Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1992/10/07 - Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCII. AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR bfEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. October 7, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Cit7c Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 •». City Councibnembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councifm¢mber Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember •rt• Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, Ciry Cferk City Office: 9fl9-IA51 PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1992 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these Items Is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A GALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Buquei _, Alexander_,Stout _„ Williams _, and Wright B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONc 1. Presentotion of Proclamation to Lewis Homes RecognNng their donation to the Community Services Department. 2. Presentotion of Award to the Mayor and City Council from Southem California Emergency Services Association. 3. Presentation to the Mayor and Cdy Council of the Pedestrian Safety Award for Rancho Cucamonga by the Automobile Club of Southern California. 4 Presentotion of 'Greening of the Empire Award" }o the Rancho Cucamonga City Council from the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM TH cuar rr. This is the time and place for the general public to atldresa the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council tram addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter fora subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per indlvitlaal. I2. CONSENT CAI aNDAR The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non•contraversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. PAGE Cfiy Council Agenda October 7, 7992 2 t. Approval of Minutes: August 19, 1992 (Wight absent) September 2, 1992 September lb, 1492 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/9/92 and 9,r16/92: and 1 Payroll ending 9/ 10/92 for the total amount of S 1 A07.964.74. 3. Alcohalic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer & Wine Eating B Place for Satsuma Sushi, Judi}h and Shigeru Nogi and Holly A. and Koji Nakayama. located at 9950 Foothill Boulevard, #C. 4, Alcoholic Beverage Appiicaticn for On Sale Beer & Wine Eating 10 Place for Oriego's Restaurant, Robert O. and Gloria Ramirez and RoCrigo O. and Margarita Ramirez, IocCed at 7201 Archibald Avenue, Su,Ye 17. 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Eating Place 12 for fdicnoel J's Restaurants, Michael J's Caffee Shops. Incorporated. located at 10123 Foothill Boulevard. 6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sole General Eating Place 14 for Zendejas Mexican Restaurant, Rommen Resiaurgnis, Incorporated. located at 1945 Vineyard Avenue, #D7. 7. Alconolic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer & `Nine Eating 16 Place for Mandarin Garden & Yamafuji Japanese Restaurant, Evergreen Imperal Incorporated, located a18034 Haven Avenue. 8. Approval to expend 55,723.83 from Asset Secure Funds for Police 18 Equipment. 9. Approval of Appropriations from Fund 07 'Reimbursement/ 20 Calirans- in the amour} of 522,210,OG for Fiscal Year 1992/93 to cover anticipated contract services for qualifying reimbursable expenditures from Account No. 07-4647-6028. 10. Approval to Release Excess Funds for the Right-of-Way 21 Acquisition from Trust Account No. 70-726-500 for Parcel Map 11838, located on the northwest comer of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane, requested by Hughes Investments. 11. Approval }o Release a Portion of Funtls, Deposited under 22 Agreement CO 90-139. for payment of Southern Pacific Railway improvements a} Rochester Crossing to }he William Lyon Company in the amount of 530,000.00 from Trust Account No. Ill 27tr5 i0. PAGE Ctty Council Agenda October 7, 1992 3 RESOLUTION N0.92-254 23 A RESOLIAION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RELEASE OF A PORTION OF FUNDS DEPOSITED BV THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY 12. Approval to name persons authored to execute on behclf of the 24 City the application for obtaining Federal Financial Assistance under P.L. 93-288 invoNing the June, 1992. Landers/Big Bear Earthquakes. RESOLUTION NC. 92-255 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. NAMING PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY THE APPLICATION FOR OBTAINING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER P.L. 93-285 INVOLVING THE JUNE, 1992, LANDERS/BIG BEAR EARTHQUAKES 13. Approval ro Destroy Records and Documen}s which are no 26 longer required as provided under Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION N0.92-256 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CRT' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMEM CODE SECTION 340;0 14. Approval to execute a Notice of Release of Lien for Real Property 51 Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Street Improvements releasing 6809 Hellman Avenue, located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, between 19th Street and Monte Vista Street, submitted by Loszlo and E2sebeih Vass. RESOLUTION N0.92-257 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM LASZLO AND ERZSEBETH VASS PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1992 4 15. Approval of Parcel Map 11640, located at the east corner of Tena 54 Vista Parkway East and Mountain View Drive and Summary Vacotion of a portion of Tena Visto Parkway East and Mountain view Drive Right-of-Wav. submitted by Lewis Homes. 56 RESOLUTION N0.92-258 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 11640 RESOLUTION N0.92-259 57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CfTV Of RP.NCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACA71ON OF A 6 FOOT WIDE S1RIP OF TERRA 'JISTA PARKWAY EAST AND MOUMAIN VIEW DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAV ALONG THE PROPERTY AT THE EAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE iW0 STREETS 16. Approval of Resolutian authoring submittal of Household 62 Hazartlous Waste Non-Discretionary Gront seeking reimbursement for the salaries of City Yard Employees staffing the Permanent Household Hazardous Waste Collection Si}e. 64 RESOLUTION NO. 92-260 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cf1V OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORI7JNG SUBMITTAL OF A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE GRANT TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD 17. Approval of Summary VacoTion of o Portion of Railroad Avenue 65 South, located on the south side of the Southern Pac'rfic Railroad Right-of-WOy between Day Creek Channel and The Future Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by the Rancho Cucamcngo Redevelopment Agency. RESOLUTICN N0.92.261 66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILV ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH PAGE Clty Council Agenda October 7, 1992 5 18. Approval To Order the Annexation to Lantlscdpe Maintenance 69 District No. 3B and Stree} Ughting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 89-04, located en the west side of Carnelian Street, north of 19th Street. submitted by Rancho Plaza, a CalAOmia General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 92-262 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI7V COUNCIL OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtdONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 89-04 (APN: 201-871-57 AND 58) 19. Approvol To execute Mills Act Agreement 92-O1 - Warren/Thorpe 73 House - a proposal to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce the property ?ar. an the historic property located at 6112 Hellman Avenue. Rancho Cucamonga-APN: 7062-381-05. ~. Approval }o execute Agreement for the Acquisition of Off-Site 85 Property between The Wattson Amo Company and the CRy of Rancho Cucamonga located at the northeast and northwest comers of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevartl. 21, Approvol to execute Application and Permit (CO 92-065) for use of 86 School Facilities wRh Chaffey Joint Union High School D'utrict for recreation classes to be heltl oT Attc Loma High School. 22. Approvol To execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 92- gg Obb) with Empire Economics to perform an updated Market Absorption Study on Community Facilities District BB-2, to be fundetl from Account No. 75-A 130-6028, not to exceed 54,500.OD. 23. Approval to execute a Soccer Officiating Agreement (CO 92-067) 90 between the City of Rcncho Cucamonga and the Inlantl Empire Soccer Referees Association in the estimated annual expenditure amount of $26.000.00 To be funded from Account No. 134563-602&4231-3664 24. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, 98 improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Disirct No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and b for Parcel Map 12959-7, located on the southeast comer of While Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, Submitted by Capeliino and Associates. PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 7992 6 RESOLUTION N0.92-263 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CRV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 72959-1 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 12959), IMPRCVEMENIC AGREEMEM. AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO.92-264 99 A RESOLU170N OF THE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12959-1 25. Approval to execute Improvement AgreemenT Extension for 102 Tract 10210, located on the north side of Almond Avenue west of Sapphire Street. submitted by Firsl Hotel Investment Corporation. RESOLUTION NO.92-265 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10210 26. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice 104 of Completion for Parcel Map 70295 -West Greenway Corridor extending from the northeost corner of Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue io West Greenway Park. Release: FoAhful Pertormance Bond S143,OOD.00 RESOLUTION N0.92-266 105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBL'C IMPROVEMEMS FOR FARCEi MAP 10295 - WEST GREENWAV CORRIDOR AND AUTHORRING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1992 7 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submdted. F ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The fallowing items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. L CONSIDERATION OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-02 -Approval of 106 an opplicotion to designate The Pearson Filling Statlon and Garoge. located at 12912 Foothill Boulevord, Rancho Cucamonga, as a Historic Landmark -APN: l ODC81-02 Cn NSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTA ASSESSM NT OF 106 DEMO ITI N Req I ST FOR TN PARSON FI I IN ~ STATION AND ARA E (A POT NTIA OCAL ANDMARK STAT_ E LANDMARK AND NATIONAI R ,I ' R I ,19 STR i T tRE) - A !aquas} to demolish a portion of the Pearson Filling Statlon and Garage, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard, Roncho Cucamongo -APN: 1 I/7(}061-02. The Historic Preservotion Commission recommends the preparation of a focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in order to best assess the odverse impact to }his resource. Other options shot could be considered include the issuance of a Mitigated Negotiva Declaration. RESOLUTION N0.92-267 160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-02, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE PEARSON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE, LOCATED AT 129 i2 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1100.061-02 PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 1992 9 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following Items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAG p' cTAFF REOORTc The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meating for public Input. 1, CONSIDERATION OF FOUNDERS DAY PARADE MODIFICATIONS FOR 162 1992 AND 1993 AS RECOMMENDED 8V THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND EXECUTION OF GON°RACTS l•: TH PA ANTftV PRODUCTIONS (CO 92-068) FOR Sb 968 89 AND ALTA LOMA HI H SCHOOL (CO 92-069) FORS 120 75 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO.OI-q59 -a9pp-q 2~-u FOR PARADE SERVICES I. COUNCi~, BUSINESS The following Items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submtted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT M crlur. This is the time for City Council to identify the Items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These Items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meating. PAGE City Council Agenda October 7, 7992 g K. COMM INICATIl1NC FRAM TNG DuGI Ir This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council }rom addressing any issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and sat the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be I(mited to Rve minutes per individual. i. REQUEST FROM FOREST HINDI V OF N9 ONlS (`OA M I(vlTV 172 C'H IR H TO ~P AK A8O R TH ADDITION OF 4M ~ OAI(S .IiOO TO THEIR FAOILIN L. ADJOURNMEuT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS ANO PENDING LITIGATION. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby cenity tn21 a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 1, 1992, seventy-two {72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Cotle 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. August 19, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C[TY COIJNCe. MINUTES A regular mceUng of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga waz held on Wednesday, August 19, 1992 in the Council Chambers of the Civir. Centor, IowtM az 10500 Civic Centu Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The mceting was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout Present wem Councilmembers: William J. Alezandeq Charles 1. Buquet II, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jerry Fulwood, Acting City Manager; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Atmmey; Rick Gomez, Community Development Direcmr, Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; Tarty Smith. Park Planning/Development Superintendent: Bmd Buller, City Planner, Otto Kroudl, Deputy City Planner, Scott Murphy, Associate Planner; Jp; OTJeiI, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy Cily Engineer, Mikc Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer; Belly Miller, Associate Engineer, Duane Baker, Assisunt m the City Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyse II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst i; Chic( Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fme Protection Disvict; and Jan Su«on, Deputy Cily Clerk. Ahsent was Councilmember: Pamela 1. Wright .....~ No announcements nr pmsenmtions were made. +r~r~. r, t'OMMIINI('a TIDNC FRDM TuR ono•rr No communications were made fmm the public. 1 ~~~R• DI. Approval of Mln«Iefi: July I5, 1992 D2, Approval of Warrants, Rcgislcr Nos. 7(29N2 (FY 91ry2), 7/29/92 (FY 92/93), 8/SN2 (FY 91/92), and R/SN2 (FY 92ry3): and Payroll ending 7/30N2 (or the toW amount of 51,493,911(1,23. D3. Appmval to receive and (ile currant Investment Schrdule as oUuly 31, 1992. Ciry Council Minutes August ! 9, 1992 Page 2 D4. Approval [o reject all bids as non-responsive and authorize the re-advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" tm dre Haven Avenue Rehabilimtion and Widening from Fourth Succt tU Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from Systems Fund, Account No. 22-0637-8936 and Federal Aid Urban (F.A.UJ Fund, Account Number M-4637-8838. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA. RESOLUTION N0.92-230 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECffICAT1ONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING, FicOM FOURTIi S'1REET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD", IN SAID CFfY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING 77-1E CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEfYE BIDS D5. Approval to Change the Day and Time of the Regular Historic Preservation Commission Mcetings. RESOLUTION N0.92-224 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE DAY AND TIME FOR THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF 71~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION D6. Approval to Designate City Represenutive and Alternate Represenmtive (or the California Municipal buumr¢c Authodty (CMIA) Board of Direcmrs. RESOLUTION NO. 92-225 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A REPRESENTATIVF. AND ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS D7. Approval m adopt Annual Statement of Investment Folicy. DR. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the defeasance of cermin obligations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 92-057) with a portion of the proceeds from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's 1990 Taz Allocation Bonds. RESOLUTION N0.92-226 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TfiE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE DEFEASANCE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO CALIFORNIA CI77E5 FINANCING CORPORATION'S 56,390,000.00 CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 19RR SERIES 8 WITH A PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S 1990 TAX ALLOCA77ON BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN ESCROW AGREEMENT AND OTHER MATTERS PERTABYING THERETO D9, Approval to execute an agreement (CO 92.OSR) for HVAC service fm the Civic Center and Public Safety Facility with Robemshaw, Incorporated for FY I992ry3 in the amount of $22,130.00 m be funded fmm Account No. OI-0245-602R. City Council Minutes August 19, 1992 Page 3 DIO. Approval m authorize the Mayer to execute the Proposal (CO 92-059) from Terry Wolfe of Terry's Fveplace m purchase bulk wastewood from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. DI t. Approval to award and authorization to execute convect (CO 92-060) for the constructlon of Tra(Gc Signals and Safety Lighting at Vineyard Avenue at Arrow Route, to Macadee Electrical Conswction for the amount of $72,208.00 ($65,644.00 plus 10% c contingency), to be funded from TDA Article 8 Fund Account No. 1?-4637- 9I02. Dig. Approval to execute Contract Change Pder ho. 3 (CO 89-OCI) to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quaid and Douglaz, Incorporated for Design Changes and Additioral Designs, Interstate 16 and Foothill BoWevard Interchange Modification, Account No. 16.50300. D13. Approval to execute agreements for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Easements near Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, for the following properties, L.S.H., Masi, SouNem California Ediwn and Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 92.227 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DEDICA770N OF EASEMENTS FROM LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, L.S.H. DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, MAST COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON COMPANY D14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12332.2, located on the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and Tackstem Place, submitted by MJ. Brock. RESOLUTION N0.92-228 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12332-2 MOTION: Moved by Williams, saonded by Alexander to approvo the Consent Calendar, Icss Item Nos. D4 and D10. Motion canird unanimously,4-0-1 (Wright absent). .+~~~~ DISCUSSION OF ITEM DIO, Approval to author(ze the Mayor to execute the Proposal (CO 92-059) from Terry Wolfe of 'Ferry's Fireplace to purchase bulk wastewood from the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga. Couucilmember Williams asked if now that this idea has been brought up, should Ne City consider going Through a hid process. or jest go with this proposal without geeing bids from other vendors loc O'Neil, City Engineer, stated staff chaked with dw Chy Attorney's office and were advised that it would be legal m accept this proposal, but they coulJ go lhmugh a Request for Proposal process if the Council dosittd. Cnuncilmem6cr W illiams smted shejust wanted to make sum they were following the proper procedure. City Council Minutes August ]9, 1992 Page 4 Mayor Smut stated he had the same thoughts as Councilmember Williams but knew how expensive it would be m have this go through a formal bid proms. He stated shin proposal represented a 520,11(10.00 savings for the City, and if they went out to bid, would arrolher mntracmr pay more than that m offset staff time and costs assxiated with the bid process. Ha felt They could approve mis nn a trial basis, and iF at some time it scerned attractive m other vendors, they could consider doing a Request for Proptual Nen. Ioe O7Veil, City Engineer, stated ~E vendor required the City m deliver die wood m his site, but he was lomted in Rancho Cucamonga so that waz not a problem. He added if They contracted with a vendor who was kxased oaLSide of dse City and had the same requirement. it would cost the City additional funds for transportation. Mayor Smut Nought maybe they could try it for now and see if them were any other interessed vendors after a yes. Councilmember Buquet stated as long az this was a legal process, he would comer see Lhe wood recycled than being taken m the dmnp. He asked if the property where the wood was m be taken was zoned for this type of use. Joc OTlcil, City Engincer, stated he did not know the answer m that antl would have m look inm it. Councilmember Alexander Celt they should postpone this item wtil They could check the zoning sequirunents. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander so continue (his item m the Sepmanber 2, 1992 meeting. Motion cartied 4-0-1 (Wri¢hs ah~rns? a~rrr• E. CONSENT ORDINANCES EL CONSIDERATION OF EYVIRONMENTAI ASSECSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DI~TR CT AMENDMENT 89-07 -SOUTHWEST DESIGN GROUP - A request m amend the Development Districte Map lrom Low-Medium Residential (4-R dwelling units per acre) m Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling uniss per acre) for five acres of land located tin dte north side of Base Line Road, west of Alta Cssesu Drive - APN: 202-025-01, 04, 07, Og, 12, 13, and 14. Related Files: Tentative Tract 14208 and Tree ftcmoval Parmit 91-00. Jan Sutmn, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Odinance No. 499 ORDINANCE N0.499 (.smond reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 89-07, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM "LM" (LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO "M" (MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, 8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR FIVE ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON TFIE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WFST OF ALTA Cl1ESTA DRIVE - APN: 2M-02S-0L 04, b7, O8, 12, 13, AND 14, .4ND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by 8ugmt m waive full reading and appmve Ordinance No. 499. Motion carried unanimously,4-0-I (Wright absent). •~«~r• City Council Minutes August 15, 1992 Page 5 E2. CONSIDERATION TO AMFND CHAFfFR 3 OS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNIC@AL OD TOA OW ~OMPFTIT3VF NEGOTIATION Ian Sutmn, Deputy City Clerk, read the fide o(OMinance No. 500. ORDINANCE NO. 500 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THG CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNA, AMENDING SECTION 3.08.050 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUN[C1PAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECITON 3.08.090 CF7 PERTABVING TO PURCHASES BY COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION `dOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by euquet m waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 500, Motion camicd unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absenQ. ....ra E3. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPI AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE cFL•F10N IQ52 020 QJr$TAINMG TO LIMPED TIME PARKING ZONES 70 PROVIDE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF SIGNS TO D N -~ AS N OPTION TO PAINTIN . (7 meS tan Sutbn. Deputy City Clerk, mad the title of Ordinance No. 39-D. ORDINANCE N0.39-D (secorM reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.52.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING LIMITED TTME PARKING ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Buquet m waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 39-D. Motion rarticd unanimously, 4A-1 (W right absenQ. r e.~r. Items G1 and HI were discussed at this lime, but the minutes will remain in agenda order, r~.r+w FI. CONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITION_ Ate. [tC_E PFRMIT 85-04 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/FTIWANUA IHCTORICAL SOCIETY - A regtwst to constnrcl a 2.500 square foot bam nn the Chaffey-Garcia site to be used as a museum and caretaker's residence on a 1-acm site in the Low-Medium Rasidential designation (6-A dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, lorated on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, nosh of Base Line Road - APN: 22~-513-05. Stall ropoM1 presented by Scod Murphy, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout npcnctl the meeting for public hearing, Addressing the Council was: City Council Minutes August 19, 1992 Page 6 Scoa Murphy, Associate Planner, speaking on behalf of Mr. )im Clark of the Etiwanda Historical Society, who could not be present tonight, wanted to relay Mr Clark's support of the project. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION N0.42-229 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRGVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. SS-04, TO CONSTRUCT A 2,500 SQUARE FOOT EARN ON THE CHAFFEY-GARCIA SITE TO BE USED AS A MUSEUM AND CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE ON A 1-ACRE PARCEL IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-6 DWELLING L'NITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT' OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE 1VEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF RASE L.iNE ROAD •APN: 227-513-05 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by 6uquet [o adopt Resolution No. 92-229. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0- 1 (Wright abscnU. •~. ~.• F2. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERM-IT 91-24 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13845 - MAST - An appeal of certain engineering and Planning Division Conditions of approval far Conditional Use Permit 91-24, the development of 32 buildings totaling approximately 268.907 square (eel and comprised of a miz of industrial, multi-tenant, office and restaurant uses, and Tentative Parcel Map 13845, a subdivision of 30.2 acres of land into 31 parcels in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN: 229-0I1-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28. Sniff report presented by Otm Kmutil, Deputy City Planner, and Betty Miller, Associate Engineer. Mayor Stout sorted he was under the impression that the reason staff reviews signs for pmjccts other than shopping centers was because the Planning Commission had delegated tha authority w staff, but frlt the appellant assumed the opposite was the case. Otto Kmutil, Deputy City Planning, staled the Planning Commission has the authority to review all the sign programs, but they have delegated the authority to sniff on projects aha than shopping centers. Councilmcmber Alexander asked if smif wero to review sign programs, could the Planning Commission not selectively pull a project out for review if they did not agree with staffs decision. Mayor Stout stated he thought the Planning Commission has already made Ne decision that they want to review all of it flar this project Otm Kroulil, Deputy City Planner, sorted the Commission usually would not sec things handled at sta(( level unless a special mqunst wns made to put it on an agenda. Mayor Stout slated it was his impression the developer wanted to install the va(Flc signal on Foothill at the time of UID development, so why would Ihcy have to pay nit in-lieu ice. Baty rdiller, Associate Enginwr, stated if the developer received permission from Calvans to install the signal, the City would not mquirc an in-lieu fcc. City Courcii Minutes Auguu 19,1992 Page 7 Mayor Stout sorted then the requirement was a contingency in case they did not receive permission m instill the srgnal. He azked if Caluans would have any reason m deny the instailadon of the signal. Jce O'Neil, City Engineeq sorted staff was not sure because they did not think that area would meet Calvans' warrants, so he thought there might be some resistance b it. He (elt Calwns would allow the median cut if the median was built, but would resist the signal m this time. Mayor Stout thought they had a policy chat all median cuts had ro be signalvxd. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated that because there waz not a north leg yet, it would not be as critical a factor for Caluans. Couxiimember Buquet felt (here would not be a problem with Calvans since the developer was pushing to have the median cut and would be providing Ne signal. Hu thought that they would allow the signal. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council were John Mannerino. 9333 Base Line. Road #1I0, representing the Masi family, felt there were six issues to be addressed. He sated that in regards to the consultant, he stated it was Commissioner Melcher's suggestion that a consultant be hired. He slated that it was clear that his concerns were not on issues such as the durability of the material, but directed specifically m an artistic consultant being hired m offer advice as to the artistic comm~t of Ne suwtes. He felt in today's ewrtomy consideration had m 6e given w conserve funds where able, and the developer felt City staft was capable of generating artwork guideline wiNout having to him anoNer consultant He stated in regards to the sign issue, he staled it waz staffs initial recommenda0on to the Planning Commission that the sign program be approvcA 6y staff but the Planning Commission indicated that they wanteA to review it. He felt that since this was not a retail center but a mizcd-use center, then soft should be alimved to mvicw the sign program az per normal policy. He felt it would be handled in a more timely manner and that staff was capable o(mvicwing the sign program. He stated in regard m the Vintner's Walk improvements, they had a concern about vandalism if it was installed prior to the conswcdon of the buildings, and That when work began on Phase Two, a large portion of the improvements would be destroyed and have to be done over. He felt the MasYS were well known in the community and could be cormted on to complete the improvements as required after construction was complGCd, Iohn Mannerino slated they were sadstled with salts recommendation nn the drainage issue. He continued wish listing the developer's concerns in regards to the in-lieu fee for the traffic signal since this signal is not required by the City and does not appear in the Master Pian Cor the area. He stated the developer has volunmrily offered to install the signal, and that this signal will benefit the public at large and not just users of their project FIc satM if the Council requires the fee, he asked that the Cily might integrate the light torn the Master Plan so that Ihey would get crWit w their irdnsponation Ccex. Totld Bremner, 10313 Trademark Street #A, Project Engineer (or the Masts, spoke in regards to the median on Foothill Boulevard. He rcfcrted to plans Lewis Homes had Madole and Associalce prepare that showed e siz inch difference in the grade which is a signi(irant difference from the planned median in their project. 1{c understood that Lewis Homes has postponed (heir plans for conswcting that portion of the'v businoss park which would require median eonswetlon, and felt they should wait until the entire median was ready to be construded so (heir portion did not have to be dug up end redone in order to meet the grade difference in the Lewis sution, He stated they have both engincering and economic wncems that it they condnue with their plans and build the median, it will be inconsismnt with the remaining portion of median m be consvucted by Lewis Homes. He sorted they would like to request an option to pixe an in-lieu tee for Ne e~nswetion oRhe median, City Council Minutes August 19, 1992 Page 8 Councilmember Buquet asked if the City were m approve postponing the construction of the mWian, would the developer be willing to black that driveway access into the project and only allow access from B Sueet a Rochester. He felt it was important becanx if the median was not there, you would have conFlicting vaffic pa[tems far the intersection and the businece comer which could cause accidents. Todd Dremner stated he was not of a position m give an immediate answs m that quesdon, but pointed out that this portion of the project waz in Phase Two. He felt there may be dher means to control people fmm coming left across traffic into the censer and it might be possible to put something up m restrict trccess. John Mannerinn stated he has consulted with Mr. Masi and he would be willing m install Ne median when they insmll that panicular driveway, and would be willing to work with statf in order to postpone construction until Phase Two. He also wanted m clarify that in regards to conswcdon of the Vintners Walk, their inten[ was ro put m the sidewalk and access tacilifies for the public, and that Neir request was to delay installarion of Uc wllis and artwork until conswcdon was near completion. He sated the hfasfs have always felt this was apublic/privme project. and mey have voluntarily planned improvements above and beyond the normal required items, and asked that the City be aware of the current economic state. There being no further comments, the public hcadng waz closed. Councilmember Buquet asked what waz the timeline for completing Phase One and Phase Two, Brad Bcllcr. City Planner, stated that at the Planning Commission mce6ng the applicant indicated Phase Two would follow within throe months of Phase One. Mr. Masi stated they anticipated staning eonswetion of Phase One in January of 1993 with compleion xhcduled for June or July. He stated Phase Two was xhWulcd to begin in April of 1993, with ^.ompletion anticipated six months later. Councilmemher Duquet askai for clarification on the commem made abort the tragic signal not being required by the Cuy. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, sated the signal would have been required if the 4eveloper had not volunteered m have nnc installed. Mayor Stout states he would like to go over tech of the items under the Analysis scefion of the staff report and cane to a dclermination. He sated in regards m Item 1 of the Analysis, Final Approval of the "Vintner's Walk," he did not know what it was the consul6vn was supposed to do. He asked what kind ofconsultant Jid the Commission have in mind. Brad Buller, City Planner, stales the consulmm would act in an advisory capxity, having ezpertix in the setting up of displays of both nn and history and coordinating with all invelvrd in the project to make sure all the different components were harmonious. Councilmember Alenander asked i(there was anyone on staff that would 6e qualified to do that. Brad Bullu, City Planner, stated staf(Aid a similar futrctlon with the Thomas Winery project, working closely wish the Planning and Flistmic Reservation Commissions, Mayor Stout stated whatever concept the applicant came up with ultimately had b be approved by the City, so he felt they should submit the finalired conceptual plans, and if it was not accepmble and they felt they needed a consultant b help them, they could hire one at that time. City Council Minutes August 19, 1992 Page 9 Councilmember Alexander felt they did not need a consulmnt He felt staff and the Commissions would be able m work with the applicant on the design, Cowcilmember Bugnet tell they should do what has been done in the past and let the developer make a presentation before saying they have [c have a consultant. John Mannerino smmd the Council passed a resolution stating the Hismde Presrnation Commission was m approve the proposed statues, that the concept and general pixement o: the statues has been approved, but the Commission would approve the aesthetic nature of the stames. Mayor Stout sated his intention when they passed that resolution was that the Historic Preservation Commission should review it m insure it was consismnt with the goals of preservation within the commtmity, but no[ necessarily the xsthedcs of the artwork itself. He stated the concept on how it would fit into the public improvements and design of the center itscl(should be decided by the Planning Commission. The Council contorted they should not regove me appellant to hire a consultant, and that the Planning Commission should make the final decision wim comments from the Historic Praservation Comments. The Council Then discussed the De(ertal of "Vinmer's Walk" Installation. Mayor Stout stated he understood the applicant's point of view, but has seen improvements like this and the resistance m installing them when too much other conswction is allowed. He felt that since the phasing was going m be so ek>se together a substantial portion could be dorce during Phase One m the point where it would nut overburden the rest of the project if it was not done. He felt it was strictly a protection fm the City, and did not feel it would brut the appellant since their phasing was schcdtiled m occur so close together. Councilmember Buquct agreed that Ne Cily has been homed many times before in the past, and felt them should be a way to put some type of phasing mgether on this project for the improvemenks. He felt things Tike the landscaping and curbs and sidewalks needed to go in rieht away, but things Tike the trellis could be delayed ands conawction stoned on Phase Two. Brad Buller, City Planner, clarified if Council's inswction was m defer the construction of the Vintne%s Walk and accompanying anwork m Phase Twn if permits for Phase Two and substantial cunswetion o(Phase Two has begun before rrgxst of occupancy of Phase One, because if there was an overlap, they crwld not mquest occupancy of Phase One until the Vintner's Walk was under consWCtion. Council contorted that would be a reasonable request. Mayor Smut then moved m Item No. 3, the Chaffcy-Garcia Bam Contribution. He staled they had already reduced this amount to 510,000.(10 from the original amount oL525,IXq.00, and the project was just approved tonight m go out to bid. He stated the intention o(Ute Council when the reduction was made was to allow the developer to put the SI5,0f10.00 difference into their project, vt he felt their request was already granted when Council reviewed it previously. Mayor Stout stated that in regards to Item No. 4, Approval of Uniform Sign Program, he did nM see why the Planning Commission could not mview it since they wort the ones who delegated sm(f review in Ne fast plxe. Councilmember Buyuct slated he did not undersmnd what would be the difference 6etwecn staff review or Commission review, since smf(normally reviews signs except for mmil shopping cenNrs. Mayor Stout Felt wish some of the changes that have been approved in the pmjwt, it was smiting m resemble a retail censer, plus it was Incased nn Fonmill in a very high profile area. City Council Minutet August 19, 1992 Page 10 Cnuncilmember Buquet agreed, but felt that staff would be sensitive to the signage issue since they deal with it on a regular basis. He stated he would be comfortable with smf( reviewing it first, and then the Planning Commission wuld review it if they were not happy with staff's decisions. Councilmember Williams asked if the signs had already been reviewed during the Design Review process, Brad Bullar, City Planner, stated in Design Review they just present illusuadons showing whero signs would be located, but they are no[ detailed drawings. Counciimembcr W illiams stated she woWd be confident in staff conducting the review of the sign program. Councilmember Buquet asked for clarification of the difference between a staff review and Planning Commission review of a sign pmgrmn. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff usually handles sign reviews over the counter once a program has been established, but in this instance the Commission has found it is important to see the overall sign program. He staled it was bated nn a center by center basis as to what Ne differences would be. Councilmen~ber Alexander stated he also felt staff uwld hande the sign review. Council contorted to allow staff m handle the sign review. Mayor Swut tMn referred to Item No. 5, Foothill Boulevard Median and Nosh Sidc Pavement Construction. He felt the median should be installed and d:e center should not be allowed m oFen unless there was a median. Councilmember Buquet stated a comment had been made shout median installation m the east of the project, and sorted even in These h:ud economic times the City was facing their responsibility and installing the melon for safety reasons, and felt the developer should instill the median at This time and have a reimbursement agreement set up so they could be reimbursed whe.^. the north side of Foothill was developed. He felt there would be a Ins of traffic con0icts if they did ran install the median m control traffic, Mayor Stout stated the Cily spent approximately 5800,000.00 to improve dre inlersccdon ae Foothill and Rochesteq which normally this project would have paid for if it had developed prior to the City finding it necessary to improve the intersection for safety reasons. He sorted the City was also improving Rochester to benefit the sports complex, but it will also benefit this project, so he felt the City has assisted this project monetarily. He stated the need for the median was a safety issue, not one of awlhetics. Councilmember Alexander asked i( the median would have m be changed when the noM side of the street was developed by Icwis since their plans were so different. toe O'Neil, City EngirK:cr, sutcd he did not drink that would happen becwse the plans drat Lewis had Aladole draw up arc not approved plans, so they would be myuired m march their plans to the ones submiaed for this project. Councilmemher Buquet sorted if the Council allowed them to postpone cnnswcuon of the median, he would strongly recommend they do not allow access into Phase Two from Foodtill Boulevard. M11aynr Stout stated that in regards to Item No. 6, the Interim Drainage Improvements, he understood that when Lewis wmplemd their project nn the north side of Fwthill, the old pipe would be unnecessary anyway. lue O'Neil, City Enginceq anted that was correct City Council Minutes August 19, 1992 Pagel l Counciimember Buquet asked far clarification about the mainlerlartce, who would be responsible for maintaining it Jce O'Neil, City Engineer, sated it would be the City's responsibility w maintain He smted the condition was in there for the developer to do IGe original work in repairing and cleaning out the old line to a mainminable corldidon, and then the City would maintain it unfit the new facilities were built. The Council concurred to accept sraffs tecommendauon on Ibis point. The Council then discussed I(em No. 7, Deletlon of Traffic Signal "In-Lieu" Fees. Councilmembcr Buquet stated he felt it was just a misunderstanding, Wat the developer thought they were offering something above and beyond wlmt the City required, but the City would have required that intersection to be signalized as a condidon o(thc project. Mayor Stout asked fw cLuiEcation on the inquest for reimbursement. Jx O'Neil, City Engineer, stalrA the question oI reimbursement had m do with the fact That this signal was not in the transponaden fee program, because the systems fee was set up to include signals That have a community benefit. He stated thu signal would be strictly for the benefit of the adjacem property owners. He stated dre systems fee was carefully sCl up to conform to the legal guidelines that are required for a system fee of dtis type. He stated the BIA was involved with the developmem of this fcc, and the City has followed the legal guidelines, and he (ell that inclusion of signals like this would taint Ne process. Mayor Stout asked if it was a requiremem of the project, can they require a signal without it being a part of the City- wide system without having m pay a reimbursement. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer, smted yes. He stated if Caluans did not allow Them Io insmll it at This dine, staff is rccommcnding that the developer put up an in-lieu fce for their haiPof the signal. Mayor Stout felt i(the developer was allowed to install the signal, it was a moot point, but d They cannot, then maybe the City can defer the in-lieu fee and nigger it by some other method than issuance of building permits for ^ha;c OIN. A".gybe •.eher. ;hey apply (or occupancy rar Phase One. Councilmember Buquet felt the xcupancy of Phase One would be the best approach. He stated they could try tv work with Caluans to get approval (or the signal. Councilmember Alexander asked if they could defer the fee untll they were wady (or occupancy for Phase Two, since that would be when they have the most ua(fic. Mayor Smm felt it would be a problem if they were m sIan de(cring too many Things into Phase Two, if something were to happen that they would not be able to complete the whole project, it would be less likely that they would install the signal. He smmd if they did not collect the fee and that area was found to be a safety hazard, the City would be liable for paying for dle signal with no contribution from the developer, /oho Mannerino staled Mr. Masi would like to propose a compromise in that the incident That would nigger the inslallafion of the Vintner's Walk and the payment of the in-lieu fee be when they ask for the occupancy permit o(Ihe last building of Phase One. Mayor Sbul stated he coulA see a problem with That in That the lease for one o(the pods might fall through and the final development would not be completed for a Inng time, and that Phase Two might be completed befom the final pad o(Phase One was complete, City Council Minuas August 19, 1992 Page 12 Councilmembcr Buquet felt duty should do everything they can to assist with geeing die approval from Caltrans for the installation of the signal, and don the fall back position would be that if they cannot gel approval, Then they would take an in-lieu fee, Rick Gomez, Community Development Dimcar, suggested Ney could take the in-lieu tee prior to da releau of the fast occupancy of Phase One. The Council coxurted with Rick Gomez's suggestion The Mayor asked staff to return wish a resolution covering aII the decisions made tonight, that they could rat take final action at this meeting. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Atmmey, stated due since it was an appeal, they would need findings for Rase matters which they have not changed, and would recommend the Council direct staff a bring a tcsolubon back on the Conant CakrMar incorpomdng all of the changes made relight. Councilmembra• Buquet sated he waz unhappy dot they spent so much dme ar Nis meeting discussing this item and Nen were unable m take final action. He felt staff should have preunred appropriate resolutions and options Nat Hey could have modified i(necesxary, aM had it over wiN. MOTION: MovGl by Alexander, seconded by Williams a bring back a resolution with rite modifications on dK Consent Calendar at Ne September 2, 1992 mcedng. Motion cartied 4-0-I (Wright abunt). aaara• O. PIIBLIC NF.ARiNpS Gl. CONSIRERATION OF AN ORDINAN .. cTAB ICHIN • R rLATtONS AND P RMIT RF~O~tIREM NF 7~~FOR TAXICAB SERVICE (Continued from August 5, 1992) Mayor Stout smted Nere was a request to continue Nis item since the information requcstetl at the August 5th mwting wet still being compileO and suggested they continue Nis item to Ne tazt meeting. Maya Stout re-opened Nc public hearing for Ne purpou of continuing Ifem GI m die September 2, 1992 meeting ORDINANCE NO.501 (lust reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TtTLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.30 ENTITLED "TAXICAB SERVICE," THEREIN REGULATING AND PERMITTING THE OPERATION OF TAXIS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to continue Item Gl to the September 2, 1992 mcedng. Motion carded unanimously, 4-0-I (Wright absenq. •~~aaa City Council Minutes August 19, 1992 Page 13 H. CITV MANAC.F.R'S STAFF REPORTg H1. DISCUSSION ON ALTERNATIVES TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS Mayor Stout stated this item was requested 6y Counciltnember Wright, and suggested it be continued as she could not be present this evening due m medical reasons. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Williams m continue Item Hl to the September 2, 1992 meeting. hfodon carrieA unanimously, d-0-1 (Wdght absenQ. liii!• No items were submitmd. i i!!!! No items wem idendOCd. ltiVlM K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF. PUBLIC Nn communications wem made from the public. !i!!!i MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to adjourn to Executive Session ro discuss pending liugalion, Wood v. City of Rancho Cucamonga. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-I (Wright abcent). The meeting adjoumul al 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submided, Ian Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: September 2, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CI:CAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A regular meeaing of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, September 2, 1992, in the Council Chambers o(me Civic Cenmq located at IOSW Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meehng was called m order at 8:38 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stour Present were Councilmemhrs: William 1. Alexander, Charles ]. Buquet II, Diane Williams (arrived 8:45 p.m.), Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis G Smut Also prcscnt were: lack Lam, City Manager; lames Martarean, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Terry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Mannger; Rick Gomez, Community Devebpment Ditccmr, Olrn Dories, Sr. RDA Analyse; tan Reynolds, Asst. RDA Analyst; Tarty Smith, Park Pianning/Development Sttperinlendent; Bmd Buller, City Planner, Larry Henderson, 3'rincipal Planna', Nancy Fong, Sr. Planrrer; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner, Ice O'Neil, City Engirtecr; Cimly Hackett, Associam Fngineer, Walt Stickney, Assceiam Enginwr, Barbara Kroll, Assisunt Engineer, Terry Grant, Building Official; Duane Bakeq Assiswm to the City Manager; biane O'Neil, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DisnicG Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Ikpuunent; and Debm 7. Adams, City Clerk. «~.... Bl. Presentation m Fire Captain George W. Cox Recognizing his Retirement after 20 years of Dedicated Service m the People of Rancho Cucamonga Proclamation presented by Mayor Smut to George Coz. B2. Presenmtion to the Alm Loma Arsenal Soccer Club for winning Ure National C,up Championship of the United Smtcs Yomh Soccer Asssiation. Mayor Smut presented the prcelamation to Pete Gundv and Betty Williams, and recognized the achievement of the soccer clubby asking the audicnm m stand and applaud Ihcm. Pete Gundy conbnucd by introducing the players of me soccer club. City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 2 B3. Presentadon of Proclamations m Steve Wilkerson (Pop Warcer), left Duval (Summit Grading and Pavmg), Ram Alarcon (Alarcon Sons, inc.), and Paul Wiley (C.E. Wiley Conswetlon) for Community Effort m Create a Dirt Parking Lot at Cha(fey Colbge. Mayor Stout presented the praclamadons m all those in attendance except Paul Wiley and Eric Myers. awnr~a CounciMember Williams arrived at R:46 p.m. •~s..• •r•~.. C t. Gary Kendrick commented on the negative comments he has heard trom City officials regarding the Wise Oak Schonl. He felt the Alu Loma School District is also non-compliant and the City has not done anything about their situation. He hoped the Planning Canmission would Wlow them m open them school when it comes before them, C2. Formst Hindley, Prstor of R'illows Community Church, asked the City Council to enwtuagc tha Planning Commission w work with them so Ne Wise Oat: School coWd open. C3. Miilie Glenncy, 6580 Euwanda, stated they are having a rteighhorlrood picnic in the Windrows area on Sutalay, 9/13/92, and asked if the fce fa the sowW monitor cmdd be waived. Mayor Smut stated the Council could not act on this item mnight beausc it was not on the egeMa as required by smm law, but asked drat this bo plated on the nest agenda for the Courrcil m consider. .~~rrf lack lam. City Manager, stated for reconl keeping purposes, Resolution No. 92-230 should be changed m Resolution No. 92-241. Mr, Mike ScarWifio asked that Item No. D4 be mmoved (or discussion, Dl. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/12x92 end 8/19N2; and Payroll ending 8/13/92 for Ore total amount of 54,002,767.91. D2. Approval m Adnpt a Resolution in Support of Proposition I56 -The Rail Bnnd Measure. RESOLOTION NO, 92339241 A RESOI-UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN RUPPORT OF PROPDSITION 156 U3. Approval of Rtreel Banner Applications. City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 3 D4. Approval of an Appeal of Conditional Use Permit 91-24 and Tentative Parcel Map 13845 -Masi - An appeal of certain Engineering and Planning Division Conditions of Approval for Conditiorml Use Permit 91-24, dte development of 32 buildings totaling approximately 268,907 square feet and comprised of a mix of industrial, malti- tenant, office, and restaurant uses, and Tentative Parcel Map 13845, a subdivision of 30.2 acres of land into 31 parcels int he Industrial Park Disuict (Subarea 7) of the industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN: 229-Oil-10, 19, 2l, 26, 27, and 28. (ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MR. MIKE SCANDIFIO) RESOLUTION N0.92-231 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITTONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13645, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ANU ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FIND]NGS hN SUPPOR'! T7iEREOF -APN: 229-0I 1-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, AND 28 RESOLUTION N0.92-240 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.91- 24 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 32 BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 268,907 SQUARE FEET AND COMPRISED OF A MIX OF INDUSTRIAL, MULTI- TENANT, OFFlCE, AND RESTAURANT USES [N THE INDUSTRTAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229.011-10, 19. 21, 26, 27, AND 28 D5. Approval to Award and Authorize Ezxution of Contract (CO 92-061) for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Protect, from Fourth Sueet to Foothill Doulevard far the Amount of 5866,872.36 (5788,065.78 plus 1096 contingency), to be funded from Systems Development Fund, Aceount No. 22-0637~89?6 and FAU Fund, Account No. 24~t637-flfl3R. D6. Appmval to execute Consuuction Cooperative Agreemem Number B-787 (CO 92-062) with Calvans for the Improvement of Nineteenth Stmcl from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Strcct. RESOLUTION N0.92-232 A RF.SOLUT!ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONSTRUCTTON COOVERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. R-787 WITH TFIF. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POR THE IMPROVEMENT OF NINL•TEENTH STREET FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO AMETHYST STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING THEREOF BY'I'HE MAYOR D7. Approval to authorize the Mayor to execute the Proposal (CO 92-059) from Terry Wolfe of Terry's Fireplace In purchase Uulk wastewood from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (Continued from Augosl I9, 1992) Dfl. Approval to execute Improvement Agrcement Extension for Tract 13565-1 lhru -4, located on the norlMast coma of Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by StandaM Pacific. City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 4 RESOLUTION N0.92.234 A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13565-1 THROUGH ll9. Approval m accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Nmice of Completion for the West Gmznway Trail extending on from West Greenway Park m Elm Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond S 137,000.00 RESOLUTION N0.92-235 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhtONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WEST GREENWAY TRAIL AND AUTHORIZING 7HE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by W iiliams m approve du Consent Caletxiar wiN the exception of Item No. D4. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. rrrrrr DISCUSSION OF ITF,M NO. Dd. Approval of ao Appeal of Conditional Use Permit 9t-24 and Tentative Parcel Map 13845 -Masi An appeal of certain Engineering and Pianoing Division Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 91.24, lbe development of 32 buildings totaling approximately 268,907 square feet and comprised of a mix of industrial, mulli4enant, office, and restaurant uses, and Tentative Parcel Map 13845, a subdivision of 30.2 acres of land into 31 parcels int he Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located al the southweat corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-OII-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28. Mr. Scandifio stated there was one point in the Resolution and as mentioned in Ne amH report, it waa then undersmnding that the sign program was to be reviewed by suD and fah tiv,t part of their appeal had bem granted. He also mentioned Utat next week the Cowgirl would becoming down. Mayor Stout agreed with Mr. Scandifio's observation with regard b Then appeal. Councilmember Alexander stated he also felt Mr. ScarMifto was ccareet. Cou~ilmember Buquet staled he Imd nn preference either way. Brad Huller, City Planneq slated this is worded as Condition H on page 24DU and stated the wording wind be changed so that it stales: "final approval o(this uniform sign program is appropriate with staff or shall be subject m stall mvicw anA approval". Cily Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 5 RESOLUT.ON NO. 92-231 A RESOLUTION OF TI3E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13845, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKWG FiNDWGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, AND 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92-240 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIDi C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV WG CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.91- 24 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 32 DUILDWGS TOTALWG APPROXIMATELY 268,9(17 SQUARE FEET AND COMPRISED OF A MIX OF WDUSTRIAL, MULTI- TENANT, OFFICE, AND RESTAURANT USES IN THE WDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKWC FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TFIliREOF - APN: 229-O11-10, 19, 21. 2b. 27-,AND 28 MOTION: Moved by Alexandv, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos, 92-231 and 92-2A 1 as corrected. Motion carrird unanimously, 4-0~0-1 (Wright abstained due m being absent at the last meeting this was discussed), ...»~• No items were submitmd. .~~~.• Fl, UONSIDERATION OF AN APP AI T VARIANCE 92 02 Sn vA . An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the request to reduce the required inferior side yard setback from 5 feet m 6 inches from the property line for a single family home in the Low Residential District (2.4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10077 Ironwood Sneer -APN: 1077-041 b4. Staf(repon presenrrd by Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner. Mayor Stout operrcd Ne mceting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Mr. and Mrs, Silva, 10077 Ironwood, presented their viewpoint of the chronology of events and why they should be granted the variance to grant their appeal. They sated their neighbors do not object to them receiving the variance. Cmmcilmcmher Alexander smted he did not want m set a pmcedent by approving this. Ran Nichols, 10092 Ironwoal, neighbor of the Silva's, stated he has no problem with allowing the variance, He smted his wde also had tw problem with allowing this. Them being no further response, Ne public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 6 Councilmember Wright stated aceording m Ne chmnology, the homwwntts were allowed m cominue wiN the project for twenty months before someone told Nem it was rat being done xcording N standards. She did not Nink it was fight a make Nem go back and change things after Ne City had once ald them it was okay. Councilmemher Wiilimns stated she had gone m Ne site and looked at Ne situation. She stated she agreed wiN Couxilmcmber Wright's commenLS. She also mentioned she noticed fire same situation at a neighbor's housa. She did not Nink Nis would set a precedent. Cancilrnember A~zander questioned i(Nis could be approved without setting a prewdenl, although he did no[ Nink Nis would set a precedent. He felt the Silva's were the victim and should rat be punished Councilmember Buquet Ceit Ne Planning Commisson was corrwt in Neir action. He felt Nis lot was a peculiar shapC. Mayor Star stated he agreed wiN what waz stated previously. He slated what wnr:erns him is Nat there is no record of the original approval. He felt Nis was an administrative eror and did not want Nis to set a precedent and should ba made pan of the recortl Nat it is no[ setting precedent. RESOLUTON N0.92-236 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORMA, DENYING THE APPEAL. AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECiStON TO DENY VARIANCE NO. 92-0'1, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 6 INCHES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY- HOME IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PF'R ACRE), LOCATED AT 10077 IRONWOOD STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS [N SUPPORT THEREOF - APN; 1077-041-61 MOTION: Moved by Saut, seconded by Alezander a grant Ne appeal and a allow Ure variarae wiN certain conditions. The conditions of Ne variance being Nat fire mitigation measures az proposed by Nc City staff and as discussed earlier be wnstnrcled, that is dm fire wall and Ne exlosrue in fire Frent, that it specifically state in the variance not only Ne unusual bcation of Ne poles, but Ne administrative error, so it is made Ckar Nis is not a precedent anA Nat Ne City be more sensitive to Ncse types of situations where (here is a ditferrnce between what the Planning setbxk allows and what Nc Building Inspecmrs am doing out in Ne ficW. He felt Arey should be a IiWe more sensitive m Nis. Councilmembcr Alezander asked Mr. Markman i(it would be beuer to go forward wiN Ne motion stated above or deny Ne variance, upholding the Planning Commission xtion and allow some other form of action to occur He stated he was mentioning Nis because of the precedent seltlng. James Markman, City Altomey, stalyd they should act on Ne variance wiN direction to prepare a Resolution N bring hxk to Nc Conncil. He felt it should stale Nat Ne purpose the Silva's want to use Ne sideyard is made difficult because of the utility facility, He stated there would probably not be many ezamples of Nis type of situation in Nc City. Mayor Stout sateA he wtmted Ne administrative error finding a be included in the Resolution. Motion cartied unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minuses SePmanher 2. 