HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978/05/17 - Agenda PacketAGENDA
RANCHO CUCAfIONGA CITY COUNC'1,
Regular fleeting
Wednesday, May 17, 1978
1. Call to Order by Mayor Frost.
2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
3. Roll Call: Mikels�, Palombo Schlosser - , West (Mayor pro -tem)
Frost.
4. Approval of Minutes.
S. Announcements.
,fa! A. PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to participate in the National Flood Insurance
Program. (Second ReaJing).
ORDINANCE NO. 24
AN ORDINANCE 017 1111.. CITY 01: R.ANC.IIJ CUCAMOWA,
CALIFORNIA, F.S'rABLISHING RF.GULATTONS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE DGPARTITENT 01: UOUSiNG AND URBAN DEVELOP-
MENT FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to participate in the National
Flood Insurance Program, it is required that sn ordinance be adopted
by the City Council which will ensure that adequate measures are imple-
mented to provide protection for any future construction within flood
hazard areas. rho ordinance which has been drafted by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development, may not be altered.
REC EENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed
ordinance establishing building regulations for construction within flood
hazard areas.
i_AK.' PUBLIC HEARING: A safe and sane fireworks ordinance. (First Readin -&).
ORDINANCE NO. 25
AN ORDINANCE 01; Till; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, PERMITTING THE DISCHARGE OF SAFE
AND SANI: FIREWORKS.
;N request has been submitted to the. City requesting that the discharge and sale
of safe and s:no fireworks be permitted. It was also suggested that the
sale of fireworks be limited to civic and charitable groups, with a maximum
of one stand per 10,000 population.
Since 197.1, the sale of fireworks has been Preempted by State law. 'rile sale
of fireworks is now legal in the City; however, discharge is still prohibited.
If the discharge of safo and sine fireworks is not permitted, the City will
encounter serious law enforcement problems.
PI.COHMUNDA'I ION; It i, recommended that the City Council approve the proposed
ordinance permitting the discharge of safe and sane fireworks. It is further
recommended that the Foothill Fire District be asked to establish a permit
procedure to make certain that all safety regulations are complied with. The
City staff will assist the Fire District in preparing the procedure if requested.
7. City Manager's Reports.
a. Recommendation regarding the i.case of the Sheriff's Substation
Facilities.
The city has over the past few months spent considerable time looking for
a suitable location for our sheriff's substation. It is the staff's
recommendation that the most practical location for the sheriff's office
in Rancho Cucamonga is in an industrial complex located on 9th Street,
east of Hellman Avenue. The building is owned by the A. II. Reiter Develop-
ment Co. of Costa Mesa. The facility consists of approximately 6,000
square feet. The immediate need for the Sheriff's Department is for 4,000
square feet; however, it is important that the city and the Sheriff's
Department have adequate storage space.
(, -G
The lease price, based on a five -year contract, is approximately §i4,$B
per month. This represents a square footage cost of5�4. cents for the *,�G
facilities. It is important to note that one of the requirements for
the sheriff's station is that there be adequate parking, not only for
sheriff's use, but also for the private vehicles of those employed in the
sheriff's office. While the site contains approximately 1,000 feet greater
than needed, the property owner has indicated his willingness to negotiate
the lease for only the amount of space needed by the city. One dis-
advantage to the site is that it is approximately .i'1 miles south of city
hall. Unfortunately, all of the available building,, with the exception
of one, are some distance away from city hall. Wo do not feel this will
greatly hamper our coordinated efforts with the Sheriff's Department.
RF:COM! II;NDAT ION: It is recommended that the staff be authorized to
negotiate with the property owner for the 6,000 square foot building
located on the south side of 9th Street, east of Hellman Avenue. It is
anticipated that the building will be completed prior to the time the
sheriff's contract begins in •July.
�i. Report regarding a Tree Preservation ordinance.
RGCOMMENDA'rtoN: It is recommended that the City apply and enforce
the existing regulations on an interim basis protective measure. in
addition it is further recommended that the staff be instructed to pre-
pare nn ordinance which will more closely align with the needs of Rancho
Cucamonga and will supersede the present regulations.
I_,;� Baseline Common Use Agreement.
Submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council for consideration and
,approval is a Common Use Agreement between San Bernardino County Flood
District and the City. This Common Use Agreement is for property the
District uses for their Underground Cucamonga Storm Drain in which the
proposed Baseline project between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue will
need for construction. There are no funds involved in this Agreement.
��i
r� d. !✓Appeal of planning Commission Decision regarding Zone Change -- Index No.
C J /'/$
The City has received an appeal from McCutchan and Associates, 2100 Foothill
Boulevard, Pasudoni, l'aliforaia, appealing the Planning Commission denial
of the propsed zono change from R -2 to C -2. The property is located in the
City Council
Agenda
-2-
May
17, 1978
7. City Manager's Reports.
a. Recommendation regarding the i.case of the Sheriff's Substation
Facilities.
The city has over the past few months spent considerable time looking for
a suitable location for our sheriff's substation. It is the staff's
recommendation that the most practical location for the sheriff's office
in Rancho Cucamonga is in an industrial complex located on 9th Street,
east of Hellman Avenue. The building is owned by the A. II. Reiter Develop-
ment Co. of Costa Mesa. The facility consists of approximately 6,000
square feet. The immediate need for the Sheriff's Department is for 4,000
square feet; however, it is important that the city and the Sheriff's
Department have adequate storage space.
(, -G
The lease price, based on a five -year contract, is approximately §i4,$B
per month. This represents a square footage cost of5�4. cents for the *,�G
facilities. It is important to note that one of the requirements for
the sheriff's station is that there be adequate parking, not only for
sheriff's use, but also for the private vehicles of those employed in the
sheriff's office. While the site contains approximately 1,000 feet greater
than needed, the property owner has indicated his willingness to negotiate
the lease for only the amount of space needed by the city. One dis-
advantage to the site is that it is approximately .i'1 miles south of city
hall. Unfortunately, all of the available building,, with the exception
of one, are some distance away from city hall. Wo do not feel this will
greatly hamper our coordinated efforts with the Sheriff's Department.
RF:COM! II;NDAT ION: It is recommended that the staff be authorized to
negotiate with the property owner for the 6,000 square foot building
located on the south side of 9th Street, east of Hellman Avenue. It is
anticipated that the building will be completed prior to the time the
sheriff's contract begins in •July.
�i. Report regarding a Tree Preservation ordinance.
RGCOMMENDA'rtoN: It is recommended that the City apply and enforce
the existing regulations on an interim basis protective measure. in
addition it is further recommended that the staff be instructed to pre-
pare nn ordinance which will more closely align with the needs of Rancho
Cucamonga and will supersede the present regulations.
I_,;� Baseline Common Use Agreement.
Submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council for consideration and
,approval is a Common Use Agreement between San Bernardino County Flood
District and the City. This Common Use Agreement is for property the
District uses for their Underground Cucamonga Storm Drain in which the
proposed Baseline project between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue will
need for construction. There are no funds involved in this Agreement.
��i
r� d. !✓Appeal of planning Commission Decision regarding Zone Change -- Index No.
C J /'/$
The City has received an appeal from McCutchan and Associates, 2100 Foothill
Boulevard, Pasudoni, l'aliforaia, appealing the Planning Commission denial
of the propsed zono change from R -2 to C -2. The property is located in the
City Council Agenda -3- May 17, 1978
7. City Manager's Reports ... (continood)...
general area of the northeast corner of Baker Avenue, north of 9th
Street and south of Arrow Route in Cucamonga. the applicant has requested
that the zone be changed in order to conform more closely with the
zoning on adjacent parcels. The primary reason for the Planning Com-
mission's denial was based upon the fact that the City is currently pre-
paring a General Plan and �oning Mlap to cover all of the community. The
applicant, the appelant, has requested the City Council make a finding to
continue the hearing in lieu of a denial of the zone change request.
RECOMBIEND:IT ION: If the City Council wishes to hear the appeal, it is
recommended that it be set for Council consideration on Wednesday,
June 7, 1978.
''e. A Resolution regarding the Sheep Mountain Wilderness Area.
Proposed Resolution submitted by the City of Glendora endorsing and
supporting the creation and designation of the Sheep Mountain Wilderness
Area in the Angeles and San Bernardino National Forests.
The Council has requested that the staff review the resolution of the
City of Glendora supporting the creation of a Sheet .Mountain Wilderness
Area in the Angeles and San Bernardino National Forests. Inasmuch as the
Proposed area does not directly impact the City of Rancho Cucamonga, it is
recommended that no City Council action be taken. If the City Council
wishes to support the proposal, an appropriate resolution will be drafted
for your review.
8. City Attorney Reports.
9. Consent Calendar.
7 "III: FOLLOWING CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ROUTINE AND NON-
CONTROVERSIAL. 'THEY WILL BE .ACTED UPON BY TILE COUNCIL. AT ONE TIME WITHOUT
DISCUSSION. ANY COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF MEMBER OR INTERF:STEII PARTY MAY
Rr.QUI;ST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR LATER
DISCUSSION.
.fl. "Tract 8958: Release Performance Bond (Sewer) in the amount of $18,000
and Performance Bond (Water) in the amount of $25,000 to Coral Investment,
Inc.
b. Tract 921: Accept roads located at the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue
and Victoria Street.
'c. M.S. No. 76 -0648: Accept an Instrument of Credit and Agreement in the
amount of $5,400 for road improvements on Amethyst Avenue.
c. Approval of bills.
10. New Business.
a. Appointment of an Auditor. This will 1) � an oral report.
11. Adjournment. a 'F
�L' ,_. ♦` )k.GAa- c- ,t�((''RANI �J��,c'-A�I -r.Y' �i'l�lr.ck 45 -'l.
ORDINANCE NO. _24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby has these added
responsibilities and is authorized and directed to enforce all the provisions
of this Ordinance and all other Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga now
in force or hereafter adopted, relating to zoning, sub - division or building codes.
SECTION 2: The Community Development Director shall be appointed to
these additional responsibilities by resolution of the City Council and his /her
appointment shall continue during good behavior and satisfactory service. During
temporary absences or disability of the Community Development Director, the
Governing Body of the City shall designate an acting Community Development Director.
SECTION 3: Permits Required: No person, firm or corporation shall erect,
construct, enlarge or improve any building or structure in the City or cause the
same to be done without first obtaining a separate development permit for each
such building or structure.
a. Within areas subject to flooding separate development permits
are required for all new construction, substantial improvements and other
developments, including the placement of mobile homes.
b. Application: To obtain a permit, the applicant shall first file
an application thereTor in writing on a form furnished for that purpose. Every
such application shall:
1. Identify and describe the work to be covered by the permit
for which application is made.
2. Describe the land on which the proposed work is to be done
by lot, block, tract and house and street address, or
similar description that will readily identify and definitely
locate the proposed building or work.
3. Indicate the use or occupancy for which the proposed work
is intended.
4. Be accompanied by plans and specifications for proposed
construction.
5. Be signed by the permittee or his authorized agent who
may be required to submit evidence to indicate such
authority.
6. Within designated flood prone areas, be accompanied by
elevations (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest
habitable floor (including basement) or in the case of
floodproofed non - residential structures, the elevation to
which it has been floodproofed. Documentation or
certification of such elevations will be maintained by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
7. Give such other information as reasonably may be required by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 4: The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall review all development
permit applications to determine if the site of the proposed development
is reasonably safe from flooding and that all necessary permits have been
received as required by Federal or State Law.
olk-
SECTION 5: The Community Development Director in reviewing all applications
for new construction, substantial improvements, prefabricated buildings, placement
of mobile homes and other development(s) (as defined in Section II of this Ordinance)
will:
a. Obtain review and reasonably utilize, if available, any regulatory
flood elevation data from Federal, State or other sources, and require within
areas subject to flooding that the following performance standards be met:
1. The first -floor elevation (to include basement) of new
residential structures, be elevated to or above the
regulatory flood elevation.
