HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/11/04 - Agenda PacketCUCAA104
ct.
yZO
OTY OF
• j
RANCHO Cl1CAMONGA
o ^��
C�/IIT���Y COUNCIL
F
Z C1V.L' NEA
U
>
1977
Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
November 4, 1981 - 7:00 p.m.
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead-
line for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and
third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Pledge to the Flag.
B. Roll Call: Frost Mikels Palombo ri , Bridge, and Schlosser.
• C. Approval of Minutes: October 7, 1981.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
A. Tuesday, November 10, 1981, 7:00 p.m. - Historical Commission - Lion's
Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road.
B. Tuesday, November 17, 1981 - 6:00 p.m. - Etiwanda Specific Plan Meeting -
Etiwanda Intermediate School, Community Room, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue.
C. Thursday, November 19, 1961, 7:00 p.m. - Terra Vista Kickoff Meeting -
Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without
discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -11 -4, in the amount 1
of $221,605,67.
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Kmart Corp. 4
8443 Haven Avenue for Off -sale beer and wine.
c. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for NorArco, Inc, 5
9533 foothill Blvd. for Off -sale beer and wine.
•
City Council Agenda -2- November 4, 1981
d. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Condition Use Permit 6
81 -08 - Sharma. Recommend that Council accept the bonds
and agreements for CUP 81 -08 located at 9113 Foothill Blvd.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -167
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -08.
e. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Director Review 14
81 -31 - Reiter Development: located at the southwest
corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -168 15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -31.
f. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien 22
• Agreement for Director Review 81 -31 - Reiter Development:
located south of Arrow Route, west side of Archibald Ave.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -169 23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM A. H. RIETER DEVELOPMENT AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN
THE SAME.
g. Acceptance of Offer of Dedication. It is recommended
that Council accept offer of 40 foot dedication on
Vincent Avenue for Director Review 81 -21 located on the
northeast corner of Vincent Avenue and Jersey Blvd.
28
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -170 29
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
40 FOOT DEDICATION ON VINCENT AVENUE AS OFFERED
FOR STREET AND RELATED PURPOSES.
h. Award of Street Sweeping Contract. Recommend that Council 32
award the street sweeping contract to the low bidder, R. F.
is Dickerson Co., Inc., for the low bid amount of $1,650 a
month,
Y!
City Council Agenda -3- November 4,
1981
•
i.
Planned Community Maintenance Policy. it is recommended
35
that a separate Landscape Maintenance District be formed
to cover maintenance within each planned community.
j.
Acceptance of Traffic Signal Project at Archibald and
40
Church and at Base Line and Hellman Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -171
41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND
CHURCH STREET, AND AT BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN
AVENUE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK AND FINAL PAYMENT.
k.
Release of Bond:
45
Site A royal�79 -01: located on the northwest corner of
9th Street eet and Beryl Street. Uwner: Community Baptist
Church.
•
Reduction of Improvement Security Instrument from
$51,000 to $25,500.
•
1.
Set Public Hearing Date of November 18, 1981 for the
following:
- Environmental Assessment and Planned Development No. 81 -05
(TT 9369 and 11173) - M.J. Brock. A change of zone from R -3
to R- 3 /P.D. for a total planned development of 119 patio
homes on 18.2 acres of land in the R -3 zone to be located at
the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald - APN
202 - 181 -23 and 24.
- Environmental Assessment and Planned Development No. 80 -10
(TT 11734) - OLV. A change of zone from A -1 to R- 3 /P.D.
for a total planned development of 98 townhomes on 8.5+ acres
of land located at the northwest corner of Vineyard and
Arrow Highway - APN 207 - 211 -28.
City Council Agenda -4- November 4, 1981
•
- Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Environmental
Assessment and Planned Development No. 81 -07 and Tentative
Tract 11869 - Roberts Group. A proposed planned unit develop-
ment of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land located
on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland
Avenue - APN 201- 252 -23, 25, and 26.
- Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Environmental
Assessment and Planned Development No. 81 -08 and Tentative
Tract 11928 - Shaffer /Westland Venture. A proposed planned
development of 67 townhouse units on 5.85 acres of land
located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of
Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 252 -32.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE:
APPEAL
OF PLANNING COMMISSION 46
DEDISION FOR THE
PREPARATION
OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF TENTATIVE
TRACT NO. 11933 -
WOODLAND PACIFIC.
• B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 - ,n' 47
L WLOR. request for a change of zone from R-1-14 _ �-
acres to R -1- 20,000 for the development of Tentative
Tract No. 10210 - APN 1061 - 172 -03. Related item:
Tentative Tract No. 10210.
ORDINANCE NO. 159 (first reading) 48
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1061- 172 -03 LOCATED
GENERALLY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE
AND ALMOND, FROM R -1 -14 ACRES TO R -1- 20,000
SQUARE FEET.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -06 65
TT 11144 - T
8 M BUILDERS. A total planned residential
development of
62 townhouse units on 5.4 acres of land in
the A -1 zone located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue �-
north of Arrow Route - APN 208- 211 -25 and 26.
ORDINANCE NO. 160 (first reading) 66
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208- 211 -25 AND 26 ON
THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, NORTH OF ARROW
ROUTE FROM A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D.
D. CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF 7TH STREET. Recommend 92
that Council order the vacation of 7th Street between
Center Avenue and the San Bernardino County Flood
Control Easement.
City Council Agenda -5- November 4, 1981
•
5 -d
`
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -173
93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED,
A PORTION OF 7TH STREET BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE
AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
EASEMENT.
E. UNIFORM SCHOOL FEES - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
ORDINANCE NO. 69 -C (second reading)
95a
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SUBSECTION "A" OF THE SECTION 16.24.080 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PRO-
VIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN THE FEES IMPOSED FOR
THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOLS.
F. ALLOCATION OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS.
96
• RESOLUTION NO. 81 -174
97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING
FOR THE APPROPRIATION OF REVENUE SHARING IN
EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT BUDGETED.
G. ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
98
DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT 10045-1 AND TRACT 1 3 0.
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council order
the annexation of Tracts 10045 -1 and 11350 to the
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -172
99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 6 TO
- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR
- TRACT NO. 10045 -1 AND TRACT NO. 11350.
a
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A. SENIOR CITIZENS' NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PROBLEMS. 107
Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
r• 1
LJ
City Council Agenda -6- November 4, 1981
Recommendation: It is recommended that the staff
actively pursue the funding of a grant with the
Regional Council on Aging in the amount of $4,690
with an additional $1600 to be provided by city
staff support and other inkind support. It is
further recommended that staff be authorized to con-
tact the Chino Basin Municipal Water District to
determine whether surplus property is available for
additional parking.
B. ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ON UNDERGROUND
UTILITY DISTRICT PRIORITY. Staff report y L oyd Hubbs.
At its regular meeting of October 22, 1981, the Advisory
Commission reviewed the recommended underground utility
district priority list as presented to the City Council
on October 7, 1981. The Advisory Commission concurred
with the priority listing and expressed their recommen-
dations.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -175
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
• OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PRIORITIZED LIST OF POTENTIAL PROJECTS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ACTIVE UNDERGROUNDING
PROGRAM.
C. URBAN FORESTRY GRANT. Staff report by Jack Lam.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City
Council approve the Resolution indicating support of
the revisions to the Urban Forestry Grant and directing
staff to forward it and the revisions to the State
Division of Forestry for processing.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -176
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING
THE CITY'S REVISED APPLICATION TO PARTICIPATE
IN THE URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM,
D. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
To OPEN ESCROW PROCEEDINGS FOR ACQUISITION OF ARROW PARK
SITE. Staff report by Bill Holley.
Request authorization for Community Services Department to
open escrow proceedings on 4,45 acre parcel designated as
is Arrow Park, located north side of Arrow Highway between
Vineyard and Hellman Avenues,
111
113
117
120
130
City Council Agenda -7- November 4, 1981
•
E. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 133
TO OPEN ESCROW PROCEEDINGS FOR ACQUISITION OF HERMOSA
PARK SITE. Staff report by Bi 1 Ho ey.
Request authorization for Community Services Department
to open excrow proceedings on 4.97+ acre parcel as a
portion of property designated as Hermosa Park, located
east side of Hermosa Avenue between Base Line Road and
19th Street.
6, CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
7. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting to adjourn to a Redevelopment Agency
meeting.
•
I _ to __ ,
Present were Councilmen: James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo,
Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney,
Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, James Robinson; Community Development
Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and
Community Services Director, Bill Holley.
Approval of Minutes: Councilman Frost and Councilman Mikels did not receive copies
of the October 7, 1981 minutes. Council concurred in continuing the approval to
the November 18 meeting.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Mayor Schlosser announced the Founders Day Parade and Wine Festival on November 14.
b. Councilman Frost announced there would be a Flood Control Advisory Committee
meeting, November 5, 8:30 a.m., Ontario City Hall.
C. Councilman Mikels had attended an Ommitrans Board meeting that morning. One
issued which was raised was the impact the passage of Senator Ayala's bill
reducing the fare box ration would have. The reducing of 20 percent of the
fare box ratio requirement by the percentage of elderly and handicap would
make an impact on our 325 contribution to Omnitrans. He requested staff to
investigate this for him and to have the information before the December
Board meeting.
d. Mayor Schlosser announced that there are presently vacancies on the Advisory
Commission - one opening for Alta Loma and one opening for Cucamonga. Anyone
wishing to volunteer for service could do so by contacting a councilman or
calling city hall.
e. Mayor Schlosser congratulated Steve Wheatley and John Lyons in their successful
election to the Fire District Board of Directors.
f. Mr. Wasserman reminded Council that Mayor Schlosser and Councilman Mikels had
been appointed to an Architectural Selections Committee, and they were to
appoint two planning commissioners to also serve. Mayor Schlosser said the Council
would discuss the item under the staff reports, item 5F.
g. Mr. Wasserman requested that public hearing item 4A, Appeal of Planning Commission
decision for the preparation of an environmental impact report for the develop-
ment of tentative tract 11933 - Woodland Pacific, be continued to December 2,
1981. This was a request of the aoplicant. Council concurred.
h. Mr. Hubbs recommended that council select a date the first of December to meet
in a special session to review the master drainage plan. Council concurred that
Thursday, December 3, 1981, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lion's Park Community Center.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -11 -4, in the amount of $221,605.67.
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Kmart Corp., 8443 Haven Avenue,
for off -slae beer and wine.
c. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for NorArco, Inc., 9533 Foothill Blvd.,
for off -sale beer and wine.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE-
MENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CON-
DITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -08.
e. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Director Review 81 -31 - Reiter Develop-
ment. Located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow E^ =e.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -168
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE-
MENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -31.
f. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for
Director Review 81 -31 - Reiter Development. Located south of Arrow Route,
west side of Archibald Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -169
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
FROM A. H. REITER DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME.
g. Acceptance of Offer of Dedication. It is recommended that Council accept
offer of 40 foot dedication on Vincent Avenue for Director Review 81 -21
located on the northeast corner of Vincent Avenue and Jersey Blvd.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -170
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING 40 FOOT
DEDICATION ON VINCENT AVENUE AS OFFERED FOR STREET
AND RELATED PURPOSES.
h. Award of Street Sweeping Contract. Recommend that Council award the street
sweeping contract to the low bidder, R. F. Dickerson Co., Inc., for the low
bid amount of $1,650 a month.
i. Planned Community Maintenance Policy. It is recommended that a separate
Landscape Maintenance District be formed to cover maintenance within each
planned community.
J. Acceptance of Traffic Signal Project at Archibald and Church and at Base Line
and Hellman Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -171
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND
CHURCH STREET, AND AT BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN
AVENUE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK AND FINAL PAYMENT.
k. Release of Bond:
Site Approval 79 -01: located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and
Beryl Street. Owner: Community Baptist Church.
Reduction of Improvement Security Instrument from $51,000 to $25,500.
- Environmental Assessment and Planned Development No. 80 -10 (TT 11734) - DLV.
A change of zone from A -1 to R- 3 /P.D. for a total planned development of 98
townhomes on 8.5+ acres of land located at the northwest corner of Vineyard
and Arrow Highway - APN 207 - 211 -28:
- Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Environmental Assessment and Planned
Development No. 81 -07 and Tentative Tract 11869 - Roberts Group. A proposed
planned unit development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land located
on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 201- 252 -23,
25, and 26.
- Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Environmental Assessment and Planned
Development No. 81 -09 and Tentative Tract 11928 - Shaffer /Westland Venture. A
proposed planned development of 67 townhouse units on 5.85 acres of land located
on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -32.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar as
presented. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
'IRAUL NO. 119JJ - WWOLAND PACIFIC. Applicant had requested a Continnanc
to December 2, 1981. Council had concurred with this recommendation at the
beginning of the meeting (see item under Announcements).
4B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 - LAWLOR.
Councilman Bridge requested to be excused from this item. He stepped down from
his council seat.
A request for a change of zone from R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 20,000 for the development
of Tentative Tract No. 10210 - APN 1061 - 172 -03. Related item: Tentative Tract
No. 10210.
Jack Lam presented the staff report.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 159
ORDINANCE NO. 159 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 1061- 172 -03 LOCATED GENERALLY ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE AND ALMOND, FROM
R -1 -14 ACRES TO R -1- 20,000 SQUARE FEET.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 159. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, and
Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Bridge.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Leon Redding, of C.M. Engineering Associates and representing Gregg Lawlor,
owner of the property.
walk the area by daylight.
Catherine Bridge, a property owner near the development. She wanted to
go on record as strongly opposing any more 20,000 square foot lots north of
Almond Street.
