Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/07/14 - Agenda Packeta g Z U D 1977 (I 1 OF RANCHO CLUAINI(XIK',A CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga Regular Meeting, Tuesday, July 14, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead- line for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call: Frost Mikels_ Palombo_, Bridge L, and Schlosser r • C. Approval of Minutes: June 17, 1981 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. A. Thursday, July 23, 1981 - 6:30 p.m. - Advisory Commission Meeting, Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. B. Wednesday, July 22, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. - Planning Commission Meeting, Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time with- out discussion. a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 81 -7 -15 for $306,800.27 1 b. Alcoholic Beverage License for Charles L. and Margaret A. 3 Leyerly, 10277 Foothill Blvd (Center 8 Foothill) for off -sale general license. c. Forward Claim by Mike Munoz to the City Attorney for 4 handling. d. Amendment to Resolution No. 81 -97 /Salary Resolution. 6a Staff would recommend deletion of Section I. Philosophy of Inlanencatlnn from Resolution 81 -79 (salary resolution) City Council Agenda -2- • adopted at the City Council budget meeting of June 22, 1981. The same philosophy of compensation is contained in the city's Personnel Rules and Regulations, and therefore, it is not necessary to be a part of the Salary Resolution for FY 1981 -82. July 14, 1981 e. Acceptance of Map, Security, and Agreement for Parcel Map 7 6228 - Lamb: located on the north side of La Vine Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -108 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6228, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6228), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY. f. Acceptance of Map, Bonds, and Agreement for Parcel Map 15 6725 - Daon /Barton: located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -109 18 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6725, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6725), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY. g, Acceptance of Improvement Extension Agreement - Tract 9539 19 located on the west side of Sapphire between Banyan and Hillside. Developer: Brubaker, Davis, Person. RESOLUTION NO, 81 -110 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9539. h. Authorization to Seek Bids for the Carnelian Street 23 Realignment. i. Release of bonds for tract 9590: located on the east 24 side of Archibald, north of Hillside. Owner: Terrax Corp. Faithful Performance Bond (landscaping) 429,400 I City Council Agenda -3- July 14, 1981 is 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MEET - AND - CONFER PROCEDURES/ MOBILE HOME PARKS. Report by Jim Robinson. ORDINANCE NO. 148 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.10 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A MOBILEHOME PARK RENT MEDIATION PROCESS. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATE FILING FEES AND APPEAL FEES AFFECT- ING THE CITY'S MOBILEHOME PARK RENT MEDIATION PROCESS AS OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 8.10 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -13: DIVER IFIED INVESTMENT. A change of zone rom -3 mu ttp e family residential to R-3-P.D. (multiple family /planned development) for 11.5 acres of land located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Road for the development of 240 condominiums - APN 202 - 181 -12 and 21 (portion). ORDINANCE NO. 151 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 181 -12, 21 (PORTION) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH- EAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE, FROM R -3 (MULTI- FAMILY) TO R- 3 -P.D. (MULTI- FAMILY/ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT). 25 30 I� 31 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -12: 32 TT 11663: Marlborough Deve opment Corporation: A request for change of zone from R -2 (two family residential) to R- 2 -P.D. (two family residential - planned development) for a total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church west side of Ramona - APN 1077- 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03. 0 City Council Agenda -4- July 14, 1981 ORDINANCE NO. 153 (first reading) 59 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 1077 - 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, AND 1077- 631 -03 GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD, SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH, AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF RAMONA CONSISTING OF APPROXI- MATELY 40 ACRES, FROM R -2 TO R- 2 -P.D. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. A REQUEST BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TO BUILD A DOUBLE- 60 CIRCUIT 220 KV TRANSMISSION LINE IN THE EXISTING RIGHT -OF- WAY BETWEEN ETIWANDA GENERATING STATION AND P DUA SUB- STATION. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. B. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY 62 COMMITTEE FOR THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. • 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7. ADJOURNMENT. The meeting will adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting on August 5, 1981. A REDEVELOPMENT MEETING WILL FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER ADJOURNMENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. 9 1. .L w The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Read, on Tuesday, July 14, 1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the pledge of allegiance. Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Deputy City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Pmpey; Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes of June 17, 1981. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the minutes of June 17, 1981. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 2._ ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Mayor Schlosser announced that the meeting would be ad]ourning to a legal session regarding pending litigation. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 81 -7 -15 for $306,800.27. b. Alcoholic Beverage License for Charles L. and Margaret A. Leyerly, 10277 Foothill Blvd. (Center 6 Foothill) for off -sale general license. c. Forward Claim by Mike Munoz to the City Attorney for handling. d. Amendment to Resolution No. 81 -97 /Salary Resolution. Staff would recommend deletion of Section I. Philosophy of Compensation from Resolution 81 -79 adopted at the City Council budget meeting of June 22, 1981. The same philosophy of compensation is contained in the city's Personnel Rules and Regulations, and therefore, it is not necessary to be a part of the Salary Resolution for FY 1981 -81. e. Acceptance of Map, Security, and Agreement for Parcel Map 6228 - Lamb: located on the north side of La Vine Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6228, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6228), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6725, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6725), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. g. Acceptance of Improvement Extension Agreement - Tract 9539 located on the west side of Sapphire between Banyan and Hillside. Developer: Brubaker, Davis, Person. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE - MENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9539. h. Authorization to Seek Bids for the Carnelian Street Realignment. 1. Release of bonds for tract 9590: located on the east side of Archibald, north of Hillside. Owner: Terrax Corp. Faithful Performance Bond (landscaping) $29,400 Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4A. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MEET- AND - CONFER PROCEDURES /MOBILE HOME PARKS. Staff report by Jim Robinson. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 148. ORDINANCE NO. 148 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.10 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A MOBILE HOME PARK RENT MEDIATION PROCESS. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Stephen White, attorney representing the park tenants. Mr. White had a list of comments and questions by the tenants which he presented. 1. Section 8.10.030, item J. He asked what the extent or limit was of that inquiry? Would this include the owners records and documents to see if the increase was really justified? Council concurred with a suggestion by Councilman Mikels that the owner provide the petitioners with information identified in "A" through "F ". Such changes were made in the Ordinance by the City Attorney. �y that if there were a language change, then this would require a new reading of the ordinance. Mr. Dougherty drafted the following language change: "The proposed rent increase when added to all rent increases which were effective during the 12 months immediately proceeding the effective date of the proposed rent increase computes to be a sum greater than seventy -five (75X) of the percentage by which the Los Angeles -Long Beach- Anaheim Area Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, as reported by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, has increased in the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the date of the most recently published CPI information." 3. Section 8.10.060. He asked if it had been discussed to have a moderator present? He felt that it might be advisable to have a facilitator present. The City Attorney explained that it was not the intent to require this at this stage, but that this does not preclude a moderator being present. The City Attorney said that some parks are owned by a corporation, and obviously they would appoint someone to represent the corporation. There was nothing to preclude the tenants committee from having an advisor present. He said the spirit of this was for an owner and tenant to meet person to person. Councilman Frost suggested that section 8.10.020 could be changed to reflect "a committee representing the tenants." The City Attorney concurred with the suggestion by Councilman Frost that section 8.10.020 should read "a co®ittee, representing the tenants." 4. Section 8.10.110, section A. Mr. White asked if this petition would be dismissed with prejudice? The City Attorney stated that if a meeting is not attended without a cause, then the petition would be dismissed. The intent was to be with prejudice. Also addressing Council were: Jack Emerson, resident of Chapparrel Heights. He had questions regarding the number of increases an owner could impose. Councilman Mikels explained there could be several as long as they did not exceed 75% of the CPI. Harry Pate, Alta Laguna resident. There being no further comments, Mayor. Schlosser closed the public hearing. The City Attorney reviewed the changes which the Council had made. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 148 again for first reading to include the changes, Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser set August 5 for second reading to include the Resolution and Agreement at the August 5 meeting. Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 8:20 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:35 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present. act am. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 151. ORDINANCE NO. 151 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 181 -12, 21 (PORTION) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE, FROM R -3 (MULTI - FAMILY) TO R- 3 -P.D. (MULTI - FAMILY /PLANNED DEVELOPMENT). Motian: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 151. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Jack Tarr, representing Diversified, requested Council to concur with the staff recommendations and approve the rezoning. There being no further public response, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve the rezoning request and Ordinance No. 151. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. �Duauuun uevzburnena uunruaarrun. A request for change or zone trom a-2 (two family residential) to R- 2 -P.D. (two Easily residential /planned development) for a total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church vest side of Ramona - AFN 1077- 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03. Jack Lam presented the staff report. Mr. Paul Byrnes, representing Marlborough, was present and answered questions by Council. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 153. ORDINANCE NO. 153 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 1077 - 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, AND 1077 -631- 03 GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH, AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF RAMONA CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES, FROM R -2 TO R- 2 -P.D. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 153. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Max Hackett who lived on the corner of Ramona and Stafford. He said he had he had attended the Planning Commission meetings when they addressed the same issues of density and traffic flow. He also stated that neither he nor man;: of his neighbors had received a notice of tonight's meeting. As far as they were concerned, the issue had not been resolved by the Planning Commission to their satisfaction. John Klempner said they would be willing to give up the park which the developer was providing land for just to see that this development of 10 to an acre woul? not be built. Paul Byrnes said this area was designated medium density 5 -15 per acre. As far as the traffic issue, he felt the Planning Commission had adequately discussed this. Mr. Hackett said they had asked if this would not require a traffic signal, but they had never received an answer. Peggy Dablia said she was very concerned about the traffic Betty Core expressed concern over the traffic and density. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Mayor Schlosser recommended that the residents talk with the developer before the second reading. Councilman Mikels suggested that enough time be set before the second reading so that adequate input could be received from all the neighbors and friends. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to set second reading for August 19. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. Mr. Wasserman requested that this item be set for August 5 meeting since it would be appropriate for a representative from Edison Company to be present to give this report. Council concurred. 5B. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE ETIWA.NDA SPECIFIC PLAN. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. The following persons had shown an interest in serving on the Advisory Committee: Mr. Ray Trujillo Mr. Neil Westlotorn Mr. James Thompson Mr. Jim Banks Mr. John P. Vlasic Mr. Ron Tannenbaum Mr. Gary Frye Mr. Joe DSIorio Mr. Jay Vickers Mr. John Scherb Mrs. Betty Mc Nay Mr. Ralph Lewis Mr. Andrew Barmakian Mrs. Agatha Kleinman Mr. David P. Flocker Mr, David Swaithes Mr. John P. Blasic representative Mr. Jay Vickers James Frost, the Council representative and Chairman of the Committee Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to accept these names and to direct staff to notify them by letter over the mayor's signature. Motion carried unanimously. Councilman Frost suggested that a letter be sent to those who did not make the Committee thanking them for showing an interest. 5C. ADDED ITEM: RECOMMENDATION OF REDEVELOPMEIT SURVEY AREA. (Item had appeared on the Redevelopment Agency Agenda, but it was necessary that the Council make the survey area designation.) Manny DiDios, Consultant, presented the report and answered Council's questions. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the survey area as designated, approve Resolution No. 81 -112, and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -112. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING A REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA FOR STUDY PURPOSES. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. Mr. Dougherty said there was a need to adjourn to a legal session following the meeting. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Frost to adjourn to a legal session not to reconvene this evening following the Redevelopment Agency business. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 1:25 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting on August 5, 1981. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk lfq � ' MAARA A A V N 0 0 R NAMf 81266 6S 0 KAISER A F�UNIIATI INC HEFLT • 01268 4bSO GIC<JALt !!r)'CJE ALT SAYING i OL7e9 1500 BLUE CROSS 01270 7985 PUnLIF ENP RE.TIME34NT S J 01271 AL16 FCNTANA RAVING INC ' 012 T2 4650 GLEM On IE FEDERAL SAYING 01273 2278 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OT140 8935 TRIAD PIIOIO J 07150 9050 UrBAM CESIG -I AA 01236 07268 01270 J 07271 07271 072]3 07274 07275 07276 01277 07278 07279 i OT2 01231 91 f mini 8104 V'rID VO 10 VOID YUIO VOID 0233 0328 O4B. 3330 1575 1930 2200 2315 2335 2453 19 07284 2525 C"OK CCMPANY I�0 01285 2551 CULVFR- N0ILfa (NC O T 286 2610 WILLIAMS PRINTIIIG. 0 • ' 07297 2641 DSHL, WALPEI4 012 b8 3300 F4PFY, HARRY J 07299 446] ACOSTA. RUBIN 01290 4462 AKERS LYNN 01291 2 4466 DIWITdY !l 1 NET TE 01194468 DYKE Ab(]INE 07293 4470 HERR NOF2 MYPA -- 07294 4472 JCHNSON, LVNTHIA 01295 4474 MARTIMEAU, JILL 07296 4476 MORRISON, Jay _ OT297 - 4479 0CES. PRISCILLA 0729R 4419 R10EGUT. SHIRLEY 07299 4400 AUDI PAM C7310 4482 SHEPARD. LECZA • 01301 4483 IP.CUTYAN YULANOA OT302 4485 VILLAPAN 0 BEVERLY J1I'1 07303 4497 YA7ELL. SATIORA MN 01304 4489 M 07302 4492 07306 4493 _ • 01307 4444 FiSFLIN. _ LINDA 073U9 4400 Gr NEMAL TELEPHONE CO 01309 47n0 CORDONS INC 1 07310 4775 ORANI. JERRY R • 0 T3l{ 4800 Nd AK ER f.']WP CO 01312 49b5 HOGAN. BARRY K .1313 4900 HOLLEY WILLIAM L 01314 4915 HCLLIOAY ROCK CO INC so 07315 5110 IBM 07316 661A KRUSE. JOAN r 07317 - 6510 LAM JACK - 07 B 6655 LAMER RUS PROOUCTS • 07319 6610 LAX SON PRV'OVCTS INC 07311 - 1104 MALM5iOPHYR CHEV, MARK 01322 7188 MARSH C MC LINNAN INC a' 07373 7324 MISSION �UPPLY CO OT325 76dD PACIFICN SCIENTIFIC -- 07376 7730 PAINT BUCKET INC • 07321 7133 PARKER 6 SON PU9LISHERi 07376 7716 PAS GRAPHICS INC ` 01329 ?770 PATICH SALES CORP 07330 7791 POM A OISTEU IN6 CO - -'_ 1 r F NARK :Jp . CAFE i 1 l t' 1 OISCOUNT NET 3. M1e4.L9 2.453. 40 1.597.00 4,O49. 73 9.104.30 6.651.65 45.00 12.sn )5.30 5A.50- 6b4.38- 5T.77 2.100.33 IT.UU $57. 72 307.51 24..n 1,261.90 51.52 14.50 186,099.00 L 4B.13 101.91 112.70 1,114.4A 1, 1, 10, T /l5 /9l DISCOUNT • • RN NET 174.01 8.10 823.'5 1i :o0' 200.00 55.05 It.000.00 61.94 57.180 :42 1].4P 951.10 35.57 17055.11 24.61 1.7.90 114.70 179.00 44.14 80.61 8.466.65- 306.800.27 PAVC 2 1 IU I I I I I 6 0 R J 6 al R867 CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WARRANT RECONCILIATION • MARR F YEN R Y E N 0 C R N A M E OATS REF FR[NCE 07331 7420 PRIDE COLOR VRtSS 7 /IS /Pl • 07332 7825 PROGRESS BULLEIIN 07333 7 /15 /9l 8075 RA PIC DAtA INC 07334 8163 RIZZO. ROBERT 1/15/81 7115/81 07336 8200 NOBINSONERJI`AIFS�IH Itiv Al • 1 07337 8719 SLN STAN EPDINO COUNTY 7/15/01 - 01318 9337 SEDMIY /COOKF 7115/91 07139 8361 SAN DIEGO ROTARY 92OOM 7 /ID/8l 01340 8390 SOUTHERN CALIF ED ISON 7 /15 /F.I • 013A1 8395 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CC 7115/91 •Y 07342 8396 50 CA LANDSCAPE MST 01343 8492 7/15/GI -011 SPILL CGNINOL $PLY C ME 07344 VOID VFNOGk Na. 8525 7 /15 /UI 7/15/81 • . 07345 6525 STATIONERS CORP 7/1S/81 07346 8530 STOCKNELL C FINNEY 1/15/81 07347 8545 SURVFYCRS SVC CO 7 /IS /R1 • 07348 8605 T V SHOP. IHE 07349 1 /15/01 810R TIDWELL. EDGE NE 07350 9390 v STERN 14 MN AY PRODUCT 7115101 7/15101 ' 07351 9999 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 7 /l5 /el 07352 VO10 FINAL TOTALS 7116/91 • 1265A 4118 FONTANA PAVING INC 6/25/81 FINAL TOTALS T /l5 /9l DISCOUNT • • RN NET 174.01 8.10 823.'5 1i :o0' 200.00 55.05 It.000.00 61.94 57.180 :42 1].4P 951.10 35.57 17055.11 24.61 1.7.90 114.70 179.00 44.14 80.61 8.466.65- 306.800.27 PAVC 2 1 IU I I I I I 6 0 R J 6 OF AAtI,Fp CO��hlun °^ ], TYPEI51 OF TRANSACTION(S) 10277 Foothill BlW, — Gry and 2q CVde Cv<nry OO / �/O pECEIPi NO d� d TOTAL P.aC't0 coca bn'391i3C =1d 9D;�.r_ �J _ 'f P.rnn•I L —d >. Art I..mrur I—dr Sh, Tvo-CI Lnme_ 0 Mm 1 r19 Adjr. ,; Ir°m vnd Slre I nr r I 543 ? E 11y.. RSa34o�Cr_ Z6__ — COPYo.,.r5.r..._.,....Ir...:.. 9, H.- yv° <r•r bean mnanrd of n felony+ 10. No.• yw a .rvlarcd vny vl n< prv.ne�+ fe AI<chab< Be< rn9r C nr°I A<r r requlcr vna vl rF< Cev°r -e a per FOR ALCOXOLIC BLVERAGE LICENSE(S) ..r.. r... �" I, TYPES OF LICENSI ..A:....._r..R..,...r1 <rra...p, I I E.pl°in v'Y:5 vnt.er Iv n -mr 9 ar 10 ar vn v a<5 -rrnl nFi[4 rlrn'I br'eem<d per vl IM1.r vCVF<°I v +. 'tE NO. <� T. 0<par vl Alre +vF< Be-11g< C'11'01 e Y,apId I.— r°q" C- ,I A� _ _ iEE N0. II15 o Se<n _ Sv<mmer•<, Ca619584_ s.. Dorn rdirm_ OFF SALE GEI4R - _ GfCGpniMl(nl -- ... ., ... ,r . .n . . ° " " "r "'• "' "`r °` ° °" 1980 Co'1DITION <oCE leh !A<v °tlrrng<eJ Fe•eby ondm l<r FRIORI^�P S35 15 STAIE Of UOfp41'A Cvu•ry vl Oar< Ome P mm dnu b<d or lenv..' nm<d +� L' ], NAafISI OF APPIICANTtS) EDC 10 /1 /al ,:I .r „I 16 N - -.r _ ,r 17 E n. �r,n.n r -. •Irr�.h..rrr t <"rp' Permv _- _ _rLr,m•r.rr —�— Appbed urdv S,, 21015 7� E)n \°1 11'rrl. li.l•rrr Iln. Iris, Ir l) pnrnar rrl 1 o'IbiLl OF AAtI,Fp CO��hlun °^ ], TYPEI51 OF TRANSACTION(S) 10277 Foothill BlW, — Gry and 2q CVde Cv<nry OO / �/O pECEIPi NO d� d TOTAL P.aC't0 coca bn'391i3C =1d 9D;�.r_ �J _ 'f P.rnn•I L —d >. Art I..mrur I—dr Sh, Tvo-CI Lnme_ 0 Mm 1 r19 Adjr. ,; Ir°m vnd Slre I nr r I 543 ? E 11y.. RSa34o�Cr_ Z6__ — 9, H.- yv° <r•r bean mnanrd of n felony+ 10. No.• yw a .rvlarcd vny vl n< prv.ne�+ fe AI<chab< Be< rn9r C nr°I A<r r requlcr vna vl rF< Cev°r -e a per I I E.pl°in v'Y:5 vnt.er Iv n -mr 9 ar 10 ar vn v a<5 -rrnl nFi[4 rlrn'I br'eem<d per vl IM1.r vCVF<°I v +. 11 m,_ _d v, •—d -.11 r e and e Y,apId I.— r°q" C- ,I A� _ _ 13 STATE OF uurogNlA Cnvrry a -a ... ., ... ,r . .n . . 11 A t C .. C I ( i/ L 1 .• . SIGN vEeE _/ .L Id APPUCAIION BY TRANSFEROR 15 STAIE Of UOfp41'A Cvu•ry vl Oar< +� L' r. e. r.. ..� ... • n... [r°n ,... ...., r r, ,:I .r „I 16 N - -.r _ ,r 17 E n. �r,n.n r -. •Irr�.h..rrr _- _ _rLr,m•r.rr `� E)n \°1 11'rrl. li.l•rrr Iln. Iris, Ir l) pnrnar rrl 1 o'IbiLl bry <hrd P.r v.A,A ,.r rr ' ' i Au. vrY Cnorrr � -.u9 xn.rJ jj �j VF'ar'S'i ..'h','J%°w � r.rol.. C <Pf5 pe<e oaNn kw....•: .n •R+r,ne CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY ORIGINAL FOR FILE RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM No. INSTRUCTIONS CC • 1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property most be filed not later than loo days after the occurrence. (Gov. Code See. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurame. (Gov. Cade Sec. 911.2) 2. Read entire claim before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim to= must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. 7. Claim most be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915a) TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA II of City and .IP N Age of Claimant (if natural person) % Insurance payments received, if any, and names of Insurance Company: V� I � Expenditem, made on account of accident or injury: (Date —Item) IAmowtl Witnesses, Doctors and Hospitals: z//,,yr 111J'1662"� ei,, /6ck <c -allt y�,g /k_ T, 73o READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on follovvint diagram names o[ streets, including \orth. East, South, and Nesq indicate place of accident by "X' and by showing house numbers o[ distances to street earners. If City Vehicle was Involved, desienato by letter "A" location of Cfty vehicle when you first saw it, and by "8" location of yourself or your vehicle when. you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A -1" and location of yourself Cr your vehicle at the time of the accident by 13-1" and the point of impact by "X." DOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS /Z SIDEWALK IL CUR — d pxe�� I F" SIDEWALK FOR AUTOMOBILE AC /CIDENTS J L J to person filing on his behalf giving A SS /o F Date• NOTE: Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 72), CLAIMS MUST DE FILED WITH CITY CLEPy (COV, COPE SF-C. 9150), (BAR) AL- 73966 -R M11"TE OF REPAIRS CROWN AUTO BODY 6 PAINTING DIVISION OF E V P Ar INC. sNEET No.__oP__sNEErs 1151 W. FOOTHILL BLVD. UPLAND, CA 91786 (714) 981 -2081 & 981 -2945 C •.e.. - 01TE �` IJ�b�i Asul. A0011953 CIT♦ �V • 5C�`2S CODE Y t - ✓l J / win. S. < [<eN 48 naurnhw Md"I [ntwr mr P rn; , o Itw wmdetel am, We • no P,,nlQA, Ior IoN or G[meq 1. f, t,cele[ 1.11 In -11, In ow OI fln,+befl, eink. P [nY dli- 4ow beVOMrour nont 1. "S.. PARTS Ll, inT[T o PRICES b.seu an SbnEVd CAbbSUe, E Pd. YYPNOnt NOTICE SAPn CMgN MAY be Added for SPCRI Item+ not avauhble locally REPMED PARIS PAINT MAT' L _ JUNREO, unless Drina MS Return el Paris wINA order n plod. Abost NbmNe baud •n Ina mspeCli.n Atldmml Pads, or UPS, MAY M requned AN, the Perk his opened Gm+Se pnnou+¢ obuored. EStIMATE [EPIRES ]0 WYS AFlER DM[. 3 SUBLET NET anKS Den n Amby gknowl•dpd on •Dove wMd+ to um! ine emounl of Npbn / S SALES TAX a INSURANCE DEDUCT MUST 9E 4 pasbn uX of fA %vbm dne. a+onaMe +NNmj+N+ m wen lM+. PA 10 BE FO AR 15 IS R AE p, fST IIIATE TOTAL I MN read 1M aba, tamd+lq, aM aba woM1 Aer•by aelMrilN n ?� r (OeMnApnn Ny � S cods, NI 1 1 TOTAL S 7 e 9 L. 4iE 10 11 1Z fA 16 s� - 17 18 -- — 19 — 19 _ 21 — n 23 2a Z6 — Amiwp 151SWley IE XI E[me.q. //J�IYJ(D03 ADDITIONAL Wod DN'd BI i0 ISN ... MIEPAR AC NOES (VI UPAd IPI S ,I,,.,c, f� OPEN ITEMS (net) PARTS _ o PRICES b.seu an SbnEVd CAbbSUe, E Pd. YYPNOnt NOTICE SAPn CMgN MAY be Added for SPCRI Item+ not avauhble locally REPMED PARIS PAINT MAT' L _ JUNREO, unless Drina MS Return el Paris wINA order n plod. Abost NbmNe baud •n Ina mspeCli.n Atldmml Pads, or UPS, MAY M requned AN, the Perk his opened Gm+Se pnnou+¢ obuored. EStIMATE [EPIRES ]0 WYS AFlER DM[. MI car wAl b• dnren by par al.M+ la md+ lepeoed IeYS tl mY nfA M Npuu SUBLET NET anKS Den n Amby gknowl•dpd on •Dove wMd+ to um! ine emounl of Npbn I Mnby wan+ IM Shtute +i Lmeatlms and it Any uli.n on inq ¢wpnr ndunn SALES TAX emAbiment of +n roemn qw m Ny t'A% �m<rw wr moan, wnrtn n anal INSURANCE DEDUCT MUST 9E pasbn uX of fA %vbm dne. a+onaMe +NNmj+N+ m wen lM+. PA 10 BE FO AR 15 IS R AE p, fST IIIATE TOTAL I MN read 1M aba, tamd+lq, aM aba woM1 Aer•by aelMrilN n Adv. Charges (OeMnApnn Ny ee-1. P, ...... ..... l.r.l .............. dell. Pee uw.a, u.v. cods, NI 1 1 TOTAL S n U M 9 The subject map tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 1981, is submittd by Leo R- 3divide 1.67 acres of land into four (4) parcels An Improvement Security and Improvement Agreement have been submitted and are attached for approval. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the mao, agreement and security for Parcel Map 6228. Respectfully submitted, Alla-l� LBH:BK:be Attachments 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CMO STAFF REPORT� � T n4i� DATE: July 14, 1981 U> TO: City Council and City Manager 197; FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Map, Security and Agreement for Parcel Vine Map 6228 - Lamb - located on the north side of La Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues The subject map tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 1981, is submittd by Leo R- 3divide 1.67 acres of land into four (4) parcels An Improvement Security and Improvement Agreement have been submitted and are attached for approval. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the mao, agreement and security for Parcel Map 6228. Respectfully submitted, Alla-l� LBH:BK:be Attachments 7 PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6228 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LDUNTYOF SAN BERNARDINO,STATEOF CALIFORNIA F... . C.a.......a .w A[canr...i [aa.wvra r..`. rte`-. ,�i..�r r.� «L.•+.+w.� [ -M� � -❑ it El • 2«,M 1 a.bw 4rwM - wl Ow. Y YNwY. • Pi 0 CITY OF RANCHO CDCkIDRW IMPROVEY80T AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL IMP NO. 6220 MIN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is mad and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the hainicipal Code and Regulations of the City of Reecho Cucamonga, State of Calif um ia, A municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and - LEO LAgO ergld ,ter referred to as the Developer. WITHESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has regwe,t.d approval by the City of Parcel Map Number 6228 accordance with the provisions of the report of the City nglneer thereon, andaany amen ents 'thereto; located on the northaide of G vine between Hallman and Amethyst. a'Id. WHEREAS. the City has established certain requirements to be met by said nee- eloper prior to greeting the final approval of the parcel map; and, WHEREAS, the exec, Lion of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter Cil:d, and approved by the city Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pupose of securing said approval; NOW, TMEREFOI it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: ... <....,... ...w.....r..,: .., 1. imp Developer hereby agrees m construct at Developer's expense all date hereof. as describe d Se on page 3 of Ord within nine month from the date rvereof, as per Section g.12 of Ordinance Yo. 28. Z. The tem of this agreement sball be nine a months Commencing on the date of ertcutiam hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default an the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter pr.vidSd. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the pro- visions of this agreement, i riling not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of Circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of Such request. the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, Cost estivate, and suif, bendy of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial Changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to .1Ply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any tide to cause said provisions to be Condition by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. w S. Encr... h-ent pC emit, shall be obtained by the Deveinper from the office of Um City Englnrer prim to start of any work within the public right of way, and the (idie3b;11 Sball conduct such work in full Compl lame with the re. gulations contained therein. Non-compliance may result in stopping of the w➢'i by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. public right of way improvement wcrk re.,i red shall he constructed in con - Gir,nnce with is; ..... rd v n ,ct plans, Standard Syea flea li ohs, and Dr Standard awing5 and any special .\mend-dits thereto, C.eltruCtlon Shall Ipllm1: any tram 11tiont and /or other mndental work deemed necessary fee drmnage or public safely. i age 1 .IM.pROVEMENT AOREEMEtR y. 'Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple- tion; the City Shall have the right eto�andto any etover All llwork [innthe even[ of unjustified delay in compi on expense Incurred from the DPVelopef and/or his contract., by any lawful means. 0. The Developer shall be r"POnsible for replacement, relocation, or "- thear� uired component the satisfaction sfact onof thee Ci City Engineerpa and the owner i of the water system. 0, The Developer shall he responsible for rempval of all loose rack and n tneeadj amen[ pro rty orbs within Said frigntrof way. iron work dyne o lo. The Developer hell plant and maintain p+,Xw,y trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee ompl etion of the t, ,s cf this agreement shall be subject to the +pproval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of Said IYProvertt'ent security shall be not less than the amount shown or Ow: IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful Perfonna nce Bpnd n DOO 00 Material and labor Bond 17 IM on 0 0 IN 'WITNESS HEREOF, h, pl,tial hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowled;nd with all forma lrti es required by law on the dates set forth Opposite the,, signatures: ELOPER BY: DATE: BY NI ➢IES ' � •. L1 � � r_`- ATE: M� =� C Y OF RANCHO CHITA, CAL iFORNIA a na, real corporation CLERK ATTEST: tr..r•er;r•sun Bernardino }rr July g. 1991 _ __ _ .... - «,. m r v.«. ...1...m ,. _ r .a r.. ....... . .,,,,.. _ _heu C tame he �y CITY OF �Wft) CUCAHONCA Co:,STNVM ON XIO DOND ESTI'LXTE ESCRO.WLIENT IWIT FEE SCI;EDCLE Coy•) DATE! 10 1991 PE0.Y11 if G,S, •ILI. R.f,e... PY 4228 Cft, De., " ft.. 400 'N)T[: Du11 e., i—l.d. fee (.1 .,Itln. p.—il - p—.1 CONSTRUCTION COST EnIK%U 4 CONSTRUCTION MST 30.893.25 CONTINGENCY COSTS 3.1.9.33 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 11.999.56 FAITHFUL PERFORNAKE DOND (3W%) ---- IIJOLM LABOR AND HATERtAL DOM (502) 17,000,00 : .Spmllol FEE FEE SCH&U) NONINENTATION BOND (CASO) • 694 L. F. 6.00 1,164. J.z S. F. 1. 7E 6 381.5 A' I,, I .... �rh --T3T-- S.F. .10 181! 77-- =F. 551 C. Y. 1,791.0 E an S.F. I --r.TW3 A. r. 1300 tons) TON "o TON 110 ftr ... 11 100 S.F. 1.75 — — — — — — 0 7 175 .1­1 4­11 C.D . - m-d. FA. '1' 1.1— lo I.r,,dr KA % F A. EA. ---UQL2L-- 200.00 200. 1 — 7r-, G. 4 R�Val of F.C.Cw CUfb 10 1 L.F. I Mill v CONSTRUCTION MST 30.893.25 CONTINGENCY COSTS 3.1.9.33 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 11.999.56 FAITHFUL PERFORNAKE DOND (3W%) ---- IIJOLM LABOR AND HATERtAL DOM (502) 17,000,00 : .Spmllol FEE FEE SCH&U) NONINENTATION BOND (CASO) • 5r:):a ., Odl 1S 1P PREMIUM. $ 1,020.00 rmPHFCL Pt. FORttl C° 90•'0 Ci+'_R F.dS, t:e Ci cepuncil a' the City o-' Rancho Cucamonga, sat, O[ ce: ;f o: -va, and is. Lamb Ihurcdnef le; ?_ -aced a punu pal ) nave e agrcemeet - s cipel ac,eeee <o an stay) aIdre...let, e a:,; tes :cne et paalin prov n[s, which aid ay <e:-c nt, e- Ca:cd July 9 , 19 81. and vdentified . Prc:e ^c :', R23d a as .... v,.r :ed c0 one nnv_ n pa;' herw -. an0, principal is re. a under the terns of said er.Ot to Pa;cah a bow for the faithful perforvance of said NO-, :,O,fFCRS, on the principal and INO^INITY COMPANY OF -- CALU_Q& , as rerItI, are Eeld and ti--1y - O the cloy of F'ancb cutaepnga !per after called "C""), an the e -penal sum of T.:irt' four ThSesand and no /100 - - - - -- .. - tho•,. O Sta to z, f L theta s ( f CJ 0 : lawt^1 trey c0 be r _ pt".nt o e11 and e bins ou, selves, p heir- s ors, execu- tots r.ti CnI .:_- -a -ors, )Ointly and save lly, !it lysby chase The ... - • this eb"c.tion is such that if the above bo_:ded pri r. cal .� his or its he ;;a, executors, adn:nithe be,. snc cesscrs c. cos, shall in all C.mgs a ana co and abide by, and well ar.d strely keep and perfom the ....... ts, aondi- cs and Prc+S:ons in the said agreement and y alt<ration CSereof Made as •sere it Provided, on his or t r part, to be kept and per.`o,., at the ' -e and i the ran er therein apec- ed, and i all - asserting Ito their r true intent and and \ss,alle _ afy an' Gave harmless City, its O a° "e ' -^ snths.axM stipulacea, then chls obli,a; ion' shall becem, ,��,�y lean void; .,`,cruise, it shall be and r n in full force and .,fact, ertas As a - the OSligazipn zecor . d hereby and i n addition Is the face - t specif :ad theref.qthet. shall be ircleded ces's "nd - -able expenses and fees, ncludino reasonable at- `'s fees, er ^^ red by C,ty v s es fatly enforcing such obl :_orlon all ttoabe taxed as cos[s •and included to any judgeent -cro rrd. - f t Me, alterationpMetaae.ti.�stoo agrees tt;na eatna' ex- •e'^'_r_t p tn. work to be parft,el tnu heateec or the spec - lf:c..::ons a --a- ing the sarn shall in anlvise affect its chi:cafvons c. tea bond, and it does hereby G ive n.tice of such change, •xtersron of t;, —. alteration or add .... 0 to the any terns of the a r , corn' or to the e0 rk or to the specifications. IN k'IT! ;i.5S V ;!iLF20F, this instru^.cnc has Seen duly exeeutcd by Lhe , ,..copal and sure" above Maned, on July 9th 19 1 . — BY m in. • • Ra:m a 62) 351? PR6Y.1"l, $ 1,020.00 • L',a ^.n AND mAl5df :1= Beth) M1Eh CRS, the City Cmehcil of the City of Paocho Cucamonga, State of CoL forma a..t I term dean: Gcsvema tea a ' pr p 1`T have a tir a ed :Abp princtpal agr eez install antl Wm g a ed G CeL cer, o , dated let, 91h _, 19 at , and identified as pro- s ne. ty rezcril to an made a Part hereof; and, F :IR ?22S. under the terms o r said agreement. principal i - red lair, e.- .tetang upon the Performance of the work, to file and s ent t band with the City o.` naccho Cuca- he matt- s e the cirri l eo which reference ! e in Title is (OOr. Onci -,e c'. h Section )062) of Part 0 of Division 1 of the Civil Code or the State of Calif ... I.. ]ow, :x!n[Fa =, said principal end the undersigned as A rtp, are held firmly bold! Onto the City of Rancho No�o,�na :- ^-m all c - , subeontiaetors, laborers, material- man and Other persons•employed in the parfo[mancc of the aforesaid and [ red 1. in the Aforesaid Cnde Of Civil Procedure acres ^.c su of ei in :fie sum, of e Dmld v5 I i of a any kind, .ct to ..... ts due under or the C -r l g?ecarn will ranee het a e r ¢[ to such work or la bop na said s :re t': will pay the care in an a unt suit eeding the n t 15 vaEwil art for ;ad and also in c suit !s cthereot urgn thta v111 pay i addition es the face amount eas ; e at costs and fees, lr.au expenses and f isfullynenforcing le a[- Cc:nev's f d by City !- he c.ey errand to such o Ee a ana £iheasey successfully c a re taxed as cols -1d to or vac:uteG an the judgnenL aEereinnrendered. 21 :s herob': a ressly aGipglated and agreed that this bond shall - c benefit f any and all persons, conpan :e s, and • Egr -craw oez -x n;a led ;o fvle 9iaias u�der Title 15 Icen:^eno ng :l.n 10821 of Pa 1 0 '�: n a of the Civil Cade, s b5i ee 1tion to them or their assigns I. any suit c :. clip ..a s -bond. Shedd - l,ndition of this bond be fully p med, then this r stall become null and void, ctherwiae it shall be and r_,-ilh a.. .Ill farce and effect. ten hereby g e stipulates and a - that n '.ang dc, a.- _jin of rre,ltnration g addition to the terms of said ""en' c n tie a mall in a1) '^r t : obiinatienaconn this n bond, and it does here - bp w oo secofrany such change, e.Zeral.n, alteration or Ad- G :bon'�e I:: !;T--::]SS Ii'r'Mr, this i - rent has been duly a se cited by vha an.. surety nlnv.e named, on July 9th 19 a, Le. Lamb `��/ V! N y Cyst L' YYIiY CONI 'd NY oF C, ill VA fi BV� ]y_ e`t yfjh,Ul9,� RESOLUTION NO. Sl- 109' • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6228, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6228) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6228, submitted by Leo Lamb Subdivider, and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the North side of LaVine between Hellman and Amethyst Street, being a division of a portion of the East 384' of Lot 32, Tract No. 2326 recorded in Book 33, Page 45, San Bernardino County, State of California was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6228 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon; HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows; • 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and, 2. That said Parcel Map Number 6228 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City ^Ierk Phillip D. 7 chlosser, Mayor • OVIv nun o A unvn 01 TO A T.n111 A STAFF REPORT n46 L.,�-...,c c i LL T, DATE: July 14, 1981 oil To: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Map, Bonds and Agreement for Parcel Map 6725 - Daon /Barton - located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The subject map tentatively approved by Planning Commission on May 13, 1981 is submitted by Daon Corporation to divide 176.86 acres into ten (10) parcels in the M -2 zone. An agreement and bonds to insure the installation of offsite improvements have been submitted and are attached for approval. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the map, agreement and bonds for Parcel Map 6725. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:bc Attachments 15 t n: he !! f `- N , • j _• - :.. J . �:�•�_���. ?iii' .:. � �,rd 3 '•:`ti � pp :i ' .'. - __ ��., .:ice-_ ..',�/`'� 1,. •_/��(,y r' J 1' -. _• __- Lam-- -- I '^ ��T�irr' I. '•Ltr- i'....�3.... �: ` _ I t-.= / - -_.�f Ji -'Tin -31 =7, __ • ��. C"_ ,�.i:�.. _ i Fa.ce4,`� ! I I illL __ —tea__.. - _ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 67Z5 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7� 6L�Y'f Y TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6725 THE !ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA nl. 17 RESOLUTION NO. •�1 - +:� • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6725, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6725) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6725, submitted by Dann Corporation Subdivider, and consisting of 10 parcels, located on the Southeast Corner of Haven and Foothill, being a division of Parcel No. 25, Parcel Map 6206, as recorded in Book 59, Pages 91 -95, San Bernardino County, State of California was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6725 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows; • 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and, 2. That said Parcel Map Number 6725 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor :46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 14, 1981 U'LL-2T 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvement Extension Agreement - Tract 9539 Tract No. 9539 is a residential subdivision consisting of 18 lots located on the west side of Saophire between Banyan and Hillside. Due to prevailing economic conditions, Brubaker, Davis, Person, developer, is requesting an extension of their agreement to construct offsite improvements. The developer has submitted the attached subdivision improvement extension agreement which grants them a 12 months extension. The Improvement Security Instrument on file with the City Clerk will remain at $174,000. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the extension agreement. Respectfully s LBH:BK:bc Attachments 1� RESOLUTION NO. . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT E %TENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9539. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on July 14, 1981 by Brubaker, Davis 8 Person, Partnership as Developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Sapphire between Hillside Road and Banyan Street, and; WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Tract 9539; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension . Agreement and said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren 11 ,Wasserman, City Clerk 0 Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor P, • 01 P� CITRUS GgOVE CITY OF 'Z'kNC'-10 CUC,VION'GA fEINGINEERING A DIVISION VICINITY VICINITY NIAP N title: p I pg 0. BRUBAKER, DAVIS, PERSON 3128 Virginia Ave West Covina, Calif. 91791 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. JUN 29 1981 AM PM 71819111111021112131 A6 AI June 25, 1981 City of P=cho Cucartonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Attn: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Subject: Tract 9539 - Labor and Materials Bond 6 Faithful Performance Bond Gentlemen: Due to the prevailing economic conditions, we respectively request a years extension on our Labor and Materialmen and Faithful Performance Bond agreements, and hopefully this can be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting prior to the expiration of the said bond agree- ments. 1]iclosed please find a check for $100.00. If there is any additional charges in preparing any paper work, please noti y us. Thank you for your consideration. CHB /vr enc. �1A Yours truly, C. H. Brubaker, Partner L • • Ll I 1 u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 14, 1981 F!. TO: City Council and City Manager ��� 9i7 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Authorization to Seek Bids for the Carnelian Street Realignment Plans and specifications have been completed on the above referenced project and staff is requesting authorization to seek bids. The project budget is $400,000 which would include surveying costs. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council authorize seeking bids for the Carnelian Street Realignment. Respectfully submitted, LBH:bc - a3 • I DATE: July 14, 1981 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bonds Tract 9590 - located on the east side of Archibald, north of Hillside OWNER: Terrax Corp. 4766 Park Granada Suite 202 Calabasas Park, California 91302 Faithful Performance Bond (Landscaping) $29,400 The landscaping and irrigation system have been approved as being in accordance with the landscape plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept said landscaping. • RESOLUTION N0. c 1 1� i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATE FILING FEES AND APPEAL FEES AFFECTING THE CITY'S MOBILE HOME PARK RENT MEDIATION PROCESS AS OUT- LINED IN CHAPTER 8.10 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNCIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1.0 Filing Fee A Filing Fee pursuant to Section 8.10.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shall be $15.00. Payment of this filing fee will accompany the initial petition requesting a meet and confer session as outlined in Section 8.10.060. SECTION 2.0 Appeal Fee . The Appeal Fee as established in Section 8.10.70 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shall be $300.00. Payment of the Appeal Fee shall accompany a request to the City Clerk for an appeal to the West End Mediation Board. Provisions for payment of the Appeal Fee are contained in Section 8.10.070 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. E PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1981. AYES NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk 3d Phillip 0. Schlosser, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 151 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 -181 -12, 21 (PORTION) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER. OF ARCHIBALD R BASE LINE, FROM R -3 (MULTI - FAMILY) TO R- 3 —P.D. (MULTI - FAMILY /PLANNED DEVELOPMENT). The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. • SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessor's parcel number 202- 181 -12, 21 (portion) is hereby changed from R -3 to R- 3 -P.D. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: auren a-n,-C-1 y erTi ;� I NE El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT G�;G1h1049 GAO 2 j n 2 � r UII > 1977 DATE: July 14, 1961 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Barry K. Hagan, City Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -12 ITT 11663) - MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for a change of zone from R -2 2 amily Residential) to R -2 -PD (2 Family Residential - Planned Development) for a total devel- opment of 413 townhouses on 40 acres of land located on the east side of Archibald Avenue south of Church Street, west side of Ramona Avenue - APN 1077- 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03 ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting of June 10, 1981, adopted Resolution 81 -70 approving Tentative Tract 11663 suh,iect to the City Council approving Planned Development 81 -12. The Plan- ning Commission also adopted Resolution 81 -69 recommending approval of Planned Development 80 -12 for the change in zone from R -2 to R -2 -PD. At the time of the public hearing, the residents living in the adjacent area stated concern over the development. The Commission felt that the Conditions of Approval added to the Tentative Map mitigated the residents' concerns. We have attached, for the Council's information and review, the June 10, 1981 Staff Report. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planned Development No. 80 -12 by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. Respectful)y suWitted, r r Attachments: June 10, 1981 Planning Commission Staff Report Ordinance �0 CITY OF RA \0-10 CCC' ')\'G:\ STAFF REPORT DATE: June 10, 1981 10: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663 (P.D. NO. 80 -12) - MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in the R -2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church and west side of Ramona - APN 1077 - 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03 ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting approval of a planned develop- ment and of the associated tentative tract map. The project will consist of 413 townhouse units, to be located between Archibald and Ramona, south of Church. In general, the project meets development and design standards; however, Staff is recommending several modifications which will effect pedestrian circulation, landscaping, fire access, and recreational facili- ties. Should the Commission concur with these modifications, conditional approval as recommended, would be appropriate. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a tentative tract map and a total development package consisting of 413 townhouse until to be located on about 40 acres of land located between Archibald and Ramona Avenues, south of Church Street CExhibit "A "). The project site is ;-acant, and is not in use at this time. However, there are a number of mature Eucalyptus trees and a Cedar tree located on the premises. The project site is zoned R -2, multiple family residential, and is designated for medium density residential (4 -14 du's /ac) on the City's General Plan. The proposed project density of about 10.8 dwellings per acre is therefore consistent with the General Plan. The project site is surrounded by the following land uses and zoning: LAND USE Site Vacant North Single Family Residences East Single Family Residences South Single Family Residences West Apartments, Single Family Residences, Elementary Scl ZONING R -2 R -1 R -1 R -1 R -3, R -1, R -3 fool The project has been reviewed and rated by the design Review and Growth Management Review Committees in accordance with the Growth Management ITEM E Staff Report TT 11663 (P.D. 80 -12) -2- June lo, 1981 Ordinance. The project received a point rating in excess of the required threshold, and is therefore eligible for Planning Commission review. In addition, the conceptual grading plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee, and received approval in concept only. ANALYSIS: As noted above, the project will consist of 413 townhouse units Exhibit "B "). Each dwelling will have a two -car attached garage, and a private fenced patio. Five basic plans will be available as follows, (Exhibits Fl -F5): Unit Height Type Size Plan 1 1 -story 2 bed, 1 bath 936 sq. ft. Plan 2 1 -story 2 bed, 2 bath 1,022 sq. ft. Plan 3 2 -story 2 bed, 2> bath 1,122 sq. ft. Plan 4 2 -story 3 bed, 2% bath 1,290 sq. ft. Plan 5 2 -story 3 bed, 2k bath 1,450 sq. ft. • All unit sizes noted in the table above include living areas only; 400+ sq. ft. garages will also be provided for each dwelling. According to plans, all dwellings will be clustered in rows of 3 -6 dwelling units each, as follows: Tri -plex 7 (21 units) Four -plex 28 (112 units) Five -plex 2 (10 units) Six- lex 45 (270 units Total: 82 (,41J units. The main vehicular access point is located on Archibald Avenue, with 2 additional points of access on Ramona Avenue. In addition to the 2 -car garages, approximately 327 additional parking spaces will be provided in open areas and along the project streets and drives, resulting in parking ratiosof about 2.85 spaces per unit, which exceeds the minimum requirement. The pedestrian circulation within the project is comprised by a series of private sidewalks and walkways located throughout the project. However, the Design Review Committee is recommending that texturized pedestrian crosswalks be incorporated into the design of the project to connect dwellings with open space and recreational facilities, and that additional walkways be constructed to provide a continuous system. Conditions of ap- proval to that effect have been included in the Resolution for your consi- deration. The main recreational facilities are centrally located and include a swimming pool, spa, 2 tennis courts, and a recreation center. In addition, 2 smaller recreational areas consisting of a pool and a spa are proposed in the northerly and southerly portions of the project. In the southeast corner of the site -Z)I I J Staff Report TT 11663 -3- June 10, 1981 0 the applicant is proposing to construct a temporary retention basin to accomodate potential overflows, and to avoid possible flooding of Ramona Avenue. The retention basin will be fenced, (.Staff is requesting that wrought -iron fencing be provided rather than chainlink as originally proposed) and its perimeter will be heavily landscaped. The interior of the basin will be seeded with grass and will be used as a children's play area. If, at some point in the future, a master planned storm drain is constructed in the vicinity of the project and the need for the retention basin is eliminated, 8 additional dwellings (units no. 406 through 413) could be constructed and sold by the Homeowners Association. The use of the retention basin as a children's play area will provide a reasonable use at this open area when not used for retention purposes. However, such facilities are temporary. Therefore, Staff is recommending that additional children play areas be provided elsewhere in this project. According to the submitted plans, the applicant will be providing a sub- stantial amount of landscaping along Archibald Avenue, which has been designated as a Special Boulevard (Exhibit "C "). Structural setbacks along Archibald will be kept to a 35' minimum, with the average setback exceeding 40'. The setback area will be heavily landscaped and the existing mature Cedar tree will be preserved. Along Ramona Avenue, • standard structural setbacks of 25' will be provided. However, the appli- cant is proposing to construct private patios, bounded by walls not to exceed 42" in height, within the 25' setback area along portions of Ramona Avenue frontage. Along the westerly boundaries where the proposed development abuts the existing apartment complex and school, the landscape plan indicates a minimum of 15 feet of landscaping, including a substantial number of trees. However, the Fire District is requesting that 15 foot wide fire lanes be provided along these boundaries, eliminating all trees and shrubs in the process (Exhibit "B "). Staff has reviewed this alternative withthe Design Review Committee, and concluded that the total elimination of landscaping in these two critical areas is not acceptable. It is recommended that the site plan provide a minimum of 10 feet of landscaping, including shrubs and trees, at these locations, and that other alternatives of fire access and protection be explored with the Foothill Fire District. The Design Review Committee also reviewed the building elevations and architectural design of the project and was very satisfied with the style of the buildings and the amount of detailing incorporated into the design of the patio walls (Exhibit "D "). Color renderings and elevations of these buildings will be available for review and comment at the Planning Commission meeting. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Check- • list, and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment that could occur as a result of this project. The issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. —l� • Staff Report TT 71663 -4- June 10, 1981 CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 195 public hearing notifications were mailed to the surrounding property owners. Several property owners in the single family tract to the east have discussed this project with Staff to clarify the design of the project. No specific objections were filed or voiced. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed Planned Development and Tentative Map, and conduct a public hearing to consider all public comments. If, after such hearing, the Commission concurs with the attached findings and proposed conditions of approval, a motion to adopt the attached Resolutions of approval, with conditions, would be appropriate. Res ctful y submitted, ARR/ K. HOG CIty' Pl anne BKN;OK:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "B -1" - Phasing Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "C -1" - Conceptual Landscape Enlargements Exhibit "D" - Typical Elevations Exhibit "E" - Recreation Building Elevations Exhibit "E -1" - Recreation Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Typical Six -plex Exhibit "F -1" - Floor Plan 1 Exhibit "F -2" - Floor Plan 2 Exhibit "F -3" - Floor Plan 3 Exhibit "F -4" - Floor Plan 4 Exhibit "7-5" - Floor Plan 5 Exhibit "G -1" - Tentative Tract Map - Part I Exnibit °6-2" - Tentative Tract Map - Part iI Exhibit "G -3" - Tentative Tract Map - Part III Initial Study - Part I Resolutions of Approval Conditions of Approval J I,^ J! UT LIZ' .w. EP.OEVEtw En ENLINELn ___ -._ TM ACT No. jjer=3 - J R f 3..� p t a L "�•'f' S r .< :ir-. r �... -.-a ' JE. y t� S �t-4CS waLf 'IT -. 4• .A -1• :aa�: ^.ld i � A ?,Fk'' >' -.. 6—� 'C'Li6L:....,._.::.�.�i: er•. - • "':" r zl- �• t L 1 / Y -� -�' 'A•I, r. .I .T L 7 ;'.'7- Fy-rr''..��.I'�me>. P I a_ ° .J;•Ly 1 a r U.a_ •9 my Caai yR�Y r. ; ' F f r saris "^L ry-c'• ,r j....•Ll � I tt ; it i d F ��1 a•� taoL�q�aq � �"° ; .•hey .:siacr -.j ,�y"`� � .. S' 1 , /� C-2 C_4 T _ !.. C -2 _ a. •� NC- 2�a.r. SITE P" TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663 ..• .......... ......... ..... .. .. ........ -K-PEK UZ r EL SITE MTA rigs U .... ... ... 0 PHASING PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663 .. ........... is 7 7 r-T- jl� - J to, LIM CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN -" TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663 Iff c- L.MOSCI.[ �11EMRECT 4 I ; .:F i ur.ym,s n 2 n C- - 1 ;s'^7 1 la, L • • u Is CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE ENLAMENENTS TE=NTATIVE TRACT No.,iirsss . ....... .......... .... ..... ..... .. ........... Aff LAKD aw A� HMCT UN—M--- L I 0 !tt. m ® m CD -MAK �vrric i `rte a...t•"?� -.{� - 1 4.� O -r e�- vnr�oN 0 t Oorf '£ r A C 0 ^JIVII•J�a�aial K© TM • 0 "14 s -1. w 0 yvi OO nmza I= PUR&f7p QfiF@a I�Mff$f � 4 F v Ca ;:, IT RCOR PsN r��. W.YJ 0 • . F-01811rr rMO-S Me | � - � / �� s/ .� � %» / �� ��` .� rMO-S Me | � - Rq 750 ii�. C-iu5w s. Fti. Al 41 0 • 0 w 0 • N. i{ t f r �1 9 PAW tioOt w.N W.xr -4' 1 0 40 0 0 [[rl[TTAIIV!MAP C TEIZI` ATIVE ltNO_{MARY LlO. \DlSORIP110NJ TRACT .NO.'M663 ............... .........._.....,.,.`.....-.`.. e ... ..c .. e..,.0..,.. ' .:.L. 1 , 72" ji jf c O WW`NEER' /OEYELOPEE 1// d::..... mmw. SEi� - \` S.EET � J ®r, 1 ,• L Y.I i t. }ECTiON RA ,Jl ... 7 7•,-/ 15wnd�� T�'p° :1'o-q e,0lYww�nP wuau. r2,+u\ o■NINAL NOTLS. O WW`NEER' /OEYELOPEE 1// d::..... mmw. SEi� - \` S.EET � J ®r, 1 ,• L Y.I i t. }ECTiON RA ,Jl ... 7 7•,-/ III T[NTATIY• MAP TENTATIVE o�n4N M•wK L�oAk➢FF9B Fll9q Q]YNiB QFYF6 ?P.F6 . CNOINL[N ......_.,.....,:.,.,,,. m,mrm 7en.m : _ TRACT NO.11663 ................. ...: .,..., 0 11!, 6 3 w w TL Ni ATM MAP Mgt MA LLOAL DEECRIPTIONt OWNEO/DEV ELOPER LMOIMLIR TENTATIVE..........,.. ..T ,..,......... ................. TRACT 810.11663 !