2. The first -floor elevation (to include basement of non-
residential structures) be elevated or floodproofed to
or above the regulatory flood elevation.
b. Required the use of construction materials and utility equipment
that are resistant to flood damage.
c. Require the use of construction methods and practices that will
minimize flood damage.
d. Be designed or anchored to prevent the flotation, collapse or
lateral movement of the structure or portions of the structure due to flooding.
e. Assure that in regard to mobile homes, specific anchoring
requirements are:
1. Over- the -top ties be provided at each of the four corners
of the mobile home with two additional ties per side at
the intermediate locations and mobile homes less than
50 feet long requiring one additional tie per side.
2. Frame ties be provided at each corner of the home with
five additional ties per side at intermediate points and
mobile homes less than 50 feet long requiring four
additional ties per side.
3. All components of the anchoring system be capable of
carrying a force of 4800 pounds.
4. Any additions to mobile homes he similarly anchored.
SECTION 6: The Governing Body of the City shall review all subdivision
applications and shall make findings of fact and assure that:
a. All such proposed developments are consistent with the need
to minimize flood damage.
b. Subdivision proposals and other proposed new development
greater than five (5) acres of fifty (50) lots, whichever is lesser, include
within such proposals regulatory flood elevation data in areas subject to
flooding.
c. Adequate drainage is provided sa as to reduce exposure to flood
hazards.
d. All public utilities and facilities are located so as to minimize
or eliminate flood damage.
SECTION 1: New Water and Sewer, etc. - New and replacement water and sewer
systems s hall t,e constructed to eliminate or minimize infiltration by, or
discharge into floodwaters. Moreover, on -site waste disposal systems will
be designed to avoid impairment or contamination during flooding.
-2-
-3-
SECTION 8: The Governing Body
of the City will insure that the flood
carrying capacity within the altered or
relocated portion of any watercourse
is maintained. The City will notify, in
rivering situations, adjacent communities
and the State Coordinating Office prior
to any alteration or relocation of a
watercourse, and submit copies of such
notifications to the Administrator.
SECTION 9: Definition: Unless
specifically defined below, works or
phrases used in this Ordinance shall be
interpreted so as to give them the same
meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this Ordinance its most
reasonable application.
AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
- The land within a community subject
to a one percent or greater change of
flooding in any given year. This
land is identified as Zone A on the
official map.
DEVELOPMENT
- Any man -made change to improved or
unimproved real estate, including
but not limited to buildings or
other structures, mining, dredging
filling, grading, paving, excavation
or drilling operations.
FLOOD
- A temporary rise in stream's flow
or stage that results in water
overflowing its banks and inundating
areas adjacent to the channel or
an unusual and rapid accumulation
of runoff or surface waters from
any source.
FLOODPROOFING
- Any combination of structural and
non - structural additions, changes,
or adjustments to structures,
including utility and sanitary
facilities, which would preclude
the entry of water. Structural
components shall have the capability
of resisting hydrostatic and
hydrodynamic loads and the effect
of buoyancy.
HABITABLE FLOOR
- Any floor used for living which
includes working, sleeping, eating,
cooking or recreation or combination
thereof. A floor used only for
storage purposes is not a "habitable
floor."
MOBILE HOME
- A structure, transportable in one
or more sections, which is built
on a permanent chassis and designed
to be used with or without a permanent
foundation when connected to the required
utilities. It does not include recreational
vehicles or travel trailers.
MOBILE HOME PARK
"Mobile Home Subdivision" means a parcel
(SUBDIVISION)
_
(or contiguous parcels) of land which
has been divided into two or more lots
for rent or sale and the placement of
mobile homes.
REGULATORY FLOOD ELEVATION
- The water surface elevation of the
100 -year flood.
STRUCTURE
- A walled and roofed structure, including
a gas or liquid storage tank that is
principally above the ground, including
but without limitation to buildings,
factories, sheds, cabins, mobile homes and
other similar uses.
-3-
0
0
SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT
- "Substantial improvement means any
repair, reconstruction or improvement
of a structure, the cost of which equals
or exceeds 50 percent of the market value
of the structure either (a) before the
improvement is started, or (b) if the
structure has been damaged and is being
restored before the damage occurred.
For the purposes of this definition
"substantial improvement" is considered
to occur when the first alteration of
any wall, ceiling, floor or other
structural part of the building commences
whether or not that alteration affects
the external dimensions of the structure.
The term does not, however, include
any alteration to comply with existing
State or local health, sanitary,
building or safety codes or regulations
as well as structures listed in National
or State Registers of historic places.
100 -YEAR FLOOD
- The condition of flooding having a one
percent chance of annual occurrence.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this
_ day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
-4-
0
ORDINANCE NO.
L
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA
PEP21ITTING THE DISCHARGE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SEC. 1. Except as provided in Section 2 of this ordinance, safe
and sane fireworks may he discharged in the City.
SEC, 2. Safe and sane fireworks shall not be discharged in the
City
(a) Except during the period of 12 00 o'clock noon on the
20th of June through 12:00 o'clock noon on tie 6th of July of the
same calendar year;
(b) If a fire nuisance would result from such discharge;
(c) Upon public property, n udi ng public streets and
highways or
(d) Upon private property, except by, or with the consent
of,the owner or tenants lawfully in Possession thereof.
SEC. 3. Any person discharging safe and sane fireworks in the
City,except as permitted by this ordinance, is guilty of a mis-
demeanor.
SEC. 4. All words and phrases used in this ordinance w' ch are
defined in the State fireworks law shall have the same meaning
as in said law. \�
Passed, approved and adopted this _ day of �, 1978.
M } of
ATTEST:
'.
1
Crty C erk
v
4NTER- OFFICE ME100
DATE March 31, 1978
FROM THOMAS WICKUM
Captain
TO LOREN WASSERMAN
City Manager, Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT AVAILABLE SITES FOR SHERIFF'S OFFICE
PHONE
wn urn�wlno t
The following is a list of four sites within the City of Rancho Cucamonga
capable of housing the city's Sheriff's Offices:
SITE NUMBER 1: Baseline 6 Hillman (3200 square feet available)
Lessor: A.H. Reiter
3188 Pullman
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (714) 751 -4594
Description of Propert
2200 square feet of office space located in the southwest corner of the
"Reiter Building" which is presently under construction. This location would
be immediately south of, but attached to, the City Hall. This space would
house the Investigative and Administrative functions of the Sheriff's Office.
The office space presently being used by the city (1000 square feet) would be
required to house the patrol force.
Cost: $.48 per square foot ($1056 per month) for the 2200 square feet. Unknown
coat for the 1000 square feet of office space which has already been leased by
the city. Cost may require multi -year contract.
Parking: Three spaces just off Baseline (not suitable for night parking) and
three spaces behind new city hall.
Pointe to Consider: #1 Part of city complex - convenience of citizens.
112 Split comand (not believed to be a significant
problem due to the close proximity).
#3 3200 square feet is minimum acceptable space; no
room for growth.
114 Lack of sufficient dedicated parking for Sheriff units.
SITE NUMBER 2: Hillman 6 9th Street (6000 square feet)
Lessor:
A.H. Reiter
3188 Pullman
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (714) 751 -4594
0 0
(2)
Descriution of Prooert
6000 square foot building located in a primarily industrial area. The
building is part of an industrial complex. The interior will be modified to
a typical business office. The building is larger than is needed. Originally
it was estimated that the Sheriff would require 4000 square feet for the
first two to three years and then an additional thousand square feet for a
total of 5000 square feet.
Cost: $.48 per square foot ($1680 per month) based on a five year contract.
Parking: Sufficient parking for Sheriff's units.
Points to Consider: #1 Approximately 3 -1/2 miles from city hall.
#2 Will install gas pump upon agreement.
#3 1,000 square feet larger than needed. Could
possibly be used as storage area for both the Sheriff's office and city
supplies or indoor parking if unit parking becomes a problem.
SITE NUMBER 3: 10244 E. Arrow Highway (5208 square feet)
Lessor: Albert Marcarian
10244 E. Arrow Highway
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Telephone: (714) 987 -7496
Description of Property:
5208 square feet building located in a rural /residential area of Cucamonga.
This building was originally built for the business offices of a power line
construction company. The building has ample individual office space to
meet the needs of a police agency for the next five years. The building is
carpeted and is in relatively good condition, however, some modification,
painting and cleaning up would be required. The lessor wants to be respon-
sible for maintenance of major items only i.e. air conditioning, water heaters,
etc. Landscaping, glass breakage, etc. he prefers that the leases accept the
responsibility for.
Cost: Leasor requests that the city set the rent figure. Reporting officer
suggests that $.25 - $.30 per square foot would be fair considering that the
city would be accepting responsibility for minor maintenance and gardening
and possibly installation of fence for secure parking.
Parking: 38 paved parking spaces on site of building. Also will furnish
an area to the rear of the building for helicopter landing and parking for
Sheriff units.
0
(3)
Points to Consider: $1 This is the only site that has large gas tanks and
pumps already installed. City could use up to four tanks for gas storage
for both cars and aviation fuel.
#2 Appears to have unlimited parking if city wished to
store equipment.
03 Located about five miles southeast of city hall on
the border of a high crime rate area (north town, one mile south).
#4 If the city were able to lease this property at
$.25 - $.30 per square foot for a period of five years a considerable savings
to the city could be realized.
#5 Capabilities of landing a helicopter in this city
without annoying residents is a plus factor for city administrators.
SITE NUMBER 4: 7080 Archibald Avenue, Alta Loma (4000 square feet)
Lessor: Mike or Jack Stevens
7070 Archibald Avenue
Alta Loma, CA
Telephone: (714) 989 -1711
Description of Property:
4000 square foot office attached to an equipment rental building. This office
is located in a non - residential area about 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue
between Baseline and 19th Street in Alta Loma. This is an industrial type
building that will be modified to look like a typical office building. It
has a fenced -in parking area for Sheriff's unite.
Cost: $.43 per square foot ($1840 per month). This figure was based on three
years and would have a penalty clause if less than three. If five year con-
tract were offered, cost per square foot would be considerably less.
Parking: Sufficient parking for Sheriff's units; however, employee parking
marginal.
Points to Consider: O1 Will install gas tank and pump.
#2 About one mile east of city hall.
03 Centrally located to most residences in the community.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Site #3, 10244 E. Arrow Highway, Cucamonga (5208 square
feet) be selected as the city's Sheriff's station. This site meets all the
needs of a police station as far as office space, unit parking, citizen park-
ing, helicopter landing and fueling needs of Sheriff units, city cars, etc.
Although the location is not as desirable as the others it is relatively con-
venient to find. The major problem is its close proximity to north town. The
building and its occupants could become targets for malicious mischief, snipings,
etc. Certain security measures would have to be implemented i.e., drapes on
windows, fenced in yards, etc.
