Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/09/16 - Agenda Packet PAGE City Council Agenda September 1ti, 1992 t All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in wr(ling. The deadline for submitting these items Is 5:0g p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives ail such items. A. GAL! Tn nRnFp 1. Roll Call: Buquet _. Alexander_,STauf _. Wil(am5 _, antl Wright- @. ANNO N MEurc;pR NTA TIONc 1. Presentation of Proclomation designating the week of October 4 through October 11, 1992 as NaYrve Ameriaon Week. C COMMUNICATIONC cwnu Tuo onar rr This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council, State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously includetl on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony antl set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONC NT .ei FNnea The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine antl non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1 ~ Approval of Minutes: August 5. 1992 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/26/92 and 9/2/91; and 1 Payroll ending 8/27/92 for the fotol amount of $1 A69.336.pp. 3, Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31. 1992, g 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for 21-OK Solo General for Alpha Beta Company. Alpha Beta Store 8235.6753 Carnelian. 13 PAGE Clty Council Agenda September 16, 199: y 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for 21-Off Sole General for Alpha 15 Beta Company, Alpha Beta Store N178, 9640 Base Une Rood. 6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General, Off-Sale 17 Beer 8; Wine, for Thrifty Corpora ion (P-12), Thrifty Corporation, 8760 19th Street. 7. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General, Off-Sale 19 Beer & Wine, for Thrifty Corporation (P-12), Thrifty Corporation. 9650 9ase Line Road. 8, Approva! to transfer 540.000.00 from Fund 76-41367920 }o Account 21 No. JS-41366028 for adddional appraisal and consultant work for CFD 88-2. 9. Approval of an Appeal fo Variance 92-02 -Silva - An appeal of the 22 Planning Commission's decision to deny the request to retluce the required interior side yard se?back from 5 feet to 6 inches from the property line for a single family home in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre). located at 10077 Ironwood Stre} -APN: 1077-047-64. RESOLUTION NO. 92-242 23 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. UPHOLDING i HE APPEAL AND APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 92.02. REDUCING THE RE9UIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 6 INCHES FROM THE PROPERTY UNE FOR A SINGLE FHMILY HOME IN THE !OW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). LOCATED AT 10077 IRONWOOD STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-041-64 10. Approval fo designs}e the Central Public School (also known as 26 Sweeten Halp. located at 9324 Son Bernardino Rood, as a Historic Landmark -APN: 208-I l 1-09. RESOLUTION NO. 92-243 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI1V COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-01, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOL (SWEETEN HALT.), LOCATED AT 9324 BAN BERNARDINO ROAD. AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK, AND MAKING FINDINv31N SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 209-111-09 PAGE City Council Agenda September 16, 1992 3 11. Approvol to execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 92- 44 063) for additional appraisal of CFD 88-2 not to exceed S28.000.00, to be funded from Account No. 75-0130~(Y2S. 12. Approvol to grant a Construction and Maintenance Easement to 46 the Scuthem California Edison Company to provide service at the Sports Complex Project on Anow Highway and Rochester. 13. Approval To execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation ~ of o Portion of o Master Planned STOfrT1 Drain Facility in conjunction with development of Tract No. 12820. located in Jasper Street approximately 180 feet north and 360 feet south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Southland Development Corporation. RESOLUTION N0.92-244 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CffV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 12820 14. Approvol of Parcel Map 11287 and Improvement Security Riders, 50 located of the northwest comer of Church Street and Elm Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes of Caldomio. RESOLUTION N0.42-245 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOftNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. i 1287 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURIN RIDERS 15. Approvol to exe^ute Improvement Agreement Extension Tor 54 Tract 12832 -Day Creek Boulevard, located on proposed Doy Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION N0.92-246 56 .4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT $ECURITV FOR TRACT 12832 -DAY CREEK BOULEVARD PAGE City Council Agenda September i6, 1992 q 76. Approval to accept improvements, Release of Bonds and file a 57 Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 11685, located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue, Release: Fai}hiul Performance Bond (Street) S E0.000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) SAOO.OD RESOLlJT1ON N0.92-247 58 A RESOLUTION OF THE C(fV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENITS FOR PARCEL MAP 11685 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 17, Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and file a 59 notice of completion for Parcel Map 11838, loco}etl on the northwest comer Of Base Line Rood and Victoria Pork Lane. Release: Faithful Pertormance Bond (Street) S60B.COD.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92-248 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRV COUNCIL OF THE CfTV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMEMS FOR PARCEL MAP 11838 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 18. Approval to release Mainterance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13748 61 - Banyan Street Bridge, located on Banyan S}reei at the Deer Creek Channel. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond S 22.900.00 19. Approval to accept the Basketball Hardcartt Retrofit Pro)ecT, CO 6P 92-022, as Complete. Release Bonds and authorize the Community Development Director to file a Notice of Completion. Release: Faithful Pertormance Bond $ gq,(p7,p0 PAGE City Council Agenda September 16, 1992 5 RESOLUTION N0.92-249 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEP-NG THE PUBIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BASKETBALL HARDCOURT RETROFIT PROJECT AS COMPLETE AT CHURCH STREET AND YJINDROWS PARK AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLE710N FOR THE WORK 20. Approval to accept the 1992 Tree Planting Program, CO No. 92-039, 64 as Complete, Release Bonds and cuthorae the City Engineer To file a Notice of Completion. RESOLUTION NO. 92-250 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIN COUNCIL OF THE CffV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1992 TREE PLANiTNG PROGRAM. CO 92-039, AND AUTHORVNG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will reatl the title. Any Item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND RM'T 2 Q IIR M NTS FOR TAXI AB S RV! ORDINANCE NO. 501 (second reading) 66 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH'e CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COCE BV ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.30 ENTITLED 'TAXICAB SERVICE,' THEREIN REGULATING AND PERMITTING THE OPERATION OF TAXIS 2. CONSIDERATION OF STAB (SHIN' AN IMPROV M NT AR A WITH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 9T-1 fVICTO RIA COMMIINITV) AND AUTHORIZATION TO I~/Y AN ADDITIONAI $PECIAI TAX PAGE City Council Agenda September 16, 1992 6 ORDINANCE NO. SD2 (second readir>g) 74 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI1V OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFOfNJIA, AUiHORVJNG THE LEW OF A SPECIAL TAX IN AN IMPROVEMEM AREA OF AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. Tha Chalr will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSID RATION OF APP A OF .ONDITIONA CF P RMR 91- 7 - 83 .AR KAROH R M RPRIS S INS, - An appeal of conditions of approval pertaining to the awning color and design and the landscaping for Conditional Use Permit 91-37, a request to construct a 3275 square foot fast food restaurant (with drive-}hru) within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commerclol designation of the Terra Vista Pbnned CommunBy, located at the southeast comer of Bose Une Road and Milliken Avenue • APN: 227-151-21. RESOLU110N N0.92-251 118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-37, AND DENYING AN APPEAL Of CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PERTAINING TO THE AWNING COLOk AND DESIGN AND THE LANDSCAPING, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 3,275 SQUARE f00T FAST FOOD RESTAURAM (WITH DRIVE-THRU) WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION Of THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 151-21 PAGE CHy Council Agenda September 16, 7992 7 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The Tollowing items have no legal puhllcai!~~ or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF SIGN PERMIT 92-141 -TEXACO - An 121 appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying ine installation of a canopy sign at on existing service station wfihin the Special Commercial District of The Foothill Boulevard Spec'rfic Plan, totaled of 8166 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-112-20. RESOLUTION NC. 92-252 140 A RESOLlTION OF THE CfTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING SIGN PERMIT 92-141 RE9UESi1NG THE INSTALLATION OF A CANOPY SIGN AT AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION WITHIN THE SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DIBTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8166 FOOTNILL BGULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-112-20 2. CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR RELOCATION OF 142 TRAFFIC GIGNAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF srREET IMPROVEMEI~S AT 7HE tOLITHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOIILFVARD AND H4~N AVFNI FORTH HAVEN AV NIE WID NIN -PROI 7( ON~ ~].~331ill) RESOLUTION N0.92-253 144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A POR?tON OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND CONSfRUCTiON OF STREE7 IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF PAGE City Council Agenda -uGL September 16, 1992 g H. CITY MANA .FR'S CTe FF RFpn RTe The following Items do nat Iegaily require any publlc testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO WITHDRAW TH XISTI ~ ANN XA7101~ 150 ~PPIICATIONS EI DIN ON I ~N TION l ITH 7H D l I OPA FN OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SP 'FI PI AN -The City Council Subcommittee recommends that the City Counci! accept }heir recommendation to wtthdraw IAFCO Annexations No. 2624 and No. 2625 in that there a no County support or other property owner support for the annexation requests at this time, 2. CONSIDERATION OF T NANT I AS A R M NT ( O 9 -OG^_1 153 BETWEEN THE (`IN nF Deni('uF1 r^nrenennicn nn,n in BAS BA 1 IN .. I. GO IN d B iRIRFSS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. No items Submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOH NEXT M ETIN Thts is the time for City Council to Identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only Identilled for the next meeting. K. .OMM lulcennuc FRnAI TRF pppr I<` This is the time and place for the general publlc to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments ere to be limited to live minutes per Individual. 1. Request from Miliie Glenney of the Windrows community to waive 154 fee for use of sound mondor for neighborhood picnic. PAGE City Council Agenda September i6, 1992 9 L. ADJOURN~YjENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO A JOINT MEETING WRH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1992, 7:00 P.M. IN THE RAINS CONFERENCE ROOM, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. I, Debra J. Adams. City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby cenity that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 10, 1992, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. August 5, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CI'CY CO[1NCIL MBVU'fES A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, August 5, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10508 Civic Center Drava, Rancho Cucamonga. California. The meeting was called m ortler at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William 7. Alexander, Charles 1. Bugtret H, Diane Williams, Pamela 1. Wrigh4 and Mayor Dennis L, Stout. Also present wen;: lack Lam, City Manager; lames Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager, Jerry B. Fulwuod. Deputy Ciry Manager, Bmd Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Jce ONeal, City Engineer, lira Hart, Administrative Services Director; lira Fros[, City Treasurer, Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; loan Kruse, Purchasing Agent: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst SI; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. •~~«~• B I. Presentation of Proclamation to Jim Han far his service to die City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Stout presented a Proclamation and City Tile to Iim Hart for his outstanding service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. B2. Presenmtion of AwarJ for Excellence in Financial Reporting. Mayor Stout presented the Award for Excellence in Financial Reporting m Jim Han. w+~~~s CI. Frank Williams, 5400 Hermosa, Apt. D, and also with the Building Industry Assceintion, complimented Councilmcmher Buquct for the good job he has done on the SANBAG Board relating m the. Caltrans issues. He also presented written information to the Council regarding the Congestion Management Program. He referred to the copy of the Ieuer dated August 5, 1992 he had sent W the City Council regarding SANBAG's budget to promote regional government and new programs. He added he did nor agree how the money was being spent. City Council Minutes August 5, 1992 Page 2 Councilmembcr Buquct stared he also had some of the same concerns and felt stiff should review these matters and come back to the Council with addiuorml information. •~~r~• O- CONSENT CAL_F.N!!po Dl. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/ISry2 (FY 91ry2), 7/15N2 (FY 92ry3), 722/92 (FY 91N2), and 72282 (FY 92N3); and Payroll ending 7/1/92 and 7/1Cy92 for the total amount x($2,960,870.35. D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 1992. D3. Alcoholic Bevemge Application for Ifi Sale Bcer & Wine Eatlng Place for EI Dorado, Adela Cardenas, .4lcjandro de Leon and Vella de Leon, 10134 Foothill Boulevard. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Applicafion for Of(Salx General for Sunrise Liquor, James V. Clarke, Margo Quinn and Laurence W, Stephens, 8679 Bare Line Road. D5. Alcoholic Bevemge Applicaton for Off Sate General for Sunrire Liquor, laxmi Investrnent Corporation, 8679 Base Line Road. Db. Alcololic Bevemge Application for Off Sale Generel for Perry's Rarrcho Market, Forrett L, and Lillianne Perry, 9477 Foothill Boulevard. D7. Approval to Destroy City Records and Documents which arc no longer required as provided under Government Cnde Section 34090. RESOLUTION N0.92-218 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORMA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS A:VD DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 3d(19p DR. Approval of Appointment m fill vacancy on the Raxho Cucamonga Community Foandalion Board of Dirccmn. D9. Approval m execute agreements with California Youth Soccer AssociaGrm (CO 92-045), AIm Loma LiWe League (CO 92-046), Rancho Cucamonga Softball aka Miss Softball (CO 92-047), Rancho Cucartronga Womens Soccer League (CO 92-048) Rancho Litde League (CO 92-049), Rancho Cucamonga Spirits (CO 92-050), American Yowh Soccer Organivation ~ Region 65 (CO 92-051 ), Deer Canyon LiWe League (CO 92.052), A.C.E. Youth SnfRull (CO 92-053), and V iceyaM Little League (CO 92-054) for use of athletic fields and facilities. DIO. Approval to execute Use Agreement (CO 92-0SS) beCwxen the City and the Etiwanda School District to conduct Recrawon Classes al Windrows Elementary School. DI I. Approval to execua: Memorandum of Undersmnding (CO 92056) for Dmg Abuse Resistance Education (U.A.R.E.)f~r Fiscal Year 1992/93. D12, Approval to execute annual contract amendment (C090-0fl2)for the CAL-ID System City Council Minutes August 5, 1992 Page 3 D13. Approval m execute an Extension of the Agreement (CO R9-136) [or the Haven Median Islands and San Bernardino County Flood Conbol Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Comract wish Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated, of South EI Monte, California, in the amount of $168,845.43 to be Funded by: General Fund, OI-4647-6028 (532,550.16); San 8emardino County Reimbursement Fund OS-4647-6028 (542211.06); Landscape Maintenance Disuict 1 Fund, 404130-6(128 ($11,170.06); Landscape Mainterurce District 4 Fund, 43- 4130-6028 (521,897.28); and landscape Maintenance District 3H Fund, 464130-60]8 (561,016.85). D14, Approval to execute an Extension of the Agreement (CO 92-011) Pot dte Citywide Trce Maintenance Agreement to Golden Bear Arborists, hncorporated, of Monrovia, California in the amount of $184,130.00 m be Funded by General PurM. OI.4647-6028 (5140.000.0); LMD-0, 43-4130.6028 ($3,500.00): LMD-6, 45-01305028 (55,430.00); LMD-3B, 46-41305028 {$16.000.00); LMD-7, 474130-6028 (518,400.00) and LMD-S, 48-0130- 6028 ($800.00). D15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Impmvement Security and Monumentation Cash Deposit (a Tmct 13753, located at the noMwesl wmer of Kenyon Way and Belvino West, submitted by Lewis Homes of California, and Release of Previously submitted Improvement Agreement. Improvement Security and Monumentation Deposit accepted by City Council on August 21, 1991, (mm Perpetual Asset Management Company, Incorpomted. RESOLUTION N0.92-219 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND MONUMENTATTON CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT' NO, 13753 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURTTY AND MONUMENTATION DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 21, 1991 .ITEM RF.MOVEU FROM11 AGENDA DI7. Approval to accept Improvements, Release o(Bonds and Notiw of Completion for DR 88-09, locatod on the wc51 side o(Mapie Piace NorN of Artnw Highway. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (StrecO S 6,000.00 RESOLUTION N0.42-221 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEtv1EN-f5 FOR DR 88-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NUTICE OF COMPLETION FOR T}IL• WORK City Council Minutes August 5, 1992 Page 4 D18. Approval m accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for DR 89-21, located on the northeast comer o(Spmce Avenue and White Oak Avenue, Release: Faith(W Perfomance Bond (Streets) S 30,500.00 FaiNful Performance Bond (Spruce Median) $ 43,000.00 RESOLUTION N0.92-222 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL~ORMA, ACCEPTWG THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FAIR DR 69-21 AND AUTHORIZING THE Fll-WG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FDR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander m approve the Consent Calendar with dte exception of Item D16 which was removed from the agenda. Motion cartied turanimously, S-0. •~.r~a No items were submined. ~~~«.. FL CONSIDER ITION OF ENV RONM1 h At ACCFSSt. NT AND DFVELOPb ENT DISTRICT AMFNDMFNT R9-07 - CO rrtnvFST D SI •N RO m - A request m amend the Development Districts Map from Low-Medium Residential (441 dwelling units per acn;) m Medium Residrntial (8-14 dwelling units per acm) for five acres of land IocateA on the north side of Base Line Road, west of Alfa Ctasta Drive - APN: 202-025-01,04, 07, 08, 12, 13, and 14. Related Files: Tentative Tract 14208 and Tree Removal Permit 9I-40. Staff report presented by ban Coleman, Principal Flanner. Mayor Stout opened die meeting (or public hearing. These being no response, the public hearing was closeA. Councilmember Wright inquired as m the boundaries involved wish the amendment. Councilmember W it Hams ezpmssed a corrcem for the people living in this area looking out on the channel wall and the graffiti in that ama, She tell ii needed to be watched closely or have a Mt of landscaping there. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, sated they world ask that Ote larger boz aces be planted Della 1. Adams, City Ctcrk, read the title of ONinance No. 499 City Council Minuses August 5, 1992 Page 5 ORDDANCE N0.499 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 89-07, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM "LM" (LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, 4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO "M" (MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, 8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOA FlVE ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD. WEST OF ALTA CUESTA DRIVE - APN: 202-025-01, 04, 07, O8, 12, 13, AND 14, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buque4 seconded) by Williams so waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MOTON: Moves by Buquet, seconded by Alexander m set second reading for August 19, 1992. Motion carried 4-1 (Wright no.) rrrrrr F2. ONSID RATION TO FORMS PARA IMPROVE ENT REA WITHI COM INITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-I (ITEM REQUESTED TO BE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 2,1992) MOTON: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to contlnue the item m September 2, 1992. Motlon camieU unanimously, 5-U. rrrrrr F3. CONSIDERA'TON TO AMEND CHAPI-ER a OR OF THE RANCHO CUCBMONGA MIIM IC PAL OC DE TO ALLOW COMPET177VE NF_GOTI TIA_ON Staff report presented by lim Hart, Adminisvalive Services Dirasor. Mayor Ssout opened dte mceUng for public hearing, There being no msponse, the public hearing was closed. Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk, read dsc lisle of Ordinance No. 500. ORDINANCE. NO. 500 (first mading) AN ORDINANCE OF THL CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.08.090 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECfJON 3.OR.090 (F) PERTAINING TO PURCHASES BY COMPETTTTVE NEGOTIATTON MOTION: Moved by Wright. seconded by Williams m waive full reading and set saond reading of Ordinance No. 5(p for August 19, 1992. Molinn cartied unanimously, 5-0. rrrrrr F4, CONSIDERATION O[~ COMPREHENSryF FFE SCHEDUI E -ANNUAL UPDATE Staff report pmscntrd by Jim Harr, Administratlve Services D'vamr. Mayor Smm nprned the mccung for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was cbscd. City Council Minutes August 5, 1992 Page 6 RESOLUTION N0.92-223 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NOS. 9(M49, 91-144, 91-194-A, 91-194-B, AND ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTTON DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTM¢NT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Stout tr, approve Resolution No. 92-223. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. er~~.: G1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATI NS AND PERMIT REOCnRFMENTS FOR TAXICAB SERVICE Staft report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Councilmember Buquet sated he felt $I,000,f100.00 was a little tow (or Ute liability amowt and felt it should remain as is. Mayor Stout opened the mceting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Robert Brady, Classic Cab Company, feh the proposed exemptions would not be a good idea for Ute City. He felt each driver should have Ihe'u own permit to drive in Rancho Cucamonga, Du:me Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. added that in Ne (ee Resolution the Cily Council just approved it would cost each driver S 124.00 to get Neir own permit to drive a cab in Rancho Cucamonga. He stated it was less expensive to renew because you would not have m do the ~ckgrowd checks, fingerprints and photographs a saond time. Councilmember Wright asked if other cities' regulations wham cab companies arc licensed are as restrictive as Rancho Ctacamonga's as it mlates to individual drivers. Duane Raker, Assismnt to the Cily Manager, stated as far as he knew ocher cities had Ute background checks and }lolice checks on the drivers,bat did cwt know i(they did ezacdy ac Rancho Cucamonga dots, Gene Slatings, President of Yellow Cab Company and a resident of the Cily, stated h. did not agree with Mr. Rrady's comments. He also mentionrd that he had disuilwtcd additional intormaton for Duane Baker to mview which had not been shared with the City Council He felt the liability insurance was very high and would probably cost him alwut $A,000.Op per year, per driver and asked that Utc Council lower Ne ammmt Io $1,000, 000.00 as Uuane Baker had suggested There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. lames Markman, City Attorney, stated he disagreed with Mr. Slalings' commen~s nn the ami-trust exposure information given to Duane Baker. He continued to comment on this matter. He stated what this Ordinance is trying to do is promet the public, so that ate cab ddvers arc checked out be(om they can drive in Rarrcho Cucamonga. City Council Minutes August S, 1992 Page 7 Councilmembrr Wright stated she felt if Ne goal of Ne City is m protect Ne residents by adopting Nis ONinar¢e, she stated she felt uncomfortable adopdng something whue in pan Rancho Cucamonga would be relying on what other cities have done m check Ne drivers. She wanted N know Nat they am checked out in Ne same ways in othu cities that Rancho Cucamonga would be doing this. She akked if there was a way to azsure Nis. lames Markman, City Attorney, felt Ne City Council should go ahead wiN Nis arM for Duane Baker to do some more checking wiN oNu cities and possibly modify Nis OMirmnce if needed at a later date. He staled he felt Nis Ordinance would be very similar to other cities. Councilmember Wright asked That Ne in(ortnation come back ar the second trading of Nis Odinance, Cnuncilmembu Buquet felt Ne highs instrrance rare was still necessary in order m prtxat the City. Councilmember Aleunder stated he was not comfortable going forward wiN the Ordinance tonight because of all Ne questions mired. Councilmember Williams stated she is also concerned wiN Ne exemption section of the ordinance. The Council contorted that They wanted to make Sure orhu cities are as thorough and restrictive as Ranclm Cucamonga is regarding dre drivers. ORDRNANCE NO.501 (lust reading) AN ORDNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING ANEW CHAPTER 8.30 ENTITLED'TAXICAB SERVICE," THEREIN REGIJLATMG AND PERMITTING THE OPERATTON OF TAXIS MOTION: Moved by Stout, saonded by W illiams m re-open dre public hearing and contlnue it N August l9, 1992 Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. .rt~r~ G2. CONSIDERATION TO 4DOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION IO 52020 PERTAINING TO LIMITED TIME PARKING ZONES TO PROVIDE FOR THF. PLACEMENT OF SIGNS TO D FINE nN S A AN OPTION TO PAINTIN .~ Staff report presented 6y Jac O'Neil, City Lngincex, Mayor Smut opened the meeting for public hearing. Thee being no response, Ne public hearing was closed. Councilmember Buquc(mentioned he philosophically had questions reganling Nis. Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk, road the dtlc of Ordinance No. 39-D. ORDINANCE N0.39-D (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CfTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIiCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENP(NG SECTION 10.52.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING LIMITED TIME PARKING ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS City Council Minutes August 5, 1992 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to waive toll reading and set secontl reading for August 19, 1992, Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. rrr•rr H. CITY MANAGEk'S STAFF RF.PORTR klt. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTION OF A REPLACEMENT FOR THE YOUTH ASSISTANCE $UeCOMMTITEF. Stiff rolwrt presented by Paula Pachon,. ACTION: Council concurred that Councilmembers Alexander and Wright would serve on flee Youth Assistance Subcomminee. rrrrrr 11. ~gjJCID RATION TO D S( .NA A VOTIN . PR NTATI AND AN I NA FOR Trig t EA 1F OP t.IFORNIA ITIF.c A tAi. MEET(N Staff report presented by lack Lam, City Manager. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout w appoint Williams es the vodng mpmsentative and Baguet as dtC alternate. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. rrr.r• 12. REVIEW OF REPORT AND RECOMMKNDATtONC R ARDIN . TH D IVERY OF llEVEIA]PMENT RELATED SFRVICEC Stiff report ptcscnted 6y Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager. Mayor Stout smlcd he felt the roport shwld be appmved and all forwarded suggcsdons implemented, altlwugh he felt it was very hard m follow allot Ne suggestlons due m budgetary constraints. Mayor Stout complimented the people chat worked on Nis. Councilmember Wrightalso agreed. Councilmcmber Buquet also felt it was very innovative as suggested. Fmnk Williams, BIA, felt this was a very good fast uep and staled the BIA appreciated what stiff is doing to better the procass. Kent Crowley, Chamber of Commerce, thanked the Cily for allowing the Chamber m be part of this and fell the scoff was wondgful. MOTION: Moved by Stout, saondal by Alezander m accept the rt~rt. Motion rartied unanimously, 5-0. •rrrrr d. jDF.NTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR N.XT MRRT[NO 11. Councilmember W i!liams asked that an update on the Library Master Plan come bxk on the next agenda. City CouncB Minutes Augua 5, 1992 Page 9 •rr».. K 1. Frank Williams, BIA, asked if the items he had previously brought uP would be on the nett agenda. Councilmember Buquet staled he wanted staff W investigate this aM then came back ra the Counctl at a later date. rr~~~• MOTION: Movcd by Williams, seconded by Alexander m adjount m Executive Session to dixuss pcrsonnel mat',ers. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m. Reslxcdully submitted, Ikbre 7. Ad®na, CMC City Clerk Appovcd: 2 u :NP C Jfn vm ONa oao o N o 00 nm aOnnNnoaOPNOinON o0a0anaaeOrOO NOOOm Namam Oan NNOOn nOP N N m<na0a oNmmanNN n•Yn .~ Jp ndm naNa>mP O.yNn•NahpPOnNmaN plldNd PPP NNNNmnnmm~ OOi.OiyN~HnYi~w.mi n.Yi n.Yi P P000 OOOOOOOac00 eoaaadn)nnhnnnFhnNhnnhnFnnFFnnnn~h Nl.nnhnMMhnM1FFwnnMn \• \• O;x 1 v < •• m v • •1• i wa oa V FVO Oa PLL LLaNamNF I\ \NOh mVmNM OI mm~ F iSa I V N2W POfOmNa V O Pm •i N\vZ ONO•a C1~ ~ < OO NY ppv • N m0 nL yh rOJ w\n V vwVVW u f i OvW\¢ ~ JJ J J h¢ hi NS Jhv J'J JJ)~J 1 JJ VO JO ¢L ww ; v wJw y ~NY VV p w ¢¢ Fih eLL .z. a20 1 wn m __ WLL <p0 V_ ONmlvw~Nhv GV O i NOWW<N v2NhNLLw LL2WLLN SFh< \N nZOhOO~h00 N OSNw220 uVVNV 2 2 S ii NhY hiYhO Y NZJ<L< J6f2UJN¢W ZpJN>NZ<SZY O ISN~[w YLiW<~J¢e ¢O 00 WIWW)fW ¢ J vv •ZZVLL iFOhOhi iiN LW .u JfOOi LJVf4V<00<J sozru Qo~zs i<s\wwsnN¢s •wn LVO YJ'JS> vJ• J 2 Zm <LSUN FJZiWYfSLLW W2 •'J>LJOWW>Wf )e a ¢ ¢ rr >iw~Ol¢va)NrtD¢O{FHOVUJO<¢Y¢f0)OOY)OV :o ZN u\~ F >S OOW Z r ~- <w sSi JLZ ..~W,t.y. J Z r NV vS •UT w OSO 2 hx i O O Sh Z 2 )OJ S Y i m I mi NZ Sy NI iON Zv2 aZ6 MOSG¢< 2 ZhS OOf JVN u fie ii»~N a W ~iN 'i i~ yi Ni: o>e a • Ltv On vV` 2 OVVN NONOtwh<VOOr<w W2Z hSN J• <h<! Own IINU VOOYW~ '' `~ eil:ii ui~cJ <o Lz°`oYii i'oj ¢eh O vOZ ¢OZNF6 JL~SZ NfNZZ O¢O 2 Ov J< 'Jy WOW pFW NOU<vOV~ S Lw W O ROOOO v fV2 WOOSVNNFJ¢SOJhhN •hG2G ry~wWmzNhr°.ipi ia~NhiN)e¢zzNZnIh VVJJNO yh xa 1 myJ N » <• JOOOOf<1wiM00000v OSL m Z d OU 1f 1f<f<!<<00000001OOOmpOVVVVVVVVVVUy VV000 nd NOy P maNPman O!P hON a of oaN NoomaaNnn nhNa eae aae nnNOm are F n p n N F hNn NThn~ nNHM hFnmr > h)hNFA rNFN ~¢ •L E - DmD } N a.N ~~ •DN ~. ;E oar ~,n NNPNrvrv N Nmrva ;: __ rn _ _ n aNNN ._ NN _ N rv N :;: ~E ~PerrvN.> ir sir mfNOnmPe..Nn NanmP Ufa f n r aaaaaaannn _ oa rn in a onnn n.-nnrNnNnrn.-i-..n nnnn nn n~.nr.n~. r..n n.-n.-I.nrrl-nn~-nnnn.. ..r ;~ f mm f fm 1 m m < f N iP ONN ~ S G\N \ i ti i U \\ m rP wiN S •m N\ eP Y O\ \w\\ F D p[ N¢ •\N VWnCr Z p\\ ~1f v N ~ w\ O 6NYN M IN r r \1\ Z • K mm m V tl Y41m m O J ~\ f a i U 'a V > l ea N I'1 VSO D Z VGW VWrnVV •r i _ r f Nl iNGN Oa \ NjONp< Yrv SIP m u ON~ O• OJ [\ J M J l Z Vr \ r T ~ V¢ ¢Z _ 11< „• IVI Z <I I _ Ows O\• m ~ __ V M1WVVNO SJVn 37~ ' ¢WLL,¢¢oFV V_TM1P O JSJ M1 ~ J a V •2• m`J .~rf WJVf m JwrOffJ1U rv7• OI fV ¢ O V2 Y2 ~wrtl- www d tl ZWV<62NG ¢M1n rx If ii ` tl r H aoN ~~irDwr l w e tl W I lr a ~ o JN SN<2 N VSLLOOOSSfNW [rZ inJWr6 Or ¢• WOO N2rSNf2MLrf Zxf J NO N ¢Or\ aYwiOVV f13/2fm Z20 TJJTVS Wmw406i JO~O C .ii <iirr iWla ¢[n NJiIY ~~soii iii'. ~oo~ ovaimu f < ~ ow .. i i ~ar.r.~irm°i w rt ¢W ¢. i . i Mi¢ uu .oi¢ V a ¢ n [ t[ r¢¢ rOJiSO rair i u I7: ii suin ~Z w• JNw rLWWw n1L >J¢>w>> wOYI PLLr i< fiM1 riOf JrYf YJILL WZO<J<VJJWVRf J>J IDDYO¢ip¢r2y00V¢¢<NNtl P¢NnVGO¢¢6Tmr>N>Op FinNwN¢LLN¢IO • J • Vw ¢ YS i ` i ° ¢ r tl u~ ~riu of .. ¢ ozn i Y z on ¢LNWVU .+ M¢ p ZV N • fSW fJnJ r> NJ i OJ O NOTi2F ¢JJ U OL ZVrO ~ • <VOWOn ¢Ow TiyZ ~- ¢Zi r Oim <2~ n0f fS ¢ <SOW ZDZ DVi Jiiw wZ ZpJWrJ>D Vwtlmf Or Y i l i[ JJ fi i ^ [ w VOO 'lN iT• Yx O>V i 1 SFnJf JJLLr JZY •Z23 >iJWfWU•N~ 2 LL ~• wDr fYNrOJ• fVVOW NNf IFf21DW MN Z~Sn W• riN NV¢fLZ tlOnW OSW VmWJLSSOwwi ~ONOV rJ0 NOS Om04VVNii NNS Of •J U~[SrN •[• Sn IOOT1r ¢ZJJNwOOLWOZ Jpnw2tVtlY nJ<J[SN 0000¢¢1J0 r7<f rOOV'J>SNfpOlfff Ni09fw •S• OOOOWWwWWWUULLULLULLV VOf V' u'VSSIiiZi2LZZMr 1l'l lY U~[rYUYfJJ •¢ ~fN N.•m NaNNNNPm NIiP •O •IN rammOhin NNNNrN• •• f ~S• ~ nN rwMV PrPPrvnPnPPP mfTmNNf NarOm nPPPrrnmN rP P NNPP.w Pr~1 wP P • • n eom ni e ii: n eam eary r~iA oim n yam v° n: i .~ o PNN • m .. r ,.~ n w P r r r ,., ,.~ ~., ., N N N .. rv J ^ Y vi ~ z a• ~o NawmPmrnmaN NarmPO NawmPerrv oeoooeeeeeeeeeooooo0 Y u •m • < • • <¢ Y < O i \ V Or P~ • • NO nA'INWfw Am\ O a\Y V m S >Y <m rr• OYm j yrwp~WLa¢ S ZN ~ w 1 I bw rru W6W06 a\Z4s r¢ \UI o~¢ sosol m r < LJ>m¢ aNny VONIm J ~ 1 wlr n rI NL ~ J ¢1 P\ IIiJI IN ~ Wli 20< ~ m Pwo> OOVr~• ¢JW<r Z uV Zln JVJVw SW20ZP N m up ZN _ _Y<W f• Iw ¢\'J¢ wN<F¢ < - < ¢ N JZVNIU 20 IONI • V• LLOS Z ONwuw OJZS 0[ip PJU¢ ON ¢ N YO YJrV Wlr i3 OVWO I wN O¢ J tZFN2r u'u00 C\IZ 4Vt jJ6VSVLLJJ S ? mVj J~rS J2rVJw VN w2rw4- 20 i uP LVr w V >mWZ pio V= u NI 4J wOr GO¢ UV¢ ¢ n u O¢ ZSWV pJN __ ¢2 __ U G~Jm 12001¢ ri ~[ ) pJw t M\w ~+JPW uZSif NSLLw wOww~ iJP¢ rOY) 7pJ<Y) n0> WJJJZ O 4Z N~ }pOmOU6irNOJi0Y6J4u< Nu iy PU6NiiN'fmu¢OPmppO¢¢N¢ PVi V V i Y • O F L w Z ^\w U Z L J L Z V ni J J 2 J w 2 <Jw Vu VI •Vwwz2 J JZu R O wFw P<¢ JL n m <~e¢U JLN wJV« WrOW OWOwWrY spa) V'^ • ¢ Y p • P Z• F V\ < m ONE O Ni Nip4rLLi0u<ZZ J20• •NSrf Yi ~OSwWUNN` <7 •w~• • YfJN YO Zrw JOw¢pWrwI60J006 RCFhW¢¢ <NYWJJm V S •i J2VUZ r6¢Jn ¢}OSrrw WZVO P NJ'Zw ~2p6J¢6JUV¢mwJ upYiip ZS _f Y Y ___ fVVWWpOO > > ___N}w WO¢ 6pY< •S• _ _ _ _ _ JJZi i i ZiZZiZiCit Y OOY6G¢p000P¢R6¢¢6¢NNN • • ¢• NP• NaPOryNPnNrPOwOmaP AaNaO nNa MNa P O• NInNIm I O •Z• N PNZNNrNNNPN OeNOmN PFlrPPPPrvn(~ P NrvNPryPI~r1P PrN•1n Pn mm~pN mf m~mN ON mnNr 3 rl Jlrv Sl ., i -.i i mrf ~: Wi zi aJi •o ii ri ii •. :L. •i• 1l m aom e Na mrr .iie ~dn .. n ~i°or nr. m..n4 r ~. .. a J ..NmrNahmahmPO mrNa.m Nonmm ryHNN aaaaryaMaaw~ aooooooeooeoecooooo =huh h.-~..FF..FFr-FF Fr-n,-.-r-nrr-FF.-FF.-«F..~.F.. .. .-~.-F,- ", r . P W u u r : i Wr N l~ • u - I N ° m • F J NVN i IFWmO ~. PPh~fia> PF wJ \ POPi mii Y..V n10J ~ma uzew o.'. >o neJr in ~z~ .wo«a uL.os> w\s \JViVO• li \J tiJ.Vi FhmFV.Vi N9.. it\6war4 wI7M1N ¢i WJTJJ •2JWSf JVW O 4ZO .V.\O iiOJ JY• n JOO •SN f60• 6FWJm«VN2~ZNZ o2CJ 00 >LWV4040VmOw r:l. iimmomiaWf °oozez OifiiLLiW ..LL Omwr UrY2LLf J\i O4 OnNOU .YI Np0 fpWf rZ NZV aP ZbN >YVm ~O41rZawoGhVNOWZV bimiN i'u ~zw pnLL~ az o..rr zmlW4J nOYLL ..JwJ OW ppwu NLG wSNSiYWi4Nn OZf LSOLN Zi m~4 OVJfi f0• p6w60CV O NY02 432h~rr ~.Oi ¢VNm2JRUZ wJ» w1UJi JNSN OwwJ wOJ}yjj~ TVaOJNOYJN>J W>wwJwJy •N630VOO aNJNU06NOiVOYmeVOrY4YOVLLPUROG66rUV J = O V_ Y_ U •Z S .. n V i / S V V l yJ t0 Yi ib YO al IiSJ V V aJ 4 r~ON 2 wLL i O IN _ _ 4 WVG 62 l O Zb ~ O mVUS YO Ou 2 V 4 ttVFi rOR 4Z JV V VJZPZZJNS h 1... JJr rJr •SLVib VLw OJJ /lC w00 •ZV ZW fVl4V.[VN lJ JfJ wVwwu JS •i +Z• w0 t0 w0 w20 VZOVi2w VJ• fJ261 LLwWil JW JV_Jll IS .GRWibS..OV W JY6~N l2VlZiiw .SWfm wf>SU0 WNwalOw wwwOOU uOwhOZi6iWJWrJW2N4JZ rJ4Vr? Ji 004 hJJO• wSam .iGf WLZ40f NNNNNNNN NNMNNNNNbbYrhYbbJJJ» >1Z>i1>Z32444 wIP OmNNa mOmnrNTaaOmh 000 mmP h„^.N.~no v.PO emo Noe~iN earu:ooe n mNx mN q Nmmmmme.~NPmmmm mmwiNmN fOTmNNmN 4 S w :NP ~~O Sf Su0 O~+ •~• isi i io• .Z• ~v• ~) ~2~ O: tv i• F~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z~ ~i~ OP000 POONnpippOOOrv o~oFOmrron a-0oa Nri o4.ef rvo• rv . + N Peie °o 'ci rv p rP rrv;^ m eNN N r mn N n N N ~•rvwNwNwww~ _ nNmNp PpmNm. m•Nah PPmO OOOOmO PPN NNN ~m Tr niiln Amn~nlnm PPO 00000000 OOOOOOOOOOpop0000 00000 OOaafahr~hhhhnNmhnhnmm~hhhhnhnnhhmhhhnNhnnhNhhnhhnM1nh 1 Y 1 < 1 L Y \ L < Y V w^ m P n n •I4 nw p S V Wm Z O <M1 pP 1 ~ NV pP 'J •Z li • VO OW~L02h ~1 01 YO IIW wi WO '>J LO 2 <OPO h0 OON \ OS nmm\ hp Y SLi O aN00 VO 00J •Ov vY.v 1~\wVL'J 4 iNnN IR Pfw \ mwi•w i_ a0 O_ WPm• JO Yvi P VF 00 V\V .