HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978/06/07 - Agenda Packet�1
r
AGENDA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Wednesday, June 7, 1978
i
I. Call to Order by Mayor Frost.
2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
3. Roll Call: Mikels, Palumbo_, Schlosser_, West (Mayor pro -tem)_
Frost
4. Approval of Minutes of May 17, 1978 and May 31, 1578.
5. Announcements, APPP"# -Al STAFF 2ffM- SNOW-l' cov?RAey
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Zone Changes
(� A. Applicant: Robert Bowdoin
`O 3683 Crenshaw 1
S4 .`T Los Angeles, CA A 90008 90008 �((��ftiR.. Z1
Proposal: Zone Change from A -1 to R-I
Location: Southeast corner of 19th Street and Jasper
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the zone change to R-I be approved and
adopt a negative declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
B. Applicant: Chino Basin Municipal Water District
8555 Archibald .Avenue
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Proposal: Zone Change from R -3 to C -1
Location: Southeast corner of Archibald and Arrow Route
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that zone change to C -I -T be adopted and
to adopt a Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
C. Applicant: Douglas None
7333 Hellman Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Proposal: Zone Change from R -1 to A -P
Location: Southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the zone change to AP be approved and
to adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
D. Applicant: Donovan Schowalter
8297 Baker Avenue
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Proposal: Zone Change from A -1 to R -3
Location: Southeast corner of Foothill and Baker Avenue
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that zone change 3000 R -3 be adopted, but with-
hold the enabling ordinance for one (1) year for the submission and approval
of a location and development plan and construction diligently pursued to
City Council Agenda -2- June 7, 1978
completion, and adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a
Notice of Determination.
E. Applicant: James Van Antwerp
5820 N. Hellman
0 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
4
L�
S }
r�
f�
F
cOmv y
Proposal: Zone Change from R -3 to AP
Location: Northwest corner of Baseline and Amethyst Street
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the zone change to .AP be approved and
to adopt a Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
Applicant: R. L. Arcinage
246 North Indian Hill Boulevard
Claremont, CA 91711
Proposal: Zone Change from R -1 -1 to R -1 -20m
Location: West side of Hellman Avenue, approximately 2000 feet north of
Banyan Street
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that zone change to R- I- 20,000 be approved and
to adopt a Negative Declaration and to request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
G. Vacation of Alpine Street:
LBecause of the construction of the Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility, it is
recommended that Alpine Street be abandoned. The staff has reviewed the
proposed abandonment and finds that it is appropriate.
/'YOB /G/tI6tRAU(, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
- resolution ordering the vacation of Alpine Street and the appropriate
documents be filed with the County Recorder. AD$ pyRfseLavow
7. City Manager's Reports
A. REPORT OF SCHOOL TASK FORCE
As the City Council is aware,the School Task Force which was appointed some
I'LOYO 97►QK months ago has completed its preliminary recommendations in an effort to
-_� alleviate the overcrowded classroom conditions which exist. As an interim
measure, the School Task Force will be recommending to the City Council
that a special fee be imposed upon any new residential development to help
alleviate on an interim basis the overcrowded classroom conditions in the
elementary and high school districts.
Mr. Floyd Stork, Chairman of the School Task Force, will be presenting a
detailed report and recommendation to the City Council.
B. ORD114A NCE RE. PRESERVATION Of _TREES
ORDINANCE 140. 26
t ) All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE PRESERVATION OF
TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND DECLARING THE URGENCY
THEREOF,
City Council Agenda -3- June 7, 1978
The City Council has requested the staff prepare a more comprehensive
ordinance relating to the preservation of trees on private property in
the city. The ordinance applies to trees in excess of 20 feet in height
having a trunk circumference of 20 inches or more. The orinance provides
that no one may cut down, move or remove any tree growing within the city
limits without first obtaining a tree removal permit from the city. The
permit application would be provided at a no charge and would be processed
by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Develop-
ment may, however, upon his own discretion refer any tree removal applica-
tion to the Planning Commission for consideration.
It is significant to note that the ordinance contains an
emergency waiver which specifies if a tree is determined by the Community
Development Director or his representative to be in a dangerous condition
requiring emergency action in order to preserve the public health, safety,
and welfare, the permit requirement may be waived. However, an application
must be filed thereafter by the Community Development Director explaining
the action taken and the reason for the waiver of permit. If such emergency
condition occurs on a weekend, the Foothill Fire District may authorize
the destruction or removal of a tree without securing a permit.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Ordinance No. 26 be adopted as
an urgency ordinance.
C. ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES (First Reading).
ORDINANCE NO. 27
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE PARKING OF COMMERCIAL
VEHICLES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
Because of the problems we are currently encountering with the parking of
commercial vehicles on various city streets, the staff has proposed an
ordinance for consideration by the City Council. The ordinance will
n [ in excess or 314 to ca acI[ . In
addition the rdinance would rohibit the ar In or _,fora a overni h of
an <omme rc ial vehicle on n Public roadway. It is anticipated that the
ordinance wI a ectl ve y eliminate the parking of large commercial
trailers on our major thoroughfares. lie have encountered particular problems
on Baseline, west of Carnelian where moving vans and similar vehicles have
been parking recently.
D. ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR VARIOUS SERVICES AND PERMITS
(First Reading).
1 LIJ ORDINANCE NO. 29
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
FEES BY RESOLUTION.
City Council Agenda -4- June 7, 1978
RESOLUTION NO, 78 -25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE
FEE SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH FEES.
The staff has attempted, in a single document, to list all the fees and
charges assessed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga beginning on July I, 1978.
Since park dedication fees were established only six months ago, a change
is not recommended at this time. The City Council should be aware,
however, that a separate proposal to establish a drainage fee to help
reduce the community's storm drain deficiencies will be submitted for
your consideration in the near future.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommeded that no final action be taken to adopt
the fees until June 21, 1978. During the interim, the proposed fees will
be available for review by the Building Industry Association, the city
Planning Commission, and citizens who may be interested in our proposal.
L,. RESOLUTION RE APPLICATION FOR S.B. -325 TRANSIT FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, OF THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG)
TO ALLOCATE SB -325 FUNDS TO OMNITRANS FOR TRANSIT SERVICES
AND TO CLAIM SB -325 ROADS AND HIGHWAY FUNDS FOR THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that:
1. The City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the
Article 8 Claim, and
�l M
2, The City Council adopt Resolution No. 78 -24 authorizing the
distribution of SB -325 funds for fiscal year 1978 -79.
a. Ommitrans $133,856
b. City of Rancho Cucamonga S441,479
$575,335
F- REQUEST FOR HARDSHIP SEWER ALLOCATION - Chevron Construction Company
f3. AN ORDINANCE TO IMPLEMENT THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT (First Reading)
ORDINANCE NO. 28
G AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
W CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, TO SUPPLEMENT AND IMPLEMENT THE
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.
k
The Chevron Construction
Company has requested a hardship sewer
allocation
for tracts 9637 and 9638
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
It is
i� c�l� aifi the
recommended'
allocation request be referred to
the city
Planning Commission For consideration probably sometime after July
1, 1978.
It is anticipated that shortly
after the new fiscal year begins
the
Planning Commission will
schedule a special meeting in order to
consider
the various requests for
hardship sewer allocations.
f3. AN ORDINANCE TO IMPLEMENT THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT (First Reading)
ORDINANCE NO. 28
G AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
W CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, TO SUPPLEMENT AND IMPLEMENT THE
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.
k
City Council Agenda -5- June 7, 1978
The proposed ordinance has been reviewed by the city Planning Commission
and is recommended for consideration of the City Council. The purpose
of the ordinance is to supplement and implement the State Subdivision
Map Act which sets forth the procedure for processing all subdivisions with-
in the city. It is significant to note that prior to adoption, the Planning
Commission reviewed the comments of the Building Industry, the utility
companies, the County Planning Department and Transportation Department,
and the Foothill Fire District.
The Commission in reviewing the proposed subdivision ordinance has
recommended to the Council that all regulations concerning hillside develop-
ment be removed and handled separately in the very near future. It is
important that the city's subdivision ordinance be implemented as quickly
as possible since we will be processing our own projects beginning July I,
1978. It is recommended that one additional amendment be made to the
proposed ordinance prior to its introduction. The Foothill Fire District
has recommended that Article 2, section 2.12 be amended as follows:
The Foothill Fire District has recommended that Section (a)
(8) be added:
''All fire protection water systems, including fire hydrants,
and all fire access roads shall be accessible, installed
and operative prior to commencing construction of any building(s)
and /or structure(s), in accordance with Foothill Fire Protec-
tion District specificationa and standards."
The purpose of this recommended amendment is to make certain that developers
provide adequate fire department access and protective measures during
the construction period. The requirements would be operational at the
time framing of any structure begins.
R. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE 3/4 TON PICKUP
Our present maintenance truck transmission needs to be replaced. Based
on age of truck (1968 model), mileage (145,000), and general state of
disrepair, it would not be of benefit to the city to make this replacement.
Authorization is requested for the staff to purchase one three /quarter ton
capacity pickup truck which is essential to the operation of the park
1 ' maintenance section. Estimated cost is $7,000. (Replacement of present
fV•-/ truck was included in preliminary budget for fiscal 1978 -79 prior to this
occurrence).
Although we had planned to include funds for the replacement of the truck
in the 1978 -79 budget, the vehicle is needed immediately in order to continue
with our park maintenance activities.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
acquisiti of one three-quarter ton pickup truck at an approximate cost of
($7,000.
`_.
J. FREEWAY MAINTEIIA14CE AGREEMENT FOR INTERSTATE ROUTE 15
JQNN 571bmi This is a standard agreement which establishes the city's responsibility
for maintaining the city street or structure above the roadway. All other
freeway facilities will be maintained by the State.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution
78 -26 approving the agreement between the State of California and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for maintenance of Interstate Route 15.
STATUS REPORT ON CURRENT YEAR ROAD PROJECTS AND PROPOSED CARRYOVERS FOR
'JONN FISCAL YEAR I-9-7T--79. Report by John Shone, Acting City Engineer.
K. RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION REGARDING SP14ERE OF INFLUCENCE FOR RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. An Oral Report Will Be Presented.
City Council Agenda -6- June 7, 1978
6 AWARD OF BID - BERYL STREET IMPROVEMENTS, north of 19th Street.
(An Oral Report Will Be Presented).
8. City Attorney Reports
9. Consent Calendar
THE FOLLOWING CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ROUTINE AND NONCONTRO-
VERSIAL. THEY WILL BE ACTED UPON BY THE COUNCIL AT ONE TIME WITHOUT DIS-
CUSSION. ANY COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF MEMBER OR INTERESTED PARTY MAY REQUEST
THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR LATER DISCUSSION.
a. Tract 9240: Release performance bond (water) in the amount of $16,000
to Prado Woods Corp.
b. Tract 9109: Accept roads located south of 19th Street between Ramona
Avenue and Hermosa Avenue.
c. Tract 8956: Accept roads located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street
and Carnelian Street.
d. Tract 9131: Accept roads located on the south side of Banyan Street
between Sapphire Street and Jasper Street; release improvement security,
Faithful Performance (Road) Letter of Credit in the amount of $182,000 to
Sim Development Co.
e. Tract 9080: Adopt resolution accepting all streets within the said tract
located on the north side of Hillside Road between Jasper Street and
Topaz Street. (Recommended this be forwarded to City Attorney to prepare
the appropriate resolution for the June 21, 1978 City Council meeting).
f. M.S. No. 77 -0655 (Parcel 4 only): Accept Instrument of Credit and Agreement
form in the amount of $10,900 from Robert E Karen Packer for road improve-
ments on Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.
g. Execute Quitclaim Deed to various owners of record in connection with
Drainage Easement issued to County on July 8, 1977 as a requirement for
M.S. No. 76 -0519.
h. Traffic Committee recommendation of meeting of April II, 1978 for approval
June 21, 1978.
I. Request of an extension of time to meet the deadline for submitting a
development plan by Louis S. Bennett, Index No. W96-66. Recommended to
approve a one -year extension of time for the submittal of a development
plan with the expiration date of May 22, 1979•
j. Application for alcoholic beverage license. Mar -rod Incorporated has
requested a transfer of existing on -sale general alcoholic beverage license
at Charlies, 8108 San Bernardino Road in Rancho Cucamonga. It 1s recommended
that no opposition be voiced to the license application.
k. It is recommended that the City Council approve an agreement providing that
Bank of America NTLSA, 8700 Baseline, Alta Loma retain on deposit $8,200
for payment of labor and materials on a project of SEC Development known
as minor subdivision 77 -0559. The funds will be retained to guarantee
completion of various requirements with the proposed project.
City Council Agenda -7- June 7. 1978
Approval of Bills
10. New Business
a. Council
b. Audience
11. Adjournment
a_ f
i
AGENDA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL
Regular r Meeting
Wednesday, June 7, 1978
1. Call to Order by Mayor Frost.
2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
3. Roll Call: Mikels_, Palombo_, Schlosser_, West (Mayor pro- tem)_,
Frost
4. Approval of Minutes of May 17, 1978 and May 31, 1978.
5. Announcements.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Zone Changes
A. Applicant: Robert Dowdoin
3683 Crenshaw Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90008
Proposal: Zone Change from A -1 to R-I
Location: Southeast corner of 19th Street and Jasper
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the zone change to R -1 be approved and
adopt a negative declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
B. Applicant: Chino Basin Municipal Water District
8555 Archibald Avenue
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Proposal: Zone Change from R -3 to C -1
Location: Southeast corner of Archibald and Arrow Route
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that zone change to C -I -T be adopted and
to adopt a Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
C. Applicant: Douglas Hone
7333 Hellman Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770
Proposal: Zone Change from R -I to A -P
Location: Southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the zone change to AP be approved and
to adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
D. Applicant: Donovan Schowal ter
8297 Baker Avenue
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Proposal: Zone Change from A -1 to R -3
Location: Southeast corner of Foothill and Baker Avenue
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that zone change 3000 R -3 be adopted, but with-
hold the enabling ordinance for one (1) year for the submission and approval
of a location and development plan and construction diligently pursued to
City Council Agenda -2- June 7, 1978
completion, and adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a
Notice of Determination.
E. Applicant: James Van Antwerp
5820 N. Hellman
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Proposal: Zone Change from R -3 to AP
Location: Northwest corner of Baseline and Amethyst Street
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the zone change to AP be approved and
to adopt a Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
F. Applicant: R. L. Arcinage
246 North Indian Hill Boulevard
Claremont, CA 91711
Proposal: Zone Change from R -1 -1 to R-1 -20m
Location: West side of Hellman Avenue, approximately 2000 feet north of
Banyan Street
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that zone change to R- 1- 20,000 be approved and
to adopt a Negative Declaration and to request clerk to file a Notice of
Determination.
G. Vacation of Alpine Street: �{
Because of the construction of the Cucamonga Neigh rhood Facility, it is
recommended that Alpine Street be abandoned. The staff has reviewed the
proposed abandonment and finds that it is appropriate.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
resolution ordering the vacation of Alpine Street and the appropriate
documents he filed with the County Recorder.
7. City Manager's Reports
A. REPORT OF SCHOOL TASK FORCE
As the City Council is aware,the School Task Force which was appointed some
months ago has completed its preliminary recommendations in an effort to
alleviate the overcrowded classroom conditions which exist. As an interim
measure, the School Task Force will be recommending to the City Council
that a special fee be imposed upon any new residential development to help
alleviate on an interim basis the overcrowded classroom conditions In the
elementary and high school districts.
Mr. Floyd Stork, Chairman of the School Task Force, will be presenting a
detailed report and recommendation to the City Council.
B. ORDINANCE RE. PRESERVATION_OF TREES
ORDINANCE N0, 26
All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE PRESERVATION OF
TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND DECLARING THE URGENCY
THEREOF.
City Council Agenda -3- June 7, 1978
The City Council has requested the staff prepare a more comprehensive
ordinance relating to the preservation of trees on private property in
the city. The ordinance applies to trees in excess of 20 feet in height
having a trunk circumference of 20 inches or more. The orinance provides
that no one may cut down, move or remove any tree growing within the city
limits without first obtaining a tree removal permit from the city. The
permit application would be provided at a no charge and would be processed
by the Director of Community Development, The Director of Community Develop-
ment may, however, upon his own discretion refer any tree removal applica-
tion to the Planning Commission for consideration.
It is significant to note that the ordinance contains an
emergency waiver which specifies if a tree is determined by the Community
Development Director or his representative to be in a dangerous condition
requiring emergency action in order to preserve the public health, safety,
and welfare, the permit requirement may be waived. However, an application
must be filed thereafter by the Community Development Director explaining
the action taken and the reason for the waiver of permit. If such emergency
condition occurs on a weekend, the Foothill Fire District may authorize
the destruction or removal of a tree without securing a permit.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Ordinance No. 26 be adopted as
an urgency ordinance.
C. ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES (First Reading).
ORDINANCE NO. 27
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE PARKING OF COMMERCIAL
VEHICLES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
Because of the problems we are currently encountering with the parking of
commercial vehicles on various city streets, the staff has proposed an
ordinance for consideration by the City Council. The ordinance will pro-
hibit the parking or storing overnight of any commercial vehicle in a
residential zone except trucks not in excess of 3/4 ton capacity. In
addition the ordinance would prohibit the parking or storage overnight of
any commercial vehicle on any public roadway. It is anticipated that the
ordinance will effectively eliminate the parking of large commercial
trailers on our major thoroughfares. We have encountered particular problems
on Baseline, west of Carnelian where moving vans and similar vehicles have
been parking recently.
D. ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR VARIOUS SERVICES AND PERMITS
(First Reading).
ORDINANCE NO. 29
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
FEES BY RESOLUTION.
City Council Agenda -4- June 7, 1978
RESOLUTION NO. 78-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE
FEE SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH FEES.
The staff has attempted, in a single document, to list all the fees and
charges assessed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga beginning on July I, 1978,
Since park dedication fees were established only six months ago, a change
is not recommended at this time. The City Council should be aware,
however, that a separate proposal to establish a drainage fee to help
reduce the community's storm drain deficiencies will be submitted for
your consideration in the near future.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommeded that no final action be taken to adopt
the fees until June 21, 1978. During the interim, the proposed fees will
be available for review by the Building Industry Association, the city
Planning Commission, and citizens who may be interested in our proposal.
E• RESOLUTION RE APPLICATION FOR S.B.-325 *ANSIT FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, OF THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS (SCAG)
TO ALLOCATE SB -325 FUNDS TO OMNITRANS FOR TRANSIT SERVICES
AND TO CLAIM SB -325 ROADS AND HIGHWAY FUNDS FOR THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that:
1, The City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the
Article 8 Claim, and
2, The City Council adopt Resolution No. 78 -24 authorizing the
distribution of SB -325 funds for fiscal year 1978-79.
a. Omnitrans $133,856
b. City of Rancho Cucamonga $441,479
$575,335
IF. REQUEST FOR 14ARDSHIP SEWER ALLOCATION - Chevron Construction Company
The Chevron Construction Company has requested a hardship sewer allocation
for tracts 9637 and 9638 within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is
recommended that the hardship allocation request be referred to the city
Planning Commission for consideration probably sometime after July I, 1978.
It is anticipated that shortly after the new fiscal year begins the
Planning Commission will schedule a special meeting in order to consider
the various requests for hardship sewer allocations.
6. AN ORDINANCE TO IMPLEMENT THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT (First Reading)
ORDINANCE NO. 28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO SUPPLEMENT AND IMPLEMENT THE
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.
City Council Agenda -5- June 7, 1978
The proposed ordinance has been reviewed by the city Planning Commission
and is recommended for consideration of the City Council. The purpose
of the ordinance is to supplement and implement the State Subdivision
Map Act which sets forth the procedure for processing all subdivisions with-
in the city. It is significant to note that prior to adoption, the Planning
Commission reviewed the comments of the Building Industry, the utility
companies, the County Planning Department and Transportation Department,
and the Foothill Fire District.
The Commission in reviewing the proposed subdivision ordinance has
recommended to the Council that all regulations concerning hillside develop-
ment be removed and handled separately in the very near future. It is
important that the city's subdivision ordinance be implemented as quickly
as possible since we will be processing our own pfojects beginning July I,
1978. It is recommended that one additional amendment be made to the
proposed ordinance prior to its introduction. The Foothill Fire District
has recommended that Article 2, section 2.12 be amended as follows:
The Foothill Fire District has recommended that Section (a)
(8) be added:
"All fire protection water systems, including fire hydrants,
and all fire access roads shall be accessible, installed
and operative prior to commencing construction of any building(s)
and /or structure(s), in accordance with Foothill Fire Protec-
tion District specificationa and standards."
The purpose of this recommended amendment is to make certain that developers
provide adequate fire department access and protective measures during
the construction period. The requirements would be operational at the
time framing of any structure begins.
p. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE 3/4 TON PICKUP
Our present maintenance truck transmission needs to be replaced. Based
on age of truck (1968 model), mileage (145,000), and general state of
disrepair, it would not he of benefit to the city to make this replacement.
Authorization is requested for the staff to purchase one three /quarter ton
capacity pickup truck which is essential to the operation of the park
maintenance section. Estimated cost is $7,000. (Replacement of present
truck was included in preliminary budget for fiscal 1978 -79 prior to this
occurrence).
Although we had planned to include funds for the replacement of the truck
in the 1978-79 budget, the vehicle is needed immediately in order to continue
with our park maintenance activities.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
acquisition of one three-quarter ton pickup truck at an approximate cost of
57,000.
J. FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR INTERSTATE ROUTE 15
This is a standard agreement which establishes the city's responsibility
\` for maintaining the city street or structure above the roadway. All other
\• freeway facilities will be maintained by the State.
n
1.
\, 'y RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution
78 -26 approving the agreement between the State of California and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for maintenance of Interstate Route 15.
�. STATUS REPORT ON CURRENT YEAR ROAD PROJECTS AND PROPOSED CARRYOVERS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 197 -79, Report by John Shone, Acting City Engineer.
K. RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION REGARDING SPHERE OF INFLUCENCE FOR RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. An Oral Report Will Be Presented.
City Council Agenda -6- June 7, 1978
4, AWARD OF BID - BERYL STREET IMPROVEMENTS, north of 19th Street.
(An Oral Report Will Be Presented).
8. City Attorney Reports
9. Consent Calendar
THE FOLLOWING CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ROUTINE AND NONCONTRO-
VERSIAL. THEY WILL BE ACTED UPON BY THE COUNCIL AT ONE TIME WITHOUT DIS-
CUSSION. ANY COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF MEMBER OR INTERESTED PARTY MAY REQUEST
THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR LATER DISCUSSION.
a. Tract 9240: Release performance bond (water) in the amount of $16,000
to Prado Woods Corp.
b. Tract 9109: Accept roads located south of 19th Street between Ramona
Avenue and Hermosa Avenue.
c. Tract 8956: Accept roads located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street
and Carnelian Street.
/ d.
f.
Tract 9131: Accept roads located on the south side of Banyan Street
between Sapphire Street and Jasper Street; release improvement security,
Faithful Performance (Road) Letter of Credit in the amount of $182,000 to
Sim Development Co.
Tract 9080: Adopt resolution accepting all streets within the said tract
located on the north side of Hillside Road between Jasper Street and
Topaz Street. (Recommended this be forwarded to City Attorney to prepare
the appropriate resolution for the June 21, 1978 City Council meeting).
M.S. No. 77-0655 (Parcel 4 only): Accept Instrument of Credit and Agreement
form in the amount of $10,900 from Robert 6 Karen Packer for road improve-
ments on Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.
g. Execute Quitclaim Deed to various owners of record in connection with
Drainage Easement issued to County on July 8, 1977 as a requirement for
M.S. No. 76 -0519•
h. Traffic Committee recommendation of meeting of April II, 1978 for approval
June 21, 1978.
i. Request of an extension of time to meet the deadline for submitting a
development plan by Louis S. Bennett, Index No. W96-66. Recommended to
approve a one -year extension of time for the submittal of a development
plan with the expiration date of May 22, 1979.
j. Application for alcoholic beverage license. Mar -rod Incorporated has
requested a transfer of existing on -sale general alcoholic beverage license
at Charlies, 8108 San Bernardino Road in Rancho Cucamonga. It is recommended
that no opposition be voiced to the license application.
k. It is recommended that the City Council approve an agreement providing that
Bank of America NTCSA, 8700 Baseline, Alta Loma retain on deposit $8,200
for payment of labor and materials on a project of SEC Development known
as minor subdivision 77-0559• The funds will be retained to guarantee
completion of various requirements with the proposed project.
City Council Agenda -7- June 7, 1978
I. Approval of Bills
10. New Business
a. Council
b. Audience
11. Adjournment
Planning Commission t•linutcs (cont'd) April 12, 1978
Tie i ghbnrhood f;ICI lit, f ov 1Lied i,y the ('nun I wll ich will inc l udc hen It ll care
sore ices, rec resit ion progrnuls for youth and r,clu•raI srrvi ces fact l it ics in all
facets of community op c rat ion:;. May, 1979 is the anticipated opening date of
the facility.
VIIIM: no motion by 1I'nrin, s.•cond",I IIy P,hl and c;Iv, "d by the following,
vote - AYI'S: Marcia, n:Ihl, .)onus, Itempe.l: ABSI'`,I \I`:6: 'I olslup, it was voted to
approec the chant,e of aon" franc R -S to (' -I, Indc\ \'n. W)p -85 based on the findings
and "'I "' standards as revised and recommended by staff with the following
substitution for planning staff finding al:
(1) Puc to the e.. ist ing commcrc ill uses in tho :n en, there is reasonable
I' r0I'ahility that the C -I cone 'list ict bill by cnnsi stmt[ with the General
Plan propo':Il being cnn<idercd: ;Ind 01're i:: little or no prnhnbility
of stll,stantial detriment or interference with the (alto'[` adopted General
Plan if tie C -1 district is "It (m;rtely cons i =tent with the General lit an.
1'l18Lli. !II'..ACIAG:
INPFX ':n, 1v'95 -82
MIRNI R r)F fon'IIII IJ, I4El'U. l; BAKER AVENUh.
tltonovan Schowolter)
'4r. ,Sto%"ns reported that file .q'plicatt is rcquv.st 11111 a rhnnge of zone from A -1
to R -.i nn acres to lit, I,Iit the dery l oprncnt of rill ; ;pan tnnent comp I ex. The site
fronts nn M1oih Ilaker , \vrnoc and Foothill Blvd. Buhl it is most likely that access
on foothill Iilad. ,.ill hr prohihitcd since It is dvsi«neted ns a nCnior highwny.
<t cv ens st;I tcd that staff is of the npi n coo that the sib' is not COndacivc
In :;pnrUr,rnis 111: The silo Ili II be surrnmulod by mobile i;nlnc parks. I10 asked that
findim, IIS he deleted nod based on staff's findnlc< and :ulnlvses, it was recommended
that this item; I•c rant inucd until the Gvncral Plal is adopted. In addition, it
Ills their rvcanmcndntino that the A -1 coned •:trip of property to the south of the
site bo inch;dell ill fill clan „o of -.ono. Should the PLmming Commission Iuish to
rec Ommend approval, staff recommends that the zone he changed to Ii-3 -T
?1r. Tnisim. ",pressed conrc rn over the ei real at inn prohicros. ill', Dougherty stated
that this 111`1ld h' cn\'ered with the devciopmcni sinolords. Stnff indicated that
two access openings would he recommended on Baker Avenue with no access on Foothill.
the Chairman declared the hearing opmt.
ill. Pollmna Sehow.Illor, ol•plic.mt, apnkc ill favor- of the zone change. Inc stated
ihat he did not inclwl” hi, home and Tile strip of property to the south of the
site in the zone change hecaus0 he did not watt to sac his property taxes rise,
l bore being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Garcia vtatd his concern over the use M- a high density apartment complex
next to mnhilo harms old did not fuel chin was the proper thing to do. Ile stated
hia aouc'ero that if the R :one well, grllivd, it would Tint restrict other types
of IC -, uses. >h'. Ftet'0I15 st;u,•d 111,11 "('" ;taalalds could he appl icd to the
,one ch Ing" which wnu Ll wi f 111101 Ihr em 1111 ing nrd In ;nlcc 'tilt it the site development
plum: hm1 br"n approved. Mr. Garcia sated that he was not sure the city could
legally do this.
ACI'IM: On no "n h)' 'I'elstne, sroo Ilk] "d by .Ienro:: amt unanimously carried, it was
voted to cuntinned Ih" rune fhIIIU request, index no. WS542 to April 26, 1978.
I`I IIt LII', III, IIII `71:
I'i IARI I. Ili' 'nsl. I i;Ird \ I III I: I , fill!.\ IIII. IeR ; -t,7
S /lY I'IlllNl'It nl' I'IIII til'RI'I,I fI .IAWFIZ S'l Ii1.1'I'
(Ilobert Bowdnin)
Ill, CIO lie ns r"pm'Icd Ilml Ih" npplir;nl is request i'pl a change of zone from A-I
to R -1 oil 2.3, acres to permit a minor •;ubdic1 sion on Iho west portion of the site,
'Iho snrr+ rind i ng den <It i", nrr roar unIIs per acre, and it npprn•s likely lhnt the
General 1`1,111 will designate the site with a similar density. Based upon findings
2 -
� r
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
3;ry e,vtlerorvd �
DATE May 10, 1978
FROM Douglas Payne, Associate Planner, Ext. 3685 rpr
a
West Valley Planning �,_•
TO .Lauren Wasserman, cc: City Council
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager City Clerk
SUBJECT Zone Change request for June 7, 1978 (Routine)
City Council Hearing -
Applicant:
Robert Bowdoin
P.C. Hearing
3683 Crenshaw Blvd.
Date: 4 -12 -78
Los Angeles, Ca.
90008
Index: 1185 -67
Panel: 4831 -12
Proposal:
Zone Change from
A -1 to R -1
Location:
Southeast corner
of 19th Street
and Jasper,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attached are the Planning Commission minutes, staff report, maps,
notice of hearing, mailing list and Notice of Determination.
No "T" Standards required
No withhold required
Recommendation
1. Planning Commission recommends that the zone change to R -1
be approved.
2. Adopt Nuqative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice
of Determination.
GN
— CITY COUNCIL HEARIODATE: April 12, 1978 • AGENDA ITEM N0. 3
ROUTINE ITEM
NON- ROUTII:E ITEM
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TIME OF ITEM
CITY COUNCIL
AREA: West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
FILE, /INDEX 140: Zone Change W85 -67
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from A -1 to R -1
LOCATION: Southeast corner of 19th and Jasper
APPLICANT: Robert Bowdoin
ENCINEIWAP0!ITI) r:
91 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES SIN' ON 3 -30 -78
I¢ISORr PI8EPIJU) BY: Doug Payne
FIELD INSPECTION TEAM:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
PARCEL SIZE: 1.8 acres
FISTING LVID USE: Residential and Vacant
EXISTI*,r,, ZONING: A -1
v SLAUMNUING IPND USE AND ZONING
lfr~ $T.
NOTCH: Tract 9322
Zoned R -1 -8500
VITE
FIST: Residential C17-y
Fj
Zoned R -1 OF
V
SCLTrIi: Residential
Zoned R -1 UPLAND
WEST: Rural Residential
Zoned A -1
GENERAL PLAN AND DESIGNATION:
Chaffey College General Plan /Residential 1.6 DU /AC
THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ON 1 -5 -78
DETERMINED
THAT THIS PROJCCT WOULD RAVI: ,1 NON-SIG:IIPICANT
AFFECT ON THE
• ENVIRONMENT. -- - - - ---
Water
Sewer
`, STAFF Ierrn sn� nm tal:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION;
., • •
Staff Analysis:
Requested is a zone change to the R -1 district on the 2.3 acre
site located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Jasper.
The site is comprised of two (2) parcels, each are under separate
ownership. The applicant states the zone change request was made
to permit a minor subdivision on the west portion of the site.
The owner of the west parcel desires to convey the southern 4
of the parcel to the owner of the east parcel. The applicant
further states that the site would be further subdivided at
some time in the future when the sewer capacity and school issues
are resolved.
The Chaffey College General Plan, the document which governed
the site prior to City Council action on March 29 of choosing
not to adopt said plan, called for a residential density between
1.6 and 4 dwelling unit per gross acre. This zone change request
would have been consistent with that density.
Surrounding densities are four (4) units to the acre. It would
seem reasonable that the General Plan, now under preparation,
will designate the site with a similar density.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Due to the existing four (4) units per acre density in the
area, there is reasonable probability that the R -1 zone dis-
trict will be consistent with the General Plan proposal ,
being considered.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan if
the R -1 zone district is ultimately inconsistent with the
General Plan.
3. No development plan has been submitted concurrently with this
zone change request.
4. The zone change will be in the interest of furtherance of
public health, safety and general welfare.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that the
R -1 zone change be approved.
L
NOTICE Of HeARI1VG
A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED BEFORE THE' RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY
COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED APPLICATION:
FILE NO.: W85 -67
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from A -1 to R -1
LOCATION: Southeast corner of 19th Street and Jasper, Rancho Cucamonga
APPLICANT: Robert Bowdoin
PLACE OF HEARING: 9161 BASELINE AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, 91730
DATE AND TIME OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 7, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
ANY PERSON AFFECTED BY THIS APPLICATION PWY APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN SUPPORT
OR OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSAL AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WHICH
MEANS THAT THE COUNTY FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD HAVE NOT POSSIBLE
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS,
THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT APPLICATION MAY
BE VTHWED AT THE PUBLIC INFORMATION COUNTER AT SAN BIi RNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, 113.1. E. M.ILI. ST., BLDG. 41, SAN BIi RNARDINO, CA. 92415
FROM 8:00 A.M. UNTIL 5:00 P.M. .
Question regarding the above procedures should be directed to the San Bernar-
dino County Planning Department at (714)383 -1417 or (800)472 -5694, Ext. 1417
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL
1
;illiam R. & Grayce J. Sackma
151 19th Street
Ita Loma, California 91701
02- 021 -42
'Ater & Virginia Toporek
465 19th Street
Ita Loma, California 91701
'02- 021 -43
:illiam Lloyd Corbin
485 19th Street
,Ita Loma, California 91701
02- 021 -44
.iymond E. Grant
760 Jasper Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
J2- 021 -45
oseph & Lierma Meyer
772 Jasper Street
Ita Loma, California 91701
02- 021 -46
ouis & June Johnson
190 Jasper Street
lta Loma, California 91701
02- 021 -47
irily'n Payne Groff
458 Hamilton Street
lta Loma, California 91701
02- 021 -48
'enneth & Jeanne Burroughs
710 Amberwood Drive
Alta Loma, California 91701
02- 441 -01
'.enito & Rosa Martinez
740 Amberwpod Drive
'.LTA LOMA, California 91701
'02- 441 -04
Mae N. Lees
8515 19th Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
Christine Ann Muzzalupo
7423 Archibald
Cucamonga, California 91730
202 - 024 -04
Walter & Priscilla Mellott
300 E Cypress
Brea, California 92621
201- 212 -01
Walter & Priscilla Mellott
300 E Cypress .
Brea, California 92621
Meeker Dev. Co.
132 E. Live Oak Avenue
Arcadia, California 91006
202- 441 -02
Bradley & Shelia Garberich
6750 Amberwood Drive -
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -05
Earl & Candace Wahl
6760 Amberwood Drive
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -06
Nancy L. Brown
6110 Amberwood Drive
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -07
Lynn & Cameron Reeder
8528 Hamilton Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -10
19Ai', ;L /- i /
Craig & Diane Greendlee
6769 Jasper Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -11
Philip & Karen Weingartner
6761 Amberwood Drive
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 442 -09
Frank & Carol Eagle'
6731 Amberwood '
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 442 -12
Lyle & Jean Feely
8511 Hamilton Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 444 -01
Fred & Jane Kottman
6771 Amberwood Drive .
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 442 -08
Ronald & Marjorie Chapman
6741 Amberwood Drive
Alta Loma, California 91701. -
202- 442 -11 -
Miguel & Ramona Parres•
6711 Amberwood Drive°
Alta Loma, California 91701
202- 442 -14 -
Chester & Lois Smith
8531 Hamilton Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 444 -03
Randy & Denise Kimball
8548 Hamilton Street'
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -08
Craig & Diane Greendlee
6769 Jasper Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -11
Philip & Karen Weingartner
6761 Amberwood Drive
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 442 -09
Frank & Carol Eagle'
6731 Amberwood '
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 442 -12
Lyle & Jean Feely
8511 Hamilton Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 444 -01
tanley Campbell James & Jessie Griffin T V
541 Hamilton Street 8581 Hamilton Street
lta, Loma, California 91701 Alta Loma, California 91701 I
02- 444 -04 202 - 444 -08
arry & Paulette CAldwell
538 Hamilton Street
1taLoma, California 91701
02- 441 -09
ldon & Nicki Richey
751 Amberwood Drive
lta Loma, California 91701
02- 442 -10
wren & Carol Bridges
721 Amberwood Drive
lta Loma, California 91701
02- 442 -13
'immy & Deborah Clendenning
521 Hamilton Street
lta Loma, California
02- 444 -02
ayne & Patricia Essex
'-551 Hamilton Street
ita Loma, California 91701
02- 444 -05
,rthur Bedford &
atricia Ernst
.561 Hamilton Street
%lta Loma, California 91701
'02- 444 -06
saac & Lucy De Abreau
1591 Hamilton Street
,lta Loma, California 91701
02- 444 -09
Yank & lvonne Chavez
4571 Hano lton Street
,lta Loma, California 91701
!02- 444 -07
Randolph & Claudia Delturco
6730 Amberwood Drive
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -03
Robert & Georgia Lovell
6761 Jasper Street
Alta Loma, California 91701
202 - 441 -12
Y
San Bernardino County - Environmental' ,ovemem Agency — 1111 E. Mill SL, Bldg. 1. 2nd Floor
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVI� • San Bernardino, CA 92415
(714) 3831532
NOTICE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Reviewing Authority
Initial Study Date %' o Review and Consultation Period'
EAD Log No. ] l'1 ' » Effective Date of this Determination 7' ri
Project Title and Description 7;, A,7r;. r' 1. to -1 f ,)
'i.c.� (, ,,. Y11• "11., int;n 7 1 'tr„ t0 to
r 17 1 11; r•n P......1 ';.� .,,�,,,r: - :. tt, r.:rt CliI in.; a r..: ;.., -rlard
fl_r. '
Conditions //f
Plans and specifications are available for public inspection in the office of the Environmental Analysis Division.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1870 (Public Resources Code, Sec. 21000, etseq) and the
Environmental Administrative Guidefines for Local Entities, the County of San Bernardino has determined that the above-referenced
project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding include the written Initial Study and deliberations of the San Bernardino County
.,,(.. .1,,.. !•1.; ton /F.1rr +.>.... _ .a :ic r
This decision may be appealed to the Board of Supervisors or Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFC), as appropriate, by any
person aggrieved, or by an officer, board, department, or bureau of the County. Any appeal shall be filed within fourteen (14) days
after the rendition of this decision, or it shall be dismissed by the Board of Supervisors or LAFC. The Notice of Appeal shall be in
writing and shall be filed in duplicate in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors upon forms provided by same.
This project is now ready to pranced to the "1 t "'-1''' 1fr11,11'i ;.'f"! •' 1 A r•" -• i ,. _.1 on
for project approval.
(' S'ra ..
Environmental Review Officer
Copy of this form file l eothb. Clerk of the Board of Soprvnorr
Secretary of the Planore, Commission or LAFC
Enviranrtenul Analysis Division
:rI
Gnachar.
'o °r; ^,
i:orx',o:.tity C- c•anvllaats
' S ia:1D
C ^r1 ;ti.11 Av<�tac
1'-� •
•.7.. A
Dnrnbmbs
White - APPbcant
Blve - Clerk of Board at LAfC
Green - SPansorina Covmy Arai
Canary - EAD Protect file
Pink - EAD Beading fife
Gaaar,"ed - C."
INTER - OFFICE MEMO -
cxer,.
DATE May 10, 1978 1
r
FROM Douglas Payne, Associate Planner, Ext. 3685
West: Valley Planning
TO Lauren Wasserman, cc: Citv Council
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager City Clerk
SUBJECT Zone Change request for June 7, 1978
City Council Hearing (Routine)
Applicant: Chino Basin Municipal Water Dist. P.C. Hearing
8555 Archibald Avenue Date: 4 -12 -78
Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Index: W97 -85
Panel: 4812 -3
Proposal: Zone Change from R -3 to C -1
Location: Southeast corner of Archibald and Arrow Route,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attachod aro the Planning Coimnission minutos, findings, recommended
"i" Standards, staff reprn t, maps, notice of hearing, mailing list
and ;Jotice of Determination. ,
"T" Standards rcnuircd per attachment #1
No withhold required
Rccommrndati.on:
l.. I'7 onnina Commi.ssinn recommends that zone change to C -1 -T be
adopted.
rv'.cj•!, iv,, noclarotion and request clork to file a Notice
of Determination.
ce
1l- 1'11 -0
CITY 01: RANCHO CUCA%IONGA
REGUI.A1t MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 12, 1978
The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc:nnen G:+ inot, in a regular sclIsion
nn Wodnrad,i y. April 12, 1978, nt 7:36 I+. m. in the Co:mnun i I Sri vice Rol Iding.
1110 meeting , <ns relied to order I+y Chairman Rcmpol and was opened with the
pledge of allegiance.
Commissioners Present: Merman Rempcl, Itiolvrd Il;ihl, Jorge Garcia,
(aura Jones, Peter Tolstoy
Commissioners Absent: None
Upon motion by .Tones, seconded In) Gnrcio and unanimously carried, the minutes of
the Plarch 12, 1978 Regular Mccting of the Planning Commission wore approved.
t�'PIIIti•IC III'aAIII Rr{:
CMNIT fin '_0NE I ROLI R -3 '10 C -1, INDEX SO. 1197 -8S
1PPRONI'MI. 1, 1 2nl' F/O ARROW 101111±, MTROX. 332'
Ii /0 ARCIIISAI,II AN NIB. (CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL. 19A ER I11S'I'R1C'I')
Planning stiff member PIr. Iom Stevens reportod that the applicant, the Chino
Basin Min iri Ili l Water District, is requesting n ch :ogo of none from R -3 to C -1
It' permit the capnnsion of their office parking wren. A neighborhood service
center is proposed on the northeast portion of tllo site, Mr. Stevens detailed
ill- staff report on this item avid made the following revisions to staff "T"
s Unula rds recommondod, win c should road an follows:
(1) ,A location and dovolonmcnt plan to he r0riomeJ rind approved hp the Planning
Pi reel or. Iles Ign cons idernt i oils shall inc lade but not be Iiini Lod to the
mention of Jricr• „iys, pnrkinr, :noon, si,Icwnll,s, walls, lending areas,
IanJso+i +inn, pt-nposrd signs', lighting fixtures, proposed structures and
irrigation improvements.
(2) '1110 pormitird a.es on the cestorlc pnrt on ill' the site (parcels odjaecnt
to the res ident iii puhd i v is i nil shall bo limited to those C -1 .one district
uses Ilia gill hr, in the opinion of the Planning Director, compatible with
single family residential uses.
(6) Tint all huildinrs .hall Ile in cnnformnntc with rliy sclhnck rcgulntlons.
nn•thor that no buildings shall be constructed within these minimum setback
areas.
All other "'I” st :mdands to remain the scone.
17. G:nr in ghost Toned the inclusion of the Upland ,%!l51 et:nt00 League property in
this ;,ono chango. Cilr Attorney Poip.herty sintod that this propert)' should not
1,0 inc Lido) in this item it this time since it Was not included in the advertised
public hearing.
Chnirman Rolnpel declared the public hearing opvn.
Ile, Theo " "m Ik, Assi •i unl i;rnerni Nunup. :' +' of the Chino Rusin Municipal Water District,
spoke in favor of the requested zone change.
Mr. Garcia n,led if n run -Jr -s
Slrvcm. shoed Ih:ll Iho 1.11rrI
fill,,( iii l l rags of Ili" l( .nl hi I
Thal sir.µ' provi.'. ion ^hnuld b,.
;I1'crt . ,' it)
'
i'i rc District I" warA nit non
nc will he mode ;it the cad of Alpine Street. ItIr•
'sill -OJ m: it pm :rat lc is without o cal -dc -sac
fire District sl.ilyd lh:ll it was their feeling
,::dr fol I tarn :n-nund fill traffic cumin,n, into
:ci .ln i111 ,.,I, I that staff would work with the
fire access concerns.
'Ihcre bring ne furthm' testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed.
!h•. 'Inlslov Inquired :r: Ie whni I.In,Is Of nrtivilics would be undertaken in the
County neigbhorhood facility. Mr. Ilol ley sintod That. it will be a multi- purpose
�o
Attachment 41 Chino Basin MUn.icipal Water
Zone Change 4 W97 -85
Action of the Planning Commission:
Recommends that the City Council approve the C -1 -T zone classification
generally located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald.
Findings of the Planning Commission:
1. There is reasonable probability that the C -1 -T zone district
will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to
or interference with the future adopted neneral plan if the
C -1 -T zone district is ultimately inconsistent with the General
Plan.
3. The subject zone change application has not been filed concur-
rently with the development proposal.
4. The site, in coordination with the entire corner, is suitable
for many of the uses permitted in thi' C -1 zone district in
terms of access, size of parcel, density, relationship to similar
or related uses, and other considerations deemed relevant.
5. The proposed change of district classification, modified to
exclude uses not compatible with single- family residences,
is reasonable and proper at this time, and with appropriate
buf.f.erinq and exclusion of non - compatible uses, it will not
adversely affect adjoining properties as to value or precedent
and will riot be detrimental to the area or adjoining properties.
6. Tile need for an expanded parking area as well as a proposed
neighborhood center has warranted this zone change.
7. The proposed zone change modified to limit tho commercial uses
on the eastern portion of the site to those uses that do not
,.ICnerate excessive noise and traffic and to include appropriate
buffe.rinq requirements, will be in the interest of furtherance
of public health, safety and general welfare.
9 0
Attachment kl (cont.)
Planning Commission Recommended "T" Standards:
1. The location and development plan to be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Director. Design considerations shall include
but are not limited to the location of driveways, parking areas,
sidewalks, walls, loading areas, landscaping, proposed signs,
lighting fixtures, proposed structures and irrigation improvements.
2. The permitted uses on the easterly portion of the site (parcels
adjacent to the residential subdivision) shall be limited to
those C -1 zone district uses that will be, in the opinion of
the Planning Director, compatible with single- family residential
uses.
3. Appropriate buffering and screening shall. be installed on the
southern and eastern boundaries. Commercial uses located on
the eastern portion shall be aesthetically compatible with
single - family residences.
4. A masonry wall six (6) feet in height shall be installed around
east property boundary. Said wall will be reduced to four (4)
feet in height within front setback areas. All walls shall
be designed and constructed to provide visual and physical
relief alonq the wall face.
5. That all trash enclosures and loading areas be screened from
view on Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route.
6. That all buildings be setback a min.7mum of seventy (70) feet
from the centerline of Archibald Avenue, further that no
buildings be constructed within these minimum setback areas.
CI'T'Y COUNCII, ITEAR6 DA'Z'E: April L2, 1978
RANCHO CUCAI ^•ONGA
CITY COUNC7i,
• AGENDA ITEM NO. I
ROUTINE ITEM
NON- ROUTINE ITEM
TIME OF ITEM
ARIA: West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
I'11,F /PIDEX Nn: Zone Change / W97 -85
Pp )IYY;AI•: Zone Change from R -3 to C -1
1rry \Vpttv:: 5/s Arrow Route, approx. 332 feet E/o Archibald, Rancho Cucamonga
APPLi('i�YP; Chino Basin Municipal Water District
13 J!; i tn:Ii!t/AIr'I I t'I'I1.'f':
40 1111i.iC H! %RING Z:" -71, Is sll7r ON 3 -7 -78
P T'—vf 1'p!;'"•.P17t R':; Douglas Payne —' -- -!
F 11117 it :I;PirTV'i 11014: OA.1I; Of INSPT:CPIQJ:
I7•.tn:.'.I, ;tzr:: 5.5 acres
L7;!F:'It tkl L'Jd1 I!;li: Chino Basin MWD general offices and vacant land
;;I+JUI 1: R -3
I AF:RO�V Qa1TE
SURR(I !')ING IAt1D UST; A:0 Zf t:II JG
Residential
NUIZI'11: Commercial and
Zoned C-1 6 R-3
1 Residential.
'Loners R -1
g.(tlti: School
Iien -
.S.L7-
4 SY.
tiPSl': Tentative. 'tract 9405,
Vacant, A -1 F C -1
0311 TAL PIJNJ Aai) D1;i1(- NAlJON:
U
Valley Portion, Count% G.P, / Urban Areas
Q
'I'ii T'. I ^.1?Ii Pall ,I ll'f7,1. P1,'dliW' COMMITTEE i)-,J
1 -18 -78 DETERMINED
'1'117''1' 'flit ; PPLMIICT Wo1'H) CAVI: .� NON -S IGNIFICANI'
i'.P I'1:C'I' Ov 'I'IIE
hal'Ji1PODPi P;K'1'.
