Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/10/05 - Agenda Packet• <� 1 s F}- Z U > 1977 Cin OF RAANNCM C�UCXNXX X-A /11I/OUI UL 1/E {1 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California October 5, 1983 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda slat be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Buquet , Dahl _, Frost • Schlosser __, and Mikels C. gnproval of Minutes: None submitted. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Thursday, October 6, 7:00 P.M. - HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMI3SION - Lions Park Community Center. B. Wednesday, October 12, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. C. Thursday, Octobc,- 20, 7:00 P.I. - PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Lions Park Community Center. * D. Pre.:entati on of Service Recognition Awards. 3- CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. A. Alproval of Warrants, Register No. 83- 10 -05, and Payroll 1 dated 9 -18 -83 in the total amount of $194,822.99. B. Forward Claim against the City by William H, Smith to v the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. • City Council Agenda Page 2 October 5, 1983 C. Forward Claim against the City by Anton J. and Mary L. 5 • Blatnick to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. D. Forward Claim against the City by Morris V. Farinella to 6 the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. E. Foward Claim against the City by Charles Mancha to the 7 City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. F. Request approval of Parcel Map 7853, bonds, and 9 agreement submitted by Ron Martin and Associates, located on the west side of Hellman, north side of Church Street. RESOLUTION NO. 83-167 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7853, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. G. Recommend approval of Real Property Improvement Contract 19 and Lien Agreement and release of previously submitted bonds and agreement for Development Review 81 -05 submitted by Ameron, Inc. • Faithful Performance Bond $54,000 Labor 6 Material Bond $27,000 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -168 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT AND RELEASING PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BONDS AND AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 81 -05. H. Request approval of Release of Bonds for Tract 9435, 26 located north of Victoria and east of Haven Avenue, and issuance of a Notice of Completion. Owner: Crismar Development. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $117,000 • City Council Agenda Page 3 October 5, 1983 • RESOLUTIO NO. 83 -169 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 9435 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. I. Approval to upgrade current copy equipment to more heavy 29 duty and more efficient system. Recommendation is to divest ourselves of the two IBM III copiers located in Administration and Community Development and replace them with Kodak 150s. 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ORDERING WORK IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 31 DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 7349• It is recommended that City Council approve the resolution ordering the work in connection with Parcel Map 7349, located on the north side of 4th Strcet, east of Route 15 freeway. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, Cicy Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -112 32 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT. (PM 7349). B. ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EASTAAM ALLEY LOCATED 37 BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -170 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, .STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO RE VACATED AN EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES. 5• NON- ADVERTIZED PUBLIC HEARINGS No item; uubmitted. 13 City Council Agenda Page U October 5, 1983 6. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS A. SCHEDULING OF BUDGET ADOPTION MEETING. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. T. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT • • E RE67 CIT$o RANCHO CLCIMONGA PARR 1 1 V E N C O A V A M E ._ 19886 5276 INTI. C]NE BLOC OFFICIAL 14213 19213 19214 19215 192178 19218 1V219 Iv22O 9221 13222 1922 3 1 ^224 19225 102:6 1,227 13228 19229 19230 _ 19231 10232 JO 2 6 A CONSTRUCTI]'1 216 VANK CF leiRICA NT C SA 1430 C:ST CFFICE PRJCUCTS 1540 '6ARCR00• Cdr RS 1797 EISINE5S CLVCUTEi SISTE 1900 C .L6ISEERINL ZJIU C4 IFCR.V IA PuiN.55 2LOB CENTRAL C1TIE., SI CV SER 2262 CPtVRCN 2336 CCCA (CLA BOTTLING CU 2357 CLLLIFS VPMUL STRT 2394 CCU!SELING ASSOCIATES 2521 CF Ai``V OFFIC PROD 2595 C• A•Gb 1 PAIN 14L 2641 C11L, RALP.EN 2650 CA1LY REPURT 2656 P.AISV MnELL RIBBON 2710 CoR 99ISY CUEBRA C ASSOC 275J CETC1 2795 CICMSCN, R S 2818 Cl LIVE ENTERPRISES 2997 ELSIVIEA SCIE'.CE PLB 19242 6140 JERSEY INTERNATIONAL OR 11244 6.02 .11.3:6C5YA1L16LE 192..5 6604 KLEIN LINE CORPORATION I9ND 6D18 R AGUE OF CALIF CITIES RUS� JOAN .. 192+7 6127 LE 11248 6980 MC NAUCMAN PE. ROBERT 1 9249 7100 Y C M FEFR10 /RTG 9250 73�tS 19252 7516 BAILIS�NIT RT SUPPLY 12 76 E NC DO IQ IO I9G S ERV 951 45 CW 19255 7055 FEL TR I 19256 7665 DAC IF IC C COMPUTER SLD PLY PRCCUCTS 1x25! 7616 Ge INCcT INS SERV %GFC CO 1.9260 SOTS ItAM GE DATAE1N CCN 19261 1078 RECREATION SYSTEMS INC ly WARRANT RECONCOICN 10/05163 MARK JOUR DISc6UNT DATE REFERENCE ` I J NET 1500.CC- i1 J t I, IV I° I 0 11� 70.690.SC 76.07 41.50 IJ I J I� I' I` to I I� IS IJ I� IJ I I� I� IY 160 I© RE 67 CIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WARRANT RECONN❑C ATICN 10105/83 E 2 I WAAR 4 !S Y E N L 0 R N M1 N E. DATE CISCOUNT NET REFS J 'f 86" I APAUL EL 1+274 91 I F EO INS CO Sg 2C %CS %n3 i ».27 7el.Cn 19276 $700 SUILIVANCPE. ROBERT 10 /CS% 3 19117 8720 SUN TELEGRAM 10IC51°3 96.00 19278 8151 TAUNTON PRESS 10105/0 2l.CC 15279 1928(0 910 9185 VA1AIN, MI MAEL 0 WA P REN L CO CARL CI05/R3 1C/05/e3 IOO.CO 2l Gt9.9C IM v282 95 o7 NILLIii LCAN ASSOC 150755/1+-)3 ♦15.25 920 Q8`0 91 '1 ANVRtW 3I.�C I e 9 10.8 IM LE. 10%45/93 19295 91P9 HUGHES BRIAN 101"1 P,3 3.55 II VO110 CC �OTLTALS DAVIS 15.55 i 19287 INAL IC /05/F3 G 9 tfi FINAL TOTALS 148,454.E4 11 I l J I IJ Cho Y Iy I J I - 1 J 1 - 1 � J I I O '----------------------------------------------------- - - - -1Y — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA$f0 \GA ��cntrp STAFF REPORT • � A i'D DATE: October 5, 1983 _ rZ T0: City Council and City Manager (n -- FRO'1: Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 7349 Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Parcel Map 7349 located on the north side of 4th Street, east of the Route 15 Freeway. Lewis Development Co., developer, of Parcel Map 7349, has been notified by mail o` the public hearing date. T6r Engineer's Report, preliminary approved by Resolution No. 83 -152 on • September 7, 1983, is attached showing the following assessment: The landscaped area on the westerly side of Hyssop (between Hyssop and the Freeway) the temporary detention basin located on Parcel No. 8 and the storm drain easement which provides the drainage of Hyssop Street south to th- detention basin will be maintained by the Assessment District. Total annual maintenance cost is being estimated as follows: Landscaping $0.30 x 6057 sq. ft. _ $1,817.00 Detenticc basin and storm drain = $1 000.00 LUMP SUM $2:8I7.00 Per Lot Annual Assessment $ 352.14 Per Lot Monthly Assessment $ 29.35 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution orderirg the work in connection with the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Mao 7349. Respectfully snbmi�ed, LRH BV a;j as Attachments 0 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C; T '! OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City ") did on September 7, 1983, adopt Resolution No. 83 -152 giving its preliminary approval to an Engineer's Report (the "Engineer's Report ") prepared in connection with the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City did on September 7, 1933 adopt Resolution No. 83 -153 declaring its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972: and WHEREAS, a certified copy of said Resolution No. 83 -153 was duly published in the time, form and manner required by law as shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City; and • WHEREAS, a notice of put l is hearing was duly mailed to all oer•sons owning property within the proposed Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 in the time, form and manner as required by law; and WJEREAS, a public hearing has been held and this City Council has duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and this City Council has now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SLCTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its final approval to the Engineer's Report. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby orders the formation of ",mdse np :`lairit.enance District No. 3" and the maintenance of certain Ian :i, —ape improvements to he located within said Landscape Maintenance District, as mar^ particularly described in the Engineer'; Report. SECTION 3: This City Council hereby confirms the diagram of "Landscape !4 1-1-11 t nnanr,e 0istrir4, No, 3" as more particularly described in said EngincF!r's Repnrt and hereby confirms the assessments for fiscal year 1983 -84 and the method of assessment as more particularly described in the Engineer's 12 Report, \J Resolution No. 83 -112 Page 2 SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and — directed to file the diagram and assessment contained in the Engineer's Report, or a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor, ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk jaa E Jon D. Mi a s, Mayor • Resolution No. 83 -112 Page 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of ;972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the establishment of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Area to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagram. The total area of said parkways being 6,057 square feet, and a detention basin located on Parcel No. 8. Work to be provided for, with the assessments • established by the District, are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any parkway and detention basin improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot. basis. SECTION 3, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and specifications for landscaping, detention basin and storm drain are tc be prepared by the developer. The plans are as stipulated in the conditions of approval and as approved by the City Engineer and City Planning Division, Reference is hereby made to the subject Parcel Map and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape area. The plans and specifications for landscape improvements on the individual Parcels are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Pt!tailed maintenance activities include The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of airy. improvement, to include landscaping, detention basin and storm drain, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and cleaning of drainage inlet and outlet structures, pest control, debris removal, fence repair and all associated work for the successful functioning of the systems. Resolution No. 83 -112 Page 4 J SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on data from other cities, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated tha maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty cents (5.30) per square foot per year for parkway and a Lump Sum $1000 annually for detention basin maintenance. Thpsp —t, are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 comprised of 8 lots and per lot costs are shown below: Total Annual Maintenance Cost: Landscaping 0.30 x 6057 = $1817.10 Detention Basin - Lump Sum = 1000.00 and Storm Drain TOTAL —p7i7 -1-6 Per Lot Annual Assessment $2817 divided by 8 = $352.14 Per Lot Monthly Assessment = $29.35 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the • attached Assessment Diagram. SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ". SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvement for the entire district is found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. SECTION 7. ORDER OF EVENTS 1. City Council approves institution of District proceedings. 2. City Council adonts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engicer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets a public hearing date, 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with City Council. 6, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • A 01 till,•; CI "1'1' OF K; \,, \'CI IO Cl'(:. \CIO. \'G \ A ,.,x191) • '_ Page_ L 1 0 it 3 C 7L%LY 'I-,, 19?3 Qear ��r, IW QCCC. rCl0.NGC. W�tF\CCNV EM:�R� \ON, CeaYlogFR Krgll) khe Fcllow;,�sy le }- }er is i-or,,:arclecl no a Pek k oN tc vacake alley, Alley Ila) is locctkecl, be {weer" Co`a very Averouc Qw ` iwrmaI, Ave NUer m {i1P_ C-Ay I"t rs dive 0-y Nerkh of 8735 CJo -vevas AvenJUP- o-N� direr }ly roorkh o�wnz voumar Avenue. This alley is a)x direc�ty Scs }h of St85 E.vt'� stree},sBZOC- e.gth skreek anlri. 8207 E. cite Streei. Tt is also urcl r,k ^ci, kha} haviN3 ecu eN' }et io {.he vacakir;3 o-� alley Nu r }h aF 18735 vlavera gveNar -Uw. c4y is 1lere6y 1 elievecl op }he c11e i�3 re;peN,',4' \,ite >: CO C', {y is KNOW iot,cjer re paticrble fcr nr b) DYQ,N0.�11'. kC �UYYOUNr1.rNlJ p,rr:A3. C) Prevero },��y of l>„r:ker ru,� -e� Spec,�rcc. \ly where. alley rs • }o be vgcared. FtirkFerTncre } is Cle<\r aro\ uro� rCC cn lMa{ orvC,C; alley Is vc,cxi-,<1 by pryA;krow ar'A apprcverl loy the city mny r ok Yf veSe Or ctlkCr This doCU,nea;k . I} '� <� al ,o ur�rj <rc }ond ihnt l\ir:� 1�, CL OGF �c'.�nl dcw vneo;4 Qv'. rl ._ \o. bi �l`�l'•.\ 0.`, `X.,mu _t ig ctl >o �.r;r1•.r•,-Ecc.r1 �'<-r {l,t P1-cte.c {IOr0 of }.h0 r'�!y nro�t n;,,'r:�hbn,'s, Cr,�chrn��_�l, 6hoF cr„cp. }hir, dec.urnf,'E' rL �iC;`�o,i. the Cr.WtCr•�tb G�'"rl m,r�UP,•.v:) ,..,lhu„ �,1 �cJl p��E Ic YPvo r, f.rl Nor er\ Th,:, �e4 {ar �; b�'�n� fcr��r.r<1 <..l nc, c•�J c4'{- rcictl c%cY�i.-merut to kh� C,ry u� tror)�ri;in'.r'S, IhiL �s n prcp�.n.\ vih�th SeFKa Ctrpreto.l by F.he City {c vc,cal•e alley or\,d Sub- prvide property. C PAGe 2 of 3 The 6TY o� P,Ar,cho CucarmcM; C' does hevu4e a- 'Fee 3F 41127•Co �C. xr is the. propr Ul {hANSHCEION. 8(!;V"9'5 {YMe {h'�s Is 0. Five 6rcrnl,- Clc'iioru q, -Eo{a.l ojp S 25.m u;ill be rec,ulre_& Fror'rti eac4, Fnr {y or qN q- mcLv.� frorm ard� 9'ivem party {hat -61)e reou'wed bcdaNCe. x , Jarme5 A. Bceiller,�c;ll tee. the Ce\lec {or op the e fuNdS o.n:d & 6Y here prormise to p1_v ,cNt \cs full S 12S,ro {.o the CAA o-F Ramc}c C.ucnn. Oi433 . i %)Cgve renCl {F1 =_. (40ai -.C% QNci CCn1t rN {� W�ihiN. I da urVCler� {r�ror1 40-,e Nrope:�l qm& do CcN!:' ,,%,k {o havk . p.11ey uacc,�ad. As reQaec {ed try the C;4-_y of 6�gineer's the F011owi.� Nay eS are 'lN aNrL Jpu \\y ANrler- CCo;jteeats {h' ,IN: 1. 