HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/09/02 - Agenda PacketC�CA.H0,1.
�� CY Cil1' OF
{ R�'A C�l t NUD �rAM�OXNVA
l _ r CITY OU1`UL
O Z L'11.7L, NDA
>
j977 Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Member 2. 1981, Regular Meeting
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead-
line for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and
third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office recei ms all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Flag Salute.
B. Roll Cali: Frost, Mikels_, Palombo_, Bridge_, and Schlosser_
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS,
A. September 8 - 7:00 P.M. -- Historical Commission -- Lion's Park
Community Center.
B. September 15, 6:00 p.m. -- Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee --
Etiwanda Intermediate School.
3, CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time with-
out discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -9 -2, in the amount of 1
$136,401,69.
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Johnnie and Loretta 3
Flares, for Off Sale General, Alta Loma Liquor, 9638 Base Line.
c. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Stater Bros. 7
Market No. 53, 8770 Base Line, for Off Sale General.
d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Stater Bros. 8
Market No. 78, 9750 19th Street, for Off Sale General,
City Council Agenda
6'Z
e. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and
Lien Agreement for Parcel Map 6645, located south of
Highland, west of the Devore Freeway.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP 6645,
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM EDWARD HOOVER.
September 2, 1981
9
10
11
f. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6911 and REal Property Improve-
ment Contract and Lien Agreement - Heller, located on
the south side of Arrow Route east of Haven Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -133
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL 4AP NUMBER 6911 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NNMRFR 5911).
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM WALTER E. HELLER FACTORS, INC.
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN THE SAME.
g. Acceptance of Map, Bonds and Agreement for Tract 9638 -
Crismar Development, located on the northwest corner of
Archibald and Lemon Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SEC!IRITY,
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9638.
16
17
18
24
25
h. Annexation No. 5 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 34
1 for Tract 9638, located on the northwest corner of
Archibald and Lemon Avenues to the Landscape Maintenance
District No, 1. Staff recommends approval.
City Council Agenda -3- September 2, 1981
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -136 35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LAND-
SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXA-
TION NO. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT
OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OBJECTIONS THERETO.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -137 37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION
NO. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1.
i. Recommend Council approve the advertising for bids on a 41
contract for street striping services for the October
1981 to October 1982 year.
j. Concur with the Administrative Regulations for Equestrian 42
Advisory Committee as established by the Planning
Commission.
k. Approval of Minor Revisions in the West End Mediation 44
Board Agreement.
1. Set for Public Hearing on September 16, 1981:
Environmental Assessment and Zone Change No. 81 -02 - Lewis.
A proposed change of zone from R -1 (single family resi-
dential) to R -1- 20,000 (single family residential -
20,000 sq. ft. lot minimum) on 52 acres of land located on
the south side of Summit Avenue, between Etiwanda and
East Avenues - APN 22- 181 -04 through 09, 26, and 43.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 80 -03 48
(TT 11610). A change of zone from A -1 (limited agri-
culture) to R- 2 -P.D. (multiple family /planned develop-
ment) for the development of 28 condominiums on 4.55
acres of land located on the west side of Turner Avenue
between Church Street and Base Line.
City Council Agenda -4- September 2, 1981
ORDINANCE NO. 150 (second reading) 48
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208 - 061 -03 FROM A -1
(LIMITED AGRICULTURE) TO R- 2 -P.D. (MULTI-
FAMILY /PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) AND GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE BET-
WEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE.
B. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 81 -03 AND ENVIRONMENTAL 49
ASSESSMENT - An amendment to the Zoning Code adding
Section 61.023 (f) implementing the Industrial Specific
Plan.
ORDINANCE NO. 154 (second reading) 49
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LAND USE AND BUILDING
REGULATIONS AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE N0, 17 OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIFICALLY
ADDING SECTION 61.023 (F) TO THE ZONING CODE
PROVIDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A SPECIFIC
PLAN.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A. REQUEST FOR REFUSE RATE INCREASE. 50
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
• 7. ADJOURNMENT.
The regular meeting of the City Council of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga was held
in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, September
2, 1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D.
Schlosser.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur H.
Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present were; City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney,
Ted Hopson; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director,
Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community
Services Director, Bill Holley; and Deputy City Clerk, Beverly Authelet.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Councilman Mikels stated that the SANBAG Board passed a motion today that in
the future cards will be placed on buses to let the public know that fares will
be increasing if funds from the federal government are withheld.
b. Mr. Wasserman requested an executive session following the meeting regarding
pending litigation.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
Councilman Palombo requested that item "k" be removed. He stated he Wanted this
voted on separately since he was not in favor.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -9 -2, in the amount of $136,401.69.
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Johnnie and Loretta Flores, for
Off Sale General, Alta Loma Liquor, 9638 Base Line.
C. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Stater Bros. Market No. 53, 8770
Base Line, for Off Sale General.
d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Stater Bros. Market No. 78, 9750
19th Street, for Off Sale General.
e. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for
Parcel Map 6645, located south of Highland, west of the Devote Freeway.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP 6645.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING, A REAL
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
FROM EDWARD HOOVER.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF ^RNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6911 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 6911),
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
0- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
RE..L PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM WALTER E. HELLER FACTORS, INC.
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN THE SAME.
g. Acceptance of Map, Bonds and Agreement for Tract 9638 - Crismar Development
located on the northwest corner of Archibald and Lemon Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9638.
h. Annexation No. 5 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract 9638,
located on the northwest corner of Archibald and Lemon Avenues to the Land-
scape Maintenance District No. 1. Staff recommends approval.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -136
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT:
DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO
THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS
THERETO.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -137
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINAY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION
NO. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1.
I. Recommend Council approve the advertising for bids on a contract for street
striping services for the October 1981 to October 1982 year.
J. Concur with the Administrative Regulations for Eauestrian Advisory Committee
as established by the Planning Commission.
k--- Annrnvn }- of- Hinor- Rev4a4ene- in- ehe -Wese- End- Medine4en- Bnerd- Agreemene. Item
removed for discussion by Councilman Palumbo.
