HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/02/04 - Agenda Packetcrrv of
xnNCa-~o ct~cnnnon~cn
CITY COUNCIL
AGF.NL1~
February 4, 1981
All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing. The deadline
far submitting items is 5:00 p. m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednes-
day of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
p. Flag Salute.
B. Roll Call: Frost, Mikels_, Palombo_, Bridge, and Schlosser
C. Approval of Minutes: City Council minutes of January 7 and 21, 1981
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Monday, February 2 -General Plan Public Hearing - 7:00 p.m. - Lion's
Park Community Center. To discuss:
- Recommendations on Land Use Designations for Etiwanda Plamri ng Area.
- Review Park and Recreation Element Policies.
- Review General Plan Policies for Planned Communities Planning Area.
b. Monday, February 9 - General Plan Public Hearing - 7:00 p.m. - Lion's
Park Community Center. To discuss:
- Recommendations on Land Use Designations for Planned Communities Planning
Rrea.
- Recommendations nn Park and Recreation Element Policies.
- Summary of Recommendations on Public Input and Comments Received.
c. Tuesday, February 10 - Historical Commission Meeting - 7:00 p.m. - Lion's
Park Comm nity Center.
d. Wednesday, February 11 - Planning Commission Meeting - 7:00 p.m. - Lion's
Park Community Center.
City Council Agenda -2- February 4, 1961
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without
discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 81-2-4 for $36,183.04
b. Alcoholic Beverage License for the Southland Corp „
Shelly Axelrod, 7-Eleven Market, 9464 Base Line., trans-~
fer license, off-sale beer and wine.
c. Alcoholic Beverage License for Socorro's, Clifford J.
and Socorro M. Solorzano, for on-sale beer and wine
for bona fide public eating place, 10276 Foothill
Blvd.
d. Refer Claim by Gary C. Christy to the City Attorney for
handling.
1
3
4
5
e. Request from Sheriff's Department for recongition of 8
Reserve Officers' Dedication. It is recommended that
$300 be appropriated from the contingency fund to pay for
the January 24, 1981 Installation Dinner for the Reserve
Unit.
f. Request from Sheriff's Department. A request to construct 11
counter and shelves for the reception area and to award
the bid to John vonk. It is recommended that $500.00 be
transferred from the contingency fund far this project.
g. Release of Bonds:
Parcel Ma 4804: located on the south side of 9th Street
at Lion. ner: Daniel J. Salter & Michael Todd.
Performance Bond (road) $ 40,000
Tract 9403: located north of Highland Avenue and east of
Mayberry Rvenue. Owner: Olympus Pacific Corp.
Faithful Performance Bond (water) $ 41,000
Faithful Performance Bond (sewer) 13,000
Cash Staking Bond 2,350
Tract 9423: located on the west side of Beryl, south of
Base Line. Owner: Coral Investment Inc.
13
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $137,500
City Council Agenda -3- February 4, 1981
Tract 9480: located south of Base Line, west of Turner.
Owner: Kent Land Co.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $126,000
Faithful Performance Bond (water) 42,000
Faithful Performance Bond (sewer) 61,000
Tract 9521: located on the west side of Archibald, north of
Hillside. Owner: Lewis Homes of California.
Faithful Performance Bond (landscaping) $ 78,000
h. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6011, Improvement Agreement, and 15
Improvement Security. --
Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt
the resolution accepting Parcel Map 6011, improvement agree-
ment, and improvement security.
RESOLUTION N0. 81-17 16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6011, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
N0. 6011), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVE-
MENT SECURITY.
i. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6585 and Real Property Improvement 23
Contract and Lien Agreement.
Recomnenda tion: It is recommended that City Council adopt
a resolution approving Parcel Map 6585 and accept Real Pro-
perty Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the side-
walk on Milliken.
RESOLUTION N0. 81-18 24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6585, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
N0. 6585) REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT,
AND LIEN AGREEMENT.
j. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien 29
Agreement for 8623 Et iwanda (D.R. 80-28). (J .T. Guiders)
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council
accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lf en
Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign
the same, and direct the City Clerk to record the same.
City Council Agenda -4- February 4, 1981
RESOLUTION N0. 81-19 30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM JOE T. GUIDERA, JR. AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR RND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME.
4. CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RANCHO 34
CUCAMONGA FINANCIAL TASK FORCE
At its meeting of January 15, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Financ-
ial Task Force adopted a motion recommending that the City Council
evaluate the feasibility of hiring staff to be assigned to
monitoring and pursuing appropriate grants and that the City
seriously consider the feasibility of establishing a Redevelop-
ment Agency. The motion also included a recommendation to con-
sider lease back agreements and to determine how appropriate
they would be for Rancho Cucamonga.
PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-13 - NUBANK. A zone change from A-P
administrative-professions to R-3 (multi-family resi-
dential) for 6.4 acres generally located south of Base
Line on the west side of Hellman - APN 208-011-02, 03,
and 04.
ORDINANCE N0. 133 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN[R, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208-011-02, 03, RND
04 FROM A-P TO R-3 LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE
ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE.
62
8. ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-16 - LANDMARK. A zone change from A-1 63
limited agricu tuna to R- single family residential)
for 1.65 acres located on the west side of Turner Avenue
at Ironwood Street (related item: TT 11577) - APN 1077-
041-58.
ORDNANCE N0. 134 (second reading) 63
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1077-041-58 FROM
A-1 to R-1 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER
AVENUE AT IRONWOOD STREET.
City Council Agenda -5- February 4, 1981
C. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE N0. 105, RELATING TO PARK DEDI-
C TIONS IN NEW SUBDI ISI NS, ND S R N RES LU-
TION T TH T END E T.
ORDINANCE N0. 105-8 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE N0. 105.
RESOLUTION N0. 81-73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISH-
ING AVERAGE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PARKLAND PER
ACRE AND ACREAGE COST PER ACRE TO DEVELOP
PARKLAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-14 - ROBERTS
GROUP. A change of zone from R-1-8500 (single family
residential) to R-3 (multiple family residential) for 7.3
acres, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and
Hermosa Avenue - APN 202-17-010.
ORDINANCE N0. 736 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202-17-010 LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND
HERMOSA AVENUE FROM R-1-8500 TO R-3.
CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN REVISION.
64
64
65
66
70 `
104
At the request of Councilman Mikels, the proposed adoption
of the amendments to the San Bernardino County Solid Waste
Management Master Plan was deferred. Since the last City
Council meeting, we have requested that County staff contact
Councilman Mikels to deal with his specific questions. In
addition, a representative of the County Solid Waste Manage-
ment Division will he in attendance at the meeting to
respond to questions from the City Council concerning this
document.
City Council Agenda -6- February 4, 1981
RESOLUTION N0. 81-6 109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE REVISED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN.
B. DESIGNATE MEMBERS TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE
TO THE CIT ELT DI I I N THE C LI NI
CITIES. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
110
C. AMBULANCE DEREGULATION. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. 112
There has been some discussion in the West End of San
Bernardino County relative to de-regulating the ambulance
industry. At the present time, ambulance services are
governed by either a County Ordinance for unincorporated
areas or for cities such as Rancho Cucamonga which has adopted
the County Ordinance, or the services are controlled directly
by each city. In addition to establishing guidelines for
minimum levels of servfce, the cities have become involved
in the regulation of fees and charges for ambulance services.
At this point, the staff would like direction from the City
Council concerning how you wish to handle ambulance services
in Rancho Cucamonga.
1. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
A867 CITY CF RANCHO GUCAHONGA
NARP R VEN A! V E N C O R N A M E
~~00993 128` EARTCN DEVELOPMENT
~95 907F RAPATTONI CON ST
97 8946 UN[M ARK-M4 DONALD
vx:998 6729 LEAGUE OF CAI IE CITIES
00999 8081 RBD LION MOTOR CNN
01000 4991 HUNTS NINOON 71NTING
' OlOOI 6595 KISHFN. LNRIS.T tNE
__01002 6503 KIN AN IS CLUB OF, R C
~~01003 750 NATL IN9T OF CONM LEVEL
01004 4084 FESTIVAL OF ARTS
01009 1200 SANK OF AMERICA
01006 831 SAN BRNONO CO EMPLOY C
~~~,03007 4650 GNENCALE FEDERAL SAVING
' 01008 9483 NHIITAKBR ELECTRIC
01009 798° PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT S
5 H
IF. CITIES
N2NAN[S C
LiSHiNG CO
A H
uL PUtlL IC ADMIN
ICAN PIANNlNG ASSDC
EMIN ARS INSTITUTE
A FORD
ELETr BEVERLY
K EI EC NHOLESAIE
POR7 NEl01NG
CO FL AHER ICA Nt E SA
0 MUN PROOL'f,TS
LINE HARONARE
PRacucrs
ER BUSINESS CO RP pL
OP CONPANV
ENGINEERING
NhSLE PAPf.R CCRP
RAL MICROFILM SE RV
KS SPORTING G0005
RENTAL
/ARTHUR INC
NGTON E CRONE
NDNGA CO NATER DIST
NONGA PRINTING
[R-NENL[N INC
LAMS PRINTING• D
N NGr N
CH-POST CO
N INC
AH i1TLE 1N5 CO
lL IANNMO NER SERV
NALTER
L TELEPHONE CO
NT NEi
398.
6x000.
4.655.
,_ 385.
'^~a,: ~.' • "100.
.~~ .: ~' 286.
7c137.
....50 808.
~-500.00 "'
1x500.00
7.747.72 ,,.~i.
.. .._ 57.93- L
32.00- -~~ -" "
54x935.00- "
260.00-
1 .60.00-
1 8.88- ~..-.--'.
10~ 00 ~.~......_ _....
792.65
5,538.00
263.43
~.-519.96 _.;.. ___-, .__
945,32
2.80
. ... .171.03 .___.._ ____ __._
110.00
.. ;-14yy5.00 ._ _....._.
" !x15.76 ___ _
__. .__8.10 ._.-.._ . ._.
45.55
.._32.00 -..._.
..- 914.50
. ._.. _?42,74 ,
„'4.437.50
69.01
~2. 47.20
59.70
95.00
' 1.0 g3 ZI~C0
..-x:'" 418.7 6
~x. 1x135.14
. _. 25.00
103.81
70.00
1x384.28
NARK
OATE
R867 CI7Y OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
MARR N VEN N V E N C O R N A M E
'-05773 477'5 GREEN ROCK OAA OENS
05774 4907 FOIL EY. MN - PETTY CASH
05775 49BC HUB CONSTRUCTION SPEC
05776 .51 I0 ION
05777 5275 INTL C1iY NGT ASSOC
05728 610° J C PENNEY
05779 6591 KERB ER 8805 INC
05780 6591 KINKOS
"~~-05781 660C KBN6 ENGINEERS. L 0
05787 7175 CHRISTO PEER CHEVROLET:
_05788 J17.t NAGN ISON 6 HOEN _
05789 ~ ~718•I i~ARSP b M.C LENNAN INC ~~~
05793 - 7508 NAT IONAC LEAGUE OF GITI
05794 757E NATI TECHN iCAL INF SERV
05794 7657 PACESETTER BLDG LD INC
.__U5796 .,7_720 PALOM80. _N ICHAEL ...... _
EPAIR
OR INN
R
CENTER
COMM HOSPI~T
S URV+=YCR
NO COUNTY
L LAB
8390
If ECI<_ON
If GAS CO
8525
ORP
CRCO
INET CO
NG SVSTEM
C HAY
Y PROOUOT
4TION
SERVICE
i0N MEAL'T
TI.ON
0 INC
MEMTr A H
IUN1 NET
N4
MARR
GATE
20.Od~
2.735.34
134.93
101.16
3r 304.34
220,00
73.66
250.00
.34.47
40.11
101.70
2x456.30
142.25
156.00
196.92
2r93C.00
59.30
6r 863.61
1.348.82
50.00
•' 1r135.89-
4r481.40-
,. Ir500.00-
BOr580.72-
IrB00.00-
12.00-
7r489.07-
' 36.183.0:
r
52.
16.
77.
2.
13.
670.
~'~~ 3.266.
45.
4x212.
2r 216.
10x0200.
-- 233.
57.
27.
7.
' 405.
20.
..668.
C0 PY ae ~....;pre-e•tp.m ptt Bpi.
.~ _- ..
Oe Ner Wrib Aberp Tbip tiro-Por Mwadeuerbrs OTn Only
APPLICATION fOR AICOHOIIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) 1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO.
F rtment of Alcoholic Beverage Conbol ~ FEE NO.
15 O Street
& Wi
Sacramento, Calil. 95814 SYn Hexasaiino CP: $tLl! Bear
ae GEOGRAPHICAL
mn.nmy vnvrnn .pe..rorrr CODE 2En
The undersigned M1ereby applies for -.,~
~ Date
1¢emes described os follows: Issued
r Temp. Permit
T. NAME(57 OF APPLICANT(S) ' ;;!L.r'~ . -
~ ~~94?120
~~ Applied under Sec. 140~I ^
~' r.-T1O^$•Sfif CCRPORATIOir ~t`f+'2~'- Efective Dote: jgennnC.e Effective Dale:~~~~g~
` 6"E.T.RCD, Shellq 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
~. FEE
... - . IIC.
TYPE
PF]i: ^B7. S 25.'~ 2^
~, Name of Business yw yG
~-Eleven Market ,.'79
of Business-Number and Street
5. Lo
co
on
li
p
n
e
n
>-.v. BlsBa1~P. '
City and liP Code Coonry ~
~AC.10 (.ucaeon¢s 9~7C".Cnn BerTSnrdi rp
ECEIPT NO. --~Sn/S
TOTAL E
2cje~
.Premises licensed, 7. Are Premises Inside
Show Type of License iC-~~99 City Limits? YCe
8. Mailins Address (if-different /ram 5)-Number and Street '. fr.mpl /hrm)
P.:.. Box b5r0, Annuoi.-r, Cali:.. y::SOE' •' Perr.
•9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? lV l ~ 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisiam of the Alcoholic. 1,
s r_ -•: Beverage Control A<I or regulations of the Department per- ~`
s, corporation ~. s x' ~ ~ -~ mmm to the Act? Y
r g _e~rote ettactsaents on P--^r
11. Epploin a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an olmchment which shall 6e deemed part of This application.
14. Applicant agrees (a) Ihot any manager employed in on-sale licensed premises will have all the qualif cations of a licensee, and
' (bl that he will not violate or muse or oermit to be violated anv of the orovisiom of the Alcoholic Beveroae Control Act.
1]. STATE OF CAIIfDRNIA County of '~.._~}~ BP,TDer(SiIIO ._., „ Date .......1~2R~~~
Ur.na pvn er pn r..F po . rbv dq a v b•I nil r. end <wo Ill w vpli<w vl rbr vvpnm
nlrr<x el a ppl'<e prpe• •J r IA• largprn9 epplrr d~iY eurMrr•d 1 me\. uppr r bpFell; (}1 IAVI F•n rFa• •vd rM Iw
pln9 opPli< oM rlne rM rFer.vl vnd IFnr e<M1 nd ell al IM • • rFer mrvd. ()I rM1el •IAw rAen rA. ppll<
eppf< vFm y drn indm rM pplia ppbm bu• a b• nnJwtrd undw rrM lice In ter rFi<A rFi• vpb<v made'
1.1 rFel viA•• nrlpr appl pro r•d • ml•r mvd• •iJ.nrrFV peym• al v lev v (rrlrill v ogre nN i IFen Y WI
day Pr ..ein orb. da.Pr, erni.n erM 1 r ep rr errilyd r r • 0epe m ore n rlebl:• a pr•1•r a nr Iw rNi'p r,l 1 n•lerv v 1
• • q rpnrle vp lice pn rr rM1 rM1 a ro pe e e e e rv
Llrovd er iniun enp a dlror I r 1 ra muy r •irFU the v I' r litany nw rF ne n uLiny I'rabilily le
hpndnap ys rber Ib r n Dr a limrmn h• nirAdrurn 6y v p amr a rM
rF. o•penm.m. iR''; ~"~C^3LaNp~~tiCRs^GRA?It:i ~ ~...,...... r
ld. APPLICANT ~ ` 1 -,, C
SIGN HERE Z.~ r1 ~1/c-b..JL.Aw ~. .. ~ t~\ .... ... .. ............... ............ r
-~'Clrlfn`+$. :eaiirn, Asst.£ecye
r_- , APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
1~TATE OF CALIFORNIA Covnry of ,-,.,OSnnRe .. _. Dote ... ^~~p~fl+l _.
Nw neny el pn vrFm rigne • belay ni6n end • ~ 111 M• < IM G< vTrt• el IM • liw
mad p rb lapeinq nJV =ppLt adult ruMw ud ul mob rF r nfbr eppL< < bpbell ~ IT Fern M •Mpby me\vr vppL< nMp
dl i rb a nNvL<em•irl deu rb•d baler v.d r naer r nrlrr ppplitvm eend a~ Ivmden indrmud p rM uppw pprlren el rl.i•rvenliarien
Iw nrvl•wtM1 rwmlw Pb epWe<N by IM OinOer; Ill rMr vrAV en ml•aeppl ~anen er PrePe<N r mlu i medv I ridY rM pe vl a Iwn e v lullill
epu •qd i rAen y de.r gewdlM rM1• day vFrtF rM nJU eppb<enen •nn AIN rnF rM arpenmem v e pain v tlabirA v
wdwmu~nrw nlw enynn•dmp •el 4pndwor er b delreud a Inivr• enr enN I rmmbru; LI rMr rM hamlw pppl:<abvn may M rilAdnrn by virFw rM
prylwvnr er Me f rmn wnF ne rnMiM IiebililY re rM a•punm•nr,
- 16. Namq(0 of Lilenva•(sr 17. Apnatu ef~ 1 ^cpnseeral 1B. license Nnmber/s)
,.....
_...
COPY oe nsr d.weA-A.r.m .II s.Pi.a pe Neq WqM sbr. Thta Lim-!er N.ed9eenm olDu any
+LICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) 1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FIIE NO.
Deporment of Alcoholic Beverage Conhol -
1275 O Street
~ (~ $11Q ~Er & l+'iPB
t+0ir HOpII t'ld6 PJi111SC FEE NO.
Sacramento, ColiL 95814 aIIII jC2'II3t`r?in0
Ipr..nl<.aemrmae<,.rpxr ~_~ i~13CR ~ GEOGRAPHICAL
eoDE }515
the undersigned hereby applies {or
licenses described as follows: Oate
Issued
NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) .. c'..~s/ ~ ~ ~
:`JCE .Y w/g2
' Temp. Permit
_
$OlrO'~'iu90e '(.Zi~f02'd q,• 3 9000Ir)•O ~. AppBed under Sec, 110!4 •
+~"]
Effecfive Dale: • - '
EfFective Date:
" 7. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE LIC.
TYPE
.. NEW JC10.00 ],
ANNUAL FEE ~ ~~ 1t3...flO
~ ~ogm~fOBvsinms ~ ,~
5. Location of Business-Nvmber and $Ireet
10276 roothill 31vd.
Cityy appd Zip Code cf"1 ?O Coun
IiaLCL10 Cri1C :TOas'a 7 San .~'P.l ::af.'.SY1
RECEIPT NO. ~7SO
TOTAL
43%.. d~ ,
6. If Premises Licensed, 7. Are Premises Inside TCE
cs._... n._.. _o n,__._ re.. n_:~e
8. Moiling Addrms (if different from 5)-Number and Street ' tramp) Ieerml
9, Hove you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions bf the Alcoholic
Beverage Canlrol Act or regulations of the Deportment per-
. twining to the Act?
