HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/07/01 - Agenda PacketCA.Wn3 ,
CITY OF
_ice •,�,n :� Y
RANCHO CU AXIONCA
CITY COUNCIL
t� �a
AGENDA
1977
Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
July 1, 1981 - 7:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in Writing. The deadline
for submitting these items is 5:00 P.M. on Thursday prior to the first and third
Wednesday of each month. The City Clerks Office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call: Frost, Mikels . Palombo_, Bridge_, and Schlosser.
• C. Approval of Minutes: June 3, 1981.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
A. Wednesday, July 8, at 7:00 p.m. - Planning Commission meeting - Lion's
Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. .
B. Tuesday, July 14, at 7:00 p.m. - Historical Commission meeting - Lion's
Park Community Center - East Room, 9161 Base Line Road.
C. Tuesday, July 14, at 7:00 p.m. - Next regular City Council Meeting will
meet on Tuesday instead of Wednesday.
D. Presentation of Victoria Better Homes 6 Gardens Award to the city by
the William Lyon Company.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -7 -1 in the amount of
$ 418,810.00.
City Council Agenda -2- July 1, 1981
•
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Bonnie J. David 2
and Mathilda A. McBride, Bravo Pizza, 8800 -B Base Line Road,
for On -sale Beer and Wine Eating Place.
C. Annexation #3 to Landscape Maintenance District O1 for Parcel 3
Map 5922 and Tract No. 10491.
It is recommended that Council approve the resolution of
intent to annex Parcel Map 5922 and Tract No. 10491 to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and setting the date
for the public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -100 9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXA-
TION NO. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -101 10
. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT;
DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3
TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO.
d. Change of Street Name from Mango Street to Morningstar Lane 12
in Tract No. 9583. It is recommended that the City Council
adopt the resolution changing the street name.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -102 14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE
NAME OF MANGO STREET WITHIN TRACT 9583 TO
MORNINGSTAR LANE.
e. Award of North Town Street and Drainage Improvement Phase 15
II. Sealed bids were received in the Office of the City
Clerk on June 24, at 2:00 p.m. It is recommended that the
contract be awarded to Schramm 6 Walters Contractors, Inc.
for $106,713.45 and authorize the execution of the contract.
J. Set Public Hearing date of July 14, 1981 for Environmental
Assessment and Planned Development No. 80 -12 (TT 11663) -
Marlborough Development Corporation. A request for change
of zone from R -2 (two family residential) To R- 2 -P.D. (two
family residential- planned development) for a total develop-
ment of 413 townhouses on 40 acres located on the east side
of Archibald, south side of Church, west side of Ramona -
APN 1077 - 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077 - 631 -03.
Is k. Set Public Hearing date of July 14, 1981 for a request for
time extension for Director Review No. 79 -28 - Vanir Develop-
ment Company. Proposed office complex located on the
northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue.
City Council Agenda -3- July 1,
1981
•
f. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6103, Agreements, and Security -
20
New West. Located on the east side of Mayberry between
Wilson and Rancho.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -103
27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 6103 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
6103), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
g. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
28
Agreement for 8153 is Sends, Road. Submitted by Randall
and Cheryl Ward.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -104
32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM RANDALL AND CHERYL WARD, HUSBAND
AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME.
•
h. Release of Temporary Occupancy Permit (T.O.P.) Bond for
33
the Goeden Company.
Tract 9569 - T.O.P. bond for the Sales Office /garage
conversion in the amount of $2,000.
Tract 9569 - T.O.P. bond for subdivision sign in the
amount of $500.
i. Release of Bond for Tract 9472: located on the north side
34
of 19th Street west of Haven Avenue. Owner: Boulevard
Development.
Landscaping Bond $32,500
J. Set Public Hearing date of July 14, 1981 for Environmental
Assessment and Planned Development No. 80 -12 (TT 11663) -
Marlborough Development Corporation. A request for change
of zone from R -2 (two family residential) To R- 2 -P.D. (two
family residential- planned development) for a total develop-
ment of 413 townhouses on 40 acres located on the east side
of Archibald, south side of Church, west side of Ramona -
APN 1077 - 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077 - 631 -03.
Is k. Set Public Hearing date of July 14, 1981 for a request for
time extension for Director Review No. 79 -28 - Vanir Develop-
ment Company. Proposed office complex located on the
northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue.
City Council Agenda -4- July 1, 1981
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -01:
ACACIA. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family resi-
dential) to R- 3 -P.D. (multiple family /planned development)
for the development of a planned condominium complex con-
sisting of 84 dwelling units on 9.6 acres of land located
approximately on the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and
Foothill Blvd. - APN 207 - 191 -31 and 40.
ORDINANCE NO. 149 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207 - 191 -31 AND 40
FROM R -3 TO R- 3 -P.D, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
84 CONDOMINIUMS ON 9.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BARER AVENUE AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -03:
RLS ASSOCIATES. A change of zone from A -1 (limited
agriculture) to R- 2 -P.D. (multiple family /planned develop-
ment) for 4.55 acres of land located on the west side of
Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road
for the development of 28 condominiums - APN 208 - 061 -03.
ORDINANCE NO. 150 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208 - 061 -03 FROM A -1
(LIMITED AGRICULTURE) TO R- 2 -P.D. (MULTI-
FAMILY /PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) AND GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE
BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -13:
DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT. A change of zone from R -3
(multiple family residential) to R- 3 -P.D. (multiple family/
planned development) for 11.5 acres of land located on the
east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Road for
the development of 240 condominiums - APN 202 - 1.81 -12,
and 27 (portion).
ORDINANCE NO. 151 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUG6M0NGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 181 -12, 21
(PORTION) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE, FROM R -3
(MULTI - FAMILY) TO R- 3 -P.D. (MULTI-FAIIILY/
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT).
35
36
62
j
63
h
94
E
City Council Agenda
-5-
July 1, 1981
D. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTROL OF BLOWING SAND AND 95
SOIL EROSION.
The proposed ordinance adopts portions of the San Bernardino
County Code by reference. The adoption of this ordinance
is necessary because the County Code sections were amended
since the last time the City adopted similar portions of
the County Code by reference.
ORDINANCE NO. 152 (first reading) _ 104
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY h
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.16 TO TITLE 8
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING
BY REFERENCE CHAPTER 1 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 6
OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE (COMMENCING
WITH SECTION 62.011) TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONTROL
OF BLOWING SAND AND SOIL EROSION.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
•
A. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN REVISION. Staff report
106
by Lauren Wasserman.
At a previous council meeting, concern had been expressed
by the Council regarding the handling of hazardous waste
materials. Since that time, the City Attorney has advised
us that this has been pre - empted by the State.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -6
107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE REVISED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN,
B. CABLE T.V. REPORT. Staff report by Dan Coleman, Assistant
108
Planner.
A report on the status of CATV in Rancho Cucamonga and
presentation of Planning Commission recommendation regarding
cable television in new developments.
C. AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK PROPOSALS FOR THE DESIGN OF HERITAGE
137
PARK. Staff report by Bill Holley.
'
Staff is requesting authorization to distribute requests
for proposals on the design of Heritage Park to landscape
architecture firms.
•
•
10
City Council Agenda
-6-
D. A RESOLUTION CREATING A REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET FUND.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE
FUND.
E. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82 AND LOANING FUNDS TO
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
July 1, 1981
F. A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY.
RESOLUTIO14 NO. 81 -107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
7. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled
meeting on Tuesday, July 14, 1981.
A MEETING OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WILL FOLLOW
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
140
141
142
146
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, June 17,
1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser
who led in the pledge of allegiance.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur
H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Samuel
Crowe; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Barry Hogan;
City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holley; and Finance
Director, Harry Empey.
Approval of June 3, 1981 minutes. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels
to approve the minutes as revised. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
2. ANNOUNCEME ?7S
a. Mayor Schlosser read a letter from Casson Associates commending Senior Planner
Michael Vairin and his staff for their cooperation, guidance, and high level of
professionalism in the development of their site in the City.
b. Mayor Schlosser congratulated Lloyd Hubbs and extended Council's appreciation
for the good report from George H. Mimack to Lloyd and his staff.
c. Councilman Mikels said he had sat in on SANBAG meeting and said that there
was no money [or Route 30 right -of- way - protection pledged. He said that SB 215,
if "xsed,might provide a token amount for preservation of the freeway corridor.
•d. Council requested an addition to the agenda, item 5G, Et£wanda Specific Plan
Committee Appointments.
e. Councilman Palombo reported that the City Council subcommittee met with the
Chamber of Commerce. He said the Chamber needed approximately $2500 and by 4 p.m.
today $1500 had been pledged toward this from the business community.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -7 -1 in the amount of $418,810.00
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Bonnie J. David and Mathilda A.
McBridge, Bravo Pizza, 8800 -B Base Line Road, for On -sale beer and wine eating
place.
c. Annexation 03 to Landscape Maintennce District 91 for Parcel Map 5922 and
Tract No. 10491.
It is recommended that Council approve the resolution, of intent to annex
Parcel Map 5922 and Tract No. 10491 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and
setting the date for the public hearing.
NO. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT;
DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3
TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO.
d. Change of Street Name from Mango Street to Morningstar Lane in Tract No.
9583. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution
changing the street name.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE
NAME OF MANGO STREET WITHIN TRACT 9583 TO
MORNINGSTAR LANE.
e. Award of North Tow Street and Drainage Improvement Phase II. Sealed bids
were received in the Office of the City Clerk on June 24 at 2:00 p.m. It is
recommended that the contract be awarded to Schramm 6 Walters Contractors, Inc.
for $106,713.45 and authorize the execution of the contract.
f. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6103, Agreements, and Security - New West. Located
on the east side of Mayberry between Wilson and Rancho.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 6103, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
6103), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
g. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 8153
La Sends Road. Submitted by Randall and Cheryl Ward.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM RANDALL AND CHERYL WARD, HUSBAND
AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME.
h. Release of Temporary Occupancy Permit (T.O.P.) Bond for the Goeden Company.
Tract 9569 - T.O.P. bond for the Sales Office /garage conversion in the amount
of $2,000.
Tract 9569 - T.O.P. bond for the subdivision sign in the amount of $500.
i. Release of Band for Tract 9472: located on the north side of 19th Street
west of Haven Avenue. Owner: Boulevard Development.
11 request I:or change of zone from a -� (two family residential) to
(two family residential- planned development) for a total development of 413
townhouses on 40 acres located on the east side of Archibald, south side of
Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1077- 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077 - 631 -03.
k. Set Public Hearing date of July 14, 1981 for a request for time extension
for Director Review No. 79 -28 - Vanir Development Company. Proposed office
complex located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
4A. ENVIRONMENPAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -01: ACACIA. A
change of zone from R -3 (multiple family residential) to R- 3 -P.D. (multiple
family /planned development) for the development of a planned condominium complex
consisting of 84 dwelling units on 9.6 acres of land located approximately on
the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill Blvd. - APN 207- 191 -31 and 40.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 149
ORDINANCE NO. 149 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 207 - 191 -31 AND 40 FROM R -3 TO R- 3 -P.D.
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 84 CONDOMINIUMS ON 9.6 ACRES
OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BAKER
AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 149. Motion carried 4 -0 -0 -1 ( Mikels abstaining).
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
John Klempner, 7541 Dartmouth. Questioned whether provisions were being made
for school facilities. Mr. Wasserman answered his questions mentioning the
growth management plan and the requirement of a letter from the affected
school district with a fee of $1600 per unit for any project being built to
help finance school facilities.
Gwen Manera, 7534 Dartmouth.
Ken Manera, 7534 Dartmouth.
Bob Dixon, 7544 Dartmouth. He stated that they were primarily interested in
the next item on the agenda. However, they were essentially opposed to any
multi - family type dwelling units.
There being no further response from the audience, Mayor Schlosser closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Bridge stated that this item has been gone over publically for several
months. He said it was a good project.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the project and Ordinance
No. 149. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Palombo, Bridge,
and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: Mikels.
Deputy City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 150 in the City
Clerk's absence.
ORDINANCE NO. 150 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208- 061 -03 FROM A -1
(LIMITED AGRICULTURE) TO R- 2 -P.D. (MULTI-
FAMILY /PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) AND GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE
BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 150. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Bob Dixon, 7544 Dartmouth. He presented many questions for answering.
Tom Harris, architect representing the developer, responded to the
questions presented by Mr. Dixon.
Pam Stewart, 10050 salsa
Frederick Stewart, 10050 Balsa.
in opposition to the project.
Doug Hone, Hone and Associates.
Carl Evans, 10072 Balsa.
Morris Schaefer, 9157 La Gran.
Ken Manera
Presented Council with petitions of those
Richard Miller. Also had a list of signatures on a petition opposing the
development.
There being no further response from the audience, Mayor Schlosser closed the public
hearing.
Councilman Frost suggested that this be set for second reading on August 5 and for
the developer to make himself available to the people in explaining the project.
Mayor Schlosser set August 5 for second reading.
Council set July 10 at 7:00 p.m. as a time for Mayor Schlosser, Councilman Mikels,
along with staff members to meet with Mr. Klempner and his neighbors to explain
former actions of Council, and to apprise them of the process in obtaining approval
to build in the community,
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:55 p.m.
with all members of the Council and staff present.
i
Growth. Mr. Frye presented a plaque to the city to display along with other awards
given to the city.
INVESTMENT. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family residential) to R- 3 -P.D.
(multiple family /planned development) for 11.5 acres of land located on the east
side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Road for the development of 240 condo-
miniums - AFN 202 - 181 -12, and 21 (portion).
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 151.
ORDINANCE NO. 151 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 181 -12, 21 (PORTIOI0
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE, FROM R -3 (MULTI - FAMILY)
TO R- 3 -P.D. (MULTI - FAMILY /PLANNED DEVELOPMENT).
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 151. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was:
Mr. Jack Tarr, 270 S. Crystal, Costa Mesa, representing Diversified
Investment.
There being no further public response, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Mayor Schlosser set July 14 for second reading of Ordinance No. 151.
4D. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTROL OF BLOWING SAND AND SOIL EROSION
The proposed ordinance adopts portions of the San Bernardino County Code by
reference. The adoption of this ordinance is necessary because the County
Code sections were amended since the last time the City adopted similar portions
of the County Code by reference.
Councilman Mikels requested a map showing the boundaries of the subject area.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 152.
ORDINANCE NO. 152 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING
A NEW CHAPTER 8.16 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
CHAPTER 1 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 6 OF THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE (COMMENCING WITH SECTION
62.011) TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONTROL OF BLOWING
SAND AND SOIL EROSION.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to waive the entire reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5 -0.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
5A. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN REVISION. Staff report by Lauren
Wasserman.
At a previous council meeting, concern had been expressed by the Council
regarding the handling of hazardous waste materials. Since that time, the City
Attorney has advised us that this has been pre - empted by the State.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public input regarding Resolution No.
81 -6. There being no response, Mayor closed the public portion of the meeting.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 81 -6 and
to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman
read the title of Resolution No. 81 -6.
P11 **AiD 0 Orlw„9m:3 C7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
REVISED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGE-
MENT MASTER PLAN.
5B. CABLE T.V. REPORTS. Staff presentation by Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner.
Mr. Coleman presented a report on the status of CATV in Rancho Cucamonga and
made a presentation of the Planning Commission recommendation regarding cable
television in new developments. Staff was seeking direction as to whether Council
wanted to continue with the County ordinance or draft a new ordinance. If council
wished to have an ordinance drafted, then staff was seeking direction as to the
type of ordinance desired.
After much discussion, Councilman Mikels suggested that Council meet with staff
individually for ideas, and then draft an ordinance for review. He also suggested
that staff get more input from the CATV companies and from the BIA and developers.
Council also requested staff to contact the BIA and other involved individuals regard-
ing notices of the time trenching would be done with the intent that T.V. cables
could be installed at this time and perhaps with a sharing of the costs.
5C. AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK PROPOSALS FOR THE DESIGN OF HERITAGE PARK. Staff
report by Bill Holley.
Staff was requesting authorization to distribute requests for proposals on the
design of Heritage Park to landscape architecture firms.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to authorize the Community Services
Director to request RFPs for the design of Heritage Park. Motion carried unanimously
5 -0.
Councilman Mikels asked whether it was appropriate for the Mayor to sign the
cooperation agreement as both Mayor and Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency.
Mr. Crowe said it was all right for Mr. Schlosser to sign the agreement for both
agencies.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution Nos. 81 -105,
81 -106, and 81 -107, and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously
5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read the titles.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE
FUND.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82 AND LOANING FUNDS TO
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
5G. ADDED ITEM: Advisory Committee Appointments for the Etiwanda Specific
Plan.
Councilman Frost suggested that Council make final appointments on July 14.
It was pointed out that at the last Planning Commission meeting, the Commission
appointed Richard Dahl as an alternate to Peter Tolatoy. Council thought that
was a good idea to have an alternate especially since their representative was
also the chairperson.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to appoint Arthur Bridge as the
alternate to Jim Frost. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to appoint Michael Palombo and
Phil Schlosser as input persons. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo. NOES: Bridge and Schlosser.
L
Staff said they would get a letter out the following day with a stamped self
address envelope and a citizen's application form enclosed.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
Mr. Crowe responded by stating that he had a report to give in Executive Session
regarding penditing litigation.
7. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to adjourn the meeting with an
Executive Session following the Redevelopment Agency meeting, not to reconvene
this evening, but to reconvene on Tuesday, July 14, 1981 for the next regular
city council meeting. Meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
• AGENDA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JULY 1, 1981
1. DESIGNATION OF CONSULTANT FOR REDEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
Because of a potential conflict with clients in another community,
the original redevelopment contractor, Envista, has asked to be
released from the performing of work in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Therefore, it is recommended that Municipal Services Incorporated
be employed as consultants to the city on matters relating to
redevelopment.
2. ADOPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT BY -LAWS.
These are guidelines for conduting operations of the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency. It is required that these be established and
that they conform to State Law.
. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING BY -LAWS FOR SAID AGENCY.
3. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A LOAN FROM THE CITY.
4. ADJOURNMENT.
is
RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -2
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82, ACCEPTING A LOAN FROM
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE COMMUNITY RE-
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE FUND, AND AUTHORIZING
EXPENDITURES THEREFROM.
2. DESIGNATION OF CONSULTANT FOR REDEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
Because of a potential conflict with clients in another community, the original
redevelopment contractor, Envista, has asked to be released from the performing of work
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, it is recommended that Municipal Services
Inc. be employed as consultants to the city on matters relating to redevelopment.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to approve Municipal Services Inc.
as the consultant to the city for redevelopment. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
3. ADOPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT BY -LAWS.
These are guidelines for conducting operations of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency. It is a State requirement that these be established and that they conform
to State law.
Mr. Frost said that the positions of city clerk and city treasurer were elected
positions. He said perhaps some type of alternate language could be used in other
to make these positions appointed for the Redevelopment By -laws.
Mr. Crowe suggested the following language:
Section 2.1. "The Secretary of the Agency and the Treasurer of the Agency
shall be appointed by the members of the Agency and shall serve at the pleasure
of the members of the Agency."
Section 2.2. Terms of Officers. "The Agency officers shall remain
in office until replaced by a majority vote of the members of the
Agency, or until their resignation, or death. However, the Mayor
and Mayor Pro Tem shall remain officers only so long as they continue
to hold the appropriate City offices. "
Another change suggested was on page two of the by -laws, fourth paragraph to read
as follows:
"The Treasurer shall supervise the fiscal affairs of the Agency and shall
also supervise the case and custody of all monies of the Agency. The
Treasurer shall cause adequate accounts of the properties, monies, and
transactions of the Agency to be kept and maintained. The Treasurer shall
render to the Members of the Agency, a monthly treaturer's report of the
Agency's transactions and financial condition. The Treasurer shall submit
to the Members of the Agency significant information and recommendations
concerning the fiscal affairs of the Agency. The Treasurer shall also perform
all other duties incidental to the office of Treasurer.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. RA81 -1 and
to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Secretary Wasserman
read the title of Resolution No. RA81 -1.
RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY -LAWS FOR SAID AGENCY.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to appoint Lauren Wasserman as the
Agency's secretary and Harry Empey as the Agency's treasurer. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0.
Necrecary Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. RA81 -2.
RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1981 -82, ACCEPTING A LOAN FROM THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE FUND, AND AUTHORIZING
EXPENDITURES THEREFROM.
Mr. Wasserman reported that we have received certification from the Secretary
of State's office that our Ordinance establishing the Rancho Cucamonga Re-
development Agency has been received and filed.
4. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to adjourn to July 14 for a
Redevelopment Agency meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting
adjourned at 11:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Assistant Secretary
,ieNVILLIAM IYON Cccmia�r�/
9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 - 17141 9BO -2244
); PSoo.O a w.,a6*p Cc
June 17, 1981
Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O.Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730
Subject: Victoria Better Homes 5 Gardens Grand Award
Dear Lauren:
I have arranged to have an extra plaque made relative to
Victoria winning the Better Homes 5 Gardens Grand Award for
the Sensible Growth Awards.
I thought the City may have a place where they like to put
plaques and trophies and things that various groups or entities
have won for the City, as sort of a City showcase.
If that's the case, I am wondering what would be the proper
format for presenting that plaque to the City?
• Sincerely,
THE �I jLLIIA.M LYON COMPANY
GARY 1TRY
Regional Manager
Pmm
11
1
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
il a-41 �
$
COPYee..:Hmee-
ee,..rEwpi..
+OF
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC 6WFRAOE OCENSHSI
1. IT9F(SI IICENSE(S)
FILE NO.
t
To Ceps r r of AlloWk Se erage Cmnol
1215 O Snent
.I
FEE NO.
d-
!
Sall TJBTFIardinO
s« <.cf. 95311
• =•
.. •.. «...,
ON SAL, n"ER L Itl:v
EATI::G PLACE A
GECGPAPHIC.L
CODE vot. —
3515
S
The undenyned Aer.6y epp0e. lw
SC:�GR` >:
•'- ! u. de"'I d of Fdb..:
locoed
1. WeRI OF APFLICANT(S) . ,
Tmn, Pane
_....y,..'...
t. r
Ayplled ode Sec 31041 ❑
•.
DAVID, Bond. J.
. ..
flfern -Dote: 1 /1/ I
Faea Dole
Rq!YReEGi
HRIUSe MaLI1S1'J8 A.
1 TYPE(S) Of TRANSACTIONS)
FEE
LIC.
Tyre
"i.:v
•, "r .i: ..: ..
LiW ._
VS
��:fi..�
A::LI(AL
184.80
el a 'nee
Brallorm
'- .. --
vo PI
_
Loc.S.m of .si-m —Nemec oM Stf.
—
4;:j,{ ;.:
Baseline Ltd.
_
. µ.
cil .eM,T.P G?', ifo.g. 91701 SFi9'rn7.iiD
RECEIPT NO. 7 j() 19 TOTAL
5 4�_S1/
SAeo Type of Ficenu Cry Limnp :ca
R. Neil'mp Add,.. Lf 6Nermr born 51— Num1her and Seat
S=M _ r �•'
9. Hate yw e,e, been mndaed of o Felony? 10 H.I. year ever ;.I. W any el the PodJone of Me AlmAebe
1 J eeow9e Cmbol Act of n ktlom of Ithe De r pene Fe-
Imninpto 'he Act' / L:
It f.plam e'WS" onmea to items q er 10 on en arradmmr .NCb Iholl be deemed part of M;I opptc.m."
12. ApNk.ml agree (a) rAar ony m nape, emdoymd in onnole burned prom ...;II Fete ell the qu 1;pmYero of a 6umb, and
@I rbal be .ill n ';.Iola o be,:elered any of the pro-?-, of the AIIOAotc be,e,ege Control Act. _
' .1 a, [w'e .r perm:l I
10 STATE Of CALIFORNIA Coun, a1 S. 9c". .2CCS:10 Cm. 0-1A %1
Ia APPLICANT �_•(; l•` 11 w r�..� [.tylrF, w �\ ~.w.wfn - • /IlCli li.�.rL <`,Gl,. r� 'r`° -�
SIGN HEPE c �' I
ka_ .._. ......
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
I]. ]tAif Of CALIFORNIA C.unry el __ _ .. DoN .. ., ...
,r .... MF
Re
.
•our.:. n. n.a.....n .. n...., r x.A�. n rv...r...n :u ::m er .—"I mm.�� et _.:wn •. �'m ..:r ne
L I 19. lwer;an N.mbe, and Sneel -- Cry and l;y Code Co.,
_ Do NnE SVnrt Relone Thn, Lint; Foe 0,M,, fnt E'v Only
kf3'1! ' y. Y W �h � T1 T J.el ❑ f du< arY P°C 6-1 .81
x ❑ .. .._ ._COMES MAILED
4v.Lrc.: -rte.. ..w.a.... ,•� r,
0 Rwewf to of ....._Leda ORn en � a f � M', •� No
n
L�
s
I
CITY OF RA\C IO Cl,'CAAIOXG,\
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 1, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Annexation #3 to Landscape Maintenance District #1 for Parcel Map
5922 and Tract No. 10491
Attached for City Council is Resolution No. 81- declaring the Council's
intent to annex Parcel Map 5922 and Tract 10491 to the Landscape Maintenance
District and setting the date for public hearing for August 5, 1981.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council approve Resolution No. 81- declaring the
City's intent to annex Parcel Map 5922 and Tract No. 10491 to the Landscape
Maintenance Ditrict No. 1 and setting a date for public hearing August 5, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Engineer's Report for
ANNE%ATION NO. 3
to the
Landscape Maintenance District Number 1
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. General Description
This City Council has elected to annex the permanent landscaped areas along
the frontage of 19th Street of Parcel Map No. 5922 and the frontage on Victoria
Street of Tract No. 10491 into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City
Council has determined that the areas to be landscaped will have an effect upon
all lots within Parcel Nap No. 5922 and Tract No. 10491 as well as on the lots
• directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be annexed to the
district are shown on the Parcel Map and Tract Map as roadway right of way or
easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the
developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Parcel Map
No. 5922 and Tract No. 10491. The plans and specifications for the landscaping
are in conformance with the Planning Commission conditions of approval of said
Parcel. Yap No. 5922 and Tract No, 10491.
Reference ishereby made to the subject parcel map and tract map and the
assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans
and specifications by refernece are hereby made a part of this report to the
same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
SECTION 4. Estimated Costs
No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improve-
ments will be constructed by developers. Based on data from other cities, contract
analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for
assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square foot per year. These '
costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data.
SECTION 6. Estimated Costs
No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All
improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on data from other
cities, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that
maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square
foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments willl be
based on actual cost data.
The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(inlcuding Annexation No. 3 comprised of 8807 square feet of landscaped area)
is shown below:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost
$.30 X 196,256 square feet - $58,876.80
Per Lot Annual Assessment •
$58,876.80 _ 916lots - $62.28 per year
Per Lot Monthly Assessment = $5.19 per month
Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the
attached Assessment Diagram.
SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram
A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and
labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within
the test of this report.
SECTION 6. Assessment
Improvement for Annexation No. 3 is found to be of general benefit to all
lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel.
I
s
0
The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1982, to
determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred
by the City furing the 1981/82 fiscal year which are to be recovered
through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of
1972.
SECTION 7. Order of Events
I. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City
Engineer's report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District
and sets a public hearing date.
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony
and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the
• City Council
6, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing
and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments,
C J
v
n
A
i
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I
ANNEXATION NO.3
CITY OP RANCHO CUCA \fO \GA
ENGINEERING DIVISION TRACT N0.
T 10491
vlctNITV nI,�P 11 \\I
1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.]
ANNEXATION NO.3
J
•�. I .. h,' /_ ?; 51'5.7
N4,M,L rOY
f
CITY Of R;� �C110 CUCAMONGA tit I'!;
N0. 5922 TRA
E\GIXEEKING DIVISION T
VICINITY NIAP 1 \III
v :'
In I
NfNErL6VrN /srFrf Nw. 30 /—STFf_r.
—�
j�1 _ ail
14
Av
'I
PC >CCL 1 v�vCCL J "vinC:l •
n
m • w, n
• ., .
•�. I .. h,' /_ ?; 51'5.7
N4,M,L rOY
f
CITY Of R;� �C110 CUCAMONGA tit I'!;
N0. 5922 TRA
E\GIXEEKING DIVISION T
VICINITY NIAP 1 \III
v :'
RESOLUTION NO 's I- to o
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRILIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXTION NO. 3 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that:
WHEREAS, on the 1st day of July, 1981 said City Council directed
the City Engineer to ma Ke and file with the City Clerk of said City a report
in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972;
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk
of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which
report has been presented to this Council for consideration;
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and
every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is
sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should
be modified in any respect;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows:
I. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses
of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained
in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and
confirmed.
• 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and
described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within
said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
3. That the propsoed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in
said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be
received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental
expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved
and confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report of the
purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ASSENT:
ATTEST:
11 City Clerk
Cj
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. I
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING
SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION :3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I;
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME
AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division
15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does
resolve as follows:
Description of
Section I: That the public interest and convenience require and it is
the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways
and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed,
recorded subdivision tract map or recorded parcel map within the boundaries
of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said
maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any
sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting,
structures, walls, in connection with said parkways.
Location of Work
• Section 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within
roadway right of way and landscaping easement of Parcel Map No. 5922 and
Tract 10491 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly
described an a map which is on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled
"Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ".
Description of Assessment District
Section 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City
Council, is of more than (coal or ordinary public benefit, and the said
City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a
district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses
thereof, and which district is described as follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map
of Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. I" heretofore
approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. "') , indicating
by said boundary line the extent of the territory included within the proposed
assessment district and which map is on file ii the Office of the City Clerk
of said City.
Report of Ennineer
Section 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. ' !— '• has
approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount
of the proposed assessnent, the district boundary, assessment zones, detailed
description of improvements, and the method of assessment. The report titled
/✓
"Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 3, Landscape Maintenance District no. 1"
is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said
report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the •
assessments and for the extent of the work.
Collection of Assessments
Section 5: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and
in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall
file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council
will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular
meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be
determined.
Time and Place of Hearing
Section 6: Notice is hereby given that on the 5th day of August,
1981, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 9161 Base Line,
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to
the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why
said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not
be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be
in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each
signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be
delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing,
and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any
protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino
County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such
protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer •
is the owner of the property so described.
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
Section 7: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried
through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California
designated the Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Calffornia.
Publication of Resolution of Intention
Section 8: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of
the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk
shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be
published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in
The Daily Report, a newspaper Of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
�J
•
9
rrr�• nr o . nr,an r, •i^.. �,nvr,
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 1, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Change of Street Name from Mango Street to Morningstar Lane in
Tract 9583
Mango Street in Tract 9583, north of Hillside Road in the "Deer Creek" sub-
division, provides access to two unfinished houses. When extended to the
north, the street will provide access to more lots in Tract 9584, which has
not yet recorded.
The developers wish to name the street in Tract 9584 Morningstar Lane,
which would be more in keeping with the names of the rest of the streets in
the remainder of the Beer Creek development. The owners of the two proper-
ties in Tract 9583 have agreed to the change from Mango to Morningstar, thus
enabling the extension as Morningstar into Tract 9584. The change would also
conform to the recently adopted street naming ordinance in not continuing
a name along discontinuous streets (Mango was used well to the south, below
19th Street).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution changing
the name of Mango Street in Tract 9583 to Morningstar Lane.