Mr. Redding said he had a slope map he would be willing to show. He
said the available land was only 15% slope. The 30% slope area was actually
in the open areas.
Chuck Morgan, owner of the property immediately to the East. He said
he was opposed to this development because of the density.
There being no further public response, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo that the item be continued until the
next Council meeting in order to give the Council time to look at the area first
hand. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, and
Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Bridge.
Vb. cpylRVnRLINLAL AJDIDDML:NI AV rWf NCU ULVLLVrnCL 01 -Vo 111 11144) - 1 6 n
BUILDERS. A total planned residential development of 62 townhouse units on 5.4
acres of land in the A -1 zone located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue north of
Arrow Route - APN 208 -211- 25 and 26. Michael Vairin, Associate Planning presented
the staff report.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 160.
ORDINANCE NO. 160 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 208- 211 -25 AND 26 ON THE WEST SIDE
OF VINEYARD AVENUE, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE FROM
A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D.
Motion: Moved by Palomobo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 160. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was:
Terry Christianson, of T 6 M Development. He said he was present to answer
any questions.
There being no further public response, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing
Councilman Frost inquired about the flood control areas to the west. He asked if
perhaps some land would be released at sometime in the future? Mr. Vairin said
that the Flood Control District had not shown any interest in releasing the land.
Councilman Frost asked if any public usage of the flood control land had been con -
sigered in the presentation of the project.
Mr. Vairin stated we have asked, as we always do with all project along the channels,
to have the design set to allow for access from the development onto the flood
control areas which we hope will eventually be developed as trails for public use.
The developer has indicated they would be willing to do so.
There being no further questions by Council, Mayor Schlosser set the second reading
of Ordinance No. 160 for November 18, 1981.
public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost, to approve Resolution No. 81 -173 and
the vacation of 7th Street between Center Avenue and the San Bernardino County Flood
Control Easement, and to waive the entice reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -173.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -173
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION
OF 7TH STREET BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT.
4E. UNIFORM SCHOOL FEES - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Staff report presented by Mr.
Wasserman.
Item was before Council for second reading. The request was to make the school fees
uniform in all school districts and to increase the fee to $1100 per single family
dwelling, and $550 for all multi - family dwellings of two bedrooms or more and for
mobile homes.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 69 -C.
ORDINANCE NO. 69 -C (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION
"A" OF THE SECTION 16.24.080 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR AN
INCREASE IN THE FEES IMPOSED FOR THE FINANCING
OF INTERIM SCHOOLS,
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost, to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 69 -C. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the uniform fee and increase,
by approving Ordinance No. 69 -C. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
Councilman Frost suggested that staff prepare an educational document for new school
board members to instruct them of the fee structure and its purposes.
4F. ALLOCATION OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
Mr. Wasserman stated that at the last meeting some senior citizens had brought
some requests before Council. He said these had been dealt with at the staff
level and a full report would be given under City Manager's Staff Reports No. 5A.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Councilman Mikels stated that he concurred with staff's recommendation to out
this additional $57,000 towards the sheriff's contract. He said he would like
to see an equal amount put into a contingency fund for unexpected requests.
best to earmark the revenue sharing to some service.
Councilman Frost asked what the current amount of revenue sharing was and the
current amount of the sheriff's contract. Mr. Empey stated that the original amount
allocated for general revenue sharing by the federal government was $196,000. The
sheriff's contract and the additional sheriff's costs come to approximately
$2.5 million. Councilman Frost said the purpose of the question was to in4icate
that the staff could save incurring additional administrative costs if all .f the
revenue sharing monies were allocated to one specific fund.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0 to approve the allocation of the additional funds
of $57,000 to the sheriff's contract and to waive the entire reading of Resolution
No. 81 -174. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -174.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -174
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE
APPROPRIATION OF REVENUE SHARING IN EXCESS OF
THE AMOUNT BUDGETED.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to direct staff to come back with a
recommendation for the placement of an amount equal to the additional revenue sharing
fund in an appropriate reserve account. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
4G. ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT
10045 -1 AND TRACT 11350. Staff report presented by Lloyd Hobbs.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Ed Syer, resident on Hidden Farm Road. He wanted to see a map of
the District. He expressed concern that the neighbors would have
a nice looking area while theirs would be run down.
John Bannister, resident of Hidden Farms Road. Also wanted to know
why their tract was not included in the District since it looked so
terrible.
Mr. Hubbs pointed out that they could get together with their neighbors and request
to join the Maintenance District.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. 81 -172
and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk
Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -172.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -172
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK
IN CONNCECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 6 TO LAND-
SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR TRACT NO.
10045 -1 AND TRACT NO. 11350.
Mr. Wasserman went over briefly the problems in the kitchen. He said that Mr. Holley
had submitted a proposal for some grant monies. He said Mr. Holley was present to
elaborate further.
Mr. Holley stated that he had a meeting scheduled at 8:00 a.m. in the morning with
members of the VIP Club to talk about some very specific ways to mitigate some of
the problems.
He said they have heard that their grant has been received, but no final decision
has been made.
Councilman Mikels stated that is why he asked for the establishment of a contingency
fund for just such unbudgeted requests as these which come up and funds have not
been allocated.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was:
Jim Hunt of the VIP Club. He thanked the Council for the prompt
attention to their petitions regarding the lack of parking at the
Neighborhood Center. He said at the present time there were only
32 parking spaced available arount the Center.
Councilman Bridge asked what the situation was with the Chino Basin Water District
in regard to the excess land which they owned.
Mr. Holley stated that about a year ago the VIP requested additional parking. At
that time we graded the land. However, it was not satisfactory -- during the rain
it was too muddy and there was not a curb cut made. Chino Basin has indicated the
land is available to the city either by lease or by sale as surplus land. As to
the actual cost, it would depend on how the city council completed the project.
Council concurred in having Mr. Holley come back to Council at the next meeting
with some options after talking with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District.
Mayor Schlosser called a break at 8:25 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:45 p.m.
with all members of the Council and staff present.
50. ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ON UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT PRIORITY.
Mr. Robinson presented the Adviosry Commission's recommendations.
Councilman Mikels recommended that when considering forming the district that some
alternatives be given for absorption of the costs.
Councilman Bridge concurred stating that this certainly would be a hardship on the
homeowners.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 81 -175
which establishes priorities for Rule 20 undergrounding and to direct work to begin
on the number 1 priority project, Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base
Line Road, and to waive the entire reading of Resolution No. 81 -175. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81-
175.
ACTIVE UNDERGROUNDING PROGRAM.
5C. URBAN,. FORESTRY GRANT. Staff report wap presented by Richard Marks, Associate
Planner.
The City Council approved the original urban forestry grant at the November 1980
city council meeting. Before Council was a revised grant. These revisions were
necessary due to the fact that the city was awarded less money than it had a -plied
for from the State Division of Forestry.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public input. There being none, the public
portion of the meeting was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 81 -176
and to direct staff to forward it and the grant revisions to the State Division of
Forestry for processing, and to waive the entire reading of Resolution No. 81 -176.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution
No. 81 -176.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -176
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE
CITY'S REVISED APPLICATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM.
report was
Staff requested authorization to open escrow proceedings on a 4.45 acre parcel to
be designated as Arrow Park, located north side of Arrow Highway between Vineyard
and Hellman Avenues; and on a 4.97+ acre parcel to be designated as Hermosa Park
located east side of Hermosa Avenue between Base Line Road and 19th Street.
Mayor Schlosser asked what would be put on these parks. Mr. Holley stated they
would be putting in atheistic fields, parking areas, picnic tables, tot lots at the
Hermosa Park site. Arrow Park would be going in in conjunction with the school.
In this was we would be getting joint public use of the land.
Mayor Schlosser asked if the school would not completely monopolize the park use.
Mr. Holley stated that he did not feel it would happen, but we would have to work
out these details by agreements.
Councilman Bridge stated that we should use what monies we now have available to us
which was the park fee money and buy these two pieces of property outright.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost to purchase outright the Arrow and
Hermosa Park sites and to transfer $606,000 from reserves to the park development
fund. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
5F. Added item: APPOINTMENT OF TWO PLANNING COMMISSIONERS TO THE ARCHITECTURAL
SELECTIONS COMMITTEE.
Councilman Mikels recommended that the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the planning
Commission be appointed to serve on the committee.
Councilman Bridge disagreed. He stated he would like to see Peter Tolstoy and
Herman Rempel be appointed to that committee.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to rescind the motion of the council
made on October 21 to have the council representatives, Mayor Schlosser and Council-
man Mikels, make the appointments. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Frost, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. ,NOES: Mikels. ABSENT: None.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to appoint Planning Commissions Peter
Tolstoy and Berman Rempel to the Architectural Selections Committee along with
Mayor Schlosser and Councilman Mikels and three staff representatives. Motion
carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser.
NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: Mikels.
Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson, announced that on Monday, November 16, at
10:00 a.m. staff would be reviewing the final revisions on the site plan.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. Mr. Dougherty stated he had nothing to report.
7. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn to
a Redevelopment Agency Meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting of
November 4, 1981 adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
11RO67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WARRANT
RECONCl.'.+ -ION
11 /04/81.
PAGE I
I�
y WARR E
YEN E V E N D 0 F N A M E
NNRE
DISCOUNT NET
RJOURNAL
I J
01454
8)00 RFMPFL HERMAN
10/09 /N1.
Ia1.Pn-
y D1459
2218 CHA.A OF COMMERCE
10/!2/91
6,001.w1
J
OI460
01461
9Z00 WASSFRMAN, LAUREN M
8200 ROBINSON, JAMES 11
10 /ILPI
IC/L3/01
353LO0
350.D0
01462
4 0D HOLLEY. WILLIAM L
10 /1.3 /81.
159,00
01463
6630 LAM JACK
ID /13191
350_00
1464
8 465
4995 HOBBS, LLOYD
3300 EN PE Y. HARRY J
10/13/01
10 /13 /tll
350.90
359.00
I r
01456
7720 PAl ON80. MICH ACL
]0/13/51
350.00
y 01467
4175 FROST, JAMES
10/13/ %11
350.00
0125 AC I I C TRAVEL AGENCY
10/13 /B1
1,056.90
J
101468
01469
01470
19RS PUBLIC
3050 DYNAMICFGRAPHICSTED FOU
10/13/81
1n 295.01
` 01471
6510 K E C COMPANY
10/13/81
1.00
01472
01473
R291 SALS PIZZA
6725 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
1.0 /14 161
10115181
40.10
10.00
01474
6125 LEAGUF OF CALIF CITIES
IC /1.5 /fll
79.11
y 01475
1500 BEEF CROSS
1.0 /LS/Ol
4,643.19
I J
9[476
01417
2038 CALIF OFNFAL SFRVICE
2038 CALIF DENTAL SERVICE
10 /IS /N1
10/15/81
1,362.92
1.392.3.1
01478
8313 SAN BRNONO CO EMPLOY C
10 /15 /fll
125.00
y 014 PO
8499 STATE 80 OF EOUALIZATIO
10/21/81
35.35
01491
7314 MILNF SHARON
10/71/81
291.48
J
01482
6725 1FAGU5 OF CALIF CITIES
10/22/81
50.00
I
01483
1200 BATIK OF AMERICA
10122181
91001.53
y O14B4
BITS TOWN C CCUNTRY POOLS
10122191
M.00
0 1445
2575 CUCAMONGA CO WATER 01ST
BANK AMERICA
10122181
715.77
J
1N 01431
01487
1200 OF
2525 CROCK Cf.MP ANY
10/22/91
10122.181
.22
71.61
!
I•'
y 01499
01489
9159 VIK BURGER OFLI
955H SUPPLIERS THE
10/27/81
IO /22 /RI
10.00
193.14
I J
01490
7648 OWENS 8120 PLUMBING
1.0/22 /91.
126.37
01491
8529 STINKY INC
(0 /221RL
250.00
y 01492
7826 PRINTING SERVICES
10/22181
121.21
J
01493
01494
4999 HURD JULIE
8327 SCOTT, JERRY 0
10/22 /Al
10122181
501). )0
6,952.21
I
-01495
7510 NATL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
10/22/81
0.00
y 01496
6185 PLAYNEY ASSOCIATES, JON
10/22/81
5'1.41
J
01497
01498
7195 MANSION INN
4900 HOLLEY WILLIAM L
10112181
!0/22191
256.00
350_00
01499
2015 CALIFS NIA CPI
10122 /B1.
60.00
y 01500
2255 CCHOpAFFEY UNION HS GIST
10/22/81
53.28
J
OL502
8315 BANOIPfONONf OEVR08431UN
10 23/81
201000.00
I
01503
9500 STATE COMPENSATION
10 /23/81
1.791.00
y 01504
8313 SAN ORMOND CO EMPLOY C
10/23/81
21801.50
J
01505
9330 WEST VALLEY MARSHALL
4595 6FNFRAL SERVICES PUHL
10/23181
10/97181
177.19
1! 07694
07858
S
4410 SHANNON FEPNANOEZ
10/07/01
2.10-
32.00 -
y 07981
2525 CROOK COMPANY
10/21181
127.75-
J
07985
079-6
2575 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
4133 FORTUNA MARGARET
10 /21 /9I
10 /21/81
721.59-
237.60-
04012
4315 KFRKA. 111104
L0 121181
30.00-
✓ 08054
4998 HURD, JUNE
10/21/81
5013.00-
J
08059
OSOT6
6185 BLAYNEY ASSOCIATES, JON
7510 NATL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
IG/2l /BI
10121 /BE
50.41. -
50.00-
I
06079
7645 ORAN,F CO SAI3DBAGrER
10 /21 181.