11, Esplain a "YES" answer to items 9 of 10 an an attachment which shall 6e deemed part of this application.
IZ. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee, a+d
(b) Ihnt he will not violatr or come or pmmit to be violated any of the proviuom of rho Almhotk 0ererage Conno( Acs.
1~. $TgTE OF CALIFGANIA County of S~ia„3P~iL~:R P+LT.iJ Dme ~' 3'-
une., nolq of P o<b wr+•^ wnm. + + ban. rrrrrn ontl + Ip x• 1 rh. bpN~=°r^. or n er IM .epx[om+, e
«F<x el IM applie nrvor mrtl rM nlm nrPlia dPlr rlha t•d Yl mob IM+ evPlianlro + b•FOIf; (II rxer M na+ •<Ia .
gain appLa enr4ne rxl n rFrgel end•9 e<F nd ell pl rbr rxer metl. 4u ~Pl d•+ a p«•e erFer rnnn •Ixr pPlh•
« bppllmm+ F•r e v db«+a rndnrnnr rM aPP6apnr+ a PPLtenrl bm~Mn•re+bn mndar•d rndx rM In+nubl far vFitF rnn eppli=erien ~ melr,~
(<I rF•1 IM rren+lrr upplr<nrien a n<.d •1 Mr•r i metl• ri+lY rM p •1 • lean ale IVlcll a «rd in I Inen n n«. INI
deYr q«•Ainq rh+ dbY a wx'ran Ins r~ brpplit•lion i+rgled r n IF. grporrm nl re a 9bin a IaPIi+F a pnl•rrM ~m nl IM any [r•drlol r•I M1•n+l•r•r e
inim•
Mlreud er nny endner el rromgwu rlsl rhor rM rrnn+l« •Pplkoean mar b• abadrenn M rirh« rM appllmm a rM e4a•nw• web nb r«ulr(ne Ilpbifirr re
Ma D•perrm•n+,
14. ApPIICANT y _, ~ l l ',~
SIGN HERE ..... .. .. .. .. . ., , .. (.. : _' .r.. ...:.....: .....:.__..._a.+j;..!.!~...
._
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
IS. STATE OF CAIIFOANIA County of ., ..~ ... .. ...:... Date .. „ . ~.... .. ..
undx p•nelrY e1 nriwr. w<F e•nen .-neu Jq•ewn epwpr+ b•I•.. t nifiw ene mre Ill W I IM LuM«. « «•rl.. elntn el IM twp«m Ik•n+ee.
rwrnatl in Me 1«q•inq r mix emanrren. dulr P«nbrwd r m•b rn'n r mix epplrmu•n e r bnell: of IFbrn M M.Ar meb+ evNnxln I rraM«
ell Mwnl In IM ena<Mdplin ulq drur:b•e Mls« erq r ml« prM bppl'nenl pnd'orrba indir•r•e «r 1M rpp•r peni N Ni+egplilxi.n
IM«r it w•n mndn i+ epw•rM h1 rM Dirn ; UI IMr •~M•r ntlx epPli[aM1m x p•Pn+ee Irendx +rmr m•d• a ri+lY IM mlmmr N e Iwn « e bfRll
q«m•nl erexN Inra rMn nmry MY• VrYdirrq rFrr dpf a wMrF IM b•m4r •pplrr•riM i• eld wqn IM D.palm•nr w • pain « n\lid
pnl«• r for a r ar+Amer••r rr ndxx a e d,l-eud a nr al•dnc• of rreMl•,or: 1<'i rxa rM rraMlx eppiM4on Jrpf bn. wJFe/a~46<~I:rF« .M
l J
•
1
2
3
4
5
s
7
B
9
10
11
12
13i
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22I
23
24
25
26
27
26
ANUREIVS & MOORE, [NC,
A Professional Corporation
9320 Baseline Road, Suite L
Alta Lama, CA 91701
714/989-1777
Attorneys for Claimant
In the Matter of )
GARY C, CHftiS•I•Y, )
Claimant, )
v. )
'the Cisy of Rancho Cucamonga )
and rite Count) of )
San Bernardino. )
P la .'j'ti
CIiY CF fA;;f,FiP Cl)CAM,Ci'iAR
Fi~N'I NISrn F. T!CPf
v1T Ir ~ ~: ~JtYr
~H v
6j81Sf~l~t~(112t3f9•S fi
J
CLAIM1t OF GARY C. CH RISTY'
PURSUANT TO SF,CTION 90i
OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNh1ENT CODE
ce', C. Cz-~;..~e~
~~~t~
c_,,, fi,~u..
TO: LACREN IVASSERMAN, CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA;
V . DENNIS WARDLE, CLERK OF SAN BERNARDINO COL'N'PY
Claimant is GARY G, CHRISTY of 6286 Cameo Stt•eet, Rancho Cucamonga,
California 91701.
On or about October 25, 1980, while operating his motorcycle on
3aseliae Road, and more specifically, while traveling East on Baseline, past
the intersection oC Hellman and immediately past Layton Street, claimant was
~seve rely injw•ed when his motorcycle struck a curb which extends from the
street as the strvet narrows prior to reaching the cornzr of Baseline Road and
Amathyat ,ivenue.
At the time and pl-,ce of the a(orcmentioned event, the City of Rancho
Curnmonga and the County of San Bernardino and its agmtts negligently failed
W provide <latmant with the safe use of a public street, to properly construct
h'
1 and design said curb extending from the street as if narrows, to remove the
2 dangerous condition after having actual and constructive knowledge of same, ,
3 and failed to provide adequate warnings regarding the existence of the dangerous
4 condition caused by the abrupt extension of the curb as the street narrows, all
5 of avhich has resulted in injury and suffering to claimant.
6 As a direct, actual and proximate result of [he aforementioned negligence
~ on the part of the above named governmental agencies, and each of them, claiman!
8 was injured in his healt!t, strength, and activity, sustaining severe and sub-
y stantial injuries to his body and, further, sustaining severe shock and injury
10 to the nervous system, all of which have caused and will cause him great mental
11 and p!tysical suffering all to his general damage in the amount of $1,000,000.
12 Further, claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that substantial
13 I Permanent injury will result.
14 As a further direct, actual and proximate result of the negligence of the
15 aforementioned governmental agencies, and each of them, claimant has incurred .
16 and will continue to incur hospital, doctor, medical, pharmaceutical, and other
17 related expenses in a sum which has not yet been fully and finally ascertained.
18 At the time of the injuries, claimant was employed in his occupation as a
ly ~ concrete worker, and, as a further direct, actual and proximate result of the
20 negligence of the aforementioned governmental agencies, and each of them, and
81 by reasor. of tltu injuries suffered by him, claimant will be prevented from
82 I resuming his ordinary course of employment and thus has lost and will continue
23 to lose :;ubstantia] earnings and earning capacity. Tice exact amount of earnings
24 lost bi date or which will I>e subsuquentl}' last in the future is not known to claimant
25 ut this timo.
26 As a further direct, actual and pru::imate result of the negligence of the ~.
27 aLn~ementinnud governmental agencies, and each of them, claimant has suffered
28 p~~nparty damage to his moWrcycle in a sum not yet finally and Cully ascertained. •
1 As a further direct, actual and proximate result of the negligence of the
• 2 aforementioned governmental agencies, and each of them, claimant will incur
3 substantial expenses and inconvenience should the aforementioned governmental
¢ agencies reject this claim without thorough and complete investigation as
5 directed by the California Government Cade in that an uttjustified rejection
6 will result in the need for special hearings and proceedings and thereby impose
7 upon claimant further delay, inconvenience, expense, and distress in his effort
g to recover the injuries and damages sustained.
g Claimant has been damaged as follows:
10 1. General damages in the sum of $ ],000.000.00 ;
11 i 2. Hospital, medical, doctor, pharmaceutical, and other related and
12 incidental expenses in a sum not yet finally and fully ascertained;
13 i 3. Permanent injury to health and person;
1¢ 4. Property damages in a sum not yet fully and finally ascertained;
• 15 5. Loss of present and past earnings and earning capacity in an amount
16 not yet finally and fully ascertained;
17 6. Contingent damages which may be incurred as the result of an
18 impropar rejection of claimant's claim with said agency in an amount not yet
19 finally and fully ascertained.
20 Any and all communications or notices regarding this claim are to be
21 sent to his
22 attorney, ROBERT D. ANDREWS, of ANDREWS & MOOAE, INC., addressed as follows:
23 GARY C:. C]I RISTY
c;o l2OBER'I' D. ANURENS Uated ,, 'm~~°~
2g ANDREWS Pr MOORS, INC.
9320 Baseline Road, Suite L p ~~-
G
o0 /
~
25 ,,
P.Ita Loma,C A 91701 ..
C,(/wr
,w] ru
_.~
Gr1RY R.~ ~ STI Y
26 ~/ ~
ANDREW & MOORS, INC.
27 ="~ i
28 i /i / ,~.~
"`'~
r
~~
2
`/
By: RUBRRT D. ANDRE VS
Attorneys for Claimant
n
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
MEMORANDUM
January 28, 1980
•
T0: City Manager 8 Members of the City Council
FROM: Assistant City Mana ger l~'
RE: Request From Sheriff's Department for Recognition
of Reserve Officer's Dedication.
The attached memo from Tom Wickum outlines the tremendous contributions
that have been made by the Sheriff's Department Reserve Officers to
the total operation of the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station. As
you are aware, the Reserve officers are not compensated for their efforts
and are required to maintain uniforms at their own expense.
To show the City's appreciation for the Reserve Officer's accomplishments
this past year, staff would recommend that b300.00 be appropriated
from the contingency fund to pay for the January 24, 1981 Installation
Oinner for the Reserve Unit. Staff would also recommend that Council
consfder,as part of the 81-R2 budget review sponsoring this annual
Installation Dinner and a September picnic for the Reserves and their
families. This kind of recognition for Reserve Officers is quite
common in other communities.
JR/vz
Enclosure
8
'' INTER-OFFICE MEMO
a
DATE Januar 27, 1981 TP`•~""'~
y un ecenewino
1
• FROM Thomas Wickum, Captain PHONE
Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station
TO Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT Recognition of Reserve Officers' Dedication
As you know, the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station main-
tains a Reserve Program presently consisting of 17 officers.
The Reserve Officers donate their services to the community
and are in no way compensated for their work. Each officer
is required to purchase and maintain his uniforms and equip-
ment at a personal cost of approximately $500 to $700 per
person.
During calendar year 1980 our Reserve Unit logged some
impressive statistics and provided a valuable service to our
corusunity. The following are the activities and hours worked
by the Reserve Unit.
• 1. 7,597 Hours worked (Equals eight and one-half Deputy
Sheriffs working for a one year period).
2. 27 Stake-outs.
3. 11 Civic Events (Parades, picnics, school functions,
etcetera).
4. Six major disasters (Four floods, two fires).
5. Two searches (One involving a missing girl on Easter
Sunday).
6. Two murders.
7. One KKK Rally (Fontana City mutual aid assist).
8, Swift Water Team
I feel that the dedication and accomplishments of our Reserve
Officers should not go without recognition. Therefore, I am
requestine funding from the City to sponsor a picnic for the
Reserves and their families during the month of September and
then an installation dinner for the officers and their wives
in the month of January to install the new administrative
officers for the year and to give them the thanks and recogni-
ti.~n they deserve.
With your authorization, in the future those two items will be
addressed in the yearly budget. On January 24, 1981 we had an
eta ~eaooo ner. an
Memo to Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
January 27, 1981
Page ltao
installation dinner for the Reserve Unit. ltuenty-two or •
twenty-three people attended this function. Although it is
after the fact, it is requested that the City sponsor this
dinner. It is estimated that the cos[ is under $300.
Any consideration given this request will be sincerely
appreciated.
TW:jes
•
•
~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
January 28, 1981
T0: City Manager d Memhers of the City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager'
SUBJECT: Request from Sheriff's Department to Construct Counter
and Shelves for Reception Area.
J
Staff would recommend that Council approve the attached request to
construct a counter and shelves to maximize space in the reception
area and accommodate the installation of the electronic equipment.
Staff would also recommend that Council award the projects to
John Vonk for an amount not to exceed $500.00. Staff requests that
funds be appropriated from contingency to cover this expenditure.
JR/vz
enclosure
.Q
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
DATE January 26, 1981 uh u`~:s ~~~
• FROM Thomas Wickum, Captain PHONE -
Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station
TO Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT Construction of Counter and Shelves for Reception Area
Now that our electronic equipment has been installed in the
reception area of the Sheriff's Office and due to the lack
of space available, it is requested that a counter and
shelves be constructed in order to maximize the space avail-
able. We have received two bids from local contractors.
They are set forth below.
1. John Vonk, State License No. 376806. Telephone:
(714) 986-0937.
PIr. Vonk's estimate for a formica finish counter
top is $450.
2. Bi11 Dusek. Telephone: (714) 982-7070.
Mr. Dusek's estimate is $450 with the formica top.
$325 with a wood top counter.
It is recommended that Mr. John Vonk be given the contract
and that $500 be authorized for its construction.
TW:jes
IAIM T000 AF. 1/]]
CITY OF RAI~f-IO Cl'CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 4, 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds
Parcel Map 4804 - located on the south side of 9t h. Street at Lion
OWNER: Daniel J. Salter 6 Michael Todd
1054 5. Robertson 81 vd., Suite 202
Los Angeles, California 90035
Performance Bond (Road) $40,000
The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved
plans and i[ is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements.
Tract 9403 - located north of Highland Avenue and east of Mayberry Avenue
OWNER: Olympus Pacific Corp.
2110 Kafella Avenue
Anaheim, California 92803
Faithful Performance Bond (Water) 41,000
Faithful Performance Bond (Sewer) 13,000
Cash Staking Bond 2.350
Certification from J.P. Kapp, Engineer, indicates that all final monuments have
been se[ and he has been paid in full.
Tract 9423 - located on the Wes[ side of Beryl South of Base Line
OWNER: Coral Investment Inc.
540 S. Pasadena Avenue
Glendora, California 91740
Fai [h ful Performance Bond (Road) $137,500
con [i nued...
13
Staff Report - Release of Bonds
Fehrua ry 4, 1981
Page 2
Tract 9480 - located South of Base Line, Wes[ of Turner
OWNER: Kent Land Co.
17881 Sky Park North
Irvine, California 92714
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $126,000
Faithful Performance Bond (Water) 42,000
Faithful Performance Bond (Sewer) 61,000
Tract 9521 - located on the Wes[ side of Archibald North of Hillside
OWNER: Lewis Homes of California
P. 0. Box 670
Upland, California 91786
Faithful Performance Bond (Landscaping) $78,000
l J
The landscaping and irrigation system have been constructed in accordance
with approved plans and it is recommended that [he Cify Council accept said •
improvements.
•
1 fl
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOnG1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 4, 1981 '
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 6011, Improvement Agreement
and Improvement Security
The subject map was tentatively approved by the City Engineer
June 16, 1980 for the division of 9.65 acres of land into
two parcels located on the southwest corner of Baker and Foot-
hill in the R-3 and A-1 zones.
The subdivider has presented an agreement and bonds to insure
installation of off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance $4,600.00
Labor and Material $2,300.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
accepting Parcel Map 6011, improvement agreement and improvement
security.
Res ec tfu lldy^ su ~mitted,
, /
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
-5
RESOLUTION ~NO. S)- 17
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6011,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0.6011)
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 6011, submitted by
J.A. Musser & M.E. Mi kels, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the
west side of Baker, south of Foothill, being a division of Lots 6 and
11, Cucamonga Fruit Lands as recorded in Book 4, page 9 Records of
Sari Bernardino County was approved by the City Engineer of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on dune I6, 1980; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6011 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptahle
improvement security by Acacia Construction Co., Int. as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and
said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same
• are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 6011 be and the
same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present
same to Lhe County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
~l0
f Af'2C.tL MAr IVU, bVl I
C/TY OF ~FgNINO IUTAA'oN6A~ IOUNl/
p~ J/N dERNq.(O/NO ~ J1:OTE ~R !<!/~ifN/q
a ~ `u.M.wH w ~ r..V-
vtfn;~iaiw ~a sr,.iE n~ e..eii+.~rii
nFA~G c4, N.Q7
r. ~ ro.~r~..T~.w..•,
i iw u6uNi FYO
NIIT
/,w.~G. /~/J s ~.siGS 7w~. ~ l xne.w
(/>/L/r/F3
1EWE? -~'~~'n ~~ 9 K f+^Y.
R6c TK - ~ JfN UL/.~. /Y'3aN
r. Musses-P
~~ ~%
~ f~' ~;~ ~~; pr's>~. /-~1::
~y _.J- u•- _ ~S
i - `~ ~.~ ~' ~ /- - I,.
/, ~G- _~' _ ~ ~ ~~_ ,~~~'~.~ I
; - 7`.` ~~ _.~ ~ - J ~
~,:. - - - ~
i; ~~
~w.ei~an ~ w awn ~~ - -l ~~ ~~ ~ i ~ ..-' -~~~ ~I
.._ .. _.
rr..r.e tiGrav 1 ~ MAW ~ ..,.rE
aiciiyrrr AfAP
CITY OF RANCHO CUC:1901iGA .
RIPROVEMEHT AGREEMENT
f0R
PRRGEL 47RP N0.
aNON ALL ttEN BY TNESE PRESEI7T5: That this ag reemen[ is made and entered
into, in conformance with the provisions of the PL nits pal Code and Regulations
of the Li ty of Rancho Cucamonga, State of [aliforn ia, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred [o as the City, by and between said City and
e f~ ct fnm anv. l6e
hereinafter referretl to aai the Developer.
NITNESSETH:
THAT, l1HEREAS, pursuant to said Lode, Developer has requested approval by the
City of Parcel Map Number 6011 in accordance with the
provisions of the report of the Li ty Engineer thereon, and any amendments
thereto; located R/S of Baker, S/0 Foa thin
and,
NNEREAS, the City has established certain requt rements to be me[ by said Dev-
eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel map: ana,
1M EREAS, the execution of Lhis agreement and pasting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and approvetl by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pupose of securing
said apProvel;
t10R, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by an0 between the City and the Oevelo per
~°` •"' "" - - as follows:
1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all •
' improvements described on Paqe 3 hereof within nine months from the
date hereof, as Der Secit on 2.12 of Ortlinance Na. 28.
2. The term of tM5 agreement shall he nine months commen cin9 on the date
of execution hereof by the C7 Ly. This agreement shall De in de/ault on
the day followfng the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tam
has been extended az hereinafter provided.
3. Tha Developer may raquest additional time in which to complete Lhe pra-
_ visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to
the default date, and including a statement of circunstances of necessity
for additional time. In considers lion of such request, the City reserves
the right to review the provisions hereof, including conic rvctipn standards,
cast ezt smote, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
0. I( the Oevel oiler fails or neglects to cdnpl'y with the provisions of this
agreement, the city shall Dave the rf ghi ac any time to cause said provisions
to Ge completed Dy any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said
"''"' Developer and/or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing.
