The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992/05/06 - Agenda Packet411 CITY COUNCIL 1 AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. May 6, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 .s: City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Duyuet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember s» Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989 -1851 0 City Council Agenda PAGE May 6, 1992 1 r All items submitted for the City Council Agenda most be in writing. The deadline for submitting theta items is 5sOO p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clark's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout Williams _, and Wright _. B. ARROONCE)MU61PREBURTATI0A8 I. Preeentation of Proclamation to Rachel Bolduc for her quick action in saving her co- worker. 2. Introduction of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department-9 Bicycle Enforcement Team. 3. Presentation to the City council for Awards Received from the American Economic Development Council for Marketing and Promotions Sxcellence. C. COMMUNICATIONS EM TAX PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and not the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. COMSENr CALEIIDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noo- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one ties without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Cnuncilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Hinutees April 1, 1992 (Wright absent) April 15, 1992 (Wright absent) April 22, 1992 ( Buquet, Wright absent) City Council Agenda PAGE May 6, 1992 2 + 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 4/15/92, 4/22/92, 1 and 4/29/92; and Payroll ending 4/9/92 for the total amount of $1,298,938.34. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sala Beer & Wine 17 Eating Place for China Garden Restaurant, Ri Yin Zhao, 9770 19th Street. 4. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the ^NOtace 19 Inviting Bids" for the 1992 Tree Planting Program, to be funded from SBA Grant, Account No. 124- 4637 -6028. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -132 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLEAR TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to extend Comcaet'9 Cable T.V. Franchise. 24 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -012H 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 6. Approval to appropriate $160,683.26 from Deferred 26 Revenue Fund (87- 13901 -7907) to the Redemption Fund (37- 4637 -7920) to call bonds within CFD 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage District). 7. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 92 -031) between the 27 City and Alta Loma School District for use of Deer Canyon and Carnelian Elementary Schools for summer Day Camp Programs. Agreement includes reimbursement of utility costs. 8. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of 30 Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights -of -Way at the southwest corner of Calaveras Avenue and dinth Street between Julia Guttero and the city of Rancho Cucamonga. City Council Agenda PAGE May 6, 1992 3 ' RESOLUTION NO. 92 -133 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA GUTTERO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 9. Approval to accept Lien Agreement as security for the 32 completion of on -site grading activity for Conditional Use Permit 90 -37 (Foothill Marketplace), located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between I -15 and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -134 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT AS SECURITY FOR THE COMPLETION OF ON-SITE GRADING ACTIVITY FROM FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE SAME 10. Approval of Maps, execution of Improvement Agreement, 40 Improvement Securities, Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Tract Map Noe. 14407 and 14407 -1, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -135 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14407 AND 14407 -1 _ City council Agenda PAGE May 6, 1992 4 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -136 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 14407 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -137 U4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 MR TRACT NO. 14407 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -138 47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 MR TRACT NO. 14407 -1 il. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 51. Tract 12870, located on the northeast cornea of Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Daly Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -139 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 54 Tract 13273 - Pedestrian Undercroesing, located on Milliken Avenue south of Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewin Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -140 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13273 - PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING City Council Agenda PAGE May 6, 1992 5 13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 57 Tract 13898, located on the northwest corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue, submitted by Mizrahi and Say. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -141 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 1389B 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 60 Tract 13930, located on Wilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue, submitted by Hix Development. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -142 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY MR TRACT 13930 15. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 6u Notice of Completion for Tract 11734 Milliken Avenue Medians, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Roulevard and Mountain View Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 58,113.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -143 i5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE MEDIANS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 16. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 66 Notice of Completion for Tract 13565 - NWD Landscape, located on the ecuthweat corner of Crescents Way and Ridgeline Place. Release, Faithful Performance Bond $271,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 27,100,00 E61 1�1 �J City Council Agenda May 6, 1992 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565 - NND LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 17. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for MDR 88 -19, located on the south aide of Arrow Route between Red Oak Street and Vincent Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $150,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR NOR 88 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 18. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for the Construction of Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $222,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS MR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AM SUMMIT AVENUE 19. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notica of Completion for the Improvements located on the East Side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $144,500.00 6 67 68 69 70 71 72 City Council Agenda PAGE May 6, 1992 7 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -147 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 20. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for 74 Tract 11734, located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway. Release: maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 18,240.00 Maintenance Guarantee Cash Bond $ 600.00 21. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the Interior Tract Streets in Tract 13304, located on the 75 northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 10,538.00 22. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 9192, located on the northwest corner of 75 Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $101,936.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Dr) $ 67,448.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Block Nall) $ 53,456.00 23. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the Undergrounding of Utilities for Parcel Map 11030, 77 located on the east aide of Haven Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 61,660.OG 24. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Report and Setting a Public Hearing for June 17, 1992 to levy the Annual 70 ( Assessments and approve the Preliminary Engineer's Report for park and Recreation Improvement District (PD- 85). City Council Agenda PAGE May 6, 1992 B o RESOLUTION NO. 92 -148 78D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85) AND SETTING A TIRE AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING THEREON RESOLUTION NO. 92 -149 78- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85) 25. Approval of Preliminary Engineer'a Reports and Setting 79 a Public Hearinq for June 17, 1992 to levy the Annual Assessmente and Approve the Engineer's Reporta for Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -150 799 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREST LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION 10. 92 -151 79C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 26. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting 80 a Public Hearing for June 17, 1992, to levy the Annual Assessments and Approve the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and S PAGE City Council Agenda .( May ti, lYYZ I RBI 9 y RESOLUTION NO. 92 -152 SOB A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992)93 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACS OF 1972, AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 92 -153 '.GE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AM 8 E. CONSENT ORDIMANCES The following ordinances have had public bearings at the time of first reading. Second readings an expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clark will read the title. Any ites can be revved for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 81 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Development Districts Map as described below: 1. Prom Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low- MOdium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas: F. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The City Council will also concider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Con=i8sion recd nds approval of Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27. PAGE City Council Agenda ' y "- 1 riny 6, 1992 �L-l�l,'i�•l(-J) 10 + ORDINANCE NO. 494 (second reading) ei AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA F, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNC 208- 291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items Dave no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. a. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE UJ ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORNWATER PERMIT IMPLE NTATION AGREEMENT, SANTA ANA REGION PAGE City Council Agenda May 6, 1992 11 r I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have bass requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. DISCUSSION OF LIBRARY MASTER PLAN (Continued from April 1, 1992) J IDENTIlICATION OF ITEMS PON NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM TBN PUNLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Conmcil from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 1, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 50953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. April 1, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reaular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 1, 1992, in the council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II (arrived 7:O4 p.m.), Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad 9u11er, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Miki Bratt, Associate Planner; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer; Betty Miller, Associate Engineer; Jim Martin, Plan Check Coordinator; Jim Schroeder, Building Inspector Supervisor; Jim Thomas, Building Inspector Supervisor; Phil Mosley, Counter Plane Examiner; John Thomas, Sr. plane Examiner /Pisa; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Capt. Bruce 2einer, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adana, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Pamela J. Wright, who was recuperating from surgery. E. ANMOVNCEMEMTSlPRESEMTATIOMS B1. Presentation of Proclamation Deeignating April 1992 as "Prevent a Litter Month" in Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Valerie Card, President of Rancho Cucamonga Friendship for Animals. B2. Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 1992 as "California Earthquake Preparedness Month." Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager. city council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 2 Ms. Higgins mentioned there would be an emergency drill to take place this coming Saturday at 1:00 p.m. in the 6200 block of Opal Avenue. She invited anyone interested to attend. B3. Presentation of Proclamation to Declare April 13 through April 17, 1992 as "Rancho Cucamonga Building Safety Week." Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to John Thomae, Jim Thomas and Phil Mosley of the Fire Safety and Building and Safety Departments. The staff invited everyone to come to "Building and Safety Day" to be held at City Hall on April 15 at 6:00 p.m. B4. Presentation of Proclamation proclaiming April as "Community Services Month." Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Joe Schultz, Director of Community Services. H5. Presentation of Proclamation to the environmental Management Commission chairman designating the Month of April as "Recycle Month and earth Month." Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Jack Williame, Chairman, Environmental Management Commission. B6. Jack Lam, City Manager, requested that Item GS be continued to the April 15 meeting, but asked that when this item comes up on the agenda that the public hearing be opened and continued. He stated with respect to Itam 02, that this matter has been resolved with the property owner and asked that the item be removed from the agenda. He asked that there be an executive Session in order to approve an agreement on Item G2. James Markman, City Attorney, felt Item G1 could be resolved prior to the next meeting. Y • ♦ e Y Y C. COMMUNICATIONS IRON Tog n1rallic No communication wag made from the public. R • R ♦ Y R D. CONaeNT C \LIU±DAR D1. Approval Of Minutes: February 19, 1992 (Buquet absent) March 4, 1992 D2. Approval of Warranter Register Noe. 3/16/92 and 3j25/92j and Payroll ending 3/12/92 for the total amount of $932,894.66. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 3 D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Rochester Avenue Street Improvements, located from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue, and Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Installation Project at the intersection of Highland and Rochester Avenues, to be funded from the following Accounts: TDA, Article 8, 12- 4637 -9101; TDA, Local Measure I, 32- 4637 -9111; Systems, 22 -4607 -9108; and RDA, 11- 50100. RESOLUTION NO, 92 -078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED FROM VICTORIA PARR LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING INSTALLATION PROJECT AT THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUES IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 04. Approval of appropriations within the Special Districts funds for a total of $43,360.00. D5. Approval of Resolution authorizing issuance of 1992 Refunding Special Tax Bonds applicable to Day Creek Community Facilities District 84 -1. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF 1992 REFUNDING SPECIAL TAX BONDS, DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THE FINAL PRICING OF THE BONDS, AND APPROVING THE FORM OF THE BONDS, BOND INDENTURE, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE SALE AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS ALL ON BEHALF OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1, AND AUTHORIZING A RESTATED AND AMENDED LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT RELATED THERETO D6. Approval to execute contracts with Bruce Hull and Associates (CO 92 -018) for Appraisals and Joseph Janczyk Evans of Empire Economics (CO 92 -019) for Market Absorption Study related to Community Facilities District 91 -1. D7. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. I for Professional Services Agreement with Norris- Repke, Incorporated (CO 91 -058), Haven Avenue Improvements, Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, to be funded from Measure 1, Account No. 32 -4637 -9027 for $22,520.00. D8. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Agreement for Postponemwnt of Recordation of Covenante, Conditions and Restrictions, Summary Vacation of a Drainage Easement and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Tract Map 13298, located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Development Company. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13298 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 13298 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NO. 13298 RESOLUTION NO. 92-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT D9. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 14486, located at 9874 and 9892 Arrow Route, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Cedar Villas, a California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND FINAL RAP OF TRACT NO. 14486 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH CEDAR VILLAS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 14486 City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 14486 D10. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. I and 4 for Tract 14365 located south of Mountain View Drive and West of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO, 14365 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NO. 14365 D11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10246, located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Hillside Road, submitted by JCR Development. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10246 D12. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13351 -1, located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 9,900.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 900.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13351 -1 AND AUTHORISING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 6 D13. Approval to accept Improvement., Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13738, located at the southwest corner of Sapphire and Almond Streets. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 474,000.00 Faithful Perfomance Bond (Storm Drain) $ 588,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 47,400.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Drain) $ 58,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13738 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). E1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIROMMMRi ASSESSMENT AND INDnSTUTAT. 9PECIPIC PL AMENDMENT 92 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend Figure I1-7, and Figures IV -1 through IV -19, regarding certain trail locationa. Debra J. Adame, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 488. ORDINANCE NO. 488 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, AMENDING FIGURE II -7, AND FIGURES IV -1 THROUGH IV -19, REGARDING CERATIN TRAIL ROUTES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 488. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL a g FNT AND ETIW NDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01 - CITY OF sa - A proposal to amend Figure 5 -18 and Figures 5 -20 through 5 -40 regarding certain trail locations and to amend Article 5.33.200 regarding Community Trails. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 489. city Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 7 ORDINANCE No. 489 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, AMENDING FIGURE 5 -18, AND FIGURES 5 -20 THROUGH 5 -40, REGARDING CERTAIN TRAIL ROUTES AND AMENDING ARTICLE 5.33.200 REGARDING COMMUNITY TRAILS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 489. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). R R R R 1 R E3. CONSIDERATION OF ACTIONS RELATING TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91 -1 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 490. ORDINANCE NO. 490 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 490. Motion carried unanimouely, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). F ADVERTISED PUBLIC B.EMINOS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03 - U.S HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Co izsion's decision recommending denial of a request to amend certain development standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (Continued frow March 181 1992) Staff report presented by Steve Hayes, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout re- opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Charles Schultz, Reid S Hellyer, stated they are requesting the City Council approve the Plan Amendment as proposed by staff, but that the Vesting Tentative Map go back to the Planning Commiaaion for further analysis. Councilmember Williams asked if there was any time frame for this project, and would they come back with a redesign. Mr.. Schultz stated they would if the Plan Amendment was approved. He stated they do realize they will have to come track with a redesign. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 8 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Noe. 491 and 492. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWAMDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03, A REQUEST TO AMEND CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 491 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT FROM 10,000 TO 8,500 SQUARE FEET FOR 8.12 ACRES OF LAND ZONED LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN HTIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF MILLER AVENUE WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100- 041 -09, 1100- 081 -12, 1100 - 171 -01 AND 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100- 141 -01 AND 02, AND 1100 - 191 -01 ORDINANCE NO. 492 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWAKDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT FROM 10,000 TO 8,500 SQUARE FEET FOR ALL PROPERTIES ZONED LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL SOUTH AND EAST OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY WITHIN THE ETIWAUDA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance Noe. 491 and 492 for April 15, 1992. Councilmember William. stated that two weeks ago she was willing to reduce the parcel size. She stated she did not think U.S. Hanes would be willing to change the design of the project. She added that after further investigation on her part, she does not see a good faith move on the developer's part, and was taking away her support for the smaller lot sizes. Mayor Stout stated he is not in favor of this amendment. Councilmember Alexander stated he supports the approval of the project. Councilmember Buquet stated he is still in favor of the amendment, but realized there were still a number of issues to resolved. He stated he appreciated U.S. Homes honesty about informing the Council that they will eventually sell the project. He felt a quality project can still came out of this. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 9 Mayor Stout stated his position has still not changed since the last meeting. He asked the Citv Attorney how to proceed with this matter since it was apparent there was a tie vote on this matter. James Markman, City Attorney, stated unless the developer waives some time lines an the map, there would be acme problems with time running out on the Vesting Tentative Map. He felt if the developer would waive the time lines, it would allow the fifth Councilmember to listen to the tapes regarding this matter and then come back for a vote for all five Councilmembers. He stated unless the developer will waive the time lines, he would suggest the Council deny the appeal. Mr. Schultz, Reid and Hellyer, stated they would waive the time limits in order to wait for Councilmember Wright to return, but would also like to make a presentation when she returns. Mayor Stout stated that in the meantime, they go back and work on the Vesting Tentative Map and do the things they say they would like to do. James Markman, City Attorney, suggested that it be part of the record that the developer is waiving time limits presently to act on the Vesting Map as it is now presented to the Council, that they intend to take it back to the Commission with the Council -a direction, that the Council continue the hearings on the Ordinances before them to 7s00 p.m., on June 3, 1992 in the Council Chambers, and direct the Vesting Map be sent back to the Planning Commlasion with modifications agreeable to the developer, and hopefully to come back at the same time. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquat that the Etiwanda Specific Plar Amendment be continued to June 3, 1992 to be heard in the Council Chambers. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission -a decision denying the proposed tentative tract map and design review for the development of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of the Devore Preeway, and west of East Avenue - "N: 1100- 041 -09, 1100 - 081 -02, 1100 - 171-01 and 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 and 12, and 1100- 191 -01. Related Pile: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89 -03. (COatinued free Narcb 18, 1992) Staff report presented by Steve Hayes, Associate planner. See above portion of item for public hearing discussion. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14211, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE city Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 10 MEDIUM AND LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8 -14 AND 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APE: 1100- 041 -09, 1100 - 081,12, 1100- 171 -01 AND 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 AND -02, AND 1100 - 191 -01 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE DESIGN REVIEW OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 14211, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 226 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 81.2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE MEDIUM AND LAW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (8 -14 AND 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDS OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100- 041 -09, 1100- 081-12, 1100 - 171 -01 AND -13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 AND -02, AND 1100- 191 -01 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet that the Vestrng Tentative Tract Map be returned to the jurisdiction of the Planning staff and Planning Commission for appropriate consultation and negotiation, and for this item also to appear on the .Tune 3, 1992 agenda. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). ♦ R • R R f F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOHT FOR SPECIFIC 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -038 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA - A public hearing to comment on the draft final environmental impact report prepared for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. and General Plan Amendment 90 -03B to prezone approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence to provide for 3,613 single- family dwelling unite on 2,112 acres of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parks, an equestrian center, and preservation of 4,442 acres of open apace generally located north of Highland Avenue (State Route 30), south of the San Bernardino National Forest, west of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Marlene Trunnel, 10112 Bel Air, Montclair, from San Bernardino Sage Friends and Pomona Valley Greens, stated they support Rancho Cucamonga'¢ annexation of North Etiwanda and will work towards that goal. She added she thinks the EIR in fragmented. They asked for the preservation of all habitat north of the utility corridor. She also presented a letter which in on file in the office of the City Clerk which contains her comments. city council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 11 Joe Decist, 28516 Wisteria Lane, Highland, stated it is his understanding that this area is on an earthquake fault. He felt there should be an in- depth study regarding seismic conditions that might exist in this area. Stacy Thompson, 133 Brooks, Claremont, stated it is apparent that the County does not care to preserve this area that is in the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence. She continued to quote various information from the FIR. She also entered a written statement as part of the record which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Dan Culney, 6729 Hermosa, commented on the fault zones for this area. He also commented on the need for open apace and stated he supported thin matter. Don Stahlin, 5 Park Plaza, Irvine, stated he was an owner of property in this area and that because of economic conditions, it is stopping their project from going forward approving their final map and building their homes in the area. Greg Corub, 13926 San Dimas, felt if someone does not want the property to be developed, they should purchase it and not develop it. Leenna Rlippstain, commended Miki Bratt for her work on this project. They asked that the City take measures to preserve the land. She also presented a map to be included as part of the record and made comments about it. She continued to comment on the endangered species and how they should be preserved. Her written comments are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Michael Phillips of Laguna Beach, stated he would like to encourage that the land be preserved and asked that the City Council consider this. Glenn Black, 1644 Humbolt, Ontario, commented on the letter the City Council received today from the Department of Fish and Game, and read various portions from it. He stated he did not approve of staff'. recommendation of the documents. Billy Schwarz, 1051 E. 4th 120, Ontario, stated she supported the work that Stacy Thompson is doing. She felt the sage should be preserved. Scott Rittenhouse, 1550 N. Hobart #112, Los Angeles, stated he is a Planner in the Los Angeles area and made comments on the SIR. He did not feel this was in compliance with CEQA. He also presented written material which is on file In the office of the City Clerk. Mayor Stout questioned his figures and the information he presented. councilmember Buquet also questioned the information he presented and pointed out that he and Mayor Stout are very sensitive to this area. Mr. Rittenhouse continued to give his comments against this plan. City Council minutes April 1, 1992 Page 12 r Councilmember Alexander stated even though annexation probably won't occur, the City would still like to have a plan in place that is a good plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this EIR is consistent with CEQA regulations. 1R RR RR Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:20 p.m. with all Councilmembers present (Wright absent). Richard DuCurtis felt this should go back to the County. Mike Daniels, of Fontana, felt the City Council should go on record and set an example by stopping the rape of the land. Dunkle Stepkey, of Claremont, agreed with Stacy Thompson's comments. He felt whatever can be preserved should be preserved. He felt the annexation should occur. Jim Clark, 6826 Etiwanda Avenue, stated residents were concerned about this even before the City was a City. He stated his family owns a portion of this land. Chris Paula, 34 Executive Park, Irvine, Caryn Company, felt Rancho Cucamonga should not go forward with this plan. He mentioned various correspondence he entered into the record. He specifically mentioned the University Crest project and stated they would continue to Work with the City on this project, but asked that modifications be made to the plan. Debra Webster, 14786 Summit, stated she feels strongly when someone tells her what she can or cannot do with her property. Richard Douglas, Landmark Company, read a statement into the record which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Cynthia O'Lare, of Pomona, member of the Greene, stated she did not think it was acceptable to approve the plan. Robert Pont, 621 Berlin, Ontario, felt the City Council should show concern for Cucamonga Canyon. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Alexander stated he supported staff. Mayor Stout mentioned all the worked that staff has put into this project, including commission meetings and all the responses that have been prepared to the letters the City has received. He felt staff has done an excellent job. He felt this plan should be approved, but stated that like any plan, an amendment can be made to it. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 13 r Councilmember Williams felt this was a good plan to attempt to do what the City wants to accomplish for this area. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -092. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). + R . - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to recommend approval of a General Plan Amendment to provide consistency with the draft Etiwanda North specific plan, prezoning approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence to provide for 3,613 single- family dwelling units on 2,112 acres of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parka, an equestrian center, and preservation of 4,442 acres of open space generally located north of Highland Avenue (State Route 30), south of the San Bernardino National Forest, west of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. See above portion of item for public hearing discussion. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90 -03B, AMENDING THE LAND USE AND CIRCULATION MAPS, AND REVISING VARIOUS MAPS, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92- 093. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). R R R CONSIDERATION OF ENVIROWAKM S PE FCC PJM 90 -01 - C= OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to recommend approval of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, prezoning approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence to provide for 3,613 single - family dwelling unite on 2,112 acres of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parka, an equestrian center, and preservation of 4,442 acres of open apace generally located north of Highland Avenue (State Route 30), south of the San Bernardino National Forest, west of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. Staff report presenteJ by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. See above portion of item for public hearing discussion. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 14 r Debra J. Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 493. ORDINANCE NO. 493 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 90 -01, THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Stout to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 493 for the April 15, 1992 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ISSUANCE OF A NE ATIV¢ DECLARATION FOR THE PRO DRAIN AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET Staff report presented by Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED HAVEN AVENUE STORK DRAIN AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -094. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). F4. CONSIDERATION CF EMMIRONMUM72X ASSESSMENT AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED HAVEN AVENUE STORM DRAIN AM STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND WIDENING PRATECT BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROA_ AMP BASE LINE ROAD EAST AND WEST OF HAVSN AVENUE Staff report presented by Mike Oliver, Sr. Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 15 r RF.SOi.OTTON NO e9 -nQC A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED HAVEN AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND WIDENING PROTECT BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD AND BASE LINE ROAD EAST AND WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -095. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). F5. CONSIDERATION OF 9ONMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT E GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 1992 193 AND RELATED AMENDMENTS TO THE CHAS - The adoption of the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and the Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant Application for Fiscal Year 199£/93, based on a grant of $551,000.00, and related Amendments to the Comprehensive Housing Strategy to allow the Funding of Public Service Activities. (THIS ITEM TO BE CONTINUED TO APRIL 15, 1992) MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue the item to April 15, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). f i R R# R METE M, G1. CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY POR LARK DRIVE P O -K-ITS EXISTING EASTERLY TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE - Public hearing of protests regarding eminent domain action to acquire public right -of- way for Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue at the property commonly known by Assessors Parcel Number 227 - 011 -13 (a vacant lot) for the construction of street improvements across the Bouth property line of said property. (Continued free March 10, 1992) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to continue the public hearing to April 15, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). # /r R R ♦ # City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 16 y G2. CONSIDERATION OF _ y '- -' ^ - C ---- n kyuLj.. -- ni- eux JhiV9 FROM IT'S ahloTlnG EAb..a i ,;,41NUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE AND THE SOUTMWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AlnNUE AND ROCHESTE$AV&NUE - Public hearing of protests regarding eminent domain action to acquire public right -of -way for Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue and the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue at the property located at 11681 Highland Avenue (APN 227 - 011 -09) for the construction of street improvements across the south property line of said property. (Continued fro,a March 18, 1992) James Markman, City Attorney, asked for an Executive Session to discuss the purchase of the property described as listed for this item. The Council recessed to Executive Session at 9:54 p.m. The meetin^ was called back to order at 10:00 p.m. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is an Easement Acquisition Agreement which settles the matter for Item G2, and along with that a letter dated April 1, 1992 to Devito Francesco clarifying the agreement. THEREOF (RESOLUTION OUT NEEDED) MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buque[ to approve the Acquisition Agreement. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). R. cur NANAOER'S STAFF REPORTS MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue Stem H1 to April 15, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). R ♦ f ♦ ♦ H2. CONSIDERATION OF PI W PP POLICY Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council were: City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 17 Cynthia Shelley, 7988 Henbane, stated she had read an article in the Lou Angeles Times about Adopt -A -Wall, which gave her the idea of how to cut coats to have graffiti reproved so that it would free up money to go towards something else. She stated she would like to keep Rancho Cucamonga clean. She stated they will take a small area first and then expand the program to go throughout the City. Liz Salazar, 7978 Henbane, designed T- Shirts to be worn while the people are removing the graffiti. She also presented a poster for advertising the program. councilmember Williams stated she is impressed with the program and felt it would take off throughout the city. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI - GRAFFITI PROGRAM REFERRED TO AS RANCHO CUCAMONGA'$ ADOPT -A- WALL PROGRAM MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -096. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). R♦ R t t R I1. UPDATE ON MOBILE HOME ORPINMCZ ANU AUTMQRIZ4TION TO EXECUTE LETTER O AUTHORIZATION (00 92-0971 WITH AGAJANIAN Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the agreement with an Ordinance to come back at the May 6, 1992 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright). r. K _., Councilmember Williams stated that April 5 - April 11 is Library Week and that was why she brought this up. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, gave a brief history of the development of the Master Plan. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public torment. There being no response, public comments were closed. City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page IS Couneilmember Williams stated that at some point, the City needed to withdraw from the County system and not up a municipal system. Further discussion took place as to taxes that are paid into the County system and the service the City receives from them. Councilmember Williame felt the City needed to 'grow up- and help to provide the service to the residents that they deserve. Councilmember Regent felt it would be beet not to totally withdraw from the County system, but to figure out the per capita tax that is being generated that is currently going to the county from Rancho Cucamonga, and then approach the County and tell them we want to put that money directly into services in Rancho Cucamonga, aad that if they can't provide that amount of service, to turn the money back to the City and we will provide the service. He felt this would lead to an orderly transition. Mayor Stout stated he agreed with Councilmember Buquet's approach and then move on with other measures. He stated the City needs to know what the County's plane are for future services to Rancho Cucamonga. He felt it was time that the City run the Library itself. Councilmember Buquet agreed. Mayor Stout suggested the City Manager draft correspondence to the Library in accordance with the direction that the City wants a financial accounting and that we want to know what their plans are for provision of services in Rancho Cucamonga for the future, that the City wants to know if they plan on increasing the services to the amount of revenue collected from Rancho Cucamonga residents, and to let them know the Council will be discussing this further at its meeting of May 6 and needed their input by that date. Jackie Bold& suggested there be an assessment charge for a better library in order to help out. ♦ f R R f f J1. councilmember Buquet announced the city council would be getting a memo about today'a Caltrans /Omnitrans meeting shortly. R f R R R R R. CoMMMICATIORR FROM TRR PVBLIC No communication was made from the public. R R R R R R City Council Minutes April 1, 1992 Page 19 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). The meeting adjourned at 10.44 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: April 15, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 15, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were CouncilmemDere: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, city Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Tarry Smith, Park Planning /Develgpment Superintendent; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Cindy Norris, Associate Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer; Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer; Jo Lynne Russo - Peyrera, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickay, Management Analyst i; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce 2einer, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. Absent was Council.member: Pamela J. Wright, who was recuperating from surgery. al. Presentation of Proclamation to Kelley Abbott, Danny Salazar, Mike Newcombe, Joe Underhill, Jerry Powder, and Ernie Kopasz for their efforts in apprehending a kidnapping suspect, Mayor Stout presented proclamations to Kelley Abbott, Danny Salazar, Mike Newcombe, Joe Underhill, Jerry HOwder and Ernie Kopasz from the Police Department. Mr, and Mrs. Rodriguez thanxed all those involved for their quick action. $2. Presentation of Proclamation to Bertha Gomez for courage and heroism in saving and protecting her granddaughter from a vicious dog attack. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 2 Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Capt. Bruce Zeiner of the Police Department, who accepted it on behalf of Mrs. Gomez, B3. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing April 26 through May 2, 1992 an Volunteer Blue Ribbon Week. Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Susan Mickey, Management Analyst 1, who coordinates the City's volunteer program, who in turn passed out blue ribbons to the Council. 54. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing the Week of April 20, 1992 as Community Development Week. Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Cindy Norris, Associate Planner. B5. Mayor Stout announced the building and Safety Department was holding their first annual open house in the lobby of the City Hall that evening until 9:00 p.m. C COMMUNICATIONS FRO" TEX PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. • R fi R ♦ 1 D. CON88NT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, announced that the amount in Item Dll had been corrected. D1. Approval of Minutes: March 18, 1992 (Wright absent) March 26, 1992 (Wright absent) D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 4/1/92 and 4/81927 and Payroll ending 3/26/92 for the total amount of $1,367,154.35. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule an of March 31, 1992, D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Eating Place Caterer's Permit for Backwaters, Backwaters, Inc., 10877 Foothill Boulevard. D5. Approval to Destroy Records and Documents which are no longer required as provided under Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 3 D6. Approval to amend Revolution No. 92 -077 regarding the transfer of ownership and control of DCA Cablevisicn's Franchise Agreement. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -077P. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO DCA CABLEVISION - DICKINSON CALIFORNIA.. - ARIZONA ASSOCIATES LTD. (DCAA) TO RESPECTIVELY DCA CABLEVISION, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND MARES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. D7. Approval of Funding for a Materials Recovery Facility (MEH) Study in an amount not to exceed $34,000.00 to be paid out of the San Bernardino County's Trust Fund, Sub Object No. 020, Fund 545. D8. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the proposed Assessment District 84 -2 Storm Drain Replacement at Northern Terminus of Hermoea Avenue Project and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2 STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT AT NORTHERN TERMINUS OF HERMOSA AVENUE PROJECT D9. Approval to summarily vacate a portion of 8817 Strang Lane, located east of Carnelian Street north of Hillside Road and release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement requested by Gary and Janine Thompson. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUNRARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 6817 STRANG LANE "SOLUTION NO. 92 -100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM GARY AND JANINE THOMPSON DIO. Approval of Map and acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Parcel Map 13693, located on the north aide of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue, submitted by Steven R. Luna. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 13693 City council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEVEN R. LUNA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME D11. Approval to appropriate Account Number 26- 3900 - 9109 /REVENUE and Account Number 26- 4532 - 8768 /EXPENDITURE for the 1989/1990 Roberti- Z'Berg- Harris Grant to augment existing funds appropriated for Basketball Hardcourt construction. Approval to award and execute an agreement (CO 92 -022) to construct the Basketball Hardcourt Project, which includes construction of basketball courts at Church Street and Windrows Parke, with Terra -Cal Construction, of Baldwin Park, California. The contract amount for this project is Wlf"Morfprml pitlb Y4i',�sE;ifgea£ to be funded from Account Numbers 31- 4532 -8810, and 26- 4532 -8768. D12. Approval to execute Agreement (00 92 -025) for Swimming Pool operation at Alta Loma High School for Summer 1992 to allow City to operate lessons and recreational swim programs at high school for a weekly rental of $1,284.00. D13. Approval to approve rent accord agreement (CO 92 -014) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Pines Mobile Home park. D14. Approval to execute Amendment to Contract (CC 91 -053) with NSS /Lowry for tax and financial consulting for CM 88 -2. Amendment is not to exceed $6,000.00, and is to be paid from Account No. 75 -4130 -6028. D15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Security for a Traffic Signal for Parcel Map 12263, located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Kenyon Way, submitted by Hughes /Lyon /Milliken Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR PARCEL MAP 12263 CIS. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Public Improvements in conjunction with the Rancho Cucamonga High School, located on the west aide of Rochester Avenue, South of Highland Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCXHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY MR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 5 D17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13440 located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Nay and Lark Drive, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13440 D18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13566 -1 and - 3, located on the south aide of Sunmit Avenue between Hardman Bullock Road and San Sevaine Road, submitted by The Caryn Company, RESOLUTION NO. 92-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY MR TRACT 13566 -1 AND -3 D19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 11030, located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Lewis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 92-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TENS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11030 D20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 11410, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Highway. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $252,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 25,200.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11410 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D21. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13275, located on the north side of Highland Avenue 1200 feet seat of Haven Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 5,200.00 City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 6 y D22. Approval to accept the Construction of Master Planned Storm Drain Noe. 4N, 4P and 40 Improvement Project Assessment District 86 -2, Contract No. 87 -041, located at Haven Avenue and Nineteenth Street as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO. 92 -109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN NOS. 4N, 4P, AND 40 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -2, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D23. Approval to accept the Monte Viet& street Improvement Project, Contract No. 91 -006, located east Of Eastwood Avenue as complete, release bonds and authorize the city Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion.- RESOLUTION NO. 92 -110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MONTH VISTA STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar a. corrected. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent) . El. CQNSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPErIFIC PLAN 90-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to recommend approval of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, prezoning approximately 6,840 acres of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence to provide for 3,613 single- family dwelling units on 2,112 acre. of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 park., an equestrian cantor, and preservation of 4,442 acres of open space generally located north of Highland Avenue (State Route 30), south of the San Bernardino National Forest, went of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 493, ORDINANCE NO. 493 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 90 -01, THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Ordinance No. 493. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 7 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there has been a request to remove Item G1 from the agenda because a settlement has been reached. Fl. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMRNT B nrr GEAiIT APPLI ATIGN - FI SC YEAR 1992/93 AND RELATED AMEND - The adoption of the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and the Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant Application for Fiscal Year 1992/93, based on a grant of $551,000.00, and related Amendments to the Comprehensive Housing Strategy to allow the Funding of Public Service Activities. (Continued from April 1, 1992) Staff report presented by Cindy Norris, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council were: Rristina Bulik- Hocum, Executive Director of the West End YWCA, stated she would like the Council to reconsider staff's recommendation about not funding their youth teen program. She felt it was an important program that benefitted young teen girls in the area. David Tate, Boy Scouts of America, Old Baldy Council, also requested Council to reconsider staff's recommendation about not funding their request to take 20 low income boys from the area on a week long retreat. He felt this would help them form positive attitudes about themselves, and perhaps steer them away from gangs and drug use. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed Councilmember Alexander stated it is always difficult to have to choose from applications when all are good programs, and even though the programs presented tonight were worthwhile, there were not enough funds available for everyone. He asked if staff's recommendation were approved tonight, could changes be made in the future. Cindy Norris, Associate Planner, stated that if during the year it looked like all of the funds were not being utilized, staff could come back to Council to modify the plan. Councilmember Buquot stated though he was sympathetic with the groups that spoke tonight, he felt it was important to point out the difference between the groups .elected and those not selected. He stated those organizations selected relate directly to the provision of shelter, both in emergency situations. He stated the reason they are probably funding these two groups this year, when they have always funded actual projects in the past, is because of the direct relationship to the provision of shelter and housing. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 8 councilmember Williams concurred that there were never enough funds to go around, but felt the provision of shelter was an absolute criteria of this progrw , and commended staff for their hard work. Mayor Stout stated the Community Development Block Grant program was an ongoing project, not just a single year project. He stated they have invested those funds in what are considered lifesaving and public safety types of areas. He stated they have invested in Northtown, and are currently working in Southwest Cucamonga to improve the quality of life for the residents that live there. He stated the funds are not guaranteed, since they torte from the Federal government, so they have tried to invent them in projects that will have the greatest impact over the longest period of time on the community in cage they are not available in the future. He understood that the service groups that approached them for funding were worthwhile and would like to fund them if funds were available, but they are not at this time. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY (CHAS) TO REVISE THE ONE -YEAR ACTION PLAN AND TABLE 4/5A TO ALLOW FUNDING OF SUGGESTED PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES IN THE 1992 -93 FISCAL YEAR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Noe. 92 -111 and 92 -112. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent(. F2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE EQUESTRIAN CENTER USAGE POLICIES COST RECOVERY - HERITAGE PARK EOUESTRIAN CENTER Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, who stated there was a correction on page four of the policy, that item number five should read "the p.a. system use will be permitted between the hour. of 8:00 a.m. to dusk, Monday through Sunday, unless otherwise approved by City Council." mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Bob Westerman, 10154 Sun Valley, preeident of the Alta Lome Riding Club, felt the most important aspect of the policy was the use of the community room at the center, and that an equitable solution had been reached. He urged the council to accept the proposed policy. city Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 9 There being no further commente, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Buquet stated the Council Subcommittee spent a tremendous amount of time on this and felt they have come up with a plan that will work, that it resolves the issue of compatibility between different users, but still remains flexible. RESOLUTION NO. 91-1948 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91 -194 TO INCLUDE USER FEES FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES AND RENTALS MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 91- 1946. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). F3. CONSIDSRATION OF ENVIRONMEMTA ASSVSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02 CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Nap as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard west of the Cucamonga Creek. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. B. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Avenue. The Planning Ccs iesion recommends denial - APN: 208 - 091 -36, 56, 57, and 72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the west side of Hermon Avenue, mouth of Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commiaeion recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: Portion of 208- 321 -24. D. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential 12 -4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Coamiaeton recommends denial - APN: 207- 591 -21 through 35. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 10 S. For 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenut, The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 through 23, 27, 26, 37, and 38. F. For 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrons Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. G. For 19.07 acres of land located on the went side of Cucamonga Creek, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommenda denial - APN: 207- 211 -01 and 31. H. For 12.14 acres of land located on the west aide of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard, The Planning Commission recossmende denial - APN: 207 - 211 -06 and 36. I. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Cosmisafon recommends approval of Low- Medium Residential (4 -e dwelling unite per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential 18 -14 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subarea: J. For 10.91 acres of land located on the north aide of Civic Center Drive on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel. The City Council will also consider including this property in the Haven overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 208- 331-24 through 26. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSRSSMPNT AND FOOTHILL BOL 8VA_D SPECSFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01 - AMQWcA - A proposal to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 5.71 acres of land located in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard west of the Cucamonga Creek, The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 211 -18 through 21, 32, and 34. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 11 B. For 1.84 acres of land located in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnalian Avenue, The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 208- 091 -36, 56, 57, and 72. C. For 13.12 acres of land located in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on the west aide of Hermosa Avenue, South of Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: Portion of 208- 321 -24. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. CONSIDRRATION OF XMVIH0jWNTM ASSOSSMSNT AM 2MI 2P NT DISTRICT ?MNDMS 92 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Development Districts Map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low- Mediem Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 8.63 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) an an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 591 -21 through 35, B. For 6.71 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 through 23, 27, 28, 37, and 38. C. For 4.95 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207- 262 -01 through 05, 38, and 39. D. For 19.07 acres of land located on the west aide of Cucamonga Crack, north of Arrow Route, approximately 600 feet South of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 23.1 -01 and 31. R. For 12.14 acres of land located on the want side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends denial - APN: 207 - 213 -06 and 36. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 12 F. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27. 2. From Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subarea: G. For 10.91 acre. of land located on the north side of civic Center Drive on the east side of the Deer Creek Channel. The City Council will also consider including this property in the Haven overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APM: 208- 331-24 through 26. The Planning commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. Staff report presented by Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner. Mayor Stout asked if the Planning Commission only looked at residential applications. Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner, stated the main focus was to look at lowering density. He stated in the past there have been instance. where a developer has submitted an application for consideration of commercial use, which was reviewed by the Planning Commission, and approved by the City Council. Mayor Stout stated that no other options were considered then at this time than residential. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they did not do an exhaustive analysis of commercial or office /professional, they looked at the redeeignation of residential uses, and as in previous actions before the Council or Commission, those applicants wishing to investigate other uses were encouraged to submit a separate application outside of this process. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Lois Lightner, resident mince late 1950's and property owner in Subarea D. felt her property would only be conducive to apartments in that area, which has always been her long term plan to build there, and asked the Council to support the Planning Commission's recommendation for Subarea D. Bob Lightner, resident, also asked the council to support the Planning Commission's recommendation to leave Subarea D as Medium Density. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 13 Steve Cable, 11405 Anzio Court, President of Watt Homes and representing the property owner of Subarea IA and 1G, stated they concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to retain the current density for the property. He stated they are also in the process of submitting plane for review for medium Density housing for these sites, which will also include affordable housing consistent with the city's affordable housing strategy. Greg Bennett, representing six property owners in Subarea I, stated they would like to see a portion of that Subarea developed as Community Commercial or Neighborhood Commercial. He felt it would be suitable due to the proximity to other commercial developments in that area. He felt commercial development would meet the Council'B goals of reducing multi- family density, and lower the impact on traffic and schools, while also increasing revenue. He presented information and elides regarding the location of the property and why they felt having residential right next to the Mobil station would negatively impact that business, as opposed to having a commercial development next to it. He felt that staff had only prepared a recommendation based on residential designation without looking at other possible options. Robert Hoffman, representing Mr. Hobert Kidder, an owner of property in Subarea I, stated Mr. Kidder had purchased his property in the 1970's with the intent of putting in some type of commercial development there one day. He stated they were told they could bring in an application for a development, but then they would have to show who would he leasing in the development, and felt that businesses would not commit to that if they were not even aura if the zone change would be approved. He stated he would like some type of feel on whether or not the Council would approve a zone change to commercial. Jan Graeber Abbott, property owner in Subarea I, stated she did not want to see that property zoned for commercial, and neither several homeowners to the north who spoke at the Planning Commission meeting. She stated she has lived in her home for 17 years, and felt that there was an opportunity to improve that area. She stated she was in favor of the Planning Commission's recommendation because there Would be more opportunity to provide something with lasting beauty that would benefit the community. She did not feel they needed another commercial complex there. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Williams stated she concurred with the recommendations from the Commission. She stated that for Subarea I, she saw that as an opportunity for a good mix, that it did not necessarily have to be designed where a house would be right next to the Mobil Station. She stated keeping it zoned residential did not preclude anyone from approaching the City about a zone change if they had a good plan for other uses. She stated she was not comfortable with the idea of changing the zoning to commercial at this time when there was no specific project in mind. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 14 r Mayor Stout stated he had a problem with Subarea J. He felt that property was very important to the City, and felt the Haven Overlay should be extended to at least the Day Creek Channel, if not beyond even, so that a major project designation could be put in that location. He felt that by designating the center portion as residential, it would give the wrong message to someone who might want to develop that property. He stated he would like to see some type of designation for that corner that could allow some special things to be developed there in the downtown portion of Rancho Cucamonga. His suggestion would be to withdraw Subarea J from consideration and ask staff to look at that whole area with something different in mind other than the traditional types of zoning. He stated the City would not have another opportunity to have a downtown where there was this much vacant land available to do something special with. Councilmember Buquet stated he concurred with the Mayors suggestion for Subarea J. He stated that in regards to Subarea 1, he did not think it would take $150,000.00 investment before the City would consider a zone change as was suggested earlier. He stated he supported the Planning Commission's recomendation ae an interim land use designation, and if someone came in with a high quality residential or commercial project, he would be willing to consider it. Mayor Stout stated that corner was a difficult piece, what with the size of the property and the existing development around it. He stated they had a similar situation with a parcel on Archibald, north of Base Line, where the developers wanted it rezoned from office /Professional to Commercial. They realized that Office /Professional was difficult for that parcel, and that too much commercial would be a problem, but there was a need for something special because of the senior housing adjacent to the parcel. He stated they were able to work out a development agreement for that site that met everyone's needs. He felt if there was some type of special designation on the corner of Arrow and Archibald that the City would consider some type of mixed use or optional type of development, it would let people know they would be flexible about what type of development would be allowed there. Councilmember Buquat stated he did not know if a special designation was needed on that corner. He felt they could make the current change in the zoning since no one was waiting to develop that property right away. He stated the owners were not even ready to invest in a preliminary plan for a quality project. He felt when a project was ready they could consider making a zone change then. Councilmember Alexander stated he would be in favor of the Planning Commiasion's recommendation for Subarea J. Councilmember Williams concurred. Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 494. City Council Hinutee April 15, 1992 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW -MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -18 THROUGH 21, 32, AND 34 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW -MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 14 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-211 -18 THROUGH 21, 32, AND 34 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA B, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW -MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 1.84 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND CARNELIAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208 - 091 -36, 56, 57, AND 72 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA B, TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW -MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 1.84 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND CARNELIAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 091 -36, 56, 57, AND 72 City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 16 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA C, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) MR 13.12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 208- 321 -24 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA C, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND US$ MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MSDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 13.12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN, PORTION OF 208- 321-24 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA D, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW -MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 8.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 591-21 THROUGH 35 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA A, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS NAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 8.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 207 - 591 -21 THROUGH 35 City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 17 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -121 A RESOLUTION OF TITS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA E, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BARER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNi 207- 201-01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 THROUGH 23, 27, 28, 37, AND 38 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA B, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS HAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -S DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6.71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 201 -01, 03, 06, 07, 13, 20 THROUGH 23, 27, 28, 37, AND 38 RESOLUTION MO. 92 -123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA F, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE NAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 4.95 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MADRONE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207 - 262 -01 THROUGH 05, 38, AND 39 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA C, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 4.95 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MADRONB AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 262 -01 THROUGH 05, 38, AND 39 City Council Minuteu April 15, 1992 Page 18 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA G, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 19.07 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CUCAMONGA CREEK, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211-01 AND 31 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA D, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 19.07 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CUCAMONGA CREEK, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211-01 AND 31 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA H, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE NAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 12.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -06 AND 36 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA E, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 18 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO L.DW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 12.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 600 PENT SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207- 211 -06 AND 36 City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 19 y RESOLUTION NO. 92 -129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, SUBAREA I, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.37 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208 - 291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27 ORDINANCE NO. 494 (firat reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA P, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) MR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208 - 291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27 QhLIFURNIA APPROVING GRNR� P� AMENDMENT 92 92, "SZORMT 8.3d 9991 R MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by august to approve Resolution Noe. 92 -113 through 92 -129, and to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 494 and eat second reading for May 6, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 20 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to withdraw Resolution No. 92 -130 and ordinance No. 495, and that Subarea J be returned to the Planning staff and Planning Commission for examination of a new designation in keeping with the comments made by the Council tonight of something other than residential, and in keeping with the downtown area of the City. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). O. VUBLIC BEARINGS Nil PeArRoby li"e of said 1=4 SM340VED FROOK AGENDA H1. CONSIDERATION OF TFMPOR.ARY VARIANCE of FILD LIGHT HILL AND HERITAGE PARES - Request by District 21 Little League to extend light usage on both baseball fields for the month of July. Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Director. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public conmente. Addressing the Council was: Dave Bonham, Area Administrator for Little League, presented changes they have made in the schedule to move up starting time in consideration of the neighbors. He stated this is the start of the Little League World series tournament, and asked that the Council approve the 11f00 p.m. curfew for the light variance on the two 60 foot fields. He stated the Little League tournament rotates through the district every four years. He stated the second part of their request deals With the 90 foot field at Red Hill Park, which is for a Big League Section tournament lasting five days. He was asking to have a variance to allow the lights until 12:30 a.m. even though they did not expect any games to go beyond 11:30 p.m. Mayor Stout asked what was the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation on the Big League tournament. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 21 Dave Bonham, Little League, stated they recommended the lights be out at 11:00 p.m. He stated if they could not get a variance for 12:30 a.m., they would have to hold the tournament somewhere else. Councilmember Alexander asked if correspondence had been sent to the surrounding residents about the 12:30 a.m. curfew. Dave Bonham, Little Leaque, stated not by their group, but it was his understanding that the Community Services Department had sent notices out about the possibility. He stated if they were not able to hold it here this year, it would rotate around again in a few years. He stated they have never hosted a Big League Sectional tournament before, but wanted to try to Bee if they could. There being no further response, the public comment section was cloned. Mayor Stout stated he did not mind approving what has been done in the past, but he did not want to allow a 12,30 a.m. curfew. He felt if someone aloe could hold the tournament this year, they would have the facility ready at the Sports Park by next year and could possibly host the Big League tournament then. Councilmember Buquet disagreed. He felt it would be a remote possibility that they would need to actually continue a game until 12,30 a.m., and felt it would be beneficial to show off our community and the quality of our fields to people from other areas. He stated because of the benefit the youth would receive by playing in their community, he Would be willing to allow the variance. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to adopt the recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission to allow a light variance to 11:00 P.M. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 ( Buquet no, Wright absent). H2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROI'v MArCV j POR 20H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA SOLID WASTE MANAGSNENT PROGRAM - The Environmental Management Commission recommends the City Council consider adopting a mascot design to represent the City'o Solid Waste Management Program. Staff report presented by Jo Lynne Russo- Peyrera, Integrated Waste Coordinator. Councilmember Buquet stated he liked the coyote figure, but felt they needed to change the name. He stated he would like It to have a name that was generic or non - specific and did not refer to any one community within the City. He felt that might create some controversy between the three communities and wanted to avoid that. Councilmember Williams concurred that she also liked the coyote figure, but would like to see it have a name that did not refer to one of the three communities. ACTION: The Council concurred to use the coyote figure f } R f City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 22 H3. CONSIDERATION TO EXECUTE A FINAL PAYMENT AGREEMENT !CO 92 -0201 AND A DEPOSIT AGREEMENT ICO 92 -0211 AND TO APPROVE A RrSOLITION APPROVING CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF BONDS FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BB 2 (Continued from, April 1, 1992) Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the Council were: Don Stahlin, representing Lyon Community -Akins Associates, stated they are the largest undeveloped land property owner in the District, and referred to his letter that was handed out to the Council. He stated their opposition was not in the initial agreements set up with Caryn Company in the amount of approximately $3.1 million, but with the $300- 400,000.00 additional payment that is going to be made. He stated the difference is being made up in the undeveloped land tax rate aseesement, and felt if that facility was needed, it should have been put in and siz, d for and everyone should have shared in the cost equally, including the existing property owners. He thanked Jerry Fulwood and Duane Baker for keeping the property owners informed of the issues and always being available. Mike White, Standard Pacific, 1565 MacArthur Blvd., Costa Mesa, stated they were in support of this item am, one of the major landowners in the north Etiwanda area. He felt the land owners would receive benefit from these facilities, and urged the Council to approve this action so the remainder of the north Etiwanda area can proceed with development. Kevin Pohleon, Caryn Company, clarified the reimbursement requested from the City is for upgrades the Caryn Company has spent on flood control facilities that are part of the original purchase and finance agreement. He stated the reimbursements and upgrades are not tied to the flood wall itself. He stated they are doing a separate agreement to utilize the $335,000.00 to build the floodwall. He felt there have been substantial cost benefits to all the properties out there from the work they have already done. He also thanked staff for their support. David DiIOrio, Caryn Company, also thanked staff for their help on this project. There being no further input, the public comment section was closed. Councilmember Buquet stated staff did a good job in pulling this all together. He stated he has seen many time before where people have come in wanting to develop property where there is no infrastructure in place, and the first one does not want to pay for it, and the following people do not want to pay their proportionate ehdre. lie stated while he can respect the comments made that it should have been done a long time ago, at moms point in time you have to bite the bullet and pay for it, and that was where they were at now. He felt the only answer would be to not allow people to build in areas where there was no infrastructure unless they were willing to pay for it. Mayor Stout stated another consideration was to protect the residents that live In that area. City Council Minutes April 15, 1992 Page 23 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF BONDS, DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THE FINAL PRICING OF THE BONDS, AND APPROVING THE FORM OF THE BONDS, BOND INDENTURE, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE SALE AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92 -131. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent(. • • • • x R I. COUNCIL B0I9688 No Items Submitted. No items ware identified. • f R 1 1 • R. COMMUNICATIONS FROM T86 PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. R • R • • 4 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss property acquisition and personnel matters, and at the conclusion of the Executive Session to adjourn to the Joint Meeting with the Chino Basin Municipal water District on April 22, 1992 at 7:00 p.m., in the Rain. Conference Rope of the Civic Center. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wright absent). The meeting adjourned at 9135 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: April 22, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adknrmed loin[ A1cctmta Rancho Cucamonga City Council and the Chino Basin Municipal Water District An adjourned joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and the Chino Basin Municipal Water District was held on Wednesday, April 22, 1992, in the Rains Conference Roma of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:OE p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout Absent were Councilmembers: Charles 1. Buquet II, who was on his way from Orange County, and Pamcla 1. Wright, who was recuperating after surgery. Also present were: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director: Joc O'Neil, City Engineer; and Jan Sown, Deputy City Clerk. Present from Chino Basin Municipal Water District Board of Directors were: John Anderson, Bill [fill. Anne, Dunihuc, and Pmsident Dwight French. Also present from Chino Basin Municipal Water District were: Tom Homan, General Manager; Vincent De Patina Jr., Manager of Engineering; Ed James, Water Resources Director; Gary Hackney, Planning Department Director; Harlan Delzer, Finance ,g Budget Department; Karen Stinson, Public Information Officer; Paula Barron, Executive Assistant; Edna Morasse, Board Secretary: and Michelle Iauffer, Recording Secretary. � ` i7iF91J YCtl177:[11:Y:�i�✓I�i 6'YI;IC�ii6'iDa'l�' Ton) Horner, Gencral Manager, stated they would like to reacquaint the City with what has Mien happening with their 10-year plan, Re slated they felt they had a good system of communication with the various cities in the West End, and with Cicnmr +nea County Water District in our area. City Council /China Basin Municipal Water District Joint Meeting Minutes April 22, 1992 Page 2 Gary Hackney, Planning Department Director, presented a diagram showing the boundaries for the Water District. He stated RPI and RP2 were currently on line and provided treatment for the District, and pointed out their service areas. Ile stated the Carton Canyon plant, which is the first treatment plant they have built, is starting up now. He stated the addition of RP3 in Fontana and RP4 in Rancho Cucamonga will help to divert some of the flow from BPI, and will help to even out service requirements. He stated the IC-year capital improvement plan is a dynamic document, and it changes yearly in response in the growth rate. He showed a chart for RP and its projection of Flow, and explained how RP3 and RP4 will help to suibilize BPI at its current capacity of 4 million gallons per day. He stated this particular program was fairly aggressive, and the cost for it approaches SI billion over the 10- year period. Councilmember Alexander asked if the projected completion of RN in 1994195 included any potential changes in the economic conditions, or has that affected their estimated completion date. Gary Hackney, Planning Department Director, .stated the project has been delayed for a number of reasons, but also because the growth forecasts were down. Mayor Stout asked if they would have the capacity in the future that if one of the plants were to go do, it could be shifted to another facility. Gary Hackney, Planning Department Director, stated they do not plan for that level of redundancy, they plan on everything tieing filled up when they are on -line. Mayor Stout asked what would happen if one of the plants had in be shut down due to an emergency, such as an cutfquake. Vincent DePalma, Manager of Engineering, stated the plants are designed for redundancy in the structure, that all of the plants have stand by power and are designed to withstand earthquakes, and do not sustain very much structural damage. He sated they hme emergency holding basins on site to hold contaminated water until it can be treated. rrsrs♦ B2. pj$�{(S$IQ\ QSHI \O BASIN MUNICIPAL WATFR DISTRI RATIONS Gary Hackney, Planning Department Director, explained how regulations for nitrogen standards and ammonia reduction to protect aquatic habitat were affecting the District. He felt that these regulations would introduce an additional S60 million in costs in the 10 -year capital improvement plan. Dwight French, President, stated the reason they are being regulated to reduce their nitrogen amounts is because the water is going dot nstrram as the water supply for (range County. He stated the ammonia reduction regulations arc to maintain the water supply for animals that live in their discharge, which are only there hecmtse of their discharge. He stated the regulations they are Icing asked to meet are the same as If you were in Tahoe discharging inut the Truckee River. Councilmember Alexander asked if Orange County was paying for any of these mgulations and improvements Dwight French, President, stated they are net paying anything at the current time. Mayor Stout asked if they knew how much per household the W million would average out to be Bill Hill, Director, stated it was $1.92. City Council /Chino Basin Municipal Water District Joint Meeting Minutes April 22, 1992 Page 3 Councilmcmber Alexander asked if (here was any way to collect a pro rata share from Orange County since they are the main beneficiary of this. Dwight French, President, stated the only way to get them to oay would probably be when they were able to have a more aggressive reclaimed water program, then Orange County would probably be willing to pay for their water. Mayor Stout stated one problem is that agencies often do not inform the public, as to what affect these regulations will have on them. He fell if the public really understood how their rates arc being affected by wrtain regulations or requirements, they might not weep, it that Wstsjust naturally go up every year, without knowing the reason why or if there is anything they crm do about it. Tom Homan, General Manager, stated the 360 million was just one piece of meeting new regulations. He stated about a third of their 10 -year program is estimated to be required for meeting new regulations. He stated in fiscal year 198889 they started to keep track of vests in the homeowner associated with regulations. At that time their fee was S4.00/mo EDU, now it is close m 57.00 /mo EDU, and 52.00 of that was just for regulations. Gary Hackney, Planning Department Director, spoke about the Clean Water Act, and how its requirements for waste water are more stringent than drinking water standards in order to protect the habitat, and what they do to meet those regulations. He spoke about the new sludge regulations that are due this summer, and that they expect them to be more re -use oriented, which would go along with their composting project. He then went over the three local AQMD rules affecting their emissions, AB 2588 regarding volatile organic compounds, and SCAQMD rule 1179 regarding VOC and odor inventory, as well a the new roquiremer.Ls for tasting storm water run -off. Rill Hill, Director, explained about how the regulations are affecting their costs, and stated they will start listing those costs on the bills se that people will know why they are paying that amount. Mayor Stout felt it was not always the fault of the regulatory agencies themselves, it was the California LegiSlawre that creates these problems. B3. Imo' $t(LO`1 RECLAMATION CTf mV /FMppACI QN RPM Tom Homan, General %h nager, stated when the District look over RP1 in 1973, it was set up to treat 128 million gallons per day. As they have become more regulated, the capacity has dropped over the years to where it Is only processing approximately 50 million gallons per day, which was a consideration when planning to acid plants. He stated another consideradon would be that the additional plants could help them with a water reclamation program. He stated the study for the reclamation master plan for each fra.ilily was Dancing completion. Ed James, Water Resources Director, spoke about the different plans they were preparing for the mclanonam study, and that they Itofod t0 have it completed by June 1992. He showed a diagram with the consultam's recommendation for RP4, which fwu.sed on maximizing water reuse at a minimum coSL He showed a chart of potential users of reclaimed water during the initial phase. Dwight French, President, stated the water price for reclaimed water may be cheaper in the future, but their contractual arrangcmcnls require them to charge users for the treatment, and they would need to do some type of institutional type of arrangement so they could bring the price down. He stated part of the problem today is that the water that comes from RPI is owned by another agency, and in order for them to sell that water, they have to charge City Council/Chino Basin Municipal Water District Joint Meeting Minutes April 22, 1992 Page 4 for the treatment, so it Ov Or prices the water to where they just put it back in the river and let it go down to Orange County. Fie stated they have to worry about institutional arrangements with other agencies like Orange Count5 . who might not Like it favombly when Chino Basin starts pulling water out of the river. They also have to consider the Water Master and other agencies. On the analysis though, the water is considered ac Icing free water, Tom Homan, General Manager, stated that in regards to the water shortage, there has beer, nothing dnre on a statewide basis to develop a water supply for Southern California, so they will have to do what they can on a local level. The program for reclamation allows them to optimize what they have locally. The recent rains have helped Southern California, but the Department of Water Resources still rates Northern California as a critical water need, so they have only given Metropolitan Water District (MWD) half of their allocated State Water Project water. He stated their melioration project is nearing completion and will coincide with the construction of RP4. Fie then presented an update on the Water Resource Management Study which was initiated in November of 1991, the MWD conjunctive use demo study, die Chino desaltar system design, which is in slant in fiscal year 1992/93, and the co- composdng project which will be under construction in fiscal year 1992/93. He also showed charts about the nitrate concentrations in the groundwater, from the years 1960 to 20W, and went over how unless the water was treated, a large portion of the groundwater would be unusable. He stated the desalter project will be a way to dead with the nitrate problem, as well as the co composting project once they got that issue resolved. Mayor Stout asked who are the major opponents to the co-composting project Dwight French, President, stated there is one dairyman who owns property close to the proposed composting site, and the women's prison in Chino. He stated that all of the testimony from the regulatory agencies has been in their favor, but they have been tied up in court for more than a year now on this. They discussed the impacts the delay has been causing. Mayor Stout asked if they have figured out if the flood control measuma that have been built in the last Ion years have affected the basin's ability to be recharged. Tom Homan, General %tanager, stated the water resource plan will he erdumine that issue. B4. UPDATE ON W IER ISStiFS GIVEN BY MMOMIIdTAN WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR HILL Bill Hill, Director, stated MWD also has a 10 -year plan, but at a cost of $10 hillion, and as with Chino Basin, environmental regulations are the biggest cost at this dme. He stated one of the major problems is storage facilities. Ile stated MWD is trying to build a reservoir in the Riverside area, which would be larger than all the reservoirs in Southern California put together, but them is a tremendous cost involved. He also went over the environmental issues MWD is faced with in building the reservoir, He then spoke about the four pumps which have been completed for die Water Project pumping plant, and how they cannot turn all four Of them on at once be, also it creates a hackllow problem in the delta, and covered the inl pact of that. He felt the way things are currently, Ihcy might not ever get any new water from up north. He felt they would need to concentrate on conservation and recycling water in order to meet their future needs. lie spoke about how MWD will be raising their rates even though there is enough water for this year, becancc they are facing major repairs that are needed for the aqueduct system which will be spread out over ten years. He went over how new regulations can impact MWD to the point of having to add new departments to administer them. He stated MWD is doing what it can to help get all the water they can to help the local agencies, but he does not see the State doing anything to help out. He spoke about how the .solution to the pumping station problem would be to build a peripheral canal to the current one, some of the problems associated with the Los Banos Grande reservoir, measures that would need to he taken to insure that saltwater did not get into the State Water Project, and water reuse philosophy for MWD. He also recounted City Council /Chino Basin Municipal Water District joint Meeting Minutes April 22, 1992 Page 5 problems during the drought when agricultural groups approached them about buying water at whatever cost, and when MWD purchased water through the water bank for them, the growers would not purchase it because it cost too much, so MWD bad to take a loss nn iL He stated that Assemblyman Kelley from Riverside was sponsoring a bill that would bring agriculture up to the same level as residential in the MWD service area. He then spoke about the current partial and standby charges that MWD is charging it users. No items of mutual interest were discussed. C COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to adjoum to Executive Session to discuss personnel matters on April 29, 1992, at 6:00 p.m. in the De Area room of the Civic Center. Motion carried unanimously, 3 -0 -2 (Buquet, Wright absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, tan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: CITY 9F RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -15 -92 (91/92) ....................... = a................. .... au............uu RUN DATE: 041L5/92 PAbc: 1 VENCDR ..v....... NA M2 v .............................. u...... a .uu..uu............uv...... ITEM DESCRIPTION RARR NO u........ ................................. uu.............. ......... ................... NARR. AMT. v.. a....... u..... *4 CHECKS OVERLAP 321 FLORID. JJAN VOID .TALE DATED CHECK 54694. 47.52- «( 5.895 - 62130 >1> 1165 01111SIFl- IYSJ2CTIJMS VOID LEECR LOS) IN MAIL 62131. 600.00- ' <<< 62132 - 63161 »> 5312 VILLARREAL• MARIE A. EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT STORM DRSVII 63262. 1.000.00 (« 63763 - 6552T >J) 218P ASAJAAIAN c ASSOCIATES M03ILE HOPE ORDINANCE CONSULTANT 65524. 2.950.00 <<< 65529 - 65685 >>> 1211 KNOK INVOICE 19ZOZ00928 03 IWLCE A 65686 25.65 <<< 65682 - 65793 >>> 3309 SMITH, MICHELIN YOUTH BASCET54LL SCOREKEEPER A 65794 81.00- (« 65795 - 65850 >>> 744 GREAT WFSTERN SAVINGS EMP PD DEFERRED COMP /PPE 4:5192 65853. 6.757.00 3109 SMITH, MtCrELIH 13UTM BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER 65952. 33.00 :656 SOLIS• MIIUEL YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 65853♦ 48.00 919 UNITED MAY UN:TEU WAY LURCH 4121 -3 PEOPLE 65854. 54.00 3246 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL APRIL PREM GROUP AN19477 -1 65855• 59.716.60 1258 ELLIS. JANA CASH ACV. REFRESHMENTS REP MEETING 65156. 25.00 1028 SAM 6EAN CC CFFICE OF 14X COLLECTOR TAX LIABILITY APN 0225- 211 -58 1 658511 14.56 1028 SIN BERN CO OFFICE OF TAE CCLLECTOR TAX DELINQUENCIES APN 0225 - 211 -58 I 65958. 389.55 3249 SAN 8ERNARDINO COUNTY CITATION WRT55893 -5. MILLER - FINE /BL 65859• 10.00 3200 ARROYO SECG ASSOCIATES. INC- CONTRACT SERVICE THROUGH 2/28/92 65860. 11.495.00 <<< 65861 - 65862 >>> 1 A C A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.. INC. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4 6SO63 102.35 10 A L R TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 65d64 1.614.93 962 A T 0 T 714 321 - 3350 -0 65865 0.25 2732 ABC BONGED LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE 65866 35.00 3019 A6SOLUTE ASPHALT. INC. 50 BAGS PERMA /REPAIR 65.67 282.84 6703 ALLISON -RICE CONSTRUCTION REFUND DEPOSIT ON PERMIT 44921 65068 500.00 2693 AMTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CO. SERVICE FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 65869 375.00 5719 ARMSTRONG. MESTLET REFUND CLASS 46180 ROT 96291 65870 Z5.00 402 AUTO RESTORATORS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE M 65871 1.299.19 1061 AWARDS BY CHAMPION 10 X 13 PLAQUE 1 6567Z l a 41.17 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE HAND CLEANER /LAG SCREWS /WASHERS A 65813 21.60 6104 SASS, KAYLA REFUND CLASS 46152 NOT 4971SO 65814 IZ.50 32ZT BAYLESS STATI➢NERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 5 65675 422.23 1338 BIG A ALTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE A 65876 122.23 6220 HOARY ", 6RAACJN REFUND CLASS 06042 RCT 545836 65811 25.00 4361 BON A4I M x -ECU 1x. INC. PROGRESS PAYMENT 45 1 65,178 82.555.31 6705 BREA, CITY OF J09 CENTER MANUAL C VIDEO 65879 75.00 594 CALIFORNIA CASUALS YOUTH BASKET94LL SHORTS 65880 1.066.72 6206 CALIFORNIA VETERINANY OVERPAYMENT DF BUS. LICENSE 17514 65081 11.00 6707 CANFIELD, 02RRICK REFUND CLASS 46146 ACT 197137 65882 5.00 3305 CANOE PACIFIC CIRPURATIO.N VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 1643 A 65883 701.63 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGH SERVICE STREET SIGNS 65084 332.09 6398 CHAMBER OF CCHMERCE LUNCHECN J. LAM E 0. WILLIAMS 65885 20.00 6721 CHUGOHUkY. NADIA REFUND CLASS .5110 ROT 096957 65936 27 -50 { 6109 CISNEROS% NATHAN REFUND CLASS 16044 ACT .95136 65887 12.00 73 CITRUS MUTU'AS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT #328/503 65388 173.91 6225 CITY OF CLAREMONT WEST rN0 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 4/23 65381 15.00 14 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL # 65890 138.00 C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERIOD: 94 -15 -12 (91192) - ................................. ....... a u...vu...... u RUN DATE: u..................n.................... 04 115/92 F66E: 2 ....................... V2 NOOR ... ................ MAN` .......................................................................... ITE9 J25CRIPTION VARR ND ........................_....... HARR. AMT. A. ChECFI OVERLAP 591 COM.0 NICATIGh T[CHSIvU`_S REFUGE MONITOR SNITCH 65891 65.00 [,i2 COMPUSEFVC. INCLePLAATEO SERVIC "c FOR MARCH 65N92 139.31 053 1DHPJTF9LAN0 COMPUTER SUPPLIES A 65d43 4.081.57 >711 CJU3T5. JA'GN REFUND CLASS A5311 ACT 491108 65d94 ?.0 .2, '710 CRAVF"O. Mi Ri REFUND CLASS 05113 ACT 0)8095 65895 22.50 5112 CREWE., LIIC5AY REFUND CLASS 06040 ACT 496080 1 65896 16.00 I(< 65891 - 6569y JYJ 45 CUCAMONCA CC WATER )!ST 178 CU FT A 65099 3.002.11 5713 DALLAS, MICEt LLt REFUND CLASS 06250 ACT 496091 6510D 33.00 1291 DATAVAULT DATA STORAGE 65901 103.00 6722 DESERT SUN MARKETING POLICE FIRST AID BICYCLE PACKS 65902 11..37 137 OCTCO OFFICE BAJGES 6 DESK PLATE 65903 25.86 6123 DEZA, CLAUCIA REFUND CLASS 66002 RCT .98516 65904 25.00 d31 DICK. ERIC RFIMB FEE WEE BASKETBALL SUPPLIES 659D5 16.85 619 OICASES STANCARC INDUSTRIAL UNIFORF SERVICE A 65906 374.70 274 012TZ TOWING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 4648 0 65901 210.00 6714 DINEEN TRUUING, INC. DUMP FEE - BROKEN CONCRETE 65908 40.00 6144 DISPOSAL CONIRDL SERVICE REFUND DEPOSIT ON PERMIT 05174 65909 250.00 3165 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS INSPECTION OF UNIT 0516 1 0635 65910 500.00 6423 DOORILL. SUE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT WINTER 1992 65911 39T.16 6715 DYE, CARCL REFUND CLASS 06241 ACT 098106 65312 16.50 6716 DIE, CLAW REFUND CLASS 16241 ACT 49BD98 65913 16.50 r, 6111 E 1 R CONSTRLET1ON REFUND O' POSIT ON PERMIT .4393 4 65914 1.500.00 6530 EL OCRACC BANK PROGRESS PAYMENT 43 1 65915 9.172.81 118 EMPIRE CO. POLICY AM%I3024d532 . 65916 3.799.16 .118 ENCINIAS. AUSTIN REF UNO CL45S 06153 ACT 196437- 65917 13.15 6530 EUREKA INN RESERVATIONS FOR A. MARTIG 4/23 -25 65914 111.78 6530 EUREKA INN RESERVATIONS 6 SCHYIDT /L HENDERSON 65919 298.08 2121 FARE'S - RANCHO CUCAM3N5A TAPE 4 65920 103.44 123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 79081822/0 - 58431730 9 65921 42.50 3305 FELDER. JENNIFER Y. BASKETBALL S. KEEPER PPE 4/5192 65922 21.50 4738 FIEAAO. KATHY RECEIPT 96973 CLASS 5260 65923 16.50 724 FLORIO, JOAN FULL PMT CLASS 6151 65924 47.92 Id A4 FONTANA MOTORCYCLES INC. REPAIR TURN SIGNALS 0 65925 392.64 2840 FORD OF UPLAND, INC_ GUARD ASST . 65926 396.16 3405 FUN CORNER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 65927 137.47 4310 GALLAGHER, PATRICK TUITIOM1 RFIM BUR SE MENT 65923 27D.00 1444 GARCIA, AMT C04TRACT SCOREKEEPER 9 HOURS 65929 60.75 4623 GARMAN, JEININC REFUND CLASS RECEIPT 96184 6S930 17.00 2155 GIULIA, VASILS 7UITION RE I B8VRSEAENT 65931 232.04 4827 GUME2, JONATYAN REFUND CLASS BEGET 96852 65932 5.00 4826 6DM[2. VANESSA REFUND CLASS RECEIPT 96851 65933 5.00 1900 GRIFFITH RADIATOR SALES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 9523 A 65934 46.50 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 945 -5659 A 65935 111.06 2462 HARIIG, AMTXEA TUITION REIMBURSEMENT A 65936 655.50 4832 HARTUM, JASOK REFUND CLASS RECEIPT 0430 65937 3T.S0 2519 BECKETT SLAG PR'JOUCTS 3/4• CLASS TWO EASE 65338 28.89 4836 HENOERSCN. LARRY CASH ACVANCc i2 STATE PRESERV CONF 65939 100.00 1234 MOSEMAN 6L3- 6FA -4NP 4 65940 32.26 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT ASPHALT 1 65941 139.19 4834 INGALLS. JOE CONSTRUCTION PER-11 5239 6i +A2 5.0.05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FIR 1FRT00: 0. -15 -92 (91192) RUN OATc: 04/15/92 P.'F: 1 u ..................................... ................................................. .................... .............. a....... VENGDR NAME ITd4 DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARK. AHT. .... ........... ........................... ...........................4.4.4. a........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1G7 103 4424 612 .830 13, .423 115 1218 193 ii21 4.08 979 .6Z5 .000 4822 2252 4931 549 16 4928 TU7 W 4835 2198 1020 842 3412 1127 2515 4461 4492 .333 32T9 2410 2686 235 3340 2212 1626 1023 al. 2101 5640 56.9 757 2sal 5650 5651 255 2 75 1 2961 INLAND WEDIRTIJI 30109 INLAND NADIATIJN 901RD JACKSON, (ELLT GAESCMAE INC.. C.P. AABASLK, JLSiIN KAMI9„ it_InLR E UNGEIEP KANIA- LLGYG, TLOS KMART STLR.A ANDY LAIRD GONITRLCTION CL LAVERIU, SUZ.Wlc LEWIS ANC CLARK CONSTRUCTION LEWIS MOM'S EDER, KATHY M.S.A. TREASURER INLAND EMPIRE MADOOA. GARY NAILSORT, INC. MAMASII, KATHLtFk MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.INC. MARKMAN.ARCIYNSkt,1ANS0N.E KING MCADORY, EBDNEE MEAOOWS' MARK MET2GER.MICHAEL MI"AEC "S CRAFTS MOUNTAIN VIEW ..LASS _ MIRROR MOI;NtAIN VIEW SMALL ENL. REPAIR MURPHY C A"OCIATtS. P. N B I INC. NATIONAL ARBOR 34Y FOUNDATION MATIGNAL RECREATION C PARK ASSOC NIELSEN. WcTTIS NRPA PU3LICATIOK, OATIS. I..LWIRL ONTARIO, CITY JF OSBORN. AETH O.EY ELECTRIC P L 0 Ti L.NNOLO;IES PACIFIC IN RIGAfIGN SUPPLY PACT'L LELL4LAR PASENET PARAGON SUILOINiU PRODUCTS INC. PARKER, TAURUS RAYNE, ASHLEY PAYNE, JGRZANN4 PER BOYS PETERSON, LILLS PIERCE, AMY PIERCE, SWaKNCN EDNA OISTRIBLTING CO POMONA TRUCK C AUTO SUPPLY PORCU. DANIEL a0 CMECKR FAIR HOUSING MARCH PAYMENT FAIR NCUSING MARCH PAYMENT REFUND CLASS RECEIPT 9726D EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REFUND CLASS RECEIPT 96290 SERVICES FROM 2/29192- 3/JI/92 REFUND CLASS RECEIPT 97494 SUPPLIES FOR C.E.R.T. CLASSES A MAINZ ;UPRISES A UTILITY LINE EVACUATION REFUND CLASS 15110 RCT 0972DR RETENTION PAT /JAMES BROWN PROJECT REFUND DEP051T TR 13662. RC 162 0 REFUND CLASS 95334 RCT 197062 MT6- 4HTTNEY.BARNES.VARNEY,ZETTERSEC REFUND CLASS 05230 RCT 191483 WEEA ENDING 4/6/92 REFUND CLASS 05140 RCT 196262 MARCH 1992 A BEDROSIAN VS. R.C. FILE 17542 KS 1 REFUND CLASS 06120 RCT 196323 Y. BASKETBALL OFFICIAL PPE 4/5192 REF CHU CLASS RECEIPT 98 S73 MOTHERS OAT TEA SUPPLIES 1 REPAIR GLASS IN SPEED INDICATOR FILTERS B. PRENDERGAST 2/07192 1 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 4 MEMBER; NIP - DENNIS L. STOUT PUBLICATION: CONTRACT OR EMPLOYEE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT ADA SELF EVALUATION HANDBOOK Y. BASKETBALL S. KEEPER PRE 4/5/92 YOUTH TRAVELING BASKETBALL PEGISTRA A. SOFTBALL S. KEEPER PRE 415/92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONSULTANT SERVICES MISC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES .1110427164 0 A /CA74784 -C PORTLAND CEMENT, PALLET 1 YOUTH dASKETBALL OFFICIAL CLASS REFUND 15040. RCT 097668 CLASS REFUND 16040, RCT597669 MISC ALTO CLEANING SUPPLIES A SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CRAFT A CLASS REFUND 06141, RCT 136461 CLASS REFUND 06342. RCT 096462 CHEV HYDRAULIC OIL, CHEW TRACTOR FL 9T4D43 FILTER 1NSTR REP -TG HOW TO US PUPPETS TRN OVERLAP 65943 65944 65945 65946 65947 65948 65949 65950 65951 65152 65953 65954 65955 65956 65957 65958 65959 6596) 65961 65962 65963 65964 65965 65966 65961 65968 65969 65970 65971 65972 65973 65974 659:5 65976 65977 65976 65979 65980 65981 65982 65983 65984 65995 65996 65587 65986 65989 6519N 65991 65992 65 }93 506.82 755.35 15 .09 813.68 25.00 10.326.IT 5.09 560.30 192.03 9.611.31 27.50 2.272.00 3.12a.00 20.25 68.09 33.00 39.31 15.00 28.171.45 18,176.50 25.00 19.00 10.50 132.09 44.94 26.51 616.00 1.136.00 15.00 22.50 530.05 6D.00 22.00 110.00 67.50 15.39 9,679.16 1.420.83 684.94 55.50 404.03 14.50 12.00 12.00 191.61 38.9. 5.00 5.90 392_91 39.88 70.00 CITY 3F RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS F:P PERIOD: 04 -15 -92 (91/92) . . . . . . . . . . . RUN DATE: 04/15/92 P4111: 4 v u........... VEIG.R .......uu......uu.ay...... ........... . . . . . . . . . .NAME .....................................................uu........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IT-1 OESLREPTION VARR NO ................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .uv............ WARR. AMT. 9A CHECKM OVERLAP .582 POSTA..E BY 9906E RESET METER 96704057(POSTAGE) 659" r.000.U0 053 PRUULK, BRUCK2 CLASS REFUND 95040, ALT 496354 65995 30.00 65 9FU0.NTIAL G9E +ALL SU °PUT MAT 46, M3P 4250, OUST CLOTH 1830 A 65996 121.51 • «( 65991 - 6599T )» 251 R S R AUTO.C):VE 1935 FRO LTD LI NZGOPOBI A 65998 3.262.86 1890 9 l R LIGHTlb N.M. 1000 /U SYLVANIA LIGHTS 65999 201.98 11R R M A GPLOF SOEL TESTING /4 TESTS PER TRIP 66000 405.00 1654 RAMIREZ. M"YANNA CLASS REFUND 66016, RCT 097462 66001 20.00 207 RANCHO MINI ST3RAGE MAY 1)92 - OCT 1992 RENT - A62 1 66802 150.90 3343 RANCHO MUO11_f NCNES SERVICE COMPLETION BILLING- STEFANA MC MLLLM 66003 Z.Bi L.00 616 RAUL "S TIRE AND RMEELS TIRE REPAIR SWEEPER 6641 9 66904 5.50 545 R:0 .ING 596E STUB. WORK 9COT5-CARLOS ADAME 66005 119 "14 5655 BRINES. JOROAN CLASS REFUND 06140. RCT 198295 66006 5.00 112 3112 CAMCRA CENTERS 0SS INSTA -PRINT 643281 66007 9.69 5530 RTVERSIOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 803 - 407EBOOK 66008 9.12 2100 R3GEPSOH. I'EVOR 1. BASAETBALL OFFICIAL 66009 14.50 303 SAN BERN CC EMG/SYSTEMS SUPPORT INDEX LPOATES 66010 63.84 1381 SAN BERN CU ENVIRON" HEALTH SVCS. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK 66011 335.00 132 .SAN LIEGC ROTARY BROOM CO. INC 1 SET MOBIL SINGLE ROW CARBIDE OR 5 66012 393.21 2262 SCHMIDT, 86E A. EXPENSE ADVANCE FOR 1992 ST PRES CF 66013 150.00 3037 SCI0RL1N0. NICULAS '+- ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 6601.4 50.00 5664 SFPE SEMINAR CONFERENCE /SEMINAR•ENG FOR USE L ST 66015 120.00 5656 SIMPLER LIFE fMER3ENCY PROVIS CHILDRENS FIRST AID KIT 66016 35.00 SIN GCUB. NANCY CLASS REFUND 1607S. ACT.98555 66017 17.00 0$665 y 1327 SMART C FINAL E.:G HUNT CANDY /PRIZES / 66018 323.19 5657 SMITH, ANDREA CLASS REFUND #5430. RCT#97430 66019 31.50 3ZT8 50 CALIF E4153.9 54 30 127 8549 01 000 2 4 66020 1.243.09 317 S9 CALIF EC150N CO. 43 30 030 6506 01 4 66021 181.23 <<( 66022 - 66024 ») 1432 GO CALIF ECSSON- -ATTN: SHEILA LUNA 54 30 114 0007 01 000 9 4 66025 26.)42.92 2656 SOLIS, MIGLEL Y. BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 66026 24.00 5658 SOTEL], MARGIE CLASS REFUND .5160. RCT49TZ61 66027 15.00 3058 ST.T` OF CALIFORNIA UNUERGROUND STORAGE YANK FEE 66028 340.75 3352 STOEBER, ALEX YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 66029 29.00 5643 STOFA, KAREN BUILDING 6 SAFETY NIGHT- SUPPLIES 4 66D30 31.55 675 T L D INSTALLATION, INC. PINSWIIEKIS -9569 66031 7.T4 5095 TXM9LIM. SIFFAHI CLASS REFUND 05301. ACT .96043 66032 15.00 5097 TRIAL. MATTHEW OVERPAYMENT UP BUS. LICENSE 410078 66033 1.42 $659 THOMAS. AMANCA CLASS REFUND 06045, RCY095818 66034 6.00 955 TRACONEK INC. ENGR. 2945 TMP VIREO - P CABINET 0 66035 10.Z13.91 3036 TRAVERSO, LUIGI ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 66036 50.00 411 TRICO CONTROL HEA9 .1663 66037 142.75 350 U.S. ^OSTMASIER 1392 SUMMER GRAPEVINE POSTAGE 66038 4.500.00 2958 UMPS ARE uS ASSOCIATION EMPIRE SVCS -311- 3/15/92 4 66039 2.114 "75 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 10 WEEKS BILLING PAYMENT REQUIREO 66040 300.00 1330 UPLAND LUMBER CC 48^ SURVEYOR LATH 50 PC 040L 66041 18.86 5666 URIBE, SCCOFRG CLASS RcFUNO N6030, RCT4995ZI 66042 35.00 5662 VALOEZ. IRI...E CLASS REFUNO 46141, BCT497613 66043 5.00 667 VISA 4820 0059 9095 9704 A 66044 379.76 j 5660 VISIONARY PRODUCTIVITY MANUAL E PUBLICATIONS 66U45 44.00 1103 VISTA PAINT DORA GLIDE BASE "P' CONCRETE 66046 478.41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF NIRRANTS fCN 12RIO^.: 04 -15 -9Z (91/92) .............................................. ......uuu....................................... RUN DATE: 04/15192 PO4E: 5 VENDOR .........uv......uv...........................uu..........uuuue........ RIME ITEM DESCRIPTION ...............................• RARR NO .....vu...........uu.....u........ MARA. AMT. v. 00 CHECKV OVERLAP 2052 RICHER PACIFIC INC. CONTRACT SVCS- SIE29A MADRE 51 V 66041 5.501.50 5661 RAUGH, NICOLE CLASS RcFJNO 16191, WIT 196295 66048 25.00 213 VARIOUS CLEANING SUPPL- A/C331433100 66049 64.03 3080 NMITTIEN FERTILIZER SPECIAL PLANTER MIX 66050 385.15 509 XEROX C0RRLRAt10N MOaEL SB P4 /COPI°_i UU915361691 A 66051 503.03 3401 YOUTH SPECIALTIES LAMES C IDEA BOOKS 66052 96.24 2099 IAGORIN. KEITH YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 66053 14.50 3i! LEE MEDICAL SERVICE VARIOUS 1ST AID SUPPLIES 66954 381.91 5663 IEIGLER, MARY CLASS REFUNJ 06200, RCY196228 66055 33.00 4P TOTAL 9601511.59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -22 -92 (91192) RUN DATE: 04122/92 PAGE: I • ......A..•ao ••.• o•. o•••uu•uu•uuu• u. u• u•uuuu•••uuuu••• u•u•uuuu••uuuuu•.uuu••..uu.•.vu VEN004 NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION PARR NO WARR. ANT. ........•......• ..............•............... ...........vvu.................u•... A....... a........•.. •. •.................... 3039 SMERATON HOTEL 5164 STOOOARO, LIZ 643 COMPUTERIANC 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. LIST POMONA TRUCK 1 AUTO SUPPLY 5097 TREA1. MATTHEW 32*9 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 4842 1ST IMPRESSIONS 6CREEM PRINTING 3395 3N. INC. 1 A L A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.. INC. 6727 A.F.S. INC. 6726 A/C ELECTRIC 2132 ABC BONDED lOCXS153TMS 3389 AGARD. RODNEY 1135 ALIGNMENT C BRAKE SPECIALISTS 6'.24 ALL PRO FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INC. 2595 ALL SIZE SELF STORAGE 1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS 6129 AMERICAN REFRIGERATION 6730 ARIEL VERA Z6 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC 1880 BACA, CATHERINE 6057 BARTON CEVELOPMENT 2636 BAUER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 6731 BAXTER. HOWARD 3227 RAYLESS STATIONERS 2517 BERRY. WANOA 1338 BIG A AUTO PARTS 41 BISHOP COMPANY 1330 BORAL RESOURCES. INC. 6751 BOSSERMAN. CAROL 969 BOYD LUMBER 142 BRADFORD, HAROLD 6229 BRAT). MORNEEN 6132 BRIGHT NIGHT OFFICE CLEANING 6133 BROWNELL. STEPHEN 3193 BRUNICK. ALVAREZ L SATTERSBY 552 BURR- 6LACXSCMLEGER, ROSEANN 2258 C E 0 9T C P R S 6733 CALIFORNIA EMPIRE MORTGAGE 2486 CANCIMD• KATHY 3153 CAMO. DAVID A. PM CHECMM OVERLAP COMMUNITY SERVICES CONE 4/22 -4124 65192 238.00 - <<< 65193 - 65810 >>> CLASS REFUND 86086. RCTS98055 65811 10.00- «( 65612 - 65891 >>> COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1 65693 4.081.57 - <<< 65094 - 65982 ») PORTLAND CEMENT. PALLET # 659B3 404.03 - <<C 65984 - 65991 D» OT4049 FILTER 65992• 09.86- «( 65993 - 66032 »> OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 010078 66033 7.42 - «< 66034 - 66055 >>> CITATICN RTS5894 -CORR TICKET 660564 10.00 <(( 66057 - 66056 >>> OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 23399 66059 10.60 TRAINING 6 FIT TEST CASE 660.0 180.00 E QU IENE xT MAINT ENA. C F. 66061 n.a9 OVERPAIMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 12902 66062 25.50 REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 45143 4 66063 025.31 CYLINDERS L KEYS 4 66064 1LT.90 ADULT B.B. OFFICIAL 6 MRS FEE 4119 66065 90.