HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/05/20 - Agenda Packet/O
QTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMCa'VGA
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
May 20, 1981
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead-
line for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and
third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Flag salute.
B. Roll Call: Frost k , Mikels__&_, Palombo_t , Bridged, and Schlosser )y.
C. Approval of Minutes: April 9 and April 15, 1981.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
• a. May 28, 6:30 p.m. - Advisory Commission Meeting, Lion's Park Community
Center, 9161 Base Line.
b. June 4, 6:30 p.m. - Storm Drain Committee, Lion's Park Community Center,
9161 Base Line.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -5 -20 for $338,147.79. 1
b. Forward Claim against the City by Gerry Johns to the City 4
Attorney for handling,
c. Intention to Vacate Cleveland Avenue. It is recommended 7
that Council approve the resolution of intention to vacate
Cleveland Avenue between 7th and 8th Street and set
June 17, 1981 for public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -68 8
® A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IN-
TENTION TO VACATE CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 7TH
AND 8TH STREET.
City Council Agenda -2- May 20, 1981
• d. City Engineer's Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District 14
No. 1. Recommend that Council approve the City Engineer's Report
and set June 3, 1981 for public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -69 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITH-
IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND
PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -70
20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I.
e. Approval of Contract for Professional Services to Prepare
21
Environmental Impact Report for Public Review of Industrial
• Assessment District 79 -1.
f. Pipe Line License. Recommend that Council authorize the subject
36
resolution for the acceptance of the maintenance of a pipe and
related appurtenances for storm drainage that is required to be
installed in railroad right -of -way by Rancho Haven Associates,
developer: located at the southeast corner of Haven and 8th.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -71
37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PIPE LINE LICENSE AT UTICA STREET CROSSING
UNDER THE SANTA FE RAILROAD.
g Advertising Paving Contract for Resurfacing and Replacing of
43
Damaged Pavement, Recommend that Council approve the contract
for pavingand resurfacing of damaged streets at miscellaneous
locations throughout the City.
h. Authorization to Seek Bids for City -wide Emergency and Normal
45
Equipment Pavement Repair. Recommend that Council authorize
the seeking of bids for emergency and normal equipment pave-
ment repair, shoulder grading and debris removal maintenance
to supplement City forces in time of need,
�,�gp'itntended
�-i. Carnelian Landscape Project. Recommend that Council give
47
its authorization to transfer appropriate - reserve funds into
a general account for construction and also authorize the
seeking of bids for materials and to recruit temporary personnel.
• City Council Agenda -3- May 20, 1981
j.
Advertising of Contract for City -wide Landscape and
48
Irrigation Maintenance. It is recommended that City Council
approve advertising for bids to provide parkway maintenance
services for the 1981 -82 fiscal year.
k.
Advertising of Contract for City -wide Street Tree Service for
49
1981 -82. Recommend that Council approve advertising for bids
to provide parkway maintenance services for the 1981 -82 fiscal
year with possible extension into the 1982 -83 fiscal year.
1.
Acceptance of Parcel Map 4773 and Real Improvement Contract
50
and Lien Agreement, Recommend that Council accept Parcel Map
4773 and Real Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, located
on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of 24th Street sub-
mitted by Gary and Cecelia Kortepeter. (Item had been submitted
and removed from the February 18, 1981 City Council Agenda).
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -72
51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 4773 AND REAL PROPERTY IMPROVE-
MENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT.
m.
Acceptance of Parcel Map 6544, Bonds, and Agreements:
58
located on 19.9 acres of land at the northeast corner of
Haven and 6th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -73
59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 6544 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6544)
6544), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
n.
Acceptance of Map, Bonds, and Agreements for Parcel Map 6617:
60
located northeast corner of Haven and Arrow Route.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -74
62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 6617, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
6617), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
o,
Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Conditional Use Permit
63
No. 81 -04.
Faithful Performance Bond $47,000
Labor d Material 23,500
E
City Council Agenda -4- May 20, 1981
RESOLUTION NO. 81- 75 64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR C.U.P. 81 -04.
p. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security 71
for Conditional Use Permit 80 -02.
Faithful Performance Bond $55,000
Labor S Material Bond 27,500
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -76 72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR C.U.P, 80 -02
r. Purchase of Real Property by County Flood Control. 79
It is recommended that Council authorize the Mayor to sign
each copy of the agreements and the City Clerk to attest to
. the same. Also, direct the City Clerk to return each document
to Joe Bell, County Tax Collector.
s, Street Name Change Request. It is recommended that Council 88
adopt a resolution making the following street name changes:
Sequoia Avenue to Civic Center Drive
Vincent Avenue to Maple Place
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -77 90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING
THE STREET NAME OF SEQUOIA AVENUE TO CIVIC
CENTER DRIVE AND VINCENT AVENUE TO MAPLE
PLACE.
t. Set Public Hearing on June 3, 1981 for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE GRO14TH MANAGEMENT PLAN, An amendment
to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, amending Chapter 17.04,
Section 17.04.080, to eliminate the tri- annual review period
and allow projects to be filed on an open basis.
u. Set Public Hearing on June 3, 1981 for AN AMENDMENT TO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -74: amending definition of affordable housing
per the General Plan.
9
•
City Council Agenda -5- May 20, 1981
v. Phase II of North Town Street Improvements, Recommend that 91
Council approve the seeking of bids for the construction of
Phase II of the North Town. Street Improvements.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. PLANNED COMMUNITY 80 -01 - VICTORIA. A Planned Community
consisting of + ,00 acres of and encompassing residential, �-
commercial, and regional shopping center located generally
south of Highland,Avnub, north of Base Line Road and Foothill
Boulevard, east of the Deer Creek Channel at the Edison
corridor, and west of Etiwanda Avenue.
ORDINANCE NO. 143 (second reading) 92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
Tu
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNIT" P.C. 80 -01 LOCATED
SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE GENERALLY NORTH OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GENERALLY WEST OF ETI-
WANDA AVENUE.
B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING A STREET NAMING 93
POLICY. A policy for new pub is an private streets in t e
city in the interest of uniformity and to avoid confusion to•,14'
the public; and a policy for changing existing street names.
ORDINANCE NO. 144 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURES FOR STREET NAMING.
C. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. 97
ORDINANCE NO. 145 (second reading)
1%
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY `r ;
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE
NEED FOR A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO FUNCTION IN
THE COMMUNITY.
0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -14 - 98
=1 YHE_ROBERTS GROUP. A change of zone rom R- - ,50 sing e
family residential) to R -3 -PD (multiple family /planned
development) for the development of a planned development
consisting of 76 condominiums on 6,4 acres of land located
on the west side of Hermosa Street approximately 330 feet
north of 19th Street. APN 202- 171 -20 & 38.
City Council Agenda -6- May
20, 1981
•
ORDINANCE NO. 146 (first reading)
141
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 171 -20 & 38 FROM
R -1 -8,500 TO R -3 -PD FOR 6.4 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH
OF 19TH STREET,
E. CHAFFEY HUMANE SOCIETY PROPOSED INCREASE IN DOG LICENSE FEES
142
FOR-1981-82.
Betty Fryman, General Manager of the Chaffey Humane Society,
will be present to request City Council authorization to
increase dog license fees, rabies vaccination fees, and
impound /board fees.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
150
81-01. Amending the-R-1 permitted uses, adding a minimum
dwelling width and depth, and requiring a design review for
all dwellings; to implement SB -1960.
. ORDINANCE NO. 123 -A (first reading)
163
. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION,
,,f,Lt'
X.
61.024A OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 123 BY ADDING SECTIONS 61.024A (a)
(6), 61.024(8), AND 61.024(h) TO PROVIDE FOR
MOBILEHOMES WITHIN THE R -1 ZONE, MINIMUM DWELLING
UNIT WIDTHS, AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL
DWELLINGS.
G. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 16.24, FINANCING
165
FOR INTERIM SCHOOLS.
The ordinance would require mob ilehomes when placed on indi-
vidual lets to be subject to the same school fees as tradi-
tional single family homes in all of the school districts,
ORDINANCE NO, 147 (first reading)
166
`i.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
f RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO
- CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 16.24 FINANCING
•1
FOR INTERIM SCHOOLS, SECTION 16.24.080 AMOUNT OF
FEES, TO REQUIRE THAT MOBILEHOMES ON SINGLE FAMILY
LOTS BE CLASSIFIED AS A SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLING TO
PAY THE ESTABLISHED FEE FOR SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS.
19 H. AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE,_ CHAPTER 3,24, PARKS AND RE_CREA- 167
III 0N TAX.
The ordinance would require mobilehomes to be subject to
the same park and recreation tax as traditional single family
homes when placed on individual lots.
City Council Agenda -7- May 20, 1981
• ORDINANCE N0.'M (first reading) 168
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE i
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 3.24
PARKS AND RECREATION TAX, SECTION 3.24.040 TAX -
AMOUNT, TO REQUIRE A MOBILE HOME UNIT ON INDIVI-
DUAL LOTS TO PAY THE PARK TAX EQUAL TO A SINGLE -
FAMILY DWELLING - $300.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
,_A.-'STORM
DRAIN REIMBURSEMENT POLICY. Staff repor' by Lloyd Hubbs.
169
A request from the owner of Tract 11606 to establish a drain-
age reimbursement district for the reimbursement of cost of
drainage improvements required for the tract.
B.
STATUS OF STREETS AND HIGHWAY NEEDS AND SUPPORT OF SENATE
17R
BILL 215. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Senate Bill 215, authored by Senator Foran will
increase the gasoline tax by two cents.
•
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -78
181
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 215 TO INCREASE FUNDS
FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE
' STATE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.
C.
CONSULTANT'S REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT OF FISCAL MODEL.
_ 191
An oral report will be presented by a representative
T—
from MKGK, the consultant for the project.
D.
PARK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. A report by Bill Holley.
The park implementation plan addresses the manner and method
as well as financial considerations involved in develop-
ing Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Park system.
E.
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL TO CREATE A COMMITTEE TO SELECT
205
REDEVELOPMEfIT CONSULTANT. Staff report y ac am.
Staff has prepared "Requests for Proposals" to be submitted
to consultants who specialize in redevelopment work to pre-
the to be consistent with the State
\00-
pare program package
Redevelopment Law. Staff recommends that the City Council
appoint a Committee to select a consultant.
City Council Agenda -8- May 20, 1981
•
F. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO EMPLOY ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES. Staff 211
report by Lauren Wasserman.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the expendi-
tures for architectural services needed in the preliminary
stages of the civic center design. It is anticipated that
the consulting services will begin at the time the city and
county purchase land for the civic center. At the time land
is purchased, it is recommended that Gilbert Aja and Associates
contract with the city on an hourly basis to determine the
scope of the civic center project and the fixed fees for
complete architectural services. The primary reason for using
Gilbert Aja and Associates is that firm has been employed by
the Daon Corp. The firm understands the architectural limi-
tations of the site and will make certain that the civic center
design is compatible witty surrounding properties. In addition,
it should be noted that Mr. Aja has been employed by the Daon
Corp. and has been involved in preliminary work on the civic
center site on behalf of the Daon Corp.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Manager be l�'r•'l` "�
authorized to execute the appropriate documents on behalf
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the services of
Gilbert Aja and Associates for design of the civic center
• facilities. City Council will have an opportunity to review
the proposal for complete architectural services at a later
date.
G. REQUEST TO APPROVE SAN BERNARDINO'S SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 213
MASTER PLAN, Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
Item has been continued from the January 14, 1981 City Council
meeting. At that time, concern was expressed that the report
submitted did not adequately deal with the disposal of hazard -
ours waste materials. Since that time, however, both the
County Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee and the
Southern California Association of Governments have acted to
plan for the disposal of hazardous wastes.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -6 217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
REVISED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGE-
MENT MASTER PLAN.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
7. ADJOURNMENT.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community
Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, May 20, 1981. The
meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led
in the flag salute.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur
H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also Present: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Deputy City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director,
Jack Lam; City Planner, Barry Hogan; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director,
Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley.
Approval of Minutes: Councilman Frost requested that the words, "at a future
meeting" be deleted from the motion to present Mrs. Gorczyca, Laura Jones, and
Jorge Garcia city plaques as stated on page three of the April 15 minutes.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve the minutes of April
9 and April 15, 1981 as amended. The motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS,
A. Opening on the Historical Commirsion: Councilman Frost suggested that the
Council establish a screening process since he did not know one of the applicants
at all. Council concurred with this suggestion and appointed Jon Mikels and Art
Bridge to proceed with the screening and bring their recommendations back to
Council.
B. Mr. Wasserman announced that at the next meeting there would be a recommenda-
tion before Council for consideration regarding the Etiwanda Specific Plan. There
would be an Advisory Committee to select plus some goals, etc. Councilman Frost,
along with some of the others on the Council, stated that they wanted to get with
staff regarding the formulation of these recommendations. Mr. Wasserman said
staff would be in contact with each individual councilman during the formulation
process in order to obtain all their input.
C. Mayor Schlosser announced that he, along with the city engineer, city manager,
and Councilman Frost, attended a meeting with the Board of Supervisors. The item
under discussion was the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel. In order to complete
the project, there was a need for $5.9 million by the let of July. The County does
not have the funds to complete the project.
D. Mr. Wasserman announced the following changes in the agenda:
Removal of consent calendar items "g" and "i ". Removal of Staff Report
items 5A and 5G.
Add staff report item 5H, Authorization to seek bids for the purchase of
a vehicle.
"Section 2: That the Citv Council hereby declares its intent to consider the
vacation of Cleveland Avenue..... etc." Also, to make the same change in the title
of the Resolution.
Council asked for clarification reports on items h, j, k, and v.
Councilman Frost asked for a report also on item "e" since it involved a $9000
expenditure. He said he would not oppose this one at this time, but wanted a
more detailed staff report on future requests. (Mr. Hobbs answered his questions
regarding item "e ").
The following Consent Calendar was presented:
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -5 -20 for $338,147,79.
b. Forward Claim against the City by Gerry Johns to the City Attorney for
handling.
c• Consideration of Vacation of Clevelend Avenue. It is recommended that Council
approve the resolution of intention to consider the vacation of Cleveland
Avenue between 7th and 8th Streets and set June 17, 1981 for public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENT TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE
BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH STREETS.
d. City Engineer's Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1.
Recommend that Council approve the City Engineer's Report and set June 17,
1981 for public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITH-
IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND
PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1.
e. Approval of Contract for Professional Services to Prepare Environmental
Impact Report for Public Review of Industrial Assessment District 79 -1.
f. Pipe Line License. Recommend that Council authorize the subject resolu-
tion for the acceptance of the maintenance of a pipe and related appurten-
ances for storm drainage that is required to be installed in railroad
right -of -way by Rancho Havon Associates, developer: located at the south-
east corner of Haven and 8th Street.
A or l ., UP 1
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PIPE LINE LICENSE AT UTICA STREET CROSSING
UNDER THE SANTA FE RAILROAD.
Removed by staff.
h. Authorization to Seek Bids for city -wide Emergency and Normal Equipment Pave-
ment Repair. Recommend that Council authorize the seeking of bids for emergency
and normal equipment pavement repair, shoulder grading and debris removal.
Maintenance intended to supplement city forces in time of need.
#--- 6R£ne # #an- $egdseepe- Pre} eeE.-- Reeenunertd- theE- 6etlne # }_g }ve- #!s- etlEhet #set #eR
€ e- E£ dqa€ et- 8p8Fep£# a{ e-£ eBBFVe-€ tlgda-# REe- B-$ eqe £P, }- 8eeetlq #- €aF- e8fl8EFtle { #aR
aqd- a #se- eeEhe£ #ee -Ehe- seek# ng- eE_ q# de- 8e£- wa{ e£ #e }a- afld- ee- tee£R #{- Eempe£a£y
peteenae}. Removed by staff.
j. Advertising of Contract for city -wide Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance.
It is recommended that City Council approve advertising for bids to provide
parkway maintenance services for the 1981 -82 fiscal year.
k. Advertising of Contract for city -wide Street Tree Service for 1981 -82. Rec-
ommend that Council approve advertising for bids to provide parkway maintenace
services for the 1981 -82 fiscal year with possible extension into the 1982 -83
fiscal year.
1. Acceptance of Parcel Map 4773 and Real Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement.
Recommend that Council accept Parcel Map 4773 and Real Improvement Contract
and Lien Agreement, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of 24th
Street submitted by Gary and Ceclia Rortepeter. (Item had been submitted
and removed from the February 18, 1981 City Council agenda).
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 4773 AND REAL PROPERTY IMPROVE-
MENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT.
M. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6544, Bonds, and Agreements: located on 19.9 acres
of land at the northeast corner of Haven and 6th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 6544 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
6544), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
n. Acceptance of Map, Bonds, and Agreements for Parcel Map 6617: located
northeast corner of Haven and Arrow Route.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -74
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 6617, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO,
6617), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
ai
Labor & Material Bond 23,500
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR C.U.P. 81 -04.
p. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Conditional
Use Permit 80 -02.
Faithful Performance Bond $55,000
Labor & Material Bond 27,500
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -76.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR C.U.P. 80 -02.
r. Purchase of Real Property by County Flood Control. It is recommended that
Council authorize the Mayor to sign each copy of the agreement and the
Citv Clerk to attest to the same. Also, direct the City Clerk to return
each document to Joe Bell, County Tax Collector.
s. Street Name Change Request. It is recommended that Council adopt a resolu-
tion making the following street name changes!
Sequoia Avenue to Civic Center Drive, and
Vincent Avenue to Maple Place
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE
STREET NAME OF SEQUOIA AVENUE TO CIVIC CENTER
DRIVE AND VINCENT AVENUE TO MAPLE PLACE.
t. Set Public Hearing on June 3, 1981 for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AN
AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. An Amendment to the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, amending Chapter 17.04, Section 17.04.080, to
eliminate the tri- annual review period and allow projects to be filed on an
open basis.
U. Set Public Hearing on June 3, 1981 for AN AMENDMENT TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
NO. 79 -74: amending definition of a.-fordable housing per the General Plan.
v. Phase II of North Town Street Improvements. Recommend that Council approve the
seeking of bids for the construction of Phase II of the North Town Street
Improvements.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar with
the exceptions of items "g" and "I" which had been removed by staff. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0.
4A. PLANNED COMMUNITY 80 -01 - VICTORIA. A Planned Community consisting of +2,000
acres of land encompassing residential, commercial, and regional shopping center
located generally south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road and Foothill
Boulevard, east of the Deer Creek Channel at the Edison corridor, and west of
Etiwanda Avenue.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 143.
ORDINANCE NO. 143 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
PLANNED COMMUNITY P.C. 80 -01 LOCATED SOUTH OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE GENERALLY NORTH OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND GENERALLY WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordin-
ance No. 143. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being n, response,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Bridge to approve Ordinance No. 143. Motion
carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Schlosser.
NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
.n. U"INANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING A STREET NAMING POLICY. A policy
for new public and private streets in the city in the interest of uniformitv and
to avoid confusion to the public; a policy for changing existing street names.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 144.
ORDINANCE NO. 144 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURES FOR STREET NAMING.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed.
Councilman Bridge expressed a dislike for the name of 19th Street. He felt it
should revert back to the original name of Olive Street. Staff stated they would
look into this.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve Ordinance No. 144.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, P =lombo, Bridge, and
Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
4C. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No, 145.
Y UC
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE
NEED FOR A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO FUNCTION IN
THE COMMUNITY.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordin-
ance No. 145. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 145. Motion
carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser.
NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
4D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -14 - THE ROBERTS GROUP.
A change of zone from R -1 -8,500 (single family residential) to R -3 -PD (multiple f:.mily/
planned development) for the development of a planned development consisting of 76
condominiums on 6.4 acres of land located on the west side of Hermosa Street approxi-
mately 330 feet north of 19th Street. APN 202 - 171 -20 S 38. Barry Hogan presented the
staff report.
Mr. Hogan read a letter of protest which had been received from Laurel Hawker in
which she expressed her concerns regarding the increased flooding problems, the
narrow streets,and traffic density.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 146.
ORDINANCE NO. 146 (first reading)
A.N ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 171 -20 6 38 FROM R -1 -8,500 TO
R -3 -PD FOR 6.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF 19TH STREET.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set June 3, 1981 for second
reading.
4E. CHAFFEY HUMANE SOCIETY PROPOSED INCREASE IN DOG LICENSE FEES FOR 1981 -82.
Mr. Empey introduced Betty Fryman, General Manager of the Chaffey Humane Society,
who presented a request to Council for authorization to increase dog license fees,
rabie vaccination fees, and impound /board fees.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the suggested increase
in fees and to instruct staff to draft a Resolution establishing the fee increases
for adoption at the next meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
the sea i report
Mr. Vairin said that SR-1960 would go into effect July 1, 1981. He said it was
imperative to have something on our books before this time otherwis,a applications
could be submitted, and they would have to be granted.
Councilman Mikels asked where on the map would the mobile homes he permitted. He
said that although the ordinance states in lots of 7200 square feet or less, he
wanted to know where these were located. He said perhaps the surrounding zonings
would not be compatible. He requested that at the next meeting a map be provided
showing exactly where the mobile homes could be placed in the city.
Mr. Lam pointed out that the law allows us to have a design review process which
we already have. If anyone wanted to place a mobile home on a residential lot,
they would have to go through the design review process. Tn this way, we could
determine whether a mobile home was compatible with the surrounding areas.
Mr. Dougherty said that according to the State law, the city shall not prohibit
mobile homes on single family lots if they are placed on a permanent foundation,
and they are certified under the Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standards
Act of 1974. Then the law proceeds to permit us to implement a design review and
compatibility standards, etc. He said if we don't adopt an ordinance, then we are
left wide open to having the possibility of a mobile home placed on any residential
lot.
Councilman ! %'eels said his concern was that the Design Review Committee would not
be able to control where these homes would be permitted as the ordinance stated
and they would end up not being compatible in all 7200 square foot lots with
surrounding uses.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 123 -A.
ORDINANCE NO. 123 -A (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
61.024A OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 123 BY ADDING SECTIONS 61.024A(a)
(6), 61.024(g), AND 61.024(h) TO PROVIDE FOR
MOBILEHOMES WITHIN THE R -1 ZONE, MINIMUM DWELLING
UNIT WIDTHS, AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL
DWELLINGS.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set June 3, 1981 for second reading.
4G. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 16.24. FINANCING FOR INTERIM SCHOOLS.
The ordinance would require mobilehomes when placed on individual lots to be
subject to the same school fees as traditional single family homes in all of the
school districts. Staff report by Michael Vairin.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 69 -B,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 16.24 FINANCING
FOR INTERIM SCHOOLS, SECTION 16.24.080 AMOUNT OF
FEES, TO REQUIRE THAT MOBILEHOMES ON SINGLE FAMILY
LOTS BE CLASSIFIED AS A SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLINGS.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 69 -B. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed. Mayor set June 3, 1981 for second readio�.
4H. AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 3.24 PARKS AND RECRETATION TAX. The
ordinance would require mobilehomes to be subject to the same park and recreation
tax as traditional single family homes when placed on individual lots. Michael
Vairin presented the staff report.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 8 -C.
ORDINANCE NO. 8 -C (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 3.24 PARKS AND
RECREATION TAX, SECTION 3.24.040 TAX AMOUNT, TO
REQUIRE A MOBILE HOME UNIT ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS TO
PAY THE PARK T ?X EQUAL TO A SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLING -
$300.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set June 3, 1981 for second reading.
Mavor Schlosser called a recess at 8:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:55 p.m.
with all members of Council and staff present.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
5Ac-- Sf6RM- BRnfN- REfHBtlftSt:YENf- PBtf6Ys - -A- request -from- the - owner -of- Tract- }}666 -to
eatab}}ah-a- drainage -re}mbararment- d }atr}ee -for- the- re}mbaraemenl- ef- eeae- ef- drein-
ege- impreremenfe- regn}red- for -ehe- !reel. Item removed from the Agenda by staff.
5B. STATUS OF STREETS AND HIGHWAY NEEDS AND SUPPORT OF SENATE BILL 215. An oral
report with a slide presentation was made by Lloyd Hubbs.
The slides depicted the present condition of the roads in Rancho Cucamonga. After
the slide presentation, Mr. Hobbs introduced Resolution No. 81 -78. He encouraged
Council to approve the Resolution which would increase the gasoline tax by two cents.
He said that not only did the State need the extra funds for roads and highways, but
our city as well. Although the two cents was not even a "drop in the bucket ", it
was felt it was better than nothing.
Mayor Schlosser asked if there were any public comments. There were none.
leg wi .
successfully until funds were available. He said they could be financed through
assessment districts, but there is general opposition to this method.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. 81 -78 with
the understanding that it is a compromise bill and insufficient to take care of
the problems the State has, and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by
the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Palumbo.
ABSENT: None. (Palombo stated he was not in favor since it lacked clear definition
as to where the funding would be coming from as far as the city was concerned.
Mikels stated he approved the Resolution with reservations).
Citv Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -78.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 215 TO INCREASE FUNDS
FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.
5C. CONSULTANT'S REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT OF FISCAL MODEL. An oral report was
presented by Kent Meek, the consultant from MKGK.
mKGK had prepared and developed the fiscal model for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The development . was now complete, and this was the final presentation to Council.
The fiscal model was an information resource tool which would simulate the re-
sults of decisions made about land use or fiscal issues.
Council received and filed the report.
5D. PARK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.
The park implementation plan was presented by Bill Holley. The plan addressed the
manner and method as well as financial considerations involved in developing
Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal park system.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to proceed with the Plan and to
authorize staff to proceed with the implementation of the plan. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0.
5E. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL TO CREATE A COMMITTEE TO SELECT REDEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANT. Staff report by Jack Lam
Mr. Lam said that staff had been sending out RFPS to consultants. He suggested
that Council form a consultant's selection committee comprising of two council
members, one planning commissioner, city manager, and community development
director to interview the applicants.
Council concurred in selecting Jon Mikels and Mike Palombo as council representatives
and for the Planning Commission to pick their own representative.
REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO EMPLOY ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES. Staff report by
Lauren Wasserman.
Mr. Wasserman requested authorization to execute agreements for the services of
Gilbert Aja to represent the city during the negotiations with the county on the
site plan of the future law and justice /civic center.
Council expressed concern in authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements
without first seeing them. However, they did agree that they needed someone to
represent the City at this time, and probably Mr. Aja was the best one to have
since he had been working on the project up to this time.
It was agreed that the City Manager should try to find out how many hours this
phase of the program would entail, and to come back to the next meeting with the
agreements for approval.
56--- R£Q F£ ST'- T6- APPRBV£- 3AN- B£ RNARB} N61S- 66b} B- NA6F£- MANA6Ef£NT- NAS�£R -PbAN+
}!em -hed- been- een! #rtned -€ rem-1 he- deneery- }4,- }9g }_6 }!y- 6eene # }_eeee #ng.
R86BSN'f}BN- NB > -8} -6
A- R£ 506NFiBN- BF- fit!£- 6 }�- 6BBN6 }b- BF- }Ti£- 6i� -6F
RANeH9-696AMBN6A,-6A6}FBRN}AT-APPR0V}N6- THE -R£-
V}S6B-5AN-B£ANAHB}NB-6BBN�-6B6}B-WA6F£-NANA6£-
H£Ni- NA69.6R -F6AN.
Item had been removed from the Agenda by staff.
5H. ADDED IIEM: AUTHORIZATION To SEEK BIDS FOR PURCHASE OF CITY VEHICLE. Lauren
Wasserman presented staff report.
He said the staff was requesting authorization to seek bids for an automobile for
the city manager. This was an iten which was included in the next year's budget.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to authorize the staff to seek bids
to purchase the requested vehicle. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
51. ADDED ITEM: CITY PLAQUE. Mayor Schlosser announced that he felt it was
appropriate for the City Council to present the City of Upland a plaque in
commemoration of their 75th Anniversary. Cost of the plaque would be
$25.00.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to authorize the expenditure of
$25 for a plaque for the Mayor to present to the City of Upland. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
7. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn to the
next regularly scheduled city council meeting on June 3, 1981. Motion carried
unaninously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m.