Respectfully submitted,
LBHi�jaa
Attachments
0
F:
title;
G' CITI' OF ItA NCI IO Cl'CA \IO \GA /�� -rR 9583
ENGINEERING DIVISION'
- tiw �T - --
\'ICINrrti' ,\I:\r vise Ut
J��
RESOLUTION NO. �1 -loa
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME OF MANGO STREET WITHIN TRACT 9583
TO MORNINGSTAR LANE
WHEREAS, the street currently named "Mango Street" within Tract
9583, north of Hillside Road, contains two future residences, and
WHEREAS, the affected property owners wish to change the name
of said Mango Street to "Morningstar Lane ",
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby designate "Mango Street" within Tract 9583,
north of Hillside Road, to be henceforth known as "Morningstar Lane ".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be directed to forward
a copy of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors, County of San Bernar-
dino as set forth in Section 34092 of the Government Code, of the State of
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED THIS 1st day of July, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Luaren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
0
)-I
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
•
9
CITY OF RA\CI-10 CUCA`10NC,\
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 1, 1981 u
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of North Town Street and Drainage Improvement Phase II
on June 24, 1981 bids were received on the North Town Phase II Project. The
low bidder was Schramm 8 Walters Contractors, Inc. at $106,713.45. The
Engineer's Estimate for the project $123,200.00. The Staff has analyzed the
bids and finds them correct and acceptable. The low bidder, Schramm 8 Walters
was 13% below the Engineer's Estimate. A summary of all bids is attached.
REC01M1ENDATION
It is recommended that the Council award the contract to Schramm 8 Walters
Contractors, Inc. at $106,713.45, authorize execution of the contract.
Respectfully sn`mitted,
6�/7w A "-`
LSH:jaa
Attachments
I�
V CITY OF PO SALS OPENED
PROJECT NORTH TCA STREET IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I
LOCATION MAIM eTRFFT Rein AVFNIIFr Frgnu Nnm rvmn
DATE JUMP 24. 1981
CDNTRACT NO.
L
•
•
Schramm 6 Walters
La May 6 Son, Inc.
Cat Vac Danst, Co.
Irvlostrial Fence
Riverside (ons v.CO.
Fl-ir, Eng inecring
ITEMS
QUANTITIES
OID 7+IIOU:a
0111 fJ!Ob.'li
BID
-MOUNT
Blp
RIpIMi
BID
ONOUf1T
8[0
N40UFlt
_ Bidder_s Bond
I.
A.C. removal (including
12,063
SF
1.50
14,475.60
.39
4.704.57
1.50
IB,094.50
27
3.257.01
.30
3.618.90
.40
4,815.20
sa� cutting and A.C. berms)
2.
P.C.C.curb and gutter per
3.762
LF
5.20
19,562.40
6.00
22,572.DO
5.80
21,819.60
6.70
25.105.40
7 -75
29,155.50
9.00
33,858.00
Standard No. 302
3.
P.C.C. sida.alk per St.orl
17,647
SF
1.22
21,529.34
1.35
23.823.45
1.30
22,940.10
1.40
24,705.60
1.70
1.80
31,764.60
No. 310
(29.999.90
4.
A.C. paving
352
Ton
46.00
16,192.00
54.56
19.205.12
32.00
11,264.00
69.85
24,587 -20
51.00
17,952.00
33.00
11,616.00
S.
P.C.C. drive approach Per
6,468
SF
1.75
11,319.00
1.90
12,289.20
1.80
11,642.40
1.90
12,289.20
3.15
20.374.20
2.00
12.936.00
Standard No. 305
I
6.
P.C.C. alley approach
573
5F
1.95
1,117.35
3.05
1,747.65
3.00
1,719.00
3.30
1,896.90
3.25
1,862.25
2.25
1,289.25
including integral curb
only per ScaMard No. 307
7.
A.C. berm per plan
158
LF
5.50
869.00
4.80
758.40
4.00
632.00
5.50
B69.Oo
1.80
284.40
2.50
395.00
8.
A.C. drainage Swale per pla
256
SF
1.00
256.oD
1.20
307.20
2.00
512.00
1.92
419.52
2.00
512.00
2.00
512.00
9
Type "L" or Type "R" or
7
EA
35.00
245.00
22.00
154.00
15.00
105.00
25.00
175.00
30.00
110.00
75.00
525.00
Type 'NP' markers per plan
per standard Na. 403
10.
Raising mantles to grade
I
EA
425.00
425.00
200.00
200.00
500.00
500.00
200.00
200.00
;80.00
180.00
350.00
350.00
51
40.00 11800.00
12.
Catch basin per Standard
EA
1965.00
1,965 -00
1950.00
11950.00
1,800.00
2150.00
2,150.00
1150.00
1,1050.00
2000.110
2,000.00
No. 503, W -6.4, V-3.1
I
L
•
•
CITY OF PV CUCAMONGA PAGE 2 of 4 •
ko SUMl4RY CF PR SAILS OPENED
PROJECT NORTH TOWN STREET IMPROVEME14TS PHASE 11
DATE - JUNE 24. 1981
LOCATION MAIN STREET. RE10 AVENUE, FE MN BOUELVARO CONTRACT NO.
ITEMS
CHANT IT IES
BrMr u ILZiL
I-Kay . _Icre�
Ca ttra_ Coq st {, [C
_I n1 r.1 Gerce_.
R_IVr_rs id e F,.t,
Flaring E_ngincering
BID
MOUNT
BID
14W1R1T
010 RID @R
010 WOUNT
BID Al TMtR
810 I RuUNT
Bidder's Band
_
13i
C- Standard
_
I
EA
tcb basin per
2738.00
2,738.00
32oD.00
3,200.00
2000.00
2,000.DO
2500.00
2,500.00
2100.00
2,100.00
3000.00
3,000.00
w. 503. W 6.4, V-3.0
14
P.C.C. cross gutter and
920
SF
2.50
2,300.00
3.55
3.266.00
3.00
2,760.DO
3..56
3,27520
3.6D
3,312.00
3.25
2,990.00
s"Mrel including integral
curb per Steward No. 308
15
P.C.C. driveway transition
1108
SF
1.22
1.351.76
1.40
11551.20
1.80
1,994.40
1.40
1,551.20
1.70
1,883.60
2.10
2,326.80
per Plan
16
Asphalt concrete drive. y
5858
SF
.80
4,686.40
.BD
4,868.40
1.00
5.858.00
1.37
B4O25.46
1.10
6,443.80
1.95
11.423.10
transitionspe, Plan
17
P.C.C. ro11M curb and
49
LF
5.40
264.60
7.40
362.60
6.00
294.DO
6.70
328.30
8.00
392.00
7.00
343.00
gutter per plan
18
street barricade per
1
EA,
1200.00
1,200.00
1160.00
1,160.00
500.00
500.00
700.00
7DO.0D
6o0.0o
680.00
1500.00
1,500.00
Standard No. 404
19
Relocate all boxes and
32
EA
45.00
1,440.00
9.37
299.84
50.00
1,600.00
55.00
1,760.00
25.00
B00.00
100.00
3,200.00
street signs
20
Renove existing 12" but
4
EA
19D.OD
760.00
1.50
600.00
250.00
1,000.00
325.00
1,300.00
125.001
500.00
150.00
600.0)
less than 36" stump
21
Remve existing 18" and
3
EA
29D.00
870.00
5.75
1,725.00
500.00
1,500.00
37500
1 125.00
525.001
1,575.00
400.00
1,200.00
larger trees including
stump
TOTALS
106,713.45
107,622.63
110,576.00
120,394.19
124,945 -55
129,203.95
•
L
L
t�
CITE HO CUCAMONGA
SU"RY OPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT HORTN TOVH STREET M1Vp DRgINAGE IMYROV EMENTS PIIASE 11
LOC. T101 MAIN STREET. REED AVENUE. FERON 8WLEVARO
PAGE 3 of 4 a
DATE JUNE 24, 1981
CONTRA[T N0.
ITEMS
QUANTITIES
Kroger- McGrew Cans[
Dmmo Construction
Laird Construction
Frontier Concrete _
Din. Construction
BIB
ARIOuo
BIU 1
A�100lIT
17111
N10Uai
BIO mouNT
BID AMDDOT
010 ViOUNT
Bidder's
1. A.C. rt oval (inclodiml
12,063
SF
4
5,790.24
1.25
15,078.75
1.70
20,507.10
.77
9,288.5E
1.70
20,50710
w wtt in9 And A.C. be rnz3
Z. P.C.C.curb and ,.1l., ver
3,762
LF
8.3E
31,224.60
7.00
26,334.00
6.90
25.957.80
9.00
33.858.00
11.50
43, 263.0D
5[ar.JarJ Ib. 302
3. P.C.C. sldeoa1R per Bandar
17,647
Sr
1.5
27.352.85
1.55
27.352.85
1.40
24,705.80
1.90
33.52930
2.20
38,823.40
No. 310
4. A.C. Paring
352
on
61.8
21,771.20
4500
15.840.0
96.00
33,792.00
60.00
21,120.00
125.00
44,000.00
5. P.E.C. Iri:c a; : 1,n acn per
6,468.
SF
2.2
14,553.00
2.55
16.493.40
2. 00
12,936.00
3.80
24,578.40
2.50
16,170.00
SWndald tu. 305
6. P.C.C. alley
573
SF
3.2
1,862.25
3.00
1,719.00
3.70
2,120.10
4.0
2,292.00
3.50
2,005.50
Deluding ee,ral cur4
only per Standard No. 307
7. A.C. 4arm per plan
158
LF
6.0
348.00
8.00
1,264.00
7.0
1,106.00
7.00
1,106.00
6.50
I,D27.00
8. A.C. drainage rate per pla
256
SF
1.2
307.10
2500
6,400.00
..90
486.40
4.00
1,024.00
2.50
640.00
9. Type "L" or Tape 'R" a1
7
EA
35.0
245.00
25.00
175.00
30.00
210.00
150.00
1,1,50.00
50.00
350.00
Tine "P' ,r4crz per plan
Per Standard N;. 403
0. Raisin,- antulo to grade
I
EA
530.01
500.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
400.00
4o0.OD
250.00
250.00
I. 1d'• R.C.P.
51
LG
70.0
3.570.00
75.00
3.825.00
60.00
3,060.00
95.0
4,845.00
60.00
3,060.00
2. Caecn basin per Standard
I
E
250.00
2,5m. 00
2260.00
2,260.00
1800.00
11800.00
3000.0
3,000.00
200.00
2,000.00
w. 503, v =6.4, v =JJ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PACE 4 of 4
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT NORTH TOWN STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPRDVEMENTS PHASE 11 DATE junt
LOCATION HAIN STREET REID AVENUE FERON MWLEVARD - CONTRACT HO.
•
a
r -M row Caost
Ona tugL' -on
ui o Lwctin
lt➢ tier_tancre Ce_
9$L9 _G4 8ru"Aion --
ITEMS
QUANTITIES
BID
AMOUNT
_Damn
BID
AMOUNT
BID AMOUNT
BID AMOUNT
BID APDNT
BIO
AMCUIiT
13!
Catch Basin per Standard
1
EA
3700.00
3,700.00
2925.00
2,92500
2400.00
2,400.00
3000.00
3,000.00
2000.00
2,000.00
No. 533. W -6.4, V =3.0
14
P.C.C. cr S .. nutter and
920
SF
3.20
2.944.00
3.50
3.220.00
3.70
3.404.00
5.00
4,110.00
4.50
4,140.OD
Pant: cl tand Ji i e'Irvl
curb
rB per Sta rW and d W. 30
15
P.C.C. drivruay transitions
1108
SF
3.25
3.601.00
2.55
2,825.40
2.00
2,216.00
4.00
4,432.00
2.70
2,991.60
Per Plan
16
Asphalt concrete Jrivewy
5858
SF
2.35
13.766.30
1.85
ID,8373D
2,00
11,716.00
3.00
17,474.00
2.00
11,716.00
transitions ... Plan
17
P.C.C. rS11N curb and
49
LF
5,00
24500
10.00
490.00
6.90
3,381.00
15,0
73500
9.30
455.70
'utter per Plan
18
Strcea barricade or
1
EA
500.00
500.00
500.0
500.00
1200.OD
1,200.00
300.0
300.OD
2000,00
2,000.00
StanJard N,. 404
19
Relocate mail bones and
32
EA
60.00
1,920.00
25.00
800.00
20.00
640.00
6400.0
6,400.00
20.00
640.00
sane[ siy ns
20
No xi st ing 12" but
4
EA
250,00
1,000.00
100.00
400.00
75.00
300.00
250.0
1,000.00
405.00
1,620.00
1.11 tnsn 3b" sLOmP
21
e- uvu Wier itq 18" and
3
EA
300.00
900.00
350,00
1,050.00
500,00
1,500.00
350,0
1,050.00
40500
1,215.00
Iv r trees incluJ i,g
std =v
TOTALS
139.200.64
140,089.70
150,695.30
175.287.21
198,874.30
•
a
•
.-2
CITY Or RANCI-10 CUCtVNI0 \CA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 1, 1981 UII `
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 6103, Agreements and Security - New West
The subject map received tentative approval from the Planning Commission on
August 13, 1980 for the division of 1.9 acres of lane, into 3 parcels within
the R -1 -2000 zone located on the east side of Mayberry Avenue between Wilson
Avenue and Rancho Street.
To guarantee the installation of off -site improvements the subdivider, New
West, has submitted an agreement and bonds in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance $4000.00
Labor & Material $2000.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
Parcel Map 6103 and accept the bonds and agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
;0
0
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO96130
/N rw! G /T✓ OF 1leM. IIUMU ✓bA
CL/Nb A 011/1/11 pf MELLL 111 -11111 MAI Nl 1111. /N TNF 1111 pf SAN GFRNAROiNO,
S/a TL O/ Ca[ /FOFw�A, 4S aE/ /[r1T R OROFO /.v COOT 36, /AO! /I Of c.I.f[!C M1K
MAYEL /9!p
• . Lp -o1]
•
fA CN ffLZLfr cus/uEEE
Cf' SRNp . WOIN / rIS(0.'
155
151] 1 Arrbw 111, r >f, SUi >E N'
I
ti� .t1NCMO CUG16Vb4, G 91190
SIiI
i` I PM.w /n l9Ep/A //
%RING /NN f.I ✓ +bC
-- -
11.1fA,G
: -_�� 16 pb NW CASCAeE
� -
"�- ". -�. E.IST WENATCNEf. N.fSN ISSb/
rnI
/
I �3C
-- -
vAG C / mN w rrrufrl
N411OW
e s3 1 r . _ 1115 t1 f f!/ //t
,
el
iq
8
UT /L /r /ES
`
PAref[ t w +>< c/rc +NwNSA mvvfr .-+r a o/nricr
rovr Ew ua. oINU loiraw
bC1161 -AC1 e
IV OIS IL \ w x bAS SOUT GIIIOR /A eA5 GO
MI
OfEl4t TEIePNpuG
Mx
Erit1 Nb
PA lrf[ J 1CREAb F- I f3 ORO i3 /NET
HAP 111
.
• . Lp -o1]
•
. CITY OF RANCHO CUCWIONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREDUT
FOR
PARCEL MAP NO. 6103
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered
Into, in confo nuance with the provisions of the tbnicipal Code and Regulations
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and
erelnatter referred to as the Developer
VITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the
City of Parcel Map Number 6103 in accordance with the
provisions of the report of the City Engineer thereon, and any amendments
thereto; located on the east side of Mayberry Avenue, north of Wilson Avenue.
and,
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said Dev-
eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent tc prior completion of said requirements for the pupose of securing
said approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer
as fol laws:
is 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all
improvements described on Pa e 3 hereof within nine months from the
date hereof, as per Section 2.12 of Ordinance No. 28,
0
2. The tern of this agreement shall be nine months commencing on the date
Of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on
the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tern
has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the pro-
visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to
the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity
for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards,
cost estirate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
a. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions
to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said
Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing.
S. Encroachment pemlts shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of
the City Engineer prier to start of any work within the public right of way,
and the Developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the re.
gulations Contained therein. Ilan - compliance may result in stopping of the
work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided.
6. Public right of way improvement work required shall be constructed in can -
fomance %nth approved improvement plans. Standard Specifications, and
Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shalt
I elude any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for
drainage or public safety.
RCC12,A
1t-
Cm' of E9N61!o 6L'CSMO:Gn •
6OISTIRUCTLOI IND 901:D ESTCL\TC
ENCROACUMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(\¢nrh to "Inspector's Copy")
DATE: 619/81 PERMIT NO. COMPUTED BY d. Stafa. Jr,
Fiic Reference Parcel Map 6103 City Jvvin3 No.s
NOTE: Does nut include current fee far vrili,, p ..it nr paverent repince-
ment deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM QUANTITY
UNIT
DVi In'
5
erS nn I\ n'pC.
L.f.
F" P \onnwc'n I 612
E.F.
A ' ^.C,, : uurr I
S. F.
wt n >.wvnn an 1
n r at mn e[ 8uM1 r 1
S.F.
y
A.: I1D11 sl
.\ .,. 1900 .'00^, e'
TON
A." \90 [ 0, ton
TON
7,1N
.bi r C.- to G11-1 M
-\�
Fa.
Ad1 �•. � r c, �aee
c s'
\emva
of PCC Curb
248
Repair Damaged are
=6.
Sar cu[ a
16
I
1
C�?
CO1STR'=ITON COST 13,354
CO::II!:LFNCY COSTS _ t 94A
TOI. \L CO;IUUR('C,TIO:1 COSTS S4 000
F, \11!1.-:'1. PlRF0e.9d`:CF. RONN (100' :1 54,000
LAMO:, d %ll LA1'ilU pl. M1:11 (MI:) $2,000
F. \G ❑:1'!:R INh M1:SPIIC.T[OS FEE S 200
(FEE S11U)U'LF.)
yn'r •E;; l.vv EO::p (ra sn) 51.350
•
•
I
Page 2
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple_
tion: the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the
event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cast and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
means.
6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re-
moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and
other debris from the public right of way resulting from work done on
the adjacent property or within said right of way,
70. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement
security shall be not less than the amount shown below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED:
Faithful performance Bond
Material and Labor Bond
$4,000
$2,000
IN WITNFSS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law an the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
DFVEELL"PFR
BY:..L .%= I- BATE:
BY:
DATE:_
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
BY:_
ATTEST:_
OAT
CLERK
•mN�r,��r„
llii rme Ivsunnrvce
•r. \rr rlrvl \I II m0. \I.\ 1
e�
1; r, �ry nr San RO rna nlino j w
June 22, I0d1
Khr < m
S nn,
r�' mnar Morris D. Shalf, L
01 unJe r•r. n eJ.. \,N \rY ru Nn. ,n anJ I�rt .a,J
Lm•,
u n c vre i
n,l
Vne
nl . ....I
�
J men n, M1.11 i, ,.r ry�r nYrlrer � m,J anJ
��r�
.w
�� O'fICIAL SEAL
1 .n.,.ra �.�re.e,r •, mr n•rv. r... ..r. r....e.e�m
sF':.I LA S'T_V_NS `(
xranrmrl h -a ma,�n,�n v.I
ar !I
CLERK
Premium 580.00
Bond No. 102801
•
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OOND
b'HEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and SHAFFER 6 SONS, INC.
(hereinafter designated as "principal") have entered into a
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated 19 , and identified as
project r e
is hereby referred to and matle a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and
_I1EYF1DPFRS tNSN RAN[F COMPANY , as surety, are held and
firmly bound un co the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
"City "), in the seal sum of
---- ---------------------
e - -- DOIlerO ($ goO�U_p0 ) iaw.fyi
money a the unit States, for the payment f vh ich sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
f bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, •
/ successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi-
eaons and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration
thereof node as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the tire and in the manner therein spec-
, ifred, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and effect.
Asa part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
osts and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's Esea, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec -
i.'icatiens accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its
oblinations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any
such Change , of extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF', this instrument has been duly executed
by
RFe principal and surety above med, on June 22
-
//n /a
OEMOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
.
m+ Ga LaII -1
thanes
ry �NC Attorney -In-Feet
C'�
0
Premium Included
Bond Ho. 102801
LABOR AND :ATCRIALMEN BOND
Wi1nREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and SHAEFER A SONS INC
(hereinafter designated as "principal') have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated 19 _, and identified as pro-
ject pacce] wn 6113
is hereby cafe ire to an made a part ereo antl,
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file
a good and sufficient payment band with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(COrmencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the
Civil Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of two thousand ------------------ --- ----- -- ------- --- ---------
___ __ _________ __ __________ Dollar s 2.000.00
or mater als
urms.e or abor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under
• the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor,
that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought
upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 1062) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall he
and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in
anv mduner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here-
by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad-
- dition.
IN WIT::LSS WHER£OP, this instrument has been duly extruter
by the principal dad surety above named, on June 22
P rl nnpal
DEVELOPERS INSURANCE rItPANY _
Suret'
mfhames Ge,y NcCall f At rner -In -ra C[
RESOLUTION NO. 'r,/ -/c3
. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6103,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6103) IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6103, submitted by New
West Subdivider, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the east side
of Mayberry between Wilson and Rancho, being a division of parcel 4 of
Parcel Map 3574 as recorded in Book 36 Page 18 of Parcel Maps was approved
by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act
and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City;
and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6103 is the Final Map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said
Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated
thereon;
MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows;
1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating
• same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to
execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and,
2. That said Parcel Map Number 6103 be and the same is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
present same to the County Recorder to be filed for
record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
19 Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
o� 7
•
D
STAFF REPORT v
DATE: July 1, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY, Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement from Randall and Cheryl Ward, husband and wife
as joint tenants for 8153 La Senda Road
As a prerequisite to issuance of a building permit for 8153 La Senda Road,
a private road located on the west side of Sapphire Street between Almond
Street and Hillside Road, the installations of street improvements includ-
ing, but not limited to curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk and drive
approach are required.
Mr. and Mrs. Ward have entered into a Lien Agreement forthe installation
of said curbs, gutter, pavement, sidewalk and drive approach because immediate
construction is not necessary for public safety and welfare.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the Lien Agreement on
behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
i
LB
Attachments
C��
0
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
and
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA
9320-C Base Line Road
Post office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
1981, by and between Randall L. and Cheryl L.
Ward. Husband and Wife as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as
"Developer -), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "1, provides as follows:
WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of
a building permit for residential development, the City requires the
construction of missing off -site street improvements, including curbs,
gutters, sidewalk, pavement, street lights, adjacent to the property
• to be developed; and,
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of
such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided
that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer
to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after
demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide
that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails
or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real
property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance
and any repsymont due City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE:
The Developer herrby agrees that they will install Off-
sv.o improvements, incbadinq curbs, qutters, si'_o walk, pavement,
streec li =:h cs, in accordance and co mplia nee with all applicable ordinance::.
resoiutio ns, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time
Of the installation. Said imprn vem nets shall be instal L,d upon and
alarm Lo Senda Pnad, id)ac^nt to Developer's property hereinafter
descrtb,,, .
yr'
2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed
not later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer
from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of
said improvements shall be at no expense to the City.
1. In the event the Develop" fails or refuses to complete
the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at
any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its
intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and
complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred
by the City from the Developer.
4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms
and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City
of any funds which may he expended by City in completing said improvements
upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these
presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following
described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, •
County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit:
Parcel 1, Parcel Map 4780, being a portion of Lot 10,
Block 21, Cucamonga Homestead Association, as recorded
in Book 6 of Naps, Page 46, Records of said County.
(AIN 1061 - 101 -2])
S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes
described above.
6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully
perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this
Agrvarant, than this conveyance shall be void; otherwise, it shall
remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered
and eroated as a nortgage on the real property and the rights and
o:;l icalrn c:: of the part,au with rai:,oat thereto shall be governed by
the provisicas of tho Civil Coda of the State of California, and any
other applicable, statute, pertaining to nortgaans oa teal property.
]. This Agrcement shall be binding upon and shall insure
to the benefit of the heirs, executors, sdmrnistrators, successors and
asslg's of each O: the parties herelC.
71
• R. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement
as a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall mean "mortgagor" and the
City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil
Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to
mortgages on real property.
9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is
entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the
right of the Developer to redeem the above- described property from the
mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be
awarded by the Court.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the day and year first above written.
CITY: DEVELOPER:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
• CALIFORNIA, a municipal
corporation
BY:
PP.I LLIP D. SCNLOSSER
Mayor "
9
ATTEST:
LAUREN M. WASSERMAN
City Clerx
3►
. RESOLUTION NO. �11- /''
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM
RANDALL AND CHERYL WARD, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS
JOINT TENANTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME.
WHEREAS, Installation of curbs, gutters, pavement, sidewalk
and drive approach established as prerequisite to issuance of Building
Permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract
and Lien Agreement by Randall and Cheryl Ward, Husband and Wife as
Joint Tenants for 8153 La Senda Road, located on the west side of
Sapphire Street, between Almond Street and Hillside Road;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in
the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1981.
• AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
�n
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
0
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA
NIEVIORANDUM
DATE: July 1, 1981
TO: Harry Empey, Director of Finance
FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement officer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T.O.P. BOND FOR THE GOEDEN COMPANY
Work for the following tract has been completed and the 9urantee bond
is hereby authorized by the Planning Division for release to The Goeden
Company, 17702 Cowan Street, Irvine, California 92714.
Tract No. Lot No. Amount of Bond Receipt No. Purpose/
Location
9569 36 $2,000 9SM 553 763 Sales Office/
Garage conver-
9569 1 d 13 $ 500 70 -400 sion and sub-
division sign
on lot no. 36.
Thank you for your assistance; if you have any questions regarding this
bond release, please call.
GWR:cd
0
KI
01
CITY OF RA1C1 -10 CCG�10 \GA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 1, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds
Tract 9472 - Located on the north side of 19th Street west of Haven Avenue
OWNER: Boulevard Development
777 South Main Street, Suite 106
Orange, California
Performance Bond (Landscaping) 32,500.00
The landscaping and irrigation has been installed in accordance with the
approved plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept said
improvements.
Respectfully submitted,
as
lam/
ORDINANCE NO. jj?
. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
207 - 191 -31 AND 40 FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF 84 CONDOMINIUMS ON 9.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BAKER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
• herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessors Parcel No. 207- 191 -31 and 40 are hereby zoned
to R- 3 /P.D. (multiple family /planned development).
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren rise rman, y er
-7/
•
0
CITY OF 12A\C110 Cl.'CAA10 \CA
SIAFF REPORT
O
fe
1977
DATE: July 1, 1981
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
NO. 80 -03 - RLS ASSOCIATES - A change of zone from
A -1 Limited Agricu ture to R -2 -PD (Multiple Family
Planned Development) for 4.55 acres of land located
on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church
Street and Base Line Road for the development of 28
condominiums - APN 208- 061 -03
ABSTRACT_ The Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 27, 1981,
held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above- described
project. After review of the Staff recommendation and conclusion of
the public hearing, the Planning Commission has recommended the adoption
of the change of zone to allow for the development requested. The
Planning Commission at this meeting, also adopted a Resolution approving
the tract map for this development with conditions of approval, pending
the approval of the zone change by the City Council. Attached is a
copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report of May 27, 1981, which
fully describes the project.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and all other related
City Ordinances. There was no opposition voiced on the project during
the course of the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Please
find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 81 -59
which recommends the approval of the requested change of zone. A pro-
posed Ordinance for the change of zone is attached for your review and
consideration.
CORRESPONDENCE. A public hearing notice was published in the Daily
Report newspaper and notices have been mailed to property owners
within 300 feet of the project boundaries. To date, no correspondence
either for or against this project has been received.
Environmental Assessment /Planned Development 80 -03
City Council •
July 1, 1981
Page Two
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the
attached Ordinance to approve Planned Development No. 80 -03.
Attachments: Proposed Ordinance
Resolution No. 81 -59
Planning Commission Staff Report of May 27, 1981
0
Cl
?7
/ C,
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -59
• A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -03 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN
THE ZONING FROM A -1 TO R- 2 -P.D. FOR 4.55 ACRES
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER, BETWEEN
CHURCH AND BASE LINE. APN 208- 061 -03.
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of August, 1980, an application was
filed and accepted on the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1981, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following findings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted
in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding area;
2. The proposed zone change would not have significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties;
and
• 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the
existing and proposed General Plan.
CJ
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the
environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on May 27, 1981,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California
Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
27th day of May, 1981, Planned Development No. 80 -03.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -03.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall
be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981.
PLANNING CO'.!MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
AT;
J L
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Tol stay, King, Sceranka, Dahl
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
3`
•
U
0
-- — CITY OF RA \G 10 CU C( MGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 27, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -03
(TENTATIVE TRACT 11610) - R.L.S. ASSOCIATES - A planned
residential development on 4.55 acres of land consisting
of 28 dwelling units in the A -1 zone (R- 2 -P.D. pendina)
and being divided by Tentative Tract No. 11610 into 28
condominium units (one lot) located on the west side of
Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road -
APN 208- 061 -03
SBSTRACT: The above- described project has been reviewed by the Growth
Management and Design Review Committees and has successfully attained
the necessary points for consideration by the Planning Commission.
Staff has prepared the recommended conditions of approval and a detailed
analysis of the project. Please find attached a Resolution of approval
with conditions for the Tentative Tract and a Resolution recommending
approval of the Planned Development designation to the City Council for
your review and consideration.
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval for the development
of a planned residential development on approximately 5 acres of land
located on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street and
Base Line Road (Exhibit "A "). The project is designed as a planned
development consisting of 28 dwelling units, enclosed garages, private
patios, and common open space areas. The site is presently zoned A -1
and is occupied by an unmaintained citrus grove. Surrounding devel-
opment consists mainly of single family residential development with
undeveloped land to the north and west. The project site and the sur-
rounding undeveloped area to the north and west is General Planned for
residential development at 4 -8 dwelling units per acre. This project
proposes a density of approximately 6 units per acre.
The project has been reviewed and rated by both the Growth Management
and Design Review Committees and has successfully gained the minimum
threshold necessary for consideration by the Planninq Commission.
Jir
Environmental Assessment /Planned Development 80 -03
May 27, 1981 .
Pape 2
ANALYSIS: The project, as presently proposed and with thz conditions
recommended by Staff, will be developed in accordance with the State
Subdivision Map Act, the City Subdivision Ordinance, and the Zoning
Ordinance. As was previously mentioned, this is a planned development
with common open space usable by project owners. All dwelling units
meet the building setback requirements along the street frontages and
are set back a minimum of 25 feet to adjacent property lines and to the
south and west. All units are provided with an enclosed 2 -car garage
and private patio areas. The dwellings are placed either as 2 attached
dwelling units or a 4 -plex combination. The project does not propose
any perimeter walls either along Turner Avenue or the proposed street.
Access to the project will be Provided from a proposed street off of
Turner Avenue. Private cul -de -sacs have been created to serve for
appropriate turning radii for fire protection equipment and provide
additional landscaping and parking areas. Each of the dwelling units
are also provided with a 20 foot minimum driveway apron in front of
each of the garages.
The Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan has been reviewed by the
Grading Committee and has been approved subject to the approval of '
the final Grading Plan. The project will be utilizing a combination
of underground storm drains along the southern boundary of the project
and proposed streets to drain the water to Turner Avenue. Adeouate
flood protection measures are recommended by the City Engineer that
could take the form of increased curb heights, flash walls, and mounding.
