The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992/03/18 - Agenda Packet CITY COUNCIL AGE NDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. March 18, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 nr City Gouncilmembere Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Cowcilmember Diane Williams, Counrilmember Pamela J. Wright, Cosncilmember ~~~ Jack Lam, City Maiwger James L. Markman, Ciey Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City OfSce: 989.1861 PAGE City Council Agenda '-`+Gl-J March 18, 1992 1 All Stems submitted for the City Council Ageeda vast be is writing. Tae deadline for submitting these itemc is 5:00 p.m. oa the Nedaesday print to the meeting. The Citp Clerk's Office receives ell such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, and Wzight B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONE 1. Presentation of Aaeet Forfeiture Funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the San Bernardino County Sherif f'e Department. 0. COlD(ONICATIONS PRON TAE PVBLIC This im the Lima and place for the genersl public to ^ddres• tan City Council. Stets 1^w pros iD its the City Council from addre^eing say issue not previously includetl oa the Agead^. The City Cmuncil may receive teetivony end sot the utter for s subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minute per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Tha following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routinm end non-controversial. TAey will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may bm rsmoved by ^ Couneilmember or member of Lae audience for di^eu^sioa. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 2/26/92, 3/4/92 and 1 3/11/92; and Payroll ending 2/27/92 for the total amount of $2,550,137.71. 2. Approval to receive and file current Irrveatment Schedule 1$ as of February 29, 1992. 3. Approval to destroy records and documents which aze no 19 longer required ae provided under Government Code Section 34090, PAGE City Council Agenda March 38, 1992 2 ~ RESOLUTION NO. 92-059 PO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AVTHORZZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH AAE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PAOVIDRD UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 4. Approval of supplemental funtling request by SCS 32 Engineers -- Consultant for Ae 939 for an amount not to exceed 58,240.00, io be paid out of the County of San eernardino'a Trust Fund Subject No. 020, Fund 545. 5. Approval to transfer funds from the 1989/1990 Roberti - 42 Z•Berg'- Harris Grant in the amount of 534,470.00 to the Basketball Hardcourt Aetro£it Project. 6. Approval of request by Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of 43 Commerce to waive City feae in conjuncelon with the annual easiness 6 Community Hxpo. 7. Approval of a Resolution of Approval for Snvlronmsntal 45 Assessment and Conditional Uae Permit 91-20 - Shell OL1 - A request to establish a qna seat ion, mini-market, end car wash on a 1.31 acre parcel in the medium reeident ial designation (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) of the Terza Vista Plannetl Community, located at the southwest corner of Aaee Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-153- 17. RESOLUTION NO. 92-06G 45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-20, A REQVEST TO ESTABLISH A GAS STATION, MINI- MARKET~ ANO CAR WASH ON A 1.31 ACRB PARCEL IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACHE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWHST CORNER OF EASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MA%I NG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-17 ^ PAG E ~ LJ ~ i/~~ y~y ~ y.\..~~ City Council Agenda ( ~ ~~` II { } t ~-r+i. March 18, 1992 {,~ II ~ 3 8. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 6q Improvement and Dedication between Jorge and Rosa Orozco and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for sitlewalk and wheelchair ramp improvements, located along the eastern and northeastern portion of the Orozco parcel for the Sierra MadYe Avenue-Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey St Yeet Alley Project. RESOLUTION NO. 92-OE1 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION PROM JORCE AND AOSA OROZCO AND AVTHOAIEING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 9. Approval to execute a new Agreement for Installation of 66 Public Improvement and Ae-Dedication of Righi-of-Way between Cary L. Youell and the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga for street improvements located along Lhe north portion of the Youell parcel for ChB Ninete¢nth Street Project from Carnelian street Lo Amethyst street. RESOLUTION NO. 92-Ofi2 6) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A NEW AGREEMENT FOA INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND RE-DEOlCATION FROM CARP L. YOVELL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE 10. Approval of transfer of the cable televie ion franchise, 68 now held by Dickinson California-A[izona Asaoclatee, Ltd. (dba OCA Cablevieion) to Che Marks Group. I1. Approval to rescind agreement for Rlght-of-Way )2 Acquieit ian between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and The William Lyon Company approved on Marsh 4, 1992. RESOLUTION NO. 92-OS3 ]pq A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIAr RESCINDING AGREEMENT FOA RIGHT-OP-WAY ACQUISITION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA AND THE WYLLIAM LYON COMPANY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 4, 1992 PAGE City Council Agenda March 18, 1992 4 ~ 32. Approval to execute Contractual Agreement (CO 92-015) ]3 between Oldt imers Foundation and the City to provide senior nutrition services. Agreement permits non- exclusive daily use of a portion of the Raneiio Cucamonga Neighbozhood Center for senior citizen meal service and distribution. 13. Approval to execute contract (CO 91-037) with t.Ie County 83 of Ban Bernardino for Fiscal Year 1990/91 for Library Service Enhancements for the branch facility at 9191 Base Line Road, to be footled from Account No. 01-4632- 6028-4200. 14. Approval to execute contract (CO 92-016) with the County 8] of San Bernardino for Piscal Year 1991/92 and 1992/93 for Librazy Service Enhancements for the branch facility at 9191 ease Line Aoadr to De funded from Account No. 01-4532-6028-4200. Ib. Approval to execute Contact Changa Order No. 2 (CO 89- 9"y 001) for the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quaid and Douglas, Incorporated for Interstate 35 and Foothill Boulevard Interchange Hodification, Account No. 13-50200 for design changee and additional design in the amount of $64,900.00. 16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 92 Tract 12462 - Detention Basin located cn the south aide of Summit Avenue between East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by First Family Homes. RESOLUTION N0. 92-064 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANU IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 12462 - DETENTION BASIN 17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 95 Tract 13351, located on the southwest corns[ of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 92-065 J] A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF. CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALSFOANIAr APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGAEF.MENT E%='ENSIGN AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13331 PAGE City Council Agenda Harch 1B, 1992 5 ~ 18. Approval to ratify Lire Notice of Completion for the 98 Heritage Park Bal lfield Lighting Improvement Project, CO 91-060, Marina Construction. 19. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 9Q Notice of Completion far Tract 12873, located on the east aide of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Banyan street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $560,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 56,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92-Ofifi l~~ A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALT FORN IA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAC^a 12873 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THfi WORK 20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and ]Q1 Notice of Completion for Tract 13565-2 Streets, located on the northeast earner of Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (street) $253,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) $ 25,300.00 AESOLVTION NO. 92-067 IQZ A RESOLUTZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS r^OR TRACT 13565-2 STREETS ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and ]Q3 Notice of Completion for CUP E9 -26, to catetl On the northwest corner of Beryl Streee and 19th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (street) $ 5,600.00 PAGE City Council Agenda March 18, 1992 6 RESOLUTION NO. 92-068 1~4 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCfiPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEHENTS FOR CUP 89-26 AND AUTHORIZING THB PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA THE WOAR 22. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Band far 1t15 Parcel Map 9350 - Ellena Park, located at the northeast cornet of Re nyon Way and Belvino Street. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) $ 11,630.00 B. CONSENT OR INANCB Tha following ordivaacas have Lad public hesrtags et the tiu of first raadivg. Saeoad readings are expected to ba routine and aov-controversial. Thep pill be acted upon Lp the Council at one live wLLLOUL disoussiov. Tde Citp Clerk will rud tie title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Iiema Submitted. P ADVERTISED PVQI.IC AEARINOS The following items have peen advertised and/or posted ss public Learivgs es required by law. TLe Clair will open tie eeetivg to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO 2MPLVMENT CITY-WIO CUA H9I0 RE 10f PROGRAM - City Council will coneideY the Environmental Management Commie eion's recommendai ion to implement Ciey-Wide Curbside Recycling Program. 2. CONSIDERATION OF FNVIRONM GTA ASSE 9MENT ANO CE .+.Zk 161 PLAN AMENDMENT 92-U1 - CITY OF ANCXO~ - A proposal to amend Figure III-7, Master Plan of Trails, regarding certain trail locations. PAGE City Council Agenda March SB, 1992 7 ~ 1)4 RESOLUT ZON N0. 92-069 A RESOLDTZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN MAETER PLAN OF TRAILS (FIGURE III-7) REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, AND MAKI"`0 FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CO 5 0 RAT ON OF ENV RO T 5 SS N 0 V 161 AREA SPECIFIC PLAN D T 92 0 T O N HO cUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure II-7, and Fiqures IV-1 through IV-19, regarding certain trail locations. ORDINANCE NO. 488 (first reading) 178 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CSTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-03, AMENDING FIGURE II-7, AND FIGURES IV-1 THROUGH IV-19, REGARDING CERATIN TAAZL ROUTES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPOAT THEREOF CONS TION OF ENVI ON ENT AES ES MENT N I NDA 161 S EC IC LAN ENDMENT 9 -0 CITY OF CHO C ON A - A proposal to amend Figure 5-18 and Piguree 8-20 through 5-40 regarding certain trail locations antl to amend Article 5.33.200 regarding Community Traile. ORDINANCE NO. 489 (ficat reading) 2l)~ AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPO[U7IA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01, AMENDING FIGURE 5-18, AND FIGURES E- 20 THROUGH 5-40, REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES AND AMENDING ARTICLE 5.33.200 REGARDING COMMUNITX TRAILS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 3. CON82DERAT ION OF APPEAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ZSJ AME DMENT 89-03 - U.S. HOMES CORPORATION - Appeel of the Planning Commission's decie ion recommending denial of a request Lo emend certain development etendarde within the Etlwanda Spec if lc Plan as described below: ^ PAG E y ~y ~y ~At{'y~i~ ~~y\yJ ~ ~' City Council Agenda March 18, 1992 I~ y' {+ I, u y , ~ ~-~'l.~-~ 8 ,~ 1) To allow single fam.i iy detached red ident ial development within the Medium Residential District (e-14 dwelling units per acre) utilizing Basic Development Standards; and 2) To reduce Che minimum average lot size from 10,000 square Eeet to 8,900 square feet within the Low Medium Residential Diatri ct (4'8 dwelling units per acre) under Bas is Development Standards; and 3) TO reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) under Basic Development Standards. 235 RESOLUTION N0. 92-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDHENT 89-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPOAT THEREOF CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVEOF AN APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TACT Z1J 14931 - V 5. HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a proposed tentative tract map and design review for the development of 226 aingle family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the Etiwanda specific Plan in the Medium and Low Medium Residential Districts (8-14 and 4-8 dwelling unite per acre, respectively), Located on the east aide of Etiwanda Avenue south of the Devore Freeway and west of East Avenue - APN: 227-231-01, 09, 12, 16, and 32, 227-191-15, 227-181-24, and 227-2fi1-11. Related file: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89-03. RESOLUTION NO. 92-071 23S A RESOLUTION OF THE C3TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14211, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 83.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE MEDIVM AND LOW MEDIVM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8-34 ANC 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PF.R ACRE, PAGE City council Agenda March 18r 1992 9 '--`J4+-I ~ ~7/{ ~ ~ RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEFT OF EAST AVENVE, AND MAXING FINDINGS IN EUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 231-01, 09, 12, 16, AND 32; 22?-191-16; 227-181-24, AND 227-261-11 242 REEOLUTION NO. 92-072 A RESOLCTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE DESIGN REVIEW OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14211, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LANG WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE MEDIUM AND LOW MEDIVM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8-14 AND 4-8 DWELLING 'JN ITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OP ETIWANDA AVENUE, BOOTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPOAT THEREOF - APN: 227- 231-01, 09, 12, 16, AND 32; 227-791-18; 227-181-2dj AND 227-261-17 G. PVBLIC REARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requiremenia. The Cheir will open the meeting to receive public testimony. ZM16 1. CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC IG -O WA O AAX RI F EXIS NG E TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE - Public hearing of proteate regartling eminent domain action to acquire public right-of-way for Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue at the property commonly known by Aaeesaora Parcel Number 127-011-13 (a vacant lot) for the construction of street improvements across the south property lion of said property. (Continued from Me rch 4, 1992) RESOLUTION NO. 92-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC ZL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PVBLZC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF PAGE City Council Agenda Reich 18, 1992 10 ~ 2. CONS DEAR ON OF I T DOMAIN A ON U PV IC AIG T OF W O LARK DANE FROM IT•S E STING A8 Y TE N TOR CHESTER AVE U AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNE HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE - Public heeling of protests regarding eminent domain action to acquire public right-of-way for Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue and the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue at the property located at 11881 Highland Avenue (APN 227-011-09) for the construction of street improvements across the south property line of ea id property. (COaiiaued frov March 4, 1992) RESOLVTION NO. 92-074 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGAr CALI£OPNIAr DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED .4ND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN TXE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAEINO FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THfiREOP H CITY WAIIAOER'S STAPP RBPORT9 Tbs following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Cheir may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSID RAT O OF PROPOSE AMENDMENTS AGE A 24] OAO INANCE NVMBEA 485 2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO COMMUAITY 249 PACILIT IES DISTRICT 91-1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-075 251 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITX COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPORNIAr DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A "HELLO-AOOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982" SPECIAL TAX, BOND AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT ELECTION oADINANCE NO. 490 (firer reading) 254 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP MNCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, AUTH0R22INC THE LEVY OP A SPECIAL TAX IN A COMNVNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PAGE City Council Agenda March 18, 1992 11 r AESOLVTION NO. 92-076 y~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF TP8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PRELIMINARY ISSUANCE OF BONDS OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT I. COUNCIL BVSINESR The following hems have been requested by the Citp Council for discussion. Thep era not public hearing ite.s, slthovgh !ha Chair msy open the stealing for public input. 1. DISCUSSION OP THE I ND DIVISION OF THE QJJ CALIFORNIA CITIES' BOUNDAkIP J. IDENTI PIGTION OF I S FOR NEZT MBATIf~Q This i• tho tins for Citp Couaeil to idealifp the itss thsp wish !o diacua• +t the a+xt m+mtiaq. Th+se ik+ma will sot be discutaed +t thi• maetiag, only identified for wm aaxt mestiag. K COMMUNIGTIGB PRON TBE P This is the time +ad place for the general public Lo eddreet the City Council. state lew prohibits the City Council from +ddreasing sap issue ao! pr+vioualy included oa the Aq+ad+. Th+ City Council may receive tsatimooy sad amt !hm utt+r for + subsequent meetiaq. comments aYe to be limited t0 tiv+ minutes per iadividuel. 1. REOVEST BY THE BARNAKIAN COMPANY TO DS WIA RY 2$Z HILL PROJECT I L.L. ADJO~UgNWEN~T + I, Debra J, Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, herehy certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda wee posted on March 13, 1992, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government code 54953 at Y0500 civic Center Drive. y V V iNw VY~I YN O_t_O V <O~ YYY OM- J n W LL u i MOwOwNONOONINPaNOwOi000i O.I000 NOwNON04NOnONhNYpe000Ne00M0 < newiei•~ n~iwii•i /ien~e e~neo~wry P ANON NPw NINN•nNNMO10P N•/NOONM ~ 1 . • ....Nw NNNN OOOONnOwO oao•O •eonewNh•n aNwh~ OO wI nOlO~f wv ww h win n n n aHNinawehrwoNNnaNah•woNNnln•hrw•wNlw•Yeww•w al•{we Nn r{wNNNNNNev«««««• ahNYNNNnYI-r.Y YYOYYrYY«~wwww&Fi~R/°n O: wnnNNNNNNNNN (•NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNN NNMN •VIIIVI•Ialaall e'11•a••Va111VIa11111111111aaV11V1a oaaaaeeaaaaaeeeaeeaaaa•e•a•f aaaeaif afaeaaaa•aaeaaeoa 1 I• •Yf YY v a IY 1• • • u nv« w w ~.~ • Jo• ~ s R N nn oew \ Y \ YY N Ja •N r N\ \\ •NN N W N ViN •M nW wN Yeh w • »N NN •Pw S•Ie N O NN Y J ^a Ni- NN Vaw'IY a NYOW- w \\ N i w\YJ1e • \f0 L `N N : mNYVNO ~ N NO MOY V MY •-i-O N N V {Wi J Y 'J- -V-Y NNVnV W YYYN•. aN LPVOhVMY YyN ~100V ~ Y YY VaV - J ry- ONN efM N- iNN YLLV VOYC YVyV - 1 ZJ-\L NJMVY- N-L VV: fNV iYYYJ V_ Y -- M - n0~1 OVMN{ H • Y s W WY - •Z J J MYJ-1`N Y J J i~NJY O OYif i \\ Y t~ -ffY\IY YJiVYOYf Oat • J LO -~>WOi .'! Z y N =-N yN Y JNO YiY tL ~ 4V a VOi WN `Ji w-Vp9 LY i i iMi iYrYSY I 00 V N ZJMYNYy J-Jy M-i Ny p yhM ^VV{Yi VV Y.Y •1 9<-M -i• J JO -Y i N•• ~ fi u ONN N JLN iNN--Y-IeM -La Yf-O/•f YfJWY V VJY INWf V Oe N •PMYI VO•'li iNWY N`hVp •/r if M- Ji N tLWO YW iNVYM JYOY NY[ 1 h~YhJN JNeaY ~ VY YY W 9Jf0 Y-J YO NY{JeMMYiLJ V{•.i-Y YLMy {JIJY-Na ii i NJJYO iN~-Jfl-fJJiY 33-• iVM9JLYrh i~••WZy pJMMf JO:ryO:J WW f M_wiWyp{h{YOiONf h~~OWhh-~OihwfJ YO~Y iY-YYWVV OYWnYiHu 00 VJYNNYYrMZYJ i0•Yi-V{O V ~;N ^t-a V~>iYiiY =0 M ~NJ N'JVN VJO_fN Y MYiYOJLNY Jh •NY ON/HVNYiN • : FffYw„001 YM O-YYLNLf NMLiY-Ya {OOf iONfl OOW yruD N{i o wh wewr awNLW Woisf eo. a_YWYY_e .. - U W O0{ NJJOL •NNYO{ VYY-i~j^Y NiNOh Y- JMr O WW J•YJNa •Y \JW~••`iiY J~1 WOYVYO 0YYi0 W w VYwVN>fw00->V•IINN-•iYVT-V>YJN Yi{fy N{YPYZV~~Y i h M Y J i 1 N VO i i NJ~ f i Y V Y NfY N YppL f Y i i p ONY N~ 1Y ~ N 1- NON i h ifJ = >• O J i N• N ~N< YN M •w•[[i uyi~~11 Y - O pOMO O bi hii w •\iM V MM Yn M Y Yif ~ Y i • •f.~pe iY J VYJY J J J [ hY { WW i <N iNYY N • OY 0 yN • Y W N NY a :~ih 3 rNJr:w Y h NJY~ V i «i~ y O M •9 if {V WN • • OW ii OYOYOJNhi NO VY iYNi~ NfWO Yi Vh=W WJ Yw •iYVOZYi ~OhYM nW > i h iVaZNiYhV NW a =:0 sW0-f ~~iiy~1YM1 ^ ••11NOM •y Y OWVLNYa Z+ Y NOW p O -Y~iN OV EppJh YZS N VfNNOLY~w •. N Y NLWw •Yi •[0[YO WYWwO ZJMOY- Nf Y Y 1fhN - YN ~YJ• ItV• MiNf 00Y0-M YM ••i1I0_NONYOh •J10 Ji h 11~•/• • 1 Z_V tZ Y ~~i'•-N•fiY Yi~y~~~S~O{ wLNiiYY~ YVO N iii{e .O N•Vi Y NNN WN - OOOtY •Nf• NY Y Fhw O p0000i Wf0 ih W MY JY4p WYVY `1-Y N WL h M [ihi00 •N Y < Y Wi~OYJVJMY{ ~yy~S{MYYV Y~~MNe ~~~MN y•9f WfYNnOYN NY ~ t••YO~YV~~%{V:~I~Y iYVYYYYYYYVY YYYVY YYV0000000 n1 N Nh+nnh••wwY{ww{NN••NnewnlnaaY enwh• N•aaeNNwwo in r f {nNwnaNwnllnaNwf{ea•w•NYa1 we•rh rvoNNlenn• n •N{ NewrwNn ynwrwaanwwwN rya arw• weneYw •f• N N nnM• N.4 n N n•r • N •O• •NnN.• I ~ / i V O N iNw Ohl e:N VfN €.° iWe ~00 ONa YJ Y V Ni Y• is V• ii i . i y o OrvmNOwnOOMNhOHP000NwO00Nf owwNONOlmOnO0lTNww+OT00 NONOONnT<ONO<pNYTaNONpfOON<NNOwONOPN+NINwNNMNNO T_N• PT O+a~ MfNm1~TwNealhNNmhNnma0a0awlNN~Iif~alw m~ ww w wtiNT whN OwnV mP n w + n N w wN JaNaVM fC ywyO wNTIM+NVwryO J~NVTaNaNYw Or.Nnf wlal«IwONyNnfw+N+<wOwNn• Ymn Ar N In wl~nTwl lml it llT TnNTTnwN1 IN11NI T1i1T TInw nAnwT1 w1 ~1A AI~wIXAXXXXXTMnml~l wl >a<IlaJafllaafallffffffaaa<IIVIIIVIIVVIIaa1f VIV<aaV• onafa+a+n+na++++++++a++a+++a+aaaa+al++aaaaa+aev+ana+ f •Y O • .< Y < OY W N a S ww Y w i w \w TNN\NN Y N Nn \ YMWNO• N wlnww J !N \ ~ Mw \ w OwNfN wi n\\N\\ < \Y N ww t wm wS \\aN \e inT\•n iu u N° w wi f \~ ry • n Y:inNw_ n• NNWN Ysp ~« \ \ «N«N nN aN \efM:\NM \O Inl w\INY .N Li N ~N nTNr\Y1 w \W JhNary NlLaaaNNYV NV • Ln < MYM \w 1nJi M Na O•i Y fiM WYONY iy VNfa~N OWNNaY N iW\• WnWVJ i Wi Na wy •a 19 Y V •YlaaO\\W 1 VNMW V<J iLYY9 N as • Y YJ<M YM aYN'~W Nil n IYa iNV Vfa 1 of Nr11~\~ ~ ff IWwYIi H P _ sa: Yn ii rl 1iJ JJbyNW a inLS w\ • W a F M yO'OIIIMNNIY~MW Yy~OVNVYi •M NiY VthY _MN\Nywy ~iOWY+yyf~1 1yy0 iafw YI<OaiVU NYNJSlf~~ rim w~•a wnJJ IN~JwiN~Y9 ~WY •INwWw•JNY Ji i~otra.: w.ai'aiY:WHS iY Zli uuw~:r tnY ii11~n1uFiYi°iaail ilau~ <Y NNWOWwOMiYYMM OYah YN wi1NN NOOYMMNOOOINh'J NiWN ONhDiW YW iNV\ih i' i00 i 7N Y IViN yiiani iOi<Yi iFNWItOiLYON Ni FLii VI'IVMI. O WO• aMaf N WW1fY fGWO y VVJ M NYi DO•\ Y VVJ Ni0. OY i YWWL l iYJ a01 Y\MYJJ YYY•fY YJiiN> OIyYJ pY,/N JiOy JJNIOJ JWa00YY MOY YO~ YNiOYY10OhDa<iWMhYCV(ep OwiiYb VO IJN OVONNN MyyhjtO h YYyy yM OOY 9NIi O OFOYOhN<OOhNNO VDNU~~~YW9JaIJJVMJfi<fY9YOf<\NMaYNVVV~VhYNhW~VfV •Y WJYY_NVNOM VYIiNVONiJ•OOiYNMViiYN NNNMhYN'JNMhM N<NIN ~MM 'IWOYwNYLO JJf S~~ ayjh~aLWNJ<~~iJa JO NY y<y<JJ Y1iy N<O<YLFifhV ~' hl~N~hNYNwN~Nw+~S~NaNL~-M•~MNEaY0~0•MLF~~LVN~f~~Nh~ W W •ii W Y ~ hY i< My • FVh VN h O N ~ aN~ J1 1 MN V i ie ii N1.0 N J Y VwY W< J YW lppaY w f D~N1 ~hh Y Y" G •i O Y X ~f iN NYJM JY N _ __ JM U Y Y Yifw iYJ Yi N NN W wNJN~ii n 'F OYJJ J OiSV: ~: ~::/. L W:J uNYNafY iiffViY • <+YN• o fe0i J iY Mr y iYVMNJJ <NNNiN+i •W ~Y1 OJMy LiN wV ONwM iyy ie ip •tiY~a#9::W.:Y9'YOY<OOp ~ViYrt~Jah~M1f OJM~WV ~JJ N.w Nf p• iV;••iF~jjiLrYJJ<i0000Nf y{V\t~iYWwir_++•VJVOO W~WtVi`la ~i NOhOJ •~Y wi • •MJ wY •a~f NO •iMOfOYiir i~Yi Mliil OO NIViI Wt •Yn0<i~iLYWf<-yNfi WW•~•N~~~OI hiOhlYOiiW < VS •hV• YiNSHVYpp11OYVNNn y((LY iOiiY~ppl1 ~~~jj111111Y IpNpt NN IN MM y wY OMWIJW NNJVf;OJWW1<~Y~I~Y~~i~ffNM,Y0Y0YJwMY •i liOtfOW•iVhV IfJNNfWWNJOOffNVh9W<VVWWYO'Jw iiii O~iiYWwJiii « tWYO WWWWWaaaaaaVVYYYYViiiiiiii ihMMYM11 11Y YiVVVVJJJJJJ TO+aNmVaNY0f+101•NNOONNIwNVNNtNNNw+NhNwNOwHwVnON mJN NNNNnNNOVfNwfWwOnNNNNTnNONawff+NhNVNVVNPmwNMwamlmWO NN.Nin Oi wmlf it ITN~ImIw yNNN•+1 nw~NYwfM ww A~IjMNMI1TwNN ~wImH.NinN a OOOOOOOOnO00NhNNYOnnprOONOOwwNO1N1Y w00000w i~ w0000pwO0000000wwwhnlNOONnONONhMnwMNnN 000000• <• \• PNOOP P.IN•wOf•~OOrwNll~•NIwnPNnVnwNnNwinwO01a..0 V wMO1N10aYPanwnaaNOrannNn VnNMOOa NN r w nw w Jwww N n +f Nh « 1 N w N wNw ~/ •Z• wr Y Y I 7• • A •O • r ONNnINahNIOwNnlNihrwO N N nl JNOMrwOM N A 1V la h w w O h r w ONpnVF _ • a .•••• ~•• .••.. ~•• , . . iia • ~• ~ • ~~ f w h « nnATn h n r ~~~~~~ w A w n pn~~ R ~~ ~ •~~ • ~~~~V~ • ° I 1• 1 l l l l • l lln n l w l 11.11.I N>IT 1 ln ll >IIIVIIaa111r11111r1111111.1111aa11a11V11aa11 n 111111• vi eaaaaaaaraaa aaaaa of afaoaaf+++ff+aaaaaaao<aaaa +aaaaaa iii > o f LL Y f 1 • • z N N r r i i u w ~N N n r w n r N« t N i \ w w w • a h iN • ~\ n \ i\ • • u ~ a ~we. iF ~ NN M • a ~tlW s v • • N wW i i Y NN \ Y n nnw N •.. \ ry \o < > Q W JN w ~rofYu V • • \ NN LN nw a h aVJf YS • N WN N N• i! 2= V YWN •WYY hY \1•JhW < Y iV M i00wJY iNw • • L •-\ •YLw \ N• • NN•+(- l i f ~ V ORPpT! <hl • • •N i Lw NL w 9NYV ii O M A V»~^ V(N !N • : • Olwl \Y YiYh• VN fh JJ i 1 11 >\I I i JJYMpiJJ 1 J\Y nLwNYYLO •< N J•f W w: O wl V 1 • : O :s=YhYfO n Y<IOLNL -NY+ fM YN OfN i __ O W iN D<O • • aM1N J NNM \ Y \hi\IILif YL •i f YhV ` >1. ~ VY N f YNy3 FNY>02YVi 1• !NL N f Of ~ ~ w `LLI J <fMjV VZ •Z• r>Mj i ~N Y V h ijl riN 00 +NYLO 1 h -I~IW-YJjN •O iYY0YN0 •L• V O P` LO OM ~: • NhN VVJjNfLY i Jl f•VNJN Yil• +IYYVNO(Y wM\ f (YO Yi0 NOYNYwVf+YJM I- YN N fN YJOIN pNL My i •>: WiN OOMYMh hYMV Y Yi1 Yr{iJ YN W •iOiJYY Np ff M f aM1 fYOMLjNii•lNJ •O J LMW • • • YV iY i ij hN < l YwOOMjYOY VJ-Y -Wf Y iIYJYD•MOVN<WOOYfti JWJ NY<VWW ON• J i : • OJjwiiLf YYO( ~ YOJV OaIi+ML M1YLhiY•rMl DMNVV-i0 VYYYY V CJM1Y NIL YNii iMY M<• „Y+>iVJ Sh0<YO Y: •N iD0 00 =n Nf < Nw„iOYMM +OONIOhVMrW VYSY y (•:Z L •O• iih>Y Y O\riw i YYNNYOYWJM Y>hirV~ SVWiff ..Y ~alYV1~I SYSf• h MLW<9N f<NN >YV i OYYO r~N00 JfJ . y 1CY Y(i J Y f • J •fIN i WOWV a Y i i Jw 1/ J J > O hYj w iiNW _ _ ~J .J `` wII . J ~ j j J ~J w Y •= OYYOYWw~«pi9tl~f i°~SB~83wwfYOi NYY3 .:5 hWINY\O M• u: Y~• Y.I••<•YaN~1V~)f i~NftY>MfNY-NN~NJ-L/YlM LLf J00.. • • ~ ~ • M % ~ • t i h b O Y • I Yf N L • ~ j• MW N Y J • • i i J i of r < D si i i s uu ni ~ > ur z ap oa • • • • O J Yi hi • I i N f f 0 a • Y Y N f O YY V ••. S S O •O1 D J J •. i MY Y( F 2 rj Y OCI. . . 9(f V > ti i<YO O i>NJ• OJY (J V >'rNW YJ O i4YNN ~ ~ s JJ~ yy aa {{ S S j ` Vi./O ••~ iif YQN >r>1RYV3.~•9~~JOV~YVtlV•1~r1•~ inOD00 • • Ytl SJJi <YLwNV- •Yf JON>(O+ YNNIIJVY9 9L fYVVVV • • J • JJ i• Ii Vflj iJWOO Y'• YIMf9wMJ Y OI i • • V wf ~1y V O +ji00s •VYfV `` yylOp IY O iN hjiNiiNY ~> JMM/JJ~i Y ~~OiiM NM JM~Y •s `1j .N •fi • • inoitl(• Y VOO \`\Mi •YYiNNM • l•OJNMO> NWYWWWO • • MWNLOO Y Ni0 wYNMNN p NN YYIiiO-jb~1N 20{iOF E Y S S YrIYY •W• aVY Y Yw~YYYYYh YIGOVOYWYY JW • _ N OJNYY > 'J i V ir r ~ f~ •\• :2; lf+yyWYVwww000 YYYY y(Y YVWS2NO Y Y Y OfN00• j((iti;((I((i(ii((llllil00-LLLLLLLLLYIYf tYN ffffrff NNMNNNN • • Y• • NwNwnhhONwOONwNPNwNNOYwnwONNNMNwNNaNNwOaON1 •ww000w •O• •O• aaNlhwOwMINNNhIN h_I. N_NlwnNhaYONrlwlfw'IIOwhO1N ww nhnlhNwnwr NININNwYwOwwOwww OwNNwN nOrOww1. NNNn VO •I• ry y~ w N NNNN wNNw NNN Nn.INNONNJ NN N N NN ry NN Nn •Y• •>• • 3 r .. t ~/ V o N iNP Vf i~ ~J iN Vil S10 i-O f0~ i 1•• s LNW pNs J u \• •• •~• O• i• •Y Y O > 'o YO Op N°.1•°en°O~ nOe°NOe i°ni°enw•pOw°o°o°ow«i <.wie ae°\e°ei°w +r•er wewi~w•:or.iw wee•ie riwlnr ~~ne~ee mNO=~ 1•a•wi•^NI• «~NNa•rrYNNN•m^„ iVw• •YN MNN N N N w POwN N•10••MNIry1Mf0^wNNINOY\NOJ_NN1N p[:+:Iw;:+:~~yy ~~yy ~~yy NNNNNNN 1 •1•I~r•1••~1~~1111•••f I~S ~. 000110001f INV<Vf1\VVO\f lffff••fflr'\11 Y _ Yf \f 1\ \` • \ •Y \ 2 N N V YNJ J V N { •• •YO f ••J JfY 1 OW ~ O ii OY W YJ OOV 000 ; Y hL NyF J MO iWY V OVJ i O fN MiJ ~ 7r OLY V iOf O Y JO JY Yf 9 VY YNYI N•Nt~MV \ M \ VO \MY N Ot Niw00 OpY •L Y Y W M7iNMLY! •• IOJVO OOYNL Y L N •pFp • JJyy JY VYLNNN NYMrO i O Y \ wd~~~JO•i t JJOO OJYYJ V h' 1 O YY YOfJLW OEJWYNJ 9YiJ J JYJJ\ f OJ'JJ OffNf Nw• VO OMNOY MMfONO OVJYYYYNV PJwrOYONO ~\L«1 NNO iNrIrNN If •YO J OM~-~Vw~ IN11O iNW ~M~ IaaVi1VM1•VI\fJJ iYYYyWVNWw4•J•~• pYLM=VNNO •YMVN ViV aYLLNOif N~iOiMff YOW tf_NN NfF •i WOW OYOONOVN•YIM OM w0 N NO Y Vi YONViyYYNN iiif OM FOi •NiV YYYY>Vi0\ Y'JY wJ WVVYLYYNN NMWiM~WYf YVLVVNYFOY0 i1niYV yM~f NOViM1~ VOi9YLViJViYV JMOFJIf lV~yN•~1y 100NNiYYy1 MYMO GYfYCNVONO YY NC VN -Y•LV~M\YirY F f i iM Y J' S .. VN i NLN V ri JYY M YMM Oi LYN N Vv MYY Y i > JY• y i Y iJ IOY .l Mi Y - oe fYai a •a 1N• N i Y~N i O fJf~ ~ Ci NNO JOY U~ Y• Y fYY MY Y Y fYN Ny Yn0 f iii ~Mt~ WH OON MiN YYYI iw V NOO OYYi NJ YtY NyY _iYJi Yi _ JJNM NNiiYYYYNOM fYw M NJ lYMYYWw f~Yf w\ Li f ss YNY p O .9 iNYYY Yi.L MIOYWiM J•iiM~Oi: V~i~Yfff OV01 -N OY YYLN Y-L YY JOi OVY WYy iNM LL i N YY YY NOY• pi NSSr •Y•V1Y JJ JJ>~N~I1Y~1OMN~'~i~~111Y yyY yyYf\Y i-Y •NfV. iiMiffYlY~ eYV yyyONyOYY~OO~~:~il eLe ilMYNNyJ~>WL NMNNMNNN/OI YIM NN YN NfM»>Y~F~J-~>ii1iMMNN NFNYhOYM NOiYMYONYNf••IN IIOf O••Y h1n O N•YNONIMw NNMhNNNl1Y INNN••NNYINMNOYNPO YO'ry /INN ±wNNN\i~NNiNNN•NOI••NNONNN wNN /1N NNNP N NNNIIMNN NN r N f v paM0 S3~ '•OO M0 ON- J Y M L V o O •~ O O 000000000000000 N O 000000N000NON00 O O h_ • •NIOON•NNVNOMOO N N • NN•NMI••MON•NNMN • N >Oh000N0000h0000N0NOOhOON Nhl0001000•N0•ON•00010 :• NNN~NMNOY~lrNN~NOlSNPNNN~ NOIN P: N 0P ~ .~• N ON •M N O• n n n A n .\ iwwn.wnwnwnwnwwwww^w1wNl1wwwlwOwwn Y~wS~O~•~SZSSSS~r111S•S~SS~~SSSS•~SS~1~1~~1 :wS•I~S iNNN•••1•1•••11101111110111111••I•11•1•••11••••I•1•1 001W000WNOYOYYIOOVY000 W'000000f O0YYYVOOWY•W•Y0Y•YY•OW V 1 1 IOIWI 000 • 1 O Y W W Y• N Y Y iONJ • N P O NiM W VQOVS N •I N \ • OhS O O NNO NWN10 •• NN \ L{M O N NVN Y N WNYNO• •• Nw i N M i PiN J1Nn V IIY••1{O O 0 \\ O ~NNS Nf0 M• M NO • Y { NN Y 1 O{ h\ •Y h 7 W Y 1 N {• JM 'JNf { < h Y • • M\ YN VM YJV P YY !O Y OVSViVYV V W N M ``YY` V MYY {MiMY = Y{ iViVNVYV VJY L •~~f\i`!V ii hYYOiY VNVVVYV VfN NY {iY NFO\V Y N i iFWi !1 iN I~ N t YY N Y N Mi0 X100 y 0=M9w \L Jf L LN1 N iFY NS W N \ h ~ t Y NN `\` JLLi\OV• Y {Ji 001 •N~•J Y~J.1 MY yhNMy10W N • • N OwSYNY 30Yf lC$• Ci1Y'NJJOCi NdiY b'1_ iYNSiOC V F _ O S J ~NOO OhfOO~Mj YJOYMSLfYMM SItN MiSO S JJ uah N PY a h-\ f . h No • N~ F L i• M f N•f YY)JOY V iLfLf•sf IYLM WYL O „ O Y NNfN {f OV O~ M^i0 YY`OYNOiJhhPYhWhM O P Y • YVN ;Y •h {~Y~N •I { Oi {hJ fOYNYNi{iJJO O 9 Y YNIYYi {O { s YMO Y NNhJP O{-N Y•J• Y L O •~ J W„ `•l O OLY``• YLY JJ ••11LMpplLh ~./I•111Llf i•Nf Y W N FMY IY•L IOYY MN O~YMY• SapO`~WOZ• Y ^ = Y ffN •PV YNLY YiM'YO{MiW1iYi Yi O N i Y Yf {•1 fl Y LY Oy iLhN{ihONY VNWiN Y M i_ i __ •YOY• {NMN Y i{f•{VNY{ f•N9•IPi9JYiWY\i i { iY• fNYi il•„Y •hN•MN JY i-Y Yi OYMwVNNY O i h hMON`O {LYY f MY •fYNNWLY{YiN9MNNhiNY f` P pJ Ni`yy hp~J~J{LL Y OYLf Oi~``p1 ppi~YM JNJ L~•IIi i• L N~`J~J s p Y Y > ~~1 Ni~~ShSYY f~ Y~ti00LNiiYMOSM~tM-f~MS~SJ W9 V• •: N~Z •1 \• Ow \~S •Y O•a Y• i~ O• :i o• •• •O_ •W ;0 Ii O F M { V O i rhi •! ~ « y VS Si M MM i V~ •O F O hh M 9 ~h N V yN yN y h O~ i W• ~ N J •~ Yi00 {j Y •Y ON 1 Y YC NU NY M •y fYM Yp NM VN O y OU CN! I~Y G j Mht ~Il:: i~• : iY»Z M Y iNM i y W NOOf Y Y OM MNZM i D•> YwYi Y •OyYYM Y_Y_ YMi YY L• M V f ZYYY • FY yO0 YM ^y•!M ~j/ 9• F Y N Y M S{NNi •LY •>Y~0 S S.fOOYOS OSJW J 0 JJ •O iOi{JYN J ZO i Ni JOFJNN•iYY V f p Y Y~1 fMY000Y•~j •• { `` yy11i Nff Y•YtOYM•N ~s O ~ i Oi OYOJL>N NY0 LMwl~y SOJJ 0Yf •YS Jt i O W Y O MY JiMO•„f 9{ YfN^ MOLL OONOOihOOYYiOW 4 Y M N .1N •Jiyi W• iN YY1OyM YY~1IM ZYN4YL N,OY NSO 1 L F i = ii \r1iSJ>JSOO> VS-YLOCSCS S11W wLNS wS YiYi w Yy ~N1 O • Yi OYfiYj Y• Y~JJp ai~~~Ol111 ~ip{i YYV NVV MyyLY O~II .O•11N h t~Y111 J N • Y M f JwNihW~YLFO~~~~ fJwl'SY~YYW-N•O~IhMji-Y~f M~~Y J J Y M N N N NNffSYN1•fY•OJN f•f OS~ff if Off10Y000• i ^ • P wl 0 OOFNNIlN01N••N! NNOOOONONNFO••ONIMPOONfM00 O 0 O N N001w!•OIhNNNONN h0 h0001hNNN001NN0100 N0 w n N n N MNO•NFN•O •NOSN NY YNH•NO NN•00IIw ~•Ni ~Nllw N! Y S W ~ J E 9 V• ~h •i O~Y \~i T~< W• F• O• -~ n\TT1wwNTOT lOOwOwOhNNh«wrOh •nNehONn~wNO~INNNh\T TONNN OV•TYTIN\rhhw^iN • NT •N: NN w N •nNOn000010000000NnwhlwnO00M00 naNesor•whrew•r~Yw«wwehweoe~wo ewin°nlN+iniin.N..Nii nn el•-~wnewnwwiwnM N w0 n wN NOn :N •ww• Nw h Ny • Nw w NN JOwNn•NVhOwOwNnINONf!\MNnON'IN\wOwNN•NOh\wOwNn•NYPOwO W SSSSSSSSSSRRRRRRRIRRRwS4RC2RwwwwwegwLtRStil!"+trSAgRRIw~^IQwR~~^1^IR >........•........•....•...•..•.••vv...•.....•.•...• oaaa•a•<1•a••••+« anal•r•rar••r•+a••av•a•1+«aa••<rr -Mw YS~ Y~O g4° •'O hi Ow• J Y Y M Y L M Y \ ~r I• \• OV \L V \ Y•Y • N • M Y O N ~ n 1 MNN • • N A MO ONI O N N Jw O n ! • • O• \ e\: N n• Y ~ =M N • N• \w s O\ \ • O\ Y \wy ! • NN n• 1 F• • ~ •F < • \ O OV Nw Yo „Y ~ru ~ YNY r +w \ w> \ w iY N w Yi N> NV N NN „ \ wN wIL = !i Y 0O SOiV YS Y jYS LN N\V n {FN ~ YV YI Y V\w i V f YS •• O~F V ` i L ! T Y Y V \ 9 O Y i iY \ n OMN II YN O• ~M NG 1 MN - NO VN LYOYJ NO\ NI NiJ JN \ JYY 1.1 Y ii J N J NL 1 Y J \ O VY NW •< Y N Vh ~Y Yi y O i! J l V• iMYYYYjVYNi M 10 VynNVNFYy h Y y ~1w YNn Y JYNMyy1 y1 Ji ONYTLNw1YiS N :SOYY3 N g S OYYM~OYJ LiYY S9 u1 Li00f>\Y i JY -J<O Y OYNf fYYYJ<iYLiL1lO 7Mi. Yn :9.NY__ .L ON .GY Y. •N.j p.Yi:«NNY p: WN •LY\EiV-Y~ YN E OYL VY•\i•YIM9 YV> YL1LM i Y ONn FYi L1• iYF YNOOYL NYO FiM NFFFr NOOY Li iO`N jiY=Li1LNOi VJ \MO w MNNjYY iii-SJi Y iN „ NMYYJON OL L -VF V YY N YfwNO W YrNNf\- FN 1 fiyyyy NM O ii p LLFi y~1Yif yy yFf `n i> Y $YVJYii$hS$h 9S ScrY i Y .•\VJ$S~~/ i iSYN3 r $ O>MY~<Ii1 OtYOLM9\ML NLNiY MiYOM Of tf NJiY00t SNi ii fYi LV IONtY NL ii> MYL\i•YYVY LFMVL „ iOfYYYMJYSN O•nOi1 YGF< NYY<00<J OY JJYhYY1_wYY JOL•YhMNyN--OL OfL YYLYLLYOM•jjYYYiFWYY«Vi N: h<iiYii<NNMM~JLY90FYLY 9fNY• VYLii99MNY ifNMyN•YM YYI •YwLY •Oi SS~JSs Y ee((L iLNY yiLr ~~••11f 0MMff <rL •f • <yyy~~i \LMYY+Y+ fJJ •J-iO~SSSSLYJiS~L<SS lNESNYi\JhOirM~~~~J>fNNEhO~w`~ ~ ~ 8 S N O ~ ESL Y i yF YY1NY ~ Y i0 N ~ F«f N S .. : ~ ~! Y"3 ~ O O~ Y - J!i • Y Y Y1I YYYS rs JJ i to JyY <YVi A{ S w~Y10NySYC JrSJJY NYS O YYYrMihiN VYO01'JMi 11 y1N7MYYhYYYYLiY• ~L N.i .N.i rlJ~i~$rii ir\.i ~i Y~~Y LAY yy11 Y Yip`p`i{yy{ y1y++Y •== ~~~OVrJJ\SSFGiiiO~~Y ASS\YVYYYYYVVVYYYYYV O M i J t w N Y ~ ~ i~ ! ~ < Y ~ Y N M Dpi Y p! * O iy SNyN Y !N ME M j S 'J iYY~~YM Y 00 0i - EY =JMiYr~ji h rYSSuui1 S OiNS y f rww ,! i Y iNN •i~ i YYOYFI YJyO iYOr Y •r1i YNY Os YYh1Y yMy i1YiY MMOLNNY YSJS •Y~ • R~\SSESrSr~~YfYOVESi fYJNYF FY<OiN -fYwFiiwryiNMWNLYN 1w/ yY~ yiYi Nyi JY if i { yy iYiitSS NL'Y iMYI ~S<LYrMNi>J •Y O• YY Y•>yyO<!! NO i0-YJO>JILN sih s~Sri:~u 31~3~s~~'li~:~oesii.ira~ 9 f1•YWYMwOONi Ye<N O YOOOOOOOOOOWYYLLLL•iILL-LYOYYL wOT\VNhNeNN•rNww•N•N NN•fhyyOhwNwTNwNwYT\IYYONNwNPYn ^N•h\NT•NO\h•OhhNNhi YN\Y••~OfhYOhONNNYOw10wwO•w OlNww IOr'I:YNT OITi1• NNrO N'10• NN+Tj w•N<•INMN~MNwN NA+IAN•H Y ~ C .; : . .. :. N. .. .. V• \• wwMaNOwMYNOwOaY•O rONNwrseOwwrO100nInOOnOONeewMrN•MON •/• N/i• P<NINrNIwnONO~nwIrrlNONwOrrw•ONONwMOrN000000NOr 0••O+ < •VheNP1.1•~eO11~riNrrsiaYrwN N•~<NI•NNOIY•wwn<N~ONwHhM1•~YM \• • NNOIr•PwNF+ MI<1•.N N•ONw IrNPM nO.NIPIN.w+Ow N O N•• ~wNwN V .1I N n 1. ••N M •M •IINO O•Y• \• N + N O N N n M N•a• N N 2• n• W• t • • O• • SJ • I L Y•O • N rw O N N r w N NIN 01.OwrNNn•N+MOw J NnlN+nrIONNNIw O NNI O P O N O ~ _ ~ ~ f , •, •1 ~1 ~ • y ~ a •• ~f ~I ~ « / • YXXXV+•XXXXXwnww/N•N11•wwwN•1XX•1.1.1•IM••Y••1M~M T••IwwwwMwXX~XXN NII•N •Y• >VIVIItIt+1« t+1111tV••111<•t1111 •tt11<1+••t11•!1111 •r• o1•f•11••+a«<f<r<•+a<frrf•••«vvf rar<ff<ff++rr•1++< ii • r i i w r r rr rr Y w ww r + Y • S y V r NJ r N ~ N O \ •• • • a0 MO+ i • h wL N •IN \ w N YNO 01 O O J F O N • N • N F M r • • • • N O •~•+ ±Nw N w ON J 1 ir N r 7 r n Nw0 N 7 n rr V • y ^ wf \YNr n • •wnwN fw • + < ~ ww •• • S •NYtI -e- J • + nY N • • • • Yh !N O N O M OFOO O Ow : i O•= r •J Yyrrrn = N •_~ Nw • • +i iY • • a J• O + >Y hN O- S1 1 ' • ~ • VV Y YY ONYOLL MVW - 99 pfN hJ Y - IVwN•• M 1 Y MMXONM T NMNNI -rY h9 _ ' • • II < \Oie I h 71 JJ„ YJ JJ rW h JNI + J NN -1 S • • yJ•IwN~ N N wi Nr M NMY 'Jfi ry tIL i Y M wYtN •Y • W Y+ YrN N J - rY Y aN9 Y • r p n 0 • ••~~ .•11 y1_ 1 .•11 •~ uy y NNW Ys 3 inwNVN rY. N- N Y< h iX ~ • ~ ~ i 'i ij ~N 'J XM < Y 9 J AJwN YF~ i0 N J i -• W• LN ii i~~ e A NO O r r + • • L OL i1rL a -wJ <O •OYYM ON fN- rr..iYrMOl ~ \ 0 O O ~ 33 I n y I y•M h ~ . i • • YYX OOOiMONOOM\MYr'JYO i+2h\• iiM M OM13 M h hN :~• _ _ OrY<nM9 N MNiM + -+ NfN~ + r0 ONh 9V YN NN Y- Y-N OMYhYYNi\ ffMY ONaN M \JNOMY lMW OY- • •r• MNr N r J --w-iyy Y rJJfYOi Miyyi +yyf iY0 OtYOnYO -NOWYi~X0~~9tlJr N.X~~r~JYiYWiJM+YJ ~~~ JJMOwr. X>! J r iM• 1 1 rMNOrtiaMi<OpV Or iiYM i< i V+it iinM -Yr01 ~ r~YX ~ Ow •+Y •`O i YYi.YIYNy 1O hYhNN Y.f Y • •Y• O Y J i D 1 h V1 ~ •• • Y • • -Y Y• •H1 i wNN VVWI •1OJ hiOOi-fN+f O 1V--N`•J-F--YM-YXh Y •+• TMJrf-NNYJY+YO rY•fwiYiN rr+9Y9rFr rriMJO i+rirN • • h ~J Y ii~lJO i-rN1YwrM a-1J/~11 /~~J••Y YiYYf ~•••a Y••~~ yyM-~Jppp~+ M sY •1M000-MYr-M r ~ ~ N ~ ~ i• •> . . iwti~i~l•ai ~EiY~i>SfONwNS1i00S~Y1• StV Y• -rXE• i/hMOX ~ »Jq+ • • t 6 ~ .+'. i i . i i r i Y y ° ~ i i ]1 i.~ r ~ S rs N > r Y •v ++ rr r ~ YI Y J Y J ~ 1+ Y S YN V+ O • ~Y M N DO i w M •• • •r W i Y YYY p Y + 9 9 V Y • y ` • Y M Y ~M~ < `7 N yM SN • < M f S S S : rYNi Y N •O iNMJirW Ow + Y ••jMM r n NriO ffOOJ Y < O Yi • • •. + • •W O +M Y O y 1ON• iM- Oy04 y • • X Y h p ~ Eaay : i y YN~ •y OY a i YNXN NY NiiN t L • • : J hNi + 9L~ Y iNrlhy J NNfsY Wf O• NiY Nh Y • • ~ S aaisr<f +i+u YJw ...Y. Jf i$ JV fYNM Jf serf O u S ~ . h1.` fYh•1 N My+ Jr h MrNYYy\ ~ C NN +MO O r JJVii N Nli• X Y••W N MY3YJYY.N»N1-~ OYiEYrJtJny ~ J J IJ ~•+ •Y-V~MWW Y Y O Y+N • Y ~ O Ni ~XXX ~ • S S •1 J • YfWYY- J • NO N 9 9 J. i y+yO f+`il>Y`• :~:+- O r X• /h~E E~JJJVYY'JX! J YrYJY Y•i'1 •+•N ~J J iJ i r 'J ! Y l tit 33 yy •11 JJ~~ •~•• yA /•• 331 / S T l YVi~ Y~t fx FM Y a E ~O f ~ Eh JM ~~~~ ~ MME Y Yr - ffFi`Y • p NPi Y J F OYY+ 1 aa yy yy p y y CC f i •+• yy IJJJJJJJItiil~tisi+fii^: :R=CCCC C::L.: iSiNYM1•1rrV. e ' r N1NINNINwrINwNw•.NNrNN1.NwrwNN++nNnrnNr+sYNNrwNwN+N11. •r• Nw•IwywwwwNwrw•wl•we+wrl.wwwN~wNirrNtNrwawrr•+wwnNwNw • • •i• M^• M•N~» NOrN^ +=w~• •FN •Mh<wrnNY<OYr+ M NOrN1• •• SN+ X N• +•w ~iN= +• n1+M+ Nry SNMNN •Y• •>• • • ~ O r u y N; _O 1 B3° LO OM `NW OJL - N L Y .. i 9 •• i~ oo•oaaNeoeo•NweN-an«osoooe•sNNfsa•a Na oe n°i°Nna~+wNNw±oNeehwaesoo~NwonN«•weoo••~•oNeh••eaNw•N iNNwerniwo i_Hrio woril~w ~«neeln>ieeew~iw w.i~lwolnw eiilniwiri« Jf OMw•h MNNNNhPNINNNwOINwwONwVPNOON«wN=MFwwM1F«wa aNOIYON P N•N NN NVaONJw NwN HOO H V NHN H N Na N O nNfNaYYw•NNN<N'I NIwONNNfNaP•w•NNNaNaM•w•wMNrNaN•wOwN ".w1:FS.lS:3S3S2SSSSSS9939770~i30'i"1'i'J9:'J'J9R77C7"1^+~R222 :.....af rffflaaa•a•ra<aaarof v<•roaaaaaraarr<aafa<aa caaaa.a.o.vo..f.a•aafar.raaaraaa..a..aaaoaa<oooaa... Y L Y W w - •YWYi N e L O LL i a~ N ~ ~ rw i w i •Y Yi wN \\ iN N \ • O M •O WYti NY N~IwVS wNN yN Yw iN n Iwil ~O i S L O i VY wNwY \INrOZ ` 1 h O r h i J9 Of \O.1 YM\w11 - w IY L N L iJ N MY MNNwYIY\ \ a P V wL MY -r Ni •syO NIINS`N S • Y « J P1 - .NY N 1 N-YM JiNw TI ~ 1 O N N NO < OF Ni aNN 10 O Yiw! YYw w M{ O M OIIY Y N NO< OI •Y `iNNw i V w ~tY O NO L N at Y Y3sSNw ~O\Mf> \ .~ ONMi N Ma.9 NN. L i f JYOhYwON CCCCCC YMw IiJY J10 • ONYf V J Y YMaO J-LY>wMN Nf 1 YYN J• O->J 1 YINV =iN =YiN-~ <OONiw}YNYN~YN \ JwS • NN w JYM OY M ni YJ ~ N NZ1 r OfVY >1N fEM V~1 lIS _N.IOE Y~Y~YSEw iR wN +YiY wZi<WM J J raL• - VifNMNiYJ LN NLN NieeNissf snriNiN N sL LN iY i09iiY N iV j Oi.O. 1i VNO NO <IYf -YSNN SYwLf NaM YLNi YNa-O iY1NS YYiOMOi 1SJ YYYYJYIJ NNNOwYLS MiYiiYM fN••NJllew Y ifYFN00 N< rY 90NViiJYNOYYNL VIYLMY - YYNw• JF•J Y LYYa•wi• N i0 ii-iVN'JLYi Y 1 i<MM Y 9aNif Y•Y~ NOi\i. OYw O YJY ~~11i.M y JL~1Y YPNYOL YY NYi•il M <OiL •V NM• N O.O OZfJM~~ • O O SN Y YVYiY<Oa•NYIYN •Y O M w<OS i OYJ S i N~ YOMOif .>YYiYihf NNN -<Yw=i i LWO•iONN iiaV• MNN MVOs-Zwii~1OV -M YNSwNIt OLI wY iW0«VI f0 <OY OINN iNJMYYYY •fZNLY iLN >NSf M •fY iMNOOi F NL NNYJOhNLOMJNi ML i0Y0 •OOwf YLi MN•rLf NWMaY W iY-V-itYYMwYL >L>Y•OiYiMJF NNNAY IYM:tii J--NO WYN MY<YYYN N f i rYaY1JMf Y-FY Y Y MM-JwMhYy~JNM fOJ i LS SM Y~J `p J``NZr~~ YNiNYYYNNN00>~ ~~11 wwYYNY NfY FNNf •iL~V~M<~>. MMaY`iNiShLhLJMNaaaNf MN~Til~ii<OOJOYZNLii ' i Y o ie OW •YN i .1 Y~ O<jSMyjS f L ,J/~ tIWO` . N OY Y YN >O ey i JY Yj YM fj0j1..L $e SiJ iSY}-~i:~YiiNYO V YMJiYOYMNWYNY VyHY~Y1 FY M ~YMON iyLy11~>S~OLOYNLY ~NYYii~~<~YaV'Ji iY iiN-/f .00 WS`VYiOSWif~S NLfY`OOOO fIh<Ff~~wNYWY~YJ-wpYYYY 1Ly-NONO-YSOOL.YiJNiiSi i JNYNY • NNMNf< WY s 4W1p~ WiYOYi~p1JNNYNHM - O-WWYY }~LY~ICiiM~O->sO~~a~~iYiL LLLL~LLOYYf efWYYMNNNNNN Y r i i N ~ e • L N J V Y V Y N MM i Y 1 f~ N J Y .«: s fNNo ~~Y C f~ Y ONi YfII <NryY Y.= S3Se:.G `si NYYNJNMNN+N+->Mi ONY ~OOO.J.-iiS iOY yNYYWYiO N O SYNLJwNMYMSJESYY YL.M JJJJJYfff LIN iLYSSYVVUV~Y~Ji~ IVNNi AOOOOLNifY MNMMNNNNNNNNNN-- 3F Y« M Mi •~ Y •i J Y00 NYY p L>Y L M N 101 Y 1F/ i «Z 1.1ri iY NY Mi C Vii ie ifH 1N pL LwY! if VN-dYS NM> YfNlYYi 7iN NMFVM JL NN~ Yi00Li •• lyy~1O ~Wi<YWY ~a1Y NrFYMM O fNMNNJMYMN iiYi iLN.OW FMFFniaa>iii NwNwNONaaNNai«wNNVNOONOwaNNF Nl~NlN-•<•NJMNMwaNMwN•ww MANNN•aM a~fllwNNNwNN••VNNTNw~NNNN •IHi1NNh.NNNwNN<N<NININP N a NNNNNNN r~ NwN JN N NJMN N N w g ~s si i N•t wia ~. oii ~•/ n•o e•i •• ei ai /• •e t` i. is N P r W Y w N iNw f 1 Yi1 ate/ VNI /n ~;O iL0 r00 `Fs LNW OML J `o M L Y O H L / u YI Oi iii YI :.i 1!1 1/1 •~1 i i VI ~ •>; wwoWr/N w eonno n ii~n~oi w w avow r+ n w n ZEStSi sooooor /oYrorr Y LN\~ V y wM • Y i W N J Y Vww ~ ~ YNN O WM wON F L/ww~ i JN wie i rNO+NN~ ~t~\~~ OwV/t N L~VO10 VrOii~ V/LYM ZOOJ•`[N V VNLp i^ O~/iML `JOYwMY L• nNN YrNNMt Y f N L ~ • J O 40 • YY i ~sii M N ifN `~ fN ::YO1J ~oii •V Yis~ie eir:ye/ MNL/b` J/J/YV iiiNwM TN~wnN nww ••.~ NN Nnn Nn N 9 V• L • 1 1 a Off000N OaOfONP000NOOPOfOiTOwNP 1 a O ONNaTOONOOFfVNwPOTN1YaNOOfNONT000ffNfNP L• m N h NNfNfTaOmnPfPNNM.O NmOf mOephwh•POO~mM1NhOT N mNNh wfa NOfVfhaNwONNNaPOf aNP•NPN A w N imn mHN •~ w w N Nff apfM1 aN wN \• N f OP n a h N n A Z • /~ A A N N A N A ~ • N {11 L i a { • JONTNm POa Np PN T•NaPpwO•INm•NahOwOHNTf NOhPPOwNmINarOPOw •2 T rl'-~~eo OwN nNf N •~ Eo NNhhhhhrrh0 pOOePP ~unoaaua~~~~~~{a ~~$aaanaaaaaaa°aa°a pa °a aaaaae HOf •ff ff ff ffVaflfff•ff•ffffffff afffiff•fflffVVV1f is ouaaaa aaa aa aa eoaaeaaaaaaaaeaafavaeaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaafa V ~ 1 1 I L 1 I f •d L f • a L i f i i i • • u e L N w e N : w W y h T N N rf N wa i0 Ow w i\ P <!C V\ i f m W O\ % \ • • a w O a fhf Oa0 yf Y0 w0 r10N0 w f NO P 'J Of LO i MIwN WNwaO fl Tf I Y 1• L OW LVMF 1• LW\\W a• d W v • y \ wdN Vr HL dff ~ LMmml• 'IMW rw iMN J Wf 2 O ) VOV dV VTV VIV WV CV NVp2> f MiyMYP NL _W _WJ _R _ lhL ZVP'J' H >i Fi MpZW YL Y F + iNP • VVV VOV LV NV _ WLid L i9LLi 2 WC •ie hl VZn •• w O O Y O IV YLOVVOJ aWJ N N MO NO 6 NWSZM S WOmY J•N i d` M V ~<w • SI J wW< VWf WJLIVYYOP CENN VN J Upl • i u d „M i1t4 r OWSO•~NRW N NN 2 it V N iuJriVm VLSWdL •~WOYU Oz0 L I J N H < „ i 11~~•• i•{s y yPMOJ NJJpQ RMNVN Wy /~iiYUOO ~~R~JV rf {~LfMi W eWJ ZL i~ •i• i J i NWMJMVLC VdNf1MdLN2f iLN Rf Jp L N 0 •O) i J O J FiO \rfJwN WiNh JwryYO PZM i p S{ •ZLOO YLZWNNJL O WWOVO LO~NW jwrY. 0 •f• V t p p I+Y rJyZOMY iJ OLLtJHdMiJVO OZNZM1J F20 F6 O ~ Zfp6NJ> iWNf6dL\J(OS HSJN Oi J46Y0 POOOZ{ LMJNJfwrYw Vi iy Ow4 ) l N \ Y4SPO<i0<RJyLLN OOJ ffL OUJfOV Vf W W ~ N) N y LLxOCWnwdCF rVL1yr2YLLZWpY WdMrOWx2 {{L fZOWWW Oi >OONJWM1YON OJL i NO Zi LL O i L fYNH4WW<VNy{V• wrZZWL FSJ\{NYrfUJ NVVNU'J J1'{V\Z<MwyJNI•JOJCf V ) i O 2 MOVIL<Mf LHV2NFJ ONE NpUfOiTN6NMNU{W NV66 ~ i x Y rHNf x pfussNYrJL •NJOriHUhY dO2rNpW jF V 4 M p ` • ~ Y?>dd 6iWiiff9Li L NZ OR40WlNfZ dw LJW ~ fO>WfJW YWOwO> PWww• O>WY{JOO J•JW H W LL F i YWdL{Y6WpN>ZL<NUtOrLd NVZOOOxL>YNLF>WO V _ • N UZ M N V V O d f N i c u a i r O d w w W d ~ y M J VYZU i NU Z{HS i NW O N ~ Z \ K N y VZfMV rW• VYp J Z6 W O • V ZWN R SJ>• 7N SMY • YO 1 r • • W6i• WSM Jd Ny r W i o r N4V hN 1•• O i > wrfJ{dP uw{L iw ~iN sNw P U J J J LZVf (W2 JCIZ JW6 Z NOd WOZJyOWFPOFH i{ _ ZV VPJN 2 I i J U VOJNw M<VJpLLahfJ iiL Vi>d ~r TZRNM >pT~WM Jw W P{ iiV2JW F FpJ9 J I h U MO{f iJNNLWM1F •f UZCOWHf OfLf HPH irfO V • J N VOYO{OrW JJW Wrih~l NIOW{ F LLy ~ • • • F d i N O OOW iW W Ri Yt •idROf LYi •J LY • UWiF 70Nt {UU •Z NN W Yf ••Odu dN06pJN• WN • • Y O U W r U OOZ JaV2L YI'INNV •N d 4022 •f LRN6i • ~ S O U ~ WO 4 f OOJMWYWNWNdN02 N <pJ0< V w•W J H / •x1 y • H N Z d f I 'WO < JYJJd•J OSRdZJMNYOWrhVRrJ N pHZRd L wJV YNrOJJR{UZNfdPyJJ20t2RfMrJ NFJrYWY1-N •< M N O O : O / 7 J L f J waff<~{ffrfOploOOPOP OOPOPPOVUUUYVUVVVV 6 :O% • y a a OJNO• aeaaTNP~ e P w T a m wm •O/ h n O ~O pe 0/1P 1•wP NNI i V11 ~0 PP PP N NO TwNOTwNrIN{TN wN N waeN an •ZI w• T • w a Nm NOaaNN N TT NN~NeTaTTaMwNTT O a WI •>I I • ~ O J 9 wE E OOpp000Mq•OI-POmOna0000NpryOPO00aONOON•O.ImrpOaaOO P1-NNNNONNamONmhONOnm•NOOPONpN0000OgOONgOOewOONa •i• PhrNPhNPNOaNmmaaOhOPNaNhPOmOONNapmO0a0•OgnmNgOm \. 4ry•r0 nNhlh4Nn rNna N NPMMawgNrrmNn m• q0 n an Nr N n m m a y NmnrN" ~ i h a .~ i a v SNP of hiy Vd 1 =~0 fO0 LLNw ON6 LL V iqi ~nmaNahmwmrNmaNaNmwewnm•NanmPpJrynaNahmPeNNmaNehmPprN •z• ^maoa$°rr°-°hn°r°hr nl°-°hnr'-rN.~n~rnn nirN-n nrN..n .N-r nCn:.m-~~~Frm-~nn~~ iia~•+••a••aa••aaaaa•aa••a•••••a•••••aa•aaa•a••• •aa peaaooaaaa<eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaeeaeaeaaeaaaaea<eaa iii u . •. . . . . . . f i • q m i u Nw n ~~ i i w! P o PPe mw NN N r•~ wN iN wW O \N n.l W P P \KJ I n h mm~ <•n •\\ \ <W\ uN i Y • o P \.-N q WW 6\\ \ nYl Pm• Z\ . U 6 aa1.V NN• N Lnn\ \ n S !IN\I\\ • {{~Z YU! nq0 mUPN WW a n2 a 1q[1 I N~ • of aal JJU !1 Lf wl Uh WO yMW ZN NOIIahN6i 1 hOFNgO V IJ\aJ S_M1 n i{ It< .-N tVyNf NNM ! yy aWOa "F~Wh4q N 00~[ i ZiF Jpm aN ~JwWIJ IN JNJI~SJhV OJ11~6\ .O~ Nh OWNNiLLhWO NONO~IUWW3mWp hNVNgwMZa02 4pNwm UJ lVLLLL~WJJONWWOW pJ i\SOONwOOVNJZppLLO\ JW JJJYpFM00 iiiMZl4 LLW4NNNNih wISJNOna JOWN4JJSWN> JW4! ea LLN wIw i!n •\uVa• NlhhNLLL~p4 <Vm Of ~1JW< {t pw<ry Oa<tpW2S<q NLLJOOJZwJw O/,IUJJYUN{Jpu JIJ JLLS Y •1-hZSWNwwJOd pVVG Sh• 75002201g6r LL WZOYKWw Nd LLUNWYN NNO6WOpOWNOMi<00 nipOZ02 i<h Z» UWU NVW Yisz ~Y~ w'J NnNON Wd<\OWYhWY• aNV2wTIWYUJYU 6VY<u4 Suf<UNWpga2UOghNmlNZwN2NOnWd NUI-f WVNgNO Vf hfO OON>6amlJ4NagY NINJ3MU2> fiW >i .w 4hLL• WaLL i< Owi<Mf<Z4i6a<ZN<W iWON •Z<Wd• mt>f aJZVJ611211'OUf JJwf> •J)JN f Nr4>30d 1>f)UIOOg6p<U<6h>awNgpP<UaUUiaa>C4ZUJ « 60gA • 4 . O J 2 H r ~( S O Y O C V WZ F V W VO V y V J ~ J< ~J f N O 7 S wh N OS h 2 4 i Z S4 uI JU J d u •i Wh O U _ Uw V daNJW W_u _ • V NS Z ZZJ~n a <Z O OVq V~ nVi J OMC n4Z i1iiSYt Vii Immw W>S« p< I~NV<iWn>! CeI wJ • W<u3V NN 'I w 4- OU ZWShi4N0 WiiwS WIJaO Y . h0ln NZN4• fOhN N fi !Yd . 6V• •aLL i0• wtJ iY 3 iW . iwwZiV7NiOgfO NiJZ2o00hO •I.¢a >JOq OJ>f• ZVf04[q 2L eV <NFOO 4J00 W •Y<ONN<J IhiO OOd i m'VOSr{:NF1 OJgghVU2WNVVWaIJhddJWW!>NSJJJJN.'>OVJiiS6ia iii VlOIVUUaooooaoooeeoowwuOiw lNUrlWi liaNVVbZZiZSSSZZS Vri. rii riiMiilWi ~[~[ i .h. mNaPN F•01-N M1O PahmmNPN•WpnO. OmnmOhNfmN•rheNNNPNPNm p. PIOOnPPanNm I-NNmNOhP•P NNNnONhmnOa•arMhNOhO al •hNnmryPN gnMN iie mN N ra mvr aNaaaNm•nNmmm N.P.iNmmn • n 4 • .miimm•m •w >• 'I aNm..Pnppo ereeppepoem PePNNNONnplooplprerne NN'Op00 ONOOOOTOOObPNOTOONP n.1m TO10000pn0 ~.NNbO»NNO»anYNN.'.ONN MIbO bINNeTPbmnr1000bNN TON• nm aaPON~n~OPINbT~.mIPPNN TNO pO1mTN r T»be°e ~' N :Ir Nr a NN .~ rTNr ewr r \. Nr ~ Nw aN .. iii r N i v i ~i .O. JT NTINbhOPONNTINbnmPOrryTaNbnmP MNTINmnmPONrvT ¢^IanYM11 NrhrwrrrYrwrhArf rr~w.Y..rrrrlY.n mnFM1FP Ia11•<IVIIf •IlaflaafllllVIVIIIaVafalaal• .•• <c aa : ' ada blmbbbbbmmbo ababbmbbabbbbbbbmbmbbbabbbmbb • bb a i< i s • ~ • u . }R m WJ F ZS O w O< J T OP 00 Z m\ N \ • M 1 i NrP NI N rOW N FF ZZn • <N \S PvNTw NT\i Y hON \ r O~.\POW \OwTH PP TI4N WN..V Z I i nn JOP \NM ml\•N \ JPP VaYO < NH b~ y~ yp 2 _ TiP \..PNN IPWW\\ NJJ WN w \ <l F_N_T l TO\ \ INmT O_9 'N wP IOZ.+I nWli IT}l TYl<\ JJN F <LLN ZNP • W l0\ _ U OTw Z 7N<O <OWP <lm V2~. • T ~~ iYIRINT ryRP OwMN Wml 6 vhNOPJN W P I lJ • Ow6 UM..\7N yjuN wl ¢ ~<~. • J 11 ¢I'l N¢J¢I.OL MS _ J >f Il'1[W JO\Ib66 m U~1 1 1 N SIN •6ThN110W 1rrZjINP1 <f PiF LLVJVWw JW ¢IOh w Y ii0 1 y Z:OZNMGN hi0 IJOONJi O PNWW9Y O U. w-JZI\OWaZUJPi eJRtiWJmO ~IIWI v7Jw 6~hW0 W _ ~~ Z : • : U PO 6YY~Sl 1 ONLL6 W20 OY VJSP OOZ lOm l N LLO ~ . V_ _N< 'J FSNwGLLJVF>NN Jf Nm0 V IWn O O\LL I WryCNO UINVtwJ WUV Z NOjW¢WLL IILN¢N ~OOWNO p)NZS.[ NON WWN 2 NOWU<IOJ\ OW¢ wSOF..Z LL W.h'Iw N..I VW n¢O¢ JhU YpNm~ OOWNNI< LLEw hwW SII YM 1 VYVW» Ww LLN F¢V hMVmnNFmwK n ONLL _ W:Yi.[O S¢NI..nS Ju NZ1WJJJlJZ2pVm1.OJ V O{ ¢Oy 20J„Z W6 w w U OW NfNFWO tn 2¢ ..O W f ¢ p .• p N Z J l W V ~ZLY OZOOSNOmpZpO< ZVO>WNm ..O VUmV22<Ji JVmmZJ Z V LL O LNZiY wi i<M m <t<wf.rnNpV¢UW<NNWIUUOwjUOU WJit61w <<m <NVrS V • Nnl6JFiNOiNwN •..n wiVNZ wVZNSNmnWNV<WrZN2• <Z 61-¢ h S¢¢¢SW .~}ZYm¢PJiVO)OSOO.JYWI .Z¢ ~myPNry¢NFh ~ 1w W0. NhIOLLf(<WW¢'7W6NtWn NLL< VYOWOO7NW<lOU¢w J<> WW. WJwfWOW<.J W<O .W J<LL~ VJN2UJ<JO..f JOW\<>i .P w 4 L(OOI 1S¢OY ¢ZlipN<lZ<p¢i « mIZOhZUIN<NWJV>iOVNV<iONI~. Z ~ V' V i S Y r. O J hV O i0 • N VU Z WN w n i>ZN V S v ~ ~ O I 2 N N •V R NY V ~YS F • y . [ 2Z F 2 WLL Y V uN¢~ ZS Np NZ 2 M U ~ 2 YJ W 00 V V N NJ. V ~ "~ ei oar i i iN ~pz i:unwi N Frt 'v a • hN< e~eWW< J myh .zywo s i• w~NU< Lww e)<WU J Z O = :N6 ORWWi Op¢VI= OO WaV N YZ6M <hFf6MW <V~6i 6)h'.O ¢<N<l miZ 7 mi JY ' O wbyJ .O Wi YMw<¢ <pi>f OJOWMNY< V OZ IN<V JY ZSWWOwN<OOmUOVr J~ mJM<R.. WO1620 SN. wVJ• VOi .[iJVV WO7 NOSSi NW¢ A < < ~ « .J >Vf O.+w NY S JV< fL• NZ2ZSJ fh• JW• 1 VS Wry• Z¢ZS\N •06 .WWSWJO¢O SNZVMwiUV N ~ ~ • Np NJ W<WN UjWWONN<pwNNOr<=Vi wyWRI.¢¢LLm MN i <o- iO ~SOJJ N p •(• O N •~ JV.[<F< JJh (¢mWn. M6 SOSI'SY Y OpNN lYO SONRm 'IYJJZmJfViY1.O SOt<OW UIJ¢¢G1`nlNM090O <fW ~~ O J •L~ lll SSZSZ(ZZ((iiZ(SZiZ0000000OC1Ylll66 1[YJJJJJJJJ ~ ~ • NbrrNNT rPm raN NT O; lmmTbmN Pro TbNOYPraNrOOr IJN n'P TrnNmT IS• Pmh"IiTNn rTnrlmmnPnmNTrvITNNNC~NnNTOPryNP NwIrT a • .. NN 1• •N P .. b TN T •W • • ~~ r .. O N ZN UZN U<T ml V_a ~o„ LLO Nm OjG OPPpOIm N JOPmmmNNTaNTOmNONO N Y N mNhNaNOON O1m Va Oa000a00 NaNOOh0000NO00NOPNN ~+ NaPmO~o0aNO0aNOmNmNN N.. N N .. ~tl. n n r\ /~ JaN al-m AINahOP maNtlFa NahmPONNmaNahmPOwNmfN PF rIP-mmmppemgbeOmOF F~m mO~~a~gN NN NN am`Dempmf aVa.a1..IVPaaP.aaJaa.a•aaaa'IaaaaaV.VaV.aaa~~a of\tlnuvtlaaatloaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatlaaaatlaatlotlaaaaaatlatl tl m . 1\ Iwl\ . \ 1 r\ \N n Imo a ~ r N~ a is a Pz N a .lo N :z ow Nu POVM LW < R O \ NFmJ mN tlV V ObJ l6NY P OWP~V a+\sm. ml v m v mJ •K NSVO h0' Fu<m Fh iNwm OyyNUTV WS UV V J• V ¢SWwJ~JWNJmh hCJ Up OI JL mSVm N IS m 1 mi O O Il uii O VV~ LLNy6jWNOP ON 'DPp W O O w F\ 00 7 >J PS Nn O~ PVMO \U 6¢Nw00 NsONOJ'J aNi <J O o OJ mi RyNm~r .~ O JN NJ GJ JJV VN<Fa <WJOLLfLLf NLL<fm S \. NOJ2060mY0 fl. a PNpmN NL Vn hZ 1-VNRLLm ulNf'J wiz WhihWNFwVW WOOHf~w m Np 2S Zhw2lZWti NS Oa JUY O yLKLLjph LLLLPLJLOiLLp7 WW¢WYWNLwhN> •a WNLL W\upWa21L LLLL Vi0 L Lf aiLL0p0 .ifOU WI-00 Om0<pWW ti mYY Jin N_JMmY m26 Nf m'J.\MLLmNOLL¢VT ~Y T\mWiO r¢m\fY Swi WOSOLLf'L SmWJNWN22 a VpLwiNmmWWN„NS wmNN VWUh¢ mUR NmILLU LYV>r Nj ml T mym~-V JNNFUUI >UW¢rvNN ~-WRnWp Ow~RW'~¢VNOI pOU i W"JVLL. ~LVVUw<¢JWY.f ~ltuOfOOWOtYONhi~mUmNUJ~ N4 N NNOaN C4J.INUN CN nNUiLfnVV a: ii i i •i• •F• ~VI •O~ O [o ro WHW W rcZ~V WVZF 2V Nl> » CON„O o ui `~¢a °o rio°a WJa z V •Wi>IWVJ VJrvVNiuN mi ili.J Wp wSW VVU.N OZh UVV¢iV• MaJ •ON YZVVV.OSOOZUZNZiiVNFZOOa z ifMRO r ¢¢¢W. iNOZ N •00;• N N>¢>WWWOY¢ ON• ONS V_ WSwwYU¢it ww0 OOOJO¢i~ O 0>Urt>Y LLW Y2NwVF r. •wwNNNOO`o.« < .ryu2Nc ym¢¢¢¢tZRZ6YnNNNNNNNNNNN ~~ f U iOi < ~}3 ~a °u J 2 W_N<J_ u r 1 N F 6f W : ~ °R N O °n z ° .L. O OJ NVVWYJJ NIZ 00 Ii Jh hVi~JNiP>OaWfY ww w wNNrOVONNNfp<L¢UZw¢U p ZN N LL pJ _O _W MIYh¢JWUU~ uV¢ WwmzNNU~>~i>:z rl[JOWiLLLLZ¢f VU u W¢. OVVNJ> ¢LNff OZN~t~SiLJZN nJJ 00 O Wfh70¢¢¢'J 7R. mifWW .NN N NNNNnnFfhhM » i>aaaaa OaNN P aON MaN o!- N ONa.PN~4NmmPtlPmpmNP1 FTOJ• mNNO nmaOaNNTNNNPMN m N Mommm emenN.ImNrvPhNa.N !N NNN NN N n T+iN mT N m n NmNNNN NP11i1TN T N NN I~ i ~ ~ ~W ~L• ii ~ ~ ¢t •O• •S~ ~>• J J 2 N iNa `iw ~f. Sf0 iue ROH ~»4 ui ~i ~i z: o• iii n'e'mn'o aeHO'H~ v~ririr+iu .~ w~» Nr~ry ~ u ~`Jno..N N.naNea vomaohM1i-r-r-n meemes o~oa .oa N~oaou Vf • f V Y N FNP O P „NIWON ry ssahrwa~ f tOe n°a °n .n u 2»»Vff Wl~12N» •N NFjMNVJJN N » JJUfan )po»CYffWNO W h_hOhyysN»F N W{LLWW»O`w ZCNLZZC yZ hffifY~Vw»~ ~WYOaeW s OWTO}WW.IW Nw u'ooNe oy 'o i°nni o` Nu 2 V V y i O i ~~ ¢p• WO 2 2 VV O 02 wi0 MffVF20 VhVhiWW Ow~J ~[¢ •6NVhWYYw.~M OLLw6ZZf)Vfp ___ONNO• V V ~ VSOW ri~~ruuoosir »z»suWi WWSNCWfWW )i))))SRNNN •~Nh ar-mmmN r~~n~~~ Tha nNnnnnorrln NN NnN ry n 1 J 2..a _e~m ., i Q ~6:j _ C C ° ~ea m=°~~ GC R ~ 1 Y~d°-~F =~~ .ems m ~ 81E.3 3 m ~ "^S~ s 5 E..SFe St° egE:t ~W _`- r "~~ ew~~~s~ 'a3 '~~ ei_ia t._ ..- Y~r '~ a~~AB a RE w° K ~t~_ °d k~V~S ° ~ ~ k ~3.- x°T:~a~ Y;.: ~ ~ f T"€:~3 ~~~ ~ 8 S .E >Y --~~AS~fEn~& _- - CR'S ~~ ' 9s ^S^-oS::-BUR ee_^_ _~ _ ~~ ^m:9SR~R .^° a _ 5q '~' ~~b % A'~ C S __ _ m m S___SSS88R~ rF R %%8% iC o- u ~~'~ 58888888888 .4 ,°.% 8 °S`R~ r° 8~~~ - ~ , ~R888~%8~~~ ~ ~8 .~S d r~ a C~ `" ~%%~88~8R~8 g ffi_ % ~~2 ~ _ ~, ~ e - - - - ~ ~j ~8888~$8588 5 ~8 ~ 8 S~DB m € % j ^- a~8$$~~$~~8 o a~ s s ~a~~ $ ~ s Us a! ~asa~,~,~a~s m ~; n a ~~~a S g s ~ a ... _ _ _ ., R y~y~~ "' 58858888888 5 XS & 'SSD ° 5'~m E V ~V a ~%8888%%%8% - m 6a ,~ ~x r. .. 5 _ - - = I _ .e _ _ _ ... _ ~: ~W ssc - m m ~° oovoc.a vee r ~ eeee e ° s$ e ~''~ ~e~4~~~9 ~~~ ~6 a_~v aff ~~ '~s~~ffi~~~s~ ~ay a ~~ ~~~:~ ~ `s'~-~ ~~ ~ ss `a aass~~a~~ °s aka ~ ~~~~s s ~~ ~~ "c ~~ a 1 yJ ' ' 2 yy ~ tl tl v ' ~ ~ ~ ' F £ ' 1[ m •'~ ~ _ -~~>DCD^5888 ~ ~ Y ~ ~ '~ y~ _ $ g 5 y ~ ~^ ~ 2 ~ ' WS88S88~?$$8 ~$ Li % wb ~%R$8 ~ $ .. y nu ~~ '~ i 33 L ~ _ q F ` n n~ ~'i : ~ ~ ~ ~~& ~ y 2~' S` 9 e~~ S u ^~ S^ d 5 ~ i y y ~ Y _3 Y S ~°'. F ~,~ Q ~ g 3, A Y e q S ~ e e e8 =R % 4S '. E~ Y~~ - 8 ~ ~~ 8 .~4R S.. '. e _ m ~ ~~ _ _ ~R 8 W ~ ~~ a8 ~8 R ~8 ~ yy S=C_a 8 ! _ 3g ~ ~ r~ Y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x '~ __ „~- 3C °~ ~ 8 Y m ~ ~ . . _ ~ f ~- ~ E I € i I _ N~ m RS R j e 8S~ e $ mX ' _ _ ~ _ s> ', s ym e e g _ s e~e sas ~, _- ~~ a ~ ~~ ~ ~ '~ S ~3 CC sEf4 '" ~Y ~~ ~~ 5 ~ ='p' ~~ir~ Y ~~a Se 5 5~~ ~ a ~ 9~a~ ~ E e _ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ' _ ~ Q - e E ~ ~ 9 ~ a N ~~ g8$ g SR J §§ y ~$ 1 ~~ ~ ~~8~8 a tr ,, _ y j c Y 5 k u ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 12, 1992 TO: City Council 4~- I FROM: Debra Adams, City Clerk/Records Manager BY: Tony Russell, Records Clerk SUBJECT: DEBTRUCTION OP CITY DOCUNENTB it is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the City Attorney and City Council. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/tr attachment 9a-o5y RE4lLUPION NO. ~ A RFSOIl7PLON OF 'IAE CPPY CODNCIL OF 7}fl; CPM GF RANCHO CD(7~1(~A, CAESEORNIA, AVIHORIZI2G T[~ DESi72[7LTi0N OF CSE'1 RETARDS AND D0C7.44FI7I5 VIIffCH ARE NO IONGFI2 RD~[7IRID AS PR7VIDID UNDER GOVII8~A4TIf CODE SFCiICN 34090 1d~12FA.S, it has been determined that certain City records under the chazge of the following City DeparGmnts are no longer required for public ar private purposes: H[JILDING & SAFETY DIVISION BUSIIJEiS LiCINSING DMSION CtYMfUM'lY SERVICES ETNANCE Dnnslox PLQXHASING DMSION wHFRfAS, it has been determined that destruction of the above- mentioned materials is neoes. wry to wnserve storage space, aryl reduce staff time, ~r~, and wnPusion in handling, and informing the public; and WHERFA.S, Section 34090 of the GovernmPirt Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City deparG~wnt to destroy any City rewris and docimients which are over two years old under his ar her drarge, without making a copy thereof, after the same are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written wnserrt of the City Attnrney; and WE~I2FA5, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made apart hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are over two years old; arrl Wt1ERFAS, said records have been approved for destruction by the City Attorrwy. NdiV, 7fiII12EEORE, this City Council of the City of Rarxfio Qsamorga does hereby resolve as follows: SFX,TION 1: 'fiat approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those rewrds described as Ethibit "A" attarhs3 hereto and made a part hereof. SEX`170N 2: 'itat the City Clerk is authorized to allow ermmination by and donation to the Departtmnt of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society denigrated try tt,e City Council, any of the rewrds described in Exhibit "A^ attached hereto a!d made a part hereof, except those deemed to be wnfidential. SECPION=: Tat the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter, the same shall be in full force and effect. Re.olution No. 92-*** Page 2 pASSID, APPFDVFD, and ADDP1'ID this 18th day of March, 1992. ~ AYES: Fuexdrdsr, 8uguet, Stout, Williams, Wright NOES: None A&SfS7P: None De:vus L. Stout, Mayan ATPESP: Debra J. Pdans, city Clerk I, DFSRA J. ADPMS, CITY CLf]II( of the City of Banda Cupmotga, California, do barely oectify that the foregoing pesolvtion was duly passed, approved, and adopted tR' the City Cumicil of the City of Patx3w Cu~ga, California, at a regular aeeting of said City mil held on the 18th day of March, 1992. FJCeuited this 19th day of March, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk ~~ Resolution No. 92-+++ Page 3 .. ° OF 4AYCN0 C7CAMCXGA )es; n:cNan Net'fi w:'c^. 4e PC•~ 'AGE: ^,ATE; C2/^3/92 ': ME: "~:9':93C iPE °OLLCN!YO RECOR7$ ARE $GPFDULF9 °04 DESTRL'C'[GY. PLEASE iN0!CATE OE$!4E9 9:EPC5"'^9. $!SA A%C 4E'0.44 ?^ '°E 4E°0495 MANAGEMEV? ;!- 41SiD4. Y /'°E RE00~49$ [c.cn gP-ON MA" A:L 9E .'.°TR:YFC X- 4E'A 64 TYO$E REOCRDS MAR%ED NI?P AN % °OR 'ICN'H5.9ES'ACY 'NE 9E$T F: L'- C: A2'3 4ECDR7S COOAO!NATOR: LEAC4. L!40A OEe- ~ l3+3 OE?* RAM6 3!': L7!4C 6 $AfF?° 9!V MAp. SCR?: ou0!IE: !7'1!999-'B'.! °%?~ 227"^. VA 4K )p?E$ '%` EVEN' 9C% OON'E4'$ °.47!' TC eE9MAXEVT 4•.OCRC C?R. )ES?RCV 4ETR!EVAL 90% 87% 90. L7CA?!ON 9cx C1-1992 OA*'. $EYi •C GENERA'. ~-PTER$. •EMOS AMC OOR 0./C'/09 4!37/99 IC6 Cd-03 ~2 2 12-199' °;'ie- A A CI M.'/A9 12/37/09 Polde^ A 2 S C'. /71/89 12 /3C/89 °c'der A 3 91 /C!/89 12/30/09 °c'~de^ A 0'/0'/89 12/3C/A9 =o `der A 5 E 71lC 1/89 12/3C/89 fc'der P . ' C1 /C1 /89 12/30/89 °o!der A ' G C!/C!/09 !2/37/89 °c'',de^ P 9 " 01/C!/09 12/3C/09 c'der P 9 Cq^!/89 12/30/89 °c'der A I. O7 /C 1/89 !2/30/09 °a der P Y 7!/7!/89 !2/30/89 °o lde- P '2 '. 0!/D1/B9 !2/3C/89 °o'ae^ ' '3 M DV01 /89 12/3C/09 c'de^ A 'e Y 71/7!/89 12/3C/99 rc'der A 'S C 71/01/89 '1/30/89 ~o leer v '9 0 71 /C 1/89 '.2/30/89 ~o':e^ P '7 C 7'10!/09 '2/3C/B9 c'de^ 7 '9 0!/01/09 12/30/89 °older A !9 5 ^!/7!/89 !2/30/89 fader A 20 01/0!/89 12/30/09 °o'der A 21 D. V 01 /01 /B9 !2/30/89 ~~'der P 22 X 01/^.'; 09 12/30/89 'c!der P 73 x. '!, Z 9'/)!/89 12/30/09 c''.de^ 7 2< ?RAGS 7'. /71 /B9 !2/30/89 vc 7 der 9 20 d?H $'AEE? b OEY°ER DR!VE 7'. /01 /B9 '2/3C/09 c'de- : 23 5?M $?REE? 91/0!/89 12/3C/A9 clde^ v 2t ?T4 5?REEi 9'M 1/89 !2/3C/89 'a ae^ v 20 0?" ST4EE' 9'/89 12/39/89 c'der v 29 9'H $?RE'.T C`/0'./B9 12/BC/B3 ~c'de^ 6 37 '9*~ crgEn 71/C!/09 12/3D/B9 ~c'der A 3' ..'~ <?REE* 91 /0'/B9 12/30/89 ' . Y!$OF LANEOL'S L'.^EAS 6 CCRRES C!/!9/09 12/19/89 ° M~ELJC +* dC7 7d-f)-72 3 +2-'99' Oa te: 'ME XEAC Oate: A9$'. CI'V A. RNE° ~~ laPSOlutiAxA No. 92-+** Page 4 .. ° Cf RANCPO CUCAMONGA r Ces'°r,;'or. Not"ica;+:n 4eccr; 'AGc--: CA'E. 02/^3!92 -; yc. .. :000 .dE fC!_CN:VG PEC7RDa ARE SC4ED'JLE^, cUR OES'RJC'!ON. aLASE':4O!CA'° . CES: PEC C:SPCSi':OV. 3!G4 AAn pcmgN .n roc Rc_CDROS NANAGEME9- 7:- !!S!CV. Y ~/`'hE ?EDCRCc !!crc; an CX NAY 0.LL SE DE 'RC°E7 ® ?ETA!N -°CSE AECCACS NARYEO X!?4. AN X FGR ___qON*uS,nccr4Yy .uc qcS? .._ C, A3'? aECCRC3 :CORD [HA?OR: LEACH. i!NCA °,co^ a3'3 ____________ ___ 7cP' VANE: 9U:!C!NG B SAFET° 0!Y 4:'. ________________________________ __-___ SOR?: _-__ ~4O4E: !~'E `909-'93' c%'~ 22^C •A4Y nArc _S oERMAN ____--__________-_-______-__ E9? RECORD C'R. DES?ROY ____________--______ AE'R!.cVl: 90N :N` EVEN'' 0CX CCW?EN?3 FRO! ~. RCX NC. !OCA'!ON 9cx 0'-!99? CATE SEY' 'C -J _________ J` -c''9er ¢ ___ ____________ __JV __________--_--__--______{e oc H.l~s# "^OE A!OO!°!CA'IOV g0.J.,.,,~ ______________ n!/!9/09 -____________. 72/'9/89 .__-________________ :':e^ ¢ 2 CODE V!OLAr!ONS-CCRRESPONDENCE 7U' ;'/!9/B9 02/'9/09 c'de^ ¢ G .AN°AR° ?EC4 cg Y5 0"'9/89 02/1 o/B9 o'der I 1 EXPI RAT ICN OF PLAN CHECK ;!/'9/89 ^.2/!9/99 cc''.?e^ ¢ c. 4C?!°!OAr!OY Oc P!AN CHECM E%P. CC?-Cc.C 09 C1 /!9/89 02/!9/89 °c''ee^ ¢ 5 40T!4CATIDY OF w_AN CHECK E%P. JU!'!-SEPT 99 0'/!9/89 02/19/89 Feder ¢ ' +Cr i~!CA'!^.Y Oc aLAN DAECX E%D, FDA!!-J UN c_ 09 0!/19/89 02/!9/99 co'de~ I 9 YGT. I F!CAT'.ON OF a!AN CNECN EXP. DAN-MARCH 89 ^!/'9/89 02/'9/09 ccl der 4 9 PEAK CHECK EX?. FILES JUL°-0EC 09 01/19!09 02/!9/89 fcl de- ¢ '0 DEAN CHECK E%'. FILES JAY-JUNE 89 °1/'9/09 02/19/09 cd'de- = '_CYC GOOL59Y CORRESP. ANO MEMEOS 89 C'. /!9/89 92/!9/09 cc ider I '2 .'ERP° GRANT CORRESP. AND !IEMOES 99 01 /'9/89 02/79/09 Feder P '. ;:! MA Rr;N CO R4ESP. ANO MEMOS 89 C!/!9/B9 02/19/89 °c'. der ¢ v M!L?ON MASSANE? CCRRESD. AXO MEIpG 99 9'/19/09 02/'9/09 5''~de• ¢ JACK LAM CORRESF. AN0 MEMOS 89 01!!9,'09 C2 /!9/09 c'der A ''.6 eh!L NOSLEY CORRESP. AHD MEMOS 09 0!/'9/89 01/19/09 d de^ ¢ '+ NARY YAOER! COFRESP. AN7 REMOS 99 O'. /!9/89 02/'9/09 °o'de^ ¢ '9 CAR!OS 5!:YA CORRESD, ANC MEMOS 89 0t /19/09 02/!9/09 °c'.der ¢ '9 J!N '40NA5 CORAESP. AND KENOS 09 0'!!9.'09 72/19/89 °o'der ¢ 2C J:M SC4ROECER CORRESP. AXO MEMOS 09 C1 ~':; 99 02/!9/99 o~cer ¢ Y. JCMN *40MA3 CORRESP. ANC MEMOS 09 01;'9/0? 02/19/89 °c'der A 22 CORRESPON^.ENCE IN - E981NEEA3 C'/I9/99 02/'9/89 S lder I 23 DCNO CORRESPONDENCE IN 7+/!9/09 02/!9/89 cc'. der ¢ 21 SAN 9ERNAROLYO CO. PERCULATiON REPORTS 71/19/89 OZ/!9/89 °o'de^ ¢ 25 AITHOAiZA?IOX i0 OBTAIN 0!/19/89 02/!9/09 °o'de^ 1 26 AE!N)S AND CORRESPONOENCE LN 01/19/89 92/!9/99 °c'de^ ¢ t? EMPLOYEE REOUES? cOR !EAVE :!/!9/89 02/'9/99 °a'der ¢ ?9 CORRESPONDENCE !v - ccop n./'P/B9 02/!9/89 cc lder 0 ?9 10??c.RS Cc OCC'JaANCY 7!/!9/99 C2/!9/B9 Feder I 3C C4a; RAGE FEE RECE!P?S C'./'.9/89 O2l19/99 cc'. der ¢ 9UILOING B SAFE'Y OENEAAL ;NFC 71/19;89 '2/'9/99 . PLAX CHEC K AND DEAN!? F".E COD 0?/C1 /09 79/29/89 A00 ^,1-C3-OZ B 09-199' / / a- ~ 9~_ ~' ___' G~ ' - - - - --- ~ ~'-~`~--~L--------... ---- 7ate: 1MENT MEAD :ate: 4SST . C!?Y AL ANEY -- ~~ xesolutim t7o. 92-+~~ Page 5 -.?Y CE AAHCHC CUCANCNGA CeSt^sc:ion Vc;i'ica;•. ca Reccr; c45E: 3 7A?E~ ^.2/^.3/92 ,4c cC~ ~cCyy;VG AECCRCS ARE SCucOip En c.~fl Jc-5?M'C^CN. c! EASc- :NCi:A'E „E 7ES[RE7 ::SVGS!?!0.Y. S!GN ANO RE':'RY *0 'Hc- REC0RC5 MANAGEBIEN' :. YuS!CW. % a/~4E RECGRCE : •mcC on pyt MAv ALL Bc ncsTgGveG % RE-A!N '4C'SE ?ECCQCS MARS EC M!'H AN N cCR MCN•H9. 7ESTRCY '4E RES' y -.-- ... A3T' `~~ PECC479 COCRC!NA?OR: LEACH.::47P C cor 1373 CEP* NAME: 9U!l G!N6 6 SAEE'v CIV tA!'- 509': P"0!IF: !P/;989-'BS1 EN?: t2CC t/4N GATES "c-AMANEVT QECGRO C'R. CE9?ROY RE'Ri EVAL BO% ;N; EYc.R' 90% CON-EN?5 V~QON TG BOX XC. LOCAT ICN Bar 7'-1992 DAi c_ SEN? ?C Pa'der R J.'Lv :999/ B9-933! ?HRC 89-9619 C7!C!/89 09/19/89 cc'~er A t ---Y !989/ 89-9650 '4AU 89-!0007 "NC!/89 79/t9/89 cd der A 3 JULY 1999/ 69-!0001 ?HRU 89-!03:9 77/C'/!9 09/29/89 °o'Cer t d Y '999/ 99-17320 ?HR'J 99-':562 77/7!/99 09/29/99 Pc'•der A c, AUGU57 '989/ 89-10663 TNkJ 89-!7989 77/0'/99 09/29/89 °^'Ctr A 6 AUGU57 '989/ 89-'0989 ?NR'J 99-'1392 71/0+./89 09/29/89 °o3 Cer A ^ AUGL'S'. 1989/ 99-!:393 ?HAU 89-!'876 01/0!/99 C9 /29/89 Eolde^ 7 9 AUGU9? !989/ 89-!!811 ?4k,' 99-!2288 77/7!/89 09/29/89 Eo'. Cer A 9 SEP?EM9ER '989/ 89-'2289 ?HAU 89-!2550 07/0!/89 04/29/89 co!Cer A '7 SEPTEMBER '909/ B9-'255! ?H,R'J 89-!2818 CT/C'/89 C9/29/Bi cc'_e^ A •' SEP?EMBER !983/ 89-!28/9 iHRll 89-!3!65 :7/C!/B9 09/19/89 °o!Cer A '2 SEP?EMBER !989/ 89-:3!56 ?HRU 89-'3!60 7T/0!/89 09;29/99 V:AN CHECH ANC VEAM!' ci if COV 'C/0'/89 I2/29/oe colder A ' OC•O9ER !989/ 99-!31 S! ?HRU 99-!3668 `c!de^ 4 CC'OBER 1989/ B9-!3369 ?HRU 8S-!/OBd c'Ce- 0 3 CC'79ER !989/ 99-'1095 'H2L' 99-!1371 'elder A d CC09ER +989/ 89-!1372 ?HRU 89-!1832 c. !der / 5 VCVEMBER !989/89-7/833 iNA:' 99-!5!38 Ec1de, A 1 NOVEMBER !989/ 89-!5189 ?NAL' B9-!S52S co'.Cer R 8 NCYEMBER 19891 89-'5627 iHRU 89-15710 °o!dt^ A 9 NOVEMBER !989/ 89-!ST/d iMAL' 89-!5997 `u:~e^ A 'C 7ECc.!IBER :989/ 84-!5998 THRO 89-'5208 Eo!Ce^ R 7E7EMBER !989/ B9-!6109 ?NFL' 89-151!! Vc!der A '2 7ECEMBER '989/ 89.151!5 'H 9U 89-'6773 Eo'de^ A '3 7ECEMBEA :989/ 89.16701 THRL' 89-7679' d99 CI-C3 ~92 5 !2-'991 .'9'/89 '2/29/89 !7/0'/89 !2/29/89 !^./7!/P9 12/29/89 !9/9!/69 12/29/99 '0/91/BS '2/29/89 `./0!/B9 12/29/89 '0/01/89 '.2/29/89 10/0!/69 !2,"t9/B9 '^,/01/89 12/29/89 !C/C'/89 '2/19189 '0/0!/89 '2/29/89 'C/0!/B9 11/29/89 ~1.7'9LV c~~' Dace: /~ A59+~!T,v SBRN. Oa•e: M.N? EA A? ev ~~ 90NE5 ?0 BE 7ESTAOYED Resoluti~ No. 92-*** Page 6 DESTRUCTION A ~'FHORi7ATiON FOR R ORDC DEPARTMENT BUILDING & SAFETY pREpAREp BY/DATE TONY RUSSELL/2-4-92 RETENTION 1 vFpR DESCRIPTION OF RECORDS: 1986 THRU 91 PLANS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES TRACT ~ DATF_~yn ,~,~ ~~ 10345 PH III 10-13-88 13057 f,~S-SO-88 13443 OB-08-88 11606-2 04-27-86 11606-1 07-20-89 12833 02-OB-88 10414 03-11-88 10414 PH II 09-15-88 10349 02-16-89 11606-1 04-1.3-89 11606-1 04-28-89 10210 11-30-89 10045 03-17-88 10035 05-16-88 9225 12-31-86 APPROVED F/O~P. DEST/RUCTION BY: EP NT ~ .- 3-9-91 ASST. CI ORNEY RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION a:~ Resolution No. 92-*** Page 7 ~ DATE ISSUED 13059 12-02-87 13118 PH IIII 05-03-88 13560 OB-16-88 12671 OS-22-88 12577 12-03-87 12873 06-18-86 13060 04-02-87 13060 07-27-87 13060 04-26-88 10827 03-11-87 13825 10-12-88 13722 C8-18-88 11577 ~03-06-87 10827-I 09-15-87 10827-2 08-17-87 10827-2 01-04-88 10827 03-21-86 13697 06-04-88 13697 01-24-89 12671 09-11-87 12833 02-08-88 13 G27 01-18-89 12944 OS-31-89 13057 07-23-87 13057 08-12-87 13058 01-14-88 13342 07-20-87 13367 04-27-89 13353 11-13-87 13353 05-16-86 13642 02-17-89 13621 02-06-90 13558,59,60,61,62 & 63 05-17-88 13559 03-24-83 13722 03-07-89 13557 06-20-88 13475 11-25-87 13476 10-10-88 13541 03-21-89 13425 06-09-89 -'>X13022a Ru,..,<d le, ocx..wn~ 11-16-86 12939 03-24-89 12952 03-04-88 13697 01-24-89 12643 06-03-88 13742 10-28-86 10349 05-05-88 10349 02-01-89 10349 05-17-88 R~oltttion No. 92-*** Page 8 C: TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONBA Oeetructtan Ibtltiwtion Report eAGE: OA?E: 02/^.3/91 ?;ME: !!: !E:'OO 'NE FCLLOXLNu RECORDS AAE SCHEDU'~E7 FOR CES?Rt'C?ION. D:EASF !XD:CA?E THE DE$!REC 7!SPCS!?:ON. Si 6N ANO 4E?URk *C 'NE RECORO$ NANA8EME9T C!- V;S!Ch. Y /*yF 4E°0405 L!5'EC 9ElCX MAY AL: 9E OES?ROYcn, % RE'A:A 'NOSE 4ECCRCS NARNEC N!?M AN % PoA MCN'MS. CE$*RC~ 'XE RES? 9!lL 'C: 1'E2 RECORDS COOAC!NATOR: VARNEY LXUL% 7E?' : i~52 7EP? SAME: %$1NE55 LICENSING NAIL SOA MARX DATES %! EVEN? 80% CCtlY?ENTS FROIV ' ^ LICENSE PA'rt1EN?5: BUS INESG ANO C'/0!/87 tt/29/88 ' 0 -i CENSE PAYMENTS: 9USINE55 AXO C1/O1 /87 !2/19/88 _ LICENSE DAYMENTS: BfI5INE55 AND 0!/01/87 !2/29/88 ' 7 l!CEXSE PAYNEN?5: 9U5!NES$ ANO 0!/C'. /88 12/29/88 r P'+CXE: !711!989-!BP S%?: 2072 ?EANANEX? RECORD L?R. "ES?ROY RE7RIEYAL 30% 9C% NC. LOCA?!ON 4cx 9'-'992 DA'E 5EN? '= 6C 01-C5-73 2 72-'.39' S' C7-Cfi-C3 3 '1-'99! fit Oi-05-03 1 !1-!991 late: 7EPAR?ME9? MEAD eu: ASST. C1T+ AT. EY SO%ES '0 9E 9E5?ROYE7 / a7 Resolution No. 92-*** Page 9 .. ?'! OE RANCHO NCAMONGA ~ Oestrcricn Nat?fi cat!on Rear! °IGE; ' 7AtE: 72/03/92 ':XE: 1':d!:C3C , OLIOX!9S RECOPCS ARE SCHECII'E" FOR 7E5?RC'C'!ON. PLEASE i9"!GATE ?°E 7ES!RE^ "!SP^S;?!7N. Si GN ANC RPURN ?0 i!'E 9ECOA05 MANAGENE9? :.- V:S!ON. %XHE RECCRCS L!5?E7 BELCX NAY ALL BE CES?RCYEC X RE*A!4 ?HCSE RECCR75 MAgNE7 X!TH AN % FOR !dON?H5.7E5TRCY ?ME ¢ES? SP-L 'C: dE 32 RECOR75 CWR7:NA?OR: 5!LRAHEN. NARE9 CEcT AS32 Ca.°T VANE CCM'A1N:?Y SE,4V!C'.5 NAIL SOR?: ?HCNE: '21/1989-'95! '.%'. 2'.^.9 MARK ^A?ES °ERNANEN? RECOgO C?q, CES?ROV RE'RIEVAL 9CN !A1 EVEN' 90N CON'EN'S FR3k ~. 80%N0. LOCA?!OX Box 0-'992 OA?'- GE9T ?: _' C RECREA?17N FILES: RECE[°'.S C!/C`/99 "/0'/89 dC'. CS-C2-03 3 ~1-'94' °c'de- P Xi 9'E4 99/89 AEGISTRA?ION RECE!P?S !'/".'/99 '.'/C:/99 vp~de- t ~ c°°!4G REGIS?RA'!ON RECE!a?S 89 '1/".!/98 11 /C'. /89 Po!".er t 3 EAU. REG!5*RA?!ON 9ECE1 P?5 !989 "/0'./Be !'/0!/99 _ AECREA?!7N FILES: RECE!P?5 09/29/89 O'/29/9C 173 CS-02-C3 S 0!-1992 'o'2er t ' SUNNER 1989 REGIS?RA?!ON RECEIP?5 79/C?/B9 C!/29/90 Po'der t 2 XIN?ER 1990 RE IS?RAi;UN RECEIPTS OVCc/99 09/29/89 - Oa:e: DEP N ? NEAC Oate; A55?. C..Y A??0 9CXE5 TO BE 7ESTg0YE0 2 ~~ R~014Ati61 No. 92-*** Page 10 .. .c RAYC°::'. JAVC'!Sd -•V:. .. ..^W.'.. 7 _..7:5 ...... _ -__-R ...• ~ =55:,. ....:e ' ....%c. :>^c. :7Yt ..?ti AY: ?°^, 4Y . ?E":?".5 •A4 ASEr°4- .. ~ /_: .. ::1 ' "_.. .- ...__".n V!V !:....SRC°C5 u' Z C'e.4 ' ...: / 7cr ?;c VAR+E; A. " 14 % c:R V^"cE.: 'R." _ __ .._ ...'E' .:RCE CCCRI:44'C?: 9ee'Y i~.z- .. ... :?- •ierc: c:1'AVCE •A:'- E"R' : -C49: "'! `999-' . Ev-: 2;cc . :e •cc °c °u 44E4' .:7R::'7. .=c-?P.° ~E'c:°YA'~_ ?C% • .... 0":% CC1'EV'< SES:V4'4E E4 ^; 4S _ 0CX vE . .C:A`: C4' Sox . .-'992 ;A'c 0ry- .. --. _- X °fVv ___ _________________ o __.___- S ec 5 LAYCE_EC : ~ . ,. '2.2. /°e _._.______- .. _-_-_____________ .-C2-C9 ____---. ______________-___ .-'oc~ x' ] ..:C°' NC4•.; Y; °AD:?; 5'/C'/0' '2l29!oc n uc n vv ,,,. '2-C3-52 ? '2-'99' ", ae- p ~ nc R.C. ?'?`-00 f4CdRAe{ CE SERV:C°. !C'/07 '2/29/80 •pe. p 2 •~o i_o° ?'.yEE' AMEti^,V°n`5 'AD°4CVSC' ,.'!0' '2/25/00 -^'ce' f 9 'fo,/oa :AR4vCVE'r :'/:;!°.' '2/29/uo :'ae• a rSLE''-'. A4EC:'S CC4Rc.S°CVCE4CE :'!:'/0' 72/29/00 :':e- f . .. _' !CJ"5'vcy-c g w, 9'J%E` PE4': cu ..;'I?' '2/29/90 'fe' f cE75CV4E"_ cg4Yt , ,n./0+ y/29 /?? _ ''e' f .. ' °4C.'0_C':.9 ':R3VSrE"c'> ?-'.-00 :'/7','9' '2/29/9P .'ee- . ...':vA-S) 7E'JEYC55 'S0'-.. :'/:'/0, ,2/2°/v0 / : ]4:'-° :ASV 9ECE: °~4 'S 15'/05 :9 /29 /0fi '9' '3-^.'-C2 ? :9-'99' / : ...' ~4 S° 7ECE:°'S :9!5'/0,0 •'l19 /90. '~0 '?-C2-:2 2 "-'°9• v . 7e:-° 'e2° :ECE'p5 ,.'•f0 ,^9 r0, •0r .-02-^2 . . -'992 _ ....... ~„~.a ~y a 3 9 y2 ~'G2~ _ 3,3!9Z~~1 2 :a:e. :cO/G'YE4`~°'~a ce: Q455-. :.'° }`-., VS° ~'1 REvolution No. 92-*** Page 11 .. ° C' 4ANCNC CSCAAgN6A Ces:rc^'c^, Nc:"'ca:'o°. Reec•; DICE: ;A"E: :?1::'92 - _ .. _.:N: Y£ 4ECCRCS e4 c. SCPE:"J _c: c04 CES'4CCTiC4. ?LEAS` :VC::A'a ' 9ES: RE9 :'SNS:'i:V. i59 AVC PE`CPN 'C '°E PEC.4C5 NA4ASENEYT ::- ..,... y ~./ E PEC7R9E L.., ; ?El CX rA. A:L ?E ^ES'4C°E: X 4E, e;V -:^SE ocC:R:f rAQ1EC Xi'° A4 X cCQ wryTU5.CE5T'vC° '~E Pc.S- _ - : REC74C~ CCCRCi VA'C.R: 9ee'v Saar ;E>' .. :P' VAr c. <: YAYCE rA:'_ `.: P' rA 4Y CA'ES 'k `, EVE4' ?C% CC4'E4T5 ?E3:NN:4G ESC;VF r oc4kA4E4', PE:C4C :'P. ;cS'4C° 4E T4 i 4'/A. ?C% ?CN VC. ::A is CV Scx C -'952 CA'E SV' '; v : ._. 45;:495 '2!C ,. '2!?"JP9 .9C -^.2 : .-'a9' _ ~~ r~ 6 ' r Cate: Jt ARPEY' °EAC __.. Dots: ASS'. C.'0 a:7~_ _ _ _ 49%ES 4EEC:YG m oc qc. ~Ak:: °CR :E:'R,;:':04 9^%ES TC 9E CES'4CYEC !: rc'u.YC :hose r"N s; ~e QE'7AVEC? , 30 Resolutirn No. 92-*** Page 32 C:?Y OF RANCHO C'JCAXOMBA Destrucacc NoNf!ca:!a. Aeoort ~ SAGE: ' ;ATE: 02/03/92 TIMF: '.:!1:270 nc c0!!ON!NG RECCRCS ARE SCHEDL4EO FOR DES?TC?:0.Y. PEASE !VCICA?S ?~E CE5I REC O!SPOS!?!CNr 5!GN AND RE?JAN ?0 THE RECORDS MANAGEMEN? ]:- Y!5!ON. % V*NE RECOAOS LISTED BELON MY ALL 9E OES?ROMEO. x RETA!4 7HCSE 4ECCROS wARXEO N^H AV % FOR !10!1•HS.DE5?ROY •HE PES* 9P.'- ?C: <'63 AECORCS COORC!XA?OR: NR'.'SE JCAY .EP` : 1'E3 OEP* VANE: %:ACHASLY6 MAIL SCR': PHONE: 6'11969-'66~ c%?: 2D69 MA~4X CA?ES aERMAXENT RECORD C?R. OES'ROY RETR:EYAL 9CX !X; EVEN? 9C% CON?EN?5 FROM ?C BOX N0. !OCA?ION Box 0!-!992 DA?E SE9' TC 0/ oAOM'CT SERV!CES:CONSL?AN T S YE 01!01/69 !2/29169 •* 4EL0 •' S8 C i-0{-C2 2 12-199! ~ . ,/ Date: O ARTMFN? HERO Data: A55?. CITY A^0 ~%ES TO BE CESTROYEO 31 - CITY OF RANCHO C[;C.AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Co FRDM Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE SUPPLE ENTAL FUNDING REQUEST BY SCS ENGINEERS - CONSULTANT FOR AB 939 ,~.~uj~ ~ .,:.. H' r- The City Council approve the supplemental funding request in an amount not to exceed $8,240 to paid from the County of San Bernardino's Trust Fund Subobject No. 020, Fund 545. During the preparation of the Final Report for AB 939, the State of California enacted new legislation upgrading the status of the Household Hazardous Waste section of the Element. The State guidelines for these elements became available in late March, 1991 and the level of effort to comply with the new guidelines did require additional work by SCS Engineers. The three areas of additional work required for the elements included: additional preparation for the Household Hazardous Waste Element; further waste diversion analysis; and aself-haul survey. In order to meet the State guidelines, the West End Coalition requested SCS Engineers to go back and check the contacts made with local recycling centers to quantify existing diversion levels. This effort resulted in an increased diversion amount for all jurisdictions except Chino. SCS was also asked to conduct a survey of self-haul loads at the Milliken Landfill in order to capture local generator diversion information for self-haul loads for the waste generation component. The additional diversion amount that was identified has been incorporated into the technical appendix of the solid waste generation studies. SCS Supplemental Funding Request March 18, 1992 + Page Two The funding source for the additional work required of SCS Engineers comes from a Trust Fund established with the County of San Bernardino for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Council will recall the County of San Bernardino imposed a $1.00 tipping fee per ton for all cities within the County for Waste Ch2rertgry'za}inn sp~.iios. T!.9_g ,,,,,, „c;c intended to be used by cities for the preparation of the AB 939~~Elements which include waste characterization studies as a component of the Elements. SCS Engineers requested the individual cities for the West End Coalition pay a supplemental amount of $40,556 for additional work requested by the West End Coalition. Rancho Cuamonga's share of this cost is $8,240. The West End Coalition also requested SCS Engineers provide additional detail to their supplemental funding request and that information is attached for your review along with SCS's original request for supplemental funding. As indicated, all of the additional information requested by SCS was incorporated in the Final Report for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and does meet the State mandated requirements of AB 939. spectfull Submitted, one O'Ne anagement Analyst 11 Attachments: SCS Memorandum dated August 2, 1992 Requesting Supplemental Funding SCS Memorandum dated September 5, 1991 Responding to Additional Information Requested by West End Coalition 33 August 2, 1991 ~~4 File No. 900004.01 TO: Martin Pastucha, Diane O'Neal, Marcia Godwin, Antoinette Foti, Harold Duffy l,1 FM: Mar Ipers and Ivan Braun RE: Request for Supplemental Funding t~ Complete AB 939 Plans This memo is a follow-up to phone conversations this week that advised you of several budget issues that have arisen in preparing the AB 939 plans for the West Valley Coalition. As a result of these issues and based on the rate of expenditures to date, it does not appear possible to complete these plans within budget. As explained below, the circumstances which led to increased work were basically beyond our control. By themselves, none of these items were "budget busters" but cumulatively they've had a major effect. Up until now we were hopeful that we could achieve savings elsewhere in the budget to cover these increased costs and to avoid this request for additional funding. SCS sincerely regrets having to make this request. As detailed below, however, we feel that the nature of the circumstances that led to increased expenditures is justifiable and that our request is valid. The reasons and amount of the overruns are described below as they effecC all jurisdictions. Preoaration of Household Ha ardous Waste IHHWI Element When the contract was negotiated, all five jurisdictions requested that we scale back our budgets covering the preparation of the HHW Component of the SRRE. Based on our understanding of the regulations at that time, we felt confident that we could reduce the budgets for this item and still comply with the guidelines. Since then, new legislation was enacted by the State upgrading the status of the HHW section to that of an Element. The State 3~ fees br prnre55 ona~ serrces are hue anc payaoie upon receipt or mv4Ke $ermCe crarges cpmpuleC a1 a rate of I ~; per mprlP r,' Re .r.-. Da~an<e ~'B4 pe' ,ear. mu ea aepeC to au acc0un15 b, wnrcn roll payment is np; rece vea wimn 3C Cavs e' invoice pa:a MEMORANDUM AUG ~ 5 1991 Memo to West Valley Coalition August 2, 1991 Page 2 guidelines to prepare these elements only became available in late March. Based on these guidelines and the level of effort to date, it appears that it will cost 510,000 per jurisdiction (except Montclair where the estimated total Cost is 56,0001 to complete these elements. Taking into account the amounts originally budgeted to complete this task, the additional funds requested for this item are as follows: • Upland 56252 • Rancho 55540 • Chino 56252 • Montclair 55612 • Unincorporated 55540 2. Conduct additional waste diversion analvsis. After the initial meeting with the City of Ontario where Ontario presented the results of their waste diversion survey, the group requested that we go back and check our contacts with local recycling centers and perform additional analysis to quantify existing diversion levels. This effort was successful, increasing the amount diversion documented in all jurisdictions except Chino. In documenting diversion up until that date, SCS completed what we considered to be the level of effort required under the terms of the contract. We conducted additional analysis in accordance with your request. As indicated above, we would not normally request additional funds far this item except that it waS not possible to achieve savings on project budgets elsewhere. It is estimated that it cost 52000 per jurisdiction to conduct this work (except for unincorporated San Bernardino County for which the diversion work was completed within the original budged. 3. Conduct Self-Haul Survey. Incorporate Results into Waste Generation Studies At a meeting a couple months ago, all flue jurisdictions and Ontario authorized SCS to conduct a survey of self-haul loads at the Milliken Landfill. After that meeting, each jurisdiction authorized an additional 5300 to complete this surveY• This authorization was not based on any proposal or cost estimate supplied by $CS. After that meeting 3-~~ Memo to West Valley Coalition August 2, 1991 Page 3 0 we developed a survey protocol and made arrangements to conduct the survey. Charges for the self-haul survey have not been totaled, however it is anticipated that the total cost of this survey will be approximately 53000 (5500 per jurisdictionl. The additional cost of 5200 per jurisdiction is not really the issue. It is anticipated that incorporating the results of the self-haul survey into the solid waste generation component of the SRREs and modifying the technical appendix which documents the full results of the solid waste generation studies will cost approximately S2500 (S500 per jurisdictionl• When the costs above are totaled, we are requesting that the contract to increase the authorization levels by the following amounts: • Upland S 8952 • Rancho S 8240 • Chino S 8912 • Montclair S 8312 • Unincorporated S 6140 This would amount to an increase of S40,556 from the original contract amount, Please note that other considerations have also increased costs, most notably attendance at meetings (coordination meetings, meetings with staff regarding individual components, etcl. Since the contract does not specify the number of staff meetings we would attend we are not requesting additional compensation to cover these costs. We have made every effort to be accessible to all jurisdictions throughout the process and intend tc continue this policy. Throughout this planning process, SCS has made every effort to be responsive to all the cities and the County. We are currently at the point where the plan preparation is nearly complete and the public review period will begin, Although we regret having to request additional funds, we feel strongly that our request is justified. We request your favorable consideration as soon as possible. Please call us if you have any questions, 3(r, September 5, 1991 File No. 0190190.00 Mr. Martin Pastucha integrated Weste Manager General Services Oepartmer.t City of Upland 1370 N. Benson Avenue Upland, California 91786 Peat-It` Grand fax trensmiltal mertw 7671 r apgw ~ S 0, epl. one r Ci ii ~! H r RE: Response to Vour Request for Additional Information Regarding Work Completed on West Valley Coalition AB 939 Project Dear Martin: SCS Engineers ISC51 is happy to respond to your request for additional financial information in your letter of August t4, 1991. The responses below have been constructed from timesheets, past invoices, and the records of staff which has participated on the project. So that it is Clear what issue we are responding to, your request is presented ~n boldface followed by the information which responds to your request. The previous SCS request indicated the compensation needed to remedy three overruns, but did not indicate how msny hours were required by job classification. This information should ba broken down by jurisdict(on. Please see attached Tables 1 through 5 which show the addiuonel costs incurred for each jurisdiction to prepare the HHW Elements, to document additional waste diversion, and to complete and ineorporate the self-haul survey into the waste generation study. 2. The Jursldictions request a recap on whet has spent to date on the proJset by subtask, position classification. suhconsultants, end reimhurseables. Our formal accounting procedures for these projects ware not set up to keep track of expenditures by subtask; the contract does not require this type of bookkeeping. However, based on en extensive review of [lino sheets, project detail reports, and employees individual logs wa have developed a serves of Tables IB through 101 which compare the actual jaccruedl hours end dollars per task to the estimated hours and dollars shown in the p.`r~--, r,a-:y„o1:~ •ee...< "OC.:o .u:n,,.~t•C Wcs-,n~.wi:C Yx9 3~ 03i09i92 14:29 'a`3104270a05 SC.S ENGINEERS --- RANCHO CUCAMONGA fm a02 r Mr. Martin Pastucha September 5, 1991 Page Z CdnlraCt. In reviewing the tables please note that the fallowing: • The estimated hours are taken directly from the spreadsheets appended to the contract. • In many instances, we have accrued substantially more hours than estimated without encountering budget problems either because other direct costs IODCsI were less than anticipared and/or because work was billed at different rates than anticipated in the budget. • There may be slight descrepancies between the number of accrued hours shown in the spreadshee[ with those which can be totaled from past invoices. The invoices are accurate; th6 totals shown in the spreadsheets are estimates based on data from prolect detail reports for July to which some changes are sill being made. • The estimated dollars per task in the contract do not reflect the 15% administrative fee assessed with all other direct costs IODCsI. Therefore, the ODC portion of the cost per task has been increased by 15% over what is shown in the contract in the column called "estimated dollars" in the accompanying tables. • The accrued dollars per task reflect SCS labor and all reimuburseables including work completed by subcontractors. • Both major subcontractors an this project, EBA and 3R, have invoiced us within a hundred dollars per jurisdiction of their limits. In addition to the breakdown in Item p1 (aboval. It wss felt that a detailed explanation is needed for how much time was spent on the HHWE, and what requires the edditio:tal 46600.6500 par jurladlcilon. A breakdown by the number of hours spent for each teak by clsaslficaUon would alto ba appreciated. 2~ 03/09/92 14'29 S31 b4270805 SCS ENGINEERS Mr. Martin Pastucha September 5, 1991 Page 3 -^- RANCHO CUCAMONGA ®003 preparation pf the HH~YE by subtask. Based on the records of participating staff, Tables 1-5 provide a good approximation of what level of staff effort, above that originally estimated, was necessary to complete the HHWEs. These tables also reflect our best estimate of the proportion of time spent by personnel in each job classification. As intlicated m our previous letter, the reason HHWE expenses were far in excess of anticipated expenditures is because the requirements for preparation of a HHWE are substantially different than [he requirements for preparing a HHW Component as part of a SRRE. We initially viewed the HHWE as a relatively simple 8.10 page chapter, prepared in the same format as the other SRRE diversion components, which essentially indicated that the Cities have Chosen to participate in the county program. The actual product is a small document with a somewhat more complex structure which has been supplemented to present an analysis of a set of required alternatives. I apologize for not bringing these concerns to you attention sooner. As I intlicated previously, the intent was to achieve savings elsewhere so we did not have to burden you with a request for additional funds. 1 sincerely hope that the enclosed information is sufficient to address the concerns in your previous letter. If not, please let me know. Sinc~erely~i, Mark D. Alpers Project Manager SCS Engineers cc. Diane O'Neil Marcia Godwin Antoinette Foti Harold Duffy 3~ Enclosures (10) 03i09i92 1930 03104270805 SCS ENGINEERS --- RANCHO CVCAMONCA ®00q r Tablo 1. Supplemental Fuadiag ReQotat Cily of Raocbo Cucamonga Hnors by Taak Number Toul Prolect Director .. 0 0 2 132 5264 Prolect MEr'Admin a 4 0 S % 5768 Prolect Engineer 4U 0 5 45 70 53,150 Snfl Engineer IO 22 0 32 W 51.920 Tech. Editur IG 2 0 I8 65 Slt1U Secrenrial I6 4 0 20 32 5640 Nu~u rY by TaSY $g 72 ~ $ ~ ~~ I $ . 'I Suhenol (~ S5 2&1 51 922 5350 _ 57.552'1 Otbef Direct Coats 1 2 3 Tony Mileage Il 0 V 0 Reproduction 125 0 U 125 TNephonc 50 100 SO 20D FAX 50 0 0 50 Micrnrnmpumr 35 2U 0 SS •SUbtonl ODC 5260 Si ZO - 0 S{30 ~~ S$ ~ Subrotal~~y Task S 510 52,042 _ SI00~ ~ Subtoul OOC SJ70 Admih. ((5%ODC) 565 Taak Numbcn •od Namea l 6nnd Tool fR 7~ 1. Prepare Houachnld Haz Waste Blcmcnt 2. Complete Wasn Divcrswn Sludy 7. Sell-Haul Sorvey ~~ 03i05i92 14'30 $3{04270805 y SCS ENGINEERS --- RANCHO CUCANONCA 0005 Table 6 Rancho Cucamovga AD 939 9udget Sinus Through 8/IN1 E<limared Accrued Ealimule0 Aeefued ',Tait Hours Hburs Dollars Dollars, Proiccl Maoagemem ~ 52'I 55 ~ 55,114' 53.405 Was[e Ocncralino Sludiex 308 i ?Btf ~ 32Y 18(.~ S_31, Source Reduniuo Compnnem 30 3S' Sg.7Ot~ Sg.400 Q') Recycling Component 56 ~ ~ 651 59,01) Sg,215 ~'('} Composting Compoocbt ^ ~~_ SO 57,667. S7.i00 Q•) ~ ~ Special Waxrc component 51~ f Ad7 52200; ' HHW Component ~_, 56~ 144; Sd,J81 StD.ftt0 Public Ed do/Info ~_ IN 301_ 59}37 58.555J(•) Funding Component 411' S6 5R,2v3 , _ SG.000 (•) Solid Waste Facilities .30 63 ~, $3,gi4S 53.000 - Plao Iowgralinn ~2' 91 ~~ 55373 5),bIS ... ' CPQA fi0 0. ...