_
_______..___._..__...__�Ij'1'v(
F: •n- ;;nrjq[I, tY� (:uun'nt�
CO.,, !y11'ro
U :�I'id'P RIl_�'hi•11:AV(I'II C:
1 I'EANNING COMMISSION AC- 11014:
9 0
Staff Analysis
Requested is a zone change to the C -1 district on an irregular
shaped 5.5 acre site, generally located on the southeast corner
of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The C -1 zone district is
requested to permit an expansion of the parking area for the
Chino Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) general offices,
as well as for other future commercial uses. A neighborhood
service center is proposed on the northeast portion of the site.
The project boundary is described as follows: beginning with
the southeast 604 feet by 633 feet corner of Archibald Avenue
and Arrow Route, excluding the 204 foot by 332 foot corner lot
and the interior lot that fronts on Archibald, approximately
350 feet south of Arrow Route. The resulting irregular shaped
area is the subject site. The site is comprised of four (4)
parcels, all under CBMWD's ownership.
The pro fort site is vacant and zoned R -3 with the exception of
one parcel improvnd with CBMWD'S general offices. This portion
is located on Archibald, approximately 204 feet south of Arrow
Route. This parcel is presently zoned C -1.
Further review of. the zone change requires analysis of the
total 604 fool by 633 foot corner as a whole. It is defined
on the south by an elementary school, on the east_ by a single-
family subdivision and on the north and west by major arterials.
Tho corner is vacant with the exception of the CBt1WD's offices
and a building housing the Assistance Lenque of Upland. Both
uses have individual access drives on Archibald Avenue. There
is an interior street which enters on'Arrow Route as well as
into the. two residential streets of the adjoining subdivision.
A seventy (70) foot building setback on Archibald Avenue has
been established by the two improvements. As for on -site
parking, both uses have separate afeaS. It is Staff's opin-
ion that when the wren develops, whether commercial or residential,
it should be coordinated with the adjacent parcels.
To the south of CBMWD'S general offices on the interior lot
excluded from the site is the Assistance Leanne of Upland.
The Assistance Lcaque is a service organization which was
granted a site approval in ,August: 1763 to establish a community
girls club. The Asgist,anco i,caguc si.tc is piesontl,y zoned R -1
and is surrounded on the South, cast and north by the project
s to. it. is Staff's opinion that, should the requested zone
chanqu bo appi oved, it would be appropriate to include the
Assistance League property in the derision.
Staff. Analysis: (cont.)
In general, most of the commercial uses per;nitted in the c -1
zone district, if adequately buffered, would be compatible
with the Elementary School on the south. The situation is
somewhat different for the east portion of tho site, since
many of the permitted c -1 uses would be incompatible with
the adjacent single- family neighborhood. Further, the impact
of commercial activity will be greater on the adjacent homes
since there is common frontage. in Staff's opinion, minimal
traffic generating uses with appropriate buffering should be
the only type of commercial uses permitted on the eastern
portion of the site.
Findings as Rocommended by Staff:
Based on the analysis stated above, the following findings
are recommended:
I. The proposed zone district is consistant with the "Urban
Arca" designation of the General Plan as long as the
permitted commercial uses on the eastern portion of the
site is compatible with the adjacent single - family residen-
tial. noighborhoodt if the development of the entire corner
is coordinated; and if adequate buffering is installed.
2. The subject zone change appli.cat.i.on has not been filed
concurrently with the development proposal.
3. The site, incoordination with the'cntirc corner, is suitable
for many of the uses permitted in the C -1 zone district
in terms of access, size of parcel, density, relationship
to similar or related uses, and other considerations deemed
relevant.
4. The proposed change of district classification, modified
to exclude uses not compatible with single- family resi-
(1ences, is reasonnblo and proper at this time, and with
appropriate buffering and exclusion Of non- eompa tit) le uses,
it will. not advor.seiy affect adjoining properties as to
volue or proccdcnt and will not to detrimental to the area
or ad joininq pi'operlios.
5. 'rho w,,d for an o,pandcd p ❑rk ittr7 l,a as wolf as a proposed
neighborhood center has warranted this zone change.
G. Tho proposed zone change modified to limit the commorcial
uses on the oastcrn luvt.ion of the :jiff` to those usos that
do not generate excessive noise, and traffic and to include
appropriate buffering requirements, will be in the interest
of furtherance of public health, safety and general welfare.
Recommendation:
Based upon the stated findings and analysis, Staff recommends
APPROVAL of the C -1 -T Zone district on the subject site, in-
cluding the parcel housing the Assistance League of Upland.
Further, Staff recommends the following "T" standards:
A development plan to be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Director prior to any further development
of the site. Said plan shall incorporate design consider-
ations for the entire southeast 604 feet by 633 feet corner
of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Design considerations
shall include but not be limited to the location of drive-
ways, parking areas, sidewalks, walls, loading areas, land-
scaping, proposed signs, lighting fixtures, proposed struc-
tures and irrigation improvements.
2. The permitted uses on the easterly portion of the site
(parcels adjacent to the residential subdivision) shall
be limited to those C -1 zone district uses that will be,
in the opinion of the Planning Director, compatible with
single- family residential uses. Uses not permitted shall
include those uses that generate excessive noise and traffic
and are open during hours other than 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
3. Appropriate buffering and screening shall be installed on
the southern and eastern boundaries. Commercial uses
located on the eastern portion shall be aesthetically
compatible with single- family residences.
4. A masonry wall six (6) feet in height shall be installed
around east project boundary. Said wall will. be reduced
to fo,n- (4) feet in height within front setback areas.
all walls shall be designed and constructed to provide
visual and physical. relief along the wall face.
5. 'Chat all trash enclosures and loading areas be screened
from view on Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route.
6. That all buildings be setback a minimum of seventy (70)
feet: from the centerline of Archibald Avenue, further that
no buildings be constructed within these minimum setback areas.
.ni i 51 lci ,.I _.
Iistri'ct
:5;S Archibald Avenue
:uCamonga, CA 91730
lssistance League of Upland
1.0. Box 27
Ipland, CA 91786
209 - 041 -27
lariscal, Mario P. and Joaqu
')824 Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
208 - 311 -13
"riego, Julia :1.
1832 Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
208 - 311 -25
'Araber, Donald & Janice Y
)786 E. Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
203- 291 -02
'topp, James B. & Betty K.
773 Carnation
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
203 - 291 -06
Evans, James L., & Linda S
1816 Salina Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209 - 282 -15
Bible Missionary Church (licks, Fred D. & Laura B.
California - Arizona 9314 Arrow Highway
c/o Reverend J.E. Ray Cucamonga, CA 91730
1645 E. Yale Street
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006 208 -311 -1
Zahn, Ethel
c/o Hendrix, Clyde A & Lorraine
9850 E. Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
208 - 311 -26
Aleman, Porfirio & Gabriela
9840 Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
208 - 311 -17
Swanson, Carl M. & Eunice P
9760 Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730.
208-
Dumas, John D. Et. Al.
7135 Center Street
Highland, CA 92346
209 - 041 -21
Lund, Kermit R. & Iris N.
c/o Griggs, John H. & Linda L
9808 Salina Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209- 232 -16
Aleman, Parfirio & Gabriela
9840 Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
208- 311 -15
Hoffman, Robert, Jr.
510 Popyrus Drive
La Habra, CA 90631
208 - 291 -01
Allen, Robert H. & Leonard,
H. Harg
9710 Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Aguilar, Frederick T.&
Gwendolyn
9824 Salina Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209 -282-
Stoeppelmann, Robt. K. & Mat
9807 Salina Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209= 281 -01
Dickinson, Harvey L. & La Verne Bell, Regionald E. & Versel E. Alaniz, Fred S. & Alice M.
9815 Salina, Street 9105 Juniper Avenue 9320 Alpine Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730 Fontana, CA 92335 Cucamonga, CA 91730
209- 231 -02 209 - 041 -17 209- 283 -01
Camarena, Tom F. & Priscilla
)328 Alpine Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209- 233 -02
Camarena, Raul, Mary, Tom
9307 Alpine Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Naricis, George
9838 Alpine Street
Cucanonga, CA 91730
209- 283 -03
Hernandez., James J & Jennie
9815 Alpine Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
arisi, Daniel A.
9850 Alpine Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209 - 283 -04
Rogers, Rodney & Donna
9823 Alpine Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209 - 282 -01 1 209 - 282 -02 1 _. ___ 209- 282 -03
/o Stites Realty
!32;1:' Mounta i n Avenue
'lpJand, CA 91786
V 209 -282
;with, Ronnie R & Erica S.
7841 E. Alpine Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209 - 282 -05
!Iohn, Fred 0. 8 Marjorie L
1823 Salina Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209- 281 -03
t1
Southeast Investment Company
P.O. box 367
SouthGate, CA 90280
209 - 282 -12
Cotton, Ruben E.
9833 Salina Street
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209 - 281 -04
'.leffner, Edward V. L Lola M. Black -Swan Corp
1524 McDonald Road 1018 Moraga Drive
Fallbrook, CA 92028 Los Angeles, CA 90049
209 - 021 -20 209- 021 -30
Cohen, Carl G Frances R. Cohen, Carl 8 Frances R.
9350 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 419 9350 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 419
Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Beverly Hills, CA 90210
209- 021 -16 209- 021 -17
Stewart, Riehard S G Cheryl
9834 Salinas Street I,,,;v�
Cucamonga, CA 91730,
209 - 282 -13%
Kidder, Robert K L Mary D.
c/o Robert Hoffman, Jr. ;�
5.::.
510 Papyrus Drive
La Habra, CA 90631
i.
209- 291 -07
Heffner, Edward V. b Lola 14
1524 Mc Donald Road I
Fallbrook, CA 92028 PsNr
209 - 021 -18
Cucamonga, Elementary Schoi
c/o Principal Pete Carrasci
8677 Archibald Avenue
Cucamonga, CA 91730
209- 041 -01 8 13
1`�S`•
..4
t.
n 1p
M1.
!/r San Bernardino County - Emn,onmentai'� rovement Agency
L' ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVI• r
"� °� NOTICE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
TIM -% 1717' 711 "0T"TY r... T at r...r....,... 1, 1.7: ,,.
Reviewing Authority
Initial Study Data Review and Consultation Periotl t LL
EAD Log No, 7l.E -0'10 S Effective Data of this
Project Title and Description 7011E CTTATTGE, C•
^ontb 0.10 nf. Arr'rra T.o,ita
1111 E. Mill St., Bldg. 1, 2nd FI
San Bernardino, CA 92415
(714) 383 -1502
332 ft, east of Archibald
h- ^nor, rr--L ^.!.rTn of ,nrr:olba!'1 ACCm:^ rr,r '- .,1.•a.t ^].y 101 feet Pv1'001 04 h7
rt Applicant Ch!ro a,,.ri.n ^unir:!hsl, r, },.t ^. *, bi
Address RSi$ T•): c'L!bn).d Arr•nn^ . .
!'7l ^.1730
Conditions (lfAny)
Plans and specifications are available for public inspection in the office of the Environmental Analysis Division.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code, Sec. 21000, et seq) and 1
✓�", Environmental Administrative Guidelines for Local Entities, the County of San Bernardino has determined that the abuve•referena
project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Raisons to support this finding include the written Initial Study and deliberations of the San Bernardino County
Tctt
r T't-1 rrnri ^nt'T mna i � Cyr- ;'i.t e rn1 T
111gn•7 .tt, 7,M1)
This decision maybe appealed to the Board of Supervisors or Local Agency Formation Commission ILAFC), as appropriate, by a
person aggrieved, or by an officer, board, department, or bureau of the County. Any appeal shall be filed within fourteen (14) it
'ql after the rendition of this decision, or it shall be dismissed by the Board of Supervisors or LAFC. The Notice of Appeal shall be
,4ti Yrtiting and shall be filed in duplicate in the office of the Clark of the Board of Supervisors upon for" provided try same.
} i This project is now ready to proceed to the 11 n:1 P:Ynnrtl!.Pn (:O'l,f.y "Ln ?lle!. ti.4 Cerpmjstninll
for project approval.
Lpn4Nn �
1,
'r. EnLkoonsenfal Rariew ONker
Copy of this form filadeeth: Clerk of tMRaarCOl Supervisors
I Se,,ohn, of the planning Commission or LAFC
Erer romeentol AnNYSn 0MIlm
19,40111M
1e.140554r1
Dirrriev ion:
",to - APplirenr
01. - Clore or ewrd or LA
Omen - Sponsoring Courtly
Canary - EAD Propel File
Pine - EAD Rndieg PH@
DWaMrod- Cape
NOTICE of 1-11CARIN
PUIILIC HEARING HAS 13EEN SCHEDULED BEFORE 1rl1E Rld7CHO CUCAMONGA CITY
COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED APPLICATION:
+ FILE NO.: W97 -85
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from R -3 to C -1
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Archibald and Arrow Route,
Rancho Cucamonga
APPLICANT: Chino Basin Municipal Water District
PLACE OF HEARING; 9161 BASELINE AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730
DATL AND TIME OF HLARING: Wednesday, June 7, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
ANY PERSON AFFECTED BY THIS APPLICATION MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN SUPPORT.;
OR OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSAL AT THE 'TIME OF THE IIEARING.
c
A NPOATIVE DI.('LARATr0N HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR '11115 PROPOSED PROJECT WHICH
MEANS 'I'lIA'i' T'lli: CO!Gl'1'1' POUND 'I'IIA'f THE PROPOSIiD PROJECT 440ULD HAVE NOT POSSIBLE;
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENV1110NMENTAL EFFECTS. 'y
THE F;;JVII ?ONtdEN'fAL PiNUI NG ALONG {JITH Tlli:; PI?Ol'OSI:D PROJECT Af'PLICAI`TON MAY
BE VIEWN.D AT THE PUBLIC INFORMATION COUNTUR AT SAN NiCRNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTIIIiNT, 311.1 E. MILT, ST., BLDG. kl, SAN BP:RNARDINO, CA. 92415 k "}'
FROM 8:00 A.M. UNTIL 5:00 P.M.
RuosCion
1*c9;11*f ull the ,)hove` proccdur.es rhnuld he directed to the San Bernar
dino County Planning Department at (714)383 -1417 or (800)472 -5694, Ext. 141 ?A
o1y.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL
Y
rH t'
�J_ :>
BANKOFAMERICA
February 28, 1978 1� y-
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif,
:his will serve as notice and agreement that Bank of Arerica hT &SA
8700 Baseline, Alta Loma, a financial institutir�n subject to reg-
ulations by the State or Federal CoverrmLent, holds on deposit the
necessanf amount of $8,200.00, pledging these funds to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for payment of labor and materials on a project
of S E C Development (mown as Elinor Subdivision No. 77 -0559, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, according to that agreement
dated ,rune 7. 1978 , between City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Owners as above stated.
the Eight Thousand Two Hundred and no /100 ($8,200.00) will be dis-
bursed upon authorization and direction of a duly authorized represent-
ative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
This agreement shall expire either upon disbursement to the City or
upon acceptance by the City of that portion of the aforementioned
work secured by this instrument.
Very truly. yours,
�F4 f 'e'
F. Hentzschel
Manager
This agreement approved:` �
BY
Date .rti To
r-.
Cj.ty Counci lty of tancho ucam
C onga
`Date June 7, 1978
BANK OF AMEmOA NATIONAL TnIIIT AND SAVINGS Ai$nv AT In
r
NVIRONMENTAI IMPROVEMENT AGENCY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1111 East Mill Street, Bldg, 1 • San Bernardino. CA 92415 - 1714) 383.1417
December 29, 1977
Doug Hone
9407 Valley View
Alta Loma, Ca. 91701
Re: Minor subdivision No. 1,I77 -0559C
Dear Mr. Hone:
•
Cooniv o� $on Bernardino
....`e Kl—lb C.siit :iit4il
vo,: =i:at. your Minor subd.i.vzsion anpl'c:,l ion
to yon:: complcti.on oi: the rcy.:ir,,• r:: - ...
.•,_ rtto c;-, s(i shee. t(sI
-it', . i San ';arnardino County Code, Sect:i.r:, .
rr
o' j-, nnt spw:i. tied on the utt'rched shce`_(,•
. ('_) Dear af.L.et' the date of tit.ic IC21 or, ..
,,,,�,,v voi,.. An CXtensipn, of til'. ^_ VOII 1
i v, r. ,y i�n -antt.J c:,on wri Ltcn appli ratinr, to c',:' ..
not less than thirty (30) nays prior t.. r.
Tn:a.osed by unr Vinor subdivision apnl ica ticu cr.r.;t ::
or sold until tho r. quirr_-cnts
I rco
!,r-n co•x>i<a;:<: arrc: you application hir. been gi.vrn
,�rr;:::.vn l." •-ued ny the Planning Director.
Any a7ori.oprA Parson many, wi'�hi.n thirty (30) days cftcr rccoic-
of this notice (oi.reator :,pproval.), pursuant. to Tit],- 6, 5,
Chapter l., Soction 65.01? of the San Bernardino County Ccde,
in to:.. •_inc c.o cnc Cocrty Tl;irnin ^y 0.. ,_s =i nrf FOr. conciderat: e. -,
thereof.
Sincerrely,
ENVIRONMENTAL IA]PR07EM•ENT AGENCY
FLANtIING DEPARTMENT
John ^�rlvgzni.k
Design mevrew ection
i';est Valley Planning Team
J2: n4
yi9OU' noted a:oQ)( i,rn luwasrrvn
9091 11T ni„NlI ,.
.IAMISL MAVHLtO
cc: Co. Transportation (2)
Co. Flood Control
Foothill Fire District
Associated Engineers
316 East "I" Street
Ontario, Ca. 91764
Director Action 46 December 29, 1977 •1 M.S. ;k W77 -0559C
I Twenty -seven (27) foot grant of easement to the County of San Bernardino
2 required for Baseline Avenue to provide sixty (GO) foot half -width
aright -of -way as shown on Minor Subdivision Plat map.
4
s Seven (7) foot grant of easement to the County of San Bernardino re-
b quired for Archibald Avenue to provide fifty -two (52) foot half -width
fright -of -way as shown on Minor Subdivision Plat map.
R
Q Paving, curbs, gutters and sidewalks shall be installed on Baseline
10 and Archibald Avenues for proposed parcel one (1) only. Plans for
11 all .improvements must be approved by the San Bernardino County Road
12 Department prior to installation of said improvements. A cash deposit
13 or bond may be placed with the County Road Department to fulfill
14 this requirement.
I5
16 Applicant shall obtain and forward to this office a letter from the
17 serving water agency certifying that capacity for this project has
1N been reserved for a minimum period of one (1) year.
19
20 The following are Flood Control District REQUIREMENTS;
,1
22 (1) A low block wall shall be provided around the return at Baseline
23 and Archibald Avenues to preclude flows from jumping the curb
24 and entering the site.
25
26 (2) Adequate rolls shall be provided at the entrances to the site
27 to preclude Baseline and Archibald Avenue flows from entering
29 the site.
+9
10 The Parcel Map (survey) requirement has been waived (see resolution
71 on Minor Subdivision Plat map).
)1 Parcels shall be conveyed using a fractional description, or in
•34 a manner as to prevent gaps and overlaps of property lines.
36 The following are Flood Control District RECOMMENDATIONS:
V
is (1) Archibald Avenue shall be designed as a water- carrying street.
19
40 (2) The westerly portion of the site adjacent to Archibald Avenue
41 shall be adequately elevated above the top of curb or a concrete
42 block wall provided to preclude Archibald Avenue flows from
q3 entering the site.
44
45 (3) Adequate provisions shall be made along Baseline to preclude
46
accumulated drainage flows from entering the site. Road
47 7
48 improvements on Baseline may provide the necessary protection.
49 (4) Adequate provisions shall be made for the handling of onsite
So drainage flows and dewatering the site in a manner which will
51
52 not adversely affect adjacent property.
57
54 (5) Grating and improvement plans shall be submitted to this
55 office for review.
56
Page 2 of 2
Director Action December 29, 1977 • M.S, k !177 -0559C
(Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Foothill Fire District.
3This action is subject to appeal to the County Planning Commission
4Subcommittee for a period of thirty (30) calendar days from the
Sdate of this notice. The appeal must be made in writing on forms
6available from this office.
7
81f there are any questions regarding the above, please feel free
,)to contact this office at 714/383 -3691.
10
12
13
14
15
16
18
In
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2q
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
4.1
44
45
46
47
48
4q
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
0
RECORDING REDDEI D OY
WHO ale AD" MAIL TO
sh.
Sarawak
Adall
CIO Or
SYb
0
(SPACIc ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
GENERAL
Know All Men by These Presents: That I, _ . ANDREW G
the undersigned (jointly and severalty, if mare than one) hereby make, cnnstltule and appoint _ DOl1GLAS 7 —H61' E
my true and lawful Attorney for me and in my name. place and stead and for my use and benefit
(a) To ark, demand, sue far, recover called and re,,rm, ,in and every sum of money, debt, recount legacy, bequest, Interest dividend,
emrulry and d.mnnd (whuh now I, or herealler Than becoms tile, awing or ;,IhOIr) helnarmR to Or elalmed by cat, and To arse end lake any
lama! means Im the ash., in .... I by legal forest or otherwue, and to ester t and deliver a satiVacbon or release therefor, together wdb the
tight end power To camfomise or compound any exits or demand;
(b) To eeemiw any or all of the following powers as to well property. any interest therein and /or any building thereon To milled for,
Purchase, res +•ve and take Pat s... ion thereof and of evidence Of fide thoeb; to lease the same far any term or purpose. Including leases far
buemrs, residence and it and or mineral development', to sell. chan s. Plant or coney Me same with ar without warranty; end Io mart ater,
Irantrer in I-M or otherwise encumber or hypatberate The same to shore payment of A neridoWe or non negotiable note or performance of any
oriental or ariftmont;
(O To nn•c,a any or all M the fio?lm inr ones,, as to aq h-J, of n ^.'canal prn't.'y and ¢oafs, wares and merchandise ,hoses in Idiom
and other palmrsy in p'nsrtaian or in action' Tn farther 'or. thy . nf'I n ^hanye translnt and is any legal manner deal in ,.id wilt the time; and
to moolaee, namh. in " •r. or ru mwrae en,amtir at hoput ease tic same to secure payment of A negotiable or non negotiablt note of
p ffolmi n'c at ary br,.[ rr or agreni
(d) To borrow money >ad to n,,,ntF and Orel;... nape :iahlt or non rnrntiable thrift lbefolof with or without secarita and to loan money and
recoee firnbaAle or non reatlahle notes It ... !a, FTh such severity as he shall deem proper;
(e) To frst, a pod s men ont and laminate any I' It and In instruct and advise the trustee of any trust wherein' am or may be taster
m bmFi rn, In reprm...I and vale ruck r ark oeMs. ac ✓rat aa,l bP Or!b any dividend, disTrlbulion or honor, fain in any corporate
ImaecmP r nrafun In ...I. Imo dapc, I... dalcan or nlhrr act on xnf the eat^neian. compromise. cocoa,..... Adlustment enforcement
an fe er'nnrlr •early or m an• ,,!a, wdh nlhr's of ary cars stock, toad, note, debenture Or other security; to compound, compromise,
ad `s: v,TV, a ^d lofty any nmaalmrn . securerl or unserred, nwmg by or to are and to Rove or accept any property and.'or money whaler at
not tonal in air 'es, m vaL¢than the an•rvmt owing m pay'renL xenrornnv ar to :nradloo thereof;
(n To transact bagnrts of any lord a r'nw sad a m, art and deed to Oar. eaecvte Rknovirede, and deliver awy deed, fen., sai
was^ ..... in, ,"mine m&= I. ..... —T. mr,T ... o NM of last. assignment of modaaR Or of the beneficial Interest under
drift a' ` -N nvronn , n ,vat nr acv c1, aie, wJ rud.,,t n m w ever of priority, hypOthemfirm b.HOmry, charter party, bill of lading bill
a' Ise h'! Iw'i oar^ we ...... .ag i,ir - or non r ^mints I, 'P! efforts of dept full or partial redo.. R selisraetion of morigag" Iudg
re" all a ".' t^fi •^ nett for pa" 11 an fall rea ^+rYan[e III feed rat f. l a ^d ...A olber instruments in tilting of any kind or class R may be
,. scary 17 1111w a the prom.".
Giii iIQ and GT2DtIDP nrto ray to d Attorcay h'i rower and Ddnority, to do and perform all and every ad and thing wbatioever rpubRa,
ea•stnv nl "It" ^.a In b. don. m Iii+ chant to prom Fi al ful:y In all intents and purposes as I might or could do if personally present,
hereby .Y'p rap r" ' "d my said Alcamo +shall law'u °y an or "11.to be done by awl", of these presents The powers and authority hereby con.
I ArT ,v tl.,' bo apamable In all real and personal prop*" o, interests therein now owned or hereafter acquired by me and
"n. RY se '1 W n-ny is •nnnwnnel Turnery m doetmim in his solo dish ,! on The Limn when, purpn,e for and manner in which any power herein
r oft and the ,trd!mns erovrs'nns and covenants of any instrument or document which may be emorted by
m O °/ n : to no nr d srnv Turn N coal nu Oriental property, my tald Attorney shall have exclusive power to fm the terms
t' n
r n' Ind 1't and m prnprtly. and rl on Opoll with or without s<cun(y.
The urnnn :Ord rl a marred woman, h ... by further authnntes and empowers my said Attorney, as my duly autharleed anent, to 101, In my
b.•e" rn v infra -ut b, which any con"unily teal property or any interest Therein, now owned of hereafter ncqubed by my
Inn :. n ^d •^, r . rr n' r:. is laid. 'cased, rnrumbered, or conveyed
w'n ^• t n ' ^• .).urge Ire ..... ran- gender includes the feminine and 'a, neuter, and the singular number includes the paid,
WITNESS my hind this 2nd day of__ flay, 178
g �
ANDREW G. DAVIS
State of California, )
I'_ } Ss
County ol. rye r'.Va -ta.. Trl.._ru 1
On - Sari u_,.q_Z�i. s_,.. SL7.5 _I__ before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for mid
State. personally appeared.__ . _ _ � Lf. �\k ` tti (k. (. � a
known to me to bathe person--whose name_,.._ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that!
executed the same.
(Seal) -- :`,Wotan Public in end for Hard
_. - - ---
Witness my hand and official sep,i, „ „•,,,,,,
Sitle .
lti j. i' r
r c 1 %, 1, rna
''T •Y 5i,4 f.i.i`1.', li, %) C "I'll, '
My Commms.00 Fepoes Nn, 14. 1981 _
POWER OF ATTORNEY -GEN"A
woe em Ft.. e uoo -Rev I.-y. •.,O "` „,I "�•r'" Ir , art "rh�� In rAp fine rota ad Ix o,r Ilan. .ad u. fill In All VMTO,
r,nmC'a no a rvyo -0 1- n ,Loin 11, 1 m,. rhmnl for vier yens t
Applicant: Douglas Hone P.C. Hearing
7333 Hellman Ave. Date: 5/10/78
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Index: W93 -73
Panel: 4812 -1
Proposal: Zone change from R -1 to A -P
Location: Southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attached are the Planning Commission minutes, staff report, maps,
notice of hearing, mailing list and Notice of Determination.
No "T" Standards required
No withhold required
Recommendation:
1. Planning Commission recommends that the zone change to AP
he approved.
2. Adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice
of Determination.
/ e
04TER- OFFICE
MEOO
7
DATE
May 22, 1978
1 u. sur.wi�'o J
FROM
Douglas Payne, Associate Planner PHONE Ext. 3685
West Valley Planning
TO
Lauren Wasserman, cc:
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager
City Council
City Clerk
SUBJECT
Zone Change request for June 7, 1978
City Council Hearing
(Routine)
Applicant: Douglas Hone P.C. Hearing
7333 Hellman Ave. Date: 5/10/78
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Index: W93 -73
Panel: 4812 -1
Proposal: Zone change from R -1 to A -P
Location: Southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attached are the Planning Commission minutes, staff report, maps,
notice of hearing, mailing list and Notice of Determination.
No "T" Standards required
No withhold required
Recommendation:
1. Planning Commission recommends that the zone change to AP
he approved.
2. Adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice
of Determination.
/ e
r +...CITY COUNCIL HEARIN TE: May 10, 1978
v
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL
WGENDA ITEM NO.
ROUTINE ITEM
NON - ROUTINE ITEM
TIME OF ITEM
AREA: Rancho Cucamonga
FILE /INDEX NO: Zone Change Index No. W93 -73
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from R -1 to AP '
LOCATION: SE corner of Baseline Rd. and Hellman Ave.
APPLICANT: Douglas Hone
ENGINEER /ARCHITECT:
26 PUBLIC UJUUNG NOTICES SIN'T ON 4 -26 -78
REPORT' PREPARED BY: Douglas Payne
FIELD INSPECTION TEAM: DATE OF INSPETTICN:
PARCEL SIZE: 2,3 acres
EXISTING LAID USE: one residence and vacant land
EXISTING ZONING: R -1
SURROUNDING LAND USE AW ZW124G
NORTH: Commercial and Warehousing
Zoned AP and M -1
EAST: Railroad and Residential
Zoned R -1
SCUTH: Railroad and Residential
Zoned R -1
WEST: Residential and Vacant
Zone R -1
GENERAL PLAN AND DESIGNATION:
None
THE PLANNING C014MISSION ON APRIL 26, 1978 DETERMINED
THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD F;AVEA [6N`-_9IGN EFFECT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
City Sphere of Influence:
Water Service:
Sewer Service:
STAFF RMn'W IDATICN:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Staff Analysis:
The applicant is requesting a zone change from R -1 to AP on
the triangular shaped parcel located on the southeast corner
of Baseline and Hillman. According to the applicant, he would
like to develop the site with an office complex.
As mentioned, the site is triangular in shape. On the north
and east, it fronts onto two arterial highways. Baseline
on the north, a proposed divided major, and Hellman on the
east, a proposed secondary highway. Along the remaining side
of the site is the Southern Pacific Railroad lines. The loca-
tion of the site is in an area that is transitioning into com-
mercial uses. To the north are new commercial and light ware-
housing operations. Approximately 500 feet to the west is the
library and Park and Recreation Building. On the northwest
is a church.
The site is appropriate for both commercial or residential use.
Should commercial uses be permitted on the site, the residential
uses to the east would be buffered by the railroad line that
defines the easterly side of the project.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Since the area is developing with commercial uses, there is
reasonable probability that the AP zone district will be
consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered.
2. There is little or no probability of substaintial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan if
the AP zone district is ultimately inconsistent with the
general plan.
3. No development plan has been filed concurrently with this
zone change request.
4. The zone change will be in the interest of furtherance of
public health, safety and general welfare.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that the
AP zone change be approved.
NOTICE HEARING
A PUBLIC BEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED BEFORE THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY
COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED APPLICATION:
FILE NO,: W93 -73
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from R -1 to AP or such other zone district
as may be determined at the public hearing.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman, Rancho Cucamonga
Portion of the NE4 of Section 3, T1S - R7W, SBB &M.
APPLICANT: Douglas and Kathleen Hone
PLACE OF IIEARLNG: 9161. BASELINE AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730
DA'L'E AND TIME OF HEARING: Wednesday, JUNE 7, 1.978 at 7:00 P.M.
ANY I'I:IiSON AFFIV'171:1) 13Y '1'1HS APPLICATION MAN' APPEAR AND BE 11EARD IN SUPPORT
Olt OPPOSITION TO '1112 PROPOSAL AT THE TIME OF THE BEARING.
A NNGAT.TVIi DECLARATION HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR 'I'11IS PROPOSED PROJECT WHTC11
MEANS THAT THE t'OU:; TY FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD HAVE NOT POSSIBLE
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.
THE PINVIRONME; ;TAT, FINDING ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED PROTECT APPLTCATION MAY
BI: VICWISU AT 'THT: PUBLIC INFORMATION COUNTER AT SAN, BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING
DEPAR'TMI:NT, 1111. I:. MILI, ST., BLDG. i)1, SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92415
FROM 8:00 A.M. UG'TIL 5:00 P.DI. FROM MAY 22, 1978 TO JUNE 6, 1978.
question rogarding Lho ,Ihoee procedures shonlrl be directed to tho San Bernar-
dino Coun Ly Planning Department at (714)383 -141.7 or (800)472 -6694, Est. 1417
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL
Duct cols !:. Rvlm Josvpf, A'niteir .., lrlm '!I' f,oho
7333 !ft evoa /wci,m• c /•' Tiumn; !4n Ills cin 1. +'r, A(r ,,n::dct
RanJw Otca;miga, ia. 9113C 43 ^I 1'r.;,'pvn '.r,r 9:19 Coast GivJ
YOY- •117 -14 Rancho Cucanwi!;tl" Ca. 91730 Lo. Joii'a, Ca. 9£037
208 - 433 -74 202 -J9i f+
Richatd S. Genovese
18821: Gw :,Jutven
Cnvul,t, Cc. 917 °.2
208- W- 0.1
John Stclomt
'734: Lail
Rauclto Cucetiti a, Cn
201- 433 -1i
Autllnf ii• RC %tCt lii
•111.1 .VCn; a• >t selch, G:. 92(C^
20'-011 -13
1o1111 P. leay.oma;ift
't<nac,', D. CofCi.ng3
lh,mr+;as R. Ihva
1380 (Tula Avrnuo.
r.Ja 0nlnt GeG7tat dt
'7407 veirUff vice'
Ranchir Cucla:vnpa, CL.
91730.
7r %i„ Ltyfnn !
Ra;cho Cucaronga, Ca. 91701
208- 4 >3 -05
I'o.ncho Cucamonga, Caf,f ,n ,ntlt 97 f30
202- 091 -17
i 05- •133 -1 /,
Lottic A. I \t:...t ci:
nCi n•. c. 1!'D"•Jdlf �
!!;:!.ir
93.71 1''15m9 SI'c,';
IC:t.
i'Ifii i.rr;lalt .5craln;
125: flci in;.t•: 'In:•n: q
Rrmclu Cu(!ajm- la,
917:.0
r i
> itmuaw ('ucarnuiyia, Ca. 717]0
Aifa G "•:a, ca. iH;ci
2U..• •133 -1i I
202- 091 -18
YOd- + v8
1
i
rC lq'Jl yll 11. TO!..:
!. 1 ^ticlt. L. i!a'iUJ tv.
I`:; C.i Ci c'-C(•It,(, Rtv tL'.: II
93;q Pe:!''' tt:'eJ
'11 Lontlm I
r!, A5!fi L 1 ('Yn: ^l. Oliwll
lfmn•i;, iu ^rn:•uy,l, ..
917'x01
•.':vu ;hn cite'l110nrya, Ca. 1i ", "s0 �
P.O 1C•x 3Vi;
+S
i
At'fa i,i .n.t ('•:ii< '717ul
208- , -tl'
� 208 - 433 -15 �
2J= �2J' -0�•
ilic.
9317 i' °'!•1 ". .. !' !'('1
47;?
� 1'.11. (i!lY 1147
c1u rAI (4 L;'In,l Cnren4 ('flll1Cll
Kandlr .':: c:m: a; ✓, C..,
'
^,1730
(mtitrr.l.u, Ca. '77762
A'cl 91701
�
At'.i,t Lrr::n, ('n t.i.j.
20k- �i33-li)
a '•'Ot,- ,133 -i9 4
?01- 2,!' -P7
li'. I' ... I:f is •.1
1.— _�:It: ':/ f'. 6.n1(i.li: f:, :. i
I3; Ii, 1 't .,. !.
.'I J" •!•'uli $I Ri:v.i: I
.. ,
:'2 i:, L.
9r,.•!
.J
�'.u,::h., rnl,rnnnv:;.c, r... 917s0 i
A.
('h'il Sir!nidl . 11195x11'.
.�.
..___..� -_•_.. -.... � ._i
:iiamr N• Gll l'. Ilr
AI'.:n Ix ;.t :u sr:, Ilt; ..
9,111 Pe.;7: "t : "`eri
1
i !ldLnl)f;m 57.ecet (
rill LID: u: R. (4.; YI: S,nI
Nanchr Cuctmr,'n,jn„ :I,.
'!I'IJ.
ilcuan' Cmallion!ta, ("a 91130 t
101 1-1 f'nwris
f
(t'hiiili Pit. 90,,;) 1
28 - 151 -i2
0
7 !0- ,i:i5 -71
f
2('ll 11 -Io2
Ila!rnr 7. f!Irrl +sxu
Grifnl; ('.f, llal'Jfna Pvl"p•anq j
:;ubaa•in,,5l:dr. n' G.
91181 1'.:):11:•1 tib:rrR
„ufnt;n, 7. ('.i m•E.t
c/:, :i ",f Ulf ilsCwX (MI.J.
:'02- fi'71 -37 i
to in':.:',', (•:. 7176.1
7•!S0 II¢1'I'nrmt •lvcnul'
0 0
INTER- OFFICE MEMO ,r
7G<a.xr'v�i
x ecvv�nxin8 �
DATE May 10, 1978 f
FROM Douglas Payne, Associate Planner, Ext. 3685 Yr
West Valley Planning /
TO Lauren Wasserman, cc: City Council
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager City Clerk
SUBJECT Zone Change Request for June 7, 1978 (Routine)
City Ccuruail Hearing
Applicant: Donovan Schowalter P.C. Hearing
8297 Baker Avenue Date: 4 -26 -78
Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Index: W85 -82
Panel: 4811 -4
Proposal: Zone Change from A -1 to R -3
Location: Southeast corner of Foothill and Baker Avenue,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attached are the Planning Commission minutes, staff report, maps,
notice of hearing, mailing list and Notice of Determination.
No "T" Standards required
Withhold required
Recommendation:
1. Planning Commission recommends that zone change 3000 R -3 be
adopted, but wi;:hhold the enabling ordinance for one (1) year
for the submission and approval of a location and development
plan and construction diligently pursued to completion.
2. Adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice
of Determination.
(a D
12 .0
CITY COUNCIL IIEARI0DATE: April 12, 1978
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM NO.__2__
ROUTINE ITEM
NON - ROUTINE ITEM
TIME OF ITEM
AREA: West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
FIIE /I11DFX NO: Zone Change W85 -82
PROPOSAL: Zone Changr from A -1 to R -3
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Foothill & Baker
APPLICPNr: Donovan Schowalter
FNGINEIM/AIK7N=T :
11 PUBLIC IZMUNG NOTICES SENT ON 3 -30 -78
Rf7)ORr PREPARED BY: Doug Payne
FIELD INSPECTION MV4: DATE OF INSPECTIOH:
PARCEL SIZE: 7.2 acres
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant and residential
F`CISTTNG ZONING: A -1
v SWU WNJING LAND USE AND ZONING
NOPril: Vacant
Zoned R -1
EAST: Mobilehome Park
Zoned R -3
SOU1'N: Mobilehome Park
Zoned R -3
W'F5T: Vacant
Zoned A -1
GFI,HWI PLAN AND DESIGNATION:
Valley Portion County General Plan / Urban Areas Z
T11E ENVIRONMENTAL REVTEW COMMITTEE ON 2 -7 -78 DETERMINED
TIIAT THIS PROJECT WOULD RAVI AEON- SIGNIF2L'AA1`F;Ff EC'r ON THE
ENVIRONMENT. -
Water
Sc or
STAFF IUra- VINDATICNJ:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
0 0
Staff Analysis:
Requested is a zone change to the R -3 (multiple - residential)
district on the 7.2 acre site located on the southeast cor-
ner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue. The applicant
is requesting the R -3 district to permit the development of
an apartment complex. It should be noted that prior to con-
struction, the applicant will be required to submit a Location
and Development Plan for approval. To date, this has not been
done.
The proposal as submitted would create a 180 foot wide by
610 foot long strip of A -1 zoned property surrounded on
the north, east and south by R -3 property. Should the request
be approved, it would be appropriate to change the zone dis-
trict of the entire block of A -1 zoned property located on
the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue.
The entire block is under one ownership.
It is possible that the R -3 zone district will be consistent
with the General Plan now being prepared. The request multiple -
residential zone would be compatible with surrounding land
uses. The site is located adjacent to mobilehome park on
the east and is approximately 180 feet north of another.
The site fronts on'both Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.
Access from Foothill Boulevard will be most likely be pro-
hibited since it is designated as a divided major highway.
Baker, on the other hand, is a local road with an ultimate
right -of -way width of sixty feet. Presently, Baker accepts
traffic from the mobilehome park south of the site as well
as many residential subdivisions south of Arrow Route. Prior
to any decision on developments in this area, the city may
desire to re- examine the carrying capacity of.Baker Avenue.
The appropriate form to re- examine Baker Avenue would be through
the General Plan.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
Due to the existing mobilehome parks in the area, there
is reasonable probability that the R -3 zone district
will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being
considered.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan
if the R -3 zone district is ultimately inconsistent with
the General Plan.
i r
Findings:
No development plan has been submitted concurrently with
this zone change request.
4. The zone change will be in the interest of furtherance of
public health, safety and general welfare.
Prior to any land use decision for property fronting on
Baker Avenue, the ultimate carrying capacity of said
road should re- examined.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that
the item be continued until the General Plan is adopted.
However, should the Commission wish to approve the request,
Staff would recommend that their decision include the A -1
zoned strip of property to the south of the site.
NOTICE `� HEARING
is
A PUBLIC NEAP.INI3 HAS RE IiN SCHEDULED BEFORI? THE RANCIIO CUCAMONGA CITY
COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE FOLLO['IING DESCRIBED APPLICATION:
FILL' NO.: W85 -82
PROPOSAL: 7onc change from A -1 to R -3 or such other zone district
as may be determined at the public hearing.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue,
Rancho Cucamonga, portion of the NE; of Section 9, T -1 -S -
R -7 -W, SBB&M.
APPLICANT: Donovan Schowalter
PLACE OF HEARING: ()1(I BASELINE AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730
DATE AND TIME Oi' III:ARI:IG: Wednesday, June 7, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
ANY I`i:12;:0 >; rli'i'i:CTNU B'L ']TITS APPLICATION :DAY ,1PPI:AR AND RE HEARD IN SUPPORT
OR OPPOSITION TO 'TIIE PiOPOSAL AT THE 'DIME 01' THE HBA:+ ING.
A NEGATIVE Ill': "LAAiv'I'IIPI HAS BI:!;;; 1C:.; Uc,U FOii , w)POSRD PRU,?h:CT UUJC11
MEATS VIXT TIH: I`II i:iTY FOUND TI'.AT TIIE PROPOSED PROJI,.CP WOULD HAVE NOT POSSIBLE
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.
THE P:I::'I RO;P,IP;I:'I A1, VTNIJlNti ALONG Y7I'CI( THE PINPOSICD PROJECT APPLICATION mAY
BE VID:PfISD AT '['III] PEULI'C 11;F011MATION COUN'T¢R AT SAL': I:RRNARDINO COUNTY PI,AENING
DIU'ART:![1:;'1', 11.11 E. Fli 1.1. SP., BLDG. ', SAN Rl; i'.::AI2U1 N0, CA. 9241.5
FROM 8:00 A.M. U:iTll, 5:00 P.M. FROM MAY 22, 1978 TO JUNE 6, 1978.
OuorlLion r„r1.n ,lint t.h'. nbncn nrocndurn:; :;houlrl he ciir,•cted to !hl San Bernar-
dino County Planning Ucpartment at (714)383 - 1.11.7 or (800)472 -5694, E:a. 1417
RANCHO CUCA;I0Nc;A CITY COUXIL
rx
tfam Corp. ;,L Al.
!"dward .:sscn, �t Al
-camure \i 1141
i't. 1. T;Qx ,
J05 : c, wlia
--incolm, 956-;"
ttariol Ca. 9176:!
207-101-33
,)7-201-29
60wncy, hie.
Leonard Evelyn
0. 7,1ox 0
,.ar rave Et Al
Mario, 01761
517 1,7cst " St.
)7-201-33
1
untalio, Calif. 911762
207-101-37
"Ovilcv, inc.
C. 'ox 6':
�itario, ,ajir. 91.7b1
)7-201-3u'
onova n i . - i,oro L 'y t_
sc',;Owa 1.1-cr
297 7akcr Avc.
!camon;:,a, Calif. 91,730
)7- 201 -41, 42, 43 I
Alvin ;:opc usser,
El 1,1
;5 ,!. 21 =L
nlan(I, rl IF.
o 10aQS7 "LL".
:WPOIfL ..,L.
W-1 9 1 -39
07-191-40
OrL
:'rwlcjs. 1 t .1.
1753 � oot'i
911,
07-101-1"17
300 TooL:illl Jvd.
^cawor{;n, 71.1130
07-101-31.
). !T:cspLl
nark), 91M�
San Boma: :*only Envne.unen mprTement Agency 1111 E. "dill St., Bld i. 1, 2nd Floor
ENVIRON hIAL ANALYSIS DI( - '- 3e,ondin*, CA 92415
.'..I
) 3831532
NOTICE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Rm•rcwelg Au:honty
Initial Study Date —Review and Corsultatlon Period
EAD Log No. _ /� 'rr Effective Date of this Determination
.... .., -. _ , r.._ ....
Protect Title and ❑escrip;lon '�3' TO
( ".2 n
Plans ai:d sped hcallnns are ay.dable for public inspection in the office of the Environmental Analysis Division.
Pursuant to the n,v,,,o:,s of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 Willi lc Resources Corte, Sec. 21000, er eeq) and the
Enwronmental Adrni nruahvr Guhlrlmes for Local Entities, the County of San Bnrnardno hi.s determined that the abovere le minced
project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding include the wrulim Initial Study and deliberations of lie San Bernardino County
This du,;. ,mn may bn apnmiL;d to the Board of Sunervisors or Local Agency F*rm.)uou Commission (LAM, as appml lo, by any
person aggrieve(, or by an 010rm, board de pa,lmc n t, or bureau of the County. Any appeal shall he filed within Iel,rleen 1141 days
after the renddiou of this ties reon, or it shall be disndssrd by the Board of Supetvrson or LAFC. The Notice of Appeal shall be in
visiting and shall be filed in duplxwe in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors upon forms provided by same.
This pm,ecl is now ready to proceed In the
for project approval.
— --- Tatynam,e
l.nvirnrimenr.rl Rrvmw Oflae
Can, of lhrs from Lied with Clerk of the Sninl of SUPelleers
tinnmr ary hl me Pi u lean Germ..ssmn o, LAIC
Eevimnmenul A,n,oui Dee,
IPAll 411 1
., .. '. 1Ll: !''Yr.`f• ^.1: L-L'r rlr 71 N'..
^,fl %.Vii T,LiR:
n LC r.
n *nmono
R'hne- A,,A o f
flue C'rr (l oan/ m L AFC
G,rnn -.Span Mnnq County Asi
Canary ' CAD P-,ll File
Pmk CA Reab ne File
GmrlemaE - Copy
INTER- OFFICE MEMO
DATE May 22, 1978 ( u "en noi�o
FROM Douglas Payne, Associate Planr'wr, Ext. 3685 '� '•'
West Valley Planning
TO Lauren Wasserman, cc; City Council
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager City Clerk
SUBJECT 'Lone Change request for June 7, 1978
City Council Bearing (Routine)
Applicant: James Van Antwerp P.C. Hearing
5820 N. Hellman Date: 5/10/78
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Index: W94 -72
Panel: 4832 -11
Proposal: Zone Change from R -3 to AP
Location: Northwest corner of Baseline and Amethyst St.,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attached are the Planning commission minutes, staff report, maps,
notice of hearing, mailing list and Notice of Determination.
:70 "T" Standards required
No withhold required
Recommendation:
1. Planning Commission recommends that the zone change to AP
be approved.
2. Adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a Notice
of Determination.
1w
X� .