+N O 2NLnN Fi NN• ON•WLniv S mVWViV LV WiWrPOwOZJV 22 f O JN i NOON O.n NN 4070 JO 4 wi tW{VWOf Ni Z\ nVw V'o V yyJZWNJ > JJOiP J V Zi Vi2nLWV~JV VUO OWLLi2if NM1V 4<Wi f04 niLVVO•'J4 O O ILJ ZL WVSJ tVlJif JJL20 4JmSVf SSWrZ J v J Wi WJNNeWJWiNJW• fiwt N i0i nONnJiJnM1in 'J FV) » L<LSLVwrWf u ~{ ZVWOLWLZSV2NVSOL22N LLNL 4540 fZLLS V W <fiYW ZW nV wJ rLZ V W J L4 r ~S=J~ nfi2<61 WWV6J~Lf NfiNrN V Z ~ it m L ttWJW1+t> W 4i rp4iyJ ir+ .. V O W~•I hNNNwJ ILZ wZVri7WO4 puw 4VLf 1 u I ~~N y00NSO7. JL10M1Z JllO i2in fnZiJZf4WJ`N4L 40n VFZ OOLVN SvWNwrLL JhOr.NWVWSFiU rV4 O J9 vivvhvNnVeir ZNM1iSi rJZNO p r i iW~m`j i ILW•LVZO » :inf .wiWwwNiJVOJ O p ii0 wl f~fIWYWW4fWJ<\f rfMw WOw00 > > a O vwp aWJ<VVL » N>O4pVL>VlmL~y>iN6eNaNNJw>OJNJ A i p~vf O n C • S hhf Wi. V > v NS f0 VOV J f h Wf FSW OZ NV) ~+u • i°' 40 eou i i r wi s o J W N o e.J4 iLNnip i z J o ~i4 ii~Hesizvs i .uW .zu inwS 44 Lr.ipef r 6 r+V_f_ VU_OSO tJ f I` hYWZiJv 6 J NfrV I~VV S 60p•iN22w J M1 Lf v L6f SVF W OvVWW np 2 tN S fiZY OZV GOON LN ~VU r •i OfN e N4N i ~•i N'~nanysf ~~i l FJO SVni LWV v n0 nVJ vfNNJNVJ ~O OfO 4 42L1 UL JvYJV vOM1F Npn•vNVV V64 YOrw O Z _O )O wOv •Zi1fOS~ JiZivrJNNLeOiYLi JOZ vZ V n • LNO )O Wf..00 r6fONWWVf OMYp4fw O ~w WfNyJN14)pLLLLLW fOv ~ tl S~~ WJr NVOOhOVy..J v Z/ VMnnM~WWf V4v 00 JpOhJJfOeNhf)N>ie•JVOVLJ J 4vSVM1ffOJ VVJJ4 i37) n0004J ••1• f•fW2MJ000 w [ G NVO ft<fff•4••ff000pO00000VVVVVVUVVVVVVVVVJ • n fNm0.4•fmOnln ON.-n h-0ON OTT-0v h nOm NPNT 4fP0~0-0hh-0•• NCO PNNO• O N ON i ;; OdN PaNee1 ooNeeNeoN ' °NN~ a ° °e P a ° M ° ° o° ° ~ noeo ee . . v 1 a ~° e o • ~ n o e o or o P NNNO? •aP0• . IaN naa rPf N pN mN n n n n n rm nn ~ n NON n V N n n n w n n N i; • ~i tl _ ' • mIN 6PO n~~lppNan'OPOnNmIN 6POn Om mfnn l ~iT~Fnr~ Y~ i rl OOppO OOOOpOOppp 000000000 OM1FFnnnnnnnFnnnnhrFnFFrrr r~rrrrr rl•rrrNnrnNrrrhnrnrNl• /i U O O V • O n OP N a ii ° Oo ,s i•N. im NN is A f r \ Jlr l 11 a I4 ml yll 2 • ~ VV _ ONmaa NOO i ~•2 TOIr mOrO oar nJOrM OP1J4 \• m O m m i\ OONFO .ley OOV n\m0 IN NPNIPr N41•MNOi wTN42 F rl VSN I mOOU m iOVbO w0 WiN 1 W i ONmZ Sim i~ Of0 ~ NJ FNNw »NNm 40NJn NN ~OtlNrUNNUfN Om i P N WOrf yWw ~/ JLL\~ N m1 WNI J=JUV IJJ:yymJ°wJiwVl NJJ LLF !N Z IIVV i J 2 VV iiVVrJVOiiVU\VUrnJnZ V ZF O JPJ b NJ7 SLLO f 00 /r i4uOP uJJNU J JJOIJ 4JJCiSJJWbJbrrJf FJJ bbf JJN JW OJJrWWJJN9JiiSJ4wJJ rONei _ wZJWrtW N09rfbOOm JJOi 01 mOOmrrOJJMOrWWOWOJObyNOrN LNWV NVW LLILOnLLi ibLLFSiW 4LLi LLJi hmai bi} i eo® - Inw 4 r:M rioffW F~ :e: zzm.fiYi ww~~rrszoyz..bbwy rz:u rube N N i ~ i Oi\ O MOim i ii•Ir JSr+n4m V OY r0 r Of u NNJSSWm rWwNSSmOSJP0220 220wI,iiS0022Vm u Vn N°Yi1WWNILWVNn W W WSI•wNwWW ZWW rf2i w _ •i 7w rr•fVril M1IiN irl i iJSi\FrifwiiW6ibJr if Wirrmrmi0 WLir nJ4r WZ• frZf ON40wIffJirWlJr• WW4 ~jwwf OVr W •~+ a06nw1000ntbOilnN6w46V46aPrbbY .a}666i6mNN66NbbNWSN6N / i ~ V 2 = w i W i i O r =O r ° o mN i o o i y w u .. u i° ~ N z o 4 V O i• Z r V u w NOr+ JfW !i• M 2 bfn O4J w2 O Vrr OW _ WJVW ti _ y _ u a 4iYni J+J ii n fn O tWJ WiiON ° nIOLL C Voilw iueo o~ ii . / pwf lr irr rY ooi f~i i eo m W : r i r No 4os pro ° •rwi Wzu ui s z . i m i~ a~ I • pz °oiJ mu z . iW ib rUOJIJ •S Vf rOOr• OSI!•[J'.+FJ SN NVfb 4 Y / • ISifSON• 4 flbtlW } Vi Srr 2O Of YfiJ i6 O4WJ _ }OlifF~\ t tl w ~i° ZN O N Or m N LLV •w1 It1 Nn2 u O[4JO OY4Jr N tlMJtltlO b r JWSi urON 4yJO2J2W WpW4iJN}iFewt]rrSfOr rIi SOSV If1 06771 wO4 Yf JLLi NJOOOi6pf iff00000rVSZ{W[SOffff Ii1 VVVV0000000pwwwWLL4LL4.LLV'JNVyZYiiiZLZLLMVrnnni~[JJJJJJJ ~ ~ FNra~Pln dNP• l N PI nma OdFn •IPNIN PIN nOmnPmNN ryryi nn NOnm Npm m n n N N n •L/ NmmFN n nn ~ nr PrynNnPn n r N P N ? PnN mPP • / .<+ `~ z o ry u O 1, SI iu +e ooe !Pm O r, m NN n•~nnm P n rrrNONN q N •Z• N O 2 • ;S: JOra OO~~u NOFePOr NOn.q Onrnrrrnnnnrnnnnrnrrr00'Fe^oOFOOnnww000000wOwwwOOOnn •Z n n n w nnr • W a ¢ q q tl •• i • tl ie i'i iiz .r. n ~ a > tl '• ~ e° e r r omH ~~~°wa°n N ° .. J z f f u °o .Yla r po z 1 z ~ ,.~ i i o tl~W: ~ < ii '^ i ~a ^^+o mr 'e Vei=Ne N' •ii aN: _< ,J, NW wou LL.Ji N iw~: LLa:.J. rWN~oq i" .. of W~ N J`JNJSNJnJ JO' gIW6 n C~ tl ZJ • VVN J r`j: Q Wmtl~ •pn i0 u+Nr?6s? JjV r SO• VNtJNOnY OOI ~S • JnJO'RRJSJ Ny O jiU JO<N~<OZn N<ONJwN >~• WN6fZ VI 00 Zp'P WOIw _ LL~JNtlLLhLLi~tYW <IL Jq p• p OH Nn ••~ ~ 1 n O 10 Y •+JN• fiJWtlOOY~ +YNLLpONi30ji VZ u Z YOUnW66j0 n tl y pW yu ;~ r rn O" ^~ O PnIpON w r ry wLL _I I 1 I~il n LLW OWl1 i LF •Q OUZr •N ni! ii OI=i zLLLW ~ Jip JOp tlOVWWJ~>O tl{-wiJOp'O N NZ Nv w Wotl?VN`rW JVYZ ¢ O Y nZyO•[S'rp6fnlNwVYWN mWlrwJ<rtiiYln¢ • ti n uir rJLLNLLFI q01 jtrNirSVmrOWOrVr OYZJY JVI W^Wl<wNrN•.aZ!`O~NOjMfq •~• f~> wZOwN?~tlY~ry••: Np W JYZ JOW O Mr YLLr r• • p 01xTnnnNNVr NR rN O P06p NU6ntOi fONiN tlt 7 l ji O n 'J N i OVVW Z O JVJV a • W e S< pWViVT V .J. N tltl sas ~ y: N .po c<ar~ • jw n e•piZ V V N 6N NW _ FS ^ '~ S JO i JV OWZ ZO • • + J r !V V WJ ziZ 6 • • nrNJ 2 O1wN02 <VS;W SW frnrW V i JO Wiw • • vrw u Ort ~ _J:jiiV ~i> p'40n1n O:L;j.Wi! • • ONSV uiWJNWO'T 7<1YVYF JigVNJ 'fF T6gJJ??JO WOO • • J !w nV co_ N V iOJ •iO JfJ tlwW • • i~n~liiv •WN V.np ffNZyJJINJV2YQSaJir7VNYVVViLr •NN JrOi • • OJIpJV JZ wS jWW J •pJWw W O< i0__00_00_NjjW Nru OJi ! J OO <J'~O •wyppJra< wWFOOiO< SWYW Z ~ OC 60• jVWW •r O\J<VijO V_V_V_V_V_JVp OWON •i• u •Z•;nrt! Vf0]JrtnrSOFVOnI iV>JiO V••Jijrr7 O<NOOT •!• < • !<V_Jrvn000~ ln~Jjil •!<WWSn:=OptlOV « <!llWW2nnga •Z• zzL[ziz [ ti zi pp000papaapa •aaspttlgO;atlYigso- • • a• nN1000+nPr P<}.n .i Q1,OmmNOr •O• N+O a rvOmOPryPOPI~•r 1.m••O+rv^NO •Z1 PmP NNmNPn m •O > nP~nnP NPmmm~Twn O N rv 101TOn< •W• ~ NNn Nn E / •.• nrvONO~nOOrnmm~ No00o+00a000000an+TOwmNTO0o0o OP rv NaTn.- NaeoanTe• ea NimN NPm00• NPNa ~P ~OO+ Nah11 P+ONN w .. n n n NN I •2• m w/ r J~ A Nar rNTIN POn j+i Oda llaihN111'1~ ~mI 000000 000000 00000 ONFnrnnnhhnnrr nnhNMh.•nNn.~NNNNwNFr~rl•hhrrnnnNNr x/ • .L ~ V • m NV s ___ • m i m m V i xw u rm u x m ~ u ~ o r N s i i 1 • N {- 2 p u z. J o P l ~hh OW W IWF TOO Z v V u O hZY INPJ J VO Op0 O oe mK m ' n Pemma s z NP + ~°` ..iW- H W i PnsL ee ~ z o iN w ~ -i~ r n i v i e i is j tl WN w Woe Npm + i /io uw ` ~' h ~ ~`" h ~: i~: ruuN~s a oti- i ii ~ reiW w n n .+. rte.= ii Pi.Wih NOOiiii J P h ) n • if { (J( 40J JV JN NU < _ eir.• yN?W l i 1•. j ~ ~ eZw NJ• pY TIY06hJ W» >T I •• /S/ F V + I nJ6000 ONNNMO •x.n nVSN vtl o e0 JN Za FS ^ PWW. TIOIZO• ZmWJ20pNll~lnOm\ rIU O iOmJmNNh< ~ m {W w(O N i.<IN\O ie J JIxJ O L((( JpL p0~ O •U xY.Oppp60m NO• hOwOpVJi tiN.O ZI NI\ +WZSWi Ov wV ZOmW 0(O rVmrepmmmmOOW\+O NOWO <R w O 0 <N~+O06 Ix (LiWr POOOpF ONIOmNtlLL O VO m(0 .[J hW Jopl h NI wJVrn w m V u WUmm n OwUY>V• JJ6 . m6<JJJJ Y V a. NI¢ p o V.+eCte 06in N<w O On Jx N /(/ i ~Z.f Mh nTnhrOJ hhNFVWh V wJpVpN_ pONJ (pmJJmp6__ .60JFpiJmO<II.W N mp ~+/ li6\ ~eN.Zi J W <{Nr( Op ~Nmo rl •xiJPmr (y NnVNVFp Fp(m70LLh6VYOrNNr.. Z V ~ J O J / Z O N S 4 6 .• Jr LLi N :a i i i {u Irii N Iv zi i.vv uz N . : rJ J ~z~ s ho s a n O F Ot YO Y r r / J'O OtlN n0 26 0 V.. OJ O O Vp rW Q • Pr V ZV wUV Sp iV0• LLO /~ .ZV Rir iN Or U.[J 1 wxWV .Urr <xr P OZ FO ( Oh OV Srv r t paw r rNmzH osW ou •.a rc •+n OYW. DmJh 2iOV - ~ 7NVw {iY WOS .iJ 062 O<NZU FtawUV w < ~ i. ~ s W ~ ~ . . wji u i w<ooJp< wum ms I~I .. r O2iwil W Ni tJpl N JJ v¢J N1• J J OtWLIW• iVtFx •<VZ i~fSJHl~N p • h.Ww( i•x Yom( fJ IlOlm JJ nW •0 •. I 1 JW hmO SO J T y SJZ~ .wiOr p0( Zi p mO VO w/ /i/ J J uLL227.L.(r' ~i i VVV I IW VJm V wOpp )(6NS « p'N NNN~ Op s i N J~ </ ..i<mu w w Pe .oJ <WZroYm . . . •21 mNNV~NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNhrnhhh.-r'Mh9J)llll)li)VM . NanJnaNaJe mTTeTmnm.tlPn+Ptl .o. oo~ .-aon mi11 ePN me- eJ n JT /IPPipm+n N OOwm On /2/ nNT nnm- Nr~ n rv n nT nNT m Tw Nn 00 / l ~ 1.1 !~. =^aY ..ram r. ~: ~o_£ S 3 '~ ''. ~'&:: f ~ ~ . E ~ _~~ _ _ _ a ma^ ~ _ ~ . 6C ~ L~sFB '2 Y _ C .. a p c]::Y E .~o .x yEfE YE ~ "9 ,. _ 3.. ' ~ =a d .. _< .. 8f. ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~^~. ~ i s fS ;~~a si ' P~'~CRo !~ .. ~ 6..25 ~~E~ '~ z i ~: ° ~' ..1 y E s ~ N E ` 2 a,\ x ~ 9R I_ :5 ~~tl'~FP'A~S$3~88 m $ '~1a^ m K ~ ~ ., ~~. .. .... .~ ms.. e s $?=aag$$gxaRx as $ $$~# 5 ?~I uy"', X88%888888888 R, ?8 4 % =8%° < 4~~ - E ~~88 g'~~~335~ 3 G.9~ 'R ~ ^.~'.g S - m', a ~, 4'',, .°.e%8RA%E34i4 R88 A a 8% etlSm ~ p % F: yF ~g Y.~ >3.~~Ra ~. ~. ~.~.~~RY. ~_ ~ ::.",8~ 8 ~ 8, X _ - - - - 'I X Y~^ »I A88%%%888888E : 9 ~ S9ew ~ R = ~_" g~j 8' 3Aa"' 3 L ~aR~ - .._''~ 3S~~eee5» ;S~ a eoo° ~ e {~ w ~ K»»4wwwwvwywyy q ~i~ ~ Y» »»»YYxY:Y ~ ~~ -w ~'' ~3~,°°.3~Po 63a~49~ 5 ~g~ _Y ~iiXe ~ ~Y qY ,.~ Y y Y ~ ~ y ~ ~ 3°sR c~aa~a~3 x$~ n, $R~3A ~'g ~~ 3 i ID r s. ' r -', s e fix. , a~ _ Y' a ~_^ S't .. y_w €c. ~y'_ Y R :P 7~ a° a' RR $° R fib 8R :x sR - 4R 4 ¢" ^RC it Yfi Y ." - Ym Yom' V _ _ sa ~._ _ 3E : _ P q ~. h ~'':ai °s 5i %z'' % YY Gp '~ ~ .-X~ t gS~ o Y +~ '• .., . .. j Y Y Y g £ ;. Sf N ~ !. ~ p ... x Y..a ~s Y Y E X 8 SA RR' ° R ~` q~', eR', y =~ s a r a 3' 3' ~' s if .:P R~ .. V 1P _ i ffi v e ' sJ RL. C°F, 3: ^e £2 5£h v r ~~ _`z- ~ Ya_a ' k~ y ° ~ Y~SA SS %:_ k 2. _ N a' a w s ~ ~J ~ 5 a Y~:~° s o 5 d - ~ ~ G I ~ ~~ COPYa_..r.M~..w...w,.. .~......~.~.~..~.___~ __ IW LLCgIp10 ffVQAOE ISEDlfE131 I. TYpF(5) CF IICEN5E151 _ . --. FIEE NO. Ie: 0.pmlmml al Akohdk lenrap Camrd roll Erpodnoy Sanornnn 9581e '''n •i' A^` 'Di Cd'd ?1-OEf Fpl^ l RECEIpl N0. ~ L +.,. . . ,.,.. ?±ivoislde ihr and +roaed Mnb a l I v r- .. .. GFOOEA%IICAt COQ ~(1' y pp re< « fwnn<dnnbed ae bSa.p 0.n 1[wed }. NAMEI51 Of AERICAM(SI hmp, Iermil RI,CiLR t'~PR ^n'rnn•.v App3ed o^d^3«. z10M ^ FflMiw Daler_ Efle<Sro Dan 3. TY9E151 OF TRANSACTON(5) . FEE lK. ttfE __ '+I1i1.1 ', not: 'r.t. y.. ~,<n- 3 ,t BPU CCLiOI t0 P:rson (9cc .n.a 071 ~; ll d. Nome al ead«,. ~ „(D DECEIVED ; q 3 l«aeon al emimm -Namber and sttwl CITY CLEPN „';? t. ,: in.: AUG 131992 rs~n yp ~?scode ;n la )l i.il ;aa W'~il/rrJl' lo I]I xl9lto'111 EZ^I i~i iµ 3' - a rr rr men e<enud, ). An p.e u[ I` ode SM. h«ol uww ?1-l1°f Cn lc :cnara 1. .. _~~ 9. Mon you em been <oeriaed of a lelony> 10. Mare yw a er ndond any of Poe poriuane al Me AI[aAdi< eere[o9r Control M a re9rrblian[ el Mr 0.pammm per. Ieinirrpb Me A<I? Vo9-V ]L10119 I I Eepdn o "YFS" om.er n inm[ 9 a[ 10 o ea on«hmem wM[h Mall M deemed porn d rMr opplmoean. 13. Appli[em opree[ (ol rM1el enY m ne op r employed In n. la liwnud premne[ will Aaw II the 9uali([ar m of o A[[mrr, anA coon fbl rAOr M1e .ill net .orlon w _grmil le b ridand any al IFe po._ < of Me NmAell[ Mrao9e Canhel MI_ vrzttve _ tune ter ll]1 11 STAtE J4 UUFORNIA County of ..... ........ ...... „ . .___.[bn _. ... .._____._ __. •m.~,. a ..W. r . ...M a ,..... f .., ......e. .... w ...w,._....,.......„. •.., a ,., i,,,r ....... ..:........r....... 1. , u •Appuunl ~'• ~~ SIGN dE0.E .,,,,~_ ~ ~~" .~I,i .~ .....i if I:, I,Ini'ii_. '..'lt..~ ..y.+..~:_. t't_4'n 1,ra. e_i_tl_P__n_F___ _ _ __ __ APPLICATION fY iRANfFEROR _ ____ .e__ __t .__ +•rr I3. SLAiF Of UIIFOPNIA County a( ...... ~~~'!'! :" .........Dan _. 'A.. 1. _..... eel ee ~eM'.e .r ..Mre .I rr...l..n a nn .M ne.,re .~iMa.e~. ~ ~r n ~~re..~ er ~~ ~+. m. m_emrol er n<mn _••J~ • ~~'.,• ~. ,~ aT n ~ n anDl d In._al le, u<enn Nembrrol - T __ ., ,' ., ,.. ,t ~pl3aa _-_--_ - 19. towrnn Namber acrd Shrel -~--- Ciry rnd Zip Cad<~--~--County --- Ao Nol Wnlr Mlnre Thu L(nr; For Orpanmenl Uee (hdp ------ Anp<Md~ ~ Recorded nohw, 1 ;, 1 ., Fidu<ierypawn. n ..__ __...._.. ...._ CO%ES MApFO ..:.3' ":. I: _: - nJ-re: I_ii Y evo, (~ Remroh Fw d..... ,.. Jdd a ..........................__ Olf • mr............, ...5«dp Ne. _.. ._...__ ___.. ._,,, ,,, i3 ..m Q J U z U '~^, , V /W c'1 ~ 1` i C Z J W Q U 4 _. O n n r~ ,~ m ~ y~ r r r ~ sn~m ~ ~ ~ ~ z p a 0 C D• U T O C C OJ E i~ m .~ 6 N U i[1 H C J N W L U ~] N N U00 C L N 2 M U d I(l C Z J I~ N d 4 ~OK4 V E a v 0 0 0 L L O a L c n m m v~ Z W V V L L Y N W L V N N O O~~O C O U ip ry U O L N d V ~-' a+'O O C G O r C LOOL +' N L.~-.~- L C U O O L ~ LKK nC L O O O. O R ~. 3 3 V N O O N 4- ZJJZ Y ~ L pi .. W C L L d +~ i+ V i~ O C L J N in L O O Oro N d N Z N W 3 O r` ~s 1S ~.G I ~y MIICATION fq ALCOffMK IRV9IIW IICBWIS~ 1, ttpE(5) Of IICFN5E15) fllE NO. lo, Mporlm.nl d Ak9hdk Mrnoq Can4ol I RfCEI''j, HO. WI b_ ~ f.'r .'.1-~cY Pa1C ^(!r PT~i Sw.mmwA-.. Cafd. 9ly18 . GFOGIIA9NICAL e..n i i a K CODE ]51~: v?i3 3o ZM and«.yned Am6Z applwe Ew 'l ~M lianw. deu.ib.dm loRo.c: luu.d ]. NAME151 Of APPtICAM(5) temp. Mmit " APPfied Vder Sec. 31011 A*.PIiA 3:;T1 ^_O ^At1Y ElFedi.e pme: '''" ~ Efle<L.e DOre. J. ME(sl OF iPANSACfIOfRS) fEE LIC. TYPE _ ;t. s I Dpu zR TcraoO [n Person (£CC 2GU71 ~J 11 1. N m. f Rua,pu - - s. luonoe or MUOn._Nomb.<eml Sn.N gECEIVED CITY OF gANCHO fllcaww m _ _ CITY CLEPN ^.6A0 Aoselivu lv., n'.+c - cn m.e z;p coa. co„nEr AUG 13 1992 s ~'an_h0 _ucanonc~ )1791 San i;ernardi D rorAt -_ 90631 9 Xo.. you ever Oe<n <onriNM N a lebnyi IO, Hore pu .rb violoNe anY m Me p<orivam el IM AkMWi< yero-rey. Camrd AO w reyubNom of Me Depenmenf prr~ Irc m;NrNro Me AO9 "cu ~Valovv _ I I. E.Plein a "rFS" am+e. M irom. v o. ID a o. onwnmenr .ni<n .nol~ b. a<,mea ee.r W mn eppf<ono. 14. ~AppG<o~~ opren ~fal rMr env m^eRrr .mplryeA i. omwle tiumed premun wn1 na.e all roe quolibep el a nu. e, a.a fbl rSOr Me +.II nm .idett w ceo.e r q.mn ro W .rolnmd eey el Me pa+iuoe+ of Me Akeholia breroye Coer.ol Ap ~+• 1] SIRF OF CALIFORNIA Coonry of .:?L:IIC ......... .___... Dett... `1Un^ ).tr ion] Te +rM+~ r..~ ., I/ •AiPIICANr r _,.. ._. SIGN NERE ...................____. _.......... ......... _.__ ..................... __ AP-IICATION RT TRANSFEROR IS SrAiF Of UNiORNIA Caunry d__._.. _r1re D~rC ____ _ ___ _____~N _'l l a. ]9')1 .... .. .. ...r+i.rr .R~ ri4 e. nM1^ n MrM .eei+.m~ n .M ~..nr ..+..n n.+ ^. 4 . . M. en•r ^.... • ••Mrv +r rv.nrr..+ in y~ iy ~...nn mm~.:... i.+r e. -.n[.e. er .err rn. 16. N9me(0 al 0aen.eel,1 __,.__ _-___, V $gnaM.N.I oI tksnaN.l_____,.___ _ __ 1B. tlcenu Numbal0 ___.-_ ___.__-.r-_,.___ __._-._-_-________..... _.-~__ t9. twofon N9mber and SInN Gly end Zip Code Coenry D9 NoZWd1R Brlmp Thu I,En<; Fw Depenmenl Uw pdy CMe.hed, ~Rn.,,ded nmko-. n Nduciery paP.n, n ..-....... _. _._. _... _.......... . -CONES MAIIfD...bI:;!'~.1~'%:. ~Y :iVXL. x.... .... . e.or ~7 Mmnvl.fn d. .... RNdd _-_...._....._,...-. ._ORke an.__-_. ._ _ReaNpE Ne. ...__. _.... -... .e. ,., ,.,, ~ 5 m,,.. QTRiIgYJ if lC I I I iA ZC I ZS ZL I P p 0 C p C r0 O L ~ C1 O O V ct aL ~ L C W ~n o o E 7 a • ° o L a a 2 O Z U L N p O 2 C m m of C p N W C U N A m L Y C! O L Y E C W r ~= C E C C m V W O O p U N L 4+ L N G. C a+ p N N N N O V- Y p •~ ~ [Y O O C r CI N L L W L p. U N~ V p O rE K `O L N a N p~ c L U p L L ^~ ~ C E G Pi . W 0 ~ O 0. W 2 O V J Z O O C C L L Y ~-` y V L O O V~ G i0 N N Z v1 w 3 ~ L;' Z S F ~ x W E V L J E ~ o O L O L ~ O a ~ L c~ v ~a v cv z r v z ~ ¢am v c a ~ v c v c c o c U ~~- - O J T N 6 U F N ~ T. W /I U r- m ro c m o C L N 6 C G i J ~O N O QQ•~ V i u. ~~ n ~_ _ L m a N m N N N O ..r,~., _ •~~ tPPLIfPiION FOR PICOHOLIt 6N[RAOE LICENSFI5I ~I _-_w PFS~~~'_L fEUEE(Slu -~'rf FILE NO ,< .. 104' B~rnd.oy ~ ~ ez"Y896 ~ Eo,•o,rr.r<.:a...59'9 -~_a=C iE FOlY°uSl_ CE5-54'-E GE]ERAI ~ Gco GF nGV U'. ....,c-.o.~•c .:....o. ~ CSE-SAl.S NIfP, i CPIE I CDOE aaa_n~ , '.r_ c. .<~ a r, i ~ Rued <~d<, ., r a... 3 Y4YE $ .. • : C4~ '$'. ', Fero ir. r ~[ ..o. - - ~.f-'.: i - --~ EPern.: 'vao- _ ', fPrr'~y On~r --.. _._-__--_-.__-_,___-_,_._-_ L 5', Of 'oAhSR:_gC.u'S' _-'•iEE --__• L-( _ r .. I IyFE_ .. .. _ .. _..._ .. .. _ ._ __ _ ..._-l_ i S 1 ^ a,. J{ _.__-__._._._.-___.__---_-_____.__._ 240]1.1 tii_-_Jor ___--~ 1..'.."_~iit~ 7 ._ _ _ _ ~ ~ `=)= ..ci:l_ ill _ I~_ 914. {iij _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ RECEIVED __ _ __ .:!TY 0'F FM1NCNO CUCAT GA CITY CLERK _ _AUG 101992_-- -- ...-___--_ _.. ~_-- .O..o. -. a-.r.an)'nl ,.a:. 9a.:reedine" 'Sti .]2., ' 11~~11 y"I`y-'_yYP'n'f r .vide _~ el - r,~y t:,:~r__ i A r' LA, Eh 4„ ,CS A GE f' f\ 0 SO -- ~ C I P 9'I ~~r0. 9a ~ b- d Y IV Pr nr r~ d F, p -1 F M1<i[ I 5 :~ • a f mr F ~ ~~d co n nr .a _ P __`1 0 pf V.fiOtS 5V_i,Tl-0.'I:y'jkl pYHE:I'C O:F VES'_ _ _ _ __ ___ - - _ nlw<d wl• •~ and p.. < ". Fa- a9 '4 ~o'f. o• 'e . nd ~ ... .. _.i a ~-n n a n ab< '<do _ol h<+ _ _hasa _a En. g ,_o Ic'-___ _r - cuv o o+rrr~ roc v _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ ' .r LA'S ANGl CF:S e q ~../ r / 1 / ' ~ ~ gPPIICATION 0Y TR ANSEEROR ,~,,~-pri :,nS p;;f,P.LRS ...... ..om<.. J.':EY.25. 179.: / ~•r r'~! H V NFI ~. 1 4t~~ !J 0 N ; [ cV- ' '~[. t F I FK OFN'[ A10 AS ISTA'1[ I SEq IN 5 Aff y!'S _4. _..._..>_-1 .._.-.. . I S e;. I _ _ r . ~:.~I'(~V`vlr,•r~jA@~COIS~Si7i1°.~._a-'JY'.2'i 11AP.;.~S_A!i(; E'LS.. L1 _.10uL1.._ .-_-.:.US At1GL'.k:.i -_-___' rn: a„r u'.:I~ n.n•r. +mr r:.... Ian. n•r:~rlmrnr of n.av .. ne„ ~ v d o.,, r~E', un,m ot.la-~. ..... .., d e.,... nP,... art•'a' 40 ~~ • 8754 8750 8746 8744 8742 8740 8738 8736 8734 8732 M1 87981 r 8 CO 8781 ~ ~ M1 ~ N ~ M1 ~ M1 rte., °M1° p ago ~ 00 00 w m ro w b L d i O O ' C L O O V L T ~ d 3 L O N~-~.- Z N Y T N N LL'^.~.r- u ~ u _ O J C N N N 1~ .. L ~ ~ v o, v n C O ^ U N V O ~ G N d J~ 1] 'p Z U C O L O U ~ Y N O Ot O C 'O .C •r- L H 4~ ~O r~ G K Y O C V N O O d o W q N a E a ~ V' E L p K .c O L + - m.~ b O ~ u u ¢ 3•~v•~ O N N Q~ U .G O LL J Z £ Z } c U N O H r-~ O L O` .. .. LL .G Ql C L L .. YYY Q: b C O C L ~ N N ~ ~ F- ~~ a tnw3 C(1RNEL I FlN ~ IQ 0 M M1 r W WMM ~11~ N v N N N z b N 7\ G- O ° ~ LIC[NSE~Si .PPLICATION fOR 4CONOLIC 6N[RAGE " l rvPE~S. CF•4E`2E S' PlF n0 = D<w~,-[,. >I A<,n<.< eererea• c.nu<: f.4iS xgc~P~ o 'r~ 9,cea_o. ='se Js sv::=mmo Cm~l 059:9 ;.OS ANC.Fr ec^+F'Pr` „'c -$A;,E GENERAS I GEOGPAPHIUI "'^"`^°"""_°"'^ ]FF-SALE. °EE3 n '::r1E CODE :333-Jn v breoy acvlw lar ~~. .[ m dv<,Sed or bllv~.. e } NANF 5, pP APP[]CA:Vif S __ _- __ nypbed ,rder Se< }WU ~ I - --- CCPe^C'\TiJq ',P-:2i EPea,.e Dar.., Eprte.e Dme _ ''.'C ~ ] 'YPES 0< •PANSAC ICNr51 ~. JYPE _.- _- 5 _ __ ~J;i.i1i22,1- - }6.. n. "` E"'"O` a _` NECEIYEO '' _ Y C: RPaxA>_r^s -- ~.;lW#AMIG1ERdEf1CAM(11/Gt-'.. s cmcLERN gEEC Base LOe aU~lQ ~~ '~ __ rancho Cucamonga 91JC1 San Eern artl:no--_---_. rOrnL L ~'" d'}' T AI 813011111311121 ]115161 .. Lm[+ ] Are Pre n Imide m e <f bmm< PU AVD }1 r ____ C^r '•~m 4ddrcv "! dI^ + m 5;-NUmbe• Pnd 9n 3 Ho+Yrg e .-. r..^ ! EO% 92333 uGAI DNAY POPT~FNrEP > LOS ANf.ELES EA 90003 p vcre rv. [r<+ Seen c>nr.<•ed el a releny> 10 Xer< y<u ! riolared a of tF< o o el IFe AI<eACI~: ~ r Depanmrnr o<r rhe Be+vage Control Aa ar ecnr or ~cI YO ,P-f1 :GRPOAATION/ ~"~"q re me YFS V ` - °ES" mr 9 or 10 0 o c r r or rbu apo'•wxe be deemed po 0•m<m ^b<F rne d FS+ SALZ '.0 Y.INCR V[Ot A'LIONS SETLLE O VITN PAYnF.u't ne eiucc _____ _ ',} aq•e any n pager employed in a A<e xd pn i r,~ll ba.e all rF[ Prv':Gmrmm of c Lome and er F!_ JI , iolare o r pump ro be eolotA ony of rFe nl ~,A< AlmMllr Bbacg< _ ^___ ol+ r.ovme 'J P.rE JF :u6ORNIA Cevary or .. LOS. ANGELES .......Dab ................... . • ~!.., - - ~N 11 rArr~1EAM ~~~~~ ~n°.m ~,.n In<.. n•w!°on.. i,. .. ra r^ +, r nr. .. .r<u-.. ~n, „r.o..~ ,° .,,, a u~. ~. ...,. ,..! .rem .. ... ............ ~................... .. _... ~, SIGN XFJPF/_.. ~ ,.~/ .-. / . - _ _ ............. APPLICATION RY TRANSfFROR 5 Eutf. Or UUFpgwA Co~nry el ... OS AUC6LE5____,____. .Oeb .,i.VI,Y.2.4..149<........ -, •..I. _ n vn~.al nr .arr[er. ^ • .••' ••~~~•• ~• ~„ Lw°'P S.g+orvrelll of L.yy<e01 _ __ t9 ' [ n_b[,M '::•:RIFTI' CORPORAL i08 (P-12 LA /YETG01 9Y: - ~ I tt-U>ehv[ _ -~-- ,'Th. N ftEi -SEtD ER ' ' ' PLUS OTHEA ..i~E =~I V,~_ _L_ ____-- }3--- CAN f__ b'[CL PP GS IUEN C AND AS.c.IS _ SE$_IY STAiE 1J ' ,>EL0.F.TARY a'sy AlrJ 2l S _.__-_ ilD;r` -»-- _ -__._._____- _ _.__. nd 5n<!I 'G Ionn~bq „•ulN !cCYP 1 r 4 Codr C d Ceurh , Q3 91QP4C ___ ____ J($A LAE .~4;.~y'~Apy 1Nf F F .yp$. rllI n _. J.US.ANtlLLLS Dn \'or k'-ne 8elnm Thu Lmu Fn[ Orperrmenl Ga Only . named Pe<md[d re+tt. " Pdor~nn aaPen. .... C^r FS NAM1EO .. ....O J-tE -i2 -. .,n• I ~ e- ,.. r aTrunu~ ~ ~ 2C if I 2A 2f ZSiL o ~ P o 0 0 cL acn - - L r. ~~n o ov ~ E ~a o O S U1 O S P Z C L N 9 O z C T N C 'O N N C U N ~0 ~O L r Y N N L ~ Y p) Y C C p d rc U 41 O O O U L i= L a c +~ a a N N W O k +` 'O •~ ~ K O O m C 0 ~'i L L N N L 6 u v Tu ~ O m [Y 2 L d a d fs r W £ L U C O' j ~ 30 ' ~ ~ Y S O V J Z O O O Y y y m C L t C L ~ VI ~S O O O ~O N N Z N W 3 O ~ Q U ~ L X O q ~ V ~y t$ 9 Q a o _ N O L r o a O~ L P ~ ¢ •v za:l z O T ~'+ O I- K m Q C a - K W C N ~ ~ E o d' J rO N O v ~ T - _ ~ v m a ? N Y N d 1- [O O G ~ LL L N ~ rv O U L - A [C Ill C L ~ 2 ~p /O ~ H P ¢ U I N T O 2a U1'1'Y Ob' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, ]992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBIECI': TRANSFER OF $40,000 FOR ADDITIONAL APPRAISAL AND CONSULTANT WORK FOR CFD 88-2 ft is recommended that the City Council approve the transfer of 540,000 from account 76-4130-7920 to account 75-413D-6028. This fund transfer will cover the costs associated with an additional appraisal and additional consultant costs for [he sale of bonds in Community Facilities District (CFD) 88-2. In 1989 the City Council approved agreement CO 89-ll1 with the Caryn Company to fund the construction of drainage facilities. These facilities are nearly complete and the staff is making preparations to sell bonds as outlined in the agreement. In order to sell bonds, it is necessary to analyze the tax allocation formula to insure that revenues are sufficient to cover the debt service. Also. it is necessary to have a current appraisal and updated market absorption study of the project as the sceurity for the bonds is the land in the District. For the above reasons, staff is requesting that $40.000 be transferred from the collected taxes that the developers have been paying in the District and be used to fund these costs. This transfer will not affect the general fund. Respectfully Sru/bm'i/tftniepd~ ~~ ~"~° Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager UAB/dab 2~ t,IZ z yr tt.vrv~nv ~v~r+mviv t>t+ STAFF REPORT DA^_'E: September 19, 1992 T'\ 50: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~~lll JacY Lam, 9ICP, City Mana qer FROM: Brad Eu Ller, City Planner 9't: eancy Fo ^.g, Sensor Planner SU BJ EC^.• CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL TO VARIANCE 92-02 - SILVA - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the request to reduce the required interior side yard setback from 5 feet to E inches Erom the property line for a single family home in the Low Residential Cistr ict (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10077 Ironwood Street - APN: 1077-041-64. B1ICFGAO[MD A[ the public hearing on September 2, 1992, the City Council directed sta Ef to prepare a resolution upholding the appeal and approving Variance 92-02. Attached for your review is the resolution. If the City (:oun cil concurs, adoption would be in order. Respectfully submitted, ~~i_~ B ra_ Pu Ller Ci ry Planner BE:NF /7 Es At [a rh moots: Resolution of Approval Z 2 R.EOLUT ION N0. ~a' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFOR.N IA, UPHOLDING THE APPEAL AND APPROVING VARIANCE L70. 92-02, REDUCING THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YA P.D SETBACOC FROM 5 FEE? TO 6 INCHES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FOR A SINGLE a^AMILY HOME IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-d DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE1, LOCATED AT 10077 IRONWOOD ET REET, AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-041-64 A. Rerita ls. (.i) David R. 6 Tama lyn R. Silva ha•~e filed an application for ih_ issuance of Variance No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as the "application." (ii) O~ July 22, 1992, the Planning Commi esion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearlnq, adopted Resolution No. 92-95 thereby reccmmendinq to this City Council that said application be denied. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commi scion Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. (iv) On Sv_p tember 2 and continued to September 16, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hearings on [fiat date. (v) All legal prerequis i[es prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fellows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Aesolut ion axe true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced hearings on Reptember. 2 and September 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Ae so lotion No. 92-95, together with public testimony, [his Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) T}:e appl.ica Lion applies to property located at 10077 I: unwnod Etrect with a street frontage of 7R feet and lot depth of 112 Eeet cad is Presently improved with a single family home; and ~3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUT IOS NO. VAR 92-02 - SILVA September 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north, south, east, and west of the subject site contain single family homes; and (cl The applicant has constructed a carport that is setback 6 inches from tF.e oreperty line; and (d) Because of the lack of official records, the City is unable to verify or dispute the applicant's records, showing some form of City authorization for the construction of the carport to be 6 inches from the oroperty line at the closest point; and (e) The immediate easterly property owner was present at the meeting and stated on public record that he does not object to the setback and the location. o: the carport structure and he understands fully [hat the east elevation of the carport structure will be a stucco solid wall; an3 (E) 'Phe location of the street light pole and underground utilities crease practical difficulty and physical hardship so Ghat the applicant cannot fully uti]ize his side yard; and (g) Because of the unusual ciccumstancea, the granting of this variance shall not constitute setting a precedent for the entire City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public heating, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a~ That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That thr_re are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances oz conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distz ict. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the variance will not constitute a ge'ant of special privile qe irconsis tent with the limitations on other proper^_ies classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to fhe public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties nr improvements in r.he vicinity. 2 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLU'i ION N0. VAR 92-02 - SILVA September 16, 1592 Page 3 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Variance No. 92-02, subject to the following conditions: Planning Division 1) View-obstructive fencing and/or gates shall be provided to screen the storage of the boat, subject to City Planner review and approval. Building end Safety Division 1) The applicant shall submit building plans showing compliance with the la teat adopted Uniform Building Code, obtain all necessary permits, and pay the fees. 2) The applicant shall correct and complete the construction of the carport within 45 days of the date of the adoption of this resolution. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to David R. S Tamalyn R. Silva that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought i.s governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit x certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to David R. & Tama lyn R. Silva at the address identified in City records. ~, 5~ vlrx yr nalvcnv cucem~ly ua STAFF REPORT UA2E: September 16, 1992 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AIC P, City Manager F Rte;:. Bred puller, City PlanneY BY: Anthea Narti g, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMAA% RESIGNATION 92-01 - Approval to designate the Central Public School (known also as Sweeten Na11I, located at 9324 San Bernardino Road, as a Historic Landmark. Ia3COMffi1DATIQ7: The Hiatoric Pre ae rvation Commission re cocmends the designation of the Central Public School as a Historic Landmark with the adoption of the attached Resolution. BACAGROOMB: Few bu.ldings remain to remind us of life in the Cucamonga community, circa 1915, and even fewer schools have survived intact. The Central School, DuiLt in the then popular MSSSion Revival style around 1917, stands as one of the oldest, unaltered schools in the City. Since the first school building in Cucamonga was built on this northeast corner of Hellman Avzmae and Ean Bernardino Road in 1990, children have been traveling to and from this site and service groups and many other cLUbs Have spent countless hours working together in a spirit of corununity outreach and cohesiveness. Thus for the majority of this century, the structure has stood as a living, lasting reminder of the area's spirit and heritage. pISTORIC P1~SHRVATION COlMISSIOB X.'TiON: At [he request of the Cucamonga azrvice Club and the property's owner, the Coamission held an advertised public hearing on August 6, 1992, and passed a Resolution re conone nding the designation of the school building as a Hiatoric Landmark. Re ep f y s i e Brad ec City P .Hoer BB:AH: mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - ^PC Eta f.f Report dated August 5, 1992 Exhibit "B" - HPC Resolution No. 92-03 Reso lut i.on of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 5, 1992 TD: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation FROM: grad Hu 11 ez, City Plano ex BY: Anth ea M. Harti g, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGliAT ION 92-01 - CCCAMONGA HfiRVICE CLUH AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to designate the Central Public School (known as Sweeten Hall), Located at 9326 San Bernardino Road, Rancho Cucamonga, ag an NisGOric landmark - APN: 20H-111-09. BACAGNDDND Staff has been working with the Boar3 of the Cucamonga Service Club over the past few months in efforts to survey and now landmark this important community structure which was originally listed as SUS (Surveyed with Undetermined Significance) on the City's Historic Site Liat (see Exhibit "A"). 6IT6 LOCATION AND DBSCRIPPION Lorat ion and Description' Situated on the northeast corner of the intersection of San aernatdino Road and Hellman Avenue, the site's topography is relatively flat. The parcel is 2.19 acres in size. Site Land Use Zoningr General Plan Designations: The site is currently uti li red by a variety of community groups and clubs, predominantly by the Service Club, and has been the home of the regional Head Start school program for many years (the program first utilized the older class xoom~ but now occupies a modular classroom placed at the rear of the site). The site is designated Low Density Residential (2-4 awe Ll ing units per acre) Fer the General Plan and Development Districts Map. Surrounding Land Use, eon in q, General Plan/Specific Plan Designations: T'ne land to the north, east, and west is also zoned for Low Density Resrdential use, while that to the south is designs tad Office/Mixed Use by the Foothill Bou Levard Specific Plan. Physical Description: This roughly U-shaped, single-storied structure of poured concrete opens to the west, onto San Bernardino Road, With two classroom wings flanking a large central hall/auditorium wing. A aeries ~~f arches support a portico extension from the building face of this ExH , btu "A'. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 92-D1 - CENTRAL SCHOOL August fi, 1992 Page 2 main !south) facade. The central wing extends north, across the building pane of the two flanking wings, where it intersects at a right angle a sinyle storied auxiliary structure that is oriented to the north. It first apoeared to staff that this rear portion cou Ld be an addition, but if it were, it was added shortly after initial construction because it is shown on the 1929 Sandborne Map (see Exhibit ..g ). A decorative raised-edge parapet, indicative of Mission Revival styling, wraps around the edge of the entire cross-gabled roof joining two symmetrical towers which rise above the parapet line and are located on ei rher side of the rear of the central hall. The parapet gives the structure an appearance taller than just a single story. The roof is wood framed and rafter ends are exposed along the overhanging eaves. While many of the doors have been replaced over the years, most of the original one-ever-one light, double-hung windows remain. Other decorative elements include sound attic Vents and trimr another Mission Revival style detail, with roping painted to highlight the parapet's movement. A[ULYSIS Historical 9ackground: This structure was built on the site of the first school constructed in the Cucamonga townsi to around 1390. The year 1915 marked the formation of the Central School District, the first district in the local area. The new school was constructed between 1915 and 1917 in commemoration of the new districi and after the first school had been demolished. Just down the street was the developing downtown of Cucamonga, which by 1913 was complete with everything from a bakery co a billiards room, with a hank, post office, and at least two wagon repair shops. Si gni Eicance: Historical and Cultural - Although a small, growing roimnunity, the erection of both Central Public Schools represented the dedication the 2,800 residents had to education. Apart of Cucamonga's core - San Bernardi no Road and Azchibald Avenue - the school played an important role in the townsite's development in the 1920s and 1970 s. :he school and its grounds continued to serve an important function in the young community. Then a boy, pitcher Aolly Fingers and many other k»ys played baseball in the first Little League field in the area which was located rn the back of the school. In the mid-1920x, the area's first coy Scout troop met in the school which also housed the meetings of the Cucamon qa-Alta Lama Women's Club and the Cucamonga Service Club. The school became a community hall in the late 1960a thanks to Mr. Sweeten, uho purchased the site when the district constructed a new school. The two aforementioned clubs first purchased the hail together and later the Service Club bought the Women's Club share in 1985. Zg HPC STAFF REPORT ID 92-01 - CNTPAL sC HOOL August 6, 1992 Pa qe 3 Architectural: The school's ii-shaped arrangement, commanding size, and strong Mission Revival styling make it a standout structure in the City's inventory of pre-1915 buildings. Constructed of poured-in-place concre Le, the school remains one of the very Eew public structures built so substantially. Issues: Staff welcomes this designation and has a deep respect for the concern the Cucamonga Service Club has far the site. Environmental Assessment: Landmark de si gnationa are exempt under CEQA per Article 19, Section 15308. This designation is accompanied by a duly advertised public hearing. PACTS POR PLdDINGS Per Section 2.24.090 of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, the following findings are made concerning the designation of the Central Public School (Sweeten Hall). Historic and Cu ltuial Significance: Finding: The proposed landmark is particularly rapzesentative of an historical period, type, style, region, or Nay of life. Fact: Few public buildings remain to remind ua Of Life in Cucamonga circa 1915, and even fswer schools have survived intact. Finding: The proposed landmark is of greater aqe than most of its kind. Fact: The structure may be the oldest, unaltered school in the City. Finding: The site is the location of an important historic event or building. E'a ct: Si nre the first school in Cucamonga was built on this site in the early 1890's, its significance lies both above and below ground. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting Find Ong: The proposed landmark in ire location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. 29 HPC STAFF REPORT ID 92-01 - CENTAAL SCHOOL August 6, 1992 Page 4 Fact: Children have been traveling to and from this site for close to 100 years, service groups and many other clubs have spent countless hours working together in a spirit of community outreach and cohesiveness throughout the majority of this century, and as such, the structure stands as a living, lasting reminder of the area's heritage. RHCOMIQIDATI06 Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commis aion forward its approval to the Clty Council to designate the Central Public School (Sweeten Hall) as an Historic Landmark. Re spe ly submitted, Brad ller City Planner BB:AH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Landmark Application with Photographs Exhibit "B" - Huilding Footprint from 1929 Sandborne Map Resolution of Approval 3D Ca ty o1 , Appl lcatlon for HISTORI I' LAHDYARE DESIGNAT IDN HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION X Historic Landmark Historic Poinc of Interest IDENTIFICATION 1. Common Name: Sweeten N.a 11 2. Historic Name, 1f known: Central School 3. Street or Rural Atldrees: 9324 Sar. Bernardino Road City: C~camo.^.oa Zip: 91i3O County: San Be rn at'd ino Assessgr's Parcel No. 208-111-09 Zone: Low-Residential Legal De ecr iptioo: NW4 of the SW~ of the SE o~f Sect. 3, Township iS, Rance 7W San Bernardino Base and Meridian 4. Present (Jwner, if l-wwn: r:,~~_ m•. o cl~,~lAdreaa: o_n_ arcs a^ City:000amonca 21p: 91730 Ownership Se: public private X 5. Present Une; Meeting Hall, Schoobrlginal Use: School Other past DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the preeeot phyarc alma •aranc~e of tke Bite or structure and dencrlDe any ma,7or • tel rat 3ona from Sta original coedltioo: This U-shaved, single storied structure of poured concrete opens onto San Bernardino Road with two classroom wings flanking a large central hall/auditorium 7 A highly decorative, raised-e Loc atlon sketch map (tlraw \ laD: site end aurrounding at rest s, roads, and promleent lee dmarb) j Q 2 I4 N „ ^ Genfra ca ii NsY) ~ n SAN BERNARDINO jZp, dge parapet, indicative of (Cont.) 1 g. App roximate property size: Lot SS Ze (lo feet) Frontage 339' Depth '~~ or aD Drax. acreage 9, Con dition: (check one) •. Excellent- D. Good_ c. Fa lr X d. Det eriorated_ e. No longer So ex latence_ 10. Ia the featurt: a. Altered?_ h. Unaltered? X 11. Rur roundinga: (check more than one if necessary) ~,i a. Oven land X I b, Residential % c. Scattered huildioga_ a. Densely built-up_~_ e, commercial t. Induce rial g. Ocher 31 EJ~nr~~T ,:~,) 12. Threats to Site: •. None known- b. Private development c. Zoning_ C. Pub llc Ilotks Prajeet_ e. Vandalism % (, Otber_ 13, -at es Of evclosed photo graph(s) NOTE: Tne [o13ow1vR (Items 16-19) are foz structures only. 14. Primary enter iot pull ding material: a. Stone b. Er1ek_ c. Stucco- d. Adobe- e, llood_ f. Other COncxe to 1S. Is the Structure: i. Ov its origlval site? yes b. Yoved7 c. Unknown? 