$4,21._ S0~ _ _ Total ~ S?2 1045 i SY9,9U 591,995 Notes: t. Tasks shown with (•) indicate those where suhcontracmrs (EBA and?R) hate generated produce. Subcontractors have billetl up to their allolmems. 2. Hnuns per msk arc as shown in contract. }. Ovc[head portion of Uullun per task has been increased by 155, io reflect administradst costa worth are not shown nn per cost basis in the contdci. II --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Sack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Karen tlcGUire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM 1989/1990 ROEERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,470 TO THE BASKETBALL HARDCOURT RETROFIT PROJECT RBCOMMSNDATIOR It is the recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission that City Council authorize the transfer of $34,470 from the 89-90 Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Grant to the Basketball Hardcourt Retrofit Project. HACROROOliD In 1990, the City requested, end was awarded, $36,670 £rom the 1989-1990 Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Grant program for acquisition of parkland in Southwest Cucamonga. Staff researched potentially suitable land in that area and located ane available parcel approximately 9 acres in size which was appraised at $1,815,000. Given the state of the economy, there have been no additional funds available to set aside for acquisition purposes and there may not be for some time. This project grant expires in June 1994, however, the state grant representative has given preliminary approval to transfer those funds to another project based on Council's authorization. Staff recommended to the Park and Recreation Commission, at their February 20, 1992 meeting, that the grant money be transferred to the Basketball Hardcourt Retrofit Project to augment available funds. The Park & Recreation Commission agreed and Purther recommended that env remaining funds be ue~ed to add additional picnic tables to existing park sites. Director ko CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director SUBJECT: REQUEST BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO WAIVE CITY FEES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ANNUAL BUSINESS & COMMUHZTY EXPO RBCOMMEMDATION Staff recommends the waiving oP City fees in conjunction wlth the annual Chamber of Commerce Business 6 Community Expo. BACxoRDUND The City has received its annual request from Danielle Watson, Executive Director, Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, to waive Ciiy fees in connection with the Buslnase 6 Community Expo to be held on May 15 and 16 at the Terra Vista Town Center (see attached letter). The specific fees Lo be waived era as follows: Business License .......................$2,080.00 Building & Safety ......................$ 48.50 Planning ...............................$ 68.00 Fire District ..........................5 260.00 TOTAL $2,456.50 I RC ta±a~ MB~CMMEkCE TEL~714-937-591? Feb 25.92 11:55 No.003 P.02 ~_ Rancho Cucamonga _ ",'~ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE G February 25, 1992 Mr. Jack Lam City Manager City Mall Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FAX f 987-6099 Deer Jack: As you moat know, the rosiness c Community 6XP0 is once again approaching. This year, the event is scheduled for May 15 end 16, and will again be held at the Terra Vista Toan Center on the corner oP Maven and Foothill. Tne Chamber Ls requeatinq that all city fees be waived for the EXpO this year. This community event truly Ls a joint venture between the City and the Chamber of Coasee[os, ore that promoter not only the arse's business climate, but the City o! Rancho Cucamonga, ae well. The chamber is offering six booths plus outside display area Por large equipment to the CLty again this year at no cost. Your aeeletance in thin matter would be greatly appreoiated. If this proposal is agreeable with tae city officials, please contact me at the Chambet as soon as possible. Slncerely,~ p~~ I Danielle Watson Executive Director DWttfl ~F~' 8280 UTICA AVENUE SU17E 180 • RANCHO CUCAMONCiq CALIFORNIA 01730 • T74 / 087.1014 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mdr Ch 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and Memb9 ra of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manages FRJM: Bzad Buller, City Planner By: Stott Murphy, Associate SU&TECT: RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR ENVIRONM.EHTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-20 - SHELL OIL - A request to eatahlieh a gat station, mini-market, and car wash on a 1.31 acre parcel in the medium rtes dential dell gnation (s- ib dwelling unite per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road end Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. A~DMIq Staff recommends that the Clty Council approve Conditional U9e Permit 91-20 through adoption of the attached Resolution and Sseue a mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. BACfL7bHIN On March 4, 1992, the City Council conducted a public hearing on an appeal of the proposed service station facility. After receiving all public testimony on the application, the City Council wted to uphold the appeal of the app Licent and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval. Because of croncerns expressed with the nolee generated by the car wash, the City Council directed staff to Snclude a condition that restricted [he hours of operation Prom 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM. This condition hat been included in the Resolution for your review and approval. Res f ly sub Brad r City P nner BB:SM: ap Attachments: Aeaolution of Approval RESOLUTION N0. y~ - V 11~ O o A RESOLUTION O£ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE pEFMIT 97-2D, A REQUEST TO fiSTABLISH A GAS STATION, MINI-MARKET, AND CAR WASH ON A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (5-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RASE LINE ROAR AND ROCHESTER AVENUEr AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-751-17 A. Recitals. (i) She11 oil has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Vse Permit No. 91-20 as deacrl6ed in the title of this Resolution. Hereafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional U9e Permit shall be referred to ee "the application." (ii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning comma scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and continued said hearing to allow t:r•e development plane to be resubmitted for additional review by the Design Review Commiiiee. (111) On December 77, 7991, the Planning Commission conducted a duty noticed public hearing to receive written and oral teaiimony on the proposed application. Said public hearing was continued to January R, 1992. (iv) On January e, 1992, the Planning CoamLLaeion received additional public testimony on said application and concluded the public heazing on this date. The Planning Commission directed that a Reao lotion of Den!al be prepared for the January 22, 1992 meeting. (v) On January 22, 1992, The Planning Comml9sion adopted its Re so lotion No. 92-10, thereby denying the application. (vi) On January 25, 1992, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission's decision within the time limits Freecribed by law. (vii) On March 4, 1992, the City Covncll conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application end concluded said hearing on [hat date. (viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREPORE, St Ss hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby apacifical ly finds that ell of the facts eat forth in the Recitals, Pazt A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 1 CITY COVNC IL AESOLUTI ON NO• CUP 91-20 - SHELL OIL March 1H, 1992 Page 2 r 2. eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above referenced public hearings on March 4, 7992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of ease Line Aoad and Rochester Avenue With a street frontage of 250 feet along ease Line Road and 174 feet along Rochester Avenue. The parcel Ss presently vacant; and fb) The property to the north and east are zoned for and being developed with single Family residences. The property to the south and west is zoned for multi-family units and is vacant; and (c) Under the Terra Vista Community Plan, service stations and related uses (mini-markets and car washes) are defined ae "Community Facilities" and are permitted in any zoning designation along the major arterials (ease Line, Rochester, Milliken, and Foothill) subject to the review and approval of a Conditional Uae Permit; and (d) The propose 1, with the recommended conditions of approval, is in Conformance with the minimum 9tandarde of the Terra Vista Community Plan, the Development Code, and the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as tollowa: (a) That the proposed use Sa in accord wl th the General plan, the objectives of the Terra vista Community Plen and Development Code, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not b: detrimental to the public health, safety or we lEarer or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Development Code. 4. This Council hereby finds and certif Lea that the project has 6e en reviewed and considered Sn comp l.Sence with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, Further, this Council hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. eased upon the findings and conclueiona set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject Lo each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Con di [ions attnched hereto and incorporated by this reference. ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLDTION N0. CUP 91-20 - SHELL OIL Mazch 1s, 1992 Page 3 r Planning Divlaion 1) A 50-foot, non-buildable easement shall be recorded ae a buffer on the adjacent property to the eoath ana west. The easement shall prohibit the placement of residential (habitable) unite within the easement area. Accea eory structures (i. e. detached garage a, kiosks, etc.) may be permitted within the easement area. T}te easement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits for either project site. 2) A minimum 25-foot landscape setbeek shall Ee provided as a buffer on the adjacent property to the south and wee t. The plans shell be revleved and approved by the Planning Commission at the time of review of the related project. 3) Revised architectural plane shell be submitted for review end approval by Lhe Design Review Committee prior to the iseuence of building permits. At a minimum, the plane shall include the Po11ow1ng: a. The canopy colunma shall be redesigned to he in proportion with the canopy. b. The gable poprout roof elements shell be redesigned to provide a more integrated roof design. c. The storefront elevation shall be redesigned to eliminate the ghee at the bottom portion of the elevation to screen merchandise that may be stacked against the window. d. A more durable materiel (i. e., ceramic tile) shall be used et the base of the c0lumn9 t0 miniml2e lama ga. e. The building shell be designed with sufficient roof overhang or gutters to prevent aster free running down the aide of the building and staining the walla. 4) Graffi tl shall be removed within 24 hours. ~8 CITY COUNCIL RBSOLOTION N0. COP 91-20 - SHELL OIL March 18, 1992 Page 4 5) The entire Bite shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and, in no event, shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 6) All trash enclosures and receptac lea shall be designed io incorporate the folloring design features to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a. Architecturally Integrated into the design of the aerv7 ce station. 6. ^cr the large enclosure, separate pedestrian access, including a aelf- cloeing door, that does not require opening of the main doors. c. Roll-up overhead door. d. Trash bin with counter-weighted lid. e. Architecturally integrated overhand trellis. f. Chain link screen on Lop of the enclosure to prevent fresh from blaring out of the enclosure. The chain link shall be hidden from view. 7) The hours of operation for the car rash shall he from 5:00 a. m. to 11:00 p.m., seven days a week. H) Exterior public telephones shell 6e prohibited within the site. 9) A final lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City planner and Police Department prior to the isaunnce of building permits. The plan shall identify footcendle Ll lamination rithin the sits and on adjacent properties. The overspill onto adjacent properties shall not exceed Eive footcandles. Additionally, the lighting shall be designed to minimize glare onto adjacent properti ea through the type and design of light fixtures and/or elteretione to the building design to project light doom onto the sigh[ rather than out onto adjoining properties. ~q CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. CUP 91-20 - SNELL OIL March iB, 1992 Page 5 10; The vacuums shall be relocated away From the south and west property line. The final location shall be approved by the City Planner prior to the iaeuance of building permits. 11) The final landscape and irrigation Diana shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits and shall include the Following: a. Extensive an-site landscaping, including evergreen trees, shall be provided along the west and south property boundaries to buffer the service atntion from the potential residential unite. b. Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the Ease Line and Rochester street frontages to screen the pump islands and cat wash drive aisles from public view. 72) video surveillance camerae shall De installed on the Bite to provlfle security for the facility. 13) A comprehensive sSgnage program shall be prepared for the service atntion in compliance with the Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinnnce. The program shall provide for the design and location of permanent ai 9ne and any potential temporary signs. The program shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the iaeuance of building parmita. Engineering Division 1) Overhead Utilities a. Ease Line Aoed; An in-lieu fee ae a contribution to the previously undergrounded utilities (e lectricel and telecommunication) on the opposite aide of Ease Line shall be paid to the City prior to the iaeuance of but ldlnq permits. The fee shall be one-half the city adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Rochester Avenue to the west project boundary. b. Rochester Avenues An in-lieu fee ae a contribution to the future undergrounding oC existing overhead uti lltlee (electricnl u ~~ CITY CONIC IL RESOLUTION N0. CUP 91-2a ~- SNELL OIL Marsh ta, 1992 Page 6 and telecommunications, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a building permit. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Hese Line Road to the south project boundary. 2) Acquire necessary right-of-way and construct Acchestez Avenue full width from ease tine Road to Church Street. Off-site sidewalk and street trees may be deferred until the development of the adjacent propertied. The developer may request a reimbursement ' agreement to recover the coat of constructing off-91te sires[ improvements from future development as it occurs. This condition may be modified/removed ae necessary to conform to the conditions imposed upon related Tentative Parcel Map 13987. 3) Conatzuc! the portion of the Terra Vi eta community Meater planned Storm grain System No. 6 (lines 6 and 6-i) from this site to Day Creek Channel. If the project is to be constructed prior to the completion of the Day Creek Channel, provide a retention facility to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This condition may be modified/removed ae necessary to conform to the candi [ions imposed upon related Tentative Parcel Map 13987. d) The Terra Vista Community entry monument, if constructed, shall he maintained by the developer. 6) Install the Base Line Aoad median landacnping from Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue. 6. This Council hereby provided notice to Shell O11 Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought le governed by the provi siona of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1a9A.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City cE Rancho Cucamonga Se hereby directed to; (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwf th transmit a certified copy of ehia Reao lotion, by certified mail, return-receipt roqueeted, to Shall 011 Company at the eddreas identified in City records. 'J' ~,gn ®~ DEPARTMENT OF ~a~~~®~~~~~~~~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: /LG~'//GW.9L ~~5~~~++"~ r F M~~ 9/-2O SUB.IECT: U.AS S,'Fjlq•y c/+.F W~sEfL/,. ~N/~ /~I~' ~.T APPLICANT: '~ D/L {{~~ LOCATION: _ =SWC .F~~~~ ~ ~wC//ECSr~2 Those items chetlced are CondNbra d Approval APPUCANT SNALL CONTACT THE PLANNING ONISION, (714) aEF/tMl, FOR COMPLIANCE WRH THE FOLLOWING CONOtipN3: A. Time Umla / 1. A{preval sMN expiro, unless extended W iM PWat#p Commlseion, N buedklg pemNW are not issued orapprovetluae 1186 r10i COrrxrterlCBd WNttb 24 moroM Irom tM Oete a approval. 2. DevebpmersJDeegn Revlaw eMN M approved prbr b ~_. 3. Approval of TentatNe Tract No. b posed augect b tM appoval a a. ThedevebpersMACOmmsnp,pidbipMeln,andmnwmnasacausebbecommenced. penicipeted in, or cortaUmnnad, a MelbHaos CerlararrlAy FadMMa DIeMq (CFD) for the Rarx:tro Cucamatpa FMe Prdeabn DltWla to nrlarlce ooretnwtbn anaa maseertance of a flro stafbn to serve IM deveb(NM1a. The atatbn ehaN W basted, designed, and huNl ro aN specAicatiam d tM RarICM Cucamonga Fin Prdegbn DNlrip, and ehaN IMCdrrIB tM (Netricl'a PrWsnY upon aonpMion. TM equipnnN afrall W selected M tM Dbhip in aoeordance wAn As rrexM. in arty lwNd#rp a a station, iM dwebper afwN comply with all appicads laws and roguletbns. TM CFD shah De betted tsy iM Dbtrbl and the devebper b7 the lime ncordatbn d IM noel map Dawn. 5. Prbr to recordatbn d tM flnN map or tM Iseuartce d huatlNtp psmata, whbf!evsr comas lirot, the applbaM sltaN contM to, or partbgats h, dte settlDWlartsnl d a MaNo-licos Community FaCNNbe Dlnkkx br Ure a1MlruCibn and nrdnNnance a rtecetury sCIt001 facNAba. Fbwever, A arty Edgdl dbblp has prevbusly estebNehed auto a ComrrxtnNy FadNlies District, lM appMcaro ehaN, in tM aaemallw, oortaertt b tM aratexmfon a tM Woled silo into iM temrory d auto exletlrtp DMMq prbr to tM reoordatbn d tM Ibel map or iM issuance a oaNdirtp pemNls, whbttevar coma Iirel. Further, N 1M afleaad eClgol dadrkl has not lorrrted a MsNo-ROOe Comnatity FadNINs Dielrbt wNlan twelve moMM from tM date of approval d iM project and poor to tM rscarddbn d tM final map or issuance a twilling penrtNs for said Drolea, thla cortdilbn aMN M deemed rarN and void. Ar J~- J~_ ~_J- --' _J- ~~_ sc ~ are i t or f ~ rm~.o ~'up9/po L+IaWrs~Lha. This condaion shall he waivnd'd the Cay receives notke that the applicant and all affected sclrooi districts have emered Ntto an agreement to privately accomrtndate any arW all sctaol impacts as a resup of this project. ~_ 6. Prior to recordatbn of the final map or prbr to issuance of lwibing pennps when ro map is irnolved, wdtlen ceAHication from the spatted water WMrbl that adequate sewer and water facilaies are or will be avaNable to serve the proposed project Shah be submitted to the Department of Comnunay Devebpmm. Such letter must have Deen issued by the water tlistrictwahin 90dayspriortofinal mapapprovalinttta caseot subdivisbn orprbrto issuance of pemYls in the case of a7 other residamial projects. 8. SHe DevebplrlMt 1. the sae shall be devebped and maintained in aooortlarrce with the approved plans whbh incbde site plans, archaectural rNevatiom, extedor materials and cobra, larrdscapfnp, sgn Program, artl gratlirtp on fib in the PtanMng Divbbn, the contlpbm mraauad herein, Devebpmem Catle regulation, arM Spedfk Plan and 7E.[44 //cD^.f Plannetl Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project spa or busNtees actNily nNq oorrvrrenced thereon, all CondHion OI Approval shop l>e completed b the SetlelBClbn of the CNy Plerater. 3. Occupancy of the faafay shep reel cormrrettce u roN arctt tbte ae all Unportn Bui bN1g Code and State Flre Marohap'e regUlatlorrs have bean r7ontplisd wph. Prbr to occywncy, plan shop tx submitted to tM Rancho l,ucertarrpa Flro Prdsrybrt DbtrlG and tM Buildup and Salary Divisbn to ffiaw compNence. The WildNtp shop G impeded for wrrplianca prior ro oauparwy. a. Revised see pWn and buildirq elevetbrro Ntcorporatinq eM Conditbm d Approval shah be submitted for City Ptanmr review artd approval prbr 10 heUBrIM of btladirp pemtila. / 5. All sae, gratling,landscape, imfpalbn,eM Street krprovertrsroptam shop pe coordinated for comistency pdorto issuarwx of any psmrpro (each as gra0klp, tree removal, encroacMneM. OuildNq ,etc.), or prbr to fatal map approval In the cue of a rarotom bt subdhrisbn, or approvrM use has commenced, whbtrever mrrrea /Nat. / 8. Approval of Ma request shall rat waive comppanoe wph all sacllom of IM Devebprmm Code, aH other appNcabb Cpy OrdNtaraes, and applicabN Commudry Plane or Spedlk PWn in eflect at the 1Nm of BuNdlrp Permp leeuartce. / 7. A dataaed on-sps Nghllrp plan chap bs ravNnred arttl approved by tM CNy Planmr and SherMYS DepaMMrtl (989-BBt 1) prbr to the Nlauana o1 buildutq pernlih. Such plan shall indicate style. ipurMnatbn, bcatlon, freight, and rmthod d slrleburp eo ae rat to adversely allect adjacaro propenbs. 8. If ra CernrellzrW trash receplacbe aro Ixovfded, aN trash pkkap shall ba for IrMivklual unas wNh aN recepar;les shieWeOlrom pubpc view. / 9. Trash receptaclelsl aro rsquNed and a1wN meet CNy etarlderds. The final tlsspn, bcatbn, and Me number d trash reaptaclea shell bs subject b CMy Plaratsr review and approvsl prbr to issuance of dlilONtg psrrtpls. _/ f 0. ANground-mounted uNley appurtemrtces ouch ae tranefomnere, AC condemere, etc., shall be bated out o1 publk view and adequately uroaned through the uea of a combinatbn of concrete or masonry walla, Darmirtp, artCror kndecapMq to Ins satislad'an of the Cay Planner. r J-1- J-J ~J- J-J_ JJ- J-J- J_J_ ~~- ~J_ J-/- ~~- 9C .7/91 7 or 17 P~mvo Cav 9/aa ~~ a~ 17. Sheet names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance wNh JJ the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the linal map. - 12. AN Ouibag numbers and lydlvidual units shall oe identNied in a clear and concise manner, JJ_ including proper illuminatbn. t 3. A detailed pWn indicating traN widths, maxirtum sbpea, physical condNbrts, fertdng, and weed control, b accordance with City Master TreN drawings, mall be 5ubrniRBd br CNy _/J_ Plannerreview ant approval prbrloappm4~al and reoortlatbnoNhe Final Trail Map and prior to approval of street irnprovemeM and greWng plans. DevebpershaN upgrade and construct aN treib, including fencing and drainage devkes, in conjurtctbn wNh street intprovemeMS. 14. The Covenants, Condpbns and Restrfctbns(CCBRs)sneN nil prohNNt itte keepingof equine _/_J_ animalswtterazonirgnequirements Ialhe keepkg W said aMmals nave been met.lydividual bt ownere in suhdivisbrts snap have the option of keepkgsaid animab wNhout IM rtecassily of appealing to boards of dkrx;tors or ttomeownere' associalbrts for amerrdnneras to the CC&RS. 15. The Covenants, CondNbre, and Restrktbns (CCBRS) aril Araclea M Inoorporeibn of the J. / Homeowners' Associa[bn are suttjea ro ale approval d the fzlalrwg and Enyneerirg _ _ Divisbns and the Cpy Aaomey. Tney snaN be recanted owtarmeMly wXh ate Flnal Map or prior to the Issuance d Dupdrg permila, wtechever oocure ikat. A recorded Dopy aheH co provided to the CNy Entgktesr. ~t6. Allparkways, open ereaa,andlardscapkg shah De pernwrtentfy makaaktsd bylftepmperry J_/ owner, Itonteownere' aeaxiaion, or dnx means acosptable to the CNy. Proof of Mis _ landscape maNaenarlce shah De subrttiaed for CNy PWrxter and Clly Engineer review and approval pMr ro issuance d buNGnp psrmMS. t 7. Solar access easements shaA be dedicated for ifrs purpose 01 aesunwg that each lot or J___/_ dwelling unN ahaN have tlw rpM b receNa suneght across ad)aCeM lute or unps br use of a solaranergy system. Ths sesementa may be coMaktW b e Decleretion of Reetrktbns for tfta atrbdviabn whbh mall be recorded cortcurrsntly wflh ant racordatbn of tM flnW map or issuance of pemkls, wltichswr comes brat. The eaeemente shah proniLN the casikg of shadows by vegetatbn, etructurea, f6durae or arty Dater ab)sa, excsq for u1NNy wiroa and simXar obiede, pursuant b Devebpmera Code Segbn 77.ga.060~(}z. 78. The Project coMatrro a desgneted HiMOrical Larfdrt7ark. The eNe snaN be developed and J_/_ maintained in arxwrdartu wNh the Hlstadc Lardmadc Alteration PemNl No. . Arty fanner modifications to tM site ktdudirg, but rtot Nmeed to, extsria aNeratbro ardor iMeridf aaeratbmwhbh easgths ederbrolthe buNdrgea etrtrcturea, rorttoval of landmark trees, demolNbn, rebcatbn, recorrotnwtbn of Ouildktpa or stnrdtrree, orchanges to the see, shah require a modilbatfon b Ins Historic Landmark ANeratbn Psmtit stlbjea to Historic Preservation Commaaion rWiew and appoval. C. Bullding Deslgn 1. An aaemative energy system is required ro provide domeatb Itot water for all dwelXrtq urge J.-/_ and br Iteaarg any awkMNrg pilot or spa, unNss outer aNerttatlva energy systems are demortetreled b be of equivabM capaCNy and eakderfcy. Ag swhtxNrq pools kalaNed at the time of IrMial dewbpmere ehsN a supplemented wIM solar heatkg. Delays ehaX De included in the buildNlp pone and shall De eutxnNled la CNy %anner review afd approval prior to the issuance of OUigirg pertnils. 2. AN dwellirge shall nave tnB front, Bide and rear ebvatbns upgraded wah architequral JJ_ Ireatmsnt, detailkg aril kbreaaed dslineatbn of surlace lroatmpM SuMect to CNy Planner ~ review and approval prior to iasuanca of buildkg pertnas. SC ~ 7/91 a of i 7 3. Standard patb wvar plans I« use by the Homeowners' Assaclatbn shah De subrtMted for City Planner and Buibirp Olhcial review and approval prbr to issuarbe of buildup permps. 4. Aq roof appunenerx»s, irrdud'mq au coMpbners and dher roof mourned equipmem arW/or projeabna, shall be shielded Irom view andthe sound 6ufferedlrom ad)acent propaNes and streets as required by the Plarninp DNisbn. Such scroemrp shall be ardvledurelty imegrated vdth the buildup design and mntdruded to the sanslaabn d the City Planner. Details shah be included in bUpoing plarre. D. Parking and vMku4r Access (Indkala tlatrdb on bWglnq plena) / 1. Ap parkirp bt landscape islands shag have a miNrlum odaide dimension of 81eet and shall comain a t2•Inch wok adjacem to the perkirp stall (Nrcktdrp curb). / 2. TexNred pedestrian patteraya all tebured pavameM across ckGllelbn slabs snap be providedthroupMulthe devebprnenlb connectdwepkpalurpglbuildkpswilhopenspaces/ plazas/reereatbnal uses. / 3. Ap parkirp spaces shay be doubb striped per Cpy atandaNe arrd aN driveway aisles, edrarbes, and exps chap be striped per Cpy sterxlame. 4, All unps stall b0 provided wph 9ara9e do« openers p driveways are lass titan iB led in depth from bads of sidewapc 5. The Covenants. CondtlonsanO Reetrictbrro chap rastrldtMst«apadn«eptbnal vshides on this spa unless they aro ins prbl9pal adurp d tramponatbn for d1e owner an0 prohbil parking on imerbr cuculatbn stales odlar than in depignded vlep« paMpp areas. 6. Plarm for arty aecurpy gates atWp ba subMlsd f« ill Cpy Planner, Cpy Erppleer, all Rarx~o Cucamorpa Firo Proterpbn Distrletrovbw and approval prbrpo lewanced buibirp permps. E. Landeuplnq (f« puDpey malmakted IaflMdape anau, Met to 8adlon N.) / 1. AdBlailed larWSCepe and krgatbnplan,IrtdudYtgsbpepiantlrpandmodalhonrelarxbcap- ing in ifre case d reabsmlBl devobpmenl, chap W prepared by a Ncense0 IandscAPe arclpleq and eubmMedlor l:py Kanner revlaw iudapproval prbrto iMkWarresd bupdup permits «pn« Iinel map apgwal In the case d a dmt«n bl ttubdlvlebn. 2. Existing trees regared l0 bs preserved in plea sleep bepgededwlMaooMlNdbn barrier in axordancswphthe Murlbpal Coda Ssdbn 19.08.110, and a notedontMpadngplaro. TM krCetbnd Bass trees ro be PreeenW in p4a and new bcatlorro 1«1rMeplantse trees shall bs shownonfha delaibdlarMscalls plans, The apppwasflapfapow apolhe arbodst's recommendalbrts regardup praservalbn, Vansplarppq and Inmmptp mNMds. I. Aminimumd_troaspergrossaas,corrgrlesddMSfopowingaixse,shopDSprovlded wphin the project: % • I8-inch box «larger, %• 38- kldl box «Wrger, %- 21• inch boz «gryx, _ % • 15yap«t, and _ % • 5 gallon. / 4. A minimum d U~ % 01 trees plarpad within the proud shop bs ppecimen sire trees 24-indl boz «lafger. / 5. Within parking kNS, tress shpll bs planted >t a rata d one t Syalbn Iree for every three parkirp stalk, sullbbm to enacts 50% d the parkirp ana at soNr moon M AUQYei 21. e~~a: C.~a9/2o ~,,,dmu, o.m~ J__J_ JJ_ _/-!_ J-/- -/J_ JJ- JJ- J-!~ JJ- J___/_ J~_ J-/- JJ- 9C - 2/B I { or 11 6. Trees shall be darNed in areas olpuWb view aojacent to and abng structuresata rate of one tree per 30 Nnear last of Bribing. 7. AN private sbpe barecs5leet orbs in veAicalMgM and ol5:i orgreaer5bpe,twtlesathan 2:7 abpe, short be, al minimum, inigaed and IaMSeaped wen appropdae ground cover for eroson control, Sbpe planting required by thla section sMll irtchrde a permeneM krgabn system ro M irtaalled by Me dewbper prpr ro ocarpanty. ~ 8. All -_ Privatesbpeainezcessa5lea,bulkrssthan8leet inveAicalheiphlanda2:lorgreater sbpe shaA be larttlscapad and IrtN~atedior erosion control and to soRen tMkappearrtce as folbws: one 15yalbn or Wrgeraae trN per each 150 sq. R. of abPe area,lgalbn or larger sae slwubpereacn 700 aq. R. a sbpe area, and appropriate ground cover. In addNbn, sbpe Dartks in excess of B lea b vertical ItelgM arM a 2:1 or greater abpe anal) also include one Syalbn or larger sae tree per each 250 aq. h. a sbpe area. Trees and shn7ba shall be darted in staggered cY7stera b aoRen and vary abpe darts. Sbpe dantk7g required by this section sttaA k7ck7dB a pertnanant irrgation system b i>0 instaaed by tM devebpar prbr b accuParz.Y• 9. For sirrpb lamiy residentlal devebpmaM, aA slope plarNYtg and irApalorl shop be Continu• oust' makaaktsd kt a Maatry endNAvirgeoMitbn b1'tM dewktper untA eacn ktdivldual unp is sold andoaarpbd by iM a,yer. Prbrto roMaeingooarpancylortMae unaa, an irnpanbn Shah be conducted by iM P18ratir7g DWiakm to deterrrNr7e ihM they aro in setlalaaory coMitbn. 10. For rtNNFlamily residential and rtor7-reeiderrlia devebpmenl, prolrsdy ownero are reapon• sole for tM continua maintsrwbe d aN IaMxePed areas on-alts, o• weN as coraiguoua planted areas wNhin the puab ApM•a-way, M landscaped arose at1aM OB kepi IfN Irom weeds arp debAa and mairNebed in a heaNhy artd IMvkp cor7dNlon, and shall receive reguWr prunktq, IeAilairtp, mowing, and trMrNrp. Arty damaged, dead, diesaaed, or decayktp plant materbl shall be redaced wNhb 30 days irorr7 the data d damage. 7 7. Fmnt Yard Wlldacapktq sMM ba required per tM D.vaopmero Codeand /or . This roquiromeM aMN M b addkbn to tM requked street trees and elope plarairrg. / 12. The final tlesgn a 1M psAmeta parkways, waAS, londacadrq, and aklewaAse shah M included b ti7s required landscape pWro artd snap M strb)ea b CNy Plaratsr revbw and approval and ccordktated broonsietsncy wNA arty parkway landecapkp plenwhbh mayM required by tM Enpk7NArtp Dlvleiort. / 13. Special landscape feaWrN prat ea mour7dNlp, aatrvial rack, epecartsn see trop, mNnder• irlp sidewaW (wi0t Mrlxonlal Chglga), and NasrroAied IargarAping, M roqukaO abrtp ,~SElWE .~i+~6 t~ .~.is-H~S1E~ lluE i E / t a. Landscaping and irtglNbn ayetertte rsquketl b W ir7aalNAwNhb tM ptrbAe ApMol•way on iM perknasr a iMe prokq aroa sMN be oorNiraauey maNnalrtetl by tM devebpsr. / tS. All walls shop Deprovkled wNhdawroNVa lroatmeM.Rbcatad bpubllc malntenBrlCe areas, iM design aheN be ooordNtaleO wNh IM EnpkteMrtp DYvktbn. 16. TrN mairNenancs crNaAa shop G dewbped and sttbrMRed br CNy PNraler review and at>Prowl pAOr b bauartcs a buildNtp psmNta. Tlteae allena snail ertcouraga ihs rtaturel growth dtaroaeAatics of iM tNNUad irN tgsscNe. / 77. lartdscapirtg and krgatbn aMN be dealgfMd 10 conserve water if71011gh IM PrNtelpba of Xenecapa as delined in Chapter 19.16 a iM Rancno Cucamorge Municipal Cade. PAm.o tua9/Z~ Csmdarm-Qra: JJ_ JJ_ JJ JJ JJ_ ~J- -/-/- J_I- ~-/- ~J- ~J_ SC - 4/91 S of 14 F. Sigrur 1. The Signs mdicatedon the wbmilted plans areconcepWalonlyarWnotapartol this approval. Arty sigrq proposed for this devebpment shall coney with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Divisbn prbtto installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Programlor Ws devebpmern shah De wbniaed IorCiry Planner review and approval prior to iswance of buikNng pemrNs. 3. Directory rtarwmem signtal shall be povided for apartmarn. oondomirtlum, or towntromes prior to ocwpancy arW shaA require Separate application and approval by the Planning Divisgn prior to ssuarra of buikflng permits, G. Envlronmentat t. Thadevebpersnaltprovide each prospective payer wdaen notice of the FOUnn Street Rods Crusher Proled in a staMard rortnat as aelem:ned by the CNy Planner, prbrto acceping a rasn deposN on arty PrePam. 2. The deveoper snail provide each prespeclNe buyer wrNlen notice d the CNy Adopted Special Stutlba Zone lot the Red HAI FauA, b a atartdaN format ae delertnkred by die Ciry Planner, Prior ro accegirtg a psh deposit on arty properly. 3. The developer shah provide each ProsPedive buyer wrNtan rgtbe d Ills FOOUNI Freeway Proled in a standard format as detemtirted by the City Plaratar, prior to acceptkq a cash depoaN on any progeny. 4. A final acoustical repoA snail be submiaed for C1ty Pterxror review arq approval prbr to the iswarlra of huildng permNS. The final report aflaA diewse the level d Yxerbr raise adenuationtoDebw45CNEL,tfrebuildktpmaterialsarM conslnwlbntedtrNquesprovided, andd appropiate, verify the adequacy dthe rrNligatbn meawros. The buNdng plans wNl be checked ror cornormance wNh the mlapadon measures cornained h ihs Ilnel report. M. Other AgsnelN 1. Emergency secondary acceae shaNbeprovided lnaooordancewah Rancho CUCamorge Fira Protedbn Disirid Standards. _2. Emergency acceassflellbe provided. maNttenarxx tree arMCbar,amNNmumo1281eetwide at aA Iimea during oorletrtrctbn in aocordartce wAh Rancho Cucenarpa Fire Preteclbn District raquirementE. 3. Prbr 10 IaaUartCa d Ouildklp garotte fdf combustible cortetnwtbn, eVWB11CB shall bB submatad to iM Rancho Cucamorpa Fire Proledbn Dkirkt that terrgorery water supply for lire protedbn b avaNabk, peixlkq compbtbn of taquked Ilre proledbn system. a. The appNrarn ahaA coMBCt the U. S. Foetal Servk:e b dstemNrta iM appropnete type and bcatbn of maN Dozes. MuaFlamNy rssidenAal devskrprnera6 sltWl provide a aoNd overfleatl stNCture for maN Dozes wNh atlsquata YghlNtg. The Ik1W bCalbn d tlM maN boxes and the deagn of ifM oventead etnklure ehaA bs > to CNy PAnner review arM approval prbr to the iaauarrce of buikkng pemlks. 5. For pro~ecro usirp septic tank IadNtba, wAltsn cenNicatbn of aoceptaDNAy, inckidirtp ell supportive irAormatbn, shag ba obtained Iron lira San SarnardMlo County Depanmern of EnYxonmernal Health and aubmNled to the Buildirlp OAictel prbr ro the issuarles of Septic TarW Pennils, and prbr ro beuartu of buNdkq partrWa. P~~.o C~/2G c..ti~„,., o.m~ ~-/_ J~_ JJ_ ~J_ _JJ_ JJ_ JJ_ _JJ- JJ- J~_ J___/_ JJ- sc ~ xtst cot is pAmve.d~ll/ r~a.~ APPLICANTS SNALL CONTACT THE BUAAING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989.1663, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: r 1. SNa DBVebprNm 1. 1Te applicant ehaNmrtgywNh the latest adopted UrMOrtn BUildirg Code, UnNOrtn Mechani- -J~- cal Code, UnNOrm PIunlDirp Code, Nalbnal EleGdc Code, and ad other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulatbns in elfed el the time of ieetlanCe of relaWe pemtNS. Please comas the Buildup and Salary Diviebn for copies of the Code Adoptbn Ordlnarice arW applicable handouts. 2. Prbr to iewance of buildup psmYls for a new reegentlal dweNUp uM(sl or major addNbn JJ- toexistuqunals), dte appacarN Shaapaydevebpmemlees attM estabdaaed nte. such tees may include, but an rot limaedto: CNy BeautNbation Fea, Pant Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems DavebpmeM Fee, Parma and Plan CMckirp Fees, and Sdbol Feea. / 3. Prbr b issuance of building pemNls for a new corrarwrcfal or IrdustrlW dvebpmerq or JJ_ addilbn to an exatinq devebpneM, the appaean shoo pay dvebpmsnl less at the estadfaMd role. Such fees may inekrds, but are not INtNtatl b: Syenme Dsvebpntant Fee, Drainage Fee, Sdbol Fees, PemNl and Plan ChsrAinp Fees. / s. Street addressesshahdprovidedbytheBUNd'apOllbial,allertracVparcelm~precordatbn JJ- and prior to issuance of WNdirp psmNn. J. Eslstlnp Stnlpurp t. Pmvida mrrgNarrca wdh the UnNOrm BuNdMrp Cod for tlrs pmparly Ibe cMarances JJ_ corwidedrp use. aroa, ono Me-reaietivenese a exbdnp buipkps. 2. Existirp buildings aheN ba roads to ODfryly Wah ODRed buNONp and zonNp repUlatbm for -1-J- the insrlded use a the huNduq shall W d111011arlad. 3. Fxistlrp sewage tllspoeal IadMbe a118a be nmovao, Ifbd anNor ceppe0 to oonpry wdh the ./J- UnNOrm Plumbirp Cod end Uniform Buildup Cod. a. uraierpmuno on•she u6Ntba aro to d bcale0 and shown on bulldNp plans submNtetl for J-/- dribkfp pemNl atppNCadon. K. GrWlnp / 1. Cxadup d iM aubjsa property ehWl W b accoManca wNh tlls UrNbrm BuNdirq Cod, city J-~- Gradirp SUnoMds, and axapstl gndkp pngiae. The INtal gnokp plan shall d ut subetantlal WrMomMrlCa WNh iM approved Qwdkp Wm. / 2. A soils re{bd shall d prepared by a t}IalNbd erpklear Ncsnaed by the State of CaiNOmia b --~---~- pedortn StIGt wok. 3. The dvebpnMre b baled wilfNn the soN emaion corarol poundrks; a SoN Dfeturbartce J~- PemNt krequired. PNaaewnap San BarnardNlo County DapaMlsntof AprlcuNtln at (714) 987.2111 forpemtN appaca6on. OocumeMalionaf each parrlNl ehaM be subrtNaed blue Cdy prbr b llle iatuarlca d rolph pradNq parmN. 4. A peobgbal report chap be prepared by a quaNllad engineer or peobpbl and stlbmNted at --~-J- iM time of appNCalbn for pradrp plan chock. / 5. ThefinalpradirpplenashaNDeCOmpbtedandapprovedprbrtobeuanceolWiMirpperm8s. _-J-/- x Prot 70f 1d eA,~,.~0 9/2iJ ~e~~ a •. 6. As a wsrortfbt subdivision, the lolbwfng requiremams shall ha roar: a. Surety shag be powed and an agreemern executed guarameeirtq comPbtion of all on-see drainage facNiliea necessary br dewatedrq aN parcels to the satafactbn a the fiuildkp and Safety ofvisbn priorto linal map approval artlpriorto me issuance a gradirq penrals. b. Appropriate easemeras for sale disposal a drainage water tool are Wnducted ordo or over adjacerN parcels, are to !xs deNneatetl and recorded ro 1M satbtaaion of the 6uibing antl safety DMeion prior to issuarce a grading and W ildrp permits. c.On•sae drainage improvemeras, necessary for dewatedrq and prNectirq the subdivided progenies, are to ba irataNed pdor to issuance d huildhp pertnNS for coratnx:tion upon arty Parcel that may be subject b drainage Ibwe eraenrq, bavirp, or wNhb a parcel relalNa ro which a buildkg pemrN re requested. tl. Final gradirp playa t« each game are to De sudritted b the Buildkp and Safety Division t«approval prbrto isauarice of buNd'aq and Aadk4 gamete. (This may be on an iricremeraal or composite besiaJ e. All abpe Dafecs M excess a 5 feel ro vaNcal height shah W aasdsd wNh native grasses or plaraed wehgroundcovsrbrsrosbn caaml upon conlplwbnagradNrp«e«ns other aeemative method a ebebnc«arol shah bacernplate0 b dye aalbfettbn a tlts ButbNq Oflidal. In addNbn a Immanela Nrgstbn aystsm MaN W pmvldW. Thin requkemem dose rbt release the appbanVtlevsbper Irom oompNwx:a wah the sbpe piarairp requirements a seabn n.oe.wo I a iM tMveiopnfera cede. APPLJCANT SNAIL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNI810N, (711) g~-1165, FOR CON~PLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDR'IONS: L Dedlatbn and VMIWIer AoCNe Rigfns-of-way and eaaemems shah De dsdbaled b gfs CNy 1« aA inten« PatMb streets, community ireia, public paeeoe, ptANC IarMeeep. areas, alrost trove, an0 pubNC drafruge IaeNMba as shown on the plane enN« tematNa map. Pftvale easements f« non-pudk faciNlies (aosa•bt droirrapa, local laedsrtrails, ere.) ahaN be rsaervsd as slbwn on me playa anN« tematNe map. 2. Dedicatbn sludl be made a gts foNOwirq ripMsofway on the peMtster stroas (measured Ito/metreM CemeAM): ~_ idol fact On ~sE LivrC ,Pi..rp ~ idol feet on iQe~s ,e- ~{,et/nE idol lest On teal teat on 3. An irrovocable oheradedbatbnf« •footwWeroadway easerttem ehaN be made I« all private slroep «dMee. a. Non•vetflrallar acaaa atoll a dedkated to dfe CNy 1« dts IONevdrlq streets: 5. Reciprocal access eaaemems shah be provided erqurkq acceaa b all parceb by CCBRs or by deeds arM shah W ndordsd corwairroraty with IM mttp or prbr to Vts hauarfce a buipkq pemnle, wflera rb map b IrtwNed. J~- JJ_ JJ_ J-/_ JJ_ J~_ JJ_ ~-/- -/J_ J~- SC ~ 7/al eof 17 6. Private drainage easements forcross-bt drainage shallbe provgetl and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shah cteary deNneate a 10-loot minimum building restriction area on the negroorirg bt adpirxrg the zero bt line waN and wmain the folbwirg language: -UWe hereby dedfcafe to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right fo prohbit the Q)IIa1lUp.Vn o/ (residenfia/J 0nildings (or other smicfuros) within those areas olesignated on Me map es buiWirq resbiclpn areas.' A maintenance apreerttem shah also be graMedfrom each blto the aWaceM bt throughthe CC6R's. / 8. All existing easemems yirgwilhin future ripMSOI-way shall ba quacWimed or dehneated on the final map. / 9. Easemems for pulaic sidewaaut aMbr street trees pWwd outside Ills pudb riGhlof-way shah be dedicated to Me City wherever they encroach onto prNata property. ~ 10. AddNbnal sheet rpM-of-way shag be dedicated alag rigMtum lartea, to provide a minimum 017 teat measured Irom the taw of 0urbs. N ar0 ed)awra sidewak b used along Itw right tom lane, a parelhl street has mantenance eaaemem ahtl 6e provged. 11. Thedevebperahall make a good 18ith sllorlb aoquketM rogttNSd oN•eae pnopsrty kaereata necessary b wrtetnrct the required publb bpbHmenls, and a itaraM ah0ukl faN to tl0 so, the davebper shwa, et least 120 days prbr b SltbrllMtal Of tM INtai map br approval, enter imo an agreement ro cortpMS the Nlproventsnts PurouaM b GovsmngM Code Sectbn a13~82 at suchtlme asthsCiyaoqukestheprapany Naersstarequiredbrata NnprovemeMa. Such agreement stroll provide for payment W tl» davabparol aA wMa Navrred by the CHy to acquirettte oa-aaspropedy interests IeGWrsd Inolxaten.Yfonwahtlts 6llbdivlebn. Securiy for a podbn 01 atsae coats stwN be rn tM farm al a cash dapalt in the anauM given kt an apprafaal report adaNted by the dsvsbper, at dsv~bpefs wM. The epprebsr shah have been approved by the CNy prla b wmwnwrroM of ate apprabal. M. StreM Imptwamems 1. All pudb inpnovemetas (iMedOr etreata, dMktaga fadNtNe, opmmuMy traNa, paeans, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plants attlYor taMalve map ahaa bs ODnetnlCled to CNy Standards. IMedor street NrtprovsmeMa sttaa Nlcktds, bN era rbl NltNletl b, ourb ant gutter, AC pavelnaM, drive ItppfdaCtle6, eWeweb, etroet Ngtas, anal atreat base. 2. A minimum of 26-toot Wide pavement, waMn a ~ Aoot wiW der7icatad dgM-ol-way shah be wnstruaad for all haa-seclbn atraate. 3. Cortstrta:t tlK IoNawkg peMnslsr street Intproverrwras Ntckrdirq, but not amtea to: stagier Nnsre corm a atrrtur t roc. rvswr sme w,wt obve errtt. ataear txitm mtttar ttt~ cou-t. 'rtw~ tstwNn amen ~J~ / / G / / ,/ ~,~~ e~,a, •~ G~9/rte candy o.m ~J- J~J- _i.-/- JJ- JJ_ JJ- J__1_ _/J- JJ_ sC - 1/B 1 9 of IS Notes: (a) Median inland irrdudes land5capkrp and irtipatbn on rtxner. (b) Pavemern recorutmabn and overlays wsl be ddemsned Ourirg plan check. (el x so marked, sitle- waNt ahaa be arvNktear per$ TD. 304. (d) a so marked, an in-Ibu of oonstmdion lee shall be provided for thin item. ~P~.P6w'ova' Awe .oc ~c Gaks~c~ ,e HG nL :Y GKL° Wf OF LX//E 49:bnctl lf°) i'oas(r~o-- gcs ~v .rr'o .er-~-:-~t.ev rit c me~wrcwa~ / 4. Inprovemem plans and cortatnrctbn: a. sheet improvemem ptaro irxdud'ug street trees arks groat Npma, prepared M a ragis- tered CIWI Engineer, shah G suhrtdtled b and approved try the CNy EnGtrarx. Searcy shag be poged and an agreemero exealed l01M agigadbn d the Clry Ergkreer and the CNy Agomey plaroroeairg compleaon of the pubNC anNa prWete stroll krgrove- mema, prbrto final map approval or1M iswarxxi d Wilding pemsla, whichever Dears IiM. b. Prbr b arty work bairtg perbmled b pWlb rightof-way. teen ahaN W paid and a Cortatruabn perrnit Shall W ObtairMd Irom the CNy Enpktsefe Onbe in addNbn b any aher pemYls replked. c. Pavemera atrpkp, madchg, trollb, easel name gpWq, and IntermroteG cortduM shwa 6e inetaNed b tM ealigatllon d ate CNy Ertpkrer. d. SlgrwldonduNwNhpull bpxee ahaM hskmtaNedonarryrrewo9natndaonareoormtnwtbn d major, seoorxiaryacowda atraau whkh kaeroed wlMaher mapr, aeodndary or oolleda atreeta la iulure trgfb atgrwb. Pua boxes ahaN t>• placed on boN aklas d dte groetat3feMalAaroedBCR, ECROrarryotltsrbcgbrmapprwadbythaCiry Efpkteer. Notes: (i) NI pup Ooxes shah ba No. 8 urlka6 dflsnvbe spacaMd M the CNy Engineer. (2) CorduN atulN W 3-inch geNanixed peN wNh puNrope. e. WMd conk ramps shall W IngaNsd on a1 bur maters d kasrosabrro per Clly Standards a as dirodad by the CNy Ertpineer. f. Exietlrtp CNy roads re9airklg oortgmclbrt a1raN remeb open b trMlc at aN thtea will adeiryale delandudrgcongmclfon. AgreN Cbeuro permMmrybe raquked. Acaalt depoe8 a1taN bs provided to cover ate ooq d pradkq and paving, whbh etwN be retarded upon compbtbn of the mrgtnxdlon to the aaligapbn d tlM CNy Erlpirteer. q. Concsrnroladdnirlags flows ehaN tbl crone sidewaW. UMSrebmwak drains BheN De atgaNed ro CNy Stargtrde, except br sktpM IamNy bls. h. Handlap aoeees ramp dsDipn chap As ae apedfiad by the Clly Ergklesr. i. Saeet nenlea aheNWapproved by the Ciy Plennerprbrlo subntNlalfa firq plancMck. 5. Slreq irt4kovemeM pans pN CNy Standards for eN pMgs grog6 aMN be provided for review and approvq by the CNy Engirlesr. Prbr to airy work being perbrms0 on ate pd- vate gresta, less shah Da paid and mratWdbn WrrtlMa eftaA Da obWneA Irom the City Engkroefa Ohba in addkbn to any other DerhMa required. / s. Street irNa, a miMrrum d t5-gagon a@a a larpar, a1wA M ingaNad per CNy StatrdaNS in acoordartcs wish the Ciryy grog tree propnm. e~,m .., C.o9/3~ sue: J___/- JJ_ JJ_ JJ_ J_l- JJ_ J-/_ J-J- J._/_ J~_ _/-/- J~- sC-9/91 10 of I9 v 7. Intersection line of site designs snail be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. a, On callegor or Wrger streets, lines of sigh shah be pbned for all project iMersedions, incbdirg driveways. Walls, spns, and sbpes shag he bcatetl outsitle the lines of sigh. LaMscaping and other obstrugbns within the u,. is of sigh snail be approved by the CNy Engineer. b, Local residemial street irnela8clldrla shall have their notbeability improved, usually by moving the 2./~ cbsest street trees on eachside awayfromihe street and placed in a street tree easement. '~ 8. A permit shall De obtained tram CALTRANS for arty work within the folbwing right-ot-way: -~lf/iu. ~vo 9, All pudic inprovemerns on the lolbwirq streets Shah be operatbnaly comdete prbr to the issuance or building permits: N. Publle Malmentand Anal 1, A separate set of landscape and imgatbn plans par Erghmedrg Publb Works Standards shall be submitted to the Ciy Ergirreer for review and approval pnor to Neel map approval or issuance M bulklktg penNts, wnbhever oavrs first. The bgowing landscape parkways. medWns, pazeos, eaSBnlenta, hails, or other areas are repaired to t>e anneXed imo the Landscape Maintenance Dlalrtq: ~ 2. ASgned consern and waivertonn to pin androrform tM agxoprtala Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City ErginBer prbrtofinal map approvalor Issuance of twibirq permas whichever ocars first, Formation costa shah be tprrta by the devebper. _ 3. All required public landscaping and irigatbn systems shall becorlNnuously maimairted by the Oevebper umil accepted by the City. ~ S. Parkway landscaping on the fol .,__...,..__..__ _ _ b'r'ag ttaeerys)shaN OOraormMthe resuss of the reepegive O. Drainage and FIOOd Comrol /~ 1. The project (a portbro thereoQ is boated wNhin a Food Hazard Zone; therefore, Ibod protegbn measures ettaA be provided ae certNied by a regietere0 CIvN Ergkteer and approved by the Cay Ergktaer. 2. II shall t» the devebpefa reeporoibilNy to have the snare FIRM Zone designatbn removed from the DroNq area. The davabpeYa angkteer snail prepare all necessary reports, plans, and Itydrobgk/hyMauac calalatbna. A CordMbnal Lefler of Map Reviabn (CLDMR) snap be obtainert Iron FEMA prbr b fNwl map alppreval or issuance o1 building pemws, whbnevsr Dears oral. A Loner of Map Raviabn (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to oaupancy or irprovemeM axeptancs, whbttever oa;ttrs lirst. m~o~~9/ro J-~- ~_/_ -1J- JJ- J_/_ JJ_ JJ_ J--/- J~_ ~J_ J_J- 3. A linal drainage study eheN be submitted b and approved by the City Engineer prbr to final J~- map approval or the issuance of building pemlNS, wnbMver oocun Iirsl. All dainage ~ IacilNies shall be installed as regained by tM CNy Engineer. , SC 1/91 II of 11 / 4. A pemMt from the County Flood Comrol District is required for work within NsrigM-ot-way. _ 5. Trees are goMbNed wdhin S lest of the ou4side diameter of arty pudic stone drain pipe meawred from Ue outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6. Pubae stone drain easemems shah bB graded to convey ovedbws in the evert of a bladcage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. UtIlMles / 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel irrcktding sansary sewerage sYStem, water, gas, eleGric power, telepMne, arkf cares TV (aN underground) b aocoroance wah ttre Utairy Standards. Easemems shall De provided as required. / 2. The davebper shag !» resporuiWB for the rebcatbn a existirq UIilNies as necessary. / 3. Water art sewer plane Shah 6e designed art constructed b meet the requirertlBMS 01 ttM Curanprrpa Couray Water Dlatrict (CCWD), Rartdto Cueangnga Fke Praedbn Oistrid, and the Environmemal Heash Depanmem of the County of San Bantardirto. A biter d compdarrce Irorn the CCWD is required pdorto final map approval a tasuarrrs d permits, whichever omra ikst. O. General RaquUetrtanq and AtNmovab 1.Theseparate parcels comainea wthin the probcl baundarba chap bebgatywmdned bM one parcel poor to Isauarrce a WNdhrg pemkla 2. An eaaemem for a pka use driveway shat be Pro`rided Prbr b fkre map appova or issuance of buigirrp pemats, whbhever otare flreL lot: 3. Prior to approval of the Iinal map a depoaN shah be posrsd wsh the City coverap the estenated oust or apponloMrp the aseesamsnta under AeeBSernenl Dierkt artgrp the newly seated parses. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional MaIrtNM, Secoroery Regbnal, erW Neater Plan Drainage Fees eftas be paid prior to Ilea mep approval or Ixbrto btrNtNrtq parmN Issuance N no map is invoNBd. 5. Permits shah be ot»aina0 from the bNowirp agarrcke br work wlMin thek rlpMol-way: s. A signed txtrgera and waNer form to pin arrNor brm tlw Law ErdorarttaM Cammrniry FadlNies DleerlCl shah tM sled with the CNy Engineer prbr to flea map approve W the issuance d Wlldirtp pertrYb, whichever occurs first. Fottrrabn COeta aheN bs borrM by the Devebper. 7. Prior to nnaNZeion of arty devebpmeM phase, sullidanl krgmvemerN plartb aheN be wm- pleted beyond the phase bounderiea to aaaure eecarklery acceaa and drertape paea'an b the seblactbn of the CNy Engineer. Phase bourMerks chap correspond b bt Nneb atrown on the approved teraalfve map. e~m ~'o ~ii04%Zo Ss~mlLa JJ- ~,- J-/_ J-J- JJ_ J_/_ JJ_ J-J_ JJ- J_/- JJ_ J~- J~ S° ~ ~/e1 Iz er to - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ANO DEDICATION BETNEEN JORGE AND ROSA OROZCO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII FOR SIDENALK ANO NHEELCHAIR RAMP IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED ALONG THE EASTERN AND NORTHEASTERN PORTION OF THE OROZCO PARCEL FOR THE SIERRA MADRE AVENUE-NINTH STREET TO 310 FEET SOUTH OF CNAFFEY STREET ALLEY PROJECT RECOMIENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution Dedication tbetween Jorge f and I Rosa 1 Orozcoo andubthe Cityvoef nRancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUID/ANALYSIS The attached subject Agreement between the City and Jorge and Rosa Orozco provides for sidewalk and wheelchair ramp improvements along the eastern and northeastern portion of the Oro<co parcel. Mr. and Mrs. Orozco have agreed to grant to the City a Sidewalk and Nheelchafr Ramp Easement to allow for the Installation of sidewalk and wheelchair ramp along Sierra Madre Avenue in return for the construction of said improvements. Said sidewalk and wheelchair ramp improvements will be constructed in conJunctlon with the City's Sierra Madre Avenue Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street Alley project. Respectfully submitted, 7 ~ N1111am J. O'Neil C~~~ City Engineer NJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9'] , ~ f J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JORGE AND ROSA OROZCO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Countll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of si aewalk and wheelchair ranry improvements in conjunction with the Sierra Madre-Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street Alley Project; and WHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and wheelchair ramp and other related work, located along the eastern and northeastern portion of Lhe Orozco parcel shall be made a part of the Sierra Madre Avenue-Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street Alley Project; and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Orezco have agreed to dedicate Sidewalk and wheelchair ramp easement Lo Lhe City for said improvement. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resoive to accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Rernardlno County, California. (~ 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilltam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APP ROYAL OF NEN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND RE-DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-NAY BETNEEN CARP L. YWELL AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH PORTION OF THE YOUELL PARCEL FOR THE NINETEENTH STREET PRWECT FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO AMETHYST STREET. It 1s recamiended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the new Agreement for Installation of Pubitc Improvement and the Re-Dedication between Cary L. Youell end the City of Pencho Cucamonga. BACXGROUIO/ANALYSIS The attached new Agreement far installation of Public Improvement and Easement Deed between the City and Cary L. Youell replaces an earlier agreement and easement deed which were approved at the July 18, 1990, City Council meeting. The earYier agreement arnl easement deed contained several typographical errors within the legal description. After the errors were discovered, the August 21, 1991, City Council approved a request to "authorize the City Attorney to 1nitlete a reforamtton action" to correct the typographical errors. Mr. Youell signed the new agreement and easement deed on February 21, 1991. Said street improvements will be constructed in coniunctton with the City's Nineteenth Street Protect. Respectfully submitted, ~~~?.~~ N1111am J. D'Neil City Engineer NJO:NM:KFay Attachment ~W RESOLUTION NO. ~a-(~(o~ y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A NEW AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUDLIC IMPROVEMENT AND RE-DEDICATtON FROM CARY L. YOUELL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has establ7shed requirements for installation of public improvements along Nineteenth Street; and WHEREAS, installatt on of curb and gutter, street pavement and other related work, located along the north portion of the Youell parcel shall be made a part of the Nineteenth Street Protect; and WHEREAS, Mr. Youell has agreed to re-dedicate the necessary Road Easement to the City for said improvements. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California, does accept said new Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same 1n the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Cal ifornf a. ~P7 -•--- -- CIT!' OF RANCHO CI'CAMONG~1 STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I ~''`.: n ~- SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF TRANSFER OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE. NON HELD HY DICKINSON CALIFORNIA-ARI20NA ASSOCIATES LTD (dba DCA CAHLEVISION), TO THE MARRB GROBP RECOMMENDATION• That the City Council approve the transfer of the cable franchise held by Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. to The Marks Group. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. (DCA Cablevision) was granted a cable television franchise by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 1985, to provide cable service to portions of the City. Attached is a letter from DCA's Chief Executive Officer, William Dickinson, detailing the transfer of ownership of the cable company to The Marks Group. Also, attached is background en The Marks croups principal officer, William Marks. The City has received a signed copy of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and The Marks Group as well as payment in the amount of $101,698.26 for outstanding franchise non- compliance issues. Respectfully Submitted, Susan Mickey Management Analyst I 4g i ~'s' ] :: February 2B, 1992 HY FAX AND U.S. MAST Mr. JlYry H. Fn1WOOd Deputy City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA P.O, BoX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re; proposed trensfe: 05 Ca6_e '.elevision Prarchise to Affiliated Company Dear Mr. Pulwood: Aa you era aware, Dickinson California Arizona Associates, Ltd. ("DCAA"), doing business as "DCA Ca'o levision", has been aeekina to refinance its properties for soma t'me. Z am pleased to report that w¢ have reached agreement on a refinancing/reorganization proposal that Wil; increase our iicuidity and aeaure resources to improve our service within your city. Under t..".e proposal, the present company, DCAA, will transfer its aseeke including your franchise to a new company, DCA Cablevision (a general partnership between DCAA. a.nd_.West Coast Cable partners, i.P., a Californi6` limited partnership whose general partner is Marks 6 Associates, Inc., a Ca11E0rn1a corporation). DCAA will h41d over 901 of the equity in th• new company, Following tY.e transfer, it ie expected that DCA cabievisior, will enter into a loan agreement with one or more senior lenderer including possibly Float Hank of 8rovldence, Rhode Island, and State Street Bank a Trust Company of Hoaton, Maaeacnusetts, and a management agreement w?th Marks b Aasocia "_ee, Inc. Pursuant to sactior. 7,CZ,lOC of Title 7, DCAA hereby requests the City's consent to sac; of the following: (a) Transfer of cur axiatiag cable television franchise to DCA CAHLEV1520N, a California yeneral partnership between the existing franchisee ar,d Wes' Coast Canle Partners, L.p., a California limited partnership w'r.ose general partner is Marks & A seociatea, Inc „ a California corpcration; (b) Hr.try into d '.naaacemeat agreement between DCA ... J r nr, Je[zp H, Fulwood February 25, 1992 Pace Two (c) Collnteral aaaignment of and gzant of a security interest in the franchise to one oc more senior lenders, inciufl ing poseib:y ?leer Bank of Providence, Rhoda Island, ahd State Street Hank & Tr~~st Company of Boston, Maasachueetta, in connection with a loan ag[eeme.^.t between such seaio[ lenders and 7CA Cablevision. rie would appreciate it if you could expedite this matter slr.ce t..".e p[eser.t tentative schedule calla for cloning the bark loar. by tiacch 13, 1992. Please call clay Gcaham or myself if you have any questions ar rec;;ize additio rai irf ozma tion, Thank you for your cooperation. sincerely, William S. Dickinson Chief Executive Officer CC: C_ay Graham 70 The Geaerai Partner of the Partnership is Marks & Associate<, Inc., a Califo-nia Cr.:poration. ~' The ChaiTtan and i:hiei ~-ecnflv^ JfSee: of the UererY1 Farmer is WilL•am I. Mark:,. Otbet officers aze ?oho M. Duff, ?r., Presiden[: R, Tt!ornas Goodrira; Vice Presided and Secre.tay and Albers Brzch;. Vice P. rsiGert and Chief Finar:cia; Officer. Mr. darks ~r:+s `nrn. ,:.is;::i LL... ~::c::zud i.^.~~.ih:n srd.:c_ri•:rd a Bzcba:or •~i ;>c;esc:. d _~:ee ir.~ N.echaniczi r.~rnecrin~ ;:c:n ,Skr:n: lini~~zrsi;y in 1955_ ;a a9iiiticn, :titer m his pr,-,fwssioeal cane.-, s".:. :viars i.~nu!a lra de~sr~`;.;tn Frc,i .Univatray in 'Hollywood. Plorda i:: iSSt!. Mr. MazFs starred in the cable television indus~y in 1966 in sales. In 1961, he forced his own markecng stn, C.A.T. V. Saies and Markcflng, Inc., which provided the direct sales supper,. nn a aontrza bzrs, fcr many of the top cable operators, inetuding Teleprompter and Warner Actrx. in 1957 Mr. Marks wor. the first of 43 franchises and formed his fust cable operating company, American Videe Corporaron, rater known as Ametican Cable Systems (ACS). The. company owned and operated systems in Florida, Indianz, Michigan, and California. When :[ was sold in 1575, ie had over 40,000 subscribers. Soon after the sale of ,4medczn Cable Systems, Mr. Marls begzn to build another cabin sys[cm, Mzrks' CabieVi;:on of Ohio (MCVO), which he grew [0 17,000 subscribers by 1950 when it wrS sold ro Capita: Cities Com~~,micarn-s. At the szme cme as he was building the Olio system, Mr. Mzrks was also buiidia~ three system; in Suuth F!arida, two of which were Corzl Springs CableVision ;CSCV) and '.Vest $oca CahleVision (WBCV). When sold in 1982, these two systems had a combined subsrriber base of over 22,000. The third Florida system Mr. Marks bt:ilt wrs Broward C.ut.:y C>_ble'Jision (BCCV), which had over 12,000 subscribers by 1985, when it tiss aansferted co ne new owner. l;oncureray wits ;he sate of the. above systems in 1982, Mr. Marks formed a new parmership wit}, The Me:editL Corporation and c[eatec Planned Cabte Systems in Texas and Scut Fiorida. In iS86 Mr. Mazks bought ou[ Meredith's ioterut and buil. Planned Cable (PCS-7 before selling a majority of i! Z8,000 subscribers, in ]989. The balance of i0.C00 ;ubscrfbc~s wets owned by PCS-II, which wzs recertiy soid . Today Mr. Mars is a director and major shareholder of a sma!I Sou[hwcsc bank, a director of a satelli[e television company, a director and limi[ed par[ner in a U.K. cable television business. !n addition to d,e above business responsibilities, Mr. Marks is a member of the Cable Telrvision Pioneers Ctub, a distinction he received in L79 far his "pioneering" offers in the indusvv. ~~ -- C[TY OF RANCHO CCCAPdONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 18, 1992 i.~ii 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~-~C. Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: RTck Gomez, Community Development Director BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO RESCIND AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ACWISITION BETNEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE NIL! IAM LYON COMPANY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 4, 1992. QFarasmnaTtn It is recommended that the City Council approve rescinding Agreement for Right-of-Nay Acquisition between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the William Lyon Company approved by the City Council on March 4, 1992. BACK60.011MD/ANALYSIS On March 4, 1992, the GTty Council approved an Agreement for Right-of-way Acquisition for Lark Drive between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and The William Lyan Company. The G1ty Attorney has advised that on going disucssion concerning the eminent domatn action require resclslon of the agreement with The William Lyon Company. A new agreement will be submitted for City Council consideration after the legal issues regarding the condemnation action are resolved. opment Department :diw ~~ RESOLUTION N0. G,G_rj(P ~7J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF- WAY ACQUISITION BETNEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 4, 1992 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga California, has for its consideration the Rescission of Agreement with the William Lyon Company for the acquisition of Street Rights-of-Nay for Lark Drive between Rochester Avenue west to Its existing teraii nus (the "Agreement"); and VRIEREAS, such Agreement is related to a 3-party agreea~ent previously entered into between the City, the Nilltam ,yon Company and the Chaffey High School District; and NHEREAS, said Agreement does not properly reflect the intent of the parties and is to be reconsidered pursuant to further tnvesttgation. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Agreement be and the same is Rescinded. ~Z ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and Member of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director SUBJECT: CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION AND CITY TO PROVIDE SENIOR NUTRITION SERVICES $~COMMENDATION Staff recommends entering into a year to year contract with the Oldtimers Foundation. over the past several years the Foundation has used the Neighborhood Center without a contract. City staff has developed this Agreement to better outline areas of responsibility and liability between the user and the City. staff has researched end coordinated the development of the attached Agreement with the Foundation, other cities and the Rancho Cucamonga City Attorney. The attnchad Agreement has been signed by the Oldtimers Foundation. Resp tfull submitted, Jae chintz, CLP Co nity Servic Director JS/tp Attachment JOINT USE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT' is made and entered into as of the latest date appearing opposite the signature of the respective parties hereto, by and between Steelworkers Oldtimers Foundation, a California nonprofit agency. (hereinafter "Foundation") and [he City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter "City") concerning the provision of nutritional services to senior citizens. A. Recitals, (i) Foundation is a nonprofit agency and [hose persons executing this Agreement on its behalf hereby covenant that they are fully empowered [o execute this Agreement on behalf of Foundation. (ii) Foundation, through its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, has undertaken to operate a program which provides meals to senior citizens, including those senior citizens which may live within City and seeks to obtain a nonexclusive right to use city- owned facilities [o further its program. (iii) City desires, subject to the terms and conditions hereof, to permit the nonexclusive utilization of a portion of its neighborhood center, located at 9791 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, California (hereinafter "Center") by Foundation so as to assist in the efficient delivery of services to City's senior citizens. B. Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between City and Foundation as follows: 1. n r I Provisions. A. Term ~ Agreement. This Agreement shall be for a term of one (1) year commencing as of the latest date appearing opposite the signatures of the respective parties hereto, and shalt be renewed from year to year, unless terminated in the manner as provided herein this Agreement. 7~ Either Ciq~ or Foundation may terminate this Agreement upon delivery to the non-terminating party of written notice of such termination which such notice shall be delivered no[ less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such termination. Further, in the event of total or partial destruction of the Center, this Agreement will be terminated immediately without prior notice. City shall have the sole right to determine and declare that the Center is fully or partially destroyed for purposes of this termination provision. 13. Cost Allocation. City shall bear all costs for and related to the maintenance and operation of the Center except as ma} be expressly set forth herein this Agreement. On or before the tenth (10th) day of each calendar month, commencing the month in which this Agreement is executed, regardless of the date upon which this Agreement may commence, the Foundation shall pay the City the sum of $ no dollars. Said sum shall be utilized to defray the costs of utility, including but not limited to, natural gas, electrical service, water service and [rash collection which are chargeable against Center and shall be referenced to identified as "utility costs" for purposes of [his Agreement. Utility costs shall be in addition to any other monies which may be due City from Foundation under this Agreement. C SiL ~ nt r. 1. Foundation's use of [he Center shall be limited to the provision of nutritional services to senior citizens including preparation and service of meals, program administration, and related administrative activities. Foundation shall have the use of a portion of the Center set forth and described on Attachment "A" hereto. Suclt portion of the Center may be utilized by Foundation on the weekdays. Monday through Friday, excluding City holidays, or alternatively as may be mutually scheduled and approved by the Center coordina[oi and the Foundativn site coordinator. 2. Ciry reserves the right to use, or allow the use of, Center premises. including those allocated to Foundation, for activities at such time and dates that will not conflict with the established nutrition program for seniors. 75 Anv change in the scheduled utilization of the Center may be made by mutual consent of the parties hereto if such changes do not limit prescribed "nutrition program for seniors" funding requirements. Foundation acknowledges it has not been granted [he exclusive right to possess or utilize any pazt or all of the Center. 3. Any and all recreation programs which may arise by and through this Agreement shall at all times remain solely subject to the supervision and control of City. 4. Foundation shall be solely responsible for the provision of general kitchen area maintenance at no cost to the City except when such premises are used by City in which case City shall be responsible for general kitchen maintenance. All such maintenance activities shall be coordinated by Foundation with Ci[y, using City services or authorized City maintenance personnel; said services will be invoiced to Foundation and such payment shall lie proffered to City at such times as the utility costs are provided to City by Foundation. Q n ' i n 4f Center, 1. City offers, and Foundation accepts for its use, [he Center, and any portion [hereof, in the "as is" condition. Foundation shall keep the Center in good and suitable condition for the uses contemplated therein, including the storage, securing and maintenance of equipment not intended for public use or for rental. No alterations, improvements, fixture installments or equipment additions or removals may be made, authorized or permitted by Foundation unless and until Foundation receives prior written consent of [he City for said actions. Any alterations, improvements, fixtures installments or equipment additions or removals undertaken by Foundation must conform to and be in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances or laws. 2. At the time this Agreement may be terminated, Foundation agrees to leave [he Center, and any portion thereof, in the condition Center is in at the effective date of this Agreement, absent allowance for normal wear and tear. ~~ Foundation hereby agrees to either perform any necessary repair or renovation activities which may be required to return the Center to the required condition, or alternatively pay to Ci[y, upon demand by City, the reasonably calculated sums to accomplish such renovation or repair. E Tele hp one, Fixtures, Etc. City and Foundation agree that Foundation shall, at no cost to the City, instal] and be responsible for charges related to a separate telephone line and telephone receiver to be used solely by Foundation to conduct Foundation business. Foundation sha^ gain City's consent to the location of, and time of, such installation prior to commencing acquisition of such telephone service and equipment. Foundation shall provide to City an inventory of all fixtures and equipment which are presently owned by Ci[y and used by Foundation. Such inventory shall be deemed conclusive and binding upon City at such time as City approves, in writing, such submitted inventory. Any and all items listed on the inventory, or added to the inventory list as such may be gained by City, shall be repaired or replaced, in the event such is necessary, on an equivalent cost basis where the Foundation shall pay fifty (50) percent of such cost and City shall bear fifty (50) percent of such cost. City shall undertake to acquire either the repair or replacement of any such item and shall invoice the Foundation for its share of such repair or replacement. Such invoice shall be paid concurrent with the monthly "utility cost" submitted by Foundation to City on or before the tenth (10th) of each month. Such equipment, or replacement equipment, shall be the property of the City and Foundation shall make no claim as to ownership of such equipment. Any and all equipment, fixtures and materials attached or otherwise affixed to said site by Foundation in a permanent manner shall be attached or affixed in a manner which conforms [o all existing City codes or regulations for such installation any such materials, fixtures or equipment attached or affixed shall become the property of City at the time of such installation and such shall be added to the inventory list described hereinabove. 77 Any and all equipment, fixtures or other items purchased _ by or placed on the premises by Foundation which are of a portable nature shall remain the property of Foundation and City shall have no responsibility to contribute in any manner to [he repair or replacement of such equipment. F. Foundation shall maintain, in a first class manner, the portion of the Center which it may utilize and further sha(I administer its program in a first class manner which complies with all applicable federal, state, county and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, fair labor practices, fire safety provisions, health and safety provisions, sanitary conditions, nondiscrimination regulations and building codes. Foundation's failure [o be in compliance with any applicable law, policy or regulation of any jurisdiction shall be grounds for City to immediately terminate, without written notice, Foundation's right to use such site unless and until, in the City's sole discretion, such violation is cared. Cc Indemnification. Foundation agrees that it will indemnify and hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from any and all claims for damage to persons or property by reasons of Foundation's negligence or intentional acts or Foundation's, or its officers', employees', agents' or invitees' acts whether negligent or intentional, in connection with Foundation's use and occupancy of the Center and its related operations. H. Insura~g.. Throughout the term of this Agreement, at Foundation's sole cos[ and expense, Foundation shall keep or cause to be kept in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of City and Foundation, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability insurance against claims and liability for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from Foundation's operation and the use, occupancy, or disuse of Center, or adjoining areas and ways, with such insurance providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence, and at least One Million Dollars ($],000,000.00) for property damage. All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California. Foundation agrees that City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents shall be named as additional insureds on all such policies. All such policies shall contain language, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, to the effect that: (a) the insurer waives [he right of subrogation against Ci[y and City's agents and representatives, (2) the policies are primary and non- contributing with any insurance that may be carried by Ci[y, and (3) such policies shall not be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days notice by insurer to City. Foundation shall furnish Ci[y with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them. Foundation may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. The foregoing insurance provisions may be altered by mutual consent of the parties upon written authorization and approval from the Risk Management Officer of City. I. Limitations ~ Assig.nment. This Agreement may not be transferred, assigned or sublet, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of City and any such transfer. assignment or sublease made without City's consent shall be void. 1, i;merg_gnev Operation nt r. Not- withstanding any other provision in this Agreement, Foundation acknowledges that Center has been designated an auxiliary emergency operation center for City. At any such time as the City, in its sole discretion, determines that it requires the use of Center as an emergency center, Foundation agt'ees that it shall promptly cease utilization of the Center for such time as the City requires the Center's use for emergency operation services. City shall not be responsible [o Foundation for any costs or reimbursement for any losses Foundation may sustain as a result of such emergency operation use, including but not limited to, loss of food or wages. K Foundation F in The parties agree and understand that Foundation may intend to use this Agreement as a basis for claiming "in-kind" rent expenditures from the nutrition funding agency as reviewed by the California Department of Aging. 79 City may verify any such claim upon written request from the funding agency. Further, i[ is understood that the financial commitments of Foundation that serve as an underlying basis for this Agreement are based on the availability of Foundation and auxiliary grant funding. Should any such funding diminish below the minimum program needs, or be denied in their entirety, Foundation may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to City. 2. ner I Provisions. A. Notice. Any notice required or permitted pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by personal service or by deposit of the same in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed to the parties as follows: Foundation: Steelworkers O]dtimers Found_ation_ 8572 Sierra Avenue _`___ Fontana,_Ca 92335, __ City: City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91736 B. Amendments. This Agreement may only be amended in writing, which such writing has been signed by all parties hereto. C Section Headines. Any section headings in [his Agreement have been provided solely for the convenience of the parties and in no way shall serve, o r shall be construed or interpreted to serve, to alter, amend, lim it, or expand the express provisions set forth in each section. This Agreement shall be construed as if drafted by all parties hereto and shall not be construed against any single party. ~~ D, ov ruin Law, The laws of the State of_ California shall govern this Agreement and any action brought to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall be filed in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino. E ~ilyContribu[ionc, City retains the right, at its sole discretion, to from time to time contribute services, funds, or any other consideration to Foundation. *Any such contribuUOn by City shall not be deemed to create an ongoing obligation from City to Foundation and Foundation hereby waives any claim to such entitlement or right. F. rmi , Ems. Foundation shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain any and all governmental permits, approvals or concurrences required for the use of the Center as set forth herein. Further, Foundation agrees that it shall promptly pay all charges required from private persons or corporations for which i[ is responsible, including but not limited to, food, beverage and supply purchases, utilized or pursuant to this Agreement and shall protect and hold City harmless from any failure to make any such payments. Cx Nondiscrimination. Foundation agrees [hat it shall not discriminate against any person, whether such be an employee, agent, or officer of Foundation, or be a recipient of the nutrition program offered by Foundation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto express their final understanding and agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof, and in supersession of any prior understandings, the parties execute this Agreement as of the date set forth. Dated: ~ Zo J~ Dated: FOUNDATION By: CITY By: gl ATTACHMENT "A" Foundation shah have the use of the RCNC (Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center) on Monday through Friday of each week, excluding holidays as outlined below: Kitchen: 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Mission Room: 10:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Shared Office: 8:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m. Oa` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~~ DATE: March 18, 1992 r~ TD: Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager DY BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II 1 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF LIBRARY SERVICE ENHANCEMENTS CONTRACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990/1991. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached Library Service Enhancements Contract between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This contract provides $25,000 to the County for additional library services/materials at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library. This activity is to be funded from account number 01-4532-6028-4200. BACKGROUND As City Council is aware, during the past eeverel years the City has contracted with the County of San Bernardino to provide $25,000 for additional library services at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library located at 9191 Baes Line Road. These Punds have been used for additional operating hours on Sundays and for the purchase of additional library materials for this Branch Library. The attached proposed contract Por Library Service Enhancements at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library is Por fiscal year 1990- 1991. The proposed contract contains only minor modifications (addition of wording "...materials shall be wade available to patrons of the Rancho Cucamonga Branch as soon as feasible after purchase and receipt by the County and shall not be stored, boxed or otherwise be made unavailable for circulation.") to the previous contract agreed to by the City. Approval oP the proposed contract will allow staff to reimburse the County for services/materials provideu under the operation of good faith. Execution of this contract will also continue to formalize the relationship between the City and the County thereby providing Rancho Cucamonga reaiflents with expanded hours oP operation and enhancement of the book collection here in our city. R,/e~spectfully submitte9d, Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager ec: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Joe Schultz, Community Services Director Attachment R'fl _. ):~' County of San Bernardino FAS STANDARD CONTRACT E New M'~ Change: x ! i r~....~ ~~ FOfl CLB CLB wept. Orgn, i cont~actpr's license iJO. 'BARBARA ANDERSON CIl' LIBRARIAN '' i Fun~ D ~ Orgemzatwn I Appr Obj'Rev Source ~ ActvrtV I OAO/PROJ'JOB Number ~I ~~,SAP ~LB ~ 911115970 _ FV Rplect Name ' Amnon; VD FY Amount THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by antl between the County of San eernardlno, hereinafter called the County, and Name CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ hereinafter calletl CONTRACTOR -_ PO BOX 807-10500 CMC CENTER DR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA (714) 989-1851 Federal ;D 40 or 5awi Se<unty No IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: IUse space below end additional bond sPeeLS. Set /orth aervrce m De rendered, amniNt fo be paid„ manner of payment, rime for per/prmance ar completion determmahon pl sahsractory perto:mance and cause ldr termrpatrpn ether terms and mndmons. and anach piens. specrficabens, end addenda, d any.l This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ("County" hereinafter) and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ("City" hereinafter). WITNESSETH I. Recitals A. County now owns and operates a branch library on a site adjacent to Lions Park Community Center, 9191 Base Line Road, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "Rancho Cucamonga Branch"). B. It is the mutual desire of the parties hereto to enhance the resources and services available to the public at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch on the terms specified herein. 8~ d:,esn ooo ".v trop Pano p/ a{ H. Aereement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: A. In consideration of the enhancement of services and resources which County agrees to deliver at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch specified in paragraph B hereof, City agrees to reimburse County for County's annual actual costs of electrical, gas, water and telephone ("utility cost" hereinafter) incurred at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch during with fiscal year 1990/1991 (July 1, 1990 through and including June 30, 1991) to a maximum of $25,000 per 6sca1 year. In that regard, County shall supply to City an accounting of ali such utility costs incurred by County at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch as soon as is practicable following June 30th. City shall provide the above-referenced reimbursement thereof, up to a maximum of $25,000, within thirty (30) days of City's receipt of said accounting. B. In consideration of City's reimbursement obligations set forth in paragraph A hereinabove, County shall: a. Maintain the Rancho Cucamonga Branch open through June 30, 1991 during all hours it now is normally open (including but not limited to 4 operating hours on Sundays). b. Augment the Rancho Cucamonga Branch material collection by $25,000 annually, such materials to be made available to patrons of the Rancho Cucamonga Branch as soon as feasible after purchase and receipt by the County and shall not be stored, boxed or otherwise be made unavailable for circulation. C. The City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County and their authorized agents, officers, volunteers and employees against any and ail claims or actions arising from City's acts or omissions and for any costs or expenses incurred by the County or City on account of any claim therefore. g5 D. The County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and their authorized agents, ofTcers, volunteers and employees against any and all claims or actions arising from County's negligent acts or omissions on account of any claim therefore. E. This agreement may be modified or terminated upon mutual consent of the parties. Termination shall require ninety (90) days advance written notice from the initiating party. COUN'Y OE SAN BERNARDINO Chairman, Board of Supervisors Dated _ _,_ -_ SIGNEU AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMP.N OF THE BOARD. Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino. BY --_- __.-.._~-__- - Oaputy App'oven o e rm ~ Revmwed as ip ARUmativa Acuon I County C/ou~n~l/O v Date //--~P.-9r[-- ~~-- Dete __ _ v oo-uaraop e.. ,vlo (State i{ corporation, company, etc.) By ~ lAuNOnrad S~gnaturel Title Address Remewetl br Prxenmg ABBOCV AtlmimltratonCAO Date ~~__ - 3 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 - TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager i1y BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II i' SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF LIBRARY SERVICE ENHANCEMENTS CONTRACT FOR FISCAL YEARS 1991/1992 AND 1992/1993. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached two year Library Service Enhancements Contract between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This contract provides $25,000 per fiscal year to the County for additional library services/materials at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library. This activity is to be funded from account number 01-4532-6028-4200. BACKGROUND The attached two year Library Service Enhancement Contract between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides, from the City, $25,000 per fiscal year for additional library services/materials at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library located at 9191 Base Line Road. As City Council is aware, these funds have been used in the past for additional operating hours at the Branch on Sundays and for the purchase of additional library materials for our Branch library. The attached proposed contract is for a twc year period. This contract has been modified from previous years to provide a means for the City to participate in the selection of augmented materiels as well ae a mechanism for accountability. Approval of the proposed contract will continue to formalize the relationship between the City and the County thus providing our residents with expanded hours of operation and a enhanced book collection at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library. Respectfully submitted, ~x<~, aC~ 7~~~ce.~~ Linfla Daniels, Deputy City Manager cc: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Joe Schultz, Community Services Director Attachment _ FOR COUNTY USE ONLY ' E New i Vendor Cotle --- I ~i.j QQ/~ Dept Contract NamEe! .~.. IM~Changei iA1a ~LB /r ~l "~~'°'~' I % I I Cancel 71 i ~partment CLB CL6 Dept. Orgn. Contractor's License No. C unty Departm¢nt Contract Rapresentanve Ph. Ext. Amount of Contract BARBARA ANDERSON CTY LIBRARLllV ~~ County of San 661nardin0 Fund Depe Orgamaatmn Appr. ourep Acnmty TGRCPROJiJ06 Numeer F A S SAP ~LB 900 0 '. CpmmoErtv-!'otl-e --L Estimated Paym tit Total by Fiscal Vear STANDARD CONTRACT "' ''~ w Amoum irD Fv Amoom vD Prolen Name -- - _ __ _ THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereinafter called) the County, and name CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTRACTOR aealeas -_ hereinafter called PO BOX 807-10500 CMC CENTER DR RANCHO CUCAMONCM CA Poone Bann Date (oaf vavasst - Eeee~ai io vo m sooai soca~n. No IT IS HEREBY AGREED qS FOLLOWS: Ibse svace below and adddronal bond sheets Set lurch serve Ip be renderM. emounr ro be pmd, manner of paYmenl, bme for perPormence or complepon, derermindl~On OI Sdhs/aCIC/y pC/Iprmdn[P dnd cause lnr IPl/nlnatlpn. Crher )elms al'.1 LOndirlOnS. dnd dr(eeh plans,. SpCClllCdflOns, dlid addendd i/ dny,l This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ("County" hereinafter) and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ("City" hereinafter). WITNESSETH I. Recitals. A. County now owns and operates a branch library on a site adjacent to Lions Park Community Center, 9191 Base Line Road, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "Rancho Cucamonga Branch"). B. It is the mutual desire of the parties hereto to enhance the resources and services available to the public at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch on the terms specified herein. ~O p„l)„p00 x.. n,f0 Page of II. AEreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: A. In consideration of the enhancement of services and resources which County agrees to deliver at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch specified in paragraph B hereof, City agrees to reimburse County for County's annual actual costs of electrical, gas, water and telephone ("utility cost" hereinafter) incurred at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch during with fiscal year 1991/1992 and 1992/1993 (July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992 and July 1, 1992 through and including June 30, 1993) to a maximum of $25,000 per fiscal year. In that regard, County shall supply to City an accounting of all such utility costs incurred by County at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch as soon as is praMicable following June 30th of each fiscal year. City shall provide the above referenced reimbursement thereof, up to a maximum of $25,000 per fiscal year, within thirty (30) days of City's receipt of said accounting. B. In consideration of City's reimbursement obligations set forth in paragraph A hereinabove, County shall: a. Maintain the Rancho Cucamonga Branch open through June 30, 1993 during all hours it now is normally open (including but not limited to 4 operating hours on Sundays). b. Augment the Rancho Cucamonga Branch material collection by $25,000 annually, such materials to be made available to patrons of the Rancho Cucamonga Branch as soon as feasible after purchase and receipt by the County and shall not be stored, boxed or otherwise be made unavailable for circulation. G Provide the City through its Community Services Department the opportunity to participate in selection of the augmented materials. d. County shall provide the City as soon as is practical following June 30th of each fiscal year with a detailed listing of augmented materials purchased as a result of City's $25,000 reimbursement to County. C. The City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County and their authorized agents, officers, volunteers and employees against any and all claims or actions arising from City's acts or omissions and for any costs or expenses incurred by the County or City on account of any claim therefore. g9 1 D. The County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and their authorized agents, officers, volunteers and employees against any and all claims or actions arising from County's negligent acts or omissions on account of any claim therefore. E. This agreement may be modified or terminated upon mutual consent of the parties. Termination shall require ninety (90) days advance written notice from the initiating party. :: COUNTY OF SAN RERNARDINO _ __ Chairman, Board of Supervisors Dated ,____ SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THI5 DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino. (State it corporation, company, etc.l 8y ~ __ __ IAUrM1Onzetl S~gneNre~ Dated Title Atldress BY _-_._"__ -__- _. Osprrty AAVrovee es to 1.e9e~ roan_.` ? Reviewetl as to 41Lrmat~,va Ndion ~ II ~ ounly C/o/uns~el~~/ ~O Dete ~.LL~c-ip _-- ~ Dete._"_ _._ __ .. .... _.. _" Aeviewe0 for Processing li t• Agencycy AtlminisirntonCAD Date ~"__ ox.taatt.ooo m. new nl °~~ DATE: March 18, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CliCAil1ONGA STAFF REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Engineer ~~ ,i SUBJECT: APPROYAL AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER N0. Z TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NITH PARSONS, BRINKERHOFF, QUAID AND DOUGLAS, INC. C.0. 89-001, INTERSTATE 15 AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION, ACCOUNT N0. 13-50200 FOR DESIGN CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL DESIGNS. RECOMIENDATION Approval and execution of Change Order No. 2 for the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quaid and Douglas. Said change will increase the consulting firms Contract by 564,900.00 funded by RDA Account No. 13-50200. BACKGNDUND/ANALYSES On January 4, 1989, Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quaid and Douglas was engaged by the City to prepare and submit to the City and CalTrans, Plans Specifications and Estimates for the above stated protect. Since that time the Consultant has submitted Preliminary Plans to the City and CalTrans for review and consent prior to request for permit. During the course of design the consultant was required to make several modifications to the plans to accameodate CaiTrans instructions. These modifications are the result of design parameters changes made by CalTrans responding to litigation decisions. These issues have arisen since the initial contact for services was signed. to addition we have requested further work relative to ultimate widening on Foothill Boulevard and ramp modifications in con~unctlon with the Foothill Market Plaza (Price Club and Nalmart) protect. Lastly recognizing the large cost of this pro,lect 1n todays tight economic conditions, the consultant has been preparing alternatives with various cost implications 1n order to insure the success of our efforts in the I-15 Foothill area. Currently this work 1s ongoing. Respectfully subml d, _ ~/, N1111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:JLMay CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March IB, 1992 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. G71111and, Puhlic Morks Inspector II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION FOR TRACT 12462 - DETENTION BASIN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE BETNEEN EAST AVENUE AND ETINANOA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY FIRST FAMILY HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12462 -Detention Basin were approved by the City Council on September 7, 1989, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Band: (11,600.00 Labor and Material Bond: f 5,800.00 The developer, First Family Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. The basin will be completed by the time their _econd phase is completed. At the present time, the Dasin itself exists. The only remaining item is the concrete work which is being deiayed due to the slow economic conditions which 1s preventing Phase II from commencing. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submit ~A n V "M~% N1111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachments _ 1~' ~~~ 1lLY H01.IES February 25, 1992 Steve Gilliland City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Sox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Detention Basin Improvement Agreement for Tract 12462 Dear Steve: In response to your letter dated 2/13/92, First Family Homes is requesting an extension to the above mentioned improvement agreements. Again, we have completed all the phase I work for the tract and due to the economic and financial situation we have decided to wait Por awhile to complete the phase II work. For this reason, we are asking for a one year extension. The grading Por the basin has been completed, however the concrete work has not been constructed. Please find enclosed a check in the amount of $251.00 and the completed Improvement Agreement for in triplicate. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. sincerely, FIRST FAMILY HOMES Michelle DeHart Director of Planning i Engineering MD/jb enclosures 93 fi75 W Foothill BIv0.. Sulte 109, Clan;mont. falifornla 91711 • p141626d979 • FA1(17141025.0383 RESOLUTION N0. G,a- Q(p~ A RESOLUTI0;1 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12462 - DETENTION BASIN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 18, 1992, by First Family Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Summit Avenue bettreen East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of Such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subfect to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction Nith the deveiopment of said Tract 12462 - Detention Basin; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, rhich 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Ctty Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ - C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FRDM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector T~^S' SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EKTENSION FOR TRACT 13351, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AYENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; SUBMITTED BY LENIS HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subtect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the publ7c improvements for Tract 13351 were approved by the City Council on March 7, 1991, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5197,730 Labor and Material Band: f 97,865 The developer, Lewis Homes, 15 requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement due to the economic slowdown, which has delayed the start of the protect. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully subml ted, William J. O'Ne1 City Engineer WJO:sMG:sd Attachments 5 Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 Nmh Moanue~ Avenue / P.0.8oz 670/Uplad, Celifomie 91785-0670 714ry85-0971 FAX:714ry49-6700 February 17, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Division 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector Ref.: Improvement Agreement Extension, Tract 13351 Dear Steve: Wa hereby request a one year extension on iha ebave-referenced tract. This extension is necessary due to the economic slowdown in the construction industry, which has delayed the start oP this project. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $251.00, ae well as three executed and notarised originals of the Improvement Agreement Extension form. We appreciate your assistance and your conaidaration of our request. Sincerely, LE S ME MANA CORP. JMO:kak Enclosures Josep M eson Vice rest ent Senior Project Manager 9~ RESOLUTION N0. 9`a - ~ (p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IfORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY fOR TRACT 13351 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 18, 1992, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway; and VMEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described Tn said Improvement Agreement and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, is~to be done in conlunctton with the development of saki Tract 13351; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension Ts secured and acccmryanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which T5 identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council .Sack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE HERITAGE PARK BALLFIELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Staff recommends that City Council ratify the Notice of Completion and authorize the release of appropriate bonds and retention in a timely manner pending receipt of any claims. The Ballf field Lighting Improvements at Heritage Park have been completed by Marina Contractors, Inc. A Notice of Completion for this project was filed and recorded by the County on March 4 in order to accommodate field preparations by City crews for April 1 league play. --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Counctl Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II ~ ~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 12873 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETNEEN LEMON AYENUE AND BANYAN STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 12873 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Counctl accept said Improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond 1n the amount of f56,000.00, authorize the Clty Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f560,000.00. BAacsRauln/ANALrsls Tract 12873 - located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street DEVELOPER: Daragon Homes P.0. Box 2153 Santa MoMca, CA 90407-2153 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 56,000.00 Release: faithful Performance Bond (Street) f560,000.00 Respectfully submit nn' ~CJ ~~ M1111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy ~ I Attachment __ 99 RESOLUTION NO. `7Q~~~j~ ,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ?RACY 12873 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12873 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFgtE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion witA Lhe County Recorder of San Bernardino County. b~ CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 a-qS., T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~~C• Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: NillTam J. O'Neil, City Engineer 8Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector i. SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROYEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13565-2 STREETS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER SUMMIT AVENUE AND NAROMAN BULLOCK STREET RECOMMENBATION: The required improvements for Tract 13565-2 Streets have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and it 1s recomiended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond Tn the amount of f25,300.00 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Cowpletion and authorize the City Clerk to releese the Faithful Perfonaance Bond in the amount of ;253,000.00. BACK6ROUID/ANALYSIS Tract 13565-2 Streets - located on the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Nardman Bullock Street DEVELOPER: Standard Pacific of Orange County 1565 N. Mac Arthur Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 25,300.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f253,000.00 Respectfully submit , ~c~2~-~ Ni111am J. O'Ne11 City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachment b RESOLUTION N0. 9~, O ~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565-2 STREETS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13565-2 Streets, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. Boa - CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA STAFF RE?ORT DATE: March 18, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~C, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. GTlliland, Public works Inspector It ~~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROYEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CUP 89-26, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BERYL STREET AND 19TH STREET The requfred street improvements for CUP 89-26 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 1n the amount of f5,600. BACKGROIIID/ANALYST S CUP 89-26 - located on the northwest corner of Beryi Street and 14th Street DEVELOPER: fommunlty Baptist Church 9090 19th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f5,b00 Respectfully subml , ~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachment a RESOLUTION N0. C~a. C}'(p~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC [MPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 89-26 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 89-26 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work 7s hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~~ - -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 i.~. T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council ~-~C, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspec tor~5 SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR PARCEL IMP 9350 - ELLENA PARK LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KENYON MAY AND BELVINO STREET It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. BACKGROIAO/ANAlT5I5 The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free fray defects to materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: The N1111am Lyon Co. 4490 Von Karmen Newport Beach, CA 92658 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 511,630.00 Respectfully submitted, G'7Lec~ N111tam J. O'Neil City Engineer MJO:SMG:Iy b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOPT ` `~~ ~' DATE: March 18, 1992 _ ~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jo Lynne Russo-Pereyra, Integrated Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO IMPLEMENT CITY-WIDE CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION The Environmental Management Commission recommends the City Council implement a mandatory City-wide curbside recycling program to include all single-family at a rate of $2.00 per month effective July 1, 1992. BACKGROUND In 1989 the State of California Legislature passed the Integrated Waste Management Act, otherwise known as Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939). AB 939 requires cities and counties in the State to reduce their waste Stream 25% by 1995, and 50% by the year 2000. The State mandated legislation requires municipalities to develop an Integrated Waste Management Plan, to meet the requirements of AB 939. Residential Curbside Recycling is one o} the alternatives outlined in the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element that was adopted at the City Council's March 4, 1992 meeting. The City Council approved implementation of a voluntary residential curbside recycling pilot program at their February 20, 1991 City Council meeting. At the September 4, 1992 meeting the City Council approved eMending the voluntary curbside recycling pilot program through December 1991 in order to provide a more accurate evaluation of the program. At the Environmental Management Commission's Febraury 27, 1992 meeting, the Commission conducted a public hearing to evaluate the voluntary curbside recycling pilot program. Each resident serviced by the pilot program received a letter (Appendix A) inviting them to make recommendations and comments regarding the pilot program. The Commission received public testimony and discussed recommendations for a proposed City-wide curbside recycling program. A copy of the Environmental Management Commission staff report along with a draft of the February 27, 1992 Commission minutes are attached. Four residents addressed the Commission during the public hearing. All four residents were in support of the curbside recycling program. Additional Consideration to Implement City-Wide Curbside Recycling Program March 18, 1992 Page 2 of 9 comments were made regarding whether the $2.00 fee would be sufficient tocover the cost of the program, is the City planning for business participation in recycling programs, the importance of educating the children on recycling, an Ordinance on excessive food packaging for fast food businesses, and stamping the containers with a list of accepted items in case residents lose their brochures. Following the public comments and discussion the Commission recommended that City Council consider implementation of a City-wide curbside recycling program. ANALYSIS OF PILOT PROGRAM The evaluation of the pilot program was based upon collection statistics gathered from mid-May 1991 through December 1991, end a participant questionnaire mailed to all households wkhin the pilot area in mid-January 1992. The pilot program was a voluntary program that served approximately 3,400 households, which are geographically representative of our community. Prior to the initiation of the pilot program, residents received a letter from the Mayor discussing the pilot program and encouraging voluntary participation. All households in the pilot area received a 15 gallon container along with a brochure which described the pilot program, listed materials accepted in the recycling containers, and provided information on the collection schedule (Appendix S). Collect/on Statlstlca The first performance indicator analyzed was the monthly participation rate. The State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling surveyed municipalities with existing curbside recycling programs, and found participants in weekly curbside programs set out their containers 61.5°k of the time during a given month. In the City's pilot program monthly participation rates averaged approximately 45%; that is, of the 3,400 pilot program participants approximately 45% voluntarily place out their containers on a monthly basis. During the first three months (May-August) of the pilot program, participation averaged 41%, while in the latter part of the program (September - December) participation rates rose to 48°~ (Appendix C). D7 Consideration to Implement Clty-Wide Curbside Recycling Program March 18, 1992 + Page 3 of 9 The difference between the participation rates found in the Department of Conservation survey and those in the pilot program are attributed to three variables. First, the pilot program was initiated at the beginning of the summer months when many residents are generally away on vacation. Appendix C indicates during the fall season the participation rate began to rise. Secondly, the pilot program was a voluntary program. Mandatory programs usually heighten the public's awareness of the landfill crisis and produce higher levels of participation compared to voluntary programs. Finally, k is not unusual for a participation rate to be low in the beginning of any new program especially when that program has an impact on how individuals organize their daily activities. Another measure of the pilot program's performance is the total tonnage diverted by the program. Appendix D provides a summary of the tonnages collected by commodity type. From May, 1991 through December, 1991 residents on the pilot program diverted approximately 314 tons o} recyclables from the wastestream. Residents on the pilot program generated approximatety 4,672 tons of refuse from May through December 1891. Based on this information, the pilot program residents diverted approximately 6.72°k of recyclable materials from their overall wastestream. "Building Sustainable Communities', a environmental guidebook produced by The Global Cities Project in March 1991, indicated that effective curbside recycling programs divert between 5 and 7 percent of the overall weight of a communities wastestream. In addition, the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) estimated residential curbside recycling to divert 5.2% of the residential wastestream in the short-term (1991-1995) and 10.5% in the long-term (1996-2000). One final statistic is the composition of the materials collected in the pilot program. Appendix E summarizes the percentage of each commodity type collected in the pilot program. Paper products constituted 72.56% of the total materials received. The City's SRRE indicates paper products as the second largest component of the residential waste stream following green waste which is 27.6% (Appendix F). The second method used to assess the pilot program was a public participation survey mailed to all residents in the pilot program area. The survey was distributed in mid-January 1992 and included five questions along with an area for suggestions on improving the program (Appendix G). Of the 3,400 surveys mailed, approximately 40% ware returned. Appendix H summarizes the survey results. (~8 Consideration So Implement City-wide Curbside Recycling Program March 18, 1992 Page 4 of 9 Freauencv Set Out - The first question asked participants was how often they placed out their container for pick-up. Approximately 69% of the pilot program participants utilizing the program set their containers out once a week. This indicates the pilot program participants have enough recyclables to warrant weekly collection. Conta/ner Slze -Approximately 66% of the participants felt that the container sire was sufficient, however at least one-third of the participants felt that the container was too small. PubUc /n/ormat/on -Although the majority of participants felt they were provided enough information to participate in the program, many recommended that a specific list of items accepted in the program should be provided. Encouragement to Recycle - Seventy percent of the participants felt that the 'Environmental Benefits' were the primary reason that encouraged them to participate in the program. Nearly one-third felt that program convenience was also a reason that encouraged their participation. Envlronmentel /morovement-The majority of participants indicated that the pilot program was having a positive effect on the environment. Many residents suggested publicizing informatics on the exact impact the program is having on the environment. S?ther Comments -The questionnaire also included a section where participants could write their own comments on how the program could be improved. Many participants were pleased with the program and encouraged its continuance. Other comments sent in by participants can be categorized into the following areas, but are not prioritized in any order: ' More information on accepted items Statistical information on the status of the program ' Container size ' More than one container ' Separate containers • Program financing Some participants suggested a status report of the program be sent to participants which could include reminders of the items accepted in the program. This information could also illustrate the impact the program is having on the environment. ~~9 Consideration to Implement City-Wide Curbside Recycling Program March 18, 1992 Page 5 of 9 Many residents had expressed the desire to have more than one recycling container. Initially, some residents felt compelled to keep their recyclable items separated. Conversely, the trend in municipal curbside recycling has been away from 'separated' to'co-mingled' programs because of the new technology in sorting materials and due to the fact that residents find co- mingling recyclables more convenient than separating them. Separated programs require storage areas for three containers rather than one, and the resident is burdened with carrying all the containers to the curbside along with their weekly refuse on their collection day. The seccnd reason cited for having an additional container was that participants felt the current container was not large enough for the amount of items they needed to set out on a weekly basis. As indicated in Question p2 of the survey, at least one-third of the participants indicated that the container was too small. PROPOSED CITY-WIDE CURBSIDE REYGLIhG PROGRAA: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), outlines specific elements that have a positive impact on curbside recycling participation rates. Without an adequate level of participation, materials will not be diverted from the landfill and the goal of the recycling program is defeated. The characteristics listed by the EPA areas follows: 1. Mandatory participation 2. Curbside collection 3. Provision of special containers 4. Collection of recyclables on the same day as regular refuse pick-up 5. Comprehensive and integrated public education Characteristics 2 through 4 have already been integrated in the pilot curbside recycling program. Characeristics 1 and 5 will be incorporated in the consideration to implement aCity-wide curbside recycling program. According to the article 'Public Participation and Recycling Performance: Explaining Program Success' appearing in Public Administration Revlew (1991, Appendix I) mandatory recycling programs have a diversion end participation rate almost twice as high as their voluntary programs. In addition, mandatory programs usually send a strong message to the public by bringing home the seriousness of the landfill crisis and as indicated previously raising residents environmental awareness. ~~~ Consideration to Implement City-Wide Curbside Recycling Program March 18, 1992 Page 6 of 9 Mandatory recycling does not preclude residents from continuing their own recycling efforts. Some residents may choose to save their own aluminum cans or donate newspapers to their favorite charity. The purpose of a mandatory program is to prevent residents from placing recyclables in their regular refuse container. Tha voluntary pilot program initiated in our City captured a 41% participation rate. Instituting curbside recycling as a mandatory program will positively impact the participation rate and subsequently divert a larger percentage of the wastestream from the landfill. Public Educat/on Camoslan The key to implementing any new program is an effective public education campaign which informs, educates and involves the residents and the business operators. Beginning with residential City-wide curbside recycling, a comprehensive public education campaign will be launched to help all residents and waste generators modify their current waste habits. The fallowing highlights some of the projects and materials that will be developed to help publicize the program: " Recycling Workshops - A series of Recycling Workshops will be scheduled to provide residents with logistical information for participating in the program. The workshops will be held at the City's Community Centers approximately one month prior to the implementation of the program. ' Program Brochure -Anew program brochure will be developed that describes the program, the materials accepted in the container, and provides a collection schedule so the resident can successfully participant in the program. The recycling containers will also include a heat stamp of materials accepted in the program. Residents will receive the brochure along with the container. ' Mascot Competlt/on .The Environmental Management Commission (EMC) will evaluate the final enures for a recycling Mascot Competition at their March 27, 1992 meeting. The EMC will review the entries and make a recommendation to the City Council at the April 1, 1992 City Council Meeting. The Recycling Mascot will be placed on program materials and other into:mational items to promote the Curbside Recycling Program, as well as other waste reduction programs planned for the future. ' Newsletter- A newsletter will be developed to provide residents with information on the progress of the program. The newsletter can also be used to highlight the other methods residents can use to reduce their waste- stream, such as using non-disposable instead of disposable consumer products. , Consideration to Implement City-Wide Curbside Recycling Program March 18, 1992 Page 7 of 9 • Other Brochures- In addition to the program brochures, twc other brochures will be designed and made available to residents. The brochures will inform residents on how to make environmentally safe shopping choices; discuss'Pre•cycling', which is reducing the amount of waste placed at the curbside; and provide a Directory of Recycling Services. ' Community Events- National and State recognized events such as E,a~1h Day and Recycling Week will be used to inform residents that curbside recycling is coming. These community events will be coordinated through the Enviromental Management Commission. • School Presentation-All school districts within Rancho Cucamonga will be offered presentations on recycling that will also highlight the residential curbside program. ' Speaker's Bureau -Letters will be sent to all communty groups and organizations notifying them of the availability of a speaker to discuss the Citys plans for reducing the waste stream. • "Block Leader" Program • The Ciry will solicit volunteers interested in serving as a recycling spokesperson for their neighborhood, similar to the Neighborhood Watch Programs. Block leaders will receive periodic updates on the program which they can disseminate to their neighbors. The Bock Leader Program will allow residents to become actively involved in the City's recycling efforts. Fiscal Imnact According to a Biocycle article, (May/June 1988, pp 37-38) 'Cost Analysis of Curbside Programs' by Dr. Barbara Stevens, the costs of curbside recycling programs are determined similarly to the costs of regular refuse collection. For example, both residential refuse collection and curbside recycling operate under similar principals. Each system uses large vehicles which have similar maintenance and operation costs and both require vehicle operators with similar insurance and benefit packages. There are expenses incurred in curbside recycling programs and revenues generated from the sale of recyctables which may result in a savings from avoided tipping fees. Identified below are components of curbside recycling economics. The possible cost off- sets do not result in lowered costs for providing curbside recycling services. The following is a summary of the estimated costs associated with a residential curbside recycling program for the City of Rancho Cucemonga's 27,600 single- family homes: ~ ~a Conslderatlon to Implement Clty-Wide Curbside Recycling Program Maroh 18, 1992 + Page 8 of 9 Personnel $ 308,000 Maintenance & Operations $ 319,000 Capital Costs $ 246.000 Total $ 873,000 At the current market prices, it is estimated that the sale of the co-mingled recyclables will generate approximately $91,000 annually (Appendix J). The program will also experience a savings in landfill tipping fees, since the amount nt refuse deposited into the landfill will decrease. This savings Is estimated to be $119,000 annually based on data received from the pilot program. The savings in landfill tipping fees and the revenue generated from the sale of recyclable materials will be used to off-set the costs associated with the program, To fund the remaining costs k is recommended that a $2.00 per month residential recycling fee be collected from all single-fatuity households. Residential Recycling Program Costs $ 873,000 Tipping Fee Savings - (119,000) Sale of Recyclables _(81.0001 Total Program Costs $ 883,000 $663,000 /27,600 single-famiry homes =$24.00 per year $24.00/12 months = $2.00 per household per month The residential cufiside recycling fee will be independent from the County of San 8emardino's Tipping Fee and the City's Refuse Rate Resolution. The residential curbside recycling fee will become effective Juty 1, 1992 and will be reviewed annually prior to the beginning of each fiscal year. The City will also purchase approximately 30,000 recycling containers to implement the residential Citywide program. Replacement of lost or stolen containers will be provided by the refuse hauler. It is estimated that et $5.00 per container, 30,000 will cost approximately $138,000. 11.3 Consideration to Implement City-Wide Curbside Recycling Program March 18, 1992 Page 9 of 9 SUMMARY Residential City-wide Curbside Recycling is one of the AB 93S policy alternatives adopted by the City Council at fts March 4, 1992 meeting. This aRemative will reduce the volume of refuse deposNed into the landfills, thereby saving valuable resources that are currentty being discarded. The implementation of a curbside recycling program will assist the City in complying with the State mandated requirements of diverting 25% of the wastestream by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. A City-wide program will also raise the public's awareness about the landfill crisis and serve as a catalyst for educating our community and raising the community's environmental awareness Respectfully submitted,, ~~~t~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer ~1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Environmental Management Commission Publ~ Hearing Letter APPENDIX B Pilot Program Brochure APPENDIX C Averege Participation Chan APPENDIX D Total PoundslTons of Commodities Collected APPENDIX E Pibt Program Waste Composition APPENDIX F Source Reduction 8 Recycling Element Residential Waste Composition APPENDIX G Pilot Program Survey APPENDIX H Pitt Program Survey Resuks APPENDIX I Publ~ Partbipetbn and Recycling Performance ArtIGe APPENDIX J Estimated Commodity Revenue APPENDIX K City Counal Public Hearing Notice for City-wide Curbside Recycgng Program APPENDIX L Environmental Managemert Commission City-wide Curbside Recycling Report and February 27, 1992 Drefl Minutes ~~ - _ _ r APPENDIX A ~~ N C I-I O C U C ~~ ~i O N G .~ February 13, 1992 DEAR VOLUNTARY CURBSIDE RECYCLING PILOT PARTICIPANT: The City's Environmental Management Commission has been directed by the City Council to conduct a public hearing regarding the pilot curbside recycling program on Thursday, February 27, 1992 at 7 p.m. The purpose of this public hearing will be to gather facts regarding the program and to solicit your recommendations for improving the pilot program. The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga prides itself in seeking its residents' input on various issues, and since you have voluntarily participated in this program your suggestions are very important. I wanted to take this opportunity as Chairman of the Environmental Management Commission to thank you again for your voluntary participation, and express to you that without residents such as yourself the City would not be able to develop important environmental programs for our community. As a way of updating you on the pilot program, the City has diverted approximately 254 tons of recyclables from the waste stream. This equals approximately 508,000 pounds. Amore detailed analysis of the pilot program will, of course, be presented at the scheduled public hearing. A natural outgrowth of the pilot program is the issue of costs. Unfortunately, many individuals assume that there is a dollar profit associated with the selling of the commodities after collection. A critical factor associated with all curbside recycling programs is the market fluctuations that oxur when commodities are sold. The market fluctuation impacts storage capacity, a critical component of curbside recycling programs, and does affect program costs. As with any program developed, there are fixed coats which must be paid regardless of market fluctuation. Our purpose through this public hearing is to educate our resldertta of the environmental Mgvor Dennis L Stout Mgyor PrOiem William J AleMgndef Jock Lam. AICP. City Mgnoper e$fTi C.~c Ce~tgr ~rve . Pp aor BO' , R, . ~ Councllmember Dlgne Wilnams Councilmember Pgrnelq J Wngnr IInn COUngJnlembBr ChgflE$ J Buq~e^ W~ r ricnnUU Cu<amonga CA ot'!y9 .~ha)cBV.•a5^ Curbside Recycling Participants February 13, 1992 Page Two benefits in addition to clarifying the dollar costs associated with the program. An important environmental benefit associated with curbside recycling is the extension of our already burdened landfills. As many of us are aware, we as a society can no longer continue to bury our trash without severely impacting our limited natural resources. As residents, many of us recognize the need to recycle in order to make our environment batter for all citizens -present and future. Beyond this important issue, is also the State of California mandating municipalities to divert 25% of their tresh by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. This will be no easy task for our City so your input is critical to the success of managing our waste stream. Again, please join the Environmental Management Commission at its public hearing on February 27, 1992 at 7 p.m. The meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers at 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II, at (714) 989-1851, Extension 2007. Sincerely, Lfl-r-~+~'~"" aliams Chairman of the Environmental Management Commission cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council Members of the Environmental Management Commission Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst 11 117 m 'c -z W a ~6A ~~O C3^._ ti~ i `vG 'f l!J A ~ C A ~ ~ a a ~g v 3 ~u _ ~ ~ ~ z V 'vOGO[d i E ~ Y ~ ~ y tO R~1 - z ~ - g " __ - _ ? ~ _C R ~ E ~ ~ _ Cyy L ~~~ cYU .L= ~ ~ J c C ~ [ ~ .[ ~ ~, ~ ice." ~ o ~ ~ = 9 r_- S T -~E ae, `o C%~ YOd °CSY eY Sm 3m 2a g f ~ c = o ` P ~ E $ ~ $ ~ Y % N Q ~ ~ 1 > > 1 1 1 A s ``;; Q FZ" L 47 CW Q ~ ~5 s. ? I~111; 11 ____{-__ QppaZ v =~__ s=a==_-=_ ~r~ E b~~ W ~ --. = ~ inn Q z= =_ ' =_ ~~ ~ = c E o W ~ Zt,°~-g- N= 4 ~ °~V t ~n 0 4o~ri .. _ Xcr: N~ 3 q ~ cB_ g q'^8i`oz'g f W W F ~~~ g6 ~ g'S~ v , g ~ d `~ ~ s~~to o'€~ W S~~ °4 0 .~L og,Eo /^~. g-Qa n c 'd m ~ 3nYSc 11"~~ 1'~ W ~ S~~ p° a E - ~ v p S c W B$ ~ c p A „~ ` a =._ Q ~~ o ~ $; V k~ p V q ~ x g = q ~ ~ ~ N r r a ~ y x~~ 3 3~i;o~C W cv„S~ =~ R4 ' ^P=g Se`E n ~ Sa_ v r~o c d _i o?E3 Z V V 6 ~ N. ~= V sn ~ ~$~ Z ~° $'o &,°,° V ~y 4n~`~ ~ 4 ~ as c ~ a ~=sg- ~' o€~gt q -~' =~~X_ ~'- y 3 A ~ ~ 4 ~ ; o> W g Xc i °' J? Z~ a k J a c°~ q V A _~q V ~_~,o .~_ CW .,d 4~ W a~; e~ L41 6 VW g^,^~~ gfR<3x" V10 Vn~F¢~'~ eon>{;a~S ~m ~ ~ ~ Z x ~ _ ¢ ~ o v 2"~9S W 3 q„S p ~V v'o~SS Sn.im ~~6g Cj7 Z Q Z O Q g U H a W a W a a c~ 0 o~ a O J a a U .~ a rn ¢' ~/ U 0 0 Z U v. o~ a r v ,.~ Q W H O O V W N 0 Z 0 a J H H )~1 a z ~ ~ c a W D O C'3 Q 1= ~ a = W a~ W J 0 ~ 0 (~ U ~ ° ° ~ ° ° ° ° i n o u i o ~ n o n ~ ~ V Cf1 (`'> N N r r spunod Idol 0 ~e~l y ~~ a O ~ Q ~ ~ n QQ ~ o c~ n co ui Oi .- N (00 ~ ~ ~ n W N (V ~t O a W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O m ~ (/1 O ~ .- m m T r~ r ~ a u~ ` r ~ W m cO.~) aD O ~ J J ~_ ~ O 4.0 F N Oi h O .- F.. N tp ~ ~ D r r Cy ~ N N T M N ~p Q ~ ~ N tD f~0 l ~ ~ OI ~ M O r O p tt p m O n N W N 2 m N ~ ~ C d m d ° ° ¢` ¢` a` a ' - - o ~ o m `m a a a H F°- ~' ~ I W d W a v a m W Z ~ ~ c x W O O C3 ¢ F= ~ a = ~ ~ ® ~ ~ 0 O Z 0 Z O N O V W H N 3 a oc O a 0 J W k ~•J H a O V W N 3 oac a O a ~, PI o 0 0 0 0~ o ~ ~ a ~ ~ OD O N N ~ 07 i.1 NN (p p~ On. ~ N ~ ~ h ~ O ~ f0 Qi N OC CC 7 ~ V' ~ v N ~ cp ~~ ~~ ~. E °' q E d a H V ~ C7 a F ~ a s O a 0 ,., a z O /Q V W H N 3 J Q H Z D W W 5~i r~ e • ~R i o GiO ~ m _ $-8 K N w V ~ ~m e~ d A O n E' a •_ e 0 0 0 4 A m ..°m d ~ ~ aN ~°~ 0 g ,. a Qm O U ~' 2 ~ v i O ~w R U ~ tim C g Z~°£ CW7 = v ~ p~ ~ O v OQ ggti 2Y Q ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ = ~ 0 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ g W ~W m ~~ o ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Z ~ « @@E ~ R ~ ~ n~ N ~ E F= ~ a °~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~ W ~ N ~ 8 £ m W~ ~> Y g ~ ~s ~~ ~~~N ~ e> $ ~ 8 ~ao^ , 8~' ~ a Z2 0 = O N (D m V 2 W ~ $ ~. Q W a n• o Y ' W 2 0 y ~ r E ~ c ~ ~ 8 W w 8~ . m ~ Q m J R ~ m fi y N ~ C ~ .7 ~i H V $ 2 ~ ~ F ~ ~ 'm d h ~ z ~ ~€ g g ~~ y p . a S c mm m .E „ 3 O G~ U U an d Y ~ (V t7 A H PILOT PROGRAM SURVEY RESULTS • Numl»r Porcont Roepondin9 Ree;wnding Container Sot-Out 1 Week 960 69% 2Month 300 22% 'Month 72s 9% TOTAL 1366 100% Contsinq Sizo Too Smell 464 34% Sufficient 903 6896 Too Large 5 ~ TOTAL 7387 100% Program Inforrnatbn yqg 11H2 88% I.lp 187 14% TOTAL 1369 100% EncouragomoM to RecycM Convenience 483 2696 State Law 27 2% Environment 1184 70% TOTAL 1654 700% Environmental Boneflte Vey 1287 989ir Pb 31 2X TOTAL 1316 100% 1 Pr9~ 1 Iv~ APPENDIX 1 Performancep~jainm Recy~ng ~ g Pro~`am SUCCCSS David H. Folz, University of Tennessee jtueph M. Hazka, Univershy of Mississippi mom drarnrsare wa sucaa cye/g,,.er rota rat7eaggprp• grarw Porrou+ing upon .arrwr rrsaarrl1 wmJirca.d on wa dalgn and managsrnara ysd/duaap ncy¢une.,rjorsr (s FofsY arnc4 M waMaL'Nar lour o/PAIf), UasW NfrmW /awpb Har4a arNarp ro drrcowrbaru bnponrra 4adpopu- rarker, socbacorpnrr[, arrdpoaacar cbarorrirfalctara M daarrrnrntrrq warrlatav aa:cm yd~irmrp~, 7y'' JMd/Da1 arch sucoe drpsrsdr nsorr an rbepobctu thorn, bwu wry an salacaq and boa w0' ma /nrplwrrnlad rmbr won on rotor aorrrmunuy cbmxanasa. tn.tbor5 aaboagb rocormndasonr may Jrnmrv ubkbprgfranrr anar4ard we aWrnrmrpvyornwnre cykcar ^csd/rsPRr~ nnrarm In wa baMr 0fwabdar~rrs and nrnrrrgsra. tcnowkdge of who wodo and why In tenor of getti~ drizem m partidpase 3n recycing h usefW iufaronryeq for foal o8'idab who deshe to ;nimte a ro re0oe a recycling program (Poitock, 1987; DeYoung, 198Q Sundeen, 1988). this snide eamirres the eauot m which community and demographic dranetedstlp, recY~g P~e+, P~ invdvemrnt m po8ry dctlgrr and implementation, and ocher features of the laal openrirrg environmrnt distlnguish the fides that have higher races of tayding, A antral quesvotr 0 whether me ie~8 PoBde mat woh web in some atin are equally eNectlve in other communitles lonrod in rti6c- enr regiaw, whom populadons vary b, siu, socbem ^O~ ~Po~4 P~~ arlutm, and form of gov eminent. ff apecisc onmmudty featwn and de>ographic fac- raa are trsrporfma ao aommrtlrrg for higher rue of peso- Hdpanon urd divaNan, thin loaf a~dale may need to soak hack rocydiog e~ecntlora, a hurch maior edu- catlon and inantlve tampatgru mrgeted to thoaa groups m the dss am IGri irldltled m tecy- de. Mandating pattldpatlon In recydin6 h arsather optlas uuder asrh dtatmsonop. ~ P~~ dtuaaaietln and other mmmuniry vadahka arc trNnrforrarq, compared m specWc recy ding politico and publklnvalvemera in po8cy formula. con m eaphhdng retydhsg mooe+a, men mbar po8tla a communty arlbpq am boa x adopts mein, auume P impautsa far twr utsdmantsding of how and why same oomomarYb oasis highs rates of rerydmg fe esena, the pramYe d recydhtg an be mere eas8y rralmed if foal a®daY ran antld me boas mar are imporunf dettm>mmou d e:allent recycling pedor- ~. Prevlau tnnrrh m edibsvasoe recycing suggested that dtla wim higher noes d pattldpatlon and wore strain divenlon Place mote importance on citizen involvmsnrt io the ptslky IrtiWtlorr and program design dechlarr (Pda 1991x, 199t_h). Ihne flsdinga offered modae ettiphfvl support for the pmpaeitlon char ati- zw are mere LOady'oo partldpaoe edectrvely N co8ec- me e8oru' when t6e~ hate hem parry m the policy tlechioto (PaeEDoe 1990. p. ~ Thomas 1990). s8 NrElradahYaroa MYtr • tlsresbto~Deomhs 1991, va ti vo 6 leg In additbtt, seveN polide axrc (curd to promote higher ntn of rcryding, rccat notably mardating pattitipauon, rol- Iectirtg tecychbles at the nubside, ant offering a community composting program Ullan, Plan, and Moms, 1969; Folz 1991b). Cities thu provided free bins m households, stt a specific recycling Bowl. ant employed pubik eduntion and marketing strategies That were part of a community-based ouvach effort experienced more reryding success (FOIz 19916). Vining and Ebrens community recycling studies (19g9, 1990) confirmed the imporarxe of wellksigned edu- cational and publicity programs in motivating citizens to rery- de. Were these policies effective partly because certain socioo- mrromi< <hanaerittics of the population or odrer cornmrutity future predisposed a higher level of citizen rtnercsa a par- ticipation Nrecycling, or nn Ionl oaidaia expect succev regardless of the variety of feature that differrntute color The rcsnrch on collectively mproduced servim, such u recycling, B inconclusive wnh rcspttt to the salience of nri- ous dernographic chanaaistia m deteroining pardcipatkan (Percy, 1964). Voting and Ebteo (1990) fount that tecyckts rend m be somewhat older and wealdtie. Bundem (19ffB) found that only higher edunuon and teaidentid cones (pe- sons residing Nmedium-sized cities) related positively m coproduction participation; income, hotrtemtatetsfdp, ethnid- ry, age. and gender were not good prcdiaas of the praperui~ ry to volunteer, Mohai and Taight (198A, io ronvaw, ohanved the[ age ant krtume sett assodated wgh arvkm- e mfoaet m~ toraef d4Jb ma Thttaa~a moots wah ess admrfn, racyt$ng ooaadlowe wee Idadkd fateln. Phu + f0 persmt t obtaimd from 164 oootttlbatos br a The two dmendenc nt6t6kr. 1Le dam a~od mmlvmi~ menul activirm~ the young expressed the greaten level of envirorunennl concern, and middleaged persorv were the mox likely [o engage N volunteer activitin. Fertis (1~8e) rcporttd that no dtmognphr variable relaud m a person's pmptrssiry to volunteer. Bmdmry (1990, p. 1~ roxluded the[ "the coproduction literature has not adequuely addressed issues of rnativation a reWkalent' m e-rylaining who u likely [o pamdpate in ro0eaivety mpmduttd pro 8~s Recycling Performance Indicators and Demographic Features Resdts of a tmtiunl survey cadta7ed N ]990 Cue grey box) Waereta reload par-, ticlp+r. rd disaMae twice n hlgh v droir ~ arptelaey5.' convenience of partldpatfon thu auheide callediat atfaded tesideoe in vduauy tecyding programs was apparcn; mean partkipatiw m die with matefde pick-up was 4g.6 percera compared m 24.6 patent fa pmgrama wkh on19 ~Pd cdkcrioo systems The tgserMOn rate sverc 12.3 peroerit and 1o.e pncenr, repnWdy. The moro far the population and mmtmtoay varuhks ka each d the pmgnm type ate greed vt Tabk 1. owetal4 ady a few chataaaisucs distirtguched the ciriea m tad type d pto®am. eroldMgar ~ ~a~atieted ]teii~ IWt>b sad Apfl d 799D. Meador, and e~od 6aMaaar fo i So etas, ttam~a DYtlet d EEtoImEY. AY aooedNroa b 24 erta sad the aiq pmdlapy sane meYd tpadooetllat MPome was psnaN. `,,t1e aeaaatY and popphtloe Naacbtrtlaaa d the Wuded'feapefYtd ~ Pe1ao o eadp 199D. The bra and dM d6 wale AresYOO racer The dy ~ wsedlalew booth regaca o the ma9 9umtlonnai¢. ItadNeil aFkmmne~daoopaphic farm alndd~rtlaWndpenon who rmy be mee tlm and rllveMon.~ OOM` k vf!laR we eryea amalMs; mac OomSealmil d~io hse M1igM' teryding rates Froda sad ae~IR bled tAe t aeaad, eYged araya• arJ h alit q /Yh nrw popdV appal far new Pte- 7hb mdRMa,til~dtla wNeral/otmed paraamms maf Glee mantctaaidd tet~dlog to morallMk etlhuta~hatae fncNaedbeap~tbrea7d1a~1feoertYOaalrYr!tlet s a wbde (Iyfas 19gQ 14dhv, ds PnPofdm and ocmmuot>/ vadtElls a0add R/at erne paaeloaoltr In e~la4ung partltlfutlott sad diseelae b wAslap, tahardtmmedaeaT propesyheauee do taea hwt dabaldhw. tbnadmmMmlaarM ~~~tltlNd fhe Gaaelmpaw~btapYYledadMloe bdtlaen Wr~c~pa aot)r •thopaBr aTaeemaa fa des, thY - ~ std de 17S tohtostT Pto~.+aideatlK 66 duc Md aPP~~ m ~S~[ to fhe ~ 9hees. ~ P°~ trye Maras Wee atitideY apteeea th mapr coo- Publi P,rnsrymn >td R¢yc1^A Pefinm~ Ilgihriry enpam Saoa I 1. G~ ;r 7~We 1 _- hims lr tbs pbpoistion and ~t~ly Variable YarYbk lgaodabey Vow G~ Populalvn 85.5]6 79,786 10],5%8 30.017 Percem (amok 51.94 51.43 51 fi0 50.92 Percem wltl[e 93 58 9].25 89.40 91.36 Housetwid sae .'2 265 2.63 2.69 Percera owner 52.25 5'.50 5].53 57.29 Mean househdd uicome 21.929 21,3]5 22132 19,843 Ptt npka himne 8,219 7,913 8,259 7,278 PdeeN white wear M.44 26.58 2688 z4.51 Median education 12.63 1301 13.12 I2C0 ~'~ 3z.5o 30.78 30.68 30.95 ~ govermma 28.00 53.50 60.50 32.00 IMC2v1 GtWne (persxm dYtemotbn) Maatietic 23.00 40.00 38.50 46.30 4rdnimd 76,00 48.60 5230 48.10 Tndleonal tAO Ii.b 920 5.60 Cities with mnnda(ory recydirg had lower leveb of ownttocnrpied htxadng and median educauoml atuiomm[ and a hightt median population age. They sea also much mere likcly m love an udirdualistic prsliucal atlaue. Cme wah aWr4ruory programs wM about twice u WRIy ro have a sound-managtt faro of government and a mraaliat polhl- cal cvlmre. Demographic comrasts were most apparent betateerr citlc akh vdumaty cu(hmde and vohmtuy dtt>ptd systems; the loner group were significandy smaller, more naauy homogtt4enlu, laser wealthy, and had kmc levd• of formal educational attainmem. 7Tey were almwt twice v likely to have an umdormed type of govertsmena Mandatory Recycling Iblkiea and Community Features The bivadate cotrelariau udkaterl that ady a few aod0e- canomic charactaltio and mmmsmiy fnmrca aeae tdaxd [o recycling participation and diversion N mandamty p(o- grams (Table z). Snralln dtwa and rh0ee with udivldt2allttic politinl cultures had b8f>w krveb of rerycRog pattitlpotloe Cider wdh a higtrtt percrnt whine. a beer per aPn ire-ome, and a lower median age also o(.pand m divert more waste through recycling. Reg(ession analysis asmuircd the actual import of cam- murury attrihum compared m mcydmg pol5de for explakh ing variation N mudatpy pttrtidpatfoo. Table 3 reports the snndadimd partial rcgteuion mdfldttrp, a hens, that brdF cue dte relative impwrmce of each (actor yr the participauort model for ctie ahh matdatory recydmg, poly orr commw mry attribute, poRdcal cvlmrc, attained signifkance in the model. Cidd wkh k4dividualixk politkal cWmm had higher raw of partitdpation, ben at4er faGOa wen more ittglotran hr explaining why cities varkd in recycling partktipanon. Chief among thex was the abWry m impox sanctlotu err warnings for noncompliarme. Mm partidpatlw among cities wvh thin pdicy was 77.24 percat, sigoilurvly higher than the 63.5 percera for ernes withom dds erdweemerx cY• Confumarion of the impanoce of pard[ipedm by key communky acme m the fo[muiarion of recycWrg smtegiea was indinted by the higher participation N chin that involved local eduntion penomel N the prepantbn of communiry awamnev m publicity nmpaigm for the recy- d'n8 p~ Lrduding a rerycling compoxm in the lanl school curticvlum and ets<oungutg <hddan to share thu udgwnon wvh other u home may have attdsmed fa dtu hightt partitlpatiom Conversely, cities that rclicd mote on imPasotul paid radio adi ro publicrse the program tad loucr rtes of partgpanpc lbghtt p]fmlpation alln OtYWterl in Od6 du[ Riled more ememivdy on general warm collection fees ro help Rnaraz the annual operating mats of the rexydl-sg program These higlur fen apparerdy modvamd mom residents m recycle. The factor moat imppnn io mmibrWnB ro hightt waste scream dfawslon was the type of vehklea aM erryipmem used m mlleex recyclable, The use of Watts wxh comport. meracd vailm (or cdlecdng recydabk materiab wu the cquipmem mMBwat(nn used by dtks Uu[ diverted more wane (Table 4). ~ two aocioemoomk hemra atnioed signiliprrce m erylaUmg maoMroty d4vsbre borer melon age and high tt percent white It b mtewonAy thy neMttt fattor dettt- ~pa rhea chanmeriWO appeared to ypss and adasraf ware genmt• were two clnractededo of the ~8 diversion rd incentive imphld lay higher~laadfdlenWOnmene the fis- piling fees and ~PbYmerd ~ rtt7db8 coordlnatas wah more ypn of experience in the field a( solid-wa4e management. Cities wuh bah fnnaes lad higher levels of divttaiwa4 IYbk 2 Ceeaelatloar err Ibpolallm arm cammmr~ Palebles ~ ~r+aPm 9u®nhaaion Vr CJisu oi.eralon eennvtwala -.lt• .2r 21 .12 Pawn wtase .l0 28• F1ou+ehnld tier .Ig 17 Mem houdroN mtm .11 .39 02 w ~ ~ zr Median elrafon -,to ~~ 02 Oy -.21' (0 • lmtv7pW u • rtaml - u ,m p0lakal csrlnue •.26• Ztl • p e .05. Sm PEkc Admkriamm Mow • Hor®UnR1s®Ea 19pI, Vd 51. vo 6 { ~~ 7fble 3 Bawtsib (oa' CYbeII Partldpatba in f>tcc7rllo8 (N ~ 89) Iodepmdea VUtWle 6 seh eaa ~~ inpoper stpannrn Impatan¢ d ctixm pm4apaaon u a pmblml Uae d paid ndp ads m pudidxe ptognm Polibl adtwe F4uaioa amcnb mva4ee m cRwMR eauration Dn>anm Gaetal11wad4 7cdinaon'm~~ss4es I1~ba d ~ "~R b~ a+' .3N. Adj RS • YIB. 1363 3.95 303'•' -3.58 3.OB -.292"' -u.R7 s.ao -.26r -s.95 2 % -.2u- 17.16 l78 .11r 2n .11 ns• Ta61e 4 Ye~evaiou A[sahb foe AaKe 9avm DNasalon la Mandatsr9 Yac~cllag Pmgrama (N' 89) 7eaeeDmaeotvtrae a des le» Ut< dwcYs aih Caian padcDarim tae Medlin 1980 POPS ~ Amumt d the hodBll tlppmg ke -M,omt pyuhalan whae m 19e0 Yam a.did-wage ®n.R~t ~d~ 4.33 1.12 .355' .7119 .OSR .32r' m 2w -alo- .056 .0711 )80- .N2 .093 .z3r ,7l6 .159 .IIS' R] - .374 A¢ R7 • .329. • p <.05. p c.01. D <,Om. • p <,%. p <.01. don and divenim, bu Ihae waa m a01M11mt pamem d aig- p <,001. nifleanre laas< ~ n'PD- ~IIC >~ n~tipla111p ammed among the mmmlmab that had dsopoR ayu~s N wm, soeioecammic dtataevetisdts were cemP~~1 (iabk 5). Among these elder. hlghc pamcfpaaan aM dher- unfmportanf in eaplaiNng ~~ m Sian appeared n ocar when the a7 ~ ~ PnPaf+o~ pattklpatlon aM divenwn. Mast important for attaining of femab, rider tadeaa, and dtlaem with highs edtla- higher participatba were the abWty n ienre aorlalottaa or tbml attalOmmt. wamu>gf far nonoootplbnoe, the mvdvem~ d loal eslaa- rim petaotmel is daigrling a recycling pmmotioml am- 7fie muldvatiaae far aP 17S vdureary Pew Wes Tale ~. itsditaaed tht Rlmor_d0 of the paigo, atd~ thtrNo~eW memrva rtlrd m td aolkai0n ~: pp1~ m pastldpMOavl~eapYlatdbf Wh Ytaa6 tsawaf fees used n help P1 ~ ~ ~P~ was popuWloo a mmmumYy vathhle. Whu cotlo$ured VOlantary RtCyCliog Polio wad I m n ~h~io.~ wm~m~et d~iafaNa COmtIILllily ~CStOPt9 tllia savix the added otnvmieoce dead? fadlluted cidra:n partklpatlon- In addling eaauaev wYh private hatlkss [o ea vdnnmry pn~grattu, some of the aodoaaoomic fat- mikrt tetydabla was Impatnn ro ptomang Ngher leveb taw were relateq and m the dveedoo eapeae4 n pattitlpa- of tohmbty pattlclpadon. Ahlnat 40 paceat of the dries had iabk S Candatloau olPopsWion and Ccm®oYi Paesa6le ne1W fLhea Partlcipatbu and ~Ynre Staeam Dtaaasbn la Volaohe~ ~1~/ ~Rm vanlaYlc rs Mvairrf reywlew OftaaaMa vdrrsdWe ranlelgrfos Oltraloa voYewfd hmesladaa w~ DlsuaNa Popahti0n .a .o! -.dt .m ,p -.v Parery (anak .1! .03 -.10 -.18 .~ 31' Pacers weee ,OZ .16• .W .10 .18 13' xousehdd.:,.. ,a -.dz .oo -.o: -.03 ~o+ Penes owns -,10 .% -.11 .0! -.62 13 Man hourJwn intone .t4• .02 .12 .OS .W .OZ Per mpea ircnme .2(f .OS 19' .OS .N OB Pacaa wMm cellar .15 .01 .06 .03 .19 OS NNhn eduotlw .73• ,14 .% .12 .!t 18 Medal age .a .n• a .% .ze• ,o• coranmat type (0 • UNefamed3 (1 - RdwnO .IS• •.% .09 -.01 -.Z? u rolYlol adlRle -.09 .oo -.01 .ao -.ol u0 p <,05. htbYc lLtedp+fon ad kndly P'atamms ~e{ho/as ACSa ' 1 I ~v 7aAle 6 ~>trsab g0e fY~ PaWdptlpp in M 7 ~a7el{nO paop'+nte ~ - 175) todcpendeau Vattlle b sEb heY ,~ c" w~ ~ ll.n 3.a .err 1 r 1 r ~ ~~ aeagn ~.m t.oi - zzo•- Re~yclmg 910 26] 3l7" ]mportaae of loal sub m devgnurg ~'aT~eP~e /.05 t.t9 .309- A~mwacaradkaa~recyrrla~yea 8.76 3.35 .t66- ilummum .03 .009 .13T ~ Pa6am ~ry 8,77 1.01 .136' uJortanao ~rir,ga usad b publkire Ne reay<l'vrg prvbvm s.+e 3.31 .lla Ra - .111. sdj. Ra -.385. p<,05. - p <.Ol. -P <.al. sudr avrura¢s. To ousimine prdq private haukn may have provided reaidenn with frcc bins, or promaed rerycling more extensively if anntnq provhiau pesmirtcd them m a part d the proceed, from dte sale d reeychbk Tedminl asaismoce from ,me agorclo or pommel wv not imPordm in the design d volunpry recydkrg Programs. ConvoselY. laal govenlment staff played a very impgnm mk in the program deaipr proosa The ataR was probably utsvumwal in helping the m esablieh a !ecy- clurg Boat FsaWadurrg a firm targrx and nePertirg pmgaeaa rowartH m aCaktmeM appamuly morivagd dlhma ro amity the praake d mcyelkrg Higher prim for aluminum, one d the mWt valuabk rery'dabk matoiab, had s aimiW eHeq. The m®uople thu Pad mnarmoa the madrq prior foe nxgdabka btaupk m dropa9 caaen m doubt mmuraBed mar houaehoda m make the trip. Composing biadegndable yard waarn wu mteBl drat Promoted higho P~'>~dan t finally, the airier thu ngied mere aooWvdy on meokp about how and w~hoe m rea7~rle 7yy w,aso ~ <rtttd higher levels d aquas prugram paMgpatioo, T~hia stnrcgy, mere than arty otho type d mdzabB or publkity eHon, had the mos patnshl m boost vohmtary recydky kv. ela The tmiltivariate analyso d waste dkamlon for erg vohm- tary programs (Table 7), once aBalo demonatn[ed tlut saioecorbmic variabla were nor Important m rsplainNg a~ pgmminendq in~ezd plaioirn ao~n~uoh~la diverted more d drert waste cream Gom diayrau, m effect, cdirem rose ro the dullmge repreaemad bS a you higher dun Ne modal 25 peroem lend. ,~ Cirirs wkh higher dhersion tyro also were more likely m Iratuport thew solid wale m a saninry IatdfiB lanced ouatiG the county. No douh[ ells higher disposd dnrgcs ktnrrrcd bl' these dries were an urcermve m ma>imize the reryding efiom Throe soategies used wuh suasen m asarounge arias m recYde weR ~ newspapo ads, ampargru by laol savor troops, and [echninl assstarxe from local rnvlronmenW groups m the ptepaorion d puDlidty programs. These spe- cific types of community outrnch efforts iliuminue our urrdoaaodktg d how some dries vnmged m divert more d then waste. Involvement 69' the communhy'a young men and women kr recydktg drives aM upping the eaperknce and network d variarr envbonmoiW groups axaamr¢d a rows demmalved publirYy aM edrrcariorul e1hM N m otardamry programs, the rose eapeiorttd caadi- naton of vdunnry propams Played an important role in helping m engineer a highs ao®mey divenim rue We market, and ~~ krsowledge d recy- y~ dividends m farniWrlty svYh mmmunky leaden grstloB more calnma m recycle reguhdy. Recycling Policies and Community F la Dropoff Programs ~ PoPtdatlart a cam®dry dsrsam'letlo ate imporvuR u >0 in variatim d rayrhog auaas, these egeas TaWe7 k'R'~ ~eab fbr ~Vippe 94eam DNvalon is '~ ~ aa7dlq Pamg{fm (N -173) larre/aratyaelabae - e86 bas Soll4+rue dlWed b ho008 .305 .053 .357- -539 ].r3 -.z7r rac .set .022 .err used b I prcRam 331 1.16 .17Y dtlero ro rtayde 3.76 1.(j .163" l3{ i.91 .143' od aapalma ,lb .075 .130' R3 -.409. a4.8a .383. • p <.os. - v<.ol. -' p <.001. ~ hlYaksdehlmhp prvkrr . Noa®bR/ppp~ 1991, vd 51. `b 0 13a- Iybk 8 Yaulb for Citlzra is vofmtary, neov.oRi«7cltoa Ptogr+m (N - 66) todaprydrnt YaafaWe 6 Srb tteb recy<1me <acNWtors yon d Sd~wzbe und00~t d 1.20 113 A35'^ h same county u cornvynay -12.67 1.09 .289' .Yi{ied MMC WI1Q included ~N M<aia pdragrvn u.oj 4.n .267- ge population N 198D 1.16 .559 .191• Ra - .503. ,~, Ra ..478. • p <.05. P<.m. '^ p <.0p1. shoWd b< mint appanmt in the programs that are the least sde cogeetion xrvimyms~ptovt~ded, Wiedeoo mot remtmsber m sepanrc mcyclaNev, rare dsm urol atrHidea[ vduare jwdlies a trip m a 'ceovemmce' aoter, and then have, a be abk m obtain a mearu m trarxpart the mtenaL m the collation poke Orc would e:pea ddeaw wills high er irrcomo and edu<adon, far example, m have the resamrs m partiogte with grater regularny rn this tYPe d program. The regteeGOn arulysu far partklparbn in dmp-oB pm gum< howevv indicated dos oily cots population thancxr- itec, higher median age. had any import for eaphmmg hgM a partidgdon. Moreover, thu facrar u the Imd hvfwtdm d the four variablm in Table 8 the[ together accounted for almost bNJd the variance in pardcipatfon Of premier imPortmae m tlropdf programs was the sdid- svaste matugerrrem e>~erierrz d tln mcydurg mordiaatar. Fspnierte N malting dedsiau about the best rtnoegic loa- tioru for drop-oH ttnren~ or a mere eneoYSe nerwuk d canruv witA kry rreighbatpod leadua a graupe may have served coordutarnts weg in dretr effao m madmlze pWd- grion The dmpolf programs that drrrpad mare of thek aaxe mnaatted with a pdvue advadWsg firm for promabo of recycling they also had higher rasa of etlaen pammpatlou Ounach efforts by loal a(flcWs m inform cM3era about reryding was important is divadag ante wane vdunrmdy liable 9). Holding regular neighborhood meetings to erlca:nge cmrens m mcyrk may be eJkNVe bensue [hex can be niloned m suit the klformadoa needs of teNdetus from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. The gve variables is Table 9 explain over 60 pertem d the variance io diversion; the only demographic chaneteritic that has nay import N helping m rsplaio highs divmion u the older mediae age d the population. The policy d paramount imptMarce u a wegdesigtied, grassroots publidry camgign mtuiaing of hoeto-fatt metsings wkh IacJl odkials. Thex efforts suc- ceded in pmmping drop-off rerydmg ~dlesa d ;Ire per capita income. median eduadon. or nay aher popW.mo du,aderitn. Conclusion lkcyt9iog suoza, u mnwmd by partlcpotbn nerd dNv- aioq is body tat dependent upm dtY sodoecarw®c char aeteritstin a alrv pdiool (Wooer d the community. What explained large proportiooa d the variance in rayding per- farmarae among tido wkh diffeem programs wem the spe- c ~Y~B Polide< adopted, the Pram by which crom- munitia made flex policy dedsioru, and other Ensures r<lafed m the prognm'a opennar. The hivuiave analysis suggeted dot name poptdadon and commuNry feamm were aseacuted wiN wccessful pm- gnams, hW the o,dtipk negrpgm amlyaes deannmued thu these heron did not account for the recycling wcceu eapyed by the titW in our study. While coo>mtmty vad- abla maq be impotun 6or ptedksing dtlaas pteferat<o for, err a cmmadry's abdky m afford a ptutlcular NP's d recy- chag Pm6am, rhq scene as iotpodao[ demrminaaas d a dryer ~ per. Ia tWa mrence, the 8odings d Will iarpu are auspkiau for they suggest that local oftkh4 no manage the facmn coos[ importan for atiskving hqh rata dnecytWg, Wrreach effom by loavl oNicWa to raidetns of city tserghborlroods, coupled vvltp etluatlood and Publicity cam- P~< PrcPued wMh she asiwsoe d krol edsratbn per- stsrmd, envkafrmetaal Qgapiratiptn, or Ot11e( dt¢en grwps, weR typ4pl feanw of the program dingo and tagslemensa- tiao ptox:n d the tstlea avklr the most suamful recycling eAoro. Tads apptoadt corrooee+ a ta0te deamagttd, cronad- tadve process u @ refaces m the farmulatlon aril impkmenta- tioa of strategies m enhaom partitlpmbn is recycling. Fa a Tahle 9 laaW got Fine gbteam Iriraalon m ~r~~~~~(N^~ b sg b bin Came va1C drahYig dm b Pamplaa dreoydng 17.16 3.P .414'^ .IB•/ .037 413 tr tbetbe~ 3. t6 t.63 347^ n b~ l0aed b a dgaear rotratY 3.19 1.83 234^ Medan ago d popidWm n 19g0 AA .337 172' ga • .6j9. ado Rt -.609. • p<,03. p<,Ol. -' p < 001. ~6r ra~m>m re~ag aata~ F~IWSry 9ngam 5ugns ~ 3 3 :Il mP[odl[Ltd Pognm dNl [elfin upon ckaen wiuingtlev m mwin a change in waste disposal belovior without any dixa, immediate, « tanglbie benefiu m the hausehdd, the emphasis on cirizrn invdvemrat in policy (olmWation may deepen drc sense of peasaml mpputb8hy and cammi[men[ to solving a problem m which everyom mrmibutes. The dries wY,h dse moo successful vdunory efforts esob- lished clot, challrngin8 8~' ~ rtcSckng a apedfK propor- tion cf theu waste stream. Thry also provided crrtbside pid[- up and (tee tau, convatted wiN a private company (or collection urvicn, and in6timted a composting program, The ability to issue sanNOas or wArtlinga for imp[oper sepa- ntlon, aM fuNrcial cirasmnanoes invok'flg m8ccdon and tipping fees were important for mandatory programs. RegaNkss of program type, dtln with higher pamdpaWn and diversion ntn employed more esyrerieaM recgding mwdiDUas. The pwchasc<'unume.dispose bclnvbnl cycle is a long- standing ooe in Amaicul society. Titers a2 warty scums [. The oaya mom PmdPdm rR wr mooed A' eK rwonre m fie P~ ~~P. atom whe pemoF d Ihme Wa01e hmraeholy ame6P do pamper m ~ Imydba PlaPmi• The drys wee free Merlin nIC ML aeafaaC ~ rA[ ~a D Iht glrtla0m 'la FW erAmaba whe peamraae d fie o>d amlW ao6d face aahar ~ mstl 1ao17 her Dam Memd frm dhpoel bP aF6e/ 2 DeegapNC' sad mmre0.7 demmeYlo wee dnhel pdeerly has fie 1960 CeMIY1 d Glarrfl PtpWk,a L7aadwYb W the 191D AWe, Theera, dins. PLq and D..N Nana. 196. f9md lS Pmorwe Arm.ratrrmm~2wedAw. ~mhNa[a D6 ire. roc lAOl sfl 9adhox 6mMey, Jamey L, 1990. Araaarry NlYmwiMgrmm b W /aM1[ Saga: p4nm7. rrrae, mafeNMnra tahrrwyAtlMlm sin Aradr[a. rA lameT9ae Pohlkhm DeYmn0. frfinead 19th •Sme Pr7[bokad M9®dPegdb~ The Saumae dCamarrr4eMfamoea'dAr6a.ma6'wad 6lnfrr,a [e owP~, PP esAe6 Clear, Dodd. 190.1 Aae[YfM A~m[Ye A 9}le eq• IIf .9mm Mom Yak IWpr and bow. Pubaim Pero. Lamm 9t. 1910. "the lke d Yahmmm Y Iwekc !nom PlodWbe Same Demand and Supply Caarldumbr' TzW .ramp Onmartal vd 6904rrN, pp Ya0. FoN, DaeW g., [991x. '9seyaWt Pmpam OWp, Napa0.amapt sad PanklpdaA: A Nadafrl 6maq d Mrk1pY Opelm¢• N6Nr Ao Mrre1 cal !1 D11P4re! PP 711-fiL 19910. •teeTrlly 3o1N 91ame Otlm lwdDnioa m the Dmlas d a Capadlrad Imaaa' .fir eadlyd Calfrlmlrie Amfm Podm, A Swa ao0 Rtaae A Der9er, 1960. PfelloPrir Awnamr6q m AmaMUnr CDIm Smm!ma9u/Im ImNroq Ill ~ taa4 ~3~ ICdlllriOn and resotlr[e recovery amx®n that watts p[odllc- ers cos empty m pmahase mess wisely, coavlme les. and te:covc r[w[e. We do nest sugge3t tlot these b a single, fbca sct d mS'dm8 pdidn far evmy 9: our fmdiDga however, confirm the importance Of an open, demovatic procw w deddmg how aM who m reryck. •~• DaeN B Ib6 u an Astlfam I'IOfamx of Politlal 5ciesoe a[ the University d Tmnpsee, Rnoavl8e. FINN RAUtdI foalr a w sox and klnl govmnmrn[ sesvkes sad rnvhortmwl policies. Hb anicits have appnred in several journals including Publk Mmleis/ranpn RavMm, Smu and Lxal [.a[fmmmr RerMfm, and Peblk PruducrWlry RmMfrP. In progRx i9 a book-latgsl[ mflrrrattjp[ as so1Sd-wzv[e recycling in the Untied Soto. Jatyh Y. Helen is a6 As+iatam Professor of PoBual Sdcaz u fie llmvasuy d Mtsdsdppi. Hb rescarcll and tcaddog iDtefw foao m rmvin>ommral isern and poicies. Notes CMnem So[W awe lmrmlak Ommaweea. The tPpe d prmmm (rdormad a avmlomed) wo dsUnea Noe IoNA Mualtlpal VaboNr, avd eke pAhid mlWS Oeriamrlm win amaloed Nam Oat (19 W. The aaAa/fa paWd alOewmsralWC~i, aal~ nmYe[ • 7, ad IaMlse0.mc ~ 1. !. Nullrarorayer su dmemdY aq die maxim node\ l TAe re~kvd lest lkr mgryyanA®m6l pa Now. Pei aed ee dyer, Iqn. •M d Pfahmrd caemm Act Orbrelr d tae maml Ymw ta6r0. [ilo•IlnrP htlmm' JarW narearprmwt/{ wi (!, pp 7>MIS PaehM, 0.ohe1 G, 1990. Tarhomnml Va1rm and DemomuT: The ttm6ere d Ike Ilmf CAf7.' b Nmm 1. W m a6iad [ Rla0. ed4 aaearaweeY9h6[ymM1999r, ~aihRaCm/slmW Qmredl'. [at pp 3/9167. Peay, 9mphr ~, 11t1'Obr lnOdprof b M QgraAmba d Dks 1ealts• PM.~aQYfAP~I ad. l9 Qmr3, pp l1[i16. Pageaf. f.)edk [RP. YM~ CNr ~wr /M N41W Mr N9tYK Awe DQ 9amldweai Iafhlrm AodmR Ndrrl, 19M.'mpNYY6 hltldpM ! CapoAlalon A Sed! d 9'alaelma' .Afldss6frm Qam6fgl.d H. PP 917466. Thor, John 6y1me 1911. Tlh6e Iwda®m Milk Mw6rme Amptlat rtl Tarllat • lmrwfd Tkem/•' PrAllr AMlndnrb sines sal laQYy/Aarleq pp 1!lill ViaNy J91W Yd AagW threes, 1969. 'Act 6veluelof d the Publk 9apar b a enaomh9 6a*ile0. Waabe Pmaam' Saclry any ,ValuelieerrS as 7, pp 3976. __ , 197D.'ahe 6YYm a rldrd A GimpeYm d IcYrlea m0 N9rfa7dm' ae.6aeew w/ 1sM~eit sVL n Uanufy), pp. 9}73. hilkAdmhl~ellm 6nYw a NormbaNeordr 1991. vd SI, va 6 d d Q ~ ~ fO ch `n o i T n N a Z ~ CI Nd ~ N V3 r ( p M a N Q W W ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ O o ~ o ~ O ~ o ~ ds ~ ~~ ~ Ua 0 O ~ N O v m O N CO ~ O O 5 i i m p> C V' ~ a0 n Ch c'~ ~ iii O a O C c ~ O r r . - O _ ~~ V W C a o 0 0 o a o o tJJ ~ a ~ O m O O N N r ('7 8 `~ E Q W U ~~ LLi EF o ~ W "' W J ~ m v ~ k ~ ~ k ~ a = •. a ~ a F= ~ a o 13~ A r r. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ~- RANCHO CUCAA10NGq ' ;CITY COUNCIL NOTICE ~IS HER EBY GIVEN 1Daf the Ranchb CpComongd Clty Cou OCll will hpltl a PvbllC Hearing In the 'COUncll Chambers locates at'thc Clvi< Center, 10500 'Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califer~ nia, at ):CO P.M., on WPGnestlay, March i0, 199), fq cpnsitler the loltowinq: -'~ PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION OF A R ESIDENTIAI CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM AND PROGRAM COSTS FOR ALL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIp ENTS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA. Anyone Raving Concerns pr questions on dny of 11e dbOVe i1em5 i5 in Vl~en 10 COmdC} the resbective Divizioni Department at fne hum Der(5) given or Viiif the ollice5 OCa!eC of 10500 Civic Cebter OnYe. Rancho CVCd- manga, California. Anyone obiecting 'o or m favor al `rye above, maY appear in person at the above~tlescribe0 meefln9 or maY submit their concerns in writing at P.O. Bea 00I. R anrlto GUCompngd, CA 91139. . Publish: March 6, I5, 1994 (CC1395 ), l37 W d a ~~C ~ W d j m o ~ O v r ~n ~ rn ~ o N r~ R o O C o c '] ~ r f~ N V Z i0 ~ N ~ M _ i .- (O V E > v~ v, NE9 » .v c~ F» rn ~f W p~ ~!1 O O O O O o li ~ C ~ ~ ~ Vi 49 (Op ~ r V to _ 7 v Ua Q m O 7 o m o ~ p ~ N ~ N ~ O ~ O. V OD c7 T7 lfi . A C ~ N ~ ('7 r r (p O .~ O y ~ U V W C C • \ o \ o° \ o o \° \° ~ ~ ~ r1 Ld y O ~ .~ N f~ (7 ~ r W C7 Q a ca O ~ 1~ ~t O O Q W 01 ~ ~ m O N N r [7 p U ~.., a O E o r o a %n U ' W ~ .. ~ d C O ~ ~ ~ ~ O W E~ a w ~. ~ N ~ x a ~ a F ~ o v ~ F o a` z ~ a i= ~ a ~ S' a NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING -~ RANCHO CVCAMONGA „CITY COUNCIL '~~NOTICE ~IS ~HEREB V, GIVEN~'IDat the Rancho Cucamonga City Coun<II will hole a Public Hearing In the 'COUncll Chameers Iccaletl at YNe Clvlc Center, 10500 'Civic Center Orlve, Rancho Cucamonga, CalilOr nd, at ]:00 P.M.,'on V/¢ebesedy, Match 10, 1993, fo Consiett the fallowing: ' PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION OF A RESIDENTIAL CV 0.8510E RECYCLING PROGRAM AND PROGRAM COSTS FOR ALL SING LE~FAMiLY RESIDENTS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Any9r.e having concerns ar questions on ary of the above items is Invitee to cenfa<f ma respCCtive Divl;i0n/Department al 1.^.e nomber;sl given or visit the etlice; locates at IbSob CivK Center D!IVe, Rdncno Cu<a~ m Onga, CalilOrnia. Anyone ohiecnng to Or in fdmr of fns above, may abpear in person of flfe.dhove'tleiCrbae meeting er mdy sVEmlt rhea concerns In wreing ar F.O. Bhz BW. Ran<h0 Cucamonga, CA 91119. , Publish: March d. I5. 1993 (DCi1851, 13q APPENDIX L CITY OF RANCHO CliCA:v10IrGA STAFF REPORT r, DATE: February 27, 1992 '"~ TO: Chairman & Members of the Environmental Management Commission and FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 6Y: Jo Lynne Russo-Pereyra, Integrated Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: PROPOSED CITY-WIDE CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Based on the pilot program data, it is recommended that the pilot curbside recycling program be expanded to a mandatory City-wide program and include all single family residential units. It is also recommended that residents receive an 18 gallon container versus the 15 gallon container currently used in the pilot area, and that a comprehensive public education campaign be initiated in conjunction with the implementation of the program. BACKGROUND In 1989 the State of California Legislature passed the Integrated Waste Management Act, otherwise known as Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939). AB 939 requires cities and counties to reduce their waste stream 25°k by 1995, and 50% by the year 2000. The mandated legislation requires municipalities to obtain these goals by preparing an Integrated Waste Management Plan, which describes to the State the source reduction, recycling and composting programs the City will implement in order to obtain the diversion percentages. In order to increase community awareness and investigate the possibility of implementing aCity-wide Curbside Recycling Program the City Council approved implements;ion of a pilot program which began May 15, 1991. In September 1991 the City Council approved eMending the pilot program to December 1991 in order to provide a more accurate evaluation of the program. ANALYSIS OF PILOT PRO -RAM The pilot program is a voluntary program that serves approximately 3,400 households, which are geographically representative of our community. Prior to the initiation of the pilot program, residents received a letter from the Mayor discussing the pilot program and encouraging the residents to voluntarily participate. All households in the pilot area received a 15 gallon container along with a brochure which described the pilot program, listed materials accepted in the recycling containers and information on the collection schedule (Appendix A). Participants have recycled aluminium cans, tin cans, glass, Proposed Clty-Wide Curbside Recycting Program February 27, 1992 Page 2 of 8 The pilot program provided important information for the proposed implementation of a city-wide program. The evaluation of the pilot program was based upon collection statistics gathered from mid-May 1991 through December 1991, and a participant questionnaire mailed to all households within the pilot area in mid-January 1992. Collect/on Stet/stlcs Tha first performance indicator analysed was the monthly participation rate. The State of Califomia Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling surveyed municipalities wRh existing curbside recycling programs, and found participants in weekly curbside programs set out their containers 61.5% of the time during a given month. In the Ciry/s pilot program monthly participation rates averaged about 45°k; that is, during a given month 45%of the participants set out their containers. During the first three months (May-August) of the pilot program, participation averaged 41%, while in the latter part of the program (September -December) participation rates rose to 48%. The difference between the participation rates found in the Department of Conservation survey and those in the pilot program ere attributed to three variables, First, the pilot program was initiated at the beginning of the summer months when many residents are generalty away on vacation. Secondly, the pilot program was a voluntary program, not mandatory. Mandatory programs usually heighten the public's awareness of the landfill crisis and produce higher levels of participation compered to voluntary programs. Finally, it is not unusual for a participation rate to be low in the beginning of any new program especially when that program has an impact on how individuals organize t`teir daily activities. Another measure of the pilot program's performance is the total tonnage diverted by the program. Appendix B provides a summary of the tonnages collected by commodity type. From May 1991 through December 1991, the pilot program diverted 314.05 tons of recyclables from the waste stream. Residents in the pilot program area would h~iralty generate 4,872 tans o} re?use from May 1991 through December 1991. Based on this information, the pibt program residents diverted 6.72% of recyclable materials from their overall waste stream. 