HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/09/16 - Agenda PacketCCCn.N0,1.
CITY OF
RAN iO CL)CANKI C',A
o ' CITY ��7TC,�OUN(,'IL
1977 Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
September 16, 1981
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead-
line for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on rhur;day prior to the first and
third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Flag Salute,
B. Roll Call: Frost, Mikels_�, , Palombo_�, Bridge, and Schlosser.
C. Approval of Minutes: August 19, 1981
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
A. Advisory Commission - September 24, 7:00 p.m. -- Lion's Park Community
Center.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -9 -16 for S411,226.46. 1
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Bruce N. 3
Eskenazi, Grape Vision Co., 10297 Ironwood Court, for a
wine broker's license.
c. Acceptance of Map, Improvement Security and Improvement
Agreement for Parcel Map 6125, Located on the south side
of Lemon, east of Archibald.
4
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -138 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
AND FINAL MAP OF PARCEL MAP 6125,
City Council Agenda -2- September 16, 1981
e. Minority Business Enterprise Policy and Program. It is 11
recommended that Council approve the resolution establishing
a Minority Business Enterprise Policy and Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -139 13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY AND PRO-
GRAM.
f. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. 34
Parcel Map 5760 - located on Pittsburgh Avenue, north
of 6th Street. Owner: O'Donnell, Brigham 8 Partners.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $446,500.00
Parcel Map 5157 - located at the northwest corner of 4th
and Haven Avenue. Owner: John D. Lusk 8 Son.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $253,000.00
IsRESOLUTION NO. 81 -140 35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAPS NOS. 5760
AND 5157 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
g. Request authorization to close Base Line Road on November 38
14, 1981, between Carnelian and Archibald from the hours
of 8:00 a.m. until the conclusion of the Third Annual
Founders Day Parade. (The parade is scheduled to conclude
at approximately noon).
This particular request is not without precedence. Base
Lire Road has been closed in the past for conducting Founders
Day Parade. Store owners and home owners will be notified
by mail and by personal contact.
h. Request authorization to initiate proceedings with Caltrans 39
for the closure of a section of Foothill Boulevard on
November 13, 1982 for the purpose of conducting the Fourth
Annual Founders Day Parade.
.<1 i. SCAG 1982 Population and Employment Projections. It is 40
recommended that Council accept the estimated population
and employment growth forecast prepared by the William C.
Lawrence Company for inclusion in SCAG -82 ".
City Council Agenda -3- September 16, 1981
i
j. Set October 7, 1981 for public hearing for: Environmental
Assessment and Zone Change No. 81 -02 - Lewis: A proposed
change of zone from R -1 (single family residential) to
R -1- 20,000 (single family residential - 20,000 sq. ft. lot
minimum) on 52 acres of land located on the south side of
Summit Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues - APN 225-
181-04 through 09, 26, and 43.
k. Set October 7, 1981 for public hearing for: Environmental
Assessment and Zone Change No. 81 -03 - Daon Corporation:
A proposed change of zone from M -2 (general manufacturing)
to C -2 (general business /commercial) on 18 acres of land
located on the northeast corner of Arrow and Haven - APN
208 - 622 -01.
1. Set October 7, 1981 for public hearing for: Environmental
Assessment and Planned Development No. 80 -04 - (TT 11614)
The Development Group: A total planned development of 80
single family attached units on 10.1 acres of land in the
R -1 and R -1 -5 acre zones generally located on the west side
of Ramona at Monte Vista Avenue - APN 202- 181 -5, 6, and 16.
m. Set October 7, 1981 for public hearing for: Appeal of _
Planning Commission's decision -- Woodland Pacific Develop-
ment, Inc,: Tract No. 11933 located on both sides of
Hermosa, north of Hillside.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. ANNEXATION N0. 4 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 42
FOR TRACTS 10569 AND 9584 -1 - DEER CREEK AND WILLIAM
LYON.
Recommendation: It 1s recommended that Council approve
Resolution No. 81 -141 ordering the annexation of Tracts
10569 and 9484 -1 to the Landscape Maintenance District
No, 1,
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -141 _ 43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 4
TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1
FOR TRACTS NO. 10569 AND 9584 -1.
•
City Council Agenda -4- September
B. A REQUEST FROM REFUSE COMPANIES FOR CONSIDERATION OF A
16, 1981
48
RATE INCREASE.
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve
a 10% rate increase and that a differential rate of
56.75 per month for areas north of Banyan and west of
Milliken be set.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -142
49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
REFUSE COLLECTION RATES WHICH MAY BE CHARGED
FOR REFUSE COLLECTION FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
C. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE RETIREMENT PRO-
50
GRAM PERS .
Recommendation: To set October 7, 1981 for second reading
.
and adoption.
_
ORDINANCE NO. 155 (first reading)
51
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF
-.
THE CA 170nNrn "C"' :MP LOVE'S' nE +InL12NT
SYSTEM.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
7. ADJOURNMENT.
Meeting to adjourn to a special meeting with the Fire District
Board on September 22, 1981 at 7:00 p.m. - Lion's Park Community
Center.
.q
Y
1. CALL w
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, September
16, 1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor pro tem Arthur H.
Bridge.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Arthur A. Palombo, and Mayor
pro tem Arthur H. Bridge.
Also present were: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager /City Clerk; Robert Dougherty,
Assistant City Attorney; Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager; Jack Lam, Community
Development Director; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Harry Empey, Finance Director;
Bill Holley, Community Services Director.
Absent: Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who was out on town on business.
Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve
the August 19, 1981 minutes. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Councilman Frost announced that on Tuesday, October 6 at 7:00 p.m. there
would be a general town meeting in Etiwanda to discuss the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
b. On Wednesday, October 7, 8:30 a.m. there would be a Flood Control Zone I
meeting.
C. Friday, September 18, at 9:30 a.m. there would be an Ontario Ground Access
Committee meeting.
d. Mr. Wasserman requested that the meeting adjourn to Tuesday, September 22,
for a joint meeting with the Foothill Fire District Board of Directors.
e. Mayor pro tem Bridge requested an executive session following the meeting to
discuss pending litigation.
f. Mr. Bridge gave a summary report from a Rotary meeting held on September 15
at which Ernest Hahn was the speaker. The Hahn Company will be the developer
of the proposed regional shonning center in Rancho Cucamonga. An encouraging
report was presented that the shopping center would be developed and that
agreements had been signed with two of the major tenants, May Company and Broad-
way.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -9 -16 for $411,226.46.
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Bruce N. Eskenazi, Grape Vision
Company, 10297 Ironweed Court, for a wine broker's license.
c. Acceptance of Map, Improvement Security, and Imnrovement Agreement for Parcel
Map 6125. Located on the south side of Lemon, east of Archibald.
AND FI4AL MAP OF PARCEL MAP 6125.
e. Minority Business Enterprise Policy and Program. It is recommended that
Council approve the resolution establishing a Minority Business Enterprise
Policy and Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY AND PROGRAM.
f. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion.
Parcel Map 5760 - located on Pittsburgh Avenue, north of 6th Street.
Owner: O'Donnell, Brigham d Partners.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $446,500.00
Parcel Map 5157 - located at the northwest corner of 4th and Haven Avenue.
Owner: John D. Lusk S Son.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $253,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -140
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAPS NOS. 5760
AND 5157 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
g. Request authorization to close Base Line Road on November 14, 1981, between
Carnelian and Archibald from the hours of 8:00 a.m. until the conclusion of
the Third Annual Founders Day Parade. (The parade is scheduled to conclude
at approximately noon).
This particular request is not without precedence. Base Line Road has been
closed in the past for conducting Founders Day Parades. Store owners and home
owners wil: ie notified by mail and by personal contact.
h. Request authorization to initiate proceedings with Caltrans for the closure
of a section of Foothill Boulevard on November 13, 1982 for the purpose of
conducting the Fourth Annual Founders Day Parade.
i. SCAG 1982 Population and Employment Projections. It is recommended that
Council accept the estimated population and employment growth forecast
prepared by the William C. Lawrence Company for inclusion in "SCAG -82 ".
J. get October 7, 1981 for public hearing for: Environmental Assessment and
Zone Change No. 81 -02 - Lewis: A proposed change of zone from R -1 (single
family residential) to R -1- 20,000 (single family residential - 20,000 sq. ft.
lot minimum) on 52 acres of land located on the south side of Summit Avenue
between Etiwanda and East Avenues - APN 225- 181 -04 through 09, 26, and 43.
k. Set October 7, 1981 for public hearing for: Environmental Assessment and
Zone Change No. 81 -03 - Daon Corporation: A proposed change of zone from
M -2 (general manufacturing) to C -2 (general business /commercial) on 18 acres
of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow and Haven - APN 208 - 622 -01.
Monte Vista Avenue - APN 202 - 181 -5, 6, and 16.
m. Set. October 7, 1981 for public hearing for: Appeal of Planning Commission's
decision -- Woodland Pacific Development, Inc.: Tract No. 11933 located on
both sides of Hermosa, north of Hillside.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar as
presented. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent).
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
4A. A.NNEKATION NO. 4 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACTS 10569
AND 9585 -1 - DEER CREEK AND WILLIAM LYON COMPANY.
Mayor pro tem Bridge opened the meeting for public hearing.
Addressing Council was Tony Zenz, representative for Deer Creek. He requested that
the Deer Creek item be separated from the William Lyon district in Council's con-
sideration. He said Deer Creek protested this since they would not receive benefit
from the tax. Thev had a homeowners association which took care of the horse trails
and the parkways. He also stated that they had not received notice of this meeting
but happened to see the postings.
There being no further public response, Mayor pro tem Bridge closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Hubbs explained there was a portion along Haven Avenue which would be covered
by the maintenance district. He said that maintenance district monies were intended
for areas such as this which were behind block walls.
Mr. Wasserman said that since there was a question on the notification, then we
should continue this for two weeks in order to clarify this and to renotice if
necessary.
Mr. Zenz asked for a definition of where monies have been spent for the systems
development fees, beautification fees, and maintenance districts funds.
Mr. Wasserman suggested that staff sit down with Mr. Grigsby and Mr. Zenz of Deer
Creek and go over these things with them.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to continue the discussion of this
item on October 7 in order to check on the notification for public hearing. Motion
carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, and Bridge. NOES:
None. ABSENT: Schlosser.
4B. A REOCF,ST FROM REFUSE COMPANIES FOR CONSIDER.iTION OF A RATE INCREASE. Mr.
Empey presented the staff report and then turned the meeting over to representatives
of the refuse companies.
Mr. Burr, owner of Rancho Disposal, stated that he would answer anv nuestions of
the Council.
Councilman Mikels asked what was the percentage formula used for the increase above
Banyan. Mr. Burr stated that the areas north of Banyan is very difficult to serve,
but he would have to turn this over to a Yukon representative to answer since it
was included in their report.
Joe Avakian, owner of Yukon, said the formula used showed the area north of
Banyan would be 157, higher to service because of the terrain, etc. He said they
that one fee be established throughout the entire city
Mr. Avakian stated there were many cities which had varying terrains such as Redlands
and Yucaipa with differing rate schedules.
Mr. Bauers, 8357 Valle Vista. He expressed there should be an iudependc ^t audit
done before council accepts the fees proposed by the companies. He said 'e fees
charged by the city of Colton are about 33% lower then Rancho Cucamonga. .x said
such items as fuel have stablized in the oast year. Also, the city of Ont.rio
operates a truck with one man while in Rancho Cucamonga three men are assi ^ned to
each truck. He opposed the difference in rates north of Banyan. He suggested
that a task force be established to explore new and better ways of providing
trash service in the future. Perhaps a modest increase of approximately 5% should
be granted now until such a study is completed.
Bill Ungles, 6375 Sapphire. He concurred with Mr. Bauers in having an independent
study done.
Steve Marleau felt the fee difference north of Banyan was not justified. He realized
the dump fees had gone up, but not that much.
Mr. Burr, Rancho Disposal, stated it has been 18 months since an increase had
been granted, and gas alone is approximately 25% higher today. He said the city
of Colton's fees were lower because it was operated by the city and was subsidized.
Mr. Empey stated that the formula used in figuring the increases was one worked out
and approved by the County.
There being no further response from the public, Mayor pro Gem Bridge closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Mikels asked if the formula includes a decreasing factor for new
households within the jurisdiction. Mr. Empey said he did not have the formula
before him; it was in his file at city hall.
Council concurred that they should take a recess while Mr. Empey went back to
city hall to get his file. Mayor pro tem Bridge called a recess at 8:00 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 8:35 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present.
Mr. Empty went over the formula as established by the County which showed certain
cost factors as related to the refuse industry. He stated that this formula did
include the decreasing factor for new households.
Mayor pro ten Bridge reopened the meeting for public hearing.
Charlene Johnson, Red Hill, asked questions about the routes in Red Hill.
Mr. Marleau stated that he wasn't against the rate increase, but against the
rate differences.
There being no further public comments, the public hearing was declared closed.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to adopt Resolution No. 81 -142, thus
granting the race increase. Motion carried unanimously by the following vote:
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, and Bridge. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser.
City Clerk Wasserman read Resolution No. 81 -142 in full.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REFUSE
COLLECTION RATES WHICH MAY BE CHARGED FOR REFUSE
COLLECTION FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
ORDINANCE NO. 155 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 155. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent).
Mayor pro tem Bridge opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Mayor pro tem Bridge set October 7 for second reading.
5. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS. There were none.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
7. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn to an Executive Session
not to reconvene this evening, but to reconvene on September 22, 1981 at 7:00 a.m.
for a special meeting with the Foothill Fire District Board of Directors to meet
In the Lion's Park Community Center. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser
absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deouty City Clerk
RIL.7 CITY Cr RAI.Om Cl)r APf`i9A WARRANT RFCOIICILIATICN
w WARR F
YEN
Y V E N 0 0 R N A M E
WARN JOURNAL
DATE RIftFLNCE
01373
7487
Pi1I1Llr Fill VC 1Al PUBL
9 /20 /flL
w 01474
4175
FPTK I. ;APES
N /25 /I
013IS
DIZ5
ALI 111 IRAVFI AM LCY
tl/1 `+J fll
01176
2039
CALIFI'Rt IA 0r-TA1 "RV1
7176 /NI
01377
4900
It !Li FY, MLI C A3 t
P /]1701
w 11140
722.1
VATrl,AY, KA4tN C
8 1:6 1AL
01179
'395
Cr:IROV CARI
P /I, /nl
111 3d
4200
RANK :.j AYEPICA
P127 /il
01391
H3Il
SAN 11.1 CY f 411 NY C
PflI /RI
e•. It 3L?
1305
111P,Yll19T Of Vi P -.T 13FP
e/? i /bl
O1 '93
41sn
GI TN':')LF ff'L`I:LL %AV ING
A /7" /01
017184
7805
R:ST'!1STi6
9 /N /91
liles
4640
-1 FA Sr ;. 110E ail(
9 /a ? /YL
r .113X6
7905
POBLIL fMP REf llitYChT S
9/x17 /AI
01107
ISRU
RI OF CPI.SS
9/3?fnt
01181
1.559
K�ISED FOONDAI IO ^1 HIM I
9 /] ? /b1
013,`9
2105
CASALETTIS Put KA PAIACE
9/02/111
.• 01340
6175
Cr 3GIJF IF If
013 )1
4-)0
LFSI I UNIT H) LIY
9110 ? /El
e. 01149
vein
+^S ALIG':Ml NI
9/17/81
IC MS ALIGN - f:F
9/17181
w 07749
V1: ill
FI]P,S ALIGN °!NT
9/17 /1.1
117750
VOIH
RIR:iS ALIGN -IFNT
9t17/91
DIM
1009
ACT AUTO CLFCT2IC
9/17131
IIIS?
003?
A L R II::E S ..'JICE
9117/8L
OfT53
0195
r.ILBENI AJA A ASSIC.
1/t7 /8l
GIT54
DLJS
AIT4 FILE FOVIP Q!
9/17181
91`755
0315
A +- RICA': 1GCK f. S`J ^PLY
9117/91
07156
04 70
APNO, PURSFRY Ihr
9/1 r/91
w 01757
04-19
ASPA /4GNA PEG MILE
9/14/:11
1111159
I101I
BACF.LINE HARI]MA4C
9/17/81
07759
1330
RECKLEY -CAROY CO
9 /l7 /01
O776D
292D
CA Cf.UNC❑ OF CIVIL ENO
5 /17191
01761
2 100
CITRUS M'ITORS
S /17 /8l
OIIA?
2315
C.CA E LA I!9TT11 "1: FIi
'11r1HI
9 nc1
111
; -i I V11 .°1^
(I'I T.; rL r
7/ 17151
07764
2440
CG EiF SAN RD,: FL „tl:• C7
9/17/31
.. 07765
24511
CO SAN BENNAHDIIA! SHFk1
9 /l1` / -1
0776M1
2471
H D CGVcy IRC
9 /li /el
0711,7
?SGO
C'IVI \GTP.N C I:90YC
9 /1T /PL
0176-
760.1
GPC.RN PFINTFPS
)/11/91
.. 0171.9
7511
U'C AM';NhA Cu 'A )TER 01ST
S /17 /91
Of Nil
21110
IIF ICO
9/17/81
:17171
299H
0lR JIIRFS IPYI.1
9 /17 /NI
01771
14,1.1
rMPFY. IIAPRY J
9/111101
.. 0f.'f1
44`tO
G-%FHAI TELEP-II:NE CO
9/17/91
07174
477 +
Gk ANT. JERRY .1
9/171,31
- 07T7,
49:30
HlL1EY. WILLII:1 l
9/17181
CHI.
4991
wilt Y W!: - PrTTY CASH
9 /(f /Al
r 11717!
411
11,11M) POCK r11 INC
9 /17 /9l
0777+
4447
f31INEA5 FkFE SUROSRy
9/17/01
Of?"
4195
HUQDS1 ILGYD
9 /1'f /BI
01790
511.
1944E
9117/81
07"1
5310
I S A CFFICE
9 /11` /81
07TH?
6160
JI.MS E1KCl1 SERVILE
9/L7/91
O 1781
6630
1AA JACK
9 /IT /Ill
07784
1.140
LAIRD CPNS7RUCTIN1; CO
0/17181
.� 0!185
6191
LINVILLF -SAN )EPSON -HORN
9/17101
0!786
7375
:V NAIIAYI CLAUDIA
9117181
07781
7410
VIDN FIN 1.TFICIeS ASSCC
/L7 /RI
07788
7135
PARKER. MACH /NIN'3
9 /17/81
0770,
7020
PRIDE CPLOR PIFSS
9/17/81
07790
7825
PROGRESS RUILFTIN
9 /17 /9l
Ofi91
70:4
PI1OGRFSSIVF APCIIITECTIIR
9117/nl
0779'
OLIO
PFSF IRCH INS, LF ANEitIC
9!17!01
97093
8171
NFYNCLL191 JANICE
9/17181
01794
(1150
PITT CAAFRA CChTEN
9/17/81
07795
8161
kIMSIO1 FEAE.E CJ
9/17/81
3779n
ej00
R "fIrNSCNI .7AMFS H
9/17/81
n 07797
...27
SCHZA4M. C WALTER CONTR
9/17/91
0779+
808)
$lIR T5gi1 >1. A191rL
^/17/91
07 I9'I
VLIO
Vf NPOR N0. 8140
9111/81
OfH00
9390
S!nUTHEPN CALIF EOISON
9/L7/81
07801
8195
S(,UTOFRN CALIF GAS CG
9/17/31
9/17/81
UISCOUNT
NET
15.00
1511.00
.78
3.34444.
48.00 00
11.47
11.37
91459.30
21699.50
1. ?94.29
1 5011 nu
tG. 00
In, 152.71
41825.00
21684.00
39.59
150.00
6.00
11
is
1001
1861
31
41300.09
200.00
301333.14
11774.40
1,983.49 Z
PACT
0
R967 CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AM
WA RR / Y E N 0 0 R N A M E
07802 8796 SO CA LANDSCAPE MOT
07A01 0410 SUU INMFST CDNCRETE PROD
07R0i 8§42 SPILL CONTIMC SPLY C ME
BTR05 8525 STATIONERS CDRP
07806 0544 SUPERINTPNDENT DPCUY.ENT
07BOT 8560 SYSTEMS FURNITURE CO
07908 8675 TEXACO INC
OTBR9 .... .. 1 I
01010 9023 UPLAND OLOCX 6 BLOO
07811 9290 MCS7 END UNITED WAY
07812 9790 WESTERN MI.DWAY PRODUCT
07014 VOID WFINALMTOTALC
WARRANT RECONCI�N 9/17181
NAM JPI1Rf7 DISCOUNT
DATE REFERENCE
9/17/81
9 /17/51
911 T/ 01
9117/81
9/17/81
9/17191
9/17/81
9 /l7 /81
9/1'7/81
9/17/81
9/11/81
9/17/81
FINAL TOTALS
P*
NET
5. vHRR
�
Lr 105_13
L!1_D9
J
U S.fta
2 1.9.1
111.14
la.r
I J
7.n I
7n6. rl
i
92.84
I. 311.13
J
4.361.00
1_
411.226.46
J
I J
I
I J
IJ
IJ
� J
I
1
IJ
IJ
I
�a
IJ
I
IJ
I�
I
I '`
.. ............ .... ..r,
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC RNERAOE NCENSIM 1
1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSf(S) F
FILE NO.