1. Set for Public Hearing on September 16, 1981: Environmental Assessment and
Zone Change No. 81 -02 - Lewis. A proposed change of zone from R -1 (single
family residential) to R- 1- 20,000 (single family residential - 20,000 sq. ft.
lot minimum) on 52 acres of land located on the south side of Summit Avenue,
between Etiwanda and East Avenues - APN 22- 181 -04 through 09, 26, and 43.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Consent Calendar item "k ".
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser.
NOES: Palombo. ABSENT: None.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
4A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 80 -03 (TT 11610). A change
of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R- 2 -P.D. (multiple family /planned
development) for the development of 28 condominiums on 4.55 acres of land located
on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 150.
ORDINANCE NO. 150 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 208- 061 -03 FROM A -1 (LIMITED AGRI-
CULTURE) TO R- 2 -P.D. (MULTI - FAMILY /PLANNED DEVELOP-
MENT) AND GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF
TURNER AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 150. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Councilman Bridge asked if the only issue before Council was the zone change.
Mr. Lam said that it was.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the zone change request
and Ordinance No. 150. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels,
Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
Mr. Wasserman said that because there h-d been several neighborhood meetings to
work out problems, not many were present to oppose this zone change.
4B. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 81 -03 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. An amendment
to the Zoning Code adding Section 61.023 (f) implementing the Industrial Specific
Plan.
Mr. Wasserman stated that again the attendance was low with no opposition since
staff had been holding meetings for over 11 to work on problems.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 154.
3
AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 17 OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIFICALLY ADDING SECTION 61.023
(F) TO THE ZONING CODE PROVIDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION
OF A SPECIFIC PLAN.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. .lotion
carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Frost to approve Ordinance No. 154 and approve
the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
5A. REQUEST FOR REFUSE RATE INCREASE. Harry Empey presented the staff report.
Mr. Empey stated that the Council would not be granting a rate increase this evening.
Instead they would be discussing this and having questions answered. The item needed
to be advertised for a public hearing.
Council asked how many senior citizens were there that used the special rate. Mr.
Burr, owner of Rancho Disposal, stated there were approximately 5% senior citizens.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost to set September 16 for public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser announced that he would not be present at that Council meeting, but
would be on vacation.
ADDED ITEMS
Councilman Mikels said that the Chamber of Commerce had been working on t',.e first
annual wine festival for Rancho Cucamonga. Michael Jauron, Manager of C. 2 Chamber,
and Bob Salazar, First Vice President and Chairman of the Committee, were present
and explained details of the festival. Council requested a written report from the
Chamber outlining the financial commitments.
Councilman Bridge stated that several months ago Council instructed Mr. Hollev to
negotiate for some park land. It has been suggested that a Committee of two Council
members work with Hill on this project.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to appoint Councilmen Bridge and Frost
to work with Mr. Holley in negotiating for park land. Motion carried unanimously
5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser said he had another item. He had been contacted by a man in Etiwanda
who had a dog kennel. He feels we are forcing him to license each dog in the kennel.
Mayor asked Council what to do in this case.
Mr. Wasserman said that perhaps it would be best if staff identified the problem
and outline some possible solutions for a future meeting.
7. AD.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 7:53 o.m. to a legal session, not to
reconvene.
Resnectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
------
- - - - --
yy
1p,
R667
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
, T
--• --� WARRANT RECONCILIATION 02 /IL
PAGE l '
n
WARR
P VEN / V E N 0 0 R .. N
� r'�A
A
•r_-- . --- - -4
DARE - ,1 11RNAL -. k 'k.;0 [SCWNT?
_
-.:. NET-, -
' ''
i4j. •.,. i dX'. �'
-11147
•01)364
'uLi:ea
.,.._- '.REUERENCE x.
-" �'�•�f'a'�.�y. J- �I
^
j
5 ( p
AT
CO
1_.0_.1.].4. -sue
l
_
_
CCRIONVAASY CURLpTI ION
SM
47%13291
16.00-
01366
Z2 )399 SC
1200 Bf NK UOFNAME RICA
0%U137/ellli
9:1947.83
01367
01369
4650 GLEN99DALE F-EDER AL SaAYING'9".
OEN TILE(
^.•'•'
•""�
eB /l] /9l - . ^' -- _ --
9 - 4
.--°
T
I,^
I
.01370
22018 CCI `1.I EFEFOF..RN 14711
SSF 4
/l3 /BI ^}; 71 1.` "r''
'-
1r
C +rf -=
/R
01371
L
7905 PUl>LI[EEMPP REi1 NEN
ERYy7
ENTRS alJe.^,'1:.
.^.2�-l- tii''+• -s.-n
0 %lt %BI_'i`+'�,tiv'^a"l.' 1 -x °-
y34)4.28
-`- Tom' .A"'- 43"i-"-".".-'Q�
I
r
0JI73
C
)907 GUBLE FINANCSEC5 AL PUB``
8%20%0] -
10.422:69
2`95.97
- - -
n
�L
IC
7990 GURNAL,
-BJA0.
39.00-
O]A00
0]639
RICHARD(
VO LID Fp0.M555 AL
-^ -_-
eii9iet'!•-r -)T -^• ^n-. --
9/02/0 .-...� "•'- ` -T' -•'
- L5.00-
• ---i ree5; s+•- -�-• -. ;. -,
0]642
1IGNNEENTT
V 1D FORRMS 6LI GNMEMT
-'
9%02%01
-07643
VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT
- ,�
"'
9102/0]- - ""` ---' -" "'""-" -' -" -'
- -
- -- -- - --
F•
07644
0004 A -1 LINEN
AN L
NGGEN'EY
9/02¢/01
155.00
I
OT646
0125 CTT ON TRAVEL
y
9/02/0]
61.32
n
07647
01640
0135 AERIAL ENTEPPRISFS
0165 AGRICULTURAL
- ^ -" - -'
9/02/dL •- - -- - - - --- _T- ..r•.T
96.00
`44.40
_
'• `
'•
07649
COMM
0305 AXC0.IC AN ELECTRIC
-
9/02/0
9/02101 - -1-
-
-
07650.
0400 ANDERSON MRS BEVERLY
, -_;
9/0 /B1 _ _
62.80
250.00
C7651
07652
04)0 ANGELS HbROWARO
0495 ARROW TRUCK BODIES
- ,_� _- ��.,
9/02/0( - -- _ - -
9102181
5150
r
07653
0525 ASSOCIEE TED ENGINEERS
9/02/81
2.146.50
n
i�
OT655
1150 D NGFOFT -NMI TNELYYJ[O
-' ^. -^"'-
9%02%91'" '•'"
45.00
IEI
07656
1201 BANK OF AMERICA Ni
C SA
--"-
9/02/01 - -�• ^'-�_ "_- �• ^)��1.'..
