAS, in order to obtain an allocation to issue the Bonds within the
federally imposed limit upon the issuance of mortgage subsidy bonds, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga must file, pursuant to the Costa -Marks Housing Bond Allocation Act
of 1981, as amended (the "Costa -Marks Act "), a notice of sale of the orin.ipal
amount of the proposed Bonds with the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee;
WHEREAS, in addition, the City must cause avidence of the deposit of an
amount of money or a letter of credit securing such amount, which amount shall be
subject to the hereinafter described forfeiture upon the failure to sell any or
only a portion of the Bonds;
r, 5
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to provide a portion of the deposit required
• to be made in order for the City to obtain an allocation from the Mortgage Bond
Allocation Committee, such deposit to be subject to the terms and conditions
hereinafter described and as required by the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee;
C J
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein set forth,
and for other good and valuable consideration it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. The Developer hereby reserves that portion of the proceeds of the Bonds
sufficient to provide funds to purchase 4 principal amount of Home
Mortgages to be made with respect to Homes to be constructed and sold by the
Developer and with respect to existing Homes to be marketed by the Developer and
pro rata to fund any required reserve funds and to pay Bond issuance costs (the
"Reservation "). Prior to the offering of the Bonds by the underwriters to its
syndicate or selling group, the Developer shall, with respect to the Reservation,
enter into a Commitment Contract (and Reservation of Funds), substantially in the
form hereinafter referred to.
2. The Developer has, togethe
delivered cash in an amount which is nol
1 %) of the Developer's Reservation or an
of Credit "), substantially in the form
made a part hereof, securing payment to
than "ne -half of one percent (1/2 of
Developer shall be permitted at any time
any cash previously delivered to the
Agreement and, upon such substitution,
Developer.
r with this Program Deposit Agreement,
less than one -half of one percent (1/2 of
irrevocable letter of credit (the "Letter
attacned hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby
the Agency of an amount which is not less
1 %) of the Developer's Reservation. The
to substitute such a Letter of Credit for
City pursuant to this Program Deposit
the City shall refund such cash to the
3. The total amount paid by the Developer in cash or, if applicable, the
amount secured by the Letter of Credit, is the Developer's program deposit (the
"Deposit ") and, if a grant of an allocation shall be received by the City, the
Deposit shall be forfeited by the Developer (in the amount and in the manner
required by the Costa-Marks Act) and shall be used by the City to assist housing for
persons of low and moderate income within the City in the event that:
(a) The Bonds are not sold within the time period specified in the
Costa -Marks Act based on the grant of the allocation for the Bonds by the Mortgage
Bond Allocation Committee; or
(b) After the grant of such an allocation, one day prior to the date
of the expiration of any letter of credit posted by the Developer; or
(c) The Developer shall fail to execute a commitment Contract (and
Reservation of Funds), substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and
hereby made a part hereof, prior to the offering of the Bonds by the underwriters to
members of its syndicate or selling group, or the Developer shall fail to perform
in accordance with the provisions of such Commitment Contract (and Reservation of
Funds), including, without limitation, failure by the Oe :cl. ^_per to pay required
program participation fees or to post required letters of credit.
(0 Q
4. It is understood that the City will first apply that portion of the
forfeited Deposit to the payment of costs incurred in connection with the proposed •
issuance of the Bonds to the extent permitted under the provisions of the Costa -
Marks Act. It is further understood that upon issuance of the Bonds, the program
Deposit will be credited in full toward payment of the Developer's program
participation fee subject to the requirements of the Commitment Contract (and
Reservation of Funds).