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT #6Z3 1 66066 696.83 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 418407 66067 12.00 RENTAL OF SPACE NA64 4/1 -9/30 # 66068 564.30 ABSTRACT OF TELEPHONE QUOTES 66069 123.16 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 416229 66070 7.20 REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 44912 66071 500.00 HERITAGE PARK VINEYARD NO. OF 19TH 66072 392.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1 66073 511.63 PLAYSCMOOL INSTR AID AWNS PPE -/19 66074 66.11 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE #2506 660TS 94.94 PROFESSIONAL SVCS 30 /1- 3/31/92 66076 705.00 CLAIM SETTLEMENT 66011 127.80 VARIOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 4 66078 292.30 PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR AID PPE 4/19 66079 73.22 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 4 66000 11066.54 CREDIT INVOICE 0 66081 3.139.33 STATE 318• MAXIMUM 66082 26.67 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 66083 115.85 LUMBER 66084 51.72 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL C#5440 66085 19.20 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 66086 261.06 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 02103T 66087 14.30 REIMBURSEMENT COCA CONFERENCE 66088 26.65 BOOKING FEES 66689 82.96 INSTR PAYMENT IN FULL CL46170 /6171 66090 106.25 BAACKEIS FOR LIGHT POLE 66091 414.30 CPRS MEMBERSHIP FOR J. SCHULTZ 66092 90.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 416983 66093 100.00 PLAYSCXOOL INSTR AID 416- 4111/92 66094 200.00 EGG HUNT 3 MRS. FEE 4119/92 65095 16.50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -22 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 04/22/92 PACE: 2 ................................................................................................... ............................... VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION PARR NO WARR. ANT. v• u•.... ....................... vu•................................................. vvu.. ........................ao...... 6734 CANTEEN COFPANY 6735 CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC. 3305 CIRCE PACIFIC CORPORATION 6108 CARLISLE. ALAN 6736 CARR MASONPT. WILLIAM 6137 CASALETTIS POLKA PALACE RESTAURANT 6138 CASTANEDA. AURELIANO 6B CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 488 CHEVRON U S A. INC 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO. INC. 74 CITY RENTALS 949 CLARK. KAREN 2546 COAST ELECTRIC 6139 COLVER FANUFACTURING 643 COMPUTERLANO 3026 COROURA. ALCO 674D COSCO FIRE PROTECTION 6741 COVINGTON MOPES 6742 COLA PRODUCTS 95 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 6743 CURTIS SECRETARIAL SERVICE 239 D 4 A CONCRETE CO 6744 DAVIS. ASMLEY ETAS DIVIS. J.T. 2628 DAVIS, PORNIS 6146 DEERCREEK FINANCIAL INC. 2650 DELGADO, JOSHUA 1762 DENSON. JAMES 902 DEPT. Of TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 08 107 OETCO 6T9 DICKIES STANDARD INDUSTRIAL 274 DIETZ TOWIM6 6747 DOOGMERTY L DOUGHERTY 477 E S R I SYSTEMS, IBC. 6748 ECOLA9, INC. 1117 EMPIRE ECONOMICS 173 ESPINGLA TIRE SERVICE. BILL 2034 ESPOSITO, CHRISJINA 6749 EVENT SPECIALISTS COMPANY 4941 FACILITY SUPERVISION CO.. INC. 2121 FARR"S - RANCHO CUCAMONGA 124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND. INC. 4939 FIDELITY NAT -L TITLE INSURANCE CO. 2909 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE. INC. 4943 FINE LINES TRIM 3317 FITE. KATHERINE C. 1505 FAR COPIER 4844 FULLINGTON CHIROPRACTIC 4845 GABBY S NORTH 3153 GAVIRIA. LANCRU S. •0 CMECLN OVERLAP OVERPAYMENT Of OUS. LICENSE 05506 66096 27.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 921220 66097 90.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 0648 8 66D98 990.70 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 010078 66099 7 -42 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 621547 66100 If•19 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 6252 66101 13.60 REFUND CONDITIONAL USE PEA01192 -15 66102 660.00 STREET SIGN 66103 706.59 GASOLINE CHARGES 66104 66 -39 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 0503 6 66105 162.24 RENTAL - SNAKE DRAIN B 66106 61.84 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CL06020 66107 158.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 6 66108 81.15 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 014848 66109 26.00 CREDIT MEMO INV SAAAD62561 f 66110 521.51 EGG HUNT A MRS. PPE 4119/92 0 66111 73.75 OVERPAYMMT PLAN CK 092 -17T2 C 1773 66112 50.61 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 018139 66113 1.336.38 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 8510 66114 35.01 (« 66115 - 661t6 »> IS CU FT 0 66117 2.307.26 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 821609 6611B 10.79 MERNOSA L HAMPSHIRE 0 66119 11219.19 REFUND CLASS 06105 NOT 097891 66120 25 -00 REFUND CLASS 06111 RCT 090636 66121 12.50 ADULT O.B. OFFICIAL 3 MRS PPE 4/19 66122 45.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LICENSE 016301 66123 300.13 ADULT U.S. SCOREKEEPER PPE 4/19 66124 83.38 MILEAGE REIMS RESTRM LOCKUP 4/13 66125 101.92 CITY SHARE OF MAINTENANCE 66126 4.280.19 OFFICER BADGES G DESK PLATE 0 66127 359.86 UNIFORM SERVICE 0 66128 T49.40 INPDUNOED VEHICLE 66129 60.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 022955 66130 16.56 REGISTRATION J. HART 1 I. BLAIR 66131 11000.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 620159 66132 35.74 MARKET ABSORPTION STUDY CFD 091 -1 66133 81000.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE 9112 66134 95.29 PL&YSCHOOL INSTR 30 MRS. PRE 4/19 66135 110.20 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LICENSE #21247 66136 8.37 OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 0 20354 66137 20.00 RIB0ON3 0 66138 30.91 DVERPATMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 7503 66139 12.40 BOND PAYOFF RFNO -APN 02DI- 623 -66 66140 116.16 REMOVAL OF OIL FILTERS /RECYCLING 66141 160.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. # 13653 66142 35.92 PLAYSCHOOL AIDE - PPE 4/19192 66143 18.00 TONER. RICOH M -10 66144 42.97 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 4747 66145 24.60 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 23574 66146 8.00 ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 4/19/92 66147 100.00 C I'T OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PER1O0: 04 -ZZ -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 04122/92 PAGE: 3 ................................. ... .. •... V ENO OR ........ •..... ............................ NAME ..................... a •............. ................................ •..................... ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO ................................. uu............... WARR. AMT. ................................. MM CHECK# OVERLAY 4846 GENERAL BINDING CORP. OVERPAYMENT Of BUS_ LIC. A 21619 661.8 10.32 1994 GILMET, VIRGINIA PLAVSChQOI INS }0.UCTOR -PPE 4119/92 66149 99.40 4842 GIORGIO INC. OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 4 16028 66150 25.65 3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS. INC. MISC TREE MAINTENANCE 66151 11.155.00 1245 GONSALVES 6 SON, JOE A. MAY SERVICES 66152 2.IOU.00 6750 GORDON 6RICKEN L ASSOC., INC. OVERPAYHENI OF BUS. LICENSE 017728 66153 11.50 744 GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS EAR RD DEFERRED COMP /PPE 4119/92 66154 6.205.00 1129 GR£EMWO00'3 UNIFORMS BAND GLOVES. ASCOT, SHOULDER CORD 4 66155 53.52 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 466 -0604 4 66156 5.169.92 3416 HARMS, ELIZA E. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 66152 292.81 3021 MARRISON. AICHAEL E. ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 4119/92 66158 200.00 3152 HARRISON. MICHAEL W. ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 4/19192 66159 100.00 1833 HERCHENROEDER. LISA BUILDING COVERAGE - PPE 4119/92 66160 173.25 3020 HESSE, JOE ADULT VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL -PPE 4/19 M 66161 106.50 3408 HINSON. KEITH BUILDING COVERAGE - PRE 4/19/92 66162 162.66 831 HOLMES. SHEILA PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR -PPE 4119/92 66163 2+0.00 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES A 66164 117.46 4848 INDIAN COMMUNICATIONS OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. R 16160 66165 47.21 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 9850 MADERA - RANCHO CUCAMONGA A 86166 218.53 165 INGRAM PAPER PAPER SUPPLIES 8 66167 820.06 122 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGAL ADV. CHARGES M 66166 1.459.50 2645 INTERSTATE BATTERIES OVERPAIMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 13937 66169 5.31 612 JAESCHKE INC.. L.R. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE I 66120 1.180.56 Co 3379 JOHNSON. KELLY ADULT SOCCER SUPERVISOR -PPE 4/19/92 66171 72.00 3022 JOHNSON. VIVIAN PLAYSCHUOL AID /INSTRUCTOR -PPE 4119 66172 150.79 4240 JONES. CHRISTOPHER REFUND CUSS 4 5040 - RCT t 46603 66173 30.DO 2172 JONES. GREG ADULT 0.8. OFFICIAL - PPE 4119192 66174 90.00 1829 JWP TELECOM INC. ACCOUNT A 409D359 4 66125 182.54 4653 KATIE AC GUIRES. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. K 19971 66176 14.94 3.:1 KELLY SERVICES. INC. CLERICAL DIV.-24 MRS R $7.93 HR. 66177 190.32 3396 KELSEY, ROGER ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 4119192 66178 100.00 3179 KENDREMA, DONNA INSTRUCTOR PAT IN FULL C 16091 66179 43.20 2211 KITCHEN. JAY ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 4119/92 66180 50.00 2399 KLUSMAN. CAROL PLAYSChOOL AIDE - PPE 4/19192 66181 41.04 1471 KNAPP SHOE COMPANY ERNIE RUIZ - SAFETY SHOES 66182 84.00 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES J 66183 577.70 1024 ROCA MATERIALS COMPANY SS-IM EMUL 66184 200.90 4861 KRAFT FOOOSERVICE INC. OVERPAIMENI OF BUS. LIC. M 9526 66185 9.00 4862 L.R. JOHNSON AIR COMB. E MEATING OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. A 4276 66186 13.35 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 661ST 1.389.78 4849 LAND CONCERN LTD. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 6 13552 66188 69.96 2714 LASER PERFECT LASEYJEI I1 TONER CARTRIDGES 66189 52.00 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS. IMC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 66190 613.94 3262 LEE. MICHAEL ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 4/19/92 66191 100.00 1231 LEGI -TECH SERVICES ULRING MARCH 1992 66192 163.33 4850 LEPRECHAUN PEST CONTROL DYERPAIKENI Of BUS. LIC. V 17105 66193 20.76 2864 LIGHTNING POWDER CO.. INC. MAGNETIC POWDER FIT -C /ROTARY SLAB 66194 126.2d 2773 LIVESAI. CHUCK ADULT B.S. GYM SUPER -PPE 4119/92 66195 130.00 4851 LOGIC EXTENSION RESOURCES OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 2674 66196 220.80 292 LOGUE. SALLY PUYSC6UOL INSTRUCTOR - PPE 4/19192 66197 144.00 3023 LUNT, ARENT A. ADULT E.B. OFFICIAL-PPE 4119/92 66198 45.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -22 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 04/22/92 PAGE: ........................................................................................ ............................... VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ........................................................................................ ............................... H CHECKS OVERLAP 4314 LYON COMPANY. THE WILLIAM OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. A 10593 1 66199 2.374_00 4863 H J S PIPELINE RFNO /REINSPECTION FEE -CMRG IN ERROR 66200 30.00 4050 M.A.A.S.C. ANNUAL CONF.REGIS /D.RAKER.J.FULNODD 66201 Z1D.DU 2952 MAILSCRT. INC. WEEK FADING 4/10/92 66202 59.88 3241 MARINA CONTRACTORS. INC. PLUS RETENTION A 66203 19.489.11 2199 MC ARO4E, TRACT ADULT SOCCER SUPERVISOR -PPE 4/19/92 66204 72.00 3015 NO CALL. SUSAN PMT IN FULL -CLASS A 6046.6086.6007 66205 82.80 1125 MC GAREC MACHINE BARREL STAND 66106 161.63 4860 MC GEE ELECTRIC INC.. T. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. A 4997 66207 36.86 4852 MC MILLIAN• N.O. LOTHAR OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 15852 66208 99.50 2415 METER. CHARLIE EGG HUNT - PPE 4/19192 6 66209 79.50 749 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY APRIL -ACCT 11611- 01.1611-02.1611 -D3 66210 521.00 4859 MILES. SBANITA REFUND CLASS A 5312 - ACT 9 91453 66211 20.25 4858 MOMTOJO. LEILANI REFUND CLASS 8306-LESS 2 WEEKS 66212 39.00 403 MORTON COATINGS. INC. - SAUER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 66213 534.94 1020 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS L MIRROR REMOVE BRKM GLASS L INSTALL NEW ONE 66214 054.38 4855 MOUNTAIN VIEW POOL L SPA REPAIR OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. R 18831 66215 6.18 842 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL END. REPAIR 4 FILTERS 66216 31.68 4838 MUNOI, ESTELLA REFUND CLASS 1 6302 - RCT 898561 0 66217 51.00 875 M B S /LOWRT BOND SALE CFO 88 -2 66218 3.360.10 015 N 1 S /LOWRT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST A 88 -2 66219 4.295.06 4837 N I G P ANNUAL SVC CHRG- 5/1/92 - 4/30/92 66220 115.00 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE A 66221 345.14 2638 NATIONAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION REINS /REUSBLE SUPPLIES - SPEECH CREST 66222 36.00 4856 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CO. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 3273 66223 47.06 2440 NEWBORN, LISA BALLRDCM DANCE - APRIL 11 66224 56.50 2548 NIGRO. ANOREE' PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR -PPE 4/19/92 66225 132.58 3323 NOTES. KEVIN LIONS CTR -REC ASST. -PPE 4/19/92 66226 327.25 4318 OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 2203 66221 155.00 4857 OSAGE ROOFING COMPANY, INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 8 1475 6622B 35.10 2686 OSBORN. BETH SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER -PPE 4/19192 66229 162.00 235 OWEN ELECTRIC FLOOD LAMPS 0 66230 4.511.64 2071 OWENS. OPAL SQUARE DANCE /ART IN THE PK 519/92 66231 50.00 2212 PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPPLY MISC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES A 66232 90.74 3404 PELTIER, KEVIN OFF -SITE CLASSES REC ASST. 66233 125.13 2805 PENDERGRAPH. RONALD ADULT BB OFFICIAL 66234 9D.00 5667 PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES 0134 OVERPAYMENT OF BUSINESS LIC 114546 66235 25.00 6013 PETERSON. BRIAN ADULT SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 66236 54.00 311 PICONE FLUP81NG CORPORATION SVC. CALL TO REPAIR LEAK 66237 53.00 2757 POMONA TRUCK C AUTO SUPPLY AIR FILTER 66236 09.88 2961 PORCU. DANIEL ART IN THE PARK ENTERTAINMENT 66239 185.00 2150 PORTER, DENNIS ART IN PARK 0 66240 35.75 2994 PRINT SOURCE. THE BUS CARDS- POMELLACFREENO 6 66241 40.49 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY SHIRTSSPANTS-OTTEN. ADARE, YNIGUEZ 66242 23.71 3083 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSIM CHG FOR 3RD LEVEL 1959 SURVIVOR BEN 66243 16.412.50 5668 PULSAR DEVELOPMENT. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 612094 66244 92.71 2642 RAMOS, NICOLE LIONS CENTER. REC ASST 66245 143.06 3343 RANCHO MOBILE HOMES SERVICE. COMPLETION BILLG -NARY WHITE- MH90 -07 66246 3.233.00 5669 RANCHO SKI L SPORT OVERPAYMENT BUS LIC 6586 66247 65.54 626 RAUL'S TIRE AND WHEELS SVC CALL, TIRE REPR 9641 66248 45.50 2321 RECOVERY P.T. INC. REPAIR AIR CYL 0651 66219 233.77 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERIOD: 04 -22 -92 (91192) RUN DATE: 04122/92 PAGE: 5 ..... u• au•.... ...............000a.....................................................-... ...........v•.................... VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION PARR NO VARR. AMT- ....... ............................................ •...•.....uu.......•uu.uu.•. au..... a •v.............. .......... .•u•u. 5e71 REES CUMSTRLCTION, Y.J. 5610 REES CORP.. THE JAMES ZD23 RESPONSE ENVELOPE 2832 REYES, ANNE 276 RIVERSICE BLUEPRINT 5672 ROBINSON, JANINE MARIE 5673 RUBLES, O.M.O..INC.• PERLITA C. 56T4 RTMAV ELECTRIC 955 SAFETY KLEEN CORP 5675 SANS, JANICE 2066 SARURA JAPANESE DANCERS 5676 SALCEOO. KATMLEEM 5671 SAM'S PLACE 446 SAM BERM CC AGRICULTURE DEPT. 150 SAN BERM CO PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT 300 SAM BERN CC RECORDER 132 SAM DIEGO RDTLRT RROUM CO. INC 5275 SCHOLASTIC BOOK CLUBS INC. 3037 SCIORTIYG. NICOLAS G. 6752 SCOTT DAHLBERG L ATTYS OF RECORD 1105 SEAL FURNITURE L SYSTEMS INC. 5678 SIDOTI. CARL T. 2143 SIERRA SCREENPRINT GRAPHICS 351 SIGN SHOP, THE 692 SIR SPEEDY Q 3218 SO CALIF EDISON 1432 SO CALIF ECI$GN- -ITTN: SHEILA LUNA 319 50 CALIF GAS CU. 5679 SUNRISE COUNSELING CENTER 2995 SPACESAVER SYSTEMS. INC. 322 SPARKLETTS Isle SPEARS. PATST 3425 SPECIAL WEAPONS PRODUCTS 5680 STANSBURY MASONRY 1760 STEPHENS, HOUSTON 6328 SUBNAT 5681 SUNDERLUND, MICHAEL 2609 SWANSON, BOBBIE 5682 T.Y.A. ENTERPRISES. INC. 3424 TAYLOR, STEVE 4854 THE MOVIE SET - R08ERT OLARI 5653 TISCH. JAMIE 341 TAAMS -WEST FORD TRUCK 3036 TRAVERSO, LUIGI 3409 TRIMBLE, LATRINA '_213 TUNCAT. PAUL 1443 TURNER, ESTH ER 5684 TWENTIETH CENTURY (ZOTN) 5015 TIBAR IMPORT EXPORTS 693 U.S. /WHITE VAN BATTERY CO.. INC. 991 CHECK$ OVERLAP OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 616415 66250 16.55 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 118409 66251 41.50 610 WINDOW ENVELOPES 66252 322.71 CONTRACTED STAFF. CITY ADULT SOFTBL 66253 182_25 BLUELINE PRINTS STAPLING OF SETS 6 66154 67.64 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 012799 66255 12.95 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 018043 66256 92.28 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 019371 66257 15.36 A/C 01-112 -01- 6330-11110 -61761 SVC 66258 TI.66 CLASS REFUND 0307, RCT01355 66259 58.00 JAPANESE DANCE -ART IN THE PARK 66260 50.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 021413 66261 7.20 OVERPAYMENT OF 5US LIC 919111 66262 105.00 ROADSIDE NEED SPRAT PROGRAM 66263 6.432.61 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -2ND QTR 66264 15.675.00 LIEN REMOVAL FOR ARM M2U1- 623 -66 66165 8.00 2 SETS MODEL 100 GUTTER BROOMS 66266 133.61 BOOKS FOR PLATSCHOOL 66261 15.80 ADULT SOCCER OFFICICAL 66268 100.00 SETTLEMENT FOR LAWSUIT 66269 2.180.16 RECONFSGUR At ION OF CUBICLES 0 66270 11371.05 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 019679 66271 7.00 LETTERING FOR BICYCLE PATROL 66272 440.01 BANNER CNANGF. -ART IN THE PARK 0 66273 116.15 NOTICE OF AMENDED CITATION 66274 109.06 61 3D 213 9202 01 000 B 0 66275 438.66 (<< 66276 - 66279 >)> 61 30 206 5210 01 000 5 0 66280 3.782.00 16 3107 035 2001 3 0 66281 2.832.09 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 67513 66282 23.00 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 618855 66283 27.00 A /C01 425 800 3680 05 001 66284 34.10 BLU GRASS /COUNTRY MUSIC 66285 400.00 EQUIPMENT FOR BICYCLE PATROL 66286 2.268.B3 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 613774 66287 16.00 ADULT OB OFFICIAL 66288 90.00 ORC FOOD FOR 5/7/92 66289 45.26 CLASS REFUND 43260. RCT 094863 66290 16.50 ACT /EASTER BUNNY QUITS 4116 66291 16.50 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 016338 66292 132.36 INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL CLASS 06310 66293 ZDT.90 OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 0 16577 66.194 7.90 CLASS REFUND 06152, HIT 097529 66295 12.50 BEARING ST C AS 66296 13.07 ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 66297 100.00 BUILDING COVERAGE RED ASSISTANT 66298 247.50 ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 66299 50.D0 122 IUI71ON REIMB 664.61 A 112 66300 332.31 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 04436 66301 13.86 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC .19309 66302 63.00 1 -24 -6000 1 66303 242.46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -22 -92 (91/92) q TOTAL 175.039.87 RUH OAi E: 04/22/92 PAGE1 6 ....................................................:::.::::::.......................::............ ..... :...::.................... u CNFCKI OVERLAP 3214 URISA MEMBERSHIP -5 TRAMMELL 6 A COLEXAN 66304 40.00 3283 OVA, STEVE ADULT SOCCER SUPERVISOR 66305 7Z.00 3556 VAN VALAENSURGH. SUSAN AID /INSTRUCTOR PLAYSCHOOL 66306 60.92 5688 VICKIS FLOWER SHOP OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 9435 66301 2p.57 $667 VIDEO METMOPR OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 113933 66308 22.2D 5689 VIRGINIA DARE DENTAL CENTER OVERPAYMENT DF BUS LIC AI1991 66309 15.53 667 VISA 4820 0058 SD96 0504 1 66310 350.28 5685 WALLACN "S. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 121650 6631E 36.7A 428 WARREN L CO.. CARL FILE 010316, VICTORIA BOYD 0 66312 384.12 SSSO WASHINGTON HILTON TOLSTDY 5/7 -5/12 -APA CORP 66313 102.82 SSSO WASHINGTON HILTON CMITIEA /VALLETTE 518 -5112 APA CONF. 66314 654.15 5550 WASHINGTON MILTON BULLER 517 -5/12 APA COMF 66315 727.02 5520 WASHINGTON MILTON MCNIEL 5/6-5/12 -APA CONF. 66316 SB5.35 5550 WASHINGTON HILTON MELCMER 519 -5/12 - IPA COMF 66311 422 -88 213 WAXIE, XLEEN -LINE CORP 065 SIGNATURE TOWEL- A/C1331433700 4 66318 51:.82 3413 WEB CO. WEST SERVICE AND REPAIRS 0668 66319 2.450.00 374 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR A/CI6T4424-0 4 66320 158.00 719 WESTERN PUMPING REMOVE WATER WASTE 66321 560.00 5686 WINDROW STABLES OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 01422 66322 U.36 5049 VINN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 012647 66323 9.42 509 XEROX CORP ORATION 1020 COPIER- A/C/09T6176909 4 66324 1.17.040 :098 IAGORLM. KEITH EGG HURT 66325 I6.SD 3310 ZAVALA, DAVE ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL 66326 90.00 q TOTAL 175.039.87 C1 1 Y OF MANICHU CUCAMIINGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -29 -9Z (91/92) RUN DATE: 04/29192 PAGE: 1 ...............v.. VENDOR ....uu..vouuu.uuuu............ u................................................•....• NAME u•.... u•.........u•u•.... ITEM DESCRI➢fION ..........vuv..........uo........ ................................. NARR NO •...... ....u000..................vv..... PARR. AMY. .. CHECK$ OVERLAP 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 11111 -60 LET OFF LEN 65136 14.B2- <<< 65437 - 66326 >>> 408 ADAMS, DEBBIE CASH ACVAMCE CCAC CONF 1/29 -S /l 66327• 100.00 «C 66328 - 66328 >>> 6761 EMMERSON. ROBERT DISMANTEL VEHICLE HOMICIOE CASE 6 66329♦ 292.00 1432 SO CALIF ECISON- -ATTN: SHEILA LUNA 53 30 106 9100 D2 000 9 66330• 1.204.17 <<< 66331 - 66331 >>> ZITZ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ADMIN FEE T714509- BAATDUN 66332* 25.00 2972 COUNTY OF SIN BERNARDINO COUNTY ADMIN FEE NOTICE OF DETER/ 66333. 25.00 <<< 66334 - 66335 >>> 2732 ABC BONDED LOCKSMITHS LOCK REPAIR L INSTALLATION $ 66336 214.05 6753 ACTION COMPUTER CONSULTANT OVERPAYMENT OF BUSINESS LIC 021431 6633? 0.15 1167 ALL - CITIES FENCE COMPANY OVERPAYMENT OF BUSINESS LIC 16953 66338 16.39 3401 ALPERT, WILLIAM MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT -ART IN THE PK 66339 500.00 3134 AMAN BROS., INC. SOLID NUBBLE DUMP 66340 20.00 2411 ARAGON, SALLY INSTRUCTOR PAINT 1/2 CLA6200 -6231 66341 710.94 2299 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES HITCH EAZ -LIFT UTILITY UNIT 8634 66342 59.05 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS MONUMENTS - SAPPHIRE STREET 66343 1.381.40 2437 ASSOCIATED PLANTSCAPERS, INC. PLANT MAINTENANCE 4/1- 4/30/92 66344 1.590.2T 2000 ASSOCIATED TRUCK PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT #620 66315 107.81 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY. INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 66346 11.57 1061 AWARDS BY CHAMPION YOUTH BASKETBALL TROPHIES 66341 20.20 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 40 GALLON GARBAGE CAN 66348 13.57 3227 54YLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 9 66349 539.22 555 6EMEFIELC. KINGSLEY INSTRUCTOR PAINT 112 SPRG CL#6050 66350 118.60 1338 1081 BIG A AUTO PARTS BOLIN MAINT. C JANITORIAL. JOHN VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 4623 4 66351 331.88 6128 BOPKO. CHRIS JANITORIAL SVC CITY HALL OFFICES A TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 66352 66353 16.132.00 370.55 1166 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LINES INSIRUCTDR PAINT l/2 SPRG 45350151 66354 341.55 552 BURK- BLACKSCHLEGER, ROSEANN INSTRUCTOR PAYMT 1/2 SPRG 46100/75 66355 2.238.43 e57 C R G HEATING 6 AIR CONDITIONING SVC HEATING /AIR CONDITIONING UNIT 66356 170.00 3305 CAROE PACIFIC CORPORATION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 0648 66357 243.12 481 CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN MAT PREMIUM GROUP $10637 66358 24.774.12 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE STREET NAME SIGNS 4 66359 973.27 3423 CHAVEZ. GLORIA ART IN THE PARK IMTERTAINNENT 66360 75.00 675T CHVLLASOPONSRI. SFRNAM REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 45299 66361 250.00 74 CITY RENTALS SNAKE, ELECT., DRAIN 66362 30.00 3073 COLORAMA ANNUAL FLOWERS FOR CIVIC CENTER 66363 321.62 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 1653 66364 8.79 6158 CORDITH ANC ASSOCIATES VITAL RESPONSE -15T RESPONDER MANUAL 66365 25.45 6754 [RESTIVE TOUCH INTERIORS OVERPAYMENT OF BUSINESS LIC 422695 66366 90.00 85 CUtAMONGA CO WATER DISi «< 66367 - 39 >>> 6756 CUCAMONGA DISTRIBUTORS INC. CU FT 4 OVERPAYMENT OF BUSINESS LIC 18422 663T 10 21.091.95 3331 CUMERTY, ANN& INSTRUCTOR PAINT 112 CL 05460/61 66372 66373 47.41 6755 CUSTOM SIGNS INC. OUR. RAIMENT BUSINESS LIC $22302 66374 1B4.e0 239 0 L K CONCRETE CO SPINEL N/0 SAN 9ERMe RCINO RD 0 66375 21.71 6760 O.T.G. GASIDM THC. REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT #5157 66376 950.79 6759 CALTON• LINDA REIMBURSEMENT FOR PANTS 500.00 107 OETCO DESKTOP NAME PJTE 663TT 34.48 j 1D23 06A CONSULTANTS. INC. 4 STREET B SIR" OR" PLANS TR 013945 66318 79.20 66379 117.50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERIOD: 04 -29 -92 C911923 RIJN DATE: 04/29/92 PAGE: 2 . •......... •VENDOR •....... ......................... uv......................... •....... ........................ ITEM DESCRIPTION PARR NO ue.... .............. PARR. ANT. .................................. NAME .... ............ .............. .......... ............. .......... ............. ..... .... .......... . A. CNECMR OVERLAP 640 DRESCO REPRODUCTIONS BLUEPRINT PAPER L SUPPLIES 66380 153.22 546 CYORAK, 6AYLE INSTRUCTOR PAYMT 1/2 SPRG /6210/21 66381 723.69 719 E -I RENTS 3OX30 DANCE FLOOR -ART IN THE PARK 66392 SOO.DO 523 EASTMAN. INC OFFICE SUPPLIES N 66383 34T.7I 459 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE FILE EXPRESS 5.1 A 66384 95.84 1258 ELLIS, JANA REFRESHMENTS FOR C.E.R.T. CLASS 43 66385 25.00 1991 EMPIRE REPROGRAPHICS COPY OF BLUELINES 66386 77.59 2121 FARR'S - RANCHO CUCAMONGA RIBBON 663ST 2D.22 666 FILAMENT PRO AUDIO PG SYSTEM 66388 2,755.17 3197 FIRE MASTER SERVICED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 66389 19.50 3414 FIRST CHOICE VIDEO REPAIR VCR 66390 98.66 1505 FKP COPIER PANASONIC 1530 TONER 0 66391 307.87 4864 FLASMWEAR XS18W SHORTS /NO PADS AT 353.00 EA. 66392 265.00 724 FLORID, JOAN INSTRUCTOR ANY IN FULL CLASS 06026 66393 29.04 1844 FONTARA YOTURCICLES INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0 66394 61.31 830 FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES A 66395 123.91 2040 FORD OF UPLAND. INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 66396 49.05 3178 FOWLER, NARK INSTRUCT PAT IN FULL /CLASS 0532OL40 66392 544.00 1082 FRANKLIN INSTITUTE REFILL JUL 92 66398 26.61 4063 G.1 I. CLEANING OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LID. 0 LSS23 66399 $BJO 2168 GALL -S INC. NITETRACKER MAGNETIC MOUNT 66400 19.99 1444 GARCIA, AM' SCOREKEEPER - PPE 4/19/92 66401 60.15 3230 GATTI, TERI INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL CLASS 05470 66602 124.20 1154 GENERAL BINDING CDRPGRAISON PRINT •GRf FMfNT- 6J]0/92 - 6 130/93 66403 260.00 3434 GREEN, MICHAEL INSTRUCT PHI IN FULL-00 5300.1.2.3 66404 ]33.00 rV, 3417 GREEM. WILMA AFRICAN DANCE -ART IN THE PARK 5/9 66405 150.00 LJJ 1900 GRIEF ITN RND IATOR SALES VEHICLE K41 ATE NANCE - UNIT F 533 P 66406 42.00 «< 66407 - 6640} 505 13T GTE CALIFORNIA 024 -5936 0 66408 5.812.73 2353 GUIMAN. YVONNE EGG HUNT t MRS i $7.05 66409 20.20 3418 MANNA, PENNY L SLIM 'DEUCE' MUSIC - ART IN THE PARK 5/9192 66410 100.00 3435 MARRINGTDN, LOUISE PAT IN FULL CLASS A'S 6D30 -31 -34 66411 399.00 1244 MAVEN BUILDING MATERIALS SILICA SANG 200 GRIT - PALLET A 66412 443.29 2855 HAVEN NINE L LIQUOR CO. MARCH CATERING 66413 39.55 820 HEARD P.M.O.. EDWARD PMT IN FULL CLASS A'S 6341, 6344 66414 196.00 136D MERCMENRODER. KRISTIN EASTER EGG HUNT - OAT CAM' PREP 66415 56.40 1832 HERCHENROEDER, LAURI EASTER EGG HUNT 66416 27.50 2069 HEYDE, DONALD L. PAT IN FULL - CLASS 0 6302 66417 95.04 4070 MIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 1 4668 664l8 500.00 1234 H35EMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 66419 16.16 161 HOYT LUMBER CO.. S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 66420 40.41 2412 xOTT. RAY.OXO PAT 112 DUE SPRING /FULL ON 6320 66421 3.024.91 3436 HUNT, LUANNE PMT IN FULL SPRING CLASS A 5435 66422 126.00 495 HYORO-SCAPE PROOUCTS, INC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 66423 71.41 4072 1 A E 1 ELECTRICAL SEMINAR - MAY 26 -30 92 66424 99.DO 705 ICE, ALBERT PMT 112 CUE SPRING - CLASS 35290 -91 66415 66.99 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT REDHILL - RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 66426 128.38 2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 13 5 GAL. GREVILLEA NOELI 66427 94.05 1 4669 IMTECN OF CALIFORNIA REFUND DEPOSIT - PERMIT A 4794 66429 11000.00 4873 DEVELOPMENT JE..EL DEVELOPMENT O CAS RELEASE OF -TRACT 12420 C51t 66429 21500.00 2607 JWP INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACSN /92 FAIRY CONTRACT - 5/1/92 - 5/31/92 66430 1,894.00 C; ;'IT OF RANCHn F.UCAFOI GA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -29 -92 (911921 RUN DATE: 04/29/92 PAGE: 3 ..... • ..... •.. •................ • ................ a.................. • •........... •... •... v........ ...... .................. a..... YENOOR MANE ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. .............................. ....•u•............•....•......e• M. •u•.........• ov..........•... •.......................••..... 1029 1867 179 3427 1210 172 2040 195 1062 956 722 2952 549 3334 27ZT 253T 4865 3357 3515 3420 2225 4966 3057 487k 1171 3333 2159 2248 3121 3332 712 3416 3110 527 232 235 1826 818 1991 5115 487 5696 3185 2567 1079 311 3431 542 791 2719 5652 JNP TELECOM INC. X.A.P. EGUIPPENT SALES MAISER PERMAMENTE KELLY SERVICES, INC. KNOK KOILOVICM. DEBBIE LAIR. SHARON LANCE, SOLL 6 LUNGMARO M C I TELECOMMUMI•.AT IONS MAC DONALD. IAIN MAGALLANES, LINDA MAILSORT, INC. MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.IMC. MARVEL, KELLY MARX, MICHAEL MC ALLISTER, RICHARD AC CAULEY, NATHANIEL MC CONNELL. SHAWN MERCER, JACK MERRILL CORPORATION METER. LEIGHA MILGARO MANUFACTURING INC. MILLS, MIRY MONTGOMERY, ZEBRA MOTOROLA CUMMUN. C ELEC.. INC MJTT, STLVIA MUNICIPAL TOT COMPANY, INC. NAPA AUTO PARTS NAT'L COMPUTER SECURITY ASSOCIATION NICKLES. ARLEEN MORRIS- REPKE. INC. NOTAH.. SHELLEY O.E.I. BUSINESS FORMS OLYMPIC St LDIDS. INC. OMNITRAMS OWEN ELECTRIC PACTEL CELLULAR PLR4GON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. PARKHOUSE TIRE INC. PARMA PATTON SALES CORP. PAUL /SZN SHOES REPAIR PEARSON, ROBIN PETERSON, LILLI PHOTO MOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PICONE PLUMBING CORPORATION PINCOTT, JOHN PIP PRINTING PMI /DELTA CARE PONCNAUD, JINICE PLATMER LANDSCAPE, JIM 44 CHECK* ACCT a 4090359 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. A 19005 MAY PREMIUM -GROUP R 1932-00 9 HELEN CANZOIIERI -W /E 4/12/92 40 MRS 1 WEDGE ANCHOR 1 /EAT• X51270 0 INSTRUCT PMT 1/2 CLASSE 5160 5101 INSTRUCT PMT 112 CLASS A 5190 5191 1ST INTERIM CONTACT /FISCAL TR 91 -92 CUSTOMER A TEIZ6736 A INST PRT 112 DUE SPRING -9 5310 -5334 INSTRUCT PAT 112 DUE SPRING WEEK ENDING 4119/92 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 16037 IMSTRULT FRI 112 DUE 0 6240 -6250 INSTRUCT ANT 1/2 DUE A 5311 -5333 INSTRUCT FMT 1/2 DUE SPRING REFUND OVER -PAT ON REINS TO CITY EGG HUNT 5 MRS 9 5.50 MUSIC /ART IN THE PARK 519192 BONG PRINTING FOR AD 89 -1 INSTRUCT PMT 112 DUE SPRING 05135 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. A 143:0 INSTRUCT PAT 112 DUE SPRING 46001 -2 TIUITION REIMBURSEMENT L SOCKS SERVICE AGREEMENT 5/l/92-5131/92 INSTRUCT PHI 1/2 DUE SPRING 8 5040 EGG HUNT PRIZES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT A 624 A NETWORK SECURITY -VIRUS SCANNER EVIL INSTRUCT PHI 1/Z DUE SPRING 96073 HAVEN AVE. / CHURCH TO BASELINE 0 INDIAN DANCERS - ART IN THE PARK RECREATION REGISTRATION RECEIPTS 0 INSTRUCT PAT 112 DUE CLASS 15001-51 APRIL BUS PASSES ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION 4 A/C 01100190 A PORTLAMO CEMENT L PALLET 27%950K15 SANOAG• RETREAD 59130[3730 PARMA 50 CAL- TATE.HART.FLORES 5/5 60/.48 FLAT BAR 3/16/1 112 2 STRAPS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 112 DUE SPRING SUPPLIES FOR CRAFT 4 SLIDES- SPECIAL EVENTS A INSTALL TWO AIR LINES 4 ENROLLNENT L HEALTH FEE. BOORS POSTERS L FLYERS MAY PREMIUM GROUP 91236 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 112 DUE SPRING BONDING DIP REL FIRE STAY 01 OVERLAP 66431 66432 66433 66434 66435 66436 66437 66438 66439 66440 66441 66442 66443 66444 66445 66446 66447 66448 66449 66450 66451 66452 66453 66454 66455 66456 66457 66458 66459 66460 66461 66462 66463 66464 66465 66466 6646T 66468 66469 664TO 66471 66472 66473 66474 66475 66476 644TT 66478 66479 664RO 66481 3T.71 21.00 25.403.83 313.20 151.35 1.5T9.D5 265.65 8.450.OU 181.99 526.01 200.50 43.55 160.33 576.00 781.84 548.62 319.74 ZT.50 300.00 2.102.25 157.90 24.00 195.00 240.95 130.00 162.00 2.132.00 3T3.42 94.00 9D_00 6.906.39 300.00 818.64 2.128.50 414.00 1.701.99 35540 210.46 959.73 60.DO 31.03 10.00 252.78 77.86 174.36 735.00 60.13 i T2.40 919.73 131.67 4.390.80 C::TY Of RANCHO CUCAMON iA LIST Of WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04 -29 -92 (911923 RUN DATE: 04/Z9/92 PAGE: 4 ................•.............. VENDOR ................... u• u....................uv...............•........•.............. NAME ................................ ITEM DESCRIPTION •................................ PARR NO ..................................... ................................ WARR. AMT. u....... U CHECK* OVERLAP 5029 PRECISION R£-OSPACE CORY. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 816571 66482 46.96 5690 PROFFSSICHAL GREENERY SERVICE. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 812942 66483 5.81 55 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY SHIRTSAPANT$- OTTEN. AOAME. YMIGUEZ A 66484 175.39 5008 R M SUILOERS. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC #19273 66485 23.73 626 RAUL'S TIRE AND WHEELS SERVICE. TIRE REPAIR 1641 66486 43.00 720 REAGAN, VERA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 112 86270 66487 228.29 3432 RIOD, LINDA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1/2 -SPRG 6074 66488 90.00 112 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS OSS IMSTA -PRINT 66489 6.43 2T6 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRIMF TAB PRINT 1 66490 15.19 250? R00ERTSHAW, ENVIRON. CONTROL DIV. REPLACEMENT FILTERS 1 66491 3111T.99 3439 ROSE GRAPHICS, MIME BICYCLE TEAM SHIRTS 66492 177.TB 3335 ROSE. CHRISTIE INSTRUCTOR PMT 1/2 DUE SPRG 85430 66493 67.50 2142 ROSEBURROUGH TOOLS♦ INC. VR613RH 6 YR6l3LM 66494 107.85 16 ROTARY CCRPORATIOM 3/8• .050 LO -PRO 25' ROLL 66495 66.00 2671 RUSSELL, TONY TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 66496 84.88 ZDB4 SRFECO LIFE ENS. CO. GROUP ADMIN. MAY PREM FIRE PERSONNELROI 010183 0 66497 97.54 985 SAFETY RREEN CORP A/C 47 172 D1 6330 1 66498 552.08 1868 SAFEWAY SIGN VARIOUS STREET SIGNS 66499 8.077.21 <<< 66500 - 66500 >>> 2536 SALAI2. MARY ANN PETTY CASH 4 66501 414.56 5691 SALANO PRESS BOOMS CEQA A PACKAGE -BOOM l GUIDELINES 66502 61.91 2585 SAMPLES, RYAN EGG HUNT 66503 33.00 SRI SAM BERM CO AUDITOR /CONTROLLER BALANCE OWED 1991/92 CAL 10 PMT 66504 11.00 214 SAN BERM CO SOLID WASTE MGMENT SERVICE 2/28-3/3/92 -A /C $864 66505 3.201.59 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BRDDM CO. INC 2 SETS 6DO9700 GUTTER BROOMS 66506 259.60 3313 SARI DR'S MOBILE HOME SERVICE. PETE FINAL BILL MM IMPROY 3117192 66501 11444.00 3067 SA UL. SA pC INSTRUCTOR PMT 112 DUE SPAGR5410 665DB 297.00 535 SEMPLE, JUDY INSTRUCTOR PMT 1/2 DUE SPRG46220 66509 141.07 5692 SHAMROCK LIGHTING. INC. OVERPAY BUS LIC 84361 66510 46.50 1327 SMART L FINAL PUNCH. NAPKINS, RED YINES.BLLRM ONC4 66511 40.93 3384 SMITH PIPE L SUPPLY 1` CHECK VALVE, IS PVC PRIMER 8 66512 315.38 3278 SO CALIF EDISON 61 30 213 9200 01 000 0 4 66513 1.443.29 317 50 CALIF EDISON CO. 43 30 030 5086 01 4 66514 65.951.70 <(< 66515 - 6651T >>> 1432 SO CALIF EOISOM- -ATTN: SHEILA LUNA 62 30 225 3239 01 000 2 e 66516 25.786.11 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. 04 3114 950 6303 1 4 66519 SZ.98 5693 SOSRASKE, JOAN 801 REFUND PERMIT 892 -1107 $ 66520 143.00 5035 SOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT CORP. DEPOSIT REFUND SALES OFFICE- R71T95 66521 2.500.00 5694 SPARTAN CLEAN UP CORPORATION OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 813086 66522 61.35 546 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. MAY PREMIUM GROUP 449739 -01 8 66523 T22.16 5323 STANDARD PACIFIC DEPOSIT REFUND @4589. TR 13565 66524 11000.00 2893 STATE HUMANE ASSOC. OF CA. 3 SETS 1992 GREEN REV OF 1988 HNOBK 66525 27.49 3483 STRACMOTA INSURANCE AGENCY GENERAL LIAR RENEWAL PACM20407848 66526 535.00 2718 TERRY, DONNA INSTRUCTOR PMT 112 DUE SAPS 66527 194.37 3167 THROCKMORTOM, KARCELA INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL SPRG 46041 66528 100.80 2958 UMPS 40.E US ASSOCIATION SYCS 411/92 - 4/15192 66529 1.530.00 2731 UNIGL08E REGENCY TRAVEL OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 816569 66530 197.50 2665 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE, INC. COMPENSATION- ESTIMATE $4 413-937 66531 203.00 3439 VAN FOSSEN. JEFF EGG HUNT 66532 17.50 3422 VIKING OFFICE PRDD"CTS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 66533 77.03 5695 VILLA OE GAD OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC SIT608 6653A 111.ZZ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA. ;A LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD! 04 -29 -91 (91192) 04 TOTAL 298.556.44 N RUN DATE= 04/29192 PAGE: 5 ......... ......................................................................ve.............. 'rt N.70R NAME ..... .............................................................................•.............. ITEM OESCRI➢TION RARR NO ................................ WARR. AMT. .........................u..... Of CHECK# OVERLAP 667 VISA 4820 0058 8143 0309 66535 151.10 1103 VISTA PAINT PAINTING SUPPLIES 0 66536 362.01 213 W%IE, KLFEN -LIME CORP SIGNATURE TOWEL 0331433700 0 66537 796.97 T50 WELDING INDUSTRIAL C TOOL SUPPL HELIUM C BALLOON REG RENTAL 0 66538 73.72 719 WESTERN PUPPING WASTE WATER C OIL L COOLENT RECTCLG 66539 66.DO 267 WESTERN ROCK CO 1 SCOOP BASE 66560 284.46 3131 WILLIE AND PIE OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 012016 0 66541 81.26 872 WITTER. JOANNE INSTRUCTOR PMT SPRG 06060.62.64 66542 462.00 509 \FRCP CORPORATION 5090 DUPLICATOR 0697893107 0 66543 2.063.59 3237 YOUTH ENTERTAINMENT SHOWCASE 500 SWEETS-A.C.T. EASTER BUNNY QUIT 665.4 14.62 2098 LAGORI%. TEITM TOUT% BASLEISALL OFFICIAL 66545 14.50 371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE MISC 1ST AID SUPPLIES 0 66546 665.30 04 TOTAL 298.556.44 N iMIK11TfOM IM YCGIIOEK MMi IliOegA Iw DrpNwwrr M A4oyli fwrryr Cwr.+i 1901 fr°pj"°r Sarin.,.. C6. gins rlwaflM IbneNVn,wd hzbw i+ri. Ynis. dlab.dahJo.0 1 1YR151 a IICEN5E151 R!E tq, -� -_- �� -- -luz WSS4G Effii 'ocL Af.f.d wd. Src 3011 L1 eECFIIf Np. sala9i COM 3615 Oab lord — 3. tIAME /sl Of A W(S) T. 73251 EIIa D. 1/5/9: uw, 91 Sin S. rrR(S) Of IA.WSACIIOIdi) FEE C. fYR U ,o tT1ne .^.seen lerusure m� S. lanes, of M:n.u-Nu a SFM 9170 -1916 I. 6 1992 f Nr0ir51116 CMw Lv Coe1 91737 CainrY *oru E Sbo. lrp e! lk.me 11 -1135M f. rvr Gry Firm., Yee S Mali,p Addrw 51 dMr.nr ben Sl -Mnb.. wd Snwr r-rr n..0 v Non you ..e ban �m.kM of a IAw•I7 10. Ra.. ryn .wr dnlol.d nary al 1e ponwn N0 IM AI.106gk f.e,o9e Comm. Ae a rpobJna mil lM 0.po.mwnl pw- n �� rainrp b M. Mt ri 11, Gt iNn a ryf5" i,I— Io rrmm 9 m 10 en m nnwMmmr r .h "I W dr.mM pest M IN, ap9Fralian. I} Applkmr o9ral lal IM an/ mwNopr wn9blM in a.d. IinmM 1-1. will bn mill M pwli(kMianl of a li< —, N1 Ibl rbe M .mill iar .,nbr. w 9ww w .wnlr b b rkbrrd 9n7 0 M pewewn of dw Ak k 1.ao9. Cal.ol Art. • 11 S7AIT Of IUIE NN C—t, al ...---- . - -'im -------- ------ M. ------- _ i/1/93 _ a.r+.. w.,r., it rw w. •..w..�.......... «.+e... r. «+.......u.....w r.... «.n ....... � .u.n r 11 Am1<AM ^ SCMDElf ----- -- --- ----- - - - - - -- .............. ..- .... - -..- .-..--..--... ....- ....- ..-- ..--- .....- - - -_ -. ------------------ -- -------- _-------------- A ----- __.__.__-------------------- -- I. ........ ........... AVRKATION BY TRAN{RRM — — 15SWEOfCAJfOMIA Conn, ol --- - - - N °m ................... OnN ........ r r«.in a 971u -i IL St.. FAn C�c JWZ 1nD1 .mlen m Nol WnrrM rAb Lla: Fm Drp , rn3 Ow Oro 5E9 cudI0 b.. enAngw, mid cnan9e in .ddrtsm Albrb.d fwadrd mdr., or lmetlrn fdaiw7 po9w1, f] ... .. .. .. .... ... ......... ............._fOIIFS MA11lD ... 1/]191.. -. fl.....,... q 1st Trust Bank sasse 04 /15/92 19TH STREET If] N s *CHINA GARDEN - -I APN 1076 - 011 -09 China C21 —� Zoning of Adjacent Properties: Stater ° North: Cal Trans and Low Medium Residential .� G rde, Rancho Low Medium Residential East: Brothus West: Low Medium Residential a 9710 97zo 5730 9740 9750 9760 9762 n764 9766 9768 9770 1st Trust Bank sasse 04 /15/92 19TH STREET If] N s *CHINA GARDEN 9770 19th Street APN 1076 - 011 -09 CURRENTLY ZONED: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL —� Zoning of Adjacent Properties: Cl> ° North: Cal Trans and Low Medium Residential m South: Low Medium Residential East: Medium High Residential West: Low Medium Residential a 1st Trust Bank sasse 04 /15/92 19TH STREET If] N s -- - - - - -- CITS' OF RANCHO CI "CAJIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior Civil Engineer' SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE 1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM, TO BE FUNDED FROM SBA TREE GRANT, ACCOUNT NO. 124 - 4631 -6028 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the 1992 Tree Planting Program and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids ". BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is 546,500.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 9 and May 12, 1992, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM on Thursday, May 28, 1992. Respectfully submitted, J �Z "d William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LB:sd Attachment cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION NO. a�- /�� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "1992 Tree Planting Program ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 28th day of May 1992, sealed bids or oroposals for the "1992 Tree Planting Program" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 1500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "1992 Tree Planting Program ". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Z( CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM May 6, 1992 Page 2 The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or E. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The requirements nofa d Sections177 7 .5oanda1777.6uInethehemployment ofmapprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, Z i CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM May 6, 1992 Page 3 ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation, of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50n) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment Of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Endineering ZZ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM May 5, 1992 Page 4 Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $25.00, said $25.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursabie payment of $15 -00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of , 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of , 19 . ATTEST: City Clerk r� ti ADVERTISE ON MAY 9,AND MAY 12, 1992 23 DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF COMCAST CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE RECOMMRNDATION• Adoption of Resolution 91 -012H extending Comcast's Franchise License for 90 days. The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue the negotiations with Comcast to ensure that every opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License. Respectfully submitted, Susan Mickey Management Analyst I SM:jls Attachment Zy r • D:• • • I U MI •• MI • 1� • • N • N/ N• 1 •• Y Y•1:5 i •• t1 1• p11. 1• • • • • 1.1• • Np I• 1 1 N • �, I•Y .I • Y•yl•,y VhiII2ER+.S, the Franchise Lioerse granted to Comoast Cable T.V. by the County of San Bernardino and grardfathered into the City of Rancho Cuemonga will expire on May 6, 1992; and WNERFAS, negotiations are cngoing between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Commst Cable T.V.; and WHIERFTS, all terms and caditio s of the current license will continue the same. NOW, THRUIURB, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to extend the Fraurhise License for 90 days after the expira- tion of the current county of San Bernardino License, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPM this 6th day of May, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Bugnst, Stout, Williams, Wright NOES: None L. Stout, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. AWE, CITY aERK of the City of Rancho aMmonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Caczimc ga, California, at a regular meeting of said City council held on the 6th da'; of May, 1992. 2-S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $160,683.26 FROM DEFERRED REVENUE (FUND 87- 3901 -7907) TO THE REDEMPTION FUND (FUND 87 -4637 -7920) TO CALL BONDS WITHIN CFD 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE DISTRICT) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council's approval to appropriate $160,683.26 from deferred revenue (Fund 87) to the Redemption Fund to call bonds within CFD 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage District). �7:S�L'SH i��IU517/ A /• ��ii9 On September 16, 1988, First American Title deposited with the City for CFD 84 -1 the sum of $109,248.54 on behalf of CALTRANS as a prepayment for special taxes. This money was placed in a trust fund to be used to call bond on August 1, 1992. With the refunding of CFD 84 -1 the deposit along with all interest revenue which totals $160,683.26, must he forwarded to Bank of America, fiscal agent for this district to call bonds. Re ectfully submitted, e 16• yj DO'^ r lwood Deputy City Manager JBF:de CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r- DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director SUBJECT: AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR USE OF SCHOOLS FOR DAY CAMP PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATION Entering into a one quarter contract which includes reimbursing energy cost. BACKGROUND Annually the City, through Community Services, provides summer day camps for youths. The program is best offered at a school site because the various uses at city community centers prohibits dedicated full -day use of rooms, which is necessary for day camps. Last year the City and the Alta Loma School District entered into this same agreement. Resp ctfully submitted, Joe chintz, C Cc unity S. s Director JS /kls O q S a H.➢ I S R I Bo,N dbux e. Mrn�4n WALTER COILM Alta Loma School District SAN RAMALY CAROLY, EM2S 0 N District Office Roma W, TMC7U&N 9340 &ssdinc Ruad, Foit OHim Box370, Alta Loma,falJortia93703 (734)987 -0766 REMMaV Gom> FAX (714) 9874204 sqp .,mdot March 31, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga ?0500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATT E6 T 10)!: Nettie Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor SUBJECT: Letter of Agreement for City Summer Camp at Deer Canyon and Carnelian Schools Dear Nettie: The provisions enumerated below embodies our agreement for the use of the school district's facilities at Deer Canyon and Carnelian Schools for the City's Summer Day Camps. Please review, and if the city agrees, please have an authorized city official sign. We look forward to similar joint efforts to serve the community in the future. 1. City will reimburse the district for any damage to Deer Canyon or Carnelian Schools arising from city use of the facilities. Joint inventory of condition of the facilities will be made prior to beginning of use. 2. City use will be confined to multipurpose room, bathrooms, and playgrounds at Carnelian School, and trailer 37, bathrooms, and playgrounds at Deer Canyon School. City understands phones (see Item 10) and kitchen facilities will not be available, 3, District will issue keys to contract city employees for multipurpose rooms and bathrooms for opening and closing of camp. City acknowledges their responsibility to secure and lock ali areas to which they have access prior to leaving each evening. 4. City staff will maintain multipurpose room, classroom trailer d37, and bathrooms in a clean condition and provide toilet tissues and towels for restroons. 5. City will work with district to avoid disruption of educational programs. City staff will obey rules and directions given by school staff. 6. City will provide district with certificate of insurance for liability naming district as an additional insured. Amount of policy shall be at least $1,000,000. %g HILLY SIRVN Dc1W R 6h':iL'LD DANM WARDLV Itma<uonelkmm P.OmAiMpl Na m'!s rm, nmmc, +&Mltn .. _ _ 0 A _ A L O M B s c " . n I s R I C P. a s • 7. City use will be confined to week -days from 7 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. Camp will operate between June 22 and August 21 at Carnelian School and from June 24 to July 22 at Deer Canyon School. City will endeavor to have field trips during the last week to avoid di rooting district preparations for opening of school =yw i ha t rid +cip on rived cSdR7 &06 ') K +nc r0cm {vr 0* r .td ci.i f 8. City will reimburse the District for electrical utilities at the Tr day rate of $5.87 per day at Deer Canyon School and $12.51 per day at Carnelian School. 9. City acknowledges responsibility for maintaining authority over day camp participants and will provide for removal of participants causing undue disruptions or damage to school property. 10. City will provide for adequate phone communication either by installation of phone lines or cellular phones, or by paying district to provide for a phone in each multipurpose room (would require installation cost). 11. City recreation staff that will be at sites will meet with school and district staff on June 19, 10:00 a.m., to review plans and rules for city use of sites. Meeting will start at Deer Canyon School and move to Carnelian School. APPROVED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Signature ate c: Gary Hal t Mimi Pfaadt Mary Ann Burke Gary Chamberlain Martell Hillis OW /js SUMCMP331 2° ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT Sig nature ante ar en Date CITY OF RASCFiO CI'C'ANIOSGA STAFF REPORT r,zl BATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council JJJ!!! Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALAVERAS AVENUE AND NINTH STREET BETWEEN JULIA GUTTERO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA YFUMOF ATTON It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication between Julia Guttero and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The attached subject Agreement between the City and Julia Guttero provides for street improvements which include curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, along the northeast corner portion of the Guttero parcel. Julia Guttero has agreed to grant to the City a Road Easement to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements for the Calaveras Avenue from Ninth Street to Chaffey Alley Project. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil,_/ City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBIC IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA GUTTERO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Calaveras Avenue from Ninth Street to Chaffey Alley Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the northeast corner portion of the Guttero parcel, shall be made a part of the Calaveras Avenue from Ninth Street to Chaffey Alley Project; and WHEREAS, Julia Guttero has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. - NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California , does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 4- x DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Sack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF A LIEN AGREEMENT AS SECURITY FOR THE COMPLETION OF ON -SITE GRADING ACTIVITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90 -37 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN I -15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS. RECOPROMATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the Lien Agreement as security for the completion of on- site grading activity and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. DISW 10N: Conditional Use Permit 90 -37 (Foothill Marketplace) was approved by the City Council on August 21, 1991. As a condition of approval for the project, grading plans are to be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. As is customary with the issuance of any grading permit, security must be posted with the City. This security provides the City with the means to correct and /or finish the on -site grading necessary to ensure the public health, safety, and welfare should the developer be unable to complete the grading work consistent with approved plans. Also, the security provides the means in which the site can be restored to its original condition should the developer fail to complete the grading operation. The security required can take many forms, including bonds, certificates of deposit, cash deposit, set -aside letters, or lien agreements. In this particular instance, the developer has agreed to execute a lien agreement with the City as the form of security. The attached lien agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and staff and found to be acceptable. 1 peep ct£u lly jubmlt to d, I % Rick G k/ ez Community Development Director I Atta chmen : Lien Agreement Resolution of Approval Z APR-29-?2 wen 1 2] 0 1 ANDREW D N A G D O N H L D R.02-02 RECORDING REQUESTED, AND WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Attn: Building Official CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH LIEN RIGHTS IN LIEU OF COMPLETION BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this Agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the applicable Ordinances of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the %dy', and FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS, a Cebforrla general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Develcoer °. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer desires to grade certain real property owned by it for which grading plans and a grading permit have been conditionally approved. Such real property is located adjacent to and southerly of Foothill Boulevard, between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "Pro r ") and is more particularly described as; and Lots 3 through 8, 10, 11 and 13 through 15 as snown on Parcel Map 13724, recorded February 4, 1992, in the County of San Bernardino, Pages 100 -107, in Book 164 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County. 33 APP-29-92 WED 1 1: 2 3 A N D R E W H. M A G D O N p L D P. 0 4. 1 ti WHEREAS, City has established certain requirements regarding the performance of • the grading and for posting of security with respect to the completion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agraed by City and by Developer as follows: 1. Au reed Performance By Developer. The Developer hereby agrees to perform the works of grading and improvement described on Exhibit to this Agreement, and more particularly detailed in the grading plans submitted to and approved by the City with respect to the Property. 2. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective when signed by the authorized representative of the City and Developer. 9, Qomoliance By Devolooer. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the prov,$)ons of this Agreement, the City shall have the right after giving fifteen 115) days wr.iten notice to Developer to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer the full cost and expense incurred. Performance by Developer of the obfigations contained herein are secured by the lien and assessment provisions set forth in Section 10 of this Agreement 4, Gradina Work. The grading and other improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Grading Plans approved by and on file in the office of the Building Official. The Developer shall also be responsible for construction of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the Property boundaries as needed for safety and proper surfare drainage. Errors or omissions discovered during construction shall be corrected upon the direction of the Building Official. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this Agreement. 5. GLB.dLn4 Permit. A grading permit shall be obtained by the Developer from Cie office of the Building Official prior to start of work: all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply vnth this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. *39 !oose rocKs and other debris from public rights-of-way within or adloiring the Property resulting from work relative to sold development. 7. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shali not terminate until the grading and other improvements described rere.n have been accepted to the reasonable satisfaction of the Building Official. a. Connotation- Warre-it Y. The Deve!oper warrants to the City that the grading and imp'overnents descrited in this Agreement shall be installed free from material defects in matera's and workmanship. 9. !nsurance. Cevolover shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shalt protect it and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this Agreement from claims for property damages which may arise oacause of the nature of the work or from operations under this Agreement, whether ouch operations are perfcnned I y Developer or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directfy or incLrecdy enployed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone v mployed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as an additional :nsured and directly protect the City, 's officers, agents and amp:oyees, as well as the Developer, its contractors and its subcontractors, and all 'nsurance policies sued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: Contractor's Lability nsurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than 5500,000 for Oath person and $1,C00,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each acrAont or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $500,000 for claims which may arise from the operations of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this Agreement proviOng bodily Injury liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each peiscn and 91,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, ar,d property damage iiabdity limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $500,000 which i 35 WED 1 1 = 2 4 f N D F E W B. ` H C D O N H L D F'_ Q 3 1 6 S. Clean llo Procedures. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all !oose rocKs and other debris from public rights-of-way within or adloiring the Property resulting from work relative to sold development. 7. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shali not terminate until the grading and other improvements described rere.n have been accepted to the reasonable satisfaction of the Building Official. a. Connotation- Warre-it Y. The Deve!oper warrants to the City that the grading and imp'overnents descrited in this Agreement shall be installed free from material defects in matera's and workmanship. 9. !nsurance. Cevolover shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shalt protect it and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this Agreement from claims for property damages which may arise oacause of the nature of the work or from operations under this Agreement, whether ouch operations are perfcnned I y Developer or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directfy or incLrecdy enployed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone v mployed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as an additional :nsured and directly protect the City, 's officers, agents and amp:oyees, as well as the Developer, its contractors and its subcontractors, and all 'nsurance policies sued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: Contractor's Lability nsurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than 5500,000 for Oath person and $1,C00,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each acrAont or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $500,000 for claims which may arise from the operations of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this Agreement proviOng bodily Injury liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each peiscn and 91,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, ar,d property damage iiabdity limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $500,000 which i 35 R P R- 2 9- 9 2 WED 1 1: 2 6 ANDREW D. M F C: D 0 N41 L Li may arise from the operations of the Developer or its Contractor in performing the work provided for 'narein. 10. Enforcement Remedies / Lien Rights. P. 06- 1 n (a) Aoreernent to Pa v. Developer covenants and agrees that it shall complete and pay for all of the grading and improvements covered by the terms of this Agreement, and that the Property owned by it is expressly made subject to assessments as set forth in this Agreement and agrees to pay to the City in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, and to allow the City to enforce the assessment liens established in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement by nonjudicial proceedings under a power of sale or by other means authorized by California law. IN AsS.assmentsrL'en and Obligation of Dev_QIQgg. Each assessment or installment, together with all collection costs and reasonable attorneys fees relating to collection and enforcement thereof, at the time such assessment or installment becomes due and payable, shall be a lien upon the Property. (c) Levviny of Assessment. In the event the City determines that any assessment shall be levied for the purposes specified in this Agreement, the City shall deliver written notice to the Developer describing the reason therefor, and the date upon which payment Is clue. In the event said assessment is not paid by the date specified for Payment, interest shall accrue upon such assessment at the judgment rate as specified, from time to time, by the California legislature. upon delivery of said notice of assessment, said assessment shall thereupon become a lien against the Property, and such lien shall be enforceable by a power of sale under California Civil Code, The City shall not be limited to one form of action in enforcing and collecting said assessments. The City may commence and maintain a lawsuit directly on the obligations contained in this Agreement without waiving its right to enforce its hen against the Property for delinquent assessments. (d) BQQgrding of Assessment Lien, A delinquent assessment or installment, together with accompanying interest in collection cost and enforcement costs including reasonable attorneys' fees, may be recorded in the Official Records of San Bernardino County. The City shall prepare a written notice which describes the amount of the assessment or installment, the related charges authorized by this Agreement, a description of the Property, and the name of the Developer, and such assessment notice a 3 ]O APR-29-92 WED 11:25 ANDREW H. M A C D O N A L D shall be acknowledged by an authorized representati,,e of the City. If the assessment and related charges are paid or otherwise satisfied, the City shall record a notice of satisfaction and release of lien. (e) Poreelosu'ro Under Assessment Lien. The City may enforce any assessment lien established hereunder by filing an action for judicial foreclosure or by recording a notice of default in the form described in the California Civi! Code to commence a nonjudicial foreclosure under power of sale. Any nonjudicial foreclosure under power of sale shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Callfwnia Civil Code that are applicable to nonjudicial foreclosures of mortgages or deeds of trust, under power of sale, provided that the City may appoint its attorney, any officer or any title insurance company authorized to do business in California to conduct the sale in the role of trustee. The City may bid on the Property at the sale and the City may hold, lease, mortgage and convey the acquired Property free of all rights of redemption after said nonjudicial sale. It Developer's default is cured before the last date for redemption as described In the California Civil Code, or before the completion of a judicial foreclosure, including payment of ail costs and expenses incurred by the City, the City shall record a notice of satisfaction and release of lien, and upon receipt of written request by the - Developer, a notice of rescission rescinding the declaration of default and demand for sale, 1 1. Developer's obligations and rights under this Improvement Agreement may be transferred by Developer to any party who purchases said project and who expressly assumes Developer's obligation hereunder -- no such assignments or transfer shall be effective until (a) new or substituted insurance and improvement security, as specified herein, is received by the City from the purchaser, and (b) a written amendment to this Agreement is approved by the City, consent to which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 12. Completion by City - Rte. In the event the Developer fails to perform the grading improvements specified in this Agreement and subject to the terms herein, the City shall have the fight to complete any or all such grading improvements deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare of persons and properties in the vicinity of the Property. The Developer hereby agrees to grant the City env rights of entry of temporary construction easements necessary to perform such grading improvements on the Property. Z 3-] ,-l6R __ .2 WED 11.26 ANDFEW D 1. i_DO!,.,LD F'. 1'9 1 13. Unless the City expressly agrees by mods icatior or amendment to this Agreement, this Agreement shell be binding and Inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their heirs, executors, successors or ass ;gns wherever the context requires or admits. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have Caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formol;t;as required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures. April , 1992 By: Foothill Marketplace Partners, a California general partnership By: The Wattson Company, a California general partnership, General Partner By: Donald A. Wattson, Jr., Managing General Partner DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE Accepted: April , 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation 38 RESOLUTION NO. VlO -X34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT AS SECURITY FOR THE COMPLETION OF ON -SITE GRADING ACTIVITY FROM FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR 'TO SIGN THE SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, approved Conditional Use Permit 90 -37 on August 21, 1991, subject to certain conditions which require the review and approval of grading plans prior to issuance of grading permits; and WHEREAS, Section 15.12.240 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the posting of security with the City prior to the issuance of grading permits to assure that work to be performed under the permit, if not completed in accordance with approved plans and specifications, will be corrected to eliminate hazardous conditions; and WHEREAS, the posting of security as a prerequisite to issuance of grading permits for Conditional Use Permit 90 -37 has been met by entry into a Lien Agreement by Foothill Marketplace Partners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor to sign the same, and directs the City Clerk to record the same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. l791 CITY OF ItAti('IIO Ci'C A1NIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: %nay 6, 1992 T0: ^ay or and Members of the City Council V Jac!; Lem, A.ICP, City Manager 'J FROM: Will iam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: 'Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SIi BJECT: APPROVAL OF MAPS, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATIONS TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 4 FOR TRACT 1105. 14407 AND 14407- 1 LOCATED ON THE SCUTRf EST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Nos. 14407 and 14407 -1 accepting the Improvement Agreement, improvement Securities, Agreement for Postponement of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, ordering the annexations to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said maps to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract Nos. 14407 and 14407 -1, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive, in the Medium Density Residential District of Terra Vista Planned Community, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 12, 1992, Tract 14407 consists of 10.97 acres and is being subdivided into 114 numbered lots and lots A thru Y and Tract 14407 -1 consists of 2.28 acres and is being subdivided into 13 numbered lots and lot A, respectively. The Developer, Lewis Development Company, is suhmitting an Improvement Agreement and Securities to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Tract Nos. 14407 and 14407 -1 Faithful Performance Bond: $205,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $102,500.00 Monumentation Cash Bond: $ 12,300.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TP NOS 14407 AND 14407 -1 May 6, 1992 Page 2 The Developer, is also submitting an Agreement to postpone the recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Tract No. 14407 because review of the CC &R's by the California Department of Real Estate will most likely result in changes to said CC &R's and cannot be accomplished prior to the requested date for recordation of the final tract map. Prior to City approval of occupancy releases, the Developer is required to submit the proposed CC &R's with certification of approval by the Department of Peal Estate, to the City for their approval and to the County Recorder for recordation. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Copies of the agreement and securities and The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, /� r William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO: Attachments III RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14407 AND 14407 -1 WHEREAS, the Tentative Maps of Tract No. 14407, consisting of 114 numbered lots and lot A thru Y and Tract No. 14407 -1 consisting of 13 numbered lots and lot A, submitted by Lewis Development Company, Subdivider, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive have been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and aoproved by said Citv as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Maps of said Tracts said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Maps offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Maps delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. Z- RESOLUTION N0. ga, r3 (p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 14407 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 14407, submitted by Lewis Development Company, Subdivider, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive in the Terra Vista Planned Community, was conditionally approved to prepare Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) in compliance with standards established by the City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of building permits for the proposed development, said subdivider has entered into an agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Agreement be and the same are approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. 113 RESOLUTION NO. qa- 137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 FOR TRACT 14407 -1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District "); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report ". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including tliTy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. L1`4 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANDI � EASE G /NE .POA/� ADDISON STREET & GRAPEVINE STREET { i ( TRACT 10. 14407 ( �STREEr rpEE EASEMrNTS I i q r�rlGRAPEVINE STR rZi A / Od N, rs. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR /4407- i STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT W • PROJECT NAME: TRACT 14407 -1 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 2.28 ac NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 13 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps_ to be Annexed District Ne, 58OUL 9ObUUL "�6 6W ?2,UUU— 27,500 1 - -- --- --- --- --- 4 6 --- --- -`- -- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Community Turf District No. Street Name Equest.Trai7 Sq. ft. 4 Addison Rd. - -- - -- Grapevine St. - -- - -- WV:5/6/92 Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Ea. --- 10 - -- 27 RESOLUTION NO. �)- /38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEYATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR 14407 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District "); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report ". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including t`hT evy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. Lt -� EXHIBIT 'A' 6r, , ;;,= 2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND .4 - ! BASE LINE ROAD �SCS RI / S.W. • ST. TREE NAINP. EASEMENT \� 9 r IV' N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 BASE LINE ROAD + -r� I I i I I i I >I I t ST ; RED El45EMEiYT r, GRAPEVINE _ STREET 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "B' PROJECT NAME: TRACT 14407 40. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 10.87 ac NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 114 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. I6,QOU ZZ,((juu i�b6 4 --- -- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Community Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Equest.Trai1 Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. 4 Base Line Rd. - -- - -- - -- 81 Mountain View Dr. - -- - -- - -- 28 WV:5/6/92 Sb i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION CITY OF RA\Cldu C1'CANIOSGA STAFF REPORT May 6, 1992 A r Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II,` —�, APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E %TENSION FOR TRACT 12870, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY DALY HOMES It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12870 were approved by the City Council on April 7, 1988, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,373,000 Labor and Material Bond: S 686,500 The developer, Daly Homes, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the improvements in their last phase, which have been delayed due to the slow economic conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, Lcc.E William J. O'Neil - City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments 611 Del LY HOMES C F C A F; F 0 R N I A a April 6, 1992 Steve M. Gillilan Public works Inspector Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 12870 Dear Steve: Please consider this letter a formal request for an extension of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 12870. Due to the ongoing recession, we have yet to complete all the required improvements. Tract 12870 consists of 67 lots, with 47 homes complete to date (includes 4 models). There are 19 lots remaining to be built on, with 10 currently under construction. The remaining improvements consist of city sidewalk and drive approaches for the 19 lots, conversion of the model complex, removal and replacement of damaged improvements within the public right -o£ -way, and the final lift of asphalt pavement throughout the tract. We anticipate all work to be complete by 2 -1 -93, Thank you for your assistance regarding this matter. sincerely, %C'VJd Tim Cos Director of Construction Operations Sz 41661 Enterprise Crde North. Suite 227, (emecule CA 92390 (714) 694 -1777 Fox (714) 699 -9220 RESOLUTION NO. �d, 139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 6, 1992, by Daly Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12870; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 513 CITY OF RANCHO CI-CANIONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer a-- BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I� SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13273 - PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING, LOCATED ON MILLIKEN AVENUE SOUTH OF MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13273 - Pedestrian Undercrossing were approved by the City Council on April 6, 1989, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $338,281 Labor and Material Bond: $169,140 The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 6 -month extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the remaining concrete repairs. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, _ L�� William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Avenue / PO. Box 670 / Uplvd, Cnlifomia 917850670 714,9850971 FAX: 714/9496700 u u :: a April 2, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. 0• Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Steve Gilliland Engineering Division Dear Steve: Enclosed is an Improvement Agreement Extension for the Milliken pedestrian tunnel. We would like to extend it for six months due to unanticipated delays in repairing it because of the rain and the need to wait until the cracks dry out. Also enclosed is our check for $251.00 to cover this extension. We appreciate your consideration of this extension request. Sincerely yours, LEWIS HOMES ty1NAGEMENT CORP. Don T homp ;on— Terra Vista Project Manager DMT:ksk Enclosures 5--5- RESOLUTION NO. q�- 140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13273 - PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 6, 1992, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Milliken Avenue south of Mountain View Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of, such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13273 - Pedestrian Undercrossing; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. S (� It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13898 were approved by the City Council on April 5, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $189,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 94,500.00 The developer, Mizrahi and Say, Is requesting approval of a 90 day extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the remaining 25% of the required improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, t "ir� ll Gf William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy Attachments 5 ...... - -- — CITY OF RAN(410 Cl-CANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II > c SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13898 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND LONDON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MIZRAHI AND SAY It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13898 were approved by the City Council on April 5, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $189,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 94,500.00 The developer, Mizrahi and Say, Is requesting approval of a 90 day extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the remaining 25% of the required improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, t "ir� ll Gf William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy Attachments 5 p �— L d R y t ,y7 T( OL ?' $� APRIL 03, 1992 -ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 ATTENTION: STEVE GILLILAND/ PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR DEAR STEVE, AT THIS TIME WE ARE REQUESTING A 90 DAY EXTENSION TO COMPLETE THE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED WITHIN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. BECAUSE OF THE CONTINUING RAIN AND THE CLOSURE OF LEMON AVENUE, WHICH HAS CAUSED US CONSIDERABLE DELAY IN COMPLETING OUR PROJECT. AT THIS TIME WE OUR APPROXIMATELY 75% PERCENT DONE. WE FEEL THAT THIS WOULD BE AMPLE TIME TO COMPLETE ALL OF THE WORK THAT IS REQUIRED. THANK YOU FOR ACCOMMODATING US IN THIS MATTER. L MIZR 1542 EARLMONT AVE. LA CANADA, CA 91011 (818) 790 -8662 W. %JOE SAY 5019 SOLITUDE CT. ALTA LOMA, CA. 9170t �-` OFFIC4L NOTARY SEAL RE %R PITS NcBF ?' $� NAPMNOCO(ld BF.F NEx OINO COUNTY Ly Lamm Exo;us SEP 2fi, l9? J \ 1 RESOLUTION NO. qa. 1q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13898 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 6, 1992, by Mizrahi and Say as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13898; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. I" - --- °- - -- -- -- f'ITY OF RANCHO CI'CAb1ONGA STAFF REPORT r DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayo -, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ._- BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13930, LOCATED ON WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND AMETHYST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY HIX DEVELOPMENT It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13930 were approved by the City Council on February 22, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,279,OOG. Labor and Material Bond: E 639,500. The developer, Hix Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension from date of approval on said improvement agreement in order to complete all improvements. Only portions of the storm drain and the curb and gutter construction have been started. Hence, approximately 80% of the improvements need to be completed. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, F rL( William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG: Ty Attachments .an 1111 HIS DFULOPJIENT CORP. April 3, 1992 Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspec�or Engineering Division r- City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Improvement Agreement Tract 13930 r.':: Dear Mr. Gilliland: We hereby request an extension of the above referenced improvement agreement in order to allow the completion of offsite improvements as originally conditioned on the tract. Enclosed is our fee in the amount of $251.00 and three copies of the executed extension agreement. We resumed work on the tract in early March and should have the bulk of the improvements completed no later than early June 1992. The only exceptions at that time would be: 1. We may elect to base pave some of the interior streets so that final paving may be completed after site construction. This decision will be made with the input of our public works inspector. 2. Portions of the master planned storm drain line running from the project's east boundary to Archibald have been revised and are currently in plan check. We will commence and complete construction on these segments as soon as final plans are approved. In all other respects, barring significant further rainfall, all other improvements will be completed by early June, 1992. (15) ( 437 South Cataract Avenue • Smte 3 • 5an Dimah, CnLfornia 91773 • (714) 599 -8461 • FAX (714) 592 -50th For your information we are presently building 3 single family. homes on lots within the site, and have plans to begin an additional 3 beginning late May. We plan to market the balance of the lots as finished custom home sites. Our sales effort will begin fate May or early June - as soon as the bulk of the off site improvements have been completed. We have considerable motivation in completing these improvements in a timely manner since we will not be able to market the project until they are finished. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincq,rely,n Bob YodA�Y General Manager Enclosures L RESOLUTION NO. Gj,' - /�j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13930 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 6, 1992, by Hix Development as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Wilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13930; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. (' 3 -- -— STAFF REPORT �rc'a0i DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager !, FROM: 'William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public 'Works Inspector L+-- SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE MEDIANS, LOCATED ON MILLIKEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE RECOMMENDATION: � The required improvements for the Milliken Avenue Medians have been , completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City j Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $58,113. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The Milliken Avenue Medians - located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Mountain View Drive DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 !j Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond $58,113 Respectfully submitted, i ! 'William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd •li Attachment I \ iD RESOLUTION NO. 9d- 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE MEDIANS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF .A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE 'WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Milliken Avenue Medians have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is heresy accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. (G 5 - CITI" OF RANCHO CtVAXIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FDR TRACT 13565 - MWD LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CRESCENTA WAY AND RIDGELINE PLACE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 13565 - MWD Landscape have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $27,100, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $271,000. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Tract 13565 - MWD Landscape - located on the southwest corner of Crescenta Way and Ridgeline Place DEVELOPER: Standard Pacific of Orange County 1565 W. Mac Arthur Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Accept Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 27,100 Release: Faithful Performance Bond $271,000 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil -� City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment Io 62 / RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565 - MWD LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13565 - MWD Landscape have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 4, 7 - - - -- - - -- COTS OF RANCHiI CI'('A.NSUtiGA STAFF REPORT � r DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector IL = ,-'✓�., SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR MDR 88 -19, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN RED OAK STREET AND VINCENT AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for MDR 88 -19 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $150,000. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS MDR 88 -19 - located on the south side of Arrow Route between Red Oak Street and Vlcent Avenue DEVELOPER: Intech Ventures 27260 Haggerty Road, A -1 Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331 -1263 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $150,000 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment (1�19 RESOLUTION NO. 9a_ /�,r y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 88 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for MDR 88 -19 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. (�'q — CIT7' OF' RANCIiO C'l'CANIONG.1 STAFF REPORT z DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector 11 � SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND SUMMIT AVENUE RECOMENDATION: The required improvements for the construction of Etiwanda Avenue have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $220,000. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The construction of Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue Release: DEVELOPER: Watt Southern California 9035 Haven Avenue, Suite 102 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $222,000 Respectfully submil ed, o,1 William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG: sd Attachment 7a RESOLUTION NO. qp. /� , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE. BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND SUMMIT AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. - - -- -- -- - -- CITY OF RANCHO ('(- ('A\IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector 11,—.� SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD RECOPKNDATION: The required street improvements on the east side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $144,500.00. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required street improvements are located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road. DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, Ca 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $144,500.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil —� City Engineer WJO:SNG:Iy Attachment 7 z RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of the improvements located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line road have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 73 DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CI'CANIONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec torte-- t RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS FOR TRACT 11734, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW HIGHWAY It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Maintenance Guarantee Bond $18,240.00 Maintenance Guarantee Cash Band $ 600.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil '✓ City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd 7y -- - - -- — CITY OF RA \CHO C CA .11OSGA STAFF REPORT`S DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public 'Works InspectorI, SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR THE INTERIOR TRACT STREETS IN TRACT 13304, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE. RECOWNDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND /ANALYSTS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street Improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $10,538.00 Respectfully submitted, tl William J. O'Neil) City Engineer WJO:SMG:ly (S -- - — CiTl' OF RANCHO Cl-('ANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 �a TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector. SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS FOR PARCEL MAP 9192, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE RECOWNDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bonds (Street) $101,936 (Storm Drain) $ 67,448 (Block Walls) $ 53,456 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil __/ City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd % (p - --- --...- - - -- — CITY OF RANCHO Cl'('ANI05GA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 6, 1992 yca TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector— _i'2�:- SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES FOR PARCEL MAP 11030 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND /AMALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $61,660.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJ0:SMG:1y -77 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT -� DATE: May 6, 1992 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY. Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING OF JUNE 17, 1992 TO LEVY THE .ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85). RECOMMENDATION_ Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached resolutions setting a public hearing of June 17, 1992 and giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report, declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD -85). Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to fiance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40 acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary include, all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions, giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levv and collect assessments for 1992/93 Fiscal Year. The assessment rate increased from $35.00 to $52.(8) during the 1991/92 Fiscal Year, this rate will increase to $5359 for the 1992/93 Fiscal Year to cover the inflation costs for the district. Assessments for PD -85 will be levied according to the following schedule: IL¢ULtKIL Single Familv Residential Le,, than 1.56 acres 1,51 acres to 350 acres 3.51 acres to 7.1X1 acres ZOt acres to 14.(X) acres 14.(11 acres to 75.1X) acres 25.01 acres and Larger 6::ss�llt p�arsel $53.59 $26,.80 $80.39 $ 187.57 $375.13 $750.26 $1,339.75 Respectfully submitted. Wm. Joe O'Neil J City Engineer • Attachments: Resolutions Preliminary Engineer's Report 7Q f} RESOLUTION 40. �J- 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PO -85) AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously formed a special assessment district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in what is known and designated as "PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) ". WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the costs and expenses necessary to pay debt service on the bonds issued and costs for annual maintenance for Assessment District; and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved by this City Council, the Engineer's Report, as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of continuing with the proceedings for said annual levy. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: A. Recitals. SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. B. Declaration of Intention. SECTION 2: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the eT -i n 77o`n of this legislative body, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments for the payment of costs and expenses for the following designated improvements, including debt service on bonds issued to assist in financing said improvements. Construction of park and recreational improvements in Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks, including but not limited to, land preparation, Including grading, landscaping and irrigation systems, together with appurtenant work. That no new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed as part of these proceedings. C. Boundaries of Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That said work of improvements are of direct benefit to the proper e�if s—wrthin the boundaries of said Assessment District, which CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. May 6, 1992 Page 2 Assessment District the legislative body previously declared to be the area benefited by said works of improvement, and for particulars reference is made to the boundary map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection, and designated Dy the name of this Assessment District. Report of Engineer. SECTION 4: That the "Report" of the Engineer, as preliminarily approved by ,is egislative body, is on file with the City Clerk and open for public inspection. Reference is made to said 'Report" for a full and detailed description of the existing works of improvement, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District. Public Hearing. SECTION S. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 1992, Al THE OF 7:00 PM, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, LOCATED AT THE CIVIC CENTER, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR HEARING PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS AND TO ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH TO OBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL LEVY SHOULD FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. Notice. SECTION 6: That the City Clerk is hereby - authorized and directed to give no cite as causing a copy of this Resolution to be published in the Inland Va11ey Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within the Mity saTa T�fTon a completed not less than ten (10) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. G. Proceedings Inquiries. SECTION 7. For any and all information relating to these proceeding's; i cTu3ing information relating to protest procedure, your attention is directed to the person designated below: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone: (714) 989 -1862 7�L RESOLUT[ONNO. 5d. A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION r IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85) RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: 'WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1992. the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and /or improvement of said Park and Recreation improvement District tPD -85). WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report, attached hereto, in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration: and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof. and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report. nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: I.That the Engineer's estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith. contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2.That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described In said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3.That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively. from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report Is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. h.That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1992/93 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. WD Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga PD -85 Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fisca: Year 1992/93 .AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 1992/93 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85, thereafter referred to as "the District'. This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City, of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Secron 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right -of -way, public utility transmission right -of -way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. Improvement District boundary The improvement district imhrdes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, S%n Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation improvement District No. PD-85. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1.The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athlefic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails. 2.The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. D. The assessment rate for the 91/92 FY is $52.00, this rate will increase to $5359 for the 92/93 FY. It is estimated that this increase to assessment rate will cover the maintenance costs and debt service for the 92/93 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against a:3essment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Vehicle Maint. /Operations Maintenance & Operations Equipment Maintenance General Liability Contract Services Capital Expenditures Install Calsense System Heritage - Resurface Equestrian Rink Install Touch Pad System For Lights Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Delinquencv Contingency Debt Service Gross Revenue Required: 92/93 $237,510 $83,130 $24,000 $45,000 $6,000 $5,510 $5,000 $10,000 $40,000 $30,000 $87,000 $613,150 $245,470 $98,650 $828.244 $L785,480 Less: 91/92 District Carryover <5100.816> Total Assessment District Revenue Required: $1,684,664 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among ail lots or parcels with the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. A. to Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following condition ?. Parcel Size Range Less than 15 acres and 1S1 to 3.5 acres and 3.51 to 7.0 acres and 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 25.01 acres & larger and Number of Existing Res. Dwelling Units /Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 3 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcel not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. Ail public ownerships; 3. Railroad mainline rights -of -way; 4. Major utility transmission rights -of -way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than 5500 and 1.5 acres or less; and C Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1992/93 is $53.59 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $53.59 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1992/97 shali be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcel less than 150 acres $ 26.80 1S1 acres to 3.50 acres $ 80.39 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres $ 18757 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres $ 375.13 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres $ 750.26 25.01 acres & larger $1,339.75 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. PROJECTED 1992 /93 ASSESSMENTS 22,728 Single Family Parcels 22,728 units at $53.59 = $1,217,993 24lulti- Family Parcels 4,793 units at $53.59 = $256,857 Less than 1.50 Acres (935) Parcels 926 units at $ 26.80 = $24,817 1.5 Acres to 3.50 Acres (409 Parcels) 404 units at $ 80.39 = $ 32,478 351 Acres to 7.0 Acres (227 Parcels) 226 units at $187.57 = $ 42,391 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Ares (131 Parcels) 125 units at $375.13 = $ 46,891 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres (45 Parcels) 45 units at $750.26 = $33,762 25.01 Acres or larger (23 Parcels) 22 units at $1,339.75 = S29.475 29,269 units $1,684,664 PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DIS`I'RICTI' 85 PD MUM Si em M BY: Gil oMB v= BBPARW 9 Oi RIw CUCABBBCd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA TT LYTS 7WT BGMARY PD ANNE %ATICNS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 TR 14866 47 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 14192 -1 26 AU ANNEXED MY A 131 X41w 21 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13703 55 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PH 13113 2.0 AU y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I LEMON 1; 4vT2 WUE I N W Y 2I a v 9 W � W 8 v o m u J J �iA ELT+fCA1,1Ze ]in I LE4 @LID --tPw 49WNAS 47ZM7 4,4N7 (l7EALY) O *LkALTPJ! M"O"JA GT9W Tul C47 cAew) 0 L14VCAMBAC 3T7<AEIf CMA OpUTWAL, STMT TRH 0 EACW ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TMACT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 14eo� STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ek XIBIT •q• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 LEGEND ® CM MAINTAINED MIA u.T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 14197 -1 E%NIe;: "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 0 utr MPANTAIN¢D AREA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR 13114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 40 41 42 43 44 45 146 '47 48 149 50 25 22 8 54 35 26 21 �, 12 7 I 34 27 20 13 6 I 33 28 19 14 5 1 32 29 16 15 4 2 31 30 17 16 3 LEGEND ®CITY MAINTAINED AREAS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r -_ TR. 13703 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 39 51 38 52 37 36 24 23 10 1 t 9 53 LEGEND ®CITY MAINTAINED AREAS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r -_ TR. 13703 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 12 U' Q I r LEGEND Existing Homes CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PM /3j r3 �r`� STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOtiGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mav 6, 1992 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager lJ FROM: Vim. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer Walter C. Sticknev, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 17, 1992, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, AND 9 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City council approve the preliminary Engineer's Reports and set a Public Hearing for June 17, 1992, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and A. 0] LrQilj9NIIC� 10N I O.M.1l k F.11 , FAR&I _ Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, electricity charges are expected to increase for all districts due to a combination of a projected rate increase by Southern California Edison and in some districts an increase in the number of street lights being maintained. Edison charges for traffic signals are also included in the applicable districts. In addition, Operations and Maintenance charges for traffic signals, which in prior years was paid by State Gas Tax funds, will also be borne by the applicable districts. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. In some districts this carryover no longer exists resulting in an increase in the assessment rate. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 92/93 rates as compared with current FY 91/92 rates and justification for those proposed rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates. In one district, SLD 3, funds kill be retained to maintain cash Flow requirements. A Dolinquenry Contingency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies in tax payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the district can be transferred to cover required expenditures. However, if the delinquencies are as projected, various required maintenance activities will not have available funding which may result in reduced service knell. ao!et Lteh tine \ta : ten a. py(fju NiL l - Arterial An arsessment increase is recommended in this district, from $1018 to $13.81 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. !hu is primarily due to an increase in Edison rates and inflation costs previously borne by Stale Gas Tax funds. SSSet i htn Matirderranc District N,Q Z:LQ.a • An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $29.30 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. Electricity costs are expected to increase by over $30,000. Street Lighting Maintenance District lNSL a: Victoria Planned Community An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $29.74 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. This increase is due to a projected increase in electricity costs. $irerd Lighti n¢ Maintenance yjspjft `JJ_i. 9 _ Itm Vista Planne i Community An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $27.72 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. StreetI- `htinv Maintenance DjSlpfI h LSS -Capin Planned Community An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $33.19 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. 51Leet Lighting Maintenance District Lam. ¢= Commercial / Indu =_trial An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $31.21 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. Stud Lighting Maintenance District trict Ng, Z = North Etiwanda An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $32.16 to $33.32 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. This proposed rate is not subsidized with gai tax funds and reflects the annual requirements of the district. 5t=l Lighting Maintenance District Nu, a _ $oath Etilranda An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $121.92 w $12631 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. As more assessment units are annexed to the district it is expected that the street light -to- assessment unit will be reduced thereby reducing the assessment rate. Respectfully submitted,, �✓ %L r Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer L %JO:ws Attachments: Resolution Engineer's Reports -�q A RESOLUTION NO. 0 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work. SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the inteb ion o this City council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1992/93 for the maintenance and operation of those street light facilities thereon dedicated for common right -of -way purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway r—i-9 s-oT-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance District=- Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description of Assessment Districts. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, Ts—of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 ", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 ", "Map of Street Lighting -7q T CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. JUNE 17, 1992 PAGE 2 Maintenance District No. 5 ". "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 ", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 ", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 ", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district an which maps are on file in the Office of the city Clerk of said City. Report of Engineer. SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approve a annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Nearing. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 17th day of June 1992, at the hours -7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1992/93. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention. SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Governmen o e. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in Tle T'ty i of--On an o, a ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. / q C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and /or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That tba diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3, That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1992/93 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. 7q I Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD A1) is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this district. being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and /or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on arterial streets. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD N1 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. In addition, because State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past to pay for various traffic signal activities, projected Maintenance and Operations costs are increasing by nearly $30,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ql areas follows: pipposed Maintenance Budget for 1997./93 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration, and General Overhead Delinquency Contingency Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 91 /92 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $62,000.00 $5,470.00 $2,990.00 5108 23000 $178,690.00 $101,470.00 521,790.00 $301,950.00 $20,00) -$30193(100 Analysis: The most significant impacts on the proposed FY 92,193 budget are the increase of Maintenance and Operations of nearly $._'x4000 due to the elimination of a prior years State Gas Tax subsidy, and the increase in electricity charges due to an increase in street lights and traffic signals. For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $13.81. That is up $3.63 from the FY 91/92 rate of 510.18. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use I= Llnils Rate Factor AU. RGI.nt,f Commercial Acre 3,291.07 $13.81 2 $27.62 $90,900.00 Single Family Parcel 15"281.00 $13.81 l $13.81 $211,030.00 Total 18 ,572.07 $301,930.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT I .1. ,. - -- cr :m g51ftICT BBUW mum n ma m Br. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA mmu Gil DffmOI �i "`� �''�"�" SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ; + � - c 2 " CALIFORNIA BI.D1 ANNEXATIONS • ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 14192-1 26 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 2D, 1991 DR 89 -21 5 AU ANNEXED MAY 1 1991 PM 7451 1.77 All ANNEXED MAY 15 1991 TR 1314 21 AU ANNEXED JUNE 19 1991 PM 13825 27.74 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 CUP W-28 1104 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 ;R 14866 47 AU ANNEXED OCTOBER 16, 1991 CUP 91 -1' 2.38 AV ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14139 120 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14380 79 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 IN 14379 35 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 IN 13351 118 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 13717 197 AU ANNEXED DECEMBER 18, 1991 DR 8809 1.06 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 18, 1991 COYOTE CANYON FLEM6.88 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PM 13113 2.0 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13703 55 AU ANNEXED MARCH 20, 1991 OR 9005 9.06 AU ANNEXED MARCH 6 1991 TR 13351 -1 8 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 CUP 8926 9.92 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, 1992 TR 13945 35 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, 1992 DR 89 -13 .93 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 19, 1992 DR 8912 4.4 AU EXNISIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 + LEGEND ® CI7I NAINTAINIO MIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA � r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO a STATE OF CALIFORNIA iai91 -s E%H.ai: "A" A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 I SITE 50THILL BLVD. SPRUCE EUCAL AVE�- l�u WHITE OAK AVE HWY. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OR R9 -Z! STATE OF CALIFORNIA Q Q � Z 2 I SITE 50THILL BLVD. SPRUCE EUCAL AVE�- l�u WHITE OAK AVE HWY. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OR R9 -Z! STATE OF CALIFORNIA W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 �5/ i C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 57/92 HAVEN WEVUE �` STATE OF CALIFORNIA A :A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ® GI ?Y MAINTAINED AREA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR 13114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA rr Ct ND EXHIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO p STATE OF CALIFORNIA M tasar QUANTITIES TREES — 3 EXHIBIT 'A' r - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 APN 203- 261 -20 A i .nw..nrr e..r C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO c CUP 88_29 g STATE OF CALIFORNIA MALACRITE AVE .e II J �I .nw..nrr e..r C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO c CUP 88_29 g STATE OF CALIFORNIA MALACRITE AVE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I L14GUo --A -4" 4 w o2s 47=NT 071/7 aiveu) O #J"Lym! "AcAl"TA SIM Tm CM aww) 0 UAJU34MRAII SM491FAUA M7NWAA-� STMT =a cil EACJ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T¢acT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 14ea� STATE OF CALIFORNIA •4. aSSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 c! �I z �I 9595 LUCAS N t'ANC// RD U J' 1 FOU.P7h' STREET NO, 01= ST•PeBT 7RE_C - 2 EA, EUC.4111craS 1V1C110z1V 5TiPEE7- 1-10117' - NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA + COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO � - ~ COP 9 1-11 � S?ATZ OF CALIFORNIA LOT -s- 1 35 36 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 N.T.S. 34 43 37 33 38 42 70 69 66 x 51 1 32 39 41 > 71 V o 52 w LANDSCAPE AREAS TO 31 1 40 72 67 BE MAINTAINED BY It" e6 a 53 z LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 30 °40 a 73 es 66 — w DISTRICT. 100 gg 29 101 9e ae 102 74 94 or 65 A( 114 116 97 y 27 103 75 93 Be 113 64 104 116 26 112 t 96 76 92 c 99 63 25 105 117 Its 95 77 91 90 6'L 106 BO >: 91 61 24 ee LOT I -T- 94 70 23 107 109 109 110 119 93 r' 79 x 92 60 22 21 1 201 19 116 1 17 1al 16 115 1 14_X3 1 12 1 1 110 I 9 I 0 17 16 15 14 3 2 I -1 LCIT "y- I ::IV 1/411Y'."_ 1:!M�•1 IVv. 1 •ia., { 54 a 55 a 56 a 57 ; F 5e w 1 59 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _�- TRACT NO. 14139 I ASSES. , Nr D AG IACMNO. 7 �yµTr JI 76 �J JO JB J9 J SJ JO ♦9 26 I9 J6 d 6J V JT 60 64 21 65 G I Jg J9 �0 n \ 66 'CPT? \ % TO\ 67 2? -Y Ac /y 69 � 1.7 Alp �,\ J 1 10 \ i \ • i \ LEGEND �� B I \ \ 1708EI ARrAS ry�� r0 BF I WCAPT�EO lAAY£ &S77W OCfTRCT ®Orr I WIIAKO smArr WF ARCA TRACT NO. miss RL�� /� /� C /TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA //'�� ENGINEEFS. INC TiVACT NO. 14380 .._.