- -- 14.96
- ^'- •••srtc�- T- ••---- r• -.-•+
07657
`1418 BFN(T ENGINEERING
CORP
9102/0l --
319,03
01669
1450 01 SHOP CONMAH YS
;.- ,,,...._�..
9%02/8] - --- -- .___.y. ___.,. - L,_._ ...- .._..;_�.�..�__..
-.. 98.00
076610
1767 BUILDING NEWS INC
9102181
01662
9%02/X1
1967.36
I ^
663
1937 CSUPSS00UOE epALTOR
59 '•' --- ^ --
_ -__.
_. ___•.. -. - -- .,-- _-- _.___- �__
150.00
-OT
01664
7040 CCALIF VAK F02NDATION
;•
9%02%0]
4.05
) -_ .
01666
2J15 CITYY RFN pE NEVr
MARK _'.
9%02%0E
S]{ 00
n
0166)
23)5 COCA COLA BOTTLING
-
GO
9/02/81 -'� - - -' - - - -- • -^ - - - -' -'
15.00
01660
2336 COCA COLA BOTTLING
CO
910218L
215.27
151.00
07669
016)0
2350 COLEMAN DAN
2390 CONCRETE CGRING
9 /02 /BL
14.40
I n
07611
CO
2525 CROOK COMPANY
., .- -. -
9 /02 /0l
9/0210] - - .....,.- - - -_
2qp
^IY
07672
07673
0]675
C
22560 ROMN PRRpINTER T55
VOID
OJC ALEAS
OIST-
_... - - -_...
910222181
521.01
11.76
;
07616
07618
1614 INOOCORPER
pHE WALDEN
EMF.LEHPINE
_..
.- ... _______..�._..
9R01]/at " ". -
9/02/03
1.105.76
12.12
1,410.00
3303
3303 CO
9102101
366.00
n
07679
' ]340 ENLI NEEkING- MEMSMRECORD
""
9%02/81 - - - -' - _ _
246.00
�i
01680
4050 FED MART - FINANCE
_
9/02/81 -
26.00
L23.64
- - --g. - -- - -- --
:0]601
07682
4132 FORSCO M MT CORP
4146 FP F.EWAY TORES
9 /OZ /6l
9/02/81
333.26
07683
4485 GENERAL INOING CO
- .-
9102101 -' - --- ' -• " -'
39.75
0 )6E4
0)685
4600 GENJE CONSULTANTS NU
4630 GGENGE
CO
q /02 /8I
63.75
815.61
Bi606
4930 N4YE5 GRY
9/07/01
1.659.80
01607
4866 HILL KARL
' " " "" - --
9/02/0] -' - - - - ------ - - -..- _. _.
Z32.50
.0)6fl0
0 60
4901 IH3LLEY MM - PETTY
49L5 HULLIDAY COCK CO INC
CASH
_
9 /OZ /BL .. -.
9 /012 /PI
3360
9t t9
_._, -.._ _ - _ ., �,•
'
07690
07691
4940 HUNERS TREE SURGERY
4980 HUD CONSTRUCTION SPEC
-'
-� -
9/0 /8 - 11,030.00
9/02/81 - - - - - -'_` ` "-"
r,
01692
071193
5110 IBM
5290 IPISH CONSTRUCT
9/02/81
- iT
9/02/80 -
147.7E
].
I n
14
07094
SFHVICE
6160 JOBS
9/02/01
0r 056001:9005
.n
a71,6
6115 JOBS AVAILABLE
AVAIL
6510 K f C COMPANY
_
9/02/81 -"' -' - - - -
46.53
40.04
-- -- -- -- - - --
' �I
Y•
.0if.96
0169)
6600 KING ENGINEERS, L
0
9/02/9] 524]15.00
'0!(99,
6613 KNUT SE Nr GI NN6
9 /OI /BL
9/02/Bl
-
n
07 9.
SONS
_
_
22.10
45.00
01700
6645 LAMBEI
9%02/01.
250.00
n
19 A867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Ix
WARRANT
RECONCILIA "i;ON
_� 9102191
1 WARR / VEN i V E N 0 O R N A M
E
J
DISCOUNT NET
OATS
REFERENCE
07701
- 6725 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES..
- 9/0:/81
-
-- - 450.
07702
6830 LOGDI= SALLY
9/02/81
22.
07703
6875 LAMES POWER TOOLS
9/02/81
62.
i. 07704
718D MARSH 6 NC LENNGN INC
9102/81
311.
rOTT05
"_'7240 MC MAUGHAN PE= ROSIRT
_'- -'- 9/02/81 ""-
- - ' - " "" -
- - - _ 110.
07706
7302 MIJAC ALARM SYSTEMS INC
9/02/8
35.
07707
73150 MILLS ASSOC, ICHARD
9/02/81
423.
07/09
LL
7500 MAILHACI
BEXYUOFASCIENCE
9%02%81 `�"
� -
'""' 10.
01710
7511 NATL REC C PARK ASSOC
9/02/81
25.
0171
1
NCHARTER
1i
pp
+1;01713
-7719 PALOMAR CHARTER
-' -" 9/D2/8L - -' --
-' -' - -'
-- - 4OJ.
07714
7770 PATTON SALES CORP
9 /02 /6l
95.
1 07715
7816 PRINTING SERV /REC MGMT
9/02/8L
252.
,07716
,T820 PRIDE COLOR PR755
9 102 /Bl
659.
07717
.. ...
7025 PROGRESS BULLE tt IN
___
"" - " -- 9/02/81 " -'� "-
-
-" ♦,
07718
8075 RAPID DATA INC
9 102 /BL
645.
07719
80955 REITppER DEVELOPMENT= A
H 9 /OZ /el
5 =638.
8297
2%81
35.
107721.
-" BER COUNTY
" - " -" 9%
- _ -- --
07723
9SANG
9N9ANOi(NO
SURVEYOR
129,
0311 SANE 00 SURVEYOR
9/02/81
..107724
8338 SEVEN DAY AUTO PARTS
9102/RL
14.