(, E
CITY COUNCIL REARIN *ATE: May 10, 1978
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL
WGENDA ITEM NO. Z
ROUTINE ITEM
NON - ROUTINE ITEM
TIME OF ITEM
AREA: Rancho Cucamonga
FILE /MI EX NO: Zone change Index ► W94 -72
PROPOSAL: Change zone classification from R -3 to AP
LCGITICN: Northwest corner of Baseline and Amethyst Street
APPLICANT : James A. Van Antwerp
ENGTNEER/ARCHITECT:
26 PUBLIC FARING NOTICES SENT ON April 26, 1978
REPORT PREPARED BY: John Perevuzni)F-
FIEID INlSPWTICN TEAM: DATE OF INSPECTION:
PARCEL SIZE: .37 acres
ERISTING ELAND USE; Undeveloped, vineyard
LYISTING ZONING: R -3
SURROUNDING LAND USE ACID ZONING
NORTH; Residential
Zoned R -3
EAST: Veterinary office 6 residential
Zoned C -2 -T and R -3
SOUTH: Residential
Zoned R -1
WEST: 7 -11 Store
Zoned M -1
G04EPAL PLW AND DESIGNATION:
None
THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON APRIL 26, 1978 DETERMINED
THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD RAVE A NON- SIGIg'ICANT EFFECT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
City Sphere of
Water Service
Sewer Service
V STAFF RECGMENDATION: Approval
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
* •
Staff Analysis:
The applicant is requesting a zone change from R -3, multiple -
family residential to AP, administrative and professional dis-
trict. Applicant states that he wishes to construct a cement
block office building with slump stone facing. The adminis-
trative and professional office district, AP, is designed to
provide areas where these type of offices may be located with
• functional and related group of uses. It is also useful as
• buffer district between highways and adjacent residential
uses.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Since the area has developed with commercial uses across the
street to the east, there is reasonable probability that the
AP zone district will be consistent with the General Plan
proposal being considered.
2. There is little or no probability of substaintial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan if
the AP zone district is ultimately inconsistent with the
general plan.
3. No development plan has been filed concurrently with this
zone change request, although one submitted for information
only.
4. The zone change will be in the interest of furtherance of
public health, safety and general welfare by providing buf-
fer between Baseline and residential uses to the north of
subject site.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that the
AP zone change be approved.
A PU13T,TC HEARIN(! !!AS BEEN SCIIEDULED BEFORE MIF RANC110 CUCAMONGA CITY
COUNCXL TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DLSCRIB)"D APPLICATION:
FILL NO.: W94-72
PROPOSAL: Zone change from R-3 to AP or such other zone district
as may be determined at the public hearing.
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Baseline and Amethyst Streets, Rancho Cucamonga,
Portion of the S", of Section 34, TIN - R7W, SBB&M.
API'LiCANI': James VanAntwerp
PLACE OF HEARING: 'iICl [�ASETJNF AVENUI:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 9.1730
DATE AND T111;I � Li" 1jiiAjn:;G: Wednesday, JUNE 7, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
AN", AFF':CV:D 15", '1111S APPLICATI( 'Zi t!Ai APPI:A!t 21* HEARD IN SUVPURT
Oil OPPOSITION :1'0 THE PROPOSAL AT THE TIME 01' THE HEARING.
A PE(';W 11ATTI1, H7" B[11;:; ISSUED FOIE ,[,Hl:; 11110IIOSED PROJP ' ("T WHICH
,',11',V;S THAT Til!� (:�)l :;",Y VOU;Ir) THAT THE' PROPOSED PROJECT V.'OLILD HAVE NOT POSSIBLE
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSI; J!NVIRONMCNTAL EFFj-"CTS.
THE, AT.ONC; WITH TH:� PROP091;!) Plt�),.T!:CT ION MAY
131; VH1WIN) AT COUNTER AT 13j:R'NARDiNo (-'01;:;TY PLANNING
DEPARTNF:�';', I lil E. ST., BiA)G. M1, SAN 111:RNAPDJNO, CA. 97.415
PROM 8:00 A.t!. I�NTJT, 5:00 P.M. FROM MAY 22, 1978 TO JUNE 6, 1978.
qu,s Li nn roglr(tillq t'll• thnve to lh,• Son Buillar-
di no Co'UnLy Planning Department at (71.4)383 - .1,117 or (800) 472-5694, EEL. 1417
RANCHO CUCAV10,NGA CITY COUNCIL
obert 'dan�a Lamb
Chock a Lilr '!aPers; :_. !; ;.
Hns:xihild T. Logan
%250 Amethyst
7235 Ameth': -
;: Kinnison
Al to Loma, CA 91701
Alta Loma, .. 91701
664 W. Granada Co °)nt
202- 091 -07
202- 161 -01
Ontario, CA 91762
202- 161 -20
i eland °.; Julia Scheu
Rilla W. Roberds
Charles W. Wood
P. 0. "ax 250
7201 Amethyst
7314 Layton 3t.
;eland, CA c1?%�O
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Cucamonga, CA 91730
- '02-091-010
202- 161 -02
209 - 431 -04
:tch Company, Inc.
Wayne &. Irma Dennis
?oyd & i.etha Davies
12x 308
231 So. Euclid Aye.
7324 Layton
llta Loma, CA 91701
Upland, CA 91786
Cucamonga, CA 91730
?02- 091 -09
202 - 161 -09
208 - 431 -05
.chn s. Vart,orie "cCaha et a.
•;ia,yne ?z Nancy ?rindley
James .: Vivian Henson
Mark Alexa nder
;;; A. L. Animal ;'os ital
p
7345 Layton St.
'39 Coast "'lvd•
7289 Amethyst
Cucamonga, CA 91730
I Jolla, CA 92037
Alta Loma, CA 91701
208 - 432 -12
?02- 091 -10
202 - 161 -10
illa W. ;ioberds
Leonard ?; Parnhild Logan
T,vrtlyn i Fritz Thomas eAi
'201 Amethyst
� Kinnison
7335 Layton
Alta morn,, CA 91761
664 w. Granada Court
Cucamonga, CA 91730
�. 02- 091 -15
Ontario, CA 91762
208- 432 -13
202 - 161 -11
'ark &, Cruz - ruiillo
^. C. 2; '�arbara Scoville et
al 'i`headore & Ter v. �
1216 Amethrst
7263 Amethyst Ave.
Uui �1 �
lta ioma, CA 91701
Alta Lana, CA 91701
Lay ton
.02-091 -16i
202 - 161 -12
7325
CA 91730
208-432-14
ennett Hnld ins Co.
Paul P.: Diane Williams
Charles ?:.Lucille Lee
Peotone, Illinois 604e8
7251 Amethyst
7315 Layton
202- 091 -31
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Cucamonga, CA 91730
202- 161613
208- 432 -15
4inifrel :Taylors Ina °arn.s
Paul & Diane Williams
Merman P, Helen !Tempel
7266 Amnth,yst
7251 Amethyst
P. 0. Rox 505
Alta Tomn, CA 91.701
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Alta Iona, CA 91701
02- 092 -03
202- 161 -15
209- 432 -16
irthur .. Mildred Allen
Pau]. 7:. Diane Williams
John I Pauline Moore
C. pox 66 7276 Amethyst
7251 Amethyst
9515 Naseline
ilta Loma, CA 91701
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Alta Loma, CA 91701
02- 092-03
202- 161 -17
20B- 432-17
ienry Rodner
Glenwood ?, 5arhara Scoville
5ftf rL7 & Laure Tipton
266 Valley ••+a•tdi w Rd.
91�io9
7263 Amethyst
9519 !-a spline
ncino, CA
Alta Coma, CA ')1701
';,, •••�r •��••� :-a, r;A 'I1730
n��_09a -O�
on7 -1..1 _1,�
.. •_rr.
Doug Ilu ne Lottie A. Patr; ?fr. and >
9341 Pepper S!• frs. Julius C. Murpily
c/o hone and Associates Cucamonga, Ca. -,730 7364 Layton Avenue
9310 Baseline Road Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701 208- 433 -08 208- 433 -17
Mr. and firs. Join L. Mc Cabe
c/o Mark Alexander
939 Coast Blvd.
La Jol,a, Ca. 92037
Mr. and Airs. Teufolau V. Toki Mr. and 11rs. Terrence L. Marost,
9349 Pepper Street 7374 Layton
Cucamonga, Ca, 91730 Cucamonga, Ca. 91731
202- 091 -10
208- 433 -09
208 - 433 -18
August H. Reiter III
Mr. and Mrs.
"I' u uu 0.
P
V ea )oil M.
P.O, Box 2.480
9357 Pepper
Street
Mc Daniel, Inc,
Newport Beach, Ca. 92663
Cucamonga,
Ca. 91730
705 :q. FOOtlill Blvd.
Azusa, Ga. 91702
202- 091 -13
208- 433 -10
- - --
208- 433 -19
Rusie Del Real
7285 Hellman Avenue
Mr. and Mrs.
Gregory
W. Mayfield M r, and Mrs, Robert Ko rondo,
Alta Loma, Ca. 91701
9363 Pepper.
Street
7394 Layton Street
Cucamonga,
California
91730 Cucamonga, Ca. 91731
202- 091 -18
208 - 433 -11
208 - 433 -20
Benneu IR)Ld Lng Cumpanv Mr. and Mrs. Christopher Carroll Mr. and Nra. Jimmv G. Greene
Peotone, Illinois 60468 9371. Pepper Street 7414 Layton Street
Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
202- 091 -31 208- 433 -12 208- 433 -21
tichard G. Gcn,,vcsu
18821 Gracohavcn
Covina, Ca. 91723
208- 433 -04
Mr. and Mrs. Harry J. Morrison Pacific Conr/
9381. Pepper .Street c/o Ray Musser
Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 911 W. Arrow Ilwy
Upland, Ca. 91786
208- 433 -13 202- 242 -06
Mr. and ?Irs, .lo hn P. Kavanaugh Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Arceneaux Pacific Coal.
738( Onyx Avenue C/o Ray Musser
Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 9391 Pepper Street 91.1 14. Arrow Hwv
Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
20A- 437 -OS
208- 433 -14 Upland, Ca. 91786
Mr. and Mrs. I)av'd A, Hopkins
7396 Onyx Avenue
Cucamonga, Cn. 91730
208 - 431 -06
Ir. and Mrs. Laurence C. ALCn
'395 Kirkwood Avonuu
:ucamonga, Ca. 9.730
08- 433 -07
Mr, and "h's. SLCphen R. Geye
7344 Layton Street
Cuonrionga, Ga. 91.730
208 - 433 -15
Mr. and ;ors. .lerry nwca
9258 F. Bnscl ine Ru•id
ALLa Loma, Ca, 91.786
, 2(2- 242 -08
Mr. and Mrs. James D. ColLings
204 'West .1 Street
Ontario, Ca. 91762
208- 433 -16
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
: �nN ElgVng01V(� (
DATE May 10, 1976
4 it
FROM Douglas Payne, Associate Planner, Ext. 3685
West Valley Planning
TO Lauren Wasserman, cc: City Council
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager City Clerk
SUBJECT Zone Change Request for June 7, 1978 (Routine)
City Council Hearing
Applicant:
R.L.
Arcinage
P.C. Hearing
246
N. Indian Hill Blvd.
Date: 4 -12 -78
Claremont,
Ca. 91711
index: W92 -57
Panel: 4632 -9
Proposal:
Zone
Change from R -1 -1 to R -1
-20m
Location:
[Vest
side of Hellman Avenue,
approximately 2000
feet
north of Banyan Street,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attached are the Planning Commission minutes, staff report, maps,
notice of hearing, mailing list and Notice of Determination.
No "T" Standards required
No withhold required
Recommendation:
1. Planning Commission recommends that zone change to R -1- 20,000
be approved.
2. Adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a
Notice of Determination.
LF
I R
• CITY COUNCIL IIEARIhAWATE: April 12, 1978 . AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
v
ROUTINE ITEM
NON - ROUTINE ITEM
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TIME OF ITEM
CITY COUNCIL
AREA: West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
FILE /IFIDEX NO: Zone Change W92 -57
PRDPOSAI.: Zone Change from R -1 -1 to R -1- 20,000
IDCATIQN: W/S Hellman, approx. 2000 feet N/o Banyan
APPLICANT: R.L. Arcinage
FNGINDER/ARCHITOCT:
11 PUOLIC NEARING NOTICES SENT ON 3 -30 -78
RITORT PRII!PNNID BY: Doug Payne
FIELD INSIL=ION TYAM: DATE OF INSPECTION:
PARCEL SIZE: 2.4 acres
EQS'TING Lvu) USE: Vacant i6 ' ' ` •
CLISTING ZONING: R -1 -1 # is
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
NORMI: Residential S Vacant
Zoned R -1 -1 ` yg
EAST: Vacant �{,wiso., ".4u
Zoned R -1 -I = >._tt�_ «..__ K.
S=J: Grove
Zoned R -1 -1 3. °"' °' SAW
WEST: Vineyard ME
Zoned R -1 -1
GENERAL PLAN NND DF5IGNATION:
None
THE ENVIRONiENTAL REVIEW OFFICER ON 2 -22 -78 DETERMINED
THAT THIS PROJECT WOULD UO-2 A NON-SIGNIPICANT F.F'PECT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Water.
Sewer
STAFT RIMAfE1DATFON:
PLANNING COMMISSION AC'T'ION:
0
Staff Analysis:
:7
The applicant has applied for a minor subdivision, number w78 -0087,
to divide the 2.4 acre site into four (4) lots approximately �
acre in size. Prior to approving the minor subdivision, the site
must be rezoned to the R- 1- 20,000 zone district. The minimum
parcel size under the present R -1 -1 zone district is one acre.
The Chaffey College General Plan, the document which governed the
site prior to City Council action on March 29 of choosing not to
adopt said plan, called for a residential density up to 1.6 dwelling
units per gross acre (up to h acre lots). This zone change request
would have been consistent with that density.
In reviewing lot patterns in the area, it would be appropriate
to approve this zone change request. The � acre lot size has been
established in the area. For ,example, to the north, Tentative
Tract 9505 has been approved with a two (2) unit per acre den-
sity. On the east, Tract 9320 is recorded with � acre lots.
To the south, Tract 9340 has also recorded with h acre lots.
with the existing ; acre lot pattern in the area, it would seem
reasonable that the General Plan now under preparation will desig-
nate the same density.
According to the County Flood Control District, the site may be
subject to infrequent overflow from Densens, Arealls and Thrope
Canyons. The recommendations from the Flood Control District
should be implemented by the minor subdivision's conditions of
approval.
The site is approximately 160 feet south of property presently
zoned R -1- 20,000. One parcel separates the site and the R- 1- 20,000
zoning. This parcel is similar to the site both in size and other
characteristics. It is, however, under different title. Since
the site is not immediately adjacent to similar zoning, the
request could be construed to be spot zoning. Therefore, should
the zone change request be approved, it would be appropriate
to include the parcel on the north in the decision.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Due to the existing � acre lot pattern in the area, there is
reasonable probability that the It -1- 20,000 zone district will
be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered.
There is little or not probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan if
the R -1- 20,000 zone district is ultimately inconsistent with
the General Plan.
• 0.
Findings: (cont.)
3. Minor Subdivision W78 -0087 has been submitted concurrently
with this zone change request.
4. There is a demand for � acre lots in the area which warrants
this zone change.
5. The zone change subject to the recommendation from Flood
Control will be in the interest of furtherance of public
health, safety and general welfare.
6. The parcel adjacent to the site on the north is similar in
size and character.
7. The property owner of the parcel to the north has been noti-
fied of this hearing.
8. The recommendation from the County Flood Control Distirct
can be implemented by the minor subdivision's conditions
of approval.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that the
R -1- 20,000 zone change be approved. Further, it is recommended
that the parcel adjacent to the north of the site, assessor's
parcel 1062 - 061 -02, be included in the zone change approval.
A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED BEFORE THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY"
COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED APPLICATION:
FILE NO.: W92 -57
PROPOSAL: Zone change from R -1 -1 to R- 1- 20,000 or such other zone
district as may be determined at the public hearing.
LOCATION: West side of Hellman Avenue, approximately 2000 feet north
of Banyon Street, Rancho Cucamonga, portion of the NW4 of
Section 27, T -1 -N, R -7 -W, SSBSM.
APPLICANT! R. L. Arcinage
PLACE OF HEARING: 9161 BASELINE AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730
DATE AND TIME OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 7, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
ANY PERSON AFFECTED BY THIS APPLICATION MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN SUPPORT
OR OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSAL AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING:.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATIC!N HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THIS PPOPOSEU PROJECT WHICH
MEANS THAT TINS COUNTY FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD HAVE NOT POSSIBLE
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING ALONG WITH THE PROPOSi:O PROJECT APPLICATION MAY
BE VIEWED AT THE PURL[(' INFORMATION COUNTER AT SAN BI <RNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING
DEPAR'T'MENT, 1111 E. MIT.]. ST., BLDG. #1, SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92415
FROM 8:00 A,M. UNTIL 5:00 P.M. FROM MAY 22, 1978 TO JUNE 6, 1978.
Question regarding the above procedures should be rIir -cued to the San Bernar-
dino County Planning Department at (714)383 -1417 or (800)472 -5694, Ext. 1417
RANCHO CUCAMON(IA CITY COUNCIL
(FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
J;, JA. 'AF ..i .SOw_ J,
�p
/Ntiyk:..c%
�.ti/ZA�Dj C,., r,2Ll1J %FIJ.V:;a -�
�A�PH G•JCI-INSuJ
Y`_
{IA•Nti.,a :Z.
C'17J
A,Tia Lj: (A
i)O 1
CIo LA&4 1i o . KA. -n!'
`I d s/ ,.0 / S .
�l
JL IL CCTJ.: vJo� ": VJ4-'�
U���.J;) CA /I(T {•
AL 7)4 CJ,,A
(�, x..30.. Y zS
r• /o /J:�. ^w,.J 1�,� a_
LQ,'AA CA `r` /7ol
6v MA.v2
]Am =: 1= 2A,c c•, 4'nJ A4 rw nr
.
'il7�l
A1714 Co,t,A Cn
P
�h{I.I i�AT21l,n rY "j i242AJ
ALrn Lo..,n cq til7�r
0 G'+ - -u71_ oI
1 4 A22y
t�i 14a_�m.a./
I,
�
A[TA Lr",Cn `ill I
;6,. r.cl
po2c., L
AC_TA Lam,: G, 41'%`)1
0 G1•
San Bernardino County - Environmen argent Agency 1111 E. Mill St., Bldg. 1, 2nd Floor
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVI San Bernardino, CA 92415
(7141 3831532
NOTICE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Reviewing Authority
Initial Study Date Review and Consultation Period
EAD log No, _Effective Date of this Determination
Project Title and Description
Conditions (/f
- Plans and specifications are available for public inspection in the office of the Environmental Analysis Division.
Pursuant to the provisions of the. California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code, Sec. 21000, etseg) and the
Environmental Administrative Guidelines for Local Entities, the County of San Bernardino has determined that the above-referenced
project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding include the written Initial Study and deliberations of the San Bernardino County
This decision may be appealed to the Board of Supervisors or Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFC), as appropriate, by any
person aggrieved, or by an officer, board, department, or bureau of the County, Any appeal shall be filed within fourteen (14) days
after the rendition of this decision, or it shall be dismissed by the Board of Supervisors or LAFC. The Notice of Appeal shall be in
writing and shall be filed in duplicate in the office of the Clerk of tbe Board of Supervisors upon forms provided by same.
This project is now ready to proceed to the
for project approval.
Sranamre
Enmonmenn/ Peview Daykv
Copy of this form filed with: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Secnury of the Plwning Commission or LAFC
Environme tid Amlyeis Division
Yn , .. i. T ^':o>::n•1 t. Ca *;.1 zd . Zrr2.II!
V 62 FJ Irnt VSGtit
ersmbunon:
Wbrte - nr
Bue - Clerk af
Green - Sli ,in, Cover, A g
ncy
Canay - EAD Praject File
Ana - fAD R een
Fig
0 0
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
3".n etv��amv
DATE May 10, 1978 d j f
FROM Douglas Payne, Associate Planner, Ext. 3685
i
West Valley Planning
TO Lauren Wasserman, cc: City Council
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager City Clerk
SUBJECT Zone Change Request for June 7, 1978
City Council Hearing (Routine)
.Applicant:
R.L.
Arcinage
P.C. Hearing
246
N. Indian Hill Blvd.
Date: 4 -12 -78
Claremont,
Ca. 91711
Index: W92 -57
Proposal:
Zone
Change from R -1 -1 to R -1 -20m Panel: 4832 -9
Location:
West
side of Hellman Avenue,
approximately 2000
feet
north of Banyan Street,
Rancho Cucamonga
Attached are the Planning Commission minutes, staff report, maps,
notice of hearing, mailing list and Notice of Determination.
No "T" Standards required
No withhold required
Recommendation:
1. Planning Commission recommends that zone change to R -1- 20,000
be approved.
2. Adopt Negative Declaration and request clerk to file a
Notice of Determination.
. CITY COUNCIL IIEARINOATE: April 12, 1978 • AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
ROUTINE ITEM
NON - ROUTINE ITEM
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TIME OF ITEM
. CITY COUNCIL
AREA: West Valley / Rancho Cucamonga
FILB/INDEX NO: Zone Change W92 -57
PROPOSAL: Zone Change from R -1 -1 to R -1- 20,000
LOCN1'ION: W/S Hellman, approx. 2000 feet N/o Banyan
APPLICANT: R.L. Arcinage
ENGINF1WAF01I7=:
11 PUBLIC UFAR1NG NOTICES SENT ON 3 -30 -78
REInI7T PIL:PAMI) BY: Doug Payne
FIELD INSPE7-71ON TEAM: DATE OF INSPECTION:
PARCEL SIZE: 2.4 acres
EXISTING WID USE: Vacant
EKISTING ZCNTNG: P. -1 -1
'-W SURI2WNDTNG I.11ND USE NND ZONING
NORTH: Residential S Vacant
Zoned R -1 -1
EAST: Vacant
Zoned R -1 -1
SOUR 1: Grove
Zoned R -1 -1
WEST: Vineyard
Zoned R -1 -1
GENEINAL PLAN AND DESIGNATION:
None
THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OFFICER ON 2 -22 -78 DETERMINED
THAT 'I'11I5 PROJECT WOULD EAVC A NON- SIGNfFICI\NT ENFE:CT O.N THE
ENVIRONMENT. — "- - --
Water, Service
Sewer Service
� STAFF IlxC<`T97NDATEOI:
PLANNING COMMISSION AC'T'ION:
9 0
Staff Analysis:
The applicant has applied for a minor subdivision, number W78 -0087,
to divide the 2.4 acre site into four (4) lots approximately �
acre in size. Prior to approving the minor subdivision, the site
must be rezoned to the R -1- 20,000 zone district. The minimum
parcel size under the present R -1 -1 zone district is one acre.
The Chaffey College General Plan, the document which governed the
site prior to City Council action on March 29 of choosing not to
adopt said plan, called for a residential density up to 1.6 dwelling
units per gross acre (up to h acre lots). This zone change request
would have been consistent with that density.
In reviewing lot patterns in the area, it would be appropriate
to approve this zone change request. The y acre lot size has been
established in the area. For example, to the north, Tentative
Tract 9505 has been approved with a two (2) unit per acre den-
sity. On the east, Tract 9320 is recorded with is acre lots.
To the south, Tract 9340 has also recorded with ' acre lots.
With the existing y acre lot pattern in the area, it would seem
reasonable that the General Plan now under preparation will desig-
nate the same density.
According to the County Flood Control District, the site may be
subject to infrequent overflow from Densens, Arealls and Thrope
Canyons. The recommendations from the Flood Control District
should be implemented by the minor subdivision's conditions of
approval.
The site is approximately 160 feet south of property presently
zoned R -1- 20,000. One parcel separates the site and the R -1- 20,000
zoning. This parcel is similar to the site both in size and other
characteristics. It is, however, under different title. Since
the site is not immediately adjacent to similar zoning, the
request could be construed to be spot zoning. Therefore, should
the zone change request be approved, it would be appropriate
to include the parcel on the north in the decision.
Findings:
Based upon the analysis, Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Due to the existing h acre lot pattern in the area, there is
reasonable probability that the R -1- 20,000 zone district will
be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered.
There is little or not probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general plan if
the R -1- 20,000 zone district is ultimately inconsistent with
the General Plan.
. , • 0
Findings: (cont.)
3. Minor Subdivision W78 -0087 has been submitted concurrently
with this zone change request.
4. There is a demand for h acre lots in the area which warrants
this zone change.
5. The zone change subject to the recommendation from Flood
Control will be in the interest of furtherance of public
health, safety and general welfare.
6. The parcel adjacent to the site on the north is similar in
size and character.
7. The property owner of the parcel to the north has been noti-
fied of this hearing.
8. The recommendation from the County Flood Control Distirct
can be implemented by the minor subdivision's conditions
of approval.
Recommendation:
Based upon the findings and analysis, Staff recommends that the
R -1- 20,000 zone change be approved. Further, it is recommended
that the parcel adjacent to the north of the site, assessor's
parcel 1062 - 061 -02, be included in the zone change approval.
a. I �,� 1 ,1 f {,• � � t '' i
A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED BEFORE TIII: RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY
COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED APPLICATION:
FILE NO.: W92 -57
PROPOSAL: Zone change from R -1 -1 to R- 1- 201000 or such other zone
district as may be determined at the public hearing.
LOCATION: West side of Hellman Avenue, approximately 2000 feet north
of Banyon Street, Rancho Cucamonga, portion of the NA of
Section 27, T -1 -N, R -7 -W, SBBSM.
APPLICANT: R. L. Arcinage
PLACE OF HEARING: 9141 BASELINE AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730
DATE AND TIME OF HEARING: Wednesday, June 7, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
ANY PERSON AFFECTED BY THIS APPLICATION MAY APPEAR AND HE HEARD IN SUPPORT
OR OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSAL AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING.
A NP:r1ATIVE DRCLAI2ATION DAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THIS PRO.IFCT WHTCH
MEANS THAT Till', COUNTY FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROXT CT WOULD HAVE NOT POSSIBLE.
SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVi RONMPNTAL EFFECTS.
TIIE IiNVIRONMENTAL FT14DING ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED PRnJ1 {l "I' APPLICATION MAY
BE, VIEWED AT Till; PUBLIC, INFORMATION COUNTER AT SAN I3P:RNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, 1.111 E. MILL ST., BLDG. 111, SAN DRRNARDT.NO, CA. 92415
FROM 8;00 A.M. UNTIL 5:00 P.M. FROM MAY 22, 1978 TO JUNE 6, 1978.
Question regarding the above procedures should he dir;,cred to the San Bernar-
dino County Planning Department at (714)383 -1417 or (800)472 -5694, Ext. 1417
RANCHO CUCA[ION(;A CITY COUNCIL
n
u
Gerald & Ch<ar'line 11aaell
2771 Beryl
Alta Inca, CA 91701
Miller Hanes, Inc.
c/o Larry VoskaM.
9212 Cottornood Way
Alta I.tlia, CA 91701
RLU n & Christine Luna
P.O.BOx 425
Alta Lama, CA 91701
James & Frances Van Antwerp
5820 Hellman
Alta La1a , CA 91701
John & Patricia fiargrave
5795 Hcllman
Alta Lrno, CA 91701
Harry D. & Prances Worley
5655 Hellman
Alta Lana, CA 91701
Percy L. & Lorna Miller
5659 l lellm
Alta Lana, CA 91701
Ralph B. Johnson
051 Paintao Dr.
Glendora, CA 91740
Lewis harts, /Calif.
924 W. 9th St.
Upland, CA 9178,
Lynn IL=ison
1" c% Norwit, Ricj4le
Lynn Harrison
c/o Norwin Riggle
9060 Manz
Alta Iona, CA 91701
john V- TSutrcS
190y OCiV\6%o S�-
Cap r117b I
San Bernardino County - Environmental bo °oddment Agency 1111 E. Mill St.. Bldg, t, 2nd Floor
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVIS• • San Bernardino, CA 92415
(714) 3831532
NGTICE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Reviewing Authority
Initial Study Date y l Review and Consultation Period -
EAD Log No. Effective Date of this Determination
Project Title and Description
Location .. - '..i,.
Conditions (If
Plans and specifications are available for public inspection in the officeof the Environmental Analysis Division.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Duality Act of 1970 (Pudic Resources Code, Sec. 21000, etseq) and the
Environmental Administrative Guidelines for Local Entlbes, the County of San Bernardino has determined that the above - referenced
project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding include the written Initial Study and deliberations of the San Bernardino County
. .. . _.. - I .. I - . "71 -...
This decision may be appealed to the Board of Supervisors or Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFC), as appropriate, by any
person aggrieved, or by an officer, board, department, or bureau of the County. Any appeal shall be filed within fourteen (14) days
after the rendition of this decision, or it shall be dismissed by the Board of Supervisors or LAFC. The Notice of Appeal shall be in
writing and shall be filed in duplicate in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors upon forms provided by same.
This project is now ready to proceed to the r '•
for project approval.
Sreel
Envnrennpnral Review ORber
Copy of t his form filed with Clerk of the Board of Supervnors
Serni ery of the Planning Commimpn or LAFC
Envirenman0l Amlyor Division
HEAD 91771
, r' � r.•�rrr:: ?r:'. :;d t'arrz:e
c':o CUC1inr,nr?SI CA 09595
Darnbunon:
Anne - AFpbcenr,
Blue - Clerk of Board or LAFC
Gceen - Sponoanry County Apncy
Canary - EAD project FAe
Fmk - EAD Readme File
GdCarmef - Copy
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
a«1
RESOLUTION NO.
/ /RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE VACATION OF
A PORTION OF ALPINE STREET, EAST, F SALINA STREET AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 11
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Mayor and Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, having heard the evidence offered in relation to the proposed
vacation of that portion of Alpine Street lying East of Salina Street and
South of Arrow Route, more particularly described in the City Resolution
of Intention No. , hereby find from all the evidence submitted that
such portiL of said Alpine Street proposed to be vacated by Reid resolution
is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes.
SECTI0311., The Mayor and Srm on Council of said City do hereby order
the vacation of that portion of Alpine Street lying East of Salina Street
and South of Arrow Route, more particularly described as follows:
That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter
of Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot 52, Tract No. 5347,
as per map recorded in Book 66 of Maps, pages 11 and 12,
Records of said County; thence North 890 42' 34" West 116.85
feet along the Westerly prolongation of the North line of
said Lot 52 to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to
the Southeast and having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence
Southwesterly along said tangent curve, through an angle of
90° 25' 05 ", an arc distance of 31.56 feet to a point of
tangency with the East line of Salina Street, 66.00 feet
wide; thence North 0° 07' 39" West 100.00 feet to a point
of cusp with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast and
having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along
said curve, through an angle of 89° 34' 55" an arc
60
III
4
5
6
7
6
HH
14
16
17
I
•
distance of 31.34 feet to a point of tangency, with a line
that is parallel with and 60.00 feet North of the North
line of said Lot 52; thence tangent to said curve South 89°
42' 34" East 117.15 feet along said parallel line to the
Northerly prolongation of the West line of said Lot 52;
thence South 00 07' 39" East 60.00 feet along said
prolongation to the POINT OF BEGINNING
SECTION 3. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall
cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of
the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by
the Mayor and A4. Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a
n p
't�(ha meeting thereof held on the _ day
of 1978, by the following vote, to -wit;
AYE Councilmen : /QM It'" hJ2p
Ia�YJa.I �Tlndv� i
NOES:
ABSENT:
21 City Clerk
22 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 7d
23 day of , 1978.
24
26
Approved as to form:
ty Attorney
31
Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
4
w
0 02
ID
*e J�i, 19
4
L-1 -1 L
41
SALINA Si
I w I-M
347
1 5 AG
05
ol'A--4.
Por CumMonga Fruit tonds,M.8. 419
Cucomongo
Tax Code Area
6706
!T3�2—)
FZZMIMO1C TE5 ACCA 7-0,9E ABANG IVE/J
Assessor's Map
Note-Assessor '5 jk. 8 Lot Book 209 Page 04
Numbers Sh~ in GinUt.s Son Bernardino County
2o9 -v4
•
Wlk7
1 -Q -66 UK
,, 1 76 AM 78 YF
411.77 IUCM
,-,: U. %. P , —4 C. i i , , . , J,, � I,. i,
. P., 55. L. 1:�.
A10-
229
ARROW
A
, 36,1
0 02
ID
*e J�i, 19
4
L-1 -1 L
41
SALINA Si
I w I-M
347
1 5 AG
05
ol'A--4.
Por CumMonga Fruit tonds,M.8. 419
Cucomongo
Tax Code Area
6706
!T3�2—)
FZZMIMO1C TE5 ACCA 7-0,9E ABANG IVE/J
Assessor's Map
Note-Assessor '5 jk. 8 Lot Book 209 Page 04
Numbers Sh~ in GinUt.s Son Bernardino County
2o9 -v4
•
Wlk7
1 -Q -66 UK
,, 1 76 AM 78 YF
411.77 IUCM
1 5 AG
05
ol'A--4.
Por CumMonga Fruit tonds,M.8. 419
Cucomongo
Tax Code Area
6706
!T3�2—)
FZZMIMO1C TE5 ACCA 7-0,9E ABANG IVE/J
Assessor's Map
Note-Assessor '5 jk. 8 Lot Book 209 Page 04
Numbers Sh~ in GinUt.s Son Bernardino County
2o9 -v4
•
Wlk7
1 -Q -66 UK
,, 1 76 AM 78 YF
411.77 IUCM
§8322 CHANGE or GR.ADF. AND VACATION [DiV9, Pt3
this part ,hull be expressed in its ordinance or resolution of intention
to order any Duration.
LE(:ISI..ATl VE HISTORY
1. Ad.!ed tq Sr.,n in❑ di c:o § 1 P I:GN.
. Amended by Slab 1159 el, 691 51 p '_6U3, adding "or resolution" after
c'OLLATPRAL REFERENCES
ea Jur _d Ilfgbways and 5t reels § 136.
NOTES OF
In netion by city le rlo, t d, fm d lute
from land .alleg..l to 1 .. pal. ilc sr tot
and to eni.•in Wvm ftnn — ,o,,,ing
or —in_ suell AlA. rite had I ot'n
of pro ins nyalidite of robe ien
DECISIONS
elating street and all Presumption.
I. • "n favor of rnli.lil, of onlinauo-
of inir 0iun to verate :u,,I close street
\aliimal Coy v inudop (1918) 86 CJ
13x.t, 194 I.9d 7S9.
6 8322. Same: Contents of ordinance or resolution: Notices:
Inclusion of one or more streets. IieInt'e the vmmtioo or may street
or part Ihereuf i, littered. the city roineil .shall pass ;in nrdinanrr
or resolution deg la in¢ its inteniLm to do so, referring to the st r. rI
or Part thereof by il% lawful or official italic or the mule by which it
ix ........ lmJ. lk nn.n and ref. rrinit to A map a, pion un line it, the
o0ie of lire City clerk file particulars as to the proposed vm'atien
The ordinance or resolution of intention %ball fix n time and p1:n•e
for hearing all persons inrerestrd in or objection to the prols:ged
r.eatinn, which time .hall he not I... than 15 days from the date
of the passage of the ordinan•... or resolution, and shall he pnblisln l
or pnsred in the mauler proscribed by lair for the publidnine or
posting of ordinnnce, of the rite. Smites of stmel varatinn %hail
be pnsn•d run... cunn.le :June the line of the street or part thetas
proposed to be vacated ;it least 10 days before the dale set Or
hoarier . G1r11 uolieca .bull he post. d not more than 300 fret apart.
hilt of hm.t th,re %hall he pea rd. S l+ nolirrs slim] ItNC the
pasn,,e of the ordinal a or resolution of intention and Ili, time and
Phil" of the blaring.
One or store posits, or part, thereof, whether contiguous or not
may be inelnded and vacated under the same ordinance or resolution
of intention.
I,FMSLATIA•E HISTORY
1. Added be Slats 1941 In e3n § I , 13'9.
9. Amr..b.1 by state 1913 eh 191. § I P Intl, (1) adding "a, Part tbrrrnp'
after -'along tlw tun• of tire street" m the tlnrd sentence; And (9) aldntitolinr
.11.11 1 -., -for •'inn 1. ".. in for Lmrta e.nt.nrr.
3. Aman.lr.l by Stnf" 1919 cb ]Leo § 1 P =11n, ad.l ;ng "At le'" ten des.,
before the date set for beano F' Al lho end of the Wind aentenea.
4. Amended by Stab 10.19 eh 6 21 §g P 9603, adding "Air r ... let""' After
•orJivanee" throughout elm section.
COLLATERAL REFERENCES
Cal Joe ^d Highways and Stree[r 1156.
Am Joe 1..P+.,m1 :.' -. n.... r.,s
0121 V,U, -rjUN u, CITY STILBETS § 8323
Annotations:
1:) AI -It ;GO (nrrex.ity ror .nl6ering
to stuentory procedure prescribed for
dismetiuuaure of street ar hip,way).
.x +lieu er
NOTES OF DECISIONS
in of thin.
n -v t
streets ineideut to ma.trurtion Of free
.VI pm m'lio
"Al". of for oMipapla of Intel
, was not'o L he a of failur
,
to e,le a atne4. National City
li
in ngdy with regmre routs of notice,
n
Pooh, (lP 18) so CA it 3tlu, 191 P
up.. r'n.ity to protest, and hearing
Opening Act of
F. +A tbonell 11.e enperintrndent or
.,•••'died by here,
1.59 we Street V3enlwo Act of 1911,
Ant the illy rogin r te.lifv
a Power to Provide by agreement
nntiees were not putted, the ore-
for closing at streets incident to cot,
tbot
^dirt oNleial lat, list beam
st,,r ion of freex'a)' is prrvldrd by
......
Performed" and Other the
§ 1n0.9, nuthoriring In,arllnent of
101111
1, , ha. been obeyed" to then selee
1'eldie Works to enter into ngrecnnent
�o1ot ii V• sn0lrient r,ill'•nrn le soi'
with sty r u.n slid, Por.mnt to
Uu
n..rut finding of paper polling, wldeh
seen agree t, to deer nay ern It of
,n a, be lit,tr lmd u," Appeal.
or ear its Imereepcna will, any free.
'..dim : :d Cole . Pnalup (191x) NG CA
way And not n.gnine, fermalltles of
:I so. 191 112d 7.5,
lbe, ail.. Armin v Oakland (1900)
Pity .... roil rwolnlion ."",.ring
193 CAN 137, 6 Cal RPtr 750.
.,r mrntith state to those crernin
§ 8323. Hearing: Order of vacation. The city emueil -11,111, nn
,lir dsy tlsrd for the hearing, or on the clay to n,hieh the henrag
is postponed or r-thin Red, hen, the evidence oRerrd by any person
iotet•sted. If the city ruuncil finds, from :dl Ile• evidence snb-
miurJ, that any -f pert ur part Ihereuf, described in the ordinanec or
...... bition of iotrnlion, is unnecessary for present or prusprelive
pnhlie street purposes, the city council any nuthe its order vacating;
such street or part thereof.
l,E,)751.ATIVE HISTORY
1. Added by Slat- 1911 chi 93o § 1 P 13:19.
9. Amended by State 1939 eh 621 13 or 2606, ewmg "or resolution" after
COLLATERAL REFERENCES
CA Jur 24 Mullwnys all sterile
Stela try's eat tlig steel ts § ^_t.
Am Jur l(igherays (1st cd § 191).
NOTES of DECISIONS
A city moil i not ioull,ited
eoik
City n cil rsmlulon approving
P.• n eelo I by the Po Will
ogre entttnilh state to elmc certain
works mnnmittee o pr tidings for
streets Arid eat to construction of
I.
.., of n, Le , for 163
[rc yay tat "'ill Lee of Gil
or A ...lilt n thon•I,
Ifnil,
a to mply with np,l iota of
fl, report r �ed for she of
notice, oPPortunily to Protraq and
f nuatively iM1al the i�rvprrty O "ll"
her ing s`,rr i4ed I, Sto-t v P' dog
the r ration was rr"or -led one ter
Act O[ 1.9.9 nr Street YAratio Art of
tb.. needed ror n stein or for nos,
I, 11, since power to Pro, ide by nglor
{ n, +Pre Gt ruse m r Alpert. Los _toga_
- rnt for claims Of atrces imridrte to
•
•
0 0
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
SCHOOL FACILITIES FEE ORDINANCE
SEC. A. AUTHORITY. This Chapter is adopted pursuant to the pro-
visions of Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Sec.65970) of Division 1 of
Title 7 of the Government Code.
SEC. B. PURPOSE. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby finds and declares as follows:
(1) Adequate temporary school facilities should be available for
pupils caused by new residential developments.
(2) The purpose of this Chapter is to provide a method for financing
interim school facilities necessitated by new residential developments
causing conditions of overcrowding.
SEC. C DEFINITIONS. Except where the context otherwise requires,
the definitions given in this section govern the construction of this
article.
(1) The term "developer" includes every person, firm, corporation,
or other business entity constructing or installing a new dwelling unit
or mobile home space, either directly or through the services of any
employee, agent, or independent contractor.
(2) The term "dwelling unit" includes each single family dwelling
and each unit of a multiple unit dwelling structure, such as apartments,
designed as a separate habitation for one or more occupants. The term
"dwelling unit" also includes new factory -built housing installed in
accordance with Section 19950 et seq, of the Health and Safety Code of
the State of California.
0 0
(3) The term "mobile home space" includes each space in a mobile
home park designed to be used for parking a mobile home on a temporary,
semi- permanent or permanent basis.
(G) The term "school district" incudes all school districts located
in whole or in part within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(5) "Conditions of overcrowding" means that the total projected
enrollment of a school during the eighteen (18) months following occupancy
of the proposed development exceeds the capacity of each school as
determined by the district's reasonable class size formulae and specific
classroom use designated by the district for the particular year of the
report as defined in Section D of this ordinance. In no case shall the
t
capacity so computed exceed the design capacity of the school as deter-
mined by the State Bureau of School Facilities Planning.
(6) "Reasonable methods for mitigating conditions of overcrowding"
shall include, but are not limited to, agreements between a developer
and the affected school district whereby temporary -use buildings will
be made available to the school district at no cost, or whereby temporary -
use buildings owned by the school district will be used, the cost of
relocation and installation to be borne by the developer.
(7) "Residential development" means a project containing residential
dwellings, including mobile homes, apartments, or one or more units or
a subdivision of land for the purpose of constructing or locating thereon
one or more residential dwelling units.
SEC. D. NOTIFICATION OF CONDITIONS OF OVERCROWDING. The governing
body of a school district which operates, in whole or in part, within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga may, at any time, pursuant to Government
r
2
0
Code Section 65971, notify the City Council that conditions of over-
crowding exist in one or more attendance areas within the district.
Such notice shall be in writing and shall set forth the clear and con-
vincing evidence upon which such finding is based and shall include
the reasonable mitigating solutions considered. Evidence of continued
overcrowding shall be verified for the City Council in the annual audit
report as defined in Section J of this ordinance.
SEC. E. DESIGNATION OF OVERCROWDED SCHOOL. Within thirty (30)
days of receipt of a school district's notice of overcrowding, the City
Council shall do one of the following:
(1) Concur in the district's findings.
(2) Not concur in the district's findings. The City Council shall
state the reason for not concurring in the district's findings, citing
specific sections of the Government Code or of this ordinance.
(3) Inform the district that there are specific overriding fiscal,
economic, social, or environmental factors which would benefit the city,
thereby justifying the approval of the residential development otherwise
subject to Government Code Section 65974. The specific overriding factors
shall be stated by the City Council.
If the City Council concurs in the district's findings, all residen-
tial development within the attendance area certified as overcrowded shall
be subject to the payment of fees as specified in Section H of this
ordinance.
SEC. F. ACTIONS AFFECTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Within the
attendance area where it has been determined, pursuant to Sections C and
D, that conditions of overcrowding exist, the City Council shall not
approve an ordinance rezoning property to a residential use, grant a
3
0 0
building permit for residential use, approve a tentative subdivision
map as a portion of some prior tentative map approved within such area,
except as provided in Section G of this ordinance.
SEC. G. EXCEPTIONS. Notwithstanding Section F, the City Council
may approve residential developments in attendance areas which have
been designated as overcrowded if the City Council makes one of the
following findings:
(1) The developer requesting the Councils approval of a proposed
residential development has entered into a written agreement with the
affected school district for the provision of classrooms and related
facilities to alleviate the overcrowded condition.
i
(2) There exist specific overriding fiscal, economic, social or
environmental factors which, in the judgment of the City Council, would
benefit the community as a whole or justify the approval of the residential
development, as stated in Section E of this ordinance.
SEC. H. PAYMENT OF FEES. Except as provided in Section F, every
developer constructing or installing any new dwelling unit of mobile
home space in an attendance area which has been designated as being
overcrowded, pursuant to Section E, shall pay fees to the affected
school district.
(1)
(2) The fees shall be collected by the City Council which issues
building permits prior to the issuance of the permits and forwarded to
the school district within ten (10) days of receipt.
4
0 0
SEC. I. DISTRICT SCHEDULE. Following the decision of the City
Council to require the payment of fees, the governing body of the
school district shall submit a proposed schedule in accordance with
Government Code Section 65976.
Such schedule shall specify how the district will use the fees
to solve the problems of overcrowding. The schedule shall state
(a) the classroom facilities to be obtained, (b) the location of the
classrooms, and (c) the times such classrooms will be available. If
the district cannot meet the schedule, it shall submit the modifications
and the reasons therefore to the City Council.
SEC. S. ACCOUNTING. Any school district receiving funds pursuant
a
to this article shall maintain a separate accounting for any fees paid
and shall file a report with the City Council on the balance of the
account at the end of the previous fiscal year and the facilities leased,
purchased, or constructed during the previous fiscal year. In addition,
the report shall specify which attendance areas will continue to be
overcrowded when the fall term begins and where conditions of overcrowding
will no longer exist. Such report shall be filed by August 1 of each
year and shall be filed more frequently at the request of the City Council.
SEC. K. APPLICABLE USES AND DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS.
(1) The fees collected shall be used only to pay the increased
costs associated with the attendance area /school certified as overcrowded
which result from the impact of the additional students who reside in the
development paying the fees and may not be used for the construction
of permanent buildings. Exceptions to the utilization of the fees in
the designated attendance area /school are authorized in the event that
attendance boundaries are changed in such a way that students from
5
pre - existing homes or new homes are transferred to temporary or perma-
nent facilities elsewhere in the district in order to accomodate students
from the development paying the fees in existing schools.
Authorized examples of increased costs would include:
(a) Lease of temporary facilities
(b) Payment of additional transportation costs, including
bus purchase.
(c) Moving and installation costs for temporary facilities.
(d) Purchasing of additional instructional equipment required
for additional students who reside in developments paying the fees.
(e) On -site and off -site development for temporary or perma-
nent buildings.
(2) Where two separate school districts operate schools in an
attendance area where overcrowding conditions exist for both school
districts, the City Council shall enter into an agreement with the
governing body of each school district for the purpose of determining
the distribution of revenues from the fees levied pursuant to this chapter.
SEC. L. TERMINATION. If overcrowding conditions no longer exist,
as shown by the school district's report designated in Section J of
this ordinance, the City Council shall cease levying any fee pursuant to
this article.
SEC. M. SEVERAEILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and
each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof,
6
0 0
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SEC. M. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall go into effect and
be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its
adoption and prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the
passage thereof and shall be published in the
a newspaper published in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California.
i
7
0
PROCCDURES FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF
OF SCHOOL OVERCROWDING
Definitions:
a. "Affected School District" shall mean a school district which
contains an impacted school(s).
b. "Attendance area of an impacted school" shall mean the attendance
area for an impacted school as defined by the governing board of
the district involved.
c. "Council" shall mean the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
d. "Declaration of Impaction" shall mean the resolution the governing
board of a district submits to the City Council to be declared
an affected school district.
e. "District" means school district.
f. "Governing board" shall mean the governing board of a district
which has school attendance area within the incorporated area of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
g. "Impacted School" shall mean a school whose total enrollment,
including enrollment from proposed development, exceeds its
rated capacity.
h. "Proposed Development" shall mean development for which an
application has been filed by a developer.
I. "Rated Capacity" shall mean that capacity determined by the
governing board of a school district to be the maximum
acceptable enrollment in a school facility, based on the governing
board's policies and programs.
J. "Supportive findings" shall mean those facts, policy statements
and assumptions the governing board of a district uses to deter-
mine rated capacity and to declare a school impacted.
0 0
DEC.ARA'CION OF IMPACTION
BY SCHOOL DISTRICT
O,ualification: Any school district, which has a school with an attendance
area - - or a portion thereof - - located in the incorporated area of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the governing board of the district
determines that such school is impacted, shall be eligible to participate
in the procedures herein by filing a declaration of impaction.
