Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1992/04/15 - Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. April 15, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 xxx City Counailmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Comcilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember xrx Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office; 988 -1851 City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 1 re All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clark's Office receives all such items, A. CALL TO ORRER 1. Poll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout Williams _, and Wright jl. ANMOONCBMRlTB /PRE.SIDyTATIOM6 1. Presentation of Proclamation to galley Abbott, Danny Salazar, Nike Newcombe, Joe Underhill, Jerry Howder, and Ernie gopaaz for their efforts in apprehending a kidnapping suspect. 2. Presentation of Proclamation to Bertha Gomez for courage and heroism in saving and protecting her granddaughter from a vicious dog attack. 3. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing April 26 through May 2, 1992 as Volunteer Blue Ribbon Week. d. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing the Week of April 20, 1992 as Community Development Weak. C. 99N MICATION FROM =0 F-MIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City council. state law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and sat the matter for a subsequent meeting. Cossants are to be limited to five minutes per individual. O. CO SMMT CAI.la1DAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and nom- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item my be removed by a Councilmesber or member of the audience for discussion. City council Agenda PAGE w April 15, 1992 2 � 1. Approval of Minutes: March 18, 1992 (Wright absent) March 26, 1992 (Wright absent) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/1/92 and 4/8/92; 1 and Payroll ending 3/26/92 foe the total amount of $1,367,154.35. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 12 as of March 31, 1992. 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General 16 Sating Place Caterer's Permit for Backwatera, Backwaters, Inc., 10877 Foothill Boulevard. 5. Approval to Destroy Records and Documents which are no 18 longer required as provided under Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 92-097 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 6. Approval to amend Resolution No. 92 -077 regarding the 35 transfer of ownership and control of DCA Cablevision's Franchise Agra anwnt. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -077A 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO DCA CABLEVISIOH - DICKINSON CALIFORNIA- ARIZONA ASSOCIATES LTD. (DCAA) TO RESPECTIVELY DCA CAELEVISION, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND MARKS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 7. Approval of Funding for a Materials Recovery Facility 41 (MRF) study in an amount not to exceed $34,000.00 to be paid out of the San Bernardino County's Trust Fund, Sub Object No. 020, Fund 545. city council Agenda PAGE I[ April 15, 3992 3 _ 8. Approval of the Rnvircumental Initial Study, Parts I and 43 II, for the proposed Assessment District 84 -2 Storm Drain Replacement at Northern Terminus of Hermosa Avenue Project and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -098 44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2 STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT AT NORTHERN TERMINUS OF HERROSA AVENUE PROJECT 9. Approval to suamerily vacate a portion of 8817 Strang 57 Lane, located east of Carnelian Street north of Hillside Road and release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement requested by Gary and Janine Thompson. 69 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 8817 STRANG LANE E0 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM GARY AND JANINE THOMPSON 64 10. Approval of Nap and acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Parcel Map 13693, located on the north aide of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue, submitted by Steven R. Luna. 65 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -301 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 13693 City council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 1 4 r RESOLUTION NO. 92 -102 66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEVEN R. LUNA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 11. Approval to appropriate Account Number 26 -3900- 69 9109 /REVENUE and Account Number 26- 4532- 8768 /EXPENDITURE for the 1989/1990 Roberti- Z•Berg- Harris Grant to augment existing funds appropriated for Basketball Hardcourt construction. Approval to award and execute an agreement (CO 92 -022) to construct the Basketball Hardcourt Project, which includes construction of basketball courts at Church Street and Windrows Parka, with Terra -Cal Construction, of Baldwin Park, California. The contract amount for this project is $44,097.00, to be funded from Account Numbers 31 -4532- 8810, and 26- 4532 -8768. 12. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 92 -025) for swimming 72 Pool Operation at Alta Loma High School for Summer 1992 to allow City to operate lessons and recreational swim programs at high school for a weekly rental of $1,284.00. 13. Approval tO approve rent accord agreement (Co 92 -014) 76 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Pines Mobile Home Park. 14. Approval to execute Amendment to Contract (CO 91 -053) 77 with NBS /Lowry for tax and financial consulting for CFO 88 -2. Amendment is not to oxceed $6,000.00, and is to be paid from Account No, 75- 4130 -6028. 35. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Security 78 for a Traffic Signal for Parcel Map 12263, located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Kenyon way, submitted by Hughes /Lyon /Milliken Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -103 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR PARCEL MAP 12263 City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 5 _ 16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and 6i Improvement Security for Public Improvements in conjunction with the Rancho Cucamonga High School, located on the west aide of Rochester Avenue, south of Highland Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company, RESOLUTION NO. 92 -104 82 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL 17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 84 Tract 13440, located ont he northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -105 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13440 18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 88 Tract 13566 -1 and -3, located on the south side of Summit Avenue between Wardman Bullock Road and San Sevaine Road, submitted by The Caryn Company. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -106 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566 -1 AND -3 19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 91 Parcel Map 11030, located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Lewis Development Company. City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 6 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -107 93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11030 20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Honda and 94 Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 11410, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Highway. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $252,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 25,200.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -108 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11410 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORR 21. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 96 13275, located on the north side of Highland Avenue 1200 feet east of Haven Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 5,200.00 22. Approval to accept the Construction of Master Planned 97 Storm Drain Noe. 4N, 4P and 40 Improvement Project Assessment District 86 -2, Contract No. E7 -041, located at Haven Avenue and Nineteenth Street an complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion.- RESOLUTION NO. 92 -109 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN NOS. 4N, 4P, AND 40 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86- 2, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION MR THE WORE 0 City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 y 23. Approval to accept the Monte Vista Street Improvement 99 Project, Contract No. 91 -006, located east of Eastwood Avenue as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO. 92- 110 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MONTE VISTA STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLRTION FOR THE WORK E. CONBRff ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the ties of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one tiw without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any its can be revved for discussion. 1• CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MSESSMZNT AND SPECIFIC 101 - A request to recommend approval of the Stiwanda North Specific Plan, prozoning approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence to provide for 3,613 aingla- family dwelling units on 2,112 acres of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood ccroswrcial use, 4 schools, 5 parka, an equestrian center, and preservation of 4,442 acres of open space generally located north of Highland Avenue (State Route 30), south of the San Bernardino National Forest, west of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. 493 (second reading) 101 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 90 -01, THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN F, ADVERTIBED�IC�ID The following itees have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the westing to receive public testimony. PAGE 0 City Council Agenda April 15, 1992 B � 1. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 144 APPLICATION - FISCAL YEAR 1992 /93 AND RELATED AMENDMENTS TO THE CHAS - The adoption of the Preliminary Statement of Community Development objectives and the Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant Application for Fiscal Year 1992/93, based on a grant of $5$1,000.DO, and related Amendments to the Comprahensive Housing Strategy to allow the Funding of Public Service Activities. (Continued free April 1, 1992) 200 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROTECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -112 202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY (CHAS) TO REVISE THE ONE -YRAR ACTION PLAN AND TABLE 4/SA TO ALLOW VUNDING OF SUGGESTED PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES IN THE 1992 -93 FISCAL YEAR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE POLICIES COST RECOVERY - HERITAGE PARK EOUE57RIAN CENTER 204 215 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -1968 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91 -196 TO INCLUDE USER PENS FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES AND RENTALS 3. CONSIDERATION OP FNVIRQNM9NThL ASSESSMENT An GENERAL 217 PLAN AMENDMENT ,92 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amand the General Plan Land Use Nap as described below: City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 9 ti 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the South side of Foothill Boulevard weat of the Cucamonga Creek. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APR: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. B. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue. The Planning Comtissicn recomnando denial - APRt 208- 091 -36, 56, 57, and 72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APR, Portion of 208- 321 -24. D. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recomends denial - APM2 207 - 591 -21 through 35. E. For 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APR: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 through 23, 27, 28, 37, and 38. F. For 4.95 &cram of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue. The Planning Commission reco®ends denial - AM 207 - 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 30 s G. For 19.07 acres of land located on the west aide of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -01 and 31. H. For 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -06 and 36. I. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Co®ission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subarea: J. For 10.91 acres of land located on the north aide of Civic Center Drive an the east side of the Deer Creek Channel. The City Council will also consider including this property in the Haven Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APH, 208 - 331 -24 through 26. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIROMONT&L ASSESSMENT FWTHILL 218 6QU9VARD SPECIFIC P.AN MRNDHENT 92-01 - rITY OF RANCHO CCUCAMPkLQ - A proposal to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareast City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 11 A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the South side of Foothill Boulevard wet of the Cucamonga creek. The Planning Coaaiseion recommends denial - APN: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. B. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwest Corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue. The Planning Commission reconmende denial - APN: 208- 091 -36, 56, 57, and 72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the west Side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Ccamission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: Portion of 208- 321 -24. The Planning Convniasion reco®ends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTA_ AS BSSMBNT AND DBE 9PMRNT 219 DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CnCawnwna - A proposal to amend the Development Districts Map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avemie. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Cca mission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 591 -21 through 35. B. For 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Coam.isulon recommends denial - APN: 207- 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 through 23, 27, 28, 37, and 38. City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 12 � C. For 4.95 acres of land located on the .outhaa.t corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. D. For 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -01 and 31. E. For 12.14 acre. of land located on the west side of vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feat south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 211 -06 and 36. F. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. TFe City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units Per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for the following suDarea: G. For 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive on the east side of the Dear Creek Channel. The city council will ale, consider including this property in the Haven Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommend@ approval of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 208- 331 -24 through 26. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -113 267 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM PESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 2 19_ 13 LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 211 -18 THROUGH 21, 32, AND 34 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -114 270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULBVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN, 207 - 211 -18 THROUGH 21, 32, AND 34 273 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA B, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 1.84 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND CARNELIAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - "N. 208 - 091-36, 56, 57, AND 72 276 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA 0, TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESTDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRES FOR 1.84 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND CARNBLIAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 208 - 091 -36, 56, 57, AND 72 City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1992 J 14 ABSOLUTION NO. 92 -117 279 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA C, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 13.12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 208- 321 -24 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -118 282 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA C, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) MR 13.12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDS OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 208- 321 -24 285 ABSOLUTION NO. 92 -119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBARKA D, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 8.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 207- 591 -21 THROUGH 35 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -120 283 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER City Council PAGE April- 1992 1992 i l 15, , 15 y ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 8.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 591 -21 THROUGH 35 RESOLUTION NO. 92- 121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA E, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 THROUGH 23, 27, 28, 37, AND 38 RESOLUTION NO, 92 -122 294 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMB'HDMBNT 92 -01, SUBAREA 8, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 THROUGH 23, 27, 28, 37, AND 38 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -123 297 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA F, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 4.95 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AKRON ROUTE AND MADRONE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 262 -01 THROUGH O5, 38, AND 39 City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1492 1992 16 y RESOLUTION NO, 92 -124 300 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92-01, SUBAREA C, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP POOH MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 4.95 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MADRONE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 262 -01 THROUGH 05, 38, AND 39 303 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA G, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE HAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE; FOR 19.07 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CUCAMONGA CREEK, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - "Ni 207- 211 -01 AND 31 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -126 306 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA D, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) MR 19.07 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST_ SIDE OF CUCAMONGA CREEK,. NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -01 AND 31 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -127 309 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA 8, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER City Council Agenda PAGE April 15, 1092 17 + ACRE) FOR 12.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APE: 207- 211 -06 AND 36 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -128 312 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA E, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 12.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR! 207- 211 -06 AND 36 RESOLUTION N0. 92 -129 315 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA I, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27 ORDINANCE NO. 494 (first reading) 318 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA F, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 291-01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27 PAGE 0 City Council Agenda April 15, 1992 38 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -130 321 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA J, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM HEDI•JM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 10.91 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DEER CRESS CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 331 -24 THROUGH 26 ORDINANCE NO. 495 (first reading) 324 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA G, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 10.91 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 208- 331-24 THROUGH 26 O. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following its, have no legal publication or posting requirsents. The Chair will open the sating to receive public testiaonT. 1. CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR LARK DRIVE FROM ITS EXISTING EA§=RL,Y 327 TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE - Public hearing of protest, regarding eminent domain action to acquire public right - of -way for Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue at the property commonly known by Assessors Parcel Number 227 - 011 -13 (a vacant lot) for the construction of etrsst improvements across the south property line of said property. (Continued free April 1, 1992) PAGE City Council Acenda April 15, 1992 19 + ABSOLUTION NO. 92 -073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC "ED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF E_• CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following itus do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair any open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF FIELD LIGHT 328 AT RED HILL AND HERITAGE PARKS - Request by District 21 Little League to extend light usage on both baseball fields for the month of July. 2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE MASCOT FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO 334 CUCAMONGA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FROG - The Environmental Management Commission recommends the City Council consider adopting a mascot design to represent the City's Solid Wants Management Program. 3. CONSIDERATION TO EXECUTE A FINAL PAYMENT ACRE MENT ICO 336 92-0201 AND A DEPOSIT AGREEMENT lC0 92 -0211 AN2--Tp AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SONDS FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88 -2 (Continued from April 1, 1992) RESOLUTION NO. 92 -131 338 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF SONDS, DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THE FINAL PRICING OF THE BONDS, AND APPROVING THE FORM OF THE BONDS, BOND INDENTURE, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE SALE AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 PAGE 0 City Council Agenda April 15, 1992 20 I COUNCIL MINES The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Item Submitted. S. IDSHTIPICATION OP ITEMS FOR MIT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the nest meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the nest meeting. E. COIOBMICATIONS FROM TAN PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and not the utter for a subsequent nesting. Coements are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJO M99M MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE 8E88ION TO DISCUSS PROPRRTf ACQUISITION. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO JOINT MEETING MITE TEE r -EIMM0 BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ON APRIL 22, 1992, 7:00 IN THE RAINS CONFERENCE ROOM OF TEE CIVIC CENTER. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 10, 1992, seventy -two (72( hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 26, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adiourned Meeting An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, March 26, 1992, in the Council Chambere of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembere: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet I1, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; William Gurley, Deputy City Attorney, Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Pamela J. Wright • F • • R • B1. Approval of transfer of the cable television franchise, now held by Dickinson California - Arizona Associates, Ltd. (dba DCA Cablevision) to the Marko Group. (Continued from March 18, 1992) RESOLUTION NO. 92 -077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO DCA CABLEVISION- DICKINSON CALIFORNIA - ARIZONA ASSOCIATES, LTD. (DCAA) TO RESPECTIVELY DCA CABLEVISION, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND MARKS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -077. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). No communication was made from the public. City Council Minutes March 26, 1992 Page 2 r MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Suquet to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss property acquisition. Notion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). The meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 5:02 p.m., not to reconvene. Respectfully Submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: March 18, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 18, 1992, in the council Chambers of the Civic center, located at 10500 civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; William Curley, Deputy City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Attorney; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Tarry Smith, Park Planning /Development superintendent; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Scott Murphy, Associate Planner.; Joe O'Neil, city Engineer; Barrye Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer; Jo Lynne Ruaso- Peyrera, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Joe Schultz, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst 11; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst Is chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmembee: Pamela J. Wright. Bl. Presentation of Asset Forfeiture Funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. Captain Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, presented a check to the City in the amount of $49,605.53 foe asset forfeiture funds. B2. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is requested that items G1 and G2 be continued to the April 1, 1992 meeting, however, the minutes will remain in agenda order for discussion. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 2 C. CONM no CATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Mavor Stout asked that Item D7 be removed in order to take a separate vote on this mater. William Curley, Deputy City Attorney, stated the City Attorney's office Would like to have Item DID pulled and continued to allow for the resolution of issues remaining on this matter. D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 2/26/92, 3/4/92 and 3/11/927 and Payroll ending 2/27/92 for the total amount of $2,550,137.71. D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 1992. D3. Approval to destroy records and docuaments which a -e no longer required as provided under Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 D4. Approval of supplemental funding request by SCS Engineers -- Consultant for AB 939 for an amount not to exceed $8,240.00, to be paid out of the County of San Bernardino's Trust Fund Subject No. 020, Fund 545. D5. Approval to transfer funds from the 1989/1990 Roberti - Z-Berg'- Harris Grant in the amount of $34,470.00 to the Basketball Hardcourt Retrofit Project. D6. Approval of request by Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce to waive City fees in conjunction with the annual Business i Community Expo. D7. Approval of a Resolution of Approval for Environmental Aebeesment and Conditional Use Permit 91 -20 - Shell Oil - A request to establish a gas station, mini - market, and car wash on a 1.31 acre parcel in the medium residential designation (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Bass Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APNm 227 - 151 -17. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91 -20, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A GAS STATION, MINI- MARKET, AND CAR WASH ON A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 151 -17 De. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Jorge and Rosa Orozco and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk and wheelchair ramp improvements, located along the eastern and northeastern portion of the Orozco parcel for the Sierra Madre Avenue -Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street Alley Project. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JORGE AND ROSA OROZCO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME D9. Approval to execute a new Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Re- Dedication of Right -of -Way between Cary L. Youell and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street improvements located along the north portion of the Youell parcel for the Nineteenth Street Project from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A NEW AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND REDEDICATION FROM CARY L. YOUELL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME DID. Approval of transfer of the cable television franchise, now held by Dickinson California - Arizona Associates, Ltd. (dba DCA Cablevision) to the Marks Group. ITEM PULLET FOR DISCUSSION BY WILLIAM CURLST, DNPUTT CITY ATTORNEY. III. Approval to rescind agreement for Right -of -Way Acquisition between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and The William Lyon Company approved on March 4, 1992. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 92-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT -OP -WAY ACQUISITION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 4, 1992 D12. Approval to execute Contractual Agreement (CO 92 -015) between Oldtimers Foundation and the City to provide senior nutrition services. Agreement permits non - exclusive daily use of a portion of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center for senior citizen meal service and distribution. D13. Approval to execute contract (CO 91 -037) with the County of San Bernardino for Fiscal Year 1990/91 for Library Service Enhancements for the branch facility at 9191 Base Line Road, to be funded from Account No. 01- 4532- 6028 -4200, D14. Approval to execute contract (00 92 -016) with the County of San Bernardino for Fiscal Year 1991/92 and 1992/93 for Library Service Enhancements for the branch facility at 9191 Base Line Road, to be funded from Account No. 01 -4532- 6028 -4200. D15. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 2 (00 89 -001) for the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quald and Douglas, Incorporated for interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard Interchange Modification, Account No. 13 -50200 for design changes and additional design in the amount of $64,900.00. CIS. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12462 - Detention Basin located on the south side of Summit Avenue between East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by First Family Homes. RESOLUTION HO. 92 -064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12462 - DETENTION BASIN 017. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13351, located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vieta Parkway, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E %TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13351 018. Approval to ratify the Notice of Completion for the Heritage Park Ballfield Lighting Improvement Project, 00 91 -060, Marina Construction. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 5 D19. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 12873, located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $560,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) $ 56,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12873 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D20. Approval to accept improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13565 -2 Streets, located on the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $253,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 25,300.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMNTS FOR TRACT 13565 -2 STREETS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for CUP 89 -26, located on the northwest corner of Beryl Street and 19th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 5,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 89 -26 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D22. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 9350 - Ellena Park, located at the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Salvino Street. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 11,630.00 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of items D7 and D10. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 6 DISCUSSION OF ITEM D7. Approval of a Resolution of Approval for Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 91 -20 - Shell Oil - A request to establish a gas station, mini - market, and car rash on a 1.31 acre parcel in the medium residential designation (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227 - 151 -17. Councilmember Buquet stated that since the last meeting he has met with the Engineer to get his concern, resolved, and stated the noise concerns he had have now been met to his satisfaction. Be mentioned he is comfortable with the overnight restriction being removed as a condition. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91 -20, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A GAS STATION, MINI- MARKET, AND CAR WASH ON A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (8 -14 DWELLING OMITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 151 -17 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to allow for twenty -four hours of operation as proposed. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (Stout no, Wright absent). Mayor Stout stated he was voting no because he felt it was inappropriate for a twenty -four hour operation which includes a mini -mart and car wash to be eurroundcd by residential. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D10. Approval of transfer of the cable television franchise, now held by Dickinson California - Arizona Associates, Ltd. (dba DCA Cablevision) to the Marks Group. William Curley, Deputy City Attorney, stated there are certain elements of information that have not been provided in order for the City to make its determination on the consent to alts- the ownership and control of the current cable company. He stated on that basis, they would like the item continued in order to allow an opportunity to receive the information, analyze it, and let the Council make a decision at that time. Councilmember Buquet stated he was disappointed because he felt everything was all worked out. He etated he and Councilmember Alexander have not had an opportunity to discuee this yet. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 7 0 William Marko, owner and operator of cable television business for over 25 years, stated he has made arrangements to purchase DCA Cable W. He stated he is surprised to hear there were problems with this agreement. He stated he would like to know what the issues are because he has certain deadlines to meet with hie lenders in order to complete this deal. He asked the City Council what they needed to know from him. William Curley, Deputy City Attorney, stated the Code has certain requiremets that the Council should be aware of in order for the Council to make their decision. He stated a portion of the requirements have been fulfilled, but not completely fulfilled at this time. Mr. Marks stated he felt he had provided everything that he was asked to provide. Councilmember Alexander suggested that possibly a special meeting be set to approve thin in order to allow the Marks Group to provide all the information needed and still meet their deadline. Mr. Marks stated he would be willing to meet for a special meeting. Councilmember Buquet felt this should be continued to Thursday, March 26, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue the item to March 26, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). No items Submitted. • f • • • • F. ADVBRTI86D POLIC HURIM igs Fl. CONSIDERATION TO IMPLEK.NT CITY -WID CO R ID% RECYcLiNg pgoGpm - city Council will consider the Environmental Management commission's recommendation to implement City -Wide Curbside Recycling Program. Staff report and elide presentation made by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, and Jo Lynne Russo- Peyrera, Integrated Waste Coordinator. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Peter and Linda Bryant, 9466 Hillside, stated his family are avid recyclere. He felt the City Council should look at whether or not this would affect every citizen or every household. He felt it would be nice, in order to teach kids about recycling and have them appreciate it, if Something could be done within each family to get some kind of monetary return for being part of the program. City council. Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 8 Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II, stated the multi - family, commercial and industrial will be phased into the program. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Buquet asked about lids on the containers and felt for sanitary reasons this might be helpful. Jo Lynne Russo- Peyrera, Integrated Waste Coordinator, stated during the month of May there will be recycling workshops to educate the public to rinse out their containers, etc., which will also contribute to making things more sanitary. Councilmember Buquet asked when the multi - family will come on line. Jo Lynne Rueso- Peyrora, Integrated Waste Coordinator, stated by the end of this year. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to approve the Environmental Management Commission's recommendation to implement a City -wide curbside recycling program. Motion carried unanimcusly, 4-0 -1 (Wright absent). F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -0 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure III -7, Master Plan of Trails, regarding certain trail locations. Staff report by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Mayor stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN MASTER PLAN OF TRAILS (FIGURE III -7) REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92 -069. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0 -1 (Wright absent). CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 8SSMSSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL Aggh SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure II -7, and Figures IV -1 through IV -19, regarding certain trail locations. Debra J. Adame, city Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 688. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 9 ORDINANCE NO. 488 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, AMENDING FIGURE II -7, AND FIGURES IV -1 THROUGH /V -19, REGARDING CERATIN TRAIL ROUTES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 488 and set second reading for April 1, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT H SPECIFIC AMENDMENT 92-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure 5 -18 and Figures 5 -20 through 5 -40 regarding certain trail locations and to amend Article 5.33.200 regarding Comm unity Trails. Debra S. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 489. ORDINANCE NO. 489 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, AMENDING FIGURE 5 -18, AND FIGURES 5 -20 THROUGH 5 -40, REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES AND AMENDING ARTICLE 5.33.200 REGARDING COMMUNITY TRAILS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 489 and set second reading for April 1, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). F3. QQN p PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03 - U.S. HOMES CORPORATION - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision recommending denial of a request to amend certain development standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan as described below: 1) To allow single family detached residential development within the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) utilizing Basic Development Standards, and 2) To reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 8,900 square feet within the LOW Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) under Basic Development Standards, and 3) To reduce the minimum average lot size from 10,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet within the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) under Basic Development Standards. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 10 Staff report presented by Steve Hayes, ABeociate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Charles Schultz, Reid and Hellyer, representing U.S. Homes, stated they would like the City Council to take action on the Plan Amendment request and then if the Council feels appropriate, continue the Vesting Tentative Map for 30 days so that they can have the opportunity to work with department heads on the park Bite and other issues and come back with the ultimate Vesting Tentative Map proposal for determination by the Council. He continued by presenting background information regarding his working with staff on this project. He stated they would prefer to have the Specific Plan Amendment before the Council considered for hie project. He stated they are requesting the lot site be approved at 8,900 square feet instead of 10,000 square feet for their project. He stated he feels they are meeting the Btiwanda Specific Plan with their proposal, but realized there were problems with the Vesting Map as proposed, and is willing to work this out. He concluded by stating they would like to see the Council approve the Specific Plan Amendment and continue the Vesting Tentative Map for 30 days with instructions to sit down with staff to work things out. Phil Deatherage, 6564 Btiwanda, stated he is not anxious to change the density in Btiwanda. He wants to keep the larger lot sizes as is. Keith Agastino 6 Associates, stated they are asking for relief on the lot sizes. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Buquet asked for Brad Buller, City Planner, to give background information on this matter, which Mr. Buller related to the Council. Councilmember Williams stated she is uncomfortable with the smaller lot sizes. Mayor Stout stated the intention on the Btiwanda Specific Plan was to make it a distinctive area. He did not think the area should be manipulated to most economic times. He did not think the standards for the Btiwanda Specific Plan should be modified and did not think the developer should be given any special consideration. Councilmember Alexander stated the City Council had modified the area once before by going along with changing this area from multi- family to single - family development. He stated It was his understanding to try to work things out on the Vesting Tentative Map. He stated he was not in favor of punishing by not approving the Specific Plan Amendment and holding off on the Tentative Map. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt there could be an amendment to the Btiwanda Specific Plan for this particular development. He felt it would be appropriate to allow U.S. Homes the opportunity to meet the City's standards. He did not think it mandatory to stick with the 10,000 square feet lot sizes. city Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 11 r Councilmember Williams stated her concern is putting large houses on small lots. She added her concern was the statement of "an average of 8,900 square feet Lots. ^ She stated it is not her intent to give everyone the approval of an amendment that is being given to this developer, that this is a special situation. Brad Buller, City Planner, felt they would lose some unite in order to get the design that the Planning Commission was wanting if the decision was to come back with the amendment. Councilmember Suquet stated he hoped the applicant hears the City Council when they talk about a quality project. Discussion continued as to lot sizes. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like to continue the matter to look at other options which could come back to the Council. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they would bring back various Resolutions for the Council to consider at their April 1, 1992 meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03, A REQUEST TO AMEND CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE STIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to continue the matter to April 1, 1992 with options available for the Council to consider at that time. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (Stout no, Wright absent). CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF VHSTING TZHTATIVE TRACT 14211 - U.S. HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission•• decision denying a proposed tentative tract map and design review for the development of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the Stiwanda Specific Plan in the Medium and Low Medium Residential Districts (8 -14 and 4 -8 dwelling units per acre, reepectively), located on the east side of Stiwanda Avenue south of the Devore Freeway and wset of East Avenue - APNt 227 - 231 -01, 09, 12, 16, and 32, 227 -191- 15, 227- 1B1 -24, and 227 - 261 -11. Related file: Stiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89 -03. See above section for discussion. City Council Minutes March 28, 1992 Page 12 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14211, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE MEDIUM AND LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8 -14 AND 4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 231 -01, 09, 12, 16, AND 32; 227 - 191 -15; 227- 181 -24; AND 227 - 261 -11 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE DESIGN REVIEW OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14211, TINT DESIGN REVIEW OF A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE MEDIUM AND LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8 -14 AND 4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE., AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 231 -01, 09, 12, 16, AND 32; 227- 191 -15; 227- 181 -24; AND 227 - 261 -11 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to continue the matter to April 1, 1992 with options available for the Council to consider at that time. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (Stout no, Wright absent). G1. CQNSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTIQN TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR LARK DRIVE FMM ITS 014TING ROCHESTER AVENVE - Public hearing of protests regarding eminent domain action to acquire public right -of- way for Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue at the property commonly known by Assessors Parcel Number 227- 011 -13 (a vacant lot) for the construction of street improvements across the south property line of said property. (Continued from wrcb A. 1992) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 13 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to continue this item to April 1, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). • x x . • x G2. CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT 00 - LARK DRIVE FROM IT'S EXISTING EASTERLY TERMINUS * TO ROCRB TER AVENUE A = SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAM AVENUE - Public hearing of protests regarding eminent domain action to acquire public right -of -way for Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue and the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue at the property located at 11881 Highland Avenue (APE 227- 011 -09) for the construction of street improvemente across the south property line of said property. (Continued fr March 4, 1992) Mayor Stout opened the meting for public Fearing. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN R3AL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA AND MAEIMG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to continue this item to April 1, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). H1. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED AA42NDMURTS TO AGE PARLOR O IN ACE NUMBER 48 Staff report by Duane Baker. MOTION: Moved by Euquet, seconded by Williame for staff to proceed with the amndment to ordinance No. 485. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). . x ♦ x x x H2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS EZIMING TO g=UNLTY FACILITIBB DISTRICT 91 -1 Staff report presented by Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meting for public coamente. There being no response, public comments were closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of ordinance No. 490. City Council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 14 r RESOLUTION NO. 92 -075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A "HELLO -ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982" SPECIAL TAX, BOND AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMST ELECTION ORDINANCE NO. 490 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 92 -076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PRELIMINARY ISSUANCE OF BONDS OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution Noe. 92 -075 and 92 -076, and to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 490 and sat second reading for April 1, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). ♦ ♦ • f f R I1. DISCUSSION OF THE INLAND DIVISION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIESP BOUNDARIES Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II, with additional comments made by Jack Lam, City Manager, about the plan. Councilmember Buquet stated he could go either way on this matter because he felt there were prom and cone on the subject.. Councilmember Alexander stated he did not think it was desirable to break the group up even more. Mayor Stout suggested that a letter be sent stating that Rancho Cucamonga feels there are good arguments for both sides of this matter, and does not take a strong position either way, and that Rancho Cucamonga will go along with what the majority of cities decides. ACTION: The Council concurred with Mayor Stout's suggestion. J1. Councilmember Williams stated that April 6 - 10 is Library Week and would like the master plan for the library to be brought back at the next meeting for discussion. City council Minutes March 18, 1992 Page 15 It was announced that this item was to be removed from the agenda. K2. Phil Deatherage, 6564 Etiwanda, had various questions regarding previous matters discussed on the agenda. Councilmember Buquat suggested that he talk with staff regarding his concerns. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to March 26, 1992, 5:00 p.m. to consider the cable television franchise item. Motion carried unanimously, 0 -0 -1 JNright absent. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FUR PERIOD: 04 -01 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: Oa/91/92 .•..•..........•....... M..••....... ...•.•.....•••..•....••.......••.•...••....• • .............................. VENDOR % &ME ITEM DESCRIPTION PARR ND VARR. 4HT. .uvu........uu.uu.uv.. .............................a• u.................. o.......................... 244 G0.EAT WESTERN SAVINGS 300 SAM BERN CO RECORDER 3321 TRUOMG. MIM 3399 HUGHES MARKET 3364 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS 1 A G A EQUIFMENT RENTALS CO.. INC. 6654 A.B. DICK COPPANT 3070 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT. INC. 6645 ACTION INSULATION CO. 6657 42VANCED IMAGE SYSTEMS 6637 ALESA. CHRISTY -ROSE 6653 ALTA LOMA DENTAL GROUP 6638 ANDERSON. LYNN 6662 ANGELS ALSERTSONS CENTER 6658 APPRAISAL NETWORK ASSOC. 6652 ASHLAND CHEMICAL. INC. 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 402 AUTO RESTORATORS 6642 AVANTI INDUSTRIES INC. 6660 BARRY L ASSOCIATES 3227 BAYLESS STATIONERS 2067 BENDER L CO. INC.. MATTHEW 6639 BERRY, CHAD 6444 BOB'S TAR PREPARATION SERVICE 3330 BORAL RESOURCES, INC. 6640 BROKER, MASOCMA 937 CALCOMP INC. 1199 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE 6641 CAMP, KIT 6642 CAMAOY, BRITTANY 6154 CAMPO 6644 CAR AROMA SUPPLIES. INC. 3305 CARVE PACIFIC CORPORATION 441 CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 6663 CENTURY 21 OAHLER REALTY 6646 rMANOLER LUMBER COMPANY 6655 CHI COMPANY, THE 6563 CHI KAPPA RHO, GAMMA CHAPTER 74 CITY RENTALS 13D COMPUTER SERVICE CO 6651 CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN SYSTEMS 6630 CRUZ LANDSCAPE MAI NTEMANCE 2384 CNA CONSULTANTS 2532 D.A.R.E. AMERICA 6649 DANA'S HOUSEKEEPING PERSONNEL 307 DETCO 6643 DEWITT, JASON 6656 DOUBLE O. MECHANICAL 6659 E. AND S. GRAPE GROWERS L SHIPPERS .. CHECSA OVERLAP EMP. PO. DEFERRED COMP /PPE 3/22/92 65351. 6.651.00 RCDNG FEE /NOTICE Of 5PEC TAX LIEN 65352. 72.00 48 MRS AT 48.36 PER HOUR 65353• 401.ZB EMP. / COMMUTER OF THE MONTH 4/1/92 65354• 63.00 ((( 65355 - 65356 >>> FERTILIZER 65357 109.90 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 65358 161.39 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. F 2626 65359 35.00 PERNA /REPAIR BULK 6536D 302.09 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. a 20082 65361 7.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 9013 65362 61.64 REFUND CLASS 86130 ROT 091099 65363 25.00 OVERPAYMENT OF 805. LIC. 6 1468 65364 53.50 REFUND CLASS 86230 NOT 997876 69365 31.50 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 19431 65366 34.46 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 21164 65367 34.50 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 10463 65168 242.30 BASE LINE STREET IMPROV 2 ETIVRNDA 65369 115.28 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 65320 1.300.96 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 14619 65371 56.68 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 13710 65372 7.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 65373 883.23 AMERICANS NIOSSABILI7IES 65374 75.53 REFUND CLASS 86191 ROT 997884 65375 25.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 18468 65316 5.67 3/8 FINE AR4000 0 65377 56.25 REFUND CLASS 86070 ROT 691939 65378 48.00 MAINTENANCE FROM 411/92 - 4/30/92 65379 282.00 PREMIUM A04-DEPOSIT/FISCAL TR 90/91 65380 60.368.06 REFUND CLASS 66191 ROT 496402 65381 25.00 REFUND CLASS 46015 KIT 697108 65392 20.00 RENEW REGULAR MEMBERSHIP 3/1 -2/28 8 65383 90.D9 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. a 203D6 65384 21.21 SWEEPER PARTS 6 65385 153.18 APRIL PREMIUM GROUP 810631 65386 23.919.84 36 1 36 SUBJECT TO FLOODING 6 65397 290.82 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 239 65360 118.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 34805 65389 6.4T OVERFAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 6568 65390 14.16 GAMMA CHAPTER DUES /KATHY SORENSEN 65391 25.09 PROPANE 65392 49.18 FEBRUARY MAINTENANCE 6 65393 5.694.59 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 5291 65394 22.90 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 9 13914 65395 32.34 TRAINING PHASE /ARCNIVES PROGRAM 65396 11000.00 BALL POINT PENS 65397 T6.28 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 18769 65398 21.02 TREE REGISTRY TAGS 0 65399 16.16 REFUND CLASS 0 6191 - ACT • 97851 65400 25.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 9 19420 65401 42.40 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 1 4364 65402 11.20 P14 L: 1 ................... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONUA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -01 -92 (91192) RUN D.TEt 04/01192 1dtl: ...............• VENDOR . u........................ uuaeu......... vu• NAME ...............•....•............................. u ............................ov........ ........................................... ITEM DESCRIPTION PARR NO vv....... ........................v...... NARR. AMT. • r....... it CHECK' OVERLAP 6661 E.F. GRAPHICS OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 16213 65403 9.00 4762 EARL M. MARSHALL REALTORS OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 18413 65404 13.20 523 EASTMAN, INC LA8EL.TA5.3X15 /16.1 /ACRS.5M /9A 0 65405 105.76 4616 F16I5. JOE REFUND CLASS 4 5335 - RCT 6 97543 65406 20.Z5 123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 2838641562 - 56370336 65407 24.25 1090 FRA SERVICES. INC. GENERAL FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES 63408 495.00 4263 FUNCO OVERPAIMENT OF BUS. LIC. A 4583 65409 20.03 4760 GAGNON MASONRY OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 4 15460 65410 T4.00 4750 GALIE. DANIEL REFUND CLASS 4 5335 - RCT 1 96937 65411 20.25 1444 GARCIA. AMT SCOREKEEPER - PRE 3/22/92 65412 40.50 3398 GAVIRIA. LANGRU. A.S000ER OFFICIAL - PPE 3/2Z/52 65413 75.00 1245 GONSALVES I SON, JOE A. APRIL SERVICES 65414 2.100.00 650 GRAINGER. Y.Y. DRILL PUMP KIT 4 65415 41.25 2926 GREEN, JOE Y.B.8. OFFICIAL - PPE 3/9/92 65416 72.00 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 941 -8087 0 65431 3.841.76 4749 GUNTHER, MARY REFUND CLASS 1 5460 - RCT 0 92846 65416 35.DO 3125 HI STANDARD AUTCROTI4E $DO R BEACON - ARDE■ 65419 811.80 4753 MINCMEE. JOANNE REFUND CLASS 4 6070 - RCT 1 92134 65420 48.00 4766 HOLMES POOL SERVICE OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 0 7303 65421 92.44 1234 ROSEMAN VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 65422 16.85 4261 XTSTER COMPANY OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 4 2318 65423 24.00 IDEAS UNLIMITED SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL -KUMO 9IT21074I 65424 137.00 N4229 1121 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS PANASONIC 46-50OR VIDEO PLYR- MONITR 65425 81.15 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT RAPPS I RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9 65426 85.30 165 INGRAM PAPER PAPER SUPPLIES 65427 1.062.42 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ACCOUNT 6 1078012 65428 22.68 2315 INLAND W40LESALE NURSERY CRAPE MYRTLE 4 65429 57.10 4151 JARVIS. COURTNEY REFUND CLASS 0 6190 - RCT 4 96129 65430 25.00 4752 JARVIS. JUSTIN REFUND CLASS 0 6191 - RCT 6 96130 65431 25.00 4755 JOHNSON, KRISTINE REFUMO CLASS 1 6122 - RCT 6 96054 65432 25.00 4154 JUMPER, GARY REFUND CLASS 0 6231 - RCT 1 97825 A 65433 48.00 260T JWP INFORMATION SYSTEMS TELEPHONE MAINT. 4/1/92 - 4/30/92 65434 1.894.00 4769 K.J.I. PUMP OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 0 18746 65435 56.97 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 11X12 -60 LET OFF LEM 65436 14.82 3396 KELSEY. ROGER •.SOCCER OFFICIAL - PPE 3/22192 65437 25.00 602 KING &ERRING INC. CR METRIC SL 65438 6.73 203 KIPLLNGER WASHINGTON LETTER RENEWAL - 713/92 - 6/25192 65439 63.00 4748 KLECKER. JOHN REFUND CLASS A 5335 - RCT A 97894 65440 20.25 IIS KMART STORES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1 65441 285.05 1471 KNAPP SHOE COMPANY SAFETY SHOES - RICHARD ALCORN 65442 60.00 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 6 65443 1.321.55 518 KUHN. MARY 4 FRAMES/3 EMERG CAR KITS 11 GIFT IT 63444 93.90 3397 LAINEZ. JULIO SOCCER OFFICIAL - PRE 3/2Z/92 65445 50.00 4759 LANDSCAPE CENTER 1 15 GAL TUSIOANTHUS 65446 35.56 3262 LEE, MICHAEL A.S000EN OFFICIAL - PRE 3122191 65447 50.00 386 LYON CO.. WILLIAM REFUNDABLE MUNURENTATION -TR 14121 65448 4.750.00 1062 M C I TELECOMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER 4 IE128734 t 65449 617.39 477D M.D. INTERIOR DESIGN OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 7646 65450 23.00 2952 MAILSORT. INC. WEEK ENDING 3122192 65451 66.88 3367 M&MERI SIGN COMPANY, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 65452 1.058.69 1125 MC GAREC MACHINE OVERPATMENT OF BUS. LIC. 1 4467 65453 13.57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST Of WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -01 -92 (91/92) ...................................... ............................... VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION u.......uvuuu .........................au.u•......• • •• 4755 4757 .762 403 4530 4529 1171 AT48 IT36 4758 875 840 2640 2410 235 5597 1826 $599 5598 6013 2987 791 255 w3586 2850 5587 65 5558 3344 5600 1843 5601 345 2T6 5589 2084 132 5450 2143 5590 3278 MELDISCO RM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA.. MELNYK. JENNY MODERN AIR CONDITIONING MORTON COATINGS. INC. - BAUER MOSLEY. AMGIE MOSLEY, GREG MOTOROLA CDMMUN. 6 ELEC.. INC ROYER PRODUCTS INC_ MULLIGAN. JASON M.MURTRT. MONICA N 8 S /LOWRY NORTH AMERICAN TIMESMAXE /UNITEV ON -CALL COMMUNICATIONS ONTARIO. CITY OF OWEN ELECTRIC PACIFIC PROMOTIONS L INCENTIVES PACTEL CELLULAR PAIGES PLANT SERVICE PBS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC. PETERSON, BRIAN PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION STSTEX< PMI /DELTA CARE PDRA OISTR IBUTIMG CO PORTER. CANA PORTER. DENNIS PORTER, LAURA PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PURCELL, MINI R G CONSTRUCTION RANCHO ENGINEERING RANDOMEX. INC. RAWLINGS, LAN OFFICES OF WILLIAM RED WING SHOE STORE RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT AWODER. MARIA SAFECO LIFE INS. CO. GROUP ADMIN. SAM DIEGO ROTARY BROOK CO. INC SCHWEIGERT. MELISSA SIERRA SCREENPRINT GRAPHICS SLAGHT. GERI SO CALIF EDISON 1432 SO CALIF EDISON- -ATTNC SHEILA LUNA 397 SOUTHERN 0411 SYSTEMS 5603 STANDARD 09ANOS 646 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. 5596 STANLEY 0000 SYSTEMS 5602 STUART PHARMACEUTICAL 378 SULLIVAM. A 5605 SUMRIZE COFFEE SHOP 1561 SUPER SEER CORP. 7 NN CH OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. 4 3658 ACT 4 96390 -TRNSF TO CLASS 5312 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 20936 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND CLASS 0 5335 - RCT 0 97909 REFUND CLASS 8 5335 - RCT A 97910 MICROWAVE LINK - 411 -30/92 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 186D3 REFUND CLASS 4 6191 - ACT 4 96880 REFUND CLASS 0 6122 - RCT A 96897 CFD BB -2 COMPUTER MAIMT. -APRIL THOU JUNE 92 APRIL SERVICE CHARGE - 18011 -1 LITE AND SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 469105 KLEIN TESTER OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. 