'Building Sustainable Communities', a solid waste publication by the League of California Cities indicated that effective curbside recycling programs divert Proposed CltyWlde Curbside Recycling Program February 27, 1992 Page 3 of 8 between 5 and 7 percent of the overall weight of a communities waste stream. In addition, the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) estimated residential curbside recycling to divert 5.2% of the residential waste stream in the short-term (1991.1995) and 10.5% in the long-term (1996-2000). The 6.72% diversion rate is a good measure of considering the pilot program was implemented on a voluntary basis. One final statistic to highlight is the composition of the materials collected in the pilot program. Appendix C summarizes the percentage of each commodity type collected in the pilot program. Paper products constitute 72.56% of the total materials received. The City's SRRE indicates paper products as the second largest component of the residential waste stream following green waste which is 27.6% (Appendix D). Public Att/fade Sarver The second method used to assess the pilot program was a public participation survey mailed to all residents in the pilot program area, The survey was distributed in mid-January 1982 and included five 9uestions along with an area for suggestions on improving the program (See Appendix E). Of the 3,400 surveys mailed, approximately 40°~ were resumed. Appendix F summarizes the survey results. Frequency cat Out - The first question asked participants was how oxen they placed out their ccntainer for pick-up. Approximately 69°~ of the pilot participants set out their containers once a week, which indicales the need for weekly collection, as opposed to a bi-weekly collection for acity-wide program. ontainer i n -Approximately 66% of the participants felt that the container size was sufficient, however at least one third of the participants felt that the container was too small. Public Information - Although the majority of participants felt they were provided enough information to participate in the program, many recommended that a specific list of items accepted in the program be provided. Encoura percent to R®v la . Seventy percent of the participants feR that the 'Environmental Benefits' were the primary reason that encouraged them to participate in the program. Nearly one-third felt that the convenience was also a reason that encouraged their participation. Environmental Improvement • The majority of participants indicated that the p~lct program was having a positive effect on the environment. Many residents suggested publicizing information on the exact impact the program is having on the environment. ~~ Proposed CityWlde Curbside Recycling Program February 27, 1992 ,. Page 4 of B Other Comments -The questionnaire also included a suction where participants could write their own comments on how the program could be improved. Many participants were pleased with the program and encouraged its continuance. Other comments sent in by participants can be categorized into the following areas, but are not prioritized in any order: ' More information on accepted items ' Statistical information on the status of the program ' Container size ' Mors than one container ' Separate containers ' Program financing Some participants suggested a status report of the program be sent to participants which could include reminders of the items accepted in the program. This information could also illustrate the impact the program is having on the environment. Many residents had expressed the desire to have more than one recycling container. Indialty, some residents felt compelled to keep their recyclable items separated. Conversely, the trend in municipal curbside recycling has been away from 'separated' to'co-mingled' programs because of the new technology in sorting materials and due to the fact that residents find co- mingling recyclables more convenient then separating them. Separated programs require storage areas for three containers rather than one, and the resident is burdened with carrying all the containers to the curbside abng with their weekly re/use on their collection day. The second reason cited for having an addKionel container was that paricipants felt that the current container was not large enough for the amount of items they needed to set out on a weekly basis. As indicated in t]uestion #2 of the survey, at least one third of the participants indktated that the container was too small. ~'~3 Proposed Clty-Wide Curbside Recycling Program February 27, 1992 Page 5 of 8 ' p$DPOSED CITY-WIDE CURBSIDE REYCLING PROGRAM "i'he Environmental Protection Agency (EPAj, outlines specific elements that h;ve a positive impact on curbside recycling participation rates. Without an adequate level of participation, materials will not be diverted from the landfill and the goal of the recycling program is defeated.: The characteristics listed by the EPA are as follows: 1. Mandatory participation 2. Curbside collection 3. Provision of special containers 4. Collection of recyclables on the same day as regular refuse pick-up 5. Comprehensive and integrated public education Attributes 2 through 4 have already been integrated in the curbside recycling pilot program. Attributes 1 and 5 will be the focus in implementing the City- wide curbside recycling program. According to the article 'Public Participation and Recycling Performance: Explaining Program Success' appearing in Public Administration Review (1991) mandatory recycling programs have a diversion and participation rate almost twice as high as their voluntary programs. In addition, mendatory programs usually send a strong message to the public by bringing home the seriousness of the landfill crisis and as indicated previously raising residents environmental awareness. Mandatory recycling does not preclude residents from continuing their own recycling efforts. Some residents may choose to save their own aluminum cans or donate newspapers to their favorRe charity. The purpose of a mandatory program is to prevent residents Irom placing recyclables in their regular refuse container. The voluntary pilot program initiated in our Ciry captured a 41 °h participation rate. Instfttrting curbside recycling as a mandatory program will positively impact the participation rate and subsequently diveA a larger percentage of the waste stream from the landfill. Peb/!c FducaGon Cemcelan The key ta}, plementing any new program is an effective public education campaign ~ich informs, educates and involves the residents and the business - operators, Beginning with curbside recycling, a comprehensive public r I~Y Proposed City-Wide Curbalds Recyciing Program February 27, 1992 ,. Page 6 of 8 education campaign will be launched to help all residents and waste generators modify their curent waste habits. The following highlights some of the projects and materials that will be deveoped to help publicize the program: Recyc/ing Workshops - A serves of Recycling Workshops will be scheduled to provide residents wRh bgistical information }or participating in the program. The workshops will be held at the City's Community Centers and City Council Chambers approximatety one month prior to the implementation of the program. Program Brochure -Anew program brochure will be developed that describes the program, the materials accepted in the program, program collection schedule so the resident can successiulty participant in the program. Residents will receive the brochure along with the container. Newsletter- A newsletter will be developed to provide residents with information on the performance of the program. The newsletter can also be used to highlight the other methods residents can use to reduce their waste stream. Other Brochures - In addition to the program brochures, two other brochures will be designed and made available to residents. The first brochures will inform residents how to make environmentally safe shopping choices, one will discuss 'Pre•cycling', which is reducing the amount of waste placed at the curbside, and finally a Directory of Recycling Services will be deveoped. Community Events -National and state recognized events such as Earth Day and Recycling Week will be used to inform residents that curbside recycling is coming. School Presentation -The Integrated Waste Coordinator will contact all Rancho Cucamonga schools to oNer presentations on recycling that will also high!ighi the curbside program. Speaka/s Bureau • Letters will be sent to all community groups end organizations notifying them o} the availability of a speaker to discuss the City's plans far reducing the waste stream. I `~5 Proposed CltyWlde Curbside Recycling Program February 27, 1992 Page 7 of 8 + 'B/ock Leader Program -The City will solicit volunteers interested in serving as a spokesperson for their neighborhood. Block Leaders will receive periodic updates on the program which they can disseminate to their neighbors. The Stock Leader Program will allow residents to become actively involved in the City's recycling efforts. fiscal lmoact According to a Biocycle article, 'Cost Analysis of Curbside Programs" by Dr. Barbara Stevens, the costs of curbside recycling programs are determined similarly to the costs of regular refuse collection. For example, both residential refuse collection and curbside recycling operate under similar principals. Each system uses large vehicles which have similar maintenance and operation costs and troth require vehicle operators with similar insurance and benelit packages. Akhough there ere expenses incurred in any curbside recycling program there are also revenues generated from the sale of recyclables and savings from avoided tipping fees. However, staff research has identified that the components of curbside recycling economics are net enough to offset the costs of providing curbside recycling services. The following is a summary of the estimated costs associated with a residential curbside recycling program for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's 27,600 single- family homes: Personnel $ 308,00D Maintenance S Operatbns $ 319,000 Capital Costs $ 246.000 Total $ 873,000 At the current market prices, rt is estimated that the sale of the co-mingled recyclables will generate approximately $91,000 annually (Appendix G). The program will also experience a savings in landfill tipping fees, since the amount of refuse deposited into the landfill will decrease. This savings is estimated to be /~~ Proposed City-Wlde Curbslde Recycling program February 27, 1992 Page 8 of 8 $119,000 annually based on data received from the yiiot program. The savings in landfill tipping fees and the revenue generated from the sale of recyclable materials will be used to oN•sat the costs associated with the program. To fund the remaining costs it is recommended that a $2.00 residential recycling fee be collected from all single-family households. The Ciry will review the rate annually to insure that the curbside recycling service is provided at the lowest cost to residents. Residential Recycling Program Costs $ 873,000 Tipping Fee Savings ~~ 19,000 Sale of Recyctables (910001 Total Program Coats $ 883,000 $863,()00 /27,81')0 single-family homes =$24.00 per year $24.00/12 months =$2.00 per household per month The Ciry wiN also provide for the purchase of approximately 30,000 recycling containers to begin the implementation of the program. Replacement of bst or stolen containers will be provided by the refuse hauler. It is estimated that at $5.00 per container, 30,000 will cost approximatey $138,()00. This cost of the containers could be amortized over a 5 year period which would be approximately $27,600 for five years. SUMMARY Curbside Recycling oNers the City an environmentally sound opportuniry to reduce the volume of refuse deposited into the landfills, thereby saving valuable resources that era currently being discarded. The implementation of a curbside recycling program is necessary if the City is to comply with the Integrated Solid Waste Management Act and succeed in obtaining a 25% and 50% reduction goal by years 1995 and 2000, respectively, q City-wide program will also raise the public's awareness about the landfill crisis and serve as a catatyst for changing our throw away mentality' to a environmentally sensitive community. Respectfully submitted, ~ G~/ GG (~( William J. O'Neil City Engineer "I ~~% tiGR ~~~ ` ~~ i c ~ ~~ - 4' ^ . ~~ `_ u5; y~ '~1tJ ._ V ~" v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,. t ~", 'g vOL~~.E~3 ~i __ ~L-_ y~- ~ ~ ap ~ ~ ~ N C - ~ar c 6 g9 p Y .Y .R O .? ~z~ ~ €R.E ,~x ~ _ _ c F ° ~ v O ~ ~ ~ ~ = E ` u ~ £ ~ e E ,R E o: Y `- X- - ~ g ~ ~ Z Z ~~ ~~~c 5 m°' ~~S ~c~' C~~~ x x S~ ~ ` F, 1 L s ; ` ~ W ~ _ ~ c ~ : Y z = ~~ I ~ 1 A. i~ -?--- a ~ WW p _ _ _ __ ~ 1 ~ ~ -' - I _ _ v ~= ~~ G Zp = = ` __ _ _ = u + 3 = ___ _ (J N O jC N _^ 00i Y .. ~ j t _A ~ =b~'~ rs~X$&a A ~ cQ~ese~3 W 2 _~tp s 3 N~~~ ~q~~ ~~ ayp CCt5~ !* ~~ € _ Y F p ~ ~ } ty, f ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ O Y L L~ ~ pM1 N E••~E + s ~! L ~fi ~CCn~YC ~~Fi t W ~z J ~ g~Y ~r~~ ~~~ p ~ P ~~s~~ Q <~~P~ ~~~~~ti A E ZE S~ F„ v ~~ ~g b~ Y ~~ ~s~~ vs~~ ~ ~~ g ~&44 ~s$€i6 ~ ~ s c P E `c r ~ C ; ~ X~ E ai ~ ~ ~,, ° ~~BF ~a ,_ ~~~ oi~~Q~~a ~iC ~ ~!'~5?~E9 V ~~~~aEP 2 g~ SyL W F~s9g'€ ~. 2. .b `~~~ ~~Y'.aY J~cSq.q` :~tk~% a°F v} cY~3~ ~ ~~ g~ ~~4 ~~~gA~ ~W §~55~ ~~~~88~ gg p W W ~Y'r~:`tl N~ sp~r~' ~ ~g~5a~~ p~,tgy~re, vW ga=~ °~ ~3x ~ ~ =r~~ ~ z5~s ~ g2 ~~~~' r1Q rs~~~ a a-~ffs ~lg4~sg~~ oo E~P~~ Wf 6~ a' V i S ~°) Px O N f r O A b O h N O ~y N O h p p p h l7 O ' O' SO O N p N _ O O O ~ N N ~ p !y O O O ^ O ~ ~O C ~ o ei ~j I ^ ~ ~ o m N YI p ~~s L ~ • ~ A N O N N p 0 0~ p N C ~ O N f~ O N C ~ ~ N h f ~ O 0 .- p Q P ~ N N OJT O N t0 N g ~ r O p m Ypf ~~j~1/ N N O n n m m P 1~ m ~ p o O N Iq ~ r O p N f N N J e ~ ~ ooe s «< Qao ~ ~ a 'na D O li ~', ~ S'I ~ ~~~' o, O O N N ~ Ol p C ~ ~E e s K $E i .vo of ~ e g 0 v N N w ~ ~ F ~ - o s ~ s : a~ . I ; I ~-~ E E ~ o aE a .~~Kt r j oi~s ~ r g f G'I 0 C 0 :: .~ 0 G r L O ?' ~ U 3 d ~a ~~~ LL A a w ~= E G d d Q i = ~ ~ ~ Q ~ xo en N m e v yi e a? a~ a o° n E 0 a f_ C O 9 O O O m 5-8 •~o c°ye O.N ~ C~ C i r O V Z ~~ i x a O >? ~ C7 ~ a y ~ Q W W g Q! V F: ( j ~ R j 0 m ~ w ~' V v W~ ~ = n S WQ C7 2 ~ J ¢ "~ ' ° ~ gN e Z a C~ p ~ ~ ~ pE p W ~ a pa~ p W Z P ^ F ^ t o ~a ~ E~ s r~$ ~~ ~ € Q p W ~ $~ 8 ~ £ ~ ~n. 5 F ~ p ~~ N g r Zz~ ^0 8_ ^ ~a J ~ ~ ~ h m }m~ V 2 W ~ ~ _ ~ W o- 3 0 y m~ ~ i E NW ~ @ ~ ~a ~ ~~c4 ~pg ~ ~ Q $ ^ ~ C ~ ~~ ~~ _m ~ p p S~ .~.~ ~u' a g3 C y y ~- N IA Appwdrc F 1 Survey Container S+t-Out 1 Wrk 980 E9% 2Man4 300 Y2'L 1 Monts 128 9% TOTAL 738E 100% Container Sln roe sm.tl !E! 3!x 3utficient 903 EB% Too lage E 0% TOTAL 13ET f00% Proynm Informatbn Yr 11 E2 86% w fET ux rorAL 13aa loox Eneourapernant to ReoycN Cofrvanianee IE3 18% 544 Law 27 2% EnNronment 11E! 70% TOTAL 1EE! 100% Envlronmontal BanaRta rr 12ET 2a% ro 31 z% TOTAL 131• t00% ~~' I PNe 1 sst O N Y N O O n O a 4 O Im9 ~~ s n N Y N M N~ M N M ~ v Q a W C O ~ N O O O O W ~~ N M n N M O M . y ..N vN 7 pa o ~ o 0 0 o n o 0 0 ~ N N O YON N O = Y o n r ri .~ o ~ N o ' c ° o ' w 0 N Y w 1- W a n x y u ~oodai~ei $ y • gy EE U = W i. 9 ~ p M 9 f n !O~ U j C 2I<`-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~.~T r-cbn~a.y z7. I9vz CCI'Y OF RANCIiO CIiCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMQPf COMMISSION MINiJ'IES A regulu meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Envimnmenel Menagemrot Commission waa herd m Thursday, Febmery 27, 1992, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Ceder, located u 10300 Civic Ccntu IXi'vy Rancho Cucamonga, Califemia. The meetng was Wkd to ede u 7:00 pm. by C'bert Jut Williams. Prasent was Commiuioraxs Stephtn Boma, lobo Dunlap, Leslie Riggs (arrived 7:10 pm.), and Chan Jack Wiuiams Also present were: Lirxla D. Dankfs, Deputy Ciry Maoagv; Diane O'Neal, Mvuq{ema: Amlyu 8; loe O'Ndl, City Fnginar. to Lynne RteYr, inaguud Wane Coordimsar, and ]an Sa[toq Smet1>Qyy. Aluent wa+ Commission: J. Michael Lm, who was ad of bwa u a aatfaeaa •~~. ~• No anootatcaaerua a prexaaadae was made. •r~~~• C 1. Mary Lynn Widw, reddeot of Marlbeough Yi1L0. sekd she vsa new in rise community and asked if there was etatiuia oo who percentage of tcddeon recycle, aM if baaiowea wee regtored m recyck. Cherc W Bliaras sated thu iofamatieo would 6e coveted doing the public hearing item m curbside recycling. ...~.~ D1. ARpROV 7.OF rat: lantery 23, 1942 MOTION: Moved by Dunlop, seconded by autos m approve the minutes of ]ustery 23, 1992. Mo[ion camel unanimously, 3-0-2 (Lee, Riggs abaeatt). ~~~~.• F' Fnvaomrtenhl Maoegemem -2-~~~~~ OF19Y1 Commission Minutes El. RFylEW OF PILOT C[nlRClDF UFCY IN•PR ah' Staff report pcsrnted by Jo Lynne Pereyra, Integmt[d Wok Coordinator. ~»w Conunissioner Riggs arrived m 7:10 pm. ..~w Chan Wigiaw asked for clerificatim m the mvimmnenhl shopping source, to Lynne Pereyre, WegmtM Was(e Ceatdinarar, stated the caocett is fa the Cataamer o he 1rlnre cnrtscious whey they are shopping to purchase ikms m recycled or recychbk materiab, a parchadng items that tern be ta+se4 nke cloth diapers over dispoabk diapers. She staN it was .o mite them mote aware of how m tMom the wasvaueam. Shc shkd Ihese mocepn would be coveredm tlx: precyck bmrbtve. Comrmssipcr Dmlap asked B dtae wrre soy devils yer on the oewsktkr and public edrcaum programs, Jo Lynne PCteyra Integrated Wok Coordkntr, statod rhry mve tkt diacaeed aU the devils yet, not the newskrmr waukl probably go out an a bi-amual buu depending at the mm invdved. commissioner Dunlap asked if the 52.00 fee would be eaoug6 to cave the ceah of the progam, and how long it Would Stay ru tmt level. Jo Lynne Paeyra, Integra6ed Wnk Coudirwor, shred tlae would probably be coat of Irving ianeasn. jrut n Yw see with the residatial refuse collection vow. Diane O'*Ia1, Management ArWym D, shkd Uk fees would he revkwed amuWy, end a wa too soon k know i( 52.00 would 6e adequate, but tltm would be the rare far the Ctrst year whether h wa emogh a rot. Coramitsiwkr Dunlap asked if W the war IYdva monarN wh6 the emnomia tf the pupam. 7o Lynne Pereyra, Inkgro[ed Wale Cootdimter, steed the hatrlera Nava aB reviewM and approved the pmgmm, Commiaiooer Barra asked for chri5catko on Ute relatiotr betwcn the billing and tipping kea, and how that wodred a a savhy for the progam, and who world be admktiaernsg the tea. to Lynne Pereyn4 hfepakd Was CooNinmar, claiGed the iNarrertian pramM in the stiff repot on that topic. Diane O'!gal, Myngrarcot Amlyt B, slued the City would be involved is rAa ecaeamin. Ilrc hauler would pmvide the bills and collect the tea, bat the evaluodpt ere the propam would 6e dam by the City. The City will revkw whx wa paid fa the cammoditka, wmt the meskeh were m snot dme, wmt the cons were, and then bong an evaluation back m the Commission m the ead of the yet. Cotnmitsiooa Baum stared the the haulers would 6e covering the rapihl soma for etptipmatt and billing services. ea. xe esired how many trnclh would be hattdlktg each rook. would itjwt he one. toe Avakien, Yuknne Dispaal. sated shay would be using faro truth fa tlteir apamion X57 F~rvvonrrwiml Manegaren ~ 3 - ~ J 9 !~i FT ~~npJ~~~ Commission Minutes Michael Arroguin, Rancho Disposal. stated they world also be usin8 four trucks. Commissioner W illiams asked alvu! tits dcciption of mined paper that was given b the brochure. He stated that when he separated out all of his paper products floor the trash, odic dun newsprint, it reduced the bulls of his vash by mate dun 50%. He tclt they needed b expand dreir defuution of mixed paper. Io Lynne Perevre, Integrated Waste CoorJinaor, snaM the mmem defirdtrm was cmtusing m the asidents, and they rcceivW comments on be survey about tier. so surf would be malting tlret clearer (err the msidaiu when they went Citywide with the program. She stated they would h hest stamping what irons could lx recycled on the sides of the containers b help the rzidenu. Commicsbrrc Riggs asked if they were krokirtg at a plan for commercial recycling. Jo Lynne paeyn, Integrated wave Caadinamr, nand once day have the tssidalial cmMide recccling program up and running. they will look at staring a canmercial recycling program, n educating busirressea on how to set up they own source reducticm pmgrans. She sated they will ebo be looking a a green waste recycling prog-art! for the residenn. Commissioner Riggs sated possibly tier Commission could help out when it came m speaking a educaing cammrudry groups. Cbav Williams asked if they was cortsiderhrg udng mne dun oa conaioa. Jo Lynne laereyra, Integrated Wane Coordirubr, sated that nova eitia that sratted with a mWtiple bin system are switching ro co-mingled programs due b advarrcas N lechnoloBY at the seAing plants. They felt it was also easier fn the tr-skJenls m co-mingk commodiha and would arraease partieipetiao. Chart Williams sated du[ he hoped tits newsletler would emphasise b reaidmu drat would Idce b handle Nev recycling diraiy m rake tAeQ mmmoditiea b a recycling cents so due the City woWd receive its credit for source tcdtrcdan. Jo Lynn Paeyra, Inregnled Waste Cnargruta, stood they wanted b do a bmchue dret would provide a directory of serviua, such a, wherethe tool btry-beck codes wen located. Commissioner Harris asked what world be tits timetable for implementation of the pmgraut City-wide after City Courted approval. Jo Lynne vereyra. Integrated wane CaNinaar, sraed if the Canmiuia! approves the popam bnight, it would go b City Courci ao Mach 18, l992. If the CartrcH approves i4 then it would aka appmximatUy five oracle b ceder canmirrra and orgatiae roeein8a she stated they p1n ea slating the program on 1Wy 1, 1992 with tits new fiscal year, and start conducing rrdghbaftood workdrops N May b try b reach the residents beforo dray start heir summa vaatiorts. Chair Williams opercd the meetlng fa public haring. Arddtaanrg the Cnnmissim were Ron lohnsotl, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, fell the 52.00 a month fee wet so low and hoped it woWd be eneugh b nrri the program. Fie asked Ore Commission why wouldn't they pass such a program. He felt it wn needed ad strongly siypodcd eking the pmgnm City-wide. 158 Fsvhmnrenul Marugemcm - 4 - ~ ~ ~ ~~Febn~1'~~~ Commission Minutd Chair Williams sated thew intcodon for dre public hearing was m receive input From the commumity on the program. ;rot m necessarily dmY impkmenudon of iL Mary Lynn Wicker. Madhaargh Villm, asked if busiocaxs are pardcipadng b dris rxycling program. Jo Lynne Pereyra. Integrared wade Caadirmta, stead racy do have plans m dmgn a comttrercw recycling program. She styled currently it u just volmury for the businesses ro recycle, but Ne City has been getting a lot of intekest from the bushress community an how they can set p pm@aors. Mary Lyrm Wicker also feK they should educate dre children oo ra:yclhrg and product Imowledge as they would tx she consumes o[ tae futue. Susie Crisvmn, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, asked R drere woad !w some type of ordinance (or fact food rcWamann dwang with thch Crwd packaging. Jo Lynne Pueyra, bmgmad Wmu Coadireta, stated slut would be crnsideed ss part of the name rckluction element Aaron Keety, resident of Rancho Crrcamonga, drought they 1hanW have the in~rxtiaoa on the rpnuareas sirce people bogie thew dxhrrrw. He stand his empbyer does s bt of rctycBag and hoped than otlrer busirreaes would akso. Ron lohnvon, resident oCRarcho Cucarrwoga, asked that They be more specifs b edrrcadng people on what dreg should and cmr recycle. Roger Holley, Weston Wave, agreed tlul caeeemer awareawa will be impaeot b the future, and spoke ahora dTe waste reducdoo rcgTdremenn of AB 939. Comrrdssbar Dunlap asked if the 5200 per tagoN chsge vn campnbk b dhel crow ro tlw mw wiN similar ~&arru Roger Hdky, Weston Waste, sated the chrgea rtrm from 5150 b 33.00 per meoN. and mt determined by des olio of rrsutcebk matuiela. He saved it akv depeade m it these is mvenue sharing with the City. Chair Williams asked about ao article he lad and that sated that some landfills, when Ney reach they daily allameat, seM the Kash nnseks b other wdKlks, which would add m the cast of hauKng That trash and reduce recycling revenues. Ffe asked Isaw thrt would aRect the recycing program and the lower tipping fa when they reduce they wasldIDtbs. Jo Lyrme Paeyra, to0egrtltd Waite Covdirrtu, paled they wem rant wosidvieg • baser upping foe, what dwy wee dealing with was the d6vaaoo rY mrtaiala from Ilre wapepteam eo tlrCTa wrrald be kwa ~, and the: world cause a savings. She awed she dPDmB fda rt all IaodfiW m tae avert cod of Sao Btmasmro Camty were she same. CmwitdaTer Borgia anted even dsough the pica paid hx the cammodrtia b volatile, he felt it world rra have as much of an impact on dte reaidarn and their monthly cape a it miglr appear, to Lynne Pereyn, Integnkd wage Caordinatrr, swell Nam u a calcuhdao used b figure der, and curbside ~YCWg P~~ uauBy W~a12646 of whit b being pill fa rdideodal tefine calkctioo, so k was right in that it world not affect the residcnn der much u fu u the cosn. ~~ ~Mm -5- ~'~ ~' ~ F~~~~d LY There being no furMa comments, the public hearing was closed. Conunicdoner Riggs asked V it wadd be wise W include a stnaII tee for education uuveach to Lymte xeyra, Integrated Waste Coordinator, slated a padon of We 52.00 fa u stared fa educadon. MOTION: Moved by 1)uNap, seconded by emmt m rttanmend the proposed curbside recycling program m the City Cotuzil for cansideradon. Motion curried urenirntztsly, 4P1 (tee absenQ. •~e~~• Fl. Co inner Herres stated he hea tried W embct Mart Jahnstoa at the RpiVt Br~rye, but ha8~gulkn a CanmissiatKr smmd he has contacted fevenl wmmuoiry grays b spend tlr. wad abynt the rekbradm. Fte asked if drat cwnt an the nmtba of trees that have base pmchaxd. / i~ Diane O'Neal, Managem Amlyst B. staled tfpy do not love the final tbun[ yeC but Woe wi0 probably be between 15-ZO bees. ~ Commisaona DtmlaD stated if Wey not boa succeeaful in cmteLty~ Mak lahro[m. Wey might want to pat a prey release iogedra Diane O'Neal. Management Atulytt II. StalM sh N der newspaper about the akhradw, bra felt u b he said he woWd put someddng press mleaae aiso. Commissioner Dttttlap asked if they could get s about dk event i who have purchased Imes in order n contact them Diane O'Neal. Managemxt Amlysl tI. sp(ed the dryers was advised b(he Ume tley ptvrLaxd Wev tray, but staff could contact tlertt ypro and remind ACRON: Repon nxtived and •~.~.• F2. ' Commission felt they ahatrN dissolve all previau snboommittera, wild We ezcep of the Tex Task Face and ~ AwaNS Suhcammitfx, std m fat tlee CMv set w subcammitsem as the arose. diems stood aha rtview the old IiX of atthranunidea k saroM theta was several that ov~ppe4 duties. times noWins wu being done 6euuae each subcotmninee thought the other tote was handlvrg it. l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONUA STAFF REPORT DA'C E: March 18, 1952 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Covr.cil rack Lam, City Manager FROM: Brad Bu 11e r, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner ~_. BUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure III-7, Master Plan of Trails, regarding cer rain trail to cati ors. F`7V IFONMEN TAL HSSESSMENT IvND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFI^ PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA - A proposal to amend Figure II-7, and Figures IV-1 through IV-19, regarding certain trail locations. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure 5-18 and Figures 5-20 tlirou gh 5-a0 regarding certain trail locations and to amend Article 5.33.200 regarding Conmiuni ty T[3515. P.F.C:, N.MENDATiON: Tile Planning Commis si.on and staff recommend that the Pity council epp rove t!ie proposed amendments. BACKGROUND: On October 15, 1991, the City Council approved the Trails In~lementa[ion Plan. These amendments are follow-up items nece seita ted by the Plan. The purpose is to make the trail route ezhi bits ~dithin the General Plan, F.t iw anda Specific Plan and Industrial Specific Plan con: orm to the trail alignments included in Lhe Trails implementation Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed said amer,dmenis on January 22, 1992, and rerommended approval. The attached Planning Cowr.ission staff report and nu notes described the amen dmen[s in detail. Res ly cy ed Rra B er City Planner ea: CITY COVNCIL STAFF REPORT AMENDMENTS March 19, 1992 Page 2 Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of January 22, 7992 Planning Commission Minutes of January 22, 1992 Fl gore 2 - Hikinq and Ri di no Trails Master Plar Figure 7 - General Bikeways Plan Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-74 Recommendi nq Approval of GPA 92-C1 Pla nninq Commission Aeso lotion No• 92-15 Recommending Approval of ISPA 92-01 Pianni rq Commission Resolution No. 92-16 Recommending Aporoval of ESPA 92-01 Proposed Reso lutiott for GPA 92-01 Pr opoS ed Ordinance for ISPA 92-C1 Yrooosed Ordinance for ESPA 92-Ci (o a u1I? yr nrtivunv 1, ut. v:vlviv t>:-I STAFF REPORT r- DATE: January 22; 1992 ~ T0: Chairman and Members of. the Planning Commission F kO M: Brag Railer, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Wren tip ai Planner SL'&i EC T: E!NIAON MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OF AANCRO CUCA MONGA - A proposal to amend Figure III-y, Master Ylan of Trails, regarding certain trail locations. ENVIAO?lN,EN TAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN '~ AMF^.JOMEN^_ 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMON GA - A proposal to amend Ci gu re II-7, and FS yur es IV-1 through IV-19, regarding eer to i.n trail locations. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ET IWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OE' RA;;CNO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure i 5-1A and Figures 5^20 through 5-d0 regarding certain trail locatiors and to amend Article 5.33.200 regarding Community ' T tails. ABSTRACT: The proposed amendments wcu ld make the trail ale gnmer,[s shown in the General Plan, Industrial Area Specific Plan, and Etiwanda Specifrc Plan cons in tent with those contained within the Trails Implementation Plan approved by the City Council on October 16, 1991. ANALYBLS: Tl:e Trails Imp lementatinn Plan established precise alignments foz hiking, rid in q, and biking trail routes (see attached Figures 2 and ~). These trail re~~es were selected based upon a member oY criteria including safety, feasibility, functionality, T.radi ti onal trail routes, aesthetics, traffic speed ane volume, etc. T'ne. Master Plan of 'Prat la contained in the General Plan, which was the basis Eor the trail alignments shown in Lhe Industrial Area Specific Flan and Etiwanda Specific Plan, indicates only general trail alignments. For example, the Master ?lan of Trails does not indicate which side of the street the Community Trai la should follow. In add;tion, si rca the adop±ion of the General Plan in 1981, changes have occurred in Lhe community !i. e., development patterns, street classification„ and traffic vo lumesl which necessitated rethinking the trail routes. Through the development of the Trails Implementation Plan, all trail routes were re-evaluated based upon the aforementioned triter ia• Trails have been added to certain streets, such as the Hike Lane or. Rase Line Road. Trails were de fisted along some streets due to inadequate width or other criteria. In some instances, the trail o la ssif ice tion was changed, such as from a Dike Lane to a Bike Route. l~3 AMEN DMEN Ts CITY OF PFNCRO l'UCAMONGA 3anu ary 22, 1992 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: In reviewing the environmental issues connected with the proposed amendments, staff rotes that the amendments will provide consistency betweer, the General Plan, industrial Area Specific Pi an, and Etiwan da Specific Plan. Ir, addition, the amendments w i11 not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuis an res or si gnzf icant adverse environmental impacts. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in the Inland 6'a 11ey Daily Bulletin newspaper. RECOP4fENDAT LON: Etaff recommends that the Planning COl~15510n adopt the attached Resolutions reco~mnending approval to the City Council. Resp lly s ed, At db r City lann BB:DC:js Attachments: Figure 2 - Riking and Riding Trails Mastez Plan Figure 7 - General Bikeways Plan Resolution Reco,mnending Approval of GPA 92-01 Resolution Reconmending App rooal of ISPA 92-01 Resolution Recommending Approval of ES PA 92-01 ~~ AYEa: COMMIES IONE~R$i NOES: COMMIES IONBd9: ABSENT: COIOtI S9ZONEA3 CHITZEA, MCNIEL, MELCHEA, TOLETOY, VALLETTE NONE NONE -Berried . _L• CUCAMONOA - A propoul to amend Piqure III-vr Master Plan of Tial L, regarding certain eta11 locat LOne. Staff rarammende iuuance of a Negit ive Declazai ion. M. / - CITY OP RARCNO CUCIIMONGA - A proposal to anrnd Piqure II-7 and Piqu[e• IV-1 through IV-19 segardlnq certain tail lacationn. Start reoonmentl• iuuance of a Negat ive Deoltratlon. ~,~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO ETINANDA SPBCI PIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA - A propoNl to amend Piqure 5-18 and Piqun• 5 ~0 thzou?h 5-00 regarding certain trail loeationa and to amend Article 5.J3.700 regarding Community Trail. Staff rscommandr iuuanw of a Negative Dec Lration. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, preuntad the ataf[ report. CommL^loner Chitin commended Mt. Coleman and eewrly NLUn, AaaocLaN Planner, for their work on the amendments to make the planet more accucau end eoneiatant. She heartily racaamende4 adoption of the amsndmente. Chairman McN1e1 opened the public hrarinq These ear no Grtlmony, so the hearing war cloned. "_ o[ion Moved by CDitlu, ueonded by ToLtoy, to recomavnd ieruanp of Negat ive Declarationr and adopt the rrnolutiona rscamandinq adoption of 6nvlronmental Auerasnnt and General Plan Awndwn! 9Z-O1, anvizonmental Auennmant snd Industrial Arna Specltlc Plan Apndarnt, and Environmental Aenenament and 6tiwanda Sprcltic Plan Amrndmrnt 9Z-O1. Motion carried Dy the [ollowinq votr~ AYES: COMMI88EONERB~ CNITIaA, MCNIEL, M[LClIER, TOLBTOY, VALLETTB N063~ COMNI88IONERBt NONE ABSENT: COlDII88fONEABe NONE -carried Commiuionrr Tolntoy praised Mr. Coleman for him work with the Trail• co®ittee owns the yrars. Chairman McNLel notrd Uat the Lugue of CQ itornia Clt lrr had zerenely publlnhrd an article from Mr. Coleman ngardinq traLL. PLnninq Comals•ion M1nutH -10- Janu sty 22, :997 /(~5 ~, ''(7~ _ . ~w ~ ~5~~#§ oc a g ~~~{~i$~g ~ ~ 3 F g~&9~^~~ N ~ ~ ~ l~~~~;~~ ~, Z J z o s ~€ ~a~~~~~~ Z Y~~ as W ~~~~ ~_ ~ a ~ ~ ~ W ~~~~~~~F~ «~ g a ar~~Yy p ~' ~'~~ o g~3~~' g~ ~~~~~y~ja~ a ~~e~~~~ ~~~~iaj~~ ~~ ni ~ ~5L ~;ai ~ L! ~~~a~~~ ~i~a€~~ ~ co .. i a ~~ ,~ a ~ ay ~ •~ Y£ 7 ~ d ~ ¢ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ E3 ~~r~~- ~ ~ W ~ Z o € ~ ~~~~~~aY 5~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~_ /W~ Y Q ~ - z ~ye~~~r~s~~ i~~i~~~ i~rn~i~~ a ~~ _ _ RESOLUTION NO. 92-14 A RESOLUTION OP TER' PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOHEtENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN NASTER PLAN OF TRAILS (FIGURE III-7) REGRADING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES WITHIN TEDI CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Rec Stale. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92-01 ns eeeeribad in the title of thi• Recto lotion. Hereinafter in thi• Aeeolut ion, the eubj act General Plan Amendment is referred to act "the application.^ (ii) On January 22, 1992, the Planning Commiuion of ihs Clty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hssring on the application. (iii) All legal prerequieitas prior to the adoption of this Rssolut ion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFOA6, Lt U hereby found, dstvrminsd, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fallow[. i. This Cammiu ion hereby spsclficelly [ind• that all of the fecb get forth in the Recital •, Part A, of this Reaolutlon are true and eorrsct. 2. Baead upon eubetant Sal evidence presented to this commission during the above-referenced public hearing on Januety 22, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public test imony, thi• Commission hereby 0psclfieally finds as follows: (a) Ths emandmsnt pertains to the incorporabd aru and sphsts- of-influence eras of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (6) ThL amendment does not conflict with tM Trail Policies of Ghe General Plan and will provide for development, within the diet[ tct, in n manner consistent with the General Plan and with rs1eU4 devQopment; end (c) ThL amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Public Pecilit Se• El saunti and ~d) Thi• amendment would not G matsrislly ln]ur SO~t or datrlmental to the adjacent propsrtLN end would not hays a •ignlficant SmMCt on the •nvironmsnt nor Ghs surrounding propsrtlo and that tssuancs of Negative Declarer ion is recommended. 3. 9eeed upon the substant lal evldsnes preunLd to this Commission during the abOVe-rsferancsd public hear inq and upon the spscif lc t:nd loge of Eacte eat forth ir. paragtaph• 1 and 2 above, thl• Corission hereby finds and cone luds• act follows: ~/ PLANNING COlL4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-.-4 GPA 92-01 - CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONCA January 22, 1992 Page 2 (a) That the proposed amendment would not have sign iflcant impacts an the environment nor the surrounding propert iea; and (b) That the proposed ama ndment i• in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commie9ion hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, Eurther, this Connive ion heseDy rreaamands issuance of a Nrgativs Declaration. 5. saved upon the findings and conclusions err forth in peragzapha 1, 2, 3, and 6 above, this Ocmmiseion heteDy reeolvu es follows: (a) Tha Plannlnq Coronission hereby rscoamende that the Clty Council approve and adopt General Plan Amendment No. 92-01, modifying Piqure III-7 as shown in the attached Exhibits A and e. (b) That a csrt if iad Copy of this Rualution and ratted material hereby adapLd by ehs Planning Commission shall Ds forwarded to the City Council. 6. Tha Deputy Secretary to this Commiu ion shall cart ify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND MOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OP JANUARY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CL•CANONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plenninq Coamielion o[ the Clty of Aancho Cucamonga, do heteDy cart ify that the toregoing Ruolution wu duly and regularly introduced, pee sad, and adopted by the Plannlnq Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a raga lar nesting of CN Plenninq Commission held on the 22nd tlay of January 1992, by the following vats-to-wits AYES: COMMISSIONLRS: CNITIEA, MCNTEL, MELCFBiR, TOL51'OY, VALLETTE NOES: COHMISSIONLRS: NONE ABSENT: COl47253IONLA3: NONE «q RESOLUTION NO. ?2-15 A RESOLUTION OP THE PLANNING COHNISSION OB THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALZFOANIA, RECOMHENPING APPROVAL OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-01, AMENDING FIGURE ZI-7, AND FICVRES IV-1 THAOVGH IV-19, REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES, AND HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THBREOF. A. Recitals. (i) TRe City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application for Indu at rial Area Specit is Plan Amendment No. 92-01 as described in thw title of this Reed lotion. Neteinaftar in this Asaolut ion, the aubj set Amendment ie referred to ae "t Ae application.' (ii) On January 22, 1992, iRe Planning Conmission of Lhe City of Raneho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on tRe application and concluded ea id haarinq on Lhst date. (iii) All legal prsrequ ieitee prioz to the adoption of Chia Rsaolution have occurred. 9. Resolution. NOW, THSRBPORE, it i• hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commieaion of the City of Rancho cucamon9a as followr. 1. Thi• Coemlu Lon hareby speciflully finds that all o! Lhe facto set forth in tN ReoltaL, Part A, of thL Resolution are true and correct. 2, Based upon suDatantlal evidence prusnted to thi• commission during the above-rshrenced public haarinq on January 22, 1992, Lncluding written and oral etatf rspozta, together with public taatimony, Chia Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) TRe application pertains to Lhs arse included in the Indueirial Area Spec if lC Plan? end (D) Thls amendment will modify certain trail routee for coon Latency with the Trails implamentatlon Planr and (c) Thia amendment will provide consistency with the General Plan Maeie[ Plan o[ Trails. 3. Euad upon the substantial wldence presented to thL oommieeion during the above-referenced public Rearing and upon the apscLtic fintling• of facie cat forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Camsiulon heaby finds and concludes as lollown (e) TRat tM amendment will provide for dwslop:osnt of e comprehensively planned urban community within the district that ~l- cuDericr to the development otherwLe allowable under QternaL requLtione~ end I~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. )2-i5 ISPA 92-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 22, 1992 Pago 2 fib) That the amendment will provide for development within the district in a manner coneietent with the cenaral Plan and with related development and growth manag¢ment policies of the City; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of traneportaticn faeil it tee, public unlit ire, and public services requiretl by development within the district. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, thin Conmti neion hereby recommends ie su ante o£ a Negative Declat at ion. 5. Raced upon the findings and conelueiona set fcrth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 6 above, this Commission hereby ra solves a• follows: (a) The Planning Ccmmieaion hereby recommends ^_hat the City Council approve and adopt Industrial Area Specific Plen Amendment No• 92 -01, modifying Figure ZI-7 a• shown in the attached Exhl6it ^A"; and modifying the related Subarea maps Piqure• IV-3 Lhrough IV-19 accordingly. (D) That n Certified Copy of thU Aeeolut ion and raLted~ material hereby adopted by the Planning CommLaion ^hall be forwarded to tM City Council. 6. The Secretary tc this Commiaeion shall certify to the adapt Lon of this Reao lotion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OP JANUARY 1992. PLANNING COIytI55I0N 0Y TAE CITY OP RANCHO CNCANONGA BY: ATTEST CNlrman I, Brad Bul lot, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of RP ncho Cucamonga, tlo hereby cart ify that the [oregolnq Resolution was duly end regularly introduced, pa/pd, and adopted by the Planning Commiu ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of rho PLnnlnq Commiaslon held on the 22nd day of January 1992, by the following Vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, NIELCNER, TOLSTJY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSYONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 92-i5 A RESOLUTION OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION OP TH8 CITY OF ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 92-01, AMENDING FIGURE 5-18 AND FIGORES 5-20 THROUGH 5-a0 REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROVTES AND AMENDING ARTICLE 5.33.200 REGARD ZNG COMMUNITY TAAiLS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recital e. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe initlatsd an application for Etiuanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-01 as docribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in ihL Ruolut ion, the subject Amendment is referred to as "the application.' (ii) On January 22, 1992, the Planning Cosmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted s duly noticed public heating on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (Sit) All legal prsrsquis itee prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. e. Reeo lution. NON, THEREPORE, it i• hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commieeion of Ue City of Rancho Cucamonga a follows: 1. Thi• Conmission hereby epecltycally finds that all of the facto set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of thin Resolution era true end Correct. 2. Hnsed upon auDetant Lal evidence pruented to this Commieeion during the above-referenced public hearing on lsnusry 22, 1992, including written and oral staff report e, together with publ lc ieetimony, this commie eion hereby specifically finds ae follows: (a) TM application perialn^ to the area included in the ..,...ands Wren Spec ific Plan; and (6) This amendment will modify certain trail routes Eor coneieteney with the Trall• Implementeiion Plan; and (c) This amendment will provide consletsncy with the Genera]. Plan Master plan of Ttaile. 3. seeed upon the euhetant ial evidence presented to this commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the epecltlc findings of Ea cis set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Comsl ss ion Mreby fintle and cone ludee es follows: (a) That the amendmene will provide for development cE a compreheneivsly planned urban community within the district that i• super for to the development othezwlu allowable under alternst• requlatlone; and l 7~- PLANNING COMHiSSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-1b ESPA 92-Oi - CITY OF RANCNC CUCAMONCA January 22, 1992 Page 2 (b) Thai the amendment will provide for deveiopment within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and witR related d¢ve iopmant and growth management po liclea of the Clty; and (c) That the amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilit tee, public utilities, and public eery is ee required by dove iopment wit hin the district. 4. This Commieeion hereby finds that the project has been revlewad and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, Eurt her, this Commies ion hereby recommends issuance of a Nvgat ivv Oeclarat ion. 5. Baeed upon the find ing• and conclualone set forth Ln paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, thin Commie vion hereby reao lees se follows: (a) The Planning Commieeion hereby racnmmends that the City Council approve and adopt Et iwanda Spvc if is Plan Aaundmvnt No. 92-03, modifying Figure E-1A as shown in the attached Exhibit "A^, modifying the related street ctova sectiane Figurev 5-20 through 5-40 accordingly and modifying Article 5.33.200 a• shown in tl+e attached Exhibit "e.^ (b) Thet a Cert if led Copy of this Asaolutlon and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commieeion shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Secretary to this Commieeion shall certify to the ndopi lon of thLe Reeolution- APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANVARY 1992. PLANNING CONNISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA I, Brad eullvr, Secretary of the Planning Commioion of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify Chet the foregoing Resolution Wee duly and regularly int roducetl, passed, and adopted by the Planning CommLelon of the city of Aencho Cucamonga, at a regv lar meeting o[ tM Planning Commieeion held on the 22nd day oY January 3992, by the follwing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMNISSIONERSt CNZTIEA, MCNIELr MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CONHISSIONERS: NONE i~3 RE SOLUT IDN NG. qa. oc~q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCLTiC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-D1, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN MASTER PLAN OF TRAILS (FIGURE ITI-7) REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO NCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT ThEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has files an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter ir. this hes olution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred ^_o as "the application." (ii) On January 22, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Rea olution No. 92-14 thereby recommending to this City Council that said application be approved. (iii) On March 1R, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (i v) All legal pcerequisi tes prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. D. Resolution. Now, THEREFORE, it is hereby Bound, de terrtdned, ar.d resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council he: eby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Rea olution are true and correct. 7.. This Council here 6y finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental ¢ua lity Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 3. Rased upon aubs4antial evidence presented to this Council during the above-r of erenced pub}ic hearing including written and oral staff rep Arts, this Counc i.l hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is su Ltable for the uses permitted in the proposed diatri ct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and ~~~ CITY COUNCIL RF.SOLU'P ION NO. GPA 92-01 March 18, 1992 Pa qe 2 (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant adverse impacts on the environme,^.t and the surroun di ng properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance witrt the General Plan• 4. The Crty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Ge r.e ral Plan Amendment No. 92-D1, modifying Fn gore TII-7 as shown ir. the attached Ezhibi is "A" and "B". 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ~~ ~¢ ~ G ~ isr? ~~E a i~~~En s ~~~~~~~ : J 7 - Q 4i a E~~. aE ~ e= ~ 3 Q ~ y$y ! # ~y5 F !~ j 1 ¢ i i t I m ~qg~~~ s.si~~~'e~~~aH Q Q (~~in€ i il~ i ~ ~~ ~= 1 f.i ~WWZ ~ ~t~} ~p~~' a c a', W Y J ~ a~ ipgp',~~~~~ il(E~~pp6 ~~~g'•~~jb ~ t > ~f(~~'i7~ ~~ ORDINANCE NO. ~ /V T V ti] ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT`.' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FOAM IA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-01, AMENDING FIGURE II-~, AND FIGURES IV-1 THROUGH IV-19, :.EGAPL ING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) On January 22, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development District Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 92-15, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Industrial Azea Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-01. (ii' On March 18, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pu631c hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1• This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been revised and considered in compliance with the California Environmental ¢~ality Act of 797D, end further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council Finds as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district Sn terms of access, size, and compatibility wl th existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed District change would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment nor the surroundiny propertl es; and c. The proposed amendment i3 i.n conformance with the General Plan. ~~~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 92-BS March 18, 1992 Page 2 r Section 4• The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 92-01, modifying El gore II-7 as shown in the attached Exhibit "A"; and modifying the related Subarea maps, Figures lV-1 through IV-19, as shown in the attached Exhibit "B". Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation publication in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. r~9 ~w ~ S W y rg3yy ~ O=U ~ F~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ s~ ~~~ I O f .~ a £ ~ V (,1 ~~ It-~ ~N(~IT ~A.. FIG. IV-1 HAVEN AVENUE '~ OVERLAY DISTRICT Urban Center CIRCULATION t~ 120' R.O.W. ~•• 100' R.O.W. ~~ SS' or Isse R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE **'~'~+ Exlsttny «++-+. Propopd TRAILS/ROUTES = ~ ~~ o Pedeetrlen • s s • BIcYCq ~~--~--~ Re91ana1 / ~~ Muki-Uee SPeelal 3tnebeepe/ landscaplnp ......____...._ Powsr Llne/ UtIIkY Eeument Creak• d Chawleb ~ Sritlpe Acceo Polnte ' Perk I ~ © Fln Stetlon l ~ ~- t-- • J ~JI i 4I0 ep -_..i . _ ©- Acres 1~° --- " IV-2 0 400 000 1600 xete fIG. IV-2 MASTER PLAN AREAS '~ MASTER PLAN AREAS CIRCULA710N [~ 920' R.O.`N. ~ t00'R.O.W. ~~ 88' or Tess R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE +r+++ Existing «*~~. Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES - - ~ o Pedestrlsn • o • • BlcYCle ~ _,--. Replonal Muki-Uu BpeClel Stnetecepe/ Landscsplnp _ _- Power Lies/ Utllky EaemeM '~ Cneb 8 Cbsnneie rum Brld9e Access Po1Ms tPark ~--,-- . Fin Ststlon (~ f --i ~--~---~ UI L-J~ ~_ lO _.. Acres ©p' 0- 00' 80~- 600 ~~ ~~~_Z. FIO. IY-~ ~r ~ ^ r n..~..e: vnru ~ ~~ M ~` ~~ O .caber.. T CNCULAI'1DN - t 20• R.o.w. ~ 100' R.QW. ~~ es' a N.. a.o.w RAL SERVICE AT T11A~8/ROUTES O O O O FWNErWt • ~ ~ • BkycM ~~L7 ~ ~ u ~. Y-1 ., Aee.w HoM. © ~~ o god eoo' teoo' Nob: Fsrc.l Mn.s sno bt connpv.tlons sro .nown .. .ppoaimotbn Dory. s,,,~w~.r Cr..k. • CMnn.M ,.J c P.rk t -0~+••~~ Sp.eYl 36Mbeap.i .~++~.-v LatO.c~N 'TM .4..tlonm m.N not w euruttM own.o nor w tf» bc.tlon .le..p.ck. Tlt. o.pktbn of ..R. N .n YIAC.00n of . popcOW fW~ n.W Ut.t m.y b. .olwtw ov.r trlt. .. en. Clty ar.bp.. "P~-?~~ Iv-I~ ~. FIG. IV-4 Revised: 9/7196 ~ '- subs C9iCULATION - 120' R.O.W. ~ 100' R.O.W. 88' or bas R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE ~;~-T~--FF Eaiating ++~~+-+-~ ProPOead 3 7RAN.S/ROUTES O O O O Psdestrbn • ~ ~ ~ Bbytb /~ ( Regbnel "' Mutt{-Ua~ r •••~ Creeks 8 Channels Park 7 I_J 8rldg~ f 1 ..> Accese Polnt^ "`>~'"~~^-~ Sp~cbl Streetacapr w-~.~..~ Landstapig 0 G00' 800' 7600' IThe akea shown may not be tuneMfy owned nor is the Nota: Parcel lines and bt Conf. locetbn ske speC9b. Tha d~plctbn of a ake is an rgurations YWkatkx7 of s pro}ctW Ar9» rtiad Mat may ba are shown as approximation only Iy 22 adWebd over time as the Ctty dwelopa. ~( ~~~~ Flo. Iv-e CIRCULATION 120' R.O.W. e~ 100' R.O.W. ~~ 88' or bsa R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE -F-f-~-}-~- Existhlg ++tt++ Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES O O O O PetlssUian ~ ~ • • Bicycle n ~Qd M h 9 ul t l:se Special Streetseape/ ,qro.,~~, Landacapf~ °^•••••••^•••^• Power Line/ .. .................. Utility Easement Access Polnts © ~- 0 600' 800 1600 Note: Parcel Iines and bt conRguratlona are shown as approximation only, ty-32 Revised: 10/3/90 Y 1 Q -== s s ~ d c c K S ~ & o I I ~~ ~ ~ Si + ~ o • :~ 1 + i O • i~ ~ ; L v~ IV-28 E ~Fyy ~ $E ~~ 2 ~ y3y i ai 0 x $-'~ ~ ~~$ ~ ~~~ ~ EBB $ 3 8;~ n ~ ~=o 8 ~o~ i g~3 S€E © ~ ~~~ I~ C ~ ~. ~~ l LL a € a3 s ,'~F~ € - ~ ~ , W ~ d 85 = y ~ n ,:.. ~° c a l- ~~ ~~ ~y t{ ~~~ spa Eff e;L ~:t ;'Y $81 i~$ 8P~ IV-38 GX ~h ~i, FIG. IV-8 CIRCULATION ~ 120' R.O.W. eat 100' R.O.W. ~~ 88' or !eee R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE __, _... Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES . - = ~ Psdeetrian eee • BlcYCb - -~- Regional MuRI-Uw '- Special Strsetacaps/ ""'"''"' Landecapinq -~~••-~:--~-~ Power fins/ ................. Utility Easement Crsska 8 Chennala ~ Rrldgs Acues Poinb (Park © Firs Station Navsn Overlay Dletrlct s -- 0 400 800 1600 iney trio to .a ~ i . iz Note: Parcel Ibse and bt conRplratbrw are sfrown n approxknations only, (,C ~ i11I ~'• 1Tha ekes s7wwn may not M czar ownN nor h fM locatbn e1M apscMlc. Ths dapbtlon o1 e DNS k m bdlcatbn of a Propclad afore nsM Mat mey bs edJueNd over tYns as Ma City dsvebps. IV-42 j _. ~ , ~ ',. M33tl] tl3153v>Oi v3 wltl~l v3~ F ~ $ - a b ~ 4 as ° .. ® ~ \~ . 6 j [j E ~ _ §x u d ~ o i ~L T 0 • iw Z t f ~ yy: di£,~ f5 } JW ~ S o tl a~ S ~ s. A / • F I 1i i O ;.. oo; y ~ ~ a g }t O O 4 °_ °e l y' w d e~ u' I 1 a . ~ Y° $E 1 3~ ~a ooJ _qq ~~E ~.~ ~;V Yg$i sE: 22y ~'n~_Q~, ~V-47 8 > , LL ~~ ~ `u ®' Q ai = 3 ± ~ ~[ T ~ 3~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 9 @ ~` ,. 1~ .I i d e c e ~' e ~ ~ ~ S ' I s u. a i E II ~ ^/op - o Y i 8 ~ IV-53 LL IV-58 -i = ~~ 7 8 `a ][T ~ B ~g ~ ~ ~~ ~~ i ~ _! : ~~ . :~ f ~ s o i d i d F a I~ g g 8e g W Y 3' tt II ~ $$ I` s' ~~ ~Y ;g1 BY E~ ~~ EY ~~! se ~o ~~ :- ~~ ~4 • ¢ y NS S~ V a 9 ° S ~ g ' ? j{'j 3 d - W ~ ~ e ~` s 3 ~ } o ~m wg Wye Via. ~.a3 S ~ 3~ f ~l6 t c~ ~I~~ 1 ~ 6 F - ~ l ;, ~ fV-64 3 r~ 5 ~YY Y~ S~ ~~ E~ :~ g,yy ~~a ~~~ Eft E :~ ~.i Y ~ggY ;EE ~~~ 2" ~, ~- f M r c~ LL q j ~ ~ ~ _ so 3 ~ 1 ~ ~ V V V I~ a ~ • ~L T~ ,:~.. i ~1 IY-6& ~, 8 ~~ Y q~y~^ 9yy! Y~ ay ~~aa. E~f aka _-& ~~t E5~ ~oY ~~s iaa~a F~~ "~- 13 ~~ ~• LL _ 3 3 ~ ~ =q ~~ ~ i • ~ ~ ~ s J W 3 ~ 3 $ S ~ I W s I: Fiv ~j ~ 'i y ii ~ N~ 8s xx _ § ~ 1 } e ~ Q ~ 9 ~ 4'l ii ~i~: ~= ~ ~~ ~~T~© s ~ ~ . _i~ ~a i• ~~ ~y ryy~ ~~~ 5~; Eii E;~ fit $E ~~t ~~ ~~_ I~ ~ I4-74 FIG. IV-1 S CIRCULATION 120' R.O.W. 100' R.O.W. ~~ 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE 1--F-F--1-I- Existing +~-ttt+ Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES O O O O Pedestrian • ~ ~ • Bicycle ~~i~ Regional Multi-Usa Special Streetscape/ ~+o-o.,e~, Lantlscaping '•••••°°°°•°•• Power Line/ ................... Utility Easement Access Points © ~~ o noo' aco' teoo' Note; Parcel lines and lot configurations are shown as approximation only, IY-.8 ~i< "B-l5 flevuec, 5 ~ 9a ~ o - f 3 b o l ¢ i ~~ : m~a 3 g 'n¢s~ s s ~ 'm uF ~~~ $o; $ ~ ~ W s , ~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ %= W' ~~ ~ , ~ 1 ~ ;C T LL $ ¢I r • ~I ~ F i y^ Y~ :2 ~Y ~E ~ ss S$ ~ ~S i ~ a'o !i ty~ 8 ;II Ei E; ~~~ y'~; i 7 ~°+ a~ S Et ~~~ /~~~ IV-84 3 ~ _ ~ i; p ° ~ s I i i{y •3 3 - N 4 ~ ~ i n d pp pp i w x n! $ 3 i. tz g +~ x $ a ~ c .. o _ °m m a d p} y ~ o~ a~ $~ n°3 u ~ ¢ 8 i c s • N t~ ~ N ~. I 1r w 4 LL V a I x • I I ~~ ~_ E" .~ $s ~$ &; EE $~ S£ :~ 5~ Ea 0;4~( F. /r ~~.°~-~ 7 IV-8B FIG. IV-18 CIRCULATION - 120'R.O.W. ~ 700' R.O.W. use 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE ~--~_ Existing ~+++++- Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES O O O G Pedeahian • ~ ~ • 8leycle ~C~ Regional ~ MultrUse LJ Brldge r1 Access Points 0 400r BOOr 1600 Note: parcel lines and lot conligurationa are shown as approximation only. .w~•••"r Creeks 8 Channels Park I ^"^'"'t""'~ Special Streetscape/ ^O'-'"`~-tee Landscaping IThe sites shown may not be currentry owned nor is the kxation site specYlc. The depiction of a ake is an hditatbn of a projected hiWre need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops, p/ ~'~-/gii 1 V-95 t. l~ FIG. IV-19 CIflCU4ALIOM _,. _ iRgL9 ROUfFi ~ t ]0' R O W P.O..blp ~ ~ G.M. ~ Cn.m.Y A!' or V u g 0 W R.plana MMF11.. -~ Aau. PeM. gAil SERVICE SO.cla Slrubcp< ..... F.b14p L.nO.uplrq ~ P«k~ propo..E Po.x L!mr UIIWY E...m.M Mul..«cN Mn...M bl cOn,IW «lan. .r..MwO .. pWn. h.lbn O~+r Ln. p...M.n mx ^.1 b. cwrp.h owmC nw !. IM roubon .n. pp!nc. rn. n.q.lgx p f ~ Q a .oo' eca' Q r' ~Ena' , / r'n- I . o • .n .Ialcnwn or . we1.cl.a Inv. n..a Inn m.Y e. ~ , I [Y-99 ORDINANCE N0. ~~~ I r AN OAD INANCE OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL`CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-C1, A.MEND ING FIGURE 5-18, ANC FIGVRES 5-20 THROUGH E-47, P.EGA RING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES A!iU AMENDING ARTICLE 5.33.2CC AEGA RD ING COMMUNITY TRAILS, AND MAKING FIN DINGS I`1 SUPPORT THEREOF A. Ae citals. (i) On January 22, 1992, the Planri nq Commi ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development District Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Flanr.ing Commission adopted Resolution No. 92-15, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Etiwanda Specific Ylan Amendment No. 32-01. (ii) On March 1R, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and conrluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordnance. The ri ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamnnya ordains as follows: Section 1. This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set Eorth in the Reci.ta Ls, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2. This rouncil hereby finds and certifies that the project has been revised ar.d considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Ne gatiw Declaration. Sect Tor. 3. The Rancho Cucamonga Ci ry Council finds as EolLows: a. 'Lhe subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Dis tri m. chance would not have si gn iFicant adverse impacts on the environment nor tY,e surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in ronforma nce with the General Plan. U " CITY COUNCSL ORDINANCE N0. F.SPA 92-01 March 18, 1992 Pa ee 2 Section 4. The City Council, of the City of Aa ncho Cucamonga hereby aoprcves Etiwan da Specific Plan Amendment 92-01, mo difyi rg Fi gore 5-18 as shown i.n the atta cited Exhi bit "A"; modifying the related street cross sec ^_ions, .°iqu res 5-20 through 5-40, as shown in the attached Exhibit '~ and modifying Article 5.33.20C as shown in the attached ExY.ibit "a". Section 5• The City Clerk shad certify the adop~ion of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (151 days of ter i`s passa 9e at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circa laticn publication in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of P.an cho Cucamonga. ~/ i ~~ + .. ...... ... .............r.....••• ... _~ a ... // ~~ ~~ '''i fF'- •••••• Equestrian Trolls III ~' Bike Lana• or Bike Route' ~ (On Pavement Shoulder) i' ~' ~~ ~ .~ Bike Path (In Parkway) III / `' .~a.~;;'' . - ,~ __ _ ;< Foothill Boulevard ~~ / = Specific Pian ~ ~^~; ' ~~~ Con~utt Tnll ImpNmomotlon Plon <~ ~' COMMUNITY 5-18' ~, ,TRAILS eovosEO -- ~N(81T 'A" 5.33 TRAILS AND WALKWAYS .100 intent It is the intent of this article to provide appropriate standards for the development of an integrated and continuous system of pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian trails and walkwevs' consisting of: ' - Community maintained Commmnty Trails, - Privately maintained Peeler Trails and Greerrwsvs. and - Publicly maintained PrAHc ~deweDo. .200 Com munity Trei)s .201 Community Equestrian Treiis shall be developed in locations specitieA in Pigure 5-18. Design Standards shall .be conalatent wiN Citywide standards es contained in the Trail Implementation Plan. .202 Community Bicycle Treil Improvements shell be developed in locations specified in Figure 5-18. Such bicycle trail improvements shall be consistent with street cross-sections, Fig. 5-20 through 5-40. Design StendaMs shell be consistent with Citywide standards as contained in the Trail Implementation Plen. .203 Community Hiking Treil Improvements shell be provided in locations specified in Pigure 5-19. Design Standards shell be consistent with Citywide standards es contained in the Trail Implementation Plen. No hiking trail improvements shall be necessary where used in conlunetion with equestrian trail improvements. Article 5.33 - Trails k Walkways .300 Feeder Trails .301 Feeder Trails: '~ Peeder treils for equestrian use shell be required as e condition of project approval in the EQ/OL District. Such trails shall be located within easements, and shell be designed to provide access to each lot or site intended for equestrian use. .3G2 Design Criteria: At a mitimum, each development should provide et least one connection across the project site, with the intention of providing a continuous system of equestrian Peeder Trails. The design o4 such trails shall be based on Citywide Peeder Trail standards, provided that such trails may be combined with optional provisiore for bicycle end pedestrian use, per Section .400 below. 5-34 ~Kl~i~ „~-.~'` ~r~ t. Y M: C~ r' r 5 bide ~.,~`' ~ IaMe ~,~ ti i ky w e!r't~t«appee to f' 1 mjtch Vic{prb PC T r~~i i2 \j~ S S~bike ~;"~ ~ lase .~°" ~f I ro ~ 9' 4 BASELINE ROAD FIG. 5-21 ,,~ 1 „ ~~ ARROW ROUTE FIG. 5-24 J c~.~.5 a?,p :ice 21 f • F ~~ w~- ~~QHe e w -~ 4 z.,) 1 ~~ mc~cvue~-~ ;o rc'rtu; c.cwwea s znca: c'. ETIWANDA AVENUE South of Foothill FIG. 5-22 ~nfc~ ai ~f~~ ~! _ ?,' ~ ~f r ~. ~` ~ J,.~. ~w ,' ~3 ~ ~vCC:di =GI~vOL~b :-` i~f(l~ _~ ~~ ~~ ~~m~. ; trcc evn. si $ bike /~P ETIWANDA A'/ENUE South of Baseline FIG. 5-23 61' ~Cb' 0.0N i3 i n. re¢ n x `yoe 17.Q C ~. t s-~i ~~ k, ~,3 - 3G[.".LLKS ~.~ z,- ~X, ~.~~ ~,F-xietlV!a' '. wi.~rM i I ' I°,Id' Nt Ti'C? ~ ~ - ~ 4yx A~ner~ ;. t •~~ W ~ ~, ('=~ i ri ;ree ~yr-~ A _,# a,ms=~ir~rg ~'/ ' ~+''. :fee .r~:x ..~.~' ,' ~a%P ren_ ' ~ ~ ~ r ic. Fy~ 5-24 I KL~ j, r~ ~ . i so.,c,a~, ssbac v~ cg Rav, 'Cn U',~lG ETIWANnA AVENUE North of SPRR/South of Summit FIG. 5-24 F.. n 1~'.`.Yi-.3i f f'f Sri'. ~ yi 5.2l. /~ .1 ~ ~~', I •~ ' ~ /` 4. ~~ ~-~ l Yl. i r . ~ ~ '~lIPOLry~C11E j ~ IXI5}YI$ DL PyeryS ~ // witF ~ a ~~~.,,~:• <<~~lan lrvi i .,._.. ;:u ~. _~er-a~ s=: r~_4z /fp. :~~ '~ ~~ 1' i, ~ «'~obrt~g' °~~K OdkS Rcr'n ee aow ETIWANDA AVENUE North of Baseline /South of SPRR FIG. 5-25 is' '~ s' t.: ~,~t Fer ~, ~panl sctiac.ks Rl, ^\ ^\ oe _! D ~~"1~rv~,'26 ~ u' S Xi~dc G „~ ~„ ~rrirrma~~ o,anr,r£s `? x 1 y~ :1 9 L ~Y ~f N ~r Vii/ ,4 r ~ ~,,. ,' IInC~. V~ v Rctk Gurb s}reet }rtes, varies V ~L per /YL~ ~.x.G{~cn5 u_ Concept for ETIWANDA AVENUE STPEETSCAPE Planting Guidelines ~:rePt tre¢s(~n public f~oU~l: pert.rcas-sew{ten tree schedule '-rcn} yard }reel: informal mix {y~c c~o ~Lcr~onPldtic,~Mendm~i " in~i 1 tree min./ZO'oF trantdSe 25% OF : ree° ~I'~a~ kr 24'"fix Size all c~~her}rees ~>hall be ~5 aal min ~~are ~n4°rl ',~rGs~api nE.' ~F+al be. supple men }:cl by anr~rcior~ale -=~~~.-`Y FIG. 5-26 b~Q~ .-P ... _d ~~ T trumq fj• A, ze.~~ >G~ S. SGT ~A\ r% A EAST AV WALL N'o^-al ;~ 'Cl TIX ~03 :{O PfI ~+ r rs.~ ~C SVL'd Ycw ~~ Ge RO'v~• ..'~, ~orc+a~7ct'ozc5 'a~..rm ~r~~,rrc ETIWANDA AVENUE • North of Summit FIG. 5-2 7 APE Rwb~d OctoO~r 19e9 anacm<NT EAST AVENUE FIG. 5-28 Cam. "~ _ 5 ,, r u. eow MILLER AVENUE East of Etiwanda Ave. FIG. 5-29 „C -~ „ ~~ MILLER AVENUE West of I-15 FIG. 5-30 ur, .i ~ -- . ~~ ---yam. ,, ~ ~- ~~ ~ ~ z-y,~ .ns ey~.r nL~ ~ ~y ' oeniht3 s ' 'W, \ ~~ r A• ;'„ ~j. ~, ~'~/; i~ b~~~E ~~.'; ~~ 1 ~,' • nixrc waJ3 ?1 bermv~3~'~ J°iaen:ai~5es ~ ' N ;' LRO.~e 30 ~caow ` RG ' ~` U/ HIGHLAND AVENUE _ FIG. 5-31 ~f ~pe~¢~ wir~i•ow hs' '' tad fna i~ ~'.~.:. "~ JL' Iti I ~ $~ vdY:fb ~ IWI"G1 LO lC 85MWp b~ WJW 24TH. STREET PARKWAY (west of ~oow~ FIG. 5-3 2 „~_~~ ~~ ..~.~ _ ~ __ ~: - `~ - ,_ ,.: ~ ~,. ~: 24TH. STREET PARKWAY Planting Guidelines `~~Y(E; l+'6S ~I Y! pIJG'JG 'Z~ 'fry ~ _, GYCSS -Se GS'IGn E ti"CC S~^e,^y (,~ ie /- P.Z /a 5 `.d. ="d Y'~i ceY :~;,e $-q.i ~- , ~ ~ ~ .- .. T,'-' ~_ `EZ. G ,.~.a.~ ~,3.'.: ~., ._,~.~°Y5 Btrc~^s ceY `?C }, ~hY ._ ~, _va~ >sr^t ~ ~~,te;5 _ 11 tr~~< ca_- , .. /w`%r+r '!'= w SGJ, J,dYI? $~ O.G. 7>.Y PG:I^,7 ", ~}I .SC; •_,l Yr1 ;6~]°: n< °rL-'~ „? SLI C'C uKif_I^:"il C~ ^';; YY C;" l;.S -~"1.".~i~ > FIG. 5-33 .~ . :_..r '~1 ~~` '.m+e. ~ ~ '~ 1 ca :n....,' ((/ ~ ~ Y?G ~ fi /~~ ~_~ ) {{ -~ i~.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.,~~ IYO..X T~~~~ J'4=~~-~,~_ SSW Between 24th and I-15 FIG. 5-34 vpP •- ld~r.Kw Styte \~~~ jr~N ;~ rte. a , i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y J vii ` ~ ~I a i!i ~ y.-~/-~ i, i,,~ bike ~-.- a h M ~ 1~ S Z VIA6 ~ `~Ab 27" j4' 2T ~, 2o'r r1o.,r. Im' ROW ~ Ih' < r>u 24TH STREET Between Loop and Cherry FiG.5-35A I. North side of parF.way, 20' ROW with 1 etTu¢strian traU, 2. South side of parliwny, 14' ROW with ~' biG.eway, Except Gettv¢ett Loop and San Sevairte Wash: a) North side parG.way 12' right-oJ-way with the trail [ocatad in adf scent LandscapesL [ot; Except across San Sevaine Wash: a) north side and south side parfiways may narrow across box culvert, but not Less than right-oJ-way for troi(s. ~~~ /C-Q 1J Iosys Ciol~.rv,.vr Types A \ FONTgNA ggNCHO }~ 1 CIICgMONGA /~ \ I g~b~ke 5 bike ~i lane ~ Irtiue N 69" 9D Rou 24TH STREET B~tvwwp CMrry 8 1-15 FIG_ S_~~Ft W ind.ow 6~~e /~yPeu B [ • Landscape th¢ flood controC easement, on the west side of Cherry ~ventte, to the top of the berm. r A CHERRY AVENUE FIG. 5-36 ~O.~nd {-L=aded t :ree iype,_ \ ~ bke / re~+~ ~ iL 4 y - ~ N 1 r h V ~ ~ -r~ tb Rqh• VICTORIA AVENUE West of East Ave. FIG. 5-38 uC /~ it VICTORIA AVENUE East of East Ave. ti `; ; w:ro~w ~~ st;-w . ~ . ~~t~,. A: SUMMIT AVENUE East o} East Etiwanda Creek FIG. 5-40 dir. 4C'12~~ SUMMIT AVENUE FIG. 5-39 CITY OF RAtiCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DA^. E: March 19, 1992 (\' y TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Sack Lam, AICP, City Manager .°F.OM: Brad Huiler, City planner HY: 'stove Hayes, Associate Plannec SO0.T ECT: APPEAL OF ETI WAN DA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMEtiT 99-U3 - U.S. HOME CDAPDRATTON - Appeal of the Planning Co~issi or.'s decision recommending denial of a recpa est to amend certain de ve lcpment standards withi r. the Etiwanda Specific Plan as d_scribed below: 1) To allow single family detached residential development within the Medium Residential District 19-1d d-w ellinq units per acre) utilizing Basic Development Standards; and 2) Tn reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 0,900 square feet within the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) under Basic Oeveiopment Sta ndazds; and 3) To reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 0,500 square feet Within the Medium Residential District (g- 16 dwe lliny units per acre) undex gas is Development Srandar as. APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACE 14211 - U. S. HOME CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a proposed tentative tract map and design review for the development of 226 single Family lors on 01.2 ages of land within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in the Medium and Low Medium ftes ide ntial Districts (B- ?4 and 4-S dwelling units per acre, respectively), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of the De voce Freeway and west of East Avenue - APN: 227-231-01, 09, 12, 16, and 32, 227-191-15, 227- 101-24, and 227-261-11. Related file: Etl Wanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-03. (r8n9l4~lDATI00: Staff recommends the City Council receive all public testy mony on the appeal of the Vesting Tentative Tract, the Desi yn Review theneef, and the Etiwanda Sp ecif lc Plan Amendment. If after receiving input nn the prop used projects, the Council concurs with Che f.indi ngs made by the P inn ring Commissioc, then adoption of the attached Resolu tiers of Denial for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the Desi qn Review thereof, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment wou 16 be app rnpri.a te. g11C1[GMIIDOND: On Dece ether 17, 1991, following a series of public hearings, the Planning Ccmmission re cortmen ded denial of the aSove-referenced Ces tinq Tentative Tract Map and continued the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment to a Planning Commission workshop on January 8, 1992. At the December 17 meeting, several concerns were voiced by members of the Commission. The primary concerns can be generally summarized as follows: CI^:Y COU"IC IL STP.FF REPORT VTT 14211 - 0.5• HOME CORPORA'IiON March 1&, 1992 Fa qe 2 Etiwanda Specific plan Amendment 89-D3: A reduced mi ni m'vn average lot size in areas zoned Low Medium end Medium Resident iaL using basic development standards wculd allow a sma_lez average lot size and potential higher density for "conventional" single family development. If other development standards (maximum lot cove ra ae, setbacks), are not modified, the result could be a more congested stree escape appearance, which is inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the E±iwanda Speci°. is Plan; This amendment, by =-Bowing a potential higher density for "cor.ventiona i" single family development, may reduce the incentive Eor developers to utilize the optional developmenC standards which are intended to create more interesting project designs by encouraging unit clcster ng and innovative techniques that allow preservation cf ample common open spas e. Posting Tentative T. Tact MaQ: 1. The proposed tents Live map vas designed to comply with the applicant's proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendments; hence, is inconsistent with current Etiwanda Specific Plan Development Standards; 2. The prcjnct does not incorporate the area required for the development of a neighborhood park; 3. The proposed "yr id" pattern of the site p1 ar, does not reflect a d<aign that would provide interesting streetscapes within or on the perimeter of the project; and 4• The proposed arci;itectu re does not exhibit the character of his Mric homes within the Etiwanda area. All of the above-mentioned items and other concerns relative to the protect are discussed in more detail in the attached December 11, 1991 staff report z'e9a rdrng Etiwanda ,North Sperif is Plan 89-03. These items are also discussed in the December 11, 19c2 Planet hg Commission Sta Ef P.eport regarding Vesting Tentative Tract 14211 and the Planning Commission minutes from December 17, 1991 and January 8, 1992 (sent under separate cover). Again, the related Etiwanda Specific Pian Amendment was continued to the January 9, 1992 Planning Ccmmission meeting. At this meeri ng, the Commission reiterated the same concerns expressed at the previous meeting and tecmm~ended denial to [he City Council. The Flar.n ing Commiss loo subsequently held a workshop to discuss stogie family residential developme rt standards and is continuing to pursue that issue. fe L'.nwiny zdopti nn of the Resolutions of Denial for the Vesting Tentative Tract and Design Review on December 17, 1981, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amen Ponent on January 22, 1992, the appellant filed a timely appeal [n allow the ~^i ty Council to consider the applications ae proposed. ~I~ CITY COUti CIL STAFF FEPO R9' VTT 132 i1 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION March 18, 1992 Pa qe 3 ANALYSIS: A. Etiwanda $pe cific Plan Amendment: The Etiwanda $pe r_sfic Plan Amendment is proposed to mo drfy three specif rc deve loomert standards as cef erenced in the project description. The amendment is necessary to allow de velopeaant of the related Vesting Tentative Tract 13211 proposed by 7.5. Home Corporation. At the time the application was submitted to the City, all three Darts of the amendment were needed to approve the related Vest ir.g Tentative Tract Nap. However, during the :e<ent public hearings regarding Land use wi thin the Etiw ands area, the City Council ee desi gna ted all nrnperty owned by V.S. Home Cor oo ra tion to _... ~-' Medi',:v„ eie s: ue n;..a i, hence, making parts t and 3 of the amendment (wF.i ch related to properties zoned M edi~un Residential) independent of the related tentative map. `low only part ? (: eduoing the minimum average lot size in the Low Medium Residential zone) specifically relates to the proposed de ve loFment. However, staff analyzed all three parts of the amendment to maintain the "hierarchy" of development standards from zone Co zone. At the December 17, 7991 Planning Co rtmission public hearing and the January e, 1992 workshop, the Conunission was concerned that the amendments would not meet the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to preserve the character of the Etiwanda community. In addition, the Commission noted that the affected areas should be designed to preserve histc ric elements characteristic of Etiwanda (Eucalyptus windrows, large yards, architectural styles and materials, etc.) Given these concerns ir. conjunction with the numerous srte constraints (freeway proximity, Eucalyptus windrows, etc.) in the affected areas, a majority of the C ortunis si ~~ers felt that this area should be developed with "innovative" projects that wi 11 preserve art~p le common open space. (These typss of projects are t}'F ically designed by ut iliziny t'ne Optional Deve lonment Standards, which allows smaller lots in trade Eor abundant common open space, hence, clustering areas of res ide aria: uses.) D. Vesting Tentative Tract MaP: The Vesting Tentative Tca ct Map is proposed for the purpose of developing a "conventional" 226 Lot single family subdivision on 81.2 acres of land rn the Etiwanda area with an average lot size of. approximately 8,685 scan re feet and residences can ging from 1,988 to 3,378 square feet. In addition, the 10.57 acre area south of the residential portion of the site is proposed for use as an interim detenr_ion basin and future neighborhood park site. At the December P, 1991 Planning Commrss ion hearing, the Commission did not approve the subdivision as presented because of concerns created by t'ne related Specific Plan Amendment. Without the amendment, the 'Icahn t,i ve Tta ct Map is inconsistent with the ~urcenf. Etiwanda Specific Plan Ueve lopme nt Stanch ms. In addition, the Co~mniss ion expressed concern with the "uri d" layout of the site plan and architec tv cal detailing. In their opinion, the site plan and arch itecture drd not adequately emulate the character intended for the Etiwanda area. Finally, the Conanissi on felt that. the required mini mom 2.33 acre park site should be incorp orat_d as a ~~q CITY CW NCIL 5T.4F'F REPORT VTT 14211 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION March 18, 1992 Page d lettered-lot cn the Tentative Tract Map to ensure its shape and location would be acceptable and its const niction would occur in the inrtial phases of this project. Given the numerous unresolved concerns, the Planning Commissior. determined that these applications would not create a specific oroject or future projeces consistent with the goals and objectives of the Etiwar.da Specific Plan. CORRBSP0NDSHC6: This item has been advertised as a pu 6lic hear ng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the Froject site. Ae sp ul/y itt , Brad Bu er City P anner BB:SH: mlg Attachments: Ezhi bit "A" - Letter of Appeal Planning Conarission StafF Repor` dated December 11, 1991, re gazding Etiwanda Spec>.f is Plan 89-03 City Council Resolution of Denial for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89-03 City Council Resolution of Denial fur Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14211 City Council Resolution of Denial for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14211 Separately provided to City Council: Planning Convnission Sta Ef Reports dated January 22 and J anu acy e, 1992, regarding E[iwanda Specific Plan 89-03 Planning Co!mniss ion Staff Aep ort dated December 11, 1991, regarding Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14211 Planning Commission Minutes dated January 22, i6, and E, 1992, and December 17, 1991 Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-192 denying Vesting T en to tive Tra r_t Map No. 1d 211 Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-193 denying the Design Review for Veat Sng Tentative Tract Map No. 14211 Planning Cormni ss ron Resolution No. 92-07 de ny inn Etiw an da Specific PLan 89-03 V e.~:. ;[aC y` x [ 4[ t ... o.., [, e. Reid & Hellyer .., r ,o~<i:oro,.., %IVHH9ID6. CALIPOBSIIA p1D0p-L'fpp December 19, 1991 ][[O . w[[t. r rl Ir wiv[Ilf'O [. G wif01 f IY ~. rrtw[O„ [ [N'~[ ~ Y«YM. G N[p o~, r..[ .,,..[, 00061-001 SAV'1' V2'A FJ~ffiQAL HrPRdSS Debra Adams, City Clerk CITY OF RAlw:tf0 CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tentative Tract 14211, U.S. Momea Dear Me. Adana: The purpose of thin letter is to appeal the City Planning Commission denial of Tentative Tract 14211 and Etlwanda Speci£1c Plan Amendment 89.03. On December 17, 1991, the City Planning Commission denied proposed Tentative Tract 14211 and Btiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89.03. We respectfully appeal this denial and request that this matter be scheduled for hearing before the City Council. I enclose a check for 5251.00 made payable to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely, ~/wctlvatxK.oox ~~ ~., ~I1Y OF RANCFiO.,CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION REZD b HELLYBR A OP8 9I0~ CO TION Charles T. 'chu tz TTCLE: ~ cj+[' of ~ ~ ~ 1y EXHIBIT:~~~~ SCALE: % ~~ CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAYSONGA STAFF REPORT C- DATE: Uece tuber 11, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of ±he Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ~ BY: Steve ilayes, Ass criers Planner SVBJ ECT: EI7VIAONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETZWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT A9-03 - 0.S. ROME CORPOAAT ION - A request to amend certain development standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan as described below: 1) To allow single family detached residential development w ith ir. the Mediua Aesidenti al District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) utilizing Basic Development Standards; and 7.) To reduce the minimum average lot size Erom 10,000 square feet to 8,900 sgvz:,n feet within the Lou Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) under Basic Development Standards; and 3) To reduce the minimum average lot size Erom 10,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) under Basic Development Standards. Related File: Environmental Aaseasment and Vesting Tentative Tract 14211. ABSTPACT: The purpose of these amendments is to allow "conventional" single famt ly detached residential development with Lot sizes cromparable to the Low Aesi denti.al zone of the Development Code within the Low M e~liurt and Medium Residential zones of the Etiwan da Specific Plan. The applicant (V.S. Home Co rporaticn) formally su h;a it red this application concu zrently with their application for Vesting Tentative Tract 147.11. It has been the Lntent of staEC to process this request concurrently with the proposed project, hence, the application has never been reviewed by the Planning Commission since the tentative map application was just recently deemed complete. On November 20, 1991, the City Council recommended that, all of the property owned by U.S. Home Corpora lion be designated Low-Medium Residential., hence, meY,inq parts 1 and 3 from the amendment description above independent of the related tentative map proposal; only part 2 from the above description is ze lative to their aubdivis ion proposal. PLANN iNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ES PA 89-03 - V.S. NOME CORPORATION December 11, 1991 Pa 9e 2 ANALYSIS A. ~~en eral The applicant is requesting three amendments to the Etiwanda Specific Plan as described above (see Exhibit "A"). Specifically, the amendments would allow this app Licant to prnress a 226 lot single family detached subdivision (Jesting Tentative Tract 14211; on 81.2 acres of land with an average iot size of approximately 8,685 square feet and a net density of 2.R dwelling cni is per acre- The tentative map has been designed to comply with the proposed amendments. The three specific facets of the amendment are analyzed as foi lows: 1. Allowing single family detached development in the Medium Residential Cistrict, Basic Development Stdndar ds: Currently, sin qle family detached dwellings and duplexes are onl allowed in this zone when utilizing the Optional Development Standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (see Exhibit "0'). The intent of the Optional Development Standards is to allow deve lopmen[ at the Upper end of the density ranges with minimal lot size end dimena ion restrictions in trade Eor usable, coamion open space areas that will benefit tl:e residents with In a particular project. However, the Etiwanda Specific Plan Deve Lopment standards as currently written do not allow the developer the option of incorporating the required open space exclu gi vely in private yards in the Medium Residential zone for single family or any type of development; minimum of 30 percent common open space and 40 percent total open space is required under the Optional Development Standards in the Medium Residential zone. The applicant contends, and staff agrees, the*. single family development with covmion open space facilities, which are typically maintained by a Nomeowne ra Association and require written Covenants, Codes and Reatrictivna (CCBA's) is not desirable to all potential homeowners in the anticipated price range. Tn addition, many homeowners prefer to have larger pri vote yards for their individual use and enjoyment. Therefore, the applicant concludes that the opts vn to build under the Basic Development Standards should be allowed in the Medium Residential development di stYi ct. Staff agrees that the standards should be more flexible to allow the de vetopez the option of building a conventional single family subdivision under bas Lc standards or a smaller lot subdivision with common open space under optional standards. Tf this portion of tt.e amendment request is recommended for approval Sy the Planning Commission, then Part 3 0£ th ie amendment request should be conoidored in conjunct ton with this recommendation. Again, th ie portion of the request is now Independent of the related project. a~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT F,S PA 89-03 - U.S. ROME CORPORATION December 11, 1951 Page 3 • 2. Reducing the minimum average lot size ` tv, 000 to 6,900 square feet within the Low Ned ium Resid t' 1 D' t t B Development Rtandards: In keeping with the goals and objectives for a more rural and sensitively planned atmosphere within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area, the adopted Hasic Development Standards are intended to allow development in the lower half of each Sens rty range. 8pecif ice lly, the established minimum average lot size of 10,000 square feet ir, the Low Medium District yields a maximum density of 4.36 d'wel ling units per acre for conventional single family residential development (see Exhibit "C") with a Low-Medium Residential density range of d-a dwelling units per acre. If *_he minimum average lot size were reduced to 0,900 square Eeet in this zone, then the maximum density wwld rise to 4.89 dwelling units per acre for this type of development; still well within the lower half of the density range. Also, it should be noted that the Basic Development Btandac da within the Development Code have been established with a much smaller minimum average lot size in the Low Medium Residential District (refer to Exhibit "D"), 6, q00 square feet. For comparison, a ma xi mum density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre could be generated in areas gover ned by the Development Code, significantly hicner than the proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment maximum of 6.89 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, if this portrpn of the amendment were Ce commend Ecr approval as proposed, the general intent for lower densities and a less suburban atmosphere would, Ln staffs opinion, still be intact. P Lea se note that the app Llcant's request was designed to meet the, needs of their ap ecific projecC prior to the City Council's action of November 20, 1991. Now that the entire site is designated Low-Medium Residential, the applicant would need to have the minimum average lot size reduced to 8,685 square feet or lower. If the Commission feels chat an even smaller minimum average lot size is appropriate (example: 8,500 square foot minimum average may allow a maximum of 5.12 units per acre, 8,000 square feet, 5.45 units per acre), then the Resolution for this amendment may be revised accordingly. It is staff's opinion Chat an 8,500 square foot minimum average lot size is appropriate in keeping with the general intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and will allow a s li yhtly higher density, yet well below the mid-point for established range. Re du ring the minimum average lot size fro 10 000 q re t to 8,500 square feet within the Medium Residential District, gas is Development Standards: a~ ~ PLANNING COMATS SIGN STAFF REPORT ES PA 89-03 - D.S. NOME COP.PORATI ON December 11, 1991 Page d Assuming single family development under Basic Development Standards in the Medium Residential District is recovvsended, (see item 1) there would be potential density of 4.36 dwelling units per acre with the current lot size standards, well below tF.e Medium Residential District density range of a-14 dwelling units ner acre (see Exhibit "C"). IE the applicant's request fur a minimum average lot size of 0,500 square feet was recommended, a maximum density of 5.12 dwelling units per acre s pos sable, still well below the minimum density for this zone. Conversely, density of 8 units per acre would yield an average lot size of approximately 5,445 square feet. In staff's opinion, it would not be appropriate to allow 5,445 average square Eoot lots in the Etiwanda Area for the purposes of al low inq "conventional" single family subdivisions at a units per acre since the density range for the Medium Residential District was established Eor multiple Eamily development (conaominlums, towMouses) or small lo[ single family development with ample common open space; "conventional" single family subdivisions were not anticipated since property owners typically prefer to maximize density. An 8,000 square Eoot minimum average, which would generate a ootential maximum density of 5.45 units per acre, is appropriate because it would allow more conventional single family development et a density that meets the intent and purposes of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Aga zn, t9 is portion of the amendment request ie now independent of ti:e related tentati vs map, based on the action of the City Council on November 20, 1991. B. Cumulative Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Pert II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of these amendments. The issue for considerat Son is an anticipated reduction o£ the y rop osed land use intensity: therefore, st. aff believes the impact of the type of development allowrd under the revised standards shalid not be more significant than originally described in the environmental review for the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Plan. If the Pla nn my r_oemnission concurs, then issuance of a Negative Dec La ration would be in order. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In ortler for the Planning Cosm~is sicn to approve the proposed amendments, the following facts Eor f:ndinga must be made: A. The proposed amendments will not have a si gnificant Lmpacr, on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Part II. gas PLANK iNG CDMMIS SIGN STAFF RE PGRT ES PA 89-03 - U. S. HOME CORPORATION December 11, 1991 Page 5 H. The proposed amendments will promote and further implement the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Sy helping to preserve the unique historical nature of the Etiwanda area through lower densities. C. The proposed amendments are co r~istent with the coals and objectives of the Etiwanda Sp eci£ic Plan and General Plan. D. The proposed amendments would not be materially injurious oc detrimental to adjacent properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been adver tilted as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the project has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDAT ZON: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89-03 and issuance of a Negative Dec la ra ticn to the City Council. Respe y submitted, Brad ller Ci Planner BB:^u H:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letters from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Etiwanda Specific Plen Ss ction 5.22.201 (Reei dential Land Uaea) Exhibit '•C" - Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-2 (Basic Development Standards) Exhib i! "D" -Table 17.08.060-8 (Basic Development Ltandarde) Exhibit •'E" - Development District Map of the Etiwanda Area Resolution of Approval far Etlwan da Specific Plan Amendment 89-03 Draft City Council Ordinance of Approval fox- Etiwanda Specific Plen Amendment 89-03 1 W L A WAINSCOIT 8 ASSOCIATES.INC. ~,..»