5. It is further understood that the City will use its best efforts to
cause the donds to be sold within the period specified in the Costa -Marks Act based
on the grant of the allocation by the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee subject,
in all respects, to completion of proceedings for the issuance of tFe Bonds to the
satisfaction of the City as the City shall, in its sole discretion, determine. The
City shall be under no obligation to request any extension of the allocation by the
Mortgage Bord Allocation Committee or to request waiver or reduction by the
Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee in any Deposit forfeiture. The execution of
this Agreement by the City shall, under no circumstances, be deemed to constitute
an aproval of or
before the City Council eor any othr be subjecta to the eapproval of the City eveloper
6. The cash portion of the Deposit shall be deposited by the City in an
interest bearing trust account and the interest thereon shall, from time to time as
such interest shall become available, be paid by the trustee of such account to the
Developer.
have
7. In the event that the Mortgage Bond Allocation Com�m8ittee hall si tt shall
granted an allocation to the City for such Bonds by July 1,
to the Developer's pro
r
be 4 ee Developer,
eretofore incurred by the
less an a nq
share o expenses city. The Developer's share a of •
expenses shall be prorated b t
asedon Bonds tiotof the Developer's Reservation to all of the
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have caused this agreement to
be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
By
Trnse�t tit e
'10
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA &&-1401
MEMORANDUMt� %;
f
'x
August 11, 1983
1977
TO: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
FROM: Robert Rizzo
Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: Requested Residential Rubbish Rate Increase
Attached please find two letters from Rancho and Yukon disposal services.
They are requesting the City Council consider a 500 per month increase on
residential rubbish rates to become effective October 1, 1983. The present
rates would be effected in the following manner.
Present Present Requested Requested
Monthly 3 -month Monthly 3-month
Rubbish service area rate rate rate rate
• South of Banyan 6.45 19.35 6.95 20.85
North of Banyan 7.15 21.45 7.65 22.95
As you are aware, this rate adjustment is in response to the County's raising
the solid waste disposal fee from $3.50 per ton to $5.85 per ton ($2.35 per
ton increase), also commencing October 1, 1983.
The companies' requested rate increase reflects an overall 7.8$ (500)
increase, however 78% (390) of the increase can be directly attributed to the
tonnage adjustment by the County. The calculation of this would work as
follows:
0 Average residential customer generates 2.0 tons rubbish annually
• Increase is $2.35 per ton
0 12 months in a year
2.0 (tons) x $2.35 (dump rate increase) _ $4.80 : 12 months $ .392
This would leave 110 (1.6$) for the rate increase to cover the cost of such
items as gasoline, machinery, automotive parts, and other operating expenses.
In regard to the present rate structure this seems to be a very reasonable
request.
tta
A ch
Attachments
eat
YVKO#
iz�, DISPOSAL Sawa - .: `y
P.O. 4oc 1 Alb Loma, California 91701 • Tdophone 17141 947 -2410
J
August 5, 1983
Robert Rizzo
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
RE: Refuse rate adjustment
Dear Mr. Rizzo,
IFEVEIVLC
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAW,,,NLA
ADMINISTRATION
AUG 11 1983
AM
718I91nIUI2I1I2A4V516
I
As you know the County Board u. ':per%'isors increased solid
waste disposal fees effective October 1, 1981 from $3.50 to
$5.85 per ton. This large an increase will have a large fin-
ancial impact on this company.
Due to these increases, Yukcn Disposal is requesting a refuse
rate adjustment of $ .50 per month for our residential customers.
Please put this request on the City Council's agenda for consid-
eration as soon as possible.
If you have any questions or would like to meet regarding this
matter, please feel free to call.
Slncerel ypur /
4.'�
Joseph L. Avak ion
JLA /cp
r 0 'a-
.
UJIMO DISPOSAL fl P.O. Box 959
CI�CSI MCa f Ph" (7 4) 987.37177D
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. BOX 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA
ADMINISTRMTION
AIJG 111983
7 �S19�nI)1i1Z�112�st4�518
August 10, 1981
Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman -City Nanager
Honora'ale Mayor and Members of the City Councilt
Rancho Disposal makes application for an increase in
the rate of charge for collection and disposal of solid
waste from residential dwelling units inside the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
The County of San Bernardino raised the disposal fee
I
rom 33.50 per ton to 55.85 per ton at all county land-
fills commencing October 1, 1953. Attached is the County
refuse rate adjustment guidelines calling for a 2.581
increase in operating costs and 352 per month increase
in the residential rate to recover the added dumping cost.