PEE NO.
To: D.ponm.nr of AlooWi< E.emoye Control P
121505bvI p.n A.mardi'+O i
iiIAE BROTu O
OEOGRAPMICAE
E C 0; I Y E O �
--
rh. mraHdgnea n...Ar."P., For C
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAM 1
�C��OyDE -
6<em.<d.a W a. Nllo -r: A
AOM PIRSTAA710N
',. t
tamp. Permit
]. NAME(S) Of APPLICANT(S)
Appl ed under S.<. A TJ
S
ETnIw0 ^'n �• f
fl..Nre Oah.
- ]
] TYPE(5) OP RAN CTION(5) i
iFE H
.. ............ .... ..r,
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC RNERAOE NCENSIM 1
1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSf(S) F
FILE NO.
PEE NO.
To: D.ponm.nr of AlooWi< E.emoye Control P
121505bvI p.n A.mardi'+O i
iiIAE BROTu O
OEOGRAPMICAE
E C 0; I Y E O �
--
rh. mraHdgnea n...Ar."P., For C
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAM 1
�C��OyDE -
6<em.<d.a W a. Nllo -r: A
AOM PIRSTAA710N
',. t
tamp. Permit
]. NAME(S) Of APPLICANT(S)
Appl ed under S.<. A TJ
T6H.TAZI BStIG! A_ E
ETnIw0 ^'n �• f
fl..Nre Oah.
- ]
] TYPE(5) OP RAN CTION(5) i
iFE H
HC.
S
... ... H
HE 6
61.60 1
16
A N!10297 1
nir. Co.
S. lron Number and SAnmd m
mirrood Court
<iry oM Zip Code CeanrY 3
RECEIPT HO. 221(01 TOiAI p
3
7. At. Umin? wide
.. •• .••• •e Show TV eat lrtm C:p limin ?r Yew _
diMNN<!<4fA?SR�nr!i:r,!::i+K'y k4TFi 0. Mmlin9 Add,.,, (f d.0.1 -1 from M -Nombx old Slreel _ R• ^.II�C:
- - 9. Mo•. Yaa e..r
��. -•, _-_ _. .. __. .lieu
,
You Co trol Art
1M1. An? S
an-.r Io R-9 Or 10.n on aO «hmem ahmh rh.11 be
pen
❑. Appfmnr ogrem (a) then any manager employed in omrole limmed p<mivr ..:II M1e.e all the gonl'r4mYOm nl n feevee, and
(bl rhor he .ill n dolor or permit to to e.Irl.d eny of the pro. of de Mrohopr Re.e.ege Ca, rat Aa
nr e m ma.e a�u ^ ^r r
. .
13. STATE Of CALIFORNIA �•- -fin— Co." ni ... SIII BOm ( ^^ ..._Dnle B i'a
14. APPLICANT
µRr �.N�� �..w�rreM•Mw r.• "•�u � � M w•Awn, r�w� � .� p..
SIGN NERER �•3n.. f. L:._...._:. .___� .......... .. _ ...... __ ----- _..___..__,......
"..�a ..... _7 ....... .. _.._.. _..__........_._.._.. ..r ___.... .._...___.._.......__... _..__.___......_ ._.........
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
I5, STATE Of CALIFORNIA '... Cernry OI ..... . ..... ......... ..... ..... ... —:.. DoN ...' .. ...._ _ ._.... .. .,....
r n.r.r..r rv...nre. rr: r,.. nr +.r.: nN:. •, ••• M •nun.. <• n n.r rnr
••Mr.n . n. r.r.. x. _nr. .. ..^rrn r+4r.n . rt. n.r�rnr
Oa 3ni IPr,il, Odom Thi, curry For 01,11.1.101 Only .. _
A"6.d: Eemrded nark..
_..... m_ •� •. [OVIES MAaFO ._ 2.i�31
You Co trol Art
1M1. An? S
an-.r Io R-9 Or 10.n on aO «hmem ahmh rh.11 be
pen
❑. Appfmnr ogrem (a) then any manager employed in omrole limmed p<mivr ..:II M1e.e all the gonl'r4mYOm nl n feevee, and
(bl rhor he .ill n dolor or permit to to e.Irl.d eny of the pro. of de Mrohopr Re.e.ege Ca, rat Aa
nr e m ma.e a�u ^ ^r r
. .
13. STATE Of CALIFORNIA �•- -fin— Co." ni ... SIII BOm ( ^^ ..._Dnle B i'a
14. APPLICANT
µRr �.N�� �..w�rreM•Mw r.• "•�u � � M w•Awn, r�w� � .� p..
SIGN NERER �•3n.. f. L:._...._:. .___� .......... .. _ ...... __ ----- _..___..__,......
"..�a ..... _7 ....... .. _.._.. _..__........_._.._.. ..r ___.... .._...___.._.......__... _..__.___......_ ._.........
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
I5, STATE Of CALIFORNIA '... Cernry OI ..... . ..... ......... ..... ..... ... —:.. DoN ...' .. ...._ _ ._.... .. .,....
r n.r.r..r rv...nre. rr: r,.. nr +.r.: nN:. •, ••• M •nun.. <• n n.r rnr
••Mr.n . n. r.r.. x. _nr. .. ..^rrn r+4r.n . rt. n.r�rnr
Oa 3ni IPr,il, Odom Thi, curry For 01,11.1.101 Only .. _
A"6.d: Eemrded nark..
_..... m_ •� •. [OVIES MAaFO ._ 2.i�31
•
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 16, 1981
TO: city Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara %rall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Map, Improvement Security and
Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 6125
�ucnalo,I,
0
of �
VII >
1977
The subject map submitted by Rodney Young to divide .78 acre
into 2 parcels within the R -1 zone, was approved by the City
Engineer on July 7, 1980.
An Improvement Security and Improvement Agreement guaranteeing
the construction of off -site improvements for Parcel 1 has been
submitted by the developer in the amount of $24,000 and are
attached for City Council approval.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Parcel Map 6125 and accept the improvement security and
agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
?)R :jaa
Attachments
4
RESOLUTION NO. 131- 138'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6125,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6125)
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map flu. 6125, submitted by Rodney
Young, and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southeast corner of
Lemon and Archibald Avenues, being a division of Lot D, Foothill Frostless
Fruit Company's tract No. 2, recorded in Map Book 20, Page 34 records of
San Bernardino County, California was approved by the City Engineer of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga on July 7, 1980; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6125 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable
improvement security by Rodney Young as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and
said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same
are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 6125 be and the
same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present
same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Prillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
J
•
lJ
TEA/TAT /UE r., ......
PARCEL MAP NO. 6125 „eEI.,,,,R
lf/ lMf C /rY A� 9.NL417 GLY.A..iW�] / RUFMA
IEIXG A OIVISIOX OF LOT 0, i00i HILL FROWLE55 rte- p fei
FRUIT N. MY TN.CT NO 2. AS RECORCEO IX wen[ r]ro
N SOON 20. n..E SN. RECORDS OF SRN
."...0'No ICAM Y, CALIFORNIA
• dl F tr 'suet
vivairr ,wv
r �.
AA
P � e r /e nuo •
F F i
y s
LNI.L.M. AVENUE
G
i
fAVENUE
IY
•tea
I �
al.
n
I
,... ..M..r.
N
11
_ -
e �
y
i
j
SCALE
. SO.
ti
i
i. .I u
ail
I-
r �.
AA
P � e r /e nuo •
F F i
y s
LNI.L.M. AVENUE
G
i
fAVENUE
a
L
I �
_
n
S
A,
e �
y
i
j
SCALE
. SO.
CITY OF R.'. Coi CCCLIIO:.61 .
IfAR O': EPPIi 1. ,P E'i'uli
FGR
PARCEL 12. 6125
KNOW ALL NEN BY THESE PRESI%TS: That this agreement ;s grade and entered
into, in conformance with the prof- isions of the tnanicipal Code and Regulations
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and _
erefnnfter referred to as the Developer
I:ITESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the
City :f Parcel sbp tiu;afof _6125 in accordance with the
provisions of the report of the City Eng:ncor tr0reon, and any amendments
thereto; located S/S ,f Lemon, C/O Archibald
an'
WHEREAS, the City has established certain reguirmfmnes to ' i met by said n2l.
eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel ,. mp; and,
WHEREAS, the execution of this agree- ent and posting of improverent security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pupate Of securing
said approval;
HOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Oe';elcFer
as follows:
1. The Developer hereby Drees to construct at Developer's expense all .
improvements described on Page 3 hereof within nine months from the
date hereof. as per Section 2.12 of Ordinance No. 28,
2. The term of this agreement shall be nine months commencing on the date
of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default On
the day following the last day of the tern stipulated, unless said tern
has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional tine in which to rmplete the pro,
visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to
the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of.necessity
for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction s:ancirds,
cost estimate, and sufficiency of the fmprovament security, and t require
adjustments thereto when warranted by sal .tantial changes therein.
4. if the Developer fails or ne ;loots to ct,.ply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the rir,ht at any time to cause said prOviticns
to be completed by any la.,ful mans, and thereupon to recover from said
Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in se doing.
5. Encrnaef —It Permits Shall M rb Snire^ by thu ;cvcloprr frnn th, frile of
the City Engineer prior' la start of any '•.ark within the public r t Of wey.
and the Ueva lope' ctai1 a.r. L "-1. .v �: to full co, r. 'd '.J.:r�: n _
gulations contained therein.% hone co:.pl lance may rosult in stoppinD of the
work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided.
6. Public right of way irprovcrent wore required shalt be constructed in cam
fonmance with approved p
ir,ovrraent plan%, Standard Specifications, and
Standard Drawings and any special am,ndz.Prits thereto. Construction shall
Include any transitions and /Or other incidental work deemed necessary for
'drainage or public safety.
7
0
. UOROVEREaT AGRGIIE':T
C. ;, 2
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
DEVELOPER
nY:
BY: DATE:
WITNESS: DATE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
Ov. r wnvrn
AT
• r
v
CLERK
7. Work done within existing streets shall be dili5ently pursued to comple-
tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the
event of unjustified delay in conniption, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
means.
B, The Developer shall he responsible for replacement, relocation, or re-
moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the atar system.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and
other 'ebris from the public right of way resulting from work done on
the adjacent property or within laid right of way.
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement
security shall be not less than the amount shown below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED:
Faithful Performance Bond 24.0n9,00
Material and Labor Band $ 12 000 00
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
DEVELOPER
nY:
BY: DATE:
WITNESS: DATE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
Ov. r wnvrn
AT
• r
v
CLERK
E.YCROAC:L'...NT FLMt-, TE SC::EOCIZ
(Attach to "Ins,,ttor's Copy ")
DATE: 2 11T 181 PEA°11i SO. COYPLTEO BY o I [.
File Reference P.M. No. 6125 City Ora -"'; ::o.: 4y,t .
TOTT:.alaee not Include current fee far vrtr[n0 permlc or pav¢ncne [eplace-
went deposits.
CONSTRUCTION CnST F.5TT!!.1TE
ITEM
III V.i[if
::::TT
INTT 1111
S A "n "'.-
"
MISTROCTION INSPECTION -
of Cnnarnce!nn Cnne E.Sti.
P.I.C. _ C.F.
28
L.F.
.09
1.692.1 ^.
Cu iv C.F.
P.C.C. Curb nnly
L. V.
PF.RNANE`TT PAVF.Yl:NE RF.PLAC Y:IENT
A.C. Bern (SFOO to
STORE MATUT'L T:! RICIIT -OF -WAY
a" P. .C. lk' '
1 ¢n
S.
1.75
P nr;
rosch
V Drive ACc... M1
--
.F.
S. F'.
2,10
1
94+ "t
A" P.C.C. Cross Out cc[
-
S. F.
Street Excavation
323--
C.Y.
975
Enbofkaene
C.f.
Pre....t
Pteoa ru fun of Sub nd!
5720
S.P.
0.
7.n4l,i,r
R r" 1
A.C. c IJ tonTON
Tn
13
A.C. 900 to I30O tonal
TON
I
Alcdc.r 500 t 900 tonr
TON
d• 500 t nJ
111
Tn':
Pa ,,h A.C.
S.F.
i" nick A.C. C. CNIr Over lav
8 36tl
S.E.
0.3
A
EA
Adjust Sever C.O. to Grade
EA.
Adjust Water Valves [o Gradr
2
EA.
EA.
Sticet Si ne
E.A.
et Treed
EA.
Ritdtlpi fnr LOnSt.
1..$.
L
M rl
fl r
a
E..
(lea rin Sawcut b Removals
1.
1.6.
1 cp.:n
RETAININn wAT1
I '
BL.CRVALLS
L.P.
U,Y05CAPE b IRRtCATION
L.N.
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 21.826. ^0
TMSPECT100 FFPS
0
ITFY
nP. 1'I'
i•II
V•!
MISTROCTION INSPECTION -
of Cnnarnce!nn Cnne E.Sti.
VAV'Nt,'T IXT P'9
PF.RNANE`TT PAVF.Yl:NE RF.PLAC Y:IENT
L. 1'.
STORE MATUT'L T:! RICIIT -OF -WAY
Fj
I. TOTAL, INSPECTION FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S
E
It. COb'ACTION TEST FEES . •
lit. 10% CONTINGENCIES . . . S 2.191 n^
IV. OESICN FEES (10i of Total Ccc11r !tlnn T.Oit Estin.,tc) . S
TOTAL . S
Faithful Performance Bond . S -
Mat¢tfal and Labor Baud - $ 12, 000 AO
Matnrenan<c Bond • $
Cash Yom,monelny Ocposltt S '
ReME I?
—_ . H tM1I Caoie Addrr.ss EankArnelica LL
INTERICATIONAL BANKING OFFICE 0662 P:Or —BOX 3141
Puce TEMINAL ANNEX, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90051 Date AUGUST 24, 1981
IRREVOCABLE
All dfa marked.
Adnsng bank reference no
STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT
usank of America
�musf�brf
Crewn
cretlA nA -17012
Advising bank
Eor account of
RODNrEY YOUNG
9727 LEMON
ALTA LO?iA, CALIFORNIA 91701
To beneficiary
Amount
CITY OF RA9CHO CUCA TONGA
U.S. CY. $24,000.00 (TWENTY FOUR THOUSAN[D
9320 BASE LINE ROAD
AND NO 1100 DOLLARS)
ALTA LO::A, CALIFORNIA 90701
Expuabon date AUGUST 31, 1983
Gentlemen D This refers to preliminary cable advice of this credit.
We hereby estab'lsh our irrevocable letter of credit In your favor available by your drafts drawn at SIGHT
on US
RKI:RRS�S:Rd91R5k.�A'OGW'). SOIAARRdd.'BR>CtlOY9[
I
COVERING:
100;' OF FAITHFUL PERFORDIANCE BOND UNDER FILE REFERENCE P.M. NO. 6125,
CITY DRAWING (i401, PARCEL NAP 06125 ENTERED BETWEN CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA ACID RODNEY YOUNG FOR Ii1TROVENENT AGREEMIT FOR PARCEL
IIAP N0, 6125.
DOCUHENT REQUIRED:
YOUR LETTER CERTIFYINTG THAT RODNEY YOUNG HAS FAILED TO PERFORM AS
REQUIRED UNDER ItTROVEPIE`i!T AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP NO.6125.
rjc
V /r: nnrrpy pnq iln ,4h you Ibal ail doMls rlrnvr. antler rind m
Adv:smg bank 't nohfirabon
eompnancu Mil Inn Trans pf Ihi, crrdi vim be d;I, fmnnmd
If didvm ;ml Inn;nrllod fci payment al Ih15 oRilo nn ry lu:fpra
ihp ippvalnn n)?, of hiS loW
Smcrrrly ypurs.
Aell�,n ^; I cnunlor— t+;�aWro Awhon; rrY 5 gnp;ipr,
Pin�n, date name nnfl semnhrr^ or the nAv •,irg b "k
E
G
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 16, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Minority Business Enterprise Policy and Program
N :..•0"
Attached for City Council consideration is a resolution adopting
a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) Affirmative Action Policy
and Program pursuant to 99 CFR23 Federal Register. If recipients
of Federal Department of Transportation funds are to continue to
receive assistance, they are required to adopt a MBE Program for
all Department of Transportation assisted projects. Normal City
projects would not be subject to the program.
The City has received D.O.T. funds (F.A.U. funding) for several
projects in the past including Base Line Widening, Base Line/
Hellman Signal and Archibald /Church Signal.
The next D.O.T. assisted project is Vineyard Widening from 8th to
Arrow including signals. This project will be 90% funded with
F.A.U. up to $300,000.
The MBE policy in brief requires the City to state its goal for
minority business participation (subcontracts) on each project.
For the Vineyard Project, a goal of 68 to 98 for minorities and
0^„ to 3% for females has been established. This goal is stipulated
in the contract documents and all bidders are to demonstrate their
good faith efforts to meet the goal. Efforts at meeting the goal
will be considered in award of the contract.
This is only the most recent in a line of Federal obstacles to
spending ?rant money. In this case, and with all road improvements,
we should have no trouble meeting the set goal. Most concrete
contractors are minority businesses and will provide the required
percentage.
The program only relates to Federally funded projects and is a small
inconvenience to pay for the funds.
City Council and City Manager
STAFF REPORT
Minority Business Enterprise
Policy and Program
September 16, 1961
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution
adopting a Minority Business Enterprise Policy and Program.
Respectfully submitted,
LBR:hIP:jaa
Attachments
1a
`I
•
0 RESOLUTION NO. 'I I-L32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY AND
PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, Federal Register 49 CFR, Part 23 requires recipients
of Department of Transportation Financial Assistance to prepare and
submit for Department of Transportation approval a Minority Business
Enterprise Affirmative Action Program; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to benefit from Department
of Transportation Financial Assistance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, in accordance with Federal Registar 49 CFR,
Part 23 that the following policy and program be submitted for Department
of Transportation approval as the City of Rancho Cucamonga Minority
Business Enterprise Policy and Program to become effective and to be im-
plemented upon approval by Department of Transportation.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of Septemher, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Fa urnn' 1.flIT" ern 1.7n, City C1P.rk
L
Phillip 0. Schlosser, Mayor
13
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MINORITY BUSINESS PROGRAM
I. Policv Statement
It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to utilize Minority
Business Enterprises in all aspects of contracting to the maximum extent
feasible.
This policy is fully described in the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Minority Business Program which consititutes City policy and a
commitment to substantially increase Minority Business and Female
Business Utilization. This policy includes any program or facility
funded wholly or in part by any U.S. Department of Transportation modal
element, through the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its contractors and subcontractors, which
are the recipients of Federal -aid funds, agree to ensure that minority
• business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts and subcontracts. In this regard, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and all of its contractors and subcontractors will take
allreasonable steps in accordance with 49CFR23 to ensure that minority
business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and
perform contracts.
KI
14
II. Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) Liaison Officer
Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer is the MBE Liaison Officer for the City of .
Rancho Cucamonga and shall report to the City Manager. Mr. Hubbs will
be assigned such staff as is necessary to fully implement the provision
of 49CFR Part 23 and such other MBE programs as may be required. The
reporting structure and duties of support staff are shown on Attachment B.
III. Duties of the MBE Liaison Officer
The MBE Liaison Officer shall develop, manage and implement the MBE
Program for DDT funded projects on a day -to -day basis. The Liaison Officer
shall.:
- Develop and carry out technical assistance programs for MBE's.
- Arrange solicitations, time for the presentation of bids, quantities,
specifications, and delivery schedules, so as to facilitate the
participation of PJBF.'s. Where such changes are found necessary to .
increase MBE utilization, they will be made in consultation and
cooperation with the functional unit involved.
- Provide assistance to MBE's in overcoming barriers, such as inability
to obtain bonding or financing.
- Carry out information and communication programs on contracting
opportunities in a timely manner. Programs shall be bilingual where
appropriate.
- Investigate the full extent of services offered by banks owned and
controlled by minorities or women. Ensure that, where possible,
the City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages use of said banks.
- Utilize a listing of MBE's certified by Ca LTrans. Said listing to be
made available to all bidders on City of Rancho Cucamonga Federal Aid
Highway projects. Such listing shall include, at a minimum, the
following information: ,Fame, address, telephone number, ethnic and /or •
sexual ownership, type of work performed by firm.
-2'
15
- Approve ally removal and /or substitution of a Minority Business
Enterprise during contract performance. Prior to approval of sub -
stitution and /or removal of MBE, prime contractors will be required
to prove performance of good faith efforts to replace the MBE with
another eligible MBE.
- Establish overall City goals for both minority and female business
enterprises. Goals shall be evaluated on September 30 of each year
and adjusted as necessary.
- Establish individual project goals for minority and female business
enterprises. All DOT funded projects with an estimated cost of
$100,000.00 or more will be evaluated for the appropriateness of goals.
- Maintain such documentation as is necessary to verify City performance
of the above activities.