-aa~ . . August 13, 1991 - RECEIVED - LITY OF RANCF1p CUCAMONGA BANNING DIVISION auo ~ a ~a~ ~~~ 4 Barnes mnay f. Gnmow PF a - s o.a~. ~~ro ~~~ ~c.r ~o dro(a .S Mr. Steve Hayes Associate ?larner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Subject: Tentative Tract No. 14211 Amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Dear Steve: In accordance with your request, wa are providing this letter regarding average lot areas with respect to our request for an Amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We are requesting an Amendment to the EAaeic Development Standnrde to allow minimum average lot area of 8,500 square feet in the current M Zone, and 8,900 square feet in the I]R 2one. We have checked these area calculations and believe they reflect the approximate average areas for our Tentative Tract Map. Please refer to U.S. Home Corporation letter to you of July 5, 1991, for additional comments regarding this issue. Sinyce-r~/el/y~, Eeith Dagostino, P.E. Project Manager KD:mh/51809E cc: Dallas Paulsen, U. S. Home Corporation ~d CIVIL ENGINEERS • UNO SV RVEYOR9 • PUNNERa 11111 MRiGN RGAG GMMO LEAMCE GIIfGANU 91J11 11 HI /}I.177S fAA. 1/11171Y1951, Cx +} ~ ~ rf' '~4 - i U.S. HOME CORPORATION WESTERN LA Nn DEVELOPMENT OIV ISION ~ taOpE SautMm Sune >W • Tempe. grizone 85291 1991) atB~l ]9 JuJ.y 5, 1991 Mr. Steve Hayes Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Tentative Tract No. 14211 - Amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Dear Mr. Hayes: Y U.S. Home Corporation on behalf of the Etiwanda Developments Corporation provides this letter as an update regarding our letter of August 16, 1989, requesting an Amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Our request regarding single family dwellings in the M Zone, Item No. 1 in the August 16 letter is the same. Regarding Item No. 2, we are requesting an Amendment to the Specific Plan to allow an overall minimum average lot area of 8600 square feet for Tentative Tract No. 14211. We are making this request in consideration of the upscalinq of development in the M Zone, and the loss of usable land created by the requirement to provide a regional detention basins for the entire Etiwanda Specific Plan area. Please note that khe development density for this project is oniy 2.8 dwalling~wtlta per acre. Significantly less than the allowable 4-8 dwellings per acre range for the LM Zone, and 8-14 dwellings per acre range for the M Zone, as outlined in the specific Plan. ~~g C~ ~'i3 r '%~-a Paqe 2 Mr. Steve Hayes City of Rancho Cucamonga July 5, 1991 Attached for your reference is a copy of the Auqust 16, 1989 letter. If you need additional information to process this request, please call me at (602) 838-4178. Sincerely, U. S. HOME CO®R~/PEJORATION ~`~~Ni"' VE MENT DIVISION € ~is~// ~ Dallas D. Paulsen Executive Vice President-Project Manager DDP/rc cc: K. Dagostino L.A. Wa inscott b Associates, Inc. ~•~ 9 L15•MOI'1'1O August 16, 1989 Mr. Dan Coleman Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 707 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Dear Mr. Coleman: USF~ JN iuE NEN qFM SippM EMCX•N(E U.S, Home Corporation on behalf of the Etiwanda Development Corp. request that an amendment be made to the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the following items: 1. The footnote on page 5-5 be amended to allow single family dwelling in the Medium Zone. Very Little M zone exist in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the areas that are within this zone are surrounded by single family homes. We feel that this change would serve to compliment existing surrounding zones. 2. The Basis Development Standards table be amended to reduce the minmum average lot area from 10,000 s.q. feet to 8,200 square feet. This would not reduce the minimum lot size but would allow a smaller average than that on the LM zone. Enclosed to process this amendment is a check in the amount of $3,247.40 and a copy cE the project and surrounding areas detailing current zoing, I£ additional information is necessary to procasa this amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan, please call me at (714) 944-0761. /S~i~njcerel ~~ Mela i~nsley ~~ Vice President Western Land Development enclosures ~~ ~X ~Iv _r. /~" MVEMIOE OIVISIOPo te7Y4 CammcwN Gntn D,, 9uiU Zi0 • RuicM CuumugE. G 91 TJ0. (ltd i 9N~OI6t 2Dl Resdential tine>: US^c DISTRICT ~ ~ ER YL L I.M M ~ Single Family DweWngs ... ........ P P P P P'~ ~` '~~ ' ~ ,--~ ~ a Duplexes ....................... P P P P P+ , Tri 'u Fourplexes ................. Pr P+ P P P ~ ~taltiple Family Dwellings........... P+ P• p+ p+ p ~ .202 Other Uses: ; Temporary subdivision sales offices and ~ temporary structures subject to the 1 provisions of the Development Code , . , P P P P P ~ Group Care facilities for seven or more ; persons subject to the provisions oC the Development Code ................ _ _ _ C C ; Nursery schools .................. _ _ _ C C ~ , Churches ....................... - C C C C / Clinics, hospitals. sanitariums, end ~ nursing homes ................... _ _ _ C C ~ Parochial end private schools ........ _ ~ C C C ~ Private, nonprofit libraries, art galleries, ~ and museums .................... _ _ - C C 1 Private, noncommercial clubs and lodges C C C C C / Public utility end public service ~ structures and instsilations .......... C C C C C ~ Home occupations ................ P P P P P 1 1 Fami:y care facilities for six persons or 1 less ........................... P P P P P 1 1 Incidental and accessory structures and 1 uses for the exclusive use of residents of 1 the site end their guests ............ p p p p p 1 Keeping of horses [or personal use on 1 lots of 21/2 acre or more ... ~ ........ P P P P - I Note: Symbol • indicates uses permitted in conjunction w ith optional development 1 standards only. ~3I 1 i ~~~, 1 5-S I ER VL L LM M Lot Area: A; oo raoo mmimurn average 40,000 25,000 15,000 .1,0; 30U y&,g06 (in square feat; Tinimum 30,000 20,000 19,000 ",290 ",200 (in square feet; Number oC DU's 1/40,000 1i 20,000 I/10,000 1/7,200 1/5.000 (per lot area in 2 maz/lot 2 max/lot 4 max/lot ~ maxi lot 4 max/lot square feet) Lot Dimensions: minimum depth 135' 135' 100' 100' i00' minimum width 120' 90' 80' 60' 60' (at required front setback) minimum frontage 60' 40' 40' 40' 40' (at front p.l.) Setbacks: front 40' 3C' 25' 25' 25' side street) 25' 25' 15' 25' 25` side 20/20 10/20 0•/20 0*/LS 0•/15 Tota120' Totfl115' Total l5' rear 40' 30' 25' 20' 2U' Lot Coverage 20% 25% 30% 40"6 40% (maximum %) On~ite Windrowsl 100'/ao SOyec N/R N/R N/R (in lin. feet,iac) Streetside N/R Required Required Requir_d Required ~P~g (prior to occupancy)2 Height Limitations 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' • O lot line not to be used et project boundary 1 Existing lots of record of 1 acre or less may be exempted from this requirement. 2 Custom Iot subdivisions may be exempted from this requirement. BASIC X31 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Fig. 5-2 _„on i:.Jd.040 B. Basic Development Standards. The tollowiry3 table, Table 17.08.040-B secs forth minimum development standards Cor residential development projects filed up to the mid-point of the permitted density range. TABIS ITA8.N1 . s BA$iC DEYELOPMYNr STM'DARD9 (N/R a Y0T REQCTAED) YL L LN M MN N LOT AREA: \LRiiLNLTA NE7 AVERAGE 2L 300 B, pOC 6000 N/R Y/R N1R ML\1NVM Vyr 20, 000 ], 200 S, 000 I0, 000 N/R V/R WMBER OF DWEILLYG LMIS (A) LYT02 LPTOI LP T06 LP TO 11 LP TO I9 LPTO Z] (l~.NTI'IFD PFR ACRE) N1NUILTA D3VEL.I.YG L'NR SIZE: (D SLYGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND 1,000 SQ. FT, tkO REGARDLESS QF DIS•,RICT DETACHED DWEI3I.YGS M LiTtPLE FAMILY OWELLLYGS (1) EF[1CLElYCY/S1'LDIO 330 SQ. Fr. REGARDIE95 OF DL4IRICT OtEBFLROIX.I 650 SQ. Ff. REGARDLESS OF DLSI3UCT TWOBEf)tO/l.1 800 SQ. . REGARDIS93 OF DL9TRICT THREE OR MORE BEDROOMS 930 50. . REGARDLESS OP OISIRICI' L07 OUfEh'SIONS: MINIMUI.I WIDTFI (@ 90 AV0. 6J AVO. SD AVG. 80 N/R N/R REQUNFD FRONT SEI'BACR) VARY H- 10 VARY +/.3 VARY +/-3 MIN. CbRRFIt LOr WIDTH 100 70 SO 33 N/R N/R WNLNUN DEPTH 130 100 90 100 N/R N/R NTNLNL?1 FRONTAGE 10 10 30 60 Y/R N/R (@ fl20N(' fltOPFRTY LCJE) NUT, FUG LOi FRONTAGE 30 20 20 30 N/R N/R (@ FRONT PROPFXTY 1111E1 SETBACKS: (8) FRONI'YARD (C,E) 12 AV0. l]AVO. 33 AYO. 37 AV0. N/R N/R VARY H-3 VAAY H-5 VARY H-1 VARY +/-3 CORNER SIDE YAAD 37 Z7 22 37 N/R N/R INTERIOR TIDE YARD 10/IS S/10 S/10 10 N/R N/ft D REAR YARD JO 20 IS 10 N/R N/R D AT I~TFRIOR SITE BOL7iDARY 30/$ 30/S IS/S 1!/3 IS/S IS/3 (DWp1.ING UNIT ACCESSORY (0) (D) (D) 9LDG.1 03.E -76 (9/i/88) YICi OR IA 5?AFE' _ _, _.~_ __----_ L = VL r ___ VL / .......mT~~-: . r..-.--r' - LM E -y / ?coq-•. ~-. \\~~~\~~,\~~`// -~.Rca - .- LM -~ rw-•~«-.•.-~ P Mr /{mm.4~J .CO M. ~• ~, t~ Etiw•nd, Specific PI•n - Ameodmenta 91~W LM ~----r OP ~ ~ 'l ti ~_~ ~~Py~ ~+ -_? Reg.Rel.Comm;_C.Comm. Regional Related-6¢mm ",~\ \ ~.. I foothill Blvd. Spe mfic PI•n Amentlmenta 9102 LM ~, LM - District Doipn,lion ~y ~ ® PAOPEAilES CUARENiLY / DESICXAICD Y(EDIUY norther portion RESIDENiIAI CA-14 D7EllIXG UNI15 PER ACRE) UNDER ~d, ~ COXSIOERA110X OA REDESIDNAiIOX i0 LOY YEDIUY RESIDEN11Al I4-0 OYELLIXG UNIT} PER ACRE] 1 ESPA Sub•re• Noa her port n~ ' FSPA Subarea Noa ~• o` sob.r~. ~.m., naea Perc.la t : i~ f)F F2.4XCFi0 CCCA.'~10SGA ITESt ESPA 97-03. FSPA 97.02 - . ..:'•.\\1Vr [)1'~'FC?(1\ ~~, TITLE snemhc Pl.n Amens Ueo,non M•P ~`'' _ RE SO L'JTION ;i0. lq ~l,b~J~ RESOLCT IDN OF THE CITY COUNC iL THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA, CALI FO RNLA, DENYING OF ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, A REQUEST TO 4.MEND CERTAIN DEV ELCPMENT ST A::0 nRCS WITHIN THE ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLA.N~ ,LND MP.RING . I:i DiNGS IN SUPPO R'P THERF,O F. ,+. Recitals. fi) ll.5. Home Corporation has filed an application for Etiwan da Speci Eic Plan amendment No. 83-U3 as des cci bed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiw an da Specific Plan Ar,.endme nt is r^f erred to as "the application." (ii) On Dere rt~Der 11, and continued to December 17, 1391, the Pla aping Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed pa blic hearings on the applicaticn. The Pla nr.i ng Convnission continued the application to January 8, 1992. (iii) On January 8, 1992, the Pla nnin, Commis Sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga !rondo clod a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heau nq on this date. The Planning Commission directed that a Res oiuti on of Denial be prepared Eor the January 22, 1992, meetir. g. At that meeting, the Planning Con¢nission adopt ed its Resolution No. 92-07 thereby recommending to this City Council that said application be denied. fiv; Tile decision represented by said Planning Commrssion Resolution was timely appealed [o this Council. (v) On the 18th day of March 1992, the City Counc i.l of the r_ity of Rancho Cuca moo qa conducted a duly noticed public heating and concluded said hea nag on that date. Evil All ie gal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occv rre d. B. Res elution NOW, TFIE REPO RE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the P'lamrirta-~Wm ircian-o£ the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: ..~~. 1. This Eenmd.ss-ion hereby specifically finds tha± all of. the £acls set for tF. in the Recitals, Patt A, of this Rea olution are true and correct. 2, Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced March 18, 1992 pu blxc hearing, inclu diny written staff. reports, the minutes of. [he above-referenced Pla nninq Commis Sion meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-07, Ch is Council hereby specifically finds as fol tow s: 2 ' CITY CC UNCiL RESOLUT.ON N0. ESPA 89-03 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION March 78, 1992 Pa ae 2 (a) the app l: cat ior. applies to all properties located within the Law Medium and Medium Resl den ti al Development Districts with In the az ea gc verged by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (bi The Deve iopment Code pe rmi^_s detached single family residences only utilizing the optional development standards, as currently does the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (c) The amendment does conflict with the goals and policies of the 'c tiw ands Spec.f is Plan and General Plan for reasons as foilows: 1) The amendment to allow si agle family residences in the Mod i'am Residential zone under basic standards would reduce the amount of co mmo,: open space within individual projects, which is inconsistent with the policy fo:' providing ankle usable open space within the Specif ir, Plan Area; an d 21 The amendment would discourage the potential for project "clus terin q" for the purpose of preservation of open space; and 31 The amendment would rot suppoc[ the Etiwanda Epeciflc Plan policy of creating r. "country or rural atmosphere" by integrating natu ral areas with urban areas through a system of linear open spaces. (dI This amen 'anent will reduce the incentive to utilize the Cpt.ional Development Standards uue to the proposed smaller minimum average lot size and thus allow nigher densities for "conventional" projects utilizing Basic Development Standards in the Low Medium and Medium Residential Districts of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which contradicts the general intent of the plan for pro vi.di r,g a generally more rural atmos ohere gad st: en qth erring the sense of community identity within the Etiwanda azea. (e1 The amendment does net take into :onside ration other Interrelated development standards (lot coverage, set bac ka, etc.) which may directly influence the character cE projects and reduce the ability to meet ehe has .ic goals and ob7ecti ves of the Etiwanda SpeciE is Plan and Che General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during rhs above-referenced pu hlic hea ri.n g, including written and oral staff : eports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed application does not promote the gea L; and policies cf the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (b) That the proposed amendment wou ].d have significant impacts nn the environment or the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the General Flan and Etiwanda Specific Plan. d'~~ CITY COUNCIL RE80LUTICN NJ. ESPA 89-03 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION March 18, 1492 Page 3 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth ir, oaragraphs 1, 2, and 3, above, the City Council hereby deri es the application. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to ^. S. Home Corporation that the time within which judi eial review of the decision rep resente3 by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Prove du:e Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this ftes of ut.i on, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by cert lfied mai 1, rota rn-reco ipt requested, to *J. 5. Home Corporation at the address identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shill certify to the adoption of this Resolution. a37 RESOLUTION NO. ~~ A AESOLUT TON OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or' TY.E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALZFORN IA, DELAYS NG VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 14211. A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LJTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IN Th'.£ MEDfUM AND LJW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (9-14 AND 4-5 DWEL LIFG UNITS PER AC AE, RESPECTIVFLYI, LOCI+T ED ON T. HE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF ^FiE DEVCRE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IH SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-231-01, 09, 12, 16, and 32; 227-191-15; 227-tE1-24; and 227-2fi1-11. A. Recita's. (il 0.5. Home Corporation has filed an application for the approval rf Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14211 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as the "application." (ii1 On April 24 and September 25, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings regarding the completeness of the application. Following conclusion of the latter hear in q, the PLa nning Co noni ssion adopted its Resolution Nn. 91-141 denying the application without prejudice. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely apo ea led to this Council. fiv) Staff subsequently deemed the project application complete on October 30, 1591, prior to the hearing of on the appeal, thereby nullifying the action of the Pla nni nq Commission of September 25, 1991. (v) On the 11th day of De ce mb ez 1991, and continued to the 17th day of December 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public heaz rugs nn the app licatior, and, following conclusion of said public hearings, adopted its Resolution No. 91-192 denying the =pp li cation. (vi) The decision represented by said Planning Commission ResoLuti on was tim_1y appealed to the City Council. (viii On the 18th day of Mar rh 1992, the City Council of the Cr*_y of Rancho Cucamonga condo r. ted a duly noticed public hear inD and concluded said hearing on ;hat da re• (viii) All Legal prerequia ites paor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. D. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is heveby found, determined, and zee olved by the City Council of the C1 ty of Rancho Cucamonga as C'oi,lows: 238 CITY COUNCIL RESOL BT ION KC. VTT 14211 - G.S. HOME CORpD RPTION March 18, 1992 Page 2 1. This Council hereny specifically finds that ail of the facts set Eoc th in the Recitals, PaY "A," of this Res oluti or. are true and correct. 2. cased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council du zing t*,e above-referenced March 18, 1992 h.earin g, i.n eluding written staff reports, the mrnutes of the above-referenced Planning Co;mnission meetings, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-192, this Council hereby specif really finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property generally located east cf Etiwanda Avenue, south of the Devote Freeway and west of East Avenue with an Eti.w an da avenue frontage of 712 feet, a Davore Freeway frontage of 348 feet and an cast nvenue fronts ge of 414 feet on property zoned Low Medium R esrde ntial an9 is pies en fly uni fro ved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject sire a single family ze5i dent ial and vacant and zoned Low Medium and Medium Residential 14-8 and 0-14 dwelling units per acre, respectively); the property to the south of that site is single family residences and vacant and is zoned Low Medium Residential; the propetty to the east consists of single family residences ar,d vacant land and is zoned Low Medium Residential and City of Fontana; and the property to the west is single family residential and vacant ar,d is zoned Low Medium Residential; and (c) The application contemplates the development of 226 stn gle `.gaily resx deuces with an average lot size of 9,685 square feeT., and an interim detention bas ir. of 10.6 acres for the purpose of receiving drainage for this project as well as future projects i.n the irmnediate azea; and (d, The project as proposed wi 11 require ao pxoval of related Etrwan da Bpe afic Plan Amendment 89-03, which would allow lots of a minimum average lot size of 0,585 square feet or less (as amended) in the Low Medium ReSi de nt ral District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (e) The apn li ca tion as proposed would be materially detrimental [o the persons and properties in the inane diate vici r,ity of the proposed site for the reasons as Follows: (1; The Tentative Tract map as proposed does not indicate a lettered parcel of 2.33 acres or greater for the purpose of a par Y., which is the minimum requLre meet of the Quimby Act (a minimum cf 3 acres of park per 1,000 re sr dents) and Rancho Cucamonga Municrpal Code Chapter tfi .32, nor does the Tentative Tract Map reflect a site plan desr 9n thac would all ow this park to be expanded on khe_ conei guous property utilized as an Snterim detention basin in Che future. In addition, Che minimum x•33 acre park site is necessary to meet the goals and objectives of the Gen oral Plan in terms of 1.o nation (the General Plan requires a park site in the block boundetl by Etiwanda, East, and Miller Avenuefl and Foothill Barlevard) and intent (The park should be provided at the time of development for the use of ci *_izens in +d / CITY COfNCIL RESOCJTION NO. VTT 74271 - J.S. dOMi CORPORATION March 18, 1992 Page 3 y the inure di ate area), I"Lh of wh tch are consistent with the goals of the General Flan and Etiwanda Specific Plan for providing residential faci lit ies to meet the needs of ail segments of the population for recreation: ze laxaticn and socia l_zati on. i2i The project contemplates the construction of a sound attenuation wall along the edge of the De vore Freeway r ght-of-way, approzi mately 11 to !2 feet high as measured at freeway grade, which is necessary to mitigate the concerns of exposing people to potentially dangerous noise 1sva1<_ ir. portions of the project area. As required by the General P lar., the feasibility of the wall, its height, location, and construction has yet. to be determined since formal approval from Caltrans has not been secured. !3) The project Corte m~lat es tha removal of up to 213 trees on the property, many of which are initially identified as in a healthy and thriving condition as identified by a qualified and licensed azborist. She application as proposed does not include a corcu went ly processed Tree Removal Permit nor any specific tree replacement quantities or species to mitigate the loss of up to 213 trees on the property. This is inconsistent with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (Rancho Cu ra mon ga Municipal Code Chapter 19.08), the goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the absolute policies of the Development Code (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.08.0 SO.E.91, which require replacement of individual trees with species and quantities of a mini imam acceptable level and replacement of existing windrows of 91ue Gum Et~ca lyptus trees to encourage the protection of the windbreak system for reasons of public safety, wind protection, and historical significance. (6) She Tentative 'P ract Map and related plans ref le rt a "grid" local street patte rr„ especially in the area south of Miller Avenue, which is incons s tent with the Residential Design Policies of the Ctty for providing curvilinear streets to promote visually interesting st reets cap es (Rancho Cuca moons Municipal Code Section 17.08.090.0.12 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Section 5.32.100). (5) The Tentative Tract Map and related plans include local cul-de-sac streets that are deal gned with awkward side yard to rear yard relationships. (6) The architecture and related design elements within the proposed project boundaries, as reflected in the app U.cation, is not consistent with the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which states a project shall create or reinforce the "sense of conununity identity, a vc id the feeling of sameness or blandness, and enhance Etiwanda's character." (7) The project does not meet the minimum average lot size as required 6y the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. At the above-referenced public hearing, the City Council denied the associated Desi 4n Revicw of the Vesting Tentative Tra rt Map application. ~'~~a CITY COUNCIL P.EHOLUTION NO. VTT 14211 - U.S. HOME COAPO RATION March 18, 1992 Page 4 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Ccuncil during the above-referenced wblic hearing, including written and oral staff reports, t)1is Counci'_ hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The tentative tract is not consistent with the General Pla r., the Etiwanda Specific Plar., and the Development Code; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract are not consistent with the General Pia n, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, nor the Development Code; and (c) The design of the subdivision is likely to cause substantial environmental damage and injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (d) The evidence presented to this Cov nc it has identified substantial potential adverse environmental effects of the applied for development. 5. Haeed on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, ?, znd 6 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the application. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to U.S. Home Corporation that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the previsions of California Code of Civil Pracedu re Section 1094.fi. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cuca men ga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to th_ adoption o: this Resolution, and (b) for t'nwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, Dy certif i.ed mail, return-receipt requested, to U.S. Home Corporation at the address identified in City records. P. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. d RESOLUTION ND. 9 ~ ~ o "a, A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT°_ COIIN CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C^G~MONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE DESI Gfi REVIEW DF VESTING TENTATSVE TRACT N0. 14211, THE DE SSGN REVIEW OF A RESIDENTIAL SUHDIVISI ON OF 225 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAY IN THE MEDIUM AND LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISm RI CTS (8-14 AND 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER AC As^., RESPE CPIVELY), VJCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENt1E, SOUTH DF THE DEVORE FPJ:EWAY ANU WEST OF EAST AVENGE, AND MAKING FINDINGE IN SUPPORT TN EREOF - APN: 227-237-01, 09, 12, 16, and 32; 227-191- 15; 227-181-24; and 227-261-11. A. Recitals. (x) U.S. Home Corporatior. has filed an app Lication for the approval of the design review of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 1d211 ae described in the trt le of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as the "application." (ii) Or. Ap ri1 24 and September 25, 1991, the Pla fining Co[mti scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings regarding the coop le teness of the subject application. Following the cone luaion of the la It er hearing, the PLann ing Conmissi on adopted Resolution No. 91-142 denying the application without prejudice. (iii) 'The decis ion represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Corm ci 1. (iv) Staff subsequently deemed the project app It ca ti on coop lete on October 30, 1991, prior to the hearing of on the appeal, thereby nullifying the action of the Planning Commission o£ September 25, 1991. (•~) On the 17th day of De ce mbet 1991, and continued to the 17th day of December 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Ran Cho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed publ ir. hear in 9e on the applicati en and, following rnnc lusipn of said public hearings, adopted its Resolution No. 91-193 tleny ing the application. fvi) The decision reV resented by said Planning Commission Resolution wa. ti.me ly appealed to the City Council. ;vii) On the 18th day c£ March 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cu ra moo ga conducted a duly noticed pu 6lic hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. (viii) All 1e 9a1 prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Reeo lur ion have nc cu rre d. d -I CLTY COONCIL RESOLUTION [t0. DR 14211 - O.S. NOME CORPORATION March 19, 1992 Pa qe 2 d. Be solution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and [es olved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," o£ this Resolution. are true and correct. 2. cased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council du Tina the above-referenced Marrh 18, 1992 hearin y, including written staff reports, the nin ores of the above-referenced Piannrnq Commission meetings, and the co nten is of Planning Censni ssi on Resolution No. 97-193, this Cou r,cii hereby soe cif ica lly finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property generally located east of Etiwanda Ave n'ae, south of the Devore Freeway and west of East Avenue with an Etiwan da Avenue frontage of 712 feet, a Devore Freeway frontage of 349 feet and an Enst Avenue frontage of 414 feet on property zoned Low Medium Residential and i.s presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subj set site is single family residential and vac dnt and zoned Low Medium and Medium Residential (4-8 and 9-14 dwelling units per acre, respectively); the property to the south of that site is single family resi dent es and vacant and is zoned Low Medium Residential; the property to the east consists of single family residences and vacant land and is zoned Low Medium Residential and City of Fontana; and the property to the went is sin qle family residential and vacant and rs zoned Low Medium Ae si denti al; and fc) The applicatron contemplates the 3e ve lopment of 226 single `.ami ly residences with an avers qe lot size of 9,685 square feet, and an interim deters tior, basin of 10.6 acres for the purpose of receiving drainage Eor this project as well as future projects in the iimnedia to area; and (d1 The project ae proposed will require approval of related Etiwan da Specific Plan Amendment 89-03, which woo id allow lots of a minimum average lot size of 9,685 square feet or less (as amended) in the Low Fled ium Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (e) The application as proposed would be materially detrimental to the persons and properties in the in¢ne diate vicinity of the proposed site f. or the reasons as follows: (1) The Tentative Tract Map as proposed does not indicate a let teretl parcel of 2.33 acres or greater Eor the purpose of a park, which is the min irtn:m requirement of the Quimby Ace (a minimum of 3 acres of park paz 1,000 re si den tsl and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Cha pT.er 16.32, nor does the Tentative Tract Map reflect a site plan design that would allow this park to be expanded on the Conti genus property uti Lized as an interim detention ~ ~3 CITY rCUNCIL AE SOLUTION NO. DR 14211 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION March 18, 1992 Page 3 r basin in the future. In addition, the minimun 2.33 acre park site is necessary to meet the eoa is and objectives of the General Pian in terms of location (the General Plan requires a park site in the block bounded by Etiwanda, East, ar,d Miller Avenues and Foothill Eou levard) and intent (the park should be provided at the time of development for the use of citizens ir. the i;mnediate area), both o.' which are consistent with the goals of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan for providing residential facilities to meet the needs of all segments of the population for recreation, relaxation and socialization. (2) The project contemplates the construction of a sound a ctanuation wall along the edge of the De yore freeway ri qht-cf-way, approximately 11 to 12 feet high as measured at freeway grade, which is necessary to mitigate the concerns of exposing oeop ie to ootent Tally dangerous noise levels in portions of the project area. As required by the General P tan, the feasibility of the wall, its height, location, and constxu ction has yet is be determined since formal approval from Caltrans has not been secured. (3) The project contemplates the removal of up to 213 trees on the property, many of which are initially identified as in a healthy and thriving condition as identified by a qualified and licensed arborist. The aop li cation as proposed does not include a concurrently processed Tree Removal Permit nor any specific tree replacement quantities or Species to mitigate [he loss of up to 213 trees on the property. This is inconsistent with the Cicy's Tree Preservation ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 19.08), the goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the absolute policies of the Development Code (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.OB.CS O.E.R ), whicF. require replacement of individual trees with species and quantities of a minimum acceptable level and replacement of existing windrows of Blue Gum Euca lyptua trees to encourage the orote ct ion of the windbreak system for reasons cf public safety, wind protection, and historical. sx golf Trance, (4) The Tentative Tract Map and related plans reflect e "gu d" local street ye"_e rn, especially in the area south of Miller Avenue, which is into neisten~ with the Pes ide ntial Design Policies of the City for providing curvilinear etreete to promote visually interesting streets cap es (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.C8.090.C.12 and Etiwanda Specific Pisa Section 5.32.100). (5) The Tentative Tract Map and related plans include Local cal-de-sac strr_e is that are designed with awkward side yard to rear yard relationships. (6) 'Cho architecture and related design elements within the proposed project bnundari es, as reflected in the app Yi cati on, 1s not consistent with the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which states a project shall create or reinforre the "sense of <omm~inity identity, avoid the Ees ling of sameness or blandness, and enhance Etiwanda 's character." ~ ~~~ CITY COUNCIL REBOLVT ION NO. DR 14211 - ^.E. HOME CORPORATION March i8, 1992 Page 4 (?1 The project does net meet the minimum average lot size as required by the Etiw anda Soecific Pian. 3. At the above-referenced public hearing, the •^. i.ty Council denied the associated Vesting 'Pentative Tract Map application. 4. Baaed upon the substantial evi de nc_ presented to this Council du r.nq the above-referenced public heatih g, in cludi.ng written and oral staff reports. this Councii F._reby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is not consisvent with the General Plan, the Et iwanda Spec if ir. P1xn, and the Development Code; and (b) That the proposed de si 4n is not in accord with the ob je ct fives o£ the Et iw anda Specific Plan, nor the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is not in compliance with each of the app li. cab le provisions of the Etiwanda Spec ifrc Plan and Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the cor.ditiors applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare and materially injurious to properties or Smprovements in the vicinity. 5. Rased on the finding:: and con clusiona set for. th in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the application. 6. This Ccunc it hereby provides notice to U.S. Home Corporation that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the proviaiona of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 109d.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to Lhe adoption of this Resolution, and (b) f orthw irh transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mailr return-receipt requested, to U.S. Home Corporation at the address identified in City records. e. The Clty Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. I _~. - - C[TT OF' RAYCHO Cl'CAbIUtiGA ~~.. STAFF REPORT ,z~ ~' ,, DATE: March 18, 1992 ~: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Ciry Manage FROM: Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk ~~ N'~ SUBJECT: LARK DRIVE RIGHT-OF1WAY ACQUISITION At the Council meeting of Match 4, 1992, Council continued the Eminent Domain action to acquire the rightrof-way for Lark Drive tiom Rochester Avenue, west. to it's present terminus. Due m the staff report being very detailed and lengthy, staff will not have it available far distribution until Monday, March 16, 1992. This staff report will then be incorpaa[ed as pert of the agenda package. /m ----- ---- - -- C1T1' QF RASC'HO C['('Ay1Cl5GA STAFF REPORT ~~,~ -f DATE: March 18, 1992 i TD: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~, DY: Mike Olivier, Sr. Ci vTl Engineer SUBJECT: EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLiC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR i LARK DR IYE FROM ITS EXIST IHG EASTERLY TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER '~ AYENUE RECO!lEMDATION Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of Right-of-Way for both the construction of street improvements far the Lark Drive from its existing easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue Assessors Parcel Number 227-011-13 (a vacant lot) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUIm/ANALYSIS This action the precondition to an Eminent Domain action to acquire Right-of-Way for Lark Drive. The limits are from the existing easterly terminus of Lark Drive to Rochester Avenue. This street is needed prior to the opening of the new high school on the south side of Lark Drive. It will serve both the school and residential development. The street tmpr•ovement plans Include, but are not limited to street, signal, utilities and storm drains; all of which are typical street Improvement elements. Lark Crive is further required per staff review of Tract No, 13279 with conditions requiring such street future construction and precise alignment approval. The necessity for the construction of Lark Drive was initially established by the approval of the Victoria Community Plan under City Ordinance 143 dated May 20, 1981. AL that time it was labeled an unprecise street with precise alignment to be designated upon submittal of future tentative tract maps. A traffic study, completed by a developer and approved by the City Engineer August 26, 1985, confirmed the need far a single east entry road at the location now shown and known as Lark Drive. The alignment of which was more specifically established through the approval of tract map No. 13219 approved by Council in Resolution 87-40 on March 3, 1981. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AC"JIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FGR LARK DRIVE TO ROCHESTER AVENUE MARCH 18, 1992 PAGE 2 • The final alignment was chosen with the centerline of the road being app roxi ma teiy the southerly property line of the parcels being considered for the Eminent Domain action. This would require the least amount of land from the properties in question, to safely and completely construct Lark Drive. If the proposed alignment is moved south it would interfere with the school site currently under construction. If Tt is moved north it would separate each of the remainder parcels into two pieces. The proposed street is designed to standard City specifications. Within 120 days of final approval of Tract Map 13279 an agreement was entered into by and between the City, the William Lyon Company and the Chaffey Joint High School OTstrict Tn accordance with Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act. The Subdivision Map Act more specifically states that if Lhe City cannot construct or cause to be constructed the required road within 120 days of the approval of the tract map, said tract being 13279, it may require the subdivider to enter iota an agreement to complete necessary improvements when the City acquires an interest in the land. Said agreement being the recorded three party agreement approved by City Council December 3, 1987, and recorded January 27, 1988, as San Bernardino County document No. 88-025597. Separate and distinct from the Subdivision Map Act requirements are the provisions of California Government Code 40404(a) which provides that a City may acquire land necessary for streets and street improvements. The parcels in question were annexed into the Victoria Community by Council adoption of Crdi na nce 362, July 20, 1988. The Victoria Community Plan approved May 20, 1981 as City Ordinance 143, the Traffic Study approved August 26, 1985 and approval of Tract 13279 determine Lhe public need to construct Lark Drive. At this time this project is necessary to protect and preserve health, safety, welfare and property as described in the Code of Civil Procedure item 1245.230. Further, it has been determined that the proposed alignment being the southerly property line of the parcel in question (a common practice) will provide for the greatest public good and the least private Injury because the alignment leaves the remainder parcel in the condition most conducive to subsequent development. The proposed Alignment of lark Drive has been reviewed under CEQA as summarized Tn a memorandum from Dan Coleman, Principal Planner to John Martin, Associate Engineer, dated February 4, 1992, a copy of which is atirched hereto. The Environmental documentation as is, is sufficient and will require no amendment, supplementation, or subsequent analysts as determined by the Planning Department staff. ~~i ~!' ?J CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-NAY FOR LARK DRIYE TO ROCHESTER AVENUE MARCH lA, 1992 PAGE 3 V The property owner of the parcel in question, APN 227-011-13 has been contacted personally by staff and sent a written offer based on the independent appraiser valuation. To date the owners have not responded to the latest offer. Although open negotiations remain available, it is felt necessary, due to time constraints to have the street constructed prfor to school opening in September, Lo enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such Right-of-way for the construction of Lark Drive. There are no structures within the area of take, therefore, it is requested that City Attorney request a 3 day order of possession to insure construction of the street, signal, utilities and storm drains in a timely manner. Respectfully syblllTt~ed, ~~~, d~~ Ni117am J. 0'1 City Engineer WJO:M0:1y Attachments ~ti~ ~~/'~ i HIO HLAND AVENUE !ROUTE 30) _;- ~~_ W ZI W ); Q wl Y JI ~ III O ~~ ti APN 227-011-13 PARF 1 ~- PARi ~ I APN 227-071-09 1tB 81 HIG H~A4D AvE I I FLOOD CONTROL BASIN I PAF7 2 w z i LARK DRIVE 0 HIGH SCHOOL a ~ SITE w r W ' N V O NOT TO SC.US VICTORIA PARK LANE I BAS£ LINE ROAD CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION •,~~y~~ ~ VICINITY MAP DATE: February 4, 1492 c1TY of RANCxo cucAMONC:~ MEMORANDUM TO John Martin, Associate Engineer IltOiVf: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner~~/ SliB1ECf: LARKDRNE Pcr your request, I have researched the history of Lark Drive and determined that the street alignrr:ent was reviewed under CEQA as summarized below: May 20, 1981 City Council adopts Ordinance ]43 approving Victoria Community Plan which also certified the EIR as adequate. The Plan indicated two east-west street connections from the Vineyards North Village to Rochester Avenue, above Victoria Park Lane. A condition of approval required "precise alignment smdies...of any unprecise street" to be prepared with any tentative tract maps (Circulation Condition 6, Resolution 81-37). August 26, 1985 Traffic study prepared by developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The study clearly showed a single east-west street connection to Rochester where the proposed Lark Drive is located. December 10, 1986 A conceptual "Area Development Plan," which included specific road alignments, was approved by Planning Commission Resolution 86190. The "ou[parcels" ti.e., 80 acres of land located at the southwest comer of Highland and Rochester), as well as the street wnnections [o same, were soecifically reviewed and discussed by the Planning Commission. March 25, 1987 Tentative Tract 13279, a "super block" master tentative map for the Victoria Vineyards Non}t Village is approved by Planning Commission Resolution 87-40. The staff report discusses the issue of Lark Drive (i.e., "Eas[ Entry Road") in detail. A Negative G;;clarauon was approved by the Planning Commission and a Notice of Determination filed. July 20, 1988 City Council adopts Ordinance 362 approving Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88-02 which annexs the 80 acre "outpamels" into Victoria. A Negative Declaration was approved by the Planning Commission and a Notice of Determination filed. March 1, ]989 City Council adopts Ordinance 393 approving Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88-OS which modifies the circulatior. and land use exhibits to show asingleeast-west street connxtion to Rochester consistent with TI' 13279. A Negative Declaration was approved and a Notice of Determination filed. Copies of pertinent staff reports, resolutions, exhibits, etc. are attached. x ~~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~-Z ~ ~ ~J J A RESOLUTION OF THE CI TV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPFORT THEREOF A- Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga by mutual 3 party agreement with The William Lyon Company (TWLC) and Chaffey High School Ois Lri ct was pursuing the acquisition of Right-of-Way for Lark Drive, the Location commonly known by APN 227-011-13 (a vacant lot). TWLC attempted to negotiate with owners to purchase the necessary rights-of-May but was unable to acquire same. (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7261-2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire *.he property for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuation; (iv) On March 4, 1992, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of C1vi1 Procedures, Section 1245-235, and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; (v) This project has been environmentally reviewed through the Circulation element of the Victoria Planned Community and approved by City Ordinance No. 143. No charges to the project area have occurred, and ft is found no additional Environmental Review is necessary; and B. Resolution NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A-1 thru A-6, oft s eso u ion. SECTION 2: That portion of the property which is required for a Right-of-Way for s ree mprovement purposes referenced herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Ex hi6lt "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during e a ove-referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: _~ ~~ G~ RESOLUTION - LARK DRIVE MARCH 4, 1992 PAGE 2 a. The public interest and necessity required the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267-2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the proper~3escribed in Section 2, above, by proceedings in Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, Tn the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against alt owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final detenni na ti on in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property far the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of avor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1992 and was finally passed at a regular mee ng o he City ounc o e 'cy of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1992, by the following vote; AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: e ra ems, y er City of Rancho Cucamonga -~ y(~ ~-~ EXHIBIT A-I n[wngnd n[opsnm n City of Rancho Curamonp MN[N nECOnO[p Y4l i0 City of R(n<ho Cucunonp + P.G. Box BW Ranrhp Cucamonte, CA 917]0 tPAC[ A[OVt iNl( LIN(lpn nFCOnpG'( WE EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSI~ERATIVN, raripl of whirh u hereby arkno»Ird[gl, JA:1ET CA5'E BAUER, Trustee of the Chulee N. Dauer Trua[ under CeQnrat3pn o[ Trust dated Cecembe[ 1), :90Ar and I'JJICEIiA SABER, trust ee c[ [ha. Marcella Bauer trust under Oecle ra LLOn o[ is ust dated nay IB, 190) GRANT(S) to the Cily of Rancho Cucunonga, • Municipal Corpoulion, an EASEMENT for 5¢ecq hlghvay mJ related purposes. N, ova and upon Ihel retrain real prpp<rty io the City of Rancho Cucunpn(a, County e(Ban Bernudino, Slsm a[ CaB(orlda, Desnh<A u Follows: SEE ATiACHEt) E[Nl Blig Owed _____ _ GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT Slaty al Caunly pl 1B__, Oelpra me, Ina Un0<rYBn<d NpNq' Publiq pagonallY appeared 11 pereonalir Ynonn la me ewred to ne on lne 4asm of rallelaclory mldenca Iota lnn pafon0l wnaae namNSl _auOfcrlGed to lnr »Ilnln ln]Irymanl and aCanowladpad lM1al _naeuled ll WITNESS mr Inm.nd pwrla sea Neiny>S~pnalure -.- on mla mt_ mYpl ~u -_-__ THIS IC A f. C.NLRAL ACRkCNL[nGp.NLNT. PLGSL 115E PPCPEp ACPNONL[BG[N[Ni, t.E. pAPTNLRLNiP, COPPOPATCr [TC. EXHI BI; A-2 41e1 De mrlprlon Fnf screec lil8hrey ud deleted Pvrposea Lark nDrlve Dedicated to Tne city of Rancho cucevonge Those portions of the Neste fly 3// of toe Narthvest 1/1 0[ the Northeast 1/1, 3lCtlon ]1, T1N, R6N, Sen earns ralno Bese Ne rldie n, 1n the county o[ Sen Bernetdlno, State of Cu llfornle, according to the UnAted States Ooverneent Tomshlp plot approved by the Surveyor Cenerel dated Novesber 13, 1885, es ehom on the Reco[d o[ Survey recorded in Book /7, Pega 72, records in the of Llce o[ the County Recorder, o[ the County of Sen Bernardino, deectlbed ea [sllovs: Parcel 3 The Southerly 51.oa feet thereof. Pereel 1 NNCI NNIND e[ the Northees[ corner o[ the above deacrl bed Pereel 1; TNIBiCN Nee[erly along Lhe Northerly line o[ Geld Pepcel 1 e d16ta PCe O[ 110.9fi (eat t0 • Point on A tarlQept curve concave Northerly having a tedlue o[ 1"/0.00 feet( TNmICB Seeterly elo:q geld curve Nrough a central angle o[ 09 degrees 01 dnutetl s7 seconds en arc dietence o[ 50.56 feet to a paint one reve[ee tangent cu rva concave Southerly having a redlue o[ 110.00 feet, a radial to Bard reveres tangent curve thraugn eeid point beers S OB degrees 50 elnatea ]1 secende 3; TSmICN easterly along veld curve through a con trel angle o9 degrees 01 of notes 07 eecanda en arc distance of 68.06 feet toe point On a to ngen! line dram parallel to and 10.00 feet NorNerly eeasured et right englee o[ said Northerly line e[ eeid Parcel li TltmfCN P.eaterly along sold line a die[ance of 1.87 Leet to a point on the easterly line o[ sold Ne6t 1/~, Northveeb 1J1, NatNeest 1//, Section 11, TIN, RON; TiD.O:Ce Southerly el onq geld peste[ly line a dlste nee o[ 10.00 [eat to the POINT of BSSIIrIrINO. Approvleeb Atae Petcal 1: 17,311.7 equate [lot, 0.10 Berea Pe[pl 1: 195.0 equate [aekr o.B1 acres Ex!~iair a-3 sa _ ~ a ~~ W: L hi '~ I l,- _ L~ i l~l ~'~ in ltl Y - z , R ~ /_- _ si i. ~~ 3 -- ~ :s av a~ a 0 Q J >z za a f- fa o~ U U U N aw 00 FJ a~ a" fJ W J W V . ~ °pn .~Oe a '^°° °' F- ads ads 00 O E%HIBIT A-4 (.egel Daecri ption yor Street Nlghvey entl Related Purpoeae on Le rk Drl ve Dedlceted io The Clty aC Retwho Nce>ronge That portlen of the 6neterly 1/2 of the Masterly 1/2 of the NorUNest 1/4 of the Nor Uenst 1/t o[ Section ]1, T]N, R6N, Sen Berne rdlno Beee and Marld le n, 1n the County o! Snn Berne[dlno, State of California, accord Sng to the Unlletl S tatea Gaverneent Tovnahlp plat approved by the Surveyor Gene[al dated Noveeber ll. tBe5~ ea shown on the Recortl of Survey recordai in Book ty, Pege 71, recoztla Sn tAe office of the County Becortlar of the County of Sen eernertlino, deacribea ee follove: TTe Southerly 63.00 feet thereof. Approrlrete ezeet ]o,5Je.] equere fast 0. ~] ectee E%fiIBIT A-5 y':' l s wv w°' r\ w; i~ a 1 V ~~1 Lei 111 l~l '' ~~~ i ~~~ ti ~~~ ~~l e 4 3 1 t ilJ Y 4 J s v i We Z 2 a~ ar fa o~ ~u U aw o° r J as aw f J ------- -----~- CIT]' OF RAKC'FI(1 C'i'C':1~tUtiGa 5TAFI~' REPORT ~,.~ ~' GATE: March 18, :992 i T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer '~, BY: Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer ~~ SUBJECT: EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-MAY FOR LARK DRIVE FROM ITS EXISTING --eASTERLY TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE AND THF. SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE RECO!lEMDATION Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemmation of Right-of-Nay for both the construction of street improvements for the Lark Drive from its existing easterly terminus tc Rochester Avenue and also for the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue at the property located at 18811 Highland Avenue (APN 227-011-09) Tn the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This action is the precondition to an Eminent Domain action to acquire Right-of-Way for Lark Drive. The limits are from the existing easterly terminus of Lark Drive to Rochester Avenue. This street is needed prior to the opening of the new high school on the south side of Lark Drive. it will serve both the school and residential development. The street improvement plans include, but are not limited to, curb, gutter, storm drains; all are typical street Improvement elements. p separate portion of the sub,~ect property is sought to be acquired for the Installation of a signal and full Intersection widening for Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue. The signal and widening are necessary to ensure safe traffic circulation as identified in the Traffic Study dated August 26, 1985 and per staff review of Tract No. 13279 with conditions requiring such street future construction and precise alignment approval. The necessity for the construction of Lark Drive was initially established by the approval of the Victoria Community Plan under City Ordinance 143 dated May 20, 1981. At that time it was labeled an unprecise street with precise alignment to be designated upon submittal of future tentative tract maps. ~` ~~'~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ACQUIRE PUDLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LARK GRIVE TO ROCHESTER AVENUE/HIGHLAND @ ROCHESTER MARCH 18, 1992 PAGE 2 y A traffic study, completed by a developer and approved by the City Engineer August 26, 1985, confirmed the need for a single east entry road at the location now shown and known as Lark Orive. The alignment of which was more specifically established through the approval of tract map No. 13279 approved by Council in Resolution 87-40 on March 3, 1987. The final alignment was chosen with the centerline of the road being approximately, the southe rty property line of the parcels being considered for the Eminent Domain action- This would require the least amount of land from the properties in question, to safely and completely construct Lark Drive. If the proposed alignment is moved south it would interfere with the School site currently under construction. If it Ts moved north it would separate each of the remainder parcels into two parcels. The proposed street is des7gned to standard City specifications. Within 120 days of final approval of Tract Map 13279 an agreement was entered into by and between the City, the William Lyon Company and the Chaffey Joint High School District in accordance with Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act. The Subdivision Map Act more specifically states that if the City cannot construct or cause to be constructed the required road within 120 days of the approval of the tract map, said tract being 13279, it may require the sub di vt der to enter into an agreement to complete necessary improvements when the City acquires an interest in the land. Said agreement being the recordeG three party agreement approved by City Council December 3, 1987, and recorded January 27, 1988, as San Bernardino County document No- 88-025597. Separate and distinct from the subdivision Map Act requirements are the provisions of California Government Code 4040A(a) which provides that a City may acquire land necessary for streets and street improvements. The parcels in questlen were annexed into the Victoria Community by Council adoption of Ordinance 352, July 20, 1988. The Victoria Commmlty Plan approved May 20, 1981 as City Ordinance 143, the Traffic Study approved August 26, 1965 and approval of Tract 13279 determine the public need to construct Lark Drive. At this time this pro,j ect 1s necessary to protect and preserve health, safety, welfare and property as desc rT bed in the Code of CTV 71 Procedure item 1245.230. Further, it has been determined that the proposed alignment being the southerly property line of the parcel in question (a common practice) will provide for the greatest public good and the least private injury because the alignment leaves the remainder parcel in the condition most condusive to subsequent development. i ~ y ~-~ n/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LARK DRIVE TO ROCHESTER AVENUE/HIGHLAND @ ROCHESTER MARCH 18, 1992 PAGE 3 The proposed Alignment of Lark Drive has been reviewed under CEQA as summarized in a memorandum from Dan Coleman, Principal Planner to John Martin, Associate Engineer, dated February 4, 1992, a copy of which is attached hereto. The Environmental documentation as is, is sufficient and will requi ra no amendment, supplements ti or, or subsequent analysis as determined 6y the Planning Department staff. EIR review for the parcel at the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue was approved by Council on November ?, 1491- The Planning Department has determined that no further analysis is required at this location. It has been determined that with the inclusion of school related traffic and es tlma ted volumes of other traffic in the area a traffic signal will provide the necessary levei of traffic control for the Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue intersection. Traffic volume studies from the City traffic model completed January 18, 1990, and a Traffic Signal Warrant submitted to Caltrans June 21, 1991, support same. Installation of the traffic signal at its ultimate location will preclude the need to modify the signal at such time as Rochester Avenue is fully improved. It is al se the City's Engineering policy to install traffic signals at their ultimate location whenever possible. The property owner of the Parcel in question, APN 227-011-09, was sent an offer, based on the results of an independent appraisal, in a letter dated December 20, 1992. Since that time the owner has been contacted personally by staff to discuss the project. Staff and the contract appraiser met personally in City offices with the owner, to discuss valuations. As of Lhis date negotiations have resulted in an impasse. The owner was offered the opportunity to present viable information to the Appraiser for possible reevaluations. Upon meeting, the owner presented the appraiser with a 2 year old offer on the property and personal opinions on valuation of the land. The information presented was inconclusive and unsubstantiated, therefore the appraisal remained unchanged. Staff has continued to assist Mr. Devito Francesca with any and all of his requests, providing him public Information and documentation at his request. Although open negotiations remain available, it is felt necessary, due to time constraints and public safety to have the street constructed the intersection of Rochester and Highland improved and the signal functioning prior to school opening in September, Lo enact a Resolution of Necessity to p.^oceeA with condemnation of such Right-of- way for the construction of Lark Orive. •-~ `/ G~ ~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-NAY FOR LARK DRIVE TO ROCHESTER RVENUE/HIGHLAND @ ROCHESTER MARCH 18, 1992 PAGE 4 There are no structures within the area of take, therefore, it is requested that City Attorney request a 3 day order of possession to insure construction of the street, signal, utilities and storm drains in a timely manner. Respectfully submitted, ,~ ~~~±~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer ~ WJ O:MO:Iy Attachments ~~ I W =I ai al _~ w Y. j ~ ~~ HIGHLAND AVENUE (ROUTE 30) APN 227-011-13 PART 7 ~ i 4PN 227-011-09 ~ itBBt HIG4LAND AVe i I FLOOD CONTROL -ASLV PARL 1 LARK DRIVE 0 HIGH SCH007, SITd PART 2 'I w z W 6 w W' N x U NoT To SCAIS K VICTORIA PARK LANE j RASE LINE ROAD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E:v'GINEERING DIVISION •.~' yG- /ti VJCINITY MAP DATE: Febn:ary 4, 1992 CITY' OF RANCHO CL~CA\IONGA MEMORANDUM TO John Martin, Associate Engineer~~,,^^ FROM: Dan Coleman, Prindpal Planrer`!~' SliBJECT: LARK DRIVE / ~\, Per yow request, I have researched the history of Lark Dtve and determined that 6te street alignment was reviewed under CEQA as summarized below: May 20, ]981 City Council adopts Ordinance 143 approving Victoria Community Plan which also certified the EIR as adequate. She Plan indicated two east-west street connections from the Vineyards North Village to Rochester Avenue, above Victoria Park lane. A condition of approval required "precise alignment studies...of any unprecise street" to be prepared with any tentative [tact maps (Circulation Condition 6, Resolution 81-37). August 26, 1985 Traffic study prepared by developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The study clearly showed a single east-west street connection to Rochester where the proposed [.ark Drive is located. December 10, 1986 A conceptual "Area Development Plan," which included specific road alignments, was approved by Planning Commission Resolution 86-190. The "outparcels" (i.e., 80 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Highland and Rochester), as well as the street connections to same, were specitieaily reviewed and discussed by the Planning Commission. ':March 25, 1987 Tentative Tract 13279, a "super block" master tentative map fox the Victoria Vineyards Nonh Village is approved by Planning Commission Resolution 87-40. The staff report discusses the issue of Lark Drive (i.e., "East Entry Road") in detail. A Negative Declaration was approved by the Planning Commission and a Notice of Detemunation filed. July 20, 1988 City Council adopt Ordinance 362 approving Vic[oda Community Plan Amendment 88-02 which annexs the 80 acre "outparcels" into Victoria. A Negative Declaration was approved by the Planning Commission and a Notice of Determination filed. March 1, 1989 City Council adopts Ordinance 393 approving Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88-OS which modifies the circulation and land use exhibi!s ~o show a single east-west street connection to Rochester consistent with TT 13279. A Negative Declaration was approved and a Notice of Determination filed. Copies of pertinent staff reports, resolutions, exhibits, etc. are attached. J ~~( /\~ ~^'= RESOLUTION NO. ~I-z ~ ~ ~y A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE C11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERiOF A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga by a mutual 3 party agreement with The William Lyon Company (TWLC) and Chaffey High School District was pursuing the acquisition of Right-of-Nay far Lark Drive at APN 221-011-09 commonly known by the Street address 18811 Highland Avenue. TWLC attempted to negotiate with owners to purchase the necessary rights-of-Way but was unable to acquire same, further the City by the same agreement attempted to obtain street Right-of-way for widening the intersection of Highland and Rochester Avenues for a signal but could not reach a negotiated settlement. (ii) Pursuant to the provi dons of California Government Code Section 40404 (a), a City may acquire private properties by condemnation when it is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Governnent Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the properties for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuation; (iv) Dn March 4, 1932, Lhis Council held a duly noticed hearing oursuant to the terms of Calif, rnia Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1245.235, and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; (v) This project has been environmentally reviewed through the Circulation e'. ement of the Victoria Planned Community and approved by City Ordinance No. 143 and City Resolution 91-321. No changes to the project area have occurred, and iL is found no additional Environment Review is necessary; and B. Resolution NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A-1 thru A-6, oft s eso u ion. SECTIOR 2: That portion of the properties which are required fnr a Right-o~- ay -t pr street improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal aescriptions and maps attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. RESOLUTION - LARK DRIVE MARCH 4, 1992 PAGE 2 SECTIOk 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during tea ove-referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity required the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c- The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the proper es escri bed in Section 2, above, 6y proceedings in Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the properties described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitt!ng the C1 ty to take possession and use of said real properties for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ayor 1, OEBRq J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1992 and was finally passed at a regular mee~ng of-}he City ounc ~ o e ., ty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1992, by the following vote; AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: e ra ams, y er City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~ -T- / ~GHLAND 9 0.0C'A TIER "'~ E %NIBIi 'A'- JNI newnwxv Mwrrrm n , Cny vl Rancho CLCamon{a wxEx nrwnvcv uuLTV EXH IA IT A-1 City o; Rancho Cu<u.an{a ~ P.O. Don B01 Rucho Cucamonp, U 91 T)D vgca uarnxu uxvvn Eewnvu'a uu __ EASEMENT ADN 227-011-D9 FOR A VALUADLE COh'SIOERATION, rEaipt of which u haAhy atnoNlcd{cd, N{CK OEVIiO. INC.. A CAL 60RalA [DADDA Ai IFN GAANT(51 to Ne Ciiy a( R;~xihoEiS,uM1uH'ibYSxANO c~E~AiEO DURDOf ES ~~ENT for in, over end upon men ttnvn eeel yopenY in Ne City of Rancho Coumonp, County of San Berrwdlno, 61a1e of Glilornia, t><ssncLa u Fallowa: THOSE POgi10115 OF THE EASTC.gLT 1/2 Of THE NORi11NF ST 1/0 DF THE NORTHEAST 1/q OF SELi ION J1, i1H, R64, SAN BE0.NAA01 N0 B0.5E ANO HEA IDIAN IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNgg0I N0, STATE OF CAL 60ANIA, AC[ON01 NG 10 THE VNI1f0 STATES GOYERNMEN7 TONNSIIIP FLAT APDAOVED BY iNE SURYEyOA GENCAAL, DATED NOYEMOEA 17, 1885, AS SNONN ON YHE AECDAO OF SUq VEY gECOROED IN BOOK aT, pAGE )2, PECOADS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNEY 0.ELOROERa OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOa OESCR IBED AS FOLLOYS: Ok GI NNING Ai THE INiERSEC iION YIiN illE YE Si LINE OF AOPIESiTR 11VENIIF., A 60-F(qi NIOE 5i8EET AND THE SOU IN LINE OF NIGIILP.NO AYENIIE, A 66-1007 HIOC $IREEi, iI1ENtE NOR1N B3 36'09" HEST ALONC THE SOUTHEAIY LINE Of HIGHLAND AYENVE 10.89 FEET, THENCE SOUENERLY IJ.00 FEET ALONG ALINE DERDENOICULAR KITH AND MEASURED A7 AIGN1 ANGLES 4IiN THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NIGNUNO AVENUE 10 iRE BEGINNING OF A CU0.YE CONCAVE i0 iP.E SOVi11NE5i HAYfNG A RgpIVS Of 21.00 FEET, SEID BEGINNING OF CUAYE 15 TANGENT TO A LINE OAANN DAAALLEL NI7N ANO 1).00 FEET SDDiH HEASMEO AT RIGHT ANGLES Oi iNE SDUiH LINE OF Hl GIIIANO AYC HUE, 1HENCE SOUTNEASIERLY 32.91 FEET ALONG SAID LURYE i0 R A 40IAL i. LNE OF SA 10 CURVE, 5A!0 R4DIAL UNE 15 PERPEI101 CULAR 4I iN ANO NEASUREO AT AIGHi ANGLES 4IiN THE YE STERLY LIRE OF ROCNE SIFR AVENUE, THENCE 20.00 FEF~ ALONG SAID RAD 14L LINE TO iNE VESIT0.LY LINE OF g0[HESRR AVENUE, THENCE HGA TH 0 II'2B" EAS7 73.85 FEET PLONG SAID NESiERIi LINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE TO THE ROINi OF OEGINNIM1'G. CCY iAINI4G IOd;.74 SgOAgE FEE! NOAE CR LESS. A7iACHEO HERETO PNO NADE A DPAT OF THE LEGAL OE6LR IDiION IS A DLA1 VeLEO 'EXH IBIi B'. Oolcd . OENERAI ACKNO WIEDOMENT SLN of . Coumr el OnInbIM =arY O1 ss . IY_, Mlwa ma, Ine u~anr'aNaa Noun pueec, po.oNalr epvu,aa p M'p.on nlu me omn Tn maon irehnn or yrMNUO~y v~amw ,n MIM4monlal ~^~me~amelEl Ju0acn0"a ~o in. «mi„ma'am."~, a,a ac+~o.uavea ~M~ aafulaa n. wI1NE55 my nano ana omaal ual. floivy ~ S~pnaTwe THIS IS n f.LMERA4 ACANnNLEfIGCKLMT. PLEASE USE pPnpEP nLRNOXLI.CL[xLMT. L.E. pARTNEpSNI P, CON PGPAT[, EiC. Hivv r l~ AREA = 1049 34', ~ wlo iN = Z m UI O LC =32.91' I M ~ P I ti, 20' PROPOSED RiW I . wla I N II ~ f ~ DFtJOTES AREA CF EASEMENT = N.T.S. 1043 34 SOUARE FEETt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I RIGHT-OF-V'/AY MAP -EXHIBIT "B" _ ~~I!GNLnND AVENUE _ N 89= 36' G9" Vi EX!1191T A-2 CURVE DATA: L = 89°4 T37" R = 21.00' LC = 32 91' I 40 89' _~~ RO a. z ~- w >. a ro ~ N W ~ VESTEE: NICK DEVITO, INC. omr_o.z?91 APN 227-011-09 ,.....:.._ EXHIOITS A-3 THOSE PORTIO!JS OF TIIE EASTERLY 1/2 OF TIIE IlORTIINESi 1/4 OF TIIE IiORTIIEAST 1/4 OF SECTIDN 31, T1N, RGW, SAN UERNARUINO OASE ANU MER IUTAII IN Tllf. COUIIfY OF SAN UEIUTARUINO, SiAIE U'r CAL IFUIiNIA, ACCOIIUING 1U TIIE VIII IEU STATES GU YERNMi II( TUIlgSIIIP PLAT APPRO'JEU DY TIIE SURVEYOR GENERAL, DATED NOYEMUER 13, 18D5, AS SIIUWIJ ON TIIE RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED III GOOK 4T, PAGE 72, RECORDS IN TIIE OFFICE OF TIIE COUNTY RECUIiOER, OF TIIE CUUlITY OF SAN DERNN3UIN0, UESCRIDEU AS FOLLOWS: UEGINNING AT TIIE INTERSECTION NlTII TIIE NEST UNE OF ROClIESTER AVENUE, A 6U-FOOT WIDE STREET AND TIIE SOUTIi LIRE OF HIGIILAND AVENUE, A 65-FOOT NIUF. STREET, TIIENCE NURTII 89 36'09" WEST ALONG TIIE SOU (IIERLY LINE OF l11 GIiLANU AYE IIUE 40.U9 FEET, TIIENCE SOUTHERLY 13.OC FEET ALONG A LINE PERPENDICULAR WITH ANU FIEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES WITH THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE TO THE BEG[IINING OF n CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTIIIJEST fIAYI?!G A RADIUS OF 2I .00 FEET, SA10 DEGRIIIING OF CURVE IS TANGENT 70 n LINE UIIAWN PAItALLEL HITH nllU 13.00 FEET SOU111 MEASURED nT Rlfll! ANGLES OF 111E ~OUTN LIilE OF HIGIILAND AVENUE, TIIEIICE~ SOUTHEASTERLY 32.91 FEET ALOIIG SAID CURVE TU n tADIAL LRJE OF SAID CURVE, SAID RADIAL LIME IS DERPEIIDICULAR WITH ANU FIEASURED AT i1GiIT ANGLES WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF.ROGIESTER AVENUE, THENCE 2O.UU FEEb nL01R) SAID RADIAL LfNE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, TIIENCE IIURTII U il'20" ~nsr 33.85 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LIIIE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE TO TIIE POllli OF ;EGINIIIFIG. ONTAINING 1043.34 SQUARE FEET FIORE OR LESS. ATTACHED HERETO AIIU MnUE A PART OF TIIE FG~.L DESCRIPTION IS A PLAT LADLED "EXHI8IT 8". i E%H161T A.~ A[rnpwpY n[auearzo ar City of Rancho Cura[nonp MNIN nFCOnpfp YNL TQ City of Rancho CLcvnonP ' P.O. BaA g01 Rancho CucamonP, CA 9810 Vnc[ llov[ 1NI! LIN! pOn nECORO[n'! V[! EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, [tteipl of which u hcrcby acknow:ed{ed, NiCR UEV ISV, SNC., a Cpli(orn ie Corpnrerlon GRANT(S) to the Cily of Rancho Cu<ampnp, • MunicipJ Corpootion, an EASEMENT for Ettte [, hfgh~ey end related purpoee• In, over vd upon Ihel attain real propeNy in the Cily of RanchD Cucamonp, County of San Bemvdino, Slate of CeU(onAia, Described u FoUowf: SEE ATTACHED :JIN[BIiS Doled ______ _ GENERAL ACNNO WLEDOMENT 51Nlol _,__1 onlmf me_ear of _ts_,nelon me, 1) S} r:owly al me unOYflpnetl Nplny PYLIr[, peROntl1Y eDDeend 1'I psVOnalq known le mf praree la mf on lne Lavf of falbpclorY erlEenc! m Lelb Porto^Ul+nofe nmersl _ _fuL¢rlbed In lM wVMnlnflrumenl. fne ¢f nOwle00e0lntl euwlad ll W IlNE05 my nlnd m0 plLmel uY Noiiiy ~ Siumiim iN 15 I9 A f,EMERAL ACANONLLOGEHENT. pt[AS[ V56 PROPLR Af ANONLLOGEN[MTr [.6. ppp THEpSHI p, CCppOPAT[r ETC. ExHiui? n- S l.e0e1 1>aecrlptlvn Por Street lligtvey end Related Purpoeee + on Lark Or!Va oediratad to tLe CSty o[ Rancho curaa~nge Thnse porcfeu e( tM t~rteriT 1/2 of tM Norttnert 1/1 0[ the Northeert 1/1 of Section ]1, T1H, 464, Sen ee[rurdlm Mes aM Meridian, to tM CvwtT of Sen ecnurdlro, Scv[e of Cal SForda, - vrdlns co [M United Stater Covenaenc Srnuhip plat rppro•ed 6T [M SurvTo[ccem[d, dried NoveaM[ U, 1845, a[ ehom on cM Rnco[d o[ SugeT ttcacded !n 4ook U, Pege >2, recardr In tM off.ice of tM Cew[T 4ecordeq o[ [br CoVn[[ a[ Av 3ar[urdlro, de¢rf bed a fallua: Parcel •4• 1La SouHrrlJ 52.00 feet tberaof. Puol •e" 439INIII3C en tM Nortbut corner of [M SwtM[1T 62.00 Eset of uid CeeC 1/2, NottMert 1/1, Northeu[ 1/6, Sre<Ivn Ji, Ti M, R6V; 71mC6 potthed[ dv~ CM Beuarll llm of uid e.rc 1/2, Northvrt 1/1, Northeu[ I/1, Seetlen )i, TIN, R6Y, a dlatarca o[ 10.00 [eac to . po/n[ on • llm dra.n pardlel dtA rid 10.00 fsa North .euwM at right anglo o[ tM NoctMd[ llm eE uid Sw[herly 52.00 [eu; TlmlQ 3aatarlJ dons uid prd Ll iLle • dbtacea o[ 215.36 Eaet to pvlnc on . n,µanc curs conch SwtMrl9 Mriug • ndfw of f)0.00 fret; TI®1CJ< 3.rtazly deng uid <ur.e [htough • netrd aryJe of 09 degrau W N11111taa O) coNr a dbur,ce o[ 64.06 het toe pelne on • revue nogene curve e NertM[I) Mdng . udlw of 3TO.Od (eat, . redid of add nugent r a¢vr through uid polvt been 3 09 degree 11 dmlba 5) teeorde V; T1191C6 3ascerlT alon6 arld curve [hough • ontrd n131e e[ 09 degnu O/ dmcen 01 cvMa a a[c dbtarce of 53.56 fu[ ce • pain[ on uid No[[Mrl~ llro of acid SoucMrl9n 5200 4ec of eM 4avt 1/2, Ratth•ece 1/1, 4ertheut 1/d, Seetlvn )l, it N, R6V; 11mFC[ Yeuerl[ dv~ uid live . dLtanca of 191.96 [eat [v tM PpIRf OP e3CIA31NC. App[oalr[a Aru Paled A: J4,/20.L eq~urr [ut, 0.19 uua Parcel 3: 2,901.9 pwre 6ac, 0.06 area ExHIBIT A-(c if :a iy :3~ u i'1 t. ~L1 L~1 u~ '-` t0 ~; r. ~~i Z F _~~ LEI a ~~ S m 00 3 4 3 w ZZ QO a '- ~a O f. U U UN Q W O ~ f J as a1D `s J ._.. ~ __ (~IT1' (7F R:1tii: HU C'l'('AVI(1NGA STAFF REPORT DATE March 18, 1992 lU Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SIJBIECT: Conlinuinn F.ducatinn for Massage runs Recommendation: r- ~~ 1} r .~;~... ~~~ it is recommended that the City Council authorize staff and the City Attorney to prepare an amendment to the Massage Ordinance requiring continuing education for those licensed to perform massage in the City. Specifically it is recommended that massage practitioners show at least 12 hours of continuing education each year to keep Chair license current in the City. Rackgrou nd: The City Council requested that the staff rcscarch the Feasibility of amending the massage ordinance [o include a provision far continuing education. This research involved contacting the State Council on Post Secondary Education and the Southern California School of Massage. The State Council informed me that there were no S[atc guidelines for those practicing massage. The State's only involvement was to insure that the schools were offering useful courses and were not defrauding the students. They defined useful courses as those that would allow a student to qualify for work in the community which the school serves once they had completed all necessary coursework. I then called the Southem California School of Massage and asked how they arrived at Chu level of ]00 hours for a massage technician. The school's response was that most oC the surrounding communities required a minimum of (W hours of instruction in massage for someone to be licensed ro practice and fur this reason the school offers a course of instruction to meet local rcqui rem cot s. The intent of the City Council is to insure that massage technicians arc keeping up with the latest techniques and trends and are therefore providing a better service to their customer. i spoke with a number of practicing massage technicians in the Cily on the amount oC instruction that would be beneficial to their practice yet not overly burdensome in terms of cost and Lima. 'Che response from these technicians was that 12 l0 20 hours of instruction could provide valuable information and skills and not he cost prohibitive. These hours correspond to a weekend intensive course. The local school of massage offers several weekend intensive courses and special workshops throughout the year. These types of courses arc specifically Continuing Education for Massage Technicians March 18, 1992 Page 2 designed to enhance the skills of coure participants who already arc certiLed ~ or have previous instr~etion in massage. The City could require proof of continuing education [owzrd the next certificate given by the school bnt the state does not require the completion of a predetermined number of hours before a certificate can he awarded, and di Cfcrcnt schools may operate diffcrentiy. Also, if the City only requires attaining a certificate then there is no incentive for continued training once the cerificatc has been achieved. For the above reasons, staff is recommending [he ordinance be amended to require continuing education not necessarily associated with the attainment of a subsequent certificate in massage. IRespcclfully Submitted, DAR/dab d - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March IR, 1992 7b: Mayor and City Councilmembers hROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager BY: Jan Reynolds, Asst. Redevelopment Analyst r~,c.gnTOti ~% l \C9 ., ~;,' ~;> =° '~~ tit C x F U 2 _ > - 19]^ ~~ ~ SUBJECT': CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1. RF,COMMENDATEON: Consideration of a Resolution certifying the election results, an Ordinance authorizing the levy of the special tax, and a Resolution authorizing preliminary issuance of special tax honds in con}unction with Community Facilities District 91-i. BACKGROGND: At the December 4, 1991 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolutions declaring the intent to establish a Mello-Roos financing district and the levy of special taxes to finance public improvements in the undeveloped eastern portion of [he City. As part of that action, the Council also directed the City Clerk to conduct a special mailed ballot election of landowners within the boundaries of the District. ANALYSIS: On March 3, 1992, the City Clerk conducted a special election relating to the levy of special taxes, the issuance of bonds, and the establishment of an appropriation limit within the boundaries of Community Facilities District 91-1. By special mailed ballot, each landowner was entitled [o one vote for each acre, or portion of acre, within the District Results of the .aection indicate 90°!° of the votes cast in favor and 10% of the votes cast against the measures presented. The election results and a Resolution certifying the favorable election is attached. The attached Ordinance authorizes the levy of a special tax, as approved by 2/3's majority of the District property owners. The special [ax rate represents the maximum [ax that can be assessed since [he rate and apportionment of the special [ax is a function of the final bond amount and current interest rate. Addi[ionatly, property owners have been advised that they may further reduce the assessment on their property by dedicating versus being paid for necessary public right-of-way. Dedication not only reduces the assessment, but the total bond amount as well since the District wculd not have to purchase the right-of-way. Staff has begun the process of retaining a real estate appraiser to conduct an appraisal of properties within the District. Based on sufficient preliminary information, staff will begin meetings with each property owner io fully explain the right-of-way process and options available. In order to finance [he design and constructio^ of public improvements proposed by the District, the City Council authorized issuance of bonds in a maximum aggregate principal amount not to exceed $55 Million. This maximum bond amount was also approved by more than 2/3's majority of the District landowners. A Resolution has been attached which verifies approval of the bond amount by the majority Iznd owners and authorizes the preliminary issuance of bonds for Community Facilities District 91-1. Prior [o formal action to issue bonds, the City Council will review the final bond amount and assessment rates, which will be determined by the current interest rate and final cost estimate. Respectfully submitted, r !' Linda D, Daniels Deputy City Manager Attachments: Resolution Declaring Results of Election Ordinance Authorizing Levy of Special Tax Resolution Authorizing Issuance of Bonds d ~ ~. izESOlarrl~ ND. ga. 0 7s A RESOLUl'ION OF THE CITY CIX7.ICIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(7[0 CUCA[+r1NGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A "MEL[.0-[SOS C(YUMUNITY FACI,ITIFS IY`P OF 1982" SPECIAL TAX, BOI~ID AND APPROPRIATIOIZS LIMIT ECE(`t'IQd WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCFIO CUCAt3?NG4, CALIFORNIA (hereilafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local agency"1, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the levy of special taxes and the issuance of bonds in a camunity facilities district, as authorized pursuant to the terns a-d provisions of the "Me1lo-ROOS Caaturrity Facilities At:t of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Goverment Code of the State of California, said Camwnity Facilities District being referred to as CQi.^NNITY FACILITIES DISTRICP NO. 51-1 (VIC70AIA CCY4MIINITY) (herein- after referred to as the "District"); and, WHEREAS, said legislative body did call for aM order to be held an election to sutmit to the qualified electors of the District a proposition relating to the levy of special taxes a:d the issuance of bonds in the District and a proposition relating to the establishment of an appropriations limit for the District; ard, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measures lave been wted upon and did receive the fawrable 2/3's rote of the qualified electors, and this legislative body does desire to declare the fawrable resulte of the election in accordar:ce with the provisions of the Elect.irn~u Cade of the Stato of California. NOW, T4IEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pancho Cucamonga does hereby raselw as follows: SECfI(Xd 1. 1Yat. the alcove recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That this legislative tody hera`~y receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATE[7EtJP OF W1'F_S CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of rotes cast in the election, the measures wted upon, and the number of rotes given for arri/or against the measures voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is hereby directed, pursuant to the provisions of the Elections Cale of the State of California, W enter in the mi.mites tM results of the election as set forth in said S'^JrTEMENP OF 127PfS CAST. ~~ PASS®, APPRWED, and ADOPfII) this day of 1992. AYES: IrOFS: A~INP: ATf'ESP: City Clerk I, DEBR11 J. ADAMS, CITY C1ER1C of the City of Rancho Cucanonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wes duly passed, appxvved, and adnptRi by the City Council of the City of Pancho Cucannrga, California, at a xegulaz nesting of said City Council held on the day of , 1992. EXeouted this day of _, 1992. Debra J. Pdan~s, City Clerk ~.~~- CRICFIFICATE IX+ S[EL.TION OFFICIAL ~ AND S'171ffiFliP CF 4V1L+S CAST STATE OF CALIFOlaVL4 ) CQRTi7 OF SAN BEEa14ImINp ) ss. CITY OF RANCtp CUCAFLNC~1 ) I, DEBRA J. AC1nM5, F7.FX.TICN OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGIFI7NC~, COUNTY OF SAN HEfL`ARDINO, STATE OF CALIFY%IIiLA, DO HERFT3Y CERTIFY that puLSUant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the G;rvernrent Cade and Division 12, camrs:cing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the CT1Y OF RANLIU CUCAFLtiGA CC1MIIdiIT7 FACILITIES DISTRICT FA. 91-1 (VICTORIA COMIIMITY) SPECIAL MAIIF9 EALLOT ELFX.'PIQi in said City, held March 3, 1992. I FURTFR+R CEIfl'IFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in said District in said City, and the whole numher of votes cast for the Measure in said District in said City, and tTw totals of the respective colunms and the totals as shown for the Mriam,.a are full, true and correct. Tl7PAL N(AIDER OF 4C/lE5 CASE: II. TYPAL NCAfE~R OP 4VI£S FOR AND AGAINST PRDR757 PFICN A: AcAlrsr 65 III. TOTAL NUMBER OF VCri'ES NUR AND ACAII9ST PROPCSTTIGN Bs FOR 569 AGAINST 65 WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 4th day of March , 1992. n) ~'/ul/r .li ~ F~-Cl'ION OFF CITY OF RANC7p COCI+FDNCA STATE OF CALIFOFB~]IA F703IBIT "A" ORDINAIJ~ NJ. ~'~l~ r AN ORDINANCE OF 'Iffr: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIrKiE1CA, CALIFORNIA, AVitIORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN A COPB'6kdITY FACILITIES DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA[~DNC~, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter refereed to as the "legislative hotly of the local Agency"), has initiated pmceedi ngs, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a Favorable vote fms the qualified electors relat- ing to the levy of a special tax in a ca:nauti.ty facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terns and provisions of the "Me1lo-Rnos Commrnity Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Goverment Code of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). This Cammti.ty Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as C@SIIAdTTY FACILITIES DISTRICT f10. 91-1 (VICTORIA CCQASUNITY) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and, N(kl, 7f, IT IS HEREBY ORDAIta'D AS FOIdOh5: SECPIQJ t. 'that the above zecitals are all true ared correct. SECiTCN 2. That this legislative body does, by the passage of this Ordinance, authorize the levy of sp~ial taxes at the rate and fon:ail.a as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, referenwd and so incorporated. SE(.1'ION 3. That this legislative Cody is her'+eby further autho- rized, by Resolution, to detensine the specific special tax rate and almurrt to he levied for the then current tax year or future tax years, except that the special tax rate to be levied shall not e.~ that as set forth above, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate. SECTION 4. The proceeds of the above authorized and levied special tax may only he used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized horded irrdzbtedness; B. Necessary replenishrent of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities, services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Pct; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, as appropriate. The proceeds of the special tax shall be levied only so long as needEd for its purpose, and shall not be used for arty other purpose. ~', SECTION 5. Except for the prepayment of special taxes as provided for in bchi bit "A", the aWve authorized special tax shall hp collected in the sane marv~rr as ordu:ary ad valoran taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorsn taxes. SECTION 6. '17:e above authorized special tax shell be secured by tt~e lien iced pursuant to Sections 3114.5 and 3115.5 of the Streets and Hiyhways Code of the State of California, which lien shall be a continuing lien and shall secure each levy of the special tax. 1fie lien of the special tax shall continue in force and affect until the special tax obligation is prepaid, pernutrently satisfied and cancelled in accordance with Section 53344 of the Governnent Code of the State of California or until the special tax ceases to be levied by the legislative body of the local Agency in the m3nnsr provided in Section 53330.5 of said Governnent Code. SEC1'ICN 7. This Ordinance axd special tax shall be applicable for the referentied District, ae cell as arty future annexations. SEC1'IQd 8. This (A,dir~ance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk shall, cause this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933. INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho CuCallDngdr California, on , 1992; AND THETiEAPfER ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucartoiga, California, held on the ~ day of 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: City Clerk .~J,-J ~I I, DEBRA J. ADADS, CITY CLhW( of the City of Ranch Cucaoronga, California, do hereby certify that the fox~9oing Orciinarne was du]y passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaimnga, California, at a xe9ulaz n~ti.nq of said City Council held on the day of , 1992. Enzuted this day of _ _, 1992. Debra J. Adana, City Clerk Revised November 20. 