1992 Page 7 James Markman, City Anomey, staled this is nos a final action anal the Resolution comes back before the Council at the nett mee@ng. rrrrr• F2. CONWDFRATION OF AN PP I OF TIWANDA cp IFIC PLAN AMENDMENT A9-03 - C7 S HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision recanmending denial of a request m amend certain dev¢lopment sundanLs within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Continued from June 3, 1992) Staff report preserved by Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, Mayor Stout commented tha! the park land as shown on page 65 of the agenda packet was too small to be useful. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Carncil were: Charles Schulv., Reid ~ Hcllyer, repmsenring U. S. Homes, asked Nat Ne City Council approve the plan amendment allowing 8500 square foot bts. He continued m give background information on the project. Keith Dagaztino, 1565 Cambridgq Redlands, staled they have been working on this project for the last couple of months to gat the kind of projms that the City wants. He stated they want one minor change m the specific plan by making a variation so the lot size. Elvis Pem>. did not agree with lowering dtc lot Sizes. Mayor Stout gave background information on the development of the Etiwanda Specific Pian. He explained that this area is being down-zoned from what was odgL~ally in the Edwartda Specific Plan. Mike Perez, 13245 Victoria, stated he was in favor of lower density. Bmd Buller, City Planneq gave background information abom this project gating its approval and how the 8500 square foot IOLS were artived aL Paul Anchor asked if this would make all Nc Etiwanda area 8500 square toot lots orjust a small portion. Mayor Stout sated this is only a small area if the City Council approves is. Charles Schulze asked That the City Council approve ate Specific Plan amendment 'There being no further respnnsc, the public hearing was closed Mayor Smut stated he was not in favor of This when it came before the Council the first time and still is rmt in favor of it now. Councilmember Alexnndcr sorted he still does not have any problems with dtis project Councilmemher Wright slated she felt with this project being so close m the frceway, it does nor present the type of image the City wants txcausc nc~ lots arc ton small. She did not agree with lowering the IIX sizes and does nos fceI it follows the intent o(the F,tiwandn Specific Plan. Councilmember Williams stamd she agrees with Cotumilmember Wright and felt tors should be k:ft at 10,0(10 square (ceL City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 8 Councilmember Buquet felt U.S. Homes has proceeded in the way they wem directed frmn the previous meeting. He felt they have done what the City wanted them m do and now the Cou«il L saying something else. hfayu Smut stated he was not in agreement with this projat from the beginning. ORUWANCE N0.491 (lust reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE MIMMUM AVERAGE LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT FRUM 10,000 TO 8,500 SQUABS FEET FOR 81.2 ACRES OF LAND ZONED LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF MILLER AVENUE WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, AND MAKING FINDINGS WS SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1100-041-09, 1100.ORI-12, 1100-171- 01 .4ND 13, 1100.181-O1, 1100-141-01 AND 02, AND 1100.191-01 ORDWANCE N0.492 (lust reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TItE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT SIZE REQUIREMEFT FROM 10,000 TO 8,500 SQUARE FEET FOR ALL PROPERTIES ZONED LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL. SOUTH AND EAST OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, AND MAKING FINDNGS iN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOL[J'170N NO. 92-070 A RESOLUTION OF THF- CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT R9-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND CERTAIN DEVELOPh1ENT STANDARDS WITHIN THF, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Wright, s«onded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92.070. Motion carried 3-2 (BUquet and Alcsander voted no). CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 - U.S. HOMES CORP9RATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission s d«ision denying the proposed Tentarive Tract Mep and Design Review of the development of 226 single family lou on RL2 acres of Wnd within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in Jae Luw-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling uni4s per acre), I«ated on the east side o(Etiwanda Avenue, mouth of the Dcvom Freeway, and west of East Avenue -APN; 11(q-041-09, 1100-OSI-02, 1100-171-O1 and 13, I I W-BI-01, 1100-141-01 and 02, and 110(1-191.01. Related File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89.03. (Continued from June 3, 1992) City Council Minutes September 2,1992 Page 9 RESOLUTION N0.92-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14211, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFC PLAN IN THE MEDIUM AND LOW MEDRIM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8-14 AND 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, ARID MAKING FINDINGS W SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100. 04I-09, 1100-081-12, 1100-171-Ol AND 13, 1100-181-01, 1100-14]-0t AND -02, AND ]100.191-01 RESOLUTOON N0.92-072 .4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING TIaE DESIGN REVIEW OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1421 I, TF~ DESIGN REVIEW OF A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMll-Y LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETiWANDA SPECIFIC PLAIN IN THE MEDIUM AND LOW MEDR1M RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (R-14 AND 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETTWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDMGS IN SUPYORT THEREOF • APN: 1100-04]-09, 1100-081-I2, 1100.171-01 AND -13, 1100-IRl-M, 1100-141.OI AND-02, AND I100-019i-01 MOTION: Moved by Wright, sucondcd by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 92-071 and 92-072. Motion carried 3-2 (Baguet and Alesauder voted no). +rr~~a D3. CONSIDERATION OF ECTAELISHING AN IMPROVEMENT AREA WITHIN COMMLCNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91.1 (VICTORIA CCIMMUNITYI AND AUTHORIZATTON TO LEVY AN ADDITTONAI SP IAI_TAX Stall report presented by Linda Daniels, lleputy City Manager. Maynr Stout asked the City Clerk if the Nntice of Intention and Notice of Hearing were on file. Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk, answered yes. Maynr Stout opened the ntceting for public hearing for those to speak in protest of this maltcr. No response was made. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for puhlir. hearing for Nose in favor of this maltcr. Addressing the City Council was: Dan Felin, Hahn Company -general paMCr, HFA Associates (Developer o(ahopping Cemer), stated they am in wmplete corroumence wish the recommendation before the City Council. He stated he would be happy to answer any questions. Mayor Stour asked sniff (or a prasenmtion 9(any protca count of mgistered voters or owners, City Council Minutes September 2. 1992 Page 10 Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, staled thue has beer no written protests received by staff. There being no further rcslwnsc, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION N0.92-237 A RESOLUTION OF 'fHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNA, MAKING CHRTAIN PRELAlINARY FB4D/NGS, PASSING UPON PROTESTS AND APPROVING FINAL REPoRT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams m approve Resolution No. 92-237. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ragan[ absent). RESOLUTION NO. 92-236 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. DECLARING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVEMENT AREA WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITTES DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF AN ADDITIONAL SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH IMPROVEMENT AREA TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92-238. Motion carried 4-0.1 (Baguet absent). •~rr~• Mayor Stout called a recess at 10:43 p.m. in order for the City Clerk m conduct the election for CFD 91-1. The meeting n:convened at 10:52 p.m. r~rWa~ Mayor Stout asked fnr the City Clerk m read the election results. Debm 1. Adams, City Clerk, slated Here were 93 yes votes (or PropostOons A and B. RESOLUTION NO. 92-239 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A "MELLO- ROOS" COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 SPECIAL ELECTION MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92-239. Morion carriW unanimously, 5.0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read Ole Title of Ordinance No. 502. ORDINANCE NO. 502 (lust reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIl'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THF: LGVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN AN IMPROVEMENT AREA OF AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 11 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander m waive full reading arul set second reading of Ordinance No. 502 for September 1G, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. •+~~r• G1. CON~[D RATION OF AN ORDINAN cTAe (SHIN R ATIONS AND PERM]T RHO tIR M NTg FOR TAXI ABC RVICB (Continued from August 19, 1992) Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Nianagcr. Councilmember Wrigh[ suggested ihat a sex offender be grounds for revocation or denial of a taxi cab permit. Duane Baker. Assistant to the City Manager, suggested This be added under Section 8.030.090 "Grounds for Denial or Revrcadon of Taxi Cab Driver's Permit (seepage 160 of agenda peckcQ. CouncilmGnbtt Buquet stated after reviewing dte survey on page 155, he would suggest modification of changing the liability insurance limit to SI,f100,0(l0.00 and intteasing Ne property m SI,000,000.00 as is consistent with other cities. Mayor Stout gave information relating m this matter from discussions of the last meeting. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Gene Stallings, President of Yellow Cab Company, presented information on taxicab services. He did not think the Ordinance complied with SB944 end did not think the City Council was receiving all Ne information he bad been givin6 w staff. Councilmember euquet slated he felt the cab companies were playing one against the other m get what they wanted. He stated all he wants m do is put the Cily in compliance with regulations. N1r. Sullings felt idle Council Icft the Ordinance as it is now, them would not bo cab service available in da years W come. Councilmrmber Buquet felt there was plenty o(dme in the futum to change the Ordinance. if down the line changes rkcdcd b be made. Mayor Smut agreed with Councilmember euquet. Councilmember Alexander fell possibly mom lime should be taken m look at the information Mr. Smliings was presenting and that possibly dre item should be continued for a couple of weeks. Them being no response, the public hc~ring was closed. Debm J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 501. lames Markman, City Atmmcy, reminded the Council them wcm the two amendments m the Ordinance as pmsentcd. City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 12 ORDINANCE NO.501 (lust reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CrTY COUNCIL OF 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.30 EMFfTLED "TAXICAB SERV'ICE," THEREIN REGULATING AND PERMTITING THE OPERATION OF TAXIS MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Williams to waive full reading. Motion caried unanimously, 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Williams m set second reading of Ordinance No. 50] for September 16, 1992. Modon carticd 4-1 (Alcsvidcr no). Mayor Stout asked that updates come bxk m the Council az any problem ocew-s, comphdnts are received, etc. .».~•• G2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPERTY OWNER RFnt ms;T TO FORM NASSFCr:ME TDISTRICfIN SOLITJI EIiWANDA Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assis~anl a the City Manager. He pointed out lepers had been submiued by lack Schrader, who waz in favor of the formation of dre Assessment District, and Ice and Beverly White, who opposed the formation of the Assessmrnt District Mayor Stom opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: lim Clark, 6862 Edwanda Avenue, did not feel he could afford the assessment increase because he is a farmer with twenty acres and does not have the income to pay for it. Elvva Perez stated she was against the Assessment Distrbl and did cot want to be included in the area, She stated she owns 2.5 acres. Kathy Whratley Solovia informed the Council about the mahanics of Assessment Disvicts Nat had been formed in Santa Ana and Fullerton, and how they related to the proposed Assessment District in Rancho Cucamonga. Mike Robbins, 757fi Eliwanda, Myohoji Tcmpla, fell the Assessment Disvict would not beneRt his organizaGmr, only the big developers. Mike Perez, 13245 Vicmria, stated his property is not in tho prr>[wsed Assessment District area, but fell the City Council should be careful and advised dre Council about oNer Assessment Districts he had bcen involved in. Stm~c W headcy, 10601 Civic Center Drive, sorted they arc azking the Council m allow Uem to spell then money to front the initial asussment engineer consultant for the Assessmem Disvict lohn Scibcl, representing Loveland Church, staled they are in favor of the Assessment Disvict Alfonso Hughes, of Loveland Church, stated they are in favor of the Assessment Disuicl. Phyllis Bonshire, southeast comer of Race Linc and Eliwanda, sorted she could not afford the assessment herself. City Council Minums September 2,1992 Page 13 Tlure being no further response, the public hearing was closed Mayor Stout stated he did not want m put stunegnc out of their property, but suggested something mould be developed where those that arc interested ;i the Assessment District pay for il. He staled he wanted m know the number of alkmatives available in settlng this uD w be included in dre Engineer's Repot MOTION: Moved by Buyuet, seconded by Alexander to authorize stag in continue with Ure proceeding, prepare an RFP or RFQ in order to get an assessment engineer on board, and w authorize staff m prepare the neccstary mimbursement agreement(s) with the property owners to use thev money m pay Cor the crosultants. Councilmemher Buquet wanted to add Ne provision that the City insures that as part of the process that the issues raised as far as deferrals arM impacts on dte pngerty owners that could not afford the assessment be considered. Motion cartied unanimously, 5-0. No items were submitted. •.~r~• H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS ~~...• L COUNCIL BUSINESS ^. DI~lISt10N ON ALTFRNATIV TO ASC SSM NT D] TRI TS (Continued from August 19, 1992) Staff report presenmd by Joe O'Neil, City Engi~. Mayor Stout suggested shat thu Public Works Subcommittee study this and then come back m Ne entire City Council with their analysis in appmzimalely CA days. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright w refer this mauer m the Public Works Subcommittee for further analysis and for the information to come back m the Council at a later dale. Motion cartieA unanimously, 5-0. r.»~.• 12. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT LIBRARY MASTER PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Staff report presented by Linda Daniels, Deputy Cily Manager, who stated them is a meeting on September I S with Harry Mays of the County on the Library matter, Councilmcmber Buquet (ch the City needed le star, conversadons wish the County mgarding the take-over of dte library and get more aggressive. MOTION: Moved by Smut. seconded by Buyuet to adopt the Library Master Plan and Implementation Plan as prepared by Ray Hnit and Assoclntes. Motion carcied unanimously, 5-0. •+~r.. No items wam idenGficd for the next meeting. City Council Minutes September 2, 1992 Page 14 +rr+r• No communication was made tram the public. +rr+sr L. AD IOIIRNMENT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to Executive Session m diuuss properly negotiations regarding the Sports Compkz. Motion eartirA uronimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned m Executive Session at 12:16 am. not to mconve~. Respectfully submiucd, Debra 1. Adams, CMC City Clerk Appoval: September 16, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on WeMesday, September 16, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rartnho Cucamnnga, Calitomia. The meeting waz called b order at 7:23 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout Present were Cowrcilmembers: Wi0iam 1. Alexander, Charles 1. euquer II, Diane Williams, Pamela 1. Wright. end Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: lack Lam, Cily Manager, lames Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Rick Gomex, Community Development INrector, Tany Smith, Park Planning/DevelopmentSuperintendent; Brad Buller, City Phmner, Sseve Hayes, Associate Planrra; Jac O'Neii, City Engineer, Jce Stofa, Associate Engineer; Jim Frost, City Treasurer, Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Alanagement Analyst 1; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fim Protectlon District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk. ••~r•• 81. Presentation of Proclamation designating the week of October 4 Nrough October 11, 1992 as Native American Week. Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to a group of Native American Indians. If was note0 that the correct dares for Native American Wcek were Ocmber 6 through Octotrer 12. B2, Jeanne Lochart, on behalf of the Rancho Cucanonga Community Foundation, extended an invitation to the City Council for the opening of the Bcst Western Heritage Inn to be held on October 1 tram 5;3D m 8:00 p.m. She encoumgcd the City Council, their friends and neighbors m attend and m support fhe Foundation's goal of doing things for the community. Councilmemher Alexander mentinnGl a lot of cultural things the people sce in the City have been and will 6e done by the Foundation. •.~r~• No communication was made from the public. City Council Minutes September 16, ]992 Page 2 •rr~s• D. CONSENT CALENDAR DI. Approval of Minutes: August 5, 1992 D2. Approval of Warrants, Rcgis4'r Nos. 8/16N2 and 9/1/91: and Payroll ending 8R7r92 for the total amount o[ 51.069,386.00. D3. Approval to receive arM file current Investment Schedule ac of August 31, 1992. D4. Alcoholic Bevemge Application for 2UOff Sale Grneral for Alpha Beta Company, Alpha Beta Store #235, 6753 Camclian. D5. Alwholic Beverage Application for 21-0(f Sale General for Alpha Boa Company, Alpha Bem Strre #178, 9640 Base Line Road. D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application (or Otf-Sale General, OfI-Sale Beer & Wine, for Thifty Corporation (P- 12), Thrifty Corporation, 8760 19th Sweet. D7. Alcoholic Bcvemge Application for Otf-Sale Gen¢ml, OOf-Sale Beer & Wine, fm Thrify Corporauon (P- 12), Thrifty Cororation, 9650 Base Lix Road. D8. Approval to uans(er 540,000.00 from Fund 76-4130.7920 to Account No. 75.4130fi028 for additional appraisal and cortsulmnt work for CFD 88-2. D9. Approval of an Appeal m Variance 92-02 -Silva - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision [o deny the request m reduce the requved interior side yam setback from 5 feet to 6 inches from the property linr. Fnr a singic iam0y noma in the Low Residential DLstrict (2~ dwelling noire P°r e:tal, loca:°-! et ! 00T, rmnwaat St:.c: - APN: 1077-041-64. RESOLU770N NO. 92-2A2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE APPEAL AND APPROVWG VARIANCE NO. 92-02, REDUCING THE REQUIRED [N7ERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 6 INCHES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-0 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 10077 IRONWOOD STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1077-041-64 D10. Approval to designate the CenVal Public School (also known as Sweeten Hall), Iceated at 9324 San Rcmardino Road, as a Histcxic Landmark - APN: 208-111-f19. Cily Council Minutes September 16,1992 Page 3 RESOLUTION N0.92-243 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 92-O1, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOL (SWEETEN HALL), LOCATED AT 9324 SAN BERNARDWO ROAD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK, AND MAKWG FWDWGS W SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-111-09 Di 1. Approval m exaute Processional Services Agreement (CO 92-063) for additional appraisal of CFD 88-2 trot m ezceetl $28,0(q.00, to be funded from Account No. 75-0130-b028, D12. Approval to grant a Conswction and Maintenance Easement to the Southern California Edison Company ro provide service at the Spore Complex Pmjat on Artow Highway and Rochester. D13. Appmval to exaute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation of n Portion of a Master Planned Stara Dtain Facility in conjunction with development of Tract No. 12820, boated in Jasper Street approximately 180 fcet north and 360 tat south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Southland Deveopment Carpomtion, RESOLUTION N0.92-244 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVWG RE[h1BURSEMF.NT AGREEMENT FOR WSTALhATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAW FACILITY IN CONNECI70N WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 12820 D14. Approval of Parcel Map 11287 and lmprovemenl Saurity Riders, boated at the noMwest conwf of Church Strcet and Elm Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes of California. RESOLUTION N0.42-1A5 A RESOLU t tUrv OF 't HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 11287 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RIDERS D15. Approval m execute Improvement Agrecement Extension for Tract 12832 -Day Creek Boulevard, boated on proposed Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Vicmria Park Lane, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION N0.92-246 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12832 -DAY CREEK BOULEVARD City Council Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 4 D16. Approval m accept improvements, Release of bonds and file a Notice of Completion for Parcel Map i 1685, located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlack Avenue. Releare: Faithful PerfornimKe Bond (Street) S 50,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (SUeet) 5,(80.00 RESOLUTION N0.42-247 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11685 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D17. Approval m aacpt improvements, release of bonds and file a notice of completion for Parcel Map 11838, located on dte nonhu~est comer of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lam. Release: Faithful Performance BorA (Street) S 608,(g0.(p RESOLUTION N0.92.258 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTBVG THE PUBLC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11838 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DI B. Approval m release Maintenance Guarantee Bond far Tract 13748 -Banyan Street Bridge, located on Banyan Saect at the Deer Crcek Chanml. Release: Mainnitance GuarantceBOnd S 22,900.00 D19. Approval w accept the Basketball HaMcour Retrofit Project, CO 92-022, as Complete, Release Bonds and authomc the Community Development Director to Ble a Nodce of Completion. Release: Faithful Performame Bond $ 44,097.00 RESOLUTION N0.92-2A9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BASKETBALL HARDCOURT RETROFIT PROJECT AS COMPLETE AT CHURCH STREET AND WINDROWS PARK AND AUTHORIZING TF~. FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D20. Approval to accept the 1992 Tree Planting Program, CO No. 92-039, as Complete, Release Bonds and auihorirc the City Engineer to Ble a Notice of Completion. City Council Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 92-250 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFfE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL[FORN(A, ACCEF'1'ING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM, CO 92-039, AND AVCHOR121NG THE FB.iNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanim~_s!y. 5-0. a~r~+. E. CONSENT ORnINANCF.R E1 CE ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY MR. COMPANY Gene Stallings, Yellow Cab Company, requested tha[ two amendments be made to Section 8.30.050, Permit Feas. He stated The Ordinance inquires an annual reapplicadon as if it were a brand new application. lie felt this was unnecessary. He alw felt taxi company permits should be transferrable upon City Council approvai. He smted Section 8.30.070 should alm be changed so that each driver is not required W have a permit i( they have a valid permit from a City or County that requims en individual driver's permit or license and is acceptable and approved by the City Manager or Acdng Chiet of Police. He mentioned his drivers are screened 6y Pomona Police Department. He scaled they will agme m be a central check place for other cities. His last request was that Rancho Cucamrmga adopt a section for determination of public convenience and rrocccsity which he felt was cridcal for Ne continuance of mxi cab service. James Markman, City Atmmcy, smted he reviewed the in[ormadon Mr. Stallings was presenting this afternoon with Duane Baker. He sated he did not want m go bxk into the issue of need and necessity. He stated he had nut had an opportunity to consider Mr. Stallings' changes. Hu also stated as far as using anoher Police Departmem, he was not sure chat slat( has had an opportunity to check This out or be comfortable with it. Councilmcmber Alexander fch the information should be considered and bring this back for first reading. Councilmcmber Buquct stmcd he did not have a problem with looking at some additional information. James Irfarkmaq City AUOmey, stated the imm~t of this ordinance was to protect We public as staff Thought the Cily Council wanted Them to do, and not m rely on another City. Councihnember Buquct asked Captain Zciner if it would be redundant for Rancho Cucamonga to do the ~ngerprim check. bxk,4ound check, etc., if Pomona does the same Thing. Capain Zciner stated they would be cnncemed if the same person Pomona was dealing with was the same person Ran; ho Cucamonga was dealing wnh. Cnuncilmember Alexander felt more time should be given to the new infnnnadon presented by Mr. Smllings. Mayor Scout felt the Council should gn ahead trod adopt this Ordinance and then mvise it after it is in affect for awhile. He did not think Rancho Cucamonga should rely an anotherjurisdicdon for checking out the drivers. City Council MInaICS September i6, 1992 Page 6 Councilmember Wright slated she had some problems with Section 8.30.030, the application for taxi cab service, and felt numbers 9 and 10 should be n;viewcd on a yearly bazis. She stated she wasn't sure of Ne idea to have other tides check out a person because she didn't think other tides had the same standards as Rancho Cucamonga. She felt the need for doing this was for public safety of Nc residents. She felt it should be adopted, altipugh she agrud with Mayor Stout about reviewing it after a period of dme m see if it needs to be changed. Mayor Stout sated he (elt uncomfortable wiN ha~~ing Pomona doing the invesdgadon witlwut some kind of en agreement with them and Nat they might want some kind of payment for Netr services. He azked Chief Zeincr to talk wiN Pomona on tle idea of fingerprinting and records checking fa our torsi cab permits. Councilmember Alexander stated he did not want Rancho Cucamonga to become over-regulative and eventually charge the public (or a service. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. read Ne title or Ordinance No, 501 ORDINANCE NO. 501 (second reading) AN ORUINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING ANEW CHAPTER 8.30 ENTITLED "TAXICAB SERVICE," THEREIN REGULATING AND 1'ERMITTJNG THE OPERATION OF TAXIS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by W it liams W waive full reading of OMirance No. 501, Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Wright seconded by Williams to approve Ordinance No. 501. Mmion Carried 4-I (Alexander nor). v~srvv E2. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABI ISHI AN IMPROVEMENT AREA WITHIN ('OMMllNiTV FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITYI AND AUTHORIZATION TO LEVY AN ADDITIONAL SPECfA~~ Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, reaA Ne title of Ordinance No. 502. ORDINANCE NO. 502 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THF- CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZMG THE LEVY OF A SPF-C1AL TAX IN AN IMPROVEMENT AREA OF AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MO'HON: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams m waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 502. Moton camicd unanimously, 5-0. . ~. «.• Cuy Council Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 7 F. ADVF:RTISF.D PI!RLIC HF.ARlNGA Mayor Stout slated he is in receipt of a letter from Carl's Ir. thaz they are withdrawing their appeal. He staled the item wa~ld be removed from the agenda. ACTION: Item removed from agenda. ....~• G1. OC NSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF SIGN PERMIT 92-141 -TEXACO - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying the inslallatinn of a canopy sign at an misting service stadon within the Specwl Commercial Disvict of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located et 8Ifi6 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-112- 20. Staff report prcsentcd by Steve Hayes, Association Planner, along with a video of the Ixation. Mayor Stout opened the mccung for public hearing. Addressing the City Camcil were: Nancy Cashey, Quicl Brothers Signs, presented pictures to the City Council of the gas Station, She stated they Aid not feel a monumem sign would be emugh for the public to mice the station. Councilmember Ruqud ackeJ if Texaco was prying the station ownu for the impmvemenLS. Ms. Cashey smtcd yes, but she did not feel they woulJ pay for the cost of it unless it was a canopy sign. Shc did not fed it should be on the fmnl of the building. A wwnan owner of the Texaco sutinn smtcA they want m improve the appearance of the cation. She smted Texaco would loan diem the money (or the sign but that it has to be their way or they would not loan her the money. Shc sated Texaco world not loan them any additional money in order to comply with the Planning Commission's standards. City Council Minutes September t6, 1992 Page 8 Mayor Stout Ceh Texaco would be receptive N whatever kind of sign it took N bring in more money (or Ne s[adon. He tell overyone Nat drives by Nere knows Nat is a gas station. He felt Ne problem was Ne access gelling in and out of Nc station. Councitmember W right commentrd on Ne revenue Ne City receives from Ne gaz sales of Ne station. Owner of Texaco smdon felt it people could not see Ne Texaco stmion, they would go b Upland for Ne'v gas. She also felt Ne money from Ne station would help the economy si[uafion in Rancho Cucamonga. Councilmember Buquet sated he did not think Ne canopy sign would help her business. He suggested that Ne City hdp her deal wiN Texaco. He felt she warmntcd special Considemdon. He felt only a monument sign would attract more business. Mayor Slout staled Ne Ciry has had great 5aecess in working wiN big corporations in getting Nem t0 do what Ne City requires of them. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated Nere arc a lot of options Nat should be considered. He felt the Ciry Council should deny Nc appeal wilhoul prejudice. Councilmember Buquet fch staff should work wiN Tezaw N came around N the City's regWauons - na necessarily a monument sign. RESOLUTION NO. 92-252 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING SIGN PERMIT 92-I41 REQUESTING THE INSTALLATION OF A CANOPY SIGN AT AN EXISTTNG SERVICE STATION WITHIN THE SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8166 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SCPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-t t2-20 MOTION: Moved t+y Buquet, seconded by Wright to deny die appeal wiNout pmjudice and approve Resoludon No. 92-252. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The City Council asked for updates on Ne meetings that would take place wiN Texaco in Ne resolution of Nis matter. v ~~~rr G2. S~af(rcport Drcsented by Jac Sto(a, Associate Engineer. Mayor SNirI opened the meeting for public hearing, There being no response, Ne public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 9 RESOLUTION N0.92-253 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE RELOCA'T10N OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND CONSTRUCfiON OF STREET tAdPROVEMENTS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND DIAKINC FINDINGS M S[IPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquct, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92-253. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. rrrrr• HI. CONSIDERATION i0 WITHDRAW TH XISTIN N XATTON APP ATIONS F[ D N CON111NCTION WITH T D V OPM NT OF TIW NDA NORTH SP IFI P N -The City Council Subcommiuce recommends that the City Council accept their rewmmertdaGon m withdraw LAFCO Annexations No. 2624 and No. 2625 in thaz Here is no County support or oNer property owner support (or the annexation requesfc a[ this time. Staff report presented by Rick Comez, Community Development Director. Mayor Stout opened the mceting for public comments. Addressing the City Council was: Tim Johnson, Wcst Valley Foothills Manager for San Bernardino Courtly, thanked staff for working with him and keeping him informed. He read the following statemene "AS aIi of us mcognize «m physical and financial development of Etiwanda North has stalled because of a powerhtl mix of (actors, including the weak economy, the death of the principal developer, the lack of bank financing, and the pmsent lack of infmswcture. In short, we arc in a real Catch-22, both at the City and County level on any planning or development activity in the area right now. In This dormant phase of Etiwanda activity, it is logical shat you may wish to rethink the pending annexations. If you elect to make that decision, and I'm not hem tonight to ask you to be nay or yeah on that particular item, it does Wise rho question as to the inconsistency of continuing to pursue the City's Etiwanda NoM Specific Plan and the related Resource Management Plan and the Infraswcture Phasing Plan on an area that is not within dte City limiu. No responsible person would doubt the need m pUn for whatever may occur throughout the Etiwanda North area. In panicWar, the planning to insure the preservation of worthy habitat is best done heforo [hat habitat is altered in the process of changing uses. But both the County and the City have thoroughly done the groundwork for the master planning up ur the necessary point Both jurisdictions have more than adequate knowledge of the infrastructure needs of the area under any development scenario. We at the County have spem a substantial sum in recent months on new. third-party biological field work in connection with the necessary flood convnl improvements than both of our jurisdictions need. Specifically, that mlates to the Bureau of Reclamatlon Loan Application for the San Sevaine Creek Project, and that infommtlrm, the day it is available to me, will be available to your staff as well, and I expect that within a monU. Neither jurisdicdon can move further in any tangible way until a source of funding exists. With no development and li«Ic bunk financing, That hording simply is not on the table for eidmr one of us as far as wo can see. As a follow-up to your actions this evening, 1 would ask you to consider, at some subsequent meeting, whether or not further action nn the Specific Pian outside your present bourdarics is an unnecessarily adversarial step that can cloud the atmosphcm o(nego«ation drat must proceed any annexation agrwmenC' He stated he would he happy to answer any questions that the Council might have. City Council Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 10 Mayor Stout stated the Etiwanda NoM Specific Plan has already been adopted by the City Council and that there is no [urther acdon pending on it. Arad Buller, City Planner, added (here are two documents that go along with the ENSP, the Rcsouree Management Plari and dtc In(raswcturc Phasing Plan. Mr. Johnson smted the bottom line is going to be what form of open space and how i[ is managed and how it is paid for. He did not fee! This was aCity/County qucstlon or dispute. He fell there was a cloud of confusion with Ne Resource Management Plan wiN the Resource Regulatory Agencies, i.e., U.S. Fish and W ildlifc Service. Councilmember Wright stated the assessment of political support was no[ a consideration of hers when she initially voted to agree with the annexation. She stated the City fought long and hard for that and should have control of that area as it should have been pan o(the City limits m begin with. Councilmember Buquet slated he wished everyone could sit down and work something out. Mayor Stout felt this area should have been a pan of the City's boundaries to begin with. He did not think dte County can service dmt particular area as well as the Ciry can. He smted the City is withdrawing the annexation rcyucst because there is no support to get it approved. He hoped that carte day it could be annexed into the City. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to withdraw the application. Motion carried 4-1 (Wright tto) ~r~. ~. H2. Sta((mport pmscnted by Lmda Deputy City Manager. Councilmcmber Williams questioned Exhibit D of the Icasc. Linda Daniels, Deputy Cily Manager, smtcd included in the memo that was disvibuted, Exhibit D is no longer nece5.evy. She. cited the manu(adurer's model number under Section 32, page 29, which negates the need fa Gzhibit D. Councilmember Williams 54ited it still does not give speci0cations (or the scombomd. James Markman, Crty Attaaey, sated the only purpow o(thc lease is to pin it down as b which Scoreboard we arc getting. Councilmember Auquct asked when the details will he worked out for the sceurity of the stadium. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, stated the City has had initial discussions with the team and that they would lx hiring off-duty police of[iccrs or reserve officers, anA there will be standards established so that the number of aaendecs will require so many security personnd on duty, Councilmember Buqud slated his main concern was Thal he did not wam them to go out and hire 'Ice Blow" saurity to come in and be responsible. He wanted to make sure dw City stays on top of that in order m get adequate security. City Council Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 11 Councilmember Williams asked how should the Council a_ecure themselves a comfort level for these items that are not spelled out in the Iwse. She asked how does the City be sure that both parties agree and understand the very same thing. lames Markman. City Attomcy, stated what dre City is Irving to do is make the team msponsiblc for giving a reasonable Icvcl of security. He smtcd no one knows what Ihm means to the operation of the stadium because nn one has operated it yet. He felt operational memorandac should be developed as they go along to get what the Ciry feels comfonablc with. Councilmember Buquet stated he was not comfortable with how dte lease was worded when it mentions security because the details am na spelled out. He wanted to make sure the City had a suong operational agreement for the stadium. Mayor Stout felt the Icase should be signrd and for the derails to be worked out by Dec. 1 through written memoranda. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet m authorize. the lease ro tie ezecmed, ano (or staff and the City Attorney Io he directed, along with the law enforcemem component, to begin the process of developing a memorandum of understanding with regards to the security issue, including the gerreml operations of the facility which should include operations independent of the baseball operation itself, field end stadium maintenance included. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Councilmember W illiams stated she wanted m go on record by stating a few years ago she voiced her wncem shout the alcohol sale in the smdium and wanted to make it very clear the agreement was made in refererxz b her corrcems which she was very pleased about. She sated everyone was in agreement about forming a family unit wiNin the ballpark which was an ezcellenl way to address this problem. She Celt families deserve a choice to be around this type ofactivity. She fell the alcohol and tobacco free area was a great soludon. $he was pleased that Uw staff arM tier collcagncs were in agmcmcm with her. No ia;ms wcrc submitted. L COUNCIL BUSINESS •~r~r• No items wcrc idemificd for the neu mecdng. K. COM ML'NICATIONC FRnM TIIP p1IPI I[' K1. Rcyucst from Millie Glenney of the Windrows community m waive fcc for use of sountl monitor for ncighhorhoW picnic. Roberta Copper gave information about their picnic. She Inld about the monitoring fee and that they have never had to pay for this before. Shc stated the ncighMrs do not have the money to pay for the monimring system. She felt because They arc volunteers for Iheir neighhorhood they should be given the refund for the monitoring system. Ciry Council Minutes September l6, 1992 Page 12 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to waive the fce. Motion cartied unanimously, 5-0. Mayor Stou[ added that staff was only doing what the OMinence states. rrrrr• MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Willams N recess m Executive Session to discuss pending litigation regarding Morrow vs City of Rancho Cucamonga, and for the Executive Session to adjourn to a join[ meeting with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Founda0on m be held on Wednesday, September 23, 1992, 7:00 p.m. in the Rains Rnom. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The Council recessed at 9:32 p.m., not m reconvene. Respcc(fully submitted, Debra 1. Adams, CMC City Clerk Appmvcd: mss - mm 'c- m~• :°<e a ~ =roN rrva rmo. ,.rvm• rv +i: oo'o ooe ooe ii mr..~r.~rr_r~r•rrr..r~~rr~.-rr.....-.~-r~~rr.~~-.. ~.~~..r ~.-~.rnrrr r ~ . .• .. ..• .. . • z . ... a .. ~ N q 2 rv\J AmON \\ v mVT m wwr ~ o' \F s PPf f rve° ~ miw • a z ~ sm`. ° ~N .- .~iar Win. . N • J r~~ ° -J r'> YJ J JNm Vl JI ~rc JOJ yy ~=}wiu JWSZT~f°LL S~2J mJ• mfSa Jn wJ ~O~ f G m ZEU 6 CmFU2~ LLYw N~ VR>• uw'LC~I _OZF___ .n J uiw OZIJ ni wm.. O°ti L wY~JUC.LG ILL° C?IttfJwf wOw LL~JOLfr a niZ SY LLOVUN uZ0 f.prv ~~.wioi .f.o~ no wr ° f`o u 2 JVV °ta L2U o o.. °SV ~ usY rcza ziz m.az ra. ~cr: z>> >>«.~x>wN~r~ov~a~°aN.Nm~.J.mNnmo°.+rmJ+ana:nw..w o.,r.~ P Y ~ u u F ~ Y Z u O 7 2Z m wVV a^lr ~ th' nVi WIJn h Z 4ts u^ JLJ JEU OJwOtV up.f ~[i ~Jr Y]f Ja ~s .'.ni u FSU uJJ Klm']w nZ zi- _ °rLL Wozi. mo f LLtVSauyfrOOC fLY wai VvWNr ~iJ\J~f G J °±zz JLio ~°: JJ.izo-n+ooo inn ~~onaa ~S• /Yefaa4YaVafeaYYfmmmgmmpmmFNmVUUVUUVJVUUUJVUU VOCOG N Prv o'ONNOa ~P mIPN?m NIT ^Omf • , nn4 nw~ ~vr nrvmry .~I. ~ymingyrv w.f rvnNm nln nnrv .rm mw h rv aao ooe o00 .+ a >~ ~ _ ~ .. ~ ego ¢ : ~ _ a i~ i ¢ waa ~°J 2 ¢ ~ o\~ _ ¢ Ni° °Jm Jp _ o-2~P0 ..r~~.w. wi °. n° zr~. iW .. .r~o c°°~ m n » ¢ rvii sin NaW wiLL ii » . ~j NCO ~n lV2 __ i+Ji in~0 m ~ I > i ~n ~+ ~+ V w 2 i~f ¢Sw __ _ L0. ¢Sw > Z uZin OZZ ~ZJ /~ ~ S'.~ n Y J i O'+ J o.+J ~u'n an. iz¢ .i.i: ¢.io ryi~ .+.+~ wig u+L¢nn¢6~OY~>¢n~-i)N O~n¢I~n>.¢wim-ten n~/V4O ¢~nLi¢~rii¢ZWLL¢+~n E /~ J Y. tD 2 r J u ~ 2+ 0. ~ Y 7Vn T. ^ rV J uZF raw O J viOr OZ~ NSa Ot¢ S J~]Z i,¢ Zjw SJL •J.n 1 ~i is NVti wJo- rw 2F LLy¢ +}O FZZ ¢2~ NN ~ oJV: ~?o¢ wz~ 2 JLW Nv.~• iiW.z}}.zip ninwi .ae ~°nii. .iaazz >s ~Y• .iiw >Y¢¢ZM12~2C OOJL~Z> ___ ~~]~l J}s > C] n O • Y• '] t) O /l O (] O w .u w w w u LL u u u V u V V V) t'! V V V L Z i i L Z C Z 2 1 2 I Z ~^ ~+ 1 ~e ~[ v~ Y K¢ ~( a 1'G mVV in Lryrv ^~ a .. _~ ~~ ~ ~rv~"'r=.. :~ m ~ .. Irv.. ....n rv. m .rmn nT .. .,. Opp C~a mJO a2 oOp O00 • < .1. u ni ~i 2 a ~~ n mom r ~J .. : m ., P a ooa °w ~c `J 11 Vr ZOrJG4 + UPpVZO e[Sw ZV Sv Ju4 _ rvluJl~ ZI 10 » w \\o OJnw SAO ¢Ja JSr 21 \\e0 OS Jowue n n~ .n PP Y2~ VVm LLJ ZI Klw ISz ppm b\~n ttU' ZV 2N OpN ~2U r2>OSW k~ i2 _ oSr_wSikr a ~. J K2i >i NiVSZV 9iu Ow u < r V J z w u 2UUS~OVOZu uJ JZ u2Y wJ~l LLIJ r3aVwZJ~Y OqJ J 2f Jw O u Aw I• 2 r U OJ 2J W ~ 2 DY VJ JS zLU UZ z26 6tN H SY V ¢LL i w •VV JZO _ r2 Li ~tlY SOVLL w2rm 7ZJ ~ wL> 1SL wtV JiU S~ ~O~ i3JPYOrr iSU •kmZJiw w202 •7_O__ JI N +m NrOOWS2w~Sti~YN4V wiry wzim N m •2• n~J Y? 92SZ JSOhJruJW'9SIr J23UG~ I220V r'~`Or _ __ ___ r0000~ +_JZ2l X21 JJJJJJJJ z [ SZ S 2 Z0004uLLLG4i4uuLL 6RZ¢u'Y m~~ NOT• awn 3VO nNr ~-~ .an r~nh??a 'Jh +~rvrJ /']`~M?~Prvp +~ mrmm~Mm n .v m .~ ~ ~ P mpn J~ n n m ~ u, u 2 O n ;p v s\ aw Z OJ JO o N~ `}¢ i v, 1 CZ Va t,- ~, Z_Jw i o=a v~ Sui Hsi W' y m OL' mOm p wOVi2¢ ~NLL ZLL uu ~ ¢2D X00 ~ 7Lf _ ~ LLu LL fir ~ v~ V V m u2Z NS~n Z,fr rtiw cl J n j N a: ax3 ~S~n ZZ - Yip Yz ozo im a~ .~izw°zyza ,2 :z: LLizzzz¢ ..z2 aa~N~.. ~., ,., ..,ter,.. ~u~.r..'-~iz222i2 ..-, .. .. .~ ^yo om. am v,., ~., ~ s ..,, .. .. nr 'I :~mm., nn , ~ • rv lr a P _NP i< V61 =~0 '•WO OJ6 o- ¢ . 9 N~L• P~f \• ): ~~ J• <~ ~D •z i¢ •>• i i i i i .Oil ~ ~ • ~ i ~W~ •Z• ~<• ~i• ~<• ~O• •O ~W~ e o e a mtDNM1_gPeDeDDeeeeemgP fP<NPmNPa O NPPO<m OPNOOOOOaO aNT wTP NNPPNp wpm N F N NgNTONmNONmO< p N .. m NwT w N . r«, NfP T w A n O n .w~w~ ~wNw~w JmaNq~hmfN Nmhf PemNmtnmNmPe..N maNgNmPOwNTa PowNT• ~iiimamma<°OOaZZoo<u.pwo<oea°Nr°1°•h°1°-°h~~°. :.°. wh .w•wh non ~.w•n~rN•~nw.N• gPPPg0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 OamvaO n.~n~nN1~1•n1•I•MFwhwhhhnFMnnNhYnnnl~M nl•M1 FPMNnNI•NN.•n W 1 I I 1<1 Imm m > m >m IY 1< u b N N=mPm wP ~j N W m o i w oao.\n fo i+ f .i. wioe~~ ~ e a e wm ~ a a a hohyh PT ~. i~~¢zaeN fN r h i nnn •1 a Y zNhmL W m a` wT v VV V,NVmwN < V< m ~<•fh<wh • i~ m V V ii V j WV mP Y iY Y <V w J Y ww V V V VOV>Vh \ > W> 1•. NN .1¢ F .V .. W V .. m ~ iN\ w ~~. N JMm .Zw O V.Vi M.Vi 1 »O h ~ WfOJPC •J 7 J tJ J JJ ry i NiJJ JWiV \ O WWw <WY« O OVZ ry W V yyya ZNjVj y'<V¢N\Owj y O• iN L Si0 WJWNW i N301NDwi1 jN~a7 <7 ~J \ \ \ V Y « 1 iONMi f VOWF<Ow <TO f0 O O¢m .~ O m P O ii< WjmWWNi i Lw6Wiu.im JN i •1 i~D iWW N1L MW2LL<h\ JW 'J \ hhm Nm0 Mh NLOOWMOm¢hsh00 JO hw hO0 O N j jWiJi iONW miwf<f6Z WJ h • OWM<O\N mhOVWhf fLNOwOh J4 Whh y O fNi uWWNi< IjiiVfW¢WLV<NfMZ O; i ILS O O O iL0 FS<OhOiWwwWDi w_fjU_U f im_W h\__W FN W_W_ C< ipN ZMLOO< V W V V V V V V W JJVNiWV¢YWJW7f02Wytp¢JN J..JZ< »f V VY<hUh< VUV O\Z<hGJmWSJUFVJ• VVOWNV WWW 6:Mf YNNNM~ZYJ L¢JFLLhOMiN06 ZLF mMJUOWZmMW\OMWVj22NiVZVW NO¢OiY > ¢ j i > > > f J9<..>71Lw\W>wi=aW000fWMW:Y :W>f WIL f »N•NCLNNO>T¢06 yO¢UUiO>J> O LDm•O hO0 S M = N P W F O U V O ! V j i_ _ ¢ _ FI . h N 'J J 1• > N V W u uil'L: <s D h.W. Yf D h iN S O Y i< NJ < i O NmV W i >D• 6W YO h F W f.VLL O N VV< JOL ./ WW Z IL J mUOVVi<V sLh WYp WO< N< O > N iN7J1 • Z O MZ WOU V< V V F>NNDN'J< ZI•INW>O .[Nwi O 9V 1 L 20 <V )WN 6ZZZ• UNZV <VWWh _ wiOaNN y ii U N NWWtJ` < JN~~ M YN NOhU~W VQM i JOJ 2 2 W W NWNNO~fZ M100 VY M1Z «JY FV7WO VN Jh S m 'J< M1 __ OOBW<>O <iC Fi > OTWOV<~< NJWJNN w N iJrYi VO 'f O L i 1• W>N2YhiWNNfiJOZNLW00 •YS iVN Wi L i O > <OiN WO npDJWONWiNY O Of WY w V L m J <YNOZOO¢YJ<J~jV¢VyytifZYSNhl6 <Y.<.Y Nh ww~ i J V fVJmViJiO)V60M466JJJY<WM1<Ji0 YJJ>VN 06W ~i '~ Jifi« « N i3 .f <WZSN0000 ~ WO< Vi) N 6 Z N < ~ ff « « mOm000OOYVVUUJVUYVVYUV UOOOOW WWW O q wONfnPPw~. I•mOTOa>FPNNNNOTOONO NPNMfT aT• P w wPNWPNaPNmTNmNPNggwPNgMt.^PP TPOmN OPP q ONfOONTTOO gOOa PagO ONO..aM <00 P P N T N N 1•NN 1•TnmTF 1• TAT NNNN h T NM1I• S N a f M v T Zj0 jLL0 i0y oHW nJ0 E ui ir: •j~ f • ¢• O;i: ~. ~ W• <~ 1 • • • • ~ ~ •i~ •t• It• •Z • W OPOnV000.rOnNnn npryP O ONP.p APON..N Pn N,p OOnNnaNNeNN~m•mNaNNm•rVNP a~OPnV OmV .r rr .. NNAN •P a n Nm N Nn n NVn ~•OP n0 n ~ aN a JNO OPmr.Nm^NAm^m±..1 NIr1a N<nmPO.•NIr1a NOnmNOwNnaNV~aPe.rN WNn Nn N aFFFan~a^'~'MnFN N aaWa<WNO ann nennnnnnnnnnnnn n ni-nnNwnnnnnnnnnn OnnnnnFnnnNnnnrO•n~nnnnnnnnnnnnnFNnwnnnnwnnnnnnnnnnnnn . m mm • m <m i •m m i N [ O u . a <. ° n n ° n om eam m a i c .Ni ° i n ,W w y ono via nuNii J m N N O w . Pi ¢ m VPi HOJ C i •mi J!P N ~ V r JPr v1Z • V W rrr [ .• Sw ¢ rUi •Yi V < Y W .Vi i rUi uii Y •Vi wVl M < w 6 j [ ¢ ~ n 1v 1 J iQ O>rJ V TP J [ VF JJJ ~W W avwC n OJVO N S T6 I~w W W W W V J. V N. N[ W r.. OO[ w f J V r 1 N m w„Y lnN r =•r \r•ZVN j ~..N ~N yVW NN I.I°WN6 J .n J°1EwNV e J J.:'Jw 1 I J\Ji O00 .Ip 6w° [OS J \z s N =LLILL! ao ooa No~Jf! COYLLWi< N ° .i w•r M .2 v! W.rINJN ry Onn.w NaHOm OOw • O:FNZN1100<NW¢N.POmWwNeYVVLLU ~w ¢V W .- 6 1.> LLooo~^N [Ju 1 z z N y O .u FzF.r .OP uY Y N\„ x m\YO~ Wo¢N WLLWWZnW ~~ s Y¢ J rnYW. zamw .".~ Jed ii.Ww~iNwuoY ~y~..WZN<uwJZZZ „LLW zip °oYs MOjvFJJ Zi¢2 N [ •iWVLWWW v O •~ O ^ . VP[ < f OYw>l W• v'O J Y=='N ONw<w6 NSOpY ° nVw OnNJWrrW Ni<V 606..N[<W JVVO..t°pH0<l¢n wOn wi ~OwNM\N 06YU>NFO °JW„! WOW i~w<[°° 2° rWO.WVVW¢ Y J71 Jr.j Oj6¢¢O yWr YmvO JW vi mY. rJ JNV•'•'FOnOW NOVrrO jr•WyiN°N wW~JW SY J[OJ°WwWFIFW~J [ON¢VY OJ OWP Wiw=W >OC N OVWJ>> V w> 2y OSONww~) •. n4[NSNV6 ON> O SLL OV1wVOOVO SaiiN000JOQOZtU¢Y OUmN V ;~ " „ ¢ s V J M V j J O UY ~Yw W J f V LLY J_ 76 m.N '¢ n °s iW . o LLi ~¢ Z N W:t F LL ~ O l _ L_ O¢ OLL OYyw VnOF¢. j FV f NW IN °U Nf ,~JJ V. O iN J fn N ~ S~V ANN w [O~rOiOmVY O_J IV_N_ l~ ¢Of 2 SUjm>°NO Nj0 F f.r= y°¢¢.~ YV O° <pZ NIIOJWij >O JW i VJ .. VO i°V O OOin rUFiiN O°m<~VLLN VCNVVUn •V i .Ji3 ~J ¢w.Ji °i~Wim O LLjFO~wJFYYLL:WYYOY <WWj ONin¢Vif7 nu0?> SVVm W Y Nmff VO °iW Jl re •j rr<f.J.2 m OJOJV 6 Ow jv¢i iOfjZU t:W O ~ N rr:N°WOW •JWOtONN! vLN •VF• Yxt°.Jj OI Nfw f<CZZwpNV Y OjNVNWf J IO FOtLO Fj .OFVf• •jt•YF O VNNpON VlYVni~>nV• L • NL VNY 7Y<NLLNO iOtU JN>OONFjnVO<~/ t. LVN WJwn¢O<vNiivVw _J•.v vW.MJV•rVWFWjfYYiVUVJ •.OVVOfi¢sY _Of •_r 0_On2it<OttWeOV .fim>,O_f_f_i j_7_tVffLOV¢.f¢ WWW WILVVVVV ZZ•rM 777vvJJJtj[Ittt 00°i6°°°vvv Pn nN• 1PNVPNNnNOONnN.rNIN<OaOPNhnaNaOmPNtrr NN mN mje mamPaON.rVti NNNONPPnn nmPP m1~1 NV ~Nwm~O N P OFNNMaNNN OHO N ~a N.nPnV'P Pr. ir1 P PaN JNPP.rPNP PPPI.IPP nY NI~1N~m Y • .. _V iNw ri U61 =~0 LL O o.N.c J .E E E.:i N;i• ~. ~i i zi i v• i~z~ .i iii i i i •Z f• >1 • O i ~w~ ~f~ •«• i i • ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lt ••~ •21 •01 t2 • W •>• ~o~o h<U NNOan ~•OON~NOOP NPn NONPYmO °e a.ln oYN n moo.-.Pe..Nn•eWPpPPnPNan.weJ e wnn~O1n °'$~ e oooeeeeeoeoooooeo V . V w • iN°n°a .+ie -IZ wn ew.•. ~O oi~.. M LL NWVV JJ WiW i VPU >J• iVNNW JsJ J7i OM JYJfYnVhIL ILLL e N~ ve i ..: W : 2wi.WVWO2zw Wi !w uUiZiW Snz~NiiN pJwOWW.iY WJWJJJJNWWS ca >o os o°i-av>a)N NV O PM • =0 J ) tV i H NLLVu u ~avy iUi •w0 ~ ~. S O[V NF )~F ~\LVIL6W W~WeW2Gf Ji •nn •et7i0 sSiw .NV O•l iVWV o°u N.°.oi.WLL •LY6SN60.OJ yVLWw ___J_ YU)OJ P •WYYO • ••W iiiR S'N NNNNN 1\ \\. . W 1 N J o n ~ n i i v a N a N ~ v o.Ni \ Ow i ~ ~ v '° • u ~1N V t P O„W)a \ i. ZN O OFVWO JOB n YJWt i ~J ` 02Nf\ F~\ fJJ \J OY\.P W NJPJ zzw.. OOrYW>JPJrV\ OiWIWY~00WJN YiisVJY !JJ ow~r°.izH•N~vu V.>JWwN\MWOW NWV)rNen.i z..z r J N NV ~. ~ r tY VF= W IJ W•J iY 1 M N OY ZOV \ •• ROJiJ fw 1.0 •N ~f WFi of WWZN N~.W>V \• IWVJWN oV Ws: uo ~iw. roue ..a • Wt2~N)PNOi VJi00J.NN1~iw N„NFJI•WWrWw ~Jili2Yw PPPn^PNnOPn Nes O.. ~PAN NCYw1. YnPwOM MO.MwPNN^mNn COPYe...r+...a-.w...w.wr .......W.~......_._.. .. __ AYRKAfIpN FW LL[gplfC !lV9A0! fK BMFIl) 1. IYPE(SI OE N<ENSE(51 HlF NO, --_ To: pporimenr d AI«Mdk &rwe e Conrad p IPoI boedwey PECEIPi NO, Spnanmrdo Cdil 93518 ~~ I ' , . ..<.m..w«'.. •~• ^'•~ ~ ' . GfOGlAPHICAL IM und«yved Aeeb e li / 1 ~ ~• ~•<~ COM ~ - Y pp ro w Inm« d~NribM e. iwle.c O`de luued Z. NAMF(5) Oi A)PEIfANi(SI temp. PermH ,.~.I, .~~ AppSw md„s«.lau p Ffle<!.. OON: EflMire 0.re. _rrol. Sr.ir~ce, 1. iYPE(51 Oi TNANSACTON(5) PEE TYR TGKt:YAYA [0 1 ~ Annual Fie .JR nl J'! A. som. el aada.., Clry OF NAAIGNG CIIGAMONGA a"" m, 5. Lxoloa of 5mmea_NvmMr eM Snem --'- Ciry e1M ZiP Code Cmnry q 5 9 10 11 ]2 1219 0 S 6 S SAO. type OI Eta ~ t lm - t ! /~ An vremir.r IariM Gh Eimint ru: 5. MelieO Addreu fl dilknm ham S)-Numbs eM Arew '~ r~l 9 Hare you era bern wa.i<M of a bbnyi _ 10 Hme You ~ obM any of Me pe.irlOar el Me rAkoAdie Y F<rero9e Cpnl.d Ae1 a rpubliom of Ma 0.po<rment~. ___~', yl t 1 A °, raiamR ro Me Anr I J I I. f.plvin a'TES" om.« b ixmr 9 er 10 on on enxbmwr .M1:<A rboll b• deemed pen al Mir appbmrioa. 11. Appllmm e9re« (nl rlml eny ma.eper emploY<d fa n~wla Lunwd pa...iw< .ill Fora II he queLS<eGOnr of liomw, and (bl rAar M .ill nar rioleN or mvre w p«mN ro M rielend Dray of Me preddear al Me AkoAdie br«ey. Cmrrol A<t. ------ I]. SiAIE Of CAIIfOPNIA Cou.ry el --~+<; ^~. r'_^___ _ _ _____ ___ _ ___ 'I-~. ...CaN-:..-.--..- s - m .r/...~i ~~gYne • rm a i....r... f n.. n. .....:n .wr..i....~, a -nun.' n<.~~Y. M .~i~.-. ~ .Y ..rr. ~. -.n .. ....1 ~..a i.e4r.r rv 11 APPIICANi SIGN HEPf .-......-1.--......[<~-- -.____-.--.-. ..... __ ............................ . ~. 1 ~ Y• : ; r.., r~..~l I...•--____. -.-....--..-.- A--4CATION !t TIIANSF[11011 $ I5. Si4F OE UIIPORNIA Cwnh ol-------------------------------__-_0.re__-..-...-----....-..----. ~DeN%. « w e..-. e...... x. .memo ..w. n...... _rn ......e.•., ~.wnn. r +. O.<-e.... 16 Nomebl al li<e<(rl__,_________,. 'q Synol_relrl of Li«nue(d__. IS. lireme Number(q IR, lrHepon Number oM sneer Gh nad Tp Code Counh On Nnf Wdm 9alnm TAie Liv; Yw D<Fmnmem Ilw FArlq AtNebw (~ R«e:ded acritt, 11 Fidu<ivry pepen, (? _ ............... ........ - CORIES MAlIEO ~-.J n bneweAlsel.----..,-.Fddd ....-..__.._ ..---OMO Cn--- .............M<6p Ne g ~----- z : : ,, ~: ., t^ O ve m om 6 ~ Q W V J ~ n O 6 m ? r J O (Sif ~+q ~ 2 V N H ~ O U s~~.-o ~ x NOV ~ I <m¢ vim u ~._~ ~ ~,~ 3nrranv vwowva w c~ 6 J J Q (J Z O_ K U_ U 0 2 U Z G K C L a+ 3 N W a a R o K ~ A ~ M Q y a a w J V U O 4- 4- m C o U J ro w v J O 0. a V1 N _ F- V O O W LL U Y Y 11 O O 6 vt O LL O 4 N U1 L t Y N Y W W 0 0 0 m o i- LL M t`1 U L N N itl at w v Y m b U O w m to N T~h •'- h+ Y ~ b V L C 01 r N n N w W C W W 'O U ~ L O i! r- EE O L w w Ea L d ~N a ~ v o 0 ~~ TJ N c o v m m W J LL' O U \ V V v ~o E E L L c ~ Q ~ O FF E N O 41 N O O T '~ £ £ U V 0 Y C C1 W L Y Y ~! L C L J VI O O O O N N U N Z VI W 3 T r4 ,~ v N N N COPYa_..~...x~~x~x ..Nx»N».hm,rEkfr~-..rnxrr..rrxear.wE :fM/CA910N IOE YCOIgEIC YVY110N IKfNY(f) 1, iY9[yS) Of NCFNSE!3) RlE Np. ie: Depwnnml 01 Akohdk 6rwraq Cenhd 1901 8+^^d'ra/ 5 .i :^ r-r 'i' P t• RECE19] NO ~ . i «rxmrm, CaA1. 93918 ,.....m. xxxr.x.e.a T ~ , Fi,TTD a,\n' GEOGRAINICA4 CppE SP M u^d«+gned MnbY OppIN+Iw Ira.a». d.»nbrd or lolbnu De» -- luurd }. NAME(31 OF ARIICAM(31 Lmp. 9rrmb "':'SDFC~ rY+rCto^. R ~ICYi+ Applied uMn S«.]b4 ~ E11erN» Dmr: I'"I"\^M Eflxnx Dws: PA"i T", FL'.rirp-r ::, 5 r}rrr.j•i }, fYiF($) Of iWNSACTONISI fEf lK. ]Y1E si.....' '.t Cf: ?~ I. Nemr ar e.um.. 'Tftt'Ir'S F`CI'!•!IRarC NECE~E 3, t«oriaa al eec^x+-Nanbn aM sk.n CRY CAEPN --- ,;°I r,. r:~!r,.l I n~,..,, r::u- ^ SEP081992 Ic~7 cold LR_Cad. q(.,,1 ^.:o i~..a'1'n ] 8 9 10 ll 1Z 1 } 3 / 4 l 3 `'i.i.rvl _ ]. An Ram»+InsHr SMm }ypr of Garn» ' ' CM lrmnl T°^ 9. Maibrq Addmf fl dMerem bom SI-Nxnbv. and Sne~l ,p nm.l :N'l: 9. Han You nm been rm.idM d a IebnYi 10. Harv yw r.a r:eb»d eny el the «or:4mf of IAr AlrehelK er».a9e emnol Arl « rR9alenon. er mr o-peHmrm «r inLq rc Mr A<O I L Eeplafn a "TES" enwe. ro i»m+ 9 0. 10 on an an«hmmr xNrb +M1all be domed purl W IN+ oppemeon. IZ, b~IhmnM~ill mlo.rlhve on} menaper empleYVd is oa.»le Ike »d pemhm .ill M1w ell the 9vel:fimnem el a Sremee, and ___-_ _ r pnm robe r1Wa»d any of IM qar el IFe Aleehdi< Nrere9e Con rel A.I r ~. r r w oau» a n rxem e 1] SLA}f Of CANFOIINIA Coun 1 __ ^_I_v__n_re1 rM• ^~]e~^? ry o ... .. ................. .Dare............ ........ M. ~,~ Ir A9pLICANi r f w.ra ,.. w ne. er . rn ......:.... ., n. r...... .,u .e ..rv . r .ev.. r. SIGN Hfpf ._.. ._. _..... -, ~-VIICpTION t7 TR~NSEEROk I5. SiAiF Oi UIIfOPNIA Cwnh ol .................................... ~»...................._....._ r N w Mrwr + r.+W. eetl.re Id. Nemap) a( ba wee(+I n w .n+'n i+~:~r. r. e• ow.. V• ]pna nl+l of lln nN0 19. lice » Nrmberl+) IE L«ado Nvmbx and Shan __. ____ Ciry and I'rp Code __ _ - i Dn Nnl Wdre Nr/ma tAL Giv: Fo. DrMrlmrnl U» Ordy --_ ~ _ M»rhed~ ^ 9ecorded name, i ~~ h rie„dery wwn. '~ ....., ~l e.«.el: fm A..........lme a ................ _. ...._-Ofl`r m.........- ~-... R«dq No, -_--------_.-- ~~ ~~ 1 ' _ ~l. ' ~5 r ~- 1 ~~ r •~ . ' n ~ ORTEGA'S RE51"AURANT 7201 r1RCHIBAL D, SUITE r,'Il RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 A business wi thin the Sycamore Plaza Center m S G MI IW 1~ r `~1 { ;I ~~ ~ N ~.a- ._ .._.. BASE LINE ROAD Property Currently Zmied: Neiq hborhood Commercial Znninq of Adjacent Properties: North: Medium-High Residential Snu Lh: Neiyhbn rhood Conmre rc ial East: Low-Medium Residential West: Neighborhood foimnercial saase. 09/15/92 _tuNr. ~..... e.r....... .r.r.N~.r ...-w~ -- AVON IOII I1l[ONOIIC [EV114Ot lICM3llf1 I. 1v Ff151 OI IICENSEI51 < •~•n omrr v.rl 111E ter dperrm.nr el Alcnhdk Mrerapl Cenkd NO IPoI Rreed.oy ~ _ pE<flpl NO So[rwnrnly. CVk1. OSE18 Pl:a'JII•E OX sN,c CFPpnAL cAl'tltG L ~<.....r.. [e<.ne.r OEOGRWAfI6CAl - Ibr endrrr%peed AUrbv vppba iw ILACC <OOE ]61E ~ Conn d.rcr;b•dmten<rvu Doia -- -~ E IIA hwed MFC) O! AFNICANIIS) Lmp. FnmP YRCIIREL Jre COIFE[ GI:CFfi IIK Applied rmd•r 5•c tbll ~ r . Epn • Om tneee_ Fnern.e Ome: Fre^-fOL4EY. IlflXael 1. tYFNS) Oi tpANSACYION(51 FEF IY Ppci it•~/PecYEULLty. J. R. J -~- __ IYFE SiCr,[ TeE. (mac. )d6 il.l) 3160. p6 /) CT ]p FECEIYEO A Nem. ei s•a~.r.- ~ItY OF~pNO.:ppANpNCA _n1_AmJI'.n_imlJmm~nca-_ - CIEY CIENN - _ - - s. le<mien nE a^6nmr-Nvmbrr ene sG.:i - AOG 2 4 199--- - - 1013) FTllrlll PI<rl. - ~ ____ _ _ i •_-----. ~?~8 9110 11111 113U/5 6 C M1 end iip COde Ceun - -- FNECrIO PN:NX.WLR (it]p - f,.1.r CIT nLI'I:.O d II vremivr Eirm<M. - -. -- IOGE 1100.00 Sherv lYpe ^I li«n_ - ~ ~ ~ ~~ Are r.emi[.r Inud< Yl:: _ ________ClrY limiip p MnNinO Addrev 1:1 di0e em Inm 51-Number nM Sveal ---'----- ~!p e._~Enu..ac_. PeE...e._us trei__I r....r p. Ilar<YOU ever bean [anri[rad of v /elanY) r0 rlar< yW ever ri^lahd vny al M< pv.irlenr e1 rbe AI<ebnli< Re.voOe CvnPel A<t w repubnom 01 rFe Deperrmem qr~ _,___ ,______ rvi„inR rv Me A<rl I I f.plvin o "Yf5" vmner rv xemr 0 yr 10 en en vnechmem rvF'mF Aall be deemed purr el rM vppfmxen 1] App4eo.r a^•e<[ ;vl IMI onY m no0ar employ d in omr f< fr< [<d nre v'rll b • eA rAe pvellMm.am ere P eroK and Ibl Fv Fa ill n .ivla __ ^r p<rmn m be riolaied enY el rF. pv. el the Nmh00< k.erape Cen rel An. _ emm r Il StAlf OI CAlI10RNIA C^unq al __il_l_'E_.IL6_I__V_E___ __ ___ _ __________6_/__]0/9] ...-.-.... ..Lbl< ............. 1<rAppllCANtr f1ICIlAEL .IrJ <OFEI:E E.IIf:1i. IrrC.l SIGN HFRE . . ............. .... ....... ........... ._ - - ...auc . , ..-- -PYr ..... ... APPII[ATION 0Y TRAN[[[ROR ri51'~N~I Is 5iA1F bt-EAIIropNlA Gaenry nl........1dup.1„Ap4 .................. D.rr...__..-^U.4(:1__.... 16=_nmePl ^I U< mr• __ m e41 ^I 4< , rr . .. _. _r<LI,-• _'-r ,n.'••_•e•o•~p Siynn r <_e<bl.-__.___-__ 18 1_<mu Nvbr.lrl NrC11Ai.L .>'R COFILF. :i!'r ln, I':" ... .. .._. .. _ - LY -.. .. __ __ _____ ___ _____ Illcl:n•I tn•Iryr pr•.ydrnr ~ -~ iv t^•minn ~ ~ 1^ipemb<i one srre•r-.'~----_ .'-_=._._~_~ __-. -_`_ .__- r' rl, .r„ Vvnp^,. Orz and lin CMr Cw•q _ .In. .~.A (161 ^It.lr ;n.l pl r.iN l.lb9 DnA'nl WNlr flrlmr TAir Linr; h'nr Orpnrtmrnl l%.r Ordy - ----- r a AIA.<Aedr. IipRrm.dM nnu<r. I 1 I%d~ann pnpmr. ll .-_ ...- _..... __ . .... COFIfS MA6fD . ...... p/)0/9] rl bnrw^h lrs oL... -... laid al.. ... _----._OAi<s en ................. M<el ll/e .........._ P l i l il. 1 lyyr' 1,2[R.ar~l' 1 ~~ n rrn D 2 4 5 w J_ O m J .J. 0 v LL 0 M n G .+ COl ~ Q K J U 60 ^ H m C N L W J 2 K J O ~+£ N S Q - F- U •70~ O U J LL W O 6 m S 2 N U tJ .y 2 .. o a~~ 30N 3Atl VSOiJN 3H t`t M L b A C O W N M ~- O L C L C G LL N rJ N N N ~O V N G 6 O 6 L p M ~ ~ ~ ~F V U . U V- C C •r• C •~ ~ •r- O Y- q •~ 4- .~ V- Vf V- \ O ~- N n N ~ U r- V C V mM av my •~v u Y ~ n . p n U N•~ L UTA UN NVI L yV- N i L U N L •~ p W ~ r W r- E N V O A k r- E ~ p p U O UIn VI Y C Y \Y ~ v o o T o T m N 4~LL ~ '+LL. ~LL a U N U Ul R) C N U1 C N L d C ~ L 6' ~ L W L O ~ E V N E N N Q E 3 ~ C U O O O O T Y- J L~ L J O Y C O~ r v c c L y }J Y 4+ i C L y V~ Vi U Z O O W N 3 J3 N rn N N rn 0 d s-a ..J "r~ l, _ e..I Jn..e-e.r... na•M•• . wN.rnu e` r ryFCq • ,n14~h11 AMIKAOON fOR ALCONOIIC t1Y1tA01 OCIN]tlfl I. lYRF15) OI UCENTf(Tl pILF NO ~) /,. ]e ol ALeFdla bvoape Cenrvel ~ p I9 ~ IM I boad. Sauamnle, Cdi1. 