Preparation of Declaration: Preparation of a declaration of impaction
by the governing board shall be accomplished in the following manner:
a. Filing of Declaration: The declaration of impaction resolution
and necessary accompanying documentation may be filed at any time
during the year, and annually thereafter. The declaration of
impaction resolution must be accompanied by the Master Plan for
location of public schools as required by the Bureau of School
Facilities of the State of California.
b. Determination of Impaction:
(1) Rated Capacity. The governing board shall determine the rated
capacity of any school facility it deems should be subject to
the provisions of these regulations. Such rated capacity
shall not exceed the guidelines established by the Bureau of
School Facilities of the State of California.
(2) Impaction. The governing board may determine a school to be
impacted if the total enrollment for the school, including
enrollment for proposed development(s), exceeds the rated
capacity established pursuant to subsection b(I) above.
Supportive findings shall be provided as to estimation of
enrollment.
c. Review of Options: Prior to filing a declaration of impaction to
activate the procedures established in the articles hereafter, it
shall be incumbent upon the governing board of the district to have
considered the below listed options:
(1) Reasonable school boundary realignment
(2) Elimination of non - instructional uses of classrooms
Impaction Resolution: The declaration of impaction shall be in the
re
form of a solution of the governing board of the district to the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The resolution
shall demonstrate that rated capacity has been established for the
subject school, that projected enrollment will cause the school
to be impacted, and that the governing board has exercised all
Options pursuant to subsection c above that it believes are reasonable
and possible. Accompanying the resolution shall be all supportive
findings and discussion of the governing board's review of options.
0 0
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
From Task Force for Possible Implementation of Senate Bill 201
Task Force Members
Floyd Stork
Jack Whitney
Jim Crowell
Doug Hone
Ray Trujillo
Sharon Romero
Earl Kunkel
Michael Zinkin
Curt Bonniville
Ken Willis
Lauren Wasserman
This task force had its first meeting on April 11, 1978. It has had a total of
six Thursday meetings through June 1. Meetings began at 4:30 and continued
through the dinner hour. Members of the task force have worked very diligently
and it is hoped that this report to you,with the recommendat ions it contains,
gives you the information you need and substantially completes the task assigned
to us.
In drawing up these recommendations and outline the proposed ordinance, we have
availed ourselves of the services of the City Attorney. LEgal advice was neces-
sary because the task force really did brainstorm the entire spectrum of alterna-
tives available to it. If, on the basis of this recommendation, the City Council
does adopt an ordinance under the provisions of S.H. 201, it will, of course,
wish to review thoroughly the legality of all provisions.
At one of its early sessions, the chief administrators of all of the school
districts of Rancho Cucamonga met with the task force to outline their current
student housing problems. The following is a brief summary of this information:
1. Two districts, Etiwanda and Cucamonga, currently have sufficient
student housing and will have for the next two years.
2. A portion of the Cucamonga School District (the Guasti School
District will be incorporated into the Cucamonga District on
July 1, 1978) is within the city limits of Ontario.
3. The districts with growing problems are Central, Alta Loma, and
the Rancho Cucamonga portion of the Chaffey Joint Union High
School District. The three situations are as follows:
Central School District
Current enrollment - 2,040. Current student housing capacity - 1,800.
The District has been successful in a recent bond and state appor-
tionment election and will be beginning construction on a new elemen-
tary school and an addition to the Junior High School.
The Central District currently is in need of interim housing for its
0 0
Alta Loma School District
Current enrollment - 3,200. Student capacity available - 2,640.
An additional one -half elementary school will be available in
September 1978 and an entire elementary school is scheduled to be
available in February 1979.
The Alta Loma School District is currently in need of interim housing.
The District has local voter approval of enough additional local
bonds and state loan funds to complete two additional elementary
schools, including site purchases. The construction budget for the
completion of the Alta Loma Jr. High School was approved in
Sacramento on May 16, 1978. Construction should begin in early
1979. The District is currently eligible to complete another
elementary school. Procedures for purchasing the site are now
underway. The timely construction of this school is dependent on
the passage of Proposition 1 on the June ballot.
A problem in planning common to both Alta Loma and Central District is
that possible voter approval of Proposition 13 may reduce the amount
or delay the time when additional local bonds can be sold. This, of
course, would affect any calendar for the construction of permanent
buildings.
Chaffey Joint Union High School District
This District's geographical location and student housing problems
are very different from those of the elementary districts. First
of all, it has within its boundaries, the territory of four cities
plus considerable unincorporated territory. The student housing
problems are in the northern portions of the District, especially
in Alta Loma High School in Rancho Cucamonga. Alta Loma High
School currently has twenty relocatable classrooms that will be
District property at the end of the lease - purchase agreement. It
is also on an extended day program to enable it to house its stu-
dents.
Unlike Alta Loma and Central Districts, the Chaffey District voters
have not approved the financing for permanent additional student
housing in the geographical portion of the District where the stu-
dents live. In that there is no voter approval for these perma-
nent facilities, interim housing, as the term applies to Central
and Alta Loma Districts, does not fit the Chaffey situation.
Interim housing may be defined by the City Council in any reasonably
legal way. However, for the Central and Alta Loma Districts, it
has a specific meaning within the State School Building Program.
Interim housing is that which is leased for less than three years.
Possible passage of Proposition 13 would seem to bar the Chaffey
District from holding a Lease - Purchase election where only a majo-
rity vote is required. The 2/3 rule of the proposition would seem
to apply.
The problem of furnishing interim housing to the students of Rancho
Cucamonga has been complicated by the following:
1. The city boundaries as they relate to the boundaries of the
four elementary districts.
2
2. The two- tiered school structure, with a high school and
elementary district covering the same area.
3. A high school district that covers the territory of three
other cities.
4. The widely varying rates of growth among the elementary
districts.
S. The concentration of high school growth in the northern
area of Chaffey District.
6. The approval or non - approval of voters to vote funds to
secure permanent housing.
7. The types and combinations of financing school districts
use to build permanent facilities. (Local bonds, state
loans, combination of both, lease- purchase overrides, and
general fund)
It is the hope of the task force that the suggested wording in the proposed
ordinance will have taken into account the complexity of the problem and yet
be workable for all; will be of temporary assistance to the school districts
involved; and will make Rancho Cucamonga a finer city for its young people.
In addition to our suggestions for the content and wording of a proposed city
ordinance, and the proposed wording for guide to school districts in filing
a Declaration of Impaction, the task force wishes to include some additional
clarification of intent derived from our deliberations.
1. It is our intention to keep the functions of city council and school
boards separate so that they will not be involved in each other's busi-
ness any more than is necessary for the smooth working of this ordinance.
Consequently, the wording of the Declaration of Impaction requires of
school boards only that which the law itself requires or that which could
reasonably be required of a school board by a city council in order to
discharge its reponsibilities under S.B. 201.
2. All funds are intended to be used for interim purposes except
where permanent on- or off -site improvements may be necessary.
3
• .•
4. On the basis of current rental costs plus the costs of installation and
removal of temporary classrooms, the task force is suggesting a fee
to be divided by the elementary and high school districts involved
according to Section 13 of the proposed ordinance. It will be
necessary to review this figure on a regular basis because of the change
in the cost of labor and materials in the building industry. Government
Code Section 65974(b) requires an adopted ordinance to be in effect
thirty (30) days prior to implementation of the fee requirement. The
fee should probably be reviewed prior to final reading before official
adoption.
5. The Task Force has made no recommendation at this time requiring the
dedication of land which is also provided for in S.B. 201. Circumstances
may he such at a later date that the City Council may wish to implement
this provision of the law.
6. It is understood by the Task Force and the school districts involved that
all interim housing problems will not be relieved by September 1978.
7. It is the belief of the members of the Task Force that the operation of
the proposed ordinance be carefully monitored so that it is accomplishing
that which is intended. If the City Council wishes,the members of the
Task Force will continue to serve for a period of time in order that
the effects of our effort can be reviewed, and if revision is necessary,
a well- informed group as the Task Force can be of considerable help.
8. It cannot be overemphasized that S.B. 201, under whose authority this
proposed ordinance is submitted, is a means by which only interim
facilities can be made available. These fees are a "one time" assess-
ment, while the lease on these buildings will go on each year they
are in use. The buildings will need to be returned but the children
from the new homes will remain and unless the citizens of the impacted
school districts, together with the citizens of the State of California,
make immediate and reliable plans for the construction of permament
facilities in growing communities, the implementation of S.B. 201
could create a greater problem rather than solve one.
In order that there be no misunderstanding of the temporary nature
of the housing to be made available under this ordinance, it is agreed
that interim housing for the elementary districts involved be set at
less than a three -year lease, and for the high school district, at no
more than a five -year lease. The two elementary districts involved are
bound under state regulations to leases of less than three years. The
high school district administration has agreed to the five -year limit,
the interim period to be used by the citizens of the district to deter-
mine how they are going to resolve the permanent housing problem plus
allowing time to build the permanent facilities.
9. The high school and elementary districts will, apart from this proposed
ordinance and at the recommendation of the task force, explore the
possibility of a joint powers agreement among themselves in order to
obtain more flexibility in the use of the temporary facilities supplied
by this ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, PROVIDING FOR FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL
FACILITIES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant
to the provisions of Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970)
of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.
SECTION 2. Purpose. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, hereby finds and declares as follows:
(a) Adequate temporary school facilities should
be available for pupils caused by new residential developments.
(b) New residential developments may require the
expansion of existing public schools or the construction of new
school facilities.
(c) New residential developments frequently cause
conditions of overcrowding in existing school facilities which can-
not immediately be alleviated by school districts under existing cap-
ital funding laws.
(d) The public health, safety and welfare require
a new method of financing for interim school facilities to alleviate
conditions of overcrowding in the public schools caused by new res-
idential developments.
SECTION 3. Definitions.
(a) The term "developer" includes every person,
firm, corporation, or other business entity constructing or install-
ing a new dwelling unit or mobile home space, either directly or
through the services of any employee, agent, or independent contrac-
tor.
(b) The term "dwelling unit" includes each sin-
gle family dwelling and each unit of a multiple unit dwelling struc-
ture designed as a separate habitation for one (1) or more occupants.
The term "dwelling unit" also includes new factory -built housing in-
stalled in accordance with Section 19950, et se q., of the Health and
Safety Code of the State of California.
(c) The term "mobile home space" includes each
space in a mobile home park designed to be used for parking a mobile
home on a temporary, semi- permanent or permanent basis.
-1-
(d) The term "school districts" includes all
school districts located in whole or in part within the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
(e) "Conditions of overcrowding" means that the
total projected enrollment of a school during the eighteen (18)
months following occupancy of the proposed development exceeds the
capacity of each school as determined by the district's reasonable
class size formulae and specific classroom use designated by the
district for the particular year of the report as defined in Sec-
tion 4 of this Ordinance. In no case shall the capacity so computed
exceed the design capacity of the school as determined by the State
Bureau of School Facilities Planning.
(f) "Reasonable methods for mitigating condi-
tions of overcrowding" shall include, but are not limited to, con-
cepts such as:
(1) Any agreement entered into by the af-
fected school district which would alleviate conditions of overcrow-
ding caused by new residential developments.
(2) The use of relocatable structures, stu-
dent transportation, and reasonable school boundary realignments.
(3) The use of available bonds or State
loan revenues to the extent authorized by law.
(4) The use of funds which could be availa-
ble from the sale of surplus school district real property and funds
available from other appropriate sources, as determined by the
governing body of the affected school districts.
(5) Agreements between a subdivider or other
developer of residential developments in the affected school district
whereby temporary use buildings will be leased to the school district
or temporary use buildings owned by the school district will be used
The developer will pay the cost of relocation of temporary buildings
owned by the school district.
(6) Elimination of non - instructional use of
classrooms.
(g) "Residential development" means a project
containing residential dwellings, including mobile homes, of one (1)
or more units or a subdivision of land for the purpose of construc-
ting or locating thereon one (1) or more residential dwelling units.
SECTION 4. Notification of Conditions of Overcrowdin The
governing body of a school district which operates, Mn whole or in
part, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, may, at any
time pursuant to Government Code Section 65971, notify the City Coun-
cil that conditions of overcrowding exist in one (1) or more atten-
dance areas within the district. Such notice of findings shall be in
writing and shall set forth the clear and convincing evidence upon
which such findings are based and shall include the reasonable mitiga-
ting solutions considered. Evidence of continued overcrowding shall
be verified for the City Council in the annual audit report as de-
��:rti.,n 11 �:hiv qr r,i u;n��•.'c.
shcrIO\ 5. Concurrence by CiLy. After receipt of any notice
of findings complying With the requirements of Section 9, the City
Council, if it concurs with such school district findings, shall do
so by rosoiution.
SECTION 6. Findings for Development Approval. Within an
attendance area, where the City Council has concurred in a school
district's notice of findings that conditions of overcrowding exist,
no decision- making body shall approve an application for a residential
development within such area and no building permit for a dwelling
unit shall be issued unless the City Council makes one (1) of the
following findings:
(a) That pursuant to this Ordinance, provision
has been made for payment of fees or some other provision has been
agreed upon by the applicant for a residential development and the
school district to mitigate the conditions of overcrowding within
that attendance area; or,
(b) That there are specific, overriding physi-
cal, economic, social, or environmental factors, which, in the judg-
ment of the decision - making body, would benefit the City,,thereby
justifying the approval of a residential development otherwise sub-
ject to the provsions of this Ordinance without requiring the pay-
ment of fees or other alternate provision required by this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. Payment of Fees. In an attendance area where the
City Council has concurred thit overcrowding exists, the applicant
of a proposed residential development, as a condition of approval,
or the obtaining of a building permit, shall pay fees, an equivalent
arrangement in lieu thereof, or do a combination thereof unless ex-
cepted as provided in Section 6, subsection (b), as determined by
the City Council during the hearings and other proceedings on speci-
fic residential development applications. Prior to the imposition
of the fees, it shall be necessary for the City Council to make the
following determination: That the interim facilities to be constructed,
leased, or rented from such fees, are consistent with the general plan.
SECTION 8. Amount of Fees and Time of Payment.
(a) When fees are required by this Ordinance, such
fees shall be $700.00 per single family dwelling unit, or $350.00'per
mobile home space or each unit of a multiple unit dwelling structure
which contains two (2) or more bedrooms. Any room designed for sleeping
which has a closet, is a bedroom for the purposes of this Ordinance.
(b) When fees are required by this Ordinance, such
fees shall be paid at the time the building permit is approved and
issued. Fees shall be held in trust by the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, until transferred to the affected school district or
districts.
SECTION 9. Refunds. If a residential development approval is
vacated or voided, and if the City still retains the fees collected
therefor, and if the applicant so requests, the City Council
-3-
shall order the fees returned to the applicant.
SECTION 10. District Schedule. Following the decision of
the City Council to require the payment of fees, the governing
body of the school district shall submit a proposed schedule in ac-
cordance with Government Code Section 65976.
Such schedule shall specify how the district will
use the fees to solve the problems of overcrowding. The schedule
shall state:
(a) The classroom facilities to be obtained;
(b) The location of the classrooms; and,
(c) The times such classrooms will be available.
If the district cannot meet the schedule, it shall submit the modi-
fications and the reasons therefor to the City Council.,
SECTION 11. Accounting. Any school district receiving funds
pursuant to this Ordinance shall maintain a separate accounting for
any fees paid and shall file a report with the City Council on the
balance of the account at the end of the previous fiscal year and
the facilities leased, purchased, or constructed during the previous
fiscal year. In addition, the report shall specify which attendance
areas will continue to be overcrowded when the fall term begins and
where conditions of overcrowding will no longer exist. Such report
shall be filed by August 1 of each year and shall be filed more fre-
quently at the request of the City Council.
SECTION 12. Use of Fees. All fees collected pursuant to
this ordinance and transferred to a school district shall be used
only by the district for the purpose of providing interim classroom,
and related facilities.
SECTION 13. Agreement for Fee Distribution. If two (2) sep-
arate school districts operate schools in an attendance area where
the City Council concurs that overcrowding conditions exist for both
school districts, the City Council will enter into an agreement with
the governing body of each school district for the purpose of deter-
mining the division of revenues from the fees levied pursuant to this
ordinance.
SECTION 14. Termination. When it is determined by the City
Council t aT t conditions of overcrowding no longer exist in an attend-
ance area, the City Council shall cease imposition of any requirements
under this ordinance.
gECTION 15. Severability. If any section, subsection, sen-
tence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any rea-
son, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
-4-
0 0
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance
and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (1) or more sections,
subsections, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
1978.
ATTEST:
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
City Clerk
-5-
Mayor of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga
9 0
NOTICE OF FINDINGS OF IMPACTION
BY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Qualification: Any school district, which has a school with an attendance
area - - or a portion thereof - - located in the incorporated area of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the governing board of the district
determine& that such school is impacted, shall be eligible to participate
in the procedures herein by filing a declaration of impaction.
Preparation of Declaration: Preparation of a declaration of impaction
by the governing board shall be accomplished in the following manner:
a. Filing of Declaration: The declaration of impaction resolution
and necessary accompanying documentation may be filed at any time
during the year, and annually thereafter. The declaration of
impaction resolution must be accompanied by the Master Plan for
location of public schools as required by the Bureau of
School Facilities of the State of California.
b. Determiniation of Impaction:
(1) Rated Capacity. The governing board shall determine the rated
capacity of any school facility it deems should be subject to
the provisions of these regulations. Such rated capacity
shall not exceed the guidelines established by the Bureau of
School Facilities of the State of California.
(2) Impaction. The governing board may determine a school to be
impacted if the total enrollment for the school, including
enrollment for proposed development(s), exceeds the rated
capacity established pursuant to subsection b (1) above.
Supportive findings shall be provided as to estimation of
enrollment.
c. Review of Options: Prior to filing a declaration of impaction to
aceivate the procedures established in the articles hereafter, it
shall be incumbent upon the governing board of the district to have
considered the reasonable methods for mitigating conditions of
overcrowding as enumerated in the Ordinance Section 3f.
d. Impaction Resolution: The declaration of impaction shall be in the
form of a resolution of the governing board of the district to the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The resolution
shall demonstrate that rated capacity has been established for the
subject school, that projected enrollment will cause the school
to be impacted, and that the governing board has exercised all
options pursuant to subsection c above that it believes are reasonable
and possible. The accompanying resolution shall set forth the clear
and convincing evidence on which such findings are based.
r •
ORDINANCE NO. 27
ON ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
I. GENERAL
SEC. 1. Definitions
(a) "Public Roadway" shall mean any public roadway, public street,
public way, public place or public highway in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, owned or maintained by the City or dedicated
to the public for the purpose of travel.
SEC. 2. Commercial Vehicle Parking
(a) It is unlawful to park or store overnight any commercial vehicle
in a residential zone, except trucks not in excess of three /fourth
tan capacity may be parked in a residential zone.
(b) It is unlawful to park or store overnight any commercial vehicle
on a public roadway.
C . .> n
r
n ATTEST:
n.
City Clerk
Mayor of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga
7G
0 41
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June I, 1978
TO: Lauren Wasserman
City Manager
FROM: Jim Robinson
Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Article 8 -- Transportation Claim
Each year the City Council must authorize the City Manager to sign the Article
8 Claim with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) in order
to receive SB 325 monies. Currently SB 325 funds are generated from 1/4 of one
percent of the sales tax in gasoline. SB 325 funds can then be utilized for
streets and roads purposes as long as transit needs of the community are reason-
ably met. Revenues are then apportioned to each City within San Bernardino
County based on their percentage of the total population of the County.
For fiscal year 1978 -79 the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive $575,335 in
SB 325 funds. Of this amount $133,856 will be claimed directly by Omnitrans.
This amount claimed by Omnitrans will provide for the continuation of the
existing fixed route service, one Dial- a-Ride sedan for the elderly and handi-
capped, and the city's share of the cost to operate two lift - equipped vans
for the handicapped confined to wheelchairs in the West End of San Bernardino
County. The remaining funds in the amount of $441,479 can be utilized for
street and road purposes in the city.
RECOMMENDATION:
I. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached
Article 8 Claim.
2. That the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the
following distribution of SB 325 funds for fiscal year 1978 -79.
a. Omnitrans $133,856
b. City of Rancho Cucamonga $441,479
$575,335
JR; ba
�ilF
GREETS AND ROADS CLAIM FORM *(See instructions on
FY 1978-79 reverse side)
A. TYPE OF CLAIM:
r+ ` Article 8, Sec 99400(a) PUC
B. CLAIMANT:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
C. COUNTY LTF:
County of San Bernardino
D. AMOUNT CLAIMED:
$441,479
F. PURPOSE:
1. (%) Local Streets and Roads
2. ( ) Bicycle /Pedestrian Facilities
PLANNING PROCESS
1. SCAG $
2. Subregional $
a. Subregional Transportation
Planning Agency: _
payments on a mon hl basis
to recipient noted in Section H.
FAYMU41 RtLIFILNI:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
- -- Claimant
Post Office Box 793 _
Mailing ddres�
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
City and Zip Code
Harry Empey, Finance Director
-- (Tttention -Name anTTIFTeT
I. CLAIM NO.
2. DATE APPROVED
3. APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
4. APPROVED FOR RESERVE
5. TOTAL ALLOCATED
6. APPROVED BY (INT.)
SCAG -TDA- 2/78 -A14
CUNU111UN Uf APPROVAL: Approval or
this claim and payment by the County
Auditor to this claimant are subject
to monies being available, and to
the provision that such monies will
be used only in accordance with the
allocation instructions.
REPRESENTATIVE / CONTACT:
SCAG IISE ONLY
Signature
Lauren Wasserman
Print or Type Name
City Manager
(Title)
9340 -A Baseline Road
Address
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
(714) 989 -1851
Phone Number)
Date Signed
I
r
i
SECTION 9. Use of Explosives
All persons engaged in felling or removing trees, and desirous of
using explosives for this purpose within the City limits, shall first
obtain approvals to use such explosives from the Community Development
Director and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department, which approval shall
be noted on the Tree Romoval Permit prior to issuance of same by the
Community Development Director. In addtition, the applicant shall
furnish such bond or insurance as shall be deemed necessary for the
protection of surrounding property from any possible damage which might
result from such activity.
SECTION 10. Protection of Existing Trees
Care shall be excercised by all individuals, developers and contractors
working near preserved trees so that no damage occurs to said trees.
Precautions to be taken shall be outlined to the Community Development
Director or an appointed representative prior to commencement of activity
and shall be subject to Community Development Director's approval.
SECTION 11. Penalty
Violation of any section of this Article shall constitute a misdemeanor,
punishable by a :ine of not more than $500 or by imprisonment not to exceed
six (6) months, or both such fine and imprisonment. Each tree removed in
violation of this Article shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 12, Ordinance Urgency
This Ordinance is hereby declared an urgency measure necessary for
the immediate protection of environmental resources in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of June 1978.
ATTEST;
City Clerk
Mayor
• Cjoa.& el.)CG,
924 WEST NINTH STREET I?
LI=- \V1 S�] O M C- S P.O. BOX 670 UPLAND, CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 91786
(714) 985 -0971
BUILDERS OF FINE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS �-
June 5, 1978
Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9340 Baseline Rand
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Subdivision Ordinance
Dear Lauren:
We have reviewed the latest draft of the Subdivision Ordinance as well
as the comments from you and the City Attorney. Basically, it is a
very well written ordinance. The only comments we have are as follows:
Kaye 17__SEC. 4.2 - Bicycle Paths - We are not necessarily 4vAi— & /o.ay/'AA —.i
against bicycle paths. However, there is a question of who /.t ,
improves them and maintains them and how they are made exclu-
sively for residents of a specific subdivision. The same
holds true for equestrian trails. 9/' ij.A.;4 a�-4-
i
Page 18, SEC_ 5_3 (a) - Reimbursements for Supplemental
Capaciy - We strongly feel that the subdivider who puts
in oversized or supplemental capacity should be reimbursed
in the amount received by the City at the time an adjacent
developer or property owner develops in the amount that
the improvement would then cost that person. In other
words, if we put in an oversized water line in 1978 and /
we do not receive reimbursement until 1985, the reimburse - jam' /� A
men[ should be based on cos[ in 1985, not in 1978 since /J MV/�AL
we will have our money tied up for that period with no � - {�
interest or return on it. �7 Ckf �
Page 20, SEC. bl _,Dwelling Units: _Health__6 Safety Items -
These items are better handled at the building permit bevel. lV &4Jias44w r
Often, the subdivider will not necessarily be the builder.
Page 21, SEC. 6_3 - Notices to Department of Real Estate -
Procedurally, it seems like it would be easier for the City
to notify the DRE as opposed to having the subdivider notify ZO
them since the City may not have control over whether the
subdivider notifies them. �• p„
Mr. Lauren M. Wassew
^' June 5, 1978
Page 2
Pie 21, SEC�6.4 - Installation of_Landscaping 6 Irrigation 11
Systems_ Assessment Districts - Often developers wait until
the project is nearly done before putting in the landscaping,
and irrigation systems. Cities generally don't plan[ trees /• �' 1 ��/f,,����
until the tract is finished and occupied and for basically usdrwf''Cr37
the same reasons, we don't install the landscaping and irri-
gation. Therefore, the developer should be allowed to bond
for these.
In addition, you may wish to add a provisioll for builders to build model���//
homes in subdivisions without doing 'a parcel
map. Some c t ow /W
builders to do this after a tent.-t ve map s approved. If the builder _ _,� /_
pasts a bond insuring that the homes will be removed at a certain time
if'a final map is not recorded within a certain Cime. ��LL
Finally, there should be some provision on larger projects that a I�'r•.
developer can get a tentative map approved for a large parcel and
then record smaller portions thereof so long as they conform to the
overall tentative map without having to bond for the entire project.
The County has such a provision. The advantage to the City on this
is that they can analyze the tentative map one time on a large piece
rather than having a developer submit 10 different tentative maps at
different times. The advantage to the developer is that it is difficult
to band large developments and this allows the developer flexibility
so that the size of the units actually recorded can conform more to
the market demand at that time. Please call us if we can provide
any other input.
Best regards, M•1
LEWIS HOMES
,
Richard A. Lewis
RAL /eg
cc: Ken Willis - BIA
auaMEaa jOTHILL FIRE DISTRI ` "'" PneveNTON
BUREAU (n ul 967.4444
Serving the Communities o/ 9(m m
Lon - Cucamonga • Eti¢anda (7141 947 -1796
P. O. Box 35 — 6627 Amethyst Street
Alto Loma, California 91701
May 31, 1978
TO: LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: EUGENE. M. BILLINGS, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED CHANGE TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
The following is this district's recommended change to the proposed
City of Rancho Cucamonga Subdivision Ordinance:
Article 2. PARCEL MAPS
Section 2.12. Improvements: Postponing Construction: Improve-
ment Security: Procedures.
Recommend adding Section (a) (8):
"All fire protection water systems, including fire hydrants,
and all fire access roads shall. be accessible, installed and
operative prior to commencing construction of any building(s)
and /or structure(s), in accordance with Foothill Fire Protec-
tion District specifications and standards."
We have been experiencing major difficulties during the past few
months with contractors and developers commencing construction and
framing prior to the installation and operation of the required fire
protection water systems and fire hydrants. The maintenance of ade-
111,ate fire department access during construction has also been a prob-
Jem. These, coupled with an increase in incendiary type fires in resi-
denti.al housing tracts under construction, present a serious fire sup-
pression problem for this fire district.
As the fire protection agency serving the city of Rancho Cucamonga, we
would strongly urge that the above recommendation be included in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga Subdivision Ordinance.
Should you have any questions reference this recommendation, or wish
to discuss this mutter further, please do not hesitate to contact
myself or Battalion Chief Benjamin Mackall, who is the Fire Marshal.
Respectfully submitted,
A
h ,e nc M. Billings
ire Chief
EMB:va
7a
1•
INTER- OFFICE MENW
DATE May 31, 1978
sir eee�enmgyo,
FROM JOHN R. SHONE PHONE 1203
Acting City Engineer\,
TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL File: 13.62.1
SUBJECT STATUS REPORT ON CURRENT YEAR ROAD PROJECTS AND PROPOSED CARRYOVERS TO FY 1978 -79
At the end of the current fiscal year on June 30, 1978, the City
will technically assume all responsibility for the street system. The
City Manager has, therefore, asked me to review the status of current
year projects for the information of the Council and outline the concept
of continued work by the County on certain projects after June 30 with
funds budgeted in FY 1977 -78 but not yet spent. In addition to the
carryover road projects, it is anticipated that a road maintenance
agreement will be entered into by the City and County providing for
continued road maintenance services by County forces on a fully reim-
bursable basis during the coming year.
Our projections show that of the $1,447,500 currently budgeted for
work within the City about $900,000 will have been spent or committed
by June 30, 1978 for the projects listed on the attached Chart 1 and
$547,500 will remain available for projects now under design. In addi-
tion, we estimate that $350,000 of reimbursements (primarily disaster
relief from State and Federal sources) will be received in the future
resulting in a total available balance of about $900,000 for the
projects on Chart 2. It is proposed that the projects on Chart 2 be
funded by the County until the carryover funds from the County's 1977-
78 Budget, plus the reimbursements, are exhausted. Our current pro-
jections indicate that all of the projects on Chart 2 can be totally
funded except for the Hellman At Foothill intersection which would be
the project earmarked for the balance of funds after all the others
are completed. Funding of that project which is not expected to be
constructed until FY 1979 -80 would include State, County and City funds.
Also attached is Chart 3 which lists projects included in the current
year Budget but will not be completed because of the disruption of the
work program due to the higher priority storm damage repair and various
other reasons. These are minor projects of secondary priority and are
recommended to the City for future funding consideration.
It is proposed that street maintenance services except for traffic
signal maintenance be furnished by County forces in the 1978 -79 fiscal
year at the same level as is currently being provided with the City
reimbursing the County for all actual costs and overhead. The estimated
cost of this work is $350,000.
Cont.
btlln "Rv. W, . . .. 71-•
0 0
Rancho Cucamonga City Council
May 31, 1919
Page 2
The City will orobably giant to undertake additional street resur-
facing and improvement projects during the year and should earmark City
funds for such projects in its upcomino budget if desired.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
It is requested that the Council indicate its concurrence with
the priority list shown on Chart 2. The Council's particular attention
is directed to the Haven Avenue traffic signal project at Chaffey College
which was not in the original County budget for this year but which is
covered by an agreement.under which the College will pay one -half of
the cost. The plans and other contract documents are complete and we
propose to seek bids immediately if the Council approves the priority
list authorizing the funding of this project from currently available
funds.
JOHN R. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
JAS: az
Attachments: Charts
0 0
WORK. TO BE CC'IPL; -_J CONT2nCT
BY JUNE 30, 197?
PROJECTS 1'1 ORIGINAL BUDGET
�,nethyst St. - Base Line N /Ilnnte Vista
Base Line - Carnelian E /Vineyard
Beryl St. - 19th ?I /Lemon
Center Ave. - Foothill N /Stratford
Cornwall Ave. " Adjacent Local Streets
East Ave. - Foothill N /Base Line
Hellman Ave. - Base Line N /19th
Hellman Ave. - 8th N /Arrow
tIaintenance
Rochester Ave. - Arrow N /Foothill
Sapphire St. - 1.25 M it /19th N /Hillside
Vineyard Ave. - 8th N /Arrow
Weed Removal
Char: 1
(Resurfacinn)
(Signals S YJ deninn lns�c)
(CHIP Sea])
(CHIP Seal)
(Resurfacina)
(W. Shoulder Pavina)
(CHIP Seal)
(CHIP Seal)
(Routine, Traffic 3 Storm Repairs)
(Shoulder 9, Berm)
(Resurface)
(CHIP Seal)
(Fire Hazard Abatement)
PROJECTS NOT IN ORIGINAL BUDGET
Beryl Ave. -
At Park Frontage N. of 19th St.
(Widening)
Carnelian St.
- Base Line /Avalon
(CHIP Seal)
Haven Ave. -
at Ent. to Chaffey College
(Traffic
Signal)
Arrow Route -
Malachite /Archibald
(Paving
Participation)
Carnelian St.
- Red Hill CC Dr /Base Line
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Grove Ave. -
at SPRR Xing
(Widen
Pavement)
Beryl St. - Banyan St. N /Manzanita
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Amethyst St.
- N. of 19th St.
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Hellman Ave.
- Arrow Rte II /Rase Line
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Hellman Ave.
- Cuc. Chan. N /Arrow Route
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Hellman Ave.
- Base Line /0.1 N H La Vine
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Sapphire St.
- S. of Vinmar
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Haven Ave. -
Deer Cr. N /Base Line
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Haven Ave. -
Victoria N /19th St.
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Carnelian St.
- At banyan
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Carnelian St.
- N. of Nilson
(Storm
Damage
Repair)
Various Roads -
(Minor
Storm
Damage)
a
0 0
CHART 2
RECD: `IENDED PROJECT PRIORIT'! LIST FOR FY 1977 - 73 CARRYOVER FUNDS
1. HAVEN AVE'!J -e - traffic signals at Chaffey Collene ^1361000
(tent. adv. June 1978)
2. RED HILL CC DR - storm dam ren at Cucamonga Channel 491000*
(tent. adv. July 1978)
3. SAN BERiNARDINO RD - traffic signals at Foothill 40,000
(tent. adv. August 1978)
4. BASE LINE - HELLMAN E /ARCHIBALD (widening) 390,000
(tent. adv. September 1978)
5. CARNELIAN ST - AVALON N /ORANGE (widening) 270,000
(tent. adv. March 1979)
6. HELLMAN AVE
- AT FOOTHILL (widening &
signals)
115,000 **
(tent.
adv. July 1979)
Estimated Total Available
Funds
$9001000
*Eligible for 100`; reimbursement providing funds for the lower priority
projects.
* *Current total estimated cost of $250,000 would be shared by State,
County and City in FY 1979 -80.
Chart 3
CURRENT YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS THAT ::i LL NOT BE ACCC'1PLISHEO
1. CERRITO ROJO (Resurface 0.15 Mi.)
2. HELUTAN AVE - ARROII N /FOOTHILL (Chip Seal)
3. HERMOSA AVE - HIGHLAND N /LEMON (Paving Particioation)
A. HIGHLAND AVE - HERMOSA E /HAVEN (Resurface)
INAR- OFFICE MEMOO
DATE May 9, 1978 , t�
FROM JOHN R. SHONE PHONE 1203
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUBJECT MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
This Item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City
Council:
Attached are 2 suggested Resolutions and location plats necessary
for the processing of the abandonment of that portion of Alpine
Street, lying between Salina Street and Tract No. 5347, shown in
yellow on said plats. The County of San Bernardino Office of
Community Development is requesting this abandonment in conjunction
with construction of a neighborhood facility.
The Resolution of Intention shall fix a time and place for hearing
persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation, which
time shall not be leas than 15 days from passage of said Resolution,
and shall be published or posted in the manner prescribed by law for
the publishing or posting of Ordinances of the City.
Attached are prints of Sections 8322 and 8323 of the Streets and
Highways Code, pertaining to posting procedures and filing the Order
of Vacation.
Upon completion of the hearing, the Resolution Ordering Vacation
should be completed and filed with the County Recorder.
It is requested that you submit the bill for advertising coats to
the Office of Community Development, 1111 E. Mill Street, Bldg. 1,
San Bernardino, CA 92415, Attn: Mr. Walter 0. Wells.
HHN R. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
WLT:js
Enclosures: as noted
cc: Walter Wells - Office of Community Development
Real Property Division - Thomas B. Sharpe
hm L_�- C/T'Y ,Jf `;!'N (i: h % ✓ir/ElJii;/O %h(S�iN[i ✓i ✓ / /GNi /ice /l,Ei� ✓✓ /:/O T%�6`
LLTAL ADVERTISEMENT l LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT I Thurs.. Dec. 19, 1974 THE SUN•TELEGRAM -Ae23
ai a] feet Inns ah.R In. north ra -_ _ - _ - t _ - -. _ -
1me of vs. N1¢hwar Jls m +5?a't.`.harara vY.�1ik :Ymw.�lt 5banelu elfnalon¢e : :aa North titl11 i LEGAL A111' EN'1'ISISDIENT I LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
'OhueXlerlI n'rrvhan v rinv.a Iv Hn.k E9'3l. V +Nea 110 Innru::h Alarallall 11 „ulevelrl lnuln 0.:I 11'%x- -
ann nr, t+ncev In as ;x.:nl 11!. Invlrlar\e. O(nlul Ilft'nrrly ut 11' il" (feat X :;:dance ^f 1916 ..14 4-1 k :sat X th,l:lnce a1 b5ahloolna11 son uflrvc e\rCm[e n
c, uet X sin each, IIn In 1 IM ,11.e Co mi+: "'suo n as (^Ilnw . h." t Inlet erlr +l i,dh a fell, he a ^:a alone he trial IL.:rI^. For !ur IIe pal
lee ltd n!^N<n 11.11 Un! tt_ then e The F "a rrlr 5 UII (eel Inerl.11' {,,,1 r111M1'nr ,11 l IenYry I I [ t v e Ilrlllare r Vr "ryrnr[I V
soon r IIn of p, the cloth, h> ofd! hr a ,a :,fl l ?:W In nl IIIe nrt r Ied pu V
Ce 1.I+llaDtr,e 1... a V�r, lone h'$n er1Y 1 M+rin% a Inn v Onla.n nl l:! wu ho. 1 Irv. \IhvolAhl 1+1 IFIr or , :v(e1 anq
IrR IB r'ionW e,t r: atop': �I R.ofY %Iry .11'- •I'tall +I..!]1X Io tiv r +illif
cepPni Looefro all c-111l Inn ^( In eel No. If Inv rtes ribs,( 1111Fen 1.11 be. Violin 5l lrlrr. ll, +iM1e TIJIIYIII'IIINT 111 k' ry'n Jilu l.Ippn. r�l N^. MLer IIR
ennea.':nled puahrv..... da. alo -I Urn.'rof(imne1 onall..n 5:' \1 .l InrnaRn rrvnlra' IIH;INNIVI; 1 M1e .onllmll 19 hill. ".I Ifin.. on 01, at,., el IM
SECTION Fill. "IV.., IM + lent ]tar :e. final. 1, In, 11 .1- rn %le' ^I ll rneR. J]' rn x nl"On'" k. +aIrv11Y .non% 1 <.1 Ih1 Lilt ll` 11.'rk ..l e:.ln tl '
rd ne atw.e So n Ihmk' P111, 'r( un L.e Ine .n a +� I I SECT ION i I , the ary
In reps ,, ^ne[acnrn - e r .olhuO w OH-It torn aloes IIn Yo {Ia n:Iele n I o'1II' ...... Ir :N -11, e] II Fn r o` 1 J :t of S he -
Sert a Area \n in aon the nl h.� of aaln L'nn min M nl. oll(plat lret thl ew h"' n {5'a,lU�' 14rooli rellrlu lac h'r, fo ten I ,.
F:r ,.II [n > u \n t anXlea l n n m 1 nClry a( MIc In' a u( V'a V. eM
t [ N F.RFDI't^CF.NTIFI'` Ina( naX. [lnerlvn of alnex ! hI.R1'ahall Nnulnv NI INn'InrP ant. " 'v l,,t r 151n . r.' hY in. Y Street
�fn no"'a nrf.:nnme a nut115v f1r {In:hnnne of 51 a: aNI.I" S1" F :a,f a Ih,to-c of off. 5ry v_ 4:a,µh n•.l',lto.. In de11. p :. tot vA ;I1 .1 rill at 11 -aMCrn M" rhea, a'La t'.0 tde nea Nor a.<I 11oIr ,he r 1tt11ERI.Ol Il:lt','IF1 Thal the
C..on C :I c re -'W F'a n e IaLn o Inn Ihaprr �el anrX •,(`la Y Xnn polls. m% l.. . ul
armn arllnr den a c.:lar llhr Vlve nl nTta ! Nn. lJ in, need a nh I 1 rr 110 o n pn,'plrn 1v . AI n, n.l ! :'II
o aI e'dr °n thry orders rn RnM1 99 nlrNaVa. Pa %ea Iner n Nnrinv (Nl irle4 }' tN'11, <nlrn 1 nn I:I :1n %rnl Hr..l1 t I t l'II M a X Best
tt 1nf Ue.i -.der 11:1. nr lee ann 13. rernrna nt aa1., Cnu ride, n:v 1 2l I : ftt (rin .1 :hr ton .Ili aXJ1l II' at' S¢: rnlmn . nr rd aI,Rl.,a,
I lina.lee „ v ll{:XC'F.PTI ea Ins r('on 1^W[IVnr -'S .Ilnw tr nlncl ref: Inrn anl.n 1nf I]:l I1 let .nR ' nnf o'ull.lr r In, S11t
A`FS: Cn rlpnrn- ^'a 'n, Inem !n Iie(1 Xfall v olds ,Id rWnallfln hnr of 1n,1^n ¢ha r1 rat e „ inertial f [(,"nor, 1471. nY IM
5 Wh 'er. Xalnoa. Hunha , (re Rnry'. IInRECINNI,VC.e at Xald Southwest p .' 1 aIIII IMrI need ado a 117( 119" a dl,lnn.f n� S II W len:f1� (.rllnwn ¢volt,
t Lark,,, IN1 .lhm.'e Nnrlh nt Ma•. 29 K1 Al'} :S: ('n.rn.'r1.1 o" ('aln pn..,
N(]F.5' Snne rvr of 'Parcel Nn. 1": Innnr< niln lal nep 1]' ql" WLI q n tllaloner of J w Fri r the TRUE; Ka lnna. Nnn,nq Cnenp. Larkne!
1 All ENS- Cnunellman Nammne4 along said Culol) Ime of 1d111<. n :adnce nl 1M (eel to the POINT: pCINT OF BEf INNING. ROES: 4.,no
LCCILI,F CO)ORTN \I...c n DNVe Soule easterly alm.'Or BRGINNINIC Id1 RYCINN1Nf: al In. Inleraet -: A 1 1. 1. 1'u...th. n While,
,
e CI[r Clerk the ar< n( • atlas nrw ILI BP.GR1NINf. al Ilre Nnrthw<+0 uan if said NnrineaY Ine of Mrti f Vin nark
Tee a n1 rnrnan.'e Ia nr eyl Sn :,InweaterlY Ilomc an lnllla 1i \romee n( due Teael No. iiJa, Halt. shall Raulerarn a In, Y.aaleilY I.Ii Cl1.1. Y. ( :O!'OIITH,
( approved 1Ma IMIr naY n! drember,' Ian[ent Ihe, bean South 1. de.' turns, also whit Ihe Inlervcllonl line of 1 In I.n11c Mnunuln DrIc.l lily Clerk
519.1 al Jt" F.nt well( ndlpa f at the Hachette line of IM Ml thence is or, aald Easier, ]:he 11 (SEAL.
W R. HOLCOMB. 1441 to rest through a enlral ape fnnt Ids pomon of Marshall• LNIe Mmmu:n Hric! North M deg I Tne lar,l,n a .anti nn I...,an)
paler of in. : ^I M ll. 53' Y" a dinIana nfl 8ntdevard a. shown a nl pat ]Y la" War a thi anre oI ].ail pp wed this thin it., On Onclmb•I.
! CIIY Of San Bernard,. ]t.49a erne( to A yVlf In to aMl of Tuef Nn. 1744 and Dle centerllnei feet to an lnterari non wnh a n - 19144.
y AporovN Ise In farm- :OI n nleraecling u ! cancavel of Little Mannti :o Odes as he finMnt nave com'ave Norl!IeaalealY - II NOI.COMR
RALPN N. PR3NCE invineaal<elY weld a iitlrYa a( SOW .+ a ra described la hat start: force a • o! iU pv (eel: tnent'e N:U.r: of In,
C1tY Alm;neY lee[: dens SovlMOter �tlm[ u.l of f e In, Islanders NnvemMf N.'.1... Inem ^a! Ine lab n t t d, LIU of San Herl O d I'.
of sale lnteraec[Ini a fmm 1'187 a1 Inelrument No SA In Be,k c e frvm a 1 1 t e t old ApP' ^t'ed a In food'
III
I. initial un/mt Nag Clan Sou :h repo. Pager Ito through 1121 near' North 4'J nep 4i °�tl� We [
RALPN IL PNI[:CE
T de R. 4P' 11" Weal through allnrlualve, Olilrlal not.ma .1 an:rl'In 'high a renlnal :rnQln n( 1f drR
Cl1Y Ah. ry
central angle of 41 del IT Sf "1 (tnunlU: ihente along amn Northerly :21' 15" a nnlanrt nl Paid feel
of 1119 fttt to a pomp f Mfee PonlwaOf Nunh la a "',I ul t (orate along FICTITIOUS
B N A M 9
tpllsla", ems
Nnar l a npe(a ra141n1nr1 rIr
heca rated a Norin.he....
E51NESS
If I. nl JP i. tat to a set..... 3
rimm
FIL ETNO. FBN IIMS
said ehacall Ise Nu oI PWiW u m- mngent e e Non dManl and N»tctl)' Imes•..(
ra eatl{u1
Tor Inlio-11 -.1n, a IN,,
fee[ form Inlnal anRenl mull lnee+lenY navinR of ID.al I.IIIIe Mmnu.Iln f n111 uJ rev
ee. n Nrrlu In del. 18' ro- w. -u 1et.l. men a Sanlhoi ear mnnR me 21 1)- k: +,l ar.L; I: r i
al•
•:,u;' Iin1 tattle III.
wlln ndluf oe Ab of (eel ineorl6 n'aw of the last mrailroad Ono. "" 1 a pant 11 ,aI l�Noli ln.ilY Ill
�illorltv�r. nrlio
enlral angle 1' OI tlr'R. Ia'I1.1nRent from Inru.11 11ne 111 M :11 :n,111 Iloldrt.nrl. Itlrrue
rl
F1111.1 W J1.h11,nn
M "ca drftlane< pl N.M Ittl W: hanged( thaltYth n South 66 deg. ^I " "R r:ml I hv11, It 111 11.11
111 I' v1 V11. 11
a1'ori1nIe y
Wealerl lun¢alron 3C M- F al uncoil, rrnlrnl'doll IIn111vv :1111 No1lh al 1,R-
a,
111 :111n, CAVI !.23ld
nt mI - In-- Nna ar said 1 nerp, angle of ]l 1. . 19" a dlatnnrai il" e " 1u.f.ln.e of 511n (v_1'
Na 1 ". lnmtt IrmR std WealerlY It dJ feet lu v pnlnl at erlep: lu the 11111 Y'1' I"' ItF1 :I NNIN( :.
Revs O)' Jont '
ill k: ann' S
In
tllal ms last m - lnrnve felt a 11nr parallel „1 n Snll'IUN ] "1'n.11 n. .1.11.1 soil.
i
111.1Iro 1'.111 11.1:
IIuV2(allan
ants t ve Narm i9 tlel le' o and l of brl dulanl. sold meanmmL Coal" Iv1uu1 v! hnr Illy ul
udlalanee
r
t'11u nnanrv,e , nneurled 1•Yl
East f 5W lal to t Bald 1
Mnth a n in nn.utll nn, m
nip 1he.e:
Ilnanand A
of Marsh ll Ht
Tge the PO1L...I EGINNINO. nor v( Marshall IHntle. rd ion nt art
Stn :h ennvr dlo "ILto
'
A \l'l: Sln.a
41
PAR Norla ] 1 --ea
.l so Ji' ai" West a dlrlanre, -.n I x^elrai IO Us late rl ....... an',
The ann In I.
Old.Y ).of lest of ne1o1 ]9W pep to a m11n1 f wll 'rr,
vl( :YF :I
Il nYlllµ
r, lr,,, cuL1,.l;a'
Slid W fen wide. ! Mano+lll refill of Mnuntaln 11.rll Ins me'Xnect Vp lvllun dLL U[,'I ;;
eir "'ON
1111,..... vr , fllrn xph ma
llflyn
Be ward In me tlly f San P<+ "•Mtn Vn1nl G'an IM1ercnn Nnnn: MrrtRl Dr, lvvrn 9. Ful J, of 1pr Cnnnf`
Choi heVe
aPeraardmn,i
Flrrkr Rernvdme
naMmo, Coolly nt Sm he del ]s' 1]" West and 11 dlTanf r n and Iitsnuara Cwle n: Ulan,
n "I nnoth I In 1171.
a( Cinoc nli. er Mft m'TMI l-, Imm Inr Inlen....Onl Slafern Callhnml.. ,1111
th flat al laid Tract No. 7744 jinermf kn fns tenlerlln. nl 1 SX(TIDN ]. Thal . hnur a!