IV. Establishment of Overall City Coal
' The City of Rancho Cucamonga will establish an overall goal for its use
of MBE's on DOT funded projects. This goal will be updated annually as
of September 30, of each year. The City's overall goal and the methodology
used to determine the goal for the fiscal period beginning July 1, 1981
to October 1, 1982 is shown on Attachment A.
V. Contract Goals
All projects with an estimated value of $100,000 or more, receiving U.S.
DOT funds, will be evaluated for the appropriateness of MBE. goals. Projects
will be evaluated and goals established, utilizing the following criteria:
- Size of project.
- Opportunities for MBE's as subcontractors, vendors, suppliers.
- Minority population of county in which work is to be performed.
- EzisLing MBE: goals being utilized in the project area by other State,
Federal or local jurisdictions.
- Availability of MBE's.
- Past experience on projects similar to the projects being evaluated.
-3-
4
- Such other factors as may effect the utilization of 11DE's.
Each project will be evaluated in conformance with the above criteria. •
Complete documentation will be retained of every project so evaluated.
Contracts which do not contain specific goals will contain the following
provisions:
(1) "Policy. It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that
minority business enterprises as defined in 49 CPR Part 23 shall
have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of
contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under
this agreement. Consequently, the MBE requirements of 49 CFR
Part 23 apply to this agreement."
(2) "MBE Obligation. (i) The recipient or its contractor agrees to
ensure that minority business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part
23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of
contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal .
funds provided under this agreement. In this regard, all recipients
or contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that minority business
enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform
contracts. Recipients and their contractors shall not discriminate
on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award
and performance of DOT- assisted contracts."
MBE use on projects without goals will be reported to the Liaison Office-
and will be included in City reports to Caltrans and to the appropriate
DOT element. MBE use on such projects will be counted toward attainment
of the overall City goal.
VI. Public Notification
At the time of submittal of this program to the U.S. Department of Trans-
portation, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will publish a notice in both
minority and majority local media. Said publication shall:
-4-
17
- Announce the City of Rancho Cucamonga's overall goals.
- Inform the public that the goals and a description of how they were
set, are available for public inspection for a period of 30 days.
- Inform the public that both U.S. DOT and the City will accept comments
on the goals for 45 days from the date of the notice.
- The notice shall advise interested parties that comments are for
informational purposes only.
In addition to the foregoing, interested minority and majority contractor
organizations will receive direct mailings of this complete program with
a request that they provide written comments to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
on this program.
VII. Contract Procedure
This plan shall be implemented through the utilization of a contract
special provision which is attached hereto. These procedures require
bidders to submit the names of MHE subcontractors and suppliers, a
description of the work each is to perform or material to be furnished,
• and the dollar value of each MBE subcontract.
VIII. MBE Notification
All MBE's on the CalTrans certified MBE listing will receive appropriate
notification of projects scheduled to be advertised. MBE assistance
centers will also receive notification. All assistance centers funded by
the U.S. Department of Commerce (Minority Business Development Administration)
and designated as State Plan Rooms will receive complimentary plans and
specifications for projects within their geographical area of responsibility.
I:'.. : ?innriC, and 4r.i10 Owned Banks
The City of Rancho Cucamonga will encourage all contractors to use the
services of banks owned and controlled by minorities or females.
-5- 18
X. Selection Criteria for Contracts with MBE Goals
Every contract containing MBE goals shall he evaluated by the MBE Liaison
Officer or his /her designee to ascertain bidding contractors' efforts
to attain the MBE goals. The award of any project with MBE goals must be
concurred with by the MBE Liaison Officer or his /her designee before said
contract may be awarded. Should there be disagreement between the City
functional units concerning contractors' efforts to attain contract goals
for MEE participation, the matter shall be referred to the City Manager
or his /her designee, for final determination.
Competitors that fail to meet the MBE goals and fail to demonstrate
sufficient reasonable efforts shall not be eligible to be awarded the
contract.
Any contracts that contain MBE goals, pursuant to this policy, will be
monitored on an ongoing basis by project personnel during the course of
construction. The MBE Liaison Officer is to be immediately advised of
any circumstances wherein contractor compliance with the MBE provision
is questionable. The contractor shall submit a final report for each .
project with MBE goals which includes total payments to the prime con-
tractor as well as payments the prime contractor has made to MBE sub-
contractors, vendors and suppliers. If the report indicates the prime
contractor has not achieved the project goals, project personnel shall
attach an evaluation, in narrative form, of the reasons for failure to
attain the goals and any corrective action that was taken.
Prime contractors will be required to notify the City personnel of any
situ,itfon in which regularly scheduled progress payments are not made
to !W: ;;ubcuntn!ctors, vendors or suppliers.
If determined necessary by the PBE Liaison Officer, the City will con-
sider the use of MBE set - asides as a tool to achieve the overall City
goal.
-6-
1 I
r1
U
XII. Counting MBE Participants
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its contractors, and subcontractors shall
count MBE participation in accordance with the provisions of Section
23.47, Title 49, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
XTII. Records and Reports
The MBE Liaison Officer shall maintain such records, and provide such
reports, as are necessary to ensure full compliance with this policy.
Such records and reports shall include, as a minimum, the following
information:
- Procedures which have been adopted to comply with this MBE policy.
- Awards to MBE's.
- Awards to majority contractors.
- Final project reports concerning MBE utilization.
- Such other data as is needed to fully evaluate City compliance with
this program.
The ;BE Liaison Officer shall submit reports to Caltrans and to U.S.
DOT elements as required. These reports will include:
- Number and dollar value of contracts awarded to MBE's.
- Description of general categories of contracts awarded to MBE's.
- The percentage of the dollar value of all contracts awarded during
the quarter which were awarded to MBE's.
- Indication as to the extent of which the percentage met or exceeded
the overall City goal.
- Reports shall be broken down separately by ethnic grouping and sex.
XIC. MBE Listing,
The City of Rancho Cucamonga will utilize a listing of firms certified
by CalTrans to be Minority Businesses in accordance with the DOT Order.
This listing will he developed and maintained in accordance with
Sections 23.51, 23.53, 23.55 and 23,87 of 49 CFR. This listing shall
be made available to prospective contractors at no charge.
-7-
o(,V
Contractors will be permitted to rely upon the authenticity of firms
listed in this directory. A contractor desiring to use a MBE not
included in the CalTrans certified listing will be allowed to do so,
but will be required to provide the appropriate certification from the
MDE before such participation is counted towards award of the project.
XV. Comnlaints
Any complaints received by the City of Rancho Cucamonga concerning this
program will be investivated by the City. The City will endeavor to
resolve said complaints within 90 days of receipt by the MBE Liaison
Officer. The appropriate DOT element will be furnished a copy of the
complaint and invited to participate in the investigation /resolution.
The DOT element will receive a complete investigative report on the
complaint and will be requested to concur in the proposed disposition
of said complaint.
Contractors will be directed to notify the City of any complaints they
may receive concerning this program. 0
•
-8- ai
ATTACIUMENT "A"
• Minority Bossiness Enterprise Goal, City of Rancho Cucamonga
The overall M.B.E. goal for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 9% composed of a
Minority goal range from 62 to 9% and a Female goal range from 02 to 3%. The
percentages indicated shall be based upon the total value of prime contracts
and subcontract approvals as they relate to the total U.S. DOT funds received
for contracting purposes by the City of Rancho Cucmmonga.
This goal covers the period of from July 1, 1981 through September 30, 1982.
The above goal includes federal funds furnished to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as a subrecipient to CALTRANS, wherein CALTRANS has the authority to authorize
contract advertisement /award. The above goals are based upon past City experience,
availability of MBE's and anticipated opportunities for MBE's.
This goal is established based upon the following:
- Rancho Cucamonga anticipates expending $270,000 in contracts using U.S,
DOT funds.
- Rancho Cucamonga anticipates that one contract valued over $100,000.00 will
be awarded in FY 1981 -82. Contracts under $100,000.00 are not expected
to contain goals for MBE.
- Rancho Cucamonga anticipates that the prime contractor will perform not less
thnn 50% of the total contract price per State specifications and the dollar
amount to be suh- contracted will be 550,000 based upon the items the prime
centniztor will elect to porfarm with his own forces.
- Rancho Cucamonga anticipates that of the 8 minimum possible M.B.E. contractors
to bid 10 of 23 items to be subcontracted, 3 will be successful resulting in
n dollar amount of $25,000.00.
9
1 Z
Attachment "1"
Page 2
- Therefore, Rancho Cucamonga anticipates that this contract will average
9- (25/270 = .092) Minority Business Enterprise.
- Minority Labor Force available to Rancho Cucamonga per available statistics:
Female 35%
Black 3%
Hispanic 157,
Other 2%
237 of the 274+ MBE subcontractors and suppliers in San Bernardino County
are female.
•
- Therefore, Rancho Cucamonga anticipates a range from 0 to 3% (9 X .23 = 2.07)
MBE Female and a range from 67. to 99. (9 - 3 = 6) MEE minority goal. 0
•
aE
s
11
ATTACEMENT "B"
Reporting Structure and Duties of Liaison Officer Support Staff
Organization
Chart Duties
CITY MANAGER Insure that MBE Policy is implemented
as adopted by City Council.
Take appropriate action to resolve
-� disagreements.
LIAISON OFFICER
City Engineer See Section III of Policy.
Lloyd Hobbs I
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEER Assist the Liaison Officer in implemen-
Monte Prescher ting the MBE Program through the contract
bid documents and contract award. Aid
in establishment of contract goals.
Assist the Liaison Office in insuring
contractor compliance with the contract
after award.
PUBLIC WORKS Assist the Liaison Officer in insuring
contractor compliance through receiving
INS PIiCTGR reports and taking interviews and making
field observations and keeping records
in daily diary of contract activities.
09
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANT WORK ON
VINEYARD AVENUE BETWEEN EIGHTH STREET AND ARROW ROUTE AND A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND VINEYARD
AVEN IIE
SECTION 1 - SPECIFICATIONS
1 -1.01 GENERAL. The work embraced herein shall be done in accordance with the
Standard Specifications, State of California, Department of Transportation, January 1981
edition, insofar as the same may apply and in accordance with the following special
provisions. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Plans and the specified drawings of
the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Standards and the Standard Plans, dated
January 1981, State of California, Department of Transportation, shall also apply and arc
hereby made a parr of these Special Provisions.
1 -1.02 INTENT. It is the intent of these spocifications and any contract plans, that
the work performed under the contract shall result in a complete operating system in
satisfactory wracking condition with respect to the functional purpose of the installations.
The specifications and contract drawing ate intended to be complementary of each other.
Any work shown on the contract drawings and not in the specifications, of vice - versa, is
to be eecutcd u if indicated in both.
The Standard Specifications uc put of the Contract Doetunents controlling the work.
1 -1.03 DEFINITIONS - The provisions of Section 1 of the Standard Specifications
apply with the following modifications and additions:
Ajmc_y er Start; Where the word agency or state appears in the Standard Specifications,
it shall mean the City of Rand,o Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California.
,Ii21Ld: Where the word board appears in the Standard Specifications it shall mean the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California.
AUci=y__r1snala1, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
1.HL4i_dU_LY: The laboratory designated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to test
materiAs and work involved in the contract.
.iY9titt�e�9li:.:SI91a: Notice Inviting Bids.
S9Ili=. ,t: The party of the 2nd part entering into contract with the City of Randto
Cucamonga for furnishing of material and the performance of work required by these
specifications, and including his duly authorized agents acting severally within the scope
of their authorities.
30
�J
•
jU: City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California.
Co .n .: City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
CJ
0
u
Day, Where the word days appears in the Specificatiorss it shall mean consecutive
calendar days unless otherwise noted.
Ditectot: Where the word director appears in the Specifications it shall mean the City
Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
F teinecr: The City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga acting personally or
through agents or assistants duly authorized by him.
1nsp ce tor: The engineering or technical personnel authorized to act as agents for the
Engineer in the supervision of work covered by these specifications, limited to the
particular duties mtrustcd to him or them.
Working Day: Any day accpt Saturday S, Sundays, or legal holidays and days on which
the Conractor is specifically required by the Special Provisions, by his labor contract or
by law to suspend construction operations. Also accepted is any, day on which the
Contractor is prevented by inclement weather, or conditions resulting therefrom from
proceeding with at least 75% of the normal labor and equipment force for at least five
hours toward completion of the current controlling operation.
31
a�
SECTIOI; 2. PROPOSAL REQL'IP.EMESTS AND CONDITIONS
2 -1.01 GENERAL. The bidder's attention is directed to the provisions of
Section 2 "Proposed Requirements and Conditions," of the Standard Spec ificatis
and these Special Provisions for the requirements and conditions which Ice must
observe in the preparation of the proposal form and the submission of the bid.
The far for Bidder's Bond mentioned in the last paragraph in Section 2 -1.07,
"Pronesal Cuarantv," of the Standard Specifications will be found following
the signature Page.
The second and third paragraphs in Section 2 -1.11, "Competency of Bidders,"
of the Standard Specifications are amended to read:
In accordance with the provisions of the State Contract Act, prospective bidders
on contracts, the estimated cost of which exceeds $300,000, must file with the
Department answers to questions contained in a standard form of questionnaire
and financial statement which includes- a complete statement of their financial
ability and experience in performing public works. Standard forms of such
questionnaire and financial statement may be obtained from the Department of
Transportation, 1120 % Street, Sacramento, California 95814. Prospective bidders
will not be furnished proposal forms for contracts, the estimated cost of which
is core then $300,000, unless said bidders have submitted such questionnaire and
financial statements for prequalification at least 5 days prior to the date fixed
for publicly opening sealed bids, and have been prequalified for, at least one
day prior to said date.
Pros ^ective bidders on contracts, the estimated cost of which is not more than
$300,000, are not required to be prequalified and need not conform to the
requirements of prequalification.
2 -1.02 :111(ORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE. This project is subject to part 23
Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations entitled "Participation By Minority
Business Enterprise in Department of Transportation Programs." Portions of the
Regulaticns are set forth in Section 6 -1.05, of these special provisions,
and the regulations in their entirety are incorporated herein by this reference.
Bidders shall be fully informed respecting the requirements of the Regulations;
particular attention is directed to the following matters:
(.a) A Minority Business: Enterprise (MBE) must be a small business concern
as defined pursuant to Section 3 of U.S. Small Busincs Act;
('a) An!!;IE -ay participntc as a prime Contractor, subcontractor, joint
ven L', :r :+ n.t[ta._t' kith .1 pride or S� :b Cnnt r� :C Ca [, Or ven('or of natcri,il
or :,uiplirs;
(c) :,n >:IIE joint ventura partner must be responsible for a clearly defined
p�nti;;n of the work to be performed in addition to satisfying require -
r. s 10V 0wnerShii) and control. The MBE venturer must submit
Sebaduic B of the Regulations;
(d) An MBE must perform a commefciully useful function, i.e., most be
responsible for the execution of a distinct element of the work and •
muse carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing
and supervising the work;
32
a7
(e) Credit for an MBE vendor of materials or supplies is limited to 20
percent of the price unless the vendor manufactures or substantially
• alters the goods;
(:) An MBE must be certified before credit may be allowed toward the MBE
goal. The Department's MBE Directory identifies MBEs which have been
certified and others which may qualify for certification. The MBE
directory may be obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering
Division, 9340 Base Line Road, Suite B, P.O. Be. 807, Rancho Cucamonga,
California, 91730 (phone 714- 989 - 1851).
C!
16
(g) Noncompliance by the Contractor with the requirements of the regulations
constitutes a breach of this contract and may result in termination of
the contract or other appropriate remedy for such breach.
(h) Bidders are encouraged to utilize services offered by banks owned and
controlled by minorities or women.
2 -1.03 MBE COALS FOR THIS PROJECT. The Department has established a total
Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) participateion goal of percent for
this project composed of percent to percent MBE's owned and con-
trolled by ninorities and percent to percent owned and controlled
by women. A Certificate of Assurance concerning this goal is included in the
proposal and shall be executed by the bidder.
33
a�
SECTION 3. SUBMISSION OF MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ISFOMATION, AWARD
AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT •
3 -1.01 GENER.IL. The bidder's attention is directed to the provisions in
Seccica 3, "Award and Execution of Contract," of the Standard Specifications
and these special provisions for the requirements and conditions concerning
submittal of MBE information, award, and execution of contract.
3- 3.01:1 ME INFORMATION. The apparent successful bidder (low bidder) shall
subnic `!E!i information to the office at which bids were received no later
than five (5) calendar days following bid opening, unless a later time is
authrrized by the Department. Other bidders need nor submit MBE informa-
tion unless requested to do so by the Department. When such request is
made, the MBE information of such bidder shall be submitted within 5 days,
unless a later tine is authorized by the Department. The information shall
include;
(1) Sages of MBEs to be used, with a complet description of work or
suppiies to be provided by each and the dollar value of each
such ?:BE transaction;
X37i subcontractors for signal and lighting items, if there
are such items of work, must have been named in the bid - See
Section entitled "Subcontracting" of these special provisions)
(2) A "Minority and Female Business Engerprise Questionnaire"
( Schedule A) for each MBE not already certified;
(3) Schedule B for each :IBC joint venturer. .
Bi!ders whoso submittal in (1) above indicates they will meet the stated MBE
goal need not submit any furcher MBE information, unless the Department in
its re,'iow finds that the goal has not been met, in which case additional
information will be requested by the Department. the additional information
may be requested to clarify claimed bIBE participation, add MBE participation,
or dcmonsLrato that a good faith effort was made to meet the MBE goal. Such
information shall be submitted promptly upon request by the Department.
It is the bidder's responsibility to meet the goal of MBE participation or
to provide inforration to establish good faith efforts to do so. Such
infufnntion should include the following:
(4) The names and dates of advertisement of each newspaper, trade
papnr, and minority -focus paper in which a request for MBE
participation for this project was placed by the bidder;
(5) Tho nano., and data., of nocices of all certified MBEs solicited
by direct mail for this project;
(6) Ti:c itena of work for which the bidder requested subbids or
cnLarinls to be soppliod by MBiSs;
(7) The names of MBEs who suh:nitted bids for any of the work indicated
in (6) above which were not accepLed, the name of the subcontractor •
or supplier that was selected for that portion of work, and the
reasons for the bidder's choice, (If the reason was price, give
the price bid by the rejected MBE and the price bid by the selected
subcontractor or supplier);
34
(9) Assistance that the bidder has extended to MBEs identified in
(7) above to remedy the deficiency in the MBEs subbids.
. (9) Any additional data to support a demonstration of good faith
effort, such as contacts with MBE assistance agencies.
C�
is
7 -1.01C IIE OF AWARD. The award of contract to the successful bidder will
be made within 45 days after the opening of the proposals. If the first
bidder selected as a successful bidder refuses or fails to execute the
contract, the Director may award the contract to the second successful bidder
selocced as above provided and such an award, if made, will be made within
60 days after the opening of the proposals. If the second successful
bidder refuses or fails to execute the contract, the Director may award the
contract to the third successful bidder selected as above provided and such
an award, if made, will be made within 75 days after opening of the proposals.
The periods of time specified above within which the award of contract may
be made shall be subject to an
35
3a
- extension for such further period as may be agreed upon in writing between the
., Dcpa[unmt and the bidder concerned.
'- Failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, file acceptable bonds as provided
in Section 3 -1.02, "Contract Bonds," of the Standard Specifications, secure all insurance
and furnish all certificates required by the specifications, within 15 calendar days, after
sucl: bidder has received notice that the contract has been awarded, shall be just cause for
forfeiture of rite proposal guaranty. The successful bidder may file with the Director a
w:iteen notice signed by the bidder or his authorized representative, specifying that the
bidder will refuse to execute the contract II presorted to him. The filing of such notice
sh.cll have the same force and effect as the failure of the bidder to execute the contract
„ and furnish acceptable bonds within the time hereinbefore prescribed.
3 -1.02 CONTRACT BONDS. The successful bidder, simultaneously with the execution
of the Contract shall furnish a Labor and Materials Bond in an amount not less than one
hundred percent (100 %) of the Contract price and a Faithful Performance Bond in an
amount not less than one hundred percent (loo °o) of the Contract price. Said bonds shall
be secured from a surety company satisfactory to the City and the premiums thereon shall
be paid by the Contractor. After completion and acceptance of the work by the City
Council, the bands shall be in full force and effect for a time thereafter of sixty days.
3 -1.03 INSGRA -NCE. The Contractor shall furnish the City with satisfactory proof of
carrying the insurance required in Section 7 -1.12, "Responsibility for Damage," of the
Standard Specifications. In addition, the Contractor is requited to have:
(a) Workmen's Compensation Insurance to cover employees as required by the Labor
Code of the State of California; and the Contractor shall requite all
subcontractors to provide such compensation insurance for all of the litter's
employees.
3 -1.O4 PERMITS. No work shall be started within the street right -of -way or on City
property until the Contractor her obtained the necessary permits. The Contractor shall
obtain and pay for all permits and fees and give all notices necessary and incident to the
due and lawful prosecution of the work and to the preservation of the public health and
safety. Fees will not be collected on those permits obtained from the Public Works
Depattment for City -owned projects, The City will obtain a permit for work to be
performed within the City of Ontario. Contractor shall be named on said permit and
shall be responsible for complying with all provisiors therewith. Contractor will also be
requited to pay a user fee for any construction water used.