7offncS A. goE;ller yip, n�AQr 8735 Cale vera9 Ave. Cam- mesta, Calif. r z Cruz e Faro el Rojas 8732 Virjrtnar Ave., C uCC rmo aqa, C., a;, 3. C:.I'i 56 ro C arrT.e L g2o-7 c�tn <�lrr�r>l C,kc(l 'n)CwTL Cals' 4 Ra�cxel Morales 820f, g4h:�trc;c6, i r • • • C PAGE 3 of 3 F. Lorewo lwfctr; }c 6195 E. 9t! Guco�rnon,�cc, Ca1,�. F /lKZ9/<lrP Mi. LOo-C tzo i. i ;aro {e is a -�rec,ureh repre,QrAt*m9 the "Church off' N1to- reroe'.' AW6ou91N preperky is rook occupied by W. Lor-rNzo SruIVaroke Inc k-10-5 beew G,ve" aukV \Ori2ak%OW �hNJ n ih P_ Chur4h -.o vamp e alley. Pre ^e,, 11y a 4s E. 9th Street iS Ou>NUed b� kheCh+vch o� NttzareNe."i Qlkhoa�h ik is beinoo lre 4te ko QNokher parjcY. This is 4 proposal which Seeks tLpprevalby khe city iNV cyder {4mk oc-imw r Cy be taKec�l {o V4C(ike n.Hey ar,& 5i\b- divide. prcperkY. Re5pect4,u ly your gM85 A. BOT���flR z • RESOLUTION NO. 10- 05 -103CR 83 -00 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, AN EAST /WEST AL.EY LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES WHEREAS, by Resolutior 13 -1. September 7, 1983 the Council of the City of Rancho )- intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinr: : -r ticulari described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on October S, is he Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, kancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that the East West Alley located between Calaveras and Vinmar Avenues is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as • shown on Map No.V -030 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exception —' any, set forth in Exhibit "B ", which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resoTution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikes, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 1. jaa EXHIBIT "A" That portion of the alley (20, wide) as shown on Eureka Gardens Tract No. • 1829, as recorded in Map Book 28, Page 20 in Official Records of San Bernardino County, State of California, bounded by the following: On the East, by the West right -of -way line of Vinmar Avenue; on the West, by the East right -of -way line of Monte Vista Avenue (i.resently known as Calaveras Avenue); on the North; by the fc ,"erl, r 'party iin =.s of Lots 4 through 9 on the South, by the Northerly prc line. and 14; all of the said Tract Map. EXHIBIT "B" Reservation and Exceptions The vacation described in Exhibit "A" pertains to the use of said land for • alley purposes. All utility uses are retained and excepted. • Sep-ember 22, 1983 Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk Rancho Cucamonga City Council 93220 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California SUB 'EC-: STORAGE 'YARD AT 10191 BASS:_::°_ '_,7., Dear Mr. Wasserman: With the rainy season approaching and no .formal resolution planned, I find It necessary to pursue the matter more strongly to avoid further damages. Therefore, I respectfully demand that this ratter be brought before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council at their first eetlno in October, 19e3, at which time -c representative shell solicit the support of the council members to assure that the matter is duickly resolved. I also will require a written legal determination, provided by the City Attorney, regardl.ng the legal status of the storage yard with respect to current zoning, drainage, sani- tation and business codes in Rancho Cucamonga. I previously requested this information in a letter dates September 2, 1983 and have not received any of this ',formation. I would sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter and request that a written response be forthcoming. Your cooperation will be appreciated, i 7343 Turner .Avenue Rancho 7.camonga, California 91730 cc: Robert Dougherty, City Attorney Michael Vairin, Senior Planner E September 2, 1983 Mr. Michael Vairin Community Development Department Planning Dlvisiou 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California SUBJECT: STORAGE YARD AT 10191 BASELINE ROAD Jear Mr. Vairin: This letter documents the continuing problems I am experi- encing due to the improper drainage conditions caused by the storage lot operated by Ms. Leona Dana at 10191 Baseline Road, and my unsuccessful attempts to have this dralnage situation corrected. For three years I have been unable to convince Ms. Dana to correct the drainage problem voluntarily. I therefore found it necessary to contact the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in January of 1983 regarding the problem. You spoke with both Ms. Dana and myself and visited my property during a rainstorm in order to confirm the severity of the problem. At that time, Ms. Dana had assured you of her willingness to cooperate in solving the problem; however, to this date no corrections have been made. On March 25, 1983, I drafted letters to Mr. Hubbs, Mr. Wasser- man and yourself giving written documentation and accompany - in- photographs depicting the severity of the drainage prob- lem. At that time I requested that the Planning Division issue a formal citation to Ms. Dana and that the site be re- turned to its original condition. I also requested that Mr. Wasserman place the matter on the agenda for the first City Council meeting in May, 1983. In Mr. Wasserman's written response, he assured me that he would instruct you to pursue the matter until it was satis- factorily resolved and that a City Coundil meeting was not necessary at that time. As a rssult, you drafted a letter `.o : ?s. Dana inforc.in_, her of her options in correctin5 the problem: '.) have an engineer prepare and ins`,igate a drainage plan with the approval of the City, or 2) remove all storage use and return the site to its original condition. As a result of the above correspondance, Ms. Dana me }- with Mr. Gomez and yourself on June 10, 1983. In a letter to Ms. Dana dated June 13, 1983, you set three distinct deadlines for correcting the problem. These were: 1} An easement for drainage should be obtained by June 17, 1983, 2) Preparation and submittal of drainage and grading plans by July 1, 1983, and ;} Completion f construction and improvements by the end of August, 1983• Ms. Dana obtained the services of tor. R. Sullivan, P-, in order to find a satisfactory solution to the problem, Mr. Sullivan prepared a rough elevation survey and spoke with Mr. Lees (neighbor to the east) and myself on several occai- sions. In a letter dated July 27, 1983, 61r. Sullivan with- drew his services after determining that "no solution could be found which would be satisfactory to all parties involved." I have carefully reviewed the elevation survey prepared by Mr. Sullivan and It would seem impractical for drainage structures to be constructed to divert the water to Turner Avenue due to the drastic elevation changes that would be necessary to allow adequate water flow. To date, no tempozary or permanent corrections have been made and further damages were incurred during the recent storms of August 7th through August 19th, -dith no resolution to the problem in sight, I therefore re- quest that the City Attorney, in conjun =tlon with yourself, provide me with a written legal determination regarding the legal status of the storage yard with respect to current zoning, drainage, sanitation and business codes in Rancho Cucamonga. I also request that this be accomplished no later than September 15, 1983• This information Is necessary as I believe that civil action will be required in order to resolve the problem and recover my losses which range in the thousands of dollars. 1 would also recommend that the Cisy o^ Rancho Cucamonga instigate any final actions against }is. =ana immedia`.ely in order to mitigate the City's responsibility for any damages resulting from future storms. Your cooperation will be appreciated, 7343 Turner Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 cc: Lauren Wasserman Robert Dougherty Leona Dana CITY OF RANCHO C REDEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1983 TO: Members of the Redevelopment Agency and Executive Director FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Assistant Executive Director SUBJECT: JUDICIAL VALIDATION ACTION FOR FUTURE TAX ALLOCATION BOND ISSUES Prior to the issuance of any tax allocation bonds from the Redevelop- ment Agency, validating the issuance of any future tax allocation bonds by the Redevelopment Agency is a procedural necessity. The validation action is a routine process done by all redevelopment agencies to en- sure the success of any tax allocation bond sale and the validation needs to be authorized by the Agency through the adoption of a Resolution of Intent. Because of time constraints in receiving the resolution From our redevelopment counsel, said resolution will be delivered to the Agency Board on Monday, October 3. The resolution does not bind the Council in issuing any tax allocation bonds but establishes a founda- tion for any issuance of future bonds. R pec tfuI y submitted, J CK LAM, 100, Community Development Director JL:jk LM =- L; j CITY OF RANUfO UKAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California October 5, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Roil Call: Buquet , Dahl , Frost Schles ?r_, and Mikels_ B. Approval of Minutes: None submitted. 2. 004SENT CALENDAR •The following Consent Calendar item are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. No hams submitted. 3. STAFF REPORTS A. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION 110 INITIATN PROCEDURAL To br hand delivered VALIDATION ACTIONS PREPARATORY TO THE ISSUANCE OF FUTURE TAX ALLOCATION BONDS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Staff report by Jack Lam. 4. ADJOURNMENT 11 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONI REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 198_ TO: Members of the Redevelopment Agency and Executive Director FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Assistant Executive Director SUBJECT: JUDICIAL VALIDATION ACTION FOR FUTURE TAX ALLOCATION BOND ISSUES Prior to the issuance of any tax allocation bonds from the Redevelop- ment Agency, validating the issuance of any future tax allocation bonds by the Redevelopment Agency is a procedural necessity. The validation action is a routine process done by all redevelopment agencies to en- sure the success of any tax allocation bond sale and the validation needs to be authorized by the Agency through the adoption of a Resolution of Intent. Because of time constraints in receiving the resolution from our redevelopment counsel, said resolution will be delivered to the Agency Board on Monday, October 3. The resolution does not bind the Council in issuing any tax allocation bonds but establishes a founda- tion for any issuance of future bonds. Y submitted, J CK LAM, r.Al dyrt_. Community Development Director JL:jk C' H L' CITY of RANCHO CU(AMONGA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California October 5, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 P.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerks Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Buquet , Dahl _, Frost • Schlosser _, and Mikels C. Approval of Minutes: None submitted. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Thursday, October 6, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. B. Wednesday, October 12, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. C. Thursday, October 20, 7:00 p.m. - PARES ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Lions Park Community Center. D. Presentation of Service Recognition Awards. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. A. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83- 10 -059 and Payroll t dated 9 -18 -83 in the total amount of {194,822.99• B. Forward Claim against the City by William H. Smith to 3 the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. City Council Agenda Page 2 October 5, 1983 C. Forward Claim against the City by Anton J. and Mary L. 5 • Blatnick to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. D. Forward Claim against the City by Morris V. Farinella to 6 the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. E. Foward Claim against the City by Charles Mancha to the 7 City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. F. Request approval of Parcel Map 7853, bonds, and 9 agreement submitted by Ron Martin and Associates, located on the west side of Hellman, north side of Church Street. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -167 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7853, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. G. Recommend approval of Real Property Improvement Contract 19 and Lien Agreement and release of previously submitted bonds and agreement for Development Review 81 -05 submitted by Ameron, Inc. • Faithful Performance Bond $54,000 Labor 6 Material Bond $27,000 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -168 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT AND RELEASING PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BONDS AND AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 81 -05. H. Request approval of Release of Bonds for Tract 9435, 26 located north of Victoria And east of Haven Avenue, and issuance of a Notice of Completion. Owner: Crismar Development. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $117,000 • City Council Agenda Page 3 October 5, 1983 IaRESOLUTIO NO. 83 -169 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 9435 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. I. Approval to upgrade current copy equipment to more heavy 29 duty and more efficient system. Recommendation is to divest ourselves of the two IBM III copiers located in Administration and Community Development and replace them with Kodak 150s. 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ORDERING WORK IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAIWTENANCE 31 DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 7349. It is recommended that City Council approve the resolution ordering the work in connection with Parcel Map 73119, located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Route 15 freeway. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -112 32 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT. (PM 7349). B. ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EAST/WP.31' ALLEY LOCATED 37 BETWEEN CALAVRRAS AND VINMAN AVENUES. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -170 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED AN EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES. 5. NON- ADVERTIZED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted, City Council Agenda Page 4 October 5, 1983 6. CITT IMNAGER'S REPORTS A. SCHEDULING OF BUDGET ADOPTION MEETING. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. T. CUT ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT C • • A,67 CIT## RANCHO CUCAMONGA WA RA M 6 V E N C O R N 1 M f 16 10806 5276 INTL CDNf BLOC OFFICIAL 1cnN 19213 I,1 La 3'.215 14216 I42I7 19218 N219 220 I2TS rAE.l CF A= RICA 'IT C SA 1133 BEST C�F ZCDCORSCGCT] I74T P. NESS U.MF LTEi 5:'STE 1460 C G Fr.L 1'.TF R IN: 2J 10 CAL IEOAB IA BJS fUt S5 2108 C I'll R4 CITIES SIGN SEA 2252 CIEIRGN 2336 CT'CA CRLA EOTTL2 \G CO 19227 2656 CAI�Y NNEEI AIDMON 19228 2730 "A ISM UN RA L ASSOC L9229 275D CETC'I {9230 2795 CICM SCV. R S M3{ 2B is CI LI'.E LNT ER PR I SE 32 2997 ELSIVILR SCU"CE PLS 19233 4014 F&IRC�Ilr CUB 19234 4593 OE-1 ER AL UTC -10R AOV 1,235 4600 lik EPFCVE CO 11236 4775 Cu4h TT, JERRY R !9237 4779 n R Ah ClfS 19230 4c21 IAR`TE -HANKS DIRRCECT MMTG W 40 49 9 IYAif60ELRHVNTE6 INC 19241 5110 IPM 19242 6140 JiNSFY INTER`IATIJNAL CA SUPPLY IPI9G SERY TER SLPPLY TiNG CO /REC MGMT ICH STEMS INC WARRANT FECIINC ION WARP JiIUR DATE REFERENCE i 10205/63 DISCOUNT HET 15. 150.00- 1 376.90 6.00 ' V 2. 6 ? . 6455.12 12 Ic_77 I' 6.i4 090.19 26.14 59.25 0 4.CC 275.30 I5 5,146.85 .47 237.09 109.59 2 0 `sa:000 123.28 19.09 1. 350.CO 6 150.19 I J l 127.20 551.94 2, 25C. C0 21.45 59.09 22.59 5C0. C0 Ir924.EO 54.0' IA.11 333.26 IO i J V 5 2.41 1 C.52 9.52 e 61 I O 74.3 .443 3922.99 545.10 45.00 I w 5.00 310.09 1.023.19 .51 25 71 195.01 61.16 24.00 11B. 328.661 7 I I J I J 8.422.35 446.25 26Zp11.46 6 51 I4.2;13:00 150.00 2.266.11 I l J 5.240.68 p II ` 70,690.90 I 76.07 41.50 I C �Y R66T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAR))R I9 V E N 09 0 [ A N A M E ,p 192T4 BDBI S TA PP UL EL IFEO INS CO f 19215 6662 STEVES MOBIL `19211 11200 ySj UN L T ELEGRAM 0.06E0.T Iv 1e 1TS TAUNTOM PRESS 19 19 9 0 VA R((N. M CMM(L 0 1916 0 9 0 WA REN i �li CARL 1 ?28I y9B18 wiLIt CSN.ASSaC 192612 97C} UZF`ATI SYON AW 9585 99y 11 f1999JJJ „uC tlLE S, BRIAN 192!1 VUIO DF 3MAL ATLTLS DAVID is 1C WARRANT RECONC IATIEN 10/05/13 DA$ AEF DISCOUNT FINAL TOTALS MET 612.66 T 13.27 352.10 110.00 96.00 26.0^ 100. co 21069.9E 45.00 415.29 36.00 3.50 3.50 15.00 [46,454.04 n IJ li I° I I O li J J J Ioy IJ I Ilu to I° IJ I„ t' � J i I� Ii40 I I° CLAIM FOR D.vMr GE ON IN, Y IT 1a , 0 (£ it _.. — — —CITY OF µRANCHO CUCAMONGA • I. Claims For death , injury to person, or to personal property must be filed nooi I6t'Tf c;RoN 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911 .2), SEP 22 1983 AM Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 ye'1g80F1DI �¢(���1,11J 6 (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). TO: CITY OF R5,LCb_2cucamogga Smith 7558 PenDer St. 91730 714 987 -8342 64 _ Name of Cloimont Address Zip Phone Age _Ia5j!sonar Gt.. lia>,ci7.o ru nya. Ca. 91730_._ — rddres's to which Claimant wishes notices sent. WHEN did domooe or injury occur ?