IZ6.37-
1V 08081
7418 PPESSTIGE INST PRINTING
10/21 101,
126.21-
J
ORO"
08196
8327 SCOTT, JERRY 0
8529 STFNNY C CO INC
I0 121 181
10121101
6,942.21-
25Dp)0-
08308
8555 SUTPHFN STUDIO, DICK
10 121 1BI
183.74 -
y 09111
8775 TOWN C COUNTRY POOLS
10/21101
ORLI4
9160 VENTURE
10/21/81
10.00-
08124
VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT
11/04181
09126
VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT
11 /04 /0I
r 09127
VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT
11/04/81
09{26
1A 08129
VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT
0006 A -1 TURF IRRIGATION SAL
31 /94 /SL
11./04 /81.
764.31
09130
0029 A G R ECU{ PNENF
11 /04 /el
0.79
06131
0125 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY
11/04/81
]2.00
Ia
08132
8134
0165 AGRICULTURAL COMA
0330 AN SEMINARS INSTITUTE
11/04/81
11/04/91
6,006.00
195.00
8 8134
0800 AUTHFLET. BEVERLY
11/04/81
195.00
Y 08135
1201 BANK OF AMERICA NT C SA
ll /04/81
145.55
,3
�
1
1108&7 CITY OF RANCHO COCAMDNGA
NARR 1 VCR 9 V E N D O R N A M E
00136 31 1315
08138 I15D
08139 1100
n6uO 22T1
00141 2279
O91i2 2315
09143 213S
09144 2405
08145 VU IB
03146 2575
f�08144 2595
09t48 2601
04144 2614
08150 2641
0915! 2650
09152 2696
08153 2699
09154 4139
09155 4z5U
08156 •495
08157 4446
08158 4497
091.9 4595
09160 4600
04161 4610
a-162 4640
�f ORL63 4650
08164 4794
09165 4911t5
0916 5]70
02169 6160
08170 6510
09171 6597
09172 6618
08173 6640
00173 6650
09 15 6770
0-176 7105
08!77 7193
09178 7375
.19179 7410
08180 7520
OR I /OB 92 1 Bl
In04183 7795
09164 7820
as 5
I OBI86 7997
08787 8075
08188 8095
OB199 8150
08190 8300
OR19 9307
0919 8133
08193 8355
08194 8373
OB195 VOID
o8196 VOID
09197 8390
08199 8395
08199 8492
onao 8525
_ +08201 0544
�e 08204 8775
08205 8946
0806 9020
0820 9
8 148
WARRANT RECONCILIATION 11/04/81
NARR )OURNA DISCOUNT
DATE PE FE1, NCE
NET
9.59
251_00
Ve_61
603.15
264.00
39.50
293.50
I31. ZA
25. t2
2,430.75
126.72
870.07
12 J2
1,395.90
52.65
60.00
3,435.75
1,
S
34,3
2,576.67
2n. 78
365.34
2.50
HL 61
14.00
60.00
23.38
03.90
9.00
65.00
82.84
PAGE 2
RR67 CCTV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
a NARR A VEN A V E N 0 0 R N A A E
0$210 9300 WEST PURLISIIING CO
ORj21I j1 9510 NILLOA[N ASSOC
0112(j 999$1 XEROX tORP
a 1A71A 6VOID RFE NCLCCA ANY
au
IM
WARRANT RFLONNCIL`:AT:ON tt /041$1
DATE REFERENCE DISCOUNT NET
11 /04/81 TJ.OR
11104/8L 1n1120.00
11/04/61
W04 1.658.12
10113/$1 'FINAL TOTALS 221.605.6?
PAGE 3 I�
I
I'
I'
Ia
II
I a
i
is
I
IIa
I'
la
I°
I
I°
I.
II
I �•
Ib
I�
I �
I
I°
•
•
L
J
COPY.
APPIICANON FOR ALCOHOLIC 1EVIRAGE LICENSEIS)
)er Drporrmen, of A¢aAa@ Lve, Cwaal
1215 Slreel
Seeromenlp. Cold. 9301,
rle.1- 1....••..e..1e^1
The rd.. R.ef Feet, apP4n for
frzeme. duorbed e, Follow
1. TYPES) OF LICENSEIS)
HE NO.
Off +ale BeerClLa
Applied order Sec 24044
Effemw Coln
RECEIPT NO,
GEOGRAPH CAL
CODE 015
Dale
hoed
3. NAME(5) OF APPLICANT(S)
Temp, Fined
Efleairt Omu
l.Lltt CD[pOPa ii'Ja
3. TYPE(S) Of 1RANSACTIONIS)
FEE
tic.
TD- E_
S
TO
ED m
I N.— of Rolm , zilpl mg
5. Lotoim. of lodreu— Number add Slew S
8143 Baum A -e.
,
City erd zip Cede s' Iio QYa_e; ... h
Saf}��•a
TOTAL
E
A. If L'rtemed, ). Are R,rl I od.
SIw +T,pe of Ltem< edam Clh Lmire? raa
1. Made, Addru, ff diflercrr from 5)— Number erd Shen O•�P,r..a
l•... ^�-- gS� -1 -- _ ^.ply T2 C'^3/ 3 rer. -ee
9. Per.,- ere, been mn.ined oIa Miry? , 10, V.— you eer .iololed or, IF 16e peo.idoe, of ,b. AkobcFe
- - - brerege Cenlyd An or re9o166on, of The Depott —t pen
roirinq 1. Me All? IF
1 L fe,]— a 'YES" amwer 1— 1— 9 or 10 en on ot,chmem wMch rlddl be deemed pan of 16, opplim(on.
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA' Counh of 3. Doma23rre D,le 78 /YP/ol . .
I,.•APPDCANi
S n 1'•I• It\ eel•• '-' ,,o .raiYI. —1, r I. ,ee ., rvwa.rvr
GN HfPF • •a+n l'�/\ ,I \ \K(jjVV--11 «... ,. _..u.._�.L•�°la'ICA .. 4.4./ 2igSO11 3a.^y�-u
iCO ... .r Cag:dala r
.,, .. APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR ,
S. STATE Of CALIFORNIA Ceunry of Elmo ...
.nr... w e...r ..... .........r.., r.rv.i., ,. n. e.......a
16 Nnma4l el 1R•rm.rd 11 El --d,l l,, U— n.(.1 ER. Ilrrru NrrmM1..fa
19, L.rol n N—h- did Sir,., Cdr aid I p Code ZEy1OP'_. Cole,
nn Ynl Will, &I TN, LIdy 1'oe
Aaaebed (] Reemded Ill ,
❑ fldrtiop pope„. 10 /zy /r)1 ..
[) P!ne.ni ite nr folder rar.rr, LI DP,t! on Pe;,:"llr ....
s' i
COPY._
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE WHISNSi
1, TYPE(S) Of LICENSE(S)
FILE NO.
FEE NO.
]o: Depmrmem of Al-A.1i, Bere.oae Caeeel
11150 S"... Sin Blrnard4jTY
orr, iaLZ SIT, i MI
Seeromenip, O.W. G5R11
GEOGRAJHICAL
............:r...v......
CODE 3615
Th. -d -l.ed le.bl oll for
Da1.
Bwmn d.o -led a. fall..n
Inu.d
nmp 1-s
2. NAN.C51 OF APPLICANT(S)
Applied urMn Sel. 21011 ❑
2Q%%J
T ^/3���
EMen•e CaU 7R /8l
ER<ai.. Dale.
-
3. TYPE(5) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
LIC.
APR 1RLI .
TYPE
.. Prf50/`-.0e-AC7ACER,IIT. TI019Or3 5.
Pr.R. TSr.
F 25.00
2:
Seri tOb -u�.. OS Hd eSi:GI G-r fi
sac n
..
Li incorporating
a Na a of Is-...
EOr -Arm CT 21
S. Lxmlen of Bvunn.- NOmb<r end $I-e
.� 9533 rpptdill Blvd.
-'
,ON a:.d 2m Cade ea.nn
3953+
5 25.00
' RJ♦ncb C.Glp(EQA 91730 SAN Fp
$FCEIPi NO. TOTAL
_.._ d. if o -0
P,emr u....Rd. 2099228 T.
Show Type of D ... w
B, Mod.ey Address (II d8.nenr Irom 51- Num6er osM Arwr Ir• ^P ✓ ^n
Rue r2RY
p. xv.e yov vex bin mmhred d a felony] r�,7 10. Ha•s you ern deleted any el rb p.of 'he. of the -1 a Fee
Be.e.oye
Ill, As Mr rpulotiom el the 0-1-I me t pm
' nby ro tM1e An .Nh
11 E,plam n "YES" ons- to items I or TO om on anrchmenr ..bah .hall be deemed part as li: t appllmhan,
Apps-e yv eshe ^
.1 1-1 n. di e.nu ..... a,.. -,1. b relmdone l seo.amn. of the AImM1Oha bmerope C-1 of All
13, STATE OF CALIFORNIA County al San BaTlyLdiElO ....,. paH ly /iW Jl _
ll ..r .
7.
. ..:ri a:S✓ w wr YwM'n�•.«r�.
ARCO, IRC
SIGN HERE
D .. HumOn + Lpyjdn., P^an.a.C.
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR ^'
15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Covnry of Sian TN
uOrdiM Dote lµ. `$ /0l
sl
W..
16 N-10 of lhmodrl ' •••••.•• ••••••• •• ••• o• ^' I] _ coat vdvl ^( l'mm•ehl 18 Ert•nm N...eM1.dd
{50VAGINYA4, Iletaa0 5. % / ^' "✓ 20- 099220
CITY of'RAN&6 cUCAMMA ' "
-- - AOM1NIfTRAtICb` i
n,VoWN,, Orfnr. This b,,N Tar OrymgmmE tle DA,
Alnah.d.. [ {P .... led name. _
❑ Ndveap MR"" AM 231 10/25/81
_..._0 ..�.__._.._._..... ...__..._.�_ ..... .. _COPIES MALED ...
•.�..:a.r..
�P .. . e .......
Venah R. el..:.L...:..'. sold ~•. _ „/,.0m..'.. � .,. p.r _. . r.. .....
•
u
•
,•
1
"a
1r n1n ♦111.r 1111 nn1^�Tl
STAFF REPORT
F'
DATE: November 4, 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for CUP 81 -08 - Sharma
Satyendra Sharma has submitted the attached bonds and agreement
to ensure the construction of off-site improvements for CUP 81 -08
located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution accept-
ing the bonds and agreement for CUP 81 -08.
Re£ully subL��
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
4�
. RESOLUTION N0. a1 -14,7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 81 -08
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed
on November 4, 1981 by Satyendra Sharma as developer, for the improve-
ment of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard.
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property as re-
ferred to Planning Commission, Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -08; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
• of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and
said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
ATTEST:
Lauren PT. Wasserman, City Clerk
rAl
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
0
0
0
CITY OF
RANCHO CL;C NVNGA
PLANNING DIVEOX
NORTH
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
CUP 81 -03
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered
Into, in conformance with the provisions Of the Municipal Code and Regulations
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Satyendra
Sharma _ hereinafter referred to as the Developer.
NITNESSET4:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the
City of, rIIP g1_ in accordance
m m
with the Drovt si pns of the report 0 the Comty Develo point Director thereon,
and any amendments thereto; located 9113 Foothill Blvd.
and,
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said
developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prier completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing
said approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer
as follows:
1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all
•
improvements described on page 3 hereof within one year from the date
hereof.
2. The tern of this agreement shall be one year , commencing on the date
of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on
the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term
has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provi-
sions of this agreement, in writing net less than four weeks prior to the
default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for
additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the
right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards,
cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have top right at any time to cause said provi-
sions to be completed by any lawful morns, and thereupon to recover from
said Developer and /or his Surety the full test and expense incurred in so
doing.
5. Encroachment pe omits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office
of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -
of -way, and the developer shall conduct soon work in full compliance with
the regnlatiens Contained therein. Man- corillance may result in stopping
of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided.
6. Public rim ht -of -way improvement work required Shall be constructed in
conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and
Standard Drawings and nay special amendments thereto. Comtrue Non shall
include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for
drainage or public SIfnty.
•
0
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple-
tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the
event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
means.
8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re-
naval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and
other debris from the public right -of -way resulting from work done on the
adjacent property or within said right -of -way.
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval
of the City Attorney. The principal amount Of said improvement security
shall be not less than the amount shown below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED:
Faithful Performance Bond 34,872.00
Material and labor Bond $2,436.00 _
• IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
' � `DEVELOPER
BY:p _��< +s'c�i DATE:
BY: DATE:
WITNESS: OAT E!
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
_ MAYOR
ATTEST: CITY CLERK
Sl.nf r n C +b b INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
mm '
Cnungnl SIN 9EA\)VIDFUO 5.5
fill. rNnF!"AGNKb Oa d... I 21ST d.ry ..1 OCTparm 17 RI, Islr vn nlf,
rSI ALr .LU a.m idl, a and nrrsad SAN
p ^r.nr.,d. +pp,vad SATYP..NPRA 114AR SHARMA uvnp.
•
O knrs,n n, nl, lui„ 111, ryrw,n ,. hu n.rrnf lc
merwn.n r, .ind ibnn„hd;rU rtv,: Lr u,benbfd rn tlu••d
nle
V \C II \LV M1.I nrl rd lal
J i
r ..... .. .,,
....,.
1114., Al I I I n•nd( rr(il S,A iA RF.RNA NIIIH D
. n>nl \II ),rJrm Brun e. pour `I'y II q;, .. . Cnumy •vlSur.