93819 _ All9o uri MLL l'1II111A EC[ 1 NO, ~] bNi ~°rv. v,^•"`.°"' L fJi2lIG FLAC6 CFOGPACN!UI ' / ~), CODE ]~1• Y / Ib undn.ipnM A«.by epnlbl ler Iken.n dnnibedmEOpe." __--- r 1 Del. hao<d~ u F/V/ t/qq I{ /r~{~Q • t ~~IRi __ ] NAMf(SI Of ApftICANt 5 y ~~ temp. Parmir IW~ I 1 1 Kda - FAlvgll pr52Al'rJxi.^., tUC. Appped vnde. 5e<.1b11 Q ~ l~r ~ 31st: ZL1lIIWIIS._1om L~_ 4fl«p.e om., iepwn_ fpafi.e oaic r'I,~~ V.Pr..-IhruWAB• Yertin fiM1Lt i66UWA5...F.arie __ ] 11pf151 Of 1PANSACIIONI31 ffE ~ __ IIC .... 2[f\e-CIIAVZZr Ilailn p. b20GF.lluWGCSr ;3'1VCJI5._0In{y____„__ •IMULN. Vrl. \ Ibltll ___rxAV_tZ, _N_Yoet___ xAl+orvAS, arena. A. CZ Zp _ riems ei e~,;~« x~NUei_e I:axl_ req(pyre~e __ __ s leaerven of eo„n•.r-N.mbe, and sr,en 1965 VWq+rd A.a., p) cry m~a rp cee. ~ co~~n wlcny Cu[uloepA 9IrJO __- _liui P6~rt. d, II hrmim flanr.d,. TMv IYp• el Uaen_ JI-Z56a31 !. Malllnv Addren fl d~flo<nl Irem 3) Number oM Sueel 6N1F _ _ __ __ _____ 9, Ne.e Yen a er bem <emiOed el a lelonrl CL. T iY. CITY !!LL.P!LI?I1~f6 y'dl.- ~DUL If--1-- ]. Are Yre wrlmide Ob UmbA TC6 r r..l __- fL<l _ Nme You r .lelv~ed enr of IFa prev'nlom el de Almbn4< • r n te. ro9< Cen .nl An « n9ulmrom of Me Depemm• I pr. _ rN•iny re Me A<I] I I Fplain o "YES" a.avu le ilrma 9 or ID on on enxFmem .MaF aba'1 6e de<n•d potl of lbil vppliwnon I] A plan^' r lel M any m mplepd i e .vle Lv vd Mrm ..ill bvv ell h• gooLLml m el a li<. a o.d __ Ibl IM1Vr Fe w_II•n _iolo__ _._ _-_ r•per _ v be .IaIJM1d a _ol Ibr pae _ _.ol rM1_AI<ebella p<v mpe Cvn rel A_I _ _ r rvona e I 1.1 Sinlf OE CAIIfOPNIA Cv h 1 1_IVF.FCIUC _________ __ Oele ... ... ~/tl/]: •e ...... ............._ ., n.-n.,.. rn .... ,.. u..n...er,.a,... _.. a _....._- ...n.. ,r....ru..... a. ur..,.. _,n ......,a.r xan.,... II aAPI'IIUNi VAln1Ft1 LFGTAIIFAUT6. IIIL'. SIGH ^FFE ...... . ... ........... _ _ IWA~.ttL~rlill)rlr'_}_.'i._T.~[SG~.'. ~-C,CILL .. _____ ~_~._ _-_. _ _ ___..• _._ APPIICAEION LY iRANSEEROR IS SIgF Of Upf OPNIA <rnnry ol.. P1YG'b IVE........... II/Il/•I] ......... Dole........_. _.__. __. _... 16 Nam.ln Jf U<rmabl, .• •••• • w ... ,.. n.m• v. 5',9.m.,igr1 0l nom•e0t IA Urine Nombrdrl ]Illl`Lln]r Or^nrrJ A. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ II ZiNPFJAG, Ilnrln 2LIII'i.l /.Or teal 'i CIaLIARr Mutla ' m.e:u:.lw. ntnt n. _ 19, locmion ~IfVmber o.d Snob ....___Gry and /.p Gd. _-_-____f[onnr]__-____-_ iv13 VI\nynn'. mF., I'), Ir, r.r,. "i.y,. m,l (Irl "N:U ",irl l"1•~pir n" _. _ I)n Nnl 11'ritr Rrlmr Tht] Lfnr; Inr I/rpnnmrm Ilo Ouly dmaF.d I flannrd.d nnlio. To ea:d oN I I IidudorY PnRe't n/I) ~I) non/ I1 . ....... ...... ... ........ ...,.,_<ORIFS MAIIFO ..:. ., D.1Y,96.]L...... .... ... _..... ra I<: 'li7h;, ~/big~~N pkC. ~4 j~ t II Ilrn•wnl lre el .. .... Joid ol . .... . .......... ..._ OT<e m.... .. ....... Ieulpl Nn .__ .... -_ / ~ Hour `~~i~Il~nruinTfrl - rlr:n I a / ~ 1 ~ ~ . ..I - ~ 1 i -~" t. ~ - mpm ...I _ -i . 7 ~ ~ I~~ 9 f = I .. I - ~~ -- L~ _ s.y ~ c ~ _ _ _ I .Fa_ r. ~ .`~G4 :_r ~ 1 ;~ J ~ II ~ • ~ 1 ~ ~~~ ~ '•X ~1.+. .. ~ ~ ai'.r tl n . L ryu ~ ~ I o' , ~ ~ . 'I I • I 7t ~ I I T.' . ~ ~ __ ... O I I I I FO G_ -.- .~ ~~I~~t~~ ~~~ M I~~~-0 III~II_i1111f1J1111~ n ~.~w.. - ~"ail..:::'.__ _ . __ __. _. + e w . __ __.~_ 3 ,.. +r. . --. _. ~ VINEYARD AVENUE Zendejas Mexican Restaurant 7945 Vineyard Avenue, Suite D-7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A business within the Thomas Winery Plaza Currently Zoned: Special Comaercial, Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plan Zoninq of Adjacent Properties: North: Office Professional, Lnw/Low Medium Residential South: Community Corntercial, Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plan East: Community Commerrial, Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plan West: Cormunity Conrtnercial, Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plan IS 5 Q 3 W O m J rJ-i H O sasse 09/14/92 COPYn....rM+.r....lr w.• awr w.ro. A<... rv.<ir.•x....~.....n~..... NylK11ElON EO\ AICONOI]C NO4AM 1KM3013) I. ryPFlsl Of IICEN3fI51 IIIE fp. /e: Ixpanm.m d Akddk Mr«opr Connd 1901 baad.ay Rivhreld¢ ' V CN WS AF£R S WI4E: -- GfCFIq !q. Sarom«do, Cd A. 95413 ~......m........m..m.~ .. 1T1`Cr P.AFF. GEOGIIApN1Ul COOf 35l> Iha «M«rgnM Ah.by oppY . y: C mar drerib.d «1o39n. ~ 1uu.d 1. NAME(SI OE AIRICAhi15) Irmp. Emir ~,'EF'.:PFF11 L`T<RI.~(. (`C. Appfad uMx Sn. ]qU ~ F11a<Nn fArx: Ineu12< EM<n.a Uu1r: S. TYPf131 Of iRANSAtTlOp151 ifF lK. ',•.:i-cTvn Yuu{ !.~-, ttk. Hl+s. :Ll-~ va $Gt.`LLAr. .ky y 3m,iP 41 ~~~ i-r+i Yarn• 5!k dtldr NvJUpl EEC :US.^J ~T: _'0 L Nem.d Wdmw "4dTr in ,an',ar c Y.zMEJ1{ Srtyfnn C PGeNV[lnG .ITY OF PA-~ ~~A - S. lxhnon 91 Wrln«r-Numbr. a:M Shur 9034 fmvvl .4Ye. ~9 C1ry oM Lp Coda Cw:ry ~A"AS3 F1AA7S`SWYl'Jh 91'AJ 3.'Sn (tr. SrLLlro ~ PI09101111S 112J14 516LoTAl 3 /15.00 _.. _ m: r. An n.mi...InOw I wl 0..1 9. Nara ]ou n« b.an <an.ierM d n IabnYl ro. Nora you a.a• .ldoxd wry d M pv.idrm of M Akddk A~ I 3ameyr Conrad M a •a3ulanam o1 Ma OaPmmxnl pw~ 11. faploin 9 "Yf3" anr.•• w :lamr 0 « :0 9. on 9nxhmaM .hich rhdl ba d.amad ppn d d%r opplica3an. r], Appli<enl ep.« (al rhol p:ry mor:apar amplelyd in omwla lyanxd pami«r ++11 Aan all M. gp!iA<orima el a R<anw, «:d (bl IM ha .ill n« riolax w <aw « P«ada ro b. rideM o^Y al Ihr wanumn d rha Akel:e3< MmeOa fennel A<I. u, s]wTE of c4ufo3wA cwnry d ._.._91versidt..____..__._____oex _....._3/ahl._.._.._... M1 M snFn ~+. h sMr... . .» :.' r.~..,R ~ruw.n~..r n.~ :~w< M~ M ~..m. +rr ^a~ •. M1 :.: _ ti~w1.nM n w:N~ M ~....r n n n•:~rv~a uM Mir .n w. 0.. x.~n: .. n n..~.a ..Iyw• r M ~r ~ .YIY r. A +~ .:. ~ :n. .r . w u.M . ~.m ti eM:. I Ml.ni<In M ~.. r...rl.r m:n.r.~ ~, Y ~~0/~.. 1r ~ M1 .nx:.~ ..~. 4~w• ~~. .. mA~1 ~..YtM1 . M N..i~. 11. ApftICANI , }. SIGN NfRf 9Yd._ ..~SL:1._'______________ ______________ _________________________________ _________.. ...............fQ.D]eaTU3¢n ].+~..L 1«.i+rc._. _.._.__..__,._.__.__................___.___._.. _........ ' On Nnf W dfe Ndore iA4 Llne; Fm Orp9rfinenf Ur ONy Mlo<had: CJ A<«ded mlka. i p NeeN«y PePn<, .................... . 9/4 9d .__ ................._CO11l3 MAIIFO ..___................._.__.__.__._..... er.u~ n Ra.rwFFn d... ... Ee1dM ... .. .._ -_ aRO en._.. __. ... Enlpl Ne. ...................... A~~IICATION 0Y 71EANfRIIOR IS. STATE OE CAL1fORN1A Cnn1Y d___....._ ..... ...................... Dex __.__...._____....._........ =.T...1 a +..rN: ~W w.~.~~ -•1....., . .ww Y.M . M rrtr. w nr.l~., ~n .n M uw:L ~sM.+i.n ... w .iM... \r .gyn. nr O M 7_ ti W U 6 4 G > F- U 2 eC G N ^ K 3 fJ Z ~ C C w ¢ N c Q W G m U' K C U l = Z w U N N K W Z O G z t a C v U ¢ o a S'~OK U 0 8 T Y N N.r- 1~ U L C U ~ T Y ~' L 10 4- 2' E EN N'~-r~ C E C..- E N q Y W ^ V ^ Y o a' a n> .-o U O N O T 9 0 O vl ~ N r li L A ~ C V C U r0 Q ~p N L C L y ¢ 1i (p L d U Y ~~ > y A N .C ~ N O L L L q ^~ EE Y N X C L N ~OY$ E6 E C a N L N N d ^~ C N O O ~F A ~ m 1" Y .- U' 6_ p N U N U O ~- U C E C V ~E CY TN TM~ L UO 9 U r- L C U ~} r q Y N m N N N'~•~ C G W W b W C L L L J A EEJ L •~ J R ~(1 } N N Q C 'O Y N N ~ L E S N lL 1'f N N O N~~ ~ •~ O N O J O. J n N ^ W U' 02U UF- UV1N N A O C " V T C C v .. .. O N C C L J Gf L Y Y Y Y p Y L C L J ~ J o 0 o v y 4> U N Z N w 3 p U p~ v ¢ ti Cyj U ~ ~ o W ~ N .~ W _ Q I~ ¢~ ~$~ Z a V ~~^ > o~ ^ ; x o ¢ m •~ ¢d ~ ~ ~^ - ,~ 3 ~ ,~ a~ W I ~l I 1 ~ I 0 SPIRES G.T.E. 10380 10428 'FOOTHILL BLVD~/.) 1 w z d 0 4 ~~J O"7 ~ r+l fJ o ~~ ~~ ~a. m o~~ _~, ~ £~~ VINGINIA OPPE 1 0470 ^ 1 ~ • • _~ Z W W (Z¢J 2 U h 8 X U W (z `V 14 N T 0 N N N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAk'F REPORT DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1992 T0: MAYOR AND MHMBERS CF THE CITY COUNCIL JACK LAM, CITY MANAGER A.I.0.P. FROM: BRUCE ZEINSR, CHIEP OF POLICE SUBJECT: ASSET SHIZURE ERPENDITURE .rO ~ucAMO'~c 9 ~. i ~ I r } '9 F Z U` _~> ivn I The City of Rancho Cucamonga, as of this date, has approximately $150,000.00 in Its law enforcement asset seizure account. These funds are a result of legal proceedings against assets of narcotics offenders. Health and Safety Code 11489 describes use of these funds and places only two limits on how they can be spent: 1. They must be used "exclusively to support the law enforcement...efforts of those agencies". 2. The money "shall not supplant any state or local Funds that would [otherwise] be made available" to the agency. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department would like to purchase the following items utilizing funds from the Asset Seizure Account. As per Section 11489 of the Health and Safety Code, these items will be used exclusively to support the law enforcement efforts of the department. These expenditures are not supplanting any city funds that would otherwise be made available. MICROCASSSTTH RECORDHRS WITH BELT HOLSTHRS Seventy Ftve (75) "Panasonic", micro cassette recorders (or equivalent) @ 535.00 ea .. ............................. 52625.00 Seventy :ive (75) "Bacon", Leather recorder holsters (or equivalent) @ 913.00 ea .. .. ........................... $1833.64 Three Hundred (300) microcassette tapes @ $1.66 ea.,... $ 498.00 150 rechargeable AA batteries @ S2.37 ea .. ............ g 355.50 Sub Total..... $5312.14 Tax....... S 411.69 Total..... $5723.83 ASSET_SEIZURE EXPENDITURES PAGE 2 _____________________ OSES OP RECORDERS 1, The recorders can be used in both investigations and patrol settings, for recording of suspects, victims and complaints, 2. The documentation of an emergency operation or confrontational setting during a arrest or citizen contact. 3. The tapes can 6e used by supervisors and officers to evaluate and document their contact with the public. JUSTIPICATION 1. The use of a micro recorder during investigatfona end Interviews will allow the officer io obtain recorded statements from victims and witnesses. Recordings of suspects will provide irrefutable evidence that can be used in court during prosecution. 2. The uses of recorders during in-field police cuntacta such as traffic stops or calla for service can be used by supervisors and officers to: a.) Evaluate how an officer handled a particular problem and provide direction in improving the officers demeanor and technique. b.) Review an Incident involving Citizen complaints of officers behavior. These recordings have proved Invaluable Sn the past to disprove frivolous or untruthful complaints. c.) The use of recorded evidence can be used. to comhat possible civil litigation against the City, County and employees. CITY OF RANCxIO CUCAMONGA ~"-~ STAFF REPORT ~_ DATE; October 7, 1992Q T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council -Y.:.I.J Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FRCM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 8Y: Bob Zetterberg, Public Works Maintenance Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST TO APPROVE APPROPRIATIONS FROM FUND 07 "REIMBURSEMENT/CALTRANS" IN THE AMOUNT OF E22,210 FOR FISCAL YEAR 92/93 TO COYER ANTICIPATED CONTRACT SERVICES FOR QUALIFYING RE Ih16U RSEABLE EXPENDIN RES FROM ACCOUNT N0. 07-4647-6028 RECOMI~NOATION It is recommended that Council approve the special appropriations for fiscal year 92/93 in the amount of E22,210 from Fund 07 - "Reimbursement/Cal trans". BACKGRWND/ANALYSIS Each year on a quarterly basis the City files claims with Cal trans for work performed by the City (or its contractor) for the maintenance of Route 30 and Route 66. This in accordance with the terms of a Maintenance Agreement between the City and Cal trans. This maintenance work Includes such tasks as street sweeping, stripping, traffic signing, tree trimming, weed and debris control and street repairs of asphalt and concrete. For FY 92/93 no money was budgeted to handle contract services for some of the above specified work that will be performed by the City's contractor. An appropriation is needed to provide an avenue for which to pdy the City's contractor. Revenue received to cover the expenditures wilt be from the Maintenance Agreement between the City and Cal trans. In past years these payments have been recorded as a reduction to revenue as opposed to an increase in expenditures. This was done because of the special nature of the fund-where revenue Ts from reimbursements from Cal trans for work performed. Policy now is to treat this fund as other funds and appropriate the money necessary to cover contractual ob119ations. Respectfully submi d, ~i / William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BZ:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -~ FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, Lity Engineer 6Y: John L. Martin, Associate Engineer STAFF REPORT r GATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO RELEASE EXCESS FUNDS FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FROM TRUST ACCOUNT N0. 70-276-500 FOR PARCEL MAP 1183A, LOCAiEO ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND VICTORIA PARK LANE, REQUESTED BY HUGHES INVESTMENTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council consider the amount of 59,026.00 as "excess" and approve the release of the funds from Trust Account No_ 70-276-500 to Hughes Investments through Minute Action- BACKOROUND/ANALYSIS Hughes Investments deposited 584,550.00 with the City for use in processing the acquisition of street rights-of-way along Base Line Road, west of Yicto ria Park Lane, which was a condition of approval for the development of Parcel Map No. 11838. The Developer, Hughes Investments, requests the refund of 59,028.00, which is the excess funds that were deposited into the Trust Account No. 70-276-500. Respectfully submi(~d, , William J- O'Neil C~ City Engineer WJ O:JLM:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION October 7, 1992 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Oan James, Senior Civil Engineer __~ ~~ APPROVAL OF RELEASE OF A PORTION OF FJNDS DEPOSITED UNDER AGREEMENT CO 90-139 FOR PAYMENT OF SOUTHE RSV PACIFIC RAILWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT ROCHESTER CROSSING, TO THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY It is recoimnended that the City Councll adopt the attached resolution approving the release of a portion of previously deposited funds to The Will tam Lyon Company. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 3 1990, the City Councll approved an agreement with The William Lyon Company. der the agreement The Lyon Company deposited E146 354.00 for improvements to be installed by the Southern Pacific Railroad (SPAR). These improvements include a fully upgraded railroad crossing. With the purchase of the SP RR by Metrolink and the uncertainty of the future use of this portion of tracks the complete improvements are not necessary. The work to be performed by Metrolink and SP RR is substantially less and 15 anticipated to be complete by mid-October. The William Lyon Company may then move in and complete their roadwork including paving between the tracks. WT th the increase work by The Lyon Comppany and the reduced work by SP RR, a request for release of funds was made by The Lyon Company. The attached resolution authorizes release of up Lo E30,000.00 from this fund upon completion of the roadwork. The E30,000.00 is to be released upon review and approval of the City Engineer. Upon completion of all invoicing by SPRR and Metrolink the remaining funds will also be released to The Lyon Company. Respectfully submi d, /~2~~ William J. O'Nei1lJ City Engineer WJO:DJ :dlw Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9~ - a 5~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RELEASE OF A PORTION OF FUNDS DEPOSITED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY WHEREAS, Agreement CO 90-139 approved at the City Council meeting of October 3, 1990, by Resolution 90-382 by and between the City and The William Lyon Company; and WHEREAS, said agreement provided 5146,354.00 for improvements by Southern Pacific Transportation Company; and WHEREAS, said contemplated improvements have been substantially reduced; and WHEREAS, The William Lyon Company is performing improvements within the railroad right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that up to 530,000.00 may be released to The William Lyon Company subject to review and approval of the completion of the improvements by the City Engineer. ,a3 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1997. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, A1CP, City Manager FHOM: Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager SU&7ECf: JUNE EARTHQUAKES, 7992 Council authorize by Resolution the three persons named to represent the City of Rancho Cucamonga in this financial transaction with the State of California. On June 28, 7992, the Yucca Valley experienced a devastating earthquake. Although Rancho Cucamonga escaped serious damage, we did activate our EOC to conduct a damage survey and to mitigate any problems that did occur. Since the Landers earthquake qualified for a Presidential Declaration, the City of Eancho Cucamonga is eligible to receive reimbursement for response costs due to the earthquake. These include staffing for the EOC and emergency response. Every claim submitted must be substantiated with reports and documentaticn. To expedite this process, the state requests Council name by resolution three people authorized to execute on behalf of the City, the application for obtaining this Financial assistance. The persons named to be authorized, Marti Higgins, Jack Lam and Susan Neely are the staff members most involved with this process. Reimbursement should be approximately $10,000. IIespectfully submitted, 9 , Marti Higgins//! Disaster Preparedness Manager MH:vg Attachment r2~~1~.~,~, No ~a- a55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NAMING PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY THE APPLICATION FOR OBTAINING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER P.L. 93-288 INVOLVING THE JUNE, 1992, EARTHQUAKES. WHERFAC, in June, 1992, the City experienced significant earthquakes; and WHEREAS, the City expended funds and resources to respond to the effects of the earthquakes and is desirous of receiving federal and state assistance to recover these costs; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT MARTI HIGGINS, DISASTER PREPAREDNESS MANAGER, OR JACK I,AM, CITY MANAGER, OR SUSAN NEELY, FINANCE OFFICER, is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under P.L. 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act for the earthquakes, which occurred in June of 1992. THAT the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the State OEf ice of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 19 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passes, approves, and aaoptea by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the a-~ CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1992 TO: City Council ~~L~~`Q~1R~~/ FROM: Debra Adams, City Clerk/Records Manager UY"" BY: Tony Russell, Records Clerk ,~ SUBJECT: DESTRUCTION OF CZTY DOCUMENTS It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). COMMUNITY SERVICES ENGINEERING FINANCE Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the city Attorney and City Council. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/tr attachment a5~ I~IUPICN NO. 92-+~- A RESOIUPICN OF 'IlD; CLTt OO[~ICII+ OF 'IIR? CTTY OF RP.NCEiD C[X'I~MiiCA, CAISF~II77A, AU1fYXtIZRT ~ DESIIAICTIQi OF CPPY RHOCimS ATID DOQ?1EM5 F3IICH ARE to ILIiGEFt 1~[JIRFU AS PId1JIDFD UNDER OWHdAII37P OODE SEXRICN 34090 h4~AS, it has been tietermtitred that certain City records order the charge of the followirq City Departmaits are ro lager requirs3 far' public or private purposes: C:Md27PPY S&RVICES IIiGII~tII7G FIlIANCE 4IIfl12FhS, it has been determirYad that destruction of the above- mentioned materials is neoessazy to cat>•;erve stcraga space, and rtadtroe staff time, expenGe, and «nfusian in hatdlitg, and ifficemitg ttte public; and ldiERFTS, Sect10T1 34090 of the GoVUPlrtrtQHtt Code of the State of California atttlwrizes the head of a City department to deslxoy sty City records and donirmnts which ace over two years old order his ar har dtacge, without tatkvy a copy thereof, after the sz®e are ro lamer required, tern the approval of the City Ntmcil by resolution and tha written oona~tt of the City Attarttey; and Ya¢•RFAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said regards as listed in E:diibit "A" attadted hereto and made a part hereof, in stoc-age, wit2aut making a roP~' thereof, whi.dr are over two years old; std SaiQ2FA.s, said ieoar'rls have been apprvveti far destruction bf the City Attorney. NCW, 24~E, this City Cauicil of the City of Razctq Cucamot~cp does hereby resolve as follows: SE7CTi0P1 1: 'IItat approval std auUruization is hereby given to destroy those remrdav described as Edtibit "A" attached ha[ato and made a part hereof. SF)CPICN 2: That the City Clerk u authorized to allow exwinatian by std donation to the Departnoent of Special Nllectiais of the University Research I.ilsary, University of California, ar other histrsical society designated bi the City Oouroil, arty of the regards described in Ddtibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, e~axpt those deemed to to confidential. ,$~^f~_3: 'That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, std thenceforth and theteaftPr the eanre shall be in full force and effect. ~~ ..; TY OF RANraiO CUCAMOXGA Ces[ructior. Noe+titati on Raoort ?ASE: OATF.: 01/06/92 TIME: 12:22:!TC TXE FOLLOXING RFC0305 ARE SCHEDULED FOR DESTRUCTIC!Y. PLEASE IXOICATE THE CES!REO OISPCA!?!ON, S!ON ANO RETURN ?0 ?HE RECOR05 MANAGEMENT OiYISI09. % NE RECORCB L!S?EO OELOM MAY ALL SE DESTROYED. X RE?AIM TMCS.r RECCROS MARXED XITN AN X FOR MOXTXS, OESTAOY THE RES' 9llL TC: 6532 RECCRCS COORDINATOR: SILNANEN. KAREX ^EP? : dE32 CEP? NAME: COMXUNI*Y Se.RVICES MAIL SCAT: PH41E: (itt )989-185! EY.i: 2!C9 MARK CA)ES PERMANENT RECCRD C?R. OESiROY RETRIEVAL BOX (Xl EVEN' SC% CONTESTS BEGINNING ENO!N0 80X N0. LOCAilOH 8aa Ofi-1992 DATE SEN? T0: I D/ R CREA?! ON REFERENCE PAPERS 01/C1/68 11/30/68 632 OS-OZ-C'. 1 06-1992 Fc`der A ~ :NS?RJCTOR PAYMENTS FAL: 1988 O1/C1/BA 12/3C/88 Folder A 1 ACCIDENT REPo.9?S !988 01/01/88 !2/30/88 °o'der A 3 'A0. GRAPEVINE 1988 01/0'./88 12/30/68 Folder a A FALL '.988 GRAPEVINE GETIERRL IMFOfAlATION 03/C',/8A 11!30/88 Folder A E RIME SAF?Y NORNSNOP 9/iT/0B 01/0!/88 12/30/88 Po1de^ A 5 PALL '988 SOfTOALL LEAGUE 01/01/80 12/30/88 F^.?der 9 T SUMMER SOF?BALL !988 01/01/88 12/30/88 Fo'.der A P NEIG!!T TAAININ6 A COVOITIOXING FOR FOOTBALL !988 71/01/68 12/30/88 Fo'.der a 9 CAND CAMP 6/11-9/2/1988 PAT AANOLO 01/01/88 11/30/08 Po?der A !0 LEADERSHIP/SPIRI? CARP ALHS 0/11-15 1988 O1/O1/8B 12!30/00 Fo'.der a !' STRENGTH TRAINING 6/17-B/I9 1988 ALMS COACH PAOCT. O1/Oi/0A 17 BRA/AA folder A '2 SUMMER CCNCEATS TN ?HE PARK JULY-AUG. 1988 Of/D1/8A 11/30/88 Polder A '3 CAY CAMP SUMAER 1988 C!/01/BB 12/90/08 °olde^ a '1 SUMMER SHIM PROGRAM 1988 O1/CI/88 72/30/88 °older p 15 SUMMER 1988 SOfTBALL ?OUFdMENT C1/01!88 11/30)88 `alder A IS SUMMER 1988 GRAPEVINE MISC. O1/O1/B8 11/30/88 Fo'der A '~ SCMMER !988 ACC IOENT FORMS (REPORTS) C'/O1/BB 12/30/88 Fo ider A 16 SUMMER 1988 INSTRUCTOR PAYMEN78 01/01/88 11/36/88 Folder A '9 SU9NIER :988 SCHEDULE 01/01/08 12/30/88 Folde^ A 2C SPRING 1988 TCURXAMENT 01/01/08 !2/30/88 Folder A Y. SDRINu 1988 ACCIDENT REPORTS 01/01/68 12/30/BB Fc?der A 21 55 ALIVE 01/O1/BB 12/30/08 Foldar q 23 SPRING 1988 GRAPEVINE MISC. 01/0?/B8 12/30/88 Folder A 2t XINORCM~ SPRING CLAGSES 7988 01/01/88 12/30/88 Folder A 25 SPRING SCNEDUIE !986 01/C1/B8 11/?0/eB Folder a 1S SPRING '.988 INSTA'JC70R PAYMENT? 01/01/88 I1/3C/88 Fo?der A 2T SOF'BALL SPRING L'.AGUE !988 3/6-5/29 0!/C'./88 !2/30/88 Fa !der A 09 NLV?ER '986 INSTRUCTORS PAYMENTS 01/P1/8B 11130/BB a'.der x 2S XINTER GRADE'/TAE 1988 C1/0'./BB 12/37/88 Fo1de^ A 30 N!N`E~4 CUSS INFO 1988 01/01/88 12/30/80 ! ! 7/ RECREA?: CN 4E°E4ENCE PAPERS 01/0!/03 !2/30/89 5iC OS-O2-03 1 06-1991 ' ~ l!n /dti ~ / / ~~~ ~~~- td~r Gate: AR AO Oete: SST. TTY A EY CI7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A Ontrcc;ion Natifi cation Aeoort PAGE: 2 GATE: 01/06/91 TIRE: 11:22:220 THE FOLLOXIN6 RECCR~ ARE SC4E0'JLEC FOR OESTAUCT!ON. PLEASE INDICATE THE CE6IRED DISPOSI?IDN, S!GN AND AETURN TO ?NE RECORDS NAXA6EMENi DIY!BION. %/IHF RECORDS LISTED BELOX MAY ALL AE D`.STROYEO. % AETAIN ?HOSE RECORDS HARMED NITN AN N FOR NONIHS, DESTROY THE REST BILL ?0: {532 REWRDS COORDINATOR; SILMANE%. XAREX CEP? : e631 DEPT NAME: C01910)Nltt SERVICES MAIL SORT: PHONE: (7 U )989-!89l E%i: 2109 NARK DATES PERMANENT RECORD CTR. DESTROY RETRIEVAL fi0X %` EV'EN' 3C% CON*ENTS AEG!NX ING ENO1N6 8C'% N0. LOCATlOR Sox DE-1992 DATE SENT T0: ~'clde^ : 3 10?H ANNIVERSARY COMMITTEE 0!/01/83 12/30!89 folder 4 6 SAFE AEOES CON?RACi EFFECTIVE 1/27/89 Ol/01/03 12/30J89 Folder A 5 SENIOR C^IIEXS HEALS WI KNEELS 01/01/03 12/70/89 folder 0. 1 SENIOR CITIZtYS XUTRITIp1 01/01/83 12/30/89 Fo'.der i e SENiOA C1TI2ENS OFFICE OF 961X6 RE6AADIX6 REVENUE 01/D1/B3 12/70/09 0~ Folder A !0 '/IP CLUB AC?IYITIES D1/71/09 12/30/89 Fcider P !! ViP CLUB CORRESPgIDENCE 01%01/83 12/30/89 `a'.der A 12 VIP CLU9 MEMBERSHIP ROSTEAS 01/01/03 12/30/89 alder A !3 SENIOR CITIZENS 41P CLUB NEXSLE RERS 01/01/83 12/30/89 =a'.der P Id iN3TRUC?OR SE.IRCH 01/01/03 12/30/89 `cldx^ R 1S RECREATION DUBLICItt PRESS RELEASE 1983 01/01/03 12/30/99 °a'der ¢ !fi LIST Of :NSTAUCTORS NOIIE6 AND ADDRESSES 01/01/83 12/30/89 `alder A !i PROGAAX IDEAS BABYS!TTIXG SEMYiCE 01/01/83 12/]0/09 roller R 'A PROGRAM IOEA5 GENERAL 01/01/83 11/30/89 °a'der ¢ !S RECREATION-OTHER P.A.R.O. PACIFIC ADVENTURE CLUB 01/01/83 12/30/99 `a'.der 0. 20 RECREATION-0?HER P.A. A. D, CAMP IAVEANE 01/0!/83 12/30/89 Folder A 1! RECREATION CONTAAC?ORS GEX`.RAL 01/01/83 '2/30/89 ~ ~, Fc'der ¢ 22 RECREATION PUYSCNCCL 01/01/03 !2/30/89 Fol oer R 21 NEXSPAPER ARTICLES 01/0!/83 12/30/89 I D/ RECREATION REfEPENCE PAPERS 01 /C1/89 12/30/90 fi3A CS-02-02 folder A ! YOUTH SPQRTS CCUNC IL SPRING-SUMMER 1984 Polde^ ¢ 1 ADDRESSES/SCHOOLS 01/01/99 12/30 /9C folder ¢ 3 AOOAESSES/YOUTH SPOR31AU 07/01/99 12/30/90 ~- - - I 3 {-sa;ixr A NheMn2~LI TI1f-kFAGdF Nt-M'A-FO!IA E1T¢eE{E1BU- ~,. .... u /M/ / / Oaee: A EAO IOete: T. CI A EY 3 12-199! ;, i; c:r GF RANCHO wcAMaNGA Czstruct+o^ No; iEi catim Report PA6E: 3 CA?E: 01/05/91 TIRE: 72:22:260 THE FOLONUiG RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED PoR DESTRUCTION. PLEASE iN"ICAT.E THE CES'. RED OISPOB:TION. BIG4 AND RETAAN TO THE RECORDB MANA6ENEN? CIYISION. X +AHE RECORDS LIS?EC 9ELCN MAY ALl BE DESTROYED. % RETAIN ?HD55 RL,CCROS MAR%EG XI?H AN N FOR MON?HS, DESTROY 'HE REST BRL 1G: AF32 RECORDS COORDINATOR: SILHANEN. KAREN DED? :0532 CEP? NAVE: COXNUNITY SERVICES MA1l SORT: DHONF: ;711)989-1957 E%T: 1109 NARK CATES PERNANEN7 RECORD C1R. CESTROY RETRIEVAL BO% !%1 EVENT BC% CONTEXTS BEGINNING ENDING 90% XC. LOCATION Box GE-'991 GATE BENT T0: L !A A '} A 6VE YBUTIA-fiOFTYALL ~~ Fc',der A '.9 3 % ? BASNE?BALL 9/1S~'.1/15 01/01/99 12/30/90 Fo'der A 2C MOMEXB XINiL.R IX47TAIIONAL !99'. 01/01/99 11/30/9 Lo?Cer A 2: StC PITCH SOF?BALL 2!7/91 C!/O1/89 12 90 °c :Cer R 22 SUPE990X'. NEWS 0 199! 1/25-1/26 DI/OS/8 1/30/90 Lc'~, der A 23 FAL: ACCIDENT REPORTS 1990 C1 89 12(30/90 °clder R 2A fALL !990 INSTRUCTOR RfDORiS (PAYNEN?51 /01/99 11/30/90 °c'der A 25 SLIMIER °-AS%ET&1LL CAMP 1990 01/01/99 12/30/90 Fc ld¢r A 2E SUMNER FCD?HALL 7990 OI /01/99 11/30/90 Fal der A 21 i451RUCTCRS P4YNEN?3-5L'MXER !990 O1/C!/89 12/30/90 Fo?de^ A 19 GENERAL ACTIY;T:ES SUAIER 1999 01/01/99 12/30/90 Folder A 29 SAFE AIDES PROGRM SUMMER 199 O1/O1/B9 12/30/90 Fo?der A 30 BUNKER DLAYGAOUXO 1990 01/0!/99 12/30/90 ~Fal der A 3! CLO ?CXX OEOICAiION ~ 01/01/89 11/30/90 h?der I 32 TEEN PROGRAM CI/01/89 12/30/90 Fc?Eer A 33 YOUTH TENN [S T ANENT 1990 01/01/89 11/30/90 Lol der A ?/ COYOTE CA L BUIMER !990 0?/07/99 11/30/90 Fol Cer A 35 PLAY6 PR06AAX SUXAEA 1990 0?/0!/99 12/30/90 Fc 1 de° P 36 FAMI' FUN OIYMPILS-SUMMER 199^. COYOTE CANYON PARK 01/01/89 12/30/90 Fo1Eer v 37 5' ER BOFT9ALL '.990 0!/0'./19 !1/30/90 Fc'Ce> = 39 UNMEA GRAPEVINE 1990 Ci/01 /89 11/30/90 °cl Cer A ACCIDENT REPORTS SUMMER 1990 01/Ci/89 12/30/90 °o l der IC SUMMER DAY CbMP '990 01/0!/99 12/30/90 Fo? A !! SUTAMER CLASS INFO SUCA1ITTEC !990 0!/01/89 11/30/90 F de^ A 12 SXIMMIXG SUMMER '990 01/01/89 12/30/90 ' ~~/~/p I / / ~ I Cate: A T HEAD Dat¢: ASSL Cf1Y ATTORNEY (~~ ~~?i. C:?Y CF RANCHO CUCAIIfM&A Destroct!x NatiBivattx Report PAGE: d CATS. 07/05/92 TINE: 22:22:300 THE FOLLONING RECGACS ARE SCHEDULED FCR DESTRUCTION. DLEASE IND2CATE THE OESIAED 0] POSITION, 6I6N AND AETURN TO THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION. %/iNE RECOR09 L:SED BELON N/Y ALL 8E OES?fYJYED. % RE?A2N ?HOSE RECORDS MARXEC N1?H AN % FOR MOI4TH5, DESTROY '.NE REST B2G T0: 4532 RECORCS COORDINATOR: SllXANEN. KAREN OEP? : 4532 CEP? SANE: CCMMUXI?Y SERVICES NAT! SOR?: PHONE: (718)989-185! ~(1: 1109 MARK CA?ES PERMANENT RECORD CTR. DESTROY RETRIEVAL BOX !%1 EVEN' 80% CONTENTS BEGINNING ENDING BOX N0. LOCATION Box 06-1992 DA`E SENT i0: Fa2der A e? TRACK 5 RELC-SUNMER 1990 0!/0!/89 21/30/90 Felder Q ",4 SAMPLE SOFTSAL! DACNET (FILE COPIES} 0!/01199 !2/30/90 ~Fc'de• A d5 RECAEATIOF C@IPLATNTS 0'/01/89 12/ 0 Polde: P e5 SDRI4G SCfTBALL 1990 1/t9-7/29 02/01/8 ~ /30/90 `v'.Cer A 4i :N6TRCCTORS PAYMEX?S 6PRiN6 199C 0"/ 9 12/30/40 Fc2der A d9 SP:4:46 BREAK CAY CAMP SPRIXB 1990 /01/99 72/30/90 Po'der R eS GENERAL lXFOAMATIOX SPRING 1990 01/01/89 !2/30/9C Fvl der A 50 ACCT DEN? REPORTS SPAINB 1990 02/C2; 89 !2/30190 Fclder A 5! R.C, YC'?H NRESTLING (ALHS) 3/27-6/ 90 09/tl1/89 1./30790 °v2der A 52 JR KARATE TOUANMENT 5/20/90 O1/Ot/89 12/30(90 Fvider R 53 YWTH BASKETBALL i/7-1/15 0 01(01/89 12/30/90 C,y~ Fo'.der A 5/ MINI - MINTER SOFiBAL GUE +/22-3/18 1990 01/01/89 12/30/90 Fv2der A 55 X2NTEA GENERAL IN TlgX Of /01/89 12/3C/9O y'Aer A S6 X!NTER ACr.ID EPORTS 01/01/89 11/30/90 Fv1Cer 4 5T SUPERBOX S 0 1/25-27 !990 01/01/89 12/30;90 Po'de^ A S9 XCN INTER I9V1?ATI ONAL 2/3-d 1990 01/01/89 ?2/30/90 Fc'.Cer P 59 .ER OAY CAMP 1989 12/18'21 01/01/89 12/30/90 Feder A N!00I`. NAGERS PROGRAM 01/01/89 12/30/90 °v:der E' X2N'EA INS?RUC?ORS PAYMENTS 01/CI/A9 12/3C/90 °v!. II 52 ACVATICS POIICY MANUAL 01/0!/89 72/30/90 .der A E3 MESSAGE 900NS 01/01/89 72/30/9C . C SPECIAL EVENTS C1/02/88 12/30/89 63fi 75-02-01 ! O6-!992 Folder F NOL IC/Y PARK S CRAFT FAIR +2/8/99 Fc2der A 2 .'INGLE BELL BWTIOUE '!/25/89 Po'.dar ? 3 SEN IOA CRAP? SUPPLI E9 Fal der A d 9ALLOXEEN PAR?Y (SENIORS) 10/18/89 Fc2d¢^ A 5 TEEN NALLONEE9 DANCE !C/31 /89 Fc?Eer ! 8 HALLOXEEN fL'N FAIR `cl der c ~ HER!?H FA L4 !C/'C/99 Fvl Eer A 9 C04S-:?L'?i C9 CAY 10/'7/89 Faker 5 9 GO00 OL GAYS S/'1/A9 folder A 2C MOYI EB IN THE PARK 7/20-9!! '989 q /rv/9z+ ~ l l Date: EPA EAD Oate; C!/O2/BB 12/30/89 O1/O1/BD 11/30/89 \ 01(0!/AB OI/01/88 11/30/89 !2(30/89 01/0!188 12/30/89 A7/OI/88 12/30/89 C!/01/Aa, !2/30/89 02/01/88 11/38/89 O 1/01/88 12/30/89 01/C1/9B 12/30/89 I ASST. CITY AT ~OANEY CITY Of R1XCH0 CUCANON6A OestruN.ir,. Na;iticaticn Report PAGE: 5 DA?E; O7/O6/92 TIRE: 12:22:3!0 PIE FCLLCN:S'S RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED FCR DESTR'JCTIOX. PLEASE INDICATE THE DESIRED OISDOSI?ION, SIGN AXD RETURN i0 THE RECORDS NAXA6ENENT DIVIS:CW. z/tHE RECORDS LISTED 9EL091 NAY ALL BE DES?40YEC, X RE'AIN THCSE RECCROS NARNEC KITH AN % FOR MONTHS, OE5IROY ?ME REST B1LL ?0: 453P RECORDS COORCINATOA: SIINANEN, KAREN ^.ED' :x532 C'.P' NAAE: CONNJN!TY SE9VICE5 NAIL SOR?: RHONE: ;711)909-1851 EXi: 2109 NARK OA?ES ?ERNANENT RECCRD CTA. DESTROY RETRIEVAL BOX %; EVEN' 90X COkTEN?S BEGINNING ENDING 80% X0. LOCATION Bax OS-!992 DATE SENT 10: Fo1 de• C :7 CONCERTS IM THE PARK 7/X-0/31 1989 O1/C1/08 17/30/09 ~Fp !der A 12 SPORTS F.'J. N. CANP 1989 ~ 0!/0!/88 !2/30/99 'rider R '3 AFTERYCO4 NAT IMEE O1/C1/88 11/30/89 °older A 1! SENIOR DANCES 01/01/BB 12/30/89 Folder R 15 SA?UROAY MORNING CRAft3 6/16-8/2E C1/O1/BB 91/30/A9 °older A !6 FAMILY SOCIALS CDYCTE CANYON 6/15-7(13 6 8;20 O1/O1/88 12/30/89 Faller A 17 SUMNER MOYIE MATINEE 6/25-8/17 1989 01/01/88 11/30/89 polder A !8 ?ECDY BEAR TEA 8/'.8/89 C'./0!/00 12/30/89 fclde^ A 19 FIESTA 0/'7/09 01/01/89 12/30/89 Polder A 20 1?H OF JU!Y COUNTRY FAIR 7/1/89 O1/O1/BB 12/30/89 Felder A 21 THE GRAPE RACE 6/10/89 01/01/88 11/30/89 'older A 22 SEMIOR LOAD 6112/89 D1/O1/0B 11/30/89 Folder : 23 CARD PAR?Y fi/71/89 C1/01/BB 11/30/89 °older A 26 CA09AGE PATCH PICNIC 6/3/89 01/0!/BB !2130/89 Fc'de^ A 25 FLONER SHOM 5/25/89 Oi/01188 12/30/89 =alder A 26 SPRING CRAFT FAIR 5/13/89 01/01/88 11/30/89 °al der A 27 AIR DAY 6/15/09 01/01(88 12/30/89 Folder A 20 9?H AYNUAL EGG HUN? 3/25/89 O'./C1/B8 !2/30/89 Fnlder R 29 EAS?ER BONXETT SOCUL 3/23/89 01101/BB 12/30/89 Feder A 30 4?. PAT9ICN3 DAY PARTY 3/16/89 0!/01/88 12;30/89 Polder R 31 DEP OAY6 2/19/99 01/01/08 12/30/89 Polder A 31 VALENT!MES DAY PARTY 2/9/89 01/01/88 11/30/89 Faller R 33 0!G NHEEL5 NATIONALS 1/21!A9 OI/01/80 11/30/89 Folder A 34 CNRISTNAS PARTY SEY10R9 12/!0/88 RCNC O1/O1/BB 12/30/89 Folder A 35 MOLIOdv PARTY 8 CRAFT FAIR 12/3/88 D!/01/88 12/30/89 fa?der t 35 WU?IpUE 11/3/08 Oi/01/B9 12/30/89 folder A 37 YW?H CA055 COUNTRY 10/30/80 RED HILL DARN O1/01/88 11/30/89 Folder A ?0 HALLpIEEN F'JN FAIR 10/29/88 O1/OI/88 12/90/89 Folder A 39 SEN ICR HALLOXEEN PARTY !0/27/88 0V01/BB 11/9C/89 °o !der R 10 ALL 5?RTES PICNIC 9/29/88 C1/OI/BB 11/30/89 Fc !der a A' GOOD OL DAYS CARNIVAL 5/'./88 01/0!/88 '.2/3C/89 °c6der A Al 9E9IOR CA,NCE 9/26/89 0!/Oi/E0 12/30/89 Fa'.der R <3 'EPOY 9FAR iEA 6/19 C1/O1/B8 11/30/89 Faider p d4 JUNIOR NIGH DANCES 7/30-8/21 01/O1/BB 11/30/89 Faller G 45 LUAU 7/28/88 01/O1/8B 12/30/89 I Date: HEAD ~ Date: ASST. C(tt ATT i'.. i~: . CITY OF RANCHC CUCANLN6A Daseructioo NoHtication Report PA6F. o DAT`,: 01/05/92 TIM`.: 12:22:38C ?NE FOLLCXI9G RECOADS ARE SCHEDJ!ED FOR DESTRUCTION. PLEASE INDICATE THE DESIRED OI~POS!-:CR, SiGN AND RETURN TO iXE RECORDS NANA6EMEXT CIViSION. % J °,: RECORDS !iSTED @ELOX MAY ALL @E DESTROYED. X 4ETA I9 TP,CSE RECORCS NARKED KITH AN % fOR MONTHS, DESTROY ?HE REST BI!L TO~ E531 RECORDS COOROINATOR: SILNANEK. KARFN C`.P? d531 CE?? NAME: COXAMNITY SERVRES +UIL SOR? PNCNE: (71/3989-1851 E%?; 2'09 MAAK GATES PERAl1AlENi RECORD GTR. DES?ROY RETRIEVAL BO% (%; EVEN? 9C% CONTENTS BEGINNING ENDING BOX NC. LOCATION Box OS-!992 DA?E SENT T0: Fo?der A dfi dTH OF JULY CELEBRATION 1908 C1/07/08 +1/30/89 Folder 9 fi 9ROXN 9AGGER PICNIC 5/30/88 0;/91/08 !2/30/89 fcl der A 48 CABBAGE PATCN P1Cti!C 6/!1 O1/C1/89 11/30/09 fc'.der A d9 V1,P. SA!AD CARC PARTY 6/l 01/01/00 !2/30/09 folder S S0 SoRIN6 POSTER CONTEST 01(01/88 12/30/89 Folder A 51 FLONER SNgI 5/12/80 01/01/18 11/30/89 Folder A 52 SPRING CRAfT FA!A AND CARNIVAL 5/7/88 01/Ot/0B 12/30/89 folder p 53 EASTER BONNE?? SOCIAL 1/14/88 01/01/88 12/30/p9 Folder A 5/ EGG HUNT ANO iC55 !/2/88 01/DI/80 !1/3C/09 Folder A `.5 S?. PA?RICKS DAY PARTY 3/1 T/88 SENIORS O1/01/A8 12/90/89 folder 4 56 A1R DAY CELEBRATIOI 3/!1/88 O7 /01/98 12/30/89 Foyer A ST PEP DAYS 2/20/88 C1/O1/88 !2/30/89 folder A 58 VALENTINES PARTY 1/11/AB SENIORS O1/O1/!B 11/30/89 older A 5S EIG iMEElS NATIOEIAL 1/23/88 M/0'/60 !1/30(89 °ol der F 5O ORAND OPENING CELE9RA11pN REO X(LL 6 HERITAGE PARK 0!/O!/88 12/30/89 °d der 4 PRONE MESSAGES PADS C+./O1/BB 12/30/89 C'5E C` C:?° fACIL: TI ES 01 /07!88 12/30/¢9 Felder A ~ 198¢-UOXS (FEE) Folder R 2 19¢8-L10NS INC FEE1 Po'der A 3 !988-RCNC (FEE) Folder p 4 7988-RCeC (XO FEE1 folder A 5 1900-HERlIOSA PARK Folder P 1988-REDH!LL 6 VINEYARD Folder A 7 '900-CHURCH STREET Feder a 8 '.998-HER1 iA6E PARR Fcl der 4 9 '998-CCYC?E CANYON Fo!de- A ', 1D9¢-BFAA GULCH Folder A '.^. 1988-9ERY! 6 ALiA. LCNA Folder A '2 198¢-110N5 PARR `older A '3 '994-SCHOOLS `c'.der 4 1d 19¢8-MISC. REN?A'. Fo'. der A 75 1988-XINORONS 9/N/~ i / Date; pA T AD Date 639 OS-02-03 E 06-!992 01/0!/89 12/3C/09 01/OI/BB 11/30/d9 0:/01/98 12/30/89 D1/O1/BB 12/30/89 01/01/88 12!30/89 O1/O1 /88 12/30/89 OI/O1/88 12/30/89 0!/C1/80 12/30/89 0+/01/98 12(30/89 0'/01/88 11/30/89 C1/01;98 !2/30/89 O1 /01/89 12/30/89 C'/01/BB !2/30/@9 01/01/8@ 12/30/89 01/D1 8 2/3C; B9 1 ASSL C TY ATT Y t -.. , CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMgIGA 'Oesewctian Not ificattan Report PAGE: i CATE: 01/CB/92 TINE: 12:22: A2D THE FOLLOMiNO RECORDS ARE SCNEWLEO FOR OESTRUCTIOR. PLEASE INDSCATE THE DESIRED CIA$$,P~OS:?!ON, SI6N AND RENRN TO THE RECJROS NAlIA6EMENT DIVISION. % roE RECORDS LSTED BELON NAY ALL BE DESTROYED. % RETAIN ?HOSE RECORDS MARKED X1TN AN % FOR NONTMS, DESTROY THE REST SILL T0: 4532 RECORDS COORDINATOR: SILNANEK. KAREN DEPT :1532 DEPT NAME: COM9)NI?Y SERVICES NAIL SORT: NARX DATE (X) EVENT BO% CONTENTS BEGINNlX6 ENDING Folder A +5 19RB-SPRUCE AVE. Fo?dar 9 71 !988-VICTORIA GROVE PARK Fo7 der 9 19 !989-L1ON5 (XC FEEI Folder A 19 1989-LIONS ,fEEJ Fo?der I 2C !989-RCNC ;NO FEE) Fal der I 21 7989-RCNC ;FEE) ' Folder t 22 19A9-REDNI!L Folder A 23 !989-BEAR GUIk! folder A 24 '989-BFAY! PARR Folder t 25 1989-C.NUACN STRE£1 PARR Folder A 26 !989-COYOTE CANYCM Folder q 21 1989-LIONS DARN 'folder A 28 7989-SPRUCE PARK Polder A 29 1989-YiCTOR1A 6ROYE5 PARK Fclde~ I 30 7989-HER1?ROE PARK Polder t 3! 1999-HEAMOSA PARR °o !der A 32 1989-NINOROXS PARK 19 //O / .... ~ Date: HEAD ~t+i, PHdIE: (71!)999-1851 E%T: 21 D9 PERIIANEMT RECORD CTR. DESTROY RETRIEVAL BO% BOX NC. LOCATIWI Box 06-1992 DATE SENT i0: C1/Ot/BB 12/30/89 OilO1(8B 12/30/89 C1/01/88 12/30!89 O1/O1/SB 12/30/89 Ci/01;88 12/30/B9 Oi/D1/88 12/30/89 01/01/08 12/30/89 01/01/88 12/30/19 01/01/08 12/30/89 01/81(88 12/30/19 01/01/88 12/30/89 01/Oi/8B 1!/30/00 01/O1/BA 12/30/89 D1/01/88 12/30/B9 01/01/88 12/30/89 01/01/88 12/30/89 D1/01(AQ 12/30/89 Deu: ASST. n AT EL76IOLE SO%ES OM XOlO 0 BO%ES XEEOINO TO 6E RENRNED fOR OFSTRUC110N U 00%ES TO BE DESTROYED (Includin0 these ehteh west he RENRMED) 5 is i?. ,is ~.,~: 4 ''-..'T .. Y Cf 9A4C9C CL'CAMON6A 9esCac;'ar. 9Y.'"caviar. P.eocr; 'AGE: :ATE. 09/1:/92 ,.ME: ''.5:08:330 !NE °.^'-LCNLYG RECCRCS A?S SC4ET'lEC EOA OE$?AL'C?:ON• PLEAS' lNDICAic ruc "c5igrn coCS: ^. Ck. SISV A40 RET'dRN TC ^PE ,RECORDS MANAGEMEN` C: C; S!Ok, Y. ~4` ~4ECCRDS L:5?EC 9ELOR MA7 ALL SE OESTROYEO. % 3E'A:Y 'PCSE ?ECCA05 xARNEO N:?N IN % FC4 MONTHS, OES'R07 ?HE RES! - •: !S3- R`.CCACS CCORDiNA!OA: N°T?E, DAVE CEa- . 153' CP7 YAME: ENGI4EER!AG/ADM!N xA:L SOR?: MA 4N OA!ES (%) EVEN" SO% CON?EN'S 9EGINN LNG END!NG ., C°4CNOLCS:DAL CCRRESP04CEy0c c n+/C:/eE C1JC'./eE PMCNE: X7!1;389-!351 E%': 2303 >EAMANEN? RECCRC CTR. OES!RDY REL4!EYAL 9C% 60% NC. LOCATION 9oz C6-1992 OA?E SENT TC: SS9 OC-42-03 2 07-!990 _..._ .UL7 ',996, GENERAL COAAESP:WCENCE '!; 0!/05 07i 0!/05 .....- C.'NE '596. GENERA; CORRESPONDENCE C1/C!/B5 07/C!/BE `o'der A 3 MAY. !995, SEVERAL CORRESP090ENGE 0!/01/86 07/0!/86 . c'.der A d APRl:. !905. 3EXERAL CO,RRESPONOENC`. 07/0!/86 07/D'./e6 alde^ : E MARCH, '935, GE9EAA: CORRESPONDENCE Gi/01/65 07/0!/66 `dme^ i FE9RC'AR7. !985. "uENERAL CORRESPONDENCE 01/01/96 D7/C1/Bfi °c7de^ A ? :A4L'ARY. !966, SEVERAL CORRESPONDENCE C1 /0!/96 07/0!/06 I C ^_N4CXOLCC;CAL CORRESPONDENCE F OYC1/B7 02/C1/88 `c'Eer q TAN, !9P?, G`.NERAL CCRRE5PONOENCE =c'?e^ : . JAR. '99^. M; SCELLAAEO'.'S COARESPO9OENCE `e'der : 3 FEB. 19PC, GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE c~ ,:e- o ! ,P. 198?. MIGCELLANEOlS WRRESPCN DENCE older P MAR, "143?, GENERAL CORRESPONDE4CE 'o'de' " MAR, '9B?, M!SCE,LAN`„OUS CORRESPONDENCE ' dP4. 198', GENERAL COARESPONDENCE `c'de• e a APR. '.967. M!SCEL!ANEWS CORREEPONCENCE ~'.'e q 9 xAY. '9P'. GENERA! CORA85PO4DENCE c':e- a '.: xA°, '937. M!SCELANEOUS CORAESPCNDENCE `d~,der A " JUNE. 1997. 3ENERAL CORAESPO!ROENCE PoL^er F '. :L'NE, '9a'. M!SCf LANE0C5 CCRRESPCADENCE `o'de; q '9 J'J'-V, 'y97, GEVERAL CORRESPONDENCE falde~ p 1d JULY. 1987. MISCFLLANECL'S W~4RESPCNCENCE `older : 'E AL'0, !901. GENERAL COARESDONOENCE Po'Ce- P 'E SE>', 19a1. SEVERAL C09RESDONCENCE :'de- q '^ SEP', '98^, M:SCELLANECUS CORRESPONDENCE .e- A ''8 OQ. 148'. GENERAL CCR4ESPONOENCE `alder 0 19 OC'. '907. M: BCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE fclde- q 2C NCV'. '8P',. GE4`.RA'. CORRE5DON'JEfiCE `o1?er A C' VCS'. '90", M:SC`.LLANEWS CCRRESP09CENCE Po!der P 22 DEC. 1907. GENERA CORRESPONDENCE Po'?e^ A 23 DEC. '997, MISCE!LANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE ~'~ /~6 ~~ ' i / / late: C ^AR?81f:NLTMEW7/ Cate: S60 O1-02-03 ! C2-!991 O1/CI/81 02/01/89 D!/71/er D2/D!/ee 0',/71/07 02/0!/aa 0:/0!/97 C2/CI/88 0!/0'(07 02/01/68 Dvcve7 D2/e1/as 0;/01/61 02/0!/08 0;/C'./67 01,0!/89 :!/0!/87 02/C'./B8 D1 /0!/97 O2/^. VBP 0!/01/87 C2/Oi/08 O1MV81 72/01/86 0!/0!/87 02/01/9P O VO!/97 02/01/80 C'/C;/87 02/01/00 C!/C'/87 02/0!/Ba D'/c'; s7 D2/D!/ee 01/0!/57 02/C VBa 01(0'/07 02/01/08 D!/C1/B7 02/0!/aa C1/0!/87 02/01/98 D!/sva7 D2/o1/fie 01/C'./8 02/01/69 ASST. C.~Y AT?O .~ CI^! CF RANC40 C:ICAM0YGA ^.es; n:Cix~ Nx fficaHa~ Mcc^t RAGE: P CA?E: 09/!d/92 TINE: i5:09:3CC TAE FCLLLAI:4G RECORCS ARE SC4EOL:EC FOR DES?RL'C?ION. PEASE INCICA?E TE'. OESIREC CISPCG!T:09. SIGN ANC RET'JAN ?0 T4E RECORDS MAVA6EMENT DIV: S?CN. X/!F'~E RECGAOS LISTEC 6EL0X MAY ALL 9E DESTROYED. % RE1A:9 TPGSE RECCRCS MAANED XI TN AN X FCR MONTHS, DESTROY ?NE .REST 9:L: 'O: dE5' RECORDS COORCINATOR: NRYTE. CIANE w' :. ,j~, CEPT : 4537 DEPT RAKE: ENGINEERING(AOMIN N/IL GOR?: PXCNE: (il/)969-1651 IXT: 2303 !IARX GATES PERMANENT 9ECORC C?R. OESTAOY RETRIEVAL BON !X1 EVEN' 9O% CONTENTS BEE:NNIXG ENCING 9CX N0. ICCATION Sax 06-1992 OA?E SENT ?C: °alcer 6 2< JAN. '9BP. GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE O?/0!/67 02/O7/6P Po'der p 2E :AY, 1968, MI5CELUNEDUS CORRESPOXOEYCE 0:/01/67 02/0!/B6 Fc'de^ A 2E `EE 1968, GENERAL CORRESPoNDENCE 0±/O!J87 D2/o./ee Fd der Y 21 FES. '966. MISCELlANE0U5 C0RRE6DONOFNCE C7/Oi/87 02/0!/96 .;ate: I ' E \J ' / / Date: ?. C: AT10 FLIGI6LE 60XES ON NOlO D BO%ES NEEOIN6 TO 6E RENRlEO FOR OESTRUCTIOX D 9OXE5 TO BE DESTROYED (?ncTudinq those Nhich must lrr RETURNED; 2 CITY CF RANCHO CuLAXDN6A Destruction Not$?cation ReDOrt 7A6E: ~ DATE: 07/08/92 TIME: !?:!5:530 THE FOLLONIY6 RECORDS ARE SCHEWLED FOR CESTRUCTION. PLEASE 1N0?CATE THE CESIREO DISPOS: TION, 5:6X ANC RENfN TC T!!E RECORDS NAXA6EXENT OIViS?CN. %y~HE RECORDS LISTED BELOM MAY ALl BE OESTROYEO. AA~ RETAIA THCSE 3ECCRDS MARKED NITH AN % FOR MONTHS, DESTROY THE REST 97 LL T0: e1S! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Neely Susan DEPT : 1'6! ^EPT NANF: FINANCE MIL SOA?: MARX DATES !%) EVENT eC% CONTENTS BEBiNN?NG ENDING PHOfIE: ;7U )489-1851 ENT: 2065 PEMANENT gECORO CTR. DESTROY RETRIEVAL 80% BOX N0. LOCATION Bor. D6-1992 DA?E 9ENT T0: ' c A^.COU9TAYT5 f" 'S 07/01/8! 06/29/81 222 1A-OZ-03 1 Ofi-1992 Fc'•der A ! PROPERTY TAXES C7/O1/01 11/29/82 'cyder R _^ PENALTIES 6 INTEREST OY DEllNOI!EXT TAXES 0!/01/81 12/29/82 Folder A 3 SALES 6 USE TA% 01/01/81 11/29/81 Po'.der A A FANCHISES 01/O1/t1 12/19/!2 Po7Cer 1 S PROPERTY TRANSFER O1/C1/A1 12/29/82 Folder A S COURT FINES 07/01/81 12/29/82 Fclder R 7 CTHEA REVENUE 01/01/81 11/29/81 Folder A 8 EXPENDITURES RECOVEREC 01/01/81 ?2/19/92 Folder R 9 SALES Oi MCNIAERY S EWIPMEMT 01/01/81 12/29/87 Fo1de^ P !C RENT NELFARE 01/01/91 12/19/82 Folder 9 1! MOTOR VEHICLE IN LIEU 01!01/81 iT/29/82 Fd der A !Z HOMEOYMERS PROPERTY TA% RELIEf 07/01/81 12/29/82 Feder R !3 &SINE55 1XVENTORY PROPERTY TA% REL1Ef C!/01/81 11/19/82 Fc'de^ A !< TMILER CJACN IN :IEN 07/01/81 12!29/82 °c!der R :S CIGARETTE TAX 01/01/81 11/29/82 Fclder P i6 CFF HIGNNAY L(CEYSE FEES C1 /01/81 11/29/81 Po'der A !1 VENT :ES CODE fINE4 07/01(81 12/29/81 fader R 'E GAS TAX 01/01/81 11/29/81 Folder A !9 58 315 01/C1/81 12/28/82 Fo'.der A 2C REVENUE SHAAIN3 01/01/81 12/29/92 Folder A 2! 9ARN DEVELOPMENT 01/01/91 11/29/82 Fclder R 22 fAU Oi/0+/87 i2/19/81 fa?der R 23 FW (AUDITED) BASELINE RECgISTAUC"ION 0'./01/8' 12/29/82 fc'.der A 2e LANOSCADE MiN. O15TAICT O1/Ot/81 12!19/82 Folder A 26 MISCELLANEOUS 01/01/91 12/19/81 Folder F 26 BANK RECOXCI LIAi19N5 1981-81 01/01/91 !2/19/82 folder A 27 PRW3AN Cf SERVICE 1981-82 01/07/81 !2/19/81 Fclder R ZB 9L'1LDING AC?iV!^' 01/01/81 12/29/81 Folder II 29 CHART Of ACCOCNTS '987-BZ 01/01/81 11/29/92 Folder 4 3C FINANCIAL REPORTS 1981-82 07/01/81 12/19/92 Fo'.der R 37 ;CURYAI ',NTRIES !987-82 0!/C1/81 71/29/92 Fc!der 4 31 CHART OF ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT -MOS- 01/01/81 12/19/!1 Fclder A 33 CARR L AN STREET 1MDROVEMENT FINAL REPORT /01/81 9-81 00 12/29/ 1 E 1 Jate: DE R MENT NEAO Wtn AB9T. CI. AITORN x ~'~•; C?TY DF RANCHO WCANON6A Oest r::cti on Noti'icattan Reocr: P,IGE: 2 DATE: 07/06(92 LIME: 11 :!5:590 ?NE FOLLONING RELOROS ARE SCHEWLED FOR DESTRUCT?ON. PLEASE INO!CATE THE OES?RED 0:9p051 T:ON 5I6M AND R iE RECORDS IIANAGEIIEN? CIVISION. L$ N'- RECORCS :?STEO 9ElON NAY ALL BE DESTAC7. . N RE?AIN THOSE REC ORDS MARKED NITN AN X FOR TMS, OESTROY THE REST e?Ll T0: 1!5` RECORDS COORDINATOR: Xee?v Susar. DEPT : !'S7 DEPT NAME: FINANCE MAI! SORT : PHONE: (itl )989-!851 E%T: 1055 MARK OA?ES PERNANENi RECORD CTR. DESTROY RETR?EYAL 90X %) EVEN` BO% CON?ENTS BEGINNING ENDING BOX N0. LWA?ION Box 06-1992 DATE SENT ?0: Folder A 3l MlNVTE5 0!/C!/8', 12/29/81 °c'der t 35 P. o. STATUS REPORTS 0!/01/BI 11/19/81 ' ! 0 ACCWNiS PAYABLE 01/O1/8/ 06/24/85 152 13-03-03 1 06-1992 FROM RANGE: GENERAL 7ElE TO RANGE: N Fo',der A 1 GENERAL ?ELEPONE CO. 01/O1/8f 06/29/85 Folder A 2 GE9EAAL MIOLESALE PAOdICTS 01/01/81 06/29/85 Folder R 3 GLEXDALE FEDERAL SAVINGS 07/01/91 06/29/85 folder A 1 GLOBAL CONPII?ER SUPPLIES 01/D1/8{ 06/M/85 fo'.der t S GOMEZ RICK 01/01/81 06/29/65 'older A 5 GWLSBY LOYO 01/01/81 06/29/65 Folder I i GRAN? JERRY 01/01/81 06/29/85 c'dar A 8 GREAT VENTURE CONSTRUCTION 07/01/81 06/29/85 cc?der R 9 GREENNAY 6 ASSOr!ATES OT/0'./8{ 06/19/85 Folder A !0 GRISSON 6 JOHN50N 07/01/81 08/29/85 °o'.der R !! H MISCELLANEWS 07/O1/8l 06/29/85 Polder A !2 MAA EW IPNENT CO. 07; D1/BI 06/29/85 Folder R !3 HALSTEC 6 MOGAtI, INC. 07/0!/81 06/29/85 Folder R 14 GEORGE HANCOCK C7/01/81 06/29/85 Folder R !5 HARBOR ADBIINISTAATORS 07/01/81 Ob/29/BS folder A !fi NAATE NANNS CONN., INC. 07/01/81 06/29/65 folder A 17 GARY NAYES N~'OINO 07/01/84 O6/29/AS Folder A t8 NERCNEN ROEDER, NANCY 01/01/81 06/29/85 Folder A t9 PUNICHE NIVELY 01/01/81 Cfi/29/85 fo',d¢r A 20 NOLLIDAY ROCX CO., INC. 07/01/61 06/29(85 Folder t T MOLLEY. B'. LL-DE??Y CASH O7/01/BA 06/19/85 Folder A 12 MOLLEY HILL LAM L. 07/01/81 06/29/85 fc'.der A 23 NORX b ASSOCIATs.S 01/Ot/8< 06/19/85 Polder t 24 S M HOYT LUMBER CO. 07/C1/Bd 06/29/85 Polder P 25 ".UNSBEA6E3 ANN 01/01/8/ 06/29/85 Folder A 26 NYA?i REGENCY-OAKLAND 07/01(81 06/19(85 n Folder t 27 NYDAO-SCADE PAOWCTS, INC. 07/01/84 06/29/8 ~(¢/g~ ~ t ~ / . ( Dets: CE R Oate: T. Cf AttOAN r - CITY OF AANCNC CUCANONW Destrueti pn Notification Report RAGE: 3 CATS: C7/06/92 TIME: 1! aE:01C THE FCLLgi!90 RECORDS ARE SCMEWLEO FDA OEST~ICTION. PLEASE iNOICATE T!!E DESIRED DlSPOS1iI0X, SIGN AND RETURN TO THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT OIY1SlCN. ARHE RECORDS STEO'1~ RELOII IUY ALL RE DEST % RETAIN TX E11ECbILD9 M~!I KED MI'R AA % FOR N~ETItS. DESTROY THE REST Bi LL TO: 115! RECORDS COORDINATOR: Neely Susar. DEDT : /tc; DEPT XANE: FINANCE NAIL $ORi: MARK DATES (%) EVEN' 9O% CONTENTS BEGINNING ENDING ! ! ; ACCOUNTS ?AYA9LE C7/O1/81 06/29/95 FR[al RANGE: R PHg1E: (1111989-1851 EXi: 2055 ?ERIUUdEXT RECORD CTA. DESTROY RETRIEVAL BOK BO% N0. LOCATION 9pz 06-1992 GATE SENT T0: 211 it-03-02 1 C6-1992 i0 RANGE: C Folde^ A ! C NISCELLAN'.OL'S Gi/01/81 06/79/85 Folder A 2 CAPPC 01/01/81 06/29/85 Felder A 3 C ^u ENGINEERING OT/O1/BA 06/29/85 Folder A I C M 8 T A 01/01/81 06/29/85 Folder 1 S C S M F C 07/01/8! 06/29/85 Folder A 6 CAL If0AN1A BVILDIN6 OFFICIALS 07/01/81 06)19/85 Folder 0 7 CALIFOAq IA BUS1NE59 07/01/81 06/28/85 Fclder ! 8 CALIfOPo91A CONCRETE PROOIICTS, INC. 01/0!/81 06/29/15 Falde• A 9 CALIfORN1A DENTAL SERVICE 07/01/8! 08/29/85 Fc1Eer A ID CLLI FOANIA STATE DEPT. Of COIISERVATlON 07/01/81 06/29/85 Folder A 11 CAL IFOAN[A STATE DEPT. OF TRAtISPORTATION O1/O1/BI 06/29/85 Po:der A ;2 GALIFORNU JOURNAL 07/01/81 06/29/85 Folder A !3 CALIFORNIA PARN$ AND RECREATION 01/01/8! 06/29/85 Fclder A !d CALPELRA 07/OC/81 C6/29/85 Fo:Eer A !5 CAMERON REPOAiiN6 SERVICE 07/01/81 06/29/85 Po',der f 16 CAAR PAPER CONDANY 01/01/81 D6/29/85 Fclder A 17 JON CENTOFRANCH 07/01/8! 06/23/85 folder A /8 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 07/01/81 06/29/85 Folder p 19 CNAFFEY JOIXi UNION H. S. CISTRICT 07/01/84 06/29/85 Folder 9 20 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (A.C.; 07/01/81 06/29/85 Fclder A 21 KEN CNAM ANO ASSOC. 07/01/81 06/29/85 Folder R 22 CHASE, AOTCHFORO, DRUMMER 6 9O6UST 01/0!/81 06/29/85 Polder R 22 CHEVRON USA, iNC. 07/01/81 06/29/85 Solder A 2d AIAFK CHRISTOPHER CHEVROLET 07/OS/81 06/29/85 Felder 6 25 CI'RUS MOTORS 01/01/B/ 06/29/85 Fc',der A 25 CiTY,' COUNTY DLANNING COMM. ASSOC. 07/C1/81 06/29/85 k.der A 22 C "' RE91A: 01/01/84 OE/29/85 Fclder A 28 C'.AREMONi BLUEPRINT CO. Ci/01/84 06/29/85 Fclder A 29 COCA COLA BOTTLEING CO. 07/01/04 08/29/85 folder A 30 COLEMAN DAN 07/01/8 06/29 S Ig/F 1871 ~ i i / / Qj I!~ DaG: DEPARTMENT NEAO UdtN: ASST, CI ATiOAN ,;, C:T.Y CF RA.4CNC CL'CAMGNGA Oes:rucNcn NeNHca:ion Reoort PAGE: G DA'E: 07/OE/92 ?IME: 1!:45;087 TP9 FCU_Ok'i4G RECCROS ARE SCHEOL'LEO FOA OESTROCiION. PLEASE :NC:CA?E 7Hc ncc!pcn C;5 O5:"^4, 5!GA AHC RE?L'RN TO ?HE RECCRDS MA4AGEME9T CN!S!CN, ~~ RECORDS L..., : , E R ,_ % RE?A:V 'HO E RECORCS NA,4NEC NI?VAN N FCfi, MONTHS, DES?RCY ?HE RES? 9: LL iC: e:E! RECORDS COCRO!NAiOR: 9ee!v 8csao CEcT . 4'S' CEP' AAME: °!VRICE MAI! SORL PHONE: (ttd )989-7851 E%i: 2055 ,MAR,", ?A:ES PER!IANEH? REL^,PC C?R. ". ES?ROY RE?R:EVAL 80X !%; E:'E4" 9C% 9CV'":915 SEG!NN L4C ENCiNG ACX NC, LCCA?!O5' 9cx CE-'.992 CA?E 5EN', 'C: c'de- + ' COMN SER E4TERPP.ISES 07/01/84 06/29/85 c'rier : 32 CCMM'!1;'° c9G SERVILE. :NC. 71/7!/41 ^,6/29/85 Eo!der : 33 CARCL COY?B 07/01/8{ 06/29/85 c'de~ A 34 CCNPOY CA,RLR ;7/7!/84 Ofi/29/85 rc'de~ c 35 CCNSCL!DA`EC ELECTA!CA L 7:5:.. INC. 07/01/84 CS/29/85 c'der A 36 COP° L!4E CORD. 97/C!/8A 96/29/05 Po'der A 31 COMM''ER SERY!CE CC. 01/01 /8{ Ofi/29/05 'alder s 9B 4 9 CCVEY, LYC. 01/0!/81 06/29/85 °e!der ^ 39 CCYING?ON 6 CAOXE 07/0;/86 06/29/85 ~olde- A 40 CAOXN PR!N?ERS .1/0!/81 06/29/85 Folder R d' COCANCNGA COJNTY XA?Ek C:STRICT 07/C1/B/ 06/29/85 °o'der A 42 WCAMONGA PR!N?!NG 07/01/81 06/29/05 °o'.der A d3 N!LLIAM CU?HBEP'. INC. 07/01/81 Ofi/29/BS ' ACCCOY'S DAYh¢LE 07/0'/E/ 76/29/95 2!2 td-C3-C2 3 C6-1992 F90A RANGE: A i0 RANGE: 8 'a'.der A M:SC'.LLA.4c,CU5 eORCHASE CRCERS 1991-ES ca'de'~ A 2 A I!!SCELLAAEOC'S °c!da" A 3 AA EOU:PMENi REN'ALS `o'de^ A S g 5 D A Ec!der A 5 q-AABLE LCCN 6 NEY Po'der A 7 A-! '„MEN °c!der A 0 A-! SMELL AU*0 CARE °c'der A 9 A6P *I RE SE44; r,E °c'de^ A C A^_'!ON AL'3!V',55 NACP!4E5 °c'', der d " AC'!ON '.RAVEL AGENCY `o'de^ - '2 AGk ICUL7ORAL COMM: SSi DN cclde^ A 13 ALL CARS AO'C SLASS Fclde' A 'C A'LARC. SNL?ON d C'CCVYEP `c'rier 7 ' 4L'A LOMA CHAR?ER 1i4E5 of de" : 1E AMB+CSE NENC° °o'', de^ A 7 AMERICAN E%PRE55 ,g/ ~/gar ~,,,~ ~ , , l Date: EPA THEN? HEAD Oate; 07/81/4/ 06/29/05 O7/C'./84 O6 /29/85 07/7!/84 Ce/29/OE 07/01/04 06/29/05 07/01/86 96/29/95 01/0'/81 06/29/85 07/0!/81 06/29/85 C7/0!/81 06/29/85 C1/C1/81 06/29/95 17 /C1 /R1 06/25/85 01/0!/81 Ofi/29/85 G7/Cf/86 Ofi/29/BS C7/^.!/8{ 06/29/85 0'. /D./81 08/19/05 91/0'/81 06/29/85 C+/0!/04 06/29!¢5 07/0!/04 06/29/05 ASS?. C~0 , Ci TY CF RANq!0 CUCAMON6A Oestrccticr NC;i `iPd;io^ Reocr; PAGE: S CA?E: C7/06/92 TIME: !!:dE!2C ThE FCU.CF.': V'3 RECCRCg AAE SCHEWLEC FOR CESTRUC?i09. PLEASc.:NGICA'E ?HE 7c,S!RE'v 01SPG5!?IChj S!SX ?0 THE RECORCS MANAGENEN? DIV:S:O~. ~ E kEC ~ !!STfO BELON MAY ALL B % RE?A L4 'HCSE 4ECORC5 MA N ~ RR MONTNS. 7ESTROY ?HE REST 9: L: T: RECORDS CCOACIRATOR: Nee'Y 6usan CEP' : !'S'. DEP? MANE: FINANCE MAIL SOR?: DNCMF. !74 i9B9-!851 ENL 2AS6 MAR4 CATES %! EVES' gCX CCN`EN',5 gEGi4N ING ENC!NG Feder A 10, AN P!ANN ING 0.5500 1A?10X' F,!;er d '3 AM ;VS? Of CERTff!EC PLANNERS fc!de^ d 2C RA!P" ANOER504 d ASSOC FATES °or de^ 7 2! AP! AIARN 5Y5?EMS `c?de• A 22 AR90R NURSERY iNC. °o'der 7 23 ARCH!?'.CTS S PLANNERS BOON STORE polder A 26 ARROW TRUCK BOC;ES d EO'JIPMENT INC. Po1 der A 15 ASSCC!A?EO ENGINEERS co?Cer d 26 AOTNELET BEVERLY o'der A 27 g M!SCELLAYEWS Feder b 2¢ B d C GRONERS Fc'. der p 29 9 & N ELECTRIC Fc!der d 3C BOA/!E Fc?der b 31 gANN OF IMERICA Fc'cer d ?2 BANK OF AMERICA H? d SA °cl der A ?3 9A~kC Fader b 36 BASELINE MAROXARE Po?der ~ ',5 9ASS; MATT cc?Cer P 35 gAY1055 S?AT!ONERS fo'.der p 37 SEAR SCLCM TIRE SERVICE Fc!der A 3B BEOROS!AN, NOTCP Fc?der 4 39 BEELCE ?IM Polde• : /C BENECE?T!. JIM folder b d! BE4EF!ELO N!NGSLEY =rider p 42 9E??ER 9::SL4E55 SORP PLUMBING `c lder q /3 BI l'. d NAG'S. INC. Po'. de• A to 91SHCP CCMPAN~ ceder A d5 F.4ANCES 9LACNSCHIEGER Fc'.de^ d d6 CJ RN eOARCNAN CC. ,~ fd~,der P e7 300A 9'J9L!SH'. YG CCNPAYY Fc1 de^ F <? gRUN:NG A !9 AL'CGF' c!UMBiNG 6 ROC'ER .e" t 53 g'Jt..ARJ SPFE?° WES' °or. der b 5' 9000ET CHASLES ceder R 52 FLOYC BURN. JA. °/l~~? l I Oe:e: OE A EN? HEAD Oe:e: PERMANENT RECORD MR. DESTROY RETRIEVAL 90% BO% NC. LOCF'IQV Sore 06-!992 CATS SEN' TC: C1/^.!/8/ 06/29/85 07/0!/84 06/19/85 C7/O i /BI 06/29/85 ".'/C!/81 05/29/65 07/01/64 Cfi/29/85 C',/O1/94 O6/i9/85 01/01/81 06/29/85 07/01/84 05(29/65 07/01 /84 06/29/65 01/01/BI 06/29/85 C7l0!/Bt 06/29/85 07/01/86 06/29/85 07/01/8A 06/29/85 C7/0!J8/ 06/29/85 C7/0;/8< 06/29/85 07/01/8/ 06/29/85 C7/C!/81 06/29/65 C7/C!/81 06/29/95 07/9!/86 46/29/85 CI/01/64 06(29/85 C7/C1/BA 06/29/85 91/01/BA 06/29/85 07/C'. /84 C6/29/8c. Oi/0!/BA 06/29/85 C7/0!/BA 06/29/85 C7/C!/8A 06/29/85 07/C!/86 06/29/85 07/01/81 06/29;85 07.'01/el Ofi/29/85 C7/0'./8< 06/29/86 CVOI/Bd 05/29/85 07/0!/66 06/29/85 C1/0!/8e 06/29/9`. 07/01/84 06/19/65 07/01/84 06;29/6: I A T, CITY ATTOANE, ,.*Y OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA Ces'ruc[~ar Nor N:aHor• Revert PAGE: 5 OAYE: 01/pfi/92 ?IME: '':l6: i5C ?HE Po'~,LOII:XG RECORDS AR`. SCHEOU:ED fO,R DE57RUC?:ON. PLEASE !40!CA?E •uc 7ES!REC 015?LS_!?!ON, 5!GN AND RE?V9X ?C ?NE RECORDS MANAGEXEN'. 0!V15!01;. %/eC RECOP,DS L!5'E DELOW MAY ALL D ES RC % RE?A!4 ?HOSE 4ECCRCS MARSEC X!?H pN X . ~ ESL90Y ?HE P',5: 9!LL ?O: = , 9ECCRC5 CC^RDiNATOR: Nee?v Susan DES? dtE' OEP' NAMF: E!NA4CE MA:L SO9L AARN 7A?ES f%1 EVE4' 9C% CON'EN?9 9EGINXIN3 EMO!HS °p'dap t E3 ~ROSEAN4 9U RN Folder t Sd S'JS L4ESS is CEASE 4E`U4OS PHONE: (1!6;989-!B5+ E%?: 2055 oER!!ANENI RECORD CiR. OESi 40Y RE; RI EVA: 90% 80% X0. IOCAiION Ba% Cfi-!992 DA c SENT ?0: C7/01/B! 06/29/8' '`.i/C!/9A 06/29/85 ACCarv'S "AYA9LE 07/01 /el Gfi129/05 Z!3 1d-03-02 6 05-!991 FROM RAN6E: GAS ?0 AAIGE: Z Fa'~,der A ST?RERF CAL: FORN I4 GAS COXDA4° C7/O7/B/ 06/29/05 F!Ce= A C SAM SPA4GNOLA 01/01/01 06/29/85 Fade- A 3 SCL'?NER% CALIFOR9!A LANDSGPE Mml? 07/0'./BI OE/29; 05 :older A d SDARRLE?TS C7/C?; 0/ 06/29/85 fc!de^ c ' E?ANCARC FRANCS PA!N? C1lC!/Bl O6/29/BS fdder t 5 S*A.N'CN 9URSERI ES, L4C. D7/D1/0l 06/29/05 `r de- x S'AT.` COMOEYSA?iC4 ;NS FUND C1/0!/Bl 06/29/05 °older t ? S?A?E °ABM 9RE 6 CAS :NS C7M i/Bd 06/29/05 'c'der A 9 5`EVE'S MOB!: 07/C;/Bd 05/29/05 -c'de- ? '; 5?EXAR?, •EC C7/CI/8/ 06/29/85 °c'de- : STIN%° ;NC. 07/01/86 06/29/05 'i Cer A :2 SULL IVAN ROGER' P.E. Ci/7!/8! 06/29/85 Feder A '., ?HE SUN CC/C!/Bt OE/29/95 °c`Cer A ': SL'aoLi ER5, THE C1/D!/Ad 06/29/85 'o'iar A !'. T M!SCE:LAS'E.^,L5 C1/O1/8/ 06/29/85 Folder 0 16 SURVEYORS SERY!CE 07/07/81 06/29/85 fo'.Cer t 6 ^, LYS?A.LA?ION, !XC. C1/0!/8l 06/29/85 °c`Cer A :8 9RIG i? N. ?A?E 07/2!/Bd 06/29/85 °a'de- A :9 ?AMRY 'A?; 07/01/81 06/29/85 Fader A ZC ?ftESERV CONPU?ER SERV'.CE 'J1/0!/8l 06/29/85 °older A 2 `ERRAS0APE5 01/C!/9l 05/29/05 °:'.de- 9 2. ".%A W, :NC. C1 /01/01 06/29/05 Fc!de- A 2E eA'4!C:A. 'OOMAS D1/01/01 06/29/86 'cl der A 2A 'HCMP50N PL'9L'SN!4G GR06ti 01/Ct /8/ 06/29/85 c'~,Ce^ C`. T:9N I-5°S'Eu°. :5'C. C?/0!/B! Cfi/29/05 Folder A 26 '. NC 'C~4REZ 97/0!/81 75/19/65 Fo'de- F 1" ?RAVE'. ^; rE T00.45 OT/07/Bd 06M9/86 Fo`. Cer A 28 'PANS-NES' 'OFC ?RUC% I 01!0!/ 06/9/95 p Cate: OE EN A0 Oatr. A ST. CI?Y A??ORNE Y ... T°. CF RANCHO CUCAMON6A Oes:rua:'.ar Ac:i `i ca:'ca Recar. CAGE: 7Ai E: 07/05/92 TIME: '!:dE:2C". rue cOL'-0X!45 R°_:OR7,i AAE SCNEDU!EO POR OES?Rr'CT[OR. PLEASE !ND:CA'E THE CESi REO D!SQCS: T'CN SISN PNC AE?C'RX ?0 ?HE RECORDS MANA6EMEX? CEYIS!'Y:. LYRE REC0RC9 LI S. ~ A!! X R`--?A:V '° ~E RECCRCS XARNEO NI?N AN % FCR MONTHS, DESTROY 'NE 4E5? Ba'_ ',,. - .; RE.^.CRGS COCR.,NA?OR: Neely Susan CEc' !'S' OED? 4AAIE: FINANCE NAiL SOR?: MARK DA?ES %; EVEN- 9C% CONTEN?S AEG!XN [Nfi :NOINO °a?der 4 37 [HB ':RCPHY CASE `cl der 'r 'JRNEFS. !4C. 'a?der A 32 'J +: SCE:LAXEOL'S a'.der : 36 U.S. GOVERYNEN? PRINTING OfFICE Folde^ t 3S CSA PROPER': ES °c?Cer 4 35 UNI'EO CENTRAL 9AYN, TRUSTEE FPlde^ 4 3? 'J4I5*RUT LOS ANGELES `a'.de^ 4 3E U4IT`.0 PAC IF!C CCRDORITI CN Folder t ?9 S41VER5!7Y CCP~ SYS7ElAS Fclde^ 4 dC UPLAND LL'X9ER CC. Felde- A e! ^;?• CF UP!ANC `a'Ce^ A d2 THE !'R9AN LAVD 145?!T, S'TE 'a'der F a3 'JSA TCDA° c`de- A dd J.S. POS: MAS?E4 `c'rier R <5 VAILEY CH°VRO!ET `c'de^ A d6 7 N!SCE"ANEWS °:'der t e• VA'. LE° GOCVC o'der d !6 VANCE CCRPCAA7!ON °c'de^ P 15 X NiSCELLANEO:S Po?der 4 SC 1. d. HAINSCC'T d ASSOC, Fc':der d ;' Xp.LDEN SOUNC Feder I 52 XANE LOBORATOR:ES, INC. 'a'der A S3 XAR!IEC%E 6 ASGOCIA?`.S. JOHN CARL `elder d SI CARL XARREN 6 CO. `o?Ce:^ 4 55 XA9SERMAN LAORE4 `a'Ce- 4 E6 XA%!E.:NLEEN-,!NE CCAP. Fr ds 4 5' HEICLNG 14005'4: AL ?OCL `a'der t 58 WELLS fARGC LEAS IN6 a'de- : S9 NES? DL'8!:SH;NO CCNCA:N'4 °a'der 9 SC XES7ERN E%TEAMINATOR `a'Cs- t S' NES'`.RN' PIGHXAY PRCOI!C'S. INC. Folder A 52 fi5'ER4 ', RRi GA?; ON &JPPLY Fat Cer : 53 NES*EF9 P,OCA Cr PSONE: ;7;d J999-'851 ENT: 2055 PEPMANENT RECORD C?R. OEGT.ROY RE?R7EVAL 90X BO% NC. LOCA?ION Sax 0E-1992 LATE SENT ID: 07/01/86 06/29/85 040'./81 06/29(85 07/C1/8A OE/29/85 07/01/81 06/29/85 01/01/81 06/29/85 07/01/81 Ofi/29/AS 09/01/81 06/29/85 01/01/84 06/29/85 01/01/81 06/29/85 07/01/81 06/29/85 07/C1/6/ 06/29!85 07/01/81 06/29/85 07/01/81 06/29/8'. ^-7/01/81 06/29/85 01/01/81 Ofi/29/BS C1/C1/8A 06/29/95 C7/C1/84 O6/29/AS 07/C'/8< 05/29/95 07/0!/8! 06/19/95 C7/G!/Ad Cfi/29/85 07/0!/81 06/29/85 07/01/84 06/29/85 07/0!/Bd 06/29/95 07 /01 /8d Ofi/29/85 07 ~C!/B/ 06/29/85 07/0!/81 Ofi/29/85 C7/01/AA 06/29/85 DT/C llAd 05/29/85 07/0/9/ 06/29/85 07/0!/81 06/29/85 07/0'/Bd 06/29/85 "7/0';86 06/29/85 07/0!/84 06/29/95 D7{0!/84 06/29/85 I !; ~~ ~J1ygL/ ~ / / i l/A' Date: DEPARTMENT HEAL ~Oa:e: ASST. CITY Ai?ORN C!?Y OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Oestruc:'an No;i `iw:6on ReP~^: ?AGE: CATS: 67/06/92 ?INE: t1:66:1eC THE FOLLO'Ni4G RECOR^S APE SCHECULEC FOR OES?RUCTION. PLEASE INDICATE T4E DESIRE" EPOSI TION, 51GN AND REPJR4 TC ?NE RECOROG NANAGENEN? O:V!S iON'. %^V-,E R6COR7S L;5'. LON MAY ALL 8E OESTAOYED. % RETAIN 7 ~ NEC XI?H A4 DESTROY ?YE .4ES'. Ei L'. 'C: <1p' 4ECCP.C5 COOROZNA?CR: Nee iv Gusar. CE?T :.. OED' 4ANE: FINANCE MARN 7A*EG !X1 EVEN' 9CX CCNT'.N?G 9EGL4Ni9S ENC!NC d. Ce- # fib XE5?ERN 'EXPORARY SERVi CES °ol der tl SS XN [TVEY, NARY Fcl de- # 55 NP.CCX HANA:!AX PAC!FZC 9A?TERY °o'drr n 51 XILDAN ASSCC:ATES °c'de- A 50 C. N: LLIANS PR:N?ING °a?der P 69 XI U.!AMSON ANO SCNNID Fa`de^ n TC N!LLIS NARTF L 'older A 1'. NILSON-RRYANT 5 ASSOC, ~c`Ca,- n 72 NINNEA."i CIRCLE ANARDS °o'der # ?3 N9!GHi, PANEL./ Fclde^tl 76 %NBCEL!ANEC'JS h'Cer A 75 NEAO% CCRPOAATIOM Po1 der A 'S ° M;SCELLANEOUS °o'd¢r 9 17 YOUNG'S c''.der # 76 YUKON CZSWJSAL SE PV ICE °o'der I ?9 Z N;$CELLANEOUS .:'de^ tl BC ZAIKC CHRIS °o'.der A 9' ZEE MECI CAL SERVICE MAIL SORT; eH04E: ;"16;989-+651 E%T: 2055 ?EAMAXENT RECORD CTR. 7ESTROY RETRIEVAL 90X 9CX 90. LOCAi!ON Sox CS-1992 OA?E SEN? ?0: 07/01/64 06/29/85 0?/C'/9d ^.5/29/95 OT/C!/6d 06/29/85 67/0!/61 06/29/65 97/0'/86 05/19/65 07/0',/81 06/29/65 07/0!/66 06/49/85 77/71/86 CE/19/85 C7/Ot/B! 06/19/65 O1/01/BI 06/19/85 07/01/BI 06/19/85 07/C 1/64 Q6/19/65 CT/O1/BA 06/29/66 01/O1/el 06/29/85 07/01/81 06/29/65 97/0 i/Bd 06/19/65 07/C7 /8/ 06/29/85 07/01/64 06/19/85 '~ . ACCO7N'S PAvA6:E 07/0'./81 06/29/65 215 `1-C3-M S 96-!991 F~4CN AANGE: N TO RANGE; RIVERSIDE 6L'JE Folder tl + N NZSCELLANEOUG 'older A 2 NATIONAL GRAPHIC SUPPLY Fo'.der n 3 N0.?IONAL LEAGUE OF C:?IEG Folder # a VA:!ONAI RECREAT ION AND PARK °slder n E 491. !NC. Fo'de^ A 5 NEMAX, !NC. Fc lde- A ? NE?NORK COM'!U4!CpT!ONS `o'de- : B VDVOTNY PUTOMA?!C iRANSNISS CN °olde- II 9 0 M!SCELLANECUS gal dxr A ,. ON4!'4AN5 `~lde- tl 'i NAP.:E 7NTR!VERCS o'de- A '2 CR?ON, LLOYC R. (l~'17t ~y.~n/ ~ l l ;aee: CE. ARTNENT HEAD Date; 07/01/64 06/19/65 07/0!/84 06/19/85 C7/C!/Bd 06/19/85 ON01/BC 06/19/65 C7/C1/6d 06/29/85 77/0!/66 06/19/65 07/01/6d C6/19/65 07/01/86 06/29/85 07/01/86 Ofi/29/¢5 D7/C1{8/ 06/19/95 61/01/6n 06/29/65 07/01/64 76(19/85 ASSi~?ORN. :!TY CF RANCNC CUCAMOYGA Des;ruc:b^. Nc6!`. ica:~cn Reocr; °A$E: 9 CAiE: 07/05/52 TIME: '.1 :15 a79 THE FCLLON:NG RECORCS ARE $CHECOLEC FOR CESi R'JCT!@7. PLEASE SNC!CA?E THE DES! S: ^. C4, SIGN AND RETURN W 'HE AECO.RD5 MANAGEME9? C:VSSSCN C"%^ °= Rc^ ~ rE0 ° LON NAY AL' BE OEST t N 2ETALY T"CSE R;CSRp3 NAA'cE9 N!`;H ~% FOR MOf1TH5, GESTROY iNE REST Si'J, iG: 1151 RECOR)S COORO14Ai0R: Nee'v $usar C'P' d'S' DEP' 4ANE~ F!4ANCE MAIL SCA' NARY OATE$ X` EVE.A° BC% C^.IVTENTS 9EG!NNLNG ENC!4G Po1de^ II ^'der A p =..c ^ 'der A Fc'de- R =c':der A `older A Felder A Fc'oer ¢ Fc'de^ A Falde- ¢ c'der A °olde~ A `de^ 4 =.',dz^ ¢ °d der 4 =c'der A --'der ¢ - de- cc'der A Feder Ftider A co7dzr A °ol der A FCl de' A Feder 7 =c'dcr C c'der A 'o'.de^ A - 'der A Fc'.de^ ¢ =older A c~'de. °cl der A Felder a ° M:$CELLANEOUS PAC!=iC CCA6ME,RCSA! BROKERAGE °ALic!C :CNMITER SUPPLY °AC!=IC PROCUCTS, INC. PACIFIC ROCK 5 GRAVEL CO. EIRN PACKER DA?TOX DESK CI7Y PA7i0N'S SALE$ CORP PEA wJ0 TAMES ^. ?FARCE PS i4EY 9[MES POMC4A ..^.:STRI B:'i1AG CC. ?CRAG PA ECIS:OV 4YORA'u'l:C SYSTEMS PRESSTIGE iNSi PAIN?;4G RRTE C:':'B oo!N?!NG SERVICE/RECORO$ MANAGENEAi °ROGRESS 99L'.Ei!N PRUDEST;AI CVEPAI'. SUPPLY o:,~ a p,TNAN ^ MiSCEGp9E0"uS 00 ^.'- CCRP R M:SCEILANE0U5 R.C..A4C CC. R6R AUTOMOTIVE R6R GENEP.AL CON?FAG?CR RXR ASSOCIA?ES ^riv OF RANCRC : 'CANCBGA RAN CPC ..^;SPCSA'. RaNCNC NECi CAI CL!N;C fAP10 CATA RAUL'; 'TAE SERVICE RESCUE fCCiE,R BE.~i !: L'. CCYS?AUCilON '0 !g ZO 22 2A 25 16 2i 29 19 3C ?~ ~p 3! 3S 3b P 38 3S d^. t' ou,ONE, ('!!;989-185! EX?: 2751 °EFdANENi RECDAC GTR. DEST9CY RETRIEVAL °.A% 90% N^. IOCATiON Bcn 06-1992 DATE $EN? i0: C7/0!/01 06/29/05 Cv,'0!/Ad O6/29,~05 07/C!/B< GS/29/05 C7/^ui/8/ 06/29/05 07/01/8! 06/29/85 97/0!/81 06/19/85 07/0"/81 Ofi/29/85 77/01/81 76/29/05 07/Ot/8{ 06/29/05 C7/Ot/01 06/29/85 C7 /0;/84 06/29/8=. 