CEPTIFICa, 0
1nerrin r rah ;na1 u.Inn[rlr(
EXCC1eTIN0 TNEflEPROM Ine hta „:Hall MAnulrvarn: Inenrr alnna; 191 A 1S. nn tar fim r ar n! la a run rr rr rvn n nt nnpnal
1o11n W
gm c- p+rtela: sat an rh.' n( IJtlle Mnuntaln '+op'a'l• Ilia, 1n 1h ('non, Ill ' naln - 11n 1111 1n 1, ., :; . r
la) AEGINNINfi t ne Intros!'- Dnvr Nnrin M def- 35' Il" WvI'M'r nl In. L'11r I(.a 11. - 1 A'r -.
V. D4.NNI.c \t'Al:lll.l'n
chat f the North Ilne f aid If dnlmre of JOn lest In ins POINT nardlnn, CaLforma, 11 -and :nr
......
Marshall Mule rd and fh OF AEGINN(NO a hr' 1, haon a Inr 11n
e'mnu,
u1
amrr .I:ndcr
Westerly Ilse O(a Ina( ro ante l; 111 COMMENCING at Id Non anrll pi Ilerlxam odor. all n [�rn..11
n
demnbed In M field c ded Oe. Ihwent corn of Tort Nn_ F, cons 1 nM 1a nnr...nn. �m DATED I]'r In. off
Inner J1. IM7 as Inal'u rot SO. 1`Inl al C ind N IhrrI, 11 :iM1e 111 1 none
, ,11f. 1 at I ad
PIi In Pmt f91e_Pa¢erinlio and• MarnallnAnl rd Nrn1h 61 rl.¢, to aidaIfal. �ol
, 11rva 1 me 1h. n n'_._ 'nlnm.xl
FIPIRI :S Ilu 11.....
•
1 IIII
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
0
RISOLUrtax NO.
A RFSOLUTT07 OF TIE MAYOR A'sD t5D00H COUNCIL 07 THE CITY OF SAN BE4NARDINO
DECLARING ITS INTE.WIal TO ORDRR THE VACATIO1 OF A PORTION OF CITRUS STREET.
NEST OF VICTORIA AVM'Z. NEST TO TBE VEST LM OF WE SAN BERNARDINO CCUNT'T
FLOOD CO:1Ml10L DISTRICT CDAN:,rL AND RESERVING PUBLIC TITILITr EASMIENTS THEREON.
BE IT RESOLVED BY TIM NATOE AND COW". COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF SAN
BERNAEDINO AS FOLLOVSt
SECTI03 1. That the Mayor and Cocoon Council of the City of San Berm -
ardlno hereby declares its intention to order the vacation of a portion of
Citrus Street vest of Victoria Avenue, wet to the vent line of the Sam
Bernardino County Flood Control District Channel, Inc amid City, which said
portion more particularly Is described as follows
.. .-That partim of= citsur street,(E2.30 feet" i
Of ups, pegs , records of Cho Conaty !recorder, County of
13 San Bernardino, State of California, daseribed as follow:
14 Beglaniag at the Northeast corner of Lot 6, Block 12 of said Nest
Hifhlands Tract, amid point also being, tha lnternoction of the
South Liss of said Citrus Street end the Neat line of Victoria Avenue
15 as slw delineated an said cap of Nowt INighlands; thttoe^_ Borth
16 along, amid Wot line 82.50 feet to its intersection with the North
Ilan of said Citrus Street; thence Vent along said North title to its
17 intersection with the Northerly prolon n gatio of the Neat 11 -no of
said Wt 6; thence South along said Northerly prolongation to its inter
18 section, with the South lino of said Citrus Street; themes goat along
amid South line, a distance of 462 feet were or loss to the point of
beginning.
".r ...... . -. _... - 1 ......_.....___e --- City
20 SRCTIOII 2. 7heC the or anA Caron Wnmcil of the C1 of Sao Bern-
ardino, in vacating the above described portion of said street, elects to pro_
21
22 teed under and is accordance with the provisions of the "Strost Vacntlon Act
23 of 1941 ", being Division 9. Part 9, of the Strents and Dighvays We of the
State of California.
24
SECTIO111 3. That the hour of 9:90 A.N., on the 16th of Nay, 1977, in
25
the Council Chamber of the City tall, San Bernardinot California, ban and the
26
27
snme hereby is fixed as the tine and place when and whore all persons inter -
asted In or objectine to the proposed vacation my appear before the said
28
Pryor and Comm Council and offer evldenco in relatloa thereto. For fatthor
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
.19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m
Particular* as to the proposed vacation of the harefabefore described portion
Of said ettesty reference is us" to that certain mp marked 'Plan No. 5015"
approved February 21, 1977, on file In the office of the City Clark of said
City. ...- . __ . ._
SECTION 4. Nothing In this Resolution *hall In any my affect or
disturb any existing essesents for sanitary @ewer sad appurtenant facilities
and for public utility purposes belonging either to the City of San Bernardino
or to any public utility and then 1@ hereby reserved for future general
Public utility purpose and for this City an tenement reasonably necessary
to locate such sanitary saver and public utility facilities over, in, under,
pair• replace or renew each facilities.
UM021 7. That On ClWEsgiessrrof the City of San Bernardino hereby
is dimeted to Cause Notices of Street Vacation to be posted as required by th
Street Vacation Mt. of 1941.
I BEHEST CMTIPT that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by Lie
Mayor and faessm Cm ncil of the City of San Borardfuo at a
weetiog thereof hold on the day of
7
-••- y1977, by the following vote, to-wit: - -•
STE& Councilmen
NOSE
ADS1BRi
City Clark
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
n
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
Sba foregoing resolutim to hereby approved tbie
dq of 1977
mayor of the City of San Batoardim
Approved as to font
City Attorney ...
State of California )
County of San Bernardino) SS
City of San Bernardino ) '
I do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
in a full, true and correct copy of that now on file in this office.
IN HIVIESS MIERLOP, I have hereunto set my hand and of �fred the
Beal of the City of San Bernardino, this day of
, 1977.
Clerk
0 0
j A7i'IPG E � F�� �El�' / ✓f1P(/"�iJJ CO J /��ti
LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
fF,NNOMF Oi fFOfgFO
OONNIFM Of MNNNFAY
Y
1
f
IMMF Of MOIOSFO
MINOOMMFNT Of NM:NW�Y
1
This Item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City
Council:
Attached are 2 suggested Resolutions and location plats necessary
for the processing of the abandonment of that portion of Alpine
Street, lying between Salina Street and Tract No. 5347, shown in
yellow an said plats. The County of San Bernardino Office of
Community Development is requesting this abandonment in conjunction
with construction of a neighborhood facility.
The Resolution of Intention shall fix a time and place for hearing
persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation, which
time shall not be lees than 15 days from passage of said Resolution,
and shall be published or posted in the manner prescribed by law for
the publishing or posting of Ordinances of the City.
Attached are prints of Sections 8322 and 8323 of the Streets and
Highways Code, pertaining to posting procedures and filing the Order
of Vacation.
Upon completion of the hearing, the Resolution Ordering Vacation
should be completed and filed with the County Recorder.
It is requested that you submit the bill for advertising costa to
the Office of Community Development, 1111 E. Mill Street, Bldg. 1,
San Bernardino, CA 92415, Attn: Mr. Walter 0, Wells,
7
HN F. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
WLT:js
Enclosures: as noted
cc: Walter Wells - Office of Community Development
Real Property Division - Thomas B. Sharpe
AR- OFFICE MEMO
a
DATE
May 9, 1978
.�
FROM
JOHN R. SHONE PHONE 1203
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
TO
LAUREN WASSERMAN, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUBJECT
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
This Item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City
Council:
Attached are 2 suggested Resolutions and location plats necessary
for the processing of the abandonment of that portion of Alpine
Street, lying between Salina Street and Tract No. 5347, shown in
yellow an said plats. The County of San Bernardino Office of
Community Development is requesting this abandonment in conjunction
with construction of a neighborhood facility.
The Resolution of Intention shall fix a time and place for hearing
persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation, which
time shall not be lees than 15 days from passage of said Resolution,
and shall be published or posted in the manner prescribed by law for
the publishing or posting of Ordinances of the City.
Attached are prints of Sections 8322 and 8323 of the Streets and
Highways Code, pertaining to posting procedures and filing the Order
of Vacation.
Upon completion of the hearing, the Resolution Ordering Vacation
should be completed and filed with the County Recorder.
It is requested that you submit the bill for advertising costa to
the Office of Community Development, 1111 E. Mill Street, Bldg. 1,
San Bernardino, CA 92415, Attn: Mr. Walter 0, Wells,
7
HN F. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
WLT:js
Enclosures: as noted
cc: Walter Wells - Office of Community Development
Real Property Division - Thomas B. Sharpe
By previous transmittal, I have forwarded to you the proposed
resolution documents for the abandonment of the subject street
in relation to the Cucamonga .Neighborhood Facility.
In review of this matter, recommendation has been made to con-
struct a 6 -foot masonry wall along the easterly boundary line
of the Neighborhood Facility.
It is suggested that you may desire to advise the City officialdom
of this recommendation so that they may make it a part of the
abandonment action; or that they may desire to make it a require-
ment as a part of the actual building project.
This recommendation Was tended on the part of the County Planning
Department and, thus, is being relayed to you for your consideration.
11LT:pn
12 136 1.000 u,.
WILLARD L. THOMAS
Right of Way Coordinator
INTR- OFFICE MEM040
DATE
May 17, 1978
u'. t�wiso 7
J
FROM
Transportation Department PHONE 1902
1'• °•-"
Right of Way Section
TO
John R. Shone
Director of Transportation
SUBJECT
PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF ALPINE STREET - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PROPOSED CUCAMONGA NEIGHBORHOOD FACILITY
By previous transmittal, I have forwarded to you the proposed
resolution documents for the abandonment of the subject street
in relation to the Cucamonga .Neighborhood Facility.
In review of this matter, recommendation has been made to con-
struct a 6 -foot masonry wall along the easterly boundary line
of the Neighborhood Facility.
It is suggested that you may desire to advise the City officialdom
of this recommendation so that they may make it a part of the
abandonment action; or that they may desire to make it a require-
ment as a part of the actual building project.
This recommendation Was tended on the part of the County Planning
Department and, thus, is being relayed to you for your consideration.
11LT:pn
12 136 1.000 u,.
WILLARD L. THOMAS
Right of Way Coordinator
:cold e c,/ �i � ��'.l" 5
1 RESOLUTION NO.
i
2 gESOLUTI0I1 OP TUE CITY OF SAN BYTMA 00 ORDERLYG T!!E VACATION OF i
A PORTION OF CITRUS STREET. WEST OF VICTORIA AVft!UE, WEST TO THE WEST LINE
3 OF THE SA11 REAL ;AP.DL` o COUNTY FLOOD CWITROL DISTRICT C;!ANNEL IN TUE CITY }
OF SAN BERNARDINO AND RESERVD'.G PUBLIC UTILITY EASEt1CTTS 171E1tEII1.
4
HE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COtR!Otl COU;ICIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
5 BERNARDINO AS FOLL06151
6 SECTION 1. The Mayor and Coon Council of the City of San ;
j Bernardino, having heard the evidence offered in relation to the proposed
g vacation of that portion of Citrus Street lying West of Victoria Avenue.
9
Westerly to the Went line of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District
10 Channel, core particularly described in the City Resolution of Intnntlon
Po. 12752, hernby. £lad irw:�11 of Uns. evidence submitted that such portion _
13 __.._ _
12 of nand Citrus street propweau a.. — -_ _, __ - - - - --
13 uanccesoary for present or prospective public street purposes.
14 SECTION. 2. The Mayor and Common Council of said City do hereby
15 order the vacation of that portion of Citrus Street lying West of Victoria
16 Avenue, Weaterly to the Rest line of the San Bernardino County Flood Control
17 District Chanel, San Bernardino, California, more particularly described
18 an follows:.
19 T!ut portion of Citrus Street (82.50 feet wide) as delineated
on the !Sap of Rest 1ii;!lnlands, as per plat thereof recorded In
20 Book 5 of Napo, pnge 77, Records of the County Recorder, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows:
21 Beginning at the Northeast:- corner of Lot 6. Block 12 of said
22 West !ilghlanda Trnctt said point also being the intersection
of the South line of said Citron Street and the West line of
23 Victoria Avenue no also delineated on said map of West Highlands;
thence North along said Nest line 82.50 feet to its intersection
24 with the North line of said Citrus Street; thence Went along said
North line to its intersection with the Northerly prolongation
25 of the West line of said Lot 6; thane South along said Northerly
prolongation to its intersection with the South line of said
26 Citrus Street; thence Cast along said South line, a distance of
462 feet note or lean to the point of beginning.
27 And no also described in 'laid Resolution 110. 12752.
28 SE/CCCIOU 1. This Resolution shall reserve. and nothing herein shall
f' „tfiG
r
f
2
3
4
S
6
7
S
9
IO
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
in any way affect or disturb, each and every existing casement for sanitary
sewer and appurtenant i facilities and for public utility purposes belonging
either to the City of San Bernardino or to any public utility and there is
further reserved for present and future'general public utility purposes and
for this City an easement reasonably necessary to locate sanitary sewer,
public utility and appurtenant facilities over, in, under or across all of
the real property described hereinbefore along with the right to use, install,
maintain, repair, replace or renew such facilities and those reserved by
Resolution of Intention No. 12752
SECTION 4. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall
'cause a certified -oopj- � seaolui;16ijtq b„ a iemrded in the office of the
County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Mayor and CoAmmon Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
l� eating thereof held on the a?� -y'
d / of 19770 ,bbyy/ the following vote, to-wit,
AYES: Councilmen
NOES.
ABSEN^
LUCILLE GOFORTII
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day of /1� . 1977.
W, R. HC)L�.OIAB
Mayor of the City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form:
t1ALVII II. PRINCIB
City Attorney
I
• I State of California )
2 County of San Bernardino) SS
City of San Bernardino )
3 I do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
4 is a full, true and correct copy of that now on file in this office,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
5 seal of the City of San Bernardino, this day of
6 . 1977.
7
8 'City Clerk
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
... _._...� 20 ..
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
F-1
LA
cs)
a►
05
Anc4.
Par Cucamonga Fruit Lands M.S. 419
AQEA TO 6E
F-- ee.uco
Por. S. W. Sec. I I, T. IS., R.7 W;SAB.&M.
4'*es5w.5 map
�lk.
Gucatnow m-04
Sr^0Lrl'7'
V,4e-,47-Z0A-'
OVO-
12/14/m w
rax Code Area
6706
20
29
31
32
ARROW
RourER
ws
7P I N IE ST.
21
NA ST.
C8
4 04
or 36
cs)
a►
05
Anc4.
Par Cucamonga Fruit Lands M.S. 419
AQEA TO 6E
F-- ee.uco
4'*es5w.5 map
�lk.
1 2-1$-. EA
Note-Assessor's a Lot Book 209 Page 04
wove "
10mbers, Shown in circles Son Swnardino Comfy
12/14/m w
§8322 CDANc£ of GRAnR AND VACATION fDiv 9, Pt3
this part shall be expressed in its ordinance or resolution of intention
to order ally Vacation.
LrM.M.ATIVE HISTORY
t. Addrd be Sta In IN ell 230 § 1 p 1339.
2. Auu•nl,d by S:nfs IID9 eh 624 11 P 2005, vddi., nor leanledioo^ after
"ordinavee."
COLLATERAL REFERENCES
Col Jur 2d Iligtways mad Sheets § 150.
NOTES OF
In .,find he ,;tr to 11'11 d. rvndnule
f-
al , 1wW ali,g•.i to I, puldie strut
..d to eni.'in them form oe<u"lug
at aAr_ aueh h"..1. <if, Ind land'o
of proving invalidity of rnNntion
DECISIONS
da.ing melt, and an pmrenptlaa.
v. , favor of rnlidily nr ardiann,e
of iNOntso.l. 1.11M, nod Anne el re,i.
National Va-I v Dual., (1948) 96 CA
"d 390, 194 1'2d -As.
6 8322. Same: Contents of ordinance or resolution: Notices:
Inclusion of one or more streets. P.rrore the ,,ration it any street
or part thereof is ordered, the city enaneil shall pass ;m ordinaner
or resolution le,Taring its intontion In to so, referring to the street
or part thereof by its Inavrul or ofli, inl liable or [lie naine by which it
is ronunauly hnomn and referring to a .tap or plan oil file in the
office of the rile chill for particulars as to the proposed Vacation
The ordinaner or resnhttinb of intenlion ,ball Rx a iinlr and plan
for hrurinF all persons interested in or objecting to the Proposed
Varnlion, 11l2111 lime (hall be not less than 15 days fl-on the date
of the passage of the ordinaner or resolution, still shall he jail)U l 1
or posted in the m:nmer prescribed by Ian• for the publi.hin^ ar
posting of orlinnn,.•� of the rite. Notices of street vacation ,lintl
• be pnm•d eo t nspirno u.l, along she line of the Mri et nr ,.it tb rr.nf
proposed
to vm•aled ;It least Ill days hefare the dale sal for
hearing. Filch nnlir „s shall he posted not mare tlmn WO reel apart.
but at leave three shall be pnsled. Snell notices shall slate the
passage of the oralimmnee or resolution or intention and the time amt
place of the hewing.
One or nrnre starts, or parts thereof, whether cmuhmnons or ono
may be included and vacated under the same ordinance or resolllion
of iutention.
LEOINLATIVE HISTORY
I. Addrd i;v Slnb 1941 eh 250 § 1 p 1359.
2. A...1n1..1 by FIA, 1913 It 1-_”, § i 1. 1961, (1) old-, "or part therrnf'
nfb •'a i•,,,a the I i a a of the a in, I, ,. the nar,I erntcn , lid (2) wd"libfug
..n..n G or' for :Nil M1.. thy, fn „rt1 :
3. A,nrn.IM by Sl:dn 1919 ch tae ,.§ I „1, 211n, nbling "at Iran ten da.s
before the dale set far hnninga nt Ihr cad of 11.1 third senlenen.
4. Amended by State 19 :0 eb 621 12 p 2605, adding ear rcashilanin after
'ordinance” thmaglmut the section.
COLLATERAL REFERENCES
Cal Jur 2.l'Ri ;bw.vn and Strait. :156.
ch 21 VACA'rIUV VF CITY ISTREEIN § 8323
,,not turns:
Ai.h 160 (neeesity for adhering
to atrinaory procedure prescribed for
Ira
,..loon or discauliuuvvice of street or highway).
NOTES OF DECISIONS
All prrn ^mrtionn nor In favor of the
ntrretn incident to eanntrtatiov atfree-
of Jin nrdinanaa or intro.
way wan n -I raid beenazn at failure
.,Iela,
.n 1. vil—le .1 lit n•et. Nati ... I lily
to comply with requirenmuta of notice,
, lonlop (1949) MG CA2d 38a, 191 P
lid I
OPpOrtu"ay to ?.1 n
t1 :.M.
ape".6e t , Opening Ac[ of
F_11 lhm,gh tier superintendent of
1999 or Street Vacation Act of 1941,
.t rein and the city er.gin r tntify
!ace power to provide by agreement
:1 ..:u notice. ter not posted, the arc
for dosing of Worts i cidcnt to con
,ol ones "Ihnt Oil' is] daty bm ueen
*traction a free:.ay is provided by
.Marl, performed" and "tlut lire
§'N.!, authorizing Delornn,.t of
tr, by her,, obeyed" in themselves
Public Works to enter into og —meat
•nalita" .,,1116, t evidence to 'up.
with city ail lid, Pun ant to
art a fndiug of proper pooling, w1.1, a
nob ogre mn, to e1,rar any n11et at
�a :II not he di>Lrthe,l span appeal.
or near it to le—)it ion with any free.
'.:Jmmd fit v Damlop (lots) s6 CA
and at requiring f ^rm.lilio of
: 13.a. 191 Pod 189.
all r ads. Armen v Oakland (1960)
ncil r alntian .111^0-6
city a a �.
183 CA2d 137, 6 Cal Rptr
.alma ant wilh ,talc to done certain
F 8323. Hearing: Order of vacation. The city council shall, on
d.r day fixed for the hearing, or on the day to vAhirh the hearing
le postponed or cautioned, hear the evidence offered by any person
interested. It the city cooneil finds, from all tier evidence sub-
mitted, that any street or part thereof, described in the ordinance or
donation of iutention, is unnecessary for present or prospective
public street purposes, the city council may make its order vacating
'nch street or part thereof.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
1. Added by Slate 1441 al. 250 § 1 p 1359.
2. Amended by Statn 19:9 eh G24 13 It 2606, adding "or resolution^ after
nldillauce e
COLLATERAL REFERENCES
cal .Err "_d Iti.hw.rn.od Sinai. 1 IN.
Mdiim,ryl Cal Ili, St... 1, 921.
.Am Jurlllgho:ay.(tat d§t."1).
NOTES Or DECISIONS
A oily a norril i net prohibited
oo
ln to a rrlmrl In' the pohlie
n. wee o l pn eedo" for
.. ;,; or 1 +9i1,a far Ile,
•m,an of .11 e e n tho.gla
-Port tort r 'ed feiln to allow of
G,mmlvely tbal tba property as which
the .station w a ra,eamed was e
11— needed for s .beat ar for .
prnnpoetive use as a effect. I.ne Anga-
city eannell resolution approving
a ",licnt coati stale In clone certnia
.ire,ia a e
ti -hoe to mimelion of
o
frwsy ,. not void brem.e of fail,
noticr la mplr will, rrqui ebb of
e,
notice, to protleab and
hearing specified by Street Op�hing
Act of 19.9 or Street Vacation Act of
1911, sine. power to provide I., .area
eat far closing at streets boidoal to
BITER- OFFICE MEMO
DATE May 9, 1978 �, � - e�
FROM JOHN R. SHONE PHONE 1203 __/,'
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUBJECT MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
This Item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City
Council:
Attached are 2 suggested Resolutions and location plats necessary
for the processing of the abandonment of that portion of Alpine
Street, lying between Salina Street and Tract No. 5347, shorn in
yellow on said plate. The County of San Bernardino Office of
Comity Development is requesting this abandonment in conjunction
with construction of a neighborhood facility.
The Resolution of Intention shall fix a time and place for hearing
persona interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation, which
time shall not be less than 15 days from passage of said Resolution,
and shall be published or posted in the manner prescribed by law for
the publishing or posting of Ordinances of the City.
Attached are prints of Sections 8322 and 8323 of the Streets and
Highways Code, pertaining to posting procedures and filing the Order
of Vacation.
Upon completion of the hearing, the Resolution Ordering Vacation
should be completed and filed with the County Recorder.
It is requested that you submit the bill for advertising costs to
the Office of Community Development, 1111 E. Mill Street, Bldg, 1,
San Bernardino, CA 92415, Attn: Mr. Walter 0. Wells.
Lrl
IN . SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
WLT:js
Enclosures: as noted
cc: Walter Wells - Office of Community Development
Reel Property Division - Thomas B. Sharpe
fit, T111 -1l I'NNYISFn
9o,00n
µM 1, 19]8
t ^'l•lr,r
. In.1,. I. r..l.. ..n 11 .....
X11.1 eIn
11.11 rI CI'. 1.e1 �. 'IIJ.<1 •d P
I1A1II Mr�AA",,
M.
fM
TMf'SM1NTAi101 n IT
4
IINI III„ I41, 11ciI
l,sl 1nx IY It_ x1.
•
I., lion
TM.......
p0.n.il1: 1NY.G
ci Inp IA. I.I MITf
,YI! IN IATNF
Alino.ol
lliTi,btU
To A, \l lr, 1-1"
AM.In Ii IINI_,
no.", ,11 I.Ixf: n /111X11, VISTA
F IN1 T Y. M
.., III
- n .
2'.
lull Tn T.
.lN f /I -I IY
M:IM'I:NI xll li
!1X11
I. 11X1
111 Till,
14 NNI..A1 AIIIAI1Ili.n 111.IF.
of ToI
II.I1�p
e�In
!II
X,11. LIM
14 o0l,44n IIIII..WF IrAR(I111Y111
Moil To F. IT\Y �
1II..gxl
I
`
ui_ Tlo.
14 nu4G1V 11.111.iAn a /VmITANn
rn..1T 1X[reIII 11
1
i. m
u,
lexv unl 11X11
14 111.11n AIAII.S i.w NnwI
vvlrn 111 4 u11
rma
In
.I Mrl n PAx,L.
:•, �XII1
AIII.F
.411X1(/ 111111 IAI 11nu
lnll:vn�.
u xxinl on.,
.. Xo...an 1.10 l..tuul ol, 1-1.1
Ie11. 1111 1 Al
1X11.11, All n ITHIII
44 HNA.'II IIINIA. 1111n.1V14111N
MA1. 1111'
.I, 111
1, non
on,
111 All-,
I4 IIolln, FI\nllll.l. NIIA1, .,,,i
NIn1A +X0111- 1x1
`
.., In
... In.
I.N11,I 11.1.I.I M•1
IS 111'11. I'll V /111 41
oll N.N
I . ono
- I1
In.11.WA All I'll
11 Nn..... AXXU1 Yh ono,1I1
Y\IAT 11111` 1.1
Xnn
III:LI.I .All.'!
14 EnIllN IT I.I.T: X.19111
„ll Xi ['1111 IlA1,
on.
.. `
.•I 1
IIG.I..WN All Ill
1'1 11 -7111 1111 IIAXNIN
MA 1X1 CHIP IFAI.
Ion
..
......
Ill 1-N A....Vli
IG Iin411n ill A,P,on X!1..0.1111
loll I TW111f. SII:n"
- ,n, II
.. 1.,
1 loon
III,f.1111AAT
1111\'
.1. 1'.
Iin`
•
AVtn1Y
14 IIIO.G>n 1.l."AO 1 /I NV!'.N
MollI I'll A
'I',
1111
1111
rA l Ail.111
lnTAI 1. Il XII Cltt
111.1n,I
PM.Xf[itN M1.1111
14 11111 .n] Ail.N Y(IM1rI'1111.1.
VIUNY lHoll-olo -l11W
.'1 ,'M11
1`I,'ono
I Ion
IM1Y 0.,N\ \X1111`1 x•IW
Ij Ilnn. 11 Al :11 I..
IYJ.I' TI 111:IAI IANiI.
1
1.`n:I
.. 1
[AIr NI0.i 11X111
44 1111111 1.}i N N• IYTX 11I1,1.1[In!
lui Nf 'In ,
I.. t1,
.nn
l., 1
\IIYI ANn AG 1.,1
11 Il b..n4 X111 x'A0.XIM
MIX[ 1111I1 I'll
1. = 1111
-'
"4 n
"
V11.11-11,.
11.11.`1'1 IIIIIII ANN
IIN1111 %A An Atoll vl':I
fit, T111 -1l I'NNYISFn
9o,00n
µM 1, 19]8
t ^'l•lr,r
. In.1,. I. r..l.. ..n 11 .....
X11.1 eIn
11.11 rI CI'. 1.e1 �. 'IIJ.<1 •d P
v
0
.W CCT MR
CC 1. M LIMITS
IRS M ..
URMLGX AVERIE
14 XW6E1 N.1. LIXC /AYALOM
CXIP REAL 6 STRLR
HAVEN AVERR
17 XN694 AT CW.FM COLLEGE
TRA71W RURAL
TORKR A.A.
11 .f ZIA AT 6TN ST.
OMIW.GE CF.SIC.
I.M. AV.SSE
11 MMSII AT FII 66
DESIGN OM[.WBE RTEUCC
NELIJNX ATESTRE
14 N06208 AT SMA FW 522 "3
pl S... BM I1W.e ""'I,
SAPMIRE ST.(IR91B91
14 1106596 11 MAYAN 6 IIII.LSIOE
.1. METICI1171.
IIERIRtvA AVEWE
LS X06209 AT SWR KISS BW 523.41
SORVEY 6
VALLEY I.E. STREET
25 1..1 MST OF ESLLRAR
pAl FMNT TO CURX
MSF MAL
15 1106626 GST .1 1II.Li.N
EAVE1RM iL• NRR
SAN REISA.I,I. RMO
11 IIOL LtlO TMCI .. ]]21
C(SRST. REEX
ARRW PO V[P.ISA90611
14 X06AB4 WIACHITE. /A.0 1.1.0
PAVIW. PARTICIMTION
.IAIIKE STREET
24 110610] 111416AM0 AVE. 5 O.1T N
PARTICIPATION
RAXCW CCC TFL SNUY
G9 .0680) F SIRO CU.. AREA
TMFFIC SNOY
CA.MMAX STREET
IS BWEZ9 III HILL CC M /MSR 1.I AY
STOEX ..E RE.I.
CRMF. AVENUE
14 X01289 AT SFRR EIXG A. 510.14
Y1.. MVEMM
BERYL STREET
20 NOl oOI MMAS ST X /1NXMN1tA OR.
STOW] OARIGE p[MIR
.1 NILL CC III
10 NO1W2 AT ... .A CMX.W.L
S1. .1. REPAIR
AM.TY ST ST.
IS X06961 E0.714 OF 1. ST.
0.I.L. NME
M.LLt A. AVEROE
20 ROIOII A. RCS FE X /0050 LINE
ITOM OA R PRPAIR
RELLNAX AVERTS
I" 1101014 COC. C.A. WARR0.• ..TE
ISOM 14 GE REPAIR
RELLINX AVCMIE
20 X07015 MST LIRE 1.111 R, LA VIM
STORE MINCE REPAIR
SAp M]0.[ STREET
40 U0I016 SW,. OE VINNR
STORN UMNCE REPAIR
MVCX AVIRI2
20 1101005 BEER CREEK WEASE LIM
STORM OAY E REPAIR
WYE. AR CYM
10 X02001 VICICRU X /IWT
STORM MIN 4E SEPAIR
UAXALIAR AVENUE
AE4591R AT AAMA.
STOM MPABE AE.PAIA
CAPNEMAX AVERM
IOE IIIE] MRTII OE k'II.SON
SIC. .1.1 AFPAIR
MISC MI.A STRIP1 RYRRE REAIR
U. CUCAMNG ARG
SAX RT.REAmt Tw CWNIY TMNSIRTATWN OEM.,
E,TE, ETE➢ FIRLIECTS LIST FOR l977-I9
EUOCETLO AM.• ERCJECTEO EXPEXOINAES
ANIUM ENRNOCO TO 'T. ]O, 1918
zoo A, zoO
- 0 - 1,500 2.000
0 -
300 100 LDS
N
C- 2,C
- O - 100 100
0 - ].]00 ],]00
o - loo loo
0 - 1.900 1,900
- o - 1,6so z,6oa
- 0 - - 0
-n- -n- 6,000
1.000
0
]yCOa
51 .44 ). 5nn 4.14950 BN.Y4
EST. FONRE
Cma.
AEI YPL'RSE]6 MS
FY 1141 EUOCET
r r..n 10".
]6.m
Vnlr rec on.r a.,.,rni
0
0
0-
0-
-0-
MJ
0 -
0
0
-V
-
0-
0-
140,0oa
40. VV0
49.000
-0-
].nnn
B -
I I.VM
-0-
I
X.Uro
0
_w.
o-
]SL.IW
Cl. .1
(, -'I...
E.e u1..R<e , p, H.. M.1 COUl Be ,rill p.v
5]1,000 eE c
Xa [ri r[xef r.rr4 Fy [r 5' p. a peaea.C�Sr. d.r. ra• •e
Elven t
e (u rt xer lvYrk xy Cnim tY pro frrae a. Fn Rr.
rr Fefl rrn Y C un ] p p .ed. LIS'.
Sl ven rn Cll yr4
.n roan . p p d. Enr f. d.r. la e
Cmfl ele S 1`
Cmmfle..
fmupl ere
- SIiBM.
Cmpl ere
f mpl et<
<hMVl <e 1—N,R, 1170. .a .anmmne.0 I.,u.u.11m
.1 . ,m.rl< R.
f..n... f
e..... d
CM e. n.nsl rn5r_.n 9. mmpl e.e
llca et , na.rna lr. 1. 1 ..m pl ere
r,mrle«
1'o der .nn.l rnr
r r..n 10".
<oni l'l ea<
Vnlr rec on.r a.,.,rni
MI
w
Por. S. W.1 /4, Sec. 11, T IS., R. 7 W, S. S. 8, a M.
,5-r,e,C.r7- ✓WCUTIOA/ A10-1
208 208
40 w
- 57,IE
A Si S
05
S, 1..1'7,f e;� s/
Por Cucamonga Fruit Lands I M.8 419
1NOIC4Tef-S A.C'EA TO BE AladNtwzvz-17
Ouconjongo
Tax Code Area
6706
21
Assessor's Map
Noce- Assessor's fk 8 Lot Book 209 Page 04
Numbers Sho.n in Cfrcles Son Bernardino County
2oq-04
I
Jff
pj
Ll
A20.1
2 -e3 -69 C a
0128176 SUB
121f.116 Ur
./c
4�
,30,
SALINA ST rQA
J -1
041
05
S, 1..1'7,f e;� s/
Por Cucamonga Fruit Lands I M.8 419
1NOIC4Tef-S A.C'EA TO BE AladNtwzvz-17
Ouconjongo
Tax Code Area
6706
21
Assessor's Map
Noce- Assessor's fk 8 Lot Book 209 Page 04
Numbers Sho.n in Cfrcles Son Bernardino County
2oq-04
I
Jff
pj
Ll
A20.1
2 -e3 -69 C a
0128176 SUB
121f.116 Ur
./c
FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into, in duplicate,
this , day of , 19_, by and between
the State of California, acting by and through the Department of
Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "the State ", and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter referred to as "the City"
witnesseth:
WHEREAS, on February 24, 1975, a freeway agreement
was executed betv:een the City and the State wherein the City
agreed and consented to certain adjustments of the City street
system required for the development of that portion of State
highway Route 15 (previously Route 31) vdthin the limits of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, as a freeway, and
WHEREAS, said freeway has now been completed or is
nearing, completion, and the parties hereto mutually desire to
clarify the division of maintenance responsibility as to separ-
ation structures, and City streets or portions thereof, and
landscaped areas, within the freeway limits, and
WHEREAS, under Section 4 of the above freeway agree-
ment, the City will resume control and maintenance over each
of the relocated or reconstructed City streets except on those
portions thereof adopted as a part of the freeway proper.
MAINTENANCE DEFINED:
Maintenance is defined in Section 27 of the Streets
and Highways Code as follovr:
-1- 7s
Sec. 27. "(a) Tlf2' preservation and keeping 0 rights —of —way,
and each type of roadway, structures, safety
convenience or device, planting, illumination
equipment and other facility, in the safe and
usable condition to which it has been improved
or constructed, but does not include recon-
struction or other improvement.
"(b) Operation of special safety convenience and
devices, and illumi nating equipment.
"(c) The special or emergency maintenance or repair
necessitated by accidents or by storms or other
Breather conditions, slides, settlements or other
unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway,
structure or facility."
NOt1 THEitErORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. When a planned future improvement has been constructed and/
or a minor revision has been effected within the limits of
the freeway herein described, ;diich affects the division of
Maintenance, the Department will provide a new dated and
revised Exhibit "A ", which is made a part hereof by this
reference, which will supersede the original exhibit and
which :rill become part of this agreement.
2. ROLYWAY SECTIONS
The City will maintain, at City expense, all portions of
City streets and appurtenant structures and bordering areas,
within the designated areas on the attached maps marked
EXHIBIT "A ".
— 2 —
I
3. VEHICULAR 010CRO33INGS •
The State will maintain, at State expense, the entire
structure below the deck surface except as hereinafter
provided. The City will maintain, at City expense, the
deck and /or surfacing and shall perform such work as may
be necessary to ensure an impervious and /or otherwise
suitable surface. The City will also maintain all por-
tions of the structure above the bridge deck, as above
specified, including lighting installations, as well as
all traffic service facilities (signals, signs, pavement
markings, etc.) that may be required for the benefit or
control of City street traffic.
At such locations, as shall be determined by the State,
screening shall be placed on State freeway overpasses on
which pedestrians are allowed (as directed by Sec. 92.6
of the Streets and Highways Code). All screens under this
program vill be maintained by the State (at State expense).
4. VEHICULAR UNDERCROSSINGS
The State will maintain the structure proper. The roadway
section, including the traveled way, shoulders, curbs,
sidewalks, walls (including eliminating graffiti), drainage
installations, lighting installations and traffic service
facilities that may be required for the benefit or control
of City street traffic will be maintained by the City.
5. PEDESTRIAN
The State will maintain, at State expense, the entire
structure below the top of the concrete deck surface,
exclusive oftny surface treatment thereof. The City will
maintain, at City expense, the top of the concrete deck sur-
face, together with any surface treatment thereon, and all
portions of the structure above the concrete deck surface,
EXCEPT SCREENING which will be maintained by the State at
State expense, and shall perform such other work as may be
necessary to insure an impervious and otherwise suitable
surface. The City will also maintain all traffic service
facilities provided for the benefit or control of pedestrian
traffic.
6. PEDESTRIAN
The State will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. The City will maintain all drainage and light-
ing installations and will be responsible for all cleaning
and painting as may be required to keep the structure free
of debris and graffiti.
7. LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO CROSSING STRUCTURES
Landscaped areas within the limits reserved for freeway
use, including traffic interchanges and on and off ramp
areas but excluding frontage road areas, will be main-
tained by the State, at State expense. All plantings or
other types of roadside development lying outside of the
area reserved for freeway use will be maintained by the
City at City expense.
8. INTERCHANGE OPEitATION
It is the responsibility of the State to provide efficient
operation of freeway interchanges including ramp connections
ZT
1
to local struts. The State will not pvfor the maintenance,
repair, servicing, or power for ordinary street lighting; how-
ever, the maintenance of lighting at intersections designed
under current warrants for the safety of persons using these
facilities will be paid for by the State and shared with the
City in the same ratio as the number of intersecting roads
or streets under jurisdiction of the respective agencies bears
to the total number of roads or streets within the particular
intersection; for example, a 50 -50 basis will apply to the
regular four —way intersection. The necessary traffic signals
at ramp terminals will be constructed by the State and timing
adjustments will be the State's responsibility. The cost of
maintaining the traffic signals will be shared by the State
and the City on a pro —rata basis as described above.
9. LIABILITY
It is understood and agreed that neither the State, nor any
officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage
or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted
to be done by the City under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction delegated to the City under the
Freeway Agreement and this Freeway Maintenance Agreement.
It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government
Code Section $95.4, the City shall fully indemnify and hold
the State harmless from any damage or liability occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the City
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdic-
tion delegated to the City under the Agreement.
- 5 -
It is understood and agreed that neithelohe City nor any
officer or employee thereof, is responsible for any damage
or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted
to be done by the State under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction not delegated to the City under the
Freeway Agreement and this Freeway Maintenance Agreement. It
is also understood and agreed, that pursuant to the Government
Code Section 895.4, the State shall fully indemnify and hold
the City harmless from any damage or liability occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the State
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdic-
tion not delegated to the City under the Freeway Agreement
and this Freeway Maintenance Agreement.
10. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement shall be effective upon the date of its exe-
cution by the State; it being understood and agreed, however,
that the execution of this Agreement shall not affect any
pre— existing obligations of the City to maintain designated
areas pursuant to prior written notice from the State that
work in such areas, which the City has agreed to maintain
pursuant to the terms of the Freeway Agreement, has been
completed.
IN '.&ESS i•1HEREOF, the partieslreto have set their
hands and seals the day and year first above written.
Approved as to form and
procedure:
■
Attorney
Department of Transportation
City Attorney
By
CITY OF
By
ayor
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ADRIANA GIANTURCO
Director of Transportation
By
*Approval by State's Attorney is not required unless changes are
made to this form, in which case the draft will be submitted for
Headquarters' review and approval by State's Attorney as to form
and procedure.
— 7 —
SUBJECT FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR INTERSTATE ROUTE 15
Attached are an original and two copies of a proposed Freeway
Maintenance Agreement for Interstate Route 15 - Etiwanda Avenue/
Miller, Base Line /East Avenue, Victoria Street and Cherry Avenue
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Freeway Maintenance
Agreement calls out the responsibility for maintenance of the
roadway facilities for both the State and the City. This is a
standard Maintenance Agreement with the City's responsibility being
limited to maintaining the city street or structure (above the
roadway). The other freeway facilities will be maintained by the
State.
I have reviewed the Agreement and recommend its approval by the
City Council. County Counsel has reviewed and approved similar
agreements between the State and the County.
If this meets with your approval, please have this item placed
on the Council's next Agenda for their approval. The State has
requested a resolution be provided by the Council approving this
Freeway Maintenance Agreement.
Please return the original and one copy of the executed Agreement
to me for processing to Caltrans and retain the other copy for the
City's files. A fully executed copy will he provided to the City
when it is executed by Caltrans.
JRS:MGW:ml
Attach: As noted
It- 1307.000 nti.
NN R. SHO�
4JNTER-
OFFICE MEVO
-
DATE
May 31, 1978
un u.n.mrvo
FROM
JOHN R. SHONE
PHONE 1203`.''
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
TO
LAUREN WASSERMAN
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR INTERSTATE ROUTE 15
Attached are an original and two copies of a proposed Freeway
Maintenance Agreement for Interstate Route 15 - Etiwanda Avenue/
Miller, Base Line /East Avenue, Victoria Street and Cherry Avenue
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Freeway Maintenance
Agreement calls out the responsibility for maintenance of the
roadway facilities for both the State and the City. This is a
standard Maintenance Agreement with the City's responsibility being
limited to maintaining the city street or structure (above the
roadway). The other freeway facilities will be maintained by the
State.
I have reviewed the Agreement and recommend its approval by the
City Council. County Counsel has reviewed and approved similar
agreements between the State and the County.
If this meets with your approval, please have this item placed
on the Council's next Agenda for their approval. The State has
requested a resolution be provided by the Council approving this
Freeway Maintenance Agreement.
Please return the original and one copy of the executed Agreement
to me for processing to Caltrans and retain the other copy for the
City's files. A fully executed copy will he provided to the City
when it is executed by Caltrans.
JRS:MGW:ml
Attach: As noted
It- 1307.000 nti.
NN R. SHO�
FREE'r7AY MAINTENANCE AGREE14ENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into, in duplicate,
this , day of , 19_, by and between.
the State of California, acting by and through the Department of
Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "the State ", and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter referred to as "the City"
witnesseth:
WHEREAS, on February 24, 1975, a freeway agreement
was executed between the City and the State wherein the City
agreed and consented to certain adjustments of the City street
system required for the development of that portion of State
highway Route 15 (previously Route 31) within the limits of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, as a freeway, and
WHEREAS, said freeway has now been completed or is
nearing completion, and the parties hereto mutually desire to
clarify the division of maintenance responsibility as to separ-
ation structures, and City streets or portions thereof, and
landscaped areas, within the freeway limits, and
WHEREAS, under Section 4 of the above freeway agree-
ment, the City will resume control and maintenance over each
of the relocated or reconstructed City streets except on those
portions thereof adopted as a part of the freeway proper.
MAINTENANCE DEFINED:
Maintenance is defined in Section 27 of the Streets
and Highways Code as follows:
- 1 - 7T
~• Sec. 27. "(a) The preservation and keeping oprights -of -way,
and each type of roadway, structures, safety
convenience or device, planting, illumination
equipment and other facility, in the safe and
usable condition to which it has been improved
or constructed, but does not include recon-
struction or other improvenent.
"(b) Operation of special safety convenience and
devices, and illuminating equipment.
"(c) The special or emergency maintenance or repair
necessitated by accidents or by storms or other
weather conditions, slides, settlements or other
unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway,
structure or facility."
NO"' THERUORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. When a planned future improvement has been constructed and/
or a minor revision has been effected within the limits of
the freeway herein described, which affects the division of
Maintenance, the Department will provide a new dated and
revised Exhibit "A ", which is made a part hereof by this
reference, which will supersede the original exhibit and
which will become part of this agreement.
2. ROADWAY SECTIONS
The City will maintain, at City expense, all portions of
City streets and appurtenant structures and bordering areas,
within the designated areas on the attached maps marked
EXHIBIT "A ".
— 2 —
3.' VEHICULAR OVE9OSSINGS •
The State will maintain, at State expense, the entire
structure below the deck surface except as hereinafter
provided. The City will maintain, at City expense, the
deck and /or surfacing and shall perform such work as may
be necessary to ensure an impervious and /or otherori.se
suitable surface. The City will also maintain all por-
tions of the structure above the bridge deck, as above
specified, including lighting installations, as tivell as
all traffic service facilities (signals, signs, pavement
markings, etc.) that may be required for the benefit or
control of City street traffic.
At such locations, as shall be determined by the State,
screening shall be placed on State freeway overpasses on
which pedestrians are allowed (as directed by Sec. 92.6
of the Streets and Highways Code). All screens under this
program will be maintained by the State (at State expense).
4. VEHICULAR UNDERCROSSINGS
The State will maintain the structure proper. The roadway
section, including the traveled way, shoulders, curbs,
sidewalks, walls (including eliminating graffiti), drainage
installations, lighting installations and traffic service
facilities that may be required for the benefit or control
of City street traffic will be maintained by the City.
$. PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSINGS
The State will maintain, at State expense, the entire
structure below the top of the concrete deck surface,
=10
exclusive of aqy surface treatment there The City will
maintain, at City expense, the top of the concrete deck sur-
face, together with any surface treatment thereon, and all
portions of the structure above the concrete deck surface,
EXCEPT SCREENING which will be maintained by the ,State at
State expense, and shall perform such other work as may be
necessary to insure an impervious and otherwise suitable
surface. The City will also maintain all traffic service
facilities provided for the benefit or control of pedestrian
traffic.
6. PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSINGS
The State will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. The City will maintain all drainage and light-
ing installations and will be responsible for all cleaning
and painting as may be required to keep the structure free
of debris and graffiti.
7. LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO CROSSING STRUCTURES
Landscaped areas within the limits reserved for freeway
use, including traffic interchanges and on and off ramp
areas but excluding frontage road areas, will be main-
tained by the State, at State expense. All plantings or
other types of roadside development lying outside of the
area reserved for freeway use will be maintained by the
City at City expense.
S. INTERCHANGE OPERATION
It is the responsibility of the State to provide efficient
operation of freeway interchanges including ramp connections
— 4 —
to local stre• . The State will not pa}oor the maintenance,
repair, servicing, or power for ordinary street lighting; how-
ever, the maintenance of lighting at intersections designed
under current warrants for the safety of persons using these
facilities will be paid for by the State and shared with the
City in the same ratio as the number of intersecting roads
or streets under jurisdiction of the respective agencies bears
to the total number of roads or streets within the particular
intersection; for example, a 50 -50 basis will apply to the
regular four -way intersection. The necessary traffic signals
at ramp terminals will be constructed by the State and timing
adjustments will be the State's responsibility. The cost of
maintaining the traffic signals will be shared by the State
and the City on a pro -rata basis as described above.
9. LIABILITY
It is understood and agreed that neither the State, nor any
officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage
or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted
to be done by the City under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction delegated to the City under the
Freeway Agreement and this Freeway Maintenance Agreement.
It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government
Code Section 895.4, the City shall fully indemnify and hold
the State harmless from any damage or liability occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the City
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdic-
tion delegated to the City under the Agreement.
- 5 -
It is understood and agreed that neither4ke City nor any
officer or employee thereof, is responsible for any damage
or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted
to be done by the State under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction not delegated to the City under the
Freeway Agreement and this Freeway Maintenance Agreement. It
is also understood and agreed, that pursuant to the Government
Code Section 895.4, the State shall fully indemnify and hold
the City harmless from any damage or liability occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the State
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdic-
tion not delegated to the City under the Freeway Agreement
and this Freeway Maintenance Agreement.
10. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement shall be effective upon the date of its exe-
cution by the State; it being understood and agreed, however,
that the execution of this Agreement shall not affect any
pre— existing obligations of the City to maintain designated
areas pursuant to prior written notice from the State that
work in such areas, which the City has agreed to maintain
pursuant to the terms of the Freeway Agreement, has been
completed.
— 6 —
IN WASS wHEREOFp the parties leeto have set their
hands and seals the day and year first above written.
Approved as to form and
procedure:
Attorney
Department of Transportation
City Attorney
CITY OF
sy
Mayor
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTP,ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ADRIANA GIANTURCO
Director of Transportation
*Approval by State's Attorney is not required unless changes are
made to this forms in which case the draft will be submitted for
Headquarters' review and approval by State's Attorney as to form
and procedure.
- 7 -
•.
STATE OF (A. ' +'E
AUSINESS AND TRANS; iAPO.; AGEIICY
DEPARTL1ENT OF T�' „lSPO TAT{OP1
PROJECT P1.4ti,S FOR MNSTCL(CT10'1 ON
STATE Ill, a`
IN SAN BERNARI JrJO COUNTY
IN AND NEAR FONTANA FROM 0.2 MILE NOnTH OF ROUT
TO 0.4 MILE NORTH OF BASE LINE
L ks sappl:meotti ly Sts^k': F.: s Es,IA L-..:.7 1313
Ixv 6u UC 1 \'h On R
I B, No 55Z 9J6
Bt,. lm. fnta
Br No Si 97..