Please consider and approve our request to increase
residential rates $.SO per month (7.81,5) effective October
1, 1983.
Thanks for your consideration and cooperation. Please
be aware of our continuing desire to provide the best
possible service at the lowest cost to our customers.
Respectfully,
Rancho Disposal Service, Inc.
n
CCooie Burr
Secretary /Treasurer
,01)
•
•
June 27, 1983
Board of Realtors
217 East "A" Street
Upland, California 91786
Attention: Nary Ellingwood, President
Dear Mary:
The attached amendment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga business license
ordinance was prepared as a result of the concerns expressed by the
Board of Realtors.
• The primary purpose of the amendment is to specifically exclude indivi-
dual sales representatives from the requirement to have a business license.
The trade -off is that brokers will be required to pay business license taxes
on all sales made within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. After many dis-
cussions with realtors and brokers, it was our view that the gross receipts
taxes were more applicable to brokers than to individual sales representa-
tives.
If you have any problems with the ordinance amendment, or if you want to
discuss it, please contact me. We have scheduled the amendment for City
Council consideration on Wednesday, July 6, 1983.
Sincerely
L'a ren M. Wasserman
City Manager
I.MIJ:baa
attach.
cc: City Council
fan RASF,LINF. ROAD, SUITE C • POSTOFFICE BOX Bql • RANFIIO CICA71t1NCA, CurnRNIA 91730 (7111 sP94ea1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Jon 0. Mikd,
•
rI....iw..•...
Charlee J. II Front
Richare N. Dahl Phillip II. ScM1i neon
M. Nh ilh, 1 .
197' s
June 27, 1983
Board of Realtors
217 East "A" Street
Upland, California 91786
Attention: Nary Ellingwood, President
Dear Mary:
The attached amendment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga business license
ordinance was prepared as a result of the concerns expressed by the
Board of Realtors.
• The primary purpose of the amendment is to specifically exclude indivi-
dual sales representatives from the requirement to have a business license.
The trade -off is that brokers will be required to pay business license taxes
on all sales made within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. After many dis-
cussions with realtors and brokers, it was our view that the gross receipts
taxes were more applicable to brokers than to individual sales representa-
tives.
If you have any problems with the ordinance amendment, or if you want to
discuss it, please contact me. We have scheduled the amendment for City
Council consideration on Wednesday, July 6, 1983.
Sincerely
L'a ren M. Wasserman
City Manager
I.MIJ:baa
attach.
cc: City Council
fan RASF,LINF. ROAD, SUITE C • POSTOFFICE BOX Bql • RANFIIO CICA71t1NCA, CurnRNIA 91730 (7111 sP94ea1
P
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA, •
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SUBSECTION A5 OF SECTION
5.04.290 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO CLAP.Ioo '" 117, MEANING OF GROSS RECEIPTS
Or' REAL ESTATE BROKERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF
BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES.
The City Council of the City of Ran %no Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION i Subsection A5 of Section 5.04.290 of the Rancho
C>ucam.onca Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"5. In the case of real estate brokers maintaininc
an office within the city, all real estate commissions
will be included when reporting the gross receipts of
the business except such portion of gross receipts re-
flectina sales made of real property out of the city
where the outside sales are required to be reported and
business license paid thereon to another community. In
the case of real estate brokers maintaining an office
within the city, gross receipts shall not be reduced
because of any compensation paid, directly or indirectly,
to a real estate sales person licensed under such broker. •
In the case of real estate brokers not maintaining an
uffice within the city only real estate salesmen's com-
missions from sales of real property within the city
shall be reported as gross receipts. ",
and in all other respects, Section 5.04.290 of the Rancho Cuca;,onga
Municipal Code shall remain the same.
SECTION 2: Section 1 of this Ordinance shall become effective
on the thirtieth day following the adoption of this ordinance, or
on January 1, 1984, whichever is later,
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be pulblishod with..n fifteen (15) days after its passage,
at least r : ii The Dailv _Report, a newspaper of general circula-
tion, p::blic:'•ed in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
PASS£11, APPROVED, and , DOPTED this day of
1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: 18
ATTEST: MAYOR
CITY CLERK
o 'lj
ORDINANCE NO.