" OTT
05 8345 SHAM MR ROBERT
9102/81
"- " -- 500.
07726
8355 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9/02/61
8351
01727
8361 SAN DIEGO ROTARY $ROOM
9/02181
457.
pp 07728
IL
VOID VENDOR NO. 8390
9102181
07729 "' VOID VENDOR NO. 8390
_
9102/81
-
.07730 6396 SOUTHERN ALIF EDISR
9/02/61
3,486.
�07T31 8)a OUTHEPN ALIF GAS CO
9102181
133.
07732 ' 8175 $RAR KIETi
07713 8482 SPILL CONTROL SPLY C
9/02161
MF " " -" 9/02/81
- -
141.
243.
07734 8445 SPORTSMANS TROPHIES
9/02/81
L =193.
07735 8525 STATIONERS CORP
9102181
397.
07736 6946 UNITED COMPUTING SYSTEM
9/02/61
2T.
;07737':' 9020 CITY OF UPLAND
- " " -' - -" 9/02181 - "' --
-- -
-- - - --' -'- - 100.
IOT738 91135 VALLEY
SOUND
9/02/81
37.
jUT739 9148
102.
07)Al 9290 WESTEENDOUNITED
MA YON)..
.. 9%02%8!
."
07142 9380 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE
9 102 /el
160.
01743 9525 WILLIAMS PRINTING= 0
9102161
578.
O7T44 9989 XEROX CORP
' 07745 VOID FINAL TOTALS
9/02/81
9/02/61 -
921.
--
FINAL
TOTALS 136 =401.
... -- - - - - --
PAGE 2 if
r
Imo.
I
1 J
I �J
�1
u,
I�
( ORDINANCE NO. 150
1.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSO 'S PARCEL NUMBER
208- 061 -03 FROM A -1 (LIMITED AGRICULTURE) TO R- 2 -P.D.
(MULTI- FAMILY - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) AND GENERALLY LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND
BASE LINE.`QCAD,
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
% the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
Q
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's parcel number 208 - 061 -03, generally located
on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street
and Base Line, is hereby changed from A -1 to R- 2 -P.O.
SECTTOII 3: The PIayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
C7 ^rk shr.l! cau�i he same to be published within fifteen (15) days
nf'... p' :a -: at leas once in Th n,iily Rapr•t, a neap, er of
C•n +rli cir�:ali iun pill l,il4d in the City of ;ntario, California, and
c i rcc.i l a tee in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS _DAY OF
ORDINANCE NO. 1,5y
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
LAND USE AND BUILDING REGULATIONS AS ADOPTED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 17 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SPECIFICALLY ADDING SECTION 61.023(F) TO THE
ZONING CODE PROVIDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A
SPECIFIC PLAN.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
hereby ordains the following:
Section 61.023(F) of the Zoning Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
61.023(F) SPECIFIC PLAN: In any areas where a Specific Plan
_ has been adopted for said area as provided for in Section 65450 ET.SEQ.
of the Government Code of the State of California, to the extent where
they may be in conflict, such regulations contained within the Specific
Plan shall supersede those regulations contained within the Zoning
Districts within the Specific Plan boundary.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least
once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren .'1. 4lasseraan, City Clerk
1�
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
� •J
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 27, 1981
TO: City Council /City Manager
FROM: Harry J. Empey, Finance Direct
SUBJECT: Refuse Rate
The City has received requests from Yukon Disposal Service and Rancho Disposal
Service, Inc. for consideration of a rate increase. The request is based on
many factors of the rising costs that relate to operation. Primarily, the 332
increase in dump fees has led the way to this request for fee adjustments.
The rate increase of 102 requested by the refuse companies is well within the
rate increase allowed by the County, and would raise the maximum rate that could
be charged to $6.05 per month. In addition to the above-listed rate adjustment,
Yukon is requesting a rate differential of $1.25 per month over the old rate
for the area north of Banyan Street. This would make the new maximum rate
above Banyan $6.75 per month. Attached is a study that was conducted on behalf
of Yukon Disposal Service to determine how much more steep hillside residents
should be paying, as opposed to those living below Banyan. As you can see,
residents above Banyan should be paying 152 over whatever base rate is established.
Yukon is asking 122. This still means those living below Banyan will be sub-
sidizing those living above Banyan by 32.
The argument from this refuse company regarding collection service above Banyan
is that there are fewer pickups due to the size of the lots, and these large
lots have a tendency to generate more trash which causes more trips to the
dump for fewer pickups. Also, the dump is further away from the area above
Banyan than that below.
By comparison, this particular utility, although not a legal utility, still serves
the community in such a way as to reflect a utilitarian use. The cost to residents
at $6.05 per month would be $1.40 each time the trash was picked up. Rather
reasonable charge to have someone haul your garbage away. For those above
Banyan, at $6.75 per month, the charge would be $1.56 for each pickup. For an
individual to haul his /her own trash to the dump, the charge would be $3.00 plus
as. All on his /her valuable time.
On the other hand, when reflecting on the charges for refuse service made by other
cities, Rancho Cucamonga is hither. Our neighbors' rates range from a low of
$4.00 per month (Colton) to $5.50 per month (San Bernardino). However, it is
difficult to say that to operate in one city costs the same as in another.
Recommendation: Council should consider the data supplied. If there are any
questions Staff will be happy to supply answers. At the meeting of September 16,
1981 Council should decide if a rate adjustment should be made, and if so, how
much. At that time Council will amend our current Resolution No. 81 -15, which
sets refuse rates. The refuse companies have requested that any rate adjustment
be made effective October 1, 1981.
HJE:cam
RUCHO DISPOSAL
P.O. Box 958 ?' 'QUu27
Cucamonga, CA 91730 C� t4 OF
SERVICE, INC. Phona (714) 987.3717 COCAr40NCA /: `i
August 26, 1981
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 C Baseline Road
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman - City Manager
Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council:
Rancho Disposal makes application for an increase in the rate
of charge for the collection and disposal of solid waste from single
family dwelling units insi ^e the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On August 10, 1981, the County of San Bernardino increased
the disposal site fees 33.3% effective Immediately. It is
estimated this will require a f.12 (2.3 %) per month raise in the
residential rate merely to cover this added imposition to our costs.