FONTANA.
•• S-91 IN FEET
Leeplh of Work = 3.3 miles
Ih of Major Consirudion
= �. r.... .l,n..,....��:•n.[..�...,.�«... Jeep 1.1 miles
.
INDEX OF SHUTS
SM•1 Mo I
T.Ib SnW
• 0 -5
T.e<OI Cr•\\ Sr[r.9n9
• • .
Aenlara haq lnr
• S-,I
Ian a ^e N.I.I.
r -n
Tmll•< SI99'n9
_ t0 -94
5ummuq of C•a.ne98 S1r•I9n104
15-01
D.9�naa. c.•eJ.
• 08
Sm9. l•' ^9 c.•a.•
29
Ygnnonunn.bucee D•ron\
31-]1
A9n\ cne ❑.cu.wl
R -59
Smmer r- ban. e,9 ..'• ...
• 45-91
S+m Pm. c.ua•na
• So -9
Po•• ^•,� v •• • mn P.1 Mr ..\web / V.,W.
• So-,
59.001 C.•a•b•
e_e/ocr wigs
• TO -94
[u•e ^eu 9.. VC Or 1e'9 -9/5 R/L
• 11 -95
Ie.� a.. U C B• k 59 -91:
• 9a -IDi
fml 4. VC 91 So 59 -'1'6
•03
Bm.... V C e•r,nN 9H All
• ':4
No O�.ero<0 M Br No 54-965F/I
• • I -9
SePr.b.el.en DCi•em.
- 1,$a
Cmu S.0 m.
•.
STATE OF (A. ' +'E
AUSINESS AND TRANS; iAPO.; AGEIICY
DEPARTL1ENT OF T�' „lSPO TAT{OP1
PROJECT P1.4ti,S FOR MNSTCL(CT10'1 ON
STATE Ill, a`
IN SAN BERNARI JrJO COUNTY
IN AND NEAR FONTANA FROM 0.2 MILE NOnTH OF ROUT
TO 0.4 MILE NORTH OF BASE LINE
L ks sappl:meotti ly Sts^k': F.: s Es,IA L-..:.7 1313
Ixv 6u UC 1 \'h On R
I B, No 55Z 9J6
Bt,. lm. fnta
Br No Si 97..
FONTANA.
•• S-91 IN FEET
Leeplh of Work = 3.3 miles
Ih of Major Consirudion
= �. r.... .l,n..,....��:•n.[..�...,.�«... Jeep 1.1 miles
1#15 - 5(40)113
STO or (AUrctr!A
EUSINESS hND T�ANSPORTATION AGUICY
TARTLIEi1T OF TRANSPO CHT01 REDUCED FLAN
E(T PL;IS rOR CONSTRLICH071 ON
r rF' nes.•n
ST�'ATr MUII bJli`t
IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FONTANA FROM 0.2 MILE NORTH OF ROUTE 66
TO 0.4 MILE NORTH OF BASE LINE
L it EsFpVmWt: by S.-(_ l FLs WA L-..,Ly 1373
Etiwanda
NC ei
S ±9•'L
SG 963 B t
LQ'Vi! N MAP
�`I V
End of Yajot CvstrWc n
Sta 402.00 r 7 2
TO OEVOBE -.
UVEar c_ ?!�J °•1,�• _End of VfurV. f p +\
B1 no 55 9a d� Sla 405 00 x
D
i3nfL. uc o9 tpt� FONTANA c. "•'�f• "/
r-mf IN FEET
sw o wo
Length of Work = 3.3 miles
Length of Major Construction = 1.7 miles
4 moo 64
Iry ilhi ��
+f••
INDEX 61 }MIEIS mw
•:n w 1
i:.,. s...
1 j O
• nCIC[d!1B0
f r
1
.tea ru•.a v
.r
fc
I \b /
_ N
Loa• cmar„n.on
- 55 -e1
Genoa. • IN
• 0-10
puma. Iaan
1519
yv:'Or ..ra'•
_ BI
loJ te.. -:,. Spn 6•Am Cro•wl
- - 64-10
SW e a
107
_ 111.101
.'.HO.:,
SP.ry 0,Z..le: ...I
E.,rta1
-
12.
122-,25
I _ . IM- 1a1
pc..�N +'m•o, 1aTm1 C•Ip:l•
1 eR,mc
R4N1
Ii0 l40
V.(•:. 0 5511..1 V 1111.v„ Q.
Br q 54 -965 R;L
• 1.1 -1!A
[W (1111. C,•,• R,
B• Fq }4_V,,4 FIL
-;C0
[u,1 EI ^ea <•e!• P " ;•.
B, Iq 54L. ce
=U5
• 161 -ILL
(mr D.ra ^ 1.a 0•aa.,
•r,
Br •o Sac -K9
• 14 >-Il%
(c,' r••:a0 :'rr• c'
B, Iq 54 -(3 :5
Y +•• -•,r e:•y. Sr..c.I':n.
Pr Mc 5'S -9!0
-I6J
• 101 -:69
le,
,.,
Sm.• ^.ea•'v ^ab • ,v.,a,
G L 54 -ng6
15J-199
- aBB NS
61 1.:.•u- La-':] C a . n,.cp,
Br Np •ALi2a
1 - 5 S,ttraa.ol:on L.ca'pn,
...... 1,4! 224
i U I,,- r• w,,, C•rn 0, 1,: 546VIS
- �I�lr:1 t!.raC•er. Br RC t491,1 R L
.... 5...I, uc 6. No 54 nRS R t
SA T,, r r, oc A, N. 5: $66 ___ _ _ ____ - --
a,rVUF:e-5i Br Ne 5'9LR l L_ H, O: W ;1
Sto 34.90 f 111gv�va l,ve fi =tae f(=
i `� ;e [•.m •cr 5<a,•er.on B, N >Se 95F Sto 42 1 26
. +611 «I 1...r v Ueo B, N, Sac u,a of ElhghlandA
lo,• 1,...m o..• e•ee s.c :66 ;il PM
_I Beginning of Major Consl
Sta 402(00 F PM 7.2
Etiwondo
BBglnnlrlg o' '71 tr'n
«'.a._fu •s5, rf ,err,. n;
0
SIAH of (A! I+ r llA
BUSINESS AND TRA!:SPOUATION AG[!:'Y
OEPARTLiENT OF M% NSPO TAT NI
PROJECT PLANTS FOI: COl!ST UCTl0 :! ON
STATE
IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NEAR FONTANA ON ROU
FROM 0.4 MILE NORTH OF BASE LINE TO SAN SEVAINE
AND ON ROUTE 30 FROM 0.3 MILE EAST OF EAST AV
TO 0.6 MILE WEST OF HEFALOCK AVENUE
A tt supplemented ly Slarr_.d Pans Ltd 13c�2ry U76
1?
i
1
1 j�11 I
_
se
epd^
N; - - - - -- /-
%
___- SIB 116
Pm
S� �•Arf t
x
C rrloi[:
01, [,nr1ry [lir+,{
X 7'
i
UJ
1 j O
• nCIC[d!1B0
f r
1
.tea ru•.a v
.r
fc
I \b /
N; - - - - -- /-
%
___- SIB 116
Pm
S� �•Arf t
x
C rrloi[:
01, [,nr1ry [lir+,{
X 7'
i
0015- 5(42)114
STATE 0E CALUCOCA
BUSINESS AND TRARSPORTATION AGENCY
DEPARRIENT OF Tf NSPORTATION
ROJECT PLA12S FOR MISTRUCT10.1 ON
STATE Irl31:,117 y
'RNARDINO COUNTY NEAR FONTANA ON ROUTE 15
41LE NORTH OF BASE LINE TO SAN SEVAI dE ROAD �p
JTE 30 FROM 0.3 MILE EAST OF EAST AVENUE
0 0.6 MILE WEST OF HEMLOCK AVENUE
To it sup;!elrrented by stxud F @vs eated t%wy 13:5 d° Q ,
,-r .r
I
s1
�i
., AI
End of Mrk r - --
On Rte 15 (I ".1 1r 07) -- On Rte 144(15E) (1'M. 17 11/17 47)
End 01 t4ajor Coast
sta 52;100 j PAT 9.5
V Eim_ds of Work
Sta 150, 04 Highland Ave
St_o 116.50
fL Hr9hlond A+C
PM 130
walr OOLnQ tMMel
LOCATION MAP
K......
L F G F N D
mu PROPOSED
-- FUT UP.E
= EMDANW.IENT ONLY
SCALE IN FFE1
o �c+ • x
length of Work Pte 10 =2.22 miles
{ length of Work No 15-14.09 miles
i Length of Work Rte 3V2.18 mites
$ length of Work Rte 194 (15 E) °0.30 -Ae
length of Major Construction -2.3 miles
j
Garton N[.1 08 -172 �i
)y
g
5eP`
a
yr
i
II ;
Se
`y
I
s1
�i
., AI
End of Mrk r - --
On Rte 15 (I ".1 1r 07) -- On Rte 144(15E) (1'M. 17 11/17 47)
End 01 t4ajor Coast
sta 52;100 j PAT 9.5
V Eim_ds of Work
Sta 150, 04 Highland Ave
St_o 116.50
fL Hr9hlond A+C
PM 130
walr OOLnQ tMMel
LOCATION MAP
K......
L F G F N D
mu PROPOSED
-- FUT UP.E
= EMDANW.IENT ONLY
SCALE IN FFE1
o �c+ • x
length of Work Pte 10 =2.22 miles
{ length of Work No 15-14.09 miles
i Length of Work Rte 3V2.18 mites
$ length of Work Rte 194 (15 E) °0.30 -Ae
length of Major Construction -2.3 miles
j
Garton N[.1 08 -172 �i
SHEET I TOTAL
�I 1 DIST. CO. I RTE. P. M. NO. ISHEETS
-`� 08 SBO 15 1 5.97
_ - , ; ; � CIS I' ' `f �f G� I �'d.� %o' • //
icx coma— i�- /J_____ !! '1 `/ '•t.�r� xa••ax 4 ..�x' °-
„'�n`�.r..z,,.�.,...,•�
—_. '� i/ :• -{'1 ~./ 1 1•x24 eC
f Vii_ rr,,,?`- j� a :�� [la 'N� i \ �•
`• /� -!� 1'. IL" ��I� "C LOCATION
ETIWANDA *r, MILLER AVE'S
Area maintained by COUNTY EXHIBIT "A"
• — vs.x mx. c+, -mi f`.' `' \ DIST. CO.
t Q tl� —,c� � c, 1���, •
Zl�1 \ \h _ ♦,- > _ _�. -� -` may/\ - - \1.
A
Jec 9q�
aaurE n v
gl
��..•,. .1 /;ff ///i�•A %/
3A' 30 01ARl -ILL �• \�. ��.�
�'`li - :- _�I Tr �. •J /.' —�. - ". �(4. a „ J99. y :r, a Bau LN- tl —�`
[e:r tvf A i;E
tlR IJA
•, Y 975
p Sal {ri •'sT'
i / \♦ I.JIe - .1 ]J (rp .. 1 \ems ?_"- �-- •_,.�, a- k.�- n..... �.�rf�rRrl.9
Area maintained by I
\ r.°r oaf- :'_Iiw :;fi YWN
3es.0
/Ir \
1
> •w'� /•b I�e ero.�s l:e °♦. i�
♦
Y r9• ]J ?0 [e�1Ia-
•°7°r
N•/b ✓ kGJTE 11
/.�r.'��f� \V.� \.\ •i9 nip ♦) /. .�
Sr:. is:. tn. .a1L_Jrz. \.� \.` \•,```\_,a, -• \.0 �_ .:C _
\\
La. C76i :f 9'0 1491-11 ♦e \\•. \`'•, *\♦ \-�
ssxl I—L .v L`�.. �r..`�i`_�i __•a_.h ial ?+'�t
to yf.. »g_, _. `�' ..F�`' ♦d, .`,;�Yrsrl rT --
_ � _• _ � `.. eta y \\.., I 'r q � �„ •or,.
ar
` °" - -• �� `�� LOCATION ,
1 BASE LI NE � EAST
EXHIBIT "A"
I
SHEET
TOTAL
DIST,
CO.
RTB P.M.
NO.
SHEETS
08
SBO
15 6.71
\ r.°r oaf- :'_Iiw :;fi YWN
3es.0
/Ir \
1
> •w'� /•b I�e ero.�s l:e °♦. i�
♦
Y r9• ]J ?0 [e�1Ia-
•°7°r
N•/b ✓ kGJTE 11
/.�r.'��f� \V.� \.\ •i9 nip ♦) /. .�
Sr:. is:. tn. .a1L_Jrz. \.� \.` \•,```\_,a, -• \.0 �_ .:C _
\\
La. C76i :f 9'0 1491-11 ♦e \\•. \`'•, *\♦ \-�
ssxl I—L .v L`�.. �r..`�i`_�i __•a_.h ial ?+'�t
to yf.. »g_, _. `�' ..F�`' ♦d, .`,;�Yrsrl rT --
_ � _• _ � `.. eta y \\.., I 'r q � �„ •or,.
ar
` °" - -• �� `�� LOCATION ,
1 BASE LI NE � EAST
EXHIBIT "A"
I
..V.. 1191HX3 Aq pau!elu!ew eaJV
NOI1VOO'l
LN }]5.3 \ LY.Y0dn31' -� �•,°�\. J` 't. Y/Y'
11L4L.� 1...:.11LL111J.:Y -LaL., • • • • • � •
:IVY
r
.L Cdr / • J � �. m.eive.LCn tc M�.f /' \.
•� ry >� >Iv sr Ge. u• /
% _ R
- \ � 015..2 d� •••1$ '}.�•�— � __
o]m.oe anN • _
G
w1n101
�- <�,� b P•1 1 ]DY pJ CS � 6 i, 1. )� 'Y
2
S.Y� -r unwJ T ]B tG q. n f •q S'�`i�3b..... ..� `� rh-JtI^.'T`n.��
l�R. rTrrrrr. r! n* rrr. rllt.'f-•-1 r:` mr .nrrnl.m+'^Yr• *l�'- rG ^+- I+lr.. -.— +•��!�.- .rll+ --�-^ $ �ve
IY.IlYM3l -•• A
\ a
17b'L I 51 I(Iqgl 80
S 'ON Wd '3121 •00 '1ST(
L 133HS
Al
SS mt It
.09. 1- 11 r- It
.97. 63 M It I I 1.ro 2
— T,.,k
55
'101. ES
LJLL& MLWLmn
v
Area maintained by
•]0: I. SC G1,
A a a—
A
I DIST.
CO.
I
RTE.1
1
P.M.
� I
I I
N 0.
SHEETS
08
iSool
151
6183
1 1
A 12-17-
1.92 .51 24 011
'V Ll I"
32. E
Z' $a 1:7 IL [1,1 C-
21 S. U IL to � I
is -4, 66 a I, Ow K,
k, Eft
—: �3 C.-
17 oL--, L rNIML t-'W CMi 195•_9! 22 [:_LL SE N ..I IP
Oros .1
RR,
In so 92 V LL St
LOCATION
-CHFF-9--( PVa
EXHIBIT "A"
7
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
,.s
21
28
?,9
'C
31
0
rnzcrc�' into, In tLI's
d.-,v of
ls,--, by and batwe.In t'W,
W
aztLn; by and the
Azency, of of I-,
-ghwrys, here-
, inaft_- for to as, "the Scat.e," and the
V_. S-'-" 'hC-.rAC.nftC.r &Jr conv= nionce ri:Zer•v ea co.
IS 'ItIIIL C3%Jn"Y'
Stata E.q-, Co,_nty have 11�krcro_';re antar�d into a
dLtod Jcnu.iry 24, 19'6, reiatin- to cho.;�
�=clioas 047 I-r. th.c county 0-4 s4il
Ba .ar,2'no oa Fotte 31 betw4z.q Rivarz'da Cocnty Line and Rsucu 15
near 1)•vora and on Foutc :5 b-tw_-.on 0.4 vile soLth and 0.6
mile north of Devrre; and
II
VIIZ F`-.S, the plr.n of construction, as sho-zr. on E;ehiluit A
attac%ca to said ril—ea-ent, has beer. altered i.n certain razoects
since the date of exectition of said a2reemeat; and
WHI:SkS, a new plan map has been prc-parcd sh%ivine the
altered plan of conctmctf.on.
FO• it is aSreod:
1, That the plan cap attaohad hu rato, %-.rked revised
Exh_bit A., shall be substituted fur Lrhib,.t A attached to cne
dated ja=,iry 24, 1966, and bacon:a a p.,;rt of
said arec�mt for all purposes.
li
2. T'hat: ezce�t fen tha sub3tjtetion of the rovisod plan
V-1 5'.id eia,eJ J-.nuavy 24, 1966, shall
in e*r.J unz.cdllfisd by Z,.-; pmvisions of thiz,
1
2
3
4
F
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
16
17
16
i9
2O
21
22
23
24
2s 'I
j
26
27
ij
23
2 ">
3O
3i
i
ji
I
IN F1IY ?I�SS M-11P?OF , the ptrties hereunto hava set their
hands and seals the day above first written.
noY�
Attornoy •.
APPRO TiD •'-
C mil'
,y
tate 2F'f F rsy rc inaa
I`
A: PRGV' D AS TO MM
UTE L'- _ i. -..
Si udJ U. h!:'.,!C�, C2DaTl C69�iSIt
S41i :Ed9 Li!iD CCD,ii Y. CAUMF NIA
97
State of California
Transportation t cncy
Department of Public Works
JOh'h ERRECA
Director of Public Works
COMM OF SAN
(a body Rolit
SEP 39
1Pilaut•iocxd of t %o Eoa:d of SA;..•p15or5 Of
San Bemc lino County, California
On rnotic : of Su-,Zvieor AY-I 0 , duly seconded by
Supo rvicer 3R: ?.K , a:>c cart tee unanimously, the following
re::O'_ution i,,
WHEREAS, the Cou:ay of Sin Bornareino and the State of
Ca'.iforaia z ntored into a fretmi -all a _ecn:cnt on January 2= 1966,
rzl.atiay to Route 31 batweca Riverside Co,=ty Line and Route 15
near Devore, and Route 15 benvccn 0.4 ;;file south and 0.6 Mile
north of Devore; and
WHEREAS. said agreement may be modified at any time by
mutual conscat of the parties tterato; and
i'Ti° :SAS, the ',test End Ceneral Plan, adopted by the County
on Decaonber 27, 1565, substituted a future interchange at the westerly
extension. of Jurupa Avenue for a future interchange at the westerly
extcnsicn of Santa Ana Avenue; and
WHER -E AS the State, at the County's request, has submitted
a su•_i,!c;- :ontal fro.away agreement and revised freeway plan effecting
the above substitution.
NOW, TIIBREFO]:E, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Super -
visccs of tL•d Coantj of San Bcrnardino that it hcrcby annroves and
directs its C'nair:nan to sizn said supplemental freeway agreement
dated JUL 3 , for the portion of Rout.. 31 between
the Rivars+c.,iZ:ountj Line aad Route 15 near Devore; and
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the County Engineer is directed
to transmit certified copies of this resolution and signed copies of the
egreement to the State Department of Public Works, Division of Highways:
SWE OF CA.L:'ORNIA
CLUN7" CF 11N ..:`IAdaINO u
I. V. trN`d= •..,.n_ _, Coe -;y C.. -x end ex. a N:ce, C%erk of the Board of Superrisan of Son Bernardino ,aunty,
Cal: b:: ia, hr.c:, cer9�y 'c. r.. b .q a f_I!, tme and .arrest cagy of'ha record of the aVi:n taken By soid Board
of S.. wa, sna, it v;re e. tho "'!or: or 'F' pee m:xure in 'ho Official M:nut" of so:d Board of ie meeYnC of
,"L 3 1B;r
Do•ad:
V. DENNIS W.4GOLE
Ccen:y C:uk an.' eoaffic,o
Cla:': of said Beard.
ONTARIO ,- O,�
GUASTI
c-
2 � %
C,
n ';
G o 9 PEE/ \•p ��� .� o +r:cr,
.vre an a r5 be / \�
l \\ 5 '•uct2J Wien
� h Tr:`r�c VO:Um lS
;
\\
V
Ln
Or-
rn
V �
1
6
lep . W I 9L
s
F
< f
NEDA
CD
— TrSN�c inrerchanT nec'.o ^s
��. L!A4i
r. o
ETIWANDA 9 \ \ \\
F 0 N T A N A
inte"h age Consish^g '
`l o'1It Nyld :)P 101, 11a 5outnV.,J ^d '
^j 4'
0 fied bV TrONir
\ pC
PJ \
'P
d
1`
\ wE
1�
r.1
\\ �E
o .
�\
�\� 2z
OF FREEWA
9 Y
p.
A/il IN,
EW
71
� I
A�
N 't, -� l 0
JARDINO
5�.
L RENT
=Y
N AT I ON A L
w,
a,
b
Ld
Chi
ZQ
FOREST
V
ti
�1
y
0
4,
VISEI
Sawa
RO,
--map C, i
4 "A•
S Rc
AI
SBD-
FREE
"NC COU N
I
,'IVERSIM-M
'tOUTE 14,
A RGUIS
LJT4 AND-4.
2000'
X�
' = VISED
�: , A6 IT A
u
•nt
�r y
V D
HEV.AY
•- ^13HWAY AND
n'
SEPARATION
_. J.:D CLOSURE
;!r
•
-�-� - "UNTY MASTER PLAN
WGHWOY
-AL'TnRNIA
r
I'-N .1,L N,.I
i
- 01 PJBLIC WORKS
OF HIGHWAYS
SBO 31 "PM ^0.0 -16.7
5- SBD- I5 -PM- 126 -13.6
I`REEWAY
3i - ' -- ->'C COUNTY t)0N TWEEN'
V'ERSIDE COUNTY LI "
y
oUTE IS NEAR DE
AND ;
`
N ROUTE 15 BETWE 'V`-'E
U''H AND 0.6 MI.NORT 01:
2000' 7r :t06sr "
A.
\� \
u
•nt
�r y
Dist. 08 - SBd -15 - PM - 0.0 -16.4
Dist. 08 - SBd -19 =s- PM - 16.7 -17.7
In SBd County on Rte 15 bet Riv
County Line and Rte 194 near Devore;
and on Rtel94 bet 0.4 mi S and 0.6 ml
N of Devore
SUPPLEMENTAL FREEWAY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEnNT, made and entered into on this.
day of _. ., ,,, , 19? ', by and between the STATE OF
;s.
CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the Department of Transportation
(herein referred to as "STATE "), and the County of San Bernardino
(herein referred to as "COUNTY ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, STATE and COUNTY have entered into a Freeway Agrcement
dated July 2, 1973, relating to that portion of State Highway Route 15
from Riverside County Line to Route 194 near Devore; and State High•r,e,y
Route 1% from 0.4 mile south to 0.6 mile north of Devore; and
WHEREAS, the plan of construction, as shown on Exhibit A attached
to said Agreement, has been altered in certain respects since the
execution of said Agreement; and
WHEREAS, a new plan map has been prepared showing the altered
plan of construction;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. That the plan map attached hereto, marked Revised Exhibit A,
shall be substituted for Exhibit A attached to the Freeway Agreement
dated July 2, 1973, and become a part of said Agreement for all purpo3e6.
2. That except for the substitution of the revised plan map,
said Freeway Agreement dated July 2, 1973, shall remain in full force
and effect, unmodified by any provisions of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supple-
mental Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized
officers.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
HOWARD ULLRICH
Director of Transportation
By
Ch.d Deputy Director
AF 'D:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Attorney (State)
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNA]?;)!:d:,
By
Chairman, lloaM 0{ F10:1f
Llot"A RA.-P0P11M. CFs IF PI:
eowKc OF suvcw so. s OF I �7
COUNTY OF MN 9rR';',P.'3 I,) •
ATTEST: QV* Lln-: . . .. .. . . . . .....
Clerk, floard Of
Supervisors
\ S COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
^� CONTRACT TRANSMITTAL
One ❑ E
FMrr
n Emoi rver ln=
2
gevri °t Il cnnlraa Fas mme ,fan onr. naYmenr or reiapt.
__ eumnl<re tM lo�lro. ing.
N„mlur of yavmpmv ___
Esbmamd a�nm�m or ra'+ 5
Contractor: ,�1ya_peulLt_r�nt_pfT,,,, rertati,n _
Contractor's Representative: �•.1V19r Smi th.Iles' tit E:nt.:i.neer _
Address: Post Office Box 231, San Bernarding, CA 92403 Phone: 383 -4616
Nature of Contract. WWII, desrebe the general terms of rho conrrdetl
This is a "Supplemental Freeway Agreement" between the State and
the County.
This agreement will provide for certain changes to the
Freeway Arrecmont dated July 2, 1973 and will make it consistent
with the construction plans which Ituve been prepared for the
timch .lane project which is in the State's 1975 -76 construction
budget.
(Attach this rransn; IW to all contracts not prcpa,ed on Mc "St., ... hvd Contract" /onu.l
Approvedji to Irnal.lnnn Hev,nyed as te. Irudncl
CW my Counsel Cuur nnAd n mU
isdhvc tllhee
s
GUASTI SST
sT o
lIII /s Freeway ra Freeway
m�
? y2 Trofi.c Intercno nqe Only \
No LOCO''. 'Rood Connections \
A ,\
C \
'o
2 p
l a A 9 \+
ti
t;a
{ v,Q
� 9G
pF � O
Mir
ETIWANDA
FONTANA
ePap�.
r"
Freeway to Freeway
Traffic interchange Only
No Local Road Connections
i
i
FR EEWA Y
SAN BERNARDIN
Initial Grade Separation
Future Ramps to be Constructed
When Justified Sy Traff',c /o umes
x
A GREEME
ERNARDINO
istructed
is to umes
NATIONAL
n
MENT
FOREST
r
Q
Ga>
'.1
ti;;
REVISED
EXHIBIT A
o ~ GRE PVE
n. T
':v w PVE
L E G E NJ D
O
�1 O INDICATES FREEWAY
O PV INDICATES COUNTY HIGHWAY AND
K OTHER STATE HIGHWAYS
INDICATES COUNTY HIGHWAY RELOCATION
CONNECTIONS, FRONTAGE ROADS AND
LOCAL ROADS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
INDICATES DEDICATED
L RIGHTS OF WAY
n 11 INDICATES GRADE SEPARATION WITH
INTERCHANGE FACILITIES
-4410 INDICATES GRADE SEPARATION (RR FOR RAiLRI
INDICATES ROAD CLOSURE
,1I INDICATES COUNTY MASTER PLAN
DEVORE MAJOR HIGHWAY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
m I DIST- 08 -SBD- I, -PM- 0.0-16.4
DIST- 08- SBO- IDA -PM- 16.'; -17.7
w FREEWAY
IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ON ROUTE 15 BETWEEN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY LINE
AND ROUTE 194 NEAR DEVORE
AND
ON ROUTE 194 BETWEEN
0.4 MI. SOUTH AND 0.6 MI. NORTH OF DEVORE
SCALE I == 2000' 1974
RANCHO CUCAMONGA-'SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
Legal Description
Beginning at the intersection of the east /west midsection
line and east line of Section 17 of Township 1 North, Range
West, San Bernardino Meridian;
Thence northerly along the east section line following the
east line of Sections 8 and 5 to the intersection of east and
north line of section 5;
Thence easterly along the north lines of Sections 4,3,2 and 1,
Township 1 North, Range 7 West and sections 6,5,4,3 and the
west half of section 2, Township 1 North, Range 6 West to the
intersection of the north line and north /south midsection line
of Section 2;
Thence southerly along the north /south midsection lines of
Sections 2,11,14 and 23, Township 1 North, Range 6 West to the
intersection of the midsection line and south line of Section
23;
Thence Westerly along the Rancho Cucamonga City Boundaries.
RESOLUTION OF APPLICIMN BY a
GOVERNING BODY OF PU C ENTITY
TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR _AFC USE ONLY
COUNTY OF SAN CF I' ARDINO
1111 East Mill Street
San Bernardino, California 92415
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council __. AS GOVERNING BODY OF
The City of Rancho Cucamonga HEREBY SUBMIT AN
APPLICATION FOR:
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION
REORGANIZATION
WHEREAS. THE Rancho Cucamonga City Council AS
GOVERNING BODY OF the City of Rancho Cucamonga DESIRES
TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION N ACCORD-
ANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE, SECTION' 56195
NOW,THF.PEFORF.THE Rancho Cucamonga City Council
GOVERNING BODY OF the City of Rancho Cucamonqa DOES HERE-
BY RESOLVE, DETERMINE. AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. APPLICATION AND A PROPOSAL IS HEREBY MADE TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMA-
TION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR _ 3115 . aoe5 to the
north of Rancho Cucamonga TO BE IiSO "•!N AS
The Sohere of influence for Rancho Cucamonga AS OUTLINED N
THE JUSTIFICATION FORM WHICH IS EXHIBIT "A" TO THIS RESOLUTION AND IS BY THIS REFERENCE
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH,
SECTION 2. THE Planning Staff _OF THIS
GOVERNING BODY IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS PESO -
LUTION WITH THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
(NAME)
(OFFICE)
OF wr
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY CERTIFY THIS RECORD TO BE A FULL, TRUE, AND
CORRECT COPY OF THE RECORD OF THE ACTION TAKEN BY SAID GOVERNING BODY, BY VOTE OF THE
MEMBERS PRESENT, AS THE SAME APPEARS IN THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF SAID GOVERNING BODY AT
ITS MEETING OF
DATED BY
LAIC 1 03- 1979 -471
" 7/77
0 0
EXHIBIT "A"
JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSAL AND PRELIMINARY For LAFC Use Only
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION FORM
TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
III I East Mill Street, 8.1
San Bernardino, CA 92415
INTRODUCTION: The questions in this form are designed to obtain enough data about the proposed project and project
site to allow the staff and LAFC to adequately assess the project. By taking the time to fully respond to the questions below,
you an reduce the processing time for your project. You may also include any additional information which you believe is
pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary.
APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga
TYPE OF PROJECTOR ACTION: Designation of Sphere of Influence
GENERAL LOCATION: /Cross semen, area, erc.l North of The City Boundaries
If there is an existing EIR or other environmental review on your project site, give the name and date it was written, and
provide this office Win a copy of the findings: EIR for Incorporation on Alta Loma (LAFC
#1613) Incorporation of Tri— Communities (LAFC #1608): December 21, 1976.
A. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION:
1. Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. Identify the project, including annexations to,
detachments from, or formation of newentities.
a. The reasons which justify this proposal are as follows: (For example - service needs, health mandate, economic
See Attached
Is. Services to be added, changed or provided, and major projects proposed:
111 Without additional cost to
(2) With additional service charges
LAFC 3
0 0
A DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
Proposal:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is requesting the establishment
of a thirty -one and one -half square mile Sphere of Influence
contiguous to the City's northern boundary. The area in question
extends two miles into the San Bernardino National Forest. Ap-
proximately three - sixths of the land is in Federal ownership,
two - sixths in private ownership, and one -sixth in other govern-
mental and public utility owenership. Undeveloped with mostly
mountainous terrain, the area provides a mountain vista for the
City below.
Services:
The area lies entirely within Cha£fey Joint Union High School
District, Alta Loma and Etiwanda Elementary School Districts,
the County Municipal Court System: Rancho Cucamonga Division
and the County Superior Court System: Ontario Division. It
lies partially in the Foothill Fire District, U.S. Forest Ser-
vice District and the Cucmaonga County Water District.
The Foothill Fire Department has indicated that the establish-
ment of this Sphere of Influence would have no significantly
negative impact on the District since the area is currently
undeveloped. The District has already begun to purchase needed
equipment to service the area. No tax increase or special fee
is expected to be necessary.
Cucamonga County Water District's future plans limit its po-
tential service boundaries to approximately one -half mile within'
the National Forest Boundary. Most of the private land falls
below this line. The District does not feel there will be any
significantly negative impact on the District as a result of
the establishment of the Sphere of Influence. Since any future
expansion of services would occur at the expense of the devel-
oper and /or future homeowner, no change in the tax rate for
present residents is expected.
Furthur Justification:
Eleven square miles of the area is in private ownership and
could be developed at any time. Any development would have
both a service and visual impact on the City. Because of this
impact and potential for development in the future, the City
feels that they must have a hand in regulating use and development
in the area.
(3) Only after additional capital outlay to be paid by property owner
See Attached
c. Are there other alternatives toproviding services: not approving any development
d. List all other governmental agencies and private municipal services in the area: Foothill Fire District ,
Cucamonga County Water District, Chino Basin Municipal Water District;
Alta Loma, Etiwanda, Cucamonga and Central School Districts.
e. TO BE COMPLETED FOR PROPOSALS TO FORM NEW DISTRICTS OR CITIES
(1) Services and major projects to he provided by proposed agency in first and second years of operation:
(May be attached as an exhibit)
The service districts are independent from the applicant, City of
Rancho Cucano ga These districts will o ov;1 --d— c they become
necessary
(2) Proposed budget for first two years of agency's existence, including all revenues and expenditures. Attach
proposed budget sheets as Exhibit "B" toproposal request. not available at this time
Call City
(3) Estimated tax rate for first two years of agency's existence.
36C 36C
First Year Second Year
B. AREAINFORMATION
1. Land area in square miles or acres 33 square miles
2. Dwellingumuinarea In ED 1127 or Census Tract 92:288 occupied, 197 vac.
(Mostly in Lytle I
3. Population in area ED 1127:629 (Very little in the area in question)
4. Amount of publicly owned land in area fldererify as federal, state or local)_ two thirds
5. Assessed valuation: Land
• •
3. Describe site alterations that will be produced by improvement projects associated with proposed action. For
instance, topographic changes, percentage of site that will be graded, storm flows that will have to be channelized,
and other changes. Also, indicate any new services or utilities that will be required.
4. Identify any other agencies that you have contacted during the processing of the project. Include copies of
correspondence with state, federal, or local agencies or departments where proposed project is discussed.
Alta Loma and Etiwanda School Districts, County Fire Warden
Cucamonga County Water District.
5. Please include a copy of any studies (soils, geology, marketing, etc.) that you may have prepared for this project or
site. All reports will be returned to you at the end of the Project's review, if requested.
F. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS — List below the names and addresses of people to whom notices and
communications should be directed. (3 maximum)
Name—
Address
City and
e Attached
Name _
Telephor
Address _.. _.__
City and
SUBMITTED BY:
City and
Nameand Title: Marianne Cordova: Planner, West Valley Team
Address: 1111 Mill St. Bldg. #1
City and Zip: Sa. Pernardino• CA 92415
Telephone: 383 -3684
Date: 6/1/78
TO BE ENCLOSED WITH THIS FORM: 13 copies of this Exhibit "A"
25 copies of the map
40 copies of the legal description
I copy of the Voter Location List
1••)••a4ea Me. a /li PaM40fa
6. Number of Registered Voters
C. VOTER INFORMATION — Proposal will not be accepted without a voter location list properly and completely filled
out by proponent. Enclose Voter Location List with this application.
O. LAND USE
1, Current Zoning R-1 amd M -1
2. Pre-zoning (Azigned by cities only)
3. Currentlanduse some residential, mostly vacant
4. County General Plan designation Open Space and Agriculture
5. City General Plan designation f /yapplicable) - - --
6. Probable or proposed land use (Submit any available plans) open Space, hillside — residential
E. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Describe the site as thoroughly as possible.
a. Describe the types of vegetation and the percentage of the site that is covered. List the animals you have seen of
those which are known to inhabit the area. Ths' —Sesta g; prPtinminAntAy L hard nFaparral
with some streamside woodland. Fauna in the area include small
populations of coyote, skunk, squirrel, opossum, raccoon, bobcat,
b. Describe the topography (i.e., slopes and landforms) of the sne: Any data on soils and geology will also
be helpful. Much of the area has an average slope of 158
c. Describe any improvements on the site. None
2, Describe the adjacent land uses. Note any major local agencies which are . Jjacent to the proposed project. Where
possible, provide a vicinity map showing the project site's relationship to these agencies. The area
in question is bounded on the north, east and west by predominantly
vacant land. To the south is some residential use existing within the
City Limits of Rancho Cucamonga.
a6atl4aA Rava /fa a40304
0 0
F. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS -
1. Foothill Fire District: Chief Billings (987 -2535)
6627 Amethyst
Rancho Cucamonga 91701
2. Cucamonga County Water District: Lloyd Michaels(987 -2591
9641 San Bernardino Road
Rancho Cucamonga 91730
3. Alta Loma School District: Floyd Stork (987 -0766)
9350 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga 91730
4. Etiwanda School District: Carl Lightfoot (899 -1706)
9625 Etiwanda Ave.
Rancho Cucamonga 91701
5. County Firewarden: Rex Griggs (822 -1227)
3800 Sierra Way
San Bernardino 92405
Arl
'
/ }0
..
�•
.♦
�.3
a.
it R•
c,.
n
. �
v
Y/: t
I
(
i
r
::.
r. w'_
.,.
��
1. �•. ... _ '.. -.
��
I
r�' �`�
♦ .
ire
r
-
,,'kr'
Iy,••� ......... . ....
•�.
IN
-. •.h
"` �'6,.�. v^. � '•vy'
Esc
-:
{
....i ..�: n
�n n n
a
- .,
i
d,': T
I 0
N.� A L �a ''. F.
I^
•'
y
1
I.
-•__j
....�t
ti
t
1
y.
•
I
i ._ Iti • i
IE .. � -
C �
0
i
I^
1
I.
-•__j
....�t
ti
y.
•
I
i ._ Iti • i
IE .. � -
-'- ^-yeti, .•.` I
••r'I ;i� '.
I
1
� .
i' 1
it
C �
0
This item is forwarded,to you for your presentation to the City Council:
TRACT 9240, Release Bond (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located north of Banyan Street between
Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue.
Owner: Prado Woods Corp.
1156 North Tustin Avenue
Orange, California 92667
Performance Bond (water): $16,000.00 Surety
Note: The above bond has been approved for release by
the Department of Environmental Health Services.
TRACT 9109 - Accept Roads (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located south of 19th Street between
Ramona Avenue and Hermosa Avenue.
Owner: Bob Jensen Builders, Inc.
226 West "E" Street
Ontario, California 91762
Note: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is
recommended that the roads be accepted. The improvements
include curb and gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street
Signs.
J y N R. SHONE
JRS:JPC:SM:ls
9A #a
OITER- OFFICE
METRO
DATE
may 31,
y
1978
=`T`
'- Hx euxeeoiw
FROM
JOHN R.
SHONE,
Acting City Engineer PHONE
383 -1203
TO
LAORE -N
WASSERMAN, City Manager
City of
Rancho
Cucamonga
SUBJECT
MATTERS
TO BE
CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
This item is forwarded,to you for your presentation to the City Council:
TRACT 9240, Release Bond (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located north of Banyan Street between
Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue.
Owner: Prado Woods Corp.
1156 North Tustin Avenue
Orange, California 92667
Performance Bond (water): $16,000.00 Surety
Note: The above bond has been approved for release by
the Department of Environmental Health Services.
TRACT 9109 - Accept Roads (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located south of 19th Street between
Ramona Avenue and Hermosa Avenue.
Owner: Bob Jensen Builders, Inc.
226 West "E" Street
Ontario, California 91762
Note: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is
recommended that the roads be accepted. The improvements
include curb and gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street
Signs.
J y N R. SHONE
JRS:JPC:SM:ls
9A #a
SUBJECT :PATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
This item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City Council:
TRACT 8956, Accept Roads (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located at the southwest corner of
Banyan Street and Carnelian Street.
Owner: Lewis Homes of California
924 West 9th Street
Upland, California 91786
Note: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs.
TRACT 9131, Accept Roads and Release Improvement Security
Located on the south side of Banyan Street (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
between Sapphire Street and Jasper Street.
Owner: Sim Development Co.
3661 Spruce Street
Newport Beach, California 92660
Faithful Performance (Road): $182,000.00 Letter of Credit
Note: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs.
JOHN R. SHONE
JRS:JPC:SM:ls
9Cr'P
I*TER- OFFICE
ME*
o .r
DATE
May 31,
1978
u. en.naoiw '
FROM
JOHN R.
SHONE, Acting City Engineer PHONE 383 -1203
TO
LAUREIN WASSERMAN, City Manager
City of
Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT :PATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
This item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City Council:
TRACT 8956, Accept Roads (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located at the southwest corner of
Banyan Street and Carnelian Street.
Owner: Lewis Homes of California
924 West 9th Street
Upland, California 91786
Note: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs.
TRACT 9131, Accept Roads and Release Improvement Security
Located on the south side of Banyan Street (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
between Sapphire Street and Jasper Street.
Owner: Sim Development Co.
3661 Spruce Street
Newport Beach, California 92660
Faithful Performance (Road): $182,000.00 Letter of Credit
Note: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs.
JOHN R. SHONE
JRS:JPC:SM:ls
9Cr'P
1
10TER- OFFICE MEP
DATE May 24, \9 -8 i�r eci:emrvo
FROM JOHN R. SHONE, .Acting City Engineer PHONE 383 -1203
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
This item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City Council:
TRACT 9080, Adopt Resolution (Rancho Cucamonga)
Located on the North side of Hillside Road
between Jasper Street and Topaz Street.
Owner: Griffin Development Co.
P.O. Box 488
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Attached hereto is a suggested Resolution of Acceptance of all
streets within Tract 9080, except Vicars Drive, into the City
Street System. Subject streets have been approved as being
constructed in accordance with the approved Road Improvement
Plans on file with the County Transportation Department. Vicars
Street has been offered for dedication as a future street and a
cash trust in the amount of $2,400.00 deposited to guarantee the
completion of improvements consisting of roadway grading, place-
ment of A.C., curb and gutter and barricade at a future date.
j7 l
JQHN R. SHONE
JRS:JPC:JEM:ls
n C,'
qL(
I
N:tL��E�r�rt
\SU
SNu
i-
SIL:]O- IT
v_L':.ap
\ • ?r r'
S`l�_I
(III T
11.(
I:t 0
I(I :1._I
�\\
P•FEC °:..00 OR 16:49
50
\ E-S
LEVON
!3, 21
1LSal LERO 'R
CT
"_
DA RD
AR ?ALDCSa
W
CT C
xa
nr
it��
,III`
CT
<N.1v
sr
H
Yl
o
6 75410
RANCHO
GAROENIA ST SCS B
ROSEBUD J( ycLO•N E, R_ST
I
N:tL��E�r�rt
\SU
SNu
i-
SIL:]O- IT
v_L':.ap
\ • ?r r'
S`l�_I
(III T
11.(
I:t 0
I(I :1._I
�\\
P•FEC °:..00 OR 16:49
RANCHO
GAROENIA ST SCS B
ROSEBUD J( ycLO•N E, R_ST
HlLLSIDE
\SU
RAN CNO IT
i-
>''nI' >
\ • ?r r'
S`l�_I
(III T
11.(
I:t 0
I(I :1._I
�\\
1543
50
\ E-S
LEVON
LN
� RD
;18150
HlLLSIDE
ORCHARD
RAN CNO IT
ba]a5
697850
61]]00
Tract
881300 J
CUCAMONGAgO
AL SgT OJGVi
n
)ASTER IN a
J NORSE
MOON CTF, n LNC-- -
¢
N O a
O w IO
¢ 5 <
a BANYAN
O ( T'O njII1IIO �OII �d W
O
� a W
O O O m O w
O 4 O N > F
ne c Sol RSET OR
ORANGE 615550 ST J
W
>
¢ ° 11SS00
W
.:A :n p `
450
�O
q 124650 W
P a
cY0 c�a
_ Y_m
i5i09�
COTTON NOODWY
is297�0
11 �
r LMANZANITA DR
RURAL
ST
I
AVE . t
INTER- OFFICE MEIN
DATE May 15, 1978
FROM JOHN R. SHONE
Acting City Engineer
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN
City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
PHONE 383 -1203
ux sun6nurvo j
SUBJECT NATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NAME ROAD AREA MINOR SUBD. NO.
Robert S Karen Hellman Avenue 6 Rancho Cucamonga 77 -0655
Packer Foothill Blvd. (Parcel 4 only)
An Instrument of Credit and Agreement form in the amount of $10,900.00
is being pasted for the convenience of the owner and is for road
improvements as shown on the above minor subdivision.
It is therefore requested that the Instrument of Credit and Agreement
be presented to the City Council for acceptance.
JOHN R. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
JRS:JPC:S2:pc
�a -Wilkie,
s•a- � � - f.r
UPLAND SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
I.. Nenl, Vp:en4, Cel 91706 7,4 362 1516
• �••• May 4, 1978
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.
This will serve as notice and agreement that Upland Savings and Loan
Association, a financial institution subject to regulations by the State
or Federal Government, holds on deposit the necessary amount of
$10, 900. 00, pledging these funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for payment of labor and materials on a project of Robert Packer or
Karen K. Packer known as Minor Subdivision No. 77 -0655, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, according to that agreement dated
, between City of Rancho Cucamonga and
Owners as above stated.
The Ten Thousand Nine Hundred and no /100 ($10, 900.00) will be disbursed
upon authorization and direction of a duly authorized representative of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
This agreement shall expire either upon disbursement to the City or upon
acceptance by the City of that portion of the aforementioned work secured
by this instrument.
Very truly yours,
President
This agreement approved:
Fp �.
ACCEPTED:
City Council, City of Rancho Cucamunlea
I 0 0
A Cy R E E M E N T
Plot PlanfMinor Subdlvision/Mobilehome Park
This AGREEMNf, made and entered into this
day Of
19__, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, State
of California, hereinafter called the "' CITY ", and
hereinafter called the' "OWNER".
WITNESSETH
FIRST: That the OWNER for and In consideration of the permission granted
by the CITY• to construct certain improvements within public rights of way in
01st certain Parcel known as Minor Subdivision No. " -0655 (Parr 141
hereby agrees at his (its) own cost and expense, to furnish all required equip-
ment, labor and material, and before the expiration of two years from the date
tie reof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner the following
work and improvements, to wit: Construct road imorov menu
and Foothill Blvd. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Said construction shall
include; 596 linear feet of curb and gutter; 300 linear feet of sidewalk;
one driveway approach; 320 linear feet of concrete block wall; engineering and
staking; all necessary paving and grading.
and do all work incidental thereto. Said Standard Drawings and Specifications are
on file in the office or the Acting City Engineer ' and are hereby made a
part of this agreement, and said work and improvements shall be done under the
supervision and to the satisfaction of said Acting City Engineer OWNER
hereby agrees to pay for all inspection of the work as required by the CITY . The
estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of TEN THOUSAND NINE
HUNDRED S no/ 100---------------- - - - - -- Dollars ($.10,90U.00
SECOND: The CITY , the Acting City Engineer- and all officers and
employees of the CITY shall not be accountable in any manner for any lose of or
damage to the work or any pert thereof; for any of the materials or equipment used
or employed in performing the work; for any injury to any person or persons, either
workmen or anyone employed by him; or for any inturiep or damages to person and
property the OWNER or his contractor having control over such work mat properly
guard against.
THIRD; The OWNER shell indemnify and hold harmleoa the CITT „ the A;tina
City Engineer and all officers and employees of the CITY from all suite or
actions of every name, kind, or description brought for, or as a result of any
tn)urles or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the
OWNER, his contractor or agent" or employees of their, in the performance of the
work herein.
• 0
FOURTH: It is further agreed that the OWNER will at all times, up to the comple-
tion and acceptance of said work or improvements, givr. E..ad cr.l adegeate warning to
the traveling public of every defective and dangerous ro,tditlon existent within public
rights of way, and will protect the traveling public from said hazardous conditions.
It is understood and agreed that until the completion of all required improvements,
the subject road or roads shall wt be accepted into the City Maintained Road System.
OWNER may, with approval of the Acting City Engineer , close all or portions of
any street when deemed necessary to protect the tras•eltng public during the construc-
tion and /or installation of the required improvements.
FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties her'et o, that the OWNER will furnish
good and sufficient bonds in an amount not less than the estimated cost of said work
and Improvements as specified herein for the payment and faithful performance of the
terms and conditions of this contract. Said bands m.+•• be In one or more of the follma-
ing forms: '(1) cash deposit, (2) bond by one or more July authorized corporate sure-
ties, (7) instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to
regulation by the State or Federal goverment pledging that the funds necessary to meet
the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for palmient and agreeing that the funds
designated by the instrument @hall become cruet funds for the purposes as set forth
above. Should said securities become insufficient, the OWNER agrees to provide supple-
mental surety as required within ten days of notification. All bonds shall remain in
full force and effect until all work is completed and accepted by the CITY.