« 'µ Ty PICAL BRANNO OETA .ET �I I fOA i, 11 it SEE !HEFT, .02 4g17 TRACT 11663 MIRLBOROUGH VILLAS 12/30/80 ADDENDUM TO PHASE: - 1 -3 1. Number of single RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION family units: 93 2. -0- 6 -7 3. Date proposed to 12 -14 66 begin construction 8/81 4. Earliest date of 2/82 8/62 occupancy: 2/82 5. Model # and N of 2/83 8/83 bedrooms: 8/84 72,990 1 - 2 69,990 79,990 81,990 75,990 L 2 - 2 72,990 83,990 3 - 2 76,990 83,990 4 - 3 82,990 85,990 5 - 3 87,990 TRACT 11663 MIRLBOROUGH VILLAS 12/30/80 ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 4 -5 6 -7 8 -9 10 -11 12 -14 66 61 63 68 62 2/82 8/62 2183 8/83 2/84 8/82 2/83 8/83 2/84 8/84 72,990 75,990 77,990 79,990 81,990 75,990 78,990 80,990 82,990 83,990 79,990 82,990 83,990 85,990 87,990 85,990 88,990 90,990 92,990 94,990 90,990 93,990 95,990 97,990 99,990 1 -5 • • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee:, $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this' form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied • by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tract 11663 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Marlborough Development Corporation, 2029 Century Park East Suite M1550, Los Anaeles, CA, 90067 (213)553 -5131 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCER17ING THIS PROJECT: Paul Byrnes at Marlborough Devc Corporation. 2029 Century Park East. Suite e1SS0. Los Angeles, LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Assessor Parcels 1077-331 -08, 1077 - 341 -02, G 1077- 631 -03 , LIST OTHER PERb1ITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Ruildinn Permit fro-i City o` Rancho Cucamonaa Sever and water Per^its from Cucamonga County Watcr District I -I K i PROJECT DESCRIPTION • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Tract 11bb3 is a 413-unit townhome project on 39 acres on a cleared site. All utilities are immediately adjacent to the project. The project also contains recreation amenities to orovide internal source of recreation. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 39 acres DESCRIBE THE ENVIROnI.F.TAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORALATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The site was formerly an orange grove that has been cleared for several years. A specimen pine tree was saved and will be incorporated into _ 'the project. There are no cultural, historic or scenic aspects The site is surrounded by multifamily and single family projects, except for the school in the south. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? C] I- 2 WILL THIS PROJECT: • YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! % _ 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? % _ 5: Remove any existing trees? How many ?_ -X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: Property will be rezoned to R -3. Some eucalyptus trees will be removed in the Church Street widening. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Develnpnent Review Committee. . Date 4Z /29 /BO Signature.1�Z1 Title Director of Planning R Engineerin I -3 '� RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ` The followinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Tentative Tract 11663 Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Marlborough Development Corporation Specific Location of Project: East of Archibald South of Mitch Wr<t of Ramon k _- North of Foothill 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of o C'ub 9.n c': 110dn1 and ° of Tentative 5. Dedroons Price Rance PHASE I PHASE 2 See Attached Schedule PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL /i 4( ORDINANCE NO. .,w • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1077- 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, AND 1077- 631 -03, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD, SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF RAMONA, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES, FROM R -2 TO R- 2 -P.D. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A, That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • C, This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. 1077- 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03, generally located on the east side of Archibald, south side of Church and on the west side of Ramona, consisting of approximately 40 acres, from R -2 to R- 2 -P.D. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: J Southern California Edison Company r,,,, June 25, 1981 B.W. BOND City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Alta Loma, CA 91701 Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman City Manager Gentlemen: The Southern California Edison Company plans to build a double- circuit 220kv transmission line in the existing right of way between Etiwanda Generating Station and Padua Sub- station due to the continued growth in the area served by Padua Substation. The transmission line route will parallel the existing tower line route being to the east in Etiwanda, to the north along the foothills, and on the west side in the • Upland area as shown on the attached map. Double- circuit freestanding steel structures will be utilized for this line. The structures will be either lattice or con- temporary, or a combination of both. Construction will be scheduled to meet the load criteria for Padua Substation which is expected to exceed 4,000 megawatts in 1983. In accordance with California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 131, Edison hereby requests a written state- ment from the City of Rancho Cucamonga setting forth the City's position concerning the proposed construction of a second 220kv transmission line between Etiwanda Generating Station and Padua Substation (15 miles). The City's statement will become part of the Company's application to the California Public Utility Commission for a certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. I will be pleased to meet with you or members of the City Council to provide additional information if you wish me to. Sincerely, Area Manager RW:rdc Attach. cc: Phillip Schlosser, Mayor 'I MN� A, Y- EGE 0 ........... Tll • R/W 6122-L "`AA' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 V' � IY 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Conmittee - Etiwanda NAME F,-7— ✓ /41 1 t�l�a12 ADDRESS - 7,e/:.Q 244Ie L.'f. Si Af"7 PHONE G��S -/ (�) OCCUPATION :1F14-5a 0/C i EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) F Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please • list. 0 Why are you interested in this Position? What do you consider to be your major qualifications? REGE�E I2EP E,S: •L- t�•'{C "/ �i�- ![- iit -+2 �� -r�/ ��. -s-( �� �(,'G - C�•!s7- /''Qi, 7"L:.��d�,�, 2. 3. ��L.:I / /i�'Lfl �%• - /VL/fY /il ✓A` / /n�i� (!`.. /i L.t�.'J LCt),I Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. 1 POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • 0111989 -1851 Plan CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r U! IY 1977 CITI:.EN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON:Advisory Committee - Etiwanda Specific Plan PHONE O / /- / /'L/ OCCUPATION i EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) 2 I C-0//"5(7e' Are there }}any workday evenings you could not meet? if so, please • list. /y0 why are you interested in this position7� / ✓e i� ��✓����r4�/1 � ^�n � GIi7 v0 t7✓ �✓ n /^e','ez' / f tie what do you cc sider to be your major qualifications? 0 . 0 REFERENCES: '/'e) - Ooa 71 3. Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCIIOCUCAMONGA . CALIFORNIA 91799 • 1710989.1951 f tp` °`AMO"o�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A Y 1917 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Committee - Etiwanda Specific Plan NAME James Brinks Jr. Residence: 13181 Victoria, Etiwan a, a i ornia ADDRESS Mail: post Office Box 279 Upland, California 91786 Residence: (714) 899 -1279 PHONE Business: (714) 981- 093bCCUPATION Attorney EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) 19 High school Chaffey 1960• A.A. Chaffey College 1962; B A Stanford University 1964• J.D. UCLA Law School 1967 Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please • list. 1st Monday after 1st Friday and 4th Tuesday each month why are you interested in this position? TO preserve, protect and promote Etiwanda by helping to crea e a p an y w rc i can' be sensibly developed for the benefit of its residents and landowners. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? My participtation in planning activites started in Ontario In 1970. I was an Misory member of the West Valley Planning Agency. I have considerable experience in egal matters. REFERENCES: ' 1. 2. 3. 0 Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE BOA 907 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 • (71A)989.11151 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / < , > OP a 6 A 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory committee - Etivanda Specific Plan NAME ,TAM F S TAD M "S "N ADDRESS (c % 11 A LORAL 120117 AL %A L oMA, 64, / PRONE/ /044 989 -3 -2" OCCUPATION JNS A6 CA/7 1~K EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Al /s edvc / /v» a re 55 : B.A. MASTf PS AF6aLVF /� f/7lsoa LLLf.R efE�. 9h,s 6rRADoAYf- a, el, 47- MI, frr;rc Z ,v6 13U76J/ %�, Rcic ADm /�aT/+gn�r Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please • list. Why are you interested in this position? �e /rdM /T lim7` /iv Lrfri /A�d </fsr/7 %1 /Je'�0i �Rd ✓ fk� A 7f NO A,D.91L TO 9 /7,M6 -jI R!`7 (A'ONQL rw' 9 f NLY TD p L.n✓n„Y T6rn5h t/ ✓s ,�, ..r_ ✓PA1 . U ♦ M What do you consider to be your major qualifications? .wc rrrSrntC,.az1 46rvL - Z 4M 4vJ,.✓ro, REFrRENCES; GRAY o.F iJ NDmfS TtiC- r�OGA.vO �/4= 9fS -097/ Z. i7A4/6 tv4111?E'V_ 376 E45 N ✓[T - fin'^rM 72: G1Z_ - /OGJ 3. NbAd Src71 - >ryz A• 6ARf7 4"- ''^"r "; ff6- Vjs, Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. Z-,Vm /7 &A /iD dow f //e r, ✓ e'VII p� -7 .,i/ d ,. b.rY POST OFFICE 80 %807 • RANCIIOCCCAMONGAXALIFOR, A91710 • (714)989.1851 �jZ:�G " °^t,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n �j Z > 1977 CITI:= 'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Conmdttee - Etiwanda Specific Plan NAME ADDRESS 2170 V ll Way„ Upland CA g1286• 1156 N_ Mo ..rai.. P n R,. 6111 Upland 91786 PHONE 715 -985 -0971 OCCUPATION Real Estate Developer EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) B S in Accounting, UCLA; Graduate w k in Business Ad in' [ ti USC: self-taught 1 course Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please . list. None Why are you interested in this position? I, Willinvness to serve when asked 2 We own lad in the area- What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Twentv -five years' experience in real estate development Please see attached resum regarding nc REFERENCES: 1. 1 believe the City Council and City staff know me well, 2. 9 Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE. BOX 807 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714)999.1931 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION- RALPH M. LEWIS • Born in 1919 in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, Ralph PI. Lewis received an A.A. from Los Angeles City College in 1939, a B.S. in Accounting from UCLA in 1941, and took graduate work in Business Administration at USC (1944- 1949). lie holds the distinction of passing the California bar examination (1952) without attending law school, having composed his own law course. Mr. Lewis is licensed in California as an attorney, a certified public accountant, a general building contractor, and a real estate broker. Prior to 1955, Mr. Lewis was engaged in the private practice of publi^ accounting and law in Los Angeles. He became recognized as one of the leading authorities on accounting and tax planning for the home building industry. He became a builder in 1955 in partnership with Robert A. Olin, and in 1957 he formed his own building company in partnership with his wife, Goldy. They and their four sons -- Richard, Robert, Roger, and Randall - -have since built more than 18,000 homes and apartment units. Today, Mr. Lewis oversees the operations of the Lewis companies, which develop real estate and build homes, apartments, offices, and commercial buildings in California and Nevada. He chairs the Boards of Directors of Republic Sales Co., Inc., Lewis Building Co., Inc., and Lewis Construction • Co., Inc. These companies in turn are partners in Lewis Homes of California, Lewis Homes of Nevada, Lewis Development Co., and Lewis Properties. As a group, the Lewis companies are among the ten largest privateLy -owned home building enterprises in the United States. Mr. Lowis' many articles on the accounting, legal, tax, management, and financial aspects of construction and real estate have appeared in a wide variety of professional publications. He has spoken and moderated panels at many meetings, seminars, and conventions of the National Association of Home Builders, Pacific Coast Builders Conference, Building Industry Association of Southern California, Inc., California Building Industry Association, Young Home Builders Council, California Society of Certified Public Accountants, California Real Estate Association, Society of Real Estate, Appraisers, Society of Subdivision Appraisers, many Chambers of Commerce, and various service clubs and professional groups. Ralph Lewis has served as President, 1963, and Secretary - Treasurer, 1961 -1962, of the Building Industry Association of Southern California, Inc. (BIA); as President of the Residential Builders Council of BIA; on NIA's Executtvc Committee; as a delegate from BIA to the California Building Industry Association (CBIA), of which he is a Lifetime Director; as a delegate from CBIA to the State Board of Investment Liaison Committee on Fair Practices; and as a delegate from CBIA to on Industry Conference on Housing. Ile has served an and chaired many BIA and CBIA committees and has represented BIA and CBIA at various meetings with Governors Edmund C. Erown and Ronald Reagan, gubernatorial staff, and varloos Legtulalive committees. • l 7� BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION - RALPH M. LEWIS Page 2 of 3 • Among his many civic activities, Mr. Lewis served on the City of Pomona Housing Element Committee in 1971 and 1972, and on the Citizens Planning Council of the Los Angeles County Regional Planning Commission in 1972 and 1973. Mr. Lewis served a two -year term as a member of the nine -man California Commission on Housing and Community Development, having been appointed by Governor Brown in 1965. He chaired the Commission's Statistics and Research Committee and its Development Committee. As a Commissioner, Mr. Lewis made studies of housing problems in California, such as financing, building codes, subdivision controls, and housing for low- and moderate - income families, minorities, the elderly, and farm Workers. The Commission made field studies, held hearings, directed staff research studies, and proposed solutions to the Governor, the State Legislature, Federal agencies, and the Congress. Mr. Lewis was subsequently