We are requesting a further f.43 (7.7%) for the increase in our
operating costs effective October 1, 1981. This Will represent
a total increase of f.55 per month for both the residential and
senior citizen rate.
Please be advised, the County has approved a 10.54% raise to
the unincorporated valley areas to compensate the operators for the
added operating and landfill costs.
Attached is an analysis of costs and recommendations from our
accounting firm along with reports on selected costs.
The ownership and management of Rancho Disposal changed
hands on June 1, 1981. The fine reception accorded us has been
rewarding and is very much appreciated. We will continue to provide
the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga with the best service possible.
It Is our intention to mold a fine reputation, and we trust
your confidence in the company will build as well.
5t
(2)
Thank you for the consideration given to these proposals. We
will be pleased to submit any further information that the council
or staff may desire.
Sincerely,
RANCHO DISPOSAL, INC.
oal
Edward Burr
President
✓r�
AJ
RANCHO DISPOSAL, INC.
SELECTED OPERATING COST AND INDEX
COST
COMPONENT ITEM SOURCE
LABOR Salary - Average hourly earnings Payroll Records
FUEL Diesel fuel - cost per gallon Chevron USA Invoices
without sales tax
TRUCK Producer Price index (P.P.I.)
REPLACEMENT Motor Truck (Code 1411.02)
MAINTENANCE Consumer Price Index (C.P.I.)
(Unadjusted) U.S. City Average
All Urban Consumers Auto Parts
and Equiptment
CONTAINER P.P.I. Fabricated Structural
REPLACEMENT Products (Code 10 -7)
TIRES New Tires - Cost per average
Re-Cap Tires - Cost per average
1980 1981 CHANGE
6.00 6.50 8.3
.872 1.007 15.5
Producer Prices a Price 222.0 251.2
Indexes published monthly
by Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS)
Monthly Labor Review 125.4 133.2
(M.L.R.) Published
monthly by BLS
Monthly Labor Review
(M.L.R.)
Company Suppliers
Company Suppliers
SCHEDULE "a-
13.2
8.0
265.1 289.4 9.5
351.00 410.00 22.5
121.00 139.00 32.2
MARSHALL A. PETERS
AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
A616 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE 110
"NINA DEL REY, CALIFORNIA 90191
(111) 221-14M
August 26, 1981
Board of Directors
RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
Gentlemen:
MlMlfll
AMERICAN INSANE of
CIRl11U. IVRNC ACCWNIANTS
CAUMANIA SOCIIIY 01
C!R}INIO NIRL NGN1S
AUGm7 si >
CITY Or
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Pursuant to your instructions, we have compiled certain cost of doing
business for Rancho Disposal Service, Inc. Our study consisted of com-
paring certain operating expenses for 1981, as projected, with 1980
historical expenses.
Following is the comparison:
Actual Projected
1980 1981
Index Index
Salaries, excluding management salaries 18.2 22.3
Equipment operating expenses, primarily
fuel, lubricants G maintenance 14.1 13.1
Dumping fees
TOTALS
5.7 6.9
38.0 42.3
An analysis of the changes of the indexes is as follows:
1981 Projected 42.3
lg O 1?
Increase 4.3
lncrease of :.3 ooints ref'.cctvd as a porcentaee of 1920 38.0 points is
NOTE: The above indexes were computed by calculating the percentages of
the above operating expenses to revenues.
We recomIrend that you seek a rate adjustment of 11.37.
�'F
•• f
YUMN
,;Z6 Plsposw suplezze ft
P.O. Box 1 - Alb Loma, California 91701 • Telephone (714) 987.4410
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Re: Request for Refuse Rate Increase north of Banyon Street.
Dear Harry:
Yukon Disposal Service is requesting a rate increase effective as of
October 1st, 1981,for residential customers north of Banyon Street from
the present rate of $5.50 per month to $6.75 per month.
The basis for this price ($6.75) is the analysis our company had done in
December of 1980, which states that customers living between 19th Street
and Banyon Street should be paying 5% over the base rate. Residents north
of Banyon Street should be paying 15% over the base rate.
We are proposing an increase of approximately 12% over the base rate of
$6.05 per house for customers north of Banyon Street only.
Sincerely
(/'Joe Avakian
�6
AUG27 i 931 a
1717 OF
Mrno
VCAMQNGA
Board of Directors
RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
August 26, 1981
Page Two
Our study was based upon the financial data of the company's operating
statements and upon certain cost data furnished by management. Pro-
jected costs furnished by management were generally based upon the com-
pany's costs for the five months ended May 31, 1981, and adjusted for the
industry's recent experience of the effects of inflation.
Because this study is based partially upon the company's unaudited oper-
ating costs and have been projected to reflect inflationary increases,
so as to reflect future costs, we are not in a position to render an
Accountant's opinion on it, as promulgated by Rule 58 of the California
State Board of Accountancy.
Sincerely,
• S�'�. <a COQ a�
P-' . \ lx�-a
Marshall A. Peters
Certified Public Accountant
MAP:dk
3�5
7- -
I.
YUMN
tZ& DISPOS41 SFRY /CF
ft
P, O, 8ax 1 • Alm Loma, Cvlifamia 91701 • Telephone (/14) 987.2410
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Re: Request for Refuse Rate Increase.
Dear Harry:
Yukon Disposal Service is requesting a rate increase effective as of
October 1st,1981, of 55¢ per month (10X) from the present $5.50 per month
to $6.05 per month. The Senior Citizens rate would then go from $4.50 to
$5.05 per month.
As of August 10th, 1981, the County of San Bernardino increased their dump
fees from $2.25 per ton to $3.00 per ton, an increase of approximately 33%.
The dump fees are one of our major costs of operation. Also our employees are
due wage increases.
Enclosed are figures that you have requested, showing our increased operating
expenses.