` Respectfully ubm`XJ.�- t.V.aiC�
Beverly AuGhele[
Deputy City Clerk
! AU67 CITY OV RANCHO CUCAMONGA
o WARR 0.40 V E N 0 0 R N A M I
01069 8385
• 01166 75 84
01165 1200
D 116] 3,05
V 0168 •650
r�
I
01191 t9[
DI 198 31199 961
4 ^� 01200 672
01201 65•
Doi$�DO iii
�- 01105 78C
01206 334
°0120018 731
01209 90'
1
01210 831
D1211 33C
012213 831
D 1$15 91'
• 01216 7121
0066764 131
201
06009 009 Vol
06810 Vol
O
D681121 Vol
• 06013 Vol
06B14 O1'
06015 021
006 (,17 0041
• 06918 DOC
06910 120
06821 13C
• 069$j ♦) 133
06621 �01
WARRANT REC ILIAT ION 5/20/01
MAR? A`` DISCOUNT NET
OAT( R NCE
3
130.00
7.03
121.00
is.03
♦95.55
45.00
7.20
137.34
126 64
5.79
618.46
225.44
OnE IS
— __. _ __ __ _____ _____ __ ___ ____ __________ _ _._ - -_
_, _— _— __ —_._
11
1
1
1
i,
R^ 8867 CITY OF RA4G�U CUCAMONGA
MARR A VEN A V E N 0 C 9 N A M E
06526 2041 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL
06R27 2065 CAL HEST
0602E 2093 CANN WHSLE PAPER `CRP
04R29 2335 COCA COLA COTTLINC CO
06830 51382 COMM 9 SIR ENTERPRISES
01832 3500 OY I NGT0NR 6ACROWL SHERf
0,833 2525 CROOK COMPANY
0,834 VOID VENDOR V0. 2575
D6835 2575 CUCAMONGA CO W67ER GIST
0.836 1595 CUCAMO:JGA PRINTING
b 06817 2601 WILLIAM CUTHUERT INC
0'.816 2605 CYPR25$ ROUND COVER
Oe839 2606 CUTH'ERSCN, HUGH
06940 610 WILLIAMS PRINTING, 0
06841 2614 0JC LEASt6G CURB
06842 2650 DAILY REPORT
Ri 06843 2700 DETCU
06044 2005 UICTAPHONE
06 045 1687 DUTY, JACKIE
06846 3175 EASTMAN INC
D6R47 3300 VMPEx HARRY J
O,er.E 4375 GARN6 SS PAINTING
06849 4600 GLN7�AL TELEPHONE CO
01850 4775 GRANT JERRY R
06851 4797 GUYS G -'.LS WORK TOGS
C6952 4c30 HAYES GARY
06853 4962 VIGHLANO TERRACE
C4b54 4864 HILGr NCOPF. PAM
06855 4885 MOGAN. 04RAY K
06856 4900 BOLLLY, WILLIAM L
06857 4901 VOLLEY. WM - PETTY CASH
06858 4915 HOLD DAY ROCK CO INC
06N59 4975 S M iNYT LUMBER CO
06260 4992 HUGGINS 6ACKHOE
06561 4995 NUDES LLOYD
06,162 5005 HU%TM INC
I� 06863 5110 IDH
01,664 5140 INLAND POWER SWEEPING
Ot065 $275 INTL CITY HOT ASSOC
01 -66 5.7E INTL CONF BLDG O6FICIAL
• 0,867 6106 J A C CONSTRUCTION
01,868 6121 JATO COMMUNICATIUNS
06869 6.20 FOY JUNG_NSEN ASSC INC
0.870 6600 •ING ENGINEERS, L 0
• 068T1 661E YRUSE, JJA.V
0/.871 6630 LAM. JACK
06873 6040 LAIRD CGOSTRUCTION CO
ON 74 6655 LANIER BUS PRODUCTS
• OSFTS 6726 LEAGUE OF CAL IF.0 I TIES
r
f
s
WARRANT RECONCILIATION
NAR4 JOURNA`
DAIL REFERENCE
•
5 /20 /E
DISCOUNT NET
I .
19.00
I
500. C0
394.30
279.68
70.090
1722 215.03
I
14.19
783.93
141.72
I ,
960.00
439.9500
IG
145:12
12.72
I
13.20
22.26
1,631.64
15.CC
32.50
150.00
2, BlO.Oa
33.16
I •
125.00
98.56
661.00
581.25
G
150.00
799.64
896.47
250.Do
200.00
I
34.29
1.182.38
55 424.25
Y
104.94
250.00
250..00
400.00
I .
03.94
20.93
200.00
I i
16r026.04
50.00
40.00
116.91
49.33
14.79
70.00
9.00
I i
38.90
75.00
I i
543.20
B62.00
52.50
I i
8.00
122.40
220.48
85.00
I i
4.00
90.63
652.75
191. IZ
Ip.
i
124.780
•
i
I
1
A867 COOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• XARR F VEN F V E N 0 0 R N A M E;
06900 7835 PROL000 CAROL
• 06901 6028 RAM2N1 PAGEANT ASSCC
D6902 8045 RAN 110 DISPOSAL SERVICE
0"903 807S RAPIO 04TA INC
06904 8017
Of905 8119 Ff YRpLLOSMEP 4ULINER _
0 06906 BI50 RETZ CAM4k4 INTER
06907 6160 R11 ZU. x', 0.1
OOVOB 0180 RO DwUNNER PAGING
OL909 8200 P.081NSON, JAMES H
06910 6294 SAN OENNA0.01N0 COUNTY
tl 06913 8631 )8 5N5AN NS5CGOoOA CO I SURVLTORY
d Oe9t4 8361 S AN RO IE G08ROTARYC BROOM
06915 VC 10 VEN00R N0. 8390
It 17 8390 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
06917 8395 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO
D6916 8396 SO A LANDSCAPE MGT
06919 8440 OUTN XE STERN BAG CO
.920 a Ue921 VG80 PORTSMANS N2o TROPHIES
06922 6525 STAT3ONER5 CORP
De923 6532 SULLIVAN, R
06924 8710 TITLE INS 6 TRUST CO
• 01925 8U 35 TRIA1 PNGTO
0.926 B985 TURN. RS INC
C69ZT 9105 VAIRIN. MICHAEL It
00926 9145 VANGUARD COMPANIES
a 0&9333 9250 WESS9T ENO CAST UNITED WAYS
00932 93E7 WE TERN PUBLISHING CO CCU
06934 9163 550 FOL F6 AC OSOVENTURE C SO 1
06!35 9750 YAHNKE CON R 5
06436 9991 XEROX ROMP
01.937 9999 YUKON DISPOSAL SERVICE
06938 V019 FINAL TOTALS
O/ 1
o I��VI
0
m.
•
'A
0
0
i3
WARRANT RECOM LIATICN
XAA9 ,1pURN AI,
GATE PE FE PE NCE
5/20 /81
DISCOUNT NET
12.00
322.00
124.30
973.10
31.06
' 113.11
40.70
20.00 '
150.00
1.436.00
182.41
286.44 r
67.84
1.5640.50
4.299.01
153.64
495.02
6i 3CB.00
- "" 33.71
61.43
254.06
6
500.00
.373.00
96.017
1.239.26
00.00
9.54
260.00
1.579.26
60.00
FINAL TOTALS 338.147.79 -
81
3
11
2
3
41
5
6
7
8
9'
10
11
12''
13
14i
15
• 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23I
24
25
26
27
0 26
Gerry Johns, In Pro Per
c/o 630 East Rialto
San Bernardino, California
(714) 783 -1265
Claimant, Johns
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ADMINISTRATION
MAY t:7 1981
AM 718AIM112111213141516
I!
CLAII7 FOR PERS014AL INJURIES
GERRY JOHNS,
1
Claimant,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, OFFICER TON
SEELIG, and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
Defendants. ) Government Code, SS 905;
1 910; 910.2, et seq.
TO THE SFCRCTARY OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, THE CLERK OF THE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND OFFICER TON SEELIG:
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Gerry Johns, whose
address is 630 East Rialto San Bernardino, California claims
damages from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Sheriff of the
County of San Bernardino, and Officer Tom Seelig in an amount
computed as of the date of Presentation of this Claim, of One
million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).
1� This Claim is based on personal injuries sustained by
21 claimant on or about February 21, 1981, on Archibald Avenue,
3i Rancho Cucamonga, California, at approximately 1:05 a.m., and .
4i as further described in the San Bernardino County Sheriff
51J; Department's Police Report A1084266 -11, to wit, a bullet wound
6I to the back. This Claim is also based on the subsequent arrest,
7 detention, transportation and prosecution of claimant, Gerry
8 Johns. The personal injuries were sustained as a result of the
9 following circumstances.
10 That at approximately 1:05 a.m. on February 21, 1981,
11 officer Seelig, in using excessive force and without adequate
12 provocation or without a claim of self- defense, negligently or
13 intentionally injured Gerry Johns by ramming claimant's car and
14 shooting him in the back as he ran from the scene of a car
15 accident. That as a result of said injuries, Gerry Johns
16 I suffered injuries to his back., as well as sustaining other .
17 injuries.
18 That Officer Seelig, at all times herein mentioned,
19 intentionally used excessive force in effectuating the arrest
20 of the claimant, Gerry Johns.
21. The aforementioned governmental entities are addi-
22 tionally negligent in that said governmental entities negli-
23 gently hired, supervised, authorized and ratified the
24 I activities of the defendants, and each of them, relative to the
25 11 initial detention, arrest and assault and battery and /or negli-
26 i gence in the striking of Gerry Johns, and later criminal prose -
27 cution of claimant Gerry Johns.
26
2
The at all tines herein mentioned, the aforementioned
1
I
individual defendants were acting within the scope of employment
21
3
I relative to their activities in assaulting and battering claim -
i4
ant. The aforementioned individual defendants were not acting
within the scope of employment relative to their malicious
I
5
6
prosecution of claimant, Gerry Johns, for activities engaged in
7
or allegedly engaged in.
8
The names of the other police officers and employees
9
acting on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Sheriff
10
of San Bernardino County are presently unknown to claimant and
11
have therefore been sued herein as defendants Does 1 through
12
100.
13
That at all times herein mentioned, the defendants,
14
and each of them, violated various mandatory duties relative to
15
their activities surrounding the assault and arrest of claimant
•
I Gerry Johns.
-
16
17
I The amount claimed by the claimant Gerry Johns as of
18
the date of the presentation of this Claim is computed as
19
follows:
20
Dana_q. Incurred
21
Medical and hospital expenses $ 250,000.00 (approx.)
22
Loss of earnings, earning $ 750,000 _DO (approx.)
capacity, special damages and
23
general damages
24
Total Damages Incurred $1,000,000.00 (approx.)I
25
All notices or other communications with regard to
26 j
this Claim should be sent to the claimant at 630 East Rialto,
27
San Bernardino, California.
`
2E
DATED: April 24, 1991. BY: li.
lCeCry
n
In (pro er
3
ifi
J
•
9
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Intention to Vacate Cleveland Avenue
The attached letter and map were submitted by the Caldwell Company
requesting the vacation of Cleveland Avenue between 7th and 8th
Streets. Because of the uncertain status of adjacent development
and the potential future need for Cleveland to be continuous to
north of the railroad, Staff will not recommend vacation of these
rights -of -way at the present time.
The attached resolution of intent will set the public hearing to
vacate the subject street on June 17, 1981 and will allow the
developer and property owners to present evidence for the vacation.
Respectfully .submitted,
LBH BBK:jaa
Attachments
7
RESOLUTION NO.
• "y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VAGArE CLEVELAND AVENUE r �r
BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH STREETS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION l: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed
under Section 8300, et seq, of the Streets and Highways Code, also known
as the Street Vacation Act of 1941.
:W&M9, T�iaA the City Council hereby declares its
intent! se ,, " tmmtaJie�` poori'on�-bf Cleveland Avenue a City street, as
shown on Map No. V -012 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal
description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by
reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday,
the 17th day of June, 1981, at 7:00 p.m., in the Lion's Park Community
Service Building, located at 9161 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed
vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City street is
necessary for present or prospective street purposes.
• SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause
notices to be posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part
thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not
more than 309 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted,
each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall
have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height:
"NOTICE OF HEARING, TO VACATE STREET ".
SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the
reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities or record.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the
City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same
to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least
once in The Daily _Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May , 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
i
9
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CLEVELAND AVENUE ABANDONMENT
That portion of the unnamed street as shown on the map of Cucamonga Lands,
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
as per plat recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Claps in the office of the County
Recorder of said County being more particularly described as the Easterly 30.00
feet of Parcel Map 6194, filed in Book 62, Pages 62 through 66 of Parcel Claps
in the office of said County Recorder lying Northerly of the Northerly line of
7th Street as shown on said Parcel Map No. 6194 and Southerly of the Southerly
line of 8th Street as shown on said Parcel Map No. 6194.
Subject to covenants, conditions, reservations, restrictions, rights of way and
easements, if any, of record.
•
a
�
a
pcj3� o °
`C-0 l3ra1Ti i Or ?'DEi'T.
!vA Pei
April 21, 1981 ¢
Mr. Rathin (Shintu) Bose �
Associate Civil Engineer'
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Reference: Cleveland Avenue Abandonment
Dear Mr. Bose:
• In response to your letter of March 30, 1981, please con-
sider this our formal request for vacation of that portion
of Cleveland Avenue between 7th and 8th Streets which is
shown on our Parcel Map No. 6192. The reason for this re-
quest is to clear up some long conflicting maps which are
in existence as it relates to the Cleveland Avenue right -
of -way. Additionally, the about to be adopted Industrial
Specific Plan for the'City eliminates Cleveland Avenue
as it will go nowhere once 8th Street is also abandoned.
The name of the adjacent property owner to the east is
Leonard Rosenthal Trustee, care of Jack Sylvester,
4002 Calle Sonara, Apartment 2A, Laguna Hills 92653.
To help you facilitate processing this request, enclosed
you will find 10 copies of a scaled map together with a
legal description of the area to be abandoned.
•
We have also enclosed the $115.00 fee you requested
1151 DOVE STREET I SUITE 275 1 NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92660 1 (714) 8330300
.i e
Mr. Rathin (Shintu) Hose •
Citv of Rancho Cucamonga
April 21, 1981
Page 2
Your prompt attention to this matter will be appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
RANCHO HAVEN ASSOCIATES
Charles B. Caldwell
CHC:wk
Enclosures
cc: Vito Devito Francesco, Esq.
Mr. Charlie Mitchell, Cadillac Fairview
Mr. Gerald Oldenburg, Williamson S Schmid
Mr. Robert Stelzl, Cadillac Fairview
•
•
- -------- ------ -------
----- --
---------
/.4
OA &C,z
'O"C4Z N 7011
7.d47S
----------------
[mil
44
q
iw �Fj
:14 Pe tttt Al
N P59
�i
6 % �
% \ \
ƒ k K
� t
® i\
t «
, � \
%
SL<E-F % \JyAC: CCMFD W-4Y
- !
|3 &�®
�
E
y
,ale
^�� /
CITY OF RANO-10 CUCANIONG.\
STAFF REPORT
0
DATE: May 20; 1981 ""
1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd H. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: City Engineer's Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1
As the Council is aware, the City is required to hold an advertised
public hearing each year to set assessments for the following year
on the 'Landscape Maintenance District. The attached engineer's
report and resolution itemized the actual cost costs for 1980 -81
and the proposed assessments for 1981 -82. Costs in 1980 -81 were
$0.25 per square foot which were $0.15 below estimated. The differ-
ential has been credited to property owners on this year's assess-
ment. The current year assessment to cover inflationary costs in
maintenance, water and electricity is based on $0.35 per square
foot which equates to $74.30 per parcel.
L
It is recommended that the Council approve the attached resolutions
making preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report and setting
a Public Hearing for June 3, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH: j as
Attachments
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Land-
scaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The report deals with the a..*ual costs for Fiscal Year 1980 -81 and the
estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1981-82 of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Areas to be
included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and
on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said parkways being 187,449
•square feet. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District
are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and
usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any parkway improve-
ment. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit
to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot
basis.
SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATION
The plans and specifications for landscaping have been prepared by the
developers for the individual subdivision parkways. The plans and parkways are
as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each subdivision and as approved by
the City Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and
the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape areas. The plans
and specifications for landscape improvement an the individual tracts are hereby
made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications
19 were attached hereto.
15
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 1
Page 2
•
Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas
include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part
of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and
beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation,
trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or
injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other
solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary
of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from
walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All
improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data adjusted
for inflation, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will
equal thirty five cents ($.35) per square foot for the fiscal year 1981 -82. These
costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. •
1980 -81 Estimated Assessment Cost
$.40 X 167,522 sq. ft. - $67,008.80
Per lot Annual Assessment - $67,008.80 - 704 = $95.18
Per lot Monthly Assessment - $95.18 r 12 = $7.93
1980 -81 Actual Costs
$.25 X 167,522 = $41,880.50
Actual per lot annual cost (695 lots) = $60.26
1980 -81 Actual Assessment - $95.18 X 695 - $66,150.10
Actual Assessment ($66,150.10) less Actual Cost ($41,880.50) = Surplus $24,269.60
Surplus ($24,269.60 _ 695 lots) = $34.92 overpayment
-82 Estimated Assessment
$.35 X 187,449 sq. ft. (original plus 2 annexations) = $65,607.15
65,607.15 _ (695 + 188 lots) _ $74.30
$65,607.15 less (695 X 34.92) _ $24,269.40 •
(695 lots X $39.38 (74.30 - 34.92 surplus) + 188 lots X $74.30 - $41,337.50
Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached
assessment Diagram.
•
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 1
Page 3
SECTION 5, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this
report and labeled "Exhibit A". Detailed diagrams of each tract are included.
These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
Improvements for the entire district are found to be of general benefit
to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel.
It is proposed that all future development shall be anne:;ed to the
District.
SECTION 7. ORDER OF EVENTS
I. City Council approves institution of District proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval o`
• City Engineer's report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District
and sets a public hearing date.
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony
and determines to form a District or abandon proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with City
Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing
and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
•
17
RESOLUTION NO.
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAIN-
TENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82;
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972;
AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to
the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division
15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve
as follows:
Description of Work
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and
it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments
within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for the fiscal year 1981 -82, for
the maintenance and operation of those parkways and facilities thereon
dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision
tract map within the boundaries of said District. Said maintenance and
operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees,
grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, walls, in
connection with said parkways.
• Location of Work
SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within
roadway right of way and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of
the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file
in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1."
Description of Assessment District
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said
City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the
said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable
upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and
expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included
within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1," indicating by said boundary line the extent
of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which
map is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City.
Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more
particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so
• on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment
district.
(- I
Pane 2
Report of Engineer
SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No.
has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the•
amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones,
and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report,
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City
Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all partic-
ulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent
of the work.
Time and Place of Hearing
SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 3rd day of June,
1981, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said
work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not
be levied and collected for fiscal year 1981 -82. Protests must be in
writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer
thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be
delivered to the City Clerk of said City pridr to the time set for the
Hearing, and no other protests or objection; will be considered. If the
signer of any protest is not shown upor. the last equalized assessment roll
of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the
protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written
evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described.
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 •
SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried
through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California
designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
Publication of Resolution of Intention
SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961
of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once
in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981.
AYES:
HOES:
ABSENT:
1�
is
RESOLUTION NO. 'G )- 7D
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUtlCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAIN-
TENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1.
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
that:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the
City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City
an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and
collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Landscape Maintenance
District Number 1.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk
of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said
Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration;
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each
and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report
is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or
should be modified in any respect;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows:
• 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses
of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained
in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and
confirmed.
2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and
described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within
said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in
said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be
received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the
incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily
approved and confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual
Report for the fiscal year 1931 -82 for the purposes of all subsequent
proceedings.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1991.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
dv
CITY OF RANCHO CL,'GVM X%4 A
STAFF REPORT
1977
DATE: May 20, 1981
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Steve McCutchan, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PREPARE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1
ANALYSIS: As part of the public review of the Industrial Assessment
District 79 -1, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be prepared.
The EIR will assess any potential significant environmental impacts
that may occur if the Assessment District were to be established and
the improvements constructed. A copy of the Initial Study, which
identified some potential adverse impacts, is attached.
A request for proposals to prepare an EIR was transmitted to approx-
imately five consulting firms from which proposals were submitted.
After reviewing the proposals, it was decided that Genge Consultants
of Southern California could best prepare the EIR within the range of
their proposal. A contract was prepared, submitted to, and reviewed
by the City Attorney, which is also attached.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve for execution the attached contract for pro-
fessional services between the City and Genge Consultants of Southern
California.
Respectfully submitted,
BARRY K. HOGAN
City Planner
8 KH: SI4: j r
Attachments
C11
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• INITIAL STUDY
•
Is
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P.O. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730, (714) 989 -1851
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: PAUL. ROUGEAD. SAME AS ABOVE
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
SULW CFNjR}I RQUIDN OF CITY BORDERED BY 4th HAVEN 1 -15, AND ,
FOOTHILL
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION •
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To establish an Asse5sment District to
elect feas to construct an area dorm drain and street Syctem
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Numerous existing industrial
structures_
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMNTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTLRAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Area previously used as vineyard - -much has been connected to industrial- -
rest now vacant an wit vineyar s not neing utiiizea. Numerous
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series'
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
Aasassmont nistrict is part of tha overall construction of a stnrm
drain and street system network.
•
z2�
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
• X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
_ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan. designations?
X 5= Remove any existing trees? How many? Unknown
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, £lammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: The assessment
d• r r ld d <rr;et Ae„etnnmen r_„bj,cj��+ tja]jy_
• do all of the above as nntad Xpc
IMPORTMrr: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evallation can be made by the Development
Review Committee. n
Date S /�3 /fr� signature`"
• /
Title ASSOCIATE PLANNER
I -9
L� _
RESIDE?1TIAL CONSTRUCTION .
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho cucaaonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development
kame of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:
Specific Location of Project:
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TO AL
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin, construction:
4. Earliest date of
occco an c::
Model
and ` of Tentative
S. Bedrooms Price Rance
M
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
APPLICANT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FILI`iG DATE: LOG NUMBER:
PROJECT: INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1
PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH CENTRAL PORTION OF CITY
1. EWIRONIMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers ape required on attached
sheets).
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and Geology• Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
•
geologic relationships?
�— —
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
x
A-
burial of the soil ?
--
c. Change in topography or ground surface
x
contour intervals?
-- —
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features?
E
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
X
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
E! _
g, Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
X
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
,_
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
use of any mineral resource?
=
2. Hvdrnlo P,v, Will the proposal. have significant
results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runoff?
C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
• body of water?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality?
f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
h. The reduction in the amount of water other-
wise available for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches?
3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
C. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
d. Mora
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
YES MAYBF No
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
x _
x
X
x —
X
x _
.L
i
YES KNYB£ NO
X _
X -
X-.. _
— . X
X _
X
X - _
X — _
X
X 4 _
— — IL
X
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
plants into an area?
il. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
—
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
5. peculation. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
•
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
6• Socio- Fconomic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. land Cne and planain^, Conaidcrations. Will the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
r!
YES KNYB£ NO
X _
X -
X-.. _
— . X
X _
X
X - _
X — _
X
X 4 _
— — IL
X
YES MAYBE NO
8. Transportation.
Will the proposal have significant
tesulLs
in:
a.
Generation of substantial additional vehicular
•
movement?
X _
b.
Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction?
X
c.
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
X _
d.
Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
X _
e.
Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and /or goods?
X
f.
Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
s
X _
g.
Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
X _
9. Cultural
Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a.
A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
X
•
10. Health,
Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a.
Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
X _
b,
Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
X
c.
A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
X _
d.
An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
X
e.
Increase in existing noise levels?
X _
f.
Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
X
g.
The creation of objectionable odors?
X _
h.
An increase in light or glare?
X _ •
Yes MAYBE NO
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
•
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
C. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
X-
12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the Proposal
have a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
i
b. Natural or packaged gas?
X
C. Communications systems? r
y
d. Water supply?
X
e. Wastewater facilities?
X
f. Flood control structures?
X
•
g. Solid waste facilities?
X__
h. Fire protection?
i. Police protection?
J. Schools?
_
X
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
_ X
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
III. Other governmental services?
11. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
_ X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
C. An increase in the demand for development of
new sources of energy?
X
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
_ X
YES MAYBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
• scarce natural resource? _ (X
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the future). X
C. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects, — •
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _X
II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
The project will tend to at first create significant environmental changes and
impacts due to construction and related initial surge in development. However,
the long term effects of the project are beneficial and will mitigate existing
hazards or the intensification of these hazards of land development.
•
... 31
III. DE TERN INATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
• ❑ [ find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
_ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
t� in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
EDI find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
envirnment, and an ENVIROS:IENT IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Ste/
•
•
Signature
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Title
7�
AGREEM.BNT •
This agreement for professional services, dated and effective
is a contract between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation Of the State of California,
hereinafter referred to as "City ", and, Genge Consultants of Southern
California, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ".
RECITALS
A. The City desires to retain technical and professional services
for the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report for
the public review period'of the proposed Industrial Assessment
District 79 -1.
B. The City has approved the selection of the Consultant to assume
responsibility for performance of work described herein in accord
with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
THEREFORE CITY AND CONSULTANT AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
The Consultant shall prepare, perform, and complete the following
professional services through completion of a Final Environmental
Impact Report for the public review of Industrial Assessment
District 79 -1.
A. SCOPE OF WORK
1. Preparation of Focused Screencheck Draft EIR: The Con-
sultant wi consolidate a ate unto a single Focused
Screencheck Draft SIR containing information, analysis, and
graphics into a format acceptable to the City. Any separate
reports prepared specifically for the completion of the
project shall be attached a$ part of an Appendix to the
Focused Screencheck Draft EIR. The document shall be in
full compliance with all of the provisions of Article 9 of•
the State EIR Guidelines. The steps involved in the prep-
aration of the Focused Screencheck Draft EIR shall include:
o Consolidation of environmental setting description;
p Determine environmental impacts and identify measures
to reduce or eliminate significant impacts;
o Prepare topical sections of the EIR (i.e., alternatives
to the project, irreversible /irretrievable commitment
of resources) and summary section;
o Prepare the focused Screencheck EIR and submittal of
six (6) copies of the document for City review.
Timc Frame: 4 weeks
Preparation of Focused Draft ETR: Upon completion of the
crtyssreview of the consultant s Focused Screencheck Draft
EIR the Consultant shall address and incorporate these
comments into a focused Draft EIR Suitable for distribution
and public review. The City shall have the right to review
the Focused Draft EIR, if necessary, prior to actual
completion of the document. Upon approval by the City, the
Consultant shall submit a camera ready copy of the Focused
Draft SIR to the City. The City takes the responsibility
upon list), to print and distribute copies to the appropriate
persons and agencies.
Time Frame: i weeks
•
�j
3. Res onses to Comments and Pre station of Focused Final EIR:
. The City upon receipt of any public or agency corments ma e
on the Focused Draft EIR shall transmit copies to the Consultant
The Consultant shall have the responsibility to prepare
responses to comments received. The City has the right to
review responses made by Consultant and make amendments
where deemed necessary. The comments and responses shall be
combined in a manner consistent with the provisions of the
State EIR. Guidelines into a Focused Final FIR which shall be
transmitted to the City as an Addendum.
Time Frame: 1 week
4. Public Hearin s: The Consultant will be available for three
131 pub rc hearings on the Focused Draft and Final EIR. The
City has the right to determine which meetings the Consultant
should attend. If additional meetings are. necessary, the
City shall pay the Consultant their standard hourly rate.