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SUBSECTION A5 OF SECTION
5.04.290 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO CLARIFY THE CEF.NING OF GROSS RECEIPTS
OF REAL ESTATE BROKERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF
BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Subsection A5 of Section 5.04.290 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Punicipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
115. In the case of real estate brokers maintaining
an office within the city, all real estate commissions
will be included when reporting the gross receipts of
the business except such portion of gross receipts re-
flecting sales made of real property out of the city
where the outside sales are required to be reported and
business license paid thereon to another community. In
the case of real estate brokers maintaining an office
within the city, gross receipts shall not be reduced
• because of any compensation paid, directly or indirectly,
to a real estate sales person licensed under such broker.
In the case of real estate brokers not maintaining an
office within the city only real estate salesmen's com-
missions from sales of real property within the city
shall be reported as gross receipts. ",
and in all other respects, Section 5.04.290 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code shall remain the same.
SECTION 2; Section 1 of this Ordinance shall become effective
on the thirtieth day following the adoption of this Ordinance, or
on January 1, 1904, whichever is later.
SECTICN 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage,
at least once in The Daily Reyort, a newspaper of general circula-
tion, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1903.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
n
u
•
n TMn nt. n A ATOUA nr TO A T.fnATnn
STAFF REPORT
September 7, 1983
TO: City Manager and City Council
FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Administr2tive Analyst
SUBJECT: Cable Television Status Report
During the past few years, there has been very little interest on the part of
cable television (CATV) companies to extensively expand service areas in
Rancho Cucamonga (24% of residential units have CATV). This has been because
the cost to cable the uncabled portions of the city would have been very
prohibitive. Moreover, the three CATV companies operating in town (Cable TV
of Alta Loma, Group W, and Acton) were granted their licenses to operate from
the county prior to incorporation, and are working under a county code (Title
4, Division 2, Chapter 5, Sections adopted 12/31/76)• The City
adopted this code by reference in March of 1978 (Ordinance 17). Since that
time the County hai rescinded this code and adopted an entirely new CATV
ordinance in June, 1982, which has been amended three times in the past year.
The recent housing development resurgence has brought the potential for a
greater CATV subscriber base in Rancho Cucamonga. Thus prompting interest on
the part of some "non - lioensed" CATV companies to build in Rancho Cucamonga.
Before these prospective companies would be permitted to proceed, a license
would need to be granted by the City Council. However, the "ground rules" we
have in place are outdated, and do not address the present CATV needs of the
community. There are no provisions for public access programing, level of
service, type of service, or many other "state of the art" features of CATV.
Additionally, this county code was intended to serve the entire county and not
Just the particular needs of one community.
With the prospect of CATV companies wishing to serve Rancho Cucamonga, it
appears to be the appropriate time to establish some definite " ground rules"
specifically for our community's needs. Approaching CATV in this manner will
allow Rancho Cucamonga the opportunity to evaluate the CAN needs and desires
of the entire City -- seeing that CATV is available to all residents, requiring
a certain "state of the art" level of service is offered, and monitoring
subscriber charges.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council place a moratorium on granting any
CATV licens_- within Rancho Cucamonga, and direct staff to develop and submit
to the City Council for consideration a plan of action in proceeding with the
matter of establishing a CATV ordinance aimed at serving the needs of all
Rancho Cucamonga residents.
'0f.,
LI
rrmV nW PAN10T40 r.1T(.AMONCA _,�AU-
STAFF REPORT Vol
i
y T
June 23, 1983I! z
F � Z
19J] J
TO: James H. Robinson
Assistant City Manager
FROM: Robert A. Rizzo
Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: Status Cable TV in Rancho Cucamonga
At this time there are three (3) cable television (CATV) companies operating
in Rancho Cucamonga; they are working under a non - exclusive license granted
prior to incorporation by the County. This license does not specify ievels of
service or define service areas. Henceforth, CATV companies are only
providing service in areas where it is economically feasible (i.e., where
lines exist and extension from main lines can be installed without substantial
cost - -some subdivisions have been pre - wired, however do not have service
because main lines are not in the close proximity and major improvements would
be necessary). Additionally, under this existing license there is no way to
require CATV service.