�..�.�. �.wu.�... w.�... �wu.v a.a14. + "mw is wc r~a r c LEGEND 7O BEO NT<A'EO "ENQINEEFS. INC TRACT NO. mom C /TYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRACT NO. W79 7-9-M - CE8 I u. a7a m A79'-O�JJ ✓ -O4 EXHIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 i ,Sr, ARG�A • 6219 S.F. ASSESIEer DIAGIAI LUDSCAPE 11111EIAICE DISTRICT ID. TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO n STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSNEIT DIAGRAN-LANDSCA. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i WEST GREENWAY TRAIL ( POI. PCL, 2, P.N. 10295 QUANTITIES TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA : 13,500 S.F. HANDSCAPE AREA : 9,120 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA : 4,380 S.F. ( 4" THICK SHREDDED NULCH ) 5 GAL. SHRUBS : 469 EA. IK:1.. 4 PtlB. LW 1, T!. NO. 2202 7 RGILE. 1' 100' P. N. 10395 n N Q �i m H P'CL. 2 E4 t ASSRSSNENT DIAGRAN LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10. 4 0 N CHURCH STREET PRON ELN AVE. NEST TO ELN AVENUE H M M .r. •1'N)' IlM Yl ed 10 IIH :SL';.�7�rf: 0'.';7 ..' -U .1 9' 0: . 7T rr .:b -9�/ -� ASSISSI( DIAGRAI s _ \\AIDSC►PB RAJITI! ►IC% DISSIIC! ID. 4 TH. NO. 13717 r :d ILO 111101 SltOC1 111101 CIOICI STRIIT ST.LIQF114000 LUM.) 1 RA. �— ST.LIGHT(7S00 1J01.) f 4. 7 EA. ST. LIGHT(5000 LUM.) 17 U. —_ ST. TREKS (1S OAL.) 77 FA. SO M. ,S EA. PARKWAY LANOsCApING 17.300 S. P. 5,400 S.P. 7,570 S NOT[ : ALL CUANTITIRS s"WN ARE ONLY FOR THE PARKWAYS ADJACEIR TO TRACT NO. 17717. EXHIBIT "A" 3 OF 3 jSESSMENT DIAGF ,M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 y E4M AVENUE I 1 11 Ij Y O9V i EA SlREi7' c��71 2 E� STXe�TTREFs �t- reieON/ R0� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN IBERNARDINO ea -o9 v� ASSESSM? DIIGUN LANDSCAPE NAINTUMCE DISTRICT 10. 4 COYOTE CANYON IELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE r�Rn visrn �nRKw�r �� -- �177i7TTT ,'.'7�177TTT7777.�T %1:1�{— a I � rum 3, P. ®. 064.2 i i I COYOTE CANYON 8 I ELEM. SHOOL SITE QU/!N 7uRr goo s./° EXHOT W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 / - -- ----- -- - - - - -- — i ul ji o 0(I :' ems_ p kT A j �I •= 1 I �.Ir,�a _ •_ u i t LEGEND Existing Homes CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT •A• - I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 72 \ 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 � 47 i 48 49 SO 38 51 37 52 36 24 23 10 9 53 25 22 11 8 54 35 26 21 12 7 ®5 34 27 20 13 6 33 28 19 14 5 1 32 29 16 15 4 31 30 17 16 3 2 LEGEND ®CITY MAINTAINED AREAS i�'zG- L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 3 EXHIBIT .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 'a' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r - DA 90 -05 STATE OF CALIFORNIA I i is _n R ^ a w c wl Y'e0 3 $ / i 8 w n• ev ee• w �e emm a w� .• !, 'a' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r - DA 90 -05 STATE OF CALIFORNIA c EXWMT •A• LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENTA DIAGRRAM Na a STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND14 I .._— 4/IA ✓i.;A PARKrVAl! Y. }- _T...�___� _.:.. -_r • - _ -`tom- t "-�-�, = i R yi s.� � 1� 1.._..L^ I:� {i�.. rte= t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA rR iLIEL-i .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6. SITE STREET L /Gf17'5' 2 EA 5 TiPEET TREES 7 EA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Cup 99 -26 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT -3 LEGEND 1 DENOTES LANDSCAPE AREA S DENOTES SIDEWALA }1 DENOTES STREET LIGHT 0 DENOTES TREES .A - I'.I,,J; 1',19.4A- I -I -I- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA y � Ae 44 TR 13945 1 EXHIBIT CALE 1+200 A EX�181T -A- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND S ir RoJEC- r CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ COUNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO DR STATE OR CALIFORNIA I E.(HleiT 'A• AS5 cSSMEMT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND CZ i✓iNTH sr a I I �I i �J l T? Da� r 9a9 a I-q-1) R0N ca FE q) &J 1�D ° s LEGEND U STREET LIGHTS 1—=,4 STREET TREES 9E4 PY/PUS CALCcRYA�A lak'f10/�O�PDJ o� e CSTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 40/f 29- /2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local street throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #2 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $110,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Dudaet for 1991/9 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and ameral Overhead Delinquency Contingency Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 91/92 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: Analysis: $10,460.00 $5,000.00 $9,870.00 $1,800.00 $113.530.1111 $140,660.00 $40,030.00 511.87000 $192560.00 $177.940.00 The most significant impact on the proposed FY 92/93 budget is the increase in electricity costs of over $30,0011 to a projected annual cost of over $110,000. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 92193 Assessment Rate; For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $29.30. That is up $990 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The follcoving itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Und L_ e Unit Trve No. of Unit Units Rate Rate/ Commercial Acre Facttr 318.52 $29.30 2 (< Revenue $58.611 $18,670.00 Single Family Parcel 5,436,fN1 $29.30 1 $29.30 $159.270.011 Total 5,754.52 $177,940.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2 .a ; , , f HILLS iu 1 ♦ BANYAN 188W 7J OK 19M 9Y: ROM SERUM WAME" cis of HON M OP R" CW"NCA WM5L ffit. also ♦PALL` iV now A f- Iexo` 1 AIE Ii MVY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA i� ♦ MY wrs �_ r mDMT WMARY SLD2 ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 14192 -1 26 AU ANNEXED MAY 15 1991 TR 13114 21 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 TR 14866 47 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 CUP 8828 1.04 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1991 IN 13113 2.0 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13703 55 AU EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 + LEGEND ® CITY NAINSAINLD AAYA N. -,.s. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA T, 14192-1 FXHIBI: 'Ar' e,cH�e�r a• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ® C.ITY MNNTAmm A"A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO " TR I 114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I Lff"UV �O aew uamxa rrnwr ur+r (rteaeu) O WCAIYITJS MA d"TA svrM ME Cop weu) o uaw►ueAQ 3TV%AdlF4L0k gIBOVAo SMUT IM CII eACN) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tll 1496 G COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' QUANTITIES TREES — 3 EXHiSIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 APN 208 - 261 -20 ,. i S S� Ae � �1I I II ti I E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA MALACHITE AYE E %MI &T `A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 -1 ------ ----- -- -- I r a �•+� 'I c W ul LEGEND Existing Homes CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PM 13113 STATE OF CALIFORNIA E %MI81T •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND f 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48149 50 38 51 37 52 1 36 24 23 10 9 53 25 22 11 8 54 35 26 21 12 7 34 27 20 13 6 ' 33 28 19 14 5 J, 1 32 29 18 15 4 31 30 17 16 3 2 LEGEND CITY C.J REEASAINTAINED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA - 703 - Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Repoli Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division S of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No 3 (SLD q3) is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Charnel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals for a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development projects approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. I— tli7[T.iSCR•SiRil The majority of the budgeted costs for SLID 93 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $70,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for by 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will he transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLID 83 are as follows: agpgsed Maintenance B ditgt f_gr 1992[93 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $0,!p Contract Services AIL Revenue $59,48 $5,840.00 Traffic Signal Adjustment $0,00 General Liability $1,170.00 Electric Utilities $7066000 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $71,830.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $27,800,00 Delinquency Contingency 58.370 00 Total Revenue Required: $108,000,00 Add: Deficit Recovery _ $91990, Assessment Revenue Required: $117990,00 Analysis: The assessment rate for this district reflects an inflationary increase in costs. However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this rill not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 201 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $29.74. That is up $9.74 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Land Use Unit No. of Unit Tyne units Rte Rate/ Commercial Factor Acre 98.26 $29.74 2 AIL Revenue $59,48 $5,840.00 Single Family Parcel 3.77Iw $29.74 1 $29,74 $11215000 Total 3,869.26 IUL99000 STREET FIGHTING MAINTENANCF DISTRICT 3 5 CMM M APAl1. 195E U RUMMY= UPPaw W YAM NG➢IkIOA fJlq WIML Olt 2150 E �xo � �- ■ ?I Q <I <I 9•SEI u 1 •MO` , XVY I CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,MONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA r • CRY LABS Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light 6aintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972), .r Backgrou d; Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD 94) is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the Citv. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD p4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. However, this amount is down by about $3,000 from FY 91/92. Other costs are down (Maintenance and Operations down W,(W) in order to keep costs in line with the assessment rate of $27.72. The reason for this will be discussed below in the Analysis section of the report. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91 /92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD R4 are as follows: E12lMgd 11 ' t B dg t or 1992/93 Unit Tyne Total Personnel $58,160.00 Maintenance anti Operations $10,000,00 Contract Services $55.44 $49,490.00 Traffic Signal Adjustment $5,000,00 General Liability $810.00 Electric Utilities 54Z.270.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $121,240.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $17,360,00 Delinquency Contingency 91.19000 Total Revenue Required: $139,790.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover L 131.200,0 0) Assessment Revenue Required: $108590.00 Analysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget which exceed the inflation rate. However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas 'Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 92N3 A essment Rate, For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $27.72. That is up $7.72 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Latin Use Unit Tyne No. of Unit Units Rate Eacbpr Rate/ A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 892.59 $27.72 2 $55.44 $49,490.00 Single Family parcel 1131,Qp $27.72 1 $27.72 $59.1000D Total 3,024.59 $108-90.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4 L---------------- - - - - -, ° I 1 1 1 1 nILLSI Df RD 1 1 VI LSaN AYE 1 BANYAN - SI IL NIGXL AMp 1 AYE < <I ELIxE < RD full 1 F - - FDp 1X1 LL BLVD _ ARPDV HVi O&M m em In BY umm p9G1smylas BRPAIw ¢ Br ROM ff-V I 4 9&1651 Cft, = CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1 °° I 1 1 :es Ws r ® aJfWT BIWA4Y SL04 ANNEXATIONS ARREXED JUNE 1971 27.74 AU y ANNEXED ER 20, 1991 RNO9 116 AU ANNEXED 20, 1991 TWAMBER 197 AU ANNEkEO COYOTE RE YCM 1 ELE11 6.88 Ail ANNEXED MARCH 6 1991 TR 13355 -1 R AU EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND .4 J .16C f .a NC ]J31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Pry l2aa,s 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA r J .16C f .a NC ]J31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Pry l2aa,s 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 VISTA PAR"AY f \\ l 0 Ia1(G"Il'G� J 31 S 9 i NEC A/+[.WOSGAPE ARGA 6219 S.F. ASSRSARIT DI►GIM 6AIDSCAPR A►IITRIAICR DISTRICT 10. I TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 ) li I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO C TR 132-5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSNSSNBNT DIAGRAN-UNDSCA. NAIITRIINCR DISTRICT NO. 4 WEST GREENWAY TRAIL ?OR. PCL. 21 P.N. 10295 I QUANTITIES : TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA : 13.500 S.F. HNDSCAPE AREA : 9,120 S.F. GROUND COYER AREA 4,380 S.F. ( 4" THICK SHREDDED MULCH 5 GAL. SHRUBS : 469 EA. Ms. wr 1. Tn. No. 2202 - -77 RCJLLE. 1' l00' 0 a m Fix FC1.. 2 I -I.W -11.`� • dt it ':U 0, "0 -c7 10 -1 ' -JJ �L ;I"' HII O1 J': IM N11 .O9;[ I -.I- m ( 8OIZAV via 04 ISBN 'SAY Nis IOIA b Saaass uDsnH3 0 W t '0N inNiSIO BONVNB un IdVOS0NV7 MV19VIU iNINSSISSV 414, ks f �I ASSISSN( DIAGIAN LAIDSCAPS NIIITI1110E DISTRICT I0. 4 a �\ �\� \ TR. NO. 13717 its .. \� a a' `C ILI IVIIII SPIICI lvalol CIOICI STIBIT rr.LlclMttwoo Uik.) 1 EA. ST.LIOIIf(9300 WN,) - G EA. 3 EA. ST. LIMMtSwO LAN.) 12 G ST, TREQ(15 GAL.) 73 CA. 50 CA. 1B EA PARKWAY LANOSCAPIMG 17,300 S,P. 9.400 S.P, 3,570 5 "a" : ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE ONLY FOR 771E PARKWAYS ADJACENT TO TRACT N0. 13717. EXHIBIT "A" 3 n: ASSESSUN4 DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10. 4 COYOTE CANYON IELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ITERRn V/SrA P,*^"cW^Y I IT4 __ r77T % %%%7TT%T� %pp%pp�ppTry%177i';y q 1'7_ � i 1 I C ° I COYOTE CANYON i ELEM. SHOOL SITE j OU�Nry r /GS 7U/«' 500 s.r! 540 4 EXHIBIT •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 l.9 vI� r' + CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STAT9 OF CALIFORNIA I-Ig l l Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 y (Caryn Planned Community) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD H5 is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting .Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLID q5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,0)0. While this amount is up compared to FY 91/92, the overall operating budget is down by over $2,000 in order to keep costs in line with the assessment rate of $33.19. The reason for this will be discussed below in the Analysis section of the report, A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during n 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a max;mum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLID #5 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for1992/93 Total Personnel 50,00 Maintenance and Operations $12,780.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $520.00 Electric Utilities $2733000 Operations and Capital Subtotal: _ $40,630.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $8,790.00 Delinquency Contingency $2,730. Total Revenue Required: $52,150.00 Less: FY 91,192 Carryover ( $13 121),00) Assessment Revenue Required: $38,930.00 Analysis: Projected increases in electricty charges as mentioned above has the most significant impact on the increase in the assessment rate. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. rT 2&23 Assessment Kate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $33.19. That is up $13.19 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ land Use Tyne Units Rate Factor AU. Revenup Single Family Parcel 1.173 $33.19 1 $33.19 $38.930, Total 1,173.00 $388 910 00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 5 all Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial /Industrial) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial /industrial) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial /Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD 46) is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial cr commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has riot been funded with Street 1 fight District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLID #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $14000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLID #6 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1992/9'a Total Personnel $7,860.00 Maintenance and Operations $2,500,00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $6,580.00 General Liability $250.10 Electric Utilities $10,450.00 Capital Improvements: Street Light Installation 313000 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $30,770.10 Assessment .Administration and General Overhead $3,720.00 Delinquency Contingency 51,950.00 Total Revenue Required: $36,440.00 Less: FY 91/92 Caryover f 89.870.10) Assessment Revenue Required $26.570W r nsxly5 t1 There are no significant increases in the budget beyond inflation. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $31.21. That is up $11.21 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ e Tvoe Units Rate Fachtr A.U. Remernig Family Acre 851.41 $31.21 1 $31.21 $26570.W 851.41 2$ 6570.00 STREET' LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 6 1p 1 1 aHLAND` I. L is, L9E M Z3 APK M BY m DVAR D➢R 7 W& exr Mum 2W =5- 0191 r -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 11Ai1II MII L.I! �I ® 0OXT BOW fBp MILL BLVD MROW 0 XV1 =5- 0191 r -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 11Ai1II MII L.I! �I ® 0OXT BOW SL06 ANNE %AT INS ANNEXED MAY 5 1991 Ml PM 1.17 AU ANNEXED OCTOBER 16, 1991 CUP 91 -11 2.38 AU ANNEXED DECEMBER 18, 1991 DR M -09 1.06 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 CUP 89.26 9.92 AU ANNEXED MARCH 20, 1991 OR 90-05 9.06 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, 1992 OR 89 -13 .93 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 19, 1992 OR 89 -12 4.4 AU V .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND.6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5782 HAVEN AVE"NE STATE OF CALIFORNIA p4Tp r,gKe :•;$ ^,i^ EXHIBIT 'A• s%SSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 fl uI �I �--- -- 9595 GUCA5 N Rr41ycll RIO V FOUPTH ErRSETi NO, ^� STREST TRE4S - 2 EA, E41C,4GY10,rr1S N/C.90L/✓ 5r1p,fE7' LIGHT - NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA cUP 9i -ii I SESSMENT DIAGIi M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 e Elm AveMuf C:TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO S7Xj s C3 CAL37CiRNIA CAMMI T 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 S /TE STREET L /GHTS 2 EA 5rReer TREES 7 E.4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CUp 69 -2E STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT .A. 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6 5 /TE 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DR 90-05 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND S. /4r F. •'• \\•\��yw u4ioo 1 .M yw •� X10 4 '~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOt " COUNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO -OR STATE OR CALIFORNIA EXHISIT •A• ASSESSME'.-47 DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5. ^'i N//V%fi sr t `ll I n �f n LEGEND v q. 26Ti gOU�c P�Q 4 FF ION Iq � cr J q -J3� a� STREET LIGHTS /BA /"fsoo L j STREET TREES 9E4 PY�'�'5 cA[LERYA -�j•4 /,9.PADPOROJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN RERNARDINO i OrP29 -/2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report ,o Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Sheets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD u7) is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local sheets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. the majority of the budgeted costs for SLID k7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A Delinquency Continga.,,/ amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that poi tion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLID #7 are as follows: F_opo d M ' t Budget for 199Y93 Total Personnel $000 Maintenance and Operations $200 Contract Services ,00 Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.W General Liability $20000 Electric Utilities 51177000 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $12,170.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $6,450.10 Delinquency Contingency 51 41000 Assessment Revenue Required $200 x,00 Analysis, The increase in electricity costs is due to a projected increase in Edison charges along with an increase in the number of street lights being taken over for maintenance. FY 92/93 Assgssmgnt Rate, For FY 92/93 the rate rte- assessment ii-'t �s $3332. That is up $1.16 from the FY 91/92 rate of $32.16. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Lke c Udh Rate Fact t A Revenue Single Family Pa -- rcel 601,0( $33.32 1 $33.32 $20.030.[1(1 Total 601.00 $20,030.00 j STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 7 ,; all 1 , 1 xuismcL xo 1 NYY a m m AM i� ft CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA qRVM DEPUT ;E aVM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 2 " CALIFORNIA aY ws <I 1 F& S:OY ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 T 14139 120 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14380 n AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TN 14399 35 AU N 3 n N 3 A v y 0 N O M I 1 3 vii - N n P n - p r' . n n n a N [) m f• mn m m a r m f r r I r r r f n m jO m �tf n m u m n g o A f � N ry O N m � O N p O N p m O O ziII— z cWi `? N r p N w�Z f IWI N n N Q V MX ly <w<T J m J O 5~ J A� ■ 01 "= i �i f n � f m N N a t� 4 zm Om U O U Z �ZM 4 1� fit ��l m ionoo f H 4003901 m P I m r m N m m m � P I T m P O r n P n r m P f N r n n f r m f n 0 W r C m N [) m f• mn m m a r m f r r I r r r f n m jO m �tf n m u m n g o A f � N ry O N m � O N p O N p m O O ziII— z cWi `? N r p N w�Z f IWI N n N Q V MX ly <w<T J m J O 5~ J A� ■ 01 "= i �i f n � f m N N a t� 4 zm Om U O U Z �ZM 4 1� fit ��l r m m N N [) m f• mn m m a r m f r r I r r r f n m jO m �tf n m u m n g o A f � N ry O N m � O N p O N p m O O ziII— z cWi `? N r p N w�Z f IWI N n N Q V MX ly <w<T J m J O 5~ J A� ■ 01 "= i �i f n � f m N N a t� 4 zm Om U O U Z �ZM 4 1� fit ��l ASSESSM/ -DIAGRAM ' JnrW,4aNn,Wmgr I,wrcver/xrNa/•r I I i JJ J,6 ��,• J7 26 / >y IA JO /i JB J9 >o 29 J/ JS JO >9 I 26 I 56 >B 6 63 11 24 ' V Jl 6o 64 • JB p G 6J 66 I � T '� l2 l0 67 69 68 l 20 \ lI , C4 \♦ /J lB • z 1 /0 \ J \\ \\ B 1 LEGEND , • 5800 ttAAvv srRErr tr rs ro BE W"rAAEe Br SrREEr tZr o 9500 t t•EN wNJENAWX asnwr arY of RANC/!o CUGAmaAfoA SrREEPUONr/NG _ ENGINEER$ INC AG /NTENANCEEXN /e? TRACT No. w8o •�� +��r �r�•w �ruau.ir�rru.r�r.� yll r -5 -9/ •� CE B. f1I (.[4 �� Sr. i• 9pyJ3�.p� ASSESSMENT D/AGRAA, srt¢rLIaNr7sa AwNriwANcr DIsrw/cr,va 1A7 s l LEGEND . 3800 L 4A2N R.£il" r0 r MED B B£ srB££r L/ r O 95004LA45N MA"r£NAAfZ as rNKr 5 / s ^I r I e \ 9 / / j4 Kas !o It j o 3 /z \�\ zo \ "" "" C1 rY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET L/OMMO -- NA/NTENANC£ EXHIFIr S. ENGINEER INC rRACTNO. 14.779 .,-- .e.,........ .....o.�... . wiI r.5_� r..r Cfd a•ats r sf. 90�J5-Ad z? !H 1 / /. z zJ I o ?I /7 zJ z6 z7 IN ?9 Jo y I Jz JJ "" "" C1 rY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET L/OMMO -- NA/NTENANC£ EXHIFIr S. ENGINEER INC rRACTNO. 14.779 .,-- .e.,........ .....o.�... . wiI r.5_� r..r Cfd a•ats r sf. 90�J5-Ad Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD 48) is used to fund the maintenance and /or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by. development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pz4J1=d9o9ts the majority of the budgeted costs for SLD a8 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equai the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD 48 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance B lid get for 1992193 Total Personnel $0,00 Maintenance and Operations $130.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0,00 General Liability $50.00 Electric Utilities 83.86000 Operations and Capital Subtotal! $4,040.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $520.00 Delinquency Contingency $000 Assessment Revenue Required $4560.00 Analysis: In FY 91/92 there was only one parcel paying into SLD k8. It has been determined that, with the inclusion of 35 additional parcels into the district and the accompanying street lights, the unit cost will still be approximately the same resulting in an assessment rate of over $125. While typically it would be expected that the assessment rate would drop as more units are added, it was found that the total budgeted amount for FY 91/92, and therefore the resulting assessment, was in fact understated and that the budget did not cover required costs of the district. Maintenance and Operations and General Liability were less than the required amount. The FY 92/93 budget reflects these required costs and results in an assessment rate of $126.31. FY % 95sens MD t Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $12631. That is up $4.39 from the FY 91/92 rate of $121.92 due to the above stated reasons. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ land Use Tvce U is Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel a6A $126.31 1 $126.31 $4.560 W Total 36.00 $4,560.00 r STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8 L---------------- - - - - -, 1 1 1 _ _ nu LSmE qo 1 � NI— 1 BNNYNN�_ SI 1 i W ► nI GHLIND` pE IpIX� 1 BASEL AXE R 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 e AAl� LV5 j ri ] L rrrs nggovl I Nurj ® UfiTRCi RIM 1 CRUM 23 M,M BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ccis ON "� °�PA1N°" SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY �( ] F O " HOF F-I_-�J SOB ANNEXATIONS r ANXET'E➢ TAN % 515 1992 35 .W ASSESSMENT DIAGRA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT $ t LEGEND J DENOTES LANDSCAPE AREA j OFNOTES SIDEWALK DE!.OTES STREET LIGHT DENOTES TREES . .I.I.�.I r w A r � , 1 >, � . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA AN I a I. I. d' I� IRE AEA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA AN I a I. I. 7R 13945 VORT EXHIBIT SCALE 1 :200 ^ d' AEA r • • a t N 1 7R 13945 VORT EXHIBIT SCALE 1 :200 ^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: %lay6,1992 TO: Mavor, Members of the City, Council and City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda F. Hackett, Associate Engineer Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE, 17,1992, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2,3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. I2f,SQM� It is recommended that City Council approve the Preliminary Engineer's Reports and set a Public Hearing for June 17, 1992, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, water charges are increasing for all districts due to a combination of a rate increase of 30% for domestic and 46% for agricultural by Cucamonga County Water District, effective July 1, 1992 and in some districts an increase in the amount of landscape area to maintain. In addition, some districts are accepting landscape areas into the district without annexing additional assessment units to off set the costs, An example of this is the south half of Foothill Medians from Haven to Rochester into LMD 3B. in prior years the maintenance for these median islands was bourne by the developer. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessment below the annual assessments revenue requirements, in some districts this carryover no longer exists resulting in an increase in the assessment rate. The following, along with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 92/93 rates as compared with Current FY 91/92 rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used tc reduce rates. A IhXhnquencv Contingency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies in tax payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the dishict can be transferred to cover required expenditures. However, if the delinquencies are as Protected, various required maintenance activities will not have available funding which may result in reduced service levels. L.aLSJsSdpe Mantenan District No 1 - General City the recommended rate of $72.47 from $69.95 reflect increased water rates and inflation costs and the acceptance of East and West Beryl Parks into the District. These costs must support the increase park area of Ill acres along with the additional 3.86 acres of ground cover, shrubs and turf 0 Landscape 11aintenance District No. 2 - V'ctorMa Planred CommurYT The recommended rate of $405.30 from $376.10 reflects increased water rates and inflation costs. LMD #2 has the largest landscape area of anv district in the City with 118.62 acres, of which 2.'.511 acres is parks. [an s a Afaintenance District \ - HycgT The recommended rate of $393.04 from $37938 reflect the water rates and inflation costs of the district. Lanndacape '.Maintenance 2WIri t No 3b -Commercial /I d tr' l The recommended rate of $347.08 from $248.99 reflect increases in water rates and inflation costs. In addition, 1.95 acres of ground cover, turf and shrubs have been added to the district, this includes the south half of Foothill Medians from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. 'a��pg�ta'ntenan- D'ct ' t N 4- T V' t The recommended rate of $248.24 from $240.18 reflects increased water rates and inflation costs. In addition, Milliken Park, a 7 acre facility and 3.42 acres of ground cover ,turf and shrubs were accepted into the district to be maintained. Laridiupe Maintenance District No - Tot Lot The recommended rate of $108.78 from $105.00 reflects water rates and inflation costs of the district. Lytndscape Maintenance D strict N � 6 - a The recommended rate of $243.96 from $235.48 reflects water rakes and inflation costs of the district. Laadaapg Maintenance District No 7 - North Ptiwanrla The recommended rate of $305.43 will not increase for the FY 92/93. Landscape 4aintenance District No A South Ffiwanda The recommended rate of $150.45 from $145.22 reflects water rates and inflation costs for the district and does no exceed the current C.P.I. of 4.2%. Respectfully Submitted, .C� / /_EC Won. Joe O'Neil City Enginm.r Attachments: Resolutions Engineers Reports RESOLUTION NO. q� _ / 8,�- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8 FDA THE FISCAL YEAR /992/1993 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Existing and Proposed Work, SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 through 8, inclusive, for the fiscal year 1992/1993 for the maintenance and operation of (I) existing and previously approved improvements including those parkways, medians, paseos, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed of record subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said districts and (II) proposed additional improvements which include West Beryl Park and East Beryl Park facilities, Milliken Park and the medians on Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. Said maintenance and operation shall include costs to "maintain" and "service" the improvements as those terms are defined in Sections 22531 and 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code, Said Costs shall also include the administration and supervision required to provide such maintenance and service. Location of Existing and Proposed Improvements. SECTION 2: The existing improvements to be maintained and serviced are located —wMln the public right -of -way and landscaping easements delineated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 through 8, inclusive." The proposed additional improvements are located within publicly owned lands delineated in the report of the City Engineer. Description of Assessment Districts. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is—ooi more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. JUNE 17, 1992 PAGE 2 Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 "-, "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. A ", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reports of Engineer. SECTION 4: The City Council by Resolution No. has approve t e annual report of the City Engineer which report con a ns t e following. a. Plans and Specifications for the maintenance and services to be provided to the existing and proposed improvements. b. An estimate of the costs of providing the maintenance and service for the existing and proposed improvements. c. Diagrams of the assessment districts, including any zones within any of the assessment districts. d. An assessment of the estimated costs of providing the maintenance and service for the existing and proposed improvements, including the method of assessment. The report, entitled "Annual Engineer's Report ", is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Reference is made to such report for a full and detailed description of the existing and proposed improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the various assessment district. Time and Place of Hearing. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 17th day of June 1992, at the hou-r-o-FTMO P.M. in the City Council Champers of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1992 -1993. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the time set for the hearing and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of the protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll as the owner of the property for which the protest has been filed, such protest must contain or be accompanied by written U� C_ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. JUNE 17, 1992 PAGE 3 evidence that such singer is the owner of the property so described Landscaoina and LTahtina Act of 1972. SECTION 6: All work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention. SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Go—v—e—r—nm—e-nr Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City o — n;:ar�o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. �rI) RESOLUTION NO., /d — /J� y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE :OISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and /or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows; 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1992/93 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. 8 E Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Equestrian Trails) Fiscal Year 92193 The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Equestrian Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #D represents 1,147,954 square feet of landscape area and 25 acres cf parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, entry monuments, equestrian trails and parks. The 25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres and 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, which are being added to the district this fiscal year. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projgded Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD al are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City 's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. The protected costs to operate and maintain LMD pt are as follows: 2LU 22M Ground Cm er and Shrubs 17.73 21.47 Turf 135 1.47 Parks 5.00 25.00 Equestrian an Trails 10 LQp Total Area in Lb1D k1 31.08Acres 54.94 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projgded Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD al are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City 's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. The protected costs to operate and maintain LMD pt are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget fur 1992/93 No. of Units Regular Payroll $71,170.00 Fringe Benefits $24,910.00 Maintenance and Operations $43,890.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $16,310.00 Contract Services 1257, Landscape and Tree Masinterance $222,00(1.(10 Capital Expenditures To La I s Tree, Shrub & Ground Cover Replacement $4,640.00 General Liability $6,280.00 Water Utilities $153,240.00 Electric Utilities $16040.00 Subtotal: $558,480.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $96,170.00 Delinquency Contingency Total Revenue Required: y735,290.On Less: 91/92 District Carryover <$42,220,00> Assessment Revenue Required $693,070.00 For 92/93 the district budgeted $4640.00 routine tree shrub and ground cover repair. No vehicle or quipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $80,640.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district, if these back taxes are paid by the property owners, this money could be used for capital improvement projects within the district such as the installation of moisture sensors and controiler at Beryl Park. Analysis: Budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #1 increased from $573,010 in 91/92 to $735,290 in 92/93. This increase can be attributed to an increase of 3.74 acres of landscape area and the addition or East and West Beryl Parks to LMD #1. These parks will add an additional 20 acres of maintained area to the district. FY 92/93 Assessmentlgte: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit Land Use Tyre No. of Units Assess. Rate Unit Rate/ Factor A.U. Reveptg Single Family Parcel 7,(92 $72.47 1.0 $72.47 $510,450 Multi -Family Parcel 1257, $72.47 0.5 $36.24 $182.624 To La I s 8,805 $693,070 j LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT I ;r HILLSI( 1 1 1 � 1 Bxxvxx R C8E m 21 of IN BY. RRBDURa SE VICE DRPAMW GM DIYmON M ADI '"'M D """A A W25k W 2W r •q0< __ _ 1 eVE J�BASELqf�< 5 it u� WI i 5� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1s K ` ) CDY ILLS EMO I ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 14192.1 26 AS ANNEXEO MAY 15 1991 TR 13114 21 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 TR 14866 47 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13 70 3 55 AV ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PM 13113 2.0 AU ASSESSMEfiT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 + LEGEND ® CIT! NAINTAINO AA[A N.T. >. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TP. EXH:O:' "A" '-' ERHIBIr •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 EM CITY MNNTAINED AREA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR 13114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I L%GLIV -"xi --mv umoxv SKEET 4)Ml7 (limem) Q tJ[ALY"J! MA "TA O LIGL�p►Ms�t fT'It�CIF 04� �A/frvM.� Tm CII E,KN) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TKA4T COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 14846 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2m 39 40 411 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 I � 51 38 52 37 24 23 10 9 53 36 25 22 11 8 54 35 26 21 �, 12 7 I 34 27 20 13 6 1 33 28 19 14 5 1 32 29 18 15 4 2 31 30 17 16 3 I LEGEND ®CITY MAINTAINED AREAS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r TR. 13703 STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- -- EXHIBIT W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 !. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 I;If.