B. SUBCONTRACTORS
Any subcontractors that the Consultant shall retain shall be the
sole responsibility of the Consultant and shall be compensated
entirely by the Consultant. The City bears no responsibility
whatsoever to compensate any subcontractors.
C. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY
1. The City acknowledges its responsibility to provide the
Consultant requested information that it has readily available
in a timely manner so as not to impede the Consultant's
progress toward successful completion.
'34
2. The City will arrange dates, times, and places of all public
hearings, including adequate notice to the public of such
hearings.
•
D. TIME SCHEDULE
Product Completion
Focused Screencheck Draft EIR 4 weeks
Focused Draft EIR 2 weeks
Responses to Comments and
Focused Final EIR 1 week
Public Hearings variable
E. COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT
The Consultant shall be compensated for the services provided
under this Agreement. The total compensation payable to the
Consultant shall be $9,000,00. The City shall make payments to
the Consultant according to the following schedule:
- 301 of total compensation, or $2,700.00, within 10 days the
execution of this Agreement;
- 301 of total compensation, or $2,700.00, within 30 days of
receipt by the City of the Focused Draft EIR:
- 301 of the total compensation, or $2,700.00, within 30 days
of receipt by the City of an acceptable Focused Final EIR;
- 102 of the total compensation, or $900,00, shall be retained
to ensuro completion of this Aq reement. Within 10 days of
certification of the Focused Final EIR by the City Council
Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or within lu days of tho
completion of the public hearings on the Industrial Assessment
District 79 -1 if the project is not approved and /or the
Focused Final EIR not certified, this final payment to the
Consultant shall be made.
'34
=E UNATION •
The City may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice
thereof to the Consultant, provid,l that the City shall be
obligated to pay Consultant for alr .uork performed. The amount
of this payment shall not exceed the increment of the total fee
to which the Consultant is entitled according to the above
schedule for tasks completed, plus a percentage of the next
increment, which would be payable for the next task, equivalent
to the percentage of work completed by the Consultant on the next
task, prior to receipt of the Notice of Termination by the
Consultant.
G. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
The Consultant is an Eq-:al Opportunity and Affirmative Action
employer and agrees to comply with applicable requirements
governing equal employment cppertunity.
H. INSPECTION
The City, in reference to any request for payment submitted by
the Consultant for services under this Agreement, shall have the
right to examine and audit the records of the Consultant to
verify such payment.
I. AUTHORITY
Each of the parties to this Agreement represents the person
signing on behalf of such party has authority to do so.
J. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES
It is understood that the contractual relationship of the
Consultant to the City is that of an independent contractor, a
all persons working for or under the Consultant are their ayer�
servants, and employees, not agents, servants, or employees of
the City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Consultant have executed
this Agreement as of the date set forth herein.
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAAONGA
City Manager
ATTEST:
City P annex
FR CIpAL, Ge nge Consultants
Of Southern California
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FOM AND CONTENT
G ty Attorney
•
—3�
•
9
. ern
SUBJECT: Pipe Line License
The attached resolution is for the acceptance of the maintenance
of a pipe and related appurtenances for storm drainage that is
required to be installed in railroad right -of -way by Rancho Haven
Associates, developer.
The developer h:;s paid all necessary fees required by the railroad
to accomplish the processing of the license.
The drainage pipe is to be installed as part of the development at
the southeast corner of Haven and 8th . The pipe provides for
undergrounding of storm flows from north of the tracks through the
site.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution author-
izing the Mayor to sign the license on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted ,
LBII�:: JJL:1: j as
Attachments
_3�
V
STA T REPORT
C I
DATE:
May 20, 1981
1977
TO:
City Council and
City Manager
FROM:
Lloyd B. Hubbs,
City Engineer
BY:
John L. Martin;
Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Pipe Line License
The attached resolution is for the acceptance of the maintenance
of a pipe and related appurtenances for storm drainage that is
required to be installed in railroad right -of -way by Rancho Haven
Associates, developer.
The developer h:;s paid all necessary fees required by the railroad
to accomplish the processing of the license.
The drainage pipe is to be installed as part of the development at
the southeast corner of Haven and 8th . The pipe provides for
undergrounding of storm flows from north of the tracks through the
site.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution author-
izing the Mayor to sign the license on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted ,
LBII�:: JJL:1: j as
Attachments
_3�
RESOLUTION NO. S)— 7l
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPE
LINE LICENSE AT UTICA STREET CROSSING UNDER THE
SANTA FE RAILROAD
WHEREAS, the City Council approved for filing a Parcel Map No.
6194 which was conditioned such to install drainage facilities to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and,
WHEREAS, the developer of said Parcel Map, Rancho Haven Associates
signed an agreement and bond for such installation; and,
WHEREAS, said installation requires a pipe line and appurtenances
to be installed within Santa Fe Railway rights -of -way from Licenses for installation
and maintenance from said railway company; and,
WHEREAS, said installation by developer is subject to acceptance by
the City for maintenance; and,
WHEREAS, the Santa Fe Railway Company has provided the City with
a pipe line license to be used as an agreement by the City to insure maintenance
of said pipe line within said company's rights -of -way.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that maintenance of said pipe line will be accepted
• upon completion to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Mayor is
authorized to sign said pipe line license on behalf of the City between the
City and the Santa Fe Railway Company.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren N. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
L
J�
EYHISIT "A"
ATTACHED TO CONTRACT BETWEEN ..
THE ATCH!SON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CCWANY
AND
RANCHO HAVEN ASSOCIATES
LOS ANGELES, CALIF W !U. l�ylv�r2
)=�BRU -`^FLY ZCo� l9�{l A.4M.-EN,, AP1G
a�scuiar�a+ APaav�r�
SCALE: t IN.70 40 FT. ,
Ba_
% SLW BBF2IJARDrr.10
yo, � 4 4 l ROCr- 10STEF2 NEXT
FGwcC-
� \` Dg4iN —�
i�E5GF21P7 -IO1J
SI- I&NHS N�DBD, RY
I� ^r%tT"� L._.a.i�r�+''j.(���.i•�J� �:+�� ✓�.�C.`"'7'e�r�1/"Y�•r i7�iZ�J
C',� J, 0=471 s�i9r�+ G E.C.L: DRAWING NO. 601-40075
—M- to LO:>
A/`ICr L�•L�S
qI
CUC.An4n>`1G x'T
jA ANC
. A,
FGwcC-
� \` Dg4iN —�
i�E5GF21P7 -IO1J
SI- I&NHS N�DBD, RY
I� ^r%tT"� L._.a.i�r�+''j.(���.i•�J� �:+�� ✓�.�C.`"'7'e�r�1/"Y�•r i7�iZ�J
C',� J, 0=471 s�i9r�+ G E.C.L: DRAWING NO. 601-40075
BN -70123
f.. IM Smndv,d
tAVV /mrd bf k .mi S.W.,
PIPE. LINE LICENSE
THIS LICENSE, :Made this_. 10th__ -_day ot__..._ March ,..,__...._....____..__., 19 61.,
between. ..___ ...._...._.._... THE..$ISHISQi(.._TOPEKl1 AND_SANTA _F RAL4WAY..CD.M28NY_. —.,
aware_ ___,,,,_„ corporation (hereinafter called "Licensor"), party of the first part, and
...... CITY --- OF... RAi1CNO., CUCAM0IJGA ,.- &-mnic.ipalityria_ the.. State of-- California -
- b —eth -------- --- ---- -- -- -- --- ---
(hereinafter, whether one or more, called "licensee•'), party of the second park
WITNESSETH, That the parties hereto for the considerations hereinafter expressed covenant and
agree as follows:
1. Subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Licensor licenses Licensee to construct.
-and maintain___'-._" one--- --------- -------
---- __'____ °_______ -___
( 1 ) pipe line--- _ — _._Sixty - throe_ _ -.—.__....,._.._....—_.—_ .............._...___._._.-
..__..(63)___._.inches in diameter (hereinafter, whether one or more pipe lines, called the "PIPE
LINE "), across or along the right of way of Licensor at or near the station
San. Bernardi .no - County,.. Cal..ifornia_the exact location of the PIPE LINE being more particularly
shown by red coloring upon the print hereto attached, No.___fi01- 400Z6.____, date& ----- ..... -------
... .... _—..__. FehrLaCy2fi,..1981.__— ._...___ marked "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof.
2. Licensee shall use the PIPE LIME solely for carrying _._._storrd.cun _ pff..water .....
_ —__
•
...
and shall not use it to carry any other commodity or for any other purpose whatsoever.
3. Licensee shall pay Licensor as compeneatiou for this license the sum of_ ___. .- _...... •
One_Hundred_Fifty -_and NoL100 Dollars 150.00Z_ =one time fee_- _ -__..
•f. Licenses shall, at its own cost and subject to the supervision and control of Licensor's chief
emineer, locate. - construct and maintain the PIPE LINE in such a manner and of such materiel that
it ,vill not at any time be a soures of danger to or interference with the present or future tracks,
roadbed and property of Licensor, or the safe operation of its railroad. In cases where the Licensee
is permitted under paragraph 2 hereof to use the PIPE LINE for oil. gas, petroleum products, or
other fl.ammaUl_or highly volatile substances and •r pressure, the PIPE LINE shall be constructed,
in.sudied and thereafter maintained in conformity with the plans and specifications shown on print
hereto attnehed in such cases, marked Exhibit Band made a part hereof. If at any time Licensee
shall, in the judgment of Licensor, fail to perform properly its obligations under this paragraph, Li-
censor may, at its option, itself perform such work as it deems necessary for the safe operation of
its railroad, mul in such event Licensee agrees to pay, within fifteen (15) days after bill shall have
born rendered therefor, the cost so incurred by Licensor, but faflorn on the part of Licensor to per-
form the obli :;alim•s of Licensee shall not re!nace Licensee from liability hereunder for loss or damage
occasiuned therdby.
5. Licon ne shall reimburse Licensor for any expense incurred by Licensor for false work to
support Lievnaor's tracics and for fLi;minn to protect its traffic dining installation of the PIPE LINE
and for any and all other expense incurred by Licensor on account of the PIPE LINE.
G. Licensee shall at all times indemnify and save harmless Licensor against and pay in full alt
loss, lama-s or expense that Livecsor MY sustain, incur or become liable for, resulting in any man•
nor from the conAruction, maintenance, use, state or repair, or nrescnce of the PIPE LINE, including
any such lose, damage or expense arising out of (a) loss of o• damage to property, (b) injury to or
death of persons, (c) mechanics' or other liens of any character, or (d) taxes or assessments of any kind. •
S. If at any time Licensee shall fail or refuse to comply with or carry out any of the covenants
herein contained Licensor may at its election forthwith revoke this license.
8. THIS LICENSE is given by Licensor and accepted by Licensee upon the express condition that
•the same may be terminated at any time by either party upon ten (10) days' notice in writing to be
served upon the other party, stating therein the date that such termination shall take place, and that
upon the termination of this license in this or any other manner herein provided, Licensee, upon de-
mand of Licensor, shall abandon the use of the PIPE LINE and remove the same and restore the right
of way and tracks of Licensor to the same condition in which they were prior to the placing of the
PIPE LINE thereunder. In case Licensee shall fail to restore Licensor's premises As aforesaid within
ten (10) days after the effective date of termination, Licensor may proceed with such work at the
expense of Licensee. No termination hereof shall release Licensee from any liability or obligation here-
under, whether of indemnity- or otherwise, resulting from any acts, mnissions or events happening
prior to the dale the PIPE LINE is removed and the right of way and track of Licensor restored
as above provided.
9. In the case of the eviction of Licensee by anyone owning or obtaining title to the premises on
which the PIPE. LINE is located, or the sale or abandonment by Licensor of said premises, Licensor
shall not be liable to Licensee for any damage of any nature whatsoever or to refund any payment
made by Licensee to Licensor hereunder, except the proportionate part of any recurring rental charge
which may have been paid hereunder in advance.
10. Any notice hereunder to be given by Licensor to Licensee shall be deemed to be properly served
if it be deposited in the United States Afail, postage prepaid, addressed to Licensee at_ ... ........
_._ -.
-, 9320 .Bo sel_i.ne.,._$u i te. "0' >...3. _ D.._ HOx_7 93.. Bancho._ Cttcaawnga LA__91330....- .___.e_ -_.
Any notice to be given hereunder by Licensee to Licensor shall be deemed to be properly served if the
same be deposited in the United States Alai], postage prepaid, addressed to Licensor's.. -----
_—.-
..- ......... .__Gen era l. Mana9ec.— .-- - -._at 5200..-E...Sheila_Street--.---.--
_______ -__. Los A_nge� ;.,_�jlifoCni,i_SDD4D__ —�
11. In the event that two or more parties execute this instrument As Licensee, all the covenants
and agreements of Licensee in this license shall be the joint and several covenants and agreements of
such parties.
•12. All the covenants and provisions of this instrument shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the successors, legal representatives And assigns of the parties to the same extent and effect
as the same are binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, but no assignment hereof
by Licensee, its successors, legal representatives or assigns, or any Aubsequent assignee, shall be bind-
ing upon Licensor without the written consent of Licensor in each instance.
Attached hereto and made a part hereof is Rider "A" identified by the
signature of J. H. Schwartz.
IN WITNESS WHEREOP, The parties have executed this agreement in duplicate the day and
year first above v:rittcn.
-_.THE _1lTCI!I50 "1, TOPEKA�yp SANTg, Fi.RAI1.JdAY�DMP.Al1Y.__— ..___. (Licensor)
Approved as to Description:
Chief Engineer.
Its .......... _ .........
.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO%A
By_.
Its
Mayor
(Licensee)
RIDER W N B9
RIDER to license agreement dated March 10, 1981 `
between THE ATCHISON, TOPCEA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ll. In cases where Licensee is permitted under Section 2 hereof to use the
pIpELISE for non- Elarrtmable substances, the PIPELINE shall be eonstructsd,—instal led and
thereafter maintained in conformity with plans and specifications set forth in the American
R"Iway Engineering Association, Specification for Pipeline Crossings Under Railway Track
for Non - Flammable Substances, Revised 1964, or Specification for the Placement of Concrete
Culvert Pipe, Revised 1966, whichever may apply.
14. Any work performed on Licenser's right of way by Licensee or Licensee's
contractor shall be done in a satisfactory workmanlike manner and in accordance with plans
and specifications approved by Licensor, including plans covering any falsework, bracing
or cribbing that may be necessary to use over, under or adjacent to Licensoe's track, and
no work shall be permitted until said plans and specifications have been approved by
Licensor.
15. Licensee or Licensee's contractor shall not be permitted to commence work
on said L c ensor's right of way without having first received written notification from
Licensor's Division Superintendent of permission to proceed.
( 16. Any contractor or subcontractor performing work on or in connection with
the PIPELINE shall for the purpose of this agreement, and particularly for the purposes of
Section 6 of this agreement, be conclusively deemed to be the servant and agent of Licensee
acting on behalf and within the scope of such contractor's or subcontractor's employment
for Licensee.
17. Licensee agrees to furnish and keep in force or arrange to have furnished
and keep in force insurance of all kinds and amounts specified below during the initial
term of construction of the PIP F.L INE and during any subsequent term or terms during which
maLnten'ince is performed on the PIPELINE.
(a) Licensee shall, with respect to the operations which it performs upon, •
ninth or ad)ncoat to 6icensor's right of way and /or track, furnish or arrange to have
furs nhml (i) renulnr Contractors' Public Liability Insurance with limits of not less than
Five lund.-A Thousand Dollars ($500,000) far ali liability arising out of bodily injuries
to or death of one person and, subject to that limit for each person, One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) for all liability arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more
persons in one accident or occurrence; and (ii) regular Contractors' Property Damage
Liabillti Insurance with limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for each
occurrence for all liability arising out of damage to or loss or destruction of property.
Licensee and all its contractors and subcontractors shall be named insureds either in a
single policy of insurance complying with the requirements of this subsection (a) or in
sep,aatn . policies maintained during such periods as such contractors and /or subcontractors
shall perform any work hereunder. The policy or policies insuring Licensee shall insure
Licensee's contractual liability in favor of Licensor contained in Section 6 of the
printed provisions of this license.
19. Licensee agrees to furnish or arrange to have furnished to Licensor cer-
tificates reflecting the insurance coverage or certified copy of insurance policy, if
,lcd by Licensor, es required by subsection (a) of Section 17 hereof. Certificates
re.flectir.c the c verago required by subsection (a) shall unqualifiedly require 30 days'
wrtaton notiro to Licensor of cancellation or modification of the insurance referred to in
such Ce [Y Lf ICd CCS.
19. l.icrnsoe shall not ho permitted to exercise the license and permission
:rant,d hn n•n,d,•r until notified by Licensor that insurance furnished pursuant to Section 17
hrrcnf .r. ti.tLi :fdeta ['y'.
•
/- ! rhncied by L/. ._&�,
---- -- EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHED TO CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA_.
LOS ANGELES, CALIF. W W. %LIVER
)=E-5R UAFvr 26, /e9/ A.GU.- CrraKCRN6
n�soxPra� ApPRa�a
SCALES t IN. TO �I.O FT.
R /LV
To S.nN BBFtNARD�nfO - —
O, S C ROCNE5TC—R, NEXT
N
�
I(�a
50
To Los ANC.Ea-Lim!
CUGQMON4A IJG—XTj
5��nlD D /s-r: III
TR/ cT of 11392
MT
RIF RAP
. 6• G.L. F�
DHSCf2IPT'toN:
= E.S. 912 -025 -
M.P. 9� � z81x.o8
i•S
A 5TbRI j DRAIN P/PE AND
,=iJLET .3TTtucTiJRE ON 741c,HT
OA WAY zL4o )N SNf4pLD.
f
NLAR CucAMoNGA,, S.A>,/ BMRNARDINO
COUNTY CALIXORN /A C.E.C.L. DRAWING NO. 601 -40076
-, r• .
STAFF REPORT v"
O��l
DATE: May 20; 1981
TO: City Council and city Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer.
BY: John L. Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Advertising Paving Contract for Resurfacing and
Repla;;ement of Damaged Pavement
1977
The enclosed sketch is highlighted to indicate the spot locations
of damaged pavement. It has become necessary to repair these areas
where extraordinary street maintenance is pending. Each area is
subject to either extensive use (Base Line) or costly maintenance
(Turquoise).
Due to the nature of these items, the City is unable to effectively
replace the damaged pavement or install ample protective devices
to insure reduced maintenance. Each area is in itself comparatively
small. However, the total combination has created a need for a
contract. The City Engineer's Estimate for construction of this
contract is $70,000.00.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer
to advertise and seek bids for pavement repair, replacement and
installation and issue a contract for such activities.
Respectfully submitted,
Y.K *1�17
LBII :JLM:jaa
1%3
I Z-
I i,
� z
ili 7� I
WON
moml
M
ffil
HIMEmme
IZCMOVE 4 PEPLACE
Ov OVERLAY
INSTALL
......... .....
Py ... I ............
24 ov
0
•
V STAFF YREPORT
`w`
DATE: May 20, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Authorization to Seek Bids for City -Wide Emergency
and Normal Equipment Pavement Repair
During the past year since tha City has been performing its own
street maintenance, it has been necessary" to use heavy equipment
rental and contractor services as was intended in the Maintenance
Program. However, it has been a cumbersome process.
Efficiency of the process of supplementing City forces with con-
tractual services, dependability of services available, response
time and unit cost would be greatly improved by an annual agree-
ment between the City and a contractor.
The contract basically covers six services:
1. Emergency Pavement Repair
2. Emergency Equipment Rental
3. Urgent Pavement Repair
4. Urgent Equipment Rental
5. Normal Pavement Repair
6. Normal Equipment Rental
Where emergency is defined as: a condition where an imminent hazard
exists, which may cause injury to public person or property, need-
ing immediate attention as determined by the City Engineer.
Where urgent is defined as: a condition that may become an emergency
if not corrected in a reasonable time as determined by the City
Engineer.
Where normal is defined as: routine maintenance.
LFF
Authorization to Seek Bids for City -Wide
Emergency and Normal Equipment Pavement Reaair
May 20, 1981
Page 2
•
Pavement repair is defined as: skin patching of depressions, over-
laying of high use areas, replacement of deteriorated areas, minor
shoulder and widening, minor berm placement, and repairs as a result
of a storm or other causes.
Where equipment rental is defined as: shoulder grading (minor mainte-
nance item) , debris removal and other minor earth work.
Pros_oective bidders are made aware that the City has patching equip-
ment and grading and debris removal equipment (tractor and trucks)
and the intent of the contract is to supplement the City in an
emergency, when the work load at any given time is too great, or
the nature of the project is such that it is more efficient to use
contract services. Also, that the contract is not intended for
capital improvements and the City may enter into other contracts as
needed. The dollar amount of any single project will not exceed
$5,000 unless unusual circumstances exist and the annual amount is
estimated to be less than $50,000 unless unusual circumstances such
as a storm disaster exists.
RECOMME14DATION
Recommend that Council authorize the seeking of bids for emergency •
and normal equipment pavement repair, shoulder grading and debris
removal maintenance intended to supplement City forces in time of
need.
l( —jR
Respectfully
Rsppeectfully submitted,
J � 11k ,
LBII :MP: j as
L
l J
0
L
L
n
CITY OF RANCHO Cl,'CAYfO \G ?.
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Carnelian Landscape Project
In response to City Council's decision to improve Carnelian land-
scape and to restore other parkways as outlined in the May 12, 1981
budget session memorandum, the following items must be accomplished.
From the Reserve Fund $170,000 needs to be transferred to a General
Fund account for the project. Authorization must be granted to
recruite six part -time employees for sixty days and finally, solic-
itation of irrigation parts, plant material and equipment rental
must be secured. Due to the limited time span with which to attract
college students for temporary personnel, the above items need to
be expedited.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the Finance Director
to transfer $170,000 from the Reserve Fund to a General Fund account
and that the Assistant City Manager recruit six temporary personnel
for a period of sixty working days. Additionally, that City Council
authorize the solicitation of bids for irrigation parts, plant
materials and equipment rental and that Council award the bid to the
lowest responsible bidder.
Respectfully s bmitted,
LBFi: DL: jaa
A� 7
0
•
49
CITY Of RA\CFIO CUCAj'vIOXGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20,-1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Advertising of Contract for City -Wide Landscape and
Irrigation Maintenance
For the past year and a half, maintenance of City improved parkways
has been provided through a contract with Southern California Land-
scape Maintenance Company, first term contract low bidder. The
arrangement has been satisfactory and appears to be the most econo-
mical approach to providing this type of service.
The 1981 -1982 contract is basically the same with one exception, if
the contract is mutually acceptable to the City and contractor, the
agreement can be extended for an additional twelve months starting
July, 1982. Renewal will be subject to Council approval and will
not exceed 108 of the contract amount.
RECD %1ENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve advertising for bids
to provide parkway maintenace services for the 1981 -1982 fiscal year
with possible extension into the 1982 -1983 fiscal year.
Respectfully submitted,
LBli:DL:jaa
/�
•
•
19
l TTV nc D A \YLVI ( 1 Y`:\ 4 V \T..1 rVCA. fn.
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engneer
BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance supervisor
SUBJECT: Advertising of Contract for City -wide Street Tree
Service for 1981 -1982
1977
For the past year and a half, maintenance of City trees has been
provided through a contract with West Coast Arborist Company, first
term contract low bidder. The arrangement has been satifactory and
appears to be the most economical approach to providing this type
of service.
The 1981 -1982 contract is basically the same with one exception, if
the contract is mutually acceptable to the City and contractor, the
agreement can be extended for an additional twelve months starting
July, 1982. Renewal will be subject to Council approval and will
not exceed 10% of the contract amount.
RECOHNEM)ATION
It is recommended that Council approve advertising for bids to pro-
vide parkway maintenance services for the 1981 -1982 fiscal year with
possible extension into the 1982 -1983 fiscal year.
Respectfully submitted,
LBli:DL:jaa
.fc
•
9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 26, 1981 'gym
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 4773 and Real Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement
On January 24, 1979, the Planning Commission adopted ,resolution
79 -08 approving Parcel Map 4773, located on the east side of
Etiwanda, south of 24th Street and requested a lien agreement
for construction of off -site improvements including a 26 foot wide
paved access from Etiwanda at the time Lot 2 is developed.
The developer, Gary %ortepeter, has submitted the attached lien
agreement and final map for Council approval.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the City Council and City Engineer to sign
Parcel Map 4773 and accept the Real Property Improvement Contract
and Lien Agreement.
Respectfully sub fitted,
LBH:BH: j as
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. SI- .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NU14BER 4773,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4773)
AND REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 4773, submitted by
Gary Kortapeter, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the east
side of Etiwanda, south of 24th Street, being a division of lot 11,
block "B" of Etiwanda Colony Lands as recorded in Book 2, page 24 was
approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on
February 18, 1981; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 4773 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met by entry into an Real Property Improvement Contract 8 Lien
Agreement by Gary Kortapeter as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga. California, that said improvement agreement and
said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same
are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
• improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 4773 be and the
same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present
same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of ,1981,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip 0. Schlosser, Mayor
is Lauren f4. Wasserman, City Clerk
J
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -09
• A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
CO:54I5SION APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO, 4773 TO
DIVIDE 1.9 ACRES OF LAND INTO TWO LOTS LOCATED
850' EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 950' NORTH OF
SUMMIT AVENUE IN THE R -1 ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 30th day of November, 1978, a formal application was filed
wits. the City Planning Division; and
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of January, 1979, the Planning Commission held a
meeting to consider said project and continued to February 14, 1979; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on October 24, 1979 reconsidered the previous
approval and modified the conditions as listed herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the proposed map is consistent with the proposed
® General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
2. That the design for improvements of the proposed
. subdivision is consistent with applicable general
and specific plans for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed
density of development.
4. That the design of the proposed improvements is not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife
or other habitat.
S. That the design nor the type of improvements is not
likely to cause serious public health problems.
6. That the design or the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
SECTI0:: 2: That this land division will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on February 140 1979.
SECTION 3: That Parcel Map No. 4773 is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. An irrevocable offer of dedication of 30' for street
purposes shall be made on Lot 1 and Lot 2 and recorded
with the Final Parcel Map.
5a
I
2. At the time of development of Lot 2, a 26' wide paved
access from Etiwanda Avenue to the eastern property line •
of Lot 2 shall be installed at the Lot 2 owner's expense.
A lien agreement prepared by the applicant to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be provided and
recorded with the Final Map to guarantee the 26' wide
paved access installation at Lot 2 owner's expense.
3. The applicant shall provide all the construction plans for
drainage and street improvements for the 26' width of pavement
prior to the recordation of the final map and to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer from Etiwanda Avenue to
the end of Lot 2.
4. Sanitary sewers and water systems shall be designed and ...
coordinated with the Cucamonga County water District Stan-
dards.
5. The owner of Lot 2 shall coordinate and pay where necessary
for the relocation of any public utilities at the time of
construction of the 26' width of pavement.
6. The propsoed subdivision shall meet the provisions of Zone
D of the National Flood Insurance Program.
7. All requirements of the Southern California Edison and
Southern California Gas Company shall be met.
S. The City Engineer shall make the determination pursuant to •
Section 66436 (C-1) of the Subdivision Map Act of the
division and development of the property will not unreasonably
interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public
entity or public utility right-of -way or easements. The
signature of any public entity or utility may be omitted
from the final map and written notification of objections
is not filed with the City within the time limits specified
in section 66436 (C -1).
9. The developer shall meet all final map requirements of the
City including, but not limited to, providing traverse
calculation sheets, copies of recorded maps and deeds used
as reference and /or showing original land division tie notes
and bench marks that are referenced thereon.
10. All requirements of the Foothill Fire District shall be complied
with.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 1979.
PLANNI;IG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CCCA.NONGA
U
a
e .I
x
[
TENTATIVE. I
:: "ti X
Xxl[r � er ..�PNan _
`
PARCEL MAP NO.'. 4 71-7,3.t
y S
IN I.E [I11 0I P1M[NO CYCLX OMGI -
-I
FFF 1� 1 _
SIK SOIVIf1O161[w11N6[Or 1
_ l
ll'CS
AS N
(( +v. r
rw[xry -raWrx St.