1 ) 19
For Median island contiguous to 9113 Foothill Blvd,
C11— u- �MPO
.0:: %::D 30::0 ZSTZ:-LITL
M,CSO-,C:::!t:;T 'E"' = FEE SCHcDULE
(AC.uh t. Copy")
DAYS: Oe t. 16, 1981 PEMIT NO, COIMTCD BY
FUc Rfcce cr CUP 81-08 Cit, Dra.in, N.,
NOTE; Does , include eur.enc fve for ur "ing p.Inic o r
CONS"UCTION COST ESTINUM
ITEM
M'A:;-,ITY I
TIjT
I C.?J-, CCST
1 3 1•p-TT
I—
T r.
I
4,8]$.00
VATTIM7�, P. "qrnS:,A:EC :: BO,!:D (ICO-,)
4 472
OLI
I, C.F.
I I q,
L.F.
1 gn
A.C. 4.11 (5210 ,
I
L. F.
(rtg SCII^CLE)
I" lid,Mk
M0!.',NMBTATTON BO:O) (CASI)
6"
•
I., ?.C.f. C.... G.C"-
C. Y.
?,�nittai of Su�arad!
SIC.
A.C. (ov,r 1300 ton,
1
TON
A.C. (9110 ce 1300 1,0
ToN
500 " -01
-ON
501, I'll)
Patch A.C. (ITe1.1 )
H
El.
I
>d'" 11 t, r,?z
EA.
EA.
I
It,
i
EA. I
T,.,
I
EA.
t
So" cut
1 192
LF
1.00
182.00 1
ReMoVe A.C. OaVeMent
t 176
SF 1
0.30
353.00 -
Fill (Too Soil) 9- ThIc.%
1 30
CY
1 6.00
240.00 1
and lrrnoatl.O
1 1092
SF
2.50
2730.00 1
I
0
CMSTRUCTION Cos-,
4,429.00
COUTNMENC.7 COSTS
443.00
TOTAL CO::STRUCTICN COSTS
4,8]$.00
VATTIM7�, P. "qrnS:,A:EC :: BO,!:D (ICO-,)
4 472
OLI
V,SX, AND MTESLM, BOLT (50%)
1 •16
An
IESVICTICN FEE
(rtg SCII^CLE)
M0!.',NMBTATTON BO:O) (CASI)
•
Bonds LOS- 065591
hliER &1S, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and Satyendra Sharma
(hereinafter designated as "principal ^) have entered ante an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated 19 81 , and identified as
project CUP 81 -08
1s hereby re err¢ d to and made a part hereof: and,
WHER &NS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement,
NOW, TREREFORE we the principal and
Balboa Insurance Company * as surety, are he an
firmly bound unto the City of Reach. Cucamonga (hereinafter called
'City"), in the penal sum of
0 ors w u.
money of e e nited States, or the payment o which sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and seMrally, firmly by these
presents.
• Te condition of this obligation is such that if the above
boundh
ed principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi-
tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration
thereof made as therein provided, om his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no changer ex-
tension of tine, alteration or addition to the terms of the
aereement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec -
STATE' OF— cord Fnentn ' -7 -rho came shall �• - --- ^ ^ ^�'• -^' ••^ --
ar
Coenry of LOS ANGELES I
Qn rAis_ 19 [1, _dry n/ UCIOPe 19.81 Ar /ere er
4..1. SIIUPPER aNnrnrr P.14m in and /or rAr acid
ICnun ry n/ _ 1.0R AN6ELF.S _ $rare n( CALUPORNIA r,,idm, WWII, duly roe,mWintof
• uIme mm, Pr.lmnlly apprnmd �:__LEF ' 0.l j(
mtrpd n ny�A,r I..' � in inmnbrum m Arr n lrh enm!/A I .0 nne!kn ,mrr,, n m•Want o .m r/ narra
that Ae mAcnhrQnAr aam../A.O-11'ns nsuPRf r r .
I% Ifjjj v
�% .Nefnm•Puhll - (nr rAr Coun
LAS ASf.ELf __,Srrrr e/ CALIPoRStA
man, i....:»:.... ...... �. ».:.
Bond$ L05n065593
•
IABOR AND MATERIALMEI BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and Satyendra Sharma
(hsreinafter designated a print pal have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public imorovements, which said agreement,
dated 19 81 , and identified as pro-
ject CUP 81.08
is hereby referred to and ma e a part hereof; and,
W'f1EREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the watk, to file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part a of Division 3 of the
Civil Cade of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of - --
Do Lars 1, oz mateu al•
urnished or labor thereon of any kind, or or amounts due voter
the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor,
that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought
upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 1S (commending
with Section 3082) of Part s of Division 3 of the Civil Cade, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns In any suit
brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and affect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of tine, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the spueifie.tien9 accempanyina the same shall in
On rhia_._19th _day./ Dc taber IH 81 hr /.n mr
Neln, Pa hlir in aml /rr th, said
Cnunry n/ 1.05 A4f.ELP.S •glob n/ CALIiORY1A _- rexidinp rhrrrin, duly rnmminlionrd
and rrrnm,Onnn,ml(y....Prot.... A. F,! LF.F. Rnnrrn r, mr to Ar lhA A ;a Fort of IAr
Rain.. I.m..... Company. IAr's"n omm Ihmt r+rrrnM IAr rri,Ain in rnrmrnr dnrAnnrr IrdRrd to mr
the, Ar xuM1wdh,vl }M,{rP.'^:.n %rAr R.Ihnn lnYurnnrr Cumpnny lArmrn nnllNir nrr nne,n NrnmryM Fa,u
YR � Narary!t '
e oC ly of
pppLOS A_ELE Nlal / CALIFORNIA
/
1LOORfn114
13
i
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 4, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Erall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Director Review 81 -31
Reiter Development
A. H. Reiter Development has submitted bonds and agreement to ensure
construction of the off -site improvements for D.R. 81-31 located on
the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Arrow Route.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council accept the improvement agreement and
'security for D.R. 81 -31 for the construction of off -site improvements
to be constructed.
Respectfully submittOl
LBH:Bif -jaa
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -)W
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR
REVIEW NO. 81 -31
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration and Improvement Agreement executed
on November 4, 1981 by A.H. Reiter Development as developer, for the
improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specif-
ically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner
of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property as re-
ferred to Planning Commission, Director Review No. 81 -31; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
• of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and
said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
•
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
r
•
:i "wer j�tt41111_
nigi N�xr. n
ha er linl��M ,�,w �rrax
Uf•!� _
4
.I
M
i�
V�
ni
vV
NORTI i
CI'T'Y OP ITEM: bicac ar IZe�ieu (Uo. Bl 31
• RANCHO CUCAMO GA TITLr.: _RL�tI
P "* /
SC.\ LE-
(reduce
I�
Wr
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
DIRECTOR REVIEW 81 -31
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered
into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations
Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and
A. H. Reiter Bevel. nt hereinafter referred to as the Developer.
W., a genera Dnrtnership
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the
City of, Director Review 81.31 1n accordance
with the provr the report of the Community Development Director thereon,
and any amendments thereto; located southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
.Arrow, Route one,
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said
developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the city Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing
said approval;
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer
as follows:
1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all
•
improvements described on page 3 hereof within nine monthsfrom the date
hereof.
2. The tern of this agreement shall be nine months, commencing on the date
of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on
the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term
has been extended as hereinafter provided.
34 The Otioloper my request additional time in which to complete the provi-
sions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the
default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for
additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the
right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards,
cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
adjustments thereto when warranted by ;ubstantial changes therein.
4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provi-
siams to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from
said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so
doing.
5. Encroachacnt permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office
of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -
of -'day, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with
the regulations contained therein. lion- compliance may result in stopping
of the nark by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided.
6. Puhlic right- of -oay improvement rmrk required shall be constructed in
conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and
Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall
include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for
dratwge or public safety.
•
17
0
IMPROVEMENT AGREE<ENT
7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple-
tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the
event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
means.
S. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re-
moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system.
9. The Developer shalt be responsible for removal of all loose rock and
other debris from the public right -of -way resulting from work done on the
adjacent property or within said right -of -way.
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval
of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security
shall be not less than the amount shown below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED:
Faithful Performance Bond $4,500.00
Material and Labor Bond $2,250.00
• IN WITNESS HEREOF. the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opposite their�ignatures:
BY: � DATE: /[ —1-,0
BY: OAT E:
WITNESS:. DATE: —t-
OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
BY: MAYOR
ATTEST: CITY CLERK
DATE:
•
0
fIT'. OF R.1::C90 cCC:JIU.:G.\
COSST =CTION AND :0::0 F.STi!E1T:
F,yCdO,\C:OIEFT PER>IIT FE: XMINLLE
(Attach to "t nSpet[o r'x Copy ")
DATE: 10 12181 PERlIIS H0. CONFUTED D'I J• StOfa, Jr.
File Reference Director Reylea 81 -31 City Drawing No,
SOTC: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement replace-
ment deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTI'IATE
ITEM
QUINTITY
MIT
UNIT COST
S .
TOM CONSTRUCTION COSTS
4.500
FAITH.M. PEMFOR'0=N Glib (100:)
4 5C0
_ P'nr
"
Z.250
1.. F.
Cur C.F.
I
L. F.
•
A.C. gem f52n0 Mn,
I" P.C.C. Sid walk
1
ROD
S.P.
I" Prive Fnnreach
S. F.
N" : '..1'.. Cross Cn[[er
S. F.
Sweet Elts,.Iion
I
C. Y.
In[Nrced Emban Men[
C. Y.
Puna ca inn of Sub,.,de
I
S. F.
F•. -, � ^" Inu
I
1.C. Invwr00 [o msl
1
ID\
:.. C. 1900 to 1300
TON
C. (,I'd,- 50 w 9nO tons)
TO::
iln rnnll
;OS
Pat" 'G. ctll.,fi,
l•• 'lick . \.r.. O,,rlav
S.S.
Id,,..[ sewer C.U. 1. er.de
I
EA
Ad :1:5[ Icaer %aly x to (trade
F.A.
0
3
Ins
I
1
I
I
1
I�
C.ONSMMON COST
4.400
CO::TIUC.E):C'i COSTS
100
TOM CONSTRUCTION COSTS
4.500
FAITH.M. PEMFOR'0=N Glib (100:)
4 5C0
IAikIR AND n%TLRbJ. BOND (50i)
Z.250
V4INEEM11 ISSPFCTIOF FCC
MIE SCNEOI'LE)
NO:1JENTANO:: PO::n (C\SiU
•
• Oond No. 20SO.08 -06114$
premium $81.00
EXECUTED IN TRIPLICATE
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renchm Cucamonga, State
of California, and A. H. REITER OEVELOPNENT CO., a general partnership
(hereinafter dasigna to as pa nca pa ^) eve entere an to an egteement
whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated
public improvements, which said agreement, datedon or about October 1st,
1981, and identified as project Director Review 81 -317 w c rn r- or- A"hTbald
Avenue and Arrow Route as ereby referred to and ma e a part
Wed,
hereof;
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF NAUSAU,
A !L[uaLCO_mnanv ae surety, are held and fly
bound unto the Crt -of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City")
in the penal sum of four thousand, five hundred __------------------------
Dollars is 4,5w.w ) _Iawful money of
the , we b Stater, ve t e payment
heirs o. w m sum ex 1 and truly to be
made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and admini-
strators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
• hounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and
well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions
in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein
provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time
and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to
their true intent and meaning and shall indemnify and save harmless
City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein sti pelated, then
this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and
remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the
face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and
reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees,
incurred b•! City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be
taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension
of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to
the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying
the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alterati
or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work Or to the
specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the
principal and surety above named, on October 7th , 1981.
A. H. REITER V Pt NTN�TTCCCOO�`� ayoneral
D
EMPLOYEAS INSURANCE OF 'WAU'SAU. A Mutual
M Company
Hart}, J ny, A
Bond No. 2050 -08- 051145
Premium for this band ii intl
in that shoed on the Performance Be
EXECUTED IN TRIPLICATE
WBOR AND HUR nRIAWfEN 90ND
NREREAS, the City COUncil of the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga, State
of California, and A N RE ITER DEVELOPHEM [0., a general partnership
(hereinafter designated a prrncrpal"I have entered into an agreement
whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated
public improvements, which said agreement, datedon or about Otto ef1i gal,
and identified as project 0l rvrinr Review Al -31. s1. corner of Arth�d
Avenue and Arrow Route , is hereby referred to and made a part
exeo ; and,
NNEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required
before entering upon the performance Of the work, to file a good and
sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure
the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with
Section 1083) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State
of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate
surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
all contractors, subcontractors, laborera, matexialmen and other
persons enployed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and
referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Praeedure in the sun of
fwd inn sand two hun __________________a ---------------------
fifty a Dp ors 2 250.0ll ar materials
l:utnashec or labor t ereon f�ny kind, or or mounts due under th�
Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that
said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount
hereinabove, set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond
will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable
expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by
City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and
fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the
judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall
inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations
entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3083)
of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of
action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
Should the cond'_ty on of this bond be fully performed, then this
obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and
remain in full force and effect. .
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension
of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its
obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such
ch,:nge, extension, al terntion or addition.
IN WITNESS WHERr.OF, this instrument has been duly evdcuted by the
principal and surety above named, on October 7th , 198-.