07/71/01 06/29/85 Ci/O1/8d Ofi/29/05 OT/O1/01 06/29/05 C7/C'./0d 06/19/85 37/0!/8/ 06/29/85 C7/0!/8/ Ofi/29/05 77/Cl/B/ 06/13/85 C7/01/Be 06/19/05 C7/C!/91 96/29/85 C7/01 /8". Ofi/29/85 07'C ./04 05/29/85 O7/01/Bd 05/29/06 OVCi/B{ O6/29i 85 07/01/B{ 06/29/85 07/01/04 05/29/05 01/07/81 05/29/85 C7/0!/0d 05/19/85 01/7'/01 C6/24/05 Gi/C!/8/ 06/29/85 C1/C1; 0/ 06/29/05 :'/0:!81 CE/29(BS Ci/C;/8d 06/29/85 01/07/84 05/29/85 07/C!/8/ O6/i9/BS g/t/4a ~,v / / i~2~~ r Oa;e. OEPARiMEN? HEAC Oate: ASST, .I?Y A?10RNE CITY OF RAMCNO CUCAMCNEA Cestr^C?or No;?",catlan Reoert PAGE: GATE: 07/06/97 'IME: 1!::5:300 lSE FOLLONTNG RECORCS ARE SCNEv;1LEC FOR CESTRUCTICM. P'.EASE !NC!CA?S t0E CES: R°C "~?OS!?ICN. SIGN AND RETURN ?0 THE AECOR- MANAGEMENT O:V!5!U4 ~y~~„° FCOROS L;STE^ B . . , A!L eE CESTRCYEO. X R-'A!4 PS'crk'EE~F~~ARREp-gT'T'AA-fI~'p AIpR~wS, ES?RO" THE REST fiICL -C. 015' RECORDS COOROINA?OR: NeeLi Susan CEP' : A'S' CEP? NAME: FINANCE MAP, 50R?: PHONE: (7!/)989-1851 E%?; 2055 YARN OA?ES PERMANENT RECCRC :TR. DESTROY RE?9I EYAL ^^ (X! EVEN- CCF CCN'EY?E OEGINNING ENC!NG SO% 9C. LOCATION Cox CE-1497 CATS SENT T0; Fclce- : eP RESENTS 9° •HE UNIVERSI?Y OF CAL!PoRk;A 07/0!/84 06/29(85 Fc`der A 89 A N kEI?EP, CEVELOPXEN? CO. C',/Oi/Bd 06/29/85 PoTder A 50 RECkEATI~' REFUNDS C7/O1/86 CE/19/95 =elder A S. 4E:4EAT:CN SYS?EMS !MC. 01/0'./8l CE/79/85 °o',der A S1 RESEARCH INS?!TU?E OF AMERICA 07/01/0/ D6/79/E6 Fc :de: A '.3 ASYNOLCS JANICE 07/0+.;+t 06/29/85 =c'der A 56 P,!TT CAMEgA CENTERS 07/01/01 Ofi/29/0E c`der A E5 41VEAS!OE 0lL'EPALN? 07/01/91 06/29/85 ACCOUNTS ?AYA9LE DZ/0!/B/ 06/29/05 267 td-O1-03 ! 06-!997 FRCM RANGE: RIVERSIDE CONST ?0 AAXGE: SO CAIIF EDISON `c'rier a RIVERSIDE COVSTRUCTION C0. 07/0!/31 Ofi/79/05 -o?deg d Z Ri ZZO R09ER? 01/D1/B/ 06/79/85 °o?de^ A 3 ROBERTSON POMES 07/01/01 06/79/85 °older n e DEANMA ~400R!CL'ET C?/C!/Bl 05/79/fi5 Fc lder A 5 ROCT. L'.5!;_ 0. 01/0!/96 06/29/95 rc'der ? 6 9056, LENTS 6 ASSOiCATES 07/01/81 05/79/85 Folder F 7 40UOEA'J. PAUL Oi/C'./8< 06/79/85 vc?der A 5 5 YII SCEL:ANECUS 77/0'./0! 06/79/95 Pn?de^ A 9 SCCCA ERXeY 07/01/0d 06/79/85 Fo?der A 1C SDC/GREEN-TREE AANCHO 07/01/84 06/29/85 Fc?'er F 1' SAFECO CG. CT/01/8l 06/29/85 Po'.der A 17 SAFETY STRIPING SER'/ILE !NC. 01/0!/Bt 06/29/85 Folder R ''3 CCUN}° OF SAN 6ERNAROTNO OT/0!/BA 06/19/5: Po?der A 'd SA9 9ERNARDIVO COUNTY PRINT SRV/RECORDS MGMT. 07/0'/8! 06/79/85 'c'd¢r A ', SAN AERNARO INC COUA'TY PUBLIC HEALTH OEP?. 0i/C!/01 06/19/05 Folder A 16 SAN 9ERNARD!NC COUNTY RECORDER Ci/C!/8d 06/79/85 °alder a 'i SAN BE RNAROI4C COUNT° SRER'F°S 0710'/81 06/79/05 'c'rier A 'B SA9 SERNpRC!90 COUA?Y 6CL!C NAS?'E MGM? C7/C1/E4 06/79/85 a'de^ A F '0 SAN eE,RHARG INO COON?Y SURVEYOR 07/0!/8/ C6/79/BS c lder A 70 6ANCHEZ 'AEAR;CC ASSCC!ATES 07/01/81 06/79)85 °c'de^ A 2' SAN C!EGO 4C?ARV BRDON CC. INC. C7/0 V8< Ofi/79/85 Fo?der 4 27 SAN FRANf,; 500 4IlTCN 5 ?OXER 07/01/81 06/29(85 Date: 7E AR?MENT HEAL Oate: A531. CIl ATTORN :;?'! OF RANCNC C'JCAMONGA Ces;ructi on Nct'!i¢a.ix Aecort PAGE: OA?E: ^.7106/92 TIIAf: 1!:45:350 THE FOLLON:NG RECCRCS ARE SCHEOL'LEC FOR DES?,7JCTIOX. PLEAS£ INOECATc THE OfS?RFD O!S OG:?104. SIGN AYD R 'RN TC THE R MANAGEMENT CiY:G;ON. C~ ° RF""A^S "STE^ 9ELOM MA° A^ 9° OESTP^°° % RE?AIV *H08E RECORCS MARKF7 1f'"ffi-AN :TFOR-RCNTHS, CESTROY THE REST H!L'. 'C: 41'.' RECORCS CCORCi NAT, C3: Neely Susar. CEc' d'S1 CEP? SAME: F'NANCE hA]'. SORT: NAAd CATES !%1 EVEN' G^% CONTEN?S 9EGINN LNG ENC;NG PHONE: ;71!)989-7857 E%?: 2055 PERMAVEYT RfCOAO C?A. DES?ROY RETRIEYAI 80% 0CX NC. LOCATION Box O6-!9S2 DA?E SEN? T0: Po?de: A 23 SANTA CLARA MAflR `C'T 07/01/B/ 06/29/95 cc?der R 24 GCA3 07/0?/04 06/29/05 Fo1 de^ A 25 GEARF. ROEB'JCM 6 CO. 01/01/84 06/29/85 ~clder A 25 J'JOY SEMP!E OT(0?/Al 06/19/05 Folder n 27 SEP.YICEMAS?ER OT/O1/Bd C6/29IBS 'c'der A 28 SEVER OAY AL'TC PAATS OT/01/94 06/29/85 Polder n 29 CEC?LIA SNAN 07/0!/0! 06/29/05 Fo?der 9 30 SHIPLEY PHOTCGRAPHE9G 07/01/01 06/2o/rS ~o:oer A 3' SLIMS KEY SHOP 07/01/04 06/29/85 °d der A 32 JACN SMALL 07/0!/01 06/29/85 Folder p 33 HEA SMIOERLE 07/C1/81 06/29/85 vc?de- n 36 A,E. SMITH COMPANY Ci/0:/Ad 06/29/05 co?Ee• A 75 SC'JT?!ERA CALIFORN [A ED!SOX COMPANY fiWEXEAO 07/01/81 06/29/05 °c'de^ 4 36 SOUTHc.?4 CALIFORNIA EOISC4 COMPAN°. (X7TAR;0 01/0?/04 06/29/85 ' ACCCL' N'S PAYABLE 07/01/0< 06/29/85 243 !PC'.-03 2 CE-1992 FROM RANGE: '. ?D RANGE: M °c:Eer n MISCEL~ANEOL'S Feder A 2 ;CNA-CEfERREC COMP c'.dx 3 IBM Fc; der A 1 JWIE '.MBOOEN F'.de^ A 5 INODS?ftIAL AGPHA!? Po?der n 5 INGRAM PARER Fa?de. A ? INLANp ?MCX ELECTRIC IXC. Po?der A B i4TEANAIIONAL C!Tv AIGMi. A980C. Fa lde^ R S ;N? ", COXF IN;iLOING OFF!C!ALS 'o'der A '.^, ;4TfRNA?TONAL TIME REC^09CER fclde- G :RTES VALLEY HEAL?u °L AN coder A '2 :" SJ61NES5 COMNL'4:CA?:CMS fc?der n 1. C ' :AESCHXE. iNC. celde^ A .',H COYCRciE colder q 15 JERSEY 6YT". GROUP LYC. Ci/C'./H4 06/25/85 C7/0'/0/ 06/29/95 07/O1/8l 06/29/65 CT/01/At 06/29/85 07101/8d 06/29/85 07/01 /8A 06/29/95 07/01/84 06/29/85 01/0!/81 06/29/85 01/01/86 06/29/85 CT/C!/8d 06/29/85 01707/96 06/29/85 01/0!/9{ 06/29/85 01/0!/84 76/29/85 pi/C:/0/ 06/29/85 OT/0?/8t 06/29/85 OT/0!/04 06/29/85 late: DEP RTMENT HEAD Data: ASST. CITY A(1 EY ~.'.° CF A0.4CX0 CUCAXONGA Cestruct5pn Noti Y.ce:ia^, ,Repot PAGE: '2 CA?E: 07/96/32 ?IME: !7:4fi;?90 ^!E FCLLOX!NO RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED FOR OESTRUC i!ON. PLEASE L4O!CA?E ?XE .CES!REC Oi SPCS iT!OH, SIGN ANO RE?URN 70 THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT OIV!5!ON. "CACS LISTE X ?FAIN' 'NOSE RECCROE NARNEO X:?X AY % FOA ,NON?HS, OE5?ROY ?wE RES? .. " ?C: et9' RECOA0.S COORO:NATOR; Xeely Sesar 0 7EPT 4!fii OED? NAME: FINANCE MA!L SCR?: a!+04E: ;711)959-1851 E%?: 2055 NAR% pA?ES DERMAXENi RECORD C?R. DES?ROY RESRI EVAL 90X !X: EVER' BO% CCN?EN'S BEGINNING ENDING 00% N0. :OCATION Box Ofi-!992 DATE SEN? F0: fold e- A 1, JOSS AVAILABLE C7/01/01 06/29/05 Po'cer A '9 % N;SCELLA.4EOJS 07/O1/BI 06/29/85 ~c'ce^ A 19 Y-HAFT O7/G!/B/ D6/i0/85 °c1 Eer : 20 NA ISEA FOE'NOAT?^,11 NEALTH FLAB 07/0:/04 06/29/85 folder A RANA4 SEARING b SUPP!Y C03P. 07/0!/84 06/29/85 'o?der A 22 C.S. MIVG 07/0!/84 06/29/85 fal Cer A 23 M.ING JEFFREY CT/01/BA 06/29/85 Fo'der A 21 NIRNO'S GRAPHICS 01/01/84 06'/29/8° fp7der A Pi NIPI INGEA MASNINGTOX 07/07/81 06/29/85 °a1 Car 7 2S CE90:E RCP OVICH :7/0!/84 06/19/85 Fader P 2i NRWTi L. OT?0 01/01/84 06/29/85 Po1 Cer A 28 RRUSE, JOAN C7/0"./0/ 06(29/85 Fo'de- : 29 MI5CELLANEWS 01/01(84 06/29/85 °a!der A 3C LAI RO CONS?ADC?i09 01/0'/BA 06/29/85 of Ee- t 3' LAM JACY 07/0;/84 06/29/89 p:Eer A 32 :./NCE. SCLL a LUNGXARO C7/0!/8/ 06/29/85 °clEer P 33 LEAGUE OF CALIF CI?I E: 07/0!/0A 06/29/80 Fa !der 4 31 L: NV: SLE SANDERSON 6 ASSOC. 01/0!/84 06/29/85 F !der : 35 LOCAL DATA 01/01/81 06/29/AS 'elder A :: SALTY L ~L'E 07/0'/81 85/29/95 °a'dz^ P 37 LORlMER. NARK 07/01/84 O6/29/ES FpiCer A 38 LOS AMGf ES ?:MES 77/01/84 06/29/85 Fo ide^ ; '9 'ONE'S PONER TOOLS 01/01/B/ 06/29/05 fp'~~der p d0 LONY OEVELCPMENi COMP, 07/^.i/01 06/29/85 folder A d' N!; NdSCELLANEW'S 07/01/81 06/29/05 F?Eer A 42 BARBARA NC GOXAH 07/O1/BA 06/29/85 Fo'der p 43 NC NAUGHAN, ROGER? P.E. 07!01/81 06/29/85 °s'der A dd NC MAXAN 7ESN OF ON?AR10 07/0!/84 06/29/85 Fo', der = •`. +' MISCRLLANEOUS 07/01/8! 05/29/8,' 'cider P 46 M M A S C 77/01/81 06/29/89 re 1Ee- 4 !- N 5 N REFR:OERA':ON 07/01/BI 06/29/89 • p ' d0 MS: 07/01/84 96/25/85 a'ver P d5 NC UCPIAN. BURf0,R7 L AR; 4', 07/01/9/ C6/29/A5 °c: Ee• A 50 m PITENANCE C7/G!/B4 06/19/85 °~'dc- P 51 NA.:CR LOOM S7PDLY. LAC. 07/01/Bl 05/29/05 ! ~la 111 ~ l l ! (.~v" Date: OEDAR?MEHi XEAO ~Oate: ASS?. CI?Y A'?0 EY C!?Y OF RANCXO CUCAMONGA Ces'^cc:'or Notificatiw: Aeoer' PAGE: !3 GATE: 7TPo5/92 ?IMF: ?!:/S:/3C ?HE PoLLOXIYG REC0:405 ARE SCHEDULED fOR OESTRUC'!OV. PLJSF INOICA?' THc. DESIRED 7: CSI?!ON. SIGN AND RE?URN ?C TXE RECORDS MAMA"uFNENT D;VIS!ON. % DINE RECORDS L ,. EFCW'NdP^AE~ BF ~. % RETAIN HCEE RECCRCS YARNED NI NT ANYFTJIf?:OA!AS^J?HE REST. 9!LL ?0::!51 RECORDS COCRC:NA?OR: Xee',y Susar DEP? : d'c.' CEPT MANE: FINANCE MA:L SCR?: MA RN DALES .':i1 EVENT BO% CON?SN?S BEGINNING ENDING cd~Ee^ : S2 B!,L MANN d ASSOCIA?ES °o`~:der A S3 MARCO'T MICHEAL Fo!de^ : Se JAMES ',. MARNMAN °c'der A c5 MAR?IN e'JS!NE55 MACHINES coder v S5 MARTINS2 RICHARC B. Fo'.der A 51 NAR?INEZ UXIOX SERVICE Fader A 59 NA?CRAM NAREN odder n co •vuw cyu; A09MEXUL, INC. So lde^ A 6tl MA?L OCN S XiNEBEAG °c ;der F 6' MAXFELD?, MILIIAN Fo'de^ A 62 MEY9R DA? Fader A 63 gNELS, JON Folder a 69 R; CHART MI45 ASSOCIATED Po1Ee:^ A SS N;'VE, SHARON PETTY CASH °c'de- F 56 NI SO ION CAR RASP °c'de~ A 6' Mi'CHEFF 6 SON. i4C. AU.EN ' o`de' A SB N04?GLAIR ACTC OCOY °o'de^ p 69 NCR?Y'S CHEVROLE?, INC. !der n MOTOROLA !N^.. ,:'der 9 7' y:".?!CHANNEL HENS PHONE: ;i!1;909-!051 E%?: 2055 PERMANENT RFCDRO C?R. DESTROY RETRIEVAL 90% 00% NC. LOCATION 0ox CE 1992 DA?E SE4' ?C: 07/01/Ad 06/29/05 C7/C1/0/ C6/29/05 C7/C1/B/ 06/29/95 07/0!/9! C6/29/95 01/0!/01 06/29(85 ^.7/01/91 06/29/65 07/O1/81 06/Z9/05 77/0!/81 06/20Aec 01/01/0{ 06/29/95 07/0!/9! 06/29/09 07/01/8/ 06/29/80 77/01/8{ 06/29/95 77/0!/9{ 06/29/85 07/O1/0i 06/29/95 C7/C1/01 06/24/05 77/0'/91 C6/29/05 07/C1 /9< 76/29/85 01,'01/9! 03/29/05 01/01 /61 06/29/86 07;0!/81 06/29/95 ,. A9000N'.6 PgYA9LE 07/0!;09 06/29/05 299 IS-0!-D3 2 C5-".992 FROM RANGE: A ?0 RANGE: GENERAL TELEPHG Fo~Ee~ v 0 M!SCEU.ANEOUS 07/0!/0/ Ofi/29/05 Fo'der v ^./HL, RICHARD ",1/01(91 06/29/85 c['de' A 3 NALCFN OANL MAINTENANCE 0"/0!/91 06/29/05 cdEer v d DAI L`' REPCR? 07/01/91 06/29/85 °c'.de~ v DA I$° NH6P. 4iEB04 CC, i4C. C7; C1 /01 06/29/85 <e'de- v 6 SI,'S;E DAV: 05^M 91/0!/01 06/29/05 rc lEe- p ~ GAY-?[MFRS. ;4C. C7/C'/89 Ofi/29/85 >'Eer e 0 000 CE:OURNET? 07/01/91 06/29/85 Ec'der A 9 CER9!SH GUERRA d ASSOC. 07/01/01 06/19/05 cc`der N ,C GE?CO C7/C!/01 06/29/85 ' g/8-lQy ~ l l l~ late: DE AR NFNT NEAO Oate: 'ASST. ITY AT EY CI?Y CF .RANCHO CUCAMON6A Destrcct ion Nc; iiicaaon Ration CAGE: 'd DATE 07/06/92 TINE: 1!:66:170 ?HE FOLIONINC RECCRCS ARE SCNEDULEO FOR OESTR'JCTION. PLEASE INCICA?E IRE DESIRED 7:SPOBiTIG! GN AND RE?'JRY TO THE RECORDS MANA6EMEN? D:ViS iDN. % NE RECORDS LISTED MA STROYED. % RE'Ai4 THC ...., X FOR MONTHS. OESTA ~ THE REST 9: L! ?;; !15! RSCORC5 COCROINATOR: Nee?y 5'asan DEPT e!61 9EPT NAME: F'.YANCE DARN CATES !%1 EVEN- BOX CQYTENTS BESINA INu ENDING MAIL SOR?: PHONE: (.!d )g89-105' E%T: ;055 PERMANENT RECCRD CTR. DES?ROY RETRIEVAL 80% BCX NC. LCCA?ION Box Ofi-!992 DATE SEN• ?0: Feder t 1' CiCK50N CC..:NC. =cl der A i2 :?APHCNE CORP. Polder s '3 ORP.AING 90ARC COMPUTER. SUPPLIES `o'iler c 'A GAYLE CXORAN Fc Eder R 1S CiANE RYAN Po1 der ? !5 E !IISCELLANEOU6 folder A '7 EASTMAN, INC. Polder 9 10 EWCA?IOX b INFORMTION SERVICES Fc'.der A !9 EISENHART IAMRFNCE 5 Polder A 20 E!ECTRO 51ETRCLCGY CCRP, Fader F .~ ?HE EMPIRE CC4SPA4Y Fc!der A 22 EMPEY HARRY Falde^ A 2? EMPLOYMENT OEVELOPME9T DEPT. `o?de^ A 2t ESGII CORPORATION `older A 2E EVANS %EVLN Polder A 26 F MISCELLANEOUS `o?der A 27 `MC CCAPCRAT!ON `older A 28 FANTASY ?-SHIRTS °clde- A 29 FEDERAL EXPRESS COAa. F `der A 3C FENCE CAAf7 CF UPLAND, INC. Fa !der R 3' F: ELDMAN. RO!APP 8 ASSOC. Folder 9 32 EIRST INTERSTATE BANK fcl der A 33 FONTAXA XOOC PERSERVING Fd der R 3A FCCTN ILL :AXN HONER SERVICE Fcl der A 35 '!AL fOTN 6 SONS Fc Tiler A 3fi FRI SCH E9 6 ASSOCIATES, DONALD Polder A 37 FLV Ii 6 TATSUMI Polder 4 30 G N(SCEL!ANEOUS Fal de^ e 39 GPS COA'SC'.T:NG Ci V:L '-HG iNEERS =c'der A i0 GENCO Feder A r GE4E7A'. ?E L `.PHONE CO Date; DE ARTMEN? AD Oe:e: C1/G1 /64 06/29/05 07/0!/01 06/29/05 OT/C!/0/ 06/29/06 CR/O1/0/ 06/29/86 Ci/O1/07 06/29/85 D7/05/AI 06/29/06 07/05/01 06/29/85 07/01/81 06/29/85 Ci/Oi/0/ 06/29/65 07/0'Jel D6/29/05 07/01!0! 06/29/05 07/0!/8/ 06/29/85 C7/Oi/BI Ofi/29/BS 07/01/0/ 06/29/05 07/01/Bd D6/29/95 07/Ci/BA 06/29/05 01/01/81 96/29/05 01/Oi/Bd 06/29/05 OTi O!/81 Cfi/29/05 CT/0!/01 D6{29/05 0710!/01 Cfi/29/BS 07/01/81 06/29/85 OT/0'. /8/ 06/29/85 07/01/0/ 06/29/65 07/0!/Bd 06/29/05 07/01/0/ 06/29/05 Ci/0!/BA 06/29/85 C1/01/BA 06/19/05 07/01/0{ 06/29/85 CT/0'./01 06/29/95 CT/Oi/Bt 06/29/85 I(/~-~ ASST. CITY ATTO EY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Y DATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Ctty Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: RELEASE OF A REAL PRODERTY IMPROYEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEF AGREEMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASING 6809 HELLMAN AVENUE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, BETNEEN 19TH STREET AND MONTE VISTA STREET, SUBMITTED BY LASZLO AND ERZSEBETN YASS tt 1s recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution reieasing 6809 Hellman Avenue, aM authorizing the Mayor to sign satd release and the C1tY Clerk to record same. BIICI(GRW ND/AIW.YSIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by Council on January 16, 1991, and recorded on January 30, 1991, as Document No. 91-033956 Tn the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. The agreement was Por construction of missing off-site improvements adjacent to the property. Hix Development has constructed the required off-site improvements as conditions of approval for TR 14192 adjacent to the Vass's properfy, thereby ellmtnating the need for this Real Property Improvement Contract and L1en Agreement. Respectfully submitted, ~~l~Ict.l Ni111am J. O'Ne111/ City Engineer HJO:SM:jh Attachment S RESOLUTION N0. 9a ' ~J 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LiEN AGREEMENT FROM LASZLO AND ERZSEBETN VASS NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 91-014 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Laszlo and Erzsebeth Yass ;and NHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and L1en Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on January 30, 1991, as Document No. 91-033956 ;and NHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and L1en Agreement is no longer required. NON, THEREFORE, BE It RESOLVED that the City Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and lien Agreement from 6809 Nell man Avenue (See attached Exhibit "A") and that the C1ty Clerk shall cause Release of L1en to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bvnardlna County, California. SCM (tt1VE! !!~ IC W ^ i ~ ~~ ~Ii/~ GRi~f.Cr111rV YIV~~T 4 I' ~I II ~I ~'(E~ 6809 HELLMAH AYPSIUE ~~ ~E0.5E OF LIENOF LI@I _ EXMNBIT• "A" _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' '~ FRGM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~~~-~ -~•~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager 8Y: Willie Val Buena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 1164C, LOCATED AT THE EAST CORNER OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST AND NAUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE AND SUhIMARY VACATION OF A PORTION OF RIGNT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY LEW IS HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Counctl adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 11640 and summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way adjacent to Terra Vista Parkway East and Mountain View Drive and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said vacation and map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 11640, located at the east corner of Terra Vista Parkway East and Mountain View Drive, within the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1992, for the creation of a single 9,8 acre parcel for the development of an elementary school (Exhlhit ~~C~~i. The public streets adjacent to the site are improved with the exception of sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights and landscaping which are required to be constructed at the time of development of the site. The Developer, Lewis Homes, is submitting a cash bond for the setting of the monuments in the following amount: Monumentation Cash Bond 52,450.00 Lewis Homes is also requesting that the City vacate a 6 foot wide strip of the Terra Vista Parkway East and Mountain View Drive right-of-way adjacent to the parcel (see Exhibit "B" and "C"). This right-of-way was originally intended for trail purposes. However, the trail has been relocated making the right- of-way unnessary. The Planning Commission found the vacation to be consistent with the General Plan. 5 CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA ' '~ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Val Buena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 11640, LOCATED AT THE EAST CCRNER OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST ANO MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE AND SUMMARY VACATION OF A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIYE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES STAFF REPORT.' ,~ DATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ...~~ .....~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 11640 and summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way adjacent to Terra YTsta Parkway East and Mountain Yiew Drive and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said vacation and map to record. BACK61i011ND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 11640, located at the east corner of Terra Vista Parkway East and Mountain View Drive, within the Terra Yista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Comni 551on on May 13, 1992, for the creation of a single 9.B acre parcel for the development of an elementary school (Exhibit ~~C~~l . The public streets adjacent to the site are improved with Lhe exception of sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights and landscaping which are required to be constructed at the time of development of the site. The Developer, Lewis Homes, is submitting a cash bond for the setting of the monuments in the following amount: Monumentation Cash Bond 52,450.00 Lewis Homes is also requesting that the City vacate a 6 foot wide strip of the Terra Yista Parkway East and Mountain View Drive right-of-way adjacent to the parcel (see Exhibit "B" and "C"). This right-of-way was orlglnaliy intended for trail purposes. However, the Lrail has been relocated making the right- of-way unnessary. The Planning Commission found the vacation to be consistent with the General Plan. CITE COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 11640 - LEN IS HOMES October 7, 1992 Page 2 Section 8334a of the Streets and Highways Code states that local agencies may summarily vacate (by resolution) an excess right-of-way of a street which is no longer required for street and related purposes. Respectfully submitted, ~~Cti ~~~~ William J. O'Neill City Engineer WJO:WV:jh Attachment - ~;j -~ RESOLUTION N0, 9a-~150 A RESOLUTION OF TH'c CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 11640 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 11640, submitted by Lewis Homes of California, Subdivider, and consisting of 1 parcel, located at the east corner of Terra Vista Parkway East and Mountain View Orive, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1992, as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 11640 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, said subdivider has met the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. That the Final Map be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 11640 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION N0. 9a~.a.~9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY GRDERI NG THE VACATION OF A 6 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE PROPERTY AT THE EAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE TWO STREETS WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of a street or highway as excess right-of-way herein more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said portions of streets are no longer required for street or highway purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating said portions off' streets on Map V-12.3 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations~ezceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess rigTit=of-way no longer constitutes portions of said streets. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution t-~o a recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption ~-resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. ~7 EXH/B/7- .9 ~~ LEGAL DESCASPTI N THAT PORTION OP PARCHL 2 OP PARCEL NAP NO. 7267, IN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, COUNTY OY SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OY CALIPOpNIA, PER MAP RECORDED IN H006 78, PAGE5 43 AND 44 OF PMCEL NAPE, IN THE OFPICE OP THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS POLLONSt BEGINNING OP THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OP MOUNTAIN VIEW pRIVE AND TERM VISTA PARBWAY EAST, THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OP MOVNTAIN VSEN DRIVE NORTH 44'04.11" EAST 66.88 PEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE SOUTH IS°55'49' EAST 44.00 PEST TO TNB TpVE POINT Op BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 4{'04'11" EAST 391.23 YEET TO A TANGENT CURVE CONGVE NORTNHESTERLY MVING A RADIUS OP 794.00 PEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OP 08'16'57", AN ARC LENGTH OP 111.78 PEST TO A POINT TY.HOOGH NHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 5{'12.46• EAST; THENCE SOUTH 48'09'09' EAST 6.03 PEST TO A POINT ON ANON-TANGENT CURVB CONGVE NORTNWESTBRLY MVING A RADIUS OP 800.00 PEST TO NHICN POINT OY BBGINNING A gADIAL LSNE BEARS SOUTH 54'10'02' EAST; THENCE SOUTHNESTERLY ALONG SAID CtiRVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OP OE'11.1J', AN ARC LENGTH OP 115.01 PEST; TNENCB SOUTH 41'04.11' NEST 385.43 FEET TO A TANGENT l`URVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OP 24.00 PERT; THENCE SOUTNBRLY ALONG SAID CURVP. THAOVGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OP 8T 57'19', .AN ARC LENGTH OF 76,84 PEST TO THE REGINNING OP A RSVP-RSE CVAVB CONGVE SOUTHWESTERLY MVINC A RADIUS OY 2050.00 FEET THROUGH NHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 16'06.52" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OP 08'78'20', AN ARC LENGTH OP 309.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35'14.48' EAST 392.93 PEST; THENCB SOUTH 14'46'59' WEST 6.09 PEST; TNENCB NORTH 35' U YB" WEST 793.98 PEST TO A TANGENT CURVE CONGVE SOUTNNESTEpLY MVINC A RADIUS OP 2,014.00 PEETp THENCE NOATNWESTBALY ALONG SAID CURVE TY.ROUGN A CENTRAL ANGLE OP OB°4]'57", AN AAC LENGTH OP 313.92 PeET TO THE BEGINNING Ue A REVERSE CURVE CONGVE EASTERLY HAYING A HADIUS OF 24.00 FEET THROUGH WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 45°57'15' EAST, THENCE NOPTNEALY ALONG SAID CURVP. THROUGH A CENTML ANGLE OP 88'06'5 Y oQp,OFESSION~~ ,~",~. 'y0.?OM t/'°a~~1m, o m o, I ~B~ ip ~ R~'~ z ,~?CIV'•~~~! ARC LENGTH OP 36.91 P4ET TO THE TAtfE POINT OP B¢GINNING. PAEPARED BY NADGL¢ AND ASEOCIAT¢5~ INC. OP THE INLAND EMPIRE GEPT¢HBF.R 22, 1992 S.N. t26-9345 p0.0F E651p xB/]9 ~~e~4s~late.9k~'s 3 °°x o. ~ e CIVIL ~ ~~~ pF cAUF~~ t~~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~~~~ q ~ ~e 0 r,: o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ i s ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 3 w ~ 8 ; 8 ~ ~ W;u : ~. ~ , ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ~'~ " ~ ~ '~ ~e 3, w e ~ ~~._ ~ ~:_ y l 1 _~ ~ AREA 7L7 BE /AC.o7E0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NGINEERING DIVISION „r 1 ITENt /Y/AP V /23 TITLE: ~~ EXF1161T: B . j /~ ~~ 1~G~~J ~7\~ ~ \~ / i ~ ~L i. / /y ~."`\~~'~~ ~ ~~ ~°~ ~ \ ~' 4E a _ -'"~- ~ PpOW s ~ 8 0 \ \ PP1. ORtVE /": /30 N CITY OF TEEM: PARCEL MAA 11640 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'TITLE: ENGINEERING DTVL9ION EXHIBIT: C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~~~ STAFF REPORT ~ .,~ -' DATE: October 7, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jo Lynne Russo-Pereyra, Integrated Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: RESOLUTION FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE GRANT APPLICATION RECOMMENDA'f10N The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the City's application for the Household Hazardous Waste Grant application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. BACKGROUND The California Integrated Waste Management Board established the Household Hazardous Waste Grant Program upon enactment of Assembly Bill 2448. The purpose of the program is to award grants to local agencies with the responsibility of managing programs that help prevent the disposal of household hazardous waste at solid waste landfills. The grant program has two grant cycles, one for non-discretionary and one for discretionary grants. The integrated Waste Management Board is currently conducting the first grant cycle for non-discretionary grants. A non-discretionary grant is an award to reimburse a jurisdiction for a household hazardous waste program already implemented in the fiscal year prior to the grant application period. The City's Permanent Household Hazardous Waste Collection Site has been in existence since 1987 and according to the grant guidelines would not qualify for reimbursemeut. However, during the past fiscal year City Yard employees have been used to assist the on-duty fire personnel by staffing the Collection Site on Saturday's. It is this portion of [he program which qualifies for the grant and has been applied for reimbursement. Resolution for the Household Hazardous Waste Grant Application October 7, 1992 Page 2 of 2 The grant instructions require submission of a resolution from the applicant's governing body. Due to timing constraints, and [o avoid the missed opportunity of gaining reimbursement, the Resolution will be ferwazded following the submission of the grant application. The Integrated Waste Management Board officials stated it was not necessary for the Resolution to accompany the grant, as long as the Resolution was received before the grant was awarded. PiSCAL IMPACT The grant application does not require the Ci[y to provide any matching funds or other cost commitments. The City is seeking salary and benefit reimbursement in the amount of $2,219. Respectfully subm' d, ' C'I1~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:jlrp Attachment ~~ ~t~la~h'on No. ~a-ago A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'X COUNCIL OF THE CIT'l' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING SUBMIT`T'AL OF THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is in the public interest to enact and implement an integrated waste management plan to address the State's diminishing landfilt space and potential adverse environmental impacts from landfilling; and WHEREAS, funds have been established by Assembly BiII 2448 (Eason, 1987}, and aze available from the Solid Waste Disposal Site Cleanup and Maintenance Account in the General Fund through the California Integrated Waste Management Board for grants to local government for waste diversion and separation programs to prevent the disposal of hazardous waste, including household hazardous waste, in solid waste landfills. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that effective October 7, 1992: ~CSi9QL The Household Hazardous Waste Grant application is authorized for submittal to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Section 2• The City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and empowered to execute all necessary applications, contracts, and agreements and amendments hereto for Ute purposes of securing grant funds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in this application. ~P I ~.x lx yr nrxrvi,nv i,u~nrvx~iv v~+ STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Will tam J, O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer y^` , SUBJECT: SUMMARY VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-NAY 6ETWEEN OAY CREEK. CHANNEL AND THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the summary vacation of a portion of Railroad Avenue South and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to record same. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Redevelopment Agency is requesting the vacation of a portion of Railroad Avenue south extendingy from the future Day Creek Boulevard to 685 westerly. The right-of-way is 40 feet in width. Upon vacation, the right-of- way will revert to the properties to the south which are tc be developed as Fire Station No. 3 and the C1 ty Housing prof ect. The Tentative Parcel Map (no. 13859) for the Fire Station parcel was approved by the Planning Commission on December 17, 1991. At that time, the Planning Commission found the vacation to be consistent with the general plan. The vacation meets the provisions of Section 8331 of the Streets and Highway Code for summary vacation in that: a. The street has been impassable for five consecutive years, and b. No public funds have been expended for its maintenance. Respectfully submi tied, ,.1 ~. ~ ~ ~. C.`- William J. O'Neil -~ City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~~,~~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BE RNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A RORTION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8331, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that portion of Railroad Avenue South is unnecessary for present or prospective publ Tc street purposes because for a period of five consecutl ve years, said street has been impassable for vehicular travel and no public money was expended for maintenance on said street during such period. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby •makes its order vacat ng that portion of street on Map Y-122, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the Ct ty of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said port on o e City street no longer constitutes a street or public easement. SECTION 3: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations- a~ exceptions, 1f any, for existing uNltties on record. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution two a recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption o t s resolution, and it shall there upon take effect and be in force. `-L~ W E.'rtiiai r ';~ „ LEGAL DE3CItIPTI011 Proposed vacatipn of a Portion oL Railroad Avenue South Being a portion of Reilrpad Avenue South (40 feat vide), Orange Repire Acres per plat recorded In Book 20 of Nape, Page 1, records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, state of Calilornia, Cora pertlculstly daacribsd as•thet portion of said Railroad Avenue South lying northerly of end adjacent to Lots z1 through 2t inclusive of said orange Expire Acres, bounded on the vest by the northerly prolongation of the veatarly line oL said Lot 21 and on the nest by the northerly prolongation of the easterly line of Bald Lot 2L. c~ilii/Ui i L~ I el ~~ (ran, V V~~ ~I 'i z n T' I :e I .• I ;~ I .® ~. .. 1 I I I 1 1 i A.PE~ ro aE ~,gcArEo ~ I i I ~ I • ~~ 2 N , 1~ I~ ~t M ~ ~~ j 11 I ~o~ ®i I.®K An.~.{i . ~~ / I ~o ~ ©I© ~bK ~]fK ~}1K ~YK. ~HC 39 PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAILROAD AVE. SOUTH. I I I ©~. ~ 1. ~ ~ ...~K I ~ o ~ o; ~~I ~ ~n~bl~l ~~ I,~ I ~~ i ~ ~ t* CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ~ Mr4P / /22 ENGMIEERING DIVISION ~E; '~G io OFA PoRr .~~/L~ AVF, 5~U1 ~x~: ,B ~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .. i;-•-~ STAFF REPORT GATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE GISTRICT N0. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 FOR 6, FOR DR 89- 04 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE Of CARNELIAN STREET, NORTH OF 19TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO PLAZA, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECONIENDATION It is recommended that the CTty Council adopt the attached resolutions ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6. ANILLTSIS/BACKGRWND DR 89-04, located on the west side of Carnelian Street, north of 19th Street, is required to fulfill certain conditions of approval along with the normal processing. As part of those conditions the Developer is required to have the protect annexed into the appropriate lighting and landscape maintenance districts. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Attached is the resot ution requiring adoption by the City Council to complete the proposed annexation. Respectfully submi ted, ~1~~C William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJ O: SM:jh Attachments `L~ RESOLUTION N0. ~.~-~(Q~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 38 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 89-04 (APN 201-811-57 b 58) WHEREAS, the City Counc it of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Hl ghways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and desl9nated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 38, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter Z of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attache4 hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That Lhis leglsiative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto to the Maintenance 0lstrict. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including tTie Tevy of ail assessments, shall be applicable Lo the territory annexed hereunder. 20 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 99 JJ ,~AI~''J \ Ii lee Q~ $ ~~ r .eu ~ II ~ ~~~~ W Par 4 c Z 99 Par. 3 61 o Par, S ~i =~~- ® ~O P r 2 . o o PaFI " V ~.__ ~fi. ~YJ M IJJ t~f.f) ~ -NFHETE~- STREET ~ ~- - ----}- ~^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR 89-04 EXHIBIT 'B" PROJECT: DR 89-04 ND. OF D.U.: N/A AP,EA .43 Ac STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Assess No. of Lamps to he Annexed District ko. Units 58UII~--~JSODC --I6';-DDS-22;000" 27;5DU 1 .86 _._ -- --' --' --- 6 .86 -'- --- --- --- --' LANDSCAPF MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Assess Community District No. Units Street Name Equest.Trail 38 .43 Carnelian St. --- SJMaO/7/92 Turf Ground Cover Trees Sq• ft• Sq. ft. Ea. --- -- 4 (Existin3) 7a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT >~ DATE: October 7, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Mana gez FAilM: Brad Buller, City Planner HY: Anthea M. Har ti g, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 92-01 - WARREN/THORPE HOUSE - A proposal to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce the property tax on the historic property located at 6112 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga - APN: 1062-381-Oi RECO!!ffi1DATION Staff rec onanen ds that the City Council approve the contract for Mills Act Agreement 92-01 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Albert Sena For the Warren/Thorpe House. HACRGIdOpND In August 1988, the Council discussed incentives that would encourage historic preservatron activities and promotion. The Mills Act allows for the owner of a designated landmark to realize property tax reductions upon entering into a preservation contract with the City. The first such contract was approved by Council on Apri) 4, 1990, and prior to that time, the potential minor lose of revenue from the General Fund was addressed in a memorandum to the Council in August of 1989 (see Exhibit "A"j. Aece nt conversations with the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office have of £ixmed our initial estimates for the costs involved with a Mills Act Contract. The property owners who entered into the first contract (the Stegmeier residence) will save $1,777 this year the City will lose approximately $eb in revenue. The subject ~f this present contract, the Warren/Thorpe House, was designated a landmark in October of 1987 and is clearly an important element of our cultural heritage and has been since the early 1890 s. The Warren, Thorpe, and Goerli tz families all lived in the house since rte construction and the current owner, Mr. Sena, has devoted many patient hours to restoring this historic home to it's farmer glory. Staff has met with Mr. Sena numerous times, visited the home, and has reviewed care Eu lly the proposed improvements and the contract and finds that in approving this contract we are meeting our objectives of providing incentives to owners truly concerned with preserving their landmarks. Brad 8611er City/Manner BB:AMH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Memorandum, August 22, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM „~, _. August 22, !989 "0: Mayor and Nembers of the City Council FROM: 3rad Sutler, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUB,;ECT: REPOR? ON THE MILLS ACT G~;UalO~ 1 ~ .. < ~, ~> i' a to ~ Z .., 19%% 9ACY,GROt1N0: In August 1988, the City Council distu55ed incentives for historic preservation and encouraged staff and the Historic Preservation Commission to move forward to provide as many reasonable incentives as possible to encourage designation and preservation of his Wric properties in the City. Since that time, the Cammiss ion and staff I:ave explored the details of many available incentives. Gne of the most promising is the Mills Act. The Mills Act is a State taw that enables an owner of a qualified historic building to enter into a contract with the City to preserve, maintain, and if necessary, reha biota to or restore their historic building. The contract runs for 10 years and is annually au tomaticaily renewed for an additional year unless cancelled. It requires that the assessor re-evaluate the property using a capitalization of income method rather than market value. The result is a substantial reduction in property tzxes for post- Proposition 13 qualified M sto ric properties. Landmark designation is sufficient to qualify a property. The Mills Act has been used only a few times in the State. A ma.lor reason is that the original version of the taw required annual public access through the property, but this requirement was deleted in 1986. New interest has been generated in the Mills Act recently and Raneho Cucamonga has been recognized as being on the leading edge of efforts to put it to use. lt. ANALYSIS: The fiscal impact of the lowered property Lazes will be felt mostly by the County. The attached example, (see Exhibit "8") which is not a definitive calculation but gives an idea of the kind of savings that owners can experience, shows that on a (225,000 home, the Ctty loses 584.00 per year in general fund Lazes, while the landmark owner saves 51998.00. (TO get a deH nitive calculation from the assessor's office, we will have to submit +n actual contract.) Staff's expectation is that one to two dozen contracts would be drawr, up over the nett tew years. Given an average loss to the City of S84 per year per contract, two dozen contracts would mean an annual ~t1oss to the general fund of 52,0!6, 7 1 MEHC TD C: 7Y CDL'NCIL RE: MILLS ALT August 22, 1989 Page 2 Balanced against that loss would be a gain to the City in terms of maintenance, rehabilitation, and revitalization of historic property. Mills Act contracts Provide a positive and tangible incentire~ to owners of potential landmarks who may be hesitant about designation. This information has been reviewed by Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Manager, and Jim Na rt, Administrative Serv i[e5 0f rec tor, why acknowledge the loss to the general fund, but see the benefits to the City of incentives far preservation. As pointed out in the attached material, one of the Dest aspects of the Mills Act is that it does not require the historical building to be on the National Register nor must it De a commercial enterprise. Modest local iandmarks can qualify. Also attached is a sample "Nisto ric Preserve tian Agreeaent" drawn up by our City Attorney's office. It contains ail the necessary Orovisivns required by law. A copy of the Mails Act arM Che applieatrlc section of the California Tax Cade is attached. iII. CONCLUSION: Staff will work with interested owners to set up Mil is Act contract agreements. In seeking out properties for contract agreements, staff wilt give first priority to potent tat landmarks identified in the historic resources survey as the City's most significant structures. A second criterion will be potential landmarks with defamed maintenance, where the tax savings could be put to good use in repairing the Structures. Staff believes that offering to enter into Miils Act contracts with property owners will be a good incentive for designation and preservation efforts because it brings a tangible benefit to owners. The money saved can 6e put to use to maintain and restore the landmark, wh1cA is a benefit to the entire coawunity, present and future. Should you have any quest tons regarding our efforts in this area, please feel free to ca 11 either Arlene Banks or myself. We will keep You posted on the success of this program. Res ully .t ~~_ Brad e City P anner BB:AB:ko ~~ MEMD `0 C:'Y CD'JNCI! RE: MILLS ACT August 22, 1989 Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Ezcerpt From April, 1989 California Preservation Foundation Newsletter Exhibit "B" - Economic Impact of the Mills Act - Ezhibit "L" - The Mills Act (California Gav ernment Lade Section 50280-10289) Exhibit "D" - California Revenue and Tax Lode Section 639-434.4 Exhibit "E" - Historic Property Preservation Agreement cc: Jack Lam Jerry Fu lwood Rick Gomez Jim Hart Arlene Banks Historic Preservation Commission 7 ~t CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE MII.LS ACT ARTICLE 12 HISTORICAL PROPERTY CONTRACTS (With notes - as presented to California Preservation Foundation Workshop) Section: 50280. Restriction of use of proputy; application of owner 50281.1. Qualified histatical plopaty 50281. Required provisions of connect 50281.1 Contract fee 50282. Renewal; nonrenewal; notice; protest; txotdation; effect 50284, Cancellation; grounds 50285. Cancellation; trotice; hearing 50286. Cancellation; fa; paytnetit 50287. Action m enforce connect; pama 50288. Acquisition of property by eminent domain; cancellation of contract; inapplicabl7ity m deoermmetion of value 50289. Annexation by city of property under contract tb county; rights and duties of 50290. C~arslilration with state mmmissitln Gty CounNl (or Board o/ Suparvlaon M unMcorpwitad aria/ may conrraef wnh owner to naubr ua o/ hbtorla proprty to Derry out tM purpoaa o/ rhh art/oN arM Sact/on 13a e1 Rwanw arM Tir Cody fro pnaarva gwll/lad hlator/al ProWrtYl• { 8g99. RwlAallw d ~ d Ireparb: p/arkdraa d atwr Upon Me applinaop d m owmr m the aaeBt of u otmr d apy gtua9d hitoeral propwly r daCtved m Seetiav fi029D.1, nw M9Mlatiro Eod7 of a city, mmry, m dry apd tottrriy may mvteaet rwttS t~~orrpm m pt m restrict the we d me DmDe'b m a aupnv •hirlt tM IeaYlatira you to arty apt ~utieN aommevetta witL BaeGav 489) d CAeFtar 8 d Part a d Diwbp I d tlw Qarcmoe ud 7Yaaupp cod.. 7[w aotraet alwti m.et rho roapinmeab d Saetbn 50781 and Wffi. (Amevded 69 8bb.1965, v 965, f 1.7.) Nlatartd Nah The IBT7 emeudmevt eobetituted °Arti~ Former { 6rT180, added by 8nta.1B72, c. cie LB (rnmmevciva adth 8ectlon ~3B1 of 1232. D~ '1878. [ 1, wu renumbered { ChaDt<r 3" for "Artlcie 7 Itvmmavely. 502782 cod amevded by Sttla.1878, c. with 3ectlov 11811 0( Chapter 5". 373, p. 1317, { 167. Fmms tiee Weet'e Califorvia Cade Forme, Govemmevt [Jbrary lurereaeu Health avd Evafrovmevt a~25.5161. C.J.B. Health avd Euvlrovmevt }{ 81 at cep., 116 et aep. 11aAllarla P a~vaa at~aalN b w1 r aMaaMla qtr aayrypl e 77 4 50280.t. QrWilled historical property "Qualified hietorital property" far Purposes of this article, tneam Privately owned property which u not exempt from property tantion and which meet eiNer of N< following: (a) I,iated m the National Register o[ Hiamtic Placer ar bated m s rtgiatercd humrie dutriet, ae defined in Section 1.191-2(b) of 75ue 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Lacel city teglster IS ~ NI Listed in any stare, city, munty, or rity and rounry official rcgmrer of huWrrd or uchitectur- sufflNant to ally significant cites, pisses, or Wrdmuks. be quelllled. (Added by Stah.19&5, c. 9t65. 4 2J 4 50481. Requued provtsioru of mnuact Mlnlmum 10 r `i • ,tpy rontraet entered into under this article shall contain the tolbwing pmvieiom: yea s. (a) The term of Ne mntraet ehnll be for • minimum period of ~ year. Contlacf Can Ib) Where appliable. the mvtnet shall provide the tolloWmr. spacily pea- y (11 Far the preservation of the qualified hiaforiml pmpery and when necessuy, m restore and seNatlon, rchabilitak the Droperty W mntarm m the rules and reguLtiova of the OfLre of Hubris Prcaerva- - taaforatlcn, tbo of the /T apartment of Puke .ad Aecreafion. rehab. Al/aw exam- ~ j2j Far the periodic examhut4oru of Ne interior and exterior of the premises by the assessor, the fnaflona fo D<partmev[ of Part and Recreatiov, and the State Hood of Fqualiration ae may be n<cneary to determine coin- determrne t1w owner's mmpliavice wiN rtes mvtract pJlanro Wlth ~9 For it to be binding upon, ud enure to the benefit at, all successor m interest of the owo<r. A confrsct. auceasor k mtercas ahdi have the acme righb avd obligatkru under Ne mniraet u the original T OWnIr Who ellreRd mt0 the mntra<L Contract remains (Amended Dy 9hte.1886, a 965, 4 9J !n elfect open change o/ Hutonal Note oWnelahip. Former 1 50231, added by Steu.1B72, c. 50: 9.9 avd emended by Stata.1878, c. 123'1, tr. :370, 1 1, was rcoumbered g 3i3, p~ 3318, 4153. Fee may be 1 60g81.1, Contract fee required (but y 't'he Iei4uutive body evkring ivm a mntraM deecnbed N thin artiek may require Wt the property not races- owner, ae • mvditiop to entering into the contract, pay • fa not to exceed the rcawn.bk cst of s+rlly imposed). adminukring Nis program, (Added by Stt4.1986, e. 985, 4 l) Always f0 years 1 60g8f. Reaewab rronsewewd: aofl<K pralsk r«ordatloa: eRSt Iron explraflon.~ p) Each mvtraet a1Wl Droride that on tM anaiveraary date of the mnteut or wch other anvwl Annualty• + year dace u u aptaified in the mvlract, a yea dull be added av[onutiwlly to ore initial term of uw b added fa the contract arks notice of mnrcuewal u given u provided in thin section. if the property owner or term unless a the kguktive body desva in aaq year not b renew the mvfract, flat party atoll sent writtep written notlt% al nom of nnlVeneMel OL tll! mntlaet oa th! nthN party Ip adVana Ot Ne aan WI rcnawal date Ot N< nanraneWal /a mntnet UnkY the entire k nerved by the owner at kuL N days prior W tM rcwwal date or by served. urn kgulative ~t )wt 80 days prior to the rcllewal dote. one year a1W1 turamatinlly be added to the term of ore mntxact Owner Gn pto-~ N) Upov teagpt by the owner of • notice hom ate kgklative body of novrcaewal, the owner may ' Nat CounCll he bgulative body maY, at any ante Prior to make a written protest of uu notice of mnreaewal. 7 relleWal. Ne rcvewal date, wiNdnw the notice rat ponrcwwal, Gncllbd eon- lcl ff the kgiakore body a u,e owner seers nonce of intent m any year vot. b rarrew urn ~mvtract, the eriadog mvtra<t s1ull ramam ur eHeet for the Wlance of arc period rcmaiahrg tinrc Wes ftlCf I~maNa In original exemuop or the Wt rooewal of t!x mntnet, u the ate may be. eNeef tot bIl- (dl The owner shall turvish flu kgnlauve body wiN ~~ mtoevutb0 ' ' ' tlK kgu4tke body Idea of period. shall rcquve in order fa enabk it b determine the eligrlility of the property invalred. Clfy Cfark ~ fel Na 4ter than 20 days otter • city or munty enters into s mntrcet wiN an owner Panuant b ud. click, tlw ekrk o[ Ne kquktive body .lull record wIN Ne munty eecorder • mp- of uK ryeorda Wlth fO°~t' whkh shall deambe Ne property subject theeeto ' ' From seed after the lime of the Count Recorder Y rtcordation` mntru/ shall unpan ~ entire uwrea! to all persona u re af/oeded by uk reeordwg wleMn 10 days kws of rids auk. of eanfrect• (,fie°yd by Stau.1986, a 9g6, 4 5.) Council may ~ d So29/ r+vveaatloq Qwtads csnu/ If con- conbact Is breeehed pro- 171e leguletive body clay raceel a eovtract S it de4rmmee that tM owner 6u bRaehed evy of the rollditivm of the contract provided [or iv tide a[tiele or hae albw d th r party /s nag- e e propeetp w de[erionte w me point neat it no bnger meets the ehvderde for a qualified hbwrital pRperty • • The kgielative Ismail Ol not , ~''mY ciao tanRl a contract H IL determinea that the owmr hu (creed w Rawre o[ Rhabditafe H' property m the manner apemrxd m the c t t rehabbed sa agreed. on ne Umevded by State.1985, a 965, y 7.1 Pub IM Msrlny ~ § 5028$. Cancellation; notice; hearing to unnl con- No contract shall be ranceled under Section 502&4 until after the tract legislative body has given notice of, and has held, a public hearing on the matter. Notice of the hearing shall be mailed to the last (mown address of each owner of property within the historic zone and shall be published pursuant to Section 6061. (Added by 3tafa.1972, c. 1442, p. 3181, § 1.) Cancellation --~ § $0286, CasceWtlon; tee; payment because of breach of I[ a centlaM fs canceled under Section 50284, the owner shall unvaet means PaY a cancellation fee of 12yZ percent of the full value of the proper- payrunt by ty at the time o[ tmrlcellation, as determined by the eoulity assessor owner oI 72-r/2% without regard to any restriction on such property imposed pursuant o/ luu v~/ye at time of unul• to this article. The cancellation fee shall be paid to the Controller, at latlon. such time and in such manner as the Controller shell prescribe and , shall be deposited In the State General blind. (Added by StatA.1972, a 1442, p. 3161, § 1. Amended by Sfafa.1978, c. 1207, p. 3874, § 6, operative 7aa. 1, 1981.) buetoneu Hots The 1979 ameedmeot chevead the eev~ cenetioe (ee from SU cercevt of the u- neesed value ro 12 bti pereeet o{ the full vnlue. Opmdve date, eppllcatiov to 18812 [iarsl year evil /iced years thereetteq avd lerislative ivtmt iv postpovemevt of ocer- etive dote at 6teta.1978, e. 12m, p. 3972, e<e Hietnrical Sote uvder Fdue,Q 5 11. 1979 emevdmevt of thu seetiov ivoper alive uvleas 3eoste Covet. Ameed. So. a0, 1877-t8 is approved by the voters. became opentivc Lv. 1, 1B8t, a S.CA. So. 60 was approved et the npeclal etetewide elee[iov bald \ov. 8, IB78, see Hletorled 5ote uvder Fdneetioo Code { ll. Council or a --) § $0287. Actloa to entoroe contract; parties landowner may brlnD action in qs an alternative to cancellation of the rnntraM for bleach of court to enloru any condition, the county. city, or any landowner may bring any ac- contract. Lion in rnurt necessary to enforce a contraM including, but not limit• ed to, an aMion to enforce the contraM by specific performance or In- junction. (Added Ay State.1972, c. 14d2, D• 3161, § lj ~9 § SO2HH. Acgttisitloa of property by eminent domain; esacaua- tlon of contract; inapplicability to determination of value In the event that property subject to contract under this article is acquired in whole or in part by eminent domain or other acquisi- 'No bnech of lion by any entity authorized to exercise the power of eminent do- eontnee Iw 11 ,-•~ main, and the acquisition is determined by the legislative body to property ecqulred frustrate the purpose of the contract, such contract shall be canceled ~by eminenf dams/n. Value and no fee shall be imposed under Section 50:RC+. Such contract shall of property w be deemed null and void for all purposes of determining the value of •ecqulrW /e not the property so acquired. d~termined by ~fhe conlrscG (Added by Sffita.1972, c. 1442, p. 3181, § 1. Amended by Stata.1974, c. 649, p. 1262, § 19.) IMtorirel Nw RTe IB74 emeodmevt emevded tM eer [iov without eMVae. IArary Rdereocta Emiaot Domeiu aC+17. C.l.s. Emivent Domeiv 164. In ennered § X289. AmexittloR bq dty of property twtler nontrect fo cotm- er~ee, clUu ty; rishb aRd datlee of dty InherM con- tracts made In the event that property restricted by a contract with a cotmty wltn county. under this amide is annexed to a city, the city shall sutxeed to aU rights, duties, and powers of the county trader such contract, (Added by StaU.1972 c. 1442, p. 3161, § 1.) Stab Hleforkel § ~• CO^•ei~Oe tit ~e m~ Resources I.od a9evewa and ottoen of 9valified vwwrtia may mrouh wiN the Sew 9Ytorid Commhelon ~ Ruontvea Comvveaiov • • for ifs adrite avd couveel cot outran nleraot to hiatmical Droparef edvbu. metracu. (Avteaded b7 9tata.1986, e. 986, i 8-) Ilbrary Reteeeecn Aedth eod F.ovleovmevt'G+•27.5. Ha to 90, 9!, 101, 110, 116 to 128, C.1.9. HeeLh eod Evdrovmav[ !1 81 ro 128, 129, 132, 133, 136, 187 to 140, 88, 80, 71 to 79, 78 to 80, 82 to 88, 142, 149 to 163. S~ § 437 PROPERTY TAXATION-ASSES.CMENT Div. 1 amounu by a factor of 100 and dividing the product by the secured tax rate for the prior year. (Added by Suts.1976, c. 176, p. 320, § ll, eff. May 24, 1976. Amended by Stats.1977, c. 853, p. 2575, § 18.5, eff. Sept. 17, 1977; Suts.1980, c. 1208, P• 4083, 4 77; Suts.1984, c. 678, § 23.) itutorlnl Nou The 1977 and 1950 amendments in the first The 1964 amendment, at the end of the fire paragaph made cdtanees in a rcfercnce to a paragraph, deleted "and dinributed pursuant section 3o the Revenue and Twtion Code. to Section 38906 of the Revenue and Twtion Applirstion of provisions of Sutz1977, c. Code" and in the aecoad pamBaph following 553, p. 2557, to all activities undenakrn purau~ "Crovetnmrnt Code" deleted and distributed mt a Suts1976, c. 176, p. 243, see note under ptuauant to Section 36905 of the Revenue and Gov.C. § 51100. Twtlon Code". Goan Rafesaaaw Average amual assessed value anribuubk to timber, see Government Code § 27123. tabna'S' Hdafaaroa Twtion a.}I7. CJS. Twtion § 410. Artlde 1.9 HISTORICAL PROPERTY SecHoa 439. Enforceably restricted property. 439.1. Restricted historical properly, 439.2. Valuation; capitalixpUon of income method; determination. 439.3. Notice of nonrenewal of wntract; valuation. 439.4. Recordation of enforaabk restridion prior to Tien date. ARiele I.9 war added by Stats.1977, a 1040, p. 3153, § 4. § 439. Eoforseabfy restricted property For the purposes of this article and within the meaning of Section B of Article XIII of the Constitution, property is "enforccably restricted" if it is subject to rm historical property contract executed pursuant to Article 12 (commencing with Section 50280) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Tide 5 of the Government Ctxte. (Added by Suu.1977, c. 1010, p. 3153, § 4J [Ibeavy Rafatrmw. Health and Environment 423.5. CJS. Health and Environment § 61 et seq. Sure and Local Twtion, IJnq § 114. § 439.1. RaMeted historical property For purposes of this article "restricted historical property" means qualified historical property, as defined in Section SU280.1 of the Government Code, 398 ~ ~TORICAL PROPERTY § 439.2 which is subject [o a historical property contract executed pursuant to Article 12 (commencing with Section 50260) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division ] of Title 5 of the Government Code. (Added by Stats.1977, <. 1040, p. 3153. § 4. Amended he Stats.1965, c. 965, § 9J HLtarlul Note The 1985 amendment substituted "az defined (commencing with Section 5031) e( Chapter 1 in Section 50280.1 of the GOVCrnmem Code" of Division 5 of the Public Resources Code"; for "meeting the requirements of .Miele 3 and made a grammatical change. § 439.2. Valuation; capitalization of Income method; determination When valuing enforceably restricted historical property, the county assessor shall not consider sales data on similar property, whether or not enforceably restricted, and shall value such restricted historical property by the capitalva- tion of income method in the following manner: (a) The annual income to be capitalized shall be determined as follows: (1) Where sufficient rental information is available, the income shalt be the fair rent which can be imputed to the restricted historical property being valued based upon rent actually received for the property by the owner and upon typical rentals received in the area for similar property in similar use where the owner pays the property tax, When the restricted historical grope: ty being valued is actually encumbered by a lease, any czsh rent or its equivalent considered in determining the fair rent of the property shall be the amount for which the property would be expected to rent were the rental payment to be renegotiated in the light of current conditions, including applicable prov~sicns under which the property is enforceably restricted. (2) Where sufficient rental information is not available, the income shall be that which the restricted historical property being valued reasonably can be expected to yield under prudent management and subject to applicable provi- sions under which the property is enforeeably restricted. (3) If the parties to an instrument which cnforceably resVicts the property stipulate therein an amount which constitutes [he minimum annual income to be capitalized, then the income to be capitalized shall not be less than the amount so stipulated. Eor purposes of this section income shall be determined ir. accordance with roles and regulations issued by the board and vmh this section and shall be the difference between revenue and expenditures. Revenue shalt be the amount of money or money's worth, including any cash rent or its equivalent, which the property can be expected to yield to an ownerwperator annually on the average from any use of the property permitted under the terms by which the property is enforceably restricted. - Expenditures shall be any outlay or average annual allocation of money or money's worth that can be fairly charged against the revenue expected to be received during the period used in computing such revenue. Those expendi- tures to be charged against revenue shall be only those which are ordinary and necessary in the production and maintenance of the revenue for that cX ` 399 § 439.2 PROPERTY TAXATION-ASSESSMENT Dlv. 1 period. Expenditures shall not include depletion charges, debt retirement, interest on funds invested in the property, property taxes, corporation income taxes, or corporation franchix taxes based on income. (b) The capitalization rate to be used in valuing owner-occupied single (amity dwellings pursuant to this article shall not be derived from sales data and shall be the sum of the following components: (1) An interest component to be determined by the board and announced no later thae September I of the year preceding the assessment year and which was the yield rate equal to the effective rate on conventional mortgages as determined by the Federal Home iAan Bank Board, rounded to the near- est '/. percent. (2) An historical property risk component of 4 percent. (3) A component for property taxes which shall be a percentage equal to the estimated total tax rate applicable to the property for the assessment year times the assessment ratio. (4) A component for amortization of the improvements which shall be a percentage equivalent to the reciprocal of the remaining life. (c) The capitalization rate to be used in valuing all other restricted histori- cal property pursuant to this article shall not be derived from sales data and shall be the sum of the following components: (1) An interest component to be determined by the board and announced no later than September 1 of the year preceding tha assessment year and which was the yield rate equal to the effective rate on conventional mortgages as determined by the Federal Home Loan Hank Hoard, rounded to the near- est '/. Irerant. (2) An historical property risk component of 2 percent. (3) A component for property taxes which shall be a percentage equal to the estimated total tax rate applicable to the property for the assessment year times the assessment ratio. (4) A component for amortization of the improvements which shall be a percentage equivalent to the reciprocal of the remaining life. (d) The value of the restricted historical property shat{ be the quotient of the income determined as provided in subdivision (a) divided by the capitali- zation rate determined as provided in subdivision (b) or (c). (e) The ratio prescribed in Section 401 shall be applied to the value of the property determined in subdivision (d) to obtain its assessed value. (Added by Statc1977, c. 2040, p. 3153, § 4. Amended by Slats 1984, c. 678, g 24.) tWtorkal Note Th< 1984 amendment dcltted, hom the in~ of surveys requirsd by &ction IBIS of this troducmry paralVaph. "the bond (or purposes code and" preceding "the county assessor". Llbnry Refinear Sgte and Local Taxation, lane, § 719. HISTORICAL PROPERTY § 434.4 Pt 2 § 439.3. Notice of nonrenewal of coaaraM; valuation Notwithstanding any provision of Section 439.2 to the contrary, if either the county or city or the owner of restricted historical property subject to contract has served notice of nonrenewal as provided in Section 50282 of the Government Code, the county assessor shall value such restricted historica] property as provided in this section. (a) Following the hearing conducted pursuant to Section 50285 of the Government Code, subdivision (b) shall apply until the termination of the period for which the restricted historical property is enforceably restricted. (b) The board or assessor in each year until the termination of the period for which the property is enforceably restricted shall: (1) Determine the full cash value of [he property as if it were not subject to an enforceable restriction; (2) Determine the value of the property by the capitaliration of income method as provided in Section 439.2 and without regard to the fact that a notice of nonrenewal or rancellation has occurred; (3) Subtract the value determined in paragraph (2) of this subdivision by rapitalization of income from the full cash value determined in paragraph (1) of this subdivision; (4) Using the rate announced by the board pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 439.2, discount the amount obtained in paragraph (3) of this subdivision for the number of years remaining until the termi- nation of the period for which the property is enforceably restricted; (5) Determine the value of the property by adding the value determined by the capitalization of income method as provided in paaagraph (2) of this subdivision and the value obtained in paragraph (4) of this subdivision; and (1S) Apply the ratios prescribed in Section 401 to the value of the property determined in paragraph (5) of this subdivision to obtain its asstssed value. (Added by Stats.l977, c. 1040, p, 3155, § 4. Amended by Stats.1984, a 67B, § 25.) F[INOrlral Nole The 1984 amendment deleted, from the in- poses of sairv<ys required in Section IBIS. and" troductory paragraph, ", the board, for pur preceding "the county asseswr". § 439.4. Recordattou of enforceable restrletloo prior to Ilan date No property shall be valued pursuant to this article unless an enforceable restriction meeting the requirements of Section 439 is signed, accepted and recorded on or before the lien date for the fiscal year in which the valuation would apply. (Added by Stats.1977, c. 1040, p. 3156, § 4.) eaacm~is ~~ 401 ----CITY OF RAtiCHO CLiCAMOIVGA `-~ STAFF REPORT ~,~, '~, DATE: October 7, 1992 ' j~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~1~ ,; Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROi{: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WATTSOtJ ARNO CDMPANY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE ACQUISITION OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RECOMI~NDATION R ec ortonend acceptance of agreement between the Wattson Arno Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the acquisition of off-site property located at the northeast and northwest corners of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard- BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject right-of-way was to be acqui rod by the Wattson Arno Company as a condition of approval of their development, after a reasonable attempt per California Government Code Section 65462.5. it is now Lhe responsibility of the City to either acquire the needed land or accept the project without the additional improvements. The Wattson-R rno Company has attempted unsuccessfully to obtain the needed right-of-way on the north side of Foothill for several months. Although negotiations are continuing, staff reconm~ends the City move forward to acquire the needed right-of-way on the north side of Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue. The area needed is for the installation of a signal in the final designed locations. The attached agreement provides for the Wattson-Arno Company to place a $15,000 deposit with the City for acquisition of right-of-way appraisals and escrow costs. The agreement also requires Wattson-Arno to place on deposit with Lhe City the full app rased value upon completion of the appraisal services. The City will then make an offer Lo the owners Lo purchase the right-of-way. Respectfully submi,tte.d, '~~~zE~ William J. O'Neil ~-~ City Engineer WJ O:MO:Iy Attachment. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and the Member of City Council Jack Lam, AICp, City Manager ~y FROM: Jerry Fulwood, Ac*_inq Community Services fi' Director / By: Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent ~; SUBJECT: APPLICATZON TO USE ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL FOR RECREATION CLASSES RECOMMENDATION The City Council sign an Agreement between the High School District and the City for use of the cafeteria at Alta Loma High School for recreation classes and activities. BACKGROUND This Agreement, as in the past, has no rental fee required only a purchase of one case of paper towels and one case of toilet tissue to be used by the school at tha adjoining restroom facilities. The coat of these ^ustodial supplies are included in class fees and are paid out of the 13 Recreation Fund. Re$pectfully submitted, IJ i L// ~erry Fulwood Acting Community services Director JF: KS:tp Attachment l~ ~~ h C 1-I O C C C .1 ~1 C~ V C t~ September 3, 1992 Julie Houser Aedviecs Office, ALHS R8R0 Baseline Rd. Rawho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Julie: F'or the past uveml years, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Cotnmuniry Servi¢s Depammem has been using the cafeteria at AI-HS for youth arM adult classes Nrovghout the year. We would like to continue ~o provide clacscs' at your facility for 199293. ListW below is a schedule of dates and tunes for use. 1 would appreciate it i(you could reserve the cafeteria for us during rhea times, aml notlfy me of any possible conflict. Class darts are as follows: FALL .SFCSION 1992 SPRINO SFSgiON 1993 - TueNays 929 - 1123 5;45-IO:OfJpm - Tueadars 4/13 ~ Rte 5:45-IO:OOpm -Wednesdays 923-17A 3:45~8:Sipm -Wednesdays 4/14-6A 3:45-B:45pm (off Il/lli WINTER SESSION 1991 SI!NMFR SESSION 1991 -Tuesdays i/19-323 5:45.10:00prn -Tuesdays (/19-824 5:35-10:rppm -Wednesdays 120.324 3:45-8:45pm -Wednesdays CJ30-R25 3:45-8:45pm The ALHS actisdries office steR and custodial sniff have always beer. very helpful aM cauteous to us, atM we appreciate the opponwity m provide rmm pmgmms m the public through the uu of your facility. Thank you, acid please call rm at 980.3145 if you have any quesdmts. Respectfully, ,~!' ~•. .~ tee ~j;~~ ~ ~Janic Lynch RecrcaGOn CooNinator cc: Jerry Pulwood, Acing Community Services Dvenor Kathy Sm<nun, Recreation Stryennttnd<m Dean Smrnhers. Superintcndem of Schools .411en Mavens. ALHS Principal . ,.. ~ .. `... ncn9o, ur ~ ~ s ,,, c~~,emc„,....~. .... ,- ~~~[ S7 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT "°°°°`I°° "°' Date_~., 19_92 APPLICATION AND PE RMI7 FOR USE OF SCIIOOL FACILITIES ~ 3228 Narore Gr Type Name of Oraanizatlon_.City~ fRarsrhn L7v~arrn __ .~._ of Urganization_._$~y'P~$bQ[I- Authorized Name T~niP LVnG}I ~Tte_ COOLY11IIatOI RepresentaLVe of Organisation Address 10500 Q4c Center Dr.. Etancho Cl3c~nmaa. (A 91730 phone No. 980-3145 stmel any zip uee LIADI LITV AND HOLD HA RM LE55 AGR EEf.1ENT Applicant hereby agrees to be responsible for any damages sustained by any land, buildings, furniture or equipment because o! the o<nJpaecy of ;he premises. ft is fu"her agreed that ali applicable rules, regulations and policies of the school district governing board will be adhered to as wen as enforced. Applicant `urrher agrees m indemnify and save harmless the ChaHey Joint Union High School District, its officers and emplpyees from antl agar nst any liabilities imppsetl upon said school disbict whidJ result as a consequence to the performanrx of this agreement. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE'S S/GNA High School Budding Requested__._.B.1.t3.i^°~ Hi qh crtv~~___ ur Faality_~Q.terla Purpose or i Nature of Vse ~f1Oe Classes Anticipated Nn. '' '~ Wi!I admisswn lees be charged or Ves ^ Will meeting or use be nonexclusive Ves ^ of Attendance I I collections or donations accep[ed> No ^ and open to public? No ^ Net proceeds to be used for_ _._~ __, _____ _ Datel s) and Timelsl Requested'. V T Sketch of seating or stage arrangement desired'. Date __ Hrs. !rom -- - M ro -~-- M r Date. _-__. Hrs. from -_- _ M to -_-.__ i v M Date ._ _._H Ors. hom __ . M lo_-__ _ M ~ - - -- - -- Date .-_- Hrs. from _-- __ M to_-~_ -. M~ Dates subject to change re: our Regalar Week lv Irr Mon(hIV Meetlno -__.___, - _ __ i SpOZ'YS Bdngnet5. 9egmmng Date_Q(23/97___Endmg Cate_._8/ZSL9.3-. ___ j Requests for Speelal Egwpmem ^ Posers ^ Chavt ^ piano _. P. A, System ^ Flags ^ Lectern _. Projection Equipment ^ Table< ^ Other Requests for fafelena Uses Use for meetirg purposes? Yes ^ No ^ Arc refreshments tc be servetlz Yas ^ No ^ $pprial School 3 -s Personnel Requesed Rental Fee $ __ _ Salary $ . Jther $ TOTAL $ ~N/A Certificate of Insraltce Required Tues., 9/29 - 11/24 5:45-10:00 7?p Wed., 9/23 - 12/9 3:45-8=45 pm off 11(11 Tues., 1/19 - 3/23 5:45-10:00 pn Wed., 1(20 - 3/24 3:45- 8:45 pn Tues., 4/13 - 6/8 5:45-10:00 pn Wed., 4/14 - 6j9 3:-05-8:45 F*P -~--s- Auditorium._~-.- Library ._.-.__ Cdfetena_- Gy iu Exempt ^ " APPrpvetl by _ _ _ a [roPI o~ awresanlatTve r nh. °pprrved dun to ._ ______. __~ Dart Paid .. ,79 iiOTl:; HPnlal Ipe nUrl bP p, rtl AP bOUri r }JVdnCI. Nn Irrr!bnr ~~~ writ be angernU + e[1 1 aEtlltlnnsl c arges 1~, rnrl M.r4n C~Pv1$[Vau r0 Cnallnv JC!nl rrutVnlVnta Hlgn ScnnUi'pulrrq }no fens to atonal n rnq uSPa y/pge- Sebool Or0[e GnoY VEIIpW - [riSlntl'a C'OJy Oink ~" WOrN Coq• Dial. Zd I+/!91 GolaenrVC - Slupenf 5ln[P Copy O,Pan- rlppncaQnt's Ceov . ._ _.. ... -_.__ ~V ..._. .. _.._._ p,inpoal nr Peplesent}Irvx -~_ urfz ur xalvctlu uuGnMUnun STAFF REPORT DATE: October 7, 1992 'R7 Mayor and Mcmbcrs of the Cily Council lack l.am. AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager ,:' _ SU6JECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITN EMPIRE ECONOMICS TO CONDUCT A MARKET ABSORPTION STUDY OF CFD 88-2 RFCONMFNU `TION It is recommended that the City Counril approve a professional sen~ices agreement for an amount not to exceed $4,500 to perform a market absorption study n( Community Facilities District (CFD) BB-2. This agreement is u> be fundeJ from account 75-4130-6028 and will not affect the general fund. It is necessary to have a current market ahsorption study of this District prior .o selling bonds Io cover the costs n( the drainage facilities that have been built. A nmrket absorption study is necessary because under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act, the security (or the bonds is the land in the District. Since the last market absorption study was completed a number of unexpected delays have occurred. Thcsc delays have caused the old market absorption study to become dated and no longer useful for purposes of selling and m arkcting bonds. For the above reasons it is necessary to have a new market absorption study done. This market absorption study will he completed by November and wi!I provide an updated opinion of the markcl absorption of homes built in this District The cost of this study is being paid for out of the special taxes that developers have been paying into this District for the past four years. This study cost will nM have an impact on the general fund. The cost far this markcl absorption study will not exceed $4,500. JRc~spccwtfu~lly Submiucd, Duane A. Baker Assistant m the City Managcr DAB/dab 89 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~~. DATE: October 7, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager/Acting ~''ql~~/ /' Community Services Director BY: Dave Moore, Recreation Supervisor`ti~ SUBJECT: SOCCER OFFICIATING AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council sign the attached soccer officiating agreement. BACKGROUND Two years ago the City of Rancho Cucamonga began an adult soccer league. This had began due to residents complaining about poor officiating ir. their current non-profit league. The Park and Recreation Commission approved staff's recommendation to provide a program that would include a higher caliber of referees. During the City's first year the quality of referees improved greatly. However, as time went on the number of teams and quality of play increased and our sources of quality officials began to decrease. ANALYSIS Entering into an agreement with Inland Empire Soccer Referees Association will enable us to provide a three man referee system peY game with a crew of more then &0 quality officials to draw from. This ensures a safer and higher quality game at almost the same cost of the old two man system. By formalizing our agreement with a contract it protects the City of Rancho Cucamonga from liability and payment responsibilities. It also relieves staff o£ the task of seeking, scheduling and paying individual officials. Thereby improving efficiency. The City Attorney has reviewed this contract. 9c~ SOCCER OFFICIATING AGREEMENT October 7, 1992 Page 2 The contract agreement stipulates Inland Empire Soccer Referees Association to provide three officials per game at a cost of $60.00 per game plus a $5.00 per game assignment Pee. The Association will schedule all o£ its officials. Inland Empire Soccer Referees Association will bill us $65.00 per game monthly after their services have been rendered. This amount will be paid entirely out of registration fees. The contract shall commence on October 25, 1992 and continue upon mutual agreement. CONCLUSIO 'Po maintain a quality and safe recreation adult soccer league, it is recommended that City Council approve the contracted agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Inland Empire Soccer Referees Association. Respectfully submitt`e_9~ , od rry Fulwo D puty City Manager/ Acting Community Services Director JF:DM: tp Attachment ~( SOCCER OFFICIATING AGREEMENT Tfeil ember CEMENT made and entered into this 2~_ day of , 1992 , by and between the CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREES ASSOCIATION, an athletic officials organization, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR". WITFQiESSETH; WHEREAS, the CITY does desire to secure the services of an athletic officials organization to provide certain services for and on behalf cf the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Community Services Department; and WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR has submitted a proposal to perform such services, the terms and conditions of which are satisfactory to CZTY. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of mutual promises, covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties agree as follows: I. CONTRACTOR SHALL: 1. Makes all athletic officials assignments for all adult soccer leagues and soccer tournaments as set forth by playing schedules established and provided by the community services Department. 2. Provide a diagonal system of refereeing that will include one referee and two (2) linesmen. 3. Notify all assigned athletic officials of game cancellations, as the result of bad weather, poor field conditions, mechanical failure, or changes in playing schedule. 4. Provide regular training for all athletic officials, to ensure qualified officials, update officials of rule changes and league procedures. 5. Conduct an on site evaluation oP each official. 6. Assist in deliberating the out come of protested games, ejections, or appeals. 7. Require standard uniformity of dress for all athletic officials. 8. Submit monthly billing statements to include referee Pees and assignment fear after services era rendered. 9. Rotate all of £icials, in order that teams do rot have the same official Por any more than two (2) weeks in succession. 9a 10. Attend any league organization meetings and team classification procedures conducted by the CITY. 11. Provide each referee a copy of the CITY's League Rules prior to any league game regardless hcw frequently or infrequently they may be scheduled. This also applies to tournaments and tournament rules. 12. Provide an answering machine so the City can efficiently notify contractor of cancellations or changes. IZ. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Provide CONTRACTOR information on leagues with dates, times, and locations 15 days prior to league start date. 2. Provide CONTRACTOR league playing schedules seven (7} days in advance of the first game of each season. 3. Provide staff at each park site that will represent the city's league and handle all on site related administrative matters. 4. Notify CONTRACTOR of any cancelled games by 7:00 a.m. in the event of bad weather or poor field conditions. 5. Provide to the CONTRACTOR copies of league rules, maps, and schedules for distribution to their athletic officials. 6. process monthly payment, according to CONTRACTOR'S monthly statement and mail payment within 70 days of receiving CONTRACTOR'S statement. III. CONTRACTORS FEES: 1. Game fee is 560.00 per game for the Diagonal System, including club L en men. 2. Assignment/Administrative fees are 55.00 per game. 3. Game cancellations and/ar game Por£eitures that occur without providing the CONTRACTOR proper notification as identified below shall be charged to the CITY and consist of one full referee game fee plus double the assigner/administration Pee. a. Cancelled games due to reasons other than poor weather or poor field conditions require 72 hours prior notification to the CONTRACTOR. b. CITY is to notify CONTRACTOR of any cancelled games by 7:00 a.m. in the event of bad whether or poor field conditions. 9~ All playing rules shall be governed by The Federal International De Football Association (F.I.F.A.). However, the cITY's "League Rules" and it's exceptions will take priority over the F.I. F.A. adult soccer rules. IV. CONTRACTCR shall commence on October 25 199? and continue upon mutual agreement. v. Indemnity Clause: CONTRACTOR hereby releases and agrees to indemnity an3 hold harmless CITY, it's officers, agents, employees, and representatives for damage to property of or injury to or death of any arising out of or encountered in connection with this agreement or the prosecution of work under it, whether such claims, demands, actions, or liability are caused by CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR'S agenta or employees, excepting only such injury, death, or damages as may be caused coley and exclusively by CITY. VI. Independent Contractor: CONTRACTOR is, and shall be deemed to be, an independent agent of CITY. VII. CONTRACTOR hereby releases and agrees to or accept liability indemnity an3 hold harmless CITY, it's officers, agenta, employees, and representatives Por any wages due to CONTRACTOR'e nthletic officials once CITY has submitted payment for said services. Said officials are not and shall not be considered City employees for any purpose or reason whatsoever. ~~ VIII. This agreement may be terminated by either party hereto at any lima by giving thirty (00; days written notice to: CITY: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Sports Office ar CONTRACTOR: John C. Bennyworth, IESPA President 8545 Yearling Way Riverside, CA 92509-5120 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective parties thereinto authorized as of the day and year first above writt By: _ a d ~. City Signature o n C. Bennywor,4t IESRA President Mailing addresses: City of Rancho Cucamonga John C. Bennyworth Community Services Department ZESRA President Post Office Box 807 8545 Yearling Way Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Riverside, CA 92509-5120 Attn: Sports Office Reviewed by City Attorney - 9/92 9~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA __ STAFF REPORT ~~ ~ DATE: October 7, 1992 ~ ,l i 70: Mayor and Members of the City Counc ll Jack Lam, AI W, City Manager FROM: Will tam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12959-1, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NHITE OAK AV"tNUE AND ARROW ROUTE, SUBMITTED BY CRPELLINO AND ASSOCIATES RECO!l~NDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 12959-1, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City C1 erk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSISBACKGROIIN0 Tentative Parcel Map 12959, located on the southeast ccrner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route was approved by the Planning Commission on January 8, 1992, for the purpose of subdividing 51.8 acres into 22 parcels. The project will be phased, with Parcel Map 12959-1, being Phase I, consisting of 22,57 acres being subdivided into 15 parcels bounded by Arrow Route, White Oak Avenue, Tacoma Drive and Oakwood Place. The Oevel oper, Capell ino and Associates, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E1,563,159.94 Labor and Material Bond: 5 781,579.48 Monumen tation: E 3,150.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENT PM 12959 CAPEL~INO AND ASSOCIATES October 7, 1992 Page 2 All requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map have been met. Copies of the agreement and security, and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~~CJ~c Wilitam J. O'Neii.~~ City Engineer WJO:JD:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NC. ~a-~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 12959- 1 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 12959), IMPROVEMENT AG P.EEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 12959, submitted by Capellino and Associates, located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, being a division of 51.8 acres subdivided into 22 parcels was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on January 8, 1992; and WHEREAS, Pa rc ei Map 12959-1 is Phase I of same Tentative Parcel Map 12959 consisting of 22.57 acres subdivided into 15 parcels; and WHEREAS, Parcel IAap No. 12959-1 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map 6y the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Capellino and Associates, as d_wel oper. NOd, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Cf ty Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 12959-1 6e and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be f11 ed for record. (~ RESOL'!TION N0. 9a.a~~{ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12959-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previ ousty formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No, 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenancz District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the amlexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at thts time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance 0l strict; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property wtthln the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have fit ed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HE P,EHY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the evy of all assessments, shall be apps icabie to the territory annexeA hereunder. 99 / na a~. ~v; 1 i r____ __- i it I Ili ~ I li I ~ z i I I`F I ~/ _ _ i ~, I ~ ~ __~-~' F, i ~ ~ .-~ ~~ 3 ~ f- 'III _ SHEET INJEX hfAP ~ ~,,. ^__ _ _~ ~ I i \\ ^` \ \, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: ENGWEERING DIVISION r- rITt.E: r'M 129 9- I ~~Y EXHi81T: ~(^ ~~ 4ti ~ POVTE V/C/N/TY MAP EXHIBIT "B" N0. OF O.U.: N/A AREA 18.27 dr_ PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 12959-1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Assess No. of Lam s to be Annexed District No. Units 58W~-45IIOL T6PCOD-- 1 36.54 --- 10 --- 3 --- 6 36.54 9 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Assess Street District No. Units Name s8 IA .27 Arrow Rte. White Oak Tacoma Dr. Oak P1 . JD:30/i/92 Community turf Ground Cover Trees Equest.Traii Sg, ft• Sq, ft. Ea. --' __- --- 54 4ve. --- --- --- 24 --' --- --- 75 --- -__ ___ 26 ~~~ CITY OF RA?vCHO CT.7CA!'vIONOA STAFF REPORT >' , DATE: October 7, 1992 ~ ~ , i T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II~~~.,. SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 10210, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALMDND AVENUE WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SUBMITTED BY FIRST HOTEL INYESTME NT CORPORATION RECOMlENOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub3 ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 10210 were approved by the City Council on July 5, 1991, in the following amounts: Streets Undergrounding Faithful Performance Bond: $1,284,000 $535,000 Labor and Material Bond; S 542,000 $267,500 The developer, First Hotel Investment Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the last of the improvements, and also to resolve a drainage issue with Southern California Edison and Department of Water 3 Power. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ V William J. 0'Ne 11 City Engineer WJ D:SMG:sd Attachments l RESOLUTION N0. 9a -~~i,J A RESOLUT?ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10210 WHEREAS, the fi ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 7, 1992, by First Hotel Investment Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Almond Avenue and west of Sapphire Street; and WHEREAS, the in=_tallation of such improvements, described in said improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 10210; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension. on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~ d.3 ct'1'Y Ut' RANCHO CUCAil40NGA '~\ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer STAFF REPORT ~,. i DATE: October 7, 1992 ~ ~; T0: tdayor and Members of the City Council '~'~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager 8Y: Steve M- Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II ~^ SUBJECT: .4CCE"rTANCE OF IMPP.OVEME NTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COM?LETION FOR PARCEL M.4? 10295 - 'REST GREENWAY CORRIDOR EXTENDING FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SPRUCE AVENUE AND ELM AVENUE TO WEST GREENWAY PARK RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Parcel Map 10295 - West Greenway Corridor have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City C~nnril art^nt. said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $143,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 10295 - West Greenway Corridor extending from the northeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue to West Greenway Park DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond £143,000 Rasp ec ifully submlt~d, ~~~ William J. O'Neill City Engineer WJO: SMf,: sd Attachment ` ~~ RESOLUTION N0. %~ - a~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 10295 - WEST GREENWAY CCRRIOOR ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WF'EREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 10295 - West Greenway Corridor have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and 'WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to 6e filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted an6 the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 105 CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CATE TO: FROM: BY: saaaECT: October 7, 1992 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Arad duller, City Planner An rhea Har ti.g, Associate Planner 0 LANDMA.41( DESIGNATION 52-02 - Approval of an application to designate the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, located at 12912 Fcothill Rou levar d, Aancho Cucamonga, as a Historic landmark - APN: 1100-0G1-02 ENVIRONMENTAL ASREBRMENT OF DEMOLITION AEQUE ST FOR THE PEARSON ETAT ION AND GARAGE (A POTENTIAL LOCAL LANDMARX, STATE LAND.MA?R, AND NATIONAL REGI STEA ELIGIBLE STRUCTUREi - A request to d_molish a portion of the Pearson Filling Sta t,i on and Garage, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard, Aancho Cucamonga - APN: 1108-061-02. The Historic Preservation Conm:i ssion reconvnends the preparation of a focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in order to best assess the adverse impact to this resource. other options that could be considered include the issuance of a M iti geted Negative Declaration. RECOlPNR7DATION: The Historic Preservation Conmis Sion re cosvnends that the City Council approve an application to designate the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Historic Landmark. In ze spon s? to the demolition request of a portion of this structure, the Cnrtanis Si on further recommends the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report in order to best assess the adverse impact to this zeaource. Other options that could be considered include the issuance of a Mrtigated Neyati v? Uec la ration. BACICGAGOND: The process by which we have come to this review has been ccmpliccte.'. and lengthy and i+- seems °~^r.. .,.. ... ,. it„pmvemen t. requxremen is at the intersection of Focthi 11 Boulevard and Etiwanda nvenue of the S...a....li Marketplace project. Initial concerns of the px'operty owners were the result of questions raised by the ix insurance company about the potential Eor increased liability i.E the lnra tior, of the traffic si. gna is on that northeast. corner were placed in their u l.t imate lc.:a tion - placing the ports-cochere (covered portico or canopy) of the gas etatien, most of which is in he right-of-way, close : r. the si and 1. More ieeantlp, we na .c :~.,.. __ "'-' ~ ^ +~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION Octoler 7, 1992 Page 2 onrb return are placed in their ultimate iota ti nn it will require the re-routing of the high powered 661CV electrical lines. Tt1e re-routing would put the 6GRV line directly over the station's porte-cochere and thereby also necessitate demolition. Since the Historic Prese zvation Commission's action on August 25, 1992, an on-site inspe cti or. of the station's porte-cochere was made by Jerry Grant, City Building Official, at the request of the City Planner. The purpose of the inspection was to gather additi oral information on the possible relocation an3 reuse of the station's porte-cochere. The £uilding Official found that the current condition of the porte-cochere constitutes a public nuisance and should be abated by fencing around the porte-cochere, pen d; ng any permanent solution to its existence. He also determined that attempts to re locate the structure might very well re suit in it falling apart in the process (see Exhibit "C"). With this new information, and the fact that the ultimate street improvements will require the removal of the porte-cochere, staff's recommendation includes the option of a Mitigated Negative DQ Cla ration. A Mitigated Ne gative Declaration with con ditione would allow for the removal of the porte-cochere. This option was not presented to the Historic Preservation Commission at their August 25, 1992 meeting since the inspection was not made by the City Building Official until later. Should the City Council determine that they support the applicant's request for demolition and that the proposed mitigations do address the loss of the existing porte-cochere, the City Covncil may take action on the Mitigated Ns gative Declaration by minute action at this meeting. Whether the City Council requires a focused Environmental Impact Report or a Miciga red Negative Denla ration, the immediate fencing of the porte- cochere is recommended until a permanent decision is made. 8I5T'0RIC PRE.gBINATIOM 00l4RSSIQ! ACfIQ/: The Commieaign found that the structure, known his tgrically as the Pea raon Pilling Station and Garage, cL=arly met mosT. of the cxiteria outlined in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and that fuzthe rmore, the station represents both the Etiwanda Community and importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore (sea Exhibit "A"). It was also built in 1928-1929, a few years of ter Route 66 opened in 1926, by one of the area'e moat important contractors, Henry Kl.usman. Virtually unalte zed, the Pearson Filling £tati nn and Garage stands as a one of the oldest and rarest examples in rile entire region o£ vernacular roadside architecture. The Commission upon the it review of the structure determined unanimously to recommend tandma rk desi qna ti on and that the historic station was also potentially eligible for placement on the National Register of Historic Ylacea. Lastly, the ComnLLaslon recommended the signals be allowed lc be placed in an inverLu locations rather than ultimate, in orPgr to of ve adr_quate rims fem. _, romplrte "raav. ---+ CITY CODNCIL STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION October 7, 1992 Page 3 ffi7VFRONMSNTAL ASSBSSMSNT: The action to approw_ the landmark status of the said structure is exempt under CEQA per Article 19, Se otion 15380. Because of their findings and upon review of Initial Studies, Parts 1 and II, the Commission finds that this proposed demolition of the porte- cochere will have an adverse impact on the Pearsott Filling Station that cannot be mi tigated fully. By adln~te action, the Commission unanimously recommended that the ultimate street signal configuration be delayed and that it remain in an interim location until the property owner on the northeast corner is ready to develop their property and, if the Council does not wish to delay the ultimate placement of the improvements, that a focused Environmental Impact Report and other necessary studies be prepared to assess tamale to ly the impact on the structure (see Exhibit "C"). As noted in the background ee coon of this report, if the Council does not concur with the Commi ssion'c asaessaient, and thsss determines that the impact of the proooaed demolition can De mi ti.gated, another option would be to approve the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. If the Council should thus determine, staff would recommend consideration of the following mitigation measures: 1. Document the porte-cochere structure, according to the standards laid out in the federal. Aistoric American Huil dint Survey (NABS) guidelines, prior to issuance o£ Demolition Permit for the porte-cochere; or Document the entire structure, according to the standards laid out in the federal Historic Anse ri can eullding 8u rvey (HAHS) guidelines, prior to issuance of Demolition Permit for the porte-cochere (the reason for requiring that the entire structure be documented at this time would b° to ensure that the cunte xt of the porte-cochere to the main structure is not forgotten). Tt is estimated that the coat to do the entire structure is approximately $7,000; to do the ports-cochere only would be approxima to ly $4,000. 2. Prior to the deve l.opment ar redevelopment of the property, the prnpe rty owner shall perform a feasibility study on the adaptive reuse of the gas station structure, including the reestablishment of the removed porte-cache te. The study aha 11 include a report, from: 1) a qualified structural engineer, who spa cializeg in historic strvcture s, to determine the structural soundness c£ the structure and the potential For Sts relocation; 2) a qualified architect and an economic analyst to eatabll sh a range of possible uses that are historically sensitive, economically feasible, and that best utll ire the site and structure. C~ CITY COUNCLL STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION October 7, 1992 Page 4 The study shall also address the reed and [ype of additional mitigations T-hat may be neceasa ry if the ultimate development of the site impacts the historic relevance of the gas station structure and ports--c oche re. FACTS POR FINDINGS: The ¢nvironmental review of the proposed partial demolition of the Pearson Pilling Station and Garage is in keeping with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinan eC, General Plan, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Elirther environmental analysis is provided in the attached staff report from the August 25, 1992 Historic Preservation Commission nesting. The demolition will have a de T, rimental effect on one of our commnmity's hietaric resources. CORRESPONDENCE: These itevs have been advertised as a public h¢a ring in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspape t, noti cea were sent to property acne rs within a 300-foot radius of the structure, and the site have Leen poe to d. Re spe lly sub to d, Hrad~ ller City Planner BB:AH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff Report dated August 25, 1992 Exhibit ^e" - Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 92-04 Exhibit ^C" - Historic Preservation Commission minutes dated August 25, 1992 Exhibit "D^ - Memo dated September 16, 1992 /09 CIT•X OF RA;VCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT ^~_ CA.E: August 25, 1392 -... Chairman and Members of the Hi stone Prese n: atioa Cs:runission FRCM: Larry v. Henderson, ATCP, Princ_pai Planner 3Y: Aathea N.. Hartig, Associate Planner SJB,:ECT: - - RTC STA'I'NS AND AFP•- A"rNg FF=R _gi$TORTC PC SNT OF INT R2CT OR ,AND AqE DEQ GNATIO~gv T4' HICTORIC oRF SF RVAT- N r M i ON ION O DE MOL'TT ON 4FOOE C^ BY TH PROF RTY OWN R^ AYD TP- POCC R FCmAO"CHMFNT OF MI TSCATT N MFA iR C TH FFI FOR T' A ° T THE NC RTYFpcT CO ^KF2 ^F FTTWANDA AVFNr F AND F OTHI BOI VARDn 917 FOOT4I• 0 F' - - - Consideratior. ar.d determination of the historic status, application for Point cf Znte rest or Landmark Designation, range of appropriate project alternatives, and level of appropriate mitigations for Che partial demolition of the structure. The actions and recommendations can include the following: Landmark status, Point of Interest status, other project aite rnatives, andi or mitigation measures prior to demolition. HA C.KG RO'tyD: on July 30, 1992, Barry Vantige r, on behalf of his pa nine es, eeques tetl the pa ztial demolition of a building historically known as the Pearso r. Filling Stac.i on antl Garage, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard. Based upon Historic Preservation Ccrtvni ssi on policy, a Landmark/Point of Interest Desi gr.ation application was initiated in order to establish a fc zmai review procedure. AfCer subsequent review, the scruct ure was also added to the Historic Sites Survey as a Potential Local Landmark and Potertial Listing on the Na[icnai Register of Historic Places (at the cu czent, time, the status c' the State Point of Ir,te rest program is suspended until a program ini[ia[icg a State Pegister of Historic Places can be implems nted?. At its meeting o: August 6, 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission agreed to hold a spec tai public hearing to determine the significance of Che Peazson Station and to review the associated demolition request (the Landmark Designation application is i., .iuded as Exhibit "HPC-1" and Site Plan Exhibit "NPC-2"1. ..= ercce ss by wh.icr. we have come to this review has been comp licaCed a::d . encihy and it stems from the involved Foothill Marketplace project (site eE t.r ire Price Club acd WalMa rt! In approving the CondiCior.al Use Pe rrniC .s. '.he Feethill Marketplace center, the City placed a condition on the orc'.eo^. ee quirirw the imp ro:eme nt of [he Foothill Bouleva zd/Et iwanda Avenue note rsection. The full extent of these improvements was not known at the time of pin -~ect approval antl at the time cf r.his Commission's review of Che ispaa ed cultu rat resources on [he southwest corner bets use detailed pans were not available, '.[ has only Ueen Lheough the review of Che final sCreee Lao rovement plans that we have realized the full impact of the required changes. 6a sed on the traffic study for the project end the City's tra Ef.ic mode:, .r was determined that the developer needed to complete a xa noe cf ~. ~1 BPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 7.992 Pace 2 improvements, including placement of the traffic signal at Et iwanda Avenue, which is to be upgraded to handle the anticipated traffic. As is policy with the installation of traffic signals, the City requires the sigr:al poles to be located in their ultimate location to avoid having to relocate the poles at a later date. In the specific instance at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, the pole will be located aFProxi mately 3D feet northeast cf its current location, plating it in line with Ue canopy of the existing gas station on that corner. Initial plans Eoz the northeast ce rnez were approved by both CaLt rans and the City with the pole in ivs ultimate location with temporary curbs and pavement proposed that would eliminate the need to alter the canopy. The developer then proceeded to work wi*_h the property cwne rs to obtain the necessary right-of-way in order to install the signal. It seemed that agreement had been reached between the two parties until the property owners' insurance company threatened to cancel the'_r insurance if the pole was placed in the approved location. The insurance company claimed that the proposed pole location would encourage more pedestrians to walk under the gas station canopy in order to access the nxoss»alk. This, in Lhei: opinion, places the station in a position of greater liability and, therefore, could not 6e supported. As a result, the property owner does feel it is in their best interest to provide the developer with the necessary street dedication. On July 25, 1992, City staff met w'_th the developer of the center and the gas station property owners to discuss alternatives to placing the signal in the ultimate location. one suggestion called for the signal to be placed in an interim location, within the existing right-o£-way, that would not impact the gas station canopy. This solution xould regal re the pole to be relccated upon development of the northeast corner. Also, Che interim location would be contrary to current City policy. The City has also pursued the possibility of ins tali ing a chain link fence around the canopy to prevent access under the canopy. According to the property owner, this alternative was not found to 6e acceptable by the property owners' insurance company, A third suggestion called for the removal of the canopy in order to eliminate the "liability" expressed by the property owner's insurance company. In that this solution would place the pole in the ultimate location and remove a potential liability, the property owner submittetl a demolition permit requesting removal o£ the canopy. It should be noted that a written explanation o£ the insurance company's position has not been submitted. Fallowing submittal of the demolition permit, staff also received correspondence from the Bevel open that a substantial elett rical utility line and pole at the northeast corner had to 6e relocated in order to widen the street as approved. By doing this, the utility pole would be located close to the proposed signal location, Because the po»e: lines angle to the east, the relocation o£ the utility pole would place the lines ovex the existing canopy, contrary to the policy of Southern California Edison (Sr E), IE left in the interim location, the lines would be away from the building a sufficient distance to satisfy SCE. HPC STAFF REPORT P EARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 3 $~$iO'hTION AN') pFCCRIPTION~ A. Location: The structure lies in the northeast cornet of the parcel at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwa rda Avenue and the parcel is close to two acres in size. The site's topography is relatively flat and other distinguishing features include a variety of mdCn LE CIEES. 8. S1LP Land Ose T nd Fn~r hi 11 Rnv levard Snecific Flan p-y~gypne ;ono, The parcel lies within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Beulevard Specific Plan, and per Foothill eo ulevard Speci `_ic Plan Amendment 91-01 submitted by the same property owners, this corner parcel's land use designation was changed from Medium Residential to Cormnunity Cortune rcial, and includes the requirement of a Master Plan fox the site and surrounding area. C, c~ ~-Q r d~S~° ? ~ Q nd Fnnt hill Boulevard ~apecific Plan Des i,ynations: As with the subject property, the parcels to the north, south, east, and west ace also designated Conanunily Cormle rcial per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. p, a n'r rte, Sri al OP=mar 'y ion: The structure is a former service station and garage. The large rectangular concrete, single-story building has a three-bay po rte cochere. There are mature trees to [he east of the structure. The roof is a flat hip with zed barrel Lila for both the building and poste cochere. The Lila roof on the north elevation has been removed and replaced with asphalt shingles of a matching color. A skylight with six panes has also been added to the middle of the hip roof on the north elevation. The pone coch<re bases are constructed of poured conczete. The north and south bases had two pumps oath and the middle base had one pump, all of which have been removed. The columns are square and unadorned, with slighr ly flared capitals. The main garage is constructed o£ slip-form poured concrete and the po rte cochere is of wootl frame construction with thick cement stucco. The walls are currently painted white with red accent antler Che eaves. There is evidence tha^_ the walls were once painted zeC, mustard, and navy blue at different times. The fenestration pattern of the structure is as follows: North Elevation: The door (approximately 6 i/2 feet high) nos been removed and the opening has been boarded up. There are two 2n-.paned windows side-by-side to the ease of the door on the north elevation. A metal orate has been added to the windows. The si.z panes in the center of the windows open outward. South Elevation: The front door is under the pone cochere. It is a single door with a single-pane window. Above the door is a single-paned window and the xe ace single-paned, wood-f tamed windows to the left and tight of the doors, The window to the left is boa xded over with metal gcates. The six panes in the center of the windows open out wand. I I HPC STAFF R^cPCRT PEARSON FILLING STATION August ?. 5, 1992 Page 4 cast Elevation: There are two windows, spaced approzimavely 10 feet apart, that have 20 panes. Both windows are cover_d with metal grates. The six panes in the oentez of the windows open outward. west Elevation: TY.e re is a 20-oaned window on the south side revered with a met ai grate. The six panes in the center of the window open outward. There is a small service bay an the west elevation and a laryez service bay on the south elevation. The service bay doors on the south elevation are constructed of 2 1/2-inch vertical siding with 5 1/2-i.^.ch boards spaced 4 1/2 feet apart. There are three decorative hinges on the top of each of the sliding doors and the 5 1/2-inch boards are cut !c a point on *_he base board. The alidinS doors are on a tza ck mechanism that is still in ooace. The ze are two lA-inch concrete buttresses, one on each side of the sez vi ce bay doors. There is one gooseneck light above the right service bay door and there is one gooseneck light to the right of the service bay doors. The small service bay on the west elevation has double wooded doors and is constructed of 2 1/2-inch vertical aiding on the top and 6-inch horizontal siding on the bottom. There axe small wooden decorations on the top corners. The door corners are rounded. There ass also two 1A- inch concrete hail re sses, one on each side of the service bay doors. Centered above the doors is a gooseneck light. Histnrinal sack . a; The service station was built in 1928-1929 by an important local contractor, Henry Klusmar, the renowned concrete man, for Sohn "nor" Pearson and Lee Stevens who were brothers-in-law. They sold vas fo: automobiles as well as distributing it to the local citrus ranchers. After a short time, l1r. Pearson alone owned the station and provided a full complement of out omobi.le -related services. Located along Route 66 which had been completed in 1926, the station was a ftequer,t stop o£ Depression-e za immigrants who would spend the night in their cars on the site because they had no other place to stay. Also at that time, Doc Pearson gave gas away to travellers who simply could not pay. P.J. Pearson Clark, Doc's niece, recalls ono of the more outstanding humanitarian efforts exhibited by her uncle. A "Dust Bowl" family had completely run out of money when they reached Etiwanda. It seems one of their sons had a lovely voice, so lovely in fact that the family was moving from Oklahoma to Hollywood so he could be "discovered." Mr. Pearson, aft.e: hearing the boy sing, organized a coimnun ity concert at the Pea eson's family packing house and raised enough money for the young boy and his family to contirue their travels. The stn t.i on also served £or many decades as a gathering place for Loral residents. Grove owners would come to the station when it was cold and togeeher would wait and wonder if temperatures would drop below freezing. While they waited they would gather around the radio for entertainment. Residents of Etiwanda had only three places to purchases HPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLSNG STATION August 25, 1992 Page 5 their gasoline and of them, Pearson's was the most modern and full- serviced. Highway Patrol officers assigned to the local stretch of Route 66 also congregated at the service station, in particular Frank Fraemar, and "TNO-Gun" Louis, who spent many hours with their friend Doc Pearsc n. An episode retold by Mr. Samos Clark is particularly revealing of the role the service station played in decades gone by; namely, of the races that would be held along Route 66, Foothill 8ou7.evard, from the border of Upland to Doc Peazaon's garage. The two officers would station themselves at either end to stop traffic on the two-lane road and allow the motorcycle races to proceed. Mr. Pearson eventually sold the station to the Myers family, whc continued to operate in the same community-based spi cit. The station and garage also represent a basically intact example of a local, vernacular expression of the very popular Spanish Revi cal architectural style constructed by the foremost concrete contractor of. the day, Henry Kl usma n. As such, it is the only example of its building type to have retained as much of its original appearance and one of a handful of rapidly disappearing Klusman structures. Along the regional stretch of Foothill Boulevard, the roadside vernacular that characterized the physical landscape of Route 66 is rapidly being replaced. The Pearson Filling Statior. and Garage remains, hoveve r, as a testament to this important stylistic and cultural period of American history, A. Favor Find'n~~": Per the City's Hi stozic Prase rvaticn Ordinance, Section 2.24.090, the following findings are made per [he landmark review criteria specified in that section. Riatorical aad Cultural SSgniflcaaca Siading: The proposed landmark/point of interest is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way cf life. Fact: Representing both the Etiwanda cit cus community and the importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore, the st cucture harkens back to an era of agricu Mural growth and mass western migration. Offering fuel, mechanical services, and often a helping hand, the station and its owners were an important part of the local area. Finding: The propc•sed landmark/point of interest is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. The proposed landmark/point of interest is connected wikh a business oz use which was once convnon but is now za re. Fact: Gas stations and ga eases from the early age of the automobile were a prominent feature of many local landscapes, inc.l uding the Etiwanda acea. Most of these roadside stations and garages have fallen out of use or been abandoned or demolished. With their loss, physical reminders of the everyday patterns that charact=sized coxvnu oily life sixty years ago are fading. / I HPC STAFF REPORT PEARS ON FILLING STAT I•JN Avgust 25, 1992 Page 6 Finding: The proposed landmark/point of interest is of greater age than most of its kind. Fact: Opening shortly of=er the completion of Route 66 in 1926, the 2earson Filling Station and Garage is one of the oldest such 9tLUCtuLZ9 eY.ta Ct. Finding: The proposed landmark/point of interest was connected with someone renowned or important oz a local personality. Fact: The Pearson family was and is deeply connected with the cultural and familial fabric of Eti uanda history. Finding: The azchitect or builder was important. Fact: Builder Henry Kivsman was one of the more talent and significant local builders to mark the pages of the area's history books. 2. Riatoric llrchitectural and ¢ngiaearing Sigaificance Finding: The constzuction materials or engineering methcds used in the proposed landn;a rk/point of intezest axe unusual oz significant oz uniquely effective. Fact: The zeserved, vernacular expression of the very popular Spanish Revival architectural style demonstrates local interest in bzoadex stylistic trends, 3. Neighbozhood and Geographic Setting Finding: The proposed landmark/point of interest materially bone fits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact: AL the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue intersection, the station is the only remaining link tc an import anr, element of local history and to an epoch of our national experience. Without it, al.l physical traces of that portion of Route 66 will be lost. Finding; The proposed landmark/point cf intezest in its location, represents an established and familiaz visual feature of the neighborhood, ccrtunu nity, or city. Fact: Fox over 65 years, the Pearson Filling Station and Garage has been a comm~anity resource and its owners, the Pearsons, Stevens, and Myezs to name a few, added to the co~mnunal experience o` the Etiwanda area. 0. ?.g'' f O t' F N-ti -1 R q' t f H' t p' Pl ~~o Fi i.~.~ b Only the National Park Se r.vice in toll abo raticn with the State Historic Preservation Officer can formally list a structure on the Register. But as a part of this review, staff has reviewed the Pea xs on Filling Station and Garage pox the Register Criteria. Staff finds the st ruceu re eligible under sections A and C of the fact that "The qual i'cy J 1-~ HPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 7 of significance in American history, architecture, archaeel ogy, and culture is present in districts, sites, bciidings, structures, and cbj ects that possess integrity of locaticn, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: A. That are associated with events that have made a significant coot ributier. to the broad patterns of our history; and... C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of const ruction.^ D. jggpea,: The property owners requested the immediate demolition of the canopy of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage due to the purpcrted demands placed uoon them by their insurance company in light of the street improvements required by the Foo*h.i 11 Marketplace project. In a lest er son: to the City, attached as Exhibit "HFC -3," the owners expressed that in their opinion, the structy re lacked any "historical value." It appears then that the owners would object to staff's findings in support of a landmark designat ion. Thus, in accordance with the Conmi ssion's policy on owner objecticn, staff has reviewed the structure based on the policy's three necessary findings, that the structure is: listed on the City's inventory, stands out as havinG outstanding historical architectural, and cultural significance; and that des ignatior, as a landmark could help protect it throvu_h the environmental review process required under CEQA. E. Fnvizonmen•al Asneea a r; Any future landmark designation would 6e exempt from CEQA undo cm Are icle 19. Sectior. 1538C. ANp i.y SIS - F.NVIRONMFNTAI. pCnF C[MF~'T "c nF~^~~^T^~• e If the Con¢nission concurs with staff that the structure is sigrifi cant to the community's heritage, then the proposed demolition as requested nagatively impacts this resource. Tne demolition permit request can be considered a project under CEQA because ii is an activity involving an action, issuance of [he demoli*.ion permit, by a public agency.l Staff has evaluated the structure per the City's Historic Pzese rvation Ordinance and on National Register criteria. After completing the Irit ial Study, staff has found That the prooosed project will have ar. adverse impact on identified cultural zesou rtes that cannot be mitigated fully (please see attached Exhibit "HPC-5," Initial Study, Parts I 6 III. Al*..h ough cniy an application for a permit to demolish the canopy of the structure has been submitted ai this time, staff asserts that Lois act would adversely impact the stcucture for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the pozte cochere (cancpy) acts as the major architect ucal element that announces the building's use--that of a gas station. Even without the pumps, there is .1 itt.le mistaking the statement that the canopy makes archite ctura.l ly and functionally. With the removal of the canopy, the structure woultl lose its 1Please refer to Apde, Sert ion 21065 and c: .i~lin~, Sections 15378 (a) and 15352. HPC STP.r-F REPORT P EARSON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Ra qe 9 most distinguishing and prominent £eatu re. Secondly, if permission were granted to demolish only the canopy and since such ar. undertzking would reduce dramatically the structure's significance, there would be little impetus to preserve the rema indez of the structure. Moreover, such a partial demol incr.-- literaliy chipping away at a building's si gni£icance--goes against the intent of our City's Misto xic Preservation Ozdina n<e an3 CEgA and potential national reel ster eligibility. Although this tlemolition permit has beer. requested separately, the structure's proposed destruction could be seen as being tied to future tlevelopment plans. Case law pertaining to what is known as "splitting" a project under CEQA has created a significant precedence for reviewing the poienti ai negati.ve effects ,£ a proposed project with the project itself.2 Therefore, to conform to legal procedures, the oref erred <ouxse of action wmrld be to wait until a coemne mial project was submitted fox this site and then to review an}• and a:1 environmental impact, including Chose to cultural resources, as part of that project. Since the property owners applied £or, and received a received a zoning change on this parcel, from Medium ftesi dentral to ConvcuniCy Comore xcial, and consi dezing the furore draw of the Foothill Marketplace project, it seems highly likely the site will be redeveloped in the near £ucure. Staff would ±hus recommend two options at this time: that 1) either the apprcved portion of the improvements in their ultimate location be installed or 2) that the Ciiy Council accept interim impzoveme nts and thus not alter the current configuration o£ the northeast side of the intersection until the time when the respective property owners are ready to submit a project on the site (please see Exhibit "HPC-4^ for diagrams. With both options, staff feels that if the structy ze will be vacant, a security fence should be installed around it and the building should be securetl to the highest standards. The City Engineer has indicated this exception to the City's improvement policy is a^,ceptable because installing only a portion of the curb return and the sianai in [heir ultimate locati or, will not necessarily make the intersectien any more viable at this time. If the applicant still deal zes to demolish the canopy portion of the structure, staff finds that the only way to perhaps mitigate the impact would he tp relocate the ent; re ern+ctn ro safely inside the tight-of-way and in correspondence to City setbacks and to maintain its current conf iguratior. and zelati onship to the streets cape. This move would be in cooxdina r,i,on with the the State Histocic Preservation Officer (SHPO) to ensure that the structure's National Register eligibility would not be compromised. It this relocation were not contemplated, staff :eels that the tlemolition request would reavize Ue completion of a Focused Em ironmental Impact Report (EI R), refer to the c".~°, Section 15063 (c1 (3). In order to best analyze the potential of adaptively reusing and r,hus prese ruing the structure, this EIR would include a feasibility stutly whose recommendations would be implemented per CEQA. This Feasibility Study would be mor.iCezed and approved by the City but paid for by the applicant. The only way to allow for demolition of a part 2Please refer Co Orinda Assn. v. ©card of Supervisors, supra, 182 Cal. App. 3d 1145 (7986), Laurel Heights, supra, 47 Cal. 3d 376 (1988), Citizens Assn. £oz Sensible Gevelapment of eiship Area v. County of Invo, supra, 172 Cal. P11. 3d (1985, and r_ity o£ Antioch v. City Council, 187 Cal. App. 3d (1386). I' HPC STAFF REPORT PEARSON PILLING' STATION August 25, 1992 Page 9 or the whole o£ the structure vould then be for the City Ceun cil to make a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" after their rev iev o£ the EZR. The Council would have to find that tY,e benefits of the demolition project outweighed the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, and thus finds these adverse effects "acceptable," Ifsde, Section 11093 (a)). CDHRPS~. This item has been advertised in the Inland vat ley nai~v Bulletin, property owners within 300 feet of the project site have been notified, staff has inspected the pzope rty, and the pxopezty's owners are aware of this review process. RF.C OMMFNDATION: Sta £E recommends that the Commission forward to the City Council a recommendation for landmark designation for the Pearson Filling Station and Garage. Staff also zecomumends [hat the application to demolish oa rt iaily the structure be denied and that the Commission recommend that Che City Council direct staff to continue to work with the applicant in order to se cv re the site without any demolition and/or waive the ultimate traffic signal location policy in this unique case. If however, the applicant still desires to demolish the canopy and thus seriously and irrevocably reduce the significance of [he st rvcture as it has been presented to yov in this report, staff recortmnends the pcepa ration of a Fooused EI R. Respectfully su 'tied, ~~ Larry Henderson, AICP Principal Planner BB:AMH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Landmark Application with Photographs Exhibit "HPC-2" - Site Plan Exhibit ^NPC-3" - Letter from Barry Vartiger, et. al. Exhibit ^HPC-9" - Curb 6 Signal Diagrams Exhibit ^NPC-5" - Inltlal Study, Partd I 6 II Resolution Recommending Approval //8 C ay' o! Rancbe Cucamonga Appl:cat:on for HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION % Histcne Lantlmark Y,1 cr.o rin Point of Into re sY IDENTIFiCA'ION 1. 6'O®On Nase: D::ane's $B rV 1CB is r2tlP 2. Historic Name, if known: Pearsu^ 'ae ane 6 r`1"~ ~ •' 3. Sweet or Rural ACdress: i23'_? Footc ill P.ouieva rd City: Ra echo Cucamonca Zip: 31735 County: San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-161-OZ Zone:_COnmerc ia` t,e gal Description: $ i'? $H' 1!4 SN 1/A SF,C TP 1S 4. Present Owner, if known :0harles V. O~rnin9yddreea: 1645 S. :enrol a. _. City: :JOiand y'1 p: 91796 pm ereh ip Ss: Public private 5. Pre se at L'se: vacant Original Gse: 'ill in^ Station s Ga ra ~:e Other past uses: None DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the preaest physlcm appearance of the site or structure and describe any ma,7 orT ratlops Trom Its origanal condition: The structure is a former Service sta Clop 6 aara qe. The large rectanau lar, concrete, srnq le story bux!dinc has a three-bay Porte coche re. TY.ere aro mature fr^_es to the east o: the structure. The roof is flat bin 7. Location sketch map (drv ! label 8. Approxlmnte property size: site and surroupding streets, Lot Slze (in Seet) .