0 0
May 10, 1978
Resolution to the City Council, Rancho Cucamongv:
that representatives from the community of ntiwanda
be included on the City Planning Commission. The following
names are prepared for your conoideration:
Fa. Jae 'ihite
Etiwanda, Ca. 91)39
Er. Ray 'Trujillo
6656 'East Avenue
Y.L. dcx 72
Etiwanda, Ca. 91739 899 -1092
Mr. Dan 3-.er
7432 Hyssor drive
Etiwanda, Ca. 91739 9P9 -3409
r'
'j u
4
0 0
MEMORANDUM
To: Lauren Wasserman
From: Bill Holley
Date: May 12, 1978
Subject: Tree Preservation Ordinance
Per Council directive of May 3, regarding construction of an "Interim"
tree ordinance, find the following:
There exists in the San Bernardino County Code, which was adopted by
reference for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, regulations for Tree Preservation.
Specifically: Title 6, Division 5, Chapter 2 (see attached)
Note: The term "Native Tree" is used in this Chapter and defined under
66.022. In the City Attorney's opinion, this definition can be interpreted
as being applicable to the Eucalyptus Trees in Rancho Cucamonga.
Comment: The necessary regulation for tree preservation exist. It is a
matter of proper application and proper enforcement.
Recommendation: 1). Apply and enforce existing regulations.
2). Prepare an ordinance which will more closely align
with the needs of Rancho Cucamonga and will supercede
the present regulations.
BH /mh
'1b
66.02I 66.022 LAND USE. WILDING REGULATIONS
66.021 1'urpnse and Illlelll.
Ili• I'm ...u,ns .,I Ihi, chaplel ;Ile marled to rceuhbc the I.vee scale
maw% 11 of In m;!. natis0 bee, in the unincnl pore led masts al' $.m Boreal Jinn
('nun ll' 011 prnperq m conlhmattons of pmperl}' under single oscnardlip,
;_IC.0'T than Iwenit Ihouvuld 1'0.01111) .quvr Ieet, end specifically to
corn pie Tile I l the 1071 State Po, est I'r.Iclicrs Act in providing for the
cnnsenalioll mill wise use of our 101CM resources.
66.11_'_' Ucl'inilions.
••\ppl'll,ttl SIIUeblrt \ sll'UCIIII'e or 11.ocd mc,i of IIIIlIc I'Nlllls
sub.t:ma whlJl has hccn apps ovcJ In Building Deparlmeol as an
IMPIMfnlent nl the sec and Mild enllllAws Willi all codes, Ofd l It it [ices it [it)
reglJalions of Sdil Belnerdin0('nunq.
" D. ul utl I rce " Any Ircc vuhhod 61 a Ircc cspctl. a <dchlic;l in Ibis
dlapter. wluJl I. J;unace(1 by in sect a. 9no g, fire, disease or other mu Ural or
mammadc causes.
"Notice '•• Ml'le's which grata OI lico nalumlly in San Bclnaolinn
('milm. ill'imi le .Inog. I.C%W nl hccn Introduced as 11,111 01 .I lel OlCst-Li011
propl,lm. Mrs shall not be construed to mean (roil or ou Pbearing trees.
orchunb, pllulled landsc ping. or commercul nun wrp Stoll„
"I'CIInll'" \n5 per>on. Iron. parhlcrship. ass0ciabon, corporation,
cnnlp.un. nl olcamiaunn nl'.nll I,md.
,.Rrmme:•. (o ail down. fell. push aver, dig up, burn. poison. severely
prune mll Ihal death of the Ircc in caused. or destroy a tree in any manner.
"Spc. In,Cn I Ice'.• . \ns ace will, a lool b.11l gic act that a 20-gallo t
cantamcl.asdcllncJ b\ n nnnmclrlal 11111Mnl.nl
"I Ice An} woody pLml having one well -del ineJ stem Dual it more or
Icss dcfunlvh IlmnCd 'I'mv, Ihul not excluding unblalched cactuses.
„old palnnt ,wd of Loam_ *on,ttshcic nl it, nalm.11 or pl;uticd range :I
hcighl of at least eight IRl feel mxl a diameter of not less than two (22)
incites.
1122741 484.2
Chapter 2
I REE PRESERVATION
Sections:
waft' 1
I'nrpo'c and Intent.
w0 I
Dotinitrons.
w"O-,?
Scope.
('(014
Permit Required,
66.0_5
I'mmi Application.
(4,026
Issuance.
w,01,
1 nfora•nunt.
b6.11 =5
\ppcul.
66.0 2q
Separability,
66.021 1'urpnse and Illlelll.
Ili• I'm ...u,ns .,I Ihi, chaplel ;Ile marled to rceuhbc the I.vee scale
maw% 11 of In m;!. natis0 bee, in the unincnl pore led masts al' $.m Boreal Jinn
('nun ll' 011 prnperq m conlhmattons of pmperl}' under single oscnardlip,
;_IC.0'T than Iwenit Ihouvuld 1'0.01111) .quvr Ieet, end specifically to
corn pie Tile I l the 1071 State Po, est I'r.Iclicrs Act in providing for the
cnnsenalioll mill wise use of our 101CM resources.
66.11_'_' Ucl'inilions.
••\ppl'll,ttl SIIUeblrt \ sll'UCIIII'e or 11.ocd mc,i of IIIIlIc I'Nlllls
sub.t:ma whlJl has hccn apps ovcJ In Building Deparlmeol as an
IMPIMfnlent nl the sec and Mild enllllAws Willi all codes, Ofd l It it [ices it [it)
reglJalions of Sdil Belnerdin0('nunq.
" D. ul utl I rce " Any Ircc vuhhod 61 a Ircc cspctl. a <dchlic;l in Ibis
dlapter. wluJl I. J;unace(1 by in sect a. 9no g, fire, disease or other mu Ural or
mammadc causes.
"Notice '•• Ml'le's which grata OI lico nalumlly in San Bclnaolinn
('milm. ill'imi le .Inog. I.C%W nl hccn Introduced as 11,111 01 .I lel OlCst-Li011
propl,lm. Mrs shall not be construed to mean (roil or ou Pbearing trees.
orchunb, pllulled landsc ping. or commercul nun wrp Stoll„
"I'CIInll'" \n5 per>on. Iron. parhlcrship. ass0ciabon, corporation,
cnnlp.un. nl olcamiaunn nl'.nll I,md.
,.Rrmme:•. (o ail down. fell. push aver, dig up, burn. poison. severely
prune mll Ihal death of the Ircc in caused. or destroy a tree in any manner.
"Spc. In,Cn I Ice'.• . \ns ace will, a lool b.11l gic act that a 20-gallo t
cantamcl.asdcllncJ b\ n nnnmclrlal 11111Mnl.nl
"I Ice An} woody pLml having one well -del ineJ stem Dual it more or
Icss dcfunlvh IlmnCd 'I'mv, Ihul not excluding unblalched cactuses.
„old palnnt ,wd of Loam_ *on,ttshcic nl it, nalm.11 or pl;uticd range :I
hcighl of at least eight IRl feel mxl a diameter of not less than two (22)
incites.
1122741 484.2
• •
IRE 11. PR ISF.R\'nnaN 66.023 66,024
"I I,e I'\p,l l'.' Iot the Pm po,o, nl IhR c11,1I1tcr. ,I It,el,lvrrd
Pw I,,,IPnal 1x11,1 ,1r. a 11,1111,,1,1 I :mdscgn• Architect, of a Piotesvional
Bolan Pl .hall Ix a,n,ideml a Ire, opt 11
"\'Mdalion " I'tic Icnlo,al nl each sepmate We shall he considered a
up'mate violation.
66.02.; Senile.
1.11 Ihc "lo'I,lon, M Ili, .11.111 x1,1,1. In hoc\ -Ir.\i ing nn
pi i\atc Iand ttlthln tltr uninirnpul x1'11 .w,.l, III' %.In Rernardno (lmnk did
In hec, gml,mg an public ('and uwncd he Ihc If oulm of San Bernardino.
c\ccpl .1, nolvd.
tbl 'Ihc plm nnnn o1' till, '11.11,101 :uc not x1,1,1.1 x1.11 lo,
111 \Iq lien b,l 111, ,11 align\ conducted wide, Ihc I ole,l I't'lowe
,\1I of It)-, 3 (111\1,IOn 4. 1'Ila11lvr S, Public Koomwe, (bd') unlc,e a
Imilwrland ,Inn c,wm 11,111111 .II`Ph'a bon I, HI1d vrlih I11 Shti I olcOul.
L'I \m 1111 tenoned nn I,11d, ,I, ncd I,% III, IlnMCd Stale,
(Im VI 1111, 111 al Ihc St.ttc of (.1111miM,l. 111 am Occ rv11um,It by 11., (bunk'
nl San limuldmo \c11'h ry pelt of .1 pllocct 111x1 Im, heel) im wed for
ell%lromn, nhd 111111.'1.
I ?I \n) public twin\ ,uhl,cl to nnndl'Mon, of Ihc Public
11016„ ('11..11... „Ion of .ml nlhel 1ondltulld 11uh11c agcnq'. \vhcry In
maintain ,d11 Igh'mhoo III lacdllles undel' their Iw,i,dlcllon. (Ice, are primed.
lopped. of Iq.1,id.
111 hiwcl - dnn,ac,d Ile, and Irecs Icnimed m Iirebrc A,. by
Ihc ('u1i(orli Ll Ei,l,ion of 1 olc,il,.
151 \II 1,1,1111'11 II;,, „Inv 11 are not n.11n, to Ihc polticular
1,x1 ,111 m qu„IIOl1. Mlle„ the Ilde I, p.nl nl I Ietolc,l'a Mon I'lo;•rem.
Ill \n) not Nkjmlod to hi ronuncd h\ Who uul,,. oldulane,a
Ill tae, nl' San Iiern.Irdmo ( nmllc. 11., Slate at ( illlomw I the united
Slates'.
171 Ihc„ aln,h liv an muucdl.dc t111'cat to the Public h,allll.
5alcty ar w011.11e .Ind rcgnirl enl,lgen \ I,nlm ;d.
(SI : \m pli,me p11,11cm or comPinaMon 111 pricalc ploperlics
tender nulgic a\vnir,lI i p. of 41,000 m Iua n• Ieel of less.
1.61124 I'vrmil Retilircd.
\111 1,,1 \on 1111.' ,hall \110111111 Il mo\c.1 hhmg. 11,11111 ilce e'llll 11,I'I\
tee 111,11 of grc,111r ,lent ,h:nnl el rn 111110I 11'11 inche, Ill inland ,11111x•
111, I..u,d A Iolll .Ind ,Im: hall (41:111,1 Mbmc I1., In rL1g, ground loel of
III, •,I,1 n: III, 1,1.1 ^l. , .`1,1 ,L 111 111,1111 ( ]MI I „I of glJ Ito ill 11,9LIII. m
1.n nn 1,11x111; d. ,11,111 lu,t nbl.un a 1,%111111 to do ,o nl anold \%till Ihc
putu'dole, VI loch In M1n,hmpl'l In 11., dc,otl pouum, ol',.In Killmdino
("11111\. a\ d,ImcO by Mre S.In 11, 111.1111 nu.('omit,(wn,l.d I'Lul. lhi, dwIll,r
,11.111 1pph In h%mg. wlt\e 1.1,\ \\0th \tom, lour 141 mew, of glvat,1 111
dlmnetel or Iwchc and Iwo.1hird, 112.2131 inche, in cireuntference nr eight
4S 1.3 117)1111
0 0
66.025 66.027 LAND USE, BUILDING REGULATIONS
IHI let" nr crc;llcr ill Ilcirlll. A tcc, as c%Iah1i%hcd by the Ifoad Ill'
Supem"'I"'11:111 hr paid to Ilse I'mlronnlenlal Improvrnlent Agrncy Ior the
pm'po'o of (101.Iping the Co%t% of procea%Ine an on -sl lc inglcclion. An
111111 aced nlhdi\ n1oo..ily apprlwal. or building permit %hall .uh<titule to, n
pernut to Icmole IIvInu. ndlile Irce' In urea' clown to he Covered lit,
propowd slruclures and paced aria. and no tee shall he charged Ill this Caw".