5. Encroachment pe mits sha 11 be obtained by the Developer from the office of
the City En9 sneer prior to start of any work within the public right of way,
and the Developer shall conduct such work in Tull compliance with the re-
gviatlons contained therein. Ilan-compliance may result in stopping pf the
ro rk by the City, and assessment of [he penalties provided.
6. public right of way improverent work required shalt be constructed in con-
Ioimance with approved imps vanent plans, Standard Specifi<a ti ohs, and
Standard Drawings and any special amendnen is [hereto. Construction shall
include any transitf ohs and/or other incidental work deemed necessary for
drainage or public safety.
•
RCE12~
~4
• Page 2
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Nork done within existing streets shall be diN gently pursued to comple-
7
.
tion; the LiSY shall hav¢ [he right to complete any and all work in the
event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred fran the Oevel oper and/or his contractor by any lawful
means.
The Developer shall be responsible for reel acemenL, relocation. or re-
8
.
moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with
' the requireo work to the satisfaction of [he Li [y Engineer and ih< owner
of the water system.
9. The Developer shall be responsfble for removal of all loose rack and
other debts; from the public right of way resulting from work done on
the adjacent property or within said right of way.
10. The Developer shall plant and nu in tain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Oevel opmen[ Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer So guarantee
cpmpleti on of the terms of ibis agreement shall be subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement
security shall be not less than the amount shown bel qw:
' IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED:
faithful Performance Band 44.600.00
' ' .+-w. ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ Material and Labor Bond 52.300.00
•
IN NTTNES6 HEREOF, Me parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opPOSi [e their signatures:
DEVELOPER
y, Qj~.a,a~ DATE: ~ 13 8/
BY: 11
-- ~
d-v--~ • GATE:
- BY:
MITNESS:~ _DATE: 1 I W
CITY OF RANCHO ULAMONOA, CALI FOftNIA .
a municipal corporation
.;.1... ~..<.-. : --, -. .;,. .~.,,. . .CITY CLERK
r
RCF12B
t
ISIPROI'E::EHT AGREl9EN2 PAGE
' cI P' OF RANCHO LVCA.40NCA
~ LOSStRULIIOn AND BOND ESTINAtE
ENLROACIL4ENT PER4IT FEE SCIIEDULE •
(AteacM1 [o "Inapec toe's Copy")
GATE: 12/24/80 PERNII N0. COlD'UTEO BY BOb 5<drb9 mu9h
File aef ermce pM 6011 eiey braving Nds 387
NOTE: Does no[ lnc lode current fee fo[ yr it ing permit or yavment replace-
mvnt depot its.
CONStRVCtION COET ESTTNATE '
ITEM VANTITY LRlIT M f05 A10 .'
P - fl" .R L.F.
P. f.. Curb only fi" C. F. L.F.
A.C. Berm (5200 min) L.F.
c" P. r.. f. 5ldevatk 507 'S. F. I. ii 88].00
6" Drive Apnreach 156 S.P. 2.70 328.00
fl" P. fl. f.. C[nn Gnc[er S. F.
St ree[ Excavac tan C.Y.
imoorced Enban kment C: Y.
Pre n n of Sub ratle
i0 E.F.
~.e 1
!n 1
o 5. .
A.C. (over
l 00 c iON
A. f.. 1900 to U00 tonal ion
A. under 500 00 m TON
tler a00 roe TON
PatcM1 A. f.. ( r n9M1 E.F.
1" Tbick A.C. Over lav S. F.
f v EA.
Ad'uet Sever C.O. to Cade FA.
AJ uzt Na ter valves m Grad EA.
t 1 F.A.
Streat El ns
5[reet Trees
Re val Of A.L. avenent
100 EA.
EA.
.35
00
Rf [
RETpiNt% WA LI.
flLOfhT1AL S' L.F.
LTNDSCAPE R IRRIGAflON L.S.
TOTAL CONSTRVCTION COST 4.173.00
m.r -rs».r•• .. .. -...^++. INSPFCTiON FEES
~ITE4 Op TY IL`I V N
CO.YSTRUCTION InSPELTION
of Cnnsrru<tion Cost Est SSat
L.S.
L.S.
1.5.
P1t""°:T i"'T nH iYyrVri
PEP'H Nt:AT PTV E`I F.VT RF. PI,pf,FYF.NT L, F.
ET00. `IATf:R IA I. SY RL:IIT-OF-6'pY FA
I. TOFAL 1N5 PF.CT ION FEES 5(208.65)
II. CO!O'ACTION TEST FEES ,$
IIi. IOS COnTINGENCIF.S 5 411__
IV. DEE[GN FEES ({OS of Tn tai Lon ai r uttl9n Cost Fal lmat e) .
TOTAL $d59n M
Fa ltM1ful P¢r(n rnance Band 54.600.00
Material and labor Bond $2,300.00
Naineenan<e Bond g
Cach Nonuuenting Depeeft $
n~
Bond No, 2063027
' Premium ~iA-56-
FAITHFUL PE AFO MfANCE 00lID
1'-
a:
w'M EREAE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, ana pCAE (q EON $TRO Er ION EGMPnNY iNC
(hezei ra Eter designated as "p ancvpa l") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal ag: ees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated 19 R1 en Gift ed as
project arce a0 o.-6IIT1-~f/S~T Bake1'7Zjb ~ootl~i II
rs hereby referred to antl made a part hereof; and,
. 41HEAEAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NON, THEREFORE, we the principal and GAFE[0 SNSURANEE COMPANY OF
MIER IEA as surety, are held and
fvrmly hound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
"City"), in the penal sum of lour thousand six hundred
-Dollars ( A,600 UU ) lawful
money wf the Dnited States, for the payment of which sum well and
Lruly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that iE the above
bounded pzincipa 1, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and perform Lhe covenants, condi-
kions and provisions in the said agreement and any al Gera [ion
thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all respects accord ing to th ei: true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its o[Eicezs,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
Evll force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney s Eees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be !axed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
crnsion of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
ag rerm ent oz to the work to be perEo zmed thereunder or the spec-
ilications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its
obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any
such change, extension of time, alteration or addition [o the
terms of the agreement or to the work or to the speeif ica [ions.
IN wITNCES WHEP F.oF, this instrument has be¢n duly executed
by the principal and surety above named, on danuarv A
19~_,
ncnctn cnnsrrsucnon cm'~PnN~jgc.
6AfFC0 IISURANEE COMPANY OF AHEC p'A
ACCT]
Marsha C. Garn son, Ito rneyn n-~%t
a~
Hond No. 2063027
Premium Included in•
perfomence Bond
LABOR AND MATE RIALMEN BOND
WNEAEAB, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and AfAC IA CWISTRUCTION CCQIPANY 111C.
(hezeina Eier designated as 'pri ncr pa have en teretl into an
agreement whereby principal agrees io install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated 19 81 , and Sdentified as pro-
ject Parcel Mao N r
4s hereby cafe rzed to an ma e a part hereof; and,
WHEREABr under Lhe terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the pe rfozmance of the work, Lo file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims co which zefe rence is made in Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Pazt 4 of Division 3 of the
Civil Code of Che State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the node rsigned a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcen tractors, laborers, material-
men and ocher persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
eareement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of two [hound thr hu ndr d
Oolla rs ! P_JD(1 DO ), for mate rla la
utni shed or aD r the: eon of any kind, oz £or amounts due under
the DnemploymentVInsv ranee Act with ze spa ct to such work ox labor, •
that said aurecy will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
amount hereinabove set forth, and also in ease suit is brought
upon this Dond will pay in addition to the face amount thexeo£,
casts and rea sonabl¢ expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's tees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the tour t, and Go be taxed
as costs and to be included in the jadament therein zende tad.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this Dond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
co zpo rations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 3082) of Part 9 of Division J of the Civil Code, eo
as to give a right of action co them or their assiq ns in any suit
brought upon this bond. '
Bhou ifl the tend itien of this bond be Eu lly performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, och ezwi se it shall De
and remain in full force and effect.
The sure ty hereby stipulates and agrees chat no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying she same shall in
any manner affect its obligacio ns on this bond, and it does here-
hy waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad-
dition.
IN IJI T'1Ii55 p'II F.REOF, this lnstiument hds been duly execUied
by the principal and sv racy above named, on January 8
19 H'•
ACACIA COIISTeUCTI ON CCMP 4HY, INC.
A 2~_._.:.--
SAFEC~~CE CIXIPANY OF AMEC ICA
Marsha .ice gin son,~Etomey ~~` Fect
AEEIi
~P
CITY OF RAI~7-10 Cl1G1MONGA
STAFF REPORT
•
DATE: February 4, 1961
TO: City Council and City Manager
FP.OFf: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 6585 and Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
The subject map, submitted by R. C. Industrial Co. Inc.
was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on
January 14, 1980. Parcel Map 6585 is an industrial subdivision
of 16.8 acres consisting of 7 lots with existing buildings
located on the east side of Milliken, south of 8th Street within
recorded Parcel Map 5760.
Except for cost of sidewalks on Milliken, bonds and.agzeement
for off-site construction have been included in bond amount for
Parcel Map 5760. A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement is attached to guarantee construction of sidewalk
on Milliken.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Parcel Map 6585 and accept Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement for the sidewalk on Milliken.
I`~XR/e spectfully submitted,
w\ c~
~~
LBH:BK:jaa
•
Attachments
a3
RESOLUTION N0. 81 - 1 ~
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6585,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0.6585)
REAL PRGPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 6585, submitted by R.C.
Industrial Co., and consisting of 7 parcels, located on the east side of
Milliken, west of 6th Street, being a division of Parcel 2 and 6 of
Parcel Map No. 5760, as recorded in Book 54 pages 53-56 was approved by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission on January 14, 1981;
and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6585 tis the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said CS ty have now
been met by entry into alien agreement by R.C. Land Company as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said lien agreement submitted by
said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said lien agreement on behalf of the City of
• Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map
Number 6585 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is
authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 1981.
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Laurin MM, Ala sse rman, City Clerk
a~
u
~~
v
°a° 5°g~
M .~ 3:+b:
`:i8`o d - ~wZ--~
"' ;9kT7 qq4°"" o ~°
~ I
O - '..i. .:n ~ ~G
Q- - _ ~~
N i ~ > _ ..
~ _
_. _t
y ~ ~k
a - 8 h
c
_ 1 i~
> ~ _ ~i)~_
o. ~ Li: ~;' Cif ^*„ ~.
G
Ne of ~1° ~
J - - - ~ ~ __ _ _ ' K ' 99999
~i
W ~ „y ,, i -~ - --
,~ ` ~ ~ ~ I~
U J - -
z ~ _ r
a ail.... i ~'~ .i - ? ~ ?
.e~.~ S~ ~Y J _, q•
W J .I ~ wi rn ~C
> e I ~\
- - (~ 133!14 ~[
Q ab I .e .1 'l:~~.
~M
ar+y
~ . lr~i~n ~
' ~
°
~ ° .1
Z ni
nl^ i~ i '
:
j
'
~ --
:~ --
i.
I I
I ~-
-
~ . -
d
~ : ~
~ -
~~
i ~:
'uu
N
f
w
i=
0
N
w
a
I~
.a
0
m
i
I
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
and
WHEN RECOPDEO MAZL T0:
CITY CLE R%
CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA
9320-C Base Line Road
Post OE£ice Boz 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEt7ENT
TMIR AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 29th day o£
Tanua ry 1981, by and between R. C. INDUSTRIAL
COMPANY (hereinafter refe [red [o as "Developers"),
and the CZTY OP RA.YCBO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corp0 ration
thereinafter referred to an "City'), provides as Eollowa:
NMEPEAB, as a general condition precedent to the is nuance of
a building permit for development, [he City requires the cam true Lion
' ~ of missing off-site street improvements, including sidewalk, adjacent
to the property to be developed; and, •
WHEREAS, Developers desire to postpone cons true Lion of
sidewalk on Milliken Avenue until a later dace, as deeerminad by the
City; and,
WNEREAB, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided
that Developers enter into this Ag[eement requiring Developers Co
construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand
to do so by the City, which said AgreemenC shall also provide Nat the
City may consexuet said improvements if the Developers fail or neglect
to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property
.. hereinaE ter described as security For the Developers' pe rfo rmanca, and
any repayment due City.
NOW, TN EREFORE, THE PAPTIEE ACREE:
1. Developers hereby agree thaC they will Lns tall off-gi Ce
street improvements, consisting of Eidewalk on Milliken Avenue, in
accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances, resolutions,
rules and regulations of the City in eEfecc at the time of the installation
Baid lmprovcments shall be installed upon and along [he emir ro'
frontage on Milliken Ava nue.
~~
2. The installation of sa:3 improvements shall be eomple ted
not later than one (1) year following written notice to Developers
from the City to comne nee installation of the same. Installation of
said improvements shall be at not expense to the City.
3. In the event Developers fail or refuse to complete the
rnaCalla Lion of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any
time thereafter, upon giving Developers written ne rice of its Ln tendon
to do so, enter upon the props zty hereinafter de acribetl and complete
said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the
City Erom Developers.
<. To secure the performance by Developers of the terms
end conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment co City
of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improvements
upon default by Developers hereunder, Developers do by these pre senls
grant, bazgainr sell and convey to the City the following described
real property situated in the City of Ramho Cucamonga, County of San
• Bernardino, State of California, !o-vii:
Parcel Nap 6585 as recorded in Book_
of Parcel Maps, Pages, records of said
County.
5. This conveyance is in bast, howeverr for Ghe purposes
described above.
6. Nov, therefore, if the Developers shall faithEu lly
perform all of the acts and chings by them to be done under [his
Agreemen[, then th15 Conyeydpee 9hd 11 b2 vOld) O[haLNl9e, iC Dhdll
remain in Eu it force and effect and in all re ap ecm shall be considered
and tees ted as a mortgage on the real pope rty and the rights and
ob Ligations of the parties with respec[ thereto shall be governed by
the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any
other ap plicnhlc s[a to te, per mining to me regages on real property.
]. This Agrecme nt shall be binding upon and shall inau[e
• to the benefit c'. the heirs, execu to[s, administrators, successors and
assigns of each of the parties he [e to.
C~ 7
n
u
8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement
as a mortgage, the to [rti "Developers" shall mean "morigagors" and the
City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms ate used in the Civil
Code of the State of California and any other statute pe [ta in ing to
mortgagee on real property.
9. If legal Action is commenced to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is
an ti Clad to recover from Develops rs hereunder or to foreclose the
right of the Deve lepers to redeem the above-described property from
the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entiCled
to recover its costa and such re asonahle attorneys' fees as ahall ba
awarded by the Cour[.
IN NITNEEE NHEREOF, the parties he[e to have ezecu tad thin
Agreement on the day and year first above written.
.._ CITY: DEVELOPERS:
CITY OP RANCHO CDCANONOA, R. C. In tlustri al Company •
CALIFORNIA. a mW icipal
corporation
BY:
PHILLIP D. ECHLOS
Mayor Jo n J. O'Donnell
ag ivq General Partner
ATTEST:
LAV REN M. wASSERMAN
City Clerk
•
^~
CPI'Y OF RAhCI 10 CUCAMONC'v1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 4, 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract
and Lien Agreement for 8623 Etiwanda (D .R. 80-28)
The applicant, Joe T. Guiders, is proposing to construct two
14,000 sq.ft. industrial buildings on 4.4 acres in the M-R
zone located at 8623 Etiwanda Avenue.
A real property improvement contract and lien agreement has
been submitted by applicant in compliance with conditions for
D.R. 80-28 accepted by the Planning Commission on August 13,
1980. A copy of these conditions is attached.
RECOMMENDATION
IC is recommended that the City Council accept said Real Pro-
perty Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizes
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign the same, and directs the
City Clerk to record the same in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
Re spectfuily submitted,
LBH:BR:jaa
Attachments
a5
RESOLUTION N0. QI-!5
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RP.NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM JOE T. GUI DERA, JR. AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the conditions established by the
Planning Conmission for O.R. 80-28, located at 8623 Etiwanda at
its meeting of August 13, 1980;
WHEREAS, Joe T. Gu idera & Joyce L. Guiders provided a Real
Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement with respect to same,
a copy of which Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference;
NCW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in
the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
30
~;.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
and
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERIC
CITY OF RANCY.O CUCAMONGA
9]20-C Rase Line Road
Post Office Box 80]
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91]]0
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this aJ rtl day of
Senuazy , 19a r by and between Joe T. Guide ra, Sz.
and Soyce L. Guides (hereina Eter referred to as "Developara"), and
,_ the CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, a municipal corpo [a [i op
(hereinef ter referred to as "City"), provides as follows:
WNEREAEr as a general condition precedent to the issuance of
a building permit for residential development, Ue City requ lrea the
• construction of mission ofF-site sire et improveme ntsr including curbs,
gutters and pavement, adjacent to the property to be developed; and,
WHEREAS, Developers desire to postpone construction of such
improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided
- that Developers enter into chis Agreement requiring Developers to
construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand
to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the
City may constzmt said improvements iE the Developers fail or neglect
to do so and that the City shell have a lien upon the real property
hereinafter de ac ribed as security for the Developers' peeforman ce, and
any repayment due City.
NOW, THEREFORE, TIIE PARTIES AGREE:
1, Developers hereby ayrae chat they will install off-site
street improvements, inc lutliny curbs, quite rs and pavement, in a<co[dan<e
and compliance with all applicable ord inancea, resolutions, rules and
rcyulntion. of the City in effect at ehe cime of the in sta 11 atron.
Said imp[nveme nts shall be installed upon and along the westerly 50'
of developers pro pe riy hereinafter described.
~l
,.
3. The installation of said improvements shall be eomple Lad
not later than one (11 year following written notice to Developers
from the City to conmence installation of the same. Installation of
said improvements shall be at not ezpenae to the City.
3. In the evens Developers fail or refuse to complete the
installation of said improvements in a timely meant z, City may at any
time thereafter, upon giving Develops ea written notice of its inteniien
to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete
said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the
City from Developers.
<. To secure the performance by Developers o£ the to rma
and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City
of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improvements
upon defau l[ by Developers hereunder, Developers do by these preaenls
grant, bargain, sell and convey Lo the City the Following described
real property altos ted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of Sa~
ae [nardino, Slate of California, to-wit:
lot 130, Tract Number ]103, Fontana Arrow etc.
5. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the pu rpoaea
described above.
- 6. Now, the refute, if the Developers shall faithfully
perform all of the aces and things by them eo be done under this
Agreement, then this conveyance shall ba void; otherwise, it shall
remain in Evll force and effect and in all re specta aha 11 be con aidered
and tree [ed as a mortgage on Ue real pope rty and the rights and
~aY ... ... ....
obligations of the parties with re spec[ [hereto shall be governed by
the provisions o[ the Civil Code of the State of California, and any
other applicable statute, pertaining Go mortgages on real preps rty.
~. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall lnsu re
to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
assigns eE each of the parties hereto.
3?
e. To the extent required to give affect of this Agreement
as a mortgage, the term "Dave lopers^ shall mean "mortgagors' and the
City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil
Code of the State of Ce lifornie end any other statute pertaining to
mortgagee on real property.
9. IE legal action is commenced to enforce any of the
p[ovisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is
entitled to recover from Oeve lope rs he [eunder o[ to fo[eclose the
right of the Developers to redeem the above-described property Erom
the mo [[gage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover its costs and sorb reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be
awarded by the Court.
IN NITNESE WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the day and year Ei[at above written.