SIXTH: It is further agreed by and between the parties hereto, including the
surety or sureties on the bonds attached to this agreement, that in the event it is
deemed necessary to extend the allowable construction time for the completion of the
work as required under this agreement said extension may be granted or denied by the
City Council and such Action shall in no way affect the validity of this agree-
ment or release the surety or sureties on the bonds attached hereto., In the event of
such extension of time for completion of the work required hereunder, the CITY may
re- estimate the value of incompleted work based upon current unit prices and adjust
bond amounts accordingly as required, and in the event that the CITY brings suit
against OWNER for alleged non - compliance with this agreement and judgment is recovered,
OWNER shall pay all costs incurred by CITY in bringing such suit, including a reason-
able attorney's fee, to be affixed by the court.
ATTEST:
Clerk of the 'City of
Rancho Cucamonga
JOHN R. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
RY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Mayor
1
(Signature of Principal)
Ulit; nature of Principal)
By.._._
7oputy
`(ti ilia)'
M
m
•
u
0
O
l
or
l
Fbc Cucamonga Vineyard Iracl, Sob "d"
MU ?0 <U
0.0
ICOrH«._
E3
6U.y°
I
ii)
Ll
Cap
Par Cucamonga Vineyard Tract, Sub °B° 1,1.8 20145 ca�,1., - - t >'
33 E,p`•
-SAN BERNARDIND
5 1. . _.
It
nl
I
• ESigCIA
o
e lz'� s (ilro : C,u�. i,D u;.: ie" i5l "i If, t 1I IF I I
632 - ------- - - - - -� — - - - i
I
I
i I
. is .. Irzur fq 9d'JI IdN 130.6:.,46
Zd1 Por 5: ^I /1 °AC 3. 8co1 03 n3
I15. 16.11.. .rt n._�. •,. .. ..` ^:'Y.
-39
-. .12i..
30 x..
h
31 t
-�'
2!
2 43 t
N d5—
S)REEI /
F
.
o
e lz'� s (ilro : C,u�. i,D u;.: ie" i5l "i If, t 1I IF I I
632 - ------- - - - - -� — - - - i
I
I
i I
. is .. Irzur fq 9d'JI IdN 130.6:.,46
Zd1 Por 5: ^I /1 °AC 3. 8co1 03 n3
I15. 16.11.. .rt n._�. •,. .. ..` ^:'Y.
1-
IRTER- OFFICE ME*
DATE May 17, 1978 w�isw
FROM JOHN R. SHONE PHONE 383 -1203
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUBJECT MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
This item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City
Council:
Attached is a Quitclaim Deed from the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
various owners of record, negating a Drainage and Flowage Easement,
granted to the County of San Bernardino in accordance with re-
quirements of Minor Subdivision 76 -0519, filed by Mr. Dan August,
with the County Planning Department. The subject Drainage Easement,
recorded July 8, 1977, is shown in orange on the attached print.
On November 3, 1977 the County Flood Control District completed a
review of Minor Subdivision W77 -0410 and determined that the drainage
course is located westerly of the area covered by this Easement.
After execution of this Quitclaim Deed, the same area will be re-
dedicated for future road purposes based on County Planning Depart-
ment recommendations that involve two (2) minor subdivision ap-
plications and Parcel Map requirements.
It is requested that the City Council approve execution of this
Quitclaim Deed by the Mayor and upon completion of the action, please
request the City Clerk to forward the Deed to the County Recorder
for recordation.
HN R. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
WLT: j
Attachments: as noted
cc: Cy Zermeno - Land Development
Lou Gamache - Flood Control Di-t.
County Planning Department - West Valley Team
Surveyors Office - Parcel Map Section (PM 3976
and PM 4370)
9G
1
e 0 a.]
Order NO
Escro•.v No
Loan No
WHEN RECORDED '.!Art TO
'.IAIL f. SATE, ?!EP iS �In
•
•
I
'tPACF. ABOVE THIS LINE FOn RECORDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX a ...... No....................................... I
.,.. cump„ted on me consrtleranon o. value of property cameyw: OR
.,, eomou tee on the conutlerenon or wawa :nx bens pr encvmbnnca
remu mg at tme of sale.
s.anat'_ra at e.un ant Or Aeem amen -, me tae - Firm \ame
A.P. 1051 -281- 09,09,10
CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED
NO TAX DUE
FO"* A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of •.vlvcn is nereby acknowledged, the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
aoefawarhi n organized under :ne Idws of the State of California ,does hereby
REMISE,RELEASE AND OOITCLAIP.1 to DANIEL AUGUST, ROBERT SLATINSRY, ROY BGRCHETT and JOHN
KARCHINSh'Y, as their interests appear of record,
the real property In time City of Rancho Cucamonga
County of San Bernardino State of California, described as
The Rest :0.00 feet of Parcel No. 1 of PARCEL 2LAP S0. 3222, as per map recorded in Book 29
of Parcel 4a; s, page 34, Records of Said Countv conveyed to the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
for Drainage and Flowage purposes, by instrutnent recorded July 8, 1977 in Book 9215,
page 167, Official Records of said Countv.
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
as.
On_ - - -.. _
before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
State, personally appeared
known to me to be the _ _ _ President, and
known to me to be the _ _ Secretary of
the corporation that executed the within instrument, and known
to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on
behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged! to me
that such unpri executed the Within Instrument pronouns to
its bylewa or a resolution of Its board of directors,
WITNESS my hand aM official A.
SlgnaNn
By:
Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
(This as for officbl rotates si
1146110M91
Par Cucamonga
Homestead
ASSOCiotion,
M.B.6146
Ano Loma
1061 -28
t
Tax Code Area
-
--- -�
5212
ii44
�-
PHOTO
REDUCTION
y
00 NOT
SCALE
v
`�—
Pori
� _ --
_Yar2
V
W
z
J
zra a
i
A
\ z
J Q"
Par 1
-
i
�
AuGOST � SGw TiN9KY
291
_
5
y
Q-
21
1&
3
mar
4
F3UQCNE7 ->
Port
C
•
V
l9
vC
'J] cr
cry
p
e
,
.VS,PGH /NSKY
33
271
evsao
R
ASSelSar'S Map
l3ir
W rz /M /n
EL
Par N E 114, Sea - 21
Book 1061, Page
.:
r q, -
�'nrcel no D'[' r m 29/34
T IN ,R 7W.
San Bernardino County
v.:- v6
Farce: Map Na 71P FM 6/71
i • GdNSFN�
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
Gu ecawaoiv3
DATE April 28, 1978
�r 3
FROM d[Dcuglas Payne, Associate Planner, Ext. 3685
West Valley Planning
TO Lauren Wasserman, cc: R.C. City Council
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager City Clerk
Extension of Withhold Zone Change - For Council Action
SUBJECT Louis Bennett, Index No. W96 -66, Rancho Cucamonga (Routine)
Applicant Louis S. Bennett, Index No. W96 -66, Rancho Cucamonga,
j.�s repuestiaq -.an. extension of time to meet the deadline for
submitting a development plan. A copy of this letter requesting
said extension is attached.' '
The Board of Supervisors, on November 22, 1976, at public
hearing, acted to approve a zone change on the northwest
corner of Archibald and 19th Street from A -1 -5 to C -1 -T.
The Board further directed that the adoption of the enabling
ordinance be withheld for a period of two and one half years;
one and one half years for the submittal of a development
plan and one year additional in which time building permits
must be issued and construction started and diligently pur-
sued to completion. The date by which the applicant must
submit a development plan is May 22, 1978.
The applicant is requesting an extension of time to comply
with the conditions of the withhold zone, as his developer
is working on plans and expects to submit them in the near
future.
Recommendation: Approve a one year extension of time for
the submittal of a development plan with the expiration date
of May 22, 1979.
9=-
37irch 29, 1978
Er. Tommie Stevens
San Bernardino Planning Department
1111 East !-Sill Street Bldg. 1
San Bernardino, Calif. 92415
hE: Index No. 96 -66
Ceor Stevens:
It has come to our attention that the with-
hold on our property at Archibald and 19th Street in
Alta Lana, Index No. 96 -66, will expire in ,'.ay, 1978.
'ae resr;ectfully ask for %r:i extension, ns our
dev ^ioper is •,:orking deligently on i,i:; :.lans m d in-
:,ends '-o aubmit ti, in the very nQ.,r future.
,!e arc enclosing c, cnec'r, for ,;50.,,3 to pay the
extension fee.
Thank you for your past 'help.
Sincerely yours,
Louis S. Sennett
'.��. Box 156
;.ita Lmvi, Calif. yi'!ul
ATES OF THE BOARD OF SUPER`!I*
OAN BERNAP•DING COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
L. S.
TO C -1 -T;
-Ki' - t—pan?ic hearing on the petition riled by Louis S.
Eanlr�cj.' .,ting a change of zone from A -1 -5 to 0-1 for property
located r. o the northwest corner of Archibald and 19th Street in the
Alta Loma area. Notification as required has been nah by publication in
the Cnoamonga Times, a newspaper of general circulation and by mailing
of notices to mailing list on file in the office of tine Clerk.
Plan Irrplece_ntation Chief John Jaquess, presents the report of the Planning,
Co - mission, a copy of which is on file in the office. ofthe Clcrk. He
state, this subject parcel contains appro :;irately 7.u5 acres and abuts the
,area which will be the Foothill Freeway ri,,ht- c:f -aay should that freeway
be developad and he states that recent r_erraanon3 ^nee with Cal-Trans
indicate that they can make no cornitrant reraniing furuce right-of -say
in this area. He states the p,enaral plan for this co'- :unity which is t:he
:subject of a considerable number of in tae nest, in:!icatc,a the
pre ?arty to be neiShborhood cozzmercial us^ and hiF ;h density _esidcnti_al
with 12 to 20 dwalling- units per acre. He states tae remaest to C -1 is
cona:istent with the neighborhood co= ;arciai designation an,i he d :acribat:
the :,,onin ^. of the surroundin7 area. He states the araa is preanntly un.d^-
vclol,, d all hough th surrounding area is transitio irf; rather quickly iato
single a;.;ily rasidence and he refers to t,,- ntar.i ^_r o` acplicatlon recoiveu
for single family development in the vicinity. 11.3 siate3 the
Con%113sl.Jl rccOml9end'ed C -1 for the StiDject prOP driy with a (Char O° iiTn
s tanaarc'.a -.lhich ha 'read,- to th•_ hoard and it elfalold of the Enab
Ordinance ;:ors t:,o year period. PIr. Jnquc - lac,. th- ,:alicant •ecd
the Lt;^ th!,ol d not be condiL'ion and . tit` alga or: ,cc be 'Mont•+ titl.s
lots'. . Jn.gao,= ..ells to t'an Board'• ..`to ^tinn •c,....
the Ih. ^.t two
cen'_cr: rcquos.tn ::• rc :)roved on the pre,; rty to the ._ st and thr_ :nuthene:,
both rc tor._ .,ndcd for wvithi!old o`. the 1 "aablinp, 0° .aa• - •,! , -.•ra
= `- t' ;cne::,. .e:h :era cv_ ntiy
go-W; t'ctrou h the ste.pz to proceed with the e- vr_lo;a :n :t and the adoption of
file o;: di- ;:epee, He states no opposition either in ;:ritiag or oral pr.;poatod
to tc.t proposed cone change.
County Counsel IL.Crane Kitchel advises the lSOard it take: an actinn
to npnrC,Ve t11e zone change the finding, of consietency with the Zen.crel
Plan ru,t ba made dua to the acbiguoue l.m^ua,,;a of the minutes of thn
P1;,nuinP Co.misolon• Planning Director Konnoth Tenpin^ coarents that ii:
may hav,= bean ambi —Uoua in the staff report and tlr n autot:at.i.celly pic± ail
un bi the secretary without the intention of the to inacatc t1hi3
is not consistent with the general plan. Tile_ C: _m;.s:, i:;n f ^it thin a 'rood
locstioa. for ec�arcial use and intended that the n,nbject parcel. and�tLe�
other threw corners were good locatioas for cocr.•narci -al,
IL ^ou,,, Ilonr. disco ^_s the 'T' standard relati.: to tint distant-1 . -or the
center lii, for scthacks and states they ;eould nrefcr. that tit^_ canlL :4on�
not 'i.Oe;c in" it ;;Prcifi.c di.meas:ion but leave tl: 5't: apn;'ovai to t'ba
Corrvssion arid he is aura that this can be wor'. ; : :ciJont with
state; T ;a :Cn opponi.tion to it vithaold of the. bliue Ordi.n.,nce hat
every t±ehlwld r ;rant-nd for tha area has b ^_er, thr1•snb.1cct of cons" ; -I,1 !�'�)1.
to the fact that it to %o,; .!psu:o::il.�ae,y of %V vcar to
atwnhi ,:.. _.;v_cr 1ea;e .nd -related d:a> :ys.
^ : ;Mle 0 It o`
;n fo.:cc develo�- irtu n 1,a3 .,'!y
rapid act-'nn, 11a , :Dlllri
net W: co be iliac;• and make ana.p decl.siona.
Sap ^_rvi.r.or Kamer. sky 3.r.;:uares what would happoa e d::•✓E•io[, °ant: t: n':
more Clola tclo vp., irs, 11;d t!V'X� is a ,h C'.1 C.i(;V iO::m' th
d b'i t'i:fll: `.`Y!,. ':O i.ell C't ::'i',•
ocm rids. Pl.am .n? Direct0" ICennevh Topp:ior, st:!tec that uc.u.,0Ay ci.t n.;
na'. ;r: th:•ir OWn pla!hn following: review of t! 10. sitt:ntioa. llo rtr!t.C'n ii. ::a�i
• :! rn th rimy n. forr,ad, iu+tl tl:c. • ;, t.e it ?;, sl +.00,,, on t:l• n.%r)
th c;. .a.;!o1.d rnn!:1 be nu',>1c'c:_ to r.uvic... 'it'll 1' 'h el, ;:y
dire-
the crya.c',i- lna ;nryen: or if ti,ey a„' =c. d ao ;want i.tr• ,1:..,..n.,
• � i
'A Ile
RTES OF THE BC.,RD OF SUPERVIS0.
OF SAN BERNARDWO COUNTY, CALIFO,UW,,
Cont. Planning; Zoning; L.S. Bennett
He states the baci'' hazard exists with the possibility o£ havi.n- a future
Jurisdiction disa;rea ;;ith what is done now. Ila further states the with-
hold essentially states that if the dev'aloper fulfills certain conditions
the zoning; w111 b^_ adopted and this is a form of cocnitnent. ltr. };one then
talks of the potential risk in having their *.Mans almost 9D'/., complete by
Cie t;;o year and Chairman Hansberger states that this Hoard has never
turn. ^.0 Oo-.m a request for an extension of a zone changa :;here the anolicant
shows dili�oncc in pursuing the development. C}tair^an Hsnsber er states
he does not be.liece the danger is any 5reatcr here than in similar ratters
even if the wi.thhald is deleted; the potential of citvhood door not alter
this. 11r. Bone comments that the one year period within w'::iclj to complete
t`.?eir design is a little two tight. :Sr. Topping states this could "oa n"tda
18 months period and P:r. Hone states this would be better.
On call of the Chairman no opposition either in or oral is prvanted
to the proposed zone change or the conditions. On notion by Stpervi :;or
Kart :ins' ; ", duly seconded by Supervisor Smith and carriez, the Hoard o`
Supervisors hereby accents the recorrrendation of the Plannin,- C.^,r:niosl.on
and findin ?, the proposed :r.' <,e ehan-e petition to be cor:ai, tent with- tl %'a
m r
orel plan, hereby anorovo_s the subject petition for a change of ::one to
C -1 -T lath thn follo -7in "T" stendard3:
1. 11 "hat no build Og nendt be For r^ on �Qr
pl-operty until the location and davelopinent plan has been
re icw: ,d and approved by the rlan.in.7 Ccc : :ais ^ion.
I' np =ate building are to ba r_•• te or.
rl for the nnon, of
nnlr '_ease, or financing, a oubr'divi i.on shall be .Pill- :I for
review and approval,
2. That all buildings be Setback a nini-Tillm of savanty -`i.vo (75)
feet frci t1he centerline of Archibald en!:
no b!tildi.n s be constructed within these ninir.,un
3. That all buildi:tns be ceGback a ni.ninnm of one hunrlred (i0(ll
fot,t f;:om the ccctterli.ne of 1'lth Street, fort- = no b,iilr :lin�.-a
be. constructed within these minima, ratbacl-. Lroes.
k. All of :f- ctrcet rar'k.in<; and loading, arevo shall be st.resc - ^"
with z ninirnam of 2" A.C. paving, properly stripy.' to - L
o',-derly use and circulation.
5, fall, knit ?',�, prOV1c1^rl t0 i111lTllnt ;3 occ-ntrent p1 ?)!'!a, ^, a}.'1
loadini; area.p shall be so arraln-rcl to reflect li. `t;;!' cteay
F; -no f :..i. joining residential dcvelop:neni:s, is o:ell• r..O
awl hiP,inm s.
G. 1_V npnlinant ritall Submit a final!. p1m, ;tor
review and apnrotdnl. i.o :�in� tcinSt. :nel
nF Vi.ve (5) pa -!cant of the to=t nits: 1.nr10^.000 In
addition^., a verma *.unit irr1. ^ation otc'1- ah.ell bo i.r..;t:
..,mm, rr•,. i.ntJ,inc ;l in ^.ond oparatin,2 comlition. ',Idle
plan include' the parla:ay s,rea.
Street tine[ 'ri ;, i.m•im hen (1()) gallon nil.; on f0 ?:ch (40)
centers :hall Ne planted Talon^ right,. t.h �.!.!' Avrnan nnli
1901 Snmat rmd stall be rahmn %id W nrwmd rma !:h"
par 7By kept v OF 1fends. :� :urn p :r'V! ^,c,a1 :' 1.
,I:,Illc!J m. d poernhlr. irri+Wa Lon :CCS a'.vt',L ire 1nrvall.eJ.
„).or Arrhlh,ald Avrn:!_ and 19th Street.
I'
M
L.
MINUTES OF THE BOArD OF SLI,:'afmSORS
OF SAN BERNARDINNO COUNTY, CAIII-W!NIA
Cont. Planning; Zonint,; L.S. Bennett
7. 1; in at•e nth S rr� t and Arc%IiI,, ild . :jj:•o shall each be ncr niLted
to have a ria-.;iirau•i of thr_e (1) one (1) acces-,
dr;_Va shall b", dcvot�d to �Iclivc�:V vAlic�a;t trans-,c,rtir; goods
to an.-I from tl.c rear delivery (locals. -,s, �Iriv,,�,:; shall
All accn�
br. no closer than one linaelrcd Fi`zy (1,!i0) ft:_,t from the south-
west corner of the subject property mDacurud alon- the
f
resnCctive property lines. In addition, all ncczse, dfjv,3 are
to be a location and width standard approved by the County
Dopartm�nt of Transportation. Said access drives shall be at
least one hundred (100) feat apart.
8. A six (6) foot inasonry wall shall be constructed aloe; the
north and west- property lines of subject proporty. Said
wall to be re'u-cad to three (3) fas in height in the siat-
back area along 19th street and Archibald Avenue,
By the same motion, the Board of Supervisors directs that the adoption of
the Enabling Ordinance be withheld for a period of t-.,,o and one half yearn;
ono and a half years for the submittal oE a drvalo - =,=t Plan and one year
additional in waich tir.e• building permits mist be is.L2d and constru-Ition
started and dili,antly pursued to completion.
if this -is not
the prop,-y shall I %on--
.evert bacl; to its orill-inn! znning or to
appropriate by she Board of Supervisors; or, until -�hc '..r1 -C'ty
Plainnin., study is completed.
PASSIEM A'%T) ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
San Bernardino, State of California, by the following vote:
AMTS: SUPERVISMS: .IayHeld, !,a"aashy, Smith, liansberj.cr
STR'.1,1,_U_. S07S : None
ABSEN-: SUVE VISOaS: To•,m,q end
MhH ('A[ W:�NIA
1" 4
r
V T t 1
cc: Applicant L.S. BminctL T iu�1711i�,
iS L d G i L, y 1!,I)
C! 0"
CO■ ■ ae not dvbrh— rn vll m01.t ae Mat WrIIiMv. r.i.
v. A'tPyy',r�
1°L
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES) 1
1. TYPES) OF LICENSE(S) F
FILE NO.
To: Deportment of Alcoholic Beverage Control F
FEE
5
ON C,ALE C MARIL ,
••
GEOGRAPHICAL i
ihs
,n..v <r .rnvm. wunaNl :
:� =T(v�.' P(.A(119 G
The undersigned hereby spiritist, for N
Dore
N
licenses described mlollows: C
CondLClaneL OL I
Issued
2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) T
Temp. Permit
Applied under Sec. 24044
�• Show Type of aLicense Y 7 7. Are Premises Inside "?•
_ City Limits? Yes
RS Moiling Address (if diRerent from 5)- Number and $tree)
_ Per T.
9. Have you ever been convicted o(a felony? A COEPe 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Deportment pars. ;
taining to the Act? QI3
11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 an an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. ( �.
12. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of to
(b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Dale. . .... ..... .............. .... AF
/rVs"'Ustder pwalb el verivq. each Penen vhwe n...... as as.y blew, nrnM. end w :111 W n rM applicant, w em el IM ppplkpna, w
elF<w pl M appliwnl <urpwerinn, named in ". ".e.inp w"kaln'. dvlr .inherit"rle nwb dig epplimlrm an Ne .Mall; (tl IMI M Me read IM Iwo
eelnp epp6wlien end bnaw. rM ,menu rFwwl and Inca meM1 and ell al rM NmemeMr IFVem mN. are 1., (3) IFpI ne Mren alMr rMn IM yplkwN
pPoliwnb n enr dirwl er indnwr :moo :n me ep06 -11 appllmv, bvtinen re be and.cud vnder IM tk.—W far sheF this glkerien k weN
Idl IAer IFe Nane1N a.lpi< ion or preperN enrlw :r made la ane", IAe palmenl al a lean - 1. West a ..... enl en1eM Inro cape Mpn niwll INI r
dart pe-04m, rM day. pin'smith Ibe tr-6t application it rAlN wilt the N,el,em w b pain w eaablieA a gebnrne law Ise any rrNirw N . ydne b rl
hired ar ise, l'ryredilw'e((lxxl��nm4rw: 31 IMt the lmnd., appli <el:an mev M r;Ihnk wn by silts, Me .ppll<..r IM Ilrenw ."it m aussidne Iw4111r ayA
Me awiCANl 1' cLiReshor, Inc.
lrl. APPLICANT a
SLCN HERE r$YE�kr c _
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
15. STATE OF'CAIIFORNIAt•, County of "AN 113UIAMNID _ Date
Undo w^ Ir al Is,.... .vah Into, rhwe tignewI. ...rare ",a_, Issue and to t n polies airs., el I11 .stripI a II<enm 1•,
mm" in rM Len ai p rnnJ.r appllmrian, tluk av Fwaed 1 mlb. IliI ...... .r npplieelbn NanielkM1Mba1; 121 an he e Mnbr nwbe ep un Ny, rnM
all inlnol in rb. anmbed Ilnmelq 11ur:Aed We, and r nmbr me 1. rt. evpI:yinl and er loevlian indimbd a IM upper p.rrm .1 his oovanne•r (`
Iwm a n1h r nd.r evp. ei by tF. 0;......: (31 IN., nle. I.na..a lal n a r. n r r.n .
m me n We mw Inca ninor dwt r app n e r OrepalN 1 ntlrr it wt mN. r. tauelr Its pepm.M .1 . L.n .r 1e 1.1811
dine IN. dal a wsi,h IM ".III" ePpIi etia, a IArtl wish Me pPorans. Na Pin w nleblldl . t
,dxma I.I as nim .1, wNeo .1 a.ndver ar n A.Ir.ud at IN,. anlnerNilw A heneNrw; la me IM .only yers!"liwl " be, dawn by NIMe IM
yplimm w IM Linnte. w11h na n id ins Mbillry re IA. Os,en,, nL pr ' Mhp,1
16. Nome(s) of Licensae(s) 17. Signatures) of Licensee (s)- IN_ ., 1B:'lleao 4, Lai '
NM•ROtis INC. +lY 8 ' d
: 4?, *3 !27.
Is
.I
ury one up toae IT -) "It") Coun7"T n^- . t,,
M I
Do Not Write Belnm This Line; For Department Use Only
Attached: [){Recorded notice, '
El Fiduciary pope", )tj'" 1' °a °1. ;
/�
• � ...COPIES MAILED
rorxall i _..4._
❑ Retlewoh Fes of ..................bid of" ............................ _.... ........ .... Office on .......... .. ................. Receipt Nor
dKI noel
F
sY.
ury one up toae IT -) "It") Coun7"T n^- . t,,
M I
Do Not Write Belnm This Line; For Department Use Only
Attached: [){Recorded notice, '
El Fiduciary pope", )tj'" 1' °a °1. ;
/�
• � ...COPIES MAILED
rorxall i _..4._
❑ Retlewoh Fes of ..................bid of" ............................ _.... ........ .... Office on .......... .. ................. Receipt Nor
dKI noel
F
sY.
L`
BANKOFAMERICA
February 26, 1970
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.
.11is will serve as notice and agreement that flank of America NT&SA
0700 Baseline, Alta Loma, a financial instituti-.n subject to reg-
ulations by the State or Federal Government, holds on deposit the
necessary amount of .$3,200.00, pledginC these funds to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for payment of labor and materials on a project
of S E C Development (mown as Kinor Subdivision Ho, 77 -05$9, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, according to that agreement
dated , between City of Rancho
Cucamongaand owners as above stated.
'ihe Eight Thousand Two Hundred and no /100 ($0,200.00) will be dis-
bursed upon authorization and direction of a duly authorized represent-
ative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
This agreement shall expire either upon disbursement to the City or
upon acceptance by the City of that portion of the aforementioned
work socured by this instrument.
Very truly, yours,
F. Hentzschel
Manager
This agreement approved:
Date , s<: f• t"
ACCIEFf D
City Council, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Date 1 k
nApM OL nnirmmA rime ONnl iPUEI AND 9nVw GP n5cepnnIIi 1
•r • .
NVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY count, of Son Bernordino
grit •!R•.:T'.l'2TdISrJ'.r,.atr,; .. ,- :.RitAl+1E[
PLANNING DEPARTMENT K.nnetl,C Te ,,
1111 Est Mill Street, Bldg. 1 • San Bernardino, CA 92415 • 1714) 3931417 P1......... D,,ertn,
December 29, 1977
Doug Hone
9407 Valley view
Alta Loma, Ca. 91701
Re: Minor Subdivision No. 1177 -0559C
Dear Mr. Clone:
, • r r. '':-v "'r,I ti:at you !;.i no Subrli.vi.si.on ❑)p l.° c.+: i on ''.'.s
.•I� f`'1'Nn-, +;11'11,'! to your completion of. the ronuir Lir, nl ..
,;I e;' r.., •..i':o Ftt Frr�--d shoot (s).
•'W' tLa: San is rt',arr. i.no r•ounty Code, Soct:ior.
(;. - r ',11e. r,mgnt:. sPcr.ified on the uttarhrd shce`(s) :l. ..
1,; ('..) •:car of t.nr thr:. d9u of. this; 1, ?t:: or, ...
r,. .' •1 __ voi�.. !,n oxtension of til rof. ....
<l..r, r�l vr'- T. .y i'.eyr „ -anfcl ❑von written applirat:inr t.o th:rte
I'I, ,: 1:.r U ^nt. not loss than thirty (3 0) nays pr i.er to r:
... —.
.ii '. oP �,:i:' a 5 'ion.
•il ' e !: rcr..:lsed by po:tr I:inor Subdivision applicat:icll ca:.1,;.
rl'r_or;i,d or sold until the. roquiro ants lis-LL ^
I�rvo isr.on cc-•, r,i r.to�:
Inc: you application has been gi.von "Fina`.
ny the Planning Director.
Any a7ori.c,,,cO parson may, wi h.in thirty (30) riaya -fter recc,ic-
of this no Lire (Disc ^.tor Approval.), Pursuant to Title 60 7ivi__o ❑.5.
Chapter 1, Section CS.U1.3 of the San Bernardino County Cedc, :.deal
in k rty n'ri ig for consf.deratic..
th ^roof.
Sincerely,
FNVIRONMFNTAL I1IPROVEt-IENT AGENCY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Joiln ^ur- vuzni.k� '
Design nevlew ection
�- West Vnl'iey- Planning Team
J2: n.l•
entL,T"nno�,�i "no,tcd b69?ftfi fit o Tnw "srNn
POW N t H MGM ..
... I I I I � 1 JAW SI MAW It 1 o
CC: Co. Transportation (2)
Co. Flood Control
Foothill Fire District
Associated Engineers
316 East "R" Street
Ontario, Ca, 91764
tvtr Dnn"r 10111 I d•Wpl, I 11F oianrr
Director Action 4 December 29, 1977 •) M.S. 4 W77 -0559C
1 Twenty -seven (27) foot grant of easement to the County of San Bernardino
required for Baseline Avenue to provide sixty (60) foot half -width
3 right -of -way as shown on Minor Subdivision Plat map.
4
5 Seven (7) foot grant of easement to the County of San Bernardino re-
6 quired for Archibald Avenue to provide fifty -two (52) foot half -width
7 right -of -way as shown on Minor Subdivision Plat map.
a
Paving, curbs, gutters and sidewalks shall be installed on Baseline
10 and Archibald Avenues for proposed parcel one (1) only. Plans for
Hall improvements must be approved by the San Bernardino County Road
12 Department prior to installation of said improvements. A cash deposit
13 or bond may be placed with the County Road Department to fulfill
14 this requirement.
15
16 Applicant shall obtain and forward to this office a letter from the
17 serving water agency certifying that capacity for this project has
18 been reserved for a minimum period of one (1) year.
1'1
=0 The following are Flood Control District REQUIREMENTS:
_'1
22 (1) A low block wall shall be provided around the return at Baseline
23 and Archibald Avenues to preclude flows from jumping the curb
24 and entering the site.
;5
:6 (2) Adequate rolls shall be provided at the entrances to the site
,.7 to preclude Baseline and Archibald Avenue flows from entering
'-A the site.
,n
30 The Parcel Map (survey) requirement has been waived (see resolution
11 on Minor Subdivision Plat map).
13 Parcels shall be conveyed using a fractional description, or in
15 a manner as to prevent gaps and overlaps of property lines.
The following are Flood Control District RECOMMENDATIONS:
3s (1) Archibald Avenue shall be designed as a water- carrying street.
w
,10 (2) The westerly portion of the site adjacent to Archibald Avenue
41 shall be adequately elevated above the top of curb or a concrete
42 block wall provided to preclude Archibald Avenue flows from
43 entering the site.
•4
45 (3) Adequate provisions shall be made along Baseline to preclude
47
17 accumulated drainage flows from entering the site. Road 0 improvements on Baseline may provide the necessary protection.
4n
50 (4) Adequate provisions shall be made for the handling of onsite
51 drainage flows and dewatering the site in a manner which will.
51 not adversely affect adjacent property.
57
54 IS) Grading and improvement plans shall be submitted to this
S5 office for review.
56
• A 14441,461
Page 2 of 2
Director Action December 29, 1977 • M.S. $ !177 -0559C
I Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Foothill Fire District.
2
1This action is subject to appeal to the County Planning Commission
4Subcommittee for a period of thirty (30) calendar days from the
Sdate of this notice. The appeal must be made in writing on forms
6available from this office.
7
8If there are any questions regarding the above, please feel free
n to contact this office at 714/383 -3691.
10
12
11
14
15
16
1'
IB
19
20
22
21
24
25
26
27
28
29
10
11
12
11
14
15
76
17
18
19
40
41
42
41
44
45
46
4N
48
49
5n
51
52
57
54
55
56
1 14U 440
•
RECORDING REOUE"ED RY
WNeea II [corm (D ll rV
r
I
:_� s d ."_ L, �'�` • ._ _�
Neww
wd!I�
ins°
J
neaten Pubic in and lm sad Slue
(SPACE ABOVE THIS 1,14E FOR RECORDER'S (ISE)
POWER
OF ATTORNEY
GENERAL
Know All Men by These Presents: That I, _
ANDREW
the undersigned (ointly and severally. if more than one) hereby make. cnnstitllte and appoint. DOUCLAS K. HONE
my !rue and lawful Attorney for me and in my rim,. nla•n and stood And fir my use and henehl: - -- — -_-
(a) To r,A A.manf, sIe Inr, rra :rr, rnurtl And ,tripe nob are Ivory s If mrnry, debt, aronant. I .... Y. bnaaesf, interest dividend,
....try anal d•m..A (whlrh ... is err be ... fir, salt hecnme dm pwrr, of nAyrh!rt b, -,, mR In ar dolmen by me, and to use and lake any
lawful mean !or vie recovery to .... I by legal P•n¢a or olherw.is, and to ete:u!e aid deliver a Aallsfa.hon or release theater, together with the
right end power In (nmp'oil or rnmponnd any claim or demand;
Bit To Ar,iA, eery or all of the following powers as to real maperty, eery interest therein and /m any building iheswrr To mm nct Iw,
purchase, re'e-,e And IAMB ....... an thereof and of iniArncr, nl title then,h,: to lease Inr same for any farm at purpose. Including leases Ice
bu....v, reaneer. and oil And or paw l deeetnpmenl. to sea, ,change, print or tables be same with or without warranty; and to mortgage.
hauler m tr 1 or riber'mm "Dun rr err hormthi Ate the same to sure payment of a nreahahle or non negotiable rate or performance of any
Wife, an m aenrment,
16 In .y, I, any err all of Ib ropmil pawns as to All AIMS of p^ of al amaetly and v,be,. wares and merchandise. [hoses in earn,
and earner pmar•v , pnttcs<inv n r in It,, T. rnntraa !err, buy, ;-!I erh,imb. harrier and re any legal manner deal in and with the same: and
to mnripa:,e la,dr• In •r no nlnrr'w ae eanother a, himulenle II A same to Secure payment nl a eeRrAilli or non negotiable nine or
pedar'nan•e n ary n^h Rao or cep ^.mail
(d) To him. mean.. and la rareaM and d•llvrr amoll bit err Tan n1e1 nobs 16aefor with or without security: and to loan mature and
receive ns,nwb'e or par re ot'We nntn Inernlnr on curb senrrdy As he shall from ornper•
(•) TI -rra•e Intend srmp'r-,erf apt irrminab any 1, 0 a 1 in ,,I, l •M I r IN lash., aI air drum wherein I am or may be frusta,
.' r. ^.•.:,,, ' ,,, and v ,rl r err, cep•.• ,rut .ml ^ rn @r... ro'nnrna. m :lnbunnn or boma, join in any corporate
M1wnnn¢, ,or... r.tinn m per. hn'r d,loI. r n as Alinn or other n o and flit erl•mdan . mmprnmue coevenlon, adjustment, enforcement
or In,.•nlit` pugs err m x.111 nterrs of any c ^rnn•s.n sr; r4 hard. note, debenture err other security; to cents d, compromise.
11, s' , , AM 11! If, All If; ,limp, unnrrl I I: "e ....I by or In It Ind In Itre err accept any property Said 'or money wbather or
art ea': a'!n - r. I, , In,, II, ammnt ov. -, II p,,,...1, set ^nm, ! r sAhs1;,hmn thereof,
In To Iransart bi0nmca of any bid br rho. ,Ind as my all And n ^nd In sign, execute, acenowladge end data., a.w deed. lease, .ridge.
'eras^ r areamr ^1, "1.... 1"i of tout. assirnment of marleage or of the beneficial Interest under
T.ra n' •:, s' r of mlanlr, bvnotb ... t o,. tydtomry, charter paM, bill of lading, bin
c• rile h" Ier^rbC ,"'u ear =tp'l ol,,l of Nbl. Eir of partial release or satisfiefion of mortgage. ryda,
1.11 111 r. 1 it "'lull bt on'! A. err Nil recd ^rrvnce of r. of lonl and such other Instruments in writing of airy kind m class as an" be
Given¢ and Grantlna n ^ter my In Alto,,,, b.^ pi And exlhonty to do and perform all and every as and thing whatsoever neulihe,
°,•,•y or m In Aar m an! nhrn! ?M nrrm,•r: As frl!v to all Winds and purDOVS as f might or could do it personally present.
•'nbv r.•nw ^r All 10 err send 'l to , Ahol ;r 10 all In m r p ^e m he Mee by or ire of these pin now The powers and r acquired by m cam
: rn^^ �. d Arm -ry ,null Ile annlrtaMr In Au coal And Dmsnnal prnMrfy or inleresls (herein now owned Or hereafter acpuued be tar and
wnr•ne' s tan
It, lot Ann•noy is e,,mi henhv to dlhsmi,l In his snit d'il nn the time her purpose far and manner in which any power herein
rn ^'e°'' oo, I I I, , tat ..,A Inr ,mbm', r,AII, And rm ^ooh of Any last ... Trend or d.mrrumt which may be executed by
-, e -: T 1 I' e t 1 Wm^ or demo.'inn ^I rMl err pen,. tl proprtlY. my sad Mtomey shall have exclusive power to fn the leans
,bell,, Im ^ r lintel ! ^I mnl. AnA I! on ar,Nl both or mihopl :r[iplty.
Th. mi r.1 If . mpuM wmmsn Mrtbv further Avellues aad empowers my said Arium,, es my duty aufhmlred agent, to loin In my
beep' , •err err - ,ntnm III M wbrth im, mormIl tell pmprny err emy let ae.I therein, now owned or hareaflem tol lad by my
n'rvn A , I l , 11 as n mi it 1,1114, r rumbe, Ad. or car .... it
war, 11,, '^ n..' '., lures Ire ml,;pbne Rmdrr includes the le minine and /or madal and the singular number Includes the plural.
WITNESS n'; had This 2nd day of_ Nay _ ' �^ 1 78
�-
ANDREW G. DAVIS
State of California. l
it SS
County of llic 1
State, personally appeared let t_, 1Li
before me. the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
( ! 1
known to me to be the person_ _ whose naml subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that,. I
executed the same,
(Seal) _.._
:_� s d ."_ L, �'�` • ._ _�
Witness my hand and official se
neaten Pubic in and lm sad Slue
AtIPREY hl. IIrARN
`s•' i)'!
-
rr,• ' 1 ,I[r. Ile
`
say co;trn r,'.v c °, vrr
-
My Cnmmisswn
Tqures Nnv. 14, 11181 -
1•oWew or wnanNrr- eeNrrlAA ......,.
«,I,..,....
ID.
Lluvrr,..a...n L,.,rl „,i,i m M
1.•11 d r1,1 AI^m• im ihr 6.61 Ind,, elyd Alin, m lic, ,ad fti I bunker
lux
Al lc our ......00 -Wr 10 p-
II III,
Ill.,,, �I•r,,,r 1., 1 "III n,. .
C, • II I••)'rr 11 Yrr A "(III Ihr 1,i. ,u
1 lot see pY1V, .
•
Li
page 1 I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
617,78 Register of Bills
Vendor
Account No.
Description
Amount
Check No.
A.N. Reiter Development
01 -51 -28
Comm. Svcs, Shop Lease $
197.00
1359
Answering Upland
01 -51 -27
Answering Service
20,00
1360
qseline Hardware
01 -51 -38
Comm. Svcs. Hardware
34.79
1361
Bumsteads
01 -19 -51
Project HOY
101.28
1362
Butler Paper
01 -17 -24
Copier Paper
81.15
1363
Citrus Belt - Division U.M.
01 -11 -56
Annual Dues /Wasserman
15.00
1364
D. Williams Printing
01 -17 -24
BS.Cards /Letterhead
100,59
1365
Eastman, Inc.
01 -12 -24
Dater
17.76
01 -11 -24
Office Supplies
6.53
01 -51 -24
19.32
01 -17 -24
55.22
98.83
1364
01wanda School Dist.
01 -51 -28
Art Perez /Comm.Svcs. Summer Pr.
626.40
1365
FSE Check Protector Co.
01 -12 -44
Check Signer
773.80
1366
General Telephone
01 -51 -21
Svc- 5/1 -5/31 (987 -9121)
14.16
01 -51 -21
Svc- 5/1 -5/31 (987 -9183)
7.58
01 -51 -21
Svc- 5/1 -5/31 (987 -7221)
68_72
90.46
1366
Empey, Harry
Expenses
33.76
1367
I.B.M.
01 -11 -44
Typewriter /Elements
820.44
1368
J.R. Freeman
01 -26 -44
Transcriber /Notetaker
528.17
1369
•
Li
page 1 I
page 2
s
0
0"
Register of Bills/6/7/78
Vendor
Account No.
Description
Amount
Check No.
Jobs Available
01 -26 -24
Advertising Job Listings
30.00
1370
Jon D. Mikels
01 -LO -25
Expenses
16.66
1371
John Blaney Assoc.
01 -26 -28
Printing - Issues /Options
166.02
1372
L.A. Hayden Di-sp.
01 -51 -28
Trash Pick -Up. VP
60.00
1373
ague of Cal Cities
01 -19 -56
Dues
7050.00
1374
N&A Belle Electronics
01 -17 -34
Mic Cable
22.79
1375
National Sanitary Supply
01 -51 -34
Janitorial supp. VP
40.60
01 -51 -34
Lights
84.49
01 -17 -34
" "
170.91
296.00
1376
Patton Sales
01 -51 Trust 3 -2
Comm—Svcs. Cabinet PS
95.35
01 -51 -44
Table
40.23
01 -17 -44
Table
40.22
175.80
1377
Rescue Rooter
01 -17 -34
Unclog Sink
28.50
1378
Telegram
01 -19 -55
Ad /Legal
51.00
01 -19 -55
61.20
01 -11 -24
35.64
01 -11 -24
Subscription
9.60
157.44
1379
Southern Cal Edison
01 -51 -21
Svc. 3/17 -5/12
3.73
01 -51 -21
" 3/15 -5111
6.96
01 -51 -21
4/17 -5/17
9.27
01 -17 -21
3/15 -5/11
148.98
168.94
1380
Southern Cal Gas
01 -51 -21
" 4/20 -5/19
12.52
01 -51 -21
4/03 -5/02
13.46
25 98
1381
page 2
s
0
0"
page 3 of 4
Ll
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
617178 Register of Bills
Vendor
Account No.
Description
Amount
Check No.
County of San Bernardino
01 -19 -28
Contractual Account
g 59500.00
1386
International City Man.
Dues
i 283.33
1382
United Sporting Goods
01 -19 -51
Project HO£
1047.48
1383
Western City '-Magazine
01 -26 -24
Job /Advertisement
114.00
1384
Stern Landscaping News
01 -51 -24
Comm.Svcs.
6.00
1385
TOTAL TO HE PAID
$72670.61
Pre -Paid Bills
County of San Bernardino
01 -19 -44
Office Supplies /Equipment
2500.00
1333
U.S. Postmaster
01 -12 -24
Postage for Meter
200.00
1334
Postmaster
01 -12 -24
Postage
26.00
1335
League /CSAC Employee Relations
01 -10 -25
Registration Fee /Jon Mikels
20.00
1336
Service
ary Empey
01-
Harry Empey /Petty Cash
95.10
1337
p c_R.S.
Payroll Contributions
694.01
1338
A.H. Reiter
Deposite for 9320 Baseline
1800.00
1354
Postmaster
P.D. Box Rental
11.00
1355
R2,'(4
Void
1356
VOID
700.8
Postmaster
Postage
47.60
1357
Bill Larson
Comm.Svcs. Instructor Pmt.
160.50
1358
TOTAL PRE -PAYS
$5554.21
page 3 of 4
Ll
N N
m H
C N
a •n
E m
N
J O
V
M
O N
L u
U N
C •n
N m
a a
a
o m
T \
u 1�
N \
U b
N O �
N
W
A
F
6 �n
a T x
� a a
m i 4
O C O
F d a F
6 6 C QQj
F F W t)
x
11
m
n
0
M
d
d
rI
H
U
C
O
U
H
O
W
Y
m
0
N
b
G
w
0\\\
A
T I\ \
5d j`
s \
•
W
0
v
a
m
m
a
CITY OF Rf I ,., 111
PLANK INC.. I':I SS l'oli
Minutes - fte',j_;,,,- I'ienLi nq
'•ay 10, 1'jI;i
C,1LL ;If OiiUE;: The i:iLy of Rancho Cuc,wrin i,l Pl.lnn in,l COmnli ,sinn Ix:!L in a Regular
$„Sq"II on S:ndnosday. 4:,ry 0, ilh:. of. the Rancho Cucamonga
Con.r:uni ty Services uuildiny, 91b1 flaseline Road.
Fleeting was called to order by Chairman Berman Iter;pel at 7:10
PI.C''I.. f. I,' Pledge Of Allegiance MIS led Ir/ Chai r:aan P.empel.
- ALLL;, I,C•CL
PILL_ ,',U- Pre :ant. t•,or:, f(�, -rali ssirnler; ^r.ill, Garcia, Rmnpel and Tolstoy.
Absent was cor:Ii ss ioner J011r!_:.
191; _'i LS nl,rvrd m,<i $„__:: , t1 ^d by Cor,miscinn,•rs 1'ol•tny arrl Ga rci•t inntcs
c
of la,ril Zh, 1978 Fleetiny 6„ approved as posted. l'�ot ^on Carried
',�n,rninnp_ ly. -
aq,•r. L t u_n '::a.; •(r• nc•I in`(.,e r (1:r Io a ,i f.y
' "v I, •nL Ilia, fnr would b,, hell llay ll. Appotnti'•Ont Co 1•., rva rte
as Soon •,s ',:oss�,,l e.
�L' •I. I'L_ -1 +..,',c e ro,a f: nnnrunr.Ml :� (i angl, in d.I tr! for t.hc Grrl�rnl Plan ht. eting.
•'L
_ :r•otu nl
to L. r.cld on IJa at AI La Lo'na !Iigh ScPloul.
LLr IL'; 'I Ti J: •r. f, °n-�i .infer ';Ihl r, :irtifr r 1•t.Ler lu• Sent., nn it, .haII of 1j,
rv;re'ainq tlIar,;,; Lo f I[II.e 'rli clmn, of Lin, Coul:ty
�nlpnrt^'ont, for arrangi 11 fnr FI.I,b „rs Of Co,nmi;sinn and CiLy Staff
to join in al-: norial view of Lhe City from a helicopter.
nu•u_, ,_,I it '_J I':L.:'„ I�I_nit,i,;_ IILIIS
._.. .. . - lm Ci,�l m,I; Ira,•a R -1 n, AP- IIr1 .x t-,, . :713:-73. Sol; tlleasf Corner
uaSOiIle Road and liellraan Avenue. fgq,li Call, : Doug liooe.
C lr limns, Cnuc LV irinnrin;I. rr,.. e'rl,l, °,ded approval n` ;n�,r. chnm;e,
% „•rin1 ,cap; ware IXe;i nt "(1 8,: d.a i l inq lnca ti nn. SL.: ri., m; r,q ortea
requested change would Al i in harn,Ony wiLh Lhe General Plan conditions.
I'is,,ly -,ion foilot:i, "I din'inq vrlirh ,,, nl(!nonr•o of ;,I)Iltayc wlis qII, rtionod.
f llairr,ln RanIml glo"'l npd [ ire Chil,f, Oen^ hillinr;, about irvpact
en lr:,ffir. tnnlrol 1f zmw cl:anq„ is granted. Chin( Millings rr.portrd
rerplos L(c,i ch'Inge would have no adverse effect on Lroffie cuotrol.
Unug Ilul',o reirol-Led on proposed desinll of site.
v;d and "(,lm- d"d by Cf,lmr,i innl.r. ;'i q'nl and fare is aPProvaI of
rn1 Lod changa be rr „,: r•,•n,lr•,I Lo Ci LV cowu,iI for favorabTe
nflirn, lrn�'i,l ilr, 111” •,i L" d- :,�In�.•nl Ilan he SUhl mlhIrl In
I,nulirnl I,. ;l'i"Sion prior I:I i.suaucr of permits. itiOLl(111 6an'icd
rl -u'p Irr•il h -: I, l "14- 77'lorLl «•
:. '.L on n,.r of
„r�rliw Road and Anlel.hy "t d I Ili I Api'l icant: J.l A. Vaollntwarp.
slit .e,l ha': sI1,1,i t.J.,,1 •.ifI pl Ill of pr ,00:gd d,wrl o;,w('l'•t, to Co,mLy
P 1 I e. TnI11 Sinpllcw, I ,r'.I,I Led Inm, (ILlwir from R -3 Le AP i5 a
•,o.nid i�b•o, a; high tien:iIv ""l'rinl ..,.,,nl pr,rini tted Iry R - I •nning would
I'nt.l,n iu I.,n.nl lance t,i L'n Inloen•.( -I I nns of (',rl:I,ral Plan, and
mould lint I.r in horv!on'I with e:i ".I inq rnrana`r'[ial sito;• t'l. Stephens
off „rr.I nodal u:al,,',hotvill” "' ",I i'"I dove lnpnl, °rt,. Fh•. ;V[dmns
re,portod that applicant. ho', offered to ieeeL all required dedications
(10C
and sa Lilac V.:: hrnaev :c(nfr pt2l l is applied for, variance
may be requested. - is•,mw r llarcta .eked Mr. SLC Knin if
properLy times adJ - L, t.n :Ir. lour A11L. aril's proper Ly had been
notified. MI% Steph,a. reported LLey had.