16. Yesr of Initial Cov et ruct SOn: t9ta_loon Th19 Date is: •. Factual b. Estimated % 1]. .4 rchltecx (Sf known) 18. Builder (it knowv ): 19. Related Features: a. Barn b. Carrlaga house c. outhouse d. Sked(q e. lormal Garden(s) t. Ilivdmill g. 1latertower/t ankknuae b. Other School field; 1. Nona field tower/concession stand SIGNIFICANCE 20. Bristly ante hiatorlcal and/or archiLecLUral importavice (iveluda dales, svest •, and Deraoae aaloc hied wStb the site wbes keOwn ): The school's U-shaped arrangement, commanding size, and st ro nq mission-revival styling make it a stand-out structure in the City's inventory of pre-1925 buildings. Constructed of poured ir,-place concrete, the school retrains one of the very few (cont.) 21. Main theme of She historic reeourcei (ebeck ov ly one): •. ArebltecLUie b. Arta a Lelaure c. EcooomSC/Iadueirial d. covernmeot e. Eaplaratioa/Settlewht f, tlilltary g. ftellglov h. Social /Educatioe % 22. Sources: List hooka, documents, surveys, pe non t7 lnterV iewa, •nd their dates: Interviews with Gene ^illina s, Ada Cooper; Clucas, tight Over The Mounts in• 1920 Census data 23. Date form Drepared 29 May 1992 By (name): A. Hartig Address: 10500 Civic Center Dr. City: R. Cucamonga Zip. 91730 Phone: (71G) 989-1861 Organlzatton: City Clsy Cse Only 3Z ~x~+~s(T A-i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: q~ SRN P,E12n~Atzr~ N p R ~ APIs r~,O.F •I I ! ~ Oq ~._. r_,:d~, View LookingMov~•ft ..oa. Date of Photo _,.]L..~ca. 1992 . View Looking Llortfn .Date of Photo ~~ ~ ~• I GQ , 4H8tT A-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 8324 SM.t 5E2NA2C1 NO RD App _2pQ- II I~- ~ ~` ~~ _~ ;-_ _~.~- View Looking ~eu.t G_. .Date of Photo : fulu IAQ2 __ ~ o. ~ - .:_ View Looking ou .+t .tf' Date of Photo . HISTORIC PRESERVATTON COIvL'~IISS[ON LANDDIARK SURVEY Address: -' 1:~2 ~ `' 1J G.EPJJaRD~ hAn RD APB 2~ SC - ~ ~ J~q~_ i -,T. _ .~~ View Looking'Nm ~/. ~a~ .Date of Photo ~JAA2 iy. ,_ .~ _~ „4 , ~~ - -- ...~ ....~. Y. ,:~ -_ .~ View Looking~otA.t~tAA~ Date of Photoel~ IQq Z ffiSTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LAh~biARK SURVEY Address: 9?~Zq- ~AtJ E~N6P~ Nb 12D. AP# ~' I ~ ~-' O~ ~ ,~~ ~~ ViewLooldng.SQlfil-F^ .Date of Photo DULY 19g2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: ~t_ 3~t( ~4s~1 V~E2.n~GR.17~ h!'O Fib AP# 2'0$ -I 1 I -~ i i ~ - ~# " z ,. :~ =.~ ~. ,, :`. __. ..a ~` ~ -J . Y View Looking3a~yte. _ ,Date of Photo cTu Z , I i~. 4 +. 1~l I k . ~ i~r ..~ ' --~'~a~~ . i _ v'Y~ ..,..y. View Looking t.lo .Date of Photo 3~ I , 31 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COhIIvIISSIOti LA\'DMARK SURVEY Address: g3'L4~aht P~GRr.1o.RL1 W d RD AP#'LOS' I C I _T ~, View Looking SOttKitWlSt1" ,Dam of Photo JUI.~(1 qqZ .n.. .. .• . ,A- _ ~-._. .. e t A ,4 t P 4 ~ I Y J yJ A S T~ l~.l Ri yy © yy~~~ ©i •~ _T__ .r__.r.._"-i __r__ __r-T- _ _.. __- CUCAMWW AV. 41 ~- i '~ F ~ i ~ ~ i~3 s ' ~ N ~r~H+Bi'T "8" - .~v~dbovhe Map, ~97f1 ~ar~wloaK. vesic,N.d-R'oN g2-ol caN"T-zel- pu8uc ~.rjooL 3°I RESOLUTION N0. 92-03 A AESOLUT ION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTOAIC LANDMARK 92-01 TO DESIGNATE THE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOCL (SWEETEN HALL)r LOCATED AT 9324 SAN HE[LNARD INO AOAD, AS A LANDMARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-11?-09. A. Recitals. f11 The Cucamonga Service Cluh and the City of %ncho Cucamonga have filed an application Eor a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this AeBO lotion, the subject is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 6th day of August 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of %ncho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) X11 legal prerequiaitea prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. e. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commi esion of the City of %ncho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all cf the Facts see Eo rth in the Recitaler Pert A, of this AeHO lotion are trve and correct. 2. The appllca Lion applies to approximately 219 acres of land, basically a square <onf iguraiion, located at 9324 San Bernardino Road. 1. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commi sa ion during the above-referenced heating on August 6, 1992, inc lading written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and purauent to Section 2.24.090 of the %ncho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commise ion hereby makes the Entlnwing findi nga and facts: .4. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding: 11 The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. c'act: Few public huildi ngs cema in to remind us of life in Cucamon 9a circa 1915, and even fewer schools survived vntact. ~fl HPC RES OLCTION NO. 92-,1 LC 92-01 - CENTRAL SCHOOL August 6, 1992 Page 2 Fi ndin9: 2) The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. ?act: The structure may be the oldest, unaltered school in the City. Findi nc: 3) The site is the location of an important historic event or building. Fact: Since the first school in Cucamonga was built on this site in the ear Ly 1890'x, its ai gniEicance lies both above and below ground. B. Neighborhood and Geographic S<tting: Finding: 1) The prcposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual Feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Fact: Children have been tray<linq to and from this site for close to 100 years; service greupa and many other c1ub9 h eve spent countless hours working together Sn a spirit of community outreach and cohesivenasa throughout the majority of this century, and ae such, the structure stands as a living, lasting reminder of the area's heritage. 4. Rased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commisa ion hereby resolves that, pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark Application LD 92-01 on this 6th day of August 1992. 5. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Aeso L~^_ion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH UAY OF AUGUST 1992. BY: / Marsha Mee s, Chair n AYES: COM.M IS SIGNERS: ARN ER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT, TESSIER NGEE: rOM.MISSIONE RS: NONE ABSEtiT: COMMISSIONERS: HASKViTZ NI RESOLUTION No. ~a.- a¢3 A RESOLUTION OF THE ^_ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-01, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE CENTRAL PllBLIC SCHOOL (SWEETEN HALL), LOCATED AT 9324 SAN 9E RNAADINO ROAD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDING IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-153-O t. WHEREAS, The Cucamonga Service Club hea filed an application for Landmark Designation 92-61, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Deaignation is referred to as the "application". WHEREAS, On August 6, 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Fancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92-03, thereby recommending to thin City Council that said application be approved. WHEREAS, on September 16, 1992, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. WHEREAS, all legal prezequiaities prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEPEFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: SECTION L• The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Number 208-153-01. SECTION 2: The proposed landmark masts the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a historical period and way of life. 2. The proposed Iandma rk is of greater age than moat of its kind. 3• The site is the location of an important hie toric event or bui ldl ng. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an eatab lished and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, and city (ord. 70 59, 1979). 42 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LD 92-0/ - CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOL September 16, 1992 Page 2 SECTION 3: Designation of a Landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Section 15308). SECTION 4: Based on the subeta ntial evidence received and revi r+ed by this Council and based on the findings set forth above: BE IT PURTHEA RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga appzovea the designation of the Central Public School ae a Historic Landmark. 43 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE September t6, 1992 TD Mayor and Members of the City Council lack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBIELT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO CONDUCf AN APPRAISAL OF CFD 88-2 It is recommended that the City Council approve a professional services agreement for an amount nut to exceed 528,000 to perform an appraisal of Community Facilities District (CFD) R8-2. This agreement is to be funded from account 75-4130-8028 and will not affect the general fund. It is necessary to have a current appraisal of this District prior to selling bonds to cover the costs of the drainage facilities that have been built. An appraisal is necessary because under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act, the security for the bonds is the land in the District. Since the last appraisal was completed a number of unexpected delays have occurred. These delays have caused the old appraisal to become dated and no longer useful for puryoses of selling and marketing bonds. For the above reasons it is necessary ~o have a new appraisal done. This appraisal will be completed by November and will provide an updated opinion of the land value in this District. The cost of this appraisal is being paid for out of the special taxes that developers have been paying into this District for the past four years. This appraisal cost will not have an impact on the general fund. The cost for this appraisal will not exceed S2R,000. This cost is based on the fact that an entirely new appraiser may need to be retained. The appraiser who has done past work in this District may not be available to work on this project (or anmher four months and this would delay the sale of bonds considerably. crrr couNCa Ml~rlxG APPROVAL Tn EXECUTE AGREEMENT FOR APPRAISAL September 16, 1992 Page 2 A delay in the sale of bonds would create an economic hardship fora number of the contractors that performed work in building the drainage facilities in the District. For this reason the District has decided to consider retaining a different appraiser so that we may meet the obligations of Purchase/Financing Agreement 89-111 without creating undo hardship for contractors who have performed work in the District in good faith. Reep~ecttully Submitte~ Duane A, Baker Assistant [o the City Manager DAB/dab ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1992 TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FORM: RICK GOMEZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR BY: TARRY SMITH, COMMUNITY AND PARK DEVELOPMENT SUPT. SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. , TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE SPORTS COMPLEX ON ARROW HWY., AND ROCHESTER AVE. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the easement request by Southern California Edison Co., for construction and maintenance of electrical service to the sports Complex. BACKGROUND/ANAi vcr9 The Southern California Edieon'COmpany is requesting the City of Rancho Cucamonga to grant a construction and maintenance easement and right of way that will allow Edison to construct and maintain the electrical service equipment needed to operate the Sports Complex. construction of this facility will include underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholes, and could include above ground enclosures, markers and concrete pads. staff recommends that council approve this request for easement and right and of way. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement which is attached. Director :TLS EASEMENT AGREEMENT PEGpgOING gEOUEBTEO BY ~S 9aMhaa Otlmi Fla Calp~ry WNEN PECpgp EO M/,It TO ~ w 9oMMm PaalarrlM EOron Cpnpary Real Raperties mrd AdmmislralNe 5<rWCp 430 N. Vineyard Ave., Suite 2 t0 Orliarb,G 91)63 Attn: Emtem Region DRAIPP OP BABEDfENT ICOrporatlonl 9rNLE SBnVE 1X6 LINF rOfl RFLOPLF P'S 113 ~ ~ .°a. Foothill 5.r9O~232B °•2~250T 55-98 !~ n E roe0r ` • rf"sw nNeewrer.n..x nsa~ ~ -__ YlElf W/OB/92 _ CfiY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA a Mumclpal rorpomtbn (heretmRtt afened to m'Gnnlofl. hereby gmnta to SOtTFHF.RN CAl1FOttNbl EDISON COMPANY, a <orpomtbn, Its aucceswrn arM asMgns ihereinaRer refeMd tom "Cranttt"1. an ms®erd arN rlghl d way to comtrum, ux, rmmism, operate. alter, add to, rcpak, replace, recoretmd. Wpcct and remove el arty Wne aM from t~ to time urdergrnuM eleclrlcal soppy systems arld c9rtvnumcenon systems (herehreRer referred tom "ayslenM'7, emul+tk+g of Wcs, underground mndulls, cables, vauris. maMOlo. haMholp. errd Irrrdudkp alNwe~gronM mclasurp, markers end concrete pads and other eppur4erent flalurp end egvtpment nepseary or uxful mr tlislributtng electrical enerp and for tmnsmltung inteWgerlce by ekeirleai mean, er. 0r4 over, uMer, across and along that certain real properly m the Coumy d San Eertlardino. Stale of Cehf0mla, deecrtbcd as fellows: A strip d land B fee[ in wldlh IYinR within Int 2] d Ne Mep d Raehesltt aubdMalon as per map rrcardcd m Oook 9. Page 20 d Mepa. records d aeld Cgvnty. Th<adedtrc dsvd strip being dearOed as fo8owa: Beglnntng rn the Ea_Werly kne of Rocherier P.xnuc, as now otablWled, dbtent Ureron NorUtty TD feet from !hc Soulherty Ilm of said Iul 21. Scat pdnl being herebmiter deecnbed m Pohl "A': thence South B9°44'3T Wpl a dLMara< d I IB feet to a Pokrt hereWlltt refertM 1a as Patel "B'; Thence cmtmmrlg South B9°44'3T West a dLafarlce d 1T5 feet; Thn c North T I ° Weal a dlMantt d y0 feet: Thpce South 89°44'3T WvW a dt+une d 2TB feel: Thence NoM 1° Weal a dMlatae d ?8 feel to a point herclnaRtt refem'd to m Pdnl'C.. ALso a aldp of land 6 feet m wltlih yklg Mlhm saM Inl 21: the Wplerly Ilse d eatd Wtp 4a1g deacnbed as follows; CLmmencmq at the aforcmertloncd Point "A", Mena Northerly along Ne faslery line of Rocheeltt Avenue a dlsW rcc of 30 fact to lhe'IYUe Point d Begbvdrg, thence Northerly along sold Easterly WIe of RochcUtt Avcnuc a diffiancc d 12 fM. ALaL a sldD of land 10 fttt In wldlh ying within mMl 1.0121: Th< ttnledine d said step being described m follows; Begllmmq at the aforcmcntlonetl Potnl'U': Thence North t` Weal a tlLMonce of 23 feel. Nso a step of land l5 feel to wtdiM1 yinR Thin said tat 21: iTe antMine d aeltl sWp Mlrp deaadwd m follows: OeRlnning at the doremrntloned P01n1 "C": Thentt South 89°44'3T' West a distance of 21 (eH. ThH ly{PI drsenpnon was prepared pursuant to Sec. eT3q<I d the Bua1n®h Prafeeebre Cade. The Grantor agrees (m i(xlf, ore successors and eaaignP, trot to erect. place or maintain, nor to penml the ertcllon, Dla<emenl or mamlererrce of arty buBdhrg. planter bm[ea, earth NI a dher almclurm exxpl walls and fenaa nn the above dexribed rpl propMy. The Omnlee, end Its contractors, agrnb arrd cmDloyep, shall here the right to trim or cut Iree roots as may endanger or interfere with seM eyeteroa erul shall have free eaex to saM systems end every part thered, el eB times, for the purpose of exerdamg the rights harem gr-anted: prm4eicd, however, that m makmR any eacavellon on saW property d the Cremor, the Grantee shall make Ue same in each manner as well coax the lent InJvry to the surface of the ground around such excavallon, erW shell replace the cadh so removed by N and restore the surface d the ground to as near the same condltbn es It was yrbr to such ucavetbn as M procOCeble, FJBiC VIED this , daY of -__._-___ • 19_ 41 u1~rs yr nnivi,nv a.uunaava...r~ STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 Tp; Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager FRpM; Nilliam J. O'Neil, Ctty Engineer gy; Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: ORTION OF A MASTERRPLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITf~INTCONNE~ION APPRO%IMATELY~IBO~EETACNORTH 11ND2360LEETDSOUTH OFPEHIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMIENDATIOM approving~t~nRe mbutrsementeAgreementouforl inst~a latton ofaah porttoo of oa Master Planned Stonn Drain in connection vAth development of Tract No. 12820, and authorize the Mayor and C1Ly Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Corporatloni tithe developer)alwasfrequlred Nto install aoportlon ofvalMeter Planned Storn Drain Facility located in Jasper Street approximately 180 feet been compl ted by the developeriendaacceptedeby theeCity~ drain facility has The developer has submitteA an lttntlzed accounting of the construction costs thessubmTttalr Thenamount due the developer 1e f249 111.78 slued and verified Respectfully submitted, ~~. i / ' William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JD:,1h Attachment W~ RESOLUTION N0. 9a-~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM ORAIN FACTLIIY IN CONNECTION NITH DEYELOPMENT OF TRACT N0. 12820 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Southland Development Corporation, developer, for the installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility located to Jasper Street approximately 180 feet north and 360 feet south of Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the devei oper, at the Bevel oDer's expense, has camel eted satd storm drain installation. NON THEREF018:, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that sold Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Relmburseinent Agreement in behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. ~~ 1:11'Y VF itANCHV UL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Yalbue~ia, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 11287 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RIDERS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET ANO ELM AYEMIE, SUBMITTED BY LEWiS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution aDDroving Parcel Map 11287, accepting the related improvement security riders, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. Parcel Map 11267, Located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Elm Avenue Tn the Parks District of the Terra V15ta Planned Community, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 26, 1990, for the creation of an 8.053 acre park site. The Developer, Lew15 Names of California, is submitting improvement Security Riders to guarantee the constructtort of the following Improvements: AMOUNT OF IMPROVEMENT FAITHFUL PERFORIMNCE BOND BOND N0. Community Trail on East 5137,000.00 223817S Property Line of School Site beMeen Elm Ave and West Greenway Park and the extension of MPSD Line 2-2 within the tra 11 MDSD 2-1 and 2-2 within 5238,274.00 2236065 Church Street and Elm Avenue ad,iacent to PM 11287 SD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P.M. 11287 - LENIS HOMES OF CALIF September 16, 1992 Page 2 AMOUNT OF iMPROYEMENT FAITHFUL PERFOIMANCE BOND BOND N0. Complete Church Street, E347,782.00 2236055 from Spruce Avenue to Elm Avenue and Bus Bay, north of Church, west of Elm Avenue Monumentation Cash Bond: E 2,450.00 Copies of the Improvement Security Riders are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ ~J y . t' C.~'_a ~ ~ '~ NTiliam J. O'Ne17 City Engineer NJO:NV:dlw Attachment .5 RESOLUTION N0. 9a, a~.`~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11287 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RIDERS NHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 11287, submitted 6y Lewis Homes of California, subdivider, and consisting of 1 parcel, Located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Elm Avenue to the Parks Dl strict of the Terra Yista Planned Community was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on September 26, 1990, as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is 1n compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 11287 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and NHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said Ctty have now been met by su6mitting Improvement Security riders by Lewis Homes of California as developer. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Security Riders submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved; and that said Parcel Map No. 11287 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer 15 authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 52 `J y ~'-~~s:/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEIItING DIVL3ION !"= lOl1~' N ~; PARCEL MAP 11287 'I7TI.E: V/C/N/TY MAP „ „ ExHISrr. A CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: RELplEMDATIgI Mayor, and Members of the Ctty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager N it Liam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec to r,L~~ ~--_-. APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 12832 - DAY CREEK BWLEVARD, LOCATED ON PROPOSED OAY CREEK BOULEYARD BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE, SU BMIITED BY THE NILLIAM LYON COMPANY It is r^ecommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACK6RQIN0/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12832 - Day Creek Boulevard was approved by the City Council on May 22, 1986, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 81,600,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: S 800,000.00 The developer, The William Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 12- month extension on said improvement agreement due to the slow economic conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, .~ ,, . Nil Liam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy Attachments LYON .~wILLIAM LYON~~ 4490 VON KARMAN. PO. BOX 7520, NEWPORT BFACH. CA 92658-7520 • (714) 833-3600 FAX (]tC) 476-0604 August 24, 1992 Mr. Steve Gillilantl Public Works Inspector ~ ~`'• - ' City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~'.: P~: ~. ' " - 105C0 Civic Center Drive .Pancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Extension of Improvement Agreement Tract 12832 - Day Creek Blvd. Dear Steve *ran smitted herewith are three (3) signed and notarized extensions, including a check in the amount of 3257.00, as required for subject project. Due to economic conditions, construction of this tract will not be completed within six (6) months, therefore we are asking for a one (') vear extension. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Bryan Austin at (714) 476-5415. Thank you for your cooperation. Respe tfully, 03~~1~ury,,_- Lori Brown Purchasing Inland Empire Division 1b:0052CRC cc: Bryan Austin S5. REAI E81 A1E DEVEIOPM F. Ni RESOLUTION N0. 5a,- a~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING [MPROYEMENT AGREEMENT IX TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12832 - DAY CREEK BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September i6, 1992, by The Nilliam Lyon Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on proposed Bay Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Victoria Park lane; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12832 - Day Creek Boulevard; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the CTty Clerk to attest thereto. Sb V IiY UC 1tANGriU UUGAhIVNIiA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilleland, Public Works Inspector fI__~~`~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAP 11585, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DEVON STREET AT KINLOCK AVENUE The required street improvements for Parcel Map 11685 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recoaaaended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Rond in the amount of 55,000.00, authorize the Ctty Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f50,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel MaD 11685 - located at the south side of Devon Street at Klnlock Avenue DEVELOPER: Jim O'Brien 1059 W. 16th Street Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 5,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f50,000.00 Respectfully submitted, 4 William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO: SMf ay Attachment s~ RESOLUTION N0. 9a _ a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT PARCEL MAP 11685 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of pubiit improvements for Parcel Map 11685 have been completed to the satl5factton of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. SU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 15, 1992 T0: Maycr and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector IIL~S~~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAP 11838, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND VICTORIA PARK LANE RECONIENDATION: The required street improvements far Parcel Map 11838 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the Ci[y Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5608,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 11838 - located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Yic toria Park Lane DEVELOPER: Nilliam Lyon Company 4490 Von Karman Newport Beach, CA 92658 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5608,000.00 Respectfully submitted, i Nilliam J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachment RESOLUTION N0. GJa-'~~S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPR04EMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11838 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 11838 hav¢ been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. W~ GR I VP ftH1VURV UUUH1v1ViVUn STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector~_-~~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE 80ND FOR TRACT 13748 - BANYAN STREET BRIDGE, LOCATED ON BANYAN STREET AT THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and Workmanship. DEVELOPER: M.J. Brock E Sons, Inc. 3380 Shelby Street, Suite 100 Ontario, CA 91764 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 522,900.00 Respectfully submitted, ~ ., i Nilltam J. O'Neil .. City Engineer NJ O:SMG:Iy CO (;1'1'Y ()F' HANCAO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,Tack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director HY: Karen Mc Guire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF THE HARDCWRT RETROP IT PROJECT AS CONPLETE, RELEASE HONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" AHCOMl~IDA1ROB: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Hardcourt Retrofit Project as complete, authorize the Community Development Director to file a "Notice of Completion", authorize the release of the Paithful Performance Hond in the amount of $44,097.00, rr_lease of retention in the amount of $9,409.70, and the Labor and Materials Bond i.n tine amount of $44,097.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. BM]CGwDm: Construction of the Bas eketball Hardcourte has been completed at Church Street and Windows Parks to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The original contract amount ae approved by Council was $dd,097 .00. There were no change orders on the project. I~ 2 Attachments: Reaolut ion A I7F9~iAT(27 OF 74~ C7TY WfIiCQ. ~' 747E CITY ~+ RANf~D CUC7flI2i<'Ar CALII21fRIIAr )V~fIIX; TAE P[~,IC Ii~l7VHffii15 IM1li 7N6 IiAS[~IDAIS, f1ATmCY7I1YL' Iiff!>bFlT P!Y)Ji7Cf AS O~+ISPFD AT ~AIZC47 3II?F.@P AbD WINQiDNS PAfIIC AtD A[TlfLitlZIIiG 74i6 PII.ING OF A NOPiCE Ol> ~IisRZCN IiR TFi6 i7:YdC td7FIZP/~S, the ~shvetim of psblic i~tw®a7ts fce the t..erorf,v77 harckast retrofit ~oject hax Leal cc~leted to the satiafactim of the ~mmity I>evelop~7t Director; and {aIkRFAS, a Notice o£ Crmpletion is required to Le Piled, certifying the cork ocaQlete. N041, , the City Ntaz:il of the City of IAml7o Aga does hereby resolve, that the work is hereby aooepted a7d the unity Develepoa7t Di++><'~'~- fs authorized to sign aid file a Nof1ce of Oo-(7lfttian vith the County Ideoorn]rs of San Hernardim ~aA.y. l03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer ~.;..;: t SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE 1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM, CONTRACT N0. CO 92-039, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" RECOMENDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council accept the Tree Planting Program, Contract No. CO 92-039, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of ;44,293.48 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of ;44,293.48, six months after recordation of said notice tf no claims have been received. Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of 54,429.35, 35 dAys after approval of the final contract amount of ;44,293.48. BACKGROUND/AIULYSIS The subtect protect was a small business administration protect involving the planting of 1,022 trees 1n the fotiowing seven (7) parks and three (3) Landscape Maintenance Districts: PARKS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS Vintage 103 trees Victoria Groves 65 trees Kenyon 108 trees Windrows 7 trees Spruce 10 trees Coyote Canyon 20 trees Mest Greenway 24 trees LMD 1 167 trees LMD 2 465 trees LMD 6 53 trees The tree planting has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer. The final contract amount, based on protect documentation 1s ;44,293.48. Respectfully submitted, `_~~C 1 ~.~~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:1y Rttachment RESOLUTION N0. 9a - ~S ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIIMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM, CO 92-039 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREgS, the construction of public improvements for 1992 Tree Planting program, CO 92-039, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ ca~lluva-e LA. 501 Art oBDl161nCE oP TFIE crrr oa RAti~nn COC'AL12J3A AEffimING Trr1E a oP TBE RAN~m CiX'ALQi^A Ef2JICIPAL CODE SY ADDING A NBi CEWPTFR 9.30 1771'11IFD "TAXICAB SERVICE," TNEBSIII NETIIIATIN(' Aim PIIAD.TT7NG THE OPEI7P.TION OF TAXIS. A. FQ&lt~l$- ~ CITY COIIA'~. ~ '1fIE CITY OP ItANNCtE3 CSJCAELIi1'A F]1m3 AS FC4I17YS: Q:apter 8.30 hecp2sf is added to Title 8 of the Randy Cuc~a Mmicipal Code to read in ~.erls and fig:ses, as follws: "Chapter 8.30 "TAXICAB SEINICE "r~ ^6.30.010 Defirtitiore. ^6.30.020 Pa<a1t Requited fo~'Taxicab 8etvioe. "6.30.070 Appll~atiT Pcr ~cgb mpg Permit. "6.30.040 I98naifOD oP Taxicab Service Pcnmit. "6.30.050 C1VlIIx1e for Denial ~ Revocation Of Taxicab SBraice Permit. "6.30.060 Permit Pees. "6.30.070 Taxicab Drivers Permit. "6.30.060 Appliwtian for a Taxicab Driver~e Pmmit. "6.30.090 Grgafds Por Daniel cr revocation oP Taxicab Criver~s Permit. "6.30.100 IHS0ar108 Of TexiWb Cslver~s Peermit. "6.30.ll0 Appeal PrvcacAaes. "6.30.120 Rawcation o! Permits. "6.30.130 E:mopt.lorfs. "6.30.140 Tams Par Ooanlianw hil Ekisting Taxicab Setvioee aryl Taxicab Rivera. "6.30.150 Penalty Por Violation. "8.30.0]A. Cefinitione. "AS used in the Q:apteT, the followirq terms shall have the meHTlitlga set froth below: "(a) Driver. Ivry person drivil3y a taxicab either as ommr or order the dixectim, ®ploymelrt cu:trol, cff eervioa of the owrt:ar ae herBin defined. ~~ @-AirUm, No. 501 ~ 2 "(b) owter. ELY peism having oonttol, whether bi' artrigtrt awnerBhip, lease or otherwise of arty taxicabs fcs hire. "(c) Parem. IInludes Loth sirgular and plural, and shall Wean and include any itdividual, firm, mrpar'atim, aesociatim, perhwsstti.p, or society, em;-luslva oP public agencies. ^(d) Taxicab. Ny vehicle whic3r is used to provide taxicab service as defined in this Qmpter. "(e) Taxicab Service. Taxicab service meam any public passenger ttangpmYatim service available far lure m call or d®rd rnmr the public stx@ets of the City of Perrdn C@CaIDOnga whets the service i8 710t provided over a defined acute lot L@tween sudr points and over such =Dotes as may La diractai by the pexscrr(s) turitg the same, and irzeepect3ve a~f ahethea- the operatiore cncteid Leyad the area of the cxaporate limits of the City of Partin Cucatocerp. "8.3Q.020 Permit Imouired for Taxicab 3etyiaa. "It shall Ue unlawful far arty person to eap9e in th@ busLees a1 opetatirg cr' caveirg to ha operated any taxicab service within the City of ]mndio CucamvrJa, wittnut having a p¢mit to m eo ruder tae porviaiora of this QepRer. "8.30.030 Amriratm fcs- Taxicab gor~rf~ Permit. "(a) My person desirirg to obtain a permit to ope¢ate a taxicab service order this d~apter shall sutnit a written application to the nami"i~tive services Dire~T.ar, an an applicatim fcsm provided LY Lhe NL"ini a*+-"tive SexVicas Director. npplicationa shall he signed urrM perolty of perjury std stroll mrtain the folla+ing informatim: "(1) Name, residence address and teleptnne nmtbe¢ of the appli®nt. "(2) Busltta@s name, aid~hiess std talepticrre nmb~ of ttre applicant. ^(3) tRmbe2' of vehicles to ba apmated tadrr the permit. ^(4) ills IDlker tYP@r year, rmtufac.'tiaffi', Mid passager BBatltg of the vehicles to be used by the applicant. "(5) the p2apoaed oolm er3reoe, insignia m cRhm diatlrrnil ah~fil@ CiNr3CC8riatiCe Of the taXi[ab t0 be UB@d, irfcliidiry tae type of illumitmted sign to ba mormhed m the tap of the vehicle std legerd ttrrem. "(6) >':Videtrce of public liability ireia~ams ad' rqt lase than $1 milliar far each p~sm ]tilled ar iniraed and rot lees ttan $i million Par Orditarlpe tlo. 501 Page 3 death ar injury of airy two (2) ar mare persons in airy ore aocidei~t, and for damage to property of at least $1 million from airy ore (1) ~;.~. "(7) Iegal and segistered P of tM vehicles W lae used by the applicant. "(s) Prior' e.~erisxx! of the applicant in the taxicab Lusiress including the details of any Friar denial, revocation ar suspensim by airy public agency of any tacicab service ar taxicab driviiq permit, licaae ar certificate. "(9) All felary oonvi.ctiona of the applicant and of all pmeons having an ownership inteisst in the piapesed taxicab eervlw far the Faevious five (5) years. "(10) 3iates to be t3reig~ to the public thraghout the tezm of any permit issued. "8 30 040 I i co,,,ice it, "Uprn the furnishing of all t27n lnformetion requinad by section 8.30.030 and payment of the i'ecpticed fee u>der this Qrapter, the City CUaicll shall issue the appli®t~t a Ta~dcab Setvioa Pezmit if thm applicm~t is ih under thatha pewisiore ofthis~ there acs m graade fcr da~ini oS thm permit Q;apt~• Atq+ app]S~arrt dsrSed a permit shall be given written rotice of the censoris far the denial. "8.30.050 Qoiai3a Poi' Da.inl ar neyp®tirn M Tavirah ce.,,;.e m....;r "(a) Taxicab Service ]~mita stall )xi denied ar revoked an the folloiing grounds: "(3) FBiha'e to mai„r,.i,. vw,islg. in goad end safe order and Sn cmpliance with all leis. this QaptBr. "(2) Any Palse stat®ent made on an application submitted radar "(3) Parlors to pay any Pees as required order rtiia tlaptea•. permit holderc•s(~i ~oP~the trait gcrilaws oft t2~a C~i ~ the pexmittee ar the ty, wmty ar state. "(5) Hoployirg oP a driver rdro does rot taw a valid Taxicab Drivers Pmmit order the cegtilsemmrts of this CYapter. "(6) Violation of arty of the pcwisiare oP this Qapter by the permit holder. "(7) Qaigirc~ rates in mama of tla nmounta stated in the permit application. ~~ orainaroe t7o. 501 rays < ^(&) Convictim of a felmy within five (5) years of the date of application wM.ce suds felay imolved fraud or disMnesty Ly the applicant with raspxk to any member of the public, or a3nere any taxi awned ar operated i3' the applicant was used in oam~ection with the Sian of slob felmy. ^8.30.060 Permit flees. "~Y P~ gxJa91+9 ~ ~' carrYSnl an the busintess of taxic:eb sexviae, cr engaged in the activity of driving a taxicab, shall, pay an aural permic fee as established by zesolution of the City Caacil. taequix'ed fees shall be paid at the time of applicatim Por a permit is subaittea under this Q~aPher• "FVnsy permit issued order ttils cTapter stall ra.,^c.^.re at the e~iratim of arB (i) year frrm the data of its isaustxg napless revoked prior to said terminatim. AnY zl of a permit imued order this Chapter stall be pn[siant to the same regniremarts, pr~oce:Ases, provisions and regulations set forth in this Ctapter far an original permit. A pa9on inlding a Tmdcab service Permit ~Y not drive a taxicab wittnut oleo paseeeaing a Taxicab Driver's Permit. Permits ismred order this Chapter may not be transferred to any other pesaon. ^8.030.070 ~!~ {v =• if, "It Ball ba unlawtal fa any par>9an to aooept any 1?~g~ in a taxi off otherwise provide txarnepartatim estvicee by taxi. begimin3 in the City of ~o Cucamonga without MvLg a Tardcab Drivers Permit to do eo urrlac tta proviaiore of this Chtipter. ^8.30.080 Amlimtian fob a Taxicab Aivar•s Plen^~ . "(a) 7my permm desiring to obtain a Taxicab ~iver•e Permit stall sutmit a written application to the nr]ministretive Servioae Director. ga applicatim stall provide reyueeted iMarmatian, under penalty ~ 1~aY, m applicatim fm~ms supplied by the 7dminiatrative Services Dlrechg regarding the following: " 1) Pertinenrt pecsaal data affi Class 3 driver's lioensa Saauad bf the State of California. ion of a valid ^(2) Physical oonlitim affecting driving ebility. "(3) Driving reuad for three (3) years prior t0 application including, but not limited to, any a~ all ovnickiaB oP airy provinima M the California Vehicle Code. ^(4) The date and rwtrae oP any end all csimiml convictiarn oP the applicant f~ the previous five (5) ymrs. "(5) sum®sy of m~lerca 1n driving motes vehicles, taxim aM/~ other vehicles Los hire. / 1 Ordinance No. 501 i~ s "(6) ~e rye and address of the taxicab service by Mridr the applicant trill be employed. "Fade r;.a,.