HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/06/03 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
June 3, 1992
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
City Councibnemhers
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
William J. Alexander, Councilmember
Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember
Diane Williams, Councilmember
Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember
s�+
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 989 -1851
City Council Agenda
PAGE
Suns 3, 1992
��(
L—ul,-u
i
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda seat be in
writing. The deadline for submitting these items is Se00 p.m.
on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's
Office receives all such items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Boll Call: Buquet , Alexander , Stout ,
Williams , and Wright
E. ANNOUNCER -TUTS /PRESENTATIONS
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM T'BE PUBLIC
This is the ties and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for
a subsegueut meeting. Comments am to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
2s CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the
Council at one time without discussion. Any it" may be
removed by a councilmember or member of the audience for
discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: May 6, 1992
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 5/13/92, 5/20/92 and
5/21/92; and Payroll ending 5/7/92 for the total amount
of $1,838,810.51.
3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off -Sale Beer S Wine
10
far Smart & Final, Smart S Final Stores Corporation,
8675 Base Line Road.
4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General for
12
Smith's Food 6 Drug Center 0702, Smith'. Food 6 Drug
Centers, Incorporated, northwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue.
5. Approval of Appointments to 'che Bilingual, Senior and
lq
Sports Advisory Committees.
_ City Council Agenda
PAGE
June 3, 1992
2
6.
Approval of the incremental transfer of $66,149.00 from
19
the 1990/91 phase of the multi -year Community
Development Block Grant funded Southwest Cucamonga
Street Improvement Project to various prcgram year
phases of this project.
7.
Approval to get annual special tax for Community
22
Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System
in the amount of $297.48 per acre).
23
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -167
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY
CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
31
8.
Approval to set annual special tax for Community
Facilities District No. 68 -2 (Drainage and Law
Enforcement).
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -168
33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2
(DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT)
9.
Approval of Environmental Assessment and Tentative
40
Parcel Map 13987 - Lewis Development Company - Approval
of a resolution confirming the decision from the City
Council hearing of May 20, 1992 to modify and approve
the Conditions of Approval relating to Tentative Parcel
Map 13987.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -169
41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
MODIFYING AND APPROVING THE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 TO
CREATE A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE TERRA
VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AM
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APNe 227- 151 -17
_ City Council Agenda
PAGE
June 3, 1992
3
10.
Approval to execute Memorandum of Understanding (CO 92-
48
038) between the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs
Task Force and its Fiscal Agent, San Bernardino County
Superintendent of Schools, and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
11.
Approval to execute a Subordination Agreement from Shih-
52
Chen Hsu for the property located at 10010 Almond Street
(APN 1074- 041 -06).
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -170
53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM
SHIN -CHEN HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME (APN 1074 - 041 -06)
12.
Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement,
55
Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract No. 14644,
located a the and of Camellia Court, north of Hillside
Road, east of Beryl Street, submitted by Jorge R.
Garcia, DRA Garcia & Associates.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -171
57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14644,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -172
59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 14644
13.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
62
5782 Haven Avenue, located on the west side of Haven
Avenue eouth of Hillside Road, submitted by The Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Sainte.
- City Council Agenda
PAGE
June 3, 1992
4
RESOLUTION NO. 92-173
64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 5782 HAVEN
AVENUE
14. Approval of Reduction and Substitution of Securities for
65
Tract 13359, located on the east side of Sapphire Street
between Orchard Street and ,Iennet Street, submitted by
H.E. Heim Incorporated /Royal Conserve Corporate.
Release: Contingent upon acceptance of Certificate
of Deposit in the amount of $190,000.00
to be transferred to the City by Surety
Company
Faithful Performance Bond $166,200.00
Labor and Materials Bond $ 83,100.00
Accept:
Reduced Faithful Performance
Certificate of Deposit $106,900.00
Labor and Materials
Certificate of Deposit $ 83,100.00
15. Approval to accept Improvements and Notice of Completion
67
for the Utility Undergrounding associated with Tract
128350 located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue north
of Arrow Highway.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -174
60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT
12835 - UNDERGROUNDING AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORE
16. Approval to accept Improvemuite, Release of Honda and
69
Notice of Completion for Tract 13304 - Base Line Road
Improvements, located on the south side of Base Line
Road between Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive.
_ City Council Agenda
PAGE
.Tune 3, 1992
5
Releaee:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000.00
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 32,600.00
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 17570
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT
13304 - BASE LINE ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORE
17. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and
71
Notice of Completion for CUP 90 -40 located on the
south"at corner of Jasper Street and Sierra Vista
Street.
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 32,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -176
72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP
90 -40 AND AUTROLIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE
Is. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and
73
Notice of Completion for CUP 91 -11, located on the east
aide of Lucas Ranch Road north of 4th Street.
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 4,360.00
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -177
74
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR COP
91 -11 AND AUTHORIZI= THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION PC% THE WORK
_ City Council Agenda
PAGE
June 3, 1992
6
19. Approval to set a Public Hearing for July 1, 1992 -
75
Approval of Amended Parcel Map 11891, located generally
at: the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Jersey
Boulevard, submitted by RCDC Associated L.P., A
California Limited Partnership.
76
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMENDED
PARCEL MAP 11891 AND OFFERING A TIME AND
PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
E. CO elm ORDINANCES
The following Ordinancer. have had public hearings at the time
of first reading. Second rulings are expected to be routine
and von - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council
at one tiae without discussion. The City Clerk will Mad the
title. Any item can be removed for discussion.
1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL
AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02 - JACA MASI
ORDINANCE NO. 696 (second reading)
78
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 92 -02, PARTS A S B ELIMINATING
DESIGNATED ACCESS POINTS ALONG ROCHESTER
AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW
ROUTE, AND ADDING AN "AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE
COURT" USE CONSISTING OF AUTOMOTIVE
SERVICES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES AS A
CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA
7, AND "SPECIALTY BUILDING SUPPLIES AND
ROME IMPROVEMENTS" AS A CONDITIONALLY
PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA 7,
RESPECTIVELY - "Ni 229- 011 -10, 19, 21,
26, 27 AND 20
2. CONSIDERATION Or AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO
DECLARE A D00 AS VICIOUS
PAGE
- City Council Agenda
June 3, 1992
,
ORDINANCE NO. 498 (second reading)
84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 6.04 TO THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL DUDE PERTAINING TO
POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND /OR VICIOUS DOGS
3. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. 307 -B (second reading)
92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 2.2B OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION TO
REFLECT THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE FIVE, TERMS
OF TWO AND FOUR YEAR APPOINTMENTS, AND THE
REMOVAL OF JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS WITH
THE CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and /or posted as
public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the
meeting to receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ETIWANDA SRrVjEjC PLAN
94
AMENDMENT 89 -03 - U.S. HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of
the Planning Commission's decision recommending denial
of a request to amend certain development standards
within the Btiwanda Specific Plan. (Continued frost
April 1, 1992)
CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211
94
- O.S. HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision denying the proposed tentative
tract map and design review for the development of 226
single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the
Etiwanda Specific Plan in the Low - Medium Residential
District (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre), located on the
east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of the Devore
Freeway, and west of East Avenue - APN, 1100- 041 -09,
1100 - 081 -02, 1100- 171 -01 and 13, 1100- 181 -01, 1100 -141-
01 and 12, and 1100- 191 -01. Related Filet Etiwanda
Specific Plan Amendment 89 -03. (Continued frost April 1,
1992)
PAGE
0 city Council Agenda
June 3, 1992
8
2. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
97
APPLICATION POE PROGRAM YEAR 1992/93 AND AMENDMENT TO
TEE 1989/90 AND 1990/91 FINAL STATEMENTS FOR
REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS - The adoption of the Final
Statement of Camunity Development Objectives for
Program Year 1992/93 and the final selection of projects
based an a grant of $551,000.00 and $13,260.00 in
program income, and related amendments to the 1989/90
and 1990/91 Final Statements to allow reprogramming of
funds.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -179
132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF
FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEW BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1992/93
3. CON- T- ==. -Q4 OF APPEAL OF HODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL
134
USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - Appeal of the Planning
Co®ission'• denial of a request to expand the hours of
operation on Friday" for an existing 103,552 square foot
indoor wholesale /retail commercial use located within
the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street -
APNt 229- 262 -20.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -180
174
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DENYING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 91 -03, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE
HOURS OF OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN
THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND HARING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN, 229-
262-28
Q. PUBLIC REMINDS
The following itos have no legal Publication or posting
requiraownts. The Chair will open the rating to receive
public testiaoaF.
No Items Submitted.
PAGE
- City Council Agenda
June 3, 1992
9
E. CITY NARAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public
leati=my, although the Chair may open the maating for public
input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF NATTERS FOR THE NOVEMBER 3 1992
177
ELECTION
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -181
178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY
ON TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 1992,
FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE
CITY AS RRQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GRNERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID
ELECTION WITH STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO
RENEW ON SAID DATE
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -182
179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR
ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS
SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE CO STS
OP THE CANDIDATE'S STATEMENT FOR THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN
THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -183
181
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF
A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE NELn IN
THE CITY ON TUESDAY, THE THIRD (3RD) DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 1992, SUBMITTING A QUESTION TO
THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING WHETHER
THE MAYOR SHALL SERVE A POUR YEAR TERM
PAGE
city CStY CO Agenda
June
June 3, 1992
30
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -186
183
(OPTIONAL)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE
• WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -185
184
(OPTIONAL)
• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -186
185
(OPTIONAL)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
PROVIDING FOR THE PILING OF REBUTTAL
ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following item have base requested by the City Council
for discussion. They are not. public hearing itens, although
the Chair my open the Heating for public input.
1. DISCUSSION OF LIBRARY MASTER PLAN (Continued free May
186
6, 1991)
2. CONSIDERATION TO FILL VACANCY ON THE HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION (ORAL REPORT)
J. IRMIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR MIT MBSETIMO
This is the ties for City Council to identify the item they
wish to discuss at the next "sting. Thee item will act be
discussed at this sating, only identified for the next
mating.
- City Council Agenda
PAGE
June 3, 1992
11
X. CONMONICATIONS PROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included oa the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimeny a d set the utter for
a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURBI®YT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE 8E801ON TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL
NATTERS, PROPERTY NEdOTIATIONE, AND PENDING LITIGATION WITH
ROODS V. CITY OP RANCHO COGMONGA; AND BEIROSIAN V. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO BUDGET WORKSHOP TO BE RELD ON
DUNS 4, 1992 AT 6,00 P.N. IE THE TRI- COISBNXTIEB OONPERE(CS
ROOM OP THE CIVIC CENTER
I, Deora J. Mama, City Clark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on May 29, 1992, seventy -twn (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
May 6, 1992
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TO OADmt
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was hold on Wednesday, May
6, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at
7:11 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane
Williams (arrived 7:20 p.m.), Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda
D. Danisls, Deputy City Manger; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Tarry
Smith, Park Planning /Development Superintendent] Otto Eroutil, Deputy City
Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II; Jim
Hart, Administrative Services Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City
Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst
I; Capt. Bruce Zeiner and Lt. Mike Ingram, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department;
and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
. R R • R
El. Presentation of Proclamation to Rachel Bolduc for her quick action in
saving her co- worker.
Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Rachel Bolduc.
82. Introduction of Rancho Cucamonga Pulice Department'a Bicycle Enforcement
Team.
Capt. Zeiner, Police Department, introduced the bicycle enforcement team. He
also invited the community to the press conference to be held Friday, May 8,
10:00 a.m. in front of City Hall.
Councilmember Williams arrived at 7:20 p.m.
•RR RRR
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 2
B3. Presentation to the City Council for Awards Received from the American
Economic Development Council for Marketing and Promotions Excellence.
Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, presented the awards received by the City to
the City Council.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FRON TBE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
• f R ♦ f R
Dl. Approval of Minutes: April 1, 1992 (Wright absent)
April 15, 1992 (Wright absent)
April 22, 1992 (Buquet, Wright absent)
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/15/92, 4/22/92, and 4/29192; and
Payroll ending 4/9/92 for the total amount of $1,298,938.34.
D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer 6 Wine Eating Place for
China Garden Restaurant, Ri Yin Zhao, 9770 19th Street.
D4. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for the
1992 Tree Planting Program, to be funded from SBA Grant, Account No. 124 -4637-
6028.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D5. Approval to extend Comcaet's Cable, T.V. Franchise.
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -012H
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH CONCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON
EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
D6. Approval to appropriate $160,683.26 from Deferred Revenue Fund (87- 13901-
7907) to the Redemption Fund (87- 4637 -7920) to call bonds within CFD 84 -1 (Day
Creek Drainage District).
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 3
D7. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 92 -031) between the City and Alta Loma
School District for use of Deer Canyon and Carnelian Elementary Schools for
summer Day Camp Programs. Agreement includes reimbursement of utility costa.
Da. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street
Improvements and Dedication of Rights -of -Nay at the southwest corner of Calaveraa
Avenue and Ninth Street between Julia Guttero and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -133
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALTPJRNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION
OF PUBLIC IMPRO' RMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA GUTTERO AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
D9. Approval to accept Lien Agreement as security for the completion of on -Site
grading activity for Conditional Use Permit 90 -37 (Foothill Marketplace) , located
on the South side of Foothill Boulevard between I -15 and Etiwanda Avenue,
submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT AS SECURITY
FOR THE COMPLETION OF ON -SITE GRADING ACTIVITY FROM FOOTHILL
MARKETPLACE PARTNERS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE
SAME
DID. Approval of Maps, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement
securities, Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Condition.
and Restrictions and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Tract Map Nos.
14407 and 14407 -1, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain
View Drive, submitted by Lewis Development Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14407 AND
14407 -1
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -136
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH LEWIS
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 14407
City Council minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -137
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NO. 14407
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NO
14407 -1
D11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12876,
located on the northeast corner of 'Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted
by Daly Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870
D12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13273 -
Pedestrian Undercroceing, located on Milliken Avenue south of Mountain View
Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes,
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -140
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13273 -
PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSINC
D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13898,
located on the northwest corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue, submitted by
Hixrahi and Say.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -141
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13898
D 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13930,
located on Nilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue, submitted
by Mix Development.
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
E %TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13930
D15. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for Tract 11341 Milliken Avenue Medians, located on Milliken Avenue between
Foothill Boulevard and Mountain View Drive.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 58,113.00
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -143
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE MILLIKEN AVENUE MEDIANS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE
D16. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for Tract 13565 - MWD Landscape, located on the southwest corner of Crescents Way
and Ridgeline Place.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $271,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 27,100.00
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13565 - MWD LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE
D17. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for MDR 88 -19, located on the south aide of Arrow Route between Red Oak street
and Vincent Avenue.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $150,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
MDR 88 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORE
D18. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bond, and Notice of Completion
for the Construction of Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit
Avenue.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $222,000.00
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 6
RESOLUTION No. 92 -146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE
AND SUMMIT AVENUE
D19. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for the Improvements located on the East Side of Haven Avenue between Church
Street and Base Line Road.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $144,500.00
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET
AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D20. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 11734, located
on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 18,240.00
Maintenance Guarantee Cash Bond $ 600.00
D21. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the Interior Tract
Streets in Tract 13304, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway
and Mountain View Drive.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond
$ 10,538.00
D22. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 9192, located
on the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $101,936.00
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Dr) $ 67,448.00
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Block Wall) $ 53,456.00
D23. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the Undergrounding of
Utilities for Parcel Map 11030, located on the east aide of Haven Avenue between
Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond
$ 61,660.00
D24. Approval of Preliminary Engineer'a Report and Setting a Public Hearing for
June 17, 1992 to levy the Annual Assessments and approve the Preliminary
Engineer's Report for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD -85).
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO, 92 -148
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (PD -85) AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARING THEREON
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -149
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PARR AND RECREATION
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85)
D25. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting a Public Hearing for
.Tune 17, 1992 to levy the Annual Assessments and Approve the Engineer's Reports
for Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and S.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -150
A RESOLUTION OF T'E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
1992/93 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -151
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
D26. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting a Public Hearing for
June 17, 1992, to levy the Annual Assessments and Approve the Engineer's Reports
for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
RESOLUTION NO. 92-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS.
1, 2, 3A, 35, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 8
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -153
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'$ ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0.
♦ R R ♦ R t
P. CGNBaNP ORDINANCES
E1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Development
Districts Map as described below:
1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium
Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas:
F. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow
Route and Archibald Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low
Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use
designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low -
Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01
through 03, 05 through 07 and 208 - 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 494.
ORDINANCE NO. 494 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA F, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO
LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE
AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 206- 291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13,
15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Ordinance No. 494.
Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -0 -1 (Wright abstained).
Councilmember Wright stated she was abstaining because she was not present for
the first reading.
f R R • • •
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 9
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items were submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NO items were submitted.
• x x « w x
B. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT, SANTA ANA REGION Staff report
presented by Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II.
Councilmember Wright asked Mr. Dellhime where the money would come from.
Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II, reported it would be from General Fund
monies, but that in the future staff hoped to get the money from other sources.
Councilmember Alexander inquired if Cucamonga County Water District was paying
for part of this.
Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II, reported they were not.
Councilmember Wright felt this was explained in a technical manner and felt the
staff report explained it in a manner that was easier to understand, and asked
that the staff report be read as part of the record.
Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II, read the staff report into the record
which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
Jack Lam, City Manager, added this is being placed on the City by a higher
government source, whereby no funding was provided to the City to comply with
this.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the agreement. Motion
carried unanimously, 5 -0.
I. COUNCIL HUSINES�
I1. DISCUSSION OP LIBRARY MASTER PLAN (Continued frosi April 1, 1992)
Councilmember Williams stated a letter was sent to the County per the discussion
from the April 1, 1992 Council meeting, and that as of this meeting, the City has
not received a letter bark from the County. she felt it was up to the Council
to decide what to do.
City Council Minutes
May 6, 1992
Page 10
Jack Lam, City Manager, mentioned he would talk with Harry Maya on Friday at a
Managers- meeting he would be attending to find out about the County's position
on this matter.
Mayor Stout explained about the Library tax the county collects and what it is
used for. He added Rancho Cucamonga wants its cervices enhanced.
ACTION: Update to came back to the Council at the June 3, 1992 meeting.
Councllmember Buquet felt operational information should be developed by the City
to see what it would actually cost to operate its own library.
• ♦ R R ♦ f
No items were identified for the next meeting.
f • • • a
No communications were made from the public.
R 1 A • • •
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to recess the City Council until
the conclusion of the Fire District meeting, at which time the Council would
reconvene and adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss pending litigation,
property acquisition and personnel matters. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0.
The Council recessed at 7:46 p.m.
The Ccuncil reconvened at 8:22 p.m.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn for the Executive
Session mentioned above. Notion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The meeting adjourned
at 8:23 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adama, CHC
City Clerk
Approved;
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCR PERICJ: 05 -13 -91 (91192)
.......................
RUN DATE:
05/13/91 POI, 1
VENDOR
.....
=. -......... ......................................
NAME
........... ........................................................................
A............ .... ............................
ITEM UFSCRIPTION WARR NO
.....................................
�.........
WARP. ANT.
1A CHECMA
OVERLAP
6635
CALIFORNIA DEPT. CF FORtiTRY INC
20% AOMIN FEE TREE GRANT PROJECT A
65138.
IT .913.01
<C< 65139 -
AS 546 »>
667
VISA
4810 0058 8140 9402 0
65541.
9I6.2 1
«( 65548 -
66330 »>
61
3ANR OF A"tRICG NATIONAL TRUST AND
EARLY PA1 -OFF CFO 84 -1 DAY CREEK
663310
160,683.26
<<< 66332 -
66155 »>
5703
SNOMDEN EL EL T IC, INC_
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 89499 A
66756
118.00-
«( 66757 -
66',96 »)
1826
PACTEL CELLULAR
43300131 CHUCK 8VOUET
66197.
B6.11
P44
GREAT WESTERN SAVIN2S
EMP. PC. DEFERRED COMP /PPE 5/3/92
66198.
6.139.00
6194
DR. JANET BALER
PURCHASE OF LARK DRIVE
66799.
62,100.00
A7)4
DR. JANET BALER
TAIES.CFD.PROF SERV A
66800.
2.143.15
6794
OR. JANET BALER
PURCHASE OF LARK DRIVE
66801.
62. 100.0C
6794
DR. JANET PALER
PURCHASE OF LARK DRIVE
66802.
2.743.25
(<( 66803 -
66804 >>>
385
ACTION SUPPLY INC.
CLASS III BARRICADES LEFT C RIGHT 1
66805
1.680.91
6792
ADVANCE[ SYSTEMS TECHNDLO`.IES
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 411004
66806
90.06
6779
ALLSTATE FLMCING
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 23672
66807
159_CO
2929
AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION
7 HABITS OF HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
6680tl
9.95
2.93
AMTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CD.
SERVICE FOP THE MONTH OF MAY
66809
315.00
6193
ARM MANAGEMENT SERVICES
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. X20864
66810
10.00
BORE
ASP, KATMRTh
REFUND CLASS 46032 RCT 897302
66811
35.00
.�� 6191
ASP, MISS,
REFUND CLASS 46D48 PIT @97314
66812
18.00
383
AUSTIN -FCUST ASSOCIATES, INC
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 114395
66813
6.64
2616
AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0
66814
153.28
2551
6 L 0 SPECIALTIES. INC.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 88698
66815
65_43
841
BANK OF AAtR1CA- CORPORATE
SVCS RENDERED AS TRUSTEE 10 /1 -3129
66816
1.064.77
6787
BARNES. CWCH
REFUND IMA7 TRIP PCT 09494
66817
36.00
379
BARRY TREE `.ARE
ARBORISTS REPORT TENTATIVE TR14190
66818
1.320.00
33
BASELINE TRUE VALCc HARDWARE
8ONGEE /MIRE ROPE CLIP /ROPE 4
66819
14.55
3217
9AYLESS STATIONERS
OFFICE SUPPLIES - 4
66920
83.84
I338
BIG A ALTO PARTS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 4150 A
66921
31.63
34
BOARDROOM REPOR43
I YEAR SU3SCRIPTION - JACK LAM
66822
29.95
I'S
%AAOFORC. HARpIO
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CLASS 15.41
6.9Z3
69.30
1156
BRITTON INC.. BDB
MONTE VISTA STREET IMPROVEMENT PRJ.
66824
4.289.85
6782
%RUGGER'S CERTIFIED WELDING. WAGE
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 021744
66825
27_02
937
CALCUMP INC.
MAINTENANCE FROM 5/1191- 5/31/92
66826
282.00
594
CALIFORNIA CASUALS
T- SHIRTS FOR TEEN SPORT CHALLENGE
66027
11163.70
6788
CARR01 LAURA
REFUND IMAK TRIP PIT 08414
66928
18.00
496
CHEVRON U 5 A, INC
GASOLINE CHARGES
66%29
27.15
1546
COAST ELECTRIC
LIGHTING SUPPLIES
66930
189.55
681
COMMUNICATION TECMNIOUeS
CRIDER FAST RECHARGE BATTERY
66031
159.64
6183
CONSUMER REPORTS
SUBSCRIPTION
66431
28.00
3269
CRUSH MASTER ASPHALT
CONCRETE C ASPHALT LOADS 0
66833
120.00
85
CUCAMONGA CO WATER GIST
44 CU FT
66834
108.40
239
0 E A CONCRETE CO
MAIN L BIKER. R.C. A
66935
695.53
284
DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO. INC
COURIER 12 COME PW
66836
37.17
1291
DATAV4ULT
DATA STORAGE
66837
104.50
6789
DE LEON, DEDNICIA
REFUND IM4% TRIP PIT 19475
66938
36.00
107
OETCO
NAME YADGF. L BADGE REPAIR
66831
28.02
274
DIETZ TOWING
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 1641
66840
70.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF uARRANTS
rCR PERIOD! J5 -13 -92 (91/92)
RON DATE:
05/13/91 PAGE: L
.......................>._.
'f`_Y:L`R
...........................
aa......... a...........
NINE
..........................
a....................... •..............................
ITEM IESCRIPTI011 PARR NO
vv.... uu.... uuv ........................
a....... a. a............ a..
NARR. AMT.
...............................
** CHECK/
OVERLAP
Stdi
3AV
1 LOT _ICYCLE RENEWAL
66841
16.00
6165
DOVER cLEVATCR i,MPANY
OVE]P6YMENY OF BUS. LTC. 615402
66842
40.50
1301
ORAPHIA
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
66$43
94.63
523
1ISTMAN. INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES A
ObdH
255.30
6786
EASTWOOD 44RCE43 APARTMENTS
OVE RP6INENT OF BUS. LTC. 110912
66845
5.60
6390
EDWARDS, MICFAEL
PARTIAL REFUND NEIGHBORED CTR APRIL
66946
ITS. 30
459
EGGEE AO SOFTWARE
CCMPUSERVS MACTNTOSM 1
66847
169.15
1258
EELLIS, JANA
REIM5UFSEM£N1 FOR C.E.R.T. CL03
66849
4.26
1258
ELLIS, JANA
REFRESHMENT C.E.R.T. CL $5 5119/92
66849
45.00
llb
EXPIRE CO.
FIREMARS FUND INS. 4MXIR0248532
66850
12.022.00
.791
EVERS. BETTY
REFUND UIMAY TRIP ACT 18410
66851
I5.D0
.900
FINISHING TOUCH, THE
REFRESHMENTS FOR DESIGN AWARD FROG
66852
362.42
1844
FONTANA MOTORCYCLES INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0
66853
39.61
2840
FORD OF L"LANO, INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE A
66054
219.47
1082
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
MONTHLY TIES JUL 92
66955
1.70
1444
GARCIA, AMY
SCOREKEEPER 18 GAMES PPE 5/3/92
66856
121.50
4829
BARMAN, JEANINE
REFUND CLASS 16093 ACT 096ZB3
66857
12.00
139
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES
DISPOSABLE OUST Bt ASTER II
66858
LT.S3
4654
�XIFFIN HOMES PARTNERSHIP
GVERPAIMENT OF BUS. LIC. 116519
66659
I.SZO_17
4890
GRUBB C ELLIS CZAPANY
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. 89127
66860
90.DO
137
GTE CALIFORNIA
9.8 -1550 1
66861
11162.79
4883
HALE COMPANY, THE
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. 921630
66Ab2
23.00
4897
HANDLER. LILIAM
REFUND IMAA TRIP RCT 08479
66863
18
500
NAVSD7. •SSGCIAIE S. INC.
LANDSCAif STRUCTURES BIKE RACK
66864
:00
460.00
2155
HAVEN WIRE L LIQUOR CO.
CATEQ"G
66865
35.80
ZS19
NECKETT SLAG PRU'CUCTS
314+ CLASS 740 BASE
66866
309.9T
4835
MENNEGIN. RUTH
REFUND IMAA TRIP RCT 06412
66967
18.00
1069
HEYDE, CONALC L-
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CL*6303
66869
73.92
4099
HICKMAN. PAITY
REFUND RID WRESTLING RCT 0007
66069
30.OD
49D2
HI661N5, RICOARG
801 REFUND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
66810
528.00
L61
NOTT LUMbER LO_. S.H.
MOUSE CLUE TRAP
66071
10.72
495
HYDRO-SCAPE PRJDUCTS, INC
TERMINAL .TRIP 1
66872
131.46
A6
INDUSTAIIL ASPHALT
HELLRIR AVE.. RANCMO CUCAMOMGA 0
66873
215.16
4903
INLAND JPRiGE MANAGERS' ASSOCIATION
ASSOCIATION DUES FOR 1992
66474
15.00
907
INLAND MEOIATION bO RD
LANDLORD /TENANT - APRIL 1992
66b75
524.29
908
INLAND MEDIJTION BOARD
FAIR HCUSIIIG - APRIL 1992
66876
742.02
9Z
IbLANO VILIEY DAIL1 ."LLETIR
SUB /B REEKS 6/7- 7/20/92 OSASTR PREP
66877
15.12
2317
INMAC
BUDGET FLOPPY 901
66878
123.17
4686
INTERSTATE IRTERIOR SYSTEMS. iNC.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS- LTC. *13606
66879
132.60
4891
JOHNSON. MICR4L
REFUND CLASS *6183 RCT *95789
66%80
25.00
4089
KALPINS L.M.L.. RUTH I.
OVERPAYMENT OF 805. LTC. 012207
6A86I
16.90
3417
KELLY SERVICES, INC.
40 MRS W/E 5/3/92 HELEN CANZONERI
66881
317.20
A69Z
RIbUR15. MATTHEW
REFUND CLASS 15321 RCT 097739
66883
40.00
1218
KNOB
COWHIDE GLOVES - BRASS SHIM 1
66884
314.29
SIB
"EN. MIRY
MJNTMLT ORAJING -APRIL 92 RIOESHARE
6.395
20.00
1075
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
METERS AND CALIBRATION AITS
66885
240.59
40BT
LARRY GEORGE EIECT91C .RC.
GVERPAIMENT OF BUS. LTC. 417319
66887
10.00
179
LEWIS HCME1
REFUND DEPOSIT - PERMIT A 3138
66888
11000.00
4016
LEWIS HOMES
TR 11134 MAINT eUARINTE, REFUND
66883
600.00
4886
LUNDE.V UNCSCAiF INC.
OVERPAYMENT OF IDS. LTC. 12540
66990
25.00
1112
MIILSORT, INC_
WEER ENUING 473-0/91
66491
49.46
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCP PERIOD: 05 -13 -92 (91/92)
......... w w v w w......•..... a.. a .. ..............................• a.. w.. v.• w..••. w....•. ..
v EHODR NAME ITEM Jfl,RIPTION WARR NO
.................. a........ a.. a....= a................ a. a... ...............................
549
72
16
.901
3.15
4396
3336
4893
4584
2591
4998
b15
2:.8
3637
46 %5
3340
2212
1826
5711
5112
5128
1079
1719
2682
826
2994
28L7
65
1219
5346
5713
2213
3364
70
TO
5730
626
545
112
276
5714
315
301
2:.
32
3443
5716
2778
05
7705
5117
5 11
MARIPOSA NCk1ICLLTU6AL E4T.INC.
.'RA CHRIS, INC.
M 4RANAN.A4C$}NaRIrXA ryS pN.L FINu
RC CALL, SUSAN
Mi CALL. SISAN
RE O. AIf CE
YCRIT ERG. CC.
MILLARET• JERRY
MILLER. BS i TY ANN
MINNESOTA NE STERN
.
MI NITL. ARE
SI DI
N 6 S /LCVRT
KARL AUTO UNIFORM MLA. NAL UNIFORM CO., R INC.
01 AH ElUIPPENT . INC.
P L O TECHNOLOGIES
PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPPLY
PA CELLULAR
PADILL Ir JLN!,
PAUL. MICHAEL
PDR
PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA
PONCMLUCB RHONE
PRIML GE BY PM ONE
PRIME SOURCE. r INC.
PRINT SOURCE. THE
PR UE I L JS
PRUDENTIAL C SEkAL S
UPRLT
POLICE AND ASSOLIA TES
POLICE,
IROLG RANDY
OU IP JLNURSE ESTnER
4 6 0 NURSERY
R G HONCUCAMONGA
RANCHO CUCAPONGA CMAI9ER
RANCHO CUCAMJNGA CHAMBER
EtUIPW
RANCND LUIP ENT LEASING CO.
REUL "S AND RHEELS
RED WING G 11 DE STORE
RITZ CLHERP CENTERS
RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
. OM MEAN AMiGAL 1L CONSTRUCTION LM
SALAS OCLCAES
SAN BERN CG SXEFIFFS
SAN BERN LG SOLID WASTE HUMERI
SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC
SCAG(SOUTHf RN CALIF ASSGC OF GOYRYM
SRE Mr ANNELfEY`
SEEA A TREE .EkT
SEAL FURNITURE L SYSTE4S INC.
Sf FENCE COMPANY
AHI
SHANKS, ARKS. Bc tT1
90 CNECAY
APOIL 1992
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT 1316
BEDROSIAN vs. R.C. FILE 6754ZK5 A
REFUND CLASS 96330 RCT 697088
I.STRUCTOR PMT CLASS A 6088
REFUND IMAM TRIP ACT 49476
GAS EXFAUST SYSTEM MODIFICATION
TRANSFER FROM CLO5321 TO CLA5306
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
EXPRESS MULTI -PURP BLACK /CLEAR 4 -FXA
REFUND IRAY TRIP ACT 18487
COMMUNITY FACILITIES UIST A 88 -2
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -UNIT 9 642 -643
MAINTENANCE A
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 111336
CONSULTANT SERVICES
RISC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 4
6[111340133
REFUND -IMAM TRIP ACT 8431
REFUND CLASS 15321, RCT #37792
1932 PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE
SLIDES. DEVELOPING L PROCESSING A
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CLASS #6355
RESET METFR 6704057
MAINZ 04150 CPU I EA ISTING TAPE SUB
BUS CA005 -REG CUSTOMER STK,PM3253
96.S MEMBERSHIP DUES -J BARNES
SMIRTSLPANTS -OTEN, IDAME,YNIGUEZ A
RETENTION BILLING AERIALEMIPPING SV
REFUND - IMAX TRIP ACJT #8481
REFUND CLISS45442, RCT 195866
CRAPE FYRTLC, 1 15 GAL
PROGRESS PMC SIERRA NATURE
MAY PAYMENT
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 6/1/92
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC #16511 4
SERVICE. TIRE REPAIR 0641,IODL,ERR A
WORK BDOTS- ROMANDIA.STUOLET,DANIELS
2CR5 F /CANON- MINOLTA CAKERALFILY
REPRO FILM L PEN SET 4
UYERPATMENT OF BUS LTC 116660
REPORT) -IMAX TRIP ACT 98475
MAY PRYMEVT A
A/C 1864, SOLID WASTE
2 SETS MODEL TOO GUTTER BROOMS
SCAG NEM8ERSHIP DUES 199E -93
REFUND-IMAX TRIP RET0844D
36IM ULMUS SEHP /
MISC TCULS FOR ASSEMBLY OF 9000 PNL
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC #20513
RdFUNO -IMAX TRIP RCT48424
RUN DATE: 115/13/92 'il.E: t
........................................
W4NP._ GMT.
........................................
OVERLAP
66992
2r24U.39
66693
5.A6
668"
6.928.84
66fl95
25.00
66896
14.00
66893
18.00
66B98
4.183.92
66099
25.00
66900
.25.00
66901
149_50
66902
36.OG
66903
1r1T4.T2
66904
40.21
66905
383.2S
66906
63.40
66901
4,229.46
66908
377.29
66909
35.16
66910
36.00
66911
40.00
66912
59.21
66913
66.11
66914
23.76
66915
4,000.00
66916
3x009.02
66917
40.00
66918
IZS.00
66919
72.61
66920
41.700.00
66921
18.00
6692Z
18.00
66923
29.63
66924
61.833.06
66925
11000.00
66926
100.00
66927
346.19
65929
131.00
Y4929
A48.11
66930
2 %.$D
66931
451.98
66932
45.00
66933
19.00
6693.
511,036.49
66935
3.603.79
66936
133.61
66937
5,836.DO
66939
18.00
66939
344.81
66940
63.03
66941
9.00
66942
18.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCN PERIOD: 05 -13 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE:
05/13/92 PA6c: A
.... a. s s.. s. s s...
•Y.. ........
a .............e...........a.a
S.... a a.. aaaasa. ..a.s sari . +....
a s a.... s. s.....
.... s....
.... NFSLP IPTIO APR . ......•• s...........•• N .. N
s... s.. s.... s...... s........ .................II............
s s...
• .. ANT .
M A R
I. s........................
.. CHECKA
OVERLAP
351
SLLM SHIP. 1HC
TENNIS SIGNS• 10 MIL LAM MIA ETELTS
66943
1T.T8
692
SIR SPEEGT
RUBBER $T4MP- 6ICYCLE ENFORC TEAM
66944
4.54
1327
SMART C FINAL
SUPPLIES FOR TEEN SPORT CHALLENGE /
66945
470.29
1701
SMORDEN KLELIRIC. INC.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LTC 412159
66946
112.OU
3278
50 CALIF ECI SOH
53 30 104 0005 OI 000 5 4
6694T
1.047.14
<<< 66948 -
66950 >>>
1432
SO CALIF cCISON- -ATTN: SHEILA LUNA
54 30 114 0007 01 000 9 0
66951
4.109.x8
59T
SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS
DISK PACK FOR NINE 2200
66952
123.91
322
SPARKLETTS
AC/Ml 425 000 3680/051001
66953
34.20
5719
STOP N 60 MARKET 4674
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LTC 410450
66956
16.93
5TZO
SWIFT, YCLETTA
REFUND -IMAA TRIP RCT46423
66955
36.00
5721
T.M.C. L. INC.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIST 415T06
66956
23.40
5722
TARBELL. ANGELA
PLAYSCFOOL INSTRUCTOR /AID
66957
is .Oa
5723
TAULMAN. OJNALU
REFUND -IMAK TRIP RCT 19491
66958
I8 -00
5o04
TAYLOR. PAUL
TUITION REIMB 6 BOOKS
66959
73.33
1151
T2CMNIC
MAINT FR14TER 81000 5/X439306
66960
245.00
2730
TELECOMMUNICATIONS M6WT. CORP.
TRANSFER OF CIA FRANCHISE /CABLE TV
66461
750.00
781
THOMAS. ANN
REFUND C145S 45321. ACT 498328
66962
40.00
318T
THRDCKMLRTCN, MIRLELA
INSTRUCTOR PMT CLASS 86042
66963
72.00
<<< 66964 -
66964 >>>
341
T944S -NEST FORD TRUCK
KIT MOCULA 1630 1
66965
501.40
5706
TURRET PUNCH CO. INC
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 48498
66966
6.00
t- 677
UNIVERSITY COPY SYSTEMS
SERVICE CONTRACT, SURCHARGE(BLACK)
66961
180_00
�- .89
UPLAND. CITY OF
111 N GROVE AVE. Ff14092610
66968
172.10
478
WARREN G CU., CARL
FILE 413222• PIPER 4
66969
2121004
113
NAME, KLE6N -LI4E CORP
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES.0331433700 A
66970
871.59
1522
WE TIP
1992 NE TIP CITY MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
669TL
51250.00
5725
WEAVER• THEDA
REFUND - IMAY TRIP ACT 88477
669T?