Sincerely,
,/ oe Avakian
'yi J
AUG Z7 1931 ti
CITY OF
AA;IC'10 J
PUG2y 1901 �
CITY OF
RAMM
Yukon Disposal Service COCAh1O:1OA
Schedule of Operating Expenses
Percentage of Cost Increases 2q
CJ
Total Operating Expenses 20.55% 39.27% 15.52%
VICTOR FENSTER - CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT • AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
Actual
Projected
Projected
% Increase
Increase 1981
% Increase
1980 over
over 1979
1981 over
1979
1980
Advertising
51.14%
66.23%
9.99%
Amortization expense
3.03
3.03
-0-
Bad checks
58.26
69.31
6.99
Bank charges
(87.33)
(86.35)
7.80
Depreciation
16.20
17.38
1.01
Dues 6 subscriptions
8.86
16.57
7.08
Dump fees
15.11
53.09
33.00
Employee welfare
(45.38)
(41.36)
7.37
Equipment rental
56.60
68.34
7.50
Gas b oil - trucks
35.50
46.21
7.90
Insurance
31.47
41.59
7.70
Interest
180.83
463.83
7.00.78
Laundry - uniforms
22.55
31.49
7.30
Licenses
17.52
26.33
7.50
Miscellaneous
(62.97)
(60.34)
7.10
Office expense
( 6.66)
.30
7.40
Outside labor
113.80
130.26
7.70
Professional services
84.49
98.33
7.50
Rent
42.85
53.41
7.40
Repairs s mains. - equipment
28.91
38.59
7.50
Repairs 6 maint. - trucks
10.40
19.12
7.90
Salaries
6.65
17.32
10.00
Taxes - highway Use
( 5.52)
1.36
7.29
'faxes - Real Property
(67.49)
(65.13)
7.30
Taxes - payroll
( 7.04)
( .16)
7.40
Taxes - Peuonal Property
(71.74)
(69.70)
7.22
Ta lci,hono
23.70
32.75
7.31
[Jr :l it iv:;
50.5-1
6 1. 37
7.21
0uppIleu
236.9b
260.87
7.10
Freight
(:9.511
(24.591
6.97
Total Operating Expenses 20.55% 39.27% 15.52%
VICTOR FENSTER - CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT • AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
AN ANALYSIS OF
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION COST DIFFERENTIALS
WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Prepared £or-
YUKON DISPOSAL SERVICE
POST OFFICE,BOX NO.-1
'ALTA LOMA, CALIFORNIA 91701
December 10, 1980
rill
g auc�a Tsai � `-
CITY OF
5 - OA -lCHO
CUCQ0NG4 � • /
Prepared by
HEXIMIAN S ASSOCIATES
16162 BEACH BLVD., SUITE 202
HUdTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92647
YINON
( 1 F. O. Sox 1 • Alto Loma, Colilomio 91701 • Tolephono (714) 987 -2410
Honorable Mayor and Members December 9, 1980
of the City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Gentlemen:
At our request, the consulting firm Of Heximian & Associates of
Huntington Beach has completed the enclosed independent report
regarding the differential rates charged for residential refuse
collection in the City. Rekimian & Associates specializes in
performing analytical studies of solid waste management and
principals of the firm have directed many major studies including
the Solid Waste Management Master Plan for San Bernardino County,
and the Solid Waste Management Master Plan for_Riverside county.
Based on a ore -week survey of waste loadings, the consultant found
that the Tuesday route (the northermost area of the City) generated
about 205 more refuse per home than the average. Likewise, the Friday
route (the older section of the City) generated about 205 less refuse
per home than the average. Also, the Tuesday route covered 4 square
miles and collected from 1216 homes whereas the Friday route covered
only 1 square mile and collected from 1548 homes.
( Based upon these inequities in services verses the costs of services
rendered, the consultants concluded that if the City wishes to impose
one flat rate for all residents, then those persons living in the
higher density areas (closer to Base Line Road) would essentially be
subsidizing those persons living in the very low density areas (near
the northern boundary of the City) . However, if the City Wishes that
i the rate reflect the cost of service, the residents living between
13th Street and Banyan Street should pay about 5 percent more than
those living between Base Line Road and 19th Street, Also, the resi-
dents living in the area north of Banyan Street should pay about 15
per-ant more than those living between Base Line Road and 19th Street.
L Our Comoanv's costs of equipment maintenance and repair and of fuel
usage tend to verify the consultants findings and conclusions. However,
rather than develop a three -tier rate structure, we have always main-
tained a two -tier structure: one for between Base Line Road and 19th
Street, and one for the area north of 19th Street.
We hope that this information will be helpful to you in your deliber-
ations. If we may be of any further assistance to you, please call
upon us.
Very truly yours,
4-
oseoh Avakian
C
AN ANALYSIS OF
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION COST DIFFERENTI.aIS
( WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
-(
Prepared for
( YUKON DISPOSAL SERVICE
POST OFFICE.SOX NO.'1
ALTA LOMA, CALIFORNIA 91701
December 10, 1980
C
Prepared by
HEM il:i A:I S A530CIATES
C
16162 BEACH BLVD., SUITE 202
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92647
7
C
C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
page
1.0
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 1
2.0
DESCRIPTION OF COLLECTION AND
DISPOSAL OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 1
3.0
EFFECTS OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY DENSITY
(
ON COLLECTION COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 5
4.0
EFFECTS OF GRADE ON FUEL CONSUMPTION . . . . .
. . . 11
5.0
EFFECT OF REFUSE GENERATION PER HOUSEHOLD
ON COLLECTION COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 13
C
6.0
DISTANCE TO LANDFILL AFFECTS COLLECTION
COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 14
7.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . .
. . . 14
C8.0
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 17
3
3
7
i
R
C
C
C
I
C
ii
�; 3
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure
1
Number and Distribution of
2
Residential Collections . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
2
Residential Collections Area
3
C
3
Collection Service Areas and
4
Disposal Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
4
General Plan for Collection Area
. 7
. 9
5
Typical Density. . . . . . . . . • • • •
• • •
. . 10
5
Photographs.
7
Haven Avenue Cross Section
. 12
8
Distance to Sanitary Landfill
. . 15
C'
Along Streets. . . . . . . . . • • • . •
C
C
I
C
ii
�; 3
C
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This analysis has been prepared for Yukon Disposal Service
to document the cost differential between those residential
accounts located between Base Line Road and 19th Street and
C those north of 19th Street. Those topics investigated to
support the contention that different rates are valid and
appropriate include: (1) the density of residential, develop-
( ment, (2) the gradient or slope of streets, (3) the
pounds of wastes generated per household, and (4) the dis-
tance to the disposal site location.