~ shall provide a passpm-t size photnc~aptt and be fingerFsL~Ysd by the son Bea~rardim oamty 3rerifP's office atd a ¢imtra7 xecozds atierJc shall be ocrductJed m the applicant. The applicant will ba zequired to pay the Sheriff's established fats f¢ audr servi~a in addition to toe Taxicab Driver's Permit fee. A driver obtaining a permit renerai need rot be fimo ~r171i'Bd aId ptloTog-dptYad if fhE 91EIiff ante.,~i,m t21at ~dl i8 rot necessary far permitting PaP~s• "8.030.090 Qauds f¢ D"nial ¢ Revacatim of Tavsca_,t Drivec's Per"!it. "(a) taxicab Driver's F'ecmits shill be denied ¢ revoked m the following gruads: "(1) The permm does not possess a valid Class 3 driver's license issued by the State of f~lif¢nia. "(2) The persm has been cvrrvicted of a ¢ims within five (5) years tdtidr irnolved: ^ (a) fraud ¢ di~mesty with respect to arty member of the public; "(b) ~iVirg rarile order the influer~ of aladnl ¢ ~i "(c) injrsies to arty of the public as a result of such pezsaNS opetatim of a taxi. "(3) The peasonr has been ettfvicted f¢ driving a taxicab recJclessly within the p¢ecediig two (2) years. "(4) Repeated and persistent violatiare of the traffic law as the City, CamtY ¢ State. "(5) Orivig any taxicab the driver kenrr or should haw )mown was mt in good ardor and repair. "(6) False sta*m^~a n®de m an appliratim eutmitted uMler this . "(7) Violatim of arty of the prorisim oP this Qtiipter. "(ej Ctarging arty perecn more than the established rate f¢ taxicab service. ^(9) The permm ie required to register order Sectim 290 of the Penal Cbde of the state oP C'alifonrie. ^8.30.100 Issuance of Taxicab Driver's Aexmit. l~ Ordira7loe No. 501 Page 6 "Zf the City Wmcil, cs its designee, fads that the applicant is ~Y qualified, in oooplia7xe with the pcovisims of this a7d there are ro gmsds for denial, the applicant shall ba issued a Tatdc:ab Driver's Hermit. Any applicant denied a permit shall ba given written tlotice oP the reasQis for the denial. Permits shall remain the proierty of the City of Farxdn CuceIDOtY~d a7d are not trarsferable to airy other driver. A permit shall bQ asr0der+ed t0 the city by t11e d[lver upm sudl driver ceasing t0 etrgage 171 the activity of a taxicab driver. Tl1e Tardcab ~i~er's Permit stall set forth the driver's dame and wt¢king addre_as. The permit shall bear the driver's pic~hse and shall ba displayed while the driver is operating the taldcab eo as to at all times be easily visible in the pnsgager's o®pertmerlt of the taxicab. "Upm payment of all requilad fees, sulmittal of rile required applicatim and pxaoP of ompletiin OP Pirg¢lsi.rtim a7d ptlotographi7g, the City Casxil, m its desigres, shall issue a T~rl' Tmdcab diver's Peneit while shall be valid for uP to sixty (60) days i1 the applicant oeztifiea under penalty of perjury that there are ro greeds far derryLy the applicant a pezmit order the prwisims of section 9.30.090. A Ttmpmary Taxicab Driver's termifatim to 1 ~ ~ a~ «~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ittar rotificatim of by the City aare.,^c„~ that ~~ s Permit is an investigation gtorade far datlal of a permit exists order Sectim 8.30.090. Any T~potary Permit stall out®tically teiml7ate upon the iamlanoe of a regular Tex[cab l>civer'a Permit to the applicant after the c~letim oP the St7a'itf's i7lvestigetiin. ^6 30 110 r ire" "Arty persal denied a permit Ras~arrt to this Chapter ~Y appeal to the City wlarcil in writicg, stating reesare wiry the permit should be grand-ed. The City Caux:il mfr ter appeals directly ar in its sole dis¢etion may appoint a hearing officer to hear any appeal and make a reo~erdatim to the City oamcil. Upm leoaipt oP a timely, written request for appeal, the City Council shall set a hearing to ooas within forty-five (45) days, betc¢e said Caslcil ce desirgated hearing officer. The City Oaasil shell render a declaim witt1371 thirty (30) days of the oinclvsion of said hearing. ^9.30.120 Pexocatlm Of P~^i a ^tio permit iAeued order this Chapter shall be revoked untLl 7fotice is provided and a hearing to determine whettwr there are grvade fm r'evOCat.ittl shall hays bear bald befaae the City Caacil or in the Council's sole al~rcm before a heating officer appointed by the City Courx;il to beer the appeal arcs make a taxsmadetim to the Caroll. Notice of sudl hearitfg stall ba giver in writing and served at ].met tar (10) days prier to the date as the hearing therein. The rotloe shall state the greeds of the ocaplairlt acpi7st the holder of sudt permit, arc] shall deeigtate the time std plans wrens eudl hearing will lea bald. said rotice stall be saved upon the permit holder by delivering the same personally m by leaving sorb notice at the place as buaifaes or z+eeide7xe oP the permit raider. ]n the evert the permit holder carvlot ba read, e7d thn eezviae of sorb rotice carrot be ot2atvise made in 7~ Cafltitlai~re No. 501 page 7 Postage fully prepaid, addressed to thesudi notice shall be mailed, certified p¢mit holder at his ar her place oP businness ar residetae at least ten (10) days priar to the date of suds hearing. ~e desicioe of the City Cotmcil shall be final. This Q~apter matt be enforced by the Shariff of San Bernardino Coutdy. !'8.30.130 FSSam~Fi~, "ibis Chapter shall tnt apply to public tcaropartatirn service being performed piu:a~atnt to a cvrtract with the City of Ratr3» Cucammga ar any other public etrtity in this State, ^8 30 140 Time f r Caoolisrro t., c~.; ct' m,, !. c .t..,... _ "Any taxicab service ar taxicab driver perfuming service within the City rn the affective date of this Chapter shall have sixty (60) days ft® the effective date of this Chaptar to obtain permits rernilxed hereutdar. "9.30 150 7ty f Viol"i'ion. "(a) ~iminal Violation "It shall be unlawful far sty P~'son. Lira, , or ccaparatirn to vio]ate any provisirn ar to fail to or~ly wi the tc+rn~+irmv~Fo Of this Chapter. Any persm, Lirm, par'trt<2eitlp, ar ate violating any pmvisirn of this gapter ar failing W ocnply with any of its z'e9uir'ecents shall be deed guilty of a misdemea~xs std rrjxan aarvickSrn theme shall be punished by a fine mt exc:aedirg Ct~e 'Jinuaand Dollars ar b( iapz•i~..ro,.+ not e~+eeding six mmths, ar by both such fine and i~risorm~rt. Eadt sudn person, firm, partrxa:ship, ar oarparation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offettae far satin and every day ar any pcrzti.m thereof during whidr sty violation of arty of the prwisiore of this Chapter 18 ccmmittad, continued ar paradtted b/ eudi parson, firm, pertrrarehip, ar wrparatim, std shall ba deemed punishable therefore as pravidad in this ~Ptar'. "(b) Civil Remedies Available "A viaLatim of any of the pmvisiorm of this Chapter shall ott~stitute a rarisama and may be abated by the City throttcjt civil prvcese by means of resCainircl order, Fn-elimirrary ar permattent injunctirn, ar in any other mermen provided by law for abat®ent of sudt nrisarre." Sectirn 2: If any sectirn, eubsectirn, aetiiterca, clause, phrased, ar portirn of this Otsiirmnroe is far any reaeorn deemed ar held to ba itnnalid ar iamtstitutional by the decision of any oast of ampetetrt jurisdiction, sudn decisirn shall rot affect the validity of the remaining paatim or this Chdinanxn. The City Carncil of the City of Ratt<ip CucemQga hereby declares `7 Z fhr,i r,anrn NO. 501 Page 8 that is Would have adopked this ocdir~arr_a and eadt eeetion, auheectim, ~~• ~~. P~ or P~tio<, tt,eceof, irieepective oY the fad that arty one ~ ~.t: aectiore, eubeectias, sentenoae, cla„ees, Phrases, or aitl,et pottims mtcfie ~,r. ~.,m.«,y pe aeclarea irnalta or ra~nenstttutioenl. a~a I~yir shall sign shim aairar,oe and the city cleric ahnll cause the same to be published within fifteen (]5) days after its peeeege at least one in Rhe Inlmd ttev itv R~+, a newspe~ of ge~al cixw7atim published in the city of Ctrtdrio, ratiiti,..,i,., arri ciitarlated in thn city of Imr~o ar®orga, callfania. 73 (73132IIrtiCE to soz Ax amutnezB of ~ Cimsr wc>r~cu. of a~ crt7r of RAtifiA QX'lflAX.A, 7A, AUifIItIZIIi~ '1HE LEVY OP A cow-rat. TAX W AN II43iPIH~@7P AItFA OF AN F7QSfIlTG CY2TtIxJTIY FAC]I ITIFS DL4IItI['.1' ~h5, the City (huncil of the City of Itatr3to Cucemage, California {the "City Dws~cil"), has initiated Fi'o®edirge, held a public hearirtq, cad,xts] an electim and xewived a favorable vote frv the qualified electors relatitq to the levy of an additiotml special tax in an improveuertt area within an ex+^tt.,~. oomma:ity facilities dletrict, bei7g Ct~mity Facilities District No. 91-1 (Virtsia amity) of the City of Raixiq ~rR (the "District"), all as authorized purettattt to the terms aid pravsims of the ^Nello-idoos C>mmadty Facilities Act o! 1982", being 2.5, Part 1, Divisim 2, Title 5 of the C,ovatitmaft code of the State cf California (lt¢~eirmfter referred to ae the ^ACG^) • ails ir¢sW®att area shall haeiimfter ba referred to as II~NE}@7f Aim IA. 1 CH+ C~?lI2IITY FAC~.ITI2•S D73112IQ ND. 91-1 (VI(3Q27A (r!lR~II1Y) CH+ a~ Cl7R C&r RANClD Q]CATlIit'~ (hmeitafter raferr'ect to ae the ^laptovematt Area"); ard, ROW, am:g~, the City naatcil of the City of Rarx3n (UCa®aap herety ordaitre as follows: SELTICN 1: amt the shoos recitals are all true std axrect. SFl.TICN 2: amt this legislative body does, by the pmea:le oP this Chdirmme, authorize the levy of additional epeaial tawes at the rate ad formrla as set forth in Hdilbit "A^ attached hereto, referenced std so vxxn.-pcsated. SRCI2CN 3: scat this legislative body is hereby further authorizes, by Resolution, to determine the specific special tax rate std amatnt t4 be levied for the that asrettt tax year or fubae tax years, etQept that the special tax rate to ba levied shall sot eteoeed that as est Parch above, but the special tax may be levied at a lar~ rate. SELTLCIi 4: Prnpertiss ar attities of the State, Federal or other local gova<~atta shell, exc'apt u oFlterwisa provided in Section 53317.3 a'f the GOVplrmatt Code Of the State Ot California, be e]0®[Jt $® the above- referared std appovved special tax. SECPICN 5: a:e proceeds of ttc above avtltarized and levied spacial tax may Only be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costa of the followiig, in the follo.~irg coder of priority: 1. Paytratt oP principal of std interest on cry outetaidirtg avttvrized hQrled indebtednees of the District. 2. Newesary replatistmertt of bard reeerw ltaris ~ other reserve fatda; ~y aaai~,u,oe rw. soz Page 2 3. Payma7t of costs a7d elglenees of authorized public facilities, savicea, a7d i.,r.t~r.r.r.7 ~~ p~~ to the 11ct; 4. flepnylee77t oP adva7lcis girl laa7m, as apprgsiate. 'Bm proceeds of t11e special tax shall be levied only eo lag as Healed fa' its g¢lxae, a7d shall rot be used far my other purpcee. SDCPIQi 6: 'II]e above authorized special tax shall be mllected ir1 the same 70airlBr' as acdixmy ad valarmt ta7ws are m7tor+d 871d shell be subject to the soma peneltim a7rl the same pcooed7ca, sale a7d lia7 priority 171 Cage Ot ,inl ir~e~wv it M i8 p~OVjdBd !aC ad ValOt® ta7Q19. SI~ION T 11n above authorized epeclal tmc shall be sensed by the lied iapoeed purm7arlt to Sectiaro 3114.5 a7rl 3115.5 02 the Streets a7d Fiicfaays Coda of the State of chl.ifotnia, uhlob liar et1e11 bs a oanti7uirlg lied std shall sea7ze eeC31 levy c2 the special tax. 7l1e lien ae the special tax shall omtilrle 1n force a7d effect ut7til tics special tmt abligetim is prepaid, permeleltly aetiafied std aelcal].ed in aaxcdm7oe with 8ectim 533N of the GoV~7mmd Code OL the State dl' dtifr.wta Q until the special ta7t assess m ba levied by fife laJlalatiVm 60t1y ~ ttfe looel llgsxy in fir s7rlec provided in 9ectim 53330.5 of said iiouertamlt Odds. SA3'ION 8: 'lt1L OiditWlOe a7d special tax etlell be applifa*~~ faC the xeferenaed District, es veil as airy futla:e anuxatims. 513 9: This Ocdinmlo! etmll i» affective thirty (30) days after its adnptim. fPil3rin tiftea7 (15) days attar its adoptial, the City Clezic shall calms this Rtlftmrrca to be publidlad in a na+spaper of getlral nier»latim in ~! 71IIN•D VAIS$Y alII3 HIIIEfIIi pucsta77t t9 the ptwisiar pt GoVCl7maiG C17de SeCtiOR 36933. 11114i000C'» 11[D FIP9f ItIDiD at a rslttlar msatilq of the City O01xIC.i.1 of the City of Iiaz1ChD Qtcaavgnr flll.ifmtla, rn 9eptabs 2. 7992) 1110 10t8IIAFil1t l1oCQ19D at a regular rasatttg of the City Caacil of the City of Pei1dID ~rN, QllifCrtlid, held al tLa 16tlt dey ~ r 1992, by the folLovi7g vote: ~7 B~. ~ Page < June I5, 1992 EXHIBIT D RATES AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL. TAXES FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILTTIES DISTRICT NO. 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A Special Tax, the "Special Tax(es)" (defined below), shall be applicable m each Parcel (defined below) located in improvement Area No. 1 of Community Facilities District No. 91.1 (Victoria Community) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hacinafta "Impmvemem Area No. 1" and "CFD No. 91-1"). The amount of Special Tax m be collected from each Parcel in any Fiscal Year (defmcd below) shall be determined in accordance with the rate oral method o[ apportionment described below. AB of the property m improvement Arcs No. t unless exempted by law or Secdon F below, shall be taxed for the purpous, to the extent, ertd in the manna provided herein A. DEFINITIONS "Assessor's Parcel Map" means en official map of the County Assessor of the County of San Bcmatdino designating Parcels by Assessors Pareel Number. "Developed Property" means, as of July 1 of any Fiscal Year, all Parcels for which a final subdivision map, parcel trap or functionally equivalent map or instrument creating lots or parcels Cor commercial and industrial developmem or creadng lots or parcels upon which residential units may be conswcted haz been recorded prior to Masch 1 of the preceding Final Year. "Exempt Property" means any Parcel or ether property within Improvement Area No. 1 described vt Section E which is exempt from the levy of the Special Tex. ~~ 9D8C~/Exhibit D Oxrirrrarre No. 502 Page 5 June /S, !992 "Fiscal Year" means [hc period starring on July 1 of any year and ending the following June. 30. "Full Buildaut" means the Fiscal Ycar in which all Taxable Property within Improverncnt Arca Ne. 1 is classi£al as Developal Propcrry for purpoxs of levying the Special Tax. "Net Taxable Acre" means an acre of Developed Property a UMeveloptA Property, exclusive of property exempted by law or the provisions of Section F below from the Special Taz; the acreage calculation for Developed Property will be bazW on Ne dimensions az shown on or calculated tram the ttwrded Fmel subdivision mep, parcel reap, a funedonally equivalent map or instrtrmrnG the acreage calculation far UrMeveloped Property shall be the acreage shown on or calculated from the Assessor's Parcel Map. "Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessors Pazcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Pa«el number as of the date of the levy of the Spwial Taxes for each Fiscal Year. "Special Tax Requirement" means that amoum requircA in any Fiscal Year to pay: (;) debt service on all Rends or other indebtedness of the District, (2) costs incurred by the City in the annual lery and collection of the Special Taxes, (3) other «asonable costs related to the administration of the Bonds, and (4) any amounts required to replenish any reserve funds established in association wish the 3onds. In calculating the Special Tax Requirement for a Fiscal Year items (q through (4) shall be net of bond «serve earnings and other in[erest earnings described in the bond resolution for the Bonds reasonably expected to be available, except those earnings that may be requital for rebate purposes. ~~ 92-BNExhibic D C4ddrurtcs No. 502 Pegs 6 June 15,1992 "Special Tax(es)" means the Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on all Parcels to fund the Specal Tax RegttiremenL "Taxable Property" means all Petals in Impmvemen[ Area No. 1 which arc not exempt from the lery of Special Taxes pursuant to law a Section E below. "Undeveloped Property" means all Parcels in Improvement Area No. 1 which arc not classified as Developed Property or Exempt Pmperry. B. ASSIGNMENT TO TAX CLASS For each Fiscal Year, all Perak within Lnprovement Area No. 1 shall be classified either as Developed Property, Undeveloped Property, or Exempt Property and shall be subject m the levy of the Specie: Tax in aaortlance with the rates and tnethad of apportionment set Corth in Secfions C and D below. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX .RATES i. Developed Property The Maximum Special Tax for tech Parcel of Developed Property shag be 510,000 per Net Taxable Acre. 2. Undeveloped Property Thc Maximum Special Tax Cor each Parcel of Undeveloped Property shall be 58,600 per Net Taxable Acte. ~~ 92-86/Exhibit D Oidinartcx No. 502 Page 7 June l5, 1992 D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAXES On or prior to Augus[ I of each Fiscal Year or such other date as e,ay he established by law, the Special Tax Requirement for such Fiscal Year shall 6e determined and the Special Taxes Inicd as follows: Seen 1 • The Special Taxes shall be levied on all Parcels of Developed p[operty at 100 percent of the Mnzimum Special Tax Rate; however, if this amount exeeedx the Special Tax Requirement, the Icvy of Special Taxes on ail Parcels of Developed Property shall be proportionally decreased until the revenues produced thereby will !z equal to the Special Tax Requvtment. Stco 2: If the revenues which rosy be produced by levying the Special Tex pursuant to Step 1 are less than the Special Taz Requirement, the Special Taxu shat] be levied proportionally on all Pamds of Undeveloped Property up to 100 percent of Ne Maximum Special Tax Rave m produce aggrtgate revenues equal ro the Special Tax Requitetnen[. E. EXEMPTIONS A Special Tax shall no[ be levied on the Collowing properties which may as of the date of formation of Improvemrnt Area No, 91-I be: Progenies owned by state, federal, or other local governments, except as otherwise provided in Section 53317.3 oC the Government Code; Property within Improvement Area No. 1 which is dedicated for the pu[poses of conswcting CFD funded road facilities; 92-86/Exhibit D Oedirwrr~o No. 502 Page 8 June I5. 1992 Property within Improvement Area No. 1 to be dedicatrd to or owned by the Southern California Edison Company, the ux of which is limited m utility Purposes. Thox Patcds at entry ways and along perimeter areas used for landscaping which are dedicated to and maintained b~~ the City. Notwithstanding the above, Parcels or portion of Parcels conveyed or ivevocably offered for dedication to a public agency after fortmdon of Improvemen[ Area No. 91-1, and not otherwise exempt pursuant to this Section E, shall bo subject to the levy of the Spacial Taxes pursuant to Section 53317.3 or Section 53317.5 of the Government Code and classified as Undeveloped Property. F. MANNER OF COLLECTION Except for the prepayment of Special Taxes as provided for herein, the Special Taxes shall be collected in the same manner and at the same tune as ad valorem properly taxes, provided; however, thaz the City Council may authorize the collection of delinquent Special Taxes by judicial foreclosure proceedings pursuant to Section 53356.1 of the Government Code. G. PREPAYMENT AND SATISFACTION OF SPECIAL TAX OBLIGATION The Special Tax obligation for a Net Aae of Developed Property and Undeveloped Property may be prepaid and permanently satisfied by the owner as follows: 1. Prepayment Prior to Full Buildout The amount to discharge the Special Taz obligation of any Net Taxable Acre of Developed Property or Undeveloped Property within the Improvement Area prior to Full Buildou[ shall be (i) Ne remaining bond principal outstanding, plus (ii) any premium required to be 92-66/Exhibit D g (~ avd,tanoa Ho. sot Page 9 June J5, 1992 paid on the payoff date for all ouutanding bonds, Tess (iii) the Bond Reurve Fund, muldplied by 1.15, divided by the total Net Taxable Acres N the Improvement Area. The amowt dmvcd on a Net Acreage basis shall be multiplied by 1.15 to deteradoe the payoff amowt on a Net Acreage basis for DcvclopW Property and 1.0 to determure the payoff amount cn a Net Acreage basis for Undeveloped Property. 2. Prepayment After Full Buildout The amowt to discharge the Specie! Taz obligation of any Net Acre of Developed Yroputy or Undeveloped Property wittdn the Improvement Area after Full Btrildou[ dull be (i) the remaining bond principal ouutanding, plus (u) any premium required to be paid an the payoff date for aB outstanding bonds, kss (iii) the Bond Reserve Fwd muttipBed by 1.13, dividW by the coral Nn Acres in the Improvemen[ Area Notwithstanding the foregoing, no prepayment shall be made on any Parcel of property in Improvement Area No. 1 until such time as no mac Bonds will be iuued by the Ciry [or improvement Area No. 1, as determined by the Cotmcil. 92-86Bxhibit D '~ r,i5 Page •.s In1~eh~ion al~~I O~a.~.~( QZ CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMOFGA STAFF REPORT ,_ DAJE: September 16, 1992 T0: :day or and Menbers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller City Pianner BY: Scot^_ Murphy, Ass oriate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-37 - CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES, INC• - An appeal of conditions of iup royal pertaining to the awning color and design and the landscaping Eoc Conditional Use Permit 91-77, a request to construct a 7,275 square foot fast food restaurant (with dcive-thru) within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial designation of the Terra Vista Planned Community located at the southeast cor r.er of Milliken Avenue an3 Base Line Road - APN: 227-151-21. Tree Pia nning Commission recommends that the City Council deny the appeal of condt ;zoos of. approval Eor Conditional Use Perm it 91-37 [h rou gh adopt On of the attached Resolut inn. BACRG Rf%JND: On July 22, and August 12, 1992, the Pia nn ing Commission conducted public hearings to review the plans for the proposed Carl's Jr. fast food restaurant within Centta] Pazk P1a za (Ra lph s' Center) at the southeast corner of Milliken and Base Llne Road. After concluding the pubLc hearings, the Commission approved the application subject to a mamher of conditions, two of which are now being appealed by the a rep :: cant. The E1rs[ nondit ion involves the color and design of the .awnings proposed for the restaurant. The applicant is proposing to u'.iitze the Carl's Jr. wtFOrate cn lors of red and yellow for the aw~:.n gs. The Comm~iss;.on fn.lt than these wlors were unacceptable in t'na^. rh.Py aze not consistent with the cclors of the shopping center (pre man iy e.a rth tones and soft pastels )• similarly, the Commission 3e !e rm U~,nd ghat ehe lest 9.1 of the awnings was inconsistent with the ';enter 9esign. The awnings sperif icalLy identified were the awnings over the en!ries. The Comm is siren felt that the tr i.an gu lac awnings p rnnosed were not in proportion to the building plans and that the half- r~nmd awnt ngs used within the center would bring about the consistency of de_s.gn an3 proportion desired Eoz the building. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AFPEAL COP 91-37-KAACHER September 15, 1992 Pa oe 2 Fs a point of information, no awnings were proposed for the recently approved Carl's Jr. at the southwest corner of Foothill and Day Creek Boulevards. TF.e second condition being appealed by the applicant centers around the requi remen'_ to install trees flanking the drive-thru exit (see Exhibit "C"•1 The applicant states ir. his letter of appeal that [he site exceeds the City standards and, thsrefore, the trees are not required. The Planning Commission, however, did not place this requirement on the proposal to address City requirements. Rather, the Commission noted tr:at the location of the sidewalk and the extension of the eave on the east side of the building did not allow Eor the placement of trees necessary to soften the building elevation facing the parking area. The Commission noted that the area around toe drive-thru exit would allow for placement of trees in order to address their concerns. Staff has suggested the use of Queen palms to provide the vertical growth adjacent to the building while minimizing any sight vis •bi lity concerns. The trees are used elsewhere within the center. Respec 1y sub d, Bra Huller City Planner BH:SM: js Attachmen CS: Exhibit "A" - Latter OE Appeal (dated August 14, 1992) Exhibit "B" - Addendum to Letter of Appeal (dated August 24, 1992) Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Aeport (dated July 22, 1992) Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission No. 92-106 Exhibit ".. -Planning Commission Minutes/July 22,1992 Exhibit "F" - Pla nninq Conmission Minutes/August 12,1992 Resolution Denying Appeal V~ eF F.~yr NG C~..a ~, n•..~ ~ PiP NNiNG ~'V!S!0`. ~ "~ AUG 171992 AY v 718191A~1~31415~ C2tr1'seTr. _,~~...~~.__ --ate- s.z sc_r~ ~._ __.._.~~~ . ~:, e. _.. - . - - ..;.- - ...: .-_ August 14. 1992 Mr. Scott Murphy City of Rancho Cucamenga P.O. Ftox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: PROPOSED CARL'S JR. RESTAL7tA1VT CENTRAL PARK PLA7,A BASELEYE & !1~IILLQCEN E.A. & C.U.P.91-37 RANCHO CL'CA.~fONGA, CA CKE M194-082 Dear Scott: Please let this letter serve as official appeal of Conditon Number 2, Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 91-37. This condition specifically denies the shape and colors proposed. Due to the impulse nature of the "quick service" customer we are trying to serve, it is imperative that we be allowed use of shapes and colors that are a major part of our corporate identity. I ask that we be scheduled for the next available meeting before City Council I have attached a check for $126.00 to cover the filing fee. Please call me at 7I4-491-4351 if you have any questions or require additional information. Thank you. Sincerely. CARLKARCHERENTERPRISES I, nzo A.IZey Site Development A1anager lar:brs rccupap1.892 cc: Lewis Humes DS AUK 2„ ~~ '~t9f10~141Zj112~g~415 ~.,~ _. a..y De,P!ec^~z ! ?22 3^„r^ Harpc~ Sow=~:aro • p0 9oT ".398 drgrq -. ,a 929-'3 . _ __ ~~,,r August 24, 1992 Mr. Scott Murphy City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: PROPOSED CARL'S 1R. RESTAURANT CENTRAL PARK PIA7A BASELINE & MILLIXEN E.A. & c.u.P. 91.37 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA cKE tY194-082 Dear Scott As an addendum to my letter dated August 14, 1992, I would also like to appeal Condition Number I?, Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 91-37. It is our opinion that the proposed landscaping alreadv exceeds your city standards and that the addition of any trees will detract from the we!I thought out plan already submitted. Please call me at 714-491-4351 if you should have any questions or require additional information. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, CARL KARCIIER ENTERPRLSFS I`,aunzo A. Rye Site Developm~tft Manager lar:brs rcappeal.Ei92 cc: Lewis Elomes g~ ~rar 'e „ CITY" OF RANCHO CLCA':v10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner By: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUED EC T: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-37 CARL KARCHER FNTERPRI SES, iNC. - A request to construct a 3,275 square foot fast food restaurant (with drive-thru) within an ezistinq shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial designation of the Terra Vista Planned Comnun ity, located at the. southeast corner of Hase Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-151-21. PROJECT AND SITE DESCPIPTION: Ac t: nr. Request ed by Applicant: Approval of Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, building elevations, and is auance of a Negs ties Declaration. Surroundrn Land Use and Zoning: Nor ti; - Vacant; Victoria Planned Community, Medium-High Residential (16-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Terra Vista PLa nn ed Community, Low-Medium Residential (4-9 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; Terra Viata Planned Community, Medium-Nigh Residential (14-26 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Townhouse project; Tetra Vista Planned Community, Office/Professional and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) 0. General Plan Designations: Project Srte - Neighborhood Commercial North - Low-Medium Residential (4-A dwelling units per acre) South - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwel Li nq units per acre) East - Medium-High Reai dential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) West - Nei ghhorhood Commercial D• Site Characteristics: The site was previously graded as part of the rough grading operation for the entire shopping renter. The satellite pad has been temporarily Landscaped until such time as the building is approved and bui ld'_nq permrts are issued. ~Xh~1b~1t "e„ PLANNLNG COI~4AISSION STAFF FE PORT CUP 9!-37 - CARL KARCHEA July 22, 1992 Page 2 i. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Tyne Square parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota~ Ratio Required Provided Fast Food Restaurant 3,275 1/75 4q yq+ * Provided through: reciprocal parking agreement for shopping center. P.NALYSIS: A. Background: On .Tune 27, 1990, the Plann.i ng Commission approved the Conceptual. Master Plan and Phase 1 Site Plan and elevations for Central Park Plaza. As part of the Master Plan, a fast Eood restaurant with drive-thru was shown at the location of the p ropoaed Carl's Jr. Subsequently, a portion of phase 1 (Ralph's and retail stares) has been completed. As a conditior. of approval of the original Conditional Uae permit, satellite pads depicted on the Master Plan require separate review and approval by the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission. H. General: The applicant is proposing to construct a 3,275 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-thru facility fronting onto Milliken Avenue, just north of the main entry drive. The plans for the restaurant include a drive-thru lane with stacking available for 6 vehicles and outdoor seating with ehlldren'c play equipment (i.e., ball crawl). Design Review Committee; The Desi qn Review Committee !McN ie 1, Melcher, Kroutil) has reviewed the plans Eor the proposed drive- thru facility on two separate occasions. The initial plans reviewed by the Cormittee oriented entries toward the north parking area and toward Milliken Avenue. The drive-[h ru lane was proposed between the building and Milliken Avenue and between the building and the shopping center entry driveway to the south. The Con®itiee recommended that revisions be incorporated into the plans to address the fallowing comments; The landscaping and wall along the drive-thru lane, plus the slight grade differential, was not adequate to screen the stacking area. Alternatives should 6e enplored by the applicant. The Loadi.nq area proposed was not acceptable because delivery trucks would park in the main drive aisle (along the east side of the building), thereby obscuring vehicle_ traffir,. The loading area and service entry relationship should be re-evaluated. ~8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-37 - CARL KAACY.ER Suit 22, 1992 Page 3 3. The use of the quarter-round awning appeared "added-cr." and should be removed. d. The east elevation (service area) should Ge enhanced to create a more acceptable design facing the activity of the center. 5. The drive-ihru canopy needs to be more integrated into the design cf the building and the center. The pre-cast columns, consistent with the center, was a stop in the right direction. 5. The awning color should be evaluated with the redesign. Subsequently, the applicant submitted the revised plans for review by the Design Review Committee (see attached Exhibits). While not reviewing the plans in detail, the Committee (McNiel, Melchec, Kroutil) felt that the changes made provided for a better design but they expressed serious reservations about allowing a drive-ihru facility at this location. The Coranittee questioned whether or not a drive-ihru facility along Milliken Avenue was the appropriate land use. Additionally, the Committee felt that the loading for the facility was not adequately addressed. As a result, the Cosmittee could not zecomaend approval. Aather than continuing to make revisions to the plan, the applicant has requested that the project be scheduled foY the Planning Commission to discuss these issues. Dzr ve -ihru Policy: In May, 1988, the Planning Convnisaion adopted interim desi qn goals and policies For businesses with drive-ihru facilities (see Exhibit "F"). During the discussion and formation of policies, the Burger King facility at Base Line Road and Haven Avenue was beiny processed through the various Committees. As a result, many of the goals and policies contained in the Resolution were implemented at the Burger King site. Wni le the U-aheped design minimized visibility of the drive-thru lane from Haven Avenue, other concerns surfaced about the pedestrian and Vehicular circulation. As a result, the drive-ihru policies continue to be a source of discussion. With the recent submittal of five drive-ihru facilities, the discussion has increased dramatically in the past two months. AS a cesu lt, staff is requesting the Commission provide direction for this dti ve-ihru Eacili ty and Future submittals as they relate to the interim policies. In considering the current submittal, [he PLanninq Comniss ion shculd consider the following: 1. The interim policies state that the drive-ihru lane shall be screened through building orientation and the use of a combination of low screen walla, heavy landscapiny, and trail is work. 8~ PLANN LNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-37 - CARL KARCHER duly 22, 1492 Page 4 2. The applicant is proposing to orient the drive-thzu lanes parr llel to Mi liiken Avenue and the entry drive. 3. The drive-ihru lane will 6e slightly above the grade of the e r.try drive, at rough iy the same grade as MiLlik en Avenue at the southern portion of the site, and below the grade of Milliken Avenue at the northern end of the site. 4. The applicant is proposing to construct a 4-foot high solid wall with 4 feet of lattice work on top of the wall to screen the drive-ihru lane. Landscaping will be installed adjacent to the wall to supplement the existing landscaping installed with Phase 1. 5• No clearly designated loading area is shown with the submittal. The applicant hoe indicated that they will receive deliveries from smaller trucks that will not block the drive aisles. 6. Recent Planning Commission apptovale for drive-thru facilities have been for Locations generally below the street grade and where the stacking area is located to the side and rear of the bm lding (away from the stzaet). 7. The Design Review Committee recently reviewed a drive-ihru facility with the stacking area a1on4 a major arterial. This stacking area was slightly below the street grade and retaining/screen wa 11s were incorporated along the drive-ihru lane to screen *_he cars. This solution was found to be acceptable by the Design Review Committee. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: After having completed the Environmental Checklist, staff has determined that the proposed fast food facility will not have a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, if the Planning Commission approves the Conditional Use Permit, a Negative Declaration should also be issued. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve the Conditional Use Permit app Licatior., the following findings must be made: A. That the proposed use i9 in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and Terra Vista Planned Community, and the purposes of the district i.n which the site is located. B. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wi 11 not he detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious Co properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION oTAFF REPORT CUP 91-37 - CARL RARCHEP. Ju 1y 22, 1992 Page 5 ... That the proposed use complies with each of the app lioable provisions o£ the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public heaziny in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff re cos®ends that the Planning Commission receive all written and oral testimony on the proposed project. After receiving all information, there are two options available to the Planning Conn is Sion: ,. If the Coamiisaion feels there are sufficient facts to support the findings, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Approval subject to conditions requiring the final design to be consistent with zecent Commission action for a similar facility. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner; or 2• Zf the Commission can not support the findings, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at Cie next Planning Commission meeting. Respect iy sub. d, / Brad By,Y er City Planner BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F"' Site Plan for the Shopping Center Detailed Site Plan Landscape Plart Building Elevations Grading Plan Drive-thru In¢erin Design Goals and Policies ~/' '• I ,~ .... ~•~~•.wo o~:.o°iY. a rznn vuve nuiNa~ xaw Sus aurwnr~ue 0'J 1N3we013~30 SIM31 • i ~iYY •2..:.. .. y/ ' C • .. \ 1 ~. ..•, ./ ~.. \•.` ~~> ~ 3 ~i1 1 B •1, r.• '~,. .3 7 ~ _ _ ' ~. . "1:~1: --- 3eY X3M19T .. i. 92 ,I ~ I I ~_ '~ ~ ~~ i ~ -~ I 9 ~ r I tflAN5E0RYER I C of TRA$N '^ ~'i I I ~ ENCLOSURE --~ I I 0 ~ ~ 5 I ~I ~~ . I ~ '~I 1 ~ I i ` I i ~ ~', i ~ I~ \ ~ ~ ;uc vac I ~i I ~ "oRioc-TNRU" SICN 10 p^ F11[0 ~ ~ ~a wsuaE --~c ~P oNE I ~F11 CRY I Q~1111F MiF u I ~ I II I ~ Zy~~, o W i ' ~ I1 I I BOARD \ ~ ~ - of _ m i. I c"'f b-h ~~~ }'~~ppppp I ~---- - ~=~ i" i t u ~~ i I Z n_ 1 T 16'- " e:' S.S. I I h' CAM{ .111. A[{T{UII~NT ' _ ~ +-.4 v.~ son b I I ^I W Yale I q I > t I ~ 00 NOiIC d ~~ I I J 16N46 JAW ,~'. a~ p I X00 iJ N I I i. ;r.OPP.ryG ~:[v';R I P'.CR-uP WNpOw-~ Z \~iIGN ,,.RCIN Wv,l \\\\~~--!!~~//// ~ I flu".J NO Iv,' .'Ni (/ I r, f 1 ~ ~ ..+~%•~ I~ -IM~l1TM ~I 93 ~N~~~ t1~, - ~ :. . Exl$T. CIN hAYO MJM E %I$T. XYLOSMq COn EXIST. P;NU$CAN,- E%I$i. PNC]INIA FRA. GRDUNDCOVER/B NRUBS TVP ANNUAL COLOR TYP Exlsr. TURF NIGN SCREEN WALL - E%IST. CUPANIOP51$ ANA. Ex.Si. NANOINA OOM. nARROP DWARF Ex 6T.ARE CA$TRUM flOx~-_ Ex15 i. DRACNYC nITON POP, - ~ ~\ J \ _ ~-- ~- `. r I ~ _ \ _ ~. \~~ ~/ `~ NORTH iC A:E - 30' °I I o +o Xo .o SITE & LANDSCAPE 9N Gw~ M~1 ^~-Y7 ~.a+n~.