�e�uary -- WHERE did damage or injury occur? _75 .8 I'e�aer St Rancho Cucamonga %Ca, 91730 HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? Ioa rat prLSr01 ,hann,cJ&_i=a_A1_ta_L0ma And Rancho C1amnnga causing Qxces_s floodjaL condi- r' on Ha l=a_Ase c -hich diverted the flooding to this residence via is Railroad Track. WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include nnmes of employee, if known? r.ailyre n(. lheC_1tK9£ Rancho Cucamo»a to eliminn Le. this condition, which also oc -ured three years nr ior_ to this date. WHAT sum do you claim": Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the timo of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible, _guplucr_CnrjLCt and lino! yum__— __,___._._ 5 2,752.00 a ciut.P�L Ching. und_I'ainLinw_____- - - - - -- 5_490_00___ — Ruild__BI or L, iL�d,._L:y_ iii,. and Ro- tnLe_J;UL _yard _5 Z 274.00_ _ HlockwnlI was ,t provont.ive mYiglrAinountClaimed: $ af.00 _ NAMES and addressee of vitnn,trS, Do,tvv and Ihlapitnls: �pp 1 , d t4 '1::,.i_L';1yr_._41.4_.]_.S.t.. Oncai.iQ ct:91764 _. G (i Ia, nn Rice.59l5-A= bYSL AILa Lomy_C.t, 91701 _ TM- 21_.19.83_ -- /er WZ1 cr ;c � t CLAIM FOR D,yMHGE OR INJURY 1 • Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property must be flol rill )ieY 1Fo® 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). ,ply Or RANCHO CUC WA NGA ADMIWI T- 7WN Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year pt�yrrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). Mi TO: CITY OF i.,ncho Cuc ...,;:. A :T8191�Ill11i11121$� . 987- 1329 .. T. f: is r° 3latnic` ,14 ;.: ro•.r lte Cucamon,* C; 01730 -- 6- 7- -�-_bL Name of Claimant Address Zip Phone Age Rte _C,,; -, - is C., Nddress to which Claimant wishes notices sent. WHEN did damooe or injury occur? -,,y_ Nor scpt', :be., a WHERE did damage or injury occur? _1,C_ o ., ; i, _i. a HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? ^+ie$1Vptus I m?s f.. fro;+ tree OritJ t: _di-ss;, arid cau2in8 damage to roof and rain gutter. WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if known) MXXX%h i�Ot known WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amounl of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the cresentation of this claim, together with the basis of compOctior of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible) 9 *rr41,1 $ 125.16 Total Amount Claimed: S 1":5.16 NAMES and addresses of witnesses, Do, tors and Hospitnh: • Ray Roles, station :rttrn:!cr;t, !,1,60 Foothill Blvd. Cacamonya, CA 91770 + ..ic,t, 1,r•nrt; wn•7 ..•,,� •tad r ortOd it to me b;; to l ep::ane. DATE C QC i u�O.tu CLAIM FOR D.vMMGE OR INJURY WrL A_ ,` 1. Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property must be filed not later than IW days often the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). a E O E I d E CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.AWNGA Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 1,901111MIllUfthFrppcurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). SEP 22 M3 TO: CITY OF /O'1 IS181�In1�t1 IM ,,y� 1�141J18 `%aaa I%aoy,9a,c. �i\h�l. atI?T67D I ND Name of Claimant Address Zip Ffione rge 'lasa ,n14roc. AU.C. ��r� law,.. QA. alhoI ,sddress to which Claimant wishes notices sent. g WHEN did damage or injury occur? ) n WHERE did damage or injury occur? (i 0A74er d yt- eq/`H / 1qq �q QIranj HaN and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? -77 oval A",Y4Ij f rc,, 9J x,, l (' e /o ( 3 0 ., OF —A be) owT 1"Wv v-3-L,' r -c ok I wos r" t.+ WHAT particular action by the City, or its employee:,, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include ennames of emaloyees, if known) C�1'%y 11aS n-e- Otcj -i� To 0\4-aLv% \�nT {t`gtcfi�ua CAP rct��I, ' WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the timn of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible) vh 0"r 0r-AA 1., "it,1 Totol Amount Claimed: and addresses of witnesses, Dortnrs end Hospilals: F--1191 42 9 $ 7y9 . a9 P �� \*��83 / •L r � �� Siannh;r. n Clnirnan ask ti�� CLAIM FOR D.YM/1GE OR INJURY Cm, UFE 9 �. RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. Claims for death , injury to person, or to A0�14NI �R�710N I y pe personal property must be filed not cr er a 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). SEP Pis AN Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 yearl�t112148" 8 (Gov. Code, Sec, x11.2). TO: CITY OF (a,( )(' � y) l -`" r t(' 4 J1.(.t?.f'r1.4 ef-7rio y� one Age 91?-/ / 7-f+ /✓ Y1W A c T-/4 Lu,",a (7 A c Address to which Claimant wishes notices sent. WHEN did damage or injury occur ?' r }-p X i .✓I A'Tr' -gyp - �� WHERE did damage or injury occur? �; P(�ts �y4!L'7 /goo. ril�G >NY T,yseI ,ov &xr, HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? _� ui r1S TrAV G .UT _ :•'_F /4 —� /,C' Rtii _:^,U `^slr ?vr.o9Y 'U �S e.c-• _L !> r� �e� t •✓?J ,c Par j��iLr L,(: yC C, `�P I,J "IMP �7YF �T ii PYl f"r n'aL -!JA< FiCC E•n /aJ -� 7'r^ a:.— Is v Len' "t` l P, w >+ -`; [L� 0 % Lt f' f)1; r [, ,—r, -- � / / i r� P r UC-' 6• - WHAT particular or.Hon by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if known) WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective !M, ins ^far as it may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible) Total Amount Claimed: NAMLb and addresses of witnesses, Dortors and Hospitals: I Tk c-. Fo'rc c OF Tf4 e l AA pRGT r ,e-ucVreGY f L•.a�c� uep N1 ry IPA �j(.wkr� t sA CP OfLLAL ^,vo tler(V heAUr t.✓ ca;SrY <j, Cu jltNS i f rr- pIvp T,COw( v* fT- out 1,E tH�� f+LSO:T fOt A. p M LG i C, V, UA)f V e r SAL 4 M r-A ,s )Q f✓ou7- &/-- 170v'/+4)0 jk¢ uexr OAy S w, ,,,r Dock • n #) 3, aw r vesk ASPR +cr- o. rti arm Pi/ y AqCF OF '4 L.46 ,,u rk�19PAp ru i,47-c. Cf,orc_c+c T o obT"f/ , A) `c�`31 x O F Y'e /- C• U. aft T — U�6�00 l— C. V. Ui vi L f bdv 7i %_ GjOCDUVfrAU ; iVe _ Q�, Od /J r- A4ou,uTWn��vcG • Tire On, C� M 7/ {e ;e F hrcc°, are ANS Tr41C � /L� i N ve- e ri� +C ti b c1� p T it 4r wee ( s� T e g,0,4fe 0'/'A r_ r U o& r: o v ru a rc • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 0 DATE: October 5, 1983 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT:. Approval of Parcel Map 7853, Bonds and Agreement submitted by Ron Martin and Associates and located on the Nest side of Hellman Avenue, North side of Church Street Parcel Map 7853 was approved by Planning Commission on March 23, 1983 for the division of 8.76 acres into 3 parcels within the R -1 zone located on the Nest side of Hellman Avenue, North of Church Street. Ron Martin and Associates has submitted bonds and agreement to guarantee the construction of off -site improvements in the following amounts: • Faithful Performance Bond: $10,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 5,000.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 7853, bonds and agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to file said Map. Respectfully submitted, L'BH: r :jaa Attachments 0 TENTATWE PARCEL MAP NO. 7853 CITY CF RAI,kU CLrA, A ( y pc y W�o. SATE •W Y, IM Lqll I - Vmcly Acj- -CE bi in A 4 F W, RESOLUTION NO. 19_-�44CR­— C ? —/& 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7853, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7853), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7853, submitted by Ron Martin and Associates, Subdivider, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the West side of Hellman Avenue, North side of Church Street being a division of a portion of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Subdivision "B" Cucamonga Vineyard Tract, recorded in Book 20, Page 45 of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7853 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: • 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said Ci Ly; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 7853 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: �n D. Milos, ai ayor ATTEST: 19 Lauren M. Wasserman, City C ,iaa 0 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAM04GA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 7353 KNOW ALL MEN RT THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into - in conformance with the Proves i O's of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho ICu"MOTICA, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr. ed to as the City, by and between said City and Ronald W. Halt!,, Nausika F. Martin and E. Paul Tonkovich, Trustee referred to as the Developer, THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located on the west side of Hellrar Avenue, north of Church Street; and WHEREAS, Said City has established certain requirenerts to be at by said Developer as prerequisite to grant•ng of fins approval; and WHEREAS, the eeecutinn of this agreement and posting_ o improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be eVu ^ a' -nt to p .pr — mnletion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. Now- THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof • within 12 months from the data hereof, 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of t resol.it ion of the Council of said City approving this agreement. lnis agreement shall be in default on the day folIC - ing the first anniversary dale of said approval unless an xten. sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter p,cvid. ad. 3. The Developer may request additional time in 'w ^.I Ch to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days of ?Cr to the default date, and including a statemert of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera- tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, Cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial Changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any Law- ful moans• and thereupon to recover from said Developer and!. his SLroty the full Cost and e,pen5e incurred in so doing. 5. Construction oermits shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any wn,'x wlI him the pub 11C right -of -way, and the developer seal'. condiic t suet wn rk In in 11 Compliance with the regulations Clint nod there -n. Non- COmpli Anne may result in stoppin5 of the work by the City. and .assessment. of the penalties provided. 6. Pibli nh'.nf -vay :- .....lent work required shill be con, eructed cnnfnrnan� - with apprpy ml improvement Plans, Stindird Sprri'icatinns, and itdndArt Drawings and any spec t al dmundmrnts thereto. Constr,Ct'nn shAli include any transit inns An9 /or other inr ldent al win r deemed n,Cnssary for drainage 0 r 0 public safety. Errors or nmmiss ions discovered during constric- tion shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. flee tsod crk due to said plan modifications shall be co veered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surely covering the or ,ilal planned works. ], Work done within existing streets sh a 71 be diligent_ I pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to coup let any and all work in the event of unjustified de iay completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. B. The Developer shall be resoons ible for replacement, relocations, or remov e of any component of any irrigation wate- System in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9, The Developer shall be re,vo,isib Ie removal of all loose rock and other Petri, from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain park.!., trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee c•npletlon of the terms of this agreemer, shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement security shall not be less then the amount sno.,: L is 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COnSTRUCTION ESTIMATE ENCROACUME "T PERMIT FEE SCNEOULE For Improvement of: N__Ilmin Aver,, Date: 8/30/83 Comoured oy: Nar v` File Ne rence: -y4 A City Own. No. NOTE: Goes Mt include current fee for writing permit or pavement deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE ITEM UAY T. Y WRIT P,L.C. Curb - 12" C.F. 110 LF, 7.00 S 777 P,C.C. Curb - V C,F. P.C.C. Curb only 6` C.F. A.C. Berm (5200 mm.) 2.00 - 51,3.7 a• P,C.C. Sidevalk 660 S.F. 6" Drive APDrOACh 280 S.F. 3,00 5 2�0 8" P.C.C. Crass Gutter 3.03 773 Street Excavation 250 C.Y. $ impnried Embankment S 227 Preparation of Subgrade 2200 S.F. .10 Crushed Aggregate Base (per Jr. thNck) A.C. (aver 1300 tons) A.C. (900 to 1300 tons) A.C. ( ^oder 500 to 900 tons) A.C. (under 500 tons) 2200 S.F. .55 51,2:: Patch A,C. (trench) . 1" thick A.C. Overlay Adjust sewer manhole to grade clean out to grade Adjust Street sever eater valves to grade EA 1500.DO 11,500 Street Lights 1 Street $i9rs 75.00 S 157 Street Trees 2 EA Parkway Plane and Irrigation 1.5, 1500.70 $1,` - - ^0 Improvement ave vemenent Plans CONSTRUCTION COST S 8,243.M CONTINGENCY COSTS _ $ 1 584.00 _ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 1 9 928.0. FAIT4FUL PERFORMANCE SURETY (120%) 110.200,00 LABOR AND MATERIAL SECURITY (50 %) S -%O0lt,20 --__- ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE S 340.(10 •RESTORATIOWDD_INEATION CASH OEPnSIT S 1 _ (REF UTiOABLE) MON) "ENTATION SURETY (CASH) +PursuaAt to City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title I, Chapter 1.08, adppti ng San Bernard,ho County Code Titles, Chapters 1.5, a Cash re hr Atlnn /delineation deposit Shall be made prior to issuance of an Engineering Construction Permit. .4 1 nntee Accented: City of Rancho Cucamonga. California A Municipal Corporation By; Mayor Attest; --7 —it y-- -ei x Approved: C i'y -Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURFS al BE NOTARIZED 9 e • FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Bono Principal Amount; S1 D, 000. 00 qe and. address of surety: Len Miller Insurp OCe °rocker:, Inc. lti i�1 lrvine Blvd., Tustin, CA 9k600 (]Id) Sod -a; 25 MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Bond Principal Amoun,: S 5,000.00 Name and address of surety: Same CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Cash Principal Anount: S 1, 5C0. 7: Name and address of surety: Ronald Martin 5 Asscc. 1Z315 Country " -es R ^BE p �ae t ZE55 1' ^` ^• 0 "fRt "CITY TO Pai�iDr KlOR`TO AL[EPTAVC'C IN NITnESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly exec ed and ackna ledge with a'I formals: es required by law on the e e vnosite their s;gnatur -s. Date by II,g� Developer vn nted Date `1 —(6— 83 by �� -�` v, Developer lgnhture F. Pa.,l Tcn4c'�;�v,�"lrN.a-F�e • nntee Accented: City of Rancho Cucamonga. California A Municipal Corporation By; Mayor Attest; --7 —it y-- -ei x Approved: C i'y -Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURFS al BE NOTARIZED 9 e • EXECUTED IN TRIPLICATE BOND 41. 9314803 PREMIUH: $100.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHET EA$, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State Of California, and RONALD N. MARTIN, NAUSIKA MARTIN and E. PAUL - (hereinaftH designated as orinc pa nave entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which sAid agreement, dated , 198 , and identified as project Parcel Map 7853 is hereby referr—ed—to and made a part hereof; and, ° TONKOVICH as tmmtee of the E. PAUL TONKOVICH- PPCrrrVOVA CORPORATION AMENDED PROFIT SHARING TRUST (collecti•rely) WHEREAS, sold principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and FIRFMAN^ fl1N0 v p ¢;v COMPANY as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the ty o acc-,a Cucamonga (hereinafter called 'City'), In the penal sum of Ten thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($10,000.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of mnich sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these pretents. The condition of this obligation Is such that If the above bounded principal, his or Its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall In all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, cond:tians and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made • as therein prnvided, an his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and •n all respects according to their true intent and mcaning, and shall Indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents A ^d employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full. force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addltio^ to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, Incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and Included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement Or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci- fications accompanying the same shall In anywise affect its dial lost l Or% on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. -- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surely above named, on Rerterri r_16, 198 t , N, MARTIN, NAUSIKA MARTI4 and E. PAUL ICH as trustee at the F. PAUL T04KOVICII- rTPFY.ANF FI:4O 14SIIRA4Cr COMPANY SIOVAI`tYE2 soPIT .taarNG IcollectlYelY e/�lopCe✓�.