• CITY: DEVELOPERS: "
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA,
CALIFORNIA. a municipal
ca [potation / ~ =~
I~// '
PHILLIP D. GCHLOS SER /
ATTEST:
Maya[
LAUREN M. WAEEEFMAN
t
33
u STAFF REPORT.W,
January 30, 1981
T0: City Manager and Members of City Council
FROM: Assistant City Ma nage~'
SUBJECT: Recommendations and Conclusions of Rancho
Cucamonga Financial Task Force
At its last scheduled meeting of January 15, 1981, the Rancho Cucamoga
Financial Task Force received in its final form a matrix of potential
revenues and projects that could be undertaken with these revenues.
The Financial Task Force divided the potential revenues into four
categories of (I) Affordable Housing, (2) Federal and State Grants,
(3) Assessment Districts and (4) Subventions/Miscellaneous Revenues
and Grants. In addition the Financial Task Force requested that a
summary evaluation of each potential revenue be prepared indf cats ng
the corresponding advantages and disadvantages of each revenue.
The revised matrix and summary evaluatf on are attached for your
information, as well as some pertinent comments from Joe DiIOrio
addressed to the Financial Task Force.
In addition to receiving the revised matrix and summary evaluation
of potential revenues, the Financial Task Force adopted a motion
recommending that the City Council evaluate the feasibility of
hiring permanent staff to be assigned to monitoring and pursuing
various types of grants. As part of that motion, the Financial Task
Force recommended that the City seriously consider the feasibility
of establishing a Redevelopment Agency. In addition to the Task
Force's motion, Councilman Frost suggested that members of the committee
remain on call to assist the City Council if the need arises.
Staff sincerely appreciates the time and effort spent by the Financial
Task Force in sharing their expertise and expressing a common concern
about the tough financial considerations ahead for the Li ty of Rancho
Cucamonga. Staff would also recommend that the Financial Task Force's
recommendations be given consideration as part of the normal budget
process.
JR/vz
Enclosures
sy
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1. Section 312 Rehabilitation Loans
Rehabilitation loans available from HUD to bring property up to
local code standards. Eligible properties must be in federally-
aided Community Development Block Grant, Urban and Homesteading
areas. Preference is given to low- and moderate-income applicants.
2. CH FA Direct Loans
CH FA sells tax-exempt revenue bands. CH FA makes construction and
rehabilitation loans of up to 95 percent to profit motivated developers,
and up to 100 percent to nonprofit and public agencies for multifamily
developments, mixed income projects and housing for the elderly. Each
project must contain a mix of units at the market rate and units sub-
sidized through HUD's Section 8 program. At least 30 percent of the
dwellings must be for very low income residents (defined as an income
not exceeding 80 percent of the area median income).
3. CH FA "Ho-H i~'-"Pro gram
• The City must make an application to the California Housing Finance
Agency (CH FA) to become a "designated" city, which would allow City
residents to become eligible for the CH FA "Home Ownership/Here
Improvement" Program.
Under this program, the CH FA purchases mortgage loans at below market
interest rates on single-family homes (1-4 dwelling units) from
private mortgage lenders. Savings are then passed on to low- and
moderate-income home buyers. The mortgages must be insured by Lhe
FHA, guaranteed by the VA, or coinsured through private market insurance.
CH FA encourages certain types of mortgages under this program by
offering incentives to mortgage lenders. The agency will rebate 1/4
to 1 percent of the mortgage loan amount to lenders who deliver a loan
which:
is on property which has been moved to a new site and
rehabilitated since August 1, 1976 and on which have been
made improvements amounting to at least 25 percent of the
property's appraised value;
is a multi-unit subsidized residential structure for which
alternate financing is unavailable;
•
35
Affo rdahle Housing (Continued)
Page Two
is a large family residential structure which is
to be occupied by a large family;
is made to a family displaced by governmental action
or as a result of a natural disaster; or
is made in a neighborhood preservation, neighborhood
improvement, urban renewal, or code enforcement area.
4. Mark-Forgo Residential Rehabilitation Act
This Act authorizes cities, counties, housing authorities, and
redevelopment agencies to issue tax exempt revenue bonds to finance
residential rehabilitation in designated areas. Bond proceeds can
6e used to bring property up to local rehabilitation standards,
make general property improvements, refinance loans on rehahil itated
property, or for architectural, appraisal, origination and other fees.
•
The local agency is obligated to make public improvements to upgrade
the area and to enforce the rehabilitation standards in 95 percent of the
residences in the area. There may be a time limit of two years to accom-
plish the work. Through a public participation program, areas are
chosen which contain a large number of deteriorating residential building
but where, with sufficient loans, rehabilitation of nearly 100 percent
of the homes is likely. Rehabilitation of buildings located outside
of a designated rehabilitation area can be financed under this Act if
they are to be occupied by low- or modera te~•income persons.
5. Section 8. Lower Income Rental Assistance
HUO program that provides rental subsidies to low-income households.
HUO makes up the difference between what a lower-income household can
afford and the fair market rent for an adequate housing unit. Local
pu 6lic housing agencies administer the existing housing program certi-
fying eligible tenants, inspecting the units proposed for subsidy and
contracting with approved landlords for payment.
6. Rental Housinn Construction Program
Authorized by AB 333, this program provides assistance to developers of
rental units, provided a percentage of the units are set aside for
persons of very low and low income. Under this program, HUD may "write
down" the development costs of low income units within rental develop-
ments financed by the California Housing Agency (CH FA) or a local
•
3~
Affordable Housing (Continued)
Page Three
entity offering below market interest rates. The Rental Housing
Construction program is funded for 5R2 million. Priority is given
to rental developments which are of the lowest possible cost;
incorporate innovative design and construction techniques as well
as higher densities; complement a local program to increase housing
supply for low- and moderate-income households; receive private or
pu6l is contributions of funds, services, land or CDBG funds; and
utilize funds in the most efficient manner to produce the maximum
number of units.
7. Homeownership Assistance
This program, soon to be initiated as a pilot project by HCD, will
allow the State to assist a limited numher of homebuyers who could
not otherwise afford to purchase a home. As part of the 5100 million
package authorized by A8333, the state is authorized to spend 53.5
million to provide up to 49 percent of the purchase cost of a dwelling
unit, as long as it does not reduce the down payment below 3 percent.
The balance must come from private or other public lending institutions.
• In return for putting up the money, the State will share in the eventual
appreciation when the home is sold, re-financed, or the home 6vyer is
able to make full monthly payments. The program is focusing on tenants
who face evictions from condominium conversions, on mobi lehome owners
who own their own coach but rent their spaces; and on cooperative or
nonprofit corporations that want to develop or buy mo bil ehome parks.
8. Section 235 Homeownership Assistance
Section 235 provides mortgage insurance and interest subsidy to pur-
chasers of single-family residences. Eligible families must not
have an adjusted income that exceeds a certain percentage of the
local median income.
9. Section 237 Mo rtoaae Insurance for Poor Credit Risks
Section 237 is for low- and moderate-income households unable to secure
loans from private lending institutions. The program, administered
by HUD, insures lenders against loss on home mortgage loans to families
which are marginal credit risks and also provides budget, debt manage-
ment and related counseling services.
•
37
Affordable Housing (COnttnued)
Page Four
10. Section 213 Cooperative Housing
Provides mortgage insurance to nonprofit corporations primarily
for financing the construction or rehabilitation of cooperative
housing projects.
11. Section 207 Multifamily Rental Housing
Section 207 provides mortgage insurance for multifamily housing
and mobile home parks. The project must contain at least eight
dwelling units and be located in an area approved 6y HUD for rental
housing and in which market conditions show a need for such housing.
12. Section 221 (d) (3) and (4) Multifamily Rental Housing
Section 221(d) provides insurance on mortgages an the FHA ceiling
interest rate for the construction or rehabilitation of rental or
cooperative multifamily housing far low- and moderate-income or
displaced families. Units financed under these programs may qualify
for assistance under Section 8. Section 221 (d) (3) mortgages are
available to public agencies, nonprofit, limited-dividend or coop-
erative organizations; private builders or investors who sell com-
pleted projects to public or nonprofit cooperations. Section 221
(d) (4) loans are available to profit-motivated sponsors.
•
13. Section 221 (d) (2) Homeownership Assistance •
HUO provides mortgage insurance to increase home-ownership oppor-
tunities for low- and moderate-income families. Mortgage loans can
be used to finance the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of
low-cost, one-to-four-family housing.
14, Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan Fund
This fund provides deferred-payment loans to local governmental agencies
and nonprofit corporations that operate housing rehabilitation programs
for low- and moderate-income households. The loan program is administered
by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD). The
passage of A8 333, discussed above, appropriates an additional $10 million
to the pro grain and revises the original program 6y allowing funds to be
used for room additions ; loans to be made in areas in which a local
agency or nonprofit corporation is or will be using federal funds for
rehabilitation; HCD to make funds available to nonprofit corporations
which are undertaking rehabilitation programs; and HCD to make funds
available to housing authorities and redevelopment agencies as well as
cities and counties.
u
38
Affo rda 6le Housing (Continued)
Page Five
15. Housinq Authority
(Public Authority Revenue Bond Financing) The City could execute
a joint powers agreement with the County Housing Authority, and
specify a scope of housing activities and designation of financial
responsibilities such as sources of lease payments, and lessee-
lessor relationship. This mechanism would not require voter
approval; however, according to the legislation, it would require
documentation that the housing is a "public purpose".
16. Nonprofit Corporation Revenue Bond Financing
A non-profit corporation could 6e established for the purpose of
developing low- and moderate-income housing, run by a board of
directors with memhers generally selected by the governing body of
the local Jurisdiction, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in this
instance. The nonprofit corporation would be authorized to float
revenue bonds to finance the acquisition and construction of pu6l is
facilities, which would generally 6e leased to the City. The revenue
bonds issued are secured 6y an indenture pledging the lease payments
to pay interest and principal on the bonds. If the City is the
lessee of the facilities the payment would most likely become
• a general fund obligation. The housing to be constructed must fulfill
a valid public purpose, with the burden of proof on fhe City or in-
volved public agency. The legislation requires that the City or
public agency must have title to the land to be developed, and that
the site be developed according to plans and specifications prepared
by the City or the involved public agency. Revenue bonds are exempted.
l7. Surplus Land
The City could investigate and inventory unused, surplus land owned
by other governmental entities for possible residential building sites.
Such lands include surplus freeway right-of-way, utility holdings, etc.
18. Joint Development
The City could encourage new firms to provide capital to local builders
for constructing housing for ne~a employees.
19. Eluity Partnership
The City could encourage homebuyers and investors to Dool their resources
and enter into mortgage partnership plans in order to reduce the costs
of housing.
•
J/
Affordable Housing (Continued)
Page Six
20. State Community Redevelopment Law
\_ J
This legislation allows communities to utilize tax increment financing
planning, administrative, acquisition, and improvement activities.
The law permits the Redevelopment Agency to finance land acquisition
for public purposes, construction of public facilities such as roads,
parks, and sewers, and administrative, legal, planning, and erigf veering
costs related to the project. The Redevelopment Agency, established
by the Cf ty Council, would declare a project area and prepare a re-
development plan. Tax increment financing freezes the assessed value
of the taxable property in the project area as of the date of the
adoption of the redevelopment plan. Thereafter, tax agencies receive
only the amount they would have received if no redevelopment occurred.
The difference between that amount and the increased property taxes
due to physical improvements goes to the Redevelopment Agency. The
excess revenues thus produced are used to pay off bonds issued to
finance the expenses of the redevelopment process such as administration,
planning, acquisition, and construction of public facilities. The
effect of Proposition 13 has keen to somewhat reduce the attractiveness
of this measure because of the limit on the property tax that can 6e
assessed; however, this financing mechanism is still viable.
21. SB 99 Mortaa ne Revenue Bonds •
SB 99 mortgage revenue bonds were traditionally used in a redevelopment
area; hor.~ever, recent legisla tf on has now provided the opportunity
to use mortgage revenue bonds outside of redevelopment areas, The
mortgage revenue bonds are secured by a pledge of the revenues derived
from the repayment of the mortgage loan in certain insurance proceeds.
Each mortgage loan on property is insured. A portion of the bond
proceeds is used to pay the underwriter and other fees. Essentially,
loans are offered at an interest rate below the Drevai ling market
rate and are used prf ma rily for Housing for the affordable range, whf ch
has been recently tried by the San Berna rdfno County for use in the
County and in the incorporated areas. This mortgage bond will have
a life expectancy of one year for home purchases to be included with
an interest rate reduction of approximately two percent.
22. AB 1335
with the passage of AB 1335 in 1979, California cities are authorized
to issue tax exempt mortgage revenue bonds without having to use the
redevelopment process. AR 1335 authorizes cities and counties to issue
•
?~
Affordable Housing
.Page Seven
• residential mortgage revenue bonds for the purpose of purchasing,
constructing or improving a home. This includes:
a. The purchase of newly constructed home anywhere within the
Lity as long as the purchase is in connection with a city
program to increase the housing supply.
b. The purchase of a home which is newly constructed or is being
rehabilitated and which is located in an area in which the
City is conducting a housing rehabilitation or code enforcement
program, a neighborhood preservation area or concentrated
rehabilitation area, or an area for which federal funds are being
made available for the rehabilitation of existing housing.
•
1~
II FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS •
1. State Park Bonds
Funds from this source come to local jurisdictions from the State
distribution determined by population. Funds under this category
do not require a local match share contribution. Eligible acti-
vities include park acquisition or development, or a combination
of both.
2. Roberti-Z'Berg
Funds from this source come to local jurisdictions from the State
in two categories, "block grant" and "need basis competitive".
Funding is 75% by State and 25% local. Eligible activities include
pa rk acquisition or development or a combination of both. Also
under Roberti-Z'berg, a grant may be provided to cover on gofng
routine maintenance cost incurred by the local jurisdiction.
3. Land and Water Conservation Fund
A Federal program administered by the State granting a 50/50 acqui-
sition or development program. Conditions and restrictions on this
grant as used remove a degree of flexibility provided in State
grants. It is, however, a very fine program.
4. Urban Park Recovery Act, HCRS •
Designed to renovate and rehabilitate urban parks lost to maximum
service by deterioration. This 70/30 Federal Program is aimed at
inter-city metropolitan areas.
5. Environmental License Plate Fund
Grant though State dealing with air quality, preservation of natural
places, environmental education, etc.
6. Older American Act
Federal Program with many programs to aid and enhance the lives of
Older American within a community. Programs vary from employment, to
nutrition programs, to construction of Senior Citizen Centers.
1. California State Urban Fo restrv Grant
The California State Grant Program, which funds the local community to
establish a forestry program for an urban area. Typically, funding
would include re-landscaping of park strips or park areas, a limited
maintenance program, and a educational program for landscape maintenance.
1~
• Federal and State Grants (Continued)
Page Two
UUAG Program
A federally funded government grant program which is geared
towards providing assistance to economically depressed areas for
economic industrial development. The federal government will
act as a funding source for improvements in an industrial area
such as utilities and streets. Federal funding is established
to direct benefits to economically depressed groups; therefore,
an application for federal funding would require a development
plan to be established which identifies the direct gains in
terms of new jobs created by the completion of a federal project.
Solar Energy
A multitude of federal and state programs have been developed for
the use of solar energy or energy conservation at the local
level. These programs act in a multitude of ways, either as
direct grants or as loans to private parties or to government
entities. Programs are also ava itable for tax credf ts. A major
source of funding has been the National Energy Security Act.
This established a Salar Energy and Energy Conservation Bank,
• under the department of Housing and Urban Development to provide
subsidized loans to private and public property owners for
energy conservation Solar improvements. The loans are provided
at the low market rate and are paid back over a long term. Also
eligibility to private property owners is varied depending on
the person's incame. Other programs include California State
Alternative Energy source financing, to finance energy projects
at the local level and The California Energy Development authority,
which provides loans for residential, commercial and industrial
projects and grants for alternative energy projects.
~3
III ASSESSMENT OISTRI CTS/OTHER REVENUES
1. 1911/1913/1915 Acts
Assessment district proceedings offer a variety of methods of
financing storm dra in systems under the Acts of 1911, 1913, 1915
or other assessment proceedings. Assessment district financing
presents a viable alternative for local drainage areas, particu-
larly those which are substantially developed. However, since the
cost of administering assessment districts is higher than other
financing programs and is subject to protest from landowners within
the districts, it is recommended that a preliminary evaluation of
property owner acceptance be made prior to initiating proceedings.
The procedures of the 1911 Act and 1915 Act are generally similar
except for the means by which the assessment district bonds are
secured. Under the 1911 Act, bonds are secured by liens on specific
parcels within the district while the 1915 Act bonds are secured 6y
collective liens on the entire area of the district. Delinquencies
under the 1911 Act procedures result in individual foreclosures,
where the 1915 Act authorizes the City to levy a limited taz on all
property within the City to cover delinquencies.
2. Drainage fees
Under the provisions of Section 11543.5 of the Business and Profes-
sions Code (Subdivision Map Act) of the State of California, a •
local governmental agency may adopt a program for the collection of
drainage fees. The Subdivision Map Act enables agencies to enact
the drainage fee program after certain prerequisites have been
satisfied. The requirements for the drainage fee program include:
a. Adoption of a master drainage plan for each local drainage area.
b. Lertifica tion of the master drainage plan by the legislative
body of the Cf ty, County and/or Special District havf ng a
City-wide, County-wide and/or District-wide drainage plan.
c. Adoption of a fee structure based on the cost of the required
facilities for each drainage area and equitably pro po rtf oned
to all affected properties.
d. Establishment of a local drainage facilities fund.
Following adoption of appropriate local ordinance, drainage fees can
be collected from the developers as a condition of approval of ff nal
subdivision maps or other improvement projects. Funds are Lh en
deposited in the appropriate "local drainage facilities fund". They
may then be expended for engineering, administrative, and construction
costs of drainage facilities to 6e constructed within a particular
drainage area.
u
'tT
Assessment Districts (Continued)
Page Two
•
The City of Rancho Cucamonga presently has a "drainage fee"
ordinance. A developer or developers may construct the required
facilities and receive credit against their drainage fees. If
the cost of the master planned facilities which he constructs
exceeds the amount of fees due, it would then be possible for the
developer and the administering agency to enter into a reimbursement
agreement whereby the developer may be refunded the excess costs
when sufficient funds are available in the "local drainage facilities
construction fund".
3. Assembly Bill 549
Under Assembly Bilt 549 passed in 1979, flood control districts are
authorized to levy benefit assessments to help finance their operations.
A8 549 provides that the assessments be proportionate to the runoff
from each parcel of property and that the levy of such assessments
be approved by a vote of the people being assessed. The levying of
a benefit assessment for flood control services is authorized by
Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 60400), Division 2, Title 6,
California Government Code.
4. Federal Housing and Community Development Acts/Storm Drains
. The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCOA) provides for
Federal grant funds for community development programs. Storm drains
are among projects eligible for funding under this program.
Construction grant funds under HCDA could he used to implement por-
tions of a master plan of drainage, provided that the Agency can
demonstrate that construction of such facilities are part of a program
designed to meet community development needs and objectives and to
provide for a new or continued supply of housing for low and moderate
income families. Again, normally these types of funds are used for
master storm drain planning or construction and generally not applied
to flood protection.