A significant portion of the site, more than 50 %, is proposed to be
open landscaped areas.. The Turner Avenue frontage will not be walled,
but rather provided with mounding and appropriate landscaping. The
Site Plans presently indicate a curb - adjacent sidewalk and, after dis-
cussion with the City Engineer, we recommend that a meandering sidewalk
be utilized in combination with the mounding. In order to meet the
secondary access requirements required by the Fire District, a turf -
block fire lane is proposed along the southeastern corner of the project.
In recent discussions with the Fire District, we have found that using
compacted decomposed granite with 6 inches of native soil on too and
planted with grass, is acceptable to the Fire District for a fire lane.
Therefore, it is recommended that in lieu of the turf -block proposed,
decomposed grantite or other acceptable material required by the Fire
District be used and compacted to acceptable levels.
:li
•
0
Environmental Assessment /PD 80 -03
May 27, 1981
Page 3
The Design Review Committee has reviewed the proposed desions of the
Project and has found them compatible with adjacent proposed devel-
opment. As details of the recreation building and pool area have not
been submitted, the Design Review Committee recommended approval of
these areas in concept only and that details of this area and the
buildina be provided for review and approval prior to issuance of
building permits for this project. The attached elevations portray
one and two story buildings consisting of exterior materials such as
heavy textured stucco, cedar nrooved siding, wood trim, plant -ons, and
architectural 70 asphalt shingles. Detailed colored elevations of
these buildings will be provided for review by the Commission.
Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant.
Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investi-
gation to determine potential significant adverse impacts upon the
environment. After completion of such study, Staff has found no sig-
nificant adverse impacts upon the environment as a result of this pro-
ject and, therefore, recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
CORRESPONDENCE: This project has been advertised in the Daily Report
newspaper as a public hearina item and property owners within 300 feet
of the project boundaries were notified by mail of the hearino. To date,
no correspondence has been received regarding this project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
a public hearing to consider public input on the project and all of its
elements. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the
findings and conditions of approval recommended, then adoption of the
attached Resolutions would be appropriate.
Resgectfully� submitted,
�prr
BARRY. I
ity(�lam
BKH V: jr
Attachments: Exhibit. "A" -
Exhibit "8" -
Exhibit "C" -
Exhibit "0" -
Exhibit "E" &
Exhibit "0" -
Exhibit "H" -
Initial Study
Resolution of
Resolution of
Location Map
Detailed Site Plan
Illustrative Site Plan
Project Perspective
"F" - Building Elevations
Floor Plans
Conceptual Street Alignment
Part I
Approval for Tentative Tract 11610
Aoproval for PD 80 -03
q),
mac
no scale
NO RI'I I
CITY OF pD. to-O-,-
RANCHO C U C A M O N G A TITLE A I O ION MAP
PL NNI\'G DIVISION ezun;n': A scm.I; -Lj
43
a
PROJECT DATA
ene d.11
TbOid datft
d.14
Pl�,olqd-
7- B-4
A
DETAILED SITE PLAN
11
PRDJZCT DATA
building d.te
WON d.t.
0
7j
-INAL
a
4b •
6
0
MMT"
rur
I L D I N G TYPE "A-2"
0
BUILDING TYPE "B-2"
Dx
O
4
•
On
I..,
BUILDING TYPE "B-4"
0 . •
I
MDR men
IA
A45M
UR. M.C.R. L.R.
W1.1 l?.e.c.1-1 !�-q-
N
.t H
I.R. E.R. LF LN R. L.R. TE
�77 -1 -
LA
------ -----
10 �g
00
E:, - - F, K
BUILDING TYPE "A-2" .2- BUILDING TYPE "13-4"
• a qv
1 1
�w
3
II
II lcnr -�akA pvCVJE
l�
r�_ IT i +
illj Tana w' Y
I— 1 311
t I
9cn
S A n
TJKNER Av ENIjE
f
aRKr ++ra
TUK
r
,
m
ee+.7eNrcr
ConceOtual Street Alignment Plan
TFl0=A.R M HARRIS, A.I.A..
T Q O T
ILLS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
,
Loa Gatos ,California
, „ , ,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $60.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaraticn will be
filed, e) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project. 0
PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract #11 110
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
RLS Ac"ciate„ Inc.
30� Ganatn9a Ave.. L,n: Gato„ CA p509n Ignq) ,95q_crp1
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: .J.NA. N'il inn, 397 North Fec,nd Ave.
Upland, CA 9176= (714) ?85 -0935
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
T, rne- Ave. �/n F a=eline Ave., Qanchn Cucamon--a, CA
AP= 7n ?- n "1 -n9
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
Nine
- I -I
. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Planned Communiti Cevelnnment
con =i;tinn of P9 ''nit-, - one and tvo -tory tuildinns
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4.FF Acre gross
43,DF0 S.P, of oroonsed tuildin
E
T- 2
�a
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON1-2NTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORA.ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANI,MALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
The <ite i - -c •rrently vacant, surrounded tv simle Family
dvetlini, on the 4aith and East, vacant on West, and ^everal
huildinns on the Nyrth =ide includinn sirnle family dvellinn,
eruioment sheds and a former viner', which dates to ago-,t 1'04.
_
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
Nn
E
T- 2
�a
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
1. Create a substantial change in ground •
contours?
CX 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
_ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? Grove
_ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
removal of a deteriorated nranie grove
IMPORTA ^.Tr: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee. n
Date 'p�2��KU Signature Lf/h?((l / {� /�.L U-p—,
Title JP C;& /776P)67
J
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -60
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11610
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11610, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by R.L.S. Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as 4.55 acres located on
the west side of Turner, between Church and Base Line into 1 lot,
regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and
action on May 27, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11610 and the Map thereof:
• (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the •
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11610, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION:
1. The secondary emergency access shall be constructed of
compacted decomposed granite and covered with 6 inches of
native soil and planted with grass.
2. Designs and details of the pool area and recreation
building shall be submitted to and approved by the City
Planner prior to issuance of building permits. This area
shall also include a childrens play area.
3. C.C.B R's shall be prepared for this project and shall
include a clarification that the five lane must be kept
free and clear at all times.
ENGINEERING DIVISION:
3. A parcel map for the entire recognized parcel proposed to
be divided shall be submitted for approval and shall be
recorded prior to recordation of this tentative map or •
issuance of any permit for the project, whichever comes
first.
4. Any applicable portion of the conditions of approval for
the above - mentioned parcel map shall also apply to this
project.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Richard Dahl Chairman
ATTEST:
Secret rye Planning Commission
Page 3 /
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
as regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1961 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Tolstoy, King, Sceranka, Dahl
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS! None
0
S
,� V
lI 1
u
64
protect :lo. a .fit
la. All trash pick up shall Le for IndlvlJual units stn all rew_ptsle, slim l
from public view. If no Centrali Xed trash ....pilot,, all provided. oco
IS. Standafd patio [over plans shall be subnq (¢d (o aria J.prortJ br the City
Planner and Building official prior to eitupar1, of ", mist on
I6. All building's nr,nrbers and rndrvrdwl ,r IS Sell EP identified In a clNr
and concise manner. Inciuding proper rllpnin a halo.
sue/ 11. Solid core exterior Joors, security dead hot-s and lobs, ibill be Installed
or. each Unit in this project.
_ Security devices such as winch. lacks shall be Installed on e.Ch unit,
19, All Oniti within this development shall be preplembed to be aA,,teJ for a
Splar water lied tang Yo l t.
20. Energy conlerv,ng b.Ilding ma taria,n and appliances a r,,o,red to br
vorated into to r5 pro. Y,t to Clude such things are b[ t 10 he ,f to
redu(ed consomptlon chewer heed[, better grade aI insole [ion, daub le paned
windows, ea tended overwngs, pilotless appliances. etc.
21. This deve]olmle.t shall provide an option to home buyers to port na se a sin a:
water heating unlL
22. tact Tan o /stbe Foothill eGi re hProtection vo s[rlctthis tnc[ [o one ,ti,.
29. Local and master Planned ENUeitrlan Trolls shall be provided throughout [lie
hr'Ict m accordance with he Eade,tri an Ton p ,
r+ I plan Indicating ald[n3, m armua slop ^.s, I n. A leir it era e,l ,rt tr Tern
and raced Control, accordance with City eguettnao Ira it aS Doha rEt Pn5M I1
e tuSml,ed to and approved by the Ci[y Planner prior tY IDprovl and
recordation of the final map.
21. To is [raft Shall form or innea to A malntr Mn(e
[r l an L ra5 1 s . 013 [r l(! for malntpnan [e or
enues
25. Street names Shall be 'Ali I'd and approved by the City pldnnxr, In accord fn(e
with the adopted Street Nami.g policy, prior to approval and retardation of
the flea] map.
26. If this developed., Intends to restrict enuestrian o animal related 'uses
to speclfie lot$ or prohibit them entirely, We^ a copy or Ih¢ C.C. 6 rte's
ust be submitted to and reviewed by the City planner error to ..prowl of
final map.
21. This prej eat shall provide percent Or affordable housing an,llor
t.. O conformance nformance with �Inera1 plan housing Follow And for eoutrng
he ld¢lecderided
lied rhy Gremlin rates' rents Ordinance
III b'didnfin[nabll rS Vi sl All
LhP time of C.Is t ICC[ion of the prolecL An agrb nrnnt [n su<n sea 11 be
approved Ly me [i ty planner prior to IsSYJnCe or Lu rid log Fermi LS.
0. pa rkino 6 Veni col err Acters
1. All parting lot landscaped islands still nave a eCtside alscnsion
oI 5' Ina Shall contain an 18' walk ad)atent to pa ,k ng stall.
2. Parking lot tree, Slrall be a minumw 15 gallon sin.
8
CEPANTITIT OF CGWUOIT' CEVELOPMENT
StA43ARO COAD TIONS
Suborn: _
--
Auol ¢ant __
location:
Those
Items C...ked a [ LUndll rpe5 of d ?prOVal. "
Aivtl
V'.a Ahsll CJ'. [ACr a:E r -'" 01VISIn:I FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE EOLLOIING
A. Site 0ra_o
y, 3-
See t ill t.• "'el"` ri i cordo! with the eppraved Site plans on {Ile
i^ very b r'90vr3 ends nnix
n, inn mndrt'Al conpinad Here m.
2.
pev35e1 :,I.. Hl a I and bulldfng elevations Ines rep rd ling +11 Conditions
of
a.Ji va.r❑ to Su Gnr ttN to tn! Planning H,,isloh prior to ]SSUanfe
bmldlnr
z l�
Fero[,. of
A >a
rrl or o,rz r ^q�r•ze shall not waive cdm,llaoce won all sections
o
[re or
, na rn, rr ice diet all other applicable C"e rlmin
,.,_ cl r r m elren
htl rlamlaI'd"'t ,s aa:. ace
_ a.
TL: �vebp..r tr,ol provrea an aaedr,a [e s[aerard area I,
tats with
Rec"Ytu•r
6'
eehrc" stma
g punuan[ m up stanaa.ds.
irate
-1G
roc rp pole areas shall by enclosed by A 6 foot nigh masonry wall with
+ r. CS :J
tU.[rng gall, [,rre,,ar, to City Standards. totdtton Shall LC
11111CC t
t fie
ysraval br [he Planning Givtsian.
A
.review
,rlr of [lie roof n. a iJl Snatl be au 'Brad [o the rtanm ny Oir
l.r Ision
C
cord apvmuAl prior to 13suanceyoI bulldm9 permits.
Z
All rwr a; :fur [e•ancez, including air coMiti d,,,, shall be architecturally
Trite;.';o f,
SmeldrJ I—, vre'w Ind the sound burlered from adjacent proper[les
ant streets as
req.1red by toe Planning and 0 Thing Divisions.
II 1— 1. all iof to. Project Slte or business activity being commenced
O... in nenL be Completed tI
nix sit ... aa ma of bbd 0rrec[orvof Como
unity
9.
This approval smell Leco.P null Intl void if building
Ball, are not issued
for this A'- "ct vr[hm one year from the do,. of project IF pia vnl.
lo.
ns i Cnndr[ional "in re•a,t, "is Frolic, shall become null and vo In i
Pr �r.Ir¢n IiI
q ^Ins find date pf approvel, 'ell SS permits are ISSUI•d o
uve aL:rroved is Completed. r
IL
A E. "'1" Irnnung plan 'all be suhni[ted to +ad approved by the Plnnn inn
011. t; rm
Friar [o '1 � 11 of building pxrsits. Such plan shell indicate
:ale. ILrn rev "'it"'- height
and method of Shielding. III lighting
aff,
snail edmr3d ly argct Idlacent propxrt ids.
- 12.
nil s +inn rng
Poeli-ln,talled It the time of initial development shall be
in lvr Mated.
13.
Je,tufiaed pedestrian p+Inrays ICro3S CIrCUlatfon Allies ibill be provided
[Ira• derelo P^en[ to Connect dwellings with open ...... and
recr¢J[ibnal uses.
lI 1
u
64
protect :lo. a .fit
la. All trash pick up shall Le for IndlvlJual units stn all rew_ptsle, slim l
from public view. If no Centrali Xed trash ....pilot,, all provided. oco
IS. Standafd patio [over plans shall be subnq (¢d (o aria J.prortJ br the City
Planner and Building official prior to eitupar1, of ", mist on
I6. All building's nr,nrbers and rndrvrdwl ,r IS Sell EP identified In a clNr
and concise manner. Inciuding proper rllpnin a halo.
sue/ 11. Solid core exterior Joors, security dead hot-s and lobs, ibill be Installed
or. each Unit in this project.
_ Security devices such as winch. lacks shall be Installed on e.Ch unit,
19, All Oniti within this development shall be preplembed to be aA,,teJ for a
Splar water lied tang Yo l t.
20. Energy conlerv,ng b.Ilding ma taria,n and appliances a r,,o,red to br
vorated into to r5 pro. Y,t to Clude such things are b[ t 10 he ,f to
redu(ed consomptlon chewer heed[, better grade aI insole [ion, daub le paned
windows, ea tended overwngs, pilotless appliances. etc.
21. This deve]olmle.t shall provide an option to home buyers to port na se a sin a:
water heating unlL
22. tact Tan o /stbe Foothill eGi re hProtection vo s[rlctthis tnc[ [o one ,ti,.
29. Local and master Planned ENUeitrlan Trolls shall be provided throughout [lie
hr'Ict m accordance with he Eade,tri an Ton p ,
r+ I plan Indicating ald[n3, m armua slop ^.s, I n. A leir it era e,l ,rt tr Tern
and raced Control, accordance with City eguettnao Ira it aS Doha rEt Pn5M I1
e tuSml,ed to and approved by the Ci[y Planner prior tY IDprovl and
recordation of the final map.
21. To is [raft Shall form or innea to A malntr Mn(e
[r l an L ra5 1 s . 013 [r l(! for malntpnan [e or
enues
25. Street names Shall be 'Ali I'd and approved by the City pldnnxr, In accord fn(e
with the adopted Street Nami.g policy, prior to approval and retardation of
the flea] map.
26. If this developed., Intends to restrict enuestrian o animal related 'uses
to speclfie lot$ or prohibit them entirely, We^ a copy or Ih¢ C.C. 6 rte's
ust be submitted to and reviewed by the City planner error to ..prowl of
final map.
21. This prej eat shall provide percent Or affordable housing an,llor
t.. O conformance nformance with �Inera1 plan housing Follow And for eoutrng
he ld¢lecderided
lied rhy Gremlin rates' rents Ordinance
III b'didnfin[nabll rS Vi sl All
LhP time of C.Is t ICC[ion of the prolecL An agrb nrnnt [n su<n sea 11 be
approved Ly me [i ty planner prior to IsSYJnCe or Lu rid log Fermi LS.
0. pa rkino 6 Veni col err Acters
1. All parting lot landscaped islands still nave a eCtside alscnsion
oI 5' Ina Shall contain an 18' walk ad)atent to pa ,k ng stall.
2. Parking lot tree, Slrall be a minumw 15 gallon sin.
8
3,01 tw w m
line-way aisle widths shall be a mini: of 26 feet wide. %
_V11. tme ncy a— shall be pfovi. led, m intewnce free and clear, a m nmrna
nr 2ir feet v ill time, Jun rig t nStructlpn In t oru,inCe vrth'inothill
fire o,1111C [y r, gavunm L'.
-/S. -At per ksg 'Pao" shall to double 'Wiled-
6. Ail carts S.11 be pp, W,J with aate,itic garage door openers.
%1 )b. —
✓9. me final design of the perieeter park..ays, walls, landscap lug and slde-
want'hall be included in the rerlurred landxapr plans and shall be
Sublec[ to aPVroval by the Planning 0inz:nn.
_ lo. A rr or s of the trees planted within the project. spill be
/ suet inn ,. ito trees.
1. Pevgna 6 v... ,, Pa Kin, a pas shall be turf blocked.
0. Sign
,�. ➢.e Cuwnellt t. k I'l a J unless ions the rearle Nt a ofd 9e of ortati L,owl
.r':c 45 on tnu cite unlev trey are lbe prinu rile source of transyo rcpt inn ,
;or in, panne,.
9. r., a, I mg seal) to p,,v it:eJ -Itc. the interior ti culal,o', aisle other than
trd I'll "I PI, k; rig on pas. Covenants. Codes. and Rest... tli ns
NII 1,. : r
ve l,.. l Ir Ne alp K n: l ant and sutra: tied W the City Pl a Ing
It o— poor to ,staansic of buldled Venal".
C. tan mq
$ n as tn, L.l Lv.e an.. ........ on plan than be er.tm ntr.e en and app ro loud
±r vac ;'i v,,. u,g f��, t, :n p or 1, the Issuance of budding permits.
rib,) V. ry sn,ll be rr to swell .a trever pe"ible. A mister plan of
c
vig t he, r 'a or a toed t,en+ Ii 22 and t,to Zt. t be
cn > nier ['e d-, i;. Sald p[an shall take into account the proryis ed
'la
ol I, L,. e. a c le r red. [ inq m+tlrn JS..ln m ,l ahe n
:1--al r tar ,.n1aVnant of r loud trees. Tip plan Is rcqu,r,d
t and a; 1. acrd Or the Planning U,vi,lon prior to upvrovul
n/ O,cZ1 ,nO 9 a.hng pl r
Slim[ tries, i ,w n.,.v of 15 gallon size or larger. Shall be InntulluJ us
crJ !tart e;v Plon of itrn4 trees for lbw City or IhnUm
Cm a.';: q> mat s: %I be pl..r eJ at i rags of t ery ]U' he inttrr
t \ ) b,-1,, end V' pn floc ncr itrret5^ ar lo
1 P n, n 57 t. ees per ..... a[ ..prised of the follovihq Sites.
e., tl be 1.3 .,inn In, deaelessenq 20:44- boa or larger. ID: -t5
mien, nndnl0:- yllon.
_
S. All lan.ltca;ea , Hall be maintained is a healthy and Nrivin9 Con -
damo, tree fro. r.5e15, Slash, and debris.
6. All stele banks in e e of live (5) feet in vertical beight and of 5:1 or
q... L+ .late Wall be landsoiced and irrigated in accordance with slope
r of ill City ul Pa-lo, Cucisonga. Such slope planting
'all —clone but nit to 1.111'1 to rooted ground Cover and appropriate
r,.tt and tree'. all '.0. of...... and t Shall be m-t n...nlI
n, l.I ned i a ..:IN.. urn vt.g CanmuOR by the developer until each
"",waist unit is salt and occ up l[J by the buyer. Prior to releasing
[.,voo, To, LI. :, units, an ntpv[[SOn of be slopes sbill be coinyleald
ty the placomg Staff N determine that It IS In Sa tl sla Clary Condition.
Ali P.."I", o;'n are U
a s. and IavJep ing Shall be fully m,ali Waned by a
I. -'x wr4 a'. t4C to Sienor ole,,v moans atteptab)e to the City. Such proof
Of n I, 1, Lenin cc Sha II be subs: t ted to the Cl ly or to Issuance of building
11 front yard lamiscaping. and an appropriate irrigation System. SNIT be
instilled by tilt developer In accordance with Submittal plans.
Special lanas[spe features such as mounding. alluvial lock• sppcieen slap
trees, meanWnng side.al5s Ibmth verVCnl and hpn ¢onlel [ ')el and
Intensified landecapm9, Is reculred along
Any signs Prbpnsed for NIS development shall be Jesignod I, conformance
wish Ue Cunprebensbe Stgo Ordinance and shall require nd approval
by the planning Division prior to installation of ....b signs ew
2. A uniform sign program for this devtlafmont shall be i,Lnttrd to the
Planning
Dv ion for th re
us, v ",e and aPyrowl prior to Issuance
o1
Building Permits.
_ J. The :igrp ind, ca led on the InWit led plans are r.,t approve) with thi s
approval and ,.nl rums tic Separate ttgn e..c. and awl. —I.
E. Abibinal_ Jprova)s RegnlrP_d
_ 1. eevelolnrnt Review shall be accomplished prior to the nmante or a Buildta,
Vernl t.
2. Oevelo;n -ens Pevie.a shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdlv,aicn map.
approval 01 Tentative swap[ char• IS granted subject to it,, approval
Of
A. This Conditional Use Permit Is granted for a ph, ed of rvm Nls) It
,rich time the Planning Commission may add or delete condi Clons or revoke
the Conditional Use Permit.
5, The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by
purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or
adjacent to their property.
in purchasing the Some located QA Lot , Tract
on _ i he ae read cue C.C. A .i: s aria
enders and iy Said 1pl is snbIL,1 to a ..!.It rrciproeal
vent Imr the purpose of , YOwsng equestrian traffic Lo
,a in a¢es I.
Signed
vwtn..er
Said statement is to be flied by the developer with the City set., to
occupancy,
Pn or [a spprpval and recordation of the final made, or Vrlor to nuance of
build inn Omuntf, when nu igidiv is ion map is Mrnl loud, written vrt,T ¢a<wn
frum all affected School Districts, mull he zsmitt,d to the f1h ,daunt of
Connelly oevel."ll viiet, states chit a,le.l'.ate ': I,unl Iacil,t Lei n I.
111 be capable or attMnsal,10 , students generated ny inn prnl•'<I. aSuth
letter or eertiflcatlon must Dave been issued be ti, School llntnct .wtlmn
sixty 00) nays prior to the final loop approval in the Lase of the sub-
division map or Issuance of perai in the case of all other residential
Projects.
Pri r m d:prn,el aea re nnlauo
alr :,ur l.lov, r. :fits rl...11`rr0 m:0 ^z inr hir final :van, or pear he In:: Inuance
.r II`trJ. Or, t`i's ei rr tr1 r ere
r •:r[ ur rL : x. .r Ire Pra exeSvC rD1 CCt. xR.11
[Ifni •• :,L -.d O:.r. yrL SuCn (¢[term be xvPm tt nisi to fir.
(r.. .[[riot tvl .l ry +rtbr( nY 1`01 JIYS pr l.v to fil al ear L..r .v.l Cy
.r re= i onto e+i.e . : [ne It ra
[r str• 1 I :�.l rr ul Thar( ^,1 ^f [z tnprrsfPllc tln4 fat �l �tltll r M1er
p r.l Jn,l ntf^ VII allu.:lr if
'1•t e.:: b. [r. urBna i. IIo
b. p.`ICI City, tr. an ::, 1 tI t err,: �. earl. znan
-_e. rn el rn fir,
1 ' :[I :4N rr ln. •:` 111 and vo1J if_,i tint
, :l. •:..y �i ( :� 1 r^ur¢1 Im n,n fie sure w. is 11-1111 z n vlp
vn lr s en ert�.rt l:+ des t.u...: x ire the alromval of lhrxne: of
. gra IN by tea Plane irq x
. 9. ir: + Id ear bzra n tai ut nrt[(J as a Io [al 2melopmonr Foloa r
' d I
I. `,n .,:1 .z rUl vr• ,n[ aarn9 o'atly to the J sign sn4 1 s
Ue nap Ir [)e•rs.>d ace pr r m dell P"d dal aae ,rc tat lonfor
,a v.9Jro he d¢velop d s via na.ev.
VPLInI'N[, II1. $M]Lt CO'.iGCT i11E tlu -TIN S Divl S!ON MR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLL04111G
LL \i
F, Stte L._,_C_I� -e_nt
'�" -Jth the late[[ a:InP :n Builein9 C+Je,
Coigne Clvnblrp Code, tiJ Vnifonn
n [lows Elec[nc fuUe, mid
dll ctr.. 'n dr'f Ci In er /p[[ e[ Inn [line n( ISSUdnCe
OI g9at'. ¢t'� ° -a Jed urw
—ice 2. p'SL^ is ttt :. s: trail:ley PPrl.:les for [UmbustIbiG Mai tfot ti Pn, evleen[!
: rdll LC st- 1tL : :> t . .... to :n
O:t tr i C[ Gire sir"I that If dater
[Air I „r fl.e t � � Idble, pent ln9 cumplet: an O( rr9uir¢J
die Wdtec b„rr xYi4 nt'Or rs r
t ('� __V' ^. qs7 oo a; ure n�u fade randeRgs dare It for new res lain Thai dell tog
e :[Tl zA, at I ... ..... ;ee 9 n t(s ), the applicant Shalt pay
it. Cl- d rate. 5uth fees mar ind ode. ant nn[
C..e bsren; pee, ,ire:[ and'Ic'. Cnefe fig Palo Fee 8,allileFFee, Systems
a. prior it 11.¢ 1$ ee:.
u[ eadm :Ian rIn an �eltg pe—'t for anew Comnl,cial o InJUS trial
.1-l—, fC at [rc' e: [J!: M1tl of long Qeve lwx :en( [1:e apPlicaut rll:all Fly
CL,c fees' sS /[lain. GevelOpeen[ Fee• Oraiv 9 Includ, b., so
5. Strad aJJn „es Snail be Provided by the building official. an
a Ce e1u3t N1n”, temp pet n:er:.aed with fire retardant material aea no
e of ldrial� n
•.q lw'g; IIIII nave the building
L• J-1•J'v:en nLllwnal .wd lam around wmm..a lion being the street
s a a_ and woad Sid leg Or Vlant-
.. C¢µ Ln1_[.eC
__ 1. Pruvrh• « g ian<f ,.Ito [LC Lbrfurm evil ding Code IOr Property line Clearances
onSld =rin] ..... aea and fir. -res isli rend IS of existing bm ldrngs.
�. 1. F+rt;svr nuilJ iaq(tl slid ll pe fie Je tO coarplI wl[h Curren` O,ri lJ irrq and
lumn9 egu4[Innt
for pre - nlbrJeJ use a [ire bJ 11JIny dal I
11.111 dLpatal fa:T;ty C' shall bI redo. Id, f111e' aIW]nrreM1shed.
•ply vita IL¢
Units, plsabin9 Coale, and Onl Corm Boildinq hill/hr barred
Allies, no.
H. Grad Inn
1. crag in •I of tb
Pu iaJinr f sObief[ P111-1, s1m 11 fie
ran I yra Cnrler CI^Y 6r+Ji a SI n:: cnrJanfe wi tl::M1f Onlfon
fnnte [Thal n9 Ole sIeh. 6 S,bS(antlalacon lO nodes dJ rj9 Pn t cC ' vine
✓ Yr.JJ leg Ala • [n [he eYVroveJ
1 2. A zoil DS rep Prt Ina 11 be Arena red by a yual ifieJ mgln der license., by Ibe
5t ate r LI loflria to Perfofm
zou:.:ork.
] a 9n'lO9 real rfpor[ a aprcl'a rfJ
ntl 1."Itt'd aI tl :e s[ ine of LY a quallfled
pplical ion (or grading p]an nchrtsf 9eolu9JSt
<. fh, noel ynd leg plan seen by IDbJeR IP r +M aonrovel OF no.
.rr Ulny eanmit;ee and snap Lc CM:GIeteJ p''i or [o r urea true If bn final
suLJ lvi v on man or Issuanfe of om leiny perms( chic Lever [. t•s fl rst.
e.
As cus [on -ID[ whdivisian, the following r,PI -ren[t shall [e re t:
I. Surety zlru ll be poste) and an agrMnenl eacu t<e, gr,e ran [rn ie9 coops Of dll on -Site Jraiwge f +c iii Lies n Cz sary (or deuslering all pare
AP,rO t0 [be Sa tlslaction Or the BuiI'd'
Jing and Safety Oi vi4 on.
n' cIl,d.Ar late ea Sen:en[s, (or 'are dttpptal Of drainage wJtrr felt are
r,c;v tee unto or over adjacent parcels, are to be de llneltti and
ec Wed to the satisfaction or the eoildin9 and Safely b'r nlOn.
c. the si to dr+Ina9�rOMro le, dare tocba
Np a[
ary for Jewerie, Or protecting
Subdly idM
b"ld{ng pnmit' for co uc[ion n W ;Ad prlpr to 1 of
[u, or ont,ib,,,, [o, Ern lnlel open any pacel That mey ben'in...t
parcel relative to who ch a buildin9 .a_ii Isq leasing or wlthln +
d. Final reined tad.
q fad leg plans for each parcel are Co be su bin tteJ to the Oulld ulg
nd za fety pivision for apVroval Prior [n is tua ncp of bu llL ine permits.
(leis may be on an incremental or mnpe'i to bans.)
I. All slope banks in [Ices. Or five 5 f
51 Or gfpdter 'l)pe Shall be Seel(5)w rtnt In Yertlfal nei•Int and oI
Cp 9r."no or So *.e Other Ii ternative -In el Ire n'J:,s ulen Cr.npOris on
o.nbeC t'J [o Lye s” Ir"a or the sled Jr r sloe con Vb, sells
51:'11 he If.. sled to germ ina [e the seed aria maintainOfficial . Irr iy ll mn
6 d ;TACs f[er gee'nina t ion. 9r On [h td A Goinl
MIDITIOU 5)IALL CONiACi illE EfIGIrtEFRING
APftICAdH` LOYPIIIU115: 06_ISIOa
FOR Cb1pL IdI:CE HIT" HIE ills LP.:ING
O—edi /-caattlons and_Yehicular Acce_
t Ofdbations slwll he III by final
Of—, end all Ill ... ary ea,b, . alp,.., I on [herten lochs[ rrghp-
_)_� hdr¢a [Ian Shan The made or is es ,I✓
streets: the following rr ghts -or -way an ure r011pw ing
rr additional fee[ On
adalt Irvin feet o n
–,_ — =–
�' , Corner property line red Sus Hill be —_ - - -- — -- - --
re9u(a'ed per 'Al "anderds,
_.1. Ail n9hts of v,, It'll,
as rol laws: 1'19 res. to and egress from snap be Jed meted
5. xerinroc+l ealerr.en [s shell b -
over Private Dads, en ^ e provleeJ ensuring access W all pa rc an
the nap or snail be re<OrJed concur, ntwlcn the mSo be noticed
6
SGEEt•. -
1 t
4!�I IFi pJ'I �A.
5111:- -fall vE
:, LCP4L
_
Of __1 to
p1%is inns be made for the to...... eg.... and Internal
•
1
m L[m,r
, cI1
of arrr truUS .h ¢ls ,. itl be coed rnr del,mry of goods to
be C. a Ja'r!Y
ar la the nl•era [i on .f the DraAJS PO OVSInP33.
p.
Pri al,
I_ 3
r c u s -lot drainage Shall be required
an,l Sl all
Ali t,n brad
henarl ra.`a•Cd a :at"edon Lt., final n.ip.