~ ~t SN011~~313 •~%j S'~Mp'N~ ~ ~'~ JL~ c Z O F 7 W W f 6 H 6 O 2 O a J f W J 7 0 N 9S ~!i iii e:y ~:; ~~~ ^"'~R7e sNOUVn~3 .d~S.j~'~~I~~Jat fl; f~ e w ~ ° u ~ o ~ ~ O < 41 V ~ Q 7 ~ '^ W .f `I, t ~I _ ~~~ ~Eil it ffi~i ~~t as ~ 3i. ,ti. :i .as I. e. J ~ _ 9p OO Z Q J W C Q W 6 f N W E'XHiair 'o -z „ B ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / A ~ ~ 1 ~ i'. ~`. -~ ~\ ~.. ~ I ~ ~ i ^_. ~_ ~ --- - --•--ice ~ ~• ^ -_-_. 1 "' ~, _.- Y; 5EGTION 8-B •T~_ _..= BEGTION A-A ~ ~_ ^^ ,~ ~~ ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 88-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING INTERIM OES IGN GOALS ANO POLICIES FOR BUSINESSES WITH ORfVE-THRU fAC1LITIES WHEREAS, the Planning Comni ssion has expressed numerous concerns with businesses that have drive-thru facilities including, but nct limited to, fast food restaurants. The concerns are compatibility of use, circulation, and visual and aesthetic appearance. Previous projects have not adequately addressed these concerns, especially in the screening of the drive-thru lane; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a design goal for businesses with drive-thru facilities to guide future development; and WHEREAS, development standards and design guidelines are necessary to impt ement the design goal for businesses with drive-t hru facilities; and WHEREAS, such develo; nent standards and design guidelines are needed to provide clear direction and guidance to developers and staff alike. IION, THEREFORE, BE Ii RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish Snterim policies for hu sines ses with drive- thru facilities as follows: Section t: Goal Statement The intent of the guidelines is to assist the designer in understanding and complying with the City standards for building and site design. The goal is to provide high quality design, comps ti 6f lity of use, and mitigate environmental and aesthetic concerns that are created by th;s type of land use. The following design standards and guidelines shall aDPiy to uses with drive-thru facilities typically including, but not limited to, fast food restaurants, banks, mint-markets, dairy, photo kiosks, or auto service. Section 2: Development Standards Location - Uses with drive-thru facilities shall be 300 feet away from r.ny intersection and from another drive-thru facility on the same side of the street, except within a shopping center or Master Plan. Restaurants with drive-t hru facilities shall be a minimum of 200 feet away from any residential use or district 6ounda ry. q$ E"Y~i6y/ ~.~ " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU?ICN N0. ORiYE-TMRU INTERIM ' 'IGN GOALS/POLICES May 11, 1988 Page 2 B. Site Area - Uses with drive-thru facilities shall have a minimum 1 acre net land area. This minimum land area may 6e modified when the drive-th ru facility is within a Master Dian or an integrated shopping center through the Design Review process. C, fie minimum floor area for drive-thru facilities shall be 2,500 square feet. The minimum floor area for a drive-thru facility other than a fast food restaurant may be modified through the Design Review process. D. The maximum site coverage shall be 40 percent of the net lot area. The mi ntmum on-site landscaping, which includes articulated plazas, courtyards, and patios, shall be 15 percent of the net lot area exclusive of public right-of-way. E. Parking and the drive-thru lane shall be setback 45 feet from the ultimate curb face. Greater setbacks may be required as mentioned in the Specific Plan and as deemed necessary during the Design Review process. Section 3: Design Guidelines A. Site Planning/Building Orientation - Future drive-thru facilities in a Master P1 an or shopping center shall be identified early in the review process to avoid retrofitting the uses at a later date. The site design shall minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and avoid locating driveways and service areas which interfere with the flow of the on-site circulation. Building placement shall be done in a manner to create new pedestrian spaces and plaza area. Buildings shall orient the public entrances toward the street. Building layout should be oriented to screen the drive-thru lane. Drive-thru lanes shall be screened through building orientation, the use of a combination of low screen walls, heavy landscaping, and trellis work. Separate pay windows and pick-up windows should be provided. Stacking Distance/Parking - The drive-thru lane shall be a sufficient length to arcommodate the necessary stocking of cars. The stacking distance shall be determined through a parking study as stated in Section 17.12.040C, Special ReQuirements of the Parking Ordinance. Each drive-thru lane shall 6e separate from the circulation route necessary for ingress and egress from the property or access to any parking spaces within the site. PLAN4ING COMMISSION RESC LUTiON !!O. DRIVE-THRU INTERIM 4IGN GOALS/POLICIES May 11, 1968 Page 3 C. Parking - The parking requirements for drive-thru facilities shall he according to Section 17.12 of the Parking Ordinance. The gross floor area for outdoor seating shall be subject to the same parking requirement. D. Pedestrian Orientation - The Site Plan shall create opportunities for courtyards and plazas and other landscape open space to promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous landscape pathway between buildings. The design should discourage a need for pedestrians to have to cross a drive-thru wherever passible. E. Architecture - Standardized "corporate" architectural styles associated wit a chain is prohibited. Drive- thru facilities within an integrated shopping center or Master Plan must have architectural style consistent with the theme established Tn the center. Architecture must provide compatibility to surrounding uses in form, materials, colors, scale, etc. Building planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in Its basic form and silhouette of the 9ui1d1ng. Articulation of building surface shall be encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance through variation of architectural plane, pavement surface, treatment, and landscape plaza. F. Signing - All signs shall conform with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance. Drive-thru facilities within an integrated shopping center or Master Plan must comply with the Uniform Sign Program as established in the center. Section 4: Performance Standards A. Special performance standards for restaurants with drive-thru facilities: The use shall be operated in a manner which does not interfere with the normal use of adjoinfnq properties. If, fn the opinion of the City Planner, the provisions of this paragraph are being violated, the violations shall be grounds for reopening Conditional Use Permit hearings and adding conditions to control the violation. Performance standards include, but are not limited to the following considerations, which, where appropriate, shall 6e incorporated as conditions of approval in all use permits as determined by the Planning Commission or City Council: PL _Oi,un v... DRSVE-THRU INTERIM "-SIGN GOAL Si PGL SC iES May I1, 1988 Page 4 (1) Noise levels measured at the property line shall not exceed the level of background noise normally found in the area. (2) The premises shall be kept clean, and the operator shall make all reasonable efforts to see that no trash or litter originating from the use is deposited on adl scent properties. For drive- thru restaurants or other uses which typically generate trash or litter, adequate trash containers, as determined by the City Planner, shall be required and employees shall be required daily Lo pick up trash or litter originating from the site upon the site and within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property. (31 Ali graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. (4) No undesirable odors shall be generated on the site. (5) The on-site manager of the use shalt take whatever steps are deemed necessary to assure the orderly conduct of employees, patrons, and visa tors on the premises. (6) A copy of these performance standards and all Conditional Use Permit condiLtons of approval shall be posted along side the necessary business licenses and be visible at all times to employees. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ ATTEST: I, Brad ~8uller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resalutton was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERiCK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY PIONE NONE rol ,~XHiBr~~' RESOLUTION NO. 92-106 A AESOLVTZON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-37, A REQVEST TO CONSTRUCT A 3,275 SQVAAE FOOT FAST FOOD l:ESTAURANT (WITH DRIVE-THAN) WITHIN AN E%ISTING SHOPPING CENTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMHERCI AL DESIGNATION OF THE TEAAA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNEA OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLII(EN AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPOAT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-21 A. Recitals. (i) Carl RareRe[ Enterprises, Inc., hoe filed en application for the issuance of Cond itionnl Use Permit No. 91-37 ae described in the title of this Reaolut ion. Hereinafter in thin ReeoLution, Chs subject Conditional Dee Permit request ie referred to ae "the epplicet ion." (ii) On the 22nd day of July 1992, the Plenni ng Comm iselon of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. After receiving all public toot imony, the planning Commission continued the public hearing to August 12, 1992, and directed atatf to prepare a Resolution of Approval. viii) On the 32 tR day of Auqu st 1992, the Planning Comm ieeion o£ the City of Rancho Cucamonga concluded the public hearing. (ivy All legal prerequ ie tree prior to the adoption of Chle Resolution have occurred. e. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it ie hereby found, date rminad, antl resolved by the Planning Commlae ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae fo ilowe: 1. This Commies ion hereby specifically finds tRat all of the facts set torth in the Recite le, Part A, of ehls Resolution are true and correct. 2. Baead upon substantial ev idsnc• prevented to th i• Commission during the above-referaneed public hearings on July 22 and August 12, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, Chia Commies ion hereby epecif trolly finds ae follows: (a) She application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Baee Line Roatl end Milliken Avenue and contains a supermarket antl retail shops; and (b) The properties to the north, south, and east of the subject site ate designated far rssidsntial wee end era vacant and the property to the weer ie designated for eEf ice end ree idential uses and ie vacant and developed with [ownhomee, respectively; end fog ~~/~'j/T ~f PLANNING COlLNISSION ~ OL'JTiON NO. ._-,,, COP 91-37 - CARL KARC....R ENTERRRISES Augua[ 12, 1§92 Page 3 4) Oeliveriee to the site shell be during off-peak hours of the propo bed use and of those Future adjoin irg urea eo as not t0 conflict with the normal operation of the businesses. violation of tRis condition and failure to comply within a reaeonaDle time period may result in revocac ion of the Conditional Uee Perm ii. 5) A designated loatl ing area shall be provided along the nortR Bide of the building. The area shall be striped and posted far loading and unloading only. TRa Final plane shall De reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the ieauan<e of bu Llding permits. 6) No iae levels meaeuretl ai the property line shall not exceed the level of background noise normally Found in the area. "!) The premieea shall be kept clean and the opere<or shall make all reaecnable •ffort• to eea Thai no trash or litter originating from the use is deposited on adjacent properties. Adequate trash contelnere, as determined by eha City Planner, shall be requiretl and smployses shall be requireo daily to pick-up trash or liitar originating from the •ite, upon the Bite, and within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property. 8) All graffiti shall 6e removed within 72 hours. 9) No undesirable odors shell be generated on the site. 10) Tha on-site manager shall take whatever steps neceeeery to assure the orderly conduct of employees, patroner entl via itore on the premieea. 11) A copy cE rheas performance standards and all conditions of approval shall be posted along with the neceeeery business licensee and 6a visible at all times to employees. 12) Trees acceptable to the City Planner shall be provided flanking the drive-thru lane exit. The trees shall be shown on the final lendecapo plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance o[ building permits, 1~3 ,17~ ~} DEPARTMENT OF ~'~}~'~~~ ~>>;~a~~~~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT p; UC.1/Dil/GN•4L t-i,~~7M/l ~ .37 SUBJECT: C~~slI~Pl.S'/!1 /SFSTA,rL-iIZ/LVT APPLICANT: LAllL ~,C-'!N,~ T/Yj~,2F:~/SL~S ~NC• LOCATION: SEC ~E4El~.uE ~ /d~il.L/~N i Those items checked are CordAions of Approval. APPLICANT SMALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION , (!11) 9B1N1B81, FOfl COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDRIONS; A. Time Limbs i V 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, a building pemnits are nolissued orapproved use haz notconmtenced within 24 monthslromthe date of approval. I, 2. DevelopmenuDesign Review snail be appoved prior to r r ~. Approval of Tentative Traq No, Is praMed subject to the approval of 7ne devebper shalicommentce, paAicgate in, andconsummate orcause to be commenced, panicipated in, or consummated, a Melb-Roos Comnunity Fadl%bs Dislrfct (CFD) for the Ranch Cucamonga Fire Prolectbn Distriq to finanrs construabn andror maiManance of a lire stalbn to serve the development. The statbn shall be boated, desgned, and built to all specifications of the Ranch Cucamonga Fire Proteplon DlstAct, and shall become the District's propeAy upon conrpletbn. The equipment shag be sebcted by the District in accordance with As neada. In any building of a stalgn, Itta devebper shall compty with ail applbabb laws and regulatbns. Tne CFD shall be formed by the District and the devebper by the time recordatbn of the final map occurs. S:~clmmPac -J-J_ J~- J-/- ~J_ 5. Prior fo recordatbn of the final map or the issuance of 6tlildirg permits. wh+cnever comes lirsr me applicant snail consent to, or paAbgate in, the estaDlishmeM of a Melb-Roos CommunAy FacAAies District Ion the construction and maintenarlCe of necessary school i IacAAies. However, it any school district has prevbusty established such a Communey FaGlAies Dislrxa, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexatbn of the i projec she into the tertAOry of such existing Distract prior to the recoMatbn of the final map or the issuance of Dwldirg permits, whichever comes first. Further, A the affected school dislncT has rot lonned a Melb-Roos Community FaciMies DistnCt wihin tweWe months from the date of approval of the project and prior lc the recordation of the final map or issuance of bwb~ng permits for said profecL this condAbn snail be deemed null and vod. ~-/~ sr. ziyi , ~~LI ~~~ ' GanMmm'~~¢ This condNion shall be waived N the Cily receives notice that the applicant and all atlected sctaol tlistnds have entered into an agreement to privately accomngdale any arq all school j impacts as a resuN of Ihis projeU. I, 6. Prior to recordation of the linal map or prior to issuance of huildirg pennas when no map is involved, written cenifbation from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water I IacNNies are or will be available to serve the propose0 project shall be submitted to the Depanmem of CommunNy Development. Such leaer must nave been issued by the water tlistnct within 90 days prior to linal map approval in the caseof subdivisbn or prior to issuance of permits in the case et all other residential projects. 8. Site Devebpmem ~_ 1 . The 5Ne shall be devebped and maintained in aaordarice wah the approved plans which include site plans, archaectural elevatbns, eaerbr materials and pbrs, IaMSnaping, sign program, and grading on life in the Planning Division, the pnditbn5 pMained herein, Oevebpmam Code regulations, ant Specific Plan and 1F-,~.iF /2S>A ' Plannetl Community. ~ I, / 2. Prbr to any use of the project sde or Wsiness activity being pmmenced (hereon, all CoMilions of Approval shall be pmpleted a the Satafac8on of the Cify Planner. 3. Occupancy of the faUlNy shah rat pmmence umil suchtime aS all Uniform Buibirg Code and State Fire Marshall's regulatbru have Deen pmplied wNh. Priorto occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Ranch Cucanarga Fire Protectbn Diatrbt and tM BuNding and Salety Divisbn to slaw pmpliance. The building shah De inspected for prrVliance prbr to occupancy. i ~/ _ n. Revised sde plans and lwildirg elevations irgorporetirg all Condttiona of Approval shall be submitted for Ciry Planner review and approval prbr to issuance of DuiWing permits. _ / 5. All site, grading,laMSCape, iniyatbn, arW slreetimprovement plans shallbecpordinatetl for ~^^ckrnrvv p^^r!^ issuance of any perrtwls (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, buibirg ,etc.), or prior to linal map approval in the case of a custom bt subdivisbn, or approved use has pmmenced, whichever pores first. `~ 6. Approval of Ihis request shall not waive pmplianoB wNh all seclbro of the Devebpment Code, all other applicabb CNy Ordinances, art0 appNcable Community Plans or Specific Plans in eheU at the time of Builtlirg PemlN issuance. / 7. A detailed on-site IgMirg pWn shall be reviewed and approved by the CNy Planner and SherM's Depanmenl (989-8811) prbr to the issuance of drildirg permits. Such plan snail indicate style, illuminatbn, bcatbn, height, and matted of shleWirg so as not to adversely affect adjacem progenies. 8. It no centralized trash receptaUes are provided, all trash pido-up shall De for iMividual unas wnh all receptacles shielded Irom public view. !! 9, Trash receptacle(s) are required and snail meet CNy standards. The linal design, bcatbns, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prbr to issuance of WilOirg permis. _~ t 0. All ground-moume0 utilAy appuAenances such as Iranstonnen, AC pndensers, etc., shall be bated out of publk view and adequatery screened Through the use of a pmbination of concrete or masonry wa!IS. berming, and/or landscaping to the satlsfactbn of the Cily Planner. ~~- ~~ JJ- J-J- J~- J-J- J_J_ _J_J- I J~-_ ~_J- u .191 I b5 C noanDut 11. Street names shall be submined for Oily Planner review and approval in aaomance with ~~~ r~_ the adopted Street Naming Policy prbr to approval of the final map. '. / 72, All buiklirg numbers and irWividual unhs shall be benthietl in a clear and concise manner, I ~J- including proper illuminatbn. ~, 13. A detailed plan indbatirg trail widths, maxinum sbpes, physical wndhbns, fenang, and weetl control, in accordance whh City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Chy Planner review and approval priorlo approval arq recomatbnotthe Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvemem and grading plans. Devebper shall upgrade and construct all trails, including lensing ant drainage devices, in conjunction whh street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restndbns (CCBRs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requiremems forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subtlivisbns shall have Iha oplbn of keeping said animals wtthout the necessity of appealing to boams of directors or Homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&RS. 15, The Covenants, Conditions, ant Restnctbns (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Associaton are subject to the approval of the Planning ant Engineering Divisbns and the Chy Aaomey. They snail De recorded concumemly whh the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded a3py shall be provided to the Ciry Engineer. / _16. Aliparkways. open areas, andlandscapirgshall be permanemty maintained bythe propery owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptaDla to the Ciry. Proof of this iantlscape maintenance snail De submitlect for Ciry Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permtts. t 7 Solar access easemems shall be dedicated for the purposB of assuming that each bt or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlgM across adjacem bts or unas br use Of a solar energy system. The easemems maybe comained in a Declaration of Restnd'bns for the subtlivisbn wHbh shall De rewrded corlcunemly wiz ~ °A scordatbn of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easemems shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or arty other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Devebpmem Code Becton t 7.08.060-G-2. t 8. The project wntains a tlesgnated Historical landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic landmark Aheratbn Pennil No. Any further modhx;atbns to the sde inducting, but not limited lo, exterior aheratbns andror imerror atteralionswhbh aHedthe exteriorof the buildings or structures, rsmoval of landmark trees, dertgMbn, rebcatbn, reconstruction of W iWir1¢S or structures, ercharges to the stle, shall require a motlilbatbn to the Historic landmark AReratbn Perrtkt subject to Historic Pfeservalion Cpnxniaabn fBVI@W end approval. C. Building Design 1 An ahernative energy system is required to provWe domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for Heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other ahernative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalem capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the hme of initial devebpmem shall be supplemented whh molar heating. Details shall be Included in the buiblrg plans arq shall bB submmetl for Chy Planner review and approval prar to the Issuance of building pertnrts. ~~- ~_J- ~rJ- J_/_ ~~- J_,~_ J_J_ 2 All dwelkrgs shall nave the Iront, side and rear elevatbns upgraded with architectural ~~~, .J-J_ treatment, detailing and increased delineatan of sudace treatmem subject to Ciry Planner li review antl approval poor to i55uanoe of building perms Sf. ~ 3/91 ~ I r c,,:w~oon o,m 3. Standard patio covet plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submdted for j Cily Planner and Building Official review ant approval prior to issuance of buikfing pennns. j J~_ 4. All rool appurtenances, including aircondilbners ant other root mounted equipment and/or J~- proledans,shall be shiebedfromviewandthe sound buNered lrom adjacentpropenies and ~ streets as required 6y the Planning Divisbn. Such screening snail De archiledurally integrated wtth the huibifg desig7l and constructed to the satislad'an of the Csy Planner. ~ Details shall be includetl in twibirg plans. D. Parking and VehbuWf ACCAaa (Indlcale detalb on building plans) / 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall haveaminimumoutsidedimensionof6feetandshall J~- contain a 12-inch waec adjacent to the parking stag (including curb). _~! 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and texturetl pavement across cirwlatbn aisles Shall be J~- provitledthroughout the tlevekKxrient to Conrxsct dwe Ilirgs/unhmbuibirga with open spaces/ plazayrecreatbnal uses. / 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, J_J- emrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. d. All ungs shall Ce provided wiin garage door openers N driveways are less than 1B feet in JJ- depth from Bade of sidewalk. _. .__-, 5. 1TeCovenams,COndabnsandRestrfctbnashahrestddMasloragedrecreatbnalvehicl~s J_J_ on this site unless they are the princpal source of transponatbn for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in Oeaignated visaor parkkg areas. 6. Plans for any securMy gates shaft be submdtetl for the City PWnner, Ciry Engineer, and J_J_ Rarx;rb Cucamonga Fire Protedbn DiSYnd review and approval prbrto issuance of building permks. ~ E. Landscaping (for puDlley malMalnxM IerMxape areas, reNr to Soctlon N.) / 1 AdetailedlandscapearMingatanplan,irlckrdirpabpeplantingandmodelhomeWndscap- J_J- ing in the case of residential devebpnfent, snail be prepared b1' a licensed landscape architect and subnlihad for City Planner review and approval prbrto the iseuarlCBOI huiWlrg permits or prar linal map approval in the case d a custom bt subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place snap be protrkded wdhacorlatructbn barrier ~ J,_/_ in aaoroance wdh the Municipal Code Sedbr.l9.OB.110,and so notedon Ihegradirgplans. The bcatbn of tMse trees to be preserved in place arM new bcatbns fortransplanted Trees shall be shownontha detailed latMSCalM plans. The applbam shak lolbw all of the arborist's recommendations repenting preservation, transpWntirg and Mmmirg methods. __3. Aminimumof_treespefgros5 xre,mmpdsed of the tolbwing saes, shall Deprovided J_1- wAhinthe proled: % - 48-inch box or larger, °~ - 3& inch box or larger, - 24-inch box or larger, _ % • 15yalbn, ant _ %- 5 galbn. __ a. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project snail be specimen sae trees - J~- 2a-incn boz or larger. / _ 5, Wilnin parking bts, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-galbn VBe for every three J_J_. parking stalls, suNicient to shade 50°/ of the yanking area at solar rbon on August 21. i sc ~ xr9i a ! p7 ±-,~: ~,. !~/v 4/31 ~ T, ~ M ~,~ _6. Trees shall be plamed in areas of public view adjacent to and abng structwes atarate of one . tree per 301inear feet of buikfilg. ~~ -~'-i- All private sbpe banks S lest or less in vertical heghl and o15;1 orgreatersbpe, but less than 2:1 sbpe. shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropdale ground cover for erosbn control. Sbpe planting required by this sedbn shall include a permanent ingatbn system to be installed by the devebper prbr to occupanq. Allpmate sbpes inaxcess of5fcet. but lessthana teal in venical hegM antl of 2:l orgreater sbpe shall be !andscaped and ink]ated for erosion comrol and to soften their appearance as folbws. one 15-galbn or largersize tree per each 150 sq. tt. of sbpe area, t-galbn or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. tt. of sbpe area, and appropriate ground cover. In add'Aion, sbpe Hanks in excess or 8 feet in venbal height and of 2^ or greazer sbpe shall also include one 5-galbn or larger size Iree per each 2S0 sq. h. of sbpe area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered cbsters to soften and vary sbpe plane. Sbpe planting required by this section shall include a permanBM irrigatbn system to be installeA by the devebper prior to occupancy. 9. for single fatuity residential tlevebpmant, all sbpB planting and iMgatbn snap be coMinu- oustymaintained in a healthy arW thriving condnbn by the devebperuMn each indivi~ral unit is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Priorto releasing oocupancyforttbseunas, an inspectbn shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that Ihey are in satisfactory condAbn. 10. For muAi-lamity residential and ron•resideMial devebpmeM, property owners aze respon- sible for the continual maintenarlCe of all landscaped areas on-she, as weN as oorniguous planted areas wdnin the pudic rigMOl•way. Ap IarMSCapeO azeas shah be kaq free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and ttlrNirg conditbn, and shall receive regular pruning, feniliaing, mowing, and trimming, Any damaged, dead, Olseased, or decaying plats material shall be replaced wshin 30 Jaya Irom the date of damage. 71 Front yard IarWscaping shall De required per the DevebpnlBM Code and /or . This requirement shah be in atltlitbn to the required street trees ant sbpe plamirq, ~ 12. The linal desgn of the perimeter parkways, walls, IarWSCaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shah be subject to City PWnner review and approval and coordinated for consistency wsh arty parkway Wrltlscaping plan which maybe required by the Engineering Divison. ~ _ t 3. Special landscape lectures such as nbunding, alluvial rode, specimen Size trees, meaMer- ing sdewalks (weh horizontal charge), antl intenssied IandsCapng, re required abng / ta. Landscaping and irrigatbn systerra required to be instalbdwilhlnthe public ngMOl-way on the perimeter of this project area Shan ba coMiratousty maintained by the Oevebper. _.1r=t5 An walls shall beprovided wAh decorative treatmaM.lf boated in public maintenance areas, the desgn shall be coordinated with the Engineering Divison. _ t6. Tree maimenance crtteria shall be devebped and suWndled far Csy Planner review anc approval prbr to issuance of building permds. These craena shall encourage the nature growth characteristics of the selectetl tree species. _,! t 7. Landscaping and imgatbn shall be tlesgrred to Conserve water through the principles 0 Xenscape as delined in Chapter t 9.16 of the Ranctro Cucamonga Munblpal Cade. ~'_/- _/_/__ J _/. J~ J_/- ~~I- ~~- J~- -'~- i ~~- SC.2/91 5 'DQ F. Signs ,c,,.~. m o.,~ / 1. mesignsindicated onthe submitted plans arecoweptualonly and wtapan of this approval. -/-/.- Any sgns proposed for this devebpment shall comply with the Sgn Ordinance ant shall 'i require separate application and approval by the Planning Drvisbn prbrto installation of any ii signs. 2 AUniform Sgn Program rorthls devebpmeM Shall be submMed for Ciry Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permAS. 3. Directory monumem sgn(s) shall be provided for apartmem, condominium, or Iowntwmes prior to occupancy and shall require separate applicaton and approval by the Planning Divisbn prior to issuance of buibirg permits. G. Environmental 1, The devebper mall provide each praspecfivelwyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as detertrined by the CAy Planner, priorto acceptirg a cash deposit on any property. 2. The Developer shall provide each prospective buyer wrttten ratite of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a starx7ard lortnat as determimed by the CRy Planner, pbr to accepting a wsh deposit on any property. 3. The devebper shall provide each prospeddive buyer written rotice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard lortnat as determined by iM City Planner, prior to axeptirq a case deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall De submMed for City Planner review ant approval prior to the issuance of huiging permits. The final report shad discuss the level of imerior noise amenuatbnto bebw 45 CNEL. the WiWirg materials and construdionlechniquesprovbed. and it appropriate, verRy the adequacy of the mitgation measures. The buiWirg plans will be Checked for conlortnance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. M. Other Agencies J~- J~- J-1- JJ- J-/- ~'J- / t. Emergency secondary acnessshall be providedinaocordarrce with Rancho Cucamonga Fire I Protedgn District Standards. I / 2. Emergency accessshall be provided, maimenance tree and clear.a minirtumof 251eetwide at all limes during construdgn in aocordartce wAh Rancho Cucamonga fire Pmtedbn Disirgt reouiremenis. ,~_ 3, Prior to issuance of building pemts for combustible conslructbn, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for lire protedan is available, pending completbn of required lire prolodbn sys+em. _. / a The applicam shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and bcatan of mail boxes. Muiti-family residemial devebpmems shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes wdh adequate IgMing. Tne rival locatbn of the mail boxes and the desgn of the ovemead structure shall be subject to CAy PWnner review and approval prbr to the issuance of buibing permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written cerlMicatbn of acceptability, including all supportive iMOrtnatan, shall be obtained Irom the San Bemardinc County DepanmeM of Envnonmemal Heaith arx7 suDmlDed to the Building Official poor to the issuance of Septic sank Permits, and prgr to issuance of bwlding permits. J~- JJ- J~_ -/-/__ J._J.-. SC 2/31 8 f ~~ .~, .; ,ivy 37 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714} 989.1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITK)NS: I. She Devebpment i 1, The applicant Shallmrply wsh the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani~ ' J~- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Cade, Nalbnal Elegnic Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in eReq at the time of Issuance of relative partnss. Please contact the Building and Safety Divisbn for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prbr to issuance of Wilding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mapr addsbn I J_J- toexistirguns(s),the applicant snail pay developmentlaes at the established rate. Such lees may include. but are rot limited lo: City Beautsicatbn Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Deveopment Fee, Perms and Plan Checking Fees, ant School Fees. / 3. Prior to issuance of Wilding perms for a new commeroial or iMustdal development or ~ J-J_ addition to an azisting devebpmeM, the applicant shall pay devebpmeM lees at the established rate. Such lees may include, but are not limited to: Systertu Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Perms and PWn Chegorg Fees. / 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the BuildingOllicial,aftertracuparcelmaprecordation _/_J- aM Drior to issuance at Wilding perms. J. Edrlsting Struulur~e 1. Provide cortpliance wsh the Unsorm Building Coda for the property line clearances J-J- considenng use, area, ant tire-resistiveness of azislirg Wiidlgs. 2. Existing Wildings shall W made to comply wsh mrteq Wilding and zoning regulatons for i J-J- the intended use or the Wilding shall ba demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal laglsies shall be rertgvrW,IilledaM/orCapped to wrtyly with the J___/_ Unsorm PbmDing Code and Unsorm Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilsies are to be bC2ted and shown on Wlltling plans submsted for i J~- W iWing perms applicatbn. K. Grading ~ 1. Grading of the subjeq property shall ba in acwrdance wsh the Unsorm &ri4dirg Code, City J-~- Gradirg Standards, and accepted grading practices. Tna final grading plan snail be in substantial coMOrmar>ce wsh the approved grading plan. ~! 2 A sods repod shall W prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calsomia to --~-~- pedortn Such work. 3 The deveblxnent is boated wsnin the soil erosgn control Ooundaries: a Soil Disturbance ~ J-,'- Pertnsisrequired. Please contaq San Bemardla COUrey DeparlmeM Ol Agnicusure at(714) 3872111 forperrM application, DacuriteMation of such permit sha8 be submsled tothe CSy poor to the issuance of rough grading perms. __ 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualsied engineer or geobgist and 5ubms101 at I -~--'- - Ihetime of applicatgn for grading plan cftedr. 'I _ / _5 Thelinalgradirg plansshall be completedand approved priortoissuanceof Willing permss.l'-~-_i .. SC ~ x/91 ~' I I I'~ y s, ~D[yve,-fIOB, Rancho Cu camonga, et at ea ne w speaking on behalf of the Etiwantla Hiet oricaL Soc _ety ae Jim Clark could t be at the meeting. Hr. Banks said she Nister ical Society agreed wi Che ~oort and conditions. ccmmiasioner Tolstcy asked who would build the barn. Mr. flanks stated the job would have to go out to bid becau ae is considered a publyc works project. He said that although the Society embers do small lobe all the ume, she barn will be Duilt by a contractor. Comm ysaionar Melcher asked when the parking lot will be ilt. Hr. Dnnke et sled they hnve wanted to build the pa[ki lot for a long time and it weultl be a logical flow for it to be construct right after the barn. He said the reconstruction of the inside of the h0 a ie on track and shay are about to publish a notice to invite reconstruct' n. Xe said they have planeed some of the trees but heltl otf on the shrubs d lawn until after Bonet rut Dion is finished. Comm iaeioner Melcher hoped adequate rkinq fat it it iee will be available before any eignif icant opening of the ildinge co the public. Mr. Ban ke agt wd Chat would be b , but he noted that much of their uc rk L done by volunteers. Carvnysa inner Melcher comnen that the house looks better now than it did before it was moved. commtseyoner Chit iee c rked that ens had been on the Design Review Committee when the project waa eviewed and ehs was amazed a[ the planny ng ynvolved in terms of historic aepec[a and the carefully tnought out plane for the future. Sne felt t will be a wonderful add it yon to the comma mty that may be ut::yzed by a 1 of people in the future. Mot :on: ed by Toletoy, seconded by Chit iee co adopt Che reeolut ion recommend' g approval of Modification to Conditional Use Permit 85-04. Motyon carried the following vats: CONMI5520N£RS: COMMISSION £RS: COMMISSIONEPS: CNIT IEA, NCNIEL, ME LCN£R, TOLSTOY, VALLETT£ NONE NONE -carried E. 