5. General Obligation Bonds
In the past, General Obligation bonds proved to be one of the more
viable mechanisms to finance a variety of municipal projects. However,
since Proposition 13, General 061 igation Bonds have not been a primary
method of financing. Proposition requires 2/3 approval of qualified
electorate for passage. In addition, the Municipal Bond Market has
lost its AAA rating which has shrunk the available market.
n
LJ
?~
Assessment Bistricts (Continued)
Page Three .
6. General Fund
The General Fund 6y definition is used to support all programs
not covered by grants in aid, state subventions, or restricted
revenues. The General Fund contains tax revenue and therefore,
is subject to the effects of the deflation in A.B. B. In addition,
the current demand on the General Fund is greater than the resources
available, i.e. future requirements may extend the General Fund
beyond its ability to meet the dema nd for its use even with normal
growth. Generally speaking the General Fund should not be con-
sidered as a resource for funding of projects that are beyond
normal operating demands.
•
•
~~
• IV SUBVENTIONS/MISC. REVENUES--GRANTS
1. Gas Tax
The City receives a share of the seven cent gas tax received from
the State, pro portions to to population. These funds are restricted
to street and drainage improvement and maintenance of City streets
within the right-of-way limits. The City currently receives approx-
imately $500,000. The road maintenance budget exceeds this by
$100,000.
2. SB 325
These fund s, also referred to as the Transportation Development
Act funds, are the City's portion of the allocation from the sales
tax on gasoline. The funds are available for street improvement
and maintenance, when the County can make findings that all annual
transit needs have been fulfilled. In the current budget year, the
amount of these funds were approximately $515,000. The funds have
been used for the maintenance shortfall and for the construction of
ca pilot projects, i.e. street reconstruction, widening, bridge
widening, traffic signals. SB 325 funds are the primary source of
stable funds for the construction of major capital projects. The
City currently has a long range capital improvements program that
• exceeds $10,000,000. These funds are likely committed for the fore-
seeable future.
UMTA Funds
These arr. federal funds available for transit improvements. The
funds are genera 7ly applied for 6y the regional transportation
planning agency which is the San 8erna rdino Association of Govern-
ments (SANBAG). The funds can be used to acquire buses, establish
rail facilities such as bus terminals and maintenance equipment yards.
The primary beneficiary of the funds would be a transit operating
authority such as OMNITRANS. The City could and should be involved
in promoting effective transit facilities and planning within the
City but does not have direct authority to apply for these funds.
In general the bulk of these funds are being directed to major
metropolitan areas.
4. F.A.U. Funds
The Federal yov ernment for some years has funded the Federal Aid
program through the Federal Highways Act, This program includes
major funding for all Federal Highway programs. One of these in
~~
Subventions/Misc. Revenues--Grants
Page Two
recent years has been the Federal Aid Urban program. The purpose
of this program has been to provide funds to local agencies for
improvement of major arterial highways. It was the intent of the
program to be distributed on a regional basis within designated
urbanized areas and to be distributed by a cooperative effort.
liithin San Bernardino County these funds have been split on a
population basis between the east and west valley portions, Within
these sub-areas, the funds have been further distributed 55~ on
a population basis to the Cities with 45% reserved for distribution
by a west vat ley subcommittee to projects of regional significance
considered of most benefit to the region by the committee. Under
the current four-year program, Rancho Cucamonga received $220,000
for City projects which has been expended. The regional projects
selected for construction were the improvement of Vineyard Avenue
from Arrow Route to I-10 and 16th Street in Upland from Campus
to Cucamonga Creek. No more funds will be available for two years.
Funding levels are dependent on Congress.
County Flood Control
Historically the County Flood Control District has made available to
zones of the flood control funds for the construction of major
flood control facilities. With the exception of City funds generated
through bond issues or fees, these have been the primary source of
funds for construction of drafna ge and flood control facilities.
With the passage of Proposition 13, all available Flood Control funds
have been eliminated and are currently running budgetary deficits.
Unless something is changed in relation to Flood Control funding,
no funds can be expected from this source.
E.D.A.
These funds are made available to encourage industrial development
with high unemployment areas to create jobs. Basically the funds
are for street, storm drain and utiiity improvements directly
related to the development of industry. San Berna rdf no County
in recent years has received from $500,000 to $1,000,000 for
the funding of the number one priority project as determined by
the County Economir. Development Commission. Rancho Cucamonga
currently has the number one project. This project would construct
storm drain 50 in Che industrial area.
These funds are primarily targeted to the
cores. They are subject to much political
extremely unstable from year to year. The
could elimf note these funds completely.
Central City unemployment
manipulation and are
current administration
•
•
•
~~
Su bventions(Misc. Revenues--Grants
Page Three
• 7. California Industrial Development Financing Act
The above act known as AB7? and adapted January 1, 1981 authorizes the
issuance of tax exempt municipal bonds for private industry (industrial
revenue bonds). The act is the culmination of over five years of
efforts at providing California Cities and counties with statutory
authority for the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds.
Industrial development revenue bonds are tax-exempt municipal hoods
issued to finance industrial facilities for private enterprise.
Bonds issued under the Act are repaid solely by private enterprise,
with no taxes or other public monies obligated therefore. Interest
on industrial development revenue bonds issued under the act is not
subject to the California personal income tax.
Authorized Uses: 1. Industrial uses, including, without limitation,
assembling, fabricating, manufacturing or processing activities
with respect to any products of agrf culatu re, forestry, mining, ar
manufacture. Section 91503 (a) (1 ). 2. Energy development,
production, collection, conversion from one form of energy to another,
storage, or conservation activities, or transmission, transportation,
or conveyance as distinguished from distribution activities. Section
91503 (a) (2). 3. Principal amount limited to E1o,000,000.00
u
'i!
RC LAND COMPANY
380 WEST FOOTHILL BLVD,. SUITE C
RIALTO. CALIFORNIA 92376 .
X714) 874-3770
January 15, 1981
To: Members of Financial Task Force
From: Joe DiIorio
Re: Staff Report for 1-15-81 Meeting
I -Excellent Staff Report. Thank you. After reviewing
report with John Murphy of Stradling, Yucca, Carlson
and Rauth I have the following comments:
II - Re Affordable Housing
A. AL1 programs must fit the new Federal Tax
Laws. The restrictions of the laws probably
would not preclude the city from using the var- •
ious programs but would probably put a limit on
their use.
B, Many of the programs have a very ]invited
amount of money available and may not be worth
while going after. Included would be Section 312
loans; CHFA direct loans; CHFA "Ho-Hi" program;
Homeownership Assistance, and; deferred payment
rehabilitation loan fund.
C, Some of the program require "breaking too
much new ground" or are of such specialized
benefit that again, efforts may better be spent
eleswhere. Such programs would include a housing
authority, and; the use of surplus land, joint
development and equity partnerships. These may
he programs suitable to the city's needs in the
longer term.
•
5d
• January 15, 1981
Staff Report for 1-15-81 Meeting
Page 2
D. Non profit corporation financing has very
good possibilities. Sheldon Ganz of MKGK
Financial has participated in several successful
projects using Chis financing. The concept has
been used successfully many times for the financ-
ing of Civic Centers, Libraries and Courthouses,
and since Prop 13 is being tried extensively for
road and bridge improvements; sirport improvements;
fire stations; water, sewer and flood control. As
such the concept seems to have direct and major
applicability to Rancho Cucamonga.
E. Redevelopment Agencies, and the use of SB 99
and AB 1335 have been among the most successful
ways of implementing affordable housing. The use
of SB 99 requires that there imtst be a Redevelop-
ment Agency in existanco_.
• F. As additional thoughts:
1. The material Bob Young provided de-
scribing the study conducted in Santa
Barbara is valuable and should be used
as material for furCher work on afforda-
ble housing.
2. The Santa Barbara work, and current
law suits in Orange County reinforce the
the conclusion that the city, in order
to have a legally ~fordab le housing
element, must show meaningful efforts
at implementation of the element - ie,
we must legally move forward on provid-
ing affordable housing.
III -Re Federal and State Grants.
A. I didn't get 5lteldon Ganz's impuC on this. I
~~
January 15, 1981
Staff Report for 1-15-81 Meeting
Page 3
believe he has some of the best experience in
the Country for getting these grants, and
should be interviewed by staff.
B. One of the current thoughts on funding the
$35 - 50 million Day-Etiwanda creek flood con-
trol program is to apply for a water conserva-
tion conjunctive use grant. Our prospects seem
good with a great deal of cooperation between
[he cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario, the
Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside, and
the flood control districts of those two counties.
•
C. Federal and State Grants, probably in con-
juntion with local funding programs, will pro-
bably be necessary to our regional transportation
needs. Currently the first phase of improvements
needed around the On [ario Airport range in cost
from $30 to 80 million, and total transportation •
needs will be several times ChaC number.
IV - Re Assessment Districts/other Revenues.
A. According to John Murphy, Proposition 13 pre-
cludes the issuance of any new general obligation
bonds so forget them.
B. StaffS~ comments on not counting on the general
fund may be described as City Manager propaganda,
but Che comments are correct.
~C. From our current experience trying to use fees
and assessment districts to finance storm drainage
and streets, clearly there are major financial and
political problems involved. The same is obviously
true with the County's attempt to use AB 549 to
finance flood control.
•
~..~
• January 15, 1981
Staff Report 1-15-81 Meeting
Page 4
D. Given A, B and C above, the following is
pertinent:
1. As of January 1, 1981, California
Cities can legally issue Industrial Revenue
Bonds. These bonds work similarly to
Housing Revenue Bonds, and in states where
they've been used, have been most effective
in luring new industries, and should be
studied here. See attached article re Chino's
moves on this.
2. Non profit corporation and Redevelopment
Agency Financing are probably most critical
as financial tools for the city. They can
most effectively be used together and or in
conjunction with other programs noted - for
instance - both Mac Brown and John Murphy feel
• our current proposed industrial assessment
district would be most successful used in con-
junction with a Redevelopment Agency. Pract-
ically, there are certain community needs
that, since Prop 13 and the cut back of Fed-
eral funds, in my opinion, cannot be funded
through any other means. Philosph i.c ally, if
a greater share of the burden of providing in-
frastructure now falls upon the local gover-
nment, than that government should retain with-
in its jurisdictional much as possible of the
funds ge~~:erated here by development. If growth
is to pay for itself, the Local tools to allow
and enforce that must be in place, and [hose
tools rta~st in the opinion of several or our
experts include a Redevelopment Agency.
Fin anciall.y, I estimate the income possible to
the city through such an Agency at above $10
million a year. As a comperable, the City of
Industry Redevelopment Agency provides $30 million
a year to the city.
3. See attached memo from John Murphy further
describ iog some of these tools.
<I
,, i _. . ,. ., T
~
T ~ _ .
'
u
~
-
~ i r
h
-
~ ~
~
I
{
;
~
~
1 : :; t fl 1
: : ~ ,b 1 1
wrx ...... :......
n
u
:.
"
I
li
1 i
5<
III
of
w~
~ i
II II i ICI I ~ .
,:_.:,,r...w,.~.,... ,::,
i•
•
^~~
•
ro~~~e
' p~OI
d
S)~H3^dd ` 'e~
~bIf.4310d.
~'-,
~ ~ - !
J
l
i L
~ J r I
1 1 _
J /
`><~\
FINANCIAL TASK FORCE MIIIUTES
Janaury 15, 1981
Call to Order: The regular meeting of the Financial Task Force Committee
was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Baseline
Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Thursday, January 15, 1981. The
meeting was called to order at 7:02 p. m. by Councilman
James Frost.
Present: Ralph Lewis, Jeff Sceranka, Michael Price, Alan Greenberg,
Lloyd Michael, Joe DiIorio, Bob Lee, Councilman Jon Mikels
and Co-Chairman James Frost.
Absent: James Johnson, Robert Young, Jack Corrigan and Co-Chairman
Michael Palombo
Staff Present: Lauren Wasserman, Bill Holley, Harry Empey, Lloyd Hubbs,
Jim Robinson
•
Councilman Frost suggested that Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager, review
the proposed matrix of potential revenues and summary evaluations. Mr. Robinson
indicated that the matrix prepared by the staff was divided into four definable
groups. The groups included (1) Affordable Housing, (2) Federal and State
Grants, (8) Rssessment Districts/Other Revenues, and (4) Convections/Miscl.
Revenues and Grants. Mr. Robinson also indicated that the staff had provided •
the Financial Task Force members with a sunmary evaluation of each potential
revenue. The evaluatfon indicates not only the advantages and disadvantages
of each revenue source but also any significant requirements to receive the
funds.
Councilman Frost stated that with the completion of the City's General Plan
in I1ay, 1981, the City will be in a position to begin seriously considering
the solution to critical problems in our Community. Mr. Frost indicated
that at that time the City Council will begin the actual consideration of
the use of the financial options available in order to begin solving these
problems. Mr. Frost also suggested that each member of the Task Force
should work very closely with his legislative representatives at the federal
and state level in order to acquaint those persons with the problems which
are unique to Rancho Cucamonga. Joe DiIorio thanked the staff far its
work in preparing the materials for the Task Force. Mr. Diforio also com-
mented that his personas attorney had reviewed the information proof ded by
the City and a copy of his comments had been forwarded to each member of
the Task Force and to the City staff.
Mr. Di[o rio stated that in his view the two financial tools which appear to
be most viable to the City are the establishment of a redevelopment agency
and the use of non-profit corporations in joint powers authorities.
•
~b
Minutes - Financial Task Force
• Page 2
January 15, 1981
I1r. DiIorio noted that in his view, redevelopment would greatly assist the
City's housing program once the housing element has been adopted. He noted
that in the event a redevelopment agency is created, funds generated from
City growth and development, in the form of tax increments, may be used to
help finance many of the improvements which are needed in the City. In
the absence of a redvelopment agency, the benefits derived from increases
in assessed valuations wilileave Rancho Cucamonga and will benefit the
County and other agencies outside of our community. Mr. DiIorio noted
in his view that potential revenues to the City fran the creation of a
redevelopment agency could be between ten and twenty million dollars annually.
Mr. Alan Greenberg concurred with the points noted by Mr. DiIorio. In addi-
tion tAr. Greenberg suggested that as a supp lment to the matrix, Mr. DiIorio's
memo be incorporated into the final report of the Financial Task Force.
Mr. Greenberg stated that the various programs identified in the matrix are
always in a state of flux and are changed frequently. Therefore, it is
essential that someone, either a consultant or a member of City staff be
assigned the responsibility for monitoring all programs and for noting
changes which are implemented. Dh•. Greenberg also suggested that perhaps
the Financial Task Force may wish to stay intact in order Lo assist the
• City in working with its problems. The Task Force members have a valuable
expertise which could greatly assist the City if that is the wish of the
City Council.
Mr. Ralph Lewis stated that the City should assign an employee to monitor
and to actively pursue grants which may be available to Rancho Cucamonga.
Mr. Lewis also noted that among the list of programs included on the matrix,
the F.N.A. 207 program does not involve affordable housing.
Mr. Lloyd Michael questioned the wisdom of the City getting involved in acti-
vities which could better be handled by the private sector acting on its own.
Mr. Flichael stated that the City needs to 6e very selective in determining
those areas in which it wishes to become involved; that is particularly true
with respect to federal programs.
Mr. Ralph Lewis conmented that the City and its residents pay considerable
amounts of taxes and therefore some effort should 6e made to return those
revenues back to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, rather than to have them dis-
tributed to other cities and public agencies. In addition Mr. Lewis suggested
that the Task Force may 6e of help to the City in evaluating ~vhether certain
types of grants are worth pursuing.
Joe Ditor io indicated that the financial needs of Rancho Cucamonga are so
complex that no single developer is financially capable of resolving many
3~
Minutes - Financial Task Force
Page 3
January 15, 1981
J
of the more serious problems. However, the use of the redevelopment agency
results in the retention of funds in the City subject to the control of the
City Council acting as a redevelopment board. The City is still in a position
to maintain its independence while maximizing the use of a significant funding
option. Councilman Frost stated that in his view the primary issue is that
the City Council must establish priorities and levels of conmliLnent for the
City. A maximum effort should be made to recapture those funds which have
left the City but could be returned through the use of grant programs or
other financial tools identified in the matrix. Mr. Frost stated that the
primary concern of the City Council is whether there is substantial benefit,
either economical or social, to serve as an incentive for the City to become
involved in certain types of programs. The direct benefit to the City is,
in many instances ,an intangible benefit which simply cannot be accurately
evaluated. Mr. Frost stated that as the City reviews the various financial
tools available, one of the prfine considerations should be how the City
specifically will gain from involvement in the activity. Mr. frost also
noted that in the event the City Council authorizes the hiring of a grant
coordinator or similar position, there is no guarantee that the City will
receive any grants. Mr. Frost noted that the City Council must determine
the level of commitment to pursuing federal grants at the time the City
budget is reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Alan Greenberg commented that in order to obtain funding for the City,
it is essential that the City be willing to make a financial cortmmitment. •
In many instances the payoff to the Cf ty may not 6e received immediately.
Lloyd tlichael stated that if the City is planning to consider the establishment
of a redevelopment agency, it is important that this decision be made as
soon as possible and that implementation occur immediately.
Jeff Sceranka suggested that the fallowing motion may be appropriate as a
means for submitting a final recomnenda tion to the City Council. It was
moved by Mr. Sceranka that the City evaluate the feasibility of hiring perm-
anent staff to be assigned to monitoring and pursuing various types of grants.
In addition, the City should seriously consider the feasibility of establishing
a redevelopment agency. The use of non-profit corporations and various other
types of lease back agreements should also be evaluated to determine whether
those are appropriate for Rancho Cucamonga. The motion was seconded by
Mr. DiIorio, the vote was unanimous.
It was suggested by Councilman Frost that in addition to the committee's motion,
the committee remain available on-call to assist the City Council if the need
arises. Mr. Frost also reiterated a view expressed by most members of the
committee that the City Council be aware that for the benefit of the community
and to remain somewhat competitive in seeking industrial and commerical develop-
ment, it is essential for the community to work with representatives of the
private sector. This work should be primarily aimed at providing the basic
•
~~
Minutes - Financial Task Force
. Page 4
January 15, 1981
foundations which are essential for a young community. tor. Frost also
suggested that the staff increase its commitment to educating citizens
regarding the overall budget process. Mr. Wasserman indicated that the
staff is hoping to prepare some type of brief executive summary for
distribution to citizens of the community when the budget is prepared.
Councilman Frost thanked the committee on behalf of the City Council for
sharing its knowledge and most importantly its time to assist Rancho
Cucamonga in dealing with its very critical community problems. Mr. Frost
stated that the committee recommendation would be forwarded to the City
Council on February 4th. An invitation was extended for all members of
the Committee to attend that meeting if they wish.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
R pect y Submitted,
Lauren M. Wasserman
• City Manager
CJ
~~
ORDINANCE NO. 133
• AN ORDi NANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
208-OI1-02, 03, AND 04 FROM A-P TO R-3 LOCATED SOUTH OF
BASE LINE ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the.
following:
A. That the Planning Comvni ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property i5 hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and Lhe zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
A-P (Administrative and Professional) to R-3 (Multiple-family
residential).
Said property is located south of Base Line on the west side
of Hellman Avenue, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 208-011-02, 03 and 04.
SECTi ON 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
® ABS EN7:
~~ ''
ORDINANCE N0. 134
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEI. NUMBER
1077-041-58 FROM A-1 to R-1 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
TURNER AVENUE AT IRONWOOD STREET.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION l: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, reconenends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
• herein.