C
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
OPERATIOOS
Yukon Disposal Service provides residential refuse collec-
tion to about 7200 customers within an 11 square mile area
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The service area is
bounded on the south by Base Line Road and on the north,
east and west by the City boundaries. Collection is con-
ducted for each residence once a week on a Monday through
Friday schedule. Yukon operates three trucks daily within
each day's territory. (Refer to Figures 1 and 2) The
disposal site, Milliken Sanitary Landfill, is located 0 -10
miles south (about one hour roundtrip) of the collection ..
C area at the intersection of Mission Boulevard and Milliken
Avenue. (Refer to Figure 3) Collection is conducted by
three two -man crews and rear loading refuse vehicles.
1.
-1-
� � �T
BEKIMIAN& ASSOCIATES
lQV[ULTINL[Nfi1NLL)[AN4 LVVIM 4NM[N 1. \L ILA NM [IL{ I)•
CITY :3=jn RY
422
I 397 Tuesday
Ib
(1216)
Igo
397
Total Colle,
v tions
N
7194
M
�O
Y
�
m
390
422
r$
u
I
o
Ban
an Street
Wednesday
(1373)
561
133
587
I 345
562
v
�'.
Thursday
I
a
(1627)
I
406
0
'
B
G7
19th Street
o
H
495
445
I
608
Monday
553
a
(1430)
471
Fx
(154
(1598)
I
Figure 1
Base
Line Road
Number
and Distribution of
Residential Collections
BEKIMIAN& ASSOCIATES
lQV[ULTINL[Nfi1NLL)[AN4 LVVIM 4NM[N 1. \L ILA NM [IL{ I)•
i
.lam
lc�
r ON ^
.+m+m enn • ASSOCIATES
wrouxnr�c weixeix+:xu +n menrn+vuxv[xe If Figure E
Residential Collections Area
r:
17 Disposal Site
_ -- z",Zz- - LEGEND
COUNTY DISPOSAL SITE
A — CITY DISPOSAL SITE
IIEKIMIAN i ASSOCIATES
II.
CYNY�tl1.V�: Lx�INxlY] ANY LNVIx��NMLNIAI Y1.YNN1.N]
':�.001G: LEG
COLLECTION SERVICE AREAS
AND DISPOSAL SITES
SAN DERNAROINO COUNTY
SW7I.WBy PORTIC"
Figure 3
X.
C
The collection area consists of rapidly developing properties
north of Base Line Road within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C
The area is located on a thick alluvial plain that dips to
the south. Existing development is proceeding in accordance
C with the City's General Plan which designates properties
generally north of Banyan Street as very low density (2
units per acre) and low and low medium density south of
Banyan Street and north of Base Line Road.
Much of the analysis in this report is based on the land use
designations (and density) contained in the City's General
Plan.
3.0 EFFECTS OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ON
COLLECTION COSTS
According to the Environmental Protection Agency the "On-
Route collection minutes per service is one of the parameters
directly related to the productivity of collection oper-
C ations. "' Put another way, the more houses that are serviced
per day, the lower the unit cost per house. The number of
houses collected from per day is directly related to the
C
number of houses per unit area (i.e., density).
The more homes that are serviced per day the lower the cost
l per house. This means that if a refuse hauler can collect
100 homes in the same time it takes to collect 90 homes the
C
cost to the 100 homes could be 10 percent less.
'EPA /530/SW -97c. /March 1975, p. 82.
lr / Q
ri
At Yukon Disposal Service the cost to operate the required
vehicles including labor and overhead is generally the same
for each day of the week (except for fuel which is discussed
in the next section of this report). However, the number of
C households serviced each day varies greatly. The Tuesday
and Wednesday routes located north of Banyan Street average
about 1300 homes per day while the areas souti of the Banyan
Street (Monday, Thursday and Friday) average 1500 homes per
day.
Using the rule of density, the areas of 1300 homes per day
should pay about 13 percent more for disposal service than the
1500 homes per day areas.
l
A more detailed inspection reveals that the difference in the
number of collections between Tuesday (the least dense
properties of the collection area) and Friday (the most dense)
C
is about 21 percent. It should be noted that there is a close
correlation between the number of households serviced per
day and the land use designations of the General Plan. (Refer
t
to ? ;ure 4) The reason for this correlation is that the
General Plan specz___.> the levels of density that are per-
.. mitt -_. T as_ .._.sit, lim_c_..ions are reflected in the actual
lot layouts of the respective subdivisions as illustrated
in Figure 5 and shown in Figure 6.
C
� GI
-6-
C
C
c
L
.c
l
I :
Js: +•�i�i _: .. I _: F:
Very.- Low. Dez�ity
,/1
.....
I.+ . _ a i
•• .i•:il ., � GAR ��C.•• .,. •, �' :1 '''•••'I 19th .\N
Bas? Linn,
HEKIMIAN A ASSOCIATES I Figure 4
U
CONSCnvc"INOtu orwx
eea Nmnrtni ru.vHCAS II General Plan for Collection
Area
-7- 70
c ( }(}jj
... : .............. ............. ....... .
—7 .
_
4L j
r:• r • :...::
:.:..::::J.:.:::i'r:::.
19th ° -_. _ •�:.�. - .rr..le rw -vr wr- Is.•'�.?
3ase Line
Vii' Iv`i::4.•:a• ::::::�I:Cj:��-c- '•`,''`?� ''J
HEKIMIAN s ASSOCUTES !
` CONSORL 4GEMINEEASA.40[NNRONMEWALPLN4GS II
Figure 4
General Plan for Collection Area
'�7/ (Continued)
-P- /.
C
�I
C
c
C
L
C
Typical very low density less
than 2 dwelling units per
acre with generally 100 feet
by 200 feet lots.
Typical low density with 2 to 4
dwelling units per acre with
generally 80 feet by 150 feet lots.
Typical low- medium density with
5 to 8 dwe_1— iits per acre
with generally 70 feet by 100 feet
lots.