The three CATV companies operating are Cable TV of Alta Loma (2,427
subscribers), Group W (948 subscribers), Acton (approximately 700
subscribers). Listed below are the services offered by each CATV company (see
Appendix A for general areas of service):
Cable TV of Alta Loma
•17 Channel System
- All local VHF A UHF
- One Movie Channel (Showtime)
- Video News Board
- Public Notice Message Board
Group N
429 Channel System
- Local VHF A UHF
- Four Movie Channels (HBO, Showtime, Z,
- The Movie Channel)
- ESPN (24 hour sports)
- MfBS (Atlanta Superstation)
- CCN (24 News Programming)
- Public Message Board
- MTV (24 hour Music "flock ")
Continued....
Status Cable TV
Advisory Commission Meeting
C June 23, 1983
Page 2
Acton
117 Channel System
- Local VHF A UHF
- One Movie Channel (HBO)
- ESPN (24 hour sports)
- wTBS (Atlanta Superstation)
- CCN (24 News Programming)
The major CATV question in Rancho Cucamonga since inception has been, "How do
we get CATV in "on- cabled areas?" In regards to this, we are in a "Catch 22"
situation:
A. City has no authority to require existing
companies to cable non - cabled areas.
B. Non - cabled areas are financially prohibitive for
any CATV company.
E
C. Federal legislation to deregulate and change
"ground rules" for cities granting licenses is
about to become law (see Appendix B).
Rancho Cucamonga's key to gaining CATV for the entire community is •
development. As it stands now, our market is not large enough to attract CATV
to complete the non - cabled areas. Once Terra Vista and Victoria start to take
shape, then the number of potential subscribers will be sufficient to expand
CATV service.
HAH:mk
Attachments
)1
•
C�
cl
APPENDIX A
CABLE TV SERVICE AREAS (R--ho Cucamonom
= Cable TV of Alta Loma
I� r r rt:o w
•) I.,
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GpCAAip)
STAFF REPORT'
- 197
August 31, 1983
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official qL�
SUBJECT: SWIMMING POOL FENCING lam/
Background: In January 1981, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 122
which included provisions for fencing of swimming pools. (By definition,
a "swimming pool is any body of water created by artifical means, designed
or used for swimming, immersion or therapeutic purposes ", thereby including
spas and hot tubs). The ordinance replaced prior San Bernardino County
rules which allowed an enclosure 4' in height. Under the current regulations,
swimming pools exceeding 18" in depth, require protective enclosure not less
than 5'6" in height.
The unusual height was recommended by the staff to provide maximum protection
and yet provide for limited flexibility in design, considering zoning
ordinance fence height limit of 6' in residential zones. In other words,
the intent of the current regulations was to encourage 6' fencing but provide
workable tolerances considering certain construction methods, terrain differ-
entials and the zoning ordinance maximum. Since adoption of the requirements,
some 700 swimming pools and spas have been installed in the city utilizing
current provisions.
Analysis: During review of the City Council referral, we contacted a local
coutrac —r, the southwest representative of the National Spa and Pool Institute,
and 11 local governmental agencies to establish current regulatory trends and
to determine if pool and spa safety could be considered differentially with
regard to enclosure heights. Industry contacts do not take any position as to
recommend fence height, but leave the matter to legislative agencies. None of
our governmental contacts consider spas and pools independently, but minimum
fencing heights do vary somewhat from one jurisdiction to another.
Data collected from 11 other government agencies indicate a strong majority
(8) require 5' high fencing; three (3) allow 4' enclosures. Critical water
depth (requiring fencing) varies to as much as 24" deep with most jurisdictions
grouped at 16" to 18" depth (see attached listing).