For work on private property where shown on the plans, the City will provide rights on
entry at no cost to the Contractor. Such rights of entry do not relieve the Contractor
of the need to provide, at his cost, permits and insurance requited of the Contractor by
ot!:cr agencies and orga••ir atiofs. Refermce Section 7 of the Standard Specification:,
Con ;n ;actor fs eespursible for complying with all requirements Widuding being named on
any requirui ! ;is it of Entry Permir or License) of the AT & SF Railway Co, No work
shall begun until all tees ate paid and permits secured.
3 -1.05 1.1 CENS IiS. The Contractor shall obtain and pay for all costs incurred for
licenses necessitated by his operations. Prior to starting any work the Contractor shall
be requbcd to have a City of Rancho Cucamonga Business License valid for the life of the
36
7, I
Cl
. contract; his subcontractors shall also have Business Licenses valid for the time they are
engaged in work.
0
0
The Contractor shall obtain a permit for excavation from the Division of Industrial
Safety as provided for in the Labor Code, Section 6424.
37
319
•- SECTION 4. BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION AND •
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
4 -1.01 GENERAL. Attention is directed to the provisions in Section B -1.03,
"Beginning of Work," in Section B -1.06, "Time of Completion," and in Section 5 -1.07,
"Liquidated DamageS," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions.
•- The Contractor shall begin work within 15 days from the date specified in the "Notice to
Proceed" said Notice to ixlude notification of the approval of the contract as provided in
Section 5 -1.03 of the Starxiard Specifications. The Contractor shall diligently prosecute
the szme to completion before the expiration of 120 working days after the date of said
approval.
The Contractor shall pay to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the sum of $200 per day, for
cacti and every calendar day's delay in finishing the work in excess of the number of
- working days prescribed above. The acceptance, by the Contractor, of any progress
payr:ents accompanying any estimate, without written protest to the City, is an
acknow9edg ®ant by the Contractor that the number of calendar days and /or calendar day's
ddy is correct.
36
.I
•
•
C
CJ
1T11 nV D A XTrWA PT TO A "ANTr a
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 16, 1981 0�
all ?
T0: City Council and City Manager
U1 UI. 5
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer/ • 19-17 SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds and Notices of Completion
Parcel Map. 5760 - located on Pittsburgh Avenue north of 6th Street
OWNER: O'Donnell, Brigham & Partners
4350 Von Kaman Avenue, Suite 400
Newport Beach, Ca. 92660
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $446,500.00
The road construction for Parcel Map 5760 has been approved as being in
accordance with the road improvement plan and it is recommended that the
City Council accept the roads and authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion.
Parcel Map 5157 - located at the Northwest corner of 4th Street and Haven
Avenue
OWNER: John D. Lusk & Son
P.O. Box C -19560
Irvine, California 92713
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $253,000.00
The road construction for Parcel Map 5157 has been approved as being in
accordance with the road improvement plan and it is reoomnended that the
City Council accept the roads and authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion.
LBH:bc
34
RESOLUTION NO. S I— I YD
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAPS NOS. 5760 AND 5157 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of street improvements for Parcel Maps
Nos. 5760 and 5157 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed,
certifying the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted
and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion
with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
AE :NT:
ATTEST:
Lauren 11. Wasserman, City Clerk
0
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
3�
L
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
The street address of said property is: N/A
DATED: , 19 .
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
municipal corporation, Owner
0 BY:
Llcl
36 -1-
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate
in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which
interest or estate is: Parcel Map 5760 .
•
2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is:
CITY OF RA1rCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Be.
807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 16th day of September , 1981, there was com-
pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of im-
provement set forth in the contract documents for
Street Improvements
4. The name of the original contractor for the work of im-
provement as a whole was O'Donnell, Brigham 6 Partners
5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the
City Of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California,
and is described as follows:
Parcel Map 5760
The street address of said property is: N/A
DATED: , 19 .
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
municipal corporation, Owner
0 BY:
Llcl
36 -1-
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730
WJIEN RECORDED HAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA
Pos- Office Box 807
Ranci.c Cucamonga, California
91730
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREDY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate
in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which
interest or estate is: parcel Map No. 5157
2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: •
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, 9320 -C Baseline P.oad, Post 0ff 1Ce Box
807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 16th day of September , 1981, there was ccm-
pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work or im-
provement set forth in the contract documents for
Street Improverents
4. The name of the original contractor for the work of im-
provement as a whole was John D. Lusk b Son
5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Count; of San Bernardino, California,
and is dasccibe3 os Eollows:
parcel Nap No. 5157
The street address of said property is: N/A
DATED: , 19 .
CITY OF RANCHO CCCAXONGA, a
municipal corporation, owner
BY: •
(Noce)
(Title)
37 -1-
QTY OF RANCHO C UANIONGA
STAFF REPORT
Date: September 10, 1981
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: Base Line Road Closure
November 14, 1981, is the date for the Third Annual Founders
Day Parade.
As in the past, this will necessitate closing Base Line Road
between Carnelian and Archibald from 8 a.m. until approximately
noon. The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Office will assist in this
closure again this year.
Notification to home owners and commercial enterprises located
along the parade route will take place by written correspondence
as well as personal contact.
If we can supply further information, please contact us.
l J
BH /mw
3�S
7
.9
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
September 10, 1981
City Council and City Manager
Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Request authorization to initiate procedings with
CalTrans regarding closure of Foothill Boulevard
for 1982 Founders Day Parade.
We request authorization to begin procedings with CalTrans
regarding the closure of Foothill Boulevard for the 1982
Founders Day Parade, to be held on November 13.
The closure of a State Highway for a parade has been done
several times in the past. It would seem that CalTrans
has been agreeable in these instances.
We will, of course, find the best alternate route for
the detour of traffic.
If we can supply additional information, please contact our
office.
BH /mw
3�
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 16, 1981
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: JACK LAM, A.I.C.P, Director of Community Development
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
c�cwn'I�N
C� C
z 1
0i A
Fi Z
Un 9
1977
SUBJECT: POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FORECAST FOR INCLUSION IN 0SCAG -82"
ABSTRACT: This report reviews the population and employment forecast for
the West End Cities as prepared by William C. Lawrence Company for inclu-
sion in "SCAG -82 ". This forecast report is being considered now by the area
planning agency (SANBAG) to be forwarded to SCAG in their preparation of
regional totals for estimated growth. It is important that these regional
totals accurately reflect the City's projected growth because SCAG, in deal-
ing with the local communities, uses these totals for planning and funding
such matters as transportation, housing, sewer, water, and air quality.
The City has been asked to consider these estimates for SCAG purposes in
defining regional population and employment growth.
BACKGROUND: SCAG is in the midst of preparing a new regional population
and employment growth forecast, which is called "SCAG -82 ". In years past,
these forecast were prepared by SCAG and, in the case of Rancho Cucamonga,
did not accurately reflect our own population estimate. However, this
time the private consultant firm of William C. Lawrence Company was hired
to work with the local communities and the area planning agency for San
Bernardino County (SANBAG) in preparing a sub- regional total. This in-
formation is contained in the attached report. The population and employ-
ment forecast growth for the cities in the West End to the year 2000 are
shown on pages 2 and 3.
The population projections of the communities were based upon approved
projects and a projection of phasing of major projects such as specific
plans. The general assumptions and methodology used in preparing the
estimates are described on pages 5 and 6 of the attached report. Infor-
mation used by the consultant was obtained from the local communities
through a questionnaire as shown in Appendix V of this report and by con-
sulting with the City Staff. Considerable work was provided by the local
communities in helping the consultant prepare the estimates of the popu-
lation and employment growth. The numbers contained within this estimate
closely follow those as shown in our General Plan.
4v
Population and Employment Forecast
September 16, 1981
City Council
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider accepting
the estimated population and employment growth forecast prepared by William
C. Lawrence Company for inclusion in "SCAG -82 ".
Respectfully submitted,
1't' .r.:.�
�ACK LA'4, A. C.P. -
Director of Community Development
JL:TJB:jr
•
Attachment: RSA 28 Population And Employment Forecasts For Inclusion in •
"SCAG -82" And Area Transportation Planning
•
41
E
0
"
LA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 16, 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Annexation #4 to Landscape Maintenance District
#1 for Tracts 10569 and 9485 -1
Attached for Council's approval is a resolution ordering the work
in connection with Annexation 44 to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1 for Tracts 10569 and 9485 -1. Annexation to the Maintenance
District is a routine policy for all new tracts.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution
ordering the annexation of Tracts 19569 and 9485 -1 to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1.
ly sybmitted, "
LBIIYBK:jaa
Attachments
• RESOLUTION NO. V- I4l
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN
CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 4 TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR
TRACTS NO. 10569 AND 9584 -1.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did
on the 5th day of August, 1981, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.
81 -113 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation
Number 4 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of
Intention No. 81 -113 was duly and legally published in the time, form
and manner as required by law, shown by the affidvait of Publication of
said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk;
and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of
said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly
and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as
required by law, as appears from the affidavit of Posting said notices,
on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoptiogk
• of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning
real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in
said Resolution of Intention No. 81 -113, according to the names and
addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as
knrr:m to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said
copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by
law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing an file in the office of
�
the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in
this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work
and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having
now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work;
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the
Cit., of Rancng Cucamonga that. the public interest and convenience requires
the .rune <ation to the district and the ordering of the work, and Said
Cit; Co,wc ii hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in
said resolution of Intention No. 81 -113, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by
the Engineer fs hereby finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for
fiscal year 1981 -82 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report
are hereby approved.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1981.
q3
. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Engineer's Report for
ANNEXATION NO. 4
to the
Landscape Maintenance District Number 1
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. General Description
This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape
Maintenance District No. I. The City Council has determined that the
areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 9584 -1
and Tract No. 10569. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the
annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right of way or
easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
• The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared
by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans
for said Tract. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in
conformance with the Planning Commission conditions of approval of said Tract.
E
Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Maps and the assessment
diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and
specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the
same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
SECTION 4. Estimated Costs
No costs will he incurred for parkway improvement construction.
All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on data from
other cities, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is
estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal
thirty (S.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only,
actual assessment will be based on actual cost data.
) 4
The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 •
(including Annexation No. 4 comprised of 16,464 square feet of landscaped
area) is shorn below:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost
$.30 X 212,720 square feet = 63,816.00
Per Lot Annual Assessment
63,816.00 -. 1005 = 63.50
Per Lot Monthly Assessment = 5.29
Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and
the attached Assessment Diagram.
SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram
A copy of the propo=sed assessment diagram is attached to this
report and labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby
incorporated within the test of this report.
SECTION 6. Assessment
Improvement for Annexation No. 4 is found to be of general benefit .
to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for
each parcel.
The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1982, to
determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by
the City during the 1981/82 fiscal year which are to be recovered through
assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
SECTION 7. Order of Events
1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City
Engineer's report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District
and sets a public hearing date.
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony
and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the
City Council,
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing
and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
C,
I
Al�
0
•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
ANNEXATION NO. 4
I.
�-!I. T
T
IF-
"J 1.
4 1
a.
CITY 01' R A NiCI-10 CUCAN IONGA title' TRACT N0. 10569
1: NGI N 17 1: R I NG DIVISION
A
VICINITY INI• P
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
ANNEXATION NO. 4
CITY OF R A NO 10 CUC��.N to
NGA
A
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY NI AP
N
Exhibit A
0
J
9
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 10, 1981
TO: City Council
FROM: Harry J. Empey, Finance Director "
�_
SUBJECT: Refuse Rate Adjustment
Attached is a resolution reflecting the rate adjustment for residential refuse
collection as requested by Rancho and Yukon Disposal Services.
Please refer to the data supplied each Councilmember at the 9/2/81 meeting
for support information for the requested increase.
A new category has been added to the request, and that, as mentioned on 9/2/81,
is a differential rate north of Banyan and west of Milliken of $6.71 per month.
All other residential areas would be at $6.05 per month. Senior citizens,
as defined by resolution will be increased to $4.95 per month.
Members of the refuse companies will be present for the 9/16/81 meeting to
answer any questions Council may have.
Recommendation: In light of the position of the �ity to control a company's
margin of profit, careful consideration has been kiven to the refuse collection
industry's rising cost situation. In order to continue a high level of
professional service, it is recommended that a 10% increase be granted, and
a differential rate of $6.75 per month north of Banyan and west of Milliken
be set.
HJE:cam
Attachments
r�-F
0 RESOLUTION NO, 81 - 11Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REFUSE
COLLECTION RATES WHICH MAY BE CHARGED FOR REFUSE
COLLECTION FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: No refuse collector shall charge his residential
customers within the City in excess of the following for refuse collection
services.
(a) $6.05 per month per residential unit;
(b) $6.75 per month per residential unit north of Banyan and
west of Milliken;
(c) $4.95 per month per residential unit if the head of
household thereof is age 62 or over.
SECTION 2: The charges established by Section 1 are based upon
refuse being collected from the premises of such residential customers at least
once each calendar week.
SECTION 3: Resolution No. 81 -15 is hereby rescinded.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of September 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
0 Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
1?
0
0
W]
CITY OF RANCI IO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 10, 1981
TO: City Council
FROM: Harry J. Empey, Finance DirectL
SUBJECT: PERS Contract Amendment
Gentlemen, with the adoption of the attached ordinance, our business with the
State retirement system will be concluded - -at least as far as our latest
contract change is concerned.
To date, the City has filed a certification stating Council's desire to amend
the contract, and filed a certification of compliance with Government Code
Section 7507, which is a revelation as to costs. An employee election has
been held in which the employees overwhemingly selected to continue the process
as initiated. Following this, a resolution of intention has been filed, and
with the adoption of the attached ordinance, the check list will be complete.
(I hope.)
Also attached please find a copy of the amendment as it pertains to Rancho
Cucamonga. This amendment does spell out how our new contract will read.
Recommendation: To approve ordinance and set October 7, 1981 for second
reading.
HJE:cam
Attachments
5L)
ORDINANCE NO. IK. L.—
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL
AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: That an amendment to the contract between the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of Administration,
California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby authorized, a
copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A ", and by
such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.
SECTION 2: The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized,
empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said
agency.
SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days
after the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of thirty (30)
days from passage thereof, shall be published at least once in The Daily
Report, a newspaper of general circulation, circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in force and
effect.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
5(
AMENDMENT TO COVTRACT PENtEN THE
• BOARD OF ADMINISTRJ;i�rON
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIE�MFNT SYSTEM
AND THE ;
CITY COUNQe
OF THE•
CITY OF RANCHQ_-fUCAMONCA
The Board of Administration, PuolgcN'mployees' Retirement System, hereL.-
after referred to as Board, and the g65erning body of above public agency,
hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract
date of January 26, 1978, effective,'3aruary 28, 1978, and as amended e.
September 22, 1980, which provide slor participation of Public Agency in sill
System, Board and Public Agency hIe oy agree as follows:
Z
A. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are hereby stricken from said contract as execlil -I
effective September 22, 1980, and hereby replaced by the following U -7 -
graphs numbered 1 through 9 inclusive:
1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined tnerein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Norms! retirement age" sr.
mean age 60 for local miscellaneous members.
2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retiremen'
. System from and after January 28, 1978 making its employees as
hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provis :fl-.3
of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on
election of a contracting agency and are not provided for hereir.
to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except such as by
express provisions thereof apply only on the election of contr=.c•_'.F
agencies.
0
Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall be=o
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class ms
are excluded 'cy law or this agreement:
a. anployees other than lots' safety members therein refer^=! 'o ^.
lots' miscellaneous members).
In adcitinn to the clssses of employees excluded from memcersni[
3 sip 4eti re men: Law, the followillf, c asses of employees shn'. no'
'oeCim, me ^leers of sairi Retirement Syst °m:
NO ADDITIONAL FXCLUShNS
Th" fraction of finn: compensation to 'be, provided for seen year n"
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous mencIr
sr.gll be determined in accordancel with section 21251.1? of sain
Retirement Law 12'6 at age 60 Full).
IA
5. rme following additional provisions of the Public Employees' Retire-
_ ment Lux which apply only upon election of a contracting agency shall
apply to the Public Agency and its employees:
a. Section 20024.2 (One -year final compensation). •
b. Section 20930.3 (Military service credit) as defined in Chapter
830, Statutes of 1976. P
C. Section 21022.1 (Industrial {ability retirement) for local
miscellaneous members onlye,
*�h
d. Section 21298 (InereasQ_``ton- industrial disability allowance).
e. Sections 21380- 213 &t(�a,, `(41959 Survivors Program), excluding Section
21382.2 (Increasedjry59 Survivors benefits).
1�
f. Section 20614 ("statutes of 1978: reduction of normal member
contribution rate). From and after September 22, 1980, the
normal member contribution rate shall be -04-
n
� LP
g. Section\Z0614 (Statutes of 1980; to prospectively revoke Section
20614, Statutes of 1978).
6. Public Agency, in accordance with Section 20759.1 Government Code,
shall not be considered an "employer" for purposes of Chapter 6 of the
Public Employees' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency
shall be fixed and determined as provided in Section 20759, Government
Code, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board •
as provided in Section 20759, Government Code.
7. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
a. With respect to miscellaneous members, the agency shell con-
tribute the following percentages of monthly salaries earned as
miscellaneous members of said Retirement System:.
(1) 9.227 percent on account of the liability for current
service benefits.
(2) 0.11 percent on account of the liability for the 1950
Survivor Program.
'o. .A ressona'olo amount per annum, as fixed by the Board to cover th,,
costs of administering, said System as It affects the employees of
Puoli- Agency, not inc.uding the costs of srenial vnluations or
of the periodic investigation and valuations required by lnw.
C. A reason -ble amount as fixed by the Board, payable in one instill-
ment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valua-
tions on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the
periodic investlpation and valuations required by lax.
Ll
6�3
A. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall of
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Pun::
• Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under +r.l•
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation requited by said Retirement Law.
9. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall 'o�
paid oy Public Agency to the Retirement System within thirty days
after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as
may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the
correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper
adjustment shall oe made in connection with subsequent remittanco.,, �^
adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any
employee my be made by direct cash payments between the employee ann
the Board. Payments by Public Agency to Board may be made in the rl
of warrants, bank checks, bank drafts, certified checks, money oriers
or cash.
B. Thia amendment shall be attached to said contract ap'd shall be effective on
the day of —
V:
�_.Witness da y of 19 ess our hands the —
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE
CITY OF R&CHO CUCAMONGA
po
BY BY m
Carl J. Blechinger, Executive Officer Presidi Officer
-1
0
Approved as to farm/j: Attest:
tt: - °7 �k, eeni OC.`. Dote Clerk
54
c
c
C
(0
\J
4
RSA 28 POPULATION
AND EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS
FOR INCLUSION IN "SCAG -82"
P. "7 AREA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
prepared for:
San Bernardino Associated Governments
Wells Fargo Building
334 west Third Street, Suite 401
San Bernardino, California 92401
by:
William C. Lawrence Company
The Bradbury Building
304 South Broadway, Suite 444
Los Angeles, California 90013
(213) 617 -0588
August 1981
C
•
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Will-a,-. C. Lawrence Company (WCLC) wishes to acknowlecce
those lister below for their cooperation and assistance on
C work leading to the development of the following forecasts.
Without their cooperation, this product would not have been
possible.
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBA.G): Wes McDaniel,
Kerry Forsythe
c
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG): Jim
Dennis Macheski, Joel Kibbee
San Bernardino Countv: Kenneth Topping, Walter Ludwig,
Pon Matayas, Tim McFarland, Holly Boots,Virgil Hill
C
Git: of Chino: Harry Weinroth, Earl Nelson
C4tv of Fontana: George Brenner
• City of Montclair: Robert Clark, Jimmy Lai, Hal Frederickson
C
Cite of Ontario: Joyce Babicz, Gary Mitchell, Paul Warner
Cit-. of Rancho Cucamonca: Jack Lamm, Steve McCutchan, Barry
Hogan
City of Upland: William Young, Steve Kabel
The Planning Center: Brook White
C Any omissions or errors are WCLC's.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•
PACE
PURPOSE
1
JCFIS�ICTIONAL SE }14 -PY
S[: >C +c+RY PROJECTIONS TABLES)
1
GENERAL ASS::SPTIONS
5
METHODOLOGY
APPENDICES
8
I. Analysis Zone Map for RSA 2 8
9
II. City Sonere Peculation and Employment
PrOjC'CtionS - By AZ
A. C ^: ino
10
B. Fontana
12
C. Montclair
14
D. Ontario
16
E. Rancho Cucamonga
13
F. Upland
20
•
G. San Bernardino County
22
III. PS.-. 28 Analysis Zone Totals
A. Population
24
1
B. Employment
25
iV. PEA 28 Regional Analysis Zone Totals
A. AZ to PAZ Conversion Table
26
B. Population
27
C. Employment
28
V. Questionnaire for Local Jurisdictions
29
VI. Detailed Methodolou.
39
A. Population
39
B. Employment
40
VII. Documentation Materials Available at WCLC
42
VIII. Selected Bibliography
43
RSA. 28 POPULATION AND E):P LO1 ":EST FORECASTS
P7:RPOSE
T'nesc population and employment forecasts for the West End
of Sfin crnard*i ^.o County (RSA 28) were cenerated for San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SAN. >AG) by the William.