[v Iving
q,.rtedf -ee
cu en within lutu.e eight -o f.." ale b be
or a be Ja M1leat,j an the w0 Der Clty E:Iglneer's requirements.
9.
I'll—et,
for I+J,...alt for p61" nits mall he A.J¢at" to [Im tit,
sere s :n'.al +t "'ed" Wall" Drip :. proper".
J. Street
[en3t:,rt
'nil sIr `Ct it veo4n [S including, but not ,bolted I..
ure a g
-v- n e limn "It. Sid,v.,lx. nrrve apprmchm,. wiled,
E'111 dIIJ
tt.e:t Irgias on all lnterior streets.
Z.
A mmm ,+
r.waY
.1 : r wrJC C,I Vemen[ within A ....... wide Jed rtaLed
rmg1,,,
I,I11 ta•.5- f•rtea Or an na!r- Sic tign uret[t.
1.
C•, I I n
Ih - f. r lo. -1 In I S I ing imDrde,.. ti including, tol nY[
I hi, e.1 t0'
SGEEt•. -
1 t
4!�I IFi pJ'I �A.
5111:- -fall vE
:, LCP4L
11f
LIr.1115
(
OS ffILAY
Sp7iITa
.ISVBp nM(R'
1
r
' Icel.j!S Ian /.SUpinj and 1 ngation an muter. -
O friar to a +y .tick Ming Fe,f..S,d In the Wbllc right -af -ea Y. fees
'all t^ Gama one a - oily ^nl pelmet 101 he ontainee I'— the
E =g'I" S Ot It or, m a•JI b on to any AAer permits required.
). St reef 0 ru+.r •tit It ar r'a'•prd, to by the CEry Engi nee and prepared
t•1 Aelrvtere-1 C11 11 Engi ,er shall be requ -red, for all Street
cl,a5, pr:w 10 1 u[r of an encroacbuln[ permit. Final
plan
`4'
aed pia M1lez coolies now the location of all edl Sti n9 u[01 IIY
elm l l Ues within the ngnt -Yf -w Y.
�L 6. S..etY SnJlt be posted Ind a n agreement eatcuted to the satisfaction
.e um Cv4 Erg, e: er and theOtY Attorney, guaranteeing Cmrpletion
L[nr r• -111 I e.1. +..•. b, prior t0 re oreing of the map or the
I of Ca 11 J mg per mts, whichever comes first.
All Street Inpro,eeents shall be Installed to Line sat....... an of the
City Engineer, prior to OC[upanCY.
t B. Pa •o• ^n[ striping, mining, traffic and street rune Signing shall be
ins to l lea per the regm ramentS of the Cs ty Engineer.
g. Er IStIng CITY road rp,nirinj reconstruction Shall remain open for
tufflc at all times 11th amequa[e detours during construction. A
cJ SO C.'1SIt shall be m ;ulred to cover the cost of '-ding and
p-1.'. .bill. 51.111 be ref-ItIJ an camplebon or the construction to
Line i urlae b In .r [he Cey Fng met r.
WE :r[
_ 10. Yali-111 Shall be provided between PVblte side.111k5 0 on -Slit
� pla,, law areal.
11. Concenera trd Jra lodge flows Shall not trot. zide.alt5. Undar SWe.ale
Jralni Shall be Installed to city "3ndardt.
Ig. An energy diss,oator one /or o i n antral i fes Shall be ulalleJ
to the Sati Sfacban of the Cl tyt[rrig iota• at Lne end of Silt, Slrerlt.
A le tier or abeare,,ir o. dra0 wage runoff from the downstream property
...nett roan be rbaniebo.
K. Vrarnige a
� nJ n_nod Control
I- The ap,llo,lt .111 be respon3l ble far coineruct, on of all an -site
drainage facilities reg0 red by the City Engineer.
1. Intersection drains .111 be required at the follo.rog locations:
The nroDOSCd pro. ect lolls ultnrn al ens tndicam,l a b
na,Jat to �\
flooding under the hotional flood Irrturance I'Ingl Pn and IS subject l0
the provisions of that pregfam and C1,y Ordinance '11. Zg.
,. A drainage channel and /or flood Drotrctiun wall hill be rrlulred to
Protect the structures by Jtvertang sweet runoff to Sir..... or to A
s wlm drain.
Ade.giat, provisions shall be made for acceDGore and dtSpnsal of
Sorface drainage entering the property from adlacrnt areas.
6. there .1 so from the Gan doh. Strwrm property .110.11 shall be required
.// tract fl.-1 onto private prWltles.
Y ' m u_ shall he des.
Stree L3 ieaulnng a canbinat(aO of s gated as raJOr va lcr WrrYmg
.Ype drive approaches, rolled It"Itpcolal zien ..lints, [c - +r rc sal
•all'. and /1r IaMSCaped earth berms and rolled SJri veaa'sat ct Vn
line. / property
_ 0, the follohlng 'tomm dralm 'hall be installed to the s,t,,fe[tAh of
the City Engineer:
_ 9. Prior to recordation of the map, A band -scale hy.lrnl.v is and Jra rata ge
Study !or time prof et[ Slull be sufmr(Led to Sit City Engineer for
Study+.
E. Utilities
1. Provide all utility services to bath lot including sa n.t.,, s cis
.a ter, electric Do,.er, gas, teleplmne and Coble eel this inn on Sit, .
All u[lldties wilhln the prole[[ shall be G grvunJ
ll¢d unuel
Including utilities along major ar[erlalI lesz than un e,
Utility eaia :entx that) be provided to flee spe<if�c�� fin Jr the
Ut
rving utility tmpanles and [,, City Engineer.
�! a. Developer shall be re3pan1110e for the VC10cition of a .rang pub11,
u[ni beU, 5. a3 rt auire d.
14eeluper shall be responsible for the ins Lallatioh of street li9hll rig
In accordance with Southern California Edison Cam Pony and City Medards.
1
r, oaea red.
_ °' stile, and ti r plans roan be desiffnrd and ConSLmCt,d to sm,,t
— :t, pl : 2 Lnc.: rnnga Cmw,ty Mater District (CCDD), fa+Lh111
(u a,. +•Ue O,. al Health Cw]rtmvm or II., Cen.lr
of fi]J I T le 11, or a'a."nese f:'cx C11.0 rill L2 e•lu. -eo
�'. :: I•. n.,.lt 1. not no,n vsu,ad (ran all ut00.ks and other inte,rttrd
a 3. �a l,..1 fn i• a,al o' the final etas, will be s,Ll „cL to any
ry aa� t tents 11.x1 a:ay t•e rt:•.Ir2J fit, tnen.
F. r..•: ,I C:_ _ _nt, xvil A_I IIL
_ 1. parents
f.. a, I; :vs will be renutred as follows:
rill. ,..: I •r.
— 0. l..nt, Itr.t :'a tnno :L [ PVU ri eJ jir w� Ai {stiance of a --
_. ,l. ..l....l p.. n. LY
C. Saw w.dru fvun[y ill old Co. lrol District
A v.py of lri . narl,. Cund,tians and Pest"In ns (C.C. L R.”)
a,,: A,,, c la, o(]I+ a,.nn I :!an of the dom,oi -ml I A... Oati.r. sntIll
to tv^ a .]1 of to Lily Attorney. shall be recorded with this nap
ew , topy p a,,..Pd m tna Cl".
f,r`1 sr . ?I a t tract maps shall conform to City standards and
1. vrl r „11 to 11 urded prior to first phase mEelvlslon to
01 u':12a0 y', I: id ill
P15.
'/ 5, frill, Ln ,:,I Liana ] hIlloe of lntentlon to form andlor join
1 .. d i IV.Inn' list, ICts shall be (Ilea with um City Council.
Ire u.a c1111 in.alved in District foriaatint iW1 oe casino
E/ pe�J Pe el;Le�
la, pod D,rkraya Pre repvlred to be annexed into the
lance ca:e amain ten]nce district.
_ ). La.. l: Lapin, a r.r a .ptlon systems required to be installed on public
n yes 'eter of this trait a o slain be conit-elisly
n 1•, n.] se We L—I.prr until aCCelaed by the City and anno.rd
baa tr. L.A; -1p, n],ate.0 nve dist, lit.
0 i
r,
. • ORDINANCE N0. 1660
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSO S PARCEL NUMBER
208 - 061 -03 FROM A -1 (LIMITED AGRICULTURE) TO R- 2 -P.D.
(MULTI - FAMILY- PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) AND GENERALLY LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET QNb
BASE LINE. 'Ropy.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
• C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's parcel number 208 - 061 -03, generally located
on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street
and Base Line, is hereby changed from A -1 to R- 2 -P.D.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS _DAY OF JULY
0
il
STAFF REPORT v
DATE: July 1, 1981
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
NO. 80 -13 - DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT - A change of
zone from R -3 Multiple Family Residential) to
P,- 3 -P.D. (Multiple Family - Planned Development)
for 11.5 acres of land located on the east side
of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Road for
the development of 240 condominiums - APN 202 - 181 -12,
and 21 (portion)
ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 27, 1981,
held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above zone
change request. The Planning Commission, after reviewing Staff's
recommendation and conducting a public hearing, has adopted Reso-
lution No. 81 -61 which recommends adoption by the City Council of
the Planned Development designation. The chanoe of zone is intended
to allow the development of a 240 condominium unit project. In
related action to this project, the Planning Commission also adopted
Resolution No. 81 -62 approving Tentative Tract Map No. 11797 and all
conditions of approval related to that development. The approval of
the Tentative Tract Map is contingent upon the approval of the Planned
Development designation by the City Council. Attached is a copy of
the May 27, 1981 Planning Commission Staff Report, which fully describes
the project.
The Planned Development designation is consistent with the General
Plan. The development of this site, as a result of the chanoe of
zone, is consistent with Ordinances and Development Standards estab-
lished by the City. During the course of the public hearing before
the Planning Commission, no one spoke in opposition to the project.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice has been placed in the Daily Report newspaper
advertising this item as a public hearing and notices were sent to
property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries. To date,
no correspondence has been received either for or against this project.
l�
Environmental Assessment /Planned Development 80 -13 .
City Council
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the
attached Ordinance approving Planned Development No. 80 -13.
ly.submitted,
BARRY/ K.
City Plan
Bk. *MV:jr
Attachments: Proposed Ordinance
Planning Commission Resolution No. 81 -61
Planning Commission Staff Report of May 27, 1981
•
L J
i
c
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -61
. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -13 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN
THE ZONING FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR 11.5 ACRES
LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
ARCHIBALD & BASE LINE.
WHEREAS, on the 30th day of December, 1980, an application was
filed and accepted on the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1981, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following findings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted
in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding area;
2. The proposed zone change would not have significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties;
and
• 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the
existing and proposed General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the
environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on
May 27, 1981.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California
Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
27th day of May, 1981, Planned Development No. 80 -13.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -13.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall
be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOAOA
0
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 27, 1981 EI
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 8D -13
TENTATIVE TRACT No. 11197 - DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT - A
total residential development comprised of 240 condominium
units on 11.5 acres of land wihtin the R -3 zone located on
the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Road
APN 202 - 181 -12, 21(portion)
ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted a total residential project
for the development of a planned development consisting of 240 dwelling
units designed around a continuous water element on 11.5 acres of land
within the R -3 zone. The project is submitted as a planned development
and would be so designated on the Zoning flap upon approval by the City
Council. The project has received favorable point ratings to allow
consideration of the project by the Planning Commission. The project
is now being brought before the Planning Commission for its recommen-
dation of approval an the Planned Development designation and approval
of the Tentative Tract Map. Resolutions and conditions of Approval are
attached for your review and consideration.
BACKGROUND: The project site is generally located on the northeast
corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Street (Exhibit "A "). As the
Commission may recall, a recently approved Parcel Map split the property
located on the corner, for purposes of developing a professional office
complex and to allow the rear portion to be developed as a residential
project. The project consists of 240 dwelling units designed as condo-
miniums and placed around a continuous water element. The intent of
the development is to provide views and frontage to the water element
for each dwelling unit. The site is presently zoned R -3 and is General
Planned for residential densities at 14 -24 dwelling units per acre. The
project is designed at approximately 20 units per acre. The application
will require two actions by the Planning Commission; one would be adoption
of the attached Resolution which recommends changing the zoning to a Plan-
ned Development designation, and secondly, approval of the Tentative
Tract Nap with the recommended conditions of approval. The site is pre-
sently undeveloped and contains a chicken ranch which shall be removed
with the development of this project. To the east of the project is an
existing mobilehonie park and areas to the north and south are presently
vacant. The railroad boarders the north boundary of the project.
G
' Staff Report
PD 80 -13 (TT 11797) (2) May 27, 1981
The project has been reviewed under the Growth Management Review process
and has received the minimum amount of points necessary to allow consi-
deration of the project by the Planning Commission.
ANALYSIS: The project, as proposed and with the recommended conditions
of approval, will meet the provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act,
the City Subdivision Ordinance, and the Zoning Ordinance. As was pre-
viously mentioned, the concept of development utilizes a continuous
water element flowing through the entire project and providing frontage
to each dwelling unit. All dwelling units are provided with private
patio areas as well as having the ability to utilize the common open
space and recreation areas provided throughout the development. Parking
is designed as detached carports and open spaces around the perimeter
of the project. The dwelling units are 1 and 2 bedroom.
Primary access to the project will be provided by one main entry from
Archibald Avenue which aligns with a proposed street on the west side of
Archibald. The internal circulation system is basically a loop system
• which does not interupt or separate dwelling units. Since some of the
carports and parking spaces are on the opposite side of the driveway
frori the dwelling units, it is recommended that texturized Pathways be
provided at appropriate locations throughout the development to desig-
nate pedestrian crossings. In addition, it is recommended that the
entry way be treated with a texturized pavement to enhance the entry
and improve the Special Boulevard treatment. Secondary emergency access
will be provided at the southeast corner of the project which will be
ultimately tied into the proposed professional center on the south end
of the project.
Under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance a multiple family develop-
ment is required to provide 2.2 parking spaces per unit, one in a carport
or garage and the remaining may be in open spaces. A project of this
size would require a minimum of 528 parking spaces to meet the require-
ments of the Zoning Ordinance. The project applicant is proposing to
provide 1 space in a carport for each dwelling unit, and a balance of
260 open spaces which would provide a total of 500 parking spaces: 28
parking spaces short of the Ordinance requirements. The City planner
has reviewed the relationship of the unit sizes to the parking require-
ments and feels that with 96 of the units being less then 700 sq. ft. in
size that a minor deviation of 5;; would be appropriate in this case. If
the Commission concurs with this finding, then a Minor Deviation would,
hereby, be granted with the approval of this project.
Staff Report .
P.D. 80 -13 (TT 11797) (3) tiay 27, 1981
The present grading of the site falls in a southeasterly direction.
The conceptual grading plan has been approved which indicates an
insignificant change in the present grade of the land. Drainage of
the site will be taken across the southerly parcel to Base Line Avenue
to existing drainage improvements.
The project will be required to meet the minimum tree requirement for
multiple family projects as established by the Planning Commission, In
addition to the landscaping, the project is providing an extensive
water element throughout the project area. Attached in the exhibits
are some sections indicating the landscape treatment proposal along
Archibald Avenue which meets the requirements for a Special Boulevard.
The applicant has designed the frontage of Archibald to create a diver-
sity in the parking arrangement and pockets of landscaping. It is
recommended that dense landscaping be provided around the perimeter of
the site for appropriate buffering. There are some existing trees on
the site which staff recommends saving.
The Design Review Committee has reviewed the architectural design of •
the structures and the design elements of the project. The Design
Review Committee gave a favorable rating of the project contingent
upon final approval of the composition shingle roof by the City Planner.
The theme of the project is to provide a woodsy appearance with simulated
masonite shingle siding and composition shingle roofing. Colored exhibits
and displays will be available for the Planning Commissions review and
consideration during the meeting. The number of trash enclosures
provided throughout the development will not meet the needs of the total
project and additional enclosures will be required. As these enclosures
are being proposed adjacent to the carports, it is recommended that these
enclosures be designed with an overhead shade shelter for heat reduction.
Details of the trash enclosures and the overhead structure shall be
included in the final building plans for review and approval by the City
Planner,
Part I of the Initial Study as provided by the applicant is attached
for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and
a field investigation to determine significant adverse impacts that nay
result from this project. Upon completion of this study, no significant
adverse impacts were found as a result of this project based upon the
conditions of approval recommended. Therefore, Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration for this project.
Staff Report
PD 80 -13 (7T 11797) (4) May 27, 1981
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the
Daily Report Newspaper and property owners within 300 feet of the project
boundaries were notified by mail of this hearing. To date, no corres-
pondence has been received for this project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
a public hearing to consider public input on the project. If, after such
consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of
approval recommended, then the adoption of the attached Resoluiton and
Conditions of Approval would be appropriate.
fully submitted,
. �BKH MV:cd
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Sections
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" - Tract Map
Exhibit "G " - "M" - Elevations
Part I - Initial Study
Resolution for P.D. designation
Resolution for Tentative Tract
r
_ r
i t
- I
r
r I
} 1
___ ___ ____ ________ i
I
1
1
I�TJ \: ;,; `:�c" S� (jam /�[)' ••.:` S
Ff-
�x1116(T r'�I,
,
':x
.SITE SUMMARY
i
I
�S
R.
it
1'
49 uR
SITE PLAN
•
�r
':x
.SITE SUMMARY
i
I
�S
R.
it
1'
49 uR
SITE PLAN
•
ON
S
L- :4
d r CQ�S'i
8 =
01-
i�iYll eii.��L7
L
R
--- -� i � OlvotlrNC Inv�AlmAnb Co.
240 Unit. Condominium Community
ArAChtCAl0d Av*n0
V C a o4
nuv110
I
in J..,' , i •
f ��,
1
� I
�:�'� • it , r .-.C.y i .a �.,...... I :....� � I
'
Mkwi u
A BGG ON
Jc.
Y d T. due.
�wc
ilk
}qqn, !ddf
�'!II
i
v'
l.i
I�.
Rl
'I
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
-TENTATIVE-TRACT No 11797
snn
NJ
I�
I '
it T- - - -'�- �/ 1EN11AiIVE MAp ...— ;_
II;� -71'77 �Y .� __ -�` — ..�3_ °"- _' l_. �'
i, suaL
; I~1itAL1 +y.N° ii`i797��x�
_ ill '.I
MIT
,ri II I
I Li
\ -. �—
.. I I l _ Iii
♦
;;
µs \; \l 4 ��S �
_ 1
�``\ �; .j.� 1�- `,•` �1 / `
\1 ,1 'I � � L..,`,� q I.�y �i
.
LL 1 Ij7 �- •- I
�n
f
:.r:. � , i,. ,; tit l I � ! � I I •t !
r
`Oi.l li
NJ
I
PRONT A NEAR ILIVATION UNIT TYPE
AT.-
II
NJ
I
PRONT A NEAR ILIVATION UNIT TYPE
AT.-
V '
v
y
a
y
I
ENO ELEVATION UNIT TYPE C ENO ELEVATION UNIT TYPE l�E L
EEONT ELEVATION UNI} TYPE D
r V. X.
LMEI
IN
T1
L
'MONT ELEVATION UNIT TYPE C
DEAN ELEVATION 111T TYPE C
�MN �,
v 1%
MINAl
L Mw
4,!4
.41 A
J11
—'AIR PM
ACAA ELEVATION UNIT Type
a
• -'pl"
col
i�
I _
I
f
-NND ELEVATION UNIT TYPED
r_
�Nu
INTERIOR CARPORT$
x
I�
FRONT RILVATIOR
RRONT ttt VAT1ON
RIMtATIOM IUIIDUIO
CITY OF RANCHO CDCA.NONGA •
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects reu_uiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt o- this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Stu'd'y. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no iater than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Retort will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project. 0
PROJECT TITLE: Unnamed
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Diversif ied Investment
Company, 270 So. Bristol Street, Suite 201, Costa Mesa,
California 92626
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE Of PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Jack Tarr, 270 S. Bristol
Street Suite 201 Costa Mesa California 9262E
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
9738 Baseline Road, Northeast Corne of Arch bald and Raco -_.
line, APN #202- 181 -12, 21, 22 _
LIST OTHER PER ?TITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCILS AND THE: AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
N/A
• PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Sixteen acre planned commercial
development including office, tinancial, restaurant
and multi - famioy residential
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Sixteen acres
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONME *TEAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEPTIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Site is relatively flat with abandoned fruit trees and
and scrubgrass growing on site. There is an existing
chicken ranch on site with ancilliary storage and one
• single family dwelling unti, There are no cultural,
historical or scenic aspects which will be significantly
I
Existing animals include mice, pocket gophers and ground
squirrels.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
No
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO •
_ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration!
g_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)'.
_ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
_oneral nla- ePr .- nati ^ns?
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 30
_ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
5. Existing abandoned fruit and misa laneour„
Count is approximation.
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evallation can be made by the Development
Review committee.
Date _��'ll_Zr% Signature
Title
T--'3
l
r =S?DE-117IAL CONST.PUCT_ToN
Cie following info.- .ation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cuc::oonea
Planninc Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to acco:l^.odate the proposed residential development.
1!ame of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Diversified Srvestc nt Gro�any
Specific Location Of Project: N6'C Archibald and raseline
PHASE I
P! -'-'.SE 2
PHASr 3
PI1A.Sr 4 TC';;,L
1.
'N z:nber o` single
family units:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
2.
Nl=ber of multiple
family units:
60
60
60
60 240
3.
Date proposed to
becin construction:
6/1/81
5/1/82
1/1/83
8/1/63
4.•Carliest
dzte o_`
4/1/82
3/1/83
10/1/83
3/1/84
oc
Mod. ^
and of Tcatative
5.
Bed-cn -.s price Rance
A 1 Far. 88
$48,000
• B 1 Ear. 32
53,000
C 2 Edr. 72
66,000
D 2 :dr. 48
80,000
RESOLUTION N0, 81 -62
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE •
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 11797
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11797, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Diversified Investments, applicant, for the purpose of
subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 11.5 acres
of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald & Base Line into 5
lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing
and action on May 27, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11797 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable S
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement aco.uired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
C,
J
c^
c c
(9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
. environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11797, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Dense landscaping shall be provided along the north,
south and east property lines.
2. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building
permits.
3. Additional trash enclosures shall be provided throughout
the development and shall be provided with shady shelters.
4. A minor deviation of 28 parking stalls is approved.
5. Texturized or enriched paving shall be provided at the
main entry to the development.
6. The recreation area shall include a safe and secured
childrens play area. Details of such area shall be
submitted to and approved by the Design Review Committee
• prior to issuance of building permits.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
7. Widening of east side of Archibald Avenue with A.C.
pavement to provide for two through lanes and half width
median from south project voundary to Base Line Avenue
shall be required.
8. Tentative Parcel Map No. 6651 shall be recorded prior to
issuance of any building permit.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
7 _
/.
Richard Danl. Chairman
of the planning Commission
y �•
A.
�l
0EPAAf1Yd1 or Cya,011ty DEVELOPMENT
STAlDARD CDSDITIOIS
5uej ec r. — 1_I___�l_l /1 l —(_1_L -�—
Ap,llcant:
lac,t,an -. _wZW1 -
i niliP stair) Ct cc ta'd Jre -id, [rc n) p( er Jraval.
AT. IlU T 9M1lCi CfY :ACf ;uE PL_gl n_, 0;7 IS 104 FOR COMPLIANCE WIT11 RE FOLLOA::IG
CC-:Dl ik"I
Site Ct rinp.rnc
V 1. sue shall be a..,rlopea Sn ordance with the approved site plans an file
in V,, plaunnq Division and she ciadlcions contained herein.
_ 2. R-isrd site PWnz aid durlding elevations incurpPrating all conditions of
a4>rorel stall L: su:mtted eo the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building C "r rnr a.
_y a. - eprosl of lass . g-,, ins it not ua i ve comp l lance .1 th all let t ians of
[fir Z.hi in l. —.11 and all other ApPI ic161a City Ordinances in effacI at
[rise al pal rla nrr3 a'—ul rSSW_r42.
a. TEC d. a nail 4+o'nJC all lots .nth adequate Sldeyerd area for
Neereat,sn Vehicle s[ ,e pursuant to City Standards.
_�/ 5. T..rsh n cep Gacle a Sr Shall be enclosed by a 6 riot high masonry wall with
u,jeis lru: v rig gars Cm'want to City Standards. Location shall he
[ to a,v Dui by the Planning Gl Vision.
�. A z o of a n :a [e dal shall be Submitted to the Planning Division
tar r. +man aria approval Prior [o Issuance e( building permits.
�J. A11 hair ar necances, including air conditioners, shall he architecturally
m tegn t. d,r thrld :J fen v 11. and the stood buffered from adjacent Properties
and stn its at renu,rM oy be Planning and Duna.., D —dons.
in i.,r a io. of [be project site or nuslness ac ,il, being cmnrnced
11 111P.. all lnu.lrtrva of ..Uined herein shall be cernpleted to
t1e zatl1ra :"ch of Ile Dlr11Wr Of (Omrwnsty Develepolot.
_ 9. This approval LNI ecore null and vaid If building permits are out issued
war this pr.le:t el"- One year from the date or project approval.
IC. Asa Conditional Ilse prrnr[. this Project Shall becore null and Iola In
,,outrun Ilel n. „n ms frc, date of approval, unless permits are Issued Or
laze approved Ss completed.
�11. A ar[I ilea Irgnt rn9 plan Shall Oe samr +aid ro and ape rmea by the Pleeninq
Ci vl si n onch to once of buslmn, permits. Such Etch stall indicate
style, Illhmonnthon,SUOC rtian, height and method of shielding. 11t lighting
shill IJ... bely affect adjacent Properties.
B.
�2.
All s. hes Ing Pools-installed at the time of initial development small be
so”, (Mated.
_1Zp. T,,turlred pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided
[boon lot the deities", to connect d.ellmgs vimh open spaces and
reureabanal uses.
•
i
Project Ito.
_ZI0. All train pies up shall be far Individual units with all 1ec1Pycle1 shielded
from public vies, if no ewtraliled trash rtcerucles a e prnv aco.
_Z19. Standard patio [over plans shall be sobmluo to and appeared ty tM CI[y
Planner and Duil JIng Official prior [a occupancy of [1. (vst chit.
�6. All building's numbers and individual units [hell be identified In a clear
/ and concise uiume , including prover illumination.
— `}, Solid tort exterior door,, security dead Will and lofts shall be Installed
on each unit In this project.
i9. Secarity devices such as window Tacks shall be installed on lain unit.
19. All units within this develo Plant shall be Preple.bed to be adaplud for +
soli water heating una.
_ 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances a red to be
incorporated into WS project to Include such things .s butt not Irmitrd to
reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double purred
wlnJewS. extended overhangs. pilotless appliances, etc.
21. This development shall provide an option to beer buyers to purclase a Solar
water beating unit.
22. Emergency secondary access Shall be provided to this tract to the sells-
faction of the foothill fire Protection District.
23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian }rails Shall be provided th,000imut the
tract in accordance with the Equestrian trail Plan. A a,: ri ten ... C, ran
trail plan indicating wiJtes a , m nu n slope S. phycScaI tandtt,nnt.r' lrncinq
end creed control, in accordance wl thCr ty eauestrian trail Sri,, fires. shall
be subnittm to and approved by the City Planner prior to approvsl and
recordation of the final map.
2e. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district far maintenance of
equestrfan trails.
25. Street names shall be reete.ed and approved by the city Planner, m attordente
with the adopted Street Gaming Palicy, Prior to approval and retardation of
the final map.
36. tr this aeve let, .1 Intends to em list[ equestrian o dal related u
to spec stir tots or praht her leued by the City a bay V.o C.C. 6 Arof
1ngx be subni [led to and revlewetl by the Cr [y Planner pr,or [o yproval of
nna P.
_ 27. This project shall provide percent of affaidable housing and /or
en ts. in canfornhe rice with General Plan baud., policies and tLr hnat+ng
rr lterte defined in the Ore.lh Managembot Ordihmnce. Afford.lb+l sly shill
be determined by current market rates, rents and median Incore levels at
the tie.- of construction of the project. M adreenr.•ht to such Wall he
E",04ed by the City Planner prior to issuance of building pomgs.
Park[., 6 Vehicubr Access
1. All Parking lot landscaped islands shall pave A min lhnum Outside dimension
/ of 5' end lo shall contain an IB" walk adjacent to yorking stall.
1/3. Perking t trial shall be A elf. rem 15 9113On six.
�I
j. *,..-.a, u11e wid"S Shalt be a minimum of 26 feet wide. •
\. i —,,m.y a troll be fw —Jed. maintenance free and clrar. A m rm
nin
at 'aa ell 1.." 11 all ti -S d.nng construction in accordance with r foothill
ore may
All par;Ing swceS shall be double striped.
6. All cants finals be "'IlCJ with automatic garage door opener S.
1. Dc",.a,.'J v)srte, psrsing a eas shall be turf blocked.
lb, [oven....., In.!" anJ R"t",tim)s Shall r,ftri,t the Stnfalfe of rell,stlonal
r=Iv`a an this site ..), r IneY are the pfr n=iple .... c, of tramp..... [ran
� lot InP .,.Tar.
1 ( 9. o fir lrr l ".III to prrnrrttad within the intCrior circulation aisle other than
n J•'.r,..'[.l vrtrtrr 1'a'trnn) ar'e.ta COVen.ln ts, Cadf s, cost flci [fi=t runs
,hill tx Je. ni ;:el :y N: aipircant and Sutmrtted to the CIS, plamdng
O run inn poor to nrwnca of CJrloing pf snits.
C` ar_s•ai r:rq
_ ✓. A 1f1r0.1 l.r. a ;re :v A I rfr :g.tran plan snarl he submitted to and approved
by It. Ill rig bl.lv.n prur to the Issuance of Wildine permits.
y 2. J—tun hrct shill a.• r r.rJ u r Possible. A matter plan of
trs t . I'll, i' - er lncalron, z Jm type SRJI br
Lr t .CIa:•ar Si .l r plan Shall taker into A, [nt Lne prup.,ed
rr aJ n.l, - ; 11 ui ... to bP relied. !.bull", nelhnJS.A All vr,", new
1,— i t- ,r 111;11 tar rarlgoaent of ie,ivad tff•y. ihC p4n is aryired
Z, 1e s t .el oy in, Planning Division prlur to .pprov.)
or Ire tan Iq.Ali', p!I'-
t /y. rut t:, —. a in vom of IS gallon size or larger. $tall he installed in
,etn t rt [e. 1111, of Str.,t I.... For It,, City of Band.
f� !u a'.r . s ;I: a 11 :C pio t�•d II an a r , ,e of eery J0' on in is. Tor
\ Slrerts J.na 2d' on .rte r ,trials.
_�. 4 mrnrrurr nl 511 1.e "S pr. gross acre. coigrited of the following sizes,
shill cf fi- l,J wl tern the C relnpment; 20144' Wm pr larger, 101 -IS
� nrllcn, ar,t I0: -i ..Ilan.
All I1 nL; -coil arras shall be maintained In A healthy and thriving con -
drbcn, fee, Iron waeds. Slosh. and deb,".