`� — 1jiureiy�7 /— `� -` - -- RV 1 9 na-tiure —�iACt vney= in= F'ecti r�) \ - wTY'iycmr+Z /Ty'1,y!s•P PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTAR1710 I �f BCNO Nn, 111'Rn IA EXECUTED IN TBIPLICATr. I'llr'ICM: Snclvded in Performance LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND Pond • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamnrw a, State of California, and IMIALO W. MARTIN, NAC111A MARTIN A41 E. PAUL" (hereinafter designated as "principal" ) nave entered Into an agreement whereby principal agrees to Install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 198 , and identified as Pro3ept arce MaD s ere y re /erred Lo and mace a pa't hereof; and ee TONAOVSCH as trustee of the E. PAOL TnNVOVIr p "p arce SSlnyAL CORPOMTION AMENDED PPOVIT SEARING TRUS^ (ecllecti ^rlv) WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the wort, to file A good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made iI Title 15 (commencing wit` Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California, NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a Corporate surety are held firmly bound unto the City of Rant'D Cucamonga and all Contractors, SubContraCtnrs, laid re's. material men and other persons employed in the performance of the of ore;aid agreement and referred to I n the of Ores a 1d Cede of Civil Procedure in the sum of Five thousand and 00 /100 DOIldIS ($5,000.00), for materials furnished or labor thereon of an/ kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Ac: with respect to such work or labor, that said Surety will pay ti,e same In an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth. and also in case suit is brought upon this bond wi it pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurrec by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be award!. and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included In the judgment therein rendered. • it is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this ban: shall Inure to the benefit of any and all persons, comoinles ani corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencinc with Section 3092) of Part 4 of Oivison 3 of the Civil Code, so As to give a right of action to them or their assigns in a.y suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same Shalt in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or Addition, IN WITNESS 'WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on Sentemhr r_)fi___, 19R3 L1 V. 1APTi NAIISIVA NAPTTf! and e, PArll. PIP!'MA•1$ 111171 1" n.NysnvpA..y Omlr Sv Eris[ ue v'eTner% ne E PAUIG -- �f�eiy1 nvrrTr- PR0s' ".,1•11IAL CORPORATION AMfiNLT.0 IT SHAPi!it TROST (cellectivnly Rv Cy_,�. Aey - 7+•Y•[�.1'�'l. / //��' ''t,UW '^"'•c" -tilTl `N P. Nlctio151.a ie.' .___ (t(l.to;, J.A-,V hiQ✓ Tr .I li - -TS lnnatii Fri PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY i0 ALL BONDS SIGNATURES NOTA TURES MUST BE NOiARiEEO • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara K ;all, Engineering Technician ��uarp,ic !x F 2 1917 � SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and release of previously submitted bonds and agreement for Development Review 81 -05 submitted by Ameron, Inc. Ameron, Inc. has submitted the attached real property improvement contract and lien agreement to replace the bonds and agreement approved by City Council on October 7, 1981 for the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue far project, D. R. 81 -05. D.R. 81 -05 was approved by Planning Commission on March 11, 1981 for the addition of a 34,900 sq. ft. building. The approved conditions provided for the improvements of Arrow Route prior to occn,pancy and the acceptance of a lien agreement for the improvements on Etiwanda Avenue. Ameron, Inc. submitted an agreement and bonds for the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue and are now replacing this with a real property improvement contract and lien agreement. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and releasing the Bonds and Agreement accepted by Council on October 7, 1981. Respec fully submitted,; I.BH:BK a Attachments 1 CITY O PIANNING DIVISIU\ I�VI27! I IT 1: 1�I OI�EGTD R�1nElt1 SI -DS rrru:: I.00A riots MAP 0 • RESOLUTION N0. 10- 83 — n, � A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING A RF4L PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT PAD RELEASING PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BONDS AND AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 81 -05 WHEREAS, Development Review 81 -05, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ameron, Inc. was approved on June 1, 1982; and WHEREAS, Installation of improvements to Etiwanda Avenue established as prerequisite to issuance of a building permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Ameron, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California as follows; SECTION 1: Does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and direct the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. • SECTION 2: Does authorize the release of bonds and agreement accepted by City Council on June 2, 1982 for Development Review 81 -05. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk jaa CJ ---Ton o.- Mi a s, Mayor • - RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0.'BOa 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT D.R. 81 -05 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of 19 , by and between Anerpn, Inc, (ler•einafter referred to as "Developer "), and the UTV OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City'), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the • issuance of a building permit for industrial development, the City required the construction of missing off -site street improvements Including curb, gutter, asphalt paving and appurtenant work adjacent to the property to be developed: and WHEREAS, the. Developer desires to postpone construction of surh Improvements unit 11 a later date, as determined by the City: and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters iota this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said imp, n v ements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City shall have A lien UpJh the real property hereinafter described as snrur,ty fir the Devrinner's performanre, and any repayment doe City. F- -I 6A NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: • I. The Developer hereby agrees that it will install off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt paving and appurtenant work as described in Improvement Agreement D.R. 81 -05 dated August 24, 1981, in accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said Improvements shall be installed noon and along Etiwanda Avenue. 2. The installation of said improvements sihalI be completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Dev a Loper from the City to commence installation of the same. Instal lat ton of said imprpvments shall be at no enpense to the City. B. In the event the Ddvelope• shall fail yr rouse to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely • manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the OeveI op a written notice of its Intention to do So, enter upon the property hereinarter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4, To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of ary funds which may be expended by City in completing said Improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City, In trust, the following described :eal property situate.l in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: Parcel I: The Northerly 409,02 feel of Lot 1, Tract 5177, as per map recorded In Book 62, Page 90 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. • 'own f. • Parcel 2: The East 25 acres of the North 50 acres of the -§—Ouleast 1/4 of Section R. Township 1 South, Range 6 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Government Survey. Parcel 3: All that certain real property situated in the County of— $a�arnardimo, State of California and being A portion of Lot I as said lot is shown on that certain nap entitled Tract No. 5377 recorded in Book 62, Page 90 of Maps, records of said San Bernardino County. said portion being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 1, distant thereon South Do 24' 25m west 771.82 feet from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 1; thence from said point of beginning South 89e 51' 46m East, 1,325.49 feet to A point on the Easterly line of said line of said Lot 1; thence along last said Easterly line North 0° 22' 55m East 767.73 feet to s :crtheasterly corner of said Lot 1; thence along the Westerly line of said Lot 1, South 0. 24' 25m West 771.82 feet to the paint of beginning. Excepting therefrom the Northerly 409,82 feet of the above mentioned Lot 1. 5. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes described above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall fa i thf ul'y perform all of the acts and things by It to be done undid, this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, tithe-wise, it • shall remain in full force and effect and in all resoeets shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property an; the rights and otl'geiions of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. Upon completion by Developer of installation of the imprpve.nents contemplated hereby, the City agrees to reconrey to Developer, its successors and assigns, the City's entire Interest in the subject property so as to eliminate this Agreement As a lien of record. B. This Agreement shall he hinging upon and shall inure to the benefit of the hrirs, hiocntort, adrini5tralnrs, S.. r e n i i'1 rS end Issign5 of each of Ina partia5 hrretn. Ll 3 9. to the extent required to give effect of this • Agreement as a mortgage, the terry 'Developer" shall be "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee• as those terms are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and any Other statute pertuin ing to montages on real property, 10. If legal action is conmenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City Is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created her -eby, then the Gr evi i1 ing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonaole attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. • • 4 0 • E rTTV nc D a MrUn OT TO a ARn \Tr R STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enginee SUBJECT: Release of Bonds Tract No. 9435 - located North of Victoria and East of Haven Avenue OWNER: Crismar Oevelooment Corp. P. 0. Box 2131 Santa Monica; CA 90406 ACCEPT Maintenance Bond 55,850.00 RELEASE Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $111,000.00 The road improvements have been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that City Council accept the roads, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize release of the Faithful Performance Bond. r' ' RESOLUTION NO. - 3 (x3 —/6 / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 'TRACT 9435 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 9435 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorize] to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES ABSENT: • ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk jaa 9 Jon D. Mike I5, Mayor 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date: October 5, 1983 L Toy Hubbs, City ngineer 2 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCaMONGA Post Office Be, 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 vi,CE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an Interest or e>tate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: TRACT 9435 located North of Victoria and East of Haven Avenue 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Box 807, Ranc ^o Cucamonga, California 91730. • 3. On the 5th day of October, 1983, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in t`R contract documents for: Tract 9435 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Crisman Development Corp. 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Tract 9435 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date: October 5, 1983 L Toy Hubbs, City ngineer 2 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Iz 'L Date: October 5, 1987 _ To: City Council fie? From: Finance Director Subject: Copy Machine(s) Replacement Over the past two (2) years the City has been experiencing a series of serious breakdowns with the copy equipment currently being used by staff. What this has meant is periods of long waits before the equipment was operational again. In defense of the IBM repairmen, they do respond appropriately, the problem is they are here so much people think they are staff, and as often as they are here, maybe they should he. The City has been experiencing on -going problems with the Adminis- tration copier that have never been resolved, mitigated somewhat at times, but never eliminated. As a result of this on- going. situation, IBM and Kodak were contacted for help in resolving this problem. Both companies were met with and the problem outlined to them and proposals for changes, upgrade of equipment were solicited. Both companies submitted proposals for replacing the • equipment, Kodak responded once more with a follow up meeting to explain their proposal. IBM has to respond to a follow up meeting set for the week of September 19th, 1983. The analysis performed indicates, from a labor analysis, soft and hard dollar cost that a savings does occur on an annual basis when using Kodak equipment of $1,383,36. Also, with the Kodak 150, 881.77 man hours are effectively saved, or more efficiently used in the process. (See the attached analysis sheet). The problem is not One of Just sending the IBM's back and bringing in the Kodak 150's, but one Of selling or unloading, if you will, the one IBM copier we. own, or are still paying for. Having advertised, and searrhed for a lover, it turns out that there is no market for a used, unrec..nditi<aed copy machine. The City still owes $11,272.00. IBM, doesn't want it, Kodak doesn't want it, the brokerage firms won't touch it. Kodak, therefore, said it would buy it for 51,006, which isn't bnd considering it isn't worth i nickel: and they will also for -go the Ist month lease pnymr•nt tin bath now rapiers. This amounts to total of $4,000, mitigating somewhat th^ total payoff factor to $7,272,00. Recommendat tun: P,iy off the balance duo on the IBM cope machine by apprupriatian in the 81 -84 Budget. Award n contract to the Kodak Companv for the leire /runt of two (2) Kodak 150 with finishers, and then adjust the Budl;vt accordingly. An .ilLornitivo is to continue paving off the IBM copier nt inty we are rurrently doing so, however, n considerahle .ntumnt of intorest can be saved by paving if otf all at once. Anyway the decision goes, the City will still hnvo to pav fur tbo IBM Ill copier. L A B O R A N A L Y S I S 07/27/83 CURRENT CONFIGURATION TOTAL 72000 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: SAVINGS _= TOTAL ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: 25.33 8.17 33.50 ( 8.17) 2149.57 -0.40 14.41 1441 633.90 WIME INCLUDES UASTE.FATIGUE AND ANY FINISHING OPERATIONS • 11 MACHINE OPERATOR TOTAL MONTHLY JOB TIME TIME TIME JOB MODEL VOLUME OPJ CPO TYPE (HR /MO) (HR /MO) (HR /MO) I IBM 3 60 U /ADF 8000 SOX 100 SP 2.23 0.38 2.61 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 0.38) 3 IBM 3 60 U /ADF 40000 5OX 20 SO 11.42 1.96 13.38 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 1.96) 5 IBM 3 60 U /ADF 8000 1X 2 SS 6.46 10.55 17.01 