-oatls, and promlpent landmarks): Frontage Depth or approx. acreage 9. Condition: (check one-) n. Excelleot_ b. Good c. Falr X d. Deteriorated A I e. No longer In existence_ ?0. Is the femurs: n. Altered? b. Unaltered? X Q 11. Sur roundlo gs: (check more than 3 IGJ one iT necessarY) a. Open land 1i1 b. Residential X W c, Scattered bufidin gn X d. Densely built-up_ e. Commercial X ~~N~IL BLVD' i f. Inausx rlel - ~ I g. Other_ I NIl9 f ~X+-N Rr{ T f+R. - l a 12. Threats to Sate; a. None known-, b, Private development c. Iona ng_ d. Public Works Prof act ;t e. Pan daiism ^ f. Other 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) F~av 1991 SOTE: The follomSng (Items i4-19) are Sor structures or. iy. 14. Prtmary exierlor buvl divg matei:at; a. Sxone_ b. Brick_ c. Stucco ~ d. Adobe__ _. Wood }~ f. Other =ate 15. Is t.De Structure: a. On its original slte? X b. Yeve d? c. Unknown? 16. Year of Initial Covst ruct iqn: '_929 This Dnte ls: n. Factual D. Estimated X 19. drehit act (11 known): '.:nknown 1R. Builder (if known): ~-{QN wI ~A.Y~VVIQIA J 19. Related Features: n. Horn D. Carriage house c. Outhouse d. Ehed(s)__ e. Formal Gardev(s) f. Windmill g. Watertower/t mkhouae h. Other Trees i. Nope SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly stets historical and/or architectural importance (Seclude dates, events, and persons asegciated with the site whee known): The service station was originally owned by John "DO^.° Pearson c iee Steve rs who were brothers-in-law 6 sold gas for automobiles F a15o distri bated gas to the local farmers. The s tar ion is located along the Eormer Route 66 6 durinn the 21. Yn1v theme of tNe historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture X b. Arts Y L¢lsure ... Economic/tvduet rlal 3 d. Government e. Esploratlon/Settlement f. Yilitnry g. Religion h. Social/Eduv¢tion 1 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, antl their tlfltes: H; ck mx. Eti wan 3a: The r.arc ~0 y 1991. Interview: Sob Hickccx, March 25, 1992. Mrs. James 'l ark, Mar-:h 20, 1992 b Auqu s-t li 1992. 23. Oats form prepared Aug~dst 1992 By ~nnme ): Vince Bertoni/Anthea !iartin paaress: 10500 Civic Center Df. City: Rancho Cecamonga Zip: 91729 Phone: (?l1) 999-191 Organization: City of Fanchc Cucamonna t)' /~ ~- Ib ADDE~D'Jp - DCA~°_~5 SERVICE STdT?ON De scrip=ion 55 wr •_h red, barrel ti le `er 'uc th the S•~i lding G oo rte cochere. TSe ti le roof .... the north sleva cion has been removed & replaced with as_o ha it shingles of a ca t;:h:v colgr, a skylight with six vanes has ai so been added Lc LSe piddle of the hip zoo! gn the north elevation. The no rte cochere Gases are gonstr•rc ted of poured concrete. The north 6 south banes had two oumns each s t..e middle base had er,e pure, whir*. all have been removed. The columns are s::-uare 6 unadorned wit`, slightly Eiared capitals. ^he r.air. garage is rors tructed of slip-torn poured concrete b the pcr _e cochere a of wood Frame construction with thick cement stucco. The wails are currentiv paraed white wi tl: red accent under' the eaves. There is _•/idence that the walls were o-,ce ::a ir.ted roc, mustard & navy blue at different times. The fenestration pat'=::: „_ t:^.e structure is as follows: :]o rt`, 61eva[ion: The door (approximate iy 6 1/2 feet high) has been removed and the ope viva has been boarded up. There are two - 20 paned windows side-bv-side to the easy o.` the door or, the north elevation. A metal grate has Seen added to the windows. The six panes in the center of the windows ope r. outward. South Elevation: T.he door is under the porte cochere. It is a single door with a single-pane window, Move the door is a single-pane window and there are single-?aped, wood framed windows to the left and right of the doors. The window to the left is Scarded over with metal grates. The six panes in the renter of the windows ope r. outward, F:a st Elevation: There are. two windows, spaced approximately ten feet aoa rt, the= 'r:ave 2. panes. Goth wrndows are covered with metal grates. The six i~a nos t:. the center o: ehe windows open outward. West E;ova Cron: There is a 20-paned window on the south side revered with a metal grate. The six vanes in the center of the window open outward. There is a sma li service bay on the west elevation and a la rger service bay on the sou Ch slevatron. The service bay doors on the south elevation are co nstrvcted of 2 1;2 inch vertical siding with 5 1/2 inch boards spaced A 1/2 feet a;'~a rL. There era three decorative hinges on the top of each of the sliding duo cs and t'ne 5 1!2 inch boards are cut to anoint on the base board. The s is di nq doors are or. a track mechanism that is still in place. There are two - Ui tn~'n ce r.r:rete b:;t tr_sses, one on each side of the service bay doors. There is one r~;use:~,e.;k :rrh i. above the right servrce bay dnor and there is one gooseneck light ;: `_hr rtairr r.f the servrce bav riocrs. The small se rc;::e bay on the west elevation has double •wooded doors is co nst ru o!.ed c., 1,'2 inch vertrcal siding on the top and E inch hurimntal srd u', ~~ or. th ~=, bottom. There are small wooden. decorations on the ton corners. The dope ^orners are rounded. Ti'~e re ace also rwo - 1R inch concrete buttresses, one on ea..-h srde o` the ser/ire bay doors. Centered above the doors is a yonse neck li;7ht. /~ I Ham.- Ic pDDENC'~:4 - D[:ANE'S SERVICE ST.yT?ON Desc n oti.o r. =2'- Depression, inv^:igraots would sRend the night .~: Chair cars on t*.e Site because the? had no other Glace to stay. T_he station aiso served ds a qa iner.:.y =lace for 1o cal residerte. i.ocal citrus gzove owners would come to t..e ste:ien when it was cold 6 would wait $or the the r:mmeter to iron be lcw :ree tiny b re `_vrn to the groves to cake care o' the fYeeLinq crops. Where tney wazted they would garner around the radio for enterta inure r.t. H: ghway patrol o`.ficers wou13 also gather at the service statioc. nearson 6 Ste•rens eventually sold the station to iha J1eyers faccily. ~~~ ~~~~ HISTORIC P.RESF.RVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SliP.VEY Address: '91' eco^~„-~ so^'r V1eK, Locking EAuT _^_ Date of Photo M Y 1991 ~.- le VSew I.ookiag omu .Date of Photo Mns 1991 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 12912 FOOTHILL OOULEVAR^u APN :1co-161-oz t ~ T"~--~ _ ("1 VIeWLOpldfl~ SOL`TN DflmOfPhO[O MHY 1991 , View Looking NOATN F. Dam of Photo Mav 1941 HISTORIC PRESERVATIO't COSIIvfISSION LAIJDI4ARK SURVEY Address: 12912 FDOrHILL flOBLE'.'FRD APN 1100-161-0? View Looking ~. Date of Photo Mnv i 991 hhPG- Iq View Looking wESr .Date of Photo nav 1.991 HIS7'OA.IC PRESERVATION CO;~LMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 1z9_z a'oo^xi;.:, aoo:.Ea;,au ,4P# =io^-a':-~z VIEW IAOldilg NORTHEAST D&~ Of PhOtO MH1' 1991 View Looking ~s .Date of Photo Mny ! 991 / ~ _.~~~__ _ __ __ ^T. ~ Y- ~ _~ _:~ ` ` / % . . _ ^~ / :. / ~ry ~' / ~ ~ ~ OftCHARp ~ i /~ / ~~ ~_ _ ~ ~ _ _ l_ ., //-".. V ~ ...y t ~~ ~. / i~ i 7 .___ ~ ,' f _ J ~ ~ LL .____Off_~ __w-= po _ -\ J r _ _~ \ ~-~~ x ~, .C55C I i ~\ i / / ~ Clt ~ > / / ~ ; .ti ~'1'`~.`.~ ~n \ ~ i ~ 1~ ?. Q ~ `'~iJ.A~. ~.: 2 ~ ~ ^" _ 3 \ \ / w ? ~_~ i c 4y~ - x im• s ® i0( ., } ~ pP X ~9 poc O~^ '/ / l / ~_ ~r~ _ ~ i^,t K ;~ / r _ ./ ~.._ . , __...L_ ITEM: r~ctSi\~.;A Sll~ ~~ TITLE, L. D~Z ^ O Z" C~ Z. _ ~~ l EKHIBIT~,NR~~LSCALE:I =1OA ., ll l:! 31i, io92 Ci ;>` :if Rancho Car_smonga :~immur, i±y Leve lntnent Lepartment ~1J6oJ Civic ••^,enter Grive Rsr.ckin ~~:, r~amringa, CA. 31730 Re: 3033 W. Foothill fNE Corner of Et, iwsnds & Foothill) The purpose of this letter is to request a determination of the lark of any significant historical value with regards to the :; kruo Lure iur_ated at tt;e above refz renoed address. This request is made in ronjurction with application for demolition of the existing canopy in order to accommodate the widening of the intersection and placement of new traffic lights. If there ie any additional information required or any questions concerning this request, plceae contact Barry Vant iger at 53•'s-4321. Mr. Vanr,iger is authorized to represent all owners with regards to this matter. A complete title and vesting is attached for your refererwe. r Respectfully, '~ / ~ // //'~ ~////~ / / 7 Ef/ ~u.L~,"rcrti William Oberhauser. Trustee Barry antlge rus*.ee 1646 Laurel Ave, 2177 N, Fi.ret Ave. Upland, CA. 91786 Uyland, CA. 917ti8 CF~artea V,, Cummins 1645 N. Laurel Ave. U~~iand, CA. 31796 rr prescn*.ing John Ruha1. Trustee 17331 ?ins Upland. CA. 917:36 :x r,tachment ~~ :: r, Le Snd resting for: ?C33 W, r'oothSil nivd, `N Ontana, CA. Rhacho Cucamorr8a, ';A, 3139 Aeseeor'e parrei Number 1100 161 02 Portion 5 1/2 SW li4 SW 1/4 SEC 4 TP 1S Census Tract: 6 71 2000 11 EA P•F'1 VAN'f IGER, WILLI All pBEFHAUSfiR and CORAL L. STRATTON, as Trasteee of the Gemmel Pharmacy Group, Inc. Shareholders" Trust, dated ,June 22, 1990 as ro an undivided one-third interest, 2) .JfiHN ROHAL and JACCy UETTA LOUISE AOHAL, ee True *.ees of tiro ROHAL FAMILY TRUST, established by Declaration of Trust dated April 5, 1983 as to an urd iv ided one-th Srd 1nteTeet, 3i WILLIAM J, pBERHAUSER and CARBON SUE pBERHAUSER, Ca-Trustees cif the pBERHAUSER FAMILY TRUST dated ,June 19, 1977, ae to an undivided one-third Sntereet. l~9 3b ~, QQ4( Q~ ~~ G1 ~ l 1 G~tISSS' - / .kI S/4KdC. L1 Rac.ES `~ C~NT~A ~P u~Ztw~Te ~irrita- S~~M1~ ~llILC.. Q,L~ G W~,., MEL~NaIJ __~ r= ~~ I ap~[I oN = l ITEM: l..D, q2-02 TIT E: "PP.e'Pnt_ v~71w~TE ~ 2a -.. s14~v`aL /~~ EXFIifl(T~ gSCALE N~Pc--' 4 ~~ Falr3~j7NN s~IfwB aF P~ - lu6rrj'--fib aE h/a ~t y P~ cp~oN a /N7SR¢yM Pa~r7lor~ AF ~ic.a 6u/A Ct~nESr ~knu+c. pa.e~a tsc7- zye,,! td.i,cs r -- CH ITE11: L~ D. g 2 -0 2 TITLE: ~XI ~/ h/ ~N ~ ~~ N GuRP~Q .3'4N~d[- Goc r 1 ~ EXHIHIT~ yjSCALE K~~}- ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose cE this form is to inform the City of the basic camponenta n! t.*.e proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act: and `he City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important chat the information requested in this application be provided in full; iNCONPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCEuSED. Please note that it is the responsibi Lity of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. E~76RAL INEORNAI'ZQ7 Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: D~ MO L~ - 7IONpERJ-Il7' /N LG1'~/G[ARRENCE WITH u4NDF-VJRK L>ES/4 9202 Project T!tle: Dam/-/OL/T7DN Ci1N0 7}/E ~q~Q SO/./ Ft4LJNFa .ST4 LiJ iNd A~fL+4E Name 6 Address of project ownei(e): __A~R_RY 1~/YVT/6rER /.!./'q[~ !~(3 N EHGLID pVE ON AR1O, ~ 9/76Z Name 6 Address of 3eveloper or project sponsor: 15a yJ~' a s d~ Contact Person 6 Addreee: Sp~mQ ~ ~Q~ Telephone Number: 9~ ^ ~lr~ name 6 Address of person preparing this form (St dl ffereat from above): fF • M • f~i-A-igTl bt ~MMUN/7'y L1E/6LV~/I.f~mN7- UG'.T~ yfY OF I°~Gfft> Gufi~MO/JGK1- P O BMX X07 ;2,0/./GFFO Gu~nu~DWFaA GE g172~ Telephone Number: ~Lf - 90-!" l LJ~~ C I T Y o f g A N C H 0 C U C A M O N G A /3~1 ~xf-H8/7- N pc - s e) Include a description of all pernits wF.ich will be necessary From the City of Paneho Cucamonga and other go ve r,use ntal agencies in order to Eu11y implement the project: FJlflGl1'N6t ~ERM~T ~/~-DEMOU770//~ /F 7aE5/4~ hlGTED A LG3".4[l.~h/A'"6d,~lG,, Q LA~.lDI1~T2JG q c.-r~r-~a-rrou ~ rw~7- wocc~D ~ru~V fib N~o,~ 9, Describe the physical setting cf the site as 1t exists 6efcre the project including information on topography, soil staD111 ty, plants and animals, meture trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (ineludirq age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In adds ilon, site all sources of :. nfo: motion (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and arch<ological surveys, traffic studies): pl~~ SEE ,477~'~~ STrd1°F /~l27"F~i2 G.• a. 9Z -~2 ~`~~ 3a 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reoorts and oral history): ~LE,~E REF'E2 7b sR'1PF~.('~ 27" 142 / .D. aZ-o~ it) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and hox they rill affect proposed uses: 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. Tnia should pzoyl de an adequate dearriptlon of the Bite in terms of ultimate uae which will result from the proposed project. Sndicate Sf Lhere ere prapoeed pheaea for development, the extent of deva lopment tv occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each SncremenC. attach additional sheet(s) if nece^anry: PLC-dsE RF~FE~ Zb s~a~Fi~ ~E./b~ Po12. G. ~. 92-02 ~~~ ~ 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical cr scenic aspects. Indicate the type of Sand use (residential, commerci ai, etc.), intensity o4 land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): 7al Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surroundi nq general area of the project? 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noLa to be generated, including source and amount. Nor rill thane noise lave la affect adjacent properties and on-airs uses. Whet methods o! sound proofing are pzopoeed~ ~~~~ •16) Indite to proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trace: NOtil~ ~~.. 5~ 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: 16) Zndi cats expected amount of water usage. (Sea Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, planes contact the Cucamonga County WateY DistY ict at 987-2591• A / /^ a. Residential (gal/dayl /Y/ee/k Tuee (gal/day) _ D. Connnezciel/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peek use (gal/min/ac) 19) indicate proposed method of sewage dispose 1. Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, nttaeh percolation taste. It di acherge to a sanitary savage system Sa proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (see Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarificstion, please contact the Cucamonga County Wnter District at 9e7-2591. a. Residential (gel/day) b• Industrial/COma:ercial (gal/day/ac) R69IDaPTIAL PPDJ6LTS N/ /L. 20) Number of residential units: ~~ Detached (indicate range of pnrcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot aiza: Attached findicete whether wits era rental or for sale units): '~~ sd 21) Anticipated range of sale prices artd/or tents: N/I Sale Pt!ee(s) 5 to S Rent (per month) 5 ` to $ 7.2) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 26) Indicate the expectad number of school children rho will be residing within the project: Contact ihs appropriate Sehool Diatriete as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: D. .TUnior Xi gh: c. Senior Xigh: CQlY~PCIAL, INDDBTRIAL AMD IN8TI7@rSCaUL pA[L76iL'P6 25) Describe type of use(s) and meior function(s) of commercial, indueer ial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, induetrlal, at institutional uses by type: 1.~ 7 27) Indicate hours of operation: 25) number of employees: Toea1: Maximum shift: Time of Maximum shift: 29) Provide braekdovn of anticipated job claaeificatlona, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each class ificntion (attach addi tionel sheet if ne ceaea ryl: 30) •3t) For covmercial and industrial aces only, Sndlcate the sour ce, Gype and amount of air pollution emissions. (Rata should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Menegament Olatrict, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PRDJECfB J2) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their abl lily to provide adequate service Lo the proposed project? If so, please indicate their reswpo/nse~./ ~/.~~ r ~ ~y0/~(~ lid' 7 Ya~TrL~C/ l~8 Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or di schnrga of hazardous and/or tonic materia ls~ Examples of hazerdoua and/or toxic materl als includer but are nos limited to YCH'a; ra dioactlve subs Lances; pesticides and herbicides; fue 1, oils, solvents, and other flammble liquids and gases. Also, note underground storage of any of the ebove• Please lint she materials and describe their u9e, storage, and/oz di echarge er. the property, as well as the deice of use, _` known. hIDAI~ KnldWl~~ 34) will the proposed Froject involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or diecharga of hazerdoua and/oz toxic mtariais. including but no[ limited to those examPle• listed abooe7 Zf yea, provide an inventory of all such mterials Co De used and proposed mthod of disposal. '1me loceLion of each ueaa, along with the atoregs and ehipmnt areas, shall be shown and lebsled on the application plane. I hereby certify that the •tatements furnished above and Sn the attached exhibi to present the data and Snformetlon required for adequate evalustion of this project to the bast of my ability, that tM facts, statements, and information preaentad are true and correct to Ghs bast of my knowledge and belief. I further undststand ghat additional information my M required to be submitted before an adequate walwtlon can b• mG by Lhs City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 'L(J ~ALbi~"~/2 Signature: ~~''~~''----``~~~~ Title: /.?~ 5q ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (Part II - Initial Study) 1. 9ACICGHWRD 1) Project Name: }D O 2) Related file No.(e): y.D. 9'j l~z n 31 Applicant: ~RRY V.~N7161ER~ Fl"~ Aaareaa: 1G/3 N. EGe.LfD,4t/E. onrvlr2~o, a.o 9iT~v2 Telephone No.: QQ ~j - 4'32 4) Representative: _SGIGYLI Address: Telephone No•: 5) Project accepted as complete (date): II. 6NVZR'OIa~VTAL I2fPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, explanation of the potential project impacts identified as "Yee" or "Maybe^ are required on attached eheeta. Explanation shall also be provided in each inatence where a potontially a1gnSPlcant effect hoe been determined not io be significant and is marked "NO". Yee Maybe No 1. EARTH. will the propoanl result in: a) tlnatable earth condi time or changes in geologic subs tructurea (including slope failures, subs Sdence, Ea llinq rock, etc. )7 ~/ b) Substantial di szuption, di aplacement, compaction or overcovering of the so117 _~ c) Major change in topography or ground surface relief features, eo that the general slope and iay of land sill bn / aignif icently modified]/~~ V .- - 5h C I T Y o f R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Yes !Maybe No .i) The dea traction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physiral features? \/ e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either or off the site? / f) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such ae earingvakea, landau dea, mudslides, ground failure, / or similar hazards] 2. Ai R. will the proposed result Sn: a) An increase in air pollution levels in the area in excess of existing air pollution standards] (particulnie matter (duet) ae well ae chemical polluianta should be considered.) / b) The creation of obiectionnble odors] __ / c) the alternticn of air movement, moisture, or [emperature or any change in climate, either loeal ly oz regionally] 3. WATER. will [he proposal result in: a) The poaefbi lity of conteadnatinq a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water? ~~ b) The conetructfon of etracturee oz dieturbence of a flood plain, marsh or watercouz997 c) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runof t7 ___ ~ _~ d) Alterations to the course or flow of flood wa[era? e) Alteration of the direction or rote of flow of ground waters] _. ___ ~ f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdraw Ls, or through interceptions of an aqulfar by cute or excavations] / ~' ,__ 5i d 5 Yes Maybe No g) Substantial reduction in the amount of eater otherwise available for public water supplies? h) Exposure of people or property tc / water related hazards such as / floodi ng7 PLANT LIFE. WL 11 the proposal result in: a) A aubsiantial change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plans (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micraflora, and aquatic lants)? p b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c) Introduction of nee apetiee of plants Snto an area, or results Sn e barrier the norms? repleniahmant of existing aped es7 d) Reduction in acreage of any aqr icultural crop? e) Th re l f t 7 _/ e mova o any reea y ANIMAL LIFE. Wil] the proposal result in: al A significant change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animnla (birds, lend enlmela including reptiles, fish and she? ?fish, benthic organisms or inaecis)? ~ _/ b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, raze or endangered species / of animala7 V c) Introduction of new species of animals into the area, or result in n barrier to the migration or movement of anlmala7 d) 6eterioretlon to the sxiatin9 fish or wildlife hebi tat? ( I v Yes Maybe No 5. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Significant inczea 9e in ambient noise levels for adjoining areasP ~/ b) the creation of dwelling units for which [he interior and/or exterior ambient noise levels exceed Federal, State or City noise guide lin es7 c) Exposure of people to serve noise / levels? ~ _, ~. LIGHT AND GLARE- WS11 the proposal result in: a) The generation of ligh_ or thermal pollution detectable from adjacent properties? b) The generation of new light or gleze7 8. LAND USE. Will the project result in: a) A disruption in the orderly, planned development of the areal _/ b) An inconsistency with the plane and goals that have been adopted by the / City? ~_ `/ c) A significant change Sn the present land use, pattern, scale or character of the general area? e / 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: el ^.'he diaplecement or alteration of any unique natural or mnn-made fenture7 / b) An alteration in the potential use, extraction, o: conaerva tian of e / scarce or unique natural resource? __ __ c) Increase in the rate of use of any / natural resources? ~ _ d) Subetantiel deple tian of any non- renevnble natural reaourcee7 ~~ V ~~3 ~ Yes !7aYbe No 10 . COMMUNITY. Will the project reault in: a) The displacement of community reside nt sJ b) Opposition of controversy within the - neighborhood or the community as a whole? ~ c) A detrimental effect on the community - - due to an inaufficlent market? d) An undesirable precedent which wossld promote or fac111tate other projects that would create significant impacts - on the environment? _3•L/ - e) An alteration in the locntlon~ distribution, density oz growth rote / of the human population of an arse? .~, L/_ - f) A detrimental effect on the existing housing oz create a demnd for / adds tlonal hauaingJ __ _/ 11. TRANSPORTATION/cIACULATION. WS11 the proposal reault in: e) Generation of substantial nddl tional vehicular movemeni7 / -/ b) Etfecta on exi sting parking fact litiea, or demand for new parking? ~ c) Substantial impact"upon existing transportation systems? __ / d) Alterations to present pattarna of ci zculation or movemen[ of people j and/or goods? V e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traf fic7 / f) Incree9e in traffic hezarda to motor vehiclea~ bicycli eta oz pedestriane7 (i~ ~'G Yes Maybe No 12. PVBL IC SERVICES. Will the project result in: a) The premature provision of public services to the extent that service costs exceed benefits derived from / the prof ect7 ~_ b) An alteration in existing and/or proposed services foz any section of / the City? ~_ c) The on-site disposal of solid oz liquid wastes? ~_ _ d) A change in oz a need for new or eltered g9Ve tllmental 9e rV1Ce9 in any of the following areas: 1) File Protection? ,_ 2) Fb lice Protectionl ,_~ 3) Schools? __ 4) Parka/recreational facilities? 5) Maintenance of public facilities, including roeds7 ~_ 1/- / 6) Other governmental services? 13. ENERGY. Will the propoeel result Sn: a) The use of subs taniial amounts of fuel or energy2 ^_ ,/ b) Substantial incraeee in demand upon existing sources of energy, ar require the development of new sources of ~ energy? _ 14. mPI[,ITIES. Will the proposal result in: a) A need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utili rice: / 1) Power or ^ntural gae7 _! __ 2) Communications eYatemel _ 3) We te[7 ,__ __ d) Sewer and eewege treatment? __ y S) 15. 16 17 18 Yea Maybe No 51 _ Stows waynr drainaga2_ -,~ ~- may,.«. ,y.~-~_ )/ S d di l / / spos a o Si waste T 61 RECREATION/OPEN SPACE. Will the project result in: a) An encroachment into any recreational area or an area proposed as open space by the City or any other jurisdiction] V b) An impact upon the quality or quantity of existing or planned recreational opportune t'_ea] CULTURAL AEEOORCE3. Will the piopoeal result in: a) The alteration of or tha destruction of a prehistoric or his tonic archaeological site? ~ - b) Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a historic building, structure, or object? ~/_ c) The potential to cause a physical change which would effect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal reeitict existing reli gloue or sacred uses within the potential impaci areas? ,~~ AESTHETICS. WS11 the pYopoaal result Sn: a) The creation of an aenthetlcelly affenaive a1[e open to public vier? SAFETY. Will the proposed project result in: a) TTe creation of an adverse or hazardous condi Liana should a landslide, earthquake, flood, or other natural di vaster occur? _~ b) The application, use or disposal of potenGia lly hazardous materials? __ sh Yes Mayhe No c) A risk of an explosion or the release cf hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, of 1, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? __ ,_/ dl Expos urn cf people to potential health hazar ds7 _ el Possible interference with an nmergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? ~_ 19. MANDAPOAY FINDINGS DF SIGNZF ICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, 9ubatantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below below self auataining levels. threaten to eliminate a plant oz nnimal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or elt~^lnate important examples of the major periods of California history of prehis GOry? V 6) Dcea the projeM hove the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadventa ge of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively briet, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will Endure well into the future.) ,_/ c) Does the project hove impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively conalderable7 (A project may Smpect on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the efface of the total of those impacts on the environment fe significant.) V d) Do ea the project have environmental of Eacte which will caa ee substantial adverse of facts on human beings, / eithei directly or lndi rattly? __ _~_ ~~ III. DISCOSSIdB OP RIVIAONgRTAL EVALNASION (Attach additional sheets with narrative descziption of environmental impacts.) y ~T~1'/~~~~'D :3'~IPQ-RjYf,~ {"~f.L ~"~L[;~jy!¢ /S~ 2S ~'UMtd~ IV. OHT6101TMATION ' (TO be completed by the Laad Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project CODLD NOT have a significant ef.`eet on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLAAATION WTLL HE PREPARED. Z find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not De a eignSficant effect in this case because the mliSgation meaeur<s described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL 8E PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant of Cact on the envir nt, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REpUIRED. ZO Au~IUS'I-qZ --~e~e Slgnai rrye~ Pcr l i ~ !n ~ ,~[+Jli lint J/Ll/j'li n.i (~-~ i ~8 s~ RESOLUTION NO. 92-04 A REEOLVTZIXJ OF Tk0': HISTORIC PRE SERVATIGN COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CGCAMONGA, CALI£ORN IA, RECOMMENDING APP PPVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION N0. 92-02 TO DESIGNATE THE PEA.RRON/RTEVENS FZLLTNG STATION AND GARAGE, LJCATED AT 12912 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORICAL LANDMARK - APN: 1100- 061-02 A. Recitals. (i) The City of Fa ncho Cucamonga has filed an application for Landmark Desi gnation No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter rn this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application." (iiI On August 25, 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. H. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined end resolved by the Historic Preserve tien of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. 'this Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fact9 act forth in the Recitals, Part '•A," of this Reaoluti on are true end correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 2 ace es of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 12912 Foothill sou lesard. 3. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Coamiission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 25, 1992, including written end otal staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamongn Municipal Code, this Covmission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: Representing both the Etiwanda nitnls community and the importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore, the structure harkens back to an era of agricultural growth and mass western migration. Offering fuel, mechanical services, and often a helping hand, the station and as owners were an important part of the local area. i ~f 9 ~ x~,lbr~,,,~~1 NPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-04 LD 92-02 - PEAASON FSLL'_NG STATION August 25, 1992 Page 2 F indihq 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once comraor, but is now rate. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rate. Fact: Gas stations and garages from the early age of the automobile were a prominent feature of many local landscapes, including the Etiwarda area. Most of these roa daide stations and gars gas have fallen out of use or been abandoned or demolished. with their loss, physical reminders of the everyday patterns that characterized coamunity life sixty years ago are fading. F in ding ]: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Fact: Opening shortly after the completion of Route 66 in 1926, the Pearson Filling Station and Garage is on¢ of the oldest such structures extant. Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renown or important or a local personality. Fact: The Pearson family was and is deeply connected with the cultural and familial fabric of Etiwande history. Finding 5: The builder or architect was important. Fact: Builder Henry Rlusman was one of the more ealented, competent, and significant local builders to mark the pages of this area's history books. B. Historic Architectural antl Engineering Significance. F inding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods need in the pzeposed landmark are unusual or 9ignif rcant cr uniquely effective. Fact: The reserved, vernacular ezpreseion of the very popular Spanish Revival architectural style demonstrates local interest in broadeY stylistic trends. .,. Ne?ghborhocd and Geographic Setting. Finding 7: The propoa^_d landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact: At the Foo[hi 11 Boulevard and Etiwande Rvenue intersection, the station is tta only remaining link to an lmportart element of local history and to en epoch of our ~' NPC RESOLVTION N0. 92-04 LD 92-02 - PEAASON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 3 national experience. Without it, all Fhysical traces of that portion of Route 66 will be lost. Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, rep resents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, o: city. Fact: Fox aver 65 years, the Pea raon Filling Station and Garage has been a community resource and its owners, the Pearsons, Stevens, and Myers to name a Eew, added to the communal experience of the Etiwanda area. 4. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on Augnst 25, 7992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Se^_tion 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and pursuant to the Commission policy regarding landmark deei gnation over an owner's objection, this Commission hereby makes the follnwing findings and facts: A. It is the policy of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cur_amonge to override the objection of an owner in recommending landmarY. designation when: Finding 1: The property is on the City's Hiatori cal Inventory Fact: Staff hea reviewed the structure and listed it as a Potential Local Landmark (PLL), Potent Sal State Lan $nark (PEL ~, and Potential Listing on the National Register of Nistoric Places (PNA). Finding 2: The property stands out as having outstanding historical, architectural, cultural, and/or aesthetic aigniEicance. Fact: The important place of the citrus industry to ovr local ac ea and, on a broader scale, of Route 66 and the westward migration Sn the 1930x, are evidenced by this modest, architecturally-intact comm~unity resource. Finding 3: Designation could help protect it. Fact: As a local landmark, any subsequ¢nG alterati on8, including demolition, would have to be reviewed fully by the Conmission. 5. Tnis Commiasion hereby finds that the project. has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environ_menCal quality Act of 1970, and this deei gnation ie exempt from CEQA under Art is le 19, Section 15350. X51 HPC RESOLUTION N0. 92-04 LD 92-02 - PEAASON FILLING STATION August 25, 1992 Page 4 6. Haled upon the findings and conclusions set Forth in pars graphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of August 1992, of this Landmark Designation application. 7. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992. I By: arsha Meek Bert airma AYES: ARNHA, HANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMI VP, TSHHIER NOSH: NONE ABSENT: HAH RV ITZ --~ d- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC,A HISTORZC PRESERVATION COMMI ^u SIGN MINl.^TES Special Meeting August 25, 1992 Chairman Marsha Hanks called the special meeting of the City cE Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Cioic Center, 10500 Civic renter Drive, Reecho Cucamonga, California. Cnairman Hanks then led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Me li cent Azner, Marsha Hanks, Gene Billings, Ada Cooper, Hob Schmidt, Anne Teenier COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: Alan Raekvitz STAFF PRESENT: Barrye Nanaon, Sr. Civil Engineer, Anthea Rertig, Anaocinte Planaert Larry Henderson, Principal Planned Scott Murphy, Associate Planners Shelley Petrel li, Secretary wrm+.rr weewruc A. CONSIOEAATION OF A THE NORTNEAET CORNER OF ETINANDA AyERUE anu ewrn:u, awua.avwxu - xrc: 1100-161-02 - Ccnsideration and detezmi m[SOn of the historic status, application for Point of Interest or Landmark Designation, range of appropriate prajact alt ernativee, and level of appropriate mitigations for the partial demolition of the structure. The actions and recommendatlone include the fo11ow1ng: Landmark statue, Point of Interest statue, other project alternetivea, and/or mitigation measures prior to devn li tlon. An eh ea Nartig, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Tessier asked if the traffic signals were already located in the ultimate location. HPC MINUTES ~~ '1 -1- August 25, 1992 5 ,1 11 E X h'1 b 1-1" c Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, replied that temporary signals had been installed approximately half-way between where the signals used to be and where they would be located ultimately. Chairman Banks asked for clarification on the concern regarding endangerment of pedestrians from traffic at the intersection of Eiiwandn Avenue and Foothill Boulevard because there seems to be little, if any, pedestrian traffic ac the location. Barrye Hanson, Sr• Civil Engineer, stated this is a concern the property owner brought up, but it had not yet been substantiated by the Engineering Division. Commissioner Cooper questioned why the improvements to the intersection would need to be comp feted prior to widening Foothill Boulevard. Mz. Hanson, stated that it is standard policy to finish off intersections at their ultimate location to ensure the hardware gets placed in the proper poe ition. Chairman Hanks opened the public hearing. Harry Vantage r, 2177 N. tat Avenue, Upland, one of the property owners, stated that because of a aeries of events beyond their control (the development of wa/-Mart and the eventual widening of Foothill Boulevard), they feel they hove been placed in n precarious pasiiion as tar ae development or demolition of the building on their property Sa concerned. He stated the property Ss currently in use as a commercial operation. He also coa®ented that they eventually want to develop the property, but they cannot do anything until a flood control di atr ici Se developed for the area. He remarked that they are in favor of deno ll tion because they feel St will occur eventually to make room for the widening of Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard). He atetnd he thought it would be better to remove the boil ding now and reconstruct it later with new materials (restoring it to its original Look) and Ghat they would be willing to do that. Coamu ssioner Schmidt asked if temporarily fencing the canopy with chain link fence would help the current traffic situation of care cutting through the canopy. Mr. Vantiger responded St would reeGrict hie current tenant's access to the building and it Se only a temporary eo lotion. Gary Womak, 5366 Evening Canyon Nay, Rancho Cucamonga, real ee tare broker, stated he hoe been working with the Gemmel family on property during the rezoning from reaiden[Sal to coomtercial. Ne stated they favored the commercial zoning because the surrounding area is commercially zoned and they fell that [es idnntial zoning of their property ree out of piece. He further commented they felt pedestrian traffic would inereaae on the property when the new shopping center Ls complete rhich Ln turn rould create a greater liability Eor them. He suggested leaving the building !n tact, ngving the canopy to the beck of the building, and recone trotting the canopy lacer. He stated that, if HK MINUTES '~ ~ -2- August 25, 1992 the property is developed eventually, they will incorporate the building into the development at the time. He said, with the canopy being in the way of the ultimate right-of-way, it will likely result in the cancellation of the owner's liability insurance which will then prohibit having a tenant in the building and result in a loss of incocc to the pro pezty owner. He commented they expected increased traffic in the area because of the shopping center and they would like to get the street and intersections widened now to accvvmvdate that traffic. Chairman Banks asked if the owners of property have developed any concepts on what they will do with the property later. Mr. Womak stated that they hed two or three preliminary site plans done when the property was rezoned and all of them utilized the building on tha site. Ne stated buildings on corners have good visibility and he felt the building ;ould be rehabilitated. Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tessier said she thought moving the canopy to the bac'~ could work and it would keep the building in tact. Chairman Banks clarified that if the canopy were moved to a position that did not face Route 66, the building would no longer qualify for National Register status. She stated if the entire building and canopy were moved together directly north (facing Route 66) St would 8[111 qualify. Commissioner Arner stated she would not want the building io lose any of its authenticity. She also said she thought it cou Ld be a good tourist resource. Commii ssion er Billings stated he had concern over moving the building and asked if it could even be done. Larry Henderson, Pzinci pal Planner replied it was possible, but it would be very expensive. Commissioner Cooper commented she thought Ne street widening should De completed prior to altering Che intersection, Chairman Hanks stated eh< was pleased [het the applicant recognized the structure ae an historic structure and was considering incorporating it into some development on the property. She expeeeaed that she thought a mutually acceptable solution could be worked out between the City and the applicant. She had spoken to some of the historical Eaml lies in the Etiwnndn area and she had been told of their involvement in the Route 66 celebration. She was also informed that this fili ing station was considered quite unique and special by Aoute 66 historians. She stated that it was her feeling the the station had sl gnif icon ce, to both the City and the applicant, and wished to explore the possibility of obtaining National Register status. She remarked that adaptive reuse of the building was definitely poe Bible. XPC MINUTES -l- Auquet 25, 1992 / 55 MdfI ON: Moved by Schmidt, seconded by Arner, unanimously carried 6-0-i, to recoamend to City Council approval of Landnark Desi gnation 92-D2, the Pearson /Stevens Filling Station and Garage. Motion carried by the following vote: A'.'E5: COMM ISSIONERE: ARNEA, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, ECHMIDT, TESSIER NOES: COMtIS5I0N ER5: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HASKV ITZ -carried Coamissioner Tessier asked what would happen if the signal poles were not moved now. Mr. Murphy stated that the Commission had the option of leaving the poles in the interim location and then, upon development of the property, relocating oz moving the 6ui lding when the poles are moved to their ultimate location. Mz. Henderson stated Ghat leaving the poles in the interim location creates no changes in traffic, liability, etc. Commis ai ~~er Tessier asked if a temporary Derm could be installed to discourage traffic ftaa cutting through the property, via the canopy. Mr. Murphy stated an asphalt curbing could be installed temporarily to eliminate the traffic problem; it would also allow access to the tenant currently conducting bus ineae in the building. Chairman Banks asked who wov ld 6e paying for the focused Envi ronmentel Impact Report (EIRE. Mr. Henderson replied that it would paid for either by the owner on the northeast corner or 6}' Foothill Marketplace property owners. Chairman Hanks commented that she did not want to back the curzent owners into a corner regarding peyi nq Eor en EIA, etc. because they are not currently ready to develop the property. She felt improvements could wait until they were ready to develop. Commissioner Cooper asked if the insurance company would continue to provide coverage for the but lding if the ultimate street improvements were not made now. Mr. Henderson stated the City has received no documentation from the insurance company indicating they would cancel cove rays. He remarked Ghat fencing the property seemed to be a viable alternative because there is enough area on the site to accommodate circulation and access tc the current tenant. He stated proper placement ~ OE gates would ae cure the property ea well as eliminate the traffic pro67em. NPC MINUTES / ~ ~ -A- August 25, 1992 Chairman Banks stated she thought two-sided fencing would work io eliminate the traffic also. Mr. Hende zson 6aid he did not think it nas been demonstrated that demolition i5 the only alternative. He commented staff wculd like to see further studies done on the Site. Commies toner Cooper asked if it was correct to assume that, if the signals were not moved now, Foothill Marketplace would not be paying for the street corner improvements when the are completed later end that owners of the filling station property would bare these cases totally. Mr• Henderson replied that was correct although the property owners would be responsible foY certain development coats whenever they developed their property. He stated that currently Foothill Marketplace is paying for the signals, curbs, gutters, asphalt, etc., and Lha filling station property owners would be responsible to pay to move the eignels. Chairman Hanks asked if Foothill Marketplace could set aside money Sn a trust and/oz bond to be used later to move the signal. Mr. Henderson said that Nae po9aiDle. earrye Aanaon, Sr. Civil Engineer, elated that City policy has always been to have the developer pay £or the total signal improoementa and then reimburse them with money from the tranepoztation fund. Re stated moat of the coat would be reimbursed to Lha developer• Re further stated that in cases of property owner resistance, that particular property owner would then bare the cost of the improvements when they developed their property later. MOTION: Moved by Arner, seconded by Schmid[, unnnimouely carried 6-0-1, to recommend to city Council that the ultimate street ai goal configuration be delayed and remain in the interim location until the property owner on the northeast corner is ready to develop their property and, if Council does noC wish to delay the ultimate locetlon of Lha signals, that a focused Environmental Impact Report and various other studies be prepared regarding the impact on the historic statue of the property. Motion carried Dy the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: APNEA, BANES, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIOT, TESSIER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AASENT: COMMISSI ONEPS: HASKVITZ -carried NPC MINOTES -5- August 25, 1992 /5 ~ September lo, 1992 CITF OF' RANCHO CliCAMONGA MEMORANDUM .. s:'r,'L.:. ~~ T0: Brad Buller, City Planner FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: SERYiCE STATION CANOPY - N.E. RNER ETIWANDA AVE. 8 FOOTHILL BLVD. This will review the results of a structural investigation conducted on September 10, 1992 to determine the feasibility of reloca tiny the above referenced structure. After removal of the exterior plaster in a number of critical locations and observations of the internal framework, I have reached the following conclusions. a) Nearly every connection and structural member would require replacement or reinforcement because of dry rot, obsolescence, or inadequate strength or stiffness. b) The structure is very unorthodox in construction compared to today's methods, using unconventional methods of assembly i.e. use of lag-screws for connections, splices at mid-span of members, use of corrugated cardboard as backing for stucco, etc. c) The exterior plaster, particularly in the ceiling plane is literally becoming detached from it's supports and will likely fall off if the canopy is moved, It also poses a degree of hazard to anyone beneath it, since traffic vibration could ultimately dislodge it. d) The roof is straight sheathed and will require replacement of the roof decking in order to attain lateral stability required under the codes today. e) The columns supporting the roof system are not properly braced to resist wind and earthquake forces. f) The roof covering will require replacement to provide grope- weather protection. g) The exterior stucco does not have a weather resistant barrier between it and the supporting framing, which would be required if moved to a new location. In light of the above conditions, it is my opinion that attempts to relocate the structure might very well result in it falling apart in the process; certainly, reconstruction would be much more feasible. ~~ u Xh'~ b'~ D MEMO: SERVICE STATION CANOPY - N.E. CORNER ET IWAN DA AVE. 8 FOOTHILL BLVD. September 16, 1392 Page 2 Considering the potential for someone to be injured in the event of dislodgement of the ceiling stucco, and the lack of barriers to prevent pedestrian or vehicular traffic underneath the structure, the current conditions of the structure constitutes a public nuisance and should be abated by fencing around the canopy, pending permanent solution to it's existence. I trust this provides the information you required. .1G:11 / 5 /~ RESOLUTION NO. (~/ ~1 _ ) / „~J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDFJ+RK DESIGNATION 92-02, THEREEY DESIGNATING REARSON FILLING STATION AND C;ARAGEr LOCATED AT 12912 ^OOTH ILL BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAILING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-061-02. WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Landmark Deai. gnation 92-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation is referred to as the "application"• WHEREAS, (h, August 25, 1992, the Historic Yrese rvation Commission of the City of Rancho CVCamon9a conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92-O d, thereby recovmending to this City Council that said application be approved. WHEREAS, on Octoher 7, 1492, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. WHEREAS, all legal pre requi sltes prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THF,REFORE, the City Ccwncil of the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as Eoll ows: BECTION 1: The appl!ca tion applies to property located at As aeasOY Parcel Number 1100-061-02. SECTION 2: Representing both the Etiwande ci true community and the importance of Route 66 to Ame riran culture and folklore, the strvcture harkens back to an era of agricultural grow[h and mass waste rn migration. Offering fue 1, mechanical ae rvices, and often a helping hand, the station and its owners were an important part of the local area. The proposed landmark meets the fallowing criteria estebli shed Sn Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a hietori cal pe rlod, type, style, re g!on, or way o£ life. 2. The proposed landmark Se en example of a type of building which was once common but is now rase. CITY CODNCIL RESOLUTION N0. PEARSON FILLING STATION October 7, 1992 Page 2 3. The propcsed Lattdma rk is of Greater aqe than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or a local personality. 5. The pr. oposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. 6. The architect or builder was imocttant. E. His tnric Architectural and Engineering Significance. 1. The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual or significant cr uniquely effective. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed Landmark, in Sts location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and City (ord. 70 S9, 1979). SECTION 3: Designation of a Landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Section 15308). SECTION 4: Ha sed on the substantial evidence rnceived and reviewed by this Council and based on the findln 4s Get forth above, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the designation of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Historic Landmark. DATE: October 7,1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor, Members of the City Counai Jack Lam, AICP City Manager FROM: Jerry Fufwood, Acting Community Services Duectot•N/ BY: Karen Matcham, Recreation Supervisor {~.~ti~i JJ7 ~~1~~1 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS ON FOUNDERS DA1' PARADE MODIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION J~aT~ ~4 .~ .. Recommend pursuit of suggested modifications for 1992 and 1993 with report back to City Council within four months. Approve contracts for Pageantry Production for amount of $6,368.89, and Alta i.oma HIgh School for $120.75 from fund 01-4532-3900- 4222-3650. i3ACKGROUND In an endeavor to continually improve ow annual parade, several ideas and changes are being recommended this year and fur subsequent years. This, our fifteenth annual Founders Day Parade, has as its theme "Fifteen Years of Life in the'Iti-Communities." The City has contracted with Pageantry Productions for the last two years to manage most of the activities associated with this event. The parade route for fourteen of the past fifteen years has started on Base Line Road at Vineyard and ended at Ramona. In 1990, the first year in which Pageantry Productions was contracted, the route was reversed to begin at Ramona and end at Vineyard. This change was at Pageantry's suggestion, but the lack of space and parking at the staging area plus the uphill climb between Lion Street and the Alta Loma High School convinced staff to return to the original starting place. Contrac!ing Pageantry Production has saved a great deal of pre-event activities, time, and costs particularly foe several full time Community Services staff members. Although we do provide some staff on the day of the parade, this number is much smaller than before. An informational cost breakdown is attached. One enhancement deals with encouraging residents to view the parade at specific locations. Hopefully this will have more viewers in the middle of the parade. Currently the average parade attendance, including participants, has been about IO,OW. FOUNDERS DAY PARAUE October 7, 1992 Page Two Staff is seeking to enhance the pazade's visibility and attendance over the next two years. The Commission's suggestions for the parade enhancements are now forwarded to the City Council for their approval since it wiB ultimately involve expending funds. •The parade of 1991 was enhanced by adding a third announcing booth. The posters, flyers and news releases will now indicate where the announcing booths will be located to encourage paztlapatlon at these sites. Attachment B shows these locations. •Pauta Pachon m work as a PR person to discuss the parade with service clubs, PTA's and youth sports council. •Insure applications are mailed to all schools, Chaffey College, PTA's, youth sports groups, servirn clubs, Boy and Girl Scouts, Camp Fire, YMCA, etc. •Considerations of new 1993 parade route, perhaps closer to the middle of town; which include meeting with engineering, police, fire, and maintenance on the feasibility and need for change. •Possibility of post-parade event at the new sports complex; possible activities: craft fair, rides, concert, etc. Also included with this staff report are two contracts. The first is with Pageantry Productions for $6,368.89. Through using a contractor, staff has been able to keep parade costs down and reduce city staff costs. The second contract is with Alta Loma I-iigh School to use the band room and rest rooms for parade participants, the cost is $120.75. Re ectfully Submitted, rry Fulwood, Acting Community Services Director JF:KM:ks Attachment ~ ~~ A CITY OF RADICHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT FOL'PIDERS DAY PARADE Costs 1988 - 1991 "Bicen*_ennial" "The Rancho" 1988 1989 (City) (Ciey).. Decorations 1,000.00 86,38 D*iscellaneous sunpiies 221.82 854,71 Pre-award music (none) (none} Staff "(at event) full time 13 16 part time I 868.40(22 1,146.31(26) Staff (pre-event) full time 10 part time 263. 39(5) Annlicatione 392. 31 Give-awavs/ buttons 1.064. 97 Ribbons (none) News advertise. 980. 00 Fliers/posters 496. 95 Banner - Dignitary signs 419. 76 Judges 1,248. 00 Trophies 3,500. 00 Toilets 80. 00 P.igh school rental n/c P"A. rental Contract, cost TOTAL 10,536.10 13 384.98(5) 113.13 1,335.60 (none) 1,135.00 524,51 649.78 1,248.90 4,542.40 110.00 150.00 75.00 ,356,70 *Contractor's costs ~/nosters only, fliers donated "Salute to the Past" "Bill of P.igh 1990 1991 .(.contract.) (Contract) 1,000.00 66,26 350,00 6 354.67(7) 3 506.56(5) * 407.46 16,86 250.00 6 436.60(1 3 527.340 * (none) yr 482,22 450.00 * * 100.00 not used 9,615,75 2,425.26 (none) * 119.60 592,62 1,360.00 donated 119.00 6,368.84 10.198.37 ~~ 6 ~~ iL•' rrno Iz P ~~ ti Q~ ~L~~ ~~~ 0 '~ ~ ~ J ~~ z° ~; ~J~:~ wTMa ~ ~ ~i ~ ~z~~ ~~ '~~a ~ I z ^ v l~5 4 C z ., y~~ O D a Q r+ fil O a J Z w 3 4 W N h PRDDU`ilONS' - ~~~ PARADES] FESTNALS July 28, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTENTION: KATHY SORENSON RE: 15TH ANNUAL FOUNDERS DAY PARADE 11904 LONG BEACH BLW. PARTIES/CONVENi70N5 LYNWOOD, CA 90262 (310) 5374240 FAR (370) 631-1734 We at Pageantry Productions hereby agree to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga in produdng !hair 15th Annual Founders Day Paratle on Saturday, November 14, 1992. We agree to assist you with the use of our most up to date mailing list to obtain entdes for the day of parade. Wo at Pageantry will provide the lollowing: 6' Musical Sweepstakes Award Grand Marshal Award Division Marshal or FeaNred Rider Avrbrds (N narr_ssary) Float Sweepstakes Award Mayors Award Tall Flag Sweepstakes OdN Teem Sweepstakes Equestrian Sweepstakes City Award Aq necessary 1st, 2nd, 3rd place awards for up to 45 dosses 41h and Sth plow awards in band dosses F.M. communications for day of parade .QI~ nP!`A$4Rnr Dortid!1am ypDlflp$ DR35O3 All nawssary unN numbers and pins for day of parade StaN Announwr for day of parade SWN for parade dick-in, lormallon and parade starter , A Pageantry representatYe to a6entl a!1 necessary paratle meetings Printing of one'co;erparade~apPlications Postage for'mailing Df app!icstions, levers of acceptanw and rejecflons Obtain 8 ProNde 8 Vehides for OignNary Use ~ , Provitle 9 sets of signs for Dignitary vehidas, , Contad & AnangO for Southern Calilomia Schooi Band and Orrhesha Assodation 8 A Professional Equestrian Jutlga. (0.1ako city award of costs of above judges fees and how to make out dlecks to pay (or lees, checks to be delivered to Pageantry personnel on morning of paratle.) ~~~/I PAGEANTRY PROD(ICTIOI`[S ~ ~ ~ °' ~~ 1~~ PROP `r10N5'~~.+~~f ~:S -~ PARADFS,rFESTNALS Pageantry Staff will: PAGFAnTRY PROD(ICTTOPIS ~(\\/d~~ ~ °° \J~ 11904 LONG BEACH BLVD. PAR'11FS/CONVElYT10N5 LYNWOOD, CA 902fi2 (370) 537-0240 FAX (310) 631-1134 Mail all applkstlore Process all returned appNcatrons Prepare and maA aN letters of acceptance, perode nrapa and passes Arrawer aA calls to our oMCe horn partldpams, judges, and local agencies Srpply Parade Judges wi4 aN necessary paperwork Formulate parade Mo-up Write parade script Provde necessary line-ups and maps for day of parade Provide award sheets for parade judgklg rasuNs Provide all nec~RSary dkeclbrrel signs for famagan area Provide Staff Anrratmcer fa awards cererrwny M addabn Pageantry wIH provkle the 15th Annual Fartlde/s Day Parade vAtlt an upgraded troPhY padtage. TAIs wll proWde you v4tlr the oversized loss tropNes filet ere larger then our standard package. We wdl also provltle rosette style, 3 streertrer rlhtons, in keeping wNh the tlleme of the parade fa City Sfalf arW Parade Dignhadea (up to 50 pieces). TOTAL COORDINATPIO PACKAGE AND SERVICES....j6,368.89 r ~~ aaoou~rions~, ~~ PARADES/FFS7IVALS SUMMARY OF COST"S PAGFAIY't'RY PRODtICT[ONS ~~d ~°~ ~~ 11904 LONG BEACH BLVD. LYNWOOD, CR 90282 (310) 537-0240 FAX (310) 631-1734 PARADE CONTRACT PRR4TR40 PARADE APPLICATIONS ONE COLOR POSTAGE FOR MAILINGS 8 ACCEPTANCE 8 REJECTIONS S VIP CARS @45.00 EA S SETS OF VIP SIGNS@59.00 PLUS TAX TOTAL COST PARTIES/CONVENTIONS 55,400.00 52'75.00 PLUS 21.31 TAX 5235.00 S38G.00 572.00 PLUS 5.58 TAX 56368.89 ~~ psooucrions~~ A ", C~ PAGEANTRY PRODQCTIONS ~~ ~ °~~ PARADES/FESTNALS 11904 LOBO BEACH BLVD. PAR17F5/COM/ENf10ryS LYNWOOD, CA 40262 (370) 5374240 FAX (310) 631-1134 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RE: 15TH ANNUAL FOUNDERS DAY PARADE You hereby agree to perlorm the lollowing: Parade Pre-HOSting I« Dlgnatariea Portable restroans in the lormatlon, disbanding arM judging emas DislribWe appilcadone to local entries Distribute all press releases to bcal newspapers Ac! as Nascn be!waan !ccal servira dubs businesses. dN agendas and Pageantry Acquire the Paratle t3rarltl Marshal clear ail necessary penrifs, mules erM IadINMs Artange f« adequate reviewing end lunpirg stands, wnh elecakal power, tables and Blahs tar day of parade Suppy addNlonel stall manpower ~Y ~ Parma Arrerlge and ~rY necessary htsurerrce Anarge f« Awards Ceremony area wNh (2) g'tades and P.A. system Coordinate t« aN tormatlon, parade route and disbanding areas to be posted wNh'ra parkhtg' signs Provide portable restraonts in the tomtatlon, disbanding and )udghtg erase WE PROPOSE TO FURNISH LABOH AND MATERIALS - COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASOVE SPECIFICATIONS, AND SUBJECT TO CONDRpNS FOUND IN THIS AGREEMENT FOR THE 3UM OF: ($6,368.89) PAYMENT AS FOLLOWS: PAYMENT IN FULL DAY OF?A ADE NOVEMBER 14 1 ~ ACCEPTED. The ebwa prices, apedflcatbns end wMitbns HE9PC-CTRALV 3l1&drTl'EU a:s setietectory enri ere rrora~y ea:optad. 'Yuu era amn.eiz,:d lV.^L., v;,^,E SPC-C~AO::_A~. ^:^.. to do the work ee aWdfled. Payment wiN be made as d/b/e PAaFANTRV pRO0l1CT1t7N6 oufllrred above. ~ '/ DATE OF ACCFPTANO~_ BY _ ~ ~elj' ALTA LOtlA dICH~SCROOL 8880 daeeline Road Alta Loma, California 91701 (714J 989-5511 ext. 206,207 Paul Nard, Principal Larry tlarchan t, Asst. Principal Ron Bc4ert, Asst. Principal Carol Pounger, Admin. Ass t_ Dace: / l-U..7Y. ~ !r / / / -Z~ Ir. account cri th Address: _„~-'«~'l.J //~~.L~-s,r.--- >~_ . 9~9 -1~s'8~ ~ C, , ~ 9/7a 5 - 007 r p ~.on .rac,. Nc.: 3 e~~ / Fersonnei~ __ to ar_ Technician C+ $ nor hour X ~ _ ~ _ ..^;ta ¢e Assistant R t per hour X __ ~. :;,.s tcdian ~m S ~ ~ , ~ per hour X ~ _ ~Q_Z..S Rental: .. Facility Hours 0 S~_U for first hour ~~~ ~/~ .2~ and S ~, for additional hours = _ E:ce mP t' Yes ~ no Total Cost: S /a~- 7f M.;i.e _:.__ car~a bl. .,,, "h~_~e•; ~ioint Union 'r. i.ah School Di ari^t" .4LL EEE.^: MUST EE 29ID a9 HOgRS IN ADVANCE OF FACILITY DSE. F leash shcv faci-''y ::°= :ontract number and account name an the ^_k. :;on'.ract numbez is shown abe~e. Chaffer Joint Union High School District Desn Smothezs, Superintendent ~~~ CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Date X14__, 15- 92 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES namheuon NO. N° 3229 Nature or Type Name of Organ¢atlon Of'tY of~__~76'asnon~_______ of Organization_ RnCreation Authorizetl Name_~ren Mdtchrn: __ Title PdrddO COOTYl1PdtOr Representative of Organlzauon Address F.O~Box 80~RaxM C11carLMncia, CA 91729-0807 phone No. 989-1858 ' S;mat crtv - zle cnae LIABILITY AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEt^ENT Applicant hereby agrees to be responsible for any damages sas(a toed by any land, twildings. furniture or equipment because of the occupancy of the premises. It Is further agreed that all appllcablc rules, regulations and policies of the school dis[rict governing board vlill be atlhered to as well as enforced. Applicant further agrees m indemnify and save harmless the Chaffer .iomt Union Hlgh School District, its officers and employees from and against any IiabiliUes imposed oFOn saitl school dish ict which result as a consequence to the performance of rhos agreement. AUYHGRl2E0 RFPRfSENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE Hlgh School Requestetl~ A7 to It'lsk3 Fiir~l School __, ` Purpose nr i Nature of Use pOtlt>d2L5 ()ay pyradE d Anticipated No. I Will admissmn fees be charged or of Attendance ~ collections or donations accepted? Building ur Facil ity_ FdS~St & Ves ^ Will meeting or use be none><clusive Yes No ® and open [o public? No Nnt Proceetls to be used for __- _..__ -., Datel sl and 71me!sl Requested: Sketch of seating or stage arrangement desned. Uat¢ _ll/_14197rs. from 7s~Q_A M to 1`00 _._ P M Dale .-___ Hrs. !rpm ~_ M :o M S~saaV Restlroan Maintenance Requested Oate ______ Hrs from - M to _~_ _- M Date _- Hrs. from ._ __ M ro -____.