--�,::
} ,
,.•.,,....",. I mss,.: �,» i"' - -_ "I '<°�.� :
:.°' _
� •
_ ____ �
—
—itl ✓ \_I IUMMIT'> E
OZ —
e .I
x
0
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
and
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9320 -C Base Line Road
Post office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
THIS AGRE &SENT, made and entered into this Inch day of
February, 1981, by and between Gary A. and Cecelia Eortapeter (hereinafter
referred to a$ "Developers '), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as
'City'), provides as follows:
WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of
a building permit for residential development an Parcel No, 2, the
City requires the construction of 26' wide, paved access from Etiwanda
Avenue to the easterly property line of Lot 2 of Parcel 4773.
WHEREAS, Developere desire to postpone construction of sue*
improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided
that Developers enter into this Agreement requiring Developers to
construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand
to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the
City may construct said improvements if the Developers fail or neglect
to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property
hereinafter described as security for the Developers' performance, and
any repayment due City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE:
1. Developers hereby agree that they will install off -site
street improvements, in accordance and compliance with all applicable
ordinances, resolutions, rules Ind regulations of the City in effect
at the time of the installation. Said improvements shall be installed
upon and along Parcel Nap 4773, including 26' wide, paved access from
Etiwanda Avenue to the easterly property line of Lot 2. •
56
n
u
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map number 4773 as per map
recorded in Book of Parcel Maps, Page
records of San Bernardino County.
S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes
described above.
6. Now, therefore, if the Developers shall faithfully
perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this
Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void; otherwise, it shall
remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered
and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and
obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by
the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any
other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on reel property.
7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure
to the benefit of the heirs, executors. administrators, successors and
assigns of each of the parties hereto.
5�V
2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed
not later than one (1) year following written notice to Developers
from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation Of
said improvements shall be at not expense to the City.
3. In the event Developers fail or refuse to complete the
installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any
time thereafter, upon giving Developers written notice of its intention
to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and c no late
said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the
City from Developers.
4. To secure the performance by Developers of the terms
and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City
of any funds which may be expenued by City in completing said improvements
upon default by Developers hereunder, Developers do by these presents
grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described
real property situated in the City of Bancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, to -wit:
•
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map number 4773 as per map
recorded in Book of Parcel Maps, Page
records of San Bernardino County.
S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes
described above.
6. Now, therefore, if the Developers shall faithfully
perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this
Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void; otherwise, it shall
remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered
and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and
obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by
the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any
other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on reel property.
7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure
to the benefit of the heirs, executors. administrators, successors and
assigns of each of the parties hereto.
5�V
8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement
as a mortgage, the teem "Developers- shall mean "mortgagors" and the
City shall be the "mortgagee" as chose terms are used in the Civil
Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to
mortgages on real property.
9. If legal action is commenoed to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum Which the City is
entitled to recover from Developers hereunder or to foreclose the
right of the Developers to redeem the above- described property from
the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be
awarded by the Court.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the day and year first above Written.
CITY:
DEVELOPERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, d municipal
�� /Y'-=-
^
/
-/
corporation
BY:
^__< •
PHILLIP D, SCH LOSSEft
Mayor
ATTEST:
LAUREN M. WASSER.MAN
City Clerk
�7
•
0
•
0
MY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20; 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 6544, Bonds and Agreements
The subject map received tentative approval by the Planning Commiss
on December 22, 1980 for the division of 19.9 acres of land into 3
parcels for industrial use located at the northeast corner of Haven
Avenue and Sixth Street.
Solen Enterprises, developer, has submitted Improvement Agreement
and Improvement Security for construction of off -site improvements
as required by the City Engineer.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolut
authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map and
forward it to the County Recorder, and also to accept and sing the
agreement and security.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:BK: j as
Attachments
�L
RESOLUTION NO. �I -7v
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6544,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.6544)
IMFROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 6544, submitted by Sonlen
Enterprises, and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the northeast
corner of Haven and 6th Street, being a division of a portion of Lots 13
and 14 of section 13, T1S, R7W as recorded in Book 4, Page 9, map of
Cucamonga Fruit Lands was approved by the City Engineer of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on December 22, 1930; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6544 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable
improvement security by Sonlen Enterprises as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and
said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same
are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
• improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 6544 be and the
same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present
same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
mot_,
•
A
CJTV Or R INa-iO CCCA,\ (oxcl
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20; 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
PRObI: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Xrall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Map, Bonds and Agreements for
Parcel Map 6617
The subject map received tentative approval by Planning Commission
on January 28, 1981, for the division of 17.65 acres into three
(3) parcels in the M -2 zone, located at'the northeast corner of
Haven and Arrow Route. Daon Corp., the developer, has submitted
for acceptance an improvement agreement and improvement security
for the construction of a median island on Haven Avenue. Off -site
construction for Arrow Route and Haven Avenue has been previously
bonded under Parcel Map 6206.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolu-
tion authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the
map and forward it to the County Recorder, and also to accept and
sign the agreement and security.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
4r0
e
TENTATIVE n,
PARCEL MAP N0. 6617 „w
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S1PLrr„
+Ilw. ++uwoln UOw pr nnot... or ruac....xo iter,.f rG v.r u<oecle
reor a .eo n -.r,�w •a orna or
7"' A
nu.noui c°°wn, n.n or c.oronxn. na.e««
II� ln/ /t0`H'N Oee \
"Il Ir' /�/ 1� '///, '',•I,1 I 1 1 � (/ IJ t1 1(X; '':: I. nl�e�+ ^rl�rrr Iron
rnnm: ua PA CEL l E
I 'P11L '3 1
J
I I'� ^/ ♦� dr.' /v(on: n.�r: /fir avr./ 11 +br /]q' • I 1 .-� i i
ivrt
_ _.miuunh— — "i• `' .` ..o4r..— ,r1IPL u. n.
— YnNIO: M -]
'NOwITY MAP r
RESOLUTION NO. `I-
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NP
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6617,
( PARCEL
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT. SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 6617, submitted by Daon Corp., and
consisting of 3 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route
and Haven Avenue, being a division of Parcel 24 of Parcel Map 6206 as
recorded in Book 59, Pages 91 -95, San Bernardino County Recorders Office
was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
on January 28, 1981; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Mao Number 6617 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as Prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable
improvement security by Daon Corporation as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and
said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same
are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
• improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel flap Number 6617 be and the
same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present
same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Prillro D. Schlosser, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
�r X
•
Is
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20; 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT.: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Conditional
Use Permit 81 -04
The attached bonds and agreement is submitted by The Vineyard
National Bank for the off -site improvements for CUP 81 -04 to
be constructed on Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill Blvd.
A resolution is attached for the acceptance of the bonds and
agreement in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance $47,000.00
Labor and Material $23,500.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolu-
tion and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept
the agreement and security.
Respp,.e, /c�`/tfully submitted,
Jam/ U ��-ZL , G
LBH:BY,:jaa
Attachments
7
�'J
RESOLUTION NO. '21) - :
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO AGREEMENTCA D N CALIFORNIA
IMPROVEMENSECURITYO FOR CUP IMPROVEMENT
81 -004.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration and Improvement Agreement executed
on May 20, 1981 by Vineyard National Bank as developer, for the improvement
therein generally located 180 feetrsouthrofeFoothill oncthe west side
of Vineyard, and;
WHEREAS, the installation of such irovements, described in
mp
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred
to Planning Commission, CUP No. 81 -04; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement;
N011, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and
said improvement security be and the same are hereby Agreement on behalf
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said ICityv Clerk to attest thereto.
• of the city of Rancho Cucamonga,
PASSED, APPROVED, ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981.
AYES;
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman- , City - CTerk
Phi lip D. Schlosser, Mayor
0.
0
9
CITY OF
1tA \CI 10 CUCANIM'GA
ITI:.\ I
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION runlaT: sc\l.r•.:
NORTI I
CITY OF RANCHO CDCA.40NCA •
FMPROVEIENT AGREEI(M.
UM ALL MEN By IHESE PRESMS: That this agreement 1s made and entered
Into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Cede and Regula-
tions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal car-
,station, hereinafter referred tom as the City, by and between vaid City and
hereinafter referred to as the Developer
HITNEESETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer he. requested approval by
the City of, RANCHO COCGHONG4 in accordance
with the provisions of the report of the Community Davelopment Director
then, and may amendments thereto; located 180 feet south of Foothill
on the west side of Vineyard
and,
WHEREAS, the City has established certain ris,timments to be met by said
developer prior to granting the final approval of the development-, and
4MERGS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are dessert to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing
said approval{
NON, TREREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Develope�
as follows:
1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all
improvements described on page 3 hereof within one (1) Year
from the date hereof.
2. The term of this agreement shall be One (1) year , c.rcing o n
a
the date of execution hereof by the City. Ibis agreement shall be in
default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless
said coon has been extended as hereinafter provided.
1. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provi-
sions of this agreement, in writing me less than four weeks prior to
the default date, and including a smiscast of circumstances of n mcm.,Ity
for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards,
cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
adjust vents thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
4. If the Oweloper fails or neglects to cmply with the prwisioe, of this
'greener[, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provi-
slnns to be completed by any lawful me.irs, and thereupon to recover from
+id Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred in so
doing.
S. Encroachment permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office
of the City Engineer prier to start of any work within the public right
of way, and the developer shall conduct such work In full compliance with
the regulations contained therein. Nan - compliance may r e sult in stepping
01 the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties pro. ided.
b. public right of way Improvement work required shall be constructed in
conformanee with approved improvement plan,, Standard sped litatlnm
and standard Den.1s a and any special anen.Ments thereto. Coastm.;.n Ift
mall include any transitions and /or other Incidental work deemed necersar
for drafnagr or public safety.
6'4
age 2
is IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
7, Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple-
tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the
event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
means.
8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re-
moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system.
9, The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and
other debris from the b n said t
frighrofwa resulting from work done on
the adjacent property or within
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the
aroval of the C" The rincipal mount security shall be ity
notAlessn than the amount shown bel w� said improvement
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED
Faithful Performance Bond S 47,000
Material and Labor Bond S 27.500
• IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
DEVELOPER /
BY:
BY: ' \ 'S- DATE: Y $%/ —
GATE:
t
WITNESS`/ \ 'sQ DATE: C -ReI
' CITY OF RANCHO CUC 10NGA, CALIFORNIA ,
ATTEST:_
DATE
a
a mmnicipal corporation
67
CLERK
I:IPROVF.MENT AGREE- ENT PAGE
In OF H,,c,O CUCA80gCA 1
C(,,STRUCTIOY AND BOND ESTM% -'E
E.4CDOAC,,ENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Attach to "t nspecto['s Copy')
PF.Ptr[T NO.
co. PMED BY L. n rn ineerinn •
File ReEemnce CUP 81 -04 City Drawing NO-$— — — —�
NOTE: Does nor Include current Eee EOr writing permit mr Pavemmr replace-
ment depos i[a.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTTNATE
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 41 Ann
INSPFCT104 FEES
IT f:M
IIANT Y NI n5 w
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION -
nf Enn�I nrttinn Cnac F ^t mntr L.S. L.S. L.S.
PaV ••..,T nu P. ¢n L.F.
PE R:fANF.At PAVEMENT RKPLAUMENT r1.
STORE :ITT FR} \h IN RICNT- OF -40
I. TOTAL [NSPF.Ct ION FEES .
5 2,051 00
tl. CO:IPACTIOY TEST FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' . . 20G 00 •
ill. 10% CONTI4GENCIE5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17. DESTOII FEES (l0: of Tntal Cerltru tln
cr/On Cast Esate) TOTAL 0H 0
Faithful Perfocmanre Bond $ 47,000 _
Natecial and Labor Band $ 13.500
Na intenante Bond S
Cash Y. numenting Deposit 5
•
Bong No: 490064
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE FOND
WFIEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK (IN ORGANIZATION)
(hereinafter designated as "principal") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated MAY , 19 BI , and identified as
Project CUP 1 -04, 180 feet south o! Foothill on the west side of V'ne and
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and S _RETY INSURANCE
COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA r as surety, are held and
firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
- City' 1, in the penal sum of
forty -seven le-. —d collars 1 law vl
money r the United States, or the payment of which sue well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi-
tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration
thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and effect,
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be axed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec-
ifications Bosoms eying the same shall in anywlse affect its
obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any
such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
,arms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
IN WETNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by the principal and surety above named, on MAY T
19�L,
RCEZ1 �lJ
VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK (N-ORGANIZATION)
SURETY �IJRSUR�A�NC/E FOMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
W. Naderer, Attarney-In -Fact
BOND NO: 490064 •
TABOR AND } TERIALMEN B0ND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and NpT nNp PA NI( 1 N OR f Gl! lATION)
(hereinafter designated as °prlmapal ") have entered mto an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated NAY , 1981 , and identified as pro-
. ject CUP 81 -04 180fee sou N Of FoolhilT, td—
1a hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(Coraencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the
Civil Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons etpityaa in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of
Seenty -three thousand -five hundred o lays IS or .,..- crisis
teraishcd or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under
the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor,
that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the fib
amount "reinebove set forth, and also in case suit is brought
upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing_ such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as casts and to be included in the iudoment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (...nursing
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brcuchc upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become,null and void, otherwise it shall be
' and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terns of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying the sane shall in
any man r. ur affect its obligations on this bond, and it dean here-
by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad-
dition.
IN WI^::ESS WIEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by 19 BI, principal and surety above named, on MaY 7
VI RETARD NATIONAL BANK( lNyB&FNI ZATIUN)
BY :..L�`21 [- yam" = t2- GIFi1-
SURETY INSURIANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA .
K. w. Na--or Pry -In -Fart
RCE24
0
•
9
CITY OF RANCI -10 Ch'CANIO \'CA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20; 1981 UL_
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer,
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security for Conditional Use Permit 80 -02
The attached bonds and agreement have been submitted by Western
Commercial Development Co. for the off -site improvements for
CUP 80 -02 located at the northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and
Lion street.
A resolution is attached for the acceptance of the bonds and
agreement in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance $55,000.00
Labor and Material $27,500.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolu-
tion and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the
agreement and security.
Respectfully submitted,
l� /U
l
LBH:DK:jaa '
Attachments
RESOLUTION N0.
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP NO. 80 -02.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed
on May 20, :981 by Western Commercial Development Co. as developer, for
the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located at the northwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Lion Street.
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred
to Planning Commission, CUP No. 80 -02; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and
said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
c
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
/ c,C.
0
0
CITY nF ITr%i:
RANCHO CUC NI0\GA TITIYr �_cu° xo —oz
ENGINEERING DIVISION I:NInrrr• sc:v.1
%'
NORTI I
CIV 0E RANUO CUCAMW%gA
IMPROVC!ENT ACREEMENT
RNOA ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered
into, in ce nfo mane¢ with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regula-
tions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, state of California, a municipal c -
pmra n, het. inaf[er referred c5 au the City, ey and between said City' and
fined to.�, roc .•1�...G:r..,� o..,F.r y.
bercinafcer referred to as the Developer.
WT6MR . :
TMT, 4HEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by
the city of, RANCHO CUCAMONGA to a ord soda
with the provisions of the report of the mmeaunity Development Director
[hereon, and any amendments thereto; located
ON THE NORTMAESTCORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND LION STREET.
and,
developer the City M1gr established he f cart app requirements ev be me[ by and
deve to put prior to granting tM1C [foal approval of the development; and
FTDIREAS, the a r cutlen of this agreement and posting of Improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing
said approval;
SOW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer•
as fall...:
1. The developer hereb• agrees to construct at developer's expense all
improvements described on page J hereof within ONE 1) YEAR
frca the data hereof,
3. The term of this agreement shall be ONE (1) YLAR commencing o n
e
1111 dace of a curl. hereof by the City, This agreement shall be 1.
default on tbedo! following the last day of the term stipulated, unless
said tom has been extended as hereinafter provided.
]. The Developer may request additional time in Mich to complete the provi-
sions of this agreement, in writing me less than four weeks prior to
the default dace, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity
for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards,
ost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to requira
adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein,
4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
grement, the City shall have he right at any time to cause said provi-
n to be compluted by any lawful m and thereupon to recover from
sold Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so
d, nD.
5. Encrcarnment p rmits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office
of !3m City Engineer prior to start o/ any work within the pshift right
of v, and the dew -loper shall chndue, such woek In full scmpliance . ub
the r iulatinns contaiard [herein. Son - compliance may result in stopping
of the work by the City, and n,,essee., of she penalties provided.
6. Public rigid[ Of way improvement ...k required shall be ca rrs Ore tied in
cahromanco with ....cued improvement pl ms, Standard Speef[te ae tans,
And Standard Drawings and any special .Amendments thereto. Conacrueclon
shall include any transitions and /or .,het lneldencal work deemed nerezra
for drvnsgc ar public safety.
0
•
•
Pala 1
ItffdOVC;IL:R AGREEH'ENT
1. Vork h ne =ittin a xsttug streets shall be diliFCntly perr:oed to ca-ple-
tilm;,thm City Shed have tlw rinht in a Mpleto Ji, and all wArk in the
t-vuet of miju,zliud delav i mq,ieti —, anti to recover all lust and
expm,•e in,urlud from the Dueuloper and /., his contracts by A . lA.,.,
B. the "I" -ItTal 41111 he responsible far replucemen[, re lew[io n, or r -
vnl of any wmpanent of a Illation vatnr system Ill 1.aflia Nit!,
the rvqui red Nark to he satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the voter system.
9. The R velrper 0,11 he raslmnsib is far unnval of All louse rock and other
debri> from the Public right of way resulting from work done on the adjo-
ent property or within said rill, ofNA,.
10. 'rue Deeelnprr 11,111 11.1nt ,led maintain Parkway c,us se dlrected by the
Commtnity Deuelnpaene Di mccoc.
11. The improvement security to he furnished by the Davelnper to guarantee
nnpletion of tho terms of this agreement s , all be subject to the a,,rat,ax
of 11.e City Attorney. The p,itei,al a art of said inp rovenent sec.tity
shall be not less than che,nmeunt shown below:
I1IFROVASFT SECLSITY SUBHITTED: Faithful Performance Bond
TYPE SURETY /AGENT PRINCIPAL MOUNT
S 55,000.00
llaoerEal and Labor Bond S 17,500.00
IN Wlr4ESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused them presents to be duty
elltulld and arl. now hedged wf th It f...lities required by law no the dates
se, forth a,Ppostte they silnatmes:
DEVELOPER
at-,. _ / �r..e..i DATE:
BY // DATE:
VIT:.I'S5: _ lll�> / C' DATE: Z ,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIOAGA, CALIFORINIA
a men Cr 1pal core orattan
BY: - _ MAYOR
ATTLST: , CIIY CLEM
DAIS:
CM OF &GXHO CVCXX.0:;SA
-ONSTRVC-.101 AND LO::D rITIX,%TE
ENCROACIPTNT PM-11T FEE SCHEDULE
(Attach In "Inspector's copy') •
D.%-,E:— April 29, 1981 PERMIT :;0. COTIPUTED , BS
File Rcfet,.ec CCF 80-02 City Drauing No.a. 410
>OYTC: Does not Include current fee for writi, p—it r pavement replace-
men, deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIY.ATE_
MIT
OMINTM
OMIT
U';!T CO[ T
S ,V!O- :T
—
IV: 'T I.- 8W
14,006
qIFm
5 n 17?
T,
RISC
.
L.P.
10'.
.4no
PA%K,V;L
S.F.
2.
1, 900
A. C. dL.01
---
L.
S
CIR3 I G;T--,R
4Q3
6, no
I AIR
EL
S.F.
---
---
A 1 T L;,, L..
S*F*
1-7q
$ 27,500.00
D.iP.7 4,1t.10"'c.tES
930
S F
S.F.
—
210
1 741
M sli E 0 1 E BASES
%S E
R PSO
�q . F.
6�1A
1 A14
'Te— 1,11IM!
2
r,
I 50n M on
3,QQ0
2" \ 4" ?KP1;00D HEA9ER
F
L. F.
---
STRUT 5:.::S
EA.
A
4ni
96
F
F
C I::
2
_1
'Al.
9
A,Irl
LA:�PSC.�P . % !RMATIll';
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 4o t,,
i:;t?EcTin,, rFE.s
I
1,
TCTAT.
❑:SPFC.TTn!; Far . . . . . .
. . . . . .
2352.SC
.
IT.
MroCTNII:
TP.ST MIS . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
.
L.P.
10'.
rr�TT:;GE:ICjO.S
STGa- ol—T,11. V!
PFFS (10'. of Total Co nst
... 11an Coo,
S
I
1,
TCTAT.
❑:SPFC.TTn!; Far . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
.
IT.
MroCTNII:
TP.ST MIS . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
.
ITT.
10'.
rr�TT:;GE:ICjO.S
PFFS (10'. of Total Co nst
... 11an Coo,
S
TOTAL
Fallhf-1 PlIf-Inant. Sr ... d
55,05.010
MILtli.11 "d L.rLnr Bond
$ 27,500.00
Brad
$
1
Cash .4 ... lvclj,, Deposit
$
ACE22E
Izi
Bond Re. 80838322
• premium: $413.00
FnIY_L PSRFO A'. :ASCE 9OHD
lniCREAS, the City Council of the City o: Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and -A�� C -�truction Co., Inc.
( hereinafter designated as "pa r.<vpal ") have entered into an
acree,,ent whereby principal agrees to install and <coplete cer-
tzin desk mated vublic imp:evements, which said a.- neent,
,at April 30 1081 -
project and icm't'ti_a as
M.a 1t p]ua P182a
is hereby ;e_e r: ac to anc made a par; r.e roof, and,
1':HESEAS, said Principal is xecuired under the to cs o'_ szid
agreement t furnish a bond for the faithful c rfcrrance of said
agreement. -
NOW, THER,ODP , we the principal and SESjeral Insurance
5MIPn° as surety, are meld and
fi_aly ..pine un.o the City o: Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
"Ci:y "), in the penal sum of Fifly Five thousand .a dd n. /10_0
money o: the Unrtec States, for the payment oU[ hynh su yell and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, e::ecu-
pres and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
• bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and yell and truly keep and perforr,� the covenants, condi-
ons and provisions in line said agreement and any alteration
thereof rade as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
Y.-Pt and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all resterts a<cordicg to their true inGeni and
r..ea nine, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
.cents and er..p lcyees, as therein stipulated, then this obl,datim,
.bell null and void; Otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and of fe <t.
•
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred -by city in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or' addition to the terms of the
a c:¢enent or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec -
i'icaticns "Cen'Panying the sane shall in anywise affect its
obliccticns on this band, and it does hereby waive notice of any
sueh ch,:oc e, exGrns ion of
Yn r tire, alteration or addition to the
ms o: the aq...msdt er to the work or to the specifications.
1❑ WITNESS f:IiEP'W'oi, this instrument has been duly executed
by the - ;ncnpol and surety above named, on April 30
13 8�
RCIt3
77
MLLBR CONSTRU TON C ., INC.
By: ( /
PH nc pa
FEORRA,L INSURANCF�tOMP
By:,nt,ir( -�: ✓ILIA
Rebecca Sue Starr Attornay -Fact
Bond No. 80828322
•
LABOR AND :WTZRIALME. BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rareho Cucamonga,
State of California, and Keller Construction Cc , Inc.
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal pgrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated April 30 1 1981 , and identified as pro-
ject Music Plus Plaza
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and-
Ylt_REAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cea-
nonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(ccnmerc ing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the
Civil Code of the States of California.
NOW, THERSFORE, said principal and the undersicnad as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Cade of Civil Procedure
in the sum of
Dollars IS n sin nn or materials
urnished or labor thereon of any kind, of for amours due under
the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such :fork or labor
&.m ,•
that said surety will pay the same in an ount not exceeding the
amount hereisabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought
upon this bend will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforeinm sue..
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
coroorations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (cermencirq
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a rich t of action to them or their assign in any ..it
brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall becume,null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agroement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in
any miner affect its obli.:ations on this bond, and it does here-
by aaive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad-
dition.
I:: NI'::CSF WRERCOP, this instrument has been duly executed
by tho principal and surety above named, on April 30
19 91 .
KELLER CONSTRUCT t /O /t(4 /CO .,ZINC,
BY: 1�6)fd, f.Yr,
7 � PrincipT�
�EeMRAL INSURANCE LOOM /PANY •
eb
�t coca Suo Starr AttOrney -in-Fact
0
•
7
✓ SFAFF~REPORT v
DATE: May 20; 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Purchase of Real Property by County Flood Control
The County Tax Collector has forwarded five copies of "Agreement
to Purchase Tax Deeded land" to the City for approval and execu-
tion.
The approval of the City is required under Section 3775 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code, so that the property may be purchased.
There are three pieces of land available due to default in tax
payments and all are adjacent to Flood Control rights -of -way. The
County Board of Supervisors has, by resolution, declared its inten-
tion to purchase the lands for use as flood control right -of -way.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council authorize the Mayor to sign each
copy of the two agreements and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
Also, to direct the City Clerk to return each document to Joe Bell,
County Tax Collector.
Respectfully /submitted,
LBH:jaa
Attachments
0
0
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
_.; i yL _ ' VICINITY NIAP ti%1
s
nitre
OFFICE OF TAX COLLECTOR
Fret Floor. Hall of Records • 172 West Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415 • (714) 393 @165
April 13, 1981
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Hall
9320 Baseline Rd.
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Attn: City Clerk
Dear Sir:
County of San Bernardino
JOE BELL
Treasu.e Tao Collacto*
Chapter 8 Sale #288
In order to process the above numbered sale the Mayor and City
Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga should-'sign the enclosed
Agreement to Purchase Tax Deeded Land by the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District.
Original Signatures and seal are required on each copy. If you
have any questions please call 714 383 -2306.
Very truly yours,
JOE BELL
County Treasurer -Tax Collector
By:l�
Margot Wight, 'hiief
Secured Property Division
enc.
��I
6' "r. 0" . l t^ 0
CITY ADmitiI� RATIONONGA
APR 15 1961
AM PM
glg)9110)1h>Zil(�(3)4(5)6
•
7
�v ) ern- Urr)Ut ivit iv -Vf;
. DATE January 5, 1981 -
rn ru •. enr.o f
FROM DI PIETRO / _ %�� ` ��1N'''E J4pG �1 ;
Flood Lon[r�� rf'I"�1`r� �- v� :•;�. l r
TO THE )IONCRABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS /'
1- 601/2.00, 2- 218/2.00, 3- 401/2.0(
_File Nos: 1- 801/2.00, 2- 70112.00, 4- 101 /2.0(
F.C.U. - Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4 - Day Creek, San Sevaine Clrannol, MuscoLt Storm Drain,
SUBJECT Santa Ana River, San TimoLco Creek and Hojnve River - Supervisorial Districts 1,
2-And 3 - Tax Parcels_, OI?por tune pt, rchase
RECO?CIENDATION
Adopt a formal Resolution objecting to the public sale of tax delinquent proper-
ties in Zones 1, 29 3 and 4 and authorize their purchase by the District in
accordance with provisions of Chapter 8 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
BACRCROUND 1NFORIIATION
A review of .he Tax Collector's listing of tax delinquent properties indicates
that several parcels identified on attached list are within the District's present
or planned flood control facilities for Day Creek, San Sevaine Channel, Muscott
Storm Drain, Santa Ana River, San Timoteo Creek and the Mojave River.
REASONS FOR PJECOt CIENDATION
TLese parcels can be acquired by this opportune tax sale procedure at relatively
low purchase costs and can be put to use in connection with the facilities noted
• above.
FIiL NCIAL DATA
Total purchase costs, except for advertising costs, are expected to be $11,060.00:
Payment of this amount is not expected to be required until the forthcoming fiscal
year. The District will budget for purchase of delinquent tax property in the
right -of -way tax sales account.