1991 EXHIBIT a o RATES AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR COMMUNTTY FACILTTIES DISTRICT NO. 91.1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF 'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A Special Tax, the "Special Tax(es)" (defined below), shall be applicable to each Parcel (defined below) located in Community Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community) of the City of _ Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter "CFD No. 91-1"), The amount of Special Tax to be collected from each Parcel in any Fiscal Year (defined bebw) shall Fre deuraritred by the City Council of the - City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "Council" and the "City"), acting in its capacity az the legislative body of CFD No. 91-1, in accordance with the rate and method of apportionmen[ described below. All of the property in CFD No. 91-1 unless exempted by law or Section F below, shall h taxed for the purposes, to the exten[, and in the manner provided herein. A. DEFINITIONS "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official trap of the County Assessor of [hc County _ ~ of San Bemardirto designating Parcels by Assessor's Parcel Number. - "Alternate Special Tax Rate" for Developed Property which is Residendal Property moans that amount of tax computed by mWtiplying the number of Ne[ Taxable Acres contained within a fatal subdivision map, parcel map, or functionally equivalent map or instrumene by the applicable Alternate Special Tax Rate az sperified in Table 1 below. The resulting produce is then divided by the number of Parcels (in the case of single family - residential dwelling units or condominium or other multi-family dwelling units where only one dwelling unit is located within a Parcel) or dwelling units contained in said map. The resulting quotient is the Alternate Special Tax Rate for each Parcel or dwelling unit created by said final subdivision map, parcel map, or functionally equivalent map or instrument A-1 Revised Novemlxr 20, 1991 For Developed Property which is Non-Residential Property, the Altercate Special Tax Raoc - shall Ire the amount per Na Taxable Acre az specified in Table 1 below. "Assigned Spedal Tax Rak" [Weans the applicable Special Tar per Parcel based on the applicable rate per dwelling unit or Net Taxable Acre az spx~ed in Table I below. "Developed Property" means, as of Iuly I of any Fiscal Year, all Parcels for which a _ fatal subdivision [nap, parcel man err functionally equivalcn[ trap or instrument creating lots or parcels upon which residential traits may 6e consmteted or creating lots or parcels for '- comutetcial and industrial development haz ban rocordcd prior to March 1 of the preceding Fueal Year. "Exempt Property" roeruts any Parcel or other property within CFD No. 91-1 described in Section F which is exempt from the levy of the Special Tax, "Fiscal Year" means the period starting on July 1 of any ytar and ending the following June. 30. "Matdmum Special Tax" for a Parcel of Developed Property, means the greater of the _ Assigned Spaial Tax Rate or the Alternative Spaial Tar Rate applicable to such Parcel. Maximum Spteial Tax for a Parcel of Undeveloprd Property, [[[cans the Assigned Special Tax Rate applicable to such Parcel az set forth in Table 1 below. "Net Taxable Acre" means an acre of Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, exclusive of property exempted by law or the provisions of Sation F below from the Special Tax; the acreage calculation for Developed Property will be based on the dimensions az shown on or calcutated from the recorded final subdivision map, parcel A-2 Revised November 20, 7991 map, a functionally equivalen[ map or instrument; the acreage calculation for UndevelopCR Property shall be the acreage shown on or calculated from the Assessor's Parcel Map. "Residential Property" means those Parcels upon which residential units may build. "Series A Bonds" means those bonds issued by CFD No. 1 to fund domestic water improvements, sanitary sewer improvements, road improvement-c, flood contra! and storm drain improvements, utility hnproventents, and rightof-way acquisition. "Series B Bonds" means those bonds issued by CFD No. 1 to fund conswcdon of the lakes Park in the Village of Victoria Lakes. "Non•Residential Property" means those Parcels which are not classified as _ Residential Propery or Farcmpt Property. _ "Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessors Pazcel Map with an assigned Assessors Parcel number as of the date of the levy of the Special Taxes for each Fiscal Yeaz. "Species Tax Requirement • A" means that amount required to be collected from Tax - Rate Zones 1 through IS in any Fiscal Year to pay: (1) debt service on all Series A Bonds or oNer indebtedness of CFD No. 91-1 related to the improvements as described N the defudtion of [he Series A Bonds, (2) cosu incurred by the Ciry and CFD No. 91-1 in the annual levy and colection of the Special Taxes related to the Series A Bonds, (3) other reasonable costs of CFD No. 91-1 related to the administration of the Series A Bonds, and - (4) any amounts required to replenish any reserve funds established N association with the n-3 Revised November 20, 1991 Series A Bonds. N calculating the Special Tax Requitement - A for a Fiscal Yeaz items (ti through (4) shall be net of bond rrservc carvings and other interest carvings described in me bond resolution for the Series A Bonds reasonably expected w be available, except those carvings that may tx requited fa rcbau pttn, ores. "Special Tax Requirement - B" means that amount required to be collected fmm Tax Rau Zone 16 in any Fiscal Year to pay: (I) debt service on all Series H Bonds or other indeb'~edness of CFD No. 91-1 related to improvements described in the defuution of the Sores B Bonds, (2) costs incurred by the Ciry and CFD No. 91-1 in the annual lery and collection of the Special Taxes related to the Series B Bonds, (3) othu reasonable costs of CFD No. 91-1 related to the administration of the Series B Honds, and (4) any amounts required to replenish any reserve funds established in association with the Series B Bonds issued and sold for CFD No. 91.1. In calcuating the Special Tax Requirement for a Fiscal Year, items (1) through (4) shall be net of bond reserve earnings and other in[ercst carvings described in the bond resolution for the Series B Bonds reasonably expected to be avai]able, except those eartungs that may be , equired for rebau purposes. "Special Tax(es)" means the Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on all Parcels to fund Dither the Special Tax Requirement - A or the Special Tax Requirement - B. "Taxable Property" means all Parcels in CFD No. 91-1 which ate not exempt fmm the levy of Special Taxes pursuant to law or Section F below. "Tax Rate 7gne" means any of the sixteen (16) Tax Rau Zones listed in Table 1 hereof to which a Parcel is assigned as a result of its location on the Tax Rate Zone Map included as Figure 1. 7+-4 `- Revised Novemlxr 20, 1991 "Undeveloped Property" means al! Patcels in CFD No. 91-I which are not classified as Developed Property or Exempt Property. "Victoria Community Plan" means the Victoria Community Plan of the Ciry of Rancho Cucaznonga adopted by the City Council on May 20, 1981 as may be subsequendy _ modified, supplemented or amended. "Victoria Lakes" means the Village of Victoria Lakes as shown in the Victors Community Plan. "Vicoria Windrows" means the Village of Victoria Windrows as shown in the Victoria Community Plan. B . ASSIGNMENT TO TAX RATE ZONE - For purposes of detemtining the applicable Maximum Special Tax as specified in Table I in Section D below, all Taxable Property shall be assigned to one of the Tax Rate Zones ptm:ttant [o Figute 1. C. ASSIGNMENT TO TAX CLASS - For each Fiscal Year, all Paroels within CFD No. I shall be classified either as Developed Property, Undeveloped Property, or Exempt Property. Additionally, each Parcel of lxveloped Property within Tax Rea Zones 1 and 4 shall be assigned to a Tax Class within _ such Tax Raa Zone depending upon its density calculated by dividing the number of Parcels or dwelling units in [he rcorded subdivision map, parcel map, or functionally - equivalent map or instrument in which the Parcel is included by the Net Taxable Acres as A-5 Revised November 10, 7991 contained therein and shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with Ille retes and method of apportionment xt forth in Sections D and E below. D. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES The Maximum Special Tax for Parcels within each Tax Rate Zone for each F"iual Year for Developed Property shall be the greater of the Assigned Special Tax Rate or the Altemate Special Tax Rate, and for Undeveloped Ptopeny shall be the Assigned Special Tax Rate all asset forth in Table !below. ff Developed Property which is Residential Property has ban subdivided and/or developed so as to result in a density which does not fall within any of the Tax Qasxs defined for any Tax Rate Zones xt forth in Table 1, [he Assigned Special Tax Rate for each Parcel or unit within such final subdivision map, parcel map, or functionally equivalent map or instrument shall be the greater amount of the applipble Assigned Special Tax Rate set forth in Table 1 or the aruowt calculated ruing dre applicable Alternate Spaial Tax Rate x[ forth in Table 1. If the land ux of a Para! within any given Tax Rau Zone changes from the applicable Luul ux shown on Table 1, the Assigned SpaiaL Tax Rare for such Parcel shall be the Alternate Special Tax Rate, which would have ban applicable to such Parcel had its land use not changed. A-6 EF ~ U ~ V N _°F 6 W ~ U E w F ~ F~ ~~ ~~GG~ ~ a a a a a u u u u u u a L L L ~ A K M F F F F F F= z z z~ z z ~~~~zt ~ m m m m m m x o0 00 00 ro oo ro m oo vi 6/f W 69 M K V9 ~j$ u '~J ~ V~ %~ P 6.G 4.m rn H' a ~. 0. rE ~ q ~F N ~ p~ 0o r ~o ~ E 'S ~~,«,«.~,4.z,..z.;z U U U U < a a a ~ A A A A p rn o rn o T M 'R f~1 'C d O O d d e oo ~ ao d i a a c c '3 '~ ~ q v •n •n •a - .- c c c u u v c v C !X u u v 3 ; a a ~ "'666p '9p ~~~~~~ ~ ~ p~ 7 7~ 7 7~ a :J Oq U A W 0. < W , u fJ I u J a u u f] A F F z z ~. ~. a o°Oo N m N W N ¢ ¢ ' a = yy A ~ m ~''~ g 4 4 4 00 ~• " z «.z «, wz U 6 A r 0 6 lS •~ ~ a 7 6 W ~~ a p 4 W t u F z ~t M N M F Q ~ ~ u ~ ^F m ~~ «, ~ z V a a O d a~ u i ;a u a ] a w u a z ~, N t+1 O Q P ~-~ ~rO Fr N a w ~F a 2 G u fA 1 ~F 4 .~ V u L N F a FE y u ~ U ~ ¢ ~ 6 `' U U _U V I V U ~ L d m n ~ (~ F F F F z z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ s p o p "' ~ o I w w w ~y _ a ¢ .. ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a u •~ _ u u u ., ~ Y „dry `~ ~a ~~ K~ e~; o~ ~ v~ Z{. ~~ rn~ ~~ ~ r~ o~ o~ d~ r'iF ~ NF vi NF' ?F PF N `r°.F yF ,r., E" h~ u P h u m vi u o 5 m ~ m vi ++ oo u ~ u vs w~ w ink N HZ wz w,L w v.2 w7 w~L U a < a~ O A O La 0 o q ~ N N N ~ d d d e ti ti ~ N c u 44 u c u ] ~ ~ ~ at a a w law la w G p ~ ~ (~ O G[[FjZSZ'7t7tj 8 u ~ ~ a ~ ~ Ee6j 8 i u 7 la w law la w O 9 a" t~ w, i~ i~ o I~ IQ t n-u ~o rn 0 a ~pe V P F u u u u I G ~ '~ d 6 I Q d ~ d -t '¢ u u u u u u 2S ~ .a a % F "~ F F F F F F uF' 7 L 2 2 z ~ p~ p2t ~ x ti m O O N O C{ V ~O~pp O, H ~ ~ N ~ b w w w ~ p p p yy {{~~ }}~~ yy p F~ pp pp G G G G 6 G 6 G G G " G ~a'•~3( u6 Q old uu-t Q yyC Q Q yyQ yd ~y `¢ B p 0.N ~yN 4N 6~ ~ u 0.~ ~O Y b G4L (.wN d 0 aLV Y ryry 0. ~ $$'` ~F" ~~iF $F ~(~ ~E gh '4+F rvFa-, ^F ^F:, 4F ° rnF 6 NZ rju ~ u e'u ~u ~3 ~u yj 'u ~u ^~u °' ~u y ~.2~ w?. N~ wz, wZ wx w.G w2~ w2 .nz w wz G yyc ,,55 F~ 3~ ~~ Q O F ~ ^ ~ J'- .'~ o a s s s b_ ~ ~ ~ ~ o u ~ u .~ u ~ u S ~ S 7 S ~ S ~ a ~ a F e < W 6 RJ < RJ 6 to d fA < R1 a~ r, a ~ a F~ ., .. A-9 • u p e rn Revised November 20, 1991 E. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAXES 1. Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for Special Tax Requirement • A On or prior to August 1 of each Fiscal Year or such other date as may be established by law, the Council shall determine Special Tax Requitement - A for such Fiscal Year and shall levy the Special Taxes as follows: Stro 11. The Spu:ial Taxes shall be level on all Parcels of Developed Properly in Tax Rate Zones 1 through 15 at 100 percent of the Assigned Special Tax Rate; however, if this amount exceeds Special Tax Requuetoent - A, the levy of Special Taxes on all Parcels of Developed Property shall be proportionally decreased until the revenues produced thereby will be equal m Special Tax Requitement - A. rev 2: H the revenues which may bo produced by levying the Special Tax pursuant ro Step I are tess than Special Tax Requirement - A, the Special Taxes shall be levied proportionally on all Parcels of Undeveloped Property in Tax Rate Zones 1 through 15 up w 100 percent of the Assigned Special Tax Rate to produce aggregate revenues equal to Special Tax Requitement - A. Steo 3: If the revenues which tnay be produced by levying the Special Tax pursuant [o Steps 1 and 2 are less dtatt the Special Tax Requirement - A, the Special Taxes shall be levied proportionally on all Paroels of Developed Property up to 111090 of the Alternate Specie! Tax Rate w produce revenues equal to the Special Tax Requirement - A. n-lo Revised November 20, 1991 2, Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for Speciat Tam Requirement • B On or prior to August 1 of each Fiscal Year or such other date as may be established by law, the Council shag detemdne Special Tax Requitement - B for such Fiscal Yeaz and shall lcvy the Speciat Taxes as follows: Ste° 1: The Special Taxes shall be levied on all Parcels of Developed Property in Tax Rate - Zone 16 at 100 percent of the Assigned Special Tax Rate; however, if this amount exceeds Special Tax Requirement - H, the levy of Special Taxes on all Pazcels of Developed Property shall be proportionally decreased until the revenues produced thereby will be equal ro Special Tax Requirement - B. - $~; ff the revenues which rosy be produced by levying the Special Tax pursuant to Step 1 are Icss than Special Tax Requirement - B, the Special Taxes shall he levied proportionally on all Parcels of Undeveloped Property in Tax Rate Zone 16 up to 100 percent of [he Assigned Speciat Tax Rate to praluce aggmgate revenues equal to Special Taz Requirement - B. $tGD3: If the revenues which may be produced by levying the Special Tax pursuant to ' Steps 1 and 2 are less than the Special Tax Requirement • B, the Special Taxes shall be levied proportionally on all Parcels of Developed Property up to 100',6 of the Alternate Special Tax Rats to pt9duce revenues equal to the Speciat Tax Regtt'vetra;nt - B. Revised Novem!xr 20, 1997 F. EXEMPTIONS The Board shall not levy a Special Tax on the following propertes which may as of the dale of famadon of CFD No. 91-1 be: • Properties owned by stale, federal, or other local govemrnents, except as otherwise provided in Sccrion 33317.3 of the Govematent Code; • Property widtin CFD No. 1 which is dedicated for the purpoxs of eonstrucdng CFD - funded road facilities; • Approxirnakly 23 acres of property within CED No. 1 which are to be dedicated to the City for the i "4^ Park within the VWage of Victoria Laltos; - Property within CFD No. 1 to be dedicated to or owned by the Southern California Fslison Company, the use of which is limited to udliry purposes. • Those Parcels at entry ways and along perimeter areas used for landscaping which are dedicated to and maintained by the Ciry, Parcels or portion of Parcels conveyed or irrevocably offered for tiedicarion w a public - agency afkr formation of CFD No. 91-1, and not otherwise exempt pursuant to this Section F, shall be subject to the levy of the Special Taxes pursuant to Scetion 33317,3 or Secdon 33317.3 of the Government Code and shall be assigned a Tax Rate pursuant to Section B. A-l7, ~- Revised November 20, 7991 G. MANNER OF COLLECTION _ Except for the prepayment of Special Taxes as provided for herein, the Special Taxes shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ad valorem property taxes, - provided; however, that the City Council may authorize the collection of delinqucn[ Special Taxes by judicial foreclosure proceedings pursttant to Sccrion 53356.1 of the Government Code. H, PAYOFF OF SPECIAI, TAXES - 1, ~ypBymrnt of Special Taq{¢ Epr TaY ate n e l hm, h l . The owner of any Parcel within Tax Rate Zones 1 through 15 tray dischazge the - Special Tax obligation applicable to such Parcel in whole or in part at any time by matting a one-rime paytant calculated as follows: (a) Compute the presen[ value of the Parcel's remaining payments of the Maximum - Special Tax at the weighted average yield on Series A Bonds issued for CFD No. 91-I. - (b) Multiply (a) above by the proposed prepayment percentage to determine the prepayrrtatt amount (c) Add the following amounts to (b) above: _ Call pt~mium as trquired in the bond instrument and • Interest on (b) at the applicable bond rate for each year from the date of - prepayment, if any, to the earliest available bond call date. (d) Subtract the following amount from (c) above: - The applcable portion of the Parcels pro rata share of the bond reserve fund of the Series A Bonds issued for CFl) No. 91-1. A-13 Revised November 20, 1991 (e) Subtract the following amount from (d) above: • Lturest earnings to be generated at a reinvestment rau as detemvned by CFD No. 91-I from the date of prepayment to the earliest available bond cal date. (f7 Add the following amounts to (e) above m de[ermine the Parcels pupaymen[ 8In0UnC • Unpaid Special Taxes which may have been enrolled on the Assessors tax roll; • Interest and penalties, if applicable, which may be associated with unpaid Special Taxes; and • An administrative fee to cover the costs intoned by CFD No. 91-1 associated with calculating the amount of prepayment, redeeming bonds, and preparing amended tax bills. The Maximum Special Taxes as set forth in Section D for a Parcel utilizing a prepayment percenrzge less than 100% shall 6e reduced in subsequent fiscal Years by multiplying the Maximum Special Tax by the prepayment percen[age actually used in Section Kl (b). _ An owner may also p[epay and discharge a portion of the Special Tax obligation applicabie to a Parcel by dedicating right-of-way, the application of which would -- otherwise be financed by CFD No. 91.1, so long as such dedication is consummated prior to such deadline as may be established by the Ciry Council. 2. p6Davmene of SnrrL Ta*es for Tax Rate-7.~ne 16 The owner of any Pamel within Tau Rate Zone 16 must discharge the Special Taz _ obligation applicable to such Parcel in full through the prepayment of the Special Tax _ Revised November 20, 1991 ;~ per IM or unit as t ptuondition to the issuance of a building permit for such Pare;,(. The amount of the prepayment shall be calculates as follows: (a) Determine the total remaining bond principal outstanding for Series B Bonds. _ (b) Subtract from (a) above the the total rnmai„ing bond reserve fund for the Series B Bonds. - (c} Divide the insult of (b) above by the total r<mainvtg planned residential lots or wits in Tax Ram Zone 16, including the units for which this calculation is being Performed. ' (d) Subtract the following arrrount fmm (c) above: • Interest earnings ro be generated at a reinvesonent rate as detcrtnined by - CFD No. 91-1 from the dale of prepayment ro the earliest available bond call dare. (e) Add the following amowts to (d) above m determine the Parcel's prepayment _ enwant: Call premium as required in the bond instrwnent, '_ Inrerest on (v) at the applicable bond rate Erom the date of prepayment to the earliest available bond call dare, - Unpaid Special Taxes which rosy have been enrolled on the Asussoi's tax roll, • Interest and penalries, if applicable, which may be associated with unpaid _ Special Taxes, and • An administrative fee to cover the costs incumd by CFD No. 91-1 - associated with calculating the amount of prepayment, redeeming bonds, and preparing aroendcd tax bills. F~^1S ,.: 1 I~,' . I ' ~~ _.z '~ _~: .I. ~'i ~~~i ~~; :~~ ~I- I "~ _ ~' w~ J - ~~~~• :~. 1 j1- i I;; ., ,, ~~ ;~ ~I . ~, •~ . ~;ril .M t{. ~. it 0 ''~., wr,: G ' ~ ,'. I I~j~ ~M~ .I;. • ~ ~1 I'll ~ ~ IIN' ~ .. _ I. 1 ) ~ 11 fOll~ ~'~1 11 ~~ ~~ •~„ '1'' II ~'' ~ _ 11 ` t + l~ l~l.~ ~."'I 1a;~, ..^-a III O I~ I Q ' ` V ~n,~l ~~~! ,I ~~.~. ;ti _ ___. ~~- .. o l o 1 I 1Q-fj..., .:~ r;~ :. ~{: ~ ~~:. • '1. I sl ~ Iii: LI~. ~i :. _r:,._ _.. ,.II I ~~... . ~,: ' TAX RATE ZONE MAP ~~ LEGEND " e~-~"-.`,-~ ~Er O T~ anTe zoNE hli~ Y~~'+~-u- NO SCN.E_ OASEMM'QIArtCIi01JIlA~TM"N t p-"F. ~~ Nu. 9a, o~~ A RESOIdfPI(N OF THE CITY CCVNCII. OF THE CITY OF RANCIA CUGNLEJ!,A, CALIFORNL4, AU1filA2IZING PRELIMINARY ISSUANCE OF B&RIDS OF A CCdMEJNPI7 FACII,PPIES DISTRICP WHEREAS, the CIT7 COUNCIL of the CITY OF FAM7i0 CUCAIZN(~1, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency") has heretofore urdertalcen proceedings and dPClared the necessity to issue bonds on behalf of a ComRUtity Facilities District pursuant to the terns and provisions of the "Me1lo-ROOS Comnurity Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 25, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Govermwnt Code of the State of California. Said Cotnnurtity Facilities District is designated and loam as C(PPNNIT7 FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 91-1 (VICTORIA COFAIUNITY) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and, SrI~REtS, pursuant to law an election was held and the following propositions attaohed as Exhibit "A" hereto were approved bl' more than 2/3's of the voters voting at said election; and, WHEREAS, this legislative body now desires to preliminarily authorize the isalfAtYYa of such special tax bonds and to authorize the initiation of jidicial validation proceedings. NOW, THEREtC)RE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanmrga does herelry resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are ail true and correct. SECTION 2. That the legislative body hereby authorizes the issuance of all special tax borxis of Community Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Connunity). The exact tevre and cronditions of the issuance of such special tax hinds shall be subject to the provisions of th=_ "Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as arrended, and such further Reno- lotion or Resolutions of Issuance as shall. he adopted by this legislative b~Y SECTION 3. That Brown, Diven & Hentschloe, Boni Counsel, is hereby authorized and directed to forthwith file and pzosecute to final judcyrent, an action pursuant to Goverrnient Code Section 53359 arci Code of Civil Procedure Section 860, et saw- . , to validate pmcexiings pertainur~g Co the fornution of the District, the levy of authorized special taxes within said District, the issuance of. the special tax bonds as authorized herein. ~~3 PASSEL, APPPIJJED, and HDOPTED this day of 1992. AYES: NOES: A6SENP: AI^.FSi': City C1erY. Mayor I, ORBNA J. ADMS, CP1'Y C[EIIIC of the City of Rancho Cucaronga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approvcxl, and adopter by the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamorxla, California, at a regular ~etirg of said City Council held on the day of 1992. Executed this day of 1992. Debra J. Adatre, City Clerk ~~~ EXHIBIT p OFFICIAi, BALLOT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 91-1 (VI C'fORIA COMMUNITY) OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIAL BOND, SPECIAL TAX AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT ELECTION March 3, 1992 You are entitled to cast votes. r To vote, stamp a cross (+) in the voting square after the word "YES" or after the word "NO". All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing marks ar'e forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the City Clerk and obtain another. PROPOSITION NO. A: Shall Community F'acili~ies District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "District") incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in the maximum agar=gate principal amount of $55,000,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to exceed tha maximum interest. rate permiCCed by law, the pcoceeds of which will be used to finance the co r~struction, purchase, modification, expansion, improvement or rehabilitation of public facilitres to 6e owned, operated and maintained by either the City of Rancho Cucamonga or other appropriate public agencies (collectively, the "Facilities"), as provided in Resolution Na. 91-277 of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and shall YES a special tax with a rate and rate and method of apportionment as provided NO in the Resolution of the City Council 7861u/7.683l002 A-1 of the City of Ranchc, CUbamOnad esta6lishin9 the District, adopted on November 6, 1991 be y levied to pay for the Facilities, for the creation or replenishment of any neressary reserve funds, for any- incidental expenses of the District, any expenses associated with the Facilities or the bonds, and fur the payment of the principal of and interest on such bonds? PROPOSITION !]O. B: For each year comrz~e acing with Fiscal year 1991/92, shall the appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B YE.i of the California Constitutior„ for Community Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Com~u r,i ty) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga NO be ar, amount equal to $55,000,000.00? __ 7851u/2G03/002 A-2 - - -- CITI' OF RANCHO Cl'('AbiOtiCA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FFiOtit Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF CALIOFRNIA CITIES INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION BOUNDARIES z.., _ -. ~, F"7~ The League of California Cities Inland Empire Divison established a task force to consider the boundaries of the {nland Division. Gary Pitts, the League President has provided correspondence dated March 2, 1992 which provides the questions for City Councils to consider and a "Pros and Cons" fact sheet. The League is asking City Council's to respond to the task force by March 27, 1992. As a way of a brief update, the League of California Cities is an association of incorporated cities and functions as an "arm" of cities. The League provides training, legislative tracking and research for associate cities. The Cify of Rancho Cucamonga's Delegate to the League is William J. Alexander, Mayor Pro Tem and the Alternate is Dennis L. Stout, Mayor. ~Respectf S milted, ~-- Diane O'Nea Management Analyst II Attachment: Gary Pitts, League President's correspondence dated March 2, 9992 a~~ .........a, M~ MAR 41992 ~, unczxs~a 1 ,, vi ,.-= -/ ,4larch 2, ]992 Dear Council hfember; A task force has been appointed to consider the boundaries of the Inland Division of qre League of California Cities. The task force has decided to take an advisory vote ojthe cities in the district fo determine further actwn. We ask that the issue be placed on your council's agenda with u response to the task force by Alarch 27, 1992. The questions jar the councils are us follows; Shall the Inland Tmpire Division of the league of California Cities retain the existing division boundaries? Yes m l~'o If the bacndaries are changed, wkiclt new dishict boundaries would you jm~or? A. ,San Bernnrrlino (except the upper desert) us' one division and Riverside County as the other; or It. Wes!ern Riverside County cities (WRCOG) and Weriern San Berrtarlino Courtly cities (all cities other than Twenty Nine palms, Yucca Valley, and Needles) as orte division; Eastern Riverside Cnun[y (CVAG cities and Blythe) as the other division lvifh discussions to consoler the possibility of 75versty Nine Palms, Yucca Valley, and Needtes lem~ing the Desert Mountain Division to join this one. The study arises from a proposal last year to split the division in half wllh Riverside County becoming one division, and .San Bernarrlirw, except the upper deseK (which is in [lte Desert bfountain Division) becoming another. 34272 VUCAiPFl F3LVD., VUCA6'A, CA 92399 • PHONE (714) 7972489 • FAx (714) 7909203 ~7S =~ rtrv nF the task force consists of three council members and one city managerjrom each county, and a representative of the League (names attached). It has idemfied qre pros and cons of creating rsew district boundaries (attatched). There appear [o be no overriding advantages or disadvantages to any of [he options and the task force has deerded that its recommendatiors will be based primarily ors the preferences of the individual cities. /f p is determined [o sp[k the division, the proposal will go to the Slate League Beursdary Commiltee consisting of all 15 division presidents, in July. Ijapproved, it will be presented as a resolution at the annual conference. Please contact any oJlhe task force representatives for further injorntalion or clarification. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ Cary Pitt League Presiders[ Alfachments ~~ PROS A.ND CONS OF LEAGUE D!V/SION SPLI'P Advantaees of Division Snlit Along County Lines T. Would provide greater representation on League Board and on policy eonnnrttees. 2. Would offer greater opportunities jor local ojfcials to hold League leadership positions. 3. Wouldl provide an opportunty to discuss common county problems. 4. Mould offer an oppoRuni[y to develop a unified cnrtnty-wide position on State and Federal Iegislatior.. ,Vote: Items 3 and 4 can now @rgely be accomplished through SANBAG in San Bernardino County. The Mayors' and Cnunci! Members Conference would be the mechanism (a Riverside County. Disadva_ntaees o(Division Spli! Alone ConnN Lines 1. Would reduce the opportunity to discuss regional (inter-county) issues. 2. Would reduce the opportunty for officials Jront adjoining cities in djfferent counties to interact and discuss common problems (e.g., Riaho and Riverside, Calirnesa and Yucaipa, etc.) 3. VSbuld encourage other League divisions (esp. Los Angeles County) to sp(R perhaps to the point that any addttiorra! League representation gained would be dilu(ed to the paint of ineffeetiveaess. 4. l5'ou1J lem~e a remnant of San Bernardino County which would consist of 14 cities (abcent the mounmin and desert communities) as a separate League Divisian- 5. Would reducc the opportunity for city mmmgers of the two ceunties fo in(eract (unless the managers of boUi eouaties continue to meet jointly). A/[crrralives 1. Riv¢rsule Chanty, could attend a bi monthly Mayors' and Catncil Members' meeting to discuss Riverside County issues and use the alternating bi-monthly Inland Empire League meeting In discuss inter-county issues and issues of statewide cnncera. 2. The 6i-moredtly Grlaad Empire League ntee(iug could be preceded 6y separate courtly caucuses to discuss topics of inleres( (o only Hirerside County or San Nerrtartlina County. 3. Rather tkan splh the Division along county Imes, split off die lower desertJrorn the rest of the Division. ~ov IN/.AND EMPIRE DIVISION LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ROSTER Council Member Gary Pins Council Member Gary Boyles Cky of Yucaipa City of Fontana 34272 Yucaipa Blvd. 8353 Sierra Ave. Yucaipa, CA 92399 Fontana, CA 92335 City Manager Joseph P. Guuetta Council Member Bill Franklin City of Nemet Cky of Corona 450 E. Lalham Ave. 815 W. Sixth Street Nemec, C,A 92343 Corona. CA 91720 Alayor Byron Matteson Mayor Richard S. Xe11y City of Crand Terrace City of Palm Desert 22795 Barton Road 73510 Fred Waring Drive Grand Terrace, CA 91324 Palm Desert, CA 92260 City Manager G¢rold F. Johnson Counerl Member William Arestein City of Rialto Crty of Indian Wells 150 S. Palm Ave 44-950 Eldomda Drive Rialto, CA 92376 ]rsdian Wells, CA 92260 League of Calj/antia Cities 602 E. Huntirsgtoa Drive, Suite C Monrovia, CA 91016 ABcrstion: Ms. Xim Chudaba .~ OI ~~~~~~~ March 3, 1992 Debbie Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Debbie: ~._.,;v.; ;,~, MAR 41992 GiYG.'FS(~ It has been suggested by the City Attorney that I appear before the City Council on the ttight of March 18th. The reason for my appearance is to resolve problems dealing with improvement bonds for the Winery Hill project at the comer of Baseline and Etiwanda. Please include a spot on the council calendaz so I may be heard. Thank you. Sincerely, ,~ 1 Andrew makian President sm 2~~ March 17. 1992 Cit}' Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Cen to Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Conditional Ilse Permit 90-20 -- Shell Oil Company Ref: Staff Report date6 March lg, 1992 In the above referenced staff reDOrt, Gnginecring condition number 5 states ")nstall the Base Line Road median IandscaDing from Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avcnuc." The condition is no longer relevant to the project in that [he designated landscaping is currently in place. Please inform the City Council members of the situation and that we will be requcstin(t removal of the condition at the City Council hearing, Since rcl y, FORMA ~corgc 1 ncodorou Agent for Shell Oil Company GPT:md (490/01.000) ce: Kathy Lucien, Shell Oil Company ~Oi9n Srv~r Cgnla~ Unva • Su4R I;fe• Rnnrno (}, ynrnnrvl.^. r,F ~17~94 • I i1e~, g8A~7297 ~ FAX ^ ~ +n nyee Ar.'., Jig"I~'.Plr erP^°nT, nP F 9k;~+r ~Grrll N., iJr.' in f„ -rb F4v'r ~VVtN ~ 9Vl [NF!!.^M1' N4N •F/v t'E,~M}F. NG [EaY4F5 n9~1G'E12 I5:?~ i Nlo i. i. ... ~, .. " 4 E C I Y O March 10, 1992 24r- William J. Marks ' Chairman, The Marks Group+ 2755 T'i llmore Street San Francisco, CA 94123 Aaar Mr. Marks: In connection with the proposed transfer of the cable television franchise, now held by bickinson California - Arizona Associates, Ltd. (dba DCA CaBlevision), to The Marks Group"k the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires that this latter serve as a Memorandum of rnderstanding and agreement between the city and The Marks Group. 1) The Marks Group accepts and will comply With all provisions o£ the DCA Cablevision franchise agreement, except those of Section o and 1Shibit C, which have been preempted by federal law. 2) In settlax~ent of bCA's nonccmpliance with Sections 5,5 and 7.2 (b) of the franchise egreement, The Marks eroup'r will pay, or cause to be paid to ihs city the sum of $67,663.00, prior to, but no later than, March 23, 1992. S.i_crultaneously, The Marks Grou will pay or cause to be paid to the City the sum of $3,035.26, to bring the past due franchise fees current to December 31, 1991. avrthermore, The Marks 6roup'ragr.ees to pay tha quazterly franchise fees on a timely basis which will be no more than 45 days beyond March 77, June 30, September 30 and December 31. It is agreefl that these payments will resolve al.l outstanding franchise no.icompliance issues, pending the outcome of the franchise. fee audit. 3) Within tbirty (30) days §§F~ter the effective date of the transfer, The Marks Group~shal ]. furnish to the City proof of carriage of the insurance required by Section 3.5 cf the franchise agreement, and concurrently shall. provide the secuxity fund required by .Section 7.6 Mtiyor Drnn!s L. Sovr• M,rynr {'ru iem WLllam J, Nexanuer Y. rte, _~' Jack ! am. NCP, City Manoye; 1CStY,l r:r,+<Centw ~rvu P.O, 6aa B07 RurK;ho Cuccntrny~t, CouncilmP.rnber Diane'NJlloms Ccuncllrruember Pamela) WrI9M CoundlrnomoEx Ghndae J. BuVUe: II y 9=.720 (i .G)oo^,-1851 . FA%(11~9W~(~;"J 4) The requirement of Section 7.2 (b) for a PEG access capital equipment grant of orie ($1.00) per su-bscriber per year shall continue sc long zs the current fr~lchise agreement remains i.n force. Z'he City agrees that it will request payment of any accrued grant funds and any recuired access channel capacity, in accordance with its access cabt.ecasting needs, as indicated by an access operating plan approved by the city council. T}1e City shall be responsible for cperati.ng costs under any approved plan. 5j Both parties agree that any acczved bvt une:rpended funds provided under Section 7.2 (b) may be utili2ed, at the Ciity's option, not only for access cablecasting egai pment and facilities, but zlso to flefer part of the cost o£ an interconnecticn system among the City's franchised cable systems, so that access nrcgrams can be tSansmitted simultaneously to all cable subscribers in t;he city. Please indicate your agreeaent by sign ing as indi-cated below and returninc one signed copy to the City by March 23, 1992. Sincerely, ~-~o -9Z- nATE Jack Lam AICp, Clty Manager city of. Rancho Cucamonga U.' ( ~SL~~e.--il--` 31(3 (~ ?_ DATE en--Eroup ~- YL1c~, (~ R-,.Q ~_iiG E-uAls~, "'~ /lF *r Afney n".. yie:a l/a/Cl« M r/4.a /-`w.~~ ~+.-w.~ s k, t/ do du ,/r ~.,/~ /13-ld ua lce. ~.sb. a-+Q ~~~ 2 n.t1.n-c/¢%~'N en N'ci 4~CA. V(~.,.(!teNUm. -ATE: Match 16, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the ty' o~nc it Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: erdd Buller, City Plapnei ~~~~ SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AHENDN~ENT 89-03 ENVI AONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO kESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14231 - V S HOME This memorandum hoe been prepared to brief the CLty Council members on the major issues moss likely to be rained by the appellant during their appeal hearing on Harch 18, 1992. Following each item, a brief analysis ie provided to clarify each discussion topic. This project took an exceptionally long time prior to being scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing because of the inatlequacy of the submittal. The application was initi al Ly submitted in May 1989, but not deemed complete until October 1991. The City Council may recall Ghat drainage of the Etiwanda area ie a critical feature of e11 development in that area. An adequate drainage report was not submitted for the project until late 1991. It Le also important to note that while this project was in process, the applicant filetl for bankruptcy, after which staff found the applicant either uncooperet ive or possibly unable to address the City~e concerns. In January 1991, the appl Lc ant had also filed a claim against the City which had heen rejected. The potential items for diacvesron are ae follows A. PLANNING DIVISION Etiwanda Scec if is pia Amendm n~ - The proposed Veating Tentative Tract Hap does not meet the minimum lot size requitemente under the Etiwanda Spec if lc Plan. Tha appellant had requested approval of an amendment to the Etiwanda SpecLf lc Plan for a retluced minimum average lot size. The Planning Commin eion felt this raqueet was inconeiatent with the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Eor promoting a more rural, country-like atmosphere and fcr preserving open apace, and hencs adopted a Resolution of Dsnial on January 22, 1992. Without t,~e amendment, the tract map cannot be approved. MAYOR AND MF.MEERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ESPA 89-03, VTT 14211 - U. S. HOME Ha rch 16, 1992 Page 2 "Grid" Street Pattern - Another reason the Planning Commies ion denied the pzopoaed subdivision is the "cookie-cutter^ layout and subsequent "grid" street pattern. Planning Commission policy and the General Plan require the use of curvilinear street patterns to promote more interesting acreetecapee throughout the City. Th ie design issue was raised very early in the development/design review process by both staff and the Commission, but the appellant has responded with only token changes. P. ENGINEERING DIVISION xhe tlevaloper had expressed concern over several Engineering issues throughout the review process but only debated four at the planning Commiaeien hearing, which we assume he will repeat at the city Council hearing. Those items are: 1. Miller Avenue Improvements: The project was conditioned to construct Mii Ser Avenue full width from Etiwanda Avenue to the project's seats r.ly bou ntlar y. The developer stated that he would be willing to construct half-width improvement e; however, the limits of those improvements were never defined. Staff feels the e[reet should be constructed full width with this project for public safety reasons. This is consistent with current improvement implementation policies adopted by the City council. The developer will be able to recover a substantial portion of the improvement costa as credits/re imbu reeme nt from the Transportation Oevelopment Fund and Eut.u ra development of adjacent property. 2. Etiwanda/Miller Avenue I t t' n Imoro vement s: The project was conditioned to improve the east half of the intersection, including some elope removal and retaining walla along the freeway embankment. The developer claims the coat to be S1 to S3 million, which he feels ie not justified for hie project. He ie willing to pay what he considers hie farr share. Staff feels the requirement ie justified, in that the intersection ie a part of the Etiwanda/Miller Avenue access route to the site. Staff feels the coat could be ae little as $2n0 theueantl. Also, the developer will be eligible for a partial reimburaeme nt from future development of adjacent property. F.z case Master Plan Drains v '1't C t T. he drainage plan for the project proposes to realign several City adopted master plan linos. The coedit ions require that the developer beat the additional coat of the realignment. The developer requested that hie obllgat ion be limited to a percentage proportional to hie prof ert'a acreage. The condition contains language to allow the issue tc be discussed during the plan check phase of the project, which includes a requ lrement to complete a modification to the Ctty Drainage Master Plan. Staff feels the Drainage MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CZTY COUNCIL ESPA 89-03, VTT 14211 - U. E. NOME March 16, 1992 Page 3 Master Plan modification process ie the proper forum to die case this issue because of the preliminary nature of the current information. C. COM.NUNI TY AND PARR DEVELOPMENT Or. October 19, 1989, U. 5. Home pre dented a proposed park p'_an for this project to the Park and Recreation Commieeicn. This was required because the General Plan designates a neighborhood park in the vicinity. Approximately 2.35 acres cf parklantl would be required ae their fair eF.a re of parkland in this area. The dev eloper'e propo eed park Bite included a mixture of tledic at ad parkland, off-a it_ land, utility right-of-way, and an interim flood basin. Staff was directed by the Commission to continue working with the developer on the proposed concept and acceptable park amenities. In December 1990, U. S. Home retornetl to the Park and Recreation Commission with a revised park plan for Tentative Tract 14211. The plan proposed at this meeting did not show a dedicated park facility, but rather proposed that a future Fark facility be located in the detention basin once that basin is no longer required far drainage purposes (10 - 15 ye are). Act irg Chairpere on Harry stated that the park facility should be provided at the time of development, that provie io ns for developing the park only in the detention boa in were not acceptable, and that dedicated parklands should be provided prior to final map approval. The Commission recommended that U. 5. Home and the adj acenC property owners work with staff to develop an acceptable park plan iE the project could not support a71 of the required parkland. staff race i.ved •eritten ccmmunications from John E. Hyman of U. 5. Nome dated Novemoer 5, 1991. This letter cants eted the City's requirement for Tentative Tract 14211 to include a park Bite based on their perceived hardship in having to fu rriiah the total area for the drainage basin. Further, they felt that some of the requirements shoo Ld be shared by all the develops re in this area. At the Ncvember 21, 1991, Park and Recreation Commies ion meeting, the Commission again reviewed the U. 5. Hnme project. Throe options were presented by staff to the Commieeron; dedi.catien of parkland, payment of in-lieu fee e, or a combination of both. A11 three options also included a request chat the on-site tlrainege area, being dedicated in fee to the City. be reserved for future parkland once the basin is no longer needed for drainage purposes. The Commission again chose the option that included the dedication of 2.33 scree (3 acres of parkland per 1,000 population) of one ncuniberetl parkland to the narih and cant iguoue with the 10.5 acres designated to drainage purposes on the tentative map. In atldlt ion, the Comm iseion requested that the area being dedicated in fee for drainage purposes should also be reeer:ed for futu re park MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF TitE CITY COUNCIL ES PA 89-03, VTT 14211 - U. S. HOME March lfi, 1992 Page 4 pvrpoeee once it ie no longer required for drainage. The comaniseion also requested chat staff determine if any o: the area currently shown as future ded icati.on for drainage purpoeee on the tentative map is not needed, and thus not dedicated, could be offered in fee to meet the park obligation in place of the 2.33 unencumbered acres being requested, thus allowing better access from the park Bite to the utility easements for future trail purposee. Since December 1991 the Park Development Division hoe had no contact with the developer regarding this project other than the applicant's appeal of the Planning commission'e action. B0:9M:sp CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAYfONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Jzh nary 22, 1932 .C: Chairman and Memb¢rs of the Planning Commission rr^ADN: Brad Puller, City Plann ez BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: RESDLJT ION OF DENIAL FCA ET IWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03 - U.S. HOME CORPDRAT ION - A ReSOluti on .'or the denial fot a request to amend certain dove lopment standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan as 3escribed below: 1) To allow single family detached residential development 'within the Ned i~nm Aesider.tial Uistri ct. (e-14 dwelling units per acre uti Lzing Basic Devel opmer,t Standards; and 27 :'o reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square Eeet to 8,900 square Ee et within the Low Medium Residential District r4-8 dwelling units per acne) under Has is Development Standards; and 3) To reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 8:500 square Ee et within the Medium Aestd¢nt ial District (B- 14 dwelling units per acre) under Basic Development Standards. fielated File: Environmental Assessment and Vesting Tentative Tract 14211. BAC KGAC7N D: On December. 17, 1991, the Planning Commission reviewed the above-referenced amendment and the related Vesting Tentative Map• At that meeting, the Commission continued the amendment to allow further discussion and denied Che related Vesting Tentative Map• one of the Findings for denial of the nap was its inconsistency with the current Etiwanda Specific Plan Development Standards. The Commiss LOn again reviewed this item on Jar,ua ry e, 1992, and recommended denial to the City Council. Also, the Commission directed staff to in it rate a series of works hoT~s to discuss the Uevelopment Standards within the Etiwanda area as they rel r. to to the basic goals and policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomanends that the Planning Commission edopt the a trached Resolution of Genial for Etiwanda Specific Flan Amendment 59 -03. ri.ty BB:SH: mfg Attachments: Resolution of Denial for Etiwanda Speci Eic Plan Amendment 89-03 CITY OF RANCHO CUC9~IONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of City Council Sack Lam, City Manager FROM: Steve Hayes~~sociare Planner SU &7 ECT: STAFF REPORT ATTACHME!1TE FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 ANp ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03 (U.S. HOMES] - BACI(G AOUNp INFORMATION FOR CITY COVNUL STAFF REPORT OF MARCH 18, 1992 Because oC the length of. the attachments `. or the above referenced project, staff is providing the following attachments Eor your review: Planning Commission Staff Reports dated January 22 and January 8, 1992, regarding Etiwanda Specific Plan 89-03 P Lann ing Consni ssion Staff Report dated December 11, 1991, regarding Vesting Tenteti ve Tract Map No. 14211 Planning Commission Minut ea dated January 22, 16, and R, 1992, and December 17, 1991 P lanninq Coam:iasion Resolution No. 91-192 de ry ing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14211 Planning Covm:ission Resolution No. 91-193 denying the Design Review for Vesting Tentative Tract Mao No. 14211 Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-07 denying Etiw an da Specific Plan 89-03 Please note that these items contarn information relevant co the Planning Commission's recnnmiendatione that are not discussed in great depth in the March 18, 1942 r_ity Council staff report. Thank you. Attachments SH:sp cc: Debbie Adams, City Clerk Jim Markman, City Attorney CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.4 STAFF REPORT ~~ DATE: December 11, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of the PLa nni ng Commission FAC M: Brad Huller, Clty Planner BY: Stsve Hayes, Asa ociate Planner SU OJECT: ENVIA ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TAACP 14211 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION - A proposed tentative tract map and design review for the development of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in the Medium and Low-Medium Residential Districts (H-14 and 4-8 dwelling unite per acre, respectively), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of the Dewre Freeway and west of East Avenue - APN: 227-231-01, 09, 12, 16, and 32; 227- 191-15, 227-181-24; and 227-261-11. Staff recro®ende issuance of a mitigated negative declare iion. Related File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amemm~ent 8~ ]3. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Vesting Tentative Ttact Map, site plan, building elevations, concepb~al grading and lardscapi:.g plans, and park area location and issuance of a mitigated negative declaration. Project Den si tY: 2.8 dwelllnq unite per acre. 8urrounding Land Use and Zon ina: North - - Existing single family residences and vacant; Low-medium and Medium Residential districts (4-8 and 8-14 dweiling units per acre, respectively) South - Single Family Residential and vacant ; Low-Medium and Medium Residential districts (4-H and 8-14 dwel li na_ units per acre, respectively) East - Existing single Family residences and vacant; Low-medium and Medium Resl dential districts (4-8 and 8-14 dwelling unite per acre, re apecti ve ly), City of Fontana West - Freeway right-of-way, existing single family residences, and vacant; Low-Mediua and Medium Res idential Districts (4-e and 8-14 dwelling units pet acre, respectively) 1:1i~Y ~r~ xnl~l;riu ~u~amvfvu~ ~ -~^?m., a:.~. ~ , STAFF REP~JRT ,_ ' '' - DA I'E: Ca Hoary 9, 1992 ~~ S TO: Chili Ynan and Menbers of the P:aanin9 Commission FkOM: Bead eui le r, City PlanneY ~, BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Pia ~~er SUHJEC^:: F,N'JI RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT l 99-03 - D.E. HOME COAPORAT ION - A request to amend certain develoument standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan as described below: 11 To allow single family detached residential development 'I within the Medivm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) utilizing Basic Development Standards; and 2) To reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 8,900 square feet within the Low Medium '.. Residential District (4-8 dwelling unite Per acre) Under ii Basic Development Standards; and 31 To reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) under 9asic Development Standards. On December n, 1991, +he. Planning Commission contin'aed this item to allow further discussion on the proposed amendments. Attached for your consideration is the previous Staff Reoort and the Resolution of Approval . RECOMMENDATION: After mnsiderinq all public testimony, staff recommends th at the Planning Commission recommend to the Cf ty Council aPProval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment R9-03 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. ally p; tT. .,~ \~ Ara\ er City/Pla Hoer BA:SH:mlg Attachments: Staff. Report (Dated December 11, 1991) Planning Commisa loo Reao lotion of Approval CrafT City Council Ordinance PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 16211 - C*.5. i!OME CORP. December 11, 1991 Page 3 v property. Five floor plans are proposed that range in size from 1,98E to 3,370 square feet. A11 plans are two-story with the exceptien of the smallest floor plan, which is a one-story design. The 1, 9E8 square foot residence is offered with a two-car side-on or a three-car detached garage. All other houses, with the exception of tF.e largest model, are proposed with three-car front- on or side-on garages. The 3,378 square foot rest dente is proposed with a three-car front-on garage only. All house footprints are reversible and a minimum of four elevations per Footprint have been furnished by the architect to meet the Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements for unit variety. over 50 percent of the garages are plotted in a side-cm or detached condition to provide mote in*_erestiny stre etscapee as intended by the ^ctiwanda Specific Plan. In addition to the numbered lots, a 10.57 acre Jettered lot is shown on the south portion of the project site for use as an interim deeenticn basin and future pack site. An interim basin is required to handle excess runoff created 6y this projeM and future projects in the immeaid to area. The future park site has been proposed by the developer to meet the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Pian requirements for a par Y. site in the block bounded by Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda, Miller, and East Avenues. The park issue is discussed in more detail below. Lct sizes (not including the lettered lot) range in size from 7,200 to 16,260 square Eeet with an average lot size of 8, 6E5 square feet. Lots within the areas currently zoned Low-Medium Residential avers qe 9,986 aqua re Eeet an3 lots in the Medium Resl.:~ntial district average E,600 square feet. It should be noted that it is the developer's intention to have the map reviewed and approved as a vesting map. If the Commission does approve this ma o, the vest ino rights will protect the developer trom complying with future changes to the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. All recommended Conditions of Approval in the Resolutions of approval will still have fu 11 force and effect. H. Issues: When analyzing the proposed subdivision map and design review thereof, staff notes several areas of concern for consideration by the Planning Coamissi on. Th_y can be analyzed as follows: Land Use: Ln conjunction with this tentative subdivision map, the applicant is proposing Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 for the purposes cf allowing "conventional" single family detached de ve lopme rt in the Medium Residential zone of the Etiwanda Specific Plan with smaller minimum average lot areas than currently required. In order to accomp lieh the applicant's objective for approving the tentative map as proposed, three specific standards within the Etiwanda 5pecif lr. F tan were idenE.if ied for revision. (Please refer to the staff PLACNING !'OMM ISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14211 - J.S. NUME CORP. December 11, 1991 Yage 2 • D. General Pian Designatiors: Pr o3 ect Site - Low-Medium and Medium Residential, Park, and proposed elementary school North - Low-Medium and Medium Residential South - Medium Residentiai East - Medium Residential, Commercial, and City of Fontana West - Low-Medium and Medium Residential E. Site Characteristics: The 82 acre site is bounded partially by East Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwan da Avenue. Miller Avenue bisects the site in the northern-third o£ the project and the Devore (I-15? Freeway forms the project boundary near the nor ttwest co rnez of the site. Several windrows of Bh:e Gum En ra lyptas trees (many of which have been infested by the Eucalyptus Borer Beetle) exist on Lhe property. Eris tl ng resr deuces fronting Miller Avenue are east and west of the project boundaries. P, 450-foot wide utility easement. is adjacent to and east of a req~vired interim detention basin which is proposed south of the residential lots. The site slopes north to south at roughly 3 percent. The site is void of any structures and contains remnants of a former grape vineyard. BACKGROUND: This project was formally submitted on May 17, 1989. Sol lowing formal submittal, the application was deemed incomplete on Five separate occasions. As a courtesy to the developer, the incomplete application was reviewed by the Grading, Technical, and Design Review Conn it to es in October of 1989, with the provision that the project wcu ld again be reviewed by the Committees once deemed complete. On April 24, 1991, the Planning Conmission granted the applicant's request for an additional 750 days (until the September 25, 1991 Planning Commis sz on meeting) to romp lets tF.e application and receive formal review and recommendations from all the advisory co¢m~ittees and the Pazk and Recreation Conmisaicn. At the rime the project was to be formally reviewed by the advisory committees (the week of September 2-6, 1991), the praj ect application had not yet been deemed complete; tharefore, all the cortw ittees again reviewed the project as a courtesy to the dsveloper during that week. curing the 150 days between the April 24 and September 25, 1991 meetings, the application was never deemed complete by staff. On September 25, 1991, the Planning Co¢m fission denied the project without prejudice because of the income le is status of the project application. This decision was timely appealed to the City Counri l; however, it was accepted as complete (nctober 30, 1991) prior to the appeal hearing; thereby making the appeal request moot. The project was then scheduled for Commission review within 50 days of accepia nce of a complete application, as required by the Subdivision Map Act. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant le propos my to subdivide and conat root a 226-unit single tam il.y detached su bdiv is i.on on the subject PLANNING COMM IS SZ ON STAF'ti REPORT VTT 16211 - J.S. HOME CORP. December 11, 1991 Page 5 the Cortunission concurs that this coedit ion cannot be adequately enforced after approving the Vesting Tentative Map, then the Commission should de nl' Vesting Tentative Tract 14271 on those grounds. Engineering Issues: As noted earlier, this project was denied by the Planning Covmission on September 25, 1991, because the project's drainage report was inadequate. As stated that night, the developer's engineer did submit the report to the City on September 18, '991; however, that did not provide sufficient review time for staff to properly evaluate the report for the September 25 Planning Coamiis aion meeting. Subsequently, Engineering staff reviewed the report and found it sufficiently complete to allow the project review to proceed. After accepting the report as complete, staff received a letter from the Metropolitan Water District (NWD) stating that they objected to the vac of their easement as a maintenance road and as a till slope for the proposed drainage detention basin. Staff feels there are sufficient alternatives avai ].able to resolve this issue in the plan check phase of the project. It appears that the realigned storm drains proposed for the developments will 6e consi dezably more expensive ($4,900,000) then those shown on the City's adopted Master Plan ($3,600,000), an increase of $1,300,000. The con di tiona require that this development absorh the additional cost of approve that the additional cost are justified during the drainage master plan modification process to be completed prior to x'ecordati on of the Ei nal map. The developer has objected to several of the recommended En9i.neering Dlvisi on Conditions of Approval relating Lo street imp rnvements. A lia ring of the recommended co editions and the r eason ir.g supporting them is as f.olLOws: a. Miller Avenue 1) Width (four versus two lanes) - The developer contends that only two lanes are needed. Staff has recommended that it be four lanes. Tee reasoning Eor this recommendation is contained in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 91-01, also on tool ght's agenda. 2) Amount of Improvements - This condition would require that Miller Avenue be constructed full width from Etiwan da Avenue to the project's east boundary which includes some off-site improvements. Staff hoe been requiring full-width streets, which extend off-sl to to a loyical ending point, since the concern foz safety and public convenience was exp teased by the City PLANNING COMMiS SION PTAFF REPORT VTT 14211 - U.S. HJME CORY. Cecember 11, 1991 Pa qe 4 report for Etiwanda Specific Flan Amendment 89-03, which preceded this item, _°or the specific amendment requests and ce fated issues.) The subdivision has beer designed to be in conformance with all of the prcposed amendments. Therefore, if all Facets of the amendments are approved, as recommended by staff, then the issues of non-conformity with current development standards is not a concern. However, if a~ oz all parts of the Spe cif is Plan Amendment are denied, the Planning Conan is Sion must deny this project on the basis of inconsistency with the Etiwanda 5p ec if is Plan development standards. 2. Pz rk Development Issues: Cn Thursday, November 21, 7991, the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed Vesting Tentative Tract 14211 with regards to park dedication obligation. Three options were presented to the Coves fission which included the dedication of parkland, the payment of in-lieu fees, or a combination of both. All three options also included a stipulation that the on-site drainage area being dedicated in fee to the Cit,~ should be reserved for future parkland once the basin is no longer needed for drainage purposes. U.S. Home Corporation representatives were present at Ue meeting to discuss the project with the Commission in detail. After carefully reviewing each of the options, the Commission chose a modified Option 1 for recommendation to City Council. This option includes the dedication of 2.33 acres (3 acres of parkland per 1.000 popalati on `, of unencumbered parkland to the ne rth and contiguous with the 10-6 acres designated Eor drainage purposes on the Tentative Map. In addition, the Cormnission requested that the area being dedicated in fee for drainage purposes shw ld also be reserved for future park pu rpos ea once it is no longer reyu fired for drainage. The Commission also requested that staff work with the Engineering dlvis ion to determine if any of the area currently shown as future dedication for drainage purposes on the Tentative Map is not needed, and thus not dedicated, mold be offered in Eee to meet the park ob li gaci or. in place of the 2.33 unencumbered acres being requested, thus allowing better access from the par ke its to the utility easements fcr Eutu re trail purposes. Please note that the current Vesting Tentative Map proposal does not include the 2.33 acre parcel for park purposes. The reEoz _, staEE has included a condition within the attached Resolution of Approval for the Vesting Tentative Map to show the parkland on the Final Map and any subsequent replotting of lots and reconfiguration of streets for review and approval of the Desi qn Review Committee and, Sf necessary, the Planning ronm fission, prior to recordation of the F1 roal Map• However, if P1.ANN ING COAP1I55 i0N STAFF REPORT VTT 74211 - U.S. NOME CORP. December 11, 1991 Page 7 it should be noted that the purpose of those two courtesy review meetings was to allow the developer an oooortun ity to receive direction from the Design Review Committee, primarily in conjunction witY, the major design issues mentioned by staff. At ^.hese meetings, time did not permit dis cu::si on of other secondary design; issues and design policy issues. Please refer to ExF,ibit "J" for a breakdown of the specific design issues and reconmen dab ons thereof. In the time between the most recent co ux't esy review (September 5, 1991) and the Design Review Committee meeting of November 21, 1991, the applicant did not revise the plans for formal review by the Design Review Committee. On November 21, 1991, tie Committee (TOlstoy, Mel then, Coleman) formally reviewed and forwarded the project to the full Planning Commission with the recommendations listed rn the attached action agenda (see Exhibit "J^~. Th_ Covm ittee noted that the issue of the rigid, grid-pattern subdivision layout could not be conditioned because it meant re deli gnrng the entire tract. Since the November 21, 1991, Deai gn Review Committee meeting, the applicant chose not to revise the project plans. Therefore, staff has conditioned all of the previous Design Ae vi.ew Covm it tee cowments and included them in the Vesting Tentative Tract Map or Design Review Resolutions of Approval for the project, whichever is app Licable. Zf the full Planning Conm,ission fee is that any of the conditions contained in the Resolutions of Approval cannot be addressed following approval of this Vesting Tentative Map (i.e., "grid" strer_t pattern) then the project should be denied on those grounds. G Technical Review Conmittee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on three separate occasions, twice as a courtesy to t:e development team (October 17, 1989, and September 4, 1991) and formally on November 20, 1991. Ht the November 20 mee ring, tha Committee recommended conditions of approval, which have been incorporated into the attached resolutions fox the Commission's conai de ration. D. Grading Comm S. t'cee: The Grading Conmlt tee [e viewed the project on three separate occasions, twice as a rnurteay to the developer, and formally on November 19, 1991. At that meeting, the Grading Committee recommended that the project be forwarded to toe full Planning Commis stun Eor review and action. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the In ir.ial Study hae been coap le ted by the applicant. Staff had comp le tad Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found that although the project could have a si gn rf scant effect un the environment in several areas, including hydrology, traffic, tree removal, public services, and aesthet i.cs, there will not be a si gn iEi cant, of fecC on the PLANNING COMMIS SLON STAFF P.EPO iT VTT 76211 - D.S. HOME CORP. December 11, 1591 Page 6 Council and Planning Commission a couple of years ago. This policy is ref lecte3 in the City Council's adopted Improvement Implementation Policies for the Terra Vista and Victoria Planned Covununities. The developer will he eligible for fez credit and reimbursement for the middle 38 feet of the st rect from the City Transportation nevelopment Fund and rei mbursemert from adjacent development for the remaining off-site improvements. b. Etiwanda Avenue - The condition would require this project to construct the east-half of this street from "A" Street to M+.1 ler Avenue, which includes improvements off-site on the parcel to the north. The reasons for this requirement are similar [o these for Miller Avenue in that this street is the main access route for the development. F1i11-width construction was not required because there are basic existing improvements on the west side of the street. The developer will be eligible for fee credits and reimbursements similar to those available for Millet Avenue. c. Etiwanda/Miller Intersection - This intersection is a part of the Etiwanda/Miller access route to the site. The development has Seen required to reconstruct the east-half of this intersection including sufficient width for left- turn La res and sidewalk in the north parkway. This will require some recons tructiw of the retaining walls under the freeway bridge. The deve Loper has stated he feels this work wi it cos T. S2, OOC 000; however, he has not provided any justification. Staf£ feels !t could crost as lithe as 5200,000. The developer can request a reimbursement agreement to recover a proportionate portion of the cost of the improvements to the bridge retaining wall from £utu ze developments of adjacent property. d. "A" and "AA" Streets - These streets are required to be constructed fu 11-width along the project's bocndaries, which is cons is rent with the current City policy requiring fu 11-width street im_~rovements. The developer will be eligible for half-cost reimbursement for the off-site port i.on from the future development of the adjacent property. Design Issues/Design Ae view Conmittee: As noted in the Background Section of T.h is report, the Desl qn Ae view Comni tt ee reviewed this project (October 19, 1989 and September S, 1991) as a courtesy to the development team. At these meetings, the Convnit tee recommended numerous changes to the site plan and buildf ng elevations (see Ezhi bit "J"1. PLANNING COMMISET ON STAFF REPORT VTT 14211 - U.B. HOME CORP. December 11, 1991 Page 9 CORRESPONDENCE: This ite¢ has been advertised as a public hear log in the inland Va 11ey Daily Bullet ir. newspaper, the projec! has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners wit bin 300 feet of the project site. AECOM4ENDAT ION: BtaEE recommends that Commission receive all public testimony related to the project. If, after receiving public testimony, the Cortvnission concurs with staff that a number of the unresolved issues cannot be adequately conditioned without modifying the entire project and the required Facts for Findings cannot be made, ther, staff would re comae nd that the Commission deny Vesting Tentative Tract 14211, and the Design Review thez eof, through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Den is i. However, if the Commission can support the project with the conditions contained Ln the attached Resolutions of Approval (including the Facts for Findings contained therein), adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respe ly su Brad er city a annex BB:BH: sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "N" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Site utilization Map Vesting Tentative Tract Map Project Phasing Map Detailed Site Plan Typical Conceptual landscape/Wall Plans Conceptual Park Plan in Interim Detention Ba91n Conceptual Goading Plan Floor Plans Building Elevations Dea ign Review Action Agen da, November 21, 1991 meeting Resolution of Denial Eor Vesting Tentative Tract 14211 Resolution of Denial Eor the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract 14211 Resolution of Approval for Vesting Tenta tl ve Tract 16211 with Con dit iorrs Resolution of Approval for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract 14211 with Conditions PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14211 - V.S. HOME CORP. December 11, 1991 Page B environment in this case because of the mitigation measures which have been included as Conditions o' Approval •eithin the attached Resciutions. Theref ors, if after reviewing the proposed mitigation measures specified within the Resolution, the Co:maissi on concurs with staff's findings, then issuance of a mitigated negative declaration would be in order. PACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Coum is sion to approve the project, the following Findings must be made: ,l. Vesti nq Tentd tive Tract Map: 1. The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and 2. The design or improvement of the Tentative Tract is consistent with tiie General Plan and the Etiwanda Bpecif is Plan; and 3. The site is physically suitable Eor the type of development p ropoeed; and 4. The design of the aubdivis ion is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and a-roidable injury to humans and wildlife and their habitat; and 5. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 6. The design o£ the Tentative Tract will rot conflict with any easement required by the public at '_ar ge, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. B. Design Re.•lew 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and pu rpoa es of the district in which the site is loco to d; and 3. That the r, ~cposed tlesi gn is in compliance with each of the a pp iicable provisions of the F.t iwanda Epeclf is Plan; and 4. That the propoe ed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be dot rSmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ~\ ~. 9.y ~p Icli'~. ___,_. ~ j ~~~~ ~ - ~~ ~ W . ~ \t F , T~ 'w,~.,x, e ~~ _. ~'~ • jr I ~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~. ~ ~ .. ~ ~ e ~ 7 I• M..,i t ~ 1 • ~ ~ F f 7 ~+,_ _ JII `Jl.~~ t. '~ ~-- ._.,-~. ~ „ w s .. ", i' ,; r, ,. ,~~ `~, ~ t 1 Q 11! 1 ~ r1e , . r~~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ .-~ ~ ~~~ ._.~ I '',1 ~~ ~ ~ ` :F~:, ~ ~i. i, , < V IF 1, ~ ll 1 ~ 1 l `iF 1 ~ i 1+ ` 1 k1 ' 1 ~1 '+ t ~i.• 1~ .. , ,,,, >~ 1 , ,, ,. _ _ ~ _:. -_ - -- -,- ~'t .. it '?) ~y-` ~[- . ~ i + / s n .. = 1 .~' ~ 6 ~ \1I t i h <~ ! ~ J~ 1 li 1 ` ' 1 l4 3 ~ ' i' ! a ~ `If ~. ~ 1{? 1. ~ 1 1I 1~ ~I .C 1 ~ ~ ~. -- _-__ 1 ~ ~ 41 I r - -• ~ '~ ,... ~~~ ~ 1•' } i ~' ~'t-~~ I' ~, ~: ' it ~~ ~I ~ k ;:~: = I; ~l , ta'I,~i, 1 i .. ~ I I il. ~ ~~ 7' II I ~.I 9 ~ ~~14~ ~_..14 . -.~. ~..:, M N h Ir h ; , -- f~': ~!:! it ~ 2 -T;- 1 ~f, ~I~H' Q ~ _ :.. ~„ 'W ;!} r :~ ;tit; i2 ~~!~ r I *~ ~ q ij M ' ~~ yy ~~~~~C ' +«~ ru ! ! ~ -r+-' .-. .: a,t}.~ ~~ ~:~ = ~. tueinti~ii i'ii' 3i'ii~ ~ ~:1, a..je •j~ e~4 •F is 'Fr•p.j. e.; ~. nj.44i. ~!' ~ ..t '.~. •i•i'r .:. yqr !lei ~ of Hi ihj~`ri• e,'1 ~f i'il: t^;f+'1r i ij~4 i!'f'1\it!}y,'e i• 9 - e! 'j~~le:ji tf+r{. ri 1e~1 f~W71~tiJ nj.d '; l ' ~t ,c: _ jE;~ ~ ''~q•T ~T. 1 ~ v 1 r -~...~e _ ' 1t i ~ . . __ ~. ~1: t t '~'7 r : S &7 Y' s . r: ,.- I r w ~~ , . ~` ~~ ~e 0 1j41 r , r ai''_ r.a _. i~ r9' . _ (- ~; ^~1 ~t ~:;~ !~ ~ / % ~,r,.% " , rY~ ;' '_ i i t ii 1 ~` ~f '~~F~;lq~j 1))- lIU is ijll;l VII 1, ~ 1 ili ljlK~~ e^ I -Ilil ilMl fll ... ii6I1 l,it R,q (1 " f1uuU. !11!!11'1 Iffll~l! f ltti]fl ~~~~~~111111 Ixiii ~i tilf l`il tU^?t:' lu i,'1ti ... ~'iil iru~~jj!i~° ~,:° u.+a nuni.: m~ >t~~l~~">~i~i P~i; ~ o-~~~ii;i~f~t~it~.;~a~ ;1rta U,:~~,0~1„' ':.-xifuf= nrva f..:.u m:~uou ,::uur.~u:ryl~,, 1Oiiil'ii~iii°' '° 4 II•,' :'1ii xl le ni, ai n~_~. r~„1 0~~~,,~I.I J a, ~ ~ ,j i. xi `f 8 ` ~~ ^ ~ ` { ~ rr ~7 . -~ _ ~ ~ ~ 12 _ _ _ ~ +- ~~ f. v - ~~~. _ 4 _5~-L ~ _ t _.]~ ti ~~ F_ 1~ 1' R 1' ~ ;. g •f-. • ~ - ~ ~ ,s -- t, - , , L ., f ~.~` i... ~ ~ _ , aim _ .. A fi':1 !Ai _-..~ ,-. . ~ _.J ,', e . ~~',~ ~ . - ~~ i" -;l' R t T~ _ ~~ ~ ;i . _ ~ ~ ` O i `\ O i V IV AZT` ~" ci'y A'1 .~ L'~_ • ` ~t ~^• e+l L -Z_ _ ,. .. ~. r~ ~ t _ ---~~- .§ f ~li1S~A~.r ~~ t m .~ c .. , a1^'~~ '4 ~4r. ,~Viili ll li i' rAi ftL ~„~`i__i! A_ 'r ~'-- i -_ r ~/ ,. °' rSA; ris" R' ..L~S V'~f"~f(Pi ii :~~f't ~l z ~- 13A15 3 5 Z ' a z 2 {yl~J I -,, , r ~~ », ~ - ~.~..~ ~ ~ ,.,,.,F„~.. ~ ~i i, . ,. - .. _ _ - r> _- _. _ ;~: - ... - - - - _ ~ - J - _ _~:~:. ---.. ~ ~_ _~ _ ` ~, _ _ ~ , - , ~ _ a ; il _- ~ r ~ l _li (t ,-__ ~ _ R .. .- ~Z ~ i i __ { { ~; e .w L 1 - . ~ r ,, ._ .,. ._,~ :~ ~~,~ i ;I ,I _ ~ ~I ~~ :~ ~~ ~. ~ 1~i , ~ ,, ~ it ' I ~ "I ~ ~ _ i I``I i_, ~1+i'o I~ p~ ~~ `.~ ~: ~_~ 0: O: V '< i ^ ~ ~~~ .. _- _.. ~ ~ ~-__-_--_---__-_-.J ._ __- _.r__.._._._.. ~._._ --' ~ i I w~ 1 I r D -4 ~. ', C9 r . .~ ` _ _ 1O i I~` i f OJ/Aa'NMG ~!~YlOpf .. ;,'i .,~ ~ ( It`, x . i ~~~ iii. .~ _~I ~t 1 1 11 ((, , ,. .lF.i•t•. t, ij rare.: ~....a" , 1 1,- ~{ii , ~_-J ~rmL ,,~ .,. .y ~i .~ ` ~ __. I f .J- - J ~ '~- -- ~ ~ r -- I -- 1 ` 'o ' - __ ~ - ~~~ . _ ~ ~ I ~, r it ~ ~ ,~ I, _ l I ~_ Y _~-. I .F .. ~ ~ ~ -,!1 1 Ise ~ _ ., 11 ".' 1 ' _ ~ __' - < I ~~ ~` x ,,5 1 ~_-~ .Y_ --te ~ "~ ~ H _ . r ~. -}41 IV ~ ~ .. ~ _ 1 _ l ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~' I 4 ~ (.~ 1 _ t ~ ~ P- k r I is] i' .1 '~ e ~,_ a .; ~ _ J F : • ~ I I `I. ~~\ ~ 1111 =j. '~ ' '~ -~ P ~ , i R - r~'. . ` ~ it ir<.~. (- ~` ;,.{ _- :; ., ~` ~ I i ` ,~ Z i :Q V, II Y i :i ~ '{]y _.. 1. A - l!. •( '~ ~' i ~ ~ 1 ~ I; i I ~ ~:~ i~ i(t ~ i; i~ { ~( 1 ~ T I it 1. I4 ~1,. i--~T' .> 1 alt ~: r f._ - .,., ~, .~ ~ i ___ - . ___ - ., _ _ - .. z¢a.....g.rs., ~ J~ - __ f ~. .~~`.._ ..x ~.._- ` 3nb '] ~ ~ ~_. . .} ~ t i t 1~ .'~ i ~, 4 4 ZI I ON 1DYtl13M1Y1N31 } ~ i ~ i j ~ ~~;~ E i f ~ € i ~ ~ ~. -~ ~1~if ,,~ . .. O~os~ NYld 3dYp50VYl ~~ 5~', yi al ~~ aNae~ ~vnad3.+q~ ~ rf I y; ~ - ~ - - ~ ~~ ~.~ ~ , -- ~ ~ -~ '-~ -- ., , ~ a __ ,1 " , ff'' n /~ ,...t ;~; a_1,-~,~ _ _ ,1' all , yy ~ k _ 1 _ _ ~ ~ i £ _ ~ t.,, ~ ~ , a _ ' _ ti L. i -_ Y a 11a _~-- ~ce~_~.. ~ . -~ r. ~ : ~ - - ~ °' - -- h x, ,. ` r ~~ '~ 1 __~ _ .. . ~ .. . 3 . I~ ~'_ t I _ - ~ •~ _ If f I ~ 11 ~- ~ ~ t ' '~',':': ?;~. ~ F`~ r. _ ,, . ~ ~ ~ ,: ., . l _x - a : ,~ ~, ~ l `a Y1 ~. ~ I ! _ i ~ ~ ~I ~ I I II I I \ `_ n ~ " __ ~ . ` ; ~ ' 1 ~ ~ - iiiSi?~1U iiiill:iifill .~ iy r li ` ~~~ ~'• - ~ I r ~' Ji - ~ ° _~7~ ' ~ _ 11t ~. -r1t,. ~ •~: ~ D-S ~ XrM LilMOrl ": ..+~aC'~i`i~ r.'.: w:.l I I FI ~ I ~. I I I I ' ~~^ um raruu .nwvwY er:cn.~no ~ , ~ n be an !I~! I I ~ I ~ r wn'r urvi uurlW r III I ! I I I Y 0 I ! ! ¢ i ! ! ,~ s ~ ~ ~ ,~ . '.~ .~~ t ° ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ r ~ a >. a ~ __ _ w ~\\ ~ ; `_ 1 !~ II ~ i ~ ^- ~ :.~ P s, j4~ . S ~~ '~_ < ,, i ' .~ i '~i 6 ._ i ~' ~, ~c ~I ~' ..~ r i r ,~~,.,,~,,,~ ~w.~ Y „9 ~ I Il e ~ ~, I' i 6 c i i ' , ' ce IE~ ~ ~ ~~ i j ~=i ~~ ~~ 7 . ~ ~ ~ -!; i~ ! jf ~~ V ~'n + L° i ~ ~ J ' ' f ; ~ _J C 4b MYTY YY ~~ `llbAti ITOf 1.)b9 v, a~= c~ D 1' ~Y r ~~ ~ ~~~ ,~ ~e•. _~ '~~~~s~~ra~ d, . do ~~ i 1 Np1YtlOaUO~ 3VON 5~ I '~ ~ t13~1 ON 1JYtl13N1ViN31 ~• I• ' i if it d;. ni ,, . I I .w.w• S1N3WlWOW Atl1N3 lVf11d30N00 ~ I S1H°JI3Fi AN l00 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~+ •. '~ ~L_ I ~ 1~ ~t ~~' t ~ J O T, ' ~6 Qc ~o ~ zr b ~ ad ~k - , a ZO F - - -~_.... 4- --- --. _ 133b151b1b3 _-~~~~--. y 3 i ' / , i ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - E ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ i ~ ; - ~Kn E-4 - __ _ __ ~1 I 1 ~ - -`~ ~: pp' ~ _ ~ 'ky S.I ~ P I _. Ip ~ 8 a ~A ...`'a ~ ..- - I: I iL ._ F -~ 1 1 llllll uu 'cur. _ _ (~ ~ ;1 , ^11~t «1 ~ l i e -2~ iG' 1 - L ii ~ lnt iiiiii ~ 3 e i;. ~-isa .7 t .- ,~ { ~~.. ' I~ 3 j c ~ i p ~ --ltTr~ - L = ._ 2i a -~ 1 s r„ Ai~ c - -j~ ~ ~. '~ _` __.I _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~"~ __ ~I II .~ ~~e ~ , i ~_~' ~ ~ I ~ ' ., , '~/ `,- ~~ ..; a ~Y rv ~y _~ ! _ ••V ~ _ ':111111 MI/1/1>f ^ { .. ~.~v ' ~. ' .. Y•' ~ -a •• v . ~ _ r 4 ~_~~) ~ 3 ' ~ ~ - ~ - 1~af- ., ~ f ~ Y ~ ~ _ ~ .. _r.'. J •:j' '~` - • _ ,, ,t _ 1 'i y ~~ II .. .r. . ~ ~' t _ 1. .. 3'.' ~ ~ ~ { ~ _ i ~"' ~ ~ ~ . U a ~~ + I ~ 1j- A. 'I ~^ `l. r1 •' ~ 'F x i ~(' ` I~ _ ~~ ~ > f - , -.. ~• -.. ~ ... ,~ ~ ~~ ~ a s ,, ~ ~ . , .._ I 1" # ~ - ,._. ... ~..,.___~-:-:: .. .ate ...t - -- ------ ~ J- S" ' i t, t ` ~~ l y ~~~ ~ ~' Ali ~ ~ ~: ,r_ F ,) , ~: ~~~ ~~ _ c 7; +=-a+` -- --~ - ~ r w.::~.-~ -- r _ - '' __ ° ~ -~ ~; ~: ~~: ~: 4 O~ V E r ~ w p 1 .. ,,,,, ... ~ a - •r _ y . _ __ ~ ~ ~ ~'i - ~ -~ .~ -' ~ V ~ ', 1 ' ~ - - ~ i ~ c , - _ j~ - i ~ i , ; ^ ~ , I s I = S I a ~~ ~ . + / ` i i ~ ~.7 `sue. ~ :. _ 1 ~ ~ o s~ .sass. gwr~w~ .n.....o. ~ ~.r f G-y i _ + 1 -- { .ti i _ _ -_ ~..---.- - ---- s ~ . Ot . 1 -~ , ... ~i;: ii:: is i,i~ ~ .. ~ KI draa:::~:::,. ~ ~ 1 . -.15::,1 ~- ~ - _ .. 1 .~r -_ . ~ ' ... .: ~ ~ i .. ~.~; i ~u, , .~ 1. f~.-__-..ICI ~ .. ~,~ ,' ~ d f •~ _ .. ~'. .: ._ . .~ .~ . -a 44 u 4 ~ 1 V 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~i" a~~r,~ _ i \\ 1 (tlf ~I 1 ~ fLyyJ.~~ 1\ I..~l~l' 1 .Ir 1..-' ~ ~ y_-~ a ~` Y .~1 C ~' 1 -'~~~ ~x ,.,,I;;tPo:a t.attlitiliill ~ ~ 4 ~ r~ ,f a Vt{N:I tI P:r i~ay~ ~ - ~I y ........... 1 ' t1 ' ~ J/ ~1 ~ •1 Op,ilill,~l~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~, ~~ \...,\,.11 ~ ~ ~ c .+, v.` '., a_.~. .r- ~rh - ~r-S' 'dF.gD 'A30 VONVMIl3 i ~!^-~-- ~~ ~i~i: ~~ ~_~ I~ iii ~ ,~ ~ ~; ~ i~ ~ r~ E I 1 O I1 ~ i ~ \ E t s ~~ ~ ~ ' k xn,b,t 'dNO~'A30 YONYMLL3 _' ~ H 0 'dtl0~ 'A3~ MOM/MLL3 gLL H F a~ q 1 - ~ 'dlpJ 'A30 tlON1INJl3 ~~ ~: 111 I ~ ~ ~ a - ~ i i ~ ~ : 1 ~H m i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ E I ~ _! ~ / 6 E 3 ~ 9 ~ ~ t _ o ~ : ~ ~+-~r ._ r 'dtl0~'~30 VUNtlNVl3 `~J ; n i 1~l 4 r.1L+~ _ Oy a~~ ~ N ~- ~ . I~ ~ ' ~ - N _ ~ a§ ~ ~ ~ i~~ 3 E ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~ ~ E yS 9 `. _ 3 v ' ~ C ~ ~ r _~__. _. j ~ ee ' ~_- ___ _r ~,~,.L.` r, N-- S ' a ~d~ ~~~ ~~~3 3 C i ! s$ ~i I~ erg-- ~; ;' ~' ~ a ~ ~N N ~~ _' Sb d 3 ----- I g I ' y. r+ ~~,~ LL ~ ,y, y~ .; d ~ '~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - i~ ~ ~ r--, ~ ~$~ ~ Ey _ ~ ~u ~ ~ 9 ' ' -TZ~-- ~ 9 I ~~ _ - ~; z __ - 3 ~~ _.. - _:~ - „7 __.. -.____ _ ~ J_ _ ~ -~ a _~. ~.f i;'", ~ -- - - -- - - ~- - - f+- 7 F ~ _ _ g 'dNO~ 'A3p ypNYlJJl3 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ L. _ ` ~'~ ,~ I ; _ ~ ' r i >~~-- ~ ~ ._. E ~ v 'y~+ I - i 9 a~ ~~~~ }+--- i - ,dam ~ ~J13 ~~.~1 i 1 ~ ~ e a ~.. r'~ G ~; ~~~ ,., y ^ I E I t I ~ ,_ _. ~ --~- ~ 9 C N i ~° I ~ ~ i _ ^ N ~ ~ ~ __ _ :~ ~ i r ~ ~ ; . ~= i i ~ s - \ ~, \ $ ~ ~ I~ i ~ ~ - ! ~d ~; ° -- .~ .~ ~ ---__-_~ _,o -~ I' ',~ ~ P: i ten,.. ---r f~ i I ~J ~N I ~ it r ~ -. _.. ~- III I' ~ ' i Y .3 b` i _ rt _~ ' ~ ^ i - ~ ~ ~` s ~ ~ I ~_ ~ J ~ Pte. ,/ ~ ~ I -.~ r _~ i Q 6~ s~rl 4 W6 ~ Q Q. 33 ~ 3 _ O in ~ _= i ~ b I II {.'~~ ~^ ~~ ~A~ ~~~ l~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~~ pp M ~t~ %L ~ 1I ~~ I ~ h ~ qq{x x « ~~ {{ ~ NF t .=^, ~~~ ~ T I• a ~~ ' ` - - + ~' ~ - _ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I 9 ~ ~ s ~ 6 i -' 'Cc I .~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ -~~ C : , ` ~ ~B ~ ~ ,- ;- N-~a ,~~i _ _ ~ •daoo 'naa vorniµua ••~ ' ~' ~ _ f~ r ~ LL ~ ~ ~ i _ Q ~ N :/'4 n N YY ~ _ I _ I I ~li rs i ~, L ~ _ ~ ~ -. _ ~ ,G ~ ~, ~3 ~ ~ ...~ I ;~ ~" ~~ ~ , ~ I I ~ 4-~ ,. _ _ _ ~ •aao~ ~,~, vanMUa •, ' ~ ~~ ~ i € ~ ,~ ~ ~ r~ ~y, ~ ~ LL , ,. . "l ~( ~n v i A r 1 ----~ ~~ E ~ I E S -- ~ ~ I ~ i O I ~ 3 -- ~ o ~~ -~ ~-- + t - fi 's O ~ f ~a{ ~ i ~ _ y __. f__ I ~ I 33 ~~ O ' ~. ^ ~ ~ / 'dtl09'A30 V@7VMLL3 ~~) ~ I ~ ~ 1 LL I b~ H i ~ ~ e~ ~ I I ,1~~ C J 'dtl0~'A3O YONYMLL3 ~~) ~ ,~ .~ ~ ~ ~ 1 r F LL ~~n ~~ e ~ _ I --~ I ~~~ ~~ I @ ---- ~ I ~ ~ --t ~ ~ ~0 3 ~_ ; ~. ~ _ I _..,.F s ~ ~~. ~,, -. r - -i ~ '~'A30 YOiYW13 `~~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ 1 r~ A _~ ,-«~. -- ..~ ~ ~ ~ . , i. ~ ! ~~ _ 1~ _1 4 ~ . G. -1 auoo naa vioNVMUa .) :j ~ i ° V'' ~i ~~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~, _-- ~ -- ~-~" ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 j ~• 1 d _'----t~a '~=__ "~ ~ 1~~'s ~ _. ~~~ ~ ..;- ~ :_ .. o ~ i ~i ~ _ ~ 'dtl00'~30 VONVM113 ~1 ~'~ '. ~'~ ~'~ ~ 5 " I,'...-. ~ Y : 1 i ?~ .l:~bF~yj _ u~. .,Y i~ r i ~ /^~ 1 4 ~' ' ~ ~ ' I ..~".~' ~ ~,.. \ '. `\\ i ... Y ~~ ~~'il , i ,~ ~N II® ~4 I .. Y_d 1 ~r L "~ ~ T -3 ,a l i ~ _ 'd!!C'J 'A3Q VOtJyMi1-3 ~~) '~ , 9 ~ c ~ ~~ I ~ : 1 ~ 3 ~ ~ ti 4 LL ~ I. I W S ~~ ~~ ~ ~m r~/' I ~ '~ r III ~ m ! ~ r, ~' ~I~) ~ a ~ !. ~, ~ ~ V ~~ p~ i~~ ~,~ ~ F i' 3F 3i ;_ I '= f Iii ~, ~'i~j~! ~` i ~~ II f- ~:: ~ ~ i - i i . a L,, f.' : ~~ . ~ , \ ¢~t! -.. ~ _ _ ._ - _ ~ ~f __ '. ~I _~ ,, -_ 'I i _ _ ~ ' 4 ai - I 1 ~~ ~ " I irsy ti ~I - - ' ~-y :,... ;dtl00~'A30 b~NtlM113 ~ ~, '~, I '~a¢ w~ m -~~ 4 M i _ ~dtl0~'A3a VON'C MI13 ,~) ~~~ ~~~,a I ~~~ ~ ~ m i 7 t ~ ~O N I m it i ~~ ~, l!~ I ,~ `i _.. I I 1' ~~ ~r ~' } i ~ ~ h ~~ .I w ~ ® ~. I ~ •" Iy (S L J J ~. ~ r? _ ~~ _ ~ 'dtl0~'A30 VONVMIl3 ~J ~ I ' ~ ~ _ , ~ J~ ~' ~ W _~f j ~s ~ O y 2~ 2 ~ Wa` "~ _ tit > N'- ~~''•~ ~ I t r Z~ ~ . ' Z Ki 4 ~ a ~. I ~ „r ~t~ } , ¢ . `zh..°A„ ~... ~' 1~ ~. h, ,. 1 -_ ~ •daoo •naa raNVMUa ,• ~) I - "'~ ~, y ~ 1 ; i i e l ~ / f ~~ N N •~:~~~- 0 ~~ - 0 r ~- ~_ { 8 _ _ t ~ _ f 1 ...; -'*< r '' lu ' mfr ~ ~ ~_~~. 'dF10~ 1134 VaNYM113 ~~) ._ _ _ ~ I I :® ~ +'~ ~a ti~ WN y ~~ - /d i3 ~Y \ i~~3R U s ~ _ ; 'd1i00 'A34 V4NVMIl3 s) ~ ~ ~ °~ .i. - - ~~I ~ r ~ i 1 _~ j ~ _ ~ ~~~ ~N 1 f I ~''' •~~' ~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ ~~~~ ~ 3 ~~ ~ ~! B SIR B ~y a~ I y ~ f II ~ f: N 1 Y I ~~ ~ , O ~ 1 3 ~, I~ u ;~ ~, ~ .: ~ -!3 ~ i a -~ a ~N N ' ~} 9~~R _i n ~ ~ -~N r~ ~~~ „~~ r.".T L~:`'+i. { I ~' 'dM07'A3G VONtlMLL3 y K N m N GX, 'dtlOJ 'A30 ~UNVMIl3 ~~ ~ i n~ N~ 1' ~~ ~ ~T~ ~l ii 'ill m 'dtl00 'A3a tlONVM113 e1 ~~ j~ I i - i lY ? 7 ~~8 ~ -. r -~;. I 3 I~ ~~ ~ ~ ,; -- _ ... _:.. ~_ ,; I ., =~ _ ~: ~ ,~-., r . i....~ ~.,:, .; ~~-. Erg ~ ~ ° ~ -~q , ~~ I;~ ~'.i 'd F10~ 'A3~ tlONVMi13 EFL !~," T -~o' ~~~ . Q i 'dtl09 'A30 YUNYMII3 1' E~h , b,~ ".~-~ _ _ 'dtl0~ 'A3tl VONYN.113 .~J I ~ ~ N i 1 ~ F i ~ % { y - u ~ ~'}r.. ~ ~ n /5 ~ N ~~ 1 r r r~ I ' ~ ~ ~ r 1 .~ .+ ® L7~, u .. - N J - _ L J ® _ _ a o .~ - T ® ~ .i 1 'd$00 '~30 tlQhVMil3 ~..~) _~, ~ I I _~ a SC 8 ~ j ~~ ~~ I~ ~1 I ~ I~ i2 ~ II, i~ ~ ! ~I~l it ~I ,i ^ 1 it II ~~~~ I ' I /'..,- lJ i :£ i I~1 ~, 4,' ~, I / y l N e a N l 3 1 ~i~8 9~1e .61 'da0~'A30 tldN`vMLL3 ~~J I ~ ~, j ''i ® I I m #- ~~ =A ;~ ~ ~N Q WN ~ i '~~ ~.s ~73S3 I3{ ~ 4~~~ (.~ n :n J -- w e Y .~ i ~~ ~~ . , ~F ',...~_. ~ -__,-- .-' = _ -.~ ~r:, -- 1. i C` ~ '' ~ ~ J ~, ~ ~ ~~ ;" . >~~~- , ~ _J -- " - - 'QA `~ ' . . f'/ . I ~ l~ ~ ~ ' ~S. I ~~ _ J - 1 F~ ;dF~OJ ;A3Q VONtlM113 r.~) - ~~i ti ~... ~ ~ ~Y~ ' .. _.. ` ~eao~ •naa varroMUe N u 'dtlOJ 'A34 tlONdMil3 ~~) ::'~ ~ ~ ~. I I I ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ N a m N CR ~, ~ ~ -~- ., z_ ~ _-~I 'dNOD 'A3t1 tlONYM113 .~) I j I ., I ~ ~.i'; ~ N A N u +~=_ . ,;~.. ~g •~;nY ~~ '~ '~"4~ a~ ~ // ~~ ~. ~ _3 ~ L F.., C ,T m"-1 ~~ =~ 'dtlOD 'A30 V~NVld113 ~J ~ _ m n 11ii ~ i 1^ F LL ~ dN ~Ml ~~ ®~~ ~ ,} a; _ _. a ~ R~. e ~~ :_~ .~-~. -Y_ .~~; -~ . . L ~~.~ ~. _, ~~ ®~ ~f ~. n '3+~ O ~~ ~`-. ~~' I. }^ ~,, -:. ~- .~ •aaoa •n~a ~I ... ', Cry-:.b.-~ ' 2-3`, ~t ~f n ~, ~I 'dHO~'A30 VQNVMII3 ~~J i ~ m .. _ . __ ... - ~ _ t ~ II ~ i• 1 .. ~ "1 1 i i --• s ``~ II ~~ i i Gx~,y,a ,, z-38„ 'dtlOJ 'A34 VaNVMLL3 • i e 1 C { 7~ j`~• !i 4 ~'~ ~N nn GF~„b.~ „Z 39,E '^.~ 'dHOO 'A30 VQNVMIl3 ~. I A a ~ ~ N !7 t £}f r~ F s ~ I ;~ i I __ .....L i3 sal: I ~~~,r~ " z-yo~' ~ •~ a '~ ~` a a{ n ,~~~! c:.; 'dtlOJ 'A30 tlONYMil3 ~~) I ~ ~ 1 i 1' y ~ W ~ y Q l ~ 'I i t ~W ` ~ 7 t I® t yt y1 $t i Q 1 i -- ~ ~id". ~~ ~ ~,. S 4'' ,Z,~; I~I y f iB * ^~ ~ I ^° . ,- O ._ ~ ~ ~o r. ® ^c r l~ 9 y I ?I 'd!!00 'A34 VdNVM113 ~r ~J~ '~. '. ~ ~ ~: ~ I I "s~ e t i 1~ ~I~ 4 I ~ ~• . 'i. 1 I \ I I 1 ` I ~ I I III 1 f,~~ ~I 'dH00 'A30 VCNtlM113 ~~~J~~_ I I ~ I 15, e :u ~~ } ~I t l ~ I~. ~}. ,~ i ~« EI~~ ~ •~•~~ 3 ~~ ~ yT~~ll J, . ~ +~.. .: .. gl . a. _ 'dtlOD 'A3O YGNYM113 .~1 ' i ~,_ ~ e i ~CN _ ; A W Q ~___ ~' ~~ +~ ~ ~~ -- 8 ' o ~~. I II C1Q~~ r~ ' '~~. ~ ~ B; ~ ~~,, ~,-, . ,. ~,, ,, n 'dd0~ 'A3Q tlQJtlM1J3 .~ ' ~ ~ ii j~ O w a~. ._~. 3 •aaoo •naa oaN:n~~.ia _~ ~ ~' ~ I :~ e Om P') ~^ Ex ~ t •I~ 9 n 0 _ '~ 'daoo'nae uoN~rv~ ,~, ~~ ,< -- I it ~ 1 :~ ~ 0 J B ~. t t j 2 7 1 .. ' ~ ~ 't ~'• .._ I { ;! i ~ s~~:, g !!! ~~ ~~ .., . j t ~1 ~ ~~ ' 6 A t .. S-~° .. r^ 'd800 'A3Qtl4NL'M:i3 ,~) ~ ~ i ~ I I' ~ P i I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ > aD ~n _ r~ i r "' ~' ~ j i / r f ~: C~ i^, - -.. f 'dtl09 'A3G tl4NtlMLL3 ~.