✓l0
Staff Report
Subject: Swimming Pool Fencing
Page 2
Recommendation: Based upon the preponderant minimum height of 5' in •
surrounding jurisdictions and the City Attorney's recommendation of uniform
heights for ease of administration, it is recommended that the building
regulations be revised to reduce required pool and spa fencing height from
5'6" to 5101,
It has been our practice, in adopting building regulations, to advise
interested industry members of pending changes so that their input may
be received.
A hearing date of October 19th would allow adequate time for notification
and for industry response regarding the change. If the City Council is
desirous of effecting a change, it would be appropriate to direct the staff
to publish notice of intention to adopt the ordinance and set a date of
October 19th for the public hearing.
JRG: 11
'. I !
11
•
• 9/1/83
REQUIRED FENCE HEIGHTS FOR SWIMMING POOLS /SPAS
:12
MINIMUM DEPTH
FENCE HEIGHT
CITY
REQUIRING FENCE
REQUIREMENT
CHINO
18"
5' -0"
CLAREMONT
16"
5' -0"
• CORONA
24"
5' -0"
FONTANA
24"
5' -0"
ONTARIO
No Minimum Depth
5' -0"
POMONA
18"
5' -0"
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
18"
5' -6"
REDLANDS
18"
4' -0"
RIALTO
No Minimum Depth
5' -0"
SAN BERNARDINO CITY
No Minimum Depth
4' -0"
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
18"
4' -0"
UPLAND
18"
5' -0"
:12
(% t
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RNACHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING THE
MINIM'N HEIGHT FOR SWIMMING POOL FENCING
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Sec. 15.12.10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
amended to read as follows:
Sec. 15.12. 110 Section 1107 added Swimming pool fencing.
Chapter 11 of the Uniform Building Code is
amended by adding Section 1107 to read as follows:
Section 1107(a), Every person in possession of land within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, either as owner, purchaser
under contract, lessee, tenant, licensee, or otherwise,
upon which is situated a swimming pool, having a water depth
exceeding 18 ", shall at all times maintain on the lot or
premises upon which such pool is located and completely
surrounding such pool, lot or premises, a fence or other
structure not less than five feet (5' -0 ") in height with no
opening therein, other than doors or gates, having a greater
dimension exceeding four inches (4 "). Openings may exceed
4" in greatest dimension when approved by the Building Official,
• provided such openings will not materially facilitate scaling
the fence or other structure by children.
All gates or doors opening through such enclosure shall be
equipped with a self - closing and self - latching device designed
to keep and capable of keeping such door or gate securely
closed at all times when not in actual use, however, the
door of any dwelling occupied by human beings and forming any
part of the enclosure herein above required need not he so
equipped. Regufred latching devices shall be located not less
than four feet six inches (4' -6 ") above the ground. The pool
enclosure shall be in place and approved by the Building Official
before water is placed in the pool.
EXCEPTION: The provisions of this Section shall not apply to
public swimming pools for which a charge or admission price
is required to be paid for use thereof, during the time that
the owner, operator or adult employee of such owner or operator
is present at and in active charge of the premises upon which
such pool is located.
Section 11070). Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection
(a) any fencing serving as enclosure for a swimming pool, lawfully
in existence on the date of adoption of this ordinance, and
meeting the requirements for fencing in effect at the time of
construction of the swimming pool, may continue; however, any
replacement in whole or in part shall comply with the requirements
is of subsection (a).
13
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall •
cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1983
AYES:
NOES:
AACENT:
ATTEST
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
n �
al
•
f
U
. M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney
DATE: August 10, 1983
RE: Swimming Pool Fences
At the request of the Council I have reviewed State law and
I have found no provision thereof pertaining to a City's authority
to regulate the heights of fences around swimming pools.
It would appear within the City's authority to reduce the
minimum height of zw'.mming pool enclosure fences from 5 112 feet to
5 feet.
• For ease of administration I recommend that Council consider
applying a uniform height regulation to all swimming pools and spas.
RED:sju
cc: Jack Lain, Director of Community Development
CC: Jerry R. Grant, Building Official
lI5