C. Lawrenc_. Coauany as an update to exictinc SLAG -78 pro-
jections. Detailed down to the city sphere and analysis zone
level, these projections are tailored to be used in traffic
model'inc stu4ics and as input into the development oz
82 forecasts,
J'J RIS�ICTIOi ;:,L 9jmnARY
The hest End (RSA 28) should expect rapid population and
e:3p'_ovment growth for the remainder of this century.
Popclation is projected to approximately double, from a
1960 Ccns::s base of 350,868, to our estimate of 704,100 in the
near 2000. This compares with a SCAG -78 2000 estimate of
500,000, and a SCAG -78(A) estimate of 590,000.
• Empioj'nent growth is projected to exceed population growth on
a oercentase basis. Our projections show a tripling of the
emoiov- ..e. ^.t base from a 1979 LARTS estimate of 106,575 to
338,000 by 2000. Our 2000 figure compares with a LARTS /SCAG -78
2000 projection of 208,000. This anticipated growth will not
be evenly distributed throughout the West End. Certain cities
and their surrounding spheres of influence will see rapid
er.oansion while others, which are largely built -out, will
grow relatively slowly and steadily. A brief look at the pro-
jected growth in each city sphere of influence follows. Tables
I and II summarize our population and employment forecasts
for west End city spheres.
Chino
By the mid- 1990's, residential land in the Chino Sphere
should be reaching a fairly well built -out state, thus
slowing its population growth. The type, space and extent of
development in the Chino Hills and the question of the ex-
tension of development into the agricultural /dairy lands to the
east (nCe: being studied) will affect development pressures in
Chino itself. our forecasts assume an 80' build -out of the
Chino Hills Specific Plan's high forecast by the year 2000
concomitant with the maintenance of the present agricultural
preserves.
-1-
6 TABLE I
6CLC POPULATION PR07ECTIONS FOR RSA 28
Sphere Su=mar,
C
C
C
L
i
RSA. 29 ;SLAG -62) 350,868
SCi,G -78 (A)
SCAG -78
1981
55,500
105,0002)
34,500
126,600
103,900
67,500
1995
63,500
135,000(2)
39,300
138,900
138,700
,2,200
2000
65,000
140,000`2)
41,500
145,801-
142,200
72,900
39,300 74,200 92,600
3,500 3,800 4,100
535,800 665,500 704,100
590,000
500,000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) City of Fontana forecast, provided to WCLC by George
Brenner, I•'ontana Planning Director.
-2-
•
•
•
1980
Sphl -'re
Census
CH ISO
45,993
FONTA.N:,(1)
65,357
MONTCLAIR
28,005
ONT RIO
88,876
RANCHO CGCAMONGF
55,301
UPLAND
50,631
SAN SE- NAP,CINO CO.
- CHINO HILLS
13,543
- OTHEF
UNSPHEREO
3,162
RSA. 29 ;SLAG -62) 350,868
SCi,G -78 (A)
SCAG -78
1981
55,500
105,0002)
34,500
126,600
103,900
67,500
1995
63,500
135,000(2)
39,300
138,900
138,700
,2,200
2000
65,000
140,000`2)
41,500
145,801-
142,200
72,900
39,300 74,200 92,600
3,500 3,800 4,100
535,800 665,500 704,100
590,000
500,000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) City of Fontana forecast, provided to WCLC by George
Brenner, I•'ontana Planning Director.
-2-
•
•
•
f
C
C
•
•
TABLE II
b:CLC EMPLOYMENT PROZECTIOSS FOR RS 28
Sphcre Sum_.ar%
1987
1979
So .are
LARTS
CHINO
7,160
FONTANA(1)
26,290
:;OSTCLAIR
7,480
G T•',R10
35, 040
RANCHO
85,480
CCCcJi0:; G.=
17, 590
61,980
10, 960
S F.S BERNAR.DISO CO.
17,450
- CHISO HILLS
1,300
- AGRICULTURAL
12,870
AREA
755
RSA 28 (2)
106,575
LARTS /SCS,G -78 (A)
(3)
LARTS /SCAG -78
1987
1995
2000
25,780
43,550
53,450
40,120
55,000
63,320
9,430
11,320
12,110
59,370
85,480
97,520
37,040
61,980
80,070
15,600
17,450
17,910
4,910
10,470
12,870
750
750
750
193,000
286,000
338,000
250,000
208.000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 2B boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
Fontana's totals also include the unsphered portions of
AZ's 210 and 229 (Kaiser Steel).
(2) PST. 28 employment totals are based on the following
em;�loyment. to population ratios: 1987 - .36; 1995 - .43;
2006 - .48.
(3) Assumes employment growth in SCAG -78(A) to be 42,000
over SCAG -78 for 2000, per SCAG's proposed figures.
-3-
Em; :o }'meat in the Chino Cit;• and Sphere should see rapid •
throne.- the year 2000. The rate of growth will
racain highly dependent on the industrial and commercial
gyo,.tn of other West End areas, however.
Fontana
Fontana is under significant development pressure. The
population is projected to double by 1995; growth slowing
sor-wi :at thereafter. Areas now under study, suer. as the
i',Iupa Hills (10,000 dwelling units), will have a signifi-
cant impact on the ultimate population, dependin:_: on the
anonnt of allowed development.
Similarly, employment growth is projected to be rapid and
stron_. As in Chino, growth here will be hichl% interactive
with tha rest of the West End.
DUntc: air
Largo tracts of land are becoming scarce in the Montclair
S'hero. Moderate population growth should continue, however,
to t -e mid- 1990's. Past 1995, population growth is projected
to slow to a trickle.
E-,ploymont growth is projected to increase at a slower pace •
than population. No major projects, at a scale of, say,
those in Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, or Fontana, exist in the
Montclair Sphere.
Ontario
Significant population growth is projected in the Ontario
Sphere by 2000 with the most rapid period of growth being
the 1980's. The final form of the Ontario International
Center and the outcome o` the General Plan Update on
residential /industrial land balance will be key factors affec-
ting ultimate population and employment.
Eased on current information, major employment growth is pro-
jected, with the employment base increasing from approximately
35,000 in 1979 to about 97,000 in 2000. Due to the number of
employment- generating projects already in the planning stage,
employment growth rates are projected to be highest in the
1980's, then slowing, relatively, toward the year 2000.
Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga is projected to have the largest population •
growth rates of any city in the West End. The surge of.
residential tract man filings following the lifting of their
-4-
f
• de:'elop -,ent mcratoreu-. in 1980 is continuing. 45,000 neoole
( are projacte5 to be in the planned co^ unities o` Victoria
and Terra Vista alone. The remaining large amount of vacant
lane'. s:: ^,ould absorb additional significant growth.
The Panc;:a Cucamonga Industrial Area is projected to support
r,ajnr en°acpmont growth. Overall development here is pro-
: �ecte5 to to slightly delayed conga red to development in Ontar'o, whirl:� sl:culd result in major growth throuc_h the
year 2000.
Uclar.c
?lost of Upland's population growth is projected to occur by
abo.;t 1998. By then, vacant residential land should be in
slnrt s❑ -plg, restricting additional growth..
En.::oyment arowth should follow population growth, increasing
cost rapid i ;: in the 1980's then falling off. No major indus-
trial pr_jects are anticipate::.
Se:; Fernardin� count•, - Chi nc Hills
• As stated in the Chino summary, our population projections for
C'nino Hills assume an 80% build -out by 2000 of the 44,700
m.a::imum. housinq units possible under the Draft Chino Hills
Sp.-_aific Pian. Contributin:: to this 803 by 2000 tiqure is the
assampticn that the most developable land and lane: closest to
Highway 71 will be built -out first. The most rapid growth is
prolected between 1980 and 1995.
E- .plo}�,ent growth projections for Chino Hills are tied to its
population growth phasing. Again, the most rapid growth is
projected to occur before 1993.
GENE 4L ASS17MPTIONS
The following general assumptions apply to the attached
pc;;'ulation and employment forecasts:
1. Economy - Moderately healthy and viable local,
regional and national economics through the year
2000. Availability of reasonable construction and
mortgage financing through cost of the remainder of
this century.
2. Infrastructure - Adequate funding from private
and public sources to provide the necessary
infrastructure, on a timely basis, to support the
projected growth. Such infrastructure includes
transportation systems, waste water treatment, flood
-5-
control, and public faciliti -s for schools, •
recreation, and police and fire protection.
Political Climate - Support and approval at
local, regional and state levels of government to
allow the projected levels of growth, i,e,,no
significant growth control meas.res over a
prolonged period of time.
Environment - Maintenance or improvement of
environmental quality, especially air quality,
at a level high enough not to significantly
discourage growth.
Disasters - No nitural or man - related disaster
5-t -a- scale large enought to disrupt the orderly
development of the area.
METHODOLOGY
The completion of our analyses first required that WCLC
research and update local jurisdictional and sphere of
influence boundaries, prepare a new West End basemap from
USGS maps, and construct a complete mapping overlay system •
for the West End. (See Appendix I, Analysis Zone Map of West
End.) In addition, Census Tract population data had to be
reallocated to match analysis zone (AZ) and city sphere
boundaries, The lack of consistency between AZ and city
sphere boundaries required additional work at a number of
points in the work effort.
The population projections in this study were generated using
a "bottom -up" methodology, relying heavily on input from local
jurisdictions and the private sector. Short term projections
were based on a survey of residential projects either filed
for, approved, or under construction. Longer term projections
rel }led on: 1) phasing for major projects and specific plans,
and 2) an analysis of local and regional estimates of future
land availability and absorption. (The questionnaire developed
by WCLC and distributed to local jurisdictions is attached as
Appendix V.)
Projections on the type and number of future housing units
were converted into population forecasts through an analysis
of future household size. Where major planned areas or
communities (e.g., Chino Hills or the Victoria Planned
Community in Rancho Cucamonga) had their own household size
forecast, that number was used in the generation of future
population data. Where such information was lacking, a house-
hold size factor of three persons per dwelling unit was •
used to generate population totals.
-6-
• Draft projections were presented on at least two occ -lions
to representatives of the involved local jurisdictions'
planning departments for their review and comment. Adjust-
ments based on their feedback are incorporated in our final
projections.
Our employment projections for the RSA (West End) as a whole
are based on both the projected growth in population and on
economic trends in the region. The employment -to- population
ratio, which was approximately .32 in 1979, is projected to
rise to .36 by 1987, .43 by 1995, and .48 by the year 2000.
Based on these ratios, and our population projections for
the target years, employment projections for the total RSA
were made.
In allocating employment growth to each city sphere, the per-
centage of the total RSA employment growth within each sphere
was estimated, based on LARTS /SCAG -78 forecasts, available com-
mercial and industrial land, and major long term plans under
consideration. A similar process was used in disaggregatinq
the city sphere totals down to the AZ level.
City sphere population and employment forecasts at the AZ level
are attached as Appendix II. Pure AZ totals, disregarding
• city spheres, are presented in Appendix III. Regional AZ
totals - aggregations of AZ totals - are presented in Appendix
IV.
A detailed outline of the methodology employed by WCLC in the
development of these forecasts may be found in Appendix VI.
DOCUMENTATION MATERIALS AND BIBLOGRAPHY
Documentation materials prepared by and /or available at
WCLC are listed in Appendix VII. A selected biblography for
this research may be found in Appendix VIII.
\J
-7-
c
c
•
•
APPENDICES
-8-
tf �R: a..�.d1 `f 5\ i :t"t`
Pfr1v� a'w• f ,;}� -
201
204
205 /
�\
20S
203
zob!
2
?
.-
t j
240
_
241 :
20B
J -
211
212 213
2I4
2 15
4 21��1
—
209
--
j
1'230
233
i
7
221
218; ,
''v
222
225
j
q
31T
232
1
223
.2L51
226
227
224
234
I 6
237
.
t
i.
ONES
2,3n
2 Z)/j
West End
ti
San Bernardino County
l
APPENCix
. CHINO SPHERE
{
C
Sphere
• Totals 45,993 55,500 63,500 65,000
•
-10-
1980
( A2
(partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
223
15,873
17,590
20,240
20,940
224
14,824
16,640
17,320
17,430
( 225
(p)
3,868
4,980
5,270
5,360
234
6,281
6,870
7,670
8,070
235
3,463
3,470
3,470
3,470
( 236
(p)
1,678
5,950
9,530
9,730
C
Sphere
• Totals 45,993 55,500 63,500 65,000
•
-10-
( APPENDIX II -A.2.
C CHINO SPHERE •
FAJ
-11-
i
1979
A2 (partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
223
1,600
4,540
7,340
8,900
224
2,300
2,860
3,400
3,700
225 (p)
0
240
470
600
234
1,950
16,630
30,650
38,450
235
610
650
680
700
236 (p)
700
860
1,010
1,100
Sphere
•
Totals
7,160
25,780
43,550
53,450
FAJ
-11-
i
(
APPENDIX II -B.i.
Sohore
Totals 65,357 105,000 135,000 140,000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) City of Fontana forecast, provided to NCLC by George
Brenner, Fontana Planning Director.
(3) Aggregation of Census block data to AZ's not completed
by City of Fontana.
-12-
FO7:7A:C ?. SPHERE
(1) !2)
(
POP,:LATION
1980
AZ (partial)
Census(3)
1987
1995
2000
(
205 (p)
150
1,150
2,550
206
8,400
12,400
14,000
207
8,000
9,000
11,000
(
210 (p)
3,000
3,000
3,000
211
6,058
9,750
13,250
13,250
212
8,200
10,300
10,300
(
213
25,000
26,400
26,400
229 (p)
1,500
2,500
2,500
230
5,945
6,000
7,000
7,000
:`.
•
231
11,000
15,000
15,000
232
4,000
12,000
12,000
233
20,000
23,000
23,000
Sohore
Totals 65,357 105,000 135,000 140,000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) City of Fontana forecast, provided to NCLC by George
Brenner, Fontana Planning Director.
(3) Aggregation of Census block data to AZ's not completed
by City of Fontana.
-12-
APPENDIX II -8.2.
FONTANA SPHERE (1)
c
•
Sphere
Totals 26,290 40,120 55,000 63,320
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) Includes County unsphered portion of AZ (Kaiser Steel).
-13-
0
1979
:,Z
(partial)
LARTS
1967
1995
2000
205
(p)
0
200
410
520
206
160
590
1,050
1,300
207
250
530
830
11000
210
(p)(2)
10,000
11,500
13,100
14,000
211
550
940
1,360
1,600
212
1,430
1,790
2,180
2,400
213
1,580
2,040
2,530
2,800
229
(p) (2)
7,400
10,600
14,070
16,000
230
650
1,530
2,470
3,000 •
231
500
5,090
10,030
12,800
232
370
940
1,550
1,900
233
i
3,400
4,370
5,420
6,000
Sphere
Totals 26,290 40,120 55,000 63,320
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) Includes County unsphered portion of AZ (Kaiser Steel).
-13-
0
APPENDIX II -C.1.
Y
%1C%T7LAIR SPHERE
POPULATION
1980
AZ
Census
1981
1995
2000
214
17,273
19,020
19,400
19,450
218
10,732
15,480
19,900
22,050
C
Sphere
Totals
28,005
34,500
39,300
41,500
3
1
•
-14-
C
I
C
L
C
APPENDIX II -C.2.
MONTCLAIR SPHERE
EMPLOYMENT
1979
Ay LARTS
214 4,100
218 3,380
Sphere
Totals 7,480
1987
1995
2000
5,180
6,120
6,440
4,250
5,200
5,670
9,430
11,320
12,110
-15-
•
•
C,
J
C
• ONT.ARIO SPHERE
C
POPOLATION
APPENDIX II -D.1.
•
Sphere
Totals 88,876 126,600 136,800 145,800
-16-
1980
AZ
(partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
208
(p)
29
3,000
6,000
9,400
209
(p)
0
0
0
0
210
(p)
0
0
0
0
215
17,067
20,100
20,600
21,100
216
3,751
3,900
4,000
4,100
217
(p)
19,387
26,600
27,200
27,800
219
3,703
3,800
3,900
4,000
220
1,393
1,500
1,600
1,700
.
221
6,468
7,900
8,300
8,700
222
1,828
1,800
1,800
11800
225
(p)
11,564
21,200
23,900
24,500
(
226
14,458
20,000
22,200
22,700
227
6,176
8,200
8,700
9,100
228
3,052
8,600
10,600
10,900
229
(p)
0
0
0
0
•
Sphere
Totals 88,876 126,600 136,800 145,800
-16-
APPENDIX II -D.2.
ONTARIO SPHERE
C
EMPLOYMENT
•
Sphere
Totals 35,040 59,370 85,480 97,520
•
-17-
1979
AZ
(partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
208
(p)
0
780
1,610
2,000
209
(p)
100
4,350
10,450
13,000
210
(p)
0
200
1,030
1,520
215
4,800
5,200
5,600
5,800
216
510
640
750
800
t 217
(p)
1,200
3,250
5,400
6,500
219
6,900
8,300
9,500
10,000
220
6,800
7,650
8,550
9,000
221
870
1,000
1,110
1,200 •
222
6,000
7,720
9,450
10,000
225
(p)
1,400
1,730
1,880
2,000
226
2,750
5,010
6,390
7,000
227
1,500
3,950
5,100
5,500
228
2,210
8,620
16,340
20,200
229
(p)
0
970
2,320
3,000
Sphere
Totals 35,040 59,370 85,480 97,520
•
-17-
APPENDIX II -E.1.
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPHERE
YOYULATION
1980
AZ (partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
202 (p)
3,705
4,450
4,490
4,500
203
33,202
48,410
50,010
50,460
( 204
4,494
19,610
42,750
43,850
205 (p)
1,732
6,520
14,120
15,880
208 (p)
10,429
22,990
25,300
25,. -Q
209 (p)
0
0
0
0
210 (p)
594
600
600
600
217 (p)
1,145
1,320
1,430
1,460
Sphere
Totals
55,301
103,900
138,700
142,200
. •
I
-18-
Sphere
Totals 17,590 37,040 61,980 80,070
A
-19-
•
I ,
L_J
APPENDIX
II -E.2.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SPHERE
•
(
EMPLOYMENT
1979
AZ (partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
202 (p)
0
100
140
140
203
3,500
5,850
6,850
7,500
(
204
2,190
3,290
4,090
4,830
205 (p)
150
750
1,850
2,750
208 (p)
6,000
10,000
14,500
17,500
(
209 (p)
1,400
8,200
18,700
25,500
210 (p)
4,200
7,700
12,200
16,200
217 (p)
150
1,150
3,650
5,650
Sphere
Totals 17,590 37,040 61,980 80,070
A
-19-
•
I ,
L_J
• POPULATION
APPENDIX II -F.1.
is
•
Sphere
Totals 50,731 67,500 72,200 72,900
-20-
1980
AZ (partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
201
12,193
22,170
22,480
22,680
202 (p)
8,100
10,430
11,230
11,280
240
23,309
25,690
26,870
26,970
( 241
7,129
9,210
11,620
11,970
is
•
Sphere
Totals 50,731 67,500 72,200 72,900
-20-
APPENDIX II -F.2.
UPLAND SPHERE .
l
EMPLOYMENT
•
-21-
6
1979
I AZ (partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
201
460
500
500
500
202 (p)
800
1,100
1,290
1,370
240
4,800
7,380
8,210
8,400
241
4,900
6,620
7,450
7,640
S
Sphere
Totals
10,960
15,600
17,450
17,910
•
-21-
6
f
C
(
0
APPENDIX II -G.1.
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
(areas not in spheres)
POPULATION
Sphere
Totals 16,705 42,800
_42_
78,000 96,700
1980
AZ
(partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
238
(Chinn
Hills)
13,543
39,300
74,200
92,600
210
(p)
20
0
0
0
229
(p)
10
0
0
0
236
(p)
1,087
1,200
1,300
1,400
237
783
900
1,000
1,100
239
1,262
1,400
1,500
1,600
Sphere
Totals 16,705 42,800
_42_
78,000 96,700
APPENDIX II -G.2.
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY •
(areas not in spheres)
(1) Included in Fontana Sphere totals,
•
-23-
1979
A2 (partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
238
(Chino Hills)
1,300
4,910
10,470
12,870
210(1)
-
-
-
-
224(1)
-
_
_
-
236 (p)
200
200
200
200
t
237
80
80
80
80
239
475
470
470
470
Sphere
•
Totals
2,055
5,660
11,220
13,620
(1) Included in Fontana Sphere totals,
•
-23-
APPENDIX III -A
RSA 2B ANALYSIS ZONE TOTALS
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
1980
AZ
Census
1987
1995
2000
201
12,193
22,170
22,480
22,680
202
11,805
14,880
15,720
15,780
203
33,202
48,410
50,010
50,460
204
4,494
19,610
42,750
43,850
205
n.a.