A. H. REITER DE _ ?Q4T Co. _neral
ei•zhf�p
B
EMPLOYERS INSUOANCE OP NAUSAO _8 MOUe0
o�.:pany
envy ttor% in .'act
•
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 4, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
GG G�MO
ci; o
}} A
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and
Lien Agreement for Director Review 81 -31 - Reiter
Development
1977
Attached is a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
for Director Review 81 -31 located on the west side of Archibald Ave-
nue, south of Arrow Route. This agreement ensures the future con-
struction of the median island on Archibald Avenue adjacent to Direc-
tor Review 81 -31.
It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution
ing the agreement for D.R. 81 -31.
Respectfully submitted,
v
LB t a
Attachments
• RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM
A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME.
WHEREAS, Director Review No. 81 -31, located south of Arrow
Route on the west side of Archibald, submitted by R.H. Reiter Development
was approved on September 9, 1981; and
WHEREAS, Installation of a landscaped Median Island established
as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry
into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by A.H.
Reiter Development;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in
the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1981.
• AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren li. Wasserman, City Clerk
C
C A r V[
uxe�tr f�atLUiL
/4V4t'1u.1�1x r YJ�u M
xx.. r�rfr�.4u•
h�nrr•rrr •y.n� Yw�
I i' 1 n
�rTr ie.�'L
l
I
✓ V
NORTI I
(.M, (1' ITEM _b- ree{or,ew R)A 81-31
CUCI ININ NGIA TITLE .geicr
a / c� ^� H� i
M IMIT _g_ SCALD
(reduce
n ,I
IvIf
0
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
and
WHEN RECOP.DED HAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9320 -C Base Line Road
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
REAL PROPERTY I:IPROVE.NENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
'HIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 1981, by and between A. N. Reiter (hereinafter
referred to as "Developer "), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), provides
as follows:
WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of
a building permit for industrial development, the City requires the
construction of a landscaped median island with irrigation on meter, •
adjacent to the property to be developed: and,
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of
such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided
that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer
to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after
demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide
that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails
or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real
property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's perfor-
manse, and any repavrent due City.
NOW, THCRCEORE, THE PARTIES AGREE:
1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install
one -half of the landscaped median island with irrigation on meter, in
,)ccOre.lnco and cocptrancn with ,I] applicable ordinances, resolutions,
rules am: pngula Cioas of tho City is effort at the time of the installa-
tion. Said imprravnmenta shall to installed upon and alan, Arohtbald
Avenue ad3acent to Developer's property hereinafter duserrh:ed, •
h ��
0
2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed
not later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer
from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of
said improvements shall be at no expense to the City.
3. In the event the Developer fails or refuses to complete
the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at
any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its
intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and
complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred
by the City from the Developer.
4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms
and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City
of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improve-
ments upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by
these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following
• A=s :ribed real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, state of California, to -wit:
Parcel 4, Parcel leap 5664, being a division of a portion
of the north one -half of the northeast one- quarter of
the sonthoast one - quarter of Section 10, T. 1 S., R. 7 W.,
San Bernardino Meridian in said County. (ARM 209- 021 -38)
S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the Purposes
described above.
6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithful!y
perform all of the arts and thiangx by then to be dory+ under this
Acrce-cnt, then this conveynnce shall he roid; otherwise, it shall
remain in fill force an.l effect and in alt respcc ^s shall be considered
I..! tre.it d as i mortgogc on the real property and the rights and
nhl instumc of th, parties with rcapCnt thereto shall .,o governed by
the pr r: r; u.ns of the Civil CnJo of the St,,tc of GlliPo rnia, and any
miner apnlira ble stntutc, pct :nim �ar to mortgarjes on real pr�vr [•.
7. This Aar,m,nt 'hall be binding upon and shall insure
to thr Lnm!fit of thm t.... , •"ccutors, adminrstr,tors, successors and
assigns of each of the parties hereto.
r!
0
a. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement
as a mortgage, the term 'Developer" shall mean "mortgagor" and the
City shall be the 'mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil
Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to
mortgages an real property,
9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is
entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the
right of the Developer to redeem the above - described property from the
mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be
awarded by the Court.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the day and year first above written.
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, a municipal
Corporation
BY:
PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER
Mayor
ATTEST;
LAUREN M. WASSEXIVIN
City clerk
DEVELOPER
��y •
�0 On this the 1'411 dry of l(AA, 1' ! 191, bidne me. 'N
Stiteol
}
,
' County of f., L!i �yrt ��,.,
Ih¢undersigned Notary PuDla, personally app¢arN
i
t
sew
OFFICIAL 'rAL
known to me to be the persons) whose name(s) ..._ subutribelft
to the wdhin insbument and etknowliebld that
I 1 RWERIT LtIN AIIi 11R Ei
-•
°' ''
¢.ecuted the tame to, the Purposes therein contained,
c� *•' ^oo"
ike
1 `.. WI B'. ralYpbn WUnM1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set m hand and oll.oal seal.
Y
0
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 4, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
C�ICA p^
ol�
Fil � Z
UII D
SUBJECT: Acceptance of 40' Dedication As Offered on Vincent
Avenue for Director Review 81 -21
1977
Attached for Council approval is a resolution to accept an offer
of dedication for Vincent Avenue. Vincent Avenue was previously
offered to the County of San Bernardino and rejected.
Improvements on Vincent Avenue have now been completed by Cronin
Industrial as a conditior of D. R. 81 -21 located at the northeast
corner of Jersey and Vincent Avenue and can be accepted into the
City street system.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution accept-
ing the dedication of Vincent Avenue and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to sign and direct the City Clerk to record same in the
office of the County Recorder.
tfully sukmitted,
LBli:BK:jaa
Attachments
p' C
• RESOLUTION NO. S7 -!?o
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
40' DEDICATION ON VINCENT AVENUE AS OFFERED
FOR STREET AND RELATED PURPOSES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The offer to dedicate to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, the property herein described for Street and
related purposes, is hereby accepted. Said property is described
as follows:
That portion of the South Half of Section 12, Township
1 South, Range 7 West, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, described
as follows:
Commencing at a point in the North line of the South 986.04
feet of said South 112 of said Section 12, said paint being
3207.00 feet East of the center line of Haven Avenue, said
point being also on the center line of Vincent Avenue, if
• extended Northerly, as said Vincent Avenue was conveyed to
the County of San Bernardino by Deed recorded August 2,
1967 in Book 6866, page 560, Document No. 513 of Official
Records of said County; Thence North 00 13' 00" West along
the Northerly prolongation of said center line of Vincent
Avenue, a distance of 40.00 feet to a point in the North
line of Jersey Boulevard as said Jersey Boulevard was con-
veyed to the County of San Bernardino by Deed recorded
June 29, 1967 in Book 6847, Page 307 of Official Records
of said County, said point being the True point of Begin-
ning;
Thence continuing North 00 13' 00" West along said North-
erly prolongation, a distance of 510.00 feet to the North-
west corner of that parcel of land conveyed to M -2 Leasing
Co., by Deed recorded August 20, 1968 in Book 7086, Pages
260 and 261 of Official Records of said County;
Thence North 890 59' 32" East along the North line of said
parcel of land conveyed to M -2 Leasing Co., to an inter-
section with a line that is parallel with and 30.00 feet
East, measured at right angles, from said Northerly pro-
longation of the center line of Vincent Avenue;
Thence South 00 13' 00" East along said paralled line, a
distance of 490.07 feet, to the beginning of a tangent
• curve concave to the Northeast and havinq a radius of 20.00
feet;
nC-1
c(
Resolution No.
Page 2
Thense Southeasterly along said curve through an angle of •
890 47' 28 ", a distance of 31.34 feet to a point of tan-
gency with the North line of Jersey Boulevard, said point
being also a point of cusp;
Thence South 890 59' 32" West along said North line of
Jersey Boulevard, a distance of 49.93 feet to the True
Point of Beginning.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be filed for record
in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST: •
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
7j
r 1
U
9
0
0
0
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 4, 1981 p_ ;j
OLL-
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of City Street Sweeping Services Contract
As authorized by City Council, bids were solicited and received
for providing City street sweeping services. The contract was
advertised in the local legal newspaper and mailed to three
locally known, responsible contractors. Two bids were received.
Bids have been reviewed and were found to be complete and sub-
mitted by responsible contractors. The apparent low bid of
$1,650.00 /monthly was submitted by R. F. Dixon Co., Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council accept all bids submitted
and award the contract to the low bidder, R. F. Dixon Co., Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:MP:bc
Attachments
7�
CONTRACT SWEEPING SCHEDULE
EVERY TWO WEEKS
Vineyard from Foothill to Hillside
Beryl from 19th to Banyan
Banyan from Carnelian to Beryl (north side only)
Hellman from southerly City Limits to Hillside
Archibald from 4th to Highland
Hermosa from Church to Lemon
Lemon from Hermosa to Haven
San Bernardino Road from Vineyard to Archibald
Base Line from westerly City Limits to Haven
6th Street from Hellman to Archibald
4th Street from westerly City Limits to Cleveland (north side only)
EVERY FOUR WEEKS
Arrow from Vineyard to Turner
Turner from 8th to Church
Beryl from Base Line to 19th
Sapphire from 19th to Hillside
• Banyan from westerly City Limits to Carnelian
Hillside from Turquoise to Carnelian
Banyan from Beryl to Hellman
Archibald from Highland to northerly City Limits
Hermosa from Lemon to northerly City Limits
Rochester from Foothill to Base Line
Etiwanda from Whitram to Highland
Miller Avenue from Etiwanda to easterly City Limits
Victoria from Etiwanda to East Avenue
4th Street from Cleveland to easterly City Limits (north side only)
�3
• CITY *F CUCAMONGA
SUMZ F PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT CITY STREET SWEEPING SERVICES CONTRACS
LOCATION CITY Wine (nESIGNATw Rouses)
DATE n..mh— 11 14"
CONTRACT NO.
Ll
.i
1HIAN0 0.
SWeePINC
—
R. F. 01RON
ITFNS
QUANTITIES
0I0
AMOUNT
810
AMOUNT
0.10
AMOUNT
B10
AT2)U1T
❑ID
At'OU1iT
GID
WRIU'+
Oidder's Bond
Total Monthly Charge
(4 Veeka
2.0.0.0.00
1.650.00
Hourly Rete
40.00
40..00
Curb Mile Rate
13.90
11.50
i
I
i
I
I
.i
0
E
•
STAFF REPORT V�
DATE: November 4, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Planned Community Maintenance Policy
1977
I have discussed with several of the Council over the past few
weeks the need to develop a policy for the maintenance of the
Planned Communities (PCs). This discussion was precipitated by
submittal of the Windrow Village tract map for the Victoria Plan-
ned Community. It is necessary that this policy be incorporated
into the conditions of the tract map approval. Attached for your
information is an original draft memo which was prepared to explore
options related to maintenance of the planned communities.
It was the consensus of various discussions that special Planned
Community Landscape Maintenance Districts shall be formed to main-
tain all parkways and trail elements within the P.C. This District
would be entirely independent of the current City -wide district
but will include major arterial landscaping.
In order to maintain the ability to assess for park maintenance,
it is recommended that parks be included within the P.C. District
with degree of assessment to be determined at the annual hearing.
The level is threfore up to the Council's discretion and can vary
from 0 to 1008.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council direct Staff to create separate
Landscape Maintenance Districts with the boundary of Planned Commu-
nities within the City.
Resp�e tfully submi ted,
Attachments
35
E
�J
•
L)K' r')
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 13, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Victoria Maintenance District Formation
The first phase of Victoria covering the Victoria Windrows Village has been
submitted by the Lyon Company. This precipitates the need to establish
a policy for maintenance of improvements in the Planned Community. Attached
for your information are copies of a summary of maintenance areas and a map
showing the areas concerned.
Three separate areas of potentially different benefit have been identified as
follows:
Exterior Arterials - (Highland Avenue) Are the usual type of parkway included
in the City -wide Landscape Maintenance District and could be annexed to that
district.
Loop Road and Interior Trails - are normally a homeowner responsibility or
a homeowners association.
Parks and Victoria Parkway - Assuming the oarkwav is a nspudn nark improve-
ment these facilities are currently maintained by the City General Fund.
The Council would therefore seem to have several options for maintenance,
- Annex all maintenance to the City -wide District
This option would considerably increase current cost to the City -wide
District.
- Create a Victoria Planned Community Maintenance District to cover all
maintenance in the planned community.
- Divide the Maintenance Approach Depending on Area of Benefit
This could add the exterior to the existing district, utilize a homeowners
association or Village Assessment District for trails and interior parkway
and create a Planned Community District for parks and Victoria parkway.
The divided approach relates maintenance cost more closely to benefit. The
major problem is that parks are currently maintained by the City General Fund
and will create a considerable burden upon future homeowners if included in
the District. The Council should be aware that maintenance of the facilities
proposed will be much greater than the current maintenance district and will
more likely result in political reaction at the time of public hearings to
set annual rates. To insulate the Council from a portion of this reaction a
homeowners association within the Village would be advantageous. The dis-
advantage of this approach would be loss of control of maintenance quality and
continued...
3�
Memo to City Council
Re: Victoria Maint. Dist,
October 13, 1981
Page 2
•
of course inconvenience to the developer in dealing with the homeowners
group.
CONCLUSION: Attached as Table A is an estimated per lot cost analysis
of each maintenance element for your information. Engineering would
recommend a divided assessment approach to include a Village Homeowners
Association. Victoria Parkway should be included in a Victoria Planned
Community Maintenance District. The proposed park maintenance should
should consider utilization of general funds for some portion of its
maintenance.
i
•
3?