CJD:Atpl:jss (Ext. No. 2684)
Encls: Tax Sale Parcel Lis[ ° "" �:• �.r. G,�{:J
Flaps and Plats � V CW
cc: Robert Ri gncy, CAD 1
7 �
RL'CO MENDEn FOR BOARD APPROVAL:
JA .' 5 f
/!) cc: EPWA, Fl nod Control, Tax Collector,
-- 'v'1 ?_ Auditor,�Tl�w /resolution
JOIIN H. B L�),IrAdr,in i St rotor
I:nvirmune [!1 Public hocks Agency
i
r
• MINUTES OF THE '$OARD OF SUPERVISORS
1 •. J
OF SAN BERN2,ROIIIO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA •
i:I:soi.0 r t NN No. u1 -1
RE: REAL PROPEXH: F /C: IT011I:9T'1' BUY:
FICOII CONTROL: %ANCS l 2,_ 1,F 4, 3A.Y CRCEK, SAN SIIYA7NE I:IIANNI_I.. SA;r(A APA RIVEN, SAN
TT 1110M1'r0 CBI'. LI., anA NOLL;I; Still 4 OunIAI. OaliKurlo.110 SAM, OI'- IUUI,IC ti_I._Nt_\'Alt }OIiS PARCELS;
APPROV1:1) AND wilIORiZE I'UICITA5E
on motion of Supervisor Tn'AD'v'Crid duly seconded by S,lervisor Older and carried,
the follawlnG ti,telpli.ii is a1.,,cd:
RIL5(1LI T I ON_NOO.8 7 c4_
SNIERRAS, by action rnkon by tlm guard of snpecvisere of son Bernardino Cuunq, State o
California, the Tax Collector of said County h., been awLimrbod to sell certain tax -decd
property at public auction; and
IOIEREAS, certain of said tax - deeded parcels are needed for the public uses of flood
control and water conservation Purroses:
NON, TUEREFORE, be it resolved, that pursuant to Chopter R of The Revenue and Taxntimn
Code, the San Bernardino County Flood Control Nistriet, based wren the premises that the
hereinafter described parcels of property are needed for the aforesaid Public a , hereby
makes formal objection to the Public sale of said parcels and autiiertzes their purchase to
accordance with said Cede:
Assessor's Parcel 227 - 152 -12 Assessor's Parcel 278 - 172 -11
Assessor's Parcel 227- 152 -16 Assessor's Parcel 260 - 081 -01 11111.1-C
,
Assessor's Parcel 229 - 021 -55 —
Assessor's Parcel 238 - 172 -11 Assessor's Parcel 421 - 011 -49
b sessar's Parcel 421 - 011 -51 Assessor's Parcel 421 - 011 -58 •
Assessor's Parcel 1,21- 011 -59 Axse NSnr's Pnreel 421 - 011 -63
Assessor's Parccl 421 - 011 -66 Assessor's Parcel 141- 403 -09
BE IT FIIRTIICR RE019RD that the Clerk of this Board shall file with the County Tax
Collector and the County Board of Supervisors n certified vcry of this resolution.
PASSCD A60 ADOPTED by the Hoard of Supervisors of thin San Bernardino County Flood Can -
troi Dist -:,t, State of California by the following vote:
AYES: SVPr.RVISCRS: Older, 0,114 t, fIcKenna, Toratsend, Ila:;,Aock
NOES: SUPCRVISOR5: None
ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: IJOne
A AAAa•
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ss.
I, AndreC Di sharoon Secretary of the Board of surnrvl< ors of the Son
Bernardfae Crusty Flood Control District, San Bernardino, California, hereby certify
the forCgoing to be a (till, true and a err "PY of the ac Hon taken by said District
Board of Suprtvinurs, by a animout voter of the a —bet,. present, as the s.tee .Pp ca r::
to ill. Official Ninuten of said P.oard er it. moolin P. of Aanuar 11,21_•
Oaten: JAI; 5 1981
((J_r...� DenutY --
scr.rrtnry ( the P� rd of supervi :ors f son
Be r nard loo Cn bmd Con 1,rel D AI f C , San
'rD'LJII L; I `e ;I IJ I D Bc,n.r,din0 County, Cnl lfnrnfa.
,i 4,, M1
far, Gn•.J nN' ^u G,unly .
TiogI CJI:Ir01 p,51nC1
CO FU caC!!P.SE T :, :i DELDE LAIiD
. .r.iS .A,RTThIE7iT, made this day c. 198_
by and betro:een the Board of Sunervisors o` she County of San Pernar-
dino, State of Ca'_iforaia, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District, pursuant to the provisions of Division 1, Part 5, Chapter
B. of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
W I T N E S S E T H
THAT 'WHEREAS, the real property situated within the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, here-
inafter set forth and described in "Exhibit A ", attached hereto and
made a par; hereof`, has been deeded to the State of California for
the non - payment of delinquent taxes; and
WHEREAS such deed to the State for taxes includes taxes levied
• by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the taxes of
which on the property are collected by the County officers; and
WHT'TAS, the hereinafter- described property does not lie within
the boundaries of any taxing agency other than that, or those, spe-
cified hereinabove;
NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. That as provided by Section 3800 of the Revenue and Taxa-
tion Code, the cost of giving notice of this agreement shall be paid
for by the San Bernardino County Floor; Control District.
2, That the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernar-
dino a•,recs to sell to said San Rernardino County Flood Control Dis-
trict and said San Pernardino County Flood Control District agrees
• to purcha•ae from sai:1 Ccunty the property hereinafter set out in the
AB01 /01018
1 -16 -81
UJ Page 1 of 4
afcr.2_ai1 A" which shall not have been redeemed as orovid-
ad in the Revenue and Taxation Cone, upon payment by said District
to the ,ax Collector of said County the sum set forth in said "Exhibit•
A" arter the description of the property and designated "Purchase
Price ", within 45 days after this agreement becomes effective.
3. That said San Bernardino County Flood Control District will
not share in the distribution ofthe payment required by this agree-
ment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their re-
pective names to be hereunto subscribed and their respective seals
to be hereto affixed by their respective officers thereunto duly au-
thorized.
ATTEST: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO
By •ark or Board o Supervisors Chairman
By
Deputy
(Seal)
ATTEST:
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Secr^ -tart', San de rn.arclirlo
County Flood Control District
By
Chairman
A801/01018 •
145 -81
Page 2 of 4
"r
?ursuant to the provisions o' -action 377S :)F Revanuc and
Taxation Ccde, the ,overning body oC t'!e rity of Rancho Cu=anga her^ 7
agrees to the selling prig: as piovided in the above arrc��;e nt.
•
A=S-:
CIT•i OF RANCHO CTUCAMONGA
By
City Clerk
By
Deputy
(seal)
This Agreement was submitted to me before execution by the Board
of Supervisors and I have compared the sane with the records of the
Count; of San Bernardino relating to the real property described
therein.
•
ounty -0 4c�-
APPRO'1CD this day of
By
A801 101018
1 -16 -81
Page 3 of 4
CONTROLLER
•
A801 /01013 - AR7's: 227 - 152 -32
1 -16 -31 6 36;
J Page 4 of 4 229 - 021 -55
"EXHIBIT A"
•
DESCRIPTION
PURCHASE
FIRST YEAR
SALE
PRICE
DELINQUENT
NUMBER
Tract
7290 E 60 Ft Lot 9
$330.00
1975
22715232
Tract
7290 E 60 Ft Lots
5, 6 and 7 $530.00
1975
22715236
Nap of
Rochester Ely 60
Ft Lot 107 and $30.00
1975
22902155
Ely 60
Ft S 1/2 Lot 108
•
A801 /01013 - AR7's: 227 - 152 -32
1 -16 -31 6 36;
J Page 4 of 4 229 - 021 -55
:7
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
May 14, 1981 "P
TO: City Manager, City Council
FROM: Building Official `�9F.�'C",
SUBJECT: Resolution of street name changes - "Sequoia Avenue" to
"Civic Center Drive" and "Vincent Avenue" to "Maple Place"
Attached is a resolution, for consideration by the City Council, which would
effect changes of names for two streets within the Daon- Barton Project Area.
The present names were recorded as part of one of the parcel maps filed for
the acreage.
Sequoia Avenue, will be the southerly access to the property proposed for
the Civic Center /West Valley Courts project so it seems appropriate that
the principal access to the Civic Center be designated accordingly, hence
the proposal for "Civic Center Drive ".
"Vincent Avenue" is a one -block section of street that is discontinuous and
out of alignment with other portions of Vincent Avenue. 'Tlaple Place" is
consistent with other street names within the development and with the
street naming ordinance before the city council this meeting.
Because none of the buildings in the effected area are occupied, the change,
at this time, will avoid complications that could develop if delayed until
after tenants start moving in, printing stationery, etc.
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt the subject Resolution effecting the name changes.
JRG /ps
1�-S_
r
r
0
• RESOLUTION NO. 81 -�0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHANGING SEQUOIA AVENUE TO CIVIC
CENTER DRIVE AND VINCENT AVENUE BETWEEN ARROW ATE,
AND ELM AVENUE TO MAPLE PLACE.
WHEREAS, the street currently named "Sequoia Avenue is to
be the site of the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, and
WHEREAS, Vincent Avenue, north of, and intersecting with,
Arrow Route is discontinuous with other portions of Vincent Avenue,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the City Council, of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does hereby designate "Sequoia Avenue"
to, henceforth, be known as "Civic Center Drive" and that "Vincent Avenue"
between "Arrow Route" and "Elm Avenue" be henceforth be known as
"Maple Place"
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be directed
to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors,
County of San Bernardino as set forth in Section 34092 of the
Government Code, of the State of California.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren AI. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D, Schlosser, Mayor
v
0
7
1
y SIIFFMREPORT ,.
DATE: May 20, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Phase II of North Town Street Improvements
Authorization is requested to seek bids for the construction of
Phase II of the North mown Street Improvements. Work is estima-
ted at $135,000 and will include construction of portions of
Feron, Reid and Main Streets just easterly of Archibald Avenue.
The project is funded through Community-Development Block Grant
Funds and has been authorized by the County Economic Development
Department.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend that Council approve the seeking of bids for the con-
struction of Phase II of the North Town Street Improvements.
Respectfullpol
LB H: j a a
!%
ORDINANCE NO. N3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RASCHO CUCAMOHCT ",,FAPPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED
COMMUNITY P.C. 8001 LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHLAND
AVENUE GENERALLY NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND GENERALLY WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held various public hearings
on the Victoria Planned Community beginning on September 16, 1980 and
culmina Ling with April 2, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public
hearing on the Victoria Planned Community; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed
the land use, circulation, parks and open space, infrastructure, design
criteria, regulations, implementation sections of the Planned Community
text for Victoria; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed
the land use plan map for Victoria and required subsequent changes to
that map as a result of that review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Division Staff is directed to amend the
Official Zoning map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to indicate the
• subject property as "PC "; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Draft
Environmental Impact Report on the Victoria Planned Community relative
to its impacts and recommends certification to the City Council.
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby certify the Oraft EIR
as complete and final statement of the environmental effects of the
proposed project.
NO'.1, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
City Council does hereby adopt P.C. 80 -01, Victoria Planned Community,
subject to the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution
No. 81 -37 adopted April 2, 1981 attached hereto as reference.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in The Dally Report, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the rity oof Ontario, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSCO, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1981,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
j h
• ORDINANCE NO. /H
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE4µ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING (�c�
PROCEDURES FOR STREET NA
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish procedures for street
naming for new public and private streets in the City of Rancho Cucamonga
in the interest of uniformity and to avoid confusion to the public; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to establish a procedure for changing
existing street names in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has adopted Resolution No. 81 -29
establishing Street Naming Policy for Rancho Cucamonga on March 11, 1981,
The City Council does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1 - STREET NAMES
A. That street names should be pleasant sounding, appropriate,
easy to read (so that the public, and childred in particular,
can handle the name in an emergency situation), and should
add to the pride of home ownership and community.
• B. That the following types of street names are unacceptable:
numerical names (1st, 2nd, etc.); alphabetical letters
(A, B, C, etc.); frivolous, complicated or undesirable
names; unconventional spelling; compound names; given or
surnames of persons living or dead (Pioneer families,
historic persons, etc., excluded).
C. That streets which are continuous shall be extended in
accordance with the present street names wherever possible
and feasible.
D. That discontinuous streets shall not be given the same
name.
E. That duplication of existing or proposed street names is
prohibited. Similar sounding names are considered to
be duplication, regardless of spelling.
F. That in existing areas of the City, strive to have new
street names be consistent with the prevailing tbeme of north /south
streets named after gems and east /west streets named
after trees when possible and where feasible.
G. That streets with a 90 degree or more change of direction
shall change names at a convenient and appropriate point
as determined by the City Planner.
F-'3
Ordinance No.
Page 2
H. That street designation for present and future streets •
shall be as follows:
1. Boulevard_ Special East -West Streets to be named
SECTION 2 - PROCEDURE
A. It is the responsibility of the applicant for development
resulting in the construction of new streets to submit
names to the City for approval.
B. The City Planner or his designee shall approve all
street names in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. •
I I
Boulevards.
2. Streets
East -west streets to be named Streets.
3. Avenues
North -south streets to be named Avenues.
4. Road
Any diagonal street which does not conform
basically to grid to be known as Roads.
S. Drive
East -west streets parallel to, but
between names Streets, to be called Drives.
6. Place
North -south streets, paralled to, but
between named Avenues, to be called Places.
7. Way
Any irregular street which cannot conform
to any grid to be known as Wes.
8. Court
A cul -de -sac or dead -end street with
turn - around which cannot be reasonably
extended to carry the name of the preceding
street.
or •
A cul -de -sac which serves not more than
seven (7) lots shall carry the same name
as the street serving it.
9. Loop
A street which originates and terminates
on same common base street shall be designated
as a Loo (East -west or North - south)
street and named to indicate the same
common base street.
10. Frontage
Frontage roads shall carry the same name
Road
as the street or avenue served and shall
not be identified otherwise.
SECTION 2 - PROCEDURE
A. It is the responsibility of the applicant for development
resulting in the construction of new streets to submit
names to the City for approval.
B. The City Planner or his designee shall approve all
street names in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. •
I I
Ordinance No.
Page 3
• SECTION 3 - CHANGING OF STREET NAMES
A. The changing of street names may be initiated by any of
the following:
1. Public request which must be in writing to the City
Council stating the justification for such a change.
2. Resolution of Intention of the Planning Commission.
3. Resolution of Intention of the City Council.
B. If change is initiated through public request, the City
may require the applicant to pay all costs incurred by
the change (including, but not limited to street signs,
public hearing notification, etc.).
C. In all cases, it shall be the duty of the Planning Division,
to prepare a report discussing the justification for such
a change, recommending a replacement name and discussing
the impact of the proposed change.
SECTION 4 - STREET NAME CHANGE PROCESS
A. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall place the
• matter on the first available Planning Commission Agenda,
and shall submit the report to the Planning Division at
that time.
v
B. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on
the proposed street name change. Said public hearing
shall be noticed to all property owners on the street
proposed for change by mail ten (10) days prior to the
hearing, or by the posting of a notice along the street
at 300 foot intervals, ten (10) days prior to the hearing.
The Post Office, County Recorder, Fire District and
Sheriff's Department shall also be sent written notice
of the proposed change.
C. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, conditional
approval, or denial to the Council by Resolution pursuant
to the findings in Section 3 of this Resolution.
D. Upon receipt of the Commission's Resolution, the City
Clerk shall enter the matter on the next available
Council Agenda. The Council shall hold a public hearing.
Said hearing shall be noticed in the manner outlined
above.
l5
Ordinance No.
Page 4
E. Upon receiving testimony at the public hearing, the •
Council shall announce its decision on the proposed
street name change by Resolution. The Council may approve,
conditionally approve, or deny the street name change
pursuant to the findings in Section 5 of this Ordinance.
If approved, the Ordinance shall include the date upon
which said change will become effective. This decision
shall be final. Sixty (60) days prior to the effective
date of change, the City Clerk shall send written notice
of the change to the Post Office, County Recorder, Fire
District and Sheriff's Department.
SECTION 5 - FINDINGS
Street names may be changed pursuant to the following:
A. That the proposed change is consistent with the goals,
policies and standards of the General Plan,
B. That the proposed change is consistent with the adopted
Master Plan of Streets and Highways or adopted Circulation
Element.
C. That the proposed change will not cause significant
adverse impacts upon the environment.
D. That the proposed change is deemed necessary to protect •
the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and
general welfare.
SECTION 6 - SEVERABILITY
The invalidity of any word, section, clause, paragraph, sentence,
part of provisions of the Ordinance shall not affect the
validity of any other part of the Ordinance which can be given
effect without such invalid part or parts.
SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation, published inshed the City of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
Corrected Copy
ORDINANCE NO. 145
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
THE NEED FOR A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO FUNCTION
IN THE COMMUNITY.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows=
Section 1. Purpose. It is herebv found, determined and declared,
pursuant to Section 33101 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California,
that there is a need for the Redevelopment Agency created by Section 33100 of said
Code to function in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and said agency is authorized
to transact business and exercise its powers under the Community Redevelopment Law
of the State of California (Health and Safety Code 33000 etc. seq.).
Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 33200 of the
Health and Safety Code, the City Council hereby declares itself to be said agency,
and all the functions, rights, powers, duties, privileges and immunities vested by
the Community Redevelopment Law in said agency shall be, and they hereby are,
vested in the City Council.
• Section 3. The City Council hereby appoints the City Manager to
serve as Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency.
10
Section 4. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
ordinance to be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of
California, and the Clerk of the County of San Bernardino pursuant to Section 33102
of the Health and Safety Code.
Section 5. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (150 days after its passage
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, Calfiornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California,
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1981.
0
•
9
CITY OF RANQ -10 C LrAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL A
THE ROBERTS GROUP - A change of zone from R -1 -8,500 (Single
Family Residential ) to R -3 -PD (Multiple Family /Planned
Development) for the development of a planned development
consisting of 76 condominiums on 6.4 acres of land located
on the west side of Hermosa Street approximately 330 feet
north of 19th Street - APN 202 - 171 -20 b 38
RELATED FILE: Tentative Tract No. 11786
ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 22, 1981,
held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above- described
project. Upon completion of the hearing, the Planning Commission voted
4 to 0 to recommend approval of a change of zone from R -1 -8,500 to an
R -3 Planned Development designation. Please find attached a copy of
the Planning Commission Staff Report of April 22, 1981, which fully
describes the project. The project as proposed is consistent with
all related City Ordinances and the General Plan as the project is
planned for 11.9 units per acre which is consistent with the General
Plan designation of 4 -14 dwelling units per acre.
Also, please find attached a copy of a letter submitted to the Plan-
ning Commission in response to the public hearing notices that were
transmitted for the April 22, 1981, Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission conducted the public hearing and considered
all public comments relative to this development and approved the
Tentative Tract Map with the conditions, as attached, and recommended
approval of the Planned Development designation and the issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
Environmental Assessment /Planned Development 80 -14 •
City Council
May 20, 1981
Page Two
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City
Council approve Planned Development zone designation No. 80 -14 for the
above - described project through the adoption of the attached Ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
BARRY K. HOGAN
City Planner
BKH:MV:jr
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of April 22, 1981 •
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval
Letter of Opposition and Proposed Ordinance
11
CITY OF RAIN'CIiO CL'G. QNrA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 22, 1981 p
TO: Planning Commission ~
V
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND P.D. 80 -14 (TRACT 117811 -
THE ROBERTS GROUP - R total residential development of
76 condominiums on 6.4 acres of land in the proposed
R -3 P.D. zone, located on the west side of Hermosa
Avenue, approximately 330' north of 19th Street -
APN 202- 171 -29 and 38.
ABSTRACT: The applicants have been processing development plans and a
tract map for the above- described development in order to gain consideration
for approval by the Planning Commission. The approval of this project will
accomplish three things: a change of R -1 -8500 to R- 3 /P.D, approval of the
site plan and building design, and approval of the tentative tract map. The
project has been reviewed by both the Growth Management Review Committee and
the Design Review Committee and have successfully passed the point rating
system. Staff has prepared the detailed Staff Report with conditions of
approval for your review and consideration.
BACKGROUND: The applicants, The Roberts Group, Inc., are requesting
approval to develop 76 condominiums on 6.4 acres of land, located on the west
side of Hermosa Avenue, north of 19th Street (Exhibit "A "). This project is
north and adjacent to the project which was recently approved by the Planning
Commission that was submitted by the Roberts Group in August of 1980. The
proposal now before the Commission is the same style and character of
development which the Planning Commission previously approved. This review
is a planned development application which entails the review of the change
of zone from R -1 -8500 to R- 3 /P.D., the review and approval of the site plan
and architectural design of the buildings and the approval of a Tentative
Tract Map. Because of the several reviews combined with this process, two
Resolutions of Approval are provided for your consideration; a Resolution of
Approval for the Tentative Tract Map and a Resolution of Approval recommending
approval to the City Council of the Planned Development zone designation. The
site is presently undeveloped and contains minimum vegetation with some trees
existing along the Hermosa Avenue frontage. The Alta Loma drainage channel
traverses the southwest corners of the tract and the proposed Foothill Free-
way borders the north side of the tract.
ANALYSIS: The project is being developed in accordance with the State's
Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed change of zone is consistent with the General Plan as the
General Plan designates this area for residential uses at 4 -14 dwelling units
per acre. The project density is 11.9 units per acre.
/ w ITEM E
Staff Report
April 22, 1981
Page 2
As can be seen from the site plan shown in Exhibit "B ", the placement and
style of development is very similar to the first phase already approved by
the Planning Commission. As the Planning Commission will recall, one of the
major concerns regarding the first phase was the scale of the buildings and
proximity to the street frontay In this phase, the applicants have set
the buildings much farther back the street frontage to help allievate
this concern. Street sections and views are attached to this report and
larger drawings of this will be available for review at the Planning
Commission meeting. The structures are condominiums ranging from 3 units
per structure to 5 units per structure. All units contain a double car
enclosed garage. In addition, guest parking spaces are provided throughout
the development. Staff is recommending that the parallel guest parking
spaces be put into turf block to minimize the amount of paving throughout
the development. Texturized entry -ways and pedestrian crossing areas are
provided throughout the development.
r 1
U
Access to this development will be provided from 2 driveways along Hermosa
Avenue. A private interior vehicle circulation system is being provided
which meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The
preliminary grading and drainage plan has been reviewed by the Grading •
Committee and was conceptually approved. Drainage of this site will flow
to Hermosa Avenue. The City Engineer, has recommended that Hermosa Avenue
be designed as a major water carrying street which will require such things
as curb adjacent sidewalk, flash walls, rolled driveways, extended curb
heights.
Landscaping is being provided throughout the development in accordance with
standards and policies set by the Planning Commission. The project will be
required to provide the tree ratio set for multiple family developments and
additional features are recommended along Hermosa Avenue, such as mounding
and alluvial rock work. As the Commission will recall, concern was expressed
during review of the first development by the Roberts Group, that the
existing rock work seen in the street improvements be incorporated into the
project through appropriate landscape design, using low profile rock walls
integrated into the mounding and landscaping along the street frontage.
The existing trees along Hermosa Avenue will be required to be removed as
a result of street improvements. Some existing trees along the channel may
be able to be saved if they do not obstruct the channel improvements which
are required with this development. As always, a detailed landscaping and
irrigation plan will be required indicating all proposed planting material
and retention of existing plant material.
l J
/w
• Staff Report
April 22, 1981
Page 3
The Design Review Committee reviewed and rated this project finding it very
acceptable to the style and quality which is anticipated for this area. The
design of the units are the same as the design of the first phase which the
Commission previously reviewed. Detailed colored renderings and site plans
will be available at the Planning Commission meeting for your review.
Please find attached an expanded Initial Study completed by the applicant
which discusses various environmental factors relative to the project. Staff
has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation has
found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this development
based upon the Conditions of Approval recommended. Therefore, issuance of
a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the local newspaper as
a public hearing item and approximately 12 public hearing notices were mailed
to surrounding property owners. To date, no correspondence has been received
regarding this project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
• a pub is hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the
Commission concurs with findings of the Staff Report an adoption of the
attached Resolutions with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate.
JR ectful y u bmitted,
K Hoga
lanner
MDV:kp
is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Phasing Plan
Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "E" - Site Sections
Exhibit "F" - Street Elevations
Exhibit "G - I" - Building Elevations
Expanded Initial Study
Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 11181
Resolution of Approval for P.D. 80 -14
R1 -W-T
I V�rwur i
R' } R500 T
DA445
IVK/rvil
NIGHUND AYE.
R1-H500 -T
IV�UNIf
R -3
iw )
MSTING R -1
0
I�
'R1-850D -T - --
--- rvxaxri
/ •E %ISfING'R- }8500- -T
'PROPOSED R-3..
n n E%ISONG'R+0500 -T i
�( . • PROPOSED R-3
FM4T. ilWU1
f91� ST.
AYGNONE'fTE
0
wx
R -, 1
IV.ICAH! I
"Mom
A -P
(VIGW )
IFFY $�
InGxil
!tt
;S
s
a1
Y
S
nam urm usc.
SITE
- UTILIZATION
R4-1 NATURAL FEATURES
(HIDIT "A" 41
lie
NTT
ttlyi
ILU
2.
3.
hksdalo�n'
7�5 1,34 A�b
plan view
Hermosa Ave. elevation
section
F.oim
130:
3
i„
a9f O
�1r/i� IlUllll� I �� �1 � Inlll��'IIIfJI µ1I ��I11�II��II�IIN Il ryl
L'Ll�'
�+full���llmw: dui. i.
ri JV A
No!
F17
Illlllli
m'�IllU�ljl ��f }h��ul li �i �ji �, I�I'ilw nir tiln iUlu l.l�
IIIUIip r
} �.I�ullllluullullll0lli�lllllpi mNnmul(iiu
dl �0I ' ti
-
1�6d�9111111111Af.7QiI .............,t� I 111 �M�il 3pp�iul I'l.11 RII p II11�� /'
III Mill
im��milllli�l�l�-
fE
L�LLEDM. D 5;M&M
I i
DI�D�eG� G°gGpG°3
6L IEV
• • 0
}l
d)i o
B 0
0
° o
ou
a
Q
a
a
0
r <
r
r
r-
r
t
EXPANDED INITIAL STUDY
1
TENTATIVE TRACT 11781
THE ROBERTS GROUP, INC.
L
PRESENTED T0:
L
CITY OF.RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9320 BASELINE ROAD
LRANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
L
LSUBMITTED
BY:
ULTRASYSTEMS, INC.,
I
2400 MICHELSON DRIVE
L,
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92715
L
CONTACT PERSON: FRANKLYN R. ELFEND
LO
L
. 1101�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
j For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
L project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Meadow Brook 2 •
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
NAME, ADDRESS, TEI.F.•PHONE OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Toni Ouezada /The Roberts Grou
6210 Wilshire Boulevard. Suite 309. Los Anoeles. California 9
OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
if Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
None expected.
I -1
I l3
rCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
j • INITIAL STUDY
1
r PART I - PROJECT INMRMATIO14 SHEET - To be completed by applicant
l Environmental Assessment Review Fee: S80.00
' For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
r project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
C project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations- 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
Lby the applicant giving further information concerning
• the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Meadow Brook 2
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
The Roberts Group, Inc., 6210 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 309,
1 Los Angeles, California 90048 (213) 935 -9855
NAME, ADDRESS, TM.F.PHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Toni Quezada /The Roberts Group, Inc._
6210 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 309, Los Angeles, California 90048
Z M T -9z- 9 55
1, LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
West side of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue _
Assessor S_karcel No.202- 171 -29 8 202 -71 -38
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY 'ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
None expected.
0
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1.., Create a substantial change in ground •
contours?
_ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
See
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? Attachment'
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
' toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: "Yes" answers are
Ldiscussed in Attachment "A ".
LIMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
L residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishes
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
L information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
I_ additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the DaveI e
Review Committee. / /
l Date December 29, 1980 Signature
r n
Tile Associdt`- rector
ULTRASYSTEMS, INC.,
a 2400 Michelson Drive
Irvine, CA 92715 —
_ RESIDE17TIAL CONSTRUCTION
' '•T:ne following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and .Tentative Tract No.: The Roberts Group, Tentative Tract 117
Specific Location of Project: West side of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and
Highland Avenue, Assessor's parcel No. 202 -1 1- 9 .
S 202 -71 -38
PHASE Z PiiASE 2 PHASE 3 PRASE 4 TOTAL
'. N'umber of single _
family u-itr. N/A -- -- -- --
l
2.. Num: De= of nu' -tiple
Lfamily units: 33 26 17 76
Late proposed to
begin exstraction: 2/1/82 5/1/82 •' 8/1/82 -- --
L. Earliest date of 8/1/82 11/1182 2/1/83 --
occ_;
and = of Tentative
L. Eecrcocs Pr'_ce Rance
L1 -2 Bdrm's $97,990 7 6 6 -- 19
2 -1 Bdrm's /Den $94,990 1.1 9 5 -- 25
L�
L3 -2 Rdrm's /Den $79,990 7 5 4 - 16
4 -1 Bdrm's /Den $75,990 4 3 1 -- 8
l
en $72,990 4 3 1 -- 8
L ,
Ir
1r. Ovirm.
1 •
ATTACHMENT A
SUPPLEMENT TO INITIAL STUDY
•
L
L
l •
117
1.0 INTRODUCTION
At the request of the Roberts Group, Inc., Ultrasystems, Inc., has
prepared this expanded Initial Study on the proposed development of a 6.38
_ acre parcel of vacant land located west of Hermosa Avenue, north of 19th
Street and south of Highland Avenue in The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calif-
ornia, as shown in Figure 1.
This expanded Initial Study was prepared in order to allow the.
City of Rancho Cucamonga to identify environmental impacts, facilitate
environmental assessment early in the design of the project, and to provide
documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a negative declaration
that a project will not have a significant effect an the environment and
thereby eliminate unnecessary EIR's.'
The scope of work requirement for the preparation of this expanded
Initial Study was established by Mr. Mike Vairin of-the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Department.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
LThe proposed project involves the development of 76 condominium
units on 6.38 acres of land located west of Hermosa Avenue, north of 19th
Street and south of Highland Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calif-
ornia, as shown in Figure 2. The condominium development will be comprised
Lof 35 two - bedroom units and 41 one- bedroom plus den units. Access to the
site is proposed at two locations from Hermosa Avenue.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
L As discussed above, the purpose of this expanded Initial Study is
to provide the necessary environmental documentation to permit the City of
Rancho Cucamonga to Prepare a negative declaration for this project. In
order to meet this objective, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Depart-
ment provided Ultrasystems Inc. with the environmental concerns associated
• State E1R Guidelines, Section 15060(b).
i
r
I
1 i 1
rnllSKK p / I r�I yam^ I �'
I r I f I rllgl� 1:
----------
1 Yom•
}____z.t
_ } II L r �i
�.I 2 I wuw +gip rw �:;y __ _ __ _ ______TI_
I ; __a EMON m 'r:r�: AV Sttt li I I 1
11 a S 3 /PROPOS�'/ ;R" " '
y! ITE +NIGNLANp' �A�L�i����i
__ }' _S_i __ - _ ___ 4 1 I _________ -_ M_i _________i 1 I
__19TH r "n
a-ALTA L 0 M i W!
u
,
I '
•�.al.a [r I I F I 1 Er
.r
I _}
I Ir rl _ I 1 I �nld
rl I I I I
_ o [: 1
R. n
pJ1 9b
w a
r "
° u.e ' FOOTHILL
P.ne. eL
I
s
I SCALE: 1 inch = 1/2 mile
Source: Title:
THOMAS BROTHERS - -.._ VICINITY MAP
l �
� -z
1
00
lLEGEND
I1 0 GRASSLAND
BLUE GUM EUCALYPTUS
I • CALIFORNIA WALNUT
* AGAVE
REDBERRY
hoc
.f
I
0
I
,I
E
�• Gif �
BFI
I
ULTRASYSTEMS, INC. I VEGETATION MAP 14
�hh T
'rte'
r (
.
The proposed project is consistent with the existing City of Rancho •
Cucamonga General Plan which designates the property as a Mixed Use area and
is interpreted to permit high - density residential development (15 -30 dwelling
units /acre) and office professional uses.*
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently in the process or revising
their General Plan. This revised plan would designate the subject property
as Medium - Density Residential, 5 -14 dwelling units /acre. The City of Rancho
l� Cucamonga Planning Department has indicated that the proposed development
l of 76 condominium units on the 6.38 acre project site (11.9 dwelling units/
(' acre) is consistent with the existing and proposed General Plan designations. **
The project site is currently zoned R -1 -8500 (single - family resi-
dential). Implementation of the proposed project would require a zone change
from R -1 -8500 to R -3 (multiple family residential, 5 -14 D.U. /acre). * **
Biology
A preliminary biological survey of the 6.38 acre project site was
lconducted by a staff biologist on December 17, 1980. A generalized vegetation
map, shown as Figure 4, indicates the type and location of dominant plant •
Lspecies present on the site.
Past agricultural practices has resulted in the removal of native
vegetation and has allowed the introduction of broadleaved weeds and grasses.
The principal weedy species include Telegraph Weed (Hetherotheca grandiflora),
rField Mustard (Brassica rapa), Jointed Charlock (Raphinus raphinistrum),
Russian Thistle (Salsola iberica), and Sweet - Clover (Melilotus indicus).
Introduced grasses include Winter Grass (Poa annua), Oats (Avena spp.), and
Foxtail (Hordeum spp.). Collectively, these weedy plant species cover
t' approximately 75 percent of the site and represent the major vegetative
type covering the property.
* Mike Vairin, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, telephone
lconversation of December 10, 1980.
"* Ibid.
ws.w Ibid. •
q
r
There are a few native shrubs and su bshru bs that are present on
• the site. Typical shrubs include Horehound (Marrubium vulgare), Yerba Santa
(Eriodictyon trichocalyx), California Buckwheat (Eriogonium fasiculatum)
and Redberry (Rhamnus crocea). These shrubs are widely scattered and con -
C stitute less than two percent of the total ground cover.
Six Blue Gum (Eucalyptus globulus) trees are planted along Hermosa
Avenue. They represent remnants of a larger windrow that protected vineyards
9 that existed several years ago. The only native tree is a California Walnut
f'tree (Juglans californica) that is present in the southeast corner of the
site.
'. The project site provides a low- quality habitat for few wildlife
species. The most abundant wildlife present on the site are birds. Resident
bird species includes the Common Crow, Western Meadowlard, Mourning Dove and
Song Sparrow. The only mammals present on the site are the Butte Pocket
Gophers, Audubon Cottontails, Ground Squirrels and undoubtedly, several
species of mice and rats. Larger mammals are non - existent.. The open grass-
y land may support a variety of reptile species, but due to the late
1.. seasonal cold temperatures, none were observed.
1 Cultural Resources
An archaeological field reconnaissance of the project site was
fconducted by Archaeological Associates, under the direction of Dr. David
Van Horn on December 19, 1980. The surveyors traversed the parcel in 10
Lmeter parallel transacts carefully examining the ground for archaeological
material. Surface visibility was generally poor over the tract due to dense
grass coverage. However, visibility was improved in the dirt road which
transacts the tract from east to west.
rThe results of the field work were entirely negative; no signifi-
cant cultural resources of any kind were observed on the parcel. Modern
disturbance to the parcel includes extensive discing and trash dumping as
well as installation of the masonry flood control channel. Piles.of broken
wood and cinder blocks suggested that a structure was once situated on the
I- parcel but has recently been demolished.
`� ( h Y
CTraffic /Circulation
IAccess to the site is to be from Hermosa Avenue, north of Nineteenth
Street. Hermosa is an existing north /south arterial and is a two -land roadway.
Based on traffic counts obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Hermosa
currently carries 1,500 vehicles daily adjacent to the ;ite and 2,100 vehicles
1 daily south of Nineteenth Street. Highland Avenue is an existing east /west
arterial located north of the site. Highland Avenue is presently a two -lane
(a roadway in the vicinity of Hermosa Avenue with some localized widening due to
l adjacent development. Highland Avenue currently carries 1,300 vehicles on an
average day in the vicinity of Hermosa Avenue. Nineteenth Street is an east/
west arterial located south of the site, and although operating as a two -lane
road it is fully improved with curbs and gutters on the south side west of
Hermosa Avenue. Nineteenth Street currently carries 4,500 vehicles daily west
of Hermosa Avenue and 4,800 vehicles daily east of Hermosa Avenue. The inter-
sections of Hermosa Avenue and Highland Avenue and Hermosa Avenue and Nineteenth
Street are both presently controlled by four -way stop signs and have restricted
site visibility at the intersections: Based on average daily traffic volumes
and evening traffic counts performed by Kunzman Associates, all of the existing •
roadways and intersections in the vicinity of the site are currently operating
at a free flow Level of Service A condition.
The proposed 76 single - family detached dwelling units for the project
are projected to generate 760 vehicle trips on an average day. To address the
cumulative impact of the development of the project and the development of the
adjacent parcel (Tract 11625), average daily traffic and morning and evening peak
II hour traffic generation are shown in Table 1. Implementation of the City -wide
t_ goals of increasing ride sharing and transit use will result in an additional
reduction, in traffic generation for the sites.
L For the assumed distribution of the project traffic and adjacent
development project traffic, traffic volumes on Hermosa Avenue are projected
l_ to increase to 2,200 vehicles daily adjacent to the site and 2,900 vehicles
daily south of Nineteenth Street. Traffic volumes on Nineteen Street are
projected to increase to 5,100 vehicles daily east and west of Hermosa
Avenue, and 1,400 vehicles daily on Highland Avenue. For future traffic •
i
g
`- 1�5
'•�m'n3�Ye,�ns
with this project. The areas identified by the City requiring evaluation
• were as follows: Landforr Alteration, Land Use, Biology, Cultural Resources,
Traffic, Noise, Public Services (Fire and Police only) and Hydrology. These
areas are discussed below:
1 Landform Alteration
The topography of the site is relatively level and can be developed
with a minimal amount of alternation to the natural terrain. The existing
,.s elevations on the site vary from 1500 feet ASL on the northwest portion of
I he property to 1474 feet ASL in the southeast.
The proposed grading plan for the development of the project site
is shown in Figure 3. The plan indicates approximately 10,000 cubic. yards
of earth movement. Grading impacts associated with the development of the
property would include minor alternation of the existing topography and
the subsequent loss of some open space.
ILand Use
The present land use of the project site consists of vacant land
`- • and a San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel which traverses both the
L northwest and southeast portions of the property. Overall land uses in the
project vicinity include single family residences. a horse ranch and vacant
I land.. The land immediately north of the project site along Highland Avenue
includes a single family residence and associated vacant land. The area
north of Highland Avenue is comprised of single family residences currently
tunder construction. The property to the east of the site includes single
family residences and a horse stable. The land to the south and west is
currently vacant, however, the property immediately south of the site is
proposed for the Meadow Brook Residential Development. There is a neigh -
borhood commercial center on the northeast corner of 19th Street and
Archibald Avenue, approximately 1/2 mile from the project .site.
LThe development of the proposed project would result in the conver-
sion of the site from vacant land to an urban residential land use. The
L proposed project is compatible with the existing residential land uses
north and east of the site, and with the proposed residential development
located south of the site.
c
. conditions reflecting full development of the project site and the adjacent
project parcel, all roadways in the vicinity of the site will continue to
operate at a free flowing Level of Service A for the existing two -land roadways*
The intersections of Hermosa Avenue and Nineteenth Street, and Hermosa Avenue
and Highland Avenue will also continue to operate at a Level of Service A in
the evening peak hour with the existing four -way stop signs. Localized road-
way widening adjacent to the project and the adjacent project site, will
further improve traffic operations and safety in the vicinity of the sites.
TABLE 1
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Land Use
Mornin
Peak Hour
Evening
Peak Hour
Daily
Inbound
Outbound
Inbound
Outbound
2 -Way
Trip Generation Rates
,
Single - Family Attached
0.3 /Unit
0.6/Unit
0.7 /Unit 0.3 /Unit
10 /Unit
Dwelling Units
Trios Generated
Project (76 dwellings)
25
45
55
25
760
Adjacent Project -
30
60
70
30
1,010
Tract 11625 (101 dwellings)
Cumulative Total
55
105
125
55
1,770
Noise
The proposed residential project would not be adversely effected
by noise unless the proposed Foothill Freeway (Route 210) is constructed.
This freeway is proposed adjacent to the northern boundary of the project
site. Future project residents may be impacted by construction noise result-
ing from grading and development of the freeway right -of -way. The primary
noise impact from freeway construction activities would be annoyance to
project residents during daytime hours.
V7 7
J
E
r
�.:
The proposed Foothill Freeway (if and when constructed by the
California Department of Transportation) would be required to incorporate a
traffic noise attenuation design. The attenuation design, i.e. noise barrier,
would reduce freeway traffic noise in adjacent residential areas to accept-
able noise levels. Consequently, no adverse freeway traffic noise impacts are
I
anticipated.
1
Vehicle traffic and related traffic noise from Hermosa Avenue will
be nominal as indicated in Table 2. No adverse noise impacts are anticipated
'
from the local traffic. .
TABLE 2
ESTIMATE OF LOCAL TRAFFIC NOISE*
DISTANCE (IN FEET) FROM CENTERLINE
E
OF ROADWAY TO NOISE LEVEL VALUE
Hermosa Avenue (Ldn)
60 dB 65 dB 70 dB
Projected ADT = 1,500 ** 25 ft. NA NA
•
Traffic generated by the project would not substantially increase
Llocal
traffic noise levels or result in adverse noise impacts to the local
community.
IThe
proposed multi - family residential project must comply with
Title 25 (California Noise Insulation standards) which specify design
Lcriteria
to limit the transmission of noise between individual dwelling units.
Sound transmission control between dwelling units can be achieved by incor-
porating the applicable STC (sound transmission class) and IIC (impact insula-
tion class) rated wall and floor /ceiling assemblies. The project architect
L
or engineer should reference the catalog of STC and IIC ratings for wall
and floor /ceiling assemblies published by the State of California -in order
Lto
utilize the most cost effective design. - **
* FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model -RD -77 -108, Methodology.
L
** Based on current traffic count data, City of Rancho Cucamomga.
* *' This document can be obtained from the Office of Noise Control, California
Department of Health Service, 2151 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, California 94704
LAttention:
Mr. Russell Dupree.
I�
r
Hydrolcoy*
The natural drainage of the property and site vicinity occurs by means
of Hermosa Avenue, by sheet flow over the northerly site boundary and by
the existing San Bernardino County Flood Control District Channel. Hermosa
Avenue picks up approximately 35 acres of tributary drainage upon reaching
the northerly boundary of the site. This flow is presently carried as street
flow until it reaches the point where street and channel flows converge and
drain south on Hermosa Avenue. An additional 35 acres of off -site drainage
enter the site as sheet flow and when joined by approximately six acres
of on -site drainage is directed to Hermosa Avenue along the northerly side
of the flood control channel. The flood control channel serves as an over-
` flow facility for the Alta Loma Basin.
Due to the project site's location one mile south of the base
of the San Gabriel Mountains, a network of debris basins direct storm flows
from the mountains to the channels. In many cases, streets serve as surface
l drainage corridors. Hermosa Avenue is an example of a street currently
carrying storm flows. Consequently,-flooding and disruption of traffic
�- are significant problems at the intersection of Hermosa and 19th Street; •
approximately 375 feet south of the project site.
The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Flood
insurance Map indicates that the site lies in a narrow strip designated
"AO" for shallow flooding depths up to one foot.
LA Master Plan of Drainage for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is
under preparation, but is not yet approved or available for use.
LThe proposed development would alter the natural sheet flow drainage
of the site as a result of grading, establishment of streets and construction
of buildings. The diversion of sheet flows along the northern boundary of
the site will shift the confluence point of the sheet overflow area from
Lthe southeasterly portion of the site to the northeasterly portion along
Hermosa Avenue.
-I- ' James E. Crosby Engineers, Inc.
•
•�V
1 Y
I✓
1
L
` .J The amount of runoff on the site will increase proportionally to
the increase in impervious surfaces constructed on the site. The increase
in impervious surfaces will increase flows from the site by approximately
60 %, however, this additional runoff is relatively insignificant when
compared to large off -site flows reaching this site.
1 •
L
�t
l
I�
l •
L
L
L
L
L
In order to mitigate the impacts on drainage created by the
proposed project, the applicant should incorporate the following measures;
--A proposed new street design for Hermosa Avenue to contain storm
flow capacities up to and including the 100 -year flood with overflow con-
fined to the street right -of -way. The 10 -year flood storm flows would be
contained on Hermosa Avenue between street curbs. The half- section of
Hermosa Avenue would be increased from 12 feet to 32 feet.
-- The San Bernardino County Flood Control District Channel would
be upgraded to provide 100 -year flood protection to mitigate flooding on
adjacent land. The solution proposed to mitigate this problem by Tentative
Tract 11625, immediately adjacent to the channel on the south, is construc-
tion of an 18 foot -wide by eight foot deep rectangular concrete channel.
- Site grading would be performed to sufficiently elevate building
pads from inundation during a 100 -year flood. Positive drainage slopes
slanting away from all buildings would be created by grading and lancscap-
ing techniques.
- All drainage courses would be adequately protected from erosion
by grading and landscaping techniques.
Public Utilities
Fire Protection
The Foothill Fire District does not anticipate the need for
additional personnel or equipment as a result of the proposed project.
However, additional development in the project area could have a cumulative
effect on the Fire District.*
Captain Longo, Foothill Fire District, telephone conversation, December 11,
1980.
L
1 �l
steins
(
[
C'
t
l
L
L
L
Police
No special law enforcement problems are expected to occur relative
to the project, but an increase in crime commensurate with the increased
population would result.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department recommends that
the project proponents consult with the Sheriff's Department to discuss the
possible impacts and mitigation measures.*
* Lieutenant O'Rourke, City of Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department,
telephone conversation, December 12, 1980.
L'.
)3(
•
•
r1
LJ
0
GC
a.�x aw a �I�irC 9C C/Ul:'Oiif.�
l �� CmWM!".. i.C4C GFF:i c iii
6655 c�{evno�acc., �{(fa .`onuy ea. 91701 DEPT.
April 16, 1981 iqk)
3
Planning Division
Rancho Cucamonga
California 91730
Dear Sire:
In response to your letter of
April 10, 1981, regarding P. D. No.
80 -14 - the Roberto Group, and the
proposed R -3 zone to permit the building
of 76 condominiums on 6.42 acres,
• approximately 350 feet north of Nineteenth
Street on the west side of Hermosa Avenue.
C J
Such a zone change would greatly
Increase the problems of narrow streets
and traffic density.
This Swale land has a dangerous
flooding condition and has, in fact, a
flood channel traversing the property.
The Poothill Freeway right away
Is north and adjacent to this land.
Desirable residents are already
leaving the community because of over -
crowdig and the lose of the rural atmosphere.
Tours sincerely,
)3z
Y
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -41
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING •
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
NO. 80 -14 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM
R -1 -8500 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR 6.4 ACRES LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF 19TH STREET -
APN 202 - 181 -20 and 33.
WHEREAS, on the 31st day of Decamber, 1981, an application was
filed and accepted on the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of April, 1981, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The "ancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following findings:
That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted
in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding area;
2. The proposed zone change would not have significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties;
and
3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the •
existing and proposed General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the
environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on April
22, 1981.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California
Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
22nd day of April, 3981, Planned Development No. 80 -14.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -14.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall
be forwarded to the City Council.
4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract
Map No. 11781 shall apply to this development.
E
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -42
• A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMbti55ION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 11781 (P.D. 80 -14).
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11781, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by The Roberts Group, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of
subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 6.4 acres of
land located on the west side of Hermosa, north of 19th, consisting of
76 dwelling units, and being divided into 1 lot, regularly came before
the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on April 22, 1981;
and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
• SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11781 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
)3(l
Page 2 r
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. .
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11781, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Low profile rock walls shall be incorporated into the
landscape design along Hermosa Avenue.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
2. Design and installation of imp "oved channel for Alta Loma
Channel from westernmost tract boundary to Hermosa Avenue
w'th adequate inlet and outlet control shall be required
p-r San Bernardino County Flood District's standards and
specifications. The construction cost of the channel
shall be credited to the storm drain fees for the project,
and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per City
Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the
amount of these fees.
3. Structural adequacy of the existing wall located easterly
of Hermosa Avenue across the channel outlet shall be
investigated and necessary reconstruction of the wall if •
required, shall be done to the satisfaction of the Flood
Control District.
4. All required on -site and off -site right -of -way for the
channel shall be dedicated in fee to the Flood Control
District.
5. A lot line adjustment to redefine tract boundary between
tentative tracts 11781 and 11625 along the channel right -
of -way shall be completed prior to recordation of the
final map.
6. The portion of the proposed State Highway 30 corridor at
the northwest corner as shown on the tentative tract
shall have a lot designation as determined by the City
Engineer.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Richard Dahl, Chairman •
• project u.. T%2 // • .i
CE : :.A pa!d OE CG':'v!IIIY oE'IEIOrk:Rli
St :A] (0'.01110A5
subjra:
/A:u
PG go- t�_1 tt_11101)
12.
All bnln9
_ _
_r
s. pools Into ll ed a[ the time a2 Im all eevelnp.rnt sntll. I,r
drat l:[an
mil-/} G (0o -
t:
Solar luv o•e.
loC a Sian:
—Ono
—`c
l�Iv I_—
`,I y� _ ^^ ^' 1� }1 GT
L)_Q
y_ II.
Ieatur i : :J p¢urst. an pIIMJYt Icla i tir,i.NtIan .,Islas Shall it
— Yl ..IlE [l�'l 1l
_r w O—L_ ISl._ i C
Inrmi unit the [laves -prondt'J
L *ens to connttt ereilln;s
with o:m saws aria
"I'lat:onai u .2 t.
[nO 3e z[Pmz
a... k., are :anJ: [•unS Ot aYV ra ra 1.
va
�
11!.ttt CfI.IACi LIE PI ?_IO OIV"I 101lh9L1AhCE YIIN 41E
_1/ 11.
All trash pick up shall be for Indle,d :pal unit, with III ..Ceptr[als z,10dod
mans sew.
CCUDITAhe
COAOIi10'!S: 11111I90
public v
i. Site Dim
l_Z °t
�15.
Standard call. Cover plans shall he supnittrd [a add appruv¢tl by the City
Plame.
a.,J D.il Cin9 Official prior to occupancy or the fors[ unit.
�.
Site shall he developed in i wrdance rltb the .,proved Site plans oa file
m ee :.annmg
�6.
All buildings niters and Individual -its
1-1adu mar ill mnaltmn, InIolnee herein,
mi[1 Shall be identified hi a al ur
and concise man air, Including
2.
Pu,ltea Site plans and buildings IdCor.drating all Conditions of
1/.I.
proper 11 lamination.
Solid
rrlevJtipnS
m.
vJ uall b .oiled [h a p4rnm9 OMSIpn prior to I...an :e of
to
Corp exterior doors, security dead bolls and lo<kz still be in z[a li Pd
Y
Caiid lnl "niPe
n pa eb unit
o p 1
[Ills r0 KL
✓l.
A11--al or this repuesal sop Iii not .Pile
iity MVI all sections or
_�10.
Security devices Such as window lacks shall be installed on each unit.
Zara rig iple
anJ all mnrr aVPllcaae Cfry Ordinances In erlact a[
_ ✓19.
All units "th" this develo
t,- 1,111 Pea
[re at Caa Ji ny pv,rrn[ nsu ircr.
solar later heating unit, pment shall be preplumbea to be a0a ptetl yor a
t.
The di- clop .r Wall provlilt all lot, Pith adequate iideyard area for Pecrae[lon
ooa20.
Fnergy con swing building ma terials
+e^Ic,n vt nr.11e .:stem[ to City Standards.
and aPpilanw5 a
Incorp "i Gd into this re required to be
[o Sne1
reduced [ project uJ¢ such things as but oat Ilmiled to
5.
Irate recpstaCie areas shall be trial ... it by A 6 Fact high masonry was; with
,,ad,. grin¢ insulation dovblx pa n[V
wind-•, eltended
_
vi �., alstmcc:n, gates our vuant to City Standards. Location shall be
overfauj,. pllotlessef
es
J appliances, etc.
1
l✓
,upl[ct to a;e,oml by me Planning Civision.
-li
This develepuent skill Provide am option to hemp buyer. t0 WIN'. A
6.
t
A ,a+ple -f [he real ma dni2
t trial ,hall be sued to the Planning of vision
water heati .nil. solar
ng
lJ
lur renew and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
_ 22.
Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to C e sl tlafac [IOW
of the Foothill F1::
At pool arpurtenances, inclVding air cordili.ner5, shall be architecturally
ProtKUOn District.
Shirld rl Isom vlen aM the sounn buffered fr,m adjacent Properties
23.
Local and NPS ter Planned equestrian 1•.115
anI llr, -lt a, "'P1`1 by Ire planning and Building Divisions.
Shall be p r`d.11t, We
tract 1. aclordan[e with [IR E
n
S,,trian Troll plan. p detailed goes b'l an r,
troll Plan indicating w:d:bt, maximum
Prior to my use of "I project Sit' .r business ictlesty being (mmenree
•lapel, b Y$ICal Conditions, fencing
yid orris control, In a¢orJa rice
t1— cn, all ['n :liunnC .I aVVr.vIT contained herein shall be <wlV le Seri to
With Ci[ 2
be snimu tt eA to anU Y gilts Sri an ball s[anJa r.lt. shP it
thl "Olfaction Of the U :rotor of Cb'uanrty Develpmarnt.
by the City Planner prior [b aVOmval
fe(.rdati
-n Of lL¢ Ilnal•map
map.
_ 9.
This iii ... vat L:ell nee null and void If Cuildin9 permits are not Issued
24.
This tract shall farm
per mss project -1--h 'ear year Iron the data bl project approval.
_
or ernes to t mintenance district for maintrna... Of
eq.¢,tIlan tra as.
ID.
As Conditional ate Permit, this Project shall Peter. null and void In
25.
street n S shall be 1111.
101,,. (lot Imuth; from date of app,.val, unless permit, ors issued car
_
to and ...roved by the City Pia naer. in aanreen :p
with M¢a ndnP[Pd 5t veto Nero ing policy
use Jpin.ird ii comps ve cot eJ.
pr l.r [o approval ,mJ
the Ihml aqV. re(OrJJ [inn of
A ar[a 1 ire 119ntmg 11
Pon seal he submi tied to and approved by the Pi arming
Division
_ 26.
If this develoinent Intends to re Strltt lPn
prior to rs uanc• of hmlCmq rernit.. Such plan sirall indicate
equci [r or animal related -z rs
to 'I."Iric lots b r pr.blhR nitro
..Y le il:r, oat uv,,tl n[n au n, h.,ghl and method Of Sh Irldmg. Ira Ii.pti n9
en Lire sCi men a <nyY d the C.C. A P.',
mutt be wlmit[ ed L. aria
sealI a.n rrn ly .l llr._t P -Iris nt pmp„rti rs.
rev aired pY me City Pl don or I., l., to
1IneI Pupa arPrrl.nl at
P'.,'t No.
_ D. 711S al"b" :call pr vw. pfrc en[ of offer Ile housing esdior
anew wI,, Gc n al Plan Dou r, pnlfu ft "d Um Inset 're,
e 1 s C
t I. ass in -din t1 . u..tn tt, na g..,fnl It�nli nonce Affurdal., I Ity sr., II
tf ot ter .c.l ey c .nt n rt calls. rents A d I, elan 1 e 1,.114 at
u,e ant of c u]u,n ar Ir car o)tc t. asrer,en[ In wen ''all be
al ,--d by Lhet City Plaster prior to iiteance or Wilding Vf,mltS.