6,670
15,270
18,430
- 206
n.a.
8,400
12,400
14,000
207
n.a.
8,000
9,000
11,000
208
10,458
25,990
31,300
34,850
209
0
0
0
0
L 210
n.a.
3,600
3,600
3,600
211
6,058
9,750
13,250
13,250
212
n.a.
8,200
10,300
10,300
213
n.a.
25,000
26,400
26,400
214
17,273
19,020
19,400
19,450
215
17,067
20,100
20,600
21,100
. 216
3,751
3,900
4,000
4,100
217
20,532
27,920
28,630
29,260
218
10,732
15,480
19,900
22,050
219
3,703
3,800
3,900
4,000
220
1,393
1,500
1,600
1,700
221
6,466
7,900
8,300
8,700
222
1,828
1,800
1,800
1,800
223
15,873
17,590
20,240
20,940
224
14,824
16,640
17,320
17,430
225
15,432
26,180
29,170
29,860
226
14,458
20,000
22,200
22,700
227
6,176
8,200
8,700
9,100
228
3,052
8,600
10,600
10,900
229
n.a.
1,500
2,500
2,500
230
5,945
6,000
7,000
7,000
231
n.a.
11,000
15,000
15,000
232
n.a.
4,000
12,000
12,000
233
n.a.
20,000
23,000
23,000
234
6,287
6,870
7,760
8,070
235
3,463
3,470
3,470
3,470
236
2,765
7,150
10,830
11,130
237
783
900
1,000
1,000
23B
13,543
39,300
74,200
92,600
239
1,262
1,400
1,500
1,600
240
23,309
25,690
26,870
26,970
241
7,129
9,210
11,620
11,970
RSA 28
350,868
535,800
665,500
704,100
n.a. -
Not available due to
limited data
from City
of Fontana
-24-
APPENDIX III -B
RSA 28 ANALYSIS ZONE TOTALS •
EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS
1979
AZ LARTS 1987 1995 2000
201
460
500
500
500
202
800
1,200
1,430
1,510
203
3,500
5,850
6,850
7,500
204
2,190
3,290
4,090
4,830
205
150
950
2,260
3,270
206
160
590
1,050
1,300
207
250
530
830
1,000
208
6,000
10,780
16,110
19,500
209
1,500
12,550
29,150
38,500
210
14,200
19,400
26,330
31,720
211
550
940
1,360
1,600
212
1,430
1,790
2,180
2,400
213
1,580
2,040
2,530
2,800
214
4,100
5,180
6,120
6,440
215
4,800
5,200
5,600
5,800
216
217
510
1,350
640
4,400
7S0
9,050
800
12,150
•
218
3,380
4,250
5,200
5,670
219
6,900
8,300
9,500
10,000
220
6,800
7,650
8,550
9,000
221
870
1,000
1,110
1,200
222
6,000
7,720
9,450
10,000
223
1,600
4,540
7,340
8,900
224
2,300
2,860
3,400
3,700
225
1,400
1,970
2,350
2,600
226
2,750
5,010
6,390
7,000
227
1,500
3,950
5,100
5,500
228
2,210
6,620
16,340
20,200
229
7,400
11,570
16,390
19,000
230
650
1,530
2,470
3,000
231
500
5,090
10,030
12,800
232
370
940
1,550
1,900
233
3,400
4,370
5,420
6,000
234
1,950
16,630
30,650
38,450
235
610
650
680
700
236
900
1,060
1,210
1,300
237
80
80
80
80
238
1,300
4,910
10,470
12,870
239
475
470
470
470
240
4,800
7,380
8,210
8,400
241
4,900
6,620
7,450
7,640
•
RSA 28
106,575
193,000
286,000
338,000
-25-
C
C
C
•
•
APPENDIX IV -p
RAZ - AZ CONVERSION TABLE
RAZ A2-c in nL7
283
201,
202,
240,
241
284
203,
204,
208,
209, 217
285
205,
206,
210,
211
286
207,
212,
213
287
214,
218,
223
288
215,
216,
219,
220, 211
289
225,
226,
227
290
222,
228,
229
291
230,
231,
232,
223
292
224,
234,
235,
238
293
236,
237,
239
-26-
APPENDIX IV -B
_27_
•
•
•
RSA 28 RAZ TOTALS
C
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
1980
RAZ
Census
1987
1995
2000
283
54,436
71,950
76,690
77,400
284
68,686
121,930
152,690
158,420
285
n.a.
28,420
44,520
49,280
286
n.a.
41,200
45,700
47,700
287
43,878
52,090
59,540
62,440
288
32,382
37,200
38,400
39,600
289
36,066
54,380
60,070
61,660
290
n.a.
11,900
14,900
15,200
291
n.a.
41,000
57,000
57,000
292
38,117
66,280
102,660
121,570
293
2,045
9,450
13,330
13,830
RSA 28
350,868
535,800
665,500
704,100
n.a. -
Not available due to limited
data from
City of
Fontana.
_27_
•
•
•
APPENDIX IV -C
• RSA 28 RAZ TOTALS
EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS
•
-28-
1979
RAZ
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
283
10,960
15,700
17,590
18,050
284
14,540
36,870
65,250
82,480
285
15,060
21,880
31,000
37,890
286
3,260
4,360
5,540
6,200
287
9,080
13,970
18,660
21,010
288
19,880
22,790
25,510
26,800
289
5,650
10,930
13,840
15,100
290
15,610
27,910
42,180
49,200
• 291
4,920
11,930
19,470
23,700
292
6,160
25,050
45,200
55,720
293
1,455
1,610
1,760
1,850
RSA 28
106,575
193,000
286,000
338,000
•
-28-
C
C
APPENDIX V
•
Jurisdiction
ATTACHMENT I
RSA 28
C
POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
"UNCONSTRAINED" GROWTH - SCAG -82"
QUESTIONNAIRE
C
prepared for
SANBAG
Suite 401, 334 W. Third Street
San Bernardino, California 92401
prepared by
William C. Lawrence Company, Inc.
304 So. Broadway, Suite 444
Los Angeles, California 90013
(213) 617 -0588
•
-29-
r
•
I
Jurisdiction:
Unconstrained" SCAG -82 Forecasts
for RSA 28
The objective of this questionnaire is to develop new popula-
tion and employment forecasts for the six cities and the County
in the West End of San Bernardino County (RSA 28) for the years
1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000 by LARTS Transportation Analysis Zone
(AZ). The assumptions on which these forecasts are based are
set forth in the cover letter. The questionnaire is divided
into population and employment sections.
POPULATION
` 1. 1980 Preliminary Census Baseline
o PLEASE USE ATTACHMENT A TO FILL OUT PRELIMINARY CENSUS
RESULTS.
This effort will allow the detailed rg owth increments from
1980 to 2000 to be added to a correct baseline. An AZ map
for your jurisdiction is enclosed - see Attachment C.
2. Identifying Tract Location by AZ
i
Attachment B shows a listing of the tracts and their
respective developer that your staff provided to WCLC on
which the March, 1980 update was based.
o PLEASE IDENTIFY FOR EACH PROJECT THE AZ IN WHICH IT
LIES, BASED ON THE AZ MAP FOR YOUR JURISDICTION
(ATTACHMENT C)•
The result of this effort will be to disaggregate the
March, 1980 forecasts into AZS for transportation planning
purposes.
-30-
r
0
3. Identifvina New Proiect Information filed since March. 1980
The estimates resulting in the 90,000 additional increment
from 1980 to 1990 were based on tract information filed
with zone jurisdiction before March, 1980.
o PLEASE
o ALSO, PLEASE LIST OTHER TRACTS THAT HAVE EXPIRED SINCE
M RCH, 1980.
These efforts will identify the projects added to the inven-
tory of development since the WCLC update in March, 1980,
and purge other tracts that have expired.
4. Projecting General Plan Growth from 1990 to 2000
Because the project related inventory (2. and 3. above) can
be the basis for only 10 year projections, and because these •
forecasts run for 20 years, local forecasts for 1990 and
2000 are needed. The best estimate lies in comparing vacant
(undeveloped) land, the General Plan density, and the likely
time frame (1990 -1995, 1995 -2000) for development. If the
area is to be developed after 2000, do not include it.
o PLEASE COMPLETE ATTACHMENT E TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY.
EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS
The best estimates for 1980 to 2000 are LARTS data included as
Attachments II and III. This section of the questionnaire
is oriented to obtain any better information that your jurisdic-
tion has collected on employment. These questions relate to (1)
inventorying major residential or industrial projects that are
under construction or planned; (2) other employment forecasts
for your city and the methodology followed to arrive at them;
and (3) industrial and commercial areas in the General Plan.
-31-
•
!
1. Employment Generators Inventory
In order to project employment in the short term, Attach-
ment F has been prepared to facilitate data compilation for
development under construction or planned as of January 1,
! 1980.
o PLEASE FILL OUT ATTACHMENT F TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY.
This effort will result in a listing of current employment
generating projects proposed in which to evaluate present
( growth.
2. Other Employment Forecasts
o PLEF.SE IDENTIFY OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON EMPLOY-
MENT GROWTH IN YOUR JURISDICTION IN THE TABLE BELOW.
Stud' Date Author Subject
•
3. General Plan Commercial and Industrial Acreage
o PLEASE OUTLINE THE INDUSTRIAL ZONED LAND (I',
EACH AZ BY TYPE SEE ATTACHMENT G AND ANY PHASING PRO -
GR14,1 ARTICULATED IN THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THOSE ACRES.
-32-
TOTAL INDUSTRY Phasing (acres by increment)
AZ VACANT ACRES TYPE 85 -90 90 -95 95 -2000
This effort will result in an evaluation of the total
employment generation potential by AZ and related phasing
program, if one is applicable, for each AZ.
If questions should arise, can we contact you with regard to
this questionnaire?
Contact: Population:
Employment:
Prepared by:
Dat.:
-33-
Phone:
Phone:
0
•
•
c
•
U
Jurisdiction s Sphere:
ATTACHMENT A
1980 PRELIMINARY CENSUS - BASELINE
Population
AZ Preliminary Estimate
-34-
Jurisdiction S Sphere:
u
ATTACHMENT D
NEW TRACTS /PLANS FILED SINCE MARCH, 1980
IN JURISDICTION S SPHERE
TRACT DEVELOPER A2 LOCATION SIZE PHASING REMARKS
•
•
-35-
0
•
•
ATTACHMENT E
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
GROWTH INCREMENTS - 1990 -2000
VACANT RESIDENTIAL LAND
AZ 1990 -1995 1995 -2000
Acres Density Range Acres Density Range
-36-
J
ATTACHMENT F
EMPLOYMENT GENERATORS INVENTORY
Pending Development and Development Not Completed by 1/1/80.
Anticipated
Builder/ Type/ TAZ Commercial Sites Industrial Sites Employees
Applicant Description' Location (Net Acres) (Gross Acres) (if known)
*Industrial types and proposed employment generation factors: I.P.
G.I.
RS /GI
H.I.
Commercial types and proposed employment generation factors: L.C.
R. C.
O.C.
Other - specify
•
Completion Date
or Phasinq Info
Industrial Park 45 /gross acre
General Industrial 25 /gross acre
Rail Served G.I. 15 /gross acre
Heavy Industrial 10 /gross acre
Local Commercial 20 /net acre
Regional Commercial 17 /net acre
Office Commercial 70 /net acre
IL
0
ATTACHMENT G
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
( GROWTH INCREMENTS - 1990 -2000
c
is
11
VACANT COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL LAND
AZ 1990 -1995 1995 -2000
Acres Type Acres Type
i
-38-
I
APPENDIX VI •
Detailed Methodolog y
The following methodology was used for compiling the
( background information, the population forecasts, the
employment forecasts, and the final report:
BACKGROUND
1. Obtained population and employment forecast
( material from multiple sources.
2. Updated city and sphere boundary map for West End -
(RSA 28).
3. obtained Census Tract, Regional Analysis Zone
L (RAZ) and Analysis Zone (AZ) Maps from public
agencies and made transparent overlays for city
and sphere map.
4. Compiled questionnaire for distribution to local
jurisdictions (see Appendix V). .
POPULATION FORECASTS
1. C:lcc;:ed information on reasonable persons /household ratio.
2. Revised tract map data from previous forecasts
(1980) for updating by local jurisdictions.
3. Compiled tract map data provided by jurisdictions
for the period 1980 - 1990 by AZ and converted
to population.
4. Added household absorption potential of vacant and
infill acreage for period 1990 - 2000, considering
demand for residential product at allowed zoning,
and converted to population.
5. Aggregated 1980 Preliminary Census results to AZ
level from city data, for use as baseline.
6. Aggregated 3., 4., & 5. for each city and each AZ, and
phased growth over 1987, 1995, and 2000.
7. Graphed total and incremental growth for each
jurisdiction.
-39-
5;
• 8. Net with city and County planning directors to review
f preliminary results.
9. Revised AZ analysis per the localities' recommenda-
tions.
10. Coordinated process with SANBAG, SCAG, County, and
( 6 cities.
11. Net with planning directors to review and
gain approval of the product.
12. Prepared final draft package for submittal to special
( meeting of Planning Directors in Big Bear.
E.!PLOl'NEST FORECASTS
1.
Compiled all available market demand studies on in-
dustrial and commercial growth in the 5 County area.
...
Reviewed material for appropriate levels of
employment growth for San Bernardino /Riverside and
then the west 2nd.
3.
Disaggregated LARTS 1979 employment data by AZ into
•
city totals.
4.
For each city, compiled the following;
- employment generating projects by,intensity of
use,that were filed with each jurisdiction.
- vacant commercial and industrial zoned land.
- employment projections from various plans filed,
(such as the Ontario International Center, Vina
Vista, Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Park Plan)
-�
at build -out and for the year 2000.
5.
Evaluated appropriate relationship of employment
to population, using SCAG -78 ratios,and selected
.48 employment -to- population ratio for 2000; up
from .32 in 1980.
6.
Evaluated projects, plans, vacant land, and absorp-
tion rates by percentages,by city,and assigned a
'
percentage of the total employment growth for the
West End to each jurisdiction.
7.
Reviewed the methodology and assignment of percen-
tages with planning directors.
-40-
•
-41-
by to
•
1 8.
Multiplied that percentage total employment
obtain year 1980 - 2000 growth increment for each
jurisdiction.
9
Allocated that amount of growth to LARTS 1979 baseline
employment by AZ,for 1987, 1995, 2000,according to
projects filed, absorption plans for large scale
projects, vacant land, etc.
10.
Reviewed assumptions and methodology with SLAG and
SANDAG.
FINAL REPORT
1.
Aggregated city sphere AZ information for 1987, 1995,
2000,to total AZ.
2.
Aggregated total AZ information to PAZ for 1987,
1995, 2000.
3.
Summarized results by RSA and jurisdictions.
4.
Listed additional information sources.
5.
Compiled bibliography.
•
•
-41-
APPENDIX VII
•
DOCUMENTATION MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT WCLC
-42-
- Questionnaire Responses from Local Jurisdictions -
o
Filings for residential, commercial and
industrial projects.
o
Vacant land, by use and density category.
o
Commercial and industrial zoning.
o
Land absorption rates.
- Detailed
West End Employment Growth Analysis Package -
o
Orange County Industrial land Absorption.
o
Market Shares in Five - County Industrial Area.
o
Absorption of Industrial Land in Five- County
Area.
•
o
Market Area Industrial Land Absorption.
o
West End Industrial Acreage Absorption.
o
Industrial and Commercial Projects Summary -
By Sphere.
o
Filed Industrial and Commercial Projects -
By Sphere.
o
West End Employment Generation.
o
Employment -to- Population Ratio Analysis.
- West
End USGS Basemap System (at 1" = 1/2 mile) -
•
Basemap
•
Analysis Zone Overlay
•
Regional Analysis Zone Overlay
•
Major Development Projects and Studies Overlay.
•
Commercial and Industrial Zoning Overlay.
o
Rail and Highway System Overlay.
-42-
c
I
a
APPENDIX VIII
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
•
ACLC Population and Emplcyment Forecasting
Pest End, San Bernardino County
PROJECTIONS d FORECASTS
Arnold, Robert and Levy, Stephen. California Growth in the
1990's; Projections of Economic Regions of the State.
Palo Alto, Calif.: Center for Continuing Study c; the
California Economy, 1979.
Ki ^.bell, Larry J. Economic Growth in California: Prosnects
and Consequences. Los Angeles: UCLA Business Fore -
castung Project, May 1980.
Kimbell, Larry and Shulman, David. "Growth in California:
Prospects and Consequences," Public Affairs Report;
Sulleti.n of the Institute of Governmental Studies
(U.C. Berkeley), 21(5):1 -9, October 1980.
"Regional Economic Outlook; Southern California," Bank of
America News. Los Angeles: Bank of America, July •
1980.
SUD- REGI0NAL BACKGROUND
Annual Planning Information; Riverside -San Bernardino-
Ontario; Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area; 1980-
81. Los Angeles: Employment Development Department,
Southern California Employment Data and Research, May
1980.
Activities Report for 1979; Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga,
Ontario and Related Activities for Upland. San
Bernardino: San Bernardino County Economic Develop-
ment Department, 1979.
Labor Supply and Demand; Riverside and San Bernardino
Counties. Sacramento: California Employment Develop-
ment Department, Job Service, January-March 1981.
Newsletter. San Bernardino: San Bernardino County Economic
Development Department, 1978 -1980. Published quarterly.
Population Housing Bulletin. San Bernardino: San Bernar-
dino County Planning Department, January 1976 to April
1979. Includes 1975 Special Census Data. Three issues. •
-43-
i
• Real Estate and Construction Report, First Quarmer i,l
Fer: port Beach, Calif.: The Pulliam Lyon Compan
( 1980.
"Recional Economic outlook; Greater Riverside -San Bernar-
dino Report," Bank of America News (highlights).
Los Angeles, Bank of America, 1980.
( Residential Housing Summar }'• Riverside, volume 4. River-
side, Calif.: Calrfornia Land title Company, December
1980.
San Bernardino County. San Bernardino: San Bernardino
County Economic Development Department, September 1971.
( Pamphlet with inserts relating to business development.
LOCAL LEVEL BACKGROUND
Beiand /Associates, Inc. "Economic - Draft," in Ontario
( General Plan Update. Ontario, Calif.: City of Ontario,
1981.
Chino Hills Specific Plan Study - Draft. Newport Beach,
Cali:.: She Planning Center, EDA[t, Metcalf and Eddy,
• January 1981. Prepared for San Bernardino County.
_Chino Hills Specific Plan Study; Phase III Economic Report
(Elaboration of Economic Parameters). Newport Beach,
Calif.: T e Planning Center, i Prepared for
San Bernardino County.
( Draft EIP• Amendment 1 to Redevelopment Project No. 1;
Ontario Vintage Industrial Park. Ontario, Calif.:
Community Development Agency, November 1978. Prepared
for the Ontario Redevelopment Agency.
Draft General Plan: City of Rancho Cucamonga Executive
C Summ�rv. San Francisco: Sedway!Cooke, January 1981.
Prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
FISCOM; Computer Based Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis
Model. ll Summary along with MKGK Proposal,
February 1978. San Francisco, Calif.: Marshall Kaplan,
Gans and Kahn, 1980, Prepared for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Industrial Development Potentials in the Ontario Area, 1980-
2000. Addendum. Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.: Trinity
nevelopment Company, March 1979.
SLC
C
L.D. King and Co. Meredith: Ontario International Center •
! Specific Plan. Santa Ana, Calif.: L.D. King Company,
May 1981.
Ontario International Center Specific Plan. Irvine, Calif.:
Phillips, Brandt, Reddick, May 1981. Prepared for the
City of Ontario.
Rancho Cucamonga; City -Wide and Industrial Area Traffic
Study; Final Report. Oakland, Calif.: DKS Associates,
Marcie 1980. Prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Plan and Draft MR; Final
Draft. San Francisco, Calif.: Se way Cooke and DRS
Associates, January 1981. Prepared for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
Victoria Community Plan; Impacts on School Facilities City
o: Rancho Cucamonga. Newport Beach, Calif.: William
Lyon Company, December 1979. Prepared for WCLC.
-45-
•
•
•
9
C •
RSA 28 POPULATION
AND EM?LOYMENT FORECASTS
FOR INCLUSION IN "SCAG -82"
A,7:7 AREA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
prepared for:
San Bernardino Associated Governments
Wells Fargo Building
334 West Third Street, Suite 401
San Bernardino, California 92401
by:
C
William C. Lawrence Company
The Bradbury Building
304 South Broadway, Suite 444
Los Angeles, California 90013
` (213) 617 -0588
\J
August 1981
C
•
C
The William C. Lawrence Company (WCLC) wishes to acknowledge
those listed below for their cooperation and assistance on
C wort: leading to the development of the following forecasts.
Without their cooperation, this product would not have been
possible.