8 16283 A/C 81063311 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 15377 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 1815 ADULT SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER CITATIONS FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY •92 APRIL PREMIUM - GROUP 6 1236 CHEW DELO MULTI, CHEW HYDRAULIC OIL CLASS REFUND 86060. RCT896184 ART IN PARK SPECIAL EVENTS HELPER CLASS REFUND 6060. RCT 896183 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CLASS REFUND 66015, RCT 896429 PROD REPORT.SIERRA MADRE PRUJ 3/29 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. F 2656 COMPUTER DISK PAINT SVC OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 20919 WORK BOOTS -GARY GIBBONS REDI MEASURE 2 -0734 CLASS REFUND 85330, RCT896550 GOP 601 - 01014300 1APRIL -FIOE PERSMNL 3 SETS MODEL 700 GUTTER BROOMS CLASS REFUND 66130, RCT 896406 GOLD REFLECTIVE LETTERS CLASS REFUND 86095, RCT097559 65 30 134 0525 01 000 4 <C< 65495 71 30 147 3051 03 000 1 MONTHLY WANG SYSTEM SYC 5/1- 6/2/92 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 3719 APRIL PREMIUM POLICY0497390 -01 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 11848 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 18918 PLAN CHECK . 0058.0683. 1380.026T OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 16302 COMFORT LINENS FOR HELMETS RUN DATE: D4/01/92 PAGE: 1 ................ ............................... WARR NO MARR. ANT- ............................................. ECLR 4 8 6 OVERLAP 6545. 65455 65456 ASIST 65458 65459 65460 65461 65462 65463 65464 65465 65466 65467 65468 65469 65470 65471 65472 65473 65474 65475 65476 65477 65478 65479 65480 65481 65462 65483 65464 65485 65466 65487 65460 65485 65490 65491 65492 65493 65494 65495 >>> 65496 65497 65498 65499 65500 65501 655DZ 65503 65504 21.04 4.75 109.41 662.69 20.25 20.25 130.00 25.85 25.00 25.D0 :.127.50 1.440.00 45.00 7.391.25 21.46 1.50 345.01 29.29 43.48 81.00 410.80 919.73 509.07 25.00 13.75 45.00 168.69 20.00 55.872.90 32.04 280.00 10.00 124.07 211.19 20.25 97.54 200.42 45.00 1.202.50 40.00 1.153.16 2.413.53 575.00 14.66 742.52 20.00 28.35 300.00 61.42 92.76 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PENI00_ 04 -01 -92 (91/92) ............................... N.................................... VENDOR MANE ITEM DESCRI➢TION ........ ........................................................... 1 G 1 2689 5591 5595 1143 5592 5593 213 152I 756 477 267 2316 2227 5594 509 371 $504 SWANSON, BOBBIE TALATI. NAZNEEM TRIANGLE PACIFIC CORPORATION TURNER, ESTHER VALEI, DEBBIE WALKER, THOMAS MAKIE, KLEEM -LINE CORP WE TIP WELDING INDUSTRIAL L TOOL SUPPL WEST PUBLISHING CO WESTERN ROCK CO WILSON'S SONS. INC.. WILLIAM M. WOLF /LANGICNRISTOPHER ARCHETECT,IMC WYSOCKI. BRANDON XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZIP MANUFACTURING CO. :UN DATE: 04101/92 PAGE: 4 ............................................... WARR N0 NARR. ANT- ............................................... U CNECNM CONTRACT STAFF, ART IN THE PARK /ACT CLASS REFUND 6015, RCT 496380 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 12653 EGG HUNT CASH ADVANCE FOR PRIZES CLASS REFUND 06241[6240 1.50 OIFF CLASS REFUND 6130. RCT 097110 254 ECONOMY TURKISH RAGS AD YETIP CONFERENCE BMUCMURE CHIPPING HAMMER. TIP CLEAMER.SOISDS CA CO AM -GEN IND BV 14 TONS COM SAND SERVICE CONTRACT FOR FUEL PROFESSIONAL SVCS FEB 1 -FEB 29.1992 CUSS REFUND 06191. RCT496992 SERVICE CALL CHARGE MISC 1ST AID SUPPLIES 4 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 18951 00 TOTAL OVERLAP 65505 24.75 65506 2D.00 655DT 79.31 65508 300.00 65509 1.50 65510 25.00 65511 171.57 65512 IT5.00 65513 30.67 65514 64.T6 65515 331.07 65516 1.756.33 65517 21001.48 65510 25.00 65519 150.00 65520 525.11 65521 6.47 215.083 -92 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: Oa -08 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: u•.. 04/08/92 PAGE: 1 ..•• . VENDOR .............. u•..... . vo.• a... • . ............. MANE ............................e........ uuu•...................•.•.....•.... u•........:. ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO .......... oo................• ..... .............. •...•....................... NARR. AYT. ..................... ** CHECK$ OVERLAP SZ71 TA, THAN" CHUONG REFUND CLASS 1231 6D365* 67.50- «( 60366 - 64402 >>> 2610 SAN BERN CO SUPERIOR COURT DEVITO PARCEL 2ZT- 011 -09 LARK OR. 64403* 11,4.00D.00- 2610 SAM BERN CC SUPERIOR COURT B4UER PARCEL 227- 011 -13 -LARK OR. 64404• 1Z4.200.00- <<< 64405 - 65356 >>> 3364 0th AVENUE GRAPHICS VOID CK DATED 4/1/92 65351• 109.90- «( 65358 - 65411 >>> 1234 HOSEMAN VOID CK DATED 4/1/92 65422* A8.85- <<< 65423 - 65521 >>> 6702 AULT. LILY REFRESHMENTS GAN"ROO MEETING 4/1 65522* 36.14 <<< 65523 - 65523 >>> 5277 TA. THANK CHUONG CLASS REFUND $1231. RCT092815 -92617 65524* 67.50 «< 65525 - 65525 »> 667 VISA 4820 0'58 8095 9704 65526* 70.00 1820 FRANCESCO, VITO DEVITO COMP -RI -OF -NAY ACQUISITION /LARK OR. 65521* 124.433.56 <<< 65528 - 65528 >>> 3401 ALPERT. WILLIAM BAND - BROWN BAG CONCERTS 4/8/92 65529* 400.00 <<< 65530 - 65531 >>> 1 A L A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.. INC. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4 65532 140.24 6671 ASIJANA. ESTMER REFUND CLASS #5123 OCT $96048 65533 25.00 6697 ACE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT $5266 65534 250.00 2687 ACURA JR, OSCAR T. BASKETBALL OFFICIAL PRE 415 65535 60.00 6AT2 ADES. CAROL REFUND CLASS 65150 ACT 095990 65536 25.00 6669 AG ACCESS ARBORICULTURE INTEGRATED MANAGEMT 65537 72.89 669 ALCORN FENCE COMPANY FENCE L GUARD RAIL REPAIR 65538 001.14 1135 ALIGNMENT L BRAKE SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT #635 65539 314.18 6313 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS ANNUAL DUES FOR MEMBERSHIP 65540 120.00 22 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 65541 40.00 3394 ANGELO, GEORGE JR. VMS VIDEO TAPE 65542 53.50 6686 ANTILL. TANI REFUND CLASS 66240 ACT #97131 65543 15.00 6701 APWA 1992 MPWW POSTERS 65544 25.00 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS ARROW ATE BRIDGE Q CUCNGA CR CM 65545 1.422.50 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0 65546 1.136.79 1061 AWARDS BY CMAMFIDN ADULT TENNIS TROPHIES A 65541 425.51 6697 ALPEITIA. ELENA REFUND CLASS *6006 ACT 697099 65548 30.00 1686 BACA, CATHERINE PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR /AID PPE 4/5 65549 138.84 6673 BAKER, JEFFREY REFUND CLASS 85040 OCT #98460 65550 30.00 2516 BARKER. JEFF A. SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER /FIELD PREP 65551 43.50 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE SPRINKLER KEY /MP NOZZLES /MCSE AOAP 4 65552 197.22 3227 BAYLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 65553 7.26 6698 DEALER, RICHARD N. REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 05175 65554 250.00 3094 BEDROSIAN. ALEX ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL APE 415 65555 50.00 4'I BELL X HOWELL DUPLICATION /MICROFILM 65556 30.24 2226 BELL. ERIC T. BASKETBALL OFFICIAL PRE 4/5 65557 36.25 2517 BERRY. WAMCA PLAYSCHCOL AID 24 MRS. PRE 4/5 65558 125.52 6 1338 9I6 A AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 0521 0 65559 159.26 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO.. INC. SR. ST. PATRICK EVENT SUPPLIES 4 6556D 136.17 6608 BLATT. CHRISTINA PARTIAL REFUND CLASS 6006 TO 6OD2 65561 5.DD 6674 BLISS. ANALISA REFUND CLASS 45422 OCT 495937 65562 25.00 6675 $OGG$. JACKIE REFUND CLASS $6154 OCT 096220 65563 13.75 333D DORM. RESOURCES. IMC. 3/8 FINE A §4000 65564 68.27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L15T OF WARRANTS FPR PERI00: U4 -08 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 04/08192 YALE: 2 ................. •.... • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... •........ ............................... VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO VARR. AMT. ................. a •.......... •.................................. ................ .................................. u..... aN CHECKS OVERLAP 66T6 3OUROUE, DONALD REFUND CLASS 55461 RCT 598197 65565 35.00 6699 BRISTOW, SOPHIE REFUND CLASS 15135 RCT 096618 65566 16.50 6668 BROWN, BRENCON REFUND CLASS 56182 RCT 897525 65567 27.50 6699 BRYLA, THEODORE A. REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 05244 65568 300.00 6677 BURCHFIELD, JAMES REFUND CLASS 05303 ACT 096711 65569 15.00 6693 BURNS, CARMEN PLAYSCHOOL REFUND CLJ101 RCT10884 65570 18.00 1001 SURTRONICS REPAIR 3N 800 READER /PRINTER 65571 130.00 2559 C A L 8 0 MEMBERSHIP DUES 4/1/92- 3/31/93 A557Z 115.00 594 CALIFORNIA CASUALS YOUTH BASKETBALL SUPPLIES 0 65573 4.129.89 6670 CALIFORNIA PLANNING L DEVELOPMENT RENEW SUBSCRIPTION 65574 191.93 1223 CALSEMSE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4 65575 2.747.63 248E CAMCIND. KATHY PLATSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR /AID 52.5 MRS 65576 4ZO.00 6690 CANETE, JANICE REFUND CLASS 05Z60 RCT 09TZ59 65577 16.50 3305 CAROE PACIFIC CORPORATION SWEEPER PARTS 65578 6.719.68 6564 CARDENAS, MARIA REFUND CLASS 06175 ACT 095760 65579 27.50 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE STREET SIGNS 4 65580 4.943.66 1270 CHAFFEY COKMLNITY COLLEGE CUSTODIAL SVCS. CHAFFET GYM 2/15 65591 229.50 713 CRICK'S SPORTING GOODS INC ADULT SOFTBALL 0 65582 579.62 6694 CHD, FRANCES REFUND CLASS 16006 ACT 09TS02 65583 30.00 74 CITY RENTALS SNAKE. ELECT ORA IN b5SB4 30.00 6678 CLATTO M. LASSIE REFUND CLASS 05131 ACT 096512 65585 27.50 6691 COLLINS. MAIINE REFUND CLASS 46240 ACT 096424 65586 15.00 3026 CDROURA, ALDO A. BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER PPE 4/5 65581 20.13 930 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 25 TONS 44GEL SPECIAL MIX 0 65588 1.508.50 6692 CORRINGTON. JOHN REFUND CLASS 05260 RCT 49725& 65589 16.50 2872 COUM -T OF SAN BERNARDINO CD ADMIN FEE NOTICE OF DETERNINATONS 65590 875.00 6679 CD1.4DUF:, SARAH REFUND CLASS 06154 RCT 095804 65591 13.75 «< 65592 - 65593 >>> 85 CUCAFOMGA CO WATER GIST 4 CU FT 0 65594 4.442.51 462 CUTLER STEEL COMPANY GOTT PLASTIC WATER COOLER 65595 86.56 6695 CUTTING. BRUCE REFUND CLASS 05430 RCT 498222 65596 37.50 6696 CUTTING. CHRISTINA REFUND CLASS 15430 RCT 498223 6559T 37.50 239 0 L K CONCRETE CO ARCHIBALD L MONTE VISTA 0 65598 856.24 431 DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES INC.. J.F. ARROW ATE BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT 65599 3.530.71 6690 DECKER, MARILYN REFUND CLASS 06072 RCT 096271 65600 15.00 2650 DELGADO. JOSHUA A. BASKE76ALL SCOREKEEPER PPE 4/5 A 65601 03.88 60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF APRIL PREMIUM GROUP 04889 65602 17.064.90 1762 DENSON, JAMES MILEAGE REINS RESTRM LOCKUP 4/5192 65603 101.92 6700 DESERT SUN PASONARY REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 04966 65604 250.00 107 DETCO TREE REGISTRY NAMEPLATES 4 65605 80.81 6581 DEW, GAIL REFUND CLASS 05461 RCT 49797T 65606 35.00 679 DICKIES STANDARD INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM SERVICE 0 65607 453.70 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK RADIO UNIT 0624 65608 243.10 6665 DOME. ALYSSA REFUND CLASS 46182 RCT 095777 65609 27.50 6683 DUPRE, JOSHUA REFUND CLASS 56155 RCT 497927 65610 27.50 6682 OWINELL. KAREN REVUMO CLASS 06072 RCT 496300 65611 15.00 6684 OZIAK. ANDREW REFUND CLASS 06103 RCT 095772 65622 25.DO 6605 EASTMAN, DANA REFUND CLASS 06074 RCT 497113 65613 30.00 523 EASTMAN. INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 65614 7.36 6667 EDWARDS. COLLEEN REFUND CLASS 06090 RCT 096279 65615 12.00 459 EGGMEA0 SOFTWARE FASTBACK PLUS 65616 262.79 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR P£RI00: 04-08 -92 (91/92) .a u RUN DATE: 04108/92 PA,L: t v.................... VENDOR ................................................ ......... ............................................................... NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION vu......................... .............. ............................... WARR NO .................................0 . MARR. AMT. uu Ri CHECK$ OVERLAP 2034 ESPOSITO, CHRISTINA PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR PPE 513/92 656IT 241.95 6666 EVANS, BRITTANY REFUND CLASS 16280 ROT 096297 65618 22 -00 4771 FABER. CRISTY REFUND CLASS 0 6175 - RCF 9 95739 65619 27.50 3358 FAJARDO, MARCEL Y.B.B. SCOREKEEPER - PPE 4/5/92 65620 33.00 123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 7908782173 - 01476066 0 65621 91.50 3306 FELDER. JENNIFER Y.B.B. SCOREKEEPER - PPE 4/5/92 65622 44.00 I8t FIELDMAN, ROLAPP L ASSOCIATES MILLIKEN ASSESSMENT GIST. -PRJ 012230 65623 15.806.00 4788 FIERRO. KATHY REFUND CLASS 4 6260 - R 496484 65624 16.50 4116 FISMSEIN. NATHAN REFUND CLASS 9 6182 - RCT 0 96434 656Z5 27.50 3377 FITE. AATMERINE C. PLAYSCHOOL AIDE - PPE 4/5/92 65626 36.00 724 FLORIO, JOAN INSTRUCTOR PMT SPRING CLASS 8 6025 65627 53.08 1082 FRANKLIN INSTITUTE OFFICE SUPPLIES 65625 14.17 4780 FU, GINA REFUND CLASS 0 6051 - RCT 0 91110 65629 3D.00 2168 GALL'S INC. MITE TRACKER-10 /PK RED LIGHTSTICKS 65630 64.48 4789 G4915AY. JESSICA REFUND CLASS 0 5131 - RCT 19TZ56 65631 27.50 4114 GARMAN, JEANINE REFUND CLASS 6 6090 - RCT 0 96202 65632 12.00 4712 GARY, REBECCA REFUND CLASS A 5360 - RCT 0 95862 65633 15.00 1994 GILMET. VIRGINIA PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR AIOE -PPE 4/5 65634 79.52 4790 GOMEZ. PAULA PARTIAL CLASS REFUND -FROM 6160 -6295 65635 5.00 4791 GONZALEZ, MARISOI REFUND CLASS 9 5123 - RCT 9 97144 65636 25.00 _f 4775 GOPAL, PANKA REFUND CLASS A 6090 - RCT 1 96160 6563T 12.00 4192 GORDON. SANDY REFUND CLASS A 6061 - RCT 1 96352 65636 25.00 491 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 65639 52.50 1179 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORMS BREECHES, POLT /WOOL I 65640 305.47 4793 GROOM, JENNIFER REFUND CLASS A 5001 - RCT 0 96110 65 "1 25.00 4794 GROSSI. JOHN REFUND CLASS 9 5461 - NOT 4 98272 65642 35.00 4795 GROW, COURTNEY REFUND CLASS 4 5001 - RCT F 96551 65643 25.00 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 941 -0909 4 65644 626.45 4796 GUTIERREZ. RYAN REFUND CLASS 0 6155 - RCT 0 97613 65 "5 2T.50 4781 HAMMOND, CARCL REFUND CLASS 4 6051 - RCT 1 97606 65 646 30.00 3021 HARRISON. MICHAEL ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL-PPE 4/5/92 65647 200.00 3152 HARRISON, MICHAEL W- ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 415/92 65649 150.00 2855 HAVEN MIME L LIQUOR CO. CATER LUNCHES 1 65 6,49 51.87 820 HEARD P.H.O.. EDWARD INSTRUCTOR PMT SP91MG CLASS 06340 -3 65650 224.00 1833 HERCMENROEDER, LISA RCMC CCVERAGE - PPE 4/5/92 65651 112.75 4777 NESTER. SUE REFUND CLASS 1 5151 - RCT 4 96581 65652 27.SD 4797 MINCHEE. JOANNE REFUND CLASS 0 6072 - RCT 1 97135 65653 15.00 3405 HINSON, KEITH RING COVERAGE - PPE 4/5192 65654 107.25 4779 MJELN, LAUREN REFUND CLASS 0 6280 - RCT 1 98057 65655 22.00 3378 HOLMES, JEFF PLAYSCMDOL SUB -AIDE - PPE 415/92 65656 36.00 931 HOLMES, SHEILA PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR -PPE 4/5/92 65657 480.00 4785 HOLT. RYAN REFUND CLASS 1502D - RCT 4 97000 65658 33.00 1234 MOSEMAN VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 65659 18.85 161 HOYT LUMBER CO.. S.M. FORMULA 409 REFILL 64 OZ. 0 65660 147.88 4T98 HUNT, CAROLYN REFUND CLASS 4 5461 - RCT 4 97796 65661 35.00 4634 HYATT REGENCY J.LAM /4/22 -24/92 SPORTS C EVENTS 65662 333.00 495 HYDRO -SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 1 65663 363.18 897 I.C.B.O. ICED A PRUFILE - VIDEOTAPE 0 65664 1.216.44 2927 L C.B.O. SEMINApR WOOD STRUCTURES 0..[URiZE 65665 190.00 1787 IMPACT FUBLIC ATIOMS GREAT CONNECTIONS BY ANNE BARER 65665 11.95 16 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 8TH STREET - RANCHO CUCAMONGA • 65667 318.12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04-08 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 04/08/92 'A-;E: 4 u•....uo......ou............ VENDOR .... .................................•..........•................... ...................+v...................ovv...... NAME ........................... ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO u•...................... ........ vu..... NARR. AMT. .... .......................... ....• . 4A CHECK/ OVERLAP 1952 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD. NEVADA LANDING TURNAROUAD-6 MRS 65668 100.00 2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY GROUND COVER - ASSORTED 65669 36.31 4818 J. FRICKE CONST. DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 4 5197 63670 1,000.00 612 JAESCMRE INC., L.R. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 65671 426.18 3038 JA7KIA ENGINEERS, INC ARCHIBALD AVE STORK DRAIN 65612 4,365.00 4799 JOHNSON, BAILEE REFUND CUSS 8 6314 - RCT 8 97681 65673 13.75 4704 JDMNSON, JACLTNN REFUND CLASS 4 6182 - RCT A 96855 65674 ZT.30 3379 JOHNSON, KELLY ADULT SOCCER FIELD SUPER -PPE 4/5/92 65675 36.00 3022 JOHNSON, VIVIAN PLATSCMDOL INSTRUCTOR /AIDE -PPE 4/5 65676 324.13 1829 JNP TELECOM INC. LABOR TO SET UP MAILBOXES 65671 240.00 179 KAISER PERMAMENTE GROUP 8 1932-36 /COBRA - ROBERT DAVIS 8 65618 24.433.58 4231 KAUFMAN K BRGAD REFUND-MONUMENTATION DEP -TR 12937 65679 4,200.00 3407 KELSEY, ROGER ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL - PRE 4/5/92 65680 100.00 40DO KERNS, KRTSTAL REFUND CLASS 4 5131 - RCT 0 97959 65661 27.50 3172 KING. ANGELA PLAYSCHOOL AIDE - PPE 415/92 65682 108.00 149 KING, L.D. ARROW ROUTE I BRIDGE INSPECTION 65683 4,936.00 2399 KLUSAAN, CAROL PLAYSCMOOL AIDE - PPE 415192 65684 104.60 115 KMART STORES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4 65685 117.84 1218 KNOX INVOICE M 9202D0928 PO TWICE 4 65686 25.65- 1024 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY SS -1H EMUL 65681 352.90 339 LAN. JACK CASH ADVANCE /SPRIS L EVENTS 4/22 -24 65688 150.00 321 LANDSCAPE WEST DISTRICT 5 267H I MERMOSA MARCH 92 4 65689 801308.00 3091 LARKIN. DAVE INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL /CLASS 4 6300 65690 126.72 4816 LAUGMLIN CORP. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 9 5285 65691 21.12 4786 LAVERTU. JUDY REFUND CLASS 4 6221 - RCT F 98249 65692 31.50 4817 LAW SHOPPE, THE OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 4444 65693 49.50 849 LAWSON PROCUCTS, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4 65694 TA3.67 3262 LEE, MICNXEL ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 4/5/92 65695 100.00 4140 LERN CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 65696 89.00 979 LEWIS HOKE$ DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT A 5221 65697 11000.00 3281 LITTLE, JASON Y.B.M. :COREKEEPER- OFFICIAL /PFE 4/5 65698 22.50 4T73 LIU. JANICE REFUND CLASS 4 6280 - RCT 4 96164 65699 22.00 4802 LIVINGSTON, CAROLYN REFUND CLASS 4 6250 - RCT 4 96401 65700 33.00 4801 LOGERFO, CATHY REFUND CLASS A 5150 - RCT A 91443 65701 25.00 282 LOGUE, SALLY PLATSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR -PPE 415192 65,02 330.00 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 65703 30.08 4762 LUXES. SONORA REFUND CLASS 1 5151 - OCT 4 97191 65704 27.50 600 LYNCH, JANIE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 65705 27.72 4819 M.A.A. ENGINEERING, INC. DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT A 5173 65706 250.00 4049 M.M.A. S.C. C/0 JOHN OONLEVY MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 65107 40.00 4000 M.S.A. TREASURER INLAND EMPIRE P.BREWSTER,E.RUIZ- CNFNEO SPCE WR45P 65708 90.00 4813 MAC EWEN, CAROL REFUND CLASS 4 6240 - RCT 8 97130 65T09 15.DU 4012 MAC EWEN. CHRISTIE REFUND CLASS R 5430 - RCT .A 97210 65710 31.50 3169 MADOERN, DARLENE M. PLAVSCHOOL AIDE - PPE 4/5/92 65711 72.00 2951 AAILSORT, INC. WEEK ENDING 3/31/92 65712 110.11 3386 MAMMOTH HIGH COUNTRY INN DEPOSIT /LODGING TEEN CAMP TRIP(AU6) 65713 ` 654.00 4003 MARREL. SAKEERAM REFUND CUSS A 5131 - OCT 4 96809 65714 27.50 4814 MARRS, JERRY REIMBURSEMENT FOR WORK BOOTS 65715 41.18 4904 MARTIN. JANALEE REFUND CLASS 4 6154 - OCT A 96303 65716 13.75 2199 NC ARDLE, TRACI ADULT SOCCER FIELD SUPER -PPE 415192 65717 36.00 3013 AC CALL, SUSAN INSTRUCTOR PKT SPRING CLASS 0 60SS 65718 19.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERI00: 04 -08 -92 (91/92) RUN .... .... DATN 04/08/92 PAGE: .• • ........... ...........•..... ..•.uuo......ouvu.•... VENDOR ..................• ......... uu...uv.uuu. NAME v•..................ovo ...uauu.•.......uu....... ITEM OESCRiPTION ..............•............ vv........ WARR NO .............................•... WARR. AMT. v.......... V* CNECMF OVERLAP 3411 MC DOW, CAROLYN INSTRUCTOR PMT SPRING CLASS 85451 65719 26.80 4605 MC LELLAN. BEGAN REFUND CLASS 4 6155 - RCT 4 96355 65720 27.50 2707 MEADCYS, MARK 7.8.6. OFFICIAL - PPE 415/92 65721 42.00 2415 MEYER. CHARLIE ADULT SOCCER FIELD SUPER /PPE 4/3/92 65722 36.00 602 MEYER. PIT CASH AOV -TEEM SPRING CAMP - 4113 -16 4 65723 31560.00 ♦BDS MILLER. LACEY REFUND CLASS 4 5131 - RCT 8 96012 65724 27.50 4807 MILLER. TARYN REFUND CLASS 4 50D1 - RCT 8 97985 65725 25.00 4808 MILTON. AARON REFUND CLASS 8 6154 - RCT 4 96834 65726 13.15 842 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL EKG. REPAIR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 9 65127 717.31 1918 MEYER PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 65728 1.566.79 3406 AYERS, JEREMY Y.B.B. OFFICIAL - PPE 3/9/92 4 65729 88.DO 4810 N. L N. CONCRETE DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 4 5059 6ST30 250.00 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT 4 521 4 65731 TO.41 2240 HEALEY, RICHARD A. SOUND PONITDR - PRE 4/5/92 65732 13.50 4778 REEL, COURTNEY REFUND CLASS 4 6280 - RCT 4 98140 65731 22.00 4811 NEFF CONSTRUCTION. K.J. DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 1 4694 65734 1.000.00 2548 NIGRO. ANDREE' PLATSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR - PPE 4/3/92 65735 232.02 4809 NOVEL, JARED REFUND CLASS 4 6155 - RCT 4 97132 65736 27.50 3323 NOYES. KEVIN LIONS AEC ASST. - PPE 4/5192 65737 302.50 3279 OATIS. HOWARD Y.B.B. SCOREKEEPER - PRE 4/5192 65738 22 -00 4815 OCHOA, BENJAPIM REFUND CLASS a 5213 - RCT 4 98411 65739 15.00 -D 4783 OGREM. BRITTKEI REFUND CLASS 8 5120 - RCT 4 96826 65740 27.50 67 OM -CALL PAGING 18011 9 65741 2.790.38 1824 ORIENTAL TRADING EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 65742 372.15 235 OVEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4 65743 108.09 5320 P.A.P.A. PEST MANAGEMENT PESTICIDE APPLICATORS SEMINAR 65744 245.00 5086 PACE, JOYCE CLASS REFUND 45151. RCT497987 65745 27.50 2212 PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPPLY 3' SLIP REPAIR COUPLING 65746 25.86 1826 PACTEL CELLULAR A/C81340133 4 65741 347.75 2101 PARKER. TAURUS YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 65748 21.75 3404 PELTIER, KEVIN CFF -SITE CLASSES, REC ASST. 65749 74.25 2805 PENOERGRAPH, RONALD ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 65750 45.00 5612 PEREZ. GAIL REFUND CL43S 862501 ACT 896139 65751 33.OD 5633 PERKINS. CAROL REFUND ROOM RESERV, RCT48161(PARTL) 65732 112.50 6013 PETERSON, BRIAR ADULT SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 65753 60.75 2587 PETERSON, LILLI SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CRAFT 4 65754 118.77 5619 PITIMO, JOMARIE CLASS REFUND 85001, RCT49T211 65155 25.00 255 PUNA DISTRIBUTING CO GASOLINE, FLAMMABLE LIQUID 4 65156 13.714.51 5625 PRTGATMMO, JEFF CLASS REFUN046155. RCT19TI90 65157 17.50 426 PRIME COMPUTER. INC. MAINT.4150 CPU.OISK.TAPE L SOFTWARE 65758 3.008.02 2994 PRINT SOURCE, THE BUS CARDS ADMINISTRATION 4 65759 64.65 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY SHIRTS[PANTS-OTTEN. ADAME. YNIGUEI 65760 23.71 5626 QUINTANAR. HEATHER CLASS REFUND 46154, RCT 897550 65T61 13.75 5644 R.C.I. PLUMBING DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 85265 65762 11000.00 5634 RAMOS, DONNA REFUND - GOLDSTRIKE. RCT88414 65763 15.00 2842 RAMOS. NICOLE LIONS CENTER REC ASST. 65164 95.37 ` 70 RANCHO COCAPONGA CHAMBER APRIL PAYMENT 65765 1.000.00 3343 RANCHO MOBILE HOMES SERVICE COMPLETION BILLING- ELLSWORTH MALONE4 65766 6.163.OD 5624 RAY, SHANNON CLASS REFUND 45002, RCT09BO63 65T67 25.00 5610 REAVES. CATHY CLASS REFUND 16071, RCIP97274 65T68 46.00 545 RED WING SHOE STORE WORK BOOTS FOR i FAINT PEOPLE 65769 663.78 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -08 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 04/08/92 PAVE: 6 .....ea.•uv..........ev..... ............................................. .............. .................. a.. ....... VENDOR MIME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARR. AMT. ............................. ..........................•................ ................... ............................... 2023 RESPONSE ENVELOPE 2832 REYES, ANNE 5645 RMODINE COMPANY 5646 RICHARDS FABRICS 216 RIVERSIDE BLLEPRINT 5631 ROECKER. RYAN 5636 ROGERS, JESSICA 5529 ROSIN. JENNY 5620 ROSSEMI. DIANA 16 ROTARY CORPORATION 5635 ROUTXENI. JAMNILIAH 5606 ROAAS. NESTOR 5607 ROARS. MIRKA 985 SAFETY KLEEN CORP 2536 SALAQ. MARY ANN S61 SAN BERN CO AUDITOR /CONTROLLER 301 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS 13Z SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO. INC 3313 SARTOR'S MOBILE HOME SERVICE. PETE �5617 SAULS, LILA lam• 1105 SEAL FURNITURE L SYSTEMS INC. �.J 3039 SH ER TON NOTEL 1327 SMART L FINAL 3309 SMITH, MICHELIN 3278 SO CALIF EDISON 1432 SO CALIF EDISON- -ATTN: SHEILA LUN4 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. 5638 33BRASME, JOHN 5611 SPAULDING, CANIELLE 5632 SPAULDING, JACKIE 28DB SPORTINE 5630 STARK, HEATHER 2393 STATE HUMANE ASSOC. OF CA. 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 5615 STENHAMNER. SHARON 2180 STEPHENS. HOLSTON 5164 STODDARD. LIZ 3352 STUESER, ALEX 5663 SIDFA, KAREN 5627 STUARTICIVANT. TASMMAN 5647 SULLINS, MRS. LOROIN 5621 SUMMERS. MICHELLE 279 SUN. THE 5616 TALATI• ARNAVAZ 5623 TAYLOR, BRIDGETTE 5626 TAYLOR, SOPHIA 1151 TECHNIC 5614 THEISEN, BARBARA 3035 THOMAS, TERRY as CHECK# GVERLAI REG PRINTED 65TTO ADULT SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 65771 DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 04405 65772 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 0313 65773 SLACAL24E PRINTS. SETUP 0 65774 CLASS REFUND 06153, RCT097280 65775 CLASS REFUND 06006. RCT 096335 65T76 CLASS REFUND 05123. RCT492438 65177 CLASS REFUND 05421. RCT498304 65778 12Y SANTUNE SAN CHAIN SEA 65779 CLASS REFUND 05001. RCT097758 65760 CLASS REFUND 05162, RCT 095961. 4 65781 CLASS REFUND 05181, RCT 195959 0 65782 A /C17 172 01 6330 1 4 65}63 <<< 65784 - 65784 PETTY CASH 0 65785 CORR TAX BILL- A.D.86 -2 APN02D1 -771- 65786 APRIL PAYMENT 0 65781 MOBIL MAIN BROOM.ZSETS 70091 SET600 65TRI MAT L LABOR- BARBARA RICE 65T89 CLASS REFUND 05422, RLIN974TS 65790 SERVICE -PULL FROM RANCHO SEAL INV 0 65191 COMMUNITY SERY ICES CO NF 4/22-4/24 65792 TRAC SUPPLIES- BASYSITTING PROGRAM 65793 YOUTH BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER 1 65794 70 30 262 0009 01 000 9 65795 «< 65796 - 65799 71 30 228 7533 02 000 3 4 65800 04 3114 950 6303 1 65801 DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 45257 65402 CLASS REFUND 06280, RCT597129 65803 CL455 REFUND 05040. RCT4984T8 65804 DAY CAMP EQUIPMENT 6 SUPPLIES 65805 CLASS REFUND 16016. RCT137270 65806 CAL STATE HUMANE LAWS HANDBOOK 65807 UNEMPLOYMENT INS 10/1/91- 12/31/91 65808 CLASS REFUND 6250, RCT096249 65809 ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 65810 CLASS REFUND 06086. RCTS99055 65811 YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 65812 BUILDING L SAFETY WEEK'S MATERIALS 65813 CLASS REFUND 5001, RCT097519 65814 DAL CORD USE PERMIT VS MINOR OEV RE 65815 CLASS REFUND 15461. RCT 098280 65816 A/C NA 9OB2723 -JACK LAM 65812 CLASS REFUND 06221, RCT096379 -PAIL 65818 CLASS REFUND 45002. RCT 198062 65819 CLASS REFUND .5123. RCT /97725 65820 MAINT PRINTER 81000 65621 CLASS REFUND 86200, RCT 496226 65822 ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 65823 369.31 60.15 1.000.00 12.77 515.34 13.75 30.00 25.00 25.00 35.85 25.00 30.00 30.00 623.T4 476.06 25.00 525,840.14 390.06 4,490.00 25.00 357.04 238.00 46.12 81.00 279.81 9.336.98 286.52 250.00 22.00 30.00 570.83 20.00 62.26 2,682.00 33.00 45.00 10.00 50.75 75.58 25.00 139.00 35.00 50.43 3.00 25.00 25.00 245.00 33.00 25.00 CITT Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST Of WARRANTS FCR PERIOD: 04 -08 -92 (91/92) a. TOTAL 691.443.47 RUN DATE: 04/09/92 PAGE: T ...... . VENDOR ... a........... vu ...... .. .............................. NAME u • ... a v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. ...•....•........................... ITEM DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . •........................ WARR NO • a........ • ... .........•...................... WARR. AMT. •..... •... • . u •..................... 4• CHECK# OVERLAP S617 THRASHER, CATHI CLASS REFUND 05450, RCT 496612 65824 12.00 1919 TOMARK SPORTS INC. DUDLEY SBIZLND SOFTBALLS 65825 2.245.94 341 TRANS -NEST FCRO TRUCK SNITCH AST AND CAP ASST -4620 0 65826 64.53 3409 TRIMBLE, LATRIMA RCMC BUILDING COVERAGE 65021 180.13 3213 TUMCAT, PAUL ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 65828 75.00 5618 TURNER, LALREN CLASS REFUND 05111 - 5112 -15.00 RIFF 65829 5.00 2122 UNCLES, BILL FILM 4 65830 284.58 3283 UVA. STEVE ADULT SOCCER, FIELD SUPERVISION 65831 78.00 5639 VALL, MEG CLASS REFUND 06086, RCT 098053 65832 10.00 759 VALLEY PLANT GROWERS CRAPE MYRTLE •PINK• 4 65833 78.50 3556 VAN VALKEXBURGH. SUSAN PLAISCMUOL AID 4 65834 141.84 5613 VANZANT, JASON CLASS REFUND 06154. RCT 496205 65835 13.75 499 VISION SERVICE PLAN APRIL PREM GRP40101139A -R 65836 61181.00 1103 VISTA PAINT PAINT. 9-ROLLER FRAMES.SGL CONE CLRO 65837 629.58 478 WARREN C CO.. CARL FILE 112798, CLIFF FIELDS 4 65838 708.05 5640 WATKINS. THURMAN DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 45136 65839 500.00 213 WAXIE. KLEEH -LINE CORP SUPPLIE5-- A/C4331433700 4 65840 1.2T6.52 5622 NEST, ERIN CLASS REFUND 06100. RCT498201 65841 25.00 3410 WESTERN EQUIPMENT G SUPPLY CO. WA 2005653 V -BELT 65842 15.09 267 WESTERN ROCK CO 1 SCOOP BASE 65843 284.46 5641 WILKIE. ANGELA CLASS REFUND 06031, RCT 696867 65844 35.00 5642 WILKIE, SMELLY CLASS REFUND 06031. RCT 096868 65845 35.00 5608 WOOD. ERIN CLASS REFUND 06051. RCT496445 65846 3D.00 509 XEROX CORPCRATION MODEL 50 PR /COPIER A/C4975367897 4 65847 329.21 2098 ZAGORIN. KEITH YOUTH BASKETBALL,GYM SUPERVISOR 65848 91.00 3310 LAVACA. DAVE YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 65849 32.00 348 ZEE MANUFACTURING COMPANY VARIOUS AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES 65950 425.89 a. TOTAL 691.443.47 .9.1 NM I11 u's Wlk.o TI. Wla'Ell p911v ! - a.e :...............t :.9vl ;,I. H 25., ; 162 F91 M% Mil I-- ........... ll.y t 1.113 ....... ..... .. 'Aa . .................... I,In li.rm .. 4 " m pin, OX, ........... M.362.0 I.M "ol 1.]b a,31 3. 9: urllfewua ........... 1 2)5 :,,om o"', g. 3:: 9 ................ EIiX .......... .... . ....... .... —01 cis,.... . .............................1 116.M91 .............. I- t" '1-11 Irnala .1 l4 ....... w— nl --- - ------ --- --- A ryl:..: iry:' !Y 9f MXL NL! 'YVF �iR \i e•pRpL 10 Li i All .IIN!14M15 [II( F. WS1pP. :x15- Y Sl vl'0 Yi'9P1'I vAYS v0K0. ISUSP .P.- KtP'KKYF `ME VyYE WP41 Ytt^.1 %. '•h5 a 10 IPI IIAI;FIIIriS •:F %"': IpYI 'k115 HR •X AKRI'A 1{.13 v_ ;•]91,E1].kl 1,191.011 1,111.14SAI 3.I J1 1.1%• 3.111 Mr 11111 13 ]019: [pR'Y 111 IGEI BM ll•M'a: iW:gl,p0 ]dirl'k.•10 IW .i31.•N 1.1:9 1.111 I.I di OI:1:9I II 14M111 IKKx 31Y II'! v! ]p+r'10,W S'L1.011.W 1.111 1 1.16] )a Ir 9i 101%5 :1MLL 1.9 App 1.:9.13 fU,tlu 1.% HA.1W. 10 }W.1W.M I.IM I.IW I.EN M:15r 9} IR W195 F01Y IL•. !EE3 NK1 1fM.v3 yp •11u,p1 N1,py.tl1 yp i✓A`lY+ P.I. I.tb 1.1{8 •%l1h IN INC iWIXILL ICfP 84k 1:r;1'1] 1R],1W.A1 50.119.11 HO.)W.W 3.1b I. P10 1. p15 M E'? Ill 'X%3 FMIP!II POEA 91n Ji: H•il w"m'" }prOM.M 1W,b].W 11310 1.610 LAdp 01 /WI9E 10 Ml" .IE S[FM JI1;5 /9E ll0..0 }]p,1N.11 Htl.1W.R] I.tW I.Ttl I.3H II /11191 III y]W 14.1 E51[F\ 11 !]:v_ SM,O0.0 ,Spl,pyl W WI,GM.W I.:W I. M1 1.111 101 CIVS 30 Ai]0 iTiI 1%5''98 ]11;5:93 YA,•%J.00 ]tO,RM.W 1M.0W.W 1.'.R] I.TN A.3N 111.11%1 lfi W'" il`KA Y.I 111!^191 IW,AN.W UA.OM.W IN,[M.W I.:W I.IM A. )135 M /NIP3 53 S511C:%S W YKp45 101'01.w E'ri AIS,M "',%11,50 Lm IA!L LIS IRk •111[1 I.Il.. IM .IP ....' IMA: FW I:,1!A•M2.1d IE.I H.N:.15 I3,ISI,Hl.1f I.E. 5.111 S.N3 I M4 L6_k 4YK, PP151 fA0 1,!131000.0 I.III,gb.W ;,III.IM.W 5.943 Ems 5.153 I malk]+M M'EF[Pf5 I>,115,HLt613.]Ya.51i.]l I313b.H3." 5.103 Lul ]IX/µ Y'[C' IS4Fi -ItV4f .5h FE %Pk MIL MI MH 11110111 I,S10, MJ.W I, 001. M].W 1.1P1.yO. .W ].900 ). NI I. %013110193 311 Ip RkE YI110 Y'EEI11E5 0.tlr! W! R Mich 031:3111 :11,100.13 3]11311." 1111%1.10 1.w L31d LEE? 01101103 1,511 W$1l W [[ AIT I[A OvI lI rA] 131.1 l :.b 351, 591.Y 613.33LW A.StO P.81 \.1" 0101 110 1,111 OWIV N. YIRA Wall 0'111111 )If O.H 91113.31 BI.l10.SB v.m L]IS A.W O311L01 1.3]3 •0101 Hpk IM %I.. 0)10111 19.119.8 Il"..11 G61r]H.IB I.MO 1,631 8.91 y/IL01 3.]15 SSY'0rµ9 PI M(W1 I,lH 9t].q 1.10,111.11 I. PoI rtN.15 LEE, B. flO 1.1" .! 'Alm's OMIIIISIPPIIM eMd 31k1 b51K59 MI '!1 /15: P5 1,101 �d'..50 1.061,100.00 1,065.113.19 9.135 I.Ip 1.10 01/00111 I..% 11 HfLLii.0Y5 SFCIW[IIfS - ]15t.I 101" 3Ap R NIR I!o n3ll'll Al b1.191.Po ] 3Po,OW.M IO,A tLW B.Ib 1.315 P.AN 0115111 I,I l3 RIiS !Y "S hY1i aPP MiPR' 531, I6:,Si 9,81 A,OA.OIIAE2 2.190 461.11 1.06t 5.". T.9 1� 1 f 1 4 s IQ uU t:ll^V3 Clrr 9f 11aI10 [L<I: R9 - ,Y✓<.RY!PCflI %k10 YY!V 31, Ilt: IfYE5111fYt CI A'(t - rrplri ry.YS RRE> Ii51lFf .ry YAI L! iP[F rPtyF 4iY Ft 'NI J[ 11'f .e, r,O Lli 19 11' iVFCI:K 9 }L:dYS .. 3n a iaU er. Yn fnhras! a! v. ro Il,9itH 'lrLL iA91 1 6l,SIL91 AI% NS ...4 19vEIWo -s I]LSv9.lEt.13 L-M 16EC: IwF6;h11 E�[5 :!'Id.! tSM. Yf.R[i !IN$I tUAv ![901 LIXAL o6[RV Iwll ( }0 50 IMS mY 1.IK MttE MI'MI.I. XMA'S 111.1 M{ WlIl FENW AHiv !6M7 - WN pIWF Ef[fIt:FS IF61.1% MWE: ,M S AI 10I,0'A.M = 1R'nly� Rycriv 9Y IIIF S.Bd: ills v.oM 111.11, /.nz ill! 1;Il ::I:IM1 m,aM.M :,s1:,aM.M - I,9n,MO.M _ INRSS['IOY MIMES iA,F1.All:111S .M ,rq !R6 REn: I ,iNEO Ii'E ]AIE Pl tt'6511i 9p IIIXfJAWi 3ALAC! 'F:- 11.1E3 tt ]E'E �' pW I,eM,OW.M IES In4161A(WR: 1. M I.d15.50 30'1: 6118 .K S !il .e!0 OL 13'1; 1,191,61.'.30 90Xb w 01 Y.rrl '.1(9 HM,1$ I,P1,611.30 KIXIL, ICE] Nw 1.110 03'01 /1: !Yf:! I.NIL. 6W191AIi'. EC1E &I.E S,P:,bIS.:O $, P I, d15.5) d,1vt'll ]0 L-M 16EC: IwF6;h11 E�[5 :!'Id.! tSM. Yf.R[i !IN$I tUAv ![901 LIXAL o6[RV Iwll ( }0 50 IMS mY 1.IK MttE MI'MI.I. XMA'S 111.1 M{ WlIl FENW AHiv !6M7 - WN In y pIWF Ef[fIt:FS IF61.1% MWE: ,M S AI 10I,0'A.M 1.51 .W.M 111113 S.Bd: 9eon MM IIIM graoi v.oM 111.11, /.nz m,aM.M :,s1:,aM.M - I,9n,MO.M .XI. I u0 Etl3R W., KSMIN MW[E: .M :. b0 m,$51.6, M3.m.W 301,110.11 nl5fftr A1E0L5 SEL:ml31F6 - 01Y01P' HBl.l6 W.: I,eM,OW.M !M.s X61q IK ?%AR.T: 1 I, KS,II S.M i,]SI,M].31 I,M,M.0] In y pIWF Ef[fIt:FS 1 090'1 11 WLIf YFRm R.. 111113 9eon MM IIIM graoi v.oM 111.11, /.nz Mam fi3wulM M11MR e.m o;n6m .XI. I u0 Etl3R W., ,Op A41 MIG55 AG111519e14Y1 nl5fftr A1E0L5 SEL:ml31F6 - 01Y01P' !M.s X61q IK ?%AR.T: 1 I, KS,II S.M i,]SI,M].31 IF61g16 WM£: .00 $ x I, VS.II - I,b..11 IESIM'q W1CF' 1,101,511.50 I,IOI,L$.50 M61IbIK W WF: 50I,MI.y NI.WI.tp 1,116,0]0.91 I,ISO,IM.I3 Rt�l� peR p I COPY._ - PA. AIIF%XlkSEON EM AICOFR K ALYY,RW IICOyIsI 1. TYPHSI OE IICENSE(51 FIIE NO C Tc: Mgrlment of Akobolk 1w,wv9. Control pECur N 001 &T-d, vlv.r.la. CH SA Ev3N,,A1 sai=l$ I---- GEOGIIAIIiKAL Y.. n µl o� GTL'G O:.ACE )M1e vr'JO>:YrrM Fu.bl uroEw<b 1& Leenle N.mbe.01 ^A:YnEP'S pCPN:T Co. 161T �IbH r blud finnw[dnrrrbdmlolb.c APplied w $e[. 2" .� ] NAMEI51 Of APRIGNTIS; — f<mp. Nwmir 4A:T_Ps. ;pC. Ef1M DPAP, t.ay.. ^.ce Ell Lc-sn! s. sls: P :ABC 12 1ttF(5) Of iMNSAC11OTy51 Tounry EE lK. Mara. NcGr . 5a0 Do Vol Wolf Moo, This Lim. For Mf rfmenl I Ae (hdy Ana,hed "yRnwdrd Bona, m (ollw frdvaun popen. n ......... ._ .. .... .. . ._COFlf5 F1ABE0 .L39 {91 _ .. ._, tinsel. Fee M_ ... Pad m . ... ... . ............. CFET —_._.. .___ArcxP No ..... 5 E.• I .) m1nefmlr __ __L ISb a Nom. a er,rwe Bac; „aters a CRY OF RAN0CH,O- UCA QN F - --j- s tocabon of Mrun.Il- Ifvmbm ooh SA. P.^ 11 �" P,14 - - -I 10617 Yootnl:: B2'fa. MN H Z O&Z City PTA Lp (PTA CounlY r 9E A24 E� f -,,WNQ CUCANCNG 91)]lr an Ber—ni TOTAL y e, n Yremreef I—N,T, ) An nremrxf 1eliN v non You rvw o<m coo -. al o I.." 10 Nare I ern ri Pnl any of IM Prerir.on< of P. Alcoholic &&,Prep. Comrd k, m "Lotom of +e Nov.., pe.. No o-W to me A,,' Ve 11 Eaplare o "YES" om.m N Ibme 9 or to on en onocnmmr _Fr<b I,n, &e awned pwl d Ibis .,loon- 12 APo1 ... 1 o91en loi OPT _ In mw4 mP all OR I of a c< ., Poll _'b11Fer b<_l _elRIR m—op w p.rml Io b. dolelM no, el Me W- T, nl IN. AlmFalic &e ,. C.1nof AT, 13 STATE Of CALIFORNIA C_T, of _ PSwr.1Je _ __. clop ..1.124192 L AI %IUNt SIGN NERE 1Y.... n.... _ ................... ....ESC- AAaA.sun... L1c......... ... .................. APPLICATION NY YRAN94111ROR 15 STATE Of CALIFORNIA co-I, oF.. ....ei, r Elm .......... CPT...... Y.. n µl o� 16 el lkmleepi, V_Synalo_1,111 of lkmupl 1& Leenle N.mbe.01 _NemNO JIMr�.- FIC12T.'.- glqo: - 1 ?et�..:.mT -erg �� iracY L Slr shoo-- iV :- •`— •__.._.__ . T- %,`--- , pan.rurm 19 Cry ad Ep Cada Tounry l06)) Eontnill Ov1d_, Pan. Do Vol Wolf Moo, This Lim. For Mf rfmenl I Ae (hdy Ana,hed "yRnwdrd Bona, m (ollw frdvaun popen. n ......... ._ .. .... .. . ._COFlf5 F1ABE0 .L39 {91 _ .. ._, tinsel. Fee M_ ... Pad m . ... ... . ............. CFET —_._.. .___ArcxP No ..... w 0 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BACKWATERS 10677 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 APN 208 - 351 -25 Currently Zoned: Industrial Park within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan Zoning of Adjacent Properties: North: Terra Vista Planned Community, Commercial South: Industrial Park, Subarea 7 of the ISP (Vacant) East: Industrial Park, Subarea 7 of the ISP (Vacant) West: Industrial Park, Subarea 7 of the ISP (Vacant) sasse 11 - - - - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: City Council FROM: Debra Adams, City Clerk /Records Manager BY: Tony Russell, Records Clerk SUBJECT: DESTRUCTION OF CITY DOCUMENTS It is recommended that City council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). ENGINEERING Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the City Attorney and City Council. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA /tr attachment RESOLUTION NO. 9x-,22 y A RESOLLTION OF THE CITY OCFaICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONCA, CALIFORh*IA, AUTHORIZING TtE DESTRUCTION OF MY RECORDS AND DOC(ManS WHICH ARE NO LONGER RD7UIRFD AS PR' ED UNDER GOVFIiVEN'T CODE SFCPION 34090 wfff3tF3.S, it has been determined that certain City records under the charge of the following City Departments are no longer required for public or private purposes: ENGINEERING DIVISION WHERE S, it has been determuned that destruction of the above - mentioned materials is necessary to conserve storage space, and reduce staff time, expense, and confusion in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City department to destroy any City records and documents which are over two years old under his or her charge, without making a copy thereof, after the same are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are over two years old; and WHEREAS, said records have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney, NOW, THEREFORE, this City Council of the City of Rancho CUcamorga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.. SECTION 2: That the City Clerk is authorized to allow examination by and donation to the Department of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society designated by the City Council, any of the records described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part. hereof, except those deemed to be confidential. SFMON 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effe:t. tq Resolution No. 9d - * ** Page 2 M PASSED, APPROVED, and ADO= this 15th day of April, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, stout, Williams NOW: None ABSENT: Wright Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DffitA J. ADAMS, CM CLEW of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of April, 1992. Executed this 16th day of April, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk 1) RVIC.4O =k". GA 4W. ica:'r Reco -• •ec EC_L'.N:hS iE.CCR "S ARE SC—EX—Er C'R 2ES71E':; a EASE :4I :.A'. -:c ,cc,ge;G•SaOS.': C4. S; 3Y 4NC RE'2W +E RE'CC ^.:! `AYAFE!9N' '•_ ..5i "4 •: ✓ °° iE;2 R :5 _i5'E." ?n IN A- A,. •aE nc -q".: .. REC :RCS ME, N:•° AN X FOR _ WN''S :.e5,RC1 •:e oee- ..._ .. _.- ac.0 :R2S IOOR ".i9A' ^R: XY4'E. CANE Resobition No. Sji—*" Page 3 r -M WEE aER!ANE.N' REC :R2 ^,I. ,!s R, pc-a. PiAi '^X rx C.N`41 9EO:NN:NO TIONC 9^X NC. LOCA ^.04 9:x 2 ? -'99' WE EEYT 'O: ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I A9VEXA'i_._ C'/N!T '2/29! "' E _ C +` ?E" - ^? 3 '2 -19 °.4 _'iz- R lhhE %A':OY _M✓?"___b?!?'_ld_'i ".... 7.a:e: � 2fRAATNENT 4fA0 9A:e: n INS'. C;'N Arr , V' ✓e. rd. �+ '0 C511 59 IN! A OF 'RAC' 9392 "'7'.' / ++ 12/29/7+ ce- R 2 ANNEXA' :CN ^ CSA 5^_ ZONE A OF 'RACI 939' .. ^VC'. /„ 12/29/7 :NNEXA'::N 'C CSA SO ZONE A Cc 'RAC' 9399 2'/O'1+? '2/29/77 cR'!e• R C 44N?XA': :V -0 CSA SO Z045 A OF 'RAC! 94:: 2'/O!/T7 !2/29/7? AYNEXA ^.04 'I CSA 50 1M. A OF 'RAC' 949' :'/C'/ "7 12;29/7? Eci:e- t 5 ANNEXATION 'I CSA 57 ZONE_ A CE :RAC' 9'.x9 !e• R 7 ANNEXAT:ON 'O CSA 50 LONE A OF ?RAC! 9350 7.'!O' 17 12/29/7 le- R 5 ANNEXATION TO CSA 52 ZONE A OF 'RAC' 9352 ^.:!2' /7 '2/29/" 9 04EXA'104 -0 CSA 50 LONE A OF 'RAC? 935'. 2'/2'/ ?1 1212917? F"'e- t _ !VNSXA':ON TO CSA 5: ZONE A " TRACT 9359 VIC'/'7 '212917' '0 CSA SO ZONE A OF 'RAC'. 9395 - /O7/ ?7 '2129/17 :'.!e• : 2 MEW: ON TO CSA 5: ION! A It IRA :' 93?7. 2l/ :7/7 '2/29!77 -:'!e• t '? AYNEXA' :0N -0 CSA SO INE A OF 'RAC? 9379 2'/;'/77 72/29/7? :'.!e• "- ANNEXA':O4 "O CSA SO ZONE A V 'RAC' 9319 O`!C'!T '2/29/?' :'!e• 7 '5 XNNEXA':O4 '0 :SA 50 114E A IF 'RAC' 9390 0' /O' /" 12:29/ ?7 'S ANNEXA7 :OY TO .SA JO ZONE A :E 'RAC' 939' T /C'!" :2/291,1 :'Ter 7 '7 MEXAT:0 4 TO CSA 50 ZONE A V TRAIT 934 72/29177 c'!e• : '..E ANNEXA*NN 'O CSA 50 ZONE A OE IRAQ? WE :'!e^ 4 '9 MEWL N TO CU 50 ION' A V TRACT 9320 2: ANNEXATION 'I CSA 5O LONE A OF IRA." 932' T. /0' / ^' 12/2917 :TIES t 2' 04EXPION 12 CSA 50 ZONE A OF 'RAC' 9322 :' / ".'111 12/29/77 2: ANNEXATION TO CSA 50 ZONE A Cc 'RAC+ 9324 .. "'111 12/2907 :':x• ! 22 A94 EXA7I019 TO CSA SO ZONE A OF 'RAC 9325 2"2'!77 121129/77 .G AN%EXA' :ON 'O ISA ..0 IONS A CE TRACT 9337 ^'!C' /I7 S PNE %A' :ON TO :SA SO ZONE A OF TRACT 92! ^. '!'" •2!29/77 ANNEXAT :W 'I CSA SC ZONE A 2E 'RA :' 927: .'1 ".•'7' '212911" ANNEXATION '0 CSA 50 LO4E A OF 'RAC 92.15 2'17.1'1? '2/29/77 2! AN4SXA'!ON 11 CSA SO INE A OF TRAIT 92°.0 11 '2/29!77 29 ANNE_XA':0N TO CSA 50 ZONE A OF 'RAC7 9295 Q IT '2/29/11 ?: ANNSXA':0N TO CSA !a_ ZONE A Oc TRAC 9299 21!.1M 12/29/71 3' ANN -W:04 'O CSA SO ZONE A OF 'RAC' 9302 T "1 :2/29/77 ?I A49EXA7 ON 'O CSA SO LONE A :c 'RAC7 9305 V"C'/14 12/29177 :'!e• a ?3 MEW!ON -0 CSA 50 LONE A OF TRACT 9313 :VC / ?7 _M✓?"___b?!?'_ld_'i ".... 7.a:e: � 2fRAATNENT 4fA0 9A:e: n INS'. C;'N Arr , V' ✓e. rd. �+ t esolatim No. Aa%•e* Page 4 •. • :' RA'ICPA; CL'CANON6A .es :r:tt ?a. NctifintScr. Rt=" 'ACE: _ DATE: '.V ?/92 !!E: '2:13:5:: ' .N:4C RECORDS ARE M- E7.'LE". FOR 7e_STRU"!.N. ^!EASE MICATc ;Es:RE" 1!S0DS!T!.X SIGN AND RET!'RV 'O THE R-CO." r,4NAGEME.NT 0:- 4:'.!94. X ✓- -c R!=R;S _:. °•E: 9E.ON eAY AL. 9E OES -RD'E- X - RE'A!N "CH REC.RCS •AMD N:` AN X cCR %4'n.MTRC- Tut REST E,-- - :: ec>+ Re.CCRDS COORD:NATDR: WrE 2:A4E :E" NANE: c.NSIKERING /ADMIX NAIL SORT: ----------------------------------- _ --- ____.__. 1`4!: "'4:989 -195! EXT: 2323 - --- ____._. eARN DATcc ________ _.__------ _--------------------------- PERMANENT 7ECORC CTR. ______ —_�__. OSS'RV RFRISVAL nx (X1 EYE,." 7M WE4'S SEEMING C."M -------------------------------- SOX NC. LOCATION 9cx 09 -42' OVE SW 'D: __ __________�__— _________ _e- '- 34 ANNEXA': "N 'O CSA SO ZONE A OF 'RAr' 9223 ______________ 0'/3'11'7 �— ----- 12/29/'+ ------ ------------------ c`ier A 35 ANNEXATION '0 :SA SO ZONE A 0' 'PAC' 9225 1/O /77 •2729/1? a%e- t 35 ANNENA'!ON % CSA 50 ZONE A Cc TRACT 9245.934304 01171/77 12/29/77 2 37 ANNEXATION 'C CSA 57 ZONE A OF 'RACT 9255 0: /01/?i '2/28/77 cc'ee^ t 3 °. APECiA'. O15'AIDTS -CSA RITNOIGXN 01110'. 17T 12/29/1? ^'der 4 39 0NEXA "..4 '0 CSA 5O ZONE A OF TRACT 9539 0'/01/71 !2129/77 4'ter 4 4O 0NEXAT104 :0 'SA ED ZONE A OF TRACT 9'57 01/01/77 12129/11 c'dr A 4' ANNEXA^C9 TO CSA 57 ZONE A CF '9ACT 9'99 71101/71 12/29/'17 _ ASSESSE*EN+c 11,161 /17 :2129/20 " 4ED et 352 !7 -C! -O2 5 !2 -'999 ASScSSENEVS 21/0'192 '2129192 m 4EL0 ° 322 1-12 -62 2 12 -199C Mee^ t 1 AD 52 - C!/V/82 ^'der A Z :WIc.S *:GA'!ON REPORT, AD 82 -' L•'/0!J82 cede- A 3 ENGINEERS REPOR' • O' / ".'/82 ^'der A A CC95'M.'OTICN ?LAYS 0'/0!/22 cede- A 1 cL S':RMAR' VM182 c'i 21111/22 ASSESSnc4'S T /0'/79 72/29/92 n IELD n 333 Tier ^ 'S 4CBILItAT:C9 91. IMP AD 12 -' :'et• ; 2 41.'A !MOBILIZATION S'CT4' GRAIN AO 92 -' 01/0!/79 c'dt- ; . !2.' CLEARING i aR V.4G ST. M.AC 32-1 'c'ee^ : ! !. °.OA ";EAR19E i SAU891NS AC 82-' 0!/0!;79 -.'!or x !3.? EAR'4NCAX AC 92 ;1/0!;79 A 5 43.: SOJR:E 1 !VFNIc A.C. AAVEMNT 9'. IMP. 01!01779 AL 4A ASPNALT CONCRETE STDRN DRAIN AC 82 -' 01/OV79 °:l:e^ A E 48.5 SASE ROC2.9TREE' IMP AC 82 -' I /01/01/79 Date: Qom'/ OSPARTMN:4' READ Oep: A89'. C^e ' 22 !2/29/92 12/29/92 12/29/22 12/29/92 !2/29/22 '2/29182 '2/29/82 '2/29/82 '2/29/82 '.2/29/82 '2/29/82 12/29/82 12/29/12 12/29/82 7,t Resolu im No. Or*" ` pap x; r C'__CN:NS " : ? ^v' ARE SVED :5: c;R ^ES'4::':^C. e:EAS? iN :iCA °E n:S :qry �':SKS :7. 4 E, ?V }!1? ?! ":2: 'C °ve RECORDS VANAGENF I 'l:5:$ X -e"c ?E :'R:5 ':S'_. DEN °c DES -Rnv?n X.- ?E'Ai4 ' -rSE RE..R:S •AlIc: 'd:'- Al X -CR !'N'MS..'ES'TJ" "e 4eS• .. __ .. 1521 ?ECDROS CCCRDNA'CR: 1i.'.°'E. O!ANE :ED.. ,. :ES' VA °5: ER£; YfER:XSlA DN!N W. SORT: PR:WE: (+'11919 -15' W: 2?C? VfRR DA'ES 'E"ANE]T RE= C79. ?ES`10' 4E'R :EVAL 57% X1 EVEN' 4CX ^C;W'E"5 SES:Y!1!NS END!NC rX NC. LCCA?'.CN SR n. ? -199- WE REY' 'C: -------------------------------------------- _ --------- — ------------------ ! / --------------------------------------- ° !!.SA AESR!CA °E SASE: STRC! DRAY _ - 2 15.° S .'.RCS :':OPEN' "95 'A' CJAE OVC'!T9 '2/29142 °2,¢e• 2 " 4S.7 SD:'R:c_ : ^C9!5N' CARS AND '4' W—ER C'! ^.'. / ?9 !2/29/82 •• ¢ '2 85,? 5x4:5 DCC.'w4T CURD A." 24' ^SUT R ° "O' /79 !2129/82 .'Fe• a " le 9 D.C... °!HWAL4 "1/O ?1!9 12/29/82 ¢'¢e• i 39.'O SC9c_ VRCCCC ^ ^.'W4' S' °CC DRIVE AP°RCACR 21^J! /T9 12129/82 °o'ae- 4 'f 1° " A.:. DNS C'R'/19 !2/29182 °:'ac a 'S 19.'2 ' X 1' R90D READER ^ -•! ^. •,M9 12/29182 %!dl- c " 3!.'3 S *L" NAVE 51--NS 21/'.!119 52/29132 ]!.4 ¢.CD SI'm ?! /:!M9 12/21/82 °:'¢e• a 'S 38.'! 'RA °G:C NARXER '4' TTPE C' /C'M9 !212!/12 !4.'5 'Wa!C 4ARO 'C' . 05 1'!C1M9 12/29/82 y'_e. 2 2 So,•+ <c• 80.:1' Li4R DER,! D' /C!M9 72/29112 z' "e^ = .. 39.'4 '+.:. ".. %- GL "•ep n. m5/T9 !2129/82 _':e- F .. ee.'9 5.'.'4:1 OCCLW R'S 5' °CC DAY_"' _ O' /19 '2/21122 :'RD* SARRICAOE O' /O'/19 12129/82 -:'Ce• ¢ C? e5 1. ACJ'JS' E %5:S ?:4G MNR SS 'C GRADE C' /O! / ?9 !2/19/82 25 :8.22 RA!SS NA'c.R VALVES 'O 4RADE D!!O' /n9 '2/29192 :':e• 2 C9, 2? AC:J °.' c%S ?57!X2 594ER C:EANCT 'C GRADE "1/79 '2/29112 b':er a ^S 1! ?i <. DyC SLEEVE C' /:: /79 '2/29/11 ' .er : 25 SC -. /C RYC CAPS °:' ?e• R DD l9.:' SENER ENCASEMENT ':e^ a ?• er, 2? "C 4O° !9CCO! C.mvrR 12!29/02 SE.?i 19' RCP f9c.OD5 D' /•'!19 12/29192 °:':e• • n 1°.e! 7e' RCP !'DSn.7! : ? /D! / ?9 1129/82 11' 111 :':z• 2 '< ,? ec. gCD 'c2nC' :' /;' /T9 12129/12 55• RCR !t!D 'C' /'9 12129/82 12!29/82 -:'.a, g ?9 !? 55' RCD !Inn! �� a :':e• 9 75 ! °,!S !I' °,¢ 1054 °'' of /:''179 :2/29/52 x °:':e• a SD 1°..i: !?' RCD !'99 °•O? C'!OS /19 12/29/92 .F ':':a• F ILL: 5 :'4C° ,.. en2, /O' / ?9 !2/29/12 4 52 1o.59 c! F9 n89CC5 :'/21(79 12!29192 be• F 5? 41.!C ! ' RCD �!OCCC` ^' ±C +/]9 1129142 n • nC0 C . 4S AI .\ A4'N.4 _A. Deah ASS'. C:'• A" _ '•/ Resolution No. A'"' Page 6 .,. :c RANC4C CC4AVCNSA Des :rx:'Lr. No:e5a:2:`:^ Rea.• 'ACE; - CA' ?: 2 ?1^./92 -^VC: 1.9X!42 RE:CROS 490 5T- .5W.EO °4R OES'q!!C ".CX. MAE::q :A'E lYn gongq *" ,J5 ?EM9CS VWSE'.AEN' :.- V:S: :':. MRS '_:S "EC 9 ON VP A:'. -E OE5797.en X--RE-A!4 - . E RE.:R:S VARXEO N:-" AN X cO4 'K'4- °S,2Ee-ROy ,u1 gc57 'S ?' RECOM ^'ORO:4A7 -R: W-`1- ::AYE ^c o• . !cn .c0. NAPE: E95:NEERM /AONIN VA *- SOR1: VA ?X WE- (x' E. -. cC4 .94.11'5 O ^°^,44:42 E\:':1S r oIiME: ;1!S `999 -'9S SX+: 2302 +ERNA4.e9' RE:ORO 7'R. 2SS'ROi RS:RI -0 !.OX SOX ND. - MA'lCN S.X ^. °. -!5S' DA'E SER' ,. .'7e^ L !! . °..Si ! >' 4C0 i •..nm C. /r•nR !2!29/9? :e- II .2' PC'+ '2/29/82 ,!,a- R t° t1- ?3 42' RID 7.79^.9, O. / ^y+9 •2!29/82 c2':e^ R !7 S9 74 35' RCP " "n. :D: '7'/79 72/29/82 d'de' F t8 45.9' 24• i^a i'04 : :' ".' /0'. ^9 '2/29192 c:'de7 F 19 19.95 .V• 910 1242C0.1 ".'/4'/19 '2/29/82 c:':e• F c.0 45.'^ -n NA!W.OLE AX 4'/4'/ +4 ;2/29/82 ca!de,^ 9 5: 41.18 O.C.C. ?•PE M!!AR "' :'179 :2/29182 c:'.Le• A 52 Mll.' 4C.0 0791 EN^_ASSAIS' 7!/C'/79 !2/29/82 cede. R c? !V.. - ?' -RAYS S'RLC'Dgr 01R SIT 15' c; de^ a St M'22 1!1,gMON S'4.': ^.'RE -A' S5 15.'3" 5' OWN !!9N c59CE PEA SSEM 5: -95 21/2•/'9 12/29/92 55 4°..'4' 5T, rC I.35n.D! 47/C'/79 42/29/82 �'dar 1 5+ 15.12 OC'LP S'R:'C".'RE Al S.'AS'!: USIA "'!:1119 '2/29182 49.7 CON'RACT 14ANG5 ME?" CV:1119 !2/29/12 i de^ R 59 59,2 O.C.O. 42 RMIEE'ER AVE. " "C'!79 12129/82 d de^ F SC 'S.+ ..:. 1? OAI7 EX'RA 100" REPOR+ O' /C' /'9 '2/29/92 :'2e• t E t9.'. .O. 17 WRA *RR RS?OR7 ^'/O'/'9 '2/29/82 0'La- "- .2 49.2 :. O. we 'RADERARX S' S.C. :' /C' ^9 11'29182 S3 S2.' IMEC' INVOICES S WARRANTS !4CNNM4 5469. 7' /O' /79 12/29/82 c.!de- R 54 52.2 ORC.'EC' INVOKES i NARRA.N`S NP LDAN ASSOC. :!14'179 12/29/12 :':er 4 45 52.3 ORGEC7 NMICSS 6 eARRAN+S NP !IMSOM S SC4N P /O7 /79 12/29/82 c:':a^ 1 c.5 c.2.! ORC.'EC7 ! NVOICES i A.D. AO.SM:ATen SNSq. !,• /ee 72/29/82 e- R S' S2.5 PR2:EC' !MCES S WARMS MRARD V ^.S ASS 7'/71/19 '1129182 6e 52.5 PRO:EC' INVOICES 6 NARRAN'S R!'2 CANERA 1' /01/ +9 12/29/82 4 S9 E2.+ PR02EC7 :9Vn!cES 6 XARKYR•S V = " - / ^.' /'e 2/29/92 :':e• 4 '" 5? 9 PAOlEC7 ALL4'ERE9; :9YO:CEE 6 xARAY-5 CrySE : :v :' ^9 12/24!!2 _ye. ^• c^ 1 OW.EC' !4VOICES 6 WARRANTS c:c OlAY. RD AOO "'I'M 1129/92 e- L .2.' ^. C4AAe0 m uRC.EC* :NVO!Cc.S 6 XA4RAY'c V!SC. '2/29/92 C4A.RGES •n 199:5[' K'- n'!VCW V!.c .D42 ':'; 10 12/29/1-2 !NVO!CES A' i S'4YCC ^'14'!74 '2/291 °.2 c:'de! 4 75 S2.'? ;YYC:CEE- SOYAOIVAN- VCCAIN 6 O.C. 7!! ".'/19 12129/82 ::a• R ?5 E2.'t !NY ^.ICc.S-CCND D'!0' /'9 12129/82 53.' *1 'Als 6 PECS SA!E 9ECEIP'S 7vC' /19 12/29/12 It 1-5.' NCRX34EE- 4a:e: 'SDA87N"' MEAD Dace: IA Te. nr. L� Imaolution No. W" Pas 7 .. IV OF 4ANCR0 COCA". SA IIN, Cest ^ac..r NctiffeWo•, Rew— OaGE: Wn "3/" 1/92 -cc c_ LCX:N'G RECORDS ARE SCPE7 .E0 mO nc5.4L'C':Ok. OLc_ASE '. -xe DEEM' . 'SIDS:': CV. STS .4 ANC RETURN TO '!IS RECORDS IIANAGEVEV .. 'E:ON. Y,_�p4_ 4c_COQ " ^_E _!5`EO 4EL0M vAY ALL SE OES'RD'E_ X RE'A:9 Dui" 4c_CCRCS eA,RNE9 W!'F AN X COR VC4^ S.OES *ROY ''E RES' _. . -.. REC,OROS COORDINATOR: INVTE. 7:ANE OED' . .c3, 'EP' VANE: EN MEMNS /AWN VA!' SORT: _ S.R.. an c !7 „N : -'15' IN': 3 3 2 0 +ARY, 'ATES ------------------ OOROANENT RECORD CTR. :ES'RO`' RS'R!SNAL 9CX 'XI EVES" _______________________________________________________________________________ 9OX CONTENTS SEIMNE IN0!4S rx NO. LCCA'!ON 9cx _____,__________- :2-'99' DAIS SIN' 'C. h'de• = 19 E.5.2 NARRANT :BEETS V /0'/'9 ____- 12/29/O.P _________ ________ -: ve. p ". C/T9 :2!29/62 cOlde• : I..' OP C. ^IT SPESTS C7 /0'/09 '2•'29192 "c'der S 32 5'.' OROGRE55 PAYMEN' e0474LY +•mr r +9 !2:29/92 code• t _3 I'.2 'ONT:RG".lY 9'A :'S SHEETS C! /0'/ ^8 72/29/12 cc'der N 94 52.7 C:T!Zl N CLANS "V19 72/29/12 Ocice• C 85 52.2 OQ5 iv!NARY XOTiCOS 01/C' ^9 12/29/82 cO'der i 95 5D.' cTNAL REPORT 0_ nIM !2/29/12 coder t 9T IE ID CLOSORE DERM!'E O'. /01/99 !2/29/12 ASSESSEVENTS :1/21/92 12/29/92 •• •S n n 335 r5- ^.'-03 ? 12 -190 c'de• t AO 12.7. "'x9'/12 12!2912 :'der 8 2 '.2.' ^ev SPENT AN YNs ORGECT-O!XE :CMG 07/01/92 12/29/82 de^ t 3 '.A RESVIIi'F 8 APDL !CAT!0R5 0 1101/82 !2/29/82 INSOSVOR 0ROP05ALS 21/01/92 12/29/82 -c'ce- • c 2.0 PROJECT OFF! CE -EP.' '!OMEN' AND SL'PMES O11C1192 12/29/12 'c'der A 5 54' SENE.RAL CORRESPONDENCE TO C!TY 0!10!/92 12129/12 c-":dr t 1 5.2 GENERA. CORRESPONDENCE 'ROM 0!P' C1 /0/92 !2/29/12 4'der 4 9 L9 SMRAL CORRESPONDENCE "O S Iry T!L!'° CO. O'/01112 12/29/12 c,'oe• t e -.2 SEVERAL CORRESPONDENCE 10 CQNTRACTORS 0' /0!/12 12/29/12 -:'de• t • ^, 5.3.' SENERAL CORRESPONDENCE TC CO•N'RAVORS O!/C'/92 12/29/82 Ocice• 2 5.3.2 GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE TO Cg3TRACTOR O! /Y /12 !2/29/82 Oder ; '2 5.4 GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE FRO!! WRAC'OR 12/29/82 c_•de_ . •.0 5.' GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE TD 5 ORON O'NSR AGENC: 0: /O1/92 12/29/12 :'der 1 Y 5,9 18TER_DlIV WOOS 12/29/12 Oe- a 'E E.'C GENERAL CCRRSD 10 5 c" COVTRAC'CRS ORE-2:O O /:'!22 12/29/82 c_ .e- •r RETURN REC, S S:SNED CCO!ES OF A0n_EV M t! :'/0'/82 12/29/92 -:'de• - '" •_.'2 REC. . Rc'7RNEO CARDS. AND RE ^:RNE.O S!GNEC COO ml,r /S2 12/29/02 0 SE -9AL CORRESPO_N054CE TO S PROM CONSL'L'AN' O' /O: 192 12/29/92 c:'de• t !9 E '2.' SEVERAL COR9E5PONDENCS '0 S -QV C09:VL'AN' O'/V/92 12129/12 20 5,'? "_I9E4AL CORRESPONDENCE TO S I" CONSULTANTS 0.1/1!/82 12/29/92 cede- P 2' 1.' OO!19TRUCT!ON SURVEYS: S'Rcc. +!<e O' / ^! /AZ !2/29/82 cc'dtr t 22 9.2 CONSTRL:'!N SURVEYS: STORM ORMN SUDS VESTS '!/0'/92 !2129/12 .* av , -------------------- -- r Catr: dM XPARTMENT HEAD .An: ASST .:!^' AT, 911 e,# IS <T. Resolncicn No. 91-*— Page 8 .° RANX CUCAM.1YCA DtGE: 3A•E: 2?/.,!92 11GN:YE RE.CRCS ARE SC9EDClEC -2R 3a R:'CT!ON. DLEASE ac ;cc!Rcn ,, SanSn L4, 1S4 W RD.'DR4 TO 'PE RECngSS MANAGE1E9' ;.- V13'M. x_ E RE..R.S !S'E' -E-Ow 4A. A.I. ! ^SRC° X--RE-A:4 _ "CSE RECCRCS MARKED 'N!"- AN X :OR c " N`S M RV TIE RES• R'_.CR75 .O.R M'N: N11 °'E. C!W eP• !S27 ;e DT 4ANE E4G:4EER:RG /AD4:4 MA:'_ SCR': f7'!1229-'!S' EX M2 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________ MARK Xis 'ERNANEN? RECORD C'R. M-R.v RE'VEYA', SOX :X' D_V.0 \' SIX .D4'cy.5 ecS;RN!VG EYDiVS 9Cx 4 ^. LDCA704 9a DD. -'99' "ATO. v4' c;•.e. q -> v , 'RAH S-E`S: 'roc 'A' CDR! 3 CU'R9 LITE' e. /n !S2 12/29/92 SLCDE AK :4G: S'4EE'S 3'/:'!92 '2/29/92 D:!:e^ 4 25 9.5 5:'RVE'DA C!A3v cucc.c .'! ^.1/92 '2/29192 25 3.5.' 51.RVE °C4 C!ARv ceee'S ,.� "V42 '2/29/92 2' 0..c. S'_ODE STAKES !•u ec C9AY9c 01/0'1e2 12129/92 c_•,a¢. A 2! S., 4'D.C. SURVE'S P /D'/92 12129/92 'de• . 2: ..' M!S.. °S':4A'ES 6 CALC.D VIV /92 12129/92 er A 3D :.2 X- <crT!CNS: S'4EE' !NPRCVSM"'S '.V9'/92 !2/29!82 t ? '2.3 .M'RACT CRA4GE CRCER- W'RMYEFS 2'/ 0'192 '2129192 :'ier 4 ?2 CO9`RAC? OOC:'NEN'S 6 SPEC iAL >9DY25!D45 'D'/92 '2/29/92 33 '�3 40'!CE C° ANARC OF CONTRAC' D'171/82 '2/29/92 CCN'.4AC' ACCE4CD4S C'!D'!92 '2.'29/81 -c1 te- t 35 .E 4C'!CE C' DRCCEEC C'/D1192 12/29182 -c 'e- t 'S S ^9N'RAC' ';'CL'4E41 !SSUED. 'C '!S' C'!42 '2/29/92 ve. t 3' • e!^ OPEN! @C N-O V /0' /92 !2/29/e2 39 '.9 CMTRAC' DRCPCSAL AC:USTSP D'/DI!92 '2/29192 20 • 9 PRE- CMS'UC'!M VIC. M!R:' 'ES C!1D1/92 12/29/92 Cer f iD .. CONTRACTORS C'RGANIZAT!ON S NAD!NAN- MCCA :4 V/8'/92 :2/29/92 'S.' A.C!DEN' REPORTS D. /n 1!ei 12/29/92 11/1'192 12129/82 42 16.2 CONST. "AN' AGREE.MER'S ^.1/ ^•1192 12/29.!9! N:SC. AGREEMENTS „/ ".'/82 12/19/82 _. 1.4 4!S.. !NVRANCE CCCL'NEN'D_ DV^1 /e2 12/29/92 IS '9.5 M!SC. S".. 3RNG. 'D' /42 12/29/e2 :'Der A -.' DESIGN 4CD:4!CA1'CNS "'/ ^'/ °2 12/ 29!92 1.2 4!SC DRMCSALS ^'!D "02 12,129/92 e9 '2,3 SHOP ORAN:9^E ^''4^ '2/29/92 '2!29/92 . S.2 1E4T!c'S: DAYRC:'S 9ELC2A1 - AEANOV:C° C' /C'!D? '2129!92 c':e• = -' 25.? ENPLVEE :N'ERV!ENS ^'! °.2 12/29/92 °c':e• t 51 ZE . '= 0•!c!cn DAYROLLS -LGR CCNS'4:'C':CV ^.'1:'/42 12/29/02 0.! 2c ° "cR•!c!ED PAYROLLS- cON'ANA 00:45 6 :OPN CCLC ^'.1'192 '2/29/82 55 2c..S C04':c!E^ DAORD:LS- A11DR4 DSNCc D•!r�:S2 12/29192 :'Der 9 55 2R + Cc4 "D'4C DA °iCL15 -AN4Ei S'DEL V /1'/92 12/29/92 t':e• .' 25.'nnC''ER'! E7 PAM aS- K7ME9- MCGREN //: Date: +w 1 CEDARTMey. Meng Date: .. A'• �7ASS'. LP Res olutim No. W * ** page 9 .. Y OF RANCMC CJCAMONGA Cee:__ ti.n Uti'NOat'.or. Re.... P_'_XN1 RECORDS ARE SCucrii E^ 'OR DE.S'RL'C"i.N. O EASc';NO7CA's c 'ES:RE^ ^: °SOS ^:C4. S:14 ANO °E';';4 '1 "1E RECORDS MAMAGEMEN' 9.!- VIS:14. Y.X a ?_C7RCS ::- -_ E -:N +A° A'- SE 'ES•RCYE, Y >E -A:N MIKE RE,CRCG •ARKEC n:` 49 X FOR rvq'uE.2ESTROY T�E RES' E' C 952" RECORDS CDCRC:NA'OR: Nu'TE. C:ANE ±cr M, :co' WE: E9GNEERNG /AOMI9 MA:. SCR': 1`9E: : :7'4M9 -'85'' EXT: 2393 BARK CA'ES 'E"ANEN' RECORD ".7R. DESTROY RETRIED!. SON •N •. cVc4- SON C941E9'S 9EG!RN:RS ERDiNG SOX 10. _OC'A^.L'N Sox 18-'99' WE SEN' __________________________________________________ ___ ___________ _________ ________ .. 25.E CER'^c:ED 0AYRO..S-RIVERS:D° C9NS'RL'C'.I9N CO. "'/ :'/ °.2 12129/ °.2 59 25.'1 aAYRCLLS- ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS :'/C'192 '2/29/82 52 25." CE9T:`i EC oAYROL .5 C.:. DAV!S CC. 2!/01/82 12/29/92 o'Ea- 7 S' 2E.1 OROGRESS SCHEDULE_ ^'/21/92 !2/29192 ce•ae^ 9 12 21.' NE.EK.v S'A'Erc4* OF KRKI4G DAYS C111!/82 12129/82 ISSESSerEN'S :'/17/92 '2/29192 " 4E D " 358 1e -01_03 A !2 -1990 Faller b 2 ASS::SME9' 7!STRTCT 82 -1. "9 'a! '92 '93 '9D 1! /C! /82 o':e' a 3 AGREEMENTS An 82 -' 2'/01/92 a- 7 A An 82 -' R!SHT OF NAY A..!S!T! N 17/C1/82 c:':e^ 7 E AD 92 -' -AVE 1'CT AGREEM.W.- 07/1'./8.2 E'CRM CRA:4S AND E'CCC CCN'ROL " /0Te 1-9 a HER :REEK 'en 01 /0+ /1 - :'W I 2 CL'CA!!CNGA 'REEK '91 v /D7 /19 E :1de• a I CL'CAMONGA CREEK AM12ITI04 '80 CV97 /78 :':r b a ^- L'CA"M :REEK '79 ".'/!1/79 E:'de' a S DAY CREEK 2'/0:/'8 E.'der b 5 CAY- E*IMANDA CREEK STEER!YG 9O"! T'EE-M!N/AGMCAS 11/C1/18 Edc r C DAv- E?2NANOA CREEK 'EC RN ICA. COMMI "EE- MIN /AGSNDAS c.'Cer 7 8 DAv- ET!XANOA CREEK TECR ^.^JIML "EE_4!N /AGE99AH b2 -:':e^ 7 - DAY- ETINANDA :REEK DRAT' RERCR'S 'e." 1' /0' /18 CCN'ROL 9MEFIT ASSESSMENT EO4!86'LA '9' O1 /C1/78 DAY CREEK- RTINANDA CREEK SYS'E!':'.E CORRESR. C' /C' /18 CREEK '91 s:/m /le ':e• • •? CEM'VS 1A045' '78 C!/07/18 o':e^ a 1 DEMMS CY ME'. '19 1! /C! /18 DEvENS CNANNE. '8C 27/0'/18 d r a 'S ;EER CREEK '79 C'/C'178 !2/29/82 !2/29/82 '2/29/82 !2/29/92. 2129/82 15- 01 -8.2 9 '2 -'.993 !2/29/9' '2/29/8! !2/29/8' !2/29/8! 12/29/8' '2;29/9! '2/2918! '2/29/8! !2/29/8' '2/29/8' '2/29/8' 72/29/9' 72!29/9' '2/29/81 '2/2978' Date. J� ^58ART4W uEAD Oam ASST 2'I Rd DlOtim No. 9} * ** Page 10 C:" OF RA9VO 'U.'XK'IGA Oes :ruC :SCn tic.' aNCr Re:Cr• 9A7: D3!" /9? 'PE F. 6'V':. i:COROS ARE 3CHE7U'an mR 3E5'RL':T!:V. e'EA4 °_ :VD:CA" °E DES: RE °: ' ^S "CS!Ti09. S:SN AND RET7R4 10 'PE RECORDS •ANAGEMSV' D!- `J!5:04. X uc -Is ^ORDS -IFE^ 9ELON W ALL SS DES'R^.'ED X__R'_'A:V 'eCSE RECORDS +ARKED W71 AN M FDR MCI *PS.DES'ROv +cc RES• S:: ' : 452' RECORDS CCOROM'OR: WYI.::AYE :` - °' 153' ----------- ___________________________________________________________________________-------------------------------------- :Ea' 4A'!E: SAG:4EER!4G /ADR4 vAiL SCAT: -M CA'ES PERVIEVT RECORD C'R. 1'_9-ROV RE- I!EVAL NX Y' EVEY- _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 90X CCHp14'S 95V4N!4G E4D!45 PCX v0. CCA' :CS 9Cx "1.-'99' DA'E S'_+" __- ____- _- _________________ -___ v S'C%' DRAM AND '!COD CCV'-R:; C /^ -: /SS '2/29185 sr -KC n 25' 'S -00-031 '2-199e c'Ce• B "ICA 57CRN DRA:4. AD 82-' 9'/ ^7/9'. 12/29/95 «- ..A'sc V/0 1,19E 12/29/86 :'der B 3 SRO; EC' PERSO"EL 0'/'.'/85 '2/29/96 Fo'de• B ! ECL!"EN' AND PERSONNEL COST REPORTS O' /7'/!5 12/29/86 7-'de- A '- 3BEAA.:ORRESPONCEM 9'/81/95 1212919E 5'de^ B 5 :CISTRUC'M SURVEYS 9'/81/!6 12/22/86 ' ^!der A I :4'CRMAT:N A' IS START OF ORC;ar' 01/O!/85 !2/29/96 1n74er A 9 LASOR COMPL:ANCE 9'/01/85 :2/29/9'. 9 WEE%:° STATEMEI? OF KRUMO DAYS ;'17!/85 '2/29/86 'Clde• Y '^ SC:_S .aS. ^t /a!/9! !2/29/85 1C'der A 4C ^. CE 01 4A'ER:ALS '0 95 :$E7 9'./0!199 12/29/96 =C'de- i 'C ASS'. RE RSDOR'S 01!0!/85 !2/29/BE C'"er 1 13 :CIIRAC' ^.PAIGE ORDERS ; : /D' /8'. 12/29/85 lade- 9 1 aRELM 9!/1'1'5 '2/29/9S c`de^ M 'S oROJEC' RECORD ITEM SHEETS :' /0'/85 12/29/06 1C1der ? ' °. 'S':MAfE 6 CONIMENCv - STA :'S 0!/ ".'/85 12/29/86 'c!de^ M 'r Q1'ORT OF COMP ETION "!01/85 :2/29/99 r c'CRv DRAINS AND 1:000 CON'ROL O'/0'/81 :2129M a ur_^ wa 215 '6-03-O? d !2 -1989 R ' AL'A IOMA CHAYNEL, AD 94 -2 1:'Cr c 2 LASOA COMPLIANCE /1.E0 2 'AE Lv STATEME4' WCRY!4G DPS ':e• : _ NC'!:1_ 0' MA'ER:AL LEE' o'der R S ASe!!A:' CONCRE'a ':'de• : '. eORTIAN ::EMEN C09CRE7 :'de• A ^ :N:'JCCI'ROL TES'S 'C!de^ F CONCRE'E 6 RE!4FDME7 c-cc :'der a 9 1C:'_S SMG:9EERS REDORTS ASS'. RE 7AI: REPDR'S __---- Oe:e: 1_ 7EPAR'M9N' BEAD 0'/0!/81 `2/29185 !2129/86 12/29/95 '2/29/ee '2/29/86 !2/29/9E !2/29/86 !2/29/85 '2/29/86 1 "c RAN CNO CUCAMONGA `es:r :Nmm Nattt ?caC.u. Aemc 'ASE: :ATE :31'7/92 'M; !2:4k'9C - -DN :NS RECDRC5 ARE SCuMLED OCR CESTRLN!T:ON. P' WS 19 ":CA" CWiE' :S'CS :' :ON. S:SN AND RETORN TO ^!E RECORDS NA.NAGSMENT D'- 'l:S:CN, N `5 RECORDS 25TEO BELOW NAY A0. BE 7ES'RrM2 X R5. -0 `SE RECORDS tARXEO W:'4 AN N FOR NONTNS.`SSTrY TWc RES' SI LL .^: I53' RECORDS COORDINATOR: NWrE. DIANE Ccs• . 153+ 'SOT SAME: S4rINEE2I9G /ADR!N NAIL SCR' ---------------------------- -------- •------------- •---------------- •ARx ;AYES 'X' 'YEN" BOX CCNTEN'S 9COMING ENDING --------------------- -, ------------------ _------------------------ 0-ONE LOS . 7CN'RAC7CHANGE ORDERS c'ce- ¢ '7 DROJEC' !'.ER SWEE'S c'ca :• A ! ORDTESTS 8 OWNS ERPWlutiCn No. 90-*** raga u AD c °CNc: ( 71¢1999 -'16: EX': IM' PcR!A.NENT RECORD `TR. CESTRCY RETRIEVAL BOX BOX ND. LOCH ^CN 9mx CB-199' DATE SERT -- .__ --- — ---- --------------- _------------------- _____ O'/0!!9a '2!29/38 V/D!/94 !2/29198 7!/D'/8{ '2119/86 5 "CRS' "- -RAINS AND `LOCO CONTROL 01/0114 12/29/96 a 4ELD w 359 !7-O! -02 • !2 -7918 - .7:97 AD 91 -2 WOVIA !2/29/18 ST ".Re' DRAINS AND FLCOO CONTROL D! /OlM 12/29196 as 4ELO ss 351 17_01-e2 2 !2 -19es S AD 91 -2 :1• ^_!/86 !2/29/96 Data, �. DEPARTMENT HEAD Darr A69 A, WEY E!!GI9LE BOXES ON 40LD BOXER ,NEEDING TD BE RE :'RNED FOR DESTRVC'!OW D BOXES TO BE 'ES'ROY!D ?I.- ,:?cs?ra cwst mhlch must tt RETJRNEOI •• Rewlutim No. 9a-* ** Page 12 ..:_- n ..c>g5; -::Y .: V !Y: i ° - ^J4 -. • =c aco�.pne v /YlScrSy -r: - __:S: :Eln" -Apv[n .Y: -'_ IN Y :,0 My,VS• ,i F _ 7. v' S1'?4'- ery O ^4'EY'E 4cS!Y4:4G EV0:N2 __________________________ ___________________ ____________ i :Ap!'A :rePnyerey.5 CRa:E:'E 121?9 1e. rvnyc. .r-: . ? :S ,EpvAYEY- ?EC^RO :•P. OSS'7^v RE- ?:EY2'. Sax 9Cx v.. _CCe ^7. Ea. ,. -'99' 7A'E S'N, '-. ?21 ,<_r? O? , 12_192. - '.x' A �/V :N SvS- cE- CCN'4AC' 2 r0 CER9 1LLgvp •r2C ,':e• - F ;A'15 -OY Sv5'cr-OM'RAC' ? _A:RC C0Y5'RCC':C4 :•!n•/e: -:':e• A , C -RC -2 ?ASEL:Ne, ,•!n. rag e• A ' .CRRESRORCENCE ISVA 1919 `.' /C' /90 :':e• ?rpRGEvav CC9'4Aa' S pRCP ^SAUro rp/pg ON Vs'. U"w !N'CRNAI:n 10'/90 -e• A +n :VAR AVE -ARROW -C 9ASc,L:4'E '!!RIS RMVA' :•!n. mg. -'.p• : • vAR ny evS reE + S,R, " r2n SASE::4'e rOAV S DEER CRceyi C?SR:S RPM- 2 -'u S-. ISIVNCA. 'Av S Cc_ER "�11 EIR!S R!wVA. IC I .. '2e- A - 'r /: ':NANCAI IN SvS.RECCNS' AL `!ASC,H '19- ._ - '2 5.'110 FINAN9A' 04 S °S.RECCNS'. 5.2. Cnv-V /r•/rC :t• - WON A' CA? CREEK !CN VSIM OHM RPCVAL I .. t I ^,.ARNE'_:AS :C4 Svc.! rn 19" !)