Chaira•,nn Rem.pel Opened jile mreLir.0 for public ro:n:aont. Wnighhnring
properly own II, rs Art AIIon end I,iam•.e that rel ortod tl ay had received
untifiration of propnsrd z;•ro` CollroO only l day in ad •;once of this
'rc ring. I'm I rpu,sl.i•i —t onart.1/ what •ort ,•f 1'I:r,ingysn; wnnld be
:,1ai:od raxt. 1,, their to, Ill. iL . , •,,Iainod Ly conmi'sinner Garcia
that a zone change is rcquirud before a site plan can be approved.
cr. "n:issioner Rmnpel reporLnd i1. was the int,oction of the Planning
Cirw! Ginn to act with fainix,I,n Lo all residents, land owners, and
developers of Rancho cuca;aunga.
__ .I See, ended he Cn :.... Ii�liorrr: Garcia and Dahl that requested
zone �d,,angr, he reconntenwil� A r approval by the City Council.
1s6ussion fnllnwed. Vote voIS Ca11od for°.
,:,s: Uahl, Bard a, Re.r,;cl
Tolctoy
Jai
noik: C;arr_icd by a Vot,, of „ -1.
r4:,', SI;. _ A.:,lid the Lncatinn amt rlcl, Ini Plan to add a gas stollen, with
Plir',,'1t[i!' p�•r :•i oleos to ell fonr!Ilr't mole., 90. ::7r
-73. I_ncat.'i .,n, Southwest
r.in'm•r of Aredbcld and Jaseline. Applicant: Mobile 0117Property
inveski -ent welt.
..: sl.,i-henc showed a dm inq of •.hggd ng center in question, noting
rno-:•I WPSI on gal station 110. Y. Stephens mood that, the
orr'.limrl live plan for rilin 5'nr.. linil •:rl,er shOwnd P. bawl, at this
location and suggested LI L a ys., :4t.b,n located there would not
Fit , in On the origins' over-Al VWWWK of the center. N so,
_ :`rn;•r,c�d enu•,nent sign wore questionable pending Council action
Ordinance.
io'V fnmia.. ies of Proper" ^i Innn•I.l W. 'rant, Dart Rinker, offerer)
r! IF proposal ar�nn nl'. in rpport of qas a,a t.iun Inr•nl.ion.
yin r etIt, i vo of tlnhiIa hit, Iit ert Graham; was pea -sent, and offered
a ri I,,!, 'I of ,rni,o�,:,! :I a-. La'.i „n. C.,Ii; issien q: ^shooed traffic
irn!•l rill., v olnlisrn in id view nLIIer tenants associated with
location of yas station in ccnt.cr.
per: 1 w"ns and Janet Cocivean, I, inn!, from shopping Sector expressed
opposition to approval of gds station.
$te;drenr cugpectod all mUll'r t:'nos of use; I,e Cnn4ililnol 1, and
i,rw 11"I not. }•, approved: fir;,inr} orii;01,11 i'lan, - hewing bank to
oe located there, be retained. Din usnon kila"ed.
ved fort `.••cnnd ^d by flit lni:niuo•o i',i'l and iolntivr Iliac Locnlinu
ru:.l ii r1 „p;,,nnt Plan Amolli -n 1. he denied on the basis of Planning
i'rpa r t.`en 1, fi,rli IIga:
1. foot JD- We prcposert is not adwalr 0, aizv and slope Lo
ar,or.a•dato --nid usr for parting oral loading areas.
2. I ill 1, thin i1t, for tno In nposed ape ens ins drviva I a "con ” as
ill silo I'males Ln ;treats nod hinh:•aays proporly dvsimird a5 to
width and it.gnni tyP” to corn✓ the quantity and kind of
raffir grrera Leal Iq 1,11" noim;rd m,r.
lln• "inn .tao,jar(l has lint hr•..n .
'.' a ' Ion would not. 1•r in h' m•Anly wi th original concept of
lit r ^n ter.
Di srs r.. inn 1n11 o..cd. n!''L i ird Il r•animnua ly.
PL.PIt'l,T,IL':1_l Ui 'ir n ,1 loge; ^.L "•I tt�v ••.L Le PreperL,y Development
,
h1C�I' S1i.S 1. l;ml1. informing thane of Conani s,; inn An: l ion.
RULE Chairman Itnmpel called for a • art recess dL 9:45 pal,
-2-
• 0
Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 12, 1978
A
neighborhood facility fr(,vidod by the County ,ill Whic will include health care
sc•reices, rocrention programs for youth and general sere ices flied it ies in all
facets of community operations. May, 1979 is the anticipated opening date of
the facilitl..
1Cf [ON: (In motion by Garcia, seconded Ile Dahl alt[ carried by the following
wto-7 AYES; Marcia, Dahl, Jones, Rengml; AIKI'AINING: 'folstor, it was voted to
approve the change of Zone from R-; to C -1, rndrx No. 1597 -SS based on the findings
and "'I "' standards as revised and recommended by staff with the following
substitution for planning .staff finding N1:
(1) Due to the existing commercial titles in the area, there is reasonable
probability that the C -) gone district lelll he consistent with the General
Plan •Iroposal being considered; and there is little or no probability
of substantial detriment or interference with the future adopted General
Plan if the C -1 district is ultimately consistent with the General flan.
1'llAKGI: (II IlA'1'. PRU'd A -L TO R -,i, INDEX 'i0. W3S -S2
.9/F PMNIR OP MOTH],], BIAT). G BAKER AVENUE
(Donovan Schowaltrr)
':r. .tit et. enc reported that the appl icont is requesting :1 chm:ge of ❑one from A -1
to R -S on acres to permit the dceclop ;lent of ant apartment complex. The site
fronts nn both Baler AVQTIU6 and Foothill Ii 11'11. and 'it is most likely that access
on PouthiI1 Blvd. will he prohibited since it is designated its n mnnor It ifiliway.
,It. Storms stated that staff is of the npinioo that the site is not conducive
to %l1lrtmentS as the Site till be surrounded by nlnhilr 1101110, parks, Ile asked that
findin be deleted and hosed on staff's findings xnd annlvses, it was recommended
that tl;is hole '0,e l0atinued until the GCIte1'nl Pl:n is adopted, In addition, it
w;is their tt•cn:a'menalai imt that the :1 -1 zoned strip iP proilerty to the south of the
si tc h0 includnl in ill is change of zone. Should the Planning Commission wish to
recommend approval, staff recommends that the _one be changed to R -3 -T (Mill').
Mr. 'ft,lstov Ccprc SSCd concern over Cite circil.1tion problems. Mr. Doughorty stated
that this would be cnt'Crod math the development standards. Stuff indicated that
two acces's opening:; would be recommended on Baker Avenue with no access on Foothill.
The Chairm:m declared the hearing open,
dlr. Donovan Schowniter, applicant, spoke in favor of the Zone change, Iic started
Taal he did not include his home and the strip of property to the south of tits
site in the zone change because he did not want to see his property taxes rise.
here being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed
'tr. Garcia stated his concern over the nee of a high density apartment complex
10x1 to mohilc. homes 91111 did Tint feel this was the proper thing to do. Ile stated
his concern that if the R -3 zone were Granted, it would not restrict other types
of It -,i uses. Mr. Stevens stated that "'I"' Staudor11s could l,c applied to t:he
.:0710 Chang'• which trrnald w'it hhold the enabling ordinance until the site clovolopmont
pl:nvz had he0n approved. Mr. Garcia stated that he was not sure the city could
logally do this.
Al'flON: oil motion l,y 'folstoy, seconded ly .loner :md unanimously carried, it was
voted to continued the roue change request, index no. 11'85-82 to April 2G, 1978.
I`IIIIIJ I' IICr \RI':G:
fib \%Flt 01: RMI A -1 lal It -I, I91111C S'1. ISSS -67
Sflt (7)RNI'R ()1' 17111 S'I'Rllil l , JASPER S'IltEM
(Robert Sowdoin)
Mr. Streets reported that the applicant i!, requesting a change off zone front A -I
t0 R -1 071 2.3 acres in permit 9 minor snhdivi,sion of the west portion of the site.
'fho sure a:ndilll. dcnsitivl; art, four unity per m rc, and it appears likely that the
General Plan will designate the site with a similar density. Based upon findings
�D
Clfv or R 7',;rV40p,
PLANNIM, 11SSIOn
Minutes - RL" .,,:r MeeLirgl
May 10, 1903
t'''LL _;U J,ULI1 Thu City of Rencho Cuct:n,onrl.i Plnnninn ClIminninrt art in a Regular
.. __ Wssior. on Wednesday, I!r:v lo, 117'd, at ilia Rntlr:no Cucalnmlga
Community Services Building, giEl Baseline Road.
Heeling was called to order by Chairman Herman Rowel at 7:10 an.
�LI4" K Pledge of Allegiance was IN by Chairman Rempel.
ALIT' ;i
Prrv—L W"n i,mVissinro's Dahl, Garcia, RoWel and Tolstoy.
Absent was Co:Irt,issior.er Jones.
!loved and "ccnndod by -'ernei ss ionars - olstoy and Sarcia Illnirtes
of April 2n,1978 Fleeting be •,.,lpi,oved a; posted. Mution Carried
I; nr.lin ells ly. - --
0512Ufd.C1/JS 4E! ors
-
I'lW \ lip. ('t 1. n'
'Q i'unify
vuld he Held May 11.
ul! ;._�•..< -- r '',Ppol nt��r:nt to be made
as soon as �,;osslbie. ,
I`L_'_ I•r. '.:asser'rfrl amlou'llco a (hemp. In dale `or be Grnnral illal'. "noting.
�Se,A&q Lo be held on Ny 13, 7:00 tam, aL b.1ta Ups high School.
I07, _ _. !'.r..'l iiq°i . n or .. -iahl n,nstrd if IeLL:•r hl: sent, nn !),)half of the
frill'' nwecsinq Willi; to r'a:,l,lin 7!i tl un, of till` CmInLy Sheriff's
H-';:arm ert. for ai•ranr,ilq fnr P:'n,bors Of IAllan WOn and City Staff
to join in an aerial vie, of be City from a helicopter.
AL)V-RTGIJ
ZSIL_ Wr ICInr „` from R -1 In AP. n'l Gln. 4J'3 -13, Southeast Corner
Baselina Road and Hellman Avenue. Applicant: Doug Hole.
io.': Strphrnrs, County Pianuirn. rer,o: 17,orded anproval of tone cn,vlgo.
Arrial rnp�. '. 0'F? dotailicrl 1of.ati01. !'u•. SLeehens rcportod
requosted c'nango would be in harmony with be General Plan conditions.
Iliscn viioll followed rinr'iun wi.irh n:di r,tnna nro of Par4ways w,as (mlertioned
Cha!r;n l'l Ren:wil rprosLio"rd Fir, W&K, Gann Billings, ammil. 51mc.t.
om Ir0rie cro"'Ol if unre ch�unp' i. m'a 1, it d. Chir'f Killings reported
'Teuost.ed change would 'nave no adverse affect on traffic control,
ih,mg Ilene reported on prounsed de0q, of site.
I:ovr:1 v,d Src.nnrlril by 1'.nar',lki;!"nf r- Il,,,'rl and Garda approval of
r,•I,1:,. Ind ;non Chan t^ hr r'•r.e: ill City foumn,il for favorable
action, ^-:'vi!inn thol aifr• :h.'v:•1 "1 r1 pi:ln ho sulk it.LrJ In
Plamli•vr Lrq HilsiOn Prior Igo is'nranc0 of permits. Motion Carried
1111,:nneuu:ly.
V, in. ;,),1-77 ICrl.l,nc'•t. corner gf
'Ja ,clli nn head ai'd AtIothy"IF, >Lror L. ApplicanL: Jai..es A. VanAu Lwerp.
hmr, snbmil.t.:'i -,ill pLm of pr'lpo"ed drvr:lm.air,nt to County
I'I,ulnimq. Toll SLrPllrm. rr•,nrle:I 9n6„ ch,evir, frgm P -3 Ill All is a
:,rnmd id:,,l, n', gigh rice ^.i1.1 'L•vi'Llpn'nl ... r[In LLod I`y R -1, inning would
nnl. !'o in :wilp] inner, with frnpn"od r.nl,:lil inns of Oel:nral Plan, and
r;nuld ant, Lr in harmony with o'i••til.q fn::,In"rcial files. Mr. Stephens
Offered aerial Inap; .howi:I:I r,'j "!J!lgH velopmrnt. Mr. Stephen",
ropnrl.od that applicant W offered to meet all required dedications
6F
and sethads; howev !,nfnl„ pon 'it is applied for. ,a variance
may be requested. issiolow Marcia ir,kod Mr. Stephen^ if
property owners ad to "r. Van Fnl.w:o re's property had been
notified. Mr. Ste;,:, they had.
Chairman Renlpol npcn 11'nr I.,c'inl fir d!lit: r.n ^,',� nt. Grigh6m ing
pro Per tv ownners Art. ,11 irn ana I'ialln Rii ;� n'rortrd t'...'v Had received
nor ification of pl•cl"'.rd tnn rod nq,• find, 1 d)y in adwu,'.c of this
hen ri ny. Tha. ques L'On''d ol:drt.1, w:h „IL 10rt of ots •.n: would be
;Vicar next to their h, ,j, it V %IC oxpin load ;ry COroissinnpr Garcia
tdlat, a zone change is required before a site plan can be approved.
C(llr:issinrler Remnel rppmjpd dl 'das %he KNOW, of the Planning
Cn'O!"imt to act with ANIO ss to all residents, land owners, and
developers of Rancho Cucamonga.
serondt'd In: t. -l�, l— 'a„ and li filar, requested
-one r.I loge be rorol I.,nd"d for .a:Irn ra y the city Council.
Discussion followed. VnYn oars rall�d 'for•.
UaP,I, Garcia, Relc)e1
'nl
Wont.: Jones
.� tion Can•i ed by a io to of 3 -1.
'. :
Loc anon and tevr f`I,In Ln
PP, r,fy'a _b
ndI' n Uas <tatiml, with
, r.vi cicns to sell foord ;VC °. :ode;. h
�,. >.';a -73. Local. ion, SnuLhwest
curnor of Archibald and Baseline. A;r,rli con t: t- 100ile Oil /Property
I nve unci t west.
showed a rh'ahrinrf of nho'I ping r"Wr in •:"Nion, rAing
�rr:v
srr�hgnc
sins on gas slal.ion :o,,. f''. rro Lad thal tin!
.
ori�li!iil si:.e !)],In frir this 5hol'pinq cpG LC I' sho;:nd s hail: at this
location
and suggested that n qns station located '.Here would not
`it
in NO the origin& over -Al cowN t of U, r,rW,, Also.
I,he nroposed signs were questionable pending Council action
on Sign Ordinance.
ar!Irl; no nto Live of Pra'I'arty Ir.vps Uount W. fart Rioker, nffcrnd
proposel and :n-rpca "nt -; in - ,Innort of rlas station location.
I'ol, rr',enf,n l.i vc of MoHle nil. Rohm Gn aT was froynt and nffgrrd
a lonrdllrinq of propose -d gas skll ill. CO'':lission quc:.tioned traffic
I't'o his. vaq"Jisru and views of miler tenants associated with
IOCat1e11 of gas station in center.
I`nn Lylols and Janet G)chrran, LonaoK frola shopping center expressed
OPPosiLion to approval of gas station.
'frr; C r,�hrlr. lunges [,,,I all ol.hor types of uses he rnor, idarod, and
now! Ilan not. br appro.—d: lithely nrigiull ;elan, skin,ing bank to
�followod.
he lccal:ed there, oe retainod. Oisaasiou
and focinord by frrllinsfn:wrs Ira§! anll Lnraliun
aLli I�rvr•lopnlrnt. flan ;wie-ndu:enl, bq domed on the basis of planning
d'.npart. „Ill. findings:
7. That. th.' silo prownsord is nn' v 'i'll .v 1 1 s;;.e anti shape to
ICCnlllorfatf, said IISn for "IO illg Jhd lodding arvi:;.
2. That thr silo for Lhr prn:rosod u',, Ilan ilodrrluate nr'eess as
I,ho sitr rolab:s In strnots and mghr:avS prnperly drsignod as to
width and ilnprn"i' "It Lye'. Ln tarry the quantity and kind of
f.'affic (lnnoraLcll by I.hr p,oprs d u'a:. .
3 thr, sign sLondal':I !has nil hrrn :i-,!,
r. .':1. ;taiinn would not. I)Q in harmony with original concept of
,:hnlyiny ry -ntrr.
LlilL''.10-
;Till m."ion loli(wwd. FloLion f.arrird Ihlanil:�ulls ly.
- -'—
PI, I11'rTY i)ELUOP_
r!I,lir,:,n, rl:mpvl rnriursl. ^d n lid I'.r Ir snnC to Pro,tterty Development
MLpf WLS,
;cnt. informing then) of Commission Action.
RECESS
Chairman Rempel called for a short receen at 9:45 p.nl.
Planning Commissi oil "tes (cont'd) April 12, 1978
and anal,vsos its well as the city attorney's findings, staff recommends the approval
of this zone change.
The Chairman declared the hearing upon. 'Their being no one to speak in favor or
Opposition to the matter, the Chairman declared the hearing closed.
AI:'iiON: on motion by '1'0151'0y, -sccondcJ by (;:trcia and un;,n i nmuslc carried, It wits
rot cJ to upp rncc the change of ..one fra:n A -1 to II -I, Indcs No. 1,,'85 -07 based upon
staff's and the cit) attorney's findings and :in,;lyses.
PUBI.I(: 111SAlt ING
MANGE OF FROM R -1 -1 10 R- 1- 20,01111, INDIIX `;0. W92 -57
W/S OF 11l:1A.M\N, APPROXIMATELY 2000 FP.IfI' N/0 RA9)ON S'I'RGC'I'
(R. L. Acinage)
mr. Stevens reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from R -1 -1
to R -1- 20,000 to permit a minor subdivision dceclnpment of 4 lots approximately
I_ acre in size nn the 2.1 acre site. the '2 ncrc lot elza has been established
in the wren, and based upon their findings, staff amends their recommendation
that the change of zone to 11- 1- 20,000 be approved for the subject site only.
1110 Chai rmdn declared the hearing open. 'There being no one to speak in favor
or opposition, the Chairman declared the hearing closed.
ACTION: Upon motion by Dnhl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was
vet ed -1 to approeo the change of zone from R -1 -1 to R -1- 20,000, index no. W92 -57
hosed upon staff's findings and amended recommendation.
,`all' ; -lil. li:I S6 I_fIl ?IS
I`ROI'OSAI POR \ilipllSl'I'IUS OF PROPERTY FOR SCHOOL 5I'1'1'S
(Alta Loma !Miool District)
SuperintOnJcnt PInyJ Stork of the Alta I.om:, School District presented the study
prepared In nSsist the school district in the location of school sites to the
Pl ann ire, Cnnlmi sz ion. Ile detailed the procedure which the school district must
unJcrt akc in the acqusition of school sites and pointed nut tho futuro proposed
achnol sites in the district. In their letter of April 4, 1979 to the Planning
Cam.ni scion, 2 p.u'ccls were requested for consideral ion. Mr, Storl, indicated
that Parcel 1 will in all likelihood he abandoned nod that the school district
is rcqucst inµ consideration of parcel 2 at till:: time.
Ptr. 1;arcia stated that it would he desirable to hire a Master Plan Of all schools
in Rancho ('uc;namtga, nnJ th;tt it would 11e dcsirablc for the Alta Loma School
District. to provide input to the consultant preparing the city's General plan.
IO \_: llpen notion by .IOTIVS, seconded by '1'ol Stor and un;minanlSly carried, it was
voted to approcc the acquisition of Parcel 2 by the Alta Loma School District.
the (:hit irinnn called a short recess at 9:45 p.In. At 10:00 p.m., the meeting was
reconvened.
%1llil1N(; R'1'1'11 OMNI)' 1'1,000 llOMROI, DIS9'RICI'
Mr. Itassermmt stated that n meeting has been Sebcduled with the County Flood
('.ontrol District to brief the Cimmi.asion on present and proposed district plans
for linncho (:ucmm0nl ;a. 1110 meeting will bo held on April 25, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
Mr, ICn SSC rIn :u1 reported that as reque:;ird by th, [imnni selun, staff h:1S prepared a
rc•m Lition for the City Council ch ;utµinl! the mectirn! limo, of the Planning Commission
11om 7:33 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 'iLis resolution will he heard at the next City Council
meeting.
- 3 -
(,F
I'lann i ng Cealln i 9 i on Noes (cont td) • Ali ri1 12, 1979
,md nnalyeo♦ nn w.•11 as the city attorney's IF indinns, staff recommends the approval
of this zone, change.
The Chairman declared the hearing open. 'Their being no onl• to speak in favor or
opposition to the matter, the Chairman declared the h,ariug closed.
A111 ION: On notion by foir,toy, seconded by Gamin and Im.:nirarnsh r.n't'iod, it wos
rntc�l to upplove the cb:lnp,, of 7.1111, fiunl A -1 to It 1, Tilde, No. W85-67 based upon
staff's mill the Cit'} attorney's findings and ;m.ilY <cs.
!'MILIC Ili :: \IfTN(I: ✓'
i'I I AIr I;I'. I1P ZONI'. FI20'1 li - I - I 10 R -I- 20,000, 1NIII'.X `:P, h0'-
Ir /S 01' Ill:I I.I \N, AI'P IiOX I MA' 11: LY 2000 FITT N/0 IDANYi1N S'i'If l: 1('I'
(R. L. Acinago)
1r. Stevens reporicd that the applicant is recteI (m e changl' of xnne from R -1 -1
to 11- 1- 20,()00 to pormit if minor subdivision c1o%TI0jInlvnt of I lots approximotoly
ac f, in size nn the 2.1 acre site. 'file " acre lot glee b.ls born established
in the ama, and has011 neon their findings, staff nmonds timlr reconnu,nd ;tion
that the change of zone to R- 1- 20,000 be approved for the subject Site only.
'I he Chni room doe heed the hnn'i ng open. More lying nn one to speak in favor
or opposition, the Chairman declared the hearing closed.
ACTION: Upon motion by 0nhl, secmtded by Tolstoy and unanll:ously carried, it was
r of cd to apprnvc tits ch:mp.o of zone froln It -I -1 to P -1- 211,0011, index no. W92 -57
hosed upon staff's findings and amended recommendation.
':I'':.III %IN,; 1_'11: !IN
:
I'I >ohOSAI FOR',ACIJI115 I I It'; 01: PR0PFR'1'Y FOR SCH001, Sl'ITiS
(Alta Loma School District)
Dupe r in T emel ea t I'loyd titnrk of the Alta koma School 11;,t, ct presented the study
propomd to assist the school district In the loc;1thn of schnnl sites to till'
PU tin iTip, Comm l s s i nn. Ile dotailed th, provednre „hi :h Ill- s,hooI district roost
nnd,rtak, in the nignsitkill of School sites and pointed nut the flItlll'e proposed
•:rheol sites in tbv district. In their letter of April 4. 19 -8 ill tho Planning
('.om"lissian. 2 pu reel'. w, tIe rcgncstcd for co11sidvrrt inn. !Jr. Emil. ;odirnt,d
that Parcel I will hi M likelihood he abandoned cold Clot the school district
iv requesting cnnsider;Itiun of Parcel 2 at this time.
pdr. Garcia stalled Ihal it would be desirable to h.o c a '1, ter Ilan of all schools
in Raticho ('ur:nnon' ;n, nod that it would he des Irahic fur Ih(• AIto Lenin School
Oistriet to provide input to the consultant preparing the city's Gencral flan.
V IIIN: Iipon mot inn be ,1110,5, seconded by 10IStoc ;old un:minain';Ic ca? ried, It was
toted - -to approve the acquisition of Parcel 2 by the Alta Loma School District.
Ili,, Chnirnan called n short recess at 9:45 p.m. At I0:011 p,m_ the mooting was
rCCOtivenell.
NIAc'I'ING IVITII COONTT 10)0110 CONTROL DISTRICT
?Ir. Wissermnn stated thus a meeting has boon seta Ju led with the Comity Flood
Control District to In'ief the Commission on prosent and piopo - ;ed district plans
for Itmreho Cnrnnnmgn. 'ihe mooting will h, hold nn April !71, 1979 at 7:00 p.m.
PI N01,111 'I ON 1:1ih'ic I'CIi llllill 11:0 'I li 111
'Ire hISCvlIf o I "nit "'I 11,,I n. fa,luv:trd In I Ill- !', mi;. i m. :;I II'I' Im; prcpnrcd a
I ill lit inn I' „r !hi• I'.i!r ( „i,... I rhino i nl; the ti ". inn tim.' ol. thl� Plmnninil Colnnlission
I'm °, 7::,0 p. m. to 1:00 p.m. This resolution will he iroard at the next City Council
meeting.
.i -
May 31, 1978
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL- PLANNING COPMISSION
MINUTES
Special Joint Meeting
A special joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission was held at
the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wed-
nesday, May 31, 1978.
Present: Councilmen Phillip Schlosser, Jon Mikels, Charles [Jest, and Mayor
James C. Frost.
Planning Commissioners Peter Tolstoy, Jorge Garcia, Richard Dahl, and Chairman
Herman Rempel.
Absent: Laura Jones and Michael Palombo. Palumbo had been excused by Mayor
Frost to represent the City at another meeting. Mr. Palumbo did arrive at the
meeting at 9:00 p.m.
The City Council and Planning Commission met in joint session to discuss the
various alternatives proposed in the city's General Plan, The city's consultant,
Mr. John Biayney, reviewed the various alternatives. Following extensive dis-
cussion, the meeting was adjourned at 12:30 a.m. on June 1, 1978.
Adjournment:
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by West to adjourn the meeting to June
7, 1973. Motion unanimously carried.
Nation: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia to adjourn to June 14, 1978.
Motion unanimously carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Lauren M. Wasserman
•
May 17, 1978
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was held at the Community
Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on
Wednesday, May 17, 1978.
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor James C.
Frost,
ROLL CALL Present: Council members Jon D. Mikels, Michael Palumbo, Phillip
D. Schlosser, and Mayor pro -tem Charles West.
City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; and Interim City Attorney,
Sam Crowe.
APPROVAL OF The minutes of May 3, 1978, April 25, 1978, and April 19, 1978.
MINUTES were approved.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to approve the
May 3, April 25, and April 19 minutes. Motion unanimously
carried.
ANNOUNCEMENTS The following announcements were made by Mayor Frost:
1. President of SCAG appointed Mikels as member of the Community
Development Committee.
2. Schlosser was appointed to the Transporation and Facilities
Commi t tee.
3. Frost was appointed member of the Executive Comm ittee of
the Citrus Belt of the League of California Cities.
4. School Task Force meeting, Thursday, May 18 at 4:30 p.m.
5. West Valley Transit Service Authority meeting on Thursday,
May 18, in Montclair City Hall.
6. Regional Sewerage meeting, May 18, 7:00 p.m. Montclair
City Hall.
7, Friday, May 19, Governor Brown will be in Rancho Cucamonga
at the Community Service Building, 3:30 p.m. Purpose of visit
is to find out needs of Rancho Cucamonga. Will be accompanied
with Supervisor Goggi n.
8. Schlosser reported he had attended a SANBAG meeting that day.
Discussion on projects of SCAG for the region of San Bernardino
County highway priorities, air quality management district, and
budget approval for Omnitrans.
9. Palumbo had attended the first meeting of the Arrowhead Law
and Justice Committee.
PUBLIC HEARING An Ordinance to participate in the National Flood Insurance
Program.
Ordinance No. 24
ORDINANCE NO. 24
(second reading)
AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS IN ACCORD-
ANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.
Title of Ordinance No. 24 was read by M -. Wasserman.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to waive the entire
reading. Motion unanimously carried.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance
No,
Open for discussion. None.
Motion unanimously carried.
PUBLIC HEARING An Ordinance for discharge of safe and sane fireworks.
Ordinance No. 25 ORDINANCE NO. 25
(First reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, PERMITTING THE DISCHARGE OF SAFE
AND SANE FIREWORKS.
Since 1973 the sale of fireworks has been legal, but the dis-
charge is prohibited. This ordinance would permit the discharge
of the safe and sane fireworks. The sale of such fireworks
would be limited to civic and charitable groups with a maximum
of one stand per 10,000 population.
Title of ordinance was read by Mr. Wasserman.
The City Attorney had passed out a revised ordinance with a
Section 4 added. This was read in full by the City Attorney
as follows:
Section 6. The sale of safe and sane fireworks
shall be permitted in commercial districts of the
City, subject to all applicable State laws and re-
gulations as may be adopted by the Foothill Fire
District.
Palombo felt that for the benefit of the social organizations
it should be adopted as an urgency ordinance. Otherwise, it
would not be in effect for the July 4 holiday.
It was agreed that this be an urgency ordinance.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by West to waive the entire
reading. Motion unanimously carried.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance
No. 25 as an urgency ordinance with the addition of Section lS
Frost expressed concern about the safety of fireworks. Chief
Billings of the Foothill Fire District who was present was asked
to clarify this point.
Chief Billings remarked that few fires or accidents were created
by those who purchased the safe and sane type fireworks. The
Fire District had reviewed past records to verify this. Problems
arose from those who purchased fireworks from neighboring towns
and brought them back into the area to discharge them. He said
in order to enforce "no fireworks" in the community would cause
a great deal of hardship upon the taxpayer.
Frost felt that we should take a good look at this during the
holiday season to see if there are problems and perhaps retract
the ordinance in the future if there were such problems.
Motion unanimously carried
6 0
City Council Minutes -3- May 17, 1978
LEASE OF Mr. Wasserman explained to the Council that a site had been located
SHERIFF'S for the sheriff's substation at 9th Street and Hellman. The
SUBSTATION figures in the agenda were wrong -- correction would be a total cost
of approximately $1800 per month at $.20 per square foot.
Mikels asked why this location was considered over the others
mentioned?
Wasserman said for several reasons:
I. Adequate parking
2. Gas pump would hopefully be installed;
a place had been planned for one.
3. For the amou nt of space -the next best
location was just adequate for now and
would not give room for future growth.
However, according to Mr. Wasserman, the primary reason was the
size. Some storage space could be used by the City.
Schlosser asked if this had been located by a competitive bid
process? Wasserman said yes that it was the going rate in the
City now. The building would be leased through the A. H. Reiter
Company.
West asked how many would be in the space at one time? Captain
Wickum was present so the questions were addressed to him. Captain
Wickum said that at any one time there would be from twelve to
fifteen people in the building -- secretaries, watch commander,
captain, detectives, and four CETA people. At the change of a
shift, there could be up to approximately twenty people in the
building.
He said there were four buildings they had found in Rancho Cucamonga.
The next best building was 38 cents per square foot. The others
were one at 96 cents per square foot, one that was too small with
only 2,000 square feet, and one at Archibald which was 4,000 square
feet but had inadequate parking facilities for the public.
Further discussion followed with concern expressed by the Council
regarding the location, the price, the available parking space,
the size of the proposed building. The Council felt the additional
1500 to 2000 square feet of space was not necessary at the time.
It was explained that this room would be used as an evidence locker
for the Sheriff's Department where such things as bikes, cars, etc.
would be stored that had been stolen. Also, this space could be
used for four additional offices in the future by the sheriff or
City for some other department such as Community Services. It could
also be used in the future for some other department not yet formed
such as a Street Department.
Palombo felt that the 6,000 square feet was not unreasonable and the
price of 30 cents per square foot was reasonable, therefore, he
made the following motion:
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the lease of
the building through A. H. Reiter Company at 9th and Hellman for
30 cents per square foot.
Concern was still expressed by some of the Councilmen regarding the
size and location of the building. They felt uncomfortable in
giving their approval.
City Council Minutes -4- May 17, 1978
Mr. Henry Reiter was asked to answer questions regarding the cost
of the building. He said he figures the cost at 16 cents per square
foot, then took into consideration there would be $50,000 of improve-
ments made in order to make this into a police station. This was
divided by the five years (or three years whichever the city desired).
It was pointed out that other buildings would go for much higher --
upwards to about 50 cents per square foot in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Frost felt the gas storage was an important point to have included
in the contract. It was pointed out that the gas storage area would
be installed, but not sure the County would make use of it. That
was something yet to be worked out.
Schlosser felt uncomfortable with the contract, but admitted there
did not seem to be any other choice. West concurred. Frost felt
the price was right. Mikels said the city would not be ready to
build its own station in less then five years. This would give the
city a chance to accumulate funds to build their own police head-
quarters.
Mr. Reiter was asked if the city could have a five -year lease with
an option then perhaps the rate could be reduced after the five
years. Mr. Reiter said this could be worked out and had been dis-
cussed that day.
Motion unanimously carried
TREE
Mr. Wasserman recommended
that the city continue
using the County
PRESERVATION
Ordinance which had been adopted
by reference on
tree preservation.
ORDINANCE
Ile said the city did need
a tree ordinance, but
it was not some-
thing one could rush into.
The staff would come
back to the Council
once one was drafted.
First question that arose was the definition of "native tree."
Mr. Holley, staff representative working on the ordinance, was asked
to answer questions regarding the ordinance. Mr. Holley said he
had directed the question to the City Attorney and the definition
given to a "native" tree was one that grew naturally in the area.
Such trees which were cultivated such as citrus and nut bearing trees
were not included.
Mikels wanted to see some revisions made to the existing ordinance.
He was basically concerned with sections 66.025, Permit Application,
and 66.026, Issuance. He felt that the ordinance should be reworded
as follows:
"Application for a permit to remove a living,
native tree shall he made in writing to the Community
Development Director for placing on the agenda of
the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission
meeting. The Planning Commission shall review and
approve or approve with modification or deny such
a permit."
He suggested "the permit" be part of the review process itself,
in language substituted to the effect that a permit shall be part of
a tentative approval for a subdivision.
City Council Minutes
-5- May 17, 1978
Discussion followed from the Council over the issue of whether the
ordinance adopted from the County was adequate. Some felt it was
but needed to be enforced. Others felt it needed to be modified
with language inserted to protect the trees now.
Mr. Wasserman said the staff understood the concerns of the Council,
however, there were things that could be done at the staff level
such as:
1. Could convey to the developers that have
not started developing these concerns and
ask them to voluntarily cooperate with the
city.
2. Could start enforcing the present ordinance.
Those from the audience addressing the issue
Charles Kalback, a citrus grower. His concern was with the citrus
trees. Although the ordinance did not define citrus as a "native"
tree, he felt that many of these trees could be saved and wanted
the Council aware of this concern.
Larry Bliss had come from a town with very strict tree ordinance.
He expanded upon some of the problems.
Ray Trijillio felt there should be a plan regarding the removal
of dead trees.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to refer the
tree preservation ordinance hack to the staff for further study
and to come back to the City Council with something at the next
meeting, if possible, with revisions on the existing ordinance.
Motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Schlosser, West, Palumbo, Frost
Noes: Mikels
Absent: None
Mr. Wasserman said we would get a, letter out to the builders through
the BIA asking them to cooperate with the city regarding this issue.
Council agreed this was a good idea.
BASELINE This was explained that the agreement was just a formality since
COMMON there were no funds involved. The agreement is for property the
USE District uses for their underground Cucamonga storm drain in which
AGREEMENT the proposed Baseline project located between Hellman Avenue and
Archibald will need for construction.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve the Common -
Use Agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood District. Motion
unanimously carried.
APPEAL_ An appeal had been filed with the city by McCutchen and Associates
FROM from a Planning Connnission decision denying a zone change. Mr.
PLANNING Crowe told the Council they had no choice but to hear the appeal.
COMMISSION
Mr. Stephens from County Planning recommended the hearing be held
on August 2 since there were some lengthy issues coming up in
July with the hearings on the General Plan.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to set the hearing date
for the appeal from McCutchan and Associates on August 2. Motion
unanimously carried.
• •
City Council Minutes -6- May 17, 1978
RESOLUTION A Resolution regarding the Sheep Mountain Wilderness area.
SHEEP MOUNTAIN The resolution had been submitted by the City of Glendora for
WILDERNESS the City Council to endorse and support the creation and
AREA designation of the Sheep Mountain Wilderness area in the Angeles
and San Bernardino National Forests.
Discussion regarding the necessity of the resolution since the
area included was not within the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga.
Mayor Frost turned the meeting over to Mr. Martin Bolding, who
had made the mayor aware of the need, to answer questions.
Mr. Bolding described the area and the reason for adopting a
resolution supporting the creation of an area to preserve the
remaining East Fork Herd of bighorn sheep and the wild life in
general.
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING AND SUP -
PORTiNG THE CREATION AND DESIGNATION OF THE SHEEP
MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS AREA ON THE ANGELES AND SAN
BERNARDINO NATIONAL FORESTS.
Title was read by Mr. Wasserman as it would be after typing.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to waive the
entire reading. Motion unanimously carried.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Schlosser to adopt
Resolution No. 78 -23. Motion unanimously carried.
ADDITIONAL Mr. Wasserman introduced three additional items to submit to
ITEMS the City Council which had come in too late to be on the
agenda.
1. Appeal of a Planning Commission decision concerning a zone
variance by Mr. and Mrs. Walter White.
nm: a:mnnded that the hearing be set for June 21 since
this request would not be affected by the General Plan.
Motion: Moved by Scholosser, seconded by Palombo to set the
White hearing for June 21. Motion unanimously carried.
2. Appeal of Planning Commission decision of a site plan approval
of a Mobil Gas Station at Baseline and Archibald in the present
Baseline Village. Recommended that the hearing be set for June
7 since th;s was already zoned for commercial and would not be
affected by -he General Plan. Applicant - Property Investments
West. Inc.
Motion: Moved by W :.st, seconded by Schlosser to set the
appeal by Property Investments West, Inc. on June 7. Motion
unanimously carried.
3. To set a public hearing for abandonment on Alpine Street
and Archibald Avenue for June 7.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to set a public
hearing for the abandonment of Alpine Street and Archibald
Avenue for June 7. Motion unanimously carried.
City Council Minutes -7- May 17, 1978
CONSENT Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve the
CALENDAR Consent Calendar. Motion unanimously carried.
a. Tract 8958: Release Performance Bond (Sewer) in the amount
of $18,000 and Performance Bond (Water) in the amount of
$25,000 to Coral Investment, Inc.
b. Tract 9224: Accept roads located at the northeast corner
of Ramona Avenue and Victoria Street.
c. M.S. No. 76 -0648: Accept an Instrument of Credit and Agree-
ment in the amount of $5,400 for road improvements on Amethyst
Avenue.
d. Approval of bills
APPOINTMENT
Mr. Empey, Finance Director, reported on the choice of an Auditor
OF AUDITOR
for the City. He recommended Lance, Sol, Lunghart. The
company had been in business since 1929 and specialized in
governmental auditing.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to accept
Mr. Empey's recommendation to engage Lance, Sol, Lunghard as
auditors for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Motion unanimously
carried.
EXTENDING
Discussion over the issue of extending the Planning Commission
MEMBERSHIP
membership to include a representative from Etiwanda. People
OF PLANNING
from Etiwanda who spoke in favor of the expanding the member -
COMMISSION
ship were:
Gene Craig, President of the ELiwand Service Club --
said the Club had a meeting on May 10 and had
selected three possible candidates to be placed on
the Planning Commission. They were: Joe White, Ray
Trujillo, and Don Baet.
Mr. Antlocer, from the Alta Loma Chamber of Commerce
also supported the plan of extending the Commission
to include a resident of Etiwanda.
Several councilmen expressed that the appointment to the Planning
Commission should be by merit and not by location.
It was felt that the addition of a representative from Etiwanda
TWO -TIER
could be tied in with the next issue, the two -tier government.
GOVERNMENT
Mayor Frost felt that by the June 21 meeting there would be
a recommendation from the Tri- Community Committee. There was
no further action from the Council.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor Frost had a meeting on Tuesday, May 16, with Supervisors
Kamansky and Townsend and mayors from several other cities
from surrounding communities. Purpose of meeting was to dis-
cuss common concerns in the West End. There was discussion
that perhaps this would materialize into a committee that would
meet regularly for this purpose,
ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to adjourn to an
executive session for the purpose of discussing a personnel
matter. Motion unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9715 p.m.
lilamning Gen1111155len Minutes (cont'd) ,April 12, 1979
3t- ighborhood facility provided by the f.ounty Which will Include health taro
serci ces, rec rent i on progrmne for youth and general sr ry ices foci l it ics in all
fleets of community operations. May, 1979 is the anticipated opening date of
tilt- facility.
AC'I'IOA: On motion by Il: rcia, secandod by IWI11 oW carricd by the following
yeti ,1 ES: Gnrcia, 113111. .lanes, liempel; AfiS'I'AIKIRG: 'rolstoy, it was voted to
approve the change of cone frorl It -.i to C -1, In6ex So, Iti'J' -3S based on the findings
and 'I" standrurds as revised and recommended by staff With the following
substitution fill, planning staff finding M1:
(1) Puc to the existing commercial uses in the urea, there is reasonable
probability that the C -1 tone district kill be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered; and there is little or no probability
of substantial detriment or intcrfcrence with iilo fnturc adopted General
Plan If the G -1 district is ultimately consistent With the General Plan.
I'IBIM: IIEARISG:
CILW(11'. III' �0`(li. I'ROM A -1 in R -n, ImIlix 'Co. 1,99 -92
S/F (OIIXh;R of F(Y)'I'IIILI, I31M). Ni RARER AVf,XIII'.
(I)onotan Schowniter)
?lr. Stevens reported that the ;giplic:mt is requesting a chn::go of zono from A -1
to I: -.i on =acres to per :nit tiu devclopnent of an :gnrrtmmnt complex. The site
fvonts an hoth linker Avenue 'and foothill Blvd. and it is most likely that access
on Foothill RICO. will be prnhibited since it is designated as n major highway.
f1r. Stevens stated that staff is of the opinion that tilt, site is not conducive
to :Ip:lrtment: ns the site will be surrounded by mohilc home parks. Ile asked that
finding I'S he dcic?od and hased on staff's findings and analyses, it was recommended
t IIlit this item he colt mull tint II the GCTIMII PI nn is adopted. in addition, it
w ;ls their reco:macndnt ion flint the A -1 zoned snip of prolicrty to the south of the
site he included in thin. change of Zone. Should the Iil:mning CAlum1 ss i on wish to
recommend approval, staff recommends that the zone be changed to IL -3 -T (MIIF).
llr. "fel stov expressed conce!'n over the circulation pnoi,lel Mr. Prolgherty stated
that this would be covored with the development standards. Staff Indicated that
two access openings would be recommended on Maker Avenue with no access on Foothill.
he Chairman declared the hearing open.
ill. Pelleyan ,n Ch0laalter, npplicunt, spoke in favor of the zone change. Ile stated
luif It,,, did not Include his (tome and the strip of property to the south of the
silo in the none change because he, did not want to sec his property taxes rise.
'There I)Cing no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed.
'Ir. Garcin ntate,l hie concern over the use of n high density apartment complex
next to mohilc homes and did not feel this was the proper thing to do. Ito stated
his concern that. if the R -S cone were granted, it would not restrict other types
of ll-,i nscs. Mr. Stevens started that "'I "' standard could he applied to the
zone change which would withhold the ennhl in}; ord in :nce until tilt' site development
plans hall boon approved. Nil'. Garcia stated that lie was not sure the city could
legally do this.
W iTOS: On motion by 'I'olstoy, scoondc(I be dea CS on;I unanimously carried, it was .
vote) Fto continued the zone chnngc request, index no. W85-82 to April 26, 1978.
y" In 11[1.1 l', III',A ItI'al;
('IIAMGI'. 01, -1;l)SI'. PROM ,A -I In It 1, Noll% X17. W9f, -117
S /'n' CORNI'R (T 19111 SIRlllll f, .IASI'I'dt SIREI I
(Itobort Roddoin)
Nil*. Slovens reported that the npplicnilt is requesting a chnngc of aono from A -1
to It -1 on 2..i acres to permit a minor subdivision on the west portion of the site.
The surrounding densities arc four units per derv, and it nppenrs likely that the
General Han will designate the site with e similar density. Based upon findings
Planning Commissionfortes (cont'd) 40 April 12, 1978
and analyses as well as the city attorucy's findings, staff recommends the approval
of this zone change.
The Chairman declared the hearing open. 'Their Icing tit) one to speak in favor or
opposition to the matter, the Chairman deelarrd the hearing closed.
Al "PION: ()It mat ion by 'lo l St oy, <econdod by 6:1 rc ill and uan n1 pious l) ca rr i old , it was
voted to opprov0 the change of 1 "ne frtaa A -1 Iv 1; I, Index Vn. W85 -o7 based upon
staff's and the city ottorney's findings and andlvscn.
PIIItLIC III!.AItIYG:
;,It,R'd FROM R - I - l '1'O R- 1 -2(7, Dp11, I:(DI�.% ';il, 1%92 -S7
W/S Ill' Ill lldMVI. APPROXMVI'GLY 2000 F1ih'I' S/0 IIAWON SRF11:f
(R, I.. Acinage)
plr. Stevens reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from R -1 -1
to R- 1- :O,OOn to permit a minor subdivision d(•veltlpmcnt of 4 lots approximately
I. acre in site on the Ll acre site. 'I'IIc '- mare lot si::c has be ea estnhlfishod
in the area, and hascd upon their findings, staff atlendi their recommendation
that the change of zone to R- 1- 20,,000 he approved for the subject site only.
The Chnirane Jaclared the Till open. 'fhcre being no one to speak in favor
or opposition, the Chairman declared the hearini; closed.
A(.IION: Ilpon motinn by Dahl, seconded by '1'olstoy and umnnimously carried, it was
toted to approro till, change of zone iron R -1 -1 to R- 1- 20,11110, index no. W92 -57
based upon staff's findings and amended recommendation.
I'R11PO5Al F01t ACQUISI'i MN OF PROPERTY FOR gt11001, 511115
(Alta Loma School District)
Superintendent Floyd .Stork of the Alta Lunn School District presented the study
prepared to assist the school di::trict in till' location of sdmol sites to the
i'l:nninr Commission. Ile dolnlled the prpc•edure tdtich the school district must
undertake in the ;tcqusition of school sites and pointed nut the future proposed
School sites in the district. In their letter of April 4, 1979 to the Planning
Commission, 2 parcels were requested for cons iderat inn. Mr. Stork indicated
that Parcel 1 will in all likelihood he abandoned and that the school district
is requesting consideration of Parcel 2 at this time.
%il,. Garcia Stntod that it would be dcsirablo to haven Master Plan of all schools
in Rancho Cucarnongn, and that it world ho dcsirablo for the Alta Loma School
Itistrict to provide input to the consultant preparing tile. city's General Plan.
WHO\': Upon motion by doncs, seconded hr 'Iolstoy and unnnimtously carried, it was
voted to approve the acquisition of Parcel 2 by the Alta Loma School District.
'Iho Chairman called a short recess at 9:45 p.m. At 111:00 p.m., the meeting was
reconvened.
hlRhl IN(; WI 111 COUNIY FLOOD CONTROL DI S'I'R W,I
Mr, Wnsscrmmn slated that it meeting has hecn schodiled with the County Flood
('.ontrol District to brief the (lommi scion on present and proposed district plans
for Rancho Cucnmoaga. Tito mooting will be hold nn April 25, 1978 at 7:00 p.m, '
ItlSt11d MON C161+A {1:7(1 7.11.1'; f I \G 'I'IDIII
Ch•, W;Ossermun report eJ lhit as roqucov,l by the 1nnunt SSion, staff has prepared a
resolution for llm I.ity Council changing, till' me'tin(j time of the I'I;naing Commission
I rom 7:30 p.m. to 7:1111 p.m. This resolution will be heard at the next City Council
meeting.
3 -