SECTION 2: The following desc ri6ed real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
A-1 (limited agricultural) to R-1 (single-family residential).
Said property is located on the west sf de of Turner Avenue at
Ironwood Street, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 1077-041-58.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Oa ily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, end ADOPTED this day of 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
~3
OAO INANCE No. 105-8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPf10NGA,
CALIFORNIA, PMENOING ORDINANCE N0. 105
The Lity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lalitornia,
tloes ordain as follows:
Section 1: Section 2(f) of Ordinance No. 105 is hereby
amended as folTowS:
"Amount of Park Fees Requiretl. Bhen the requirements of this
code are complied with pn the Dasis of proof ding park Fees, the minimm
amount of fees to De paid shalt be computes by using the full owing formula.
FORMULA:
XSP LSD minimum fee
,000
NNERE:
N = nunber of proposed dwelling units.
S = planned park acreage per 1,000 poDul atian.
D paputat5 on per dwelling unit on a scale and
density set by the responsi bte puDl is agency.
• L -average fair market value of parkland per acre as
determined by the public agency.
0 - average cost per acre to develop park as determined
Dy the public agency,"
Section 2: Section 2(hj of Ordinance No. 105 is herby
amended as fo~t lows:
"The City she 11 fix by RespTn ti on the average fair market
value of parkland per acre as represented by "L" in Me Formula contained
in Section 2(f). Further, the City shall fix by Resolution the average
cost per acre to develop parkland represented by "0" in Sectl on 2(f )".
Section 3: All other portions of Ordinance 105 should remain
in fuli farce antl effect.
Section 4: the Mayor shall sfgn this Ordin:.oce and the Ltty
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within fi/teen (15) days after its Dassage, at least once in
the Dail Re or f,_, a newspaper o/ general Circulation, published in the Lity
of n[a rto, California, and circulated in the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED and AOOPTEO this _ day of `_, 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Ph1i ~~p ~• Sch o~1 sser, Mayor--
ATTEST:
Ldu ren .. 'da'.5¢n^an, ty Ior4 ~ ~'
RESOLUTION N0. ,_BLy>_
A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO4GA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVERAGE
FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PARKLAND PER ACRE ANO AVERAGE
COST PER ACRE TO DEVELOP PAR KLANO IX MXCNO LUCAMONGA.
NHEREPS, the city council of the City pf Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has adopted Ordinance 105, relating to regulations for ded-
ications of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational
land in sued ivisi ons and planned conmunities; and,
YHEREAS, Section 2(/j of Ordinance 105 estabN Shes a formula
repui ri ng as components:
7. (The) average fair market value of parkland per acre as
determined by the public agency; arM
2. (The) average cost per acre to develop parkland as
determined by the Dubllc agency ;and
NHEREAS, Section 2(h) of Ordinance 105 di reds the average
fair market value of parkland per acre and the average cast per acre to
develop parkland be set by resolution;
NOT, THEREFORE. OE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
L ity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as fallars:
• 1. The average fair market value of parkland per acre in
Rancho Cucamonga is established at per acre, and it is
this figure of per acre that wiTi apply in the application
of Ordinance 105, and
2. The average cost per acre to develop parkland in 0.ancho
Cucamonga is hereby established at f-Per acre, and it is this figure
of $.~ per acre that •i11 apD 1Y in the application of Ordinance 105; and
3. That the City [ouncfl shall review and adjust, by resolution,
if warrantrd, the fair market value of parkland per acre and the cost per
acre to develop parkland in Ranc ha Cucamonga at the first regular City
Council meetings in January and July.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
hi clip 0. Sch osser, Mayor
ATT ESi:
lau ren M. Wasie rman, City Clerk
~5
C1TY OF RANCHO CUG>,.MOIVGA
STt1FF REPORT
DATE: February 4, 1981 ,jl roto
T0:
Members of the City Council and City Manager 1977
FROM: Barry K. Nogan, City Planner
BY: Michael D. Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-1A - ROBERTS GROUP -
change of zone from R-1-8500 single family residential to
R-3 (multiple family residential) for 7.3 acres, located on
the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue -
APN 202-17-010.
RELATED ITEM: TENTATIVE TRACT ND. 11625
ABSTRACT: The Roberts Group has submitted a complete residential development
package for the development of a 99 unit condominium project to be located on
7.3 acres of land on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue
(Exhibit A). In conjunction with the development of the property, a change of
zone to R-3 (a multiple family designation) is required. The change of zone
and the detailed development plans have been reviewed and approved by the
Planning Comniss ion. The Planning Cortmiss ion reviewed the zone change and
development plan at their meeting of December 10th, 1980, at which time the
Lommissi on recommended approval of the zone change to the City Council and
continued review of the development plan in order to resolve concerns voiced
by surrounding residents. Several residents expressed concern that the
development of the site will block views from their existing residences south
of 19th Street. In addition, the Planning Commission had concerns relative
to the scale of the buildings along 19th Street. As a result of these
concerns, the Planning Conmiss ion requested the applicant to work with the
Design Review Committee to mitigate the scale and visual impacts of the
project. The applicant did meet with the Design Review Committee and submitted
revised development plans to the Planning Commission for their consideration.
The Planning Commission, at their meeting of January 28, 1981, held another
public hearing to consider the development plan, and approved the development
plan with revisions made by the architect. Please find attached the
December 10, 1980 Planning Commission Staff Report on the zone change, the
December 10, 1980 Planning Commission Staff Report on the development plan,
and the January 28, 1981 Planning Commission Staff Report explaining changes
to the development plan and design. The resolution recommending approval
of the zone change by the Planning Commission is attached for your review
as well as the resolution of approval for the development plan with all
conditions.
~Y
February 4, 1981
Page 2
ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission, in continuing the review of the •
development plan, requested that the developer revise the development to
reduce the overall impact and scale of the development along 19th Street.
The Design Review Committee met with the developer and architect; and the
Committee suggested increased setbacks, and lowering the scale of buildings.
The architect provided revised plans which indicate a reduction in stories on
two of the buildings along 19th Street in addition to switching the style
of 6uil dings on the corner that would create less of an impact. The result
of this revision was two (2) less dwelling units in the project. In addition,
the site plan was altered to provide a larger setback along a portion of
19th Street and an existing oak tree was incorporated into the project design.
The Planning Commission approved the development plan contingent upon the
approval of the zone change by the City Council.
CORRESPONDENCE: During the December 10, 1980 Planning Commission public
hearings, several residences spoke about concerns relative to the project
site. Staff also received a letter from Laurel Hawker, stating opposition
to the zone change (Exhibit "B"). During the December 10, 1980 public
hearing, a petition was also sudnitted to the Commission signed by residents
south of 19th Street, objecting to the development of the subject site.
Staff at the direction of the Planning Commission, sent letters to all
individuals listed on the petition and those who spoke at the hearing to
notify them of the Planning Commission meeting of January 28, 1981 at which
time the Planning Commission would consider the final development plan and
of the City Council zone change hearing. At the public hearing of January 28,
1981, no residents or property owners spoke, and none appeared to be present. •
To date, we have received no further correspondence on this matter.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council
adopt the attached Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 80-14.
Respectfully u i ted,
f u~i ~~
BARRY K HOGAN
City P1 nner
\ _~
BKH:MDV:kp
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map
Exhibit "8" - Letter from Laurel Hawker
Ordinance for approval of Zone Change
December 10, 1980 Planning Commission Staff Report on Zone
Change
December 10, 1980 Planning Commission Staff Report on the
Development Plan
January 28, 1981 Staff Report on the Development Plan
C~
l97
~w M..~~ 'T'AM w ~A '~1 ~~=~i ~ '
~11~~iWi ^ V!Y4Y1'.]N -PIN
. 1
• !
~~ ~~ ~~
~4 O
~a~
,,W^^
~<3 i I ~¢~ L..~ Im: ~Q~ I G~
y
~.. ___ I _._ _ _
'3Atl b$ONg31
~j
yI ~
~ IWEI
N
r
Q
S(
4
;,
_
.
}r ~
~
~ ~~~
I ~;
~~
}y
-
_._._...._
c
- -
-
~:
_S '- --
F
-
m.
G- C
~tl
."w
.-ti
I .~ I \ 19Nt wc~
~'N 3J0Rf6Y1V~
e~
~.
.,a ~
z i ('__~ iitl~
g ~ ~ i ~_..
I
~: ~
I - -
~~~~_
;~ ~- .
F~
n3
e7
I
/_ sA
lL'
``
r~.=<1 ~aw~=
6655 c~{etmotn c/{v<nuc
d{lra r",na, eolifcxnin 97701
December 8, 198~r;,u;i;7Y"'rltr,'rll.'h^r~.~~
City Punning DSviaion ti;~ ~` ~' ` 0 73~'~
RanehoaCucamongaUnlt H 7~3~9:u?~IhU~liyi3~~'ss
California 91730 ~
R. C. Planning Commleel on
Dear 91re:
In regard to Zona Change No. 80-14
from R-1 to R-3 for the 7.3 acres located
on the northweet oorner of N1reteenth
and Hermosa Avenue.
This zone change would greatly augment
the difficultlee caused by density of care
and people, narrow streets, and s dangerous
flooding problem.
Yours truly,
-r
~~--~4A W
•
•
(~
No. 4264
ORDINANCE N0. )j (e
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PRRCEL NUMBER
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
• C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property i5 hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
p~r C<`dJ ,: CgrG, Pr ~i~`,~ ~"L1L! %r~.'f ~! .~lrY'aAdiU~~'d`re~r•(-
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen fly) days
after its passage at least once in the Oaiiy Repnrt, a newspaper cf
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADDPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
PIOES:
A85 ENT:
7d
l
CITY OF RniVCFIO CUCAmOrX ~A
STAFF REPORT
Date: December 70, 1980
Tc: Planning Commission
•
From: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
By: Michael Vai rin, Senior Planner
Related Item: Tentative Tract 71625
Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-14 - ROBERTS
GROUP - A change of zone from R-7-8500 single family resi-
dential) to R-3 (multiple family residential) for 7.3 acres
located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa -
APN 202-17-010
BACKGROUND: The applicants are requesting review and approval for a change
of zone for approximately 7.3 acres of land located on the northwest corner
of Hermosa and 19th Street (Exhibit "R"). The property is presently zoned
R-1-8500 which would permit, the development of single family residential
dwellings on a minimum 8500 square foot lot. The applicant has requested
a zone change to R-3 for the development of a condominium project comprised
of 101 dwelling units equaling 13,6 units per gross acre. The Interim
General Plan designates the property as a mixed use designation which would
permit high density residential uses (15-30 d.u./acre) and the proposed General
Plan indicates the subject property as medium density residential at 5-14
dwelling units per acre.
ANALYSIS: The subject site is adequate in size to accommodate the type of
development which is proposed by the developer and which is permitted in the
requested zone. The zone change request is consistent with the Interim and
Proposed General Plan Land Use Element. The surrounding zoning and land use
of adjacent properties is as follows:
Land Use Zoning
North Vacant R-1-8500
South Single Family Residential R-1
East Vacant A-P
West Existing church facility R-1-8500
The site is presently vacant and Conte ins a San Bernardino County Flood Control
Channel which traverses the northeastern portion of the property. Also included
on this Agenda is the detailed Staff Report of the specific site plan and
development proposal.
7~
Environmental AssessmA.. and Zone Change 80-14
Page 2
The applicant has prepared an expanded Initial Study on the overall project, •
which is included in your package for your review and consideration on the
environmental aspects of both the Zone Change and the development proposal.
Staff has reviewed the Initial Study and can find no significant adverse
impacts on the environment as a result of the Zone Change.
CORRESPONDENCE: This request has been advertised in The Daily Report news-
paper as a public hearing item and approximately 35 public hearing notices
were mailed to residences and property owners within 300' of the property.
To date, no correspondence has been received for this project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a
public hearing to consider all public comments. If, after such hearing,
the Commission concurs that the Zone Change is consistent with the General
Plan, then a Resolution recommending approval of Zone Change No. 80-14 is
provi ¢ed for your consideration and adoption.
ge;p ctful yyj~gdmitted,
BKH:MV:nm •
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - location Map
Resolution of Approval
•
~z
..~~.: ~
•
~~
~~
~~
39 _
~<
4
~~nCx ~ai
~QY Y
3m vmvm~
•
';
0
~~
¢ r
g~
~~ '~
-I -
I~ ~
-
0
~ ~~
~
¢- I I ¢~
~~
i
~~:~ .
Ga
N
w~
H~
$~~ ~~ a~
~a=.
~ J ivx.erc~~
390p®YNJ '2 i
Z
c_
¢ ~ NV31
~d
~,
a
c~ i i,
n'
~ ~ 4
~3
C
RESOLUTION N0. 80-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING •
COMMISSION RECOhT1ENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE
N0. 80-14 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM
R-1-8500 to R-3 FOR 7.3 ACRES LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND HERMOSA
AVENUE.
WHEREAS, on the 29th day of August, 1980, an application was
filed and accepted on the above described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of December, 1980, the Planning
Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section
65854 of the California Government Cade.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following findings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size,
and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding
area;
2. The proposed zone change would not have significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; •
and
3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the
General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significa^*. adverse impact on the
environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on December
10, 1980.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California
Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
10th day of Oecemher, 1980, Zone Change No. 30-14.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 80-14.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall
be forwarded to the City Council.
~T
lu ~ No. .... /b
Page 2
C~
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1980.
PLANNING COh1MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Richard a Chai man
e. ~
ATTE
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JRCK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th day of December, 1980 by the following vote
to-wit:
C•
~•
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceran ka, Rempel, Tolstoy, Dahl
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: King
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
~5
CITY OF RANCHO Cl,'CAA-TONGA
SIAPI' REPORT
DATE: January 28, 1981
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K, Nogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
,rte c~ cn'n~nc~
~; - ~
~,
_~ r
O1~ lL-4(S7>'
FBI A~
V lll~.`i Ct
1977
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS'4ENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 11625 - ROBERTS
GROUP - A total residential development for the development of
TOT condominiums on 7.3 acres of land comprised of 2 iots within
the R-1-8,500 zone (R-3 pending) located on the northwest corner
of 19th Street and Hermosa - APN 202-17-010
ABSTRACT: This project was continued for review by the Planning Commission
at its meeting of December 10, 1980. The detailed Staff P,e po rt which was
reviewed by the Planning Commission at that meeting is attached for your
review and further considers tia n. As the Commission will recall, concerns
were expressed among the Commission that the scale of buildings along 19th
Street may be too great for the type of character and atmosphere which is
being encouraged for the 19th 5t reet corridor. Therefore, the Planning
Commission continued review of the item to allow the Design Review Committee
to re-examine the scale of the buildings and bring back recommendations on
possible changes to the Planning Commission for their consideration. The
Design Review Committee met with the applicant and have made revisions to the
project, which are now before the Commission for final review and consider-
ation. If the Commission concurs with the changes recommended by the Design
Review Committee and with the findings and conditions provided in the at-
tached Resolution, then adoption of that Resolution would be appropriate.
ANALYSIS: Following you will find two exhibits showing views from 19th
Street, Hermosa Avenue, and the intersection of 19th and Hermosa. The
Design Review Committee requested that the architect do Lhe following items:
1. Reduce the scale of the two type "A" buildings along 19th Street
adjacent to the west property line.
2. Reverse building types "C" and "F" at the intersection and provide
as much setback as possible.
The two type "A" buildings located along 19th Street at the west property
line have been revised to eliminate the unit above the garages fact n9 79th
Street. This creates a one-story loo Y, which stair steps back into the
second story. In addition to this change, the architect altered the sf to
plan to provide a greater setback to the type "A" buildings and provide a
wider landscaped area between the buildings and 19th Street. The landscaped
area was fnc reased approximately 10-12 feet in width. This site plan ad-
justment also permitted the inclusion of he existing live Oak tree north of
the building A's to be incorporated into the landscape planter adjacent to
the type "B" building along the west property line.
TT 11625 -2- January 28, 1981
The architect, at the suggestion of the Committee, switched building types
"C" and "F" at the intersection of Hermosa and 19th Street and adjusted the
other buildings along Hermosa Avenue to provide more setbacks and variety of
angles along the street frontage. In the attached elevation drawings, the
architect has also shown how the alluvial rock walls can be utilized with
mounding to help provide additional screening and character to those street
frontages.
CORRESPONDENCE: As the Commission will recall, several property owners on
the south side of 19th Street spoke at the meeting with various concerns
regarding this developnen t. Staff has sent the pecple, wha signed the
speaking register, a letter indicating to them that the Planning Conmmission
would he considering thfs project at the January 28, 1981 meeting. To date,
we have received no further correspondence from these homeowners on this
project.
RECONME!IDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a
public hearing to receive all public comments. If, after said hearing, the
Commission concurs with the findings and conditions recommended by Staff,
then the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions
would be appropriate.
Resp ctfull submitted,
i /
ARR~ OGR
i~y Ala nne
OKH :f1V:cd
Attachment: 12-10-80 Planning Commission Staff Report
7
~l-
;4
;~
!;; •
o!
.~a---~
o
O D
W
~
a
00 _
0
n
n
~d
d
}~:
~8
~j
of
~~
0
_,
i~!
/~
r
rv
l~
N`
GI
\~
L;I
c
CITP OF RA(\Ch1O CCCANIC'tiGA
sr~r x~PORT
Date: December 10, 1980 ~~~
To: Planning Commission
From: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
By: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
Related Item: Zone Change No. 00-14
Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 11625 - ROB ERTS
GROUP - A total residential development for the development
of 101 condominiums on 7.3 acres of land comprised of 1 lot
within the R-1-8,500 zone (R-3 pending) located on the north-
west corner of 19th and Hermosa - APN 202-17-010
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a total
residential development consisting of a one lot subdivision on 7.3 acres
of land to be developed with 101 condominium units. The project site is
located on the northwest corner of 19th and Hermosa (Exhibit "A"). The
project site is presently zoned R-1-8500 and the request for a change of
zone to R-3 is being processed concurrently with the request for the develop-
ment of the property. The Zone Change request is fully described in the pre-
ceeding Staff Report. The project site is presently vacant and contains
several mature trees throughout the site in addition to a San Bernardino
County Flood Control channel tra nsversing the northeast corner of the site.
The Interim General Plan designates this area as mixed use and the proposed
General Plan designates the area for medium residential at 5 to 14 units
per acre.
The project has been reviewed by the Growth Ianagement and Design Review Com-
mittees in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance and has exceeded
the threshold point limit, therefore eligible for consideration of approval
by the Dlanning Commission.
ANALYSIS; The Te ^, :;.:'.ve Map is prepared in accordance with the State Subdi-
vision Map Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance. The development is being
proposed in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance development standards and is
in conformance with the Inte rfm and Proposed General Plans. The project is
being developed as ownership housing with attached enclosed garages, recrea-
tion facilities, common circulation areas, and common open space areas. The
project is providing all required minimum setbacks for both street frontages
and the side and rear property lines.
o~
Environmental Assessm~,., and Tentative Tract 11625
Page 2
• Access to the project will be provided by two driveways from 19th Street.