LJ
•
TABLE A
VICTORIA MAINTENANCE ANALYSIS
Element Area Total Cost *Per Lot Cost
per year
Victoria Parkway
401,700
$140,510
$186.00
Loop Road
159,000
$57,700
$76.00
Highland Avenue
35,100
$12,500
$16.50
Trails
72,654
$24,796
$33.00
Park
8.0 Acres
$35,000
$46.00
TOTAL $270,863 $357.50
*VICTORIA WINDROW 756 lots
�G
y- H'-4ILANV AVr-Me
AIL
4NL
.'TH
— (,',r,-lYAT 9f11'(11
•
•
u
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 4, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
Zr c7.
3 p
• wM
1
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Traffic Signal Pro'2ct at Archibald and
Church and at Base L>_ne and Hel man
The above referenced traffic signal project, involving the use of
Federal Aid Urban funds, was physically completed some time ago
and has been operating satisfactorily since. Due to delays experi-
enced during construction, the contractor was assessed liquidated
damages in the amount of $2,500.
Ensuring appeals and correspondence has taken until this month, when
the contractor, Grissom and Johnson of Anaheim, agreed to the final
con LrduL mnount of $107,327.36.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the project as com-
plete and pass the attached resolution authorizing final payment of
$34,393.36 and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion.
fully submitted,
jaa
Attachments
• RESOLUTION NO. 51-171
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC
SIGNAL PROJECT AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET,
AND AT BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE AND AUTHOR-
IZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK AND FINAL PAYMENT.
WHEREAS, the construction of a traffic signal at Archibald
Avenue and Church Street, and at Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue has
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed,
certifying the work complete;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the work is hereby
accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice
of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County and the
Finance Director is authorized to pay the contractor all amounts due.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1981.
AYES:
• NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
•
Phillip D. Sch osser, May^
n
n
f t�l
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FAD PROJECT NO. MG- 3041(65)
i
PROPOSED FINAL ESTIMATE
Item Description
1 Base Line/ Hellman
2 Archibald /Church
TOTAL CONTRACT ITEMS
ADJUSTMENTS OF COMPENSATION
Change Order #1 Loops
Change Order 4.2 Ramp Removal
•
DEDUCTIONS
Liquidated Damages
(See Attachment No. 1)
IE
TOTAL CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS
TOTAL WORK DONE AND DUE
CONTRACTOR
H�
Amount
$53,850.00
$54,200.00
$108,050.00
$932.31
$845.05
$1,777.36
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$107,327.36
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FAU PROJECT NO. MG- 3041(65) •
Computed Liquidated Damages
Numbered
Days Date
Contract Approved 752 2/11/80
Working Days 120
Computed Date for
Completion 872 8/4/80
Total Working Days
Extention Approved 0
Extended Date for Completion 872 8/4/80
Contract Completed 926 10/22/90 •
Calendar Day Overrun 79
Days of Assessed Liquidated Damages 25 @ $100 = $2,500
Days of Non- Assessed Liquidated Damages = 79 - 25 = 54
This time involved minor work during satisfactory signal operation and did
not result in damage to the City. This minor work was delayed by City
processing of one change order involving concrete work and was not the
fault of the Contractor.
•
(ATTACHXENT NO. 1)
u3 ,
gw
t.
{�t
1
s
I
1.
a
CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA
FAU PROJECT 110. MG- 3041(65)
PROJECT PAYMENT ESTIMATE
Sh• y_ ofd_
Per lad N ._F UIr�
£5 [fna [e p FINfiI
Ogre 1 "15 -81
S rCI
WO.
ITEM
ONrr Or
MEASURE
Brl:MUD
RU.VIT'ITY
CONHIACT
PRICES
alticmAl.
AUTHORIZFXI
uia c
QUTNVITY
Vf)CUT
le"1L
QUANTITY
es n: c.TE
:. ^lot,T
1
Bale a ne /xo n „u�
L. s.
$51.850.00
$53.850.00
SN
2691.50
100;
57.950.00
I
.rchiWd /Eho,h
L.S.
54,200.00
54,200.00
5%
1710.00
1002
54,200.00
SUBTOTAL [ONTFACT ITEMS
E % % % % %%% % %%
%%E% % %XdKC % %%%
%% % % % %%% %%).,
% %%%%%,,XXXXXKX:
ST
5402.$0
I DR. O50.nU
Ad S. C.p .... tlo0
%XXXK%%XX %X
%X%%%%%%%%%%XX
%%%%%%xxx.0
%%%%%X %X%%%% % %'%X
(2500)
(2500)
Extra Work
%%RX% % %%%:f%
%K[%:xnxxxxxxx
%%% %%%%%%%:::%%%%%
%%%%%%%X%:%%
1777.36
1,777.36
Original Contract Amt,
ILYX%%%%:L.%]L
TOTAL WORK COl1PLETEO
X%XXXSXESXX.%%
%%%X % % %E%%%%
%XX.X % %X% % %X.
X%%%%%%%%%% % % %.%%
10E Retemtlom
%X%[ %X%% %%%.%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
mxxu%%X%%.X:f%%%..X%
HIA
TOTAL PAYMENT
%%%%%%%%E%%.
% % % % %%%XX%X%%%
%%%%R%%%%
%%%IpX %%%%%% %%
%%
t+axc Enc
APP rov�
I -II -flO
Working I
120
Oat. NaM1
S t.aaeJ
4 -19 -g0
Fat ln., .
date for
CO.,IC11..
8 -4 -80
6bather :.
rk ln�•
Jays
cool,v, t
1 h,"e IL
JAYS 0
I'rrcaot
c..,P lbt.J
100
Ye
ifmc F.1 aP
100
B R K✓✓!� E . a fi n .... • r�M 'CR1T u ^ 77 Ln... a Ri e q 11,
i•.
W�
i
;i`
0
•
nimv nn n A w11.1n nrrn ., \rnv.n
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 4, 1981
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds
• A-1
S.A. 79 -01 - located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street
OWNER: Community Baptist Church
P.O. Box 242
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701
Reduction of Improvement Security Instrument from
$51,000 to $25,500.
As provided in the Security Instrument for the above referenced project,
upon final completion and acceptance of the required work, the City will
release any portion not needed as security. The $25,500 will be held
for six months as the Labor and Material portion of the Security.
h'i
0
=s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November A, 1981
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
BY: Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary
F1
SUBJECT: REpUEST FOR CONTINUANCE - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION_
DECISION FOR THE PREPARATION 0 AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 11933
1977
Mr. Dick Scott, developer of Tentative Tract No. 11933,has expressed
an interest in continuing the appeal filed on the Planning Commission
decision of August 26, 1981 which required the preparation of an En-
vironmental Impact Report. A copy of the anticipated letter requesting
continuance will be forwarded to the Council prior to the meeting.
Staff will further advise Council of any changes.
Respectfully sub fitted,
Jack Lam, AICP
Community Development Director
JL:jk:jk
/Jl
0
CITY OF RANCI-10 CUCANn\UA
STArr REPORT
DATE: November 4, 1981
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 - LAWLOR
A request for a change of zone from R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 20,000
for the development of Tentative Tract No. 10210 - APN 1061-
172 -03
Related Item: Tentative Tract No. 10210
ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 23, 1981,
held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above zone change
request. The Planning Commission, after reviewing staff's recommendation
and conducting a public hearing, has adopted Resolution No. 81 -107 which
reccmmends adoption of the above - described zone change. This zone change
will allow the development of 33 single - family residences. The Planning
Commission also adopted Resolution No. 81 -106 approving Tentative Tract
Map No. 10210 and all conditions of approval related to that development.
The approval of the Tentative Tract Map is contingent upon approval of
the zone change by the City Council. Attached is a copy of the September
23, 1981 Planning Commission Staff Report which fully describes the zone
change request. If the City Council concurs with the change of zone,
two actions are required; 11 adoption of a Negative Declaration by
minute action, and 2) approval of the Zone Change through adoption of
the attached Ordinance.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice has been placed in the Daily Report newspaper
advertising this as a public hearing and notices were sent to property
owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries. Attached please find
a copy of a letter from an adjacent property owner objecting to this
project. In addition, at the Planning Commission public hearing, one
person spoke in opposition to the proposed change of zone request. The
Planning Commission felt that the proposed average lot size of 36,000
sq. ft. is appropriate for this site; however, cautioned the applicant
that his subdivision to the north would require substantially larger
lots.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the
attached Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 81 -01 and issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
`4aAUm'M1 P�t �_
Director of Community Development
ejLQrdinance, Plann1n2 Commission Resolution No. 81 -1
ng Commission Staff Report of Septem er
!47 1
ORDINANCE NO. 15?
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
1061- 172 -03 LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAPPHIRE AND ALMOND, FROM R -1 -14 ACRES TO R -1- 20,000
SQUARE FEET,
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
• C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor Parcel Number 1061- 172 -03, approximately 14
acres in size and generally located on the northwest
corner of Sapphire and Almond, is hereby changed to
R- 1- 20,000 (single family residential on minimum
20,000 square foot lots).
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSENT:
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -107
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE
N0. 81 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM
R -1 -14 ACRES TO R- 1- 20,000 SQUARE FEET FOR 14
ACRES LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAPPHIRE AND ALMOND - APN 1061 - 172 -03.
WHEREAS, on the 6th day of July, 1981, an application was
filed and accepted on the above described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of September, 1981, the Planning
Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section
65854 of the California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following findings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses per-
mitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and
compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding
area;
2. The proposed zone change would not have significant
impact on the environnent nor the surrounding properties;
and
3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the
existing and proposed General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the
environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on
September 23, 1981.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California
Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
23rd day of September, 1981, Zone Change No. 81 -01.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 81 -01.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall
be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
l
l
Resolution No. 81 -101
Page 2
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 23rd day of September, 1981 by the following vote
to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Dahl, Rempel, Tolstoy
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: King
•
r
•
0
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 23, 1981
TO: MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
r
a
z
U' >
19'7 1
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE N0. 81 -01 - LAWLOR
request for a change of zone from R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 20,000
sq. ft. for the development of Tentative Tract No. 10210 - APN
200 - 061 -12, 200- 051 -06, and 1061 - 172 -03
Related Item: Tentative Tract No. 10210
ABSTRACT: A change of zone from R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 20,000 sq. ft. lots
is requested for a portion of land within the proposed Tentative Tract No.
10210. If the Commission made a favorable recommendation on the approval
of Tentative Tract No. 10210, then it would be appropriate to recommend a
Chan',- of z,...c for this poriiun of property to the City Council.
BACKGROUND: A change of zone is only for a small portion of the project
site and is generally located in the southeast quadrant of the project site
1Exhibit "A "). The project site is presently vacant and undeveloped and is
General Planned as Hillside Residential. The Hillside Residential category
of the General Plan indicates that density shall not exceed more than 2 units
per acre. The request for change of zone can be found consistent with the
General Plan based upon its unit density and based upon the Commission's
determination that the proposed density would conform to the policies and
goals of the Hillside Residential category.
This change of zone will also require the finding of no significant adverse
impacts upon the environment and the recommendation of issuance of a Negative
Declaration to the City Council. If the Commission found the proposed den-
sity of Tract No. 10210 acceptable and consistent with the General Plan, then
it is recommended that the Commission recommend issuance of a Negative Dec-
laration.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was posted in the newspaper and
notices wEre mailed to surrounding property owners. A written letter of ob-
jection was submitted by Charles E. Morgan and is attached for your review.
Mr. Morgan also provided public testimony at the meeting of August 12, 1981.
Staff Report •
ZC 81 -01 (TT 10210) -2- September 23, 1981
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a
i
Pub — s hearing to receive all public input and comment. Upon conclusion of
the public hearing, if the Commission finds the zone change consistent with
the General Plan and City policies, a Resolution is attached for your review
and consideration which recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration and
approval of Zone Change No. 81 -01 to the City Council.
Respe4A'M, ubmitt/ed,
JA CP
Dire ctor of Community Development
JL:MV: cd
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Letter from Mr. Moroan •
Resolution
S^
0
•
f
• E",�OpiNo NRTloNAI F�FE6r
�a
/��
•
ZONE GlfAN(�E
E1-01
SINCoe FAmmy
46 mipeYt3
�R- I- 12Rtf\c I
V V
NORTH
CITY OF 11I;,,, zoNe 6HAN6t- NQ- fl-ol
1p RA\CI-IO CUCA'IO.\CA TITLE: CATION MAP
PLANNING DIV61ONT G\I IIISIT _ W SCALE - N.7.s•
C
.1inchc Cucamongs Planning Ccsmis3l, :n
'' -j2C nasal ins Avenge
Rancho 9soa•_o ^.gs
0entl sme::
92k Al.xn
.Alta Lou, Ca 91701
.lust g, 111%
de: ]iv tronxent%1 asaessm�:t
and tentstive tract 1 ^210
3avirurnmantal asses"Mt
and zone chengs'o. 81-CS
Lsw10 r
I wtah to formally object to the density of the proposed tract IC210.
..rw:...,. .: ,�.;. the area In rsuestion is part of the hillside area of Alta Loa% and
is not coddwcive t0 ode -half acre parcels.
I now refer spacittcally to the %pn1tcati=9 for subdivision and sore
change for =:5 acres represanttnr tl.e Southern portion of tract 10210.
?ortiors of the area ern n,.:tte 3tescp -W act rally _'aasntle for
toil din r. ?articulsrly lots '2, i?, Jl {, i11 and 1.6. In arias to
bufid in this are%, ^:sasiva c:ttSrg -ni filling ^ou13 t;%vs •- b3 !one
•x-i the stq'tlity of •':e terrain i3 In qu soticn since it io'ia. edlstaiy
t3 the ^lull lire.