'NV•RONME N'AL ASSESSMENT ANO CONDITIONA USE PE R. IT 91-]7 - CARL KAPCNER ENTERPRISES, iNC. - A fequest to construct a 3,]95 square Coot feet food res[av rant ~w yth love-thru~ with yn an exyst ing ehoppynq center yn the Neyghbo rhood Cammernal desigmtyon of the Terra Viete Planned Community, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-:51-21 Staff cecomme nde ieeu ante of a Negat yve Declaration. P:ann :nq Comm tee:on Mtnucee ^6- July 22, 1992 Scott Hurphy, Associate Plan re r, presented [he at off report Commies io ner Valletta asked if the matter would be retucnetl to the Deeign P.eview Committee if the conceptual site plan were approved. Hr. Hurphy felt that iE the Commise ion supported the use, et: off could prepare a resolution addreeaing the coneerne that hoe been rarsed at previous meeange cn ether dr:ve-ihrua. He ea:d rf the Comm isaion desired, the project could be returned to Design Review. Ct.a:rman McNiel opened the public hearing. Tom 01ey, Carl %arcF.er Enterprreen, 1200 North Narbor Boulevard, gnaheim, stated a master plan hod been approved in i99D with a fast food restaurant on the pad in question. He enid the building orientation shown on the master plan was the same a• what they were proposing. He noted CAat the shore aide at the drive-t hru lane is along Milliken and said he felt the proposed lattice w:11 provide atlequ ate screening. He remarked that the drive-thru lane would probably only be full during about L-1/2 hours per day. He E¢lt [here had teen definite Lmplied approval when the master plan wa• approved. He •aid when they submitted a second set of tlrawinga tr the Deeign Review Comm arse, they were told the uae may not be appropriate. Hs felt shay had acted in goad faith [o addreae all the ieauee which had been raised. Ha requested the Planning Commission approve she concept wi[R any addii Tonal changes to be made at an administrative level. Comm a99ione[ Ctfitiea noted Chat the Deeign Aeview Committee had requested a rev:setl color palette. She as ked if one had been eubmieted. Mr. Murphy responded [hat the revised cnlo[ Doard was hanging on the wall. Comm:es:oner cha :ea did not feel the awning colors were appropriate. Cc r..m as:Doer He lcher noted the screen wall on the Bite plan eztentletl almost to the end cE she bu :Iding whereas on the elevation it d:d not extend that far. Hr. oley responded that the intent wee for the wall to ext entl to almost the end of the bu ii d:nq, ae depicted on the site plan. Comm iea:aner Va llatu asked tha location of the desagnated loading aria. Mr. Murphy replied them is none and the applicant had indicated they can spec :,fy smaller erueke for de i:veriea. Cc:rn ae:oner Valletta asked through which entry the Bootle would be delivered. ..r. O:ey replied de ::ver:ee wcu ld be made at the H:ll:ken entry. Ne noted t^.at smai:er cru aka could easxiy make the turn and they would typo ally have de::vereea only durrrg of[ hours. CoRm iseicner Toletoy observed there are several of their reataurante in the C ay. He Ee It they would be more apt m uae larger trucks Co serv:c• all of ..._ .'aril a:e9. P:ann ing Co mm:ea :an M:nutea cT July 22, 199: II Z Mr. Oley said the service facility a iocated in Anaheim and it would nor be a problem to utilize smaller trucks with more frequent deliveries. Commissioner Toletoy queetionetl if the delivery trot ka would not be taking up parking spaces. Hr. oley replied they could hatchmark the area ae no parking. Corumiesnoner ': olstoy asked if they had core itlered the wands coming f[cm the ncrch when pl ann:r.g the outside eating area. Nr. Oley ea id [hey feel the outdoor eating area will primarily be used only in scmmer and fall, eo they were not Coo concerned about the winds. Commissioner Toletoy questioned if they had thought about providing shade Eoz the outdoor seating. N.t. 01ey replied they had consideretl providing shade but felt thet most pecple whc eat outside want sun. Commissioner T. olstoy stated that he personally tree to sic outside, buG he does not wish to sit in full sun. He aoked if the applicant would be willing to provide some type of a shade etruceute. Nr. Oley red pontletl [hey would prefer oat to, but would be willing to research the mac ter. Ha noted that the building had boon •ignif is ently enhanced since it was first eubm itcetl. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McN iel closed the public hearing. Comm iae:o nor Melchor tole roar recent Commies ion action with regard co the fast food restaurant to be iocated near Milliken antl Highlantl woultl negate the Comm,iseion'e ob;ectione with regard to the drive-thru eo long ae [he ac teen wail is extended. Ne waa concerned about deliveries antl noted that the applicants off-hour deliveries would have to coincide with otf-hours for the other busineseea in the area. He fe Lt the conditions should include a provision that if any of the main drive aisles or parking areas used by other sensors are obet to cted, that would toner itutetl grounds for revocation of the permit. He felt the site plan ie workahle. Comm lesions[ Ch it lea agreed with Commis io nor Melchsr's comments regarding del iveziee. She was concernetl about she choice of colors shown an the revised color palette. She objected to the ehada of rod in the awnings and the trim antl felt the colors need to be more coneietent with the balance eE the cer.te r. She agreed with Commissioner Toletoy'e commence regarding shade. She felt shade should 6e provided Eor a portion of [he area with perhaps a .cmbination oC !ard scaping antl/or trellis. Commissioner Va llette felt the Comm isa ion wee acting coo quickly on the pro7ec[. She though[ Bite plan issues other than the tlr ive aisle should be add reseed. She was concerned with the prox :m ity of the play area to the main drive a ale (5 feer.~. Sne though[ the plane ahoultl return to the Des iqn Planning Commission Minutes 1]10' .%uly 22, 133' 113 Review Committee for more detail on the landscaping and outdoor play/eating area. She also asked Row sign if icant the landscaping would be on the east srde cf the building, ae the commented that woultl ba one of the main views ae the center is exited. Hr. H::zphy noted that there is a 5-foot sidewalk with 5 feet of lantlecaping between the curb and the bu iltlinq. Cormieeioner Valiette said the drive-thru and the mitigation measures regarding visibility from Milliken are fine, but she felt tRS •ite i• too email and the building ie put had too close to the main drive aisle. commissioner Tolatoy •nid he had already voiced hie comments regarding shatle. He felt the Cammids icn should ru-evaluate the drive-<hrv triter •a. He said he was willing to accept the applicant's plans regarding tleliveries for this Bite, but he felt the Commies ion needs to further study Row deliver iea can be made and how drive-thin lance can be better integrated into each projects. He thought the Commission should pechape consider larger lore for future projects to allow more landscaping between Lhe Ruildinqs and parking lots. He ~fe It that pads tlasignatetl for a tlriw-ihru should ba more <atafully sevdietl with regard to configuration when new vita plena for any shopping center are reviewed. He said the Commission had slready approved the concept of a Eaet food restaurant in this location. Ha supported tRS project ea long as shade ie coneitleretl and a bettor color paletN ie pressnesd. commissioner Vallatte noted the[ tRs policy requ free a minimum 2,500 square feat facility and the proposed facility i• 3,275 square Eau[. She at ated her c oncerne with the Bite plan have to do with Row Ear it impacts the drive die le and how close the restaurant and ploy area come to the main tlrive die le. She did not auppo rt the ptoje<t unlos• it returned to the Dee aqn Review Committee to address those issues. Chairman McNie1 felt Commissioner Tolatoy had made some excellent comments with respect to the Commies ion's approach to dt iva-three. Xs agreed the restaurant was being built on a minimum lot eixe, but he felt it met the cr iter is and would be an ascot to the community. Hu supported the project. He reopened the public hearing. Hot ion: Moved by Mulcher, ^scondsd by CRit iea, [o continua Environmental A99e96ment and Conditional Uu Putm it 91-37 to Augu tt 12, 3992, to allow ataEE to prepare a rsao Lution of approval with appropriate conditions, Motion carried by the following voce: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL~ MELCHE R, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VALLETTE A.95EN:: COMMISSIONERS: NON£ -carried :Ce Plan nt r,g Commies ion recessed from 8:40 p.m. to 8:50 p.m. Pla nn Ong Commission M~.nutes ~Vlr July 22, :992 try Chair cNiel opened the public hearing. Clarence Henn 892i Reeves Court, Rnncho Cucamonga, stated h pted all recommended rood: s. Heari rg ne further <es<im Chairman McNrel cloy a publu hearing. Commies Toner N.e lcher noted that th r cation was at and erd of a cul- de-sac streets so there was no visna t of jutting into a front ye rtl ae one drives down the street. Motion: Moved by Va seconded by Me lc her, to t the resolution approving Var Lanc Motion carried by the following vo AYES: OMMI95IONEAS: MCNIEL, MELCNER, 20LETOY, VALLETTE :10 COtiN ISSiONEAS: NONE F. Et'V IAONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITION U PERMIT 91 3] CAA N ENTERPRISES. INC. - A request to Construct a 3,275 square foot fast foctl restaurant (with drive-thru) within an ex Tat inq shopping center in the Neighbeehood Commercial designation of the Terra Vista Planned Community, lccated at the southeast corner of Baee Line Aoad and Ni,lliken Avenue - APN: 227-151-21 St nEf recommends is euance of a Negative Declaration. (Cant inued from July 22, 3992.) Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McN if: opened the public heating. Frank Oley, Carl Karcher Enterprises, 222 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, objected .o Condition 2. Ne felt the awning colors and configuration had been addressed earlier in the proceaa. He eaitl they understood the concerns regarding the roof iqurat ion and they were proposing an awning that ie tlifferen[ from their standard awning. He noted they were proposing a red awning with goltl stripes, while the it standard awning is gold with red stripe e. He indicated the change waa mad• to be more compatible with the remainder of the center. He remarked that the retl selected i• a eeatlemark color for Ca rl'e Jr. He said they had made architectural changes and would lake Co retain the color. Ne requested that Cona it ion 3 be changed co reflect that the City Planner coultl approve the shade structure plane. He noted they had recently worketl with staff regarding a shade structure for their location at Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Sou levard. He requested that Condition 6 he cha ngetl to reflect [hat deliveries would be made during oEE-peak haute and chat additional wording be added to permit a reasonable time period for correcting problems in connection with tleliveriea prior to action on revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Oley asked that they be Plano nq Commission Hinutee vY` August 12, 1992 its L' X//~a~T' '~'" permitted to work with staff regarding the trees flanking the drive-thru lane exit. Ho was concerned with the requirement for specimen-size trees and felt they may create a driving hazard. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Me lc her supported the appl icant'a request to have staff approve the shade et ructure. He agreed with the suggested revised wording regarding Condition d. He noted Ghat the City hoe generally been moving away from requiring specimen-size trees because of potential rooting problems and he suggested that Condition 12 be rewritten to provide that trees acceptable to the city planner be provided flanking the drive-thru lane snit. He felt condition 2, requiring the awning design and colors be approved by Daeign Review, shoo ld remain ae wrlt ten. Commissioner Valletta noted that the was concerned about loading and unloading. She asked if the Design Review Committee members Ee It the matter had been adequately addressed. 5ha felt the lack of a loading area would set a precedent for future drive-thru facil it tee. Chairman McN ie1 remarked that Commieeioner Meleher had been uncomfortable with the concept from the beginning. However, he noted the Commiae ion ha• leverage, in that the Cond i[ional Uee Permit can be revoked if problems arise. He observed Chat Che condition required that deliveries be made during off-hours and the applicant had indicated they would specify that smaller trucks be used for deliveries. Commies inner Melcher remarked Chat one of the reasons he supported the project waa that the originally approved alts plan far the shopping canter depicted a East Eood restaurant with a drive-thru in the location of Lhe current application. Ne noted that the currant plane closely follow the approved master plan. kr. Murphy remarked that Condition 5 requires that a loading area be striped and chat the area would accommodate the smaller trucks the applican< had indicated they would use. Commissiener Valletta agreed that the awning design and colors should ba approvetl by the Design Aevisw Committee. she was •cill concerned about the loatling area and felt the •ite we• overcrowded. Sha felt Chere thou ld be a minimum eE 5-7 feet of landscaping between drive-thru arses and building pads on future sites. Commissioner Toletcy felt staff and the applicant could find an acceptable solut io r. to the trees flanking the drive-r.h ru exit and he was agreeable to the suggested revisions to Condition 4. He felt Condition S regarding the loading area waa acceptable but he Eelt there should be fort her consideration regarding loading areas in regards to future drive -t hru re9taurante. Hs Ee It staff could handle [he shade structure but he supported the condition requiring that the awning design and colors be approved by the Daeign Review Committee. Planning Coimniesicn Minutes b6r August 12, 1992 chairman McN ie1 agreed to the additional au gges red language fot Contlit ion 4 and felt staff could work with the applicant regarding the trees flanking the drive-[hru exit. He concurred that the awning approval should return to the Design Aeview Committee and questioned if the shade structure should not return to the Design Review Committee at the same time. Comm Sasioner Tol stoy as ketl if Chairman McNiel Ee1t tha< it was truly neceaearv co recu rn the shade structure to the Design Review Committee. Chairman McNiel felt staff could handle both the shade at rvcture end the awning quo et ion e. Commissioner Toletoy felt the awning shoo ltl return to Design Review but though[ staff could handle the shade et ructure. Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Toletoy, to ie eue a Negative Declaration and adapt the resolution approving Contlit Tonal Uee Permit 91-37 with modifications to require that the shade structure and trees flanking the drive-thru lane be approved by [he City Planner, Chat deliveries be made during off-peak hours, and that failure to correct delivery vie lot io ne within a reasonable time periotl may result in revocation of the Contl it ion al Ueo Permit. notion carried by the following vote: AYES: CDMMI55IONE RS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY HOES: COMMISSIONERS: VALLETTE ABSENT: COHMISSIONERS: CHITIEA -carried A subdivision of 3.45 acres of land into three parcels in borhootl Comme[O ial Development ^ietrict locatetl at the ao eat coin f Base Lrne Road and Hellman Avenue - APN: 208-202-1 nd 14. Staff re nds issuance of a Negative Ceclarat ion. Dan Jamee, Senior Civ ng inter, presented the staff repot commissioner Helmer quest d how to ensure the site would be maintained at cne level o[ sorv with three ee is ownerships. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, note are CC6Ra Eor the property. Brad Buller, City Planner, nctetl t the m r Cond it ionai Uee Permit for the shopping center i9 contl' nod to provide oper maintenance and the division of the property w not voitl Uat contl iii Commissioner Melch waa concerned there may be three rate levels of maintenance wit a common area maintenance agreement. Ralph H n, Deputy City Attorney, euggeototl that Standard Cond It ion 7 be mo d to include maintenance agreements for landscaping along with Planning Comm iss: on Minutes bY- Auqu et 12, 1992 RESOLUTION NO. ~a - ~ ~ ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCSL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA, CALIFORN iA, APPROVING CONOITI OVAL USE PERMIT 91-37, AND DENYING AN APPEAL OF CONDITIONS CF APPROVAL PERTAINING TO THE AWNING COLOR ANO DESIGN AND THE LANDSCAPING, A REQUEST TO CONSTPllCT A 3,275 EQVARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT (WITH DRIVE-THRU) WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER IN THE NEIGNSORHOOD COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF TH£ TE RAA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, hOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MI LLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 151-21. A. Recitals. (i) Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. hae filed an application for the approval of Conditional Vse Permit No. 91-37 as described in the title of thin Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Uae Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) on the 22nd day of July, 1992, the Planning Conmdssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the hearing to August 12, 1992. (iii) on August 12, 1992, the Planning Commission concluded the public hearing and adopted its P.eaolution No. 92-106 thereby approving, subject to certain conditions, the application. fiv) On August 17, 1992, the applicant filed an appeal with the City Clerk within the time 1lmi is prescribed by law. !v) On September 16, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded Said hearing on that date. (vi) A11 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have xcurred. D. Reso lotion. NOW, THEREFORE, it i.s hereby found, determined, and reso lve3 by the Ci t; Council of the City of Pan cho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of fire facto set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Aeso lut.ion are true and correct. CITY COUNCIL REEOLUTION NC. APPEAL CUP 91-37-ICARCREA Eeptember 16, 1992 Page 2 2. cased open substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 16, 7992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby speci `. ically .`rods as follows: (a) The appli ration applies to property located at the Southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and ease Line Road end contains a supermarket and retail shops, and (b) The properties to the north, south, and east of the subject site are designated for residential uses and are vacant. The property to the west is designated for office and residential uses and is vacant and develoaed with townhomes, respectively, and (c) The development of a 3,275 square foot fast food restaurant is consistent with the Neighborhood Commercial designation of the Terra Vista planned Community and the Conm;ercial designation of the General Plan, and (d) The application, With the conditions of approval contained within Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-106, will comply with all applicable standards of the Development Code. (e) The application proposes an architectural design that is consistent with the theme established within the shopping Center, including form, materials, and colors, except for the awning design and colors as appealed. The proposed use of corporate colors (i. e., red and yellow) For the awnings is inconsistent with the conditions of approval for this integrated shopping center, as set forth i.n Planning Commission Reso lutien No. 90-83, which requires that all buildings within the center be designed consistent with the architectural program established, Inc ludl nq "architectural elevations, exterior colors and materials..," (f) The Planning Commission required additional trees flanking the drive-th ru lane exiC to address the lack of trees along the east building elevation. The trees would be located in two landscape planters which are of sufficient size to accommodate Queen palms consistent with the established landscape theme of the center. 3. Eased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findi nqa of facts sr_f forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as fellows: (al That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code, and specific plane; and (h) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable Chereto, will not be detrimental to the public hee lth, safety nr welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 11 I r CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. APPEAL CUP 97-37-RAACHER September 16, 1992 Page 3 (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions o£ the Terra Vista Planned Community and the Development Code. 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 and, further, the Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration on August 12, 1992. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusicna see forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal and approves Conditional Use Pezmit 91-37 subject to all conditions of approval contained within Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-106. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc., that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified nail, return-receipt requested, to Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inr,., ai the address identified in City records. 120 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbfO~GA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 '~~: :dayor and M_mb_rs of the City Cauncii Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager :ROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 9 k': Steve Hayes, Ass o~.:r ate Planner 3UBJEC T: APPEAL OF SIGN PEAM :T 32-hN - TEXACO - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decrsion denying the installation of a ra nopy sign at an existing service station within the Special ^_ommercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 4166 cc^oothi 11 Boulevard - APN: 207-112-20 RECOMIHNOATION: Staff recommends that the Crty Council deny the appeal aM uphold the Planning Commission's decision by adopting the attached Resolution of Denial. ABSTRACT: The pv roose of this public hearing is to consider the specific r=quest of the appellant, which is to install a sign on the eonih pump is to nd canopy fns cia (see Exhibit "B"). The proposed 9entif ica *,ior, si gna ge is consistent with Te taco's corporate sign program hning instituted across eh_ count: y. HAC1fGRDUND: on August 12, 1992, the Planning Commission ro nside red thh is app lira r.i on and upheld staff's decision foc denial. Gene ra ily, the Corm fission denied the Sign Permit request on the basis that the size. of <he sign •n the freestanding canopy should be limited to 10 percent coverage :: a si gr, canopy face, as required far all wa 11 signs per the sign Ordinance. Secondly, the sign, in their opinion, would not be i stn ilr_h i.n a location that offers the desired visibility £or west 'o~und traffic along Foofhiil Boulevard. The Convnission asked that the appellant work with staff on ot'ner sign alternatives, such as an aid ra: coal monument sign on the east side of the property along the F on th[ll Boulevard Eron to qe. 2n. ~i Brnt*.<rsr the sign company for the station's operators Mr. b Mrs. G nnza le s, appealed the Planning Co nenission's de cisicn. in response to C~mniss eon's conrarns with the size of the si qn, the appellant has su bm:*_ird a re wised design flee Exhibit "B"~. The sign is preposed to he redo c?d „~ area Erom 44 syuace feat to 7.5 square feet consistent w it4 the 10 peroent Limitation. CITY COUNC?L ETHFF REPORT SIGN FERM IT 92-141 - TEXACO September 16,1992 Page 2 For your convenience, staff has attached the staff report and minutes from the August 12, 1992 Planning Commission meetiny. Respect ly su6mitte/d, // Brad Bu er City P abler BB:SH: mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - wetter from Appellant Exhibit "B" - Revised Sign Ezhi.bit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated Auquet 12, 1992 Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Minutes dated August 12, 1992 Resolution of Denial X22 SIGNS 6Y Q~fi Mayor and Common Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10600 Civk Canter Drive Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 Deer Mayor and Common Council: 212 SOUTH I STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF 924'IJ PH. 714-BB5.dy7B FAX 774-Ba&2239 August 21, 1992 ..ITY pp gq,NECHO COCA CITY pIERK MONGA AUG 24 1992 We hereby egged to you the decision of dmid made by the Planning Commission at hs meeting on August 12, 1992 for sign permit # 92-141 on bMdt of our Giant ~izebsth Gdves dba "Texxo". Our original proposd was to instaN on the canoDY. one 111 set of intemdly AluminMed 30" letters to read "Texaco" and one (1133" logo to ktcorponte the stations sppeeranu with the corporate image of "Texaco". However we found during the pvmk process h h a City polky net to Blow aignage an ststion canopies: then are two 121 sntions (Union 76 6 Chewonl whkh currently have existing canopy signage. It is Texxo's trademark and identity to have signaga on 1M unopies o1Mr than the building. We would Iiks to have the soma consistency in eppeuenp a other Texaco atatbns. During the meeting Me Plannng Commission was wigirtg to compensate our rsywst whh a monument sign for addhiond identity; howwar dw to the con difMrenw and tlts othv repuinmenta such as a 5' setback end clear site view, we found thn the monument sign would not bs of any bensfir et tltis location. We era willing to work with the sia of the canopy signage. Texaco has retail facility standards which stations an to follow for consistency for corporate image. Attached, plnse find two 121 elevations whh the proposed signage sloe end en dnmttive poaaibiliry, It would bs greatly apprecimd for the conaiderstkn of the canopy signaga. Poease schedule this matter to be heard as soon as poaaible. Thank you. SincudY Youn, Enc.: 2 prints NK/ar OUIEL BROS. ELECTRIC SIGN CO., INC., Nancy Knhey Psrmh Coordinstor SALES • SERVICE • (EASING • MAINTENANCE • CRANE SERVICE • NEON (ilil Cornrrtm Lcmw No 1i TJra ~ ~' ~ , /; i .` ICJ 123 r; -~- ~: j I `~ r E! f ~~~ ~ J "~ ? . , , ~~TJ 1// . ? t ; ~/ J d O ~ J [~ J x 3 = ; ~~r ~~br~ z; / N 0 Ni ~ ^n£~ ~ ~ w ,: ~~r~ 9 a. t JI3 m ~~ 0 S J ~~~ I e I Y Q, I i' ~ d; ~ .a I I :, ~,' j r ii, rv S I! +~ ~~ i ~ ~ - } ~ _~, a ''I , i', -. •i ~i~; =~ ~; ,, ' d i i! Y~- d ii ~ s' tt ~ ~--T- v 9 ~ x ~I *°~ ~ V ~ i S: I I ~ ~~i C ~(~ ~ sill ~ ~ I ~ I l i ip • ~I O Yi ~ e;i III I o a i l o ~ m~~~~~ y i i II jli i t I //_~y'W PL ~./~_ / ~1 ~ i Ii J i i i.l .~:. i' Fri ~: .~ ~!1 ~ ~N'i~ II g I li € I i , '~• ~,~~ i ~ ' ~;: ' n i , ~+I ~~ ~. \ 5 ~~I~ ~~ ~~ I~: 'i j ~! I i~ ~~ ~: :~ it i~~ii li ~"I1~ I• .l.~r ~ 2~~ - CITY OF RAtiCHO CL'CAD40tiGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 12, 1992 T0: Chairnar. and Members of the Planning Commission F RGM: Brad Ruller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner ~;~cA.ygy , `Z'~t~C9 ~; ,. ai r~ > .. ~ > 19"" SUBJECT: APPEAL OF SIGN PERMIT 92-141 - TEXACO - M appeal of the City Planner's decision denying the installation of a canopy si qn at an existing service station within the Special Co®ercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 0165 Foothill Hou lecard - APN: 207-112 -20. ABSTRACT: The appellant is seeking approval to install a sign and logo on the south side of the newly constructed canopy fascia at the above referenced automotive service station. The request stems Erom the new corporate image Texaco is creating across the eountry. Stations are being refurbished through the use of an enlarged canopy and building fascia and a corrugated metal building siding (see Exhibit "D"). As pact of this image, identification si gna ge is proposed on pump island canopies (see Exhibit "C"). BACKGROUND: On June 17, 1992, the appellant (puiel Brothers Sign Company) contacted City staff regarding the above request. At that time, staff informed the app Brant that a canopy sign with 30 inch letters would be denied, based on its inconsistency with the Sign Ordinance and City desi gr. policies (which will be discussed in further detail in the Analysis Section). 5^_aff recommended that the sign be placed on the south building fascia with smaller (24 inch high maximum) letters. In staff's opinion, a wall sign on the building, in combination with the existing Foothill. Boulevard monument sign (which is proposed to remain in place) would give the station svff orient visibility from Foothill Hou levard. The applicant, well aware that the City would recommend denial, immediately filed their appeal, which was received by the City nn June 29, 1992 (see Exhibit "A"). However, staff did not begin process±ng the appeal until Sign Permit 92-141 was officially received and denied by staff on July 9, 1992 (see Exhibit "B"). ANALYSIS: In reviewing the proposed Sign permit App lrcat ion, the fcl Lowing items serve to support staff's recommendation Eor denial: A• Cario py Sign policy: In the early 1980'x, the Planning Commission established a policy prohibiting the installation of signage nn service station pump island canopies. This policy stems from this City's broader pe rsoective rn the planning of new service stations. Typically, newer stations at street intersections have been designed with "reverse bay" site planning, whereby the pump is Lands and canopy are hidden from streets by the building. Hy doing this, there is no need for ra nopy si gna ge; signs are placed on the buildings or monument signs ::onatrvcted which are closer to the at re et. Furthermore, the canopy can be in to grated with the ae rvice station building through the 'tee of identical canopy roof treatments, Easci.as, and column supports. 125` ~H~~ "G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REFGRT APPEAL OF SIG:! PERMIT 92-141-TEXACO August tt, 1992 Page 2 Ezamp les where these Fo lic ies have been implemented include the Mobil service stations at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue ("reverse bay" pla nr. i.ng) and Milliken asd Hi 3h land Avenues (pump is lard canopy arch itectural compatibility). In s*_aff's opinion, the policy prohibiting canopy signs should apply consis Gently to existing service stations as weli as future service stations to avoid setting a City wide precedent allowing canopy signs. These Po lici.es for service station planning have been imp cemented successfully and the above referenced examples are the model by which other stations (existing and future) should be judged. H. Location of Si qn: The proposed sign is located on the south face of the pump island canopy (see Exhibit "C-1"1. A wall sign placed on the south elevation of the store building would have the same exposure to Foothill Boulevard; ache it somewhat lower. There is no significant difference in setback be tween these two sign locations. Square Footage of Sign: In reviewing the types of signs allowed by Ghe City's Sign Ordinance, staff considers the proposed sign to be a wall sign, which is limited to a maximum size not to exceed 10 percent of a building face or 150 square Eeet, whichever is less (see Exhibit "E). GL Ven the proposed sign area is approximately 44 square feet and the sou t*. building canopy face is approximately 79 square feet, this yields a wati ,`.ace coverage of approximately 55 percent. The letter size would have to be reduced to approximately B or 10 inches to comply with the maximum square footage requirement nn the canopy. This Ordinance vie la ti on further supports staff's recommendation for placing the si 9n on the building; a larger sign closer to the requested size could be installed on the south building face sinre it has a much greater area. Fcr they, the Sign ordinance reference to "build±ng face" implies that wall signs are intended tc be located on buiLdi ng wal, is and not on a roof canopy. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Pianniny Commission receive any addi tinnal testimony from the appellant relative to this request. If after receiving any additional testimonyr the Commission concurs with the findings made by staff, then adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial for Sign Permit 92-141 would be appropriate. Respe lly sub ed, Brad er ~'lity anner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Le t7er from Appellant Exh ibi,t "B" - Sign Permit Application F, xh chit "C" - Si qn Permit Plans Exhibit "D" - Typical Du ildi.nq Elevations for Texaco Exh lbit "E" - Sign Ordi nonce Section 14.20.100 Resolution of Denial ~ 2-~0 SIGNS BY ~~ 272 SOUTH I STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALF. 92410 PH. 71a885O476 FAX 714Ea&2239 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planner Steve Hayes P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Hayes: June 24, 1992 RE: Texaco 8166 Foothill 81vd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA We are appealing the Planning Departments decision on location of identification signage for Texaco. Presently there is one (i) freestanding sign with the Texaco logo and pricing requirements. All wall signage has been removed with the remodeling of the station. our request is to install one (1) sat of channel letters with logo on the south island canopy. This location is typical with Texaco's standards. No other signage is proposed at this time. Please review the enclosed plans and if there are any further questions, please call me. Sincerely, NK/jf CITY 01 enc.: 3 prints QUIEL BROS. ELECTRIC SIGN SERVICE CO., INC. Nancy Kashe Permit Coor inato 1 color r,VN Zy~ check $62.00 n-y~,'',p, , 'Y)SI~MwM~~Is.A,r (^ 4" .r - , SALES • SERVICE • LEASING • MAINTENANCE • CRANE SERVICE • NEON Gilt Gnlruton Lc•nw No ttT,11y 'Z~ i City of Rancho Sign Permit Cucamonga Application Z 7 Z_ Z Z Q J 0_ Z W o_ O J W W } H Z 0 U O •- Z W Q Z W GENERAL INFORMATION Name of establishment 1 EXAC' d Date ~n-29-9? Address 81(s ~o ~~oT N'r t ~~--U'i7 Applicant's Name GZL~,C~~+~~-~ Crc,,.lS Address 7'77 ~.n.T" ;-[' ~><T Phpne~~S-4Ll'7~ c n ~ Q¢ o , ~... o r..-~ n r- ,a OWNEA'S CERTIFICATION, OR RECOGNIZED AGENT I Owner's Name ~i7~INi 1']A/A~ Signature I Adtlress LIZ G , -r' ~~P ff ITT _ PnoneB SIGN DESCRIPTION N um Der and type or sign(s): _Temporary Wall_MOnument Canopy __ Subtlrvislon _ Window ~ Uniform Sign Program ~ Directional _Pedestnan Other Slze: Length W~id-t~h Depth Overall Height ,Sg1,~Ft. Bldg. Face Sq. Ft. Slgn 1. ~ R _-.11- ~~ ~a1¢ ~-I ~-I ~r sign z .- Sign 3. _ Slgr, d _ ,_, Sign 5. __ Slgn 6. _ If temporary or subdivision. date of installation If temporary or suDdivl s;on. date of expiration Cash deposit amount Indicate sign copy. size, cola end mele[lale on plane deecrlbed on IM eflecMd eMete, acT1DN Approved ~Denled I i gy. I Date: ~ Comments: ~ 7W'-~a/nr MlSfldn ,O~rC~ i iiEE NO_ Uc'E aEr,E•'.]9r I c~ `R[CI I PHOTO ~Za .~ ~. v d ~J 1 ~. _~ J . l - .~ +'- " ~ x -~ d r ' ' r 1 Y I Y Y J - _ AN}y) ~ 1Ay1 ,, c ~ ~~ ,\ GC 1 I tii i- ~~, V ~, ~C^' it _~. ~ x /,, ~~; "a 0 ~` D ' £ ~ y ~! /~/~ N, ~ 11~i/IINF~ ~ - i - /i G L. ~. .: d u kI i ~ 3 u~. ~ ~:v9 r i yi is ~, ; i /// II a f 9_ ~~~~ ai~ll i~ ~ ~~ u ~ N(/ d 0 / y I _ L..,._z_ :an Tn ~~,.~ ~~ . "lf~t iii ~ t}i~i~ l S 4 !il j ;ili (iii} • i ~ ,~^' . ( sI,U ~ 5 ~I i;~ili 1 ' ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~iij {h~l i i J n ~Ii I l~ ! ' ~i i ' :~ ~'I11i II !~ i~iii ~ H ~ i; ii~i~ / ~ 1 a / ~ j ~i ! ii~p ~~ ;1 ~! ~' If F ~~~: ~ L 1 I 1 ~i ~ f- I I __ Z aA -. ~ , i~ 4i: 13~ _~ ~e -,.z. _.._. e ~ ~, ~~'' -~- ~:f }.;~ ,r L y ~~ L J~ :: ~.~ I. I ~ ~' ~, 'h\ a i \ ~~ d ~' I ;i la.za.loo ~I :i~il 2~_ N :I u id J ~~s.= u GO n yY JG N = G C v O V ~~ env N ~ O GG _ CYJ~O ~ OyCO.^i p L7 . •• •9 r' Q O G) 'u ~~ )V V 0` G °-g,! tea',. YG C~ppC y~yY ~(yy^~~~y~)-OOgJ O T~+000V~~N VQ09UGV mum..-.may.. CCCCG e c d o r L m 3 ~J C J a ~: {{a~ y `~C gN9.~ (eancho Cucamonga 12/88) P° c~ i xg ~g'E~~od ~G yy~:i^ e$ en ~.°. y^~ ~' i - ` O 993 $ ~ ~''JQFpF O g fyys O•C~rVOV <i?~~~uo i a .. i 8S •n ~ o ~~ O Y -~a ~y-~ ag'g8L aaz;a ^GrYyl ~~ 7 "a~^ ~~! Y m .y _"z T ~fr • , Y J ~ ^ VCY^ ~g°a as~~ ... d~sa g~~ aBsS= »a:° w i 18~-4 ~~ ,~l ~ 3.3 E _Ya Y = °S~ c~y$ ^; .2 P^~~ )^ ue.Q FLU Y11 A^)- a~YYip ~i~~ rR'~.). y- c y.. m c' S.' E ~gBE~u~r, n ` ~ y , y ~.. i~'1~i~ti'`~ in ) J 11 L v y Y 6 a .J 3Q~ 00~~ L ue Yyy Y6J0 s`~~= ~~ ~::oJ ~~ 3a :S y>y P ~yy u RESOL'JTiON NO. ~~-: L' A RESOLOTION OF THB PLANNING COMMISSION OF ?HE GTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING SIGN PERMIT 92-ial REQUESTING 2HE INSTALLATION OF A CANOPY SIGN AT AN 'c XISTSNG SERVICE STATION WITHIN THE SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLANT LOCATED AT 8166 FOOTHILL 000LEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-1i2-20. A. Reci`ale. (i) Quie1 Brothers Sign Company Ra• filed an application for the Approval of Sign Permit 92-161 a• de ocribod in the tit le of this Reaolut ion. Hereinafter in th ie Resolution, the subject Sign Permit is referred to ae "the aFPl is at zo n." (ii) Or. June 1], 1992, City vtaff informed the applicant Coat the application would be denied, based on ita inconsistency with the Sign Ordinance and City Design Po liciee. Tho application wa• officially denied by staff on July 9, 1992. ~iti) The decision reprosantod an said Sign Permit App L Cation was timely appealed to this Commission, (ivy On Augu vt 12, 199], thv Planning Commies ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meet inq on the application and concluded sazd meetrng on cha[ date. (v) All legal prerequ ieites prior to the adoption of shit Rego lut ion have occurzvd. R, Ree o'utiOn. NOW, THEREFORE, it i• hereby found, dotezm inod, and reaolvod by the Plannzng Commission of the City o£ Rentho Cucamonga ae follows: 1. This Commi uion hereby spec zfiq lly finds [hat all of the fa<te set forth zn the RYC h ale, Part A, of ihie Resolution are Crue and co [rect. 2. Bated upon aubecart ial evidence presented co th i• Commies zoo du ang the above-referenced public mooting on August 14, 1991, znclud in9 wrztten aeaff reports, this Commuazo~ hereby •paciEical ly finds se followo: (a~ TTe applzcat ion applies to property located at 8166 Foothlli Boulevard on property zoned Special Commerczal, and is currently developed wzth an existing automotive service station; fib) She property to the north of the subject errs ie vacant and zoned of (zce; the property to the south of that uu coneteu of Cho Maq u Lamp Reetau ran: and Is zoned Spec zal Commorctal; the property to tRe east ie an ex ietzng mmme rc .al but rotes and zoned Spec zal Commoruel; and the props rt7 Co the west zv vacant and zoned O[[ue; )3y PLANNING COMMISSION P--O L'J T: ^v:r :w. APPEAL OF SIGN PERHIi 2-ial-T EfACO Au goat 12, 1992 Page 2 (e) Tha appiicat ron contemplates the instal Lauon of a 0a aqu are foot wall sign c~ c..