~1 .L3-411-~ ~- ~_~~. n =i.. DEBIGN REVIEN COM18NT5 6:30 - 7:00 Steve R. November 21, 1997 'e ENVIAONIefNTAL ASS633lgNT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACE 16211 - D S EOlRS - A propwad tentative LraCt mp artd deal9n zevier for the development of 226 single family lots an 81.2 scree of land within the Etivanda Specific Plan Sn rite Medium end Lor-Medium ReslMatial dewlopNnt districts (8-/4 drellinq unlb per acre, respectively), located on iha east side of etirande Aomue south of the Dewre Psesray and rear of Bast Avenue - APN: 227-231-01, 09, 12, 16, end 327 227-191-15, 227-181- 241 and 227-261-11. Related Piles Etiranda 8pscific Plan Amend•ent 89- 03. Abstract. The purpou of tonight's mestinq is to ellor the dswlopaemt tsu the opportunity to zecelw foraal dlrectlm fro, tes Cov•ittem. an Mo previous occasions, eha protect ram given •coutteey nvler• by tae co~ittw prior !o the appllcetlm .. belsq deemed cospleu by staff (October 17, 1989 and September S, 1991). 81nee tae moat recant caurtery revier, tae project hu been deemed Coapleu Dy staft. Plea.. mote teas pLr. ream ea:t romtad is ria.Os~ltw..Mmia:a~ tar this pwiacer the pLr m >» :mvlmmmd st ehta rs-Smg arm idsatieal to tears rsvlaosd at the coat rmaest oaartasy rarlw r! e•Pts~sr S, 1991. Aa with previous uetings, tM dlscwslon tonight ahauld focus primarily on the orator daeiga ismues. If time psrt.ita, thm say Nemdary design and policy isaua of qusstim map W discussed. ,plmsse refer to the aetached Design Rsvier Cow;tttl ActlOa ~gseda• ooYents frog the 9apumber 5, 1991 ustie9 tO prepare !os this agenda itu. DNim Wier CO~SLtM hotlmt .• Members Presents Peter Tolstoy, JoM Malchei, Dsa Coleus Staff Planner: slew Hayes TTe Coemuetss rscOSasnded tryst tee protect W lorrarGd to Ne full Planning CoYissiaa riN tae reuiainq uaruolvsd issue end/or poundal conditions of approval u 'tnl~ow: , 1. TM eiu plea should bs rsdasigaed to avid tM 'grid" pastern proposed throughout the protect. of priory coacssn wu Ns area south of Nillsr Aveaus. EXI-fl/~II ~~J-I~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS TT 16217 - U.E. HONES NOVEt~ER 21, 1991 Page 2 2. Cul-de-sac streets ^D", "K" and "M" should be shortened Sn length to allow lots at the ands of the cul-da-sate io "fas', thereby awiding side/rear yard telatlonahipe batvsen lots. Any other lots which side-on the rear of other loU shoo ld be redesigned. 1Te Committee should review these modificetlona prior to recordation oL the final mnp. 3. The grading plan should be revised to De more aenaitive to Ne natural grade in areas where rear and aide yards incorporate large retaining calla in wmbinaiion with etaep elopes. Staff should review the areas of concern prior to isauanoe of any grading permits. d. In order to address the Comittee's concern of simileiity of form of the aide and rear of the proposed hemp, atreeGCape plans of the project as assn from Miller and Btivende Avenues should be provided for further review of the Cooittea. 5. The maeonite aiding should Da wrapped antltely aromd ell of the proposed units. Also, the ealseted bass clamant (rook or brick, a• applicable; should be continued to a logical point on eacA residence (return wall, chimney) ae Lo not appear a• a "tacked-an" element. 6. The design of the sound attenuation wall nlong the Dewre Preeway should De reviewed by the Design Revlev Committee, prior to Sesuance of any permits or recordation of the final map, wnichevar occurs first. 7. The Millar Avenue and •A" arrest wells should be radeelgned to add more intareet to Lhe atrutacape by varying the wall tetbsek with ernnsitions, providing more subetantlel pilasters (2{-inches square) and decorative copping, to the entiafaetion of the Co®ittee. B. Mora attention to architectural detailing (i.e., variety of garage door daelgn, ahuttete, louvers, material ute, etc.) should be Sncorporated Snto the Wilding elavatione. The epaci[ic modifications should be revlewad by the Design Raviaw Comittee, prior to Seeuanca of building permits. 9. The secondary entry monument should be radaeignad W prwlde a landscape eras 6etwaan the sidewalk end Ne sign walls. Also, a cap enou ld bf prwldad on the Gall end the pilaeten that ie aesthetically mnaletent alth the monument design. EX H 1 ~ rr ~J -a •, DESIGN kEVIEr COMMENTS TT 16211 - D.S. MDME.9 NOVEMEBR 21, 1991 Page 3 70. The uea of decorative hardecepe mterial• within ell driveways should be provided for further review of the Comities, prior to isauanee of building persita. it. 1Mo-story hoses should be avoided m all turner lots, particularly w those adjeeent to the petisater Kreab. 11ny replotting o[ unite ahould be reviared by Cha Dmign Review Comittm, prior to the Saeuanca of any pezsita. 12. Romeo facing perlmter streets and SnteriOZ etrNCa ahould be oriented eo that the flat wall (nm-aetry or garage aide) dose not face the street. all aide and rear •bvatlme along thus ettuL ahould elw b• eoWtentially upgraded rith additional aiding and roof, facia, and rafter deUiling, to the mtisfaction of the Desige Reoier CosalttN. 13. a miniw 4-Snch up ehmld M uaed.m the, pariseter w1U. TM atone colusna ahould elw W upgraded Ls deelp by extwdiaq the beymd rite roll height. A atme+ sap slsll.ac : m the wiry smuswtatim ra1L ahmid b uttllsM. _ ~ ~ -, ... , 16. The periseter call along ltirwda•~•AVww edomld•~ W kept vieaally open Mere oul-da-aac streets aide mw 1!. rtmght Srm lsncdng ahould be utilized 1f the aeouatieal study peralU St. Paved pedeeeriw walks ahmld b• prwidW to the.ltlrwda aidewlk. The pad elevations. along 6tirande avwae ehwiA be- kep!• u for a• possible. 15. Siding and additimal daGilinq ahoaid ba: uatl wre eatenaivalp m all side and tear eleoationa. Adddiieml upgrading of all •treet facing .alewatloma Sncludlnq aiding and Land hmrda m the aecwd-atary o! ire-story unite and additional roof, lascia, end miter datailJigp, ehonl6 be raoiewd and approved bT. the Design Revier Coa~ittN, prior to the lawwce of building pealb. 16. porehea,shauld be expanded in sire [or wet oL the hoses. The porohp shmld M exiwdM Sn length almq garages oe living area. 17. Chiamey deGllinq ahould M' nviaed w that iLe,wtire chimuy Se constructed of atone or brick. ._, 1B. Deelgn altarnaLlvm m the side eUvalim as plan 3778 should be explored for fustber caviar o! the Co~ittm. additimal atone work ru recosMyGd fot the frmt elwatim o[ DLa 3236. 19. galls shwid Grslnab at lust S tnt behind •11 aldwalka or at ^1de yard, pturn fweing locatima. r Ex N1~317 %- 3 „ DESIGN REPIE'.i CONNENTS 1T 14211 - N.$. ROME$ NOVB!lBSR 21, 1991 Page d 20. A future stub street comectiw should G studied RY the Development teem to insure future access for the paicala nor zoned "LM' to the went. 21. Additionnl lots should have a larger (10-12-foot) aide yard aetRack w the garage aides to allow !or vahiwlar acceN to the rear yard. These epeeitic zevlslws should M nvlawed by the Oentgn Review Cos~lttee, prior to the Sesuanw of any persits. 22. A greater variety of front yard setbacb shwld G provided to the aetiafectiw of the Design Wvier Cov.ittN. 23. Rear and side elevations of unit axpwed to perimeter streets nhwld Raw varied rw! designs and deta111sq to provide ~^ pleasant atraatseape vier and a high design gwliiy to~all elevation to Lhs setistactiw of Ne Co~lttee. 2a. Ploor pleas ritR 2-wz garage end bows rooms and/or offset LRird gersga door spew shwld be utilised to mitigaG tlr ccecern of garages doallnating Ue strwtscape. 25. P1eld stone shwld bs natlw rock. Other forms of sLOM uy W manufactured products. 26. A neutral color should b selected for all side yard return walls for reviar by the Cc~ittae. 27. Acwnt nturala (l.e., rock, Drick) should M utilized to • greeter extent an all side and rar elevation to tM satlsfectiw of the Design Review Cossd.tGe. 28. A landscape palette should M sslected that L sensitive to sicroclimatic conditions, rill not crash uintmmanw smd safety hazards. start shwld revive the speeific lasdswps design In ewiunctiw riN LM ;eriseape Osdieaaw, prior to tM Suuenw of any psrmtts. E,r~r~r~~'-~" Motion: Moved by chitiea, eecoaded by Me1cMr, unanimously carried, to adopt the Minutes of December 17, 1991, as amended. ~ . • . . CONSENT CALENDAR A. HNVIAONlRNTAL A8868BMENT AND CONDITIONAL 036 PERMIT 91-30 - SxaLi OIL - Ruolutlon of denial of a ragout to utabliah • qu atat ion, mint-metier, and car wash on a 1.31 acre parcel la the Medium NedMnttal designation, (8-1{ dwelling unite pet acn) o! tM Terra Vista Planned CommunLty, located at the wuthwee! corner of cue Line Road and Rochester Aveau - APN: 227-151-17. (COntinuW from January 8, 199].) x .e,.uwwumxr. ~aaranweaT arm ta•>•varna axrZPLC PLa!! A_w<!DMS11T 89-03 - tl. S, ,HONE CORP(IAATZOII - Aaaolution of denial of a request to amend certain development atudarde within the Etiwanda Bpeei!!e Plu as described below: 1) To allow e1ngU family detached residenllal developani within the Medium Reaiuatial District (8-1{ dwelling units Pez acre) utili:inq Basic Development 9tudatda~ and ]) To reduce the minimum average lot else tram 10,OOG square feet to 8,900 square feet within tM I.ow Medium WeidentLal DiatriM ({-8 dwelling uaiie qs acre) urMet 6uic Developrmt Blandarda) sae 3) To reduce !M mieimnm average lot •Lse from. 16,,000 equate feet to 8,500 equan [set wi[bin tM Nedium Reaidmtial District (e-1{ dwelling uaiie per acre) under Basic OeveloprM Btudarda. (Continued from January 8, 1992.) C, xIM[ axxaxslON [OA TIIITATIVS TRACT 13835 - xO1RBTt71D - A requut !or a time extuelon for a roidutial avbdivielon of 78 tingle [oily lots on 25 scree of land in LM Low Maidential District (1-{ dwelling unite per acre) located at tM nortMUt corner of xigbland and Rochester - APN: 225-152-01 through 01 ud 18. D. TIME EZTBNBIOM fCR TfM[ATZVM TRACT 1{055 - I/ODEM CORe0?~SId1 - A requut for a time exeenaloa for • 3-lot sudlirieloa and design review of 115 condominium unite on 10.27 acres o! led in tM Medium Raaidantlal District (8-1{ dwelling units per acre), located twrtb of Arrow xlghway and east of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-201-3Z ud 12. Itmo A was pulled [or diwuuion. Notion: Moved by Chitin, uconded by Va11etN, to adopt items B, C, and D of the Convent Calendar. A. PN9IAONMENTiL A9BBBBMSMT A_M9 CONDITIONAL tl8B PBIIMIT 91-20 chairman McNiel invited public cadent. P Lnninq CommLelon Minute -2- Juuary 22, 1992 ira./lara. SM fal! that plaeead ce~mLti// wLih Boero.n.e•/ AaaoelattoN veule 1Nd to hott4 naletal/ad aed pr• arath/tlcally ylwlaq yrolaeta. kt. uooeil ..aa/.rLNd en. /ate ehougeta of cM wrbhop aed alt chat tNgtnattw will a a koy io rol.Leq ch. t/Na/ /aetioe/d to tea wekahop. Chatrsan McNLal alt chat th/to ahoule a eo suah W aeewsaq/ aaaallos houaN give hla pra.iwa atpasLNta oe LM CeaWalw vhN tM City woad Lot largai hwNa and CLNt/d l ntnlau~ tMLOa11Ca /1N r/yelia/aet. CovLrrioeas val1/t!/ ea/eacad )at naln coeo.tn.~ 1) tlartawr lot ce.atagN rhwld W KudLaM aed peaalbly saduew~ a/d ]) a /N/it1N laed oN trawielw ahwld W pteoldad D/toNn CIN atfaetad araaa and tM bt• tsadttteeal retwaeda ea.aloprnta north el MN L1N Ibad. Mt. BayN pale aua~/r1Nd tM aalle Oo•t/.Sae owNte/ and aakad tM Co~iNLan to chink ahwt tM aoK nppsepeiah tyy/ o! daaoloPant toe tM MWlra and Low-Nrdlu/ aoea/ to itlwanda and da.oiopleq Kahdaeda to lurthar Ncourago thia eypa o! da./lopaNt. tM riNtlaq Wjoatn/d K 11~If p.~. M/paettully aahnt.ttaal, ~~t~R/ Srad tailor tacmary Plannlnq Ce~laalod Mleeta/ -i- Ja/nary 16, 1991 w [M! ear davaloprn! caalnq in would not pasgturta tM aM aaid a lot o[ CM nor saaidantlal prolacta era contlnusaq pa[tarna and tM aW typaa Of ttNa. // ar. col tdt a field trip with eM NlohNnp rtat! veuld lieial to allot Nion of tM proDlaN. ra aaid teat in ril6 tM Nlnewanea t in tar area M Na eonprnad aaout, M plaaaad to tin aut that the nrinNLY elate rN already DO top tM ptoDlaN and baginninq io put D wlutiona. cce.iaaion/r vallrtta ad aM would iLM to of tM tlald trip. Chairran MCelal volmt Otto ICroutil, Deputy Clty P1 b that Ce~iNloNea TOLeey and Malehar New on tM irN Praaarva O[dlnawa aueee~lttN. N atatad eM auDeaa~lteN had Nkad aeatt at apwltia plartieq drtaila and atandarda ea aN how they M M auggaatad tMt 1! CM Cea~iaaLDNSa MantW LO NM apaail CLOD{ N l rawlt OL CM field erlp, parMpa tM Pnaazvae etN eorla M uaae co leeward tea swa~andat to City Cornell. Coa~lNloaaz Tolrt emeaarad W qo N tM ! trip. N auggNtW teat each year bateta !~. Naaor, ~alasaaaaN agar paetiorlas rttantloa to tM pruning w ehat eM rlyd aerld ear tar ebtorgh ebN. b thought Chia apaelally LpereNt durlnq the Beat f yaNa of growth until tM ryatr aed tM teualr rtara !e tea point LM tsraa eN ritMtaN wlnd. N arggaalW tAL p1N W aassiad ore tM windy area Nat of anaua. IC w M oenNnwa o! tM Cea~laalea that CaWaloNea Vallat Telatoy wu taM • tiald etip wLtb tM aalhtananp atat! and report to tM ~ • a TM HaMLq Ca~1N1aa raeaaaW tta~ lOr~O pa.. to 30re0 p.~. • ... . M. AN aTIOma aaacrne! teu ar u. a. roar tamazzs A tagraat t0 aaoad alttaln daraloparat alandaeda rltbla tM etiranda epwltle r1N N daaatlead e.larr 1) To altar alDgla tanilp datwbad rNidantlal darrleprnt within cha 1Md1N lraaldaptial D1rtHat (e•la dralliap ualta pat wsr) utili:inq rule Da+rlep~NC itandazMr aad ]1 So sedan tba ~lnlaar a~araga la: a1N lea. 10.000 aquaN tart eo e,t00 agaap last rllbia tIN Law Iladl~ eauldaatial Dlatrict ~~-8 drallLq unlta pre wNl uMas eaala OaPalop~aat etandardat aM 71 To radon tM alnlar awtaga lot a1N !ss 10,000 aquaN tut to e,soo aquas tare rltbta eM Madiua eNldNetal Dlatrlet ~a-1{ dwallin0 un1N pre NN) under rota Dawlep~Nt etaaeaeda. iNt! rrewNMr Saaraaaa O! a INgativa DNlatatlar. M1atW ti1a~ eavieerrantal AaNawNt and V~atinq tNGtiq tent 1~]ll.~, (Continued lro~ Oacaabat 17r lfel.) flannlnq Coa~taaion Mlnutaa -Ia- January 8, 1992 ,.... Tha Carilaion rwaaaad fro 3035 p.a. to 10,30 p.a. . • . . iTZ A SPlCZlI D-~~ - Dlacutalon OL Madlue a~W yaw-Madlva dwaloprnt atanaaeda in the ttiwaaea specific Plan. stew wayaa, aaweiate Planner, praawtad a 6riat owtvlwr aurarl:inq previous aaetinga regarding tM related appllCation propoaW by O. a. sera. Coriaeioner To1KOy poaW tM tollowinq queKione~ 1) aheuld tM areas under eonalderation M de1Kw lroe tM silvaada apwitie Plan erN7j and 3) what are LM apwltic wjwtlr ter davelopewt la tM atfeetW arert CMitsan kcsiel thwght Clot tM •deiviag !om• et the tliwaada apeeifla plea L tM area wrtk o[ ear Llr bad, Cosiaaiort Tolatey Celt !ba! tM err south o[ ear Lis wr laaludW Sn tM apwitie plan beeauN of lta link with •old stlwMa. Otto troutll, Deputy City !lease, Kated that Lea ttiwaada sprltio Plan la intwded to protect the eeparKe ldwtity et ttlweda theagh LM ur of paawe, entry etaeeaente, ewk sorbs, Ke. M abeervad tMt the err week et tM Devera -rrway la now dlawntiwoue and unrelated W !M Mlwee of teiw.nda elnw tM traawy aKe u • aaeueal Mttee. Ce~ieaiorr VallKte neazkW that the davelep~wt KaMaMa ahwld M aWdled alorly to eeeure tMt denaitiea do not beooar !ewer aieply by peovidLq woh larger wraer aM eul-draw bulb Leta Sa esade Cos a rjority oe eM 1Ke Mlnq elalaue uN. aM wggrtw tMt char lore nee M included wMa dKatfleleq LM average 1K air within • paoj.oe. Mr. Rroutil daaeratW LML tM eencapt o! psovldinq a elnlrr average lot •ite was inltlated with tM seiwnda 8pwltio Plan. CaaaLLriore Valletta 11nkW tM aeaAlteetusal ea-aotatlwe for projerta within itiwaada r1t4 the aouoepea of sWuaW 1K aoveragr to oerls projects with tM ahatwtet lutaeded !Oe teiwan4. Ib:. trwtil Cue chat any baeagewue ahaagr ee eM itlwanda epwltia Plan .nd eenee tpeoltle Plar or the Develepeent Code will reduce tadlvidual aoaeunicy 1dMtlty. M eGted that easleae lot aonragr reed ealabllehed Sn the City nee only tos when tM lnltlal reaideneee an Wllt, bat nose Seportantly eo dwl wlt6 later prablera anted by individual ornese eoneeeuolLq addit lone and aeeeewry aesuatusea. 9a aa~entW LhaC eL tM tir et apaeltia Plan adoption, tM Clty we aqN aoaeerned wltb aer peojeate providing only "starter brace' tot loves lessee 9e••pe and t1sK Clr bayeee/ heaoe, the City adopted • alnl~ue eeeldaaoe sip et 1,000 square leer to alleviate ehla Plannlnq Cerluion Mlnutr -a- January 16, 1993 eonaarn. F» iodicatad that ae tM tit tMra rw no concern CMt~~.aa Ny actually W too logs tos tMir lots. r Coolaalonar lMleMr felt that tM /tiranda 6pwific Plan dNa not caeagnisa that quagga rare located ie rao yards and Nrvad by allays and tMt Ktaoa rare ptadoninantly in a grid Patton. M auggaatN that tM City aaplora a1Ly aarvN Nlghborhaoda foe naidantial goaga aceau. grad wllar, City Piannar, noted that thaH~ hN teen oppoaitlon to allay served naighhorhaoda Sn tM paw bwaYN Ot concerns rith NtKy aM Nintananca. W Nkad CM ea~iNiN !t tMte aight N • ray to «Aiava thla •look• rithwt actually provldinq allays. rr. eroutll addW tMt •laloerl• alb Flaming lL. a., ensrilinau arrests, Ntbaek voiaty, Kc.) has bNn pralarrad riW pravleua pso~aata _¢waoN o! tM look of Comfy appeevtl pro~aeea io tM 1~Wlab atM, z ~ hN a pradealnantly grid patron alreulaetae ayat~ rltl little KraKwlpi variety. Co~iaalonar va11Kb auggaKad thae • aLLalair vatiatlen io let alN W adoptN to awooaga a gsNNS vo1Ky o! lot alaN sea laildieq aaeeaeka to prwida grNtu atrNeaeap vu/Ky. Mr. eayN suggested eMt tM Ca~laalea eeNld~r rhaC L eM gnat approprlata typ. o! aeyalepseet !es ehe alteoted asau am rNt derelepaeat Kaideeds ehauld N applied W .Haute the type OL develeP~Nt. M rareed tM Cosedesion tiler it Lie /solo /taedsrds .n •looaanad• en0 tM Ca~lssiN prefos Planned Dolt le.eloprecs rlel ea~en epee epees, develoPsrs rill Mvs 1NS lneenttn ee do tM Smovetivs peoi•ot. it t1W eewlelN an pNSible under awie Oevelopaest /teedaeds. lMrelase. M ••V9••t•d !ls aptlonal Developesnt /taedeNS eMald W eesdlW olwaly to psevlde ineeative CO developus to praDoN incur+tlN d.vloprnt/. Mr. tulle a:pleieed chat St awy W Mrd b Noeptaee tM tredltieesl atlranda look rlth tM curtest da+eloperet sesndeMa !or thL sew. N stated that cM coeeiNlon Ny aaeeider tM poasi/illly o! regaleieq 6sildieq Nhloq. eiailu to tMSe ragelred ld llllalda aeM• eA, salleve tM appusanoe of gsNtar wpatatloe Mersa sealdNOaa. ~, Co~lseloMr W1eMr leit flee the K!N!M aeN/ aloeld M sestedied Sn light o! tM NlglaO[IIOOO /sereoadiega. d •W9••t+a tMt 11//eloy rope piteMe ce • ~aslaua slaps o! f to 1] sad r1lMn delvawy/ w rase ysN 9+rNN should M NeauragW. M left flat Mlt-ear. let arNa ooaatraata0 LleagMue rtlrenda Toro set delieerleq tla •teeal awoegiesa• N latended l1 tM rliranM epeailla p1M. Co>.ioloese vallatM aap[N/ad Mt peKereNa for s/Qalrliq redueW let aoneage, Thiel say lead to esaller loa/a oa alallar let/. CoadwiNes Cliclaa eloagle else aaall ld... slag !la [Nten Peauray ..y Moats eaaeal psopetiaa rlelto • abet el~a rllal say ldrreetly Meow peoely aataeetaad aaa proieae a apaelea ta/'a et ela oley for trew.q PlennLq CorL.LOn wlnutas -!- Janwry 16. 1991 Stoma Hayes, rsoclata Planner, pnrntad tM atatt report and praaantad • Np hlghlightinq potential affartad areas. tea dlstrl.buttl a ccaparlwn chart o[ dwalaprnt atandarda undae tM relranM !pacific Plan, Dawlopaant Coda Victoria apacitle Plan, and ?area Viata Spwitic Plr. Otto !trout!!, hputy City Planner, qaw a brut baekgrouM ow eha atiwapda :pacific Plr and tM nawninq tai bNie and option dawloprnt atandarda. H• aeats0 tMt tM basic atandarda llait dawloprnt daritlu and CM plan wN daalgnad to ancoueaga dawloprnt undae CM option atandarda to Cry to retain tM open apace charartaz et atiwnM. /a atatad tMt under eM basic atendasda eM lot also era slgni[Leently larger chap. required for dsvaloprnt in otter arar o! tM city. Na indicate that eta[[ supportW tM rsquast to pacaf.t :?.ogle telly Mtaehad Kara rithln tM Madir PaalAaetial Dlatrict 1.a lfghe o[ rs»n! dlsNaalor CagNdleq tM ale of rltf.-telly aM aingl•-fully unite. tN tale theca could ba • rt raducelon in eM cote! nuabar of dwall!'pa i! dawloprpt la a11orW en celiac lot aLsN then it dwalopaant oreura undae optional atandarda. /a aeatM that 1t CM Coaalaalon chose to raduw tM al.niaua awraga loL •itN, they could alw ehspga aatbaelu or tM marloua lot cowraga l.n order to zaeaf.e open apaaa. Carlaaiorr /Nlohar ataead that tM dlager M1pW La alarllyUq wMtMr to alley s/ngU telly dawloprnt a tM !ladle sae. /a earanesd tMt eM IMdir err f.a Daaleally r~aert to eha leaawy aad tW exriaalon hr alt tMe en attacMd product could Mal son laNlligrtly rltb lsaawy rir. /a tale • change ee pane alegla [sally dmlepaanc nee to eha lsaary ry not W wiM. Hr. lesouell atatW that unMS tM brie atandarda, dawloprnt Cwld rant !n Mnaitiaa of approslrUly • rib pee wn r oppoaad a aultl-fully dawloprnt o! up to la pN aan. corisaiorr Valletta autad that typically CM Carf.aair would ar 7,100 :guar. fwt lots ritb ens latgr lot W loaner eha awtaga ale of tM total iota. aM rr not ip hvor of tW ptepOiad aMngaa antra additional changes an aaM laeludJaq laauLq. tM prertaga of lot eowraga and aot yaeaietlnq or latgar lot eo 1petNN tW awiaga let alN. Ht. Rroutil noted CM propoaad clung. W eW MWIr dLKrloe weld have wry litCla !epee!. /a rid aeatt did pot ar • problr wleh eatalnlnq tM currant ataudarda. tN rid eW dapaee would W rn aignltlaaat in tW Lae wadlua dlatriat. M aotad tW peepeaad oWpga 111 eha Lae /adir atandarda would W nwarary tee tM /. /. fioaa proiaet t0 awwdl aldlaar lot air nqulrarnta. Ha rid r tbd prolapt L par drlgaW, tW iota era toe wall to art tM raqulrranta. Carlaslors lrlaMe felt tMt 1[ aingla telly d/aalopret won panletad !n tM Madf.r area, 1t would net raanbla eradltiaeal aLgle taaLLly dawloprnt. Mr. lctoutll Natad tW pOlae o cbofeo r poulbld. tla rid aignitiartly and LM optloaal U a wall drlgrd pee~aot. t tW riaetaq atandarda w/ t0 pto~iM a many eha coerce Wain ataMaNa !lair tM Mnaity ataMarda allw up to tW nattlaan, provided It Plennlep Corlaslon Minute/ -17- Japuaty a, 1991 Chaisfan MCNlel op/Nd tM public Haring. JoM eyaan, 0. S. Hall Corporal ion, 100 coat SoutMrn, aulte 700, Seape, krisona, .sated thq Ma m coNenta. Hearing no further leatfaony, CMisNY McNiel c1oeW tM publle hearlnq. Ca®ieeioner IM1Mer felt it rwld takl weh larger lots than wen tM currently required 10,000 equase [Nt 16 Order t0 praaerre CM historic ChatlCGer Of Nlirandl. ee NggeKW derelOQMnt ataadasda eoYld W aodltied to help praaerve ehe ehataetec. Ba tMught tM Cewiaaloa say aonaldar ealabliehiaq [lour arN li~ita aM laesauLq Mlldieq NparKlena to perMq 15-tact •ide Yatda ter eingla-Kery hooaN, pYatiog to a 70-fee! eeparatioe, end 35-Loot aide yaede fer fro-KOrY koYeN, equatlnq to • SO-toot eapazatlon. ea felt tM lnoreaaed aatbaekl rwld tend LO CrNte • rlwll aepatatlon. HO NggeKad CeneldeiltlOe OZ eaeabliahinq Mlght 1Llt/ aM tequlzieg • eia O! Ono-and tro-KOrY hO11Na Or all OM/tOty IIWNn. 8e !nought lialelny loot pltab YY b• M1ptY1. M Nld lkat CartNaly !bats la cookirauttet look of coal! let/ atuttW rltk bL9 MYNA. CMSaan McNlel ukad it Co~leeleNr Nleher flit tM eYral look eonld N attained oa tM regwKad lot .loco. CowluloMr 1Y1cMS Celt tM! tM O. N. OOw applleatloa L a ~.ttadltiaeal aubdl~laioe. He Nld then rare • tw dleNeaw~ W hletoeloal archltNtYral fueureN but tM charaeear of tM aubdlrlalon daN lot zaapNt tM ebaeaeter o! KLranG. CNalaaionez Va11Kb felt tM C,a~1N10n eMYld tYrtlles ~aoaaldar Cawleaioner Me1eMr'• auggeatioN In ae attaapt !O pzeNSra tIM itlranda obaradtar. Catfiaalomr To1Kq agreed that arw tM laegN current Kaedard lot else dNa not Nintala tM rural ekaraotOe. ChalraaY NaNle1 stated tM! 1! tM aurswC Kandaeda aN wlntalnad, tM rasa!! rill M wltl-twlly hwalaq Sa !Ir NadlY~ arw. ue. Nsatlll ~ atalW tka! tM piaY rod NC ap ~ ' W rnaodiagr 1nMratiw danlepa»nt untNr eM optional Kaedaida by 1ndlYdlbg dawiq paNUltlaa eor bulldLq eonraatlNal asagla Laa11T anbdlriaiow. M Nid dafrlopan tend to propeN dawlopret ai~llae CO aYbdirlalNa tlr/ Lw brut alaarhara. Hl though! 1t Lba {70~1Nlplata rlahad t0 rar1N tba hula daralep~aa! Kandarda, thq aMUid lank a! not wly IMdl~f aaa Lor Nadlua, bK a1N at all otMr catagoslN. M Nld tM Kalldaeda hors haw la plow toe •lN yaara and perMpa Lt rY tlaa !Oe tIN co~laalw t0 s'ariar the KaadaNa t0 aw it tMy achiara resat w latwdW. M Katad !bat 0. a. Ilbr sagulsw • eaduetion o[ 4M alnlwa arrsaga 1K alw !n !M Ldr Madlw• IWldantlal pLafrlK in order to Mrs eMlr peopoaW daealepawt b• awe/Kwt rltb tka asiatlaq {t !rands HpNitlO -1N. M wld tM aoaalaalw hM the eptiw of bakldg aKion by appeerUq tM awiWbwt as peopoaad, ooKLwing tM Ytbat, or daglnq eM awndaant rithou! pn~ndlw aM pazMpa wttlaq bo • wrbhep to conalder LKYra lr/d1tlNtlOM. planning Cowlaalon Minutaa -1h Januaey H, 1997 Ca~ixloMr Chltix statrd rM vex uncarfortablr wlta drerxsinq lot siur to Kiranda but sN wantW Co rneouragr innnvatiw elurtrriaq o! Dulldings or COxidat Co~LSloorY wr1CMl'r ruggrrliona .o cnrrr mould M x appaaranal OL motr oprmrN. SM xid that roan thougR tM drnriiy nusdwura any M lovers under tM propoxl, tM rltret could M • largr hoax on a rill lot. !M wpportrd an in-drptb workshop to diaeuu LaryrowxnC o! eurrxt staMardr. CMlrman Merlrl rtatrd it wu 61s mMrrstaWlnq that tM usoclatrd eraet it undrr appral to Clty Connell. Brad Bullrr, Clty Plannrr, rCatrd tM DroponxU tot tM traM Np Mw li1W an appral on CM action o! tM Cc~lulor rrgardlnq tMlt lraet. Br ruggrrtrd coat tnr Cosirrion rrmssad aw1a1 of tM arrnarat 1! CM Co~Lxionrra did not fNl ooatortrDlr with CM proposed ararWext and did not [N1 tMy would havr x opportunity to workshop tM xtCr! to arzlw at a sreorredation la thr vrry nor tuturr. Chalrttsa Mrlirl did not [Nl tM Cos11rr10O would b• ablr to Hach • rrcarrndation prior eo proerxlnq o! tM appNl eo tM erntatiw !rect. Br arkrd wMt mould Mpprn to tM appNl if !M Plaaninq Q1Nlxion did not rrreh • drelrlon. Ralph Ranson, Drpt1ly City altosNy, atattl that thr raP rN dN1gnM xru~inq eM approval o! ItN 1 of tM atirarda apaolllo Plan a~aWarnt. x acid withoue approval o! that pertlen of tN aawwirnt, tM City Cooncll mould Mw to xka tM tindLq tMt tM tratatiw.traet it ixoerireaet witD tM ttiwanda dpreltle Plx and tM ruhdlvlaten could cot W sppsorrd. Nr. xllar askrd it !hr applicant ewld rppNl it tM Plaminq CoNiNlon Look no setfon DuC lnstrad eontleuad LM Nttrl. Nr. aanaen rrrpondN nrgatiwly. M augpratrd that Chr C•aixten Nkr a dreision on tM appllxtloa aleea !t vex inltLtN by tM drwloprr. Br raid tM City Could alwyr laitlatr !tr owa arNdaxC to aodlty tN plan if thr Ca_lulonrn latrr [dt it would M rdvantagaoua to do N. Ca~tuioxt wrloMr NMd CM aix o! lotr In the IOOOhratrr auhdivirlon. Mr. Rroutil rrrpondrd tMC thry an 1,200 aquaN trot. CC~Sxiexr Malehrt tr1C that dtiviuq thrergh Chr Rxhrrert ruDdlvUlon !s i valuably rrpatlrnu hroanN It hN arrll lots that K~ net lapaeead Dy owswMlalnq houara. M x1d it hN ringlrxoty Dew! wleb tar rleprd zootr and pnxaN ra aaerardad look. ws. Wllrs agtwd tN[r Np N • lot tlut ddald M doM through drrlgn eelbrla. x rtatrd tea Coarilulonrra auld raeabllah what chap prerlw co M approprlatr 6ulldlnq Nw1opN wiehle a dixslot. M raid that 1n Clarrent • diattiet called •rural rera" vex Ntahllahad with tonlnq of alalau~ 1 aC1Y loea. 9a ga~rntW tMt ClatafonC Cltp atalt !N1 LC it dahatabU whathrt tM let aixa rod tM !ar attaat Lptovaaant tundaedr eaatr • run! atanapMn.. 9a rtatad tMt un1Na hulldleq rnwloprr and Plannlnq ComlNlon MinutN -]9- Sanuary !, 1991 einla Ot Ytlev unit alit are zagelsad. LM opaa apaea amlalonad Yy not Yterialisa. Cc~laaionas Tolatoy tali tM araa in claraaont aharad chat Gaitln o! LntrutruMUra, Yeb u W Barba or qutbn, Ke.. did Mlp to craab a sural enasacGr. la did not teal tM iKaM o! tM Miranda ipaclfle 91u Se Mlnq eK. BO YgyaKad tha ceaaiaalon Kudy rays to ueeeplla6 LMY goals. ineludlnq looklaq at attaata aed intruiruetura. le. iallar said tMt, baeYY of tM aarrouadlol lard sae patterY and eanaity raagea. CM ielraMa ipac!!la Ulan aeY aentk Of Lhe traaYy rill unliluly attain CM ltlranda rural lock ~1aloYd ter the apps ltlraMa att. Ccaluiomt Yloher Katad CML Cetluloner Ielatoy• pazeapiiw wa that CM Malgnara of CM plan atlsaaa CMC iM asY aoatk o! tM fsaarq scald rot M abU to main its rural eharaKar. N Yid M had alt Marl that aenClalant aaprHaad by othece. Cnalr'Yn relial spread. lr. lrwtll Katad lMee la alt • aignilLeaaC aw.oaY e! Les Iladlee land nattk o! eM lraerq. 9b aaW the poet aaaaitlaa art ru tM rise art norN o! MY LlY in tM ae~a rMse ttlweda avYY L• Oct ppi00 M b ridMled and reek curbs and tsar rlndeere are gollq to a •alKaleed. M said the art south o! lace Llae rill Mee ptO~eot propoYle aLL1Y L crepe to tM tl. i. " Bar pro~eat and tMrelere tM He~laaleaYa akesld dllaeee Mat tMy !Nl CM Ler Madla^ art akeeld look 11M. lbtlee~ MMtl by ChitiN, aeeendad by valletb. Co sedeawaa dYLal o[ inriroMantal aaYaaaamt and ltiraMa fpeal!!o flY a~edaaat 19-03. MKien earriad by eke lellerlai aad:e~ snit CGIl1Il/Id~ia QIItllir llllII.r ~r yd6llVt, vaLL9Tfi losl~ oau:ula9mua rm allllt~ oo9rxuid9D0/a . lm -aasried CoeliYloYr 'iblatey eappaatad tMt Meant it scald b• dltllanl! to cart cM peals and ol~eetltY o! iM~Btiralldt ipeol!!e T1Y !i tie arM 6y CM lraawy, tM oo~laaiae •ay M1A to reeanW sanoad e! that asea !ra tM p1Y It eM trrieelenan felt 1C roald M approprl.aq t0 have • aanentlaYl eookie- cuttes aekdltLlea L tkaC asea. M Yid the tkl~LNlen akeuld eeY1Yt rkether the Beall and e~eotivH are lepertala• aM 1! aor nar KaMaeda ahoal0 W lesaolated. ~ CkalsYn loliel avpgeltad tMC tlO~1Y1MIai Sblitey'• aid IN1eMr•• auggeitune M diaaaaaa0 at,tM ilaaalfq tkafilules reskaksT el January 16, 199J. Plaminq ca~laalY M1Ytei -10- January •. 1993 Chairman McMlel opened CM public heuinq. Thera were no eeminta and ha cleeed the public Muinq. y Co®iasion•r Vallatt• eoneurrw with Ca®SN1oNr 1Nlehr•. idN. Motion: Mooed Dy Valletta, seconded by Me1eMr, to reea,wend leevanee of a xagatiw Decluatlon eM adopt tM resolution reeo~nWlnq approval o[ Environmental AuueNnt a:W 6tiranda Specific Plan Arndwent 91-O1. Motion carzLd Dy the Collorinq vote: AYES: CDmMISSIOMERSx C9ITIEA, MCNIEL, M[LCBrx, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE xoes, caalsslamexs, laxa ABSBIPT, COIaInIONaaS, hdn -carried • • . . . O. D. S. xraar CDI!lORATIdm - A ragmat to aaanat Nrtain develeprnt standards ritAin CM ttiranda Specific Plan N described Mlor~ 1) To allow aingL lrily detached reaidentlal dewlopwmt within the Madiuw xeaidsntial District (8-14 drsllinq mite, per acre) utlliainq eagle Devslopawnt Scandardat and 2) To reduN tM wlnlmv average lot siN tram 10,000 square fNt t0 E, 900 square teN within tM Law Redly Midsntlal Oletrict (4-8 dwelling mite per sera) uwder Wle peNlopmeec seandarda/ and 3) To redoes LM,minlaao average lot alN trove 10,000 square test to 9,500 square feet rllhln CM MaOluw Seaidanllal District (e-14 dwelling unite pas ace) mMr Naie DavelopmNt atanduda. Sta[I rseamaenda 1sNanN of • MegatiN DaClaeatim. Relalad tiL: Environmental AaeNeNilt and VNiinq SanGtive Tract 1.711. Steve Nayea, AaaOCilee P1MMr, pr4lNptad CM seat[ report. Ca,mLsioner Va13etN at-ted eM realisW that related VNtlnq 'hntatiw Traci 14411 ru • Npatate loos, but aM queatloeud tM emallNt lot •!te and minimum setbaelw proposed on that teas. Me. MayN replied tM tract Aad bean designed t0 meet tM minLaum Dasic standards o[ 7,700 aquae tNt wlnimum lot aiN, • oat minimum 76-toot [root yud astDack [tam CM property 11N, a corNr •iM yard setback of 45 feet, a comDinW sides yard setback o! 1S fast, and a tsar yard aethaak of 70 teas. Cams,lNloner Ms1oMr ukad why the City would ooNiMr lts~a 1 and 3 of ens proposed amandwNt 1! flu applleaCian for tM tract amp no lengar regvind Chow changes. Mz. Hayn statW eMt staff felt it would W appteptia~e eo addrga the love to keep the hieruehy of tM toNa Ln line. 9e nip flu amandaant requnc shad soma 1lght on CM overall dawlopaunt Nandaeds Mlthin the Et iranda Specific Plan. Planning Comwiaalon Minutes -14- DsaNDer 17, 1991 Co®luioner lM1eMS Katad he had had an oyportmlty to tour the City recently and felt tMt current dewloprnt dws not errs to M retaining tM rural character o! Btiwanda ae detlned unMr the Btlwaada Speckfie Plan. Ae felt the result to r eon o[ a typical euburbla, awn On tM larger lots, with a few historical nferweee such a lront poechr and ur o! atom. r quaationed why iM city would do urytbimj to dowegtaG tM denser ranee. Xe felt iC may. W approprLb to detetelm tMt tM plae wu eorreM ae adopted. Brad Bul Ur, Clty Plainer, eGtad LMt whw ate[! [tree wu appzoachad regarding an amenernt to tM ttiwama dpeei[ie Plan, a question was raised about tM potwilal Lor allwinq Slagle Lastly horn LD riti-[rily zone. Be uld ataf[ felt it was rrwnaDU to allow a dawlepet web N option In this case. Ra noted these such an optios lm penittad la other anal o[ the City. Ne said in looking at [M standards [or tear 1 and 3, it wu hit tMn wu rocs [or sod![leaeion, Dut tM COrlulan dM not haw to GM action on any provision otMr than Itr Z Decaur it nlatr to the Wetinq nntatiw Tract. CO®leeloner IMLeMr thought that tM plan alseWy pseeittr eL~gle [amily develOprnt in aor of tM sours at tM lower end bard m lot size requirarnes. r rid 1! tM denlapr wanted W Obtain • hlghet demicy, it required an innovative approach. r ehought tM~ aessdree would lame persie mean density under eM bale ataedarde. Dan Coleman, Psiaeigl Plaanee, etaeW that ~ onteeet7} single [ashy dewloprnt is pereitted !n rdir :oaidq oMSe' op61ar1~ etee0aeds. Otto Rrwtil, wpuey Ciey Planmt, stated tbat all dmlepeaet staMards Ln the tabus an related to our aneeMr as attain inarelwr ~wn Duilt into the density ranges in curb category to a!lespt to get tM dswiOpa to build under tM optional Kandarde. r felt tM[ i! !M elandecda were arnded, shay ahwld M changed in rte ehan em dreley ~ eaege brwr all of the ranqu are Lnnreonnseted. 0• thought tM nlatlve relaCimehip between the ranger should M kept !n a logical saqusnae. Nithseaprt to allowing •1ngU trily here is tM Mediae Residential dUtrlat, M rid CMC on prolwu which had brn eubeittW to tM Citp tM dfreatir tree City Connell was not to obleM to single tartly dewlopamnt !a am aced tee salt!-family. Me eheught that wu consistent Kith City Coamll pggit7 eo Mw • proper mix oL mingle tamLly wrsue rlti-Lrily units. CorLaiorr r1aMe uksd LL the asmndsmnt rrld for pssle eM building o[ a •Sngle [ashy detaehW produce aacordinq to tM Wsla standards. Mr. Coleman rid eMt eM proposed aradrnt air iaaluMs provisions eo change the dniene awtage 10,000 square loot loE Hr. Mr. Rroutil raid tM 10,000 square tore lot sir is larger thin the minimum average let •iae la tM next dietriet. Cariuloner Me1aMt quutioned Mnslty wlwlatire. M ~rksd it tM 10,000 square toot lot sir easisue densLCy yield of •.76 dwellleq ueib per sue for Planning Coriuien Minutes -17- DeoeeWS 17, 1991 eonoentional single family residential dsvmlopmant would Lnelude land dedicated for local KrmNS. Nr. rroutil statmd only private etrNb can M used Ln tM calaalationa. Nm uid at eM time tM mtiwanda Specific Plan was adopesd tMts was • MMta sa to wMLMr atreete would W public or prlvaN. Na said tMre wa • desire to haw a rural eoounity and tMre was a strong pnssura to allow private streets with non-public type standards weh as rolled curbs, rock eurM, etc. Na eaid dewlopmsnt under tM optional ataedasds could probably not M a conventional lot subdivision and would probably my on priraLS circulation. Commiulonsr Ns1eMr d!d not feel a dsmity of 1.36 drsilinq unite par acre could M obtained i[ tMre were public streKS. Nr. ]croutil agreed that was correct. CaamLSionmr NmleDme stalmd that if tM minimu. average lot sia moss changed tram 10,000 to 8,500 it would incrpw CM density. ComissioMr Va11Kts seated sM was cronesrnW tlut a lower minimum lot sirs would not msN CM Satsne of ohs 7tiwanda spacitie Plan. aM d!d not feel a 7,700 minimum squaes Loot lot would mart tM Lntsnt. comisslonmz IMIeMr said CM plan already Ms as sKabllsAsd minimum. M said tM Cosiulon ws Mleq ukad to rsdnq tM avmeags, no! tM mlaimum. Cooiuionmr Vallstem ~autsd tM aondrne would atfmat tM ~rwindsr of the land throughout ^tiwanda mpselfia Ylan, including man moeeMrly sites. Nr. Bulks staesd that tM only other Lew NWium is just noKA o! eM ana of Vutinq Tsntatiw Tract, just noKh o[ LM fzwwy,' Mr. Icroutil sGtsd !Mt tM focus Of tM ttiwaeda Dpsclfie Plan wu on LM corm area north of Nq Line and lurthmr aqy from tM con tMrs was leas muphui• on tM protection of tM rural asmosphsrs, Amncs, tM Msdiua and Low Medium dsalgnatlons. N mold tM CanLSion shenld aonsidse 1! tM City mould prefer a molt!-[oily pmjset ac • density otup to 1{ unlls qe acre Ln a Nedius duignation oe a slaglm tally auDdlvislon with 1,000 squasm foot loo. Chairman Nemisl opened tMe'publie Haring. Charles echults, Mid-a Nllysr, 599 North 1lzsowASad, •an Nenardlno, slated Am rsprsNntsd 0. a. Neo Corporation. N rsquotsd that tM Commiulon proceed witd aatlon om Ier 2 0! Ua proposed amsndrnt to nducs tM minimum awragm let slam Sn otdse to proceed with V~slinq Tsnlativs Tract U711. Nearing no fuKMr testimony, CMleman NcNlsl closed CM publlo Asarinq. Nr. Nayu eammantad CMt since the ptojeet wu adnetlsed, tM Clty Council had changed tM entire atq of Tentatlw Tzaet 1{711 to a Low Medium dulgnatlon. N aid tM adveKLed request to nduae CM minlaar avenge lac Planning Comnluion Nlnutu -1{- Oecsmber i), 1991 ale to 8,900 aquae teat and e, 500 .guar. fan for the Low eaeiuc a.:d tedium erne napaetiwly van nor raeowandad to M B, S00 .guar. faK ant 8,000 .guar. taK napactiwly in order to mwt tM naada of tM wKinq IYntatlva TraM. Commiuionar ealeMr elated tM! the 6tiwauda Spaeltle Plan curnnlly ca1L for s minima awraga lot alto of 10,000 .guar. LaK for both tM Low Madiw and Mdium daalgnatlona and M quutionae why LM Medium now needed to M lau loan tM Low Medium. Nr. Hayaa atatad St wu rraly racaasandad to rincain a hierarchy balwwn CM dulgnationa. Coriuionar Valletta rtalaa that in pra.Lwa diaeuuiona ngardinq eha zadulgnation of land !n tM rtiwaada Spacitic Plea area • auggaKion waa made regarding limiting tM amount of allnwaDla DuLldabU apnea on dltfarut lot.. she taara0 CMt eM City will and up with 7,700 agaara toot lots with 2,000 to 3,000 aquae toot homaa. SM felt it would M poaalbla to wintain La. intent of CM rtiwanM dpaeltle plan Lf tM buLldabL area of tM lot. i. limited. she tali LMt world alw Mip prw1M atterdabla hwaioq. Mr. SulIer Katad that the lot eowraga La !!sited to t0 pastor! Lo tM Low Medium mod Madius Maigwtiew and ne ohanga wan auggaatad to that peseaneaga. Cowiuionar Malchat aWlad tMt 10 parewt covartga 1• a~•gsrt Mal of eowraga. - Coriulonar Valletta agreed. CarLalonar r1cMr agreed that walls 1Ka.would M aecaptabla with modaat houua, but h• [nand larger Mugu will Kl11 M built and talc that would hurt the Sntant of tM apultle Plan. Chaisrn Menial tali tMt leNnatinq quaKlou bad born nlaad. e• aaie M undantood tM philosophy of anewraginq alagla !wily danloprot owr rlei- twily davalopssnt. Mawa-ar, M was aoneasrd tM! tM City nay M giving up rn ehu necessary. N thought • workshop to dlsww all tM laws might M Mlptul. .n ..,, t:erlulowr Va11atN tslt eMrs i. nKhieq reoeq with moll-Mmignmd multl- !wlly dewlopree and aM thought tMn eeuld M non attraetiw suit!-fanny dewlopssnt thw erewdsd single !molly haws. Ne. Duller Katad that tM Cerission hu tM diwntionary wehoriey to day • pro~eet it tM Carlulop lwls Lt dwa sot rat tM Satwe of tM rtiwanda rpsei[Se plw. Ma meld pn~aMS can M dwlad whKMr they era singls tw11y or rlt i-fully. Ma gwKiowA Lt t0 grcent oovseags w • 10.000 squan toot lot would not give pKwtlally tM ear 1JYq• r • t0 parow! cowrags on an s,S00 squats toot loc. CorUSlour Msloher Kaesd the inlelsl appliaatloa hW bra subsittsd in 1939 sod ha uksd why !M lot sin qusstlon had nor a1nWy bore aerlderW. Planning Carlasion Mlwtaa -13- Daeasher 1'!, 1991 Mr. culler atatae that it was thought it [Ra projart was eonaidmrad at the same Lima a CM specific plan amandaant, it wwid qiw tM Calelaaton N opportunity to ap how potNtial davaloprnt might look. Ha though! eR>t it the arndrnt had bNn toswardad to tM Cariaalon yithout • project proposal, tM Comslulon Ny Raw ukad stet[ to proviN aawral seaparioa to show wMt typo of davalopaant might occur. Coriuionar CRitiu agreed witR tM idea o! allowlnq siagla [rlly datlchad Rouslnq in place of wlti-fatly dawlopmNl, MC sM ws uneamtortaDlm witR lowrinq the lot slso. SM tal! tM amwni of coverage Sa an important Lntagral part of !M plaminq. SM thwght tM! • rural eharaeNr was anvislonW for KSranN. SM notal !MC lowmrLq tM siN of pateal^ gsnarally dws nK result in arllas RouaN Mlnq built. EM was only comfortable uitR Itr 1 of tM request. CRaltmtn Heelal s!a!al M wN not anxious to proceed. Corisaionar ealcMr aakal tM rritiealiona of not aotinq op !M arndrnt with rNpaet to actions on VmatLnq SmneKlw TraK laZll. Mr. Buller KKal tM! proposed Vaatl,p zrtatlw rraK 1a]ll would nmad approval of Itr ~ of tRm arndmant in ordae to male tM Llndinq that tRa tract is conalatmt wiN tM Klranda Sp)citie )Lae. M Nid !M )eiwaala Specific P1N aredmrt inwlval a laal uN datialee lpdapandan! or Ny otMr propouL Mtera tM Craiolon. Hr Nid tM decision pamdad !o M Daaal on tM rrits of CM specific plan aarndmaee, pot on a apNLtie proposal or project. CammiuloNr Va11Ktm tai! that Lt Item Z wmra approval, it would p.cmic a 7,]00 square toot lo! rlth a 3,000 aquarm toot home unlra tM Corlsalon splc![iwlly addrNNd whae was axpaKal. Mr. Buller statal !MC awry deign rnimr process has • multleuda of cMcka and Dalancaa. Ba said tM coda a6ahliahN a miniaum, W! !M di)crK SOnary review procru allawa tM )lannlnq Co~iuloe to daUrmio• it CM project is appropriab or not. CamLNieNt Va11Ktm Nkal rMt Ratt•m auggaatioe could M toe how tM ceriNion should proceed !t tRa Coe.alNloMra dal not !r1 erteriablm with the arndNnt. ltr. cellar Nld tMt !t tM CommlNloe did not [Nl oomtortaDia or find concluaiw mvidmaea to justify appewal e! • oMnga, L! should deny cRa amandsant of eopilnua tM aandamnt for turtMr emvLew. Chairman Meeial !al! !MC Lf tM few eadlum Nandatdm arm chaegal, tRa Hadium acandarda should also M eRangad in order to maletate oontlnuiey. Nm ^aid thae would apply to M1New o! the ewinmity wharmvmr !M drigMeiona era locatal. Hr wanted to aaa rMn also eM aorta an loaatal and qumatlonal eha )vaneual result for eM ca~aunicy. Planning Coasalaaion Mlnutaa -16- December 17, 1991 Cowiaaionmr 141char qumKionad tM park raquiraeaK far VaKLp Tmntativm Trait 14211. N acid !t was hU unGzataMloq tMt tM nunDmr of houwm .~uld draw a population tMt would rmquira a 2,33 germ park dadieation. kr. Bulimz rmapondmd alfirnativlly. Co®Sulonmr Wlehmr ukW it tM otMr 10.6 aeraa rhieA rill M put in a an inearia dmtantioa Darin and latae bmeow park land would M ovmr aM show chat would M tmqulrW for tM projmet. e. said tMt 1t that war tram, tM 10.6 acrmm divided by tM proposed 226 1Ka could rmprasNt about 2,000 squaw fast par lot. B• rtotmd that it tM tutuw park laed wmw to b• ammoeiatsd with the itnllvidwl lots, tM lots would thw ama! tM 10,000 squaw toot aomraga minfaun lot aiw. Chairman Mcrial ukad it tM Cowluionmra [mlt thmy rantW to aK an stiwanda Spmcific Plan awodwnt a9-03 oe it CMy world !wl norm comtortablm eontinuinq tM itw. Ca®Suionmr Chitima tall eanfottablm rith aMieq en tM anaodaant. Coaniaaionat ga11KN wld aM could act oe CM amsedmsu! u pwaaKme. CommUalonmr To1KOy wan eonoaread shear lormzlnq tM lot aiw but eel lowmrinq tM lot eovsragn. N tmlt largm houmw w anallme lots world QsfNt CM !slant o[ tM plan. coaaeiaalonmr CAltlw aupportad Ityn 1 Dnt d1d not support Itaw 2 or 7. Camniasionmr To1KOy aupportad giving dNaldpmrly'}6'm option o[ dmwlopinq •ingla Lwily dmtaeMd Musing to Madlun dssignstlow, but M wantmd a reduction of lot eevmragn en eM snalUr lots. CMlrman Nclfiel was wnemsnN above radueLq tM slw o! tM dwmllinga. Hm did not fwl tM Clty rwily wants tiny Muew. Cemniaaionmr Va11Ktm tmlt tMt • awllis Maw on • 7,200 squaw loot lot would wsult !n ae avKagm et awllmr bons oa se awragm paraml. 8hs said eM could nK vlauallw Mr allwlnq lladlun Msldrotial armor to~dswmlep as •inglm family dmvmlopaant world~Nmt tM SntmK o! tM ~tiwanda apw/!le Plan. shm did not support any pOKlop o! tM anandYOt. Mt. aullmr KKad that tM Omwlopnsnt Cods pmw1N 5,000 square foot lot• with a saslnw SO psrowl eevmeags undmr Msio KaWlrQS. w said tM stiwanda apwi!!o Piw eely alloq 40 pmeowt nermlags u tM ausinum. Hm wlteweW that all aadw aem nlalww, but it lm dlsowtlosary w tM pare of tM Cca~inloa t0 dory dsmnloparnt !t !t only owls thm~•nlnl~um and la not compaeibls rlth tM aslghborMoO. ~ ~^ Cossiulowr ToUtey Katmd tMt gsweally dawslepawl !s proposmd at tM minLaus KaMards. Planning Coawlsslen M1nuNa -37- Omomnbsr 17, 1991 Co~lamioMr w1eMr quutionmd tM park requirmaent for V~Klaq lentatiw tzmet 11411. em aid it ru hie undmretandlnq eML tM numbmi o! houue weld draw • population that would regale a 1.33 sera park dedleation. + Mr. Buller rmeponded atfirmatlv4y. cammiuionmr xmlehes ukW 1t tM othmr 10.6 sates which rill M Wt Sn a an interim dmtmntion Gamin and later Deear park land would bm owr ud show ahaE mould M rmqulred for !M prolmot. N and tWL St CMC wmem arum, eM 10.6 mores dlvlded by !M pmpeaW 246 lots would repreamet shoat ],000 aquae [aN per lot. 8• holed that 1[ tM [alarm park land M•t• to M umoolaead with tM individual lots, thm late would Lbws emet tM 10.000 aquarm tone average minimum lot else. Chairman hcmiel eked if tM Coeminlonete tel! iMy wetmd to set on ftlranda speeitle Plu arndamnt 89-03 or it thq mould !N1 worm comtortabla contlnuinq !M ltr. Caaeluioner Ch1tiN felt ertorlahU wlth aetlaq ae the ameadmrrc. Cae+iaaionmr valiatu maid eM could aM on tM aaMMdallt u pzaeMtad. Cariaaionee Soletq ram eonemtnad shoot loeerlaq thm lot else but net ioreriq tM let eovmrage. r Nlt largm houses N eea1ler lots would delmat LM Satent oI the plan. ~ - Coriamieur Chitir supported Itr 3 but did not NPPert Iter 1 oc 3. CoAlesiore lblslq eupportmd glvlaq develepeea Cho optioe of dmvmloplnq ^1ngU icily deluhmd heueinq in rdium dNigealSOne, bat N wancmd a zaduMion of lot rogeaga en CM wliss lots. Cnaleean Memlml wu eonesrrd about nduoLal the a1N et thm dwellln9s. xm did not trl tM Clty really canto tiny housr. Caemieslore Valletta telt that • erlles 6oaN e0 • 7x100 square toot lot mould Hauit in as aweaga' or wallar her N N aeeiaga paedl. fM uld aha could not vlsuallr how allowing rdiua fssidNtial aNr to develop a •1ngU taeily development could"re6 the 1nteM et tM ftlwaMa fpNltle Plan. she did no! wppoet aM. portion et tM ammnAaeat. Mr. fuiLr stated that LM Davelepmen! Code psemlta f,000 sgwre toot lou with • sakL•r f0 peeeNt coverage under baalo alen0ards. M uld the feiwanda apritia plea only allows 10 poreeut oo.esage u eM rmimum, xa rsiteraeW tMt all cedes aN mlalamr, but i! la dllorelleaary N tM pare o[ CM CoslNioe to dNy davelopsmne 1! 1t Daly rate tM mlalrm and is not eospaelble with the Mlghboehood. CoMlsslorr yolstq stated [net gerrelly developNt la proposed at the minlaum etandaede. Plaaninq Casluton MLautee -17- Oecamber 17, 3991 Cosluiowr wsleMr Lit that parnaq ths. Cliy should also eontidsr astaDlLklnq floor arse ratio. bseauu two stosp hones potmnelauy doublycna .i:. of tM hoYa. Commluionsr Va11siN ukal 1! tM Flaming Comaiuion could danp the application sal allow eM applicant to return w1tA • psopoYl that [cold ales aadrasa the asouat oL cotiraq. or It it would W hafts! to workshop tM ieam. CMlran tlcwlal aUtal M world twl mo[a mmfortabU it M kal ao opportunity to look at CM Mlanca of tM coasanity wnsn chi/ olgkt apply. e• suggaatal tM itsm W continual to allow !or LurtMr ts~isw. Co®SYionsr Vmllstb did net sN any bsnalit to continuing tM itY unLY a workshop wars Mld. kr. soils[ acid that iL tM Commission wan !o enaoaa to oontlnw eM rtlwanda Sgeitle Plan aYalmsnt. eM Caswiaalon would Moo to sithst confines or deny Vsatinq Tsntatiw Tract 14711 WcauY findings could not M Yda that Ns tract Ls eonaistsne wick tM itiwsala apacltie plaa.~ Caamisslowt Tolatoy tslt M Yalsd mop lnlormatlem. CMirman Mcaisl rsopsasd tM public Haring. Mr. aehulta statal M did net rYliss Lnsp wsn:i in mmay~ odtdarna about tM imp.at wlentn eM saYlnuq seas of eM Riwmnea ep«lela piad~ Rm raquaaeal that the Coaaliuiom liwit Stem 7 of Riwanda apdolllo plan 71asn6asnt 89-03 to only apply to LM yrogrty eentalaal wltkLl YY!!pq yaatatlm Tract 14711. fls said that would thY allot CM CeYisaloa t0 !also addrama tM Lsuss toe CM rsmaialsr of !M tllwaMa apmeltie non. ea sale tMy woale •rlk. to peoeaal with the !tact. Rs did not fYl tMta wua am ooawsaa rsgaedlnq eke dsaign of tM tract otMr ehY sat of tM afros! dtllgn. Chairman Mctlial again Clonal tM pub116 twriaq. Mr. BulUr eautionsd tM Co~laalaa shoo! an aolloq avoh as daserlbad Dy Mr. Scnult:. ea Yld SL tM cersasioe~ wars eo naM eksv akangs !or cns applieant•s land mly and not allow"1af~llar aeanearea !or tM adioinlnq paresis, it Yy crNlm semm~'altvatlena !Mt say nol'M appeopslalC CaamissioYr Tolatoy lmlt tM wMla aituatiea rpulraa turtMe awlysia. ws Calf CM 1Ygm oL CM lntan! of !M telwanda epseliia plan should bs rsviaital. Chairman Hollis! fait tM ltsm akould M oontlnwd to paealt a werMnop to considat tM rsnaindar o! tM !!!woods apsoltlo plan. Mt. !olio[ Yggaatad tM CcYlulon Yy w/ak 'to eoallams CM matNe to January B, 1997, aC whlah tlaa ehay eonld tMn paeMpa adiaarn to • wrkskop ae tM and of eM eaqular aaia!!lq and dlsauaa tkla matt/[ tarlMC. planning CorLaion Mlnueu -18- Daesmbsr 17, 1991 Hotiom Hoved by weMlsl, seconded Dy Ealebir, to continua rnvirowntal AeNawnt aM VNtinq Tanta[iw Tract 3{211 to January 8, 1992. Motion carried 6y tM tollorip rotes ~ AYEa, COlW28aI0lfEEai CHITIG, MCNIQ., nELCBER, TOLSTOYr VAi.LE1T6 NOEas CDIm1IaaIONEaai MoNE AasrnT, CdewlsaloMEEa~ MoME -carried • • ~ ~ P. Ea92RONlmITAL AaaES91Ra'1' ISr3 VraTIma TtmTATii.'- 9'A_ 1{211 y a HoMR S88C?BaTjQII - A proposed teneatlw tract map and design revier for eM dewlopant o! 226 simple !oily lots on a1.2 eases o[ land within eM 8tlwanda speeitle Plea to tae Medium and Lov-INdi~r Iu~aiGotlal Districts (B-1{ and •-B drslllnq unite pat sere, rsspeotiwly~, located On tM aut aide of EtiwMa Awmis mouth of tM Dsoors IrNray aM west of Eaet Awnue - APH, 227-211-01, 09, 13, 16, sad 32I 327-191-15, 227-tai-1{t and 227-263-11. atatt raeoasaoda laNann of •` wit'igataa npatiw declaration. Rs1atW tlle~ 6tiwaMa apsaltie Plaa Amsedwe a9-03. CMlrwn MCML1 asked how to proceed on Its P sines~Kiwaeda specific Plan ANndrat 89-03 had not bNn approved and it was his undsrstwdlp tMt It needed to W approved 10 Order [or !M Coswlamlea to appsow Vweloq Tentative Tract 1{211. - Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advisW eMt tM Co~iuion could eonelnue or deny tM project because It Ls 1neoNiaeeae with tM exlatip rtlwanda apeet[ic Plan. M su9geatsd CMt tM ComriNlOd Ny wish !O w it tM applicant would liM to request a eoneinuana~. Chairman McMlsl opaNd !M public Marine. Charm achult:, Eeid a Hellysr, a99 Nort4 ArsowMW, aaD Mtnardlno, stated M Md Men instructed by Aim clianc to adv1N eMt tbay did not wish • eontlnuanee. e• ragwited that tM C0~-p1Ca dray tM pro~sat nthsr than continue lt. He Nld tM applicant bellmPed !t to M a gaod~proiaM. Hs Bald tM applicant Md tsqumeted Chat lpNltla Play ANadenC a9-03 and Vweiny Tsnutiw Tratt 1{211 W Hard CpetMe. Me. Hanaoa stated M understood tM appllcu~t'• truatratlOn an0 ehslr NgesnNa !o qst tM Preiset bstdrs eM Clty Couaoli. Ea Nid that !t tM Cwwlsaian dNiW tM crest a Mip ineoaslsteee, tM Neter could than be appealse to City Couaail. B• Nid that !t tM Plaaalp Cosalulon ware to aubsaqusnely approee tM Etlwanda apeeltle Plan Aaandmeee Mtere tM council Aad Mud eM appeal, eM Netmr would tMa M Net sad !M Couaoll would to all ltksllhood raeuro tM Ntbr to LM Planalp CaNlulop bNauu LM Mrits had not bean reviewed. Re suggested that Ny delay eM pro~met awn torches. Planning CaNli~lon M1auNe -19- DecesDer 17, 1991 Mr. 9ellyer felt tM Cc~iaeion should eoneider VptLlq Teetatiw Tract 14211 tnL ewni~q Dared open whetMr tM asp a~W propoead condition. of approaal, but nor neepeasily tM Naign, are appropriate. M agreed !M Coeeieeton would W dpytoq tM project because it La inconeiKent with tM exiati~p Btiwanda apeeLfie plan but M requuted that tM Ce~ieeloe eonelder tM merit^ of tM project and consider whKher tM ieprovaante ren pcaeeary on Millar. Be felt tM pmjert would eventually M appealed to the City Council. commialioner Va11Kb eked for c1ar1[ication that iL had bpn tM appllcanY• chair. to haw tM Kiwaeda Specilie plan anendrn! and iM tract run concurrently. Nr. Senults rppoaded aftirsatlwly. .. enairman NcNlel auggeKed tM applicant eeaMnt G eM paojeK. Nr. Senults Kated that tM engineer aM dplgeer, 3;eith DagoKino, L. k. Nainecott, wu availabU to anMS quplSOee. {e eald the prepeaal nor calla for 220 to 222 Iota, 1aKeW of tM 226 lot. regeseted Deepp of proposed redesign and eifelnatioa oL tM cul-da-pea. A. tlt tME Lgro.~nta to x11Ur awnw aheeld only M MY-Ktpt lascpd.of fell-Keeek bscpp tM traneportatioe generatW by tM project should cot eeepaitab tail-KreK LprovernL^. N did cot fpl the projeat vu largo seoegh to juKity Mvleq to reaonatruK tM {tiwaeda aveew/Millet aveaw fetssaeatioe order tM frewap, which M eald meld aoK bKriin fl to ~3•.OLIIion. 3li~pld they were wLllinq to pay tMlt ~ pertlon aw ehar~ ~baaW ae t~"i'diwlopret Ln tM arp. Ne dieeuued tM pack cite. Me uid u tM tire! developer rithln tM ran Sevaine drainage plop rise, they rare requlrsd b.dMlgn a dlraln.{a. plan that would work for 923 gasp. Me pld tMls yropoeed plae aoeelata of • 10.5 acre dralpge Dpie. W pfd eriglnally tM aeedl!!ps spslrsd..tM applicant eo dedicate only eM! portleu of tM Mein Lepeoted Df- tMir projert and the replnMr of the cite reuld M Mld Su reserve ae the! other dewlopn weuld tMn pay Lor the lspsovarnb and purehap tM sits Lsss thy. N pid tM current proposed eondltlaea require dedlGtloe of tM eOtire ans. Me proposed that ehq dedlpb CM 2.33 aceq o! park laW ae0 ply tM portion of tM dKeKlon baeie eewaeary to ppport CMIr pssiaet w1t6 tM baLnee Mld in reprw b M purehaaW Dy aubNgaen- dewlppera ae needed. Me requested the! they oely 4 required b beat a postlea o! the additional coat of tM lnewaN le tM-sort. of tM web; plahnod dseleage..fpillty bared on tM perwntags ihat.tMLe {3.2 acre ie of the total f2{ sorer. Ceemissiops ghltisa rsqusKed olariricalLop p tM appllaaK'• psopopl for the park aed tM 3a[t COaulaaLon'a regprt. Mr. Sohulta Kalsd the park ceeelpion eeuld rely requlrs tM! they dedicate 2.33 ecru aM hW ragw3tsd that Lt b ppaetts Lra~ ohs drainage basin beaup eM [ngLnssrleq Osparteent Aad dstetslesd it needed tM pure dKSntlp Dple arp toe • dKeetion b31e. 31a proposed that they be penlttae to loeab tM perk in • portip o! tM 30.f datsatiee Waln elec. Co®ipioner TolKOy eked Nhat would kappp 1L eo KMS land rp avallabl• foe the Gtptlon buie. plannLnq Conwisaien Mlnulss -20- Oepebr 17, 1991 Nr. Schulte aid that LM Clty would have to ensure that subsequent dwelopers purehua the land neceuary and that tDe design works. Ha aid tMy ware willing ea dedicaU the whole 10.5 acre •Lts to M used for tM detsdtlon basin to eh. City a park land to build t park later, but [M Park Ca®Suion had indicated they want the park now and 6ngineerinq Dad indicated they wanted the detention basin now. He did not fwl tMlr project should have io dedicate 10.5 acres [os the detention basin plus 2.33 acres for the park. Heating no further testimony, Chairman NtNlel closed the public hearing. Sarrye Hanson, 9enlar Civl1 6nglneer, stated chat Coeriuioner Tolsioy had Ldent ified the down aids of eDe applicant's propoNl7 i.e., how dove the Clty idsntify the other psoperty to be aced for e11e detention buin if 2.3 acres of tM deGntion basin ^Sb L1 used for the park. e• Bald then is currently vacant property including property on the nortD aide of tootDlllo however, the owner of that property obj Bete to any proposal to wp tneir property. ComeLSioner Tolstoy felt that even though tMn wu a poasiDility of later identifying tDe additional 7.33 scree needed for the detention basin, the area •DOU10 M ideneltied now. Barrye Henson proposed • condition of approval LML the developer must identify eDe altenate property prior to recordation of tM llnal map if tDa Coeriuion agreed with U. S. Hoer the[ they sDOUld M allowed to use par[ o[ Lhe 10.5 acres for tM park. Cosmic inner ToLtoy eked if Nr. Nanaon meant identify and amlu available or just Ldenti[y. Harrye Hmaon replied idsntify. Ne aced ins ^liwaMa Drainage Polley regains that CM first dweloper design and identity all eM land needed for tM Duin but that developer only has to actually provide the land which Ss needed to support the proposed project. He said that staff was neaawsndinq full-width conatrudlon of Niller 7lvmue from 6LSwanda kvsnue. He felt that wa• consLsUnt with approval of other project• within tM City for the uke of safety and conwnlence. He rtated that condielons require ot[-senet SmprovemsnU on Kiwanda Aosnus to Niller Avenue and staff feels the lnteraeetlon must M eseenatrueted bwauw work 1s neWad under the 1nGrcMnge in tM nortMUt quadrant to wM tM tw streets funce ion properly. He coasrntsd that q. S. Home la the largsK pnpsrty holder in that quadrant and M [sit SC mould W appeopslaN for rhea to do the lmproveernG. Nr. Hanson felt tDat if tM developer Can just lly that tM 51.3 million inenaN !n costs between tM erlginai and rwLSd master drainage plans Ls unnsoeuary, than L flealbillty in tM condition as written to allow tM de.eloper to pay less. Hs sold St world M addrssud during the plan rwirion prxns., Nr. culler aaggested tM! it tM Commisslon wished to adopt LM ruolutlons of denial [or Che project, iney .ad • condition CML tM prejeet does not mqG minimum overage lot sin a required by tM LtlwanM 8pecifio Plan. xs said that condition should W added becauq tM Coswlnlon nod not taken action on amending the spaelfia plan. Planning Commiuion N1nuNS -73- OecemMr 17, 1991 Commie•ioner Keleher stated h• w• not eamfortabU in making all of the finding. indicated in the raaolution. Comoiesioner Toletoy fQt some of tM other problem. should W dieeuoed. Cheirman NcNiel stated the C1Cy hu permitted half-eirwt condition. in CN past and generally they cruG pzo6leme. Commi a iorar yQ1Kb uid she knell tM applicant wanted a decteion tonight. She did not feel camfortaDL denying on all LM vaztous Suuu. She asked if it would Da poniDL to deny on only tha luue that the project due not meet the minimum average lot dre of the Btiwanda Specific Plan. Chairman McNLl recommended the project not W danieO on that bole only, 6eesuse it might imply the project wu othetwlu acuptaDle. Coamtu icn•r Chltiu .fated !Mn ware • number of iuuea. she uid she would have difficulty approving the project rithout having the perk site defined so that the iuuu of appropriate aeeue and design could W addrnsed. Cammtuioner Malcher Leif that tM Camtutan had got lvlly dieeuued all of the finding. conGlned In CM proposed uwlution, eueb a the Snappropriate grid stmt pattern, and the finding thae flu architecture all related dolgn element. were inconsiatm! rith the goals and objeeElwa o[ the 6tiwande spectfie Plan. He felt that at the most recent Gsign ravier of the project, the commtctee nod suggested that the entire Comsiulod look at the grid street petiern. Comoluloner Toletoy fall that tM grid pelbrn 1e a ptoblee, a one of tM oDj .Clive of the ttiwanda 9pecitlc Plan !s • wrw111neer Kiwteotpe. He utd on three uparate ocueione tM sheet pattern had Dean dLcueud with U. 3. Home and they Dad indicated they did not haw enough money to redesign the tract. He uid they had aUO dleeuued that tM architecture wu not cone Ltent with tM goal. of the [tiranda [peeifiC Plan ud policies of the Planning Coomleeion. ~~ ' CoomLaloner Helcher thought direction had been given !o tM architect which, if carried through, would nail. the project act~itaDU. coamluloner CDStiu coeeenled that the architect had not aubeltted anvthtng to chow they had followed CM eosnlttee'e uggeetlene. eMiraun McMlel lelt tM staff report utie[aMOtlly dleeueeed the conditions within the test. He uid • kay ruson for Mnial ru the CaM that the tract L not eonLL•Nnt with the current [tiwanda epeci[la Plu Ln wepect to minimum average lot aiu. He uid that •lthdwgh the project had Dun in prouu [or a long lLse, the application was no! conplated until approximately rlx woke ago, a did not trl 1t to D. tM rupone1D111ly o! .toff or the CommLUlon chat tM pmjaM wu !n procue [or ao loop. Be felt the project had been auffieienily dieeuned and he wu eo~torGDle with all of the [lading. Sn the ruolut lone of denial. Pluntnq Commiuion Minute -]Y- December 17, :991 Motion: Moved by NeNiel, earondad by ChLtiear to adopt the resolutions of denial for Environmental Auuament and VutLng Tentative Tract 16311 with modifieatlons to lndicaG the! Che project does not mast minimum average Rot size required by the Etlwanda Specific Plan. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSION6113: CAITIEA, MCN IEL, NELCHEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: CONNISS SONERSe NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -Carried The Planning commLeion receswd from 10:43 p.m. to 10:55 p.m. ~ • . . . 0• - TM development o[ lire St No. Phase II, eonriat Lnq of • 3a,030 square Loot malntena and train facility, a J,a33 square too! training tower, a 3Y0 • faoC pump to enclosure, and an errgency Mlispot on 7.03 acres land In the Minim mpact Heavy Eadustrial oietcict (subarea 9) oR Industrial Area Specit 1a0, located ae the wutAweet eornsr o[ ey Boulevard and Milliken ue - APNt 229-ill-23. Staff sec issuance o! a Negative OeCLta Two Grahn, Auletant Plan presented the etaf! s commlu loner Chula asked w final color re ulectsd Dy the Oea lgn Review committq Lor the roof •1 is oL t alninq tower. Mr. Grahn responded tM three prima ore were alectsdt red, green, and blue. COmmissioner ToLtoy ukad when uy Bout d will b• complstsd to the went to the railroad track. earrys Manson, Senior it Engineer, respond that the tppllcant had submitted an tpplica! to the~railsoad and It eo W u long a a year. Ne said Nillilun eh W opened by next October. Chairman NcEie ned the public hearing. Max Nedi Nolff/Lang/CArlstopher, 10170 roolhlll sou ard, Aanrho Cueamonq toted M wet availabL to answer quatlons. Ctmmi Doer Nelcher wa conwrnsd that the construMion may W br n Lnto two dltlonal phua. Ne commented that eonetruction ears to M been u ay [or • long period o[ time and he feared that phulnq mould eaten ens etruction period even longer. Plano lnq Coomiu ion Nlnvta -33- December 17, 1991 RESOLUTION NO. 91-192 A RESOLOTIOM OE TBE PLANNING CONNISS ION OP THE CITY OF AANCBO CUCAMON011, CALIYORNIA, DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NAP N0. 1{211, A AES I06NTIAL 9UBDIYISION OP 226 SINGLE lAMILY LOTS ON E1.2 ACAES OP LAND NITNSM TR6 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ZN THE NEDION AND IAiI-!ODIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8-1{ AND 4-B DNELLIN6 VNITB PER ACRE, AESPECTZVELY). LOCATED ON T!O EAST SIOt OP ETINANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEPoRE FREENIIY AND NEST O- EAST AVENUi, AHD MARINO lINDINOS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNe 227-231-01, 09, 12, 16, AND 32~ 227-191-15/ 227-151-2{~ AND 227+261-11. • A. Recitals. (i) D.s. Hama Corporation has ti1W an apPllcaClon [or ehe approval of Vaatinq Tentative TraM Map No. 1{111 a descclbed io tM titL o[ Lhi• Resolution. Herelnattez in thi• Mwlutlon, tM aublao! VeKinq Tentative Tract Map zequeat L relerred to ae "CM applleatien." (Si) On April 2• and Esptenber 2S, 1991, CM Planpieq CaasLLsslon o[ the City o! Rancho Ncamonga eonduetW duly noticed pwblle hesrLtge regarding the aampleteneo of tM subieet application. FolleNieg eonolualon of eha latter hearing, tM Planning Coaa~issloD adopted Resolution No. 91-161 denying the application without prejudice. (Lii) TM decLsion nproamiad by uld Flaming Cosuiulon Aeaolution wu timely appeled to the CLty Connell. (iv) Stott aubesquently droned the project application complete on Oceotrer 30, 1991, prior to the hearing on the appal, CMreby null ifyinq the action o! the Planning Coeaalsslon a! SeptsatNr 25, 1991. {v) On the 11tH day of Deeesber 1991• and eeatlsuW to the 17th day of December 1991, tM Planning CoaaalesioR of ihs City et Ranche Cucamonga conducted a duly net1esd public hearing on the application and concluded aai,d hearing on that dots. (vi) All lapel presequieitu prior to LM adoption of ehis Reaolut ion have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, TNEIIE-ORE, it is hereby [aund, deter~lnsd, aM teeolvsd 6y CM Planning Coaeiaeion o! tM City of Ranctw Cueaagnga as tollan~ 1. Thla Coeelulon hereby apsclllcally !lode that all of cM faau ut foKh in tM 14CLtale, PaK A, o[ thin Rewlut lod arm tram aM correct. 2. Bued upn substantial evidence proented eo thL Cammiu ion during the above-redeeenced pub! Se baring on Decewbee 11, and continued eo December 17, 1991, including wr iiun and oul sett sepKe, together with public tptimony, thLa Ce~lulon hereby spelt leslly find[ a tollowe: PLANNING COI4fI SSION 30LUT ION NO. 31-192 TT 1{311 DENIAL - U.S. HOML CORPORATION Deceeber 17, 1991 Page 3 (a) TM applLcation applUa to property generally located uat of Etiwanda Avenue, south oC !Ae Devote Freeway and that o! EaaG Avenw wiih an Etiwanda Avenue frontage of 712 fact, a Dev<re Freeway frontage of 3{B het end an Saat Avenue Croniage of 016 feet on property zoMd Low-Medium RaaidentLal and L pruently unimproved] and (b) TM property to tM north of the eubjeee cite Lncludes •SngL ruidsneea and vacant land and coned Low-Medium and Medium Aaaldeniill (4-e and B-1{ dwelling unlN per acre, zupeetlvely), tM property to the south of that ^iN is mingle fmmily reaidentLl and vacanC and Sa zoned Low-Medium and Medium Msidentiel, the property to tM seat conelet^ oC single family raaidancea and vacant land and ie sonsd Low-MWiua and Medium Rnidantial and City of Fontana. and tM property to tM west la CM Devore Preewry right-ot-way, aingle fully nsidsntial and vacant, and la zoned Low-MWium and Medium Residential) and (<) Tne application eontespLtes tM developsmat o! 226 single tamlly ruidencu wick an average lot else of D,6sS aquas faint and an LnterL deNntion Mein o[ 10.6 acre [or tM purpoN of reeslvlnq dcalnage [or thin project a well a future projects in the SimasOlNe area) aM (d) The project as propoeW v111 require approval of related Etiwandt Specific Plan Amsndaunt 89-03, which could allow lots of a minimum average lot sloe of 9,500 aquae fact in the Low-MWium 14aidential Dlatrict o[ the ttiwuda SpecitLe Plant and (e) TM application as proposed could M autuially detrimental to tM persons and properties Ln the StmediaN vicinity oL tM proposed •iN for tM rusona a follows, (1) TM Tentative Tract Nap a propoee4 does not indicate • letNtsd parnl o! 7.33 ecru oz greater for tM purpose o! a park, which is the minimum requirsrnt o[ tM Wloby Act (a miniw of 3 area of puk pes 1,000 culdenN) and 11aneM Cuesmonga Municipal Code Chapter 16.32, nor dwe tM Tentative Tree! Map rstlarot a eiN ylan design that would •ilow this puk to M expanded on the Cent Lquaue property ut111ae0 as an Lnurlm deNntion basin Ln tM future. Ie addition, tM minlemm 7.37 acre park cite i^ neesuaq to mast tM goals and objectLwe of eM Oeneul Plan in Nrme at location (!M denerQ Plan requires a park e1N la CM block bounded by 6liwanda, tact, aM Nlllu Avenues ud Foothill toulsvard) ud inNnt (the park should M provided at the tine of dweloprne for tM use of citizens in tM Lo•ed1aN area), both of which are conelrtent with tM goaU o[ the Gneral Plan atMl ttiwanda Speei[Le Plan for providing essidsntlal facilit ias to meet the needs of all ssgrnN of tM populaelon for rserutlon, rtlazae ion and eeelalisaklon. (7) The project conesrylatee tM eonrtsuction of a sound attenuation wall along the edge of the gevore Ireavay righc-ot-way, approximaNly 11 to i7 lest high a aruursd at freeway gr~ae, which i• necuury to mieigaN tM eencsrns of exposing people eo poNntUlly dangerous noiu iwsl• In portions of tM project aru. As required Dy eM General Plan, the [eaalbility o! CM wall, 1N Migh0. lxatlon, and eonatruce ion naa yet to M deMsmined mince [ormal approval from Goitrous Ms not Men aecu nd. PLANNING COMNISSION ~ JLUTION No. 31-132 TT 11311 DENIAL - U.9. MOl@ CORPGAATIDN December 17, 1991 Pe9e 3 (3) TM pro}eot contsmpLtu the removal of up to 313 trees on the property, many of which ue Lnititlly identlfled a• in a healthy end thriving condition a identified by • qua11[Ssd and licensed uborist. The application ae proposed dws not include a eoneuxrently proeused TiN Removal Permit nor any epeeific tree replacement quantities of species to mitlgab the loss of up to 313 tress on CM properey. ThL U inconsistent with iM City's Tree Prearvatios Ordinance (RencM Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 19.08), tM goals o! CM 6tiwanda Specific Plan and tM absolute policies of the Dswloparnt Code (AaneM Cucasonga Municipal Code 5aetion 17. DB. DSD.t.E), which require rsplaesrnt o! LWividual trees viih epeeies and quantities of a a,inlsme acceptable level and replusesnt o! ssistlnq windxore o! Blus Gum tucalyptus trees to encwrage CM protection of tM rindbraak systse for reasons of public sa[ety, wind proteetlon, end hislorieal algnificenee. (l) TM Tsntatlw Traci Map and n1atM plans allect a •gzid• local street patbrn, eepeclally !n tM area sough o! Miller awaus, which is inconsUUnt rlih the Aeeidential Dedga Polielu of CM CLty !or providing eusvlllneu streets to psosgie visually inierestiag streetscage (Aencho Neasonga Municipal Cods Section 17.OE.090. c.12 eM ttiwsnda specific Plan Section 5.32.100). (S) TM Tentative Trlrt Nap and n1atW plans Include local eul-druo strsats that ate designed rite awkward s14 yud to rear yard relationships. (S) TM arcAlteetuse end related deslga elesrnts rithin the proposM pro]eet boe,Wariee, a relleetsW in CM application, is not consistent with eM goals and ab]setivea of CM ttiranda apeeilie Plan, which state • pro]ect sMll create or reinforce tM •senw o! eossw,nity identity, avoid the feeling o! aerness or Dlandmo, aM enhance ttiran0a's charactsr.• (7) TM pro]ect deer not east nLaiaue average lot siu u required by iM ttlrarda Specifla llaa. 3. lased upoe tM subatentlal evidence preunted to tnL Cammiseion during tM Woes-relerenced public Haring aM open eM specific findings o[ faces set teeth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Ca~luion Meeby finds and coneludu as tollow~ p) TM tentative [raft le not coadstsne with eM 0emn1 PLn, the ttirenda Spealtio Plan, and CM Developeeat Code/ and (D) TRe design or lmprovernts of CM tentative tract an not consistent wleb CM OeMral Plan, eM teiranda spaoitlo Plan, nor the Developssnt Code) and (e) The deign of ens suhdlvlslon U likely Co cauw eubeuntial envlronMntal deeage and in]ury Co hunaM and wildlile or char nWlcat) ane PLANNING COMMI39ION iOLUTLON NO. 91-192 TT 11311 DPNIAL - 0.... NOlR CORPOMTION Deca~bec 17, 1991 Pigs ~ y (d) The evidenw presented to thU Caer~iuinn hu identi[lad aubatantial potential adwrp envisonmenGl Ktente o[ the appiied [or development. {. Basal upon GM tindinpa and eonolurione tet [orth in paragraphs 1, 1, and 3 above, this Comeiulon Rereby dwiee tM application. 5. The seeretary to thin Coo•luio0 atoll eertily to tM adoption of thin Revelation. APPROVeD AND 11DOPTtD TItIe 17TB Oat OP DeCelOp 1991. PLANNYNO COIDfislIO11 OP Tea CSTT OP 10111C80 COCAI10116A I, Brad Buller, searetaq of tM Plamiop Cn~laaial o! tM Clty of Naneno Cueaeonga, do Mreby eertity tMt !M tmregelnp Pewlutioe raa duly and regularly introduced, paaaed, and adopted by the Plaaninp Co~laeion of the Ciey of Raneho Cuea~oega, ae • rpulu oeeting o! the Planning Caanlaaion held on the 17tH day et Deeaarler 1991, by Lhe [ellorinq wtrto-rite AYeat CDIOReflIOMnlat CNITIEh, MCNILL, 104~.1~, TOL31VYr vALLETTE ~ass~ aaalsslastss~ NONL uasnr~ oaalssttsslss~ None RESOLOTION NO. 91-193 .~ AElOLOTZOII OT TRt PLANNING COiD1I80ION 07 THE CITY OP AANC80 COCAIMNIGAr C7ILIPORII2A, OEMYIMG T~ OsaICN RNIEN Ol VE8TIE0 TENTATIVE TAACT 110. 31211r THE DEEION REVIEM O- A RtEIDEIiTIAL EOaDIVI8IOM O/ 226 EINOLE YAMILY LOSE Oa 81.2 ACAEE O- LaND NITBIN Tet ETINANDA EPECIIIC PLAN IN rNa 7abiDM AND IAN-7RDION REEIOEIITIAL D1aTRICTa (e-31 AND 4-8 ONELLZNO ONITE PER ACRt, REaPECTLVELYI. LOGTEO ON THE EAST FIDE O1 ETINAEDA AVENDE, EOOTA OP Tffi OEVORE lREENAY AIID NEST OP EAST AVENOEr AMD MAEIEO YIEDIMOE LE SUPPORT THEAEOY - APNr 227-231-O1, 09r 12r 16, AlID 327 227-191-157 227-181-217 AMD 227-261-11. A. Recital. r (1) D.s. Nome Corporation hae filed an application for the approval of eha daaign revier of gearing hntatiw Tract Map ao. 11211 as daaeribed In the title of tRle Rawluilon. Maraloaftar in LRIa MwlutLOe, cM eubjwt Oeelge Roiw ragueet la referred to as RM applleatlon.• (il) On April 21 ana Eeptenbar 29, 1991r tM Plarninq Coawiuioo of eM clcy of RaneRO ~beamonga condaetad duly neticaA pnbiie Haring. regarding tM eompleteneea of eM aubjaet application. -ollolrinq cenCluaioa of tM letter Haring, tM Planning Coaataaloa adoplad 1U Raaelution w. 91-111 denying the applleAtiOa w1LROUt pzajndlH. (ill) TM daelaioo zapreawted by raid Dlamleg Cc~laalon Meolutlon was timely appealed to tM City Council. (iv) Etatf eubaaquantly daeaad tM projaat applieatlen compleu an October 30, 1991, Drier to the heasiaq o0 tM appaalr thereby Oulllfyinq the action of tM Flaming Co~laalon of Eaptambar 1E, 1911. (v) On eha 11th day o! Dacaebar 1911• aad conelnuad to the 17th day of December 1991, eM Planning Co~Laalal of the City of Eancho Cucamonga conducted • duly lwtlrad publlo hearing on tM appllcatlen and concluded eald hearing on that data. (vl) All legal praeeguiaitea prior to tM adoption o! thin Mwlution haoa oeeusrad. 8. 8El91YfS~• NON: T~AEIOEE~ It la Mreby [Dandy datasminad. and rawlvad by Ua PLnnlnq Caeeflealan o! tM Clty et EaadhO Cucamonga u 1o11oM1 1. Thla Co~iaaion Mraby apaoltiaally elnda that all of tM facts eat forth In tM 14oitala, Pazt A, of thin Raaolutlon asa tsua aM correct. 2. EaaaA upon aubaeantial e.i4nce pnaantad to tAl• Commlu ton during the above-safasanead publio haerlnq on Daeaabar 11, 1991, Lnc lad ing written and oral atilt raporta, togetMS with public teat lawny, this caomlulon hereby apaoiticdly Linda a tolloral PLANNING CVMMI95ION IOLUTION NO. 91-i93 DR TT 11231 DHMIAL - D.S. HOIR CORPORATION DscsmDer 17, 1991 Page 2 r (a) The application applies to property generally located east of 6tiwanda Awnue, south of the Devore freeway and west of EaK Avenue with an Etiwanda Avenue frontage of 712 feat, a Dwors Freeway frontage of 318 tNC and an Eut Avenue frontage of 111 1Nt on property zoned Low-Medium Ruidentlal and i• presently unimprovs0~ and (D) The property to tM north of tW aubjsM •iG i• eingl• family residential and vaeane and zoned Low-Medium and Medium Reddential (6-S and 8-31 dwe111nq unite par acre, reepez2lvely), tM property to the south of tRat •ite L single tsmily residences and asrani and le zoned Les-Medium RuLdentLl, LW property to tM east consists of single taily residence and vacant land and ie zoned Low-NSdius Residential and City of loniana, and tRe progrty to LM west La •Lngle [oily reeidentLl and vacant and L zoned Low- Medium reeidsnlSalj arW (e) The application eontemplaba tM development o[ 226 single family resideeee rich an avenge lot sin of a, 6aa aquae feel, and an interim detention beln o! 10.6 acres for tM purpoe oL rneivinq drainage for Chia project a wll a futon projects !n the i~ealata ana) and (d) TM project as proposed will sequLn approval of related 6LSwanda Specific Plen AernOrnt 09-03, wesah wonld allw lots of • minimum average lot s1a of 8,500 equate [set in !M Low-MShcy bddential Diettict of the Itiwanda specific Plan) and (e) The application ss proposed would W materially detrimental to the persona and propert US in tM lasdlaW aLelnlty et LM proposed site [or the reasons a fallows~ (1) The Tentative Tract Map a propeaee does not indicate a lettered peel of 2.33 scram or gretu fer tM Purpose of a park, which is the slnlmum rsquhawnt of lM Quimby AM (^ miolaum of 3 acres of park per 1,000 reidetm) and Rancbq Cucamonga Nunieipal Codm chapter 16.32, nor deem lM Tmnlalio TYaet Map ntleet • silo plan deign that would allow thL park to W empandad on the eonelquaua propmrty utilised a an interim detention basin in eM futon. 2n addi<lon, tM minis)o 2.33 acre park uu La nmeuaary to mssN: then gwls and abjmct Lvam of tM Oaneral Plan !n terms of Location (tM dmnaral plan requina • park altm Sa tM block bounded by ttlwanda, taml, and Miller Avenue and Poathlll teuleeard) aM intent (the park should M pranidsd at CM time o! devalopNnt tot tM uam of citizens in then LmmWiate are), boon o! wnlcn um conalaeant rite LM goals of cW Gneeal Plan and ttiwanda dpwl[la -lan for prOVldinq residantlal tacilltiee Go met eM needs et all aagmant• of tM populatioe tot rneaatlon, meet ion and sociallzatign. (2) TM project eontawplate CM eonstsvetion of • sound attanetlon wall along then edge of tM Devon freeway right-o[-way, appsoriaataly 11 to 17 lmmt high a mmuurad at trmaway gadm, which is necusary to sdeigate tM eonoena o! eRpodnq psoplm to potmntially dangerous note levels ln' portions of ehm project area. At rpulra0 by CM General Plan, the Leiblllty of !M wall, ila Might, lxatlon, and cenatruct ion Ra• yet to W 4etsrmLned since toesal approval tram Glesana Ma not Wen secured. PLANM ING COlriI53ION ]LL'T ION NO. 9i-133 DR TT 16231 DENIAL - 0. 9. MOlg mRPORAT ION DeoeaDet 17, 3991 Page 3 (3) The project contemplates the removal of up to 213 tteea on the property, many of which era initially Ldentified as in a healthy and thriving condition as identified by a goal itial and licensed arborlst. The application as proposed does not include a concurrently procueal TtN Removal Permit nor any specific tree replacement quantitiwe oz species to mitigaN tM loaa of up to 213 trees on the property. Thle U lncanaietent with the Clty'e Tree Pzearrvation Ordinance (Rtnehe Ncamonga Municipal Code Chapter 19.68), the goal^ oL tM 6t iwanda 9pecif lc Plan, and the abeolub policiu oC the Development Code (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.08.050.8.8), whim require replacement of individual trees with epeeiu and quantLtlea of a minimum aceeptaDle level and replacement of exLtinq windrows of Elue cum 6uulyptue trNe to encourage the protection of the windbreak ayat® for reaecne of public saUty, rind pxoiecilon, and hLtorical aignlfiean<e. (aj The Tentative Tract Nap and plated. plane-pfLet a "grid" lcul street pattern, eapeelally in LM asw south of Miller Avenw, which ie SnconeLteM ~ritb the 14eidenLial Design POlieiee ot, the ,Ciey for providing curvilinear streets to yromote visually intearKlnq etreeteeapee (Rancho Cucamonga Mdnlelpal Code Section 1T.Oe.090.C.1] and Etiwanda Epeelf is Plan Section 5.32.i00j. - (S)'9e :; ,TM TsntatiW Tract Map and zelaEal plane include local eul-de-sae streete'LfYat are dolgnal with arbard Bide yard to par yard relatlonshipe. (6) Thm architecture and platal design elements within the proposal project boundasio, am ratlsctal in the appliea~lon, L not consieGnt with the gwla and ob7ectivu of the RelraaWa epemitic Plan, whim aeato • project snail create or seintoree the •waae of eoassunity Ldsnt ity, avoid the feeling o[ sawneu or blandneu, and enlunce Etlrenda'^ characur.^ (7) TRe project dwe not mast m1nLm~m areY~ge lot sip am requlral by the Etiwandm Epwific Plan. ~;~ ylv- 3. Basal upon •the substantial evidenoe pteNntal to thin Cosimission during the above-rsLepncal public hearing and upoe the-specific findings of taste ut Lorth !n paragraphs 1 and 2 above, tnia Ca~inlon A,~eby finds and concludes a Lollors~ ., (a) That the proposal project le net,conefiteni with tM ob]eetiws o! the gewral Plan( aM Ib) Tha! CM proposed duinn la not is accord with the objectives o[ thm Etiranda Epscltlc Plan and Developrnt Code nor the purposes of the district in whieA the ^LCS Se lomatal~ and • (c) Thae the proposed design Se not in ce~pliancm with ucn o[ the applicable pravlalons of CM Etiwanda 6pecitia -lan aM DsvHopmenc Cade and (Q) That the proposal dglgn, togetMr with the cordit tons applicable thereto, will W dstrlmsntal to LM public hsalth, sa (sty, antl wel[are and maGrLlly Lnjurlou^ to proportlo or improvmnu in the vlc Lnlty. PLANNING COMMISSION SOLUTION NO. 91-133 DR TT 16711 DENIAL - U. 3. HOME CORPORATION December 17, 1991 Page { d. Baaad upon the tlndinga and conelualona eat Corth !n pazagzapha 1, 2, and 3 above, thl^ CcaaeLalon hereby daniu eha appilcation. 5. Tha 9acratary to thi^ CoaaeLaion shall artily to tM adoytion o! thin Aaaolutlon. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OP DECElBER 1991. PLANIIIN6 CONEIEEION O? THE CITY O/ RANCBO CDCANONOA BY i, Brad aullar, Eacr~tary of the PlanDlnq Cae.laaion of tW City of Rancho Neamonga, do Mraby eartlty Ghat tM foeagolip Raawlutlon was duly aM raqularly introduced, paaaW, and adopeW by CM /laneleq caslsalon of the City o! Rancho aeaannga, at • regular neetinq of LM Plaeninq Com.iaelon bald on the 17th day o[ Deceebes 1991, by tM tolloriny rote-to-wlt~ AYES, COMMSEEIONERi~ CHITIEA, MCT7IEL, NELCI~R, 'PDLSTOY, VALLETTE Noss: caalaaxaNSNS~ NoNs Asa:~/r~ caalsslossRS~ NoNs RESOLDTZON N0. 92-07 A AESOLDTIDN OT TF6 PLANNING COMMISSION O[ TIR CITY OP RANCRO CDCAMONCa, CALIFORNIA, RHCOMMENDIN6 DENIAL 07 ETINaRDA SPECS tIC PLAN ANERDMENT 39-03, A AEgO63T TO Mfl;ND CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NITRIN TqE ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN, AN6 MM2Nd FINDINGS IN SDPPORT TRERSOt. A- Rec itale. (i) U. S. Roma Corporation hae filed an application for 6tiwanda Speeif is PLn Amendment No. 89-03 a deecribad in the title of thle Auolution. gerelnaltw Ln tAia MwlutLon, the eubiect Etiwwda spec i[ic Plan Amendment La roferred to a 'tM appllutLOn.• (ii) On December 13, and coot inued to December 17, 1991, tM pllnninq Coomiuicn of the City of Ranchc Ncamanga conduMW a duly noticed public hearing on tM application. The Planning Cooslulon continued tM application to January 8, 3991. - (iii) On January 8, 1991, the P1aDnip Coalaelon of tM City o[' Rancho CLCamonga conducCW • duly noticed public Marlnq on ehs application and concluded acid hearfhq on this data. TM Planning Coslulon dlrscted that • Resolution of Danfal M prepared for tM January 11, 1991, meeting. liV) all lpal psslrequleites prior to CM adeptlon of thL Maolution have occurred. B. Ruolution. f NOWT TAEAEFORE, ~~ ie hereby found, deterslned, and sseoloed by the Plenninq Co®SU ion of tr,hi~e~~Clty of Rancho Ncamonga a tollgn~ 1. This CoarbelROn Mrsby spwitlcally [LMIa tMt all of the [acts ut forth in the RscltaL,' part A, of thin Mwlution aro true aM correct. 1. RaaW uyon~ ssbstantlal wldanee pzswntab to ehla Cowlesion during tM aboFe-rotaiidacEld public MatLpa oo Daea~sy 17, 1991, and aanuary e, 1997, lnclvdlnq~ Writtw and oral aLtt reports, together with public test laony, this Coe~lsslon Mreby apecltlcaUy !lade as tmllweE '(a~ TM application applin to all propsrtlu located within the Low Medlud and NWIu~ Residential Dawleparnt Districts Wlthln the area governed by the Etiwanda Epwitic Plan. (b) Tha Oeveloplrnt Coda psrelts detavhsd single family residences only ut iliainq the optional dweloprnt atwdards, as currently doe^ tM Etlwanda Specific Plan. (e) Tha arndant dwa conflict with tM goaU and' polic Ue oe the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Plan for ruaona a tollawn r PLANNING COHH ISSIOh ,SOLUTION NO. >?-G^ tSPA 89-03 - V.S. HOtQ CORPORATION January 22, 1992 Page 2 1) TM amendment to allow single family reaidsncea in [he Ned ium Aeeldutlal zone under basic rtandarde would reduce the amount of Gammon open apace within individual prosacts, which la SnconaLUnt with eM policy for providing ample usable open space within eM Bpac Ltic Plan Aru/ and 2) TM amendment would discourage YM potutial toz prajeet "elusterinq• for the yuzpou o! pruazvat ion of span eyacei and 3) The amendment mould not support tM atiwanda 9pecitic PLn policy o[ crgtlnq • 'country or coral atmoephere• by integrating natural area with urban eras ehrough ^ ryetr of linear open epaeu. (d) This aaMndmrt rill ceduee tM incutive to utilise eM Optional Development Btandarde dw to the proposed ssmller miniana average lot size and thus allot higher densities for •eonvestioul• projects utill:lnq Buie Dewloprnt 3landarde !n tM Law Media. aM Medium Msldential DLeriMa of the st iwanda Bpecific Plu which conesndicte tM general intent of the plu for providing a generally more rural atdoepMre aM etrengtMninq !M senp of community identity within tM Etiranda area. (e) The arndrnt does not lake into eoneider6lon other LnterzelatW development elandards (lot Beverage, setWcke, ate.( which may directly influence tM character of pro~eMS ud reduce the ability to meet the basic gosh and obiectlves of the ttiranda spelflc Plan ud the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substutitl evidences preNneM to ihi^ CorLeion during the above-refersaced publla Marings uId apes the eprlfic findings of Lact^ rt forth in paragraphs 1 a~W 2 above, thin cosledon hereby finds and coneludu a followa~ la) That tM peopoeed application dwe not promote tM goals and policies of tM atiraMa Bpw!!ic Plu) and (b) TMt eM proposed erndrnt reuld have slgnlficant impacts cn the enviroemeat or tM wrtoundlnq propertieq and (et That tM proposed arndrn! Ls not in conformance with the Gneral Plan and Btiwanda Bpecif is Plu. 6. Bub upon tM findings and conclueione eat forth in Dazagrapha 1, ], and 3 above, chic Caswlnion Mreby denies tM application. S. The Becrotary. to this Commiulon atoll certify to tM adoption of ihis ReeoluL}on. PLANNING CONM288ION R ,UT LON NO. 3.-"." E BPA 89-03 - U.S. NOME CORPOAATION January 22, 1992 Pogo 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND OAY OP JANOAAY 1992. PLANNING COlMISSION OF THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coa~iulon of tM clty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby eertlfy roar the foregoing Aewlut Lon Mu duly and regularly introduced, paeaed, and adopted ny tee Plaminq Casieaion of the City of Rancho Ncamonga, ak a [eqular maetlnq of the Planning Caaeiaaion Mld on the 22nd dey o! January 1992, by the follorlnq vote-to-wits AY68: CONNI9DIONiRD~ CHITZEA, NL27IEL, MEI.C7~R, TOISTOY, V*rr~v NOE9t COMMI9EIONLADt NONE ABSENT: COipI99IONiA9~ NONE ... _ _ "j i r! ;~ ~oZ ~~~~ / %••••• Equestrian Trails ~' Bike Lane* or Bike Route* (On Pavement Shoulder) ~~. Bike Path (In Parkway) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan • Consult Trail Implementation Plan title figure COMMUNITY 518 TRAILS i c~ ~ zW Q ~ F- 1~ ~ Q ~aa ^2 ~ZJa Q 6 ~ 8 & W 8 i J .`~ 8 w Y zz t S i~~{aa 2~$ £a~€3$~~+ ~~~~S~Fg yy Me g E, x a f~SaaY $ 42 ~sy? es~~'a~- j{z E2p {s e$y~ ~~ 4ex y3~ ~ly Y~jS`^5H y5Fy~5~'eB ny'f SS'n9'Li ByZgGaS ~• 9Gy itl AC2~ 3 ~2~~' ~€a ~S.~f ~SSa ~gE. ~S~ee~~~ ~~~`i~~~ f~2~~~d§~ ~r-~_.E~ gg gE ~qq3p St ~~8,3 )~~• °s a U U ! e a s e LL ` O ~ 2 r g U ~~ ~~~ LJ 1 ~ ! (o -b o. rs a~ £' ~ p a B o m J N _ F ~%i~BE &2 E~E ~F B Bb~t=~Sf U ~ M i x ~ Z W Z Z a FF~:« e~ ~_€Vg~s~ ,Pn?4. n ~ Q . °sva gE-3 a@$ddm~ ~~'aLSi y - ~ , ~~7 0. W U 2 s 5 ? w N y w '3 O z ~ m ~ w o as ~ ~ so = ~ z ~' F 0 Qa~ rLL w ~ a a g a ~~ r ~ F"~Q ~ OZ w w ¢ w ~ w Y ~~ e W ~ ¢ fr S u m a n ¢~ 7 a U ~ ~W_ 1i 0 ~ + ~ C f 180 Equestrian Trails Bike Lane' or Bike Route• (On Pavement Shoulder) ~.:;mm.:, Hike Path (In Parkway) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan OMMUNITY RAILS ~oz Chaffey Joint Union High School f~istrict 2n W of F'~pTH 3Tn EET. ONTFFIO CAUF09MA 9" /o2~'d59 ~i:m naE~P51 ~ PA{ ~ i'4. 