-S!S RE-CVA :'!n• /rr ':e• A 1 IN M7EV 4!SC S -RSE'S - NV :C' /E7E0 .. ' ^O OR0S�RAM /-:4A_ C.A:r ..,' / ?: - :2 :-;C-' .vAN NCR" n Yny,c V :E -1' ,•!e- :':e• : ?? SvS'EE- {SN' ?AC' ' :7CN5:':.A ?SCY .. DRO:c:'c 0 Q. t 3:0% . -9 -° n V4Z'A '0"-Svc ORI'iC..vc vcAS' /: •. /p; --':e- A ? SE.VERAL p4C'e:':CN :1 ! ^,'/9 ^. - ?e' e e ic^ •.._ ... ..:AVOIGA 'WE. •re: -' :e• 2 E ':RD,L ^'SE S'.-- !''LS;OS 'n DEARS rnee.aV'.Q!RE ice, E V::'9P:A S14E gcc_5vc'ry PER, VREPAIR, / /.. Ctma 4� 2EIARW41 vEA- :ate: ASS. •v a :;n - , 30 '1/29!9: 2'29!9^ '2!29!10 '2/29/222 '2/29/90 '2/29/1^ '2/29!rn '2!29/9: '2/29/9"_ '2/29/9: !WPM '2!29/9: '2/29/2" '2/29/?C ?129/9". '2!29/90 .2 r29,2g .. Cc RANrur 7_'AVCNEA >?:OR :E eRc 5_ :.:' n c c 0EE'R'.'C'!C.N� r. cAcc :50:3A -E .. c'05• ` ° « :e' -' ^V i:3V 140 ?E'�R9 "C -DC gervPOi vA9AGevey. "t r JE -c RECOq °.S :5'c3 9 .ON A+AV A ?E 9E5'R ^ -v E. " -:SE RE : :RSS VARRc_O 4" AN X cOP vC415.m'RCv -uo RES' _ _ .. •525 RECD ?0E C^eR.r: VA -nD, vnvi ev _ -: CI .. 1525 SD' 40G: -E4G. 'RAFc.CV9E5:04 " vC: SCR': ___ ____ ________________ _____________ ____ ___________________________ v1?X TES ?0X :C+N.cN -c F!C!44!4G EN02N9 IAB hTti091 Ho. 5a - * ** Page 13 „'ONE: !PS;999-10E' EX': 2G2i DERNANE4? 7EC0P9 C'P. eve +q0v RE'g: EVE'. EC.0 SCX N0. 01A' :0N 9Dx 0.0 -'SS' 3A'E ca_ -':E- "- ?et•Ay- OARNE'_:4'r ': ?:RY_ SDT'LOER 3RA9E -. __ Ee 2DC!RE 'OFc_cvSrcN oSRVA4EN' REDA:R! ,•!. °119^ 9 CARNE-11k . 'uCROUC -!R5: ' /51/99 AcXeAL; 9 SWAN S van S:n.w C.cc_cvE Dcq, RE04 :R 04/0'/99 t - cENA AOMYE0 :5R5 •97, nvc Evgrn +• m+!AD t . L rAN AVE. 9ASEL:NE -WA'E VISTA Cec -SYS DER' RED 3' /n•. 1eC :'ie• f ". RE: '•:'._ CCL'N'Rv 0'09 Occ_SyvrEN DERV REDA!R e^ .n °cRV05A- 9ASc' -'yc C- =A 0VE_SYSIV DcRP REDCR D':a• : RVE ?- IR4C11 4'. -^ 0 °CVCD 0,,- SYS ^Ev ocg4 RFDA:g ". 10''90 vANZA4:'1 9 RMX WASH Occ_SvSnN -ERV REOCR 9 l-v -4E 4V0 A._ MI. OF--FS OERN RED. ..ASIS, E•Rcc' ! v: SvIAN? ncc_EvSrn DERv Rc0AIR 22 ALNONC 9 VIA DAAI50 OFF- SYS ?E4 DERV REPAIR 01/011/90 5c':e• :2 w:_SON 9 A.'A iM CREEK nec_SvS Degr REOA'D "11191/59 e.: 2e K"!' 9 SAY SEVACE OFE -Svi DERV REDA:g o'De• : 21E :vUROF 6 YYSSOP ':e- • 29 4'_'A _!-A DAR'! -A'qn DEBRIS _e. a 019 .cvR!S /D40'crnyE �1aC :':e• : 29 VAq:OL'E _c?R:c. 7"AN - 120 =.M-1 :,,T/!: 3^ :CN'v V!SC DREYEN':VE 'ATM "(NS D :v0RCVEVc4.i 04n EC.E !:' / °.: '2!291°.^. 329 EcvA '95 ", tENS 4R -:C'cc ,C•!aC A 3 :E?R:G ?EvOVA: -0cc EvS'EV OAVASE S!'RVEv qMR' I '!40 "S'p OceR:S gEAMYA: ALV.Mn NRT.'OP EAS' AVE , /;•!9" ';':E- f _ c: cvc •Er 3Eq R:5 RSV VA. 9'D S". 'VRO DE'. 44 9 :e• Ccc Evv.cv ^ca P:: gMVA. 6ER405A 'N9:' HMO'.' - - ere•ev ISMS REVOVA:. :" ' °RC S:X'P "901 1211WK '2/29/90 2/29/90 `2/29/9^. '2/29/0." '2/29/90 '2/29/90 '2/29/9: '2/29/9". :2/291.." '2/29/90 '2/29/9: '2/29;90 '2/29/99 '2/29/9: '2/29/9: 2/29/91 '2/29/90 '2/2919: •2129!0 .2v!en •p!yo /D0 '2;2918^ '2/29 ton '2129/9: :2/29/9". 12/29/9: 3 ,sy'!A• A� 3!2s!F :a :e: ' ... - Ei1P'reyr 2.Ed� .. ^a: Y. LAE$' 1- JW'5 - � r,ry pv Pe olutim No. W—* Page 14 .. :° 7ANCRO CLCAvOYd JA 2:: CA`S i3rn92 -- - ON:Nc Oc•CoCc ARE ' S c "- :cS'4:'C": CN. OcA5E5: 40: CA'c -vo +cc •>c, )'.- J0 ?' "rC4. S: SY ANORE "YRY "C ^-c RECCR05 vANACEME9' ;!- :CS. H.,/ 4E: ^FSc -.c•cn EE-00 vAv d __ .•i:vc. SE°A!N --05E RECC4C5 +ARVEC 8` A4 N CL vCY •uc Ccc -Rnv -uc Rcc- a5S A ENO. 'RA N +A;_ SCR ----------------------------------------------- _----------------- ._ +ARN ;RTES '%' .5:'E5- ? ^R .041E4•S SE0lYk!45 E!40!Y: c.•.e_ ! -cc cvS'Ev 0E99 :S RS'AOVAL 5':MA'!" 'PRL Nll5C4 A cc SvS'EV DEWS RSMCVAL M!SC. 5'4!F5 9 ?_, °- 5'REP '0cc_?v5'EA'S OEM! ^" A4-2O c':e^ A c4vA '990 MAN'ALS D CAO:'A: 7OR0VEV54T5 °RO:cC -c n,!0'!92 '2/29/.92 r ___ ______________________ _________ ______________________ J9R -MEN' RE_CORO C'q. 'ES•RCY RE'RIEVAL EN 90X Yn_, _ —A':04 9.x :9-'99' .1 ATE ccN- •• ________________________ _________________- _____________ ^. YO' /9C '2•'29/9^ _.. 16,-U 2 '2 -490 ooe :67a� 3Jfyt - '----- ---" -"- Oates ° A4 ^rEVr 'SAC . n eb. A95, " "v A• vv" W -Acc 3A^ 1-9'-C' S 12-19 14 ;•., ¢. q cAc <dc ,: - 44C +I ^.A'.O AVO4' :E : c_ c Cin.!5, '2/20 i5c -:`:e• 4 2 5AS HE '!I ARCm! LO AVENUE 2 O :ES : "5' •2!29/59 2 cAS 595 'c - PXSALO AA'41L'E 405 2 ' :.ES :':e^ A _ :AS •ace ;'253` --AVE4 AVE %!SC. R/N '2!29/54 q c IF Y5 AVE. 94-e5 MR. ON MEANS "' / ^.' /E^ •2/29/59 c 5AS '259 " ' 'AV99 AVENUE R:SN' OP NA- :'m •/57 '2/29/5.° ':e• ¢ ^ ARC'!2k W399 ':".E 4SDORT$ ^0NEL:0 5'.- S.4.9.R. 742EROASS R/N EI'E +".... - f ARC-:9A.0 AVE. OAR 4 '0!399 04CL4 E' A' T'i¢r ARCv:9ALO AVE. +C'999 SLOPE EASE °CMO R' ty•Rv ;•!,.• /r+ •2/29/59 ::e• : '^ ARC4:SAL0 AVE. ' ^'399 v:SC. M-NM O AVE. OAR AA ARNCLO : °E EASE . !:' /5' 12/29/59 V - vgvN VA�q w3. ,' CO. d OLA' :_SS //.1 /.1 v R'2ET : idv CAFE ::_cc /;• m5 •3!29/59 2A9 .g,;. -.. a .3_.A„ ARCP:E.A_: AVE OAR 3 °T399 ANOERSOti R 2 ARC?!eALO AVE OAR 9 ROSS 6 NOLRE A 3 ARC °:SAL: AVE OAR 9.9A ROSS 5 r.C! un,3gO m•!c5 •2!29/5 °. A A ARC- :O.ALC AVE PAR 9 '01399 RO9!N9C4 :¢- s 5 44CO!9AIC AVE OAR 5 -:'399 A "A _"A NA'", C;c' "EC '2/29/E9 ooe :67a� 3Jfyt - '----- ---" -"- Oates ° A4 ^rEVr 'SAC . n eb. A95, " "v A• vv" ResolUtim No. 511-"* peqa is Ora: 5rq�'- AR' ^Y Ca;a: �ASx'. A - 7.•v C5 RAI M^. CL'CA."SA •qc '.. yc:9C . RECR 5 ARE 5!5N ANC RE'-RI '° '1E REOC97S MASENEN' :;- V!5:24. X 'E RECORDS '_!5'c^ BELOW NAY ALL BE SES+RO.•cn N x-A:V 7105 4ECCR ^.S +ARYEC 'd!'u A9 X c2A '104'45.75 -S•ROY •'::°. 9! !"C DECOR'S COORD:NA'DR: •CS'°". -::0e ._ ..S ?S :ER+ NAME: ENG. 'RAFc!r /ncS:3N *A:- ."R': D10AE: 22OE -------------------------------------- ra R! •------------------------------------------------------------------------ :A'SS DcRNANE9' RECORD "R. .-------------- 7SS'RCv RE'R!EYAL -!CX IX1 EVEN' 9OX CCN'EN'S 9ES!NY'9^ cN ^'4S 9:X NO. OCA'!DN 9ex Oe -'99' 7A'c SEN• -------------------- :`:e• 3 E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARC -:9AL2 AVE OAR + 2'399 ANOER5C1 V/OVEE `2/29158 . _ - 1 ' ARC'!99 -2 AVE OAR °. CARRAR: ^'! "' /Ee. 12/29/68 ..- - . :ARNE' -:AN S'. OAR !' 10,031 S-RvSR :'/7'/55 '2/29/58 -- e• A CA:';E' -;AY S.:A!0L'!A7!095 :' /:'!5c. '2/29 /SP c. a- . CAR4EL:AN S. OAR '2 ' "7037 ENv2ER m !7 Vey 12/29/5' CARNV.!AN S. OAR '? -O'037 011010 51L 4554. ^.!n VES 12/29/59 D'Ce- ; '2 CARNE'_:AX S'. OAR 1 407.37 SROVE :'/2'/5.5 !2/29/9.9 O':e• A 'tl CA,RNEL'.AN S7, OAR 15 10'53' CORONA C' /C! /55 12129/69 c:':e- T CAQNEL:AN S'. DAR 'S °0!93' CAL'AP!ANC 01 /C! /!! 12/29159 c:'!e- T I :AR4EL!A. S'. D4R " 10'0 ?' '-"AS :',e- A '5 CARBE' -!AN S'. OAR 1 401037 CA9L504 2!/2!/5.5. !2/29/68 e^ ; '7 a.-. ASSN'. C:S'. -59-5 1022!.5 OAR 'S A.L. !XVES'. ;,/ "'!.5! '2!29/68 :'!e• T '9 !C2255 DAR 'S 5'09ER C.E. E+ L'% 0'. /O! /5! !2/29/5! ,•.e- T •9 1022!5 DAR '7 3!EN S.E. E' AL 0' /0'155 12/29158 ..' :e• a •- °C22D5 DAD •9 N!CMCLS 7.0. 7'/2'/55. 12/29/55 !a- 4 2 1la,M OAR '96!9A 9A2!9 S. ' AL 2 1/0'!65 '2/29/!8 `.:e- A 22 -022255 DAR 22 5'RPER F.O. E' CX 77/2115 ,2/29/6!^ -:'!e- 1 23 !02295 DAR 22 rAR'!BC r c' L'X ^'/^,' /55 12/29/68 1 ^ME DAR 22 0M!RBAN V. 4, C' /7 `!SE '2129/'.: :'2e^ A 25 °0225! DAR 21 AC8!95 A.L. S' CN -: `de- A 23 1C2295 OAR 2' SRAM 9.:. !' :% ^V "!/5! °. 12,129M 2' 7+,22!5 DAR 25A `LS'OY VERA 0: /01/55 12/29/59 28 402295 OAR 25A CMSR90 ET A: 2110116S 12/29/5.9 2S 4.'4 L04A ASSN' 7!S' 0 -55-S 'CC'S S %A'S 7'/0'/55 !2/29/68 .: AL'A LONA ASST' C:5' D_ee_! °C229e. 'C7S'P OARCELR 7,/0i /!5 '2129/15 :'ce• a ? -02295 OAR ' %Z :' /:' /S! 7212915E c: ?e- = 22 ',02295 N :50 C'/2: /ES '2/29/'.6 :':e^ C 21 102255 OAR 2 BROWN, E: C!!LE4 S C ". ''/:'/S5. '2129/15 :e- A 7- -2+25E DAR 5 AL'A ;ONA J: 5AR'45RS1!O !C' /55 12/29/50 :'!e• 9 35 •^72D5 DAR ! 4:CPOLS O.O. "' /;•!SR 12!29/58 5C':e• S 5^ MC22 ?! OAR 5 R!C401S 1.0. 12129/6P 37 1022!.' OAR A C19ELLA E' AL ^'/0.'/55 12/29/58 5:' : ?• tl D! 4022!5 OAR 7 4::!'^....,D 0'/0'/99 •2!29/'5 _• tl ?9 1022.!5 DAR R 4CCDRR M.A. E• CX ""7'/!5 1212919 -02 +05 DAR 9 'O.L!10° V. . ,C'!5E '2/29/59 Ora: 5rq�'- AR' ^Y Ca;a: �ASx'. A - Resolution No. 92 - * ** Page 16 _. ✓' RANC40 C'.'CAWNSA : ! RECCRC2 IRS c�ucC:.EC E'0 : TRC'.T_Cy. D_c1Ec :Y ^.:Cp'D 7:- ...:7Y >E'!:S --._? RECCR7S 40E7 M:TD 4N ,X -OD rDyrv2, 7ccaROv -DE RE!, ,. !o» Ito• 9Alc: SRa. 'RADD:C /°E5:2N -, -A:L OR' ----------------------------- -------------------------- ---------- .,Rv "A's X. EVEN' SOX CC9'EY'2 ?E2MN, 5RO:414 1.2295 DAR '7 ONES." D.O. c.T A'_ :':e• 1 'C2295 DAR "9 "A :A:9AN0 N.° - 'ce• ' IE -022eS DAR '2 4'11* EA9 E.L F A'- 'ce• 4 ._ nn2Dg DAR I y,c +RE "A c, - -' 4- t5 102285 DAR 101A M .'.BAND N+- `:' ".er 4 "- °AS 995 15; - ARC °:AAI.O p D:.ES - .e^ 4 41 ARC°:D•A 0 AV! R CCA':CR r. -------------- •--------------------------------- .-------- 'ERfANEN' RECORD C'R. ^ESTRQ° RETR:;Vk ?OX SOX NC. :CATION Sax CC -'99^ CA'5 .. •./7'/95 '2'29/56 T /C YSS '2/29/66 ^• /T /5S 12/29/98 '3129/98 -:129/98 O'/2V99 '2/29/66 /S-Y, ______ Jere: V°• "EDARTNeq' -EA: :ace: ASS'. rnv AT Ev E::MLE rxEs ON YOL7 BOXES 9E!,!M TO SE RE "MV -OR DES'R::T::M' NXES'0 QE CSS'r"SE :, _ Vd4: : "se Wc". %s: "e RET'JR9E71 34 - - CITY OF RANCHO (TCAMONGA STAFF REPORT F DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 92• RECOMMENDATION• That the City Council approve the following amendments to Resolution No. 92 -077. BACROROUND /ANALYSIS: At its April 1 meeting, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92 -077 regarding the transfer of ownership and control of the cable television franchise agreement from DCA Cablevision- Dickinson California Arizona Associates, Ltd. to DCA Cablevision, a California General Partnership and Marks and Associates, Inc. Mr. Williams Marks, of Marks and Associates, Inc. has since requested that amendments to that resolution be added. The following are those amendments. Staff has had the language of the amendments reviewed and approved by the City Attorneys Mr. Jim Markman and Mr. Bill Curley, and by the City's cable television consultant, Mr. Carl Pilnick. At the end of Section A, subsection ii, the following should be added: "and the collateral assignment of and grant of a security interest in the franchise to one or more senior lenders, including Fleet Bank of Providence, Rhode Island (collectively, the "Lenders "), in connection with a loan agreement between such senior lenders and DCA Cablevision." And, in Section B, subsection 2, the following should be added to the first sentence: 'That the proposed transfer of ownership and control from GRANTEE to the TRANSFEREES and the collateral assignment of and grant of a security interest in the franchise to the Lenders are in the best interests of and will benefit the public. I- Respectfully Submitted, Susan Mickey Management Analyst I 3(p RESOLUTION NO. 92 -077 A A RESOLUCION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF OWNEF- SFUP AND CONTROL OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREE - MENT PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO DCA CABLLVISION- DI=SON CALIFORNIA ARIZONA ASSOCIATES, LTD. (DCAA) TO RESPEC- TIVELY DCA CABLEVISION, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PAK_'NERSFIIP AND MARKS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. A. Recitals (i) Pursuant to Title 7 - 'Cable Television Systems and Franchises] of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (sometimes hereinafter "GRANPDR"), has heretofore granted a cable television franchise agreement to the entity vnown as Dickinson California Arizona Associates (sometimes "DCAA" or "GRANTEE "). -this Council, pursuant to Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade, retains jurisdiction to regulate and approve, conditionally approve or disapprove any and all requests of GRANTEE to transfer its ownership and control of such franchise. (ii) Pursuant to Section 7.02.100 of Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code GRANTEE has submitted a request for GRANLOR's consent to transfer ownership of the franchise to a new entity known as DOA Cablevision, a California General Partnership =,Vrised of Dickinson California Arizona Associates, Ltd. and West Coast Cable Partners, L.P. and control to Marks and Associates, Inc. a general partner of West Coast Cable Partners L.P. (collec- tively "transferee's "), and the collateral assignment of and grant of a security interest in the franchise to one or more senior lenders, including Fleet Bank of Providence, Rhode Island (collectively, the Lenders "), in connection with a loan agreement between such senior lenders and DCA Cablevision. (iii) This Council has received, reviewed and considered written and oral evidence which demonstrates that its consent to the requested transfer of ownership and control will be of benefit to the public and in conformance with the requirements of Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code. (iv) All legal prerequisites to t:e adoption of this Resolution have properly occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, consent and resolve as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set. forth in th Recitals, Part A, hereinabove. 31 Resolution No. 92 -077 Page 2 =MO_N 2: That the proposed transfer of ownership and control from GRA= to the TRANSFEREES area the collateral assignment of and grant of a security interest in the franchise to the Lenders are in the best interests of and will benefit the public. The totality of the evidence presented to GRANTOR is satisfactory to demonstrate coMlian e with the standards established in Section 7.02.100 of Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, as enforced by G.RANIOR. SECTION 3: This consent to and approval of the transfer of ownership and control shall not be effective until the TRANSFEREES have become a signa- tory to the existing franchise agreement. SECTION 4: 'Ibis consent to and approval of the transfer of ownership and control is fu. -ther conditioned upon satisfaction of the following terms, representations and covenants: 1) The DCA Cablevision, a California General Partnership accepts and will coyly with all provisions of the existing DCA Cablevision franchise agreement, except those of Section 8 and Exhibit C, which have been preempted by federal law. 2) In settlenwnt of DCA's present noncompliance with Sections 5.5 and 7.2(b) of the franchise agreement, DCA Cablevision, a California General Partnership will pay or cause to be paid to the City the Sian of $67,663.00 prior to, but no later than, March 26, 1992. Simultaneously, DCA Cablevision, a California General Partnership will pay or cause to be paid to the City: (a) the sum of $34,035.26, to bring the past due franchise fees current to December 31, 1991, and (b) the estimated franchises due is $34,000.00 for the first quarter of 1992 (ending March 31, 1992). As to the payment of estimated fees; at the time of final calculation of the actual franchise fees the parties shall, upon reasonable request from either party, pronq7tly deliver to the party due the same full amount of any under or overpayment as reflected between the estimated fee paid and the actual son payable. Furthermore, DCA Cablevision, a California General Partnership agrees to pay the quarterly franchise fees or, a timely basis which will be no more than forty -five (45) days beyond March 31, .Tune 30, September 30 and December 31. It is agreed that these payments will resolve all outstanding franchise fee noncompliance issues, pending the outcome of the franchise fee audit. 3) Within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the transfer, DCA Cablevision, a California Crneral Partnership shall furnish to the City proof of coverage of the insurance required by Section 3.5 of the franchise agreement, and concurrently shall provide the security fund required by Section 3.6 of the franchise agreement. LAY' Resolution No. 92 -077 Page 3 4) The requirement of Section 7.2(b) for a PE); access capital equipment grant of one dollar ($1.00) per subscriber per year shall continue so long as the current franchise agreement remains in force. Upon written demand by the City, TRANSFEREES shall promptly deliver to City any such accrued grant furls and any re,,;-red access channel capacity, in accordance with its access cablecasting needs, as indicated by an access operating plan approved by the City Council. The City shall be responsible for operating costs under any approved plan. 5) TRANSFEREES shall pay to GRANTOR, upon request by GRAN'NR, the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Such monies shall be exclusively used by GRANTOR to assist in the payment of cable consultant fees incurred by GRANTOR as a direct result of this request to transfer a nership and control. 6) All parties agree that any accrued but unexpended funds provided under Section ?.3 (b) may be utilized, at the City's option, not only for access cablecasting equipment and facilities, but also to defer part of the cost of an interconnection system among the City's franchised cable systems so that access programs can be transmitted simultaneously to all cable subscribers in the City. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOFfED this 26th day of March, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: Wright DeNlis L. Stout, Mayor a YI ITYi.W Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLEW( of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby aertify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of March, 1992. 31 Resolution No. 92 -077 Page a E]ceCUted this 27th day of March, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk LI 0 -- CITY OF RANCHO Ct'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR FUNDING FOR A MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY STUDY The City Council approve funding for a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) study in an amount not to exceed $34,000.00 to be paid out of the County of San Bernardino's Trust Fund, Sub Object No. 020, Fund 545, The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of siting Material Recovery Facilities in the West End. The siting of Material Recovery Facilities is a part of the State mandated legislation AB 939. This component of the legislation requires municipalities to develop disposal facility capacity with the goal of 25 percent diversion by 1995 and 50 percent diversion. The total cost of this study is $95,000.00 and the costs for each participating City is based proportionally on each City's annual tonnage. As the City Council is aware, the City has been cooperatively working with our surrounding neighbor cities of Chino, Montclair, Upland, and the County of San Bernardino. This West End entity has been enlarged to also include the City of Chino Hills and Fontana. In ongoing discussions with this West End entity, the elected Mayor and Members of the City Council Material Recovery Facility • Page Two representatives for each City have been meeting on a regular basis to discuss working cooperatively and regionally to address meeting the State mandated disposal facility capacity requirements of AB 939. This entity has asked that each participating City approve this use of funds via a minute action. espectf I submitted, Diane O'Neal Management Analyst II �2 -- -- CITY OF RANCHO CI:CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer . SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY, PARTS I AND II, FOR THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2 STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT AT NORTHERN TERMINUS OF HERMOSA AVENUE PROJECT AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION THEREFORE RECOMMENDATION It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and 11 for the proposed Assessment District 84 -2 Storm Drain Replacement at Northern Terminus of Hermosa Avenue Project and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKEROUID /ANALYSIS This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Assessment District 84 -2 Storm Drain Replacement at Northern Terminus of Hermosa Avenue Project. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned improvements. Said project entails the replacement of 175.5 linear feet of 48" diameter corrugated metal pipe with an equal length of 48" diameter reinforced concrete pipe. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these Improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectfully submit // C2 z��k William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ? , a q� + A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2 STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT AT NORTHERN TERMINUS OF HERMOSA AVENUE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Assessment District 84 -2 Storm Drain Replacement at Northern Terminus of Hermosa Avenue Project; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the EnvironmeniT sl�sesment Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Assessment District 84 -2 Storm Drain Replacement at Northern Terminus of Hermosa Avenue Project. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant tom eFT�alifornia Environmental Quality Act. Li 1A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PART I - INITIAL STUDY General Information 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Cucamonga, Engineering Division. 10500 Civic Center r- iD— ve, K 2. Address of Project: Assessment District 84 -2, Storm Drain Replacement at northern terminus of Hermosa Avenue 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer, P.E., same address as above (714)- 989_18b , ex�L333 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: N/A 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Street Closure Permits; approval of project by City Council, City of Rancho Eucamonga b. Existing zoning district: N/A 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Replacement of existing 48" Corrugated Metal Pipe with 48" Rein orce r� Project Description and Effects: See Attached 8. Site Size. 9. Square footage. 10. Number of floors of construction. N/A 11. Amount of off -street parking provided. N/A 12. Attach plans. N/A 13. Proposed scheduling. 14. Associated project. N/A 15. Anticipated Incremental development. N/A IS. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices of rents, and type of household size expected. N/A 4S 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city as regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. N/A 18. if industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimate occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or reasoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. N/A Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). 4� Yes No 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, X or hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. ' 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential X areas or public lands or roads. 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of X project. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. X 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality X or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. — 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in X the vicinity. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 30 percent or more. X 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as X toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, X fire, water, sewage, etc.). — —" 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, X oil, natural gas, etc.). 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. X 4� Environmental Setting: See Attached 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning, givision. Date: !f_ d_ yy Signature: —T enry MUraKosni Title: Associate Engineer 4J Attachment - Part I Project Description and Effects: Items 8, 9, 13, 25, 26, 27, 33 E 34 The project consists of the replacement of 175.5 linear feet existing 48" Corrugated Metal Pipe with an equal length of 48" Reinforced Concrete Pipe and some miscellaneous reconstruction. The project area covers approximately 150 linear feet of public roadway. The anticipated project schedule for construction is in the 92/93 fiscal year. The project site is located at the northern terminus of Hermosa Avenue. The proposed 48" RCP can convey a greater quantity of runoff than the existing 48" CMP. The proposed improvements will not have a substantial impact on plants, animals, land resources or any obvious historical, cultural or scenic aspects. Noise, vibration, dust and odors will temporarily increase at the project site during times of construction. After completion of the project, all noise, vibration, dust and odors created by this project will cease to exist and return to pre- project levels. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST + I. BACKGROUND I. Name of Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent Engineerin 9 Division 10500 Civic Center Drive. Rancho Cucamonga. I.. M mT-- 3. Date of Checklist Submitted August 21, 1991 4. Agency Requiring Checklist _City of Rancho Cucamonga 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Assessment District 84 -2 Storm Drain Storm Drain Replacement at I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soli? X c. Change in topography or ground surface re lief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion A of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes In deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes In siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? A X 9. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ — X '1 l Page 2 50 YES MAYBE NO 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors: X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? w X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with - drawls, or through interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ _ X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result 1n: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? X 50 5 6 7. 8. 9. 10 Page 3 YES MAYBE NO b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ _ X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ _ X Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms or insects)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X Light and Glare. will the proposal produce new 7g Ff r gTare7 X Land Use. Will the proposal produce new TigTii: or glare? X Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Risk of Upset. Will the proposal Involve: a. A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? X b. Possible interference with ao emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X .5 Page 4 YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the T-0-5 on, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing oh —uSFn_9 or create a demand for additional housing? 11, Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal resu n: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation ' systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? _ X e. Alterations to water- borne, rail, or air traffic? f. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ 14. Public Services. Will the proposals have an effect upon, or res5TY in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? X X X X a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X SZ Page 5 53 YES MAYBE NO 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need Tor ew systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a. Electric power? x b. Natural or packaged gas? x c. Comiwnications systems? x d. Water supply? x e. Waste water facilities? _ x f. Flood control structures? x 9. Solid waste facilities? x 11. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ _ x b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? x 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the o s rue on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? i x 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an mpaicTpon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _ x 20. Cultural Resources. a, Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ x b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? _ x c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ x ` d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? x 53 Page 6 YES MAYBE NO 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. 0 a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time While long -term impacts will endure well into the future). X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two of more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Narrative escr p ono env ronmen impacts.) SEE ATTACHED S Ll Page 7 IV. DETERMINATION o e comp eted by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. Date 4 -9 -9� a o k. S gna ure enry ura osFii -- Associate Engineer, P.E. For: The City of Rancho Cucamonga SS Attachment - part II Discussion of Environmental Evaluation of Impacts I. Earth + b. Trenching will be required to replace the existing storm drain. However, the trench will be covered then repaved or regraded. 3. Water b. and c. The proposed 48" Reinforced Concrete Pipe can convey a greater quantity of runoff than the existing 48" Corrugated Metal Pipe. 6. Noise a. Existing noise levels will increase due to equipment operations during construction, but could be mitigated by the installation of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment. 10. Risk of Upset b. The project will entail the partial closing of Hermosa Avenue at its northern terminus. 13. Transportation /Circulation a., b., d. and f. During construction operations, traffic and parking will increase on surrounding streets near the project perimeter. Alterations to present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation and any Possibility of traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warring and detour signs. 14. Public Services a., b., and c. This project will have an interim effect on the present pattern of circulation of vehicles (i.e., police, fire, school). Such circulation pattern impacts can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date and duration of said work. 51 1,11 I Ur- NAINUMU k UGANWINUA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SUMdARILY VACATE A PORTION OF 8817 STRANG LANE, LOCATED EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, AND RELEASE OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT REQUESTED BY GARY AND JANINE THOMPSON RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions summarily ordering the vacation of a portion of 8817 Strang Lane, east of Carnelian Street north of Hillside Road, as described in Exhibit "A" and releasing the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to record same. On May 2, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90 -186 designating Strang Lane as a private street and exempting the abutting properties from the requirement to dedicate public street right -of -way. On January 28, 1992, the property owners of 8817 Strang Lane, Gary and Janine Thompson, submitted an application for vacation of an existing irrevocable offer of street dedication fronting their property. With the designation of Strang Lane as a private street under Ordinance 58 -C, offers of street dedication can be vacated and as a result of this, the applicants are now requesting that the vacation occur. The vacation of the remaining offers of dedication along the street will be processed in the future when requested by the adjacent property owners. The subject irrevocable offer of street dedication is 30 feet wide and 150 feet long and is located on the south side of Strang Lane, east of Carnelian Street as described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B ". On March 11, 1992, the Planning Commission determined that said vacation would conform to the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur. A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by the City Council on March 7, 1984 and recorded on March 27, 1984 as Document No. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 8817 STRANG LANE April 15, 1992 Page 2 • 84- 670438 in the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. The said Lien Agreement was for the future construction of missing off -site street improvements fronting 8817 Strang Lane and is no longer needed due to the designation of Strang Lane as a private street. Also, the said agreement was originally signed by Alexander and Joyce Frazin and was later automatically transferred to the present owners. Respectfully submi�tE�, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WY:dlw Attachments S9_1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 8817 STRANG LANE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Street and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, City Council found all the evidence submitted that said Irrevocable offer of street dedication fronting 8817 Strang Lane is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes because it has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated for five consecutive years preceding the proposed vacation. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by tM#7CI- y Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: p. SECTION 1: That the City Council of City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ma es s order vacating that portioo.4 et on Map V -121, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said port i aTM7 Strang Lane no longer constitutes a street easement. SECTION 3: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations ana exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution —to -e recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, 59 RESOLUTION NO. G") - 1 t) b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM GARY AND JANINE THOMPSON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 84 -25 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Alexander and Joyce Frazin; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on March 27, 1484, as Document No. 84- 670438; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. (00 EXHIBIT 'A' The North 30 feet of all that certain real property located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: The Easterly 150 feet of the Westerly 830 feet of the South 1/2 of all that portion of Lot 4, Block 13, Cucamonga Homestead Association Lands, as per map recorded in Book 6, Page 46 of Maps, Records of said County lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel to the Northerly line of said Lot, the Northwesterly corner of said parcel being at a point equidistant from the Northwest corner and the southwest corner of said Lot. N.�qp n\ M1d ti P.2 OW 1 WK i Pa 1 P, 12 �on PaeJ MIS HlSI A_79y ^� hr2 UU O j W �O 1 ® J / 1 /16 i jy9 /91. vv i FM p"'69/6'. M (`v 1 STRANG ra, .1 y\ ?. Pn2 eN T H99S 4'13 '7 841 4A53 /i. =(JO AREA TO 136 VACATED G\ 50lv/SOl N a8„ CITY OF rI'Ot V—lzf STRhNGLF{NE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SiTE itf 4� ENGINEERING DIVISION RXHMIP CITY OR ITEM, S �PJMC LANE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION 43 TITLE: *01C/AUTY MAP E=BIT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP AND ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 13693, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTHRIDGE DRIVE, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY STEVEN R. LUNA. RECOI ENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 13693 and accepting the subject Real Property Improvement contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the mayor to sign said agrement and the City Clerk to cause said map and agreement to record. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Parcel Map 13693 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 7, 1991, for the division of 1.0 acre of land into 2 parcels in the very low Residential Development District, located on the north side of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue. The Developer, Steven R. Luna, is submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of street improvements within the irrevocable offer of dedication provided at the northeast corner of Parcel 2. The said irrevocable offer of dedication being provided is consistent with master planning alternate "I" (see attached Exhibit "I ") which lnvolve3 the future extension of Cartilla Avenue due south of Wilson Avenue. Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Respectfully submittal, f Zed William J. O'NeW City Engineer WJO:WV:jh Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 9a- /0/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 13693 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 13693, submitted by Steven R. Luna, Subdivider, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission on May 22, 1991, as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 13693 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the Final Map approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 13693 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. (05 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEVEN R. LUNA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, future construction of street improvements within the irrevocable offer of dedication at the northeast corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 13693 has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Steven R. Luna. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. lP / 0 .j � P I VA VkK e b O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION �, -7 N.T.S. N rrEM: PARCEL MAP 131,93 TITLE: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: A f i S\� O s © pp 00 ©00 �pll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION �, -7 N.T.S. N rrEM: PARCEL MAP 131,93 TITLE: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: A f l.tfENO: ® E.a L.y Pn./ Nnn4r Avmrae _- - - -'- - r ' I I :e 1 fIfI V — L_ I I I I 3 1 � I Q I I ` vacn.w Pccm r Z 3 I ✓�, )IKrrt 2 I Na,Ihridgv CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIMON 1 �J �.K N }may; PARLEI. MAP, 1 3693 nTLgMASTER PLAN ALT. 2 EXHIBIT. «, Z �� CITYOF RANCHO 0'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT r DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Tarry L. Smith, Community and Park Development Superintendent BY: David B. Station, Assistant Park Planner SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 26 -3900- 9109 /REVENUE AND ACCOUNT NUMBER 26- 4532- 8768 /EXPENDITURE FOR THE 1989/1990 ROBERTI- Z'BERG- HARRIS GRANT TO AUGMENT EXISTING FUNDS APPROPRIATED FOR BASKETBALL HARDCOURT CONSTRUCTION. AND APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT THE BASKETBALL HARDCOURT RETROFIT PROJECT, WHICH INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION OF BASKETBALL COURTS AT CHURCH STREET AND WINDROWS PARKS, WITH TERRA -CAL CONSTRUCTION, OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 31- 4532 -8810 AND 26 -4532- 8768, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the appropriation of Account Number 26- 3900-9109 /REVENLJE and Account Number 26- 4532- 8768 /EXPENDITURE for the 1989/1990 Roberti- Z'Berg -Harris Grant, in the amount of $34,470 to augment the existing grant funds of $40,000 appropriated for basketball hardcourt construction, It is further recommended that the City Council declare the lowest bidder, Terra -Cal Construction, Incorporated, of Baldwin Park, California, responsive; award Terra -Cal the contract agreement for the Basketball Hardcourt Retro -fit Project; authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract document; and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $48,506.70 (base bid for Church Street Park $23,385.50, alternate #1 for Windrows Park $20,711.50, plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account Numbers 31- 4532 -8810 and 26- 4532 -8768, On March 18, 1992, the City Council approved the transfer of funds from 1989/1990 Roberti- Z'Berg -Hams Grant in the amount of $34,470 to the Basketball Hardcourt Retro -fit Project. CIT Y COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS, APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE AGREEMENT FOR BASKETBALL HARDCOURT RETRO -FIT PROJECT April 15, 1992 Page 2 Appropriation of these funds will augment the existing funds of $40,000 available in Account Number 31- 4532 -8810. Therefore, the total expenditure of $48,506.70 for construction will be funded from Account Numbers 31- 4532 -8810 and 26 -4532 -8768. On March 26, 1992, bids were received for the Basketball Hardcourt Retro-fit Project to include Church Street Park (base bid), Windrows Park (alternate #1), and Hermosa Park ('alternate N2). The Park and Recreation Commission recommends excluding Hermosa Park alternate N2, from the project at this time. Therefore, it is recommended by staff that the base bid and alternate Nl be awarded to Te ra -Cal Construction, the apparent responsive low bidder, for the construction of basketball courts at Church Street Park and Windrows Park. The remaining Roberti- Z'Berg- Harris funds are recommended by Park and Recreation Commission to be expended on additional picnic site amenities in existing parks at a future date. A summary of the bids received is provided in Exhibit "A ". Respectfully submitted, Tarry L. Smith Community and Park Development Superintendent TLS:DBS:dk Attachment �0 Exhibit "A" BID OPENING Basketball Hardcourt Retro -fit Project March 26, 1992 CONTRACTOR BASE BID ALT "1 ALT #2 TOTAL Terra-Cal Construction 23,385.50 1 20,711.50 19,667.50 63,764.50 Inland Asphalt 25,607.50 25,124.00 23,425.00 74,156.50 HP Construction 26,259.20 24,560.20 25,850.20 76,669.60 Los Angeles Eng. Inc, 34,250.00 30,587.50 32,767.50 97,605.00 Artistic Landscape 36 „106.00 28,215.50 I 26,542.50 90,864.00 JDC 36,751.00 36,871,50 35,252.50 108,875.00 BoPark Enterprises 40,859.75 39,820.75 41,455.00 122,135.50 Hondo Company 42,240.00 39,641.50 37,502.50 119,384.00 -3I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR SWIMMING POOL OPERATION AT ALTA LOMA NIGH SCHOOL - SUMMER 1992 Signing of attached contract. BACKGROUND Annually the City conducts lessons and recreational swim programs at the Alta Loma pools. Each year the programs are highly successful and well received by the public. Community Services conducts these programs through rental of the pool facilities and pass on the rental costs to the participants. The program is totally self supporting. The attached agreement finalizes the City's annual request. Respectfully submitted, Joe h tz, CLP Comm ity S, iccts1 Director JS /KS /kls Attachment AGREEMENT FOR SWIMMING POOL OPERATION THIS AGREEMENT entered into on the 25th day of March I 19 92 , between the City of aanrhn 01ramonga_, California, herein- after referred to as the City and the CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT of San Bernardino County, hereinafter referred to as the District: W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City desires to establish recreational swim- ming programs at the Alta Toma High School and: WHEREAS, the District deems it desirable to cooperate in the establishment of such programs under the conditions herein- after set forth, now, therefore, it is agreed as follows: 1. The District shall furnish during the term of this Agreement the following: a. The Aita lcma High School swimming pool, including adjacent restrcoms, and a ticket booth/ office area. b. Normal equipment necessary to operate the pool. 2. The term of this Agreement shall be from 'Tune 21, 1992 to Aucfust 29, 1992 3. The rental rate shall be at $ 1284.00 per week or pro- rated for any portion of the last week of the rental term. The City agrees to remit the total amount due at the end of the summer program. The City shall not be charged for full -day closures when such closures are caused by equipment malfunction. Partial day closures shall not be credited. 4. The District shall provide for the normal maintenance of the pool, including utilities. $13 o. Application for the specific dates and hours of use by the City shall be submitted to the District and approved by the Director, Business Services. 6. The City shall be responsible for organizing and super- vising recreational swimming programs, and for the employment and scheduling of personnel to operate such programs. The City may establish charges for the above swimming programs and funds received shall become the property of the City. 8. The City agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the School District, its successors and assigns, from and against all claims, liens, encumbrances, actions, loss, damages, causes of action, expense and /or liabil- ity, including court costs and attorney's fees arising from or resulting from loss or damage to property or injury to or death of persons resulting in any manner whatsoever directly or indirectly, by reason of their program operation of the Alta 1. High School swimming pool during tie times that the same is open for use or being used under the supervision of the City. The District agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the City, its successors and assigns, from and against all claims, liens, encumbrances, actions, loss, damages, causes of action, expense and /or liability, including court costs and attorney's fees arising from or resulting from loss or damage to property or injury to or death of persons resulting in any manner whatso- ever directly or indirectly, by reason of their main- tenance of the Alta Low High School swimming pool. 10. School property shall be protected from damage or mis- treatment. In the event that facilities or equipment are damaged as a result of carelessness in its use or mistreatment by the City, the necessary costs of repair or replacement shall be paid by the City. 11. The City will provide the District a certificate of insurance naming the Chaffey Joint union High School District as an additional insured on the City's liabil- ity insurance policy. 12. This agreement may be amended or cancelled at any time by mutual agreement of both parties. I I q CITY OF RANCHO CHCA.MONGA Authorized Signature Attest/City Clerk Date �J 2 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT /--6. /-� Authorized Signature SUSAN B. SUNDELL Director, Business Services Date -- ---- - -- — CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA ;r.. STAFF REPORT" DATE: April 9, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJEar: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT MOBILE HOME ACCORD FOR THE PINES MOBILE HOME PARK The City Attorney's office has been working with the attorneys for the Pines' owners subsequent to the Supreme Court decision handed down regarding Yee vs The City of Escondido. Today, April 9, 1992, the owners of the Pines Mobile Home Park advised the City Attorney's office they will sign the Accord. The actual Accord contract for the Pines will be a separate document from the other seven park owners, but the provisions of the Accord will be the same as those provided in the Accord signed March 4, 1992 by the City Council and seven other park owners. This Accord documentation is being prepared by the City Attorney's office today and will be forwarded to the Pines' owners for their signature. This Accord will be presented to the City Council at the April 15, 1992 meeting. 'is pectfu u itted, Diane O'Neal Management Analyst II CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE April 15, 1992 1Li. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment to Contract for Tax Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council execute an amendment to contract #91- 053 with NBS/Lowry to provide tax and financial consulting in relation to CFD 88 -2. The amount of the amendment shall not exceed $6,000 and shall be paid from account 75- 4130 -6028. Background: In order to insure that the proposed bond sale in CFD 88 -2 is done efficiently with as little impact on the property owners in the District, it is necessary to analyze the tax burden and debt service schedules for the bond issue. Because of the complexity of this deal and the length of time it has taken to complete, the original amount budgeted for this consultant has been exhausted. Additionai funds are required to complete the tax analysis for this district prior to the sale of bonds and prior to establishing the levy for next year. The proposed amendment is based on time and material spent on the project with a cap of $6,000. The funds for this contract will come from the assessments already received from this District and will not impact the General Fund. Respectfully Submitted, CI'F`' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR PARCEL MAP 12263 LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND KENYON WAY SUBMITTED BY HUGHES /LYON /MILLIKEN ASSOCIATES RECOMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City clerk to sign said agreement. Parcel Map 12263, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue, was approved by City Council on August 1, 1990, for the division of 13.41 acres into 11 commercial parcels. The Developer, Hughes /Lyon/Milliken Associates 1s submitting an additional agreement and security for construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Kenyon Way. This agreement 1s the standard improvement agreement for public improvements. The Developer will be processing, in the near future, an agreement which will govern the reimbursement of the cost of the traffic signal. The traffic signal is not warranted at this time nor was it conditioned as part of the development, however, the developer still desires to construct the signal for the safety of the customers shopping within the commercial center. The Developer, Hughes /Lyon /Milliken Associates, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the traffic signal In the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $132,000.00 Labor & Material Bond: 66,000.00 Copies of the Agreement and Security are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitt William J, O'Neil i City Engineer WJO:JS:jh Attachment RESOLUTION NO. Q�- />)� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR PARCEL MAP 12263 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement submitted by Hughes /Lyon /Milliken Associates as developer, for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Kenyon Way; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. -�n �r�ws N Wass OF rj'j�TRR.�FjC Sr4i7Ac /rl /[r/kEU t KEALO, ANCHO CUCAMON" 7T!'ii VICINITY MAP 90 Uii x Ur rtruv�nv UU�A.nUiNWI STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 Im TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY RECOMIENDATI0N It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving street and storm drain improvements for Lark Drive in conjunction with the Rancho Cucamonga High School, accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. MALYSIS/BACKGROUND Rancho Cucamonga High School, located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Highland Avenue lies within the Victoria Planned Community. Prior to occupancy of the high school, the public improvements adjacent to the school site are required to be constructed. The Developer, The William Lyon Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $313,000 Labor and Material Bond: $156,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil ,J City Engineer WJO:SM:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. l a - %0 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by The William Lyon Company as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. 0;Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING MOON PROPOSED DIPROVEMEN7S rrEX- VICINITY "Ap TrrLL- RANc-L-!o cucAmo,;(-,,A LARK DRiVL- EXMrr: V". Lu :7 7 z w > is W w I.. kk ;qc. 0 VICTORIA PARK LANE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING MOON PROPOSED DIPROVEMEN7S rrEX- VICINITY "Ap TrrLL- RANc-L-!o cucAmo,;(-,,A LARK DRiVL- EXMrr: V". -- - - - - -- CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT " .a -Y DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13440, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY J.P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT RFrJftW BATtt1Y It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13440 were approved by the City Council on April 6, 1989, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $379,000 Labor and Material Bond: $189,000 The developer, J.P. Rhoades, is requesting approval of a 3 -month extension on said improvement agreement in order to cap pave the street, complete the sidewalk, and plant the remaining street trees. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available to the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully subml d, William J. O'Neil / City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments J. P RHOADES DEVELORMENT 1801-C Parkcoun Place Santa Ana CA 92701.5080 P.O. Box 1973, Santa A a CA 92702.1973 (714) 9729941 FAX (714) 9730885 Henne oh T France P,],t'danger COnSVlt.t March 12, 1992 Mr. Steve Gilliland CITY OF RANCHO CUMAMONGA Engineering 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Improvements Agreement - Tract 13440 Dear Mr. Gilliland: IC` Our Improvements Agreement for Tract 13440 is due to expire on April 5, 1992. As you are aware the development community and city and county governments are still feeling the effects of the current prolonged recession. Sales activity has been at record low levels for the past year. We have however, been able to make continued progress towards selling out our Highland Vineyards tracts. In Tract 13440 we currently have 27 out of 111 homes left to sell. Sixteen of these homes are in escrow, and eleven of the buyers that are currently in escrow have contingent sales that must take place before they can close. After completion of the latest phase of construction, we will have three lots to build and four existing models. We will however be using the models and parking lot for our sales of 46 lots in Tract 14121. The tract and improvements are over 859 complete at this time with the bonds in place to complete the work. The remaining improvements of the final lift of asphalt paving, raising the manholes to grade, and the last 159 of sidewalks and street trees will be able to be completed after the final construction of the latest phase. It has been our experience that cities do not want the final improvements completed until after the sale of the last homes. We therefore, respectfully request an extension of the Improvements Agreement for Tract 13440. g5- Page 2 of 2 I have enclosed 3 notarized copies of the Extension Agreement as well as a check in the amount of $251.00. We appreciate your consideration in this request. Sincerely, J. P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT Kenneth T. ance Project Manager /Consultant KTF /mgn Encl. ';�f RESOLUTION NO. 9a• /05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13440 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 15, 1992, by J.P. Rhoades Development as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13440; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. g DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CI:CAJiONGA STAFF REPORT April 15, 1992 Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector .r • APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13566 -1 AND -3, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE BETWEEN WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND SAN SEVAINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY THE CARYN CO. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13566 -1 and -3 were approved by the City Council on October 5, 1989, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 52,791,000. Labor and Material Bond: 21,395,000. The developer, The Caryn Co., is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the remaining street improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submit d, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:ly Attachments The Dryn Development Company 34 Executive Park, Suite 155, Irv,ne. Caliromia 92714 February 20Offlje (3J)863-9001 FAX (714; 863 -0199 Mr. Joe O'Neil CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tractl 3566 - 1 & 3 Improvement Agreement Lower Wardman - Bullock Road, a.k.a. Lower Loop Road Dear Joe: Pursuant to our discussions, please issue an extension to the Improvement Agreement for the Crossing of the San Sevaine Basins at Wardman - Bullock Road. The request is based on our need to finalize with the City if the Crossing is a reasonable requirement for the traffic generated from Tract 13566. As you know, the recent DKS traffic study, with analysis based upon the eventual relocation of the I15 /Cherry Avenue Interchange, does not substantiate a need for this Crossing, especially not for Tract 13566 alone. Caryn would like to reach resolution with the City on the need for the Crossing as soon as possible, but until that time, would request that the Crossing Improvement Agreement be extended for at least a two year time period. This extension is based on the fact that, if required, we shall have to finalize our improvement drawings which require approval from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District as well as from your Department. This Flood Control approval shall not be provided by the San Sevaine / Etiwanda Project Manager until a Master Plan of Drainage is completed by the District, which is not anticipated in the near future. Once these approvals are obtained, then the actual construction would be required, which shall take an extended period of time due to our recent experiences. The deferment of the drainage and system development fees would also be extended with this improvement agreement extension. Please contact us as to when this extension can be granted as we are anxious to have the agreement extended prior to the April 15, 1992 deadline. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kevin Pohlson Vice President : \tr66imp i� G RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566 -1 AND -3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 15, 1992, by The Caryn Co., as developer, for the Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Summit Avenue between Wardman Bullock Road and San Sevaine Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13566 -1 and -3; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. I� - - - -- CITY OF RANCHO CL:CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 {t..$i TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council �C Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 11030, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RECOMEIDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 11030 were approved by the City Council on March 2, 1989, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bonds: $2,597,759 Labor and Material Bonds: $1,298,880 The developer, Lewis Development Company, is requesting approval of a 3 -month extension on said improvement agreement, in order to complete the remaining punch list items. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submit to, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1155 North Marcum Am / P.O. Box 6701 Upl=4 CJifo 91785 -0670 714,985.0971 FAX: 7141949.6700 March 10, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector Ref.: PM 11030 - Extension of Improvement Agreement Dear Steve: Enclosed please find the Improvement Agreement Extension form, executed in triplicate, as well as our check in the amount of $251.00, to extend PM 11030 for 3 months. This extension request is the result of your recent inspection of PM 11030 and the subsequent punch list generated as a result of that inspection. Thank you for your consideration of our request. very truly yours, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. i Don Thompson �! Terra Vista Project Manager DMT:ksk Enclosures 9 Z RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 0UNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11030 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 15, 1992, by Lewis Development Company as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 11030; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. `f3 CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I w SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAP 11410, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND ARROW HIGHWAY RECOMENDATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Map 11410 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $25,200, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $252,000. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Parcel Map 11410 - located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Highway DEVELOPER: Utica -Haven Associates 8599 Haven Avenue, Suite 204 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 25,200 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $252,000 Respectfully submitted, , r e2� William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment Ci RESOLUTION NO. (� (00 + A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11410 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 11410 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. lS -- -- - -- — CITY OF RANCHO CITCAMONGA s STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13275, W LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE 1200' EAST HAVEN AVENUE It is recommended that :he City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: Oxford Development 3800 W. Alameda Avenue, Suite 800 Burbank, CA 91505 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $5,200.00 Respectfully submiltted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd - -- — CITY OF RANCHO CUC'AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF MASTER PLANNED STORM DRA 4 -N, 4 -P AND 4 -0 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ASSESSMENT I 86 -2, CONTRACT NO 87 -41, LOCATED AT HAVEN AVE6,.� .. NINETEENTH STREET AS COMPLETE, RELEASE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" RECMWMDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Construction of Master Planned Storm Drain Nos. 4 -N, 4 -P and 4 -0 Improvement Project Assessment District 86 -2, Contract No. 87 -41, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Respectfully submi William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:sd cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION NO. 9d - I, o 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN NOS. 4 -N, 4 -P AND 4 -0 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Construction of Master Planned Storm Drain Nos. 4 -N, 4 -P and 4 -0 Assessment District 86 -2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT DATE: ,April 15, 1592 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: 'William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE MONTE VISTA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT 40. 91 -006, LOCATED EAST OF EAST'WOOD AVENUE AS COMPLETE, RELEASE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE .A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Monte Vista Improvement Project, Contract No. 91 -006, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $32,851.60 to be used as the Maintenance Bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $16,425.80 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $4,288.85 35 days after approval of the final contract amount of $42,888.48. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The subject project ha ,_ been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. .he final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $42,888.4E which includes one Contract Change Order for additional excavation. Respectfully submi'fte William J. O'Nei� City Engineer W.i O: LRB: sd cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION NO. A P.ESOiUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG,A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MONTE VISTA STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Monte Vista Street Improvement Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. loo ORDINANCE NO. 493 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA., CALIFORNIA., APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01, THE E'PIWANDA NOM SPECIFIC PLAN A. Recitals. (i) On June 26, and continued to July 24, August 14, September 11, October 9, November 13, December 11, and December 17, 1991, and January 8, January 22, and February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings concerning the reconmsnded adoption of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, hereinafter referred to as the "Plan." (ii) On April 1., 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the adoption of the plan. (iii) the Plan comprises approximately 6,850 acres located generally north of Wilson Avenue (with a portion north of Highland Avenue), south of the National Forest (with portions within the National Forest) , east of the extension of Milliken Avenue, and west of the City limit of the City of Fontana, all as referenced in the Land Use Map, Exhibit 17, of the Plan. (iv) On file in the City Clerk's office, and incorporated herein by this reference, is a full, true, and correct copy of the Plan. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. 2. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Final Environmental Fact Report for the Plan and General Plan 90 -03B and certified the Report, including adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the cuidelines promulgated thereunder. 3. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has adopted General Plan Amenth nt No. 90 -03B. 4. This Council hereby finals that the Plan has been drafted to include, in text and accompanying diagrams, all of the information as follows: a. The di.stridxntion, location, and extent of the lard arses, including open space, within the area covered by the Plan; and IOI Ordinance, No. 493 Page 2 b. The proposed distribution, location, extent, and intensity Of major oonponents of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential infrastructure proposed to be located within the area of the Plan and needed to support the lard uses described in the Plan; and c. dihe standards and criteria by Which development will proceed for lard uses within the Plan and standards for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources, where applicable, within the area of the Plan; and d. A description of the inrlementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out those provisions referenced in subparagraphs a, b, and c above within the area of the Plan. 5. This Council hereby adopts Specific Plan 90 -ol, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, on file in the City Clerk's office and incorporated herein by this reference, subject to each and every environmental mitigation measure set forth, inn full, in the "Etiwarda North Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. 'lhe Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None ABSINP: Wright ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Lot Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Ordinance No. 493 Page 3 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CIERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 1st day of April, 1992, and was finally passed at a regular. meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 1,5th day of April, 1992. Executed this 16th day of April, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk ()3 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN 90.01) MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Ramschmpsin Smb Laws mnudby State Mambly BIB3190( AB3180.199 9) w" Gavesmtddind &dmdprxesdstgtequwensnuforthe Cdifmia Envmmznud QuaBty An (CYQA). AB 3190 tequwes W cims wd mmtia maw* the hnplmmaAm of [BQA oEtipdoa mm .m spcified m Miussrcd Neptive ❑ecbuuiom m Fnvuomenol impat Rq ms, by mom of • lepminj wmodbtiaj' psopom pmendd sipufi t aapeas and thew miupdmo are a pw of the mitiprd orasmea for tha sabjm pojai Tbm smtipvim m inaspotned into the poject and d= iopinomtion mmutomd The M bgp Mmismiey Ropam is to be used b a bd b miv sk psopma of eae6 irdividod mitiptbn meanie. ThepsymnudcsipmdbbeBOible. Asmmimia9pupe chanV=wcmWfunxtwacoQaea may henmsmy based opmsam®aWdms bydw mspmsible for the popam As cha W sm made, t tmmbtm/ cwmph ce pme[dmm and saysda will be I ape I and iawpwded imn dse psopam L W (e A b A W USER NOTES • MPI7GATION: Pescha dptimmeavue rdendfxdio tlwPnvuorunerallrryact Repas4"Invemory oFMitigaum Measaa ^will require cartspliuue rtvin • DNPLFMUMR: The entry segaird in inglmeni the mitpdm meson; for earrgle. the poject aPPl,,&x or spplicanm • RESPONSMLR FOR MONMILDIG: The to* in ttesrapeadble for ssmisrmM for exaopsev Planing Division. Papaeawl; Division, County of Sao Bernardino Food Control Depnnom6 Cal W" Department of Fish and Owe. nod Pbuutog Caamisalan. (in this rnrnpic two tnporsalb1c ayencirs, two City dtpattmenss, would need an alp off on do mcasue and the BW aabwiy would be with the nsroisg Cmnunim.> • TIMING: the timing of mmplirx, for example. prior m project approval. each projem prior m issuance of buiiding peonu; pa m ismaocc of bane pemuu; or abet uqw m the annual project n:riaw pinatas. • COMPLIANCK: The recadof mwgBaoce, iaciwding '•SiprtueWADre "vuspecifiedio theOty'sCBQApiddim. Eumple:deparuoenWsuffassiped to the projw would sip for Plaoneg. Esgioesring rod Building and Slay, and either die Sectetry or Clair of the Planning CDou iarion would up for that PlaminSCommommoo. Inaddinuo evidetcealrousVrmcsbW boalseiedmemb Poppspit& hLdWam Mudowg Plopwudsawutheccoviumax record Such cvideta shall mNaamtie Cuv'aCBDA oddd'on adinav indude tan aa6rnaieereiaad n addttiand der¢ ermgwieamnrd awh.naaa. Sins a paopwPJR bn been pnpaed for the Unmade Nwtb Spedflc Pbr.sa eevunomeoW assessment Na11 becompkedforeari pojxt application eectivd for the Specific flan sent Am" of de Midpdm Maainring PmV= sWi be rrcW meach 1 act Wlicati" W each projmt will be mmimad few mupliaaca prior n, and subaega to n, pop= apporY according to the schedule of —hating" Pirully,shoddatmdmew ndeM tipdmModtain gPsopwbenvowry.wendmme shall bepaocaaedinamumermu 'emn with de City's CBQA Gddelixa Due of F.1R Coatiostim Date of Approval. P.dwa da North Spaific Plan z° �y m ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE. FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING _ SIGNATURE. DATE INVLVMY OF WMGATION MEASMS W W WApbdiavwnnalwkypnkm- i�vai cmdkwa mw� dbe vw., �,.Jln ontlemnimlma. atl almmwb"i —Wp mi."=Toeice1dlbpaasioll- [YICC ]/tfbbYLO1.I C..9011t11ewYaleV 1(1b A011IM'J1Y wpraa.k w�, annmee. PmvNtl bcl9w k � lb d W alkiladwl meaawe UISWSd v SaIIAI A. N Ne td1YbY b Ile dot R IIRd ptboY Vanes gpum3lc fa ibldcswadm b aw^Ib^nR °AW � u.npwec. AkMlwbR amm as IieW by bpkY aaa. I Thee m,.pg�pinahaY mwain aemmn V iRcb Pmjoa Appl a aAd Pab bappnald At9 pakcWly=,lase lepYleea b de papmd MOMW OPM apse Cky b pepee RMP tnn mq ddbwft rew(ie.SanSnails fleet. Fswltla CMeL Day Cmm. MW Ye a adde"Watla Sn Btlnalb90 NwbW fvm) kaw ev�AYb devclnpeAL aifle flan vrtlWaa aaUbe wlawi9l an39la (Pl/Sry MNSP) 2A Oeealled pbavV ka o plumV wYwY ftl =tolep i Pmjea Appkr Cm Jsllm Plba b Pmou Appmel, dMI1Yd, pa &wn,wwAabeeaublklwenddeed9l�m �pm" ulyay a0 f9ldeliem M91 nerve b airla pacaiY Iam sae 20 The FSwetlallonhSpmfk PYnahaYYepmlmadapoWindde Cky nwAkV, nwmmg Cm lI bwpolaleE km ENSP. CpaarbYy Detlot F]mma of the Ckf of Itmft Cw ma p "L e MY Claeni Sc¢ 1991 C.e9vw Plw I Oad msvkd . w e asah-g� =11=11 be Ie4W be Pmjco Apple+ Kwabv Pb mk Commit pabe b Pmku Apprn'Y. idendfled amass, mdm rue ftbl 'iq be p¢m. la *l CadbrtYDaPdpM evi po fen . . byftCmv%CUtpu7Wpea 39a ofADnlal FmSmab WG ,AmyCnpd MAN r Oe �SnaYe Waft � dedka:y awe r Peearm FaVleeaa epeapa dw--AtrawbdkYebbe cwnydSn Yellwldklo mm p tm a oaea x m esmv+ m de dad. Cwwnradm emm> be n.1aa fa de pil=e Ak W Fan $c Mab" new. bcbdwV bw Id Yanked W. be of D" C1at Wok WatdFnraoda Ceet Wab.atlmMdbcmnbnnbaad1d11e wp9d1aed5an [LCamlwlafwtkinp.v ,l]dNCtoY.rwcY Snaua Web atl SPaalinl Gmwvl. YMwwtla Cad W W ab - ,d Clwltls. aid Wy ['rth Rc wlWS Cmwda. PMwatla N1mh MlMlmx MaU fig Pmlccnl - Papc I Z b O L T � m c 0 z ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSBLE FOR .LIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE a FuN rmmrNmtr, kmlodkq le mt kmprd b, IVe(erahvr Pm)m Apptlun nr.dq, nr.dq Codeb- Prim m Appwar" tgmen dd.., ItM eadunje vun be NriotW Potts rtm w don 7r.d Mp kaotrbw A mF" fof 1AC pnpm ,l mwirumof mrtivY.tleneands. tppwr d@5P Rd/m fm Oise. r Nw (Jt J for p sdo t `IW priontYml..drbte prtsrved wkid1art inpnrKimivrrpa A mcdudrn fw mpin6ovarW rA.tl fz.peadte mr�Y.liRt . TIm meWdrmowpma la Pnefbr. p1m lkfim 111e fRl IM m!p wiINIICY b pplOVr ablf $pL {i{e PVI, 5 vicwrtcd. ft SA 3WIlidrd A... dnlpsissx! dcldat City nMq, Pndireeklk, nose kttappred Ytb FlISP, W.Y. My Clod llaalnW, Rd Fip Avd stall be proleckd. Day tiq Cpmmldm rtl Oty S.0mtiv 1991 CRellb ssd Wll"Av sliallttc a kwdn.apedr CorcB InWCYW. I6 n�ednreq trtl lrtlxReplr�pfeP•red fofthepo)enbBwen nrtrq, PnpnRaft and Hkebgpwdd II ft NbelMec. cmcn.. � vdud. a Ue City a Redo Sr101g.W S.fery, p - pals, IW4Ka pc tYcamm6.. inc)udim6 d WU,W derelopnen ndkRttR. Plsm ewh gmlea I tfeme.wre RG rlEN in Se 41, Tuft rd Clmdiflm (Sec Sttrm al.k) NYl be ImpinnmW. d. Jlte{.o4o.rdp�o}R dWl povldeJ aaesdpMludpwdw.rd Pto)eq Applly. n"*i Pl stlsWCbr i9- Rbrb Apptn.LAn pwwm m m"m NNpoOrydtlr Qty`s c.".d ne M de dm so sold 1Jsssist sewitsts - po)m wd x r mtmup nh tl vmtlgy. Pn! a Rmadrt C -, lmd IBU.ig rpptnr or Emw 9. Ned t/. aftsisty naJ<q AWIIM di&fte F. wftoiNn 20=0isp do'rJOp�e +al5 lh.n mAODgeeloa fm q�q�Cl�IY Fdw b APPUML eKh 1oa dal fmubt, b nirne u -.me M•o01n rr tM dM CeseLLJ t PWk DM po)m t e9oerde ku.rdkr lrftltla Yl.omaylK wits de blr.eme DlAdmardP.tkareoe- Phrktt pe rim (b®Wm 10 l popoad Pmjdx rtrl h R and b mtmne tlr •gVgm Ck, Pimlb Comdrbn rd Oy kepponbd ke msp. Rrmmn_RUidb.ir us ri0 m�rn.lurtdr me fp dtu reS Cbb.lcd Sepmpef 1991 dertbR. inlnaNtNrt amlyc. u1urA i�wlWn ttrA ne will rc- main iu.AanfRd F wsmwl. Notb Mel,i h4to k tq Rope - P*, 2 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN_- MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM_ YCOMPLIANCE MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLEFOR TIMING MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE .1 I.A aYAFIIY AB emsa+ aomed asdaimee ngdrzC by tte CBY d Rmedm Pioka Appikra lAa'nry, BaWiep aW n ApporJ. Cucamam�BJnn{COdeOI deeillRridelkKkpamemQdorma sakry SaRPmj= eadePnr ka aleHi be oEcrrad. Thee IKllae. M K ooi BaNeO aA Ytrlm dntlmR Lw. rm'mP✓ib'R. a! �idmrMlq d CaaA ma dtyaalaib Th4oAYommsalaoenmivappaanpdanaROcdq ><YY frIRCfRm�de rtlll �. Paalmr dsrcbpaa alrB aurfa YamA[ gtaoam n iEU maera. "ft dopKepupewvrJWlE CmrsaavMftmp ' mrs ft*a Applk l O*Yeerlry. Namlry Cc.. Pb n Pvka Ap W, d K RgivW Wmer QWRy Cb:S Bwd (RWQCB) far Jc mimlm am Sm Arm Wuef eadepm)M mmiol d l[dlmem dJhery deft comuv m acdAl m The Qd q Carol Bard R WQCT Beall deamr,e dm pnJenapetBn rtQadmu le�om- �t a;rrc� d ab Peoka JK plma Allptlin {JWf UC P+fa�'e cmnavz NN TWa'k �- Pgea AVP(� FrWftJM. PbM*G. BJ16 Pbr n PMJ=AWM9, Lc D(ft 01Y Of RWAo CUMUm and Rm NBbde DWClW band salary mn Ft. R ach pm}a awe GKY�az. Species pprlYVR dBees rtgwa lncdude Cm iulon a a mm mMrydaarrimmmdaiepa npacftavm a{Qur_ ere, W p:tim maMmppc daR qpa dalape. Pnrn@simummeda Ya I pvmY.tleipPRCKebrdnaoP Pmod Appikma fto- VaM BWIdkq aM Rfanimomacd mmalaR aver mRa iP{V kotl mdlm.maaaavey. sak" GMYIB Pa AB Npam aMR ara•m and appmplme em%Yada{ OuiOm mJ alre Os ampaed b ft maraca wW" by tk my of Raft Casammp CaaWPdly OeKlaPimW DNmmvaa. Peon ale iWa dhidlnR Pe kk•fm -Wllm aminaaq Pmjea Appeom BWWiq aM spray Prim kgft sof i^e°PpR°° aRaB De porWM brpopamd mnmvlaNmmmW sAwtns PamR hutlysmNmna9lalamaWmrblmaambW. RnWIBba6, ac} Nc open apes acaaBe fuR Ee aCned o carte [tvlopc hanld. ft)m Appilwa Pndnmlry. BdWlry Arai Pnr n Pojca App d, No pmdn[JWI p.UM..V oprnap ...ea[eprm ran Pimait anal ilea porn fa Whim W M~ Boyd mmm lmpmKa Cam' A pert dercl<p pan dull be apporcd prwr n IWance d P pd Applkan F gil nm. BwWin[ aM FHa io imim¢ a( a 6�adm6 Pa^n" Sfax ra Pko x Gad s Pumll H— . N .h m 11Bmlul MUUmnnB Ymppm Pogo i h a � 0 W p A ro w M m V � q W !_ ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MLLIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSBLE FOR .LIMING COMPLIANCE _ MONLfORING SIGNATURE DATE x.: x ,k� I— b"W*mftera«egr bld kmd PMJM AppP + Rwmhj.0xm *Y&P.t nmePMoWAW .r Dcrcbw� DwbtmL Pak a In Re D Nepmn000 RaMKlD"Cb=MialMstd n.fr omlroo FiiwN. None MYi6Wm MotibrMq ryp6mm . � � EIIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE L] �` 1 e -un.A���cwrfrry Mwfpam xruRa ren: eearrra m Serslon e.I.1�Y lk, plovl4 (See Smion 1.1.9) mn11r (orm RImnCCF- Iaer1R[anlal mqW= RS Ra911oDa artn pmpoaeJ (m Aevdwp vvtitll tsnW maeN (gpepe) Rsmom o open fp. Mmprm n Ne lalY Use aeclim d Yv MIR r Ue bu vim iaravauaelamrmv10o0 . Miupusararenappapir: f la leplMaiol m ariarc I.pnu .R rypfnll) aerea r y+e- boe- n.WrmoR0wln kedadplmiq -M miliprimaearsware suudrrae0 alpllxrinl RU1mr� aM noaN arllrl the kL lorq: la RraorrmollrrRMdad..(YMnlun. bpwil r a116tlY IIR Pmjea Apo., Plydq. pndllM M. RY16 Prim b Ompney Eownbanekvrmn were auadle brtlrion eaMmarliW eair lyr SamrY pw q fNR M RQLRO pnm b pY¢rva d fYl in aw NeR IIIR �a 9f-0II Comlrlml 10 Sp ft tlW-% neemraWtlpM b IvoeW dqp a W PmJlu AppRram Eigkmh rgylpp r prbr b 6nuae of Mwir rprsahme .arR AelaiN OOOIerLdoY aWkar sday Qs&h Nrmlu alaR h xkjm b Ne Wpwal d RIe Oly of Rar4m CRcamlp 3. Raver dope raCRR)'vvealplim rlaR pe rmErfm pmr�m PInRn Appliara flnoir.0bnx14�.BYN PMbPmIM AppovY. mgrsM haRe repreraaRa /aarelr lw llr amr apaeYY rope rll t sNdy ad PI ea7l plojM farlEfillp a+tir ah plppera urR.danRlap.ma lTC leMa emmlrlan Hurl WlYary viYl Rebalamtoplc oovtilvr. Inaar Oar.a aaCarrax falwR �I W � eaR ee rp111M b edrle U W- awmder mllolepinrI n rope c VdAW is * Y Iby old aY rrR !e so dim AWme 14Wy dWly F V.6 elrlly PWA r wwl, A aadQ role as r . Rla edviR serkr b r W i6bw Sam. arlVartY d W ara Rpwu ruR Ee a[amdlftleA h aomAal¢ di x b wNlacrlm prorYa. Rwfe��apxieaMefmmEllvmapY- are wUl Clnplm Yodme Ur(olr ENgbiry CaOe. nc�p Riulales eaMwaY ar Ipaanm. u lopwlna In Ih rxiprol d Nape rr01RY Mmp Ik YnW pumry phred SMWO rJavorYk a1WC m0loom r ercaurncRp. eY saY h mmna dry be II I m wdLrcJ Junnp graana I F]Iraltla m MWBrbn IA W, Pm6lan - I'w 5 d 0 s� J W z° ti Pv S� ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITiGAT7ON IMPLEMENTOR REPONS ®LE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE —u 1 IkWd�tafvlaioldfoil WYsehiR m fbftlbepfp.d PMkd Appkft PW=bq.Bgb"lq. B." PWWWPmJwf Appf d. pdafbdcfppfo.Yd.o Ykapedfkp ba Softy Plain[ ach POkd f+ )& .we 6NYkd ee m W beY..f of fah nprrt. C6 Wm fadidY.. lltworW.af d RRdcP.dt4tef"Wm - Y6f. Y KR Y bCWRJ b avllb vY{ w-0 Y APPvP&M Maobee, 6w {mwd�Y .Wy YrA taW11M iP^PI� b mt. fwbeW�dadbe two Alpin -Prtffo SbedY Shrill. awe. 7h /molftc /Wife Y.R.R bRaoul Tkwd -b ypor f l d tnc my d R.clo CLC.aanpf .LL4 olll" guile . 0 Ail.nc.rza whin do p.)W a flbil D l Is d con Makti ARHf BYItlK d.Liay Pdwmly c d mood loacMA. .i6 wiftk SLIM dWDlwf d$VedfWdb owwnfftmk delfte wwftm m.tllcefrlf: fecwfafaWd b7mgo llw. tepkfed fflfd.al mphceI BWWy 0l dW be f bJW b rt kw d appmr by do OTT of Rawty 0 ea BY Wry OepatRtRfa. 3 (WdWe *-"f &ldope b,ft pmyfefvk. vTM Make Appli. Pdlw, F%M Pwmeft d Mlub PmjW AWmal, Tim, TIM, Wd wedc)bm*b dm"mf fawyhbe&4SP Pmmyt cxmwnkt yhpnkd mb1 fM M doe of fwb n* n db wodd de toapwfr WW-Ubk. 6 7MVpoh ofbpe.kpM dWllc WAW fw Yl namwlftt16C Mnkd AWBh pi d Moan Tommim Tad Ra fkpl.... Plfmft 6..ld0 AppWd.tWh Ml 7 No hmm omap.cy .wdot. "I W pla wiW SB fcU or Mujru Applky PIAWA� R I B." Mtrb Mot.f Appmral. dill" aldf Of Tim Ca.mwyf fmR w Red MV Wt in fo Mmm Iq a sdm d Pift" adi rOpRUbk p,*m wib de Algal. Mbb Actuf IM. CatasWm dpdwb r Mil % Nab Mkipadon Mwbwin Pm - Papc 6 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MMGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONS ®LE FOR TIMUNG COMPLIANCE MONPPORING SIGNATURE DATE. u 1 Alm=s.Fe orft�WJMWcpb Wdnebp.ad r.B Po*d ApVbbp sb Bat no CMM Flood Riorn Pttjw AWp9. adMe to de emrratlely. r Qrd pp Wi de F ..lA.15. Cv.ol DWIO m BptVm oN Pmlea Ser. �Aleal /rerPlydDnYyepepredM &GCCNNkM 4mplmx* COrrlrlm bp. in AOpm 19M 2 Rord mtOA laulYa Ymt dt �.ttd. N Sm SvYm M Pf ar Apple S. BamAbb fir Flood flrlpe r eatdlr Plv prbrew�aerl.aOaMr<bMaci 10D5 d.*� w Cmi ID6u*BY Bmoac- nSpwY M MY Oq.. Pe.dbed bydersCOrrypmodU AdmlvWBo.iamia Wit CO.ptr pmmmlm frLLW Am be il=kpW YY eormtea d ptlr b pYV 0--Py r. a®ev[Ctl.dePrM{mb d 9Bp[nml &Sm d f e peedvcbprrl dl.tlY¢ r nwiRa by d.e Sr Baum" Flood CaOOl Olmfn Srs pm}apb.Yttb nYlp.M.�lbr Per dboeO tapavr a! pa.ee.Ibod Poeab efYWs ..r be po.ime. 1 ale e,p.e+m dre S.e se..be erWi No. eY s lso.leta PmJea Appim S. Bml.dl o Cm" Flood Ptbrb AWo.Y of en apap aY>ry n ruure pe.k 1b.a in bodt Ed�nnr.ed so Curml !11.81. m Fes' POlaa W Bdn.Y. Stv.be aQif1N11Et'dal� {BNnp�aVidC lbCR�YpIM1.d b1e X16 P11E1nBC0ehlilE Bml AIp.Wie.dt.e epllmrap.tllYrwbNOre PlirM.Sptndlttt CrOeO� Wie yPOeY dBNSP wvw msp t Pn*a Applm S.. Berordbo mttrr ROOD hbrr Appma AN. ob IIIIsebe WilplaMW Wi re NUYph.lu of&rcbp Cmied UWW ndBn/Ym- PoltwtA&N'pM d b A..a.lr ptabls relF r emd b re Wib.NtWe I.e Dah"W Bpfda pypn,. pb.Wit pla llbP tdsB Wirlude .B r.Wi.F rP� H7pmwd�sp dnrMrrer4.rrytrrPt V tatrlmpoY.�lrarrmd e.aasev.ImatPtiWr. t.pser.lmde.r Ftete .dpr.- RV.).ryy msrrdori Wm¢�YbrF Are9. lmrt, Odcp .ry Sntre.lerWM brit MP kVkwAn Fv dvekp.rn abrY be napasitic fv aB taY d 5 M emsim msml plr full bO de.rloped w :sppaoard b Pr*a Applimv Fpa re %b BYldbt N Mor b im of G.dOt rY cormmrOpO.cur,uea pror to de lfvace A P+d Wie Snfar a.ebq Pablt pasta Mr.M. Not! MtOteim MoNmriry Pmpr.s - Nge ! 0 Z � O m n r io NW z° a, ETIWANDA NORTH SPRCIFIC PLAN _ MPPIGA -nnm luaiwm nrwrr, oo�...o ... MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSRILE FOR MONITORQVC TIMRVG COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE DATE n TheMnofOorMvelr +ItlwOelntlioevcnpAw Alenftlr n.KM I mdAm sy be ffm by a •afyry d Pl* ACVHr Swan -- e Rm6 Rbpfbrb appfoefl a6 rcbe 4rt Pboblwb�ffldbfplA O ��UefbT �' Wch elcnP�YOm k,g d lrp6n l"N. dab ft wdbrea. P�Olatlon VuW MWn ^Rn Tas b S[ 6171e17W wm Cmlalon Ane prim w lobe.SpetlYp parbftll'ftbfMlbclrPOref lnerpeetbf fppn aFY Tm wle h Cti'' W Cburry WWI ])babe bI Sb Bm dWm FbM Co Uf Feat bechu lam a be pbvMei by mvwbbm of MOON Fa i"lae Pahef eppl - nr Ypbesrw epmdM wd e*ft. wMd.�a afaba Afa[ fbfR SPetllfrparty bapfmbeaf WA ralalbr.>; fbfil ba mNttrnf Mp1 h W. 1il. P s Mbfpeefm Rfq Cflifw . 0epmfen M Fah N Co. 1601 /IW3 Apeamf, r U.S. Aver CNP d F^*� pl pmrir, H perlff m rcqule.l. frcaabE* —*V of-P -W erbrbrMWU.wbae FLrrfyrb Ugckdfpn.. Vida fa..Plebe efmf.apee n erHlbx be lOarf6r U.mffbb. sms dwoawsis sd"'ksbbe•rapr Mfepe bblaf0FM%% dMMWMWD .rn N h C6no partlwaer b W n i. lie PbrfMa IIerN SPdpa Rb bfffawnay.a RrfYp Rb fbY1 bepeWed brhfpplkra rNbhapbppewe b(fre.rpre Rabl Applbla rmmk&RFcm. Rbf"amnogm b° plmaalbf�MOrfhp .b4mapklNrolallfllelflf(pMYp( a.H sa rb FMA AppwaL bpr►W aer applloflen lar6nrlopfaera MOYnh plb aru aelfrpp.b flc.eaW as or ue speanc Rrf. Cam fppfwYeMpB'p Flretle rlonn Melptloe Mwifwbp PaYara - Pase 8 I - - -- ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSDILE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE I. Afglcas far Onebpwug 6M psrve 913 aaea a PNWy P,*a Appkwg PWmkt& FibgxAg. Army Regain¢ MSa. Ran prior awdaain +ni.w°'p¢.mimes.�9e�orEio XYbnY cupa paa tce... cairon" bnr.rwjmmpprc, Ird Faew.irclua�ag 3a3,otaanaR..hopmpe, dPwoeaYdm, Dept of FA ea Gave aN powbg app d ENS . aY gdh do 9re u, b W Day bark Ca god 139 wgw a nmpg CYSltcon kgkmenwd. prbr ro nwwY opmce, dparkn wrrWom rid wildbfc ba6ha b upper p proka approval. each P wd. cacy Pwi- 2 AppiiegmbrhreYpvg aaRpeerredeweepd Mdapr- F!o} ApOlcaa pNmigg.F •Aawy Re mmxm Rai Prof ek eyadae w eidora ed waWac Area' b ft NWdea 00"V Cwpabage .Cailfoia wMrpmlcarpprovaf9l- de N dww Fate. The ripidan wrrNaa bdgd ikeORaR DrR of FL A wtl Laic aY bang ppovY a FNSP. `Maadwaw aA Mine aala lie aeda alY dal rAw rtlF N Rang CbrgMaion lwpka d adon prior (o beck abp h amw aoxA soma W.NdM1 bofk"aid pried approval, each d ®pr waedrd (or dreigaam aSYebg dal rbcin m ism a pro) - fagpebarmdarewAApeRAB. bombrwweewM dedly'g NiWwe Derelopwwl OullRwra, Pwwb or kw dap 30 perept medipwral Aablrwman swraAd=W wpeandead c way W barY wieAk for rGldmtlal deraapwva vm 3. ApptlewaabrdereRip• vac "P h9h aces arragaYapm goal Appyara RanYag. PaglnCMy. Amy Raaaroe MW. Pan prior W m. ,Waal mrd^ WA wihilk la"m - M Sw. Sevare CaP, a Pawb a n CWkrek W &wF- *clmpPr W rd- watlkepogwtlYbperbdcwmWwwYbimeaewlryame Da9t of Phh m Urge, and being pp k of @1SP. amok Am 4 agYwieed. 1%a oominim ag dbrig dams a de Hwarq Oarielm hwpkweaadm por b woraSO Snre wa�Ym sawom4d. prokct approves. each P-1- a. Apprraafaedrebhaar faRpiee Macesanneahopm Pwjen AppUk Fi wd g. Egbmft. Amy Regnx MgwL Han raw _ apgfi.dPYlrlwriiYYa NrWRBAWiwaFilwMawaa6mM Corp, a Broreeo. Ogbna nMprok wpo dN- a wiann Ares. The wes waD be adRdeg2y wide w roe Deµ a RYr wY Os. m bwbg wp W a Wp . aYwrew pd" b fadh tm IDe worewei a lap wiwaa (a PIMUg Cbwwiwbl iwpkmenmdon prlof la Yaddl(theo eealconidw*.h rbiwr�wNals pwkd approval. each bR). dta Dvlpr raY.rdf aY biRenag a the vd(dik conWd laatl W a pmjOC1 wwWee wN the RI.P f Et.waaa Noah Mirlgaion Mowwdng Nog., - page 9 cL d u m• m >w ZZO F N N pN td ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM _ MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE /s 5 Project AppRu[ R=i1"L Ppajbrcdn4 May Raam¢Ma-L Plain pkr riBMFiiwuWrahloWONrRwDM ltainrmldanot>YM the CDWO( agloSn.CWL Rµ bfkRpojo.onlfd- RMP. dPWand Brae. and phi irw bekq pporr of 019! Coma iapkae . pbr to plo)ee pp".1...h n lla EHralOa rlbBkmnidorrWlm rablbad 100focaM a O.y. • •"I•_ Plwsft Pfl/Ye d,4. Ala/ PRIM Ram MFK PImRm NNIRLIFJISnSeYrer BaniRmlc BKadmaYReaWR parklbhSm Se•rnc petllry E/iaa 1.1.3.mE /,nmrRrl CwpdBromea.CWf Dq%. piaabapOJeuliporr mSa SCYairc rW mMdWYReIAKns. Of Flab t Daa A planning folbrinp pp.sl of Nrlabn R/Y.Yplavrr. On, b pcJen ppponr. Mich y AppikaR fordRKkpaa brP pan MscmdLaRRrl Opel Pnpe AppiyR Lam' wry' Map N Ram Mi7m +pas ad MNOkhRdW bORy (TelFMad yrtaMg VOa4. l chrBry Nr 100. ea aW a a eidga m ua kf the Day �p d Bprm6 Deµ pdabBmpo 1 6mf Wrkf P"4WL d phi ! ORBe t Miry fdbalnB ppreYr d preval of , Caaaf prim b poJG Rigawr. earA pOlee p. ApplkamkrdmbpamdaBpea/Klilaar vWmd -akkb tl. lclbRaaea.pmaidganolnla awbbdlODfefbf PMIW � �• . Any Ram Mao Ll Plaflm rllllk�aLdOOn WMCrtgvRad.leaepeetlonbrlbend fbLpd Bomar, Calif prlowing plpro,al of y�y �kd sdN pa RA1P WM h Ralsfb (bow PiR A phasgt d PM ! dse t Miry R agpaosr of Ph had MbccmiR- nwoni Mae maalaleL @RT.1a wab.' whht a Rancho Ie/aAbh Ralr3b ClRaabryr Rn paaienkn sadf. PfoW mSad app"fmpbr b pRO)¢l ppmYr, eRdi PMJM 9 Appikwa foa deYelopwn ba0 Rrcp h rn m,on d pmlk P." AppUcaws Man &VnMbW Raadb Pbin Peo)ee Ap ai. Omde and h San lkn ComlY Hood Cowl Dania b ft vain amuN "Ammon r thin odlily ad now mnml daanel m omidxR. WICK n =ptlRd. rtVeSclelol rYll llr lrihl "Wei. pia t plalilg Oonain, n11 mninrnviNth RMI'W the Raa[In CLcanoryaHrt Peeabn Sndy Whert rtymrtd.(uflmMificaiuRrirl bean�ige/viabh ReThHlurmmRa i -irt Pmt film Study pdraidr N hawla on nRaraROdry Prepran . pan• io ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN -MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM __ MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING ____j COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE Id SIM MWAL r,WlH CESf a. 10 Nojed 40kad fIaNV.b-qlsmdng.S ea- 9Wr Pi n nm pofca wnooamnbar�ar ,r,..iep.e.i:lstamd..mdr mow CmM FWW OxoW ypowaw.miyp al n.Ye,i. rhN +r rm,dwhYe. DirgkmmAA WP k.+rbe omen, CaUt Dept. d Flail R of ENSP. bap®e.w.b1 eexkp�a.aurme wrCatvMrouipdmrmra prbr Ore. Arr can d Flw aaa P.b. b MOO Rpmrd. d Y4riYimrMh,tltr ndcrebped precis wab ik Pako a dfloka Cp fagbffl mApmlua Appkos aW Ym b Sane we kaYNUtl of c mm" loud PPJed AWIkrF rlgaaaltv� Engweedi Sale- PhD p1m m "m M*l M oirmn bemR D, Cal Spcaal tO.a.ad aor Bred madam Poe Cu.m1 DiftkL �prwY bRawY.tlp.arY and Dal Cal CTknd. nd1 d d Dry Cmii abb 0.6iA CiW_ aPt d Fick l Game. of MW. ImpbvaWm mlklminlpbedr rebdydhow rsdNmrYOln YbrlY A.rr Cap at FAO rd p.br b p0im Xp1Rrd. b, ay.b hafts, eo.O of de d lean win Dar Cmdt M nodol cDombo n each pmkd . 0.4pdm rem. 11. Appikar bedadapma." hapemm. ikb0oak/ raks h*dApplkr. Plmry. Fha ayft Rooft PYa b P"M App"al. n rra kWrd pm)ee. kaprsm YLrW ravb h,bkr. Ile Cti<rmpFle Pabtdm Dlr eaa PmPel blprh.t ribs, YWl be iomp med by Pr RAe a.d 4.{iu Rk4 Amy Cmp. of Bbems. amens am, 6c n'jaa� C.W apt dFM! [Ire rd rG/Fm Vdal ,hWb:pvd dvcdlorl.maal.yen.prs Fts'"tM GCaadaalu. rev- A kaery rd kplrar pmtar b. Obma.adnt K s Of d6n,d vehicles b atad open What b Yr0 be kwk-m of Far dow Ydl he b dr rrda.ds ad ped cAAmdde RhWandde ClayaF RmaP C1oaW •w pl.," M aok cm Ara rev . be bribed br .esl,im b m mm .pre b lk, ham pmposd.eddt.U. cag.-mut am mtlrry r.. ' bW m.k Ydl be meYmai s.ld do Pdrma Nosh Fiat PnAedka Stud, W ..y -01 10 m S0 ken iavldb -nac Ad rodlloom plm W. b O< eak.r P..", pr- bre nll%W rejedi0a h1 opl W cc [ILL roz w° m A EavaMa Noah MIO ■Yb.. AR.donap Pmpnm -Page 11 c w <p Z . 1 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM -� MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE DATE •A ratiKpia pk tlWlhe dmiplad bane abns.A.W Ironer ealc era for meepetrlm of graded w. 71" pdk nYl Ec MrNrm wNA Vr bad rnodlllteVon pkn -Rlys Errkn rnlrkrcMgrtlrWKErodeKgeladrl lWierUefW*WlrEdepwAn im Jedu tdcnded r ornpanrim fw devebprrRd rd MV Yb Inpede HWw L,prw Vt ability of wlMllk 1Y mry Into deKbpd snn. '71e Rwoor¢ Mnags PWr for the ft%r r flraM pe- M1K arrlwWEanlenaNtlegaale rM -W pmww. to oopj b omlmnion win Rr marep Iw Ft r W1111 EVwrba l/ottA SPNfk Pln - ShWrobdr. dunlmWr. Cron prortothe d1OYtw di Mc or 0bEcE iEY dnlir m Arden b be d prior b the rcu poJeq l... yproral In k SPedAa Rn am. Z AppWb fardeKlape "reWnlbcmofmp imh*" Proles AONkbI Rrbin/. f lm� GVf. P ae ;ceder I.PM rM a .. 3 acsn of rlparir haEbr oo ne Lv*:t site Dtp.Phh&0 eAmy0xp. Pli prior b Rtal pdjm of6ekmn, WPridrW0m- Mr&Abwkq nid wow al M@A4, i pk- rC�. pbebpu*l IPP —di. CmI for 3. Applkr d.,dop�Elwoptntbn hh It CL7afRrtic PMJem AppkrV Rrdng, Pi(lsmhq, C1Vf. Rm l l rdhSm Bmmdkm Card lion CarW fWft wcwm,arp Re PKaP� "�Me.�bpd�tllKYleApf�nrlallr� RpLIMdOrt.Am /CbP. Rrtprbrblka pm)m ritlpbnplanprllmbarymgYlutioMbrSettlon kill wldVJ FP I NWFAMAMCM. WPO I'll I apeeaeA+imm RCCOfGaW,Smipn Ad pemlu /lwnde ACOC ° appoYYnfPJASP-.rpk- r oprlafbpmjew e AppikWA fm devekpnem Nall Main Swim Id01 w I" r mu lmm ft(1*6 aN Seoim a(k prmnn from Ve M'OE Ro)en Appliun Rw�p.6lplmyR Sr V pWga prior b p'),, p -RnainR w• . ur.lM S.. "lr&F.n or rh �oC�>FlONf]t•dVird[l AppMYal, PYh pm}eei (len caner An) M /C�d �ry C� rd Ch,C l PLwrba Nosh MMgdim Marcia Ro m . PW 12 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM _ MITICA'f10N IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBI.E FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE IS Applkaa tr &vck mna aW elW a mil{mim 50 ttM Pbjem ApplkAr Plaxlk% rWkwh .CADcVC Prtpf b Pmjed Appmeai. .h.W open raw Ndkf Man popmd &- *lams nW my d Fi &Gr . Amp Gepd eaeA ppjem >V PekQ aw AarWq Cm- mlsian 16 Apppksdf developremdM paa ft prsa{aed•W- n**AppOM Albh{,Paldmpb{.GDep. Now b PmjM AWmal. mam206im- aridlsmblrapmire6aRaslbrdb{mapm of Plr l Oche, Amy Cwp d eadt To"dw taaM vaa t boa. Appkeam tr hceNVp a alb pme..c N dnWap &I{- mad Pin Cm- of de Non em Rend) of tmdl and medl.el of de pm 6a. D ft alraa{m ol4 and mission dl CAW Pavh sc- talln, ddepr6gmepopuedb GeYwe4 hb¢dercl6p- Iron Day Cmk and el 0o btelldab Ise srbdrktl pmm mpp w&4 dl Per Pllrrde C e seanebbrrsrm of dmme *Wow. Il Rope Applom Pdoeb AOJm Appwdl. rmldwAplavae silaanmMN°tlsnrma, " dbged6c d PSS Z Oche. May Corp of Each Pmj" pin meaIXpmvbemkl {rmadlfaoIXrbde LURlaod ACOB Pndmea 111 SWm Pdm Setna adAmeb{faamda- rm Id. 9efss deb ao(Wva"mARrWPmSapSmtbCmrmlty Pbjd Appum, Maarns. FASr ttn{, Sr Pta ptr b Rm pojm mYglodbbarld rlmm Wawlabdl CDPO, and dole,, aemla.. mmp Rwd Clfm R{awatbbmb{appmsi abpelsebmdbmpansbYrtrnpsa mdapIX aawr ad Ddmlm and Aamb{/b d@ISP: womcmdm m°earllemtpmmdmwi . cm°entlmtrdelmad myan pb b ppfea appbrY. WaellrmAYaW Pn Sa�SonllfarmaW terraaprmaa- each Plojem dnerand 1: J. nr CDPO aftim do WpcpimcmpmWhm •mWRrepes vakwrplpmdlp.ddba2Clmt,Gla°Idt Cock and Sm Seeatm dmWta and r Pavony mm of dz L ADMPoftoanrIXaMchumkmtlr 4ldasad rapeyra - aY a aQNk hd*m pllrae. 19 Pmjm AppDOm Alma{- Rndmmb4 G Dep War. eda Camk wall San Swift WMIL or bear pbjse dPMkflare.Mrp Cblpd naTdt UDMPadrTmtMw .drroalrlscrtser, tr Pear m pip{ Cp mepmmwdea w*%vd tpeclm, bclmtb{6lmIYaibdbdm °fin Son An FJ v anpdr al, de, lk dm -swned giwfl e , Ise Sn Dic{ ocomlawtcd4ssN .ndmMtpcdeabcpsdutionwtls N Je CDfe; If kaW:. Ue PmRn yWl4 mwerercd ndefplia{, ` m FYwaMa NOM MW {alImlMWmn.g Pro{rrn -Pone 13 n v X N � ` aW OW ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION _ IMPLEMENTOR REPONSBLE FOR MONrMRPIG ,LIMING COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE DATE 13 hibwhtn. vyr.w.bore.raaNe.nMfW .� Spu�ANes ynlel Ne I aMb b de a fftl Spcdflc Rn my he iqulm0 b wftlpe polutlal tlka my mgWmd midSm 20 ConilN wM dw.p ky offt&n Wrwdm NNaW IbmR.de hvjw!Apptlwrt ihdw SN Po1Ra Service AW=W Re le Nmk WPo doll m. dderdh.* wbabuly, NFURebl n mPIN d"c.."m a vo" Nhf(wbllwYl(OIOYNCICCII { pIW pppplgNNClomy PDrdnoJftpopmd&mkpwnn. TowudldbpN,pWMly kb IwW Hdindc N�IUW FaeR M NatluW Fe1ut 18b daN R om DNr F Dadra if m•1 pm lcy -byw R S.,k ftk Nr.p Fn $h gdekrd.1aFdr mw.rkw edriry dm m1 adenely Impu wattlltl yrW7 atl wltlNk haNiu. 21 bofda 0 r wkMfe haMMd llpNb/adja bops Rofeo AppjU Fhn*k EmonubPd Mwb ►reJen Apporal, yamrm, dY b Df FIRpNM CywWyeR Pad nelOn i Mime Weld lip - IuvWIY rd dkkkd InawA a wq dr NhRtlmlm b ansltl dim b do RrRll aM aoylmm open y.w aw. U#d MFwpRNkw Pli'WWMdNhepph611tl M"Df/R Rujep AWHN RrNry. FiMbeeaNM aeA Fllwb RbJmn Ap .I. LADW wiry eoNieoR. % M de t, D" W ft mddw, P. "Fdraae yam W&WN dY1 In aam.ged. dM mar Ne RaraiM cl,4 ral PKb PMJM WmWeftd n a nae -dyt baah. Sad N/DYM daR me Ne prmlued tlJamn b. Hlalh peaerrew w ik aonWw. F.Mt mJdmWI rydtl he rFlrkftl aOntlrd[rekyaba amdrd ofdRSpdhc RbwCmatlww,COruwn, atl Ruok- d" a. FPilowa: •Scam Yyw w Mercury Yyw'Uam IlpMiry" dtll NF Pm Wd. '7Repaym DfNaidmitleRkrlDrllhltlrydW hAncdelul PWavwW NRN1ry, Irc1edNMaecvrgyNlPrNry,dall NeaNeMed FmjM Appik" ry VRerkw nd PtMbM F1keb Fluwl' k loc wdndwilumwdndw3me llatlleywMpoprlr CmTl�in parA RDJep SmlNllr. lkarnNre IiRMinF ddl Nc EiavNraFN F W" -Nash Mbga Mwrlb Pp -PW 14 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONS[RLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE. MONITORING SIGNATURR HATE —_ as 22 All pnatlm Pjm APplkm Ralpt Rcv wmwwft Plan Plat POjm mmJw lle arA.h i�^^wl en CmmIY1m AWm+J..Lim PO PlL-- ebe$pmRORan ReAl dblandrape Pew ppeblkfl lkptw mw.d Pbrb w OY:uWIVPbe rry, pub�rye, anE 4NeW., ow Pun p cF O-V —Y uo pt•II Nb Ye eNee tpcle n We �+Wea euatd Foible. ft 23 6b�w b awa pdeaalm bt wimWe " ee wqW for Flgea AppR PIm wq eM Pw okq Cbb- Coo0lem pelor b P jw = d"dw Oe• wpP teeth &,do m +mW4 a We Wm APpPey. EKh Pmkp. wdN of CYOOIkiOY. Caween. -W Rcwkd e, b bck@: k plm rutka PYIOr b 0..P y �R.M.,awlmn.l rs ieu ee IVYw naeetlopd ea6 rWln do hlbYapptmesian elYe. `PwteNnld pm, whWoS tan vA dom tbtR ee pobib- �bs AY. or b4bim pep 4bw rs. uYW rtl 6 -wo ieY�pd ftP L open tpYe Y:Y vloit tRe Specific Pltn opmW 21 Pmfm ApplkM Plrnbl• PgbembC• AMY Pbe PrW b Pepjm be'. b Re n..Wm eY PYioe. Y 0er11bW b de cwp of mol Fed Pber Aipma . hfto llm beieb� cmd tiI b ptnide . t A. li`YL IeebYb[ d gcw "m Amli M W 25 A Pgm SpmRc Rte Dd( SWy duR be pe*Mmapbpm PeRIeC Applkm PAR*V.9$J Iq, RCPbe hiorb Pmjm A(p 41. b3'9bfRl blW WtbeB EemandtMd pbtiO pgm eppm.i. PC e.910 obuke ne FlanYq (...h" 9l Pgm 26. Tbc nY OfOryCws.wO(Edw C�e."md of Pmko Appl FbmF des and Fttrn hjm App W. eotOm brmA of do CFCa.vp Fq WY be m* Y opa nwwm C'Or1Ylan EKt. Pm)W tPOe AbO, • meervatiot eeme WpR be tOUtiY b Me efoe>•vefmYawA. FaiwaNa NOYh MiRdelwn 6RYJlOAnp ROpram Pp 15 IA N w 0 N A N b OW z° y N a ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MMGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENWIR REPONS ®LE FOR TIMING COMPWANCE MONITORRiG SIGNATURE DATE 1l Tc Pna u mbofft u Angela Power dddpq rmba. x111Mrie NrluW fioa eo.Wy,(L,. n*,Applludri l MMM P•ddecriM Ml arb prbrb Sea►la}a cluNnp Rhardrleld latl mNnlrie Nabatl fiddm Roatldy), MWtmilona mdavaof pupafBMYdeer, Calf ofllmmd(ioeab Apildp iPanld Stf?f ,kIpie- Fbr/1de Crock rilYl4radial For d • Rlrablrl purlulm rlVlmplkrbM Allw41 Fm Sau6 NMIU Prune priabde lwd¢Mlew,a FALa ypOeY Corridor edMrioldtl. dwebpne:A 4w'eIA 7� I.IDMP I/1YYf Corridor pdmBhCoy 6QJ It should k mCd MA be krbilify ofmdtlWq add oAIIIaft loom,' mof Milken a Rlrenddlal A&OW Fin Scup Ndiim Rpene nmW depend, in Arabe. Con. on mltlueer m de prr of Ind N deyo,Mw VadNa "Ong nph¢aend of Ann ja Fm Save Rcella tlwapp epr rinser S. Gobrkl VWkrIWM Vale, pNn F Wnndr None MAlrieim Manon one - PW to ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN -MITIGATION MONITORING PRO(.RAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE: MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE HISTORICAL RESOURCES t m forprmb btic PmJniAWikry Arrd*t.onaw Aeerwm Rionb)m AppovY. sp\mWimpP *ap\aa, gndBc Vin nra poor n PNro gmvY, n rrBirY luurb CmkYm rtl Rmh4 FrA Pojeu p1upa riUb: owHNd6i \SOFA- aeNBCA rrtiumlogfRnl� Cbelwim a pWYirE EiApAgom � geBO\Ary Yb: •Hkbk SPZOre. CA- Mr- 336'YH •HWa SRC .CA- SRF6166-11 •OHG RraAHas •H -1. wA v\pP (Idmtll W s g IIft W C. V. (CA -SBr- 3131 H) •I 8- Sb WM HmrbO (CA S&-)M H) •C. W. S�iWC. W.A Howrgkr0(CASBr-31nHl •A Bknfoe HWmc0md(CA- SW- 311OH) •Br6 r ilowear d(CA M 313}H) -Om, khI Mimg Cmlpk.(CA- SBF3133 -H) •tu A.'ed. !)pr a Wra n6 tower Tsr+mlwbr Lko (P SE, )6H) 'balm H. 1(A- 1011 -3 H) Wwr WoW T6t calm "dpaxam al *= Ienrce *AU k namkleg. rd•eaaiB6 «ioriYlaRewm wlas —dab r ,- urn b ee prp: d btw W me s. a mwk `siea TLk rat W kci0e: a A W aft.0 w 6e m� ow W N\lory. This wkfid W is YtA " IAtl 2 kw of Itc Cme A�\orl. Reomkri NSwc3a'\ iemrb. Doc nft wwYpaw Cv wwat M Bi Ce wCanT Wrrr Dwn rM6iA lbe WW& Plnrea W m.,% RR Yn h ¢vknA kr dm& w Be wopv . wauka ptlerca rtl EotteeYhon o! Nc \ws i w. 6 PrtPrrrion a r rtlwt 6HY1i� W fiMiryp. neauM ge upufirvre of Ne ric, atl rtcanmeMxwn fa funber >'um. �f rcrAW w O FVi ". N.a MiugriaiMauiaint Nogru Ng II N � N l` 0 z in N G4 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONS ®LE FOR TIMOVG COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE 4A 2 As a CWWWM p]WW m WKKJ C n m4 far prada In h vwk pin a pow b FOJW vpr'w'A. wbnrrc tmma111p- Itan NJI b cWKwd Wf s SOPAQnlfed andredo[;L WAbr FMJeu APPWM pkwjm 3111r1e plmPallm Mm b p')w Apppral. wall dNtMn m dr fnlloi ate.. Cp Wmawd MOWN FAhprpjera Carielm -M wk Srrw mCASBr5WH •Hismk SawcMe. CA S8r4I66 -H •0b Ouch I 1loaae •H -1. rod waW (14"fkd a a IPd0r br camp, (CA -SBr- 3131 H) •1. W SNWm Hmnrarad (CA .SBr.3BM -H) •C. W. S KW. W. Men Hmfkwd (CA -SBr -3103 If) •A. BkNm Ilonwrad (cA- SBrJl1oH1 •B.*wy HmenraJ (CASW- 313}X) Y300rp bimbo MWq CoMk. (CASDr- 3135 -H) li!C4b.=1 dofica of BI[raimNtl brw.r.�r uAa rmaghe afdcama Nallb 04W•v orlon M 71" . dig k wkpmrarbuJryadernnatofNamkYweraL wort Natl YbW,: L pAPa ud doneaudm of eaN ate by awn of O -WvW/, merbmwa. na & .tp. b Calirdan oramf.a naaWNaawk tams. c. B.u.rkn04k mr ur%tkprpsamlplMw On la cc Mnmk. pW dmyw d. fnprrrlm or a mpon ddWWW an Mdbp-aaamirlg de sivok m W de M. m i secmnmuldarlorw For hrtlbr acdmi, l(resded t NMrrmsaiNOfda:I.oa Apk.DeprmwwNWaa : rsrtl POwm Pm)ua AMHcm P1adM HWamk P raim pdmb ROjrd App A. irariwnladm tsea NII b mrYrrod q a paYI11N Naawbw u a Caamladml w plw iq WN Pm w rmrive rran mT mtlitim far Ne MenedpR4 lfd Hna Cammlatlon world b a0enW Wv d piumd dercbpmud, • pmugrwde nmrid bd mginocring drawings of d fiow JWH by Np by s SOPA amfiN artWmlirynw andrar yaJified Nxnrim Mw� NOM MYIgatlan MmWDrft Pmg -Page It ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM _ MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR RF.PONSIBLF. FOR COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE 4A nam finder u sm dcapuW impure ryvtma b dt yank pn P .jea AFOIi RrNry. Fba P2xrvmm Mw N PmjM Apnovd. w dWl be na pked by • 9"idd Nmafn r. eme.dvc u.a C ®miarfm W Plums Ea P.�a ay cmddm AdcWlA iaweddbe..dY vme].Ma•1.11 Ee Cammiadan prtpmmd l..bdbs pbnPSA><mmna. 5 ASOPAKe.dded WUedopmmullbe preooed.rW dtl�O.dc Project AFpka At•bV•' �f •m Pdmwi . .f mcaJ" i .lewrmwfthi%AerrtJOeMbrpo)eclt lelpdoa mvr gLbmelaYm on hw Ftmm PSp ]lt ..chw b o by Am .We. Ne de dope. W 9l ft ProjM a.V.omdbertWad de mnd] 6 B ad and vlitlY Qadb[ .Nvdw N QetN vkb y of m. Pv*a Appkyt *o m Cndn iamufled mLWLC Uea .bdl bL mb ..d b]. SWAmdm.d Med sally Lmd Pfu.br campjxa a.lrmb{h. ndem:r�it lfobmbWd. rar"Wpbr.e. 71b CO...%" eecASaodlmbubemt:.+W •heyewedbe POJa..pptlwe. n�mmvm6e.[P.dbii �auv<afesive..nbaovYy.ctlri- tinbbwet .itr�dry,dmmvamplimrksa.AW. PMmrmy b.Y Ynahe d.igd K eambj "my wftofim adnmpka teM FAC Geoec] and dn.dmof tlt roibriry tlWl be O.atl mde po6emm.d.dpv.ddtappDg mWwfib�dmdt bins!K.rr.d. 1110 vd pr.p�rJF F@a.. mM b tiiLl. p gk•. p Txa laYSOW d w1 w ¢f h Tt mG.nbdm dll EM We .�.EO.Y1 b moP.r pom oedm.o.tmbLaNYabnsYrWw evAP+ a41-O.dm b . jralod of �l -baua n .ma dt tlpollcaow d roe IYd. ] bdt c. rtl drt buwic mnWm.rt ar.a.ubd duM(.awr.tlpn NoJal Appli:.rp Pithy Wd ftow-b mtbr O .dYi pmorL dullm.Pbdr .t.ddC mt n k"p.. do eemrvy jmop.a cn EC d.KYyed rd 1u nv+M 7Yeovma fncn.p.p�.MLLbcUCecynmUitigddt {. Abbmwk Anrc e.raawbddud.{depujmmu0b.dar.d pojm Appk.r. Kw" Gr.ditpn eCadn n.bLY raft tkaeb.e rm.bepoprf"d brwrrlm,diyby. {a*.Y Pn..dun mrd.e by W.Yfied rtlnlan. Cwa WavoardWibemr..tlbY � tlr hwn pojm dncbpn F,uvud. NuM Miup.bn Matinnnp Pnipm�P.Bc iv d O A N �D a w n V 0 2 N Lmn ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONnORING SIGNATURE DATE 4s Cumlffi4L RESMmen 9 Tie �v Nlbek l rt '19 ' � SW be RPIM Applkwe R�IF Pack —blR ad 111Drwhsuted d Xr Odl cwm of de pmled V% Dm PI awe%wd Slpdp p), pwal 10 ReR ft pwWNe NedKAwdlm WMYdfw,NeW RMis.Dr ft*d AppkW Rmb[wditk-Yr OnMRWwkCow*l NwiK Amdlon rN /wv iDled b.�de wkh 16wW Ike plry Ro1e4e WdNmdlm.SD 7070.7ddell wd RpfaF(kdD,fd Sm m 7097.91. 7097.91. and 7097.99 Of be PIMic Ream Cole I Wfoll e.Irc7db/: •Smpw irt-- ieeywd[ de Cm yCwwv. -FWI ,w nodfl."C de C.. W n w *mg dqe b <rwnbeUCie.rh lfd¢ew. Nmhe Aw rk�hw N loon b e ry de Ne1K AmeduD HerkW Cmwlwlm LANAImmuew Wnpdrydlewm Udy 6nmdmf wd bmlVw w ®1pot"offtI aim&Aft yfw M of Iwe I9e1, de Nwhe Awedrn IkAlµe fbmnbabn Cwl h amwcle7 w 917 Cepiml Mdl, Rom 216,StmidyD,CA 97611.(916) 722 R 1. Regdlry my dlee NW. Asekm AId)woloyy Rewwwe Nd1, Ue NWn Amedrwl M rftW meublan de0 he c mike&. Npw dedr aware Atki ApD W Nwlee Amdkm Oo4 hR he deRatE Mt I % de dllpotl Of 1folmdt)ded Ad711eobdul Re ARCNAROLO(;ICAL RR. OMCRS le P.wApw}el)ppika bfdtlkYebpnendyllmeDh�{mh RODde Plwmhq *P w de i- �he9er McWf d Wku l rt7--' Rhea Appllon pl�� P #b SeERYRd d IDIIDS dea K bu oD • V--*.) on a dcKkpewe b pmpowd. ApOkximL Psh Pmjw ii No pe t"RD ) -"- we r in do Vwfc Plm rw fbr. crer,W eveF..dMmmim. whrrtr,b.Jt rurd rtmrim . whirhpercnllr FDwdelaYed dunrtpeaA PmJed Appikse Rmhp. plp�p�� Meednl. =M nrttim. AS(R`A DWmIq wd Wdy — Fih F.)m PiiwwdeN MMpwkd MGM." Pg. -PW 20 FTIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE DATE RIIIfKI IFORyIY dYLVea Ce rYll� N. RWldtit for plojeal nlfl(MIT. The \ oadnpp Nct mlfig rtMYOpar rWl a1Y1 Nara Ye eerebpcn and DaYMt ualmc- .d lm na o1 Me mnrta of Wia ab0r' �t,. ASaPAaxlrYil .N�sabpnfuu ec,earrcn.r ee eapms a Pmjra Applk— Plamlry. Engke.g ue -Idol. ewvy Gadillt IeluYe plPjal O4rebpen .balaYlor YlcwW pollPMru Balding-4 safay faWKIOrCY1tlYYRYatlaJ. b I*I YIY dMaar Of alab lfe naM araoa{ca '� feayeler N malim d mr ft moaYUleKrrB beerrdm NcpakaYimaljuepeatdwtalrle ardrsabdr Bab a ul mcareY. teflr/cau frai A lb dm cYIeYY wrYtea re rbp.aW. the rdlrobpr .eau e..e Ye s j aYleaYr b crop a rmpoaNr Yi.en a.rYalm raidab b papal of li IIYVn n aaam tlrenyriBaYBa due Boea. as h erc ewY erar alpYfia�a rdratobgkal lurrs w 1baoKT3 ft Fa Appli KEW %. PngktrIrV arre OaAYg Pabil CalYn- dY^teaupmardAr Qadr. ar elYtflrYG bP M drl aRa a! Bwmkw N sday perPrgCprb.wplc- YeairmYl an+pPK4^ae era rvwe0 proDaa rrr Ec Oe rlopM a m o. Prla b Oaal- W 1rplaeeoY Tecarafrardrapopa aeaY ee llr rapaYi. prYY euYr NeYaa AattkPat. SA All WbWAW9 u RlWYW RmKI'r O MI Ile proja d.H ea R-�q arra Elwr..ft GmAV ptrblr Cc.l Oardbabui leaMY "er paperf wkka baarraim pq PlPaWrt. eepk- Nglar..oO Vac by QnaBBVl rlbWa Cara fw aWrim &A M aY."a Pa b Omr arwerW b, Ye Pblaa woi Wq 6t lre pYgWYIUUmkpl 'Jl oiYpalm ncMref WlLecNBaaeb Projca Appli pw"aalB$W.Ikq OItlYyPY CaYb- W --P a d ee notal pwY Plrr. per Plwc&m enpk maYrkn pbr b f%sa- prer FAJW6 a NvM Mbgriao Mm long Pnr Page 2 1 E7 9 10 w o rD N N M m apF 2 N fv _ ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR .LIMING COMPLIANCE _ MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE �. M raR. kwh4w N tle Ca y Dw� DeRbprrl 3I a.a.wdD*p0WdcUm.:m . of & aUwwwmspeano ftjW Applka P7si�"F&'a1°"�'/•"°'a �#+Awmx.em� de vrw Pan wYl be Yw4we � �tl Yr.U0e sweA v bww wpm w M Do DMdM And ft paNw0. /ar n avahetlntly COlrww a� AatlYYprlY FireV CBWWAvin �. )�'+R elae.ea, prYp e0wlq.e� r rtll r par / ArPia.aD'ellpeR . n1mIYhsvcArsieLAe0r MWntlerrelwolneSpv�llKNinc nxnlaaYerlerrr.s A*.& .el Ia101 rltltln tle •PneE PNr •WI e[ rtAxYd b m[ aoR Cetlkd plrainp W ee.I.e. wft. i. RM brirq ' p�Ivi byluerd b ROAR t fi 0[ M" Apo= • W6 Rol - ud ft*cl App W 4 Pill) Phvr&4 D>rdrlbl pmj{ . r •etl he bei►d n0. r. b Yp[i .dj W dy W p , M)ml PaKe1 oven b vs. W dWa rE pAvary. •upd�naenrhnh oo..p.Ytlentlh leapperree Wreliee- neb and wen EWpr Yrrr.hNn h Spalnc Pr aw. •71e nuhaw nwnee W eablorMdt., se r.eKe. the type, �tl tec plaarea W W ntaia.11�� nahaes W W Ee MnrW d b .cmdet¢r4h CMy.1.11 JeYr rwe&NOW p[o lk lwe M, 7. Vk-.. ldlertlr "bedevdope0 lnrm.Era whhC7ry warbp rre aeWeaq�Wee.Ye -MVY. �r Ph*,Appikan P"1h'Av I r "N0°AW�. h'y' l' ITIpaRbh1'/- 1)tlu0hwedratlNAelntlnerhi�ypopire �� �� vkrleA Poenbi niteia FA" - Nash Mb6.ein Mn1u.lM Pl O - Fapc 22 ETIWANDA NORTH SPFCIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE: MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE U i AITICANDCL.,'1RAMON afR.rAO�+� r O(Uxff agn I . .fftpms andimpl�mloe hffw mnLdm of ftmoh papaw Oleof dlckry raofnofd.plvpm, Y,m,mpmadfe RIi'J atw developmrm Y NAm. p.m W do df YA as spi SpreR of rlfhlence b OKQd imoywuum Ipwai. TGe p.md.t Yhi1►! Yl Yya RmYd � Kw dc.empmmiL,am,m dt Ylt 6mp a. . "be.fff w "p.war.a,ry a. mlppKd. NOpC. dN'l.am'rmfrm ft p cadlia,J.ar ifm.o.maoWd apNC.emambN.r{m d. nerd b a rglo.saml wcaRms Rw a Wp� ft T wwk..W.Clml pm a, de CRr1 ftu pop. dwO W.- ent lapnwuv, p.a1 m rdw. d &mkp. tppbcml=. pmNtmt aR dj-- dmR bmbavl wnee&i Ilhd.*b dle Jn <mfnmt In RneN. hbW mlW,�aom imp.o.emef wm b a Arrimy ft ... Cs IEe mam m m bt mr WAfurlaYpm}ct a.wYUd 6 W,cr hrtlapsem .eem iEe iOemiM1N rpR.sml peJaa b WprOeaappx roi.c 4a am me b Ram fa W t. Me MReia�m Y mtlt q.M •.ulW b. TACpapam albs b nimNUae,aemapsmmm b ueweoeme ooewin uvePo, I.pwmfa arc V•+t+dlao mt.ear re. I2 TAeCYY- Niful. appvdmmasbpiiw,oL, NalflrrsMU4 W.J. Applo P+O.Crm avf fleWm P"=Ap .L Paul .TH 4."a/lrtDm Toel mkp[b me—•_• Cmmil" PMJM b tl. pagm, poJ•aa aN ,rm.iud . Talk x.45, d raa.pa' J h plfpf.d P-*M gayest Appir pnlrmlK am pmbm/ pialeGl Ap .LPatll armmtmd mTadee 14 -5. t,R far5 porsaN vE1Gt rode ft CmmlmiaR g000 r.nmrmN of Ch A t.eJWt . BW1arY Rw a Dry Cm:, SftknnyBtc L. mad. AR W. impmfed bofmim. ue.alve • ¢au Caa,dEWion t��w.Wa N m MW,. ma ..n, P.,.- 11... 21 C Q roz m A N ID W W m o+ C z° m N rn ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONS ®LE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE Il rc.aa.r a.n fl�('In!fH1N le��.� . 27waipmemof Cee.bnimo(EMAlmza dcUDWP CVf pto ft Bye M. YcoePOmer bw PNSP, sally —.i mar be a0re0 o mr ab row. rWw, , nkc Cbmi W Oq S*ku bcr. 1991 dw.ae.. neaipamaorgeeaen,lmoraf BOaerare co cmn me LA w9hy owdit may be a*mW prwml m a mnaderaem of aammtlro.Ilpmeinpbrb �pgra orYcM - uanmpcquirhgoonmu[.d Naf Oetl BaakvrE fabai� Fuvw. NoM scene an FJirmda Noah Mkiaauan MgworirK 1�aP.n -PW 24 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORIN(; PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE DATE f.f Aa MIS•!• -•' SNORT -TUN (CONSI" ucni3N) PAwS810NS i Cacwna v a ppWw xnbr c gmdm "iL Inc ipplicat NeJea Appikx RMn{ RIO Emo-dq PMbr in iwnts of 3r�in{ f<mel ( t ..ar". a*klw Ines weawas AW be bmMPNOW N madtleaapadnRperMMJl�pmrA SCAQMD RNef03 R94o We MpUwcduabem+sokkall{sollaft pMVnapOolsich"tlw mMratln.loTle WRc I b"Wdtbef@R uncial aWmana, btd*ti AQMVR.* aaa0m a aswRpmimR RAP. ftw ana ina,acia m.aAa m offna.3ypRJ�ml�saYtuYJb{' Mhiry .aanR(wnhMsaMWatnca.+aalLmibY and mil hb0er MMeR Rabe) • snpPnativMa :Mwn.ta.kRfJUtntpaioNalMldM M.bVArr •wgIXl..ehMp aa.sam w+Paae •Rereftdnp peed aea Isedialy AReP wil 0lmubsom LOW-TRAM E WIOHS 2. baagRm win SCAQMD's Rcpldm %V. one Rp0- PMgea AWBcia P6.w Eno-aim d Ha fobb 5. Peo)as a lftft eloJaea"afbiieuwpnatleanalpml Pymlry camiab rppo.YbreechaighbIX- Mabdaelm MAA) n coanefn a i inpfaml r pntpmulm anal (WID yporfl a arRarnpnR�brzd aallo+e+Wde alp, Vd*ko p E33P iMnetlowaesfagfIXJde' enpbrecaimi V- •aOmW- Y1a1nICMi1CYt<.apnlerdapenabihaIXYle.alGea- rpamnim, floe b b ILG ca didDoeA prim in pro)= y .L can PmJea 3, Pnr)ea Appbkaa PLwalm Pefornpipinnippnnfl, nva. pR kilo." brlWhf >R MesemivaMed: efdspnnja. •low<mtmj srieems s It usd wre ifeaibe. Ed."$N MWIW. Mvilenoy 1'm6rfm -Flg 25 j I roz Sao N A W O u i N O N ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM _ -- MMGA77ON IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIRLE FOR MONITORING TIMING COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE DAIS ♦nn u1lU �NRFRtlIYeelYCpfef PYMaIIRftlI bRYURIObISY MnCM pvWNe. *Sdh Used PAW dMW be osed Wtls ma mm felb <IMCIpCS' b IIIIIIIrt119C adYCt CilYlell 1. Applks fm &"kpbml M "t NM MiMY beatrd -NW A RDanis mnpaable pbpeas bb fe pcojea Issn b Nd)ea AMk" phffAq ed pbrb date. a- A{pillm Wde.4wa Mm .MOMNkb bpvrlle PN wkd -Ride fadbdn M ft spMPk pie aRJ b Q1CO.aR P"M Appgca. fbaelYi bbd Miicmwiim pb RM Apfbval. pmJRl RaidRXf b (p1p Clpeeb R WIR ealf-0tt14eK] epdea �� 1ppwY of trarN. �� 5 Rkr b lUe bnaee MbWMir4 le brmr wasefdd n a . d-Rk aplks d" pwlde evl . dspsee- PmjR Appfis !left, �, SONO Pebb �%� A{poral. I'S 0--Ofa oe MN AN SCAQMD Rpdsdoe, bslbblp RefW, Cu All Qolbp Mee flee Cede �d no)= 6m %m. W. SwR Revko. nwIk't Flnfnf C6eeYfe tte re00- W.Ih+de.es.eeuW< ff d.<b.docMf w dim mbalose W lepam a ft pbpoed NoM filwassda devedep nms due fe eb ed w mf=.Mbf opve5ee: 6. Rddewal fu I - se be omeossrled ar*d* Norm of k op.w" M de d, Q Sad bd Qm+ I PA` b uder b PmJW AppH= NAIL . and P1brb!flat Appwd. deeae de poslUfHfn 05 ales¢ del ea odor InpRa a Raft CSO.� isoJ � aCeINR RRpbP. bete Me 7 It nifty nkiwuk easbm momaide araddfa, a nlHpebo b mWmd. d Rgedlep pManzinp Mlea<, de above sued olpsNiRU<o mldpem m<asums n<apfiuhk. U. . N Midpee m niw* P v ,— - Pape M ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM_ MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE u AIR nn- A�(m��� 9 paiwakf Pwl�'im �°:'Cer rvIW emlg/m fpm CamYl� N J pplob�ML i111w1p QIOffLY4 ft atom aMd mmpnm nermo we aRfbEk. 10.71rl�"Smd= a wmcmm=dcEnm/rsmA MJWAWkM PMwd.&Omip ft is and Prbrn M)J App .). ow: Pw.�gcmmlmd. mN P.)w 'Eww dlkiell �mgMNoNb/ r)xmr rd appl W ae ahll h op0'm muktow Wow and bawjO. � "0 ..popm I" E ammdkd a Ow r mcmpM I vsem ksobic •Wb a pm W, gtaW wkWp rAU kwAmi 4 and tkL aeg RT6laY,1 am4o6aEW Eo mM. &iwm lNm MWSp MoNbM(Pmge Page 21 N O ID A lJ V� N lJ M T V M V ♦� ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMPKTOR REPONSIBLE P'OR TIMa1G COMPLIANCE MON"Us SIGNATURE DATE i.lo ypy� SHORT -TERM CONMUCISON NOSE I. ConsneUn aU+Mn"be Boiled bun 6:30 u. an 6W N. Pyojea Applicant MM-66 (OD& &Nwora) expine dedq meus- Mondly dnowo sundry and full m be pnsNb6 on Sean" or can @deal batldnyl. ] Caemebon NOIPwIe and ne3, fe0 be IwBled In nnordeee MlAmnufaNer'cyaiflodam Nolen Agplicial "wdtmd (L11do 91hmcmed) nR OA r4 nR - sin LONG-TERM TRAMC NOSE Qm6tA6R 1 ltnlneernfb WBbe mlolenyN bcky Ydirdla6dr r0✓els, NeJed Applicant PI and Plbr b Nnf Oom"mc, e W-A bona Wfl dnl maid eReclively block he UnaW d* pin as CYOdndn en01'VIo- bmwecn 6nvd Icvel IasPln r levee Wndnd ofdsm Ndin be yalBCd theme bun Iledwq oededble IIOrR de RltloehlR mWn�la6M+nl tlnB be IeplemvRed, ISO yceL rWl nlde •Wilbn Av Ilan WeddulBNe'Road bS,,s shm Ronal, •WWnn BN Ran.lho(WWMAlenle.112Re6ae/de 'Rocbem Avenge Inn Vine ROW b Bepel Alma, 86 Ra4 nest side EdfbR MAW'saMlee Recegwc 4. A ad beds nn0 dvl now clyect" flock he mm ouddd belnebie POnl-kedlmgbrfeaWrylefdeaetnWR16 /R1 M� lsiorb FbY OaRpney, olMebndngmeeMneofdelotlfrdhNpbmkdomecJe PIaamil O'vlda am W0JW OdcoPRO}rierAv bHnaen Vfmw ROW and BelyolAlnoe. Ned Nn1a.SeeMIR Raeelane f Anna tinter nN dot nwld erteairely riot ee Ik Wa6bl hmn it de awn no Emuw ltvci mcepm n any "Woad ro1a- PIbJln ApPllud Rer ft.046mlry etl Nbrb Fbel OwopeaT, NenIY1(lbnmiWOn fldl plo)nl Ri.v>bl NOnb MI116eYw Mwbnind NORrw - PW 26 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM mrnGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONS ®LE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE 11 OMORING SIGNATURE DATE __ —_- au 21SL56ltifWRRRI semti.c icepdbuegaaden ivled�a Nadlaoq aelRlfotla b.sihd filarsh4 aalul4e Ym{14e61WwY{maa- be lkka ny spaeala nil -Bryn S¢I fim MWbm Avers b Bnrte A. n fed •Bry.e Smebaoe a «»,r. A.d.. n o.r cka ewk- ..a 99 rm •Wib. A.ma fem MWitm A.uac b n.y Clod Boric d 130 fm •Wi mA.aae f1® Euvada A.eae b Pal A.eac. 140 fed • W l� A.eo9a f1m Em Aare r Warn BJbd ftW. 109 fm • WBm A.vre fm 9r Saws Rod b plym Clad Ra.d. IA fm •MWb A.aaa: fba Rnyn A.edae b WV= A. . 192 fax 'W*l Av far Wiim Amax b MM of Wim A. . 131 fm •Roehl RoM bm Vka; RoW b BMW Arms,M /m • My pack 9atlevad fem V Wa RuC b Bar A.era. mfm •fhy pad BaJwad km Baryr A.eae b WibM A, 292 Falwada fi491A mw,om M .s pm,. pr 29 CL_ o W• b A W WD A W Z M b a _ ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MMGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPOMIBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MOMMIYG SIGNATURE DATE 4.10 hQ=wwdmwQ -Day Cldi Boulmod Dar WWm Ae bMl!N WWm Aa Wfee •Fi)�wda A•es nwwtof Wieen A�vK,43 am 'Paw A� toeA of WWmAe ,S/feet •Wadem Baiod Ratl nmhaf 9101pt Mme, i t2 kee 'SteRwe30Ban MW"Mmeto EBwmftA a . m fee 6. taaMkkmWteamadWKrW2811 IN 1, I'm MOmC Rojm A M006%R aM Pelm b Pmjen APPWAL S CEoea neJsiol •atltaRm faadtr at KaoeRUiYr qwm) AaeeYt/Cl>WW mR atoll be,ori0[d foripmpoad thelaRMtelda�MYRC PPjee w.dAd Cbuloe 0v ft Co- 8, ce le be a1mR f e RROeK �naePed. Ad"weaedluka dl be PrdwM Fwftn W.bs per Owpte 12. SMIm I205 of IBC IMN- BnBiR CD& (UBC)Mr11e Wawareto rbft art CIOee7feetQilYb a[Nnedle R.'QdRE merwbA• 13n aea BwlnW for SR.30 W WIBm A� 210W 'Sege Rare300m A1R' MmeeoPflewda A�213 fee 7 AP �,Wd,,,lq lm Me -NMWW b�amwn. kxb m -Wm Moo aarreeA A bdfi q aitla K yedfk Pf er h be HajM AWNerm�t nmw.F m Maaey el Pfau C PdW W Ptajeu Aipaea4 aortl al WMW atsitr tle oawEYwd leper of 0 amR led aw*wm em P Pajeae3eWKRa•eflelb theM breel BeegemmCky'a MAedee tote tdeAa r appmpdK. Medrwol rdtllNm m M wired laeettef a Wmkv qw{ b adicx we eWd wNAOerOinJoor MIeC ndunMn. Mw H MWKt MwiwfntF o, -Pie M ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONS ®LE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE y au 1>�LAI�1 Lonc -IVaw ntolsnnAL Vase daiWYM h0ad W mlp�vel s•YYgrtivYktN�mdN IocoR �ineL.m Wdwlo•b�eydliel LONG -FYI M crR NOLSIS RedWdy aaarimY rcn! Elo.ad, m �ItlpUm b mpiel G ao w• m a w� Fiir� NoM MYldrlon Munfmdry Paden - Pye l A w m �r 0 Z a ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPL.EMBNIOR REPONS ®LE FOR .I.IMpG COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE 4.11 4.61.1 /OUCE rmonc om I Ibdn trretim PoaadbR Ile dry d pmme F{ fIX rn a(Iltrm p ap CY) Cft rL FdIX b Amftxxkq ede pobcemrrlmdaow0 b Yea(pYpmducegYlbdetmYlbr AImzd�m afor®eabde miry Ifdr mx.apmdealopYmbtlrs6bd minmryIXYed. z If dr dameWOeW fmdY�6mrnttbied bdrfN,. gdktm AoJee App @a cmra Nbrb A6o61bw,YrA fIXdeabprma SpmrW d" Jdb dr "[Oft CLrNII PtlY- Anantlel ties pgdp forpdks brim. The Sm 8, —d4 Cary Slmtll nePr6ne61 dM be mmied PNJe Av*u "OWN Yd Rtaert CLm- k Pd ro poke 6.pimemt w b deesbt h mad fa emu" mym ��k�App depMmpmmel rdepdpem,YwW YbObldabil6rbtlm m eppmprire crbm pate don mtYne. AfflummiWAOM M fctW"V arYbe m: nzmmmlef WftM, bn R M agairNb biddm: beatkd bpma. i. CYidYeEWhOoehslm bedrtl be' mpaeredbbde PNOMARA Id =dl W gbeb Omgr.� paledda safe' z. Adcq, teal Up)tbl � ekMy aMtW man YIIIe drtl be wojM AOPlle6d poet bbd BdYeab( NtrbOa�a) iaorpa wdr W� ft pm tea dedp b amdt Mb Cbf K dw& "-F 1 MM{tim Mmbdry Pmpmr - Pdbe 32 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONS ®LEFOR TIMING COMPLIANCE. MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE — clia I b bvekpaal dtlRaa.r. Acne pojai wpkae. t4W oompF PAka AFpk+ RanIIW EA0w.WF. RWb- P.br b P.Je App al. wke ILe Lien dkb or dw lddbm Fhe d RWdbw Cahn. W W d SdaF. Radb eat P.J} QpieaAe a YbabadRefLedla.imbwwa4bpaoaaa dft Q...w F9.e ROeNm QIF Of RwhD il.w_r, Y[YOM d m U. ado mdab Dlekt and nxmft Cm W Doe lopcaQtlYS¢.Aplk�leNYbe.IPktAamb Airlf wm dm add.. d de sm Ramr&o cry Code'. -mm Sam o Y "cPiteaee. d be dry•..aWdY widla.WWr . 2 Appksa f> iveJaPCm d W is i ieb Ike PDOM W Fto)M Appio.a Remo C .. woop Ra Pmjm Appa„Y emeeadadm a*AWW P de EN I lio.N Fke PIRRadm Pcvaam DwR dPit }L.dF. dWemm"m J AfpR�bdrmbop iY pwdclgwMftoY4.CO Aajea AWRY. Rl tl Q Nle F. Appa.Y YIFF.tlYUa Db.kfbAaYWeapiitlm.dmilCbdd p taRlm DmftA d Plat aebd be .KY RR nnk4 w NW a pwb{OpmOm d4CWAANlm d rfmrlQ. • Pda blaWve paa ypwY. beat paNCa.mdcae.dWma- Palm AppjU Rauh Q.memp FOe FmOd AM-" prat. tletpedRClbe .Ata.�avRpa.domYypo.Ydm me PeeafdmDbolad Aat Raman CKS mp Plo.wim PiR Ube CLCaiwm 5. A. Pmod Appkad Rmdlo O.aamp RC F.uja AppwY iyiamdm d de be owmg a bliYry bkW bap� F vatlm NOW d Fla . da.8b4� TLC.km.Mlm0 MACOacYm bW6ebeadroepRLb bft RamanQocolaFkeP m dm Dbmia d b. daf 6 1 RAVdto C..MW P.Iwdm Dfa.kt tA.Y rmlY veldt be PwJm AX6 Rmo Qoemp Re FoUW*R Sp al d Qryd S. eeteaYm d l c.Rfod. Oepea.ald Romany Pmatm D4MU d Rat prim b ame.nlon 0cclw a woudwA an plowcam mvks. 04 Coeakam Fitwd.HaCN MYldtim Mu.,miy Pm61{m -P.gC 31 RI O N � w w mw n rtl n W ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM _ MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSDILF. FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE I 'fl+eedmamrldm6admeNNdlod deobeilmlparoled Pmkd AWdnr PIml MwW4C�W Prbr b PMJd Apparel. kbMeprapeedrpdfptw .6.1O.fMeepro}d WpUU mrl,Bdwrdr Sdd DwAd edpofm oksl Dowell wkh de Fdwrdr Sdd Dhbi 1 rd OWM7ldd td CloDed Sdod Dwbi d lldm INN Sdrd (NMO a dseeie Ile IorrM. nm0. rm .Ile plrM{lpr seoondsdim flnwdrofldo,Wf, fdNdeplwlh Udad mftvpditp dwAbmdwlbderdopmd plbfm dBCftlop MrplrmgmrBRddYedbdepNSYIP plrl /or de dewJOpeml. 2. ThcmofAB2926rfodfd drdbehposdbePnhrirpesd Pmjel Appllml r- Al,PWift� PderWPWJWAWl d. .1mW dbdf. AB29Mpmvbu•M i..fsl.mpfspr mm.0lwrlde Sdod w bkt a mpoJd fadmlddemid lyd rdfB Mpngere laamYtlrlmm rd cad OWW7 Sdrel Dwwia amnMW PMr=b h Ml=W far dbd mbvdM I BMme PllwrdlSdod DlrlW rdde QdfePbYllihimlHiB AojM ApObk Pss* RmlgCw=W PdW b PbJm AppoM, Sdd Dlmd1 pedkl dal h flwlb oak ndimle b dm by ss4 Bdesdo Sdod DWIC emA pofd AB2926 wa W fe imdeWw b 6mty rb the eUdwW NW. =6 oaft Shcoel momma do II y b R puim'Penlfd idCIY. lldl RRe9t doafeil" 6e fsdad b, de nhhYrbm a e hldlaRl Caersdry Fdtldn DWdn whhln de Edwllldd Nss SpedBc Pen re fmbmh dod dlodm. 4.11.4 WA11M SUPPLY i Mersabrisrlre aderdeldplm- d ft, Wdlk h*a Appb= Pi -^4 and Mw b PM)m AWWd. plm. aw kdode: MUM COrWlm emd FVJM •We of Wnwbirp N rq-Wim wide siirY carer MWA.- erma •hrlmhtlrl of Bow owed derkp m hods rd sower Ileedr. w- BemlMN utr. OUK oflmo • of IrrldNim frrcmr, (.wrhlNe MN de t f ufe odie dry'ewbupe odivice Fbi ca r Notth Mkfpllm hlrsMill( For - P V M ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM_ MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE IIIA XAlKLsLwnjuammKvm 2. PniaApo'vA Rfa+eaBSdoeaaa. fib0 ROOM mpfora. b t Plaei & .6 =+wilts W r htftn C-mm" AMT Wn pts pojon i/ ofnepoP�POje<i'lieQ'1VP�iis�gNa MWk: ad Fhmobq CLrlt Wmmdfm Cad aFMWloWhiWMr aWliar aoa datpenl6Wb- I 7U OCW wW cart m aaaC tOeoatoa WDPDJMakwF Aupn ApOkM pww"atYtenif/. Rlorb pe)ai wp aL opabary oRt bait' s.MAapll srx bra co-amp Caay Wt efl pf*a OerelgrabbttlK DlafaalRpti�tbaab Wa {_ AppbU k. I h0b.Wm ofw ft CC Pmjm Apbb RmftmdnlrYa�, PAN b Pojea Appfwd. WDMaar Paa MMMARY.tw 01WRd WM7b mapc*lwywa cal pojea CM" CaM"D MWDtaietaRoaltlaydAaae Dwvktmd lslyCaw4 pojnaidopP. 7ieu.aydtstdsmt YibYatlildM m a0ndopat' Piaaa tYa ) Pmktt Appbl Raab Eftboob30 Pofee Apparel. nA CCWDapsa6CD. Paffyatchwfaeebaeprpaaelbdaa aaauro Ooay NAM POW be Pfo+lOd A m pkt IN i mpeei spnaiq Pace Chad DAWK C.Nomp i. pwvea4aWa•�IrYSaxaWbeaoMlaeaaYY Caa"Mar000kiclo afaiR. aae Mfdtbd wwow a od R m" oxm ala 6. No batp fmb b my be No" SO ft Poj=Appba L1Aaiaa- ado Pb 0 t Of pajaa lrefepeaeaaseareettalCalwoft Clyd ClaappRw PSM01v aW61V RnIY ■.aecer�orrea+rnaa..epa.ee.frr � pfeggr Jd fbaalpa+ll df4�acvaarwae4aoiplaeel 1. RfaYL 13%WMh Cft" W %PCOM Appod, eoapbiaaf�edaaaaaadaaimf faa.Ifagtlpipt aaY/AWWdptl Wa Da- em tpojta Cltaoep C."y Waa Daub. Oim 9W mWopl Waa OIC.R���ym Dw t"d Mampolm Warr Da i M*r Nona MtlfW Wnkanj fiop -PW 35 I w o m' ow O z �v m ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION VAPUMEN OR REPONSIBLE FOR TIMING COMMIANCE MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE .als Ede i 311c wIIV mlOr.b.s.&*WAdbJeYA.11l,tefle PIOJm Appel PIm11ip, Bep6myd Pr1er. Plofe. Appn.l. DF3R Yd be W.M.I. Ye a of ..s.r. n"ft o,..l.lm aK ao1 pe. gwldutlYd WPerpeYPC plma 2. RacYPofde rtq I R f dol Y:ra.MaMpd.. P.J..AppY.. Rmmbl&0 - aWC.ly WMWPAIJMAXWM. pm)wkft sa.im le.efodoffY.dryliAe.O•dipm NIIee01.11.10 Plain ed P°J°n Uf1Ae Wol fDede•flop.eelalCMD. ARNY brdmd- apse."O.r.Pam.for c httWYD. vLK 1. AppUk br dertlop. dM a peeper ) YID CCND. PMJ M AppYa CAfa.W om" NrR PdW W PNJM Awu W. CBMIYD. od M.D. wdxW pqN a cfao.Ymwapy Yr "wkLc wBmb M.., eIm PIDkC eam.enMOrIY Rf.r.vlR mR� CQ Md Cf1MMD. MMD.YPI I CA..Y- eb ww.Ye l.er16 MYpllm -D l F^ , PW 36 ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM _ MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSIBLE FOR ,LIMING COMPLIANCE; MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE alls ELACCIt1C SRRnCR 1 bacoew rats see aaimae0 aobna.br Irrcr NgiieA r miplROr a0asanirpatu,Me bans Ii�dAa0. 1. AB bal*w anrraard rilb lha'tft Pleareaidl mean P),cl Ap+taa Plaraiq. BaRibyr Safety Prim b PPJat Ap W. bSWClikbaiaOianMbrMliwab .itanraVtr • enilan rPamft Clydrfw each pplap 1. AR apPllars bated by WMH**Kbpaa rtlb theipaellla PMoclAPPRear Plaaft Swlear dYbmlA Prba b Project Apppri. 08%. iW EeaMa4MdM Y ammna rihia CaRbasa Bares Bwwfgold Sabp wA po}a A`rlmdWfaLl 7rl206C WZS.bl4rl.ANe!<4. rnalrb(Ca/rw I bf ia'R err�yp at P )M Apsaa Pbmkt. SarRer OWbrla Plbe b Pej=AWW 1. seta BOMDo bR ad Sday each proka lM1dwrMiiOVVIACatr.I�aPO' er�¢LIBG{�aRa rflrng cohmd0 111.7 NATURALGASSUVICt The b11 rearree rRlica" hakaL M mm ngisa s m e101iar a/co bWm bPe beat WriBd. 1. AR boUlap owanmba rliY tae Walk plan rGa aWl mce h*a Appahra Party, baftr Softy, Pls%efto)aAppwi. Whole Sllt tiraalaWYdla balk MW �� SOa�ell CASANk Oaa(b.. cob PC)" rPartycmmwwm z ARappl.mrrdbyWmiun lopeellW"ueapalec Pr*aAPplm P.w1aig.eWItmWSoly. Prim bPMJMApp 1. Pl=a "becam mas ratorianm rilar ORlasa SVmllh= Akvwb0WCa.. earlp gPccl Aiablanrhe Cole. TWA CAWir 2. SWXhWW 4. Aline i. rnmwm Oanrldw 3. qVikgovoit v kle �gPa}t App,,,,, Plaliy, BaYwy r r/iy, PNQ b P.Jaa Ap mel. C CwWmy I pmeranim Saslano CYYwW qa CO.. errAPro}a meta of" tan he hrapard bb mpedfic Plan ra&WVL r PLroby CLraridw ElfWrtll NoM Mfiariw Mmiwina P+aaram P., ll L d O N a A aD NW N _ ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION IMPLEMENTOR REPONSMLE FOR TIMING COMPLIANCE. MONITORING SIGNATURE DATE ..w SOODOASPR I. Mewbel b awwe arrle wpwbalbn 46111W agabp Ford M1Jetl AF*M rA 0111 Pl Q=- Rh Pbjm Appmed. CON11tl1a�. Un�reY. d �dow, 0 Walk � �Pam •Mwdmq of pick;rnab.. wxycIll vPWc1voIsbbpCllwaldrolld .1ell1Wspbps, 111.9 I.URARTSiRpTm 1. ihP'00appRCwa *an tprbbl hrl s a far drat k4 bw w . RPJMAmkM RUMORS ad Plbi\C-- PMJM AMMIA twh pomn. by de Oal", rvlr masaclm Of ft w RUl1D wilds Prof -e cY.Imp lim". •.II.IU T6S7ROME 1. IYmwwea�WJiry vn10 re IePer Han IYOayam. w+Nlwlp wu ee amipwlEk aip wmeiq pevelopraet 4-1611 CARLS bTRWES ! wtwwoa Rtnmy 4.12 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS I. Hd1 r4I obadaab mlabWm It Omrerad as le PlpJea Applkwl Rwwb, SS Rasro Repro APPSIL sd. Ipedk � row. TNisla br /evekpmm " nw1Py h Bn. ' RSIR 3111 pbjwx CawY9ISMRnsllsBe4m al Haft S, ,,tyn- D*L•r OMER. Py� ws drprap beurgwdMe brag aopa awpdwd rdlratlbeb aion dsl ap Me rb is .omd.m atm apdbaEb boaL ilia. r bld Im. 2. The R brpq, 9arlgwlWm, d dbpwY d wry Ilaslore RaJae ApPlrro PlalalYK'- aawalaY mate abaR Ee wSlJtla b bcY, uab, d LdeN a'{lF 9 /eJed APProraL eadr tbs, r maa olnrdh wfivillo chill le bme by pre hrdoam, An Pew pn'ebper.wlusiness. 1 NnAwer Rtifialm Of IorAliwn 1Or lme h-iol r rDe I pmry.R rile mall tr p Wd Pmjeo Appikaw PharNIA, RaraNg as- PM)m ApprmY. edr -- Alan pq¢y Pii�aiaa Hann npn:pabn Mwimra I Pm'. - Pisa M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner /CDBG Coordinator SUBJECT.: COMMUNITY DEVFLOPMENT BUCK GRANT APPLICATION - FISCAL YEhR 1992 -93 AND RELATED AMENDMENTS TO T^iE CH A$ - The adoption of the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant Application for Fiscal Year 1992 -93, based on a Grant of $551,000, and Related Amendments to the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy to Allow Funding of Public Service Activities. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: A. Receive for discussion and Public input the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for fiscal vear 1992 -93 and related amendments to the CHAS to allow funding of public service activities. R. Assess floodplain impact and consider alternatives to proposed projects located in the base floodplain. C. Direct staff to prepare a Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for future adoption by the City Council. AESTRACf Ir. accordance with HUD requirements, staff has prepared the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds (Preliminary statement:) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for fiscal year 1992 -93. TO accordance with the Citizen's Participation Plan adopted by the City Council for the CDBG Program, staff requested and considered suggestions from the public regarding the use of the CDBG funds. The Preliminary Statement provides staff's recommendations regarding the use of funds. The Preliminary Statement also includes numerous public policy element's and certifications which are required by law. CST'! COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG 1992 -93 /CHAS April 15, 1992 Page 2 r HUD regulations require the City to hold a public hearing regarding the Preliminary Statement and to take public input regarding the use of the funds. .Following the public hearing, staff will Incorporate public input and any additional City Council direction into a Final Statement which is to be presented to City Council for adoption at a later date. Additionally, in order to fund the proposed public service activities an amendment to the City's CHAS, which was adopted on December 4, 1991, Is required. The amendment will include revisions to the City's Five -Year Action Plan, the One -Year Strategy, and Table 4 /5a. Federal Law requires that citizens be provided with notice of the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendment to the CHAS. When the amendment is sent to HUD, it must include a summary of the comments received. The CDBG Prooram CDBG funds are provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to cities and counties based or, a formula which considers the comunity's population, extent of poverty, and the age of the housing stock. For fiscal year 1992 -93, Rancho Cucamonga will receive $551,000. Of the $551,000, $110,200 will be used for program administration; the remaining is available to support eligible activities. To be eligible for CDBG funding, activities must meet one or the two following criteria: A. Improve the living environments or employment: opportunities of lower - income persons, either by providing benefits directly to lower- income persons or by providing improvements to areas occupied primarily by lower- income persons. S. Prevent or eliminate community blight or blighting influences. in addition, the CDBG regulations provide that at Least 70 percent of all funds must be directed to activities meeting lower- income benefit. Of the activities proposed for fiscal year 92 -93, 92 percent provide lower- income benefit. The CHAS Amendment in order to be eligible I� receive federal funds, cities were required to prepare a Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). The CHAS is a comprehensive planning document which identifies overall housing needs for affordable and supportive housing and outlines a strategy to address those needs. The strate T/ includes development of a Five -Year Strategy and Goals and a One -Year Action Plan. As part of the One -Year Action Plan anticipated resources for investment were specified 145" CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CABS 1992 -93 /CHAS April 15, 1992 Page 3 r in Tables 4/5A of the Appendix. A substantial amendment to the CHAS is a major change to the strategy involving a change to the goals, objectives, or programs. This year, consideration is given toward expanding the Home Improvement Program and funding additional public service activities. The new public service activities recommended for funding provide immediate assistance to individuals in worst case situations, those who are homeless or near homeless. While expansion of the Home Improvement Program is necessary in order to address the tremendous waiting list for assistance. In addition, the intent is to begin providing more loans in order to assist those who need more major repairs and to begin generating future return income for the program. Therefore, staff recommends that the following activities be funded: ON -GOING PROGRAMS A. Administration $92,450 Support for the administration of the Community Development Block Grant, including activities to coordinate the implementation of the CDBG program with the City's other community development activities. This funding would be combined with $17,700 being reprogrammed from 1991 -92. B. Home improvement Program: $214,032 Continuation of the provision of grants, amortized loans and deferred loans to lower- income occupants of single family residences, including mobile homes, as an incentive to maintain and upgrade the existing affordable housing stock which otherwise might fall into disrepair due to the lack of resources of the owners. The amount proposed for the HIP program is a substantial increase, approximately 50 percent, over prior years. This was felt to be necessary due to the demands placed on the program in large part as a result of the national economic situation. There are approximately 50 people on the HIP waiting list, the majority of whom are requesting loans. It is estimated that approximately 5 grants and 9 loans will be funded. Remaining funds from 1991 -92 witi be reprogrammed for continued use in the Home Improvement Program. It :s estimated that approximately $112,329 will be carried over from the prior year. These funds have been earmarked to fund approximately 4 loans and 2 grants. Ll b CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG 1992 -93 /CHAS April 15, 1992 Page 4 C. Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements $147,129 Continuation of the multi -year program to design and construct street improvements, including construction of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks in the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. The following activities are proposed to be funded this year: 9th Street Waterline from Vinmar to Sierra Madre. This will include both design and construction. Ner_essary due to the recent vacation of the Chaffey Alley. Estimated costs are $36,860. 2. Vinmar Construction from 9th Street to Chaffev Alley. Estimated Costs are $110,269. Funds from prior years will be carried over to complete previously approved projects and to contribute any remaining toward completion of new projects. A chart indicating the number of remaining street projects and estimated completion dates is shown in Exhibit "B ". D. Sidewalk Grinding $5,940 Grinding down displaced sidewalks in areas located in lower income neighborhoods. This is a continuation of a program that was funded in 1991 -92. A substantial amount of the previously allocated funds will carry over, approximately $11,424. E. Wheelchair Ramps $6,936 Retrofitting existing curbs to accommodate the handicapped. Projects are located citywide. This is a continuation of a program funded in 1991 -92. A substantial amount of the previously allocated funds will carryover, approximately $11,410. F. Graffiti Removal $10,412 This is continuation of a multi -year program to eliminate graffiti from lowerimoderat_e income neighborhoods. Unused funds from previous years will be reprogrammed toward continuing the activity. Approximately $31,540 will be carried over. G. Fair Housing Counseling $8,476 The City is required by the CDBG program to provide this activity. Rancho Cucamonga contracts with Inland Mediation to provide public education, mediation, counseling, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. I'A1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG 1992 -93 /CHAS April 15, 1992 Page 5 r H. Landlord/Tenant Mediation $ 1,628 Continuation of the Inland Mediations Board's provision of mediation services for landlords and tenants to promote fair and lawful treatment by all parties in regards to disputes between landlords and tenants. NEW PEGJFCTE A. Oidtimers Foundation $5,000 This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing immediate service for emergency and small home repairs. The program will he available to low- income and senior households. Repairs would include such items as minor electrical, plumbing, and roof patches. Cost for material is limited to $100 per job with a maximum of two visas per household allowed in a year. Allowance will also be made for emergency repairs involving health and safety items. With City approval, a one -time grant of up to $200 will be allowed. B. Neighborhood Center $ 6,410 In fiscal year 1991 -92 a total of $67,777 had been originally allocated for use in providing handicap improvements to the center and for the design of new improvements. Since then it has been determined that significant rehabilitation work is needed including re- roofing, new flooring and exterior painting. As a result, on the original appropriation $32,000 will be used for handicap improvements and the remaining $35,777 will go toward rehabilitation of the structure. This money was originally allocated for the design phase of parking lot and park improvements west of the facility. An additional. $6,410 is required to complete these improvements. C. Fair Housing Testing $2,814 The purpose is to test alleged discrimination cases and to provide backup for federal and state enforcement departments. Inland Mediation would 'hire and train appropriate staff. Actual testing would then be conducted. This provides a complement to the City's Fair Housing Program. D. (louse of Ruth $2,000 Provides shelter, programs, opportunity, and education for battered women and their children who are risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24 -hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24 -hour crisis intervention hotline, 24 -hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, children's programs, legal and �4(� CITY C0UNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG 1992 -93 /CHAS April 15, 1992 Page 6 social advocacy, as prevention programs. than their initial Program that was reprogrammed. E, Homeless Outreach well as commutity education and violence The amount recommended for funding is less request cf 56,317. From the Senior Shared discontinued last year, $2,561 has been $10,000 A nop- profit organization that runs a drop -in center and referral Program to assist persons who are or are at -risk of becoming homeless. A variety of services are provided by the center including, but not limited to, such things as clothing, personal grooming, identification acquisition, shelter vouchers or referrals, bus tokens, drug and alcohol, education, literacy classes, food and nutrition classes, and vocational and job readiness_ classes. The center is located in Ontario. While their application suggested the possibility of developing a drop -in center at the Neiahborhood Center, space is at such a premium that it would not be feasible at that site. As a result, funding would be provided for the existing center. The Homeless Outreach is the only eligible operating homeless service organization in the immediate area to provide services to Rancho Cucamonga residents. In the previous year Homeless Outreach assisted 23 low income residents and 35 homeless individuals from Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, some form of referral assistance was provided to approximately 196 homeless individuals by the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood renter. It is clear that this problem is of increasing significance, especially in these hard economic times. The amount recommended for funding is .less than their initial request of $20,000. F. Contingency $31,770 This amount is being held in order to cover any potential significant cost overruns or may be reprogrammed into the proposed job center pilot program. There are a number of issues that need to be resolved prior to obtaining a final determination about this program. The purpose of the lob center would be to serve as a primary location for temporary job placement allowing the immediate connection of people with jobs on a day -to -day basis. In addition to facilitating employment opportunities, other services offered by the center could include referral to other agencies as well as training opportunities. The intent is to reserve the funds for this activity on the basis that it will be feasible. However, if by January should it be detr_rmined that it is not possible to go forward with this program, an amendment to the Final Statement would be prepared for City Council's action in order to reprogram the funds. �41 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDHG 1992- 93 /CIIAS April 15, 1992 Page 7 Program Income The CDBG Program receives income from repayment of deferred loans made from participants of the Some Improvement Program. Funds rereived will continue to be used to provide housing rehabilitation for lower- income single family homeowners. The amount is an approximation of what might be received. Income received will not be known until the end of the fiscal year on June 30, 1992. Estimated Amount.: $10,241 Amendment to the CHAS In order to fu nd the activities re ].ated to providing assistance to the homeless or special services including the House of Ruth and Homeless Outreach, the City is required to amend its CHAS to indicate these funding activities and the proposed funding amounts. Exhibits "E" through "F" contain the revisions to the CHAS. Alternatives to Floodplain Impacts Staff has provided, along with the Preliminary Statement, an analysis of the potential impacts of the above - described activities on designated floodplain zones. HOD regulations require that the City Council consider alternatives. Staff's recommendations for alternatives and mitigation measures are presented in the Preliminary Statement. W CLOSION In summary, staff recommends the following activities be funded through the City's 1992-93 CDHG Program: Proms Carry Over FY 1992 -93 Total (Estimated) (Estimated) Administration $ 17,750 $ 92,450 $110,200 SW Cucamonga Streets 199,616 147,130 346,745 Sidewalk Grinding 11,424 5,940 17,364 Wheel Chair Ramps 11,410 6,936 18,346 Home Improvement 112,329 214,032 326,361 Oldtimers Foundation -0- 5,000 5,000 Graffiti Removal 31,540 10,412 41,952 Fair Housing -0- 8,476 8,476 Landlord /Tenant -0- 7,628 7,628 Neighborhood Center 67,777 6,410 74,187 Fair Housing Testing -0- 2,814 2,814 House of Ruth 2,561 2,000 4,561 (from Sr. Shared) Homeless Outreach -0- 10,000 10,000 Contingency -0- _31,770 31,770 $551,000 $1,005,404 5 C) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG 1992-93/'CHAS April 15, 1992 Page 8 Respectfully submitted, Bra uller Cit Planner BB:Cd: a Attachments: Exhibit "A" - CDBG Funding Proposals Exhibit "B" - South West Cucamonga Streets Timeline Exhibit "C" - Public Service Goal Assessment Matrix Exhibit "D" - Preliminary Statement of Community Development objectives Exhibit "E" - Revisions to the CHAS One -Year Action Plan Exhibit "F" - Revisions to CHAS Table 4/5A Resolution Adopting the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives Resolution Approving Amendments to CHAS 151 CDBG FENDING PROPOSAL REQERSTS y PRDGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING The City is entitled to allocate up to 20 percent, or 5110,200, of the CDBG grant allocation to pay reasonable program administration costs and carrying charges related to the planning and execution of the CDBG program. Based upon the current program with staff's salaries and overhead costs, it is estimated that $110,200 will be required to cover administration costs and overhead. Funding Requested: $110,200 Eligibility: 570.206 National Objective: 570.208(d)(4) II PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS On -Going Projects A. Inland Mediation 1. Fair Housing - Counsels persons regarding their fair housing rights and mediates discrimination cases or refers them to HUD's Fair Housing Division or the State Department of Fair Employment for further investigation. This is a required program. Funding Requested: $8,476 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(U (B a D); Limited Clientele 2. Landlord/Tenant Housing Mediation - This program provides alternative conflict resolution for landlords and tenants through information and educational programs and by actively mediating cases when necessary. During fiscal year 1991 -92, a total of 421 persons received counseling information and 56 cases were mediated. Funding Requested: $7,628 Eligibility: 570.201(.) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(9 6 D); Limited Clientele B. City of Rancho Cucamonga Graffiti Removal Program Provides for the removal of graffiti from public and private property located in the CDBG target. areas. This program has received funding in two prior program years. Funds remaining from past years will be reallocated to this program in addition to requested new Sanding. There are funds remaining SfiP.T11'iTtiPr1'NXfi�t �s d4 QSR65am did not really get underway IT 7- EXHIBIT A CDEG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1592 Page 2 r Funding Requested: $10,412 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(b)(2); Slum and blight on a spot basis New Projects inland Mediation Fair Sousing Testing To test alleged discrimination cases. The purpose is to provide backup for federal and state enforcement departments. As part of this program, Inland Mediation will hire appropriate staff who will then receive training and education on appropriate methodology. Actual testing will then be conducted. The cost of the testing program is proposed to be split among several west end cities and the County of San Bernardino, including Ontario, Upland, San Bernardino, Pomona, Fontana, and Rancho Cucamonga. The requested proportional share of the cost for Rancho Cucamonga represents 5 percent of the m,prall cost of the program. Funding Requested: $2,814 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective.: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(D); Limited Clientele D. Inland Mediation Job Center Pilot Program The purpose of the job center would be to serve as a primary location for temporary job placement allowing the immediate connection of people with jobs on a day -to -day basis. In addition to facilitating employment opportunities, other services offered by the center could include referral to other agencies as well as in the dissemination of information and training opportunities to the workare. Funding Requested: $31,776 Eligibility: 570.201((e)(1) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A 6 D) Y -Teen Club for High Risk Youth - YWCA The YWCA west End proposes establishment of a Y -Teen Club for youth and youth -at -risk from low to moderate income families at the five junior high schools within Rancho Cucamonga. The junior high age is a period of transition often accompanied by risk taking, limit testing, and challenges to adult convention. The Club would offer after school activities for junior high girls aged 11 -14. Activities would include education, problem soloing, community service projects, fund �5 5 CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1992 Page 3 raising, and social events. The YWCA funds have come from general contributions, targeted ccsca m.ty organizations in the City, and a base grant from the United Way. The Y -Teen program 'cas received funding from Pomona's CDBG program for four years. Reimbursement would be based upon the percentage of low to moderate income households. Funding Requested: $29,645 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2);i)(C); Limited Clientele F. House of Ruth Provides shelter, programs, opportunity, and education for battered women and their children who are at risk of homelessness. In 1990, 221 victims of domestic violence received emergency safe shelter. Of these, 23 were from Rancho Cucamonga. Services provided by the House of Ruth include: 24 -Hour Emergency Sate Shelter for up to 30 days; 24 -Hour Crisis Intervention Hotline; 24 -Hour Emergency Transportation; Outreach offices in the cities of Pomona and Fontana for non - shelter victim and post shelter services; Children's Programs; Legal sad Social Advocacy; Community Education and Violence Prevention Program for school age children. All services are provided free of charge. A total of 750 women from Rancho Cucamonga received outreach for non - shelter services at the Pomona and Fontana offices, crisis intervention on the 24 -hour hotline, social and legal advocacy, and community education and prevention services. The House of Ruth currently receives CDBG funding from Ontario, Laverne, Montclair, and Pomona. Funds requested represent 1 percent of their operating budget. Funding Requested: $6,377 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.2C8(a)(2)(i)(A); Limited Clientele G. Project Sister Provides crisis assistance for adult and child survivors of sexual assault. feneral services offered include: 24 -hour hotline; personal accompaniment to the hospital, police station, and /or court proceedings; short -term counseling; rape survivors support group; Funding Requested: $5,000 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(1)(C); Limited Clientele 5 L' CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1992 Page 4 Rancho Cucamonga Family YSZA Child Care Services YMCA currently operates six fully licensed Child Care Centers within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These sites are located within three of the `.our school districts in the City and serve children attending twelve separate elementary schools. There are currently 267 children enrolled in the program with 43 receiving financial assistance. As a result of recent reductions in State funding, the amount of financial aid that can be provided to each family has been reduced. The YMCA suggests, in their proposal, that a partnership be formed between the YMCA and the City for the awarding of financial assistance to low and moderate income families. In 1992, a total of $66,000 has been budgeted for this purpose. The YMCA initially requested that the City finance half of that assistance. The City is currently not providing any other form of assistance to the YMCA. Funding Requested: $33,000 Eligibility: 570.201(.) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(C); Limited Clientele I. San Bernardino Child Advocacy Program Funding through this proposal would be used to recruit, screen, train, and supervise upstanding community volunteers to act as agents of the Court, Guardians ad Liten. The volunteers would be assigned to individual cases to represent the best interests of abused and neglected dependent children of the San Bernardino County Juvenile Court. The total grant request would allow for recruiting, training, and supervising fifteen new volunteers to serve an additional fifteen to twenty dependent children. Although the Child Advocacy Program does not have information regarding the number of children specifically from Rancho Cucamonga who were assisted, their records show that approximately 71 children from the Ontario/Upland/Montclair area were assisted. Funding Requested. $10,302 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A); Limited Clientele .Sickle Cell Organization of the Inland Counties Funds would allow the opportunity for a State Certified Educator /Counselor and Phlebotomist to conduct free sickle cell program services: education, testing /counseling (blood withdrawals) to low and moderate income residents. I 5 CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1992 Page 5 Descendants of Africa and Spain are statistically at -risk as carriers of an abnormal hemoglobin type (AS, AC) or are living with sickle cell disease (SC, SS, etc.) or a ^halasemia condition. They currently receive CDBG funding from Ontario. Funding Requested: $3,065 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(B); Limited Clientele K. The Another Way Fund The Another way Fund is considered a fund of last resort. It is available to respond to the urgent, non - recurring needs of eligible clients and /or their families when other resources are not available. Eligible clients are the developmentally disabled and their families. The CDBG money would be intended to be used solely for Rancho Cucamonga residents. Funding Requested: $11,940 Eliaibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(1)(C); Limited Clientele L. Adventure Mountain - Boy Scouts of America The program will bring boys from lower income families not presently involved in Scouting to experience a positive influence on their lives through an activity based program (archery, crafts, aquatics, etc.) combined with the use of the Scouting patrol method where youth car, take on leadership positions. The program would allow Rancho Cucamonga boys in the 5th and 6th grades a capping experience at the Holcomb Valley Scout Reservation.. The requested grant would allow 20 boys to participate. Funding Requested: $5,000 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National objective: 570.200(a)(2)(i)(B); Limited Clientele M. Makin it - Drop -Gut Prevention - Camp Fire, Mt, San Antonia Council The program is targeted to the Los Amigos and Cucamonga Elementary schools. It would involve the development and presentation of programs designed to keep students interested and challenged to stay in the classroom. These two schools are located in the block grant target areas. CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1992 Page 6 Funding Requested: $3,600 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(1)(ii); Area Benefit Gardner W. String Auditorium Restoration Requesting funds to assist with the interior restorat.ion of the Gardner Spring Auditorium. They receive assistance from Ontario for this as a capital improvement project. This project would not be eligible as it is not possible to determine the number of lower income Rancho Cucamonga residents who use the facility. Additionally, HUD encourages cities to fund local activities whenever possible. Funding Requested: $10,000 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: Does not qualify Homeless Outreach Would allow assistance and referrals to be provided for Rancho Cucamonga residents in need of a location within the community, The intent would also be to free up City staff's time already spent assisting these individuals. Staff has estimated that 196 homeless individuals were assisted out of the neighborhood center last year. Additionally, locating a satellite center in Rancho Cucamonga would serve to alleviate some of the pressure on the Outreach Center located in Ontario. However, should the drop-in center in Rancho Cucamonga not be feasible, they would request that funding be. provided for the outreach center located in Ontario. In prior years, Homeless Outreach has received funding from the City of Ontario. This year they are also requesting funding from China, Upland, and Rancho Cucamonga. Homeless Outreach is one of the primary service facilities in the west End providing assistance to the homeless. While they have been operating for a number of years, this is the first year they have requested CDBG assistance from Rancho Cucamonga. Funding Requested: $20,000 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A); Limited Clientele Children's Enrichment Center - The center would be available to children of homeless families receiving assistance at the Center. The Center will offer educational services, as well as medical and nutritional assistance. The Chaffey Community College di.strict will. be involved and the Center staff will X51 CDBG Fb27D'_NC REQUESTS April 15, 1992 Page 7 work closely with the Ontario - Montclair School District. The Enrichment Center is located in a 1,689 scuare foot house in Ontario. The house itself was made available from the City of Ontario. Funding Requested: $20,000 Eligibility: 570,201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A); Limited Clientele P. Preschool Services Department - Head Start The facility is located at 9324 Ban Bernardino Road, Rancho Cucamonga. It currently serves 76 low income preschool children at one time. The request for funds is to install computers in the existing modular units. The computers would be available to the children, aged 3 to 5, and to their parents as a learning opportunity. Funding Requested: $19,441 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(C); Limited Clientele Q. Operation Share - Cucamonga Christian Fellowship Cucamonga Christian Fellowship operates a clothing and food bank and provides referrals to other agencies. This is one homeless assistance agency that is located in Rancho Cucamonga at 9034 Archibald Avenue. Their future location will be at 9592 7th Street. The significant problem with this proposal is with the constitutional prohibition regarding the separation of church and state. Additionally, up to this time, the group has kept no formal records and they do not have articles of incorporation as a certified non - profit organization. In the futilre, if they incorporate as non - profit and are able to separate the food and clothing bank from the religious activities, they may be eligible for funding. Funding Requestea: $50,000 E"' gibility: Not Eligible National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A); Limited Clientele R. Arise Academy Funding would be used to provide scholarships to thirty-five lire income persons for training and development in the filed of the arts. Funding Requested: $15,500 Is r6 CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1992 Page 8 Eligibility: 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.20B(a)(2)(i)(5); Limited Clientele III. CAPPTA IP@PDV@ffiNT/POBLIC FACILITIRS PROJECTS On -Going A. City of Rancho Cucamonga Southwest Cucamonga Streets This is part of an on- going, long -term, multi- phased project. Work in the Southwest Cucamonga area began in 1988, after improvements in the Northtown area had been completed. To date, work on four streets in the northern portion of Southwest Cucamonga have been completed. Work on Sierra Madre between Arrow and 9th is in progress, and work on Sierra Madre from 9th to Chaffey is slated to begin in a few months. As shown in the attached exhibit., the remainder of the street projects to be completed are estimated to take approximately 7 years. Funding Requested: $201,500 Eligibility: 570.201(c) National Objective: 570.208(1)(ii); Area Benefit City of Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Improvements New Improvements This is part of an originally proposed multi- phased project. Phase I was funded in 1991 -92 to allow for the design and improvement of handicap access at the center and to fund design costs for future improvements. The remaining proposed phases would: (Phase II) provide additional lighted parking and drainage improvements; (Phase III) create an outdoor activity area and patio to include shelter, horseshoes, shuffleboard, handicap ramp and benches; and (Phase IV) provide an additional outdoor activity area with shelter, picnic tables and barbecue. The total estimated cast for this remaining work is $377,600. While the total cost estimated for Phase II is $187,762, it is possible to split this phase further: part A: Demolition and transplants, grading, drainage improvements and Alpine Street Improvements. Part B: Building improvements, perimeter wall, parking lot extension, and parking lot lighting. 1 S I CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1992 Page 9 IV. By splitting the work into phases, it is estimated that it would take at least four years to complete the work listed above. Funding Requested: Eligibility: National objective: 2. Rehabilitation: Phase II Total: $187,762 Part A only: $93,754 570.201(c) 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A); Limited Clientele This second submittal was a request to provide rehabilitation /reconstruction improvements to the neighborhood center. Items listed included reroofing, replacing the flooring, and painting the exterior. Funding Requested: $62,100 Eligibility: 570.201(c) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A); Limited Clientele C. Sidewalk Grinding - City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Grinding down of displaced sidewalks in areas located in lower income neighborhoods. This is a continuation of A Previously funded program. Funding Requested: $12,172 Eligibility: 570.201(c) National Objective: 570.208(a)(1)(ii) D. Wheelchair Ramps - City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Retrofitting existing curbs to accommodate the handicapped. Projects are located citywide. This is a continuation of a previously funded program. Funding Requested: $i8,243 Eligibility: 570.201(k) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A) DOW IMPIUYEMMT On -Going Projects A. Ci *,y of Rancho Cuca men 9a Nome Imp rn verve nt Program The City's Home Improvement Program 011P) is an on -going program which is designed to assist low- income homeowner maintain their properties. Maintenance of the existing is 0 CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS April 15, 1992 page 10 r housing stock is one of several ways of ensuring a continued stock of affordable housing within our community. The number of qualified applicants on the waiting list has risen to nearly 50 units, some of whom have been on the list since 1990. The program offers three approaches to assist homeowners: Grants of up to $5,000 for emergencies or minor repairs; deferred loans of up to $15,000; and subsidized leans up to $20,000. The primary focus over the last twe years has been on funding grants to low- income mobile home owners. However, the emphasis in the coming year will be to fund a greater number of loans thereby ensuring a future fund return to the program and that more significant repairs are completed. Assuming an average lean amount, it is estimated that up to 11 loans and 6 grants may be funded in fiscal year 1992 -93. Funding Requested: $250,000 Eligibility: 570.202 National Objective: 570.208(a)(3); Law /Moderate Housing New Projects Old Timers Foundation Home Maintenance and Repair Program This program would serve as a complement to the City's Home Improvement Program by providing immediate service for emergency and small home repairs. The program would be available to low- income and senior households. The types of repairs would include such things as unpluging drains, repairing faucets, air conditioning or heater repair, patching minor roof leaks, etc. The cost for materials is limited to $ 100 per job. Anything over $ 100 the homeowner must pay for. The number of repeat visits is limited to one per year, in that a household may only be assisted twice during the year. The Old Timers will be responsible to market the program and will also take referrals from the City's Home Improvement Program. Homeowners with extensive repair work needed will he referred to the HIP program. Funding Requested: $10,000 Eligibility: 570.202 National Objective: 570.208(a)(3); Low/Moderate Housing TOTAL REQUESTS MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY HUD Administration $ 110,200 $110,200 Public Service $ 303,770 $82,650 Capital Improvement S 481,777 No limit Home Improvement $ 260,000 No limit TOTAL $1,155,747 $551,000 I UD 9 118iHX3 W H Q H w W N Q y U U 0 F Z w W 2 w f a b b Z Z o � i O `o P 3 0 0 m m E U r m 2 a o 0 o m o 0 o 00 0 0 °o0 00 0 m o o O q V bo O oo 0 r m m m e m d i b m q G F — = Vq P q FF Ilf� rn Af: � m q _ o U o U :. a b b Z Z o � i O `o P 3 0 0 m m E U r m 2 Community Development Block Grant Public Service Request Evaluation V X W r� 5 U r Q j m a o 8. w a t m m a w c w g a a ¢ L ¢ t 3 u c m O o m u a AMOUNT REQUESTED 9 3 S 10 30 6 5 33 10 3 12 5 3 10 20 20 50 16 19 (In thousands- rounded) 132 NEED SERVED Essential Health 8 Safely ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ EduclPrevemlon ✓ ✓ we ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Culturalisocial ✓ ✓ ✓ PROGRAM New (to City) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ In9 ✓ ✓ ✓ TRACK RECORD ✓ V, be A Concem No Record 7 be ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ LOCATION OF SERVICE In Rancho Cucamonga r ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Other ✓ ✓ d ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ SERVICE TO RC RES. PrImary ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Proportional ELIGIBILITY I MoulaNniffluryl owl. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ we I ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ d ✓ Meats HUD mg. ✓ V ✓ ✓ ✓ Raises legal or other quest. ✓ CONSISTENT WITH CHAS Yes ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ NO ✓ r ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ V. r ✓✓ V X W r� 5 y PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE 1992 -93 COMMUNITY DE'JELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 1992 ' `1 EXH191T D TABLE OF C0NTENTS Page I. STANDARD APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ....................1 II. INTRODUCTION ..................... ..............................2 III. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ....... ..............................4 IV. STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ..................5 V. PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS ........... ..............................7 VI. POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO FLOODPLAINS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES . ............................... 16 VII. STATEMENTS OF POLICY ........... ............................... 19 A. Citizens' Participation Plan ............................ 19 B. Relocation Policy .. .......... ........................ 20 C. Residential Anti - Displacement Plan ...................... 21 D. Criteria for Substantial Change ......................... 22 VIII. CERTIFICATIONS ................. ............................... 24 � (v OP Figure No. page 1 Fioodpla'_n Boundary Map.. ....................... I...... I...... 18 1.WP I - STANDARD APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE .� VA- k', II - INTRODUCTION '1Me Preliminary Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds is the primary document intended to provide the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with an opportunity to review and comment upon the ways in which funds from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program are to be used to support neighborhood improvement activities throughout the City. This document establishes a comprehensive set of long -term goals and short -term strategies which will most effectively target these important resources to meet the community's needs. The Preliminary Statement is specifically designed to encourage participation by all residents of the City in 'identifying the community's housing, community development, and public service needs and in evaluating the strategies which are proposed to meet these needs. Upon approval by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City staff will incorporate the statement into the City's application for funding from the C.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the CDBG program for fiscal year 1992 -93. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM The CDBG program is funded by the federal government through the U.S. Department of HUD. The program provides federal funds directly to cities and counties for a variety of housing, community development, and public service activities. The amount of funds which may be received by each eligible City and County is determined by a mathematical formula which measures the community's population, the age of the housing stock, and extent of persons living in poverty. Each City and County decides for itself how the money can best be used to meet the unique needs of its residents. Within the guidelines established by the program, each City and County evaluates its own needs, then designs and operates activities to meet those needs. The primary goals of the CDBG program are to improve the living conditions and economic opportunities of lower income persons, to prevent and eliminate community blight and blighting influences, and to meet urgent needs for which no other resources can be found. A minimum of 70 percent of the benefits of the CDBG funded activities must be directed to activities which assist lower income persons either by providing benefits and services directly to lower income persons, or by improving neighborhoods which are occupied primarily by lower income persons. L2--n 'lL� THE CDB G APPLICATION Each year, communities wishing to receive CDBG funds must provide to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development an application, alona with an evaluation of the community's needs, long -term goals, short -term objectives, and proposed activities for the coming year. The appli cation also includes several statements of policy regarding how CDBG funds will be used to minimize displacement of residents, provide relocation benefits where necessary, and evaluate the need to receive additional community input amending its proposed activities. Finally, the application must also include a series of certifications by which the community agrees to meet the requirements of federal law in carrying out its CDBG funded activities. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THE CDBG APPLICATION PROCESS In preparing the CDBG application, each community is required to establish a citizen's Participation Plan that provides the public an opportunity to review and comment upon the proposed uses of CDBG funds. The Citizens' Participation Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is included in this document. In accordance with the Citizens' Participation Plan, the CDBG program staff solicited ideas for projects to receive CDBG funding during the upcoming year. Letters were sent to all community groups and agencies which have previously submitted suggestions, as well as to all City departments. An advertisement was published in the local paper inviting additional suggestions. The City Council will review the Preliminary Statement at a public hearing on April 15, 1992. If approved, the City Council will direct staff to prepare the Final Statement. A public hearing on the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds is a required part of the Citizens' Participation Plan.. Notices of the public hearing to be held on the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds will be published in the local paper. 1� l�� III - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN In order to integrate the projects and activities undertaken through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program with other housing and community development activities undertaken by the City and to coordinate long -term goals and short -term objectives, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts the following Community Development Plan. THE GENERAL PLAN The General Plan is the primary document establishing the goals and objectives of the housing and community development projects and activities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A!' projects and activities undertaken through the CDBG program are to be in compliance with the General Plan. In addition, the selecting projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG program, the City will first consider those projects which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan. COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), which is prepared each year for submission to the U.S. Department of HUD, is the primary document establishing the goals and objectives of the housing development, mortgage and rental assistance, and residential rehabilitation activities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 'Ahe five year CHAS was prepared in compliance with the Housing Element of the General ?Ian. In developing and revising the CHAS, on an annual basis, the City will first consider those projects which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the Housing Element. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIFIC PLANS The Specific Plans adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency are the primary documents establishing the goals and objectives of the Community Redevelopment Agency funded activities to prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In selecting projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG program in lower - income and Community Redevelopment Agency target areas, the City will first consider those projects which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the Specific Plans. 'chi - I �� •"ul.y •' t4��U. Y �h'1b J1id A•Y •:. Y:•,y ♦I: In order to establish long -term goals and objectives for the Community Development Block Grant (CD)3G) program, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby adopts the following statement of Community Development Objectives: COMMUMIT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES To revitalize and stabilize deteriorating neighborhoods, to prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences, and to eliminate conditions detrimental to the health, safety, and public welfare. 2. To upgrade the City's substandard rental and owner - occupied housing stock through various forms of financial assistance for residential rehabilitation. 3. To provide improvements to public areas and public facilities which make them more useful and attractive, including developing and improving parks and recreational facilities. 4. To fund public services which improve the quality of the living environment and complement physical development activities being conducted in the City. 5. To fund public services which improve the quality of life for lower income persons, including senior citizens, handicapped, and homeless persons. 6. To assist with the expansion of facilities and public services which improve the quality of life for senior citizens. 7. To provide incentives for the preservation of historic properties through the elimination of structural code deficiencies. B. To provide information and affirmative support toward the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home of their choice in a suitable living environment. 9. To provide the administrative capacity to implement the City's CDBG program, fair housing, and landlord /tenant mediation services, and to coordinate the research, planning, and implementation of General Plan and Housing Element revisions. -a- t-1 SPECIFIC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS In order to provide for the development of specific activities in support of the goals and objectives described above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby identifies the following specific needs to be met through the CDBG program: Financial assistance for owners of single family residences occupied by lower income households to encourage housing rehabilitation is needed to improve the quality of housing affordable to such persons and to prevent the deterioration of the housing stock which otherwise might result from a lack of resources for housing maintenance available to owners of housing affordable to such households. The provision of such assistance also contributes to the City's general efforts to promote housing quality standards and eliminate structural code deficiencies citywide. 2. The provision of incentives for the rehabilitation of historic properties and the elimination of structural deficiencies is needed to prevent and eliminate blight, blighting influences, and conditions detrimental to public health and safety. 3. The continuation of the City's ongoing efforts to design and construct street and sidewalks needed to improve the living environments and prevent the deterioration of the transportation infrastructure in low /moderate neighborhoods. 4. The provision of landlord /tenant mediation and fair housing services. 5. Provision of expanded recreational facilities serving low /moderate income areas and senior citizens. 6. Elimination of the blighting influence of graffiti from low /moderate income neighborhoods. 7. The provision of Public Service Activities to assist low /moderate income persons and those with special or urgent needs, including but not. exclusive to, such activities as assistance, to the homeless, job services and referrals, and battered womens shelter facilities. l � Z V - PRQTECTED USE OF PONDS ON -GOING PROGRAMS A. ADMINISTRATION Description: This program will provide for continuing the administration of the CDBG program, including activities to coordinate the implementation of the CDBG program with the City's other community development and planning activities. Location: This program would provide for the administration of the CDBG program citywide. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.206 of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: This program provides for benefits to the persons and neighborhoods to be served by the following programs. National Objective: 570.208(d)(4) Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Proposed Funding: $ 92,450 Carry Over (Estimated): $ 17,750 ':.tai: 5110,200 S. HOME IMPROVEMET PROGRAM Description: The continuation of the provision of grants, amortized loans, and deferred loans to lower income occupants of single family residences, including mobile homes, as an incentive to maintain or upgrade the existing affordable Lousing stock which otherwise might fall into disrepair. There are three proposed components to the Housing Rehabilitation Program: I. The Low - Interest Loan Program would provide amortized low - interest loans of up to $20,000 to owners of single - family residences occupied by lower, income persons. iW� D. E. Benefit: National Objective: Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: Carry Over (Estimated): Total: SIDEWALK GRINDING Description: This project involves the grinding of displaced sidewalks by trees. The project that will be undertaken is approximately Sno scattered sites. This project is eligible under Section 570.201(c) of the CDBG regulations. The sidewalks to be repaired are located in lower income areas. 570.208(a)(1)(ii) y The streets to be improved are located in an area where 51 percent or more of the residents are lower income. 570- .209(1)(ii) $147,130 $199,616 $346,745 Location: Eligibility: Benefit; National Objective: Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: Carry Over (Estimated): Total: WHEELCHAIR RAMPS Description: This project involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate handicapped persons. The project will be done in three phases over three years. This is the second phase. The project will be undertaken citywide. The project is eligible under Section 570.210(k). The project will benefit. the handicapped who are presumed by HUD to he low and moderate income persons. $ 5,940 $11,424 $17,364 Location: Eligibility: Benefit: 1J r National Ohjective: 570.208(a)(i)(a). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $ 6,936 Carry Over (Estimated) $11,410 Total: $18,346 .• GRAFFITI REMOVAL Description: This project involves the removal of graffiti from single - family residences and public properties. Location: The project will be implemented in the block grant target neighborhoods. Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: The project will eliminate blight causing influences from low /moderate income neighborhoods. National Objective: 570.208(h)(2). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $10,412 Carry Over (Estimated) $31,540 Total: $41,952 G. FAIR HOUSING Description: The City is required by CDBG regulations to provide this activity. Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the Inland Mediation Board to provide public education, mediation, counseling, and legal referral services to promote fait housing. Location: Services will be provided through the Inland Mediation Board, 420 North Lemon Avenue, Ontario, California 91764. Services will be available citywide. Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the COSG program. Nlth' 1 N Benefit: The project .:ill. service a limited . clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are low or moderate income persons. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)!i)(b 6 d). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: H. LANDLORD /TENANT MEOI,,TION $8,476 Description: This project will provide landlord /tenant dispute mediation services and provide information and referral to City residents. Location: services will be provided through the Inland Mediation Board, 420 North Lemon Avenue, Ontario, California 91764. Services will be available citywide. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG program. Benefit: This project will service a limited clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are low or moderate income persons. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(b 6 d). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $7,628 ex vnnnneua I. OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION Description: This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing immediate service for emergency and small home repairs. The program will be available to low income and senior households. Repairs would include such items ae minor electrical, plumbing, and roof patching. Cost for material is limited to $100 per job, with a maximum of two visits per household allowed in a year. Allowance will also be made for emergency repairs involving health and safety items. With City approval, a one -time grant of up to $200 will be allowed. l "l 1 Location: Services will be provided by the Oldtimers + Foundation, 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California. Services will be available citywide. ..legibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.202 of the CDBG program. Benefit: All grants will be used for the miner rehabilitation of residences occupied by lower income households. National Objective: 570.208(a)(3). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $51000 S. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER REHABILITATION Description: In addition to providing handicap improvements, which were approved in the prior year, significant rehabilitation to the structure is required. Rehabilitation work will include re- roofing, installing new flooring, and painting the exterior. Funds previously allocated for design of new improvements on the site will be re- allocated toward rehabilitation of the structure. Additional. funds from this Program year will be allocated to complete the improvements. Location: City of Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow Route. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(c). Benefit: The Center is located in a low income target area, CT21, BG3, though services are provided to eligible residents who live outside the target area. Primary users of the Center are senior citizens with numerous activities benefiting low income individuals and families. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(a) Limited clientele. Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $ 6,410 �1� Carry over (Estimated) $67,777 y Total: A. FAIR HOUSING TESTING $74,187 De S Cr iption: The purpose of this program is to test alleged discrimination cases and to provide back -up to Federal and State enforcement departments. Inland Mediation will hire and train appropriate staff. This provides a complement to the City's Fair Housing Program. Location: Services will be provided through the Inland Mediation Board, 420 North Lemon Avenue, Ontario, California 91764. The program will be implemented citywide. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(.) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: This project will serve a limited clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are low or moderate income persons. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(d). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $2,814 L. HOUSE OF RUTH Description: Provides shelter, programs, opportunity, and education for battered women and their children who are at -risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24 -hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24 -hour crisis intervention hotline, 24 -hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, children's programs, legal and social advocacy, as well as community education and violence prevention programs. Funds remaining from the Senior Shared program from the 1989 -90 and 1990 -91 fiscal years. Location: Services are provided by the House of Ruth, P.O. Box 457, Claremont, California 91711. Services are available on an as needed basis to Rancho Cucamonga residents. e4d- 119 M. it Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the MEG regulations. Benefit: The project will serve a limited clientele who are presumed to be low income due to the nature of their circumstance. National objective: 570.208(a)(2)(1)(a). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $2,000 Carry Over (Estimated) $2,561 Total: $4,561 HOMELESS OUTREACH Description: The project will provide assistance to persons who are or are at -risk of becoming homeless. A variety of services are provided including such things as clothing, personal grooming, identification acquisition, shelter vouchers or referrals, bus tokens, drug and alcohol education, literacy classes, food and nutrition classes, etc. Location: services will be provided through the Homeless Outreach and Referral Program, 122 S. Vine Street, Ontario, California 91762. Services will be available on an as needed basis to Rancho Cucamonga residents. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: This project will serve a limited clientele who are presumed to be low income by the nature of their situation. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(a). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $10,000 CONTINGENCY Description: This amount, which represents 5.7 percent of the grant amount, is being held in order to cover any potential cost overruns or it may be reprogrammed into the proposed job center 44A- 1610 pilot program. There are a significant number of issues that need to be resolved before final determination can be made regarding the pilot program although it is hoped that the matter will be resolved by June. Location: The funds could be available for use in any of the programs discussed above. Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Prcject Funding: I�t $31,770 VI - POPENTIAI. IKPACTS TO FLOODPLAINS AND PROPOSED MIITIGATION MEASURES y Under Federal Executive Order, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to protect floodplains and to reduce the risk of losses from floods by not conducting, supporting, or allowing activities to take place in floodplains unless the activities constitute the only practical alternatives to meeting community needs. Although most of the water courses in the City have been channeled to reduce flood hazards, there are some areas which are potentially subject to flooding in a 100 -year flood. As indicated or. the map attached as Figure 1, several of the proposed activities are to be undertaken in floodplain areas at -risk for a 100 -year flood. These activities are designed to alleviate the deterioration of public and private property already located in the floodplain. Therefore, these activities do not directly or indirectly support development within the floodplain. Staff of the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has assessed the long- and short -term risks of undertaking the activities within the floodplains and has assessed mitigation measures which may be included in the design of the activities. Public notice of the intention to undertake activities within the floodplain was published in the local newspaper to provide citizens the opportunity to comment upon the activities. Notices were also provided to interested public agencies. SOUTHWEST CUCAMONGA STREET IMPROVEMENTS In previous years, staff considered alternatives to providing public improvements in areas of Southwest Cucamonga located in identified flood hazard zones. All street improvements proposed for funding through the 1992 -93 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) have previously been reviewed and approved by the City Council. The Council has previously made a finding that the street improvement activities which are proposed for the 1992 -93 CDBG program are the most practical and desirable alternatives, and that adequate mitigation measures have been identified and designed into the projects. The design, location, and size of the projects have not changed subsequent to the finding; therefore, no new finding is required. HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION INCENTIVES The Council has also made a previous finding that the Home Improvement Program and Historic Preservation Incentives Program are the most practical and desirable alternatives and that adequate mitigation measures have been identified and designed into the projects. However, adding additional funding to these ongoing programs requires a new finding. (Although no new funding is proposed ,`'or Historic Preservation for the 1992 -93 fiscal year.) ��z. Staff considered alternatives to undertaking these activities in the floodplain areas and found them impractical and undesirable. one a alternative would he to exclude properties in these areas from the programs. This would leave residences in these areas which are occupied by lower income persons unprotected from the deterioration which may otherwise result from the deferred maintenance likely to occur where financial assistance for home improvements is unavailable. Excluding historic properties from the program would similarly fail to protect such properties. The other alternative, removing the structures from the floodplain, is clearly impractical. In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for structures which are to he rehabilitated under these programs, the City ray require that owners of properties located in flood hazard areas show evidence of federal flood insurance coverage before rehabilitation assistance is provided. FINDING In order to approve operating the House Rehabilitation Program and Historic Preservation Incentives Program within the floodplain the City Council must find that: It is necessary to undertake the activities in the floodplain in order to protect residences occupied by lower income persons and historic properties from the deterioration which may otherwise result from the deferred maintenance likely to occur where financial assistance for repairs and improvements is unavailable. Adequate measures designed to mitigate the risk of property loss which may result from undertaking the activities have been identified and included in the operation of the activities. The activities conform to applicable state and regional floodplain management standards. VII - STATEMENTS A. CITIZEN'S PARTICIPATION PLAN The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in the process of identifying projects for funding through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City will, in conducting the CDDG program, follow this Citizens' Participation Plan. Outreach. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages citizen participation; with a particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income and residents of neighborhoods which are experiencing physical deterioration. In order to reach as many residents and community groups as possible, letters will be sent to community organizations and individuals who have participated in the program or suggested projects in recent years. In addition, a display advertisement will be published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin at least one month prior to consideration of the preliminary statement. 2. Notice. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides citizens with advance notion of all meetings related to the CDBG program and makes copies of all related materials available for public review as soon as notice is given. Notice of the hearing on the Preliminary statement of Community Development Objectives will be published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper at least 10 days prior to the hearing. 3. Technical Assistance. The City will publish the names and telephone numbers of staff familiar with the CDBG program who are available to answer questions and help residents and community groups package a proposal. 4. Public Hearings. The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses public hearings to obtain citizens' views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the program. A hearing is held on the Preliminary Statement of Community Development objectives at which the City's housing and community development needs are reviewed, past policies and programs are discussed, and each proposed project is explained. A preliminary selection of objectives and programs is then made and published for public review and comment. The hearing on the final grant application is held a month later. All hearings are duly noticed. Agendas and staff reports are available in advance. The meetings are held at City Hall, which is fully accessible to the handicapped. k.19— Language Access. bility. Several neighborhoods have + substantial hispanic populations. At meetings where it is likely that the attendees will not be bilingual, the City will provide an interpreter to ensure that residents can understand and participate in the procedures. Responsiveness. Once projects have been funded and are under way, the city is committed to ensuring the satisfactory execution of each project. Staff provides a timely response to all written complaints, usually within 15 working days. B. RELOCATION POLICY Recent changes in the regulations governing the expenditure of CDBG funds require that the City establish a polity governing the Provision of relocation assistance to any family, individual, business, non - profit organization., or farm that results from implementation of its CDBG programs. It is the policy of the City to avoid displacement of all families, individuals, businesses, non - profit organization, or farms in carrying out its CDBG programs. No displacement is expected to result from the activities proposed for the 1992 -93 program year. However, in the event that operation of any of the CDBG funded activities results in the voluntary or involuntary displacement of any family, individual, business, non- profit organization, or farm (whether owner or renter), the City will provide relocation assistance in accordance with the standards and guidelines set forth in the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, Section 7250 (et seq.) of the State of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and the guidelines issued by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, as applicable. The City will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff and consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realters, social agencies, and civic organizations. It is the City's objective that all displaces be relocated with a minimum of hardship in accommodations which are decent, safe, sanitary, and suitable to their individual needs; located in areas not less desirable than their current location in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities; and reasonably accessible to their customers or places of employment and priced within their financial means. The City will handle those cases requiring relocation which result from implementation of CDBG activities cn an individual case -by- case manner. Services provided to eligible dispiacees shall include but not be limited to: Providing information on project activities, rights, benefits, and options open to them. �D� • Maintaining liaison hetgeen displacees and agencies of firms with resources to assist them (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, Small Business Administration, Office of Loca] Economic Development, lending institutions, realtors, etc.). • Locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the production of accommodations to meet the needs of all displacees. • Assisting displacees in obtaining financing. c Assisting displacees in securing priority consideration for rental assistance, public housing, or other housing assistance activities. o Making referrals to appropriate social, community, and welfare agencies. o Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinating all relocation activities. o Providing all families, individuals, businesses, institutions, and farms which are displaced by CDBG funded activities with written notice of this policy, the types of services available to them, and the amount of relocation assistance for which they may be eligible. (Payments will be in the amounts established by State and Federal Gul.delines.) City staff and consultants will be available to answer questions and provide information and, by their early involvement, to see that relocation proceeds with a minimum of hardship. C. RESIDENTIAL ANTI - DISPLACEMENT PLAN Section 104 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 requires each grantee to adopt, make public, and certify that it is following a residential anti - displacement plan providing one -for- one replacement units in cases where residential units are demolished as a consequence of an activity funded through the CDBG program. The plan must include steps that will be taken to minimize the displacement o.` persons from their homes resulting from any activity funded under the CDBG program. The plan must include steps that will be taken to minimize the displacement of persons from their homes resulting from any activity funded under the MSG program. It is not anticipated that any demolition of residential structures will occur as a result of any of the activities proposed to be undertaken during the 1992 -93 program year. However, in accordance with the Act, the City of Rancho Cucamonga establishes this Residential Anti - Displacement Plan. �S1— The City of Rancho Cucamonga will replace all occupied and vacant occupiable lower income dwelling units demolished or converted to a use ether than as lower income housing as a direct result of activities assisted with funds provided under ;he Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and as described in 24 CFR 570.6n6(b)(1). 2. All replacement housing will be provided within three years of the commencement of the demolition or rehabilitation relating to conversion. 3. Before obligating or expending funds that will directly result in such demolition or conversion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga w411 make public and submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development the following information in writing: a. A description of the proposed activity. b. The general location on a map and the approximate number of dwelling units by number of bedrooms that will be demolished or converted to a use other than as lower income housing as a direct result of the proposed activity. C. A time schedule for the commencement and completion of the demolition or conversion. d. The general location on a map and approximate number of dwelling units by number of bedrooms that will be provided as replacement dwelling units. e. The source of funding and a time schedule for the prevision of replacement dwelling units. f. The basis for concluding that each replacement dwelling unit will remain a lower income dwelling unit for at least ten years from the date of initial occupancy. 0. CRITERIA FOR SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE Federal regulations for the CDBG program require the City to notify affected citizens and provide them the opportunity to comment on any proposed activity which is added, deleted, or substantially changed in terms of purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries following the submission of the Final Statement of community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The regulations require the City to adopt and make public its definition of "substantial change." The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall consider a "substantial change" to have occurred under the following circumstances: t22- 1 009D 1. The amount to be allocated to any activity is proposed to be + increased or decreased from the amount in the Final Statement by more than 25 percent. 2. The location of the activity, target area, or eligibility criteria of the program, is changed from that described in the Final Statement. 3. An activity not included in the Final Statement is proposed for funding. 6. An activity included in the Final Statement is proposed for elimination or cessation. Should the City Council consider a substantial change in any CDBG funded activity, the public will be notified and provided an opportunity to comment upon the proposed change. �-2nYp' � 1 VIII - CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and with 21 CFR 570.303 of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulations, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that: (a) It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a community development and housing program. (b) The City Council has duly adopted a resolution authorizing the :Mayor to submit the final statement and amendments, thereto, and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the Mayor to act in connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional information as may be required. (c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, it has: 1. Met the citizen participation requirements of 570.301(b). 2. Prepared its Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds in accordance with 570.301(c) and made the Final Statement available to the public. (d) It is following a Detailed Citizen Participation Plan which: Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income who are residents of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used and provides for participation of residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods as defined by the City; 2. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the Secretary of HUD and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act; 3. Provides for technical assistance to groups representative of persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance in developing proposals with the level and type of assistance to he determined by the grantee; 4. Provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities, ft24— 110 and review of program performance, which hearings shall be held after adequate notice_, at times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the handicapped; 5. Provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and grievances, within 15 working days where practicable; and 5• Identifies hew the needs of non- English speaking residents will be at in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non - English speaking residents can he reasonably expected to participate. (e) The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with: 1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 3'02, 42 V.S.C. #2000d et seq.). 2. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 -20). (f) It will affirmatively further fair housing. (g) It has developed its Final Statement of Projected Use of Funds so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the Final Statement of Projected Use of Funds may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the conmranity and other financial resources are not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under Section 106 of the Act, and if applicable, under Section 108 of the Act, during the 1992 -93 program year, shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 70 aercent of such funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such period. (h) It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified in paragraph (g) above, that identifies community development and housing needs and specifics both short- and long -term community development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective and requiiements of the Act. (i) It is following a current comprehensive housing affordability strategy (CHAS) which has been approved by Hun pursuant to 570.306 and Part 91, and that any housing activities to be assisted with CDBG funds will be consistent with the CHAS. f (j) It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted in whole or in part with funds provided under section 106 of the Act or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under Section 108 of the .Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessments made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements, unless: 1. Funds received under Section 106 of the Act are used he pay the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of such public improvements that are .financed from revenue sources other than under Title I of the Act; or 2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under Section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1) above. (k) it's notification, inspection, testing, and abatement procedures concerning lead -based paint will comply with 570.608. (1) It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as required under 570.606(a) and Federal implementing regulations; the requirements in 570.606(b) governing residential anti - displacement and relocation assistance plan under Section 104(d) of the Act (including a certification that the grantee is following such a plan); the relocation requirements of 570.606(c) governing displacement subject to Section 104(k) of the Act; and the relocation requirements of 570.606(d) governing optional relocation assistance under Section 105(a)(11) of the Act. (m) Tt has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non- vi.lent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against. physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non- violent civil rights demonstration within its jurisdiction; Iq2 (n) To the best of its knowledge and belief; No federal appropriated funds have been paid or w'11 be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan., or cooperative agreement; 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant_, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph (n) of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. (o) It will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition. 2. Establishing a drug -free awareness program to inform employees about; a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; b. The City's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace; C. any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and _3i- M-5 d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees + for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be aiven a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1. 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will: a. abide by the terms of the statement; and b. notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant: 61 Taking one of the following actions, within thirty calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted. (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a federal, state or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. 9. The grantee may insert in the space provided below, the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: 08- t t,` Place of Performance: Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Check X if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here; and (p) It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with other appl:cabie laws. _29_ �Gy Five -Year Goal: 3 loans. One-Year Objective: 1 loan. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planciac Oivislon, CDBG Program. Priority 2.3: The constructior: of infrastructure improvem_ets to benefit both very low and low income households including handicapped accessibility needs. Five -Year Goal: Complete needed infrastructure improvements in Southwest Cucamonga And begin improvement in Old .Alta Loma. Complete handicapped access facilities as needed throughout the target area. One -Year Objective: Continue work toward completion of southwest Cucamonga street rmorovements. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, CDBG Program. Priority 2.4: Acquisition and homebuyer assistance for low income first time homebuyers. Five -Year Goal: 10 households. Depending upon the number of available homes that come on the market. One -Year Objective: 2 .Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Redevelopment Agency Priority 2.5: Provide facilities and services to identified homeless persons. F1V,Year Goal: Provide support to those services assisting the homeless population in Rancho Cucamonga. Assist 30 cases. One -Year objective: Provide assistance to the extent possible to area service providers to assist homeless individuals from Rancho Cucamonga. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, CDBG Program. Priority 2.6: Provide support and services to other persons with special needs. Five -Year Goal: Provide support to services in order to assist 80 cases. .231 one -Year Objective: Provide assistance to the extent possible to those services who provide verified assistance to those with special needs. EXHIBIT E ,n nuwooso + �e3013 i i iww +o.+aapxW nMowmvsao Vq��ficmw Cti��gY (f'�i ^- - _— .__.�_ —:__ FuMUq Sowca Eayacr W A mlaa YIMAwabY nGaewW RalraYabn Avp+fmn None &ryr Planvry _ w i._ -_owc w % 1Gx FdMSl Funds (A) lBl IGI (D) (E) (F) iG) INl W) 41. ToW SWa Funds -- _0_ _0_ 42. Taal local Funds 14,159 7 523 _ - D_____ _ _1.141_ __.- ❑_ -.._ ____ulL -� >- __IGII -U- -u- 43. ToW PmWa Furls -0- 44. TOW - UMfIdoslFsab 14 159 T 523 -0- 7 343 -0- -Q- -o- 160 -0- -0 —_ B. Crand TOW An funds 15,144 a c , l -0- -o- ,n nuwooso + �e3013 i i RESOLUTION NO. C 1_ Ili A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALL- ORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OB,SECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Pro Dram; and WHEREAS, City staff has received proposals for projects and programs from various organizations in the Community; and WHEREAS, City staff has conducted a needs assessment to determine program eligibility and needs; and WHEREAS, the City released a Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives indicating all programs and projects submitted for Block Grant funding in the next program year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public an Opportunity to respond to staff's -ecoimnendations for program funding and to put forth for Council's consideration recommendations of their owni and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard public testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Bloch, Grant Program for, the next program year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions: A. Determine that operation of the Housing Rehabilitation Program in the flood plain is the most practical and desirable of the alternatives and the proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. H. Select for preliminary funding the following projects and programs to be funded out of the City's Community Development Block Grant award: 20c) CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CDBG PRELIMINARY STATEMENT - CITY Ue H.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 Program Carry Over FY 1992 -93 Total (Estimated) (Estimated) Administration $ 17,750 S 92,450 $110,200 SW Cucamonga Streets 199,616 147,130 346,745 Sidewalk Grindinv 11,424 5,940 17,364 Wheel Chair Ramps 11,410 6,936 16,346 Home Improvement 112,329 214,032 326,361 Oldtimers Foundation -0- 5,000 5,000 Graffiti Removal 31,540 10,412 41,952 Fair Housing -0- 8,476 6,476 Landlord /Tenant -0- 7,628 7,628 Neighborhood Center 67,777 6,410 74,187 Fair Housing Testing -0- 2,814 2,814 House of Ruth 2,561 2,000 4,561 (from Sr. Shared) Homeless Outreach -0- 10 ,00., Contingency -0- 31,770 31,770 $5511000 $1,005,404 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Lvl RESOLUTION NO. qJ - // '�. + A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU.C.AMONGA, AL ?FORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY (CHAS) TO REVISE THE ONE -YEAR ACTION PLAN AND TABLE 4/5A TO ALLOW FUUNDING OF SUGGESTED PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES IN THE 1992 -93 FISCAL YEAR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On April 151 1992, the City Council of the City of Fareno Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for consideration of the City's Comprehensive Henning Affordability Strategy, hereafter known as "CHAS." (iii All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the CHAS is the accepted housing strategy to guide housing assistance decisions in conjunction with the City's Commn:nity Development Block Grant Program and other Federal assistance programs. (b) That the proposed amendments to the CHAS are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies contained in the Housing Element, in that the CHAS provides for further implementation of the Housing Element through its suggested strategies and programs. (c) That the amendments to the CHAS will allow the City to provide funding for public service. activities in the 1992 -93 Fiscal Year related to providing assistance to the homeless or other special service activities. (d) This Council hereby finds that the CHAS and related amendments are exempt from the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Section 15061(8)(3) which states that where it can be seen with certainty that there is no Possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect of the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Z D'L CITY COUNCIL* RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TO CHAS - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 3. Eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Council hereby approves the amendments to the CHAS as provided in the attached Exhibit. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. '2 o -5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director SUBJECT: EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE POLICIES COST RECOVERY - HERITAGE PARK EQUESTRIAN CENTER RECOMMENDATION To accept the Equestrian Center Usage Policies and the proposed increases in fees and charges and new fees as they affect the Heritage Park Equestrian Center. The Park and Recreation Commission at their March 19th meeting recommended to City Council to approve Resolution $91 -194B and the Usage Polices. BACKGROUND The direction from the Park and Recreation Commission was to develop Equestrian Center Usage Policies within the first quarter of 1992. These new policies are attached. Recovery costs for this center were deferred in the cost recovery process until policies were developed. Attached is the proposed resolution (No. 91 -194B) to City Council recommending cost recovery for the Equestrian Center. The Equestrian Usage Policies were developed by staff, equestrian representatives, and City Council and Park and Recreation Subcommittee. Groups that provided input are the Alta Loma Riding Club, Rancho 4 -H Group, and Therapeutic Equestrians. The final draft has been reviewed by all applicable participants. In addition, staff had scheduled two workshop dates, February 10th and February 18th, to address comments and questions from the sport groups. No representatives from any of the sport groups attended the either workshop. The Committee assignment was to ensure parity of recoverable costs with other groups and /or organizations affected by the cost recovery process. It is the opinion of staff and the equestrian committee that this task has been accomplished. The proposed equestrian recoverable cost documents were distributed to sport groups, and the two dates mentioned above were set to receive input. COST RECOVERY - EQUESTRIAN CENTER April 15, 1992 Page 2 SUHIIARY To accept the Equestrian Center Usage policies, which include the Matrix, and the proposed increases in fees and charges and new fees as they affect the Heritage Park Equestrian Center. Respectfull submitted, Joey, chintz, CLA' 1 Co nity servi a Director JS /kls Attachments cc: Cost Recovery Subcommittee Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent LC) S r SUBJECT: EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE POLICIES EFFECTIVE: PURPOSE: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Services Department, Recreation Division, coordinates the use of all city parks, athletic fields and other park facilities available to organizations and the general public for cultural, social and recreational activities and programs. This document sets forth the procedures of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for managing all available equestrian facilities under its ownership and /or allocation control.. The equestrian center shall be considered a positive opportunity for people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to share with each other, to develop leadership capacities, to learn skills for present and future enjoyment, and to emphasize responsibilities to each other and the community. By nature of having an equestrian center for drop -in use and programmed activities, there are limitations imposed on use. This policy and procedure document describes limitations of programming at this center to coordinate compatible use. POLICY: The facilities at the equestrian center may be reserved in accordance with this policy and procedure and the terms and conditions of use herein described. No permits will be issued for uses incompatible with the equestrian center. APPLICATION: Park reservation forms are available from the Community Services Department. Priority will be given to applications in the order received. Requesters will be notified within four working days if their permit is approved, disapproved or needs revising. City staff shall work with primary user groups to ensure coordination of all events. ko EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE TERMS OF USE Page 2 No permits will be issued for the public meeting room that may be incompatible with equestrian center uses. Examples of compatible use are: • adult meetings • youth group meetings for 12 and over age group. Users must confine program activities within the meeting room. A permit is required for sole use of the facility or any portion of the facility not available for use by the general public for drop -in use, It is the intent of this procedure document to ensure that one arena always allows drop -in use by the equestrian user. Equestrian Center may be reserved up to a year in advance. Person requesting permit will receive a formal signed authorization to use the city facility. A copy must be readily available for inspection by city staff or sheriff representative. All deposits /monies required upon approval of the application. The reserving party must be in attendance at all times during requested use. Private financial gain on public property is prohibited. • Lining /Markino: Lining of city parks with chalk is not permitted without written permission granted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • Restrooms: Facilities must be clear of rubbish and debris upon completion of scheduled activity by user. • Activity Start Time: Events may not begin before 8:00 a.m. weekdays, weekends or holidays. Use must end by 10:00 p.m. week nights and Saturdays. No lights are available on Sundays without special permission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. Zo l EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE Page 3 • Cancellations: The City of Rancho Cucamonga may + cancel park facility use for any of the following reasons: city engaged in work involving any of the facilities. 2. Health and safety of participants threat- ened due to impending conditions, including but not limited to heavy rains, smog alerts, pesticide spraying, earthquakes. Insurance: The City requires groups using its facilities to provide a minimum $1 million comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance policy. The City of Rancho Cucamonga must be named as additional insured on the policy by providing a certificate of insurance so naming the city, its officers, employees, agents and elected officials. Users agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its elected Officials, officers, agents, and employees free from all claims for damage to persons or property by reason of user acts or those of users employees, agents, volunteers, guests or invitees in conjunction with use and occupancy of the facility. The certificate of insurance must be reviewed and approved by the Community Services Department prior to being given authorization to use the facility. • Traffic and Parking: The user groups must assure the City, via a plan, that participants and spectators utilize off- street public parking areas. During shows the user will provide at least one person to direct participants and spectators to designated parking areas. No vehicle will be allowed on city property, other than parking lots, without written permission. Public Address Svstem e: organized scheduled event sound amplification equipment will be allowed in city parks, but limited to public address systems, stereo equipment, stationary and portable components and bull horns, subject to the following conditions. Zoo EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE Page 4 1. Request to use the public address (P.A.) + system must be included on the facility use application. 2. Decibel readings of sound will be monitored by city staff at each facility and power limits set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the source or property line, whichever is closer. 3. All users will be responsible for guaranteeing the sound level not to exceed 74DBA by installing permanently an automatic control system to be tested and approved by the City prior to each season's use. 4. The direction of sound from the P.A. system speakers will be toward spectators and /or bleacher areas. 5. The P.A. System use will be permitted only between the hours of s:oo a.m. and 9:30 p.m., Monday thru Sunday, unless otherwise approved by City Council. 6. Only persons 18 years and older will be allowed to operate the public address system. 7. All public address system use for events must pertain to the activity. Special announcements and continuous announcing should be kept to a minimum. s. Failure to comply with the above requirements by user groups will result in one of the following: A. First offense: Verbal warning followed by written communication. B. Second offense: Payment of staff time to monitor sound system at rate set in Music and Amplification Policy at the next use scheduled by the group. C. Third Offense: Loss of system use until a hearing can he set with the Park and Recreation Commission. 9. User should obtain a copy and be familiar with the Community Services Department Music and Amplification Policy. - OOq EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE Page 5 Maintenance: The City will maintain parks for y Public use. Any request to modify or improve any city facility shall be submitted for review to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and may be heard by the Park and Recreation Commission and City Council for approval. No permanent structure or equipment shall be erected on city facilities unless approved by those bodies and dedicated for community use. No balloons or other inflatable devices shall be erected on bridle trails or at equestrian facilities. Any maintenance, vandalism, or safety concerns should be reported to the Community Services Department immediately. Emergency situations can be called in to the Police who will contact appropriate city staff. Any additional maintenance requested above the set city standard for that facility will be paid for by the requester and done by the City except as agreed upon in writing. An annual maintenance program is to be submitted to the City Council prior to budget approval for review and comments. Once projects are approved by council, the Park Maintenance Division of Public Works will notify the Community Services Department regarding scheduled maintenance on each park. Maintenance will attempt to be flexible in accommodating user groups but, ultimately, Park Maintenance must be concerned with the health and safety of the user. This may require the closure of parks, the denial or zancellation cf use of a park, and the seeking of alternate sites for use, if available. Snack BarLKitchen Usage: All food and beverages served to the general public must follow the Sports Field Snack Bar Facilities Procedure. The City will provide only the structure and existing equipment as presented in tine origin. =.i building design. It is the group's responsi- bility to provide any and all other equipment. All equipment purchases must meet city approval and health services equipment regulations prior to purchase, The City does not assume any liability for the equipment at any time during its use or storage in the snack bar. "Z1� EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE Page 6 • Storage: User shall follow the Community Services Department Storage Area Allocation Procedure for any equipment stored in the storage /maintenance area. • Lights: Users will adhere to the City's outdoor Athletic Lighting Policy & Procedure. • Signage: The following general regulation will be posted for use of the equestrian center by the general public: 1. All signs, banners, or decorations must be in compliance with city ordinances and /or regulations. The posting of signs, banners, or decorations must be requested in advance and cannot be used without the written consent of the Director of Community Services or designee. All masking tape, string, streamers, and similar decorations will be thoroughly removed during the clean -up process. • Equipment: Any damages that occur during the rental of tha facility are the responsibility of the renting organization. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be reimbursed for all damage within ten (10) days of presentation of bill. Kos: Keys will be issued annually to the presidents or chair of each of the following organizations: Alta Loma Riding Club 4-H Club Therapeutic Equestrian Group These keys shall open restrooms, snack bar, storage, meeting room, and roll -up windows. Facility will be re -keyed as necessary every even year. • Other Regulations: No use of generators, tents, gazebos without written permission by Community Services Department. Request of other amenities may require additional forms and permits. Individuals or groups will not be allowed to dispense refreshments or food of any type to the general public. Those who wish to serve food to the general public must follow the Community Services Department Snack Bar Policy. 2)I EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE Page 7 Individuals or groups found to be littering, damaging city property, or violating any city code or policy may have their permit cancelled, be required to make restitution to the City and be refused further permits. Disorder among individuals or groups shall be cause for cancellation of a permit and may be cause for denial of future permits. Any individual or group, whether holding a permit or not, may be denied the use of an area if the condition of the area warrants or groups are in violation of any ordinance, rules or regulations of the City. No smoking in any enclosed area or room. Alcoholic beverages are not permitted in any city park. An annual evaluation of use and cost recovery shall take place. • Fees and Charges The City council has adopted fees for Equestrian Center use in the City. Refer to the Community Services Department Cost Recovery Handbook for charges. Once each month there is no charge to use equestrian building or community centers for use by nonprofit groups who are residents. Fees and charges for this area will be as follows: USE GROUP 1 2 3 d 5 6 * Hourly Room Rental 8 am - 5 pm None $3.75 $7.50 $15 $15 $30 5 pm - 8 am None 7.50 12.00 25 25 50 ** Daily Snack Bar/ N/C 5.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Kitchen Lights 508 actual energy consumption (1992) Annual Shared N/C $75 N/A N/A N/A N/A Storage Fee * Includes use of P.A. System. ** A deposit may be required for this use. LIZ EQUESTRIAN CENTER MATRIX COST RECOVERY ITEMS Feb. 5. '992 DESCRIPTION (RECOMMENDED Agreed To Be Consida of NOT RECOMMEND BUDGETARY IMPACT AMOUNTS (COSTS (RECOVERED QQST RECOVERY [rFMC 1. Groups will provide City with X liability insurance. 2. Light costs will be X recovered. iQ 3. Parity w /youth groups in X S3 /day + pro - snack bar rental fee. Q rated equipt. 4. Check out set of keys to ALRC X & Rancho 4 -H, including Staff hourly restroom keys. Any other rate is varied use or building would need to pay staff time to open and close building. 5. Open to other groups to use X facilities/bldgs. (See " below) 6. "If snack bar used by out- side groups, replacement of Irg. equipt. (stove, refrig.) X would be City's responsibility. if exclusive use by clubs, they would replace kitchen equipment. Q 3 options: A) ALRC pays for Installing coin motors @ arenas: cost is $1500 per arena, the user pays for light use per hour. B) ALRC does not pay for coin motors and the City pays for metered box and recovers the box cost and lighting fee through pay -as- you -go cost recovery. C) No coin meters installed and the Clty continues to bill ALRC monthly for actual use. Q2 Formula 5450=-16 =6 days = $3; r $ZOO capital reimbursement; thus, total fee Is $5.00. L)� DESCRIPTION RECOMMENDED Agreed To Be Considered NOT RECWA4£ND BUDGETARY IMPACT AMOUNTS COSTS RECOV0 COST RECOVERY rrEMS (conYd) 7. Private financial gain on X public property is prohibited. 8. Any activity that would X exclude drop -in use of facility requires special permit. i.e.. shows, clinics, lessons. 9. Once a month no charge use X of equestrian building per year; which is parity w /youth organizations which are given one no- charge meeting per month at community centers. 10. Give ALRC and Rancho 4 -H X l maintenance pager numbers for emergencies (same as with youth sports). 11. Show & clinic equipment X repair /replacement responsibility of clubs. 12. Re -key entire facility. X I $75 Q This Is a $75 cost as needed. The ALRC will pay to have separate keys for the meeting room, snack bar, kitchen, and storage. 7- Ik-I RESOLUTION NO. 91 -1948 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91 -194, TO INCLUDE USER FEES FOR RECP.EATION ACTIVITIES AND RENTALS A. Recitals. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 91 -194 establishing a Comprehensive Fee Schedule: and WHEREAS, current rates of user fees for recreation activities and rentals have now been established; and WHEREAS, all consumable costs are to be recovered; and WHEREAS, the following groups are defined: Group 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co- sponsored events; other governmental agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. Group 2: City resident not -for- profit, civic, athletic, social organizations whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidate's night. Group 3: City resident not - for - profit, civic, athletic, social organizations who has paid management. Group 4: City resident private party activity, City resident employee organizations, City resident political candidate use for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. Group 5: City resident commercial, business, profit- making and religious organizations, non - resident not - for- profit, civic and social organizations; non - resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non - resident private party activity, non - resident employee associations. Group 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit- making and religious organizations. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1) s Resolution No, 91 -194B Page 2 y follows: Equestrian Center Fees and Charges will be as USE GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 6 * Hourly Room Rental 8 am - 5 pm None $3.75 $7.50 $15 $15 $30 5 pm - 8 am None 7.50 12.00 25 25 50 ** Daily Snack Bar/ N/C $5.00 $5.00 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 Kitchen * ** Lights 50% actual energy consumption (1992) Annual Shared N/C $75 N/A N/A N/A N/A Storage Fee * Includes use of P.A. System. ** A deposit may be required for this use. (See Equestrian Usage Policies.) * ** The small arena will have a coin metered box for electrical cost recovery. The large arena will recover electrical cost via direct billing for actual use. Z)�p CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 v TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council. Jack Lam, ALCP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (3 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the South side of Foothill Boulevard west of the Cucamonga Creek. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. B. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial. - APN: 208- 091 -36, 56, 57, and 72. C. For 13.12 .^.cres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: Portion of 208- 321 -24. D. For 8.63 acres of Land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 591 -21 through 35. E. For 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 through 23, 27, 29, 37, and 38. in CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, £SPA 92 -61, S DDA 92 -01 - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 F. For 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. G. For 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of Cuoamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -01 and 31. H. For 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -06 and 36. I. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subarea: J. For 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive on the east .side of the Deer Creek Channel. The City Council will also consider including this property in the Haven overlay District of the industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 208-331 -24 through 26. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the south side of Foothill Boulevard west of the Cucamonga Creek, The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. Z16 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, FSPA 92 -01, y DDA 92 -01 - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 3 • B. For 1.84 acres of lard located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwest corner of Sar, Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue. The Planning Cc=ission recommends denial - APN: 209 - 091 -36, 56, 57, and 72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: Portion of 208- 321 -24. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 4MENDMENT 92 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Development Districts map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 591 -21 through 35. B. For 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 through 23, 27, 28, 37, and 38. C. For 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. D. For 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arran Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -01 and 31. E. For 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -06 and 36. 21� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SPA 92 -02, FSPA 92 -01, 6 DDA 92 -01 - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 4 u F. For 15.333 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Roche and Archibe'd Avenue. The ci <y council will also consider Low Residential 2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -12, 73, 15, 17, 25 through 27. e. From Medium -nigh Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subarea: G. For 10.91 acres of land located on the noon side of Civic Center Drive on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel. The City Council will also consider including this property in the Haven Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 208- 331 -24 through 26. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. RECOMMENUATIGN The Planning Commission makes the following recommendatione to the City Council: Subarea A: Denial (To remain Medium Residential) subarea B: Denial (TO remain Medium Residential) Subarea C: Approval. to Low - Medium Residential Subarea D: Denial (TO remain Medium Residential) Subarea E: Denial (To remain Medium Residential) Subarea F: Denial (TO remain Medium Residential) Subarea G: Denial ('110 remain Medium Residential) Subarea H: Denial (TO remain Medium Residential) Subarea 1. Approval to Low- Medium Residential subarea J: Approval to Medium Residential SACAGRODND S ANALYSIS The subject amendments are a result of City Council direction for the Planning Commission to develop recommendations to reduce the comounity's amount of vacant, uncommitted, multiple family land and to reduce the density allowed on that land using the City's formal amendment process for the General Plan, Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Victoria Community Plan. The Counci.l's goal was to ensure, at the 220 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA g2 -02, FSPA 92 -01, & ODA 92 -01 - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Pace 5 City's build -out, that multiple family dwelling units comprise no more than 32 to 35 percent of the City's total dwelling unit count. The Council directed the Planning Commission to investigate all vacant, underdeveloped, and uncormnitted multiple family land for potential land use changes to single family, lower density multiple family, and other non - residential designations which could to appropriate on a site -by- site basis. At their meeting of February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission made the above- described recormendatiens to the City Council. The Planning Commission concurred with staff's recommendation in each case except for Subarea D. In this subarea, the Planning Commission felt the long, narrow lot configurations would be more difficult to develop at Low- Medium Residential standards than at Medium Residential. Also, the Commission felt that Medium Residential would make lot consolidation easier and that ingress and egress could also be provided easier under Medium Residential. A minority opinion felt that Low- Medium Residential with a master plan requirement, as provided in the Focthill Boulevard Specific PCan, could address the lot consolidation and ingress /egress concerns. The majority of the Commission agreed with staff's recommendations for Subarea "i "; however, an alternate viewpoint was expressed that Commercial may be appropriate for the western portion of Subarea "I" and that Medium Residential would allow for density transition between the existing Mobil station and the single family homes to the north. However, this alternative is still possible at some future date and application. CORRESPONDENCE The Planning Division has received proposed land use changes from so These items have been advertised as Daily Bulletin newspaper with properties ha-:e been posted, and property owners. Resoectf ly submitted, Brad Bua er City P anner BB:VB /jfs seven letters of opposition to the me of the affected property owners. public hearings in the Inland Val lley an eighth -page advertisement, the notices were sent to all affected ZZ l CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, FSPA 92 -01, G ODA 92 -01 - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Roos 6 r Attachments: Planning Coamission Staff Report dated February 26, 1992 Planning Commission Minutes dated February 26, 1992 GPA 92 -02, Subarea A, Resolution of Denial FSPA 92 -01, Subarea A, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea P, Resolution of Approval FSPA 92 -01, Subarea H, Resolution of Approval SPA 92 -02, Subarea C, Resolution of Denial FSPA 92 -01, Subarea C, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea D, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea A, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea E, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea H, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea F, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea C, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea G, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea D, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea H, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea E, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea I, Resolution of Approval DDA 92 -01, Subarea F, Ordinance of Approval GPA 92 -02, Subarea Jr Resolution of Approval DDA 92 -01, Subarea G, Ordinance of Approval 2z z, r� C1 1'y UN RANCHO CUCAMONGA STIFF REPORT DATE: February 26, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANn aFNFRAT. PT.AN ANeun U2 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA74ONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the south side of Foothill Boulevard west of the Cucamonga Creek - APN: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. B. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN: 208- 091 -36, 56, and 57, and 227- 091 -72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APN: Portion of 208 - 321 -24. D. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 Dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APN: 207- 591-21 through 35. E. For 8.02 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 10, 11, 13, 20 through 24, 27, 28, and 37, and 38. F. For 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue - APN: 207- 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. G. For 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207 - 211 -01 and 31. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J February 26, 1992 Page 2 H. For 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207- 211 -06 and 36. I. For 18.56 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use ,designation - APN: 208 - 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07, and 208- 311 -03 04, 12, 13, 15, 17, 21, and 23 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subarea: J. For 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel. The Planning Commission will also consider including this property in the Haven Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation - APN: 208 - 331 -24 through 26. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map From Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Specific Plan on the south side of Foothill Boulevard west of the Cucamonga Creek - APN: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. B. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Specific Plan on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN: 208 - 091 -36, 56, and 57, and 227- 091 -72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Specific Plan on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APN: Portion of 208 - 321 -24. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. 7_7 k_1 #1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 52 -02, A THROUGH J February 26, 1992 Page 3 to amend the Development Districts Map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APN: 207- 591-21 through 35. B. For 8.02 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 207- 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 10, 11, 13, 20 through 24, 27, 28, 37, and 38. C. For 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue - APN: 207- 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. D. For 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, and approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207- 211 -01 and 31. E. For 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207- 211 -06 and 36. F. For 18.56 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APN: 208 - 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07, and 208- 311 -03, 04, 12, 13, 15, 17, 21, and 23 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential. (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subarea: G. For 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel. The Planning Commission will also consider including this property in the Haven Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation - APN: 208- 331 -24 through 26. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. 22 S A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J February 26, 1992 Page 4 ACTION kEOUESTED: Approval of a General Plan Amendment, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment, and Development Districts Amendment and issuance of a negative declaration. BACKGROUND: The subject applications are a result of public workshops held by the City Council on August 9, 1990, and January 31, 1991, regarding multiple family housing development in the City. These workshops were the result of citizens' concerns relating to the increase in multiple family dwelling unit developments and the decrease in single family dwelling unit developments which was perceptually changing the community's residential character. City staff reviewed the status of multiple family housing prior to the workshops. Using various scenarios, staff identified the effects on City revenues and services if vacant and underdeveloped multiple family land were rezoned to single family or to lower density multiple family designations. During the workshops, citizens and City Council members expressed concern over increased traffic volumes, increased demands on City services, and overcrowded conditions in local schools which were all perceived to be linked to the increase in multiple family dwelling unit development. The Council determined that a reduction in the anticipated total housing unit count would lessen the negative affects of residential growth on the community. As a result of the workshops, the City council directed the Planning Commission to develop recommendations to reduce the community's amount of vacant multiple family land and to reduce the density allowed on that land using the City's formal amendment process for the General Plan, Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and Victoria Community Plan. The Counc'il's goal was to ensure, at the time of the City's build -out, that multiple family dwelling units would comprise no more than 32 to 35 percent of the City's total dwelling unit count. The Council directed the Planning commission to investigate all vacant and underdeveloped, uncommitted multiple family land for potential land use changes to single family, lower density multiple family, and other non residential designations which may be appropriate on a site -by- site basis. The Planning commission and City Council have previously reviewed land use designations in the Etiwanda and Victoria areas for density reductions and the council has redesignated 272.83 acres of undeveloped multiple family designated land. This includes 118.81 acres of land in the Etiwanda Specific Plan changed from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and 18.64 acres in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan changed from Medium Residential L Z LC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J February 26, 1992 Page 5 r (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to commercial and office designations. Within the Victoria Community Plan, 48.97 acres was changed from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), 76.06 acres changed from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), and 10.36 acres changed from Medium -High Residential (14- 24 dwelling units per acre) to non residential uses. On January 14, 1992, staff conducted a meeting with the affected property owners. The intent of the meeting was to give the property owners an opportunity to ask questions of staff regarding the proposed amendments. Many of those who attended the meeting were opposed to the staff recommendations as outlined in this report. ANALYSIS: General Issues - A review of issues which apply to all, of the subareas within the application and a review of the cumulative effects of the proposed land use amendments are provided as follows: Land Use: Staff's initial analysis concluded that the land use amendments would stay within residential land use categories. It is anticipated that the least amount of land use conflicts will result from this approach. Therefore, staff's initial evaluation of land use amendments reflects a change from the subject site's existing density range to the next lower density range. If the Planning Commission wishes to consider land uses other than residential for any of the subject properties, then staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue a portion or portions of this item to a later meeting so that staff could provide an analysis. Non conforming Development Standards: When the General Plan and Development Code Land Use Maps are amended, there are instances when existing structures are no longer in conformance with the new development standards. The General Plan does not prohibit the land use map to be modified in such a manner; in fact, when the General Plan was adopted in 1983, there were many instances when properties no longer conformed with the new uses and or development standards. The Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan restrict non conforming uses and structures from being expanded; however, they are allowed to be maintained with certain restrictions. Z21-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J February 26, 1992 Page 6 3. Housing: The effects Of the proposed land use amendments on City housing policies are as follows: a. The dwelling unit reductions should not conflict with any specific policies, goals, or objectives of the General Plan Housing Element. The Housing Element provides for programs which aid in the development and improvement of the City's housing stock. The dwelling units required by those programs which list specific numbers of dwelling units to be built or to be aided would be included within the remaining units expected to be built under the amended dwelling unit totals. Reductions in the total number of dwelling units at the build -out date would result in marginally greater proportions of low and very low income units, program -aided units, etc. �. The revised cumulative total of approximately lu,0oo dwelling units conforms with the Housing Element's anticipated range of dwelling units proposed for development for the period up to 1994 (Program 3.A.1). B. Subarea Analysis - A review of the subarea recommendations, alternatives, and site - specific issues relating to each proposed amendment is attached to the staff report, CUMULATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Part I and Part II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and Development District Amendments. The issue for consideration is a reduction of proposed land use intensity; therefore, staff believes the impact of development should not be more significant than originally described in the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the Development Code. In addition, staff analyzed the individual properties and found that the changes would not have a significant environmental effect upon them. Further, the reduction in potential future housing units does not affect the City's ability to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan Housing Element. CORRESPONDENCE: The Planning Division has received seven letters Of Opposition to the proposed land use changes from some of the affected property owners. These items have been advertised as public hearings in the Viand Valley Daily Bulletin with an eighth pace advertisement, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all affected property owners. 2zg 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J February 26, 1992 Page 7 Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan Amendment Subareas Map Exhibit "B" - Subarea Analysis Exhibit "C" - Letter from Carol and Don Hart Exhibit "D" - Letter from Vincent Szeto Exhibit "E" - Letter from Judy K. Matthews Exhibit "F" - Letter from R. Brent and Annette Hoffman Exhibit "G" - Letter from Robert K. Kidder Exhibit "H" - Letter from Mr. Robert and Hoffman Exhibit "I" - Letter from Joe Dianat with Mobile Service Station Exhibit "J" - Pete and Lori De Jager GPA 92 -02, Subarea A, Resolution of Denial FSPA 92 -01, Subarea A, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea B, Resolution of Denial FSPA 92 -01, Subarea B, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea C, Resolution of Approval FSPA 92 -01, Subarea C, Resolution of Approval GPA 92 -02, Subarea D, Resolution of Approval DDA 92 -01, Subarea A, Resolution of Approval GPA 92 -02, Subarea E, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea B, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea F, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea C, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea G, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea D, Resolution of Denial GPA 92-02, Subarea H, Resolution of Denial DDA 92 -01, Subarea E, Resolution of Denial GPA 92 -02, Subarea I, Resolution of Approval DDA 92 -01, Subarea F, Resolution of Approval GPA 92 -02, Subarea J, Resolution of Approval DDA 92 -01, Subarea G, Resolution of Approval Z Z9 Ilene the GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT SOAREAS MAP I ✓ A IL co co -z 0� r. IIR12 7W 0 500 1000 i Soo 2,5c) SCALE IN FEE' EXHIBIT •A* 0 gym, J =r O LL IEEE F U SUBAREA A y, c ei .