6. alt sim y lams 1, e .nest of live (5) feet in vertical Wight and of 5:1 or
I'm% grUCUr tl o1, tlulllan IaraAcaped and irrigated in acc,oldalce with slope
plan a :.g r nto
if tI, Ci" of Bancno Cunnonga. su=n Slope planting
,an rn -li a s,it n t ee Norte, 1 red g w:m c an,, appropriate
vJ ti's. All 1.0. Ill :rd ingrAnd ire ge [loo thall be cos,- ,I,
r.a
In early and [noon, cpndl[rnn by the level ... r until each
IIO-1J.al .-1 11 1n16 and o cupmd 1, the buyer. Prior tJ rbleallb,
occ,lanci for tl se units, a Inlpf Ction of the slopes Shall be ca Nleted
by 11e Plan-n, Staff m det,rrelne that it is In tau zfac dory nonesuch.
Vol" . .alt pI...uyl, a.'^n Mil. aw bnmcaping 111.11 be luny m.rnuinee by a
b,.....joss 'la[icn or other I t.r
m f an l acceptable to the City. Such proof
ante Shall oe IwbIIllrJ to the city prior to issuance of Willing
a- lam 1—t y.N IanJV =aping. and am appropriate Irrigation system. shall be
lnruli.J by in, developer 1. accordance with submitted pines.
10,101
—4, " Th. final design of one parse.... care...., walls, landscaping and vlJe-
va111 shall no included in live ri,n.,.J lanrlscnl¢ plans and shot] be
subject to approval by the Planning Linsloa.
ID. A sin roux, of _i of the trees planted within the project, shall be
Ip,11froi site trees.
-- 11. Special landscape features Such as zmd Ing, allurlal rote. speciF[n size
Sloes. meandering Id,.Ilkl (1,11V,,,Ics, d nnria to 1, s go) and
Inlensifsld landscaping. IS .,,Aired slang!L- (ll���y -- -
D. 51gns
--t,ov'' /
Any signs proposed for this Jevalopnent mall he it',,, rd Lv [nn Idla.n<e
v l to the C,01,1 1blive Sign Ordinance o1111 ,.All rMwre rr and approval
by the Planning Division prior to Installation of Such signs..
2. A uniform sign program for this develocmrnt shall to solo +l ltrJ so Ire
Play :nmg Division for their review and approval In ioe to Issuance of _
Building permits.
]. The signs Inrllrated an the Submitted Bans are at +p,r..m with his
Approval and will require separate sign revi ev, and approval.
E. Additional Aryl _lz 0.espvl[ea
1. Devesupmmnt Review shall be ectorplithed prior to the Issuance of A Building
permit.
_ 2. oeveloprent Revlev shall be ICCsmp lisped prior to recordation of the final
Subdivision map.
g. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted sableI, to the approval
of
e. This Conditional Ose Permit Is ..anted fur a period Of ..'his) 4
which tirrre the Planning Commission may All or delete cprier[rnt or ..vote
the Conditional Use permit.
5. The developer le required to obtain the following si,ndl statement by
purchased of none, vhlch have a private or public equCitr tSn trata en me
adzacent to their properly.
In purchasing the home located on lot Tract
1 have rein the C.C. A A%.ire
Wderdtand- inaTsala Loi— _ n 'ablest to a mu :nli reciprocal
Bailment for the purpose Wallowing equestrian tray fic to
gain access.
Signed
Pu .chaser
Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
".'panty.
Prior to approval and ree.1datlen of the final ma P, or prior to snaure of
Wilding pfrmns, when no subdivision nap is involved, w.i ucrl «.n nu bun
Ira all illeelre School Distrito. 'ball be IlmmUed to in, IHy ,lacnt of
CIA nitY tl ev rluPwn[ which states tb.l admluate s ml 4enrtlrl S nr
.ill uEe capable of accamnJating sludrnll germs..tint ley cant pr na rnL ra inch
letter of certification must nave been I red by the 8hno1 Dlu rs,l within
sixty (60) days orlon to the anal nap approval In the ca of if, sub-
division nap or issuance of permits in the ..fie of an other residential
P1.1scls.
'. rr for W I: ..... w I and recordation of the final mop, or prior to the iss arc
vl .q -•,, t ImolvrJ, ills. 1 -1`8,111 III , the
_ rl r J: n Ln, all'•,ate r.l ""I fa Ilrtl..
will i :lu mIS t'+ v,qm zed SprCj,ct. z,..all be Sd rnl4d cod the
I. as r I .rv,
Q. •,.h nt x .Ill f".0 -, nt Ge,. 1,1 1" .m6t Ir,vr Lap, n.. n r.l 4Y
-loon �1 In III JJ 11 in o I.n.11 r wind in
aril of pa' r.Ltrin ok C of all lvtlrr.rb
ill ,., n.,,1 r C•a)eC,, .. 1 P tept:C tint I....l..... dun Mlle
n `nr.• . v.Lr h.I 6.•lio •:I r C,,11.1 poall ant rrt ce in Ittic
'. LII :C aL ..ln pl ,,. 11t1d iln[ta IList.11n9 all SuV. Jrt lve In lur inn [.p.l. Shall
1„ Jata In rJ 1.1 t..l.nl t:l'd in tl:n List.
.a %b 111 I. '.e .null d,J vJ id if the tan in Iive to ho i v r, Inn reap
I
I r I'a II .I, J q De ni tt I .Id "n . n I, III .s
. Il ve'1. r l t,,,l,. l`2) S fran in, ...I of this pr ",,
.I"" an ea,..amn sit ,r.l 9r.rd IJ q the Flamun9 Commission.
_ g. TIIII Ina,;1t111 .11 w i •,pled a a total deaelopment 'a Cka4e and 11
:lyl -.nt ""I, relative [o the v' sign ^C 4,U.. of
, pr far to filial approval and r JaUvn or
tae rep If Ina fib hi. n..n I, feud, to he ae.e loggia as tract Yo.".
CI ICcor Sw4L CG:. ST tvE :'14,111 II:V;S :C4 FOR CWIPLIA9CE WITH THE (OUNIlaG
`(114,:11 ^'6:
F. Ste r. .11.-o .oc
Jy�'1. Ii.e N - -.I :c_ilt ;':I1 rond, Li t1:e Uniform latest aCa,,,d Building Code,
]
L. if Cr on vn Jim Plu.mmag CaCef effect anal Electric o Code, and
oil _tor t ,:.le (dine and o.d.ndntel in effect at the trim of isalance
_�. Pr or Lo I of A,Ilding permit, for can.4us6ble construes-, ee,de,ae
.JI - a[hlll ^.ntr it' I.,, Chief toot ta,prrmy renter
♦:ly h.r rl , rr C :[�. [.on Iz ..w lla pie, panda., cmryleted of regal red
I- oc,sbm.
(� _3. It or to toe 1 rte of a Ecilmo, permit for a rev residential duelling
i R(,1 a at!,, nn to an ¢alt[m9 unit(,) toe applicant SC.J) pay
,t...t t'nt 1.'nt at e Iacl -1 'Its. Sur, feet may include. hot not
In 1. -rte, to: City Grau;lfiot vin Fee. Park Fee, Drainage Fee, SYStays
IL'.ela :'wnt Fee, For, ., aeJ Plan Checking Fee,, and Scholl Fee,.
4. crab, la ttw i ." of a building CUmit for a new CmmerCial or industrial
-- it .. a13,1r.n [o a rag develop*ent. the applicant shall Pay
[ fact a[ "o, et U hl unrl fete. Saco fee, may rncl u.,¢, one not
I. r, i1,1 b: System, OPveloVUen, Fee, Oramaga Fee, Penn,[ and Plan
Co, Ii feet.
` S[reat aJJn:zes snail be provided by the Wilding official.
_Z a. C,e:l.ni ona,, bull he mnstmctee with fire retardant ma tonal and non -
ca.I;uble root vin ten al.
I. All [ - ollings ,fall have the Wilom; elevation facing the street
.r., wrtn al"llonal wond teen around wsodows and fwd siding or Dlant-
o,t ... a.. ie.,'Inc .
.. (d wnq_te�l r Pt
_ 1. P,n.l,e Cu•vpl.a^ce with t e Uniform Building code for property fine clearance,
C_nlrJenn9 tine, area and fire- r¢,iltiveneII of enduing buildings.
2. 1. Uhf I.., le,.l.lal 11,11 be mule to rdily wish Corrrnt Duildin,a and
ton,., ricialatians for [be mteuded use of the building Mall be Mrelished.
9. 1.1¢mq : age d]spotal facilities shall be removed. filled and/or upped
tI Iomoly ..In one Umfom Pl, :bin, Code, and Uniform Building fade.
•
Project lid.
x. cr'ae /lnc
y 1. Grading of the subject property 11.111 be in Ic,r I.,o wish lb.. uniform
BolWind Code. (lay !.14(11 Standards Ind a CrPt.nt finding ,.acts,,. The
rural grad 1.9 plan 11,11 be I. suvseant la: mnrom.mv nl [n the al v. vied
conceptual gradlof D)an.
__z2. A Soils rvlrort shall be prepared by a quell(ied englnI,, licensed by the
Stare of Cal 1.4.111 to p,rfI,m such fork..
y. A goolo'Pcal report stall be prul'ared ry a ,-,at pled Or geuloglst
and sutnitted at ale tine of application for 9raJing plan cLee4.
lh¢ final 9fa.Yrng D)an stall be wbl.¢t to re and a,do -al by the
Grading Corrine¢ and sl.all be ccePleted prior to reco,datoon of tic final
subdiYl,loa map or issuance of Euilmng pectic whichever cones first.
5. As a custom -lot subdivision. the following requirements shall be met:
A. Surety 11.111 be posted and an aiie¢n.ent c.b,,tcd, 9varantrdin9 cropl,h``"
IS all o site drainage factlitiet necessary For dmatering all part( 1
to the satisfaction of the Dull ding and Safety Division.
to Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drains,, wucr that are
conducted unto Id,atent parcel,, are to be d,li a tel and
recorded to the sallsf.Ct.on of the Building and Safety Division.
C. on -site drainage improvement, necessary fo. dewater Ing or Pictecling
the svadlvided 11c,aItles, are to be in tolled prior to i va of
bi,ldin9 penaltl for eonztruetic. upon auy parcel [hit m , to sunJeel
to, or contributes to, dnu.age flocs entering, leaving or within a
parcel relative m which A building Permit IS r,,a,,Led.
d. Final grading Plans for each parcel are to be sulmitted to the Cuile mg
ua Safety Division for approval prior to Issua,C- of building pemelts.
(This may be on an Incremental or corpo Site W111.1
e. All slope boob in ¢aces, IF five (5) feet fn rent uei height and of
5:1 or greater slope shall be Seeded with native gr1,Sa.S upon CrmylPtaon
If grading o Sure otter aliorp,, re netlue of c ... ot do ... rul 4111
he thalOrted to the sa[95WCtmc of the Co.IJln,plflval, .1910 -
Shall be provided to germinate the seed and maintain gro.tn to a point
6 man chi after germination.
APPLIMIT SHALL COIITACT THE Et_LIIIEENIMG DIVI510'1 FOR C0.YPLIANCE WITH LIE FOLLOSIM; -.
CONDITIONS:
1. Dedications and vehicular Ac_;
1. Dedications shill be made by final map of all interior streut nfhts-
of-Imy add all necossary eusemen [z as sfiese on the trmtntise map.
2. MJicatmn shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following
itroets:
add monad feet on
add l [howl fee[
_ addltibnal retie a,
__ ). Corner property line radius will be required per City suhdardi
1. All rights or vehicular Ingress to and egress from shall be dedicatee
as follows:
t 5. geCiPrpCal easements %ball be provided ensuring a,c ens to all part ell
over Private cocoa, drives, or parking areas. and slue be noticed on
the map or shall be recorded concurrent with the map. •
J.
6. a pan vcn s'all Uc ^ ^tie for toe Ingress, egress and Internal •
1., +In Ireckt which will be used for Wi ]very of 9acUS to
urn- w:J. nr 0r w ire n. await e> of me pNC01M Wsines 3.
1. ,r— , d-o o s .l. row t s s -)Jt u' mgt Shat) be requited
and still he dr n g
liuted ur noticed 11 L`m final nap.
✓ B. All eosu.y easr,pts lying within future nght -of -way are to be
gwtclo,ei or to he Jel +r m te_ on the map per City fngrnrer'a requircrecents.
J. E,,cots ta: in '..alx fir pool 3c uses that] be dedicated to the Oty
.L..e srde.al is a.. -ter teraugh private property.
4 hire M1.p•n__ _
1. Lan. t poll -.twee r eats inaudmg. bat not limited to.
urn a 9a'-, 1. % C. pan neat. 111 -a1L, drive aPProalhe3, par}ney
Z,,e% and S;r:'et ligr, Jr all interior Streets.
_ 2. A ern r. •.•m Of ) hint . .e U.r. anent within a 40 -foot vide dedicated
f -.ay ,hill r, c.r.:tructM run all half-Sect'..' 3[Y Ceti.
_11-_ 3. Crnr ct fm toucher, m earn, smprover.ents including, but net
I mnrJ la
T C li iPlre - C. —•ttt hill -
L-7" rLl4ils o6EDLA, �.i sin 0 Ol11Eg
// I I ✓ �' T-aCn
melude3 lan3vcaprnl amt r rryatron no meter.
w"'A. Pr ter w any ware tern, p`rfp—cd Sn the public r[ghbof -way, fee,
rgll :e tail e:'1 an enCraaCL+ent permit SN11 be obtained from the
Crsa En",ye"s 0ntsce. m addition to any other permit, requii-ad.
_Y_e_ 5. S:rrrt m ant plans a;pmred by the City Enq lacer and prepared
a Pr'tnmrr.t C .il En,ie,cr doll be icon irM, for al) Street
n• Uner to r e of an anew acMent permit. final
p1.3x argn[rJa lea s +aN .... fee locaboo of all existing utility
S.1Cnitttei within the light- of-.ay.
_wv�, s.n t. troll be posted and an agreement eseciated to the sati SfdCtlon
0t [re , t; (nlrn.rr and the City Attorney. 9 +lion tees ng corrplet3un
.f tie 'aOf nc n. .cn t,, pars to re crow ng of ale mop or the
rlSmnce of Leildrnge peralls, ah¢he,,, Co-aes first.
-/1. All street maid. ihat3 Shall be rnStallad [D the Si ti,faCti On of the
/ City Erva"r. peter t0 OCCVpaney.
✓ g, Pa.nern; ,Lr apuq, mm'r rag, traffic and ,treat wine signing shall be
— 'estsllc: Per f.0 req.n runancs of the City Engineer.
city . ......... in, rJ ap,l,,c, ich shall remalo open for
trdire at all limes swill "',die deL ... s during baltmat,icri. A
1,11 to r:)mr a to r the coal of g,rning and
p, n r.g.. s,t.all Le refunded toCtomDlel3on of the construction to
Van salt sfaclmn of Lire City Engineer.
4
✓10. 4alkways shall be provided be Mean public sidewalks ant on -slte
pedestrian are a3.
✓11. Conten(rrttd drainage flows shat) net op31 sidewalk S. Under lida.alk
drains sl.all be m:talLad to 01, v1aod,d,-
12. M energy dlssipator and /or erosion control reasrrr'et shall he installed
to the satisfaCUnn of the City Lepneel. It the end of Stub Street,.
A talker JI acceptance of drainage runorr (ran Che do.as(rean property
one vertu be required.
K. Uraluage amt Flood Cnntrnl
✓1. The applicant will be responsible for w notch of all nn -site
drainage facilities required by the City Engineer.
i. Intersection drains .111 it required at the following lccalibn5:
✓3. are proposed PYOjcct falls within treat lidicated as lobjeet to
fioadhrq under the Ilatiowl Flood In3uYdece Program and as sbb,,,t to
the provnlons or that program and City Ordinance rij. N.
."d. A drainage channel and/or flood protection all will by required to
Protect the structi es by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a
ftma dram
_✓ 5. Alegua[e provisions shall be made for accrptanro I dlspo5al or
/ surface drainage entering the property tram adsacent mess.
s! 6. Letter of acceptance erg, dm,nitrea'n property nears x1,31 be required
.here runoff fran the tract .laws onto private properties.
3. stall he designed as slur wit acing
strw -ts re,u nag a xin".,tlnn of spec al curb hatches, l rat
type drive approaches. rolled Scree( coat,c(lons. flood prn(eclinn
alts. and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled drisie ays at property
line.
're"O. gone fo))cwinp storm drawn shall be Installed to the satisfaction of
One City Engineer:
Canap�gynif< �!1R2?FLWi(Y ode p[4 ff.f1E+��f.£lrnc/v✓r'
azadisr_lsiyhAblu2e,3od rf�fs
AYE' `s'!�Y�S1peYgtalatq..taK:aY.laMp, %ban fp/ &A ape, NtGaa^,'I:y»t r.J a
_9. p•ior [o /d "I&Ir ef/}a.gi y' a LrcaYUale hydmlou¢ an.l Jrenwge
study for the pr lent still be suonitted to the City Collector for
relic .1mieoge our /ifs.
L. Utilities
_ ✓1. PYOVSde all utility Services t0 each 10t In ClYding Sanitdry Store,,
water, eleC(rlC boar , gas. telephone and Cable tellstalon cundull.
✓2. A)) utl ties .;thin the project 10111 be installed underground
melba triHg utilities along maior arlenals In,, fran 11 Kv.
3. Utility eesPNnts shoal be D,.,ided In Ille Specification of the
ur ing utility companies and the City Engineer.
✓ a. Developer shall be responsible for the relocatlOa Of existing public
00,111s, as repaired.
S. Ueeeloper shall be responsible for the Installation of street lighting
in ac ... do.. with Southern California Calico Company and City fmndeNf.
{. water and se..r plans shall be designed and constructed to met
renui mnents of the Cucmonj, County water District (LEND), fonthlll
fire District and the rnviramental health p•partnent of the County
of San Perna Nino. A letter of co.u,lunce from CCND will be rnryi,,d
Tripe to recordation.
Approvals Asvr not teen seemed frm all utilities and olhcr interested
agennes involveJ. Approval of tl¢ final map will be Robjecl to any
re9uirments that may To recobed from them.
M. Lnmeal Yegnlrnceg[q =nn ny.Provals
_ 1. Pere.ts f, , oInc, aIbncfes will be rmn.trld as follows:
A. Caltrans for
n
—a. To.¢r nnu A.iu. —coot reW gyred ,,.r td i,,LUn of a
sa. 511 ald'. t1
_ C. San 6c•na rd ono County - Flood Control District ; )
D. Diner:. - � �• .
_ 2. A copy of the Covenants. Eondi I Til and Res Tel et l ons (D.C. 6 A.'s)
and Article: of Incorporation of Lhc Nonenvners Association, subject
to [bu al --1 or [Le c.ty AROrney. Shall be 'u'arded with to" a.D
s� and a copy r.o0ded 1. wo City.
_ Y Final Da•ccl and tract maps shall confom to City standards and
prpcNUres.
e. A pe •eel map Shall be rec.,dcd Prior to first Phase a.bd1y M.h to
Prevent Creagan of unrecmlmted parcels.
5. Prior
to recprdau an, A twtice of Intention to form and /or Join
tarol,ape one Llght -nD Districts shall be filed with the City Council.
The engine -ug costs involved in District Formation SWII be tome
by the developer.
6. All perimeter landscaped parkways are regobed to be ennead into the
lands,,,. ....tuna... district.
). tandscapEn9 and treigation sYSfenS eMi,.d 1. be in[ tailed on publlc
W coign[ -cf -nay on The p.mm�dMl of this [net a a iMll be cangnuously
,nia,ned Ly Lto develc,.r ungl accepted by r the City and h.bed
lot. the Iandsape Pa- lduanle district.
1—/
•
Protect no.�^
i •
I
ORDINANCE NO. ISI
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
.� CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
202 - 181 -12, 21 (PORTION) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF ARCHIBALD & BASE LINE, FROM R -3 (MULTI- FAMILY)
TO R- 3 —P.D. (MULTI - FAMILY /KANNED DEVELOPMENT).
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
• SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's parcel number 202 - 181 -12, 21 (portion)
is hereby changed from R -3 to R- 3 -P.D.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
auren !4. IJasserran, ,ty er I I
• M _ Ov
COVINGTON 6 CROWE
1 TORNEY5 AT LAW
WEST 5 N STPECT
IPO ST OFfICf BOM 1515
ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91162
June 15, 1981
Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Office of the City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 -C Baseline Road
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Control of Blowing Sand and Soil Erosion
Dear Lauren:
Enclosed please find a proposed Ordinance which adopts
by reference those portions of the San Bernardino County Code
• which provide for the control of blowing sand and prevention
of soil erosion by wind.
The adoption of this Ordinance is made necessary because
the County Code sections which will be adopted by reference
were amended since the last time the City adopted similar por-
tions of the County Code by reference.
Enclosed you will find three (3) copies of the subject
County Code sections, together with three (3) copies of County
Ordinance No. 2517 which adds sub - section (d) to Section 65.015
of the San Bernardino County Code. These copies must be kept
in the Office of the City Clerk and be open for public inspec-
tion.
The procedure for adopting the enclosed Ordinance is set
out in Government Code Sections 50022.3 through 50022.9, cop-
ies of which are enclosed.
In brief, these sections require that after first reading,
a public hearing be set (for the second reading) and that not-
ice of the hearing be published pursuant to Government Code
Section 6066 in a newspaper of general circulation in or near-
est to the City. The notice must state the time and place of
the hearing and must also state that copies of the primary code
and also copies of the secondary codes, if any, being considered
for adoption, are on file with the City Clerk and are open to
i
Page Two •
June 15, 1981
Lauren M. Wasserman
Re: Control of Blowing Sand and
Soil Erosion
public inspection. The notice must also contain a description
which the City Council deems sufficient to give notice to in-
terested persons of the purpose of the Ordinance and the sub-
ject matter thereof.
After the public hearing is held, the procedures for
adoption and for publication of the Ordinance are the same as
in the case of other ordinances.
If you have any questions concerning the proposed Ordi-
nance or the procedure for its adoption, please call.
Very truly yours,
COVINGTON S CROWE
BY: �- •
ROBERT DOU ,R TY
Assistant City Attorney
for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga
RED:sgg
Enclosures
cc: Thomas Baird, Deputy Agricultural Commissioner
Department of Agriculture
County of San Bernardino
•
SAND A \'D SOIL EROSION 62,011 -
-J
DIVISION 2, SPECIAL ZONING
Chapters
1. Control of Blowing Sand and Soil Erosion
2. Structural Height Limitations in Vicinity of Air Depot
3. Airport Operating Areas and
Height Standards and Limits Tlierein
Chapter I
CONTROL OF BLOWING SAND AND SOIL EROSION
. Sections:
6:.013
6.013
6'.01 5
6'_.016
62.017
6-2.0i 3
62.019
6'_.01 10
Statement of Hazardous Condition.
Permit Requirement.
Prevention of Dust Storms.
Territory Boundaries.
Permit,
Fees.
Exemptions.
Establishment of the Soil Erosion and
Dust Prevention Commission.
Annexation of Additional Territory.
Notice.
6 1.011 Statement of Hazardous Condition.
The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino does hereby
f,nd and determine that there exists within the 11'esl End Resource
Consenation District. serious and hazardous wind erosion problems creating
cmtdnions that affect the health, safety. welfare, and property of the
residents of the Co;nVy of San Bernardino, in that the improper and
untimely disturbance of the surface or subsurface of the land, the soil of
_
sslu Nt is coarse lectured and of a sandy nature, and because of its character
and the presence of strong prevailing winds, seasonal and otherwise, it is
_
progressively being eroded by winds and blown in substantial qu;niut5 onto
puhlic roads, and other public and pnvatc property.
'file Board of Supervisors further finds that these condilions are more
•` `r-
prevalent and more in need of immediate correction within the boundaries as
more parucula rly d ^scribed in See boll 6= 013 of this chapter.
359
62.012 - 62.014 LAND USE. BUILDING REGULNTIONS
6'.012 Permit Requirement.
It shall he unlawful for any person. firm. or corporation. or any
thereof !to owns or is in possession or control of land to disturb the surface
or stibliLr"ice of land by eulu%aunp, discire. plco6ne.
-
noble r1adine, r-anioN:iiQ residues. natural or planted. tree. tine Or Too[ Crops.
-utung or spreading a substantial quantity of similar soil
or by distol: on said
land, or by any other action likely to cause or contribute to wind erosion of
1-era,ate said erosion thereon within the area described Ea:d ILnd. or to a, bed in
ection 61014 of this chapter, at any t first having obtained a ime without f
•21A perrit therefor and having complied with the terms of said permit as
orc, ded for in INS chapter.
62.013 Prevention of Dust Storms.
To conserve the natural resources within the area described in Section
62.014 of this chapter. and to minimize the injurious effects of dust Storms,
'—p
the owner and all persons in possession of real property within said area shall
prevent dust I'l(MkIng thCTefrOM. as nearly as that can be done by the is Ij ne
of reasonable measures and means.
-C- i*
62.014 Territory Boundaries.
The prmiqions of this charter shall apply to all that territory Included
,ilkiii, the exicnor boundaries described as follows;
State or California. County of San Bernardino, beginti at the north
quarter corner of Section 26. TIN, R7W, SBB%I:
1. Thence cast alone section lines to an intersection with the range
ine bet,ccn R7W and R60W.
2. Thence along said range line to the northwest comer of
Section 30, TIN, RoW. SBBNI:
3. Thence cast along section lines to the ri corner of
Section 29, Same township and range;
4. Thence South along section lines to an intersection with the San
Beina.jino Base Line;
5. Thence along said line to the northeast corner of Section 5, TI S.
R6%V, SBB\I:
6. Thence south along Section lines to the northwest corner of
Section 10. same township and ranee;
7. Thcnce cast along the section line to the north quarter corner of
said Section 16;
S. Thence South along the north and south quarter WCtiOn line Of
said Section 16, and comill inc soijill along the north and south quarter ,P
section line of Sections '_I, '8. and 33, same township and range. to the
South line of said Section 33;
9. Thence west along the township line between TiS and T'S toan
intersection with the range line between R6W and R-,W;
1113,1791 460
Z i� ......
........ . c.
10. Thence south along said line to the southeast corner of Section 13,
T3S. P.7W, SBB \I;
II. 'trio rice west along section line to the southwest corner of
Section 14, same township and range;
;t ,
. 12. Thence north along said section line to the southwest corner of
-
Section 2, same township and range:
13. Thence west along section lines to the southwest comer of
• Government Lot 6 of Section 3, same township and ranee:
14. Thence north alone the west Tine of Government Lots 6, 5, 4,
and 3 of said Section 3 to an intersection with the townshi p line between
-,+,
TIS and'P_S;
�;•apy
•�
15. Thence west along said line to the south quarter comer of
, :,,;
Section 33, 1*1 S, RM, SUB ?t;
16. Thence north along the north and south quarter section line of
said Section 33, and continuing north along the north and south quarter
-
section line of Section 28, same township and range, to an intersection with
-
the northeast line of the Onion Pacific Railway Company's right of way;
17. Thence northwest alone said line to an intersection with the west
�_•.`''- "�'"'
Une orsaid Section 28:
18. Thence north along section lines to an intersection with the
westerly prolongation of the south line of Parcel No. 2, as shown on State
Board of Equalization Land Identification )lap No. 804 -36 -2, said map
-
sholin.g the neht o(wa} ofthe .A.T.&.S.F. Railway Co.;
- -
19. Thence cast along said prolongation and litre to the southeast
corner of said parcel No. 2;
2o. 'thence across Vineyard Avenue to the southwest comer of Parcel
No 3 as shown on said map;
21. Thence east along the south line of said Parcel No., 3 to the
-' W. =H
southeast corner of said Parcel No. 3;
22. Thence across Heiman Avenue to the southwest comer of Parcel'
"�`
No. 4 as shown on said map:
23. Thence east along the south Gne of said Parcel No.4 and its
Prolongation to an intersection with the west line of Section 14, TIS, R7W,
S13 Bit;
24. Thence north along section lines to the southwest comer of
7,
Section 2, same township and ran ^_e:
_
25. 3hence cast alone the sectimi line to an intcrscction with the west
line of Ilie cast half of the west half of sand Section 2:
26. '(hence north along said line to an inlcrsettion wrth the cast and
_
west quarter seem +n line of %aid Section -.
_
..,
27. Th:•nce cast : lane said line to an intersection with the west line of
_I Section I, soma township ind rave;
28. 'thence nnrlh Anne mid line to all intersection wnh the San
Bernardino Bdse Litre:
29. Thence along said Iine to the southwest corner of Section 36,
-
TIN,R7W.SBBM
461 �,.-. lr;nnvl
.,yr •,.'�•;'
62 015 - 62.017 LAND USE. BUILDING REGULATIONS
30. Thence north along section lines to an interscclion with the south -
Gne of the north half of the south half of Section '_6, same townslup and
ranee;
31. Thence west along said line to an intersection uvith the north and -
south quarter section line of said Section 26: -
32. Thence north along said line to the north quarter corner of said -
_
Section 26, the point of beginning.
62 01 S Permit.
Is) APPLICATION, App'i:,.tion for the permit required by this
chapter shall be made in writing to the County Agricultural Commissioner
on furors provided by the County for this purpose, and shall set forth such
information required to enable the Agricultural Commissioner or his deputy
to fix and prescribe appropriate conditions which will prevent or minimize
wind erosion of the permittee's soil.
(b) PERMIT CO \DITIO \3. The permit shall be subject to such
econorlically feasible condi' :ens as the .Agricultural Commissioner may=
require which will a,urc that Surface protection at or prior to the time of
the disturbance of the surface or subsurface cif the land is provided for. so as
to prevent the soil on said land from being eroded by wind and blown onto
public roads or other public or private property. Such protective measures as
reg:dred by said Agricultural Commissioner shall be provided by means of
aan-u Lural measures, or any other effective method or combination of
methods of holding the soil in place as determined by the Soil Erosion and
Dust Prevention Commission.
(c) APPEAL FROM DENTAL OF PERMIT OR PERMIT
CONDITIONS. Any applicant may appeal to the Soil Erosion and Dust
Prevention Commission from the decision of the Agricultural Commissioner
in disapproting of a permit as required herein, or from the conditions of
approval imposed by said Agricultural Commissioner. The appeal shall be
taken in accordance with Section 62.018 of this chapter.
62.016 Fees.
The yearly fee for each permit issued shall be as set forth in the
Schedule of Fees, Section 16.0:1, of this Code. The permit shall nut from
November I to October .il of the next succeedinecalendar year.
62.017 Exemptions.
The protisions of this chapter shall not apply to the disturbance of the
surface or subsurface of the lend under the following circumstances:
(a) R'Iten such acti1ttes are required by another ordinance, statute.
rule, or regulation.
1113 ;1791 462
f?
L
l:
J
SAXD %NDSOIL EROSION 620IS- 67.0110
- -
-
(b) When necessary to grade, trench or otherwise install. repair, or
replace utility senices within the boundaries of utility or public rights of
-
fc) "'hen the disturbance or proposed actieity is confined to an ;ilea
-
Of one ( I ) acre or less.
- -
62.01 S Establishnn nt of the Soil Erosion and
- -
Dust Prevention Commission.
_ _-
The Soil Erosion and Dust Prevention Commission shall consist of seven
-
l7) regular members, appointed by, and seeing at the pleasure of, the body
appointing as set forth below, and each for a term of three (3) years. Four of
.
the members• three of which shall be actively encaeed in farming within the
`- ".`` ",r;',i;°` -" "�
area set forth Section 6 ^_.014, shall be appou :d by the Board of
... :':' ;_i
Supervisors; one member, representing the City of Ontario, shall be
-
appointed by that City Council: one member• representing the City of
_-
.�t. • -'R +'
Fontana, shall he appointed by that City Council; and one me;nber shall be
�� ; ;rr(`:�p,J: ;,!� ;'.5 ; % ; { > ;•, ;_
from the West End Resource D;stnct Board of Directors, and shall be
appointed by that body.