3 -,ally imrorttrt is the eathotic bev:t., o the htllaide and
.a rim. aril. Ara •vt to reglsoo the ratursi terrain with donee voftonal
is io cot ob'act to prrgraes, only •A the density of that progress. Fy
9r•1, ai:nzvnt n tie inet, is zoned iv -31-12 %area. 'fie load sd /econt
., t::e 1:ortaeist 13 .'.::a::' -l. .o 't3 1 +'est Sa adilii:ael :: -1 :.:a :; v::i
vacs.. la n)
iu '.al:trz t ',he lord o'.ner3 lziedi%toly ad;acent to `.ha sub,'aat
nsr_e1, I feund 'hit the cence. sus is that the area, titan it to
davelonad, should be in nnrcels no lees thin 2 acres, Jae to the nntura
of the land, lle owner immediately sdjacmt to the :lest indicated that
'• - "'
his plan was to engineer his Iand for j acrd parcels within the Z:calyctos
grove to t'r,a $oJth and 2 sore parcila in the cleared sees to the l:orth.
ti'.e land over to the 1forth has indicatod dint narcAs of 2 acre
minimum wsuld be deslreble, het has no izes•lista plane for develornmt.
So, we have aurro. nMInZ lend c•mars wit: 2 acre tercel thin:drg. 70o3
it seen rei3on I'll .1 b alicw ono4,3if lore zoning in the •siddla a: this?
I t4ink oat.
Further, if the iraa'ti r -ine•1 to 3-1- 1:=',,0, as request id, the o•.r:er
of the satl.ct ire ;1 .in:lt tB an r&3-tb ^it a mat cap with onorrii`
acre late 4.:stsoi cn 'i;e fop ••roxiontely three - uirtir acre lots on this
%rrliC]tiorl, •r.triby incraasiag t,n 1,w3Lty mall further.
•
•
-z-
Re: Lnvironsertol sa3assnont
ad tr..tative tract 10210
• Eaviron- ezntai 99ee3eo] t
and zone change 170. 31--ol
L swlo r
In addition, thaat ortion of tract 10 ?30 net `:einr considered at
.hie tile, couii later be sutdividad into ene- 1 ^.aif earn cereals
numbering over 2C0. 0an Cne city provide t:.e services necessary for
a development of this size with one means of access, Sap;hira Street?
The addition of ;5 unite in th As aria would add aop rozimat sly j5
.r,.. more vehicles or day down Sapphire street„ ubich in already loa3ed
y,.x.47 ' '.with vehicular traffic. 'That -is a minimum of 150 additional vehicles
Der day at the intersection of Smppaire and Almond.
In relation to drainage, the appliasnt stste3 in his gmeral notes,
its- 10, thst I' is enposed to drain the lot3 to the street as Much
as c^_ssibler. *:i•ffi tilat vol ASe of wator flowing down aR 9 and l
cr'i'.'a re3ohid .0 mond street, it will raise havoc with the land on the
sopt'^ aide of Al _ ::, sift o, Zmorld i9 fror..93ed tO 'a coved only half -
wldth aiti: nO curb3 and $Jtters on the S-u1,• aide.
I fL rther otject to the 201 aquastrian easel,nt on the -�eatern
tcandsr, of tie carnal. I do not object to hor3e poonle, but I do
W set to the rat. rcrclea and off -road vrr,lcles ',fie mould surely
wei ca:a, this acCe3s t0 the m ^.Rntsin area. A 3izaatle nrotlam already
.
eRivta 'Ath this t "••C of trOOO9a'.in<• For ailch 9,: eevemaxlt to be
fee =mime, it Am J1i 615 to be fanned end regulated in some =anner so
.a restriet it to h. r93 ^aorle Only.
•
The forsping objectiona and cOmmt3 ranrossnt not only my thinking —...
.— _._ —....
_
Sat that of the adjscant lad ownera ad a Goodly number of residsnts
in the ianellste area,
Sincerely, I
Mi arl is i. ii)rg9R v
J+
., rvw;�
_
-t
501
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -106
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE •
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10210
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10210, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Lawlor Enterprises, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as approximately 46 acres
of land located on the northwest corner of Sapphire and Almond and being
divided for single family use into 37 lots, regularly came before the
Planning Commission for public hearing and action on September 23, 1981;
and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Div isions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
does resolve as follows:
CCucamonga
StCl1GN 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10210 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;---
-
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of develop-
ment proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
C
.
Resolution No, 81 -1o6
Page 2
C (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
• environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10210, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. All necessary easements for cross lot drainage shall be
shown on final map and grading plan.
2. All requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District
such as, but not limited to, fifty foot clearance of
flamable material around all units, fire retardant
building materials, appropriate water supply and fire
lane to Turquoise, shall be met. In the removal of
flamable material, inflammable material should be
planted.
3. Construction of a new forest service road shall be done
in conformance with conditions set forth by the Forest
Service.
4. Full compliance with the State Alquist - Priolo Act is
required for construction and placement of dwellings.
5. Full compliance with the Cucamonga County Water District
for construction of the water system, is required.
6. The forest service easement shall be extended to the
eastern edge of the property, north and adjacent to this
tract.
7. Equestrian access to open spaces shall be provided where
feasible.
8, The applicant shall work with the utility comnanies
having easements over the subject property, to develop
the easement areas for useable open space, such as an
equestrian staging area. A detailed plan shall be
submitted to and approved by the Design Review Committee
prior to recordation of map.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
9. Installation of an adequate concrete lined interceptor
drain across the southeasterly project area as shown on
the tentative map shall be required to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. The drain shall be extended south-
westerly to connect to the existing Almond interceptor
drain. The storm drain fees for the project shall be
credited towards the cost of this drain.
7 1
Resolution No. 81 -i06
Page 3
C10. All required on -site and off -site easement for the drain •
shall be dedicated to the City. The easement shall be
extended northeasterly along the Edison easement line to
the easterlymost tract boundary.
11. A flood protection berm and /or a channel shall be pro-
vided along the north lot lines of lots 16, 17, 18, 30,
31, 32, 33 and 34, diverting storm runoff to a safe
disposal area.
12. Construction of Almond Street improvements with curb,
gutter, 26' wide asphalt concrete pavement, A.C. berm
along south side, and street lights within a dedicated
easement shall be required from the east tract boundary
to Sapphire Street.
13. Emergency access road per Foothill Fire District's
requirements shall be provided along Almond Street to
Turquoise Street.
14. All conditions contained in the letter by the Forest
Service, United States Department of Agriculture,
referenced 5460 Schulhof dated Jun 22, 1981 shall be
comoiied with. The existing Big Tree Road shall be,
Cvacated prior to recordation of the map.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981. •
L
PLAINNINC COMMISSION OF THE CIT,? OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JAM,' LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
reqularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 23rd day of September, 1981 by the following vote
to -wit:
i-2'
4
41
4
Resolution No. e1 -106
Page 4
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS:
Sceranka, Dahl, Rempel
Tolstoy
None
King
�G
A.
a. \
WI BEPgRTPSHI OF tbilp]XITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
Subject: Tentative Tract NET. 10210
Apnuune: LAW.L aOR �� ���,,
Locati on :llC,.�aPPtLlr4ilOS1�1111Qnd
Those Items checked are conditions of approval.
APPLICANT Su LL CONTACT TIE PLA'1'e11K CMSIVI FOR EOI IMCE MITN THE TOILMINO
MEMOS:
OS:
Site BereloMrcnt
�( 1. Site shall he developed In accordance with the approved %Ile plans on file
In the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
1. Pa",ad site plans area bu11dir, devitiens Inccrporoting ail Condill.ns Df
�— approval shall be sulmitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
g. Approval of this request shall not waive covollance with ell sections of
We Turing ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
tine of Building Permit I ... ante.
4. lie developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for
RdIrution Vehicle storage p.rsmnt to City standards.
S. Trash ,dr,I,d Ir areas :nett he encl.sed by A 6 foot high masonry mall with
six. tin, grtes pursuant to City standards. location shall be
Inflect to approval by the Planning 9fri ii on.
6. A sample of tine roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Bieltion
for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
_ 1, All roof appurtenances, Including air coM itioners. shall be arthitectu ally
integrated, spiel Ced from III. Ad the sound buffered from adjacent proper [i ds
and streets As required by the Planning and Building Divisions.
X S. Peter to any n of the project site or auslness activity being coreduced
thereon, all conditions of aIIPI.ill contained herein shall be cempleted to
the s,tIiIIdtdA of the Director Of Community Develmovent.
_ 9. This approval shalt tuba a mull And void sf building {canes are not issued
for this project within one year from the dale of project approval.
_ 10.
&!,a Condii5 seal n,, Permit this project shall bed Care null and vole In
, I.trats (10) mmths from dale of approval, unless permits are Issued or
sae ipprmved is m*pletea.
_ 11. A drGslid lighting plan snail be mhmittad to And approved by the Plannlnn
plr Ht➢n prove to ,,,1... DL Ivltdinq pl'emil1. Such plan Shall Indicate
""s. Ilhrni na tfnn, I- Il.rn, hryht and method of shielding. no lignting
shall adversely affect adjacent nrepertic..
B.
_ 11. All s. nmq Doa tinttallea at the l4me of initial development shall be
Soler N^,a tea.
IT. I— In,ieri PC6 .... fin pathway. acmts circulation aisles shall be provided
......post the dt'vi'lor'ienf 1p Conned dwellings with .Pen PIC" I'd -
.e-aIlou.1 mil.
1
Pr.,� TR 10210 .
_
14. All trash pick up shall be for Individual units with all receptacles Shielded
From puLlio vie., if no centralited trash receptacles are cared coed.
15. Standard pats...... plans chin) be submitted to and epr,o ed by ire City
planner and Building Official prior to a:wpaaq of tic fv.t unit.
16. All builaling'z number{ and Individual units shall be a.enttrled In A Clear
and Concise mamier, i.Cluding proper Oivminet con.
17. Solid Core ealerior doors. security dead bolts and Iooll SMIt M installed
on each unit in this project.
X 19. Security devices such as wl.dw locks :Tall be Installed on each wait.
19. All units fthlA this aevelopaent shall be proplumbed to be add ±tad for A
[nisi water Mabnq unit.
_ 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are r - rtS to m
incorporated Into this Project to incm]e s n tnrr TZ as Luc net unites to
reduced consumption shower heads, better niece of i euletlsn, dautle paned
winds,,:, extended aver hangs, 9il of sass appliances. ale.
11. This development shall provide en option to hone buyers to purchase A solar
water paAlo, unit.
X 21. Emergency secondary access shall to o aided to ems tract to tte satis-
faCtion of fr. Foothill Eire Protidtien District.
X 2g. Ln"I and Matter Planned Enuez4ian Trails s *all be rr.nd-d In.ou;hri+l the
tract in AdCOrdanCe with the ECuestfian Trail Pis- T. l+•valed r Lrst, nn
[rail plan indicating uIdthl, r { -rn sl of es. tnYS {cal ccndi lifins. 1-1—O
and ..edit Control, in accordance with MY e.ues:r tin frail Steneardi, shall
be submitted to and approved by the City Pla.mer prier to approval and
recordation of the final uap.
X 24. This tract shall form or annex to a mairter.ance district for maintenance of
-- egceslrten tra,I,.
X 29. Stmet panes shall be reviewed and aPProvd V, the Cil, plena¢., in attordiol,
with the adapted Street Xining Ca ip. print to atpro.al dud .....Cat," of
I'm final map.
X 26. If this develolmnt intends to restrict eau -fib ion n n-al rrialrd v
to Specific Isis or pr.MIT,, la
hrt t. a vNl, In a c.. v L
1l tie C- k R/e
mast Oe subullled to and revle.rd by the City Main— pnnr Co approval of
final map.
_ 27. TV ass project stall provide ant of aift,da ^le heusi•g indror
inn. io C-11 C, .ith GrM ra lr N nnsann. ice C'rs anf Ile n .,,q
Criteria 3,111110 m the Grp +[t bra ^y +ant 0i", t Fi preapil ill s call
be dete..niued by < rut r- ' ei set x1111. r its an.f -.1n 1 lurk at
the tine of C.ns Vwcum ofllre Troy I, •In t s -ell be
approved by the City Planner price to isswnCe of hu.ldnngperits.
Pa r41n b vehicular Ace
1 All lwrking lot Iaodl,,prd island, Stall rove a r. mr „nn onside dimenl,.o
Of 5' eIA shall contain an Ill- vIlk adlaeent to P.nrs rrr9 SL.11.
1. Parking lot trees shell be a .1niwm li gallon site.
g. All two -way aisle Odin, shall be a minimum of 26 feet ride.
a. Emergency access shall Le provided, maintenance free and clear, a mlrim,n
of 24 feel wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill
File District ......emen[s.
S. All parking spaces shall be double striped.
6. All units snail be Provided vlth aptomatic garage door openers.
1. Designated visitor parking areas $call be turf blocked.
D. The Covewnts, Codes and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of re eeti...I
vehicles on this site unless they are the Principle source of trinsporlatfon
for the ..,.a,I
9. an Parting Vall be permitted within the interior eirmlatim, ills le fiber tham
in nesignalyd visitor pa :king arras. Covenants. Cadet, anal nesl.ictinns
III) Le drvrl up :'J 1•y ter: AppllCanl and submitted to the CiL, Planning
olvillnn prior to issuance of building perm)ls.