66.11]5 Prowl Application.
\ppliclhon fo1 a p; 1lnil to rrnuoc a hemp, n.11 itr her 'hull hr made m
%\Iilln;� r any office nl the I'milollnlcnlal Imprmemoot Aoenr\, un
Ill o\nlyd IornIN. Sal( :glpIICat Ion 'hall ($1111.1'1 a 111.111 %howing the minlber
and I""Itioll 01 Ures In Po an dawn or milo%ed and 1 bricl''tatenaml of the
1ppk mt\ intent regardnlg the I'ulurr Ilse of the property and the reason for
rcnlu%al.
,t 66.0]6 I'walm,
l'pnn 1(,(1111 nl' nn aphlir:lllnn Ior n pc nail. Ihr I ncu'on10 %ollul
Imp1 n'.enlrrf`.A�wV- \dnioI%tl,d oy or its lutholi /cd agent % %ill imperl the
pr;nnsr% and dr1e11111nr sllcffvr or not said Urea sleet the a'itel'ie for
it to'.d the .11111tiialian llm\ he wivile( Io w1olhil depattnn'nl or to an
�q�pli,hn.l t, onnntiller of Ihr ptdnnin;, Ionuni%slon I'ol 1 IvIlml and
rrc nnm: ^.1da h�nl an to Ihr I'l:nunne ('ammiwion Ill a public hcalim., 4
In In•..'. n,llitr lire or (ice, ma \ he renloce( when one of IIIe Iollnamg
hndmc' is Ivod,
1.11 the rl,n(IIIOn of Iho Ilrr It 1111 Iespecl Ia danl,Igr- dam lot of
L11,11 ,i1 %pn,Vin11V tocvishngnrpuglowd sh'IlAlures'. or m ctslor Aedsldnd
dr n.nt, I, Ill, 11 i, ingl.nline Ile III, 11th .III( \I;:n1 Ill III; 1'orc%I stand, is such
that it is Ill the lurtherance of Ile public health. salelc or \ecll,Ire to permit
its rcmm al.
(11) 1im Iocalon of tle Irce neclglie% Ile site of an propowd
:gynrrvrd 'Irurh11C or p.nctt arc;1, In moue LUn arras. the applicanl shall
lIa%i ^n I's 'Imleet '1101 Illa1 Iwelll \' I1CfCClit ( 'll';) Ot Coll IlIC1'elal.
.Idnonnllaloe pll't"110n11. ;nld 11111161111 - re%idenhal phliecl% remain in
Ihru''.111'.11. ondv%olaped wMitlnn, fill) penrnl (SW I of tins ;sea %hall
Ile Ior.ncJ in the frnnl \:nd 11r.1 or \Nlhle 1'1mn the puhhc Ihoroughlarc.
66.1127 h.nforeemeul.
Ial Ihr Itim I'IOn% of llns vhaplcl shall he %'Inked l\ 1111\'
aotholiied me nlhrt of the I mil omncnl.d Inlprocemcnl Agency. and may Ile
enforied by 111%('aldalnla DI%slon o1 Forest(%.
1111 Ao\ prison \IOhd ime )Tit of the proci%iom of this chapter shall Ile
gulit5 Ill a , Ilpon i,,Im, Ilan the rent, panishahle h\ a line of
nol more tlall live hundre( dollars IS500.00) or by imprisonment in the
f 12 2741 4911 -4
a •
TREE PRESERVATION 66.028 — 66.029
(-malty Jail fora period of not more than six 161 inonthS or by both such
fine and imprisonment.
let In addition, for every tree illegally removed, a specimen tree of
the cmx species from commercial nursery Stock shall be planted in (lie
10C.It1011 of the Ienroeed tree within si\ 1fI months. If. in the opinion of a
tree e\perl, a replacement tree of the same species could not IV in the
interest of the public health, safety and welfare, another species mey he
suhslinded, it ;Ipproeed by a tree expert. All replacement trees. which are
certified aS dead by a tree e\perl, shall Ile innnedi;ncly replaced by the
misdemeanant. Until a replaceoVat tree I056een crowing in place for five 151
\cars. Should the misdenre;mant Gail to replace a dead replacement tree
within ;ix 161 montlUS tiller notification by the C011llty', the County %'ulf
cnnlraet to hare such tree replaced •and place alien upon the Subject
property to cover the replacement costs.
66.028 .Appeal.
Any person agpne.ed 1•y an :act or determination of the I ncironmcnlal
Inq,rovement Agency Administrator in the e\ercise of the authorilc eloped
helem Sllall Mace the Iielll to appeal to the planning ('onuuission. Ali appe;d
dtall he tiled on forms parntded, within thine 1.101 days of the
I(nvirmnla• n tal Inapro,cirwnt Agency Administrator's decision.
66.029 Separability.
II ;n\ +ection, suhse cli0n, vn0.•nce, clause. nr pbrise of Ihw elmpter is
hi am re;mon held to ba imalid nt unconsl ilulion al by the decision of a
court of cnmpelent Junsdiction, it shall not affect the renmming portions of
the chapter.
484 -S 1 122741
OITER- OFFICE ME*O
DATE April 26, 1978 ca;rvrr
aix mxenoixo
FROM JOHN R. SHONE PHONE 1203
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT BASE LINE COMMON USE AGREEMENT - H06440
Transmitted herewith to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council for consider-
ation and approval is a Common Use Agreement between San Bernardino
County Flood Control District and the City. This Common Use Agreement
is for property the District uses for their Underground Cucamonga Storm
Drain in which the proposed Base Line project between Hellman Avenue and
Archibald Avenue will need for construction.
There are no funds involved in this Agreement.
Upon favorable approval by the City Council and execution, please return
the original and four certified copies of the Agreement to this office
for processing through the Board of Supervisors. Upon execution by the
Board, we will send you a certified copy of the Agreement for your files.
JRS:AJG:pn
Attachments as noted
cc: Jim Kindig
Ron Roberds
Lee Fitzpatrick
n
OHN ft. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
?a
• BASE LINE H06440
Ia Anthony J. Gray
TranTransportation 2402
77)i7
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Irn
1H06440
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
STANDARD CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and boavvesen the San Bernardino County Flood
Control District, h,!r(!ipdftp.r called District, and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
hereinafter called CITY
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS F0t1.0%%S
:Ll';r 7 ,,,r ":,/ "! .... ... i, '(form . f "O'drd Sot forth r . ... ...... ........... ( to he Paid, :moon'
11 ?; "I'll, pen t'Ir ""I'll' nr ... . ..... I'le", ...... of ,o,ero, Ir . ........ o" and cares, for
.. ....... 't1111, t,thv, horns and ,o,wa ..... .. .... and / ddr ... M, :f ,,, I
WHEREAS, Base Line between Hellman Avenue and Archibald is a budgeted
construction contract project scheduled to be under construction late in 1978; and
WHEREAS, right of way owned in fee by the DISTRICT for the underground
Cucamonga Storm Drain is necessary for this project; and
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT' right of way necessary for the road project is
described on the attached "Mono Description" marked Exhibit "A" and made a part
hereof and a plat marked Exhibit "do and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT and CITY desire to enter into an agreement to define
responsibilities in this "Area of Common Use."
%OW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1.0 CITY SHALL
1.1 Acknowledge the right of DISTRICT to use "Area of Common Use" and
DISTRICT rights of way v for flood control and water conservation purposes
without need for any further permission from CITY; providing, however,
that any such use by DISTRICT shall not endanger, interfere or conflict
with the use by CITY or the traveling public, without first obtaining
approval as set forth hereinafter.
1.2 Submit to DISTRICT, at least 30 days in advance of work proposed, plans
for any proposed construction, reconstruction or maintenance within
of COMM011 ['Se," WIlk-11 MOY utilize, endanger, conflict or interfere
with flood control and water conservation facilities or their functional
operations, and obtain Written approval thereof from the Flood Centre.
Engineer of DISTRICT which approval shall not be withheld, provide leta , r
Any provisions on the revtav; side and referenced attachments hereof constitute a part of his are
incorporated herein in full. y
V
amt 3
the works contemplated will not, in the opinion of the Flood Control
Engineer of DISTRICT, unreasonably conflict or interfere with or en-
danger flood control and water conservation facilities or their
functional operation.
2.0 DISTRICT SHALL
2.1 Acknowledge the right of CITY, its successors, permittees, or assigns
to use Area of Common Use without need for any further permit or per-
mission from DISTRICT; providing, however, that any such use by CITY
shall not utilize, endanger, interfere, or conflict with flood control
and water conservation facilities or their functional operation without
first obtaining approval as set forth hereinbefore.
2.2. Submit to CITY, at least 30 days in advance of work proposed, plans for
any proposed construction, reconstruction or maintenance within Area of
Common Use, which may interfere or conflict with the public use of the
traveled way; and obtain written approval thereof from the City Engineer
of CITY, which approval shall not be withheld provided that the works
contemplated will not in the opinion of the City Engineer of CITY
unreasonably conflict or interfere with the public use of traveled way.
3.0 13E IT FURTHER AGREED THAT
3.1 1:�cept as expressly set forth herein, the agreement shall not in any
way alter, modifv or terminate DISTIif CT rights within "Area of Common
Use" in such manner as not to interfere unreasonably with the rights of
Elie other.
11 11 11 11
" I1 n n
0
0
3.2 Neither party to the agreement nor officer nor emplovees thereof shall be
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything
don, or omitted to be done by other party to the agreement under or in
connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to the
parties under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that
pursuant to Government Code Section 595.4, each party shall fully in-
demnify and hold the other harmless from any liability for injury (as
defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any -
thing done or omi Lted to be done or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction dolegated under this ogrewacnt.
THIS AGREEMENT, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the
successors and assigns of both parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed by their ruspeccive officials thereunto duly autiwrizod.
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
r_
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Dated
ATTESTED:
r
Secretary of the Food Control
I It rah- of ('on(rnttur 't III, it rurnauhwl � 00," ny W,
By
Dated
Title
Address
a,toI 'J"i ... {mmhnm
i
C.innny Off"..
0 .m r Cinnce r r�e•nnrn rtin„ Mminry
p 0212451) 491 i•, 7 , 3
_I .. • •
ENGINEERING 12131 763 -5162
PLANNING (2 ;a1 381.2362
SURVEYING
M G C U T C H A N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C.
2100 EAST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91107
Our Ref: 166 -0101
May 10, 1978
City Clerk
Rancho Cucamonga
9340 Baseline Road, Unit "A"
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Subject: Zone Change - Index No. W85 -86
Gentlemen:
Enclosed, in triplicate,is our appeal of the subject zone change denial.
Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $10@ for the appeal fee.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting this office.
Sincerely,
A
Encls
P7-%
y w
• • 166 -0101
r
ArrEAG T'0 Bf;10.F - SS4lP; lusstws Or
THE -C-O6 C ` Frnm
action h r'
Y CiditlU'Y- FIANN INC CphR1I8:'.J OI7
• ... ( DS�I.- Na= �I��"eCTi- 7iTi= F2i; =n F^nnrnctrt7)
DATE: May 10, 1978 INDEX NO: W85 -86
APPELLANT'S NAME: McCutchmt b Assocta
ADDRESS 2100 Fast Foothill Boulevard
Pasadena, Calif. 91107 (213)795 -5162
DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: March 22c 1978
NATURE OF APPLICATION CONSIDERED BY PLANNING COPRIISSION:
Zone Change from R -2 to C -2
ACTION TAKEN BY PLANNING CO*aIISSION: Zone change dented.