The Sod Erosion and Dust Prevention Commission shall hear appeals of
- -- - -
=�
any orders , requirements, decisions, determination or interpretation . the
'->
?.gricultura) Commissioner in the administration or enforcement of the
�
provisions of this chapter. Its decision shall be final.
6'_019 Annexation of Additional Territorv.
On the reconlnwndation of the Agricultural Commissioner and with the
-
anpmvel of the Board of Supervisors. additional areas can be annexed to the
area derari bed in Section 6'_.014 under the following conditions:
(a) Conditions exist that are stated in Section 6101 7.
;': +•�_:�'1 • ; -' =� .c; :: ;; ._
(b) Tlrc an'a is contiguous to the area described in Section 62.014.
62.0110 Notice.
In case anv land presents a hazardous :oindition that may affect the
-
health, safely and welfare of nei^hbormg land, roadways and residents
-
hecauve of the condition of the land with regard to loose soil and windv
-
comiitlons, the owner of record will be notified of such conditions by the
Commissioner or tits deputy. If, after proper notification of the hazardous
conditions. Ihcy are not corrected within file little limit set forth. which shall
he thirty UO) daps, the Commissioner fray order the properiv presenting
such conditions to lie corrected as reasonably and economicalh as pos<i hlc
in a.cordan:c aath the discretion of the Commissioner. The County Auditor
-
s11AI pm the cost of rich compliance from the funds of the Agricultural
-f
Cantmi „inner. The lutal cost of such a )r1plialice shall be computed and ;In
- s
ad 111171 'Sl ratne fee of hventy percent (:0'%) of such cost shall Ira addeJ
-
Illerel9. A bill for the dntlre skim Of the coils and acllnml5 Vat1v'C fee sll,ll he
nwiled to the record e•.vner of such land and a copy shall he sent to the
463 //.'31.)91
1
. y
n
r
G1.Oi 10 LAND USE, BUILDING REGULATIONS
'-
•_��
_
County Auditor. The bill shall include an itemized statement covering the
-
"•ork leceMMY for such abatement of hazardous condition. If the record
'
e'.vner of the !and Or Ills agent does not paj' the bill within thirty (30) days
I said maillne. the Commissioner sl +all certify to the Auditor the
demands remaining unpaid on said bill together with any information
_-
required by law in such cases. The County Auditor shall cause the amount of
the sa;ae to be entered on the tax roll as a special assessment and [ax Tien on
+_..��'.;� -t:
the property from which abatement of hazardous condition was
'•'Ty
acconlplishrd. TTe special ass,ssnlent shall be included on the next
_
'
succeeding tax statement. Thereafter the amounts of the assessment shall be
" '•'",•��^
celiect,d at the same time and in she same manner as County taxes
IU]In91 463
I
cei b: ctLd, and shall be subject to the same penalties, and the same pre -educe
'"" "'..' «r..;r "'= `' -' +t; '•'"
and r:e in cases of delinquencies as provided in ordinary taxes, All or anv
"-
pertion of such special assessment. penalty, or costs entered shall on order of
_
'`0c�- `�'�' "'��`,^'•f
she Board of Suprnisors be cancelled by the Auditor if uncollected
or
refunded by the County Treasurer under order of the Board of Sup: visors,
-
if assessment. penalty, or costs were entered, charged or paid:
(a) More than once;
(b) Through clerical error;
-
(c) ThrouEyh Ole error or mistake of the Board of Sup :visors or of the
m
Cenrasioner in Oespect to ally material fact including the case where the
-
_ ,ts re'tdered show the Canty abated the land, but such was net the fact:
(d) Illzgaily;
•.
(e) On propertv acquired after the lien by the State or any city,
== i,.,:;,
ccun!p, school district. or other political subdivision and because of this
-
purbe est'Ilcntup not subject to sale for delinquent taxes.
_
No order for refund under the foreco:ne shall be made except on a
?
claim xerified by the person who paid the special assessment or the
_
representative of such person or his estate and said claim is filed within three
- T•E•'t °'1 `:`- °'-'`(;.
(3) Years after making the payment to be refunded.
..._ _.. ... ...... .�. _
IU]In91 463
I
I
-
C-1
ORDINANCE NO. IS17
AN OPECINANCE OF THE COUNTY Of SAN BEPNAR.DINO. STATE OF
CALIFORNIA. AMENDING THE COUNTY CODE BY ADDING SECTION
620150 TO CHAPT? ?, 1 OF DnIAON 2 TITLE 6, TERTAINING TO SO L
DISTURBANCE PERMITS AND YIOUTIONS Of CONDTIONS Of SUCH
PEPHITS ALL PERTARLNG TO LAND IN THE WEST END AND
PARTICULARLY DESCIUBED IN SECTION 61.011 OF SAID CODE.
TN BwN d S,,emfon of I" Cmozy of SM klnerd.o, slue of CA'IfD o,
doer o u fAF,
SECTION I The SA, krwrd.e C.L, Code a Nrtb, Il otl fi W%
ketwe. 61.016(tl to ChWef I of Dw,000 1, Tdk 1, xkh rm000 "if rt+d u
(d) R ✓u1 k ud+h 'rc +nI perminee kI lin x +nFr1.00 Pro[ted 4
uMenN +utNmT d uaA + pma.:o woDU +n, d fN ¢mm or mndnoam d ud
R SECTION 1, TAa oNnurce ✓all rake lifer, thnry (10( don After 0 AWoo
ROBERT L HAMMOCK. CMmv..
BwN of
ATTEST
. ANDREE DISHARO ON. C0 d
fN Bo+L
STATE Of CALIFORNIA 1 u.
COUNTT OF AN BERNARDINO
I. ANDREE MSHAR00N, CkA of fk R -tl of Su r-on of 1k Co ,Iy of
Ln km+N.o, SA, d C+Idomu. Nrtb, «,,1 ftif +t + ,eM:+r .eon, of fk
Bab of;R, ,wn of ud Coo,Y k Sufe. NN a. tN 16th of of FM f, 081,
+:.AAA meet., were M.. Su,,,on Rohn L Ha . k. Cl —oo Boo
O4ke OI ldl—n. D++1d L, M<Kmm. Rohn 0 Towntood."the CkA d,e
fore,mn, ord wrce w wtwd "+dI F7 fk fdkwm, rose to -1
ATES w%mwa Older. HtEMo. M<Kenm, To—,ol Wmrral
NOES N.
AP.SENT Nox
IN WITNESS WHEREOi, N.<Nm:n :o w ry bM+M +Bred tle ofi(ol wl
of fM BwN of S,tor, Fn 161h d+F of F,bm,, 1181
ANCREE D�SHlQ'JON,
Ckn of fN Bo+b or Su %mwn
of the County of S+o krmNoo.
Sule of G:do,00
L
�4 1
Because of publishing requirements, it is requested that the second reading
be set for the August 5th Council meeting.
E
IV
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE, 8 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAP-
TER 8.16 TO TITLE 0 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CHAPTER 1
OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 6 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY CODE (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 62.011) TO
PROVIDE FOR THE CONTROL OF BLWING SAND AND SOIL
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does Ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mu^ cipal Code
is here y amended by adding a new Chapter 8.16 thereto consisting
of the title and sections 0.16.010 through 8.16.060, inclusive,
to read as follows:
"Clap ter 8.16
"CONTROL OF BLOWING SAND AND PREVENTION OF SOIL
ERA OSl— p gY WINO
"Sections:
"8.16,010 Adoption of Chapter 1 of Division 2 of
Title 6 of the San Bernardino County Code
providing for the control of blowing sand
and soil erosion.
"8.16.020 Definitions.
"8.16.030 Applicability.
"8.16.040 Permits, fees, and enforcement.
"8.16.050 Notice.
"8.16,060 Inapplicability of provisions to weed
abatement.
'8.16.010 Adoption of Chapter 1 of Division 2 of
Title 6 of the San Dernardino aunty Co a provr.inGT. or
t e contra of blowro san an sot erosron. For the pur-
pose o. contra ing b owing sap an preventing soil eros-
ion by wind within the City limits of the City, Chapter 1
of Divinion 2 of.Title 6 of the San Bernardino County Code
entitled 'Control of Dlowinc Sand and Soil Erosion', three
(31 copies of which are on .file in the Office of the City
Clerk for public record and inspection, are hereby adopted
by reference and made a part of this chapter as thcuch set
forth in this chapter in full, suhlect, however, to the
Amenduents, additions, and deletions set forth in this chap-
ter.
"8.15,020 Der:nitzans. .rhenever the tom 'Count;" or
'Cv un br of San UcrwrSi nti'is used in the p.rtil,.7, of the
San Nrrnardire CVUnty Code referred to in Seetiun 9,16.010
of this chapter, the term 'City' pr 'City of Rancho Cuc,i-
monga' shall Lc substituted therefor.
"0.16.01_1 A,,rliCibilit;;. The provisions of this c`np-
ter shy% ho anplicaUhto ail lands now within, or heic-
aftCr anne>.cd to, tlu City lying within the tcrr,torlal
boundaries describod in Sec taon 62.014 of the San ^ernar-
dinu County Cade.
C1!
FJ
"8.16.040 Permits, fees, and enforcement. All
permits shall be issued by, and all administrative en-
forcement proceedings shall be conducted by, the Agri-
, cultural Commissioner of the County and the Soil Eros-
ion and Dust Prevention Commission of the County. All
fees and costs shall be paid to the County.
"8.16.050 Notice. Section 62.0110 of the San Bern-
ardino County Code is hereby amended by deleting there-
from the words 'Board of Supervisors' wherever said words
appear and substituting therefor the words 'City Council'.
"8.16.060 Inapplicability of provisions to weed
abatement. The provisions of thrs chapter shall not be
applicable in cases of the abatement of weeds declared to
be a public nuisance and ordered abated pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 9 of this title.
"8.16.070 Violation penalty. No person shall vio-
late any provision or fail to comply with any of the re-
quirements of this chapter, the provisions of the San
Bernardino County Code adopted herein by reference, or
any secondary code referred to therein. Any person vio-
lating any of the provisions or failing to comply with
any of the mandatory requirements of this chanter, the
provisions of the San Bernardino County Code adopted here-
in by reference, or any secondary code referred to there-
in, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction,
shall be punishable by fine of not more than $500.00, or
by imprisonment for a Period not exceeding six (6) months,
or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each person shall
be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day
during any portion of which the violation of any provis-
ion is committed, continued or permitted by such person,
and shall be punishable accordingly. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after
its passage, at least once in The P_aj_Ij Report, a newspaper of
general circulation, published inn the City of Ontario, California,
and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of
1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APT F.ST:
/v�
CITY OF RAN040 (XUANIONr,A �G�'c ^•N�
STAFF REPORT
U
1977
Janaury 14, 1981
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, eietyManager
SUBJECT: Recommended Adoption Solid Waste Management Master Plan Revision
As the City Council is aware, the City has previously adopted the County
of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Master Plan. The original
document, although adopted in October of 1975, was approved by the City
Council in August of 1979.
The primary revisions of the Solid Waste Management Master Plan have
been made to the objectives with the creation of seven programs involving:
Waste Storage Collection and Transportation Programs; Waste Disposal
Improvement Programs; Resource Energy Recovery and Conservation Program;
Hazardous Waste Management Program; Education and Information Program;
Litter and Indiscriminate Dumping Program; and Waste Management Admini-
strative and Enforcement Program.
In addition the report notes that the sanitary landfill sites in Yacaipa,
Cajon, Fontana and Colton are anticipated to close by 1980, 1982, and 1984
respectively.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolu-
tion 81 -6 concurring with the goals and objectives of the
Solid Waste Management Master Plan Update.
LMW /vz
Enclosure
V ,�
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE REVISED SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN.
WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted the Solid Waste
Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972 (Sections 66700- 66793,
Goverment Code); and
WHEREAS, said Act requires each County to prepare a Solid
Waste Management Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 66780.5 of said Goverment Code requires that
the Master Plan be revised at least every three years from the date of
initial approval; and
WHEREAS, the original Solid Waste Management Master was approved
by a majority of the cities containing a majority of the population of
the incorporated areas in 1975; and
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has
authorized revision of the said plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 66780 of said Government Code requires the
revised Solid Waste Management Master Plan for San Bernardino County be
approved by a majority of the cities containing a majority of the population
of the incorporated area; and
to WHEREAS, said Master Plan has been reviewed by the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby approve said Master Plan and concurs
in the objectives set forth in the Master Plan; the methods and organization
for implementation of the programs; procedures for financing recommended
programs; and the role identified in the plan for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED the day of , 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
CITY OF RA \CHO CCG \JIOXGA
STAFF REPORT
F UW
GATE: July 1, 1981
1977
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Barry K. Mogan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CABLE T.V.
ABSTRACT: At the request of the Planning Commission, staff prepared
a report examining the issue of requiring installation of Cable TV as
apart of Tentative Tract Map approvals. The report was presented on
May 27, 1981, at which time the Planning Commission moved to recommend
to the City Council the development ofa Cable TV Franchise Ordinance.
Since that time, however, staff has learned that the County Franchise
Ordinance for Cable TV was adopted by reference as a part of the County
Code. A copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report and County Fran-
chise Ordinance is attached for your review and consideration. We are
seeking direction on this issue.
BACKGROUND: In the review of tentative subdivisions, the Planning
• Commission became concerned with how, when, and where Cable TV infra-
structure should be provided in new development. The attached Staff
Report details the history, technical, and economic aspects of Cable
Television and presented policy options to the Planning Commission for
their review and consideration. After discussion of the report the
Planning Commission moved to recommend to the City Council the develop-
ment of a Cable TV Franchise Ordinance in order to require Cable TV
infrastructure in all new development within the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga. Additionally, they requested that the Commission has the
opportunity to review the provisions of the Franchise Ordinance before
adoption. Since that meeting, it has come to the attention of staff
that the City Council, with the adoption of Ordinance No. 17 on March
29, 1978, has adopted by reference the San Bernardino County Code,
which includes a chapter pertaining to community antenna television
systems. A copy of this chapter has been attached for your information.
The code sections contained in this chapter establish the licensing
franchising procedures for community antenna television systems and
adopts operating rules and regulations.
According to the Communications Department of the County of San Bernar-
dino there are 3 cable TV companies with valid franchises to operate
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga:
1, Cable TV of Alta Loma
2. Rialto Cable Management Company (aka Visual
Enterprises)
3. Theta Cable Television
IC) o
E
Is
-2-
Additionally, since the Cable TV issue appeared before the Planning
Commission on May 27, 1981, the City has received numerous inquiries
from cable television companies desiring to operate in the City.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and
consider all material and input relative to cable television and provide
staff with direction.
/ Ci ty,Pl and
BKH:DC:cd
V
Attachments:
tted,
Planning Commission Staff Report
County Code Sections 42.050 through 42.0516 -
Community Antenna Television Systems
Letter from BIA
Letter from Lewis Homes
N
lu
r 1i
U
A
CITY OF RANCHO CCC, VIONGA
STAFF REPC:I- i
DATE: May 27, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CABLE T.V.
�O CvICAX124, 7
O O
U >
1977
INTRODUCTION: Recently, in conjunction with the approval of tentative
tract maps, questions have been raised concerning cable television.
- What areas of Rancho Cucamonga already have Cable T.V.?
- Who is responsible for installing a cable system, and
who pays for the installation?
- What is Cable T.V.?
- Do we need it in Rancho Cucamonga?
- If Cable T.V. is desirable, should the Planning Commission
require developers to install cable as a condition of ap-
proval on a subdivision?
This report explains cable television in layman's terms, and provides
background material necessary to answer these questions.
WHAT IS CABLE T.V.?
Cable television began on a modest scale in the late 1940's as a
means of delivering television signals to areas unable to receive
over - the -air T.V. channels because they were too far from the trans-
mitters or obstructed by mountains. By installing an antenna on top
of the mountain or closer to the transmitter, a stronger signal could
be sent via cable to the home television set. Thus, in its early
days, cable was primarily away of improving reception. Advances in
the state -of- the -art have created a billion dollar a year cable tele-
vision industry. With the advent of satellite programming, dish an-
tennas can now pick up and relay signals from satellites, making it
possible to offer a wide spectrum of entertainment choices for the
T.V. viewer.
There are two kinds of cable T.V. hookups:
Basic Cable: A consumer pays an installation charge and
a monthly fee to have his T.V. set hooked up to cable.
This enables the viewer to watch all twelve VHF channels,
including some out -of- the -area stations, and possibly
more UHF channels. Basic cable is used primarily by the
consumer for better reception.
I/O ITEM L
Caimle r.J981 (.
Page Two
Pay Cable: for extra monthly charges the consumer can •
purchase premium services, such as Home Box Office, Show -
time,' or "Z" channel. Any such service that a subscriber
receives through cable is considered pay cable. What the
consumer really pays for is a "convertor box" for the
television set that enables it to receive additional chan-
nels. Pay cable systems, which can bring up to 64 channels,
typically offer uncut movies, 24 -hour sports channels, Con-
gressional coverage, religious channels, children's and
adult programming, Spanish- speaking channels, and in some
areas, even local city council meetings.
Cable television faces competition from other non -cable pay -T.V. services:
Subscription Television: The consumer pays the usual in-
stallation charge and monthly fee in return for a "decoder
box" that decodes or unscrambles a transmission for recep-
tion on the television set. In Southern California, the two
largest subscription television (STV) operators, ON -TV and
SELECT -TV, offer movies and sports. As a non -cable system,
STV offers only one channel and television reception is not
improved.
Multipoint Distribution Service: A television transmission
is delivered, via microwaves, to a home dish antenna con-
nected to the TV set. The consumer pays an installation •
charge and monthly fee to lease the antenna. The problem
with multipoint distribution service (MOS) is a limited range
of 25 miles and it requires the receiving antenna to be in
the line of sight of the transmitter.
Satellite Television: Potentially cable T.V.'s biggest
competitor is direct satellite to home transmission. In
this case each house would have its own dish antenna capable
of receiving as many Signals as the satellite can beam, thus
making each home a private cable system. Home Box Office
customers can pay $125 for an antenna unit to receive HBO's
satellite programming in areas without cable.
lJ
May 27,,.1981
Cable T.V.
Page Three
n
The programming possibilities for cable television are virtually in-
finite, depending only upon what the consumer is willing to pay for.
The list below, from Theta Cable T.V.,is an example of the wide va-
riety of programming currently available to the cable T.V. consumer.
Channel
Setting Programming
•Z THETA NIOTION PICTURES
2 KNXT CH. 2 C.B.S.
3 Theta Channel 3
4 KNBC CH. 4 N.B.C.
5 KTLA CH. 5 IND.
6 KCET CH. 28 P.B.S.
7 KABC CH, 7 A.B.C.
8 KMEX CH. 34 IND./
Sports Headlines
9 KHJ CH. 9 IND.
10 KWHY CH. 22I14D.
I I KTTV CH. I I IND.
12 KBSC CH. 52 IND.
13 KCOP CH. 13 IND.
A SHOW'TISIE (hbw Sa6runpaert
TV Service. Meister, L. Peg.
and Broadway Specials.)
B KVCR CH. 24 P.B.S.
.
C Comparative Shopping Guide
D Local Time and Weather/
24 Hour Service
E Local School. Educational Use
F KSCI CH. 18
Financial News —UPI
G New York Stock Exchange
' H KHOF CH. 30 REL.
I KTBN CH. 40 REL.
1 WTBS 24 -Hour Super Station
from Atlanta. Excising Sports.
Movies, Features.
K ESPN All-Sports Satellite
Channel. 17+ Hours Per Day.
NCAA /Pro Sports.
L KLCS CH. 58 ED.
M Satellite Programming: CNN.
(Turner 24 -Hour All-News
Station). La Verne restdents-
see Channel 3.
N Samlhtu Proernmm,rg Guide,
ESPN /W'TBS
O Sports Scurebourd/
24 Ilnur Service ( %I uac
Background Slutcd).
P Reereallonal Weather
Nesys /24 -Ilour Serncc
WHO HAS CABLE T.V. IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA?
Like a public utility, cable companies can only do business if they are
awarded a franchise from the local governing body. The San Bernardino
County Board of Supervisors awarded non - exclusive franchises to four
cable T.V. operators for the Rancho Cucamonga area prior to incorporation.
These franchises do not specify levels of service or define service areas.
n
Cable T.V.
May 27, 1981
Page Four
One franchise holder, Six -Star Cablevision presently does not provide
service in the City. The oldest cable company in Rancho Cucamonga,
Visual Enterprises Venture, laid cable twelve years ago in Alta Loma.
Visuals' 700 subscribers receive all VHF and UHF channels plus Home
Box Office (movies and sports). Cable T.V. of Alta Loma has 1,985
subscribers and offers 17 channels and "Z" channel (movies). In the
Cucamonga area, Theta Cable T.V. offers its 800 customers 27 channels,
"Z" channel (Theta Motion Pictures), and Showtime (movies, Las Vegas
and Broadway specials). The map below indicates cable T.V. service
areas as of January 1981.
CABLE TV SERVICE AREAS
[� Cable TV of Alta Loma
(� Theta Cable TV
® VlS" Enle,pnaes V ntu,e
u
—_J
•
Cable T.V.
May 27, 1981
Page Five
HOW CABLE T. V. WORKS
The problem with conventional television boradcasts is that some
stations have less powerful transmitters than others. That's why
Channel 2 may come in "picture perfect" on your T,V, set, while
Channel 13 reception is weak and "snowy ". To resolve this problem,
cable operators place amplifiers in the cable every 1 to 2 thousand
feet to maintain the strength or "integrity" of the signal, There-
fore, in a cable system, the television set receiyes,all channels
at virtually the same optimum signal strength,
All cable systems start with a "head -in" station that consists of
a separate T.V. antenna for each channel. The function of the head -
in station is to receive and amplify each channel for distribution
to the home. Those cable systems featuring satellite programming
also have an "earth" or "ground" station with a large dish antenna
to receive satellite transmissions, From these receiving stations
the T.V. signal is sent to a community via a main trunk cable, Ge-
nerally speaking, trunk cable is an overhead line hung on the same
poles as telephone and electric lines; this is known as an aerial
plant. Smaller cable, known as distribution or feeder line, branches
off from the trunk and delivers the television signal to each.tract.
The State Subdivision Nap Act requires all utilities to be installed
underground in new subdivisions. This means that cable companies
are unable to use an aerial plant for their feeder lines, and therefore,
lay their distribution lines up each street in the same trench with
the utilities. There are two kinds of underground plant for cable
television: direct - buried and dry -line (conduit). The direct -
buried system uses "armored" cable that has a protective layer of
corrugated metal, This type of cable is laid directly into the
trench, in a bed of sand, A dry -line system means that cable is
run through PVC plastic conduit for protection. Both types of under-
ground plant use "flooded and jacketed" cable that is treated with a
special water proofing compound,
A device called a tap is used to connect the lateral "drop" cable
to the house with the distrubiton line in the street. Each tap is
enclosed in a concrete or plastic vault called a tap box, which
normally occurs every four homes. Sometimes an above - ground pedestal
enclosure is used for a tap, usually in the backyard. Each home, in
turn, is "wired" with wall outlets for the cable, similar to a phone
1 �I
Cable T.V.
May 27, 1981
Page Six
jack outlet. In the case of basic cable service, a cable runs from
the wall outlet to the television set. If the consumer has pay
cable service, with a converter, then the cable goes through the
converter to the T.V.
INSTALLATION COSTS
Because of the high cost of installing cable infrastructure, it is
estimated that for the next 10 years, the cable T.U. industry will
need $14 billion in capital to build new systems and rebuild old
ones. The high cost is attributed to the large number of cost va-
riables involved; such as, the type of plant, when the cable is
installed (during or after completion of a tract), soil type, and
the number of street intersection crossings. All of these factors
can significantly affect the cost of laying cable and any figures
used herein should be interpreted with this in mind.
The most important financial consideration to a cable company, in
terms of installing cable, is when the cable is laid. Normally, cable
is laid in the same trench with utilities during construction. This
saves the cable company the cost of trenching, which can range from •
$5,000 a mile in good soil to $11,000 a mile in the rocky soil of
Alta Loma. The price for laying underground cable is about $12,000
a mile for dry -line and $8,000 a mile for direct - buried.
Theta Cable T.V. uses a dry -line system for their installation;
citing the high maintenance costs associated with direct - buried
cable as the reason for using conduit. Cable laid using the direct -
buried system, although it has a protective casing, is susceptible
to damage from rocks that can dent the cable. Repair of direct -
buried cable requires excavation to expose the cable for repair;
hence, the added cost of trenching, backfilling, and repairing. In
a dry -line system, "pull boxes" are spaced along the conduit with a
rope inside that is used to pull cable free of the conduit for repairs.
Cable T.V. of Alta Loma and Visual Enterprises Venture prefer a
direct - buried system because of the lower capital outlay for instal-
lation.
Because of the high cost of laying cable, cable operators are very
concerned with the "saturation factor ": the percentage of homes in
an area that subscribe to cable. Most cable companies will only provide
H5_
Cable T.V,
May 27, 1981
Page Seven
cable service in areas where they can expect a 40 -50 percent sub-
scription rate. "It takes a 33 -35 percent subscription rate just to
break even," according to Don Canfield of Theta Cable T.V. Cable
T.V. is a high -risk business; accordingly, cable companies expect
a 19 to 20 percent return on their investment. Cable T.V. of Alta
Loma estimates that they must reach or "expose" fifty homes per mile
of plant (at a 50% saturation factor) to make a reasonable profit.
Therefore, cable companies will not run underground cable to a new
area just to expose a small tract of 20 or 30 homes. If, however,
reception in this area was so poor that they could expect a 90 to
100 percent subscription rate, or if CC &Rs prohibited antennas,
then it would be economically justifiable to lay trunk or distri-
bution lines.
ANALYSIS: In considering attaching conditions to tentative tract
maps to require cable installation, not only should the cost to extend
cable company distribution and trunk lines be considered, the cost
per unit to the developer and the need for cable should be analyzed.
One of the problems in discussing cable T.V. is the disparity in cost
per dwelling unit figures used by various groups or individuals. The
disparity is caused by differences in what these figures represent in
terms of actual cable installation: discussing figures on installation
of a cable system is futile unless everyone agrees upon what goes into
that cable system. Case in point: the following condition was attach-
. ed to a recent approval of a tract in Upland.
Underground utility services shall include dry -line Cable
T.V. facilities. Provided further, that all dwelling units
shall be pre -wired for Cable T.V. service.
This type of "blanket condition" doesn't specify the size of conduit,
number of pullboxes, or how many cable T.V. outlets each home should
have. on the basis of this condition, it would be difficult to ar-
rive at a meaningful estimate of the cost per house.
To supply each house in a subdivision with cable requires
100 -200 feet of conduit (depending upon lot width and setbacks). A
2 -inch PVC conduit costs about 502 a foot, therefore, the cost of con-
duit per house is $50 to $60. Add to this the cost of pre - wiring each
home, labor, and pull boxes, and the total cost of providing cable ser-
vice begins to escalate. (In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, our standard
condition at this time requires the developer to provide cable televi-
sion conduit only.) For example, a recent 125 -lot subdivision in Ontario
cost about $60 to $70 per house to install a simple dry -line system,
not including the cost of pre - wiring each house. Ron Nottingham, En-
gineer for Lewis Homes, estimates that a complete dry -line cable T.V.
system would cost $300 per house, including 3 or 4 outlets in each
home at $10 apiece; but, unfortunately, could not itemize this figure.
Using costs supplied by the various Cable TV companies and actual con-
struction contracts, the following should be an accurate appraisal of
tip the actual cost to install a dry -line system.
Cable T.V-
May 27, 1981
Page Eight
$150 to $180 2" PVC Conduit, installed @ $1.50 lineal foot •
$22.50 N5 pullbox, installed @ $90 each, 1 box /4 homes
$172.50 - 205.00 Total without pre- wiring
+ $20.00 2 cable outlets
$192.50 - 225.00 Total with pre- wiring
Whatever the installation cost of cable is, if the developer is required
by conditions on a tentative map to install cable, the cost will ultimately
be transferred to the homebuyer in the price of the home. Regardless
of cost, builders resent being required to install what they consider
to be a luxury, cable T.V., just the same as if a city required them
to provide plumbing for a spa on each lot. Ken Willis, of the Building
Industry Association, summed up this attitude by saying, "we oppose it
on the basis that you are using one industry to subsidize another industry ".
The BIA feels that cable companies can afford to pay for the installation
of conduit through which they will receive profit. Thus, if the cable
company pays for the installation, this cost will be transferred to the
user as a part of the subscription charge.
The need for cable television in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is sup- '
ported by two thoughts; the growing use of Cable T.V. for entertain-
ment and the necessity for proper reception. Proponents of cable tele-
vision can argue the need for cable T.V. by pointing to the increasing
demand among consumers. In 1968 about 2.8 million, or 5% of the nation's
56 million T.U. homes had cable. Today that figure has climbed to 15.5
million, or 20% of the nation's 76.3 million T.V. homes, and indications
are that cable T.V. growth will continue to climb.
In "shaded" or poor reception areas, people talk about "needing" cable
TV so they can continue to enjoy television. Therefore, the saturation
factor (read popularity /demand) in Foothill communities is much higher
than in the valley floor. Alta Loma, particularly north of Banyan, is
a shaded area and 29% of all homes have cable T.V.
The present Cable T.V. companies are operating under a franchise agreement
approved and adopted by the County. Unless the City Council adopts its
own Cable TV Ordinance, the City cannot specify to cable companies where
and 'now service must be provided. If the Council adopts such an ordinance
and grants new franchises, then precise installation requirements could
be imposed on the cable company. As it now exists, cable companies will
provide service only in areas where economically feasible; i.e., where
trunk, lines exist and extensions from the main line can be made without
substantial cost. Some subdivisions have been pre - wired, but still do
not enjoy service because the main trunk line is not in close proximity
and may never be, without major improvement costs.
11 --7
Cable T.V. l
May 27, 1981
Page Nine
• POLICY OPTIONS
The following is a list of policy options available to the Commission
with regard to Cable T.Y.
1. Allow developers to work freely with cable companies
in deciding which tracts should be provided with cable
T.V. Basically, a "no policy" stance, would be maintained
until the Council considers adoption of an ordinance and
franchises.
2. Recommend tb the City Council a franchise ordinance be
adopted.
3. Require cable T.V. facilities only in areas of the
community with poor reception.
4. Require cable T.V. facilities in poor reception areas
which are presently served and accessible to a cable
company.
5. Condition all subdivisions to provide cable T.V. facilities
in conjunction with the approval of tentative tract maps.
. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
review and consider all aspects of this issue, and provide Staff
with direction.
BKH:DC:cd:jk:kp:nm
Is
tted,
II1�
C
I
42.050 - 42.051 BUSINESS, SPECIAL LICENSES
Chapter 5
COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION SYSTEMS
Section:
42.050 Application.
42.051 Definitions.
42.052 License to Install and Operate,
42.053 Complaint Procedure,
42.054 Operation Charge.
42.055 License Term: Duration and Termination.
41056 Applications for License.
41057 Bonds: Indemnifications: Insurance.
42,058 County Dept. of Transportation Permit.