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 10.55) 7 IBM 3 60 WADE 8000 3X 300 SS 2.67 5.51 8.18 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 5.51) 9 IBM 3 60 U /ADF 8000 4X 100 SS 2.15 4.18 6.33 ABSOLUTE OPERATDR HOURS ( 4.18) TOTAL --------- 72000 ------- 24.93 ------- 22.58 ------ 47.50 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 22.58) EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: 1515.67 PROPOSED CONFIGURATION _-----------'-- ----'-- MACHINE OPERATOR TOTAL MONTHLY JOB TIME TIME TIME JOB MODEL VOLUME OPJ CPO TYPE (HR /MO) (HR /MO) (HR /MO) 2 EK 150AF COPIER 8000 50X 100 SIl 1.91 0.09 2.00 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 0.09) 4 EK 150AF COPIER 40000 5OX 20 SD 9.70 1.62 11.32 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 1.62) 6 EK ISOAF COPIER 8000 IX 2 SS 9.85 6.28 16.13 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS f 6.28) 8 EK 150AF COPIER 8000 3X 300 SS 1.93 0.08 2.01 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 0.08) 10 EK. 150AF COPIER 8000 0 100 SS 1.95 0.10 2.04 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 0.10) TOTAL 72000 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: SAVINGS _= TOTAL ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: 25.33 8.17 33.50 ( 8.17) 2149.57 -0.40 14.41 1441 633.90 WIME INCLUDES UASTE.FATIGUE AND ANY FINISHING OPERATIONS • 11 0 • I 1 111 nc n n 11wn nrn n e11111 a STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1983 TO: City Council and. City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, Ci•.y Engl• =er BY: Barbara Krall, Eng•- Tec SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK I), JITH LAND APE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 73,, Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Parcel Map 7349 located on the north side of 4th Street, east of the Route 15 Freeway. Lewis Development Co., developer, of Parcel Map 7349, has been notified by mail of the public hearing date. The Engineer's Report, preliminary approved by Resolution No. 83 -152 on September 7, 1983, is attached showing the following assessment: The landscaped area on the westerly side of Hyssop (between Hyssop and the Freeway) the temporary detention basin located on Parcel No. 8 and the storm drain easement which provides the drainage of Hyssop Street south to the detention basin will be maintained by the Assessment District. Total annual maintenance cost is being estimated as follows: Landscaping $0.30 x 6057 sq. ft. _ $1,817.00 Detention basin and storm drain = $1 000.00 LUMP SUM 32 mm Per Lot Annual Assessment $ 352.14 Per Lot Monthly Assessment $ 29.35 REC"ENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Map 7349. Respectfully submit�ed, LBH BK:jaa Attachments • RESOLUTION NO. 83 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City ") did on September 7, 1983, adopt Resolution No. 83 -152 giving its preliminary approval to an Engineer's Report (the "Engineer's Report ") Prepared in connection with the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District. No, 3" pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City did on September 1, 1993 adopt Resolution No. 83 -153 declaring its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, a certified copy of said Resolution No. 83 -153 was duly published in the time, form and manner required by law as shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City; and • WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was duly mailed to all persons owning property within the proposed Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 in the time, form and manner as required by law; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held and this City Council has duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and this City Council has now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its final approval to the Engineer's Report. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby orders the formation of "Landscape Ila intenance District No. 3" and the maintenance of certain landscape improvements to be located within said Landscape Maintenance District, as more particularly described in the Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council hereby confirms the diagram of "Lanclscapc+ t4aint—onance District No. 3" as more particularly described in said Engineer's Report and hereby confirms the assessments for fiscal year 1983 -36 and the method of assessment as more particularly described in the Engineer's Report. Resolution No. 83 -112 Page 2 SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorize a�3�trected to file the diagram and assessment contained in the Engineer's Report, or a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor. r ASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, city Clerk jaa 17J • • Resolution No. 83 -112 Page 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirenents of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, S ^ate of California (Land,caping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPT101 The report deals with the establishment of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Area to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagram. The total area of said parkways being 6,057 square feet, and a detention basin located on Parcel No. 8. Work to be provided for, with the assessments • established by the District, are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any parkway and detention basin improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and specifications for landscaping, detention basin and storm drain are to be prepared by the developer. The plans are as stipulated in the renditions of approval and as approved by the City Engineer and City Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject Parcel Map and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape area. The plans and specifications for landscape improvements on the individual Parcels are hereby made a part of this report Lo the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities include The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, to include landscaping, detention basin and storm drain, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and cleaning of drainage inlet and outlet structures, pest control, debris removal, fence repair and all associated work for the successful functioning of the systems. Resolution No. 83 -112 Page 4 • SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on data from other cities, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated tha maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty cents ($.30) per square foot per year for parkway and a Lump Sum $1000 annually for detention basin maintenance. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 comprised of 8 lots and per lot costs are shown below: Total Annual Maintenance Cost: Landscaping 0.30 x 6057 = $1817.10 Detention Basin - Lump Sum = 1000.00 and Storm Drain TOTAL �28T7. Id Per Lot Annual Assessment $2817 divided by 8 $352.14 Per Lot Monthly Assessment = $29.35 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. • SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ". SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvement for the entire district is found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. SECTION 7. ORDER OF EVENTS 1. City Council approves institution of District proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engieer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets a public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • 0 a GXGINFERIXG DIVISION > VICIVITI' NIAP • J it ,TV nC l A MOT.rn !`T *rl n 1Tnvc n On November 25, 1981, Planning Commission reviewed the request to vacate the above- described allp,, -tong with the portion of the alley located on the west side of Calaveras F Planning Commission recommended that the alley he vacated through City C:..ncil procedure. The portion located on the west side of Calaveras has been vacated by City Council Resolution No. 83 -24 approved on February 3, 1982. Attached is a letter received from the property owners adjacent to the alley on the east side of Calaveras requesting a vacation of said alley. The alley is unpaved and is not used for entrance to any of the lots, There is a chain link fence along the rear of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 1 with Lots 4 and 5 being vacant. Lots 8 and 9 have been merged into one lot and contain a house with a block wall to rear and side. Lot 33 fronting on Vinmar contains an existing house; Lot 33 fronting on Vinmar contains an existing house. These two lots are fenced at this time. Drainage does not appear to be a problem. The land slopes slightly to the south. Since the alley is unpaved, it has not been used to carry drainage flows to the street. The owners are aware that they would become responsible for the lot to lot drainage upon vacation of the alley. The property owners have been notified of the public hearing date. The site has also been posted and the public hearing advertised. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of the above described alley and directing the City Clerk to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded. Respectfully submipted, L K': KI jaa V STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1983 Iz T0: City Council and City Manager ' — -ia �7 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ORDER TO VACATE AN EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES On November 25, 1981, Planning Commission reviewed the request to vacate the above- described allp,, -tong with the portion of the alley located on the west side of Calaveras F Planning Commission recommended that the alley he vacated through City C:..ncil procedure. The portion located on the west side of Calaveras has been vacated by City Council Resolution No. 83 -24 approved on February 3, 1982. Attached is a letter received from the property owners adjacent to the alley on the east side of Calaveras requesting a vacation of said alley. The alley is unpaved and is not used for entrance to any of the lots, There is a chain link fence along the rear of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 1 with Lots 4 and 5 being vacant. Lots 8 and 9 have been merged into one lot and contain a house with a block wall to rear and side. Lot 33 fronting on Vinmar contains an existing house; Lot 33 fronting on Vinmar contains an existing house. These two lots are fenced at this time. Drainage does not appear to be a problem. The land slopes slightly to the south. Since the alley is unpaved, it has not been used to carry drainage flows to the street. The owners are aware that they would become responsible for the lot to lot drainage upon vacation of the alley. The property owners have been notified of the public hearing date. The site has also been posted and the public hearing advertised. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of the above described alley and directing the City Clerk to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded. Respectfully submipted, L K': KI jaa V V -030 �HURCH u„ �� l w ril Ll L fob �; (a �� 2 �° C� rJ a z , • I c IF NAZARENE ¢O GOMEZ; a' rc S 2 I] 6 I S I 6 T B 9 q II r? 'I QIz 40 41 .. 2 0) 4 — C) 43 30 44 0 45 46 TO BE VACATED in "ro title; CITY 01: RANCHO CUCANIO. \GA w ENGINFERING I)IV'ISiON �;�-- - -;;- vlclNrry nln nn VICINITY N naFe HQTILLIER 33 ROJA3 r., N C241r — .. — -- �4 - -._ ... 21 m (D 2824 35 ri rc ,� 0 Q9 3B �il ... M. i, qo > 31 38 ti sip a 25 CC� 32 39 tn. QIz 40 41 .. 2 0) 4 — C) 43 30 44 0 45 46 TO BE VACATED in "ro title; CITY 01: RANCHO CUCANIO. \GA w ENGINFERING I)IV'ISiON �;�-- - -;;- vlclNrry nln nn VICINITY N naFe p C PAC r. 1 OF 3 fli LY 17, 19.E Qcgctr �j;r, IN C.Ccordo•NC(-- W th ccNvcrsatioro, C6aY6nrn KrAii) the followi, IeLFer is pet; k ou to vacake alley. Alley iN r oecficN is iocakec- bckweev �a1..vevgg Averouc 4NA ViNrmctr AveNUC, iN {he ciiy o-rCoco. "cN9a,. It is c6veckly n)04h o4� EB735 Calaveras Avetiue, ajA dire }ly rjo' }h Vovmx Avenue. This alley is O.k;6 direckly scukh eF Z%'FS E.rit5 -tree{ E2oc. F. cyth Skreek a2d 82 (-7 E. TLt Stveeb. it is al,o lI�:SIFr� >iOC�, khak haviN3 CO�U,eNtCd i.o khe VQCakcr,3 Or alley nlnrkh Of '8739 ZaICWfY�S AveNufl lhe. c; y is hereby hehzved of the �c \1cu:iN3 reaporo5,a,\ teo; CAy 15 KNQW IOr6C�l'r re LPoNq�>It' {Gr c A,N b) DY11N �Q r1P '�.0 �,LLY YO Ufd fi.f ��f, C1.Y P.p�, C1 PrPVE!Nkln +y OP 4J/lkeY rU�L` -0L {' C.ii pec� r \1y whe.rr. Riley s to be vgc�red, F.crkher/,nere ii is clear arod uNr\fr� m�D •lhak CIJCS. Riley t, vacoke<l t,y pet;k,Q,A aNA approver\ 6,1 the Cky/ the pek��io G may root rerve3e or a1�er kh+r, do u, en t . St io a1-,o c N lerc }oo 1 4-hvt F4ii:s tC 0. off�c..rc�l cierume „k gn;fl i5 �c b�• Usrfl c;, `.- ..,,,., . -L-t �5 al�,� ur:•Aer•, }r•,,..<l f<,r she prctr'.c},rer., of !h” C'�l.y nrc•1 r „n��Flbor'., Ccrx,c>rw•`l 010A O „dam.. Ibis, �('l'U TfI:`i•i{ l$> �1%{U l`rl cl'l l.. C,�1v �'Lr.1'lh QI`i,rl .Tll. \i \�,va� w r6h,f„ L1 u..\t vYt 4•'.' V-e. ;al Nnr C_haw,ar` Ir„ nrJy lK „y. TVui laFtc>r r; Lori^; t) foY,., r,r<li,l QD cud C�{K1cLl do a.'merot to Fhe Cary o� C'N�u c -.r'S, Ihs i5 ciprcpr.al which Stev, C.pproccil by lhe. cri.y to vacal,e alley pn +d `- pub- prvlc�E property. P� \ce 2 c>f CThe ci y of P,aNCho does 1er�ureafee oF11l25.cot ar khe. gropc".eA {Yr+NSHG {toN. BNtN��s .thaf ti's Is 0. Five -party fmro5- ackiotu q, tctcl o� 525.00 W 11 be vec;�F-ri. frorm C-C pcxrty or an; q^rr,c1 \r„t fYOrm "N'i 9'Ve4N perky 40)CA w.11 r.-r,eet the 1- eQ"'wed ',cAcwace.. 2 Sevmeo A. Bck't11Er•,c',11 �le k\ie Go1\0ctor cf {hecKe. fU(04- osJci & ay here prormise to p\-e Ewt iN x„11 9125.co {o -Ole, CA'j o-� 1"jan+ci�o Cucrtcr.+e,s�a. hQvc rt'rg1 thd5 G\CGd rTy+2c„t QN(i G: Nk t`fdi".> W�i\S RJ. z do uNAer't4ro 1 t ,a_ Yr,pevnl q d Ac CCNC":tit to have. O•Iley UnCC� c� As re.y�"e:tect Icy' khe c;t.� of ENC�in;eF.r's, the fo11ow1Nrj rowmes are trJ 0.�YV.0 rrnQ �% ti� fu \ly UNifY- C:�t ACLd_ {I1� CCva tflca�S W� {hlf.: 1. SQrrrlf� A• Bot,11Er n Aal 973'5 &kkrt cera0 Ave., • CUco' )c ncL. Calif, 2 Cruz t OaN�el Rojas 9732 VtNrmar Ave., CUcor cr�3a Cal, . 3. C41't��Fro Ga**.ez_ P2o7 � +ti S6r,>t>k, 4 RcSud Morale j Fi2Oru �Itti �EYC:� i, G uC4a nc rer�a, Ca \t�-. V E n C PAGE 3 CA 3 5. LoreNZO IfQF(X +e 8185 E. cl*b Street er• - /c, Gucormowl"Col; , /r✓ A MV-. LoreNZO xti$aN {e s a krec. ;u.er repre ;enk n� {he "Church o� Nazarene A4 aA yh Froperky i5 root ocCUpieo by NV.LOrerozo MOTOVke,hehas been Oero COMMOTION iro . &he (AlUrA ko vacn�e alley. are e,vFly 8i45 E. qkb sEreek is owNed b� khe Cl,�rc'n o� NazareNe.� Qik:�ou�F, ik is beirog ' ;evked -o aroo {her Perky. This is a propefcaL which see K_. approval by 6h e, ciky 1� artier thnk CLck101U �Uy be tnKeN to vnca {e alley ar:tir 5«b divide prcperky. Reopeci:`� \y yo1ur �C.YMY _` -Xiv 1 HME.� A. Boi,L�eR 0 RESOLUTION N0. 10- 05 -03CR "' (� 3— / %C% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, AN EAST /WEST AL,EY LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES WHEREAS, by Resolutior 113 -1. ' September 7, 1983 the Council of the City of Rancho r intention to vacate a portion of a City street herein--, '•e- ticular described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on October b, i, he Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Lin Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting �o the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that the East /West Alley located between Calaveras and Vinmar Avenue; is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as . shown on Map No.V -030 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, T any, set forth in Exhibit "B ", which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recodedin the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this reso utiT� ion, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jnn 0. Mik els,Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk jaa EXHIBIT "A" That portion of the alley (20' wide) as shown on Eureka Gardens Tract No. • 1629, as recorded in Map Book 28, Page 20 in Official Records of San Bernardino County, State of California, bounded by the following: On the East, by the West nigh} -of -way line of Vinmar Avenue; on the 'West, by the East right -of -way line of Monte Vista Avenue (i,resently known as Calaveras Avenue); on the North; by the Sc 'per I, r ­t,, tin =s of Lots 4 through 9 on the South, by the Northerly prc tine, Ind 14; all of the said Tract Map. EXHIBIT "B" Reservation and Exertions The vacation described in Exhiait "A" pertains to the use of said land for • alley purposes. All utility uses are retained and excepted. 