No access will be permitted from Hermosa Avenue. The interior circulation
system is simply comprised of two connecting vehicle circulation loops to
provide the most effi bent access to each of the units. Each unit is
being provided with an attached two-car garage; a minimum of twenty visitor
parking spaces are being provided throughout the site. The development of
this project will require the improvement of 19th Street and Hermosa. Her-
mosa will be designed and improved as a major water carrying street. In
addition, the San Bernardino County Flood Contrul Oist rict has requested
additional right-of-way for the existing Alta Loma Channel which transverses
the northeast corner of the site, plus the installation of a new rectangular
concrete channel for this portion of the channel.
The conceptual landscape plan indicates that ample landscaping will be pro-
vided throughout the site with concentration on the street frontages, around
indi of du al units, and the recreation area. The recreation facilities provided
within this project include a pool and tennis court, In addition a portion
of the open space area is being devoted to a water element which flows between
several units and dawn to the pool area. The project will be required to
meet the 50 tree per acre City standard. It is recommended that substantial
landscaping, mounding and meandering sidewalks be provided along street fron-
tages. Also, it is recommended that dense landscaping be provided along
19th Street in front of the two unf is which have garages facing 19th Street.
• The site does contain several mature trees; Eucalyptus, Peppers, Live Oaks,
and a Palm. [t is recommended that these trees be retained wherever possible.
It appears that the majority of the Eucalyptus trees fall within proposed
building pads. However, the Oak trees do not fall within building pads and
appear that they can be saved. Since these trees are as old as 90 years and
provide a mature natural resource, it is recommended that the Oak trees be
retained and that precise plans on the saving of these trees be submitted to
Staff prior to recordation of the map.
The Design Review Committee has reviewed the architectural design of the struc-
ture and has found them to be acceptable and has recommended approval of the
design. The structures are being composed of several different types of materials
such as stucco, exterior lap siding, exterior wood siding, wood railings, and
cedar shingles. Colored renderings of the design of the building will be
available for your revf ew at the Planning Commission meeting.
At the time the church to the west of the subject property was reviewed by
the Planning Commission, residents to the south felt that the project would
obstruct their views. It was determined that the church would not obstruct
their of ew. This project will also not obstruct their view.
The applicant has prepared an expanded Initial Study, which is enclosed in
your packet for your review. Staff has reviewed said Initial Study and has
found that if the conditions recommended are adopted with the project, that
any significant impact will be mitigated to an acceptable level. This includes
the saving of the trees, installation of street improvements, improvements to
drainage facilities and proper grading and site development.
~(
Environmental Ass ess~ .and Tentative Tract 11625 (.
Page 3
CORRESPONDENCE: The Tentative Tract Map was advertised as a public hearing •
in The Dai y Reoo rt newspaper. To date, no correspondence for or against the
project has been received.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Coimnission conduct a
public hearing to receive public input on this project. If, after such
hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval
recommended, then the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with
conditions would be appropriate.
Res ectfully submitted,
RR HO
Cit lanne
B KN:MV:nm
Attachments: Exhibit "R", Location Map
Exhibit "B", Tract Map
Exhibit "C", Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D", Phasing Plan
Exhibits "E"-"G" - Building Elevations
Exhibit "N" - Street Sections .
Resolution of Approval
•
d
" ~ooaaMOa ~ru
~~
=° ~ ' -~
~<~ ~~ ~¢-
il
~~
~ I!
~ ~~
F ~ it
~~ ~~ ~ ~-
~-
i
__
I
b~
&'
Q
__._. - ,Ntl tlNOWtltl
S
~~ K.~~
~~ `,~~.
3g ~ z Q
~i
~~ ~ ~
QQ ~
n
~ N
~ ~_
II ~a III ~J W
~ IsI,' ~~~ ~~ a~
'~I i
--~-~ '-
i
~~
s
~3F~ }~
1 S ' 370R18MNJ f
W
M1 .IV
L
~.
I ~, ~ 3tlINS~CiB
~ --
~ 1 J~
r
a
~~ v
¢~ ~
~~
~~ r ~
d
TF/tlt~lVE TRACT M ~ ~ "~
. ~ N~AOOWBROA`~ _ ':
~-
i~.~l _ „_..`-
..~ ice' -/ /~Y~ `~
~'~ of ~ ~ %~ ~~`~
~.
_ tt ~
r~ i~~ AID >~ _ i . "'~,~* .~r.r. ~_~
` I ` i `\,» a .~ ~ ~ .
a. J (I ~', ~'~ ~._;_~~ It <~ .~`µ _. ~,~..'_
...~ E Rev~~D,.~-,~.,,. ~h~Ni~ir „a„
•
1•
I
~ I
i
I ~
~~..
ill a °~ Nooaa~noi ~ i3w ~-=
brnavnn~.• Krrou ~f I g
•
r ~~
Z
a
ai
W '
a
Q
U
Z
a
J
s
m
4l,
~. '3Ab b5pWtl3H
S 9t
~~!~! $~.~Q' 1 .~}, 1 NOO!':1MOQV3W ~~"~"~~~i I~~
Y.~ gW(JfIJ pnIMI
.~
(/1 _N _N Uf
C ~C C ~C Z (~
7 7 7 7 ~V
W T-NO iA -
N N N M 3Atl tl50Wtl3H N ~
. , ------- - a
~NCOa y.~------ ~ _
dd~d ;. a s
~~~ o ~_
a aaa ~~rr~::~ ~~
1 ! N ~ o
_'
n a ~I
11~
/ i LL
~] ~ 1
P
// W ~
., a ~~ ~'~
~, ~ m ~
~`a-n.__h _j...~..~.
~~
..~.... ,.... o
~~~~
t7~ c = :~~ o ~..~ti1C~T~
~oo~°'~ oa 9=
n
w
•
i
~~
_-~.. ~.... o
~'6 t~C1 iL®H L([
~y O O~ O Q v
\ ~~ ~ f r~
W
~' ~ ~ 'ma
es
c
~U
ar
i~
•
•
~n amIJS~.b nU. ~ ~ Q e ~O Q
a
Q
L
~l
l~
N9
d
~]
0
~Q
LS
Col
0
~1
Q
Q
Q
' ~ s
W
..1 : '
W
;v
o ~
Q
a.
L~
M~
d
.. i ...~.
., ~
~ ~ ~.e~°'°'w,rin~i.~y
9' 'aV3R~ f N s
~ LY,t q~. i
, ~ y
.
2 ~
•
;
l \
C
4 ~
~_ ief
- a 'L
/
m~ -
i
_
i ~ ~ u`.
oY~.1~ -
L ", ` -i~ j~ I ~
r ..J j ~
RESOLUTION N0.
• A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 11625.
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11625, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Roberts Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development
located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermose Avenue,
consisting of 101 condominium dwelling units on 7.3 acres consisting of
two (2) lots, and;
IJHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEP,EAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
• Section 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11625 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all aDPlicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
an,y easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property withfn
the proposed subdivision.
~~
aesouunon io.
Page 2
(g) This project will not create adverse impacts on the •
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
Section 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 11625, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
Plann inq Division
I. In conjunction with the development of Phase I, all
street landscaping and mounding shall be completed.
2. The use of any garden walls along the street landscaping
shall incorporate alleuvial rock.
3. Interior landscape planters in front of garages shall be
planted with trees.
4. Curvilinear sidewalks shall be provided along 19th Street.
5. The project shall be designed to retain Live Oak tree
near the west property line and the live Oaks at the
northeast corner of the site. A detailed tree plan shall
be submitted which will indicate how such trees will be
retained. •
Enaineerina Division
6. The street improvement plans for 19th Street shall be
designed and constructed to meet any requirements of
Caltran s. The plans shall be approved by Caltrans prior
Lo recordation of the map.
7. Design and installation of improved channel facility for
Alta Loma Channel from the northerly tract boundary to
Hermosa Avenue shall be required per San Bernardino
County Flood Control District's Standards. All on-site
and off-site required right-of-way shall be dedicated in
fee to Flood Control District. The construction cost of
the channel shall be credited to the storm drain fee, and
a reimbursement agreement will be executed per section 8
of City Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which
exceed the amount of these fees.
II. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and
df spo sal of surface drainage entering the property from
adjacent areas on north and northwest.
9. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way
are to he quit Claimed or delineated, as per City Engineer's
requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. •
~(
Resolution No.
Page 3
• 10. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalk.
Under sidewalk drain shall be installed to City standards.
11. At the time of underground utility installation and prior
to installation of street improvements, the developer
shall contact the appropriate cable television company
for the area and make arrangements which would give the
company the opportunity to install cable at the time of
trenching. If the cable television company does not
install cable, then the developer shall install conduit
and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such details shall
be shown and verified on the improvement plans.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH OAY OF JANURRY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
• ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoiution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Conmi ssion of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981 by the following vote
to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS;
NOES: COMMISSIOPIE RS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
\J
~3
DEPARTMENT OF COMMl1Ni TY DEVELOPMENT
sTANDARO CONDITIONS
. •
subject: TE~ITaTIVE Tf~AGT ~(fo35
Applicant: ~~~TS VI'~l/t
Location: NWG OP $rN~NETE~IJTN ~ E{ETZM65A
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLRNNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE ItlITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
~1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
time of Building Permit issuance.
4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreat•
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
__ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall 6e installed and
located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division.
6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with
view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
_ 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill
Fire Districts as "hazardous", the roof materials must 6e approved by the
Fire Chief and Planning Division prf or to issuance of a building permit.
_ 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division
far review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally
integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties
and streets as required by the Plann in9 and Duil ding Divisions.
~10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to
the <_a tisfac Lion of the Director of Community Development.
•
~~
~11. A detailed lighting pion shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan
shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of
shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties.
~12. All swinaning pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be so7 ar heated.
_y,[ 13. Tex turized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
` 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit.
19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted
for a solar water heating unit.
20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be
incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, doubie
paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a
solar water heating unit.
_ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the
satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout
` the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan far Alta Lama.
A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes,
physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City
equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map.
24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance
of equestrian troll s.
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational uses.
~14. qll trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals
kept out of public view from private and Dubl is streets.
~15. Standard patio cover plans shall 6e submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first
unit.
~16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a
clear and concise manner, including proper illumination.
17. Soiid core exterior doors, Security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project.
95
25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and/or
rents, in conformance with ell Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall •
be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels
at the time of construction of the prpject. Proof of this provision
shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units.
B. ~ Parking and Vehicular Access
1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall.
~2. Parking lot trees shall 6e a minimum 15 gallon size.
_~ 3. All two-way aisle widths shall 6e a minimum of 24 feet wide.
4. Emergency access shall 6e provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
5. All parking spaces shall 6e dqu6le striped.
_~ 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers.
~7. Designated visitor pzrking areas shall be turf blocked.
~8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the
owner.
~9. No parking shall he permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed
by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Div jsion prior to
issuance of building permits.
C. Landscaping
_/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
_~ 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of
existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall 6e
completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the
proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted [o and approved
by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan.
•
•
~~
~3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be
trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
• shalt be approved far removal at the descretion of the Planning Division
during the review of the Master plan of Existing On-Site Trees. Those
trees which are approved for removal may he required to be replaced on a
tree-for-tree basis as provided by the Planning Division.
~. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in
accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
streets and 20' on exterior streets.
~. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
shall 6e provided within the development; 20%-24" box cr larger, 70%-15
gallon, and 10%-5 gallon.
~6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
~7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and
are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with
slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope
planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and
appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall
be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
• shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all
such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading
or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building
Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to
germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination.
8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of maintenance shall 6e submitted to the City prior to issuance
of building permits.
9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall
' be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
_ 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall
be subject to approval by the Planning Division.
_ 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall 6e planted
within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
size trees, and an ahu ndance of landscaping is required along
I nrnd FfG-inno8g
D. Si ns
~1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance
with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval •
by the Planning Division prior to installation or such signs.
2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
_ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this
approval and will require separate sign review and approval.
E. Additional Approvals Required
1. Director Review shall 6e accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
3. Approval of Ten ative Tract No.~~ is granted subject to the approval
of Zone Cha nge ~if`
4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at
which time the Planning Commiss icn may add or delete Conditions or revoke
the Conditional Use Permit. •
5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by
purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on
or adjacent to their property.
In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract
on I have read the C.C. 8 R.'s and
understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re-
ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian
traffic to gain access.
Signed
Purchaser
Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
occupancy,
~6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of
building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification
from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of
Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such
letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within
sixty (60) days prior to [he final map approval in the case of the subdivision
map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
•
( V
~7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance
of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
- affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the
Department of Conmunity Development. Such letter must have been issued by
the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable
6y the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi-
fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be
obtained and submitted to the City.
~8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map
is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project
unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
_ 9. This suhdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation
of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISIOPI FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development
• ~/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval
of this project.
~2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence
shall 6e submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply
for fire protection is available.
~3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for anew residential dwelling
unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Ora inage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
_ 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial
development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate, Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: Systems Cev elopment Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees.
5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued
for this project within one year from the date of project approval.
~6. Street names and addresses shalt be provided by the building official.
~~
7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non-combustible roof material.
8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the •
street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding
or plan-ons where appropriate.
G. Existing Structures
_ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances
considering use, area and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
_ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped
to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
H. Grading
~1. Grading of the subject property shall 6e in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices.
The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the
approved conceptual grading plan.
~2. A soils report shall 6e prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the
State of California to perform such work.
_ 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist
and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the
planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior
to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of buf ldi ng permit
whichever comes first.
APPLICANT SHALL COr1TACT THE ENGI^IE ERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLO'rII NG
cormtr[orls:
I. Oedica [ions and Vehicular Access
1. Dedications shalt be made by final map of all interior street rights-of-way
_ and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
2, Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights-of-way on the
following streets:
ddi tional feet on
ddi tional fee[ on
,y
AK• `Yr ie~! gyp.
~~ d
~3. Lorner property line radius will be required per City standards.
• _~ 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as
fot tows: Nprmx..a AYP. ra_ rrfiT auc -In su
~5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring qcc ss to all parcels over
private roads, drives, or parking areasvgp~ S/~q{/ Of YCCbIt/¢d C(I%/// flalp~yyP,
6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engre ss and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
J
Street Improvements
_ I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street
lights on all interior streets.
2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to:
•
STREET NAME CURB &
GUTTER A.C.
PVMT. SIDE-
WALK DRIVE
APPR. STREET
LIGHTS A.C.
OVERLAY WHEEL
CHAIR RAMPS
OTHER I
~l 7~l S / / / / / /
/ 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, an encroachment
permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required,
4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared 6y a
Registered Civil Engineer shall 6e required, for all sirept iptprovertlpnts,
prf or to isqsuance of an enc,rroas ent permi t. FilM/P/IeS OWN QYat~JS/u!/ 61~a/~/0.'
locaftm of ant ~.~rs!»ig ulil~(j f+~cil~ lfa! Wauy Offcaf GYrrlSyluc%icy.
5. Surety shal be p sled ahhd an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever romes first.
6. All street improvements shall 6e installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, prior to occupancy.
7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per the requirements of the City Engineer.
~~
K. Drainage and Flood Control
/ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all on site drainage •
facilities required by the City Eng ipeer.
_ 2. Intersection drains will 6e required at the following locations:
,~~3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding
under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions
of the program and City Ordinance No. 24.
_ 4. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall will be required to protect
the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street.
ffevx~o,~q Ae'irge
__y/ 5. T~~ '-"^ •- ~~ - -~- shall be designed as major water carrying
streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type
drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and/or
landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line.
L. Utilities
~/ 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV.
/ 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving •
utility companies and the City Engineer.
3. Developer shall 6e responsible for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required.
/ 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in
accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards.
/ 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet
requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire
District and the EnvSronmental Health Department of the County of San
Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will 6e required prior to
recordation.
_~"6. Approvals have not ueen secured from all utilities...-,nd other interested
agencies involved. Apyi Jdai of the final map will be subj ett to any
requirements that may be received from them.
M. General Requirements and APPrO Va is
~/ 1. Permits from other agencies will 6o required as follows:
/A. Caltrans for: l9~{1{ $f. .
B. County Dust Abatement required prier [o issuance of a grading permi
~C. San 6ernardino County Flood Control District
D. Other:
/ "oC
2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of
• the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the City.
3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
J/ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
•
ID3
CITY OF RANG] IO ClJ(:411d01VGA
STAFF REPORT
Janaury 14, 1981
•
T0: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, ity Manager
SUBJECT: Recommended Adoption Solid Waste Management Master Plan Revision
As the City Council is aware, the City has previously adopted the County
of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Master Plan. The original
document, although adopted in October of 1975, was approved by the City
Council in August of 1979.
The primary revisions of the Solid Waste Management Master Plan have
been made to the objectives with the creation of seven programs involving:
Waste Storage Collection and Transportation Programs; Waste Oispo sal
Improvement Programs; Resource Energy Recovery and Conservation Program;
Hazardous Waste Management Program; Education and Information Program;
Litter and Indiscriminate Dumping Program; and Waste Management Admini-
strative and Enforcement Program.
In addition the report notes that the sanitary landfill sites fn Yacaipa,
Cajon, Fontana and Colton are anticipated to close by 1980, 1982, and 1984
respectively.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolu-
tion 81-6 concurring with the goals and objectives of the
Solid Waste Management Master Plan Update.
LMW/vz
Enclosure
1 a't
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
82F EM Tgird Street • San Bemardiro, CA 92415 ~ (714) 3932900
B ESCOBAR, Acting Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: City F1anager
Gentlemen:
County of San Bernardino
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
e0Ag0 Of SVERVIaONe
~.,., ~. m,vhae. cn.,m.n...._ F;m o~R.ar
GI McElmin . ... ... SKw+d 041rmf
Omnn HM,yrpr ... ... rMrd omrsr
gotrn0 Tomvnd„ ..... Fourth Omkr
BoE H,mmack ..... .. _ . ... F,rl/i 0i,bkr
December 11, 1980 NOMINISTRPTIVE OFFICER
E.d Goodwin
File: F-5 FGENCV AIXAIRN ^6ffl~gTOR
Re: Solid Waste Management
Master Plan Update
Transmitted is the final draft of the County of San Bernardino Solid Waste
Management Master Plan. The revision of Lhe original Master Plan that was
• approved in 1975 was performed through input received from all cities, other
governmental agencies and interested parties throughout the County during
the past three months.
A copy of the original draft was sent to your City on September 3, 1980
far your review and subsequent input at the public meeting of the Solid
Waste Advisory Council on October 3, 1980.
The final draft is now ready for your approval so that it can be suhmitted
to the Board of Supervisors for their approval prior to forwarding to the
State Solid Waste Management Board for final approval pursuant to State
Government Code 66780 et seq.
Attached is a draft of a resolution that can be used by your Council in
approving the Master Plan. If the Resolution is not found appropriate, it is
imperative that the Council approve the Plan in concurring with the four
objectives as cited in the Resolution.
In order for this office to meet the deadlines set, it is requested that
your Resolution be returned to this office by January 16, 1981.
-~5
Solid Waste Management Master Plan Update
December 11, 1980
Pa;z Two •
If additional information is needed, or if our appearance would be of help
at your Council meeting, please advise.
Ver ly urs,
r~ ~~~~
B. C. ESC08AR, Acting Director
Solid Waste Management
BLE:rn
Enclosure
•
•
'QW
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Solid Waste Management Master Plan
• EXECUTIVE SVMMARY
INTRODUCTION:
The disposal of wastes, as it affects the environment and public health
is now a critical nationwide issue. The Master Plan Update attempts to
establish a general direction for the croncerted efforts of all cities,
the county and private industry to provide an efficient, cost effective
waste management system for the entire County.