appointed to Governor Ronald Reagan's Task Force on the Home Building and Construction Industry. On a national level, Mr. Lewis is presently a National Director of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). He is a member of NAHB's Committee for Housing Low Income Families, of which he was Chairman in 1975, and has served on a number of NA1BS committees in the past. He also served as HAUB Coordinator for HUD Region IS, comprising California, Nevada, Arizona, Hawaii, and Guam. Most recently, in December 1978, he chaired an NAI18 committee which met with the staff of the Federal Office of Management and Budget to propose ways to simplify the paperwork and processing functions of government agencies such as FHA and VA. Ralph Lewis has .actively participated in education throughout his career. He has taught courses in accounting, taxation, and housing finance at USC, UCLA, and Los Angeles City College. In addition, he has served on many advisory committees for real estate and construction courses, covering such diverse areas as management, architecture, and financing, at UCLA, California State Polytechnic University -- Pomona, and Mount San Antonio Junior College. Along with teaching and advising on courses, he has lectured by invitation at many colleges, including California State University- -Los Angeles, Claremont Men's College, El Camino College, San Bernardino Valley College, California State Polytechnic University -- Pomona, University of California -- Riverside, Chaffey Community College, and Mount San Antonio College. Mr. Lewis has also lent financial and managerial support to a number of educational institutions. For seven years he served as a Trustee of Citrus College, being President of the Board of Trustees in 1969 and in 1973, and he is a past President of the Citrus College Foundation. He continues to support his aLma mater, UCLA, through membership on the Chancellor's Associates, an alumni support group, and corporate membership on the Dean's Council of the School of Architecture and Urban PLanning. Mr. Lewis and BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION - RALPH 'd. LEWIS Page 3 of 3 l I the Lewis companies have established -scholarships at Citrus College, Chaf f ey Community College, and California State Polytechnic University -- Pomona, aid have made contributions to these schools as well as The Claremont Colleges and various local elementary and secondary schools. Community involvement and support has Long been a guiding przncip Le of the Lewis companies and their founder. They have donated funds to Pomona Valley Community Hospital, Casa Colina Hospital, San Antonia Community Hospital, Loma Linda University Medical Center, the Hospital of the Good Samaritan, and Jerry L. Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospital. Other organizations they have supported include the City of hope, Le Roy Boys' Home, Tiny Tots, the March of Dimes, the Arthritis Foundation, YMCA, Little League, and numerous other youth sports organizations. Mr. Lewis' personal affiliations include the Ontario - Pomona Lodge of B'nai B'rith and Temple Beth Israel in Pomona. He previously served on the local board of the Anti - Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. In 1970, Mr. Lewis received the honor of being named "Builder of The Year" by the Building Industry Association of Southern California, lac. The National Association of Home Builders presented him with its Distinguished Service Award in 1975. In 1977, the California State :,ssembLy commended Ralph M. Lewis "for his illustrious record of personal and professional • achievement and dedicated service to his community, state, and fellow citizens." In 1979, Mr. Lewis received a Humanitarian Award from the National Conference of Christians and Jews. Mr. Lewis is named in the current editions of Who's Who in the West, Who's Who in America, and Who's Who in the World. In 1980, Mr. Lewis was appointed to the Advisory Board for the Security Pacific National Bank, Inland Division, and then in 1981 was appointed to the Executive Committee of that group. Also in 1981, Mr. Lewis was appointed to the Board of Directors of General Telephone Company of California. Mr. Lewis and his wife, Coldy, enjoy playing in duplicate bridge tournaments. Mr. Lewis tries to get in a few games of bowling each week and enjoys hitting fast halls at the Local batting cage. Mr. and Mrs. Lewis reside at 2120 Vallejo Way, Upland, California, and their office is at 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, California. u ``"' " °'"��� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C' ��� 0 C3 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Conmtittee - Etiwanda Specific Plan NAME David P. Flocker ADDRESS 6674 East Avenue, P.O. Box 331, Etiwanda, CA 91 PHONE 899 -1996 OCCUPATION High School Teacher EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) BA - University of Redlands (1958) I Why are you interested in this position? My wife and I live in Etiwanda and I feel that I can contribute realistic ideas toward a plan for Edwanda's future development. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? The fact that I live in Etiwanda and also have been a long time resident of the Rancho Cucamonga area. (Please see attached statement. ) . REFERENCES: 1. Mr. Floyd Stork, 735 Ukiah Way, Upland, California 91786 2. Mr. Robert Hickeox, 7940 Valle Vista, Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 1. Mr, Steve Butters, P. 0. Box 102, Alta Loma, California 91701 Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE BOX $07 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714)999-ISS1 Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. (none) I Why are you interested in this position? My wife and I live in Etiwanda and I feel that I can contribute realistic ideas toward a plan for Edwanda's future development. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? The fact that I live in Etiwanda and also have been a long time resident of the Rancho Cucamonga area. (Please see attached statement. ) . REFERENCES: 1. Mr. Floyd Stork, 735 Ukiah Way, Upland, California 91786 2. Mr. Robert Hickeox, 7940 Valle Vista, Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 1. Mr, Steve Butters, P. 0. Box 102, Alta Loma, California 91701 Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE BOX $07 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714)999-ISS1 Li APPLICATION STATEMENT - David P. Flocker (July 6, 1981) My wife and I have been residents of the Rancho Cucamonga area for most of the last twenty -five years. We lived in Etiwanda for over a year in 1957 -58 and have owned ten acres on East Avenue since 1968. In 1978 we built a house on that property and later started a small Christmas tree farm there. In addition, I have been ahistory teacher in the Chaffey High School District for over twenty years and my wife has taught in the Alta Lcma School District for the same length of time. We have witnessed the dramatic growth and change in this area in the last few years. We feel that our future is here in Etiwanda and vie recognize the need for well- planned development. I feel that I can make a significant contribution as a member of the Advisor., Committee for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. • E �`o �ucA.M�tic> 1977 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Committee - Etiwanda Specific Plan NAME JAJ CO �1tCk °2S ADDRESS 1 -7 N / =f Aie� upla,�4 `� PRONE 9 a Q - 'J 9 k0 OCCUPATION A ,rrn RR EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) uN'1 C So C 1 G1 LA :n7 S 1 �- 1970 —A.D. D 1A v O F S C, G r 1 9 6% - Fl B CN l< ,t,7G) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. A101V2 (Why are you interested in this -t- position? FT,�OnIJA hat 611 What do you consider to be your major qualifications? p? "/ Ni.✓� .ZNAf9 1� 619R REFERENCES: I 1. �2— �tt,�i�l?LsT�i7ZWW �.ovia V z. H2 S . �I,i1eA `i/3aK 271 7. �6P,Zr [1 C�GOX- i!'I YO V k \e VI SrA. C U Mo-' T A — Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POSTOFFICEUOX907 • ItANCII1 1Cl'('A \11)NU.%,CAI.IFONFIA91730 • (711)9aAg851 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "'D Y 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Cowittec - Etiw:nd, .Sr, - I — ;isn NAME ADDR PHON EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, Please . list. FY why are you interested in this position? -e ve/u rw Noe, sn �,� �K & what do you consider to be your major- qualifications ?A gmp 1 t i t g�w 010 �r h u;l,u f Fleas, attach a written statement containing any additionalinfor- ration you feel would be useful to the City Council. 0 1 , POST OFFICE BOX 807 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91130 • (711)989.1971 0 10340 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 March 25, 1981 Mr. Jack Lam Director, Community Development City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee Dear Jack: This is to formally notify you that I am very interested in becoming a member of the citizen's task force that will be involved in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. My involvement in the Committee would be as a private citizen and not s large landowner (RC land Company and Its associates do not own any property within the boundaries of the Etiwanda Specific Plan). My specific interest is a personal desire to preserve and enhance the character of Etiwanda, and more specifically, because I am, along with others, interested in seeing some form of a "historical row" plan for Etiwanda Avenue which would allow the use of older buildings rehabilitated for multi use purposes, including residential and small professional offices. As you know, I am currently in the process of re- habilitating one of the older houses in the City, and it would be my desire to move that structure to Etiwanda if and when the Plan were to designate such an "historical row ". As you know, I am rather heavily involved in working with the County in the development of a community specific plan in the Coumy territories north of the City, and I feel that I would be useful in maximizing the links between the City and County on the overall planning efforts. In summary, I think my interests in the preservation of the Etiwanda character, my desire to implement a specific preservation /rehabilitation program and my ability to help r 1 \J Mr. Jack Lam Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee • March 25, 1981 Page Two in the cross fertilization of City and County plans, along with the absence of any conflicts of interest, would make me a reasonable candidate for the Committee, if indeed it is the intention (as I believe it is) that that Committee represent a broad cross section of interested individuals in the Etiwatda area. JND /jas 0 10 Respectfully, l �, X�`jLG G� *Joseph N. Dilorio J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Committee for Etiwanda Specific an. NAME Neil 1. .iestlotorn ADDRESS 6613 Pear Avenue, °tivanda, Ca. 91739 PHONE 899 -'_620 OCCUPATION educator EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) eeuivalent of 3 rears riraduate :;ork; B.A.; E.A. : life teaching crcdcntial: administrative credential Are there any workday evenings you could not meat? If so. please • list. I prefer to reserve Thursday evenings. but arran=ements can bz :.ade if n�,ccssary Why are you interested in this position? - becaus. of a Convic- tion that citi,: =ns °uct b� e:illinc to Dcrticicate responsibly in their o ;,^ govern .ent What do you consider to be your major qualifications? I. a Commit rent to the d�;mooratic process 2. some prior experience rep - resertin.e co .;,unity opinion 3. the :illineness to expend the 9 RF RvmrrC i. :.:r. Cc- rlotoa ?.i -ht£o ot, "unt., 7tiv:andc. School �i:;trict r'. U. Bo.: 248, ai. 099 -1701 2. i.:r. Ji:., Frost, Rancho Cuc,mone• City Council 3. Dr. -o.x'lar. rc•.7ar, _ ;tor, 3tivianda Con.'rrratioma.l Church 712u :itivanda dye., ::ti. 99 -1186 Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE BOX 907 • RANCIIOCUCAMONGA ,CAI.IFORNIA91700 • (714)989.1851 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA O P V °. Y 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Committee - Etiwanda Specific Plan Mrs. Agatha L, Kleinman NAME 2500 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, California 91786 ADDRESS PHONE 714- 9825094 OCCUPATION teacher - home -maker EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) College graduate. B.S., M.A. degrees Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please . no. list. Why are you interested in this position? We own Dronerty in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and want to watch over the cirv's What do you consider to be your major qualifications? I have watched this city grow for over 25 years, and beine an intelligsnt,educated citizen I feel that I am well qualified in quidin? its future develon- 7. n REFERENCES: 1. Ralph M. Kleinman, M.D., Owner - president, 4ontclair "edical Center 2. Robert Dougherty, attorney, Covington E Crow 3. m Jack Lam, Director, Cemmnity Develonment, City vAndho Cucamonga Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE. BOX 807 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714)999.1851 July 4, 1981 Bhillip D. Schlosser, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Mayor: 0 As you are nrobablV aware, I have attended a great manv of the planning, commission and council meetings during the earlv paanning stages of this Young city. I am very interested in its devlooment. Since the properties which we own are all located in the area o4 Etiwanda, l would he very interested in being on an advisory committee during, the preparation of a specific plan for the • Etiwanda community. we wish to protect the identitv of Etiwanda while including it in the plans of Pancho Cucamonga. If I can be of assistance to you in this matter Please call me at any time. I am extremely interested in this matter. Sincere /iv yours, Agatha Kleinman,(MRS. Ralph) 2500 N. Euclid Avenue Upland, California 91786 714 - 9925094 • ^ �CL` " °4�, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA }} A 19 i7 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SER':E ON: Advisory Co000ittee -Eti Wanda Specific Plan ADDRESS 9713 Arrow HiRhway,Suite K Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 PHONE 980 -2244 OCCUPATION Regional Mama er 1heZ7il lam Lyl on Company EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) B.A, Economics Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please . list. Thursday Why are you interested in this position? Because of its impact E On Victoria riannea uoumuniuy, pius i Delieve i can conCrlDUCe e ping residents in Etiwanda achieve the plan they really want. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Background in land planning. REFERENCES: 1. 2. 3. Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCIIOCL 'CA.NONGA,CALIFOR \IA9177o 0 p14198f1851 90 WILLIAM LXON��om�ian 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 - 17141 980 -2244 • Statement regarding interest in Advisory Committee - Etiwanda Specific Plan I would be happy to serve on the committee, but would not want to fill a seat that someone in Etiwanda, who could make a contribution, would want to fill. I would certainly, be more than happy to participate as a member in the audience, or as an advisor or consultant to the committe, which perhaps, is as good as being on the committee. In any event, I am willing to serve in any capacity to support t Qt((i�w/anda Specific Plan. FIUPE C] • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT (:::t-:CC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - i o V!I r _ iY 1977 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: Advisory Committee - Rtiwanda Specific Plan NAME John G. Scherb ADDRESS 10349 Pepper Street, Cucamonga, CA 91730 (7 14) 989 -7168 PHONE 899 -1708 OCCUPATION Attorney EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) J. D. University of San Die ¢o 1976. B.S. Univeraity of San Diego. 1973 Ten ple in Etiw nda I am concerned that Et'wa da be developed reasonably. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Continuing invnlvern ot in the r"t g f —e-1 PI^ and r6 V :r tpria —Plan for the last three years and experience with Lewis Homes as a development attorney REFERENCES: 1. Manny Aguirre Branch Manager, Bank of America, Cucamonga 989 -1811 2. Charles Doskow, Attorney, 224 N. Mountain Ave.. Upland, CA 946 -1991 3. Barry Hogan, City Planning Director Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. 1:3�f POST OFFICE BOX $07 • RANCHOCUCANONOA. CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714)989.1851 Are list. there any workday evenings Wednesdays you could not meet? If so, please . Why are you interested in this position? As a member of Myohoii Ten ple in Etiw nda I am concerned that Et'wa da be developed reasonably. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Continuing invnlvern ot in the r"t g f —e-1 PI^ and r6 V :r tpria —Plan for the last three years and experience with Lewis Homes as a development attorney REFERENCES: 1. Manny Aguirre Branch Manager, Bank of America, Cucamonga 989 -1811 2. Charles Doskow, Attorney, 224 N. Mountain Ave.. Upland, CA 946 -1991 3. Barry Hogan, City Planning Director Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. 1:3�f POST OFFICE BOX $07 • RANCHOCUCANONOA. CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714)989.1851 I am interested in serving on the Citizen's Advisory • Commission for the Etiwanda Specific Plan for a variety of reasons. The foremost of these is the need for citizens to participate in local government so that community input is spread throughout as large and as representative a base as possible. I believe that this is the most effective way to let governmental action reflect citizen desires. Second, I am concerned that Etiwanda is a volatile situation for planning due to high resident emotion concerning development. I think this was shown during meetings there on the General and Victoria Plan. Such a situation is, in my opinion, too adversarial to allow the sound and reasoned planning essential to accomodating all representative interests. Finally, I do not have a particular axe to grind except as a member of Myohoji Temple. Rev. Sakata, Chief Priest of the temple, has consistently advocated a reasoned and balanced approach to all questions impacting the temple. I believe that this approach could well serve for all planning in the Etiwanda area, and I would intend to represent such a view if allowed to serve as a member of the commission. M 0 AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY July 14, 1981 1. ROLL CALL: Frost �,, Mikels_ti Palombo =, Bridge_, and Schlosser. 2. STAFF REPORTS: A. Selection of Legal Counsel for Redevelopment Agency. Report by Lauren Wasserman. B. Recommendation for Desi2natioq of Redevelopment Survey 1 Area. Staff report y Jac Lam. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -3 4 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING A REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA FOR STUDY PURPOSES. C. Recommendation for Acceptance of Contract with M.S.;. 6 for Redevelopment Services. Sta f report by Lauren Wasserman. 3. NEW BUSINESS. 4. ADJOURNMENT. I meeting to order at 10:25 p.m. Present were: James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Chairman Phillip D. Schlosser. 2. STAFF REPORTS 2A. Selection of Legal Counsel for Redevelopment Agency. Report by Lauren Wasserman. Mr. Wasserman pointed out that Councilmen Mikels and Palombo along with the Community Development Director and City Manager went over proposals which had been submitted by legal firms. It was the opinion of the Committee that the firm of Best, Best, Krieger in Riverside be recommended to Council for approval. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the legal counsel of John Brown of Rest, Best and Krieger for the Redevelopment Agency. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 2B. Recommendation for Designation of Redevelopment Survey Area. Item had been removed and approved by the City Council by Resolution No. 81 -112. 2C. Recommendation far Acceptance of Contract with M.S.I. for Redevelopment Services. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to accept the contract with M.S.I. for redevelopment services. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 3. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to adjourn. Motion carried unaimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Assistant Secretary • 0, nc v n ATOUn rTrn A MA NTrd STAFF REPORT S °v -,v C) of o U, z Vi > 1977 DATE: July 14, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA Because of the tight time schedule to develop a redevelopment plan prior to December 31, 1981, we must proceed rapidly toward that conclusion. The Agency must immediately begin the process by establishing a "survey area" to begin the study. Once the survey area is established by the Agency, the Planning Comnission most imnediately begin their work. A survey area is merely a broad brush area designated for study. The redevelopment area is to be selected from this area after study. Attached is the recommendation from MSI and a map illustrating the proposed survey area. It includes areas that have special redevelopment issues as well as opportunities for potential tax increment to support potential redeveloo- ment projects that will be developed and recom ended by MSI later in the process. In the meantime, it is necessary to begin the first legal step by establishing a "survey area" by resolution. .Respectfully submitted, .- JACK LAM, DIP.F.CTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JL:,ir Attachments: MSI Memorandum Resolution establishing survey area Map to illustrate survey area (Exhibit "A ") M E M O R A N D U M • TO: JacCityLam, ofDirector CucamongaCommunity Development CGM1;M1pjH/Rtb�l Oai CA476TA B FROM: Abraham DeDios, Team Coordinator Of i5^ Municipal Services, Inc. ?', gI ,oil, M o) ;�t2,3lat5 6 DATE: July 6, 1981 SUBJECT: Transmittal of proposed Schedule of Activites, Map of Survey Area, Form Line Chart and Resolution Attached are twenty (20) copies of a map showing the recommended boundaries of the Survey Area, the proposed Schedule of Activities for adopting a redevelopoment plan, a form line chart, and a draft of the resolution designating a Survey Area for the City Council's consideration for adoption. The selection of a Survey Area is the first step in a long and complex process for establishing a Redevelopment Project Area and adopting a Redevelopment Plan for the selected area. The California Health and Safety Code Section 33311 allows the City Council to designate a Survey Area by resolution. . The purpose of designating a Survey Area is to direct the Redevelop- ment Agency staff to study a specific area and determine the feasihiiity of establishing a redevelopment projects) from within the designated Survey Area, The Planning Commission, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency, will thereafter select an appropriate redevelopment project area(s). 0 We are recommending the boundaries of the Survey Area indicated on the attached map for the following reasons: 1. Potentially developable industrial and residential areas presently vacant or underutilized are included to provide for the orderly development of such areas. 2. Due to the anticipated extensive costs for infrastructure including the Deer Creek and Day Creek Flood Control Channels; the improvements to the freeway on ramps and off ramps to provide improved access to the proposed regional shopping center; and the need to explore greater housing opportunities for the Northtown residential area, sufficient tax increment revenues must be captured to make such projects feasible. 3. Finally, the Northtown residential area has been included in the proposed Survey Area to explore housing programs for that area. C Memo to Jack Lam 7/8/81 Page 2 Regarding the proposed Schedule of Activities, note that the Ordinance adopting the Redevelopment Plan is tentatively scheduled for the second reading on December 16, 1981. Following the second reading, the City Clerk is to record with the County the boundaries of the adopted Redevelopment Project Area. According to Section 33674 of the California Health and Safety Code, the above actions will permit allocation and payment of tax increment revenues to the Agency in fiscal year 1982 -83. If you have any questions regarding this memo, please call me. cc: Manuel DeDios Attachments: Schedule of Activities Maps (20 copies) Form Line Chart Resolution • 11 0 • RESOLUTION NO,� X A RESOLUTION OF THE C.L'S, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGNATING A REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA FOR STUDY PURPOSES W4EREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires that the area hereinafter described be studied to determine if a redevelopment project within this area is feasible; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires that a redevelopment project be initiated within this area should it be found that such a project is feasible; and WHEREAS, Section 33310 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000, et seg.) provides that redevelopment survey areas may be designated by resolution of the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby designates as a Redevelopment Survey Area that area described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds that said designated area requires study to determine if a redevelopment project within the area is feasible. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of thrs reso ution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 1981. ATTEST: I TFL ME a z ,17 r,� z • 171 0 E 12 nYMv nc n A wrnvn nT1n A wenw.n n46 STAFF REPORT of F UI 1977 DATE: July 14, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: CONSULTANT (MSI) CONTRACT Attached is the Municipal Services, Inc. (MSI) Contract. It has been reviewed by City Staff and the City Attorney's Office for both content and leaal form. Please note the inclusion of extra protective measures for the City, especially a penalty clause. Please also note that Exhibit "A." is the MSI proposal submitted to the City and reviewed by the Council Committee. It is too lengthy to reproduce, but is included by reference and specifically attached to the file copy. Exhibit "B" is the official time schedule which modifies the original proposal to facilitate adoption of the Redevelopment Plan prior to December 31, 1981. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Contract, if Agency finds said document acceptable. Respectfully submitted, . 1c JACK LAM, Director r of Community Development JL:,jr Attachments: MSI Contract Exhibit "B" IN • AGREEMENT FOR REDEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 2nd day of July, 1981, by and between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, a body corporate and politic in the State of California (hereinafter called "Agency'), and Municipal Services, Inc., a California corporation at 1661 Hanover Road, Suite 215, City of Industry, California 91748 (hereinafter called 'Consultant "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Agency desires to establish a redevelopment project area and adopt a plan for said redevelopment project area prior to December 31, 1981, and in connection therewith will require certain specialised services and adopt a plan for said redevelopment project area prior to December 31, 1981 and in connection therewith will require certain specialited services; and WHEREAS, the Consultant represents that he is qualified to perform the services required by the Agency and specified in this contract: PROW, THEREFORE, and in consideration of mutual covenants hereinafter con- tained, it is mutually agreed between the parties as follows: COVENANTS ARTICLE I. SCOPE OF WORK The services to be performed by Consultant are specified in the Scope of Services described in the attached Exhibit "A" (M.S.1. Proposal) and Exhibit "8" (Revised Time Schudule). If a conflict in the provisions of Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "8" result, the provisions of Exhibit a shall control, ARTICLE 11. CONSULTANT'S COMPENSATION ADD s'ETHOO OF PAYMENT Consultant shall receive compensation at the rates for services rendered pursuant to the Scope of Services of and in the amounts set forth in the aforementioned Exhibit "A" (M.S.