10.00
5726
WENNER CCN5TAUCTCON. JAMES
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LTC ILS019
66973
149.99
267
WESTERN ROCK CO
CLASS II BASE MATERIAL •
66974
663.74
5727
NEEREHOLSE 0326, THE
6VERPA(MENT OF BUS LIC 414537
66975
22.99
345
WHITNEY MACHINERY
HYO L TRANS FILTER 4
66976
142.77
2901
WOLFE. CUANE L-
INSTRUCTOR C- E.R.T. CLASS 03 515192
66917
62.50
509
XEROX CURPGR<TION
COPIER 1012Rc A/U974944183 1
66978
3.590.66
371
LEE WEUICAL SERVICE
VARIDUS CST 010 SUPPLIES
66979
272.23
348
ZEP MANLFALTL+ -IMG COM6ANY
1 OL ZIP 50
66980
49.36
A. TOTAL
L049 .650.14
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGN
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCR PERIUU: 05 -20-92 (91/92)
RUN DATE: 05/21/92 PAGE: I
.uu• .............................._............................................................... ...........................a...
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WANR. ANT.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............•................................................................... ..........•.•....................•
5382 WESTERN TEYPCRARY SFRVICIS
ZT31 'JNIGLOSE RE4ENCY TRAVEL
6803 CPF CONVERENCE
3364 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS
667 VISA
56T VISA
5730 RANCHO EQUIPMENT LEASING CO.
781 THDMAS, ANN
2013 CAREER TRACK
6795 ACCURATE TECHNOLOGIES
2687 ACURA JR. OSCAR
3389 KGARD, RCDNEY
6798 ALBINO. ANT" NY
3134 AKAN BROS., INC.
2906 AMERICAN THERMOPLASTIC COMPANY
24 ARBOR .NLRSERY INC.
310 ARROW TRUCK 3U DIES L EQUIP INC
26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS
1888 BACA, CATHERINE
3419 BALL INC'JSTRIES
2516 BARKER. JEFF
3455 BARRY, MELISSA
3227 BAYLESS STATIONERS
2517 BERRY. %INCA
1338 BIG A AUTO PARTS
1247 BLAKE PAPER CO.. INC.
3330 BORAL RESOURCES, INC.
6271 BOTTOM LINE
969 SOTO LUMBER
142 BRADFORD, HANGLO
1256 BRITTON INC.. 608
6197 BROWN, FRED
3193 BRUNICK. ALVAR.El L BATTERSBY
6601 BRUNO, SCNII
3451 BUSINESS MACHINE SECURITY
56 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
6398 CHAMBER OF CCMMERCE
73 CITRUS MOTCRS ONTARIO, INC.
14 CITY RENTALS
2546 COAST ELECIRIC
130 CONFUTER SERVICE CO
6802 CONTINENTAL PLUMBING. INC.
** CHECRO
OVERLAP
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 02063
62226.
18..24-
((( 62227 -
64649 »)
CITY CCNF.- FRESNO 4/29- 5 /:. /91-AOAMS
64650*
200.00
((< 64651 -
64880 >>I
92 CA PRESERVATION CONE RF.GISIVATON
64881*
765.00
<<< 64882 -
65522 »)
FERTILIZER
65523*
109.90
CC< 65524 -
65546 JJ>
4820 0058 8140 9402 0
65547*
916.23 -
<<. 65548 -
66546 »J
4820 005A 8144 1009 0
66X7*
916.23
U.. 66548 -
66926 Y))
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 016611 0
66927
34B.19-
<<+. 66928 -
66961 »)
REFUND CLASS 15321. RCT 098329
66962
40.00 -
<U 66963 -
6698D >11
SEMINAR LINDA. ARAGON 5/20192
66981*
49.00
«< 66982 -
66983 >>>
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. Pt$975
66984
38.40
ADULT 8.0. SCOREKEEPER PPE 5117
66985
63.25
MENS BASKETBALL OFFICIAL PPE 5117
66S86
45.00
CLASS •A• LICENSE
66961
27.00
SOLID RUBBLE DUMPS 0
66980
100.00
I• (3 -PING) VINYL BINOFR /TABS
66989
5T5.93
VARIOUS PLANTS 0
66990
215.42
T- HANDLE ASSY
46991
7.27
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN TURD 4/30
66992
3DO.00
PLAYSCHOOL INSTR AID. 15 HOURS
66993
165.3D
RESCUE GRAFITTI REMOVER
66994
190.83
A- SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 3U GAMES P
66995
324.00
EGG HUNT REC. ASST. 5.5 NOS. 4139
66996
30.25
C.M. SLLESDRD 11448117 0
66997
1.011.93
PLAYSCh00L INSTR 36 MRS. PPE 5111
66998
188.28
ENGINE STAND 0
66999
1.042.93
SUPPLIES I
57000
98.21
STATE 3/8• MAXIMUM
6T001
142.59
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL I YEAR
67002
29.95
3/4• COX PLYWOOD
67003
17.93
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CL09442
67004
35.64
HAVEN IMPROVEMENT AT AT L SF RR
67005
IT.550.00
REFUND CLASS 06311 RCT 198635
67006
35.00
BOUKIMG FEES
67007
109.95
REFUND CLASS 4302 RCT 01422
67008
26.00
CYLINDER LOCKS 6 KEYS
61009
18.32
STREET SIGNS 0
67010
1.294.20
MONTHLY LUNCHEON
67011
50.00
VEHICLE .MAINTENANCE UNIT IT14 A
67012
1.345.77
L.P.G. FUEL
67013
49.78
LIGHIIYG SUPPLIES
67014
1.95
APRIL MAINTENANCE OF INTERSECTIONS I
67015
3.832.50
REFUND DEPOSIT ^ERYIT 04)22
67016
500.00
«C 6701T -
67017 >11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
OCR - E.RI00: 05 -20 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE: 05/21/92 PALE:
... •.. •.......... ...........................•..... ....................................... a •.............. •.....•...•.............
VENDOR NAME IFEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMY.
...........................................•..............................•..........•..vv.... ......••.........................
Rt CHECFA
OVERLAP
95
CUCAMONGA CC WATFR d15Y
SERVICE CHARGE A
67018
6,831.54
Z39
0 L M CONCRETE CO
EDWIN 6 9tH STREET, R.C.
61019
363.12
204
DAISY MOEEL RIBBON CO, IHC
DATA CART 450 0
6TOZO
60.01
394
OATACOM SERVICE COMPANY
4AINTENANCE CONTRACT 6/1- 5/31/93
67021
1,260.00
6800
DE BONIS AND FAISION HdMES
0' /zRPAYMENT OF dUS. LIC. 414331
67022
14.50
2158
DEL MAR WIRE L PROJUCT3 CORP
15^ WHITE CABLE TIES
67023
49.96
1762
DENSON, JAMES
MILEAGE REIMS RESTROON LOCKUP 5117
67024
101.92
902
DEPT. OF TRANSPC3TATION D15TPICT 08
CITY "ARE OF MAINTENANCE
67025
5,239.94
1023
OGA CONSULTANT S, INC.
PLAN GAG SAN BERN DETENTION CTR
67026
1.820.23
523
EASTMAN, INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES A
62027
57.58
6796
EDWARD FRAPING, MICHAEL
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 019368
67028
16.30
459
EGGHEAD SOFTWARE
AFTER DARK
67029
25.86
1258
ELLIS, JANA
REFRESFMENTS FOR C.E.R.T. CL 06
67030
25_00
2498
Env AMERICA
BAG, ZIP LOCK
67D31
12.98
1714
EXECUTIVE PROGRAM
2 BOOKS CODE 66538 G $8030
67032
43.86
4908
FINE FEATHERED FRIENDS INC.
OYERPAI.ENi OF BUS. LIC. / 20557
67033
6.04
3197
FIRE MASTER
5 Ed. ABC EXTINGUISHERS 0
57034
291.10
3377
FITE, MATHERINE C.
PLAYSCY001. AIDE - PRE 5/17192
67D35
13.50
1844
FONTANA MOTORCYCLES INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 4
67036
550.38
1444
GARCIA, AMT
SCOREKEEPER - FEE 5/17/92
67031
20.25
1994
GILMET, VIRGINIA
PLAYSCFCOL INSTRUCTOR - PPE 5/17/92
6T038
59.64
3388
GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS. INC.
MISC. TREE MAINTENANCE - LOOT 0
61039
63,078.09
137
GTE CALIFORNIA
181 -1085 4
67040
4.056.77
3021
HARRISON, PICHAEL E.
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 5/17/92
67041
50.00
.�'3I2B
MAVEN PLAZA MEDICAL GROUR
PREPLACENENT PHYSICAL - MICHAEL GALLON
67042
90.00
2519
ME CXEIT SLAG PRODUCTS
3/4^ CLASS TX0 BASE
67043
73.21
2069
HEYDE. GONALL L.
CERT INSTRUCTOR /CLASS 64 9112/52
67044
62.50
2255
HOLT "S 'OTC ELECTRIC
REBUILT 100 AMP ALTERNATOR -UNIT 634
6TD45
91.59
2922
HUNSSERGFE. ANN
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
61046
64.50
495
HTURO -SCAPE PRODUCTS. INC
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES - ACCT 0 I090061
67047
98.87
4904
ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY
SOCIETY DUES - JULY 92 - JUME 93
67048
135.00
46
INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
EASE LINE RO - RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4
67049
334.30
2315
INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY
100 JUNIPER BLUE CARPET -8 CISTUS 0
67350
186.20
4907
JADE CONSULTING
OVERPAYMENF OF BUS. LIC. A 21862
67051
13.50
4910
JAY -DEE FAINT. L REPAIR SERVICE
REPAIR POST L SIGN DAMAGE
67052
110.00
2607
JWP INFGRMATIDN SY..TLMS
CUNTRACt SERVICE
67053
137.07
609
XLAINE, STEINER C UNGERER
AMERICAN INS V.RANCHO CUCAMONGA 003
61054
1:065.45
1218
KNOX
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 0
67055
458.91
321
LANDSCAPE WEST
T.Y. 5 6 T.V. T 4
6T056
80,6ZT.36
2134
LASER PERFECT
IF TONER CARTRIDGES
67057
105.59
1231
LEGI -TECH
SERVICES DURING APRIL 1992
61058
183.33
979
LEWIS HCFES
DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 0 5042
61059
1,000.00
4912
LOUIS REHM CCNSTRUCTION
DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 0 4915
67060
500.00
4314
LYON COMPANY, TOE WILLIAM
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. A 10593
61061
23.00
4905
MACCO CONSIRLCtCRS INC.
OVERPAYMEYT OF BUS. LTC. A 10394
67062
38.13
4906
MACE A /C, OTC, L REFRI.- RATION INC.
GVERPAYMENT OF '.US. LTC. 4 9739
67063
73.68
2952
MAILSORT. INC.
MEEK FNd I46 5/10/92
67064
81.20
549
MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL EYi.INC.
APRIL '32 4
67065
26.565.63
72
MARK CHRIS, INC.
VrHICLE .MAINTENANCE- UNIT 710
61066
48.33
76
MARKMAN,ARC2YNSXI,4ANSON.L KING
SERVICES RENDERED APRIL 1392
67067
15.239.45
4909
MEYER, MARJ1
REFUND CLASS A 'IS: - BIT A 9T104
67068
25.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
- LIST OF WARRANTS
PER PEPTIC: 05 -20 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE: 05/21/92 PAG`: 3
..........•........ a......... ................•..............................•....•uv.....••..... ..........•.............•.......
VENDOR NAME ITEM UESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
....... v•.... u••.•....u•u.....................•...............•... u......•.......•........• ... .................a•............
A. TOTAL _ 336.734.70
.1 CHECK'
OVERLAP
1919
MOYER PkGOCCIS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLTFS •
67069
290.19
4911
MONDAY, KAYE
500 SRI- 11X17 -60 GALAXY GOLD
61070
16.90
87S
11 3 `_ /LOWRY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST. 1 88 -2 1
67071
2.456.20
2246
NAPA AUTO PARTS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1
67072
259.34
4451
NATIONAL RECREATION E PARK ASSOC.
RENEWAL
67073
30.00
3437
NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICF
UNIFORP SERVICES 1
67074
373.35
122.
ORAN3E COUNTY SfRIPINS SVC, INC.
ANNUAL CONTRACT - VARIOUS LOCATIONS
67075
3.634.00
235
OPEN ELECTRIC
S.C. PULL BOXES A
67076
753.22
5243
P.F.S.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 822527
6TOT7
35.16
5731
PACIFIC WESTERN DOOR
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 4475
67078
77-67
818
PARAGON BUILCING PRODUCIS INC.
PORTLAND CPT IL PALLET DEPOSIT
67019
270.46
3463
PEREZ, MARIA E.
TUITION REIMB FOR P.E. EXAM REVIEW
6708D
425.00
2487
PHGENIX GRCUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CITATICNS -APRIL 1992
67081
4.4.50
1079
PHOTO MOOSE CF CALIFORNIA
PHOTO PRINTING C PROCESSING 1
67082
41.03
542
PIP PRINTING
ART IN THE PARA POSTER
61063
10.43
5 72 9
PLAZA TRAVEL
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 89963
67084
330.62
65
PRUDENTIAL CYERALL SUPPLY
MAT 46. MOP 4250, DUST CLOTH IA30 4
67085
96.32
714
RAM BUSINESS SYSTEMS
10000 COPIES
67066
175.00
5730
RANCHO ECUIPPENT LEASING CO-
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 116611
67087
17.57
3343
RANCHO MOBILE MCYES ScAVICE
COMPLETION BILLING -HELEN MEIER 1
67U88
61009.00
3456
RIGANO.A -I.A L ASSOCIATES, PAUL
REFUND OF APPLI FEES CUP92- 12 -PLNNG
61089
2.704.80
112
RITZ CAMERA CENTERS
USS INSTA PRINT 645412.80.11
67099
31.43
276
RIVERSICE BLUEPRINT
BLUELINL PRINTS, SETUP, STAPLING 1
67091
16.31
1732
ROSS FINANCIAL
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 49614
67092
37.00
5233
J
ROWELL. SUIETTE
CLASS REFUNO 96061r RCY891944
67093
25.00
3457
RUSSO-PEREYRA, JO LYNNE
STENCILS CURBSIDE RECYCLING
67094
33.44
905
SAFETY FLECN CORP
A/C AT 172 01 6330 1 4
67095
623.74
<<< 67096 -
67096 >>>
2536
SALAIZ. MARE ANN
PETTY CASH 4
67097
531.93
261
SAN BERN CC PRINTING 6 MAIL SVC
MAP SERVICES FOR APRIL 1992
67090
21.70
300
SAN BERN CO RECORDER
LIEN REMOVAL FOR APM1076- 401-49
67099
8.00
301
SAN BERN CO SHE -RIFFS
WORK RELEASE PAUL OROCO-S INC) INJRY
6T100
20.00
132
SAN DIEGO ROTARY 6ROOM CO. INC
1 SET MUDEL TOO GUTTER BROOMS
67101
66.81
5738
SIENNA VISTA BAPTIST CHURCH
DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT /5219
67102
1.000.00
3279
SO CALIF ECISON
i3 30 105 0617 01 000 2 1
6T103
493.87
317
SO CALIF ECISJN CO.
43 30 C30 6501 CI A
67104
73.740.90
A. TOTAL _ 336.734.70
C I OF RANCHO CUCAMONIGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCR PERIOD: 05 -21-92 091/92)
RUN DATE: 05/21/92 o4;H 1
.............. •............v v.a ......... a a. •........a... ......... ............................. ..•.•.................•.........
VEVDOA NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. AMT.
......... .......................... a............................ vv.................... •............................... a........
44 CHECR1
OVERLAP
317
SO CALIF ECISOx CO.
13 30 030 6SO1 BL 5
6T104
13.740.NO-
C« 51105 -
67140 »>
2436
CANCIAO. AATHY
PLAYSCFOOL INSTR AID PRE 5/1T
61141
400.00
949
CLARK. KAREN
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CLM6005
67142
198.00
3026
COROURA. ALCC
A.S000ER FIELD SUPERVISOR PPE 5117 1
67143
116.50
2650
DEL.ADO, J_51UA
ADULT 8.6. SCOREKEEPER EEL 5117
61144
63.25
2034
ESPOS iTO, LHWIIIINA
PLAYSCHOOL INSTR AID PPE 5 /l7
67145
220.40
3152
HARRISON. FIC4AFL N.
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL /PPE 4/17/91
6T146
100.00
3441
HEAVYSICE. PETE
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL /PPE 5/17/92
67147
50.00
3458
HEIN, PAT
INST AFT IN FULL CLASS 4 6311
67148
69.30
3020
HESSE, JOE
VOLLEYEALL OFFICIAL /PPE 5/IT/92
67149
75_00
3.08
HINSON. IE LT.
REC. ASST. - PPE 5f1T192
61150
332.75
631
HOLMES, SHEILA
PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR /PPE 5/17/92
67151
492.00
3459
HEBRAIC, BETH
AIDE SLB - PPE 5/17/92
67152
9.00
3022
JOHNSON. VIVIAN
PLAYSCPOCL AIDE /INSTR-PPE 5/1T/92
67153
263.54
3396
KELSET, ROGER
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL-PPE 5 /lT /92
67154
100.00
3112
<ING, ANGELA
Pt4YSCHODL AIDE / PRE 5/XT/92
61155
72.00
2171
KITCHEN. JAY
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL /PPE 5117192
67156
325.00
2399
KLJSMAN. CSRCL
PLAYSCHOOL AIDE / PRE 51ll/92
6T157
03.68
3460
LE VALLEY, WENDY
PLAYSCNODL SUB AIDE / PPE 5117/92
67158
10.00
3262
LEE, MICHAEL
SOCCER OFFICIAL - PPE 5/17/92
61159
75.00
2773
Li VESAT. CHUCK
86 6 V4 GYM SUPERVISOR /PPE 5117/92
61160
130.00
292
LCVUE. SALE
CLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR /PPE 5/IT/92
67161
312.00
3023
LUNT. BREN7 A.
4OULT BB OFFICIAL - PRE 5/17/92
67162
90.00
2830
LYNCH, BWCK
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL - PRE 5/17192
67163
90.00
3169
MAODERN, OARLEME M.
PLAYSCMOOL AIOF - PPE 5/17/92
61164
7200
.
]2Z
MA GAVLANFS. LINDA
INSTRUCTOR PHI tN FULL CLASS 4 54D0
61165
200 50
1361
MATCHAM, SHAWN
ART IN THE PARK - PPE 5117192
6T 166
77.00
2199
MC AROSE. TRACT
SOCCER FIELD SUPFRVS'SOR /PPE 5/17192
67167
36.00
2415
MEYER. CHARLIE
8.8. SCOREKEEPER - PPE 5/17/92
67168
57.50
2548
NIGRO, ANOREE-
PLAYSCYOOL INSTRUCTOR /PPE 5/17/92 4
67169
318.80
2686
OSBORN, BilH
SOFT9ALL SCOREKEEPER -PPE 5/11192
67170
108.00
3401
PELTIER, KEVIN
OFF -SITE REC ASST -PPE 5/17/92
67171
189.15
2805
9E NOER4P APH. RONALD
L.B. OFFICIAL - PRE 51l1192
67112
90.00
6013
PETERSON, 6RIA.
ART 1.4 THE PARK - PPE 5/17/92 4
67t73
169.50
2850
PORTER, DENNIS
REC. ASSISTANT - PPE 5117192
61174
255.75
2842
RAMOS. NICOLE
LIONS CTR REC ASST. / ARE 511T/92
67115
89.59
2632
REYES, ANNE
SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER - PPE 5/17/92
67116
108.00
3037
SCIORTINO. NICJLAS G.
SOCCER OFFLEI4L - P., 5111/92.
67177
175.00
535
SEMPLE. JULY
SENIOR FITNESS INST. / PPE 5/17/92
611T8
87.00
)IT
50 CALIF ECISDY CO.
43 30 030 6501 01 1
67I79
64.953.16
317
SO CALIF EDISON CO.
LITE INSTAL PUCHSTP /N:.HLH06630-4254
67180.
6.797.64
<<< 61181 -
67183 »>
1432
SO CALIF ECISON- -47TN: SHEILA LUNA
53 39 105 1560 02 000 B 0
67 184
3.132.56
319
SO CALIF 545 C3.
05 3169 239 1706 2 1
67185
2780
STEPHENS, HOGSTCN
6.B. UFFICIAL - PPE 5117/92
67106
90.00
5164
STOOOARC, LIZ
CLASS REFUND 4"11, 9CTY980S6
61187
2.00
2669
SWANSON. EL&
ART IN THE PARK - PPE 511/192
67188
126.50
3461
TRRBELLr ANGELA
ANG
PLAYSCH OOL RIDE SU9 /PPE 5/19/92
67189
36.00
3036
TRIMBLE,
SUCCPR 'OFFICIAL - PPE 5111192
67190
50.00
3409
TPIMBL Er LtlPINA
A7RIN
AEC. ASST. - PoE S111191
67191
34 i.tlN
CITY OF RANCRC CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
ECR °FR[D0: OS -Zi -92 (91/92)
64 TOTAL 19.545.66
RAIN DATE:
05/21/92 PEG,: t
e•v...+•
. . . . . . . .
9FNDUR
..uu...uu
. . . . . . . . . . . . . u vuv. aaa a....—....
NAME
.......................... ...............uv.................
..............ovo... MV.......-..... A....
(TEM IESCRIPTI4N WARR
u u u u..............................
..............................•....
NO
MARK. 4M7.
................
A* CHECK$
OVERLAP
5731
TSENG. FRIEOE R.
PARTIAL REFUND OF APPLI- CUP92 -12
6T 192
195.20
1113
TURNER, E.STMF2
REINS FJR PEP DAY TROPHY A
61193
216.19
5121
TUMSKY. JAREC
CLASS REFUND 95321, RCT190329
67194
40.00
2958
U-PS ARE US ASSOCIATI14
UMP SVC 5116- 6/30/92
6T195
1.309.00
553
UWISTRUT LDS AICELES
MAN04L ORIY^ CAP MODEL 9TL222 1
67196
344.95
5135
UNITED AEROSPACE INOUSTWI "ES
6VERPaY4ENT OF BUS LIC 111075
67197
649.99
5101
UNITED MODEL UISTR18UTORS
OVERP4YMF4T BUS LIC 112521
6T198
373.01
426
UNITED PACIFIC CORPORATION
WALK :TN BARK A
67199
1.950.DO
1054
UNITED TITLE COMPANY
80NO PAYOFF REFUND APN 1076- 401 -49
67200
202.91
689
UPLAND LOCK AND SAFE
OUR FORT SAFE KEYS
61201
1.27
3283
UVA, STEVE
SOCCER FIELD SUPERVISOR /PPE 5/11/92
67202
109.00
5736
VAN FLEET, SUTANNE
CLASS REFUND 16034, RCT1986T5
67203
35.00
3556
VAN VALKENdLRGa, SUSAN
PLAYSCMOOL INSTRUCTOR -P:E 5117/92 8
672D4
142.T6
474
VFRMEER-CALIFDWNIA
CAP 6 TANK A54D
61205
17.42
<<< 6T206 -
67206 »>
667
VISA
4620 0051 8161 1203 9
67207
1.690.62
1103
VISTA PAINT
AURA GLIOE BASE. BRICK MATCH. FRAHEI
67200
238.74
213
WAXIE. KLEEM -LINE CORP
MISC MAINT SOPPLIESI /CA331433100 8
67209
569.30
637
WEST ENO UNIFORMS
SLIM JIM
67ZLO
34.10
A77
WEST PURLISWIN6 CO
C4 RLS CT -STDPO 9201 8
61211
31.52
374
ESTERN EXTERMINATOR
A/U676555 -4 9
67112
213.00
S382
WESTERN TEMP3RARY SERVICES
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LID 82063
67213
184.24
5048
WESTERN TILE A40 TOPS INC.
OVERP.1 -ENT OF BUS LIC 113739
67214
17.60
345
WHITNEY MACHINERY
HYDRAULIC CYLINDER -9646 4
67215
334.85
509
XEROX CCRRCRATION
1090 DLPL 9698684172
67216
509.42
2098
ZAGORIN, XEITM
TENNl, COURT SUPERVISOR /PPE 5/17192
67217
46.15
5737
74INFELC. JACOB
CLASS RE'UNO 16041. ROT 096144
61218
12.00
3110
LANILA, DX4!
ADULT e.M_ OFFICIAL.' PPE 5111/92
67219
135.00
348
ZEP MANLFACTLRINS COMPANY
ZE_P •0
6722D
46.05
64 TOTAL 19.545.66
MAY 1 s GELD
CO• • p � ANJJµr..11 Y4. W Net F/•In IEwe rYr SNe-In rley^nrM1n OM aMI
W EEE*EE IM MCONOEK RR11gAW INRNTRl1)
I. DepnlMnl of A olvolir Beve,ope ConeW
IMm IAOodwy S.cto Barber. Far
50000veo, CoA1, 9551¢ ¢fveemlde
I r l ie,'fa ,...... ;...�.,,a.;
I, TYFE151 OF IICENSE(5)
FILE HO.
riff -Set¢ Beer 6 Woo
I
Applied older 5n. ¢EW r []
Eff mva Don;
R`CEIFT NO.
604696
GZOGRAWI
LODE 3312-01
Dan
reel
2 NAME(S) OF AFRKANT(S)
f q. Mvmll
Ho
ERnRre Dore.
Smart n Ffnal Stares Carporetion
_
3, TYPES) OF TRANSACTIONS)
FEE
LK.
TYFE
LOOS Stoat 'Irene far (26071,1)
S 100.00
20
u
A
1. NOM el 6ni.
$WCt .1nat
"r
) oAlog
I u
J. I of f M,rinn- -Numbe, ad So.
9675 Beeeliee ¢d.
Cihad Zip Cede Cewry
r ncno co.,on._4121a— _6,5eiDnedim_
\ j TOTM
S 100,0
__.
6. If be-Ho tiOenred, F. A. bemire. tn"
_ SM. Trpr of Lion-• Type 10 __ Gh Limm? Ls
IT. Mail, AM,. (if dif rnnl 0. S) -Nun Wr and Street P..p rro.l
9 Hove You eve, bwn ram[nd a a f el 10. How You ern eioloW uoy of Fie poelriaaF of tM Alcobdic
.l r Revamps Cemrol Aa or 11.66— of the Dap .o, per
No loino, to The AA? No
11. Rpble O'TES" omwr n ov., 9 or 1n en on enarhmra which -hall be deemed pe I of 1MF ciMlik fen.
i w 12. A,Ll Lim ORwn In1 lhar any — ivHHE- —&,of in on vole Lcanwd Memnn will To- all dre gwlif aiom OI a &ee a an e, d
1 (b) lb., he will nor —W. or anon ar We, R To be vinlmed any of the prerhnn, of five Al-Wia U-1.1e Cw11o1 40
13 STATE OF CAUFORNIA� C.,O, of .._.... Zoe_Ing lu _ ! IS 93
�Y+, wvNn • • v w r
u.nr w ..v. -1 n.er J m...o.n. ;v .-.. ,w ..nnn .r.rn...e+ h - „ee.. -, p .,a. ;n. err•N..; n ,4 ;....n.
e nrn n r v
11 NT
SIGNER
SIGN HERE
T
.... _ ! �
Lone d 1 Alvarado
APPLICATION BY TPANSRgOt
15. STATE Of LAIWOMNIA cowry of....... ! AR.A 91i1RdL. ___...__.DoA...._...dLUM- -_____
hn
se
•nln en �ww.IW •n••N.r•n rerN •n evwev-
MnN ,M nn•F.• vA.o
MNolWile&I. TAFL GOq For FirpaNmrnl U. tErff, V~ Dietrf t Mdil notify
AHUMd (�(Rnordvf m1kr,
rfid iiwy Repery
_ ............... .......... .. -COMES MA6ED __..__",..'
_......_.__.... .......... . .........
m•x-e,
❑Rerre.el: Fee el „$3t ;OO pedm .�:rsmmlf o__.,_.._...016.. on.,.. — Rocitip o
BASELINE
l u l l
1-T-F-H-�
SMART & FINAL APN 207 - 022 -24
13675 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
A business within the Sunrize Center
at the SWC Baseline /Carnelian
Property currently zoned: Neiqhbornood Corvnercial
Zoninq of Adjacent Properties:
North: Low Residential
South: Medium Residential
East: Office /Professional
West: Vacant /Flood Control District
sasse
(IR /Q9
Ct I.. wwe. -a.w.. r
AaMKArIW1 #GA ASCCf1OEM: NSYYA9S MUMS)
1. TYMSI Of IICENSCj51
tiff
To: Deyarmml OF AkvWk r . C."
McE rt No.
5998)]
IPoI b•od•W r.a ft" for
Se<rmrm, C.Gi. 95SIt 1rlr.r.ld.
Off Sal. Gen.1.5
Giaawq l
..n.:......:w.w . w..
Cdlf 3615
TM aM«.gn.d FaMy aqJ <br
�
Ivwd
I.mw<dev:Md w Idb.a
ArRlkd wre.. s<. }.O<, g
}, NAME(S) Of AP?t A (SI
T.mp, Fam;1
Foad 6 Dsul Castes Ix,
Ntedi» D 5 -8 -93
Ea.,. Dore: '
J -,3 •ry 21- 355816
3. TYPE(S) OF TSANSACTIOMS)
FEE
lK.
iYf!
3
Ycp xt 3.o Mnurdlno
G.000.00
31
MAY 1? u['o
f 19ror
mat, for ,99,
W<.1 t #51)16
4
54 a. rw.3vt #575.31
.r"new
8O&L[\.a rmd S Drar Coma • #]02
5, lawbn d #e0non -Nwnha cm, SMa
R/V corwr of FOOrhill s 15agard
Annual Is.
446.49
31
tia1111MOMlallf ONNOxfb
CM and LR CeG Cway
--
S
BapChLS 9V30 9Y S.mardlaa
R.Lnc. Do. TOTAI
446.00
SM. iyq .f lkmw r. A:. rv.nn.» In1bo
ryL' 1•
S. Malirq Ad . (il dRawr I»nl S/ -Naebw aM 36M •.yr.,m.;
1<m <. _� •_mil
<am coy? r • 1df0
e. Ne...w mr bwn abd d a l.bnrT I/A. 100
. Nwe sm .•a ndol.d odd:. .1 m< d Mo ooc W.
S.»ru9. Comm! 1N a r.aelelle» el the Dep.mn.nl W.
dwq bdw A.11 Y
i,. E.pla;n v "YES" m..a 1. R o 9 a 10 m Do samhmom whl<6 droN M d»m.d pal OF Mi. epcR<cac,
12 Applk.m .m.w (el Na am mempr .mpby.d k m wl. Ik-unf p.;..01 h.m ell am q.elM<.Mnr Of . ;,mn w, .M
1 rhol M .11 ml • ola. a <ww a puma b M ri OW m] d Me pbKdm. d M Ak.M1di< Iwa.9e C I Ao.
13 STATE ..O.i r 1Y � cw ry et. � nJYC�_n k4c_____.
`- -.�_. q Z
ACaLW L re District 5-8-92 _ .-.-
A. �.. � �.•wm... .
•w.�ur rw•u -.� w.:r� u
.r. • u w • rti ...r r N ::..rr.:n.....
..ww..,. r r• <:.... ' :..... r w:w.r'. n w,... w.:... + N .w...... ".. ~:. :�: -.<� .......
n•
w
i< HERE Sl rt • 9U �N ^A M0 Trar
SIGN NfllE 1_______ _ �_ __. :� �. •.N
'I w EIVED AMkXjkV0V 'I�+(A1i' Et N
11.E E Of CALIFORNIA Cvonry N_. -. - . -.._.. ~_`•_ P! _, -, _
+�/'° 1 ate• L�•.M6
�, w �� <n. w�a.. a n• w
I..: "��R.�� n . r e....:..i....• ...a:.. w n«.I...':.. »..�sr. wr.:'rw"�....<...... «+.:.
M Not WNte M. Mir Line; For Oeparcbml U. Ehdp
Anahed: r; faadod :writ, �/_ .>
❑ .----- ..--- .._ -------------
-............... -- .._.._ron[s
❑ b». vl: Md----------- Md M ----- - --- ----- - -- --- _.-- - -011k m-- '- ------ ---- --ll »eiM Ne. ..-..---------------
a r.:.:.. T . nm
Currently Zoned: Community Commercial
in Subarea 2 of the
Foothill Specific Plan
Zoning of Adjacent Properties:
North: Medium Residential in Subarea 2
of the Foothill Specific Plan
South: Community Commercial in Subarea 2
��•- of the Foothill Specific Plan
-,` East: Special Commercial in Subarea 2
/ \ of the Foothill Specific Plan
West: Office in Subarea 2 of the
Foothill Specific Plan
--
SMITH'S FOOD R DRUG LC_C�L114 ��
CENTERS, INC. Sini th's Food & Drug,
NWC FOOTHILL R VINEYARD!' �a 9'�
.- Centers, Inc.
I ':.
;qPN 207- 102 -20
s,
Foothill Blvd.
it - - -'' -�- - - --- --��
rQ a LI
FOOTHILL_ BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN
PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I3
sasse
05/19/92
BACKGROUND: During the months of March and April, 1992,
commissioners from the Perk and Recreation Commission
interviewed applicants for the bilingual, senior and sports
advisory committees. The Commission took action on May 20th
at their regular meeting to recommend approval to the City
Council that the following individuals be appointment to
their respective committees. It was felt that the
individuals recommended would be willing and able to provide
sound ideas and input on issues regarding bilingual, senior
and sports concerns for the city of Rancho Cucamonga.
Bilinaual Advisory Committee:
Sophie Flores - currently a member of the committee. Has
expressed a strong desire to assist /work with the city's
bilingual community.
Bernice Flynn - Lives in the Old Town area and has expressed
a desire to work with the bilingual community.
Alma McGuire - Currently a member of the Committee. Lives in
the Old Town area and is very active in the community.
Alicia Mangin - Currently a member of the Committee. Has
expressed an interest in helping with activities for the
bilingual community,
Alice Kedrano - Currently a member of the committee. Has
expressed a desire to serve the community.
CPI'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
'-
DATE:
June 3, 1992
TO:
Mayor, Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
11`I
Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager /Acting
Community Services Director
BY:
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II �2
SUBJECT:
Appointments - Bilingual, Senior and Sports
Advisory Committees
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the following
citizens
to serve on
the respective advisory committee as recommended
by the Park
and Recreation Commission at its May
20, 1992
meeting. Terms
of appointment would commence July
1, 1992
and conclude
June 30, 1993.
BACKGROUND: During the months of March and April, 1992,
commissioners from the Perk and Recreation Commission
interviewed applicants for the bilingual, senior and sports
advisory committees. The Commission took action on May 20th
at their regular meeting to recommend approval to the City
Council that the following individuals be appointment to
their respective committees. It was felt that the
individuals recommended would be willing and able to provide
sound ideas and input on issues regarding bilingual, senior
and sports concerns for the city of Rancho Cucamonga.
Bilinaual Advisory Committee:
Sophie Flores - currently a member of the committee. Has
expressed a strong desire to assist /work with the city's
bilingual community.
Bernice Flynn - Lives in the Old Town area and has expressed
a desire to work with the bilingual community.
Alma McGuire - Currently a member of the Committee. Lives in
the Old Town area and is very active in the community.
Alicia Mangin - Currently a member of the Committee. Has
expressed an interest in helping with activities for the
bilingual community,
Alice Kedrano - Currently a member of the committee. Has
expressed a desire to serve the community.
Advisory Committee Appointments
June 3, 1992
Page 2
Tess Rodriquez - Currently on the committee. Has expressed
an interest in finding ways to serve and improve the
bilingual /hispanic community within Rancho Cucamonga.
vivian Ruff - Currently on the committee. Has expressed
desire to continue serving the community by bringing all
residents of Rancho Cucamonga together through worthwhile
functions.
Senior Advisory Committee:
Thomas Baillie - currently on the Committee. As a senior
himself, Mr. Baillie has stated that he feels he should be
invovled.
Wilma Brenner - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a
continuing interest to promote programs in the best interest
of the seniors.
David Dominguez - Currently on the Committee. Has indicated
that he would like to continue his tenure on the Committee to
ensure that goals and ideas are carried out. Also, being a
non - senior Mr. Dominguez has stated that he feels he can
bring "an outsiders view" and insight. into the needs and
opportunities for seniors in the community.
Dorothy Henson - Currently on the Committee. Being a senior
herself, Ms. Henson has expressed an interest and
understanding of senior problems and concerns.
Esther Humphries - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed
a desire to be involved in the community. Has had experience
with Los Angeles County Park and Recreation.
Betty Linker - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a
desire to be active and participate in senior activities.
Also wants to have some input into senior issues.
Nancy McCormick - Currently on the Committee. Is interested
in senior issues and city activities.
Mabel Mercer - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a
desire to work with seniors; is aware of needs of seniors
since she herself is a senior citizen.
fS
Advisory Committee Appointment
June 3, 1992
Page 3
Grace Parker - Has expressed an interest in serving her
community. Is concerned with the welfare of all citizens.
Kathy Peters - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed an
interest in outreach services for the community. Feels this
Committee might help.
Joyce Ryther - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a
desire to be of service to the community. Enjoys people and
working with them. Also enjoys volunteer service.
Arnold Steenburg - Currently on the Committee. Likes
volunteering and is very interested in the welfare of the
community.
Edna Steenburg - Currently on the Committee. Also likes
volunteering and is interested in the welfare of the
community.
Elmer Steeve - Has expressed an interest in seniors and the
part they play in community life.
Wilma Steeve - Has expressed an interest in helping all
seniors and in improving our community.
Elbert Wilkerson - Has expressed a concern about what happens
in and for seniors in the community. Feels that this
committee is an avenue to help seniors.
Snorts Advisory Committee:
Bob Olari - Currently on the Committee. Alta Loma Little
League board designee.
Paul Getchy - Currently on the Committee. Pony Colt Little
League President.
Howard Young - Currently on the Committee. President of ACE
T -Ball.
Jean Lombardo - Currently on the Committee. President of
American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO).
Bill Walcolm - Currently on the Committee. President of R.C.
Softball.
1�O
Advisory Committee Appointment
June 3, 1992
Page 4
Paul Moore - Currently on the Committee. President of R.C.
American Legion (baseball).
Paul Finkleman - Currently on the Committee. President of
Alta Loma American Legion (baseball).