� m ,. � othil� 9 North 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Su;rounding Land Use and Zonira: North - offices and vacant land, Office in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan South - Vacant, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)' East - Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, Flood Control West - Mobile home park, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan b. General Plan Desiarations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units North - Office per acre) South - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control /Utility Corridor West - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) 7-57- EXHIBIT "B" GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, '992 Page 2 Site Characteristics: The property has an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. There are no structures on the site; however, there are native grasses, shrubs, and mature eucalyptus trees. LAND USE ANALYSIS• The project site is bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the north, an existing mobile home park to the west, and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel to the east. Currently there are no Low- Medium Residential designations in the immediate area. The site limitations of the subject properties would make it difficult to develop a single family project that would be compatible with the mobile home park to the west. Also, a single family designation could create a neighborhood isolated by Foothill Boulevard, the flood control channel, and the mobile home park. The subject properties total 5.71 acres of land which alone may not be enough land to develop a cohesive neighborhood. other land use designations were not analyzed because it was believed that any densities lower than Low - Medium would not be feasible given the above - described conditions. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low - Medium would not be the most appropriate land use designation for the subject properties and that the existing Medium Residential designation should be retained. FACTS FOR FINDING: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and with related development. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea A of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the mobile home park, flood control channel, and major boulevard bordering the subject properties on three sides. In addition, there are no existing single family land use designations in the immediate vicinity, therefore, the proposed land use designation of Low - Medium Residential would create an isolated neighborhood. 233 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea A. and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92- 01, Subarea A, to the city Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. Z��A GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 4 SUBAREA B North 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Surrounding Land U zoning: North - Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Apartments (existing, nonconforming) , Community Commercial in the Footh4_11 Boulevard Specific Plan East - Single family residences and vacant land, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Office /Professional West - Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, Flood Control b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - commercial East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Office West - Flood Control /utility Corridor 23 �- GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 5 r c. Site Characteristics: The properties have an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. There are three single family homes on the north side of San Bernardino Road with ornamental plants and trees planted around them. The property on the northern side of the site is vacant with native scrub vegetation and alluvial rocks. LAND USE ANALYSIS: Vineyard Avenue to the northeast, the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks to the northwest, the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel to the west, and the General Commercial designation to the south, all create an isolated condition for the subject properties. The project site totals 1.84 acres of land which in itself would be difficult to develop a cohesive single family neighborhood. Also, the configuration of the subject properties and their proximity to Vineyard Avenue would make it difficult to develop the properties to the Low- Medium development standards. The existing Medium Residential development standards allow for less private open space and more common open space which allows for greater flexibility in designing a project compatible with the surrounding conditions. Other land use designations were not analyzed because it was believed that any densities lower than Low- Medium would not be feasible given the above - described conditions. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low - Medium Residential would not be an appropriate land use designation for the subject properties and that the existing Medium Residential designation should be retained. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and with related development. b. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea B of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the subject oropertiesf relatively small size and proximity to Vineyard Avenue which is a secondary arterial. 254u GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 6 4. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea B, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92- 01, Subarea B, to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. Z3I GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 7 SUBAREA C - I � LLB Foothill Blvd. a ■ O C O T1 2 I 7_ North • 1. PROJECT AND SITE DFSCaIPTION: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Community Commercial in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan South - Apartments, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Mobile home park, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan b. Genera' Plan Plan Desianat�s: Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) North - Commercial South - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) Z 5s GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 8 Site Characteristics: The property has an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. The property is vacant with native grasses and alluvial rocks; however, there are no trees or shrubs. LAND USE ANALYSIS: Staff analyzed the following land use options. Low- Medium Residential: The property to the west is designated Medium Residential and is developed with a mobile home park. The properties to the south are also designated Medium Residential and are developed with an apartment complex that is primarily one story. The properties to the east are designated Low Residential and are developed with single family residences. The most intense land use in the area is the property to the north which is designated Community Commercial and is vacant. Given the low intensity of the developments to the south, east, and west, and the relatively large size of the subject parcel (13.12 acres) , a single family project could be developed at the Low - Medium standards. This designation would be compatible with both the Medium Residential and Low Residential developments and could act as a transition between the two developments because the Low- Medium development standards allow for flexibility for building setbacks and clustering under the optional development standards. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low - Medium Residential would be the most appropriate land use designation for the subject properties. ' b. Low Residential: Low Residential may not be compatible with the existing mobile home park to the west because the Low Residential development standards require greater building setbacks and fewer options for building clustering than Low - Medium Residential allows, This would create an isolated neic,hborhood that may not be compatible with the Community Commercial designation to the north because it would not act as a transition like the Low- Medium Residential would. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be an appropriate land use designation for the subject properties. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Genera]. Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent 13c GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 9 with the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. C. The properties located in Subarea C of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the existing developments to the south, east, and west between which Low - Medium Residential could act as a transition. 4. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 92- 02, Subarea C, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92 -01, Subarea C, to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. L40 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 10 SUBAREA D 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTrON: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning; North - Condominiums, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residences and vacant land, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West. - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) c. Site Characteristics: The property has an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. There are six Z41 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 11 single family residences which front on Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. Ornamental Plants and shrubs have been planted around these homes. LAND USE ANALYSIS: Staff analyzed the following land use options. Low - Medium Residential: The properties to the west and south are designated Low Residential and developed with single family residences. The properties to the north and east are designated Medium Residential and are developed with a condominium project and vacant land, respectively. A Low - Medium designation would be compatible with both the Low and Medium designations and could act as a transition between the two densities due to the Low- Medium development standards which allow for flexibility in building setbacks and clustering under the optional standards. The subject properties are irregularly shaped and would be difficult to develop at either Medium Residential or Low - Medium Residential development standards and in either case would require considerable lot consolidations. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low - Medium Residential would be the most appropriate designation for the subject properties. Low Residential: A designation of Low Residential would allow for the continuation of the same land use that exists to the west and south. However, it may not be as compatible as Low - Medium Residential would be with the Medium Residential to the north and east because Low Residential would not provide for a transition between the two densities. Low - Medium Residential would allow for more flexibility in open space, setbacks, and building orientation under the optional development standards which could provide greater compatibility with the adjacent developments. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be the most appropriate designation for the subject properties. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. "Ly2 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 12 c. The properties located in Subarea D of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the ability of the Low- Medium Residential to act as a transition between the existing Low Residential and Medium Residential designated land. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 92- 02, Subarea D, and Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea A, to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. 2u3 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 13 SUBAREA E 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Surroundina Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Condominiums and single family residences, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Single family residences, Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designations: Project site - Medium Res per acre) North - Medium Residential South - Medium Residential East - Medium Residential West - Medium Residential dential (8 -14 dwelling units (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) c. Site Characteristics: The properties have an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. There are nine --244 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 14 single family residences, all of which front on Arrow Route. In addition there is a motel and market on the eastern most property. Ornamental shrubs and trees have been planted around most of the homes. LAND USE ANALYSIS: The property to the north of this subarea already has an approved subdivision, map that will allow for the development of 115 condominiums on 10.27 acres of land (11.2 dwelling units per acre) and the properties to the south are already developed with condominiums. The intensity of the land uses already developed and approved to the north and south of the subject properties may make it difficult to develop a compatible project on the subject site at the Low - Medium development standards. Further, standard single family developments may be difficult to develop given the long, narrow properties (averaging 700 feet in depth and 76 feet in width) within the project site. Other land use designations were not analyzed because it was believed that any densities lower than Low - Medium would not be feasible given the above - described conditions. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low - Medium Residential would not be an appropriate designation for the subject properties and that the existing Medium Residential designation should be retained. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea E of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of land developed or approved for Medium Residential projects to the north and south of the subject properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of General Plan Amendment. 92 -02, Subarea E, and Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea B, to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. 2 4 Jr GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "S" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 15 SUBAREA F 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninc: per acre) North - Single family residences (existing, North nonconforming), Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling dwelling units per acre) South South - Single family residences (existing, nonconforming), offices, and a restaurant; (8 -14 General Commercial units per acre) East - Condominiums, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling dwelling units per acre) West - Condominiums, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designations Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units 114 - per acre) North - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial East - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) 114 - GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 16 c. Site Characteristics: The properties have an average natural slope of less than to percent. There are four single family residences which front on Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue. There is also a nursery on Madrone Avenue. Ornamental trees and shrubs have been planted around the homes. LAND USE ANALYSIS: The property to the south of the subject property is designated General Commercial and the properties to the west and east are designated Medium Residential and are developed with condominium projects. In addition, there are no Low - Medium residential designations in the immediate area and this designation would create an isolated single family neighborhood. In addition, there could be potential vehicular access problems if the properties are developed under the Low - Medium standards while the Medium standards would allow for shared access. other land use designations were not analyzed because it was believed that any densities lower than Low - Medium would not be feasible given the above - described conditions. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low- Medium Residential would not be an appropriate land use designation for the subject properties and that the existing Medium Residential designation should be retained. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea F of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of General Commercial land to the south and existing condominiums to the west and east. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea F, and Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea C, to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. 2 ys SPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 17 SUBAREA G _ I 1 G ®® ®90DI ®En 1 � of m ® c�` 0 E m 0 .S AL North 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Condominiums, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, Flood Control West - Market and motel, mobile home park, and vacant land; Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designa s: Project site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control /Utility Corridor West - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) 248 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 18 C. Site Characteristics: The property has an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. There are no structures; however, there are native grasses, shrubs, and mature trees including eucalyptus and cypress. There is a former flood control levee on the northeastern portion of the property. LAND USE ANALYSIS: The subject properties form a linear configuration which, along with Subarea "A ", extend from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard on the west side of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel. The only property in the vicinity that is currently designated Low - Medium is to the west of the subject properties and is developed with a mobile home park. Given the linear nature of the properties (527 feet average width and 1,956 feet in depth) and the absence of any single family residential development adjacent to the properties, a Low - Medium designation may create an isolated single family neighborhood. The configuration of the subject properties may also be difficult to develop to the Low - Medium Residential development standards because they do not provide as much flexibility as Medium Residential does for common open space, building orientation, and vehicular access. Other land use designations were not analyzed because it was believed that any densities lower than Low - Medium would not be feasible given the above - described conditions. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low- Medium Residential would not be the most appropriate land use designation for the subject properties and that the existing Medium Residential designation should be retained. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea G of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the linear configuration of the subject properties which may be difficult to develop to the Low - Medium Residential development: standards. z4y GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 19 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning commission recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea G, and Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea D, to the City Council through the adopticn of the attached resolutions. 2>0 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 20 SUBAREA H aD® ®® ® al 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: A Nonh North - Vacant land and a single family residence, community Commercial in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residence (existing, nonconforming) and condominiums, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Condominiums, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, Flood Control b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) North - Commercial and Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) zsl GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 21 y West - Flood Control /Utility Corridor Site Characteristics: The property has an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. There are no structures on the property; however, there are native grasses, shrubs, and two mature eucalyptus trees. LAND USE ANALYSIS: The subject property is south of an existing Community Commercial designation and is north and west of existing condominium projects. There are no single family designations in the vicinity and a single family designation would again create an isolated neighborhood. Medium Residential allows for greater flexibility in building setbacks and clustering that would allow development on the property to be compatible with surrounding development. Other land use designations were not analyzed because it was believed that any densities lower than Low - Medium would not be feasible given the above - described conditions. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low- Medium Residential would not be the most appropriate land use designation for the subject properties and that the existing Medium Residential designation should be retained. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea H of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by absence of single family zoning designations in the vicinity and the higher intensity land uses surrounding the site. RECOMMPNDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea H, and Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea E, to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. Z5L GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 22 SUBAREA I 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT ON: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial shopping center, civic building, and single family residences; General Commercial and Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Apartments and church, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Office /Professional b. General Plan es ignitions: Project Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial, Civic /Community, and Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Office z s "3 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 23 site Characteristics: The properties have an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. There are 16 single family residences, all of which front on Arrow Route, and there is also a church and motor home campground or. one of the properties. There is an existing automobile service station on the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route which was approved by the Planning Commission on October 1, 1978, and was completed by November, 1981. Ornamental shrubs and trees have been planted around the residences, church, and automobile service station and the northwestern most parcel is vacant with native grasses. LAND USE ANALYSIS: Staff analyzed the following land use options. Background: Since staff began the analysis of the multiple family unit reductions, a project consisting of 35 condominium units on 3.5 acres of land has been approved by the Planning Commission for the four eastern most properties in this subarea. The properties have been included in the project site and advertised for consideration; however, they have not been included in the. attached resolutions. Low - Medium Residential: The subject properties are located south of existing single family homes that are designated Low Residential, west of an apartment complex and church designated Medium Residential, east of vacant land designated Office /Professional, and north of a shopping center and single family homes designated General Commercial and Low Residential, respectively. Due to the proximity of single family neighborhoods to the north and south of the subject properties, a Low - Medium designation would be compatible with those two uses and provide enough area (15.33 acres) for single family developments to be built conforming with the Low - Medium development standards. The more intense nearby land uses are not as dominating as the less intense uses. For instance, the apartment complex to the east (build at a density of approximately 3.8 dwelling units per acre) of the subject properties is one story and the property adjacent to the east is a church. Churches are typically compatible with single family neighborhoods. Also, the shopping center to the south across Arrow Route that is designated General Commercial comprises only 1.86 acres of land and the Office Professional designation to the west totals only 6.12 acres of land. A Low - Medium designation for the subject properties could act as a transition between the Low Residential to the 2-511 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 24 north and the General Commercial to the south, similar to the function of the existing Medium Residential designation. In addition, a Low - Medium Residential designation would be more compatible with the existing single family homes than the existing designation and would allow for flexibility in building setbacks and open space requirements. The Mobil Service Station on the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route is presently an existing, non - conforming structure and would retain the same status. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low - Medium Residential would be an appropriate land use designation for the subject properties. Low Residential: Although this designation would be a continuation of the uses that exist to the north and south and may be compatible given the existing developments, it may not provide an appropriate transition between the Low Residentiai and Commercial developments. Lew Residential development standards do not allow for the variation in building setbacks and clustering that are allowed under Low - Medium standards which would provide flexibility in developing compatible projects. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be the most appropriate land use designation for the subject properties. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. C. The properties located in subarea I of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of single family developments to the north and south of the subject property. ECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 92- 02, Subarea I, and Development District Pmendment 92 -01, Subarea F , to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. 2 5S GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 25 SUBAREA J 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIO : a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vineyards and existing single family residences, Haven Overlay District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan South - Apartments, Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) East - Vineyards, Haven Overlay District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan West - Deer Creek Flood Control Channel, Flood Control b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) North - Industrial Park South - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) East - Industrial Park West - Flood Control /Utility Corridor Z 5 -(P GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 26 C. Site Characteristics: The properties have an average natural slope of less than 10 percent. Vineyards occupy the entire properties. LAND USE ANALYSIS: Staff analyzed the following land use options. Medium Residential: The subject properties are bordered on the north and east by vacant land in the Haven Overlay District (Subarea 6 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan) and to the south by existing apartment complexes designated Medium -High Residential. The subject properties total 10.91 acres of land and would allow for 87 to 153 apartment or condominium units under Medium Residential development standards. Medium Residential would be compatible with the surrounding uses while lowering densities because the development standards are similar to Medium -High standards. Therefore it is staff's opinion that Medium Residential would be an appropriate land use designation for the subject properties. b. Haven Overlay District !Subarea 6 of the Industrial Area Soecific Plan): This designation would be a continuation of the land uses that exist to the east and north and would be compatible with the surrounding land uses. However, a need for additional office /industrial uses has not been identified. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that this would not be the most appropriate land use designation for the subject properties. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the Planning Commission could make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will. provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea J of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the existing multiple family residential development to the south and the ability of Medium Residential to be compatible with the industrial uses allowed for the properties to the north and east. ZS1 GPA 92 -02, A THROUGH J EXHIBIT "B" - SUBAREA ANALYSIS February 26, 1992 Page 27 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 92- 02, Subarea J, and Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea G, to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. ZSg by the Cemission to consider alternate species. He thought perhaps a combination of deciduous and evergreens may be used. He noted that it'had been a typical policy of the Commission to require raplacmnt of trees in kind and in sire when mature trees are lost which were scheduled to have been preserved. He said that was why staff had requested a larger size. He asked if the Commission wished to direct that smaller trees be used for this project. Chairman AcNiel and Commissioner Vallette felt it would be appropriate to use smaller treat. Motion: Moved by Tolstmy, seconded by Chitisa, to Issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Modification to Tentative Tract 13566 and Design Review thereof with modification to utilize 15- gallon size trees with the species and spacing of the replacement trees to be determined by the City Plasu,er. Motion carried by the following vote, AYESI COMMISSIONERS, CHITIEA, MCNIRL, MELCMER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carrion E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the general Plan Land Use Map an described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas. A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea I of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the south Bide of Y othill Boulevard west of the Cucamonga Creek - APMz 207- 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. s. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwet corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue - APMz 208- 091 -36, 56, 57, and 72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the wet side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Comission will also consider Las Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APNz Portion of 208- 321 -24. D. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning CcmisoLon will also consider Low, Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APK, 207- 591 -21 through 35. E. For 6.02 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APM, 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 10, 11, 13, 20 through 24, 27, 26, 37, and 38. F. For 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue - APNs 207 - 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. Planning Comissior Minutes H2- February 26, 1992 LS G. For 19.07 acres of land located on the went aide of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet sout)6 of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207- 211 -01 and 31. H. For 12.14 acres of land located on the want aide of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207- 211 -06 and 36. I. For 18.56 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) an an alternative land use designation - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -03, 04, 12, 13, 15, 17, 21, and 23 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subarea: J. For 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Canter Drive on the east side of the Deer Creak Channel. The Planning Commission will also consider including this property in the Haven Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation - APN: 208- 331 -24 through 26. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEeewcwT W12 EC42THILL 92 -01 - CITY Or BO CV AMnnca - A ^ AMCR proposal to, emend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Madium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Specific Plan on the south side of Poothill Boulevard want of the Cucamonga Creek - APN: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. B. For 1.84 &cram of land located in Subarea 2 of the Specific Plan on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnalian Avenue - APNs 208- 091 -36, 56, 57 and 72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Specific Plan on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APN: Portion of 208- 321 -24. Staff recommends issuance of A Negative Declaration for the entire application. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 2 -01 - CITY OF BAR= CUCAMON A - A proposal to amend the Development Districts map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (6 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwlling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation - APN: 207 - 591 -21 through 35. B. For 8.02 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 207- 201 -01, 03, 06, 07,'10, 11, 13, 20 through 24, 27, 28, 37, and 38. Planning Commission Minutes c13- February 26, 1992 2 ('O She said they plan to build some apartments on their lot to provide income when they were no longer able to work. George Lightner, 5078 Granada Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is a real estate developer and a member of the Affordable Housing Task Force. He felt apartments would be the best and higheat use for the property. He requested the zoning remain Medium because he Celt that would help provide affordable housing. He remarked that California gets more residents every year than home. can be built for. He did not think it would be economical to build at Law - Medium. There were no further comments regarding Subarea D. Chairman M.Niel next asked for comments an Subarea E, but there were none. He then asked for public testimony on Subarea F. Carol Hart, P. o. Box 1056, Upland, stated She own. a lot on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrons Avenue. She agreed with staff's recommendation that the corner remain Medium. She suggested that Commercial be considered in the future. John March, 8551 Madrone Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he owns the Emerald Nursery. He requested that the zoning remain Medium. He reported that before the City incorporated he had signed a petition requesting Commercial zoning, but the zoning was changed to Commercial for only the parcel on which the Cask 'N Cleaver is located. There were no further comments regarding Subarea P. Chairman McNiel then asked for testimony regarding Subarea M, but there was none. He next asked for comments regarding Subarea I. Greg Bennett, Donley- Bennett Architects, 12821 Newport Boulevard, Tustin, stated he represented the group of owners of approximately 8 -1/2 acres on the westerly portion of Subarea I. He felt General Commercial would be a more appropriate designation because of the existing commercial use to the South, existing office /professional usage to the west, the church to the east, and the intense commercial usage of the Mobil oil station on the corner. He said the group of owners had written letters, circulated petitions, and canvassed the neighborhood. He remarked that a Commercial designation would reduce overcrowding in schools, which he felt was the City Council's goal at the time they asked the Commission to consider radssignations. He thought it would be difficult to develop the area with single family homes and he felt even multi- family development would not be appropriate near the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Routs. Mr. Bennett showed slides of the area. He commented that the Mobil station is an existing non - conforming use and he felt a redesignation to Low - Medium would exacerbate the situation. He maintained that most of the existing single family homes on the eastern portion of Subarea I are tenant propert Les, are not well maintained, and are substandard by current development codes, He thought that a redeslgnation to Low- Medium would cause additional tenant properties to be built. He requested that the western portion of Subarea I be considered for Commercial and suggested that the eastern portion be maintained at Medium. He suggested that additional Planning Commission Minutes 1,25— February 26, 1992 L(O Brent Hoffman, 24 Briarglen, Irvine, urged the Planning commmieeion to consider that the area being considered is only a small pocket of land. He asked 7f development at Low- Medium would conform to the continuing development of the area and add to the City. He noted that he works for a developer and during the last 5 years moat projects were developed only because there was available capital, regardless of demand. He felt that hurt a lot of banks. He thought there would be demand for this property to be developed as Commercial. He noted that the City would have the ability to review any plans for development. Pets Ce Jager, 12396 Pipeline, Chino, stated he purchased 1/2 acre adjacent to the Mobil station. He said he purchased the Land about 8 months ago knowing that it was zoned for high density apartments because he felt it would become Commercial. He indicated he also owned two businesses in the shopping center across the street. He felt that if the property were rezoned to Low - Medium, it would be harder to rezone it ae Commercial in the future. Jan Grabor, 9786 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she had not purchased her property with the hope, that it would become Commercial. she maid she had lived her home for 17 years and within the last few years her house had been designated as a landmark house, known as the Beverly Hills House. She felt that special care is taken with respect to homes north of Foothill Boulevard, and she is interested in the quality of life south of Foothill. She said the area south of Foothill is historic. She said she was not opposed to Commercial or Low Residential, but she asked that the Planning Commission take special consideration of the landmarkad property because it requires special usage. She questioned if the beet usage of the land is to build another shopping center with more black top when so many complaxo■ in the City have empty buildings. She felt she would make a lot more money if she were to sell her property with the others as Commercial, but she thought it was her responsibility to stand up for the quality of life. Commissioner Melchor asked if Greg Bennett had over represented Ms. Grater's intereats. Ms. Grabor responded negatively. Jim Partridge, 9762 Cerise Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he lives in the neighborhood north of Subarea I and he had not seen anyone canvassing the neighborhood with a petition. He noted that single family homes are located north and south of Subaru I. He thought Low Residential would be great but he also felt Low - Madium Residential would be appropriate. He opposed Commercial. He remarked he would like to see more quality in the neighborhoods below Foothill. He suggested that Malven Avenue could be continued south to provide access to the site for single family development. He remarked that he had heard the signatures for the petitions ware gathered at the market on the south side of Arrow Route rather than in the neighborhood. Joe Silva, 1864 Westwood Place, Pomona, stated that he works in the General Commercial area. He remarked that there is a lot of traffic on Archibald and Planning Commission Minutes 131—_ February 26, 1992 2 -L, Z change the zoning to Commercial. He believed that in the meantime, Medium Residential would be a better transition from the Low Residential to the nSrth to the General Commercial to the South and the Office /Professional to the west. Mr. Bennett requested that the matter be continued for 60 days to allow the owners to file a formal application to study alternate uses. Chairman McNiel stated the ownere could file such an application even if the City reclassified the zoning. He said the City Council had directed that the Planning Commission review the properties and make a recommendation based on relationships with surrounding uses. Mr. Bennett felt that staff had only been directed to consider lower density residential uses and no alternative uses. Chairman McNiel stated that if the owners wish to have the property rezoned for Commercial, they should make an application. He said the Commission did not have any analysis upon which to base any decisions regarding the aware, suggested use of Commercial. There was no further testimony regarding Subarea I. Chairman McNiel requested testimony regarding Subarea J, but there was none. Chairman McNiel then closed the public hearing. General Plan Amendment 92 -02 19 6 rea A) Foothill Boulevard - -:s c Plan Amendment 92 -01 (SUbarse A). General Plan Ame dme t 92 -02 (Subarea G1. and pqvelo2Ment District Amendment (9 b 01: Commissioner Chitiea felt staff's recommendation to retain the Medium designation was appropriate. Commissioner Toletoy concurred. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Melchor to adopt the resolutions recommending denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea A), Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea A), General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea G), and Development District Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea D). Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, HELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea SI and Foothill Boulevard Scocific Plan Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea B): Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the resolutions recommending denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea B) and Foothill Planning Commission Minutes tl%_ February 26, 1992 2 c,3 Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitiea, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (subarea C) and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment O_ -Oi (Subarea C), changing land use designations to Low- Hedium Residential. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCMER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried General Plan A.• d t 22 -02 (Subarea D1 and Devejq2Lnoatj p1qtrict Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea A): Commissioner Tolatoy felt the configuration of land ownership in the entire area is unfortunate. He felt that if anything could be done to alleviate the configuration, it would have to be at a higher density oecause of the lack of ingress or egress an the long lots. Commissioner Valletta questioned how higher density would be better for ingress and egress. Commissioner Toletoy felt higher density would make consolidation easier. Chairman McNiel noted that the Foothill Overlay District precludes development without master planning. He felt the same concept could be applied in this area and Low - Medium would be appropriate. Commissioner vallette noted that multi - family standards would not allow development on the individual lot, because of the minimum parcel •i,,, Brad Buller, City Planner, felt that Medium may encourage lot consolidation more than Low - Medium. Comniasioner Melchor felt that staff's recommendation was well founded. He stated he had heard the property owners' objections. He noted that one of the projects being considered for a Desf.gn Award this year is at the southeast corner of Bas* Line Road and Haven Avenue. He felt that project is exemplary in the way it addresses the transition of product type and density. He thought imposing a master planning requirement on the Subarea with the direction that transition of densities should be addressed within the project would allow the City to achieve a decrease in densities while providing a worthwhile project. He felt the zoning should remain at Medium. Commissioner Chitiea concurred with Commissioner Melchor because of the configurations. She agreed Medium would more likely encourage consolidation. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolatoy, to recommond denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subaru D) and Development District Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea A). Motion carried by the following vote: Planning commission Minutes Q February 26, 1992 Z (,q AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea Hi and Development Jistrlct Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea E1: Commissioner Chitiea felt that staff's recommendation of denial was appropriate. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the resolutions recommending denial of General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea H) and Development District Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea E). Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea I) and DOvOlOWent D strict Amendment 92 -01 fSubaree F1: Commissioner Valletta felt it was an appropriate location for Low - Medium because of the Low Residential to the north and the Low - Medium further west on Arrow Route. She remarked that if property owners wish Commercial, they should conduct market and traffic studies for Planning Commission consideration. Commissioner Melchor thought the western portion of Subarea I may be a logical site for Commercial. He did not knew of any existing or planned center south of Arrow Routs. He felt it would be possible to address density transition. for the mite within a Medium Residential designation with major uses closer to business sections. He noted that the Commission had recently denied a service station on the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road because of its proximity to residential development. He observed that the Mobil station on the corner has a mini - market. He felt downzoning would make it harder to mitigate the effects of the service station. He favored retaining the Medium designation and imposing a master plan requirement. Chairman McNiel felt the effects of the service station could be successfully mitigated adjacent to residential development. He thought the Law - Medium designation is appropriate because of the Low designation to the north and south. He observed that if the property owners present an application, the Commission would then consider that classification. He agreed with staff's recommendation of Low - Medium. Commissioner Tolstoy supported the Low - Medium designation. He observed that he has visited the tract to the north and it is a quiet neighborhood. He Planning Commission Minutes 1231 February 26, 1992 i C6— Chairman McNial thought perhaps lot depth. could be discussed on a future agenda. Commissioner Chitiea did not feel it is a pressing problem without an application. Commissioner Tolatoy did not feel it would be appropriate to increase the depth until an application is submitted which would be enhanced by such an increase. Motion: Moved by Tolatoy, seconded by Chitiea, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution, reeommanding approval of General Plan Amendment 92 -02 (Subarea J) and Development District Amendment 92 -01 (Subarea G), changing land use designations to Modlum Residential. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried Commissioner Valletta noted that two Parcels south of Base Line and want of Etiwanda within the Victoria Community Plan are zoned High and had not ban. considered for possible redeeignation. She asked if the Commission could ask Citv Council for direction as to possible consideration. Mr. Huller stated staff had not considered the parcels because the City Council direction was to consider the areas north of Base Line Road within the Victoria Community Plan. He suggested that the matter could be added to the March il, 1992, agenda under Director's Reports to determine if the other Commissioners felt it would be appropriate to ask the City Council for direction. Commissioner Melchor noted there is A multi - family subdivision north of ^D^ Street where the street has never been capped. He asked staff to investigate. Barry* Hanson, Senicr Civil Engineer, commented that it is a private street and he suggested that Building and Safety could investigate. Motion: Moved by Tolatoy, seconded by Mc Niel, carried 0 -0 -1 with Melcher abstaining, to continue beyond 11:00 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned from 11:25 p.m. to 11:40 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes -23 - February 26, :992 2 b(- RESOLUTION N V 0. L - /'% + A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN A_MENDIKENT 92 -02, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAY FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FUR 5.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -18 THROUGH 21, 32, AND 34. A. Recitals. (r) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through . the adoption of Resolution No. 61 -40. (ii) on November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea A, as described in the title of this Resolution.- Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) on February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -25 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. lIv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisitns prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. G. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 11 This Council hereby specifically finds that all or the facts "t forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public bearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council herby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 5.71 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Creek and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and 2(r,7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA A - CITY OF A.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Office and are partially developed with offices; the property to the soutn is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwellino units per acre) and is vacant; the property to the east is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek -Flood Control Channel; the property to the west is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a mobile home park.; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan a1d with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea A of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the mobile home park, flood control channel, and major divided arterial bordering the subject properties on three sides; in addition, there are no existing single family land use designations in the immediate vicinity, therefore, the proposed land use designation of Low- Medium Residential would create an isolated neighborhood; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and .1. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea A, to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 5.71 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Creek as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 2(0$ EXHIBIT 'A" j U It ft o$ a` 0 Q� 5o Y I m d U ai � Foothill Blvd. o w a c c m c 0 e North EXHIBIT 'A" RESOLUTION NO. 'Ta' r�r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (9 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO :Ali- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -9 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -15 THROUGH 21, 32, AND 34. A. Recitals. (i) On September 16, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 87 -505. (ix) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea A, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -26 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does I ereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council ' nereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, thin Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 5.71 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Creek and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and 2 70 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO, FSPA 92 -01, SUBAREA A - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Office and are partially developed witn offices; the property to Cho south is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant; the property to the east is designated Flood Control and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; the property to the west is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a mobile home park; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea A of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the mobile home park, flood control channel, and major divided arterial bordering the subject properties on three sides; in addition, there are no existing single family land use designations in the immediate vicinity, therefore, the proposed lard use designation of Low- Medium Residential would create an isolated neighborhood; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92 -01, Subarea A, to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 5.71 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Creek as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Lei a ' UUU�1 P Q� �O x yd v �p0tfiill Blvd. o a m Cl) m e A C U _ A North EXMIBIT 'A" RESOLUTION NO. a2- (15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA B, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 1.54 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BER.NARDINO ROAD AND CARNELIAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - ARK: 268- 091 -36, 56, 57, AND 72. A. Recitals. (i; On April, 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81 -40. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea B, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed Public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -27 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 1.84 acres of land located on the ncrt *west corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and 773 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CPA 92 -02, SUBAREA" B - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 • (b) The properties to the north of the suhject site are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way; the property to the south is designated Commercial and is developed with An existing, non- conformino apartment complex; the properties to the east are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Office and are developed with single family residences and vacant land; the property to the west is designated Flood Control /Utility Corridor and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development w!.thin the district in a manner consistent: with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea B of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the subject properties' relative small size and proximity to Vineyard Avenue which is a secondary arterial; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea B, to amend the General Plan Land Use Map fror Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre; for 1.84 acres of land located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. zl 4 .u► Foothi North ■ EXHIBIT "A" RESOLL'T ION NO. 9C _ (' (,p y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT_ 92 -01, SUBAREA B, TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 1.84 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BERNA.RDINO ROAD AND CARNELIAN AVENUE. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - AIN: 208- 091 -36, 56, 57, AND 72. A. Recitals. (i) On September 16, 1987, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 87 -505. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea B, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -30 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (ivl On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded raid hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: i. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15f 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 1.84 acres of land located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (e -14 dwelling units per acre); and L7�, CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. F'SPA 92 -01, SUBAREA B - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way; the property to the south is designated Community Commercial and is developed with an existing, non- conforming apartment complex; the properties to the east are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Office /Professional and are developed with single family residences and vacant land; the property to the west is designated Flood Control and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea 8 of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the subject properties' relative small size and proximity to Vineyard Avenue which is a secondary arterial; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92 -01, Subarea B, to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.84 acres of land located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Zip y .. North EXHIBIT W RESOLUTION NO. Ct�. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA C, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE KAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITE PER ACRE) TO IOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 13.12 ACRES OF LA140 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 209- 321 -24. A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General. Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 91 -40. (fi) On November 15. 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea C. as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion, of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -31 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April. 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (A) The application applies to 13.12 acres of land located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and 271 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA C - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is desi quoted Commercial and is vacant; the properties to the south are designated Medium Residential (9 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with apartments; the properties to the east are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; the property to the west IS deal mated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a mobile home park; and (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policizs of the General Plan and will provide fox development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea C of this application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the existing developments to the south, east, and west between which Low - Medium Residential could act as a transition; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts or. the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration, 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to approve General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea C, amending the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 13.12 acres of land located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The Oity Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 2° o Foothill North H—fl i EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. q),!t� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COIiNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING "OOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA C AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN' LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS. PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 13.12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA .AVENUE, SOUTH OF 'FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND NIARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - ARN: PORTION OF 208- 321 -24. A. Recitals. (i) On September 16, 1987, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enac:.meot c: the Foothill Boulevard Soecific Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 87 -505. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea C, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed Public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -32 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prier to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that, all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 13.12 acres of land located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwPlliiq units per acre); and Zg z CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. F'SPA 92 -01, SUBAREA C - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Community Comere -al and is vacant; the properties to the south are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with apartments; the properties to the east are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; the property to the west is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a mobile home park; and (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies Of the Ceneral Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Elementi and (e) The properties located in Subarea C of this application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the existing developments to the south, east, and west between which LOW - Medium Residential could act as a transition; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the. surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to approve Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 92 -01, Subarea C, amending the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 13.12 acres of land located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution z 6 R Foothill Blvd. i Nofth i 11111, � O' S EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. ✓� - 1I I y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA D, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND HSE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8) DWELLING, UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 8.