42,059 Construction Requirements.
' 42.0510 Right of County to Alter Streets
or Public Places,
42.0511 Limitations of License.
42.0512 Rights Reserved to the County.
42.0513 Rules and Regulations.
42.0514 Violations.
42.0515 Exchange of Franchise or License.
42.0516 Consistency with Section 76.31 of the
•
Federal Communications Commission
Regulations.
42.050 Application.
-'" -• ^• Only provisions in this chapter concerning complaint and termination
_
procedures and the rates charged for various subscriber services shall apply to
all existing licensed or franchised operating community antenna systems in
this County, unless Federal Communications Commission regulations require
all of the provisions in this chapter to apply. All of the provisions apply to
licenses issued pursuant to this chapter.
42.051 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms, phruses, words,
ahbrevimi0ns. and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein.
When not incamietcnt with the context, words used in the present tense
include the future WTISC. words in the Plural number include the singular
number. and words in the singular munher Include the plural number
/
(a) "County" shall mean all unincurpuralcd areas within the
\
hounuhrles of Sdn Bernardino I. ounit '.
(b) "Boaul of 511 i1•rs UOri• shall mean the Board of Supervisors of the
,
County of Sall Bernardino or dnv future board constituting the legislative
body of the County.
!6''lPl6! 254
.
0
C< "Board of Appeals' shall mean that board comprised of three
persons to hear requests for changes in rtlte9 and service charges and appeal
of subscriber complaints.
Ill "Consumer Affairs" shall mean the Consumer Affairs section of
the Department of Weights and Measures and Consumer Affairs.
(e) "Director' shall mean the Director of Communications and
Emergency Services for the County.
In "License" shall mean and include any authorization granted
hereunder in terms of a license privilege, permit. license. or otherwise to
construct. operate and maintain a cable television system within all or a
specified area in the unincorporated area of the County. Any such
authorization. in whatever form granted. shall not mean and include any
license or permit required for the privilege of ransacting and carrying on a
business within the County as required by other chapters of this Code and
the laws of this County.
(g) "Person" shall mean any natural person and all domestic and
foreign corporations, associations. syndicates. joint stock corporations,
partnerships of every kind. clubs, business or common law trusts, and
societies.
(h) "License" shall meal the person, firm or corporation granted a
y. license by the Board of Supervisors under this chapter. and the lawful
successor, transferee or assignee of said person. firm or corporation.
III "Street and Road" shall mean the surface, the air space above the
surface and the area below the surface of any public street, public right of
way or public place. including Public - utility easements.
(j) "Property of Licensee" shall mean all property owned, installed,
or used within the County by a licensee in the conduct of a cable television
system business under the authority of a license granted pursuant to this
chapter.
(k) "Subscriber" or "User" shall mean any person or entity receiving
for any purpose any service of the licensee's cable television system
including. but not linnited lo, the conventional cable television system service
or retransmission of television broadcaa. radio signals. licensees original
cahlecuting. and the local government, education and public- access
channels; and other urvices. such as leasing of channels, daw and facsimile
lrmismission, pay television, and police. fire. and similar public service
c0111111nll10110n.
(1) "('able tole, islon system." "CATV" and "CTV" for the purposes
of tllis ehaptee are wrniS describing a systcnl 011111100119 antennae,
nucrowave. wires. wave guides. eoasial cables, or other conductors,
( equipment or laciliucs. dl constructed or used for the purpose of:
(1) collecting and anplif ing local and disuat broadcast
(cle,isron Or radio signals and dnlributine and transmitting them:
12) transnultma Original cablvcast programming not received
through broadcast signals:
COMMUNITY ANTENNA TV SYSTEMS 42.051
255 16.20,161
IPC)
42.052 — 42.053 BUSINESS, SPECIAL LICENSES I •
C�
(3) transmitting television pictures, film and video- tape
programs, not received through broadcast television signals, whether or not
encoded or processed to permit reception by only selected receivers:
(4) transmitting and receiving all other signals, digital, voice, and
audio - visual.
42.052 License to Install and Operate.
(a) A nonexclusive license to install, construct, operate and maintain a
cable television system on streets within all or a specific portion of the
County may be granted by the Board of Supervisors to any person, whether
operating under an existing license, who or which offers to furnish and
provide such system under and pursuant to the terms and provisions of this
chapter.
No provision of this chapter may be deemed or construed as to
require the granting of a license when in the opinion of the Board of
Supervisors it is in the public interest to restrict the number of licensees to
one or more.
(b) When and in the event that the licensee of any license granted
hereunder uses in his cable television system distribution channels fumished
to the licensee by 3 telephone company pursuant to tariff or contract on file C _
with a regulatory body having jurisdiction and said licensee makes no use of
'
the streets independent of such telephone - company - furnished facilities,
said licensee shall be required to comply with all of the provisions hereof as a
licensee.
(c) USES PERMITTED. Any license granted pursuant to the .
provisions of this chapter shall authorize and permit the licensee to engage in
the business of operating and providing a cable television system in the
County, and for that purpose to erect, install, construct, repair, replace,
reconstruct, maintain and retain in, on, over, under, upon, across and along
any street, public easements and public rights of way, such poles, wires,
cables, conductors, ducts, conduits, vaults. manholes, amplifiers, and
appliances, attachments and other property as may be necessary and
appurtenant to the cable television system: and, in addition, so to use,
operate, and provide similar facilities or properties rented or leased from
other persons, firms or corporafions, including but not limited to any public
utility or other licensee licensed or permitted to do business in the County.
4.053 Complaint Procedure.
(it) SUBSCRIBER COMPLAINTS. In addition to other service
reg il:ruons adopted by the Board of Supervisors and excepting I
circumstances beyond hcrnsee's comrul, such as Acts of God, riots and civil \ �.
disturh.mces, and in providing the foregoing services, the licensee shall.
( I) Luntf degradation of signals or system muage to a millinumf
time duration by locating and correcting malt'unctiomng promptly.
Correeuon of nhalfuncruons shall be completed within a reasonable time.
1636161 25h
0 COMMUNITY ANTENNA TV SYSTEMS 42,054
42.054 Operation Charge.
la) The license, during the term of this license, ah:dl pay to the
County in lawful money of the United Slales of America. one percent I If %1
of the liacmwe's gross subscriber revenues per )car (said revenues include all
forms of consideration such as initial lump sum payments) for the first three
131 years and tnso pareent I_'ll (it' the gross Subscriber rescnues per year
257 16 30761
h
(2) Upon complaint by a subscriber, make a demonstration
satisfactory to Consumer Affairs that a signal is being delivered which is of
sufficient strength and quality to meet the standards set forth in the
regulations of the Federal Communications Commission. Consumer Affairs
shall determine whether or not any adjustment in any rate or charge for the
complaining subscribers service should be made, If such an adjustment is
... -.... sni
determined by Consumer Affairs, that adjustment shall be made by the - - --
licensee.
(3) Render efficient service, making repairs promptly and
interrupting service only for good cause and for the shortest time possible.
Planned interruptions, insofar as possible, shall be preceded by notice given
to subscribers twenty -four ( 24) hours in advance and shall occur during
periods of minimum use of the system.
(4) Maintain a local business office or agents, which subscribers
troy telephone without incurring added message or toll charges so that
complaints and requests for repairs or adjustments may be received at any
time. and processed as described in (11. ('-) and (3) above. day or night,
seven days a week.
(5) In the event that the subscriber complaint cannot be settled
to the satisfaction of the subscriber and/or the licensee, the subscriber or the
licensee may appeal the determination of Consumer Affairs to the Board of
.
Appeals within ten 110) days of said determination.
(6) Appeal Procedure applies to any matter submitted to the
Board of Appeals under this chapter. Any matter submitted shall be in
writing and received by Consumer Affairs. Consumer Affairs shall set the
matter for hearing before the Board of Appeals which hearing shall be within
thirty (30) days and notify the appellant of the date set for such (tearing at
least fifteen (15) days prior to such date. The Board of Appeals shall act on
... ,, .,.,
the matter and its determination shall be final with regard to consumer
complaints. The decision of the Board of Appeals shall be issued within ten
(10) days of the hearing. The Board of Appeals shall consist of three (3)
persons and shall be comprised as follows: one member from Consumer
Affairs or the Communication and Emergency Services Department, either
of which member shall not have been assigned the matter under
consideration: one member shall be a deputy of the Administrator of the
Ocneral Services Agency; and one nlenlher shall be a representative of all
operating and licensed CATV system in the County, which member shall not
be involved in the mu Uer raider consideration.
42.054 Operation Charge.
la) The license, during the term of this license, ah:dl pay to the
County in lawful money of the United Slales of America. one percent I If %1
of the liacmwe's gross subscriber revenues per )car (said revenues include all
forms of consideration such as initial lump sum payments) for the first three
131 years and tnso pareent I_'ll (it' the gross Subscriber rescnues per year
257 16 30761
h
42.055 BUSINESS. SPECIAL LICENSES
thereafter, arising from the use, operation, or possession of said license
within said County. Existing franchises and licenses which are exchanged
pursuant to Section 42.0515 of this chapter shall pay two percent (2%) of
said revenue.
(b) The licensee shall file with the Clerk of the Board of $upervimrs
of the County, within sixty (60) days after the expiration of any calendar or
fiscal year during which such license is in force, a financial statement
prepared under penalty of perjury by an authorized representative of the
licensee showing in detail the gross annual receipts during the preceding
calendar year. It shall be the duty of the licensee to pay to the County
within thirty (30) days after the time for filing such statement any unpaid
balance for the calendar year by such statement. In the event that the above
payment is not received by the County within the specified time, the
licensee shall pay to the County a penalty of two percent (2%) per month on
the unpaid balance in addition thereto. The right is reserved to the County
of audit and recomputation of any amount paid under this chapter. No
acceptance of any payment shall be construed as a release or as an accord
and satisfaction of any claim the County may have set forth or additional
sums payable under this chapter or for the performance of any obligation
thereto.
42.055 License Term: Duration and Termination.
(a) The license granted by the Board of Supervisors under this chapter
shall be for a term of fifteen (1 5) years from the date of its acceptance by
the licensee. A license issued under this chapter may be renewed for a period
of ten ( 10) years for cacti renewal.
(b) The County may terminate any license granted pursuant to the
provisions of this chapter or previously granted franchise or license in the
event of the willful failure. refusal or neglect by licensee to do or comply
with any material requirement or limitation contained in this chapter, or any
material ride or regulation of the Board of Supervisors adopted pursuant to
thl5 chapter.
(c) Consumer Affairs may make written demand that the licensee do
or comply with any such requirement, limitation, temt, condition, rule or
regulation. if the failure, refusal or neglect of the licensee continues for a
period of thirty 130) days following such written demand. Consumer Affairs
may refer its rcqu 1't for temunauon of the license to the Board of Appeals.
(d) The Board of Appeals shall consider the request of Consumer
At tmrs and rhall hear any peraons interested therein. and shall determine, in
iK ducrenon. whether or not any faiure. refusal or neglect by the licensee
was with Just cauu.
(e) If AA11 tadure, relusat or neglect by the licensee was with just
cuu.c, the Board of Appeal, shall docct the licensee to comply within;uch
tune and manner and open such terms and conditions as are reasonable.
!6130161 253
n
C� •
• COMMUNITY ANTENNA TV SYSTEMS 42.056
CC
(I1 If the Board of Appeals shall determine such failure. refusal or
neglect by the licensee was without just Cause. then the Board of Appeals
may declare that the license of such licensee shall be terminated and
forfeited unless there be compliance by the licensee within such period as
the Board of Appeals may six.
(g) The decision of the Board of Appeals shall be final unless an
appeal in writing is filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors within --
. thirty (30) calendar days of the mailing of the said decision.
(h) The termination and forfeiture of any license shall in no way
affect any of the rights of the County under the license or any provision of
law.
42.056 Applications for License.
(a) Each application for a license to construct, operate or maintain
any cable television system in this County shall be filed with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and shall contain or be accompanied by the following:
(1) The name, address. and telephone number of the applicant:
CC (2) A detailed statement of the corporate or other business
entity organization of the applicant. including but not limited to, the
. following and to whatever extent required by the County:
(A) The names, residence and business addresses of all
officers, directors, and associates of the applicant.
(B) The names. residence and business addresses of all
officers. persons and entities having. controlling, or being entitled to have
control of live percent (57) or more of the ownership of the applicant and
the respective ownership share of each such person or entity.
(C) The names and addresses of any parent or subsidiary of
the applicant. namely, any other business entity owning or controlling
applicant in whole or in part or owned or controlled in whole or in part by
the applicant, and a statement describing the nature of any such parent or
subsidiary business entity. including but not limited to cable television
systems owned or controlled by the applicant, its parent and subsidiary and
the areas served thereby.
(D) A detailed description of all previous experience of the
applicant in providing cable television system service in related or similar
rielde.
(E) A detailed and complete financial statement of the
applicant. prepared by a certified public accountant. for the fiscal year nexl
preceding the date of the application hereunder, or a letter or other
acceptable evidence in writing from a recognized lending institution or
funding source, addressed to hoth the applicant and the Board of Supen isom
selling forth the haNS for a study performed by such lending institution or
limding source to provide whatever ctptal shall he required by the applicant
to construct and operate the proposed system in the County, ur a statement
il
258.1 f6aol6l
_ «r
42.056 BUSINESS. SPECIAL LICENSES
from a eertilicd public accountant, certifying that the applicant has available
sufficient free. net and uncommitted cash resources to construct and operate
the proposed system in this County.
(F) A statement identifying, by place and date, any other
cable television licensels) awarded to the applicant, its parent or subsidiary:
the status of said licenses) with respect to completion thereof: the total cost
of completion of such system(s): and the amount of the applicant's and its
parent's or subsidiary's resources committed to the completion thereof.
(b) A detailed description of the proposed plan of operation of the
applicant which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
( I ) A detailed map indicating all areas proposed to be served, and
a proposed time schedule for the installation of all equipment necessary to
become operational throughout the entire area to be served.
(2) A statement or schedule setting forth all proposed
classifications of rates and charges to be made against subscribers and all
rates and charges as to each of said classifications, including installation
charges and service charges.
(3) A detailed, informative. and referenced statement describing
the actual equipment and operational standards proposed by the applicant.
In no event shall said operational and performance standards be less than
those contained in current Federal Communications Commission regulations.
(4) A copy of the form of any agreement. undertaking, or other
instrument proposed to be entered into between the applicant and any
subscriber.
(5) A detailed statement setting forth in its entirety any and all
agreements and undertaking, whether formal or informal. written, oral, or
implied, existing or proposed to exist between the applicant and any person,
firm, or corporation which materially relate or pertain to or depend upon
the application and the granting of the license.
(c) A copy of any agreement covering the license area, if existing
between the applicant and any public utility subject to regulation by the
California Public Utilities Commission providing for the use of any facilities
of the public utility, including but not limited to poles. lines, or conduits.
(d) Any other details, statements, information or references pertinent
to the subject matter of such application which shall be required or
requested by the Board of Supervisors or by an)' provision of the County
Code or the County Charter.
(c) An applicants fee in the Will of two hwrdred and fury' dollars
(slso) which .hall be in the form of cash, certified or cashier's check, or
money order, to Pay coact of studying, invest ga tin g. and otherwise
proceasing such upplcaunon. and which shall be in contiderntion thereof and
not returnable or ru4untuble in whole or in part, except to the extent that
tuclu fee exceeds the actual costs incurred by the County in studying.
invexnpahng, and otherwise processing the application'. provided. 0131 :m)'
applicant who shall delr.er to the County Clerk a written wltlldraw'al of or
16JP761
CL
C_
rj
A1jos,
t \ \Y \
MS <tnlU \ the
yys1E' n t \K s`C\d ° i
so es
`ONNONtr+ �NSENN�� °n \ \e(euo a pP ;\fat ;cam ddN cosy d °c exP to °t
\ \\cab ,b appb have any ac Boa oft
ON
ANN' aP\ &N s° l \l \CJ tO O \. \e55 ai,on'. the a �P e
\ \at \on \ \OW \nf the \\A I opals t -Such aPP \� toc \0 5 aA PtO��d caun \�e Y
(` cancc ext \° Per,sobd Gtry jeason °aPP \tp °d a..to( wb \tcai,o �•sw\tbm $atd
Board °Ctiund(ed oontY by of 'anz to the �` 8 coca o� 5ot� b \,c b`°aa ys Pn °( to -at oft ° b �%\Ne ve' p the sam ck
` 5 pfeNSOb s \ \a <acommenadtCJed W ohfsts\\'aat t .at\east ten l \Ol
'IS anm(°to be `� e bu., ga SP° N n °t \ez tb
p C, \e
00 \b aoo0 nods su(ance. �, qbe \e(eatac. d z tac \t �f
.. Bpd t\tadn&
dofcc \n
co sha0 tb tOfce an \\ amo° °(
\nde(nn\C'ca go-P Z� \sob a%yn m t °went in CA bO; at to
6 °nd" tit PtyCEfd nt 5 °� sc. OvaN% tY as a ppPee�See s\t ( \ \ot soc e
41 O, la) ��OR �e o8ot o 1`zc \,adv � by dle eno� tits cz�efa \ \Y it a Yt� r IN
dad °P tie 5�(e`tY �, bae, \iwn.d t� to P(OVSOint \Y ��a\ed °c \peol(anYns� et
Ond Wnd tsha \�� one h� \b,:z es ovc \l (�7tonnt otJa pcOPe�yoch bO^Jb
agreemenW\tb s
mP \Y en tb< . anY James \UJmB tu\\ a� enl °tai amppO`� te(tn °enJ a \\
c'cen'e. t and "SeYtbec at. ,nda \tac ab °i,oU P �U� n8t \ede \n (Oh Sa d heeno�Y
<,' a\ u \t c \ud
Co°n`zam8• cost °tdet >\tt't�POB ebb �1 \ \mieo(CPc(`;pted y(eunJo,�i`thc
tY .ed'
n \C,eai,o aY be'o \e le ° tGcell s se ° obo \d' county ` ON \'on ta( of
\ °pst %wa,d�d °het�\''\b�u mtY
INC n °`wJbYbty �tb °bnt th,d\`` \bpoJ °a
c
r Sa \d,se to(o\e oosa�tytb�n \aF"sp�`1oPt \a'� s0, "\ \'''mutmt °\ n\ t, °o
C6e. ot\s 'v,. d
ob \\Ca f the P n °f ta\tb\ v h"m�to t "oNtle n �k, \c t d
Meth of beletoo z`et s< uncle( a° s a \t \ \z( nJ, bz' s'
p" "o\\stt�C �,z \`ee' \��t °f J:aoAFC the bn \nJ \,a` \5 \cyeafs.at�o0
d °` \n bct, °oPc(at\nn, o\ O 1\\e aPP\ \\"t the
Crab, \\tY < \Y \sso` nOVD. zn NO f > C"'0 \tunJ' Wn\S t
" "sc. O`` \~ e bas ,o\n \) \ °u:uon \nJ\i\on shb8adons.
otbe(s UCT1 \ \cen "'`o``tn' ; p; ane ion of ob 6 3°161
tb\ R \V w \,eJ \. \,tjUOhp„e °f i t n, n "nee a \\ 1ts
'A( av`(?P \` \n \a ` to tUz.e sGnz,ne abd \tY t
P t \ts apP\ J h1 t \pure
\ \ce \ \ \
w) .\o\e a \ \J
\K`njeee �ccp0\P t,(c:z,tt :5g'
Y
42.058 BUSINESS, SPECIAL LICENSES1
CC
The Director shall make his recommendation to the Board of
Appeals, which shall determine whether the amount of the bond may be
reduced, The decision of the Board of Appeals is not appealable to the Board
of Supervisors.
(c) HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION. Licensee shall indemnify and
"s hold harmless the County, its officers, boards, commissions, agents, and
employees, against and from any and all claims, demands. causes of action,
actions, suits, proceedings. damages (including but not limited to damages to
County property and damages arising out of copyright infringements, and
damages arising out of any failure by licensee to secure consents from the
owners, authorized distributors or Bcensees of programs to be delivered by
licensee's cable television system), costs of liability (including costs or
liabilities of the County with respect to its employees), of every kind and
nature whatsoever, including but not limited to damages for injury or death
or damage to person or property, and regardless of the merit of any of the
same, and against all liability to others, and against any loss, cost and
expense resulting or arising out of any of the same, including any attorney
fees, accountant fees, expert witness or consultant fees, court costs, per diem
expense, traveling and transportation expense, or other costs or expense
arising_ out of or pertaining to the exercise or the enjoyment of any County
C
CAW license or franchise.
(d1 LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIRED.
(1) Licensees during the existence of their license will maintain
in force, furnish and rile with the County, at their own expense, a general
comprehensive liability insurance policy, in protection of County, its boards.
commissions, officers, agents and employees, in a company authorized to do
business in the State of California, and in a form satisfactory to the County.
- •• --- protecting the County and said persons against liability for loss or damages
for personal injury, death and property damage occasioned by the operations
of the licensee under this license, with minimum liability limits m rive
hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for personal injury or death Of to 1 or
more persons in any one Occurrence. and one hundred thousand dollars
(5100,000) for damage to property resulting from any one occurrence.
(2) The policies mentioned in the foregoing paragraph shall:
(A) Name the County as an insured;
(B) Contain a provision that a written notice of any
cancellation or reduction in coverage of said policy shall be delivered to the
County ten (10) day's m advance of the effective elate thereof:
(C) Be filed with the Clerk of the BOnrd of Supervisors in
the form of a copy of sold policy of insurancee.
r
42, 05S County Department of Transportation Permit.
No dpltar111M, tdcllll7' or improvement Shall be Installed, laid, modified.
Or mdmtamed Linder this License without first having Plans approved and
obtaining a Permit t'rom thv County DeparUnenl of Transportation. The
(6 e,0 )61 2584
Y
COMMUNITY ANTENNA TV SYSTEMS 42.059 — 42.0510
CC
plans (or map) shall show in detail the location of such facilities. The
licensee shall comply with any instruction of the Board of Supervisors or the
County Engineer with respect to the location or relocation of any of said
licensed property.
42.059 Construction Requirements.
(a) STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIAL. That all
licensed property shall be built and constructed in a good and workmanlike
manner and of good material. At all reasonable times, the licensee shall
permit any duly authorized representative of the Board of Supervisors to
examine all property of the licensee, constructed, laid, operated or
maintained pursuant to the license: and to examine all books, accounts,
papers, maps and other records maintained by the licensee concerning the
operations, transactions, property or financial condition of the licensee.
(b) POLE CONSTRUCTION. That all pole construction and
installation shall be in accordance with "Rules for Overhead Electric Line
Construction." California Public Utilities Conrmissirn Geller.! Order No. 95.
That no poles shall be erected in any public highway, street, alley,
. (! road, public right of way. or other public place, in which there exists a pole
line of any public utility, and that pole line is reasonably available for a pole
rental agreement.
(c) INTERFERENCE WITH HIGHWAYS. In installing, locating,
laying or maintaining such facilities, apparatus or improvements, the licensee
shall not interfere with the use of any public street, highway, alley, or bridge
or the traveling public or public purposes to any greater extent than is
., .. necessary and shall leave the surface of ally such street, highway, alley, or
bridge in as good condition as it was prior to performance by the licensee of
such work. Any facility. apparatus or improvement laid, located, installed or
maintained tinder this license shall be laid, installed, located or maintained in
conformity with instructions given by. and to the satisfaction of the Road
Commissioner or other appropriate officer of said County. Insol'ar as they do
not connict with the terms and conditions herein. the provisions of Sections
51.011 through 51.059 of this Code shall apply to regulate construction.
supervision, permils, fees, bonds, safety regulations and other matters
provided in said sections.
42.0510 Right of County to Alter
Street, or Public Places.
/ ( (a) RIGHT TO IMPROVE. The County reserves the right to improve
any highway. street. alley or other public place, or portion theroof, over and
within which this license is granted, including the widening, change of grade.
construction or rvemnvtnichon of such highway, street, alley or other public
place. or any portion thereol. and there is lurlher reserved to the County
and rut) mumcipul corporation. Political sulbdiviston or district within the
258.5 16 JP )61
-- - -- . .... / V "`�
4 2.0510 BUSINESS, SPECIAL LICENSES
CC
County the right to construct, reconstruct, install, repair and maintain in any
such highway, street, alley or other public place, or portion thereof, any
public improvement.
(b) NOTICE TO LICENSEE — PROTECTION OF PROPERTY. If
notice in writing is given to the licensee thirty (30) days in advance of the
fact that work is to be done pursuant to any right reserved above in this
section specifying the general nature of the work and the area in which the
same is to be performed, then the Bcens •e shall do all things necessary to
protect its licensed property during the progress of such work and if ordered
by the Board of SupL visors of the County, the licensee shall temporarily
disconnect or temporarily remove or shall relocate its licensed property
within the highway, street, alley or other public place to such extent, to such
manner and for such periods as shall be necessary to permit the performance
of such work in an economical manner and in accordance with the generally
recognized engineering and construction methods. and to permit the
maintenance, operation and use of such public improvement or of the
highway, street, alley or other public place as so improved. Such notice shall
be at least thirty (30) days in advance of the commencement of work. All of
such things to be done and work to be performed by the licensee shall be at i
the sole cost and expense of the licensee. C
(c) LICENSEE'S DUTY TO COUNTY FOR INCREASED COST
CAUSED. In the event that the County or any municipal corporation,
political subdivision or district within the County shall hereafter construct.
install, reconstruct or repair any bridge or artificial support in or underlying
any highway. street, alley or other public place in which the licensee's
licensed property is located, and in the event that the cost of such work as
may reasonably be required is increased in order to provide for the
installation, maintenance or operation of licensee's properly in or on the
area covered by or underlain by said bridge or other artificial support. then
the licensee shall pay to the County or such municipal corporation, political
subdivision or district doing such work the full amount of such increase of
cost, upon completion of such construction, installation or repair; provided.
however, that the licensve in lieu of the foregoing, relocates its facilities to
avoid Stich increase of cost.
(d) DAMAGE TO Pl1BLIC PROPERTY. Any damage done directly or
indirectly to any public street. highway, alley or other public place or public
nipruvement by the licensee, in exercising directly or indirectly any right.
power or privilege under this license, or in performing any duty under or
pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. shall he promptly, repaired by said
licenwe, at its sole cost and expense, to the complete saustaction of the
County. bi the event such repem is not promptly accomplished or if in the
judgment of the public Works Agency such repair must he accomplished
inuanhutely, the County shall make such repair. Such repair Shall be charged
against the licensee.
16 30, 761 258 -6
9
•
•
C
• COMMUNITY ANTENNA TV SYSTEMS 42 0511 — 42.0513
CC
42.0511 Unnitalionsof License.
(a) Every license panted under this chapter shall be nonexclusive.
(b) No privilege or exemption shall be granted or conferred by any
license granted under this chapter except those specifically prescribed herein.
(c) Any privilege claimed under any such license by the licensee in
i any street or other public property shall be subordinate to any prior lawful
occupancy of the streets or other public property.
(d) Any such license shall be a privilege to he held in personal trust by
the original licensee. It cannot in any event be sold, transferred, leased,
assigned or disposed of, in whole or in part, either by forced or involuntary
sale, or by voluntary sale, merger, consolidation or otherwise. without prior
consent of the County. and then only under such conditions as may herein
be prescribed. The said consent of the Board of Supervisors may not be
unreasonably refused: provided. however. the proposed assignee must show
financial responsibility as determined by the Board of Supervisors and must
agree to comply with all provisions of this chapter.
(e) The licensee shall be subject to all requirements of County laws,
rules, regulations, and specifications heretofore or hereafter enacted or
established.
C( (0 Any such license panted shall not relieve the licensee of any
• ` obligations involved in obtaining pole or conduit space from any department
of the County, utility company. or from others maintaining utilities in
streets.
i'
42.0512 Rights Reserved to the County.
(a) There is hereby reserved to the County the power to amend any
section of this chapter so as to require additional or greater standards, of
" construction, operation, maintenance or otherwise, on the part of the
licensee to reflect technical and economic changes occurring during the term,
and to enable the County and the licensee to lake advantage of new
developments in the cable television industry so as to more effectively.
efficiently and economically serve the public.
(b) Neither the granting of any license nor any provision hereof shall
constitute a waiver or bar to the exercise of any governmental right or power
of the County.
42.0513 Rules and Reeublions.
(a) STANOAROSOFOPFRATION.
11) l'he UnarJ of Supervisor may adopt odes, reculat ions and
standards governing the operation of cable television systems in the County.
Such rules, regulations and standards shall apply to and shall govern the
operations of the hcemce of any license hereunder, and are expressly
declared a part ml any livens- hereunder.
258.7 16•]0)6/
42.0514 — 42.0515 BUSINESS, SPECIAL LICENSES
C'
(b) RATES. Prior to granting any license, the following rates and
charges made by any licensee shall be fixed:
(I) Charges for installation:
(2) Subscriber rates:
(3) Service charges for separate classification of service, e.g.,
additional connections, etc,
Established rates or charges shall not be changed at any time after
the granting of license except after due notice and hearing as provided
herein.
(c) Rates and charges for all services by any existing licensee shall be
according to a schedule which shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the
effective date of the ordinance amending this chapter. Requests for rate
changes by the licensee shall be submitted to the Director on a form
provided by said Director, together with information to support said
requested adjustment in Cates. The Director shall within sixty (60) days
subnut his recommendation along with the request to the Board of Appeals
who shall consider the recommendation of the Director after due notice and
hearing. Said Board of Appeals shall make its recommendation to the Board
of Supervisors. Said recommendation may be appealed by the licensee or any
subscriber in the area affected by said rate adjustment within twenty (20) `
calendar days of the written recommendation of the Board of Appeals. If
said recommendation is not appealed, the Board of Supervisors shall make its
determination on the recommendation of the Board of Appeals.
42.0514 Violations.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to construct. install or maintain
within any public street, road or right of way in the County or within any
other public property of the County, or within any privately owned area
within the County which has not yet become a public street but is
designated or delineated as a proposed public street on any tentative
subdivision map approved by the County, any equipment or facilities for
distributing any television signals or radio Signals through a cable television
system, unless a license authorizing such use of such street, road or right of
way or property or area has first been obtained pursuant to the provisions of
this chapter, and unless such license is in full force and effect.
42.05 1 5 Exchange of Franchise or Licenw.
Any person presently holding a franchise or license from the County to
operate a tcicsision cable service may, within one hundred and eiJrty t 1801
days from the effective dale of the ordinance amending this chapter.
es change said Iranchusc or license for a fifteen (15) year licence issued under
this chapter. I'he holder of such Iranchise or license shall not be required to
pay the two hundred and lifty dollar (5250) license issuance fee.
16 ,0 761 258 -8
•
0
9
•
_.
40
CC
CC
COMMUNITY ANTENNA N SYSTEMS
42.0516
42.0516 Consistency with Section 76.31 of the
Federal Communications Commission Regulations.
Consistent with the requirements of Section 76.31 of the Rules and
Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission. any modification
or amendment thereof by the Federal Communications Commission shall, to
the extent applicable, be considered as a part of any license issued under the
provisions of this chapter as of the effective date of such modification or
amendment and shall be incorporated herein by specific amendment hereto
within one (l) year of the effective date of the amendment of the Federal
Communications Commission or at the time of the renewal of any license
issued hereunder, whichever occurs first.
258.0
16JP 761
Bew
baldly view chapter
buiidinq industry association of southern california, inc.