__ M I Electricity for East/West Parking Lots Regular Weekly or Monthly Mes!mg. _._ Beg:^nng Oate__..,___.=Ending Date _`__ _~ Payment fOi CIiStIXli gl SCNiCES L'EC3ltllZ'd - ?n arisrarsro. Requests im Spec•al Equipment I ^ Ricers ^ Chairs ^ Piano ~_ P. A. System ^ Flags ^ Lec;em j _ Projection Equipment ^ Tables ^ Other I Requests for Cafeteria Uses J Use for m¢ebng purposes? Yes ^ No ^ Are refreshments to be served> Yes ^ Nc ^ Snncial Schnul P¢rsonnal Requested CUStodian (7 iu'S. ) Part llty Clearance' Auditoriom_-.-_--_ Libra _ ~_ R¢n[al Fee $ Exempt ^ Cafeteria.___,_ G neat _ ____ Salary q 120.75 Approved by Other $ ~ inh cinal o epnsentaHvl--~- TOTAL 5 120.75 Not approved due to ___ --___-____ Date Paid .. .. .19 NOTE: antal ree usr a~n an onus aevanre, nn r^rmer "-'----""-" "'--' '- -'-"--"-'----'-' wnl nn .nnonen r eceor m. aneiuonai nn~argas nit ~ ame : mn ~ u rma nave rnma.M ^av+ew m cmr4v amm canon sego scnnweDnnid anu sane ro scone mm~q urea. canoe-~ Scnoororflu cogv ~~~-'~ _~n"^<Iw o~ aeernenlrtiw ---~- Yelbw - blttnctl CnoY I Clnk -' W C~ k COOP ty6t 0416x)91 Gnlannraa-SSW aan(Stor+GOev GrBe ~-~ P.OOliunt'r Copy `YVILLO~~VS Community C~iurcFi Evange!ua! free Churches of America "7N~ G,Rp'Wf~(C Tc_ac'i;" adr(r4a. losol Church 3uiu 300 7Q(~ncho Cucamonga, CaCifornio 91730 plume: 17ra' 9R9 R55,i pastors: 7mntt ~firt6(ey '11aeK 7KmRan September 25, 1992 Mayor & Cdy Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Cemer Drive Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. Dear Mayor 8 Ciry Council: Recemry ota church has filed a request to add a kindergarten through 6lh anode school to our aleady-approved church and school under CUP 9f -17, located at 10601 Church Street. We did rrot understand [he need for modification, bul complied w@h the City Planners spinion, and reantarrty paid the $435 processing fee, being pracDcaNy promised a positive conclusion. Otv citys Planning Commission reversed the Crty Planners ra-orrrneMalion to appove such a modification. We have attempted to offer lather consideratlor~s tar the Planning Commisson, Aphough they have openetl the issue for dRCUSSion az the tDgober 14 Plamrirg Commisson Hearing, in the process they Dave impae0 [hat npthirg new has been presented to change their view. Would iS be possible fM the City CWrrcil t0 add this issue t0 thefr agarda a< the October 7 n1BBlig9 Wdbvrs Commurrity Church and the tamiFes attertclrg Wise Oak Scholl are in a state of prolonged confusbn over the eventual outcane of this impasse. We are hopkg that somehow we can express our concern end give the Chy Cour!cil an opportunity to respontl arcs Delp us arrive ar a mutualy agreeable condusbn of the maser. WAbws Community Chtvch and Wise Oalc Setwol have been serving this canmunity to 70 years and 15 years resps,'tivey. The Chump has ollerred its facilfies to use Dy Chaffee Community College, Chaffee Adult Schools, CenDal Scholl District, Coyote Canyon Elememary School, Arise Araderny of the Arts, the Cky Probation DeparlmeM, the Chamber of Commerce, and various camnunNy and scholershp grouts, Wise Oak Scholl has eouratetl many fine ciDiens, anrktalty appeared in the Grape Harvest Festival, won trophies in the Founder's Parade, and prottdty represented this cRY around [he rtatbn. We pray that we can sanehow continue to serve, far the bettermer4 of the residents of this floe cAy. Sincerely Yours, ' ,~.~~7 Forrest Hindley / 17a L11 Y VY KANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7, 1992 ~ ~~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Cou nc~il '° Jack Lam, AICp, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engi nee% ~'E BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Enq i~neer SUBJECT; OEL ET ION OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM N0. 20 Item No. 20 Consent Calendar, Approval to execute Agreement for the Acquisition of Off-Site Property between the Wa ttson Brno Company and the City, located at the northeast and northwest corners of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, has been removed from the Consent Calendar. The reason for the removal of this item is Lhe agreement has not been signed by the Wattson Arno Company. WJO:MO; sd Ul'1'Y UN' KANUriU UUUAMVNIiA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7. 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack I,am, AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra J. Adams. CMC, City Clerk Gl~~~`'1'`~~ SUB.lECT: CITY COUNCII. ITEM NO. Fl Please note that the incorrect Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is listed on the agenda index and in the staff report for Item No. Fl of the City Council Agenda. The correct number should read as follows: 1100-161.02 /dja ~C Lf`-'-~~ T ~;~,, CL. ,III IYI~~ {---.)~ b IJIUj1 roCT ~ -199"t he rm LEIS` i`~Ck Sc''_b~cG'~9t10~U~1'L~l1EItS141~~6 ~ ~ C• . ~ / ~ -~ ~i .„ , yc,1~ .ti-l r -i ~/ ~ eke. f~:.%~~-~C. r /~;;~', P` C~ ~ cam, -tom dd~c..a. w ~c ~~, L~.a , '~ ^~ 0. C~-~.'-c~-~JLf ~ y ~ ~ f ~ Y YY~CY~ -4A ai r~ / lm VAd~ h9 0. ~~ parr ak t .C~,t.~~~ ~.tn~a..,~C~ ,~.~_t-,ws., 3Shy:c.i'.L.vt- ~ r~.. bh,%"'Roe -7F~ .y ,~r ,,~ ~l!h~..~-.JLC 0.6.Ai I~ ~ SC~.at-@ ~cQ ll.~~w~ IU,i.I~" Ci- 'f'~i f7 G1..4~. ~S.* L ct tiw,h Qa.CCc.. ~C~<~ r. ~z- ~ '`~i~"~ ~~ Gt_cz 1. ~i ~t e,e-ln.. L•~l~.re ~xzo( .fhQ,t- /ru.`-r~.~'~c~ J~.Erc<d ter- ~n-E.ct~-~, aid ~:~ i i Cicc~.uc~ ci~ow+- ~ ~mcc,u'~ P Q~.t j,i<.~Y be. "Yr, rxdx . ~h~k {~ue~,hCt;,a( w.~, U,`-F,t.zl.~~.-re 1Q -JJ~,~.u ~z b~ J. -f~ o ;,~~,~,a ,~ ~~, c~h.~a~b~~ e l ct-,ate„ Tl~~ k~p~ s.> cud "' `~ -H.~~ .~ ~ a,•~~.~., - Ixti,i lx:-,~,~-~c~.~,~ -~e mow. ~p - ~`~`1 .tea,.. ~-t'~-,~.d.~j i. Gw. c.,i.,~(~ 6~.~.ti c~l 0.0-~~ . ~t tt: t {mot uric. Pc~S.4-~ ln.~_i_~ ~Q.CLu-~, Q.~,l.rn al%+ czt SUJrwn.e-CCUe ~a{ ~~ L.~ ~ ? }~C~ ~, ~-t, ~,ti'~ -~% ~c l~~ ~ -1k-- ~.,~~~ -~ ~. c,~.t `f-~ iru.x~ ;cu: ;~-e c~~ b~~~ '. ~- ~' i ~ ~ ~-. o"r ci-k~i,~i mot- :~,:- ~~ ~~~ -Tl~a,~~ y o~ , ~. (~.,1Cu~a.~-.~~co tu~,.e.~s /~ 73 ~ S'a-~~ a..~. ' ' ~- ~'ctc~~ Cl~ 9i73~ +F ~"~ -tom ~~-uc~. DATE: September 29. 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City C c11 FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: CONtMUPIICATION REGARDINO WISE OAH SCHOOL Pastor Hindley has made a written request to speak on the matter of Wlse Oak School under "Oral Communicatfona" for the next City Council meeting. Because of the sensitivity of this matter, and the fact that the school's CUP Application is sllA at the Planning Commission level, 1 have attached a copy of Planning's staff report that will be going to the Commission on October 14, 1992. The CUP issue is stlil before the Commission, and until they act, the Planning Commission has Jurisdiction over the matter. Therefore, the Council may discuss the matter, but cannot take any official action at this tlme. Brad Bulier wlll be available at and prior to the meeting to answer any questions you might have. JL/dJa cc: Rick Gomez. Community Development Director Brad Buller, City Planner Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 14, 1992 T0: Chairman and Members of the Pia nning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SVBJECT: MODIFICATION Tb CDNDITIONAL USE PEFM IT 91-17 - WILLOWS COIRdUNITY CHURCH - A new public hearing regarding a request to add a kindergarten through 8th grade school to a previously approved church and school located at 10601 Church Stteet - APN: 1077-421-31. ABSTRACT: At the applicant's request, the Planning Commission directed staff to re-advertise this item to allow opportunity for consideration of new information and public input. BACKGROUND: On August 26, 1992, the Plano i~.q Commission co rducted a public hearing to consider the request for a private R-H school. After closing the public Y.eazing, the Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial. On September 9, 1992, the Planning Commission, in response to the applicants' desire to discuss possible solutions to the concerns expressed by the Commission regarding the school use and operation, took no action regarding the Resolution of Denial. ANALYSIS_ The app li.cant has submitted two letters (see attached) in response to the three major issues discussed by the Planning Commission: 1) park usage, 2) access to the park, and 3) dropping off and picking up the children. 1. Uee of Spruce Park: The school desires to use tha park daily for its physical development program. The applicant proposes that no more than two classes at a time (46 students maximum) would use the park. The Planning Commission expressed concern that the applicant indicated their school use was dependent on the use of the public park. Further, the Commission was concerned t:~at open space was not available on-ai to within the PLANNING CO[MIISST ON STAFF REPORT CVP 91-17 - WIISlJWS COtS1UNITY CIR1RCIi October 14, 1992 Page 2 Terra Vista RUaine 99 Park to meet the school's needs. Spruce Park is a non-reserved neighborhood park intended for "drop- in" use by thr_ general public; however, the baseball field is reservable. .The school has applied for a reservation of the ball field from 1-3 p.m. Monday through Ftida}•. Currently, reservations are not granted for longer than six months at a time. The ball field is not available on Tuesday afternoons because of maintenance activiti ea. 2. Access to the Park: In response to Commission concerns regarding the safety of children walking to tF.e pazk, the applicant has offered to van shuttle all children to the park "until such time as the czossin g, under teacher supervision, is safer." Presently, r_hurch Street has no stop signs or painted cro aswalks at Elm Street (i.e., Terra Vista Gra enway Trail) or Terra Vista Parkway. A condition of approval could r_quire that the students be driven to and from the park- 3. Drop-Off and Pick-Up of Students: The Commission indicated that the Terra Vista Business Park was not designed tc accommodate the dropping-off and picking-up of students For a school. The applicant has supplied auamer school sign-in records indicating that arrival of the approximately two dozen children was spread-out over roughly a two-hour period, and the pattern repeated itself in the afternoon. However, the nu.,,ber of children could be Eive tiaea higher during the normal school year form September to June - up to 121 students are anticipated at full-enrollment (75 students are presently attending). To address this concern, the applicant offers two possible solutions: 7) painting a student loadlnq zone over the seven parking spaces directly in front of the entrance, or 2) utilizing the alley in the rear for student loading/unloading. The latter proposal is impractical because other tenants may have delivery trucks using this alle ywey. CORRESPONDENCE: Attached are copies of all correspondence received i.n support or, in opposition to, the proposed school use. This item has Seen advertised Sn the Inland Valley Dai 1y Rulle tin newspaper, the subject site has been posted, and notices were sect to all property owns rs within .300 Eeet of the subject property. RECOMM E_NDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to review and consl der the new information, and take puELic testimony. If after considering the new information and testimony the planning Conmission cannot support the squired findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial HOUld be PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS CO.MMUN ITY CHURCH October 16, 1992 Page 3 approoriate• However, if the Planning Commission can support the findings based upon the new information, then a Resolution of Approval has been provided. A.espe y sub ed, Brad City Tanner DB:DC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant dated September 4, 1992 Exhibit ^e" - Letter from Applicant dated August 29,1992 Exhibit ^C" - Public Correspondence Exhibit ^D" - Staff Report dated August 26, 1992 Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Minutes of August 26, 1992 Meeting Resolution of Denial Resolution of Approval ~VILLD~INS Community Church ~varcpelieal free CFiurckes o{Arrufica '2slS y$pM1VINy PL'{[,'E' al6rers: 10601 t:Ysrn:h Suite 300 Rpncha Crrcarronga, C~+jrmua 91730 P~^t~ f 71 i) ?898553 QLLCtOrS: jmttse 7!izr~([y Dave .M1lorgan SepromDera,ts92 ~ SEP 08192 Dear Mr. Buller 8 Planning Commbsion Members: 7~8~8~0~1~3~5~ ~ We nave dust nxeNeO coraes of your sYatt roport arW 3eptemt»r g Pian~ng Commisston agentla We naa hoped mat our commenb d suggested wouM De Considered prbr m tlro Commbslon MeeAn¢ in ma hopes of somencw resolving me apparem Impasse m an expedlem manner. Phase a[cept mb repuest to remove hom dte Consent CahMar b1 dlscuasion CorM!tlonal Use Pertnd 9t-17 - Wsbws COmmunAy Church. Specifkaly, we wbn ro ofM for dtscuasion me folbwmg .tams, Dy issue: USE OF SPRUCE PARK We have sled an applicaacn with me Cammuniy Services DeWmmem ro reserve me Ball DlamoM n Spruce Park MaMay-Fraay hom t pm - S l>m for sports actlvltlea. We uMersnnd roar a pMate fast-0aA Piro league has ateatly reeerretl me dlamorW hom 330. tlusk Mon-Fn., aM mat there seems ro Oe no appNem conlACt won city codas or prbr reeervatlon porky wrm regard ro ma scnoofs usage as a nonyrost organaanon. The Tema Vbb Business Park cunemry snares b me cost of maintenance ro Spruce Park No more than 2 cbssm at a tlms wouM ue~e me Oat dgmorkl, encompaashg a rDaktnum aeowabk a5 sbwem+. OI course, our own irboor gym wM be used for many repreatlonal acavisee. STUDENT CROSSND OF CHURCH STREETTO THE PAfiK: Certatiy we are al ho{artg mat cross walk9 8 srop signs wiA De positloned rot Churoh Street at Tens Vbta Pkwy an0 at Elm Street Many chidren already cmu at mess 2 interieceona from Tera Ybb Cammuniry ro me Theatres d Snopping Center, wMOUt supervebn. Therefore, we wid dine me children over ro me Park in cur vans until such tlms a4 me crossing, under reamer wpervislon, b safer. SAFETY OF STUDENTS, DROP-0FF 8 PICKUP. AX parems are reputed M slgn:n and sgribut mae cniklren hw sphobl, welch means no Seldom walks across me PanMlg bt without aoue super- vision. latt year, me planning commiasbn approved a resolrmon autltortimg 29 fxeschoerera and mein Parerib ro cross mat acme parkMg atop, which mey did as b tiro Stine momem. ! Ames on M-WF and a pmm on T-Th. They dkl mb welrout probMms because M parontal supervbbn d very little trafea Nommg nu cnanged, extepl (1) th croninge ors now ony twice a day, (2) me chidren are obey, and (3) more chlt7ren robl, but substantlasy fewer aver arty one psrrod (m me algn-iNON sheets testly) There ors no'pealc' mommg d atremaon dmp-olf tlmeal N mess new consi0era»ons do not assuage me Cammlesbn's sahry concema, we ofM 2 possNre raspbtlona afore problem: (1) Palen In a passenger badmq zone over iM 7 parbnq spies dhacmy m hoot of ma entrance (2) Have children dropped ott hom me baCing alley DehhM ms buibm¢ sidling in hom mere We share me Planning Comm W bn'a concern for me safety of mess stWenb, aM Daps mat our commenb 8 suggeatlorb wiA Help me goceas. The Tema Vista Business Park has trementlousy mzzed usages for me community, wNt me Church, me Cemral School Distrbt OrACee, 6 me Famiy Fimese Center as Mapr Tenanb, in atlditbn ro chlropracta, opremetrtrl, counseang center, and mama) arts training. 7ne approved Terra Vbb Park Plan Incbrdes I»'brons for a school The DuNt of cunent perking users are short term, when you consMer me aDOVe msmbnetl uses. Rarey have more man 8 bog-brm cars Dean parked In ms 87 ebb available cn our smp of parlong. d course. me Famiy F'itrleSa Comer use b heavy, shoA-term 6 constant on me Omer sqe o1 tiro Business Park We d0 not wish In any way ro present a Doetlk stance rowan our CNre Planners or Camm Wionen. Our pnorlry b ro serve our communty and resolve all concerns in a safe, canstmctlve, arM expedrent manner, so mess chidren m citizens In our Communlry can proceed with melt lawful educatlon. Slncerey, ~ r i ~~,T ~„ I~, _ . ~vvrLLa~s AUG 3~ ~71~Zmunitu Church -rxr CJ'RQM11r1'~C P1.AC~" aC6rus: [0601 Clwrc6 ,SNui~u 3/0_U 'r1`rl~Iw Cucamonga, California 91730 plronc: /7141 989 855 r pastors: 7mrtst 7fuuaey rjiorx A(organ p~1w(u(u(a~~~~elual `free Churches of America To Bad BUbr, Clry Planner: August 29,1992 Please accept my approcla8on for your carelul sNdy 8 endings concerning our CUP ModiACatbn to Include e non-prolk school, grades K-8M In our hdclllly; your recommendaXOn for approval was wen•reseamhed A your condlaons were wise. As you know, we sought ro resporM poaXhey ro every puolbhed cancem A corMlibn by your daparhnant. Needbss N say. we were shocked oy Me Planning Commbsbn's August 26 reversal of your studied recommeMatbn, cmng issues herelobre undbcbsed az real probems. Even wIM my haM raised. I was not showed M speak. Ohen an opponunXy. I beaeve we coub have, and SeX Can, resolve each of Me concarm M a sab erxl agreeabb manner. We wbn b work rogemer whh Me Planning Commbslon, yom Department, and any Oavemmenl InaXNlbn, and whh N sued Me denbl resolutbn caAed ronh la Me Sapt. 9 Plannkg Commissbn MeaMp. Time b crucial, ror Me conanued seMCe of Me xhool to Our community. They era ohenng Me ONLY K-8M grade private education In Rancho Cucamonga. I mpm undedine Mat Mb b a Wars-pro81 educational InstlNtlon whh great eMnk dherslry. 1 nave Ibled bebw the bazk Issues I heard expressed August 28M, whh responses and suggested solulbns. The 8rs1 corwem was Mat of park usage br pporb. Even Mougn we have a gym wtihM Me bull0ing, we were seeking Me usage of Spuce Park arourM me comer Nr Omer spats actlvmes. In my apphcation letter, I supgesletl'some supervbed recrealbn,' not Mdkahng how much or how mss. The Community Sankes Dept. had assured us Mey had no problems whh Mb. However, whhout aakmq lOr specdk days, Hmes, arM numbers. Me Plannng Commbbn envbbned hulbreds of kids absomMg me park moming 8 ahemoon. In sphe of Ina last mat omer pubAC xnoob have agreemenb ror park usage, arq every sNdenh lamity Days Iheh fuH share In taxes br pubR education (saving me stab heA a mlXbn dollaro yeady for 1 gg snMenb), and MIS Business Park pays CXy Fees Ivr mamtenance of publk areas.OUR usage of Me pubik park was seen as inhusNe. We have NOW secured a reserveson request br Me baX dlamorM' 01 SOruce Park hum t -3 pm Mon-Fri on whkh we Can play various Sports. Aheacly, anomer private organhatron has reserved Me dlamorq hom 3:304usk Mon-Fri, wlMOUt pmOkma. We woub have 2 classes al a Ilme br 1 hour. amounXng to no more Man 46 sNdenb at one fkne. N you know, State Law does rwt requee a Prhab School b nave an oubeor play area al eAl That b a parents pdvab deebbn. The second bsue was Mm o1 WALKING ro me Park, crossMg Church Sheet Tne sheet seemetl too busy tar shdenb b cross, even wXh aduX supervbbn. Does mb mean Mat PubAC School chhdren shoub not have to cross eheeb ro waPo b xhoa7 Hundreds of chibren elroa0y aosa Churoh Sheet Wally to hovel hom the Terse Vbte Community ro Me Theehes a SnoppMg Cenbr. However, ghen a chance ro respond, we woub have emphashe0 our own deep Corcem ror cMbron's eatery. we wW Merebre drive en ChAdren to Me park m Ins xhool vans untN crosskp condkbns are Oeame0 saror. Tne Mhd Issue was Mat of dropping oil and picking up Me chedren. The Commissbn envbroned 10g chlbren running from me can ro Me xnod, ap et one tkne... Md In sphe of our statement Met Me cmbren spread Meir arnval over 3 hours gxrore 8 aAer-xhool care b has), and Mat paenb must apn m Meh chlbron. I have encbsed representathe samples of Mese apn-M sheeb, snowing Ilmee and how spread out May are. Tne Planning Commbsbn APPROVED a Mommy 8 Me Preschool LAST year, where 20-some PreSchaobrs (age 1 72e) arse melr parenb were as mnnbg across Me parting tit AT THE SAME TIMEI Arlen aA, we're Dory Otxussbg 25 feet of a 2-shed panrMg strip won very IIXb ha11kl WE lease most the honMgel Drop-0HS M Me publk xhoob have much greater hafACl Again however, we suggest 2 poubNMes: (1)Palnt M a drive-Mrough drop-op covering Me 7 perkMg sptis b Mont Of Me Enhy Door, or (2)Have me parents drive Mrougn avd drop op Meh kbs Mom Me paved ship behln0 Me buadMg, and enter Mrougn me neck door. In boM cases Me sign-In meet would be bated at Me dropoa, ror easy movement of cars. 1 have encbsed a map. Please remember Mat hom Lewb Homes and we understood our prevbw C.U.P. b inthale Me School. Bul'dln9 A 3alery wlm Fire Inspecror Ron Nee rlghM altaretl our Arst oleos ro make aura we were bum ror E4 occupancy, wIM our C.U,P, ropresensnq more Man t2 hours per week of deasame. Unrodunatery, our eppikatron was not changed Mom E-3 b E-t by FivNOMg 6 gaiety. We tiro commhted to cooperaro wlm me GMy ro resolve arty lessee. J'r~ O~nh- ~~ CoWea la: Den Cabmen, Pon Nee, Mayor, CHy CouncX, Pbnnlnp Commbabn. Stale RePo. Churches, Deity BuAeen L~J!K~~~ ~', _~~ •T~~ ~p 3 W~ ~~ -.F, 0 H~ i r~ ~ N $F '~ 1 I ~_ ~~ ~ ~ - ~ > ~ ~ . li .r } d _ ' v '~ _ '~_ ! ~ 7 ~~ J ~ `^ _ ~~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ i. ~ ' ~ ~ t` ~ ~ , ~ r I I ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ' - i . c( -~ ~ '~~` ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ 1 ~ ~ } ~ : h ry n~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ t . ~ ' ; iR~ ~ ~ o n " ~ -~ n ~ ~ o .o ~ . n l ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ .; ~_ ~ O ,~ ~ ~ ~ G °' ~ ~ ,k t a 4 a ' ~ V ~ ~ 1 i y ~ l \ I } .~ ` n \^ 4 ~ v. .o r ¢ a .~ .a .-~ n n .1 .~ n .r .r n rv n rv n n rv '. .. .. ... ~' I V ~ .. , ~ 4 ~ ~ / ~ `~ i~ l ` Y ~ . ` w~ l r ~ l ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f h - ~ ~ f~ V - -- i J .d _ r t C '~. y ~ ~, ~ ~ yy l ~I ; r ! ~ e y `~ ~ '~ _ S N ; ~ 0 L . -< y . \ 9 ^ C ~ ~ ~ V ~ .~ c ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 F ~ ` 6 .~ _ ;~ ~ ~,m I a o O T yy M\~\ VJ 8` ai ~i 1 s H N o i01 ..~ a ~ '~ y ^ 3 I ~ 1 1 ~ ~ I r~ ~ 1 fi `~ Y A 1'1 fff ii1 , N ~ ~~ :' ` { " ~' PM ~ n "~ ~ , ~ ~ ' v ~' '{ S \ ~ u J ~ ~. ~ .. p D ~' I I ' W x ~ J ~` Y ~ ~ a V _ I .T ~L 4~ ~~ _ - i 1 Y ~ .`~,' 1 Y a y , ~ I "' y am ~ J l ii ' ~ . ~ l~ ,r . ~~ ~ ~\ ~ J \ Ft ~ f , . ~ , n ~ \ r ~ a `, G c ~ ~ ` f I n J J W I ` , ^ C S 3 ~t 5 '~ ~ ~ t0 _ ; w u Z ~ w r ~ O ~. ~ w Z ~ ` I, z 3 ~ 1 .., r z 'Z p M F v~ OY d~ Fg J ~ 1 ~ , \ J ~ y ' ! 1 1 , \ R i ` ~a 1` \ ~ 1 a_ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ \ y / '~ I z r ¢ F b _ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 1 9 l6 ~ ~ V~. N tf o If . ~ . W y 6 ~. Y W ~ ~ ~ y 2 ~R u I ~ a ., } ~ ~ 1. i'; T T-- 1 .r- U ~ .t... ^) r i / .L ~ .. ~' ~= ~ re ,, ., \ ~., i• =_ ~c ~~ , ds ~ o. ~,. ~ Y \ ~ 7~ ~~ .. .~ VI /. ~wr ~'~ ~~ .... ~ _- _ '.~4 ,._ __ -F--' -- i a ~ f SAD ±,' < `; HA 1 ^..~ ~~ k ~ ~ -..~~ ~Ar~, / i~ v.. / Plf. ', ., ^ ,,,V SyE~ryP~~1 ~? 1992 September 4,1992 ~i9~°1Wir'I+w1u~gC Chairttan and Members of the Planning Conrussion City' of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Ncamonga,Ca.91730 Deaz Members, I am writing this letter which is of great i~ortance and on a very personal subject; the denial of obtaining a licenssl school pernut for Wise Oak School.Wer fourteen years Wise Oak School has never been unjust towards it's conmmi[y or with it's families.Studenta who attend the school past and present could attest to this.Wise CUk School has always had a family atmosphere and with the citys' assumption of the safety of the children placed in danger is outrageous.lhe number one concern of the staff has always been the children.I have only Veen workinrl at Wise Oak School for one year,but yet I see the lo~z and the care betwc~ teacher and student. I truly believe that Wise Qvk School can work with the Planning Commission to resolve this tert¢~orary problem. incerly, ~/~~~/~~ Danny Physical ucation Instrvctor ~~~~T G,. Clay OF RANGNO COCAMONW ' M.ANNINO OiVISION ~ SEP 0 8192 ~ 7~9~i~!l~1~6 ~, C°a,.4o.24~-0 ./~.p. ~ ~n.o-u.-,.. //~d+ ~~ 1, ..~.......C~. /~R~~ eve;-a.E, ~.a~~: ~.~L `~~...~ ~~-.-.~~- ~- ~. a., ~,~.~7~.~cq,~i~/ c`.ti'aL `/~o/~. r~a~,}=~~,ao.,~ ~J ~.}CJ ~'~: ~~~ia r~~ rLP } OC.CCUC.l~.4: GL /~Ix.2• -C•l-JLf~Lt. ~1~L .d[r~-.u~l+/-rV LLf. ~,_, ~..a~ r,u~e..~~a~ .al,a, _c..~-n+e~~ ~,ia-c a. A-~...c......%<. ~.i~.e...2y~.e-t~ ~u.~ "a.cr~~ Ycac~`~~^^e.~., n '/ ~-u.~ct¢~.i1.~_t., evtw -.r~irv ~ta.~cd~ e[-..e1i ~u~e~+.~i.~t~ 'fie- c.~.~ C ~ .j- .L,~..1:~ ~.. ~eMw~.~ Cep-~u"frl(.!/• 9 / ~~// Qp // ~ ,c ~.~: cc.lS.: ~h.L C t-Y ~..~-~,> ~ ~!t(.1/ ~dCd:~ cnl~. ~r ~ -~ ,~.. 71:~. ~ rig,,,, ~!L<G,-VL.~ :`'_..ti~.= Y Ct<,c.~., ~.~ 9T7~~ 0 tiu~5v~' ~ ~~2~ s=s ;,. USA 19 GHQ ~ ~~-~-~ J C~•C2c. ~~ /~ 2,. ~~A ~0 ~ tea.--E ~o,.~ ~!o,, ~.Ee~t~.;~ -~,;.r~ ' Gu~.~ cPa.e, ~~,~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ w~ ~ . h~. ,aty ,..~..t Z ~vad ~csct`t ~. LUG a.(tcr4d ~~.~ f,(~ ~p~.Coa-Q mss-cc.f. a~ ...Le- Gr-i ¢.C~l"o[t~- K-./w~ c71,caGt'cre ~.+E' a-t ae .vt..CeL.-~ urgc4'oC,/~- ¢G.E'.a~.~a ~o ~,2-S~ uJ+-.E.Cct 7t~' ~ r/ ~~~`..,' GL" 2t~seG.~~ a iS y,..-.-u~- ~r.«c.9 u,~-c-c.~ ~Le ~bu..~..._~c J /,c~;~w ~uv ~v. ~ •~~s f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 1992 TO: Chairman and Hembers of the Planning Commiaeicnlnl~ FROM: Gail Sanchez, Planning Commiaelon Secretary // S VHSECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PEPNIT 91-17 - WILLOWS COMNVNITY CHVACN Resident Lisa Barnes telephoned today to ezpreee support for the Planning Commies ion's denial of the modification to Conditional Uae Pecm it 91-17. She stated she ie ehs Eoster mother of one of the Wiee Oak students. She asked that I torwartl her comments [o the Planning Commission. Ma. Barnae expressed oppoelt ion to the school although she supports church use of the property. She noted the school end church era not connected, but are only sharing the butldinq. She objected to the school because she felt it would mean the introduction of alcohol and an increase in crlaa problems. She tlid not think the facility i• lerge enough end felt there will be an accident with the increased traffic in the parking lot. She mentioned that there have already been several accident• with only the church services. Me. Barnae felt there are other locations in the corcmunity which would ba better. She also stated Ghat the eleawntaiy school Dy iha Terra Vista apartment[ is being enlarged and she thought a new high school and junior high school will be located in the area. She felt that there will be too much congestion from the cehar •choola, which would be made worse by the addition of Wiae Oak School. She also thought the school should act be lccatetl in a shopping or industrial center. /ge UTY OF F~NCMO CUCAMONOA PIAHNING OIVI5i0N ~ SEP 0 81992 ~ '1~1r?~~~i~ 1 September ?, 1'352 ro "hairman and Members of Lhe Planning Commission: T would like to thank the Chairman and all the Members of the Planning Commissicn far taking the time to read this letter. I would like to mention some positive aspects o£ sending my son to Wise Oak 'school located on Church Street in Rancho Cucamonga. Havin6 my son in a positive educational atmosphere with an impeccable safe environment is a peace of mind- The staff at Wise Oak School is highly qualified in every aspect. This makes a Doaitive dif£erenca in my son's attitude towards furthering his education. Lastly, I would like to comment about the Director. Ma. Forney. She has eo le ly committed her li£e to running a successful school. Moat noteworthy ie her previous record being responsible for the safety and well-being o£ the students for feurtoen years without any serious mishaps. Therefore, we ae parents are looking forward to the inception of Wiae Oak School at its new location. T~nhL(a~n_k/y(~y~oJU,Q~~O~ ~ ~/ O- `' Dyan Singer (Parent) S i y")~0 4 ~~-LR '.TemIOGk 5~. ~ PM ~_ _ /?92 q I -~ 30 ~~ ~~ 1 ~~ ~ .~^'ti1 ~~ ~ x~w vYY~LtN~ C~c~ ~l2an.~)e)15 p~ P~altin.l~v~~ C,.6`TY~/)LLtl~,o4-CO~nI. C C'I-lA. d.~l, ~Q..~1.~t.J' I D `mil ~ CLEI \ C oC15o0 VG-+xc~ e-e-~,ti iS~. ~anr~o C~,(_~~rn~~~ e~- ~v. , :.ir~e,t. a , I q9 a AES SEP B 8-1992 N~ n~s~w~1~~s,~~~F . c~,~r~o,~-, aid. -rra o~ ~. PJ~„ c~ ~"`ca.~, Cn+-c~ri~s ~Q- ~ o s ~ Cti~. CQ,Y.-lsn. D.,.u.~, _. ~.iar*~Ca~ ~a,~.~p~q~o,,, ~ CA.. 9 i l 30 _ j ~YA~'~ -YY~gn,ti)~,1p Iv ~zrn,3e~. ~5_ jw JLK~r~ppi~ uyy~ urn - - ~A v_ I~ chin-.~ 9.~-:n~. ~anu....~__C~.c_.~w~, ~~Sb_ Q.o ~u._ .~catc~, A• ~"~-'~,~.,~ ~- ~~~. a ~~ -.- ~I"1 J-~1/Y1~~1]NwT~,~. ~yy.y,,,.. ``bv~ronmtl ~ y 1 N1'~ ~6JV~Q. ~ ~ 9t~.0.~[Yl. ~i+90 ~ ~SY~ ~.lYl"il.. o,ac~.~'0~. 1..~cu. ~:}~..~w,._c.$uA~r.vey~ .fit„~ ~,o aw. ~~a,~s,._ ~ a _~~wa~~ .,u,i9SU.r~c~. jGe lwo~. Ji,nirl. .~~..`. ~~,~ . °~.<~. °aaa . September 2, 1992 The Ronorable Larry McNiel City of Rancho Cucamonga SAP 0.;1990 P. O. Hox 807 , Rancho Cucamonya, CA 91729 '~~9il0illi12~li2~gsg~5 Dear Commissioner McNiel, This letter is to inform you of my dismay regarding the Wiee Oak School confrontation with the Planning Commission last week. I believe that policies of the city should enforced, but fairly and equally. As a business owner who lives and works in the city, I am unfortunately reminded of the state-wide reputation that Rancho Cucamonga has: the most difficult, unreasonable group to work with. Codes and Zoning laws are important standards that should be made clear to the applicants and enforced by the Planning Department, Commission, and City Council. In this case, and frequently with others, I believe a reasonable process has not be implemented- Therefore, I urge you to attend to this matter so that the Wise Oak School can legitimately continue their service to the community. Sincerely, Caro y J. Pre s~n 9616 Lemon Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 seP o ~ ~s9< ~8i9~lAilla2i1~~3~5F .~ ~~'7li~~z~m.c q-v~~~~/~~i/~~~62v~ of /~~Ghnin C~mmissio,.l C17~Y' D~ if',971/ ~-a°la ~-G/C'~9y+~ o n y ~- su~~of-~- o ~ GJise D.p-~ Sc-~i c o l a.~%- /060 / C h use c h S t~ e ~- S4 , ,~ v / ~ /sz /7~'C~/6 G1GlC~Uv,~c a.. 0~,. cPccu~y/~ f~-~.~ ~/1 a cQ.e s ~1-~,~ ~r~"-12 Sept 9. She ~~ lC,i'J ~ W ~ uJ~Pit-4~ .gip ~ r+-t ,p~7 P ya4 cX. ~~~. . ~C~-j/~ ~'7CL4 a.,~enraA.~Q /~.i~llct~a. C~'ioo I s s 1 r~ eA '(•'~.~-tL 0.q °~ VV~`` .S o dY~v `f'Pti2 --~t~~~-- S ~ rJ~v- " W.2 3taaJu.. E'/1'~Ok(y/ ~ ~-21/2K~C2. iC.'2Coq v~ 1'Z.~ w- pI.C~ ~ rt- i~ ct~~ a~ ~!c c_~r.-'Q-~Qs-,.. ~U ~~~.~1 ~- l.U Q, (Y.2S 14424 ~~ Orlq W 1~~-./. ~~ "~ C G~, fLd1 I`l ` S C-l. ~(a0 ~Cr(1 V'~ PYl ~/I Q.~ /l rrt v~s'le C-V vLll~C~_1~1Z Vl_ a-<c.'~I v C~.~C V e. 10 A,S GL W R~.Q /(v i.(n i) e-t~ t vi d1 t V t 6L k aX , ~Q~Jo~ w-si 5-E-~ ~~~ ~A. tteu~ ,.Q,o C~-~t-~a-~ ~ ,F s c~Uo I 6 ve-r., ^~ e~~nti a~. G nJt -~~ 1'11-<.~~,~ GUS C~ rQ -e f~~~~~ s «rQi r ~i~P w ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ a-~~~t-moo ~o~ 7~-e- a~~oe~f~ c~ o ~,~ ~e ~o ~ ~~~ ~~~ P~!/i.~oir~~,~ era-taL ~cvr~n,~o u~/ ~i ~iis, G~u-~ su~6oz~ =~o c-u~~a-cam- ~ ~ SSG! i,t ~ ~~, . ~ ~c.~` ~ Q~i~o a.-t G-~~ ~ O l/ ~G~. ~~~~.. 77c-e- ~c~,~i s i tac.a.f f n2, a_-~- y-h i~- C-c.e m ~ ~-~~ ~ c~r~c~ S ~~Ld-T•v~~ . ~,e- ~ c2 ~~~.,~ ~ e.r c-ma`- outer, ~ ~-o Cry-cQit~-.1_. y~c.e s C-cit~ S JlliCQ Grp ~2E'IZ-cQ `~o ~~-~~ --~X C'~.C~-.t ~' s ~o i Q ~D ~ s 7LU// /~. W S ~` Lt. C-u'`-r~ Vc~~ l I Z -2 cL v~ rJ ~ O J~.fa'_E 9 `t"ft~. .~~2~'7a" `~f2CC,7'e- e ce.2~ ~.-~-~- a ~ c.~ ~~e,-~ ~~ Q Cam- Ci n ~ ,~t2 ,~ Lc> i n ~~ _e~,.~'~. GCiG! w~ a- w o ,-~ r.~ . ~-, ~ ~ cc~ it o cc c~, -l- 0 1 ~ ~ 2 ~-o ,~ Gti ,mot cam-, 'f~i is Go~.~' _ ~" G~rc-CQ~-~' ~GL~QrCs'lirllc C.©mmrssidw~~ Scc- ,-, crh ~ z ~-u ~-,-, ~ 1 y cr Y`t~L o -~- W/ s e 6 ~- !~' who w ~..._~- `f~l i s s CG10 o r -~ ~_-E'.~-e- ~~ is L 0 Cc ~n Or-n ~ who ~ o.,ti#- ~--.h rs 5 0 o I ~ mc~.- 0. c~. ~ Ff -p-~. e~,.T~ -, (~! SA Q ~- !~ i S~~ o o\ ~ S Yl ~2.2.A S. vn a ~ ~/ w i rl n ..¢M~ c~~.~ v~p LLV Co w~..vh ~ S S i o~_ ~ S 6 v~1Z 0..Q-oo ~S~1c~ ~.R~'~ ~~ 1 SA. ~~4 K ^^Qnn ~l n /1.L-lR. ~ 1 ~ 'F ~ (,Cp-+<~c..-ems vv~ ct_ vt v~~ ~I--G~.c~- v~.ee ~.2. S 1 v~ C.¢~-~.~ ~ . O i. .~ lrr~ve .~k ~ I ~ ~. ,~ ,` ., r rlA. r,'. .,~ J SEP 011991 ~Si9~iwl~ili~S~Kr ; a August 30, 1992 Chairman ar~d Members of the Fl arming Commission City of Honcho Cucamonga lO5tJ0 Civic Center Drive Fancho Cucamonga, CA 917..?O Dear Members: I write this letter in regard to your decline in issuing Wise Ca4; School a licensed school permit. I understand your concern far the safety of our students, but please be aware that we care for our pupils as if they were our own children. We would never do things that would put a child's safety in danger. I have been a teacher at Wise Oak School far four years, and during that time we have never had any serious accidents. We as teachers take many precautions to insure that our students have a safe, healthy, and educational surrounding. hope that we ran work together and resolve this matter. We are looking forward to a great start at our beautiful long awaited new 4acili ty. I look forward to your support. Rye~sp ec tf ul ly, //L}.C~. ~~1c 2 F-a. ~~ Mrs. Adriana Perez k.:i nd ergarten Teacher Wise Oak School (714> 987-9918 SEP 0.1`.2 a~ 3D~ / JQ~ di9il0iili12i1i2~3i4~5 :. ,,Q.~,~-~ ~~ i1~~ ~ ~.-'rte" ~~ ~ ~. ~- w~~i~,-c~ y~/u o mac. ~.~C~u..~cr ~ ~cv~~ `~~ w.¢,tZ u..,e. ou:~c_ ,=7iKeY~" tvG woccLtL hceYz~ ~-c°P~r~r.'~~o e ~l~eu, -eyl,~ . ~ ~v...e. -~zC..~ .7,¢ _ /! ~a.a.Lv_2 ~~'~L~tu/ ~y~Q~~ Ly~L /air~2 c~.+~c,cc.ouo~ ~'r'' i(.o ~co~ a.u2- ~ccui' ..,fcc ~u.,cl "~(':LN,~ ~~~ ~~ ~~_ ~~~ ;~ ~~ seP ~ ~y~_ ~'9d013111211t23~4i` ~/.Gaz c-?iLC~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ .~. ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ a a,-~~ Gazes-~w* tL..~ ~.,-~ y%a`a~.e -~--~-- ~-~.~.e- ~-e c~..~ ~. ~~ 2 ~~- ~~~ ,moo dam-~-o.ti/~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~- J-d.e , G~.,e ~~ ~~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~e ~-~ . {~~- ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ 3 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~ _ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~, ~~_ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ .~ ~~~ ,~ S~ .,-~ ~-o ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~~~ ~~- ~ s ~~ ---s ~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 26, 1992 _ -- T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cownission F ROH: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Uan Coleman, Principal Pla ~~er SUBJECT: MODI FICATIIXV TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91- fl - WILUJWS COtM1UNITY CHURCH - A ze quest to add a kindergarten through 8th grade school to a previously approved church and school located at 10601 Church Street - APN: 1077-421^31. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Churches and private schools require a Conditional Use Permit under the Terra Vista Community plan. BACKGROUND: Through a routine code enforcement inveati gation the week of July 20th, ii was determined that the Wise Oak School is subleaainq the church's space for their private school. There are approximately 80 children attending Kindergarten through Eth grade classes between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., with a limited amount of child care before and after school. The maximum enrollment anticipated is 121. The Wise Oak School relocated on July 13th from their former location on 19th Street. Staff informed the church and wise Oak School Chat the K-R school use was not approved under CUP 91-17 and that an application to modify the CVP was necessary. However, it is the church's position that they were approved for stch a use. The on ginal CUP application submitted by Willows Community Church requested a "church, with public assembly on weekends and/or weeknights". Ir, addition, the applicant also requested approval for ChaE£ey Adu 1t School's "Mommy 6 Me" classes, Monday through Friday between 9 a. m• and 2:30 p.m., and ARISE Academy of the Arts extension classes, Monday through Friday from 3:00 F•m. to 5:00 p.m• There is no mention of any private K-B school in the application, accompa nyiny letter and plane describing the facility, Initial Study Part I, or the. public hearing testimony (sae Exhibits "E")• T'ne tenant improvement plans were approved with an A-3 fassea~bly) and E-3 occupancy. The State Uniform Building Code define9 E-3 occupancy as for day-care purposes (see Exhibit "F") which would be eonaistent wrth Lhe Sunday school and "Mommy 6 Me" ciaseea. The Wise Oak School requir. es an E-1 occupancy under the UniForm Huilding Code. The Building and Safety Division sad Fire Safety Division are working with the appl cant to resolve this issue. PLId"TIING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-17 - WILIUW5 COMMUNITY CHURCH August 26, 1992 Page 2 Tt is staff's opinion that the K-6 private school was not approved in conjunction with CVP 91-17, Dosed upon a careful review of the church's CVP request, the written and oral staff reports, together with the public, hearing testimony. Likewise, the Resolution of Approval 91-79 (see Exhibit "G"), adopted by the Planniny Commission, contains no desorption of a K-S private school; however, it does describe the hours of operation for the church services and "MO,mny 6 Me" and art classes. ANA LYSi S: The primary issues associated with this request are as follows: Compatibility with surrounding uses: The applicant is requesting approval for a Kindergarten through eth grade private school; however, is discontinuing the Chef fey Adult School's Moamiy b Me" classes. the school operation is described in the atteched letter (see Exhibit "J"). Although the proposed private school has significantly more students, the use is similar to the "MO~y b Me" classes and ARISE Academy arts clasae6 in terms of hours of operation, noise levels, etc. The school would be operating during the peak business hours of the other tenants. All school activity is conducted indoors, except for orcesional tripe to nearby Spruce Avenue Park. Staff foresees no compatibility problems between the private school and other tenants. 2. Parking: The Development Code requires two parking spaces for each elementary or jurlor high classroom. The new floorplan (see Exhibit "I") indicates four clasaroome for Wise Oak School which reouires eight parking spaces. A private school will have a morning and evening peak demand as patents drop-off or pick-up their children, probably over a 20 to 30 minute period. School policy requires parents to si 9n-in their child which lengthens the turnover rate for parking spaces. At pre Bent, the ARISE classes axe limited to a theater troop; however, classes in other performing and visual arts may be offered in the future. Depending on the nature of these classes, students may be dropped off by the parent or the parent :nay stay with the child or themselves be a student. The existing conditions of approval limit any cla sees to the maximum allowed by the oval labia parking far Lire church. A total of 32 parking spaces are allotted to the church within the Terra Vista Business Park. Staff believes that adequate parking exists for the church and the proposed K-e private school. ' - PLANNING COMMYSBION STAFF REPORT • CUP 91-17 - WYLIgWS CO'„AIUNITY CHURCH August 26, 1992 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staf£ recommends that the Plahning Commission approve the modification Co CJP 91-17 to include a E-8 private school through adopt' f the tacked Resolution. /Brad 8 le City fanner BH: DC:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Original Uniform Application Exhibit "H" - Original Applicant's LetteY Exhibit "C" - Original Ini tlal Study, Past I Exhibit "D^ - June 26, 1991 Staff Report Exhibit "E" - Minutes of June 26, 1991 Exhibit "P" - Uniform Building Code - croup E Occupancy Exhibit "~" - fteeolution of Approval 91-79 Exhibit "H" - New Application Exhibit "I" - New Floorplan Exhibit "'J" - New Letter Describing Uae Resolution of Approval z ~_ _~ ~_ /n V _Z Z Z a J 0. ~- W J W W O } ~."' Z c~ L O U~ LL H Z W Q W City of Rancho Cucamonga GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED PBO~EC- REVIEW REQUESTED PA RT I '- Uniform Application I ^ CON DiTIO NAL USE PERMIT' C TECHNICAVDESIGN REVIEW - ~~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL' NON CONSTRUCTION' ^TECHNICAVDESIGN REVIEW - I ^ DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT RESIDENTIAL' (ZONE CHANGE) ^ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT G GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT O BASIC STANDARDS ^ OPTIONAL STANDARDS C MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C CUSTOM LGT/SUBDIVISION MINOP. EXCEPTION C DESIGN REVIEW (REAPPLICATION) C PRELIMINARY REVI E'W ^ VARIANCE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT C ~ ^ ~^ ^ .u i.......~•....,. ... ...,~,a.~. o.w i a u ..~ u. u~u...~ e~_u~•.r_.. DESCRIPTION su/rEJ //~~~/2z fh'voLv SO~ARL Fe'fT ) /~~/~ CNVR CN ^"./~`/>f°R /FJ- 6vJR fNlP A^ia JvivoAL ..;CNUVr Off! ,^r t _S/h'pA Y~+ C NAF/'f/ /'I C~CY ~-~(_NUUCJ ;t IOMmY F/~l[ C6NJ.J ~~''U'O°~', FRrD AY FRaS.r 9- z .'3Ot g,~n /-IR/JC ~c goc,.+~ or ~N! A-y1 CcAr;fB 19aN/iq`-FR/DA .` ~R 0-vr } -.(-• SpML OiHGQ ~F7l.c'-o•+~NCS; .~.,R "~.,~,.,_ 1_ ~ c Vii.'/T/! J_ ~ j c---TiFI~ATRiN ~._.._ ~..~_._._ I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FUATH ER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE I ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE ANO ACCURATE. AGENT OF OWNE~I MUST ATTACH A LETTER OF 'AUTHORIZATION FRGM THE LEGAL OWNER. = .I ~~ DATE, =.1-- SIGNATURE ~ .~„ x- J ~ Ld Ear'.~^ --- ~ ~ '' PRINT NAMES TITLE: ~.e.di+ Mr7~Nnnk~~ 1~ p1^L~'~N =? I D, /c ivEO Br =q^,• FEES gE~`uFE~ ~ ~. ..'/GC?:v~S ~?r~MG, NirY Cn IRCN-/'A+roa F^+~REIT~7//r/O~EY ~rP v-f ~'~.~ ACCPES$ fYEf~FCN/cq~o '?moo .`Q9NC/voC-ycq..~o.vGq 9/?tea JWNERS Nn ME ~ TElEiyONE I~~E~rca.~ ~~•~ ~12,r,ticvz 4u67S57 >9C FE55 I r„x I~r/u Uv>~. N-r.~,) !P dr7ZL _ - City of Rancho Cucamonga Y~ PART II UNIFORM APPLICATION NONRESIDENTIAL PROJECT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT TABLE ~~ Project Name - - "" °'~ ^' °^' V " ~ ~' ~~ Reference Fila No.: ~ ~ "' k rt (Staff LocaNOn -.. _n ~ ~° '~-' /N ` '"~ Use Only) II General Plan I~~ Development District j PROJECT AREA ~ Grass incl. area to centerline of abutting streets): acres: ii Net ;excl„vve of dedicaoor. for major external and secondary streetsl: acres; AREA 615TRIBUTION (B~Nd on NN anp ACRESISO. FT. °h OF NET AREA Building Coverage Lantlscape Coverage Vehicular Area (incl. parking): FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPOSE USE(Ba~W on HN Anil Area of Builtling Pad No. of Stories Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) ProposeA Us i y (` C r•~a u. l) b, r C r: a n~ S r ' II I PARKING Type of Use Parking Ratio M of Spaces Required I ~ of Spaces Provitle I I'~fc vc '1 ^fna~s J 7 'f 58aa1~w~a~r (, ~'nN .r. n. an/J Total No. of Parking Spaces Required: S y N Su N~++~"t 3 j ' S f' * as °„y.,~ wc.~n rr LFn, . Total No. of Parking Spaces Provided: ^ (5 us w~sr f.p,uas No. of Compact Spaces of Compact Space to Total Space : ~~~ / ///III j~ N ~LVI r ~ O~VS Community Church ~varegefica! ~"ree Ckurckes of 9lmerica °Y7fE GRD't~'~%`(s PL2CE' ¢6Trcr: 8968.7rcli6afQ Suitt 3119 RPncba Cucamonga, C¢G,ornia 91730 ph¢nc: ;7141 9898553 patters: jornst xnR'cy D¢vt Morgan Mark,§mnt Concemirg our proposed rebcatbn info SuNes 1 i8-122 at the Tema Vista Bu5ine55 Park, boated at 10607 Church Avenue, we intend to utilize d,e facllNles as a church, with p~blb assembly on weekends and/or weeknights, outside o1 nonna! bu5ineu operathp tours in the IacilNy. The largest number of people we coub reasonably seat in our sancdrary woub be 280 in t ,960 sq N o1 seatirq space, requidrg 58 parking spaces oN business hours. It is possible we coub have some daytime BrDle Studlea and meetings. AddebnaAy, we will maimain a church oNice in the facility dudrg nomurl business houre. At the presets time, we have two pastors usirq oNices, and will be addlrq a secretary/ receptbnbt. We aMbgate mMlnuing to provide faceNies for the ChaNee Adult School'a'MOrmry 8 Me' Classes, maetlrq Monday -Friday between the hours of 9 am and 2~O pm Ad6tbnaNy, wa will Da workirtp with ARISE Academy of the Arts, based in North POnana under the dkegbn 01 Marlene Craig, to oiler extensbn classes Monday through Frday Irom 3:00 Prn a 3:00 pm These will not need more than the 32 spades elbtled to us for rafR181 business hours, We are rtavkq from our preSeM bcatbn In the Wllbws prWesebnal Center, on Archibald south of 8th Street, In order to occupy a laryer facNNy wNh mare opportunpy for slgrlifiCaM ministry in the community. Cunentty, there q m church at me center of the city (FOO1Nll 6 Haven), and slgnNicaMty, cane in the Tena Vista command a the weatem Vktode Proles. We see ourselves worklrg arm In arm wNh tt>e boat 6CltadS, tflB YMCA, and the CXy b provide wholesome famiy agivNles and nurture. A special concern we have is for single parents. Our sign,'Wilbws Community Church' will be displayed on the Mrildlrq in accontarice with the Terra Vista Sign Code. Thank you !or your consideretbn. Since ely, Forrest HIndI~ Pastor CUr~ 91--~- ~-~C~11k3~ i t ~t ~ SUBJECT:CUP ENVIRONM,~NTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I GENERAL for all oroj ects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinati ono: (1) The project wi it have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will he prepared, mr (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: !l1 pr / , / `j Y/ Project Title: ~/cco.~l Co ~, n-, vnn :-r C!•/dRffj Applicant's Name, Address, Ta lephone: 6v /~c o.~s (v „M V.v,rr CNV,e~H OqJ r„t f',,,zr_r,rf/~~vo~r~. o'PSdA.«r-~rG~l~o aaoo_R,gti~N. (~c~. 9/»0 ~7~r_/v6?.~r1,3 Name, Address, Te leDhone of Person To 8e Contacted Concerning this Project: /Jq J-roe f^,aR EJ'r h'r ^~9c £r -rg ^-~C ,4an-eFr~ location of Project: l aRRa U1 ~a ~~~~ r~rcnnrs /~g.e ~, 0~~~ ~r,,.~ /~ S~'~[1 //d'-(22 /060/ (~~ ~rZCH '1v ~/Zq NCyo Cti cq ,., ~NLA Assessor's Parcel List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency isSU ing such permits: ,~I[?;c~ ~L PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed protect: C., oe rw ill/rou -,¢ru -rG',a//awxC~A;rGr -.~. ~e h~onrl; CN/~a(: ¢~An. ar ~r .. •a~4 `,t /, „.... r-Cl¢"eenrf er ~'ry-F Q-3j /l;,.t /-~C.~of~+Y oa Q~-TJ .~1 -f ?-s. S^M£ orvlR A~ryL,(r r~r ^'~i {'/~ L /Jis~S; r <!ndct RNO .fATV ~'-OA YI . Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Flc~ c~•co/n.cs A<~ E.r(r rr.vG, J V(Y Z/S //Q-/2Z ~NCON QASJ Gam, S'I J {iJ %4; N/NL JQ V//4 /Z' /'t(T, Describe the en vironm~ental~sett~in of the protect site including information nn topography, Soil stab- - i itl' y, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): ___ _ Is the protect part of a larger protect, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact ,moo ~-~rlfl~'t N~„ r, ,r MILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in greu nd contours? i~ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? ;/ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for munic ipai services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? ~~ 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ L,, 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ / 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f lammables or explosives? v Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily:_ M ;,,,~ R 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this pro,j ect: _.~ ini ~,n q ~ 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: No,~ 10. If the project involves the construction of residential unfts, co~lete the form on the next page. OENTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and fn the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the hest of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that add itlonal information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Divisfon. Date: 5 i 'r Signature ~`~r~,-.~ d"'% Title ~°`y~z ~xyrerr c" CITY OF RANCHO CliCA_v1UNGA STAFF REPORT `. r~ DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Hrad Huller, City Planner HY: Jerry Guazracino, Assistant Planner HCHQ ECT: ENVIAONMSNTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL VSE PBAM IT 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH. PASTOR FOAREHT HINDi.BY - The request to establish a char<h and school in a leased space of 8,429 square Peet within an existing office park on 12.59 acres of land Sn the Office Professional zone, located at 10601 Church Street - APN: 1077-421-31. StafF recoamenda Sasuance of a Negative Declaration. PR[,JECT AND SITE DBSCRIPT IONv A. Action Requested: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Uae Permit to eetabliah a Church/School facility within an existing multi-tenant Business Park at 10601 Church Street. A. Surrounding Land Uee and Zoning: North - Ever green Apartmen tel Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) South - Terra Vista Torm Centers Community Co~erclal East - Vacant; Nigh Aeaidential (24-30 dwe111ttg unite per acre) bleat - Vacant; Of fits Park C- General Plan Deeignationes Project Slte - Offlee North - High Rea idential (24-JO dwelling unite per acre) South - Co®ualty Co®ercinl Eest - Office West - Otf ice D. Site Charactezlatics: The site is developed wish a multi- tenant Busineae Park. mhe site provides tranai tion oP density between the Coa®unity Comtaercial zone to the south and the Multi-Family district to the north. Existing tenants Snclude, Family Fitneae Health Club, Central School Diatzict offices, State Farm Insurance, and Madole and Aaeociates Engineers. E. Parking Ca lculaticna: Sea Exhibit "F". N PLANNING COMM IS SIO GAFF RE PJRT CUP 91-17 -WILLOWS l'ONPIUNITY CHURCH June 26, 1991 2aye 2 iI. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Willows Community Church is proposing to move from their present location in the willows Professional Center on Archibald Avenue south of Bth street to the Terra Vista Business Park. The center is a multi-tenant industrial puk containing approximately 95,000 square feet in four single-story bui ldinga. The Church intends to occupy 8,629 square Eeet. Proposed improvements include a 1,900 float sanctuary with approximately 240 seats for weekend and evening worship and a variety of associated office and classroom space. The classrooms will host a variety of activities including Mommy 6 Me classes. The church is also affiliated with the ARISE Academy of the Arta, Daeed in Yomona, which will sponsor claesee in the preforming and visual arts. At this time, the applicant is proposing to hold services and other assembly activities on weekends an8 on weeknights. Proposed daytime activities Snciude Mommy i Me claesee Monday through Friday from 9:00 a. m. to 2:30 p.m. and art claesee from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Issues: The primary issues associated with locating thin type of use within an Industrial setting are compatibility with surrounding businesses and parking aveilab111ty. Compatibility with surrounding uses: There are a variety of uses allowed within the Office Park desi gnaticn; they include: pro fesaionnl of tices, some retail and service buaineasea, commercial recreation faci Litiea compatible with office use, Financial ineti tutions, eating and drinking eatabliehmente, and community Eac111tiee (such ae chuzcheal, to name a Few. The majority o1 these bueineeaea operate during regular business hours from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. A notable exception in this center would be the Pamily Fitness Health Club which operates during normal business hours, ae wall as evenings and weekends. The proposed hours of operation for church activltle9 will take place during off-peak hours in the evenings and on weekend days. The City has many churches oper sting in industrial complexes with no reports of problems. Therefore, compatibility problems associated with this proposal ace not expected. ~~~I ~~ PLRNN ING COMM IS EI O! 7AFx^ REPORT CVP 91-17 - WILILIWS ~0[14UN ITY CHU RCP. Sane 26, 1991 Page 3 Parking. A total of 415 parking spaces are required for Phase I and II including the health club and proposed church. Currently, there is a total of 468 parking spaces available for Phase I and II. A total of 32 parking spaces are available for the proposed church Facility. The church has 240 seats which would require 60 parking apecee (260 /dm60 ). However, because of offset peak hours, no conflicts are antieipnted as a re salt of the church use. The proposed Chnffey Adult Bchool's Mommy 6 Me classes and the ARISE Academy classes will create a higher parking demand during daytime hours than would otherwise occur for the church use. Of particular concern are the Mommy 6 Me classes, which involve mothers and their infante/toddlers in planned activities because it can be assumed that each mother will drive to the class and stay. The Development Code parking standard for schools ie one parking apace for each faculty member and one apace Por every three students. However, staff believes that additlanel pazking Ss warranted in thin case and wouid recommend that one pazking apace be provided for each faculty member and mother. Therefore, class size should be limited during daytime hours to no more than 29 mothers and faculty aembere. This figure ie based upor. the church office use requiring three spaces (two pestore and a secretary/recept!onlst per Exhibit "D^) and a maximum available parking of 32 spaces for this Leasable apace. It should also be nosed Chat prior to the withdrawal of Conditional Uae Permit 86-20, the Lewis Company was proposing to build an additional 95,000 square feet of office apace within Phase III of the Terra Vista Business Center, thereby impacting the parking fncilitiea for all three phases. Because of the previous Family Fltnese propoea 1, staff hoe been informed that the Phase III parking Sesues wiil be addressed through the reduction of square footage within Phase III or a parking study will be conducted by the Lewis Company for the center (See Exhibit "E"), to justify a joint use parking agreement. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Upon review of Part 1 of the Initial Study and completion of Part 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no si gniPlcant impede related to a church facility within an Office/Business Pack. ~N~T~" ?CANNING COM-YI SSI O' .'P.FF REPORT CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS iOMMUNITY CHURCH Jane 26, 1991 Page d IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A. That the proposed use Sg in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Terra Vista Comnnirity in which the site is located. B. That the proposed use will not ba detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C• That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable orovisiona of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Development Code. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advartiaed as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Hull ti newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project Bite. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Cammi9aion approve Conditional Use Permit 91-17 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and iseuence of a Negative Declaration. Reap 11 , Bra 1 / Ci Planner BB:JG:jg Attachments: Exhibit "A^ - Sita Uti li ration Exhibit "H" - Sita Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Letter from App Li cant Exhibit "E" - Letter Erom Lew 19 Exhibit "F^ - Pazkinq Calculations rri~ !~ J ~' _ e~~'~GS~r+w ~~, ~?~ CITY OF RANCFip~. _~UCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION b _C RANCHO CUCAYONOA C\NTRAL SARK (PILE: Stt~ 1.1 1 ~ ~;, EXHIBPP: ~1q SCALE: >' t i..,,~. fr ` ,Y . ~~~' ~~ w`7!. u.nuo~ `h~ ~,. ~~a._ +n ~, N i ``A'^' `~~. ~..^,~ 1 CITY OF F~fWCFiCS ,QUCAMONGA PLANNING• DIVISION EXFIIBIT: ~ SCALE: N D x m ~ ~ g m ?"a~ r= ~~ ~ ^N S~ ~ ~m N (!1 ~ ~ m y e a 1 '~o~a ~3 ~g i N n rtl ]j~ P m NeiphEOr: Copy ~, Shop n m 'o m m Z m, i _~~, ~~,J ppZ •' ~ "~ @ ~ T, ~ O y m N 3 <~ aEx~~ s~ T° ~ ~ > ~~ a> °se m x ~ $ D ~ `~ '''' ?~' S x ~ m ~ ~ 4~ o m a i ~ @:~' ~~ ~ ~ a $~ ~ ~~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ g~9~]Qa ~, ~ ~ ~~~ m NY pG~ ~~ L • ]'. v n a s N IT ' a ~~ ~# ~ ~ ~~ a ~ a ~" m ,. (< n fir. n.i~w.y) . ~- R ¢~ ~~ ; ..mom. N ~~ ~ Nelphhor: Cenlrel School Obtrtld 0111CS~ ~..... 'S~?~ iTEM:_~ ' ~ CITY OF ItANCI-~(.~.,~UCAMONGA TITLE: ~~~ ~~an PLANNING- DMSION EXHIBIT:,C SCALE: ~ _ N ~I~VI ` r O~I~VS Community ChurcFi ~vange!tcaC free Churches t7j Amerzca 'FIFE GRpM1Vn>~ PL7CE' aClnss: 8968:inhibaf6 Suitt 300 71ancFo Cucamonga, California 91730 pFonc: (719) 989.8553 pastors: jurrtst NnLfty Darx `Morgan ;7far.E,Gmne Concerning our proposed rebcation imo SuHes 118-te2 at the Terra Ysta Business Padc, boated at 70601 CMrch Aver.~le, we intend to Wilize the facilHies as a clwrch, wish public assembly on weekends andror weeknights, outside of normal business operating tours in the facility. TM largest number of people we could reasonaby seat in our sanctuary would M 280 in 7.960 sq h of sealing space, requiring 59 parking spaces oil business Hours. It is possible we could have some daytime Bole Bradlee arq meetings. Additionally, we wiH maintain a church oabe in the facility during rartnal d:sinesa Mars, At the presem erne, we have Iwo pastors using oaices, and will M adding asecretary/ receprbnist. We ambipate continuing to provide facilities for tM Chartee Adua School's "Mommy 8 Me" Classes, meeting MOndey -Friday between tM hours of 9 am and 2:30 PffL Arlditbna0y, we will t>e working with ARISE Academy of tM Arts, Dared In North Pomona under the direction of Manena Craig, b Offer eztertaior. classes Monday thragh Frklay from 3:00 Pm M 5:00 pm. These will not need more than the 32 spaces albtted to us for rwmtal bueinese tauro. We aze movitq from W r pesera bcatbn In the WHbws Professbnal Center, an Archibald south of 8tH Street, in order to occupy a larger tacHity with more olNwAUniiy for sgnilbam ministry in tM community. Cunemty, there ie m cMrch at the career of the airy (Foothill 8 Havenj, and signHbamty, rone in the Tena Vista community or tM western Vkloda project. we see ourselves working arm in ann wAh tM boat srinols, the YMCA, and the City ro provide wMleseme (amity ad'nNles and nurture. A special concern we have b for single parents. Our sign,'Willows Community Church" will be displayed on the twildirq in aocordartce with the Terra Vista Spn Code. 1Tank You fa your corrsideratbn. Since elJ y, '/~'~~`/~~ Fort/7e%at°LH'i `nd3ley, /`/ Pasta Cures 91-i~- SUBJECT: CUP Le'~-s Homes Management Corp. 1136 Nash Moumai~ A~~w / P.O. Sox 670 / Uplud, CJi(omi, g17t3 7I~,9i3~0971 cAX: 71tNt9~6700 Auquat 37, 1990 Na. Anna LSaa Harnandaa Planning Dapartsent City of Rancha Cucesonga D.O. Dox a07 Rancho cucasonga, CA 91739 lilt PAIQLY YITxlaa TIBIA VITA BD/Illl/ )AIIR Dear Anna Liaet LavS^ Hosea supports the City~a approval to alloy Pasily Pltnasa Center to occupy apses at the Terra Vista Duainaaa Perk. Ne undaretand that there la sufficient parking to allow the Health 9pe use rithin the Park. Ma also undaratanA that by allowing the Haeith Club to coca into the Park, there may not exist sufficient psrkiny based on the mount o[ square footage ve had originally projected in Phase III. our intention is to auW1t a revised •ite plan for Phase III, either reduoinq the aaount o! stjuare footage or raquestlnq a shared parking concept tros the City of 14ncho cucalongn. 946 Y7~17eve any further Quaational pleau contact na at (714)- Co dially, /~~GCLL-L .Prod A 1L Director at Cosserelal Oerelopsent FAtce ~, ~:~. ` CITY OF RA1VC1-ffS.,~UCAMONGA PLANNING DMSION EXHIBIT:, SCALE: N E%HIHIT "F" Parking Calculations: Number of N~miber of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footzge Patio wired Provided (Health Clab and Related Hezvicea) 4ealth club 15,230 1/150 102 Retail 900 1/250 4 Office 1,500 1/250 6 Chlld Care 670 2 2 SUHTOTAL 114 (Leased Space) Office 5,392 1/250 22 office 10,384 1/250 42 Office/Retail 7,928 1/250 H Office 524 1/250 2 Medical 641 1/200 3 SUBTOTAL 77 (Un le seed Space) Office 47,452 1/250 79p Church 8,429 1/4 sents 60 34~ (240 seetal _ SVHTOTAL 250 TOTAL 441 468 ~ Only 74 spaces are provided duri nq normal business hours. However, because of the nature of the center moat bunineaeea, with the exception of Family Fitness, will De closed evenings and weekends when church services will be held. other daytime school activities, such as Mammy b Me classes and AAISS Academy's art and media classes, will create a higher perking demand ae dlacuseed in staff report. ^ ~'~~~ ~/ ~~~ . loner Malchar asked if there was a pone ibility of getting a eor from Caltran• regartlinq how they plan to deal with the land earrye •on taspondsd that eta£t could mnke the request of S,Yltrana but it wcultl probe y take a long time to get an an ewer. commis•i~ner Mel ar auggutsdyths condition be reword to waive the fwa and requirement for un rgroundinq if the applicant co d demonstrate with soma rueunabL probabilit Chat Caltrans will pay the urdergroundinq at the time the construct the wawa . xotion: Moved by Malcha seconded Tolatey, Co is we a Negative Oaclaretion and adopt iha ras ution pptovinq Environmental Assessment and oavelowent Rwiaw 84-15 Mith ma cation to waive Enginorinq Condition d requiring Haven Avenu• undargro tli if, prior to the Uauance of huildinq permit •, the applicant un pr ids sae ante from Gltran• that the ueilitia• will be undergrounded at C rang szpsnse n construction of the tweway and with the provision th Enginwrinq coot that standard conditions era consistsni with the Oonald'• approval. Mo on carried by the [ollowinq vote: AYESx CO)Q(ISSIONEASS MCN26L, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: / COMNISSI0NLR5: VA[.LETTE COHNISSIONERSx CNITIEA -carried N.I ENYIRONIfENTAL_._AS.SYS&MENT- AND CON~TIgEAy~ISE lEPMIT~I-1 L-_ N - The ragout to establish • church and school Ln a Laassd space o[ 8, 6I9 aquas [set within an uistinq oftie+ park on 12.59 auN of land in the Oftiw Protusional zone, lccatad at 30601 Church Street - APN: 10'7'1-d71-31. Staff[ racomn»nd• issuance of a Nagat Lva D+cLraeion. Jerry Cuarracino, Aulstanc Planner, pruentad the atatf report. Chairman McNi+l ukad what perNntage o[ the prof+ci La Laud and what percentage of the parklnq area la consumed. Mr. Guarracino napondad approrimauly 50 percut of the project i• laaud and the remainder of tM building L• d+slgnated a^ off lee space K one apace per I50 square LNt. Ha reported tMte currently i• an oa+rage o[ parklnq !or the two phau• which.have be+n huili. Xs conmanGd that prior to dewlopsant of Phaaa II; tM dweloper will have to submit • rwiud ^ite plan indicating sutfieiant parking i• available. Chairman McNial opened th+ public hoeing. 