HEKIWAN R ASSOCIATES
L CONSULtIN4"I"IRS NND SNMONM[N1.IL 1 NN[S! II•
`�7 � Figure 5
7
3
7
C
C
3
9
TYPICAL LOW - MEDIUM DENSITY
TYPICAL VERY LOW DENSITY
Figure 6
PHOTOGRAPHS
-10- /
A
( 4.0 EFFECTS OF GRADE ON FUEL CONSUMPTION
When a half.-loaded refuse vehicle travels on level ground
it requires very little power to accelerate and very little
braking to decelerate. When the same half - loaded vehicle
travels up and down a slope the engine and braking require-
ments increase substantially. This is an indisputable law
( of physics. As an example: this law is particularly notice-
able when hiking on flat ground versus hiking up and down a
hill. The muscles of the hiker immediately tire both going
( up a hill and when coming down a hill. The muscles also
require additional energy to function. When this law of
physics is applied to the Rancho Cucamonga refuse hauling
C situation, the fuel differential between the area north of
19th Street and the area south of 19th Street is about 29
percent. Yukon Disposal has found that fuel consumption
< on a daily basis is about 101 gallons per day for the less
densely populated, steeper areas of the community north of
19th street and about 72 gallons per day for the higher
C density flatter areas south of 19th Street. The general
slope of north -south streets is 2.8 percent for the area
south of 19th Street and 7.2 percent for the area north of
< 19th Street (Refer to Figure 7).
Fuel consumption also reflects the distances to the disposal
area discussed in Section 6.0 of this report.
� n n OA n
2200' City Boundary
l
� E1. 2300'
2000'.
1800'
N
� ) Wilson Avenue
1 E1. 1820'
J APr
PP�F
1600' P1
PAP
n n 0% n
Figure
Haven Avenue Cross Section
from North City Boundary to
Base Line Road
19th Street
1900 E1. 1930'
2.8 percent
slope
Base Line
Road E1. \13 5'
0' 9000' 8000' 1 ,000' 16,000'
C
L The Veri Low Density areas of the General Plan (Tuesday and
Wednesday) average 69.9 pounds per week. The Thursday area
C
5.0 EFFECT OF REFUSE GENERATION PER
HOUSEHOLD ON COLLECTION COSTS
C
The more refuse that Yukon Disposal
Service collects per
household the higher the per unit cost. Stated another way,
it would take a refuse hauler 10 percent more effort to load
i
and haul 1000 pounds of municipal refuse rather than to
load and haul 900 pounds of refuse.
(
The results of a one -week survey of
waste loadings indicates
the following pounds per household:
Number of Number of
Pounds per Area
(
Days Homes Tons
Home (sq. mi.)
Monday 1430 45.3
63.3 3.1
Tuesday 1216 46.1
75.8 4.4
Wednesday 1373 44.0
64.1 2.6
Thursday 1627 50.6
62.2 1.3
Friday 1548 38.6
49.9 1.1
4L
Total 7194 224.6
(Ave)63.1 12.5
The pounds per household reflects
a sharp difference be-
tween the 75.8 pounds per home in the
Tuesday route (Very
Low Density northern area of the General.
Plan)and the 49.9
pounds per home in the Friday route
(Low and Low - Medium '
Density). The Tuesda? route is 17
percent greater than the
average and the Friday routa is 20
percent lower than the
average.
L The Veri Low Density areas of the General Plan (Tuesday and
Wednesday) average 69.9 pounds per week. The Thursday area
C
(Low Density) averages 62.2 pounds per week and the Low-
( Medium Density areas (Monday and Friday) averages 56.6
pounds per week.
The Very Low and Low Density areas of the General Plan are
19 and 11 percent greater respectively than the Low - Medium
Density.
C 6.0 DISTANCE TO THE LA14DFILL
AFFECTS COLLECTION COSTS
The further a hauler has to drive to the landfill site from
the collection area the higher the cost. If one area is 9
miles from the landfill and the other area is 10 miles from
the landfill the cost to the 9 mile area would be 10 percent
less.
In the case of Rancho Cucamonga the landfill is located 9.25
miles on the average from the collection area north of
Banyan Street, 8.5 miles from the area between 19th and
Banyan Streets and 8.0 miles from the area between 19th
Street and Base Line Road (Refer to Figure 8). The further
distances are 6 and 13 percent greater respectively than
the 8 miles from the landfill.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECO2NNENDATIONS
The items that are primarily responsible for differences
in the actual cost of service in Rancho Cucamonga are resi-
L dential density, refuse generation, distance to the
t
Distance to Sanitary Landfill
Along Streets
ON
C
sanitary landfill and the scope or grade of streets. The
If the objective of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is to
C maintain a fixed flat rate for the entire city, then the
higher density areas of the community will be subsidizing
the lower density areas of the community. If, however, the
C City of Rancho Cucamonga desires that rates more accurately
reflect the actual costs for collection, then the City
should seriously consider a three price system which
reflects density, slope, refuse generation and distance
to the disposal site. The low density area should be about
5 percent higher and the very low density should be 15
C percent higher.
L ,
actual differences can be summarized
in percentages as
follows for each area.
Base Line
19th
to 19th
North
Density 1008
1138
Grade 1008
1298'
Base Line 19th to
Banyan
to 19th Banyan
North
•
Generation 1008 1118
1198
•
Distance 1008 1068
1138
Based upon the cost differentials presented
above it would
seem reasonable to charge 5 percent more than the base rate
for the area between 19th Street and
Banyon Street and
15 percent more for the area north of
Banyan Street.
If the objective of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is to
C maintain a fixed flat rate for the entire city, then the
higher density areas of the community will be subsidizing
the lower density areas of the community. If, however, the
C City of Rancho Cucamonga desires that rates more accurately
reflect the actual costs for collection, then the City
should seriously consider a three price system which
reflects density, slope, refuse generation and distance
to the disposal site. The low density area should be about
5 percent higher and the very low density should be 15
C percent higher.
L ,
C
8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
C
1. Savas, E.S., The Organization and Efficiency of Solid
Waste Collection, 1977
2. Environmental Protection Agency, Residential Collection
Systems. Volume 1 Report Summary (S.W. - 97c.1),
March, 1975.
3. Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, Street Map and
Guide, Rancho Cucamonga, 1979.
4. Hekimian & Associates, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal,
Management Evaluation, prepared for Independent Disposal
Service and County of Sacramento, April 29, 1980.
5. American Public Works Association, Refuse Collection
Practice, 1966.
C
C
l
C
L 1
Cv
-17-