John Ruckolls - Currently on the Committee. Board designee
of Pop Warner Football.
Dan Rosso - Currently on the Committee. President of
Vineyard Little League.
Carmen Angelo - Currently on the Committee. President of
R.C. Spirits (girls fast pitch softball).
Priao Morales - Currently on the Committee. President of
Rancho Little League.
Ginny Venzor - Currently on the Committee. President of
Citrus Little League.
Joe Albers - Currently on the Committee. President of ACE
Youth Softball.
Terry Thomas - Currently on the Committee. Board designee of
CYSA (club soccer).
Eric Jay Sieber - Currently on the Committee. Board designee
of Deer Canyon Little League.
Jerre Llyod - At -Large Community Member. Active user of
existing sport facilities in Rancho Cucamonga and other
southern California communities. Has expressed a commitment
to both youth and adult sports activities not only because of
the recreational and educational value of sports, but also as
an alternative to other more negative ways in which idle time
gets used (drinking, drugs, gangs, etc.).
Calvin Ruff - At -Large Community Member. Has expressed an
interest in sports and feels he could represent the opinion
of an average citizen without ties to a particular sport
organization.
Advisory Committee Appointments
June 3, 1992
Page 5
Sandy Spetnagel - At -Large Community Member. Feels she can
make a positive impact on the way youth sport programs
interact with the City. Has expressed a need to be proactive
to ensure success of programs.
David Vize - At -Large Community Member. Has expressed an
interest in promoting healthy activities that will benefit
the citizens of our community, especially youth. Has strong
background in organized sports in other California
communities.
Lastly, it is recommended that the term of appointment for
the Bilingual, Senior and Sports Advisory Committees run from
July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993. This change will allow
recruitment to occur mid -year rather than at the end of the
calendar year during the holiday season as it was previously
scheduled.
Respectfully submitted,
Jsrry Fulwood
Deputy City Manager
Acting Community Services Director
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
_n.... June 3, 1992
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lan, AICP, City Manager
?RCM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner /CDBG Coordinator
SOn_J6CT: TRANSFER OF FUNDS COMMUTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PROGRAM - The incremental transfer of $66,149 from the
1990-91 phase of the multi -year Comma pity Development
Block Grant funded Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement
Project to various program year phases of this project.
RECOP94 DATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve, by minute action., the
transfer of funds in the total amount of $66,149 from the 1990 -91
Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project to various program years
as follows: 54,226 to the 1967 -88 phase: $22,320 to the 1988 -89 phase;
530,500 to the 1989 -90 phase; and $9,103 to the 1991 -92 phase.
ABSTRACT
The malortty of the transfers 'nave already occurred by incremental
process over the last 1 1/2 years. however, with additional transfers
required to onplete the 1989 -90 program year project, the total amount
of funds to be transferred from the 1990 -91 program year will exceed 25
percent of the originally approved amount (the actual amount is
28 percent) and therefore, requires an amendment to that years' Final
Statement and in turn, the Final Statements of the other affected
program years.
ANALYSIS
The street improvements to .Sierra Madre from Arrow Route to 9th Street,
funded through ^,he 1989-90 CDBG Program, were originally estimated to
require :,250,000 to complete. In the following year, upon further
analysts, the cost estimates for this project were reduced. As a
result, to May of 1!90, $80,400 from the 1989 -90 program year ( Acrount
No. 28- 4333 -99511 was transferred out to complete the 1988 -89 (Account
No. 28- 4333 -8811) Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project,
lvavinq $169,600 for the 1989 -90 project.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CDBG - TRANSFER OF FUNDS
June 3, 1992
Page 2
_t -'as been estimated that additional funds will be rea_uired in this
fiscal year to complete the Sierra Madre Street project. Therefore, it
-s recommended that $30,500 be transferred from the 1990 -91 Southwest
Cucamonga Street project (Account Na. 29- 4333 -9025) to the 1989 -90
Southwest Cucamonga Street project (Account No. 28 -4333- 8951). This
transfer of $30,500 will result in a total of $66,149 in .'ands which
ha-.-e been transferred from the 1990 -91 project year to other project
years leaving a remaining balance of $127,101 for the 1990 -91 program
year. The total allocated to the Sierra Madre Street project after
transfers will be $219,600.
A. noted in the Abstract section of this report, previous funds
transferred included: $26,546 to close out accounts No. 28- 4333 -6811,
No. 97041 and No. 8812 and $9,103 which was transferred to account No.
28 -4333 -9044 for the design of Calaveras Street from 9th Street to
Chaffey Alley.
CITIZEN PMrICIPATION
The City's Citizen Participation Plan for the CDBG Program requires
that, prior to approving any change to the allocation of CDBG funds that
would add, delete, or change any CDBG project or funding allocation by
25 percent or more, the public be notif.ed and provided an opportunity
to comment on the change. A public notice was published in the Inland
V211ey Daily Bu Llet in newspaper. Upon consideration of the proposed
transfer of funds by the City Council under the Consent Calendar, the
Citizen's Participation requirements will be met.
'ne /sP ly subm ed,
F
/ Brad let
City Planner
BB:CN:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Southwest Cucamonga Area Map
PR
C!ry� TRUCTION
UCOV'''ET ED I
ir
G Q 1 IN GRESS
W u
C03 1
i � SALINA AVE
t 1
z 1
• ' 1
North
0 90-91
C 91 -92
--- AREAQUALIFYING
FOR CDBG FUNDS
NEEDED STREET
I,MPROVEMENTS
t.......�....^� IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED
FOR 1987 -1988
IWROVEMENTAUTHORIZED
FOR 1988 -1989
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
0000 IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED
FOR 1989 -1990
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED
Au• FOR 1990-1991
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED
FOR 1991 -1992
D - DESIGN AUTHORIZED ONLY
C- CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED ONLY
ITEM:
ZA TITLE: _
EXHIBIT: -A—SCALE: _
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
C
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL, SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE
SYSTEM) IN THE AMOUNT OF $297.48 PER ACRE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council levy a special tax of $297.48 per acre by
approving the attached Resolution that establishes the annual special tax for
Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System), which
reflects a decrease of $52.52 from the Fiscal Year 1991/92 rates.
' 1 LU1
In 1984 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of
Community Facilities District No. 84 -1, authorized the district to incur bonded
indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. Bonds were issued in
August of 1985 in the amount of $18,000,000 to finance the construction of the
Day Creek Channel. In 1986, the area between Milliken, Rochester, Highland
and the northerly city limits was annexed into the district.
Construction began on Phase I during fiscal year 1987 /88. Phases II and IIIA
construction have also been completed. Phase ITIB construction is currently
being completed. The maximum rate for the special tax was set at $550 per
acre when the district was formed. However, since fiscal year 1985/86, the rate
has been $350 per acre with additional funding being contributed by the
Redevelopment Agency.
On April 1, 1992, . City Council approved Resolution No. 92 -079 authorizing
issuance of 1992 refunding special tax bonds for this district. The down -turn in
the economy had pushed the interest rates low enough to equate to savings for
the property owners. These savings have allowed staff to decrease the special
tax rate from $350 per acre to $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1992/93.
Respe tfully submitted,
/ f
Jim Hart
Administrative Services Director
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit "A'
Yearly Status Report 22
RESOLUTION NO. qI -/(�-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY
CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency'), has
initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received
a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax
in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter
2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of
California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to
as
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1
(Day Creek Drainage System)
(hereinafter referred to as the 'District'); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes
of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by
Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized
the levy of' a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said
Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish
the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next Fiscal Year.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SFCTI N 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax
to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 19$1• -92 q3
for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in
the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A ".
SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the
amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is
nor in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the
District.
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to
pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of
priority:
A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding
authorized bonded indebtedness; and
B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other
reserve funds; and
C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities
and public services; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate
The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not
be used for any other purpose.
SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner
as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the
same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad
valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable
administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.
SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the
Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund.
SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter
in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite
each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements,
special tax ", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special
tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the
attached Exhibit "A ".
SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax
collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the
amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and
percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a
statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such
collection.
L�
Resolution No.
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of June, 1992.
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: Wright
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
25
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FACHdTIES DISTRICT NO. 94 -1
(DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
EXHIBIT 'W
The Community Facilities District has been divided into two zones:
ZONE 'A': General areas to be served by the drainage facilities,
exclusive of Zone "B ".
2. ZONE "B ": A limited area, being only partially served by drainage
facilities. Zone "B ": consists of those properties bounded
on the south by FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, on the East by
ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North by BASELINE ROAD,
and on the West by MILLIKEN AVENUE.
The rate, method and formula for the levy of the special tax for the
respective zones. being Zone "A" and zone "B ", is as follows, based upon an
estimated bond amount of $16,530.000 payable over a period of twenty (14)
years.
ZONE "A ": $297.48 PER ACRE.
ZONE'B ": $297.48 PER ACRE FOR 190 ACRES.
For the purpose of defining the maximum special Tax. "ACRE" shall mean
acres contained in the area of the parcel as determined using the acres as
shown on the latest San Bernardino County Assessor's maps.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MELLO -ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1
DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM
YEARLY STATUS REPORT
JUNE 1992
BACKGROUND
On June 26. 1984, the electors within the boundaries of Community
Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorised the
District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of
$20,225,000. In August 1985 bonds in the amount of $18.000.000 were
issued to finance the construction and installation of public capital drainage
facilities to serve and provide drainage protection to all properties located
within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek
Drainage System). In March of 1986 the area bounded on the west by
Milliken Avenue, on the north by the northerly City limits, on the east by
Rochester Avenue and on the south by Highland Avenue was annexed into
the district.
The first annual special tax rate of $350 per acre was set by City Council in
Fiscal Year 1985 /86. This rate has never been increased in the ensuing
fiscal years. However, on May 5, 1992, the City conducted a refunding of
this district. Bonds were issued for $16,530,000.00 to cover the remaining
debt. The savings from this refunding were passed on to the residents and
decreased the special annual tax from $350 per acre to $297.48 per acre.
Under the Loan and Pledge Agreement the Redevelopment Agency
contributes sufficient funds each fiscal year, that when combined with the
special tax meet the requirements of the annual debt service payment.
During fiscal year 1987/88 construction of Phase 1 improvement began and
was completed in 1988/89. Construction of Phases II and IIIA has also been
completed. Construction of Phase IIIB is currently being completed. The
construction contract is administered by the County of San Bernardino,
FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
The current rate of $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1992/93 along with the
Redevelopment Agency contribution of $918,830 will provide sufficient
funding to pay debt service in the amount of $1.777,103.
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS
USES:
DEBT SERVICE $1.777.103
ADMINISTRATION & OVERHEAD $ 93.646
DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS L 80.166
$1.950.915
SOURCES:
INTEREST REVENUE $ 30,000
SPECIAL TAX $1,002,085
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $ 918.83
$1,950.915
$297.45 PER ACRE
Note: In fiscal year 1993194, prior year delinquent special taxes
received will be included as a SOURCE.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
$
STAFF REPORT
_
DATE: June 3, 1992
699
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council.•'
$
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager'..
-
FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director
420
BN Ingrid Blair, G.I.S. /Special Districts Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT)
Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached Resolution
establishing the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88 -2
(Drainage and Law Enforcement). There is no increase from the current tax
rate for developed properties for Fiscal Year 91/92 rates. There is however,
a decrease in the undeveloped tax rate from $1,725 an acre to $1,344 an
acre.
Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities
Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.)
$
944
Residential Class 11 (3077 -3589 S.F.)
$
699
Residential Class I11 (2564 -3076 S.F.)
$
524
Residential Class IV (2308 -2563 S.F.)
$
420
Residential Class V (2051 -2307 S.F.)
$
349
Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.)
$
245
Undeveloped Property
$1,344
/acre
Special Tax B - law Enforcement
Residential Class 1 (3590 + S.F)
$113.28
Residential Class II (3077 -3587 S.F.)
$
50.65
Residential Class 111 (2564 -3076 S.F.)
$
50.40
Residential Class IV (2308 -2563 S.F.)
$
40.32
Residential Class V (2051 -2307 S.F.)
$
33.60
Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.)
$
23.52
BA�KGROUNDJANALY I8
On June 21, 1989, City Council approved the formation of Community
Facilities District No. 88 -2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law
Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to
finance only the drainage facilities, police operations and maintenance costs.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
C.F.D. 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT)
June 3, 1992
Page 2
The special tax being levied annually for the drainage facilities are in special
Tax A - drainage Facilities. These taxes are being used to reimburse The
Caryn Company for facilities constructed per the Purchase/ Financing
Agreement (CO 89 -111) approved by City Council on June 21, 1989. This
action will lower the bond indebtedness when the bonds are finally issued.
The levy of special taxes annually for the police protection services are listed
in Special Tax B - law Enforcement. These taxes will be used to cover the
services provided by the police in this area. Staff is not recommending any
increase in the tax rate for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Respe tfully sub ' led,
Jim Hart
Administrative Services Director
JH:IB:jmf
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit "A'
Map
32
RESOLUTION NO. �J- «�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88 -2
(DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency "), has
initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received
a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax
in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter
2.5 , Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of
California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to
as
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2
(Drainage and Law Enforcement)
(hereinafter referred to as the 'District "); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes
of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by
Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized
the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said
Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish
the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct,
ACTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax
10to he collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year
4'9.— 9 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set
forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A ".
'ECTION ;J; That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the
amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is
not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the
District.
33
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to
pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of
priority:
A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding
authorized bonded indebtedness; and
B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other
reserve funds; and
C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities
and public services; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate.
The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not
be used for any other purpose.
SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner
as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the
same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad
valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable
administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.
SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the
Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund.
SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter
in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite
each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements,
special tax ", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special
tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the
attached Exhibit "A ".
SUTIQN 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax
collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report. showing the
amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and
percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a
statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such
collection.
3y
Resolution No.
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ___ day of June, 1992.
AYES: Alexander, Ruquet, Stout, Williams
NOES: None
A13SENT: Wright
35
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2
EXHIBIT "A„
The Resolution establishing the amoral special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of
the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
SPECIAL TAX "A'- DRAINAGE FACILITIES
PROPERTY CATEGORIES
There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A ", which are identified
as follows:
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessors•'s parcel
for which properly a building penult has been issued as of
May 31 of any year.
2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property. excluding property which, as of the
date of the election to authorize the Icvy of Spectal Tax "A:,
is: (it owned by a public entity: (it) owned by a regulated
public utility and being utilized for transmission or
distribution purposes: or (W) zoned as open space.
TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND
SPECIAL TAIL "A' RATES
The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A"
rates for Fiscal Year 1991/92 are as follows:
Taxinc Classiflca Ion Tax Rate
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class 1
$944 per year
(More than 3.590 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
B. Residential 11
$699 per year
(3.077 -3.569 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
C. Residential III
$524 per year
12.564 -3.076 square feet of
dwelling unit living areal -
D. Residential Class IV
$420 peryezr
(2,308 -2.563 square feel of
dwelling unit living area)
Taxng C1assJicatton
11. Residential Class V
12,051 -2,307 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
F. Residential Class VI
(Less than 2.051 square feet of
dwelling unit living areal •
G. Commercial or industrial property
2. UNDEVEWPED PROPERTY
All Undeveloped Property
Tax Rate
$349 per year
$245 per year
$2.030 per acre per year `•
$1,344 per acre per year •"
The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of
internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space,
as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit.
The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage
exclusive of anv acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency.
•" The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any
acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency.
N THOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPF.CW. TAX "A"
Special Tax 'A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above
identified Properly Categories so long as Special Tax "A" revenues are necessary to pay
authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of
authorized public facilities, which may include, without limitation. payment of debt service on
any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District: replenishment of any required
reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness: funding of any required sinking fund necessary
to pay for future public facilities or debt service: or direct payment for public facilities (CFD
Expenses').
The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows:
STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses
which must be paid for from Special Tax "A" revenues collected during the Fiscal
Year for which the Special Tax "A" levy Is to be established (the "Required
Special 'fax "A" Revenue''),
STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 91% of the
maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property
Taxing C lassifica l ions necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the
Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue for such
Fiscal Year shat; be levied nn all Developed Property,
STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A' revenues are still necessary to generate the
Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum authorized
Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to
generate such additional Special 'Pax "A" revenue shall be levied on all
Undeveloped Property.
STEP 4: if additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the
Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum
authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing
Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue
shall be levied on all Developed Property.
STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the
Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall:
A. Compare (I) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each
Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (11) the
product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed
Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A ". The Rase Maximum
Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square fool of the
lot or parcel.
B. If the product described in (it) above exceeds the Special Tax "A" rate
described in (I) above for any Developed Property, the Community
Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax "A" rate levied on each
such Developed Property In equal percentages up to the rate not to cxceed
the product described In (it) above necessary to generate the additional
Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues.
SPECIAL TAX 'B' - LAW ENFORCEMENT
Ali Developed Properly shall be subject to the levy or Special Tax "B ". The authorized Special
Tax "B" rates for Fiscal Year 1991 -1992 are as follows:
Taxing sifl ClasAmu
L DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class 1
$113.28 per year
(More than 3,590 square feel of
dwelling unit living areal '
B. Residential Class 11
$50.65 per year
13.077 -3.589 square feet of
dwelling unit living areal '
C. Residential Class Ill
550.40 per year
(2,564 -3,076 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) '
D. Residential Class IV
$40.32 per year
(2,308 - 2.563 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) '
F;. Residential Class V
$33.60 per year
(2.051.2,-;07 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) '
F. Residential Class VI
8123.52 per year
(Less than 2,051 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
G. Commercial or industrial property
$1,000 per acre per year 04
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES
OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2
OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
y
n • +en.. vw
2-Tv/
• vie ne uc. /
]}; }� •�., .p Sep
SCALE 1* = 600'
LELCUq_
'- 'il'e.��r� � auo .• nw
pry rL ie. .Tl
•vyrcf�r ,v rvx. vvnw ',.311'. T.xleertY:1F •r lu,qu_Af epWS��ueAgLj
l.11 Y UV KAIM,tlli UUU'ANIUiNUA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council V
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: 'William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 -
LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION
CONFI41ING THE DECISION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL HEARING OF
MAY 20, 1992 TO MODIFY AND APPROVE THE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL RELATING TO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council modify the conditions and approve
Tentative Parcel Map 13987 through the adoption of the attached
Resolution.
BACKGROUND/ANILLYSIS
On May 20, 1992, the City Council conducted a public hearing on an appeal
of the Conditions of Approval for the above referenced project. After
receiving all testimony regarding the conditions, the City Council voted
to modify the Conditions of Approval and directed staff to prepare a
Resolution. A Resolution of approval reflecting these modifications is
attached for City Council review and approval.
Respectfully submitteQ-
\v C�
.J
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BK:dlw
Attachment: Resolution of Approval
4o
RESOLUTION NO. 9J_ / (Qq
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING AND APPROVING THE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 TO
CREATE A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED
COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE
ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MAKING FINDING IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 227 - 151 -17
Recitals.
(i) Lewis Development Company has filed an application for
approval of Tentative Parcel Map 13987 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map
is referred to as "the application."
Ill) On December 17, 1991, the Planning Commission conducted a
duly noticed public hearing to receive written and oral testimony on the
proposed Application. Said public hearing was continued to January 8, 1992.
(iii) On January 8, 1992, the Planning Commission received
additional public testimony on said Application and continued said Application
for an indefinite time period.
(iv) On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application
and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No.
92 -62 thereby conditionally approving said Application.
(v) The decision represented by said Planning Commission
Resolution was timely appealed to this Council.
Resolution:
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and
correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project
has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and concurs with the issuance of the
Negative Declaration issued on April 8, 1992.
qI
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
PM 13987 - LEWIS DEV CO
June 3, 1992
Page 2
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above- referenced May 20, 1992 hearing, including written staff
reports, the minutes of the above- referenced Planning Commission meeting, and
the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -62, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue with a street
frontaae of 250 feet along Base Line Road and 174 feet along
Rochester Avenue. The parcel is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north and east are zoned for and
being developed with single - family residences. The property to the south and
west are zoned for multi - family units and are vacant; and
(c) The Application creates a single parcel of 1.31
acres; and
(d) The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution
Number 92 -62, remain to be important and necessary to the development of the
property, except for the following modifications:
(1) Engineering Condition Number 2 shall be revised
to require the construction of Rochester Avenue full width from Base Line Road
to Ironwood Avenue with a transition as determined by the City Engineer; and,
(2) Engineering Condition Number 5 shall be
deleted; and,
(3) A condition shall be added as Engineering
Condition Number 9 that the developer enter into an agreement and poet
securities to construct Rochester Avenue and the Master Planned Stomn Drain in
conformance with the Terra Vista Implementation Policies within 2 years of
occupancy of the proposed development or prior to the construction of the
traffic signal at the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Church Street,
whichever occurs first.
(e) The development as specified will not contradict the
goals or objectives of the General Plan or the Terra Vista Community Plan and
would not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the
Immediate vicinity of the subject site.
4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this
Council during the above- referenced public hearing, including written and oral
staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
(a) The application is consistent with the General Plan
and Terra Vista Community Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
Li 1-
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
PM 13987 - LEWIS DEV CO
June 3, 1992
Page 3
(b) The design or Improvements of The Application is
consistent with the General Plan and the Terra Vista Community Plan of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
(c) The proposed project is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or
their habitat; and
(d) The proposed project is not likely to cause serious
health problems; and
health problems; and (e) The proposed project is not likely to cause serious
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the Tentative
Parcel Map subject to all of the Conditions set forth to Planning Commission
Resolution No. 92 -62 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit
"A ") with the specific exceptions as follows:
(a) Engineering Conditions Number 2 to read:
Acquire necessary right of way and construct Rochester
Avenue full width from Base Line Road to Ironwood Street
including a transition of the public improvements as
determined by the City Engineer.
(b) Engineering Condition Number 5 shall be deleted;
and,
(c) A condition shall be added as Number 9 and shall
read as follows:
An agreement with appropriate securities shall be
executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
City Attorney, prior to final parcel map approval, to
guarantee the construction of street and storm drain
improvements in accordance with the Terra Vista Community
Implementation Policies within 2 years of occupancy of
the proposed development or prior to the construction of
the traffic signals at the intersection of Rochester
Avenue and Church Street, whichever occurs first.
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Lewis Development
Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented
by this Resolution must be sought 1s governed by the provisions of
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
43
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
PM 13987 - LEWIS DEY CO
June 3, 1992
Page 4
directed to: 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby
(a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to Lewis Development
Company at the address identified in City records.
Resolution. 8, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
4H
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF ...E PLANNING COMMISSION 0. -HE C17Y OF
P.A.9CHO- CUCAMONGA,v CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY` APFRCVTNG
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13987, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTSaIST CORINER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE,
AND MAKING PINOINGS IN SUPPORT Th ^cREOP - APN: 227 - 151-17
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number .3987, submitted by Lewis
Development company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 1 parcel,
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of Calitornia, identified as APH�s) 227- 151 -17, located at
the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue; and
WHEREAS, on December 11, and continued to December 17, 1991, January
9, 1992, and April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission held duly advertised
Public hearings for the above - described map.
FOLLOWS:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS
SECTION i That the following findings have boon made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or public
health problems or have adverse effects on abutting
properties.
SEC ^.ION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envirommental
Quality Act of 1970; and further, this commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Nap Number 13987 is hereby approved
subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditions:
Overhead Utilities
a. Base Line Road - An in-lieu fee as a
contribution to the previously undergrounded
Utilities (electrical and telecommunication) on
the opposite side of Base Lino shall be paid to
EXHIBIT "A"
a.;:::c::c �;n. ..
_-N.. P.A. 13957 - ,:S ✓° -v. Co.
April 8, 1392
Page 2
the city prior to issuance of building permits
or final nap approval, whichever occurs first.
It.. fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit
amount times the length from the center of
Rochester Averue to the went project boundary.
b. Rochester Avenue - An in -lieu fee as
corcribution to the future undergrounding of
existing overhead utilities (electrical and
telecommunication, except for 66 K.V.
electrical) on the opposite side of Rochester
Avenue shall be paid to the city prior to
issuance of a building permit or final map
approval, whichever occurs first. The fee shall
be one -half the City adopted unit amount times
the length from the center of Base Line Road to
the south project boundary.
Acquire necessary right -of -way and construct
Rochester Avenue full width from Base Line Road to
Church Street. offeite sidewalk and street trees
may be deferred until the development of the
adjacent properties. The developer may request a
reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of
constructing offeite street improvements from future
development as it occurs.
3. Remove and replace portion of the curb and gutter on
Base Line Road to construct a right turn lane for
the project driveway.
4. Construct a combination bus bay and right turn lane
on Rochester Avenue north of the project driveway.
5. construct the portion of the Terra Vista Community
Master Planned Storm Drain System 16 (lines 6 and
6 -1) from this site to Day creek Channel. If the
project is to be constructed prior to the completion
of the Day creek Channel, provide a retention
facility to the eatlefaction of the City Engineer.
6. The Terra Vista Community entry monument, if
constructed, shall be maintained by the developer.
Install the Bane Line Road median landscaping from
Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue.
91 Final Parcel Map lot lines shall conform to the
approved site plan.
?LP NNT NG CC�MISSI OD °. SOL'JT:ON 9G. ... -._
TEIJT. P.H. 13987 - ..d IS CEV. CO.
April 8, 1992
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1997.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
ATTEST:
SrA Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
city of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLST0Y, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA
ASSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager
BY: Sandra G. Ramirez, Resource Services Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTYWIDE GANGS & DRUGS TASK FORCE AND ITS
FISCAL AGENT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMMONGA
Staff recommends City Council's approval to execute a Memorandum of
Understanding between the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task
Force and its Fiscal Agent, San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools,
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This Memorandum of Understanding
agreement is for the use of office space at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall for the
San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force Project Assistant.
City staff has been working with the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs and
Drugs Task Force Project Supervisor exploring the possibility of providing an
office space at City Hall to be utilized by the Project Assistant, The Project
Assistant will work closely with a number of municipalities, agencies,
organizations and individuals in the West End to coordinate and facilitate anti-
gang and drug efforts within the West End communities. It is essential that an
office be maintained in the West End to encourage a proactive process of
community awareness and training. The City would provide a desk, chair and
access to phone services. Reimbursement will be made to the City for toll, long
distance and Fax telephone calls.
Respectfully submitted,
'Jerry B. Fulwood
Deputy City Manager
JBF:SR:de
Attachment y
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
between the
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE GANGS & DRUGS TASK FORCE M40 ITS
FISCAL AGENT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
and the
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Regarding the use of office space at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
for the Project Assistant from the San Bernardino Countywide
Gangs & Drugs Task Force
Whereas, the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force (hereinafter referred to as
'GDTF') has authorized the San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools
(Superintendent), to lead the Communities in Partnership for Substance Abuse to facilitate the
planning for a proactive process of community awareness, needs assessment, and training that
will empower local citizens with skills, knowledge, abilities, and identifiable resources to
initiate a coordinated effort of aggressive outreach to reduce substance abuse trends among the
youth and young adults in their communities; and
Whereas. GDTF has received a grant from the Office of Substance Abuse Prevention, and has
delegated, grant administration, including fiscal, administrative and personnel policies to the
San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, also a member of the GDTF. Through this
grant a Project Assistant will be hired to coordinate and facilitate anti -gang and drug efforts in
the communities of Rancho Cucamonga. Ontario, Upland, Chino, Montclair and Chino Hills
(referred to as "the West End "): and
Whereas, this Project Assistant will be required to work closely with a myriad of groups,
organizations and individuais in the West End, and will need to maintain an office in the West
End; and
Whereas, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "City ") will provide office
space to be used by GDTF.
The parties agree as follows
The term of this Agreement shall be for the period beginning on June 3, 1992, and
ending on June 3, 1993 , unless terminated earlier. This Agreement may be terminated
by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days written notice.
The City agrees to provide the following for the use of the Project Assistant during the
term of this Agreement:
a. Office space within City facilities
b. Desk and chair
C. Access to a trunk line for phone service
d. Access to FAX and answering service for after hours
e. An itemized cost estimate for each of the above listed unkind services provided to
GDTF
`l 9
3. GDTF agrees to provide the following for the use of the Project Assistant during the
term hereof:
Office supplies (pens, pencils, paper, incidentals)
Computer supplies (paper, labels, forms, etc.)
Reimbursement to City for toll, long distance and Fax telephone calls
4. The Project Assistant will occupy the provided office space Monday through Thursday
between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.: and Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., unless arrangements to change are approved by the City Manager.
5 The Project Assistant will adhere to policies and procedures observed by City staff, and
will maintain a respectful, positive and productive demeanor at all times.
If any City policy conflicts with GDTF or Superintendent's policy, such conflict will
be brought to the Project Supervisor and Deputy City Manager's attention.
6. The Project Supervisor, Michael Stevens, will meet monthly with Jerry B. Fulwood to
assess the arrangement and need for modification.
7. City shall defend, Indemnify and hold Superintendent, its officers, agents and
employees harmless from and against any and all liability, loss expense (including
reasonable attorneys' fees), or claims for injury or damages arising out of the
performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability,
loss, expense, attorneys' fees, or claims for injury or damages caused by a result from
the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the City's staff or employees.
8. The San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force and
Superintendent of Schools shall defend, indemnity and hold Superintendent, its
officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any and all liability, loss
expense (including reasonable attorneys' fees), or claims for injury or damages arising
out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such
liability, loss, expense, attorneys' fees, or claims for injury or damages caused by a
.result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the City's staff or
employees.
9. The San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drug: Task Force and
Superintendent of Schools shall defend, indemnify and hold the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, its officers, staff or employees harmless from and against any and all
liability, loss expense (including reasonable attorneys fees), or claims for injury or
damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and
to the extent such liability. loss, expense, attorneys' fees, or claims for injury or
damages caused by a result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of
Superintendent, its officers, agents and employees.
Sb
10.. This agreement may be amended or modified at any time by mutual written consent of
both parties. The amendments or modifications shall be signed and become part of this
agreement.
County Superintendent of Schools Representative
City of Rancho Cucamonga
51
Date
Date
RECOWENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving a Subordination Agreement requested by Shih -Chen Hsu.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the street
improvements fronting the property was approved by the City Council and
recorded on October 29, 1981.
The homewoner is currently attempting to secure refinancing for the
property. Her lender requires that this City lien be subordinated in
favor of the new loan. A similar subordination agreement for her current
loan was approved by the City Council and recorded on August 1, 1989.
Respectfully submi
William J. O'Neil L/
City Engineer
WJO:SM:jh
Attachment
CITY OF P.ANCII0 CI'CANIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 3, 1992
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM
SHIH -CHEN HSU
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10010 ALMOND STREET (APN 1074-
1
I
041 -06)
RECOWENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving a Subordination Agreement requested by Shih -Chen Hsu.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the street
improvements fronting the property was approved by the City Council and
recorded on October 29, 1981.
The homewoner is currently attempting to secure refinancing for the
property. Her lender requires that this City lien be subordinated in
favor of the new loan. A similar subordination agreement for her current
loan was approved by the City Council and recorded on August 1, 1989.
Respectfully submi
William J. O'Neil L/
City Engineer
WJO:SM:jh
Attachment
aESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION
AGREEMENT FROM SHIN -CHEN HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WN 1074 - 041 -06)
WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for
the installation of off -site improvements including curb, gutter and pavement
was approved by City Council and recorded in San Bernardino County on October
29, 1981, Instrument No. 81- 239269; and
WHEREAS, for the developer to secure refinancing for the project, the
lender requires that the above - mentioned lien agreement be subordinated to the
lien in favor of the lender; and
WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordination Agreement to
that effect for the City's approval and execution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said
same are hereby approved and the Mayor
Subordination Agreement on behalf of the
City Clerk attest thereto.
53
by the City Council of the City of
Subordination Agreement be and the
is hereby authorized to sign said
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
5 l
La
CITY OF RANCHO CLCANIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14644, LOCATED AT THE END
OF CAMELLIA COURT, NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, EAST OF BERYL
STREET, SUBMITTED BY JORGE R. GARCIA, DBA GARCIA 8
ASSSOCIATES,
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving Tract 14644, accepting the subject agreement and security,
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to
record.
Tract No. 14644, located at the end of Camellia Court, North of Hillside
Road, East of Beryl Street in the very low residential district, was
approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990, for the
division of 4.5 acres into an B custom lot subdivision.
The Developer, Jorge R. Garcia, is submitting an agreement and security
to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the
following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $85,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $42,500.00
Monumentatfon (cash deposit) 2,800.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's
Office.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TR 14644
JUNE 3, 1992
PAGE 2
Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water
District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file
in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submi,�fA d,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO: PV:jh
Attachments
SLO
RESOLUTION NO. L)j.I -7'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 14644, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14644, submitted by Jorge R. Garcia, and
consisting of 8 lots located at the end of Camellia Court, North of Hillside
Road, East of Beryl Street, was approved by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 12, 1990, and is in compliance with the
State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that
Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14644 is the final map of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval
of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry
into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by
Jorge R. Garcia as developer; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map
offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets
delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY
RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security
submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor
is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for
dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14644
is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
S�
517E
_ ,A+RARI
-_Y LLSICE RCAO
N
VICINITY MAP t
i
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
.r
Y.T.S.
TR 14644
EXHIBIT "B"
RESOLUTION NO. q - 17J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
FOR TRACT NO. 14644
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District "); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report ".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including LfieTevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
M1
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
N.T.S.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
r TR 14644
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A
EXHIBIT °8'
PROJECT NAME: TRACT 14644
NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 8 D,U. NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 8 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
PV:6/3/92
�t
No. of Lam s to
be Annexed
District No.
I---
- -- - --
- --
---
2 4
--- ---
---
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Turf
Ground Cover
Trees
District No. Street Name
Sq. ft.
Sq. ft.
Ea.
1 Camellia Court
0
0
22
PV:6/3/92
�t
U11 Y UN KA.N':IiU l;L UA.NlU�NIsA
STAFF REPORT
>r
DATE: June 3, 1992 r�
TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council 41J�
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II " T -.
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E %TENSION FOR 5782 HAVEN
AVENUE, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE SOUTH OF
HILLSIDE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF
LATTER DAY SAINTS
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for 5782 Haven Avenue were
approved by the City Council on May 2, 1991, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $17,700
Labor and Material Bond: $ 8,850
The developer, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, is requesting
approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. The
Developer has sent the project out to bid, and expects to start
construction within the next two months. Copies of the Improvement
Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Nei� 61 a 6
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:sd
Attachments
RONALD S ISHII AND ASSOCIATES architects planners
506 W. Graham Avenue, Suite 206 Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (714) 674 -7829 FAX: (714) 674 -9242
April 28, 1992
Steve Gilliland
Public Works Inspector
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'.0500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re: Improvement Extension Agreement / Project; #504 - 6254 -03, Alta Loma Institute
Project, 5782 N. Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California
Dear Steve,
We are requesting an extension to the improvements agreement that will expire on
May 1, 1992. Our solicit to bid package on this project was sent to the Owner's
representative on 26th of June 1991. On the 15th of April 1992 we received a phone call
from the Church's educational department instructing us to proceed with the project.
Apparently the approval letter for this project was misplaced or misdirected.
It is our intent to proceed with the project and we anticipate the scheduling of the pre -
bid meeting to take place within the next two weeks.
Should you need additional information please do not hesitate to contact us
Sincerely,
Ronald S. Ishii
President
RS /ec
MAYO 7 1992
cc: Frank Bradshaw
Rod Burtenshaw, area architect
Ralph Swiss, director CES physical facilities
;I r.
l0 3
RESOLUTION NO. ��,, 73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 5782 HAVEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on June 3, 1992, by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real
property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west
side of Haven Avenue south of Hillside Road; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said 5782 Haven Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
4L{
--- ('1'fS (m HAN('HO CL'CASION(;A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Jung 3, 1992
TC: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, ATOP, City Manager
FROM: 'dill jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUEJ ET; APPROVAL OF REDUCTION AND SUBSTITUTION OF SECURITIES FOR TRACT
13359, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET BETWEEN
ORCHARD STREET AND JENNET STREET, SUBMITTED BY H. K. HEIM,
INCORPORATED/ ROYAL CONSERVE CORPORATE
RECOtT1ENDATION:
The required street improvements for Tract 13359 have been substantially
completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council
approve a performance surety reduction in the amount of $59,300, release the
existing Performance and Labor Material Bonds (Bond No. 977049S) and accept a
Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Surety in the form of a
Certificate of Deposit in the amount of 8190,000.00.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Tract 13351 - located on the east side of Sapphire Street between Orchard
Street and Jennet Street.
The developer has completed the required improvements 4n an arreotable manner
except for the restoration of existing parkways and private property located
at the northeast and northwest corners of Cameo and Thoroughbred where storm
drains structures were installed; The final grading of the storm drain
easement west of Turk, south of Stork School; correction of damage to the
community trail along southern tract boundary caused by storm waters;
correction of damage to Sapphire Streei pavement caused by storm damage; and
minor cleaning, restoration and corrective work.
The developer is anxious to complete the remaining work but does not have the
required funds to do so. The surety company currently holds $190,000.00
Certificate of Deposit, as collateral for five bonds; grading, water
performance and labor and materials, and street improvement performance and
labor and materjal. The surety company and the developer have agreed to
transfer the 5190,000.00 Certificate of Deposit to the City upon release of
the five bonds. The developer has been working with Cucamonga County 'dater
District and City Building and Safety for the release of the water and grading
bonds.
�o S
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 13354
JUNE 3, 1992
PAGE 2
Once the City has control of the Certificate of Deposit, the City can release
and disburse a portion of the Certificate of Deposit funds as needed to insure
acceota'"e completion of the remaining work. The deveioper has agreed to the
City releasing the Certificate of Deposit in the form of joint checks to
insure payment of remaining work to be performed.
At this point, the City must hold a surety in the amount of $83,100.00 for
Labor and Material and a surety in the amount $16,620.00 for maintenance.
Therefore, $90,280.00 remains for performance surety ($190,000 less $83,100.00
and $16,620.00). Staff estimates the remaining work to be less than
$50,000.00, which is approximately half of the remaining Certificate of
Deposit amount available for insuring performance.