93aming Caolulon MlnubJ -15- Jun+Rt~, 199 ~~~lV /~ r ~ 1 f Format Hind lay, Pastor, Willows Coacounity Church, 8958 Archibald Avenue, 1300, Rancho Cu<amonq a, stated they plan to limit the claw size for Hommy G He cl as we to Z2 mothu• and hs aid they would keep parking demsnd to maximum of 36 spaces during the day. He intl Seated they would be willing Co mark the spaces to deaignat• no church parking in front of the adjacent copy shop. He said Ghay do not wish to hurt any businease• 1ecaNd within the center. He felt LM •it• would permit the church to grow. Comma uioner Nalches asked the s1u of the eongregatlan. Pastor Handley replied approxLaately 140 people aitmd orvlcu. Ha aid they plan to hold two uzvlcss. Canmiaeioner Melchor asked if tM church plane to bu 114 Sn the future. Pastor Handley responded that they may not De able to afford to build. Mike LaeUy, Lewis Homes, 1156 North Mountain, Upland, stated M was available to answr questions. commiseloner Melchor questioned how the windows an the eouthust •ide would G closed off. Nz. Luley atabd they wn still in the proqu of reviewing the construction documenu for the tenon! Smprovearnt• and had nos a yet approved sham. He was not sure how they would solve the proDlsm. Ha thought they may [111 in the aru with something to match the adjacent wall with a score line around it w that it could later be removed. He said they did not want to use spandrel qlu a. Commissioner To11LOy eked if the window irutment would b• reviewed by the City. Mr. Guarraciro stated Lt would normally be revieweQ in plan check 6y staff. CommLSloner ToLtoy rtaUd ha would like to see the trutment return to tM Design Aeviaw Committee on a Conant Calendar bu le. Mr. Lulay agrud to the rwiew. Pastor Nindley stadd they wre not choosing to clove ot[ LM two outer window. He inALCaNd Chey wanted eo block off the Cwo center ~rindowa and would be placing window coverings over the two outer windows. Comois^SOnar Y.elcher requested that any exterior modlflcatians be presenteO to the Design Rwiw Committee. Hearing no [urthez to simony, Chairman McNiel cloud the puDlie haring. commlu loner Valletb commenud that tM Condit long Uu Permit aquest did not allow for day are. Planning Commlulon Mlnutee -16- June Z5, 1991 ~,~~~~~r „E ~, Comaiu loner Tolatoy stated that Lawia nwda to addrua Lho perking iewe for buildinga within the next pha•n. Motion: Moved 6y Toletoy, aecond•d by Valletto, to ieeu• a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolwt ion approving Env izonmental Ae•aaement and Conditional Uee Permit 91-17 with modif icatiort to require that any uterlac modifications be approved by the Design Aav ifu Committee on a Conaeni Calendar b aei•. Mahon carried Dy Cha following vau: AYEB: COMNI SSI ONERBt MCNIEL, NELCIieR, TOLSTOY, VALLSTTE NOEB: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COl4!I95IONSRSS CHITIEA -carried Brad 8 ler, City Planner, recommended that the number o[ weurity nonnol and man ement staff b• Bled to Cho amount of leued opace ratho hen to tRe number of tananu. xe auggwGd requiring two wcutity poop piw tour to •ir manaq t personnel from tM time of reluw of occupa up to tM fitK 25,000 equar teat of leued apace with the addition of ne swucity i»rsan end ono manaq nt staff person far oath 1],500 Coat ve Yhat. Me thought the numDar o[ plo could Da ad~usbd by tM carom slon during the l2-month review and wid G wcurity p•reonnel should • ro both indoor and outdoor aetivit its. Mr. liar reeomm•ndod deLtin eha roquirem•nt for a cash regiator and subRit Lnq language requlri rho management wtity to notify and monitor tM vendo an their rwpo bllit lee foc llcenoinq and record keeping. Me recommended he uviow by • Planning CO®Lsion be conducted 11 monehe from eho r•lewo 0 occupancy at Mr than from tM daU of approval and sugquud addition oL a con tlon aqulrinq that all dead or dying vegetation be replaced to the wtisLcel t tM Clty Planner prior to occupancy. Commies loner Tolstoy ^eke LLwould not be poeeiblo for tM Planning CommLalon to review rho ee et an eLu if problems arias. Mr. Eul UZ respond off Lrmat ively. also eammentod that otaf[ may require additional wear guards in connect n with tM Temporary Uoe Permit required for • lal outeldo special went Chairman Mc el asked if the applicant we^ Ln • cement with the conditions. Mc. Clo • and Mr. Page agrwd to tM condltlane. McNiel closed eha public hear Snq. Planning CommLelon Mlnuto -17- JuM 26, 1991 ~;rr~i~rr NE" ~-~ UNIFORM BUILDING CARE REOUIR.,EMEN7S'FORGROUP EOCCUPANCIES ~ .._ „_ .:"•N07E: SSa MablxArlopflonAppasOlx. Group E,tkesspassclp DNlsud' '.`".: _ ~ `• Sac. 801. Grou E Occp "~~ P Pancirs shag pe: -.. .:'_.:_ ' ~', r' - 1 DlvfeMn 1. Any building uxd (orr~uradanilpurposes though thel2th~gsadc by 30 m mdse persons formme Ulan li hours per week or four hours in any'mm. day .,. - __.__ .. Dlvidon 2. Any building used foralucalionil purposes through the 12th grade _ by lass thin 50 persons fm mdse Uun I2 hours per week or four hours in any one day. Divkko{3. Any~o(vrl(drnna/ builAingAruaad~4fed°YSC'R p+,sT,p~(Ar-nose Uua su`cl'sBdreNpcaonr;Anyrciidevinlbw/din8 urrdJo•day-cmepuposnfor mare tlwn l2 priadN."• _':c ``+Mms'.r a:•.an sav For oappaory aepuerioaz, see 7hble No. 5-B.. ~. :., s, „ . , - ... j fur oeefipuiu~(odd, xe Se<6an 3303.1 "-~ Sec. 802. G) Geuerd. Buildings m pem of buildings classed in Group E hxause of the use or charr:Nr of the occupancy slWl be limited to Use types of canstrucUon set forth m 7kbles No.3L asM No. S-DaM shall nos exreal, in area m height. the Umio specified io Sectimu 305, 506 and 507. except shat she area may b: iaaeased by 50 perms when the nuximum travel disunee specJal e Section 3303 (d) is seduced by 50 percent: ~, (b)A~ap~aleSeWxaaUoaRMnfsamenla. t. DdldUooa. Far the psupme of thu chapter and BaYioo 3319, the followieg defidtmu ate applicabk: COMMON A771fOSPI1ERE, A rornmon amsosphese exuts between sooou, --' spaes m area witltin a building which art not scpuatad by an approved emote aM draft-stop barrio, BEPARA7E A2TfOSPID;RE. A separate armosphae exists between rooms, spaces m auras that ate aepua(al by av approval smoke and dnfl-stop barrio. '. SMOKE AND DRAFT' BARRIER. A smoke smE dnfl barrier consists of wills, parntiow,flaors and openings Uterpin of suchrossssrucroonazwillprtvmt - rhe transmiazion of smok,, mgases Uvough'the roNwetlon. - rate exis~ ~~~~ ~ pwivons-of shu.subtatioo apply when a scpa- ` ystem u sMnirol N eccasdusce witli Stttion 3319. Walls, parppons and floors forming:agof, pr,pvs of, oo atrrsospheric sepm- Uanshallbeofroataia.4conyisteutwith she iequisevepssJmNetype ofcsrnstruc- tloa, but of sansatructiaa swt leas efkcUve Uun a ssooke- m dnfl-stay bamu. "Glass Ughu of approval wised glass era in steel frama.may be uutallal.in such walls mprotiooa: _, ~ >',.. RESOLUTION NO. 91-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COHF.ISSION OF THE CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 91-17 FOR A CHORCN AND SCHOOL IN A LEASED SPACE OF S,d29 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING OFFICE PARR ON 12.59 ACRES OF LAND IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ZONE, LOCATED AT 10601 CHURCH STREET, AND MA.C ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-31. A. Recitals. (i~ Willaw'e Community Chutch, Pnetor Forrest Nindley, has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditaonsl Use Permit No. 91-37 ae described in the title of this Resolution. Hsreinettsr in this Resolution, the eu bj ecf. conditional Uee Permit request Ls referred to ae "the application.' (ii) On the 26th of Juna 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and tonclutled said hearing on that date. viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adopt ion of this Reeolut ion have occurred. 8. Ra eo lotion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Ccmmiesion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ea follows: 1. This Commiae ion hereby spec if ieally tind• thnt all of the facts set forth in the Recite le, Patt A, of this Aaeo lot ici ors true and correct. 2. Based upon eubetantial evidence presented to this Commies ion during the above-referenced public hearing on Juno 26, 1991, inc luding written and oral staff report e, together with public testimony, ehie Commission hereby epee if ical ly finds ae foliewe: (a) The application applies to property located at 10601 Church Street with a street frontage of 711.95 feet and lot depth of 471.61 feet and is presently improved with four office buildings: end !b) The property to the north of the subject •Lie ie developed with Medium Reeidentlal attachetl tlwelling unite (8-14 dws lling unite per acre). The propert ice to the south, east, and wart era vncnnt. (c) The applicant proposes to operate • „church with seating for 240, and with services held on weekends sad weeknights only. (d) The application also contemplates eonduc0lnq Chnffey Adult School's "Mommy 6 Me" claeuee on Honday CArough Fr Lday between the hour of 9:00 a.m. antl 2:30 p. m. In addition, a variety of art clases• will be offered, including mualc, dance, and drama, Monday through Prldny from 3:00 F•m. to 5:00 p.m. ~YNidiT 'G-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-79 CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH June 26, 1991 Page 2 (e} A total of 36 parking sparse are allocated for this lease apace. 3. Rased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced puD lic hearing and upon the /pacific findings of facie set forth in paragraphs 1 antl 2 above, thin Comniaeion hereby finds and eencludes ae follows: (a) That the prapoeed use is in accord with the Genernl Plan, the objectives of the Development Coda, and the putpo/es of the District in which the site ie located. (b) Thal the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not bs detrimenta_ to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in eha vicinity. (c) That the proposed use eomplia• with each of the eppllesbla provisions of the Deveiopment Coda and Terra Vista Community Plan. 4. This Commission hereby find/ and certifies that the project has been revlowed and considered in compliance with the Glifornis Environmental Quality Act of 1970 end, further, this Commise ion hereby issues a Negat ivs Declaration. S. eased upon the findings and conclusion/ set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and d above, this Commise ion hereby approves the tpplication subject to each end every condition set forth below. i) Approval of this ragout shall not waive compliance with all saetlon• of tM Torre Vista Community Plan, the nsvelopment Coda, and all other applicable City Ordinance/. 2) I[ the operation of the far p ity caupe adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or opertLions, including, but not limited Lo noise, the conditional Vu Panmit shall M brought before the Planning Conmiseion for reconeideretion and poaelble termination of the use. 3) Ottupancy of the Paoillty shall pQ~ commence until such time as all VniEotm Building Cods and State Pite Marshall's regular ions Nava been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fira Protection Distvlc! to show compliance. The huildin9 shall be inapseUd foz cwiplitnee prior to occupancy. 4) Any eigra proposed foz the lac111ty snap be designed In conformanre with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and the Vnlform Slgn Program for the complex and shall requite re•: Sew and r.. .I:I NG COMMISSION RES0LU2ION NO. 91-79 CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH June 26, 1991 Page 3 approval by the Design Review Committee prior to inet allation. 5) Ths fecil ity eh all be operated In conformance with the performance standards a• defined within the Terra vista community Plnn antl the Development Cotle including, but not limited to, noise levels. 6~ Church Services ar other public assembly (i. e., 50 or more p¢reonel shall Da allowed on weeknigh!e after 5:30 p.m. and an weekends. 7) "Mommy 6 Me^ claseee aeeociated with the church uee shall be limited to a maximum of 29 studEnta and faculty memher• between the hours of 8:00 a.m. end 5:30 p. m., Monday through Friday. Thi• limit Woad not apply to evening (after 5x30 p.m.) antl weekend cLuea. In no event shall any other class offered exceed the available parking for this leaee apace. e) Any exterior madi£icat lone shall be reviewed by the Deslar. Review Committee on a consent calendnt beets. 6. the Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Chairman ATTEST I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cart Lfy thnt the foregoing Reeolut ion was duly and requlariy introduced, paeeetl, and adopted by the P1ennLng Convnieeion of the City of Poncho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plennlnq Commies ion held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vats-to-witi AYES: COMMISSIONERSt MCNIE L, MELCHEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA ~~XHrr1;i ~ ~:: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Uniform Community Development Department ~ 10300 Clvk Ceakr prlre R /~ i + y+~ F1~~1`yal~Vn eecho COCamoOaa, CA 91730 (7U)9199.1831 Part . .,~ "~ /` (staff use only) I~/L r_n~~ C-o+, wty.v;~rS l_f/t-.cch~F-FCW FII,ENO.: M,n~(-. ~(~o CrJP`~I'-l7 ~o<aioo dPmtm /' /'7 f, 7/ l/-/yRCN fr ''J°//~_/~ -, n.~ ~//7l0 lyal lk+nq+o~ dP,opx(,liuawl~PwlNa) f ~ RELATED FII.ES: /077-y~2/-3l Applionn Nioc Pm,. Nvnc Jn ~,r F7/mil q69-e~sr3 Adtlrtu ' s/{ Nt% Lepl()+,r1 h'src (i(diaemt hom ehoee) ~ Rene Nvehe --•.•- GL'es T c.P v CaNO Oc~cca.+~u/T (, ~ 9/~,r/ d o< Grw/s No-«rS f ~/ v/ Y8-I'-O 97 / Adevr lIS /4`,_ //,1ovKTN/.V AvE. . UPGRNO. CN Y~?~-r Type 0/ Revkw Reque.Ged (Pkace Check All Applkahk Born) O Community Plan Amendment ~O,r pC.oMitional Uu Pemit ,q (: n~ia"on~a Uu Pemti[ (Non-Construction) ^ Dev/Design Review-COmMIMus ^ Dev/Design Review- Residrntial O Development Agrsrnent 7 Devebpment Distract Amendment O Entertainment Permit O General Plan Amendment ~ Hillside Developnrnt>4 DU ^ HiRside DevGopment S4 DU ~7 landmark Alteration Pcrtnit ^ I.a Lira Adjusbnen[ O Minor Development Review O Miror Exception 7 Prelimir[my Review 'a Specific Plm Arrtettdmmt O Tentative Parrrl Map O Tenmdve Trott Map O Vacation of Public Rigbtof-way a Easement ^ Variarce O Use Determination D Othc. •• a • Detailed Dncripion of Proceed Project (AOach Additiaul SMeu i(Neoraauy) ,.~^D/Flc-n TloN o.~ C'v n/o, rivnlryL (/JE ~c/c-w!T ~4/-/7~ /J9JlO /PaN O/s co,v T/.vvq.vtf Or CryAFFEG AOUC7 Sc//P acs Mawt,aY y. ~+c ce-Ass€r CFROM 4o^r- P )/bNo g00/e'r-; .v,o,e W/J< OA~Se/+Pa~ C cASf[t (`..+vn-FRl~ fROM 8~yt qn-1:/-tin ~f `~°t TF~C/.Q f X7£KJL/, C/jRL FF(Om 6drn TJ ~~^1, ~f!'JC Oo/c0/;u5 gL(eLgOY .•,EE ~ r -~ NC Necor nF .E -/ o c<vvr.t.<Y, I certify that I am presently the legal owrxr of the above-dacrabed pttryetty. Further, I ackr[owltbge the filing of this application and certify that all of tM above information is We and coned. (if the tudersignrd is different fmm the legal property ownep a lever of authorization must accompany this form.) ~iNdq „la./;ob5 =~fr,D-~~y ~ ~fIQ.Y~Y,°1~ Dale?i a Received Received B7 F Received Reaipl No. Fire Receipt No. ~jz~~~ ~ gk~ -~ IX- t +rN-a-Mi ~LC~LI~~II ~ ~~~~ I u~ H -F ~ ~• ^L~\ ,. ~\ o - R E a ` I, j ~\ Ai i / X / ~ u s ~ Y i a / ~ ~ ~~ V w e ~.vYl. '~ i ~ y~~ ~ __ g i _.. ._ _ • w ~ U ~~, e \ U_ ~ ~ ~.... • ~ _ ~< _~ t z o ~ it~~ ii i ._ _~ ~o~ a W ; $~ li Q`Ss=„a8 ~ ~<; 1 i. t' a~~tl ~~Ka ¢a~a , u pQ f x tl ~~'tl .Z l) } a%~ `=fig ~~~ , 1 ~~ E~ :• V ~ ~{ ~„ (~ u i 1i t ' a Y tl Y t sd~7 9---~ _,~ a~F i b;€ 8 _ F _ r _ ._T ~...~ _ ~ _ _ -._z __ _ tiVILLO~NS Community Ckurck Evange!uaf free Ckurckes of .America 'TNT yljp'li'I^~rjC 'p~CF.' adgracr: 10601 Ckarck St. Spui~z 300 +V~11L~10 Cucamoru3a, California 91730 pkane: 17l a) 9898553 pastors: forxst NurG(iy Dasw Morgan SUBJECT: CUP MODIFlCATION On May t of last year, we s~rnitted a letter of applicatbn fa Chuch and School, to be located at 10601 Church Street, occupying Suites ? 18, 119, 120, 121, and 122. Our CUP was approved on Jurre 26th, 1991, indicating in the resohaion a Church AND Scholl. We buik as the facility with full openness to an E-1 usage, which covers mae than 50 sttxtems, occupying for mare than 12 hours per weeK. The currem Ya instances' at the time involved (but were not M1rnhed to} Chaffee AduR SchooYS 'Mommy 8 Me' Classes and Arise Academy of the Arts. The Staff Report sutmtted acaaatery on page (11-2) that'Me classrooms wit host a variety d ac8vties INCLUDING Mommy 8 Me cL~sses...also...ARISE Academy of the Ads' The Cky Flames even recall olr discussion in June of a K-72th'Wilbws Chrtsttan School' (cancelled, btrt lxochve erciosed). Thus, we did nd see the CUP as dndrg W to ONLY a Yrlommy 8 Me' 8 ARISE Schad program! With this in miW. when I discoveed that Wise Oak School was havkg "growing paire' at they 19th Sheet location, 1 ahead otl faciAUes, affrmkg that we was aheady approved far a school The Dieclor of the Sctad was doAghted, and proceeded with the relacatian ar greet cast 8 short. putting her old place up far sale, seNgtg her playgouM equipment, adveRlsing, arW erro8kp new shtdems. Cftaflee's Momrny 8 Me Classes are now reloplitp to ana8la ctnrch faCAAy. Lewis Homes,ov landlord, was ddigMed to welcome Wbe Oak Scftod to the TarraVlsta Business Park, haNrg also imeipreted Mee Commission's resdutlon as approving a school. A Chamber d Cam- mace Grant Opening Mixe has txten schedule0 for August 28m, with invkatlats ahead/ Berk out. Suddeny, ova have received wad that we must restLrnh ou' CUP, with a rtrodihcation for the School, at an addRbnal lxrdertsane cost of 5435. We do not have tme ro pesem an appeal. therefore we must proceed, akhagh urWe protest. Wye Oak Scfpol wA be teachig chasm ar ahwst the exad tones as the Mommy 8 Me apeatiar 8:a5 am to 2;15 pm. They also make ava5abk thAO Cara ham 8 am and uriol 8 qn, so drop-alt and pick-tp tines are extended. Parata must sign in and sign out their chil~en. Paddng bad wiA tre less demandng than Mommy 8 Me, wRh any 5 teaches and a few Stott pre stayig. No stove a wen (dhe than microwave) wiN lxa Wed to toad preparatbn. Spnxe Park around the comer wiA be utikzed to some supervised reaearbn, m additbn ro otr own, large, muhlptryose roan. No play will Ae pemkted ouLSide the ChurcNSchod wiMin the Tema Vista BWlrlma Park. (je^rWr e~J~at The Scholl olfas classes starting b KiMegarten, curemy eWirg in 8th g The cumem studem body is about 80; prajecxed exdknem d t 20Is andcgated; the studett occupancy load is a maxinum of 133, wAh our curern lacpilim. Rancho Cucarrtaga ctrremlY has rw othe private Schad offering dosses through 8th grade. Wise Oak Scholl has a wonderfuly mixed ahnic student body. The chiidren receive personal attemfort in a smaA Schad, emphasizing rearing, wrAing and arhhman. preparing far hghe learrtkg. A variety of otter skAb are Imrned, itdtxlirig the award- winning Vibratbrls BeN Cfx>i. AddAbnaAy, the sttdertb wiN have the opportunely to take classes she scrrool n music, iGStrvnart, drama, dertca, and art ham ARISE Academy of the Arts. WiNOwa Communky ChvCii catAnum to see Aseh workhg arm n arm with local schoob, the YMCA. ono the City to provide wholesane family actlvism and sphkual development. Thank yvu fa your corsgeradon. We would appreciate a rehm d these CUP fees. E. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL VSE PERHZT 51-17 - WILLOWS COMHVNITY CH(.ACH - A request to add a kindergarten through 8th grade school to a previously approved church and school located at 10601 Church Street - APN: 30'I'l-421-31. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the et off report. Comm iaeioner Toletoy noted Chat the Hammy and Me classes had been Limited to 22 etude nts. He asked how many atuden[e ere currently enrolled in the AASSE Academy. Hr. Coleman responded that currently the ARISE Academy only hoe a small number of students in a theater group but ha noted that other claeeea may be adtletl. Commiaeioner Valletta remarked that the new floor plan listed pre-natal claeeea. SF.e asked if such claeeea were currently being conducted and if they were in connection with the church az the school. Dan Coleman responded that he tlid not know. commiaeioner Val lotto aakad wham echoola era listed in the Terra Vista plan ae being permitted in office parka. Mr. Coleman et ated that echoola eta listed under the spacial facilit tae category and are conditionally permitted in this area. commiesroner Melchor asked if staff knew what nod happened to the Mommy and Me claeeea. Hr. Coleman responded they were negotiating with other churches in order to celocate the Mommy and Me claeeea because there ie not enough room in the facility to cu nt inue to accommodate the Mommy and Ma claeae• as well ae Wiae oak School. Comm iaeioner Vallatte stated that the primezy conditional use permit applicant is the Wi:low Community Church. Sha asked if a secondary applicant, in thre case Wiae Oak Schoo le, ehou ld apply for its own conditional use permit. Mr. Coleman responded chat f,ha church already ha• an ax feting conditional use permit and they hatl appl tad Eor a modification to include tho private ec hod 1. commies inner Val lette noted that one school would actually utilize the facility for more hours than the church, and aha queationad if et off had considered having a separate Condit ionel use permit foc the ac hool. Mr. Coleman et ated that course of action had not been cone itlered. Ralph Hannon, deputy City Attorney, noted that even the Willows Comm nity Chu cch ie not the owner of the propart y, but rather a laaoea. Ha no[od [hat the school is a sub-leaeaa. Ha ramar kad that theca Se no dif Ea renca in the authority of the Planning commies ion whether there ie one lessee or a series. Planning CommLeeion Minutes ~ -]- August 26, 1592 Z~= Chairman M.c.Yiel opened the public hearing Forr¢et Hindley, Pastor, Willows Community Church, 8968 Archibald, Suite 300, Rancho Cucamonga, et aced that the pre-natal elaeeea are conducted by the church ae a non-profit ministry with classes in the evening. He noted that Mommy and Me had a definite commitment Erom one church, but was holding out for approval at another facility. He said he had contacted the Community Services Department regarding occasional use of Spruce Park and had been informed the park ie a non-reserved facility available on a "first come, ricer ee rued" baste. He felt there should not be a problem with their using ii. Chairman McNiel asked The dietence from the school to the park. Pastor Hindl¢y reepondetl that it ie only a few blocks away a<reae Churcn Street. Chairman McNiel caked how the children would get to the park Pastor Hindley said that chiltlren in kindezg atten and under would b¢ transported in [he school van and the older children would walk. He remarked that he had thought the aehool sou ld operate under Che previously approved conditional use permit without any modifications. Hs •nid the church had originally thought they would have their own school, so ha preferred to proceed with a motlitication to the church'• road le tonal ute psrmlt. Commissioner Valletta asked if there would be an additional conflict with having Wise Oak 5<hool and the ARISE Academy. Pastor Hintllsy eta[etl that the school ends at 2:45 p.m. and AA ISE tlose not start elaeeea until 3:30 p,m. in Order to allow time for public echoal children to arrive. He noted that wise Oek hoe be Eore- and after-aehool care from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and a number of parents who take advantage of the before- and after-school care and are planning to have their children attend RAISE classes. He as id that the times for dropping oft and picking up cniltlren re stretched out because of the before- and after-echoal care. He et aced that eases the arrival and dapeztura time crunch. He acid the number of participants in the Mammy and Me Qeese• was restricted because each parent came in their own car which was then parked there during the •nt ire class times. H¢ said theca would ba lea• care parked in Che 1st during the day wish Nice Oak School becauw there would bs one teacher per elas• of 20 or so students. Commissioner Ve1leLte observed that the originally approved conditional ues permit limiGtl the Mommy 6 Me claeaee to a maximum of 29 etudent• and [acuity members. She Celt It had bean clear that the original approval wa• only for the Monvny 6 Me claeee• and rile ARISE Academy, which would be short term claeaee. She questioned where the confusion had beer.. Pa etor Hintlley stated the title of Lhe June 26, 1991, eteff report had referenced a request to e9tablieh a church and echoo 1. He ea id ha now understood that any time [hare are classes, it is called a school. He noted that [ne original staff report had also indicated the "claeeroome will hoer a Planning Ccmmiee con Minutes ~ -R- August 26, 1992 variety of act iv it iee including Hammy d Me cLaeees. The church ie oleo affiliated with the ARI50 Academy..." He st atetl the reeolut ion also referenced the Nommy 6 Me cla saes and a variety of art classes. He felt the et at emante had been inclusive rather than exclusive. He noted that the reeolut ion had limited the number of atudente for the Mommy 6 Me claeeea, bus not Ear the ARISE Academy claeeea. He therefore felt the lim stet Lone were only for the Monsny 6 Me classes. Chairman McNie1 st ate3 that one of the reaaona for the limitation waa the parking situation. Paster Hindley stated he had been confused and he thought more exclusive statements wcv ld have matle it more clear. He said ha had thought that moving out the Mommy 6 Ma elasees and moving Ln the Wiee oak School would roG be a problem becau ee they operate on approximately the vane hours and he fsli the parking demands would De lase because parents would be dropping off children rather than st ay inq for claeeea. ^arle re Weber Forney, 6940 Coheny Place, tD, Rancho Cucamonga, et ated eha waa available to answer queatione. Commissioner Valletta noted that the pr imnry user is the Willows Community church and she believed eignage for the church would remain. 5hs ae ksd how Wise oaks School would addreea the eignage issue. Me. Forney elated there ie a square monument sign on the Bide of the building that ident if iee the school. Sha said there ate also signs on windows to Lead parents to the correct entrance way in addition to a temporary advert Laing banner. Commies io nez Valletta asked if the school would bs eat ief Led with no major siynage at she Bite. Me. Forney felt that would rtot Da a p[oblem because people would know where they are after a period of time. She said they will advertise in local newapapere, etc. to let people know whets t4ey are located. Commieaioner Valletta asked the plane Eor the uea of outdoor play areas. Me. Forney acid there i• an indoor gymnasium in the building which will De ut ilizad, eepac sally on rainy or hot days. She ea id it allows for basketball, volleyball, and indoor gym eport• and they would bs getting indoor equipment for younger age children. Sha stated they would also be utilizing Spruce Park for their physical education program. She said they would go through eha Park and Racreat ion Department to gain use of the baseball diamontl. Commissioner Valletta asked how often students would be at the park Bite for outdoor play. Me. Forney said there would probably 6s several of their groups at the park on a daily basis, mostly in afternoon hoots. Planning Commies ion Ninutee ~ -9- Augu et 26, 1992 Commissioner Valletta naked if private schools have state requirements oz gu idelinee for a certxin amount of outdoor play area. Me. Forney responded she did not think there were any such requirements of private achoole. Commissioner Vailette thought that an outdoor play area is required for Eac ilitiee pccv id ing day care. She asked if the facility would rot come under those guidelines since they are offering extended case hours before and after school. Me. Forney stated that they would prObab ly be taking the younger age children to the park on a tlally baste to have outdoor play. Sha said they would be taken to the park by van. She said they would also use the gym. Commies ienez Melcher asked if Ms. Forney had operated Wise oak School at its facility on 19th Street. He. Forney responded affirmatively. Commiseionec Me lc her not ad thnt when Ma. Forney had appeared before the Planning Commission in July 1991, rood it loos had been placed on the 19th Street facility for its continued use ae a eehool. Me. Forney agreed that at roar tuna the Conission had approved the project which had been submitted. She ea id there had been several delays regarding their plan work. She stated it had been financla Lly exhausting and stressful to try to ccmply with the raga trements. She eaitl eRe [e It the move to Chia new location would be better becau ee she would no longer Rava the financial burden of trying to meat the raga iremen[e placed on the 19th St [set Eacillty and it would allow the school to yrow. Commies inner Nelcher asked if the required physical improvements had ever been made to the 19th Street facility. Me. Forney stated the physical improvements Rad not beer. made and she was not sure of the technicalities of where Cney were in the process with the Lr plena. Commisa iener Melcher noted that proposed Condition No. 3 for the Haw fecil ity orates Chat occupancy shall not commence until all Uniform eu ildinq Coda and State Pira Marshall's raga lot ions have been complied with. Xa asked if the school had not already commenced occupancy. Ns. Forney acknowletlgetl they ware currently moving into the building. Factor Hindley said that all conditions ware met last year for E-1 occupancy. Ha alai ed he had fir et applied for an E-3 occupancy level, but discovered that would only allow them to have children Lhero Eoz a maximum of 12 hours per week. He said they proceeded with designing the building for E-1 occupancy, but the designation Haver got changed on the paperwork. Xa remarked that Aon Nee Erom Lhe Fire Oietrict had recently indicated Che building masts E-: occupancy requirements and Pnil Moeiey from Building and Planning Commission Minutes ~ -10- August 26, 1992 Safety had indicated things look good. Commissioner Tolaioy asked if there has bean a final ins pa ction pastor Hind lay re eponded that the final inspect tort occurred last summer Eor E- 1 occupancy, Cut they had to pay another $50 to formally change it to E-1. Ne said Rcn Nee confirmed and Phii Noeley has checked it out that it ie legitimate for E-1 occupancy. Mr. Coleman at ated tRat he had talked to both Ron Nee and Phil Noeley and they indicated she church had boon requiretl as a correction nn the plan check to change the plane to an E-3 occupancy because the building did not meet E-1 occupancy requirements. He Baid th0 bu lldinq had been approved, inspected, and Permitted ae E-3 occupancy. He reported that a letter had been issued this week regarding the change Erom an E-3 cccupancy to an E-1, and it requested additional plane and information including an emergency evacuation plan. He said he understood that the church has already begun to respond to a number of the items, each ae exit signs. Ha said >c did not appear there is arythinq major, but it ie at ill in plan check. Commissioner Melchor et ated Re hatl been concerned about the E-1 occupancy. He said he had spoken to the Chief Building Official who said thei the Building Department ie eat iefied on most of the major iceuee. such a• coacidoc uldth, etc., but a number of minor laeuee remain and an appropriate set of plena atr11 neetl Co be reviewed. He said it troubled him to have a condlt ion Chat states the occupancy eh all not commence until such time ae eha raga izemante are met when the occupancy has already taken place. Mr. Coleman stated that all non-construction conditional use permits hays the same wording to alert applicants of [ha need to take care of building and fire code issues. Pastor Hindley stated he had invited Wiee Oak School to move into the facility with the perecnal belief that they were approved Eor the school use. He ea id only after the school moved in did they race Lve nor if ices ion that they were in violation of the conditions of the approval, and they therefore applied to change the conditional use permit. He remarked that WLSe Oak School had already Bold their old playground equipment, and it would be hard to reverse the move. He said ha had submitted [hs requested plan to Phil Noeley on August 25 and the pl ar. is current ly being reviewed by Building and Safety and the Fire District He indicated he had aloe talked to the Patk and Recreation department to addtaee concerns ra Teed by staff. Commissioner Valle<te referred io the minutes of .Tuna 26, 1991, and noted chat she had clearly stated that the conditional u9e permit did not allow for day care. She said she had made the statement at Thai meeting Eor clarif is ni ion as to uha[ was being voted on and there had been no response Coat day care was be my requested. She Celt it should have been clearly understood that day care was prOh ib it ed. Pastor Hindley et ated they are not proposing a day care facility, Planning Commission Ninutes % -11- August 26, 1997 Comm ieeioner Vailette felt the bef cr e- and after-school care is day care. Pastor Hindley stated that tlay core refers to a pre-school in educational terminology. commies io ner Val lette felt that day care also applies to before- and after- school child care. Pastor Hird ley stated that pre-schools ere required to have atljoining playground fac ilitiee, but there is no such requirement for a grade echoo 1. Commies Toner Valletie asked •f he was atat ing there are no et ate guidelines for private echoo la equivalent tc public school yuitle lines requiring outdoor play areas. Pasto[ Hindley stet ed thaC private schools are not required to have any playground facility at all. He referred back to Building and Safety requeata. He said they had already installed the requested ox it signs and eubm fitted the requ eared plane. He said they have emergency evacuation plane posted an [he walla, but they still have to eu bm it an evacuation plan packet to the Fire District. He felt it would be easy to merely pull tRe plena oft the walla and put them in a packet and submit them and ha Lnd icated he was waiting for a return call Erom the Fire Dietrici regarding congregation po int e. Commissioner Valletta ae ked if the school fie required to nave monthly fire drills. Me. Forney et atstl they ere noL required to have dri1L, but they do anyway. Debbie Baker, 7"120 Paramount Court, Ranche Cucamonga, across the arrest from the facility. she said she noted that there had been an edvertiaement in the Penny Saver foe a pro-kindergarten Chtough 8th grade echoo 1. Sho felt it should be con aidered a pro-school facility and she caked [het the Commission consider the safety of the children and the fact Ghat there ate no crosswalks going to the park. She also felt the location in a buaineee park fie not conducive to education. she was concerned about the projected numosr of etudente, 125. she felt there anou ltl be an adjacent outside playground tacll lty. Joyce eckho [f, 11869 Antler Peak Court, Rancho Cucamonga, tnought 20 etudente per close in R-8th gredee would ba a lot of etudente. she asked if use by the private school would interfere with public achocl nee of the pack. She questioned the number of etudente using the perk et any one time and it it would interfere with citizen use of the park. Comm ieeioner Melchsc stated that spruce Avenue Park fie adjacent to the Ruth Mucear Mitld le School site and ne recalled that the school was planned with Lte playground contiguous with the park and a certain amount of joint use between the acncol and park had been planned. He did not know if that wa• et ill the case. Planning Commission Minutes % -12- AugueC 26, 1992 Brad Huller, City Planner, stated the Auth Musser School ie et ill planned to have a joint playground/park connection. Me said to hie knowledge, Wice Oak School had not indicated it would De using the park to the frequency indicated this evening. Ke said the park ie unreserved and there ie nn guarantee it would forever be available to Wive Oak Schoo i. Ccmmieeioner Melchor felt a private, profit making entity should not base itv business plan on making use of a public Eecility on a permanent baste. Me. Forney said they are a non-profit agency. Sha said they advertived av Pre-H, but they at art at 4 years, 9 months, so they are considered and licensed ae an elementary school, not a pre-school. Bha said they would not allow [he chi ldzen from grades kindergarten through second to walk to the park unless there was strict eupervis ion in going [hero. She said they planned to use the school van for taking those children to the park. She felt the older children could walk together to the park on nice day a. She said they woultl closely auperv lee the children on the way to and from the park antl at Lha park. She said they even plan tc use cellular phonx• to connect to their office while at [ha park. Sha said there would be a mar imam of 25 etudent• at a time at the park. Hearing no further teat imony, Chairman HeN1e1 closed the public hearing. Chairman NcNiel questioned the need for private echoole to have outdoor play areas. Mr. Coleman stated he had researched eM matter and there i• no requirement for a private school to have an outdoor recreation area. Chairman NcNiel asked iE there ie a physical sducet ion requirement for private echoole. Mz. Coleman stated he had not asketl Commissioner Melchor recalled regueeting the eetabl iehment o[ a business park rn Terra Vista when M worked Eor [he dweloper. Hs acid h• nmemberatl narking over the Liet of uee• which wars acceptable to the Planning Commiceion and staff and alec workable from the developer'• standpoint. Hs •sid thnt l taring diecuaeec community uses which could inclutle publ lc and private echoole, but he did not Delieva it was the intent of the City or the davelopec at the time the nee was established eo have a kindergarten through 8th grade school or. that site. He questioned it the developer ie completely Ln nccocd with the current request. Chairman MCN Lal reopened the publi: hearing. Don Thompson, Lewis Momea, P. 0. Box 6lOr Upland, atatsd they are in accord with Daving the ec hool at that location. BE HJ1ID EE DOE! NOT DATE NACR AE ~11R AB JO@7. He did not know iE It was originally intended that a eehool would be in tM buainec• park, but he stated the developer did not have any objections [o the nee, Flanning Commiev ion Minutes ~~ -13- August 26, 1992 Chairman McNie1 again cloyed the public hearing Comm ise inner Toletoy stated hie biggest concern ie that the school currently has 80 students and projects up to 120 students. Ha etatetl that when achoo lv are designed, there ie thought to site planning for proper circulnt ion to provide adequate student drop-off and pick-up areas. He erased that need was not considered at the time the parking lot was designed because it is a business park. He said he realized that some etudenta may travel together, but ha quest TOned if there would be a conflict in traffic flow with approximately 100 vehicles drooping off etudenta before 9:00 a.m. when the other bueineee facil it ie• in the park will probab iy also be opening between 8:00 and 9:00 a.m. Na not stl that the auite• next to the propoved school are currently rented by the Central School District with a minimum work force but large trucks delivering to the sits. He felt that when the school district moves oui and there are more individual businvese• in the park, there may be more traffic conga et TOr,. He also noted there is a lot of traEf ie on Church 5tceet and there Se no atop sign at the corner of Terra Vista Parkway and church Street. He felt people attempting to leave the vita would have a long wait on Terra Vista Parkway if attempting to crow or enter Church Street going west. He remarked that the Engineer had indicated that the corner would eventually be eignalizad, but it ie not high on the priority list. Ha was also concerned about the children crossing over Church Street to go to the park. Commiseicner Val latte agreed that parking i• an Lsus. she was also eoncarned about congevtion problem with patsnc• picking up student• from school antl other perente dropping off student• to attend the ARISE Aeetlamy. She agreed there may be traffic conf liety. Aha felt the children should have an cpportunity to play outside but she was concerned about hey ing iha children crcea the street antl eha questioned iE the pork was intended to be used by private day care or eehoole. She felt the lack of outdoor adjacent play area was a major ie sue. She thought the Comm Tee ion ehou ld determine it the Bite ie appropriate Eor a school. She Ee It that even if the state dose not require private echocia to ha~•e nutdoor play areas, it would still be within the purview of the Commission to determine iE the uea is appropriate in Ch ie location because of the lack of adjacent outdoor play area. Sha did not feel the uee was appropr iat• in this location and she did not know how it could be matle safe. conmieeioner Toletoy stated that when the church was last before the conuniesion, hs had voted for the Mommy 6 Ma program because of the limit on ^_he number o[ students par Glees. He felt oven the projected 22 student• for Hommy S Ma we• excaesive for a bueineee park. Ns remarked the bueineee park was designed for bueineeeee, not achoo l• and he felt 120 etudenta would be Coo much of n strain on the facility as it ie designed. commieeioner Valletta felt there was no problem wish having totld Lers indoors for 2-1/2 hours Eor a Mommy 6 Ma cla •s, but eha did not foal it is appropriate to hove children indoors Eor an extended period of tune or even 6 hours without the availabil iiy of outdoor play areas. Shs noted Chat soma ttutlents could potentially be there from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Planning Comm lesion Minutes ~ -16- Augu et 26, 199] Commissioner Me lc her noted that the raeo lotion provided Por termination of the uee if the Commission Later determines there are adverse eEfeexe upon adjacent bueineeeea. He questioned if the permit Eor Wiee Oak School coultl bs terminated without terminat in9 the uee by Willows community Church. Commissioner Valletta stated Lost waa why she had euggeetetl a separate Condit ioral use permit. Hr. Hanson et atetl the applicant had requested a modification to this part iculat aspect of the Bond it Tonal uee permit. He said it would Ds cleaner to have two separate conditional uee permits but it would be poaeib le eo control the offending part of the act ivit ice conductetl on the site. Comnieeioner Valletta asked if legally the uee could ba cone idered a sub-use even though the majority of the bouts wcu ld ba Eor that uee. Mr- Hanson said that was correct. Chairman McNiel Eelt that the parking arrangement in front of the school ie a treacherous situation. Ha also thougni the uee of the park was f[ightaninq because church Street is n well traveled thoroughfare. He felt that even older children walking en moose to the park would be a tliaaster waiting Co happen. Ne thought the whole concept had bean driven by the wrong forces and ne Eelt Wiee oak had attempted to shoe-horn into the fac it Lty. He Bald if the Commission were approving anotnec school facility, there would be spprapriaia drop-of£ areas, Eanced play area, end other neceaaary tacil it iea. He said the cond itione which were applied to the Wiaa Oak School facility on 19th Street were no different from what should apply at thi• location because it concecne the safety and welfare of the children. He did not feel It mods any sense to ignore those requirement e. Ne ea Ld hs wa• ewers toot the grand opening was ec hatlu led for Augu et 27, but ha et ill felt the right thing to do was is deny the application. Commissioner He lcher stated it ie a matter of state law chat it is oat neceaeacy to provide outdoor playground factltt iea at a private school. He thought if that ware the choice of the operator, ha wondered Lf the Commie•ion should impose that sego Tremont on the operator. Ha noted the facility ie located on private property and he felt it the landlord end the tenant were walling to absorb the riake aeeotiated with iha circular loo pattern, [he Commission should parAapa be willing to let them tlo eo. He thought perhaps the Commission should 9o ahead and approve the conditional uee permit. He said hie one serious reservation hatl Co do with laevLng the Bite end traveling to the park and he Ealt ehs park should not be used on a regular bee ie. Come aeeioner Valletta felt the Commission nod a duty to oppose the uee because the safety of children ie amportant. She noted that many timsa the standards of the City have been higher eha r. surround ang communit iea. She felt that ie way many people take pride in being reaidante of Rancho Cucamonga. She thought that they enouid Lego ire an adjacent outdoor ploy ersa even i£ th• et ate code dose not require one. She did rot think the locst ion ie appropriate. Plar.ninq Commies ion Minutes /~ -15- August 26, 3992 Motion: Moved by Valletta, seconded by Tolst oy, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial for adoption at the September 9, 1992, meeting. Commissioner Toletoy et ated he partially agreed with some of commiaeionec Melcher'e thoughts. He said that one of hie thoughts was that theca i• no state requirement for an outdoor playground. Although he felt there should be adjacent outdoor facilit iee, he quaetioned if the Commies ion could place such a requireme rt on a private school. He felt the important issue was that a O an inese park ie not properly designed Eor a school drop-o Ef and •ign-in of students at the same time that employees of other businesses are arriving. Ha said if the application were £or another facility, the Commission would make sate there was appropriate traffic circulation and outdoor play tacilit iee were provided. Chairman McNiel said the Commission can strengthen state requirement e, but cannot diminish them. Mr. Buller stated that under the conditional use provie ions, the Commies ion must Eind that the use Se appropriate and compai ib la with its aurroundinge. He said Conditions can also Da imposed. He said that if the Commie lon determined that the use would only be appropriate with adjoining adjacent open apace, the Commission could either require the open apace or deny the ues because the open apace ie not available. Hs stated the Commission must determine the compatibility of thl• use to surrounding uses. Commissioner Melchor noted that staff had recommended approval. He asked if any new information had surfaced Chia evening [hai would alter its opinion, or if eta Ef would stand by its initial reeommendat ion of approval. Mr. Buller stated the use of the park had been deferred to [hs •talf of the Park and Recreation Division and they had not expressed a concern about the use of the unreserved community park. Howevec, ha aaitl that na ither hs nor the Park at off had been aware of the intone ity of the use now being suggested antl hs would ba concerned iE the •ehool wa• depending upon availability of the park. He remarked it had been hie prey ioue underetantling that ues of the park would be infrequent, occasional, and unnecaseary co the program. He said he woultl at end by the original rscommendacion of approval only if the school wets to indicate that the use of the m+rk w+e not going to be a key element of their business. Chairman McNiel ae ked iE the motion and second still stood. Comm ie eionare Valletta end Toletoy responded efEirmativa ly. The motion to direct staff to prepare a reeolut ion of den iai for adoption at the September 9 meeting carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, 'JALLETTE NOES: COMMI59IONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA -carried Planning Commie eion Minu bs % -16- August 26, 1992 1 RESOLUTION N0. 91-79A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO• 91-17 TO ALTAW A PRSV ATE K-8 SCHOOL IN CGNSJNCTION WITH FuN EXISTING CHU ACH IN A LEASED SPACE OF 8,429 SQUARE FEET WITN IN AN OFFICE PARR ON 12.59 ACRES OF LAND IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ZONE, IACATED AT 70601 CHURCH STAE ET, AND MA%ING FINDi NGS Iti SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-31. A. Recitals. (i) Willows Community Church has filed an application to modify Conditional Dse Permit No. 91-17 as described in the title of this Resoiut ion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of August 1992, the Planning Co~isaion of tha City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearirq on the application, concluded said hearing on tt.at date, and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial. (iii) On Sep [ember 9, 1992, the Planning Commission took no action regarding the Resolution of Denial and directed staff to re-advertize the public 'nearing for the ne xi available meeting to allow for consideration of new information and additional public testimony. (iv) On the 14th day of October, 1992, the planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All le gel prerequisites prior to the adoption cf this Resolution have occurred. B. P.esolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the P 1ar.ning Comnieaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as £ollows; 1. This Commisslon hereby apecif ically Finds that all of the facts s_t forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substan tial evidence presented to this Commission during the ab<rve-referenced pubLio hearings on August 26, 1992 and October 14, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a1 The application app lies to property located at 10671 Church Street with a street frontage 711.95 feet and a lot depth of 471.61 feet and i.s presently improved with four office buildings, and PLANNING COMMISSION 30>SOLUTION NO. 91-79A CUP 91-17-WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH October 14, 7992 Page 2 (b) The procerty to the north of the subject site is developed with apartments (0-14 dwelling units per acre). The properties to the south, east, and west are vacant. (c) The appii cant proposed to operate a church with seating for 240, and with services held on weekends and weekn iyhts only. (d) The application also contemplates the operation of a private school, offering Kindergarten through 8th grade instruction, on Monday through Friday be taeen the hours of 0:45 a.m. to 2:15 p. m., plus child care before and after school, from 6:00 a. m. until 6:00 p. m. In addition, a variety of art rlasses wi 11 lx: of Ee re d, including music, dance, an3 drama, Monday thrcugh Friday from 3:00 p. m. to 5:00 p. m. Further, the "Mommy 6 Me^ classes will be discontinued. (e) A total of 34 parking spaces are allocated for this lease space. (f1 The application contempla ies a projected student enrollment of 120 children. (g) The application contemplates transporting etudenta by van to uee Spruce Avenue Park, located approximately two blocks away, on a daily basis for physical development programs. 3. 9a sed upon the substantial evi dance presented to this CommissLon during the above -refs rented public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in pe ragrapha 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as foil owe: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the Gene zal Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the pvzpoaes of the district in which the site is located. (b1 That the proposed uee, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not 6e detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to grope rt ies of improvements in the vicinity. (c.) That the propcsed uee compiles with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Terra Vista Community Plan. 4. This Commission he re b} finds and ca rtifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envl ronmental Quality Act cf 7970 and, further, this Commissicn hereby issued a Ne gative Ce cla ration on June 2F, 7991. 5. Ha sed upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, ?., 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the app Licatlon subject to each and eve rl' condition set forth below: PLAIiN ING COMN.I SSION RESOLUTION N0. 91-79A CVP 91-17-WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH October 14, 199E Page 3 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Terra Vista Community Plan, the Development Code, and all other applicable city ordinance s• Z) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including, but not limited to noise, the Conditional Uae Permit shall be brought before the Pianri ng Commission for re cons.tde ration and possible to rminaticn of the use. 3) Occupancy of the facility eha 1.1 not covmence until such time as all Uniform Buil ding Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Applicant shall submit plane and fees for a change of occupancy permit from an E-3 to an E-1 occupancy. Prior to occupancyr plans shell be submitted to the Fancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to show compliance. Tre building shall he inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4) Any signs proposed Eor the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Si 9n Ordinance and the Uniform Sign Program foT the complex and shall require review and approval by the Design Pe view committee prior to instal lation• 5) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the pe rforvance stands rds ae defined within the Terra Vista Cwmlunity plan and the Development Code including, but not limited Co, noise love ls• 6) Church Services or other public assembly (1.. e., 50 or more persons) aha 11 be allowed on weeknights after 5:30 p.m. and on weekends. 7) In no event shall any class or, use of the facility exceed the available parking for this lease space. B) The prl.vate K-8 school shell be conducted entirely within an encl oeed building, except for off-site field tripe or any special event approved through a se pa rare Temporary Use Pe rmi t• PLANKING COrIId ISSI ON RE 50WTION N0. 31-7°.A CUF 91-17-WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHU RCN October 14, 1992 Page 4 9; Regular use of any public park shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Services Department. 101 A11 students shall be driven to and from Spruce Avenue Park if said park is used for school activities, until such time as the intersection of Church Street and Elm street is posted as a four-way stop and a painted crosswalk inata lied or a traffic signal installed and operational. 71; The applicant shall install a student loading zone in front of the main building entrance by eliminating seven parking spaces accordingly subject to plan review and approval by the City Planner. Pavement markings and a sign, uP to four square feet in area, shall be poated rdentrfyin9 the purpose of said zone. fi. The Secretary to this Couoaission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman Brad Bu 11er, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co~iasion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a requ lar meeting of the Planning Conmission held on the 14th day of October 1992, by the following vote-to-wit; AfES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CIu.IFOAN IA, DENYING A MOOIFI CATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 91-17 TO ALLOW A PRIVATfi K-E SCHOOL IN CONSVNCTION WZ TH AN EKIST ING CHURCH IN A LEASED SPACE OF 8,429 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN OFFICE PARK ON 12.59 ACRES OF LAND 2N THE OFFZCE PROFES SZONAL ZONE, LOCATED AT 10601 CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-31. A. gecitale. (1) Willows Community Church hoe filed an application to modify Conditional Uae Permit No. 91-17 ae described in the tit le of ihte Resolution. Hereinafter in this Reeolut ion, the subject reque et ie referred to ae ^the application." (Li) On the 26th day of August 1992, the Planning Comm Lesion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applicet io n, concluded ea id heerinq on [het dote, entl tlirec[ed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial. (iii) ou September 9, 1992, the Planning Commiaa ion took no sot ion regarding the Resolution of Denial and directed staff to re-advertise the public hearing for the next available meeting to allow for consideration of new information and edditionel public teat imony. (iv) On the 14th day o[ October 1992, ihs Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public herring on the application end concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to .he adoption of this Reaolut ion have occurred. B. Re o ution. NON, THEREFORE, it ie heresy found, determined, and resolved by Cho Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Thi• Commission hereby epecif ice lly Einde Chet ell of the Eecte eat forth in the R¢c it ale, Part A, o[ this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon eu betant ial evidence presented to this Conur,i eeion during the ahova-referenced public hearings cn August 26, and Oc[obsr 14, 1992, includ ire wr It ten and oral staff report e, togathsr with public testimony, this Commission hereby epeciEically Einde ae follows: (n) Ths application applies to property located at 10601 Church Stiset with a et rest frontage oC 711,95 test and a lot depth of 471.61 feet and is preeantly Lmprovetl with four office bu ildingar and PLANN.NC COMMSSSION RESOLUTION NO. COP 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH October lC, 1992 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site ie tleveloped with apartments (8-14 dwelling unite per acre). The properties to the soot h, east, and we at are vacant. (c) The application eppl ias to leasable apace which ie presently in operation, and will continue to operate, as a church with seating for 240, with services held on weekends and weeknights only. (d) The application contemplates the operation of a private school, offering Kindergarten through eth grade instruction, on Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:48 a.m. to 2:15 p.m., plus child care before and after school, from 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p,m. In addition, a var ieiy of art classes will be offered, including music, dance, antl drama, Monday through Friday Erom 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Further, the "Mommy 6 Me" classes will be tliacantinued. (e) A total of 36 parking epacee are allocated for this lease apace. (f) The application contemplates a projected atudeni enrollment of 120 chi ld ran. (g) the application ae proposetl would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially detrimental to the persona antl properties in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site for the reasons as follows: (i) Thx Terra Vista sue ineae Park is located within a Business Park Overlay zone; hence, has been designed to accommodate business uses with double Loaded parking bays. These types of uses, such ae professional offices, are eharaeterized by long-term parking users wherein the employees generally arrive during a morning peak and whose vehic lea remain Eor extended periods of time, However, the application proposes eatablie hmeni of a private school without a des ignated student drop-off zone. Such a proposed use neither integrates with the ex iat ing and anticipated uaere in the immediate vicinity nor the long-term nature by a high turn-over rate of the parking epacee during peak morning and afternoon children drop-off times. Accordingly, the use proposed ie not consistent with the Bu sineee Park Overlay Zone and ie not eompat ibis with existing or future long-term uaere in the immediate vicinity; /ii) The appl Lc ant proposes to use Spruce Avenue Park, located approximately two blocks away, on a daily basis for physical development programs. Children woul^ walk [o the park whl.ch would require c roeelnq Church Street. The intereectlon of church Street antl Elm Avenue or Terra Vista Patkway presently contains an increasing iraffir. volume. Further, Church Street hoe no STOP sign or pe int ed crosswalk at either inter eeciion. Therefore, the school'a proposed use of Spruce Park could be detrimental to the ch Lltlren's ha alt h, safety and welfare; PLANNING COMMISSION FESOLVTION NO. CVP 91-1] - WILLOWS CONHUNITY CHURCH October ld, 1992 Page 3 (iii) The applicant nee indica[¢d the school's desire for an outdoor playground Ear its physical development programs. The Terra Vista eueineae Park Bite plan contains no open space for outdoor recreation activ itiea. The nearest public open apace available for use by th¢ school being Spruce gvenue Park, approximately two blocks away. Therefore, the cite ie not physically au iced to meet the needs of the school; and (iv) Given th¢ probability of a congested traffic flow pattern on the subject Bite ae referenced in paragraph (i) above, the presence cf the uea ae proposed in the application woultl be wholly inappropriate by markedly contributing a dangerous and congested traffic Elow pattern ir, the subject Bice. 3. easetl upon the aubatantial evidence presented to this Coimni eeton during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facie eat forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes ae follows: (a) That the pcopo¢ed wee ie not in accord with the General Plan, the objactiv9e of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the Bite is located. (b) That the proposed woe, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental co the public health, aaf¢ty, of welfare or materially inj urloue to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed wee does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Terra Vista Community Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclueione eat forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commieaion hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commieaion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1993. PLANNING COMM ISEION OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA BY: ATTEST Larry T. HcN iel, Chairmen Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, end adopted by the Planning Commlee ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, et a regular meet inq of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-17 - WILLOWS COMMUNITY CHURCH October 14, 1992 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: