Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1981/11/18 - Agenda Packet
Wednesday, November 18, 1981 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. ' ? 'r A. Pledge of Allegiance. • B. Roll Call: Frost '`, Mikels Y, Palombo r,, Bridge r�, and Schlosser. C. Approval of Minutes: October 7, 1981 and October 21, 1981. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Tuesday, November 17, 6:00 p.m. - Etiwanda Specific Plan Meeting - Etiwanda Intermediate School, Community Room, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. b. Advisory Commission meeting has been cancelled for the month of November. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR, L The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -11 -18 in the amount 1 of $551,638.46. b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for F. Gail Squires 4 8068 Calle Carabe Place for wine broker license. c. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Johnny R. 5 Winters, 9134 Foothill Blvd for on -sale beer and wine eating place. d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Beverly J. 6 and Frank A. Lyons, 8241 Foothill Blvd for on -sale general eating place and caterers permit. CJTY OF j RANCHO (UCANKIN" r 0 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENEA U > 1077 Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga Wednesday, November 18, 1981 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. ' ? 'r A. Pledge of Allegiance. • B. Roll Call: Frost '`, Mikels Y, Palombo r,, Bridge r�, and Schlosser. C. Approval of Minutes: October 7, 1981 and October 21, 1981. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Tuesday, November 17, 6:00 p.m. - Etiwanda Specific Plan Meeting - Etiwanda Intermediate School, Community Room, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. b. Advisory Commission meeting has been cancelled for the month of November. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR, L The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -11 -18 in the amount 1 of $551,638.46. b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for F. Gail Squires 4 8068 Calle Carabe Place for wine broker license. c. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Johnny R. 5 Winters, 9134 Foothill Blvd for on -sale beer and wine eating place. d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Beverly J. 6 and Frank A. Lyons, 8241 Foothill Blvd for on -sale general eating place and caterers permit. City Council Agenda -2- November 18, 1981 e. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Carlos E. and 7 Carlos J. Figari, Lady N. Ortiz, and Marcelo and Cecilia M. Carlos, Town and Country Liquor, 12962 -64 Foothill Blvd. for off -sale general license. f. Forward claim against the City by Wilma E. Sparks, 7979 8 Winery Ridge Drive to the City Attorney for handling. g. Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agree- 11 ment for Ruben and Margaret Hernandez located at 8850 Center Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -177 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A PEAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREE- MENT FROM RUBEN AND MARGARET HERNANDEZ. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -178 13 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RUBEN AND MARGARET HERNANDEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. h. Approval of Budget Adjustments and Transfers. _ 18 Recommendation: It is recommended that the revenue received from the sale of printed documents such as the Industrial Specific Plan be appropriated into the Community Development Printing and Publications Account. Also, transfer into the Community Development Printing account the following: $2,000 from Travel and Mileage of Community Development Administration Account and $3,000 from the Salary Account of Planning. i. Release of Bonds: 19 -Tract 9436 - located south of Victoria and east of Haven Avenue. Owner: Crismar Development Corp. Monument Bond $2,550 -Tract 9582 -2 - located north of Wilson and east of • Haven Avenue. Owner: Deer Creek Company. Monument Bond $5,720. City Council Agenda -3- November 18, 1981 j. Set Public Hearing Date of December 2, 1991 for Planned Development 81 -01 - tentative tract 11853 - American National. A change of zone from R -1 -8500 to R- 3 /P.D. for a total planned development of 72 condominium units on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202- 171 -42. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. ENVIRONMENTA -06 20 to R- 3 /P.D. (multiple family /planned development) for the development of a planned residential subdivision consisting of 62 townhouse units on 5.4 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Route - APN 208 - 211 -25 and 26. (Related item; Tentative Tract No. 11144). Staff report by Jack Lam. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Planned Development Zone Designation No. 81 -06 for the T b M project through the adoption of Ordinance No. 160 and to approve the issuance of a Negative Declaration. • ORDINANCE NO. 160 (second reading) 21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208 - 211 -25 8 26 ON THE HEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE FROM A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D. B. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL 38 ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED VELOPMENT NO -0 T 8 ROBERTS GROUP. A proposed planned unit. development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -23, 25, 6 26. Recommendation: Based upon the consistency of this develop- ment with the adopted City General Plan and other ordinances, goals, and policies, it is recommended that the Planning Commission decision be upheld and that the City Council set this matter for public hearing for the adoption of the Zone Change at its meeting of December 16, 1981. C. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION OECISiON ON ENVIRONMENTAL 61 ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N0. NY - 8 TT 1 928 SHAFFER /WESTLAND VENTURE. A propose panned eveTopment of townhouse units on 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 252 -32. City Council Agenda -4- November 18, 1981 • Recommendation: The Planning Commission has found that the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and the goals, policies, and ordinances of the City. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission decision and set December 16, 1981 as the first public hearing to consider approval of the Zone Change. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -05 93 TT 9369 and 11 3 - BROCK. A change of zone from R -3 to R- 3 /P.D. for a total planned development of 119 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 181 -23 & 24. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planned Development Zone Designation No. 81 -05 through the adoption of Ordinance No. 161. ORDINANCE NO. 161 (first reading) 131 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 181 -23 AND 24, • LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.D. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -10 132 TT 34 - DLV. A change of zone from A-1 to R- 3 /P.D. for a total planned development of 98 townhomes on 8.5+ acres of land located at the northwest corner of Vineyard and Arrow Highway - APN 207 - 211 -28. Recommendation: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approve Planned Development Zone Designation No. 80 -10 for the above described project through adoption of Ordinance No. 162. ORDINANCE NO. 162 (first reading) 160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207- 211 -28 ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE FROM A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 - LAWLOR. 161 A request for a change of zone from R-1-14 acres to R-1-20,000 square feet for the development of Tentative Tract No. 10210 - APN 1061 - 172 -03. First reading of Ordinance No. 159 was continued from the November 4, 1981 city council meeting. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of Ordinance No. 159 approving Zone Change No. 81 -01 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. r1 lJ • City Council Agenda -5- November 18, 1981 ORDINANCE NO. 159 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1061 - 172 -03 LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE AND ALMOND, FROM R -1 -14 ACRES TO R -1- 20,000 SQUARE FEET. G. ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I FOR TRACT 9584 AND TRACT 9584 -2. Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the annexation of Tracts 9584 and 9584 -2 to Landscape District No. 1 and approve Resolution No. 81 -179. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR TRACT NO. 9584 AND TRACT NO. 9584 -2. 5, CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. PRESENTATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN. Staff report by Jim Robinson. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino have jointly purchased a 25.5 acre site at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue for the purpose of developing a civic center /county court complex. Development of a Master Plan for the entire site has been under study by the City and County, and two alternatives have been prepared for City Council review. A presenta- tion of the proposed alternatives for the Master Plan will be made by Hellmuth, Obata, and Kassabaum Architects, Inc., and H.M.C. Architects, Inc. B. PRESENTATION OF CHANGE IN ELECTION LAWS TO PERMIT CONSOLI DRTION OF MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. toff report by Lauren Wasserman. C. STATUS REPORT ON THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. Staff report by Jack Lam. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7, ADJOURNMENT. The meeting to adjourn to a Redevelopment Agency ee ng mmediately following the Council meeting. 162 179 180 188 190 194 in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, November 18, 1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Present were Councilmen: James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palumbo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the minutes of October 7 and October 21, 1981. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Thursday, November 19, will be a presentation of the Terra Vista Project. Lion's Park Community Center, 7:00 p.m. b. Ground Access Steering Committee, 9:00 a.m. on Friday, November 20 in Ontario. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -11 -18 in the amount of $441,638.46. b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for F. Gail Squires, 8068 Calla Carabe Place for wine broker license. c. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Johnny R. Winters, 9134 Foothill Boulevard for on -sale beer and wine eating place. d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Beverly J. and Frank A. Lyons, 8241 Foothill Boulevard for on -sale general eating place and caterers permit. e. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for Carlos E. and Carlos J. Figari, Lady N. Ortiz, and Marcelo and Cecilia M. Carlos, Town and Country Liquor, 12962 -64 Foothill Boulevard for off -sale general license. f. Forward claim againstthe City by Wilma E. Sparks, 7979 Winery Ridge Drive to the City Attorney for handling. g. Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agreement for Ruben and Margaret Hernandez located at 8850 Center Avenue, RESOLUTION NO. 81 -177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RUBEN AND MARGARET HERNANDEZ. h. Approval of Budget Adjustments and Transfers. Recommendation: It is recommended that the revenue received from the sale of printed documents such as the Industrial Specific Plan be appropriated into the Community Development Printing and Publications Account. Also, transfer into the Community Development Printing account the following: $2,000 from Travel and Mileage of Community Development Administration Account and $3,000 from the Salary Account of Planning. I. Release of Bonds: -Tract 9436 - located south of Victoria and east of Haven Avenue. Owner: Crismar Development Corp. Monument Bond $ 2,550 -Tract 9582 -2 - located north of Wilson and east of Haven Avenue. Owner: Deer Creek Company. Monument Bond $ 5,720 J. Set Public Hearing Date of December 2, 1981 for Planned Development 81 -01 - tentative tract 11853 - American National. A change of zone from R -1 -8500 to R- 3 /P.D. for a total planned development of 72 condominium units on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202 -171- 42. Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. Council changed the order of the agenda -- items 4B and 4C were considered together as the first item under public hearings. 4B. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -07 (TT 11869) - ROBERTS GROUP. A proposed planned unit development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 201- 252 -23, 25, 6 26. ment of 67 townhouse units or 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of HighlandVM Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 252 -32. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Both projects had been approved by the Planning Commission and received tentative approval of the tract with a recommendation to Council for a change of zone. Subsequent to the Planning Commission's decision, a group of home owners appealed that decision to the Council. Points raised by the appellants were: I. Density and size of the proposed units are not compatible with the homes in the immediate area. Roberts project is a planned development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres which breaks down to 13.9 dwelling units per acre. Shaffer /Westland Venture project is a planned development of 67 townhouse units on 5.85 acres which breaks dawn to 11.4 dwelling units per acre. plated as part of the projects themselves, such as improving and widening the roads which they afront. 3. Internal circulations. Both projects have been reviewed and do meet all the internal circulation requirements in terms of driveway widths and access. The Roberts project has two access points -- one on Archibald and one on Highland which is the main Point of access. The Shaffer /Westland project will have one major access point with a secondary emergency access. 4. Quality and style of the developments. The Design Review Committee has reviewed these projects and has felt comfortable with the compatiblity of design to the single family homes. 5. Highland Avenue. The appellants felt that Highland Avenue in its present condition would be incapable of handling the increased traffic. As stated previously, full street improvements would be done along with the Projects. 6. Schools. Since incorporation, the city has been working closely with the schools to prevent overcrowding conditions. A growth management Plan went into effect, and fees were charged with all new development to help mitigate future overcrowding. Staff's recommendation: To uphold the Planning Commission's decision and set December 16, 1981 for public hearing on the proposed zone change. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: 1. Sheryl Moody, 6355 Jadeite, member of the homeowner's association. She expressed that the homeowner's association desired to see community standards maintained. As they see it, the proposed developments changes what already exists. 2. Lee Mareacci, 6368 Jadeite. She addressed the issues of increased density, increased traffic, the waiver of the EIR, increased crime, increased burden on fire services, and the physical appearance of the units. She expressed concern that the Roberts project had open carports, the Shaffer /Westland project only had eighteen proposed vistor parking spaces, and the exterior features need to be made compatible with the surrounding areas. 3. Myriel Forst, 6235 Dartmouth. She expressed concern that the higher density would contribute to overcrowding of schools. 4. Philip Marcaccf, 6368 Jadeite, a member of the homeowners association. He expressed concern about the impact of the multi - family unit developments. As far as the freeway development, he felt this would not be completed during his life time. He recommended strongly that council not approve the zone change. 5. Fred Nelson, resident of Diamond Bar and property owner in the area. He expressed concern about the intersection of Archibald and Highland. He said it was extremely dangerous. He asked council not to approve any development in the area until the intersection is improved. 6. Carl Heinz, 6471 Jadeite. He expressed concern that no Environmental Impact Report had been prepared. Since one of the features of the projects was flowing water, he wondered if there would be sufficient water pressure and if there would be standing water which would breed mosquitos. He felt this should be evaluated before approval is given to the projects. 7. Lee Marcacci. She said they had been informed that a child had been killed recently on a bicycle. The area is zoned for 35 mph although most people go through at a much higher speed. They had heard that the city was thinking about increasing the speed limit. 8. Frank Stone, 9373 Cocoa. He expressed concerning about maintaining the quality of education. streets had been planned for a long time. They were designed according to eventual build out of the city. 11. Sheryl Moody stated that what she heard was the condominiums were approved based on the fact that the freeway would be going in and that Archibald was a main thoroughfare and divided highway. She inquired as to where was Archibald divided. Mr. Lam explained that in the planning of the city the higher densities were planned along main thoroughfares and highwa. S. As far as Archibald designated as a divided highway, it does not mean that it is divided at the present time. The city planned to have such main arterials divided for two reasons: one, that it provides better traffic flow, and two for its aesthetic considerations in Planning landscaping in the streets. Ms. Moody said that they were concerned because Archibald could not handle the traffic there now. They felt they should not create further hazardous conditions until the existing problems were taken care of. 12. Mr. Nelson. Stated that he has been trying to get in touch with Caltrans for some time. He said that he did get the information that the money to purchase the land to complete the freeway is in the bank although Governor Brown will not let Caltrans purchase the land. He felt the cities should get together and request the money be release to purchase the land. The completion of the freeway would solve all the problems. 11. Toni Ryan, 6067 Burgandy. Asked why this area was chosen for high density. Secondly, she asked how Archibald could be designated as a high arterial since there were two schools along Archibald. Thirdly, she felt that the number of children from high density units would increase in the future since these are such inflationary times. Lastly, what would be the completion dates of the units -- would the roads and schools be ready by the completion time of the units. 14. Mr. Nelson said at the last meeting he had offered to give them the land on Highland. He said if the other owner, Mr. Schultz, would also give them the land on the other side, they would have it made. 15. Mr. Shaub asked why we have to spend tax dollars improving Archibald when there is another major road to the east which is straight, wide, and divided. Mr. Lam responded that whether any development occurred at this location or not, there was still a problem at this intersection which needed improvement. If the project disappeared, and the right -of -way was not there, then there would still be the need to widen this intersection. Tax payers dollars are used only when land is not donated or improvements are not made by develop- ment. 16. Jeff Callaway, 9716 Cocoa. He stated that the present zoning was R -1- 10,000. Since this was originally zoned for single family, he felt this could be maintained for the reason of "quality of life." He also stated that if we cannot handle the police, fire, water problems, and school problems, then why consider increasing the density. Lastly, he asked why the EIR was waived. Mr. Vairin explained that the R -1- 10,000 zoning existed before incorporation under the County. When the city prepared the general plan, it was felt that this area should be a 4 -14 units per acre designation. He stated that the Planning Commission and staff did prepare an environmental assessment evaluation and conditions were placed on the project. 17. Kathryn Burr, 6210 Phillips Way. Addressed the issue of horses and traffic. 18. Colleen Wang, 9641 Hidden Farms Road. Stated there had been a fire recently and it took the fire department 10 minutes to respond. Mayor Schlosser asked what is being done about the water pressure in this area. Mike Vairin said they had received correspondence from the water district through the standard review process which indicated that the develop- ,ill . g . ' -t _ city I _ _ .al e sources of the community at the current level. He felt the city should retrench and instead of expanding, they should perhaps place a moratorium on building and allow the past to catch up. 22. Sam Angona, representing the Shaffer /Westland Venture project. He stated that the only way the city is going to take care of problems is through the building permits -- that the city has to grow. Councilman Mikels responded to questions regarding the school fees, where they originated and how they are spent. Michael Vairin responded to the questions regarding fire and police services. Councilman Mikels and Mr. Hubbs responded the questions regarding storm drain fees and how they were established and used. Mavor Schlosser expressed that he felt a meeting with the residents was in order. 23. Nancv Jones asked if there was a specific time limit to approve this oroject. 24. Mrs. Conger commented that one could look out their windows into the back yards of homes along Archibald. 25. Mr. Shaub asked if it were possible that the density could be lowered. There being no further public input, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to continue item to the December 2, 1981 meeting. Toni Quesada concurred that this would be okav to the developer. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 9:07 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:35 p.r... with all members of the council and staff present. 4A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -06 - T 6 M BUILDER A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R- 3 /P.D. (multiple family /pl development) for the development of a planned residential subdivision consistin of 62 townhouse units on 5.4 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Route - APN 208- 211 -25 and 26. (Related item: Tentative Tract No. 11144). Staff report by Jack Lam. Beverly Authelet, deputy city clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 160. ORDINANCE N0. 160 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208 - 211 -25 6 26 ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE FROM A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 160. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. NO. 80 -10 (TT 11734) - A change of zone from A -1 to R- 3 /P.D. for a total planned development of VM townhomes on 8.5+ acres of land located at the northwest corner of Vineyard and Arrow Highway - APN 207- 211 -28. Jack Lam presented the staff report. Beverly Authelet, deputy city clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 162. ORDINANCE NO. 162 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207- 211 -28 ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE FROM A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D. Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading of Ordianance No. 162. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Frost asked about the linearity along the north strip. Mr. Lam responded stating that this was the result of discussion through the Design Review. Mayor Schlosser set December 2, 1981 for second reading of Ordinance No. 162. BROCK. A change at zone tram R -3 to R- 3 1F.D. for a total planned development or 119 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202- 181 -23 and 24. Staff report presented by Michael Vairin, Senior Planner. Beverly Authelet, deputy city clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 161. ORDINANCE NO. 161 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 181 -23 AND 24, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.D. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 161. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. There being no further discussion by the Council, Mayor Schlosser set December 2, 1981 for second reading. Beverly Authelet, deputy city clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 159. ORDINANCE NO. 159 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1061 - 172 -03 LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE AND ALMOND, FROM R -1 -14 ACRES TO R -1- 20,000 SQUARE FEET. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 159. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing council was: Leon Kedding, representing Gregory Lawlor. He had a slope map on which he pointed out where the development would be -- the slope was less than 30 in that area. Areas over 30% slope were in the open space areas. He stated that they would not be in opposition to having the area designa- ted R -1- 30,000. He said the area within the zone change, the four lots would be 35,000 to 50,000 square feet anyway. There being no further public response, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing Council discussion: Councilman Frost stated that there wasn't any question insofar as R -1- 20,000 being inappropriate. To a certain degree he would have to disagree with the recommendation from the Planning Commission. He felt the project was not one specifically designed to fit that particular area. Councilman Mikels stated that the general plan designation for all property north of Almond is hillside residential. He stated that the applicant's offer to change the zoning to better conform with the site that is being proposed is somewhat con- sistent to the zone designation of hillside residential. We don't have a R -1- 30,000 zone, but what we do have is the hillside residential designation. Although this does not specify a particular lot size, but it does specify a minimum size. Mr. Lam pointed out that the hillside designation is a land use category of the general plan. It is not a zoning district. If there is a desire to have another zoning district created, then we can do that. After some further discussion, the Mayor asked the city attorney how to handle this situation. Mr, Dougherty stated that the item was before council as an approved tentative man with the condition that the one east portion of the property be rezoned from R- 1- 14,000 to R -1- 20,000. Council does not have a zone change application before them affecting the westerly portion of the property which is presently zoned R- 1- 20,000. Council's options are: (1) to approve the R -1- 20,000 zone change request which would automi- tically approve the tract map, or (2) reject the application for the zone change on the portion shown as R- 1- 14,000. This would automatically make the map fail. By rejecting the request, council could refer the matter back to the Planning Commission with the direction that the Planning Commission study a different zone classification and report to the city council. The Planning Commission could accept the direction of the city council and initiate zone change application nrocedures for the entire property, and come back to council with another zone change request. This might also involve a redesign of the tentative map. If the Planning Commission did not act on the recommendation of the council for a study and report, there is the ability under the Government Code for the council to order that study and have that report made. .. Lam at, . the hillside .ty _ .1 exceed two units per acre which would be 20,000 square feet. However, the actual number of units are to be defined through the environmental studies. Mr. Lam stated that if council wished more stringent hillside designations which the Planning Commission has not discussed, then they should direct staff to proceed with this. Mr. Kedding stated that if the Council chose to zone the fourteen acres as R- 1- 10,000 and to refer this back to the Planning Commission for a hearing to determine the balance of the tract also as a 30,000 square foot size, they would have no objections to that. The City Attorney said it would be more appropriate to refer back the entire area to the Commission rather than taking only a portion. Mr. gadding concurred to whatever the Council chose to do. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to refer this back to the Planning Commission for consideration of a new zone classification to be derived from the hillside land use designation of the General Plan. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1. Mr. Lam suggested that this come back to Council the first week in January in order to allow the Planning Commission time to study this. Councilman Bridge returned to his council seat. 4G. ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, I FOR TRACT 9584 AND TRACT 9584 -2. Mr. Hubbs presented the staff report. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to approve the annexation of tracts 9584 and 9584 -2 into the landscape maintenance district, to approve Resolution No. 81 -179, and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -179. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 7 TO LAND- SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR TRACT NO. 9584 AND TRACT NO. 9584 -2. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS 5A. PRESENTATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN. Staff report by Jim Robinson. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino have jointly purchased a 25.5 acre site at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue for the purpose of developing a civic center /county court complex. Development of a master plan for the entire site has been under study by the City and County, and two alternatives have been preoared for City Council review. A presentation of the proposed alternatives for the master plan was made by Bill Valentine, of Hellmuth, Obata, and Kassabaum Architects, Inc. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public cement. There being none, the pu` 'ic portion was closed. Alternative B. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 10:50. The meeting reconvened at 11:05 p.m. with all members of the council and staff present. 5B. PRESENTATION OF CHANGE IN ELECTION LAWS TO PERMIT CONSOLIDATION OF MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. Staff report by LaLren Wasserman. It is now possible for cities to schedule their municipal elections on the same day as the statewide primary election (June of even numbered years), the day of the statewide general election (November of even numbered years), or on the same day as school and special district elections (November of odd numbered years). Mr. Wasserman outlined some of the advantages and disadvanges to Rancho Cucamonga if the city should decide to consolidate. Councilman Frost said that he felt the item should be referred to the Advisory Commission in December for consideration. He stated that he would favor November of odd numbered years if we should decide to consolidate. Councilman Mikels stated he did not favor even numbered years. The law is on the books so the council could take action at some time in the future. He felt that the next municipal election should be left as is. He did not feel that this should be referred to the Advisory Commission. He felt there was some merit in considering consolidation with the special district elections. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to leave the municipal election set for April In odd numbered years. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5C. STATUS REPORT ON THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT. Staff report by Jack Lam. Mr. Lam stated that the reason this report was included in the City Manager's Staff Reports was in order to highlight the community development program. He said that Richard Marks, of the city staff, was the lead person working on the program, and he would be happy to answer any questions at any time. Councilman Mikels requested to be kept informed during the process of the application. Council received and filed the report. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palomho, seconded by Frost to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk R46T C1 TT ANCITI 61ICAMON6A DATE WARRANT RECOWIL � DISCOUNT _ � ELONf.IL1�N 11 / /! /41 .. - WRAP. R VFM M V F N 0 0 N M A M E 4MR FERF E NET 2 1 10 `55.00 1.142. SA 710.400 4 17A.90 75.00 7,14315 a .0 51.04 A6.30 20.3n 63.13 603.90 13,952.95 900.99 52.74 9.543.50 24,07].95 95.50 � I I CITY R44CIW CUCKNONGA MARR • V E N O O R N A N F N4NRANT Y.MMIL ON II /1'J /5I 11i7i R E DISCOUNT I NET RA� I I r y 1 y J y 1 1 1 I � i i la I ! i I i i s I J �J N667 CITY 0 oux: CUC410.16A IT i YA1 V F. N D 0 R [NIU1``A Y F 9111, 11T Al ?} Sf I: p��q LNV 1LIt OF.C;NTR 0 319 J439 S'i^l[ ++ JJ'ly L CO 01320 Will vF+;9U8 M'. 8190 09371 4190 S91.11d7CN CAI IF FDISI:N 001 ? 8395 S•9TN' +7 CALIF f.AS Cn 1.11:0 n: p4 Ni to ^9 9r, g525 09324 41,75 STI11FI'5 ^S Fl9^ 14115 3155 T1^.11AI R IT115 IVC OR126 V•11:3 V7 I:J. 471'1 011.7 R719 71TLf INS f. TRUST CI1 0x171 1774 T:IVxF1♦ TIRO 19329 9060 try F..`q. CF ;IRGF. 0A 110 91oS NA ^U. FLLIVI TFI 0 11AY 1911 9?,J WFST FN1 U 99 312 7 ': ST11- !':'CY C^ 9,314 ^945 v11Kf 11 Si pS.11 Alrp .1 I virF 01616 99'19 7F -1 IG11 Srnvlcf 13 116 13.11 - F I "AL TIT ALS 1526.1 9111 5 C S x 1 A (q YAP.^ IAT, i1 //11I/ H^1 11+'/11 11/11/11 ll /1`/91 Il /IV 11 11 /IIU'q 11 /Ir /91 Il /1 � /r1 I1 /1! /n1 1ln a /gI 11 /I:V aI 11, /l ^ /dl 11 /14 /AI I1 /15/ ^1 11/14/.41 11/04/%11 WARRANT NFCOIYIII N 11 /111 /6l N91'OWLv DISCOUNT RFFF:RF'ICE FINAL TOTALS J J I J ! J I —I ' 1 GAGE 3 NFT . 193.0 691.00 2.683.64 92.71 j L 1IF. I 3.400.91 I, 60.00 11x."1 11).1] 862.94 9.51 61.09 50.95 92.IO- 551.618.46 ' J J I J ! J I —I _ Ae r.ix AM..FI. r; Fee —.- w APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICERSRSI rn: C"We'm.( Mcoholm A o9n CmM1d 12150 SOe1 Sanamnm4 Coll. 931r1 $dD�praCn.elnn TA. eeei eed F ... be, ap'. her r «.., d.Nnwd as renew,: 1. FY9E(S) Of LICENSES) FILE NO. f- .. - , _'::.. '' WINE BBOKnR Applied uede.$en 24AI ❑ Eff S-Imm 19d15an0e RECEIPT NO. O Ark CODE R) 1Jl eon lowed 1. NAME(5) Of AfM1ICANT(5) temp. r «mil ER«n.e OFF.. SQUIRES, F. Call 3. TYPEES) Of TRANSACTIONS) FEE IIC. TYPE " New .' S 61.60 16 A Nem_er dwnol I I- Ii., of Rune. a -Numb« and Sn..l 8655 Calle Carabe Pl. crllia &o f`aam..ga 91730 %WSI-o- TFO d 61.50 1. M. Premivl Inai $Fe+IlPlof li(enM Cily limiN? 85• 4 AI AdC dleu pl Me—, f— 3)- Number oReal Sneel Role I.. evr bon tpnutned el IF (eloml? 10. HeneI.. a ee ei Hal any d Me po.i6an el Me AlmM1de Conud Aa w rqulIvtiom of the Oeporrmenl pv- • bi...1 m Me All? Ay0 IL E.pEFm a'YES' lmnv to ibma 9 or 10.. on .1GINmen1 wM1ieh Fh.TI be deemed poG of Ihit eppIH.seFF. U. Appfmm ogre- (o) Tm ofI m eager employed in amanle liaemed p mner oal Fom ell he quell"91m nl o A0. qnd (6) 1Ao1 Fe will n inlal r pn n be wolored uny of IM1e pro of the AlroM1elia G.ern9e Cnnnel Atl al ry e er enum a mill .room -° 11. STATE Of CALIFORNIA CC—, e San Ber.-IardinOF'. 11.2 1 IF ( ... .. . _. .. _ Ov... ........ _...._.. .._ m h rM. 1 r h r: n rrv.rn.r •n w n.r.N rv.n4: n ..x IF r. 1 IF x: r+ �rvnr. rw rvw.�n . - +.r.n .. aw �.. .r .n .n•�.µ� rn..x�n err. o�..rM..r ra +. r : err rw w+aw .rM ... w r • + ..... r . rrwwr �w w en n+wrw w :..r.+ r .hm• rrvM: h.x 4. n m. o..wrv.wr M1rnr ry m IF w_ru.r! rw..r.M1 IC APP11CANr SIGN HERE 1 .!), Si�i': ['.] ... . .. .. ....... .. ....._......_ ..- ..............__.:....._.�._ .. ka APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR s S. STAIC Of CALIFORNIA Caunry of .. .. ..- WII .. . .... ....._. ..... e...xr aN . ..r • Do N01 IVrire Rerelp TM1iF Lie, For OrrMereml U., Ord, ArNtbed, [) Retnrdnd r.o6u. -�� �� ❑ .......... .._.. ._..;.,... ....... _- COrIfS MAllEO ...._..__._.....__.. .. .. ' .laid of .:. .......- ,:.:..:,.. .,., ..__. -.. �• •• 1ir+F. -: T!"'."✓•°`^ ¢4O�_.J.�F!PIL:JSfx•.rt+m +._:a. ..... _... COPY. IN. H__Em R.... n... APPLICATION FOR ALCONONC LEVERAGE LICENSIISI 1. VIES) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. FEE NO. Fail Oepwlmmr of AkoMlk b.rrapr Cmlrol I2I30 Srr.er SM Bv>y[din0 lorremenrq CoK1. 93[11 oC SALS ERE& i IRYS INI36 ,......o.0 ............: PAI'IBO PL1C5 CODE CODE 3615 The mder•Ig.r Srr.b9 olph.. Iw Cole 4mm d —ib.d e. Idlo.r: bFOrd Temp. Pmmn 2 NAME(S) OF APnICANT(S) ` Apy1;.d v I be 9AO 44 ❑ femlb. Don: 1 1/81 Ebr�.Jd� ( LIC. _. J. TYPES) OF TRANSAC RARCNO MZRT.AS Joh:l+l R. - R TYPE ss EI�6T� RL yB�JO '7 el 47? 6 aN - ...... - ., 1OR 1 J1 '. A. Nom. of gimme.' '. J.M. •e cowtN Break:OSt G G11n.�.Ria Avoly Lae Zms Rae.R39575 .l. t.FN of Lpdom —N.mbm yM So.. i r >r o1vL service Eee 550.00. a 9134 rooth BWd. 0, Mof np code 0[agaDa912)C0 ' RancM 0 39503 RECEIPT NO. 3yy]f LOTAL f a8a. gp '. d. If Pr rl.e U—No , I. Are pr<mlpF m.ae Yea So.. type or Lim— M City Li'Tow . t Malin9 Addreu 61 differ—I Iron S)— Nombor oM Slm PfiREi ,,.d of a TO ... I 1i, No Yoo ne rlofZt; rp W he p•o^rlam of IM1e Alk M1 CFmj?oj lf� OFry • f rw All? MI w egy Nam .(,k. O.parlmem• 1 L E[plo;. a ITS. ano-er 1. Rl F 9 or 10 on en FFFhm 1 rK,h rh.11 be domed pen el ,Mr app /LII ^19. App l;[e I •Fla rFal noper mp1,d I. 1. I;.• .•d pram �;II M1a. nll lb. wl;fi[e m. el a II[ . end Ib) rbolpbe .•II ro lalvr er p. a b.;alnred a el rM1r pe. F el 11: Al[pM1Oliee O..a a Con rel All I• • er reFF. .... nl .uen . ray 1 u. STATE of CALIFORNIA cmol9' of San BASTUardIOD ..., ........_.... Ixl. .._illl /91 .... ........ .... wl..r ..N N..... ..m .. I- Iwl.h w hr...•. .n•.. r ywrAmr 11. APPLICANT / �i El ON HERE 1C..';..'... '...!1 .:........:.. � ...z' ... ec........ ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .... .... _... .... ....,. APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR IS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Co.., or .. ... ... Do'. .. .., De,Ym Will, Rrlam iii• Liyr; I'or OrlM.lrnrnt 1'Fe OnM1J AII.I C Recorded noon, - ❑ Ndmm, popmr. �I ❑._...__._._..___....... ......� /......._...._.._,.COPIES MAILED .....:Ai .,.,. _�._............_ S Ren..yl lu e15183.Pda`;del San Be[na TdlnO pM�een 10/70/81 .. Pettipl Ne Seo }7 a7n Va_ • • 7 y.. COPY.. - -------- - - - - -- arc APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC gNERAGE LICENSE(S), 1. TYPE(S) OF IICENSE(S) FILE NO. Ee: W,,h^"rl 0 Ak "hel. krero9. Cm,rd RECEIPT NO, 121505'.., San Bermrdino OR SALE GEIIEUL 39576 GEOGRAPHICAL CODE 3607 S°u°m<WCWIl.9ssll r"•ur.r...n. &WING Fine$ Ts..nd<,lynw h.rebF.pphn le. AND CATERERS PEFRIT Dom Ik....r e.rcrr6d e. Ielb..: Applied aAe< Sec. 2L014 ❑ Iun 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) T.mp, h,mn ' LYO::5,Elmrly S. & Frank A. Eaeeli.e Dmo ISSUO11CC . ]. TYPEN OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE IIC. TYPE Pre.. Tsi. k 6100.00 47 .. .. .,, Fran. Cctere"' s ?erit I 2 2 -ti-E. - _�Ifl�p A. Lyons Caters' z S. L..c., 01 a °,.nnr- N.mbe..nd Elm., Ecn t100.00 821.1 Foothill Blvd. °nd aP Cnd. C-, Pancpo Cuc=cinma 91739 San Ddno TO 6. sm.irP�er`i�.�,< 41 080245 Lissuance oiAPrenI.FTSf. 47 cini+r`nn,i l "Yes e. #d4 l At d;rt <,< rem fl -NY ^h.NOM Sr• con . —_ m.., veer., .. ... enn --lm- °I ° N'1 I? 10. Hev yeu a .ie1nM °ey eE IM pee:" el A. AI<ehali. ��,A/ k.erege c-".1 A. .1 1,0.m I A rO.p°nm.n, par. 11. Erplein ° WES" [cone, r0 iromr 90, 10 en en 0n.<hmenr nhi0h.be11 k domed p N 0l Ilrir eppli.e6°n. 12 All .... r egmn (e) ihat 0"y m nape, empl9yed Ie 0n ?' Imemed gems,..i0 have .11 IL< gwlifwriml <E a liar...., and .' (h) IT.' hr will nnl r;eler< 6r avid[ 01 prrmil 1. Im .:ol°led "ny./ A. pre.reans al IP. AI,Ohalil Lr.e,°9e C01I101 Ali. 12. STATE OF CALIFORNIA C—, l e San Bern: rClnn Delr 1 - ju•.,1 e••,Y rl nri � ._.. r .sn SIGN HERE APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR S. STATE OF CALIFORNIA C..n Y I San DernsrdinO 10 -30-31 xw "`....r: 16 N,f" °I Li<envehl, •• • • ' i..n..... nr u.n 17 Sie relil nl Cme Pe(d LYONS, 8cvcrly J. ✓1�. /tr' " %.. t .r'. 47/53 -7074' (III) 91764 "'F° °P Cw. Son BESrn.RTdSno Da Nel Wdle Brlme Thil Gin,; F "r ngmrtm.m I'm 0nl9 - -- An.rhed: ❑Recorded loom. -• ❑ ..'•••. 738.00 "••:••.. �.. .. COPIES MAAEO ...AO, j0 -HI __ 0 Pen1"e4 F«.1 �dm"_.San Bens ^ ^ -TdSno oa<. od'.',30 /30/31 pens 39576 ,.r. p COPY.. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC MIRAGE NCENSEISI Tv: Depolmrmr of Al.hell, lit—, Control 11150SInel Sevamenrv, C.W. 9581A —6tP.-EVECRAXdS unn,u.u... ,.....aa Th• mM.m, -d b.,eby.pyl:oo For limn dea,rbed a, 1.6 -u I. TYPE(S) OF LICENSEISI FILE NO. OFF SALE GENERAL Applied mde, Sm b04 Eenfre D.M: j....... RECEIPT NO. 5 j Z[ GEOGRAPMCAL CODE !,615 Den bused ]. NAME(S) OF APPLICANTS) ie.P If—, . Eff," D., 12GARI, CYrloe E. 7IGdnI. Carlon J. & Ziwyl La d? N. J. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE LAC. TYPE OHM, Carlo. Marcelo 6 Cecilia M Fer.4ef. s1274.(10 21 A. Neme of e—ee d'oRN G Count" Liquor n C^ 20 IL IF Imp EXO CUCPMOX POARINISIR�1 S. L-1— ar emmn.- N.mbe, eea sa.e 0962 -64 Foothill Blvd. N lit Z�9LrlllEply1. <Ily end xlp <oe< wanly Reneho Cucamonga 9Tn rxd ` o TOTAL s 1Tj4.00 A, sbo. I,d,.1 t;,, .w 21 -69985 cry u mm uu. Tea a. Mmlin9 Add,n, IA drenem Lem 5)- Number end AIM m—, , I, —, 9. Nv.. ... .... been,end,ted vl v lebny? 10. Non Toe —I .mlwodl any IF Th. prmluwe of th. Alcoholic o Fmro9e Comlel Aa w rpel of lb• Deponm.n s /r tummy to IAe A,,? Nt 1 1, Rplmn v "YES" emwer 1. inm19 nr 10 an on onadmem nbrth IAall ba cl-.M po,, of Ih, eppl —I., It Applkom ...... (or 15m ony monger employed rn ale Lcemed p—i— sill Aave all tAe g-lfinevnl of a Il....... and Ibl IA,, he nrll .ol .IOlme a .r permit lv be .,Ilol,d ony vl the pro.i.iom IT IAe AI,ol*I, Re.erage Covoel Af, 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Co—, al Son Bernardi.o Do'. 11/9/81 M..m 1A APPLICANT r ,~•• ~ x...r.... fi ,r,., rr. r..ra .rrr.mr.+ M.Z. WEr_KMnw. w.nnr . n. y..w _.n .. nr.r.,n rr.. .. SIGN HERE .� F J. Z fR1.G /e�( -wet el I e _a.�' p� `•.�... .. ,.. .. . /APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR S. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Co." al Can Bernardino Do, 11/9/89 :o L.. Ib Nem bl d p,n ee(am•.a.' n.n.v.. n+.. o...."w• n(10l p.r�eeh �w •m•w•rw ter• �� IA Ile w Numherlal Corinne lAN, 'O 21- 69935_- _ Steve Lucero, Sr. .o.orr.n62 -64 Yooth.11S181vd., Rencho Cuc �o i,p. 1.01) 91740 San HMT.4r lino V.NMN'ILI, Odnrr Thi, Lin,. PpI n,,Mentvnf PV Onlq - - -_ - - -- — Alfpb.dr Ij R.,e,ded nm,.., 0 1 du.io, pepell. ] O _ ............. .......COPIES MAILED ❑ Rme -al A.. of Rold 111 r.,.r., 7 OS,. on R."LM No CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY ORIGINAL FOR FILE •INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death. injuq to person or to personal vvroperly most be filed not later than 100 days alter the occurrence. (Gov. CcAe Sec. 911,2) 2. Claims for damages to real properly must be filed not later than I year after the ,mantises. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Read entire Claim before filing. 1. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locale place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom.. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. 71 Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915s) TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM No.. -------- ............ _. re ctrY o e14MC140GICWO ADMfNISTRAT(ON AM NO 21981 T�3181b111112111 21 3 0 1 51 6 (H natural person) 7'J91 Eu .s 6....ras .. ...G.r..a:.. City = dSt?te I Poeirseas Tolorhoeo Number Give address to which yca desire notices or communications to be sent Saute 3s :l`.]9V2 Now did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars. I was ridir.; i,ioycle east on Dan 3ernar:ino Road maldn; a right turn onto Oran er:ood 1ri in tae 'ity of 'ancho Caca-ronLa. 'Then ny tires hit a Stlall strei,a or .:at.: ^, :?y bil,o fle.v out Croat unjer ne and T :Gas thrown to the -rour)d. '7n clo.ar In :'.,ctlon, it was ii. covered that the Tatar run in th•lt ;otter `onstantly ani a :, L'c::, 'alac4r, 51iny 31!:ae -1:4e suhstance has corned. hen did DAMAGE-or-INJURY occur? Give fall particulars, date, time of day Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give street names and address and measurements from landmarks: At of .��n 'Iernanlino -l93.1 inj �r•tn ;,aaor; 7ri'ae, !� t�)a . ^,ity What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or damage. if known: What DAMAOF or ISJUIlIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages elainted: i.1.� 1,_ ... ...:, , . , :. .... 9:1 i . What AMOUNT Jn you dmm on account of each Item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, giving basis of computation: �ive ESTIMATI'M U.10UNT as far as known you Bairn on account of each Item of prompectve injury or damage, giving basis of ,An.::Io Ill SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) n THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE n Insurance payments rcu•ived, if any, and names of Insurance Company: t dtl.',no.ln Amount) Expenditures made on account of accident or injury: (Date —Item) ,Name and address of i5'i tnesses, Doctors and Hospitals: ',lit ned J.t .i: nus1 an,l, son 1n.t. d3'a,�Fa 9: Doctor: Dr. 'Iarend ^3 X. "UT, > ••s. 7. and :;r, v,11,1, i 1234 Foothill •` 91vd. 222 ~. . _ ;.;I r.�.no Rd, La Verne, Ca. 91750 ;a. READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by ':C'• and by shooing house numbers of distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it. and by "B" location of yourself or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A -1" and ]oestion of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by '•B.J" and the point of impact by "X." NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto is proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR UI HLR AI.I.ILGIV jSIDEWALK CURa CUR PARKWAY SIDEWALK I FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS bran : °•fnn I give X i9n rnnr•l inn 'oil SiGnature of Cl.nmant or person filing on his behalf giving I Typed Name: Date rclauonship to Claimant: MOTS. Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Cal, Pen. Code Sec. 71). CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLCRH ((;nv. CODE SEC. 915a). Pa-e -3- 'LAI I FO3 DA71AGES • fiat particular ACT or OAISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? • Defectively desicned roadway. Government entity created a dangerous condition of public property by negligently failing to properly warn persons of the dangerous roadway. They additionally created dangerous conditions of public property in that they neg113ently failed to properly monitor, check, maintain and provide for adequate drainage along San 3ernardino Road, Rancho CucamonZa, They also failed to properly post warnin-- si,;ns. Said Government entity additionally created a dan;;erous condition of public property in ways currently un::nowa but which will be shown according to proof. The names of the employees of the Government entity named as defendant in this claim who created and caused the dangerous conditions of public property are currently unknown. Said area of roadway constitutes a threat to the motoring and pedestrian public. Said area of roadway creates a substantial risk of serious injury to the motoring and pedestrian public while using; due care. Wilma E. Spa- KS / J J • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 18, 1981 UL_ TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agreement for Reuben and Margaret Hernandez located at 8850 Center Avenue Reuben and Margaret Hernandez have requested release of the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement accepted by City Council on May 6, 1981 per Resolution No. 81 -65 for financing purposes. A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Reuben and Margaret Hernandez to replace the original is attach- ed for City Council approval. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. Respectfully LBH: ff Attachments • RESOLUTION NO. $1-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RUBEN AND MARGARET HERNANEZ. WHEREAS, the City Council of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 81 -54 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Ruben and 4argaret Hernandez; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in official records of San Bernardino County, California, on May 12, 1981, as document No. 81- 104020; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that City Clerk shall cause this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor fC� • RESOLUTION NO. Q I - 79' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RUBEN AND MARGARET HERNANDEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Installation of Off -site Improvements established as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Ruben and Margaret Hernandez for 8850 Center Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign tame, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1981. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk L Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor 13 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 -C Base Line Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF RELEASE OF LIEN Let notice be given that the city of Rancho Cucamonga hereby releases its lien which it had caused to be recorded on the land hereinafter more fully described, said lien having been placed thereon by the recording of a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Ruben and Margaret Hernandez dated May 6, 1981 and recorded may 12, 1981 as Document No. 81- 104020 Recorded in Official Records, San Bernardino • County, State of California. The description of the land is as follows: Lots 8 and 9, Block 62r Map Book 4, Page 8 of North Cucamonga Fruit Land Company, Records of said County (APN 209 - 112 -30). CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation BY: PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On r 1951, before me, thethe undersign Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Phillip D. Schlosser, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ca lifornia, a municipal Corporation that executed the Within Instrument, known to me to be the person who executed the Within Instrument, on behalf of said municipal corporation, therein named, and acknowledged • to me that such municipal Corporation executed the same. 9FT ss my hand and official sea . ' 1 Notary Public in and for sa State 0 RECORDING R£OUESTED BY and WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9120 -C Base Line Road Post Office Box 800 Rancho Cucamonga. California 91710 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, rade and entered into this _ day of , 1981, by and between Reuben and Margaret Hernandez (hereinafter referred to a5 "Developer "), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for residential development, the City requires the construction of missing off -site street improvements, including curbs, gutters, sidewalks and pavement, adjacent to the property to be develo oped; and, WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the city; and, WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's perfor- manes, and any repayment due City, NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install Off- site street improvements, including curbs, gutters, sidewalks and pave- ment, in accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said improvements shall be installed upon and • along Center Avenue, adjacent to the Developer's property hereinafter described, J /1 v • 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed not later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said improvements shall be at no expense to the City. 3. In the event the Developer fails or refuses to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at _ any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improve- ments upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: Lots 8 and 9, Block 62, Mao Book 4, Page 8 of North Cucamonga Fruit Land Company, Records of said County (APN 209- 112 -30) S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes described above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this Agroement, then this conveyance shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated is a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administia:urs, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. FA 0 8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall mean "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortgages an real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any a= which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Developer to redeem the above- described property from the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be awarded by the Court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above Written. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF RANCHO ❑ CALIFORNIA, a municipal ipol / corporation BYi U PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER v Mayor ATTEST: LAUREN M. WASSEFMA.Y City Clerk • 0 • 0 VLL1 VL LYA1 \VL1V VV V!"11,1V1 \VA MEMORANDUM November 12, 1981 TO: CITY COUNCIL - CITY MANAGER FROM: FINANCE DIR9, SUBJECT: BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 6 TRANSFERS During the course of any budget year some things are inadvertently overlooked or are introduced during the year that were not anticipated at budget preparation time. Such is the case for some critical printing needs in the Community Development Department. It is recognized that revenues will be generated with the sale of certain documents, primarily the Industrial Specific Plan. This process will also generate costs as well, and must be recognized in the budget. G \F ^MQ �� 4 Q -p 1977 Therefore, it is recommended that the estimated revenue to be realized from the sale of additional printed documents of $6,600± be appropriated into the Community Development Printing and Publications Account. Also, that $2,000 be transferred from the Travel and Mileage allowance account in Community Development Administration, and $3,000 from the salary Account of Planning, to the Printing Account in Planning. This appropriation and transfer will meet the additional costs incurred for the rest of the Fiscal Year, and will more accurately reflect costs for the Community Development Department. r/ 9 I 1 lJ J 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 18, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineero' SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds Tract 9436 - located south of Victoria and east of Haven Avenue OWNER: Crismar Development Corporation 2120 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 200 Santa Monica, California 90406 Monument Bond $2,550 Certification from Madole and Associates indicates that all final monuments have been set and they have been paid in full. Tract 9582 -2 - located north of Wilson and east of Haven Avenue OWNER: The Deer Creek Co. P. 0. Box 488 Alta Loma, California 91701 Monument Bond $5,720 Certification from Madole and Associates indicates that all final monuments have been set and they have been paid in full. LBH:bC 1 , GTY OF RANCHO CUCkNIO \GA c�2CA STAR REPORT • 0 DATE: November 4, 1981 0 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager aCC FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development 1977 BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N0. 81 -06 - T 8 M - A change of zone from A -1 (Limited Agricu ture to R- 3 /P.D. (Multiple Family /Planned Development) for the de- velopment of a planned residential subdivision consisting of 62 townhouse units on 5.4 acres of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Route - APN 208 - 211 -25 and 26. Related File: Tentative Tract No. 11144 ABSTRACT: The proposal before the Council tonight is for a total resi- dential development of 62 townhouses on 5.4 acres of land. In order to approve the proposal, City Council will need to approve the zone change from A -1 to R3 /PD and to issue a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 23, 1981, held a duly adver- tised public hearing to consider the above- described project and voted unanimously (5 -0) to approve the related tract map with conditions as • attached and recommended approval of the Negative Declaration and Change of Zone. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report of September 23, 1981 which fully describes the project. The project as proposed is consistent with all related City Ordinances and Plans. The proposed density of 11.5 dwellings per acre is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (4 -14 DU/AC). No adverse environmental impacts are anticipated as the result of this project. No correspondence was received by the Planning Commission, nor was there any opposition voiced at the Commission hearing. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approve the Planned Development Zone designation No. 81 -06 for the above- described project through adoption of the attached Ordinance. Respe tfp1 {11Jrys bmi to , �Jacleaii�lnn,, AICP Community Development Director JL:AT:jk Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - 10/23/81 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval City Council Ordinance x vin ORDINANCE NO. )60 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208 - 211 -25 & 26 ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE FROM A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental • impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessors Parcel Numbers 208 - 211 -25 & 26, approximately 5.4 acres in size and generally located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Route, is hereby changed from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to R- 3 /P.D. (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Reoort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ai , 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �q GUCAMOA'_ `C •`9 oI o 7 1977 DATE: November 18, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: .APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ii0. 81 -07 (TENTATIVE TRACT 71869 - ROBERTS GROUP - A change of zone from R- 1- 10,000 to R -3 /PD for a total planned development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land to be located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland - APN 201 - 252 -23, 25, and 26. . ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of October 14, 1981, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all public input re- garding the above - described project. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission found the project to be consistent with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other related policies and stan- dards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, the Planning Com- mission approved the Tentative Tract Map with Conditions of Approval for the specific Site Plan and has recommended adoption of the Change of Zone to the Planned Development designation. Some propertyowners within the vicinity of the project testified at the Planning Com- mission hearing voicing concerns over the condition of the Highland and Archibald intersection. Much of their concern was centered around the intersection and whether or not this project would cause additional hardships to that intersection. As a result of this testimony, the Planning Commission added a condition to this development that would require the developer to seek to improve the condition of the inter- section on. the south side by working with the City and affected propertyowners in gaining the appropriate right -of -way for street widening purposes. Also, the Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council earmark the Systems )evelopment Fees that would be generated by this project for use to the improvement of this intersection. The Planning Commission Staff Report and appro- priate Resolutions are attached for your review and consideration. 0 a1 Planning Commission Appeal - PD 81 -07 • City Council Agenda November 18, 1981 Page 2 Subsequent to the Planning Commission hearing, a group of homeowners in the area filed an appeal on the project. Please find attached a copy of the appeal letter and their concerns. Staff has met with the homeowners to help provide information regarding their concerns. Staff further arranged a meeting between the developers and the homeowner=_. however, one of the homeowners was ill and the meeting was never held. At the time of the writing of this Staff Report, no meeting between the homeowners and developers had occurred. ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission's decision to approve the Site Plan and related information is based upon the consistency with the General Plan and related Ordinances, policies and goals adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The General Plan for this area, which is located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland, designates a Medium Density Residential of 4 -14 • dwelling units per acre (Exhibit "A "). The General Plan had envisioned this higher density at this intersection as Archibald is planned as a major north /south boulevard with a street section of 120' and a center land- scape median island. In addition, the plan was based upon the potential Foothill Freeway which would border the south side of the project site. Therefore, it was envisioned that this density would help provide a buffer between these traffic corridors to other lower density residential develop- ments. The following is an analysis of the five points that were raised by the appellants within their letter. Density and size of units: The appellants feel that the density and size of the units are not compatible with homes in the immediate area. The closest single family tract is located across Archibald on the west side and the homes are backed up to Archibald and re- ceive their access through another interior street-. There will be approximately 215' from the existing single family residences on the west side of Archibald to the first units within the development on the east side of Archibald. Since the existing single family homes do not face this particular project, and the separation of the two are by major thoroughfares, the two areas do not relate that strongly in regards to the product type. I Planning Commission Appeal - PD 81 -07 • City Council Agenda November 18, 1981 Page 3 2. Access: The appellants feel that the entrance /exit on Archibald will be a traffic hazard. The project has two access points, one from Highland Avenue, and one from Archibald. The Highland Avenue access has been emphasized as the main entry to the development. As was stated previously, Archibald will be a 120' major divided highway with a median island. The median island will ultimately prevent left -hand turn movements out of the project on to Archibald. The median island was requirement for this project. The intent of the project is to utilize the Highland Avenue access as the main access so that individuals will use the existing intersection of Archibald and Highland for their turning movements. The access on Archibald is an adequate distance from the intersection of Archibald and Highland so that appropriate stacking and turning movements can occur without causing significant traffic hazards. 3. quality of the DeveI pment: TThe appellants feel that the quality of the proposed units is not compatible with the homes in the imme- diate area. Within the Planning Commission Staff Report you will • find elevations of the architectural design of the units. The architect developed a condominium unit which carries a traditional style that would blend in with a single family character. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the design and found them to be well done and compatible with existing and /or proposed units that may be placed in the area. 4. Highland Avenue: The appellants feel that Highland Avenue, in its present condition, is incapable of handling increased traffic burden. This project stretches approximately 1500 feet along Highland Avenue and will be responsible for the total improvement of the north portion of Highland 'Avenue. Any paving or widening on the south side of Highland Avenue that would be needed for safe traffic movements would be required as a result of the development of this project. However, the City Engineer has found that the improvements required on Highland with the development of this project would alleviate the existing narrow condition.. 5. School;: The appellant-, are questioning whether or not the schools are aide to handle the increased amount of students that may be generated by this development. The City and School Districts alike have found that condominium projects ranging in one and two bedroom units generate much fewer children that would a single family house- hold. As an example, a single family dwelling unit on an average would typically generate .5 students per household within the ele- mentary school category. Based upon these generation figures, this proposed development could generate 19 elementary school students, while if developed with approximately 40 single family homes, would Planning Commission Appeal - PD 81 -07 City Council Agenda • November 18, 1981 Page 4 generate 20 elementary school children. Therefore, whether developed with single family or multiple family units at a higher density, approximately the same amount of students would be generated. In addition, Building Permits are not issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga unless the School Districts certify that their school facilities can or will be able to accommodate the expected amount of students gen- erated by this project. The Planning Commission has thoroughly analyzed all aspects of this project and approved the project based upon the findings of its quality and consistency with the General Plan and other goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the consistency of this development with the adopted City General Plan and other Ordinances, goals, and policies, it is reconcmended that the Planning Commission decision be upheld and that the City Council set • this matter for public hearing for the adoption of the Zone Change at its meeting of December 16, 1981. �ctfu�:bmitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:MV: jr Attdchnients: Planning Commission Staff Report of October 14, 1981 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval Letter of Appeal • /. ' C ' MY OF � a AM 11 128 1981 �i819tN,81p►1�i8r4 TC: I embers of the City Counci I of .iantlo Cucamon;a ':embers of the ?Pncho Cucaronca Home - o•!vners Coalition S U3 J�CT: ,pceal = I cS1 hJ ?Ta : . cliT ANJ OEV :L,^;D =.T - '31- 07(TENTIATIV: T'?:.Ci 11240) - .7CB5RMS ;sic OF 'je, tho un.iersicned citizens of the *ancho Cueamon.ia Ho ^eo'vnars Coalition, do herebv file this appeal re+erdin^ the above ncted develoo"'er't. �s a rnncerned citizen ci =lition, - =.r, a.oceslin• the ol-na re :ir;in- . .olutinnLu• ber F- r-.-raoh '.0 ^ter ' and Parerr =oh 'G -ber 2. `►Avia 95„14liin h::. il�� ✓� 1. '.e feel that the density and size • of the or000sed units are not co�ratible -1th the ho.^es in the imn +ll �,t_ zrea. oe feel tht the _ntr -;nca/ xit on .Archibald will be a tr ,,fflc hazard. 3. ;o feel that the quality of the ol3nned units Is not compatible with the homes in the immedi >te area. a. ie feai that HI ^hlnnd(in its present c.ondititn) is lncao =.bie of hin'lin: the Inrreased tr>ffic burdnn. Fineily, e ouest Lon ,heth -r the schorl 11irtrlet .III be able to th> incr —ase etud•rnt. oonul,tlon ±r,'. r.rnvide tha ce ^a of - duu,tior th,t >,e oresantly hav- In our loc =I echools. S, x' C Czl '400, :' +. S, Conger, :;hair ,pan , Cn21 `durfxl Porst, Vice Ch ?t rn =n ~L4 Cheryl L. poly, 3ecrrt• Fprtaf ne Se,eI 1, Treasurer J7 • • RESOLUTION NO. 81 -116 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -07 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -1- 10,000 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR 9.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHI- BALD AND HIGHLAND AVENUES. APN 201 - 252 -23, 25 AND 26 WHEREAS, on the 30th day of April, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant • impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impart on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1931. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65355 of the California Governr ;ent Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 81 -07, 2. The Planning Coy ;mission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81 -07, 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. • 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 11869 shall apply to this Planned Development. r RESOLUTION NO. 81 -115 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11869 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11869, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Roberts Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total planned development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres in the R -1- 10,000 zone (R- 3 /P.D. pending), located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenue, APN 201 - 252 -23, 25, and 26 into 4 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. N041, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: • SECT'O`! 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11869 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to hur.ians and wildlife or their habitat; (ei The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. • Page I'.�LIU11 ilU. �i L�l1U Page 2 C r • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY _MATTES ss I, JACK. LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981 by the following vote to -:ii t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, Dahl, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None • ABSENT: COiMMISSIONERS: None • �D rte SOIUC1UFI U. v1 -11U Page 2 C (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the • environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11869, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION I. A minimum of ten (10) feet landscaped planter, as measured from north property line, shall be provided between uncovered parking areas and the north project boundary. 2. If the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe right -of -way to the north is acquired, revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval. 3. That vine pockets with irrigation be provided at car- port posts as indicated on elevations. 4. That a directory sign shall be provided at each project entry subject to City Planner review and approval. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. A17 interior private streets shall have a crown section. is 6. The applicant shall attempt to acquire necessary right - of -way at the southeast corner of Archibald and High- land, for street widening purposes prior to final map approval. The applicant shall coordinate efforts with staff. 7. The Commission recommends, to the Council, that the Systems Fees generated by this project, be earmarked to widen the Archibald and Highland intersection. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Secretary of the Planning Commission • 0 • • D rl; C L C O Y V A O Y C C � A T a EE C O T 3 E A— L d Y 3 O � — V U d O U C IF VI O O+ W ^ CI •r- C .0 61 L Y•�YL N Y�c Y cw n E W O A O T U1 N 6 Of CK C ^ o W.- T r p�L Y pJ w O N ter- Y N N E NL t L 1-O U O MIT 60�Y C 41 O W V L A C C O O Y C A �- AY� O r A C Y 6 L A A T Y A 41 ^9 L TV A N N N YY- W OIL K 6' 1' N C Y Y N O R W Z W W Z Z O L A E— O O O 4! 6 A T V V 41 V) N Vl L n � L A T�CJY VI Vl N . W W V O C £ CO — V W V U U U U OIL C9 O_ O ✓d' W C V- Q O C a S A T o C L Y N O p� ' U OI Ul E l LJ W N 0 • • D rl; CAI DEPARC150T OF CUMNITY OETELODMEMT STANULRD CO.-OltlomS snbj ec r. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-07 TT 11869) Acll,canc _ UBEBTS—GROOP Location:_7EC_Alchihdld 8 Ni9hlenEl Those Jens cneteJ are mum uoos of aDC r.nel. CDC "nA.;T SliALL COYIACT Lsf fI_ _a I'C' elfIS! ✓i FOR C� :PLIADCE WITH LIE FOLLOWING Lte pevtln.mn[ — r_ -- _X 1. $-it snail " developed in accordance with the m .pp,eapd sqe plans on fl le the Planning Die l Sven JnJ [nv' cnndi tire con ta m,, ht,.m. 2. RevK, site pLnz and I : :IIJ in9 eleva[wns in orpa ra Ling all coneltlonl of ul zbit tr +p:.a;eJ to V., Placmn9 Division prior to tisuence of ac lmn9 Cbr :u tp� s x ]. Aaproval of this re,.,,t mall .t wivx cen:pllance with all sections a thrn , Lom f rit Ulan'bg enoe rj ail othr APPlcable City Ordinances in effect ( a t '...acct_ t. lM developer shall on av':e )II lots with aJequa to sldeyard area fa, R¢•ea",. whacle z. ;:.u"uar[ to City Standards. X 5. Trash receptacle a,, shin be enclosed by a 6 fact high msonrY wall with ohstrac on, ga - pn ca t r n b s t to C", inJa. Location ball be Siwelco 1. app royal t .1 Ilu 11. :nnin9 'ei sit zt an. X6 loran vexes( tie tool na tonal ,all be a :titled to the planning Division i and appeal priur to .... anceV0, build l rig permits. _x 1. All roof APPnrteancen. including air onditloners, shall be architecturally integrated, 'hold" fries v. ... and ants and nu ffered from adjacent properties and '{reels ai «yu vrl by Ve Pl inns nq and DurlJ ing Di rin onz. x 5. Prior in any use of tier Project site or brim:'' activity being Comenced there--, all mneiti,, of al TOUI can,a,.uf herein Shall be Cmipleted to trip Sa t is act tan of tli Ciret[cr of C: rani,, Develop::uu[. x 9. this approval shall tr.care nun and vole If bonding permits a not Issued tar imif P,o)ect w12Mn .,v year frun I'm date of ...Jett approval. ID. As a Conditional fit Simi,, this project %Nil brow,, nu11 and void in er`b[een (181 mvntM 11 .1 dace of approval, unless .p'm'ts are issue: o w igil. -a is mapleree. r X 11. A detailed 1 - z and bnton9 pl+^ shall be zumalt:ed [ approved by the Plano inn Dir ra ken D,i;,r Izsun,e o! Lan Ring pennil . Such DI'm shall inrliwte stl e, 111- 111tion, 11'auon, n._ I still a.J metNd of slti pl ding. TO lighting aJ.erz elr ,fPoc, aa; a. out "c,rrl'e1. x 12. A11 moinmin9 Doolt d ns t..... •C the time of initldl development shall be k Dlar NJtoo- x 1D. T,•tu ... co Dedes[rl.n pata.ays :cross Clrful.,him aisles shall be .•Dpidee thmulrom the Jeales'r ant b connect d, ling, .ion down 'Pa.., .rid pollen banal uses. lJ ] Project Do. le. All train pick up shall be for Individal Ire public veu, if until with all receptacle, Shielded Centralised train ..top U,I,, ,a Dfort died. I5. stand., ratio cover Plans :hall be zulmlttea [o and Approved by t Pl o'er and Duiloing Official Drior to M City OCCUPdnCY of the first unit. K 36. All building', numbers and Individual uni It mall be identified In A clear and Concise earner. inCluding V,do,, Illuminalann. x I2. So La < eatall.r doors, security dead bolts and lock, shall be installed on eA,h unit In this project. X 16. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. _Y 19. All units within this develop Pre ment Shall be plumb'd to or adapted for • _ W vatrr hoe [I rig unit. x2U. Energy conpervimg building materials and appliances are required to be Incorporated into this project to include Such things at but not limited to reduCed Consun0tf.. shower heads, Otte, grade of ,riot, k ;pn, doubt. pelted .'mile.. :Mended oS,rNa,,. DilOtless appliances, plc. 21. This development shill provide an option to home buyers to Purchase • so4r water heating unit. Purchase 2Z. Action OfsthenFoothilleFire Protection 0 strrotthis tract to the satls- 23. Lo .1 and Niter Planned Equestrian Trails shall be Provided lhreughou, hie tract in accordance witl. the Equestrian Trail plan. A detailed eynq lr San Uv it plan indicating old tni, m ainym sl oi¢s, phrstul Conditions, fencing inJ vYeit central, in accordance. -Sin City equestrian troll Standards, shall bet submitted % the riniio approved by the City Planner prior to ,PpraS.1 and This 'tract small fan " annex to a e,im Un.roe district for maimtopan,o of ynAltrian trans. 25. with names shall be reHewed Amid 11M, id by the City Pgnne,, in accordance In [he dalted Street Xam'ng Policy, prior la approval and r ordation of the ft. map. map. ec �- 26. If this developMnt Intend, to restrict equestrian or animal related u... to specific lots ur prohibit then en f ra [IreIY. then a [upY of 'he C.C. D.'t ..il a be otnil lied [o and reviewed pY the City Planner Prior to 6 aDVforal of r e i 1 27 This rents, rInecon ormarc. u,,b Ten pl Percent housing affordable housing and /or criteria del metl in the Growth Iona s Do lines and Lt." harem, be. deteinalred by Current market rater rents land redl•rlf rA.... al noel knell ,be time of con lructien of the project As A, ant [o such "'All be mvrovee by the City Planner prior [o issuance aofsW [ding Permits. pa = -king 6 Yenicular Access X1. All parking lot landscaped islands 'ball have , mIrlwe outside dlmtnsion of S' and shall contain an lA• walk adjacent to paa'bng Stall. X 2. Parking lot trees shall be . ninlmue 15 gallon sift. x J, All two -war aisle widths swell M A ninimua or 26 feet wide. x e. t ^er•�'I,, ace Ct Sn5I1 LC p•nvl,ICi, rt inlCnance Tree and [fear, a m fi 2a Iret .11, at all to qr: J. /I ng Canz lruC[Pa. In aCeOrJJnfe with s Foothill S. All parlurg owed, shall M1C ,UUGIe ctrl ped. 6. All units Lull le provm.J ..r to au,..:a t!: garage door .omen. _X ). GsSgm[eJ visitor ,,kinj air 15 Stall to turf blocked. X_ a. the Covenants. Codes a..J r, St, .c ll an5 Shull restrict the storage of recreational vehicles c this vte ::ale., I! :1 au tal prmclp le Source of O an...rtalion for Ine ...... X 9. ty parking sea 11 be Per— ¢m within the interior ,Ircut a ti ml aisle of her than n des i9 na!rd ar vl 1. o— p areal V CU rats, [odes. and Pr!5 [r l,,iud, I'll) to dereh peed ty t'v +,.I twat and u rtbJ to the City Planning Div DI Sr I ..nor to Issum.. If ..uiWmg C. ttndgaring X 1. A detailed landscape and 1m91tlon Plan vhall be sutallied to and approved or Ine Pla main' Ulvrtron ymr to the isvenct nr 01111.13 permits. X 2- (a 1st ing Gres Shull be (eta,: v u e vGle. A and ft er plan Of ron is Vd,t'r the ut,i .ga Letlaer mt�p�c �. true add ty,, shim be L Y 1 $1111 plan n .1 [Ike Intl "'esmt the proposed '1"" what tries I` c be r n�rl.� Vi..15n.J entlid'. and where n t 3',1 eS will Lu p: innled r far Cta vaJ tiers. The plan 55 required er to be :s led !O and a:IR rave) by the Plana 1n9 Ul vi ti 0n Prior to approval alI'm I—, I'm mal graeng plan_ U x 1 Street trees, a m:n of IS galled sI,, or la..... Shall be installed In a"Ince v¢n the lien(. r : au 11 III,. A tree. for the City of Pauclm t eucuaenga and .hall be pl. it.. it a r rage of every l0' on into, for -'P� street, and 20' en ..tervr slim ts� a ,(_ e. A minimum of 50 tree, per gross acre, ta.prised of live following tlaes, mall be prnvlf. ^d within tl- dcvelcLn en t; 20 }2J' tea Or larger, ]0[ -IS gsllc., and !3;_S gallon. x 5. All landscaped areas shall be winlasned in a healthy and thriving can - diticn, fr. from weeds, train, and debris. _Y 6. All slope banks In at e sS if rive (5) leer In vertical height and Or 5:1 Or greater 11opC "it) el l ar..L Cat c.. and 1 fled In a mmiwc wltn slope planbug regalreen[s of tie ,,, of P,,i! Coilobula.o .in slope planting $hJl) include but not be 1171:-1 to rioted qrujud cover and appropriate yi.ruLt cud tree,. All S n plar • and _r 111tlun shell be ..........ly mm[aiuCJ m a faun-, ens ter i.1 eq C, d,Pnn by the developer until each drv.d.al unit 11 sold J,1 c bYn the buys(. Prior to re ltaiing nCcupancy for stns[ u f.�pee [inn of 1, 1I.P" mall be completed y top Planning Still to dcu.,l:.e lml it is in Satlspct.ry condition. V 2.. All part nys, open areas, a..d fan ,cuv.ng call to fully _111..nN by A Atiep.If" ass.CUtion Or vtW, .iNnz aeepla ble to the City. Such Drool of ns.ntenmce Snall be Sol - itt,J to it., City prier to Issuance of building Par.. l,, S. The front yard landscaping. And an I1,r.,r.ale irrigation system, $hall be ..stalled ay [M developer in acwrumce d[n suteittea plant. N PO 81 -,* TT 11869) Iva. 9, µhe final design Of the Wi meter part.:". walls. Ia nJlCa pl ng i.it aide. Iks Shull be nrtivdrJ In the rc.ui1`4 4rrJicap. Mdhs ard shall be suoject to JPProeJI by the Planning Divvon. 10. A minimum of S of Ina bees D1,It,d within live p,Ojai,. snA hall be specimen site trees. x 11. Sfeelal lamhcape leatores s cn as mounding, alluvial rata, ipeclgn SIt, trees. mrVnGering Sldeudlli (1111 Vartlfd and nUriton Lal CIrJnje1 and in lensi lieu IJndzcd ping, is required along D. Slant K_ 1. An, signs pro,oved for [n is dwnlopunt still be dnsigned In conformance with the C.h1rrIe.sire Sign Oro mince and shall repave review and approval by the Planning Division air.., to I.... 11, lion of such signs. 2, A .milovm elan progrm for this d,,olaaa`nt shall be sdWt(pJ to the Pum nig Dlvnlon for their review anri approval Prior m ",ueme or - D ildmg perm RS. J. The signs Indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate Icr, review and approval. E. Add l t led, I-AftEliYall s Ae fired I. De- el -maent Review INI) be aefempll5hed prior to the Istvance of A Building 2, Development Aeview shall by accomplished peter to recordation of lop final sulvllvitinn map. ,_X g, Approval of Tentative Tract Ito. 11 869i5 granted subject to the approves of _R1.auoe(L8eYP_kp. een.ElJu_8L- I1L - - - -_ —4. This which[ time Permit is add orpdelete cohoStTanipor hrevote the COnvitlonal use Pe.mit. S. The developer Is required to obtain the following signed statement by Purchasers of homes which have A private Or public equestrian trill on Or adjacent to [heir property. In purchasing the home located on tot Tra C[ -� on , 1 have real— a C.C. 1 k: s and s unde�out tnatiald toi is suelect to a mutual reapr.Cll eazmia<c for the pmpo.e -.7`,n-p9 equestnan trafllc to guln access. Signed Pu rcha see Said statement Is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. X 6. Prior [o approval and recordation of the final map, ar pr la to i nuance or bolldinq permits. Irlen no subdivision mip Is involved• writ[as certification fran all affected Scbool Districts, shall be submilIld to live 1111.1. 1!,nl of tammltr Development life' states that adequate zcwhl fa flints a fe ill De eaNble of accmned en ating zloacuts generated by lens Proj••c L Such IO [ter of certl RCJlion adult have been issued or the ScA,ol nn«.ct within s a-'Y (60) days prior to the final map approval In the case or the soh. diviilan Rip or Itlu.... Dr permits In the Ca Se of all other residential protects. F. G. ), pr i ior to anprnrnI and recordation of the final map, at prior to the Issuance of I•LM1••q Goalti .. -, It InrolveJ, written cer[[ficatinn frero the all ctrl . r Jntn[q ,teat aJequ.. to :—Pr tl•J uat,r facilities are v •111 ulal :Ir 1 terve t pin ,ea V olio[, 1h..II be iulmq L•d tv the 4`e,r!• +Jt o! C .'1 .t 5.[h 41111 m111 Lore 111— 1 .eJ Uy Ine .at" .`.11.cvt . r (f J) dais r to Ilnal nt,p tll'pl4ral 1 the wn ¢111 of ,.. niH in thx Cate of oil otnr.n 1..!en Liar prJJ t'1 [1. rlr !n �dectt oil Sept,c tank facilities allvwahl. or ine Stall na Cog cones , W.tral Gard and the C,ty. rwittzm ufIcat.aa .1 a n,ta ].I rtr. in<lu: i.vg all supF ltial Immmuon. shill ne Iota lneJ old 1u. -u1111 Io Ile e!tr. X B. This arywu.al shall 1,111. 2 1,11 and vaiJ If the t¢nt.tive wbdlrisio. m, ]per —, a 'n'3 ,.r tuil Jing 1--1 , issued w mrp is rvlvea, ., 0., LC21 v.'a 1 l_1 r'O'.th, rr..i Ilse agrovJl nl th�irpl O li'It Del... An e•:Lniidn has t_u gr. :atsd t) the Pfaming Common. 9. This su Nivislen .. -shed as a total development pa =ka,e and is evA to 111.11,1 far -ail a.nt ratum relllill In the Msi,n section or roc :.. :o :- a prior to final Navval are cord,ti.b OF the r'a, tf t.v' wbd l r r i... i g W to 1_uv`I apLd as trots roes. APPLICX67 SMALL CONTACT IMF BUIIBIa BIVNTOM FOR (P!PL:AnCE WIN THE FOLEWIMG C0.11TIC]5: - - - - - -- s•tr r. vet pa+aent p. The applicant stall Coep4 aryl the latest amp!ed Uniform Buildln9 Code. Unity ^.n ;•.•cem.[c>1 c.J,. c. m Pivvbang Cote, National Electric Eclu, and all dZ.,1 oppllU¢Ie [p.2i a.a,.1.1n,nCe, In bI!brI at the lire of Issuance of relative X Z. Prior to i,susrce If building Lernit, for corbuitl Ele curstruction, evidence to t a [v. - crnill D.i [ri [ fire Inner tIs vnVn.a rY dater 1l'w1Y or lira sort [e[ticn Iz a.J Valle. Gene,.9 [Pn,lxt,.n of r,,.,rPd fire P,atectzon syttea. _ Y ]. Prior to the issuance of a building pemit Ear a how residential dwelling nit(,) o ralp, a]oit[•�. to a nitI car ttw. the spol..... shall pay +. del.,exne feet at the e1 wl ? v zneJ m lain reez nvr seclude. but lint Ge Ism li eu [ City f! %. :.f elV Vi fee. Par: fao, Grain,,- fee, S,Stemz W el o;.mmt Fee, Jx¢.IL o. J Pfm Cnecling FLes, dad School FLes. e. Prior to the issuance of a Em 4iug D,—it for a new wlmercial or Industrial derNoflent ar SMitlan to a is tang e2r xt npren e, the aprHCart shall Pay ae-T..".t foal at tram a veil ulze rata, such fees ea, rclod,. but not be IIm ItW to: Syztvnz 4 xle;.nent Fee, Ora[noge Feb. Permit and plan CneUinl fins. X S. street add ...... . Me it to provided by the Wilding official. 6. U411 mI .,it, shall be a .rude...In fire rel.rd..1 m[eri]t and non to.rl.uz[Ihle ,nor mIlerial. _ ). All cormr u.A I.ngz shall nail the Wilding elevation facing the street uP'Ireded with aldrtmonal .cad Ina around windaa, and wood siding or Plant - ins where al'Lrrpna[c. (( =al uny5truau.rs _ 1. Provide Cmx,lrance with tl.e Uniform Building Code for properly line elearanc¢s toaPJ¢rlog use. area and fine -rezi3 ti: one ss of existing building,. I. canting ou iidinl(z) shall n w to c .nly with cent Onil,inI and Zan m9 rrq.Iotn.., for toe r.l -i.d us, or she Euilaing shall lie d<awllshed. 1 Ni%tin9 se.Age disposal facilities ,hail be r. *,ed. filled antic, capped to tmPly with the UnilDm ilu ^sing Code, and Unifon. Building Code. • PO 80 -07 (Up,j),$p?). M. Gradin. 1. trading of the subject property shall be in acwrdance with tine Anil. - la.ilning (ode, Ill, Grading StandllJl and a:lx,!rd qn fin. Vr,rttl[ez. ire lira +l grad m9 pion 11'al1 Oe In Sablt+ntpl [on forma rate .,to Ne +gpfarN conceptual grading 'lb. X Z. A sails report Shall be prepared by A guar /fled engineer licensed by the State of California to p¢rform l.In wort, ]. A .¢01091 o1 report shall it prepared by a W /ilfied engineer or gealo gi It and sb[xmtled at the time of appl,be Li on for 9r>dio, plan check. X a. The final grading plan shall be Sbb]ect io review and approval b, the trading Couuittte and shall be completed prier to . cordalion or be final su Ldi,ision map or issuance of building permit whichever cans first. S. AS a custcm. -lot s¢bdiviilon, the following regu l "even [t shall be Feb A. Surety sba11 be posted and an agreement executed. ba,antIlin, of all on -site drainage facilities net ... a,, for deatct,t" all Da ., m the satisfaction of [ly Building and Safety Division. b. Appropriate etseoienti, for safe disposal of draiwge water that are anducted unto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the aatisl¢tiOn of the Building and Safety Division. C. On -site drainage Improveen[a, necessary for devate,inq or protecting tl.e S..hJ hided properties, are to be !.stone] prior to Issuance of Wilting permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject W, .1 cuntri Ouaes to, drainage flows entering. leaving o r .!torn a parcel relative to which A building p,relt is requested, d. final Iran;., plans tar eacn parcel a e to be lohmt Led to the Ovfldinq .d Safety Division for appal v+l prior to htomlte Ot Wilding Permit,. lihis may be on an increvental or Iompusite basis.) p All slope banks in excess of five i5) feet in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater Slope .ball be seeded with rats .. ...sirs ...... comllitlen of grading o ¢Liar alterative —hood of ! ontrvl sMll be ae..pletedr to the satinfoCtion of IMe building Offoi Cial. Irrigation Shall be y-.0d,i to Iercin.t, tM[ seed and .narotafn growth to a O,b, 6 months after germ lna ti on. APPI-MA T SHALL UPPIACT THE EIIGIGEERIhG OI'1I51at1 FOR COMPLIANCE WIN THE FcALcWLHq^ CanurtlmlS: I. Dedications and vehicular Access 1. Dedications Shall be made by final Pap of all interior street rights - of --.ay and all necessary ea seman[s as tlw.M on Lee tentative m.,D. -1-2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the fallowing Street,: 17 additional feet an Archibald Avenue _aanmm�,l feet]. �Ii_g61 Sid- AYeilUe -_ aJJI UOna1 Icee a.. X B. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. �- e. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress frog shall be dedicated as follows: X S. Reciprocal easements Shall Oe Provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or Parking area,, and ,hall De noticed Do the map or Shall be recorded Cancorrent with the sup. • • 6.aenote providers mall he made for the ingress, egress and Internal culatn of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to a m e pexr[y or In Ire .eoaio. of the 11.1.111 ,Morns. ). Pn wee dral,a I ealveh -ts lur pro s -lot ells -9e shall he required and se 111 be del mOtmd or ndt :C,dlon the final rap- x 6. All emlmq cise.ents lying within future right -of -way are to be g.ItCb —J or to be Jelin :v :ed on the cup per City Eojinelr's ,,ol nment, _ 9. Lsrn<n t1 for s vile for p.�blie T[Y shall he Celit.ted to W1 C111 .r.,re Sidr- milts, naarler through private properly. J. Stn e,tt I -±rn_ nes _ L Cnnstr.ct full sbrrt irpr.vem:nti including, but not limited to, urn and 9.tter. A.C. pa.r.nC. tilenalY, drive approaches. park noy [reel and Street 11 ,!1L1 I:l all interior Street,. 2. A eiriv— ul 26.f, nt -Jr ......ot within a ao -foal wide dedlcated rgut- of -way shall be co.",.eted for all half- seclmn streets. X ]. Co stru :c trm following r ann9 improvev.ents including, but not -- 11-11i to: 't -Includes land..... ng and : r:yuon on Hater. 1 X a. Prior to any work being performed in the Public right -of -way, fees shall ee .am are n +ant De-it Bran be obt.int. from lime City f..9lneer's Uffice,I ,aadditmn to any other permits required. X 5. Sbeet impmcmmnt plans aDDroved by the City Engineer and prepared by d k.'T 1[erN Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street - . :ALS. P. ar to 1 1 arse of an encrJSM.ent Permit. Final plans all prafill: 11.11 uov cee location of all ala[Sng utility f.cila bas v6nin the right -a Ludy. X 6. Surely shall be pe.&ted and an agreement eaecoted to the s¢ISf'llion of the City Engmcer and the City Attorney, ytd,aht,,irg mapletion of [II fuhlrt o r en[S. prior to record mg of in, cap or the issuance of building Cer.nl u. vh,ch,,er cav11 first. X ). All street improvments Shall he installed to the iktllhetion of the -- C,ty E"neeq pear to Call. rely. X 0, Pa.rnent Striping, mmking. Infnc and street I. signing 1111 be Installed per [Le nqurrllletl of the City Engineer. _ 9. Listing city real requiring recanstroction shall remain open for traffic at all tireS vRb adegodR detours during ConStruc[nn. A CJSh d ^PnSII Sb_II be rrg.Ifrd to cover the cost of grading and ng, which Shal I to n]ed on completion of the ConitmCbon to lire satisfaction If [te City Engumar- 4 X 10. Walkway& Shall be provided between public sidewalks and on -site ,milmtrian areas. X 11. Concentrated desire,, flaws shall nos Call sl dewalks. alder slCCwa IY drain, mall be Installed to oily stInd,,d,. _ 12. An energy dissipater and/or erosion control measures ,hall be Installed to Ilse SJ tilfaellaq of the City Engineer. at the end of Stub Str,5•I,. A letter of acu`V Wnm of drainage runoff Iron the d— ItIca.m properly o.cers spJll be required. A. DrtmaE died Eland Control X u b 1. The aPJ.Iint will be responsible for con.[ruber of all on -site -- drai v,e facilities required by the city Engineer. 2. Intersection drains win be required at the ronaring locations: _ l The proposed project falls within areas indicated as ,object to floadin9 under the national Flood Insurance Prol,am and it Subject to the rr.-+ inns of chat program and City ordinance qa. z1. X e. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a storm dram. S. Aee•luate pravaSlam shall be made for .«,,tame and dS .... at of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. _ 6. letter of acceptance from do—Itream property owners shall be required where runoff free the tract flows onto private Draperies. ). shall be designed as major water Carrying .[reel.Slfeels regT n�comblrabnh of IleC:al curb heights, II1.111.1 lyl :e drive apprllllml. rolled street connections. flood ymteCLian walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property lire. X B. The following stone drum Shall be Installed to the satls4[llon oe the City Engineer: At the southwest corner of the property as sjinlr �rtTenfaE -I -vC- fait- 1R��sFapoSe d- A�a1tr sna11_6�tonneceP(I �o_�re_5i4Yln�[31n_"D7i �tir�h. _ 9. Pr or to recordation of the map, a broad -scale hydrologic and drainage Study far the yr.jL,l 3111 be Sublilted to the City Engineer for review. L. Utilities I. Provide all utility services to each lot Including sanitary senors, water, electric .nor, gas, telephone 2. All utilities within the project shalt be Installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KY. J. Utility 0 ... can" shall be provided to the specification of to. Sgfviol utility Companies and the City Eoglnccr. a. Developer shill be responsible for the relocation of ealsling public utilities. as required. Y S. apvelnyer &hall be responsible for Inc Installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern CalifornB Edison Company and City Standards. e: J S A A_C- F Fur. d d v e ec- c c. M M �I A'I UtIIER -Includes land..... ng and : r:yuon on Hater. 1 X a. Prior to any work being performed in the Public right -of -way, fees shall ee .am are n +ant De-it Bran be obt.int. from lime City f..9lneer's Uffice,I ,aadditmn to any other permits required. X 5. Sbeet impmcmmnt plans aDDroved by the City Engineer and prepared by d k.'T 1[erN Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street - . :ALS. P. ar to 1 1 arse of an encrJSM.ent Permit. Final plans all prafill: 11.11 uov cee location of all ala[Sng utility f.cila bas v6nin the right -a Ludy. X 6. Surely shall be pe.&ted and an agreement eaecoted to the s¢ISf'llion of the City Engmcer and the City Attorney, ytd,aht,,irg mapletion of [II fuhlrt o r en[S. prior to record mg of in, cap or the issuance of building Cer.nl u. vh,ch,,er cav11 first. X ). All street improvments Shall he installed to the iktllhetion of the -- C,ty E"neeq pear to Call. rely. X 0, Pa.rnent Striping, mmking. Infnc and street I. signing 1111 be Installed per [Le nqurrllletl of the City Engineer. _ 9. Listing city real requiring recanstroction shall remain open for traffic at all tireS vRb adegodR detours during ConStruc[nn. A CJSh d ^PnSII Sb_II be rrg.Ifrd to cover the cost of grading and ng, which Shal I to n]ed on completion of the ConitmCbon to lire satisfaction If [te City Engumar- 4 X 10. Walkway& Shall be provided between public sidewalks and on -site ,milmtrian areas. X 11. Concentrated desire,, flaws shall nos Call sl dewalks. alder slCCwa IY drain, mall be Installed to oily stInd,,d,. _ 12. An energy dissipater and/or erosion control measures ,hall be Installed to Ilse SJ tilfaellaq of the City Engineer. at the end of Stub Str,5•I,. A letter of acu`V Wnm of drainage runoff Iron the d— ItIca.m properly o.cers spJll be required. A. DrtmaE died Eland Control X u b 1. The aPJ.Iint will be responsible for con.[ruber of all on -site -- drai v,e facilities required by the city Engineer. 2. Intersection drains win be required at the ronaring locations: _ l The proposed project falls within areas indicated as ,object to floadin9 under the national Flood Insurance Prol,am and it Subject to the rr.-+ inns of chat program and City ordinance qa. z1. X e. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a storm dram. S. Aee•luate pravaSlam shall be made for .«,,tame and dS .... at of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. _ 6. letter of acceptance from do—Itream property owners shall be required where runoff free the tract flows onto private Draperies. ). shall be designed as major water Carrying .[reel.Slfeels regT n�comblrabnh of IleC:al curb heights, II1.111.1 lyl :e drive apprllllml. rolled street connections. flood ymteCLian walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property lire. X B. The following stone drum Shall be Installed to the satls4[llon oe the City Engineer: At the southwest corner of the property as sjinlr �rtTenfaE -I -vC- fait- 1R��sFapoSe d- A�a1tr sna11_6�tonneceP(I �o_�re_5i4Yln�[31n_"D7i �tir�h. _ 9. Pr or to recordation of the map, a broad -scale hydrologic and drainage Study far the yr.jL,l 3111 be Sublilted to the City Engineer for review. L. Utilities I. Provide all utility services to each lot Including sanitary senors, water, electric .nor, gas, telephone 2. All utilities within the project shalt be Installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KY. J. Utility 0 ... can" shall be provided to the specification of to. Sgfviol utility Companies and the City Eoglnccr. a. Developer shill be responsible for the relocation of ealsling public utilities. as required. Y S. apvelnyer &hall be responsible for Inc Installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern CalifornB Edison Company and City Standards. 4 X 10. Walkway& Shall be provided between public sidewalks and on -site ,milmtrian areas. X 11. Concentrated desire,, flaws shall nos Call sl dewalks. alder slCCwa IY drain, mall be Installed to oily stInd,,d,. _ 12. An energy dissipater and/or erosion control measures ,hall be Installed to Ilse SJ tilfaellaq of the City Engineer. at the end of Stub Str,5•I,. A letter of acu`V Wnm of drainage runoff Iron the d— ItIca.m properly o.cers spJll be required. A. DrtmaE died Eland Control X u b 1. The aPJ.Iint will be responsible for con.[ruber of all on -site -- drai v,e facilities required by the city Engineer. 2. Intersection drains win be required at the ronaring locations: _ l The proposed project falls within areas indicated as ,object to floadin9 under the national Flood Insurance Prol,am and it Subject to the rr.-+ inns of chat program and City ordinance qa. z1. X e. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a storm dram. S. Aee•luate pravaSlam shall be made for .«,,tame and dS .... at of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. _ 6. letter of acceptance from do—Itream property owners shall be required where runoff free the tract flows onto private Draperies. ). shall be designed as major water Carrying .[reel.Slfeels regT n�comblrabnh of IleC:al curb heights, II1.111.1 lyl :e drive apprllllml. rolled street connections. flood ymteCLian walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property lire. X B. The following stone drum Shall be Installed to the satls4[llon oe the City Engineer: At the southwest corner of the property as sjinlr �rtTenfaE -I -vC- fait- 1R��sFapoSe d- A�a1tr sna11_6�tonneceP(I �o_�re_5i4Yln�[31n_"D7i �tir�h. _ 9. Pr or to recordation of the map, a broad -scale hydrologic and drainage Study far the yr.jL,l 3111 be Sublilted to the City Engineer for review. L. Utilities I. Provide all utility services to each lot Including sanitary senors, water, electric .nor, gas, telephone 2. All utilities within the project shalt be Installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KY. J. Utility 0 ... can" shall be provided to the specification of to. Sgfviol utility Companies and the City Eoglnccr. a. Developer shill be responsible for the relocation of ealsling public utilities. as required. Y S. apvelnyer &hall be responsible for Inc Installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern CalifornB Edison Company and City Standards. 4. Valor am Qwer plans shall be 601i.ed and can't ... I'd to reel I1- ireari, of the CuNmungo GWnty Wier District (eruul. ron Lin file 011,111, .1 t the tnvvonn lal neap, d•M1a ,uru, fir um tean, of San Br1na.J inn. A letter of Compliance on CCRD .ill he required Prior to ree.1dolmn. 1. IYp, ovaH I,"' not Bern 111ullil Iron all utilllles aM .11— inle.e:,ea .,ocill m.olvrJ. ....Oral Of in, final nap will pe subject to any regwirtments that nay be firm, t5mn. R 4ntrtl Rr drwmis find n. royals 1. permit' Iran amer agencies .ill Be required as rondo': A. ra Rrans for: D. Co +'Lr Du1, M1ba trumnt red fired n•iw to—id euon eC or- 9,aJm'I pe, iiq _ C. San Bernardino County flood Control District D. Other: I. A copy a the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C. C. 6 R.'S1 and article, of Incorporation of 11 "mender, nssoc cation, supjert to the a,Proval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded .ith this map and a Cooy Provided to the Cit, i. final .,heel aid tract haw shall courfam to City standards and procedares. a. A parcel map shall be recorded prior to first phase subdivision to prevent creation of un't'ar ited week. _ S. prior to recordation, a notice of Intention to term and /or join- 1l landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the city CC 61. }he en 10121 ing Casts involved in p15[r TIC formation Shall be borne by 'he devehaper. �t _ 6. Of per vot— ta.-dsuped park•ays a,. reheired 1. be arreRed 5 ^ta in, l..JSCare maintenance district. J. tacdscapins and irrigation systems required to to Installed an public 1a91y-0a,uy on in, perimeter of this tract area 'r ❑ be .ontunuuusly hntained by the developer until accepted by the city and ann.acd ma the landsca pe maintenance district. 5 P14J.'t Da. 0 0 • 0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 14, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81 -07 TENTATIVE TRACT 11,.6'T—'II ER 5 GROUP - A change of zone from R -1- 10,000 to R- 3 1P.D. fora total planned development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land, to be located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland - APN 201 - 252 -23, 25, and 26. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a planned devel- opment and associated Tentative Tract Map, (Exhibit "C "). The project will consist of 136 condominium units on 4 lots to be located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenues. The proposed project meets the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Requirements, and has passed the City's Growth Management and Design Review process. Therefore, the Planned Develop- ment, Tentative Tract Map, and issuance of a Negative Declaration should be considered by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: The applicant has requested review and approval of a 136 unit project on 9.75 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenues (Exhibit "A "). The project site consists of an existing chicken ranch, two single family residences, vacant fields, and mature trees. The site is currently zoned R -1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential), and is designated for Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) on the City's General Plan. The proposed project density is approximately 14 units per acre and is therefore consistent with the General Plan. The project site is bounded on the north by Eucalyptus windrows and vacant lard, on the south by Highland Avenue and the proposed Foothill Freeway Cor- ridor, on the east by single family residences (a proposed 67 townhouse unit project) and on the west by Archibald Avenue and single family residences as indicated on the Site Utilization Map (Exhibit "B "). The surrounding zoning is also shown on Exhibit "P, ". There is an AT &SF railroad spur right -of -way along the north project boundary, which is no lonqer used for rail purposes, The applicant is considering purchase of this land to expand their project area. An appropriate condition has been attached to require City Planner approval on any expansion upon the project before the Commission at this time. 3g ITEM F 0 STAFF REPORT October 14, 1981 Page 2 The project has been reviewed and rated by the Design and Growth Management Review Committees in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance. The project received a point rating in excess of the required threshold and is therefore eligible for Planning Commission review. In addition, the Concep- tual Grading Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and has re- ceived conceptual approval. ANALYSIS: As noted above, the project will consist of 136 condominium units. Dwelling unit type "B" are two -story stacked units on top of car- ports. Dwelling types "A ", "C ", and "D" utilize a combination of carports and uncovered parking. The attached elevations (Exhibits "H -1 -2 ") indicate that the units have been designed as two story and two and one -half story units, with one and two bedroom floor plans ranging from 849 square feet to 1,250 square feet (Exhibits "I- 1 -2 "). Each unit will have a private yard enclosed by a low profile plaster wall and private decks upstairs. The proposed construction materials include cedar shingle roofing, masonite • siding with wood trim and railing, exterior plaster, and brick or stone veneer. In addition to private open spaces, a meandering water element and green belts have been provided. Recreation facilities include two each of: swimming pools, spas, small open play areas, and tot lots. The main project entrance will be on Highland Avenue, with a secondary access point on Archibald Avenue as shown on the attached Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "D ". Both access points have been designed with heavily land- scaped center medians. A private drive has been provided around the peri- meter of the project site for interior circulation. A total of 35 guest parking spaces have been provided throughout the project site to maximize availability to all units. A continuous pedestrian circulation system has been provided throuqhout the project linking the units with common open space areas and visitor parking areas. The Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit "E ", and Exhibit "J ", Highland street - scape, indicate an equestrian trail in the Archibald right -of -way. Both the Equestrian Committee and Staff concur that equestrian trails should be limited to the equestrian /rural area defined in the City's General Plan. Therefore, the community trail designation on Archibald Avenue would in- clude only a pedestrian sidewalk and bicycle land on the pavement. J C C • STAFF REPORT October 14, 1981 Page 3 Based upon the Grading Committee's recommendation the project site has been graded to drain into catch basins and storm drains that will connect with the storm drain in Archibald Avenue. The remaining surface water runoff will be collected into box culverts and carried under sidewalks to the streets. In addition, flood protection devices will be required along the north project boundary lines. The Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit "E ", provides for an abundance of landscaping throughout the project site. The Design Review Committee rec- ommended to the applicant that special attention be given to the treatment of the Archibald and Highland corner. The applicant has provided a low accent wall, berms, and specimen size trees at this location as indicated on the Exhibit "J ", in order to soften the visual impact of the proposed project from this intersection. Both Archibald and Highland Avenues have been designed with substantial landscaping such as raised contour berming, specimen size trees, and meandering sidewalks. Because of the drainage structures and proposed 6' masonry wall along the north project boundary, the net landscaping width between the parking stalls and the north project • boundary will be minimal. Therefore, it is recommended that the attached special condition be adopted requiring a minimum 10' landscape planter as measured from north property line, as indicated on the attached Exhibit "L ". Because of the location of the interior circulation road, the building set- backs are substantially greater than required which maximizes the affect of berming and landscaping on Archibald and Highland Avenues. Uncovered parking spaces located near Archibald and Highland Avenues have been de- signed with turf blocked treatment. The attached Exhibit "K" indicates existing vegetation on -site, with the possibility of preserving selected healthy trees. • The Design Review Committee reviewed the building elevations and architec- tural designs of the project and has recommended approval of the project. Colored renderings and elevations of these buildings will be available for review and comment at the Planning Commission meeting. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. In addition to Part I of the Initial Study, an expanded Initial Study was pre- pared and is on file. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. I STAFF REPORT October 14, 1981 Page 4 40 CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in The Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 27 public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property owners. To date, Staff has received no public input regarding this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed Planned Development and Tentative Map and conduct a public hearing to consider all public comments. if, after such review, the Commission con- curs with the attached findings and proposed Conditions of Approval, a motion to adopt the attached Resolution of Approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Resolution of Approval for the Zone Change would be appropriate. Respectfully ubmitted, -JAd, LQi1, AICP, Director of Community Development JL: DC: kp L Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Phasing Plan Exhibit "H -1 -3" - Elevations Exhibit "1 -1 -2" - Floor Plans Exhibit "J" - Highland Streetscape Exhibit "K" - Existing Vegetation Exhibit "L" - Proposed Landscape Revision Initial Study Part I Resolution of Approval Conditions of Approval • 141 '• t� NO RTIi CITY OF ITe.v: !RD 21-07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA T111L NNW PL \ \ \I \G DI\ ISi0\ IiS1111iIT �SCAI ;x Ile I !f, it Single Familji — R 1- 8500 -T t 4.14u/a - R-1-12 -T 4 -14u/a i yu� R 1 -101ur r it C \ R 1 -8500 T R- -8500 T i ;00-T V NORTI I J • CrmI 01' ITI;.%[: .. f2p g1 --0 R;1\CI -I0 CUCAMO\GA TITLI NAil2 51T� rlo� PLANNING DIVISION RUflBIT _ -P_SCnLE i c c 0 CITY OF RANCHO CCCANIO \GA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM - W %I-o7 TITLE -MPwtA'rlV5 E. \I11111T __d SCALE: 144 _ G� NQRTI I C AL MG B 11.9._ pm CITY OF RANCHO CUGV IO\CA PLANNING DIVISION VV NORTH C 0 ITEM: -eo) % TITLE DETAILr'O '=fL • EX1118IT — SCALE: — q6 C • :ti M, :'I' E..'. n F t`. J CITY OF RANCHO CL:CANIO \GA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: IPP--if -o7 EAI MIT —ice— SCAT i KOK7 F I LEGENO crry ot,, RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING uvisio.N NORTH ITEN 1; -- . � 51-07 'riTtY.: 4NIEMAL—� - . FNI IMIT: sc;\[.E: — , lq? 3 • • • 9 ffll-s ati v CITY OF RANCHO CUCANION( "A PLANNING DIVISION NORTI i TULL exrm>rr H-7. S -C—ALI �v i C� CITY 01" RAINCHO CC:C NUNGYA PLANNING DIVISION N )RTFI rrh.�l: 1'D 51'07 TITLE; LxIlmir: SCALD 1(7 • • nl�011 E 33 c CITY OI' RA\CI-IO CUC MONGA PLANNING DIVISION NORTI I TITI.E:ONITS A,G,D' - >✓ �71V [ �� EX I I I RI'P � H - I Sc-Au: _ ;�'6 OAM-�Icp� a�°-�E. O- NOR TI I Ll CITY 01" iij-m:-PPSI-07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:. efAgFt%T MaYAT2VII 10 PLANNING DIVISION EXI IIBIT: --R� scm.r: 0 • FT T4�tt.. CITY OF I-rr%1: RANCI 10 CUCA N IONGA PLANNING DIVISIO.\ V INORTI I S. CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMONGA 1)1,,\NNI.'*-,(', DIVIJ!O.N I NORTI I • • • I '. i iw3 V l lR,Irl :..'",P 0K4 _4 WaMerilg Walk NORTI I CITY OF H [:.% 1: P125 -07 1tl'11CI_10 CUCANI0 N'G1 Iik� N2 _5 _ u. PLANNING DIVISION ScALF: r � n Pi scale 1 inch = 128 feet LEGEND Q BLUE GUM EUCALYPTUS WITH JUNIPER D DEGDAR PASTURE S SWEET GU T ;M;,RISK 'WINNOW O MINGSA M PWGNOLIA X SHAIIEL ASH P Pi:;E TREES L "BRUSH LENG.; BOTTLE F Fir TREE W 'WALNUT B JAPANESE BLACK PINE IORTII CITY OF ITEM: AD '21 -C7 1Z.1 \CFIO CUCAMONGr1 TITl.c.s�l``aPl�a PL:VN\ING DIVIS(c).\ ezlni;IT_�S_.- _sc,\Lr�_ 3ci to' waf T f T!1 71 -1-.1 al--n -7, CITY OF RANCIR) CUCANKAGA PLANNING DIVISION ED) ca 0 CCF NORTH i i - r. \ i: -!SJ --0-7- - TITLE: T6 1AU25CONfB Lm III Lm SCALE: - — 56 PROJECT TITLE: ROLLINGBROOK APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: _ The Roberts Group, Inc., 17748 Skvpark Boulevard - Suite 160 Tr,.iee ra Wflll (2 1n) 754 6242 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Toni Quezada, The Roberts Group, Inc. 17748 Skvpark Boulevard - Suite 160, Irvine. CA (714) 7.54 -6242 WC,P,TION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL V0.) Northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Hi0hland Avenue . Assessor's Parcel No.'s 201 - 252 -23, 201 - 252 -25, 201- 252 -�6 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STAT°_ AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None Ereected we i ')7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY • a i PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $90.00 'SI For all projects recuiring environmental review, this �1 form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Stud-v. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or ' 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning • the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: ROLLINGBROOK APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: _ The Roberts Group, Inc., 17748 Skvpark Boulevard - Suite 160 Tr,.iee ra Wflll (2 1n) 754 6242 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Toni Quezada, The Roberts Group, Inc. 17748 Skvpark Boulevard - Suite 160, Irvine. CA (714) 7.54 -6242 WC,P,TION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL V0.) Northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Hi0hland Avenue . Assessor's Parcel No.'s 201 - 252 -23, 201 - 252 -25, 201- 252 -�6 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STAT°_ AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None Ereected we i ')7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposed project involves the develo ment of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of partially develooed land z- 2 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND -. PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: The project site consists of 9.75 - acres. Additional information on the existing and proposed buildings on the orooerty is discussed in Attachment "A ". DESCRI£E THE ENVIRONZ=17AL SETTT_`7G OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDi:7G INIORKATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The environmental setting of the project site is described in Attachment "A ". r Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant enviromnental impact? The ProDosed oro'pct is not part of a larger project or one of a series of cumulative actions which may have significant environmenta _ imoacts. z- 2 WILL THIn PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. \J CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information recuired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evauuation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date anril 10.1g91 signature _— prank.Iyn,)s—Z iznd" Title �Assbciate Director Ultrasystems, Inc.. 2400 Michelson Drive Irvine, CF 921-15 _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of _ potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any Y£5 answers above: "Yes" answers are �i discussed in Attachment "A "(ap„ o-„pc? IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. \J CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information recuired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evauuation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date anril 10.1g91 signature _— prank.Iyn,)s—Z iznd" Title �Assbciate Director Ultrasystems, Inc.. 2400 Michelson Drive Irvine, CF 921-15 RESIDENTIAL CO".ISTRIIC.IO`3 The fo11o•n ing info. cation should be provided- to the City of Rancho-C&za onga Planning Division in order to aid in aesessina the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential developr, _. Tract No. 11869 Name of Develgper and Tentative Tract No.: The Roberts Group Specific Location o_° Project: Northeast corner Archibald and Highland Avenues PHASE I Plii SE 2 PEAS- 3 PRAS: 4 _ 7 , _. N=-2r o_ single _ family units: N/A . Nu-:: *_er c' aultin_le 38 136 far..ily un'_ts: 32 29 37 Date V =noosed to bec'; _cc s- ructicn: 4/1/82 7/1/82 10/1/82 1/1/83 ' Lar_iest -ate o' o co•_!,_,c:•; 10/1/82 2/1/83 4/1/83 7/1/83 Modn1 and = of Tentative fle "'•-ocr Price Rance ?� t� A - 1 Bdrm 78,990 _ 8 6 12 8 34 B - 2 Bdrm 86,990 12 12 10 8 42 C- 2 Bdrm 87,990 6 7 9 16 38 0- 2 Bdrm /Den 89,990 6 4 6 6 22 • CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 18, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASS ESSPIENT AND PLANNED DEV LOPMENT NO 81 OB TT lig7 5HAFFER /WESTLAND VENTURE - A change of zone from R -1- 10,000 to R- 3 /P.D. for the development of 67 townhouse units on 5.85 acres of land located at the northside of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -31. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of October 14, 1981, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider public input regarding the devel- opment of the above- described project. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission found the projects to be consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and therefore approved Tentative Tract No. 11928 with appropriate Conditions on the specific site plan and recommended approval for the Change of Zone from R -1- 10,000 to R- 3 /P.D, to the City Council. Several homeowners within the vicinity of the project voiced concerns on the intersection of Highland and Archibald. Althouoh this project is not immedi- ately at that intersection, it was felt that the additional development in the area may add additional vehicle trips at that intersection which was felt to be inefficient in its present state. Therefore, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the Systems Development Fees, that would be generated by this project, be earmarked for the improvements to the inter- section of Archibald and Highland. Subsequent to the Planning Commission hearing and approval of the project, a arouo of homeowners within the area submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the Tentative Map and subsequent development. Please find attached a copy of the appeal letter which outlines some of the areas of concern and reason for appeal. Also, please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report and the two Resolutions adopted by the Planning Commission; 1) adoption of the Tentative Tract Map, and 2) recommenda- tion of approval on the change of zone. This report will deal with the 6 concerns that were listed within the letter of appeal from the concerned homeowner group. Staff has met with the homeowners to help provide direction to them regarding their concerns and has tried to coordinate efforts between the concerned homeowners and the developer to re- solve any potential problems. A meeting was scheduled between the homeowners and the developer, however was cancelled due to illness of one of the committee members, therefore, at the time of the writing of this Staff Report, no meeting between the developer and the homeowner group had been accomplished. 0 STAFF REPORT November 18, 1981 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The following is a break down of each of the issues that were cited in the letter of appeal and Staff's analysis of such: u Density: The appellants state that the density proposed by this development, which is approximately 11.4 dwelling units per acre, is not compatible with homes in the immediate area. The recently adopted General Plan designates this project site and surrounding area as Medium Density Residential ranging from 4 -14 dwelling units per acre. Please find attached as Exhibit "A" a location map which includes the surrounding land use, zoning and General Plan. As can be seen by the Exhibits, the project falls mid -block on the north side of Highland Avenue, away from any existing single family residential tracts. During the adoption of the General Plan for this area, the Commission and Council found that with the amount of undeveloped land in this vicinity and the proxi -ity of the Foothill Freeway and Archibald that this area would provide an opportunity to create a buffer of higher density to the existing single family to the north and west. Therefore, the proposed • density was found to be compatible as existing single family tracts are some distance away and are not abutting this area. Existing single family residential tracts in this area will be separated by a major thoroughfare, Archibald Avenue. Archibald Avenue is projected to be a full 120' right -of -way street with a center median island. 2. Access: The appellants state that there may be internal tra fic problems because of a single entrance and exit. As always, Staff is critical in review of the circulation system on the internal project as well as the external circulation that would occur. The meer fact that only one entrance and exit is provided does not constitute a significant impact on the internal circulation system. The internal circulation system has been developed fully in accordance with both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Foothill Fire Protection District standards and requirements. A secondary emergency access is required for this project and will be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. • 6a STAFF REPORT • November 18, 1981 Page 3 3. Stackin g of Homes: The appellants feel that the stacking of homes is not compatible with homes in the immediate area. If this is in reference to the two -story structures of the proposed project, there is nothing else in the immediate area to compare with the proposed project design. Again, the General Plan does designate this area as a Medium Density Residential area which normally will require some two -story structures in order to achieve the amount of open space re- quired with a higher density residential development. 4. Guest Parking: The appellants feel that the development plans do not provide for adequate guest parking. The devel- opment plan has proposed 18 guest parking spaces which is in excess of the Planned Development parking requirements of 13. Under the parking requirements, the Zoning Ordinance requires 2.2 parking spaces per unit, of which 2 are to be covered within a garage or carport and the remaining .2 to be guest parking spaces. The majority of the guest parking areas are provided around the central core of the development • with a dispersement of other guest parking spaces throughout the development. As this is considered a smaller Planned Development, the Planning Commission felt that dispersement of guest parking spaces is not as desirable as limiting the guest parking to the main entry area and encouraging visitors to walk to the individual units. 5. Highland Avenue Traffic: The appellants feel that Highland Avenue is not capable of handeling the increased traffic flow that may be generated by this project. Based upon analysis of the City Engineer, it is his recommendation that with the improvements that will be required on Highland Avenue for this particular project that this project will not impact the capability of traffic flow for this area of Highland Avenue, 6, Schools: The appellants are questioning whether the School i3 stricts will have adequate capacity for maintaining the standard of education. We all are aware of the fact that the City of Rancho Cucamonga does not approve residential devel- opment without conditions which require each School District to certify that adequate capacity is or will be available at the completion of the development of the project. 9 STAFF REPORT November 18, 1981 Page 4 • In general, the Planning Commission approved this development and recommended the change of zone to the Council because they feel, from a planning stand- point, that this project can work in the area, given the parameters previously set by the General Plan. Further, the develo pment has been subject to rigor- of th ous Design Review requirements and has met all goals, policies, and standards e City General Plan and Ordinance. The Planning Commission constantly receives inquiries and questions on condominium projects regarding traffic and schools. Everyone is fully aware that many streets in the City are not developed at their full widths and will require widening when development occurs. If development does not occur, then the wideninqs will most likely not occur as well as the generation of System Development Fees that would be used to solve problem areas around the vicinity of the project. The additional thought which the Conmission used in its analysis for the approval of this project, was that the fact that this project and the one adjacent to it are either fronting on Archibald or will be adjacent to the proposed free- way. It is a well known fact that higher density projects are a more accept- able living environment adjacent to high speed corridors than are single family residential developments. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has found that the proposed develop- • ment is consistent with the General Plan and the goals, policies, and Ordin- ances of the City. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission decision and set December 16, 1981 as, the first Public hearing to consider approval of the Zone Change. Respec tfull smitted, L' Jack Lam, AIICCPP,, Directo Of Community Development JL:MV:kp • j.. �f� • k0 F, ZIE- im 4 Care if It � bD OCT 2819@ �ambcre of the city Council OT ?ancho Uc3mono.a the 9ancho Cuc:r.on,_e ;oTeo':•n:er [:o l iti an 4pneal of ENVI= CNV_NTAL ASSESSWENIT (TT 119 ?') V7'4TU4n the ttn:!er_i,n ?d eltl?eng ` th- ? ?nrho Cure.mon•-,a ''o ^en -•nere 7r,Htian, 4o h? e � fil thf; opoee.l rerar ^in- thq. at:ove natal de�.r- looment. As a concernei citizen coaitioo. !•e are appealin ^, the plans re- or-'In ^.snlutIon F , — "9, action ,, Paragraph nu -ter ?nd Fara-.r ^ph numb. 2. 1. : +e feel that the density of the proposed aevelopnent le not compatible with the hones in the Inmedlat_ area. _ .`e ?I th=.: .;I '.h the I it trd access 'h =t has been proposed, there •,•III 'ae Int -•rraI trl "Ia probI?mg- -, sIn "Ie intrance /East. r. `eel that unit ?_=ckim: Ig nor 1 - ._1.,r I7I? ••'Ith the homa. In the 14. i ?re;t. the r;r')COegj ±I -ter !'IV? - 'f1 °'1 t7 rr1Vf'!e .ie:rUdte -u.a par6:t . �. :. fe ^.1 that In ft� -.r-gent condition, r:ic')an' Is not papobI, pf hsn4IInc the increage•1 flow of traffic. E. ,.e question •.hether the school district will ze able to assimilate the Increased student population and provide the Rams st•,ndard of education that .we preFently have in our local scho•:Is. .rte; goal i-.:ur I( Pors, Vice ChiirTin oa dy, I III, rr.z.8sur�r • • RESOLUTION NO. 81 -118 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N0, 81 -08 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -1 TO R- 3 /P.0. FOR 5.85 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUES. EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. APN 201 - 252 -32 WHEREAS, on the 9th day of duly, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2, The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and • 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. • SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 81 -08. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81 -08. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Corinission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 11928 shall apply to this Planned Development. 67 Resolution No. 81 '18 Page 2 APPROVED ARID ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. • PLANNING COF )'MISSION OF TH61C,11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ng, no coram Ss I, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonaa, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dahl, Rempel, Sceranka, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None n U RESOLUTION NO. 81 -117 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COPVIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11928 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11928, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Shaffer & Sones /Westland Venture Co., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real oroperty situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total planned development of 67 condominium units on 5.85 acres of land in the R -1 -10 zone, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 252 -32 into 1 lot, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NO51. THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho . Cucaronga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11928 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. L� C} .asoiucion ho. 81 -111 Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the . environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11928, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A directory shall be provided near the entrance of the project to direct visitors to appropriate units. ENGINEERING DIVISION 2. The existing Hermosa Water Company easement for pipelines and reservoir shall be vacated prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. 3. The applicant shall address the merger of the Railroad right -of -way on the north with the project area, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant shall construct an adequate, con- crete lined channel with inlet and outlet struc- tures over the Alta Loma Overflow Channel, con- tiguous to the subject tract. It shall be constructed to ultimate design capacity per San Bernardino County Flood Control District's stand- ards and specifications. The cost of constructing the channel shall be credited towards the storm drain fee for the project. The City's standards storm drain reimbursement agreement will be exe- cuted to cover the contributions which exceed the fee amount. 5. All interior private streets shall have crown sections. 6. The Commission recommends, to the Council, that the Systems Fees generated by this project, be earmarked to widen the Archibald and Highland Avenues intersection. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLAinmr COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7J 0 Resolution No. 81 -117 Page 3 BY: ATT I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Carnission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, Dahl, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ?/ DEPARIVERT or (OTpIA1LY OEVELOPYERT STLJA3o COIOITIONS $ub, «r. _PLANNED NEIVELOPMETN 81 -08 TT 119281 nPpntanr. SHAFFER 8 SMS /WESTLA1_D VENTURE COMPANY tot.[+on: North side-of HitTiland Ave. east of Archibald Those itnro c.eca.A are cornitlovs of APPLICAtif S -VeLL CO.T.1CT ThE h::.yl'.1 DIV1Sl.i'1 FOR C@12LIA6CE WITH THE fOLt0AA0 Coto I T I O:IS: A. Sree D, cjopm nt 1. Site mall be do —J.,oJ In C C,dghCa with the approved site plans on file In [fie PLAh,h4 Dn,,I— did In, ,ndlli ins ontsinod herein. 2. Pe1[sed site plan: and b'a'Ning ele,stlons ihcQrMtAtihq all cundltlonS of aprrevel Shall be S'i:fit.lel [a tae Plannln] DIvill.. pi 1.1 to issuance Of Eu elm n9 permrts. X I. Epsvea,l of Lm, re0iest stall Out waive coxaplianue with all sections of the Zbmnl ONu.ance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at tl. -.e of 5mldinl Comfit 1,.oan.a. _ e. The developer shall o all lots with ader.oti, sideyafd area for R ecrea[lan Vv'n is to it rag. Gu rawfit to City Standards. X S. Trash receptacle dress shall be tnelosed by a 6 foot high masonry wo 11 with view ens VUcung gate-, 5arvan[ to City standards. Location Sha ll be p subject to arpfoial P, I., Planning DIals.on. V X 6. forarevievlandeappra,al material poe too l suanceEoflbuilding permits. in9 Di vls loco o g X 2. All r.af appurtenance, deluding a r I.aditiamell. shall be architecturally -- snlegnt:d, shielded fnnn view and Inc sound buffared frown adjacent Properties and streets as required by the Plaiultnq and ]mlJmg Divisions. X 9. Prior to any use of ¢a pro ece site or business activity being cam¢nced vv`ean, all <]nJinoi, If .l; Prdv.11 molalnud herein and 11 be Co..,IC,ad to tl.e satisfactaen ar W. Gi -¢btr of Cu.- ,-pity DeualoPaent. 9. 11111 approval Shall b<c Cie mill A.A IOld If building Permits 11 not issued for this project within one zear Lass the data of project approval. 1D. As a Conditional Ilse r.n 't. thl, Wolect snail becmu hall and void in eiyhntn (101 mnitls Inn .:ate of approval, unless permrts are issued or use appmvel Is X 11. A or"Jed )lgnling pla.i snail be sulm.t« d t0 and approved by the Planning oiv aion prior to I of huildm s g poi its. Such plan shall Indscale style. Ill..nu.a..... S•G cots m, ncig.l v..1 ,••thud of shielding. No lighting shill adle'sely aff<ct aJJ... tut p-p.rt.es. 6. 12. ALL s rwtwmin, Pals- Costal led at the Line of initial development shall be 1]. J..turited pedestrian Pathways across Circulation aisles shall be provided i t of 0 u.lhnut lle develp} r1L LO connect d. 'I lings with open spaces and ricrealimhal Ylet. Project 110. Ie. All trash pick op shall be for Individual Units with all receptacles shielded from public view. Ir no centralized trash re<epuam are provided. 15. Standard False cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Oulldip9 Official Friar to occupancy of the first unit. K16. All building's numbers and Individual units shall be identified In a clear and concise manner, including proper 111— Inatton. X 11. So 16 Core exterior doors, security bead balks and locks shall be Installed an each unit In this project. _.X' Is- Semurlty devices such as wihishi locks shall be smtalled on each unit. 19. All un RS within this davelopnent shall be p1dI. n1d to be adapted for a - solar water luau., unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances + required to he incorporated into this project to include such things are but not limited to reduced Con sump[EOn shaver heads, better grade of Avabstia.. double paned windows. extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating Unit. 22. Emergenty second. ry access Shan be provided to this tract to the satis- faction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. local and Paster Planned Equestrian Trails Shall be provided throughmlt the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan. A detailed equestrian bail plan indicating ,r14thi, m a aimum ilol'es. Physical tanJitiont. 'In,"" and weed control, in accordance with City equestrian trail stan,lards. shall be ,.'allied to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation pf the final map. 2E. This tract shalt form or a.,a to a mmtenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. 25. Street naves shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, In accordance .Rh the adopted Street Naming Policy, prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 26. If this development. Intends to restrict equestrian or animal related uses to 11111fic late or prohibit then +nu rely, then a COP, of IAd C.C. A Ill.'s most he vureitied to and reviewed by tl¢ City Planner prior to approval or final amp. X 27. This p,.I,Ct shall pro"" 15b-1•eP TIKU affordable housing and /or ems, i n Confnrman<e vLLn �mral Plan rousing Follows and the busing nterladefinea In the growth ^ .d,,O ht O,Jm.mce. Affordabslilr shall he determined by current narkel tales. rents and r:edian inCa,.e 1,1111 at the tine of construction of tie Project. An agreement to such shall be approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building pdnnils. -Parking t Vehicular ACC051 X 1. A11 parking lot landscaped Islands stall have a mini.mxe Outside dive nsion or S' and Shall contain an 19' walk adjacent to yanking stall. X 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minima 15 gall,. site. • • x ). All I.o-woy +Isle widths Shall be A 'in' shark of 26 feel wide. a. luerge•rty saes s dull ,, .ni,irld, naintdwn<e Ire. "a cis r, a ndn vuin el Za feet .rd, al all flues dunng conslructlon In accordance wan Foothill fire Cn[.IG r, ryrru .•n s. X_ S. All parking spaces shall he delete striped. 6. All units shall be pro.rded with aulbriti, ga't'e door openers. x_ 2- oesigwlei .['liar parking -"a' shall be turf blocked. .� 6. The Cv. man u, caws and Cestrictie.S ,all rest net tn< s[D rage oI rec redb owl vein Cles an rtln arts un,c,s v:,y are lee pr:n ipia sour. pf tnnsparla UOn ter lee ..ne 9. 'b parsing shall be permi;taJ within the interior circulation aisle other than In designs led visitor parking Jred,. Carensnll. Code,, and Re,tnetinns 0•v ss ran pnora[alr ssuen' iilb lid and s R[ed Ic Ind City Planning soy ad pe r.nl I. C. Lehdsvar+ "^ X I. A drtasled landscape and t rigali,w plan shall ae sudnitted [ by the his In, Division prior to C[e ism m 9 peance of build v and epprorea ,its. 2. C.lsnng tiers shall be rvtdirm wherever Possible. A natter plan or •es n,.g lr, rs s nvg I" preuse laralmn, li d r and type zln,n he ca.p ie o:J Ly it's :,,e rarer. Said plan shall fate Into a"oer, the proposed 'raainl. w • ire c: a n I rata reed, trimmnf metnw,, acid wIele n b i.as .rn app. "ar:oar in, renta<orwnt of renro.ea trees. To,, pion is m.;v lied to bar• ,ul.nlrld to and alUraaed by the Planning Divtlton prior to apprpwl of the final grading plan. V X 1 Street trees, a mnWe of 15 gallon six, or l.rgdr, shall be installed in Uj arcordm[e with ;le ."I'll plan o s[rtt[ trees for the City of Rsncho <vc.rnngr a hill Ee Vl.m[ea at ra average of r ery 30' on in[ermr streets are 2d' on ea WrIo, streets. a a, A nrmrmen of 50 treat per g,.,S ¢r e, COmPrisea of the following sites, mall M proviaeJ "thin tee develoPnent'. 20: -24• hat or larger, 90 15 oalic ^, and O -. 5 9•Ildn. �L S. All landscaped areas stall he nelntained in a healthy and thriving con - diOOn, free from waea., tea ;n, and debris. _x 6. All slope banks in dates or rive (6) feet In vertical height and of S-I or gird ter Slope shah he lanmdaea ana Irrigated 1. accordance with snipe DLn;sng rcgmm-...It' pl VI City al 0.rMM (Ucammrga. Such slope pl3nttng s all include Eut net be "bei "d to rooted gfom.d c r and a,,roprutd roes a.A tr:e,. ,ql "ch planting ana 11111•[loo shall he Cnotlnupusl, rnt.tuica , a t,V 1laY ana loin... Cuneltrnn by the developer until 1111h r n, �v ,al amt t, told aM o red P Me huyv, Prior to relarb,b, n/ n,,,planning y 9ta /into sJeterwme t�a[ntof to, Slopes .hall be c.,ple:ed rs In satrsla Ctnry a,ol.rido. X T.- Alt pa lsYS. So- areas, and landscaping shall be lull, wamWlnea by a kloo oora a:acutJpn or ovrer r, ans acaxptable to the Ctly. Snch prop! Of a <mtenuncn shalt he Sobliltea't0 the City Prior to Ilivance of building pvfmrt,. S. the trier Yard bna¢ip cog, and an appropriate fell g9at inn sYStm, Shot] he i ^Stalled by the de idper In aS,.,Unce with salmi reed plans. PD 81 *111926) 0 9. The final design of the perfecter Parkwys, walls, landscup ing and lid'. walks Shall to lneluded in the r oUl ma land sail' Dans and mall 4e suNirCl to approval by the Planning Olvls•on. x, 10. A rain immn or 2D z or the trees planted "thin lee "Plies. .rail he y spec I. Sl 11. SpdClal landscape features Sech is beending, +Iluvlil reek, SpeCie,o star trees, nm.ld .... 9 stdevalka (be [n vertical and horlmntal <haligel an, Inlensirted LrWScaprng, is required along __ 0. Slnns _- I. Any signs Proposed for this der"I.P.ea shall be designwl In con fern.... th the Culprebe., ire Slgo Ord,.oe,e and shall Idea arc rev few and approa, I by the "anning Division per., to Inslalla t too Or sUch Sign,. 2. A nnilarm 011. prS,r,, for this dmelorynent 'bill 01 snAnttted to the PlUening Di.rsldn for their review and approval prior to h'wnce of 0uliding Permits. _ 0. The sign' indicated On the Idleitted oil., re not approved with this approval nil will "O's 'roan [e s earl cw and'W.Ial. pddl [tonal A rivals g' e0 1. ne I"Palent Reeler, snarl be acca*nitshed prior to the 1,.Uere of a DUlldtng perry l t. 2. DeveloPSent Pevire, 'lull be +<carp lished prior t0 recordation or tM final so M lv6 ion map. _.� J. Appr 1 f Te t lve T act de, 1 Bs an 'obJlct to the approval Pr 4�lanne3 '�evefoQmen�— r�i- _U9____ a. This Cond. banal Use Permit Is granted for a period at r,heI ch tide the planning CU —isr ion mar add or delete mnTttans two revoke ke [ne Lanai ti anal Use Pe".1t. o'e 6. The developer Is required to obtain [be following '(geed std tein•nt by pncna sees of Mnes which have a prtvd ee or puL1 iC pyu a[r un Vatl on Or adjacent to their property. In Porchasing the Mme looted on lot Tract under [and [F.af saitldo[ I have read ue C.C, 6 T. -and eassnent for lee is subject to a mutual reciprocal gain access. PUIPOSe oild.inq end,,lash traffic [o Signed Part M1a see Said SWlbabot Is to be filed by the developer with the City prior t0 oc CUpan". x 6. prior to Appeov+l and r... rda PO.l of the llml map, or pricer to Issaan[e Of d.i ld ing moo U,,, when he solid... Sion pup Is Involved, wilt ten [deb lru lido born all alf[e led 5,WUl Oix iris s, shall be solos ltN to ins ...... rt dent o! we�unanity Devclosnmt wmen zatr, oral adegaate school pnliues err, no vat be edPlbl, of aecor.wdating students Il nerated be his pray.ti. Svch letter of e'tlfiwbnn nil's have Or,m is•urg by till 50.npl 0.". ct walan vat, (60) Jays prior 10 the rlwt noes apVrdral in the faze Or the Iuh- dlvislon yp or IssllJnce of gernlltl t the Case of all .[her es ldf nt lal Plole<ts. F. v G. X ). Prior to aporoval and li Cafdate. of the final no P, or Friar to the b'ua ice of lrct to.o, fer.ni IS .Len n rp is in'.o lveJ, wr q(en eer t if ical inn it I,. tu, ell fr .allJn 1.410 s , a ',equate 41 .. r a-' ulcer floll1lie, are or In`f.uo-. +n of p. .- S"o, fly t_n oPO «•J I•rnjecl. IUII Le .utwl 1teJ to the ll.c niter J r :t.r[[awrtnrn t Ill. S. tt lette. mm't have heir ",.,d by the Case of au4 •'y Inn) JaaS Pn or [a final nub aut.tval it 11'n i•on or 1 Valor, If I•r'.t li in the tote Of all o".." rnbal pr 1j 11. Par rt+iec to uvua S..p C 'ant 1u 111 tl es allevnple h, ne Saia All R..j. oral t.r [.f Cont. al Oai,S u—J toe Cat'. ref l of, cat tan of accrp:abo l 10 . Inc I-J 111 all '.0 porttve ,nforvat,On. Shell I< OOtatnuJ and tut to tor' Ctti. X S. This approval shall baea.e mull and void If the tonmtive .Ldiv"ion Imp h not a.:ry oval and r anl a .•J :ullo n:g beam wid .1.v. n o3 Invo L.J. roll In F.,Ivn II2I 'an tls La t yal nr 'NS prolec[ unless an !n ([ntiprr nos t..•u .;ran[N Li too ila nn ong C. In itt ion. 9. This AAliul'on wa not SI''Ii,,IJ as a total 4e,olopo.ent Ilia.9e and is "Pew ireJ In napvlys fur a 1141,,! 11tn.9 reL bus . the d•s iq.. solltm. of Inn Cro.rth :' nai.n..1 tm a cria. !a (Ina, acpro,al and recorJati on of [ne map if me uoaiultac trig m be de r aped AS tract hW,s. APPLICANT SNAIL CONCACI THE "IlD _t C. 9I'l: S fllN FOR CONJL IIL'.[E 411N THE FOLIV.lIIIG CabNIT WIS: L[e peve�nt x 1. Toe applicant 'Poll Comply w10 the later[ adopted Lnl /vm Building Code. Uniform H`o :mseal Cane. Clnf.,nn PI`.1bmp Co_', Illtiorutl Electric Code, and all a,Ne, app lie aolP urul.,ancaS a /refit ae tpne of i of relabre permits. In t too sivanu X 2. Prior to lssuance of bu.ldm, permits for carSustible cans[ructian• evidence shall to Sutnit[ed to tie Faoth,ll District Fire Chief that temporary va[er Saw, for ra.e pro[eeuan IS ova ilaale, pending cpnple[1ar. of rellm rid fire protection systams. X 3. Prior to the iizmnCe or a Wilding Pormit far a new residential d- ,Iling m t(s) or naio, aJiitacn [o an e'u l.., um one applicant Small pay de lo,ent lees at tb, cigtl ltl.r] rate. Such it's may ivbule• but nut e, Tonises [a: City 0,..:.C¢... oat C,,. Vain Fee. Orat.1, Fee. System, 0.'rtlupun[ Fee. Gnnit and :Ln Coe. ..ing ice,, and Scheel Fees. A. Prior to the ISS.ance or a u.Lrng oe ni: mr a ne cormercial or Industrial deaelo'LM1 at feeidj,t.,n to m hissing oriel op'.ent, ,the applicant shall pay develo tsbli;,,j rile. Such fees coy include, but no[ to landed t.,: Systems Ot v el :peen[ Fee, Drainage fee. Pema tt and plan O,ck mg Fees. 5. Street addresses 'hall Le brovbed by VIA build,,,, Ofit ua 1. 6. eaell tog units Shall Le wn.o`ured -i lh fin retardant material and non 'A tus[Ible r,I' 111e vial. I. All torn.' d.n•Ilinps saall hive the Wilding elevation facing the street -PI'ad'd with ald,bonnl ,,o-d trim around w dS.t and wod 'ding or plant. on[ -LI,, a: p......... p N[in Svuc W r- _s 1. Parma, Cott iJn[e with tae Vm form 0.[Id ing Cade for properly Iine clear..... Considering u.e, aria amid (ire vex i'[1rer.1!'.S of misting build .ngt. 2. u,stln9 bulldanglsi shall be node to cm.ply .,in lmr,,ol nu,ldio, and 3-11-9 eagulabnns for t:e mle.0 Yd u.. nr I',' tuilamg .hall b, Aenol Hhed. 3. t"ItIng se..a9e dr5POW1 faclillae, shall be ren-ved, f111e.1 . ... l! -r Capped to�Jy -it N the Cmlmm Plu:Sieg Ud,. and Bn.fam Wilding Cede. PO 81- �,8dei1).�28) N. Grading _X_ I. Grading of the subject properly shall be in accordance with the Vniforn Wilding Cede, City Grading Standards and a[ceP 4d grading yrn<[iC e:. the (mail grading Plan sMll be in supatanU at conformance with lLe apprpred 'iuo"Ediil grid J ing plan. X 2. A sells report ',.all be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to Perform such work. d 3. A geological report shall be Prepared Ly qualified engineer or geologist and so Witted at the tine of application for 9,,Julg plan chec t. a. The final grading plan shall Le SuIj .. to review and aePmvel by In, Grading Cucmlttee and shall to morol a Led prior to r N aIdltmn .1 o final suodirivou map or issuance of building Permit nhiclr.ver comrs first. _ 5. AS A Custan -IOt subdivision, the following ligiireemis snail be vet: A. of all ona51 be pilled and an agreement executed, 9mranteein9 cmv .. Ite drainage ficilitles n dry for dfu Coring all par to the 'it f s fac t won of Ne Building and SSafety Oirl Sion. b. Appropriate easepenta, for sate disposal of drainage water that are Conducted a recorded to the satisfaction of the t L Building andSafety31 vlsiona C. on -site drainage Improvements, necessary far dewat,ring or protecting the subdivided Properties, are to be installed prior to Isivabca• of Wilding permits for construction upon any parcel that may be Subject lo. or contributes to, drainage fl oas entering, leaving or within a parcel relative to which A Lualdi n9 permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be su,oi,led to the Building ,rd safety 0(vision for approval prior to i s Suanc, of building perm ts. (Tn is may be on an incremental a' Cm.pofile basb.) A. All slope parks In Qc"S of it" (5) feet in verticll height and of S:1 or greater slope shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or Sara other alternative me bed of erasion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Om lJ ing Off i<ial. Imatiya lion Shall 're Provided to Y,,,.A I. Ne Seto upd Ina iii in growth IP a in[ 6 months after 9ennina [ton. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING 0171510:1 FOR CSMPLIANCE WITH THE Ffttbhlo; -� CONDIila;6: I. kdicallon_dWt icular Accni Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street I,ht,- of -imy and 011 necessary [a i<menls ai Show 06 [Ile tentative map. X 2. O,diwtion 'ball be do of the following nghb -oPvay on the Following street`, Easterly 30' of 3 additional feet on — Ahl arld Avenue addllio". feet on additional feet on _ - - - -_ L Corner property line maim -111 Le required per City standards. a. Ali rights of rehiWlar Ingress to and egress from 'bill be dedicated at }Li lows: Reciprocal easevente shall be PrOl Id Id ensuring ucesS to all parcels Over private roads• drives, or pa rk vN are. s. and Shell be noticed on the nap Or Shall be retprded Ca ncu M1ent wi ttr floc nap. w 1.•e ..... ......tons mall ee made for the Ingress, egress and Internal cYrculatacn of any, ty.czt which will be used for delivery of gbads to the .no. rrty .r ih the 111111.ap .1 the 91cp.led bu11ne1.. y. private drama:- else.-Its for trots -lot drainage %hali be required —a a,all to aalm,red or naliced on the final map. X6. All a acting ea], ants lying within future right -cf -way are to be on t tit la 4ed or to be del arw;cd on Vr map per Ctty Engineer's rental reeents. e. Easements for S,bi.alk for pile usta &hall be dedicates to the City nnere o,2,r [Eroegh Dnrato properly. ). 1t reel Impro_ots _ I- fonst•,.ct full street .npmvenentl including. bat not limited to, orb and garter. L.C. p„erent, sidenaik. drive approaches, :a rka,ay trees and .Veal Iphu on all Teleran, Slit -e11. 2. A niniaum of 26 -foot wide wvament within a 10 -foot wide dedicated nght-or -way .Fall on cans wc[ea for an helr-]ectien streets. X 3. C.......L [be following missing Improvements including• but not m teJ o: , ,V^` (i rll5 a.(. 519*- Daf9E P ^•DtJFt Si REEi h:,::E LI li:9 p!'i. :. :.Pod. 1If 115 O':EPLAY ISLM1 ^0 ON[P H iyhland;_X_ x x� X X X •Include$ landscap -3 and 1 ri,tlan on meter. X A, prior to any work being performed In the public right -of -way. fees hall Le coed and a a:l. yen[ perm iC .hall be obtained from Cne e rty E +glrecr'1 office's In addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street iTproveren; plant approved by the City Engineer and P11P..ed by it a.grtlerrd Ov11 r .ball be rnqulred, for all . f Stre^tal in VrO rk "gi n[t. e... to • - - e cf an en cr a. Fire Of perch. plane and F•3111's ahatiShow the location of all existing utility facilat, within the ri yrt -Cie -way. X 6. Suitt, snail ee pnit,d and an agreement uecuted to the to titfactlon of tae (it, Login. rr and the City Attorney, 9narantefing crllotipn Of Vr V.bl¢ i rule, pficr to r c ardivg of Um map or the ..soon -e or lurldin9 perni[s. wiiietever coves first. X , All street iv rovementl Shall be installed to the Satisfaction of the — City C.Si ... r, prior to Cite avant.. X 6, payer >nt striping. mo king, traffic and Street name signing thall be InitalicJ per the regairehentz or the City Engineer. 9. f+rtt mg uty rind requiring r onstruaion stall remaan upon for ,,Of L< as all .,, with adequate detours Nnmg cons truce ion. A Cain cn'u vt S1.11 be renmrod to c r the I.,, of 9rad.ml and , tau,, . i,, ]t aAt 4e ref.,,d en cnpletion of the tons list man Co Sit tauslacllan or to City Engineer. • PD B1 -08 11,928) It X 10. Walkway, still be provided between public sidewalks mod gn-slte pedestrian areas. X 11. concentrated drainage flaws shall ul cross sl denlAl. Under tlaeualk- drains shall be installed to city 1tanlardl. 12. An energy dissipator and /or erosion control measures thrall he Installed to the satisfaction OF the City D,gim eq at the end or Stub Sheets. A letter of ac eptance of dramagm runoff Irow the Jown urwm p,a,1ty owners shall be required. K. 0rdinane and Flood Control X I. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all on -site it .unage facilities repunet .r the City Engineer. _ 2. intersection drains rill be ,coined at the Following lout)ono 4 Y, 3. She proposed project falls within a t indicated a s 4.01111 to flooding under the national Flood Insurance pmgramand Is subject to the provisions of that program and City Ordinance flu. 24. x e. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street, or to a stone drain. _ S. Adequate provisions shall he made for acceptance and dispasal of surface drainage entering the properly from adjacent areas. _ 6. letter or acceptance frnn dmmatrsam property turners shall he required where rumff from 11 tract flows onto pr TVata or.... ties. 2. shall he deeigned as major water carrying slre[ls ream rang a Comb' wtlon of ipeclal curb noilhit , Iham rCial type d'IVe approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landleaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. �.8. The following storm drain shall be fns Oiled la the 1aHSpcllan df the City Engineer _HeSQg�Bff Y£T�AYI Channel t,er attached 9. prior in rece'datich of the map, A broad - scale nydrol ogic and drain... study for the project dull be submitted to the City Engineer for n view. Utitilbt _Y 1. provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water. electric power, gas, telephone and IM, television Coaddit. 2. An utilities within the Pfject shall be Installed unavground Including utilities along mi arterials less till 12 KV. 3. utility eaummrils shall be provided to the specirg,IJ,, of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. _X a. Developer still be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. S. Developer shall W responsible for it' Installation or $vest lighting in accordance with Southern (ah fornia Edison Company and City sOndayW ds. _—X 6. Water aod seer plans shall he designed and constructed to nee[ Us ter Di s f ucaD", c, opj ..ruLv vnnsCe[alynealeh DepanlmenldofRth. U.", et $an deta,ra. A leaer of to "I iance Gen M,D .II1 he read i. cd PI ar wMaban. X g. 1.;., ais nnrn not heeh s,Cu,,d from all uill ill's and other Interested •irnues teas a,'eu. Approeal of led final men .ill •v+sro�rna ,.at mr ro .e.e..ed on ,oh. s.ea rce to .�•. R Lne__�1 eegni .nl s_nnJ n)pra.a is I. Dann its f.— other acv 11pc will he recalled as fall..; A. bilwal for B. Com;r Cos[ A:.a e[ Ta�raa Or rod [a ry yu�n e� n -�- •aiml C. San &rn,vaina [aunty flood [antral Ois[ntt _ p. 41n, r: x I. A copy of [n' [ovenants, CondItlons and Restrictions (C.C. 8 R.'s) and Arucl.; of Infor wre[icn of t a Ilamaq.nerl Association. suyj zet to ;he ap .al of ill [i[y Attorney, dul and a ml .e recorJN uiN this nap cy'✓rovic, to the City. X 3. final .arcel and tract maps .hall conform [o o[[JUs. city s[aneards one p, re 4. A parcel cap Stall he recorded pnor p, first on... mEdlvision to Pleven[ creac,po of unr i:ea wrces. x s. I>a ^Of 1. ,n and leqi[mg Ogle of Mention beafiled`.d[na rdl., Jet, nunc n. R.a ang ic.an ng costs involved in District F.rmatton ,.all he Lorne by Ue tl..eiaytr. S. All perireser landfeapsd pa,k.ay, are rcyulled to he annexed thin the vm l'oo :cave : a,nlnnance diso-ic[. V _ __X A. Landsca ping and Irrigation systems required to he installed . hiblic r an l'o' pvr rater of this tract area sell, he continuously �e a by Ile am il[I_r until accepted by 'he City and anni,ad Lnt„[ that an ld.cupa a n nanC2 ail [,.it. • PO 81 -08 (TT 11928) Drapal 110. 10 • l J • C STAFF REPORT October 14, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner G c z / f a Cli Fi. 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -08 TT 11928] - SHAFFER/WESTLAND VENTURE - A change of zone from R- 1- 10,000 to R -3 /PD for a total planned residential development of 67 condominium units on 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -32 ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted development plans and a tentative tract map for the above - described project in order to gain consideration for approval by the Planning Commission. The approval of this project will necessitate the approval of four (4) integral parts of the project; a Negative Declaration for the environmental assessment, the rezoning of the site from R -1- 10,000 (single family residential /10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size zone) to R -3 /PD (multiple family residential /Planned Development zone), the site plan, building design, tentative tract map. The project has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Committees and,as presented,has success- fully passed the Residential Assessment System. A detailed Staff Report with related Resolutions and Conditions of Approval has been prepared for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicants, Shaffer 8 Sons and Westland Venture Company, hdve requested approval of their proposal in order to develop 67 condominium units on 5.85 acres of land, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, approximately 800 feet east of Archibald Avenue (Exhibit B). The site is currenity developed with 2 single family homes and contains an abandoned water storage tank. These are to be removed. (Ezhii)it °C "). A natural grade sepdration of 10 -20 feet runs in an approx,.:.ate north to south direction through the property, and the site has a slope of about 20 feet from the north to the south. 'Vege- tation consists of turf and several large trees. Surrounding land uses are varied. The Alta Loma Channel runs along the eastern property line. A 45 foot wide easement, owned by the Atchison /Topeka and Santa Fe Rail- road, separates this property from other properties to the north. The easement is not used by the railroad. A chicken ranch is presently 7 ITEM G Staff Report • PD 81 -08 (TT 11928) -2- October 14, 1981 located on the property north of the railroad right -of -way. There are two single family residences located on the south side of Highland Ave. Foothill Communities Chruch of the Nazarene owns the large parcel im- mediately east of this project and has built their church on a portion of it. Tentative Tract No. 11869 (Item "F" on this Agenda), is located on the property adjacent to the west. The General Plan for this site is for medium density (4 -14 dwelling units per acre; residential develop- ment. The density proposed for the project is approximately 12 units per acre. ANALYSIS: The project has been developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act, as well as, the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan. Setbacks, building separation, height, parking, and open space requirements have been compiled with (Exhibit "D "). Attached two -story townhouses of 4 or 5 units per building have been pro- posed. The units have either 2 or 3 bedrooms and range from 1,290 to 1,600 sq. ft. in size. Each unit has an attached two -car garage. Eighteen guest parking spaces have been provided throughout the site. Texturized pedes- trian crosswalks and curvilinear walkways have been provided in order to form a continuous pedestrian system. Recreation facilities include a pool, • spa, deck area, recreation room, open recreation area, and tot lot. They are located towards the center of the project. Access to the development is provided via Highland Avenue. The required right -of -way width for Highland is 66 feet. Full street improvements will be provided along Highland, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement and overlay, meandering sidewalks, drive approach, street lights and landscaped parkways. The interior road system is a single -loop private drive, which meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordinance, and will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. A second access point for emergency purposes will be required as a condition of approval to be constructed to Fire District standards. The Preliminary Grading Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and has been given conceptual approval, conditional to provisions being made for accepting the water flowing onto the property from the north and west ( Exhibit "E "). The property will drain south and east into the Alta Loma Channel. The applicants will improve the Channel to ultimate carrying capacity. This improvement is necessary in order to meet the point threshold of the Residential Assessment System. The grading of the site will eliminate most of the natural grade separation and necessitate the removal of the existing trees. L] _7 • Staff Report PD 81 -08 (TT 11928) -3- October 14, 1981 The Conceptual Landscpaing Plans indicate landscaping throughout the site (Exhibit "F ";. A landscaped traffic circle with a fountain will serve as the focal point for the entrance of this project. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan indicating all proposed planting material in accordance with the standards and policies set by the Planning Commission shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The Design Review Committee has reviewed this project and found it to be an appropriate sytle for the proposed site (Exhibits "G ", "H ", and "I "). Detailed colored renderings and site plans and a building materials sample board have been prepared and will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the applicant.has been attached for your review. The study discusses various environmental factors, relative to the project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and included it in the Tentative Tract file. No adverse impacts on the environment due to this project have been found. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation of a Negative Declaration would be • appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in a local newspaper of general circulation as a public hearing item, and notices have been mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 feet. To date no correspondence either for or against this project has been received. RECOXMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Cormiission concurs with the findings of the Staff, adoption of the attached Res ql utions with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, „U;. JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:AT:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tentative Tract Map, Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map, Exhibit "C" - Natural Features Map, Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "E" - Con- ceptual Grading and Drainage Plan, Exhibit "F" - Con- ceptual Landscaping Plan, Exhibits "G ", "H', 8 "I" - Architectural Elevations, Initial Study Part 1, and Resolution with Conditions of Approval 7G ( § ; § | »• \ ! �,� /� � • ' � !] •® „ J ! ± !a q ? &! f Jr, ! MU4 fill / r-� N m, � CM, OF , I�,wQ �,a.�nPA- RANCH CEC %20&(; TITLE: JL e ie « n , PLANNING DIVISION eu :mss m ?0 . \ .K, V r-� N m, � CM, OF , I�,wQ �,a.�nPA- RANCH CEC %20&(; TITLE: JL e ie « n , PLANNING DIVISION eu :mss m ?0 . 0 U W12 T A-12 T A112 T I RMT A112-T I i -T RIOT �l ;PROJECT SITE RIIDT .5-T I nissT SITE UTILIZATION I'AAR �.� CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONG., k VIANNING DIVISION HIGHLAND 21 -1VILLA22i'' I:XI IMIT, c� INORTI I I Wp-rrc A. AL, CITY OF R A.NCI 10 CUCAN ION'GA PLANNING DIVISION LXI [INT: 0 S-C-A LF: , . i • • z!E:: SITE PLAN PROJECT SUMMARY LAND USE: RESIVENTIAL-MEMA 494 MAC TRASH ENCLOSURES: 0 WIT TYPES. A: USO S F. 2M4 E • � 3, F IM' B : 1600 , R38D'F-1310S,P.ZUD' C 1480 S. F. 2811'6- UOO S, F. 2 W' VICIMTY MAP rum TZ �HGITILADJD -'IVILLASF TRA:T VIMB NORTI I CITY OF colt G'S RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 0 CITY OF RANCH) CUCAMONGA ITEM: �� NIORTI I 0 0 is c LANDSCAPE CITY U, CIIO CUC: \,NIO. \'( " -1 PLANNING DIVISION t i I EN11MIT F SCALD 5 ,NOkTI I C • i FRONT ELEVATION - FIVE UNIT BUILDING REAR ELEVATION - FIVE UNIT BUILDING !IT.- HLAPJD '''`I I LASr- NORM I CITY OF 1'1,.\NNI,\G DIVISKYN' P_XI 1111 r G sc.u.l> 1�7,1� E lu VANTIAL GROUND FLOOR PLAN CITY OA'' RANCI 110 CUC IN lax(;"1 PLANNING DIVISIOX Y7 HIGHLAND iVILLASI,-'- I NORTI I END ELEVATIONS VANTIAL GROUND FLOOR PLAN CITY OA'' RANCI 110 CUC IN lax(;"1 PLANNING DIVISIOX Y7 HIGHLAND iVILLASI,-'- I NORTI I SOUTP ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION "S NoniH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION RANCHO cucG\,Njox(;,.\ PLANNING 17P 1 (74- FLOOR PLAN e� RECREATION BUILDING HIGHLAND =' INORTI I • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCTd10NGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To he completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects recuirina environmental review, this form most be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Ce:cmi" ee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) drys before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no envircnmer.tal impact; and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning • the proposed project. u PROJECT TITLE: Hyland Villas APPLICANT'S NAidE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Shaffer R Sons Lie 0137 La Grande Ave. Ranrho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 957 -1 -156 - Wantland VPnfnre Cmmianv. 115? N. Mountain Ave.. Suite 104 ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED COFCEiU: it:G TilIS PROJECT: Tnomas J. Davis - Architect Rt "H.' al R,nrt, ,, r.,. +- ,n "C.. 9S;- IA Ci,1'IO:: OF PFC.iECT (ST =-- ADDRESS AN-) ASSESSOR P.4 i(C'I. ro.) TI�' -Cl Av.'_ A P !f 201 7.52 3? — LIST OT;I n PEF�ITTS NrCFGST,R'i PROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE. AND F.r.DERAL AGC:;CI::S Ai;D T!!E AGENCY ISSUING SUCII PERMITS; City Buildinc Permit T -( �' Cf P ?O,7EC'? DESCRIPTION • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Siu.ty: Seven condominium units with attached two car aaraees with a Spanish /Mediterranean flavor. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EY.ISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Lot area = 5.85 acres 2 existing houses to be removed = 3800 S. F. = first floor areaof new = 43.250 S. F. total floor area = 96,410 S. F. DESCnT_ °E THE FN"TPO''7Z :7.AL SET ?I`IG OF THE PROJECT SITE It:CL;'D I:7J Itit'OP :4T2O7: C2: TOPOG3IPHY, P:z, ::IS (TREES) , ANI'J,LS, ANY CULTU =.'.L, HISTORICAL OR SCE`iIC ASPECTS, USE OF S": ^- (".`NDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTI ::G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): `rl•o ; 95 acre =ite is located aonroximately 800 feet east of Archibald A.c.. on the north side of Hiahland Ave. , currently there are two house =. garage and an abandoned storage tank located on the prop eity Tne site has a slope of about 20' from north to south_ ve aetauon consif n: several medium size trees and several large eucalyptus. There are 1r, tht rrojoct, pare of a lar•ier project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although inclividvally small, tray a;; a ul")1,2 have siyg ificant em•irot.,ental impact? No I\ U z- 2 Ll C C WILL. V;1 PR0,711CT: YES CO • X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? L _X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? _ X _ 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 6 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla=ables or explosives? Explanation of an YES answers above: Several trees located en the east part of [he site will have to be removed due to earth fill in this area. IM MIIT'.7Te If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the nest page. CcP.TIPIC,4TIQN: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits prevent the data and infornntion recuired for this initial evaluation to the bee +t of ray nbiliLy, and not, the fact r., statements, and i.nfcrr,.ti.on prnr'cnted are true and correct to the best of ry kno,rl ^dgo an-! belief. I further understand that additional infnrmaticn may ho recuired to be submitted hc`c.c .n P'Jcquate evauuation can be made by the Dovrlorrnont Reviu�, Cor..mi.Ltce. Date �9 Sigr.a Lure • L� Title fAZt 1?Te4�7- x ��r PESIMO ;TIAL CO):STRUCTT_O'1 • The following, infcr.otion should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing, the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Shaffer & Sons Inc., TN -11928 Specific Location of Project: %,,,l, .:An of Hi4,,'pla nrl At, Ann' + of Archibald Ave. PHASP I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PII. :SE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: p 2. Number of ruiltivle family units: 67 3. Date proposed to . begin construction: 1982 4. Earlicst date o'_ occ.: m :c 1982 14odr1 - and " of Tentative Number of 3 Bd. = 18 = 267o S. Bedrooms price Rand " " 2 Bd. = 40 =6040 No. " 1 Bd. = 9 = 145 .p_' 05 200 15 • n_I 103. 000 6 C -2 91.200 3 D -3 103.000 6 r -1 83. 900 v F -2 84, 900 8 G -2 92,600 14 H -3 95,700 6 0 L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 18, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -05 - TENTATIVE TRACT 9369/11173) - BROCK - A change of zone from R -3 Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential) for a total planned development of 117 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202- 181 -23 and 24. ABSTRACT: The proposal before the Council tonight is for a total planned development of 117 zero lot line patio homes on 18.2 acres of land. In order to approve the proposal, City Council will need to approve the Zone Change from R -3 to R -3 /PO and to issue a Nega- tive Declaration. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of October 14, 1981, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above- described project and approved the related Tract Map with Conditions as attached and recommended approval of a Negative Decla- ration and Change of Zone. e 1977 Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report of October 14, 1981, which fully describes the project. The project, as proposed, is consistent with all related City Ordinances and plans. The proposed density of 6.42 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre). No adverse environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. To date, one correspondence has been received in favor of the pro- posed project, :chile none have been received against it. Opposition was voiced against tiie project concerning the placement of two -story structures behind the existing homes on London Avenue. In response to this concern, the Planning Commission required that the final Placement of units along the east project boundary be subject to Design Review to eliminate adverse views. PD 91 -05 - Brock City Council Agenda November 18, 1981 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City ouncii approve Planned Development Zone Designation No. 81 -05 for the above - described project through adoption of the attached Ordinance. Respectful y u mitted, I I JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development • Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of October 14, 1981 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval City Council Ordinance Correspondence from Property Owner • • X14 0 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 14, 1981 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -05 TT 9369 and 11173 - BROCK - A change o zone from R -3 to R -3 /PD for a total planned development of 117 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 181 -23 8 24 ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted development plans and two tract maps for the above - described project in order to gain consideration and approval by the Planning Commission. Approval of this project will neces- sitate the approval of four integral parts of the project; a Negative Declaration for environmental assessment, the rezoning of the site from R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) zone, the Site Plan and building design, and the Tentative Tract Maps. The project has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Committees and has passed the residential assessment system. Staff has prepared a detailed Staff Report, related Resolutions, and Conditions of Approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant, M.J. Brock 8 Sons, Incorporated, is requesting approval on their proposal in order to develop 117 patio homes on 18.2 ac. of land located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Ave. (Exhibits A 8 B). The application is for a Planned Development with a density of 6.42 dwelling units per acre. The project site is in the R -3 zone and General Planned for Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre). The project site is presently vacant, undeveloped, and contains little vegetation. The Planning Commission has previously approved projects for both of these tracts which consisted of a total of 114 condominium units as shown on Exhibit C. Approval of this project will make the previous approvals null and void. ANALYSIS: The project, as shown on the attached Development Plans, is consistent with the General Plan since it falls within the density range designated. in addition, the proposed style of housing and subdivision is consistent with the R -3 zone. Surrounding land uses and zoning is described as follows: Item H Staff Report PD 81 -05 (TT 11173) North South East West LAND USE Commercial Shopping Center Vacant, with approved Multi - Family project (TT 11608) Single Family Residential Single Family Residential C October 14, 1981 • ZONING C -1 R -3 R -1 R -1 & R -3 The project is being developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan. All set- backs, building separations, parking, and open space requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have been complied with. The majority of the proposed structures are detached zero lot line single family structures. Sixteen of the units are duplexes attached by a common wall along the lot line (Exhibit D). As can be seen from the Site Plan, the front yard setbacks vary from 6' to approximately 35'. All units include a two -car attached garage. Where driveways are less then 20' automatic garage door openers will be required. Seventy -one additional guest parking spaces are provided throughout the development as shown on Exhibit E. Fifty -nine spaces are provided through- out the street while twelve spaces are provided adjacent to the recreation center. Texturized pedestrian crosswalks will be provided on site in order to form a continuous pedestrian system. Recreation facilities including pool and an active play area for children have been provided at the center of the development. Two points of access have been provided into the project. One off 19th Street at the north end of the project, and the other one off Victoria at the south end of the project. No access is provided off Archibald Avenue. The entryway from Victoria Street will line up with the entrance to Tentative Tract 11608 on the south side of Victoria Street. Full street improvements will be required along 19th Street, Archibald Avenue, and Victoria Street, Improvements will include, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street light, landscaped parkway, and pavement. Forty -four feet of dedi- cation is required for the Victoria right -of -way while on Archibald Avenue, a Lien Agreement for the future construction of a landscaped median island will be required. The interior road system is a double loop pattern which meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordinance at 32'curb to curb. The streets, landscaping, and open space will be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. • • Staff Report PD 81 -05 (TT 11173) -3- October 14, 1981 • The preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and given conceptual approval. The applicant will be required to install a portion of the master planned storm drain in Archibald Avenue through its current terminus at 19th Street to the existing inlet structure at the S.P.R.R. prior to recordation of the final map. Also, a drainage study will be submitted to the City Engineer for review to determine adequacy of the existing catch basin and connector pipe on Victoria Street adjacent to the project. The catch basin and the pipe may have to be upgraded if the study warrants such requirement. Landscaping is being provided throughout the development in accordance with standards and policies set by the Planning Commission (Exhibit F). The applicant proposes to install landscaping and fences along the in- terior loops of the project as shown on Exhibit G. A 6' slump stone wall will border the project along 19th Street, Archibald Avenue, and Victoria Street. The wall will undulate along its entire length with the setback from the property line varying from 9' to 26'. Mounded ground cover with Oak, Sycamore, and Canary Island Pine trees, will help reduce the visual impacts of the wall, but the Design Review Committee recommended more variation in the material and design of the wall (Exhibit H). Also, dense landscaping along the eastern property line will reduce the impact of this project on the adjacent single family residences (Exhibit I). A meandering • sidewalk will be provided along 19th Street, Archibald Avenue, and Victoria Street. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan will be submitted for approval prior to issuance of building permits. a The Design Review Committee reviewed the project finding it acceptable as a style for this area. Detailed colored renderings, site plans, and building materials sample board will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed the Environmental Check List and field investigation and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environ- ment. If the Commission concurs, a Negative Declaration should be issued. CORRESPOIDE!ICE: A public hearing was advertised in The Daily Report newspaper on October 2, 1981 and 83 public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 300' of the project site. To date, no corro.nondence has been received either for or against this project. RECO!,nrNDAT IOI;: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of Staff, adoption of the attached Resolutions with recommended Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. _7 Staff Report • PD 81 -05 (TT 11173) -4- October 14, 1981 Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:CJ:cd Attachments: Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Previously Approved Site Plan Exhibit D - Elevations 8 Floor Plans (7 sheets) Exhibit E - Parking Analysis Exhibit F - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit G - Typical Streetscape Exhibit H - Typical Street Elevations • Exhibit I - East Property Line of the Site Exhibit J - Phasing Plan Part I - Initial Study Resolution with conditions of Approval • (' WO R- rvesao -r f I c.D.P. Aii D I CSI. I 6 t Y • Y.I . 1 .i y I,a •� i � T � I T1, !W wTENTATIVE TRACT No I I IIS AND TENTATIVE TRACT No 03E0 SITE UTILIZATION AND RADIUS MAP NORTII CI'T'Y OP ITEM: �— R:1 \CI -IO CL'C:AM0. \(;A TITLE:�I�e �;,,�r._ „n r_I r��Y• PLANNING DIVISIO N scmz N75 GQ II STATISTICAL SUMMARY • PAM $42 102 117 L-4 I (22 WALES 2u UAMCf SPACES _24 VNICq SPACES 257WAaS P�w Pwv� 2M GAIUM SPACES ag V45R. SPACES ... .... oarl 12 W�" CE�A -VACES VICTORIA PLACE r, A DEVaOlYaff BY Md BROCK & SONS, NC NORTI i CITY (N." RA CI K) CUCAMONGA lll,.\NNI,NC, DIVISION, EXIIIII11-: SCALE: 0 • Ix O I FEN 1: ftf-vnlL-r NlTr<%;�Ln �:ArE 'FLA ,.xi imi r; SCAII H Ts )c / CITY O R:\ \CI X) CUC. \NIU \G:\ PLANNING DIVISION I I cJ 1r� u 1 C) Z • O to atf Y U O cr Lum Im ar z Qr tea IU w w 0 7a " h m r . .. . .1. Il'I \I N TITI1 t t > Vnflrtil�. K:IC6T 1 OF-7 0 0 q >{ rye VICTORIA PLACE A DEVELOPMENT BY M.J.BROCK & SONS, INC. 9 C I"1 Y OF RANCI10 CL'CANIO \GA PLANNING DIVISION' FA W� tp., !.'NeloA t:C111R11' �_ SC. \I.L: NTS ZcF7 ff7k10 z V V MAUI I 71 En z O in ad Y U O cr U m � �m aZ a� o a W CITY OF 17T. %1: " Lt 11 RANCHO CUCAM NGA rITLE; JQ- Valh-lL, PLANNING DIVISION Lxi nnir: n ° sc, %I.e: M-F 3 <r- 7 b t6 6 Pi 0 0 CJ i a i CITY OF RANCI IO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION r i U z 0 �e Y U 2 U m � Jm O.z <W 2 aCL of ui UW 0 IiXllllil'1' ��D° SCALB; f-f75 °Ica7 C c` n*�r • VICTORIA PLACE A DEVELOPMENT BY IdJ.BROCK & SONS, INC. CI' Y OF I :ANCI -10 CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION f49;i' i:.J17J\ . Trrl.h ! 1- w4r:-Ns� L�Illhrr: h" SC:\LG: rMT s rr- 7 /" 0 0 0 First Floor Plan ..s M. ii 'l Second Floor Plan VICTORIA PLACE A DEVELOPMENT BY M.J.BROCK & SONS, INC. CI' N OF RANCHO CUCAm0 \(jA PLANNING DIN ISION' EXI NMI' IL_ SCALE: GT -. 6CF7 107 NORTH � I 2;� I t' First Floor Plan ' • .a Floor Plan VICTORIA PLACE A DEVELOPMENT BY NLJ.BROCI(& SONS, INC. • Second Floor Plan NORTI 1 J CITY OI' m:.m: 1 t I ' " \CI I) CUC'- "1()\GA T'ITI.E -6= —EL n- /4i • PLANNI,G DIVISM' rwo;l Ant ur - -, 7 cr -- 7 I Iri • p L`rplll ^"',n`] VICTCRIA A DEVELOPMENT I r i Imo. w�l a SONS, HC STATISTICAL SUMMARY Ue6 PPOOtFT A� 611p.E! PAM w lu 1n PN MIfgl 122wA PFAMm t1 WI s t6I 9F1 PM(MPPOVtl91 ew Wn�lIPl tlgtlrnwo �A f�1t� 1CCIEAiIdlCplpl Spn(£! CITY OF n Alt " 0 " • RA-NCI-10 C CANDNGA TITLE: Pi•� /�N:^ •1E1, \LY_`.JS PLANNING DIVISION BXI IIRIT : SCAI.E ) P A N'ORTI 1 C ge 3� R SxS x F �5 F5 g CITY OF ITEM: "0 I'L ; \NN \G DIVISION EX—E nn;�TT sc.kl.E. IID v� NORTH • L VICTORIA PLACE-- A DEVELOPNTNT BY MJ MOCK & SONS, INC 0 �.A. AVE" CITY U, RA CI I() CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEN I: -, I ill" NORTH IQ DO ni G. LVLI 0 z w zt Lo • J 0 0 0 W V W 0 6 2 W f 0 a W ENIIIIII ; "J" SC: \[-E: NT> I i-T V V NORTI I --a ;s ^d I� 1A/� DCTaLP ENT & SOW W CITY 0I, RANCHO CLC: MONGA PLANNING DIVISO\ fi STATISTICAL SUMMARY rwSE 2 PECRFA F N C TER 3 22 O 3 4 J6NO s 5 as i S T014 111 M s ITEM% N r TH"i. is ILL ,IN(- 'f L.y,! exuuaT "T— sc,v -r: rI—r 1) q NORTH 0 • n A Ll `I r- CITY OF RANCFO CUCAMON'CA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects reauirina environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Co- nittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Com- aittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three dcterninatinns: 1) The project will have no environntente.l impact and a Necative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the propc= -ed project.. PROJECT TITLE• Victoria Place Tentative Tract No's 9369 and 11173. APPLICATT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPTIONE: M..1. Brock 8 Sons, Inc. 714/529 -8170 _ Ib96 Creenhriar Lane, Suite 224 Brea, Calif. 92621 NAd1E, AC`DRESS, TELEFIIO;:E OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED CONCLTZN7N ^v THIS PROJECT: Mr. Fra•ilc `dill'.ms 7141-46 -SSI6 A...oci,ltnrl F.ngin eer s. 316 Fast "E" Street. Ontario. Calif. 91764 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AM ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) F.,vt sH,, -( Ar,M11,14 A'! mww hot ... o 10th Sr. rroer. and Vic tnrin Strent. A11% 7.n 2- 161 -21 Y, 211 ^ - 181 -24. LIST OTa Eii ^?: ?TITS hT.CES Si, R'! FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAT, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERIMITS: Fnc roachment. Permit -1j1th Street Improvements, Caltrans; White Slipn, Real Fnrnrn r--1 .l..... r; ... ...,.r n,. r. ,.... F,...r 6111 C ;— .1.1 . a 1.1 -- of Rancho Cucamonga. I -1 1 )S PROJECT DCSCP.IPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A Planned Unit Development of 122 patio hones with 51 Lots of the South portion to be developed as Tract 9369 and the re�ai nine i1 Lots of the North portion to ho dgypl. pad ac Trarr 11171 The Pro iect contains 119 kesident is Lots and 3 Common Ownershin Lots for recreation and landscaping purposes. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 18.20 .Acres Gross or 16.28 Acres %et. There are no existing buildings. Proposed buildings will include 119 structures for an approximate total of 242,040 S.F., including garages. DESCRIIEE THE EN17IRC !F7TAL SETTT.`:G OP THE PROJECT SITE IN'C LT :D ; —. INFOR:*ATiON ON TOr` ^v GF.1Pc Y, PIA!TS (TREES), ANI >J,LS, AIFi CULTL'-AL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURRCCNDING PFOFERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR. USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEL S): Prrnercv slopes more or less uniformly from i:orth to South at approximately 3t;. An urn"ed drainage ditch drains southward along the South 3/4 of the Nest boundary of the property. The site is vacant with the exception of • several large trees and some brush along the ditch. The ditch will he 1 sand, gravels, cobbles and boulders of great depth. Identifiable wildlife Thu" are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Property has been Arrhlbnld is sinpla family residential and an existing hlohile Home Park. To cho ,'orth across 19th Street is an existing neighborhood shopping center. ro the East is single family residential separated by a masonry wall. Is the project, part of a larryer project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, rov as a whole have significant envirc mental imca ct? • z- 2 0 • i r WILL THIS Pro,ir.CT: ' YrS NO X 1. create a substantial change in ground contours ?' X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 6 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flam7ables or explosives? Explanation of any YFS answers above: (5) Tree= to be removed are within the drainage ditch t• be filled and in the Archibald Avenue right - of -.ay. IF;P7'.7T.•T: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CC]'7I 'ICATIQN: I hereby certih• that the statements furnished above .:7 in the attached exhibit;; present the data and in`or..aiticn rco•,iired :or thi= initial evaluation to the gent " my aH]iLy, anti that the :act::, statements, and inf r- � cn pn :; <cnr. ri arc tnic anti correct to the hest of my 1 :n- wledge an:, be]. ief. I further understand that additional inforoatirn may bn rr.cuirc.d to be snbmittcd hefc:c an acicg'.mte evaulation can be made by the Dv%v1opnv11t Review ccm-littoe. Date 4--29-81 Signature Title T-3 I17 P) Rcsxne�ITfAL consrrncrlDv The follc:aing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: M. J. Brock d Sons. Inc.Tr.9369 Specific Location of Project:N /E Corner of Victoria b Archibald PHASP. I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PI(ASF 4 TOTAL 1. Nuaier of single family units: 4 19- 18 41 2. Number of multiple - 4 4 - 8 £anily units: 3. Date proposed to 1182 4/82 6/82 - - begir. ccnstruction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model 4 and e of Tentative S. Hedronns Price Dance Plan I (2000) N/A .Plan 2 (30DR) N/A Plan 3 (350,4) N/A 5/82 9182 11182 - - 2 5 2 1 6 11 1 10 9 + w 11 RESIrUNTIAL CONSTP.i1CTION • The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: M.J. Brock 6 Sons. Inc. Tr. 11173 Specific Location of Project: S/E Corner of Nineteenth 8 Archibald Number of multiple family units: • Date proposed to �egin construction: • Earliest date of occupancy: Model A and p of Tentative Bedron:ns Price Rance Ian 1 (28DR) N/A Ian 2 ( MR) N/A Ian 3 (38DR) .N /A l 6 2 8 8/8� 10/82 _ 1/83 3/83 7 3 PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 4 PH SF 5 TOTAL Numi:er of single family units: 32 30 62 Number of multiple family units: • Date proposed to �egin construction: • Earliest date of occupancy: Model A and p of Tentative Bedron:ns Price Rance Ian 1 (28DR) N/A Ian 2 ( MR) N/A Ian 3 (38DR) .N /A l 6 2 8 8/8� 10/82 _ 1/83 3/83 7 3 21 10 14 15 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -120 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING • COhih1ISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -05 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR 18.2 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TH STREET - APN 202- 181 -23, AND 24 WHEREAS, on the 26th day of June, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTIO;1 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding • properties; and 3, That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTi O;! 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Cade, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 81 -05. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81 -05. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be for °Warded to the City Council. 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract • No.'s 9369 and 11173 shall apply to this Planned Development, I J0 Re soiuti un NO 31-12U Page 2 • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: �i� /,N•�N/ ✓/ Jeffrey,King, Cp'airman / ann 1, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Dahl, Rempel, Tolstoy, King • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None i l RESOLUTION NO. 81 -119 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 9369 AND 11173 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract M1lap No, 9369 and 11173, hereinafter ";lap" submitted by M.J. Brock & Sons, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total planned development of 117 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land in the R -3 zone, located on the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, AP "1 202- 181 -23, and 24 into 118 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NO51, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings • in regard to Tentative Tract No. 9369 and 11173 and the Flap thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of develop- ment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to hmaans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not li;.ely to cause serious public healLh prohlews ; (`) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. J • r 1 U resolution No. 81 -119 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 9369 and 11173, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All fire access and turn around requirements of the Foothill Fire District shall be met and the final map shall be adjusted accordingly. 2. Dense landscaping adequate to buffer the adjacent single family homes shall be provided along the eastern tract boundry subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 3. Side -on garages and combined driveways shall be used wherever appropriate, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 4. On- street parking shall be clearly designated with striping. 5. A minimum rear yard setback of 20 feet shall be main- tained on all lots within the subdivision. 6. A 15 foot pedestrian path with a 5' meandering side- walk and fully landscaped shall be provided at the rear of lots 1, 2, and 3 from the recreation center to Archibald Avenue. 7. A detailed wall design for the street front shall be submitted and approved by the Design Review Committee. B. Approval for the previously approved tract maps for this site shall be null and void. ENGINEERING DIVISION 9. The applicant shall install a portion of the master - planned storm drain in Archibald Avenue from its current terminus at 19th Street to the existing inlet structure at Southern Pacific Rail Road prior to recordation of the map. The cost of installing the drain shall be credited to the storm drain fees for the project and the City's standard storm drain reimbursement agreement will be executed to cover contribution which exceeds the amount of these fees. .0 UiI Un "o. �1-11`J Page 3 C 10. The Design Review Committee shall review line of sight problems, if any, along the east property line in relationship with the existing single - family dwellings and the proposed two -story struc- tures. Any problems shall be appropriately mitigated. This must be accomplished prior to final map approval. 11. The southerly right -of -way line of 19th Street shall be realigned to meet existing right -of -way line for the adjacent parcel to the east. 12. Prior to recordation of the map, a drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review to determine the adequacy of the existing catch basin and connector pipe on Victoria Street, adjacent to the project. The catch basin and the pipe may be required to be upgraded if the study warrants the requirement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF BY: ATTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1, .JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucar.:onna, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coiamission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Dahl, Tolstoy, Kino Remnel None 9, L11 • i A. E CCPARF:ZIIt of COI:UNETY DE'IELOWIERT STPI(RaiO CO VII0b5 sual,t: 1Ef1TATIVE_ TRACT g(1. 97G9 & 111173 Ali limit: _i'I_,I_&F.(1CK( Lot at Ian: _HC ARCHIBAL9 —S- 19III ,nose Ite11 cncc,s, are (a,d,t ao, of ....avat. APpLIC.'bl SII %,LL CO'.EACT THE R_:'.: OI'+i S �a'1 FOR C64PUIRICE WITH IRE MINIMS Co:DIIIL:S: Lte Cave X 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans an file In the Pl inn ing ot""on end In, conestfgns coYtlrned herein. X 2. Perked she plans and building elevations incprporating all conditions of ao r.,at shill to z. x,,t,j to the Planning Oivislan prior to issuance of tutld ; X ). Aaprava) of this rr terse shill not waive (oTDllaiae with all Isola., of tee 2 q lroivnca and Ili acne, applicable City Ordinances in effect at elms of r„I I Va; hell Irt I Uags. The deulop• -r sr, Jl p,crle all lots with adequate sldeyarJ area for I .... atlan Yenl:I, s.o sa p.,,.,nt to City Standards. _ S. hash r epbtle areJsr stall be enclosed by a 6 root high m my well wit" vle� vItIr.Iing g : ....mans [o City ttln411G1. Lacllian ,hall be silbluct to adrmral by tIm Naunin9 OPrtalon, X 6. A s v.le ur n al Shall M s witeed to the PIII ng llivlzton far re Il an na pt,ra,altprilr to Issuance of build,." permits, X 7. An rant a orb ;anccd, sic lvd sng air tandiboueri, shall his arcbfex [u re ly is te';ra41. J:u fran v aid the s wit battered ( aJilrmt N.je IIcs and avo-ts ,t .: a 1c1 by n.- Plannla9 am flooding orris Ions. X 9, Prior to any n f ine pl.,ct sate or easiness activity being co' (ei ineman. all mna+: u•rt of a ?nn'ral cceto.old bore, small be tine etin LO tie 1a.I ;lactlal of th2 orreetor or CYVVnIty CeveloPacrlt. . 9. ,or map owl snail become nail and veld if building permit [s are of ivsveJ tat in ter pr aJ eIf Shawl onv yell fr.n the date or project approval. lo. A, a eon,; Pal ose Perrin, this protect ,hall becuce -11 and veld In elgnb rn (I:11 n 11. eats of approu 1, uses' Prmit, are rimed or use a,I,., ^d I, tc,111b'd" X It. A b,lollr,l Iron Unq plan ,hall be irtrnitlnd to and approved by tau• Planning ima prior I. ,s Sn lace of bu ild inq "reaits. Such plait shall ,nJ lc Jte 'I'll. ill.r+Ir"'oo'. to .... vn. nagnt Ina method of sliiel Jan". ne 191uhg shall IJ.enely affect WoCent Druprrlles. 0. X 12. All s- iantn9 pools-installed at the time of initial development ,hell be liar n..a led. X IJ, Yltun2cd todes[rian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided trim.: !rut the Jcvel hPlIel to connect deal l in.!, wi in ahem Moll and rcvmuanel u,n. 0 Project 2a. X la, nn trash pica on hall be for Indlvldoa, units wish all re<rp ti <Ies shielded from Dubl If view, If no central sled Irish receptacles are provldeJ. 15. 511mard DAt,b toyer plans shall be totmlled to and ao n,val Ly the Cll, planner and amlding Official prior to occupancy or the first unit. X 16. fill bualding'S aid Indnrdml units shall be I11ntifl,d In A clear ant ...USI manner. Including pro bar illu ®meson. X 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dud bolts and locks shall be Installed an each unit in this project. X 10. Security devices such as window locks shall he Installed an each unit. 19. All unit, within this development shall be prIplawold to be adapted for A Sala, water Pea ung unit. X 20. Energy man Serving building materials and appliances a required to be oarated Into this Project to include such Hwang are but not limned to reamuccd o nsurnUon snm.cr heads, better grade of I Sulal inn, Ratio Paned ul nJOas, a +tented overhangs. spotless marl la nces, etc. X21. This development shall provide an bull. to nom. buyer, to purchase • solar ."a, lea tl r,9 unit. X 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the Sails. faction of thA foothill Fire Protection gistrlCt. 2J. local and Raster Piarocd Equestrian Trails snail be proeidnd to oinpmnt the bait in a I,J,nlI elth the Egnesarinn Trail flan. A IH-ld eN,rstr I— bill plan ...l JIing ,a du zta; Pair. cat ccnmlL Ici.cln n•J . 1,a can 1, al, a(cardarte ni Imh.City a,or,trian Lrall sfan lJ rd a. sh,l] be 1,,I 111d le and bhp mveJ by in,, Cl ty Plano r prior to ePl'roral and recordation or the final map. _ 24. this tract shat, ram or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of eV'res[n an [real i. 25. Street names Shall be rev axed and approved by the rity Planner, in aCCOrJJnce wi tai [he adapted Street paring Potty, p,,a, to approval and racaNataan if IM final map. ^� 26. If thtz davelarynent intends to restrict ecdc Strldh Or animal related sole, la specific lot, or prohibit b t, rely, ,ben A up, of the C.C. 6 ll.'s --It he s anitted to and ru er ie.rd by fe Cloy plann prior to apwowl of final map, 21. I.,, project shall provide percent of affordable housing I.0.1 rents. ill cenf.. a with MlIal Plan I.C.0h, policies amt fill hnu,ug n tcru Ja(med ship the rrawth Pawgvurnt Ordw Affurd,billty sb.III bI dvte.mu.ad by c ens m....I Airs, rents Ind median sheen levels a[ the till of c..Itiocuon of the protect. an aqr evvn•nl td such shall be approved by the City Planner prior to Issuance of building permits. Pe rkln 6 Yrtu urlar Acces♦ _ I. A11 Parking tut )an scared Islands still have A win i.mn outside di.c lion of 5' and shod con Win an 19' walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking lot trees stall be A minlmum 15 at Ian sl+o. _ J. All e.p.ur as1< notes sn,ll ee , min,.e,n of 25 reef ride. A- ,race. :,vrunL< rrf< (ve LII`rc1 11 1"1 ". is ry -.,rot cap, trv:[IUn in ae.nIr,"�e vr, r[fvolLrll x S. A11 parking ip,ea•t Snat1 ee JsuE:r strived. n. Udri vE4.11 }'s er II. -rm t_.ati- arF� each op<ners Where e, 5 then 215 eet. J .• ull .r/ Lla,n t.l. x9. The co.u,a ,u. Conn. rr'. zr r -t inns veil r ic[ [)f,tma e.1 r fa [sneak !ate (nc SU�n,rmi sr G: vn,. 5v e.y all 11.e yr inc plc. souru of irons norw[rmr x- 9. 6a pr.l min seaa Lr. y r +,I wr th in [ne m[cr mr cr trill lL [e.ICad the aL lY pl�[ni �,lni than rfu n error ;v r u„ [fg ,l ti. C. ta•r—"-`P2 nJ[ _X t. z ae [a ntd I,r.nttery era r ,rtron pen shall be w ,,,rl in am by Into Planrrv, urrruuc p a, a Ltt "'a c% of cuisine - °rrroree L "1 161.1 hers z.•Ii u 9 Pb:nr ts. tr.ri 1, in.t [•.,r r�. V.•tr la[r[rc.11110'. n. 11rI [P a'.- hh"Itil Plan hl ,all <'. 1-111.11 : in t t, [ter Je r It,. r _ s rr •ur 1. r.r t Ir ef; t ,. c.: flat an c „et In to ac rnL :er. uronmed t /(e5 r t. 41aut.`J I [er1,L 1.c cl meth,JS,L.UinJ u1 n •[rJ t0 J.I .[ r.,l r U r 'tar[ IS [ I Iry LetSfrN: grad 21,n n.f .tl,prUVJl ffJ to _x 1 Sir'I IIL o, IS ell ¢e or t n rr , ..r to [L^1Ya1 LV 19 Jn aloe 5 ir9cr• shall be n'tnlleJ to C.,I ...'a , n,n re 51, ,aereit [refs in, u,.. Ci tr Or nJ•,[10 u erta And 2P on t,R nv s , r v "�9e c/ every ]o• Pn mtenor _ c aeL S. a AnJII [Oe po lv SJf troy Ver gr -it acre. Ld:rpr,,A o! o;e fol;oven, if zes. [J and lLn, anal 10. -5 v uwr. [-tad welr.pesnU 201 21' E or „rger. Io[ -IS live. S. All IJUOSCapeJ nr a I'll tit nehtemee In o ,,,,by end c dition, Fier Irmo [nn ving on- ...d.. ....!r, anJ JeL ri i. 6. All 11c, L".1, in .c SS of r e (S) (eel (n rtrtieel he lyl,[ and or 5:1 0 V l Cn er ng S I.,n [v,llr^J in v r prdar.f, unto 5 ,II ncl u.m [I: Crl/ of pafcU Cu o. nn9t u[n slope pl an Ung Snr et 1enJ f Lut alt Uf loess..: :L tfd •i J nl <O rer a. rrirr lJ tr v.0 urJd m aaLm hr Pi ave mgrant rr ng¢ron sr JII Le ¢nb nupv 1 if. v10rvn 1 unit n I'll .nJ n nog I- Ji,I,,r hi 4nt Jcerrluprr until cafe -f r.pv.y For u.]re vin L. v . Pri r EO releasing nJ V e PLnn mg SLn lr to J, 4v nv[.a[ ern [I [IC IdArs sfa 11 Lr cn +ipl tea .e [Aa[ , 51 In vin SIJC In rA condntinn. x ).. I.I .J....Y_ UI'nn JrrJ t, ar.J Inn ,:filing 4,J11 be (illy ra.lrntaincd by a I. Pr meet /n.n< sret ur. c1 r. Ur.r .: .c ap I'lle to thr City- Sufh preol nail Lr u1.111tlJ _a ",i City pr..r In ISSU Irr[e UI r<rm, u. r nr,rlmng b. tor' front yard bnd5caping, and an apprhpriu le Irrigation system, sMll be 1 tall[' by 'he olll:a ilr rn JLLCrJa1.Le wfin Sutnrtted pions. Tri,c436� X 9. The final det19n of the Perimeter Pa,,.,ya, v,l h, laneu.,y nn0 arrJ tiv'e. yr lYS hill Gf nfluJe.l In the r retl LmaIcall plant and [nail Le SuL lfGt [n apVrOVII LY the Planning r0 iv l51nn. 10. n m,nimum or s OF the tree, Plantttl v11Afn the Speciaten timirce f. Dfa)ect. tine be _x IL SPtt ltl Iand"ape features svcn as rnvnjing, allun,I racy, snot i.yn sIa n of en, neJrrA•r ing srdf.ralli IV9Urrrer t, <ei J r.Jri Lnntal rr.rr,.ir) n if ofrf:) IanJiea ring, S J ]ICn P slyn5 street, anti Victoria Stree�+Ilrthiha.d.Ave___12tiL Ant [Lines nro,' sfa for Lnis Urry <I Ct +Rnt shall tr O`gnM In wnfaru,nce by t , p Cra,ail Islve SIP" Ord,mnco and sLV ll rc,W ne rerinr dnJ ypr oral 4Y the Plamn ng 0, vis ion prior to in ualgben of svcn [Lines. 2. A r.n i[U.n Pl ar fry Olr Li larP for Li for t, [rev fervelUW -nt V-11; L^ Balldn.rJ De,mrts� for approval prrprt lu V ywn,, of J -Pp "sal no '"It "get" the arc net eprmvea vith e,I, fen AJ,L [tonal A 1 Rr u" rev its. and apPfpval. Ofrel.p"nt flM,,, Shall be aecpnplished Prinr to the , nee 0I r Dui 10 (ng pr•, rai 1. su e $. Deventl loivivpn pment Rlo. vler Shall be aC<omplfShed Prior t0 recortln U On or t,,, < final „ m _iL J- Apprip I yr *epode e u a 117773 & 9369 or Y� 151 -Uh 0 t�, is n.ap a 4u4Ject to mf approval -�— Cit—counc _d, THS Co „ditiohal Use Perini its— __ - - -- -- rhich time lire Planning Cam-(11Wn meY edd .1 delete fandT[lont drnrero ae at the COnds[i Deal 0se Pefmi t. 5. The developer i5 required to Obtain the loll ov Lein signed 54[enrrnt by purcnortrt of names wn ich nave a private or p,,,tic fgvfi Irian trail on or ar,J ascot l0 [Il<If prOpff Ll. In purchasing "I home located on let unJer; ;land- lnetiard tat 1 here read Ge Tract C.C^ 6 S. 1 ar,d en[ for the Per.,, SIT win senile[ to a rutual lipmeSl to 9a sir access. g fgnfstrian traffic Signed rc�na ytr '- -- Occuoncy- qnt IS [0 be filed LY the de-eloper with [ne City prior to of copantp X6. Prior IO a ... O,al and recdrdatiUn or the final mac, of Prinr to ,isu]nce of burltlinq pmmitsI nom no sued rrs foe nap vo i Fenn ..n 4•n ¢r[r /¢et ion lean ell arfw [It School U,atrict5, mall ns wITri stud [o itc 0tc, ,;.,tot U/ CU,nyn i tr 0evelolratnt rain states that aaegoate I nnnl 4[Il isle a It.I tee Ce Pahl< Jf ecCO,eq Jat,n. stud en t5 ,I :ne ra [e.l AY trfac {r I t,,, ro UCn letter or certification, mint rt,ve neon ssnr`i hY Ins ILhnvl On[nct v, info Jinzionb`aPaor or,., asuance olt [Leal map aPVmese ,n "I ca UY Lee inn - VrUJeC{t. Ve rml(S r he UI II ULU<f a arntnal .� )•nor to +- 1.11 and eel orduion of the final map, or nrlor to the I ... dre, .f Indic •ttt s scrolled. ri[len l lr , (e• vl fr.i.f . i<q [w [tv s and Haler fau ll tofu a all N+ ..Ir ! 11, sod .,I... I. shall 1.. i =I ..11..1 to tt.. C n c So1 Tel Le ;t Lv I L/ d (uol Cs', ".., I (toil . al Lrc •. cl v[J•v x of { nM1t in 11.1 1 -, of lull lr tl n•I plan lx� IIn melt a ill State ta.nt facllillet .Il lu ll hie lrs rnl U.'A u." t-..e CITY. -1{san a.L11 nc :la 1In .IOg all ., nivc 111Id'ill ion. tall a: i. I .s t'.I II hl 11 doll dint void If Ne tents All w4•lirl sit. n.vp n•L .•1 sill r - illdle, re. .e1 w al.. .L�a(:2) era . aI of .... as ... n I�'f is hp t grantee 4YVIla Plan. lint Co...mu inn. 11..5 IaeJ as a total f, v.•lolnrnt p 0", and .l t . +I rSrn nt ration rely . Ln nv •1.., of .. - a .al •Iry ,.:n Ir:li.n ".1, t In hnvl aop•o II rat .I' ..W ll.o of [he a,p Ii O�' sae o-1 s: on w .ulryto be nun LceJ as vast hare . npRlCAor STALL CJ :ITKf TfE !Lll t_n l :_p :_nl_e :_51_ep FOR CCI!P[Il:CE WITH 11tE FoLL[fil1+ Cf'Il111IC ::S: - r. Site nyJn...ln•I x I. Le a. .c i n Shj I l c *ply with the latest adopted On i form Bid Id 1119 Cn!e, -- 4: e:o w < o :frc.. ?'II " , Core, na ❑dint Electric Cdde. and iii a 1111 .Ieµe__a.,nJ or..Ina.ees 1n effef[ It woe Iwe fir us.u.f. 3 Y 2. Dr 1-r tJ 11s,liel of 4u11:1ng permits for [M-0.5t1Ele Ccf,tioetion. ev16n1Ie Sr 111 { f a tic i :I 'Jis[rllt Fr re thief Ina, I an., —I,, later -;.I: fl, ine In..trtb.:n 15 avvl Table, perm., Conpletion of rC•,m «fd fire X T. prior to ire 1 u of a oondm9 permit Cdr a new residential shell log nl t(,) Or .a 1prVel b.n siting or. N), we ip,'il mane solo p,I, de. of c; I.n at V.• xstill v, eI file. S +c:1 feet mI, itclude. Pct act le l :.rtee ca. City e• a a: 11-c2,od Fee, Par[ Fee, Bra ore.e fee. 5yste'is + C.- . e::, •.t fee. Peral[a +J pun flecking Fees, and SCt.ol Feat. I- prior I. in, 1 of a Eoilm :g pelmrt fps a ciul o mad,lliol d —or: c a -JUUn to an sits n9 level o(m.¢nq rthe n applican[r shell ply .do: t rtes It ,nee abl."l J rate. Such feet ad, 1nt 1.111r. A.[ "II TO li -'r •J t: asters CereloDns" Fee, Oraire'd Fee. Pernik and Cla. Ca, m, Fret. S. Street aldit : :es mall be provided by the Wilding official. 6. Cell vrq um et 8.111 W will fire retardant matefial and non - <onn.tbme .aur mvrfial.•s ). nn c ....I: mgt tlr In hale Ism W11 oi., Held tlon 11, id, we Street .,J-1. 1 1,.ln al II t oral used tom around winao+s and wood siding or plant. .... .11 fe Ili rile..... 1. Pro, air, Cunld lines• +I tt [la UaUnrm d.141ding Code for proper tr line Clearances ,ed,us.r,ng use. ar. add nrr.,,0,ovrnet. of rsvi,ing Wud....is. 1. Caistln9 bas ldiug(s) shill be made to Cu.ply 1101 Cu/rent ONding and Food, rr9.lapons for IJ,r, intended us, or the Luildo, (bill be demal"hed. 3. Es table Se.e9e dlSpo:al fat l 1. pes shall be r o:ed, filled annl(n. 0...Od Co us•i•IY wills ill Unif.rm Mullin, Epee, ado Unifarm 0.1 Told, Code. Woo, n. rradlpq - x 1. G, din, of the idlest pfdpertY shall Le i uram<e .ILO .... a. s Tum -- Yu lid lug [.4,, Clly Lfa•ung S:a =Jams and a[cn.I1J gra.I.ny pru b[es. I:., flwl ,ru'Jing plan stall 4e in suns ten b al cenfo:manee nth v< 11"O "S Caneeptuet gr.tding plan. X 2. A soils report stall u• petoardd by a 9m 11 heo engineer ldcemed by the State of C.111 (o /nla to Vrr fo fn svcn nark. ). 1 geulog lcal recv[ lino le wqufra, +gush led r,gid.... geo loglst end sutnuthd at the n:L or +p pl qn; inn for g11J my plan It "", a. Tare nail grind, plan shall be 1.1,11t to rear•. and as,'sval 1f Lle fl -din, Cn +:thee NIJ 5III Le cv` Il tt...l prior [ cleat tun or we final 1Lfd- Il1ae.. nap .r 111 -idle of to it L ln, permit I.I,ICI.Lr._r 11 -1I first. S. As a custom.lat subdivilirn, the rollo.nng re 1di •inlets shall be m -t: a. Surety s5.a 11 be p.,I,d and a +•I1 d,,,, a c.. tee. gda .nt"old to, '\a Of all on -Si to dra INIJO fats l Ities n iesSirY for dcamtcr En9 all pal. .. to the s..tlsliclon of Ile Ouildin9 and Salety pill lion. 4. nparonnalc ea nerves, for safe d ...... I or d /ai..,.. liter flat ere .rid It", ..,In so 141,11 'fit is, fell. a e to 4e Ill in, 111d end recorded to the sitilfi,tin. of Ile Building and Safely Din Sian. I. On -site dra inec improvfm : n [s, ire et dry for w or volettlng tam wv. 0.9 , are to be installed error to istl,ance of W, lain, norm at far c ul Im m.y per wl uul .1, a YAJCCt In, .r .ntrSWtet to. ral..a geo nor, ease. in" Ifly l..g O r vl[hln a parcel relative to o.eh a building Forest is reeucs le J. d. Final grading plans fur each parcel are to be I.•tnitled to the Building nU 5afe ty Oi/isior, for appro'. al prior to istva.o of building pmmSts. (1),is nay ire on an Increvntel .r le,putlte I. All slope Dints in excess of five (5) fret in eftiaal height add of 5:1 or 9, rater slope t.11 be seeded 11th ne,i,e g, isles u n Co-pittson If gr.ldln;d .r Sucl .tler alternative n.+ll..'J Of n 1ner.l Snail be cnmyle tell to the satisf+ction of the Um611vq UFh Cial. Irrlg.tlw. stall I:a provided to Yxrn um tx the seed aa]..n in to in 9rwN to a'd n, 6 +..n to, a t ter yernum [.on. APPL MUT SHALL COIITAIT TOE Eff,IIIEEBn!_BITI510_1 FOR COYPLIA4.E Alin T.E HUNI9G �1 CO.VO1110-IS: 1. peen =b..0 and Vehi_lar ,dies I. Des i ca born Beall bu nude LY final clip of al i interior street rights. of and all nLlefsaly easemnts as lbnun on to. ronla a.c rap. 2. Oc elCat ian i1a 11 de pr Ipllp igFr[t -o L..ey a [ire sot sewing streets: varla�i5e wT d��i on `I1�•EVi �t. as shown on Tent. Tr. nla p[daitional feel on _ a:dlumul fee[ o add I i.,.II fee[ J. Corner property tine radius vi 11 he required per Oty sundard,l. X C. All rights of ni I r 19 e a to and e9 legs Is line 1.11 be Jedluted a1 f np,d: Ae M11afd Av_enur_C_o Ttiguous tu__ XS. Act Pmc11 eatnrente prell be provided or ln9 vices to all panels Ver prlrate foeds. drives. or perking .1 eai, and still Ce nOlieed an the map or stall be recorded concurrent with the map. TT 93E &t fit. —6. nde.pyte 1 >Uds sr, Sm 11 Se no a far tn[ 1.""z, 9rly dr, tote real r..,b urn of a:Y tr'uCll wn'th m11 be used for Miter, If ggUdt to x to, Vdlk,aYf tha re Ee prov (J[d between Public sideu+145 and on -sl[d tl'P i -.v lY or rn [IC p,ara .:Un Cr Ir! CrUJU3PJ business. Pt'Jfi tr ldn d4. x- y- rr „' 'v ' - s I, ....... at JrdbugP Ihall be X 11. CUVentreted Jrd sedge tic" Lndll not trust 410e.a1k 3. Under 41 Jewal4 an, s +ll to dd urwtelv1, — 0,11,.1 4e regu rrPJ drain first naD. c iN 11 Le un lolled to nIY s(a nda rd4. X B. All -`ii'l a .e cnty ItIrl •rtnin future rigLt- Of -wd, Are to be 12. An ene,gY Jatupit,r e.old . ...... n a :nv Dl me t Stull be mlhrl led y.nt[IaI Is Or to be dehru :PJ I, tl! r+P per City in........ re•lulrt�en b. to Ilse Sdtls O_, side of Re Ut/ L,9 rarer, at LLe eN of SI,.4 Stnrlt. 9. Liu ens f,r t .a is L:r -, nl, m.:.ersm of atterta,te or Ora,w la rdn.11 Iron U:C JO.n1Ve t .rOr< i,.l. - :I13 �a an cr i C uSV•i shell !! deditateJ In [LC City 51W 11 [ e4u;reJ. * Yrcier Y J. Street 1•L ._, -rn_ K. Ure n J_:d Flood ton rat X 1. The applicant will be responsible for toot trot [I On of all cn -sl to _ 1. Cenz✓. :tt lull street im0'menentx Ineluding, but not Ilnllyd to, drains gP Is[ :11u.. regmred by lee Cl [y Fng race r, lrIe, 'I] trea'I Ir C. pa nA,,. n..... c, drive iJ Dr oatnes, pa r4u ty $, n[pfSef lion drains viii Le t n S jI.;S In all In [P rICr ltrePtf. r gutted dt tire fI;[d,,^q le,stion4: �- 2. .i ago g, _e -I'O1 n,JC ""'Int within a 00 -(OO[ wide JcJ ltd [eJ r, 9sDO0..,ir tl.,ll ne c^n IZId,led .'Ur all na l r- Section S[r efts. - " -- - X ]. l — ]. Tbe Ccns(r,ct [Le is, la+rng S sing "I.Pred ,I,,ct (al It within as uv lal to m n Including. but na[ the drill under tire flata.ral IIaoJ In.ur nmce J ¢Il o JtgrJ r tn a S,do n :q I L c tt ubto , cCt to i'llslun5 or tl:dl progrnn and City Did :n.tnre :,,. $d_ II Q Cll 1,T 4. A drainage channel and /or flmJ protection uall will be repo pea [J S rt [fi r.:'[ II�r :_q_q rat I'_} x�. :•n }. VUr pro tech the structures b direr .nq Ir,tt runnfr to st ire is, or to a I _f _ ISL A:p 1,'[1 S:or :n Jraln Y AI- chi bat tl S X X X - -- _ _Lien __ _X s. Nle,y,a tP Pr 111tns Snail be nd eP mr a<t••p to ore and uit LX— .X _ -. Sri rate drainage P.IArIn, In, property o-on d,j,cnnt areal. Iv15a or i_ Y- I__i - -- Letter or dC wvta ore fro, Jovms[ream prOPertY I ers 11-111 to regulred !! nofl rrcan the'[rd C[ flo.r � where ru 1 Into nn.a to pravernes. 'Includes landsuyn] and 1 - -- slre¢IS rtquinn still) be ditgned a main, whet to my, ng rr:)a;idn on nc[er. tYPC drill .,r,.,dic het- 1brddtim Of 1 .fiat r-lb ne unt5, «n'.rUal ua111, and rot... SI I., re :nn•'41Ons, (lodd PIn(!C2 ran X e. trio, [o In, mrt bun /or 1en91Cayed ea rlM1 Ln nS and 1.1)tJ Jrlvamyt a[ prop.... Ihs II le pfd and an P9 ,isc .nrt In the pub)tc ri obt- dl -wnf• for, Iv,e. nt In allen[ Dem,t Lhall he obtained tram Pm frV f••g •nce r't u: nce, ,n adds „n to der diner pera:n rig,,, red _X_ a. the tonowrnq Stoed deal, thall be installed m the Sdt,,r.,t,d Of X 5. street r :, o. e. ne n1 an: anv laved a the ill m IhP sty o,)meer: Y Y Engineer and t",, M LY a Pr.y SNrN C`v iI [nlu, II Sa a be ,r ..ten, for pe all sheet ^•� u a .n[S. ,I” to r _ ,e Of an P [rOCCtedrent ;clot[. rlu.11 pt]• 1 a..J Cnt,les Snail sx bi 1•.0 ti on I II a hUn9 ut J ,tY __ ___ - - - - -- Ivcin bn .., In:n Ve b. Su•e[/ t411 Prior to n :u rJnU On OI t4e sap, a "Id Id -Stale nydrolmpt mJ fro iOn9e of lee City a pn"Id and an e9rt'rnent AllCuted to the ti [r sfnc lion '[ugly fur the I'ciect stall Le SU[.nl [led If Ile Ivl•h cn1y,ro1 a,nt Ua City Attoeney, 3uannteeing co.p le Uao ev,ew, to the Cr[Y tn96¢er for 'n ¢, peer to r o J:n• 3 or [Ix nap or [Le vm„aa (tw )J inq UI -., [S. -In enact tcrcz first. L Util i[r= x 2. All Street ,rpro,ementS Shall he installed to he ,lisfactiOn or the X I. t Prov,de all utility zerviclt to [alh tot inclndiny SamlarY 4 Cit> L ;sneer- error [o oc.u, ^.ancy. n b•q elrefl -C pm.er, gas, 4•I. phone and Ca41e to ten Sinn modal t. X e. rdvonrnt 1Ir,P,ng, ,.ale it g. vane and Street n ne Signing hall be X 2. All uulilrts Mn In, n uallcJ p,r pm regvi re vets et the Cli, (dq inee r. inch uJ UU) unli fret It ong mler slid (enais I ^stdew,d: hZll Ygrounl _ 9. En11:19 rill IJdd ,.game, reccnstrucuOn 11+x11 renmin per for X ]. Utility ed te+entz shall be pruvidcd to I'd Sl- ecrftcatlon or the I,df(rt a[ all ,net wtdn ,Jee,ave it- Ju, ing C,nitrvc a nu. A 9 uul uy ad nVam ei Ind she city Engineer. N r^r. del a, i[nI's 11 Ce r I,;r nd U [c.,r rl,e to,t Or gr.IJ inl and [r.e 1• I'd, - . call b�- m/u.. :cc' On coal e[ ,On of ill [In, l ru,,:On to = d' q'rel uner shall be rfippns 1ple for lee rCI4Ca U On of e Sat, I on OI WO [us E.q :nevi. uuhucs. az ,rata, rtU. xis [in9 Dubtit 5. peva Inner sLa 11 4e .....I111a1e for the L,Stallalion of street 1.1"A g III 311.1dance ,1t, Southern Cailfonna Edison Company And CstY $hndardi, ` • J1,9369 • �, 6.:hr aw a r r4ns s+Jl 6e J>si ,ned JnJ eGns f" [cn m nce[ ,1to Dit Vlct (Cnru1. Pcn will c(r5mrnv 'n Ji'J. d'Irt[or o(rtJla ultt L,v rF.crt of the County pr,.r t.. ca.: tm.,. ' f—, all Irc , au r. e] —X_ ] J[ G nJ rran JII ubL tlet nrrd athb 1 es teJ n]II r II rrocr t, s„En.t t eny M. L... rJl P.,Ir., r._ •tt a _J_ \r ��ra. rl._ •ill Oe r,,4 j a i z (allow %: n;. nn: ICr H01 5trcet _u. C. Sm _ 0. ,r... strict X I. A co, a' '�= rbven C (CG 5 sl Jrp'J.i f� _ fr'Y .I VIr]I1 Eci r.,.: nl ^J ,vi [li L6rsxvap x ]. GieJ: C]r.el ConrCrm to City st,iod"d, io, i. A I'"'wil lo I f [e i _- orJ...l D•i or ;o (i rs[ pM1aze avGJr vi lion [o prn c't nvyir.n u( p.r ,l.I: xJ V]rtal i. LanJ �., c Jrt Df (n urt ian to Ion anJ /:r loin rl( [ . liltl w x Cr[, [,. an2 rl. u.l _X6_ M1II „� n•r Ian Jic rp,.J p '.JYS er¢ requ veJ W be anneatl in LO LEe I ,,CJI C^r... m.vi.var.e XI. Wo Irrq avJ i _ ` -Ji rrir] -r -n tr +t [.nt re.!ui reJ Ll Er• InS tJ 11 cil On rrAl iC 'cJ [J'r[] c O sl ill L rr [i u tly r,.r 5 171 0 It I., I An�ur. -i mncerns or que5 ti ors on any of t" aho., itc-s are welcx•tt to c3r; P I it; 7; i , P, i igg it (71-1) or AJ" tf:c offic^s L i ; i - i Ro i Un i '. o. ri5 to or in 'a 3r of thc ,.Ovt• ' tn➢• ap mr in orlon at 'h^ aou q- ri 1 e ttin; or 1: 3 u Ini t :heir concern; i n w r r9 to t ha P I a n n n g o R q c) ) C u csr.o n,, a prier to said :,.._ti n g Rancho Cucamriinga Pl ann! rig Co7!,lission Ca to • ORDINANCE NO. //,' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 181 -23 AND 24, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R -3 to R- 3 /P.D. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION l: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental • impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessors Parcel Number 202 - 181 -23 and 24, approximately 18.2 acres in size and generally located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue, i.s hereby changed from R -3 (multiple - family residential) to R- 3 /P.D. (multiple- family residential /planned development). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shal caT use the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, AnPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1981. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: n u is nlmv nW n n nlnvn nr.n A wenw.n STAFF REPORT' o� 19:7 DATE: November 18, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80-10 - TENTATIVE TRACT 11734 - DLV - A change of zone from A -1 to R -3 /PD for a total planned residential development of 98 condominiums on 8.5 acres located at the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 207- 211 -28. ABSTRACT: The proposal before the City Council is for a total residential development of 98 condominium units on 8.5 acres of land. In order to approve the proposal, City Council will need to approve the Zone Change from A -1 to R -3 /PD and to issue a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of October 14, 1981, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above - described project and approved the related Tract Map with Conditions as attached and also recommended approval of the Nega- tive Declaration and Change of Zone, Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report: of October 14, 1981, which fully describes the project. The project, as proposed, is consistent with all related City Ordinances and plans. The proposed density of 11.5 dwellings per acre is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre). No adverse environmental impacts are antic - ipaied as a result of this project. No correspondence was received by the Planning Commmission, nor was there any opposition voiced at the Commission hearing. 1 -n �.c,. RD 80 -10 - DLv City Council Agenda • November 18, 1981 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approve Planned Development Zone Designation No. 80 -10 for the above - described project through adoption of the attached Ordinance. Respectfully s P bmitted, JACK AM, UAICP 4t- Director of Community Development JL:AT:jr • Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of October 14, 1981 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval City Council Ordinance • 0 • COro`vnconntr=rtrennrnNrA I,->„ STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 14, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner r C C x c > 1977 ( SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -10 IT 11 34 -DLV - A change of zone from A -1 to R-3 /PD for a total pl and residential development of 98 condominiums on 8.5 acres located at the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 207 - 211 -28 ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted development plans and a tract map for the above- described project, in order to gain consideration for approval by the Planning Commission. The approval of this project will necessitate the approval of four integral parts of the project; a Nega- tive Declaration for the environmental assessment, the rezoning of the site from A -1 (Limited Agricultural) zone, to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) zone, the site and building design, and the tentative tract map. This project has been reviewed by both Design and Growth Management Review Committees and has successfully passed the Residential Assessment System. A detailed Staff Report with related Resolutions and Conditions of Approval has been prepared for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicants, DLV, are requesting approval of their pro- posal, in order to develop 98 condominium units on 8.5 acres of land, located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibits A, B, and C). This property is currently the site of a single family resi- dence, which will be removed prior to construction of the multiple - family project. There are seven mature Pine trees, one Palm, and three Eucalyptus trees presently on the site, along with some native Scrub vegetation. A portion of the Cucamonga Creek Drainage Channel runs along the western boundary of the project site. There are three single- family residences on the south side of Arrow and one on the east side of Vineyard. There is a manufacturing facility located on the southeast corner of Arrow and Vineyard. The balance of the surrounding area is either vacant or being used as orchard. A multi- family planned development project was approved at the last Commission meeting for the property adjacent to the north. ):":. ITEM I Staff Report • PD 81 -10 (TT 11734) -2- October 14, 1981 ANALYSIS: The project is being developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act, as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan (Exhibits D 8 E). Attached two -story town- houses of 2 -4 dwelling units per building have been proposed. The units are either 2 or 3 bedrooms and range from 1,392 to 1,497 sq. ft. in size. Each unit has an attached two -car garage. Twenty guest parking spaces are provided throughout the development. Texturized pedestrian crosswalks and curvilinear sidewalks have been provided in order to form a continuous pedestrian system. Recreation facilities include a pool, spa, recreation room, open recreation area, and to*- lot. Access to the development is provided via Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue. The required right -of -way width for .Arrow Route is 100 feet, and for Vine- yard, 88 feet. Full street improvements will be required along both Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route, including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement and overlay, meandering sidewalks, driveway approach, street lights, and landscaped parkways. A lein agreement will be required for the future construction of a median island in Arrow Route. The east side of Vineyard Avenue and the south side of Arrow Route will have to be widened to accommodate a left turn pocket in the center of the street. The • interior roadway system is a double - looped system which meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordinance, and will be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. The preliminary grading plan (Exhibit F) has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and has been given conceptual approval, conditional to acceptance of the water flowing onto the property from the north. The project site will drain south and west into the Cucamonga Channel. Storm drains will be provided at the northwest and southwest corners of the project to direct the water into the channel. A conceptual Landscape Plan has been submitted (Exhibit G), which indicates an abundance of landscaping is being provided throughout the project site. The Design Review Committee has reviewed this project and found it to be an appropriate style for the proposed site (Exhibit 18 J). Detailed, colored renderings and a building materials sample board have been prepared and will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. The Study discusses various environmental factors relative to this project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and included it in the tentative tract file. No adverse impacts from the environment due to this development have been found. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. . Staff Report PO 81 -10 (TT 11734) -3- October 14, 1981 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in a local newspaper of general circu ation as a public hearing item, and notices have been mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 feet. To date, no correspondence either for or against this project has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of the Staff, adoption of the attached resolutions with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully fubmitted, J JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:AT:cd Attachments: Exhibit A - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B - Project Summary Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Oetailed Site Plan Exhibit E - Circulation Plan Exhibit F - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit G - Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit H - Illustrations of Wall Exhibit 18 J - Architectural Elevations Initial Study - Part I Resolutions with Conditions of Approval I�� -y NORTI I CM, OF ITF-Mr It,-\-NCI-10 CUCAMONGA TITH':.7Lef,in4xuv, 7-rcA@A— Map PLANNING DIVISION LXI (WIT: A SCALE • Spe r..W s l� V n'ORTI I C1 "1'Y Ol' ITEM: I . Ilb 8U- Io - hLV RANCHO CUC""IONGIA TITIA: —P,2+cc_+ Sum"ry PLANNING DIVISION ezIIINT Project Summary Sit. Characteristics UNS Oeacrlplbn Spe r..W s l� V n'ORTI I C1 "1'Y Ol' ITEM: I . Ilb 8U- Io - hLV RANCHO CUC""IONGIA TITIA: —P,2+cc_+ Sum"ry PLANNING DIVISION ezIIINT C � CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONUA PL\\ \1 \G DIVISION .ti • 1OI:TI 1 • ITEM: TITLE eriP ui+I i�o+ Iny • EXI1111M C SCM,r I3� • 17 n zz CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING Dl\'I,qO\ rl V NORTI I II-Em: -T— - Pb - NLY- TITI.El-L—cel'ApAural $,4- -PP A LNINIT: 1) scm.r6- c c Legend 1J V V • • CITY OLD ITI: \I: T - YD�+,O -IU �L✓ It; \ .NCI -IO CLG \JIO�(,A TITLf:StrCt.11"a& '�+1un • PLANNING DIVISION L'Vlllirr: P_SCAI.F: )III • • C C V V n'ORTI 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJIO\GA TITLE, - Ce>AL2i xkjel 6K13ng i huxIM3Q. PLA \ \I \G DIVISION EXI 11131T _F SCALE: Ti �J V V n'ORTI 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJIO\GA TITLE, - Ce>AL2i xkjel 6K13ng i huxIM3Q. PLA \ \I \G DIVISION EXI 11131T _F SCALE: NORTH • • CITY 01 ITEM: P't �. Iii Ly 'Z'-\ .NCI-10 CUC1 J f0NGA TITLE.: rr., km I I PLANNING DIVISION GXluturfZ_ SCALE v • s H nik INORTI f CITYO• [Tr..% i: —m yb 80- to -b t� v RANCHO C L:C,-\'N 10,X('V TlT1Y;.Illus' =6Argi -Irc kwi- PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT it SCALE: • I vy„ .x.,�, ..xx...,. �1 �d�i a i17 {dG i1Tl�lidk���t���Jll''�E4CT I•��C6G��fL1l,.?+', -�-� r......_.— .._...... U ".x n...1. ir, /f � w��7.iiA �� _i, Iti '— i..��� IS�aI �I;.�t , _nl���l,4 Y��'�.I� � • Q n x n..nwn © si.. su.xwn C V NORTI I CITY O nI:.�I: r wD 90 -ID b�( RANCHO CUCAMO G1 TIT,,,;: SA,cli6cAu raI J I% d i o A • PLANNING DIVISION euuriT ; 'T _SC,u.r. J4.< 15 ins. �V 'Nolm I CM, OF CUCAMON(;A TI 11.17: llt,.\\'NING DIVISION Exilmirl ZC -SCALI:,� - C r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY • PART I - PROJECT INFORPIATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no enviznmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning • the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Mulberry Place APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: American National Group, 405 South Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90212 213/879 -0900, Attn: Mr. Don VaVerka 1U,:IE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CO IICii R::I :;G 'MIS PROJECT: Engineering Service Corporation, 4576 Admiralty Idav, Suite 933, Marina del Rey, California 90291, 213/822 -4040, Attn: Mr. Robert Sims, P.E. 10CI7IOli OF 1120JECT (STREl1T ADDRFfS AZM ASSESSOR PA3CEL SJ.) N1: cnrno.r of Arrow Hi ^hwnv ind Vinevnrd Avenue: _ A.veossor's MB 2W page 21 , parcel ld LIST O'iHER PERMITS NEC-ESSARY PROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDCSL\l. AGE`ICI. ^.S AND THE: AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: _ Approvals required are: tentative map and development package; recordation; construction and building permits all within and by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino. . I -i N", • PROJECT DESCRIPTION • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: It is proposed to develop the approximately 8.53 acre site into 98 two and three bpd bpdrnnm condominiu to —h.,se units ion. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A-NY: Site area is approximately 8.2 ^_ acres -- Proposed townhouse units will -over approYimare lv 180,500_- DESCRIBE THE ENVIRO\.MFMIAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCIIJDING INFORXATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANI';.ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SU RRO iliIDING PROPERTIES, ANO TUE DESCRIPTIONA OF ANY E:QSTI ^.:G STRUCTURES AN-D THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) The site is flat and slopes to the south at an approximately 3% grade_ There is an existing single family residence in the northeasterly corner The property does not contain anv nistorlcai or cui.rurar srces. nacre are no Oak or other sinnificant trees on the sweet property. _ The property to the north of the site is vacant. Immediately westerly is a concrete flood control channel Southerly of the site is an orchard and scattered single-family dwellings. To the east is also an prchard and one s1��le- family residence. _Southeasterly of the nrnp re t'. is an existing fac[orv. _ Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant envirocvacntal impact? The project as subm i[ted represents the total ownership. There is no knowledge at the present time that anv further development is planned by others for lands adjacent to this site. z -2 -- •-- ....._._._..---- - - - - -- ter- ; WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1, Create a substantial change in ground • contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flarx-ab,les or explosives? Explanation of any Y =5 answers above: 3.) The development of 98 new condominium units will create an increased demand over ha nvi crud ave been contacted and all the to serve the proposed project. ensr this area, however, a zone change from the existing A -1 zone to a planned residential zone will be required to conform to the General Plan. ID!PJ n:'r. P.l: If the project invo L._s the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CEp.TIP1cATI01.. I hercb-. cortify that the statcm, nt., fuznish. al:ove and in the attached e:chibits present the data and ^ infox mat icn required for this initial evaluation to the ,at.. ,. o` ar.1 that t ?:a e;nent ar.d. in:or-•at'cn, pr_scntel tr•.:._ and correct, to the 'best of my knowledge and be'_ief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Develop7ent Review co- 'mittee. Date I C�I% b� Title 1-(im_N"08 S I -9 Ri SIDi:1TT.1L CONSTRUCTION The follcntinr, in_`oz ation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planninc Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to acconnodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developor and Tentative Tract No.: Amer. Natl. Corp. 011734 Specific Location of Project: Northwest corner Vineyard d Arrow Hwy. B -4 (38n.) $104,950 ' PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 P1iiI.SF, 4 TCTAL 1. Nuaber of single fanny units: 2. N='- -er of nultinle fan.'_ly units: 21 22 20 35 98 _ Datc proposed to - bccin cc.^.struction: 1/1/82 3/1/82 6/1/82 9/1/82 4 4. Sarlicst date of occ.:v a::c :•: 6/1/82 Moon! n and r of Tentative S. Ded_-o=.S Price Rance B -2 (2HR•) $97,950 B -3 (2BR.) $104,950 B -4 (38n.) $104,950 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -121 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCMIONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -10 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM A -1 TO R -3 FOR 8.5 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE - APN 207 - 211 -28 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Planning Cor,.mission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code, SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant • impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 80 -10. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -10. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract . No, 11734 shall apply to this Planned Development. I J f n U • �1 lJ .C>JiG:iVn .;0. 01 -iL; Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1981. 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Corr „mission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, Dahl, Tolstoy King None I �% RESOLUTION NO. 81 -122 J A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11734 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11734, hereinafter "Flap" submitted by DLV, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total planned development of 98 condo- minium units on 8.5 acres of land in the A -1 zone (R -3 pending), located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue, APN 207 - 211 -28 into 4 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and 14HEREAS, Lie Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: i SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11734 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. i r.esuiu C on :,a . of -1« Page 2 / • (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11734, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The actual placement of the buildings shall be in con- formance to the approved Architectural Site Plan, as shown on sheet 5 of 12. 2. A directory shall be provided near the entrance of the project to direct visitors to the appropriate units. ENGINEERING DIVISION 3. The developer shall widen the east side of Vineyard Avenue and the south side of Arrow Highway to accommo- date a left turn pocket in the center of the street at the entrances to the project. 4. The proposed storm drain at the northwest corner of the project shall be approved by the Flood Control District. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COX4IISSION OF THE ¢ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ry at the Planning Lommiss on I, JACY. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaronga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonna, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: wFt: COMMISSIONERS: Remoel, Sceranka, Dahl, Tol stoy, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None DEPAAT:'OII OF laag011T DEVELOPMENT src:.DduO CX.Dinabs Ubii, t: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N0. 60 -10 (TT 11734) dppllune: - pLsL -_ 1p[alaon:__mC VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE I.." Item, CeuctN ar [crJlllrns or .... al. CA`ptFPI'IITIU1 SIFII Cd'.:6C! LIF CL_ I:S DI V151 C'1 'OR [Omll MICE still TIIE FXLO:11::L lC3;1I A- si[r Oe_elpfn,.n[ 1. Ss to mall be develo"I in accordance ui be NC approved sit¢ plans an file In 0s, Pl an.",a Dlvislan and the <.dlt,idi con LllnoJ herein. 2. pevgrg 1.1 clans sa, nut lu ing elevations 1 orpnrating all conJlli -5 o! apps vat Y1.. be zu.,al LfeJ to [be P1enfin......... Prior to i ance of Em lJ lug C: r:1, n. s3u x ]. Pmnrwal of Inu requm[ IN?) not waive compliance with all S:ctlons aP I'd ran 1,g prJ s, 11 be all all 0Irl, app,i cable CPI, Ord it,"C', at Um dr . of 0, ing Pen )t Iesuadte. in ,elect �- a. The d,v,lnpvr shall provide all lots with Adequate s1iI area !ar PCCreetr„n V,eicle Sods], Puri. ant to City Standards. X 5. T,.,ho ;,ceuncle areas v,i,I be enclosed by 1 6 loot nigh masonry all with 1 ..... .e,,,e[ to City standards. location Shan be Subject to a,lpio.al by the Pl,ru -g Civilian. X 6. A beetle Of the '-Of nuterial Shall be sueeiLted IO the Planning Oivf Slon !or renew sue apprJa al prior to t35.ancI or Ni it pereri,3 7. All roa, ...... rantCZ, Incl.dfng air mndinoners. Shall be architecturally in [eyra tCJ, Sb,eld:J free r and the s..no b.11ered !raid adjacent pr.pill es (, and streets as r[nmrM by in' planning and Oullding Divl35an3. x 9. Prfor [i Re" use or the project site or bd]fn <e3 activity being cp,,ein l % [henwn. all co,idildnz Of apnrowl contained Morem shall be cO,iple:ed to cId the sxntac b an Of the 0`11 1-1 of Wwn.clt, oevelo"unL. X 9. Thu .. ..Oval Snell bec.ne null and v0fd if bell ld ing "trill tl are not issued !Or this pro l eCt wIlh,d one year Ir pp the date Of project approval. _ 10. As a Candlt-al lase pefnit, tills Project Shall be'.e null end raid In elg rte c1, (13) mates 111,1 date Of approval, unless PCrmiU are use aDpro.eJ Is c,cePed. Mudd or •� :1. A d.u11ed lighting plan shall be Subnitted td and IPP1.11d by Ill, Plane inn DP",..O pear in I[ uante Of h.iTding perm R S. Such plan "'all inJ mate 3 ^all x1111- I1ie feel PCa ll.n, nCl gl,l end memos of weld it. Illnting y a [ aaJatlu[ proper [I CS. x 12. 611 Saimsing pOOls- installed at the tide Of Initial derelopu[nt shall be 6. y solar leafed. �5 17. in tv ltC•1 pedestrian yathwa" aerms tir<u b lion aisles shall x provided th""'aul {h0 o "111Oprent to CannCCt dne111ng3 vi [n open hat$ t and «vmtiaml use. 1 Project AD. le. 611 trash nice up shall be for ledivichin units with .11 recepl aE lee Sbieidrd lrtan Public new, if no tentr,bnd trash ra •. grtec lee are pranced. 15. Solndard patio cols plans 11.en be su1.n111CJ to er e and approved by lthe utr Plannnd Oni lJ ing Official prior to peCUpd,¢} Of lilt• first unit. 16. All building's J onnte mvn nAeIn and og pr,", u1, Mall be 5U[n tl fl I cluU Urg proncr ill u1, mss ion. N In A Dior 12. SVI.d c e encnnr doors, s <NrItY dead Will and locks shall be Ins 411 <J on to unit +n Ims project. _X 18. Security deal... such as window lac.. snail be installed on e.[1, unit. Ig. ill unll[5 within this developeent Shall be pre,ele.arJ In p< iJ ap Led !af a tar w Irr hta Ling unit. X 20. Energy con ... ving building dateriols and appliances ere required to be ra1orporaled Into th-1 prof,[[ W Include such ,ln[ed [ Surollan shuw of head], or[ter grn d< things / in st put not limited tp windows, extended Overhang i, pl to [l est appliance(, e,v Iat... Eauble paned X 21. this Jewelorynen[ scull Provide in option to have buyers IO pvr <ha se a solar ruler heating unit. X 22. fctico n a Provided this tract o the HtiSionf the Foothill Protection Di,rIct - 23. to and vlpn letEtre- Trails shall be praviaM Inrdu,,d,t the !rail plan inJ,cac'ng widths• mOeir[ri an bail 1'IYf iCal [fan l'IeJ e�luvt trlan 1,J rt J bbe. ol, n ac d nce i1 'um 51 1`C5. 'I Ji[Inni, fM[In b. co rU it Led to and ap pro wed by Ih<pC][yy lalnn er rl and trail SmmiarJS, shall r a ion of [lie Hna1 map . P Prior [O apI,,Oi Il and _ 24. Thie tract ... ll form Or bend{ to A Mlntcezece district fir we intenance of eallestrfan trails. _j( 25. SCre[t name] shall be reviewed and approred by the C]ty Plamrtr, in acc ordence with the emapleU Street Ileming Policy, Prior to approval and recprd ... Od of wit final nap, the 26. if this developmit's intends to r w be ]p<ClliC Idt] V OS Ir I<; <quC tied O sIfell retired u ;Cs It be Sul u1J 1. add 1 review,] py t the City lPlanierpy Of the C.C. 6 II -`s final ^'ap- p1,Or he approval of �- 27. re it project spoil Dravide Percent of affordable be.3le, Ind/or ar� ""eled dIrl"11 Inc the Lr.re e,t,h .'4na gulpn lmOrJ�na u<r it i•Allor la bill, SN II he J et rates, rents and Inell ion m e le •.•is al sill ruvCU Ef II eSC is tplannf II'r a +al r[L. nn a91111,- n, LO S.In S,,It be y r P r to Isimna` d, bmlJm Pa_el yd YJU CUIar 6cceg I Iuenni t;, X 1. All parking tat IapUSCJped Isl an J] Snell ham a I be diaenilon Of S' mid shall contain An 18- wile adjacent to Pareing stall. X 2. Parking lot tree% Shall be A d-I,i i Is gall.n sire. J. bu -w]Y aistr +rJ(ns snsll tit a min rcus of 28 rest wLle. • 1. d I b" p- " .ntr'i J r,.e IreC aril flee' a rrlm rm al 'a la e[ ill ( �.n¢l [ .s4r.rctton In a<!ardan (e w�(rlr ro41nr11 I1r. vlty ¢. .. ri n.nv 1`S. 0.1V CL•'•r'J s r.ri 4'.]11 S• .. tde _•X_ 4 All units 44J11 tc pru „Y I .I;q aru. u,tr: ge<Jq,• Ju'Ir aVenerl. ). Cr`i r, .led yr tiler Cvkrl J .rt moil v 4.r1 Clot.e 1. _x_ D. ire e:. - [n 111 r ¢t tie ctw alt 'Stmw1 vr,r u,I- I. ue It 1. ..c le It., ae of boo,. VerIJ[Imr (or tneSWnere j� �•_ 9. 1e Pan ln9 sb]II L, Cr•. 'It :.I :I ".if tlm liner iar urnllal rim Dille other than 'rtk: <rd r „I C,,. Co 1r.1 RcSI+ alrnrrt ill [ a ^It' s l) ! a ".J 5 •r,I,I to ire acl(Y 1'I]nrrinJ mvlvcn Imr to r..n -n_r Jr C. Len =pp�nq Xs 1. d amts J.J 1]nJ it lPP and l n plan shall be ivtmltted In and approved ny Fe 1,1 -1. 11., 0:v r s ro :r ., .i.e ,c :...hie 41 nu a Jrrg pe rrl Is. X 2. F.rs tin" tiers sr]It qe Jrer t, er r le. A outer ul nn of .brit br • 11,11 my z InJ 1,,w III II Le :1 ^:.`l 4 i....., rr rs'1 z.1 51.01 1.11 a10 to a .ht tr.c prnor"d L Iry a t. .111 nrm. tn...rnq :.,toed:.•.ra.l v M1r x.111 t' Dlaf r`J IJr `pl,c . r eJ In 11" Pla Ile red Il na 5 1 10 m.1 Y ..J 11 It, 9lann in9 Vrvi d]nn (, nr to sap rO rJ of the f.`II 1 a0." pl dn. v z Streoe trees. a In ! 15 ga n oil site or larger. than be In;bnCd in 4rrirae ..ru. 11., ::Stor vita n III,, vee: tar [ta• (I,, nr nr, nn C, 1 .,11 t ,•l .r u , of c erY ))' no rvenor stree LS , and .''JS1 on e.terr.f ;.(motto a a. A mllonwa of SO «,ea PIr j -, Pare. colorised of the follmrino rises shall oe prav ld.'g +,U In t ^` p vet pp'nenq 2D;-21- Eon or larger• ID' -15 r_ eaten. a•rJ L.: -S 911 In s. X 5. All larW:upeJ a 11, 56+11 Le mlinufnel ,n A rlealthy and deriving ton- -- dl t I on free .mfr v :,do. • aria d:Ln S. X_ A. Al sloe Kin'I In eatry of It.,, (5) fe.I In rortle,l Might and .1 5:1 to to. 11a11 ",All to U -.. :.: ;cJ I,, . ,:y L :n I .ramie 11. door plA =g ^nti a1 1!e C I, -:f Da - <tp !,ru' '..on 11P,, piloting ell a.rdLot r1 or 1'o1 s t .vr^ sl rJ i]IaI Li e :4n[i'luinIu t, tnC:. i.11 Iu['. p11[1n1 al1 sly ncJ a neat[•'! urJ,r ill uul 1 41d ant 1, C. 1r r1r to J .,I `1 C., Y rc lov.n L 4n. g rot e <Ipr I for 1131, on.11. l of ne Sol`l all :e ,, 11111d py z Plannrls9 5tn1f to E.'. ^r'rn.` te" It 1s in :Jti,f.c lu rY (.nail ion. X ). All Da n..Iy;, ol'rn 4 Jana :wptnq Pull Lc 1.111 . I ll..n,I by It -- M eo r.,,a atenelatlpo Dr cO ;r: .n; du ept mle to the City. Satll Proof 0I munttn,n<r :tall to sur..1 ['.e'1 to :l.e C." v<1a 1. tsso vv.. nr l :u silo" De rMrtl. a. Ine front >old 4m0 :ODin ", and an aDOrepr is tP Wi'tWo system, awl bt rmullm Lr 1ne ae,Il.;,, In aaomave ,. i1h wenitud plant. �8Q -10 P 0, - 9. Ine final dnipn or the perimeter V1r Mny5, rnl l {, Ia mISLJV mq and {IJe- vrlt5 '.lull be rncloJ,..d In the re, rr.•r Inn,l«JSe p,,, aI, tr„1t Le ell Il app oral ", Inc P1J rn'1 Orrlt rOn. _X_ ID. A a. otnwm of _20_t of lhl trees Planted wmm. the Prpl ec t, sNil be tl•e, riven 111, 1111. )1. SV^C1,11 1Jrl'ISCII :e feltvres Sots 15 n ..n.l..,. Jl ivrlal r0[Y, 51'1 <Im'n al)e in ,. J ^III, n :e.rJ US (Loth r. I.W Jnd Inv StnnlSl Ln,n.l ^) and 1.11.111rtJ5yJ : <eV mq, fs 11.1;.111d Jinn) D. Slnv I. Any 51grn 111,oted for this Jry ^I4 :�^ent sna11 11 Jesrgne'I In <nnlomnncc ,n p1 IN, Ce,,rem.Islve Sign Onllnao<C and ;b]11 regoIo revIC, enJ approval L/ the Plannln9 Division prior to insuuJtlen or zuun tvyn. 2. A nnilornr, 5 n Vrngm ra for Lhis J^vclonent scull hr .L. tt,j In to, -- Plarrnlnl 0u111ton to' their review and spprowl prior 1. 1 55w tie.• of 1101Iln9 "t'. 3. lbe signs ip111110d on the SoMllted plans are nnl approved with lhlt Apprawl and will reaoire separate 5i,n r-e. one anV•v.el. F. A.luftinnal Apps vl if Ar9u irrJ 1. Drrelolment Rev aw shall be a.mvpllsh,d nrror to the nsnance of • Dultdin" Prim t, - 2. Devel. orient Peview shall so aeCOmPl iSned Prior Lo ..COrdlllpn 01 Lne final Iuba vrM1ion map. ]. Approval of Tentative Tract 1;0.1_1 734: arantea s.bl e<t 1. the iPVrorat If PlannQd_QQVeI ORmeT1 - 0a,_SSO_10__--- _ - --- -_ a. Tell Conditional Use permit 1s ry'anced for a period of ootn(s) Jl tine the pWnning Cor Ssn Ln may add or Jel a to condi[i ohs or revol. the CenJltleldl DSe Permit ,n 1Te dCYPl apes 11 r,quired to obtnln the roll.. :ny signN 11,11 rnl Ly Vn r<M1as ers or namrs vbill navy a ....air or Ve .... ..lw ...... trail on or ..dace,[ to tnmr praaartY. In purchaslny the ngns facatee on tot . tract , I have r,ad Cne C.C. 5 F. algid n irlaJ [r [T snE toe - I5 s "el re5 to a nn tool reli,riicll c I., a Dvrpos or lTowmg qu [non [raffi, to gain access. Signed V. rloa s ar 51111 swlemdnt is to be filed by one developer won in, City prior to p copiney. x 6. "I" to approval and r e,dltJPo of the final mlp, or D,I., to les.Jwce of b,ildinq pe,mlls. OWn n subdivision nup is i role,,, w'131S,r ce. trflca t5on rr, J11 Jtlee ice so.olvis ltvrm. .. I'lll b, rr tn`.I to the It,; tr....I, of C nnnl[y F•vel uln„nl •,n 1<n slates ton JdeT,l tr .....I p<111br•1 I III D, C" Vlble of lell' -l"It n9 11-Ittots 9 rn [,.I Iv Lott '1 "It. S.ah dell,, of certilmalmn host M,e neon i ,Meby [L, 111.1.1 ).,1, It v. thin I,ly (60) days prior to the final e.so aVVroval to thv` c .` of t1.,. loh. d lvlslnn npp or l,sdlo,p of pernttl In IM1e last, of all .iris r,ILA,ntal prole. I,. x I. Prior to nl and r - r.l '( r.rrl [lu; n ,tu of 'he ,,rut rsp. Or P, o, to Ilse Istuanre b1 of vr•d. r V .II: , r .:J to rtrr leuhtrry alPnl LLc P. tVl ,rpr, .J r,ala'u.'I'll I., ,: Le.e 4. ., ,S - I..... o �r r. „i .[ 1,.: ,Ili .r.l LJ iro r � s 1' ru t ...... 'I.P fatI Olaal l.Olhe: [Lt.• ;I e II av : I .. 1 ::? fat net al la.a Lle r. 111: r[ O( a • u sir CS:r J�.r C.l, ll. Cr L,. urr tra •. J J, ..r nvC •IO rmJl ron, shall L• LiLU:Ir ree l S:.na Crl Ir [Ir C.". n.1 t�, .. ,,, , - rl , •ne II u. n[a lave nm liv lap ai..u. itnIS%Le I to i „r11 ai n(,t o iy ” unlr t tin [.t nlSr rr JS (a ..'r y a.teJ LY [• at I vlt is lrn OI'[[ - Pl .m �nrl f.: Slo: a � ;" 1 at a In;at JO,Cl ...... t Nc"v and ii "r.Ulg alv vrt 'Le JCS 1 pIVJ mn of W IIdal .t. Y' vat an.l . rrd, till 0( the m:V if Cln s.a..vrs u.g :o La 1,.re ldw� as er.:a I•hnes. RPP[:Ltrt Snn[t CuFiaCl ➢tc tvltnll.: UIy 19lUY [JR C0:;4IC:;CE NI III 111E FOLLOJIpG APPLICatif S - F. site x 1. Ift a. ;I]i —[ dull c U., le:v 1 .al i air .. _ IJ (es[ .t !OV[Crl NlijOrp hurldi.., C.d, a..rlr ce:.le -oa t e rncr ur :h:as mle• AIt oa I rr [ CUde .nJ doll nn.r Cl vc r rely bv. rtnn[:. -. .• r nine rdr Isimncz burll —1 y lal[5 for la"Ell i ti Lie c:dflrUC[i Jn• evleCn<C oil [C S..I IItI'd to n ill a 5[r l ct (r(. Chrr( ".., [ lalp Ipm �tc�m[' r'a[ICU .n rs aullJCle, t "`111 to .pie 11011 Of rerluu ed Lcr It n v. stu lr,. xl. Pu of m Iry 1 •r of J ]alI lint Permit for 1 ide¢ia] dr:rll mg en tl i) or arlJOruaJL [Ir, attl n9 um[ a her e.cta a n L a ::7 the arvpl ic.nt Sh lit pa/ C,1 Ltl hr J[t4 X50 yt ^v .:n .,r Ftt S,Ji fear, r ,,clad,. Lut nit Fer. Ve Hln l(ne,ru yji.,,F anJUSJ...a lcF`e5• SYS tom ' r La Ct h.` I'll pl J uilL llq y,r,p[ for a al or InJln trial tle.e ln: 1[ [r seJJlnO [ II 1 Jv:P tC,r[ncvr[a Lhell I.ay Le 114: eOt I.et at - r uld - 5'Jr lei` nal Ina al... puI r Le,, I.:, FC,t S /iC -1i L . , -.[ ie., Ur ya F p• V[r.n[ aaJ P: n'dt _X S. Stied aid rems ih, 11 be NanJJ by Ito 1,111din9 o(nrgl. x 6. Crrltrn9 en rt3 ""ll to [s �'az[r ole 11th fire retardant aeahl l enJ non - ol -,,I ra >. An tarn .r U.ol Hngs doll na,e o.e beldln9 eI,,atjed Ia n u9 the itr:.ct upjr.e d girth aLbJrdnal —if trim aro -J 1 dad LJIn o s .Lrre al nrgrr n. In,.4s em w g or plalll. �_ [. ProvlJe [halrl..... with Ile Emilirn 1. ildln9 Code IJr proper[, Ilne Clearances It'lS ering esq aria and fve- revtavec,;3 of pass tiny Lru leant s. i. [n:ang LeilJ mql t) vhall b 7..-S to [ ply .Itn r [nt Uurlrllnq a1r0 re901a[lOns (Vr tl.. rn.1 .l ^� u4<Lpr [LC Lellerng thall L•` Jel•OIrSLe J. J. Ea ittln] R.Me ditpn:al fart nry [4011 be rr roved. Ii11eJ "W re lopped [o "Ply rRh 11 1—John P11, }ml9 LoJC, d' it Unr(Orm Calldleg Cede. Pip oa -io 'J act Ila. 11. Lrminq -- x _ L trading o! lire SebJ1•a property shell to m mrlan[e 11th 01,I Un ✓mm Our 111r'r'J11�, CI LY Lrdrl Sny S.a'da", and Jc [.VI•J •Jr a.lrng Vrlttr[r t. Ln1 II' °I 1 plan zlnll ee ve5 to nt lal con rorn:Jnce ,. Ii, che llol. , 11-1 taal 9radicn plan. 2. A soils rrol shall be prevared by a Ile', State of Callfefnia A ied en9lnrer 11[uued DY the Pia to rx sett vo rrt, x ]. A -tj q,..b vrttuJra[ "I thatI be WCV. r cJ Lr A euSM1 fret enalnerr er 9eo109'zl r aWl , nan for 91 ad., Plan thug. Sthe (inzl grall, pl., shall be fnby:C[ to r a and approval by lnc 'hdirr•l Cox,RLrof JnJ she 11 bbe [ I Vrior to r c rinel u LJ rvrSionrm V r Is SUa n<e ( he.I,,, r,, Lr'rnr[ 1.I,IChvvr ra[Orn o! t S. AS a Cu Stun -Int wbJivr slon, the fit lomng rppu nm`na Othalls fin t. Su r, t' id.11 be heated and I, qe1 err Lem n^t a. agrer cne a ,e 1 vte Jrar ofc ra[rtil a rcu to. to tAU sa[iv (ac tion I the Omlmogna nJ •5efe Iar vision. n9 ell It ty Division. D. ,lpprnpr,at, Pa er:rpn[s. for Sate JISPO1al of JrJ lrrJ rin whir Lh.lt are [endd -`Lld ultn. o— aJJaernt I,,.- z. arc [o Lr 111111111,d .Ind L rJrJ [o [Le fob sla¢lon o! U.e Om id rng A" Safety Oivl von. [. u' -t i L. Jralwne ir,ertie, ,s. n.I1I aIY for d —iter1 or Prolrt[m P 4rrI:JI V il1u1 'A' lediz, re to h. 11 nt [JIIeJ Vrior to g Lrr rlJ brJ Tell""' u !Or CUn s, rut [tun uPdrr thy Wr:rl that r Ss(L ^SULJ rtt It. or on lri Lvtes [o, dr i r (10 1 a "1' r9. 1111u. 'or parcel relative to which a buhbhig pnnrit 15 *iLMn a rrq.rCS [e1:. r J. ;1101 graJln9 plans car each Porcel air to Le Sul.... tcJ to the Oorld rng rrJ Sa(rty Oroat'IGn r`( a aal I. limy "' n r in orrntal iPClo: [n r :um.o, of build ing pernn U. •n'Jav to Shat P. All 5 5 -I or nVd 0[145 IJdrathat dnr f lved(J) (ref in erti[el Ir••i 111x1 nnJ nl o1 ln• r 'oil that if r .r I neu fvP grad5:r4 Sep, d .r epdn cmplrt ron s '19 o.............. her . na ate he •ard.l 1 .r.,l n dart ml a.ill anipe[e rl In Lne Gf t1u` Cur lJ rrrg rr lrc ra 1. Iry ry rl inn lull he afllr ra to 9, rm irm;e pre ar"I and ulln Win 9ro.(n LO a Pmnt APPL 6 5„nuls aRer ger(um adn. CODIT 103 SlLtll CCtIL1CF pilF CIIGI UCf r11:IL pl_I SIOY Illfl CatrLIAKE Will ME FOLLONIIIG peJr_tL -I anU von acular ACCrss - __ 1. O.`JieSU'Its Shall be I'll by final enP of all in[erit, street righls- x a1 -eat and all n:c CV ary ..... ;,.1, ai "1.— On lire [r n[J tsar viva V. �. OtJ is aeon Shall be made d1 the f011wing rl9n ts- or -.ay on cne fell..,., —_ �.a_ additional feet oe Vineyard Avenue _ - JJ if Tonal feet nn Alrrow.-Route __ addrtlonal L•et a __ JL ]. ,Diner prope"Y line moles will be reeelred per City standards. 1. All n91'[s of vUri cu tar ingress to and e9res5 tree Shall ee dedW:<d y 11 fdllorr y S. Pe[ipre[al Ca1MPnt1 Shall be provided eC,U,,A .lC Cet{ (p all N1rC IS of er Pnaa To reads, 0.1,,51 or fertm9 J eat, a..J Ilia no[1[eJ on ll'e LaD Or Shall be r,,.rdld ...cer"It -1,, Lhe ua p. • _6. �egm [e pro+hlans shall ee note for the Ingr¢ss, egress and Internal • Ir "'.I'll [ruor•rn U :c- a. +.an prvrrvill [n used it, Jtl lv cry of 9GOJ4 to nor If the Droppz eJ by v nel s. % ]. prry rte Jr.l lrJ;[ e r n 'a S s for t s -la[ Sr trJ Uragt sirs ll O[ r ,;u titan a-, Al Ic Cv.r otedb, nail[CJ no V., final X B. .:11 ran nrj a ar s IT", vilnin ru[vre ri'bt- of.,Jy Ire In be n+rt,III or to pa Jel r :q'eJ If, toed p per City "g,"v.....•.lu i rent n IS. 9, (a• ni; tyr IS N. ¢a [eJ [ -LIrc s moo n [ in, CrtY 1. tons tr.r [ [,ill b-t•[ it enb including, but not IuoifeJ to. urn a r F_C. n[ ..rli. ill" Jpprm cuts, par4n s .r allSn tpr rcr Strre[z. y a ad -foct wlet eadica[e.l XJ. Consb ... ... lallur. mg , rrrJ inpraveu rts including, anti np[ Ism fed to. s —SI:.- al c. IREC ^'•n I llrl'IS CVEoliy Iibz'.11 afFER Vineyard % I % g X -- rrtn��- ��__Y-- -'L —I�_� Hd •Ise l.rtev Ian.;a [, pin) and matron no meter. 4. M1lar to any vork nelog PPrfomed to the _ call It PJ Jan public tilt[ -of -wily. fees City lug rnre� i off.... ina.dtrt�on [o ip snail De I'Sined Trans Ibe -o n nr tiler permit, .•- 'n•d. lJ� X S. slrept in.ravel pions ,roruvpd by [he City Engineer and Drepamd [y a """"'I'd Cl"' E111 -11 r spoil be rege,raJ, for all ST.," 1 J ..r Sitar in ....... -e or an er -r auai.nt phralII. Frva C nlr aiez 11"1 l ns sd it 11" rill Iccaticn or It mss ei ng utl li ey t., rrg:r- - -.ay. 6 pfrute O plCnp wrlr•d.,.1nd a r ..ht eaecutnl to the saenfacll- of IT, n- 1s,etomey, r;u1rIrI,,Ir, e: nD sputa r rr c, n :5.ap.Itr to JrJ1n9 of the nap or file nsnout of t'rld my :ur: ts..nc ucr X ], all sVr:et irprove-Cnts spell be installed to the satisfaction of IT, Cr to Er linter, pr SJr to oc<epancy. X 6. Davt+mr4 str rY rn9. rr;irg, traof2 ant sb eel ".7 signing Ill 11 DC Initallhl prr Vrr recuircv :n[s f [ne City Eng m . 9. lusting u;Y rood r,,,r r r ing .... hit ...... I shall r talon open for Iloff.t at .,11 Ir.rrl "ILl adr.lua It dl-1.b II ourinl [ n;trvC Ll nrr. A otn dr tilt i`•s 11 bn r mr*J lb Corot me cult or l[adinq mA pa rlr.g...r i[r I., ,I L- rr lu'er'L n n..il ptlpn of V., .bItruttlon to [ne sous4t[rnn lot 01 C,[y ErrS rn eee. 4 *tt0ro -10 % 16. Walk. Yl stall be or. died bet.ren public Sid,.,I[S and on -Site pede It, lan area I. X 11. train, Lr a,11 JrJ in a 9e rinrs Stoll not Cto Sldrv5155. Under SIJ evJI\ Jra ins Sn, 11 be insiolleJ to city iunJn n:3. 11. An energy JISSiWtpr Jnd]or erot ion [on lrol neJ 5nrP5 still Dr Inll Jl ofd to The iJ [isfx lmn of toe ❑fY frig urr..•r, R ill. enl of ;[rA SV1t.11 A letter of att e,rt enu of ilia vru9C rvno11 Iron [rte dc.nun-1n p o trey .r•ett sl.all CC re.lu lrCJ. F. Ord ln.,g _nil (I and (on [rill _X_ I. lie "ll .ill be rupomlble for cons VUctlon or all on drill Jg:• filth lLres regurnd try I,, city Engrn,,r. _,it, Z. Intt"Itllon drains x111 be re9vrrcd of the fcllorvrg iocdtsons; ]. Torn poPuh, prole[[ fells wl tern J ine rc <eJ a tl ad in9 unAnr 111 JJtional EIOOJ butt' n p, dl nnzand D�r`y So file Vrpvizrons of mat Dmlrto and UIyJOrd r nv¢c gn. DJ.s subject to d. A drainage Uunael ono /or flood In taltlon wail will hf rtoufreJ So ur o;ct fire structures tly Jl vet ling zlert wharf to :lire ts. or tI a saran train. X 5. Mloquate provisions spell De mode for sc""a ... ..J disposal or s Iface JrJ shale entering nib property Tian auJ at rut mCas. 6. letter of oz....a:ce from Jo•ms Ve[s runoff frm ie act proppr[y d.rors shall to repo fret •pe re o t tr l nn o pnvatf Plus,...... i tree [s reouir,n Stall be J2I.,,.l a major .a ter to cry lnp [YI'u tlr, 9 a ordin rolled of such al taro hein nti, era raCiai andt" loncl'JIcd Borth stem dud nrolleJ Sdr,Vmars a[ prooll line B. The following storm draln Shall be hlznlled to the vtJSfact ion of the Citr In in[..; _- 9. Prior to re[prrla [i on of the tap, a LrvaJ -SCJe nyJr oloti i[ end rlr la page tvJY fur lLP proJrct shall be su Gni ((vJ to Ilre city Engi neCr for v recut L Ut 1I It,,, Provld[• alt utility Services to each lot Inc, .11 ding Sanity rY sc.CVS. -Ell. Cl... ric PI,.er. gas, to l eplmne and [a Lle to levrilpn mnJ I 1. All ut it it"s vilFrn 11 1 1rrCl using rrt,lities along rajort6, terlals IP I unJrrground ' ury ln9 utlliints shall De prorised to the iPeC11 i[o [i an sI me r cP.npaoill and the illy Enlinecr. X 1. Dove inppr stall be rexponsl ble rot the relocotioo of slISting public IT l to IIts• az Islisirlod. x 5. Urmlolmr stall L, respond ble for the Ind la ton of sL'etl IilLt lug in a¢orddntc w1 tF Southern Wliforn is ftl non Corupany and CI IS sundards. x f. R.r;rr and fr i .` n/ 1!r1d 1G1 r n, Ccrnt1V nVeJ [r pCi n it r tlrorll[rut Lm ntro I TO'! .4111 D.n[r.a[ anJ ve N R`ayrkont or the - -- or 6m ppn a-dmd. A letter or cd:pliance from CC::D vrll be re.lmrtd p.nva], I—., r-ot Le<n "CIjrm f,— all utnittez and other Internlia d6:[. F""It -1 or tilt Anal .Jo .111 M arl ».ee to !n, no, L. r. :Cried /r0 tl n`l, and K. Gner.l Rrgn L_ 11p r•.t ::pr+ .,rl y_ --X. 1. Cunny Inn ottwrragrniret eill pi rerlulred .1 Witte': •a. Lil franc for: _n. ^�'.[v n.y: .aatr .nn�„jn r, �d yn er to tiwai¢e h'1 e- . itl L Ln Cu .rrJ ino Con tY Flood Control Diyb iCt _ D. Du.. X S. A cn,, of tht Gznwnlz• Conditions and Reztrictianz (C.C. a R.'sl one dr is I" o/ Irm rinntiun of the I:gmeaunery nstacia[Ian, sulJ ect to [ce,a „vel ,, [•r CrtY `1[torneY. shall Cx r.ca a ded rn [b [bri ap and a (o Vl y "J:Id" W t'e CIL,. x 3. 1,nal pore) and a ,act _,, yn,ll conlo rm to Citl ytanC[rdi and prpc oJUrit. _ d. A larcel :q mall bt 11clIded pri r to first phase zobdf,l,[.n to Wavv.: cr ,j— of un eWy-n iseJ pargl5. X S. rrror to r nr d, {ion. a (.,ti[? of Int entipn to Rind and /or join Diytr¢!t Ih Ill be Wart ,i,h roe City Council. TI, rr ln.0 n.y [..z l aeJ In 9ittrit, Fo�na Lion zA,ll he borne Cl Ire•dc:e Lptr s X 6. oll t pr1Iw «0 ,ad Into the Nr r 4r.fcu J l.na,.,l, ,:.a rn [. n.r „ce dtz [r¢4ry are ulrm m be anne 3. `,n hu ?!h'9 and 111111 t In 11; toms reau l red to be Ins rolled nn 6,bl to of [II, tra Ct area sh'al'l be continuously tnta mrf b, V., Ct:el o; rr until nccelRed by [be Ory and ...... d rota V.c Im.y,[eGt nu m[dnence Jiztr, Ct. 5 • ORDINANCE NO. 14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207 - 211 -28 ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE FROM A -1 TO R- 3 /P.D. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION l: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental • impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessors Parcel Numbers 207- 211 -28, approximately 8.5 acres in size and generally located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route, is hereby changed from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to R- 3 /P.D. (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development), SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shalom cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circilat ^_d in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1981, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 0 Il V • • 9 CITY OF RAICHO CL'C NMGA �oC%'CA.HC4 STAFF REPORT DATE: November 4, 1981 c n U T0: Members of the City Council and City Manager F � FROt4: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development 1977 BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 - LAWLOR A request for a change of zone from R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 20,000 for the development of Tentative Tract No. 10210 - APN 1061- 172 -03 Related Item: Tentative Tract No. 10210 ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 23, 1981, eId a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above zone change request. The Planning Commission, after reviewing staff's recommendation and conducting a public hearing, has adopted Resolution No. 81 -107 which recommends adoption of the above - described zone change. This zone change will allow the development of 33 single - family residences. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 81 -106 approving Tentative Tract Map No. 10210 and all conditions of approval related to that development. The approval of the Tentative Tract Map is contingent upon approval of the zone change by the City Council. Attached is a copy of the September 23, 1981 Planning Commission Staff Report which fully describes the zone change request. If the City Council concurs with the change of zone, two actions are required; 1) adoption of a Negative Declaration by minute action, and 2) approval of the Zone Change through adoption of the attached Ordinance. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice has been placed in the Daily Report newspaper advertising this as a public hearing and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries. Attached please find a copy of a letter from an adjacent property owner objecting to this project. In addition, at the Planning Commission public hearing, one person spoke in opposition to the proposed change of zone request. The Planning Commission felt that the proposed average lot size of 36,000 sq. ft. is appropriate for this site; however, cautioned the applicant that his subdivision to the north would require substantially larger lots. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 81 -01 and issuance of a Negative Oecparation. Director of Community Development ng commission Sta i� ion No. 81 -1 T. TMT — • ORDINANCE NO. 159 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1061- 172 -03 LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE AND ALMOND, FROM R -1 -14 ACRES TO R- 1- 20,000 SQUARE FEET. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION l: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessor Parcel Number 1061 - 172 -03, approximately 14 acres in size and generally located on the northwest corner of Sapphire and Almond, is hereby changed to R -1- 20,000 (single family residential on minimum 20,000 square foot lots). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of ge,noral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of November, 1981. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: r t1 � RESOLUTION NO. 81 -107 �.' A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -1 -14 ACRES TO R -1- 20,000 SQUARE FEET FOR 14 ACRES LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE AND ALMOND - APN 1061 - 172 -03. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of July, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of September, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code, SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses per- mitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 23, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of September, 1981, Zone Change No. 81 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 81 -01. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planninq Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981. PLANKING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a, C I C Resolution No. 81 -107 Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of September, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Dahl, Rempel, Tolstoy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: King • :7 • • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 23, 1981 TO: MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner GUC 1MpY G� c >. 2 i n 4; C > 1977 I SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 - LAWLOR A request for a change of zone from R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 20,000 sq. ft. for the development of Tentative Tract No. 10210 - APN 200 - 061 -12, 200- 051 -06, and 1061- 172 -03 Related Item: Tentative Tract No. 10210 ABSTRACT: A change of zone from R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 20,000 sq, ft. lots is requested for a portion of land within the proposed Tentative Tract No. 10210. If the Commission made a favorable recommendation on the approval of Tentative Tract No. 10210, then it would be appropriate to recommend a change of zone for this portion of property to the City Council. BAC&GROU110: A change of zone is only for a small portion of the project site and is generally located in the southeast quadrant of the project site (Exhibit "A "), The project site is presently vacant and undeveloped and is General Planned as Hillside Residential. The Hillside Residential category of the General Plan indicates that density shall not exceed more than 2 units per acre. The request for change of zone can be found consistent with the General Plan based upon its unit density and based upon the Commission's determination that the proposed density would conform to the policies and goals of the Hillside Residential category. This change of zone will also require the finding of no significant adverse iwpacts upon the environment and the recommendation of issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. If the Commission found the proposed den- sity of Tract No. 10210 acceptable and consistent with the General Plan, then it is recoxcended that the Commission recommend issuance of a Negative Dec- laration. CORRES ?�;IOEi;f.'c: A notice of public hearing was posted in the newspaper and notices mere mailed to surrounding property owners. A written letter of ob- jection was submitted by Charles E. Morgan and is attached for your review. Mr. Morgan also provided public testimony at the meeting of August 12, 1981. 1G< Staff Report • ZC 81 -01 (TT 10210) -2- September 23, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive all public input and comment. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, if the Commission finds the zone change consistent with the General Plan and City policies, a Resolution is attached for your review and consideration which recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Zone Change No. 81 -01 to the City Council. Respectfully ubmittted, JA VAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:MV:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Letter from Mr. Morgan • Resolution • � tcl0 0 I 41 fi•� ��R -1-2om Fp No NhTivNA rb EST � I • �S ZONE CHAN&z.; St•-0I eA \010p 51h61B �;1�116'j R-I -l2Yge —L MEET R -1-20m CITY OF RANCHO CCCANIO\GA PLANNING DIVISION v� N0IZTI 1 ITI:.�1: ZDNE GHAN�� Nf7. 8l-nl TITLE LOATtOtA_MAP EXHIBIT : SCALE T'S. G I��7 - Alts Loma, Ga 91701 _ a:ncho Qlcponga P1 a.ning b aaisaian Auggaat 9, In3l . . 9320 Esasllne Avenue ..... __.. .. ...._...'_.. ..__.......___.___. .._�:._. - :iaieha Oucaron�a Rs: ];virn.ertal sOaessneAt ' and tentative tract 10211 •�`' 'n•rtronmental easess� cat ... and zone chance ho. Genel smm: Lawlo r ... I winh to formally object to &,a density of tha rro, -sed tract 10210, .•,i•�::..- ...•',a..:�.: Zia area in auestion..is part of the hillside area of Alta Loma and is not caiadu clve to one -half acre Farces, I now refer specifically to the arplicgticns for rubdi.1 ision and zone c1ian. a ror 45 acres recrea�.ting il!e Souti :ern portion of tract 1C210. Portiora of the area are quite atasc id nct realty fagsgble tut!din artlailarly lots 32, 13, a, i.5, and 56. ^ In orier to ' build to this greq, tsasivi c.rtting Ind fill ink •:oui: have to be !Ore V.i t`.s stn`` -lli`y 0! t:a terrain is in que^.ticn sinae it is imoedlataly . gija ^St to tilt Peult lice. Squally tmrortert is the esthetic bagu N, of the hilloids and roantgin- ous area. Ara we to raplaa. the natural tsrraia with d=se raoftons7 I do nat object to p:. Zraas, only to the dnaity of that progr ±as. Xy • le. ^.d, adj is .•a to the !,at, is zoned rl -12 acres. ']ve land adtgc^.ar a °e':o r'- .. east to ._e9:: -l. TO the lest is Additloa - al . -1 ra :; an: vaca.•it _. . .. -. Ln cal :tnZ `c t: -a ls. ". r.;x era izeedist'ad T aJ; cent the �sutj act ---- �z.� -. -- rar:il, I feu.^.': :hit the c- ncvsus !a teat the area, linen it to develmr9d, :h d be in ngrcils rc lees thnn, 2 gcris, tae to the ngt.vre of t:a land, :he oltor iwniliately gdjac At tc the '.feat indicated that hta elan wqa to enpiregr hie land for 3 ac ri pgra al wi th to ih a' 2L c Glyn tea ,?rve to '.he Soath anal 2 oars parcels in the cleared irga to the 1 -ort %. ?ne land o:r..sr tc '.ho ibcth 1,1e indi:�ted !hqt .,grc,lo of 2 acre minimum zruu'! he deair•, :lq, bnt has no ilmedigte .;lens for dgvelorient. So, we have aurrouudl lend cavern rat:: 2 acre rircel thin::in: , bna 1! aeac reisona_11 to :lis+one -Jail acro zani:_ in ti:e middle o: tills? ?ur• er, if the are, is • to ' a reluiat d, ti:e 3wr lr If '119 s,tlict oarc, n .l Jthan res.ihatt % trio• •ear .with ore -!tall aero lmta tai' c an••roxinntely three -.0 irt'r scrz lc is oa ` ,�.� gnnlicition, thereby incregsire t;n dnna'ty atill furthsr. . -2- 3e: 3nvt r. m, -r -r, al aa3eesrop't: ad tsmt,aUvi tract 10213 • Environsentil sseesseant and zone chrn�a No. 31-31 Lawlor In siditim, `.hart orticn of tract 10210 not ':etrZ ronsidared at this time, co'., i later he s•.,bdividsd into cnr, -h•s1f acre parcels numtsrtng over 2G0. Can Coe city pro>ide '1 a services necessary for a develop-.ant of this size with one means of access, Sar „hire street? •''The addi Hon of :o unite in this area moll add eonnai_ately 73 -mre val:icla3 Fer day dawn 3 ac nhi re at- -peat, which is already to sae. rul or traffic. 'Th st-to a xirtmum of 150 additional vehicles per day at the i^tersectio . of Saorhire and Alsund. • In reirtion to drsin,ge, the vr.nlicnt ststao in his reneral notes, itsm 10, that 'it is en Fosei to drain the lots to the street as .uw. as ressibla'. '�.rr m thst volume of wntor flowi.:g do-in an 3 end 105 rrs�le re3c?.ad : =!A street, it will rotss havoc with t:: ^-e land on the south side of Aisad, sines ;lzond is :troroa,:l to to pavad only l:alf- Y.3t1 aitl: no c3rb3 Irl gu oars on the S -,ut:: Stdo. 1 firthar object to t-• ^-a 20' squestrian easement or. the 3a3tarn to_. ^ -d,ry of tie .arael I do not of tact t: L•c r3 coonl e, tut I do o Sect to the cobrcyoloa and off -road vnr.icies -site moll aursly welco�e tilts scoeaa to ti:e .ountain area. A aiziatle r,robira already . e:cdsta Atii this ;•mo of tre3 ^ +s air. g. For aucn an eseoert to be fatessle, i. stuli hevv to be faccad end r9eilated in nano vannir in to re3trict•It to hors, ^w- loamy. 'Ma fore�ing obi :ctior.a and coaontz re ^resent not only ay thinidnr ._._ -_. ____• .. Cart ih3t of the adjacent lad oweore ad a goodly r..r. ber of residents in the lm7edlate area. l/ ee Cisrlou i, it pan P+f.' rNr •� (-4 t 'ti 'M. . r r1 W fxw 4 a: +r 1 �,5,•• Rh a 1Ke �.4avµYY �. ..<w/M: Yw T-,e. a. .... u... •w.. �.. u•�......�r.1..wra -r .•H�/`Y.0 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -106 C A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0, 10210 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10210, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lawlor Enterprises, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as approximately 46 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Sapphire and Almond and being divided for single family use into 37 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on September 23, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CCucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the fallowing findings • in regard Co Tentative Tract No. 10210 and the Map thereof: C (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; - - - - - - -- (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (r-) The site is physically suitable for the type of develop- ment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. • Resolution No. 81 -106 Pane 2 C (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the • environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION' 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10210, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All necessary easements for cross lot drainage shall be shown on final map and grading plan. 2. All requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District such as, but not limited to, fifty foot clearance of flamable material around all units, fire retardant building materials, appropriate water supply and fire lane to Turquoise, shall be met. In the removal of flammable material, inflammable material should be planted. 3. Construction of a new forest service road shall be done in conformance with conditions set forth by the Forest Service. 4. Full compliance with the State Alquist - Priolo Act is required for construction and placement of dwellings. j5. Full compliance with the Cucamonga County Water District for construction of the water system, is required. 6. The forest service easement shall be extended to the eastern edge of the property, north and adjacent to this tract. 1. Equestrian access to open spaces shall be provided where feasible. 8. The applicant shall work with the utility companies having easements over the subject property, to develop the easement areas for useable open space, such as an equestrian staging area. A detailed plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to recordation of map. ENGINEERING DIVISION! 9. Installation of an adequate concrete lined interceptor drain across the southeasterly project area as shown on the tentative map shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, The drain shall be extended south- westerly to connect to the existing Almond interceptor drain. The storm drain fees for the project shall be credited towards the cost of this drain. I7' Resolution No. JI -106 Pag^ 3 C 10. All required on -site and off -site easement for the drain • shall be dedicated to the City. The easement shall be extended northeasterly along the Edison easement line to the easterlymost tract boundary. 11. A flood protection berm and /or a channel shall be pro- vided along the north lot lines of lots 16, 17, 18, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34, diverting storm runoff to a safe disposal area. 12. Construction of Almond Street improvements with curb, gutter, 26' wide asphalt concrete pavement, A.C. berm along south side, and street lights within a dedicated easement shall be required from the east tract boundary to Sapphire Street. 13. Emergency access road per Foothill Fire District's requirements shall be provided along Almond Street to Turquoise Street. 14. All conditions contained in the letter by the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, referenced 5460 Schulhof aated Jun 22, 1981 shall be complied with. The existing Big Tree Road shall be Cvacated prior, to recordation of the map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981. • PLANNING C0�'.MISSION OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ng Camm15SIon 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca�onga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reqularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of September, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: 4 I* Resola[ ion No. 61 -106 Pace 4 AYES: COtPIISSIONERS: Sceranka, Dahl, Rempel NOES: CommISSIONERS: Tolstoy ABSENT: CO'r'.MISSIONERS: None ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS: King 1�3 .f if DEPA'Arr {:;T OF CmltturirY DEVII01,11,, STAS;IIR0 (OLIO...... s.eTect: Tentative Tract fW_10210 Applicant: LAWLOR -- Location: LPtri rE_ontl _t\linpn;l Tnoie luois mock, are tt:dl!'c z 4VLICA:IT SALL CC'CACt Tr: P_.' pLI51 Cl !Cq [C'^LIq[KF Vl ill plf IOLIOV UIG m:alnods: - G';_._ A. Site p�.e lnn.e_a t IntEhenVlanneng 0ivicr.n in accordance llunl the Wmed pereln, plans an file _.2. Dev rsed viz "Ian aroval . s °I n .lo.a In "rzur[Shall b.. ill. 9 -11 co5dii[lon s o r E u'ld, '9 p ri [z r mmn9 prvl i ^ Dr ir o wnce or i this —X J. the r2cmrg fOrmmnceua 5[ All ac ^ot wa t ve compliance with all section, of A" of B . n9 Peon: is, „rner aVvh<a ble City Ordinances rtes at A. The develeper ""11 prd.l J.• dal elet' with adequate Sldelold area for Recrea udn vehicle I'—;, nc to ci" Standards. S. Trash rerepta cle areas shall be eneloeed by a 6 foot high III, Inner wall with Arobz t,.CorJ sates :,r meant [r City s ore'. L.-I,cn :hall ils, to aPO1.:al by inch am le.rn fug Br.ns ¢n. De samele of the not ma oriel shall E sv4nitted to the Plaumn9 Bivislon for r v ev and a,u.,al prior La IStua of building pellitz. All roof apYurtenmces. including in[egnted, snr zl a:U frov r n air aril [loners, Shall be architecturally and Street; as require- stn a "tl The Soon) Du /lore, Lo.rl adjaan[ Droperb e3 . q e_ ty is, Planning and b.ild,sA Oivl:i ant. x S. P13n1 to any use or t,, Irri )act site or Du vners do ti yr ty being curled .'al th reon all Corm Ito,, n, ..iU,O,aI <pn [a lr:.,.J Drrp In MaII """action n li, Cs. ,•r o ar. .:.rp Bevel...... 1. be hrnlaeLe:l to 9. This approrai shall boro.o null and ®lo a1 build in9 Peceits are got issued for this Plue" wrtM" one rear Le•a tre date of Project epprnval. 10. As A CoMgignal use pnmit, this Prot act shall teem.. n „II .r vp l,l in "sa .�DNOI ]li zaee =ale oV r•a t` cf aPPrp,al, nn i... Perin n -'A issued or It. A d:•tJIIrJ Igniting plan sow 11 be in-baited to and approved by the planning bir"Urb pro, to SSUrnr.e of burl Jrng PPrn113. Suit pldrl Shall indl[Jle Style. Illrnlna tor. In ...... he r ge.[ ald metro, of ",.,Id r „g, M. bgDb ng stall aJlcr,I, affect ......It Groper U et. 12. All s.immrng POOIS. installed at the time df Initial dereloproere [hall be B. Solar Erated. ll. lecturilsd Bedestri Jn I.Thwys acres' ci rCC la[lon si sl CS Mal) De provided I nrov;nou[ the U... 10Y'e•rt to C rfnCC, Crrll"g3 xltn open tpafet acrd factual Unel utn • 1 • Pcoject� %TR 10210 14. All trash pick up shall be for Individual "Alts with ill recap LicleI Shielded frpT public view, if lip (entrallEed tra3h receptaGlei Jre prnwrJed. 15. Standard paten n rr pqm she 11 be I'bmltted 10 and approved by the CRy Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy o! Me first on”. 16. All builtlmp•s wr.ben end IndlVldual units shill be Identlf led In A clear and corn "Se a:anner, Including proper illunieab o —,Y_ 12. Solid care exterior doors, security dead Eet[s and Iocks Mall be Installed on each unit In This project. x I8. Security devices sells as window locks shall be Installed on each Unit 19. All units xlthin 'hit dove lopnent shall be proplumbed to be adapted 'Or A solar rater beating unit. 20. Energy Conserving building asateriais and appliances are 1e9ulred to be reno.porat red Into this project to include Inch things as but net it 'led to eced consumption eyhower heads, better grade of Insulation, double paned wa ee"'. 4beneed ov hangs, pllo [l ova appliances, etc. 21. This development Shall provide in option to hone buyers to purchase • Solar w her heating unit. x 22. Erergency secondary access shill be faction or the Poetn i It Eire protect on Bas[rf Ct this trace [o Me uHS- x 23. Local and Matter Planned Equestrian Trail, Ohall be Prgvlded in,.,, ut the tract ir. accordance with the Erluel[r im Trall plan. A Jr'J IIeJ e:ures[r ian and l"'re l lan r"o, ui,at in9 xiJ [AS, n sl opeS, physical conditlnns, fencing La d iui I.dl[. land. ahcordd nby SwitA ^(i City pd uci Sri nn [rail Iran:, rid SM1a l V records bon of the final orep. by the City Planner prior to approval and �^ 2e. tr Ct Shrill / equestrian Or i.,I to a maintenance district for m intpnan,. e/ eguev tri ct [rails. e Street "'I'll SM 11 be reel owed and appravetl by the City planner, In JC[OrdenCe n th the adoptca Street Bening Policy, prior to apm'ovJl and ra•corin tips of [be fine] map. X 16. If this develoaanent Intends to restrict equestrian o onirul related uses "d spbel tic ll" or pr'onrbl[ them entirely, tire. a copy or The C C 6 le, at be s,:mll tied to acrd reri..Ad DY ere otr Nacre, nr rnr to sly ✓o vat of anal map. 21. This prof e Mall all provide ren. In percent or affordable housing and jour Arllt nfnrnanCP with a r01 Plan houiln9 policies and the tit, lnq ie,” deed M in the G ostn rMnag.*int OrO inane. Arf Y cur [ erket rates, rents and median cliche Lill tY Shall ut he floe O( co.Strut[ten of the (rOjlC[. LS and nsdil [o sus, Sna,l,At pproved LY Me fttY planner prior to J,,i ce of buil O tog pe, its. Park In 1YrM CVIar A_rce R_ 1. All partbig lot landuaped ISl ands anal] base a miv."m Outside dinension of 5' and chili Con tern in W calk adjacent to wr'klug stall. 2, parking lot trees shall be a wimrrun 15 gal do .... • 1. All tra -way aisle .mans snall he a olon. of 36 beet wide. t. 1111311[1 all", ho II be pre"JIJ, allotenance free and clear, a minlem. of .a feet + as 111 then, daring mnstreetlon in accordance Ith ljatJnll F,,, .1,.1X1 .,..a i r.. -nit. 5- All young states ,nail be sauhle ,tIlead. 6. All units ,roil to prw%1d,1 wath auto. -atlC 911 ra tie door opoeer s. J. Cc,lgnated v,v of yarl log areas shall be turf block N. S. the Co,erJnci, Ca,dxi and 'nei1.,c110ns ,Tall restrict the Storage of recrea Clonal of n.<les nn It., Site unless [afy are She Dr: nC,p le Sa a.Cr of tree Sp Ortatlnn Icr We tosser. _ 9. Ma parsing Shall Or Peraitted within the interior circulation n W 11e other an n eh,lg:u Sitar pa: alnl a Cave+.ur[,, Cala1. and 1.11.111 ail re da•rlue 11 t, lase as of 11, 1L and l nl tied to We e11, Pln .e:,.9 i5 Division Dr,a to issuance of ..a+IEiag yen nl i,. C. labd,e frog X 1. A de I IIN 1 and, <ape and k I r 9 ti on plan shall be suto.ittud to and approved by the flan -., 91u,.on prior to the issuance of buddies, Permit,. X 2. E.i,ting trek v 11 br re Ted wnefever posibll. A master plan of Lg m9 t.,-,r �Ire a Iacat ifs. s and C,,l 5'1.111 be t St., Eve::, e•. Sal L' plan shall take into a We in grdr., I. — [r.: : In fe reu mad, vmaling lethnas. anat wrerx n Sfe,.1 will [ plonll,l rear ..place.o -, of 1Iwe,IJ t•1f,. The plan .1 I.Ired to be s.L`.Ltaa L aed opprnael of the Planning Division prior CO apnii or the anal gnung plan. �j X 1 Street trees. a mm i of IS gallon site or larger, shall be irsealled In is h,1iace slid thin .` y[c, Plan of Street trees for We City of R.m.Tp - Cau-ho,a ani ,Call to pl.mt,d a, a of every 10` on int,, Ior Street, and 20' on eaterlor Streets. a ve,Age - _ A. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, tow,risad of the folle'+ia5 Siael. shall to prov.J'a within the devel.launt: }D: -W Wa Or larger, 70:-15 gallon, and 111:-5 gall an, X S. Alt lanastaced areas shall be maintained in A Maltby IM thriving cpn- alien, free frGn weed,, crash, and debris. X 6. All slol'e bless Sn ell us Sol (51 feet in vertltdl helght aM of 5:1 or ,,cI,nr tic: hall aAl be Iand;cajnd and i ri,ItaJ i ordlnce .,In slope plinth) fNm -nu of rn• City of Rancho Cuca^'onga. Such Sit" planting hall Include Cut not be I l-A to rooted g curd Cover and appfopna :e Sprat, art tree,. all Such Planting and i ;anon snail be euntlnuenily to i a health, a,,J uriving conl,l,Sn by too developer until each usal a told all o-coyrea by We purer. peas, td .el ea v.lg -, lo, tMie unto, a ylaaan of the stoics tbalt tr so Plelea lYt I's planning Starr to ae[e" ne that It It 1n Sd [, Sf dC [u rY Pond.[.... a X 7. f,ll Pa ff .,dY S, afro areas, and landtca ping shall to full, and ioWt ed by A :so.... ion or other room accepw Wr to the Call. SnPh proof of m -t —rce mall be seam M1tmd to the Ca ty prior so ul.anae of but Wing perm.1i 6. the frost yard Iahmaping, and An appropriate irrigation system. Shan be los,i m Wf nevemnf, In a«afdance with sulmitted plant. P• ^. TT 10211 _x 9. the final da SIgm of the Perisctrr far +.a r5. w+tly, landsuptng anti stdf- w111 ,haft be Included to the n u ed I,m.dspafe Plan, and shall to ,ubl"t to SlInoval by the Planning NH wan. W. A mmm,wa of t of the trees Planted vilbl. the project. ,hall be leeu:an Ill. trcez. 11. Sreeial landscape feature[ such at mounding, alluvial tack, ,pet Men sin n Ini —uh, S.d—walss (bxh ver n Cal and nonaonaI th lei :el and Intensified 1,J... flog, IS re,llrej along X I. Any Signs proposed for this develdpnent shall bf Oligned In confonance u111 tba Co,lill -ilive Sign Oldlnance and SIWI require r1 and app.onl h1 use Planning 01vl,it. into, to in, a llat,,. of such syn;Ew A un.fur S'no uro9ran for Sri, Jevel.,r,ht Slnll be so:a ^ .sea to the Plan inq O,r , (or, their review and JpVrnval Pr' or to Issuance Of 0•nld Lag Pe .nl tt. 9. The sign, indicated on the 5utmltted plant are not SV,h.uad with this -- aPinoval and will require Separate sign review and approval. E. aft"ilinnal Appaovals_peij,' ed L Oeveler—ot Review shall be acee,111ffd prior to the Issuance of a Building permit. 2. Owelopnfnt Review shall be accomplished Prior to recordation of the final Snminis'nn nip. _X t. Ar.val of ` Utive TrdCt pd. 1 0210 th iS 9raet,o tthjer, to e dpuroaal dr pp _Zane.. Change .Sln._81= Q1�--- --- - - - - - -_ A, This Coodkt,onal 11" Permit is granted toe a period of raanth(s) a, whKh IMP the Planning Coma155 ion aIY add or delete Cond+b Ons or rev Oke the CunJiti.nal use Pd,mi4 _X 5. ate developer 1s requ tred W obtain the following ,lined statement by pnrrnalers or homes nW Cb nave a private car public elaIII1 do trail On or adJale., to their propartY. In Dlrchasing the Mme located on Lot , Tract oft __ _ I have 11111-ON, C.C. 6 F. 'I and ndtri [and lndtiaid lot _ o ii tg u n Rj Pct to a autdal rM ipropl [ for the purpose ofliwin e9uv,lnan tral etc [o gain dinte". livened Purchase( Said statement 1s t0 be filed of the developer with the City Prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approval and recordation or the final undo. on prior to issuance of loal,tin9 plrnils, when no Subdivision east is Involved, written cfrtifleatton from all dffe,111 School Oi,ieacu, Shall be Sor, tted to I,, Cepa.0 eat or Ct, "'nity V.v IofneftL 1.h1Ch States that ade Site ,abeol ra1111t1I[ I,. or sill be capable Of accsi a.data ny Stud —t1 9enfra1o1 by "Is P,O,ct. ech letter 0f 111tlricatien null Lave been i , l w, WC Sannal ills 1. ,at nttln JIAtY 6n) days prior to she final :nap approval 1n use t or use So11- uw.un h or nsuante of P' ants In We tit. of all other reitdentwl yaw "111. a W X g. friar to Approval and recoreylian of the final map, or prior to the issuance of Iwil dl rig pe•,n, [< Jrtn no rz.A it I ... laid. written <ertlficatinn from (I.a tflrc trE .al,r Jittr¢t. toils le.•twte aml,l 1-id water Laltuet a e or rats to .... lame to carve tun prepoled Vroject. Shall be subO,t U•d to lore Dewar Teem dl C.,..A i ly Elie l o;..ot. Such lc tier I nave L„n i -,a 4Y the .ate, A.uncl cart nw tl,ty I63) days p ^or to final nap apprord i the <JSe of W:.:iv dal nn a mttuaMt de Yetm,ta in The < oil all ntne,n o,d. nt ql Yraltc ti. Iar> :tilt .,..a scat.[ tan% bciM1lut alle.ablt or Ine Ants L.a f••ppaal later (a Vol tdard and the City. welct<'n [ertlliw btu of aca•V UG,h [y, mclud,n9.1I suCDOrttve Info,,.at spur shalt 0e at•ta anvJ And cairn ttN [a IN City. X e. shat .,,,.a.% !tall LeconK null And moll if the tentative subdivision cap ' not ar,ru.ed s,d recarlca or ovlldlnq ptmlu issued .nn n, alp t Involved, IA ... I... I +e ICI noutht frbo the a val of this prolettt unless An ut,a,odn has b.•,n granted by the planning Commaitacn. X 9. This subdvision wa a not tu:mttted ai a Vasil development atkege and it rdpulrN to r appl yfor a paint rating relative to the d.Sign aecliun or the Wowtn :• •..t drdvr. a Nivr ba t,Aal approval A,.I recordation of the map if ttea sunduulon is doing to be developed as tract Ames. APPLICRIT SNAIL CONTACT lNS BIN111,G DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING EM IT IONS: F. Slte OaAOpvent X 1. Ine applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, DAM— bla<naOl Cad Caae. Unt FOm Plummolog Code. Datl anal Electric Cade, ana all other Applicable Codes and ordinances in effect at the one Of Issuance or soletive Dermlts. X 2. Prior to issuance of Guildinq Permit' for ambustlble [odttr,scbiad. evldl.cl _ shall Le Sat11tted V. the football Di Seriet Fire Chief that tengorary meter s hoe 1Drotec bon pr. Los. Ia aw l l aide, pend 1.9 cnmDl etten of reeAub'ed X 3. Prior td the Issance of A building amlt for • her rtllden tl ki Meiling urit(s) or major additicn to An existing s it(s)• the Applicant 111111 Day draeldcren[ ices at the established rate. Such fees may include. but not be limited tc: City Deauufic.Xaen fee. Yard Fee, 01lna9e Fee. Systems Deweloiment fee. Purrit and Plan Cracking Fees, and School Fees. A. Forfar to the issuance of a building permit for A rev commercial or inddatrNl deyelopment or addition to an existing development• the applicant shall pay de,eln;n:ent reel at lee [11.11slued Ate. Such feet way Trotted,. bit not be limited to: Systems Develop.. -.ent fee. Drainage fee. Permit and Plan ChecUna fees. _X S. Street Addresses shalt be provided by the Welding officili. �(6. as llln9 units amll be x........ wan tare relard.At of aerial and non - <om] a stlLle fool material. 2. All cdrnrr d.ellong& Shall hive the Wilding elevation racing the Street upYmid wins .em bonat wad tern around wmaoas one mod siding or plant• On, wtere appropriate. proje ^io, TT 10210 N. t.a_elny 1. Craning of the subject property shall be In accordance itla the Unifom building Code, City Ga+diog Standards and 6CCepted gnomg sfaelieet. In* final O,aaing plan shall be In substantial conformance with the Approved <Onceyw +l yraaing plan. [a i ttlnq St •u<(vros 1. Provide comPliIII with Ine uniform lutldilp Code fee pr-party line clearances marshalling use. are. and fare.m,iitivenesS of existing buildings. 2, Existing amildanq(tl shall be made le Comply dU current Dullal ml and Ien ....gut at io +s for the amended use or the tau it d in9 shall be demolished. 3. Eaialin. serve disposal beilataef shot) W rtaaved, filled .ne /or capped to [amply wh[n [be Unifore Pls,,banl Cade. And Obi Farw lull Sang Code. • • X Z. A soils report shalt be prepared by A gugtfied engineer licensed by the Slate of California to perform such work. X 1. A 11.111lcal report [mil be Drc ,led by A ouelifted engineer or geologist and sutmilled at the tine of application For grading plan check. X e. The final grading plan Shall be subject to review and Approval by the Grading Committee aria Shall be derOleted prior to recordation of the (IN) subdivision map or Issuance of building mosmil wMcnever [hart fvit. X S. As A Custer -lot subdivision• the following rteuiremeats shalt he Get: A. Surety shall be p ilatl and An agreement eae<aled. gnarl nleeinq Camplellm. oa all poi -site draiN9e facilities nru•i vary for denshsr inq all Do[als, to the satisfaction of Ltu Guildinq and Safety Uivlaian. b. Appropriate easements, for safe dls pool of drainage water that a re conducted unto o r aafacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded tO the Satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. c. On -Site drainage Improvements. necessary for dev+terinq or protecting the subJlvided properties, are to be Installed prior Sm issbnce of building permits far construction upon any parcel that navy be subject lo, or contraLutes to. d1lina9, flaws entering, leaving or million a parcel relative to which a building permit Is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be sutmisted to the (bulldrng and Safety Division far IPP.oval Prior to issuance of building permits. (This boy be an an Incremental or cwaposile basis.) e. All 11oVe banes to e.[eis or Five (s) f,et in .e. tidal height And of 5:1 or grater Slope Shall be seeded with native grasses app„ mmptelion Of groi nsn9 0 other alternative method of a enrol 9nll be mnmleledr too the Satisfaction of the Building Official. IrnyatmA shall Le V,.video to germinate tAd seta and maantal. growth to A Point 6 months after gemination. hMICkHT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINCERIHG DIVISION FOR (OiPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWHIG CONDITIONS: 1. Oedlcalm and Yellicular Access _][ 1, Gediealioni shall be made by final ap of all interior street rlghts- ef- ay and all nett scary easeeeati AS IM.A Or the tentative nap. _X 2. @elation shall be aide of the following righlf -of -.ray on the following at, a ets: 33 +dditt..11 flat on Almond St. additional feet ve —_- -- , add ... ne., a,et o _ 3. Cornet property lane radial will Ge 1e9ulred 11, City standards. a. All rights of vehicular Ingress to and egress if= shalt be dedicated at fellows: _ S. Red iprxal ....... is stall be provided ensuring access to it Parcels over private roads• drives. or parking areas, and shall be noticed on the ap or shall be recorded concurrent with %he map. • • C. prior to any work being prr(o rmN to the publl[ right- of -.my, fees ,� a. al...... ISlcns Stall be mace for the Inglns, ..... and Internal Cir:ula [vin Of any [rut.[ .he .1:Cn v:ll b• V... for delivery Df ... d5 to Strait . improvement plan' 'Ph"I” by the City Engineer and prepared ITI,OOy or rn [L: ,,,. r..uan Of the Drpp9sA business. x ). Drlvate dr-,,Ojr e.. -•, r [ru Ic[ Jr una le Shalt be require, plans and profiles shall vet.. na lowtscn c. all ealsta ng utility and shall to ]e hnu tr, w c;t:u,5aa a Rnel nap, X 6. x s. All e.I'tinj eall In" L: 1.- r. mre r:.h l- or -Ver, a to be f the C,ty [minter and Ice City �ttu,rh,. 9olranteeiry Cp: pietion Gu ''1'11..11 o to or f I :n.:.0 .1 a e rip so Ole [n gl boor's r,c. l..n.Its. 9. Ud1,1.IS r.r [ sl -,l .. I.r • tj i, u hall to Croft [U td tM City all Street improv,:ents shall be Installed to the Sa lisf¢liun of the -h-1 vet -auk n „n_ r ,..,_r. p Iv,i1b .:.ern;. + _x a. J. Svr_et Innror_nrnn A. X Emistin9 hit, fwd re9nrnng free ..vunion ...... remain opm for renal. ope. f L C ... lr.mt (.13 ,,.,t mcIDJing, Gnt not limited ter c avn Ggnvt shall be . rrt Ca co rcr Ins cc:[gaf y,ad:., trees and, gr[rPf[ e_[. 1= - r[ I .al k5 1 °.'n`er'd` 'on one snide on1��Z, on i Zrhdl,. �SldeWaI _Y 2. n n .. ngLLdr -,r, vy Shall Ce :.. ntr„UCd for all hat L'ec OOO S1r -I,. X !. Constr:rat the following • s ind ufp,u,o,.nes r,luding. Gut not limited lo: z.f fS rER • ^1T. SI FE[T rlNE ltd lFF p:: T. At,' tP: , 0`:ERI RY E6 19, ono O111FR Almond X X X ••r'n X J •Includes 1Cndsoping and I nytiav on peter. — X 4. prior to any work being prr(o rmN to the publl[ right- of -.my, fees Shall he pa 1. aN an ant par ., stall be obtained Irvin the City [ngirear's orate, in IJJf[ion to hey chef permits required. x S. Strait . improvement plan' 'Ph"I” by the City Engineer and prepared by a Rldiitemd Civil [,.Yon mall to roily red, ter all sure[ rt inprw[ +,ent5. cnor to : v of , ,mint mmit. [Swl plans and profiles shall vet.. na lowtscn c. all ealsta ng utility IarilIt'. ntnm Ins r:gu[ -oi -nay, X 6. ew.ety shall be posted o-J a a.jre other, rcuted to the satisf,ctlOh f the C,ty [minter and Ice City �ttu,rh,. 9olranteeiry Cp: pietion of Ins 1.bl :C In::r aft err. [S. I,v,r to re crl:ng of the nap or thl' wsuarse of of 101.9 or .:s. wlauevu� v.. -s firs[. X ). all Street improv,:ents shall be Installed to the Sa lisf¢liun of the City Coginerf. Or iof to cccut,ncy. + _x a. parem ho sin ping, markin 1, tar lit and street name vgnlny shall be inswll1d per the requim-rnts Of the CIL, Engineer. 9. Emistin9 hit, fwd re9nrnng free ..vunion ...... remain opm for renal. ope. f Vaff¢ a[ all 1-11 vita a•Je;n.Sr detpon der in A c avn Ggnvt shall be . rrt Ca co rcr Ins cc:[gaf y,ad:., .o:d roving. shish shall Le mLru J en Ccnpat,I. of ate Com V..a Lin to the sa usf,d won of in, City "3 meet. 4 .whet \11o, TT 1021 10. RalLways Stall be provided bit.... publlc slde „IIS and vin.,fte peurtrian areas. il. Concentrated drainage flows shall not sans si Je,alts. Under sidewalk drains Shall be Installed to city standards. x_12. to therstls RCl lon rOf therCity 5En91nner,p,t Lire end of Stdp SVeenled ..Isis ',all be el:unce of druna 9e mnorl fiat tee 0 ... 5t:cam property L.-,h oro none uu1 need [on not xI 1. TM aidlicdnt ,ill be responsible for construction of all pn.sith dra lna9< facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drams ,111 be required at the following loo dons: X y. Tee Pfnposed project falls wltnin a S Indloted a[ [unlect to floodln9 under the hItionel flood r1.r,nn• 0.py in and q vublect l0 Ins Dforls ions of that program and City ,it nonce •ia. 24. _ A. A dra lhige channel and /or flood protec UOn ,all nil be requtrcd to Protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets• storm drain. _ X S. Maquate pmrisi w3 shall be old, for h,rpta¢e and dl,,o,,l of Surface drainage entering the property from adjacent area., 6. letter of accep canoe trod do•mserea:n property owners shall be required unem runoff from the tract IIO,S onto private pmpnrl stir )' Shall De designed as major water carrying strtrots loluIT a t— omCjna UOn of Special cure nn sets. ccnmerual l,P, drive apprgachps, rolled street on III tilts. IImJ yrotecu on w Ifs, Ind /or landscaped earth be led roiled drl vevsys at properly lane. The following storm drain Shill be Installed to the satispction of the CI tY [n9ineer: Per attached Resolution _ 9. prior to recordatfon of the map. a b oad -scale nydmtoglc and Jra image s Cody for the project skull be suhni tied to the City Engineer !or review. L Ulllitlet 1. provide all utility serf lees to sate lot InC,ud,fg water, -' -dill power, gas, telephone and Cable television Condufl. All utilities within the proj Pot Stall be installed unuergrpund ineludin9 sits''ties ,IDng e.Jet after qls less into 12 Ky. !. Utility easame.nta shall be provided to the S Ciffeltion of the sery (n9 u, 114Y Conp Y n Pt dnie3 and the CI[ E 9ineer. C. C.M.Der spa 11 Le r,,NbSlble for the reloutbn of e115t[ng publlc utilities, as required. --X 5. pereloper shall be responsible for the Installation or street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Comwny and City Standard S. N) O 1~- S a( A • A t`..y ce IV 22 :pi A t z 1 x • A A t z • A 0 • 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT��� F_ z DATE: November 18, 1981 u 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Ordering Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract 9584 and Tract 9584 -2 Attached for Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts 9584 and 9584 -2 located north of Hillside, east of Haven Avenue. The developer, Deer Creek Company, has been notified of the public .hearing and signs have been posted at the site. The attached resolution, when signed, will also approve the Engineer'; Report. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution order- ing the subject annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.l and approving the Engineer's Report. Respectfully LBH�tK:jaa Attachments 'ter Resolution No. Page 2 • SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk G • Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor f5! RESOLUTION NO. g(- 179 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR TRACT NO. 9584 AND TRACT NO. 9584 -2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 21st day of October, 1981, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 81 -161 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation Number 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 81 -161 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidvait of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 81 -161, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work; SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Ranc'no Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the district and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 81 -161, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. • C . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION NO. 7 to the Landscape Maintenance District Number 1 Tracts 9584 and 9584 -2 SMION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 9584 and 9584 -2 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. . SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract 9584 and 9584 -2. The plans and specifications for the land- scaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. L] Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract 11ap and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work,, standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. i C� � Engineer's Report Page 2 The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No 1 • (including Annexation No. 7 comprised of 0 square feet of landscaped area and 97 lots) is shown below: Total Annual Maintenance Cost S.30 X 236,688 square feet = 71,006.40 Per Lot Annual Assessment - - 1257 lots a 71,006.40 56.49 Per Lot Monthly Assessment = 4.71 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner maintenance. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this • report and labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for Annexation No. 7 is found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1982, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1981/82 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets a public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. S. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. . 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. L � 0 • -Z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 7 J ~l � J L i i i I{ III I � ' v I •-I\ � J CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA r \ _ x rNGINrrRING DIVISION T 9917 """ VICINITY �\1AP CITY OF RA \CI 10 CUCA, OL. �IO \CA w " = ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITI' SI : \P 1 V T irn I�1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) . ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF IMPROVEMENT I, Lloyd B. Hubbs, being duly sworn, deposes and says, that he is the duly appointed, qualified Superintendent of Streets for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that pursuant to Resolution No. 81 -161 of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, he on the 5th day of November 1981, posted the "Notice of Improvement" of the City Council's intent of consideration of Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 which notice is attached . hereto and made a part hereof; that Notice were posted not more than three hundred (300) feet apart in a consipicuous place along each parcel of property affected by Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Mainte- nance District No. 1 DATE: Sworn and subscribed to me this day 1981 40 Notary Public SLp int ndent of Streets of th,yCity of Rancho Cucamonga 0 Affidavit of Mailing: I, Judy Acosta, Engineering Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby swear that Ideposited in the City's outgoing mail located in the administration building at approximately 4:00 pm on November 51 1981 the attached letter to the Deer Creek Company regarding Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts 9584 and 9584 -2. j /igi i--> JNcj Acosts;, ngineering Secretary Dated: //— 5---V n g i �j 0 1, MEMORANDUM ._ 101. November 13, 1981 TO: The City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Assistant City Managed SUBJECT: Presentation of Alternatives for Development of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Master Plan As you are already aware, the City staff has been working with the County and their architects to develop an alternative to the originally submitted master plan scheme. Attached are both alternatives (labeled Scheme I and Scheme II). Scheme I is a revision of the original proposal submitted to the City Council earlier this year. Scheme II is a second alternative which addresses most of staffs' concerns relating to the originally submitted master plan (Scheme I). Both alternatives will be presented at the City Council's regularly scheduled meeting of November 18, 1981 by H.O.K. and H.M.C. Architects. As part of their presentation, the Architects will outline the evolution of these two alternatives and the merits of each scheme. The objective of this presentation is to arrive at a consensus of the most appropriate scheme for the master plan and receive staff authorization to continue development of Council's preferred alternative. JR /vz Enclosures 1977 Alternatives -- Civic Ctr. Master Plan Page Two November 13, 1981 CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES • SCHEME I 1. Provides a central Courtyard surrounded by accessible parking and loop road circulation. 2. Creates a "singular" identity on site with City Hall and Cultural Center part of a large Courtyard complex. 3. Joint development of a Courtyard would provide the City with infrastructure we probably could not afford to develop ourselves. SCHEME II 1. Creates separate identity and "City" Courtyard scheme. 2. Provides Haven Avenue exposure and reduces "sea" of parking adjacent to Haven Avenue. 3. Provides City Hall and Cultural Center with more accessible and "City" oriented parking. Under Scheme I, City Hail users would be competing for "close in" parking. 4. Provides improved traffic circulation and with longer access road off of Civic Center Drive, there is better stacking (more time for drivers to orient themselves to the site, the appropriate building and accessible parking). 5. Separation from County Court and development of two "satellites" City Courtyard /County Courtyard improves transition of the scale of the buildings. City buildings are proposed two stories and County buildings approximately five stories. 6. Provides more flexibility to the City for long range planning in development of its portion of the site. Being part of a large Courtyard scheme would limit the City's future alter- natives. 7. Scheme II allows the City to move in development of its portion of the Civic Center at its own pace. 8. Provides improved pedestrian circulation for City Hall clients from accessible parking to municipal buildings. 9. Scheme II represents a more suburban theme and less of a highly urbanized theme with the joint Courtyard in Scheme I. * Both Schemes would provide 300 parking spaces allocated for City Hall and Cultural Center uses and developement of a separate City Police Facility. • ,, 0 i • • \co cNtS y�q ClRS � NNa- 91'/'FY Ilt uxs Glr( liau� sr�fF Mel crx� wesr atu,c -r cccKr �� c�.r ceHrta. HOK /NMC SMbnE f ,Zy �flll.� �ni 0 • • STAFF REPORTS °M °��� November 10, 1981 C, / O J a 1977 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager /City Clerk SUBJECT: Change in Election Laws t Permit Consolidation of Municipal Elections Governor Brown recently signed into law a measure which offers the city the option of scheduling municipal elections on the same day as the statewide primary election (June of even numbered years), the day of the statewide general election (November of even numbered years),or on the same day as school district and special district elections (November of odd numbered years). To do so, the City Council may enact an ordinance, requiring its general municipal election to be scheduled on one of these three dates instead of on the second Tuesday of April of even numbered years. The County Board of Supervisors must approve such an ordinance if it is adopted by the City Council. If the ordinance is adopted to consolidate city elections, the terms of City Council members must be extended as well. This extension could be from three months to as long as eighteen months, depending upon which option, if any, is selected. The primary advantages of consolidating city elections with other elections are as follows: 1. A significant cost savings may be realized since the County would assume the primary election expenses for ballots, supplies, precinct workers, postage, and other costs. 2. Consolidation would result in less work for the city clerk's office since most of the election responsibilities would be handled by the County Register of Voters. 3. A larger voter turnout would occur if city elections were consolidated with state primary or general elections. There are also many disadvantages to the implementation of the new law. The major disadvantages are as follows: 1. The city's involvement in the elections for local offices will be minimal. The city council may not wish to relinquish local control of the election process to the county. 2. The County Registrar will not agree to consolidating city elections with the June primary since there may not be space available on the ballot card. 'co City Council Re: Election Law Changes November 10, 1981 3. A higher voter turnout does not guarantee more intelligent decisions. In a local election turnout is low. However, in general, those who vote have made some effort to understand the issues and the positions of candidates. 4. City candidates and issues would be placed at the end of a long ballot. Some voters may vote only on the major (state or federal) issues and candidates and may neglect local offices and ballot issues. Ballot measures which appear at the end of a ballot stand less chance of passing because voters traditionally tire of voting for measures. Also, the loss of visibility in city offices may lead to a loss of interest in those offices. 5. Campaign costs for candidates may increase because consolidation would merge the large expensive campaigns of federal and state offices to compete with the campaigns of the local candidates. City campaign issues, candidates, and publicity materials may be lost amid other "more visible" state and federal candidates and Issues. 6. Consolidation of elections will bring city non- partlan politics together with state and federal partisan politics. • 7. Ballots will be counted by the Registrar of Voters in San Bernardino. Results • will not be timely. Results may be unofficial for several days. This will also mean that elected city officials may not take office seven days after the election as they do now. The County Registrar of Voters has nearly one month to certify and canvass the election. If the City Council wishes to consolidate municipal elections, within 30 days after the enabling ordinance becomes operative, the City Clerk must send written notice to all registered voters informing voters of the change in election date and the extension of terms of city office holders. .If the City Council wishes to consolidate city elections, the city attorney should be instructed to draft the appropriate ordinances. If the Council does not wish to consolidate, no action is required. LHW:baa \J 'C, � 0 Senate Bill No, 230 CHAYCEB 1013 An act to amend Section 2601 of the Elections Code, and to amend Section 3650.7 of, and to add Section 3M.5 to, the Government Code, relating to municipal elections, and declaring the urgency _ thereof, to take effect immediately. (Approved by Governor September 30, 1991. Filed with Secretary of Smte September W. 1991.) LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 230, Schmitz. Municipal election: date. Existing law specifies that a general municipal election must be held on the second Tuesday in April of even - numbered years except in specified limited cases. This bill would authorize a city to hold its general municipal election on the same day as the statewide direct primary election, the day of the statewide general election, or the day of school district elections. This bill would take effect immediately, as an urgency statute. • _ The people of the State of California do enact as follans: SECTION 1. Section 2601 of the Elections Code is amended to read: 2601. Except as provided in Sections 34329.1, 36507.5, and 36504 of the Government Code, a general municipal election shall be held on the second Tuesday in April of even- numbered years. SEC. 2. Section 36103 of the Government Code is amended to read: 36503. Unless otherwise required by Section 34329.1 and except as authorized by Section 36503,.5 or 36504, a general municipal election shall be held on the second Tuesdav in April in each even - numbered year. Except as otherwise provided in this title, city councilmen, the city clerk, and the city treasurer shall be elected by the city electors at a general municipal election. City councilmen, the city clerk, and the city tre;lsur-r shall hold office for four years from the Tuesday succeeding their election, and until their successors are elected and qualified. SEC. 3. Section 36303.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: 36503.5. (a) A city council may enact an ordinance requiring its general municipal election to be held on the same day as the statewide direct primary election, the day of the statewide general election, or on the day of school district elections, as set forth in Section 2602 of the Elections Code. Any ordinance adopted pursuant 0 W so i t r.... • 4, ?:.'c. : :. :. :.y..•'.,.:= j%: { : -.� �r.wt. :.i2•.a!Y^.c.., ..::wa�a Ch. Iola —2— to this subdivision shall become operative upon the approval of the board of supervisors. (b) If an election is held pursuant to subdivision (a), and the election is consolidated with another election, the provisions contained in Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 23300) of Division 14 of the Elections Code shall govern the consolidation, and, if the county clerk is requested to conduct the municipal election, Section 22003 of the Elections Code shall be applicable to that election. (c) If, pursuant to subdivision (a), a general municipal election is held on the same day as a statewide election or the same day as a --s1 school district election, those elected city officers whose four -year terms of office would have, prior to the adoption of the ordinance, expired on the Tuesday succeeding the second Tuesday in April of an even-numbered year, shall, instead, continue in their offices until no later than the fourth Tuesday after the day of the general municipal election. (d) Within 30 days after the ordinance becomes operative • pursuant to subdivision (a), the city clerk shall cause a notice to be mailed to all registered voters informing the voters of the change in the election date. The notice shall also inform the voters that as a result in the change in the election date, elected city officeholders' terms in office will be extended and that no terms shall be decreased. (e) If a city adopts an ordinance pursuant to subdivision (a), the municipal election following the adoption of the ordinance and each municipal election thereafter shall be conducted on the date specified by the city council, in accordance with subdivision (a), unless the ordinance in question is later repealed by the city council. SEC. 4. If any section, part, clause, or phrase of this measure or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the measure which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this measure are severable. SEC. 5. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within -.. u._._.._� the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: In order that certain cities may provide for the orderly conduct of their municipal elections in consolidation with an otherwise scheduled election at the earliest possible time, it is essential that this act take effect immediately. .: Y • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �I • DATE: November 18, 1981 � TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager F'-' UO FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development t9 BY: Rick Marks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: BACKGROUND REPORT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ABSTRACT: This background report has been prepared for the City Council in order to provide background on the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program and the City's participation in it as a new Entitlement City. The information contained in it describes the basic thrust of the program, the work which must be accomplished in order to prepare an application for funding, and the general time frame in which staff will achieve each work item. BACKGROUND: In August of 1974, President Ford signed the omnibus Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 charting an entirely new course for the nation's housing and urban aid programs. The new law consolidated 10 different catagorical aid programs into a locally administered block grant . program and contained broad revisions in the formulas for distributing federal aid. The Community Development Block Grant Program has as its primary objectives the enhancement and maintenance of viable urban communi- ties through the provision of decent housing and a suitable living environ- ment and the expansion of economic opportunities, rind ally for lo and moderate income persons. The act provides financia assistance for c o Wu_ activities directed toward: A. Eliminating slums and blight, preventing deterioration of property, and providing needed neighborhood and community facilities; B. Eliminating conditions which are detrimental to health, safety and public welfare through interim rehabilitation, code enforcement, etc.; C. Conserving and expanding housing stock for all, but principally for low and moderate income persons; D. Expandinq and improving the quantity and quality of community services, principally for loam and moderate intone persons; E. A more rational utilization of land and other natural resources; F. Reducing the isolation of income groups within communities and geo- graphical areas; lqy STAFF REPORT November 18, 1981 Page 2 G. Restoring and preserving properties of special value for historic, architectural or aesthetic reasons; and, H. Alleviating physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization in areas with population outmigration or stagnating or declining tax base. Entitlement Cities The Community Development Block Grant Program automatically entitles cities with a population greater than 50,000 to block grants. The amount of the block grant received by an entitlement city is based on a five -part formula reflecting the ratio of a particular community's population, extent of housing overcrowding, poverty, age of housing, and growth lag to the average figures for all similar communities. • Last year the City of Rancho Cucamonga was part of the San Bernardino County Cooperating Cities Program (this type of program is also authorized by the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act) and was awarded approxi- • mately 5350,000.00. Out of that sum the County took 30% for housing reha- bilitation (only a fraction of which was used in Rancho Cucamonga, the rest remained with the County), and up to 1011 for administrative costs (precise dollar amounts are unavailable because our money was "lumped in" with money for all other Cooperating Cities). Earlier this year the City was informed that the 1980 Census of Population conducted by the federal government confirmed that the City has a population in excess of 50,000, thereby giving it status as an Entitlement City under the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act. The implications of this channe in status from Cooperating City under the County administered program to Entitlement City are that the almost 40% of the grant award that now goes to the County will remain in Rancho Cucamonga to be used as the City Council determines. This change in status allows the City to select the prograris it will fund, administer them and overall, give the City greater local control over the program. The most recent information given Entitlement Cities (and Cooperating Cities) by the Los Angeles Area Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Devel- opment is that because the Reagan Administration is trying to substantially reduce the federal budget all grant recipients will receive between 10, ", and 20'S less this year than they received last _year. The federal government is also greatly reducing the number and scopes regulations governing the pro- gram in hones of making it administratively more manaqable. The new regula- tions should be available for review early next year. • )y5 • STAFF REPORT November 18, 1981 Page 3 Next Steos During the next four months or so the City must begin work on (and complete a portion of) the following: 1. Conduct a departmental needs assessment designed to afford the City an opportunity to evaluate potential target area capitol facilities and programing needs. (When as yet unreleased Census data is made available, actual target areas will be established; for purposes of conducting the needs assessment all potential target areas will have to be examined). 2. Develop a proposed statement of Community Development Objectives pro- jecting the use of funds. 3. Develop a citizens participation process that will: . a. Furnish citizens information concerning the amount of funds available for proposed community development and housing activities and the range of activities that may be under- taken; 0 b. Publish a proposed statement in such manner to afford affected citizens and opportunity to examine its content and to submit comments on the proposed statement and on community develop- ment performance. C, Hold one or more public hearings to obtain the views of citizens on community development and housing needs; and, d. Consider any such comments and views in preparing the statement and, if deemed appropriate, modify the proposed statement, and make the final statement available to the public. 4. Prepare a final statement of Community Development Objectives and use of funds. 5. Begin the Environmental Review of proposed projects according to National Environmental Policy Act Guidelines. 6. Develop those administrative procedures and systems required by the Federal Government of local jurisdictions participating in the Community Develooment Block Grant Program as Entitlement Cities. �q& STAFF REPORT November 18, 1981 Page 4 • SUMMARY: Participation this year as an Entitlement City in the Community Development Block Grant Program offers the City the opportunity to continue and expand the work already begun under the Cooperating Cities Program but with greater local determination and control. Staff has already begun pre- liminary work on preparing the necessary information to support an applica- tion and anticipates conducting a needs assessment during the months of November and December of this year. If members of the City Council have any suggestions for capitol improvements projects or programs they would like to see evaluated as part of the needs assessment process, it would be helpful if they were received during that time period. Additionally, if the Council would like any specific information regarding the Community Development Block Grant Program, Staff will gather it as quickly as possible. It is important for the City Council to bear in mind that while the City has some experience in the CDBG program as a former Cooperating City under the County program, there are some critical "unknowns" that will have an impact on this program. Among these "unknowns" are the exact level of funding the City may expect to receive and the final regulations governing the program. As this infor- mation is made available to the Staff (probably in early 1982), it will be sent to the City Council. • Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:RM:kp 1c/ -7 • Attachment 1: Eligible and Ineligible Activities ?rceram !:li:ibilit.9 Reoulatiors • Urder rgdl_.tions issued by HUD (Dated August 27, 1979), there are six (6` basic estegor•es of eligible activities: 1) Basic eligible activities; 2) eligible rehabilitation and tr•eservation activities; 3) eliglibe economic develctment activities; 4) eligible activities by private non- crcfit en- .. —es, neighborhood -based non- profit organization, local develc m—n- cor_ccrations, or sm211 business investment companies; 5) eligible plainn'r-i and urban envircnmen *al design costs, and; 6) eligible administrative costs. An explanation of each of the categories of eligible activities is given below. :,'o points, however, should be noted. First, the following list is condensed f1.Om the regulations and is simplified; the final decision as to whether a project is eligible or not should be made by referring directly I o the regulations. Second, arty eligible uro7ect must meet the criteria of A. Basic ?'liaible Activities "This section includes the majority of capital imorowment projects which may be considered for funding within designated target areas. 1. Accuisition of Real PrcOerty which does not meet current 'ldirg cope �srandards, wnicz mad be preserved as a historic sire or valuable community service, Or,used for an eligible activity. . 2. Distosition of Real ProterL9 scouired under the GREG program. 3• Accuisiticr.. Construction. Rehabilitation, or Installation of certain publieally owned - facilities, suca as: a. Senior Centers b. Parks, Playgrounds C. Centers for the :andicao_red d. Neighborhood Facilities e. Solid haste Disposal Facilities f. Fire Protection Facilities and 3quipment g. Parking Facilities h. Street Improvements i. 'dater and Sewer Systems J. Pedestrian Aai13 and 51alkinys k. Flood Control and Drairaa_a I=xrovements I. Other Improvements vital to a cc=zutity'a deve'_oceen' 4. Clearance n ^d demo!'tirn of deteriorated buildings and La wn:bn my to a realth razard to the cc.^unity. 5. Interea Assistance or temtorary help to alleviate harmc*t. or dam —roux conpitions, such as the repairing of streets, playg•cunds or pr irate prcparty, or trash and garbage removal. 6. Relocation P�v. --- ^as for art person displaced frce their hoes • due to a CDC FEded activity or for loss of rental incOCe. 7. Re_o•ral o° Arc^ "fctu a Bar-'era that restr'c. the mobil' o. ra ^.aia__ed _oeracr�. �jC, // ' �l L B. Mizible Rehabilitation avid Preservation Activities Under this section CDEG fluids may be used for the rehabilitation of builii:.gs and improvements, both public and privately owned. This section of the regulations authorizes the County's acquisition of, • and rehabilitation financing for, private proterties, it also pr;vr: es for tecpor3ry relocation assistance, code enforcement, and historic nresenatlon activities. C. Eligible Economic Develc=nt Activity Neighborhood based nor -profit organizations, small business investment companies, or local development corporations are eligible for B'loc's Grant funds to implement certain economic development and commercial revitalization activities. The financial assistance can be in the fcn of grants, loans, loan guarantees, or technical assistance to er_stirg sa11 businesses, minority businesses neighborhood non- profit business. The above groups can use the Block Grant duds for the following purposes: Working capital, operational funds, lend purchase, purcha of equipment and fixtures, energy construction .trove_ents, acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, or ins -.aj?atim of commercial and industrial building. However, aL economic development activities must meet the following criteria: 1) Ccabirs private and public investments toward alleviating physical date,. orelion or atonic distress in a community; 2) Benefit lower inccce a'jj handicapced persons by providing jobs; 3) and fit into an over?1 economic development strategy. D. Planning and Administration ;tenses CD--G !`arils ape authorized for the following activities: 1. Preparing comprehensive community development plans; • 2. Prerarirg cccxunity-wide plans for land use historieall preservation, economic development, and neighborhood preservation; 3. Administrative cost relating to the plsrmirg and imple =entatien of community development activities. lneli_ bla Activities The following types of activities are generally ineligible: 1. Stadiums, convention centers, concert halls, city hills, regional headquarters for public safety :genies (buildings and faclil :des for the general conduct of government). 2. Fire stations and equipment in target areas where no other CDBO activity is cccur_ng in the sac: nrogr3a year. 3. Facilities for excl':eive use by one group or orgwnlcati=. 4. Maintenance- and operation expenses, including deferred maintenance. 5. New housing constriction. 6. Puolic service except in a reighborheed stratarw area (!MA). • 7. Hospitals, nur>_irg homes acrd other medical facilitlis. B. Airports, subays, trolly lines, bus or otter tra^.sl: a =lrals. 9. Parchase of xvabl- equi=ent or ccnstriat!cn e^^'^_ nt. [CI n S- R �( November Oecember 1982 January February • March April May C Program We June Schedule M 0 e d s A s e s s m e n t Public clearing 11UD ( C i t y D e p r t m e n t s) on Proposed Processing Statement of of C. ru.ity Devel- Application aPment object - (30 days) Ives Proposed Incorporate Statement of Citizen comments Community De- into Final velopment ab- Statement of jectives Community Devel- opment object- - Develop Ives - Publish - Distribute Begin En vi r0nmentaI Review Process 0a v e I o o C o m m u n I t Development Black Grant Mena 9 a m e n t Procedures L REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA November 18, 1981 1. CALL TO ORDER. ' jI I A. ROLL CALL: Frost, Mikelsi, Palombo \t, Bridge_, 'and SchlossdR B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None were submitted for approval. 2. STAFF REPORTS. • A. AUTHORIZE TRANSMITTAL OF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO FOR SELECTING THE PROJECT AREA - Physical, social, conditions and the proposed method of financing. 3. ADJOURNMENT. 0 Chairman Phillip D. Schlosser Present were Agency Members: James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, and Chairman Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present were: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman; Legal Counsel, John Brown; Consultant, Abraham DeDios; and Community Development Director, Jack Lam. 2. STAFF REPORTS 2A. AUTHORIZE TRANSMITTAL OF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO INCLUDE REASONS FOR SELECT- ING THE PROJECT AREA. Mr. DeDios, consultant, went over changes to the "Report to City Council" which he distributed before the meeting. Mr. Bridge asked a question relating to page 7 of the "Report to Citv Council" under Agency Bonds, are we going to repay these? Since the largest percent of the funds depend on infrastructure which will not be revenue producing% it looks like this is not designed for our type of redevelopment. Mr. DeDios stated that they hoped that by having the project as proposed adopted, the increments from potential development would be sufficient to generate sufficient tax increment bonds to pay for potential public improvements. Discussion continued regarding this between Mr. DeDios and the Agency. Chairman Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. RA81 -11 and to waive the entire reading. Mr. Frost asked if we could delete paragraph i on page 4. Mr. Brown stated that he could not find this in the State or Federal requirements; as far as he could determine this was not legally required. The Agency concurred that this should be deleted. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The title of Resolution No. RA81 -11 was read by Secretary Lauren Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. RA81 -11 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF THE REPORT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL ACCOMPANYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 3. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 11:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Assistant Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 18, 1981 TO: Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Ci�3cAA+ory (d° or 2 f 'C1 FII U 2 VII > 1977 BACKGROUND: Attached you will find the Report To The City Council which is required as setforth in the Redevelopment Law, Section 33352. The purpose of this report is to summarize all the issues which the City Council and Redevelopment Agency considers in adoption of a Re- development Project. This report provides an overview of the following areas: - Conformity to the General Plan - Background on Development of the Redevelopment Plan - A Summary of Financing Mechanisms - A Neighborhood Impact Report - Information on Physical, Social, and Economic Conditions within the Project Area - A Plan for Relocation of Families - The Recommendation of the Planning Commission The report will be used as a source of information during the public hearings on -adopting the Redevelopment Plan. The attached Resolution is legally necessary in order that the City Council officially receives the report from the Redevelopment Agency. RECO'IME'IDATION: It is recormmended that the Redevelopment Agency approve the attached Resolution transmitting the report to the City Council. P.eipectfu] ly 1submi tied, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development Attachments: Redevelopment Agency Resolution, Report to the City Council 40 RESOLUTION NO. RH It A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF THE REPORT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL ACCOMPANY- ING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOP- MENT -PHUF FOR —THF- RANCHO *EDEYEtBPM -PROnC7. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared a Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, Section 33352 of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California Health and Safety Code requires that every Redevelopment Plan submitted by the Redevelopment Agency to the leg- islative body shall be accompanied by a report on the Proposed Redevel- opment Project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency is hereby authorized and directed to transmit to the City Council the • Agency's Report to the City Council Accompanying the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. SECTION 2: The Secretary of the Agency shall certify to the adoption o —this is resolution. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1981. ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, Secretary • Phillip D. Sch osser, Chairman MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Lam FROM: Abraham DeDios�� DATE: November 18, 1981 SUBJECT: Report to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Relocation Method for the Rancho Redevelopment Project It is recommended that the following modifications be made to the Report to City Council: 1. Page 2, Section 11, second paragraph. Change last sentence to read: "Selection of the Project Area was also based upon the desire to revitalize the existing commercial uses along Foothill Boulevard and assist in rehabilitating residential sites and provide for more housing opportunities within the Project Area." 2. Page 8, Section V, first sentence of second paragraph. Change "personal property" to "residential property." 3. Page 9, Section V, subsection C. Replace "current regulations of the State of California governing relocation assistance" with "the current California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines." 4. Page 17, Section V, subsection E 6, first paragraph. Replace "Regulations Governing Relocation Payments" with "California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines ". 5. Page 19, subsection e(3). Change entire section to read as follows: (3) Additional documentation include income tax return and proof of age, as we papers, evidence the claimant. be required by the Agency, and may iholding or informational statements, and related ency's files, writing to f4 The following modifications should be made to the Relocation Method: Page 4, paragraph (1)(i). After the last sentence, add the following: "(Except for a married couple and children under six years of age, all occupants of a sleeping room should be of the same sex.)" 2. Page 5, paragraph b. Add the modification mentioned in item 1 above as a separate sentence following the last sentence of the first paragraph. 3. Page 12, paragraph 8c. After the last sentence, add the following: "In federally assisted projects, Redevelopment Agency decisions can be appealed to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Upon exhaustive administrative remedies, a claimant may seek judicial review if he so chooses!' Many of the recommended changes are minor modifications and are recommended pursuant to the Agency's amendments to the Relocation Method determined at their last meeting of November 9, 1981. The recommended changes to the Relocation Method reflect current State and HUD relocation assistance guidelines. Such provisions are reflected in the Report to City Council. Attached are the respective pages of Report to City Council and Relocation Method reflecting the changes identified above. ALD:pbc Attachments cc: Manuel DeDios Lauren Wasserman Tim Beedle include (1) the number of dwelling units housing persons and famlies of low or moderate income expected to be destroyed or removed from the low -and moderate- income housing market as part of a redevelopment project, (2) the number of persons and families of low or moderate income expected to be displaced by the project, (3) the general location of housing to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed pursuant to Section 33413, (4) the number of dwelling units housing persons and families of low- or moderate income planned for construction or rehabilitation, other than replacement housing, (5) the projected means of financing the proposed dwelling units for housing persons and families of low and moderate income planned for construction or rehabilitation, and (6) a projected timetable for meeting the plan's relocation, rehabilitation, and replacement housing objectives. (m) An analysis by the agency of the report submitted by the county as required by Section 33328 (Paragraph (j) above), which shall include a summary of the consultation of the agency or attempts to consult by the agency with each of the taxing agencies as required by Section 33328. This report to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council is prepared and submitted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ( "Agency ") in accordance with applicable sections of the California Community Redevelopment Law, which sections require the Agency to: - Prepare a Redevelopment Plan for the project area. - Conduct public hearings thereon. - Approve a Redevelopment Plan for the project area. - Submit the Redevelopment Plan to the City Council together with a report containing the information listed above. 11. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF THE PROJECT AREA In its desire to revitalize blighted areas, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has proposed the Rancho Redevelopment Project. By creating a Redevelopment Agency, the City Council has also declared its desire to improve, upgrade and revitalize those blighted areas within the City which constitute either physical, social or economic liabilities requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. The selection of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area was generally based upon a desire to eliminate the potential health and safety hazards within the proposed Project Area caused by the lack of public improvements such as adequate flood control channels, grade separations when needed, and an adequate circulation system throughout the proposed Project Area to facilitate anticipated growth. The high cost associated with these needed improvements has deterred major property owners from developing their property. Selection of the Project Area was also based upon the desire to revitalize the existing commercial uses along Foothill Boulevard and assist in rehabilitating residential sites and provide for more housing opportunities within the Project Area. -2- street system to and from, as well as within, the project area. As available, other sources of funding, including federal loans and grants, may be used to finance portions of the project costs. B. Tax Increments All taxes levied upon taxable property within the boundaries of the Rancho Redevelopment Project each year by or for the benefit of the State of California, County of San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called 'taxing agencies ") after the effective date of the ordinance approving the Rancho Redevelopment Project, shall be divided according to Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code as follows: (a) "That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of the taxing agencies upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the redevelopment project as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes by or for said taxing agencies on which all other properties are paid (for the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not include the territory in a redevelopment project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory has been annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessment roll of the county last equalized on the effective date of the ordinance shall be used in determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the project on the effective date); and (b) That portion of the levied taxes each year in excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into a special fund of the redevelopment agency to pay the principal of and interest on loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by such redevelopment agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, such redevelopment project. Unless and until the total assessed valuation of the ta;,able property in rile redevelopment project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in such project as shown by the last equalized assessment roll referred to in subdivision (a), all of the taxes levied and collected upon the taxable property in such redevelopment project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When such loans, advances and indebtedness, if any, and interest thereon have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in such redevelopment project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid." That portion of taxes mentioned in subdivision (b) above is hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of an interest on the advance of monies, or making of loans, or the incurring of any indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) by the Agency to finance or refinance in whole, or in part, the Rancho Redevelopment Project. -6- it become necessary for the Agency to acquire property as a result of failure on the part of prospective owner - participants to perform, then the Agency may acquire property, but it will do so only after it has been assured that there are bonafide developers who are immediately willing and able to repurchase such property from the Agency, such that the Agency is effectively reimbursed for its costs incurred. The proposed Plan does not allow the Agency to use eminent domain proceedings to acquire property, except as an alternative to effectuate the purposes of the proposed Plan in the event an owner participant fails to participate as mutually agreed between the Agency and owner. In assisting in providing the public improvements and other activities contemplated in the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, the Agency will spend funds not to exceed the tax increment funds, and the funds based thereon, available from said Project Area. Additional funds, including but not limited to loans, grants, interest revenue, or other financial sources, may be expended by the Agency, if available to the Agency. To encourage and facilitate residential developments consistent with Agency objectives, the Agency will rely upon issuance of tax- exempt mortgage revenue bonds as permitted by law. It is expected that participating developers will defray the Agency's costs of issuing such bonds. It is also expected that the Agency's cost to administer such financing programs will emanate from revenues generated as a result of properly structuring such programs to so provide. Commercial and industrial development /redevelopment will also be facilitated through the Commercial Revenue Bonds and Industrial Development Bonds. Such financings in concert with the Agency financial assistance in financing major public improvement projects through Tax Allocation Bonds should provide a significant incentive for development of the vastly underutilized Redevelopment Project Area. V. METHOD AND PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF FAMILIES AND PERSONS TO BE DISPLACED Pursuant to Section 33352 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Redevelopment Agency is required to prepare a method or plan for the relocation of families and persons to be temporarily or permanently displaced from housing facilities in the Project Area, which method or plan shall include the provision required by Section 33411.1 of said law that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. The Redevelopment Agency does not anticipate acquisition of residential property as evidenced by specifically precluding the use of eminent domain, as— stated in Section 201 of the Redevelopment Plan, and emphasing rather development of properties by owner participants. However, should any family or persons,be displaced as a result of the Agency's redevelopment efforts, the Agency recognizes and is committed to fulfill its obligations pursuant to applicable sections of the California Community Redevelopment Law, particularly with respect to its displacement of low or moderate -8- income families and persons, and the Agency shall take necessary actions to ensure that no such persons or families are displaced unless and until there is suitable housing available and ready for occupancy by such displacees at prices or rents comparable to those prevailing at the time of their displacement. In addition, the Agency shall make relocation benefits and shall provide assistance pursuant to Section 7260 et seq. of the California Government Code and Guidelines promulgated by the Department of Housing and Community Development. In compliance with Section 33352 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the following method or plan for relocation of families and persons is provided: A. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the local public agency which is responsible for the relocation of any individuals, families, businesses, and institutions that are to be displaced from the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area as a result of project activities. The Agency will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff and consultants supplemented by assistance from local realtors, social agencies, and civic organizations. B. At the appropriate time in the redevelopment process, a specific relocation plan will be prepared and approved detailing the needs of displacees and matching these needs to available housing resources. All persons who will be displaced and interested neighborhood groups shall be given the opportunity to participate in reviewing the relocation plan and monitoring the relocation assistance program. C. All relocation planning and relocation activities will be accomplished in accordance with the current California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines. D. It is the Agency's objective that all site residents be rehoused with a minimum of hardship in accommodations which are decent, safe, sanitary, and suitable to their individual needs; located in areas not less desirable than their existing environment in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities; reasonably accessible to their places of employment, and priced within their financial means. No individual or family shall be required to move until such housing is available. E. The following administrative procedures shall be followed to assure a successful relocation program; 1. Redevelopment Agency Staff and /or Consultant Functions a. Interpret the Agency's program to all site occupants and the general public to enlist their understanding and support, and to answer questions about the project and its effect upon site occupants. b. Determine the relocation needs and desires of all site occupants through personal interviews, keep them informed of their rights and responsibilities under the program and of the relocation resources, special services, and aids available to them. -9- a. Failure to pay rent. b. Maintenance of a nuisance or use of the premises for illegal purposes. C. A material breach of the rental agreement. d. Refusal to consider, without adequate reason, accommodations meeting relocation standards. e. Refusal to admit a member of the Agency's staff to the premises or failure to otherwise cooperate with the Agency. 1. Situations requiring eviction under state or local law. If eviction proceedings are necessary, every effort will be made to provide relocation services prior to eviction. 6. Relocation Payments The Agency will make Relocation Payments to all eligible families, individuals, businesses and institutions displaced by project activities in accordance with the California Relocation Assistance and Real Pro ert Ac uisition Guidelines as established by the State of California or appropriate teaeral regulations as amended from time to time. An Informational Statement will notify the site occupant of his eligibility for relocation payments and generally instruct him on procedures for filing claims. Complete rules and regulations will be carefully explained individually to each site occupant and copies of all instructions given to him. Site occupants may consult with the Agency's relocation staff whenever problems arise; and, by recurring visits, the staff will try to anticipate problems and provide appropriate solutions or recommendations. a. Qualifications and Conditions for Payments The Agency will pay reasonable and necessary moving expenses and storage costs, Businesses may be compensated for actual direct loss of value of personal property for which reimbursement or compensation is not otherwise made by the Agency (through purchase, etc.), or a combination of both. Families and individuals may qualify for replacement housing payments and certain businesses may be eligible for an alternate payment in lieu of moving expenses and certain other expenses. Former owners will be reimbursed for certain settlement costs and related charges incurred in the sale of property to the Agency. -17- (c) Self -moves for businesses may be approved. e. Documenting Claims A claim must be supported by the following: (1) If for moving expenses, except in the case of a fixed payment, an itemized receipted bill or other evidence of such expense. (2) If for actual direct loss of personal property, written evidence thereof, which may include appraisals, certified prices, copies of bills of sale, receipts, cancelled checks, copies of advertisements, offers to sell, auction records, and such other records as may be appropriate to support the claim. (3) Additional documentation may be required by the Agency, and may include income tax returns, withholding or informational statements, and proof of age, as well as financial statements and accounting records or similar evidence acceptable to the Agency. All claim papers, income tax returns and return information, and related evidence will become permanent records in the Agency's files. Nothing in this Relocation Method shall be construed to require disclosure of records, the disclosure of which is exempted or prohibited pursuant to provisions of federal or state law. The reason for disallowing any portion of any claim will be stated in writing to the claimant. Assistance to Businesses and Others a. Individuals All services to be offered displaced families will be equally available to individuals occupying separate housekeeping or nonhousekeeping accommodations. b. Others The relocation staff will cooperate fully with an owner of any property in the project area which is not proposed to be acquired by the Agency but which must be vacated in order for the owner to participate in the redevelopment program. If he and /or his tenants are so vacated, then all of the Agency's relocation services will be offered to them. C. Business and institutional site occupants will be personally interviewed to determine their relocation needs and preferences, provided general and special information material, assisted in preparing relocation claims, helped in finding other suitable locations within or outside the project area, and referred to other groups or agencies for assistance in completing a satisfactory relocation. As the situation requires, the relocation staff will refer these site occupants to, and maintain liaison between, the Small -19- Business Administration, the Economic Development Administration, trade associations, Chamber of Commerce, lending institutions, real estate agencies, brokers, and multiple listing realty boards in order that they may be assisted on a nondiscriminatory basis in obtaining suitable relocation premises, financial help, and guidance in re- establishing their operations. Information about the Office of the Economic Development Administration will be available from the relocation staff, and referrals to them and to others who can assist commercial displacees will be made with the same consistency and comprehensiveness as referrals of residents to social service agencies. The Agency will provide special staff and consulting services to effectively assist this group in carrying out their goals. S. Grievance Procedures Displacees will be informed by Agency staff members of their right to appeal regarding relocation decisions that are made. Any person aggrieved by a determination as to eligibility for, or the amount of a relocation payment, may have his claim reviewed in the following manner: a. Such person shall request in writing that the Executive Director, or his designee, review the matter with the person making this request. The Executive Director shall notify such person in writing of his decision after reviewing and considering all reasonably available evidence. b. After review of the matter by the Executive Director and receipt of his decision, or in the event such person has not received notification of the Executive Director's decision within thirty (30) days after filing the initial request for review, the person may file his complaint in writing with the Relocation Appeals Board. Such Relocation Appeals Board will promptly ear a suc complaints pursuant to the provision of the Relocation Program providing for relocation assistance and administration of claims as outlined in the pertinent regulations. The Board shall, after a public hearing on the matter, transmit its findings and recommendations to the Agency Members. C. After the public hearing by the Relocation Appeals Board and receipt of its findings and recommendations, the Agency Members shall conduct a hearing on the aggrieved person's complaint and shall give such person at least five (5) days written notice prior to hearing the matter. The aggrieved person shall be notified in writing of the decision of the Agency Members within five (5) days after such decision, and the basis -20- (f) Has provision for artificial lighting for each room. (g) Is structurally sound, in good repair and adequately maintained. (h) Each building used for dwelling purposes shall have two safe unobstructed means of egress leading to safe open space at ground level. Each dwelling unit in a multi - dwelling building must have access either directly or through a common corridor to two means of egress to open space at ground level. In buildings of three stories or more, the common corridor on each story must have at least two means of egress. (i) Every sleeping room shall contain not less than 90 square feet of superficial floor area and at least one window opening to the outside. If more than two persons occupy the room, an additional 60 square feet of floor area shall be required for each additional person. (Except for a married couple and children under six years of age, all occupants of a sleeping room should�6e or t e same sex• (2) Light Housekeeping Rooms (a) The standards for decent, safe, and sanitary housing as applied to the rental of sleeping rooms shall include the minimum requirements contained in paragraphs a, d, f, g and h, above, and the following: (i) At least 9D square feet of habitable floor space; and, further, that occupancy of such facility is limited to one person. (ii) Lavatory and toilet facilities that provide privacy, including a door that can be locked if such facilities are separate from the room. (b) Housing accommodations shall be regarded as satisfactory for PERMANENT RELOCATION of a specific site occupant if, in addition to meeting the above requirements for standard housing, such accommodations are also: (i) Reasonably convenient to public transportation, shopping and other community facilities. (ii) Reasonably accessible to the site occupant's place of employment. (iii) Priced within site occupant's ability to pay. -4- b. Occupancy Standards An otherwise standard dwelling may not be considered as standard for a specific family unless it provides adequate sleeping space for all the family members. Living Rooms should not be considered for sleeping purposes except in the case of an efficiency or studio apartment. (Except for a married couple and children under six vears of aee. all occupants of a The :ollowing standards will be considered as a guide in determining sleeping space needs for a family, always bearing in mind that the age, sex, and relationship of the individual family members, or health factors, may cause some variance. Number of Number of Occupants Bedrooms Minimum Maximum 2 3 (if child is under 3 years of age) 5 7 9 12 C. Standards for Displacee's Ability to Pay The relocation staff will give consideration to the particular financial situation of each family or individual and will seek the site occupant's concurrence in the final determination of what he can afford to pay for housing. Every effort will be made to maintain the lowest possible housing cost - income ratio, which at the same time provides the relocatee adequate housing. As a general rule, displacees are usually able to pay gross monthly rentals based on the following criteria: (1) Families and individuals - 25% of adjusted gross income. (2) Displacees eligible for public housing rents as established by the Housing Authority, which are graded to income. (3) Public Assistance cases - maximum rent allowances under statutory or other limitations governing the disbursing agency. Income, assets and debts are to be evaluated in determining the relative ability of a relocatee to purchase a home. A full purchase price which is approximately two and one -half times annual gross family income, combined with monthly payments not exceeding 25% of adjusted gross monthly income, will be considered as being within the financial means of those contemplating home ownership. -5- S. Grievance Procedures Displacees will be informed by Agency staff members of their right to appeal regarding relocation decisions that are made. Any person aggrieved by a determination as to eligibility for, or the amount of a relocation payment, may have his claim reviewed in the following manner: a. Such person shall request in writing that the Executive Director, or his designee review the matter with the person making this request. The Executive Director shall notify such person in writing of his decision after reviewing and considering all reasonably available evidence. b. After review of the matter by the Executive Director and receipt of his decision, or in the event such person has not received notification of the Executive Director's decision within thirty (30) days after filing the initial request for review, the person may file his complaint in writing with the City's Relocation Appeals Board. Such Relocation Appeals Board will promptly hear all such complaints pursuant to the provisions of the Relocation Program providing for relocation assistance and administration of claims as outlined in the pertinent regulations. The Board shall, after a public hearing on the matter, transmit its findings and recommendations to the Agency Members. C. After a public hearing by the Relocation Appeals Board, and receipt of its findings and recommendations, the Agency Members shall conduct a hearing on the aggrieved person's complaint and shall give such person at least five (5) days written notice prior to hearing the matter. The aggrieved person shall be notified in writing of the decision of the Agency Members within five (5) days after such decision, and the basis for such decision. The decision transmitted by the Agency shall represent the final decision of the Redevelopment Agency. In federally assisted projects, -12- November 18, 1981 - City Council meeting. Addressing Council on the Roberts and Shaffer /Westland Appeals were: 1. Sheryl Moody, 6355 Jadeite Avenue. 2. Lee Marcacci, 6368 Jadeite. 3. Muriel Forst, 6235 Dartmouth. 4. Phillip Marcacci, 6368 Jadeite. 5. Fred Nelson, owner of property on sw corner. 6. Carl Heinz,6471 Jadeite. 7, Chuck Newsom, 9717 Coca Street 8. Bob Shane, Kinsman 9. Toni Ryan, 6067 Burgandy 10. Jeff Callaway, 9716 Coca 11. Kathryn Burr, 6210 Phillips Way 12. Bob Oakley, Dartmouth 13. Colleen Wang, 9641 Hidden Farms Road 14. Toni Quezada, representing Roberts 15. G. G. Porst, 6232 Dartmouth 16. Otto Kubik, 6267 Phillips Way. 17, Sam Angona 18. Nancy Jones (no address given)