If this recommendation is approved by the City Council, staff will recommend
at a future regular Council meeting, that City Council release specific
amounts of the Certificate of Deposit to be paid jointly to the developer and
his Contractors upon acceptance of the various items of work by the City
Engineer and receipt by the City of appropriate release forms from the
Contractors. Upon completion of all work, staff will recommend acceptance of
the improvements, filing of a "Notice of Completion ", and release of remaining
Certificate of Deposit funds except for 10% Maintenance Surety and Labor and
Material Surety for which the developer has the right to post bond and receive
all remaining Certificate of Deposit funds. Staff believes the above to be
the most efficient method of insuring an expeditious resolution to this
situation and therefore is recommending City Council approval.
DEVELOPER: H. K. Heim, Incorporated /Royal Conserve Corporate
500 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1210
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Accept: Reduced Faithful Performance Certificate of Deposit $106,900.
Labor and Materials Certificate of Deposit $ 83,100.
Release: Contingent upon acceptance of Certificate of Deposit in the amount of
$190,000 to be transferred to the City by the surety company.
Faithful Performance Bond $155,200.
Labor and Materials Bond $ 83,100.
Respectfully submitted, '
i
W i111am J. O'Neil
City Engineer
0610:MP: j!;
CI17 OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
STAFF REPORT
r-
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
�-
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works inspector
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 12835, LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY
The required utility undergrounding improvements for Tract 12835 have
been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City
Council accept said improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file
a Notice of Completion. The Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and
Materials Bond were originally submitted as one, in the amount of
$100,000. Since the Subdivision Map Act requires the City to hold the
Labor and Materials Bond for a period of six months after the ac- eptance
of the improvements, it is being recommended that Council authorize the
City Clerk to hold the $100,000 bond for six months from this date of
approval and not release anything at this time.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Tract 12835 - located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow
Highway
DEVELOPER: Park Vineyard Joint Venture
22632 Golden Springs Road, Suite 270
Diamond_ Bar, CA 91765
Respectfully submitted,
C)T �-) Za
William J. O'Neio
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:sd
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 12835 - UNDERGROUNDING AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12835 -
Undergrounding have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
end
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
R016
CITY 01 RANCHO CUCAb10NC,A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ll-Jl
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II —`, k
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13304 - BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN
MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION:
The required street improvements for Tract 13304 - Base Line Road have
been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City
Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond
in the amount of $32,600, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond in the amount of $326,000.
DACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Tract 13304 - Base Line Road Improvements - located on the south side of
Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Road
Accept:
Release:
DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes
P.O. Box 670
Upland, CA 91785
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 32,600
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Nei�j
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:sd
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. � ,), I 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 13304 - BASE LINE ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13304 -
Base Line Road have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
ID
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992 n
r -�
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II `y
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR CUP 90 -40 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
JASPER STREET AND SIERRA VISTA STREET
RECOMENDATION:
The required street improvements for CUP 90 -40 have been completed in an
acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in
the amount of $32,000.00.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
CUP 90 -40 - located on the Southwest corner of Jasper Street and Sierra
Vista Street
Release:
DEVELOPER: Sierra Vista Baptist Church
7192 Jasper Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $32,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
C'ar'e
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:Iy
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR CUP 90 -an AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 90 -40 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
7�
1 �-
CITY OF RANCHO CLICANI0NGA
STAFF REPORT
�J
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, ATOP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR CUP 91 -11, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LUCAS
RANCH ROAD NORTH OF 4TH STREET
RECOMMENDATION:
The required street improvements for CUP 91 -11 have been completed in an
acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Band in
the amount of $4,360.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
CUP 91 -11 - located on the east side of Lucas Ranch Road north of 4th
Street
Release:
DEVELOPER: James d Patricia Manhire
1905 O'Malley Way
Upland, CA 91786
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $4,360
Respectfully subn{i- i`ted,
9 ze
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:sd
Attachment
-13
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR CUP 91 -11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 91 -11 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
1`1
('IT)' OF RANC110 CCC'A1I0.NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lan, AICP, City Manager
FROM: 'William J, O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
�Y.
�J
SUBJECT: SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 1, 1992 - APPROVAL OF
AMENDED PARCEL MAP NO. 11891, LOCATED GENERALLY AT THE
INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD,
SUBMITTED BY RCOC ASSOCIATED L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
setting the date for public hearing for approval of Amended Parcel Map
No. :1891 for July 1, 1992.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
The developer, RCOC Associates L.P., a California Limited Partnership,
filed an application for Development Review No. 91 -07. On December 17,
1991, the Planning Commission approved said Development Review with a
condition for an amended map to relocate the on -site inundation areas
common property lines of Parcels 22 and 23, access easements on parcels 5
and 22 and to add an access easement on Parcel 7.
The attached resolution sets the date for a public hearing to approve
Anmended Parcel Map 11891 for July 1, 1992.
Respectfully submitted;,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:4h
Attachment
-15-
RESOLUTION N0. t JV- l 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE
AMMENDED PARCEL MAP 11891 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
WHEREAS, the Amended Parcel Map No. 11891, consisting of 26 parcels,
submitted by RCDC Associated L.P., A Cal Ifornla Limited Partnership,
Subdivider, located generally at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and
Jersey Boulevard, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said
Subdivider, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California,
and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
NOW THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that notice is hereby given that on July 1,
1992, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga any and all persons having
objections to the Amended Parcel Map 11891 may appear and show cause why said
map should not record. Protests must be in writing and must contain a
description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested,
sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of
said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or
objections will be considered.
C/L ARROW ROUTE
'=L aA .� °CL 1 PCL °CL i
], •s..n
LNi b LtY W ]i1 p Llff d ]. ul �q
2
L Qi b I
C
°OL 7
I.s b
PCL •3
] S O
°CL 1
44 °',
V
P;,L 3
i
°OL 19
fa r
NI r
P L ]
].alb r1
I
/Cl 17
oCl E i
4.011 r
Y/
f41i�
PCl 14 Ip. 37
i.If 4 gall aw f0
/
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIMONGA
ENG1;"7EERING DIVISION
I
POL '.I
13.1m �
Oct 20
Lm d
WII.P
11 PCL 11
I
' I
TrI7Z- ,AMENDED PARCEL MAP 11891
EXHIBIT: --
N
NW 1 l Y • i 1 M •• Mt • 1'
N Y • Y t C'. • •,• 1 1 11 i• ' Y• Y• SY
IS 11> Y ]I 1 11 NY • 0. C I. 31
• >. •11 •' a•• I5. Y 5 ' 1 •lilt
:. I •a U •1 • •.Y 114011 1
5• N •• IY Y M I • • • >• Y5. zi 11
•> >1 ACTIVITIES AS A CCNDITICIIAILY • >•. 1 >I l
WITHIN SUBAREA SC t 1 I • >.
It
• 1 1 1• •• 5 1> OCNE)ITICHNMY V : 1 >• lY
WITHIN •Y' 7 RESPECTIVELY • I 1
11
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as
follows:
S$MCN 1: Part IV, Figure IV-9, is hereby amended as shown on the
attached Exhibit "A."
SEMON 2: Part III, Table III -1, is hereby amended to read, in words
and figures, as shown in the attached Ddhibit "B."
SECTION 3: Part IV is hereby amended to add "Automotive Service
Court" and "Specialty Building Supplies and Fiume Improvements- as conditionally
Permitted use within Subarea 7 as shown in the attached Ddnibit "C."
SECTION 4: Part III, Table III -2, Sanction D, land use type defini-
tion for "Automotive Service must" and "Specialty Building Supplies and Moue
Improvements" are hereby added to read, in words and figures, as follows:
AMUTIVE SERVICE OOIIIkf: An integrated cluster of related automotive
service activities, which typically include: gas stations; service
stations, with or without ancillary uses such as car washes and foal
marts; automotive service and repair including mufflers, shocks,
aligrcments, brakes, oil charges, lubrications, Gone -ups, Smog checks,
and tire repair and replacement; installation of air conditioning, car
phones, stereos, windshields, and upholstery; windshield tinting; sale
of auto puts; and other related services. Services typically
provided in the category "Automotive and Truck Repair - Major" are
specifically prohibited.
Auto Courts shall comply with the following design criteria:
- Mvcin m size: A aces.
- Mist be anchored by a gas or service station.
- Maximum frontage along a major or seocxdary arterial strest: 300
feet.
- No as to the site will be permitted directly off any major
arterial.
�g
Ordinance No. 496
Page 2
- Service bays and pump islands shall be screened from all major
and secondary arterials through a combination of berms, land-
scaping, low walls, and building orientation.
- An appropriate combination of berms, landscaping, and ardu-
tectural elements shall be provided around the entire perimeter
of the site to minimize the impact of the auto cast uses from
the existing and future surrounding uses.
- Outdoor storage of inoperative vehicles, parts, or eguiFamt is
prohibited.
- All work shall be conducted indoors.
- All Signage shall be limited to signs approved under a Uniform
Sign Program.
CPECLUTY BDILDM SUPPLIES AND FINE ? 15i Activities
typically include, but are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales
and installation of specialty items, such as paint, wall /floor/window
coverings, doers and windows, building materials, hardware, phm*aM
and electrical Supplies, bath and kitcdhe: fixtures and sumlies,
lighting, miming pools and supplies, and garden furnishings,
materials and supplies. Activities shall be conducted in enclosed
buildings of 25,000 sguare feet r less. Dimes excluded from this
category are general merchandise sues.
SBCPIQJ 5: This Council finds that this amerdnent will not adversely
effect the environment and thereby issues a Negative Declaration.
SUVIE M 6: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared
invalid by any final court action in a oast of eropetett jurisdiction, or by
reasm of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, para-
graphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance Shall amain in full force and
effect.
SdMON 7: The Mayes shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cleric
shall muse the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least
are in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of ganharal circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPPFD this 3rd day of Jim, 1992.
AYES: Alexander, Buguet, Stout, Williams, Wright
ABSENT: Nos
Iq
ordinance No. 496
Page 3
Dernhis L. StoUt, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBPA J. ARMS, C N CEMf K of the City of Rancho Q=m ga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance vas introdLxmd at a
regular meeting of the CmwrII of the City of Rance 01camonga held on the 20th
day of May, 1992, and vas finally passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Ctramo ga held on the 3rd day of June, 1992.
MWa ted this 4th day of June, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adaus, City Clerk
0
FIG. ry -t
SUBAREA 7
t
3
V
a
.a Y
O
H
a
at S i
CMCM111M mtl _ MMaL
aw &O.r. ........ PaMrar . C a 11 Cara.r IYe MaYrl
a� IM&S.r. ease MM6 arq.
.� K r aw 10.r.. �a Y �� Harr tbrrl rrr
aeeer aw.
� YwaCe _
...... aYloeeea :__._. M�Ma drier o dam wua' z
r.r twat tia r r arlYeaYar re Oe•a r wre.raaaa raY. A phi
'Ir rw wr w_r. r ar.rl4 awe r r.ae art re aae.oa�
ae4Mea M Ire r Ir C'm 0--W a s eYe re Y M
Ordinance No. 496
Page 5
TALE SUMMARY OF LAND B SEI�TYPE
• PERMITTED
BY SUBAREA
USE
+ CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE
NOTE: Mon -m,kac Us** Not P•rmgl,q
USE TYPES
Land Us IP GI GI GI GI GI
Sman•s MO
IP Ir 01 • GI 01 Ip 01 GI MI •P iI
MANUFACTURING
f I ] s 3
6 1 8 • .0 �� t31J �. '5 ':e t)
Caetam
L:anl
..V • • 1 •
• •
• • • lJ • • I • Lt/ P �J
e •
MHis,
"a'"Non -04e1 Mae"
BI } ! }J
1 Urals I I I
Iasi. + No • fa rq
` — :.
Plafaa,en41 /04,911 Servlee•
LI•Irt
wwt
Amnlal Con
Aete•wor• FI••t {14•••
Awemotly R•l"I'L••am•
M= wn•ar• iusm Trial R••Y.YIoo,
Aetam•Ily /Tr,,k RRP•a -M•Iw
Ault r e" same
Autonotive Service Court
A•tweetlr• SwrM:e Stollen
eWl•M{ CanVeetar'• Storages Yere
•alb{ Y•ht••we• 9- so••
{I" s, { Lpntbe Isuft -• it lrwWee A {•h
waftwo wN► now A M,•w •
suaawee Lmewl S4,eee
Cerww•R SOM Sealer as
Can•l.•nce S•1•• A E,
•rp• +
Enntt•rusooM•rR btee{l11•t•r� 4
[Af+rsolre arwa•1 t.wrww•y
Feet Fee• "a• +
FnrwteMA •wre'4M• a said add, ow "',
Foe• A {•rw•N $•aee t
assigned A Cl MRw, {f•f•N
Hasty E•Me1M1R &,M• A MM"
N~y
Laun•rl Sw,eN
PM•we•ypyrt r w• {wry •
Reran••
h proorts tlwy
R•or•••preM food w 4
Rarer {w7Y•e
Scrap OtMM••t1eR
oma Inv,. � arm' •:
r!1•I•'�•�•1�rI9 h' -!•Ia o4 4i�•
CMRwal • t +h` . • `101. - A
lowlel•• Mweet Utwq p••4eee ,+ ♦�
Flo" cortbovurwy Cw,•w • • • • • • • • • � . � L
>tiuAwwrrrp i ♦ ♦ t i�4I�l +m+ C
Fantle safety A Ulllnl SerYmee + 1 ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + + 4 +' ♦ + ♦ + ♦ ♦ t
POSOI�� Allow"
• U- Ineygltel /b1l eldr•nN•1 In•WVbI YI /MWInImIRn Image% M•lar
MO-M•vn Ave. overlay District NFM••p ln•e,rl Al
Bin
•
♦
,
_
•
}
r•
♦
+
I
4 4
+
•
I
•
•
�
•
_,
+
f
�
+
4
If
It�
♦
+
+I
4
4
:
♦
4i
41 1
♦
i
♦
f
•
s
•
•
+
+'le
•I•�
i
•I
+
♦
•
f
+I+
41I♦
♦
♦
fl
••t4+
} ♦1I
+ 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
4
4
♦
4
+I +
++,
♦
t
i
t
♦
4
♦
+�y�-�+
1
'I
•
•
♦
•
1
-
+�
i
i
4
t
+
+
♦
�+
I
t
t
♦
♦
♦
+L�
+t
+IfI
•
paso
•
1. 1
CMRwal • t +h` . • `101. - A
lowlel•• Mweet Utwq p••4eee ,+ ♦�
Flo" cortbovurwy Cw,•w • • • • • • • • • � . � L
>tiuAwwrrrp i ♦ ♦ t i�4I�l +m+ C
Fantle safety A Ulllnl SerYmee + 1 ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + + 4 +' ♦ + ♦ + ♦ ♦ t
POSOI�� Allow"
• U- Ineygltel /b1l eldr•nN•1 In•WVbI YI /MWInImIRn Image% M•lar
MO-M•vn Ave. overlay District NFM••p ln•e,rl Al
OMinanoe No. 496
Page 6
SUBAREA 7
Land Use Designation Industrial Park
Primary Function Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill
Boulevard which represents an important land use edge
between the City's Industrial Area and community
oriented non - industrial area and is a gateway to the
City, A mW or industrial, office, and commercial
development on approximately 300 acres is currently
undergoing phased construction, Within this area is a
planned Civic Center which will include San Bernardino
County and City offices.
Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing
Light Manufacturing
Administrative and Office
Professional /Design Services
Research Services
Light Wholesale, Storage, Distribution
Building Maintenance Services
Business Supply Retail Sales and Services
Business Support Services
Communication Services
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services
Motel /Motel
Administrative Civic Services
Flood Control /Utility Corridor
Conditional Uses Automotive Rental /Leasing
Automotive sales
Automotive service station
Cdnvenience Sales and Services
Entertainment
Fast Food Sales
Food and leverage Sales
Medical /health Care Services
Personal services
Recreation Facilities
Cultural
Public Assembly
Public Safety and Utility Services
Automotive Religious Assembly Service court]
Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements
1✓XHlblfi `G `
(Y-48
a1M171AIKE ND. 498
1.'J t I• Y 1 1 i• • 11 • i ,1
M • M •.'. • 11 1 ) • I • 5• 1 • • 1
• Y • Y• •. YI• • ••t • 54V• t t '• 5
/• 5•.IL D •'• •l t•
The City Council of the City of Rands Cucancrga does hereby ordain
as follows:
0=0N 1: A new Chapter 6.04 hereby is added to title 6 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade to react, in coals and figures, as follows:
"Potentially Dangerous and /or Vicious Dogs
I'Sec.-ticm:
"6.04.010 I
Intent
"6.04.020 D
Definitions
"6.04.030 N
No Applicability of Qtapter
"6.04.040 I
Initiation of Hearing to Determine Dog as Potentially
Dargerous or Vicious
"6.04.050 S
Seizure aryl nVotinctlient pe ALng Hearing
"6.04.060 N
Notice of Hearing
"6.04.070 H
Hearing Procedure; Evidence; Standard of Proof
116.04.080 F
Failure to Appear
16.04.090 n
n tern;.ution; Findings; Orders
116.04.100 N
Notice and Service of Orders
116.04.110 C
Cir'ainstanoes Urder Mich Dogs May Not Be Declared
Potentially Danqerc. s or Vicious
"6.04.120 C
Conditional Release of Potentially Dangerous or Vicious
Dog
116.04.130 R
Registration aid Fees
"6.04.140 D
Death, Sale, 'Transfer or Pernarment Removal; Notice
"6.04.150 R
Relocation Within City
"6.04.160 R
Removal from List of Potentially rnngerrous Dogs
116.04.170 D
Destruction, Remval from City or CRdi.tim Release of
Vicious Dogs
116.04.180 P
Prohibition from Owning or Keeping Dogs
16.04.190 S
Severability
116.04.200 P
Penalties for Violation of Chapter
116.04.210 C
Civil. Remedies Available
This Chapter is enacted n„'�unt to the
authority of Article 11, Section 7 of the Constitution of the State of
California and California Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683 and is
intended to provide effective regulations and controls pertaining to Dangerous
and /or vicious dogs within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to ensure prcupt
and adequate procedural medranisas to control the threat of Dangerous and /or
vicious dogs to the health, safety and welfare of the cammity.
mm
Ordinance No. 498
Page 2
"6.04. 20 DefinitittLS.
"A. 'Animal control Department, shall mean that entity designated by
the City ce uucil for pouposas of animal licensing, rare, control, and
regulation and shall inel'ade any public or private agency providing animal
control services pursuant to contract or statute.
„B. 'City' means the City of Panda Cucamonga and shall include all
territory within the incorporated limits of the City whether now PXistitg or
as incorporated within or annexed thereto from time to time.
^C. 'F]hclosu re' means a fence or structure suitable to prevent the
entry of young children, and which is suitable to confine a vicious dog in
conjunction with other measures which may be taken by the owner or keeper of
the dog. The enclosure shall be designed so as to prevent the animal from
escaping. The animal shall be horsed pursuant to Section 597t of the
California Penal Code as the same may be amended form time to time.
„D. 'Hearing officer' means the City Marmger of City or his or her
designee.
'E. 'Impounded' meatus taken uto the custody of the Animal Control
Department.
„y. 'Potentially Dangerous Dag' means any of the following:
^(i) Are dog which, when unprovoked, on two separate occasions
within the prior thirty -six (36) month period, engages in any behavior that
requires defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the
person and the dog are off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog.
1, (ii) Any dog which, when npravoked, bites a person causing a
less severe injury than as defined in Section 6.04.020H.
„( iii) Airy dog which, when unprovoked, on two separate
oecasio>s within the prior thirty -six (36) month period has killed, seriously
bitten, inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury to a domestic animal off
the property of the owner or keeper of the dog.
„c. 'Severe Injury' means any physical injury to a human being that
results in muscle tears or disfiguring lacerations or, reg irs,.e multiple
sutures or corrective or cosmetic surgery.
„H. 'Vicious Dog' means any of the following:
„(i) Any dog seized under Section 599aa of the California Penal
Cede as the ram may be amended from time to time, and upon the sustaining of
a conviction of the caner or keeper order subdivision (a) of Section 597.5 of
the C�difoxnia Penal Code, as the same may be amended from time to time.
^(ii) Any dog which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner,
inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being.
Cr
Ordinance No. 498
Page 3
"( iii) Airy dog previously determined to be and currently listed
as a potentially D,irrjercus deg which, after its owner or keeper has been
notified of such determination, continues or repeats the behavior described in
Section 6.04.020F, inflicts severe injury on a human being or is maintained in
violation of this Chapter or in violation of airy crder(s) imposed after a
hearing and determination pursuant to this Chapter.
"6.04.030 NM Applicability of Canter. The provisions of this
chapter shall not apply to arty dog utilized by any law enforcement department
or arty law enforcement officer in the performance of police nark.
"6.04.040 Initiation of Hearing to Determine Dog as Potential)
Da or Vicious. If any animal control officer or arry law enforcement
officer determines that there exists reasonable muse to believe that a dog is
potentially dangerous or vicious, the chief officer of the Animal Control
Department, or his or her designee, or the head of the local law enforoemnt
agency, or his or her designee, shall petition the hearing officer for a
hearing for the pffposes of determining whether or not the dog in question
should be declared potentially Dangerous or vicious. SOhenever possible, any
complaint received from a member of the public which serves as the evidentiary
basis for the animal control officer or law enforcement officer to find
reasonable cause shall be sw urn to and verified by the complainant and shall
be attached to the petition.
"A. If upon investigation it is determined by the animal control
officer or law enforcement officer that reasonable cause exists to believe the
dog in question poses an immediate threat to public safety, then the animal
control officer or law enforcement officer may seize and impound the dog
pending any hearing to be held pursuant to this Chapter. The owner or keeper
of the dog shall be liable to the City for the oasts and expenses of keeping
the dog, if the dog is later determined to be potentially Dangerous or
vicious.
"H. Whenever a dog has been impounded pursuant to subdivision A.
and it is not contrary to public safety, the chief animal mhrtrvl officer
shall permit the animal to be confined, at the owner's or keeper's expense, in
a kennel or veterinary facility approved by the Animal control Department.
"6.04.060 Notice of HearirxJ. Dtenever a petition for the
determination that a dog is potentially Dangerous or vicious has been filer]
with the hearing officer, the chief officer of the Animal Control Department
shall notify the owner or keeper of the dog that a hearing will be held before
the hearing officer at which time the owner or keeper may present evidence as
to why the dog should not be declared potentially D or vicious. The
owner or keeper of the dog shall be served with notice of the hearing and a
copy of the petition, either personally or by first class mail, return receipt
requested. The notice of hearing shall specify the date, time and place of
the hearing to be owxhsted before the hearing officer and shall advise the
owner or keeper of the dog of that person's opportunity to personally appear,
or be represented by counsel, and to present evidence in opposition to the
petition. The hearing shall be held not less than five (5) working days nor
more than ten (10) working days after service of the notice of hearing upon
the owner or keeper of the dog. V
Ordinance No. 498
Page 4
"6.04.070 Hearin Procedure; Evidence; Standard of Proof. The
hearing on the petition to determine if a dog is potentially Dangerous or
vicious before the hearing officer shall be open to the public. The hearing
officer may admit into evidence all relevant evidence, including incident
reports and the affidavits of witnesses. in determining whether a dog is or
is not potentially Dargercu or vicious, evidence of the following shall be
considered at said hearing:
"A. Any previous history of the dog attacking, biting or causing
injury to a human being or other animal;
"B. The nature and extent of injuries inflicted and the nualer of
victim involved;
"C. The place where the bite, attack or injury occurred;
"D. The Presence * or absence of any provocation for the bite, attack
or injury;
"E. 'The extent to which property has been damaged or destroyed;
"F. %hether the dog exhibits any characteristics of being trained
for fighting or attack and other evidence tending to show such training;
"G. 4Enether the dog exhibits characteristics of aggressive or
unpredictable teWerament or behavior in the presence of human beings or other
domestic animals.
'T3. Riether the dog can be effectively trained or retrained to
change its tarherament or behavior;
"I. The manner in which the dog has been maintained by its owner or
keeper.
"J. Any other relevant evidence wnoerning the maintenance of the
dog by the owner or keeper.
"K. Any other relevant evidence regarding the ability of the owner
or keeper of the dog to prevent injuries to the public if the dog is permitted
to remain in the custody of uhe Owner or keeper of the dog.
"The hearing officer may find, upon a preponderance of the evidence,
that the dog is potentially Dangerous or vicious and make such orders as are
authorized by this Chapter.
116_04.080 Failure to Appeal•. The hearing officer may decide all
issues for or against the owner or keeper of the dog even if the owner or
keeper fails to appear at the hearing.
116.04.090 Determination: Findings; Orders. Basel upon the evidence
presented at the hearing, the hearing officer shall determine whether the dog
should be classified as potentially Dangerous or vicious. The hearing officer
shall make such findings as are necessary to support the determination as to
whether the dog is potentially Dangerous or vicious and may make such orders
(�I
Ordinance No. 498
Page 5
as are deemed reasonably naaessary, in accordance with the provisions of this
Chapter, pertaining to the release, conditional release, xe al frr the City
or other disposition of the dog.
116.04.100 Notice and Service of Orders.
"A. At the conclusion of the hearing wrffimtsd pursuant to Section
6.04. 070, the owner or keeper of the dog shall be notified, in writing, of the
determination, findings and orders issued by the hearing officer, either
perscrally or by first class mail, postage prepaid. If a determination is
made that the dog is potent' lly Dangerous or vicious, the owner or keeper
shall comply with all conditions and orders of the hearing officer in
accordance with the time schedule established by the hearing officer. No dog
farad to be potentially Daroercus or vicious shall be released to the owner or
keeper thereof until and unless the Animal Control Department shall file with
the hearing officer a determination that all of the terms and conditions of
the order of release have been or will be complied with in a reasonable time.
"B. If the owner or keeper of the dog contests the determination
and /or orders of the hearing officer, he or she may, within five (5) days of
the receipt of the notice of determination, appeal the decision of the hearing
officer to the Municipal Cant in accordance with the provisions of California
Flood and Agriculture CUde Section 31622. Otherwise, the decision of the
hearing officer shall be final.
116.04.110 Ci=]Mstances Onder uhlch Doan May Not Be Dec
Potentially Dangerous or yigicuD.
"A. If, upon the conclusion of the presentation of the evidence at
the hearing, the hearing officer determines that any of the following is true,
then the hearing officer shall not declare the dog potentially dangerous or
Vicious:
"(1) If any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at
the time of the injury or damage was sustained, was committing a willful
trespass or other tot upon the premises occupied by the owner or of
the dog or was c neittirg or attaipting to omit a crime upon the premises:
11(iil If any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at
the time the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing, tormenting, abusing
or assaulting the dog;
"(iii) If the dog, at the time any injury or damage was
sustained, was protecting or defending a person within the invediate vicinity
of the dog from an attach, assault, battery, crime or attempt to commit an
attack, assault, battery or crime; or
"(iv) If any injury or damage was sustained by a domestic
animal which , at the time the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing,
tormenting, abusing or assaulting the dog.
'OB. No dog may be declared potentially dangerous or vicious if the
injury or damage to a darvestic animal was sustained while the dog was corking
as a hunting dog, herding dog, or predator control dog on the property of, or
under the control of, its owner or keeper, and the damage or injury was to a
6rtlinW)oe Nat 498
page 6
"6.04.12 G corditiwal Release o FFbtentiallV DaruPSO3s or Vicious
P29-
"If, at the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing offices determines
that the dog in question is a potentially dangerous dog, the hearing officer
shall order release of the dog to the owner or keeper of the dog conditioned
upon the owner or keeper of the dog agreeing to any ar all of the following
requirements as the Haring officer deems reasonably necessary to prevent any
risk to public safety:
"A. Mile on the property of the owner or keeper, the potentially
daraperous; dog shall, at all times, be kept indoors, or in an enclooure
approved by the Animal Control Department.
"B. At all times when the potentially Dangerous dog is riot on the
Premises of the owner or keeper, the animal shall be securely muzzled and
restrained by a substantial leash, of appropriate length, and Hander the
control of a person eighteen (18) years of age or older, who is physically
capable of restraining the dog.
"C. The owner or keeper of the dog shall provide and maintain
financial responsibility for injuries to the public by obtaining and Wining
proof of liability insurance in a form and amount deemed acceptable by the
hearing officer in light of all the ciramstan oes.
"D. 'IDs Owner or keeper of the dog shall display, in a prominent
place upon the premises wherein the dog is kept or maintained, a sign easily
readable by the public using the words "BEWARE CF DW- in letters at least
three (3) Indies in height.
"E. 'IIhe hearing officer may impose any other requirements deemed
reasonably necessary to prevent injuries to the public.
'F. If, at arry time after a potentially dangerous or vicious cog has
been conditiaally released to the owner or keeper, the owns' or keeper
thereof fails to comply with each and every condition imposed thereon, the
Animal Control Department stall seize and dmpound the dog in question,
petition the hearing officer to caduct a hearing pursuant to the provisions
of this Chapter and order the removal or destruction of the dog, or sudi other
order or determination as the hearing officer finds appropriate. Any order(s)
made by the hearing officer hereunder shall be final, subject to appeal
pursuant to the provisions of section 6.04.100, above.
"6..4.170 Registration and Fees. Any dog determined to be a
potentially Dangerous or vicious dog shall be properly licensed and
vaccinated. The Animal Cntrol Department stall include the designation of
'potentially dangerous dog' or 'vicious', as the case may be, in the
registration records of the dog in question, either after the owner or keeper
of the dog has agreed to the designation or after the determination by the
hearing officer that such designation applies to the dog in question. The
Animal Control Dextrtzent may charge a reasonable fee as determined by the
city Council in addition to the regular licensing fee to provide for the
in>¢eiised costs of maintaining the rarnt3s of any potentially dangerous or
vicious dog. Ur
v^rdir» NO. 498
Page 7
"6.04.140 Death. Sale. 'Transfer or s2.,ea,.e..r Remval: Notice. If a
dog determiner) to be a potentially dangerous or vicious dog dies, or is sold,
transferred or permanently removed from the City, the owner ar keeper of such
Potentially dangerous or vicious dog shall notify the Animal Control
Department of the charged condition and new location of the dog, in writing,
within two (2) wanking days of the dwrFed condition in question.
116.04.150 FeIQQQticn within city. No owner or keeper of a
potentially dangerous or vicious dog shall transfer w remove the animal from
the premises to any other premises within the City (emept solely far
veterinary care) without first notifying the Animal Control DeFarbwnt, in
writing, at least five (5) working days prior thereto and shall permit the
Animal Control Department to investigate and certify as to the adequacy of any
enclesrre ar any other control medwlisw for the animal at the new premises
within the city.
"6.04.160 Removal from List of Potentially pzxxxous _. If
these are W
additional incidents of any of the types of behavior described in
Section 6.04.020.F. of this chapter within a thirty-six (36) month period from
the date of designation as a potentially dangerous dog, the dog shall be
removed from the list of potentially dargerams dogs. The dog may, but is not
required to be, removed from the list of potentially dangerous dogs prior to
the expiratim of such thirty -six (36) month period if the owner ar keeper
demonstrates to the Animal Control I7epartmment that charges in circumstance or
measles taken by the Owner or keeper, such as training of the dog, have
mitigated the risk to the public safety.
"6.04.170 Destruction. PRncval from City or Conditional Wlease of
vicious Dons.
"A. If at the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer
determines that a dog is a vicious dal, the tearing officer may order the saw
to be destroyed by the Animal Control Department if the hearing officer finds,
at the conclusion of the hearing, that the release of the dog would create a
significant threat to the public health, safety and welfare or that the
release of the dog to the owner or keeper would clearly constitute a danger to
hinan beings or domestic animals.
"B. If the hearing officer determines, at the conclusion of the
hearing that a vicious dog nay be returned to its owner and not destroyed, the
hearing officer may hqp se such conditions upon the wrership or keeping of
the dog, including, but not limited to, the conditions set forth in sections
6.04.120 through 6.04.150, irrlusive, of this Chapter in order to protect the
public health, safety and welfare.
I.C. Any dog determined to be vicious and conditionally released
Pursuant to this Chapter shall permanently be placed an the list of vicious
dogs.
"6.04.180 Fr ibitim from Nnim or Kewina Does, The carer or
keeper of any dog determined to be a vicious dog by the hearing officer, may
be prohibited by the officer from awning, possessing, controlling or having
custody of any dog far a period of up to three (3) years if the tearing
officer finds, at the conclusion of the hearing, that ownership or possession
of a dog by that person would create a significant threat to the public
9 b
Ordinance No. 498
Page 8
^6.04.190 Severability. 7 he City Council declares that, should any
Provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of thus Chapter be rex kme or
declared invalid by any final cast action in a court of competent jo isdio-
tion, or by reason of any preeuptive legislative, the remaining provisions
paracga;1m, sentences and lords of this chapter shall r®in in full
sections,
force and effect.
^6.04.200 BMAWx far +� . It shal unlawful
be lawful
for Vio ;ph � any person, firm, partnership, ar corporation to violate any provision or
to fail to c mply with any of the raprtr+eRmts of this Quapter. Any person,
firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provisions of this Chapter or
failing to cxnply with any of its roegUirmen.tc shall be deed guilty of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not
exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by iWrism ent not e=sedinrg
six (6) months, or by both such fine and iugriscrment. Each and every person,
firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense
for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of
any of the provisions of this Chapter is o®itted, continued or permitted by
such person, firm, partnership or ration, and shall be deemed punishable
therefor as provided in this Chapter.
"6.04.210 Civil Emx es Ava-lable. Tha violation of any of the
Provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and my be abated by
the City thrwgh civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or
pen'""rmt injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement
of such nuisances."
SELMCN 2: 'Due Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in the Inlay yallaV Daii1V Ekjlletin, a newspaper of
generall circulation publisher) in the city of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the city of Rancho Oxamonga, California.
9j
C71)MOCE NO. 307B
• 1 Y• I •,1 la I. 1 • M1 a' ♦• l 1
• 1 • V• • YI• ••. •aYV1 I • 1
a 1•,V ' la V' n n a la •1 I •� • • • a m 11
b I: Yp IY • 1 I a•. v • D • I•
••1I to I• 1 a • • •1 :•• 1 ml
Taal I 11 •• M■ :U 1 a
NOW, 'IIB'REEOIE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Clrcamonga does
hereby ordain as follows:
6FX' W 1: Chapter 2.28 of the Ranctho CAcanonga Mumhicipal Code
hereby is amended to read as follows:
2.28.010
Created
2.28.020
Role of Commission
2.28.030
Membership - Generally
2.28.040
Membership - Terms of Appointment
2.28.050
Membership - RMMV l of Members
2.28.060
Regular Meetings
2.28.070
Officers
2.28.010 Cam. There is and shall retain in the City
government a Citizens Environmental Management emission (hereinafter
"CEW") , a body replacing the Citizens Advisory Commission which hereby is
dissolved.
2.28.020 Role of OwnisQion. 'the CEMC shall act in an advisory
capacity to the City Council and planning mission on environmental issues.
2.28.030 MmbnmhW - Generally. The CFMC shall consist of a
total of five (5) members. Members of the CEMC shall be residents of Rancho
nraMonga and shall be appointed by the City Camcil. A subc®ittee of the
City Council shall sutmit to the City Council the name of any person proposed
for appointment to the CEW and iWon much appointment by the City Council, the
rhame of the appointee shall be recorded in the minures of the City Council
meetings.
2,28.04 Membership - Rlerms of Anbointment. 'the five (5)
meters of the CEMC initially appointed shall determine the length of their
terms by lot. Three (3) members shall serve a term of far (4) years and
shall continue in office until their respective terms expire unless sooner
removed as provided in this ordinance, and their su»oessors shall he appointed
for terms of fan- (4) years. 'TWO (2) members shall serve for a term of two
q2
ordinance No. 307B
Page 2
(2) years and shall cmtine in office until heir respective terms expire
unless soarer roved as provided in this ordinance, and their successes
shall be appointed for t8rme of four (4) years. If a vacancy shall occur,
other than hY expiration of the term of office, it shall be filled by
appointment of the City council for the unexpired term.
2.28.0 Membership - R®oval of MeimYbecs. Any member of the
CEM may be removed at any time by a majority vote of the entire City cc ncil.
2.28.060 Facm_ar w.,n- ;.,nz. Regular meetings of the CEDE shall
be established by resolution of the CEW.
2.28.070 Off c,£g. 4he C EPE shall select a chairperson to
preside at all meetings of the CENC, and a vice chairperson to preside in the
absence of the chairperson. 'Due secretary to the CF2C shall be designated by
the City Manager.
Sa=OR 2• The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this
Ordinance.
SE7LTIQl 3: 'Die Mayor stall sign this Oedirwma and the City Cleric
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least Once in the Tn1aM V 11eV �i1V Bullets , a of
general circulation published in ttr City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cuaano ga, California.
43
APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 - U.S. HOME
CORPORATION - An appeal to Planning Commission's decision
denying the proposed tentative tract map and design review
of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the
Etiwanda Specific_ Plan in the Low Medium Residential
District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located on the
east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of the Devore Freeway
and west of East Avenue - APN: 1100- 041 -09, 1100 - 081 -02,
1100- 171 -01 and 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 and 02, 1100-
191-01. Related File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
89 -03. (Continued from April 1, 1992.)
RECONffiiDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive any
further public testimony relative to the above- referenced project. If
after receiving input on the project, the Council determines that a
further continuance is appropriate, then the project should be continued
to a date specified at the Council's discretion. If the 60 -day request
is acceptable, then this item should be continued to August 5, 1992.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this public hearing is to consider whether a
further continuance of these projects would be acceptable to the
Council. The applicant is requesting that these items be continued an
additional 60 days to allow the development team to process modified
subdivision layouts with input from the Planning Commissioners prior to
further Council review.
a_ACAGRDOND: These items were continued from the April 1 to the June 3,
1992 City Council meeting to allow Lhe applicant the opportunity to
redesign the subdivision map to meet the goals and objectives of the
Etiwanda Specific Plan, while providing the reduced minimum average lot
size of 6,500 square feet, as requested by the related Etiwanda specific
Plan Amendment. The original intent of this continuance was to receive
LA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
.a
DATE-
June 3, 1992
`!!
.O:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
APPEAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03 - U.S.
HOME CORPORATION - Appeal to Planning Commission's
decision recommending denial of the request
to amend
certain development standards within the Etiwanda
Specific
Plan.
APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 - U.S. HOME
CORPORATION - An appeal to Planning Commission's decision
denying the proposed tentative tract map and design review
of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the
Etiwanda Specific_ Plan in the Low Medium Residential
District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located on the
east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of the Devore Freeway
and west of East Avenue - APN: 1100- 041 -09, 1100 - 081 -02,
1100- 171 -01 and 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 and 02, 1100-
191-01. Related File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
89 -03. (Continued from April 1, 1992.)
RECONffiiDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive any
further public testimony relative to the above- referenced project. If
after receiving input on the project, the Council determines that a
further continuance is appropriate, then the project should be continued
to a date specified at the Council's discretion. If the 60 -day request
is acceptable, then this item should be continued to August 5, 1992.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this public hearing is to consider whether a
further continuance of these projects would be acceptable to the
Council. The applicant is requesting that these items be continued an
additional 60 days to allow the development team to process modified
subdivision layouts with input from the Planning Commissioners prior to
further Council review.
a_ACAGRDOND: These items were continued from the April 1 to the June 3,
1992 City Council meeting to allow Lhe applicant the opportunity to
redesign the subdivision map to meet the goals and objectives of the
Etiwanda Specific Plan, while providing the reduced minimum average lot
size of 6,500 square feet, as requested by the related Etiwanda specific
Plan Amendment. The original intent of this continuance was to receive
LA
CITY COLMC71, :+'GAFF REPORT
VTT 13211 6 ESPA 89 -03 - U.S. HOMES
June 3, 1992
Page 2
comments from the Planning Commission which would be forwarded to the
City Council for further consideration of the vesting Tentative Tract
Map and related Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment.
Since the April 1, 1992 City Council meeting, staff has encouraged the
applicant to submit, as soon as possible, any new alternatives for our
consideration. Staff did most with the applicant on April 18, 1992 and
discussed an agreeable schedule that would have made it possible for the
Council to review alternatives on June 3, 1992. As of the writing of
this report, no revised subdivision layouts have been received fro. the
applicant.
Aesp ly su ..d,
Brad ller
i Cit�....ncer
BB: SH:mlq
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
`1 J
uo: rn�
„Ne o
V NE�nW
ncf
_ •Ait .0
wn•[ aerr.
.fir. 11.11 A
.eP.
�w pnrlp.. o,
Reid & Hellyer
• .Oei Ord Cf .ON IJOD N
8IV88FII]6. CAliIOlLV•IA B'dp021'100
- :c.N aHE vin eee.l. >I
. c.xx o.�[n vl.l ea ex Nye
e'e s2wo<+
J[9 A. P,J 4E[n„�HOS
May 13, 1992
Mr. Steve Hayes, Assistant City Planner
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
eeec _ouo� rnai, rn �H co.
eDD F .P90W ✓[.:C LV[FU[
9.H e[PV..OIN 4. O� pY.O�
v.I ee•wo. ee.eJea
7L _[rr[eceH ev.NOc
- .[c m +. c. ¢reeo
iaa eie.LE.
:e HuMeiN
U 61-001
Re: U.S. Homes Tentative Tract 14211 and Specific Plan Amendment
Dear Steve:
The purpose of this letter is to request a continuance of the
hearing on Tract 14211 for 60 days. This matter is presently set for
hearing on May 27, 1992. It is my understanding that this matter is
also set for hearing by the City Council on June 3, 1992. we would
request the matter be continued for at least 90 days so that we may
have the hearing by the Council following the hearing of the Planning
Commission. U.S. Homes waives any of the deadlines set forth under the
Permit Streamlining Act.
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.
CITY OF F� /-�v
it�l`C"'d4UCAMONGA
PLANNING- DI17I,SION
Sincerely,
RHID i NKLLYSR
A P SS5 ALJ_�D TI
C s llot�lu� l
4(P /
DIME
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVMOP ?SEAT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR PROGRAM
YEAR 1992 -93 AND AMENDMENT TO THE 1989 -90 AND 1990 -91
FINAL STATEMENTS FOR REPR'JGRAM.MINS OF FUNDS - The adoption
of the Final Sta to msrt o' Commrtmity Development Objectives
for program year 1992 -93 and the. final selection of
projects based on a Brant of $551,000 and 513,260 in
program income, and related amendments to the 1989 -90 and
1990 -91 Final Statements to allow reprogramming of funds.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take tl,e following actions:
1. Receive for discussion and public input, the Final Statement of
community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds
(Final Statement) for the Community Development Block Grant
(CUBS) program year 1992 -93; and
2. Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Final Statement
making ail findings, determinations, certifications, and
adopting all policies therein authorizing the Mayor to submit
the Final Statement, and any amendments thereto, and to act in
connection with the submission of the Final Statement and to
provide such additional information as may be required; and
3. Approve, by minute action, the reprogramming of $2,561 in funds
from the 1989 -90 and 1990 -91 program years to be allocated to
the House of Ruth, a public service activity which is receiving
funding in the 1992 -93 program year, as well as a reprogramming
of approximately $17,750 in prior year funds toward grant
administration.
ABSTRACT
The Citizen's Participation Plan provides that the City Council hold an
advertised public hearing prior to approving the Final Statement for the
CDBG program year 1992 -93. Notice of the public hearing was published
in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper one month prior to the
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DA ^E:
dune
3, 1992
u-
T'):
Mayor
and Members of the ,i ay Co'uncii
daoi;
Lam, AICP, City manager
FROM:
Brad
Boller, City Planner
BY:
Cindy
Norris, Associate Planner /'CDBG Coordinator
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVMOP ?SEAT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR PROGRAM
YEAR 1992 -93 AND AMENDMENT TO THE 1989 -90 AND 1990 -91
FINAL STATEMENTS FOR REPR'JGRAM.MINS OF FUNDS - The adoption
of the Final Sta to msrt o' Commrtmity Development Objectives
for program year 1992 -93 and the. final selection of
projects based on a Brant of $551,000 and 513,260 in
program income, and related amendments to the 1989 -90 and
1990 -91 Final Statements to allow reprogramming of funds.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take tl,e following actions:
1. Receive for discussion and public input, the Final Statement of
community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds
(Final Statement) for the Community Development Block Grant
(CUBS) program year 1992 -93; and
2. Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Final Statement
making ail findings, determinations, certifications, and
adopting all policies therein authorizing the Mayor to submit
the Final Statement, and any amendments thereto, and to act in
connection with the submission of the Final Statement and to
provide such additional information as may be required; and
3. Approve, by minute action, the reprogramming of $2,561 in funds
from the 1989 -90 and 1990 -91 program years to be allocated to
the House of Ruth, a public service activity which is receiving
funding in the 1992 -93 program year, as well as a reprogramming
of approximately $17,750 in prior year funds toward grant
administration.
ABSTRACT
The Citizen's Participation Plan provides that the City Council hold an
advertised public hearing prior to approving the Final Statement for the
CDBG program year 1992 -93. Notice of the public hearing was published
in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper one month prior to the
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CDBG FINAL STATEMENT
June 3, 1992
Page 2
meeting and notices were posted in community locations througbout the
City ten days prior to the meeting. Following the public hearing, staff
will amend the Final Statement, if necessary, as directed by the City
Council, and submit the Final Statement to the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
BACKGROUND
On April 15, 1992, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss the
community's objectives for the Community Development Block Grant program
and to set priorities among the projects suggested by City staff,
community organizations, and residents. Following the public hearing,
the City Council approved the Preliminary Statement of Community
Development Objectives and directed staff to prepare a Final Statement
of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds which
includes the following activities:
Program Carry Over
(Estimated)
Administration $ 17,750
SW Cucamonga Streets $199,616
Sidewalk Grinding $ 11,424
Wheel Chair Ramps $ 11,410
Home Improvement $112,329
Oldtimers Foundation -0-
Graffiti Removal $ 31,540
Fair Housing -0_
Landlord/Tenant -0-
Neighborhood Center $ 67,777
Fair Housing Testing -0-
House of Ruth $ 2,561
(Roping. from Sr. Shared;
Homeless outreach -0-
Contingency -0-
FY
1992 -93
Total
(Estimated)
(Estimated)
$
92,450
$
110,200
$147,130
$
346,745
$
5,940
$
17,364
$
6,936
$
18,346
$227,292•
$
339,621*
$
5,000
5,000
$
10,412
$
41,952
$
8,476
$
8,476
$
7,628
$
7,628
$
6,410
$
74,187
$
2,614
$
2,814
$
2,000
$
4,561
$
10,000
$
10,000
$
31,770
$
31,770
Total $564,258• $1,016,664
These totals include an estimated $13,260 in program income.
Program income is received from repayment of deferred loans made
from participants of the Home Improvement Program. Funds received
will continue to be used to provide housing rehabilitation for lower
income, single family homeowners. The amount is an approximation of
what might be received. Income received will not be known until the
end of the fiscal year on June 30, 1992.
0-1
City Council Staff Report
CDHG Program Yr. 1392 -93
June 3, 1992
Page 3
ENVIRONKENTAL ASSESSNEW
A11 of the proposed activities are exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. All pro3ects are either exempt
or categorically excluded fro:.: the National Environmental Protection Act
(NEPA), contingent upon the implementation of mitigation, measures
regarding flood insurance and historic preservation review previously
adopted by the City Council.
CONCLUSION
The actions recommended above are adequate to meet all presubmission
requirements for the CDHG program in order for the City to receive its
1992 -93 CDHG program year entitlement. Upon the submission of the Final
Statement, the funds will be made available to the City on or about
July 1, 1992.
Aespe illy sub 0, / Hrad er
City lanner
BU: CN:mlq
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Final Statement of Co:mnunrcy Development
Objectives
Exhibit "H" - Resolution of Approval
1 1
FINAL STATEMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
FOR THE 1992 -93 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 1992
IDD
Page
I.
STANDARD APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ....................1
II.
INTRODUCIION ..................... ..............................2
III.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ....... ..............................4
IV.
STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ..................5
V.
PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS ........... ..............................7
VI.
POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO FLOODPLAINS AND
PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES . ...............................
16
ViI.
STATEMENTS OF POLICY ........... ...............................
19
A. Citizens' Participation Plan ............................
19
H. Relocation Policy ........ ...............................
20
C. Residential Anti - Displacement Plan ...................... 21
D. Criteria for Substantial Change .........................
22
VIII.
CERTIFICATIONS ................. ...............................
24
jbl
LIST OF FIGUI S -
Figure No. Fa ge
1 Floodplain Boundary Map. ................................. *'*a*is
I bZ
APPLICATION FOR
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
r..e w w.wv.'NE
.J 4'.C,IrT H.AONNIIrM
T 11
v Nm:.rr "uclT '� No.f nru
DA4
YR fUWrnEO AgyC.IX tWMrNY
B- 92 -MC-96 -0556
.. Yrt acEN[D a fTAn wu ADVUIOn b.nlXr
Y/A A
. Yn.ECEIVEO.v rf. W.01N I I a..,I.N,'.I,Ir
tqn 4.m.
r,t. Of Rancho Cucamonga
.Nr,v D'.. uM ce,N Iuu ,M yO Cwrl
P.O. Box 8G%
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucalaonga, CA 9172 9
. 1.11011. I�D .II AMM NUY,E. IEN1
2 1 1 o z
. rvrew..rLKAnoN
y'] w. ❑ ConlmuYOn E) A.nYOn
V A.n,— Y^'!. ,W eja. YnYIEr n It.lal ❑
A ircryu A.nO B AnaIM AwWd C Kna11 WYm
C D,.rau Dw,14n al., uA.1rh1
1. 41100 u• gD}ML DOYESM
'ALn"WE NVYaR 1 4 EI P
TeIE
Community Development Block Gle
: 414 ✓Ifmv 11 POWICf w'Y... .anlnn. WN..b t
0,0Y.7.Gbr LMI
Planping 0.CleiOn
0}440.1
NYM erE Y>.dvY rXNlp.r N :N Yrbn b tI rm : <W Or: m,:l.r, nw..V
IN. ,pD.tlpbr Ipn..r1. cN"1
Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
I. M1/[ D/ AIRICINI: NnM A,~." NIY. Nl G0 /I IJr f
/r wY H NO.o.r.Oml $clod De
B GOdX/ I wl. (gNrf/rl0 YdIr WIM DI MyM le.rnfQ _
C f111.crDY - J N.. lllrnwYN
G To W. R b PE,.
E .WFNOl. -L .Y.1GN/
L W.rllruwp.l Y NWd 6yn(/Ibn
G SwdM OrurrJ N alr IED..m
f, IYYl D1 /fDEMLND.NC.
U.S. Department of Housinq 6 Urban Developmel
II. DSSCbIiM t w A..LK l ORCWt ..
1. Housing Rehabilitation: Moderate s Minor
2. Sidewalks s Street Improvements
3. Landlord /Tenant Mediation d Fair Housing
4. Community Facilities Improvements
5- Public Services: homeless ootreach;
House of Ruth; Graffiti Removal
City of Rancho Cucamonga
II rsoresfD mncT . roNOavaNU TNCTfw
S,Y, D.,. F,4 q Dau • App' D hD n
7/11/92 6/30/93 35 35
If ISWAAnDIY4MND' IL.Y AI•YcA• AOILAT1O M,nA W P.m StSCUMN 000En 1}Sn MgfffST
T Tf.E
. ciYY
t 551x000 .W
s VFS THE TtOWWaiCATf]Nw[Sf AVNA E O
STATE EWCUME OIfDEA 12172 PMUSS FOIL YEVIEw ON
DATE
I•D ❑ PgpGgA. d NOT CAVENED B1 E O 1217}
D AeDYAn1
t .00
c STAN
a 1v:.1
t .00
Q DR FRC[iIW1 NA$ NDT MEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
Oar
E W
G,DDryn NrCmV
E 13,260 OD
1r.•PIE AINIC4ff aLNIMRY70N ANN EEWIIAI Oan
Q Na Sva'.nw .N YrDIYYIO, ®I1O
v lol A:
t 564,241 ro
—_
rE l01Xf.EfIO.YN.Y0YlE0W AMD AfIIff All YfA IN MN AIRICE7XyI MfAI.lVi1D11 Y1EfI1W ANO Wlll1[C1. Mf DOCV.IEMXAfaENWLN
11 +d117ED fv IN( 40YF1YIM6 WDI OI 7N2 YILCUIf AND MI WLILAM NM1l COYhV MNII Mf .nACNfD LV VMNC[l If 1M 4fIfT.NC[ IS .NA/ID(D
Aom,,,.0 A.y.fMI.NH
D 1NY
. iENN1UrY n1rmE..
Dennis L. Stout
Mayor
(714) 989 -1861
e $pn.lUr. d AN1vVa
I . No 54.b
1 D3
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF :24
it a stacdard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preappiications and applications submitted
ederal assstance. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification tnat States which here
penned a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program
included iri their process, have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission
Emrv:
Self-explanatory
Date application submitted to Federal agency for
State if applicable) & applicant's control number
l if cap hcab le)
State use oniy (if applicable).
If this application is to continue or revise an
existing award, enter present Federal identifier
number !ffor a new project,!tave blank.
Legal name of applicant, name of primary
organizational unit which will undertake the
assistance activity, complete address of the
appiicant, and name and telephone number of the
person to contact on matters related to this
application
Enter Employer IdentiLcation \umber (EIN) as
assigned by the Internal Revenue Service.
Enter the appropriate letter in the space
provided
Check appropriate box and enter appropriate
I etterts) m the space(s) provided
— "New" means a new assistance award.
Continuation" means an extension for an
additional funding /budget period for a project
v,,tth a projected completiondate.
— "Revision" means any change in the Federal
Government's financial obligation or
contingent liability from an existing
obligation,
tiame of Federal agency from which assistance is
be i ng requested with this application.
Lse the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
number and title of the program under which
assistance is requested,
Enter a brief descriptive title of the project if
more than one program is involved, you should
append an explanation on a separate sheet. If
appropriate (e.g, construction or real property
projects), attach a map showing project location.
For preappiications, use a separate sheet to
provide a summary description of this project.
Item. Entry
12. List only the largest poiitica! entities air• ^cd
(c .g.. SC.., ..vuuues, cities).
13. Self-explanatory
Id. List the applicant's Congressional District and
any District(s) affected by the program or project
15, Amount requested or to be contributed during
the first funding /budget period by each
contributor. Value of in kind contributions
should be included on appropriate lines as
applicable. If the action will result in a dollar
change to an existing award, indicate onfi the
amount of the change. For decreases. enclose the
amounts in parentheses. If both basic and
supplemental amounts are included, show
breakdown on an attached sheet For multiple
program funding, use totals and show breakdown
using same categories as item 15.
16. Applicants should contact the State Single Point
of Contact (SPOC) for Federal Executive Order
12372 to determine whether the application is
subject to the State intergovernmental review
process.
17. This question applies to the applicant organs
zction, not the person who signs as the
authorized representative. Categories of debt
include delinquent audit disallowances. loans
and taxes.
18. To be, signed by the authorized representative of
the applicant. A copy of the governing body's
authorization for you to sign this application as
official representative must be on File in the
applicant's office. (Certain Federal agencies may
require that this authorization be submitted as
partofthe application.)
II - INTRODUCTION
The Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds is the
Primary document intended to provide the residents of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga with an opportunity to review and comment upon the ways in
which funds from the Community Development Block Grant (CUED) program
are to be used to support neighborhood improvement activities throughout
the City. This document establishes a comprehensive set of long -term
goals and short-term strategies which will most effectively target these
important resources to meet the community's needs.
The Final Statement is specifically designed to encourage participation
by all residents of the City in identifying the community's housing,
community development, and public service needs and in evaluating the
strategies which are proposed to meet these needs. Upon approval by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City staff will
incorporate the statement into the City's application for funding from
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the
CDBG program for fiscal year 1992 -93.
THE COLMtUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
The CDBG program is funded by the federal government through the U.S.
Department of HUD. The program provides federal funds directly to
cities and counties for a variety of housing, community development, and
public service activities. The amount of funds which may be received by
each eligible City and County is determined by a mathematical formula
which measures the community's population, the age of the housing stock,
and extent of persons living in poverty.
Each City and County decides for itself how the money can best be used
to meet the unique needs of its residents. Within the guidelines
established by the program, each City and County evaluates its own
needs, then designs and operates activities to meet those needs.
The primary goals of the CDBG program are to improve the living
conditions and economic opportunities of lower income persons, to
prevent and eliminate community blight and blighting influences, and to
meet urgent needs for which no other resources can be found. A minimum
of 70 percent of the benefits of the CDBG funded activities meet be
directed to activities which assist lower income persons either by
providing benefits and services directly to lower income persons, or by
improving neighborhoods which are occupied primarily by lower income
persons.
L2^
IDH
THE CDBG APPLICATION
Each year, communities wishing to receive CDBG funds must provide to the
U.S. Department. of Housing and Urban Development an application, along
witi an evaluation of the community's needs, long -term goals, short -term
objectives, and proposed activities for the coming year. T'ne
application also includes several statements of policy regarding how
CDBG funds will be used to minimize displacement of residents, provide
relocation ben ±fits where necessary, and evaluate the need to receive
additional community input amending is proposed activities. Finally,
the application must also include a series of certifications by which
the community agrees to meet the requirements of federal law in carrying
out its CDBG funded activities.
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THE CDBG APPLICATION PROCESS
in preparing the CDBG application, each community , required to
establish a Citizen's Participation Plan that provides the public an
opportunity to review and comment upon the proposed uses of CDBG
funds. The Citizens' Participation Plan, for the City of 7ancho
Cucamonga is included in this document.
In accordance with the Citizens' Participation Plan, the CDBG program
staff solicited ideas for projects to receive CDBG funding during the
upcoming year. Letters were sent to all community groups and agencies
which have previously submitted suggestions, as well as to all City
departments. An advertisement was published in the local paper inviting
additional suggestions. The City Council reviewed the Preliminary
Statement at a public hearing on April 15, 1992. At that meeting, the
City Council approved the Preliminary Statement and directed staff to
prepare the Final Statement.
A public hearing on the Final Statement of objectives and Projected Use
of Funds is a required part of the Citizens' Participation Plan.
Notices of the public hearing to be held on the Final Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds were published on May 1, 1992 in
the local paper, one month before the City Council meeting date of
June 3, 1992, and notices were posted in community locations ten days
prior to the meeting.
44—
1G5
III - COM![OMITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
In order to integrate the projects and activities undertaken through the
Community Development Block Grant (CDEG) program with other housing and
community development activities undertaken by the City and to
coordinate long -term goals and short -term objectives, the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts the following Community
Development Plan.
THE GENERAL PLAN
The General Plan is the primary document establishing the goals and
objectives of the nousing and community development projects and
activities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All
projects and activities undertaken through the CDBG program are to be in
compliance with the General Plan. In addition, in selecting the
projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG program, the
City will first consider those projects which most directly serve to
implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan.
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), which is
prepared each year for submission to the D.S. Department of HUD, is the
primary document establishing the goals and objectives of the housing
development, mortgage and rental assistance, and residential
rehabilitation activities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. The five year CHAS was prepared in compliance with the
Housing Element of the General Plan. In developing and revising the
CHAS, on an arnual basis, the City will first consider those projects
which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the
Housing Element.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIFIC PLANS
The Specific Plans adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency are the
primary documents establishing the goals and objectives of the Community
Redevelopment Agency funded activities to prevent and eliminate blight
and blighting influences in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In selecting
projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG program in
lower income and Community Redevelopment Agency target areas, the City
will first consider those projects which most directly serve to
implement the goals and objectives of the Specific Plans.
by
�U�
IV - STATEtffiR7 OF COlMR7ITY DEVEIMM" OBJECTIVES
In order to establish long -term goals and objectives for the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, hereby adopts the following Statement of Comm nity
Development Objectives:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
1. To revitalize and stabilize deteriorating neighborhoods, to prevent
and eliminate blight and blighting influences, and to eliminate
conditions detrimental to the health, safety, and public welfare.
2. To upgrade the City's substandard rental and owner- occupied housing
stock through various forms of financial assistance for residential
rehabilitation.
3. To provide improvements to public areas and public facilities which
make them more useful and attractive, including developing and
improving parks and recreational facilities.
4. To fund public services which improve the quality of the living
environment and complement physical development activities being
conducted in the City.
5. To fund public services which improve the quality of life for lower
income persons, including senior citizens, handicapped, and
homeless persons.
6. To assist with the expansion of facilities and public services
which improve the quality of life for senior citizens.
7. To provide incentives for the preservation of historic properties
through the elimination of structural code deficiencies.
8. To provide information and affirmative support toward the goal of
ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home of their
choice in a suitable living environment.
9. To provide the administrative capacity to implement the City's MEG
program, fair housing, and landlord /tenant mediation services, and
to coordinate the research, planning, and implementation of General
Plan and Housing Element revisions.
�dl
SPECIFIC COlLMUNITY DEVEDOPffENT NEEDS
In order to provide for the development of specific activities in
support of the goals and objectives described above, the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby identifies the Following specific
needs to be met through the CDBG program:
Financial assistance for owners of single family residences
occupied by lower income households to encourage housing
rehabilitation is needed to improve the quality of housing
affordable to such persons and to prevent the deterioration of the
housing stock which otherwise might result from a lack of resources
for housing maintenance available to owners of housing affordable
to such households. The provision of such assistance also
contributes to the City's general efforts to promote housing
quality standards and eliminate structural code deficiencies
citywide.
2. The provision of incentives for the rehabilitation of historic
properties and the elimination of structural deficiencies is needed
to prevent and eliminate blight, blighting influences, and
conditions detrimental to public health and safety.
3. The continuation of the City's ongoing efforts to design and
construct street and sidewalks needed to improve the living
environments and prevent the deterioration Of the transportation
infrastructure in low /moderate neighborhoods.
5. The provision of landlord /tenant mediation and fair housing
services.
5. Provision of expanded recreational facilities serving low /moderate
income areas and senior citizens.
6. Elimination of the blighting influence of graffiti from
low /moderate income neighborhoods.
7. The provision of Public Service Activities to assist low /moderate
income persons and those with special or urgent needs, including
but not exclusive to, such activities as assistance, to the
homeless, job services and referrals, and battered womens shelter
facilities.
0.
IC&
V - PPDJWC USE OF FONDS _
ON -GOING PROGRAMS
A. ADMINISTRATION
Description:
This program will provide for the continuing
administration of the CDBG program,
including activities to coordi na'ce the
implementation of the CDBG program with the
City's other community development and
planning activities.
Location:
This program would provide for the
administration of the CDBG oroaram citywi.de.
Eligibility:
This project is eligible under Section.
570.206 of the CORO regulations.
Benefit:
This program provides for benefits to the
persons and neighborhoods to be served by
the following programs.
National Objective:
570.208(d)(4)
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Proposed Funding:
$ 92,450
Carry Over /Reprogram
(Estimated): $ 17,750
Total:
$110,206
B. HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Description: The continuation of the provision of grants,
amortized loans, and deferred loans to lower
income occupants of single family
residences, including mobile homes, as an
incentive to maintain or upgrade the
existing affordable housing stock which
otherwise might fall into disrepair. There
are three proposed components to the Housing
Rehabilitation Program:
1. The Low-Interest Loan Program would
provide amortized low- interest loans of
up to $20,000 to owners of single -
family residences occupied by lower
income persons.
VW
1 cj_1
National Objective:
2. The Deferred Loan Program would provide
non- amcrtrzed loans of up to $15,000 to
senior citizens, households headed by
Project Funding:
handicapped persons, and very -low
income families who are owner - occupants
of single-family residences. The loans
(Estimate):
would be due and payable upon sale of
the home.
$ 13,260
3. The Rome Rehabilitation Grant Program
Total:
would provide grants of op to $5,000 to
lower income owner- occupants of single -
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
family residences.
Location:
All programs would be available citywide.
Eligibility:
Th1.s program is eligible under Section
570.202 of the CDBG Regulations.
Benefit:
All loans and grants will be used for the
sidewalks for specific streets in
rehabilitation of residences occupied by
lower income households.
National Objective:
570.208(.)(3)
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
$214,032
Carry Over /Reprogram
(Estimate):
$112,329
Program Income:
$ 13,260
Total:
$339,621
C. SOUTHWEST CUCAMONGA
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Description:
This project involves the design
and
constriction of streets, curbs, gutters,
and
sidewalks for specific streets in
the
southwest Cucamonga neighborhood.
Location:
The following activities are proposed to
be
funded this year:
1. Design and construction of a waterline
on the south side of 9th Street
from
Vinmar Avenue to Sierra Madre.
2. Construction along Vinmar Avenue
from
9th Street to Chaffey Alley,
181x,
I' ,
D.
E.
Eligibility:
This protect is eligible under Section
570.201(c) of the CDBG Regulations.
Benefit:
The streets to be improved are located in an
area where 51 percent or more of the
residents are lower intone.
National Objective:
570.20B(1)(ii)
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding;
$147,130
Carry Over /Reprogram
$199,616
(Estimated):
Total:
$346,745
SIDEWALK C-RINDING
Description:
This project involves the grinding of
displaced sidewalks by trees.
Location:
The project that will be undertaken is
approximately 500 scattered sites.
Eligibility:
This project is eligible under Section
570.201(c) of the CDBG regulations.
Benefit:
The sidewalks to be repaired are located in
lower income areas.
National Objective:
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
$ 5,940
Carry over /Reprogram
$11,424
(Estimated):
Total:
$17,364
WHEELCHAIR RAMPS
Description:
This project involves the retrofitting of
existing curbs to accommodate handicapped
persons. The project will be done in three
phases over three years. This is the second
phase.
Location:
The project will be undertaken citywide.
111
F
G.
Eligibility:
The project is eligible under Section
570.210(k).
Benefit:
The project will benefit the handicapped who
are presumed by HOD to he low and moderate
income persons.
National Objective:
570,208(a)(i)(a).
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
$ 6,936
Carry Over /Reprogram
$11,410
(Estimated):
Total.:
$18,346
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
Description:
This project involves the removal of
graffiti from single - family residences and
public properties.
Location:
The project will be implemented in the block
grant target neighborhoods.
Eligibility:
The project is eligible under Section
570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations.
Benefit:
The project will eliminate blight causing
influences from low /moderate income
neighborhoods.
National Objective:
570.208(b)(2).
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
$10,412
Carry Over /Reprogram
$31,540
(Estimated):
Total:
$41,952
FAIR HOUSING
Description:
The City is required by CDBG regulations to
provide this activity. Rancho Cucamonga
contracts with the Inland Mediation Board to
provide public education, mediation,
counseling, and legal referral services to
promote fair housing.
+ABA
112--
Location:
Services will be provided through the Inland
Mediation Board, 420 North Lenon Avenue,
Ontario, California 91764. Services will be
available citywide.
Eligibility:
The project is eligible under Section
570.201(e) of the UDBG program.
Benefit:
The project will service a limited
clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are
low or moderate income persons.
National Objective:
570.208(a)(2)(i)(b b d).
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
$8,476
H. LANDLORD /TENANT MEDIATION
Description:
This project will provide landlord /tenant
dispute mediation services and provide
information and referral to City residents.
Location:
Services will be provided through the Inland
Mediation Board, 420 North Leman Avenue,
Ontario, California 91764. Services will be
available citywide,
Eligibility:
This project is eligible under Section
570.201(e) of the CORD program.
Benefit:
This project will service a limited
clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are
lax or moderate income persons.
National Objective:
570.208(a)(2)(i)(b s d).
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
NEW PROGRAMS
I. OLUrIMERS FOUNDATION
Description:
$7,628
This program will complement the City's Home
Improvement Program by providing immediate
service for emergency and small home
repairs. The program will be available to
low income and senior households. Repairs
would include such items as minor
electrical, plumbing, and roof patching.
+1Y-�
�� l
Cost for material is limited to $100 per
job, with a maxlmum of two visits per
household allowed in a year.
Allowance will also be made for emergency
repairs involving health and safety items.
With City approval, a one -time grant of up
to $200 will he allowed.
Services will be prcvided by the Oldtimers
Location:
Foundation, 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana,
California. Services will be available
citywide.
Eligibility:
This pr0]ect is eligible under Section
570.202 of the CDBG program.
Benefit:
All grants will be used for the minor
rehabilitation of residences Occupied by
lower income households.
National objective:
570.208(a)(3).
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
$5,000
Project Funding:
J. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER REHABILITATION
In addition to providing handicap
Description:
improvements, which were approved in the
prior year, significant rehabilitation to
the structure is required. Rehabilitation
work will include re- roofing, installing new
flooring, and painting the exterior. Funds
previously allocated for design Of new
improvements on the site will be
re- allocated toward rehabilitation of the
structure. Additional funds from this
program year will be allocated to complete
the improvements.
Location:
City of Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood
Center, 9791 Arrow Route.
Eligibility:
This project is eligible under Section
570.201(c).
Benefit:
The Center is located in a low income target
area, CT21, SG3, though services are
provided to eligible residents who live
outside the target area. Primary users of
�� l
L. HOUSE OF RUIN
Description: Provides shelter, programs, opportunity, and
education for battered women and their
children who are at -risk of homelessness.
Services provided include 24 -hour emergency
safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24 -hour
crisis intervention hotline, 24 -hour
emergency transportation, outreach offices,
children's programs, legal and social
advocacy, as well as cosmunity education and
r}3°
15'
the :.enter are senior citizens with numerous
activities benefiting low income individuals
and families.
National Objective:
570.208(a)(2J(i)(a) Limited clientele.
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
$ 6,410
Carry over /Reprogram
$67,777
(Estimated):
Total:
$74,187
K. FAIR HOUSING TESTING
Description:
The purpose of this program is to test
alleged discrimination cases and to provide
back -up to Federal and State enforcement
departments. Inland Mediation will hire and
train appropriate staff. This provides a
complement to the City's Fair Housing
program.
Location:
Services will he provided through the Inland
Mediation Board, 420 North Lemon Avenue,
Ontario, California 91764. The program will
be implemented citywide.
Eligibility:
This project is eligible under Section
570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations.
Benefit:
This project will serve a limited clientele,
at least 51 percent of whom are low, or
moderate income persona.
National Objective:
570.208(a)(2)(i)(d).
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding:
$2,814
L. HOUSE OF RUIN
Description: Provides shelter, programs, opportunity, and
education for battered women and their
children who are at -risk of homelessness.
Services provided include 24 -hour emergency
safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24 -hour
crisis intervention hotline, 24 -hour
emergency transportation, outreach offices,
children's programs, legal and social
advocacy, as well as cosmunity education and
r}3°
15'
violence prevention programs. Funds
remaining from the Senior_ Shared program
from the 1989-90 and 1990 -91 fiscal years,
$2,561 wi 11 be reprogrammed for this
project.
Location: Services are provided by the House of Ruth,
P.O. Box 457, Claremont, California 91711.
Services are available on an as needed ba <as
to Rancho Cucamonga residents.
Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section
570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations.
Benefit: The project will serve a limited clientele
who are presumed to be low income due to the
nature of their circumstance.
National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(a)
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding: $2,000
Carry over /Reprogram $2,561
(Estimated):
(Reprogram from Sr. Share)
Total:
M. HOMELESS OUTREACH
$4,561
Description:
The project will provide assistance to
persons who are or are at -risk of becoming
homeless. A variety of services are
provided including such things as clothing,
personal grooming, identification
acquisition, shelter vouchers or referrals,
bus tokens, drug and alcohol education,
literacy classes, food and nutrition
classes, etc.
Location:
Services will be provided through the
Homeless Outreach and Referral Program,
122 S. Vine Street, Ontario, California
91762. Services will be available on an as
needed basis to Rancho Cucamonga residents.
Eligibility:
This project is eligible under Section
570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations.
Benefit:
This project will serve a limited clientele
who are presumed to be low income by the
nature of their situation.
�1�
National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(a).
Fiscal Year 1992-93
Project Funding: $10,000
N. CCNTINGENCV
Description: This amount, which represents 5.7 percent of
the grant amount, is being held in order to
cover any potential cost overruns or it may
be reprogrammed into the proposed job center
pilot program. There are a significant
number of issues that need to be resolved
before final, determination can be made
regarding the pilot program although it is
hoped that the matter will be resolved by
June.
Location: The funds could be available for use in any
of the programs discussed above.
Fiscal Year 1992 -93
Project Funding: $31,770
�i1
VI - POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO PLOOOPLAINS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Jnder. Federal Executive Order, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required
to protect floodplains and to reduce the risk of losses from floods by
not conducting, supporting, or allowing activities to take place in
floodplains unless the activities constitute the only practical
alternatives to meeting community needs.
Although most of the water courses in the City have been channeled to
reduce flood hazards, there are some areas which are potentially subject
to flooding in a 100-year flood. As indicated on the map attached as
Figure 1, several of the proposed activities are to be undertaken in
floodplain areas at -risk for a 100 -year flood. These activities are
designed to alleviate the deterioration of public and private property
already located in the floodplain. Therefore, these activities do not
directly or indirectly support development within the floodplain.
Staff of the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
assessed the long- and short -term risks of undertaking the activities
within the floodplains and has assessed mitigation measures which may be
included in the design of the activities. Public notice of the
intention to undertake activities within the floodplain was published in
the local newspaper to provide citizens the opportunity to comment upon
the activities. Notices were also provided to interested public
agencies.
SOUTHWEST CUCAMONGA STREET IMPROVEMENTS
In previous years, staff considered alternatives to providing public
improvements in areas of Southwest Cucamonga located in identified flood
hazard zones. All street improvements proposed for funding through the
1992 -93 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) have previously been
reviewed and approved by the City Council.
The Council has previously made a finding that the street Improvement
activities which are proposed for the 1992 -93 CDBG program are the most
practical and desirable alternatives, and that adequate mitigation
measures have been identified and designed into the projects. The
design, location, and size of the projects have not changed subsequent
to the finding; therefore, no new finding is required.
HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION INCENTIVES
The Council has also made a previous finding that the Home Improvement
Program and Historic Preservation Incentives Program are the most
practical and desirable alternatives and that adequate mitigation
measures have been identified and designed into the projects. Included
as a part of the Home Improvement Program is the newly funded minor
emergency repair grant program. Adding additional funding to these
ongoing programs and the new emergency repair program requires a new
finding. (Although no new funding is proposed for Historic Preservation
for the 1992 -93 fiscal year.)
✓W�r
gig
Staff considered alternatives to incertaxing these activities in the
floodplain areas and found them impractical and undesirable. One
alternative would be to exclude properties in these areas from the
programs. This would leave residences in these areas which are occupied
by lower income persons unprotected from the deterioration which may
otherwise result from the deferred maintenance likely to occur where
financial assistance for home improvements is unavailable. Lxcloding
historic properties from the program would similarly fail to protect
such properties. The other alternative, removing the structures from
the floodplain, is clearly impractical.
In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for structures which are to be
rehabilitated under these programs, the City may require that owners of
properties located in flood hazard areas show evidence of federal flood
insurance coverage before rehabilitation assistance is provided.
FINDING
In order to approve operating the House Rehabilitation Program,
including the minor emergency repair program, and Historic Preservation
Incentives Program within the flaodplain the City Council must find
that:
It is necessary to undertake the activities in the floodplain in
older to protect residences occupied by lower income persons and
historic properties from the deterioration which may otherwise
result from the deferred maintenance likely to occur where
financial assistance for repairs and improvements is unavailable.
2. Adequate measures designed to mitigate the risk of property loss
which may result from undertaking the activities have been
identified and included in the operation of the activities.
The activities conform to applicable state and regional floodplain
management standards.
41 7
l q
VII - STATEMENTS OF POLICY
A. CITIZEN'S PARTICIPATION PLAN
The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the
participation of its residents in the process of identifying
projects for funding through the Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program. The City will, in conducting the CDBG program,
follow this Citizens' Participation Plan.
Outreach. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages citizen
participation; with a particular emphasis on participation by
persons of low and moderate income and residents of
neighborhoods which are experiencing physical deterioration.
In order to reach as many residents and community groups as
possible, letters will be sent to community organizations and
individuals who have participated in the program or suggested
projects in recent years. In addition, a display
advertisement will be published in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin at least one month prior to considerat_on of the
preliminary statement.
2. Notice. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides citizens with
advance notice of all meetings related to the MEG program and
makes copies of all related materials available for public
review as soon as notice is given. Notice of the hearing on
the Preliminary statement of Community Development Objectives
will be published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper at least 10 days prior to the hearing.