40 N� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. Ch.ele. J. RRAaet It Jame. C. Fmt - - -5 Rkhard M. Dahl Phillip 0.!561 ..ee CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON .' 1 �i J e " C°c, -t 1 •c'%. PHONE EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and a Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? SC so, please,li Why are you interested in this position?-,,' ii _ c � "_:L:T� � mob:. c- ,T.'ivT.✓ a.i :�� _ _:- T.il,. � icvi/ What do you consider to to your major REFERFl1CF.S. 1. 2. 3. Please attach a written, statement containing any additional information you feel would he useful to the City Council, PC -(I) 1320 BASELINE ROAO, SUITE C • FORT OFFICE BOX 807 . RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 11730 . (711)18111811 ' .��:r:a. �,t:�.fr':ri:7 .rf.('i�`. V••yt►nLA17Yi}L h t .j: +I4E vj Illh IS TOMMY MY Iity ..: � I •�� u•. ,1:• ;A(1tw1i1 trr �I +f LI 471 Manat;emE�nt Residential i of Property J '146 w ()V THE t0 ALTORS' all, I I IIS IS TO CERTIf Y T I I AT 4-IfAR1.1 S I. CLOVER W1 %14111 iAi Managing Real Estate as an Investment w ..3'.:s "::. :t.•. :..i a: r: E.... Vii` -"M7W. . �kk•��a'r.l:.r .r�Yr'LI•+AriL r r3.r.it � r�r � lJ.r6i � al- • R • ;t f7"j ('t • .1 }� Jt�,i) JjJ li { y "t t �j 14 Y OF THF_ NATlCY, d A L ASSOCIATION OF PEALTOf4t,* THIS IS TOCIRHFI TIM The L017 1 -ran;e Man (5r%ment Plan for Residential Prf)rerties J�. f V C-L. TIED y QTY MAN &GEI t „� .t t• h • ` • I u` ,; .N r tt',e i \jil;l'iE vi I:E:�.E iii %�iE.'•1.a:�C." Lithe NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS: is hurc'fy confer.cd u;xxT ��[tctrles `j _ Wover t�ith this t:ER iilt:;lE c:! oU.:L;iIC.\TION as to Intc•,rrrity and tLc Al,iiity to `•t.:,..i;e Intl .,e 1 ( ;;orty; .trd is cn- tidvd to all humxs. rights and pritviieges of a UM, MOS TIM Is crrnferred try %ittue cl ol �• .� t!:e su:! Ut y to tctl in the Gncrr•.:r.g [4un0! i',:i t)n the !�brn ^'.em': •., e•, nl ` the :'.t+ ,,_etlhip Cc"m:ttec ut i it I %1 ; hf t•,li`.l55 1',l!I t'lOr: it.e 1n,i�:ute -a .. icy !tr1 <a� ^•t•'� '}'C C I .;. r� r.� }:C .-d ...ywy�fcclC,.. rod. �.�,'1 .•.d t•.a ,N fu: /, .:0 Cral t '"7!C{.[.t •`„' ^'•f. ! >1!,-0 }. �c �r.;q .'i, tcd Ctl thtt e4v ,.... fett:�.xe: r111 '�j[ l�'IIMI..r M1/7J.. 1... rnM 1.r.N4....n W.n •. n.•+M�M1trI.11 �I�_�M� .�� + r LnVEH CHARLES J 10121117 .•.�� _ 147965 GLOVER CHARLES J SO /Z1 /!t 25250 N E 502 Pi AC 4; OI A 16: 0 147965 �....[ • —� 82535) R E 503 LEG ASP 4 j3 C 3 i cv_�r.ES .Tre - NOEV •• EARN C. if HT SAC F rl S S= I _� - -; 4: 12/06/79 279 �2 ;00 4 :0 4 :3 d ;) 2106/74 2l4 ; Y: 00: 4� Oi Yi 01 166 0 bT.En NNE *s .•sc uiun� ACCUM TOTAL 4 00l, 4: 0, 4; Oj 16:0 CHAFFEY TOTAL I3 j00 d ;0 8 i0 24 O ACCUM TOTAL 3'00 8 :0 d !0 I 24 >l c,�. cN EC LE[♦ —_ —_ -- �TTT,77o LOVER CHARL.5 J 10721//7 GLOVER lA7965 CHARLES J 10/21/17 — 147965 i -- SZS652 R E 506 APPRA51. 4i1 is l2 0 827550 R E 521 RE EXCM 4 0IA 116:0 NAFFEY TOTAL 3 i00I 12 i0 12:0 36 7 CCU" TCTAL 3 iC0 IZ C I2 i0 36 17 LOVER CHARLES J 1C/21/17 147965 i 25850 R 5 508 ECCN 1 4:018 12:0 CHAFFEY TOTAL 13 16 10I 16 110 I 52 i0 ACCUM TOTAL 3125 1610 16 0 52:0 GLOVER CHARLES J f0 /21/1.7 147965 827250 R E 513 ESCRO 1 A 1,0 j18 112 n I C•LIGORNi. STATE COLIe G. DEN ER.L EOVCA ". CERTIFICATION Q (,qurC[sC EJ y. C Su a i �SOCr.t fCICYD('. CD Esac. -.n LJ •" .I.uA o.TE TRANSCw_: n. I .mo I27n"Oi 280 3;00 410 410 1t ja 03,126781 380 3100 4;0 4 i 12;01 "�� " " °` " " " °`" =� s'r- 2010 64 `0 YE - I I CHAFFEY COLLEGE'° - ACCUM TOTAL 3 i20 20 It 0 ALTA LOMA, CALIFORNIA 't 6410 OOwE33 - -- — - -- — --- ---' -- cc�r ' • � +•'= .+IVN sc NOOL RECO E.w..EV AT cwESi. coE4EC( ?ae r [e1 4. attnEa.T • r•ssm - [ "'r. Mseaa�sn rawTn o eE. tw.on .. a..+ _� i s — �' - - u - _ • - r.l[uls -__ --' - -_.__. man EMa1• _ - y ... Cure •- ti nn[ LnVEH CHARLES J 10121117 .•.�� _ 147965 GLOVER CHARLES J SO /Z1 /!t 25250 N E 502 Pi AC 4; OI A 16: 0 147965 �....[ • —� 82535) R E 503 LEG ASP 4 j3 C 3 i cv_�r.ES .Tre - NOEV •• EARN C. if HT SAC F rl S S= I _� - -; 4: 12/06/79 279 �2 ;00 4 :0 4 :3 d ;) 2106/74 2l4 ; Y: 00: 4� Oi Yi 01 166 0 bT.En NNE *s .•sc uiun� ACCUM TOTAL 4 00l, 4: 0, 4; Oj 16:0 CHAFFEY TOTAL I3 j00 d ;0 8 i0 24 O ACCUM TOTAL 3'00 8 :0 d !0 I 24 >l c,�. cN EC LE[♦ —_ —_ -- �TTT,77o LOVER CHARL.5 J 10721//7 GLOVER lA7965 CHARLES J 10/21/17 — 147965 i -- SZS652 R E 506 APPRA51. 4i1 is l2 0 827550 R E 521 RE EXCM 4 0IA 116:0 NAFFEY TOTAL 3 i00I 12 i0 12:0 36 7 CCU" TCTAL 3 iC0 IZ C I2 i0 36 17 LOVER CHARLES J 1C/21/17 147965 i 25850 R 5 508 ECCN 1 4:018 12:0 CHAFFEY TOTAL 13 16 10I 16 110 I 52 i0 ACCUM TOTAL 3125 1610 16 0 52:0 GLOVER CHARLES J f0 /21/1.7 147965 827250 R E 513 ESCRO 1 A 1,0 j18 112 n I C•LIGORNi. STATE COLIe G. DEN ER.L EOVCA ". CERTIFICATION Q (,qurC[sC EJ y. C Su a i �SOCr.t fCICYD('. CD Esac. -.n LJ •" .I.uA o.TE TRANSCw_: n. I .mo I27n"Oi 280 3;00 410 410 1t ja 03,126781 380 3100 4;0 4 i 12;01 CHAFFEY TOTAL 13!201 20 0 2010 64 `0 CM AFFEY TOTA L4 3 did 2A ,0 24 �0 75 i'7 I - ACCUM TOTAL 3 i20 20 It 0 2010 6410 - ACCUM TCTAL 3116 240 X4'0 76 •0- ---' -- cc�r ?ae r [e1 4. attnEa.T • r•ssm - [ "'r. Mseaa�sn rawTn o eE. tw.on .. a..+ _� i s — �' - - u - _ • - r.l[uls -e :^ man EMa1• _ - y ... � ; .�.:: ti nn[ 1r• ._ t Y I WALNVr, CALIPORPttA EXTENDED DAY PROGRAM ^ : Certificate of (llumpletion ' This is to Certify that Cherlee has satisfactorily completed a course in Applied Ftrd ag11cs Y 14 By the authority vesrd in the Board of Trustees by the State Department t !. of Education, is entitled to all of the recognition and honors appet.aining thereto. 4L ��. Gh en as the College on EArat Sene a 1955 -1956 a� �ss ' L of �Oieb ment V-1trtificate MOUNT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE POMONA, CAUPORNIA „ •; �; Usk A�rll 3e 1957 al This Certifies that _ Charles J. Glasser ' Has completed satisfactorily a course to .BA.draPllps_ R Water i. ._?eSributipn___ _—at Mt, San Antonio College, ' Y Di.wer Bvelr/t/ Dq h' e . MOUNT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE i POMONA. CALIFORNIA i ED DakAPril- .211357 ,_ L CCr11feJ Ibat _Charles S.1itovar onit.,rted JatitfQCtorll�� a course in Nldraullee Deei� Advanced at Mt. San Antonio College. 4 J �• Clerkifite of ;Ar4ir£lvincrtt , MOUNT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE 'y POMONA. CALIFORNIA Iirtn Marc!: 15, 3.957 . �ThiJ CertifIeJ that ._CharjQS—UUer -.._ _.. .._. _.- Has Completed satisfactorily a course in Advanced xydraulics at Aft. San Antoine Colle {e. Jp}ly dd Y. ' Y. . k 2q. i , F�. . .i psi • ... e.....�...a..�....,... o ows o < i y i DEPARTME MRSONNEL SERVICE SCHOOLS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA M, certifies that 4'..J4�;, GSSrles S4 44 IIT1 IISti11 hea u,Gsfac ±ori(fv toes leterl the prescribed course of study at the � oval �oo�r o�, s'ru� {•nt one' � i _Annual C. B. Reserve Trainir:- __ -___' this - 1Pth .._ day of _ ADril 19_'5'_ .' ESL• 3! e1F_ lr! U.' 9(.'.^., iO _1!ht°±rhr~%�A?��`�f— ^'n --"'�" � <R��^!) , F�. . .i psi • ... e.....�...a..�....,... o ows o < i y i An ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga amending .°A.D G. Dle.crD.. — +NEST SAN BERNARDINO CO. BOARD OF REARS" 13 217 E. IA" Street of real estate brokers for the purposes of business Upland, California 91786 LUOILI. rRmcr;ER REALTOR' Telephone 7141946-2617 of REALTORS'1, 1.11 SCIRANRA @EOgIT We sincerely appreciate your cooperation to working September 16, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO C ( v.. Dr.rGtn. The committee presented their findings to the Board of ADMINISTRATION O MARY H. ELIINGWDDO 1.....D'Y YolnI. -AC MA1I11EY SEP 2; 03 JAMES KNUDSEN manner with which you are proceeding to clarify and solve M.A. R. DIS.Cror. our mutual problem; however, preferred to take a neutral DAVID DG[ 1E1 't18191�Ini�Ill2l918 RO;„ ° °.�,'.,o! The Honorable Jon Mikels, Mayor cRnCIf „r and City Council Members GLORIA MC°. ", 6 ,,.CR.I..• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,ON, f,"I.MS SAM Afl °NA P. O. Box B07 President r)AVID [)OC' H ITLF.R Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MARY H EL4JN.:W°°D KAREN HALLMArrn 1. C111 E FNI16NE1 MELEN PAI.MIf R, Dear Mayor Mikels and Councilmen; V1 TARN Rg1Mi, C. 1II AR I1'�'.i An ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga amending .°A.D G. Dle.crD.. — Subsection AS of Section 5.04.290 of the Rancho Cucamonga Rn.L-RMA AUDREY ADAM', Municipal Code to clarify the meaning of gross receipts WILL fIAIGTT of real estate brokers for the purposes of business license taxes has been reviewed by the Local Governmental LUOILI. rRmcr;ER Relations Committee of the West San Bernardino Co. Board GEORGE _:1R9 °,. CAROLYN GRANT of REALTORS'1, 1.11 SCIRANRA MARQ.AgfT THOMiCN We sincerely appreciate your cooperation to working MAR. All 11 I,.1AAS out an equitable solution to the problem. RI" ” 111111 - }°" The committee presented their findings to the Board of J ° "N 11AI Directors at their September meeting. The Directors have YolnI. -AC MA1I11EY asked me to express their "thanks" to you for the fine manner with which you are proceeding to clarify and solve M.A. R. DIS.Cror. our mutual problem; however, preferred to take a neutral DAVID DG[ 1E1 position at this time. G. A. R..,RED...8 cRnCIf Yours truly, 1 1F.NSEN A ni. Tl —NT ,ON, f,"I.MS Mary H. Ellingwood, �` \l TG "v "EI.T °I0I President r)AVID [)OC' H ITLF.R MARY H EL4JN.:W°°D 1. C111 E FNI16NE1 RAVE\ Hn.1 E/p V1 TARN Rg1Mi, C. 1II AR I1'�'.i 4CgfRT Yni iY'.. R" H4rtn M�.9R1 Df. .11 "'RY,1 Fle f`nrrANOFR •ol,r .i1IIIYII. ern{ m,�r4 yA.IrF:.f.nlllafn Pr- lRr,onnl n •F.Tl v H frM1i<!yry memy.r of l,bM17L AO n 1H +'CH,I ".5C' ^ilpri OF efAUCPS Of 9ALT My cX RAN(-K) CICAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENDA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California October 5. 1983 - 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Rol: call: Buquet%', Dahl Frost se Schlosr C, and Mikels. B. Approval of Minutes: None submitted. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR AGENCY isThe following Consent Calendar item are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. 10 No io;:ms submitted. 3. STAFF REPORTS A. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO INITIATE PROCEDURAL To be hard dr:ivere'. VALIDATION ACTIONS PREPARATORY TO THE ISSUANCE OF FUTURE TAX ALLOCATION BONDS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Staff report by Jack Lam. 4. ADJOURNMENT fir° Acs.' QTY OF • RANCIAO CUCAh10NGA CITY CO INUL Z AGENDA U > 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California October 5, 1983 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda cost be in writing. The deadline for submitting these item is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such item. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Buquet _, Dahl , Frost • Schlosser _, and Mikels _ C. Approval of Minutes: None submitted. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Thursday, October 6, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. B. Wednesday, October 12, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. C. Thursday, October 20. 7:00 p.m. - PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Lions Park Community Center. D. Presentation of Service Recognition Awards. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. A. Approval of Warrants, Register !Is. 83-10 -OS, and Payroll 7 dated 9 -18 -83 in the total amount of $194,822.99. B. Forward Claim against the City by William H. Smith to 3 the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. City Council Agenda Page 2 October 5, 1983 C. Forward Claim against the City by Anton J. and Mary L. 5 • Blatnick to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. D. Forward Claim against the City by Morris V. Farinella to 6 the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. E. Foward Claim against the City by Charles Mancha to the 7 City Attorney and Insurance Carrie, for handling. F. Request approval of Pzrcel Map 7853, bonds, and 9 agreement submitted by Ron Martin and Associates, located on the west side of Hellman, north side of Church Street. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -167 Z7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7853, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. G. Recommend approval of Real Property Improvement Contract 19 and Lien Agreement and release of previously submitted bonds and agreement for Development Review 81 -05 submitted by Ameron, Inc. • Faithful Performance Bond $54,000 Labor A Material Bond $27,000 RESOLUTION NO. 83-168 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT AND RELEASING PREVIOUSLY ACCFPTSD BONDS AND AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW r 81 -05. H. Request approval of Release of X* for Tract 9435, 26 located north of Victoria and east of Haven Avenue, and issuance of a Notice of Completion. Owner: Crismar Development. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $117,000 • City Council Agenda Page 3 October 5, 1983 • RESOLUTIOL NO. 83 -169 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 9435 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. I. Approval to upgrade current copy equipment to more heavy 29 duty and more efficient system. Recommendation is to divest ourselves of the two IBM III copiers located in Administration and Community Development and replace them with Kodak 150s. 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ORDERING WORK IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 31 DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 7349• It is recommended that City Council approve the resolution ordering the work in connection with Parcel Map 7349, located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Route 15 frelway. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, 10 D. ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED 37 BETWEEN CALAVEEAS AND VINMAE AVENUES. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 83- 170 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED AN EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES. 5. NON - ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -112 32 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WnRF IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT. (PM 7340), 10 D. ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED 37 BETWEEN CALAVEEAS AND VINMAE AVENUES. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 83- 170 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED AN EAST /WEST ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN CALAVERAS AND VINMAR AVENUES. 5. NON - ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. City Council Agenda Page 4 October 5, 1983 6. CiTi MANAGER'S REPORTS A. SCHEDULING OF BUDGET ADOPTION MEETING. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. Y. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT • • • CLAIM FOR D.yMr GE OR IN Y w E 0> 7 V (£ z —CITY Ao rR�,�AN MHO CNCAMONCA 1 . Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal prooerty must be filed not ol,pt3loTioN 100 days after the occurrence (Gov, Code, Sec. 9{ 1 .2). SEP 22 1983 IR AM Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 ye7g8^J),JJMpKwrrepgd'M (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). r^'t�ts1�18 TO: CITY OF R•ilkcho Cucamonea 1d.al.ia- 1{. Smith 7558 [':goer St. 91730 714 987 -8342 _ 64 Name of Claimant Address Zio Fhone Pge 7558 Pe, ,'Pr St., Rancho Cucamonea. Ca. 91730 rddrees to which Claimant wishes notices sent. WHEN did damage or injury occur? February 27. 1983_ WHERE did damage or injury occur? 