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201- 591 -21 THROUGH 35. A. Re ci ra ls. (I) On April 0 1981, ' -11e City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption, of Resolution No. 81 -4C. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea D, as described in the title of this Re solution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1932, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearinq on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -33 reccvnending to the City Council that the application he denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFOP.E, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part As of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically `Inds as follows: (a) The application applies to 8.53 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and is developed with single family residences; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (0 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the south is designated Low Residential (2 -4 LOS CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA D - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 dwelling units par acre) and is developed with single family residences; the property to the east is designated Medium Residential i8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences and vacant land; the property to the west is designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of ^..he General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendnent does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea D of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the unusual lot configurations and the difficulty of the subject properties in meeting the Low - Medium Residential development standards; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea D, to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. EXHIBIT 'A' RESOLUTION N0. at IOv A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA A, Tb AMSND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITG PER ACRE) FOR 8.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FLNDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN; 287- 591 -21 THROUGH 35. A. Recitals. (i) On December 7, 1983, the City Council of the Ci «y of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Development Code through the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. (ii) On November a5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea A, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -34 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and is developed with single family residences; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and Zug CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO, DDA 92 -01, SUBAREA A - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the south is designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences; the property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences and vacant land; the property to the west is designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Lard Use Policies of the General Plan and wi11 not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and with related development; and (d; This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea A of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the unusual configurations and the difficulty of the subject properties in meeting the Low - Medium development standards; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea A. to amend the Development Districts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. i EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. (//d -') J y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF/ THE CITY OF RANCHO CJCAMONG.A, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL. PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA E, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 THROUGH 23. 27, 28, 37, AND 38. A. Recitals (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81 -40. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea E, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -35 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. A. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council durino the above- referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this council. hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 6.71 arses of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and is developed with single family residences; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is undeveloped; the properties to the south are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units LRI CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA E - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 per acre) and are developed with condominiums and single family residences; the property to the east is Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is undeveloped; the properties to the west are designated Medium Residential (6 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea E of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of land developed or approved for Medium Residential projects to the north and south of the subject properties; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 abovef this Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea E, to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. JIM EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO + CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AN5hTJMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA B, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LAW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING r- INDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 201 -01, 03, 05, 07, 13, 20 THROUGH 23, 27, 28, 37, AND 36. A. Recitals. (i) On December 7, 1983, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Development Code through the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea B, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -36 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cur_amongn conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenred public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: !al The application applies to 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and is developed with single family residences; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and 21q CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. ODA 92 -01, SUBAREA P - C1TY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of rile subject site is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is undeveloped; the Properties to the south are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with condominiums and single family residences; the property to the east is Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is undeveloped; the properties to the west are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and with related development; and (d) This amendment does net promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea 9 of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of land developed or approved for Medium Residential projects to the north and south of the subject properties; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea B, to amend the Development Districts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -6 dwelling units per acrel for 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. L '7 7 EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. q) "')i w A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA F, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWTLLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 4.95 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MADRONF. AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 262 -01 THROUGH 05, 38, AND 39. ,-. Recitals. (i) On April e, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81 -40. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea F. as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to an "the application." (iii) On February 2E, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application, and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -37 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue and is developed with single family residences and a nursery; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 --14 dwelling units per acre); and 97 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NU. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA F - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; the property to the south is designated Commercial and is developed with single family residences, offices, and a restaurant; the property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the west is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and id) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea F of this application are not suitable for tie uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of Commercial land to the south and existing condominiums to the west and east; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea , to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -9 dwelling units per acre) for 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. i EXHIBIT 'A' RESOLUTION NO. 9) - p q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMON GA, CALIFORN iA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA C, TO AMEND In DEVF.LOPMESi DISTR =S MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (5 -14 D'n'EL,Ln'G UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL. (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOP 4.95 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MADRONE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 262 -01 THROUGH 05, 38, AND 39. A. Recitals. (i) Or. December 7, 1933, the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment, of the Development Code through the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. (ii) On November. 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea C, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -38 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (i v) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. D. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as fellows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue and is developed with single family residences and a nursery; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and 3n,C) CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DDA 92 -01, SUBAREA C - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the nort'h of the subject site are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; the property to the south is designated General Commerc_al and is developed with single family residences, offices, and a restaurant; the property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the west is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Lard Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not pronote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea C of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of Commercial land to the south and existing condominiums to the west and east; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and J. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 abnve, this Council hereby resolves to deny Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea C, to amend the Development Districts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 3n 1 EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA G, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE NAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL. (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOP. 19.07 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CUCAMONGA CREEK, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF F00'THILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -01 AND 31. A. Recitals. (i) on April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81 -40. (ir) On November 15, 1991, tie City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea G, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -27 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992s the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and =1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CPA 92 -02, SUBAREA G - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is undeveloped; the property to the south is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units Per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the east is designated Flood Control /Utility Corridor and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; the properties to the west are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with a market and motel, mobile home park, and vacant land; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Flan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea G of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the linear configuration of the subject properties which may he difficult to develop to the Low-Medium Residential development standards; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Genera] Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea G, to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of the Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Say EXHIBIT 'A" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA D, TO AMEND "HE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL f8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 19.07 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CUCAMONGA CREEK, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 211 -01 AND 31. A. Recitals. (i) On December 7, 1983, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Development Code through the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. fit) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea 0, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca�aonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -28 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (rv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: 301'P CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DDA 92 -01, SUBAREA D - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (a) The application applies to 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is undeveloped; the property to the south is designated Medium Residential i8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the east is designated Flood Control and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; the properties to the west are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with a market and motel, mobile home park, and vacant !and; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea D of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the linear configuration of the subject properties which may be difficult to develop to the Low - Medium Residential development standards; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings o`. the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea D, to amend the Development Districts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 19.07 acres of land located on the west side of the Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 1J 0 `7 EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. �3)- JJ� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-02, SUBAREA R., TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM SODIUM RESIDENTIAL (6 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PEP. ACRE) FOR 12.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDITiGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -06 AND 36. A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81 -40. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92-02, Subarea H, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and fallowinq the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -39 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically Finds as follow.: fa) The application applies to 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre): and 3a� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA H - CITY OF R.C. April 15, tg92 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Commercial and are developed with single family residences and vacant land; the property to the south is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences and condominiums; the property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the west is designated Flood Control /Utility Corridor and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea H of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the absence of single family zoning designations in the vicinity and the higher intensity land uses surrounding the site; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea H, to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. EXHIBIT 'A° RESOLUTION NO. O Q - I d L1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CSTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENOM= 92 -01, SUBAREA E, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO Loll- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 12.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, .APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 211-06 AND 36. 4. Rec;.als (i) On December 7, 1:83, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Development Code through the adoption of Urdinan ce No. 211. (ri) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea E, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application.' - (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -40 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On .April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council nereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff, reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevar6 and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per arse); and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DDA 92 -01, SUBAREA E - CITY OF P.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The prooerties to the north of the subject site are designated Community Commercial and are developed with single family residences and vacant land; the property to the south is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences and condominiums; the property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with condominiums; the property to the west is designated Flood Control and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development_ Code, and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea E of this application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the absence of single family zoning designations in the vicinity and the higher intensity land uses surrounding the site; and (f) Thin amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced b_v the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea E, to amend the Development Districts Man from Madiu" Residential (P, -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 12.14 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A." 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 2) ) 3 a U w- 1111 illl c mm= C A Nolzh EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. qa - /j 9 9 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN .3MENDPL^•NT 92 -02, SUBAREA I, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27. A. Recitals (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81 -40. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea I. as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -41 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as fellows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue and is developed with an automobile service station, single family residences, a church, and a motor home campground; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre); and s CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA I - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; the properties to the south are designated Commercial and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with a cosmarcial shopping center, Civic building, and single family residences; the properties to the east are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with a single family residence; the property to the west is designated Office and is vacant; and (c) This amendment does not Conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea I of this application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of single family developments to the north and south of the subject property; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to approve General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea I, amending the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 15.33 acres cf land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 31 �0 EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE NO. Lf O L/ + AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA F, AMENDING THE DEVFLOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWWELLING UNITS PEP. ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208 - 291 -01 Td ROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27. A. Recitals. (i) On December 7, 1983, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Development Code through the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. (11) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea F. as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public tearing, adopted Resolution. No. 92 -42 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (5.v) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this ordinance. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the ordinance Have. occurred. H. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue and is developed with an automobile service station, single family residences, a church, and a motor 3 �'Q CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ODA 92 -01, SUBAREA F - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 home campground; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8- i4 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The properties to the north of tee subject site are designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; the properties to the south are designated General Commercial and Low Residential (2 -4 dwellina units per acre) and are developed with a commercial shopping center, civic building, and single family residences; the properties to the east are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and are developed .'ith a single family residence; the property to the west is designated Office /Professional and is vacant; and (c) Tni.s amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner con=istent with the General Plan, Development Code, and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea F of this application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of single family developments to the north and south of the subject property; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding Froperties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance. with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 21 and 3 above, Luis Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea F, amending the Development Districts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) Est 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 3 i9 y EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. Q} - I Y) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO + -..11CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ArPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -021 SUBAREA C, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 10.91 ACRES OF' LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 331 -24 THROUGH 26. A. Recitals ( i) On April 6, 1901, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 01 -40. (il) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92 -02, Subarea J, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) on February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -43 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows= (a) The application applies to 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive and on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre); and 3z I CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 92 -02, SUBAREA J - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and are undeveloped; the properties to the south arc designated Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with apartments; the property to the east is designated Industrial Park and is undeveloped; the property to the west is designated Flood Control /Utility Corridor and is developed with the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel; and (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea J of this application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the existing multiple family residential development to the south and the ability of Medium Residential to be compatible with the office /light industrial uses allowed for the properties to the north and east; and (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to approve General Plan Amendment 92 -02, Subarea J. amending the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive and on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 3 22. EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE NO. °' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA G, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICIS MAP FROM MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MED',UM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 10.91 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 200- 331 -24 THROUGH 26. A, Recitals. (i) On December 7, 1983, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Development Code through the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. (xi) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 92 -01, Subarea G, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -44 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive and or, the east side of the Deer Creek Channel and is undeveloped; said property is currently designated Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre); and 1' Li CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE MO. ODA 92 -01, SUBAREA G - CITY OF R.C. April 15, 1992 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Medium -High Residential ( 14 -24 dwelling uni is per acre) and are undeveloped; the properties to the south are designated Medium -Iii gh Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with apartments; the property to the east is designated industrial Park and is undeveloped; the property to the west is designated Flood Control and is developed with the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel; and :.) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea G of this application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the existing multiple family residential development to the south and the ability of Medium Residential to be compatible with the office /light industrial uses allowed for the properties to the north and east; and (f) This amendment would not have significant ispacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 92 -01, Subarea G, amending the Development Districts Map from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) for 10.91 acres of land located on the north side of Civic Center Drive and on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel as shown in Exhibit "A." S. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. BLS EXHIBIT "A" -- C'11 "i 7F RANC1 -10 CCCANION-GA MEMORANDUM GATE: April 15, 19 92 (� l T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: 'Ailliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer— SUBJECT: EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY FOR LARK DRIVE - APN: 227 - 011 -13 Due to the ongoing negotiations regarding Item G -1 on April 15, 1992 Council agenda, Consideration of Eminent Domain Action to Acquire Public Right -of -gay for Lark Drive, the staff report and recommendation was not available for insertion in the agenda package. The staff report will be delivered by the Engineering Department to the Council next week prior to the City Council meeting. If agreement is made with Dr. Bauer, the agreement will be brought before the Council for review during Executive Session. dd0 /dlw Recommend approval of 11:00 p.m. light curfew variance and corresponding Memorandum of Understanding as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission. BACKGROUND District 21 Little League Administrator, Dave Bonham, desires to host two all -star tournaments in Rancho Cucamonga. These tournaments are as follows: District 21 Little League Tournament: July 7 - 23 @ Red Hill & Heritage Parks Sectional Big League Tournament: July 25 - 29 @ Red Hill Park As in past years, a light curfew variance is necessary for both parks requested. The request is for 11:30 P.M. curfew July 7 - 25, and a 12:30 a.m. curfew for July 27 & 29. The City's light use policy states that all sports field lighting must be off by 10:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and no lights may be used on Sundays. Variance to this policy can only be granted by City Council. In 1988 the city little leagues hosted the District 21 Little League Tournament at Red Hill & Heritage Parks. Traditionally this tournament rotates within the District every four (4) years; hence, the 1992 request. In 1988, City Council approved a variance of 11:00 p.m. for youth tournaments and midnight for the senior tournament. Last year the Big Leagues hosted the District Senior League Tournament at Red Hill Park. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA v STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 xq TO: Mayor and Members of the city Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director'I SUBJECT: TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF FIELD LIGHT CURFEW AT RED HILL AND HERITAGE PARKS Recommend approval of 11:00 p.m. light curfew variance and corresponding Memorandum of Understanding as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission. BACKGROUND District 21 Little League Administrator, Dave Bonham, desires to host two all -star tournaments in Rancho Cucamonga. These tournaments are as follows: District 21 Little League Tournament: July 7 - 23 @ Red Hill & Heritage Parks Sectional Big League Tournament: July 25 - 29 @ Red Hill Park As in past years, a light curfew variance is necessary for both parks requested. The request is for 11:30 P.M. curfew July 7 - 25, and a 12:30 a.m. curfew for July 27 & 29. The City's light use policy states that all sports field lighting must be off by 10:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and no lights may be used on Sundays. Variance to this policy can only be granted by City Council. In 1988 the city little leagues hosted the District 21 Little League Tournament at Red Hill & Heritage Parks. Traditionally this tournament rotates within the District every four (4) years; hence, the 1992 request. In 1988, City Council approved a variance of 11:00 p.m. for youth tournaments and midnight for the senior tournament. Last year the Big Leagues hosted the District Senior League Tournament at Red Hill Park. CITY COUNCIL MEETING VARIANCE OF FIELD LIGHT CURFEW April 15, 1992 Page 2 ANALYSIS Past tournaments in Rancho Cucamonga have had most games completed before the 10:00 p.m. curfew. However, it is Possible for games to go into extra innings or run late. Therefore, Little League is asking for an extension of the light curfew to ensure all scheduled games are completed as required by little league tournament rules. For the 1991 tournament, a similar request was brought before the Commission and City Council. Prior to Council approval, staff was directed to have little league representatives and area residents meet. The outcome was a memorandum of under- standing, which addressed concerns of the Red Hill neighbors. District 21 agrees to operate these two tournaments under a M.O.U. in 1992. (A copy of memorandum is attached.) An item is included in the 1992 M.O.U. seeking cost recovery for electrical use. The City received no complaints regarding the 1992 tourna- ment. Also, baseball representatives, who listed their phone numbers on a flier distributed to area residents, reported no phone calls. It is important to state that the impact on Red Hill and Heritage Parks is significant. The proposed tournaments would start on July 7th and continue until July 29th with only three out of 22 calendar days unused. At the March 19, 1992 Park and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission indicated that 11:00 p.m. would be the latest they would recommend the curfew extension. Mr. Bonham has stated that the District would work within the desired 11:00 time allowances except on the following dates: 1) Monday, July 27; and 2) Wednesday, July 29, where the 12:30 a.m. time allowance is needed to complete play on July 27 and would be used on the 29th only if a tie breaker game is necessary. Mr. Bonham, District 21 Little League Representative, will attend the City Council meeting and request the 12:30 a.m. light curfew be allowed to accommodate the senior tournament. Respectfully submitted, Jq� Sch ltz, CLP C unity Servic�t Director JS /kls Attachments 32.q pL \Ito +1 Little League Baseball, Inc. DISTRICT 421 J ra!ifornia District 2' i opy P CCAGo OiSir ict Admi nlstrato, Roger Birdsall 890 N. Pepper Avenue R!alto, Califomia 92376 (714) 875 -1093 Nir. Denna, Stoat., Mayor March 04, 1992 �,ity of Rancho Cucamonga OSOJ Crvic Center give .'anchc Cucamonga. CA 81730 RE: TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF THE FIELD LIGHT CURFEW Dear Mavor Stout, Lrttie League District 21, Alta Loma Little League and Citrus Little League would like to request a temporary variance of the 10:00 P.M. uaseball field light curfew for various dates between July 07 and July 29, This request is being made so that Citrus Little League and Alta Loma Little League can co -host the District 21 Little League all -star tournament and Citrus Little League can host the Section 6 Big League all -star tournament. District 21 boundaries are from San Bernardino to Rancho Cucamonga along the Interstate 10 corridor. Section 6 boundaries are from Sari Bernardino to West Covina along the Interstate 10 corridor. This request is due to the opportunity for the Rancho Cucamonga area to have first refusal of the Little League tournament and District 21 to host the Big League Sectional tournament. The "District', as well as the other leagues that participated in the past two years Senior District Tournaments and last years Senior Sectional 'tournament held in Red Hill Park were very impressed with the reception they received from the Rancho Cucamonga community. It is also widely held that the 90 fact field in Red Hill Park is the finest baseball playing facility in the district and the 60 foot fields at Red 'Hill and Heritage Parks take a back seat to no other facilities that this tournament has been held on ,n the past. This is certainly a testimony to the dedication of the rield maintenance personnel and the city otficiais involved. i9e Peel tLa+ hosting these tournaments are a great opportunity to :now our nelghboring communities the fin, public facilities tl.,at nre attnrded the youth sports organizations by the City of Rancho Cli- amonga. Please note that hosting these types of tournaments are at Best a "creak even" monetary activity for our leagues and are not looked upon as a fund raising event by Citrus and T.lta Loma Little Leagues, These tournaments, like all Little League runctions, are completely open and free to the public. No =• "Pt'r 110" ar.lmi:, ir,n whatsoever will be charged. Area I Area II Area III Area IV R.rth. Cucamonga fontana aia HO filoom,ngton COltnm Grand Terrace 3 3� -0 Loma Linda Redlands Y/�'�• ��,, Little League Baseball, Inc. Ue4�1 CzGfornia Cistrict 21 ean Mr. Dennis Stout, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Page -2- We would also like to point out that due to our experience In hosting these tournaments (most recently, Little League District in 1988, Senior District in both 1990 and 1991 and Senior Sectional in 1991) we are quite aware and concerned about the _.npact that the community surrounding these parks receive, it is our intention again to minimize or completely eliminate any in ^onveniences that our neighbors may realize. True variance requested is as follows: Red Hill Park 60 foot field 1) 11:30 curfew from Tuesday July 07 through Saturday July 11 21 11:30 curfew on Tuesday July 14 and Saturday July 18 Heritage Park 60 foot field 1) 11:30 curfew from Wednesday July 08 through Saturday July 11 2) 11:30 curfew on Monday July 13, Tuesday July 14, Wednesday July 15 and Friday July 17 Red Hiil Park 90 foot field 1) 11:30 curfew on Saturday July 25 2) 10:00 curfew on Sunday July 26 .3) 12:30 curfew on Monday July 27 4) No variance required on Tuesday July 28 5) 12.30 curfew on Wednesday July 29 Please advise us of any requirements that we must meet or actions that are required of us to aid the variance granting process. As always, please call me should you have any questions or require assistan,_e in this matter. Sincerely, Uistr'ict 21, Alta Loma Little�t.eagne Little Lergue Dave Bonham Dave Sievert Area 1 Administrator President 1714) 987 - 2.389 (714) 987 - 8481 Area Area II Area III Pd n(�c (.,(a rn Gn(d iG n,�nl Pia ltO 331 Citrus itt:le League J- / /mac j�f' "✓ G' ny Venzor President (714) 989 - 2202 Area IV e 1.n n91 pn.conon.w. ne T.,, :R Loma L,nda. Pediand% MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING The following points are agreed to as they relate to the Little League Tournament's request from July 7 to July 29, 1992. Agreeing little league parties are: Dave Bonham, Ginny VenZOr and Dave Sievert. • Home phone numbers and a fact sheet giving details of the tournament will be distributed by the leagues to homeowners within two blocks of the parks approximately two weeks before the tournament. The flier will include home number for Dave Bonham, District 21 Representative; Ginny Venzor, President of Citrus Little League, and Dave Sievert, President of Alta Loma Little League. In addition, the pay telephone number at the fields will be given so immediate contact can be obtained with the tournament directors. This will be done at league expense. • Vineyard, Beryl and Hillside streets will be posted "NO PARKING" on the resident side on Saturdays and Sundays by the leagues with signs provided by the City. • A separate flier will be distributed to league participants stating that no noise makers are allowed and that partici- pants /guests are requested to leave the park area quietly. * overflow parking will be signage provided directing Loma High School to avoid equestrian lot at Heritage Hillside streets. monitored by the league and participants to park at Alta parking on Vineyard and the to avoid parking on Beryl & * Sound will be checked prior to the tournament and a "lock off" device used to prevent the audio from being turned up. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. A fee of $90 will be paid in advance to cover monitoring costs. If additional monitoring is needed, it will be billed at $10 an hour. Announcing will be limited to: General welcome introduction of teams Announcement of player to the plate Recap of runs and score between innings If violations occur with regard to amplification, a warning will be issued. A continued violation may cause all amplification to cease. * Lights are to be turned off as soon as possible after the completion of the last game, but NOT TO EXCEED 11:00 P.M. 337 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING LITTLE LEAGUE TOURNAMENT Page 2 r * Citizens Patrol and /or Sheriff Reserves will be requested to be in attendance at all games. * The host little league will pay the existing electrical costs associated with the tournaments. AGREED TO BY: District 21 Citrus Little League Little League Dave Bonham, Ginny Venzor Area 1 President Administrator 533 Alta Loma Little League Dave Sievert President CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 7l TO: Mayor & Members of the City Council FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jo Lynne Russo- Pereyra,Integrated Waste Coordinator RE: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE MASCOT FOR CITY'S SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATION The Environmental Management Commission recommends the City Council consider adopting a mascot design to represent the City's Solid Waste Management Program. BACKGROUND The Environmental Management Commission reviewed the mascot illustrations submitted to the City from by the school districts, Chaffey College, youth groups, the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and the general public at their March 26, 1992 meeting. In total 13 illustrations were submitted along with two conceptual ideas for mascots. Some entries were submitted with a name. Those entries without a name or title were temporarily assigned a name for ease of reference. The following entries were recommended by the Commission and ranked in the order of the Commission's preference (Illustrations to be presented): 1. Billy Goat Recycler 2. Cucky Coyote The Commission was provided a criteria for evaluating the mascot submittals, which are not prioritized in any order of importance: Mascot Appeal - The mascot should be an animated, friendly character that appeals to both adults and children. Detail - The mascot illustration should be detailed but not to the extent that it will be difficult to reproduce. Rancho Cucamonga Orientation - The mascot should be relevant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Adaptability - The mascot should be easily incorporated into the curbside recycling program, as well as to other waste reduction programs. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE MASCOT FOR CITY'S SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS April 15, 1992 Page 2 of 2 The selected mascot design will be placed on all informational and promotional items to promote the City's Solid Waste Management Program. Some of these materials include but are not limited to, newsletters, brochures, balloons and pencils. Respectfully SubmiJted� William J. O'Neil City Engineer 1 357 - -- -- -- CITY OF RANCHO Ct'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15, 1992 TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Duane A. Baker. Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution and Apryements Relatine to Community Facilities District 88 -2 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the mayor to execute certain agreements relating to the disbursement of funds and construction of facilities in Community Facilities District (CFD) 88 -2. The agreements that are to be executed are a final disposition agreement and a flood wall construction deposit and Flood insurance fund deposit agreement. In addition it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds and approving the bond indenture, purchase contract and preliminary official statement. Background; By a previous vote of the property owners in CFD 88 -2, the District was authorized to sell bonds to fund certain capital improvements. The amount of these bonds were no' to exceed four million dollars ($4,000,000). At this time a substantial number of these capital facilities have been completed or are soon to be completed. To fulfill the purpose of this District, the time has come to sell bonds and reimburse the developer, The Caryn Company, for a portion of their costs associated with constructing the facilities. The City has been engaged in discussions with the developer for several months on the way in which to disburse funds. While a substantial portion of the facilities are complete, not all of the facilities are yet finished. While the City has agreed to reimburse for completed portions of the drainage facilities, it was felt that precautions were also necessary to protect the District and residents. For this reason, the City will be taking a phased approach to paying the developer. In the firs) phase, the developer will be paid from special lazes already collected for work already completed. From this first payment, $335,000 will be set aside in a City account to pay for construction of a flood wall required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in order to remove the flood hazard and the necessity for flood insurance from this area. To accomplish this, an agreement with a construction schedule has been drafted by Bond Counsel and to be signed by the City and developer. Also set aside from Consideration of a Resolution and Agreements for CFD 88 -2 April 15, 1992 Page 2 the first payment will be $50,000 to pay any flood insurance premiums that might be required of residents in the approximately six to nine months needed to complete any remaining work and to file the documents with FEMA for removal of the flood hazard designation. That agreement is before you at this meeting. The final agreement that is before you is the final disposition agreement. This agreement simply spells out what the total disbursements to the developer will be and provides some protection to the City against future claims. While many of the facilities are complete in the District, Caryn Company representatives will be working with the County to insure that the County is ready to accept these facilities for maintenance. This is being done to insure that the facilities are truly complete and no longer a liability to the City once we have paid for them. Therefore, no future reimbursements will occur until the issue of County acceptance has been addressed. Finally, the City has been working with our tax consultant and financial advisors to insure that the District will be able to pay the debt service on the bonds without raising the assessments of the homeowners. Our analysis shows that the District will be able to pay for the debt service on the bonds without an increase to current assessments. This has been done by adjusting the undeveloped property assessments to make up the difference needed for debt service until all of the homes proposeu for the District arc built. This District has been progressing to this point for five years. The time has now come for the District to begin to fulfill its obligation and sell bonds to pay for the facilities. The resolution that is before the City Council will authorize the sale of bonds and approve the required documents to consummate that sale. Those documents are the purchase contract with the underwriter, the bond indenture, and the preliminary official statement. Should the City Council authorize execution of the above mentioned agreements and resolution, staff will begin the process of phasing disbursement to the developer and selling bonds to fund the acquisition of the flood control facilities constructed to protect the District. Respectfully Submitted, Jerry 8, Fulwood Deputy City Manager 33l RFSOLUFION NO. c) _ / 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, XMIORIZING ISSUANCE OF ROWS, D`^ MATT G TO THE CITY MANAGER AIIII-U= TO DETER14INE T7E FINAL PRICING OF 'AM BONDS, AND APPR7VING THE FUU4 OF THE BONDS, BCND INDENTURE, AND RELATED DOWMENIS PERT ARNINO TO THE SALE AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT M. 88 -2 WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO M)CAMONCA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency "), is conducting proceedings for the construction of certain public improvements in a community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Cumunity Facilities Pct of 1982 ", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, said cnmuni.ty facilities district ]mown and desig- nated as COM9IMITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (hereinafter referred to as the "District "); WHEREAS, this legislative body has previously declared in its Resolution of Intention to issue bonds to finance said improvements, said bonds to issue pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Rcos Community Facilities Act of 1982 "; WHEREAS, at this time this legislative body is desirous to set forth all formal terms and conditions relating to the authorization, issuance and administration of said bonds; WHEREAS, there has been presented, considered and ready for approval a format of the Bond Indenture for the bonds setting forth the formal terns and conditions relating to the issuance and sale cf bonds; WHEREAS, there has also been presented for consideration by this legislative body a form of Bond Purchase Contract authorizing the sale of bonds to Store & Youngberg, the designated underwriter, which sale is to be made without advertising for bids, as authorized by section 53360.4 of the Government Code of the State of California, it being the deterination of this legislative body that such a sale will result in the lowest overall cost to the District; WHEREAS, there has also been presented a fonn of the preliminary Official Statement containing information including, but not limited to, information about the District and the type, terse and conditions of the bonds. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: RECITALS SECTION 1. That the above recitals are true and correct. 33S BOND AMIMIZAT?ON y SECTION 2. That this legislative body does authorize the issuance of the bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to erweed $4,000,000.00 pursuant to the terns and provisions of the Boil Indentures and the "Ne110-fbos Camunity Facilities Pct of 1982 ", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 3. That the execution and delivery of BM INDENIwE is hereby approved substantially in the form presented, subject to mmdifica- tiOna as necessary and as approved by the City Manager or his designee. Final approval of the Bond Indenture shall be conclusively evidenced by the signature of the City Manager or his designee upon the final Hord Indenture. A copy of the Bond Irdenture shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings and open for public inspection. SECTION 4. That the execution and delivery of the BOND nUP MM CONTRACT submitted by Stone fi Youngberg, the designated underwriter, is hereby approved substantially in the form presented, subject to modifica- tions as deemed necessary and as approved by the City Manager or his designee and with the final pricing of the bonds being delegated to City Manager or his designee. Acceptance of the final Bond Purchase Contract shall be evidenced by the signature of the City Manager or his designee. PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT SECTION 5. That the PRELIMNARY OFFICIAL STAMM is hereby approved substantially in the form presented, subject to modifications as deemed necessary and as approved by the City Manager or his designee, and execution and distribution of the Preliminary official Statement and the corresponding Official Statement is hereby authorized. The City Manager or his designee is further authorized to exeante and deliver any certifi- cate regarding the finality of the Preliminary Official Statement as nay be necessary or appropriate for purposes of complying with Section 240.1502 -12 in Chapter II of Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations ( "Rule 1502 -12 "). A copy of the Preliminary Official Statement shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings and remain open for public inspection. [UY:i�m7: MY. SECTION 6. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the District and the City with respect to the sale and issuance of the bonds are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified, and the City Manager, City Clerk, the Treasurer and any and all. other officers of the District and the City are heresy authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the District and the City, to do any and all things 339 and take any and all actions relating to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates, requisitions, agreanents and other documents, wnicy they, or any of then, may dews necessary or advisable in order to ccnsum- nate the lawful issuance and delivery of the bonds in accordance with this resolution. PASS®, APPROVED, and ADCPTED this day of , 1992. AYES: NHS: AB=: AT=: City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAM, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ranch Cucamonga, Califonua, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 1992. Executed this _ day of , 1992. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk 34a DATE: April 14, 1992 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Tarry L. Smith, Community and Park Development Superintendent CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR APRIL 15. 1992 T., A correction is required on the City Council Agenda, April 15, 1992, Item 11, regarding the Basketball Hardcourt Retro-fit project. Line 11 which reads, "The contract amount for this project is 544,097,00 ..." should be amended to read, "The contract amount for this project is $48,506.70 ..." to include a 10% contingency as recommended in the staff report. APR 141992 H YM Mr. Vince Bertoni Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Gentlemen: William and Hilda F. Hordyk 8870 San Bernardino Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 April 14, 1992 Re: 8870 San Bernardino APN 0208- 091 -72 General Plan Amend. Specific Plan Amend Subarea B Road 92 -02 92 -01 We wish to express our opinion, in regards to our above referenced property, relating to the city's proposal in General Plan Amendment 92 -02 and Specific Plan Amendment 92 -01. We agree with, and appreciate, the Planning Department Staff recommendation of DENIAL of General Plan Amendment 92 -02 and Specific Plan Amendment 92 -01, Subarea B. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUr- AMONGA TO R1FTAIN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL ZONING (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) IN SUBAREA B, FOR THE REASONS BEST EXPRESSED IN THE PLANNING DIVISION'S RECOMMENDATIONS. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED; �> William Hordyk Hilda F. Hordyk �— APR 1319$ em APR - i i r i � i �, 4 APPllCATIONS Low Subarea A Subarea 8 Subarea C I Subarea D Subarea E Subarea F Subarea G Subarea H Subarea I Subarea J aLmLw4u. cm - 8WAh GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATIONS April 52 LAND USE AL Alternatim Considered ♦ Original Staff Recommendations 0 City Council Action Existing Designations ✓ Planning Commission Recommendations District wu aac OOU I.. Im MULTIFAMILY ZONING STUDY GENERAL CITY W COMPARISON VICTORIA DU COMPARISON 'I- - --- - - - - -M7 VI'MRIA I / ✓al VIRORIA 4 /6/92 MMULTIFAMILY MSINGL£FAMLV —J snnc �cnc xucu loco 0 ETIWANDA DU COMPARISON M... 1/1 /lI CIl WAN 111 /�l MMULTI.AMIIY G'lJ ANaU TAMIL! l �I .ael._uu arr l•i.e: a,ervexA�arr vc«n. CIA I,l1'. r'AM.!Y �3SIYaiiL !'AMII.Y VICTORIA DU COMPARISON 'I- - --- - - - - -M7 VI'MRIA I / ✓al VIRORIA 4 /6/92 MMULTIFAMILY MSINGL£FAMLV —J snnc �cnc xucu loco 0 ETIWANDA DU COMPARISON M... 1/1 /lI CIl WAN 111 /�l MMULTI.AMIIY G'lJ ANaU TAMIL! GENERAL CRY (SOUTH) OPTIONS Subarea Acrea a Current Land Use Dwelling units Staff Recommendations Dwelling Units Planning Commission Recommendations Dwelling Units Alternatives Dwelling Discussed Unite A 5.71 Medium 67.09 Medium 67.09 Medium 67.09 Low - Medium 37.12 8 1.84 Medium 21.62 Medium 21.62 Medium 21.62 Low - Medium 11.96 C 13.12 Medium 154.16 Low - Medium 85.25 Low - Medium 85.25 Low 28.05 D 8.63 Medium 101.4D low - Medium 56.10 Med +um 101.40 Low 28.05 E 8.02 Medium 94.24 Medium 94.24 Medium 94.24 Low - Medium 52.13 F 4.95 Medium 58.16 Medium 58.16 Medium 56.16 Low - Medium 32.16 G 19.07 Medium 224.07 Medium 224.07 Medium 224.07 Low - Medium 124.00 H 12.14 Medium 142.65 Medium 142.65 Medium 142.65 Low - Medium 78.91 1 18.56 Medium 218.08 Low- Medium 120.64 Low- Medium 120.64 Low 60.32 J 10.91 Medium-High 220.93 Medium 128.19 Medium 128 I.S.P. H.O. 0.00 Totals: 102.95 1,302.40 998.01 1043.31 452.72 Density Calculations 62.5% of Density Range) Medium -High: 20.25 D.U. /Acre Medium: 11.75 D.U. /Acre Low - Medium: 6.50 D.U. /Acre Low: 3.25 D.U. /Acre SF 261.99 SF 205.89 SF 452.72 MF 736.02 MF 837.42 MFO Revised 4/7192 Existing Multiple Family Development As of January 1, 1991: r TOTAL r - - D.U.'s Percent Apartments 6,597 75% CooslTownhomes 2,156 25% Totandl - - 8383 Gaval CRY D.U.'s Percent Apartments 5,223 729/6 Candos7Townhomes 2,028 28% Total - 7,251 - Etlwnda D.U.§ Percent Apartments 328 100% CondosfTownhomes 0 d/6 Total 328 Victoria - D.U.'s Percent Apartments 0 W. Condos /Townhomes 0 0% Total D DWELLING UNIT DISI RIBUTION Original Distribution At Build -Out As of January 1, 1991: CtiY TOTAL D.U.'s Percent Single Family 33,558 60% Multiple Family 22,747 40% Total - $6,305 - t #anarai city D.U.'s Percent Single Family 24,186 71% Multiple Family 9,966 29% Total- - 84.152 - Ettwonds - - D.U.'s Percent Single Family 3,905 55% Multiple Family 3.164 45% Taia1 - - 7 589 Victoria D.U.'s Percent Single Family 4,073 52% Multiple Family 3,726 48% Total - 7,799 Current Distribution At Build -Out, P. C. Recommendations, As of April 6, 1992: February 26, 1992: CITY TOTAL CITY TOTAL D.U's Percent D.U.'s Percent Single Family 34,825 64% Single Family 35,068 65% Multiple Family 19,613 36% Multiple Family 19,080 35% Total - - $4,438 Total 54,148 - Galwral City. - General City D.U.'s Percent D.U:s Percent Single Family 24,186 71% Single Family 24,429 72-% Multiple Family 9,966 299/6 Multiple Family 9,433 28% Total:- - -34,162 - Tofal 33,862 Ettwends D.U.'s Percent Single Family 4,678 75% Multiple Family 1,551 25% Total - .6 ,229 Victoria D.U.'s Percent Single Family 4,567 67% Multiple Family 2,205 33% Total - 6.712 Revised 4/6/92 PFR 15 '92 17:22 P.00kFIED DEVELOPMENT 714 2481384 P.2 April 15, 1992 w Mr. Duane Baker CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON A Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: C.F.D. 88 -2 Dear Duane: Rockfield Development Corporation has been involved in the coordination and discussions regarding the C.F.D. 88 -2 reimbursements to the Caryn Development Company for those costs required to upgrade the flood control facilities and would now formally state that we are in concurrence with the City that these reimbursements are valid and necessary. We also understand that Caryn and the City have preliminarily agreed to utilize these reimbursed funds, totalling $335,000, for the construction of the Wardman- aullock Road Flood Wall Retrofit, which we understand shall provide benefits to the entire C.F.D. 88- 2 development area. We concur with the use of these reimbursed funds and with the method of funding these reimbursements, specifically, that the Undeveloped Land Tax shall be increased to provide the appropriate funding for these reimbursements. Please contact me if you should require any further information. Sincerely, ROCKFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION /vim 'Jr 'yt� Marc F. McAlpine Director of Project Development 30200 Rancho V16)0 Road VA • San Juan CapiSL•arno. CA 92675 • (714) 240 -5819 1ANN5 April 13, 1992 Mr. Duane Baker City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 RE: CFD 88 -2 Dear Mr. Baker, Please let this letter serve as Lyon Communities /Akins Associates notice to the City of Rancho Cucamonga of our strong opposition to the funding of any additional flood control facilities for CFD 88 -2. As you know I have attended several meetings at the City on behalf of Lyon /Akins, at which the Caryn Development Company has attempted to have the Wardman Bullock cut off wall retrofit reimbursed by the CFD. The latest scenario was to have the undeveloped land tax make up the shortfall to reimburse this particular facility. As I can appreciate the City's and the Caryn Co.'s desire to get these issues resolved and the bonds put to sale, I don't agree that the largest undeveloped property owner (Lyon /Akins), who is neither required to have this facility nor denies any substantial benefit from it, be party to effectively fund its construction through a higher undeveloped land tax. Lyon /Akins, whether in attendance or not at any City Council or other meeting in which the above referenced facilities are approved for reimbursement, reserves its right to any and all remedies available to them. Respectfully, AKIN EVELOPMENT COMPANY Donald T. Stahlin Vice President of Project Development DTS/dp cc: Jerry Fullwood, City of Rancho Cucamonga Rick Gomez, City of Rancho Cucamonga DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA JAN SUTTON states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the Deputy City Clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on at .3 l S n,yi I posted a true and correct copy of the meeting agenda dated Q /�/�� a —�' g y� at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. I declare under penalty of perjury that the �_foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on ._ t-I LMT.!/ 17 at Rancho Cucamonga. DEBRA J. ADAMS, CMC, CITY CLERK City of Rancho Cucamonga BY: Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga O C�: C.A 14 CITY OF RAVC7KJ CUGAMONC.A CITY 1�C(X�iNUL ^� liz ti��LNnA 1977 JOSN'T MEET N,�,C City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Chino Basin Municipal Water District April 22, 1992 - 7:00 p.m. RAINS CONFERENCE ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call: Buquet_, Alexander_, Stout_, Williams_, Wright_. tIY11111111Y17Plu OF DISCUSSION UPDATE BASIN DISCUSSION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (WMi EMPHASIS ON RP-4) 2. OF , N N MUNMEAL WAIER DISI&LaAEQULATIONS 3. DISCUSSION ON RECLAMATION STUDY (EMPHASIS ON RP-4) Z. '•:• 4N .a U71J IN a 1117-PAIPIAT L1 .r -Q C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC IC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council, Stale law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included ant he Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subesequent meeting, Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda - 2 - April 22, 1992 1, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true,+ accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 17, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.