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG): Wes McDaniel,
Kerry Forsythe
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG): Jim
Simms, Dennis Macheski, Joel Kibbee
San Bernardino County: Kenneth Topping, Walter Ludwig,
Ron Matayas, Tim McFarland, Holly Boots,Virgil Hill
C
Cit• of Chino: Harry Weinroth, Earl Nelson
Cite of Fontana: George Brenner
C • City of Montclair: Robert Clark, Jimmy Lai, Hal Frederickson
Citv of Ontario: Joyce Babicz, Gary Mitchell, Paul Warner
Citv of Rancho Cucamonga: Jack Lamm, Steve McCutchan, Barry
Hogan
C City of Upland: William Young, Steve Kabel
The Planning Center: Brook White
C Any omissions or errors are WCLC's.
C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•
PAGE
c
PURPOSE
I
JURISDICTIONAL SUMMARY
(KITH SUM.AARY PROJECTIONS TABLES)
1
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
5
METHODOLOGY
6
APPENDICES
8
I. Analysis Zone Map for RSA 28
9
II. City Sphere Population and Employment
Projections - By AZ
A. Chino
10
B. Fontana
12
C. Montclair
14
D. Ontario
16
E. Rancho Cucamonga
in
F. Upland
20
L •
G. San Bernardino County
22
III. RSA 28 Analysis Zone Totals
A. Population
24
B. Employment
25
IV. RSA 28 Regional Analysis Zone Totals
A. AZ to RAZ Conversion Table
26
B. Population
27
C. Employment
28
V. Questionnaire for Local Jurisdictions
29
VI. Detailed Methodology
39
A. Population
39
B. Employment
40
VII. Documentation Materials Available at WCLC
42
VIII. Selected Bibliography
43
•
• RSA 28 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS
PURPOSE
These population and employment forecasts for the West End
of San Bernardino County (RSA 28) were generated for San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) by the William
C. Lawrence Company as an update to existing SCAG -78 pro-
jections. Detailed down to the city sphere and analysis zone
level, these projections are tailored to be used in traffic
mo-4elling studies and as input into the development of SCAG-
82 `forecasts.
JURISDICTIONAL SU,%DIARY
Tne hest End (RSA 28) should expect rapid population and
employment growth for the remainder of this century.
Population is projected to approximately double, from a
1980 Census base of 350,868, to our estimate of 704,100 in the
year 2000. This compares with a SCAG -78 2000 estimate of
500,000, and a SCAG -78(A) estimate of 590,000.
• Employment growth is projected to exceed population growth on
a percentace basis. Our projections show a tripling of the
employment'base from a 1979 LARTS estimate of 106,575 to
338,000 by 2000. Our 2000 figure compares with a LARTS /SCAG -78
2000 projection of 208,000. This anticipated growth will not
be evenly distributed throughout the west End. Certain cities
and their surrounding spheres of influence will see rapid
expansion while others, which are largely built -out, will
grow relatively slowly and steadily. A brief look at the pro-
jected growth in each city sphere of influence follows. Tables
I and II summarize our population and employment forecasts
for West End city spheres.
Chino
By the mid- 1990's, residential land in the Chino Sphere
should be reaching a fairly well built -out state, thus
slowing its population growth. The type, space and extent of
development in the Chino Hills and the question of the ex-
tension of development into the agricultural /dairy lands to the
east (now being studied) will affect development pressures in
Chino itself. Our forecasts assume an 80% build -out of the
Chino Hills Specific Plan's high forecast by the year 2000
concomitant with the maintenance of the present agricultural
preserves.
•
-1-
TABLE 1
C
WCLC POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR RSA 26
Sphere Sucanar,,
t
t
t
C
C
4
RSA 28 (SCAG -82) 350,668
SC.IG -78 (A.)
SCAG -78
1987
1980
Sphere
Census
CHINO
45,993
FONTANA(1)
65,357
MONTCLAIR
28,005
ONTARIO
86,876
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
55,301
UPLAND
50,631
SAN BERNARDINO CO.
142,200
- CHINO HILLS
13,543
- OTHER
39,300
UNSPHEREO
3,162
RSA 28 (SCAG -82) 350,668
SC.IG -78 (A.)
SCAG -78
1987
1995
2000
55,500
63,500
65,000
105,000(2)
135,000(2)
140,000(2)
34,500
39,300
41,500
126,600
138,800
145,800
103,900
138,700
142,200
67,500
72,200
72,900
39,300
74,200
92,600
3,500
3,800
4,100
535,600 665,500 704,100
590,000
500,000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) City of Fontana forecast, provided to WCLC by George
Brenner, Fontana Planning Director.
-2-
r1
lJ
•
•
•
C
TABLE II
EMPLOYb1ENT PROJECTIONS FOR RSA 2
Sphere Sumr„ary
RSA 28 (2) 106,575
LARTS /SCAG -78 (A) (3)
LARTS /SCAG -78
1987
1979
Sphere
LARTS
CHINO
7,160
FONTANA(1)
26,290
i10NTCLAIR
7,480
O::TARIO
35,040
R4NCH0
85,480
CUCAMONGA
17,590
UPLAND
10,960
SAN BERNARDINO CO.
17,450
- CHINO HILLS
1,300
- AGRICULTURAL
12,870
AREA
755
RSA 28 (2) 106,575
LARTS /SCAG -78 (A) (3)
LARTS /SCAG -78
1987
1995
2000
25,760
43,550
53,450
40,120
55,000
63,320
9,430
11,320
12,110
59,370
85,480
97,520
37,040
61,980
80,070
15,600
17,450
17,910
4,910
10,470
12,870
750
750
750
193,000
266,000
338,000
250,000
208,000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
Fontana's totals also include the unsphered portions of
AZ's 210 and 229 (Kaiser Steel).
(2) RSA. 28 employment totals are based on the following
employment to population ratios; 1987 - .36; 1995 - .43;
2000 - .48.
(3) Assumes employment growth in SCAG -78(A) to be 42,000
over SCAG -78 for 2000, per SCAG's proposed figures.
-3-
E-n'_o• :ment in the Chino City and Sphere should see rapid
•
growth through the year 2000. The rate of growth will
re -.ein highly dependent on the industrial and commercial
growth of other hest End areas, however.
Fontana
Fontana is under significant development pressure. The
population is projected to double by 1995; growth slowing
somewhat thereafter. Areas now under study, such as the
Juruua Hills (10,000 dwelling units), will have a signifi-
cant impact on the ultimate population, depending on the
anour.t of allowed development.
Similarly, employment growth is projected to be rapid and
st -ono. As in Chino, growth here will be highly interactive
with the rest of the West End.
Montclair
Larce tracts of land are becoming scarce in the Montclair
Sphere. Moderate population growth should continue, however,
to the mid- 1990's. Past 1995, population growth is projected
to slow to a trickle.
•
Employment growth is projected to increase at a slower pace
than population. No major projects, at a scale of, say,
those in Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, or Fontana, exist in the
Montclair Sphere.
Ontario
Significant population growth is projected in the Ontario
Sphere by 2000 with the most rapid period of growth being
the 1980's. The final form of the Ontario International
Center and the outcome of the General Plan Update on
residential /industrial land balance will be key factors affec-
ting ultimate population and employment.
Based on current information, major employment growth is pro-
jected, with the employment base increasing from approximately
35,000 in 1979 to about 97,000 in 2000. Due to the number of
employment generating projects already in the planning stage,
employment growth rates are projected to be highest in the
1980';, then slowing, relatively, toward the year 2000.
Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga is projected to have the largest population •
growth rates of any city in the West End. The surge of
residential tract map filings following the lifting of their
SO
• development moratoreum in 1980 is continuing. 45,000 people
( arc projected to be in the planned communities of Victoria
and Terra Vista alone. The remaining large amount of vacant
land should absorb additional significant growth.
The Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area is projected to support
major employment growth. Overall development here is pro-
jected to be slightly delayed compared to development in
0. tario, whirh should result in major growth through the
year 2000.
Upland
Most of Upland's population growth is projected to occur by
abo-: 1990. By then, vacant residential land should be in
short supply, restricting additional growth.
Employment growth should follow population growth, increasing
most rapidly in the 1980's then falling off. No major indus-
trial projects are anticipated.
San. Bernardino County - Chino Hills
• As stated in the Chino summary, our population projections for
Gino Hills assume an 80% build -out by 2000 of the 44,700
ma::imu�. housing units possible under the Draft Chino Hills
Specific Plan. Contributing to this 80% by 2000 figure is the
assumption that the most developable land and land closest to
Hrchwav 71 will be built -out first. The most rapid growth is
pro) cc ted between 1980 and 1995.
Employment growth projections for Chino Hills are tied to its
population growth phasing. Again, the most rapid growth is
projected to occur before 1995.
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
The following general assumptions apply to the attached
population and employment forecasts:
1. Economy - Moderately healthy and viable local,
regional and national economies through the year
2000. Availability of reasonable construction and
mortgage financing through most of the remainder of
this century.
2. Infrastructure - Adequate funding from private
and public sources to provide the necessary
® infrastructure, on a timely basis, to support the
projected growth. Such infrastructure includes
transportation systems, waste water treatment, flood
-5-
control, and public facilities for schools, •
recreation, and police and fire protection.
Political Climate - Support and approval at
local, regional and state levels of government to
allow the projected levels of growth, i.e,.no
significant growth control measures over a
prolonged period of time.
Environment - Maintenance or improvement of
environmental quality, especially air quality,
at a level high enough not to significantly
discourage growth.
Disasters - No natural or man - related disaster
at a scale large enought to disrupt the orderly
development of the area.
METHODOLOGY
The completion of our analyses first required that WCLC
research and update local jurisdictional and sphere of
influence boundaries, prepare a new West End basemap from
USGS maps, and construct a complete mapping overlay system •
for the Best End. (See Appendix I, Analysis Zone Map of West
End,) In addition, Census Tract population data had to be
reallocated to match analysis zone (AZ) and city sphere
boundaries. The lack of consistency between AZ and city
sphere boundaries required additional work at a number of
points in the work effort.
The population projections in this study were generated using
a "bottom up" methodology, relying heavily on input from local
jurisdictions and the private sector. Short term projections
were based on a survey of residential projects either filed
for, approved, or under construction. Longer term projections
relyed on: 1) phasing for major projects and specific plans,
and 2) an analysis of local and regional estimates of future
land availability and absorption. (The questionnaire developed
by WCLC and distributed to local jurisdictions is attached as
Appendix V.)
Projections on the type and number of future housing units
were converted into population forecasts through an analysis
of future household size. Where major planned areas or
communities (e.g., Chino Hills or the Victoria Planned
community in Rancho Cucamonga) had their own household size
forecast, that number was used in the generation of future
population data. Where such information was lacking, a house-
hold size factor of three persons per dwelling unit was •
used to generate population totals.
-6-
f • Draft projections were presented on at least two occasions
to representatives of the involved local jurisdictions'
planning departments for their review and comment. Adjust-
ments based on their feedback are incorporated in our final
projections.
Our employment projections for the RSA (Nest End) as a whole
are based on both the projected growth in population and on
economic trends in the region. The employment -to- population
ratio, which was approximately .32 in 1979, is projected to
rise to .36 by 1987, .43 by 1995, and .48 by the year 2000.
Based on these ratios, and our population projections for
the target years, employment projections for the total RSA
were made.
In allocating employment growth to each city sphere, the per-
centage of the total RSA employment growth within each sphere
was estimated, based on LARTS /SCAG -78 forecasts, available com-
mercial and industrial land, and major long term plans under
consideration. A similar process was used in disaggregatinq
the city sphere totals down to the AZ level.
City sphere population and employment forecasts at the AZ level
are attached as Appendix II. Pure AZ totals, disregarding
• city spheres, are presented in Appendix III. Regional AZ
totals - aggregations of AZ totals - are presented in Appendix
IV.
A detailed outline of the methodology employed by WCLC in the
development of these forecasts may be found in Appendix VI.
DOCUMENTATION MATERIALS AND BIBLOGRAPHY
Documentation materials prepared by and /or available at
WCLC are listed in Appendix VII. A selected biblography for
this research may be found in Appendix VIII.
L
-7-
•
0
APPENDICES
-8-
201 204 205
. Ja
202 203 206
j� 240
241 205 209 10 211 212i3�j
214 215 2.. L_ - - - 230 233, L :
_. ,'•.,. :k + -;,',. 221' • �J -
222
225 228 2fq- 231 232L
226 ?
22 2�
3 224
` 234 1 756 23) -
n`Y,
ANALYSIS ZONES
'3 West End
I San Bernardino County
• • �N h
APPENDIX.
(
40
'UD
•
CCd_7.., C ..
r
�oP •: - -IOC.
1980
AZ (partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
(
223
15,873
17,590
70,240
20,990
224
14,824
16,640
17,320
17,430
(
225 !p)
3,866
4,980
5,270
5,360
234
6,287
6,870
7,670
8,070
235
3,463
3,470
3,470
3,470
236 (-p)
1,67,8
5,950
9,530
9,730
Sn: ^. e:-e
•
T.3ta a
45,993
55,500
63,500
65,000
(
40
'UD
APPENDIX II -A.2,
•
CHINO SPHERE
Sphere .
Totals 7,160 25,780 43,550 53,450
C,
J
-11-
1979
AZ
(partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
223
1,600
4,540
7,340
8,900
224
2,300
2,860
3,400
3,700
225
(p)
0
240
470
600
234
1,950
16,630
30,650
38,450
235
610
650
680
700
236
(p)
700
860
1,010
1,100
Sphere .
Totals 7,160 25,780 43,550 53,450
C,
J
-11-
APPENDIX II -8.1.
r
•
FONT-NA SPHE.E
(1) (2)
PO ?CLATION
-
1980
AZ (partial)
Census(3)
1987
1995
2000
(
205 (p)
150
1,150
2,550
206
8,400
12,400
1:,000
207
8,000
9,000
11,000
(
210 (p)
3,000
3,000
3,000
211
6,058
9,750
13,250
13,2n0
212
8,200
10,300
10,300
'(
2_3
25,000
26,400
26,400
229 (p)
1,50J
2,300
2,500
230
5,945
6,000
7,000
7,000
;, •
231
11,000
15,000
15,000
232
4,000
12,000
12,000
233
20,000
23,000
23,000
Sphere
Totals 65,357 105,000 135,000 140,000
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) City of Fontana forecast, provided to WCLC by George
Brenner, Fontana Planning Director.
• (3) Aggregation of Census block data to AZ's not completed
by City of Fontana.
-12-
C
APPENDIX
II -B.2.
FONT:\.; SPHERE
(l)
•
EMPLOYMENT
1979
AZ (partial)
LASTS
198?
1995
2000
C
205 (n)
0
200
410
520
206
160
590
1,050
1,300
207
250
530
830
1,000
210 (p) (2)
10,000
11,500
13,100
14,000
211
550
940
1,360
1,600
C
212
1,430
1,790
2,180
2,400
213
1,580
2,040
2,530
.2,800
229 (p) (2)
7,400
10,600
14,070
16,000
230
650
1,530
2,470
3,000
•
231
500
5,090
10,030
12,800
2332
370
940
1,550
1,900
233
3,400
4,370
5,420
6,000
Sphere
Totals 26,290 40,120 55,000 63,320
(1) In order to conform to RSA 28 boundaries, Fontana Sphere
totals include that portion of RSA 28 in Rialto Sphere
and exclude that portion of Fontana Sphere in RSA 29.
(2) Includes County unsphered portion of AZ (Kaiser Steel).
-13-
n
U
APPENDIX II -C.1.
MONTCLAIR SPHERE
POPCLdTIOS
0
C
C
•
r
-14-
1980
AZ
Census
1987
1995
2000
214
17,273
19,020
19,400
19,450
218
10,732
15,480
19,900
22,050
Sphere
Totals
28,005
34,500
39,300
41,500
0
C
C
•
r
-14-
C
MONTCLAIR SPHERE
EMPLOYMENT
APPENDIX II -C.2.
C
C
-15-
•
•
0
1979
A2
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
214
4,100
5,180
6,120
6,440
218
3,380
4,250
5,200
5,670
Sphere
Totals
7,480
9,430
11,320
12,110
f
C
C
-15-
•
•
0
Sphere
Totals 88,876 126,600 138,800 145,800
-16-
APPENDIX
II -D.1.
•
ONTARIO SPHERE
POPULATION
1980
AZ
(partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
208
(p)
29
3,000
6,000
9,400
209
(p)
0
0
0
0
210
(p)
0
0
0
0
215
17,067
20,100
20,600
21,100
216
3,751
3,900
4,000
4,100
t
217
(p)
19,387
26,600
27,200
27,800
219
3,703
3,800
3,900
4,000
220
1,393
1,500
1,600
1,700
•
221
6,468
7,900
8,300
8,700
222
1,828
1,800
1,800
1,800
225
(p)
11,564
21,200
23,900
24,500
226
14,458
20,000
22,200
22,700
227
6,176
8,200
8,700
9,100
228
3,052
8,600
10,600
10,900
229
(p)
0
0
0
0
Sphere
Totals 88,876 126,600 138,800 145,800
-16-
APPENDIX II -D.2.
ONTARIO SPHERE •
EMPLOYMENT
Sphere
Totals 35,040 59,370 85,480 97,520
-17-
1979
AZ
(partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
208
(P)
0
780
1,610
2,000
209
(p)
100
4,350
10,450
13,000
210
(p)
0
200
1,030
1,520
215
4,800
5,200
5,600
5,800
216
510
640
750
800
= 217
(p)
1,200
3,250
5,400
6,500
219
6,900
8,300
9,500
10,000
220
6,800
7,650
8,550
9,000
221
870
1,000
1,110
1,200 •
222
6,000
7,720
9,450
10,000
225
(p)
1,400
1,730
1,880
2,000
�( 226
2,750
5,010
6,390
7,000
227
1,500
3,950
5,100
5,500
228
2,210
8,620
16,340
20,200
;( 229
(p)
0
970
2,320
3,000
Sphere
Totals 35,040 59,370 85,480 97,520
-17-
APPENDIX II -E.1.
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPHERE
-18-
1980
AZ (partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
202 (p)
3,705
4,450
4,490
4,500
203
33,202
48,410
50,010
50,460
l 204
4,494
19,610
42,750
43,850
205 (p)
1,732
6,520
14,120
15,880
208 (p)
10,429
22,990
25,300
25,450
t 209 (p)
0
0
0
0
210 (p)
594
600
600
600
217 (p)
1,145
1,320
1,430
1,460
•
Sphere
Totals
55,301
103,900
138,700
142,200
-18-
RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPHERE
C EMPLOYMENT
APPENDIX II -E.2.
1979
AZ
(partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
202
(p)
0
100
140
140
203
3,500
5,850
6,850
7,500
C 204
2,190
3,290
4,090
4,830
205
(p)
150
750
1,850
2,750
208
(p)
6,000
10,000
14,500
17,500
f 209
(p)
1,400
8,200
18,700
25,500
210
(p)
4,200
7,700
12,200
16,200
217
(p)
150
1,150
3,650
5,650
Sphere
Totals 17,590 37,040 61,980 80,070
is
is
•
J
• POPULATION
APPENDIX II -F.1.
1980
AZ (partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
t 201
12,193
22,170
22,480
22,680
202 (p)
8,100
10,430
11,230
11,280
240
23,309
25,690
26,870
26,970
241
7,129
9,210
11,620
11,970
•
•
Sphere
Totals 50,731 67,500 72,200 72,900
-20-
f
APPENDIX II -F.2.
UPLAND SPHERE
•
EMPLOYMENT
1979
f AZ (partial)
LART5
1987
1995
2000
201
460
500
500
500
202 (p)
800
1,100
1,290
1,370
240
4,800
7,380
8,210
8,400
241
4,900
6,620
7,450
7,640
i
Sphere
Totals 10,960 15,600 17,450 17,910
C
-21-
•
APPENDIX II -G.I.
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
(areas not in spheres)
POPULATION
_22_
1980
AZ (partial)
Census
1987
1995
2000
238
(Chino Hills)
13,543
39,300
74,200
92,600
210 (p)
20
0
0
0
229 (p)
10
0
0
0
236 (p)
1,087
1,200
1,300
1,400
237
783
900
1,000
1,100
239
1,262
1,400
1,500
1,600
Sphere
Totals
16,705
42,800
78,000
96,700
_22_
APPENDIX II -G.2.
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY
•
(areas not in
spheres)
EMPLOYMENT
1979
AZ (partial)
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
238
(Chino Hills)
1,300
4,910
10,470
12,870
210 (1)
_
_
229(1)
-
-
-
236 (p)
200
200
200
200
I 237
80
80
80
80
239
475
470
470
470
•
Sphere
Totals
2,055
5,660
11,220
13,620
(1) Included in Fontana Sphere totals.
-23-
•
APPENDIX III -A
• RSA 28 ANALYSIS ZONE TOTALS
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
1980
AZ Census 1987 1995 2000
201
12,193
22,170
22,480
22,680
202
11,805
14,880
15,720
15,780
203
33,202
48,410
50,010
50,460
204
4,494
19,610
42,750
43,850
205
n.a.
6,670
15,270
18,430
206
n.a.
8,400
12,400
14,000
207
n.a.
8,000
9,000
11,000
208
10,458
25,990
31,300
34,850
209
0
0
0
0
I 210
n.a.
3,600
3,600
3,600
211
6,058
9,750
13,250
13,250
212
n.a.
8,200
10,300
10,300
213
n.a.