[. Proposal) and Exhibit "B" (Hevisod Tinge Schedule) on a product /payment basis. The total compensation to be . paid consultant for such service shall not exceed $40,000 unless otherwise agreed to in writing by Agency and Consultant. Consultant will submit monthly invoices and a one page summary of progess to date, schedule timing, products completed, problems encountered and solutions achieved. Consultant's invoice shall be payable within twenty (20) days of submission, upon veri- fication of work progress and work product to date. ARTICLE 111. PERSONNEL Consultant represents that it has all personnel required to perform all services under this Agreement. Consultant's personnel shall not be employed by, nor have any direct contractual relationship, with the Agency. All ser- vices hereunder shall be performed by Consultant, its employees, or personnel under direct contract with Consultant. The personnel responsible for this contract and scope of services shall be: Project Manager - Manuel OeDios Team Coordinator - Abraham DeGios Engineering - Dwight French Environmental Planning - Joann Grudgen Citizen Participation /Relocation - Don Watson The project manager shall be responsible for not only the day -to -day work but shall attend all necessary meetings with the City and shall make all presentations required at public meetings. Responsible personnel listed in Article III shall be replaced only by consent of the City. ARTICLE IV, STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE •^ "'- "' ^° Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the federal, state, and local governments Al le performing services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall perform all services to be performed by it as described herein in a skillful and professional manner. Consultant shall comply with the directions of Lauren Wasserman, Executive Director Redevelopment Agency and Jack Lam, Deputy Director Redevelopment Agency. ARTICLE V. OWNERSHIP OF OOCIIME'1TS • All reports, files, and other material prel'ared under this agreement shall be and remain the Property of the Agoncy, and shall be delivered to the Agency upon Consultant's receipt of final payment of all services rendered and costs ue incurred and reimbursable as herein provided if not so delivered prior thereto. ARTICLE VI. OBLIGATIONS Consultant shall be an independent Consultant and shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever for or against the Agency. ARTICLE VII. TERM OF CONTRACT This contract shall remain in effect until September 30, 1982, unless other- wise extended by mutual agreement of the parties executing this Agreement or terminated earlier as provided for in Article VIII. ARTICLE Vlll. PENALTY If the services described in Exhibit "B" are not completed in a timely manner, as set forth therein, owing to the fault of the consultant and not a result _ of delays due to Acts of God, County, City, or Agency delays; and, if as a result the Ordinance adopting the Redevelopment Plan and certifying the EIR has not received second reading as of December 31, 1981; then the compensa- tion payable to the Consultant shall be reduced by the sum of $8 ,GDO, ih which sum, Goth parties agree, is reasonable as and for liquidated damages in such event. ARTICLE IA. TERMINATION The Agency may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days' written notice sent certified mail, at the close of each work phase as described in Exhibit A. In the event of such termination by the Agency, Consultant shall be compensated for all services performed and expenses that have been mutually agreed upon to have been incurred to the date of notice of temi- nation, less any amounts previously paid by Agency. "Date of Tenminatiom shall be the date which is thirty (30) days following receipt of notice of termination, ARTICLE X. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant represents and agrees that Consultant has not employed any person ® to solicit or procure this Agrnement other than employees of Consultant, and has not made, and will not make, any pdyrent or any agreement for the pay- - rent of any commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fees, or other compensation in connection with the procurement of this Agreement. • ARTICLE XI. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties. Any amendments to or clarification necessary to this Agreement shall be in writing and acknowledged by bath parties to the Agreement. Executed in duplicate the day and year first written above. MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BY Manue L. De Dios Phi ip D. Sch osser Chief Executive Officer Chai roan DATE: DATE: 1 _- • L] revised: 7/10/81 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • SCHEDULE OF ACTIONS FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AREA Date to be Activity Completed 1. CITY COUNCIL selects survey area. 7/14/81 2. CITY COUNCIL directs PLANNING COMMISSION to study feasi- 7/14/81 bility of redevelopment within the survey area, select project area and prepare Preliminary Plan. a. Resolution No. 3. CONSULTANT completes Assessment of Conditions Report 8/05/81 and Preliminary Plan. a. AGENCY STAFF review 4. PLANNING COMMISSION receives Assessment of Conditions 8/12/81 • Report and Preliminary Plan. 5. PLANNING COMMISSION selects project area, formulates 8/12/81 and adopts Preliminary Plan; transmits Preliminary Plan to Redevelopment Agency. A. Resolution No. - Preliminary Plan - Map of Project Area 6. AGENCY receives Preliminary Plan and directs staff to 8/19/81 transmit the following items to the City Auditor, County Tax Collector, other taxing agencies, and State Board of Equalization; a. A description of the boundaries of the Project Area plus parcels within 300 feet as per Section 33328(8). Transmittal to State Board of Equalization must include required fees. b. A map indicating the proposed project area boundaries plus parcels within 300 feet. C. A statement that a Redevelopment Plan is being proposed. d. A statement indicating the last equalized assessment roll to be used for tax allocation purposes. * City Council, Agency or Planning Commission Meeting • rev ised: 7/10/81 Activity Date to be Completed 7. AGENCY STAFF transmits items above (prepared by 8/20/81 Consultant) to all taxing agencies and State Board • Of Equalization. 8. AGENCY forms Citizen Participation Program 8/19/81 9. Citizen meetings on Redevelopment Plan. 8/26/81 9/02/81 a. CONSULTANT and AGENCY STAFF 9/09/81 9/16/81 10. CONSULTANT completes Screencheck SIR 9/18/81 a. AGENCY STAFF review 11. CONSULTANT completes proposed Redevelopment Plan. 9/22/81 a. AGENCY STAFF REVIEW 12. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY receives proposed Redevelopment 10/07/81 Plan and authorizes transmittal to City Council, Planning Commission. a. Resolution No. b. Redevelopment Plan • C. Form letter to public agencies. 13. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY consents to hold a joint public 10/07/81 hearing with the City Council on the proposed Redevelop- ment Plan on 12/2/81. 14, CITY COUNCIL consents to hold a joint public hearing on 10/07/81 the proposed Redevelopment Plan with the Redevelopment Agency and sets time, date and place of such hearing to be 12/2/81. 15. AGENCY receives Draft EIR and directs Staff to carry 10/07/81 out EIR procedures. 16. AGENCY STAFF mails Notice of Completion (prepared by 10/12/81 Consultant) to Secretary of Resource and distributes EIR. 17. Citizen meetings on Relocation Plan 10/14/81 and OP Rules 10/21/81 10/28/81 18. CONSULTANT completes preparation of Owner 10/21/81 Participation Rules and Relocation Plan a. AGENCY STAFF review • * City Council, Agency or Planning Commission Meeting '=t Y2V15eU: i /lU /J1 Activity Date to be Completed CONSULTANT completes preparation of public hearing 11/02/81 notices, transmital letter, legal description, and mailing labels. 20. CITY CLERK, in cooperation with Consultant, sends 11/02/81 public hearing notice to newspaper for publication. 21. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY approves the Relocation Plan and 11/04/81 adopts the owner Participation Rules for the Project Area. 22. NEWSPAPER publishes public hearing notices once a week 11/06/8! for four consecutive weeks. 11/13/81 11/20/81 a. Notice of Public Hearing 11/27/81 23. CONSULTANT completes preparation of Report to City 11/04/81 Council regarding the proposed Redevelopment Plan. a. AGENCY STAFF review 24. STAFF mails public hearing notices, transmittal 11/06/81 letter, and legal description to all property owners and all taxing agencies via certified mail, return receipt requested. • a. Transmittal letter. b. Notice of public hearing. C. Plan map and legal description. 25. PLANNING COMMISSION approves its report and recommenda- 11/12/81 " tion on the proposed Redevelopment Plan, making the finding that the proposed Redevelopment Plan conforms to the City's General Plan and transmits its report and its comments on the Plan to the Agency. a. Resolution No. b. import and recommendations. 26. AGENCY receives the Report to City Council and author- 11/18/81 izes its transmittal to the City Council. 27. COUNTY FISCAL REVIEW COMMITEE, deadline for holding 11/30/81 a public hearinq on proposed Redevelopment Plan. Committee submits 33353 Report on Fiscal Impact to Agency and County Fiscal Officer submits Tax Assessment Report (33328) to Agency. 9 * City Council, Agency, or Planning Commission Meeting Imo: " Revised: 7/10/81 Activity 28. CITY COUNCIL and AGENCY hold joint public hearing on proposed Redevelopment Plan and Draft EIR 29. CITY COUNCIL gives first reading to ordinance adopting Redevelopment Plan and certifying EIR. a. Ordinance No. 30. CITY CLERK prepares and causes to be printed the adopted Redevelopment Plan. 31. CITY COUNCIL gives second reading to the Ordinance adopting the Redevelopment Plan and certifying EIR 32. AGENCY STAFF files Notice of Determination (prepared by Consultant) on Final EIR with County Clerk and Secretary of Resources 33. CITY CLERK records the following documents a. Legal description of Redevelopment Project Area. b. Statement that redevelopment activities have been instituted. 34. CITY CLERK notifie7 Building and Safety Division of the Community Developirant Department regarding the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. a. Cover letter. 35. CITY CLERK transmits copies of the Ordinance adopting the Redevelopment Plan, the recorded documents, a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the Project Area to: a. The governing body of each taxing agency which levies and valorem taxes upon any property in the Project Area. b. County Tax Assessor. C. County Auditor. d. State Board of Equalization. (1) Cover letter. " City Council, Agency, Planning Commission Date to be Completed • 12/02/81 12/02/81 12/11/81 12/16/81 12/18/81 12/18/81 12/18/81 12/18/81 • revised: 7/10/81 Activty Date to be . Completed (2) Recorded document (including legal description). (3) Redevelopment Plan map. (4) Ordinance adopting Redevelopment Plan. 36. Ordinance effective on Redevelopment Plan. 1/16/82 37. Expiration of Action against Redevelopment Plan. 2/16/82 RANCHO CUCAMONGA HCNC11 HARK DATCS + CHART Mailing b Publication Fiscal Ilcaring Ileviev Citizen's Citizens Notices Deadline Meetings Meetings 7 /14 8/12 8/19 10/07 11/01 11/12 12/02 SCl,rt\on plann[ng Agency receives Agency receives Agency approves Planning Public of Survey commission and transmits Redevelopment Plan; Relocation Plan Commis ;on Hearing On Area Szlects Preliminary Agency and Council and OP Rules approves plan and PrOlect plan set Public clearing; Redevelopment Adoption; Area a11.1 and Agency receives Plan and makes Certification Eo er.0 tales draft EIR Findings of Final CIN plal\minary Plan _ 1 City Clerk NcaONS b Transmits Plans 12 /IR- __----------- -- _.___._ :nl exp ue uon - - - - - -- Ncadin.f of of Action Ottl\nan�e npe in, t Redevc lopment Plan V i. i M. � t L RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COMPENSATION & METHOD OF PAYMENT Delineated below are the lump sum fees proposed for completion of the various documents, attendance at meetings, and presentations necessary to the Redevelopment Plan adoption process. Fees shall be payable monthly as invoiced by MSI based upon the percentage of work completed for each work item. The Agency may, at its discretion, terminate the Plan adoption process upon the completion of each work phase as described herein. Services Phase I - Initial Survey Designation of Survey Area Documentation of Blight Citizen Participation Phase II - Plan Adoption Documents Fee $ 3,125 6,250 $ 3,125 TOTAL $12,500 • Completion of Preliminary Plan Completion of Meetings with County Completion of Redevelopment Plan Completion of Owner Participation Rules Completion of Relocation Method Completion of Report to City Council Completion of Environmental Impact Report TOTAL 21 Phase III - Plan Adoption completion of Financing Plan Completion of Public Hearing Notices, List,Labels & Return Receipts Completion of Public Hearing TOTAL $ 1,700 1,700 4,250 1,700 1,700 1,700 4,250 $17,000 $ 5,250 2,500 2,700 $10,500 Should the Agency be desirous of utilizing MSI's expertise for work exceeding the Scope of Services described herein, the hourly rates for appropriate personnel approved by M5I's Board of Directors would be applicable. IF& This proposal anticipates that a minimum of six (6) citizen participation meetings will be necessary such that effective community relations /communications and timely adoption of the redevelopment plan will be facilitated. In addition, MSI • will provide maps and materials in reproducible form and will provide 50 copies of each document, including the Blight Report, the Preliminary Plan, the Owner Participation Rules, the Relocation Method and the Report to City Council. MST will provide 100 copies of the Redevelopment Plan. _Z_ I� r1 U J ADDr IjEMS Ifi/ ))Oct)MEtJls I(JLLXI 191%1 LI, Etiwanda Specific Plan (Committee) MMrn,,Ray Trujillo �7i'ti/i[, Ms. Agatha Kleinman P.O. Bex 72 2500 N. Euclid Avenue Etiwanda, a is 91739 Upland, California 91786 Mr. Neil Westlotorn Mr. David P. Flocker 6613 Pear 6674 East Avenue Etiwanda, California 91739 Etiwanda, California 91739 Mr. James Thompson Mr. Gary Frye 7fA- 6742 Coral Court 9613 Arrow Hwy. Alta Loma, California 91701 Suite K Rancho Cucamonga, California Mr, Jim Banks Mr. Joe Dilorio 13181 Victoria 380 W. Foothill Boulevard Etiwanda, California 91739 Suite C 4 Rialto, California 92376 Mr. John P. Vlasic 13063 Los Cedros Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Mr. Ron Tannenbaum 6681 Etiwanda Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Mr. Jay Vickers, Attorney 99 "C" Street Upland, California 91786 Mr. John Scherb 10349 Pepper CucamongS, California 91730 Ms. Betty McNay ��4✓ 8300 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Mr. Ralph Lewis 1156 N. Mountain P.O. Box 670 Upland, California 91786 Barmakian Wolff and Associates 9375 Archibald Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 to wand Mr. Ray Trujillo P.O. Box 72 Etiwanda, California 91739 Mr. Neil Westlotorn 6613 Pear Etiwanda, California 91739 Mr. James Thompson 6742 Coral Court Alta Loma, California 91701 Mr. Jim Banks 13181 Victoria Etiwanda, California 91739 tic Plan (commi 1 Mr. John P. Vlasic 13063 Los Cedros Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Mr. Ron Tannenbaum 6681 Etiwanda Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Mr. Jay Vickers, Attorney 99 "C" Street Upland, California 91786 Mr. John Scherb 10349 Pepper Cucamonga, California 91730 Ms. Betty Mc Nay 8300 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Mr. Ralph Lewis 1156 N. Mountain P.O. Box 670 Upland, California 91786 Barmakian Wolff and Associates 9375 Archibald Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Ms. Agatha Kleinman 2500 N. Euclid Avenue Upland, California 91786 Mr. David P. Flocker 6674 East Avenue Etiwanda, California 91739 Mr, Gary Frye 9613 Arrow Hwy, Suite K Rancho Cucamonga, California Mr. Joe DiIorio 380 W. Foothill Boulevard Suite C Rialto, California 92376 -Six 'ti..7- %oil REDEVELOPMENT PF Lk J 1, - ----- 31-i vi ..... . . . . . . += . -- �71: L4 R IS i �C �Ir�T FN: =77 I , I, j