IF AN APPROVAL WAS GEa HUED STATE CONDITIONS ATTACHED BY MAIMING
COMISSION, IF ANY:_ _
PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION OF LAND INVOLVED: R -2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF PROD -U IT: Northeast corner of Baker Avenue
and north of Ninth Street and south of Arrow Route in- Cucamonga
Legal description attached.
NATURE OF THE APPEAL: Appeal the denial of change of zone case Index No. W85 -86.
RFASON FOR THE APPEAL:. (Herein set for.tO 1,4111-P thorn wns an error or abuse,
of. discretion by the r'oI;*ty manning Commission. 11 a zone variance Is
involved, appellant must also set forth particalnrs o:hevein application for
variarico did incr.t or did fail to meet requirerucnts as set forth in Section
Tic Minutes reflect the verbal rogilest to amend the application to C -1 from C -2 to
be more In keeping with adjacent zoning. The denial was based upon said change being
premature due to the current process of preparing new General Plan. Based upon the hearing
and findings, a motioft to continue the hearing until after the preparation of initial pre-
sentation of the General. Plan would be In order. tly appeal t.o ie City C cif in to maka
finding to continue the hearing until a stated date in
Ii etai al.o /7- ----
Date filed in Office of Clerk:
Fee: j( Date Paid: q -/1 /
i
Prep Are i;ii.Wri
>
IG _ GSGd - 010 'l rbef 4f
t M�Ai,:7'I
�y w
Parcel No. 1:
0
0
LEGAL. DESCRIP'Ii ON
N/E CORNER or BARER AVE. 6 9111 STREET
Cucamonga
it''. .1.01
That portion of Lot 23, Section 9, Township 1 south, range 7 west, San
Bernardino Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga lands, lying west and
north of the County Highway (knnwn as Arrow Route), nt the same exists
on said property, as per ply' recorded in book 4 of Yaps, page 9, records
of said County, together with that portion of "Iuth Street abandoned by
Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, a
certified copy of which was recorded .tune 24, 1964 in book 6176, page
455, Official Records.
excepting therefrom the north 311.5 feet of the west 247 feet thereof
measured from street centers.
Also excepting therefrom any portion in roads or highways.
Parcel No. 2:
An easement to lay a water pipe line over and across the north 311.5
feet of the west 247 feet of said Lot 23.
t �
.r
�• ,, 1
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF fHE CITY OF GI ENDORA, COUNTY
(IF LOS ANGELES, STATE DF CALIFORNIA, INTIORS ING -V40 SUPPORTING ,
THE CREATION AND DESIGNATION OF THE S;* EP 'GUN iA IN WILDERNESS
AREA ON THE ANGELES AND SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FORESTS.
k'11 E'f •S, the Sb,,•ep u...:ntail' R••ginn ,,lea c.,nt,,in, •.<.. of the most rnyged and
•.CCnie to: lain in Snuthe,n California; and
WHERt AS, said area is the bare for a b. -althy rn -runt Lnnd of Nrll:on bighorn
sheep; and
1,'HCRLAS, said area has clear water •.C. e,: ^s ,with a self- sustaining native fish
population; and
WHERIAS, consideration is now being green Iry the United States Forest Service
and others for the creation of such a wilderness area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GLENDORA AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council does hereby endorse and support the creation of
such a wilderness area with houndaries to be established which would include
essentially the currently remaining range of the East Fork Herd of bighorn sheep.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby urges that the boundaries for said wilder-
ness area •,pecifically include the Harrows down to Swan Pock, Allison Gulch, lower,
Coldwater Canyon, Pine Mountain Ridne .ind the northeast face of Mt. Baden - Powell _
on the f,ngeles Forest and also the Dawson Peak north slope Devils Backbone region
on the San Bernardino Forest.
SECTION 3: The City Council hereby directs that c,Dies Of this Resolution be
forwarded to Senator Alan Cranston, Senator S. I. Hayakawe, Congressman Jim Lloyd,
Congres;r,an John Pousselot, Supervisor Peter Echabarum, Assemblyman 'William Lancaster,
and the Chief, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
SILTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution rind the snme shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th day of March, 1978,
ATTEST: CITY OF GLENDORA
/s/ Culver F. Heaton, Jr. ` By; /s / ; -,ae !C. Finkbi_:er
Ci[Y Cl er k- - Y.ayor-
(SEAL)
I, Culver L. Hoatun, Jr, City Clerk of the City of Glendora, California, do
hereby u•,tify th.rt the Lnegoing it a fall, true .u,d Cn,rPtil copy of the original
Rt 501 U l ON NO. ] ",011 a•, n:,e „ a,o on fiI, in my of l ire; that ;, a:nr was
duly nlopI nd by the C i I y touncil; and iI,.rt it i. unw in full force and of feat.
DATED:
-- - -- City Clerk --
(SEAL)
700
LITER- OFFICE MEIN
DATE Flay 8, 1978 �i0crr
ur eci �n aono
FROM JOHN R. SHONE, Acting City Engineer PHONE 383 -1203 '
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN, City Manaaer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT NATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TRACT 8958, Release Bonds (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located on the west side of Hellman Avenue
north of San Bernardino Road.
Owner: Coral Investment, Inc.
540 South Pasadena avenue
Glendora, California 91740
Performance Bond (Sewer): $18,000.00 Surety
Performance Bond (Water): $25,000.00 Surety
NOTE: The above bonds have been approved for release by
the Department of Environmental Health Services.
1 i.' 1 /.
jR. HHONEHHONE
JRS:JPC:SM:ls
12- 1061.000 Bev. Ili) ?q
TITER- OFFICE ME*Q
DATE May 8, 1979 ) �� err.mivo
FROM JOHN R. SHONE, Acting City Engineer PHONE 383 -1203 "
TO LAUREN WASSERMAN, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT MATTERS TO HE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
This item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City Council:
TRACT 9224, Accept Roads (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located at the northeast corner of
Ramona Avenue and Victoria Street.
Owner: C/D Development Co.
7955 Orchard Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Note: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
gutter, paving, sidewalks and street signs.
JQHN R. SHONE
JRS:JPC:SM:IS
1.,
LITER- OFFICE
MEIP
UTE
April 27, 1978
FROM
JOHN R. SHONE PHONE 383 - 1203•`-'
/
Acting City Engineer
•1
TO
LAUREN WASSERMAN
City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NAME ROAD AREA
MINOR SUBD.
NO.
Raul Figueroa Amethyst Avenue Rancho
Cucamonga 76 -0648
An Instrument of Credit and Agreement form in the amount of
$5,400,00 is being posted for the convenience of the owner and
is for road improvements as shown on the above minor subdivision.
It is therefore requested that the Instrument of Credit and
Agreement be presented to the City Council for acceptance.
JOHN' R. SHONE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
JRS;JPC:SZ;pc
ITIJ6 UO0O Rw 1,„ q�
Por N -E. 114, Sec. 22, TI N., R. 7W , S- 8.8'A8 M
ARCHIRAL D -_ - _- - - - - -- -
N
10
m
N'
OI...., �... ,cn. .,. -
�t�
• � ,t0 �m
AMFTHYST -
IV.
Pa, Cuco M p 1126
Alto Lama 1061 51
Tar Code Area
5228
evENLF
P
H
N
l
f
SIREET
A55e5Soct, Moo Q
Oa ok1061,Poge 51
San OernarJmo Coup,
.r
Pomona First Federal
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
April 21, 1979
CitV Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho, Cucamnnga, CA
Gentlemen:
This will serve as notice and agreement that Pomona First Federal
Savings and Loan Association, a financial institution subject to regulations
by the Federal Government, holds oc deposit the necessary amount of
55,400.00, pledging these funds to the City of Rancho Cucamnnga for payment
of labor and materials on a projrct of Raul Figueroa, known as Plinor
Subdivision Na. 76 -0645, County of San Bernardino, State of Co. 1-if ern in,
according to that agreement dated _ , between City of
Rancho Cucamonga and Owner as stated.
The FIVE TUCUSAND FOUR 111.7:DCED and no /100 ($5,400.00) will be disbursed
upon authorization and direction of r. duly authorized representativ- of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
This agreement shall emire either upon disbursement to th- CITY or
upon acceptance by the CITY of that portion of the aforemer.tioner, work secured
by this instrument.
Very truly yours,
Assistant Vice( President
`:ancger
This aTrernen.t approved:
LM'npi -j
d. CiTTE';:
C i[° Goun c +i, Cit,� r` I's ndx� Lccar nn r:.
:)ate:
ALTA LOMA OFFICE: 9634 RASE LINE POAD AT ARCMIBALD, ALTA LOMA, CA 917,01 '(7141 957-2575
•; A C R E E M F. N T
Plot Plan/Minor Subdivision /Mobilehome Perk
'Phis AGREEMENT. made and entered Into this day of
19_, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO COCAI:CNGi., State
of California, hereinafter called the "' CITY ", and R, \NL FTGCEROA
hereinafter called the, "OWNER".
WITNESSCTN
FIRST: That the OWNER for and in consideration of the permission granted
b•; the CITY, to construct certain improvements within public rights of way in
Chet certain Parcel known as Minor Subdivision No. 76 -0648
hrreby agrees at his (its) own coat and expense, to furnish all required egmip-
menr, labor and material, and before the expiration of two years from the dcte
hereof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner the following
work and improvements, to wit: Construct road improvements on Amethyst
Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Said construction shall include:
340 linear feet of curb and gutter; two driveway approaches: enFineorinr
and staking; all necessary engineering, grading and pavine.
in accordance with the Son Bernardino County Standard Drawings and Specifications,
and do all work incidental thereto. Said Standard Drawings and Specifiettions are
on file in the office of the Actin. City Engineer ' and ate hereby made a
part of this agreement, and said work and improvements shall be dome under the
supervision and to the satisfaction of said Acting C_ty Er..vineer - OWNER
hereby agrees to pay for all inspection of the work as required by the CITY . The
estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of FICL TEOCSA,al Forg
9G \DSED & no /100--------------- - - - - -- Dollars ($ 5.400.00
SECOND: The CITY , the Sc *ing City Enninear- . and all Officers and
employees of the CITY shell not be tecounteble in any manner for any lose of or
damage to the work or any part thereof; for any of the materials or equipment used
or employed in performing the work; for any injury to any person or persons, either
workmen or anyone employed by him; or for any injuriex or damages to person and
property the OWNER or his contractor having control over such work moat properly
guard against.
THIRO: The OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY ., the Accun. .,
City Engineer and all officers and employees of the CITY' from all suits or
actions of every cause, kind, or description brought for, or ae a result of any
injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the
OWNER, his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance o: the
work herein,
l
Jf �
`r.
FOURTH: It is further agreed that the OW13R will •, all times, up to the comple-
tion and acceptance of said work or improvements, gi••r. ;,od c..J adequate warning to
the traveling public of every defective and dangerous %rditiou existent within public
rights of way, and will protect the traveling public from said hersrdoun conditions.
It 1s understood and agreed that until the completion of all required improvements,
the subject road or roads shall not be accepted into the City Mcintained Road System.
OWNER may, with approval of the Acting City Engineer , close all or portions of
any street when deemed necessary to protect the traveling public during the construc-
tion and /or installation of the required improvements.
FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, That the OWNER will furnish
good and sufficient bonds in an amount not less than the estimated cost of said work
and improvements as specified herein for the payteenc end faithful performance of the
terms and conditions of this contract. Said bands tn.ry be in one or more of the follow-
ing forms: '(1) cash deposit, (2) bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sure-
ties, (7) instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to
regulation by the State or Federal government pledging that the funds necessary to meet
the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for pa•,nnent: and agreeing that the funds
designated by the instrument shall become cruet funds for the perposes as set forth
above. Should said securities become insufficient, the (G'NER agrees to provide supple-
mental surety as required within ten days of notificetion. All bonds shall remain in
full force and effect until all work is completed and cccepted by the CITY.
SIXTH: It is further agreed by and between the po�ttes hereto, including the
surety or sureties on the bonds attached to this agreement, that in the event it is
deemed necessary to extend the allowable construction time for the completion of the
work as required under this agreement said extension may be granted or denied by the
City Council and such action shall in no way affect the validity of this agree-
ment or release the surety or sureties on the bonds attached hereto.. In the event of
such extension of time for completion of the work required hereunder, the CITY may
re- estimate the value of Sncompleted work based upon current unit prices and adjust
bond amounts accordingly as required, and in the event that the CITY brings suit
against OWNER for alleged non - compliance with this agreem>-nt and judgment is recovered,
OWNER shall pay all costa incurred by CITY in bringing such suit, including a reason-
able attorney's fee, to be affixed by the court.
ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Clerk of the city of Mayor
Rancho Cucamonga
By
JOHN R.. SHONE
ACTING CIT'i ENGINEER
By Doputy
i
IOigoature of Principal)
(Sipnalure of Principal)
By -
Vendor
Answering Upland
County of San Bernardino
Cucamonga County Water Dist.
Eastman Inc.
General Telephone
I.B.M.
Jack Schenk
John Blaney Associates
L.A. Hayden Disposal svc
Los Angeles Times
Progress Bulletin
Southern Calif. Gas Cc
Sparkletts
State Farm Insurance
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
5/17/78 LIST OF BILLS
Account No_.
Description
Amount
Check No.
01 -51 -28
Answering Svc
$ 20.00
1317
01 -I1 -24
County Codes 8 Supps
171.81
1318
01 -51 -21
Water Service
44.17
1319
01 -11 -24
Office Supplies
4.45
1320
01 -17 -21
Svc 5/1 - 5/31
334.94
1321
01 -11 -28
Typewriter Rental
53.00
01 -17 -28
Copier Rental
300.94
353.94
1322
01 -19 -55
Air Fare
59.50
1323
01 -19 -28
Svcs through 4/30/78
14760.51
1324
01 -51 -21
Svc for April
30.00
1325
01 -11 -24
Subscr. 4/4 - 5/14
6.43
01 -19 -55
Classified Ad
120.00
126.43
1326
01 -11 -24
Subscr. 511 - 5/31
21.60
1327
01 -17 -21
Svc 4/3 - 5/2
18.02
01 -51 -21
Svc 3/22 - 4/20
8.00
26.02
1328
01 -17 -28
Cooler and Bottled water
20.40
1329
01 -19 -61
Fidelity Bond/ City Trea.
400.00
01 -19 -61
Fidelity Bond/ City Clerk
474.00
1330
0
0
Vendor
Sun Telegram
The Daily Report
PREPAYS
Public Employees Ret. Syst.
Bill Larson
Postmaster
Dept of Benefit Pmts
Loretta Dale
Sally Logue
City of Ontario
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
5/17/78 LIST OF BILLS
Account No. Description
01 -11 -24 Subscription
01 -19 -55 Classified Ad
01 -19 -55 Ad /General Plan
01 -19 -55 Ad /General Plan
TOTAL TO BE PAID
05 -70 -28
Contr. Period 4/23/78
Trust -2 -1
Tennis Lessons
01 -26 -24
Stamps
01 -11 -24
Stamps
01 -51 -24
Stamps
01 -19 -12
St. Income Tax
Trust -1-4
Dance lessons
Trust -1-6
Playschool Instruction
01 -19 -64
Health Ins.
01- 19 -64A
Life-Ins.
Total Prepays
Payroll 5/7/78
GRAND TOTAL
Submitted forrr,,��wiAp'cil approval 5/17/78
ar y Emey �ir`ec�f Finance
Amount
$ 33.00
195.60
231.60
460.20
157.48
17065.45
913.06
160.50
24.00
24.00
24.00
72.00
44.20
337.46
445.00
160.00
216.97
16.36
233.33
2365.55
4060.88
23491.88
Check No
1331
1332 •
1246
1288
1289
1296
1297
1298
1299
1316
0
May 3, 1978
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was held at the Community
Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on
Wednesday, May 3, 1978.
The meeting was called to order at 7:25 p.m. by Mayor pro -tem
Charels {Vest.
ROLL CALL Present: Council Members Jon P. Hikels, Michael Palombo, Phillip
D. Schlosser, and Ma)orpro -tem Charles West,
City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman, and Interim City Attorney,
Sam Crowe.
Ab sent: Mayor ,lames C. Frost
APPROVAL 01: The minutes of April 18, 1978 were approved.
MINUTF'S
Mot ion : Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the
minutes of April 19, 1978. Motion unanimously carried.
ANNOUNCEMLNI:S A representative from the Historical Society presented each
Councilman and his family an invitation to their Fiesta to be
held Sunday, May 21.
The formation of a Historical Committee. Anyone interested in
becoming a member of this committee should contact the City Manager
or a Councilman.
Sam Crowe introduced a guest, a woman from West Germany who was
an attorney and specialized in city government.
I:hanges in the agenda:
9B -- will be taken off the Consent Calendar and handled
as a separate item. (Summer "music" Tent).
Additions: Bids for the paving of Vineyard parking lot.
Goneral Plan meeting will be changed from Saturday, May 20, to
Tuesday, May 23, at 7:00 p.m.
Had received petitions from Carnelian and Central Schools about
serious traffic problems. Been sent to the City Engineer for investi-
City Council Minutes
0
_2_
0
May 3, 1978
vestigation. Will be back to the City Council for consideration.
Introduction of James Rrbinson of Chino. Ile will be the new
Assistant to the City Manager starting %lay 15.
Randy Bond introduced David Humphries who recently joined the
staff of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce.
PUBLIC HEARING An ordinance establishing a purchasing System.
Ordinance No. 2.i ORDINANCE NO. 23
(second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF '1'1111 CITY 01' RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DSTARLISIIING A PURCHASING SYSTEM
OF REGULATIONS AND REQUIRI-MI-N'I'S, AND
PROVIDING FOR 'RHE PURCHASE. AND SALE OF
SUPPLIES, F.QUIPIRM AND SERVICE.
The title was read by Mr. Wasserman.
Public Hearing was declared open.
Mr. Wasserman explained the proposed ordinance would establish
a purchasing system, policies, and regulations for the purchase
of supplies, equipment, and service.
Plot ion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to waive the
entire reading. Notion unanimously carried.
Discussion: none
The public hearing was declared closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Pelombo to adopt the
ordinance ostablishing a purchasing system. Motion unanimously
carried.
PURI_IC 111::1RIS(; An ordinance to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program.
Ordinance No. 24 ORDINANCE NO. 24
(first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE 0111 OF RANCHO
IlnNGA, CALIFORNIA, ES "1`01ASHING Ii11G11LATIMS
IN ACCORDANCE 15I'I11 1: [IF: DITAR'DIENf 01; HOOSING
AND ARRAN DE2GLOP%IENT FOR A FLOOE INSURANCE
PROGRAM.
Mr. Wasserman read title of ordinance.
Public hearing was declared open.
0
City Council Minutes -3- May 3, 1978
The purpose of the ordinance was given. it establishes building
regulations for construction within flood hazard areas. It had
been drafted by the U.S. Department of (lousing +nd Urban Develop-
ment and could not be altered. This had to be adopted by the
City Council in order for local residents to be able to obtain
flood insurance.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikeis to waive the
entire reading. Motion unanimously carried.
Discussion: Iterman Rempcl spoke on the importance of adopting
the ordinance. lie emphasized that if one does not have flood
insurance, then it is difficult to obtain federal aid if it
should he needed.
"Shorty" Guerra questioned if one could now build within the flood
area, since he hid been told that insurance would not cover
building within such an area. Mr. Wasserman explained that the
ordinance lists specifics on building within such an area, but
does not prohibit building within a flood area,
public hearing was closed.
The ordinance was oassed on to the May 17 meeting for a second
reading.
(.11.) "IASACF.R'S Law Enforcement Contract was moved to a later time when the
REPORTS Mayor would be present.
Purchase of A request for authorization to purchase furniture and office
furniture S equipment for new city offices.
office equipment
Mr. Wasserman explained that we will he moving into new quarters
with more personnel on duly 1 and need to order now. 'file city
will do this by seeking bids and are confident that it can be
accomplished under the estimated $45,000 amount.
Motion: Moved by Palomho, seconded by Schlosser to grant authorization
j�o' city to purohaso the office furniture and equipment necessary
not to exceed the $45,000 amount.
Mikcls had a question regarding the cost figures which were
answered by Mr. limpet', Director of finance.
(lotion unanimously carried
Additional A request for authorization to hire additional personnel. 'fhe
personnel request was for it secretary for the Community Development Director
at a salary range between $833 to $1017 per month.
City Council Minutes
174
_4-
E
May 3, 1978
West asked if this position were to be a CETA position?
Mr. Wasserman said no.
Palombo asked about the salary range breakdown.
Mr. Wasserman said they were in 5% step increments.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to grant
authorization for city to hire a secretary for the Community
Development Director at a salary range between $833 to $1017
per month.
CBTA report The City of Rancho Cucamonga had received authorization to fill
a number of CD'FA positions. Although the present program will
not be funded after September 1978, it was expected that it
would be continued in a similar form. The positions being
requested were:
TITLE MO. SALARY STATUS
Admin. Sec. $833 Filled
Sten.Cler 71.1 Filled
Maint. Worker (2) 679 Open
Account Clerk 769 Open
Cashier /receptionist 713 Open
'Typist Clerk 663 Open
Drafting Aide 798 Open
Police Cadet (4) 663 Open
Mot _on_ Plored by Palumbo, seconded by klikcls to approve the
filling of the CF:L1 positions. Notion unanimously carried.
Development
Review Board Resolution for the establishment of a Development Review Board.
(Resolution No. RESOLUTION NO. 78 -21
78 -21)
A RESOLUTION OF TIRI CITY COUNCIL 01: TIIF, CITY OF
RANCHO CIICAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, I:STABI.ISMING A
DEVP.LOPMEN'I' REVIEW BOARD.
'I he Board established would review all projects to see whether an
Environmental Impact Report study is required. After the review,
the projects would go to the Planning Commission for approval.
The Board would be looking for such things as zoning violations,
flooding problems, removal of trees, dust control, etc.
0 0
City Council Minutes -5- May 3, 1978
Mikels asked if all decisions of this Board would then come
to the City Council. Wasserman said no, it would then go to
the Planning Commission. Unless it was appealed, it would not
go to the City Council.
Palombo asked why there was not a member of the Council on the
Review Board. Mr. Wasserman explained that this was not usually
done since it was usually an administrative decision. Also,
if there were an appeal, it would come to the City Council.
hit. Crowe explained that this was only a Review Board, and it had
only one function which was to review a project to see if an
r.IR review should be done -- there would be just one decision --
a negative report or an environmental impact report would have
to be done. It is required by law to have this function.
Mr. Wasserman pointed out since the Council seemed concerned
that they would not know what was transpiring, that copies of
all RIRs would be in their mail boxes. If they had further
questions, they could call City Hall.