May 8, 1981
Harry Hogan
City Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Dear Barry:
C
c
k° ,li "rt p,'Oi,vafT0 1. �N
t i
71`��3tiu7ii7�f,7�j3y j1 i6 L
Thank you for seeking our input for Cable Television service in Rancho Cucamonga.
We apologize for any delays resulting from our delinquency forwarding comments
to the City.
In response to the April 8, 1981 staff report by Assistant Planner, Dan Coleman,
we would comment on only two of many questions raised:
Who is responsible for installing a cable system,
and who pays for the system.
...Should the Planning Commission require developers
to install cable as a condition of approval on a
sub - division?
Under no circumstances in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is it necessary or is it
appropriate to require a home builder to bear the cost of installing cable
materials.
This of course would be asking one private business to subsidize another
privately owned and operated business. This is not necessary because there are
in our estimation, many reputable cable TV companies, he are willing to do
business in the City of Rancho Cucamonga without the benefit of such a subsidy.
The national Lcaaun_ of Cities states that the average cable system costs between
$300.00 and $5C0.00 per subscriber; this report is attached.
The cable television industry is an extremely nrufitablc• and extremely competitive
private industry, as would be evidenced upon the City's public notice of a request
for bids for cable franchises in Rancho Cucamonga. Furthermore, under no other
circumstances is one private industry required to subsidize another private
business in the production of housing.
For these reasons, we do not feel it to be appropriate for the City to adopt a
policy which requires one private business to subside the profit of another
private business. The $300.00 to $500.00 cost of installation is the cable
television, companies cost of doing business for which they are reimbursed with
a narain of profit, paid for by cable television subscribers.
is
•
1150 N Nountam Ave Bldg A Ste 207 Rep,esent a v! of San Bema,d:no County
Upland, CA 91786 (714) 981-2997 or 9464869 An Athipate of the NAH9 and the CBIA
Vllg wther c0n9rdcratlon( :Serves further clarifi,ition. Ce April ti, 19gi shit[
report incorrectly states that:
Whatever the installation cost for cable is,
this cost will ultimately be transferred to
. the home buyer in the price of the home.
This is not correct. The cost should not be subsidized by all new home buyers.
It should be paid by cable TV subscribers.
Adoption of a City policy requiring a home builder to subsidize this service
will in effect require all new home buyers to subsidize private business
regardless of whether or not they subscribe to that service. This is
unnecessary because it disregards the ability of cable TV subscriber's to pay
for the services they receive. Furthermore, it is in our opinion, inaoprooriati
Being a private business, a cable television company determines a rate
structure which covers its cost of doing business, The company provides a
service for which subscriber's pay a monthly fee. Those who chose not to
subscribe are not asked to pay the monthly fee. Likewise, every new home buyer
should not he reouired to subsidize the cost of installing a cable TV system.
Especially when one considers that the cable system is privately Owned and
operated for a profit.
If at the present time, the cable television companies serving the City of
Rancho Cucamonga fee'_ that they would be unable to continue operation of
their business without the benefit of an installation subsidy financed by the
City's homeowners, we strongly suegest that the City look to competitive cable
eomoacies for service. Please consider, (1) that the cable TV industry is
•experiencine an "economic boom." This according to the Industry's leading
trade publication "T'VC "- ara'_c'_e is attached: and (2) the amount of proposed
development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga including development in "shaded"
foothill areas makes it an especially lucrative market.
I
Recommendation:
Should the City adopt any policy re: installation of
materials, included should be a clause which insures
that (1) the city, under no circumstances pay=_ for
..._ installation of cable. (2) that the owner -cable
company pays for its own installation of materials
without subsidies. Such a provision may read as follows:
CONSTRUCTION: Grantee shall construct
and maintain system in accordance with
general order no. 95 at the Public
Utilities Commission.
This provision is taken from City of San Bernardino's ordinance granting a Crancise
to a pr vate cable TV company. (3) Any enterprise (the City, homebuilder) who
unwillingly bears any cost of installation /materials shall be reimbursed by said
private cable enterprise.
Thank you for your consideration. As this is a complex issue, I would appreciate
any opportunity to further discuss it with yourself or any other interested party.
Sincerely,
Marvin Shaw
Executive Assistant
cc: Mem'ucrs of Manning Commission
W/o attachment
a
LEWIS HOMES
115E NS Moufftm Aenue /P.O. Box 670 /UVOW.G 91786/A4 985,0971
May 22, 1981
Members of the Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
C
i'"t• DEPT
A11
71a13,i0/11�11/L1S1415 6
Reference: Requiring Cable TV Installation In New Subdivisions
Dear Members of the Planning Commission:
It is our understanding that a staff proposal to require cable television
pre - wiring as a condition of tentative map approval will soon be considered
by the Planning Commission. Lewis Homes wishes to express our opposition
to this proposal as an unnecessary and costly burden to future home
purchasers within the City.
0
At a time when homeownership has become increasingly more difficult, the •
City should not be adding requirements that mandate an increase in the cost
of a home. The cost of this amenity would be passed along to the
homebuyer, of course, but it is passed along at a higher rate that reflects
the cost of construction loan interest and the buyer's mortgage interest.
All of these costs would be borne by the homebuyer without the guarantee
that he will ever receive cable television service.
The requirement for mandatory installation of cable has the effect of
requiring homeowners to subsidize a private, highly competitive, and
potentially lucrative business regardless of whether they chose to
subscribe to that service. It is our opinion that cable television service
should be paid for only by those who wish to pay for it - at the time that
a cable company is ready and able to provide such service.
Finally, the proposal is particularly inappropriate because it is entirely
unnecessary. Rancho Cucamonga is an attractive market for cable companies,
who will be willing to come in and provide the cable service without a
mandatory requirement. Typically, a cable company will install cable
service and charge the subscriber less than the actual initial installation
cost. That cost is recouped by the monthly subscribers fee; again, by the
person who desires cable service.
1
•
Members of the Pla. .ng Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
May 22, 1981
Page 2
It is hoped that you will carefully evaluate the practical effects of a
mandatory cable installation requirement and choose not to burden future
homeowners with this unnecessary cost. We look forward to an opportunity
to discuss this with you in greater detail.
Very truly yours,
Greg M. Salvato
Administrative Assistant
to Ralph M. Lewis
CMS:Jah:2054aa
cc: Mr. Richard Dahl, Chairman
Mr. Jeffrey Ring
Mr. Herman Hempel
Mr. Jeffrey Sceranka
Mr. Peter Tolstoy
Mr. Jack Lam
Mr. Lauren Wasserman
Mr. Barry Hogan
• City Council
42
l�
0
•
7
V ,\
Mff, REPORT
Date: July 1, 1981
To: City Council and City Manager
From: William L. Holley, Director, Community Services Department
Subject: Authorization to Distribute Request for Proposals to Landscape
Architecture Firms for the Design of Heritage Park
Request authorization to take first step in the designing of Heritage Park,
that is, selecting the design firm. Funding is available through the Park
Development Fundfrom the proceeds of the sale of Demens Channel to the
San Bernardino County Flood Control District. (Note: The proceeds from
that sale are restricted to use only in Heritage Park by the terms of the
76 Bond Act which funded a major portion of the acquisition.)
We propose to distribute RFP's to firms of background and proven track
records in park design. Our recommendation to Council for design firm
selection will be based not only on price but on physical inspection of
parks designed by the several firms in final competition for selection,
and discussion with the operating agencies of those parks regarding the
competing firms ability to meet the clients requested features combined
with low maintenance amenities. This may sound like "over -kill" but
Heritage Park will be here for a long time, and as our "first" city
designed park, it is going to be done right. (Alta Loma Park was designed
by a County assigned "structural engineer" whose specialty was dams and
reservoirs. Unfortunately, that specialty shows.)
Once the consultant is selected, a brief synopsis of the design process is
as follows:
• Community meetings with designer, citizens and Director to take
input as to what features the community would like to see included
in Heritage Park.
Preliminary sketches reflecting incorporation of "most feasible"
and "best" features offered at citizen meetings.
• Community meeting with preliminary sketches. "This is what we think
we heard you say you wanted. Have we hit the mark ?"
• Refinement of sketches.
Community meeting.
Refinement.
• Community meeting with a "majority concensus" reached that this is
the "best" possible and "most" feasible design for the park.
1?'
Staff Report
Landscape Architecture Firms - Design of Heritage Park
Page 2
•
• Planning Commission.
• Council.
• Preparation of full working drawings of the park by the consultant.
As outlined above, the first part of this process would seem to indicate
that this will be a popularity contest as to what the park will be. It
is not. A single park can not be all things to all people. Topography,
adjacent land uses, and "character" of the site all provide constraints
and challenges to proper development. It falls to the Community Service
Department to indicate to a group that it is not feasible to build 42
soccer fields or 18 little league diamonds where the effect will create a
travesty upon the land and its surrounding environs.
One question which crosses our minds when we discuss a project of this sort,
is how much will it cost? The answer is not clear. What we can say is
that the design costs are generally a percentage of the total construction
cost. Today we can say that it is roughly $40,000 per acre to develop a
park. We will be developing approximately 33 plus acres (40 acre site minus
Demens Channel) at ultimate construction value of 1.3 million dollars. The
high side of the scale for design is the recommended 8% of the American
Institute of Landscape Architects or $105,000. It is however the common
practice to charge on projects of this scope 5% or 6 %, $66,000 or $79,000
respectively. This is in any respect, a lot of money. Our choices are
very limited, however, pay a professional to do the job or offer it to
Cal Poly, Pomona as a class project. I recommend the former.
Council Options:
1. Authorize the Community Service Director to distribute requests
for proposals on the design of Heritage Park to landscape archi-
tecture firms and return to Council with a recommendation for
selection;
2. Give further Council consideration to having Cal Poly, Pomona
design the park; or
3. Not proceeding at this time with the design.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council exercise Option #1
based on the fo lowing:
1. Politically we need to show park development activities beginning
to give credibility to our program and keep the momentum going;
2. The park must be designed before it can be built and that design •
expense WITl —not get cheaper;
�� U
Staff Report
Landscape Architecture Firms - Design of Heritage Park
Page 3
E
3. I would be very reluctant to entrust the design of Heritage Park
to a firm or group without "real world" experience in the field.
Theory is fine ... but not at Heritage Park.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to
give me a call.
nm
11
W]
139
40
•
El
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 26, 1981
T0: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager /City Council
FROM: Harry J. Empey, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Redevelopment Agency
Please find attached the following: copies of resolution& and a contract, all
of which are to serve as a vehicle for establishing a loan to the Redevelopment
Agency from the City; a budget by which the Redevelopment Agency will operate;
and a contract between the City and the Redevelopment Agency for the repayment of
costs incurred by the Redevelopment Agency back to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
These documents will also serve the purpose of establishing debt, which is a
necessary requirement for the County to give its seal of approval for the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. It is Anticipated that, even though the budget
has established a $70,000 figure, expenses and costs incurred by the Redevelop-
ment Agency may and will probably exceed the $70,000 amount. Here again, this
will serve the purpose of acquiring debt, as is required.
HJE:cam
Attachments
I'i h
RESOLUTION NO. 5r1 -/n
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA CREATING A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
- AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE FUND.
WHEREAS, the City Council, in accordance with the provisions of the
California Community Redevelopment Law, desires to initiate a redevelopment
program in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has designated itself as the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency; and
WHEREAS, said California Community Redevelopment Law provided for
the creation of a Community Redevelopment Agency Administrative Fund for the
purpose of accounting for administrative expenses of the Agency and funds
advanced therefore by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that a Community Redevelopment Agency Administrative Fund is
hereby created for the purpose of accounting for administrative costs of the
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and funds advanced therefore by this
City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1981.
AXES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren ti. Wasserman, City Clerk
El
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
l�l
RESOLUTION NO. IL- _b �
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1981 -1982
AND LOANING FUNDS TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council, in accordance With the provisions of the
California Community Redevelopment Law, has created a Community Redevelopment
Agency Administrative Fund for the purpose of accounting for administrative
expenses of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and funds advanced there-
fore by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to loan funds to the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Reserve Funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
Section It That $70,000 is hereby appropriated from Reserves to
the Community Redevelopment Agency Administrative Fund for admin-
istrative costs as they apply to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelop-
ment Agency in accordance with that Agency's approved budget for
Fiscal Year 1981 -1982.
. Section 2_ That the budget of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency for Fiscal Year 1981 -1982, as attached to this Resolution,
is hereby approved in the following amounts:
E
ACTIVITY
FUND ACTIVITY APPROPRIATION
Community Redevelopment
Agency Administrative Fund Administration $70,000
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this let day of July, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
rf
�i
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
E
FUND
Redevelopment
FUNCTION
Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelo ment Agency
DEPARTMENT OR ACTIVITY
Redevelopment
ACCOUNT
CURRENT
PROPOSED
APPROVED
CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
Salaries 6 Benefits
-0-
20,000
20,000
Services 6 Supplies
-0-
50,000
50,000
Capital Outlay
Departmental Overhead
_
General Overhead
PROGRAM TOTAL
-0-
70,000
70,000
Number of Positions
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FUND
IFUNCTION
Rancho Cucamonga
DEPARTMENT OR ACTIVITY ACCOUNT
Redevelopment
Redevelo meat Agency
POSIT
NS
I g(7pOg
o
CURRENT
PROPOSED
APPROVED
POSITION TITLE
°m
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
z
w
o
v
Agency Board
-0-
5
5
-0-
3,600
Exective Director
-0-
1/8
1/8
-0-
8,775
Other Staff Requirements
-0-
7,625
(Administrative)
TOT. \L
-0-
5 /S
51/
-0-
20,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
is
•
I ,
U
FUND
FUNCTION
DEPARTMENT OR ACTIVITY
ACCOUNT
Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment
Redevelopment Agency
Redevelo ment
CURRENT
PROPOSED
APPROVED
ACCOUNT
CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
20
Legal Advertising
-0-
500
500
28
Professional Services
-0-
49,500
49,500
TOTAL
-0-
50,000
50,000
ACTIVITY INFORMATION
CURRENT
PROPOSED
BUDGET
BUDGET
Contract
Services for Consultant
-0-
49,500
Legal Advertising As Needed
-0-
500
TOTAT
-0-
50,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. `d1 -1o7
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A COOPERATION AGREEMENT
WITH THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
that the Mayor is authorized to execute and enter into, on behalf of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, a cooperation agreement with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevel-
opment Agency, substantially in the form attached to this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this Ist day of July, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
•
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
�r t{�
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
is agreement is entered into, as of the 1st day of July, 1981, by and between the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (herein, the City) and the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, a public body (herein, the Agency).
Recitals
A. The City Council of the City, acting pursuant to the provisions of the California
Community Redevelopment Law, has activated the Agency and has declared itself to
constitute the Agency, by Ordinance No. 145, dated the 20th day of May, 1981.
B. Pursuant to said California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency is performing
a public function of the City, and may have access to services and facilities of
the City.
C. The City Council of the City has created a Community Redevelopment Agency Adminis-
trative Fund for the purpose of accounting for administrative costs of the Agency,
has approved a budget for the Agency for the Fiscal Year 1981 -1982, and has loaned
funds to the Agency for its administrative expenses.
D. The City and Agency desire to enter into this agreement to set forth services and
facilities which the City will render for and make available to the Agency in
furtherance of the activities and functions of the Agency under the California
Community Redevelopment Law.
• Agreements
4
1. The City agrees to provide for the Agency such staff assistance, supplies, tech-
nical services and other services and facilities of the City as the Agency may
require in carrying out its functions under the California Community Redevelopment
Law. Such assistance and services may include the services of the City officers
and employees, and special consultant services, including, but not limited to,
special redevelopment council.
2. The City shall periodically, but not less than annually, submit to the Agency a
statement of the costs incurred by the City in rendering services and facilities
of the City to the agency pursuant to this agreement. Said statement may include
a proration of City's administrative and salary expense attributable to services
of City officials, employees and departments rendered for the Agency.
3. The Agency agrees to accept services and facilities of the City pursuant to this
agreement and to repay to the City, at such time as funds are available to the
Agency for such repayment, the costs of the City under this agreement as shown
on statements submitted to the Agency pursuant to paragraph two (2) hereof.
4. The obligations of the Agency under this agreement shall constitute an indebtness
Of the Agency within the meaning of Article 6, Chapter 6, of the California
Community Redevelopment Law.
l' /,7
Cooperation Agreement
July 1, 1951
Page 2
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date first
written above.
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BY: Lei.: f` ^JiYC2 -
Chaf man
NO
•
•
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
June 5, 1981
1977
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasseya
City Manager
SUBJECT: Redevelopment B
We are sending you advance copies of the proposed by -laws for our Redevelopment
Agency. They will be scheduled for review on the Council agenda.
Please give us a call if you have any problems or questions with the proposal.
It is significant to point out that the By -laws are fairly simple, and they
follow the state law requirements precisely. One issue which should be brought
to your attention is the state law provision that the councilmembers serving
in the capacity of a redevelopment agency board receive compensation for each
meeting of the redevelopment agency. It is probable, however, that compensation
will not be forwarded to you until we receive our first tax increment.
Again, the payment is a provision of the state law and is similar in principal
to the state law provisions which relate to council members salary. Aside from
that single issue, there really is nothing which should generate any type of
controversy.
Please review the proposed By -laws and let us know if you have any questions
or comments. They will appear as a consent item on the agenda unless the Council
wishes to discuss them in some detail.
LMW:baa
• RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING BY -LAWS FOR SAID AGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
by Ordinance declared the need for a redevelopment agency to function in said
City; and
WHEREAS, said ordinance has taken effect and all other require-
ments of law have been met so that the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency is now authorized to function in said City and is permitted to transact
any business and to exercise any powers conferred thereon by the provision of
the Community Redevelopment Law (Part I. commencing with Section 33000 of
Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California); and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the Agency
to make, amend, and repeal by -laws and regulations to carry into effect the
powers and purposes of said Law (provided said by -laws and regulations are
not inconsistent therewith).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency does
hereby find, determine, order, and resolve as follows:
• Section 1. The by -laws attached hereto as Exhibit "A" will help
to carry into effect the powers and purposes of the aforesaid Community Redevelop-
ment Law and are not inconsistent therewith.
7
Section 2. The by -laws attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", and by
this reference made a part hereof as though set forth in full, hereby are
adopted as the By -Laws for the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, Secretary
to the Agency
h
O1
Phillip D. Schlosser, Chairman
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
Resolution No. RA81 -1
Page 2
•
I
EXHIBIT "A"
BY -LAWS
FOR THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I
SECTION 1. THE AGENCY
Page No.
Section
I.I.
Name of the Agency
I
Section
1.2.
Agency Members
I
Section
1.3.
Agency Seal
I
Section
1.4.
Business Offices of Agency
I
ARTICLE II
Money,
Notes, or Other Indebtedness 3
SECTION 2. OFFICERS OF THE AGENCY
Section
2.1.
Designation of Officers
I
Section
2.2.
Terms of Officers
1
Section
2.3.
Duties of Officers
2
Section
2.4.
Compensation of Officers
2
Section
2.5.
Compensation and Expenses of Members
2
ARTICLE III
SECTION 3. EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, AND CONSULTANTS
Section 3.1. Appointment of Employees, Agents, and Consultants 2
Section 3.2. Use of City Employees for Agency Work 3
Section 3.3. Compensation of Employees, Agents, and Consultants 3
ARTICLE IV
SECTION 4. GENERAL
Section
4.1. Authority
to Bind
Agency 3
Section
4.2. Contracts,
Deeds,
and Other Documents 3
Section
4.3. Payment of
Money,
Notes, or Other Indebtedness 3
1
Page No.
. ARTICLE V
SECTION 5. MEETINGS
Section
5.1.
Regular Meetings 3
Section
5.2.
Special Meetings 3
Section
5.3.
Executive Sessions 3
Section
5.4.
Public Hearings 4
Section
5.5.
Adjourning and Continuing Meetings and 4
Public Hearings to Other Times and Places
4
Section
5.6.
Quorum
Section
5.7.
Order of Business 4
•
13
ARTICLE VI.
SECTION 6. AMENDMENT OF THE BY -LAWS 5
ARTICLE I
SECTION 1. THE AGENCY.
Section I.I. Name of the Agency. The name of the Agency shall be
thesRancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ", hereinafter referred to as the "Agency."
Section 1.2. Agency Members. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga has by ordinance declared the need for a redevelopment agency to function
in said City and declared itself to be the Agency. The Members of the Agency shall
be the Members of the City Council, as that body is constituted, and they shall
remain Agency Members only so long as said Members remain on the Council; and new
members of the City Council shall automatically become Members of the Agency.
Section 1.3. Agency Seal. The seal of the Agency shall contain at
least the name of the Agency and the year of its organization.
Section 1.4. Business Offices of the Agency. The business offices of
the Agency shall be in such location in the City as may be selected from time to
time by resolution or motion of the Agency Members. The principal business office
of the Agency shall be in the City Hall unless and until Cbenged by resolution or
motion of the Agency Members.
ARTICLE II
SECTION 2. OFFICERS OF THE AGENCY.
Section 2.1. Designation of Officers. The officers of the Agency shall
be the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, the Secretary, the Treasurer, the Executive
Director, and the General Counsel.
The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tam of the City shall serve as the Chairman
and Vice Chairman, respectively, of the Agency.
The City Clerk shall serve as the Secretary of the Agency; the City
Treasurer shall serve "As, the Treasurer of the Agency; and, the City Manager shall
act as the Executive Dire tor. Any office not provided for immediately above shall
be filled by appropriate action on the part of the Agency Members.
0
Section 2.2. Terms of Officers. The Agency officers shall remain in
office o y ong as they hold the appropriate City offices; provided,,however,
that the Members m be;majority vote retain the services of either the Executive ,��\
Director or the Secr y whether or not such officers continue to hold the appro-
prints City offices.
•
Section 2.3. Duties of Officers. The Chairman shall preside at the
,.4 Agency meetings and perform such other duties as are incident to the office of
Chairman.
The Vice Chairman shall perform the duties of the Chairman in the
absence or incapacity of the Chairman. The Vice Chairman shall also perform all
other duties incident to the office of the Vice Chairman.
The Secretary shall keep and maintain the records of the Agency and
the minutes of the Agency meetings. The Secretary shall also keep in safe custody
the seal of the Agency. The Secretary shall be authorized to affix the seal to all
documents and instruments to be executed for the Agency by vote of the Members.
The Secretary shall also perform ;.11 other duties incident to the office of Secre-
tary of the Agency.
The Treasurer shall supervise the fiscal affairs of the Agency and
shall also supervise the care and custody of a, ll monies of the Agency. The
Treasurer shall cause adequate, mZra�' accounts of the properties, monies,
and transactions of the Agency to b e t a intained. The Treasurer shall render
Co the Members of the Agency, Treasurer's report of the Agency's
transactions and financial condition. The Treasurer shall submit to the Members of
the Agency significant information and recommendations concerning the fiscal affairs
of the Agency. The Treasurer shall also perform all other duties incidental to the
office of Treasurer.
The Executive Director is charged with the administration, management
• and general supervision of the business and affairs of the Agency.
The General Counsel shall be in overall charge of the legal affairs of
the Agency.
Section 2.4. Compensation of Officers. Agency Members may fix and
determine the compensation and allowable expenses for the discharge of Agency duties
of Officers, other than Agency Members, by resolution or motion.
Section 2.5. Compensation and Expenses of Members. Members of the
Agency shall receive Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per meeting attended, provided that
no member shall receive compensation for attending more than four (4) meetings of
the Agency during any calendar month.
Members may be reimbursed for their actual and necessary expenses,
including travel expenses, incurred in the discharge of their duties. Such expenses
shall be reimbursed upon proper claim submitted to and approved by the Agency.
ARTICLE III
SECTION 3. PTLOYEES AGENTS, AND CONSULTANTS.
Section 3.1. Appointment of Employees, Agents, and Consultants. The
Members may from time to time select and appoint such agents and consultants,
permanent and temporary, as it may require to properly administer the business of
the Agency.
-2-
7
S.ction _3_' Use of Cite Ennlove_es for _ACenv�_Work. 'ro minimize the
opurntinz tests of the Agency, it is hereby stated to be the policy of the
Apcncv to utilize tl,e services of City emnloeccs in carrying out Agen:v
funct i. nns. CiLv personnel recuired to devote such services in excess of
normal hours and working conditions of Citv ennlovment, shall be deemed Agent'
employees for such periods and may be vomnensated from Agency funds.
Section 3.3. Compensation of Employees Agents, and Consultants.
The Agency Members may determine and fix the compensation and allowable expenses
for the discharge of Agency duties of employees, agents, and consultants by motion
or resolution.
ARTICLE IV
SECTION 4. GENERAL,
Section 4.1. Authority to Bind Agency. No Member, officer, agent,
or employee of the Agency, without prior authority by a vote of the Agency members,
shall have any power or authority to bind the Agency by any contract, to pledge its
credits, or to render it liable for any purpose in any amount.
Section 4.2. Contracts Deeds. and Other Documents. The Chairman, or
Vice Chairman in the absence of the Chairman, shall execute on behalf of the Agency
all contracts, deeds and other documents and instruments as authorized by the Agency
Members, Nothing herein contained shall prohibit or be construed to prohibit the
Agency Members from authorizing any other officer or employee of the Agency to so
execute such instruments or documents.
Section 463. Payment of Money Notes or Other Indebtedness. All checks,
drafts or other orders for the payment of money, notes or other evidence of indebted-
ness issued in the name of or payable to the Agency shall be signed or endorsed by
the Chairman, or in his absence the Vice Chairman, and the Executive Director or
Treasurer.
ARTICLE V
SECTION 5. MEETINGS.
Section 5.1. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings may be scheduled without
notice on the first and third Wednesdays of each month in the Council Chambers of
the City, or any other place established by Members of the Agency, at 7:00 p.m. or
as soon thereafter as the regular meeting of the City Council shall have been adjourned;
provided, however, that if the same shall be a legal holiday, the regular meeting
shall be held on the next succeeding business day at the same hour and location.
Section 5.2. Special Meetings. A special meeting may be called at
any time pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act
(Government Code Sections 54950 et seq.).
Section 5.3. Executive Sessions. All meetings of a majority or more
Agency Members to take action or to deliberate concerning Agency business and its
conduct shall be open and public to the extent required by law. All persons shall
be permitted to attend any such meetings except as other wise permitted by law.
6
-3-
. Nothing contained in these By -Laws shall be construed to prevent
the Agency Members from holding executive sessions during a regular or special
meeting concerning any matter permitted by law to be considered in an executive
session.
Section 5.4. Public Hearings. All public hearings held by the
Agency Members shall be held during regular or special meetings of the Agency.
Section 5.5. Adiourning and Continuing Meetings and Public Hearings
to Other Times or Places. The Agency Members may continue or adjourn any meeting
to a time and place specified in the order of adjournment. If all Members are
absent from any regular meeting or adjourned regular meeting, the Secretary or Acting
Secretary of the Agency may declare the meeting continued or adjourned to a stated
time and place and shall cause a written notice of the continuance or adjournment
to be given in the same manner as provided for special meetings. A copy of the
order or notice of continuance or adjournment shall be conspicuously posted on or
near the door of the place where the meeting was held within twenty -four (24) hours
after the time of the continuance or adjournement. When a regular, continued, or
adjourned regular meeting is continued or adjourned as provided in this Section, the
resulting continued or adjourned regular meeting is a regular meeting for all
purposes. Wh.n an order of continuance or adjournement of any meeting fails to
state the hour at which the continued or adjourned meeting is to be held, it shall
be held at the hour specified for regular meetings.
Any public hearing being held, or any public hearing noticed or ordered
to be held at any meeting may be order or notice of continuance or adjournment be
• continued, recontinued, adjourned, readjourned to any subsequent meeting in the
same manner and to the same extent set forth for the continuance or adjournment of
meetings.
If any meeting or hearing is continued or adjourned to a time less than
twenty -four (24) hours after the time specified in these By -Laws or in the order or
notice of meeting or hearing, a copy of the order or notice of continuance or adjourn-
ment shall be posted immediately following the meeting at which the order or declara-
tion of continuance or adjournment was adopted or made.
Section 5.6. Quorum. A majority of the Members of the Agency shall
constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting its business, exercising its
powers, and for all other purposes.
Section 5.7. Order of Business. The following shall be the general
order of business at Agency meetings.
(1) Roll Call
(2) Approval of Minutes
(3) Treasurer's Report
(4) Public Hearings
(5) Staff Reports
(6) New Business
(7) Adjournment
At any meeting, the Agency Members, by a vote of a majority of the
Agency Members, may change the order of business.
_4-
F
ARTICLE VI
SECTION 6. Ngy*M OF THE BY -LAWS. '
No amendment to the By -Laws shall be adopted unless at least seven
(7) days' written notice of the general nature thereof has been sent previously
to all Members of the Agency.
-5-
1�
•
•
RESOLUTION 110. qP S1! -4
. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR 1981 -1982, ACCPETING A LOAN FROM THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE COl1MDMITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ADMINISTRATIVE FUND, AND AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES THEREFROM.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, as
follows:
Section 1: That the budget attached to this Resolution is hereby
approved and adopted as the 1981 -1982 budget of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevel-
opment Agency.
Section 2: That the loan from the City of Rancho Cucamonga of
$70,000, appropriated to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Admin-
istrative Fund for administrative expenses of the Agency, as set forth in
said budget, is hereby accepted by the Agency and the Agency acknowledges
that said loan constitutes an indebtedness of the Agency within the meaning
of Article 6, Chapter 6, of the California Community Redevelopment Law.
Section 3: The expenditure of monies from the Community Redevelop-
ment Agency Administrative Fund for administrative expenses of the Agency as
set forth in said budget is hereby authorized, subject to expenditures in
substantially the same manner as money drawn by other agencies and departments
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, subject to budgetary control.
• PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1981.
AYES:
ATTEST:
1 11
NOES:
ABSENT:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BY:
Chairman
•
•
I
Y
FUND FUNCTION
DEPARTMENT OR ACTIVITY
ACCOUNT
Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Redevelo ment A enc
Redevela men
CURRENT
PROPOSED
APPROVED
CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
Salaries S Benefits
-0-
20,000
20,000
Services 6 Supplies
-0-
50,000
50,000
Capital Outlay
Departmental Overhead
General Overhead
.PROGRAM TOTAL
-0-
70,000
70,000
Number of Positions
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,r
FUND
FUNCTION
DEPARTMENT OR ACTIVITY
ACCOUNT
Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment
Redevelopment enc
POSITIONS
BUDGET
POSITION TITLE
o
CURRENT
PROPOSED
APPROVED
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDCET
z
,i
ai
b
ftey�
O
Agency Board
-0-
5
5
-0-
3,600
Exective Director
-0-
1/8
1/8
-0-
8,775
Other Staff Requirements
-0-
7,625
(Administrative)
TOT, %L
-0-
1/
5'/
-O-
20,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
is
PUND
20
28
•
DEPARTMENT OR ACTIVITY ACCOUNT
E 'UNCTION
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelo ment App ROVED
Redevelopment A enc C� pQOmOSED gp0_�ET
rr
500 500
-0-
Legal Advertising 49,500 49,500
Professional Services
ACTIV�ORNATION
Contract Services for Consultant
Legal Advertising As Needed
CITY OF RA4CuON/CU=MO,,,CA
l
SENT PROPOSED
BUDGET BUDGET
-0_ 49,500
-O_ 500
-0-
50,000