3. Technical Assistance. The City will publish the names and
telephone numbers of staff familiar with the CDBG program who
are available to answer questions and help residents and
community groups package a proposal.
4. Public Near ings. The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses public
hearings to obtain citizens' views and to respond to proposals
and questions at all stages of the program. A hearing is held
on the Preliminary Statement of Community Development
Objectives at which the City's housing and community
development needs are reviewed, past policies and programs are
discussed, and each proposed project is explained. A
preliminary selection of objectives and programs is then made
and published for public review and comment. The hearing on
the final grant application is held a month later. All
hearings are duly noticed. Agendas and staff reports are
available in advance. The meetings are held at City Hall,
which is fully accessible to the handicapped.
-Ism
7,'
5. Lanquage Accessibility. Several neighborhoods have
substantial hispanic populations. At meetings where it is
likely that the attendees will not be bilingual, the City will
provide an interpreter to ensure that residents can understand
and participate in the procedures.
6. Responsiveness. Once projects have been funded and are under
way, the City is committed to ensuring the satisfactory
execution of each project. Staff provides a timely response
to all written complaints, usually within 15 working days.
B. RELOCATION POLICY
Recent changes in the regulations governing the expenditure of CDBG
funds require that the City establish a policy governing the
provision of relocation assistance to any family, individual,
business, non - profit organization, or farm that results from
implementation of its CDBG programs. It is the policy of the City
to avoid displacement of all families, individuals, businesses,
non - profit organization, or farms in carrying out its CDBG
programs.
No displacement is expected to result from the activities proposed
for the 1992--83 program year. However, in the event that operation
of any of the CDBG funded activities results in the voluntary or
involuntary displacement of any family, individual, business, non-
profit organization, or farm (whether owner or renter), the City
will provide relocation assistance in accordance with the standards
and guidelines set forth in the Federal Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, Section 7260 (et
seq.) of the State of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter
6) and the guidelines issued by the State of California Department.
of Housing and Community Development, as applicable. The City will
meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff
and consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors,
social agencies, and civic organizations.
It is the City's objective that all displaces be relocated with a
minimum of hardship in accommodations which are decent, safe,
sanitary, and suitable to their individual needs; located in areas
not less desirable than their current location in regard to public
utilities and public and commercial facilities; and reasonably
accessible to their customers or places of employment and priced
within their financial means.
The City will handle those cases requiring relocation which result
from implementation of CDBG activities on an individual case -by-
case manner. Services provided to eligible displacees chall
include but not be limited to:
o Providing information on project activities, rights, benefits,
and options open to them.
6P0�
122,
o Maintaining liaison between displacees and agencies of firms
with resources to assist them (e.
g�, ^C ha tuber of Commerce,
Small Business Administration, Office of Local Economic
Development, lending institutions, realtors, etc.).
o Locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the
production of accommodations to meet the needs of all
displacees.
o Assisting displacees in obtaining financing.
o Assisting displacees in securing priority consideration for
rental assistance, public housing, or other housing assistance
activities.
o Making referrals to appropriate social, comunity, and welfare
agencies.
o Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinating all
relocation activities.
o Providing all families, individuals, businesses, institutions,
and farms which are displaced by CDBG funded activities with
written notice of this policy, the types of services available
to them, and the amount of relocation assistance for which
they may be eligible. (Payments will be in the amounts
established by State and Federal Guidelines.)
City staff and consultants will be available to answer questions
and provide information and, by their early involvement, to see
that relocation proceeds with a minimum of hardship.
C. RESIDENTIAL ANTI - DISPLACEMENT PLAN
Section 104 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974
requires each grantee to adopt, make public, and certify that it is
following a residential anti - displacement plan providing one -for-
one replacement units in cases where residential units are
demolished as a consequence of an activity funded through the CDBG
program, The plan must include steps that will be taken to
minimize the displacement of persons from their homes resulting
from any activity funded under the CDBG program. The plan must
include steps that will be taken to minimize the displacement of
persons from their homes resulting from any activity funded under
the CDBG program.
It is not anticipated that any demolition of residential structures
will occur as a result of any of the activities proposed to be
undertaken during the 1992 -93 program year. However, in accordance
with the Act, the City of Rancho Cucamonga establishes this
Residential Anti - Displacement Plan.
. M_
1,2 1
The City of Rancho Cucamonga will replace all occupied and
vacant occupiable lower income dwelling units demolished or
converted to a use other than as Sower income housing as a
direct result of activities assisted with funds provided under
the housing and Community Development Oct of 1974, as amended,
and as described in 24 CFR 577.606(b)(1).
2. All replacement housing will be provided within three _years of
the commencement of the demolition or rehabilitation relating
to conversion.
3. Before obligating or expending funds that will directly result
in such demolition or conversion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
will make public and submit to the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development the following information in writing:
a. A description of the proposed activity.
b. The general location on a map and the approximate number
of dwelling units by number of bedrooms that will be
demolished or converted to a use other than as lower
income housing as a direct result of the proposed
activity.
c. A time schedule for the commencement and completion of
the demolition or conversion.
d. The general location on a map and approximate number of
dwelling units by number of bedrooms that wi.11 be
provided as replacement dwelling units.
e. The source of funding and a time schedule for the
provision of replacement dwelling units.
f. The basis for concluding that each replacement dwelling
unit will remain a lower income dwelling unit for at
least ten years from the date of initial occupancy.
D. CRITERIA FOR SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE
Federal regulations for the CDBG program require the City to notify
affected citizens and provide them the opportunity to comment on
any proposed activity which is added, deleted, or substantially
changed in terms of purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries
following the submission of the Final Statement of Community
Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds to the V.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. The regulations
require the City to adopt and make public its definition of
"substantial change." The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall consider
a "substantial change" to have occurred under the following
circumstances:
bd2--
l'L�
1. The amount to be allocated to any activity is proposed to be
increased or decreased from the amount in the Final Statement
by more than 25 percent.
2. The location of the activity, target area, or eligibility
criteria of the program, is changed from that described in the
Final Statement.
3. An activity not included in the Final Statement is proposed
for funding.
4. An activity included in the Final Statement is proposed for
elimination or cessation.
Should the City Council consider a substantial change in any CDB
funded activity, the public will be notified and provided an
opportunity to comment upon the proposed change.
{i3"
175-
VIII — CERTIFICATIONS
_n accordance with the Housing and Cormun:ty Development Act of 1974, as
amended, and with 24 CFA 570.303 of tic. Commmi *_y Develooment Block
Grant (CDBG) regulations, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that:
(a) It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to
execute a community development and housing program.
(b) She City Council has duly adopted a resolution authorizing the
Mayor to submit the final statement and amendments, thereto,
and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and
d:'recting and authorizing the Mayor to act in connection with
the submission of the final statement and to provide such
additional information as may be required.
(c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, it has:
Met the citizen participation requirements of 570.301(b).
2. Prepared its Final Statement of Community Development
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds in accordance with
570.301(c) and made the Final Statement available to the
public.
(d) It is following a Detailed Citizen Participation Plan which:
1. Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with
particular emphasis on participation by persons of low
and moderate income who are residents of slum and
blighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed
to be used and provides for participation of residents in
Low and moderate income neighborhoods as defined by the
City;
2. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to
local meetings, information, and records relating to the
grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the
regulations of the Secretary of HUD and relating to the
actual use of funds under the Act;
3. Provides for technical assistance to groups
representative of persons of low and moderate income that
request such assistance in developing proposals with the
level and type of assistance to be determined by the
grantee;
4. Provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and
to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of
the community development program, including at least the
development of needs, the review of proposed activities,
eflJ—�
17
and review of program performance, which hearings shall
be held after adequate notice, at times and locations
convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and with
accommodation for the handicapped:
5. Provides for a timely written answer to written
couplaints and grievances, within 15 working days where
practicable; and
6. Identifies how t).e needs of non - English sneaking
residents will be met in the case of public hearings
where a significant number of non - English speaking
residents can be reasonably expected to participate.
(e) The grant will be. conducted and administered in compliance
with:
1. 'Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-
352, 42 U.S.C. #2000d et seg.).
2. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 -20).
(f) It will affirmatively further fair housing.
(g) It has developed its Final Statement of Projected Use of Funds
no as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which
benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the
prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the Final
Statement of Projected Use of Funds may also include
activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet
other community development needs having a particular urgency
because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate
threat to the health or welfare of the community and other
financial resources are nor, available); except that the
aggregate use of CDBG funds received under Section 106 of the
Act, and if applicable, under Section 108 of the Act, during
the 1992 -93 program year, shall principally benefit persons of
low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less
than 70 percent of such funds are used for activities that
benefit such persons during such period.
(hl It has developed a community development plan, for the period
specified in paragraph (g) above, that identifies community
development and housing needs and specifics both short- and
long -term community development objectives that have been
developed in accordance with the primary objective and
requirements of the Act.
(1) It is following a current comprehensive housing affordability
strategy (CHAS) which has been approved by HUD pursuant to
570.306 and Part 91, and that any housing activities to be
assisted with CDBG funds will be consistent with the CHAS.
b1 S
t7 1
(j) It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public
improvements assisted in whole or in part with funds provided
under Section 106 of the Act or with amounts resulting from a
guarantee under Section 108 of the Act by assessing anv amount
against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and
moderate income, including any fee charged or assessments made
as a condition of obtaining access to such public
improvements, unless:
1. Funds received under Section 106 of the Act are used to
pay the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates
to the capital costs of such public improvements that are
financed from revenue sources other than under Title I of
the Act; or
2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties
owned and occupied by persons of moderate income, the
grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks
sufficient funds received under Section 106 of the Act to
comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1) above.
iX) It's notification, inspection, testing, and abatement
procedures concerning lead -based paint will comply with
570.608.
(1) It will comply with the acquisition and relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as required under
570.606(a) and Federal implementing requ lationsl the
requirements in 570.606(b) governing residential anti -
displacement and relocation assistance plan under Section
104(d) of the Act (including a certification that the grantee
is following such a plan); the relocation requirements of
570.606(c) governing displacement subject to Section 104(X) of
the Act; and the relocation requirements of 570.606(d)
governing optional relocation assistance under Section
105(a)(11) of the Act.
(m) It has adopted and is enforcing:
A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law
enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any
individuals engaged in non - violent civil rights
demonstrations; and
A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws
against physically barring entrance to or exit from a
facility or location which is the subject of such non-
violent civil rights demonstration within its
jurisdiction;
�E6 /n
(n) To the best of its knowledge and belief;
No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be
paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer
or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal
contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of
any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any federal contract,
grant, loan, or cooperative agreement:
2. if any funds other than federal appropriated funds have
been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit
Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,"
in accordance with its instructions) and
3. It will require that the language of paragraph (n) of
this certification be included in the award documents for
all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts,
subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall
certify and disclose accordingly.
(o) it will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by:
1. publishing a statement notifying employees that the
unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing,
possession, or use of a controlled substance is
prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the
actions that will be taken against employees for
violation of such prohibition.
Establishing a drug -free awareness program to inform
employees about;
a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
b. The City's policy of maintaining a drug -free
workplace;
C. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and
enployee assistance programs; and
t27^ ,
d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees
for drug abuse violations occurring in the
workplace.
3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged
in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the
statement required by paragraph 1.
4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by
paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the
grant, the employee will:
a. abide by the terms of the statement; and
b. notify the employer of any criminal drug statute
conviction for a violation occurring in the
workplace no later than five days after such
conviction.
5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days
after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an
employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such
conviction. Employers of convicted employees must
provide notice, including position title, to every grant
officer or other designee on whose grant activity the
convicted employee was working, unless the federal agency
has designated a central point for the receipt of such
notices. Notice shall include the identification
number(s) of each affected grant:
6. Taking one of the following actions, within thirty
calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph
4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted.
(a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such
an employee, up to and including termination,
consistent with the requirements of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or
(b) Requiring such employee to participate
satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes
by a federal, state or local health, law
enforcement, or other appropriate agency,
7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a
drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below, the
site(s) for the performance of work done in connection
with the specific grant:
t%
�3D
Place of Performance:
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739
Check X if there are workplaces on file that are not
identified here; and
(p) It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with
other applicable laws.
�3�
RESOLUTION NO. j - 17,
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF
COKW17NITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF
FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1992 -93.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, is an Entitlement City under the reg,:lations governing the
Community Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, notice of the availability of funds for eligible projects
was published in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and posted in
community locations; and
WHEREAS, the City staff has received proposals for projects and
programs from various organizations; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 1992, the City Council heard public testimony
and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Block
Grant Program for the 1992 -93 fiscal years and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the potential environmental
impacts of each project and has reviewed all possible alternatives and
mitigation measures included in each; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves and takes the following actions:
1. Adopt the Final Statement of Community Development
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds (Final Statement) for
program year 1992 -93 and make all findings, determinations,
and certifications, and adopt all policies therein; and
2. Select the following projects and programs to be funded out
of the City's 1992 -93 Community Development Block Grant
award:
Project /Program Amount
Administration
$ 92,450
SW Cncamonga Streets
147,130
Sidewalk Grinding
5,940
Wheel Chair Ramps
6,936
Home Improvement
227,292+
Oldtimers Foundation
5,000
Graffiti Removal
10,412
Fair Housing
8,476
Landlord/Tenant
7,628
i .32
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
FINAL STATEMENT OF CDBG 1992 -93
June 3, 1992
Page 2
Project /Program Amount
Neighborhood Center 6,410
Fair Housing Testing 2,814
House of Ruth 4,561
($2,561 reprogram from Sr. Share)
Homeless Outreach 10,000
Contingency 31,770
Total $566,819
These totals include an estimated $13,260 in program
income. Program income is received from repayment of
deferred loans made from participants of the Home
Improvement Program. Funds received will continue to be
used to provide housing rehabilitation for lower income
single family homeowners. The amount is an approximation
of what might be received. Income received will not be
known until the end of the fiscal year on June 30, 1992.
3. Determine that the proposed projects are the most
environmentally desirable and that adequate mitigation has
been included in each to avoid significant environmental
impacts under the National Environmental Protection Act
(NEPA)1 and
4. Determine that all of the proposed projects are exempt from
environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines); and
5. Authorize the Mayor to sign the application for the City's
program year 1992 -93 Community Development Block Grant
Entitlement Allocation, to submit the Final Statement and
Amendments thereto, and all understandings and assurances
contained therein, and to act in connection with the
submission of the Final Statement and to provide such
additional information as may he required.
133
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
i -,
r5
DATE: June 3, 1992
TJ: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, APCP, City Manager
:ROM: Brad Puller, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 -
JAMES PAGE - Aop eal of the Planning Commission's denial of
a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for
an existing 103,552 square _foot indoor wholesale /retail
conmiercial use located within the General Industrial
District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan
at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 262 -28.
RECONNENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of the
expansion of hours for Conditional Use Par.ait 91 -03 through adoption of
the attached Resolution.
DACEGIDI/tlD: On June 19, 1991, the City Council approved Industrial
Specific Plan Amendment 91 -03 to conditionally permit Indoor
Wholesale /Retail Commercial Uses within the industrial area. On June
27, 1991, the Planning Commission considered a request to allow the
first such use, Carnival Malls, to locate within an existing research,
and development center. During the public hearing, the Planning
Commission expressed concern about the proposed hours of operation and
potential on -site parking conflicts with other site users. After much
discussion, the Commission was able to make the findings to support the
project based on the fact that there was going to be no impacts to
existing and future site users due to off -peak hours of operation for
the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use. Finally, the proposal was
consistent with the spirit and intent of Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 91 -03. To ensure compatibility of the on -site uses, the use
was limited to the following hours of operation:
Monday through Friday - 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Incidental stacking of
merchandise for vendors and office hours for the management team - Not
Open to the Public)
Friday 5:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. Retail Sales
Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Retail Sales
Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Retail Sales
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE
June 3, 1992
Page 2
Following the opening of the Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use on
November 1, 1991, the applicant submitted a modification request on
December 11, 1991. The modification to Condit -onal Use Permit 91 -C3
requested a-, expansion of permitted uses, operation on holidays, and the
expansion of hours of operation on Fridays (referred to as Items, A, B,
and C within the attached reports). On April 8, 1992, after conducting
a public hearing, the Commission conditionally approved the applicant's
request to expand the uses and hours of operation during holidays (Parts
A and B), but dented the applicant's request to expand the hours of
operation to include Fridays, from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The
Commission found that they could not support the applicant's request
because of potential negative impacts to existing and future site users.
ANALYSIS: In addition to compatibility with surrounding land uses, the
Commission could not support the project because of parking issues. The
Development Code requirement for the indoor wholesale /retail. commnercial
use is 1 parking space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of
the Conditional Use Permit review, the Planning Commission may allow 1
space per 150 square feet subject to the submittal and review of a
Parking study. The parking study submitted by the applicant
demonstrated that adequate parking facilities would exist for the
proposed use at a parking ratio of 1 space per 150 square feet on
weekends only (See Exhibit "I"). A total of 691 parking stalls would be
required for the indoor wholesale. /retail commercial use. The total
amount of parking required for the entire industrial center is 875
parkinq stalls. A total of 760 stalls have been provided which means
there would be a deficit of 119 parking stalls with all uses in
operation at the same time on weekdays. Because the applicant proposed
to operate on weekends only, the Commission was assured there would be
no narking impacts to other tenants within the center and therefore,
were consistent with the Development Code requirements.
In addition to the above information in the parking study, additional
information on a shared parking study for the entire shopping center was
provided. The Development Code standards assume a flat peak parking
requirement in direct contrast to a shared parking study. with
information provided by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), the study sought
to demonstrate that adequate parking would exist for all users on
weekdays as well as weekends. These figures, under the shared parking
concept, assume that the uses within the industrial center operate with
differing peak hour demands. The reasoning being that with differing
peak hour demand, parking requirements would be. less than those
identified within the Development Code. The Planning Commission
rejected the use of shared parking in this situation because (1) most of
the leaseable space is vacant making it difficult to define the types of
uses and their parking needs: and (2) the indoor wholesale /retail
commercial use is a "new animal" for which ULI has no available parking
data.
135-
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
June 3, 1992
_age 3
As a result_ of the findings identified above, the Planning Commission
denied the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to
include .Fridays. Copies of the Planning Commission Staff Reports and
Minutes are attached. The Commission then - ontinued tic item to the
April 22, 1952 meeting and adonted a Resolution of Denial at said
hearing.
Respect submitt
/ Brad Du r
City Planner
BL':ALH:js
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Exhibit "E"
Exhibit "F"
Exhibit "G"
Exhibit "H"
Exhibit "I"
Exhibit "J"
Applicant's Letter of Appeal
Site Plan
Staff Report, April 22, 1992
Resolution of Denial
Draft Minutes, April 22, 1992
Staff Report April 8o 1992
Minutes April 8, 1992
Staff Report, March 25, 1992
Parking Requirements
Applicants Original Modification Letter
1Yp
T
A
� aiwqut pat
PMAY 4 1992
�- arr:.easam
may 1. .>
Brad Bulier: Crty Planner
Box
Rancho Curamnnaa. Caiifornia 9i /3U
„ea_ mr. Bolter
We are spree I ing the Planning Department of the City of Rancno
Cucamonga .recision adopted April 22. 1992 for the taiiowjrg
reasons.
1; It l.s correct that we originally asked for IKEEKEND
USE, However we also asked for FRIDAY NIGHTS and
were approved Ior USE from PN to 9:UU FM.
2) Prior to our approval, but AFTER OUR APPLICATION
WAS FILED, a 'SHARED PARKING STUDY" -a s required by
the PLANNING COMMISSION as additional information
for the approval of our CUP during oar FIRST
HEARING. When, that SHARED PARKING STUDY" was
completed it showed THAT WE COULD OPERATE UNDER
CITY APPROVED REQUIREMENTS" during the ENTIRE WEEK
with CONFLICT WITH THE OTHER USERS IN OUR
CO ,r LEX" .
At the time of our ORIGINAL CUP APPLIr CATION we were
under the impression that under your EXISTING
REQUIREMENTS we WOULD CONFLICT with the rest of the
complex. When we found that we DID NOT CONFLICT,
IT WAS "TOO LATE" to amend our CUP APPLICATION and
START THE WHOLE PROCESS OVER AGAIN. Due to the
Complex nature of our application and the necessary
time delays needed to COLLECT the FULL INFORMATION,
it put us under severe TIME PRESSURES from the
OWNER or we WOULD HAVE REAPPLIED! That and a
CLARIFICATION of our EXISTING CUP 1s why we are
REAFPLING NOW!
.1 Under Paragraph 2(d) & (e) of the DENIAL, the
findings that It CONFLICTS with the OTHER SITE
USERS ARE INCORRECT,
137 15XH' leer 1A�1
THIS 13 CONFIRMED BY:
(a) THE ORIGINAL SHARED PARKING STUDY", prepared
by Austin - Founts, Which Was the basis OS Our
ORIGINAL APPROVAL for our CUP. This SHOWS IT DOES
NOT CONFLICT "WHILE EVEN ALLOWING FOR AN ADDITIONAL
lUS RESERVE FACTOR "!
(b) "THE FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA'S "OWN" PLANNING STAFF. )SEE STAFF
REPORT)!
4) If the conditions under a(d) & (e) are INCORRECT.
as they are, than the CONCLUSIONS under Paragraph 3
of the DENIAL are INCORRECT and SHOULD BE REVERSED
and our NEW APPLICATION, as "RECOMMENDED BY THE
PLANNING STAFF" be "APPROVED"!
3i
C6 rely,
J tes P g
r e
arn'vat Malls
JRP /la
} �g ie1? ";Or �� I
£Y441alT "A'.'Z
lecs-mter 1Q, .'i'ii
Au na -Li- a Hernandez. Assistant Planner
ianning epartment
itv of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, Calitornia � u JU
Dear Anna -Lisa:
After carstul consideration of our operation and Its imract on
tntm City of Rancho Cucamonga. Carnival Malls is applying to the
r fanning epartment o y
� the of Rancho Cucamonga for a
MODIFICATION of its existino CUP at 11SJU SIXTH Street.
are requesting the �o.iowing
inclusion of Personal Service Sales in addition to New
Froducts Sales. These Personal Services typically include.
nut are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers,
real estate sales, personal care, ; beauty or nail care
photography studios and other activities typical of a
personal service nature.
Z; Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL
HOLIDAYS, such as; NEW YEARS DAY, VALENTINE'S DAY, LINCOLN'S
8 WASHINHTON'S BIRTHDAY, ST. PATRICK'S DAY, ARMED FORCES
DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY.
COLUMBUS DAY. UNITED NATION'S DAY, HALLOWEEN, VETERANS DAY.
THANKSGIVING, the day after THANKSGIVING and the week before
CHRISTMAS.
J; Extention of our HOURS of Operation on FRIDAYS to Start
at m ou AM. instead of S:UU PM, and End at 8:0U PM.
We are requesting this for the following reasons:
11 Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE in our LAND USE
SUB -AREA. It is also a PERMITTED USE in the ADJACENT OFFICE
BUILDING on Site. It will be a MINOR portion of the Total
Use of the Vendors in our facility. In most other cities it
is a PERMITTED COMMERCIAL USE. It is also part of the
EXISTING USE in the MAJOR MALLS In the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Z; Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS means EXISTING TENANTS
In the other buildings on site, during those Holidays, WILL
BE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS
TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on these Holdays for the same
reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during the WEER
BEFORE CHRISTMAS in that this is a period when people take
Vacations and business in our area is generally light. ALL
COMPARABLE FACILITIES CHARGE "EXTRA RENTAL" which means some
of our Tenants Will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some will be
tied up in FULL TIME JOBS ELSEWHERE. This will REDUCE ou
TOTAL occupancy, customer Lrattic and overall parking neess.
I�
ExN re IT 1/4 "3
31 PARKING STUDIES DONE t ON COMPARABLE FACILITIES ) IN OUR
INITIAL PARKING STUDY, SHOW THAT FRIDAY IS A "LIGHT RETAIL
DAY ". We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY is not a FAMILY
SHOPPING DAY. In addition. a number of our TENANTS are
EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS.
This is the reason that FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY" in
all comparable facilities.
As per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done for the CUP. TABLE I.
ALTERNATE #'. WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN
SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TIME PERIOD ".
Ot ALL the requirements for parking availability the Limits
under ALTERNATE F3 are the most RESTRICTIVE, HOWEVER FOR THE
TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS.
IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS
MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A
YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE MAKING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR THE FUTURE
NOW!
Thank you again for your kind help.
Sincerely,
,James Page
for Carnival Malls
JRP /la
14b
E >4+±1 a lT '�4'i 4
Anti, 14. 133:;
Mr. Brad Buii'.. _ r_anner
F!annin.g Department
Cltv Of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130
Dear Mr. Buller;
in regards to the Planning COmmisslor action on April Uth 1992,
MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -UJ a number or items
need clarification.
A. We have requested exnansion of our hours to include
FRIDAYS. It is believed that that is a PROFITABLE move on
our part. That is Just not the case. CARNIVAL INDOOR STREET
FAIRE insures ONLY COST BY EXPANDING TO FRIDAY. What occured
WAS OUR TENANTS, residents of RANCHO CUCAMONGA requested that
they be allowed to operate on FRIDAY as well as SATURDAY &
SUNDAY. The reason that it is important to them is that a
number of them LOST THEIR JOBS.
jap
When WE appe
lied for FRIDAY NIGHT, SATURDAY & SUNDAY in our
original application we felt as we do now that economically
that was'Vto OUR BENEFIT. We still believe SO; However. wno
knew the present depression was at hand. Retailers need help
today, especially ours who are Just starting out and can't
Pay HIGH RENTS. We nave done our part by reducing rents by
over bUE to help them.
As we stated In the meeting; "OUR HOURS OF OPERATION "DO NOT"
INCLUDE ANY FRIDAY HOURS OF OPERATION, PRESENTLY, EVEN THOUGH
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. If we were looking to expand our
operation why did wi CANCEL FRIDAY NIGHT OPERATIONY EVERY
HOUR WE ARE OPEN COSTS US MONEY. WHAT PERSONAL MOTIVATION DO
WE HAVE TO EXPAND OUR HOURS': TO LOSE MORE MONEY
Starf acknowledges that we can operate with no problems
regarding traffic and parking. It is acknowledged that we
can be stopped from expanding to other days. Understand we
are requesting NOT ON OUR BEHALF, but on bahalf of your
RESIDENTS to allow a Friday Weekday Operation ONLY. We are
prepared to enter Into any type of agreement you wish to
Insure our compliance. Your positive action is not
beneficial to us, but can go along way to helping those
People who are trying to economically survive. Please look
into your hearts and help them!
Sincerely,
lyl
James Page
WESTICOR INCORP, it's President
Mach .39i
Mr. Alex vicencio. Civi: Engineer
P. . BOX GU/
Rancho Cucamonga. California 91129
Lear Mr. vicencio;
We are applying to the Planning Department of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for permission to use the Existing Facilities located
at 1153U SIXTH Street as a RETAIL MALL for weekend use. The
following is a report on Its impact on traffic and parking for
the property.
Our Development, a MINI -MALL is a commercial use. AS such, it
best fits under Category / of your "LAND USE TRIP PATE SUMMARY ".
This is described as "REGIONAL COMMERCIAL". Tne Average Customer
Is coming tar Entertainment and shopping. The availability of
merchandise from APPROXIMATELY 2UU SMALL STORES 1 AVERAGE SIZE
2UU - 4UU sq. it.). With the USE of KIDDY RIDES and TELEVISION,
lncludir,g both Sporting Events. for Adults, and Cartoons for the
children a PROLONGED stay at our MALL will occur for the FAMILY.
It is quite possible that our TRUE A.D.T. will he more likely
that at a GOLF COURSE, HEALTH CLUB or PARK because or the ACTUAL
STAY OF OUR CUSTOMER; certainly more like a REGIONAL MALL because
of Its Entertainment Facilities.
Our HOURS of OPERATION are 3:PM - 9:FM FRIDAY, IU:AM - e:PM
SATURDAY and lU:AM - 6:PM SUNDAY.
PHASE 1, has SU,000 sq. ft. GROSS and '16,000 sq. it. of RETAIL
SALES SPACE. PHASE Z has 103,124 sq. ft. of GROSS SPACE and
..�,UUU sq. it. of RETAIL SALES SPACE. PHASE 2 applies to the
ENTIRE OPERATION.
Our Advertising is geared to the INLAND EMPIRE AREA. We are
using primarily RADIO and direct mail. The advertising marketing
information shows OUR CUSTOMERS will come from the entire
surrounding MARKET AREA. This means our MAIN traffic corridors
are along the 1U & 1S FREEWAYS, exiting at HAVEN, MILLIKEN 6 4th
STREET'S and along 6th Street, running both East & West.
SECONDARY or LOCAL traffic from the East will take FOOTHILL.
ARROW HIGI(WAY and 4th STREETS West only slightly impacting the
area. However, we have the UNIQUE. ABILITY TO DIRECT TRAFFIC
ACCESS TO OUR SITE. Our advertising can be varied so that we CAN
EDUCATE the CUSTOMER as to WHAT ROUTES to TAKE to ACCESS OUR
`',L_
EYE IBr-( iAriG
SITE. We can therefore CHANGE or MITIGATE TRAFFIC PATTERNS
THROUGH OUR ADVERTISING to SUIT CHANGING TRAFFIC DEMANDS. That
Is UNIQUE to any business.
Our traffic will occur ON WEEKENDS, when BUSINESS TRIES on these
corridors are either vastly reduced or NON EXISTENT. We should
therefore add little or none to the OVERALL TRAFFIC PATTERNS and
even FALL WELL UNDER THE PROJECTED "WEEKLY" TRAFFIC STUDIES for
our IMMEDIATE area.
Our area Is NOT RESIDENTIAL in nature and was PLANNED for and has
SUPERIOR TRAFFIC CIRCULATION as well as "OFFSITE PARKING ". The
RESIDENTIAL in the MARKET AREA Is ADEQUATELY REMOVED from this
location. Within OUR MARKET AREA, this site, is located In a
BUFFER AREA where traffic is DIRECTED TO THE FREEWAYS.
By locating on this site we RAVE REMOVED the NEGATIVE TRAFFIC
IMPACT our operation might cause in some OTHER RETAIL COMMERCIAL
AREA and mitigate the WEEKLY BUSINESS TRAFFIC CONGESTION of over
100,UUU sq ft of space which, in the future, will never
negatively Impact OUR AREA AGAIN.
Sincerely,
James Page
Carnival Mails
ENC:
JRP /la
V-13
,I. JTGiBi1: "�';L�71�i I.ff�� 'U'1' "I" •���� I �i�ibil�l- `Illi'illl`I "Ill,�l'�1 ";�
BUILDING' BUILO(NG I
2A
103.550 SO F
J; x800 SO F*
I, 4 fI BUILDING II BUILDING]
2B n I - ltl]0fl 5(1 F1 \ \\
26 705 50 FT .� I �
A.1 iLQnII,IIIQILII LlQ lll Il Ll LfILWIW
Site viall
" I
O
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
co PLANNING Q VISION
iL �,
I
% �s2.
ul I Y ur NANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
7�
DATE: ;pril 22, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -D3 - JAMES PAGE -
Resolution of Denial for a request to expand the hours of
operation on Fridays for an existing 103,522 square foot
indoor wholesale /retail commercial use located within the
General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
ABSTRACT: On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed the
applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays
from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m., within the existing Carnival Malls site. After
reviewing staff's report and taking public testimony, the Planning
Commission could not support the applicant's request due to potential
cumulative parking and compatibility issues with other site users and
directed staff to return with a Resolution of Denial at the next
available Planning Commission Consent Calendar. Before you tonight is
the requested Resolution of Denial..
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the
applicant's request for hours of operation on Fridays through adoption
of the attached Resolution of Denial.
Resp ly sub
Bra idle
City Planner
BB:ALH /ifs
Attachment: Resolution of Denial
N5
RESOLUTION `:O.
i. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C:T OF RA:1CH0
CJ- .IMONGA, CAL:FORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 91 -03, PART FOR THE EXPANSIOON OF THE HOURS
OF O'PERATI'ON: 0:: FRIDAYS, LOCATED iN THE GENERAI, INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT, AND MAKING rINCINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-
26-29.
A. Recitals.
!i) ,Tames Paue has filed an application for a modification to
Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -03 as described in the title of this.
ReFc bat ion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit modification request 1s referred to as "the appiication."
(ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day
of March and the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of-
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992.
;iii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed
the proposal and staff's presentation and received public testimony. At the
conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission directed staff to
prepare a Resolution of Denial for their meeting of April 22, 1992.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
Earth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above- referenced public hearing on February 26, March 25, and April 8,
1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property Located at 11530 Sixth
Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.33 feet and
is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760
parking spaces; and
(b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General
industrial.
1�1� f�Y-H ieiT "o"
PLANNING COM2MISSID:1 RESDLLTIDN NO. ,„ -„
11,00. D CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAM.ES PAGE
April 22, 1992
Page 2
c) The Indoor Wholesale /Retail Conmerci_al Use is located within a
General Industrial zone Subarea 11 of the industrial Area Specific Plan. The
General industrial zone was intended to accommodate a wide range of light to
tedium manufactureng and wholesale, storage and distribution uses. Typically,
administrative office, professional, and indoor wholesale /retail commercial
uses are not allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. The primary
finding in permitting the use to locate within the Research and Development
Industrial Center was the fact that there would not be any conflict with the
hours of operation of the general industrial users within the site with off-
set hours of operation on weekends only. The ancillary nature of the indoor
wholesale /retail commercial use on weekends only was found to be consistent
with the original intent of the General Industrial zone. This proposal to
expand the hours of operation directly conflicts with the intent of the
General industrial zone of the Industrial Specific plan and would conflict
with on -site business operations.
(d) The original approval of the application was based on the fact
that the application would operate during different hours of operation of
other users within the center, thereby, minimizing all potential impacts to
other current site and future businesses. With the current proposal, hours of
operation on Fridays from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. would conflict with the
hours of operation of other site users, and adversely impact those businesses.
(e) The proposed hours of operation would conflict with the
utilization of parking facilities for other users within the site.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
fb) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific
Plan.
4. eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
N-1 6M151 1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. j -- --
MOD. TO CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAMES PAGE
April 22, 1992
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APR! -, 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RP1CHO CUCAMONGA
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the :ity of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and -
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of April 1992, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ly6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
April 22, 1992
Chairman McNiel tailed the Regular Meeting of the rity of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council
Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNrel,
John Melcher, Peter Tolstoy,
Wendy Vallette
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal
Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Ralph
Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Anna -Lisa Hernandez,
Assistant Planner; Barbara Rrall, Assistant Engineer;
Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner; Scott Murphy,
Associate Planner; Shelley Petrelli, Planning Division
Secretary: Steve Ross, Assstant Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that Items G and I be discussed at the
same time since they are related.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously carried, to adopt
the minutes of March 25, 1992.
Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Melcher, carried 4- 0 -0 -1, ( Vallette
abstained) to adopt the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of April 2, 1992.
14 °I
DRAFT EXMl E1'r "E
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MODIFTCA:IOR T CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - Sl MES PAGE - Resolution, of
Dentall for a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for an
existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /reta!i commcr vial use
located within the General Industrial Distri (Subarea 11) of the
industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 262 -28.
(Continued from April 8, 1992.)
James Page, Carnival Malls, requested Item A to pulled for discussion..
Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner, gave a brief Summary of her nrevicus
staff report.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
James Page, Carnival Malls, 6221 Warner Dr., Los Angeles, stated he wished to
address the Commission because he felt the Commission may have gotten the
wrong inpression from the last meeting regarding the reasons why they had
asked for expanded hours of operation on Fridays. He pointed out that it was
the tenants who had asked for the expanded hours. He stated that the concept
behind this na11 is to help the small business person get started. He
commented that the City of Los Angeles is opposed to swap meets in their city,
but they are now promoting this concept for the same reasons as Carnival
Malls. With the current economic situation, he stated they are very concerned
about what will happen to all the people being laid off from their jobs; his
company stands ready to help by retraining these people. He remarked that
facilities of this type are extremely important. He stated that their
organization is similar to Fedco, which is not considered a swap meet, and
Carnival Malls does not consider themselves a swap meet either.
Chairman McNiel, asked why they were requesting Friday daytime hours when they
are not utilizing Friday evening hours.
Mr. Page replied that they voluntarily chose not to utilize evening hours on
Fridays because it was not economically sound for the vendors. He stated that
the vendors were requesting Friday daytime hours because more women shop by
themselves on Fridays.
Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He asked for comments from the
Commission.
Commissioner Melcher stated that the previous approval for this type of use at
this location was based, in part, on the fact that the mall would be open
during hours other businesses would be closed. He stated that the remainder
of the project is vacant currently, but be was concerned that sufficient
parking would not be available when the project becomes fully operational. He
felt that, in spite of the applicant's sincere request, it would be
inappropriate to allow this extension of operating hours because of the
potential parking problems.
I5,C)
Planning Commission Minutes all•- April 22, 1992
DRAFT
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Ccr.,missioner Toistoy agreed with Com=. ssioner M.elcher, but he added it would
nose a much 'larger problem than a conflict within the complex; it would Pose a
conflict within the entire industrial area because of the additional traffic
that would be caused by their weekday operations.
Commcss.iorex Chitiea concurred with the co: —tints made by Commissioners Melcher
and Toistoy.
MOTION: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried 5 -0 -0, to
adopt the Resolution of Denial.
Motion rarriad by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, M7c1IEL, MELCHEP., TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried
k 4 F 4 t
B.�SIGN REVIEW 14407 -1 - LEWIS HOMES - The design review of bull
e tions and detailed site plan for a previously approved ten ve
trac consisting of 13 single family homes on 1.3 acres of Ian the
Medium dential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) of a Terra
Vista Pla Community, located on the west side of M.ountal ew Drive,
south of Base , a Road - APN: 227 - 751 -15,
C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR. 1'FTIVE TRACT 14365 - LEWIS H011E0The design review
of buil di r.g elevation Wand detailed site plan fo previously aoproved
tentative tract map consNing of 41 single f homes on 5.85 acres of
land in the Medium Residential District (8-10A welting units per acre) of
the Terra Vista Planned CommuiRp loca tq/ on the south side of Mountain
View Drive west of Milliken Avent A 1077 - 091 -36.