7 8 pe�uer SL . Rancho Cucamonea, Ca. 91730 HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur_ Inadequare flood on_krol rhnnnel` in Al ra Loma and Ra n. hn r,,rnmonga causing excess flooding condi- to Hellman Ave- which diverted the flooding iu this residence via _ La c Railroad Track. WHAT particular onion by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of emoloyees, if kno..o) fail r Ci.ty_of Rancho Cucamonga to eliminate this condition, which alsn occured three years prior to this date. WHAT sum no you claim? In,lude the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known of the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if pcesibl�i — . &aplaca_Caret •?nd linoleum _.__!_V_f_,_,_5 2,752.00 —_Sate cinL par rh • ns;..anrLL'aintiiu', -.. -. - -.— _ ---- -5 —_490. 00 -- Hiil{ N1 ark Wa.Li_: nrl 't� 1.11„ �l[Ld._1CCSCOLt:�_llaleb�ii <<i S 2 27LI. �� Bloc kanll was a prevent lvc mn�ds ur nl Xrirount Claimed: aNAMES and address,, of .vitnnssus, Drn ter. 110d H'spitnls: 4 14 L. SL. -OnL:r..Lio —Ca. 91764 _ _.- --- Glenn Rice. 5535 AmeLb 51 Alta Loma. Ca ._9170 I ANMk DATF r r -..n, Cd',ICLCCc -` t r CLAIM FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY 1. Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property must be flef r5t9irifebt5oll 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). ,CITY OF RANCHO CUC4Fi00A 1R. ADMIN*T 1ir•N Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than I year Myrrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). �JOJ 0 FN TO: CITY OF lo.ncho Cuc..:i- 02. 9:73:` V191D1O112111y2AA516 ! 987 -1;29 t d d: S• ? .L.ar" Blatnic'.: ;14 Cucamonga, _r'jw :te Cuamona, CA 91730 E7 k 6T V,, Name of Claimant Address Zip Phone Age _ oS,d 'rrow Rte C. :a, C` -i ^3: Address to which Claimant wishes notices sent. WHEN did damage or injury occur? 2;4' ^ecte:.ber WHERE did damage or injury occur? l,,n r. ..,'141 L1 t". Wn.. an 1_— HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? ^UCjLlyptUs 1in!c fa] line from tree aYa r.u'.' �, ,nd aaueiaE dnmp.re to roof and rain gutter. WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if known) WX1,vX 76t ;mown WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar us it may be known at the !ime of the a'esentation of this claim, togelher with the bnsis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible) $ 125.16 S Total Amount Claimed: $ 19:5.16 NAMES and addresscs of w4nesses, Dor tors cwj Hospitals: Ray Roles, station ttens!unt, ' 60 Foothill Blvd. C.kunmonaa, CA 917'0 r --inl, brook xn1 f: -11. 'tad r pprted it to me 'by tel ept:one. TF m (`C `t.rll4li- CLAIM FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY �Cc�'���•�- 1. Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property must be filed not later than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 9)1.2). R E C E I it E CITY Of RANCHO CUCALONCA Z. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 twhOW14416octarence (Gov, Code, Sec. 911,2). SE? 22 1983 TO: CITY OF MA „ „ „ „, ,, _ PN of Claimant Address Zip onP�fi a Age -'lDz-ak l)A,00- o -e- /)�rA4,,Na -. Qa, (>11'10 — Address to which Claimant wishes notices sent. WHEN did damage or injury occur?__ I3 /P-? I WHERE did damage or injury occur? („� Orr'jZr D lA' (�.Q/'I7I /Ag d /Cq Q/r1Ae) HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? .Z 4tlW3 H7 q Itept of 1r 1�� sovlien aw.rol," g rT� 4, ogvAr] Y•Sajar eyL. sf1� OUT F,nays., vs.-4- at,% 1 uwas M WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if known) Cmc ri4- l�l. WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation or this claim, together with the hasis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or ,,bills, if possible) p ]� S _ Total Amount Amount Claimed: NA ES and addresic5 of 'nllne.Los, Dorlors and Hospilnis: r i 06" TO: CLAIM Claims for death , injury to person, 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY CITY 0 MRANE I UCAMONOA or to personal property most be filed net Dl oteilhoilTlON Code, Sec. 911.2). SEP 26 IM Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than I (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). CITY OF �> .,t i�' Lt /,' l`.l tl' 4 At Glti��r� ALT-,A Lu,kA CAL- Address to which Claimant wishes notices sent. AN Ye°%lae�laa11�41FdiQ�4Ps IN Gt �sgHe� 7Y /D Phone vge WHEN did damage or injury occur? %-O Y, y ✓AT(' WHERE did damage or injury occur? HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? —/ WAS T r UrL, �R' l4' rl hoU' �.I,L!' A4I C'AJ iA ?L'P FS� i ,'(w r(:JP tn/Z> a F- r1I.ALLY r?rfe :.r FI L(60 yl Mir— WHAT particul,;r action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if known) WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: (Attach estimates or bills, if possible) Total Amount Claimed: NAMLS and addresses of witnesses, Donors and Hospilals: • r/ n` c- Fo vc e• h1 Y r, M,4()t'«G i „q Cr PfLLAL /�'✓LJ vEV'r hG-iiur I.tJ Go.u57-v ✓cj, CU ltw),�') h' (v T-( Pc_ /,4 /VA rrcowl uR� r� ou7- T� e rr�/ L SG f i�c's i f0 �' 2 (% /'•� / 4� r T C. V, v N t v e r s,a c_ Q S rr C e r f ✓o u T v e eL_ i V, ✓e &Z- DO VAOo . j 4¢ ✓e-yr- S%iiy S we..T ARCk ^•vP SAnW" /15I�Ir ?LT 0•y INt PVe ✓r ov��E,., Pi/ {t 9LF OF ;de /..oG� �v Fl, l9vAP 1 w<5'ti r 1-o 7-,4 T-c Cs p l c.cAC is ob7'hl.r/ cam_ i Tc %- C U. To 1-L T — ?�6c0 G /+ c,Y` _ Hiou•u7 Sgt AruLe- , • Tire c- Ktm fiG T—(, f, N 1--,rIjrIf Tit 4� 7-0 9,o -ee- p.TGi rr v4, iov i".ia niG • • E DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1983 City Council and City Manager 1977 Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician Approval of Parcel Map 7853, Bonds and Agreement submitted by Ron Martin and Associates and located on the West side of Hellman Avenue, North side of Church Street Parcel Map 7853 was approved by Planning Commission on March 23, 1983 for the division of 8.76 acres into 3 parcels within the R -1 zone located on the West side of Hellman Avenue, North of Church Street. Ron Martin and Associates has submitted bonds and agreement to guarantee the construction of off -site improvements it, the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $10,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 5,000.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 7853, bonds and agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to file said Map. Respectfully submitted, ; RK: j a a Attachments x �> bra u� CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMO,NGA /p title; ' ENGINEERING DIVISION E� � VICINITY MAP t 0 0 • 7 ;,4 ,x ,i T i S x li y r I� M o TENTATNE PARCEL MAP NO. 7853 CITY OF R R CIU CLC4lCWA CgMY pE 5m g3M o. STATE OF £ rJ NIA JWWt1', 1981 ' E 01WER - SUOMIMR' ' E�N&I.E£b V¢IUITY nA. GEWERAL NOf - RESOLUTION NO. 10- -D4CR' -3-1(. 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7853, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7853), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7953, submitted by Ron Martin and Associates, Subdivider, and nf 3 parcels, located on the West side of Hellman Avenue, North side Cf Church St—t being a division of a portion of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Subdivision "O" Cucamonga Vineyard Tract, recorded in Book ?0, Page 45 of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is In compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 1853 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: . 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 7853 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: 19 iJon`D. fii�ke s, Mayor "` Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk Jaa SCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 7853 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the Cl ly of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr- ed to as the City, by and between said City and Ronald R. Martin, Nausika F. Martin and E. Paul Tookovich, Trustee referred to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located on the west side of Heilman Avenue, north of Church Street; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met oy said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of Improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at • developer's expense all improvements described on page a hereof Within 12 man the from tie date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the dale of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default an the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 9 3. The Developer may request additional time in Which to complete the provisions of this agreement, In writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and Including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera- tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the Improvement security, and to require Adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. a. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply With the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any law- ful means, and thereupon to recover `ram said Developer and /or his Surety the full cast and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel. oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work Within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Non - compliance may result In stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right -of -way Improvement work required shall be Constructed in conformance With approved improvement Plans, Standard Sprcifications, and Standard Drawings and any special n n amendments thereto. CoStictinn Shall include any transitions and /or other incidental worx deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or ommiss ions discovered during construc- tion shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan ,0it if i c at i nos shall be covered by the pro visi On of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7, pork done within eslsting streets shall be diligent - ly pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of u j s 1f ied delay in completion, and to recover all cost and e}pe"P incurred from the O eveiop e and /or his contractor by any lawful means. R. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement. relocations, or removal of any oomocnent of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. Thr Developer shalt be rescons ible for rem ovat c' all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10, The D -,eloper shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director, 11. The Improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The Prin- cipal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown; E • CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For Improvement of: 4eil-mn Avenue Bate: J8/30/83 C0—pPM ej py: v.ary n — File Rence: M 7g�City Dv9, No` NOTE: Does net include current fee for writing permit or pavement deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 1?EN UA'I rY U_LT 'UNIT CCST S AvC 'IT P.C.L. Cure - 12" C.F. 110 L.F. 7.00 S 77) P.C,C. Cure - 8- C.F. P.C.C. Cure only 6^ C.F. A.C. Berm (5200 min.) V P.C.C. Sidewalk 660 S.F. 2.00 S1,2:; 6" Orive Approach B" P.C.L. Cross Butter 280 S.F. 3.00 1 8 41 Street Excavation 250 C 'Y. 3.113 S 71. Imported Embenkrent Preparation of Suegrade 220e S.F. .10 S 22i Crushed Aggregate Base (per in, thick) A.L. (aver 1300 tons) A.C. (900 to 1300 tons) A.L. (under 500 to 900 tons) P.C. (under 500 tans) 2200 S.F. .55 11,21D • Patch A.C. (trench) thick Overlay Adjust sewer manhole to grade Adjust sewer clean out to grade Adjust water valves to 9r aqe Street lights I EA 1500,00 SI,SC, . Street Signs Street Trees 2 EA 75,00 S 153 ImvoParkway Landscipe and Irrigation Improvement Pions E.i. 5500. CO S1,SG3 CONS! °UCTION COST S 8243.00 CONF(AGENCY COSTS 1 1.661,00 _- TOTAL CONSTRUCTION S 9 928Oo FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SURETY (100X) 1101000,00 LABOR A40 MATERIAL SECURITY (50:) S 5.000.06 EN614EERl4G INSPECTION FEE S 310.00 •RESl00AT; 39/x'. INEAi(ON f.ASN UFFOSIT _ I It000.W (REFUNDABLE) wWiIPEVATION WRfTY (CASH) _S 1 500,00 *Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 1, Chapter 1,08, adri San 8nrnardino County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash restoration /delfoeatinn deposit shall he made prior to Issuance of an Ervlinngring Construction Permit. .a. Is ,. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE • Type: Bow Principal Amount: 510,000.00 q ad address of surety: Len Miller Insurance Brockers, Inc. �rvi na Elva., Tustin, C.1 92630 Pldj MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Bond Principal Amount: $ 5,000.00 Name and address of surety: same CASH DEPOSIT MONUMEMTATION Type: Cash Principal Amount: S 1,50:. ^O Name and add —t of Ronald Martin 8 Assoc.1� ecupprety: 18315 CcuntryTOoBE Pb STi "TO 4'CIT1' Or*W'TORC ADC[EO TANC!'l B'I 14 WITRESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused thes. =. presents to be duly exec ed and ac knp ledge +ith all fendlit'¢5 required by lar or the e(, ¢ �oppsite their signatures. Date 6— $3 by Developer a, Ron o�t.� gn W U.r %a"la f'r'1 %a/e MS Ems% fr rt Pr,nced d v Date R —/6— S3 cy ��'��`�•', Developer SnaWre ,y 57 Pxu1 Tr1�c „��l,Trtis`P� --F-- rioted Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: y Approved DEVELOPFR'S SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED CI 3 • R%FCOTRD IN TRZPLIC,•,T^ BOND Gn, 7124803 ^� PRFMIUM: $200.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND MNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho CJCamdngd, Stata of Catiforn ta' and RONALD N. MARTIN, NAUSIHA MARTIN and F PAUL" (hereinafter designated as pr nclpa have enterc Into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated pool Is Improvements, which said agreement, dated , 198 , and Identified as Project Parcel Map 1853 is hereby referre J-to and made a Dert hereof; and, as ^`^ ^� ^•'^^ -- '- aatee of the E. PAUL TONPORiTCH- PROFFFSIONA. CORPORATION AMENDED PROFIT SHARING TrU ST (collectively) WHEREAS, said principal Is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of sa•.d agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, we the principal and FIRI ANS rJYD Tilpt? •'fie COMPANY as surety, are held and firmly bound unto ibe CTty�ancno Cucamonga Ihereinafter called ^City')• in the penal sum of ten thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($10,000.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be Made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the abovo bounded principal, his or Its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof mxlo • as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed At the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall in:emnify and save harmless City, Its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this del fgation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. 19 As A part of the obligation secured hereby and In addit,om to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, Including reasonable attorney s fees. Incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and Included in any Judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci- fications accompanying the some shall In anywise affect its obligations an this bond, and It does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed by the princlp al and surety above named, on Septemhor 19, , 198 3 N. MARTIN. NAUSIRA MARTIN and F. PAUL [CH as truetee of the E. PAI,L T0NNOFICII- FtPF.R ANg FI!Fp tN SiI PANCF CnN PANY iI O�'ALr 4F NG (collectively Oev oper eta BY '.).A tn.G II. (, °s^ BY l�I.l ;tom nature( I tuvhl, n- F6cCl— Z,l)o {•.�I�` -r �Y'�•s'feP P.n. Nichols, jr, PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED ROB' Nn, 71IaRn3A ESCNT. F.