C. L_nm upinrJ
X 1. A detailed lnnnvicepe end irrigation plan shall be submitted to and is reveal
by one Planning DSaiflon Prior 10 11, issudnce o/ ,silting pe mf(t.
2. Eai Sting trees 31.111 be retained wherever Possible. A master plan of
e, yllug trey, `n —og taro- 1-rc Ste location, Si a and type smell be
gwool. tea ay LLe ar'reloper. Sala plan shall late let- account the proposed
rading, ,.hat bras a e to be .naiad., 1.1AIng M•tnhal, and where n:
trees will Lc planted for rq,l acr,nent or rt wed trees. Tile plan is required
to be tuhmilted to ama approved by the Planning Division prior to approval
of the final gran Sng Plan.
x 1 Street trees, a min s mud of 16 gallon site or larger, shall be Installed in
accordance ,Ash ill, hatter flan of street tries for Elie City of Rancho
C.'avmya A. "ba "111 be plm,ted At an 111ra9e of every 30' on interior
streets and 20' on ..tenor streets.
_ a. A minimum of 50 trees per grass acre, cm:prised of the following ills.
shall to prcvfard .,thin the development; 20--24' has or larger, 201 -15
gallon• and 10:-5 gallon.
x S. All landscaped areas stall be maintained in a healthy and thriving con -
ditfon, free from weeds• train, and aehris.
6. All store ,.inks In 'all" of five (5) feet In vertical height and of 5;1 t r
gfcaler tittle shall be landscaped and irrigated m accordance .sill slnbe
Planting r.4n:rrmrnts of SLe City of Ranc no Cncar,onga. 5QLP slope planting
Shall 1n CI VJa• but not be listed to rootlet ground cover a::d appropriate
"Ini.l mid .rocs. All 'call planting and vrl ratio spell t•c onlin r ""
ri nla,ned In A nealthy a,,, ll.rivtng mna,tmn by the dmelo... until each
pdn Ll ,al amt is sold and otcuplld by the bun•.. Pri ar to rrlea cling
ncrvPonry for tnn;e mots• an 1.1pellion of U,e ;tor "s shall he le gilled
by Vr elarning S111( to deteinine that it is In tatlsleclnry cent a {nn.
Y` 2. bellll r, uS yAStocietaionaor a,1." ii n3 is t[,p,,Dlc lot Hart il.it a Soils pact(
or mmb wn¢ shall be Sul.mtted IT the City prior to issuance of building
turn.: tam
R. Il.e fri.t yard la :%JIcj, sag, and an aPllc,rlalc Irfigat)nn Srslr9, 'hall be
In:lan.d by lime n.v.loorr In e,,t,,b tr .,,I, iu� -stied Phan:.
Project tra. rT 1021+
�+. 9. The final design f the perimeter Parkways. YallS. langseap,nq and side.
walls shall be included In the re•IV Ved Iands,IM Deans ant shall be
subject to approval by ine psenninq D.u......
lo. n miffier, of s of tell trees Planted within the Drojttt, shall be
specimen sIad Vest.
11. 5recial land3ape features sots as mnundinq, elluv ul m6. s n size
Incas, r� +ode nog s,te.dl1s ,,"ill •:th weed gilt and bG , nn till tna rTr) doe
1 tensi flea lan:ficaryng, s d tor,
X L Lny signs Inopn3ed fn• this di—I•mn ^nh shall 4e des. n,d in coal o......
nit' Or Cu :y :.nevi (re Sign hs,na ,, and H all an] aPyoral
by the Pt Jnnsr9 Division prmr to installation of ,m, II _,
2. A uniform: s,,A Vmgnw ear "is „ .NOry not 'L: l l 4• -, ttrd In
p nell-1 division Snr Eisele r. view ant Jl :prnval peter Ia I14 Vane of
e
n. siding pe,n,ts.
]. me silts on sill :; ^d nt an on, arr'r.td ..in In
APPfal and 1 111 i'e4ulre separate sign levier em, is
ov
Psd,_t_ien_a_l bpnrm'al1 prism red
I. Oevulolmem Revier scan be acmTPM1 t ^rd fair, to tre
N -rollt. w na ce nil . Don din
2. orelelm nn Peripu Shall be a «o' :lilted prior in re- md,t,ce of the final
sn!•t mivon al".
x 2. App -cal of llentil n.r Trsct I:n. 101210.s granoe t.., rc m v
armZnfle ..ShdugP..�o�fll- ol___ —_ —__- .e ere. arcs
a. This Cond"boat use remelt is grantee Ica A rv,,,Ad cl mon-lill
which time the P) an.Ing Cemnisv cis ear lea d. de: +:e . - - -- It
the Conditional Usr onu:.,us rm ..mate
X S. use de'llsl•er it rc4, +,red to opt, ,c the fotlo:.mp s ,re s :e:e -hit by
a.rt ba se s of hones vn,cb have A acid a fr 1 Wl+c ..asbr, Lail c
d]a<en [r[o their P,crertr. n Or
In Pnrcblainq lbe nom IccatM c': tot i -alt _
11:.• ra :. C.f. 6 n :nd
,AJen tao0 LM1yt slid -roe -- 'r • - T „4,1 r
eoa tsr the Purpose or it l nxmgueovett ^An Ere I a t peal
gain ec a .
Signed _
Iu,cba a[
Said statsmanl is to be (,led by the Jewel Doer .qn pr ...y prior to
occoPancy.
6. P„nr to I'lleval and ,e e,dat,o.i of the l,_I ”
bmle.mg perv: ts, ea e, n, 1vtd n, n, P -io• i e,tmrce of
Lin JI1 at(e; [ed 5:n m1 C Sion alp is invnl nd• „rl [tr•, ncrrliti al."m
dint. • 11,11 Ili ;.t llle.e Is Ice b-rs•t -e
[n nor C v, to ne,t ,:•leis tn: ..... ar
.mina o-ng �a ,a ..all ^nit ,t,a .,
Ieuer of"", te l: ncalim n•�n b r•,;,,t. r_0
1--l' ,. 9^ eve's ;, n. ; .... t, ...I n ,o .,min
pro mats. 'an r ssiu n,- or pent is m Re Cafe of Ill Cta�' +en .iu n!ial
• i 0
F.
l.'
..
. X 1, prior to moOn.o ,d and recordation of the final nay, or prior to the Issuance
of bundlnd permits .Len of (11+ i5 Involved, written certification bail tl.t
J(re<1(] water Jr if rte s. that odcivate tv`sn'r and wa(e( la(rll " J e a,
will :let ` pro ", grad C: shill be 5 [Ir•
,von, c C..� nqY (ea lv: ,n t. Soon letter nt navel help f :It by
IFC .ltertdr4nRtn pIn .v, i6O) rhos prior 'e final a apyr oval r
tee c Lf i of K'r mr[5 In tea lose Sol all emir rl
a +till V•oJ +'Ctsronfar J et, ti a rng Sylle tlnL flilltles alia.ahle
CYSInc ante r Poponal LI", Got al Bard one toe C.Iv'
n tit cut lcn Hof a ehtfbilI ty. sncludio, all Supportive irrfornmVC,, gall
be obtJln,j jdf SutnirttN to life City.
X 0. inns ap;Imal stall P",—! nut� and vole it the tentative sdbdivsslon iwp
1, not'oe"eJ av r•o :r : :e:: or bunting golds itsnee when no v.A rt
In. al, r I... Ise (123 ",1!" rr.n tin .,1 of th .tact
units& an ant. :•,oa ..t ne— 9: ¢lea Lr Ile Planning Cumrmstian�
X 9. This zubYVivon w2S not z Etta as a tatal development Package and IS
regu i. e] b 1, far a rot ratios rclatva to cat design se of
tLt Gc t O.dul+ a rrraf to linel ...Cval a .loam. of
&rte 11 1( 1-1 SS.t:IIIIlcn 55 1.1 to be Ses e{aJCd a5 trattrhunes.
APPLICA'IT SHALL CG'GACT ➢•F BUILCI : :G )NISIOX EOB COMPLIA.'ICE WITH THE IOLLWnIG
cauSnc'a:
Situ_
X 1. ice at of oa,t Aall comply lack the latest Scanted BMforw Building Code.
U,i,c,,- hens. real Get, cnfurn PId.Ibin, Code, :rational Electric Code, and
all co— rclDle C.Jes and DNin —cal in effect at the Into of iI,.a.,e
D. rel.r eve Lem l[S.
X 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for wvbuttlble Construction. evidence
na
-- sil to v :.d to the F4d1brll 9rstfrct Fire Chief that temlorary water
u,I, for rrrv' l'ra etc [r Cn IS ieJ ltd Ll e, pending Cpmpl,,I.. of required
fve pratuarun to St Ct.
X 1. Pear to the issuance of a building perell for a new residential dwelling
nit(t) Or 'lair, II.Ificn to a existing unit(5) 'herapplllo" thrall Vay
d %.sly ant 1 -1 a taelllC J r uch feet may include, tin[ not
to treed to: City t 2eaptafrCRmn Fat, P e: fee, Drainage Feb, $ystem,
evelll ant Fee. Per:vt and flail CneCbin, sets. and SCtwl Fees.
a. Prior to the issuance of a building PL'mlt for a pew cxSed al or Industrial
Jevelc ::ienl o addition to an :1sid, i.vtloJment. the applicant Shall Pay
feel at t1a a llilhea rote_ uch ices 11 include, hit 'I"
to l :s,ted to: S,Ste -IS Glu aloe .on, fat, Drainage fee. Perim( and Plan
C.rIIIu, Feet.
X 5. Sweet ..dresses shall be povelil by the Dmldsng aM CI.I.
_X 6. Pet M1n, units shall to [antlr.cted ..In fire retardant material and non
(Li:.Itti Lle hurt nate:ial.
_ 1, All c —ILn,S stall have the Wilaing elevation facing the "'Let
upira,.J with otdstronal war, trls around winao.s and vuod ilJ ing or elem-
ent wb re al Pr.urute.
6 it[�.1r Strv[tur s_
_ 1. Provi.lr compliance with the IMlfvm Building Code for property line clmnntes
[]ktldering use. area and li rt` -rtt It li vane tt of etltlin, building&.
2. Eaiuio, bundrn,(S) sbell be pact, Lo toe ply with Surfeit Building and
Ian ... ... c"tlo.s for Ste Interpol) use or She building Shall be demolished.
J. (.I'll-, stage dit1m,.1 laUh ties Shall tit re: ovee, (filed end /nr tapped
to C'.01, ..to [be cmfom PIL14m9 Code, and uniform Building (ode.
•
project nd. TT 10210
M. Gradls
1. Grading tat the subject property Shall he In a torch.- with the neif.re
Building Ce :le, City &reel., Standard& and a eepou grading VTae[ieet, Lht
final grading plan shall be In substantial conror.mce with the approved
conceptual grading plan.
X 2. A Soils report ]hail be prepared by J Suallflid eortkeer Ilcepsed by the
Sto Le 0' California Ia Perform Soon work.
X 0. A geological retch[ (hall he prepared by a guff Died engineer or geologist
and subnittbd at the thee of ...1,,atlon for grading plan check.
X 4. The final grading plan Shall be Subject to r and approval by the
Go o
Goad., committee and Shall be completed p, iarl to recomatmn of the ftnel
solid ivls ion nsp or Issuance of building Streit ,hichevar (owes first.
X S. As a cusmn -lot rvbdl,dice, the following renuircmenu Shall to het
A. S.,AI, tluill be po Seed and an agrten,en[ ciC LU [Cd, gu a,,vt,eih, Ccm,lttt.a,
of all on -site drainage facilities n(ce S nary for Jena :ering all parcel S.
to the satisfaction of tee Building and Safety Division-
1, Appropriate easements, for Safe disposal of eralnsge water that are
ciedoctee unto or ovee aajactnt pe reel s, are to be delineated and
recorded to the satisfaction of the BuilJSng and Safety OiYnlon.
C. On -site drainage Smpro rents, c ary for acwater ing or protecting
the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to it s ua n ce or
building permits for Construction upon any Parcel that my be
to, or mntnbates to, drainage flows enter Ing, leaving or within a
parcel relative to which a building pemit is requested.
d. final grading plans for each parcel are to be sphatted to the Building
and Safety Division for approval prior to Issuance of building Serelfs.
(this Im1, be on ad Incfces"Il or too,osile basis.)
I. All slope banks in excess of five (5) that in vertical height and of
5:1 or greater slope snail be Seeded with native grasses n cn,letc.
of sorting ng o r
other alternative nrtLGd of n untrola :all
Le cuxv,+fe [te to the satisfaction of the ➢mldingofficial. Irrigation
sliall be V,.,Id,d to germinal, the seed and namtaid growth to J mint
6 months after ,arm ination.
APPLtCARt ShALL CDIITAET 111£ FnLtllE£RInG DIYIS1O9 FOR UMPLIID2E Willa TIIE FOLLOWING
COHI1ITlcn5:
1. Dedications and veninular— ACC_as
1. Dedic.tmnz Shan be made by final pep of au Interior streat rignls-
af..,y arld 111 nett S.ary ealemeii[t at 0— on Ific tentative eu V.
_X 2. Ralcation shall be made of the fallowing right- of-v.ay on the following
Streets:
_33 additional feet an Almond St._
Additional feet on
additional fee[ a
___X ,. Corner property line radius will be reguifN per City standards.
_ a. All rights of vMlralar Ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated
IS follows:
5. Reciprocal easements Shall be provided ensuring access to all parcel,
over private roads, drives. or parking areas, acid shall be noticed on
the map I, Shall be recorded on.,..redt �1th the map. •