` •r' ICI t � .i al II 1 1 i D.IVa s Hnaw11 1 Mf O •� ` � i LEGEND Existing Homes CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 92f93 The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Di ^ision 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD 42) represents landwape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paws, equestrian trails and parks. The 27.5 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyan Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projected Costs. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 areas follows: 91 /92 2ZM Ground Cover and Shrubs 45.28 47.99 Turf 38.53 40.13 Parks 27.50 27.50 Equestrian Trails 3,QQ 3,t)Q Total Area in LMD #2 11431 Acres 118.62 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projected Costs. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 areas follows: > a t Regular Payroll $282,400.00 Part Time Salaries 4,650,00 Fringe Benefits $98,840.00 Maintenance and Operations $30,000.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $10,000.00 Contract Services 1.0 Landscape and Tree Maintenance $575,000.00 Capital Expenditures Acre Tree, Shrub & Ground Cover $405.30 Replacement $12510.00 Irrigation Renovation 4,880,00 General Liability $13,920.00 Water Utilities $420,000.00 Electric Utilities $2000000 Subtotal: $1,472,200.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $142,070.00 Delinquency Contingency 112LIKN Total Revenue Required: $1,809,660.00 Less: 91/92 District Carryover <$17L040.00> Assessment Revenue Required $1,638,620.00 For 92/93 the district budgeted $12510 for routine tree, shrub and ground cover repair and $4880 for irrigation renovation. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $195,390, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district, if these back taxes are paid by the property owners, a portion of this money will have to be used to cover additional water costs and any excess funds could be used for capital improvement projects within the district. Analysis: In FY 91/92, the Assessment rate for LMD 42 was $376.00, this will increase to $405-30 for the 92/93 FY is to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. EY_9n9 Assessment Rate The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Single Family Parcel 3,763.(X) $405.30 1.0 $405.30 $1,525,140 Multi- Family Parcel 124.00 $405.30 1.0 $405.30 $50,260 Commercial Acre 15.74 $405.30 2.0 $810.60 $12,760 Vacant Acre 998,00 $405.30 0.25 $101.33 859,9{,9. TQJAL8 4,400.74 $16388 620 I 1 - 1 1 I 1_ 1 1 1- IT1 1 1 �I 1 1 , ill I�� I Q U � O H Q � U O � C O Z CLr � � U O U 'c Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga + Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) Eiscal Year 92/93 The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the St.ests and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bac ngr und• Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (LMD 43a) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 91!91 22M Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.14 Turf 9.l)D QM Total Area in LMD W3a 0.14 .Acres 0.14 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD Ua are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD p3a are as follows: 1111MMMilm agumurr r Regular payroll $30.00 Fringe Benefits $10.00 Maintenance and Operations $210.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $0.00 Contract Services landscapeand Tree Maintenance $1,850.00 Capital Expenditures Irrigation Renovation $4,580.00 General Liability $40,00 Water Utilities $800,00 Electric Utilities $120.00 Subtotal: $7,640.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $280.00 Delinquency Contingency $220.00 Gross Revenue Required; $8,140.00 Less; 91/92 District Carryover <$4.990.00> Total Revenue Required: §3,150,00 For 92/93 the district budgeted $4,580.00 irrigation renovation. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency ir, an amount of $220.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district, if these back taxes are paid by the property owners, this money could be used for capital improvement projects within the district Analysis: In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD #3a was 37938/A.U. This will increase to $393.04 for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district This assessment rate does not exceed the current C.P.I. of 4.27. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district; Unit Rate /. [And Use— Industrial Parcel 8 393.04 1.0 $393.04 $3,150500 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRIC`1' 3A 1 ----------------0------ 1 - ; 1 1 , 1 nuLSI OE � Ro 1 _exxixxL st �W.IA All 1 '1 zI BxSEIIYE I\ iI SI I.-ILL SL✓U I _ ♦RROY HYY XI{'11 ' LL J •�I _ _ _6tX SI WAM 23 MU W BY T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESM Gm IN" '� °�'�"� SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 4) Wft U. 2 " CALIFORNIA 1-- j 1 1 1 i 1 CRY LYI$ 1 '!I�ilil i Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial /Industrial) Fiscal Year 1992 /93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial /Industrial Maintenance District) The FY 92/93 annual report for landscape Maintenance District No. 31, (Commercial /Industrial Maintenance District) Is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. 31, (LMD 43b) represents landscape sites throughout file Commercial; Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district, Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 91/92 22L43 Crowd Cover and Shrubs 4.42 5.95 Turf 2.8Z 122 'Dotal Area in LMD #3b 7.29Acres 9.24 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. ProieR The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3b are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. A portion of the budget. -d costs are for the maintenance for the south half of the median islands on Foothill Blouevard born Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. These maitenance areas will be added to the oishict this fiscal year. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3b are as follows Proposed —Majalfflance 8 dg+ t 'or 1992/93 Regular Payroll 5204000 Fringe Benefits $710.00 '.laintenance and Operations $'15,000.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,030.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance $136540.00 Capital Expenditures Tree,Shrub and Groud Cover Replacement $0.00 General Liability $3190.00 Water Utilities $39,470.00 Electric Utilities 59,9211.(Nl Subtotal: $207,900.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $33,350.00 Delinquency Contingency $0.00 Gross Revenue Required: $241,250.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit $146.750.00 Total Revenue Required: &388,1100.00 Analysis: in the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD #3b was 248.99 /A.U.,this will increase to $347.08 for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. hY 97/93 Asseegsment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ Lind UH Tyne Unit Rate Factor A I Reve r Industrial /Comm. Acre 1117.9 $347.08 1.0 $347.08 $388,( Totals c�cu I ;* J 3AV c N3NIT@ ' - - -- -' ✓ - Ul - YS i a =_ ' 3AV `iY9IHp1 1 - -f � 3AV iXVI 13Ntl 1 T g J6 1 ,' 3AV p NIA I i d z � d � U � U U O C o z H ccn mil IMD 39 ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED MAY ' 1991 PM MI 1.27 AU ANNEXED OCTOBER. 16, 1991 CUP 91.11 2.38 All ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 CUP 89 -26 9,92 AU ANNEXED MARCH 20, 1991 OR 90.05 9.06 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 RJR 88 -28 1.04 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, 1992 OR 89 -13 .93 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 19, 1992 OR 89.12 4.4 AU .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND fL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5792 HAVEN AVENUE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXH161T -A- ^SSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 O V �I In I JIB V� G FIFTH STrr - -= 9595 GUC,4E RANCf1 RD � FOURTH STREc T r - iYO. G� g rRAE % ?/Rf-E= - 2 EA. EUC,4L yP,'OS N/Cf10L N , y STiPEET L /Gf/T - NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CUP � � S7ATE OF CALIFORNIA W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO - CUP B9 -2E t STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHOT W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND-6 5/725 _�-_ it VMTM eTWSLT a CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r �- STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR vo-os J // ER MieIT •A• `( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AN" a ~f�_ S r, AV& , 'FR . EC- -�itE Mrs 4 1 CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OR CALIFORNIA 8XH181T •A• 6+.SSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 N INTH ST ov n Jx l RO 26T QV�.F -JP Z 6) e 1 FERON V LEGEND STREET LIGHTS /El4 D /,Sg00 LJ STREETTREES 9E4 i°yiPUS <.OLLERYAi4fl � ®�'•ao�a�Dl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �a COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). .cu.uyt)Imd1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments rewired for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos and parks. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. A portion of the budgeted costs are for the maintenance for Milliken Park, which is located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, one half mile north of Foothill Blvd. and the north half of the median islands on Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. These maintenance areas will be added to the district this fiscal year. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #4 are as follows: 91/92 92/93 Ground Cover and Shrubs 5.43 7.27 Turf 5.04 6.62 Parks 15a 7ZQQ Total Area in LMD #4 25.47Acres 40.89Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. A portion of the budgeted costs are for the maintenance for Milliken Park, which is located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, one half mile north of Foothill Blvd. and the north half of the median islands on Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. These maintenance areas will be added to the district this fiscal year. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #4 are as follows: Fop¢sect Maintenance Budget for 1992194 • Regular Payroll $244,030.00 Part rime Salaries $4,650.00 Fringe Benefits $85,410.00 Maintenance and Operations $66,560.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $85,200.00 Contract Services Ac ra Landscape and Tree Maintenance $168,000.00 Capital Expenditures Vacant T ree,Shrub and Ground Cover Replacement $3,980.00 Terra Vista /Base Line Median Renovation $265,330.00 General Liability $5,540.00 Water Utilities $120,670.00 Electric Utilities §j315e.00 Subtotal: $1,072,520.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $78,550.00 Delinquency Contingency $12.140.00 Gross Revenue Required: $1,163,2100.00 Less: 91/92 District Carryover _ <S265330,00> Total Revenue Required: $897,880.00 For 92/93 the district budgeted $3,980.00 tree,shrub and ground cover replacement and $265,330 for the landscape renovation of the Terra Vista Parkway and Base Line Road Median Islands. The funds for this renovation come from the carryover of last fiscal year's district budget. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $12,140.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district, if these back taxes are paid by the property owners, this money could go towards a capital improvement project within the district. Analysis: In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD R4 was 240.18 /A.U.,this will increase to $248.24/A.U. for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. This assessment rate does not exceed the current C.P.I. of 4.2 %, this index is for the year ending March 31,1992. Attached is the Assessment Rate Computation Chart. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/ Single Family Parcel 1687.00 $248.24 $418,790 Multi Parcel 1921.00 $221.11 $424,750 Commercial Ac ra 137.15 $387.96 $53,210 Vacant Acre 31.10 $36.42 $1,130 TOT AL $89_7,_880 Maint. Cost Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land Medan Maintenance $71,830.561 $30,722.35 $34,983.78 $4,995.33 $1,129.10 Park Maintenance $6823911.32 $296$23.32 $337,653.40 $48,213.60 $0.00 Assessment Rate Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land $248.24 $221.11 $38796 $36.42 a LMD 4 Assessment Rate Computation FY 92193 Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land As,essment Units 1,687.00 11921.00 13715 31.00 (AU) tAU) (Ac) (AC) Benefit Ratio Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land Median Maintenance 1.00 2.1X) 2.1)0 Park Maintenance �1AX) 000 1.00 2.00 lLlXl 'arkwav Maintenance 1.1X1 0.50 0.01 (),IXI Benefit Units Single Familv Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land Median Maintenance 3,944 -30) 1,687.00 1,921.00 274.30 620X1 Park Maintenance 3,882.3Ci 107.00 1,921.11(1 27430 0.00 'arkwav Maintenance 2677.50 1.687.(X) 960.50 O.IX) 11.(x) %of Units Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vaomt land Median Maintenance 1WA%I 42.8% 48.7% ZO% L6% Park Maintenance 100.01% 43.5 495% 7.1% 0.O Maint. Cost Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land Medan Maintenance $71,830.561 $30,722.35 $34,983.78 $4,995.33 $1,129.10 Park Maintenance $6823911.32 $296$23.32 $337,653.40 $48,213.60 $0.00 Assessment Rate Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land $248.24 $221.11 $38796 $36.42 a -------------------- ---- - - - - -- LANDSCAPF MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4 XILLSIRE +� YILSON _AVE s - =r- - Si � eXI GHLAMD R ff F 5Htvm BBPoRw 94) MsM vi ll, l BI VD ARROW MYI S, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Lt� c" WS MJ ® D6T&T ammy -F LMO 4 AMNEXAT IONS ANNEXED JUNE 19, 1991 PM 13825 27.24 AU ANNEXED NOIEMBER 20, 1991 TR 13351 118 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 2O, 1991 TR 13717 197 AU ANNEXED SECTEMRER 18, 1991 COYOTE CANYON ELEM 6.88 AU ANNEXED MARCH 6, 1991 TR 13351.1 8 AU ANNEXED AUGUST 7, 1991 CUP 88-i2 0 AU EXHIBIT 'q• LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT MAINTE DEAD RRM No. a STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND.A I i I 1i>";_1 A.37 A At> CCCCCC �l-La 77�. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA i EXHIBIT •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 J T"RA QD a �I3 -W J _ I MgCNN LJ O�A��lA;6219 S.t: 6219 S -T- ISSEsDEl2 DI►6i111 L►IDSCIPE 111I1TE111cl DISTiIC2 10. 4 TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO iR STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSNENT DIICYIN- LINDSCI. NIINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 WEST GREENWAY TRAIL FOR. PCL. 1, P.N. 10195 QUANTITIES E. m H /TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA : 13.500 S.F. / HADSCAPE AREA : 9,120 S.F. 6 GROUND COVER AREA : 4,380 S.F. j r l 4° THICK SHREDDED NUIlH ) / /• 5 GAL. SHRUBS 469 EA. —TI WGLE. 0-- Lop• P. M. to »e UCL. a POC. ULM 1. TN. !W. 2203 Pct.. a lk� ASSESSNENT OIAGRAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 CHURCH STREET ( PRON ELN M. REST TO ELN ATE6UE 4 N m }yH', W 1 .r. I • f)(" ILn Wits in n -n .l lr:..•n rr: s" .'I . " -n.L -'I' 0,.0 it ' �76-8'I-I �f �I ASSRSSM( DIAGRAM LAMDSCAPR MIRTINARCR DISTRIC! R0. I �\� \ TR. NO. 13717 -..� --4VY su Avtlni SPRUCi 111191 ceoece S:RRSr ST.LIORft(16000 LUM.) ST.Lmr(ss00 LUM.) 0 G. ] G. Sr. LIONf(5000 LUM.) 12 G ST. TRm(1s GL.) 73 G. 50 G. 10 G ?AIRWAY LAMOSCAPING 17,300 S,P. 1.100 S.P. 3.570 5 IOI'R : ALL OUAWTITILS SIOWI AIR 0MLY POI TIC PARKWAYS A03ACDrr M TRACT N0. 13717. .A.. 6SSESS"M DIaGUN LUDSCAPE WITEEAECE DISTRICT 10. 4 y COYOTE CANYON IELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE i� - -- rz�qRn visrn PNAKW,4y I � ---- 77Tr7?TTl�Ti777TT�7�1I11Z 'fl�ilZ�'lni7� � I I COYOTE CANYON 8 ELEM. SHOOL SITE I OLfA.IV /riGS r Tt/ilqP Soo s.f J�,h;Ld 4 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 4 Ott ! ! CONTINUED U BELOW /4/� M!O/wN 4NC tC�I /NG ! (/�w, �/1�MA�• r Y�'rMd w�!•� 1 MV&A5 — ts, c7 S.f yearo r,rs r. 2c.oL ►+t L 11W/T5 OF WOT/r . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CUP 85 =/1 (� r STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 92193 The FY 9:/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped Tot Lot , located on the southwest comer of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the Tot Lot such that any benefit derived from the landscaping can be ditectly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessments reouired for this district are charged to those specific parcels. There is only one site maintained by the district. It consists of a Tot Lot and a small amount of shrubs beds and ground cover. The quanfifies of maintained areas consist of: 31!32 2 L23 Ground Cover and shrubs 0.33 0.33 Total Area in LMD #5 0.33Acres 033 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows: PrQpQsed Maintmance Budget f 1992 /93 Regular Payroll $80,00 Fringe Benefits $30.00 Maintenance and Operations $830,00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $70.00 Contingency Tree Replacement $50,00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance $2,470.00 Capital Expenditures Playground Equipment &Fence Renovation $15,830.00 General Liability $50.00 Water Utilities $260.00 Electric Utilities $130.00 Subtotal: $19,800.00 Assessment Administ -ation and General Overhead $580.00 Delinquency Contingency Gross Revenue Required: $20,730.00 Less: 91/92 District Carryover <$15.940.00> Total Revenue Required: $4 790.00 For 92/93 the district budgeted $15,830.00 for playground equipment and fence renovation, these funds are carryover from the current fiscal year budget. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $350.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district, if these back taxes are paid by the property owners, this money could be used toward a capital improvement project within the district. Analysis• In the FY 91,'92 the assessment rate for LMD M5 was $105.00/A.U.,this will increase to $108.78 for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. This assessment rate does not exceed the current C.P.I. of 4.2 %. This index is for the year ending March 31,1992. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate /. I ani Use Tyre Llri is Rate __Factor AU Re en Single Family Parcel 44 $108.78 LO $108.78 $4,786.32 LANDSCAPE MAINTENAN ,p 1 . . ... .. . . . .x.�� 1 XatsloE 1 1 L 19TH emm m AFRO. 1992 RY CmRR S TO war" Q 7l /IOf RANCHO CWU RCA 999-BSL fx. no I wl 4_ yl ¢1r � � 1 ST ILL- L-- ILL- L..J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CRY LIRS -- 4ti Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Eiscal Year 93193 The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article A, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD #6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, and paseos and . The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos arc maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD 46 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows. 91 /92 21M Ground Cover and Shrubs 12.09 12.09 Turf 2.89 2.89 Community Trails 1W LC20 Total Area in LMD #6 1289Acres 17.89Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos arc maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD 46 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows. 1 1• Regular Payroll $8,180.00 Fringe Benefits $2,860.00 Maintenance and Operations $9,920.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,910.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance $180,000.00 Capital Expenditures Irrigation Replacement $2,510.00 Plant Material Renovation $47,990.00 General Liability $3,080.00 Water Utilities $60,000.00 Electric Utilities $1,530,00 Subtotal: $317,990.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $27,280.00 Delinquency Contingency $27.740.00 Gross Revenue Required: $373,010.00 Less: 91/92 District Carryover _ <S97340.00> Total Revenue Requiredr $285,670.00 For 92/93 the district budgeted $2,510 for irrigation replacement and $17,990 for plant material renovation. The funds for this renovation come from the carryover of last fiscal year's district budget. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $27,740.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district, if these back taxes are paid by die property owners, this money could go towards a capital improvement project within the district. Analysis• In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD q6 was 235.48 /A.U.,this will increase to $243.96 /A.U, for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. This assessment rate does not exceed the current C.P.I. of 4.2 %, this index is for the year ending March 31,1992. EY 92/93 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate /. Land Use TVe Units Rate Factor AU Revenue Single Family Parcel 1,171.00 243.96 1.0 $243.96 $285,70.00 - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 6 I Iprrrrr— rrrr------ -r - - -, __ 1 / 1 RD / YnsoNAVE / _1 / I 1 AY CREATED 23 APRIL 1992 BY RUM cis DIMON 11 "KIT A AYE ` I I.MILL BLVp MRBY _ -. _ NVY Z i-- ® pSJI{iJ BGIIOARY rrr' r i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North) Ei6s;t Year 92/97 The FY 92193 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972), Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD N7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the Etiwanda North area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD 87 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed thn:ogh a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. 1 "he projected costs to operate and maintain LMD 87 are as follows: 2= 2ym Ground Cover and Shrubs 616 7.46 Turf 121 3.55 Community Trails 1.53. 2Af) Total Area in LMD k7 9.9OAcres 13.ol Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD 87 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed thn:ogh a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. 1 "he projected costs to operate and maintain LMD 87 are as follows: Regular Payrol! $2,120.00 Fringe Benefits $950.00 Maintenance and Operations $10,420.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,330.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance $137,490.00 Capital Expenditures $0.00 General Liability $2450.10 Water Utilities $16,030.00 Electric Utilities $740,00 Subtotal: $172,630.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $27580.00 Delinquency Contingency $101.560.1)n Gross Revenue Required: $301,770.00 Less: 91/92 District Carryover so,.QQ Total Revenue Required: $30x770.00 For 92/93 the district budgeted no capital improvement projects and no funds were available for carryover from last fiscal year's district budget. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $101,560.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district, if these back taxes are paid by the property owners, this money could go towards a capital improvement project within the district. Analysis: In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LbfD R7 was 305.434 /A.U.,this will not increase for the FY 92/93. It is estimated the the present rate will cover the current maintenance costs of the district. FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district, Unit No. of Rate /. . ni I Iv Tye U is Rate Factor A U Revenue Single Family Parcel 988.00 $305.43 1.0 $305.43 $301,770.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 7 1 __- -�..N. xuulBC .L..ixo 1 YILSON_AVE 1 / BAXYAX�__ � SI CWM a Been W BY. ea rm, DDIRT rxr 94� �.� All- 1 1 1 1 Cp LUIS . WNT BUM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA LM 7 ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED NOVEMSER 6, 1991 TR 14139 120 AU ANNEXED IOVEMEER 6, 1991 TR 14390 79 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 33 AU / 23 107 106 109 110 X It9 93 c 79 x 92 60 ° 59 '1 22 21 l I 20i I 19 1 18 1 17 1J 16 115 I t4 112 111 I 10 I 9 I B I 7 I 6 I 5 I 4 I 3 1 2 I 1 uff "r y.'_ ^rt•n9•rrr •r��ni.•r Eii� �;ll •y! J 1 ..IV IFiI 1� 1 N \• 1 14\r. 1•r •1s. � � _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRACT NO. 14139 F Q X 4 LOT "S" b 1 35 3 36 ♦4 1 46 47 4 41 49 50 N.T.S. - -- rr�7 34 1 13 — — 37 33 38 7 42 6 70 6 69 u 68 i 51 32 3 41 7 71 ° ° 39 i 72 6 w LANDSCAPE AREAS TO 3 31 1 v 4 °u 53 z BE MAINTAINED BY U U 4 p 81 B e e 73 B 86 r r 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 3 30 6 B5 8 66 DISTRICT. 1 100 99 9 54 4 29 101 ~ v w 11 2 102 74 B B4 8 87 6 65 5 114 110 97 7 75 55 27 1 103 9 93 F F B BB a a 64 26 1 116 0 0 0 82 8 89 6 0 56 z 112 1• � 63 _— a 25 105 117 5 77 B BI 9 90 6 57 3 106 111 9 r 24 1 118 8 80 s s 9 91 6 61 a 58 w LOT '•T•• ' ' 94 7 78 22 21 l I 20i I 19 1 18 1 17 1J 16 115 I t4 112 111 I 10 I 9 I B I 7 I 6 I 5 I 4 I 3 1 2 I 1 uff "r y.'_ ^rt•n9•rrr •r��ni.•r Eii� �;ll •y! J 1 ..IV IFiI 1� 1 N \• 1 14\r. 1•r •1s. � � _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRACT NO. 14139 F Q X 4 v a 2� A2 If hyo� Sp i= gF� I M Z fs 0 / O ( 2 r Ft i ASSESSMENTD/AGRAM,� L"ATCAPF& AIMM"M DISMCr MG LEGEND i LAAOSCARE AREAS 1 r0 BE ✓ANTANEO I BY LAMSCARE y ✓A YE TRIC7 P/7TiA OrY ✓ANTAA{D STREET rMr AREA Orr✓ANrAAED {, COA^N vrY rRAL rY Orr MANrAAED ELWN for J s• 6 1 \// r rf�B/ /O B /f�4 mcrNo. many arr or RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGiNEEN3, INC rRACrmo. mj7o r.Mrn.'.rr . nr .nre.rr..r. rrw Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No, S (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 r City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda Area) The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.8 (South Etiwanda Area) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. rrxr�tlL� The majority of the budgeted costs for LIVID #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LIVID #8 are as follows: 21192 921.93. Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.23 0.23 Turf 0.06 0.06 Community Trails QA USD Total Area in LNfD #8 0.29 Acres 0.29 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. rrxr�tlL� The majority of the budgeted costs for LIVID #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LIVID #8 are as follows: 1WRIMMIMORWir Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contingency Tree Replacement Contract Services Capital Expenditures Plant Material Renovation General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration and General Overhead Delinquency Contingency $2,970.00 $1,040.00 $2,630.00 $370.00 $840.00 $5,700.00 $3,910.00 $120.00 $710.0 $80. Subtotal: $18,370.00 $1,760.00 $39.0(1 Gross Revenue Required: $20,160.00 Less: 91/92 District Carryover _ <53.910.00> Total Revenue Required: $16,250.00 For 92/93 the district budgeted $3,910.00 for plant renovation as a capital improvement project, funds for this renovation are carryover from last fiscal year's district budget. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $30.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. Analysis: in the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD #8 was $145.22 /A.U.,this rate will increase to $150.45 for the FY 92/93. This increase in the assessment rate is needed to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. This increase does not exceed the current C.P.I. of 4:%, dus index is for the year ending March 31,1992. E)L92193 4 <essm t R t i The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate /. I ani U� Tvcie U.,rc Rite Facer t R v n Single Family Parcel 108.00 $150.45 1.0 $150.45 $16,250.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8 1 1 1 +_.OM BA _AN1 IVXt ANO_ _ AYE �' 191M ¢' IFODt HILL ft VD __ ANMOU HVV_�__ 1 1 •� � cm am N ® XWT B00W MRO S�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T a c e 3 APEL urBY. caINY ox SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY }_ 7 W"�'EXr` � " CALIFORNIA fl - LM8 ANN MT iQNS r ONNEXEO JANUARY 394 15, 1992 T 13945 35 NU 4SSESSMENT DI_AGRAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT _f�- LEGEND J DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES 0 DENOTES T•A c i3a43 LANDSCAPE AREA SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT TREES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TR 13945 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO vORT EXHIBIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA SCALE i.soo •A AN OIMIM4CE OF THE CITY COMCM OF THE CrIY OF RANCHO CUCAM]NSA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DI =CT WENOM 37T 92-01, SUBAREA F, AMENDING THE DMMOPIMM DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL. (8 -14 oW=MU UUM PER ACRE) TO IDW -MDI[M RFSIDENIIAL (4 -8 UAELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NMMU= COMM OF AIUM RCXLTE AND AR(R3B AVENUE, AND MAKDC FINDINGS IN SUPPOPT THeRIDF - APN: 208 -291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 UUVUiM 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27 A. Recitals. (i) On Dacalber 7, 1983, the City Council of the City of Parma Cxa=i9a approved the enactment of the Development Code through the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Develcpmr; District AmerxImnt No. 92 -01, Subarea F, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Developuent District AuexKber t is referred to as "the application." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning C,,.,,i = °im of the City of Rancho Ccamoga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -42 recammidirq to the City Camcil that the application be approved. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rands Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this OtTlinarae. (v) All legal prerequisitzs prior to the adoption of the Ordinance have ommred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THERETORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 15.33 acres of lard located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue and is developed with an automobile service station, single family residences, a crouch, and a motor home canpcRaud; said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre); and Ordinance No. 494 Page 2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Taw Residential (2 -4 shelling units per acre) and are developed with single family residences; the properties to the south are designated General Commercial and law Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with a commercial stopping center, civic building, and single family residences; the Properties to the east are designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units par acre) and are developed with a single family residence; the Property to the west is designated Office/Professional and is vacant; and (c) This amendment does not conflict with the land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for developmennt within the district in a canner consistent with the Gpxeral Plan, Developtant code, and with related development; and (d) This amadment praiotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea F of this application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation and are oonivatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the proximity of single family developments to the north and south of the subject property; and (f) This anmendmant would not have significant buupacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Envirctuentam sssessmnt. 3. This council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in ompliannee with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Cascil hereby approves Development District Amenimat 92-01, Subarea F, amending the Developmert Districts Map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Sow- Meditm Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow pmute and Axctlbald Avenue as shown in Edubit "A.^ 5. The Mayor small sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the sauna to be published within 15 days after its passagee at least nice in the Tnlard Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Paincho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPRWED, and ADOPM this 6th day of May, 1992. AYES: NOES: ABSE?7r: 6z p„7inanoe No. 494 Page 3 Damis L. Stmt, Mayor v9v�jgE Delay J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA, J. ADAM, CM CLERK of the City of Rancho Croamxga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordineroe was intro&xied at a regular meeting of the Cot=U of the City of Rancho Qwwwcp held on the lot day of April, 1992, and was finally passed at a regular meetirg of the City COW it of the City of Rancho Ctrmcp held an the 15th day of April, 1992. Ztearted this 16th day of April, 1992, at Rancho Qoaffiga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk P3 Ordinance No. 494 Page 4 r EXHIBIT "A" RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Svstcm Storntcvater Permit Implementation Aerc•ement, Santa Ana Region. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS On Fcbrutry 28. 1992, the City C.onncil's Public Works Subcommittee met with the City Engineer to re%dcw the proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elhrination Svstent (NPDES) and the Implementation Agreement. On Marcie 31. 1992, the Subcommittee provided the City Council',vItli a d review an analvsiS of the Implementation Agreement. In response to Con gressiont -Jly mandated requirements in the Federal Cleat Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a I• "inal Rulc regulating storm water cfischarges into the nation's watcrn•nys (10 CFR Parts 122, 123. and 124) in November 1990. In romplirmce with the Final Rule, the State Regional Water Quality C'onlrol Iiotird, Santa Ann Region (RNVQCB, SARI issued n permit to San Bernardino County for the regulation of storm water flowing into the Santa Ana River tram tributary creeks and flood control channels in the C'oliwv. 'I'hc permit nvues ibmf ho Cl and nlher cities in the Coruv_v trihntnn• to the Swrto Ma Ricer ns co-- pernittccs. h:ach City cal S'- l'IT'i OI' RANCIR) CUC'AMONGA STAFF REPORT _{ i 4� Date: Mac 6, 1992 To. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack L[mi, AICP, City Manager From: Win. •Joe O'Neil, City Engineer H;-- Sitund M. Dellhime, Management Analvst If S,rbject: ADOPTION OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE F,LIMINA "LION SYSTEM STORMWATER PERMIT "4P!,FMENTATION AGREF_MENT, SANTA ANA REGION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Svstcm Storntcvater Permit Implementation Aerc•ement, Santa Ana Region. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS On Fcbrutry 28. 1992, the City C.onncil's Public Works Subcommittee met with the City Engineer to re%dcw the proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elhrination Svstent (NPDES) and the Implementation Agreement. On Marcie 31. 1992, the Subcommittee provided the City Council',vItli a d review an analvsiS of the Implementation Agreement. In response to Con gressiont -Jly mandated requirements in the Federal Cleat Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a I• "inal Rulc regulating storm water cfischarges into the nation's watcrn•nys (10 CFR Parts 122, 123. and 124) in November 1990. In romplirmce with the Final Rule, the State Regional Water Quality C'onlrol Iiotird, Santa Ann Region (RNVQCB, SARI issued n permit to San Bernardino County for the regulation of storm water flowing into the Santa Ana River tram tributary creeks and flood control channels in the C'oliwv. 'I'hc permit nvues ibmf ho Cl and nlher cities in the Coruv_v trihntnn• to the Swrto Ma Ricer ns co-- pernittccs. h:ach City cal S'- either participate as a co- permittee or obtain their own permit from the RNVQCB, SAR. The fee for the comprehensive permit for Fiscal Fear 1992 - 1993 is 650.000. For Fiscal Year 1993 - 1994 the permit fee mac increase to $75,000. During the coming months a program to monitor, sample, and test stone water discharges will begin. The monitoring program includes eighteen monitoring sites. The monitoring will develop baseline data on water quality for the watershed. Attached is the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stortmvater Permit Implementation Agreement (Agreement). The intent of the Agreement is to distribute the costs associated with permit compliance equitably among the permittee and co- permittees. The costs also include: the annual permit fee, baseline storm water monitoring and testing, mapping, development of a Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP), preparation of Best Management Practices (BMPs), and administrative costs borne by the Countv 'transportation /Flood Control Department. The Agreement neither distributes penalties nor other costs associated with one jurisdiction's ncn- compliance to the others. Furthermore, it does not distribute one jurisdiction's costs for the NPDES' local implementation and enforcement to the others. Non- compliance by one jurisdiction is does not constitute non - compliance by all the parties. Therefore any penalties arising from a jurisdiction's nom- compliance -ue costs borne solely by the jurisdiction found to be in non - compliance. 'Pile program's cost for Fiscal Year 1992 - 1993 will be about 5800.000. Rancho Cuca monga's share of the costs for Fiscal Year 1992 - 1993 is 558,500 (based upon the allocation method outlined in Appendix A of the Agreernent). The proposed Fiscal Year 1992 - 1993 Engineering Di�dsion budget contains an appropriation request of $70,000. The appropriation includes the City's share of the allocated COsls and fends to begin the City's mandated monitoring and anfbrcement efforts. The Agreement, allocates costs based upon the actual land uses in carinjnri�dletlon. Land uea was chosen as the cost allocation factor since each land use contributes a definable level of storm water run- off. 'file basis of Inch jurisdiction's cost N their potential to discharge contaminated storm wader into (lie flood control systcm. 1'�'Ir The Agreement was drafted by an NPDES Funding /Finance Sub- committee comprised of staff from the Cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario. and Rancho Cucamonga. Staff from the County Transportation /Flood Control Department also participated. Earlier drafts of the Agreement were reviewed by the co- permittees. Many of their comments on the draft were incorporated into the final Agreement. Those comments that were not incorporated into the final Agreement were acknowledged by the County Transportation /Flood Control Department. A copy of the acknowledgement is attached. It should be noted that the Agreement must be submitted to the Santa Ana Region Water Quality Control Board by May 8, 1992. Any co- permitees that, have not adopted the Agreement prior to May 8, 1992 are subject to the levy of penalties by the water Quality Control Board. Respectfully submitted, 6J William J. O'Neil City En- ainccr WJO:smd Attachments RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICC Special Workshop May 6, 1992 (Starting at conclusion of Council meeting) Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Call: Buquet —. Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright _. INTRODUCTION OF PROPOSED PRELDAINARY BUDGET FOR 1992/93 FISCAL YEAR. 1, Debra J. Adams, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May S, 1992, per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.