❑ IV TR IPhZCATF. PPE-IZUM: Included in Per(ormanee LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND Bond • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and RONALD W. "RTIN, NAl'S3`A MARTIN -GD r PAUL-- (hereinafter designated as "principal "; have entered into an agreement whereby principal Agrees to install and complete certain designated public Improvements, which said agreement, dated 1 195 and identified as project Parcel Map 1853 is ere fer y reredd Ip and made A pa,t hereof; and am TONFOVICIT As trustee of the F. PAUT. . NvCYVXCP- PnnrFSSInFAL CORPORATION AMENDED PROFIT SPANINO mo,CS^. (collectively) WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is rcguired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the Fixv of a Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made il Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, matar•al men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to In the aforesaid Code or Civil Procedure In the sum of Five thousand and OD /100 Dollars (S5,000.00), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same In an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabnve set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing Such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as casts and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. • It Is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall Inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies arl corporations entitled to file claims under Title It (commencing with Section 3082 of Part 4 of Div ison 3 of the Civil Code, sn as to give a right of action to them or their ass ions in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condi• ion of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall on and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and apneas that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its ob e pill on this bond, and it dos he,,.- by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly eeecited by the principal and surely above named, on Seot'l.,, 1 , 1983 P'. °AR^T.- NAUSIPA MAPTt`- end r. PAUL Ft RTM)%mS ^I ^T I °gen I� PANY Pi! ,i.v Ecu s[nieve Tapers n7 the F.. PAVL urrty} CH- PROPRSGIONAL CORPOPATIOR SNA RI4R TRUST (v cnllrctively _ FY 6'...J ,- /.,,_;;,TAtt y- aene in -Fact — // 1 II.N. Nichols, I Slanetu F,nj - "- PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST RE NOTARIZED • 11 • I n A XTnvn ^nn n T In NYO n Ameron, Inc. has submitted the attached real property improvement contract and lien agreement to replace the bonds and agreement approved by City Council on October 7, 1981 for the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue for project, 0. R. 81 -05. D.R. 81 -05 was approved by Planning Commission on March 11, 1981 for the addition of a 34,900 sq. ft, building. The approved conditions provided for the improvements of Arrow Route prior to occupancy and the acceptanL� of a lien agreement for the improvements on Etiwanda Avenue, Ameron, Inc. submitted an agreement and bonds for the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue and are now replacing this with a real property improvement contract and lien agreement. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and releasing the Bonds and Agreement accepted by Council on October 7, 1981. Respec fully submitted,,. L RH: BK a Attachments 1 STAFF REPORT }�?j t: x s DATE: October 5, 1983 - -. TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and release of previously submitted bonds and agreement for Development Review 81 -05 submitted by Ameron, Inc. Ameron, Inc. has submitted the attached real property improvement contract and lien agreement to replace the bonds and agreement approved by City Council on October 7, 1981 for the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue for project, 0. R. 81 -05. D.R. 81 -05 was approved by Planning Commission on March 11, 1981 for the addition of a 34,900 sq. ft, building. The approved conditions provided for the improvements of Arrow Route prior to occupancy and the acceptanL� of a lien agreement for the improvements on Etiwanda Avenue, Ameron, Inc. submitted an agreement and bonds for the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue and are now replacing this with a real property improvement contract and lien agreement. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and releasing the Bonds and Agreement accepted by Council on October 7, 1981. Respec fully submitted,,. L RH: BK a Attachments 1 CITY O IZz1 \CI10 cu(,:A \IU\(;:\ PLANNING DIVISION 1-1 17A 1111 j:: I,oc„4 W4 MAP 0 KORTI I • RESOLUTION N0. 10- 83 — le, E' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT AND RELEASING PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BONDS AND AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 81 -05 WHEREAS, Development Review 81 -05, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ameron, Inc. was approved on June 1, 1982; and WHEREAS, Installation of improvements to Etiwanda Avenue established as prerequisite to issuance of a building permit has been met by entry into a Real Property improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Ameron, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California as follows: SECTION 1: Does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorize the Mayor and,City Clerk to sign same and direct the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. • SECTION 2: Does authorize the release of bonds and agreement accepted by City Council on June 2, 1982 for Development Review 81 -05. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren ­M. City Clerk jaa 19 Jon D. ike s, ayor • RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CU�AMONGA P. 0. Box 907 RANCHO CUC.AMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 0.EAL PROPERTY IMPROV E_MENT CONTP ACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT D.R. 91 -05 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19, by and between A.,eron, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Geveloper "), and the CITY ,. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a runicfoal corpar,. on (hereinafter referred to as "City "), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the • issuance of a building permit for industrial development, ire City required the construction of missing off -site street Improvements incindinq curb, gutter, asphalt paving and appurtenant work adjacent to the property to be developed; and 19 WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the )Qv a lop or enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to cans t ur.I said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said Improvements if the lev ".toper fa.li or eagleCf, t0 do so and that the City shall hn,e a lien upon the real Proprrty hereinafter described as security for the levnlnper's oerfor.mnnrn, and any red aym ant djr City, ROW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: • I. The Developer hereby agrees that it will install off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt paving and appurtenant work as descr iced in Impro',onent Agreement D.F. 81 -05 dated August 24, 1981, 1n accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the in s a l l at i en. Said Improvements shall be installed upon and along Etivanda Avenue. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed no later than one (1) year followinm written notice -.a the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same, installation of said improvments shall be at no expense to the Cfty. 3. In the event the Developer shall fail or refuse to • complete the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, ,,,,,.h giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in comDietinq said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, thn Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described real orCporty sltdated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cuunty of San 8e r gar d in o, State of Cal if arni a, to - wit: Parcnl 1: The Northerly 409.92 feet of Lot 1, Tract 5377, as per map recorded In Book 62, Page 90 of Maps, In the Office of the County Recorder of said County. • 2 Parcel 2: The East 25 acres of the North 50 acres of the out east 114 of Section 8, Township 1 South, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, ace rding to Government Survey, Parcel 3: All that certain real property situated in the County oU- San -Tern ard l no, State of California and being a portion of Lot 1 as said lot is shown on that certain map entitled Tract No, 5377 recorded it Book 62, Page 90 of Maps, records of said San Bernardino County, said portion being more particularly described as Rol lows: BEGINNING At a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 1, distant thereon South 0° 24' Z5• west 77I.8Z feet from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 1; thence from said point of beginning South 89° 51. 46• East, 1,325.49 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said line of said Lot 1; thence along last said Easterly line North 0. 22' SS- East 767.73 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 1; therce along the Westerly line of said Lot E, South Be 24• ZS" West 771.82 feet to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the Northerly 409.82 feet of the above mentioned Lot 1. 5, This conveyance is in trust for the purposes described above. 6. Nan, therefore, if the 0eveloDer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things by it to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it shall remain to full force and effect and in all respects shah be considered and treated as A mortgage on the real property an; the right, and obligations of the parties hi in respect there;, shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of tie State of California, and any othar applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7, 'Upon completion by Developer of installation of the improv a ments contemplated hereby, the City agrees to re,Olsty to Developer, its successors and assigns, the City's entire interest in the subject property Se as to eliminate this Agreement as a lien of record. R. Th:; 4grenvent Shall be binding upon and shall inure In the beerf It of the heirs, ea2Cgtors, admix lstratp rt, sue' ^s snrs a,I as, 19,, of ench it Ihn p,,t,n, hereto. 19 13 9. To the extent re gu)red to give effect of this • Agreement a s mortgage, the tern 'Developer' shall be "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and any other Statute perta in fng to lortages on real property, 10, if legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum Which the City is entitled to recover from the DevelOper hereunder or to fOreclOse the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its cults aPJ such reasonable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. • a • • • it -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enginee SUBJECT: Release of Bonds �� cucsnrati v c n 4'i T Dli Q }. F F_! � Z i 1971 Tract No. 9435 - located North of Victoria and East of Haven Avenue OWNER: Crismar Development Corp. P. 0. Box 2131 Santa Monica, CA 90406 ACCEPT Maintenance Bond $5,850.00 RELEASE Faithful Performance Bond (Road) 5117,000.00 The road improvements have been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that City Council accept the roads, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize release of the Faithful Performance Bond. r i • RESOLUTION N0. e'3 —/Z. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 9435 AND AU7dORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 9435 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk jaa 11 Jon D. Mikels, Mayor 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Be. 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: TRACT 9435 located North of Victoria and East of Haven Avenue 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY 7E RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. • 3. On the 5tt d;y of October, 1983, t`ere was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for; Tract 9435 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Crismar Development Corp. S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Tract 9435 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date; October 5, 1983 �o'yd Nabbs, - ty n9 — -r re, u • J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: October 5, 1983 To: Citv Council From: Finance Director Subject: Copv Machine(s) Replacement Ci CA.yf) Over the past two (2) years the City has been experiencing a series of serious breakdowns with the copy equipment currently being used by staff. What this has meant is periods of long waits before the equipment was operational agnia. In defense of the IBM repairmen, they do respond appropriately, the problem is they are here sc much people think they are staff, and as often as they are here, maybe thev should be. The City has been experiencing on -going problems with the Adminis- tration ropier that have never been resolved, mitigated somewhat at times, but never eliminated. As a result of this on -going situation, IBM and Kodak were contacted for help in resolving this problem. Both companies were met with and the problem outlined to them and proposals for changes, upgrade of equipment were solicited. Both companies submitted proposals for replacing the non t. Kndall responded once more with a follow up meeting to explain their proposal. IBM has to respond to a follow up meeting set for the week of September 19th, 1983. The analysis performed indicates, from a labor analysis, soft and hard dollar cost that a savings does occur on an annual basis when using Kndak equipment of $1,383.36. Also, with the Kodak 150, 881.77 man hours are effectively saved, or more efficiently used in the process. (See the attnrhed analysis sheet). 'file problem is not one of gust sending the IBM's hack and bringing in the Kodak 150's, but one of selling or unloading, if you will, the One TBM ropier we own, or are still paying for. Having advertised, and searched for a buyer, it turns out that there is no market for a used, unreconditioned copy machine. The City still owes $11,272.00. TBM, doesn't want it, Kodak doesn't want It. the brokerage firms won't touch it. Kodak, therefore, said it would boy it for 51,000, which isn't bad considering It isn't worth a nickel; and thev will also for -go the list month Ieaso pnyr:r,nt on both new copiers. This amounts to total of $4,1100, mitigating somewhat 1'he totil payoff factor to $7, 272.00. Kee ornv nda t fin: i•.iv off the halanry duo on the TBM copy machine by approprintion in the 83 -8; Budpot. Award a contract to the Kodak compnnv for the le.aioh ont of two (2) Knd.nk 150 with finisher:;, and then adjust lho Budcot .icrordini:ly. An nitornativv L, to rnntinur paving off the il0i copfor at rntc we Are rnrrently doing so, huwrver, n ronsidrrahlo aImonnt of interest ran be saved by plying if off a)1 at once. An wnv the Jorislou NOS, the Clty wilt still have to pav for the InM III c!:pier. I. '1 TOTAL 72000 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: SAVINGS _= TOTAL ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: 25.33 B.17 33.50 f B.17) 2149.57 -0.40 14.41 14.01 ( 14.41) 633.90 4*TIME INCLUDES UASTE.FATIGUE AND ANY FINISHING OPERATIONS �n LJ • L A B 0 R A N A L Y S I S • 07/27/83 ' CURRENT CONFIGURATION MACHINE OPERATOR TOTAL MONTHLY JOB TIME TIME TIME JOB MODEL VOLUME OPJ CPO TYPE (HR /MO) (HR /MO) (HR /MO) I IBM 3 60 U /ADF 8000 50X 100 SO 2.23 0.3B 2.6, ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 0.38) 3 IBM 3 60 WADE 40000 5OX 20 SD 11.42 1.96 13.38 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 1.96) 5 IBM 3 60 U /ADF 8000 IX 2 SS 6.46 10.55 17.01 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS f 10.55) 7 IBM 3 60 U /ADF 8000 3X 300 SS 2.67 5.51 8.18 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 5.51) 9 IBM 3 60 U /ADF 8000 4X 100 SS 2.15 4.18 6.33 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 4.18) TOTAL - -------- 72000 ------- 24.93 ------- 22.58 ------ 47.50 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 22.58) EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: 1515.67 PROPOSED CONFIGURATION ---------------------- -' ---"----------- --- MACHINE OPERATOR TOTAL MONTHLY JOB TIME TIME TIME JOB MODEL VOLUME OPJ CPO TYPE (HR /MO) (HR /MO) (HR /MO) 2 EK 150AF COPIER 8000 50X 100 SIi 1.91 0.09 2.00 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 0.09) 4 EK 150AF COPIER 40000 5OX 20 SD 9.70 1.62 11.32 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 1.62) 6 EX 150AF COPIER 8000 1X 2 SS 9.85 6.28 16.13 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 6.28) B EK. ISOAF COPIER 8000 3X 300 SS 1.93 0.08 2.01 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS ( 0.08) 10 EK 150AF COPIER 8000 0 100 SS 1.95 0.10 2.04 ABSOLUTE GPERATDR HOURS ( 0.10) TOTAL 72000 ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: SAVINGS _= TOTAL ABSOLUTE OPERATOR HOURS EFFECTIVE COPIES /HOUR: 25.33 B.17 33.50 f B.17) 2149.57 -0.40 14.41 14.01 ( 14.41) 633.90 4*TIME INCLUDES UASTE.FATIGUE AND ANY FINISHING OPERATIONS �n LJ •