Mikels expressed he would like to see a Section 0 added that would
contain an appeal procedure. Crowe said it could he provided if
the Council desired. 'rho Council requested it. Mr. Crowe said
lie could do it then, if the Council wished to take a orief recess,
or go onto the next item and then come back to this. The
Council moved on.
Mayor arrives (7:57 p.m. Mayor Frost arrived).
ROiOCtion of
Mr. Shone presented the recommendation
regarding
the rejection of
Bits - widening
bids for widening of Beryl Avenue, north
of 19th
Street. Again,
of Beryl
for the second time there was only one
bid. It
was from Sully -
Pnlombo referred
Miller who was the only bidder. It was
recommended
that this bid
and could
be rejected, and recommended that they
seek bids
one more time.
The County will start Monday morning to
open up
the street for
traffic and repair the damaged section.
Mo t_inn: ?loved I +v Palombo, seconded be West to roiect all hills and
tci ro- advertise for curbs, gutters, and the widening of the street
between Orange and 19th Street. Motion unanimously carried.
Request from
Mr. Shone
again presented the
request.
Ile referred it to Mr.
West Valley 'Trans-
Palombo since
he was a member
of West
Val Icy 'transit Service
it Service
Authority.
Pnlombo referred
it to Mr.
Stulians, who was present
Authority
and could
better present the
program.
Mr. Stulians said the program was slow in starting since it only
serviced people that were handicapped and needed a specially
equipped van.
City Council Minutes
Paving of
Vineyard parking
Lot
Resolution for
Development
Review Board
J
-6-
0
May 3, 1978
He explained that the cost of $37,8no was only 1/6 of the
total cost since there were other communities in the area who
were also part of the program and would be sharing the services.
Discussion followed with the Council members asking questions
about the cost, reimbursement for services, funding, etc.
Although the user pays 25 cents, it does not in any way pay for
cost of the service. funds come from the SR -325 funds. It
was noted that after the costs for transportation, such as
dial -a -ride, fixed route services, etc. were spent, the city could
use monies for road repair. That would probably amount to
approximately $40,000.
Palombo said that as a member of the WVTSA, he felt the services
were fair at a very fair cost. He recommended that we accept
the program.
Motion: Moved by Palombo to accept the request from West Valley
Transit Service Authority in the amount of $37,800 for the
recommended Dial -A -Lift services. Seconded by West. Motion
unanimously carried.
A bid from Sully- Miller for the paving of the Vineyard Parking
lot was $44,886. This was the lowest bid, therefore, it was
recommended that the Council accept this bid. There was no
discussion.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to accept the bid
of $44,886 from Sully - Miller. Motion unanimously carried.
Mr. Crowe had finished drafting Section 6 of the Resolution.
It was read by Mr. Crowe and is as follows:
"'Pile decision of the Development Review Board may
be appealed to the City Council by any interested
parh.. The appeal must he in writing and received by
th0 Cit} Clerk within fourteen days from the date of
such decision. The appeal must indicate the reason
for such appeal and the Council shall hear this
,11)P0111 at its next regular meeting, subject to the
Council's rules for regularly scheduling agenda items."
City Council Minutes
Law Enforce-
ment Contract
0
7-
May 3, 1978
Motion: Moved by Mikels that resolution No. 78 -21 be adopted
with Section VI added with the time stated as fourteen days
from date of decision. Seconded by Palumbo. Motion unanimously
carried.
Since the Mayor had arrived, the Council went back to the Law
Enforcement item on the agenda.
Mr. Wasserman outlined the contract with the cost figures involved.
They were:
Total cost
$1,.194,000
"Personnel
1,091,376
(25 deputies, 5 sergeants,
4 detectives)
Operating Costs
174,609
(helicopter services, 8
marked patrol vehicles, 4
marked detective vehicles)
Office supplies E support
17,000
equipment
Deputy training (27 deputies)
56,Ooo
Building rental F, maint.
20,000
Utilities
24,500
Office furniture , equipment
27,600
*Includes 61,% overhead charge, vacation, sick leave,
retirement. etc.
I'alombo asked Mr. Wasserman his opinion of the contract.
IVnsserman said it was the minimum he would want to recommend to
the Council, hilt it was adequate.
Captain Wickum spoke on the School Resource Office issue. Ile
painted cut that this position had been established primarily
bev1lllse of the loitering, bothering of customers, burglaries, etc.
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. in areas surrounding the high school. Under
the contract this position would be eliminated and other officers
would assume the responsibi lity along with other dirties.
Discussion followed over the importance of the SILO. Palombo
said some hall come to him wanting him to speak to the Council
to have the SRO kept.
IVest felt the position was more important than the helicopter
services.
City Council Minutes -8- May 3, 1978
Because of the Council's concern, it was suggested by Mr.
Wasserman that this be brought before the Council again in
August for review. This way it will give the program a two -
month trial to see how much the officer assigned the "beat" would
be away from the area doing other duties.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the
contract as written with the understanding it be reviewed in
August. Motion unanimously carried.
Consent Calendar Items 96 and 9m were removed from the Consent Calendar and would
be discussed separately. These were: The Summer Music Tent and
tract No. 9588.
Consent Items;
a. The St. Peter and St. Paul Parish Annual Fiesta on June 2 -4.
b. Removed from calendar.
c. Application for on -sale Beer and Wine License, For Pizza
Hut, 6709 Carnelian Avenue.
d. Application for on -sale Beer License. La Officina has
requested a transfer of a beer license.
C. Authorization for Director of Community Services to Attend
Conference in early June in Sacramento. Cost about $200.00.
f. Tract 9588: Accept bonds and execute agreements. Owner:
Alta Loma -10 A Limited Partnership.
g. 'Tract 9035: Accept roads located on the west side of Turner
Avenue south of Arrow Route.
h. 'Tract 9036: Accept roads located on the west side of Turner
Avenuc south of Arrow Route.
i. tract 8935: Accept roads located on the east side of Beryl
Avenue between Banyan Street and State Highway 190.
j. Tract 8973: Release material and labor bond (sewer) in the
.amount of $7,500 and material and labor bond (water) in
the amount of $10,500 to Lewis Homes of California.
1. Release the following cash staking deposits:
(1) 'I'rnct5 9188, 9518, 9519: Lying north of Arrow Rotate
and east of Baker Street, Subdivider: Suncrest Ontario
Company.
0 0
City Council Minutes -9- May 3, 1978
(2) Tract 9313: Lying north of Arrow Route and east of
Baker Street. Subdivider: Socaland Corporation.
(3) Tract 9295: Lying north of Sixth Street and west of
Archibald Avenue. Subdivider: Socaland Corporation.
m. Tract 9588: removed from the Consent Calendar. Discussed
separately.
n. Approval of Bills.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve the
consent calendar. Plation unanimously carried.
Music Tout Mr. Greg ] linrichsen, managing director of the Summer "Music"
Pent and Director of the West End Theater, presented the summer
music program. It was to be a family type affair; would produce
four musicals on a rotation repertory basis. Location would be
cast of the Sycamore Inn on Foothill Boulevard. It would be in
a large circus tent. The concept is very successful in the
East, but few were found in the West.
Mr. Ilinrichsen explained the procedures that had been taken and
requested tentative approval subject to the following conditions;
1. Certificate of Comprehensive Liability Insurance
(bodily injury, including death or property damage) for
Circus Pent insurance carrier of not less than $500,000
covering the dates and location of this event.
2. Certificate of Comprehensive Liability Insurance
(bodily injury including death or property damage) from
insurance carrier of not less then $500,000 covering
the dates and place of event and all activities con-
tained therein.
3. Certificate holding the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
its agent or employees harmless due to any act as a
result of this activity.
4. Written permission from property owner authorizing use
of property for this event.
5. Written agreement with San Bernardino County Sheriff's
Office to provide adequate police protection. (Adequate
protection to be determined by Sheriff's Office and staff).
• •
City Council Minutes -10- May 3, 1978
6. Fvidence of Compliance with County regulation for pro-
vision of restroom facilites: Men - -1 restroom per
each 300 in attenance; Women - -1 restroom per each
275 in attendance.
7. Evidence of Compliance with County Regulations on
parking. Once space per every four persons in
attendance.
8. Evidence of successful "on site" inspection by
Foothill Fire District for compliance with all
applicable Fire Regulations.
it was felt the following should be added:
1. To No. 3 -- naming city as additional insured.
2. lividence of successful "on sire" inspection by City
Building and Safety Depnrtment for compliance with all
applicable building safety regulations.
3. Approval by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's
Department.
Frost asked Crowe if anything had been left out. Mr. Crowe felt
that if there were, it was provided for in items 1 -8.
Aotion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to give tentative
approval to the Summer "Music Tent" Theater subject to the
conditions being met. Motion unanimously carried.
Tract No. 9588 Robert Arcinage spoke stating that Tract No. 9588 should have
been started in February.
hlikels and Palombo felt this should be on the May 17 agenda
after it had been checked to see if it were a part of the Growth
Management plan.
(Rost and West felt they should accept the suggestion of Mr. Shone
and give approval subject to a check of the records to see if
'Tract So. 9598 were part of the growth management plan.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Schlosser to accept final map
on Tract 9SSS (plus bonds and execute agreement) as long as this
was within the time frame it was suppose to be. if not, then
instruct the City Manager not to sign agreement. Motion unanimously
carried.
Mikels suggested in the future that all such information be
included with the agenda materials.
0 0
City Council Minutes -11- May 3, 1978
CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Crowe reported on the Transmission Lines. lie explained
REPORT'S that there would be two lines -- one the preferred which
followed Day Creek, and the alternate which would come through
Rancho Cucamonga.
Although the issue of the alternate route was not up for review,
except as an alternate route, much discussion followed over this
alternative route. The Council was not in favor of this particular
line coming through Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. Crowe said now was
the time to voice their disapproval.
Randy Bond of Southern California Edison, was present to answer
questions.
After much discussion over this alternte line, Palombo brought
the discussion to a close by saying he felt the point had been
made, and the Council should make a recommendation.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to direct the
City Attorney to voice opposition of the City Council to the
development of the alternate transmission line as prepared by
Southern California Edison. Motion unanimously carried.
NEW BUSINESS Mikels felt a tree ordinance should be drafted for saving trees.
Mr. Wasserman felt one could be drafted and brought to the City
Council at its next meeting. Mikels said the Planning Commission
should review it also.
Mr. Crowe felt he could get an ordinance ready for the Planning
Commission meeting on May 12. Mr. Crowe %aid that an ordinance
of this type, however, was very complex and could not be
adopted quickly.
Doug (lone, lid Young, and Sharon Romero all spoke on the issue,
It was pointed out that eucalyptus trees were not the only ones
needing to be saved. Developers were uprooting good trees of
all kinds. It was pointed out by Mr. Young that it would take
;in "expert" to tell if an eucalyptus tree were healthy since
often a healthy tree from outw:;rd appearance would he rotted on
the inside. Also, they are shallow rooted trees, and if not
watered thoroughly, they could become dangerous.
An ordinance will be on the Planning Commission's May 12 agenda.
Task Force meeting on May 11 at 4:30 p.m. in the Alta Loma School
District Offices.
City Council Minutes -12- flay S, 1978
Mr. I;rowe said there was a meeting in San biego on Thursday
and Friday on All 201 and alternate proposals on school issues.
fie would report on the status of All 201 at the next meeting.
Palombo said the next West Valley Transit Service Authority
meeting would be on May 18, the third Wednesday. At the
last meeting, they had discussed the issue on the Council's
agenda for the evening.