^.e south aide of the neviy roar aLl ed pump reland canopy facing Foothill 6nvlevard; !dl The Sign ordinance rests cta wall sagre to a ergo area based upon the by rldinq face wh uh is rote rtled m lim rx o+aLi sign pl ac ems rt to walla, rather than a roof canopy, as propo aed; (e) The application ae propo vea sign it icantly exceeds <he ma%imum allowable sign area of 30 percent of a building face, as per Rancho Cucamonga Hunicapal Code Section 16.20.100. The application propoeea a sago area of approximately 55 percent. (f; The propoaetl sign could ba alternatively locaced on the score bu iLtling which ie apptoximateLy the same d:etance from Foothrll Boulevard ae the pump island canopy. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to chit Commiae ion during <he above-referenced hearing and upon the spec if le tindinge of facto oat forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 abcve, thin Commission hereby Ei ode and concludes as follows: (a) Tha design of the •ign i• not coneieCent with the intent and purpo ee of the Sign Ordinance; !b( Tne pr opoeed application is nct in ccmpliancs wrth each of the applrcabie provisions of the Sign ordinance; 4. The Planning Commission hereby of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denrea the application. 5. The Secretary Co tors Commreeion shall certify to the ado pt ron of Ch ie Reao lutacn. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS i2TH DAY OF Au goat 1992. PLANNING C~4l1ISS ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA BT 1, Cha arman ATTEST: .~"~ B d Bu erg Becr :ry I, Brad Buller, Secretary .f the Plano rng Commie uon of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ceru fy Chat [hs foregoing Reeolu[eon vas duly and regularly rntroducsd, paeaed, and adopted by Che Plannrng Commre•wn of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meet rng of Che Plannrng Cemmrae eon he id on the 12th day of Au gu ec 1992, by the follow rng vote-to-vat: 13S PIAN4:NG CO`L4:55 CON r -OL~iCON NO, .-... APPEAL OF SIGN PERNZ_ ,2-:4:-i`_XACO August 12, 1993 Paga 3 AYES; COMMISSIONERS: :~iCNiE L, ME L~"r'E R, TGLSTOY, VALL_TTE NOES: COMMISSZONERS: 3GNE RESENT: COMMISSIONERS: C'iLTIEA 1 J~O at state this think fast because of the ai pion. Commissioner Melche concerns. He felt in planning of centers. Commies inner Valletta Fe 1t e plan. She noted she was still way traffic would mitigate some Chairman McNiel felt the Comm iasion' pad to the eas< of the plaza. He Commission may be pleasantly eurpr ra it is connected by the extendetl p~ Motion: Moved by Vallett Declaration and adopt the of Motion carried by the fo wing AYES: COMMISS/ 5: MCNIEL, NOES: COMMIS NERS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: CO IONERS: CHITIEA Chairman iel requested that eta recently eon approved and then pr policy DIPECTOP'S REPORTS plaza will be happy with th nor conce He He ant on id not that a roject lie sinner Toietoy•a mO rB CdrefUl in th8 ed with the proposed Bite oatling area but Ee1t the one- . She supported the project. not hove approved the bank on the the project will De nice and Che ie of the corner plaza arse because seconded by fl ut ion approving vote: [o aeue a Negative ianal se Permit 91-40. MELCHER, VALLETTE \ -car ff study she new dr. opose changes to the which had hive-th ru M. APPEAL OF SIGN PERMIT 92-141 - TEXACO - An appeal of the City Planne r'e decieicn denying the inat allot ion of a canopy sign at an existing service station within the Special Conine trial Diet rict of the Foothill Eoulevard Specific Plan, located ac B16fi Foothill eouleverd - APN: 207-112-20. Steve Ha}•e s, Associate Planner, presented the staff report Chairman NcNiel inviced public comment. Planning Commission Minutes ~IA• and tzatf is f!.ow since it was first presented. He fe le that w i eion fire4 approved the center layout it was anticipated that the corner of Hilliken Avenue and Kenyon Way would be utilized ve hat the plaza Ls not used by the bank to the west of <he pl d th riginally approved master plan called for a sit-down rea r pad a he felt that would make better use of the plaza. e d the p1a will be used with the proposed site plan. He reed food recta ant ie needed in the area, but he did not euv t the p stated he sympaehizetl with future the Commission ehou Augue[ 12, 1932 I37 Elizaheth Galvie, Texaco station owner, 8156 Foothill Boulevard, stated that Texaco ie helping her remodel her st et io n. She felt that drive is traveling vest on Foothill Baulev and cannot sea the co rrer monument sign until they have passed the tlriveway. She thought a sign on the canopy could be clearly aeon antl wou itl help enhance her bueineae. She acknowledges that newer at at ions are not alLOUed to have canopy eigna but noted the newer stations aze built with s<za<eq ically plann¢d walla on which eignage ie visible <o the community. She requested that a canopy sign be permittetl and indicated a willingness to reduce the proposed size. Nancy Kaehey, Signs by Quiel, 272 South I street, son Bernardino, stated they had been told by staff that aig nags would be via ib le if placed on the building. She acid there is only one drive entrance from Faot hill 0eu Levartl and she felt the house locatetl to the es at would block the view from weatbou ntl travelers. She showed pictures of typical Texaco eignage and a copy of the Texaco placement et andarde. She stated thnt Texaco no longer places signs on buildings becau ae they feel that canopy eigna are more visible. She agreed that eignage on the building would work if the et at ion had bean built under the newer st andartla but she felt aigne shoo ld be permitted on the snoopy because it is an existing station built under the oltl atantlartle. Chairman McN iel asked if the letter would be illuminated. Ms. Kashey sa itl they would be illuminated channel letters. Comm iseioner Valletta asked how many aigne are currently on site. Ma, Kaahey et aced there ie only the monument sign at the co[ner of Red Hill Country club Orive and Foothill Boulevard. There were no addit i.onal public comment e. Comm ieaioner Melcher asked if a variance would be needed iE the Commission were <o permit a canopy sign. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated it would be a matter of iniacpreta[ion. He said staff 'n ad always interpreted canopies ae being roofs and roof eigna are no[ perm ittetl. He noted that the Sign Ordinance also reetricta Coverage to 30~ percent of building fora and the propoeetl sign is approximately 55 percent of the canopy face. He thought that if the Conunise ion were to permit the canopy sign, it would generate requests from other service station owners [o add cancpy aigne because she eigna would be higher and more vieib la. Comm rasioner Melcher noted that he generally does not favor overriding staff, but he observed the property is awkwardly configured and there ie little chance it will be redeveloped with d new Baru ic0 station. He felt actions should be taken which would allow the bueineae to be viabl¢ and presentable. commissroner Toistoy did not Eeel a sign nn the canopy would 6e any more visrble to travelers going westbound on Foothill 8oulevartl. planning Comm rssicn Mrnutes a3O- August 12, 1992 13'3 Chairman McN ie1 noted there are two eery ice st atione in the community with canopy eigne; the Chevron et at icn at Vineyard Village and the Union 76 et at ion on Foothill Boulevard. He noted the Chevron station hoe a sign under the eaves. He said both signs are tastefully tlone. He felt the picture shown 6y Ms. Rashey depictetl the type cE aign the City is trying co restrict, in that :t is too large. He felt it would be ire ppropr tote to permit the size requested by the applicant. He thought perhaps a ama11 logo on both aides of the canopy may be small enough and would easily identify the site for !revelers. Commissioner Valletta asked at aff'e opinion. Mr. Buller believed eu ch an action would ¢et a precedent which would make it difficult to restrict canopy eigne in she future. He notetl that the Commission hoe not permitted canopy eigne on the newer stations. He euggeat¢d the applicant could submit request for an under-canopy logo. Commissioner Valletta noted the applicant currently hoe only one aign and would be permitted up to three. Chairman McNiel Ee 1t a monument aign placed near the Foothill Boulevard driveway wou i.: ce vieibie to traffic going Doth east and ueet along Foothill Sou levartl. cortmiae ionera Valletta and Toletoy agreed. Comm iseioner Melchor agreed that additional aignage ie needed. chairman McNiel asked if the applicant would be amenable to submitting such a request. Ma. Galvis liked the idea and ae ketl if it would be possible to hnve the logo on the canopy as well. Chairma r, McNiel felt the logo would not be necessary. Mr. Buller said ins Commission should deny the appeal and scoff would work with the applicant on placement of en additional monument aign. He noted chat the code permits one monument aign per street front and the et at ion fronts on both Red Hill Country CLuD Drive and Poot hill Boulevard. Motion: Moved by Valletta, seconded by Melchor, to adopt the resolution deny :ng Sign Permit 92-141. Motion carried by the following vole: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, ME LCHEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA -cased Comm isa inner Tolstoy requested that et aEf be directed to work with the app! :ca nt on placement of an additional monument •ign. Planning Ccmm asion Minutes nkSf August 12r 1957 ~~ RESOLUTION N0. / 1_ a 5y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING SIGN PERMIT 92-141 REQUESPING THE INSTALLATION OF A CANOPY SIGN AT AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION WITHIN THE SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARG SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8166 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-112-20. A. Aecita Ls. (i) Qui el Brothers Sign Company has filed an application Eor the Approval of Sign Permit 92-141 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Aeaolution, the subject Sign Permit is referred to as "the apo ii ca lion." (ii) On June 17, 1992, city staff informed the applicant that the application would be denied by staff, based on its inconsistency wl th the Sign ordinance and City Design Policies. The application was officially denied by staff on July 9, 1992. (iii) The dec.i.s ion represented on said Sign Permit Application was timely appealed to the Planning Commission. fiv) On August 12, 1992, the Planning Commt asion of the City of Ran chc Cu ce moo ga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. At that meeting, the Commission adopted its Reao lotion No. 92-111 denying the application. (v) This decision represented by said Planni n9 Commission Resolution was tr,re ly appealed to the City Council. (vi) Or. rye 16th day of September 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a non-advertised public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. (vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have oc_urred. B. AesoLution. NOW, •CHEREFORE, it is hereby found, determi ned, and resolved by the City Council of tfle City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Aec it,a ls, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon cubs tantial eei dente presented tc this Council during the above-referenced public meeting on September 16, 1992, including written staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: 140 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. APPEAL OF SIGN PEFM IT 92-141-TE%ACO SeptemSer 10, 1992 gage 2 (a) The application applies to property located at etoo Foothill 6ou]evard on property zoned Special Conine rcia 1, and is currently developed with an existing automotive service station; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and zoned office; t!:e property to the south of that site consists of the Magic Lamp Restaurant, and is zoned Special Cortvnercial; the property to the east is ar. existing commercial business and zoned Special Commercial; and the property to the west is vacant and zoned office; (c) The application contemplates the installation of a 44 squat^_ foot wa 11 sign on the south side of the newly installed pump island car.npy Eacing roothill eoulevar d; (d) The Sign Ordinance restricts wall signs to a sign area based upon the building face, which is intended to limit wall sign placement to walls, rather than a roof canopy, as proposed; (e) The app Li ca tion as proposed si gniEicant ly exceeds the maximum allowable sign area of 10 percent of a building face, as per Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 14.20.100. The application proposes a sign area of approximately 55 percent. (fl The proposed sign could be alternatively located on the store building, which is approximately the same distance from Foothill Boulevard as the pump island canopy or an additional monument sign could be constructed along the Foot_hi 11 Boulevard frontage to provide additional v tsibtlity for the station. 3. cased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing and upon the speci:ic findirgs of facts set for Lh in paragraphs 1 and 7. above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The design of the sign is not cansiste nt with the intent eni purpose of the Si qn Ordinance; (b! The proposed app llcation is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Sign Ordinance; A. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the appli rstion. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Quiel Brothers Sign Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution imtst be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of. civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 5. 'Lhe City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby diemted to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) fnrthw ah transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, retn rn-zecei pt requested, to Quiel Bmth ers Sign Company at the address u3enttfied to Ctty records. 7. The Ci[y Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolut loo. I) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council ll~J~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer eY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR RELOCATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT (APN 208-331-01) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution d eclaring the public need and necessity and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said resolution. BACKBROUND/ANALYSIS The City has recently approved a contract to widen Haven Avenue to three lanes both north and southbound from 4th Street to Civic Center Drive through a combination of resurfacing and street widening where necessary. The construction should 6e underway soon. Staff has completed the design for Lhe next section of construction between Civic Center Drive and the north side of foothill Boulevard. The only remaining roadblock is the need for obtaining additional right- of-way at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the relcaation of the Crafflc signal and street widening. The fity Attorney has been 1n contact with the attorney for the property owner, Mary Margaret De Ambroglo, since February 5, 1992, regarding purchase of the needed right-of-way. The City had an appraisal conducted through an independent contract appra lser. In June 1942, an offer was presented to her attorney based on the appraised value and conversations between the two attorneys. To date, the offer has not been accepted, nor have the street dedications been received by the City. The City has been notlfi ed that funds for this phase of construction are available and need to be appropriated this calendar year 1992. The Environmental Initial Review was approved by the City Council on June 20, 1992, as categorically exempt. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR RELOCATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANO CONST. OF ST. IMPROV. AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL d HAVEN SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE 2 A Notice of Intent to Condemn a portion of said property was matted on August 13, 1992. Respectfully submitted, ' /~.~' Nilliam J. O'Neil - City Engineer WJO:MO:sd Attachment '143 RESOLUTIOx No. 9a ~ a ~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SWTHNEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL 80U LEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINOI NGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the alignment, construction and improvements to the Traffic Signal and Roadway at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "pro)ect"). Based upon such analysis, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for alignment, construction and improvements to the Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue Traffic Signal will require the acquisition of a portion of that certain real property commonly known by the street address of 10385 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Assessors Parcel No. 208-331-01, and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A". (ti) Pursuant to the California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for right-of-way far establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of Californta Government Cade Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by an independent appraisal valuation; (iv) On September 16, 1992, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the terms of Californta Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 14~{ 8. Resolution. NON THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, part A, of this Resolution. SECTION 2: That the real property which is required for the street improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonya, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evfden~e presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, includf ng written and oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTIgI 4: The Cfty Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in eminent domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street and traffic signal improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount ~~S of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession within 3 days and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resoiuti on. PASSED and ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1992 Dennis L. Stout, Mayor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of September, 1992, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of September, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: CDUNC IL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: ra ams, y er City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~D RfGHT OF WAY EXHIBIT "A" APN 208-371-01 N.E. GOR. SEG. I I, 715 RTW S.B.M. C O 89.19~C5°E _ _ `C FOOTHILL BLVD. 2~ o ~ I T.P.O.B -l 1 JIYI 3 1 5 R9•19_OS~~E RW~ N 89.19'03"'N NLY LINE OF SEG.11 ~1 ~i) PROJECTION UNE~ LOT I CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS BEARINGS: lO N89°1905~~W ~2 S CO° 40~ 55"W G S 89° 19~05~~ E . ~4 SCO°1024°E J S B9° 49~ 36~~ W ~~ N44°4444"W ~7J NCC'40~55 ~~E DISTANCES: 60.26 70.00' 28.27' 48.57' 7.00. 30 88 ~. 27 00~ 1 , 1 RW~ E~~7 LINE CF SEC II z ,o 0 0 _ z 0 I °- f L ,m z m 1~~- 30~ LEGAL DESCR IPTIGN -HAT PORTION OF LOT 1 OF CUCAFIONGA FP.UIT LAUDS Ili GECTIO!'+. i! • T CWidSHIP I SOUTH, RANGE 7 lJEST, SAN BERhLiRDIPiD BASE A4iD 41ER[i)ii:'I ACCDiiDitJG TO OFFICIAL GOVERIJPIE!JT TOWNSHIP PLni THE RE DP A?17 AS FE i PLAT RECORDED [N BOOK 4, PP.GE 9 DF PIAPS, RECURDS CF S:dr cEFNAFUliJU COUtJTV, CESCRi DED AS FOLLOWS: B`eGiNNi NG AT THE NORTHEAST CURtJER OF SAID SEC1'IUN !1 AS S!ICbPI fal A PARCEL MAP RECORDED iN POOK 95. PAGES 76 THROUGbI 79 IiVCLL'S'1bE OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID SRN BERNARUifJO CUUNTV; Thic~+~E NGR7(I 09°19.05" WEST, 60.26~FEET ALONG THE IJOP,7HERLV LINE DF SaIC SECTION, SAID LINE DEING PARALLEL TO ANU 20. G0 FEE'( ~IUR (HERI_i FRGM THAT PDRT ION OF THE CENTERL [NE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SHD41fJ AS HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH B9°i9'GS" WEST ON SAID PAP.CEL PiAF; THEtJCE SOUTH 00°40'55" WEST, 70.00 FEET TO A POIIJT CIJ THE Sr UTHERL'i L[NE OF FOOTHILL BUULE YARD. SAID PDIN( BE IIJG 1HE (RUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (HENCE SOUTH 89°I9'OS" EAS7, 28.27 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 33.00 FEET WESTERLY FFOI~I ThiE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION ll, SAID PARALLEL LIME DE[WG TFiE wESTERLV LINE OF HAVEN AVENUE: THENCE SUU'TII 00°In'04" EfdS(, 4G.57 FEET ALOIJG SAID WES TERLV LItJE; THEIJCE dOU'(H d9°49'36" lJEST. 7.OG FEET: THENCE NORTH 44°44'44" WEST, 30.88 FEET; T4iEIJCE !JOR T(I 00°40'55" EAST, 27.00 FEET T^ THE TRUE PO RJT OF dEG1PIN IM1IG. ~\ .~ ~ 1\I,FGS is CCC~..-~--~;, ' ;„ ',~ i "",GCi ~~ .~ fal%`.'LL3 /~ nrn Zo9•e7r-nl ,.. aE57 CCRNER CF F:GfHiLL A!.0 HAiEN flfcaflmr,a ntounrzo er City of Rancho Curamonge W XEM PfCOROFO Y111 TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P. D. Bpx BO] Rancho Numonda, CA 91]30 fP1CE aEpYE THIS PNE fpP PECOVpETa VIF _ AP': 208-331-C1 EASEMENT FOA .\ VALi:AOLE CON$IDEAAiION. receipt Of which is hereb.~ acknowledged, ycq. vnopagr- 7E A°~9ROG IO AS TRUSTEE CF TPE 7E A,YBROG;O FANILY TRUST GRANT(S) tp the City of Rancho Cvcamonga, • Atunicipel Corporation, an EASEMENT for RGA'vVAY LMPROYEMENTS, SIGNAL MOD IF IC0.TION5, INGRESS ANO EGRESS ir., ever and upon that certain rvy property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of $an Bernardino, Stale of Cabforma. Descnbcd as Follows: 7NAi PCkT TON OF LOi OF CUCAMONGA fRWT LANDS IN SECTION 11, TONN$HIP 1 SOUTH, AAIiGE 7 VEST, SAN BERN0.AOIN0 BASE AND MERIDL4N ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL GG'7E0.NME NY TC9NSH [D PLAT THEREOF AND AS PER PLAT RECOPOEO IN BOON 4, PAGE 9 OF YVPS, RECCAGS Of SAN BERNA901N0 COONTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOVS: 9E$i NNING A7 THE NORTHEAS7 CORNER Of SAID $FCi ION ll AS SHONN ON A PARCEL M4P RECORDED IN DOOK 9E, PAGES 76 THROUGH 79 (N&LUS IYE OF PARCEL MAPS, AEC00.D5 OF SAID SAN gERNARD(HO COON 7Y; THEKLE N00.TH 89 19'05" NEST, 60.26 FEET ALOtIG THE !l70. TNEAlY LIRE OF SAID SECTION, SAiO LINE BEING PARAIIEI TO ANO 20.60 FEET bOAi NERLY F40M THAT PORLION OF THE CENTERLINE OF FOOTHILL DOUIEVARO SIIONN AS HA~rING A 6EA0.ING OF NCR iN B9o19'OS" HEST ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE SOUTH 0010'55" BEST, 70.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINf OF fpOTHILL OOId'LEYARO, SAID POINT DE ING THE TRUE PCINT OF OEGINN ING; THENCE $OUTN 89 19'O8" EAST, 28.27 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PA0.ALLEL NiTH A.ND 17.00 FEET 'n ESTERLY FROM THE EA67EALY LINE OF SA 10 SEC7I GN ll, SAID PARALLEL LINE BE RIG 'HE 6ES'EALY LI!!E OF MAVEN AYENVE; iHEll&E SOUTH 00030'21" EAST, 4A.5] FEET aI,~NG SA I7 '.ESTERLY LINE; inENCE SOUTH 8a 49'6" VEST, 7.00 FEET; TIIENLE NORTH 44 1A'44" wE$i. 30.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 40'55" EAST, 27. DD FEET TO TIIE -n„E POi'li OF 2EGI NN iNG. Dated . 2NERAl. ACKNOWLEDGMENT llalaal ___-l DntRUln._1aYpt _~ _In_.palprt n,a. S4. .a.~lY ar Tt vndpalpnell NplafY Pvellc, PartpnElY apotUt'J G PmsonaPY mewnlo me G prmal to ma on ma wtleahappamorr tYl4mu m pe lne penpnUl Wnost namePl IvDfcnpeO to Ina ellAln m11Nm101, In01Nn4RI1U91D Ihll 0AI4UI1011, YilinFOC my nw0 eng pn,clel ueL Nsl,r,: e~Y~~.lcl. - `--.- TIIIa fa A aaxlnAL AEM N1NECpGfN1xT, PI.RAnR IIIR Pnnnta xr`. Nnw\tnn['u1u* • • n,n.., .... CITY OF RANCHO CLCAIvIONGA STAFF REPORT v DA^E: September 16, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Mara ger E ROM: Sphere-of -Influence/EN5P City Council Sub-cortenit~ee Denois L. Stout, Mayor y Chuck Euquet, City Council Memb_r l._~ BY: Miki Eratt, AICP, Associate 2lanner SUBJECT: CONS IDEPATION TO WITHDRAW THE EXISTING ANNEXATION APPLICATIONS FILED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ETI WANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - The City Council sub-corvni ttae recommends that the City Council accept their re conmien dation to withdraw LAFCO Annexations No. 2624 and No. 2625 in that there is no County support or other property owner support for the annexation requests at this time. HECOMNffi7DATION: The sub-committee re ro mmends that the pending applications be withdrawn because of the lack of property owner support. BACI(GROII®: On May 16, 1997, at the request of property owners, the C ay Council passed Resolutions of Intent to expand the Sphere-oE- :nEl.uence and annex the Etiwanda North aces. Accordingly, three separate app l: ations were filled with LAFCO. (See attached Vicinity Map. Duriny preparation of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Repor!, property owner support for annexation was withdrawn. With completion of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and Certification of the Environmental impact Report or. April 1, 1992, the annexation actions beta m? eliyib le for hAFCO consideration. T'ne status of the applications is as Eollows: i.AFCO Nn. 2624 - This is a request to expand the Sphere-oE- Icfb;ero;e by aporoxi marely 1, tsc ___.... of lac" . s:d in pri vatc nwners:::p, located ahnve the National Yorest boundary line beyond our. current ri ty's Sphere-of-Influence boundary. The Etiwanda North Sne r.:fic Plan did oce ->.ona this additional area even though a is outside n£ our existing adopted Sphere-o£-Inf Laence. Property owner support is not required for this action. The a pp l:cation is pond in y. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SPHERE-OF-INFLUENCE ANNE%AT ION APPLICATIONS September 16, 1992 Page 2 LA r'CO No. 2625 - Application to annex approximately 3,700 acres of territory in the area generally located north of our existing City limits, west of Etiwanda Avenue, and east of Milliken Avenue. Property owner support would be required for annexation approval. The application is pending. LAFCO No. 2626 - Application to annex approximately 2,556 acres of territcry in the area generally located north of our existing City limits, easy of Etiwanda Avenue, and west of the existing City boundary of Fontana. Property owner support would be required for annexation approval. This application was technically terminated because of the failure of property tax exchange negotiations. 11NALYSIS: Property owners continue to oppose annexation. Supervisor Jon Mikels was contacted regarding the subject annexations and he specifically requested that the City terminate all annexation actions regarding the City's Sphere-of-Influence. Because of property owner and County opposition, the Council aub-cammittee concurs. Therefore, the sub-committee recommends that the Council, by minute action, di rent staff to withdraw the pending applications, LAFCO No. 2624 and LAFCO No. 2625, and request that LAFCO return to the City any remaining funds on deposit. Respectfully subm1i tted.`j,(n[.,'~ Dennis L. Stout Mayor Chuck euquet Council Member DLE:Ce:mlg Attachments: Ezb.ibit "A" - Vicinity Map 'r) LEC m~~nuu SPECIFIC PLAN 9001 E71W'ANDA NORTH ~ nNNEXATION 90-01 =_> 1235 ACRE AREA PROPOSED -•`) - TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LAFCO 2620 1 y PROPOSED TO DE ANNEXED INTO 'PHE CITY L . ANNEXATION 90(12 =_> 3000 ACRES LAFCO 2625 nNNEXATION 91).07 =_> 2576 ACRES LAFCO 2b26 U EXISTING CIT}' SPHERE OF INFLUENCE CITY OF EtANCFIO CUCAMONGA ITLM: nNNExn'ru)N vo-oz & •03 { 'CANNING DNiS10N TrrLr•.: VICIN ITY NAP ~ ~5Z BXHI61l': "A" SCALE: NONE TY OF RANCHO CUCA1tONGA RGDEVELOPMF.NT AGF;NCY STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst ~~ 5 ~~ . _) ~~ SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF TENANT LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CfI'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB. Approve the proposed lease agreement with Valley Baseball Club and authorize the Mayor to execute the lease. In 1990, the Council approved the concept of seeking a minor league baseball team as a tenant for the stadium located in the Sports Complex. A series of deal points were developed as a basis for the lease agreement, and negotiations began with Valley Baseball Club. Pursuant to previous Council direction, [he proposed lease agreement has been prepared. ANAL•YSiS The proposed (ease agreement, shipped under separate cover, incorporates the following provisions, which are consistent with the deal points Council previously reviewed. • "Rancho Cucamonga" will be used in the name of the team. • Team will lease the stadium facility from the City for 10 years, beginning in 1993, for a base rent amount of $50,000. This base rent will increase in years 6 - ]0 to $60,000. • The City will receive a "participation rent" from gross revenues which increases as the sales at the stadium increase. Thus as the team is more successful, the City will receive a greater participation September 16, 1992 Suf( Report -Stadium Lease Page 2 in the gross revenues. Pursuant to Council direction, gross revenues do not include any revenues from the sale of alcoholic beverages. • The team will designate a family section in the stadium, consisting of a minimum of 100 seats. No smoking nor consumption of alcoholic beverages will be permitted in this section. The team will provide opportunities for community events, such as "Say No to Drugs" or "Stay In School" rallies. The terms of the lease are consistent with other existing team lease agreements in minor league baseball. The California League owners unanimously approved the move to Rancho Cucamonga at their annual meeting. The proposed lease agreement will also require approval by Major League Baseball, which is expected within 30 days. Respectfully sub//m~~itted, i,~CAtda.; oCn n(`~~Ct..~tL~y Linda D. Daniels Deputy Director 53 ~ Date: September 16, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Jerry Fulwood, Acting Community Services Director Subject: Appeal of Fee Waiver -Windrows Neighbors Group Staft recommends denial of the $40.00 waiver since the fee was appropriately applied. BACKGROUND Sound monitoring is a procedure adopted by the City Councl after numerous and continued complaints from residents living near parks regarding amplified sound activities. The monitoring procedure is a way to insure amplified activities are kept to the sound level limits established for parks. The fees regarding sound monitoring in parks are as follows. Sound Monitoring Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 n/a $10.00 $10.00 $26.75 $26.75 $35.00 Windrows Neighbors Group falls into the category of Group 2: "City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidates night." When staff first discussed their pending use of Windrows Park the organizers were told about two things. Pirst, that Windrows is anon-reservable pazk for pirnic purposes, however, since this is an annual community special event a permit could be issued. Secondly, that since they would be having a D.J. amplifying music a sound monitoring charge would be in effect. The organizers asked for a waiver. Staff said that a letter must be written to request the waiver and that it would need to go to the City Council since only they can waive fees. This was discussed with the organizers in late July. 4 Appeal of Fee Waiver -Windrows Neighbors Gtoup September 16, 1992 Page Two The application with the waiver was received in Community Services September 1st which provided no time for the item ro be placed on the September 2nd City Council Agenda. On September 1st, staff called the organizers and told them that the waiver could not be on the council Agenda until September 16th which was after their event and that payment should be made. At that point the organizer said they would go ro the City Council on September 2nd with their concerns. City Council requested the item be agendized for the September 16th meeting. espectfully Su ttted, ~F~ d,~~//tk"11`Y Acting Community Services DSrecror JF:ks rJS Y VP' iSANUHV GUCAMUNI:A MEMORANDUM DATE: September 16. 1992 TO: President and Members of the Fire azd Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, Clty Clerk ~~~ SUBJECT: FIRE DISTRICT CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS DS AND D4 Please note that the August Monthly Expenditure Report listed in item D3 should indicate an amount of $417,504.82 Instead of $122,040.39. Please note that [he August Monthly Expend/tune Report for item D4 should tndlcate an amount of $122,040.39 Instead of $417,504.82. /dJa cc: James Mazkman. Legal Counsel YELLOW CAB CO. 1 ACO EAST M19SION BOLILE V4R0 POMONA CALIFORNIA 917e8 I>"AI 622-t 313. (7tAj 9e6-1~3e September 14, 1992 To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancno Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: Since I was not allowed to speak at the public hearing regarding the adoption of Ordinance #501 regulating "taxi service", I am submitting the following information for your consideration before your final adoption and also the copy of my disallowed comments at the public hearing (Exhibit #1). Exhibit #2 is a copy of my letter to Mr. Duane Baker dated May 11, 1992. I respectfully request that an amendment be made to Section 8.30.060. Annual reapplication is burdensome, redundant and unnecessary for the already approved taxi companies and cumbersome for the city. Perini to to operate a taxi company should automaeically renew if the annual business license is paid, unless otherwise revoked according to Section 8.30.060. Also, taxi company permits should be transferable upon City council approval. Regarding Section 8.030.070 (the taxi driver permit requirement), following are some of the pertinent issues. We have approximately 40 taxicabs serving Patts of two county areas and 11 cities. The taxi industry experiences a very high turnover of drivers for many reasons. A few of those reasons are: (1) Long hours of work with relatively low earnings. (2) For many workers, we are the employer of last resort. Many drive taxicabs to avoid welfare and then return to the ir regular trade or ]ob as soon as possible. (3) Undesirable hours anfl days of work; potentially dangerous work. (4) Some people try it and lust don't like the work. GS-RC9.14.92 City of Rancho Cucamonga September 14, 1992 Page 2 we have approximately 508 of our core dedicated professional taxi drivers that enjoy the work and have worked here safely for many years. However the turnover rate of the oL'her 508 is constant and intense causing us to constantly recruit and train taxi drivers. :his year at our current rate we will recruit and trair, approximately 200 new drivers. Since most of these drivers start with us at the end of their financial resources, it would be virtually impossible to recruit taxi drivers if they had to purchase a taxi driving permit in every city and both counties (l.e, 13 X S25.00 = $325.00) plus the time involved, just to be able to begin driving a taxicab. Additionally, approximately 100 ^urrent drivers would be required to be fingerprinted within 60 days. All of our drivers are fingerprinted and permitted under the Pomona taxicab ordinance by the Pomona Police Department. Each driver is checked at fingerprinting for any outstanding arrest warrants, fingerprints sent to the Department of Justice and then forwarded to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Drivers are screened for any convictions for moral turpitude, narcotics and felonies. There have been no problems or criminal incidents involving any of our taxi drivers agnlnat the public or against a taxi customer, using this centralized process and procedure for the past 35 years A monthly taxi driver list with permit numbers is mailed to each law enforcement agency for each city by Yellow Cab Co. (Exhibit #3) The Pomona Police Department agreed to act as a central taxi. driver information base and clearing house. Permit information is always available in the records department through Sher Ramirez or her supervisor Judy Julian (714) 620-2161. They will cooperate and disseminate any taxi driver information to any law enforcement agency upon request. This procedure over the past 35 years has eliminated redundant fingerprinting and permitting. This has saved countless hours, travel, resources and unnecessary costs for the municipalities and our drivers. To properly resolve this issue, additional language could be added to the City Ordinance per the Model Ordinance, which I have given you. Or, the following language, "A driver operating a taxicab for a Rancho Cucamonga licensed taxi company shall not be required to have a driver's permit under this chapter if such has a valid permit or license from a city or county which requires an individual driver's permit or license and is acceptable and approved by the City Manager or the Chief of Police." GS-RC4.19.92 City of Rancho Cucamonga September 14, 1992 Page 3 I also respectfully request that you adopt a section for determination of public convenience and necessity. This is absolutely critical if Rancho Cucamonga is going to have a long term viable taxi service as outlined in your government code. Then the City would be in compllance with the spirit of the state policy of Section 53075.5 Section 1, (A),(B),(C) and (D) of your government code. (Exhlbit #4) Finally, attached is a coDY of an editorial article from the August, 1992 issue of the Airport Ground Transportation Association Newsletter. (Exhibit #5). The editor of this newsletter is Mr. Ray A. Mundy, Ph.D, whose full time }ob is the Department Head of the Institute for Transportation Studies at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. _ Thank you for your consideration in these matters. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, Gene Stalians President GS:va Attachments GS-RC9.14.92 (EXEIIBIT ql) COMMENTS THAT WERE NOT PERMITTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council My name is Gene Stalians, president of Yellow Cab Co at 1400 E. Mission Blvd., Pomona. Yellow Cab Co. is a locally owned small business and not affiliated with other Yellow Caba or taxi companies anywhere else. The taxicab is a very small but important element in the economic and transportation vitality of a city. Taxicabs Dlay many vital roles for the City. Taxicabs provide accessible transportation to disabled people, provide safe late night Cranait for low income nightworkers, provide r~ergency transportation for low income families, and comprehensive transit service day and night for the entire community. No other form of public transit serves as many needs in all weather conditions, 26 hours a Bay, every day of the year. Taxis are the high quality transit safety net for the community. Due to the limited and small taxi mozket, cities should GS-RC9.14.92 encourage, support and protect a safe, responsible and effective taxicab company. City government cooperation is necessary if a taxicab company is to remain profitable yet operate within enforceable standards for responsibility, safety and effectiveness, 24 hours per day, seven (7) days per week. The regulation or lack of taxicab regulation has a profound and complex effete on the type and quality of service provided. Taxicab public utility ordinances were designed and implemented to guarantee avaiiabili ty, Safety and pricing equity for the riding public. A proper and highly regulated taxicab environment is very important to the pri.~ary users of this service. ;li Low income households = 408 (2) Households with no motor vehicle = 428 (3) Disabled (require aseletance in making their taxi trip) = 68 (4) The more affluent use texlcaba less than poorer riders as a group (5) Elderly (over 70 years old) = 10-118 (61 Female (about 408) (7) Unemployed riders = 2$ Reasons that they ride a taxi (1) No alternative 398 GS-RC9.19.92 (2) Unfamiliar with area 68 (3) hot feeling well 1$ (4) Safety 4~ (5) Trip paid for by others 4$ (6) Convenience 35~ (7) other reasons 11$ Taxicabs are a public utility and should be regulated and recognized at such tonight. Every rate increase eliminates more of the lower economic end of the riding public including the elderly and handicaPPed, Zt is imperative that you recognize the importance of the poverty level transit user and the economic hardships and realities that affect the delivery of taxicab service. If you fail to recognize local taxi service as a Dublic utility, you will be introducing irreversible damage to low cost, efficient, effective, safe and available service to the citizens in the future. A comprehensive taxi ordinance allows the city to maintain 26 hour effective levels of service and Snsure quality service at the lowest possible cost. Please do no[ underestimate the importance of the facts that tha city has had no complaints or police pro6lema with taxicab service. This is not accidental or merely good luck. This resulted due to Yellow Cab Co.'s dedication to delivery of GS-RC9.14,92 quality, responsive, responsible, safe service, 24 hour per day, seven (7) days per week. This is only accomplished by continual, intense, serious management effort and commitment to the public need and necessity. Rancho Cucamonga has been receiving the benefits of responsible city ordinances enacted and supported by neighboring cities. WiChout those cities` support we would not be a full service taxi company today, in Rancho Cucamonga or anywhere else. Taxicabs are unique and not like any other enterprise in Rancho Cucamonga, however the closest analogy would be an ambulance service. The taxicab business has peculiar problems that, if not handled properly, can cause extreme herdahip on all those who rely on the transportation, those who regulate it as well as the taxicab companies, their drivers and employees. Taxicab companies are high riek investments with constant cash flow requirements. The state and federal governments recognize that this valuable resource should be saved. Rancho Cucamonga has a proper and legal role in regulating entry to control wasteful duplication and destructive competition. As you know we are currently servicing the City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week, with an unsubsidized taxi service and have done so for over 25 years. On behalf of our customers, drivers, employees and company, I respectfully request that you adopt a comprehensive taxi GS-RC9,14.92 ordinance so that Rancho Cucamonga can control taxi meter rates, and service standards, 24 hours per day, seven (7i days per week, responsiveness and accountability to ensure a viable taxicab environmene now and in the future. We now have some economies of scale which enable us to provide round-the-clock service. If we are to survive, we must Sncrease fleet productivity. bividing it continually will be very counter productive for the user, city, public transportation, our drivers, employees and our company. Allowing unwarranted competition will not service the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, public convenience and necessity or long term interest. when a transportation decision is made the facts must become known as to who will be helped, who or what may be hurt, what it will cost and who will have to Day for it. The system should be efficient, desirable and support the social, economic and environmental goals. Policies implemented without prudence will be disruptive. Sometimes things may have to be sacrificed in one area to achieve benefits in another, sacrifices and trade-off must 6e made in a well-informed way. over the years the taxi business has steadily been changing like other Darts of our society. Taxi service delivery has also become more complex, expensive and more delicately balanced. Equipment has become increasingly expensive, acquiring qualified labor at lower cost Se more difficult, time consuming anfl expensive, record keeping required by federal, state and local government is more voluminous, more costly to assimilate GS-RC9.14.92 accurately and store. Insurance costs for liability and workers compensation has escalated beyond any reasonable degree, now consuming almost 248 of our company revenue and forecasted to increase even more. The reason there are taxicab ordinance regulations in over 888 of the United States cities, is that these cities recognize that major improvements could not be realized under the then prevalent conditions of unbridled competition, unrestricted entry, uncertainty of tenure and underPinanced establishments. The city ordinances eliminated unsatisfactory operations, encouraged merger of competitors and promoted investment in new and larger enterprises. As necessary inducements, the public convenience ordinance gives assurance of city support to satisfactory taxi operators granting them the first opportunity to provide additional service if required, or limited time to correct service defects, if any. Because of a taxicab's visibility, soma people easily gain the impression that taxi's reap a golden harvest. On the contrary, taxi operations are more apt to be marginal due to the peaks and valleys i.n the time of day and days of the month and providing service 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. So what may appear to be a lucrative Pree-wheeling monopoly turns out, on closer examination, to be rather a severely restricted and conditional pre Pe rential right which is both an obllgati.on and a privilege. The Cali ^_ornia Legislature recognized thet the free market is not GS-RC9.14.92 a good allocator of taxicab service. Government Code. Section 53075.5 sets forth that every City or County shall adopt ordinances or codes establishing an entry policy. It is the policy of the State to promote and/or provide safe and reliable Privately operated taxicab services as an essential government service. The legislative intent is ORDERLY regulation. and ECONOMIC VIABILITY AND STABILITY as the essential requirements. The City has the right and obligation to set forth need and necessity and entry requirements. The premise of unwarranted entry sounds good but there is much trouble when it is carried out. It seems like a nice simple answer to a very complex problem and in today's real world, unfortunately, there seems to be few simple answers to our complex and varied problems. it's nice to say but not very realistic. Competition in the taxi business has just the opposite effect that it does in moat other business. There are no benefits and no positive results --- only negative results such as increased costs and less service, etc. Most taxi ordinances when adopted did not define Public Convenience and Necessity because there were so many complaints, ]unky cabs, poor service, low caliber anfl undesirable drivers, law enforcement problems, lack of responsibility by drivers and lack of accountability by companies that were poorly managed, etc. that the reason for public convenience and necessity clauses GS-RC9.14.92 were clear to them. The adopted City ordinances cured these problems and the City administration apparently believed that history would be remembered. These facts are very difficult to convey, as well as for some Feople to grasp because competition serves us and works so well in businesses that have a real market, but a pure market for taxi service does not exist. Because people absolutely do not have to ride a taxi no matter how many companies or taxis there are, the demand does not increaxe. People do not sell their cars or leave them parked to use a taxi. Another reason this concept is hard to understand is that these market imperfections are very subtle, seemingly minor and appear as small nuances, but collectively they dramatically change the nature of the taxi enterprise from other types of businesses. our taxi meter rates have been developed and justified over many years ar. public hearings before city councils. Our rates include 24 hour dispatchers, a $47,000 telephone system, two-way radio communications, management staff, five mechanics and a full service garage and back-up taxicabs, radios, meters, etc. There is only about 30 calls per day in Rancho Cucamonga which will support about 1 1/2 taxicabs. There Ss simply not enough business in Rancho Cucamonga to support a full service taxi company. Continual dilution of cur revenue will be devastating GS-RC9.14.92 to our company. Studies have shown that more companies and taxi's actually decrease the taxi market and increase meter rates 30~ to 70~, Hope is a poor substitute for certainty that a viable responsible taxi service Can survive. Taxi Service delivery and equitable regulation is successful when continual involvement in the pursuit of quality, responsive and safe service is being realized for the benefit of the citizens--rather than at their expense. Cities also discovered, much to their dismay that bad decisions were virtually impossible to reverse. I reapec tfully request that you adopt a comprehensive taxicab ordinance. i will be happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you. GS-RC9.14.92 (EXHIBIT # 2) DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT~ INC. 1 A00 EgfiT MISSION 60ULEV<RO POMON4 C4L1FOgN1A H 176e (7ta~622-13 tfi •(~1AJ 886-1136 May 11, 1992 Mr. Duane Baker City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Baker: it is difficult to convey the sense of importance and ramifications of your decision of whether you should adopt a taxi ordinance for the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga. The taxicab business is a unique industry with peculiar problems that if not handled properly can cause extreme hardship on all those who rely on the transportation and those who regulate it ae well as the individual taxicab companies. The taxi industry in California and nationwide ie now exeeriencinq traumatic operating and financial ditficultiea. Taxicab companies are high risk investments with constant cash flow zequlrementa. There have been many city, state and federal taxi industry studies end analyses over the years. The reason for the federal and state interest end study was to try and avoid the demise of this industry ae in the case of private city bus operators. The government recognizes this valuable resource should be saved. Rancho Cucamonga has a proper sad legal role in regulating entry to control wasteful duplication and destructive competition. The state of California Government Code Chapter 1260, Section 53075.5 sets forth that every City or County shall adopt ordinencea oz codes eatabliahing ari entry policy and rates for taxicab operations. It is the policy of the State to promote and/or provide safe and reliable privately operated taxicab services as an essential government service. The 1eg181ative intent of the code for taxicab operations Se ORDERLY regulation and ECONOMIC VIABILITY AND STABILITY of privately operated taxicab service ae the essential requirements. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has the right and obligation to set forth aspects relating to taxicab operations for meter rates, liability insurance levels, workers's compensation Insurance, hours of operation, color, vehicles, meter certifications, etc. including but not limited Co need and neceaelty and entry requirements. Mr. Duane Baker City of Rancho Cucamonga May 11, 1992 Page 2 Our taxi company is an integral part of public passenger transportation. Our company has worked in concert with local and state agencies because we recognized that private and public interface would be necessary in the planning and activation of a balanced transportation system and service. Unwarranted entry must be viewed with caution in order to avoid elimination of existing taxi service as a result of economic dislocations. The taxi industry is a risky business, cabs are driven on average about 80,000 miles annually---more than five times the normal average for passenger vehicles. As a result, cabs unable to get voluntary insurance are assigned to a risk pool. Hut that coverage is available only at 1nLlated rates, which supposedly reflect the numerical risk calculated by the insurance industry. Economies of scale must be maintained to provide round-the-clock service to increase fleet productivity. protection against unwarranted competition will serve the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga's public convenience necessity or long term interest. When a transportation decision la made the Lacta must become known as to who will be helped, who or what may be hurt, what it will cost and who will have to pay for it. The system should be efficient, desirab'.e and support the social, economic and environmental goals. Policies implemented without prudence will be disruptive. Sometimes things may have to be sacrificed in one area to achieve benefits in another. Sacrifices and trade-offs must be made in n well-informed way. Regulation of transportation companies la intended to Drotact the public from abuses that may occur Sn a free market situation. The city of Rancho Cucamonga needs regulations to work of Liciently and protect the Dublic intezeat in the manner originally intended economically and in Quality of service in the city. A properly managed taxi Company devotes considerable management time daily to ensure smooth, safe, dependable, reliable transportation. Dispatchers continually monitor the locations oL all drivers to ensure adequate taxicabs in a city at all times. The success of these efforts ie verified by virtually no Complaints. OIVfA~IRl~O PApATR4N~1T. INC. A Trensporteuon SarviCe end Menegemant Firm Mr. Duane Baker City of Rancho Cucamonga May ll, 1992 Page 1 The city of Rancho Cucamonga does not need "taxi problems" and disruption. Some of these problems include rude drivers, drivers refusing short trips, unsafe and old equipment, excessive taxicabs trying Lo service the city, bandit (unlicensed) taxis, fare gouging, drivers taking ',onger routes to run up the meter, and the list goes on. These cause tremendous problems for the riders, city officials and the local taxicab company. Control of entry is extremely critical due to the limited market, revenue and also to the already intensive competition of the private automobile and public subsidized transportation. In addition to the already comps Citive situation, the threat Chat a new firm may enter forces a company to be cost conscious and sensitive to the public which is why regulated taxi rates over the years have been lower than deregulated cities. Quality of service regul atlon is a proper government role to insure the safety, health and financial liability protection for the public welfare. Unwarranted competition will cause lack of ability to break even with user charges alone, which will ultimately lead to little or no service. The only eventual alternative would be to subsidize the service desired as is currently being done in some communities. Transportation is necessary for everyone and some form of basic transportation should be available to people who need it. Taxis do that 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in Rancho Cucamonga, which is not an easy low coat thing to do. Rancho Cucamonga has a proper and legal role in regulating entry to control wasteful duplication and destructive competition. Taxicabs are currently being impacted by very intense competition from many governmental agencies and privets non-profit corporations which basically give transportation away or provide it at a very low user cost. A great number of social service agencies provide transportation services for their clientele. Commissions on aging, local economic opportunity agencies and public transit systems like Omnitrana provide and tailor their transport services to a clientele. This clientele may be Che same and may be receiving multiple or uncoordinated transportation services from a number of agencies. An unsubsidized taxi becomes transit of the last resort because users must pay all the cost which, by user comparison, seems Coo expensive. If a taxi company is to remain viable, it must maintain some economies of scale to try and overcome the harmful cumulative effects of a series of federnl, state, regionnl and local actions that individually appear insignificant. ONeq~IWll~ PApATgANOT, INC. A Treneporceaon Service end Menegement Fmm Mr. Duane Baker City o£ Rarcrio Cucamonga May 11, 1992 Page 4 A taxi company is a quasi public utlli ty and some states recognize the taxi industry as a utili t~~ and regulate St as such. Rancho Cucamonga has the responsibility to take the authority so [hat the closest relationship between the decision-makers and the public is attained. The taxi business is not a free enterprise; it is a utility, Every aspect sh Auld be controlled and regulated. in some states tail companies are exempt from gasoline taxes the same as public bus operations. Diversity in population, geography, economy, lifestyles and needs must all be considered. A poorly run, badly managed, insenaitlve taxi company should not be protected. A taxi ordinance allows examination of these Sssues and is very appropriate. IE, under examination, a taxi company has not fulfilled its responsibility, it should have 24-hour, 7-day Der week competition. on the other hand, if a taxi company provides the desired service, the city owes it protection from unwarranted competition. The issue of allowing the city to intervene in the case of another taxi company desiring Lo operate Sn the city of Rancho Cucamonga is very complicated and inter-related with Dubllc passenger transportation in Rancho Cucamonga and the Weat Hnd. Diverting income to additional taxi companies will only compound taxi problems and as the cost of doing business Sncreasee, lead to higher rates since only 7/10 0£ 1+! of passenger tripe are taken in public transportation systems in San Bernardino County. Regulation has an important impact on drivers and employees. Labor is a resource. Labor Ss people. They need renaonable assurance that they won't lose their jobs. Productivity in taxi transports tion is a complicated mixture of many things. Por example, technology, the demand for service, the type and number of workers needed such as management, dispatchers, bookkeepers, drivers and mechanics, the speed that vehicles can travel, the length of Crips, etc. Government has subsidized or taken over transportation services that have gone Snto decline. This is true of nearly all city bus companies. Government generally has determined that transportation is vital and needs to be available to allow transit dependents the continuing and on-going ability to get around as well as occasional and emergency users. Some people prefer not to hitchhike in an emergency at odd times o! the day or night. DIVCgstlRllD PAAATi7ANe1T, INC. A TrensporteaOn Serwce end MeneBement Firm Mr. Du are Baker City of Rancho Cucamonga May 11, 1992 Page 5 The City must decide and determine the trade-cffs in priorities. The competition for capital is increasing. When lenders make capital available to a company, it must be with the assurance that trie taxi company has the support and confidence of the community it serves and the possibility of being profitable. Transportation mobility has many important social impacts and provides a vital Feature in our lifestyles. All modes of transportation work harmoniously together to service the needs of residents efficiently. If inefficiencies and duplication of effort occur it may be harmful to the total system. Taxi service is essential to the daily activities of some people who cannot solely rely on private automobiles for personal mobility, because they do not own or cannot operate one. Some financially disadvantaged find it difficult or impossible to own and operate a car because of their limited income. Some elderly and handicapped individuals are unable to drive because of physical and in most cases, financial limitations. Theft eccesa to bus lines, employment, shopping and other services is seriously restricted. The most cost-effective alternative Se the one that produces the maximum net benefit to Rancho Cucamonga. The position in favor of non-regulation/free entry is based on the erroneous assumption that additional competition would increase the number of riders and would correspondingly reduce costa. Nothing could be further from actual conditions. The historical pattern In Southern California has been that in those area& of multiple operations Che stronger companies have absorbed the weaker ones, or rates have increased dramatically. This is a result of economic necessity. if you allow unwarranted competition, turnover oP companies increases, the dependability of service decreases and the effort necessary to maintain protection for Che public is increased substantially. I respectfully request you adopt a city ordinance to allow for finding public convenience and necessity before issuance of any additional taxicab licensee. Unwarranted taxi competition Sn Rancho Cucamonga will create instability, eventual deterioration to Door or no service and potential for personal discrimination. Regulation studies have shown that there is a bitter economic lesson of harsh and unnecessary cost associated with excess capacity. Are taxi companies in Rancho Cucamonga going to compete only during busy days at heavy user times or 24 hours qer day, 7 days Der weak including all holidays like Christmas Day? OIV@q BIFIBO PAggTF1AN@IT, INC. A Treneporteticn Sarvica entl Menegemenc Firm Mr. Duane Baker City of Rancho Cucamonga May :1, 1992 gage 6 The reason there are taxicab ordinance regulations in over 88>& of the United States cities, is that these cities recognize that major improvements could not be realized under Che then prevalent conditions of unbridled competition, uncertainty of tenure and underfinanced establishments. The ci^.y ordinances eliminated unsatisfactory operations, encouraged merger of competitors and promoted investment in new and larger enterprises. As necessary inducements, the public convenience ordinance gives assurance of city support to satisfactory taxi operators granting them the first opportunity Lo provide additions' service if required, or limited time to correct service defects. if any. These ordinances and procedures have been attacked many times from sources inside and outside the 4overnment, but with the support of the public and responsible government leaders, this method of regulation has been defended successfully as being in the Public interest. Because of a texicab's visibility, soma people easily gain the impression that taxi's reap a golden harvest. on the contrary, taxi operations are more apt to be marginal due to the peaks and valleys in the time of days and days of the month and providing service 26 hours per day, 365 days per year. So what may appear to be a lucrative free- wheeling monopoly turns out, on closer examination, to be rather a severely restricted and conditional D=eferential right which is both an obligation and a privilege. The premise of unwarranted entry sounds good but there is much trouble when it is carried out. It seems like a nice simple answer to a very complex problem and in todny's real world, unfortunately, there seems to be few simple answers to our complex and varied problems. It's nice to say but not very realistic. And, finally, the governmental competition in transportation is becoming very intense and by every indication will increase at a greater and faster rate in the near future. In San Bernardino County at least 80 different transportation programs have been identified by SANBAG in addition Co Omnltrans. Ven Go and vans with wheelchair lifts are positive transit programs funded and mandated by the state and Federal governments. The April 1976 Elderly and Handicapped Regulations require all UMTA grantees to develop plans to meet the special transportation neefle of these persons. Since many of these people require door-to-door service, paratransit is a necessary consideration. DIVQq~IFIQD PAgATRAN~IT~ INC. A Treneporcetian Service end Management Frm Mr. nuane Baker City of Rancho Cucamonga May 11, 1992 Page 7 As you know, we are currently servicing the city of Rancho Cucamonga 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with an unsubsidized taxi service and have done so for many years. On behalf of our company and employees I respectfully request that the city adopt a taxi ordinance to regulate this valuable service. The ordinance will prevent the indiscriminate granting of. a license to another unwarranted competing taxi company. The adoption of the ordinance will directly relate to our company's welfare and our ability to operate public passenger transportation 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. The city has everything to lose and nothing to gain by not incorporating a taxi ordinance into the city. i appreciate the opportunity to 91ve you this SnLormatlon; SL I can be of further assistance, please let me know. L have been in the taxi business in this area for 35 years and was Drealdent of the International Taxicab Association during 1987 and 1988. If needed, i can provide documentation of this information. Also, since I live in Rancho Cucamonga, I have been very Dlea88d with the growth and quality improvements Lor this col~unlty. A comprehensive taxicab ordinance will Lurther these city goals. Sincerely, Gene R. Stalians President GRS:va OIV^p/IAI^O PAiiATRAN/IT, IPIC. A Treneportecion Service and Menegement Firm (EXHIBIT #3) - YELLOVO/ Cr1B CO. aco enar n.«ee~oni e«nenao vonnoNn cwwwr~w epee (>14)82E1313• (>t OJ e96-113e To the Chief of Police Attached is a current listing of drivers for Yellow Cab Co. My records you need on specific drivers are held with the Chief of Police of the City of Pomonn whose office has agreed to act as a central taxi driver information base and clearing house. Pezmlt information is always available throu4h that office in the Police Records Department. Your contact would be Sher Ramirez or her supervisor Judy Julian (714) 620-2161. This procedure has been In effect for approximately 30 yeaz8 and as a result has saved time, resources, unnecessary costa of multiple fln4erprintinq, and staff time for the titles and our drivers. The City of Pomona has agreed, to cooperate and disseminate any taxi driver information .to any Other law enforcement agency as requested. Every applicant to drive a taxi is reiected it they have been convicted of a felony, moral turpitude or a narcotics offense. Piease feel free to call i! you have any questions or problems regarding this information. Mr. Jay Camp, Operations Manager is available to answer any questions. Sincerely, Gene R. Stallana President GRS:va GS-Permit-Cv YELLOW CAB CO. 1aop EPST MIBBgrv eouLEVaRo POMONh C.4L.IFORMII B1 "!6e (71 al e2E-1313. (A aj gBe-1 ~ 3e Yellow Cab Company - Driver Taxi Permit List List of Drivers & Permit Numbers for Yellow Cab Company as oP 06/30/92. Drivers marked with an ••• have applied for permit but it has not been issued AGBOOLA, BOLA ALEXANDER, KENNETH ARMSTRONG, CRAIG ••• A14286 A13677 AUSTIN, ROBERT HAIRD, GREGORY BARNARD, CLENN ••• A13158 ••• BASS, EDWARD BLESSING, HYRON BUCHANAN, BZLLZE :•• ••• A13430 BURNETT, GARY HUSCH, DAVID BUTTERPIELD, DAVID A9132 "•' ••" CARRIGAN, STEVEN CZMINSKI, PAUL CONNOLLY, EDWARD ••• A14174 A14345 CORNWELL, EUGENE CROW, ROBERT CUELLAR, ARTHUR A12941 Ai1718 A14404 DANE, JERRY DAVZS, RICK DIAZ, EVARIST ••• A14527 .. •'• DOUGHTY, KEVIN ELDRIDGE, RALPH ESPINOSA, RICHARD A14138 A12616 A14418 EVANS, LINDA FLAHERTY, GERALD PLETCHER, PARRY A7656 A108dd ••' FORD, RICHARD NAEGELE, DAVID HALLDANE, ANDREW A11264 A126d1 A11562 HOPKINS, ERNEST HOWELL, MICHAEL IMRAN, MUHAMMA A13928 A12883 A13293 JOHNSON, MARSHAL KALLMAN, KARL KERN, MICHAEL A12858 A14305 ••• KILIC, MURAT LANDAY, CHRIS LAWRENCE, STEVE ••• ••• A13103 LONGWORTH, DAVLD IARHIESKI, ELWIN MACFARLANE, KENNETH A1d476 A13846 A11929 MALIK, MOHAMMA MARlOrL, KIRK MARTIN, JOHN A12995 A13871 306975 MARTIN, NATHAN MATTOX, RONALD MCDONALD, JOHN A9714 A13159 A10602 u (EXHIBIT # 4) COMMON POWERS AND DUTIES §53076 Nom -There was anothQ seaitm d this aumt>er which wu added by Sran 1985 eh 1260 § 2 and renumbered § 33075.5 by Sots 1986 eh 248 § 87. § 53075.5. Ta3dcab transportation services (a) Notwithstanding Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 5351) of Division 2 of the Public Utilities Code every aty or county shall protect the public health, safety, and welfare by adopting an ordi- mace or resolution is regard to taxccab aaasportation service ren- dered in vehicle tiaigaed for carrying not more than eight persons, eacinding the driver, which is operated within the jltritdiction of the city or county. (b) Each aty or county shall provide for, but is not lfimited to providing for, the following: (I) A policy for entry into the business of providing taucab transpor- tation service. (2) The atabBshmmt or rxgisRation of rata for the provision of taxicab transportation service. (c) Each city or wuaty may levy service charges, fen, or assessments in as amount suffitamt to pay for the cosh of carrying out as ordinance or resolution adopted is regard to taricab ti'anspoRation service pursuant to this section, Added Stan 1983 ch 1260 § S as § 33073; Rreembere4 Stag i9t6 ch 248 487. Nam-Stan 1983 eh 1260 provides SECIION 1. The t.eptlanve Bads and deelsev the fo0owmp (a) The orderly reaoladoe d vehicoly tramc on the saexs am hi8hways of California b essential m the weltate d the rose and in people. (b) PtiratdY operand tadcab campotndoe service provides vital taatupaodtm lialn widths the sera sod between the state and the people and etamomic sYStems d the undue aed rho world. Tadnb oaasportadon renica o{aarod m the fides and eomdes etrabb the state to provide the betreBn d ptivatdy operued. damsod-rapoeove oaasportadaa senca to in pcapk and to pessam who aavd m Califortia for bnsieea or tourer posposa. (c) The eaoaomie visWity sed stabiGq d psivudy operand taaiab vatnpartadou serv~ee w comequmdY. a matter d aaewide rmpornots (d) The po0ry d this sum is m promom saPo and tsliabk peevatdy operated nsioob baesportadoe service m ceder m provide the bmeBa d the snviee fa krthec- aeca dthis policy. the I.eadume reoo8aites and aB4es that the te8uhdoe of peintdy operated taacb eaosportadon service is m essential Bov«ommtal fuocdoa § 53076. Permit to repair underground fuel storage tank No local agency shall deny a permit to repair as underground steel .. ...,_ a. _, ___...~ _... ., . (EXHIBIT #5) ARTICLE COPIED FROM THE AIRPORT GROUND TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER AucusT, 1992 The editor of this newsletter is Mr. Ray A. Mundy, Ph.D., whose full time job is the Department Dead of the Institute for Transportation Studies at the Dniversity of Tennessee in Knoxville. Taxicab r °E:~" . Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 NaM Mounlam Avmuc / P.D, Box 670 / Uplad, Cdi(omix 91785-3008 716y83-Off71 FAX: 71<N49-6700 September 14, 1992 Mr. Scott Murphy city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10050 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Carls' Jr. Restaurant - CUP 91-37 Central Park Plaza Rancho Cucamonga Dear Scott: I have received the staff report concerning Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.'s appeal of the Planning Commission decision pertaining to the awnings' color and design, as well as the landscaping condition. Lewis Homes Management Corp acting as agent for Lewis Development Co. is in full agreement with Carl's Jr. concerning these issues and hopes that the City Council will overturn the decision of the Planning Commission and let Chia restaurant proceed as soon as possible. We believe that the use of the Carl's Jr. trademark colors is important, and believe that the proposed awning in red with a gold trim works well with the other co).ors used in the center. As far as the shape of the awnings in question, awnings are generally used in areas on the architecture where these are sun control problems. We believe that the shape selected not only does this but also blends wall with Carl's Jr. architecture and that of the shopping center as a whole. I would remind the City Council that Chili's in Terra Vista Town Center was allowed to use their trademark colors on their awnings and this has not caused any major problem with the Planning Commission or staff that I'm aware of. Lastly, we agree with Carl's Sr. that additional specimen trees required by the Planning Commission at the exit from the drive- through are not necessary and may cause sight line problems for customers exiting into the drive aisle, thereby creating a potentially unsafe condition. Scott Murphy September 14, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Please see that this letter is delivered to the City Council for their Wednesday evening meeting. Thanks for your assistance in the matter. rdially M ch a L. s Proj c A MLL~blh cc: Lorenzo A. Reyes, Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. Richard Mager SEP 16 '92 02~42PM IXE Ia=AL/I ~ f r14) 4~, 11-4 l P,2 ~~~~ caRi~s fix. aesrauaaNTs ... .... ....... anwrn~aaxemwuc ImolVamte.m.eorae..d ro. era OW ao.eam, cruam.vwy43N mn'n4sr9s September 16, 1992 Mr. Scott Murphy CITY OF RABCMO CDCAMOR~A P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REFERERCE: CARL'8 TR. - CKE 1194-8Z C.D.p. i91-37 CENTRAL PARR PLAZA RANCAO COCANONGA, CA Dear Scott: ,~ y atv SEP 161992 ~,., ~8+9~10i11i1~'-~~3~5, Z Let this letter serve as a formal request to withdraw our appeal application C.U.P. F91-37, scheduled far City Council Hearinq September 16, 1992. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, CARL RARCMER SNTERPRISES L rnzo RyY $i a Deve ent Mana r LR:cn00020 Ul'I'Y UN' ttAlvci-1U CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 16, 1992 ~ .,ea 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Depuly City Manager `~~ SUBIECp: CORRECTIONS TO LEASE FOR BASEBALL TENANT Included in the Basebali Tenan! Lease, which you received September 10, 1992, were typos and errors which have since been cottected. The following is a summary of the page, section and corzection (in underline type) that has been made. page 2 - section (v) correction: lease the Stadium from City page 5 - section 4.03.2 correction: 8% of gross revenues exceeding $ 1 , 200, 00.1_, ... 10'90 of gross revenues exceeding $1,~00,00~ up to ... 15% of gross revenues over $1,800,00 page 5 -section 4.04 correction: ... parking fees, luxury box revenues, media revenues. prgyram calec, and sign (advertising) revenues, excluding revenues derived from scoreboard s onsors. page 29 -section 32. cottection: the reference [o Exhibit "D" has been eliminated and the text revised to include the manufacturer's model number of the scoreboard page 30 -section 34.01 correction: ... baseball game and other eventg operated... Exhibit C -Policy correction: I. Aeer is sold in uo to 16 ounce cups. cc: Jack Lam Iim Markman Debbie Adams CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 10, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Counefl Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMQ City Clerk ~~'-~ SUBJECT: ERECUTIVE SESSION -SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 We were notified late this afternoon (after the agenda had already been copied) by Jeff HIng, City Attorney's office, that an executive session is requested to take place at the conclusion of fhe CSty Council meeting of September 16. 1992. The topic is pending lltSgatfon with Morrow vs. City of Rancho Cucamonga. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jerry Nlilwood. /dJa