99.~~ ~6r. aURERINTF.NDENT Op SCHOOLS .iBP^- irry.i.. March 9, 7992 ASSnf.IATE SUGF.FiHTENDENT IHSrRUCTION JPYo n M.l'!'.SC" ASEIETgNT SUFERINCENCENT PEpSONNfIr Jack Lam, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 97730 Dear Jack: eD4RC NEM°_ERS^ 4u Ui 7 I+ ClTyppp ACF!0 ~lin;}~.r;G t .r,~ ;;;:;y A fAAR i 2 1552 tr 7f8f9rfOrllllZfa2i3fg, +F cc: ~-~. V~iO ~~ ~j ~~ 0'j It I know that you and the Rancho Chy Council Members are prepared to take action to allow Chaffey Joint Union High School District to pain access to the property north of Rancho Cucamonga High School in order to develop Lark Drive. ?he purpose of this letter is to emphasize the imperative need to move forward with the project in order to connect the underground utilities as well as to have access to the school in September, 1992. Time is ueDDming a concern as we move toward final phases of development. Water, telephones and storm drains must be completed before the road can be built and the school cannot open without these requirements being completed and inspected. With an expected 1450 students and a compliment of teachers and support staff prepared to invade that facility in September, I urge the City to act as promptly as possible and I pledge Chaffey District's cooperation in assisting in every way possible. Sincerely, i %~ ~ j~; Dean E. Smothers Superintendent Irh SCHOOLS .111/i,141nf.I~A~[F~i.Jllli.~~iin i~lll •~~,. i~f'/. n.. i;n1 ~~. .. i~. ~,i .a..~...~ czTY covwclL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC NEARING CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC P.I GHT-OF-WAY FOk LARK DRIVE Date and Time: Wednesday, March 18, 1992, 7:00 p,m. Place: Civic Center Council Chamhere 10500 Civic center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 5173C AA PEAAANCES CITY OF RAIJCHO ^_UCAlfONGA CITY COUNCIL DENNIS L. STOUT, MAYOR WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER, COUNCILMEMBEA CHARLES HUQUET~ COUNCILMEMEF.R DIANE WILLIAME~ COUNCILMEMBEA JACK LAN., CITY MANAGER JAMES L. MARI(MAN~ CITY ATTOAN'eY CEBRA J. ADAMS CITY CLEAR City Council Meeting Items GS and G2 Eminent Domain far Lark Drive March 19, 1992 r MAYOR STOUT: Mc. Lam, did you have an anneunceme nt? MR. LAM: Yes air. There has been a request for a continu at io.: for Items 1 and 2 under Public Hearings, that's G1 and 2, it's concerning the Lark ^rive issue. We'd like to have that moved forward to continue it to the April first meeting, please. MAYOR STOUT: Alright. At this time I will call Items G1 and 2 far the ospoaes of entertaining a motion for continuance. MR. LAM: And Mr. Mayor we ace required to open the public hearing and the r. continue it. MAYOR STOUT: At this time i will open the public hearing with respect to Item 1, which is cone ideration of eminent domain action to acquire public right-of-way for Lark Drive from its existing easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue, that's a new street that will be directly adjacent to the Aa nc ho Cucamonga High School, and Ztem 2, consideration of eminent domain action to acquire public right-o£-way for bark Drive from its existing easterly terminus to Rochester Averv.a and the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Roc heater Avenue. This time the public hearing Se open on both of those items. It's my underatandirg that the City staff, as well as the two interested landowners, are consenting or requesting a continuance at this time, ie that correct? MR. LAM: That's correct, and the purpose of the continuation is that we have some confidence that some amicable agreement can be reached prior to Apr i.1 fire[. MAYOR STOUT: Air fight, unless I hear any objection, either from the public or from the Cou nc ii, at. this time i would entertain a motion to continue both [nose items to nu r' next reyu lar Ly echedu led meeting which will be on April first. MR. LAM: Correct. CCUNCI LME M9ER ALEEANDER: Go moved. 2 City council Meeting Items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain for Lazk Drive March 39, 1992 0 MAYOR 3TOJT: Alright, seeing no objection there's been a motion by Councilmember Alexander. Is there a second? COJNCILNEHBER WILLIAMS: Second. MAYOR STOUT: Second by Wiliiame. Indicate your voted please. CITY CLERK: Hot ion carried cnanimously, 6-0-1, Wright absent. MAYOA STOUT: Alright, the public hearings on both of those Lteme is continued for hearing on April first of Chia year. 3 MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION FAXED TO US TODAY, MARCH 18, 1992, REGARDING I. 1. LEAGUE BOUNDARIES. ~_ i l HAR-17-92 TU8 16(32 C"fY OF ONTAR!0 - ADM:N FflX 4U, 71439!I;go~ P.Gl _ o~yTAR~~ 4 j :. C I T Y O F y ,~.,~, O~ T A RrI O 3^os EAS+"6'STREE r,cwic CBN'8A ONTARIO ^'4a~~~i°~ CALIFOF NIA 81?61~<'~98 p'4)998-1151 rcnnn> PA% Q14j 391.2567 ('714) 986-1151, Ext. 4880 .SAVES o rq(~.a~.D March 17, 1992 .NlGlaf! 5 O'CONNCR w,n urrvvv FA'/' Mv6%5 pAS~B'„o Mnn f+'f+ L`E'.OR~S `_ 4R'Efi 3~R". G.~C onca+ d'a ~: BG~: 'h~ a'SJ %ROFOS Tp; ' FAX TRAHeMITTAL ~ CI,~`Y NANAOER FOA CMa4lE5L NILHIS°R /i'dsk 4F NA~bT p:$TRIBUTION TO ALL CITY COONCIL MBNBERS ~n :•oaw FAOM: COONCILNAtI XENNfi TH P, WATERS p is lea Ln R~vereitl a Courty @uitchkoarC z o., Bann:.ng 922-1295 922-0445 eeauTOnt 845-1171 845-8483 Blythe (679 922-61fi1 (619) 922-4938 callmeea 795-9801 795-4399 Ce thetlral City (619) 324-8388 (619) 324-d816 Coachella (619) 398-7502 (619) 398-8117 Corona 736-2201 776-2399 peeert Hat springs (619) 329-6411 (619) 751-3523 Hemet 658-9411 765-2337 Indian welie (619) 346-2485 (619) 346-0407 indlo (639) 347-6570 (61i~ 3q2-6556 LeQuinta (619) 564-22g6 (619; 564-5617 Lnke Li ¢].nore 674-7124 67q~-2392 Mo r¢no Vailey 243-3000 247-3009 Norco 735-3900 272-8437 Palm pees rt (619) 346-0611 (619) 340-0574 Palm springe (619 323-8201 (619) 323-7701 Berrie 943-6100 657-7971 Ra ntho Mirage (619) 324-4613 (639) 324-9830 Alver4lde 7A2-5312 369-0548 San JacLnto 654-7337 d54-9896 Tamec~ln 694-1989 69d-1999 5~4~x san Be n rd ino caupty Adelanto (619) 246-8606 (619) 246-Bg21 Apple Volley (6191 240-7000 (619 247-3885 Bar scow (614) 256-3531 (619) 256-1750 Biq Bear La;~e 866-5831 866-6765 Chino 627-7577 591-6829 Colton 37U-5099 370-3159 Fontana 350-7600 350-6617 Grand Terr are 824-5571 783-7629 Hesperia (619) 9d7-SD00 (619) 9d9-7013 Mlghlnnd e6d-6861 862-3180 Lome L7nda 796-2531 799-2890 Montclair 626-8571 621.1584 Need) ne (619( 726-2113 (619 32Ca-4349 Rancho Cucamonga 989-1851 987-6499 Redlands 798-7531 798-7670 Rla lto 870-2525 820-2527 san 8erna rd ino 304-5211 384-5641 Twenty-Nine pa lma (639) 367-6799 (610) 367-4890 Opl and 982-1352 987-0798 Vlctorville (619) 245-397.3 (619) 245-7297 ~. ~_ MAR-17-a? TUE i8!33 C!?Y Of ONTARIO - ADMIN BAR NC. X145910692 O~YA!?~O ' ~, e• a C I T Y O lE'' ~ ~:u ~ ~-;° [3 I`r' 'r .~ R'Y Q .Ja EA ST"3"5'.REC T, CIVIC CENTEN ONTARIO ~, ~~+e. GFLIGO RN!A B'76F4196 17141986-'16' FAX (714) 3Bi-2567 ur~- N:p N. lt+/ ,~,b w. dCVi Ja'~. 'a..i. u.r rw;l~' March 9, 1992 M~~C'r+Pil E OCOIJNGR on w~apv 7E LQR16c gi7ERBl117h', GdC -w ca. GINRIE$'. Mfhi6ER .e; m„v Tn ak Force Committee Membero Tnland Smpira Division League oP calitornin cities Dear Members; i read with great concern the proposal to further fractional ire the districts of the Snland Empire region. With the many agencies and associaClons already in existence; i.e., SLAG, AQMD, county Transportation Commissions, wateY quality boards, the League of California Cities, COC~n, County SupoYVisoz Associations, mini-COG~e, etc., etc „ an effort heeds to be taken to consolidate the many organizations and regional interest groups rather than create further divisions. Riverside and san Bernardina county have common Inland Empire interests. p~@s® Kees our diu~14L toaet~igy. Thank you for your consideration. sincerely, CITY OF ONTARIO KENNETH P. WATERS councilman CAF,-li-0i T'~Je ?@'33 C1?'; OF Cf+TA(?10 - ADMIN FA8 40, 7143910892 P. 03 Council Member Gary Pitts City Of Yucaipa 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard Yucaipa, CA 92399 City Manager Joseph P. Guzzetta City Of Hemet 450 E. Latham Avenue Hemet, CA 92343 Mayor ayron Matteson City eP Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terraco, CA 92324 City Manager Gerald F. Johnson C1ty of Rialto 15C South Palm Avenue Rialto, CA 92776 League of Ca liPurnla Citles 602 E86t Huntington Drive, 9uitB C MonroVie, CA 91016 Attent lan: Ms. Him Chudoba Council Member Gary Soyies CSty oP Fontana 6353 6lerra Avenue Fontana, CA 92735 Council Member Bill FYanklin City of Corona 815 West Sixth 6treet Corcna, CA 91720 Mayor Richard S. Kelly City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Council Member W1111am Arestein City of Indian Wells a4-950 Eldorado Arive Indian Wells, CA 92260 C®MFIDFNTWI. -~--~----~- ---~ ----~- crr`<"ilr [c,~~,clloclx~nntovc;~ ~c>~~r_~ro, '` " ~~`~ MEM6RANDLi1Vi c ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~, •~, I, `~~4,,.~ ,:= DATE: March 18, 1992 ~'~° -u-r "~~ '~~ ~',z 'l . _ TD: ' Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ -- -_ --_- ! ~ Jack Lam, AI L'P, City Manager ~ ~ j0 i EROM: Nick Gomez, Communit De e o ~ 7 y v lcpm_n. Oirector ', DY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~ ~ i SU DJ ECT: LARK DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQU ISITiON At the Cnunc it .meeting of Ma rrh 4, 19g~, Counc i? ce rtinued the Eminent Remain action to acquire the right-of-way for Lark Drive from Rochester Avenue, west, to it's present terminus. The City Attorney is working with us to prepare a detailed staff report in response to issues raised at the March 4 meeting. This staff report will be lengthy and will not be ready for Council distribution until Monday, March 16, 1992. The entire process has been further complicated by Mr. Vito Devito Francesco hiring a new attorney to represent him. Our current strateyy is to agree to pay for the Devito property and not require reimbursement in return for DeYi to's agreement not to challenge the condemnation and the immediate possession provision. This will require the William Lyon Company to pay for the cast of acquisition without a provision for reimbursement for right-of-way costs. In addition we must amend Lhe agreement with William Lyon Company that we approved last week. The agreement is recommend to be rescinded at the meeting on March i8, 1992. We wiil prepare a new agreement with William Lyon once the issues with De Vi to have been resolved. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Community Development Girec for RG/WJ O: diw CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 1992 T0; ''ROM: SIIBJ ECT: Jack Lam AICP City Manager Nill tam J. O'Neil, City Engine~rv REQUEST BY THE 811MMKIAN COMP TO DISCUSS THE NIRERY HILL 1+IRf,IECT-ITF}f'K- Mr. Barmak tan will not be appearing before the City Council as requested. Staff Ts negotiating with Mr. Ba nnakian at this time and feel a settlement car. be reached. If negotlatl ons fail, he reserves the right to return at a later date. NJO: dl w >^ CITI' COL NCIL A[~E:\ I~1 March 2F, 1992 - 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Call: Buquct _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright . The Jaffowing Connnl Calendar 1(rms arc espec(rd !o br rouflns and non- confroverrial. The} will br acted upon b) fbr Counti7 of one time without discussian. Ant item ma) be removed br a Councifinember or member aJ the audience Jor discussion. Approval of transfer of the cable television franchise, now held by Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. (dba DCA Cablcvision) to the Marks Group. Continued tram March 18, 1992. RESOLUTON NO. 92-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE ClCY COUNCE.OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORMA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF OW NERSH^' AND CONTROL OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO DCA CABLEVISION-DICKINSON CALIFORNIA-ARIZONA ASSOCIATES, LTD. (DCAA)TO RESPECTIVELY DCA CABLEVISION, A CALIFORNIA GENERA!, PARTNERSHIP .4ND MARKS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. This Is rbr Nmr and place for fbr genera! public m addr<rs fhe Clty Council. ,Smle law prohibits lba Clry Connell from addrersfng an) Issue no( previously Included an fhe Agenda. The Clry Council mar rrtrlvr (rrNmonr and trf fbe matter /or o subreguenf mnNng. Comments a re to be Hmind fo Jlve minures per lndi vidua 1. City Council Agenda March 2E, ]992 ~ Pagc 2 n enrnrrosnec.rT /, Debra J. Adoms, Ciry Clerk of fhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby eertif)• that a true, accarofe cop? of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 23, 1992, seventy-Iwo (72) hours prior fo fhe melting per Government Code 54953 a! JO500 Civic Center Drive, - - -- -- CIT7-OF'RASCH(Il'l'C.-1MO\C7A STAFF REPORT ,~.,~~ ~ ~~; ~~ DATE: March 26, 1992 7Q Mayor and Members of the Ciry Council Jack Lam, AICP, Clry Manager j FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: [•.r'vtctDEC+r•TiON TO Ap~r1 R aYlfrlr2tJ ppanvn 'rner` coo OF O<°ROR~IP 'I sND GONTRO OF •AB T FVISION FRnf ~ HISF A ,R FAtEIvT PREVfOLSD' ~, C-AANTFIITO DCA R Ciry Council approve Resolution transferring ownership and control of the cable television franchise agreement previously granted to DCA Cablevlsion -Dickinson California-Arizona Associates to (DCAA) respectively DCA Cablevision and Marks and Associates. BACKGROUND On April 77, 1985, Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. (DCA Cablevision) was granted a cable television franchise by the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga. On February 25, 2992, City staff received communication from Dickinson California-Arizona Assocates, Ltd. (DCAA) doing business as DCA Cablevisbn, that they had reached agreement on a refinancing/reorganization proposal that would assura resources to improve service within Rancho Cucamonga On March 18, 1992, City Council continued the item to approve transfer of the cable television franchise now held by Dickinson California•Arizana Associates at the request of the Deputy CIty Attorney, while stall obtained additional information per Section 7.02.170 of Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municpal Code. Under the proposal, the present company, DCAA, will transfer Its assets including Rancho Cucamonga's franchise to a new company, DCA Cablevisbn (a general partnership between DCAA and West Coast Cable partners, a California Ilmitad partnership), whose general partner is Marks and Associates, Inc., a California Corporation. It is staff's understanding that DCAA will retain 90% of equity within the new company. That woultl leave a 20% equity interest applicable to West Coast Cable Partners. West Coast Cable's limited partner is Marks and Associates, Inc., a California Corporation. Marks and Associates will be the managing partner of OCJ~ Pursuant to Section 7.02.100 cf Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Clty had not received documentation from requesting parties prior to City Council approving the cable Transfer of Cable Television Franchise March 26, 1992 Page 2 y franchise transfer. Staff has obtained 90% of the requested information as shown by the attachment. The balance of the information will be forthcoming prior to March 26, 1992 special City Council meeting. In addition, the City will receive a check in the amount of $135,698.26 for delinquent and current franchise fees and grant for proposed PEG system. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that Ciry Council approve the attached Resolution approving transfer of franchise to applicable parties. /FJ~}~ts tfullt~f"~ullY\y-s-ubmia%ed, J ~ ~` erry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF/dja 92-19 Attachment 1~1ARKS 8c ASSOCIATES, INC. Mazch 20, 1992 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Jetry Fulwood 10395 Mahogany Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Dear Jem We are writing you with respect to the proposed itansfer of the cable television franchise, now held by Dickinson California-Arizona Associates. Ltd. ("DCAA"), to a new partnership, DCA Cablevision (the app6can[). Please accept this letter as our formal application for the franchise transfer. DCA Cablevision has been formed to acquire the cable television assets of DCAA. This rew partnership has two general partners, DCAA and West Coast Cable Partners, L.P. ("WCCP'~, and no limited partners. Marks & Associates, Inc. ("MAI") is the Managing General Partner cf WCCP and Mr. William Dickinson is the Managing Ceneml Partner of DCAA. Under the DCA Cablevision partnership agreement, Marks & Associates. Inc., the Managing General Partner of WCCP, will manage the day-today operations of DCA Cablevision. We are sending you the following information you requested: 1. The chart outlines the ownership of the transferee, DCA Cablevision. The manager of the system will be MAI. 2. Affidavits of the officers of MAI (]00 B-t-b and c). 3. Statement from DCAA relating to issues with the City aid the Times Mirror litigation (100 B-I- c). 4. Profotma financial statements of DCAA and DCA Cablevision (as of the closing of the proposed rransacuon) and the most recent audited financial statements of DCAA. Since DCA is a new company, there as yet are no financial statements to be audited (100 B-2). 5. Statement as to degree of completion, plus resume of Clay Graham (100E), together with indication of technical capability. Two Embnrcadero Center, Suite 29J0 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 788-2755 Facsimile: (415) 788-7J11 Mr. Je:ry Fulwood Mazeh 20, 1992 Page 2 y 6. Letter from Fleet Bank regarding their experience with me. DCA Cablevision has been structured rritlt suffirient capi[a; to mrxt the strict :ending guidelines which have been imposed on borrowers by the bardang community. The capital suucture (equity and debt) is sufficient to meet the ongoing operating costs and capital expenditures of DCA Cablevision. Based on the capital smrcture and my reputation as an owner/operator, Fleet Bank has agreed to extend an $1 L,000,000 term loan which meets the needs of llCA Cablevision. 7. References from cities and developers that have worked with me and my companies in the past. 8. Confirmation from the insurmrce broker that the existing insurance policies will be uansferred to DCA Cablevision at the time of the transfer. 9. Counsel for Fleet Bank, Robert A. Eberle, will call your lawyer Mord^y morning to discuss what the Bank can agree to with aspect to "continued operation in case of default", "promise to abide by franchise agreement" and "financial solvency". On behalf of DCA Cablevision, we acknowledge and consent to 7.02.100D of the Ordinance and confirm tha4 upon completion of the transfer of the franchise to DCA Cablevision, DCA Cablevision will pay up to $1,000 to Pilnick & Associates for services tendered to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in evaluating issues associated with transfer of the expp~ing cable television franchise from Dickinson California-Arizona Associates [o DCA CableviL%nn. Very 7MDJR/nm Enclosures ce: Bill Curley (Via Federal Express) 1086(1 Cloud Haven Drive Moreno Valley; CA 92557 Carl Rlnick (Via Fcdeml Express) 5757 Wilshire Slvd., #344 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Two Embarcadero (:enter, Suite 2990 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 7RR•2755 Facsimile: (415) 78R-7911 RF5OUJPION 1J0. 92-077 A RESOLUPION OF TSB CPDY CDiNCIL OF Tim CPIY OF RANCHO QH7+NBa`IGA, CALIfU1WIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFIIt OF RvNIIi- SHIP AND COCIIROL OF THE CABLE I'k7.EUISION FRANCHISE AGREE- MEM' PRES2OUSLY GRAATFD TO DCA CAt3I,EVISIGti-DIQ~IJJN CALIFORAtIA A12IZONA ASSOC7A'CES, LT9. (DC1~A) TO REGPEC- TiVELY PCA CP.BI,EVISION, A CALItUPNIA GINQtAL PARINn"RSHIP AISD MARKS AND ASSOCIATk5, INC. A. tecitals (i) Pursuant to Title 7 - [Cable Television Systems and kYan[3lises) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamorga, California (sometimes hereinafter "GRAN1oR"), has heretofore granted a ca61e television franchise agreement to the entity knv.+n as DicJCinson California Arizona Associates (sometimes "DCAA" or "GRNvTEk7'). 'this Council, pursuant to Title 7 of the ttancho Cuearrorga Municipal Nde, retains jurisdiction to regulate and apprrne, con3itionally approve or disappracie any and all requests of GRANTEE to transfer its ownership aryl control of such franchise. (ii) Pursuant to Section 7.02.100 of Title 7 of the Fancbo Cucamortcja Municipal Code GRANDEE has sukmittad a request for GRANNR's Consent to transfer ownership of the franchise to a new entity knovm as OCA Qblevision, a California General Partnership congx'ised of Dickinson California Arizona Associates, Ltd. and West Coast cable Partners, L. P. arri control to Marks and Associates, Inc. a genera: partner of West Coast Cable Partners L.P. (collectively "trarefereE~s"). (iii) Ibis Council 1•.as receiver], reviewed and considered written and oral evidence w+nich deranstrates that its ~nsent to the requested transfer of arnership aril control will le of benefit to the public and in conformal x~ with the requirements of Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have properly occurred. e. Resolution. NO47, Tt~RF~ORE, the City Council of the City of Pancho Cucamonga does hereby find, consent and resolve as fellers: SECDION 1: In all respects as set forth in th Recitals, Part A, heteinabove. SECPION 2: That the propo.;ed transfer of ownership and control £ran GRAtPi eF to the TRANSI'EREFS is in the best interests of and will benefit the puirlic. The totality of the evidence presented to GRANIUR is satisfactory to demonstrate cnnq>liance with the starldafcl3 established in Section >.02.100 of Title 7 of the Fancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade, as enforced by GRANICR. Resolution No. 92-077 Page 2 SxS'IICN 3: 'Rus consent to and approval of the transfer of wmershi.p and control shall not ce effective until the TPANSFIRII~S have becotre a signa- tory to the existi~ franchise agreeimnt, SECTION 4: 'ibis consent to and approval of the transfer of a,~r:ev r~ship aixl control is further conditioned upon satisfaction of the following terms, representations atd covenvits: 1) 'ltte pcA Cablevision, a California General Partnership accepts and will cznq>ly with all provisions of the existing pCp Cablevision franchise agreement, eYCept those of Section a and Edtibit C, which have been preempted }~y federal law. 2) In settlement of DCA's present non~lianoe with Sections 5.5 and 7.2 (b) of the franchise aoreemertt, I7CA Cablevision, a California General Partnexship will pay or cartse to be paid to the City the stmt of $67,553.00 prior to, but no later than, March 26, 1992. Similtartewsly, IXA Cablevision, a California General Partitec;~liip will pay or cause to be paid to the City: (a) the stns of $34,035.26, to lying the past due franchise fees current to Dece~nther 31, 1991, and (b) the estimated frant3uses due is $34,000.00 for the first quarter of 1992 (erdug March 31, 1992). Ps to the payment of estimated fees; at the time of final calculation of the actual franchise foes the parties shall, upon r_asr-'~le request from either party, prrngtly deliver to the party due the same full amotmt of any wider or overpayment as reflected between the estimated fee paid and the actual sum payable. Furthermtore, pep Cablevision, a California General Partnership agrees to pay the quarterly fratxhise fees on a timely basis which will to no more than forty-five (45) days beyond bfamh 31, June 30, September 30 and Decenber 31. It is agreed that thse payments will resolve all outstanding franchise fee rwnoanepliance issues, pending the outcare of the franchise fee audit. 3) Within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the transfer, DCA Cablevision, a California General Partnership shall furnish to the City proof of. cUVerage of the iru,.urance required by Section 3.5 of the franrlnise agreetmrnt, and concurrently shall provide the security flud required th' Section 3.6 of the franchise agreement. 4) Tne requirement of Section 7.2 (b) for a PFK; aa:ess capital ~uipment grant of one dollar ($1.00) per suL,scz'iber per year shall continue so l.my as the current franchise agreement remains in ford. Upon written demand by the City, 7RANSPII2EE5 shall prort~t_ly deliver to City any such aa.-rued grant funds and any re3uirc~sl acczss ctt,innel capacity, in aa:oxdance with its a~xess cablecasting steeds, as indicated by an acoe,.s opet:at plan approved try the city Council. 'ihe City shall k~+e responsible far operating costs under any approved plan. Resolution No. 92-077 Page 3 y 5) TfU+NSF'3tEES shall Fay to GFANiOR, upon request by GRANNR, the sum of One Rhousard Dollars ($1,000.00). Such monies shall be exclusively used by GRANTOR to assist in the payment of cable consultant fees incuxrad by GRANiDR as a direst result of this request to transfer ownership arrd wntml. 6) All parties agree that arty aarued lot urexperded fords provided order ser.-tion 7.2 (b) may be utilized, at the City's option, not only for aooess cahlecasting equipment and facilities, tut also tc defer part of the co;t of an interconnection system among the City's franchised cable systems so that acoe,s programs can be transmitted simultaneously to all cable subscribers in the City. SECPION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSID, APPROVID, and ADOPPID this 26th day of March, 1992. AY"FS: Alexander, Buguet, Staut, Williams NOES: None A&SE7.T: Wright Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTES'T': Della ~. Pdams, City Clerk I, DI73RA J. ADAMS, CITY Ct,II2K of the City of Rancho Cucangrga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approvad, and adopted b5' the City Council of the City of 1LV~to Cucatrorga, California, at a r'eg~Ilar meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of March, 1992. F~:ecuted this 27th day of March, 1992, at Rancho Cuc`alipllga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk DATE: TO: fiaOM: March 24, 1992 Mayor and Members of the Ciry Council Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager UCIY VN KA:VUriV UUJ:AMUNC;A MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF OWNERSHIP TRANSFER AND CONTROL OF CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT During March 18, 1992 City Council meeting, City Council and the Deputy City Attorney requested additional information. Pursuant to Section 7.02.100 of Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this information was to be provided prior to approving transfer of ownership and control of the cable television franchise agreement previously granted to Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. (DCAA). The attached material represents 90% of requested information. The balance should be forthcoming. Based upon the information received, staff will be recommending approval of the Resolution at the March 26, 1992 City Council meeting. If anyone should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at Ext. 2003. JBF/dja 92-20 cc: Jack Lam, 41CP, City Manager Attachment r MARKS & ASSOCIATES, ItVC. Mazch 20, 1992 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Terry Fulwood 10395 Mahogany Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Dear Jzrry We are writing you with respect to the proposed transfer of the cable telee~ision franchise, now held by Dickinson California-Arimna Associates, Ltd. ("DCAA', to a new partnership, DCA Cablevision (the applicant). Please accept this letter as our formal applicarion for the franchise transfer. DCA Cablevision has been formed to acquire the cable television assets of DCAA. This new partnership has two general partners, DCAA and Wcst Coast Cable Partners, L.P. ("WCCP~, and no limited pattncrs. Marks & Associates, Inc. ("MAI' is the Managing General Partner of WCCP and Mr, William Dickinson is the Managing General Partner of DCAA. Under the DCA Cablevision partnership agreement, Marks & Associates, Inc., the Managing General Partner of WCCP, will manage the day-to-0ay opetadons of DCA Cablevision. We are sending you the following utftnrnadon you requested: 1. The chart outlines the ownership of the transferee, DCA Cablevision. The manager of the system will be MAI. 2. Affidavits of the officers of MAI (100 B-1-b and c). 3. Statement from DCAA relating to issues with the City and Ne Times Mirror liigaion (1008-I- c). 4. Profortna financial statements of DCAA and DCA Cablcvision (as of the closing of the proposed transacdtm) aid the most recent audited fmancial statements of DCAA. Since DCA is a new company, there as yct ate no financial statements to be audited (100 B-2). 5. Statemcnt as to degree of completion, plus resume of Clay Graham (100E), together with indication of technical capability. Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2930 Sao Fnecisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 788.2753 Facsimile: (615) 788-7711 L Mr. Jerry Fulwood March 20, 1992 Page 2 6. Letter from Fleet Bank regarding their experience with me. DCA Cablevision has been stmeturrd with sufficient capital to mcet the strict lending guidelines which have been imposed on borrowers by the banking community. The capital structure (equity and debt) is sufficient to mat the ongoing operating cosec and capital cxpendita~es of DCA Cablevision. Based on the capital s[matue and my reputation as an owner/operetor, Fleet Bank has agnxd to extend an $11,000,000 term loan which meets the nceds of DCA Cablevision. 7. References from cides and developers dta[ have worked wi[h me and my companies in the past. 8. Confimration from the insurance broker that the existing insurance policies will be transferred m DCA Cablevision at the time of the transfer. 9, Counsel for Fleet Bank, Robert A. Eberle, will call your lawyer Monday rooming to diuuss what the Bank can agree to with respect to "continued operation in case of default", "promise m abide 6y franchise agreement" and "financial solvency". Cm behalf of DCA Cablevision, we acknowledge and consent to 7.02.100D of the Chdirmnce and confimr that, upon completion of the rtansfer of the franchise w DCA Cablevision, DCA Cablevision will pay up to 51,000 to Pilnick & Associates for services tendered to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in evaluating issues associated with vansferof the erx~ring cable television franchise Cram Dickinson Calrfomia-Arizona Associates to DCA Cabtevi~lbn. Very Mazks MDJR/nm Enclosures a: Bill Curley (Via Federal Express) 10860 Cloud Haven Drive Moreno Valley, CA 92557 Cazl Pilnick (Via Federal Express) 5757 Wilshire Blvd., M344 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Twa Embarcadero Center, Suite 29J0 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (CIS) 788.2755 Facsimile: (415) 788.7J11 , West Coast Cable Partners, L.P. ("WCCP") and Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. ("DCAA'~ are both general partners of DCA Cablevision ("DCA'~. Marks & Associates, Inc. is the general partner of WCCP and will he responsibie for day-[D-day operations of the Rancho Cucamonga cable systems under a Management Agreement. subject to oversight by the general partners. WCCP and DCAA have a number of limited partners. The officers of Marlys ~ Associates, Inc. are: • Mr. William J. Marks - Chavman • Mr, Iohn M. Duff, Jr. -President • Mr. William J. Mazks, lr. -Vice President, Operations • Mr. A15ert Brach[ -Via President, Finance • Mr. R. Thomas Goodrich -Vice President, Secretary The directors of Marks & Associates are: • Mr. William J. Marks • Mr. ]ohn M. Duff, Jr. • Mr. R. Thomas Goodrich y r ~. fH E i c ®ooi , DUFF ACKERMAN GOODRICH & ASSOCfATES, L. P. ,. Two EmbanxiQero Center, SuRe 2930 San Francesco, CA 94111 415(/88-2?55 (Telephone) 415/788-7311 (Facsimile) FACSIMILE COVER SHEET TO: Jerry Fulwood FROM: John M. Duff, Jr. DATE: Tuesday, March 24, 1992 NUMBER OF PAGES TO BE SENT (INCUJDING THIS COVER SHEET): 2 MESSAGE: .. ail _..,, k .. X002 MARKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. March 2a,199z VIA FACSIIvIQ.E (724) 987499 Mr. 7~7r Faltaood The Cirv of Rancho Cnwmonga 10500 Cs'idta CenterDdve P. O. Box 807 Raacbo C]tramonga, CA 91729 Deaf Mr. Fulwood: Re: 1 T~ .,cfK Of . 1.TV -h;a. ~ ^e ~+tei ' You have tegoested additional itdotmafloa cootemin~ the stnrptne pf DCA Cablevisioa Aa we have mentioned, it is a geoeial pazmeishtpe betwxn DmWnaaa Cal~amia-Arimas Assa~iares, the existiaQ franchisee, and West Quist Cbb Pumas, a mw Limited pmmenhip being formed by Ivfmlcs & Assodaaes, Int. West Caeat Cable Pmmas has the managemem power and authority of du and Mad6 & Associates bag the maaagemene power and atrchatity of West Coast Cabo 1'armas In additi~. Made & Assodatrs will tnmr iato a meog8ement conaact waL the ~ Anshtp. Conaol of the new parmaship is thns vested in the enddes coutmlled by Madcs West Coast Cable Patinas end Marks ~ Associates wAl males an cgany cronmbndon ro the aew PAP CtmriallY 10%) and wt71 coin a Lugo shale of the owauship ofthe venture aver time is order ro compeoxau this Marks' etttiries far their muttibntioas as the Controlling paltica. Please advise to if you Lave aay fiurber gaestioas or eye can provide additiooai infocrosdov. V y yaufy, ohn IvL Doff, Ir. President J~IDIRhtm ct: William 7. Mans Claytm (haham (via facsimile) Two L%mbarcadero Cmtar, Spite 3930 Siw Fnorleco, CA 941u T ekphonr. (415) 766.2755 Faoim~e: (41S) T8&7311 A FFIDA V [T I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and cotren: I. I have never bcen convicted or held liable for acts involving moral turpitude, including, but not limited to, any violation of federal, state or local law or regulations, and am not presendy under an indictment, investigation nr complaint charging such acts; 2. I have never had ajudgment in an action for fraud, deceit or misrepresentation entered against me by any :Dort of competen[ jurisdiction; and 3. I do not have any legal claim, lawsuit or administmo'yo proceeding arising out of, or involving a cable system. I 1 b~n~ DAT®: Match 20, 1992 AFFIDAVIT I hecehy declare under penalty of perjury !hat the following is true and correct: 1. I have never been convicted or held Gable far uts involving moral turpitude, including, but not limited to, any violation of federal, state tm local law a regulations, and am not presently under an indicunent, investigation or complaint chazging such acts; 2. I have never had a judgment in an action for fraud deceit or misreprescnradon entered against me by any court of compctentjurisdiction; and 3. I do not have any legal claim, lawsuit or administrative proceeding arising out of, or involving a cable system. DATED: March 20, 1992 ohn M. Duff, Jr. AFFIDAVIT a I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct: 1. I have never been convicted or held Gable for acts involving moral turpitude, including, but rw[ limited to, any violation of federal, state or local law or regulations, and am not prexntly wrier an indictmen[, invesdgarion or complaint charging such acts; 2. I have naver had a judgment in an action for feud. deceit or misrepresentation entered against me by any court of competent jurisdiction; and 3. I do not have any legal claim, lawsuit oc administrative proceeding arising out of, or involving a cable system. DATED: Match ?A, 1992 R. Thomas Goodrich AFFIDAVIT I hereby declare under penalty of pequry that the following is tme and correct: 1. I have never been convicted or held liable for acts involving moral turpitude. including, but not limited to, any violation of federal, state or local law or regulations, and am not presently under an indictment, investigation or complaint charging such acts; 2. I have never had a judgment N an action for fraud deceit ar misrepresentation entered against me by any cottn of competent jurisdiction; and 3. I do trot have a_vy legal claim, lawsuit or administrative proceeding arising out of, or involving a cable system. P DATED: March 20, 1992 Albert rash[ AFFIDAVIT y I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the tollowirg is ttve and correct: 1. I have never been convicted or held liable for acts involving morel ntrpimde, including, but not limited to, any violadon of fedetal, state or local law or regulations, and am not ptesendy under an indictment, investigadon or complaint chazging such acts; 2. I have never had a judgment in an action for fraud. deceit or misrepresentadon entered against me by any court of competent jurisdiction; and 3. I do not have any legal claim, lawsuit or administtan'Xe proceeding arising out of, or involving a cable system. / DATED: Match 2(1, 1992 'Ihe attachsd Affidavit sipped by me is intended to cover acts in the Stare of California as well as elsewhere, / nA~:3' 26 gti I ~~ William Marks ~+_~_. ~ v~K r March 19, 1992 BY PAK Mr. Jerry H. T111w00d Deputy city Managec CITY OT RANCHO CUCAMONCA P.O. Box 807 Aeneho Cueamonge, CA 91729 Ae: P[opoaed transfer of Cable Television Pranchiee to Afliliatad Company Dear Mr, Pd1w00d1 Ae you are aware, Dickinson California Arizona Auociatee, Ltd. ('DCAA•), doing 6u einees ae 'DCA Cablevielon•, has previously requu NO consent to tcanater its franchise to an eltiliated Company, DCA CABLBVISiDN, ae •et loath in it^ lane[ dated Fehruary 25, 1992. That letter contained certain infozmation conceznlnq the new company in which DCAA will be a general pacener and will hole over 90t of the equity. The following additional information fe submitted puzauant to section 7.02.100 of your ordinance: i. we undeeatend that none of the principalr of our new partner, Neet Coeet Cable Partners, L.P „ have ever been involved Sn any of the masters deecrioed in subsections 1(a) - 1(b) of that section, or has pending any matte-c deeceibed in subsection 1(el. further veztication of that point le being submitted to you directly by eueh principals. 1 2. Neither DCAA nor any o[ its pzincipale have ever been nvolvod in any of the matters deecrihed in subsections 1(al - 1(b1 of that eeetion, or has pending any matter described in eubeeeeior. 1(c), except foz pending matters involving your City of xhich you ere aware. Ae to such metseie, DCAA reitaratea Sts previously expressed beiiof that it Se in compliance with all caquirsmente of its franchise, and its offer to nettle certain disputed matters on the 6seie dsscribeQ in its letter of January 13, 1992. I~16O Eneo Circle s OulkllnpA Suue 1OO • Concortl COnlornlc pA52O • telephone (413)67a-O4n Mr, Jtrry 8. Pd1w00d March 19, 1992 Paq• Two 3. Pro forma balance sheets !or DCAA and tht tranelerae have been furnished to you which oonfirm the solvency of both DCA CABLEVxBxoN (tht proposes trensttrts) and of it^ ganerai partner, DCAA~ following complaL on o! the proposed transaction, DCAA'a only liebilitis• lol losing the transaction will be to altiliatad companies. It will have a0equete resources to mttt any known claims against it, Sncluding claims for attorneys' taae bairg asstrttd by :imea rlirroC Sn DGA'a pending lawsuit against that company (tvsn though DCAA does not concede such cleime, and dot• not expect them to result Sn any liability). We reepactlully repast oue request !or City approval of the proposed trsnsac tion~ pursuant to Section 7.01.100 (A) of your ordinsnca. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, ~Y ' Binot W. Tr p aenersl Counwl OCA CABLEVi510N PLJ Pclma Balance :heft Following Proposed Loan' AS6ET6 (1000) Currant Aaaetc: Cash ~ 340 ACCOUnCa Cr. CelVable 149 Preys id ezpenaa 74 Inva M OCy 135 Total current assets $ 698 Pined Assets Cable TV systems and Eranchiees X22,670 Total Aa9eta $23,368 LIA8ILSTI ES AHD PA P.T NERS' CAPITAL ($G00) Current Liab111tiEE: AUa MAI .$ 90 Toter Currant Liahilitiae ~ 90 Eonioc Loan $10,250 2lnancing Leaeee (over 1 yr.) 2E Pectneca' capital OCAA contributlone 512,000 WCCP eontributions _000 Toter R.quity X13,000 Total LiabilitiEa and Equity $23,368 " See attached notes. ... y~.~p, . ~0. W1J4Fv.R:~ .ET ~tiI J'=:aa -'_-. ~~,... ., cu-o.up .,~ - ._. ~~r i- Notes to Pco Forma Bale r.Ce Sheet • 1, ACA CABLLVI9ION ie a Cai!f ornia genacal oartnecship formed to continue and expand operatlone pcavloaely conducted by Dickinson Calitocnia Ari2one Aaeociatea, Lto, (•DCAA•). It will accept DCAA'a oable propartiaa at a stated value of $22.5 million and enter into a pending bank loan for $11 million (oE which 10.25 million will be drawn at closing). .Another genscnl partner, west Coast Cabla Pertnera, L.p., will contribute $1 million cash and aenume management oL th• partnerehlp. Proceeds of the bank loon will ba seed to sat!eify any liens or. the assets with the balance distributed CO DC AA, 2, The precadirg pro forma balance sheet of DCA assumes completion o! the pcopoeed transaction (including payment of $2;5,000 banK foes and $175,000 oC othec transaction costa including a 675,000 payment to Marks a Aesociaces, inc. against a $165,000 financing foe). A11 transaction Eees are eeeumed to be capitalLzad. The preceding balance sheet le based an the unaudited balance sheet of DCAA at O1/31/92r adjusted to reflect the foregoing aesumptlons, 1. Amounts shown on the preceding balance sheet are subject to adjustment to reflect 'closing adjustments' Sn connection with the proposed transaction. March 1B, 1992 ~uF o '90 -t S:Y L: M1II-.n'[.-~ P.~~ GI - -, i.. {. i.. ~ .....~ DICRIN60N CALIFORNIA - ARIZONA ASSOCIATED, LTD. Pco Forma Balance Sheet ~o iiowin9 Proposed Loan* ASSETb 00001 Current Aauta: Caeh General Parcnarahly ioook) DCA CAHLEVISiON Total Ae6eta LIABILTTIBB AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL (5000) Current LSahilitiea: Enee note Due ALL111ataa o£ GF', Parknere' Cpyl[al Ceyital contributed Cumulative earnings Total Lquity Total LSabi11t1ee and Equity 5 8,632 (2,396) 5 1,198 10,999 512,157 ....:aa 5 B 5,913 5 br236 512,157 ~...o.. ~: " 8a• attaohpd meas. Notes to Pro forme Bala r.ce Sheet 1. Aa dsecribed in its aud!!ed financial statements, Dlck ineon Calif ozni• - Acixona Aeaoclatee, Ltd. ('DCAA') !8 a Ca;lLornla limited per ererehlp formed Ln 1983 which bas constructed And is currently operating cable televSSlon aysteme in Cnlifornia. t has agreed to contYioute Sts cable propertiaa to a new partnership, DCA CABL~VISION, in which it will Cemein a general artner. Upon contribution, it will receive a distribution of 10.5 mililon from which It will repny existing debts and accounts payable (exeepe !oc certain amounts due to a£filiateel. 2. The preceding pzo forma balanco sheet o! DCAA assumes completion of the proposed transaction and application of amounts distributes to ez!scing Loans and nccounts payable. It ie baoed on the unaudited balance sheet of DCAA at 01/31/92, adjuotad to reflect the foregoing aseumption9. 3. Amounts shown on the preceding bnlance sheet are Subject to adjustment to reflect 'closing ad;ustmente' in connection with the proposed tcaneection. March 18, 1992 DICHTU50N CALZFORNIA-ARIZONA ASSOCIATES. LTD. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED MA CH 71. 1991 AND 1990 To the Partners Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. Concord, California REPORT OF :`!DEPENDENT AUDITOR We have audited the accompanyiny balance sheets of Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. (a California limited partnership) as of March J1, 1551 and 1990, and the related statements of operations, changes i.n partners capital and cash f:ows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the respcnsibility of management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion or. these Einanciai statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit ir.c Ludes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In cur opinion, the financial statements referred tc above present fairly, In all material respects, the financial position of Dickinson California-Arizona Associates, Ltd. at March 11, 1991 and 1390, an3 the results of its operations and its cash flows for the !ears then ended In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Blandinq, Eavdr' an May 24, 1?91 .. ~ '.. ~ ~ ~.~- u, D ICKL_:SON=dC'F04;:iA-A,4I 7.ONA ASSOCIATES. LTD. Sta [eaent of Oo e rations Far .y Ye E d d M r h JL 1991 d '990 ~ 1991 t990 R c:'E\U'c5 3 as is se r: is es $ 2,201.461 $1,270 ,228 Pav T V. 852,879 327 ,714 Ocher _ 103 818 7;1 .:9' ?o Cai Revenues 3.158. 1>8 2 339 129 E7iPEN8 E5 Opera[Lng expenses 547,179 391 , ~Oa Gnse of vav i '~. 431 680 L23 .7L= Total expenses 978.819 87.0 019 GROSS MARGIN 2,179,339 1,569 ,110 General and adm inis[rat ive expenses 943 345 _, 517 .610 Jpe rating margin 6efo re depreciation and amortization 1,235.994 1,011 ,46) Oeprec iation and amo reiza[ion 1 054 '+78 330 64.+~ PROFi? EROM CPEPATICN3 __181 516 20C d15 OI4ER INCGHE .ti+D i'CPENS ES Inceres r. income 2,509 40 ,150 interest expense (No Ce 3) (1,255,342) (995 ,44 ", Ocher 7 000 5 .702, Other income and expenses-net (1 245 83 )) (949.795; DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Nate L) Gain on sales of cable T,V systems - 2,54 1,155 Proft[ from operations from Ch iro cable T.v, syseem sold in May :989 - 7,975 Loss from ooe rations of Arizona cab ie T V. syseems sold in March 1989 _„__ ~1 4071 income from discontinued operations - _ 2 8`1-9 ~2_ ;ier too ome tLoss '~ ~ 064.3 V) $1.810. ?4.9 Cho a~.c nm pa nv utg notes are an in re eraL oa rc of ch is statement 2 ~ ~ c?nenr ~ Cha ne_s tr Pa: tna rs' ':.an _-_~ 'fears coded 'larch J1 L9oi a^.d '~'%: • Gener a: _: mite d To[a1 Tar ;ne :s Pa rtners On ginaL ~aplcaL $ 6 ,611,700 $2,550, ~`GD $ 3 ,981. 700 ~ , `a: cn.e:s is ce;esc in 1964 - ;727, i;0~ 325, 600 -Iap:cal ::. ..~; :b•r_ed in 1986 _ 2 .000 000 2 COG i)0 .e:at oor.;; ;bu :=_d capital 9 .671 X00 44 325 :0 4 .305 700 T a:c basis adlus cnent arising from 1?&: increase liml ced pa rt ee a ' in ce;ese 7 ,077,500 - 3 ,03', ;00 . iLxacior. of ;ax income (l.ossesi - calendar year _937 11 ,626.778) f:?, 0521 (1 ,607, 715) 13d~ ;J .07o,d94) 944. 221 (4, G2d. IL5) 1d ~i r2 725,472) 498, SG4 (1, 223. 9 i6) :385 jJ ,442,619) 69. 3LZ (3, 506, 431) 1997 (7, 557,251) !x00, 573) (3, 156, 618) i 9dd (4 ,265,485) (L,4dv. :0 L) (2. 716, 184) L9d9 6 ,171,577 7,891, 8;4 2, 279, 493 1990 f2. 655.09d) (1 703_529) (951 470) Sub totai (!5, 181,5401 1,789. 581 (16, 971, 227) :.d]us cmencs Eot di[fe rence 'oe c: een :ax and 'oa ok Losses ~A'~ 8. 203.[38 PdLC^R rs' Ca~iidi "!a rcn 71, i9'vi S 6.88B .402 '.~+'~ Coder the nartnersh ip agreement, individual ~api[ai accounts are maintained for determining liability for proj etc debe (Note 1) and distribution of assets upon liquida cion. r'or this purpose. each account is charged wiCh its share of ;axahle income oc loss for each caLe rdar year. The reconciliarion of book and taxable income is shocm above. The differences he cveen .osses Eor irc ome tax purpcses anA Losses for ho o'x arposes are subscanciall y ac[rth utab le co the. fn Liowt ng + The ose of the accelera r.ed dep reciacton methods Eur tax purposes versos the FASB 51 ..^„e Ch od (see Cah la T. L' Sys cem on page 5) and the scraigh,t- .:ne depreciation methods For book purposes ':ap ~. C.nli zation of conscrua ion interest for book purposes (Noce 2) and .;e duc;tor. of such in Cere.se for ir.c ome tax pu rp uses ` .., .. ~Icferred oaymenC of ~nCe ra s; on r.cces Eor nv nl: ourpnses and ~ ~ . .,, .e ductibtiteY ~~nrii patd ('in re :~~ ` ~r r^n'-;; tr;on of ,-he 'ia;~~e nF <ablr d~sr nbuC rcn ri 4hrs :nr book onrP~~z,..; 1~ .. ... allo'snb le for in ~~• w p~irpns es 'J~:I[:NSON :ti:fJ 441a Ml (.'A'A A iiC :.- :'] the Y. a: Cnd.C [1 )3 :991 anJ :i9J a9( 159o r . u.. ..a~a .: oie utlna utI. LCLu aa~ v x ua 5).I S. BOS 3 3 08 0 ] .-~-<rea. .: em [aa1 equ lva l<nta . 3 509 ,+ , 3 . x0,]30 h pa:: :c 1. inLlac. and e+q leY.ea ~1 919 6301 a Y:n ,,e . . ;1.353 JaE) (2. 63.a St1 (993, as 11 , - ] 000 3.)02 e, ca v~ uead fae opaeaaona ::0 656) i.00a l9E) Caan ..ova froo L..a otlra +cc tvtuu fNor< (I: u.da fram as eE c o a S V aYa c+ma a - S. J30 000 - ..a as ' ca b:e T V aYat ePa (1.203.150) . (l,OJ6, 03a) .w --coon of <aS:a 3 v a)acm vd !a f of a"a:::d .yu:im<fa 6 Rs 916) rt.0aa x211 vec caan is ev tiled pY (w<d fan .nvaa, :n9 actLV 2ttu (3. ]:9 SJaI 039 365 Caap (. cva Lrwn (tnancln[ +cu nclo (Nau )1 9cvvev (n[ wn banh 916,666 6,500 000 yo;ea f:an asf :: taro and am -.a.d lnvtoc t, a5 i. )ti , ] )19 50) Ve:ea paYa blc , , . °almenca en lo-.e'c. vn n -o paY+bl• f9.at5,133) p+ymanta of L . a.t pr;nc lGaL onP C+tm ..n .aa pq ap lr (BS. 031) fDS. JOZI +ah aEU m.e far tva+e :orl < a nanc tnt ac[ty lclu 3. 20 J. 95J 139).811 yer duo ve In cuh and aqu tval env (a 6.3 JJ) (a63, 9a 01 ~_uh and <yu Pn l<nra ac balm ln[ of Yuc lag OSJ 615.005 C+ah anL caan n9'+lva l+nca ac +~d of lur S 103. JBa $ L9.oll R<conc tl t+rton a( r t lnc m. (Iw al ,n nec cvh ua+d (or ap+a+c tcna: Nac tnc oou (1an1 S((, Oba. Jill 5 L. Bf 0,Ja8 D<p r.cl a[lon and aaa[tla a:lan I. OSa, a)9 810 6aa cam n at of raet. v, a , (L 6a 1. ISS1 0<r rc+,. (lno t.. a.) In r <ar,bt.a O. rs)s :e.92e ae (tne u+aal to prop+ld aapav ea SS.J9 (D,599) aaa In +eeowta pau6l• ? (16,316) (1 001,:96) 0 .<r (l6 6211 , _ $~t20 Nrt maM1 wad tot op.rat le na 5 !10.6561 $(1. OO a, 1921 tt.< ....,,.,wm(na no .a a:. ,n (n•q ra wtt of to (a ...c.marr V DICKI VSON CALI F02N:A-;LR IZONA dSSOCIATES LTG. NOTES TO FI N.A.V CIAL 8TA^&H EViS r ror the Years Ended Harch 7~~ 199! and 1990 NOTE 1 - OPERATIONS SICNI FLCANT ACCOL^;'IVG POLIO iES 49D CONCFNTRATTONS OF CR EDii R'SK' Ofcki nson California-Arizona Assoc is [es, Ltd. (DCAA) is a California limited par[r.e rship organized to design, cons truce and operate cable to Levis ton svs terns in Caiifo rnia and Arimna. IC has three general partners--Houncainaire Cable i.7., irc. (Mountainaire) and DM8 Cab Levis ion, Inc. (DMS), Arizona coxporac ions ;nd Dickinson Commur,ica[ions, Ltd, (DCL), a CaliEo rnia Baited paztne rship. The corporate general partners are m,-atoned by DOL. During May 1989, DCAA sold its Chino, San Bernardino County cable system for $i.' million: it refinanced its continuing syscexs (Note 3) wirh a long-term note payable to a bank; and paid cEf its remaining note payable to a life insurance company (Noce 3). In Hay 1989 DCA.4 purchased all the outstanding common stock of Trinity Cab ie . + frrm Hult icom, Incorporated, a cor.pnracien owned by William Dickirson and 9 root ;ripe for $2.1 miilion in subordinated debe, and paid off certain long-te ra d=_bts of rite corporation. The Partnership liquidated trinity in 1990. DCAA also purchased cer[ai r, OCL sys gems in Ho rnbroek and Bear Valley California for $i2>, OOC (Noce 1). As of June 30, 199i, the continuing operaeions of DCAA serve over 10, JOJ households in Rancho Cucamocga in Southern California and 4e ave r~iile, Hayfork, Hornbrook, Bear Valley and surrounding areas in Northern California. During September 1990, DCAA ourchas ed a r. a61e system rhat serves approx Lna Ce ly 640 subscr i.bers in ieh ama County, CaLifnrn za for $L 2 million 5 "---- ---' i `-----'--- --- 3asis of Ac_o :nu ng :: L:U ., .. "ae an': ::ai mecbn.: o: acccur;cto{ .. reports re ve nee t:: C^,e ':aa: ea r'ed and expense:. ir; tha .:ear recur t'ed C or ver tens and Corsccuct:on iuno aas - Converters and roost roc [ton supp l.es are recorded ac the Love: of ,.r5t-in, fi:s.-our (F?FO? cast or ma rcec CA Tb' Franchises and Licenses - Ac March 71, i991, franchises and Itcenses are recorded at a^. or!g_na1 sra red value of $1 miliion (Yo to i) plus tF,e c ests of add t-io nal franchises, syndication, permanent loan financ log, arganiaat is ns and Limitad par me [ship offerings. C ab lz Sa [ems - :"'.e Partnership capitalizes direct costs of cable to levis ton s:; rem ccrs t: ec t:on, preope rx ring costs and a por a on of prematurrty costs ?reooeracing costs ,. s'c;de costs incurred before the first subscriber revenue ar.d are comprised of all programming, technical, marka ring, adminis'.ra uve and iota rest expenses (exclusive of expenses cap itaL:zed zs roost: action r. ostsl ..~. ing the preoperacing phases of new cab la systems, aii costs inc;.ding rntaresc are deferred ar.d amp ccized over the life of :ne :espec ^':e .:zcshise.v- p rematuri t': cows are i. r~..rred from the rime o° the first subsc giber revenue until the Como ~:etion of cons teuceton. Loses capitalized tnc Lude all direct construction costs, a Dora on of certain fixed operating expenses based on cro gr ess coward the expected subscriber level at the end of this period and a portion of interest costs. She prematurity period generally ends ac the ear Lief of C.'n ;ears fr cm Che time of the first subscriber revenue or the completion of the const:ac [ion of Che distribution sysrem. As of Na cch ii. 1491, a [Deal of $9.2 million of cons trot [ion per wc'. interest and g=.neral and adm to istrative cos cs have been r.apicalized Ooeratinz and_aher Eauinmer.[ - Operating and other equipment ara rece rded at cost. Repairs and marnte nance are charged co opera Lions. Renewal and rep is cements are rap italized The cost and re la red ac c~unulated dep rec ia[ions sold or retired is removed from the ac cnuats, and any gain or loss is ref Le r.ced in income. Denrec iation a-d Amortization - The costs of franchises, licenses and eF,e CAN svs cems are amortized generally over fif Been Co o.+en Cy-five years us tog th_ straight-fine me shod Equipment is depreciated using the straight-Line methods over t'n tee to [en years. r_s comer deposits - Cus romer deposits for converters and oth_r remote control devices and ara classified as long-term ltab ilit its in cFe u comnanying balance sheets ing. plot Taxes - US?.A is a l;mitad partnership For E_deral and states inc oat ~.ax p~.:ryoses, each partner's share of the anm~al taxable profit or loa itto re ii „ reported cn the ind is ideal pa: cn_r's tax return. :..e pa gene rs'n ip rax returns are filed on a calendar year basis J _9_;~r}~nued ';pecaci.ons - Dtsc orn nn e~: operactons to Che acsompanv:°~ .inar~:.vi s~a~emnn rs ago shown ,-•para :elv aut rapresenc the npeor .~. n,l r ~; nt ~,,. 'lh ing, and Ar: zona ,..~ n. .;.ld ~n f:s~~t. t'ogq NOTE 3 - LONC-T EILN VOTES PAYABLE In June '-989, the pactne [ship borrowed $5.8 million and established a revolving credit Loan from ONG Banking Corporation [hat enabled the partnership eo borrow an addi cional $700,000 for construction before Narch 31, 1990, (Noce 7), and $900,000 co purchase another cable T.V. sys Cem (Note l). Payments ~f principal began i.n Oc [o bey L990 with the final installment payable in February 1999. Interest is computed at one percent over the prime rate, which decreases if certain financial ratios and relationships are attained. These ro tes are collateralized by the assets of, and the general partners' investment i,n, the partnership. A11 other partnership debts are subordinate to Che se notes, with [he exception of certain existing equipment leases. Inte re sc paid to the bank amounted co $774,400 Eo; fiscal 1991 and to $603,600 Co a bank and a Life insurance company for Fiscal 1990. This included $142,200 interest capitalized in 1991 and $287,900 in 1990 (Note 1). NOTE 4 - ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP PROFITS AND LOSSES (NOTE 11: Under the terms of the limited partnership agreement, the original limited partners (the 1987 limi red partners) receive and are charged vi th 50 percent of partnership income and loss for 1988 and future years (as dece [mined for income tax purposes, based on the 45 units subscribed). The 1983 limited partners have a "preferential right" [o receive twice their capital contributions to the paztne cship (o r, if greater, a 12 percent cumulative return on their investment), to the extent of partnership assets on Liquida Ciao. even if [his reduces other partners' shares. Under the terms of the Limned Pactne [ship Agreement, certain other limited partners ("the 1984 Limited partners") were edm icced as transferee limited partners after purchasing a portion of the general par cne rs' inceres CS in 1984. Under the terms of the agreement admitting them as limited partners, the 1984 limited partners rece the and are charged with 72.6 percent of annual revenue, operating expenses and interest expenses (as determined for fede ra! income [ax purposes, based on the sale of 4) units for $80,000 each). The 1984 Lim i.eed parrot rs viii also receive certain additional depreciation deductions under Section 747 of the In[e coal Revenue Code, resulting from r!~•~ purchase of [heir Tore rests For an amount higher Chan the genetaL partners' bond 7 NOTE 4 - 4LLOCATiON OF PA_giNERSNIP PRO FI"5 AND LOSS 5 fyOTE 11 (conc.): value. SubjecC co the "minimum preference" of the 1907 partners, [he L98/. l im iced partners have a "preferential right" to receive $91,000 per unit, co the y extent of partnership assets on liquidation, even if [his reduces the general parcne rs' shares, . Capital accounts are maintained for all partners reflecting their cumulative shares of partnership income and loss (as de [e rm fined Eor federal income tax purposes). Liabilities o£ the partnership are allocated to both [he 1987 and 1984 limited partners, to tha extent that their cumulative [arable Losses exceed the inieial balance of [heir capital accounts (adjusted co reflect the purchase price paid by the 1984 Limited partners). Each limited partner may be required co pay such liabilic ies or to make additional contributions Co the partnership _., in Germination of Che partnership or sale of its assets, partnership resources are insufficient co pay all parcne [ship debts. Assuming partnership assets are large enough to satisfy the "ninimum preference" of both Che 1987 and 1984 limited partners, the general partners will receive all additional proceeds until capital accounts ace balanced (in a ratio of 50 pe [cane for the 1987 limited partners and 32.6 percent for the 1984 limited parcne cs). The partnership has an option co redeem all of the limited partner units. On liquidation, any balance of partnership assets remaining after required payments co the limited partners will be divided between Che general parcne is as [hey may agree. In 1987 DCL transferred the Chino Hills systems in Southern Califo cn is to DCAq, on the express understanding chat (as between DCAA's partners) liquidating profits or Losses from chose systems would be allocated to DCL. 8 NEE 5 - LE$S~ Og4ICATIONS The par[ne rship leases equlpme n[, certain office and head end foci licies for y various toms through 1993. ITe minimum noncanceLlable lease obligations as of March 31, 1991 arx as Eo lLows: 1992 $77,500 4993 7,600 1994 3.800 88 900 Rentals under similar leases for the years ended March 71, 1991 and 1990, »ere $79,300 and $89,000, respectively, VOTE 6 - REIAT'D PARTY TRANSACTIONS' In May 1989 DCAA purchased 7einiey Cable T.V. and the systems in Ho rnb rook and Bear Vailey California (Note L). Unci1 July 1989, construction services were performed in California fot DGAA by Dickinson Communications, Led. (DCL). Cerc ain long ce rm financing has been received from Dickinson Communications, Ltd., gene rai partners (Nate 1), and N111iam Dickenson. Nora 7 - LAUSUir: DCA Cab levision filed suit in 1990 al Legiag that a new franchise agreeme nc pucporce dly issued by Che City of Rancho Cucamonga was unlawful. The trial of the ma tcer has been comp Le cad and DCAA is awaiting the <ourc's decision. There are no claims for affirmative relief against bCA Cablevision in the pending Lawsuit. The financial impact of a victory or a loss in a lawsuit Ls difficult to de carmine since is will be based upon future sales of cable services. Related Legal cos [s of approxtmacley $175,000 have been charged to CAN Franchises in the accompanytng March 71, 1991 balance shee c, Should the lawsuit be unfavorable such amount will be charged Co operations thereby reducLng partners' equity. 9 Clayton Graham 9955 Rob•rds Court Alfa Loma Californir.917C3 (714) 900-9421 Birthd•Nt July 15. 1946 Marital Status: Married, On• child, at•d 13, at home. Height: 5'1l": Weltht: 1001ba.: Heatthr Excellent Educatlpeal Backm round Mlaml Hlth School, ttsduate June. 1984 Ameoo Soltd-State CATV School, 1966 Vikoa CATV S•rvlc• Sdhool, 1970 Jer roltl CATV T•chnloml Tralnint Cour n. 1873 Frad Pryor Man•punt Seminar. 1979 P• n onn•I Mana lament Couraa. Yev•pai Coll•p, 1963 Aprli 3. 1988 to pru ant Reef noel Hanumr, DCA C•blevlaion: Reaponal bl• far ell DCA Gablavison cable TV aya!•ma wltAln San B•rner0lno County. Reaponrlble (or over- feelnt all p•H onn•1, twhnlcal and alert cal, and for the daily oP•retlon of tA• fYtteml. Lfalron with ally and county tovernm•nt bodler. Followint tn• sale of aatelllt• ayttsm, primary fooua hea been on tha rup•rvialon o! 110 ^ile plant fn hlth trowth area. System hu Brown from 5600 to 6200 auba durtnt thfa time. April 2, 3984 to Aprlf 9, 1980 fan•ral Mana••r, Scott Cable TVr Ru ponalble for all cable TV op•ratfona fn Ill m11• plant ayet•^ Ipeludint hlth trorth area. (Syr Nm trees from 3,000 to 7,700 rubacribera In four year period.) Raaponri bilitier Included tn• uptndlnt of the ryats^ from 10 channrl to SS channel capacity, Inatitutlnt an addrera•ble ayatmm and inoorporatlnt a n•Ithborlnt 200 subacrlb•r syatam Into •xlrtlnt aYatu. L (•2 Clayton Graham Fjalnvswnk Hi+[orv (cenk~dl March 23. 1982 to April t. 1981 ero Let Mana-er, pacific Ration, Marner Amax Gable Coawunlcatlona, Inc.: aaritn•d to Flat+taff, Arizona Rebuild Pro]•ot a. Re+pon+lble for L00 mllaa of aerial and !8 miles of undartround !00 MHZ rebuild. Dutlsa conat+t•d of or[anizint and over a clot inven- tory centroll onatint and in+tltutint quality con- trol over slectronle+, pa++lvee, coazlal cable, and wonltorint hlllin{ and proper inatailatlon of equip- ment 6y contractar+i tralnint and developwent of ew- ployeaa7 p•rlormint utilltY makareadY entineerint: trackint of pro]•ce budNt; and anurint that the ay+ U^ was technically mound upon coeq leklen. January 20, 1901 to March 22, 1982 Raelonal lj{naaar, Aclon CATVt R•q pon+ibly for all oehle TY oparatlon+ in the Cali- fornia +y+tema, daallnt vl[A ten fra ncnl+e • oaf vh lcn Included eltht oltla+ and two county area. Ovaro w int all phaf as of oparatioma to rebuild the +y +teu and azpand new plant to Cover +ome 100,000 home includint the RCA turnkey operation. The ea+!- •rn +yatea+ were usin{ and A.M.L. ayatN and I +uper- vl+ad the Inatallatlon et the A.M.L. +y+tem !or tAe v-stern ^reu. April 20, 1980 to January 19, 1981 Ca neral Han•eee. Slz Star Cable Overae•Int 300 mlle+ of overhead pant and 50 mllea of undartround plant inalallation+ of vhloh AO% vat activated and ^arketlnt proc•dura+ w re helot oon- duoted at khe ilea of sy departure from Pomona and t.aV•rne. Dutlea Inoluded owe n eelnt Inttallatlon of 35 cAannel Haad-End, aotivakkon of +ald plant, +et- tlnt up of the of floe and +tatf and Initlatint mar- katlnt PrOO•dur•+. May t, 1979 to April 20, 1950 Ma naa•r, 4arner C•D1a of Lake Arrovnaadt fn char{. of all phu e+ of 125 mlle+ of Plant, In- cludlnt the elifoe and technioal licit. OvetaN int the In+talletion of 22 wllaa of nav plant, 26 tulles of rebuild and In+tallation of an earth as tellite ra- oalvlnt Alan. ciaylon Grahan Eeelovu nt Ml atorv (con!'0) Septuber 1977 !o MaY 1879 t7anu a•r, Blahop Cabl• TV •nd $t. Georg Gabls TV: Yhil• supervlaleR the un+Nunt o! th• Biahe p. Cal- 1(ornl• ayatem, I waa aetively involved In abtalnlnR tA• St. Gaor{s, Utah f nneh(a• •nd pol• attachunt aR» emenla. Ono• obtalnad, I overti aw th• conatroc- tlon of J2 •(lea of ova rhead plant, 5 wtilea of untler- Rround plant, tA• inatallatloe of a ^icrowav• ayat»s, •nd a ken cater $oientlfic Atlanta reeeivlnR di.h. Dw ober 1999 to 1977 Maa Ater/Cite( Tenaeinian, Ma roer Gbl• of Blahop and Blahop Cabl• Tv, Ltd.: In oharR• of tA• ee~plet• op•raklona of fie mllea of p1anL inelvdln{ th• offlo• and leehalcal ataf f, pub- Ilc nlatlona and rat• Inureaaea. July 19RR !o Daeember 1998 It~yee•r/Ch/a( Teehnlelae, BIYth• Cabl• TV: Ru pon aJ 01• for •nkir• oparatlona o! of tle• antl teeh- nloai atalf, and •ntl n rebuild of open wir• and RG/11 cable aYa tam. July 199 !o July 1986 f,pa taller/Teobn(elae, GlobeJMl alai SYateala: Lu rnlnR •II pha ua of Inetallatlon and leohnloal pha ua of caDl• ayatem. Performed Instal La, IIn• saintanane• •nd aubadrl bar pia lnlenano• In this I10 •il• plank, Furnished opon squeal. _ ez Please accept thi• notice a• coot irmation that I, Clayton A. Graham, will be remaining rith Ch• new DCA Cablevision parenarahip im the capacity of General Ranaget. As part of my raeponaibil it lee, I viii oversee the cach rtical oper- ation of the Rancho Cucamonga System. DCA Cab lev ision is preee ntly meeting or exceeding •11 Ce clinic al and psrf ormanc• stand arch contained in the franchise agceemant. Aa ws move forward, we will upgrade and install the la bet ^tat• aE [ha art equ Spment to continua the technical integrity of the Reecho Cucamonga Cable System. A copy of my resume Ss sitached to eh ie statement. Clayton A. Craham Witneee~ _ 01 I, Clayton'A. Graham. Genacal rianager of DCA Cahlev Sa ion, do, under peneltie• of perjury, attest to the beat of my knoalsdge, cha subatantlQl compleclon of construct io¢ as outlined end defined in the Ci[y fea¢chiae for DCA Cable- vlsian. ~~~ Clagton A. Graham S Witness t7-~st EisiNr ~mro s A.,aw ukr Awiawe CamntirrircuromGmq 1a3Sl139r 3997 lt. Jerzy llill1i00d City d F~td1o 01r~1p~ I~tltfip NOBre00p9r Q 91!20 Daat IO:, flill"IOOdt x~il~la ~ ald caw of rl~rt emtc, z m ~alkteq m bBlrlt at ass taki7q Duerr tta ar,1leo1 a,n aulap~k ate! ~ a~t9],r~vLlan ~ Lst9d11N anNitl9 Ilttlda Ototmlpa 4a t1r att'salt tratl~tlaaa, Diddlaal C7~litacnl~-,llriaons 7199oa1a0u Ltd. l7rR Lss a~'rd LO Dea/SA9 Ou,ooo,a9o d aoim be9c l1:1a1odtq m ~t thla t:~raotlm, ~ aviEan~td by tha aoatltaalt Ltbs oL ~tta1 datl ha~wfith. MC. MaTlu !i a Vmy agiclaged asbL 1N op4apa vitri a lpg tsadc :wacd o! uooMSt01 tyta'atials in Yb 171flt9tly. 119 Sra a]ao a lat; ~1+q ad valutd alialG ad 1119 ha9c. eSrw 19i7r 7lrt bier pswldd aablra 1V liltatlaUq o~itatttts in aaoa~a ad X0,000,000 t>D hilt atl h1~ attiliata9, all aot 1f11d1 hM ban hattld 1n a v~cy ntldactay ttt¢rrr. Ili ara plaaaat 4o b abL tb wp{bt:t hilt a1d OG in IYltrlfo Q1ooGnya. alwa do not haaitatA m OOtltaot tr lWIA yyaq >'~r adrlitlaal 111Lasmatlm e~aM11q Flan a as ssiatiartstp wiC119:. t91t'!~. Nay truly yes, L9P,/!K NNf&nk Iff WafmaMhrBfnN, Prtw107nq, RIgOI/WMO7W.t89Cb' ~01.77ld7Af /Far I01•M1~177~ ~ MYA4, o1I411110.N4 f inyne W 0.pp Starpath is young and - growing private ~ Now has 12.000 passings, looking for additional gro By Leonartl C. Gregory S tarpa!n is one of those young growing companies with an am~ bilious plan for the future Dr recOng inat O~an Is a young private cable execuVVe horned Hank Thompson who got his Sian in me Industry m franchisetl cable '! had sr ctiy worn Ih¢ prancnisedl cable hai. Thompson said, unitl stoning the $laryath hrm Dack in 1988 AI that bme I was working br Planned Cable Systems, which is a francMSed operator m the ones of Carrollton and Addison Isuoums of ballast had ¢ight gledl years with Ihdt on gan¢aticn aver slating wan Planned Cable In Florda ns continued Mentor was Mads Thompson ~den]ihed ni4 mentor a5 BIII Marks_ Sr a 25year cable vet?ran now __ ivrng In Ine San Prancsco area I Wds ven'OMndle 10 nave do Oppor- Iumy Io be dSaOCldl¢d Wnh a man that has proven 'o be one o! cable s leading enireprenems Thompson said Bnl Marks has monvaled me to obtain goals whgn I uses 's mink were unreachable" Thompsc^ .vas vice president and general marage~ o! Planned Cable $ys~ loins WM1Qn ^p g12ClOllely dCC2ptEd an oner from Ma~~ 5'C help him slaty his awn business -- WorNmg wnh developer AI ',hai :a^'CUId' hmP, Wds WOrk:ng wim a dev? CCe~ n CarroL'IOn. m nne 01 our honer sea sy siem5. Thompson said He rag peer unhappy with the IOCdI hdncni5e o0eralOr 5 work m another cry and he asked me it we would IOnk al his propem, Ha had ^Or be¢n given a Ilmetable by ma lor.al +-a crhis?0 operator on Ine acnvahan D' l row 300~unn mmPlex n¢ had Jsl r'.~aP U~a Sd tie conllnued Unbl iht.l '~^'r' SA/,A Ty 4atl beo0 a cuss word hul ~ w.n pin no madv Io laccepl InFlI Chdrnpa Sla rpn•r. 'er'nn Hui wan Ina nne svsler+ r . ~^IV anerwa0 sever ai able firm wth muVlDle~una tlevstiptrs Came Io Ihem asking chat iney ,-Ohba service 10 then undo Numble lapinninga What started wrih very humble begm~ nmgs he cooed, Wrnetl oW naoelwiy l0 become a rose garden m a rery snnn penod of Ilme ' Tne hrm has 12,000 passings antler coniraa :n 40 properoes in Ine Danas area Not all are existing because sev oral propeNes are sell under construe hon ThompSOb 14 d0i d DIUe sNy person when he talNS aoom the ruture o! Star pdih M¢ tondo to couch h e answers carefully, admitting that n¢ does not expect fo get all the commas re tins Oulsidpdmy iodav, we have p moosas "I, nn about 48.000 passmys .n 'tis market h¢ sad Are we going In .end ..n W ilh all 40,000 Probably not WIII we end up wdh maybe Half of memo That s a possr bnlry Ii we entl up with hall, we re uD :o 30,000 plus unn5 And we are excned about some of Ine possibtlines Ine Industry is onermg. such as IB GHi he Anlmued There are olhe! pOSSDIIU¢5Ih31 may CUI dUW n yOUf long term rosts So d you ar¢ able to capdal¢e and 51111 penorm - which is th¢ Ney ward -~ we 11 be In the running for cOnSlderdllon on propenles Thal dre :n development " Expandirg grog eervexf the p¢nOrmdnCe 01 the company ~n ine Dallas area has given Ihem oplxn tunllles in other areas pl the Country should Ivey wish 10 expand ThOmpann Wds r¢WCianl In Idl4 aDOU ?xp.lnciPn ONbU¢ the Texas Brea We nave peen conlacled Cy .unl,~ ' Ih9 Idrpesl develnpnrs m Ine 'r , e I .I. +. . /prr4 Tn^r^P)^rr, pnalMm )rM CEO of $f)rpltD, !) n)nkM Dy nl) oMU man)a)r $MI(M Autry )rW confrollw $few FNCm)n. COMMIIl1ICATIOIYS. IIYC. \uC_ .7~J' ~ , 1725 B South lake Bhd. Suite 111 South lake, Texaz 76092 ' Metro (817) 491~JJ00 i / ~ANnJr~ Af~LC~ c ~ `_~i ~w~~ Carol Clark McCallum Meadows Apts. (214) 250-403E 7760 McCallum Boulevard Dallas, Texas 75252 David Frankfurt Frankfurt Properties (214) 250-3388 16500 Lauder Lane Suite 9200 Dallas, Texas 75248 Lawanda Parks Windtree Condominiums (214) 503-1974 8110 Skillman Dallas, Texas 75231 Donna Welsh City Secretary (817) 491-9693 City of Trophy Club 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 Ruth Dandalides Chimneyhill Homeowners Assn .(214) 690-8335 9223 Emberglow Dallas, Texas 75243 Cheryl Martelli Cypress Hills Apartments (214) 343-1894 9850 Whitehurst Dallas, Texas 75243 Tia Flanagan Stanford Court (214) 307-8921 18175 Midway Dallas, Texa575287 Jodi Rivera Marks of North Dallas (214) 248-3070 (Andrews, Devons, Williams) 4804 Haver••ood Lane Dallas, T "as 75252 Sheila Losby Covington Pointe (214) 934-8604 5330 Bent Tree Forest Dallas, Texas 75248 Nancy Bardwell Brightons Mark 4808 Haverwood Lane Dallas, Texas 75252 Melanie Berg McCallum Place Apartments 7650 McCallum Boulevard Dallas, Texas 75252 Meandering Trails 7220 McCallum Boulevard Dallas, Texas 75252 Jeri West Westchase 12921 Abrams Dallas, Texas 75243 Terry Turk Trammell Crow Residential 251 O'Connor Ridge Suite 100 Irving, Texas 75038 Tom Wilkes Staubach Company 6750 LBJ Freeway Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75240 Tim Rogers J.P.I. 5215 N. O'Connor Blvd. 16th Flog Zrving, Texas 75039 Tom Atchison First Property Management 12890 Hillcrest Suite 203 Dallas, Texas 75230 Mark Zale tale Properties 8144 Walnut Hill Lane suite 911 Dallas, Texas 75231 Bill Hammond Trammell Crow Residential 251 O'Connor Ridge Suite 100 Zrving, Texas 75038 Susan Caldwell Home Box O££ice 12750 Ile rit Drive Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 733-3011 y (214) 248-7650 (214) 644-2340 (214) 650-1999 (214) 385-0500 (214) 556-3767 (214) 661-1117 (214) 987-9001 (214) 650-1999 (214) 450-1016 s, ~3 ;J~"%, .\ a Florida Noose of Representatives 71;~,m;a„H. ',.Con, .Antntrnng Cu:un;lu.~r> nyn:v l;+.. .v :.1. ..:. p;n.n °n~;y Aa.an Eu; 4c: :: Gniu 4 'c . .., '~,. J SSr.J -u:.: Cale: 9ulu.n; ~'.}.~,~.. r".;..,..: ;"ici January 31, 1985 P''~ar.neC •' .e Systems Ccrpo ration C% '.a. 3~n'aard B'vd. Plactar on, Fi., 33317 To Whom :*_ Y~~av Concern: I hive known the South Florida Representatives of Planned Cable Systems Corporation for approximately two (2) years. Throughout this time, the staff of Flarmed Cable Systems has been very husy providing Cable Service to over forty-five (48) previously non-cabled areas within the City of Plantation, Florida. oaring the past two years, I have been in contact with various ca~.°~m~,unicy ''~eacers, developers, and residents from areas served by P"~, ar.r.ed Cable Systems Cerporation. I am very ;,leased to say that I feel our cemriunity receives the best possible CAiV and related services available. Ali zgree th zt Planned Cable Systems and it's staff truely pro- vide a seer ce for the betterment of the City of Plantation. Very truely yours,,Y~ ~~~ P~K'x Tom Armstrong J Represen*.ative, 96th District i \~_ PIAY~CO CNLC SYSTEHS CORP. ... ;f:'.om It ..^'iay Concern: i; is prooosal is being presented by Starpath Con:mu:ications in cxoe=alien with Cablevision Narag~~t, Inc, Cable Diar:a9g"=.t is the general paztner of Planned (a61e Systans. Planned Cable Systems ams and opezates several Cam;unity franchised operations in the Metreplex including the City of Carrollton, Addison, Southlake, Roanoke, Trophy Club, Westlake, and Baslet. hs. Thompson served as Vice-President and General Manager of Pla~v:ed Cable Systems for over 8 years. During this time, Mr. Tham~,son serv'_ed in our South Florida and 77xas Markets. S[arpath Communications was formed to provide cable television services cn a private or SMAi~! tasis. We feel the Metroplex is in need ., _` quality services by a professional organization dedicated to this carticular market. i a,T confident that Starpath Cortmurications can and wtiil meet your e:cpectations for cable television services. Sincerely, :a. J, Narks President y ?501 ti. MacArthur Boulevard, Smte 306. Inmg. Texas 75062 (213) 25b-CATV APARTMENTS 7?60 ,McCallum 81vd • Dallas. Texas 75252 • 214!250-4G36 '~+ay 15, 1991 Hank ^hompson Sta.-oath Cox„-unications, Inc. 1725 E Southlake Boulevard $Ult2 111 Southiake, Texas 'i6092 °e: Cable Television Service Gear 'ra r.k, I warted to thank 7ou and your company for the excellent ca61e television service Starpath has been providing to the McCallum Meadows. I have been the manager for this community since '.999 and wanted to let you know that I have never received any complaints about your. company from any of our 295 residents. I realize ±hat excellent customer service is oftan over- :ooked; however, your company's timeliness an3 professronalism s;^.ou1d be hichlighted, including your ability to always keep an open ear to our comments and suggestions. I lock forward to continuing our relationship on this and other properties in the Gallas area. Thanks again and keep up the Great Work. Best wishes for a bright future! Very truly yours, 1 / // /// \-. - Carol Clark Manager l:viNU'iiiE'C I-IC7~iL-O!l'^iERS ItiC. 9110 5!, iiimar. Dal!a s. Tc~~x 75231 213/ cc,_ ~,cer -, ~ _ _ .... ..- T.-.ar.cscn, ?. esl Cent i;m n. __,. _.._e.~e r_.,.. 5'ate :' ..c. ,_..,.`c ..G,.c.,....~_5 Aa PCC_a__.... ': c_csea -_ s the e:ceccred accsnd~~-: ~.,n,..,r e:,".~cres go~s c,...~a__ .,__. ~,t ___ .r:?d *cr z:: zdd:. t:c:a'_ _a'e ._.. e. .card c~ .. -_- ors Caere rare t:a~ P'_ezsed ro eater-d yc::r ccrtrac- tc ~~.= exceL'ent -anr:er ir. ~,uhich ~'te original instzllatien ~Nas rer- `crr.~ed, rot to cz^.^.icn toe co~stecus a.3 Professional ,rav;er e~.*_endsd ye~,:,^.sc--:: z;.d ~o¢r entire staff since ::over~r, 1990. __ - ...r Noce b continue z_cng relationship with Star?zth and t~,:< oo LL. cr ce __ na .,,tree ua ..__. the h.o .. _,. station-, T[a and }iSZ. .,.::cerlc :~ ~~ La:f£~d'.C.a -.525-..atiC'.Ortl, PCw'^, .._rg June 14, 1984 is r.ced ^. ah le SysCents F.ack :hoC.o50.^. " ;;i W. roo,ard aivd. Flantati -., _.. 33317 „_a_ Xr. .:~omoson: As you know, our community was supplied with cable television in early April, 19P4. I o~anted to take this opportun'_ty to let you know that your service ;;^:as exceeded our expectations £or cable television. ?;,e cons traction went very smooth, the installer was terrific, acd the c__ice staff was extremely courteous and knowledgeable, t is with great enthusiasm that 2 forward these compliments recording 2lanned Cable Systems. Been Co the Good pork! 'T ~~ Ivy latt :!arch 10, 1903 47i lliam J. Harks President F•1ar,n ed Cable Systems Corporation E720 N.[V. 15th hav Port Lauderdale, FL 33309 TO 4i IiCN IT HAY COYCE RN: I have known Bill Marks and Planned Cable Systems Cox-oration for approximately three years. During this time, we have been involved in the planning of cable systems foz two residential communities; one community is located in Dade Cowity, and the most recent community is Located in the City o£ Plantation, 9 tcward County, named Lakes of Newport. Lakes of Ne•.7port is a planned residential community cf aporoxi mately 1100 units. Bill's immediate goal was to negotiate and receive a franchise from the C.i ty of Plantation in order to serve this community. His approach to the City in the activities involving the ultimate successful securement of the franchise was done in a most efficient and effective manner. Planned cable Systems is held in the highest of este e,-, within the City of Pla ntaCion, and while it is a bit ?remature to make any comments concerning the ulti rate success of this Franchise, I am comfortable that this organization will serve our needs in a t ur:e Ly and professional manner. 'ie r~ tra j yours, Lanny M. Ralik PTe9ldent L.M (/b1w 2AIZENfBflCr~P,IMU~7ITIES,INC.I':~;~~~_,~~~,.~~ ,~~~>-,,E ::~,:,-:. bAyOU ~ARdENS RENTA! TOWNHOUSES & APARTMENTS ' Pla n::ed Cable Systems '. ~~7 ;•;est Hroward Blvd. .__.. _.. coon, .lcrida 33317 March 29,1985 .0 iIIiC}! I1 MAY CC[ICERN: This letter of recommendation is to advise you that we are extremely pleased with the services o_` Planned Cable Systems. They are always prompt, courteous and efficient and their representatives are a credit to their company. I would not hest. tate to extend every courtesy t0 t~'. e..,. lours Truly ~- ee acY. Resident Manager B/cn 4790 N.W. 9th Court ^ Pla nta ron, Florida 33317 i~Aa Wager's Office (305) 587-7955 ^ Rental 0lfi ce (305) 4724455 Fleet Nafional Bark - ~'a O;CO ?.ex;tlenr - y.oarea Cc mumcaticns Grp/p April 27, 1988 The honcrable Mayor Whft2 c/o Mr. 'd ;'lliam J. :Narks, Pre sider;t Planned Cable System Corp. 36C1 No r`.h MacArthur Boulevard Irving, T% 75062 Cear Mayor ~Jhite: Fleet National Bank has had the pleasure o' working with Mr. Marks and Mr. Tucker for the past two years. Ou ring this time frame we have committed to provide their companies with financing in excess o' $i2 millioc. All loans ,have been handled in accordance with their terms. i also understand that Messrs. Tucker and Marks, th reuch one of [heir companies, are applying for a CA?V franchise for the iown cf West.a'v.e. 1 am confident that the citizens of your town will be totally satisfied with the CATV system and will be impressed by the cc-::pony's service. The cost to build the system is also Weil within the company's capacity. Should you have any questions please feel free to call me at 401-278-5257, Sincerely, (~,~~~ J ,~~~r ~ ~~ c,;c: ~ ac F~a of IJalioral G'ank ! 11 V5'aslmmslei Streef, Provitlence, fihcce Island 02903 40 ] ~27e 6267 A M1lOm pfl O/f;l al Pr/I,nCIII G/O Lp 711 N PINE ISLAND ROAD • PLANTATION, FLORIDA 33324 •305-474-4855 I ~'~ Planted Ca blz Sy; ;ems il'~'i ~'A. Ef'nC. alJd, ?'antatior,, rl., 33317 'o ''n'hor: a '?ay Ccncern: Planned Cablz Systems, Corp. has been servicing our project fer ene year and we nave found their service to be 100; with a n.s~'~^~al of Service Problems. iie woad hiehiy recommend their service to anyone. Sincerely, ~~d1yl ~~`~7 E.P. 'Mack" hlcAtamney Project Manager V 1'r ophy Club Park Project 1107 Sunset Crive Rcar,o key Texas 75262 ,`b vember i9, 1987 .41r. Fiank 1'h ompson Planned Cable Systems 100 Indian Creek Dr. Rcanoke, Texas 76262 Dear Ha r.k, I would like to thank Plar,n etl Cable for the tlonatlon to the Trophy Club Park Protect. The ¢tldlCSona1 funds will enable us to complete the play eras. Piease thank all the employees who did a superb ,fob of creating a truly "haunted house," They must be ex tr¢melY dedicateU and creative employees. Aga1n, thank you for wanting to contribuce to making Trophy Club a better piece to 11ve. Sinyyc e--r ely, UG ~~ 6evnrly oley Chairpe: son poL~r~esfa~ ~araae~rls CONDOMINIUMS, INC. r I Januzry 2, 985 Plzr.^ed Cable Systems Corporation 7_Ji 'd. Broward Blvd, 'rla..._~: ".., X3317 Ate^.: Nan< ?honpson )ear Bark, As the new year is being brcuoht in; I r;a~ld like to take this cpco rtuai ty to extend tha appreciation of our cor:~:unity to Planned Cable Systems Corporation for providing a service which we both can be prod of. ? feel our residents have benefited from a personable, professional and efficient service which has been orovided in a timely mannner by Planned Cable Systems. I realize that often, it is the negative events that gain sig- cificance; however I feel th? overall oerfcrma nce of your company s'nc~ld be highlighted. Cur cor~~:unity will lock forward to a continued new year of eacell ent service. Sincerely, /\~ ~ ~~ titi,n ~~:~, 1 //~ )'L0..-cl., /J Aaron "Chick" Simon Board ;^.ember 400 N. W, 601h AVENUE O PLA NTATIC:^J, FIOii C)A 33317 ~ PHONE 305 - 791~C505 h r.e n'~r.errox P,orA r, Como ura~ra>r AssocuT•rn v. Ix c. Fnr,~~rroN C)rc r, 8901.690] Craa r.sa Rpnc Bps I]4 FUNTATIO N. FlO RIpA ~je317 Lcis Y. Car is-Ste /Trezs. 6901 Cypress Rd. A-14 Pl an tatior., FL, 3331? Flanned Cable R,V, ?1C7 '~,', Bro•ward Blvd. F'_antation, FL. 3331? ,. To 'dh c,r, It ,v,ay Concern, As 5^ar,a ger o£ Plantation Royal Cor,do, Section k1 I would like Vtc take this opportunity to cemmer.d N.ank Thompson and his staff r wo years pf flawless service. First, when the underground cable was laid they did a won- derful jcb of keeping the grounds clean. They replaced all the sod and were back daily to see if any sod needed to be replaced, this was done without ever having'to make a call. They kept checking until they were sure it would grow, In a very short time you could not tell where it had been laid. At a called Condo meeting Hank and his co-workers dis- played great patience and courtesy with the many questions sixty three fa.,.ilies can give them, They dealt with each ene with extreme courtesy. The office sta£S ehowe the came courtesy when service ca?ls are made, You never het "will you hold please". They are prompt, pleasant and close wittl "than:< you for calling°. Piars.ed Cable T.V, has been a pleasure both in service ar.d the picture we all receive. After two years with them them we have nct had to wait or,e or two days for service. They are prompt, 'rlith such a service I highly recommend Planned Cable T.V. ucder the leadership of Hank Thompson to be the very best, Moat sincerely, .~ /, Y 1 L oi3 ti. Caris, as tCgr ..eas. Cecemher 6, 1389 G'hinpne,~H1Il HOAIEOR'tiERS ASSOCIATION 9?'_3 [mctrciou Lanz Dally>, Te~aa 71713 I?I11 E90~R?3i Gtarpa th Communications, Inc. 190 W. NW Parkway, Suite C So uthlake, Texas 16092 Gentlemen: Cn behalf of the entire ChimneyHill community, may we extend our appreciation for ±he party you gave far u; last Sunday. The food, drinks, and gifts were delightful, and residents Seemed pleased to meet the technicians and other em plcyees with whom we shall be doing business in the coming years. Many received answers to the questions they have had concerning television reception. Again, thank you for yeur hospitality. We hope that our contract period with your company is a long and comfortable association. Cordially, THE CHiMNEYHILL HOMEO'dNERS ASSOCIATION ~l.l.~?l.l L'_ LL~s-,~cliA-Ci Cl-~-J Ruth C. Da ndalides As snciation Manager kCD/pm ,. ~.:. o ,~ ,,.. , f~" ~~ L ` 7a~ ro ' '~C' ~ . 6REG'J TIVE OFFICE CHARLES H, PEN N. JR. Our.-. Va ecn February 5, 1990 Mr. Hank Thompson Star Path Communications 190 N.W.W. Parkway, Sta. C Scuthlaka, TX X6092 Deer Mr. Thompson: Since Star Path found its way to my TV set I have onlp praise for your system. Also, map I add my thanks for courteous technicians who have xorked to improve our run-doxn and antiquated reception. Hopefully, as you might discontinue and add new channels to your line-up you will consider adding the "AMC" vintage movie channel. With best regards, harles H. Pann, ,J r. 12921 Abrams P.d „ J/307 Dallas, TX 7S2JA) R pjG RT LI V!NG - DOWNip WN ~~ PIEN TY OF FREE PA FKING 100°d AIR COYC' ..~.. ~~ B,~ fl(.flfl DUBROIU CER71fIE0 PUBLIC ACCOUNTAYT P:ar. r.ed CaD: =_ .'`. v5 ^. ep~5 v; ao .v':a :; ',a;,y. . "r iantatio^., F:or da 33309 .,~..;le^..... 7474 N w.: Yth S;ree: P1an:a [io n, Flo doa 33722 f305{.475~16?3 As z tar a,er uoard a;ember ar.d currently responsible For cable te. eV ision i.. ..,e Vi11 as of P1 ar,t at ion, it is my pleasare to in- .~-m y:,~ :;~.at Hank Thompson and your company have done a comr.^end- able job '°, selling, servicing, and installing the cable system with ir. cur complex. Through proper advanced planning and coordin- ation with me the installation for the remaining units in the complex is progressing smoothly. When small problems arose, sol- utions were quickly found. I anticipate the remainder of the in- stallation and transition from anerican Cable to progress as smoothly. Ili th this iecter I would also like to inform you that I will make myse]f available as a re£eren ce for ar~y individual or complex director looking for a trackround of your company's operations. 'fhls 5houid be construed as the highest wmpliment one can give a c^nnany and its pea onnel. deep up the good work! very 'iru ly 'fours, !'1 \. I ~~ ~-~ ~~ B. ,11an Cubrow P1RT1011AL ffIRITlfi6 Uf110f1 vFx~ewTV FU70 cw~ua~ri camawnriw ~ 0055 Ees'. H2rvald Avenue Denver, Colorado BOPS+ i3C3~i~].55p0 March 20. t932 TO: M-, w•. ~ "em '-larks MarKS a Ass.c-ates d2 Embarcage!'p Ctr. Suite e930 ~S". Frdr.'SCO, CA 941•.1 CNE cages T0. C'. ty' O` °3nCnp Cucanor9II c.0. Zcr 8JT 4anCn .. ~.~canonga, CA 91'3C r HOMtBI_L SHyCE F:AT:CNa'~. oARM'rRE UN:GN INSi:R AV^E RE: rans`e^ „a Pol'Cy DICKINSON CAL1FliP ~~; A-ARi20N.A Adgress Cnange [c.a~a9e Deaf Y~. Mar'x 5: r P'~ease ba advised that upon nottficattc^. of the Cate o4 olostn5 cf thY bank financing and the transfer or curchase of part pf p^cKi nson Cal :forma-An zgna also ;DCA CABLEI'I SICK i. ?^.0 current Cpl:ceb will prov :d0 She follOwtne coverages: PGLICY LI'd ITS . SR',:015293! PP,GPERTv COJERA3E S 9C 0. CCC.CC L:AB:~:7Y LIMITS £1,000,0OO.OC 2, iC30152932 UMBRELLA-'v ABI LI'v £S.000,COO.OC = w•1'. do a name pnan9e, address c~•~ange and .f ~te cessary tss~e new rertlf+pates upon rgquest. A copy of t'm a fax wall be nailed today to your cff ice and to DCA C4B1_EVISION. REOARO~. BILL SANDS CC: FI.E 81409 r;ATIONP.L ~ARMEFS UNION INBU4ANCe PAx f 303-G4G-E454 PHONE d 3C3-337-5554 Net'ional Farmers Umon Propady ano Ceeuelty Company NatwNl Farman Unwn SnndaM Ineurence Company