Question was raised about an ordinmtce establishing fees for
sewer hookups. Mr. Wasserman said this was handled by the
Cucamonga County Water Pistrict and will bring it back to the
Council if there are fees involved.
Mayor Frost introduced the following;
1. Adopting a resolution for the preservation of
wilderness mountain sheep. This will be on the
May 17 agenda.
2. Community group in the process of preparing a
recommendation regarding two -tier government. Will
be on the May 17 agenda,
3. Preservation of historical sites.
4. A representative from htiwmlda should be on the
Planning Commission. It wits he on the May 17 agenda
for a recommendation that the City Council appoint
a representative from Htiwanda to serve on the Planning
Commission.
S. Chino Basin Water pistrict will be meeting on Thursday,
May 11, in Montclair at 7:S0 P.M.
6, Will be a meeting on Tuesday, May 9, with Kamansky
and Townsend to discuss mutual problems. Will give
a report on this meeting on May 17.
7, l,caders conference in San Diego for new Councilmen
and Mayors put on by the Cnl ifornia League of Cities.
I.leeting will continue through the Sth of May.
Fd Young wanted to know where the city was as far as accepting,
after ,July 1, the road right -a -ways, the raod improvements, etc.
Was the City working toward that eventual end. Mr. Wasserman
explained that after July I the city will be contracting with
City Council Minutes -13- May 3, 1978
the County Road Department for normal street maintenance
which should be taking place in the city. Will probably be
coming to the Council at the next meeting with a proposed
agreement.
Young was concerned about a 50 -foot dead eucalyptus tree in
front of his property which he had been trying to get the
County to remove. So far no one would and he felt it was a
danger to his family.
Also, concerned with a wall problem -- just east of him by a
new suhdivision a wall was going up that ran parallel to
Baseline. There were similar walls going tip throughout
Rancho Cucamonga which were blocking access to road right -
a- ways. Weeds were growing -- it was a blight on the community.
Mr. Wasserman said the Planning Commission was very much concerned
about the wall problem and was trying in an informal way to
resolve the problem. The other problems that Mr. Young had,
if he would refer them to the staff, they would take care of
them.
ADJOURNMENT '['here being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at
10:25 p.m. to the next regular meeting to be held on May 17, 1978.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to adjourn. Motion
unanimously carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
• •
April 25, 1978
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.A
Joint Meeting of Planning Commission and City Council
Special Meeting
CALL TO ORDER The special meeting of the Planning Commission and
City Council was hold at the County Library Conference
Room, 9191 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on
Tuesday, April 25, 1978.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor ,lames C. Frost
and Chairman Herman Rempel [it 7 :08 p.m.
ROLL CALL Present: Jon Mikels, Phillip Schlosser, and FLayor
.tames C. Frost,
Planning Commission Members Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia,
Peter Tolstoy and Chairman Herman Rempel.
City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Interim City Attorney,
Sam Crowe; Pommy Stephens, Planning Department; Marianne
Cordova, Planning Department; and .John Blayney, Planning
Consultant.
Absent: Michael Palombo, Charles West, and Laura Jones.
PURPOSE OF Mayor Frost explained the purpose of meeting was to
MD:'I'INC, review and discuss storm drain facilities and plans.
Dill Mann, representing San Bernardino County Flood
Control provided those in attendance with a brief
overview of the city's storm drain facilities presently
constructed, and those which are planned for construction
in the future. Mr. Mann indicated that the total funds
needed to complete the storm drain facilities is approx-
mately $26.5 million.
Mr. Mann identified several alternatives for completion
of the city's storm drain system:
1. Zone 1 funds through County Flood Control District.
2. Bond Issue - Required approval of voters.
i. Drainage fees paid by developers.
d. Require developers to install portions of storm
drain system through their development.
ADJOURNMENT Flat ion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Garcia to adjourn.
Unanimously carried,
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to
adjourn. unanimously carried.
4
Special Meeting -2- April 25, 1978
The City Council adjourned to Saturday, .April 29, 1978
to a General Plan meeting at Alta Loma High School.
The meeting adjourned at
Respectfully submitted,
Lauren M. Wasserman
0 0
April 19, 1978
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Joint Meeting with City Council and Planning Commission
Special Meeting
CALL To ORDER The special meeting of the City Council and Planning
Commission was held at the Community Services Building,
9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday,
April 19, 1978.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor James C. Frost
at 4:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL Present: Council Members .ton IL Mikels, Michael Palumbo
Charles West, and Mayor James C. Frost,
Planning Commission Members Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia,
Laura .tones, Peter Tolstoy and Chairman Herman Rempel.
City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; and Interim City
Attorney, Sam Crowe; Tommy Stephens, Planning Department;
Marianne Cordova, Planning Department; and .John Blayney,
Planning Consultant.
Absent: Phillip Schlosser
PURPOSE, OF Herman Rempel, Planning Commission Chairman, explained
MUET I NG the purpose of the meeting was to review major issues
which must be considered in the General Plan.
DISCUSSION Blayney: Alternative Population Prejcctions had been
distributed in order to stimulate discussion concerning
:Le future rate of growth for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Ile explained that the City Council and Planning Commission
arc in a position to determine the rate of growth for
the City.
Blayney suggested that the City Council review the list
of kcy issues and options reported at last week's
adjourned City Council meeting.
Rempel: Commented that he was assigned to a subcommittee
to evaluate circulation transportation system. The city
must be concerned with roads located within the city
limits as well as those streets which go through the city,
but link our community with neighboring cities.
0 0
Special Meeting -Z- April 19, 1978
Palombo: City should plan alternative development plan
for area now included within right -of -way of proposed
Foothill Freeway in event the proposed freeway is not
constructed.
Rlayney: Traffic patterns arc key influence on future
development of commercial properties. City must be
concerned with proper planning in order to minimize
traffic congestion at major intersections.
Frost: It appears that the Foothill Freeway may not
he built. Therefore, the city should be very concerned
with landuse.
Doug Hone: Commented that there is still a chance that the
State Legislature or State Transportation Commission will
determine the fate of Foothill Freeway.
Tom Stephens: Suggested that the General Plan have
alternative plan showing no freeway. Also suggested that
all rights -of -way be retained until the issue regarding
the construction of the foothill Freeway is definitely
not going to be completed through Rancho Cucamonga.
Garcia: Proposed that Circulation and Transportation
element include reference to Ontario Airport, type of
design of streets, and future transportation needs.
Garcia also suggested that some limitation on growth be
determined and included in the Gencral Plan.
Rlayney: City has serious problem concerning design of
present streets. Some effort should be made to deal with
design of major arterials.
Rempel: Development of equestrian trails, bikeways, and
jogging trails should he included as a goal of our
General Plan.
Rlayney: Automobiles will continue to have a major role
in transportation for citizens of Rancho Cucamonga.
Oarria: City should consider providing priority to
buses on major arterials.
Garcia: Land use is very important part of General Plan.
Plikcls: Sphere of influence should he subject to control
by city to make certain that future development north
of city limits is compatible with General Plan.
0 0
Special Meeting -3- April 19, 1978
Stephens: City should request county to use city's
General Plan guidelines for unincorporated territory
north of city limits.
Stephens suggested that General Plan take in area
between city limits and national forest boundary.
I'likels: City should apply separate requirements for
hillside development.
Slayney: Retention of hillsides and wind- breaks should
be retained. The city has an opportunity to have
varied development because of the large undeveloped
areas which now exist.
Garcia: all future design standards should be compiled
into a single document, rather than being assembled on a
piecemeal basis.
Mikels: It may be difficult for the city to have a set
of uniform standards to all types of development.
lolstoy: General Plan may provide "guidelines" rather
than specific standards for all developments.
Rlayney: It may be appropriate to have different sets
of development and design standards for each of the three
geographical villages within the City of Rancho Cucamonga
in order to provide diversity in planning standards.
Mikels: City should spell out its basic intent in the
General Plan.
Frost: In regard to community identity, many options
nvailahle need not be included in General Plan.
City identity is being sought, but the separate identity
of the three distrinct areas of city should be preserved
if possible.
Mrs. Jones: Development should not he allowed to "leap-
frog" tln ough the community. Growth patterns should
expand from the corps areas. City needs to foster a
a cultural identity.
Pah I: Growth and land use decisions are critical. Growth
shmild be within industrial areas and into Ctiwanda on
a gradual hosts. Growth west of Haven should be incremental
and orderly, rather than scattered.
City must be able to provide services before growth should
be permitted. Mr. Dahl stated that I.Hwanda development
should not he encouraged until the Cucamonga and Alta
Loma areas reach their peak growths.
0 10
Special Meeting -4- April 19, 1978
Rempe l: City should consider encouraging more individualized
construction by discouraging large projects from being
developed.
Blaynev: Question of phasing is critical. It may be
desirable to encourage development adjacent to some
isolated developments which have already been constructed.
Garcia: Council and Planning Commission should discuss
maximum population which may be desirable for Rancho
Cucamonga. City must be certain that adequate sewage
treatment facilities exist.
Mr. [lone: Commented that some effort should be devoted to
preservation of water in the Cucamonga water basin.
Blayney: Sewage treatment issue may be beyond control of
city. Council and Planning Commission may wish to phase
growth in accordance with available sewage capacity. City
must assume that sewage capacity problem will eventually
be worked out. Clustered developments in proper areas
may be a good alternative to resolve sewage problems since
those developments may be cowered by "package plants" or
septic tanks.
.Joe llelrio: Growth should be concentrated in areas
nearest to transportation facilities.
Stephens: Open space areas should be preserved by
reserving park and open space areas for future. City
should also he concerned with preservation of areas
which are already within flood plain areas. All vacant
land should not he used up on 's acre residential
dove l opment s. It may be hest, for example, to encourage
smaller lot development with open space areas in immediate
vicinity.
RRCISSS Hnyor Frost called for a recess at 5:45 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 6:10 p.m. All members were
prosent.
Garcia: Commented -- regarding the industrial- commercial
development in the future hotels and other commerial
development should be segregated from industrial areas
of the city. Those in attendance concurred with Mr.
Garcia's viewpoint.
0 0
Special Meeting -8- April 19, 1978
Frost: Noted that if the Foothill Freeway is ultimately
completed, it may be appropriate for city to encourage
some construction of hotels and motels in adjacent areas.
Garcia: Designation of alternative sites for location
of a future regional shopping center shouli'. be related
to future growth and should not be detrimental to existing
commerical developments.
Garcia noted that the city is in an excellent position to
attract an auto center.
Dahl: Major shopping center should be visible from freeway
Joe Dilrio: Whatever locations identified for shopping
must also be acceptable to the Shopping Center industry.
Stephens: Eastern boundary of city should be viewed as a
"window" to the city when development occurs. City will
be pressured in next year or two to approve development
in eastern portion of city adjacent to Devote Freeway.
City should be extremely cautious and should be very
selective about the types of development which may occur.
Ililrio: City should make an intensive effort to market
its industrial development potential through adoption of
its General Plan.
hlayney: Discussed agenda for Saturdny meeting at Alta
Loma Nigh School on April 29, 1978.
ADJOURNMENT !lotion for adjournment: Moved by West, seconded by
Palombo to adjourn. Unanimously carried. Meeting of
the City Council was adjourned at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor
Frost. Chairman Rempel adjourned the Planning Commission
meeting to Tuesday, ,April 25, at 7:00 p.m. in the County
I.ibrary Conference Room to discuss the Flood Control
needs of the community.
Respectfullyy submitted,
((//Lauren F1, Wasserman