25,000
26,400
26,400
214
17,273
19,020
19,400
19,450
215
17,067
20,100
20,600
21,100
• 216
3,751
3,900
4,000
4,100
217
20,532
27,920
28,630
29,260
218
10,732
15,480
19,900
22,050
219
3,703
3,800
3,900
4,000
220
1,393
1,500
1,600
1,700
221
6,468
7,900
8,300
8,700
222
1,828
1,800
1,800
1,800
223
15,873
17,550
20,240
20,940
224
14,624
16,640
17,320
17,430
225
15,432
26,180
29,170
29,860
226
14,458
20,000
22,200
22,700
227
6,176
8,200
8,700
9,100
228
3,052
8,600
10,600
10,900
229
n.a.
1,500
2,500
2,500
230
5,945
6,000
7,000
7,000
231
n.a.
11,000
15,000
15,000
' 232
n.a.
4,000
12,000
12,000
233
n.a.
20,000
23,000
23,000
234
6,287
6,870
7,760
8,070
235
3,463
3,470
3,470
3,470
236
2,765
7,150
10,830
11,130
237
783
900
1,000
1,000
238
13,543
39,300
74,200
92,600
239
1,262
1,400
1,500
1,600
240
23,309
25,690
26,870
26,970
• 241
7,129
9,210
11,620
11,970
RSA 28
350,868
535,800
665,500
704,100
n.a. -
Not available due to
limited data
from City
of Fontana
-24-
APPENDIX III -B
RSA 28 ANALYSIS ZONE TOTALS •
EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS
1979
AZ LARTS 1987 1995 2000
201
460
500
500
500
202
800
1,200
1,430
1,510
203
3,500
5,850
6,850
7,500
204
2,190
3,290
4,090
4,830
205
150
950
2,260
3,270
206
160
590
1,050
1,300
207
250
530
830
1,000
208
6,000
10,780
16,110
19,500
209
1,500
12,550
29,150
38,500
210
14,200
19,400
26,330
31,720
211
550
940
1,360
1,600
212
1,430
1,790
2,180
2,400
213
1,580
2,040
2,530
2,800
214
4,100
5,180
6,120
6,440
215
4,800
5,200
5,600
5,800
216
217
510
1,350
640
4,400
750
9,050
800 •
12,150
218
3,380
4,250
5,200
5,670
219
6,900
8,300
9,500
10,000
220
6,800
7,650
8,550
9,000
221
870
1,000
1,110
1,200
222
6,000
7,720
9,450
10,000
223
1,600
4,540
7,340
8,900
224
2,300
2,850
3,400
3,700
225
1,400
1,970
2,350
2,600
226
2,750
5,010
6,390
7,000
227
1,500
3,950
5,100
5,500
228
2,210
8,620
16,340
20,200
229
7,400
11,570
16,390
19,000
230
650
1,530
2,470
3,000
231
500
5,090
10,030
12,800
232
370
940
1,550
1,900
233
3,400
4,370
5,420
6,000
234
1,950
16,630
30,650
38,450
235
610
650
680
700
236
900
1,060
1,210
1,300
237
80
80
80
80
238
1,300
4,910
10,470
12,870
239
475
470
470
470
240
4,800
7,380
8,210
8,400
241
4,900
6,620
7,450
7,640
•
RSA 28
106,575
193,000
286,000
338,000
-25-
APPENDIX IV -A
-26-
•
(
RAZ
- AZ COA^7ERSION TABLE
RAZ
AZ's
in RAZ
(
283
201,
202, 240,
241
284
203,
204, 20B,
209, 217
285
205,
206, 210,
211
(
286
207,
212, 213
287
214,
218, 223
288
215,
216, 219,
220, 211
(
289
225,
226, 227
290
222,
228, 229
291
230,
231, 232,
223
•
292
224,
234, 235,
238
293
236,
237, 239
-26-
APPENDIX IV -R
RSA 28 RAZ TOTALS
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
C
n.a. - Not available due to limited data from City of
Fontana.
-27-
•
1980
RAZ
Census
1987
1995
2000
283
54,436
71,950
76,690
77,400
284
68,686
121,930
152,690
158,420
285
n.a.
28,420
44,520
49,280
286
n.a.
41,200
45,700
47,700
267
43,878
52,090
59,540
62,440
1 288
32,382
37,200
38,400
39,600
289
36,066
54,380
60,070
61,660
290
n.a.
11,900
14,900
15,200
291
n.a.
41,000
57,000
57,000 •
292
38,117
66,280
102,660
121,570
293
2,045
9,450
13,330
13,830
RSA 28
350,868
535,800
665,500
704,100
C
n.a. - Not available due to limited data from City of
Fontana.
-27-
•
APPENDIX IV -C
• RSA 28 RAZ TOTALS
EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS
•
-28-
1979
RAZ
LARTS
1987
1995
2000
283
10,960
15,700
17,590
18,050
284
14,540
36,870
65,250
82,480
285
15,060
21,880
31,000
37,890
286
3,260
4,360
5,540
6,200
287
9,080
13,970
18,660
21,010
288
19,880
22,790
25,510
26,800
289
5,650
10,930
13,840
15,100
290
15,610
27,910
42,180
49,200
• 291
4,920
11,930
19,470
23,700
292
6,160
25,050
45,200
55,720
293
1,455
1,610
1,760
1,850
RSA 28
106,575
193,000
286,000
338,000
•
-28-
I
APPENDIX l%
Jurisdiction:
ATTACHMENT I
RSA 28
POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
"UNCONSTRAINED" GROWTH - SCAG -82"
QUESTIONNAIRE
prepared for
SANBAG
Suite 401, 334 W. Third Street
San Bernardino, California 92401
prepared by
William C. Lawrence Company, Inc.
304 So. Broadway, Suite 444
Los Angeles, California 90013
(213) 617 -0588
-29-
•
•
r
I
Jurisdiction:
Unconstrained" SCAG -82 Forecasts
for RSA 28
INTRODUCTION
The objective of this questionnaire is to develop new popula-
tion and employment forecasts for the six cities and the County
in the West End of San Bernardino County (RBA 28) for the years
1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000 by LARTS Transportation Analysis Zone
(AZ). The assumptions on which these forecasts are based are
set forth in the cover letter. The questionnaire is divided
into population and employment sections.
• POPULATION
1. 1980 Preliminary Census Baseline
0 PLEASE USE ATTACHMENT A TO FILL OUT PRELIMINARY CENSUS
RESULTS.
This effort will allow the detailed rg owth increments from
1980 to 2000 to be added to a correct baseline. An AZ map
for your jurisdiction is enclosed - see Attachment C.
2. Identifying Tract Location by AZ
i
Attachment B shows a listing of the tracts and their
respective developer that your staff provided to WCLC on
which the March, 1980 update was based.
41
o PLEASE IDENTIFY FOR EACH PROJECT THE AZ IN WHICH IT
LIES, BASED ON THE AZ MAP FOR YOUR JURISDICTION
(ATTACHMENT C).
The result of this effort will be to disaggregate the
March, 1980 forecasts into AZS for transportation planning
purposes.
-30-
0
Identifyinc New Project Information filed since Mazch, 1980
The estimates resulting in the 90,000 additional increment
from 1980 to 1990 were based on tract information filed
with zone jurisdiction before March, 1980.
LIST ON THE SHEET PROVIDED
o ALSO, PLEASE LIST OTHER TRACTS THAT HAVE EXPIRED SINCE
bIARCH, 1980.
These efforts will identify the projects added to the inven-
tory of development since the WCLC update in March, 1980,
and purge other tracts that have expired.
Projecting General Plan Growth from 1990 to 2000
Because the project related inventory (2. and 3. above) can
be the basis for only 10 year projections, and because these •
forecasts run for 20 years, local forecasts for 1990 and
2000 are needed. The best estimate lies in comparing vacant
(undeveloped) land, the General Plan density, and the likely
time frame (1990 -1995, 1995 -2000) for development. If the
area is to be developed after 2000, do not include it.
o PLEASE COMPLETE ATTACHMENT E TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY.
EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS
The best estimates for 1980 to 2000 are LARTS data included as
Attachments II and III. This section of the questionnaire
is oriented to obtain any better information that your jurisdic-
tion has collected on employment. These euestions relate to (1)
inventorying major residential or industrial projects that are
under construction or planned; (2) other employment forecasts
for your city and the methodology followed to arrive at them;
and (3) industrial and commercial areas in the General Plan.
•
-31-
c
1. Employment Generators Inventory
In order to project employment in the short term, Attach-
ment F has been prepared to facilitate data compilation for
development under construction or planned as of January 1,
1980.
o PLEASE FILL OUT ATTACHMENT F TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY.
This effort will result in a listing of current employment
generatina projects proposed in which to evaluate present
C growth.
2. Other Employment Forecasts
l o PLEASE IDENTIFY OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON EMPLOY -
MENT GROWTH L: YOUR JURISDICTION IN THE TABLE BELOYJ.
Study Date Author Subject
•
•
3. General Plan Commercial and Industrial Acreage
o PLEASE OUTLINE THE INDUSTRIAL ZONED LAND (IN PURPLE) AND
-32-
tl
C
C
TOTAL INDUSTRY Phasing (acres by increment)
AZ VACANT ACRES rYPE 85 -90 90 -95 95 -2000
This effort will result in an evaluation of the total
employment generation potential by AZ and related phasing
program, if one is applicable, for each AZ.
I£ questions should arise, can we contact you with regard to
this questionnaire?
Contact: Population:
Employment:
Prepared by:
Date:
-33-
Phone:
Phone:
lI
•
•
c
•
•
Jurisdiction 5 Sphere:
ATTACHMENT A
1980 PRELIMINARY CENSUS - BASELINE
Population
AZ Preliminary Estimate
-34-
Jurisdiction & Sphere:
C •
L
ATTArUMPT3T n
NEW TRACTS /PLANS FILED SINCE MARCH, 1980
IN JURISDICTION & SPHERE
TRACT DEVELOPER AZ LOCATION SIZE PHASING REMARKS
-35-
•
•
•
ATTACHMENT E
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
GROWTH INCREMENTS - 1990 -2000
VACANT RESIDENTIAL LAND
AZ 1990 -1995 1995 -2000
Acres Density Range Acres Density Range
-36-
J
ATTACHMENT F
EMPLOYMENT GENERATORS INVENTORY
Pending Development and Development Not Completed by 1 /l /00.
Anticipated
Builder/ Type/ TAZ Commercial Sites Industrial Sites Employees
Applicant Description* Location (Net Acres) ((Puss Acre,) (if known)
*Industrial types and proposed employment generation factors: I.P.
G.I.
RS /GI
H.I.
Commercial types and proposed employment generation factors: L.C.
R.C.
O.C.
Other - specify
E
C,
J
Completion Date
or Phasinq Info.
Industrial Park 45 /gross acre
General Industrial 25 /gross acre
Rail Served G.I. 15 /gross acre
Heavy Industrial 10 /gross acre
Local Commercial 20 /net acre
Regional Commercial 17 /net acre
Office Commercial 70 /net acre
!1
•
•
ATTACHMENT G
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
GROWTH INCREMENTS - 1990 -2000
VACANT COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL LAND
AZ 1990 -1995 1995 -2000
Acres Type Acres Tppe
-38-
APPENDIX. VI •
Detailed Methodolog%•
The following methodology was used for compiling the
background information, the population forecasts, the
employment forecasts, and the final report:
BACKGROUND
1. Obtained population and employment forecast
material from multiple sources.
2. Updated cit} and sphere boundary map for west End -
(RSA 28) .
3. obtained Census Tract, Regional Analysis Zone
t
(P.M) and Analysis Zone (AZ) Maps from public
agencies and made transparent overlays for city
and sphere map.
4. Compiled questionnaire for distribution to local .
jurisdictions (see Appendix V).
pnPUL: +TION FORECASTS
1. Checked information on reasonable persons /household ratio.
2. Revised tract map data from previous forecasts
(1980) for updating by local jurisdictions.
3. Compiled tract map data provided by jurisdictions
for the period 1980 - 1990 by AZ and converted
to population.
4. Added household absorption potential of vacant and
infill acreage for period 1990 - 2000, considering
demand for residential product at allowed zoning,
and converted to population.
5. Aggregated 1980 Preliminary Census results to AZ
level from city data, for use as baseline.
6. Aggregated 3., 4., & 5. for each city and each AZ, and
phased growth over 1987, 1995, and 2000.
7. Graphed total and incremental growth for each
jurisdiction. •
-39-
• 8.
Met with city and County planning directors to review
preliminary results.
9.
Revised AZ analysis per the localities' recommenda-
tions.
10.
Coordinated process with SANBAG, SCAG, County, and
-<
6 cities.
11.
Met with planning directors to review and
gain approval of the product.
12.
Prepared final draft package for submittal to special
meeting of Planning Directors in Big Bear.
EMPLOYMEVT
FORECASTS
1.
Compiled all available market demand studies on in-
dustrial and commercial growth in the 5 County area.
t
�.
Reviewed material for appropriate levels of
employment growth for San Bernardino /Riverside and
then the West End.
• 3.
Disaggregated LARTS 1979 employment data by AZ into
city totals.
4.
For each city, compiled the following:
- employment generating projects by,intensity of
use,that were filed with each jurisdiction.
- vacant commercial and industrial zoned land.
- employment projections from various plans filed,
(such as the Ontario International Center, Vina
Vista, Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Park Plan)
at build -out and for the year 2000.
5.
Evaluated appropriate relationship of employment
to population, using SCAG -78 ratios,and selected
.48 employment -to- population ratio for 2000; up
from .32 in 1980.
6.
Evaluated projects, plans, vacant land, and absorp-
tion rates by percentages,by city,and assigned a
percentage 01 the total employment growth for the
West End to each jurisdiction.
7.
Reviewed the methodology and assignment of percen-
tages with planning directors.
-40-
s
i
0 8. Multiplied t!,at percentage by total employment to •
obtain year 1980 - 2000 growth increment for each
jurisdiction.
9 Allocated that amount of growth to LARTS 1979 baseline
employment by AZ,for 1987, 1995, 2000,according to
projects filed, absorption plans for large scale
projects, vacant land, etc.
10. Reviewed assumptions and methodology with SCAG and
SANBAG.
FINAL REPORT
1. Aggregated cit} sphere AZ, information for 1987, 1995,
2000,to total AZ.
2. Aggregated total AZ information to RAZ for 1987,
1995, 2000.
3. Summarized results by RSA and jurisdictions.
4. Listed additional information sources.
5. Compiled bibliography. •
-41-
•
l
0
i DOCUMENTATION MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT WCLC
-42-
- Questionnaire Responses from Local ,jurisdictions -
o
Filings for residential, commercial and
industrial projects.
o
Vacant land, by use and density category.
o
Commercial and industrial zoning.
o
Land absorption rates.
- Detailed
West End Employment Growth Analysis Package -
o
Orange County Industrial land Absorption.
o
Market Shares in Five - County Industrial Area.
o
Absorption of Industrial Land in Five- County
Area.
•
c
Market Area Industrial Land Absorption.
o
West End Industrial Acreage Absorption.
o
Industrial and Commercial Projects Summary -
By Sphere.
0
Filed Industrial and Commercial Projects -
By Sphere.
o
West End Employment Generation.
o
Employment -to- Population Ratio Analysis.
- West
End USGS Basemap System (at 1" = 1/2 mile) -
•
Basemap
•
Analysis Zone Overlay
•
Regional Analysis Zone Overlay
•
Major Development Projects and Studies Overlay.
.•
Commercial and Industrial Zoning Overlay.
o
Rail and Highway System Overlay.
-42-
APPENDIX VIII
SELECTED BIBLIOGR ?PHY
L
WCLC Population and Employment Forecasting
Kest End, San Bernardino County
If PROJECTIONS & FORECASTS
Arnold, Robert and Levy, Stephen. California Growth in the
1980's; Projections of Economic Regions of t e State.
Palo Alto, Calif.: Center for continuing Study of the
California Economy, 1979.
Ki ^.bell, Larry J. Economic Growth in California: Prospects
and Consequences. Los Angeles: UCLA Business Fore-
casting Project, May 1980.
Kimbell, Larry and Shulman, David. "Growth in California:
1 Prospects and Consequences," Public Affairs Report;
Bulletin of the Institute of Governmental Studies
(U.C. Berkeley), 21(5):1 -9, October 1980.
"Regional Economic Outlook; Southern California," Bank of
America News. Los Angeles: Bank of America, July •
1980.
SUB- REGIONAL BACKGROUND
Plannina Information: Riverside-
Angeles: Employment Development Department,
California Employment Data and Research, May
1980.
Activities Report for 1979; Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga,
Ontario and Related Activities for Upland. San
Bernardino: San Bernardino Count }• Economic Develop-
ment Department, 1979.
Supply and Demand; Riverside and San Bernardino
Counties. Sacramento: California Employment Develop-
ment Department, Job service, January -March 1981.
Newsletter. San Bernardino: San Bernardino County Economic
Development Department, 1978 -1980. Published quarterly.
Population
Housing Bulletin. San Bernardino:
San Bernar-
dino
County Planning
Department, January
1976 to
April
1979.
Includes 1975
Special Census Data.
Three
issues.
•
-43-
• Rea! Estate and Construction Report, First Quarter 1980.
Newport Beach, Calif.: The William, Lyon Company,
1980.
"RZgional Economic Outlook; Greater Riverside -San Bernar-
dino Report," Bank of America dews (Highlights).
Los Angeles, Bank of America, 1980.
Residential housing Summary; Riverside, volume 4. River-
side, Calif.: California Land Title Company, December
1980.
_San Bernardino County. San Bernardino: San Bernardino
County Economic Development Department, September 1971.
Pamphlet with inserts relating to business development.
LOCAL LEVEL BACKGROUND
Beland /Associates, Inc. "Economic - Draft," in Ontario
General Plan Update. Ontario, Calif.: City of Ontario,
1981.
Chino Hills Specific Plan Study - Draft. Newport Beach,
Cali:.: The Planning Center, EDAW, Metcalf and Eddy,
• January 1981. Prepared for San Bernardino County.
t
_Chino Hills Specific Plan Study; Phase III Economic Report
(Elaboration of Economic Parameters). Newport Beach,
Calif.: The Planning Center, 1980. Prepared for
San Bernardino County.
Draft EIR; Amendment 1 to Redevelopment Project No. 1;
Ontario Vintage Industrial Park. Ontario, Calif.:
Community Development Agency, November 1978. Prepared
for the Ontario Redevelopment Agency.
` Draft General Plan: City of Rancho Cucamonga Executive
Summary. San Francisco: way/Cooke, January 1981.
Prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
FISCOM; Computer Based Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis
Model. 1980 Summary along with MKGK Proposal,
February 1978. San Francisco, Calif.: Marshall Kaplan,
Gans and Kahn, 1980. Prepared for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Industrial Development Potentials in the Ontario Area, 1980-
2000. Addendum. Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.: Trinity
Development Company, March 1979.
-44-
C
L.D. King and Co. Meredith: Ontario International Center
Specific Plan. Santa Ana, Calif.: L.D. King company,
Mav 1981.
Ontario International Center Specific Plan. Irvine, Cali`_.:
Phillips, Brandt, ReddICK, May 1981. Prepared for the
City of Ontario.
Rancho Cucamonga; City -Fide and Industrial Area Traffic
Study; Final Report. Oakland, Calif.: DKS Associates,
March 1980. Prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Plan and Draft EIR; Final
Draft. San Francrsco, Calif.: Sedway Cooke and DKS
Associates, January 1981. Prepared for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
Victoria Community Plan; Impacts on School Facilities, CitV
of Rancho Cucamonga. Newport Beach, Calif.: William
Lyon Company, December 1979. Prepared for WCLC.
-45-
•
•
/c iS 1178-1
lel
'k'LyMny�A. ,� .� �' ia..v.✓ga��h./,�, /vzs,� itl�ii:�
,o'l"�le e-� -04
let
(M .�✓�ftR�limt/ .2"'N� �Ly',.� �C ?�AL,N.,rx¢l �- �- .!!%LV1^
l'h-� ficlLl tA� =r-` /'KJ� Ge�w�q( .- G�vLi•4m ?I -� -,-� /9 �/
�'fLS -Y+O rx i/irvl �. Tsf Gc�iYr. -�7 ol21YG('" � .+<DI�.G'rwx iu'�t !r/y svt.,Y �`�C
ci'^.
�L �T+- ptaa.un. nr.ti,✓ � n-i- ��.a -e � �t,...orti -� r�.�n,n.Q.ti .%"- "'
J11i4'"�
��� ���- �r ��,�•, -e � �,, -alt ,±..,./ �d -,.��� mot.
�r'"`ru � �/ �,, fir �i� / �•n-� �i. /- _ore.
LC�Yvtn -i' t .tiana� /,� T/ 2�wf �ersa. ePn�.�I�P
`L�i,�, /,r.�� C� 'tit, ✓iyyo � .f-n .il�[Cn.o ^'�vLt�/
ZIA, TC �u 2ayii 2 � dJ wcc a
/;1�aX y/�Iy�j iM" in'IS7fYii �',«•u .�� ZY,,,.oz �k