Pori el 6 \'r w•_ular Access
.11 Ivry in, Iat Iandsu Vra xI, ndt ii,a 11 have min: outs l de dimension
or S and snail coo Lem .m 10" walk adjacent in Va,sicg stall.
_ ✓2. Parsing lot trees shall Le a minimum 15 gallon size.
3. All t,.o -way ante widths Shall bx a minimum of 15 feet wide.
�a. Emergency access xha I be provided, maintenance free and dear, a minimm,
of 3] ft•-t wide at all t re, duein, cons that t i an In accordance with Tooth 111
fire g,i[r,C[ rc,lu,rtnPnt i.
All parking spaces shall be double strl,ed.
_ ✓6. All ..,Is shall Le provided with automatic garage door openers.
_Vol",. MvgnatN visitor parking ai eas shall be turf blocked.
_y/B. the Cn,enan[S. CdJPS and Restrictions shall restrict the Storage or recreational
vehicles on Us, site unless they are the principle source of transpotation
5 9. nP n
to , nq s all to permitted with the Interior clrulatlon aisle other than
V� 1n ns iq,nef viii or pa rk mq arrant Covenants. Cade%, and Restrictions
i,all le iI vclo,edl by the applicant And I.b.1.11ed to the City Planning
O ivislon prior to Issuance of Wilding permits.
tannyap,n,l
�. A del. ofd lendscaPo and irrigation plan shall be Submitted to and approved
by 'no Plain a ng 0, vision prior to lip is seance of building permits.
_ ✓z F,n LSn, trees sbsli be retained whir „er passible. A master plan of
I—, t ,nil their prrcl :e location. site and tyre snail b-
ni"I'v: I.y ter develop”. gain plan shall lake IALD a :,nt me proposed
graow,,. hat trees aye to be retained, lnm,icg metLOdiC and .1c,e n
lrfr5 .,n he rl a., bad for 'velacrnent of r ra,ld ides. The plan 1S .,mileod
n of x1b 11,d In and a,pro,fd by the Planning Division prior Lo approval
of the final grader, PTom.
V 1 Stn et trees, a -n a mum of 15 gallon size or larger• shall be installed In
ly-[^ rrtn Ih, rose, Plan or Street trees far In, City of Panc Ln
C RalPtnga and seat Ce spooled it a rage of every 30' on Interior
Street, 'cad E0' on ulen or mtrmets. a
V 'I. A m of 50 trees yor gro - P,iteL of tM !oll—i.y
'lull bemrmvf :LJ wtlan lne JereloV �cn l: N : -31• Lot or la r9 -r, 19• -IS
gall.,, and 101 -5 lion.
_ ✓5. All lane,.! .l areas Shall he maintained In a healthy and lhrevl„g cund,tlah,
Ire, Iron .C+A', leash, and deLns.
6. All slope W„1' In excess oi
of five IS, Iret in ertical hlht ;,,.I of 5:1 or
greater Slope Shall to lanJtca PtA and it d.trd so o,Jm.e hit, tl n.e
planting ie,tuteemints of the City of 4.I acho Cu [a'nn ^+� S -is tI.., DI+ntInQ
11,111 Incline tut net be limited to ,uotrd qv pId cover and a.peo me
ices a J Lrrc'. All oven planting and III 'It.ot ',hill Ce [o•dinuao'ly by
lamed rtv
a health, and [ninq m n .d.ti Dy be Jeve lope. n +t,I each
inIndividual unit I' sold and o<copi e.l by Ib, DvYCr. Prior to rel.ts1 :l F
occupancy for Lhosa unit', an iirspection of its sitters 'hall be ec,pleted
by the Plannuq Staff to deternme [LSL iL i, m sati'faclory mnJ rtivn.
_Z7. All porke,,, open areas, and landuak+ng shall be fully .,,.lemon by A
homenwnpfs assecla Lion of other weirs acceptable to the Cil /. Sc :h prof(
of maintenance shall be 'uhnitted to :he City prior to Issuance of building
permits.
8. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate Irrigation system, Shall be
installed by the developer In adr,rdarce with 'uleitted plans.
_Zg. The ! ) nal dn ra
l9a of the perimeter parlways, j Is. landsu u
ping and sidelks
shall Le incivaea in the required lanocape plans and shall be subject to
approval by the planning Division.
IQ. Amin limns or i of he trees blasted within the prof e[t, shall be
specimen side trees.
✓ 11. Spec, al la coif ape Ira to ruz so ch a . d,no, 11a iv, al met, zlmugn, ylte
trees, I'vend"Iry SiJPwalks (hothanti sal pq�1,ml:onell change) and
intensified landl,arlog, is required a lag
D_ Si dos
x1
My signs P'b,,eA for Sign develafm,nt man be designed .. Dare, m+nce /
by t the cii.l., fn a Sign Ora in and shall regni are approval
by the rl and tag DIV�SIOn prior [oaln't.l a[Inn of Sash S'1,In 5`w
_ t. A unllnmm Sinn program for this poelori,ot shall be submtted to the
Pleddie, Division for the,r renew and at,oval prior to is<pana of
Building permits.
3. The Signs Icd Ic,trl on the si,dnit Led plan, are not Itoroved with this
approval and rill require separate sign ren,w and irproval.
E. Additional Apprnva is Reg fired
1. Dveflnr Review shall be aecanplished prior to the IS]mn[e of A Building
perm t.
0 1 2 0
Project no.
_ 2. rr« : :i, Pcvrr. anall Le ace u+.pl gals ed prior to recordation of the final
lu :dli.loh ^Ip.
W'3 - Approval of lent ,tive Tract Ldtp7ae IS granted SpLJeCt to the approml
of and /or ;e L.e /Canal ti on al use renatt bid.
_ e. ran C, -rib .cull USle Per:,:: is gran l,J for a period of :mntn(s) It
wn Kn "', [fie Nino mg co +m....I Fide add or delete cpndllriu or rerake
the Conditional USe permlt.
_ S. i:, Jere lore. I - :ed [ obtain tna' I.I ...... .Jr." Statenen[ ,y
pli rc na l ?rl If ulna ei •w n hale a private er Faille e.r .estrlan trall On p/
adjaC• t to their proyerty.
In p.rohll.oq the rune located no Lot Tract _
1 nave r,,E [the C.C. b IL s and
n aW n8- s said Lot a subject to A rwtoal rerlpr.i.1
lot for [ ec:.r pone o aITnwing equestrian traffic to
9a�naeees..
S".,d
v ClIl
Said 11a 1 e [ Is to be filed by the developer with he City prior to
Prior to approval and iecorextion of [he final nap. or prior to issuance of
Lui1J mll5 ullly up i vnlvrd,
ri t[cn [ii(ir
o-, n11 eneae.i iCooloni: r2E:.o, an Le m4uittel to to. DrNrhnenl Of
G tan t evelrrrrnt 1 Fels "It" that deco..[¢ "'hour facilities a ul
.ell be t+ {Dole of a r :r- ndabnq students 9en ra tad Ly Iris pl.,,Il. re5ucn
v'l lel[rr of clrt+l¢atm::. :ust Lave hr ea issued c by cost sc!"I Oist rice vilhin
'V t!•er (5•J1 dart prior to it,, hwl map approval in the case of the
I r4J..idols pup .1 issuance of pernii es in the due of all other residential
/ projects.
✓ ' rr lnLu r to apPrnvnl and r mtlinn u of the final rats, or prior to the Issuance
of IIit mg prnvti a mop 11 involved• viii Ren fertific.tlon tram The
aftrC.e! vile, pis :rist.' Unt ateawte ;inn r and eater facilities e r
nun [ dills Sl.• r or p aed project. sills It sea. :nllmr to the
Lgmr t'enf .r U:, .us;y cr.rl.LV.n'l. Soon letter lh.tt nave beer, Bard by
�bl . Nr a „V ICI rNOn silty (6n) ear, prior to final eap approval in
1
fir1.11 l.1l'ou, or Ix lnnre oI "'.1” l ,n tit case of all .111", r
S,lrnllal 11"". for Dro!.... ,n, .....I [ant ftCll i[irs all.vaLle
by Re Lon Ail .......I '•:titer Con col pnard and the Clty, lur,tt,u
ert,t¢atmn of a c�pl,o,llty. Inclining all supportive information• snail
be onta,nel aiuJ 5li nl,111d TO Or City.
✓9. Tills auroral ,.all teen*¢ null and vole If the tentative snnnlvision map
is p,, a,, rl and r 'd „i or In, ll rang rree,t, itsllaa earn fit m,r Is
..Isolos, v llilu 4.rl vc 02) nnatl,s flan [tie approval of this u.Jeet
-s an o ,....inn his Ir o ,..need I, the rlannln, <.mmi ss ran.
9. this so4liv,s ion w d, A., su eitled ai a total develop ^en, p,ckase and i
.— r.l to re,ri,lY for a Point .tiling relative to the eenm, s n of
tee 0. u.. to ra aq, ,t Ordiroce prior to final approval end r ooNSUDO of
t11e hap if lire tuLJ.vntle is going to be developed as ,Net n see a.
0
V, IC= SuM1kL C"ciTACT 'It Pnitril : ?_ph411nY FOR [OSLIa'.CC clnl TIQ TOUC. IG
11- ;1 IIO :u: -
Sit, lop _eat
1 b •IVPI Ica fit snail c6,p I I t toe 11 t Nat ad,pt - J Un item Cu r lJ r :.l C
cru rm ararlrc Jl epee. Unlmrrn PI.,DI Cq Co,'. :.Llorll ue;trl: C ,•j re
Jul ou r applrra Lle Wigs also ordinances in ffect at the Lire e
tit relac'u, Pnr.rtt. I,.,s•+c°
_�. Prior to iau,ocr of bmlddil permit, for lvr hLL,ble c untrue...., ell Jv- ,
,"all be suc..utter, to Ill, Foothill 0sav ict fire Oiler Odt tr „y ..ales
srrl Jly fer fire Pr.l,ct,du it available. Lend rig co.-,let,- or re forfeu
fb • PmteRmn syttnnl,
_ ✓. Pr in o the i n[ or a building pernit for a r,v ,I.len tlal 5 +•I {Inl
n; tf s) fir major adduion to n ralstirre v r -CS). there.'plrrint 5,dl :e/
dry •l ul' +enl fee, Jt Lln• et la Dl liherl rat . nS, :• ,. III, 1 Lr 1,, tut let £
hr Iluoted to: City oeantl ......l fee. Pm: lee. urarna;^ fee. S. s t I . . ..J
rnrelol,mnt Fee. Pcfmit and plan Checking Res• and 6c boil feet.
a. rr nor In [he Iasuanve of a b.gdun, pemdt r al o rlal
develop,ent or addit,Ie to an eviting rev el -.�nq nti :e app, ICantr,!III '
ervelopnu •rt fees at toe es,d Lli,,o, mitt Seen f may nq {vd ^, 41t nn[ Y
by Ilmitr9 m: Systines Onelopmrnt Fee, Ora in agoePeP, ie ring: and pl Jn
Checking fees.,
_VK Street addresses mall be Dlo,lold by the bull lmg offlCml.
6. NIII Full 1 IT snail be construe led wi to fire eta rd,ut m nn
aterial and n
L-1I lu lP fir fir to ial.
c
). All turner dr,el ling, sb 11 have the buildup, elilvJUan rating The Str rPt
uD,radM ruin additi Dnal ucnd trim around ilnda.rs and wad Sl :ing or plant.
one wllrre appropriate.
G. FnlstiqI Sbu,lu,ct
1. Viol:dr corrplance with ore U.irorso ou n din, Code inr erne..['/ Penn cl..'an,e,
Piing der in, use. its amt (,r< rr,I1t,venCtl of e, It lip, b ",IJ II.It.
_ 2. Canting buildings) shall be made to chi with current go,levy and
toning regulations roc the in termed use or Ind building Snail N 11.of ,he,. e.
_ 1- ta{u in, :.age disposal fdnllnct shall be ry .e J. Ill drain- c,pa•J !�
to annl,ly with the IMlfoun Malting Code, and omferm Omld rig Pee.
x. Grading
�. Grading of the subject properly shall be i o,dance vrtL th^ 1Jn!o.-1
C,nldin Cod,.. sty Grading Standards and aCCe�taN g,I,nrrg I. acres. Ire
final grad lug Plan Shall be in nos tan ti al ten l Cie lntt wi lh [fie J;•pl uvrd
lial,l pal gradual plan.
_ A 1.11, 1t•pnr1 5.111 be m,,,.,d ny a gealifilid e•Iglnter race ...a Ly u,e
5 III of Cal ir.rma to per fain such wart.
J. A geological report "Lail be prepared by a nualrfinl enginorr or gcolegnl
and olAlteed at the [ire of application for gra J,n, plan cbccl.
lire final grading plan shall be subject to re aril al,, val Ly I:
Grading [u, u,l [tee and "ball an eemrle,,I prior to ......... at ", final
IdLJlnslpn awp or Issuance of b.11dmg permit ults Leer coot•” first.
S. As a .,.st•r -lot Witt n :bn, the following reonl n.1, shall be nee
a .::r.ly sn ill [e N:t'n and in ag'o,wee, enr[u[e J, gu neon lie :fig C, n':rlelr on
Of 411 On -site aramage fa[rlIUei n! p
+ a sa for Jevotering all parcels,
to p.c saturaatmn of elm Chilal n9 and oivuian.
b. Nor Sat• wa
o. r go
s Intl• far Safe danpasal of dralnater that are
:Jotted unto 0, over oc acent parcels, arc to be Jellnea[n, and
nio :aid Ln [fie zallzfacbm: a( the Building amt Sorely Division.
C. Billet• drainage 1- provurrntt, necessary for Jrwilerin, or olecting
In.. le: Jla laea prefect to e to be ,stalled er to 1,,,,n-, Of
nrllding re a rnr isle e w dl I:n, r r er:wrl =..t
t0- o Sallie W[c: to. ul nag, flow[nenthr.nf, L•mmg o within a
Parcel relatwe to Nuchra building To emit I regurs teL r
a. Final grAd.c, plain for h,l Parcel are in be snl,,tt,, to the Building
nn ;a(Ily Dnvisien for .reboot prior to i zaancc of building parents.
(ihnz :my be on an mcre :rental or c %Pali [a basis.)
!. All 'If Tl ban \I In d.Ceis of five )S) feet In Illti,al hvlgnt and Of
5:1 Or In ea ter shoe mall le is Jed ritb native gels.. up- cnmplelore
of gradmq .1 bona nth I alternative method Or erosion central Shell
he lel,let,d to the za U ilx inn of the Bmldiug Official. Inn 9ati0n
run he in—d:n to qen :,foe, IM 'fed and malntam grown: to a wi:It
6 non l ns aRer qer hift'on.
'PIICA'IT SMALL COIITACT THE EXPINURINCI DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
DIBr clrrs.
eemuli.m and Ser,c :lor Aee:•sz
1. 01di1At.d.S shall b• node by final map of all interior street n9lits-
sf of -nay anh all n :es.ary als-11111 aS shown no the tentotlae map.
L 2. Cedicauon shall be made of the (ol lowing rights -of -way an the followmq
_ sire l[s:
additional feet on 0 BRia Q3'B /I✓E._
Q _ _ ..atonal fcret o
eemtmnal /cos o
d. Corner properly line radius will be required per City standards.
W. All r.Irtl of vehicular ingress to end egress from shall be dedicated
as follow; _
5. Re l I'aC II east ants SW it be Provided In sir in, access to all parcels
r private r al:, devil, or parkin, a and shall be notlell on
[le a'a, or 11,11 be recorded [oncu/rm[ with the nap,
6. Adequate provisions shall he node Ion the 1-11111, 19,111 and Internal
11rculo Una of any truck, which will be uled for delivery of goods to
the property or In the operation of the PrcplSea buvnels.
2. P,Ivate drainage easenen[s for cross -lot drainage shall be required
and frail 1:1 1e11nea0.ed or noticed on the final map,
x B. All mtai -9 a a u+e-ts 111,11 within future right- Of .way are to b!
ou itelaimed or be delineated an the fop per City Engineer's requlrea :en[1.
9. 0frcunl1 Inc sirfi all for public uses Shan be dediCated to the City
,Mire fidcvalkl meander through private ......ty-
0 1
J, Sect I-' ..0 n"
1. Con :tl -Ct full 'Pill I:nolveneny In,lul mf. but not 1—tea to.
Curb and gutter, l,. C. Va ve:rt•n t. tidi� wall, Jll +e al•Vr o.l <Ir. S, pa ra nay
ter el and Street IIgn1S on all Interior Stlef lt.
2. A rim:—an of 26 -Inn, ,•ink• w dint w ,fo, a la.fnnl wirer r :rm to t•I
VV rrgbl -of -.ray Shall be Conslrunrd for all hall -tee won Sver t :.
_X d. Construct the (ollir —, miss mg 1- 11- vlalnts InUuJmg, tut not
binned to-
S tl•EEr Il dl :C
HfR_M2S
(HIM, A
I'll TEfl
_✓
p'C:L
4(-
l.iAlY.
Ch IVE
dpi R.
11 rE El
tlrad51
A.[. —
mo,r,
• ^I U1 : :I
ISLG :d
If
I pIIIEP
_ ✓_
✓
✓
� L/
_✓
rinclades landscaping and Irrigation on meter.
X A. Prior to any wart bfing perfarned in the public right- of -wry, fens
shall bP paid and an enlroaclmenL permit Sl :all be obinlhld from fee
City Engineer's Office. in addition to any .leer per mlu
5. Street lmprovtmrnt plans approved by [lie Cntr Eng lnrer An, prepared
by A Regulered Civil Engineer shall he re red, for all Strr•a
improvements, prior to issuance of an a emn -en[ pails 1. final
Plans and profiles shall lama the lacatiar dt an eerz Un, Sat i111y
facilities wftnm the righi-of -.ay.
-� 6. Surely Shall be posted and an agreement ere. oil' to tee sethta'tino
of tee City Engineer and he my n¢nrney. 'o'- "if a :l :g I.1111etlon
pr the public mipruvenen[z, prmr to recdremg Of the map ar the
izsnanae of building pernits, wbiceever come, first.
]. NI street improvements shall be Installed to the sa [I SEac [9mn or [he
City Eng meeq prior to occupancy.
B. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street Panic Signing shall be
Installed per the renulropen[S of the City Engineer.
9. Fa is tang ei[y road 11-en ring reconstruction shall lerelle open for
Vnrf iC at all tines with aceldate detoar ur
ding tnn,trur(in'i. A
cash deposit 'pall be raga fee [p S.uc.,he [di[ of gn Jing a.IJ
p'ving, wh¢n Stall be rermWed on cmnplebon of the co"101CUrwn to
roe satisfat tlon of tee Ci [y Engineer.
10. Walkways shall be Provided between public sidewalks and on Site
ped'striaa areas.
_X 11. Concentrated drainnge flour Shall net .. tiJewlks. Under Sid,•nalk
drains stall be Ins Ulled to City sU nna ids.
12. An energy die SlPitmr and /or erosion control ive shill fir installed
to the SatiSfa.t ion of Lim City Ch)in r at Ile end of Stub Ctrri ts.
A letter of aueptauce of Jramagt runoff fin" lbe J,n.nit,eau pr.•pe.';y
co mers stall be rcgniled.
4• 0�
d�
`J
prm n`ee .•+ r 1.. ,, , a
_ I, l,r `Colic r+r 11 4 • nSr Lle for Coot t. u[t,nn of .II on -site
Cr irwv fa.,l prix 'aloe ed br ,he City Lnglnfi e.
i. Intersect fin Lrd ni will be renmrN at :M1e to' low lol "Itlma:
X g. j,, nip..: ^1 : a rare .,Inm a-Al mmc.[ed as subject to
rl ooar.a ,r •:.r e�
lnu pnv,i mns a(r ::at r ,a 11,11, Iar.nre Danran ann a svn:pct to
"It 1101:`1 "o y OrdnlanC, 9O. ii.
x a, p d..11n,gr cnnir." India' flood p,otection w u
all will ne required to ` o
A r cte]t pe stru<ir,res b, diver ung meet r nofr to svee, o
,.ndra dram.
X 5. ;da l',:e Dr ov rz Inns span be maie for ac..en,1 Add iLlIoial of
S..rtace dd,ua•.,,.r,rj pert
6. letter of dc a . f' urvrst^ °m rdMt, w e' "-all be rgcred
ow fir, U., tract NAOI Onto private L e.
rm
X r. NE.PMOSA A u znal be deirgned a-.I i,3.i = ter = «y+nq
.. :/ o I, �• re [ 4
t� ands or l oled sn o! t r,ud Ech socl 1
anezcapede.. thbtrnn and rolleddrlveway roat vrc.na
priperty
w 111.
8. the follo..inl storm drain shall be Installed to the satisfaction or
ene my Ii.1-11
�.r
r _ of the cap. a broad -scale Noologte and drainage
[.jy cur liep ra:ent zNil Ec zuC,,,,,d to tA, City Engineer for
orilttres
_j( I Provide elecl utility ser'as.s tel"hod, and camel @l evlti.. 1.drdui[. ot
movie
2. nn uH;iuc: wr v„ me 11'1:0` fwn be installed uldergromnd
mcla lin, u[r M1 tresnalm.9 na Pr a --all less roan l2 eV.
'La g. Utility bierrebb ,all ebe prorided to the specification of the
aer•,ng u:rnly cs a, x and the n tr Elg,netr.
a. Cc •eloper small be responsible for the relocation of existing poble
utilities, as required)
x 5. D: •e!q per :1`11 to re:l Onabl, to, me installation of street tight'
I accordance .uh :ou pnu rn pFrorma Ed"do Cmrpanr and City standards.
X 6, lair, midi 1 r plan, 'lull be drsignCO and Least
uctM to m("t
,nt+,•If u.o Cp..,rnnga Cm•.uy :avr 0 ict (CCIDI, Foo Urlll
fun0110 al and tide f„v,ro • tel 111altn Dop.artnr•nt of the countyed
of San Rnrarr Inn. A Ic tter Of mmpl mace from M.M will le requv
p „nr lu nvurrnpm...
n, .r no[ ,.,n :,ru red from an oil n ties am other In tea ci tea
ngd.ddn s ,nmiv,a. ” "'E val or ten final .11 .111 be subject to any
rc,.,rr,dpd.ts tat nu, be "Clive` (,om them.
u
is
1i
Ii. Lp,rry al Rr2 riry ren is andl Alrpro pis
)( 1. Der nu [t tram olnrr agrdie lei will be remri'ed ax ful lo,•s,
_ A. COW,., for: _ -_
U. Cc,st, M1rtt eC.iUUn•, �np —i ul:a Urior to -1, .1 of -i -
gra.lmg errh.t)
X. C. im nermrdlno Cnrmt, Fim.l emnm Dino',
_-
X 2. A cony ar vre envemrrlx• Conditmns ape p.ar¢urnx (C.C. x a. 1)
add Articles of bulnrlaratien or the Ibivo..nerS 11s:OCIafdu. sul9.al
to fire appmvnl of ln.: Cit, nt m'op'e xmn be decordea ..in mis map
and a copy provided to the City.
X 1. Final dic.1 and tract maps shall Conform to City standards and
r
a. Aparcel emdo swall be orded prior to first ol.le suM iv,sion to
prevent Creation of unrecognised parCelS.
X 5. prior to recordation, a Ilallce of Intentou 1. form and join
Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed filth me City Council.
The engin in, costs involved in District Forcn[IOO mall be Earn,
by tie developer.
6. All perimeter landscaped parkways are required to be anne,ed into the
landscape maintenance district.
_ I. Landscaping and irrigation systems reWirN to br installyd on public
ri gp[- aF -waY on the per metur of this tract a gull lm wnUmN6Iy
intaincd by tide dv, lnt'dT until a l -I:ed by r rap Cill aml mmraed
lot. Lae landscape maintenance dill, ill.
J
J
i
I
O
Z
Z
O
O
�J
m
rn
c T
O Y
V-
ro
g
A
L
V L n
C
T
Y V
S
C
i
Y
Oa0�
9
U C L
a
L
U N W A
E d Y
O
W K
tti
a
O q L d
Y �
d d
O� L L
a T
OJ
U[O tnO
^
C
.CEd
r
C -�
LO
LaYO
LOiq
D`
S£WZ
U
V t NV C
m
CE
C
�F E
r-
ZZV ^
V
C LL�
d
O
C
'NE
VAOY
��11gL
^
CJ =
W Gfz
w
q
}!
a
O� L m
a
L•�
T
C:G'p d
A� ^nV-
q
0 E
O E O1 U N C
> A
L 2J
q Y
a C a
O K b>
6
C
C C d a
TY'l O L E
d
C L
d d
L O g O
U d C q
Y-
F 06
m
A
Y O 6
C E
dOU O
Y
YU
O d
LL
O M
NMw-
A Y A A
c'�- �
T
rvn 1n LL {n
U
U L N L U
L
C a
6
f
T
O L
a T a d
Y
A O
C T
9 W Y
O
F V1MS
LLNK11
L
C
W
T
L E'er
Or- -M N
Y
a
�•
MA
Lq
9
� LE
NLd C�
O
ON O
q
t>
dNtC
Y
rO
dO
NAaD
YiTV-
6
E^E
NL0AY9
N -,O
O
OZIPb
T
UA
dY
dN
NV
�LV
rEG
F-
U
W 1 W
U
C
w d C
O L L a L O
N 7
•� U
A C
L •r-
L
OfY
N a
L d C
q p L O
O
YG'rl3
J
U DYU
C
L 6a
Lp.CYU
O
r
L
U
^
OlO
�O
V
wKW
�
l- L G
d
U 6 S
Y
52 A
E er n
A
L a d
V
w z o
YO -
Y
c d�
o ro
>
A P
T o c
A
S G' C Z
FOLLO
U
C 6O TV C �
A D �L
n'
a
OHO
GL
O�
Y-d
w -�O
mE
Yod
f .cam
^
OJMWF
6 i- W
U
C •'
L
F
O1dY dL
d S] V- L
N
T
ON
N A
LY
�- N
i01 S
C- a
L q�0
F- N d d
>
O
W UaLQW
J
L•�'�ro
V
Z WOOF-
O
Q6N Jt/�
UO
•'
'-I
O�•�'�O
Y'- a�9
V
Y
U'�
Nroa
NC
d
NBC Y
- aaVl
••LY
MYACU
y
Q
ZU'
T�
q�dLL
ma
-�nL
C
LC E�
O
Z.-'OS
^O
Z
LOLdON
LL
LEd
Z.A
NO nNy
ZNd�d
-•
OOI�ZF
4-
O
Fir nL nA
F-'Y
F -r-L
OE
O
O
C"iYL
O
�
OUN
UL
� dLti
FANS
V1
VI W
Z O O LL LL
dA
L
U
W
w
Y
N I ddW
V
W
V C
qV•-
N
4
W N
O m
6UNOO
F-C
V1
6
p7
U
b
T
GKO30
N
ni
n
Q Z G
A
O�
r Q•
v
q N V d
O
3
do
N�A�
N
O O
L d V V
C L
d •-
9
�J
W
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 13, 1981
TO: City Council /City Manager
FROM: Harry J. Empey, Finance Dir ctor
SUBJECT: Increase in Dog License Fees
As is the case with many companies, the Humane Society is suffering from
the effects of inflation. Such is the thrust of the Humane Society's
presentation.
It has been two years since the last increase in dog license fees, and
this current increase is probable warranted.
The City has met with representatives of the Humane Society to iron out
some of the complaints being received by City staff concerning the
Society's activities.