Sa ry Cockcroft, Lewis Homes, 7156
N M ain, Upland, requested Items H, C
be pulled for discussion.
Chairman McNiel opened the c hearing.
Chairman McNiel asked Cockcroft what he wishedss.
Mr. Cockcroft r ed he wanted an opportunity to clarify me of the design
review comme made at the last Design Review meeting and 1so wanted to
have Cond' n No. 15 of the Standard Conditions deleted b se neither
project a homeowner association. project.
Br Buller, City Planner, asked the applicant for specific clarificat on
th Design Review issues.
1s I
Planning Commission Minutes 14, April 22, 1992 q
DRAFT
ExWtetT E-S
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
1.1l i yr RH Nl_ nu 1. l'l,.p ➢'1V.V V.Y
STAFF REPORT
and Members of the Planing Comission
FROM: grad Buller, City Planner
3y: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant_ Planner
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE -
request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the
permitted uses 'within an existing 103,522 square foot indoor
wholesale /retail commercial use 'located within the Ceneral
,ndustrial District {Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -20.
(Continued from March 25, 1992.)
Addendum Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit 91 -03
(Carnival Malls).
ABSTRACT: The applicant has submitted two letters (nee Exhibits "A" 6
"S "), which provide new information addressing the March 25, 1992, staff
report regarding parking, security, and business licensing issues. The
applicant has also requested that the Planning Commission consider the
additional use of an outdoor swap meet use within the project site to be
Permitted in conjunction with a Temporary Use Permit.
ANALYSIS:
A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: In addition to those items identified
within the March 25, 1992, staff report, the applicant is also
requesting that jewelry repair services be permitted within the
Carnival Malls project.
Staff Comments: Retail sales of jewelry and wat ^ches is allowed
under the Indoor wholesale /Retail Commercial use category. The
jewelry repair service could be listed under the Convenience Sales
and Service category within the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
Convenience Sales and Services are permitted within the subarea,
wit1h an approved Conditional Use Permit from the Planning
Corcm :saion. The use will not adversely impact the existing or
future uses within the project, as it will be ancillary to the
primary use of retail sales.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the applicant's request to permit the jewelry repair service
w Lthir the Carnival Mall project site. Y4 QQ
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF P.:PORT
MOD. TO CUP 91 -03 - Y MES PACE
Apr,! 8, 1992
Page 2
.y• Extension of Hours of Operation Zrunna 'ioiidays: %o new information
has been submitted by applicant. Staff's recommendation is
unchanged.
Exoanded Hours of Operation, on Fridays: The applicant has requested
to expand the hours of operation on Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.
Staf.` Comments: Originally, staff based its recommendation on
inaccurate information discussed within the shared parking study
submitted by the applicant. The Development Code parking
requirement for the Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use is 1
space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of the
Conditional Use Permit review, the Planning Comirission may allow 1
space per 150 square feet subject to the submittal and review of a
parking study.
The shared parking study indicates that a total of 691 spaces will
I
e necessary for all uses operating at the same time on weekdays.
This figure is based , the typical demand within similar centers
and includes a 10 percent buffer. This figure also assumes that a
ma)ority of the uses do not operate at their peak demands at the
same time. A total of 760 parking stalls have been provided.
Therefore, there are enough parking spaces for all existinq and
future tenants within the center, as determined within the shared
parking study. Operation of the facility during weekdays would not
negatively impact other users.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the shared parking concept for the project, and allow the
applicant to operate on Fridays.
D. Other Issues: In the previous review, staff noted issues relating
to business licensing and security .`or the Carnival Malls site. The
applicant has contacted licensing staff and is working diligently to
rectify those issues. The applicant clarified that they have
security personnel and are in compliance with this requirement.
Conditions had been placed in the previous staff report and on the
resolutions to ensure continued compliance. In raising these
issues, staff felt that the Planning Commission, in its review of
the expansion of the proposed hours of operation, should be aware of
these concerns.
F. Use Determination: On March 26, 1992, staff received another letter
from the applicant (see Exhibit "A ") requesting that we consider
locating the existing General Dynamics weekend swap meet (an outdoor
swap meet use) within the Carnival Malls site. The General Dynamics
property is currently for sale and the operators of the outdoor
electronics swap meet are seeking an alternative site for their use.
IS 3
EXN 1a3K 11 � " —I
PLANNING COMM:SSION STAFF -REPORT
MOD. TO CJP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
April 8, 1992
Page. 3
The applicant has requested that the Planning Como ssion per out the
applicant to conduct the proposed indoor /outdoor swap meet use on a
trial basis through the Temporary Use Permit. process. Tie applicant
is requestinc that the outdoor portion of the use be permitted to
operate one Saturday a month.
Staff Comments: Currently, the outdoor swap meet use is permitted
Only within the Heavy Industrial zone, Subarea 15, of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan. Allowing this use on a regular basis within the
site would require a Land Use Amendment to the Industrial Area
Specific Plan and another modification to the original Conditional
Use Permit.
A Temporary Use Permit serves to control and regulate land use
activities of a temporary nature which might negatively effect the
public health, safety, and welfare for uses such as parking
lot /sidewalk sales, christmas tree lots, etc. These events are
limited to three times annually, not to exceed a maximum of 3
consecutive days per event within each center (see Exhibit "C ").
Staff cannot support the proposed Temporary Use Permit on a monthly
basis for the following reasons:
The Development Code allows each site a maximum of three
Temporary Use Permits to be issued per site, annually. The
applicant is requesting that these outdoor swap meets occur on
a regular monthly basis.
2. Outdoor swap meets are not permitted within General Industrial
zones.
The Industrial Area Specific Plan clearly states that all
businesses are to be conducted within an enclosed building (see
Exhibit "D ").
Staff has numerous concerns in combining an indoor /outdoor swap meet
use within a General Industrial site. There may be CUMIlative
impacts which might negatively affect other site users. Aesthetics,
parking, business licensing, and site maintenance are just a few
potential problems. Although the applicant is requesting a trial
basis of the indoor /outdoor soap meet use, staff feels that a one-
time occurrence may not be sufficient enough to predict all the
cumulative impacts, particularly since the site is not fully leased
or developed.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin as a public hearing, the project site was posted, and
notices were sent to all properties within 300 feet of the project site.
�5� r- Y+I817' � '-L
PLANNING COMMISSION S'PAFF REPORT
MOD. TO C,T 91 -03 - JAMES ?AVE
.AOri1 8, 1992
pane
RECCMMENDAT ION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Fars A, H, and C, '. i-- modi£_catrons through adoption of the attached
ReSOlut.ons (separate Resolutions are provided for your convenience).
If ti;e Planning Commission cannot support any of the proposed
m, +difi cations, then staff should be directed to prepare Resolutions of
Denial for adoption on your nest consent calendar agenda. Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the proposed
monthly outdoor electronic swap meet is a prohibited use for Subarea 11
through adoption of the attached Resolution.
Ressppe ully itte ,
/b /
rad / fuller
City Planner
RB:ALH /ifs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter dated March 25, 1992
Exhibit "H" - Applicant's Letter dated March 27, 1992
Exhibit "C" - Temporary Use Permit Requirements
Exhibit "D" - Industrial Area Specific Plan
"Condition of Uses"
Exhibit "E" - Staff Report dated March 25, 1992
Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Uses
Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include
Holidays
Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include
Fridays
Resolution of Denial for Outdoor Swap Meet. Use
1s5s irKHiarr "F =3
Mr. Thompson replied that it will remain only as a link to the east.
Heating no further testimony, Chairman McN:e'_ closed the punlic hearing
Commissioner Chitiea remarked that she was cot in favpr of the pro-.ect because
it is ad-acent to residential development. She felt that if the Commission
approved the project, all improvements should be made up front.
Commissioner Melcher remarked that he had been with the developer at the time
the policies were originally adopted, and he thought he knew the reasons for
the adoption. He felt the conditions anould be revised because he did not
feel they are within in the spirit of the policies.
Commissioner Valletta noted that she originally opposed the project as a
whole. She felt that the location on Base Line and Rochester will generate
additional traffic on Rochester aecsseitating too street improvements down to
Church. She 4140 felt the atom drains should be constructed in light of the
experience during recent storms.
Commissioner Tolstoy agreed with Commissioner Chitiea that all improvements
should be made up front.
Chairman McNial noted that he did not think a street should be narrowed 'mid-
block. He supported staff's position of requiring the improvements.
Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Tolstoy, t0 issue a Negative
Declaration and adopt the resolution, approving Tentative parcel Map 13987.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCHIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIRA
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried
E. MODIFICATION TO CONBTTION, CIS[ PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMU PROF - A request to
modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an
existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /retail commercial use
located within the General Industrial oietrict (Subarea 11) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
Continued from March 25, 1992.1
Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Melchor asked it the additional uses would require individual
conditional use perm Lts, so that each time one of the small business*/ wanted
to locate there, it would have to appear before the Planning Commission.
Brad Buller, City Planner, replied as proposed they would not.
Planning commlasion Minutes L4l April 8, 1992
I5� if
f5144 flu I A
COMMISSiOner M.elCher fee that .f the Ccam_ssion agreed t at one shared
parking theory works for Friday eperaticns, the applicant would then request
seven- day - per -week operations.
Dan Co_eman, Principal Planner, noted the shared parking study could be used
to demcnstrace that sufficient parking is available seven days per week, but
the ccnditional age permit would limit the operation to whatever times the
Commission dictated.
Commissioner Melcher questioned why the applicant was only asking for all day
Fridays, instead of all week long. He noted that concerns had been raised in
the previous staff report regarding adherence to business license requirements
and adequacy of security personnel. He asked how these problems had been
addressed.
Me. Hernandez responded that the applicant had not advised why they were only
requesting Friday hours of operation. She noted that since the initial staff
report, the applicant had worked with planning staff and business license
staff to ensure that vendors are properly licensed. She said the City
Attorney had informed staff that the conditions had been tightened ag much as
legally possible to secure compliance. She said that business license staff
hag been visiting the site on weekends to take applications. Me. Hernando.*
observed that the applicant had dismissed the hired security service one week
after commencing operations and had hired their own security force without
informing staff who these security people are. She noted that the applicant
has indicated they will submit a listing of their security personnel.
Chairman McNiel asked if it would be legal for the outdoor swap meet to take
place at the General Dynamics location.
Mr. Buller said it appears the use started after adoption of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan which prohibits the use. Ms noted there had been
discussions at City Council and the Council was aware of the use and had
indicated it was not a concern to them in its present location. He said
therefore staff had not pursued enforcement.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
James Page, Carnival Malls, 11530 Sixth street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they
had diligently pursued working with the City to address any problems that have
come up. He stated they were trying to work with staff with regards to
business licensing. He remarked that some vendors had only operated for one
weekend and had therefor* not followed through with obtaining a license. He
stated that the City Council had discussed the outdoor swap meet and the City
Council members seemed to feel it was working well. He said the person who
ran the swap meet had approached him and requested that the swap meet be moved
to Carnival Malls since the General Dynamics site was being sold. He felt the
swap meet could be better regulated if it was moved to his site. He noted
that they are currently selling food and using portable toilets at the General
Dynamics site. He noted that the swap meet operates from 6;00 to 11:00 a.m.
while Carnival Malls opens at 10:00 a.m., so there would be an overlap of
Planning Commission Minutes t.&T April B, 1992
15l £y4+1.&T "K `�
time. He suggested that a temporary use permit be granted to allow the swap
aeet to operate a maximum of three ..mes to be sure things 'would •,rock
satisfactorily. He said that 'would allow them to make ad7ustmente as
necessary to mitigate any problems that arise.
commissioner To_stoy asked if the electronics swap meet deals :n both new and
used ,merchandise.
Mr. Page responded that they do.
Commissioner Tolatoy noted that when the original conditional use permit for
Carnival Malls was approved only new items were to be sold.
Mr. Buller confirmed that was correct.
Commissioner Tolatoy noted that if the electronics swap meet was going to sell
second hand equipment, it would hot meet the original conditional use permit
c cnditions.
Mr. Page suggested the swap meet could be restricted to selling only new
equipment.
Commissioner Tolatoy felt a great preponderance of the electronic swap meat
trade is in second hand items. He felt such a restriction would limit the
swap meet to a point where it would not be successful.
Mr. Page remarked that was why they had suggested allowing the swap meat on a
temporary basis so that mitigations could be proposed to solve the problems
that crop up. He noted that the staff report mentioned that no outdoor
activities are permissiyle unless screened. He suggested mitigating the
outdoor swap meet by screening it.
Commissioner Tolatoy noted that outdoor swap meets are conditionally permitted
in the Heavy Industrial Area and not in the zone where the applicant'.
business is located.
Commissioner Chitiea asked who is responsible for the lighting and security of
the parking lot.
Mr. Page replied that they were in conjunction with the landlord.
Commissioner Chitiea noted that she had recently visited the property and it
had turned dark by the time she left. She felt the parking lot lighting was
insufficient with some lights not functioning. She said she saw no security
personnel and she felt very uncomfortable with the conditions. She wanted
those conditions addressed under the present circumstances.
Mr. Page stated they had contacted the Planning Department regarding the
lighting situation. He said one of the other tenants in the business park had
disconnected most of the parking lot lights because they had been on his
Planning Commission Minutes April 8, 1991
isa
rA$4 QBIT 11 1� V Z,
meter. He said they had discussed the problem with the other tenant and the
landlord and the landlord is working to correct the problem and install more
lighting.
Commissioner Chit ea requested that additional security personnel be prevent
anti.` the lighting ie sufficient.
Mr. Page asked if she was looking for uniformed security personnel.
Commissioner Chitiea noted she had not seen anyone at the time she was there
and she was very uncomfortable. She suggested someone be there in uniform so
that patrons and vendors will realize it is not merely someone who is
loitering.
Mr. Page agreed that was a goad suggestion and said he would work on it.
Ccotieeioner :eistoy asked if it would not be possible for the applicant to
require that vendors supply a copy of their business license before renting
them space.
Mr. Page responded that the vendors have to rent the apace before they cap
apply for a business license. He said there had also been some problems with
the franchise tax board. Mr. Page stated his lease agreements indicate that
City business licenses are required.
Commissioner Melchor noted that the applicant had indicated they were not open
on Friday evenings even though the current conditional use permit allows them
to be open.
Mr. Page responded that they found they did not generate enough business on
Friday evenings to justify being open. He said that during the day on Friday
seems to be a better time for women to shop alone rather than in the evening
hours when they are busy with the family. He noted that on the weekends they
generally draw entire families and it was felt they could greatly increase
their business by being open on Fridays during the day.
Commissioner Melchor recalled that the applicant had originally requested
weekend operations stating that their concept was to provide incubator stalls
for people who held other jobs. He asked how the vendors would be able to be
open on Fridays if they had other jobs.
Mr. Page remarked that not all vendors would be open on Fridays, but he
projected that about 50 percent would open with 100 percent on weekends.
Commissioner Melchor asked about the security personnel program. He asked how
many people were involved, what training they had received, and whether they
wear uniforms.
Mr. Page replied that they had terminated their contract with the security
firm first hired because they did not feel the employees were capable of doing
the job. He felt they were too old and infirm. He stated they had hired the
Planning Commission Minutes e8+.. April 9, 1992
I C7
head person from the security firm and 'ne now cas hired security personnel :ho
work dlfectly for Carnival Malls. He sea they ',ire young men up to age 25
who are healthy and alert and some have tad prlice training.
cc.- ,serener Melchor asked how many people are employed solely as security
personnel and when they are there,
Mr. Page said there are three security personnel there when the facility ie
span and none when it is closed.
Commissioner Toletoy recalled there had been discussions about the amount of
training for the security personnel. He noted that it did not appear the:.r
security personnel had been formally trained. He felt it is important that
the security people be adequately trained.
Mr. Page said that they are either ex- policemen or have been trained by
Carnival Malls staff,
Cemmise inner Melchor asked if the security personnel wear uniforms.
Mr. Page replied that they do not.
Commissioner Melchor asked how a patron or vendor would find a security
person.
Mr. Page replied that the head of security wears a badge. He remarked that
they could use uniforms.
Commissioner T014toy thought that had been discussed when the use was first
approved.
Mr. Coleman remarked that uniforms had been discussed, but they had not been
made a requirement. He said it was a requirement that security personnel were
to be provided both inside and outside.
Deran Yalian, Carnival Malls, 11530 Sixth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he
thought the Planning Commission had made a good decision when they approved
the Carnival Malls project. He said they had seen a lot of bu3lnesses come in
and Some have graduated to take offices in other parts of town. He noted that
the gentleman who runs the electronic@ swap meet was also in the audience.
Chairman McNlel asked Mr. Yalian's function with Carnival Malls.
Mr. 'Yalian replied that he manages the facility.
Bryan Brock, operator for General Dynamics swap meet, stated he had operated
the swap meet since its inception. He noted the swap meat was instituted for
the benefit of ham radio operators and took more than a year to be approved by
General Dynamics to coerate at its present location. He stated he had called
the Rancho Cucamonga business office and the Police Department when they were
organrrang and he was told that business licenses would not be required. He
Planning Commission Minutes 69... April 8, 1992
1 ,o &fold i "'C'" I
reported that the swap meet started operating in Zanuary 1988 and occurs on
the second Saturday of every month. He said « is a very successful Swap meet
with good quality merchandise. He noted that many people in the hobby cannot
afford to buy new equipment and therefore must shop at a swap meet. He said
he polices their swap meet every day that it operates and he looks for
hazarccus materials or other materials against their regulations. He Said he
wanted to move their operation to a class location, nor a flea market
atmosphere. He said they only have electronics and relative tools that the
hobbyist would use. He indicated the swap meet has grown tremendously and is
now the largest of its kind in Southern California. He said they would be
more than willing to work with the City to be Sur. that any necessary business
licenses are obtained. He requested that they be able to operate under a
temporary use permit so they could prove they run a class operation that would
complement Carnival Malls. He requested that staff and the Commissioners
visit the swap meet. He felt the swap meet is a benefit to the community and
noted that many of the vendors leave the swap meet and then go to lunch in the
area. He guessed that approximately 3,000 people attend the swap meet during
the course of the day.
Chairman McNial asked how many vendors generally participate.
Mr. Brock estimated 350 vendors on average.
Chairman McNial asked how that would affect parking at the facility.
Mr. Brock said their current lot is eat up so that vendors drive up and vend
from their parking spot.
Chairman McNiel asked why they had not considered having the vendors inside.
Mr. Brock said that Some of the vendor• would like to be indoors because they
have equipment which can be damaged by the elements; however, he felt it would
be difficult to have all of the vendors inside. He said some of the vendors
may even be interested in being full time participants at carnival Malls.
commissioner Melcher asked if the swap meet is secured by fencing when it
functions at General Dynamics.
Mr. Brock replied that it is not.
Commissioner Melcher asked if any other business is being conducted on the
property that day.
Mr. Brock said there could be a small number of employees working that day.
Commissioner Melchor asked how much area the swap meet occupies.
Mr. Brock said he had never done an overall parking space count.
Commissioner Melcher asked where they proposed placing the swap most at the
Carnival Mall site.
Planning Commission Minutes April 8, 1992
�6' � f*'440817
Mr. Brock said they had several ideas. He said their first thought had been
to use the area across the back of the -arming lot north of the building and
they might expand and use the northwest side -f necessary. He said both areas
are blocked from view of the street. He s;Id tne �rea they ise on the parking
lot woj.d depend upon how 'any vendors ohl:Pn to notate inside the building.
C=ln,nissioner Melchsr asked if all of that property was under the control of
tarn ... 1 Malls.
Mr. Page responded that it -was,
Commissioner Melcher asked where customers will park.
Mr- Brock said customers could park in front and on the aides. He recalled
that there were over 700 parking spaces available an alto. He thought there
were approximately 175 ir. the back area,
Pau) Petty, 9547 Clubhouse Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he worked with Mr.
Brock at the General Dynamos swap meet and had been with them since their
inception. He believed the function is necessary for the community. He said
the amateur radio community has grown through inventing and adapting existing
equipment. He said the sources for purchasing single components for
developing technology has dried up and it is virtually impossible to buy only
new equipment. He also noted that most people upgrade their equipment by
selling their old equipment. He remarked that used commercial equipment in
converted for private use. He noted that vendors and buyers from outside of
California attend the swap meet. He thought that if the hours do not overlap,
tnare should not be any parking problems.
Commx9sioner Melchor asked how much longer they would be operating at the
General Dynamics site.
Mr. Petty responded they did not know.
Commissioner Malcher asked if vendors are charged a fee.
Mr. Petty said a space fee is collected. He said they started out without
collecting fees, but the vendors requested garbage facilities and portable
toilets so they now collect fees to provide such services.
Richard Maratz, 8745 Lurline, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he had attended the
City Council meeting when the conditional use permit for Carnival Mail* was
discussed and he did not recall the council wanting to prohibit outdoor swap
meets. He requested a copy of the staff report.
Chairman McNiel stated that outdoor swap meets are permitted in Subarea 15 of
the industrial Area Specific Plan.
Mr. Maratz stated he frequents the swap meets as a buyer. He asked the
Commission to approve & temporary use permit for the swap meet to be held at
the Carnival Mail site. He said the swap meat currently has high visibility
Planning Commission Minutes April 8, 1992
iLlol � Y4flb (T `'(q"- (0
and allowing it to operate .::.der a temporary use Dermit would give the City
knowledge on how it would operate at the Carnival Mail site.
Sohn Wendt, 10260 56th Street, Mira Loma, stated he is a Licensed ham radio
cperator and a merter of Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (R.A.C.E.S.), a
group which works with the city's Disaster Preparedness daoartment. He said a
lot of the R.A.C.E.S. members buy equipment at the swap meet. He also
reported that electronics stores used to allow trade ins of used equipment, so
that people used to be able to buy used equipment at electronics stores. He
said that the stores no longer allow trade -ins, so the swap meet has become a
ma;or stucco, of equipment. He asked the Commission to look favorably upon the
swap meet.
Sohn Schute, 10155 Hemlock, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is a ham radio
operator and a R.A.C.E.S. member. He said the ham radio industry ie so
specialized that without the swap meet it would be necessary to drive to
downtown Los Angeles in order to purchase parts.
Chris Puent, stated she is one of the vendor. at Carnival Malls. She said she
is a big fan of used items in that she likes coLlectables and antiques. She
said she had been a vendor at Carnival Malls since Novemoer and it has been a.
tough year. She hoped that the introduction of the electronics swap meet
would benefit the Carnival Mall vendors and the mall vendors would benefit the
swap mcct people. She said that many of the Carnival Mall vendors are there
out of economic necessity because they have lost their other jobs.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Toletoy noted that the Commission needed to discuss applications
for expansion of permitted uses within Carnival Malls, an expansion of the
days of operation to include certain holidays, and an expansion of the hour,
of operation on Fridaya. He agreed with staff's recommendations on those
three items. He was concerned about the shared parking concept but felt staff
had addressed his concerns. He felt the security issue should be addressed as
he thought the operators had hired young people who dl.d not appear to have
adequate training. He also thought the applicant could address the business
license issue by not allowing anyone to sell without a City business
license. He supported the electronic swap meet, but was concerned about the
sale of used equipment, because he feared that other types of used equipment
may then be offered and that may lead to problems with stolen merchandise. He
noted that the City already has a subarea which conditionally approves outdoor
swap meets, and he felt that was where the electronic swap most should locate.
Commissioner Valletta agreed with staff's recommendations. She felt the
electronic swap meet has played an important part in the community and is a
valuable asset to the community, but she did not agree tnis was a proper
location.
Commissioner Melchor did not favor mixing service uses with the indoor swap
meet use. He noted that both types of uses are conditionally permitted within
the subarea but he did not feel it would be appropriate to mix the uses at one
Planning Commission Minutes I_)ZI April 8, 1992
location.. He opposed extending the hours of operat icn to inc.ude a.11 day
Friday because he felt that was an entrance to a request for other weekdays.
He thought there were too many areas where the applicant was not in compliance
with the original terms of the conditional use permit, and he thought perhaps
that recruest could be considered after the applicant had prover. they could
operate in ccmpliance. He supported the holidays recommended by staff. He
did not feel the commission had enough _nformatior, to make an informed
decision on the swap meet issue. He remarked that he planned to visit the
General Cynamlcs awap meet on Saturday. He felt a detailed plan should be
submitted for proposals on where vendors would park, where swap meet customers
and Carnival Mall customers would park, how the overlapping time would to
handled, etc. before the Commission could even consider permitting the swap
meet use.
Commissioner chitiea agreed with Staff's proposals regarding holiday.. She
thought the comments made by Commissioner Melcher with regard to Friday hours
were appropriate. She supported the electronics swap meet but did not feel It
would be appropriate to allow the use in this location. She encouraged the
swap meet operators to locate in Subarea 115, She felt the matter of security
to be important and thought the securit officers need to be trained and
identified by uniform.
Chairman McNiel said he was not opposed to mixing the uses. He did not oppose
extending the Friday hours even though the applicant may than return to ask
for additional weekday operating hours because he felt the Commission would
have the right to refuse. He supported the six legal holiday@ outlined by
staff. He agreed the swap most is valuable. He acknowledged that it may make
logical sense to tie the two uses together, but noted that it creates problems
for the City. He stated approval would set a precedent. He felt that if more
information and a better plan were presented, he may support the swap meet in
this location. He asked if it would be possible to act on Parts A, 8, and C
and defer action on the swap meet use.
Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Melchor noted that Chairman McNiel had indicated he was not
opposed to expanding the Friday hours of operation because he felt the city
would still have the option of refusing future requests to expand to other
days of the week. He noted that the original promise was that there would be
no conflict with other center users because the mall would only operate on
weekends. He felt retaining the weekend only hours would be appropriate.
Commissioner Valletta asked if the other Commissioners would support moving
the swap meet indoors at the Carnival Mall location. She said she was not
opposed to an indoor swap meet, but she would not support one outdoors.
Mr. Buller indicated there would nave to be an amendment to the conditional
use permit to allow sale of used equipment. He thought perhaps the condition
could be worded to identify a certain indoor area could be used for the swap
meet.
Planning Commission Minutes Y1Vt_ April B, 1992
Commissioner Melchor suggested that all vendors at the swap meet section
should be required to be l.:censed ham operators.
Commissioner Toletoy questioned if the electronics swap meet were approved, if
tie City would then have to approve other types of swap meets for other types
of used merchandise.
Mr. Buller noted that temporary use permits are generally approved for special
sales of normal merchandise. He said staff had felt that the request was not
in the spirit of a normal temporary use permit.
Commissioner Melchor asked that the Commieeionere further discuss the
requested uses in Part A.
Chairman McNiel did not oppose any of the requested uses.
Commissioner Melchor did not feel mortgage brokers, real estate services,
travel bureaus, beauty /nail salons, or photography studios should be added.
He thought other areas of the City are better suited for those uses.
Commissioner Chitiea agreed this is an industrial area and she felt thost
types of businesses would be better placed in other areas of the City. Shs'
felt their inclusion in this area would diffuse the Commercial base.
Commissioner Toletoy felt jewelry repair might be acceptable, but he did not
support the other uses.
Chairman McNiel felt there may be small, incubator businesses in all of those
types of businesses and he thought this may be an area for them to start.
Commissioner Toletoy noted that a travel agency would not be successful
without having expensive computer equipment.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Vallette, to adopt the resolution
approving Modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03, Part A, with
modification to only expand the uses to include jewelry repair services.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
CHITIEA,
MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
MCNIEL
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
NONE
- carried
Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the resolution
approving Modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03, Part B, to expand the
hours of operation to include six legal holidays. Motion carried by the
following vote:
Planning Commission Minutes idN-/ April 8, 1992
1 �P'5 r- 44 I Orr \ 14, P -I
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 25, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
By: Anna-Lis. Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - A
request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the
permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot Indoor
Wholesale/Retail Commercial use located within the General
Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
(Continued from February 26, 1992.)
ABSTRACT: This applicatio,, involves a three -part modification to
Conditional Use Permit 91 -03 and relates to the operation of the
Carnival Malls site. Part A is a request to expand the permitted uses
within the site. Part H is a request to expand the permitted hours of
operation during holidays. Finally, Part C is a request to expand the
hours of operation to include Fridays, in addition to the current
weekend operations.
These modifications relate to the existing Carnival Malls site, an
Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use. Industrial Specific Plan
Amendment 91 -03, approved by the City Council on July 3, 1991,
conditionally allows the use to locate within Subareas 8, 9, 10, 11, 13,
14, and 15 within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Conditional Use
Permit 91 -03 for Carnival Malls was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 25, 1991, and the use began operation in November of 1991.
Staff supports the approval of Part, A and H, with minor modifications,
as they are consistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan. However, Part C, the expansion of the hours of operation on
Fridays, cannot he supported by staff as the applicant has failed to
comply with the conditions of approval and lacks sufficient parking.
This report reviews each request independently and provides the
appropriate resolution for each.
APPLICANT'S REQUESTS:
A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: The applicant has requested that the
following uses be permitted to operate within the Carnival Malls
site: travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, beauty
or nail salons, and photography studios. Photography studios and
travel agencies are listed under the Personal Services category.
Mortgage brokers and real estate sales are listed under the
H 10
ExH /6.r 11
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TO CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
`March 25, 1992
pace 2
category of Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services.
Finally, beauty salens;'nail salons are listed under the category of
Convenience Sales and Sera_oes. (See Exhibit "F ").
Staff Comments: All of the requested uses are listed under
categories that are currently conditionally permitted within
Subarea 11, with the approval of the Planning Commission. These
uses w111 not adversely impact the existing of future uses within
Carnival Malls or the site.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission conditionally permit the proposed uses, as identified
above, to locate within the Carnival Malls.
B. Extension of Hours of Operation During Holidays: The applicant is
proposing to extend the existing permitted hours of operation to
include, "ALL LEGAI, HOLIDAYS, such as, New Year's Day, Valenttne's
Day, Lincoln's and Washington's Birthday, St. Patrick's Day, Armed
Forces Day, Memorial Day, Flag Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,
Columbus Day, United Nation's Day, Halloween, Veteran's Day,
Thanksgiving Day (and the day after), and the week before
Christmas." (See Exhibit "C -1. ")
Staff Comments: A majority of the days that the applicant is
proposing to operate are net legal holidays. In general, most
industrial and office businesses operate through all of the above
identified holidays. However, it can be reasonably argued that
most businesses shutdown or reduce operations on Independence Day,
Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. There may be
cumulative parking impacts to the existing light industrial users,
and future users on the site if the request is granted as
proposed. The parking study, submitted by the applicant in June
1991, indicates that there is a deficit of 85 parking stalls with
all existing and future site users operating at the same time isee
Alternative 3 of the attached Exhibit, "D ") on a weekday.
Additional impacts that may effect other site users are noise,
traffic, and trash. In general, other site users are not
negatively impacted by the indoor wholesale /retail cosmercial use
because they maintain typical hours of operation, from 7:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., while the Carnival Malls site currently operates during
peak off -set hours (i.e., Friday nights and weekends). Therefore,
the site is adequately maintained, and routine upkeep for the site
is facilitated by the off -set hours. Based upon routine site
inspections, these issues up until this point, have been adequately
mitigated. However, use of the site by Carnival Malls on a
majority of these holidays could lead to impacts to other site
users operating at the same time.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE
March 25, 1992
Page 3
Staff Recommendation: Staff recormnends Chat the Planning
Commission approve the expanded hours of operation to include the
following holidays only: Independence Day, MerorraI may,
T'nankscivinc Day, and Christmas Day.
C. Expanded Hours of Operation on Fridays: In addition to requesting
expanded 'hours of operation during holidays, the applicant is
requesting that the Planning Commission extend their current hours
of operation to include Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. (See Exhibit
Staff comments: The applicant currently maintains the following
hours of operation:
Monday through Friday - 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 P.M.
(Incidental stacking of merchandise for vendors and
office hours for the management team - not open to the
public.)
Friday - 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Retail Sales
Saturday - 10:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. - Retail Sales
Sunday - 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. - Retail Sales
The primary impact of allowing retail sales during the daytime
hours on Fridays is parking. As discussed in Part B above, the
parking study projected an 85 -space parking deficit on site for all
users operating at the same time on a weekday (see Alternative 3 of
Exhibit "D "). The parking standards applied to this alternative
are consistent with the existing Industrial Area Specific Plan and
Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff cannot support the
expansion because of the inadequacy of parking facilities on -site.
OTHER ISSUES: When this project was originally approved, the Planning
Commission found it important to establish a compliance review for the
intended use. The condition requires that the Planning Commission
conduct a public hearing, twelve months from the date of release of
occupancy, to ensure conformance with the conditions of approval and any
other health, safety, and welfare issues (see Condition No. 16 in
Exhibit "C ^). Staff has been carefully monitoring the business
operation since their opening in November of 1991. The applicant has
been in significant compliance with the conditions of approval.
However, staff has been working with the applicant on two outstanding
compliance issues: (1) security and (2) business licensing.
A. Security - Approximately one week after the project's opening in
November 1991, Carnival Malls released their security personnel and
are in violation of this condition. Security was to be provided, a
minimum of two security personnel for the first 25,000 square feet
of leasable area, in addition to the personnel /management team.
Staff has not received any security complaints from the users,
11�� Y-0 1817 "44 �'L
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TC CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
March 25, 1992
Page 4
neighboring businesses, or th'e Police Department. This may be
attributed, in Dart, to the sluagi sh economy which 'eas curtailed
their business volume.
B. Business Licensing - The Planning Division and Business Licensing
staff have worked very closely to ensure that all businesses
locating within Carnival Malls are properly licensed. At present,
approximately 38 percent of the businesses still in operation have
not been licensed (see Exhibit "E "). Though the applicant has
complied with the specific condition that a monthly list of
businesses be provided to the Planning and Business Licensing
Divisions, the intent of the condition has not been met.
Busi�nsses are operating without proper business licenses which
means a loss of sales tax revenue for the City.
Business Licensing has proved to be a difficult condition to
enforce. In addition to the monthly tenant list, Business
Licensing staff has had several on -site inspections on weekends in
order to educate the vendors within Carnival Malls of the Business
Licensing procedures. In reviewing this condition with the City
Attorney, staff believes the language is as strong as it can be.
Though these issues appear to be resolvable and are being addressed
by the applicant, staff believes it to be important to raise these
issues should the Commission find them germane to the applicant's
request to expand the business operation. The condition requires
that a review be conducted in November of 1992; however, the
Commission may review a CUP at any other time deemed necessary to
ensure compliance.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT /POLICE DEPARTMENT: Both the Fire
District and the Police Department have been notified of the proposed
use. Both departments have expressed no objection to the applicant's
request.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following
findings in order to approve this application:
A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Development Coder and the purposes of the
Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located; and
e. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan.
l�°t SXll MWIT lit` %,S
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - iAM.ES PAGE
March 25, 1992
page 5
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been
posted, and notices were sent to adjacent property owners within 300
feet of the project.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Part A and B. with modifications, of the applicant's request to expand
the permitted uses and operate during specific holidays through the
attached Resolutions of Approval. Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission deny the applicant's request to expand the 'hours of operation
to include Fridays through the attached Resolution of Denial. However,
if after your review, the Commission deems that there is sufficient
evidence to warrant a full compliance examination, then a public hearing
date should be chosen and properly advertised to consider possible
modification or revocation of the CUP. In that case, the applicant's
request for expansion should be continued to the same date.
Peeper y submi ed,
Brad ler
City Planner
BB:ALH /jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" -
Exhibit "B" -
Exhibit "C" -
Exhibit "D" -
Exhibit "E" -
Exhibit "F"
Exhibit "G" -
Resolution of
Resolution of
Resolution of
Site plan
Floor Plan
Applicant's Letter
Parking Study
Business License Memo
ISP Land Use Summary
Resolution No. 91 -80
Approval for Expanded Uses
Approval to Operate During
Denial to Expand the Hours
Specific Holidays
of Operation
�Jo E�X-H IeWrii -4 qf
T.bk 2
SITE PA G REOUL4EA¢ m
1-1� P,- Y. /I 0151-F'S
1n RaW MYI It, Aw F0 Amo m loc
— WEEi.'DAY
-
TOTAL
TOTAL
SITE
PARIOTIG
SPACES
PAR1O3lG
SPACES
L VD USE
:SF
RE0002EMF2VT
2E000tED
REOVa2EMENP
REOVRiFD
AOnv4�e 1
e6 ut W
Om�pd
11
i0
0
0
tSOUt
x720
I6,]OS
1/D000
i3
0
0
00¢
V.ant
3808
1?50
133
.W1000
76
Rcu
101553
VIM
11
1/1000
C11
TOTAL
5%
40
� 2
lmd
O p00
N3DD
1/2000
10
0
0
V.
2620
1 /2m
13
0
0
Om
V.1
34100
V150
153
."now
26
In6oar Rmd
101552
11/1000
m
1111000
3A1
TOTAL
501
316
A0aio14e 3
1m.v
O ped
31x00
In000
I0
0
0
Vu
26,705
lam
0
0
0
Omer
Va ,
31300
11250
US
.an00o
26
l Rnnt
103!32
1:150
in
1150
mi
TOTAL
075 •
717
1-1� P,- Y. /I 0151-F'S
1n RaW MYI It, Aw F0 Amo m loc
December 10, 1991
Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91tio
Dear Anna -Lisa:
After careful consideration of our operation and its impact on
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Carnival Mails is applying to the
Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a
MODIFICATION of its existing CUP at 115JU SIXTH Street.
We are requesting the tollowing
1) Inclusion of Personal Service Sales In addition to Now
Products Sales. These Personal Services typically include,
but are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers,
real estate sales, personal care, ( beauty or nail care )r-
photography studios and other activities typical of a
personal service nature.
1) Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL
HOLIDAYS, sucn as; NEW YEARS DAY VALENTINE'S DAY, LINCOLN'S
d WASHINHTON'S BIRTHDA , ST. PATRICK'S DAY, ARMED FORCES
DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY,
COLUMBUS DAY, UNITED NATION'S DAY, HALLOWEEN, VETERANS DAY,
THANKSGIVING, the day after THANKSGIVING and the Week before
CHRISTMAS.
3) Extention of our HOURS of Operation on FRIDAYS to Start
at IU:()U AM. Instead of b:UU PM. and End at U:UU PM.
we are requesting this for the following reasons:
1) Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE in our LAND USE
Sun -ARRA. It is also a PERMITTED USE in the ADJACENT OFFICE
BUILDING on Site. It will be a MINOR portion of the Total
Use of the vendors in our facility. In most other cities It
Is a PERMITTED COMMERCIAL USE. It Is also part of the
EXISTING USE in the MAJOR MALLS In the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
L; Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS means EXISTING TENANTS
in the other buildings on site, during those Holidays, WILL
BE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS
TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on these Holdays for the jams
reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during the WEEK
BEFORE CHRISTMAS In that this is a period when people take
Vacations and business In our area Is generally light. ALL
COMPARABLE FACILITIES CHARGE "EXTRA RENTAL- which means some
of our Tenants will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some will be
tied up In FULL TIME JOBS ELSEWHERE. This will REDUCE our
TOTAL occupancy, customer traffic and overall parking needy if
112- F_W iE51-r 1J
31 PARKING STUDIES DONE ( ON COMPARABLE FACILITIES ) IN OUR
INITIAL PARKING STUDY, SHOW THAT FRIDAY IS A "LIGHT RETAIL
DAY "• We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY Is not a FAMILY
SHOPPING DAY. In addition, a number of our TENANTS are
EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS.
This Is the reason that FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY" In
all comparable facilities.
As per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done for the CUP, TABLE '/,
ALTERNATE MJ, WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN
SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TINE PERIOD ".
Of ALL the requirements for parking availability the Limits
under ALTERNATE #3 are the moot RESTRICTIVE, HOWEVER FOR THE
TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS.
IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS
MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A
YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE MAKING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR THE FUTURE
NOW!
Thank you again for your Kind help.
S cerel�
J mete Pdga
oz carnivat Malls
JRP /la
( f
113x{'f"l8l'l�
RESOLUTION ND. (/ l - !I �O
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION 'I0 CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 91 -03, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF
OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS I1 SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-
262-28.
A. Recitals.
(1) James Page has filed an application for a modification to
Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -03 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit modification request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission approved
the indoor wholesale. /retail commercial use for the following hours of
operation: Fridays 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on
Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays.
(iii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iv) After receiving all public testimony, the Planning Commission
made the determination that the extension of hours of operation on Fridays
would negatively impact existing and future site users (parking, circulation,
site maintenance, etc.). As a result, the Planning Commission directed stuff
to prepare a Resolution of Denial to return at their meeting of April 22,
1992.
(v) On the 22nd day of April 1992, the Planning Commission received
public, testimony on the Resolution. At the conclusion of the public
testimony, the Planning Comission adopted a Resolution of Denial on the
application.
(vi) On May 4, 1992, the applicant filed an appeal of the Planning
Commission decision within the time limits prescribed by law.
(vii) On the 3rd day of June 1992, the City Council conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that
date.
(viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
E. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
I j\-j
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
APPEAL OF MOD. TO CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAMES PAGE
June 3, 1992
Page 2
1. This Council hereby specifically finds tnat all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above - referenced public hearing on June 3, 1992, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 11520 Sixth
Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and
is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760
parking spaces; and
(b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General
Industrial.
(c) The Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial Use is located within a
General Industrial zone Subarea 11 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The
General Industrial zone was intended to accommodate a wide range of light to
medium manufacturing and wholesale, storage and distribution uses. Typically,
administrative office, professional, and indoor wholesale /retail commercial
uses are not allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. The primary
finding in permitting the use to locate within the Research and Development
Industrial Center was the fact that there would not be any conflict with the
hours of operation of the general industrial users within the site with off-
set hours of operation on weekends only. The ancillary nature of the indoor
wholesale /retail commercial use on weekends only was found to be consistent
with the original intent of the General Industrial zone. This proposal to
expand the hours of operation directly conflicts with the intent of the
General Industrial zone of the Industrial Specific Plan and would conflict
with on -site business operations.
(d) The original approval of the application was based on the fact
that the application would operate during different hours of operation of
other users within the center, thereby, minimizing all potential impacts to
other current site and future businesses. With the current proposal, hours of
operation on Fridays from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 P.M. would conflict with the
hours of operation of other site users and adversely impact those businesses.
(e) The proposed hours of operation would conflict with the
utilization of parking facilities for other users within the site.
(f) The Development Code requirement for the indoor wholesale /retail
commercial use is 1 parking space per 100 square feet; however, the Planning
Commission may approve 1 space per 150 square feet based upon a parking
study. The parking study indicates that 875 parking spaces would be required
(using a 1/150 ratio) for the entire site on weekdays, whereas, only 760
parking spaces are available.
1-)5
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
APPEAL OF MOD. TO CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAME5 PAGE
June 3, 1992
Pace 3
(g) The Planning Commission rejected the use of a "shared parking"
approach to calculating parking because of uncertainty of future tenant use
classifications and lack of sufficient narking demand data for indoor
wholesale /retail Commercial use.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes
as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will be detrimental. to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific
Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
W
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO Mayor and Members of the City Co cit
FROM: Debra J. Adams, CIVIC, City Clerk
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MATTERC FOR THE NOVEMBER 9 1992 CONSIDERATION OF FOR THE ELECTION
5,
Attached you will find Resolutions relating to the November 3, 1992 election. It is
recommended that the Council adopt the following Resolutions:
1. Calling for the Municipal Election to be held November 3, 1992, for the
positions of Mayor, two City Council seats, City Clerk and City Treasurer and to
consolidate said election with the County of San Bernardino.
2. Approving the regulations for candidates running for elective office.
At the Council's February 19, 1992 meeting it was approved to place an initiative on the ballot
asking the voters should the Mayor's term be changed from two to four years. It is
recommended that the Council adopt the following Resolution:
Calling for the special municipal election to be held November 3, 1992 and
submitting to the voters the question of changing the Mayor's term from two to
four years and to consolidate said election with the County of San Bernardino.
Additionally, the following Resolutions are notional for the Council's consideration relative to
the Mayor's tern measure. You may approve or disapprove any of the Resolutions listed below
as you so choose:
Authorizing certain members to file a written argument regarding a Clty
measure.
2. Directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis.
3. Providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City Measure.
After the Council considers all of the above items, I will proceed as required to place these
matters on the November 3 ballot.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 989 -1851, Ext. 2005.
/dja
Attachments
1
RE90TDPSCK NO. 92 -L
Y V• • Y •:•i Y I . I '• Y
H5 5• Y' a 5 • • la • I /1 M
• Y5'J • V5•w • i I M 95• I' S• 1 1
•a 1 • 515•' M /a. I• •• 4` 11• 1' I•
a 5. r v 5 u 5 5• • a 5 • • la • r
n ••
V&HRFAS, iader the provisions of the laws relating to General Law
Cities in the state of California, a general municipal election shall be held
on 'Tuesday, November 3, 1992, for the election of Municipal Officers.
NOW, THEREEME, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamlmiga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1: That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the
State of California relating to General law Cities within said State, there
shall be, and there is hereby called and ordered, held in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Oxmty of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the 3rd
day of November, 1992, a General Municipal Election of the qualified electors
of said City for the paTnse of electirg a Mayor of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for full term of two years; two mmartuer's of the City Crnmcil for the
fall term of far years; a City Clerk of the City of Rmyho Curamcxga for a
full term of far years; and a City Treasurer of the City of Rands Cucamonga
for a full term of four years.
SF
9WCN 2: That the General Municipal Election hereby called for the
date bereinbefore specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with
the Statewide General Election to be held on said date within the City. The
proceedings, polling places, precincts, precinct board members and officers
for the General Municipal rlection hereby called shall be the same as those
provided for said Statewide General Election. The Board of Supervisors of San
BerrkuY ino County is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the
General Municipal Election hereby called with said Statewide General Election,
and said Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of
said General Municipal Election and said election shall be held in all
respects as if there were only one election and one formal ballot, namely the
ballot used at said General Election shall be used. Said Registrar of Voters
shall supervise the canvass of said returns for said Special municipal
Election and transmit said returns to the City Council of said City which
shall thereafter declare the results thereof.
SD-M�v: The City of Rancho 0.ravmga shall reimburse said County
for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the
City of a properly approved bill.
SMMCtl 4: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Qramcnga is
directed to forward, without delay, to said Board of Supervisors and to said
Registrar of Voters each a certified copy of this Resolution.
I T6
RESOILMCN NO. 92 ->��
95�•ri1•` • I y Ny1 • 11 w • •'•
Y II 11 >. 1^ p • Y
1 5YN I
• •
F 5•
1 >• • 1 1 }> Y• U 1 I M. • it
Y 1111'1 5: W 515 •:• I I N5 5• MY 51 5
• Id 1 1 1 I M • 5.x.1 • 5 .0 5•
YdMEAS, Section 10012 of the Elections Cade of the State of
California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt
regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal
election, including costs of the candidates statement.
NOW, TSffMWE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dons
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECMCN 1• General Provisiore. That pursuant to Section 10012 of
the Election Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective
office to be voted for at the Qi w Municipal Election to be held in the
City of Rancho Cucemo ga on November 3, 1992, may prepare a candidate's
statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement
may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief descrip-
tion of m more than 200 words of the candidate's edunatirn and qualifications
expressed by the candidate himself or herself. Such statement shall not
include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in
partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed in the office
of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed.
Such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing
nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close
of the nomination period.
SECTION 2: §panish A candidate may elect to have said
candidate statement translated into Spanish at an additional cost to be
determined by the Registrar of Voters.
St'MON 3: Additional Materials. No candidate will be permitted to
include additional materials in the sample ballot package.
SBMCN 4: Pavement. The Registrar of Voters shall estimate the
total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate's
statements filed pursuant skuant to the Elections Code and require each candidate
filing a statement to pay in advance his or her pro rata share as a condition
of having his or ber statement included in the voter's pamphlet. The
Registrar. of Voters shall bill each candidate for any cost in excess of the
deposit and shall refund within 30 days of the election any unused portion of
the deposit.
5=0H 5: That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the
candidate's representative a copy of this Resolution at tits time nominating
petitions are issued.
Iliq
Resolution No. 92 - * **
Pa4e 2
M=CN 6: fiat all previous resolutions establishing camoil policy
on payment for candidates statements are repealed.
SUMIIN 7: That this Resolution shall apply only to the election to
be held on November 3, 1992, and shall than be repealed.
mV
RE901IM014 N0. 92 -*M
• N• • N• 1 °� V• I 11 I '• N • 1 1
• 11' • V•J Y ■•• 3 3 • • IY 1 1 1
M •' k1 1I 411•d J 1 • • J I: 3•
1 1 • A • • 11 31 J C••• • 11 Y
• • •I N' • l •• N3•. 1 I 13• 1 1
n • • n y • I• Y • 3•.
""S, the City Camcil desires to submit to the electors of the
City the question of whether the Mayor shall serve a four year term; and
[•URFAS, the submis sion of said question to the electors at a special
election held for that purpose is authorized by GoverTment Nde 34900.
NOW, Ti E, the City Council of the City of R urbo Cucamonga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SOMCN 1: That pursuant to the regairements of the laws of the
state of California relating to general law cities within said State, there
shall be, and there is hereby called and ordered to be held in the City of
macho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday,
the third (3rd) day of Nov®Iber, 1992, a special municipal election for the
purpose of submitting the following question to the electors of the City of
Rarcho Cucamonga, California, to wit:
SFX.TICN 2: That the special ariicipal election hereby called for the
date hereinabove specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with
the statewide general election to be held on said date, and within said city
the precincts, polling places and officers of election for the special
aunicipal election hereby cited shall be the same as these provided for said
statewide general election. The Board of STexVisors of San Bernardino Canty
is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the special municipal
election hereby called with said statewide general election, and said Board of
Supervisors is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said special
municipal election and said election shall be held in all respects as if there
were only one (1) election, and only one (1) form of ballot, numel.y, the
ballots used in said general election, shall be used. Said Board of
Supervisors shall certify the results of the canvass of the rehaTs of said
special municipal election to the City Council of said city which shall
thereafter declare the results thereof.
1431
Y's
^Shall the term of office of Mayor
be four years'."
SFX.TICN 2: That the special ariicipal election hereby called for the
date hereinabove specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with
the statewide general election to be held on said date, and within said city
the precincts, polling places and officers of election for the special
aunicipal election hereby cited shall be the same as these provided for said
statewide general election. The Board of STexVisors of San Bernardino Canty
is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the special municipal
election hereby called with said statewide general election, and said Board of
Supervisors is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said special
municipal election and said election shall be held in all respects as if there
were only one (1) election, and only one (1) form of ballot, numel.y, the
ballots used in said general election, shall be used. Said Board of
Supervisors shall certify the results of the canvass of the rehaTs of said
special municipal election to the City Council of said city which shall
thereafter declare the results thereof.
1431
RuSolutionn No. 92 - * **
Page 2
SUMCN 3: That the polls for said election shall be opened at
7 :00 A.M. on the day of said election and shall remain open continuously from
said time until 9:00 P.M. of the same day when said polls shall be closed,
eucept as provided in Section 14436 of the Elections Code of the State of
California.
SUCITCN 4: That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution,
said elections shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding
municipal elections in said city.
SBMCN 5: That notice of the time and place of holding said
election is hm-eby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed
and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election in
time, farm, and manner required by law.
SBCITCN 6: That the Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to
issue instructions to the Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps
necessary for the holding of said consolidated election.
SECPICN 7• The City of Panhdho Cucamonga recognizes that additional
costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this arsolidation and
agrees to reimburse the County for any such costs.
SfICPiCN 8: That the City Clerk of the City of Rancho o Cucamonga is
hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of
Shpavisors and the Registrar of Voters of the Casty of San Bernardino.
ion
OPTIONAL
RE'lJI ON NO. 92- /S
• 5:• • • Y I Y •• M■ •' Y I a • • Y
• V • P 1 • •� 1 l• 1 Vi•1V t • 1> C Yw
• • p "C ' li 'O •A 1 M IY ^ i•
WHEREAS, a special mmicipal election is to be held in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on Novede 3, 1992, at which time there will be submitted to
the qualified electors of the City the follawing question:
"Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years ?"
Now, TbRIMIME, the City Council of the City of Rancho nramonga does
hereby .resolve, declare, detex m and order as follows:
SPX=QH 1: That this City Council, being the legislative body of the
City of Rancho nramorga, authorizes:
members of that body, to file a written argument in favor of The City measure
set froth in the recitals hereof in aoccmdance with Article 6, OkVter 3,
Divisim 5 of the Elections Code of the State of California and to change the
argument until and including the date fined by the City Cleric after which no
argu ne nts for or against the City mwamm may be submitted to the City Clerk.
YAM
WIM
OPTIONAL
RFSOPS/ CN NO. 92
7�• • • it •• YI • 41 Y • •'•
•'P • V' t••. •••> I 1I M C•.
MUIUM, a special municipal election is to be held in the City of
Poncho Cuuanorga on November 3, 1992, at which these will to submitted to the
qualified electors of the City the following question:
"-Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years ?"
NOW, nMZM=, the City mlmcil of the City of Rancho Cucmoaga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SNCt•ICK is That this City Council directs the city Clerk to transmit
a copy of the questim to the City Attorney, ahe City Attorney shall prepare
an impartial analysis showing the effect of the questions on the existing law
and the operation of the measure. Mrt impartial analysis shall be filed by
the date set by the city Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
IqLA
OPTIONAL
1�;b
MSCUMC T NO. 92`+1
• Y• • N 1 • °� "• U 1 •I' 1 1 1 1
VMEAS, Section 5014.5 of the Elections Azle of the State of
California authorizes the city Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions
to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City ^ea_ras submitted at
municipal elections.
NOW, MMMU26, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine, and miler as follas:
SbM,W 1: That pursuant to Sects 5014.5 of the Elections Code of
the State of California, if any person submits an argument against a City
measure, and an argument has been filed in favor of the city measure, the City
Clerk shall immediately send copies of that argument to the persons filing the
argument in favor of the City measre. The persons filing the argument in
favor of the city measure nay prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not
exoeeditg 300 words. The City Clerk shall sad copies of the argument in
favor of the measure to the persons filing the argument against the City
measure, who may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument to the argument in
favor of the City measure not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments
shall be filed with the City Clark not more than 10 days after the final date
for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same
mariner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately
follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
SEMM 2: That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of
rebuttal arguments for City measures are repealed.
S =CK 3: fiat the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the
election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 1992, and shall than be repealed.
1$5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City manager
BY: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst f
SUBJECT: LIBRARY MASTER PLAN
At the .April 1, 1992 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to
contact the County regarding its plans for current and future library
services and facilities in Rancho Cucamonga and verification of revenues
and expenditures associated with library services in Rancho Cucamonga.
,Attached is the response from Harry M. Mays, County Administrative
Officer. Under Item 1, "Verification of Revenues and Expenditures," Mr.
Mays states that the City of Rancho Cucamonga generated approximately
$300,000 in tax revenues for library services. This amount is significantly
lower than what staff estimated was being generated for library purposes
(approximately $1.2 million). Because of the discrepancy, staff contacted
Barbara Anderson, the County Librarian, regarding the matter. Ms.
Anderson stated that she would investigate as to whether this included the
combined monies generated from the City and the Agency Project Area.
As of the date of this report's preparation, Ms. Anderson has not
responded. An additional point of clarification, on page two of the letter is
a summary of expenses incurred by the County for providing library
services. The amount of the indirect facility expense (10,800 sq.ft. x $1.00)
needs to be multiplied by twelve in order to calculate the annual cost of
$129,600.
The library subcommittee (Williams and Wright) directed staff at their last
meeting to develop a chart which provides figures for a number of
construction options. Attached is the chart which gives estimated
construction and the estimated operations and maintenance costs for
different sized libraries. Option One is the original plan of a 135,000 gross
square foot library (104,000 net sq.ft.). Option Two shows the costs
associated with a 75,000 gross square foot library (60,000 net sq.ft.).
Option Three shows the costs for the original 135,000 gross square foot
library, but initially occupying 30,000 square feet. Option Four provides
the data on a 38,000 gross square foot library (30,000 net sq.ft.).
Also attached is a brief outline of the withdrawal process as outlined in the
Implementation Document. One item to note is that at the time of
withdrawal, the City Council has the option of acting as the Library Board
or appointing the initial Board Members.
As always, staff is available to answer any questions.
Respectfully submitted,
i
Linda D. Daniels
Deputy City Manager
attachments: Letter dated May 11, 1992 from Harry Mays
Construction, Operations and Maintenance Chart
Outline of Withdrawal Process
!S1
COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO
County Administrative Office
HARRY M. MAYS
Coonry Admintrvauve Omm
May 11, 1992
Mr. Jack Lam, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Jack:
No. 1 Arrowhead Pl , 5th Floor
385 North Arrowhead A,..c
San Berwdino, CA 9MI"IN
(714) 387-5418
Td,pie (714) 387:V30
BOARD OF SUMVISORS
Muria Turotl .......................
Fm O Mar
tan D. MAdv ......................
Snvnd M,,,
Barbva Cram Riordan ...............
nW Dvrritt
Larry WWku, Chaimun .............
Fm hcuma
Robe" L. Hanamck .............
.... Ffth IXrr.in
RECEIVED
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ADMINISTRATION
MAY 19 1992
Please refer to your letter to me dated April 6, 1992, regarding library service to the City
of Rancho Cucamonga.
In your letter, you asked for a verification of revenues and expenditures associated with
providing County library service to the City, a plan for providing library services
commensurate with the tax revenues generated within the City for library service, and a
capital facilities plan detailing how current and future library facilities will be financed and
maintained. I am responding to each of these areas of concern separately as follows:
Verification of Revenues and Expenditures
According to the County Auditor - Controller, the County Library is expected
to receive approximately $800,000 of the $64 million in tax revenues
generated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in FY 1991 -92, The Library's
share of these revenues is based on amounts collected in 118 separate tax
rate areas within the City for support of the County's free library system.
The County Library's projected expenditures for operation of the Rancho
Cucamonga Library in FY 1991 -92 are $800,445. This figure is based on
both direct and indirect expenditures incurred by the County to operate the
Library branch. A breakout of these expenditures by major expenditure
category follows:
M
JACK LAM
Page 2
May 11, 1992
FY 1991 -92
EXPFNDITURE CATEGORY EXPUSD�
Direct
Indirec
Salary and Benefits (9.0 budgeted staff) $ 264,383
Services and Supplies 149,704
Capital Equipment 8,279
Facilities Costs (Utilities, 38.880
maintenance, custodial)
Subtotal $ 461,246
Administrative Overhead -County Library $ 164,369
Administrative Overhead - COWCAP 45,230
Facility (10,800 sq. ft. 129,600
0$1.00)
Subtotal $ 339,199
GRAND TOTAL $ 800,445
2. Library Service Plan
Although the County Library is sensitive to the amount of tax- generated
revenue it receives from each of the communities it serves, the department
does not formulate an annual service plan for branch operations based on
this factor alone. The County Library system is a countywide regional
program and, as such, attempts to provide a reasonably consistent service
level to all the municipalities and communities it serves. In some years, the
Library's planning priorities for a given regional branch may take precedent
over other branches in the system. Accordingly, some fiscal years may be
perceived as "better than others" in terms of satisfying community
expectations for library service, some may he perceived as "worse." The
overall objective, however, is to ensure that each branch is provided with
an annual level of service that is generally commensurate with the needs of
its community.
19
JACK LAM
Page 3
May 11, 1992
3. Facilities Plannine
As part of the regional planning process, the Library has created a
Structures and Improvement Fund to finance the relocation of County
library facilities, establish new sites, and remodel/expand existing facilities.
Cities wishing to significantly expand their current branch facilities or add
new branches share the responsibility for procuring the requisite financing
for such capital projects. In the past, the County Library has been
supportive of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's past efforts to secure State
Library Bond Act funding for this purpose and will participate with the City
in future grant applications for construction funding.
I hope this information is responsive to the questions raised by the City Council. In
closing, I should mention that the County's goal is to continue providing a high level of
library service to the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As you are aware, the
County Library provides service from the existing branch as well as six bookmobile
locations. The bookrnobiles stop at retirement homes, mobile home parks, and various
neighborhoods. Additionally, they stop at YMCA camps during the summer. The
Library's proposed budget for FY 1992 -93 includes adequate funding to continue these
levels of service,
If you have any further questions regarding the County Library's services to the City,
please feel free to contact my office or that of Barbara Anderson, County Librarian, at
387 -5721.
ncerely'
'i
I,
HA RY . MAYS
County Administrative Officer
cc Honorable Jon Mikels, Second District
Tim Kelly, GSG Assistant Administrative Officer
Barbara Anderson, County Librarian
1Ro
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK L IRARY OPERATING BUDGE[ COMPARISON
May 20, 1992
N
92111120W
d
135,000 G.S.F_
OC&
Trre Qlld'ra Tlrn3e OefiM Far
75,OD0 G.S.F. 135,000 G.S.F. 3kOOD G.S.E
M Library a 104.000 "°
Library a 60,0001°d Librny @ 30,000 NN talruy 0 30,000
Staff Salaries and Benefits 2,190,000. 11)
1,989,888. 1,641,744. m 1,641,744. -
Library Materials 505,500. (a
455,400. 10 396,000.0 396,000. �
(Boat. and Audio Yon)
Library meting Expense 442,000. o)
441,017. (* 377,803. 0 377,803.1%
Supptia)
Library Capital Expense 40,ODD. m
40,000.10 40.000.'* 40,000. 0)
(Addition sid Replme.e )
d
Building Maintenance and 583,200. F1
324,000. m 194,400.0 194,400, m
Utilities
Grounds Maintenance and 113,600. M
113,600. m 113,600. m 113,600. m —
Utilities
6
J
Tom 3,874,303.
3,363,905. 2,763,547. 2,763,547.
Library- Level Op{i__ One
at Service
O n Pty Two
__ Ootinn Thwn Ontim Four
S.F./Population .9 14>
.5210 (0 26 "'
m
Comparison- Current
.26
c
E
S.F./Population .63 M
Comparison - Projected
.36 m .18 initial m .18 initial M
.63 ultimate 1*
Full Time Staff 42
38 32
Service Desks Staffed (9)
32
(9)
m m
Hours of OperationlWcek 68
68 68
68
Branch Library Impact (n
WI Gal 0.8)
ni
NOTE: Each option would have an initial collection of 10D,000 volumes a $21.0D/vol. = $2,100,000. initial cost for boots.
m
(1) Fr®L RW g
Q) CitO- Cil] -4l
It) ribvmYWY / 'rlaliri�f ssaWi
a
(3) Msm Wnq s48r Wft.W ear
• sbeleaalpnelu. aPr+iadhmrie. and or..la smies.
Cha&
C3 oft 0 ldsSO. 6➢is, assW, lrlrs AW10 Ymi
<t0 o.ta.a..raa..a�tYA00rID:.ao0a MZ.V Yw«y�.e�g1w+�cer�
(O Uimfm S -F. adm�l4,,I�Ia 113.000.
(111 7Y IU1IYw1/rp�we iF isA �i./�rasMYii,r�W
F
F�� �01^1�W 12y�ysdvr.dlfr.000d�4.'Y,q
(13) Wi ,sf ewb of Ccmi)d .biw
=;tp �ee�f cw Wises br l� W 4b. fa Dori
(r) Cimdsdo�, Rs .sDreO
Total 26 Months 40 Months 32 Months 40 Months
NOTE: Each individual line item cost includes contractor Overhead and Profit, bonds, and insurance_
(11 lrcbe6u+.apuktgrr Pbn tsvd .adcmd Plm.
c1 Iand.sties.enurnwv.n :n¢n. n. oe l�
HIw'oue°"°"°°"r'°d"'p t2 CVA w°e("eW •,t.s'md, bGC .ipalr.a+, dd«t rs)
(st leeu,a., c.eer Ism ei?).e.0.1km n em. h.ah ..
(6) <-W'dd'd A of dt� Ya 20% CRQ JI at bAr•.
(7) wd". b- altmrao* w1.n l�/s ;30.000 J.F.
(s) h lam a.�r :r t�,o.,�r� n.n. vr.,a -A homer foe ee&ed
(31 IxOedslidF1'+ka r..t N1,000 J.F.'ao,m6kq�.� dyed
(10) O&Nre6 r 70%ar Ok*. A ZZ(k) k. o%uab
(111 ImWece rum wru^�I+Mb 4¢
(1131 3)
( 7ncewue bvi lraor.M�or..ntr ra
naeasri; ,ri.laa:Qil.»w.�i` -. ,�r �f4107..e. stew eir �.,m si ,vey
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION RUDGKr
COMPARISON
Mal, 20, 1992
Option One
d
135,000 p.S.F_
Library
ODUM Two
'75,000 G.S.F.
Library
Option 71ic
135,000 S -F. Shill
Q%kA Farr
38,000 G -S.F.
Call Item
Library a 30,000
Library 30,000
Building
20,295,328.("
12,005,976.(")
10,028,772. m
5,700,00D.
Landscape
3,154,458.
3,242,563.02)
1,919,140.(a
1,992,140.
Paricing
497,250. m
409,145. nn
497,250.14
497,250.0
Off -Sites
1,266,498.131
1,266,498.
1,266,498. M
1,266,498. m
F.F. & E.
4,470,102. M
3,375,000. (^
789,750. "1
789,750.
On-Site Utilities
692,422. (s1
692,422.
692,422. m
692,422.
GrMin8
596,700.
568,620. nn
596,700_
596,70D-
Sub-Total
30,972,758.
21,560,224.
15,790,532.
11,534,760, J
10% Contingency
% Y
3,097,276.
2 156 022
1,579,053.
1,153,476.
■
TOW
34,070,033.
23,716,246.
17,369,585.
12,686,236.
Fees
2,180,482.0
1,897,299. ('�
1,621,734.110
1,015,000.05)
Grand Total
36,250,515.
25,613,545.
18,991,319.
13,703,236.
Construction
11 top Offi
Option Two
O_ ut"
tin Four
E
Program
6 Months
6 Months
6 Months
°'-
Design/Construction
Documents
8 Months
16 Months
8 Months
16 Months
Construction
18 Months
18 Months
18 Months
18 Months
Total 26 Months 40 Months 32 Months 40 Months
NOTE: Each individual line item cost includes contractor Overhead and Profit, bonds, and insurance_
(11 lrcbe6u+.apuktgrr Pbn tsvd .adcmd Plm.
c1 Iand.sties.enurnwv.n :n¢n. n. oe l�
HIw'oue°"°"°°"r'°d"'p t2 CVA w°e("eW •,t.s'md, bGC .ipalr.a+, dd«t rs)
(st leeu,a., c.eer Ism ei?).e.0.1km n em. h.ah ..
(6) <-W'dd'd A of dt� Ya 20% CRQ JI at bAr•.
(7) wd". b- altmrao* w1.n l�/s ;30.000 J.F.
(s) h lam a.�r :r t�,o.,�r� n.n. vr.,a -A homer foe ee&ed
(31 IxOedslidF1'+ka r..t N1,000 J.F.'ao,m6kq�.� dyed
(10) O&Nre6 r 70%ar Ok*. A ZZ(k) k. o%uab
(111 ImWece rum wru^�I+Mb 4¢
(1131 3)
( 7ncewue bvi lraor.M�or..ntr ra
naeasri; ,ri.laa:Qil.»w.�i` -. ,�r �f4107..e. stew eir �.,m si ,vey
E4 4 IL
I. Negotiation for Revenue Retention
A. Upon the effective date of withdrawal, the City assumes
the responsibility for financing local public library
service.
B. The City must enter into negotiations with the county for
the reallocation to the City of the property taxes
previously collected within the City for County Library
purposes.
1) The City needs to ascertain the amount of property
tax money involved.
2) The City needs to negotiate for any remaining grant
money or augmentation funds held by the County.
II. Exploration of Other Funding Sources
A. State grants
B. Federal funds
C. Mello -Roos Community Facilities District
D. Special library tax
III. organization of a Municipal Library
A. Adoption of an establishing ordinance
B. Appointment of a Board of Library Trustees
C. Adoption of basic rules and regulations for the
administration of the library
IV. Withdrawal from the San Bernardino county Library
A. Publication at least once a week for two successiva weeks
prior to giving notice that the action of withdrawal from
the County system is being contemplated. Notice should
contain the date and place of the meeting at which the
contemplated action is proposed to be taken.
B. Notification of withdrawal must be given to the county
Board of supervisors on or before January 1. This is
Iq3
accompanied by a statement complying with Chapter 8 of
Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 25 of the Government Code,
C. Adoption of a resolution stating the City's intent to
establish a municipal library - This is not necessary,
but recommended by our Consultant.
D. Adopt a detailed ordinance spelling out the specifics of
the municipal library, its governance and other
provisions.
V. Interim operating Issues - Possible scenarios
A. Contract with the County Library to continue service on
a temporary basis
S. Lease or otherwise contract for the continued use of the
present facility
C. Employ library staff to operate the library and contract
with the County Library for use of the collections.
D. continue contracting with the County for library service
until the city can establish a new library in a temporary
building operated by its own library personnel and
stocked with its own collections.
)yy
l.11I Ur nAlNunv U UVA➢IViNkjA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 3, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Debbie Adams, City Clerk
SUBJECT; REMOVAL OF CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D5
a �
�` 3I %n
� t
Please remove City Council Agenda item D5 from the Consent Calendar, as
staff has requested this item be continued to the July 1, 1992 City
Council meeting.
/dja
cc: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager
�,�,k2Frfn D%
RESOLUTION NO. 1(�-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY
CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has
initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received
a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax
in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter
2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of
California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to
as
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1
(Day Creek Drainage System)
(hereinafter referred to as the "District "); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes
of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by
Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized
the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said
Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish
the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next Fiscal Year.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct,
SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax
to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1994 -98 j IJ
for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in
the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A ".
SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the
amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is
not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the
District.
23
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88 -2
(DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency "), has
initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received
a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax
in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the 'Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter
2.5. Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of
California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to
as
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2
(Drainage and Law Enforcement)
(hereinafter referred to as the "District "); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes
of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by
Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized
the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said
Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish
the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
TC ION 22: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax
to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year
1992/93 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set
forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit W.
SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the
amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is
not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the
District.
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to
pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of
priority:
A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding
authorized bonded indebtedness; and
B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other
reserve funds; and
C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities
and public services; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate.
The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not
be used for any other purpose.
SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner
as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the
same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad
valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonal4e
administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.
SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the
Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund.
ES C,I,ION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter
in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite
each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements,
special tax or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special
tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the
attached Exhibit "A ".
SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax
collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the
amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and
percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a
statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such
collection.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2
EXHIBIT "A'
The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of
the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
SPECIAL TAX "A:'- DRAIN -!= FAC=M --
PROPERTY CATEGORIES
There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A ", which are Identified
as follows:
I. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax ASsessors's parcel
for which property a building permit has been issued as of
May 31 of any year.
2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERLY All other property, excluding property which, as of the
date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:,
is: (I) owned by a public entity: III) owned by a regulated
public utility and being utilized for transmission or
distribution purposes: or lid) zoned as open space.
TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND
SPECIAL TAR "A" RATES
The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A"
rates for Fiscal Year 1992/93 are as follows:
Taixin¢ Classtficatio
Tax Rate
L DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A.
Residential Class 1
$944 per year
(More than 3,590 square feel of
dwelling unit living area)
D.
Residential it
8699 per year
(3,077 -3,589 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
C.
Residential iii
8524 per year
(2,564 -3,076 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
D.
Residential Class IV
$420 per year
(2,308 -2.563 square feet of
dwelling unit living areal
Taxing Classification
2.
E. Residential Class V
(2.051 -2,307 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
F. Residential Class VI
(less than 2.051 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) •
Commercial or industrial property
T :%DEVELOPED PROPERTY
All Undeveloped Property
Tax_ Raig
$349 per year
$245 per year
52,030 per acre per year ••
$1.344 per acre per year •••
The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of
internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space,
as shown on the building permitls) issued for the dwelling unit.
The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage
exclusive o: any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency.
The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any
acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency.
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL. TAX "A"
Special Tax "A' shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above
Identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A' revenues are necessary to pay
authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of
authorized public facilities, which may Include. without limitation, payment of debt service on
anv bonded Indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required
reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness; funding of any required sinking fund necessary
to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities ICFD
Expenses'].
The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows:
STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses
which must be paid for from Special Tax "A" revenues collected during the Fiscal
Year for which the Special Tax 'A' levy is to be established (the "Required
Special Tax 'A' Revenue').
STEP 2'. That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate. not to exceed 91% of the
maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property
Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax 'X revenue In the
Fiscal Year of the lew equal to the Required Special Tax W Revenue for such
Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property.
STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A' revenues are still necessary to generate the
Required Special Tax "A" Revenue. that percentage of the maximum authorized
Special Tae "A' rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to
generate such additional Special Tax 'A' revenue shall be levied on all
Undeveloped Property.
STEP 4: If additional Special Tax 'A" revenues are still necessary to generate the
Required Special. Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum
authored Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing
Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue
shall be levied on all Developed Property.
STEP 5: If additional Special Tax A' revenues are still necessary to generate the
Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall:
A. Compare (I) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each
Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (it) the
product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed
Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A ". The Base Maximum
Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square foot of the
lot or parcel.
B. if the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax W rate
described in (I) above for any Developed Property, the Community
Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax 'A:' rate levied on each
such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed
the product described in (u) above necessary- to generate the additional
Special Tax 'A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues.
SPECIAL TAX "S' - LAW 0"RCEMEM
All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax ' B ". The authorized Special
Tax B" rates for Fiscal Year 1992 -1993 are as follows:
klk9iliRM7F.'RTilfGklidTil
DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class 1
$1 per year
(More than 3.590 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
B. Residential Class 11
$1 per year
(3.077 -3.589 square feet of
dwelling unit living areal
C. Residential Class Ili
$1 per year
(2,564 -3,076 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
D. Residential Class W
$1 per year
(2.308 -2,563 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
E. Residential Class V
$1 per year
(2,051 -2.307 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) -
F. Residential Class VI
$1 per year
(Less than 2,051 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES
OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2
OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1x "r Nom, S!Y
1!
Y
1
O , 5 C. E.
. G T . Tl•T�T�T. ''rte
I
a - ,
1
2a IN ST EETT
.
♦
+a.n
1.
SCALE 1' a 640'
LECCMQ_
+ 1
xvn •�.. ,... !!r
ti �� r [Nn Y30 > M m +n > u You; •i yv>r.
a
I "-23,0.761 I
uR, :;Ir.r. v. y �ti u. vwY Y MYY1, v ; y. r •.�T :,R.'V
Ft tl� >�+IK X.�.�.
ti �� r [Nn Y30 > M m +n > u You; •i yv>r.
a
I "-23,0.761 I
Roll Call:
CITY OF
RANCHO UrA MONGP,
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA
Adiourned Meeting
June 4, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Tri- Communities Conference Room
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
A, CALL TO ORDER
Buquet __, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright _.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
C, COMMUNICATION FROM THE PEI
BLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the
Redevelopment Agency. State law prohibits the Redevelopment Agency
from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The
Redevelopment Agency may receive testimony and s et the matter for a
subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limiled to five minutes per
individual.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
June 4, 1992
Page 2
D. ADJOURNMENT
1, Debra J. Adams, Assistant Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on May 29, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
1. Roll Call:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Adjourned Meeting
June 4, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Tri- Communities Conference Room
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
A. CALL TO ORDER
Buquet _, Alexander __, Stout __, Williams _, Wright —
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
C. COMMUN /CATION FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place
for
the general public to
address the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection
District. State law prohibits the District
from addressing any issue
not
previously included on
the Agenda. The
District may receive testimony
and set the matter
for a subsequent
meeting, Comments are to
be
limited to five minutes
per individual.
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AGENDA
June 4, 1992
Page 2
D. ADIOURNMF.NT
1, Debra J. Adams, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on May 29, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
o� CITY OF
RA�IICTIO C:U AM(X X A
CITY COUNCIL
U AGENM
1977
diourned Meeting
June 4, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Tri- Communities Conference Room
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
A, CALL TO ORDER
I'. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Roll Call:
Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright _.
B. ITEM OF DISCUSSIOv
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
This is the time and place for
Council. State
the general
public
to address the City
law prohibits the City Council
not previously included on the Agenda. The
from
addressing any issue
testimony and set the matter for
a subsequent
City
meeting.
Council may receive
Comments
be limited to fire minutes per
individual.
are to
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
June 4, 1992
Page 2
D. AD.IOURNMENT
f, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
May 29, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.