An ordinance will soon follow this evening's action and will, hopefully,
be a uniform document that all contract cities will be using to guide the
functions of the Humane Society. Therefore any issues concerning service,
special problems or programs should probably be addressed when the
ordinance is presented to Council for their review and comments.
Attached for Council's review are letters received during the course of
discussions with the Humane Society.
HJE: cam
Attachments
"07.
714- 947 -3517
HUMANE SOCIE'Py
�V OF THE
• CHAFFFY iCOMMUNITV, IN47.
A JVNE I.S.
1010 EAST MISSION BLVD. 1 Hwy. 601
ONTARIO, OALIFORN IA
DI>61
May 12, 1981
TO: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga
FROM: Betty Fryman, General Manager
At the request of Mr. Harry Empey, I am forwarding information in advance
of the Council meeting May 20 when our request for increased license fees
is scheduled to be heard.
1. A consolidated report of our services to the City during the
complete 1979 -80 fiscal year.
• 2. Items from our proposed 81 -82 budget showing the anticipated
increases from the 79 -80 year in which the $10 license fee
was initiated.
E
As we stated earlier, inflation is the largest factor in our requirement for
additional Funding followed by the new state law mandating the keeping
of cats for 72 hours; additional funds will be needed for the new license
form which will include a mail -out reminder at the end of the 1981 -82 fiscal year.
If a member or members of the Council would like to meet with me prior to the
Council meeting in order to discuss any aspect of our contract with the
city, I will make myself available at such time or place as might be
convenient; the Society is concerned with providing the highest level of
professional service to the city .
q..3
714 - 947 -3517
HUMANE SOCI4:TY
OF THE
C_ ?_3FFEY COMNir':NITY, INC. .
A NON-PROFIT Ofl u'.9NIZATION. INC OPPOfl ATEO IU NE 1911
1010 EAST MISSION BLVD. (HWY. 60)
ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA
917!1
Fiscal year 1979 - 80
Consolidated Report to City of Rancho Cucamonga
6,943 Licenses Issued
3,119 Dogs Impounded
502 Dogs Returned Home
719 Dogs Adopted
1,613 Dogs Put to Sleep
178 Dog Bites Reported
161 Bites Investigated
337 Total Number of Visits Made
413 Citations Issued
413 Brought to Court
179 Convictions Obtained
23 Injured Animal Pick -ups •
407 Dead Animal Pick -ups
4,542 Day Calls
108 Night Calls
26,051 Miles Patrolled
448 Cats Put to Sleep
$92,503 License Fees Collected
$6,278 Impound Fees
•
• Humane Society of the Chaffey Community, Inc.
TENTATIVE BUDGET (PARTIAL) 1981 -82
•
Ll
1979 -80
1981 -82
First year of $10
Proposed
License Fee
Budget Items
$ 16,600
$ 8,600
Vehicle (6) leases
2,400
1,800
Disposal of dead animals
28,000
20,400
Kennel Supplies
6,000
3,000
Licenses (including mailing)
4,500
3,600
Advertising
9,000
7,000
Utilities
•
Telephone
3,000
1,800
11,000
9,500
Insurance
2,500
1,200
Legal /Audit
2,900
1,800
Veterinarian Service
250,000
203,400
Salaries (gross)
•
Ll
f it4- 947 -3517
HUMANE SOCIETY
OF THE
C,HAFFCY (COMMUNITY, INC.
A NON.PROFlT ORGANIZATION, INCORPORATE. JUNE I.S. •
Yom' -`P 1010 EAST MISSION BLVD. IHwv.$01
ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA
917.1
March 19, 1981
I o: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga
Copy to: His Honor, The Mayor
-Harry Empey, Director of Finance
,(Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
Subject: (1) DOG LICENSE AND IMPOUND/BOARD FEES, 1981 -82
(2) VACCINATION FEE FOR 1981 -82 RABIES CLINICS
The Humane Society of the Chaffey Community, Inc. requests that Council increase
fees for dog licenses and impound /board services for the 1981 -82 year commencing •
July 1, 1981 through June 30, 1982. We have included the existing license
schedule which has been in effect since 1979, and the impound /board fee schedule
which has been in effect since 1978.
The Board of Directors offers the following reasons for this action:
1. The rate of inflation since previously approved fees makes it impossible to
render the same level of service using reduced -value dollars.
The California State ruling which became effective January 1, 1981 which
mandates that cities impound all stray cats for a minimum period of 72 hours.
No funds have been allocated for this additional service. Compliance with
this new law on behalf of the city requires capital investment by the Society,
plus the costof day -to- day care, feeding and disposal .
3. Licenses written during the 1981 -82 year will have an additional copy
that would be mailed out as a reminder to renew in 1982. This service Is
offered in almost every city and county we have surveyed, and has been
0
�u�
Page 2.
0
requested by dog owners in the West End.
We are attaching a copy of a stuuy we completed last month showing license fees
in various cities and counties of southern Californa. Count,.. vill note that
many of these are higher than the requested increase, but it should be remembered
that all ( with the exception of Chaffey ) are supplemented with general revenue funds.
In addition, we have been asked to include a request by the Mount Baldy Veterinary
Medical Association that you approve an increase in their rabies vaccination fee
at the clinics from $2.00 to $2.50 to cover their increased costs.
We would appreciate you advising us when these requests are placed on the agenda.
0
EDF:sd
Enclosures
S i ncere ly ,
Elizabeth 0. Fryman
General Manager
/ r;
Proposed License Fee
1981 -82
Current Fee
-.=
Proposed Fee Schedule 40
3TU
V12 -.0- Male or Female
$15.00
$18.uu
Male or Female, late
$ 5,00
$ 6.00
Male or Female, spayed or neutered
$10.00
$12.00
Male or Female, spayed or neutered, late
$ 5.00
$ 6.00
Male or Female, Senior Citizen
$10.00
$12.00
Male or Female, Senior Citizen, late
$ 2.50
$ 3.00
Male or Female, spayed or neutered, Senior Citizen
$ 7.50
$ 9.00
Male or Female, spayed or neutered, Senior Citizen, late
After January 1 - Pro -Rate
for new dog or puppy before 5 months
$ 5.00
$ 6.00
Male or Female, new dog, new resident or
$ 2.50
$ 3.00
Puppy before 5 months.
Male or Female, new dog, new resident,
spayed or neutered.
$ 2.50
$ 3.00
Male or Female, Senior Citizen, new dog,
$ 1.25
new resident or puppy before 5 months.
$ 1.50
Male or Female, Senior Citizen, new resident
$ 1.00
$ 2.00
new dog, spayed or neutered. •
Replacement tag.
$ 1.00
$ 2.00
Transfer of a license that is current.
Must expire at same period as our license.
Impound /Board Fees
$10.00 $12.00 Impound fee, first offense
$15.00 $18.00 Impound fee, second offense
$ 2.00 $ 2.50 Board, per day, on impounds or
quarantine holding.
0
arma.E Scam
CIIAFFZY COGGUUff INC.
�ICENSEFECS
•
Canp.rison Study February 1981 ',ouWem
California
SIILLTER
LICENSE
ALTERED
SENIOR
LATE
TRANSFER
DUPLICATE
COMMENT
AZUSA -
6.00
3.00
don't have
be If of fee
not allowed
.50
BALDWIN PARK
15.00
5.00
don't have
5.00
not allowed
1.00
'
BEAUMONT
6.00
3.00
don't have
now
not allowed
1,00
BELL GARDENS
15.00
7.50
2.00
half of fee
not allowed
free
only one (1) dog per senior
citizen & it must be altered
BLYTHE
6.00
3.00
don't have
2.00
not allowed
1.00
BUREANK
10.00
5.00
don't have
5.00
not allowed
1.00
CHAFFEY HUMANE
10.00
5.00
half price
5,00
1.00
1.00
senior citizen credit allowed
by zoning, proof of 65 ncedr
COVINA
15.00
7.50
half price
half of fee
not a l lowed
1.00
only one (1) dog per senior
citizen for lower license fee
CUDAHY
15.00
5.00
don't have
be if of fee
1.00
1.00
_ DOWNEY
15.013
7.50
10.00 & 5.00
half of fee
2,00
2.00
i EL SEGUNDO
10.00
4.00
half price
half of "ee
not allowed
1.00
n
FONTANA
6.00
3.00
don't have
he if of .ea
not al lowed
1.00
GARDENIA
15.00
6.00
7.00 & 3.50
half of fee
not allowed
1.00
senior citizen credit allov+od
on one (1) dog only
GLENDALE
15.00
7.50
half price
3.00
not allowed
??
they use the same tag every
year.
HAWTHORNE
16.00
8.00
3.00 & 1.50
half of fee
not allowed
1.00
senior citizen credit allowed
on one (1) dog only
HERMOSA BEACH
12.00
6.00
don't have .
half of fee
not allowed
.50
LAKE ELSINORE
8.00
4.00
free (1) dog
none
not allowed
1.00
dog must be altered for the
--- ili-n 1� nor 1 (-
40 • •
anave -men
CHAFFry cors.:uartY IN,
LICENSE
FEES - cant.
Page 2
SHELTER
LICENSE
ALTERED
SENIOR
LATE
TRANSFER
DUPLICATE
COMILNT
LOMTA
17.00
6.50
don't have
Imre
not al lowed
1.00
LONG 13EACII
10.00
4.00
don't have
half of fee
not allowed
1.00
LOS ANGELES CITY
11.50
5.00
free (l) dog
5.00
not allowed
5.00
dog must be altered for the
senior eitilen to gel 1 fine
LYNWOOD
10.00
5.00
2.00
Imlf of fee
not allowed
1.00
dog must be aHcred for the
senior eilimn to get low lie
MALIBU
15.00
5.00
don't have
5.00
not allowed
1.00
MONROVIA
15.00
5.00
don't have
5.00
not allowed
1.00
NGR CO
10.00
5.00
1.00
half of fee
not allowed
1.00
dog must he altered & one ( 7
dog per senior citizen
OCEANSIDE
12.00
6.00
don't have
6.00
not allowed
3.00
ORANGE COUNTY
10.00
5.00
half Price
5.00
not allowed
2.00
PALOS VERDES
20.00
10.00
don't have
none
not allowed
??
no limit amount of dogs you
can have
PARAMOUNT
11.25
3.75
don't have
none
3.75
1.00
PASADENA
16.24
8.12
don't have
8.12
not allowed
.95
PICO RIVERA
12.00
7.00
don't have
3.00
2.00
2.00
PONIONA
15.00
5.00
don't have
5.00
1.00
1.00
RANCHO PALOS VERDAS
14.00
7.00
don't have
5.00
not allowed
1.00
SAN BERNARDINO CITY
8.00
3.00
don'thave
4.00
not a l lowed
1.00
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
10.00
free
don't have
15.00+
not allowed
1.00
there is a 25.00 late fee cv
ryga- e) - Jr.
( there will he
a fee far altered dogs for the new
license 1981 -82)
any altered dog if lie is not
purchased on lime.
40 • •
uu1,1E ZVloY
Clid: iEY C0`.:CVt:ITY INC.
10 omuy;,7�„'„r,n
SIZE LTER
LICENSE
ALTERED
'
SCENSE FEES - cont. Page 3
SENIOR LATE TRANSFER
)UPLICATE
•
COMMENT
SAN DIEGO
12.00
6.00
don`t have
6.00
2.00
2.00
SAN PEDRO
11.50
5.00
free (1) dog
5.00
not allowed
2.50
dog n nst he altered & ouc
(1) dog per senior citizen
SANTA BARBARA
10.00
5.00
2.50
5.00
net allowed
2.00
one (1) dog per senior cl(izcn
SANTA FE SPRINGS
10.00
5.00
free (1) dog
half of fee
not allowed
L.00
dog must be altered for the
senior citizen credit
SANTA MONICA
10.00
5.00
don't have
now
not allowed
1.50
UPLAND
8.00
4.00
don't have
4.00
not allowed
- .50
VERNON
15.00
5.00
don't have
half of fee
not al lowed
2.00
`.VEST COVINA
10.00
5.00
don't have
none
not allowed
1.00
RIVERSIDE CITY
10.00
5.00
1.00
20.00 810.00
1.00
.50
dog nnnt be altered & one
(1) dog per senior citizen
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
8.00
4.00
1.00
4.00
not allowed
2.00
dog must be altered & one
(1) dog per senior citizen
`�
TORRt.N CE
15.00
7.50
don't have
half of fee
not allowed
,50
CrrY OP RA \CI -10 Cl,'G \ \IOXG,.
STAFF REPORT
oil
F
• DATE: May 20, 1981
i
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
NO. 81 -01 - Amending the R -1 permitted uses, adding a
minimum dwelling width and depth, and requiring a design
review for all dwellings; to implement SB 1960
ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 13, 1981,
held a duly advertised public hearing to consider amendments to the
R -I section of the Zoning Ordinance which would implement Senate Bill
1960. SB 1960 will take effect July 1, 1981 and states that cities
cannot prohibit the placement of certain mobilehomes on a permanent
foundation on lots zoned for single family dwellings. The law does
allow cities to determine which lots or areas zoned for single family
dwellings are most compatible and designate those lots for mobilehome
use.
• Please find attached the Planning Commission Staff Report and Reso-
lution recommending approval of the attached proposed ordinance.
Since the Bill allows cities to determine and designate compatible
areas, the proposed ordinance finds that such use is most compatible
to the R -1 -7,200 zone and lots which do not exceed 7,200 sq. ft. in
area. With the existing design review process for single family
dwellings, mobilehome placements can be reviewed for architectural
compatibility. Architectural review is limited to roof overhang,
roof material and siding. All other development standards for con-
ventional single family dwellings, such setbacks and garages, would
apply. The intent of this Bill is to review the placement of mobile -
homes in the same manner as would be done with conventional housing.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the
proposed amendment as outlined in the attached ordinance and set
second reading for June 3, 1981,
Respectfully submitted,
BARRY K. HOGAN
City Planner
BKH:MV:cd
Attachments
�ct
CITY OF RA \Q-10 CUC" ` ",GA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 13, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Mogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZGNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
No. 81 -01 - Amending the R -1 permitted uses, add ng a
minimum dwelling unit width, and requiring Design Review
for all single - family dwellings
ABSTRACT: As a result of the passage of Senate Bill 1960, which
shall take effect July 1, 1981, Staff has prepared a proposed amend-
ment to the Zoning Ordinance which would satisfy the requirements of
the Senate Bill 1960. The Bill precludes a city from prohibiting
the installation of specified mobilehomes on permanent foundation
systems within lots zoned for single - family dwellings. Staff has
prepared an ordinance which designates specific areas where mobile -
hones would be permitted, based upon compatibility, and will be
presenting the Ordinance to the City Council at their meeting of May
20, 1981. We have reviewed the Ordinance with the City Attorney and
have made appropriate changes in accordance with his review. The
Ordinance is presented to the Planning Commission for review, comment
and recommendation to the City Council. Since SB 1960 becomes
effective July 1, 1981 it is imperative that this Ordinance be acted
upon expeditiously. Attached is a copy of the Ordinance and a Planning
Commission Resolution recommending approval of said Ordinance to the
City Council.
BACKGROUND: Senate Bill 1960 precludes cities from totally pro-
hibiting the placement of specified mobilehomes on a permanent
foundation within single - family zones. However, the Bill does allow
cities to designate specific lots which are zoned for single - family
dwellings, for placement of mobilehomes if the lots are determined
to be compatible for such mobilehome use. The Bill further allows
cities to subject mobilehome placement to ail of the development
.standards to which a conventional single - family dwelling is subjected
to; including, but not limited to building setback standards, side
and rear yard requirements, standards for enclosures, access, parking,
minimum dwelling unit sq. footage, and architectural requirements.
However, architectural requirements imposed on the mobilehome itself
shail be limited to its roof overhang, roofing material and siding
material. In addition, the City can require that such mobilehomes
be placed on permanent foundations in accordance with appropriate
building regulations.
ITEM G
C
ZOA 81 -01 -2- May 13, 1981 •
After attending several seminars and discussion groups relative to
SB 1960, we have found various methods of implementation. The
Bill can be implemented through many different approaches such as:
1. Specific plans, developed :o designate specific areas
where mobilehomes may be placed through determination
of compatibility;
2. Mobilehome overlay or combining zone developed where
specific findings of compatibility are applied. Any-
one desiring to put a mobilehome on a single - family
lot would be required to apply for the overlay zone;
3. Specific target areas designated for mobilehome use
for purposes of providing affordable housing such as
redevelopment areas or community development block
grant areas. This would require certain amendments
to the General Plan Housing Element for its imple-
mentation;
4. The City also has the option not to adopt any desig- •
nated areas or review processes and allow mobilehomes
to be placed on any lots on a city -wide basis;
5. Move -on permit process established whereby any dwelling
unit that is moved onto a single - family lot would re-
quire the application of a Conditional Use Permit.
This requires an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to
set up the Conditional Use Permit procedure for house
move -ons, it would include conventional housing as well
as mobilehomes;
6. Amendments to the single - family residential zone to
designate a specific zoned category in which the
mobilehomes would be permitted. This would allow
our Design Review to occur as well as all other
requirements.
After review of all of the alternatives for the implementation of
SB 1960 we felt that the most effective and immediate way to imple-
ment the state law would be to amend the current R -1 section of the
Zoning Ordinance to add mobilehomes on single - family lots as a
•
)�q.
• ZOA 81 -01 -3- May 13, 1981
permitted use on 7 200 s ft. lots or smaller. Mobilehomes are
more compatible to conventional dwellings on 7,200 sq. ft. lots
or smaller as they are usually more closely related in terms of
size and design. Mobile homes are not compatible to conventional
hoi!�ing on larger lots because of the significant difference in
size and design. The amendment, as proposed, would allow the Design
Review Committee to determine if the placement of a mobilehome is
compatible with the existing area in which it is being proposed. In
addition to the amendment to the permitted uses, staff is proposing
that a dwelling writ width for all dwellings within the single - family
residential zone be adopted at a minimum width of 24', excluding the
garage. This establishes a design standard as it relates to the lot
width and at the same time assists in creating better compatibility.
The proposed amendment also is adding a paragraph within the R -1 zone
which reinforces the Design Review Ordinance already in effect. The
amendment merely clarifies that all dwelling units within the single -
family residential zone are subject to design review by the Design
Review Committee.
• We don't believe that there will be a significant influx of people
requesting placement of mobilehomes throughout the City within the
R -1 -7,200 ft. zone. Most of the existing lots of 7,200 sq. ft.,
or smaller legal nonconforming lots, either contain existing dwellings
or the lots are located within an older area and would require infill
which would be most likely compatible for mobilehome usage. The only
other way which mobilehomes could be developed within the single -
family zone, other than within a mobilehome park, would be through a
mobilehome subdivision which would be subject to the review processes
which any conventional housing subdivision is presently subjected to.
Please find attached a copy of Part I of the Initial Study. Staff
has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has not indicated any
significant adverse impacts as a result of these amendments. There-
fore, it is recommended that a Netative Declaration be issued for
this project.
CORRESPONDENCE: Thus item was advertized as a public hearing in
the Daily Report Newspaper and we have received no written or oral
communications regarding it.
I ��
ZOA 81 -01 -4- May 13, 1981 •
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
conduct a public hearing to consider any public input relative to
the proposed amendments. If the Commission concurs with the findings
of the Staff Report and the proposed amendments, then it is recom-
mended that they adopt the attached Resolution which recommends
approval of the Ordinance to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
BARRY K. HOGAN
City Planner
BKH:MV:cd
Attachments:
Senate Bill 1960 .
Initial Study
Resolution of Approval
Proposed Ordinance
is
b
Nli
4_.
Senate Bill No. 1960
CHAPTER 1142
J , ••
An act to add Section 65952.3 to the Government Codc, and to
amend Section 183oo of the Health and Safety Code, relating to
zoning.
(Approved by Governor Se [ember 26, 1980. Filed with
Secretary of State September 26, 1980.1
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SR 1960, Rains. Zoning: mobilehomes.
Existing law does not preclude a city, including a charter city,
county, Or cityand county from prohibiting the installation ofccrtain
mobilehomes on foundation systems on lots zoned for single -family
dwellings.
This bill would make such a prohibition, but would specify that
such installation may be subject to certain other requirements
applicable to conventionally constructed single - family residential
dwellings. However, any architectural requirements imposed on the
mobilehome Structure itself would be limited to roof overhang,
roofing material, and siding material. It would permit the
designation of t
p ... e ibed manner. its e within single-family
would makea specified finding in
and
declaration.
This bill would become operative July 1, 1981.
The people Of the Stale of California do enact as 16110 —
SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares that
manufactured housing, which includes mobilehomes, offers
Californians an additional opportunity to own and live in decent,
safe, and affordable housing on a permanent basis.
SEC. 1.5. Section 65852.3 is added to the Government Code, to
read: or city and
65852.3. A city, including a charter city, county, Y
county shall not prohibit the installation of mobilehomes certified
under the National Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standards
Act of 1974 (42 US.C. Section 5401, or seq.) on a foundation system,
pursuant to Section 18551 of the I)ealth and Safety Code, on lots
rOned for single - family. dvvellings�-However, _a _ city including a
charter city, county, or city-and county, may designate lots zoned for
single- family dwellmgs for mobile as described in this section,
.which lots are determined to be compatible for such mobilehome
use. A city, including a charter city . county, or city and county may
'subject any such mobilehome and the lot on which it is placed to any
or all of the same development standards to which a conventional
Ch. 1142
single family residential dwelling an the same lot would be subject.
inelurling, but not limited to, building setback standards, side and
rear yard requirements, standards for enclosures, access, and vehicle
parking and architectural, aesthetic requirements, and rainhmmm
square footage requirements. Ilmvever, any architectural
requirements imposed on the mobilehome structure itself, exclusive
of any requirement for any and all additional enclosures, shall be
limited to its roof overhang. roofing material, and siding rand co l.In
no case may a city, including a charter city, cn unty. or city and county
apply any development standards which will have the affect of
totally precluding mobilehomes from being installed as permanent
residences-
- SEC.2. Section 18300 of the Health and Safety Code is amended
to read:
18.301(. (a) The provisions of this part apply to all parts oft the
state and supersede any ordinance enacted by any city, cable to the
city and county, whether general law or chartered, app
provisions of this part. Except as provided in Section 18930, the
commission may adopt regulations to interpret and make specific the
provisions of Lris part and when adopted such regulations shall apply
to all parts of the state.
(b) Upon 30 days' written notice from the governing body to the
department, any city, county, or city and county may assume the
responsibility for the enforcement of this part, the building standards
published in the State Building Standards Code relating to
mobilehome parks, travel trailer parks, recreational trailer parks,
temporary trailer parks, incidental camping areas, and tent camps,
and the regulations adopted pursuant to the provisions of this part
following approval by the department for such assumption.
(c) The commission shall adopt regulations which set forth the
conditions for assumption and may include required qualifications of
gocalificatiornss requiregd n in the h egula[iotn�nwh ch fort
Seth forth the
conditions for assumption shall relate solely to the ability of local
agencies to enforce properly the building standards published in the
State Building Standards Code relating to mobilehome parks, travel
trailer parks, recreational trailer parks, temporary trailer parks,
incidental camping areas, and tent camps, and the other regulations
relating to mobilehome parks promulgated pursuant to this part. The
regulations which set forth the conditions for:asunsptlon Shall not set
requirements for local agencies dif(erem than those which the state
maintains for its own enforcement program. When assumption is
approved, the department shall transfer the responsiblliy for
enforcement to the city, county, or city and county, together with all
records of mobilehome parks within the jurisdiction of the city,
cc•mty or city and county.
part, the building event tandards imbli,hedt in ttlhe State lln ld this
g
W
—3— �i Ch. 1142
Standards Code relating to mobilchome parks, travel trailer parks,
recreational trailer parks, terporary trailer parks, incidental
camping areas, and lent camps, or the other regulations adopted
pursuant to the provisions of this part by a city, county, or city and
county, the department $ball enforce the provisions of this part, lire
building standards published in the State Building Standards Code
relating to mobilchome parks, travel trailer parks, recreational
trailer parks, temporary trailer parks, incidental camping areas, and
tent camps, and the other regulations adopted pursuant to the
provisions of this part in any such city, county, or city and county
after the department has given written notice to the governing body
of such city, county, or city and county setting forth in what respects
the city, county, or city and county has failed to discharge its
responsibility, and the city, county, or city and county has failed to
initiate corrective measures to carry out its responsibility within 30
days of such notice.
(2) Where the department determines that the local enforcement
agency is not properly enforcing this part, the local enforcement
agency shall have the right to appeal such a decision to the
commission.
(e) Any city, city and county, or county, upon written notice from
the governing body to the department, may cancel its assumption of
responsibility for the enforcement of this part. The department,
upon receipt of such notice, shall assume such responsibility within
30 days.
(!) Every city, county, or city and county, within its jurisdiction,
shall enforce all of the provisions of this part, the building standards
published in the State Building Standards Code relating to
rnobilehome parks, travel trailer parks, recreational trailer parks,
temporary trailer parks, incidental camping areas, and tent camps,
and the other regulations adopted pursuant to the provisions of this
part, as they relate to mobilehomes and to mobilehome accessory
_buildings or structures located outside of mobilehome parks,
(g) The provisions of this part shall not prevent local authorities
of any city, county, or city and county, within the reasonable exercise
of their police powers:
(1) From establishing, subject to the requirements of Section
658.123 of the Government Code, certain zones for mobilchmnoS or
mobilehome parks, travel trailers, travel trailer parks, recreational,
trailer parks, temporary trailer parks, or tent camps within such city,
county, or city and county, or establishing types of uses and locations,
including family mobilchome parks, adult mobilchome parks,
mobilchome condominiums, mobilehome subdivisions, or
mobilehome planned unit developments within such city, county, or
city and county, as defined in the zoning ordinance, or from adopting
rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution prescribing
iondards of lot, yards, or park area, landscaping, walls or enclosek
ns, access, and vehicle parking or from prescribing the pro hib"
V� �-J
Ch. 1142 —4—
of certain uses for mobilchome parks, travel trailer parks,
recreational trailer parks, temporary trai`Or parks, or tent camps.
(2) From regulating the construction ind use of equipment and
facilities located outside of a mobilchome or camp car used to supply
gas, water, or electricity thereto, except facilities owned, operated,
and maintained by a public utility, or to dispose of sewage or other
waste therefrom when such facilitie are located outside a
mobilehome park, travel trailer park, recreational trailer park, or
temporary trailer park for which a permit is required by this part, or
the regulations adopted pursuant there[[.
(3) From requiring a permit to use a mobilehome or camp car
outside a mobilehome park, travel trailer park, recreational trailer
park, or temporary trailer park for which a permit is required by this
part or by regulations adopted pursuant thereto, and require a fce
therefor by local ordinance commensurate with the cost of enforcing
this part and local ordinance with reference to the use of
mobilehomes and camp cars, which permit may be refused or
revoked if such use violates any provisions of this part or Part 2
(commencing with Section 18") of this division, any regulations
adopted pursuant thereto, or any local ordinance applicable to such
use.
(4) From requiring a local building permit to construct an
accessory structure for a mobilehome when such mobilchome is
located outside a mobilehome park, travel trailer park, recreational
trailer park or temporary trailer park, under circumstances which
the provisions of this part or Part 2 (commencing with Section 18000)
of this division and the regulation adopted pursuant thereto do not
require the issuance of a permit therefor by the department.
SEC. 3. This act shall become operative July 1, 1981.
•
a
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
• the proposed project.
9
PROJECT TITLE: ZONIM(I ORD, AMEND. Skof
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
AnnIAAAnAI/A _ /A7)4m P&-F lAir: R_(.
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Mg{ [ H"A'Ai(J I C) '(P U IM,
LOCATION OF, PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL. AGEN I�S AND THE: AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
OF PROJECT:
L
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUAR OTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY:
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON'=rAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
IS AMENDti4I-141 IjdIL1, L'f'PM POf� (TANS M ,M C4Y
\NkOctf P& OF AN 0RWM NkffN F
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
No
r Cn;�
E