BACKGROUND:
The original Master Plan was approved by the majority of cities in the
County and adopted on October 6, 1975 by the Comty of San Dernardino
to response to the Nejedly-Z'berg-Dills Solid Waste and Resource Recovery
Act. The Master Plan Update is mandated by State Government Code 66780 ei. seg.
The Plan included waste generation, collection and disposal, emphasizing
resource/energy recovery and conservation. Zt is essentially a compre-
hensive guide for all solid waste management activities in the County.
• OB,IECTNES REVISION:
The objectives of the Master Plan are considerably revised With the
creation of seven programs, namely: Waste Storage, Collection and
Transportation Program; Waste Disposal Improvement Program; Resource/
Energy Recovery and Conservation Program; Hazardous Waste Management
Program; Education and Informetien Program; Litter and Indiscriminate
Dumping Program; and Waste Management Administrative and Enforcement Program.
SANZ TARY LANDFILL INVENTORY REVISION:
The inventory of County sanitary landfills have been revised. The
Yucaipa, Cajon, Fontana and Colton disposal sites are anticipated to close
by 2980, 1980, 1981 and 1989 respectt vel y. The San Timoteo Landfill
will be the only designs tad East Valley waste disposal site by 1985.
Although most desert landfills hour. goad life expectancy, due to Fiscal
constraints and RCRA regulations Che County must rnnsider consolidating
landfills and establishing mini-transfer stations. Heaps Peak landfill
will be replaced by a transfer station with final disposal at San Timoteo
in 1981.
RESOURCE/ENERGY RECOVERY REVISION:
Thu Phase IT Colton Study (refuse derived fuel) and the Kaiser Engineers
Study (waste-to-energy) are discussed. A grant from the Department of
Energy [o continue these studies for waste-to-energy facility canstructlon
implementation was accepted by the County amounting to $630,000.
s i J0 7
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY REVISION:
The economic feasibility aspect was not substantially changed. However,
a five year rnst projection for Plan implementation shows considerable .
increase due to inflation and additio;ul activities needed to conform to
more restrictive regulations. Projected revenues rely progressively on
income from permit fees, land use and landfill gate fees. Additional
funding will be required to meet increased Environmental protection Agency
environmental restrictions.
ENFORCEMENT REVISION:
Standardization of the storage, handling and transport of waste is identified
in the Plan as a joint effort by both County and City governments, through
enactment of a uniform ordinance for all areas of the County.
The State Solid Waste Marmgement Board designated the County Environmental
Health Services Department as its official agent to enforce state regulations
pertaining to transport, storage and disposal of all wastes in the County. A
uniform procedure for enforcement is planned to be formulated Dy the County
with concurrence from Ne cities and private haulers,
PLAN ADMINISTRATION REVISION:
The plan administration aspect was not materially changed, ezcept for the
proposed formation of a County Task Force to handle hazardous waste spill
response. This Task Porce will coordinate with various rnunty, city, state •
and federal agencies to provide emergency response and danger mitigation
measures in case of hazardous waste spill within the County.
CITY APPROVAL:
In accordance with Government Code, Sections 66780 and 66783, the majority of
cities containing the majority of population Sn the incrorporated area of the
County must approve the Master Plan to render it a valid document. These cities,
by resolution of their respective City Council, must also concur on the following:
a. The objectives set forth in the plan;
b. The methods and organization for implementation of the programs contained
in the plan;
c. The procedures for Financing the recommended solid waste management program;
d. The role identified in the Plan for the City in tmplementtng this coopeza Live
effort for management of solid waste in an economical and environmentally
acceptable canner.
•
iii
1~0
RESOLUTION NO. 81-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE REVISED SAN BERNARDINO
COllNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN.
WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted the Solid Waste
Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972 (Sections 66700-66793,
Government Code); and
WHEREAS, said Act requires each County to prepare a Solid
Waste Management Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 66780.5 of said Government Code requires that
the Master Plan be revised at least every three years from the date of
initial approval; and
WHEREAS, the original Solid Waste Management Master was approved
by a majority of the cities containing a majority of [he population of
[he incorporated areas in 1975; and
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has
authorized revision of the said plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 66180 of said Government Code requires the
revised Solid Was Ce Management Master Plan for San Bernardino County he
approved by a majority of the cities containing a majority of the population
of the incorporated area; and
• WHEREAS, said Master plan has been reviewed by the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby approve said Master Plan and concurs
in the objectives sec forth in the Mastr_r Plan; the methods and organization
for implementation of [he programs; procedures for financing recommended
programs; and the role identified in the plan for [he City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED the day of 1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
1~ I
CITY OF RANQ q CCICAMOrK,A
STAFF REPORT
January 30, 1981
T0: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Nass erma n, City Manager
SUBJECT: Designate Members to Serve as Representative and
Alternate to the Citrus Belt Division. of the League
of California Cities.
The Citrus Belt Division of the League of California Ci tf es has
requested that our Community officially designate a representative
and alternate to serve as the CT ty's representative. It should
also be noted, however, that all Council members are considered
members of the Citrus Belt Division and are invited to participate
in the organization's activities.
Since Councilmember Frost has been actfve in the Citrus Belt
Division and will be assuming the office of Vice President later
this year, it is recommended that he be designated as the City's
principal delegate to the division. The Council should consider
naming an alternate in the event Councilman Frost is unable to
represent the City as a voting delegate.
LMN/vz
1-D
~ ~~~-
•
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of "X"
2222 Main Street
"X", California
This is to request that your City take action to designate members of the
Council to serve as Representative and Alternate Representative to the
Citrus Belt Division of the League of California Cities.
There have been occasions during the past year when it taas desired to con-
tact Cities in the Citrus Belt Division far a non-scheduled meeting or to
receive input on matters affecting the Division. In these instances, it
orould have expedited the matter greatly to have been able to communicate
directly with a single representative in the City, familiar with the func-
tions of the Divisf on and able to speak for the City Council.
The Inland Empire covers a vast amount of territory, and the problem of
communication and coordinating the League-related needs of all the Cities
involved is probably greater than that of any of the League's 13 Divisions.
In order to deal with this problem, it is necessary that the communicate
more effectively and develop a stronger network for participation.
• Therefore, it is requested that the City Council take official action,
either by Resolution or Minute Action, to designate individuals to serve
in the following capacities for the period October 1, 1980 -- September 30,
1902.
Representative to the Cf trus Belt Division,
League of California Cities
Alternate Representative to the Citrus Belt Division,
League of California Cities
It is further requested that the attached information sheet 6e completed for
each individual so-designated and returned to the undersigned as soon as
possible.
Very truly yours,
ED}LARD S. 4!HE ELE R, dr., President
Citrus Gelt Division, League of California Cities
City Ball -- 300 Horth "0" Street
San 6e rnardino, California 92413
4 Attachment
G7'Y OF RANCHO Cl1CAN10NGA
STAFF REPORT
January 30, 1981
T0: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Nasserman, City Manager
SUBJECT: Ambulance Deregulation
As the City Council is aware, there has been some discussion in the
Nest End of San Bernardino County relative to deregulating the
Ambulance Industry. At the present time, ambulance services are
governed by either a County Ordf nance for unincorporated areas or
for Cities such as Rancho Cucamonga which has adopted the County
Ordinances or the services are controlled directly by each City.
In addition to establishing guf delines for minimum levels of service,
the Cities have becomed involved in the regulation of fees and charges
for ambulance services.
At this point, the staff would like direction from the City Council
concerning how you wish to handle ambulance services in Rancho
Cucamonga. In our view, the City has three alternatives avatla ble
for handling the service. They are as follows:
1. Adopt an Ordinance which totally deregulates ambulance services.
The effect of this measure will be to let free enterprise take its
natural course. If the City were to deregulate ambulance services,
in the event there are problems With services in the future, the
City Council could adopt a specific ordinance regut ati rig the
industry.
2, gdopt a Comprehensive Ordinance esta bl ishf ng general guidelines
for ambulance services, including minimum standards and rates to
6e charged for services rendered. The effect of this alternative
is to place ambulances under the direct control and supervisf on
of the City. All other communities in the West End utilize this
approach.
3. Make no changes thus leaving the County ambulance ordinance in effect
throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is our view that this
Continued......
ilk
Ambulance Deregulation
January 30, 1981 •
Page Two
alternative is not particularly desirable to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. If we are going to have any involvement
in regulation of ambulance services, an ordinance should be
prepared which relates specifically to the needs of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
In summary, the Council has essentially two options. One is to totally
deregulate the ambulance industry, thus letting the private enterprise
take its own natural course. In the event that does not work, the
Council still has the alternative of regulating at some point in the
future. The second alternative is to adapt a specific ordinance
establishing guidelines and fees for services. It is probe 6le that
the fees will need to be adjusted on an annual 6a sis based upon
increased costs for providing the service. Please let us know how
you feel concerning the alternatives.
J
LMN/vz
•
113
n
u
MEMORANDUM
T0: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
FROM: Rohert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: January 21, 7981
RE: Ambulance De-regulation
Per your request we have prepared a proposed Ordinance which,
if enacted by the City Council, will entirely de-regulate the
ambulance business within the City.
I am also enclosing a copy of the County Code Sections which
• would be repealed if the proposed Ordinance is adopted.
[f the City Council wishes to do something other than a total
de-regulation, please advise me as to the nature and extent of
city control desired so that I can prepare somethf ng appropriate.
RED/jfw
Encls.
I-1
~J
~)
,- _
ORDINANCE NO. '
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REPEALING CHAPTER 8 of DIVISION 1 of TITLE 3
OF THE SAN BERNARDI NO COUNTY CODE IN ORDER TO
DE-REGULATE AMBULANCEf _r, C°, 7-~
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: Chapter 8 of Division 1 of Title 3 of the San
Bernardino County Code entitled "Ambulances" heretofore adopted by
reference by Ordinance No. 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is
hereby repealed.
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at
least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation,
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this __ day of •
1981.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
Rancho Cucamonga
ATTEST:
City Clerk
•
~~
_,
_ .. .. /'
•
Rh!(
\J
MOSQUITO, FLY, AND OTNER INSECT ABATEMENT 31.0713 - 31.0714
31.0713 Asseament Entered on Tax RoB: Co0ection;
Delirpuency: Laws Applicabk.
The County Auditor shall enter each assessment on the County tax roll
opposite the parcel of land. The amount of the assessment shall be collected
at the time and in [Ite manner of ordinary County taxes. If delinquent, the
amount is subject to the same penalties and procedure of foreclosure and
sale provided for ordinary County taxes.
Laws relating to levy, collection, and enforcement of County taxes
apply to such special assessment taxes.
31.0714 Exemption from Lien Provisions.
The lien provisions of this chapter do not apply [o the property of any
county, city, district or other public corporation.
Chapter 8
AMBULANCES
Sections:
31.081 Definitions.
31.08? Permits.
31.083 Permit Fees.
31.084 Specification of Permit Areas.
31.085 Application for a Permit or
Renewal o(a Permit.
31.086 Investigation by Health Officer.
31.087 Issuance or Denial o(Permit.
31.088 Renewal of Permits.
31.089 Revocation of Permits.
31 A810 Suspension. Conditional Operation
anJ Temporary Variance.
31.0811 Appeal to the Board of Supervisors.
31.081' Emergency Service Availability.
31.0813 Communications.
31.0814 Standards for Dispatch.
31.0815 Ambulance Safety and
Emergency Equipment.
leas
~~~
hanvae/
31.081 HEALTH,BANRATION AND ANIMAL RECUlATI0N5
31.0816 Ambulance Personnel.
31,0817 Ambulance Rates.
-
- -- -- - 31.0818 Emergency and Disaster Operations.
-" -'"" ~ ~ 31.0819 User Complaints.
31.0820 Enforcement.
31.081 Definitions.
Unless otherwise specified, for the purposes of this chapter. words and
terms are defined as follows:
(a) AMBULANCE. The term "Ambulance" means a vehicle specially
- constructed, modified, equipped, or arranged and operated for the purpose
of transporting sick, injured. infirm, or convalescent, or otherwise
~. incapacitated persons.
fb) AMBULANCE SERVICE. The term "Ambulance Service" means
any private or public organization, individual, or agency which operates orte
or more ambulances.
(c) AMBULANCE SERVICE OPERATOR. The term "Ambulance •
Service Opera [or" means any person who operates an ambulance service.
(d) AMBULANCE ATTENDANT. The term "Ambulance Attendant"
.~ ~ means a qualified person acting as an attendant on an ambulance fesponding
to an emergency call and who occupies [he patient compartment while
transporting any individual in apparent need of medical attention.
(e) BOARD. The "Board" means the Board of Supervisors, County of
NMS+61kI~RkfAgy San Bernardino.
(f) COUNTY. The word "County" means the County of San
Bernardino, State of California.
(gl DEPARTMENT. The word "Deportment" means the Public
Health Ikpartmrnt o(the County of San Bernardino.
(hl DRIVER. The wort "Driver" means a qualified person who
operates an ambulance while responding to an emergency call.
(i) EMGRG ENCY CALL. An "Emergency Call" is a request for the
disputnlt of an ambulance to transport or provide other assistance for a
person apparently having a sndJrn unloresren need of medical attention.
Ij) EMERGP.NCY SERVICE. "Emergency Service" means the service
perfnrmcJ in response to an emergency call.
(kl PATIIiNT. 'fhe word "Patient" shall mean a wounded, injured,
sick, invali J, or otherwise incapacilalcd person.
fll PERSON. The Rrm "Person" as used in this chapter means any
individual, lino, corporalicn. association, or group or combination acting as
x unit
(ml MOBILE INTENSIVf•. CARE 1MIC) AMBULANCE. The term
"MIC Mnhulanre" is an amhulancr whidt has' adJilional equipment and •
supplies as identilirJ in this chapter unJer Ambulance Safety and
Emergency Equipment. Section 31.0815.
f*n'-k`.'z~~!:1~#fa'SSri?Li lr~nrn6l 16P6 .
l~~
~ .
AMBULANCES 31.082 - 31.080
C
.. (N MIC PARAMEDIC. The term "MIC Paramedic" means a person
~~ specially trained in the provision ofemergency cardiac and noncardiac care
-..-~~- appropriately certified by the County Health Officer.
(o) MIC NURSE. The term "MIC Nurse" means a nurse who has been
certified by the County Health Officer as yuaGfied in the provision of
emergency cardiac and noncardiac care and the iswance of emergency
instructions to MIC paramedics.
Ipl PERMITTEE. Thr term "Pennittee" means any Ambulance
Service which has been regularly granted a permit by the Board of
Supervisors to engage in a business in which ambulances are operated within
a specific permit area in the unincorporated area Of the County of San
Bernardino.
31.092 Permits.
lal REQUIRED. It shall be unlawful for any person. either as owner,
agent or otherwise. to operate. conduct. advertise, or otherwise engage in or
profess to be engaged in, the business or service of the transportation of
• patients upon the streets, or any public way or place in the unincorporated
territory o(the County of San Bemardino, without possessing a permit to do
so Irom the Department.
Ibl EXCEPTIONS. The licensing and permit provisions of this chapter
` shall not apply to:
l l l Publically owned ambulances:
(J Vehicles operated as ambulances a[ the request of local
authorities during any "state of war emergency;' duly proclaimed "state of
:aresEa.vrT;cr~+~.,r,-~ emergency:' or "local emergency;' as defined in the Government Code; or
13) Ambulances based in the States of Nevada or Arizona
operating in border areas of the County under the terms of a letter of
agreement between the Department and appropriate regulatory agencies
within the adjacent stales.
31.093 Permit Fees.
Permit fees shall br those specified in This County Code, Section
16.071?AI x)151, All permits shall be issued to expire on June 30 0l each
year, and the annual Poc therefor may be prorated on a quarterly basis for
the first year. Permit fees may be wan'rd by the Board of Supervisors i(
puhlic nerd and necessity require it for nonprofit agencies supported by
public aihR•rip UOn.
31.094 Specificnlion of Permit Areas.
All amhul:nwr cervicr pemtits and renewals thereof shall specify the
territory within which the prrmntee may provide ambulance service, anJ no
amhulann operator shall, but for the eruptions below, proviJe ambulance
srrviu for ambulance calls originalinR within the County of San Bemardino
outside the ICRIIUnaI IIn1115 fixed in the permit issued to him. The territory
so specif icd m any suds permit may hr inoJi Ord by the Drparhnent after
16x7 r/ rnarnsl
--- ~~D
31.085 HEALTH, SANITATION AND ANIMAL REGULATIONS
public hearing if such modification is (cued to be necessary for [he efficient
:~~t`~_: conduct of the ambulance service and (or the welfare and safely of the
msidents in the [erdtory involved.
' ~~ (a) EXCEPTIONS. A permittee may provide service for ambulance
calls on gina[ing outside the territorial limits fixed in the permit issued to
him:
~~ -~ •~ ~-~ ~ ~ 11) Upon request by any law enforcement or governmental
agency having jurisdiction.
(''_1 Upon request of any person for emergency ambulance service
when an ambulance is not immediamly available in [he permit area from
which [he request origjnutes.
(3) Upon request of a permitter in an adjoining sen~ice area when
. said perntittee does not have an ambulance immediately available in the
permit area from which a reyurst originates.
' ~ f4) To provide return ambulance servire to a Person that
- originally used prrmitree's service (or amhulance transportation to a
destination outside of permittee's service area.
31 .085 Application for a Permit •
or Renewal o(a Permit.
Prerequisite to Lssuance. ~ i
- (a) PROCEDURE AND INFORMATION REQUIRED. Applicants for
a permit or a renewal of a permit m:der this chapter shall file with the
Department an oppliralion in writing, on a form to hr famished by the
DrparhnenL which shall );vr the following information'.
L,t. -t?t~j¢tc. , ,,,,~~.~ .,, ,, f I) Name anJ description of applicanC
12) Btlsilrr$s address and residence address of record of the
applicant;
(31 Trade ar firm name, or D9A as recorded:
(4) It' a corpomlion, a joint venture or a partnership or limited
partnership. the names of all parhtcrs, or the names of corporate officers,
their permanent xddre+ses and (heir percentage of participation in the
business;
(51 A statement of Cents showing the ev pcrirnce of Ihr applicant
in the operation of an ambulance service and that the applicant is qualified
to render efficient amhulmlce service. A photocopy of the license issued by
the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol to privately owned
umbulanee companies tin accordance with Section '_501. Cali(omia Vehicle
Codrlshall be npprndc•d to the application:
(fit The gcoeraphical boundary of the territory (or which the
pcnnil is requesR•J .
(i 1 A sla le meet that the upplie;utt owns or has ender his content.
in gout medlanieal eunddion. required rquipntrnl to adequately conduct an
amhuluncr servlre in the territory fur which hr is applying. and that the •
:I IIplIC:1n1 UWllti nr has aell'$S t0 50IIUble facIIIIIPS for maintaining his
eyuipntent in a Clean and sanitary' condition;
'''~ ~*%~:"?;i;~:Y~~::+?'Gi !r]nrnsl
160.8
' ~~
AMBULANCES 31.086
Ig) A list. amended as cuyuirrd during the year for any changed,
,r., ~__ra~ •'v (y subs[i[uttd. loaned. or leased vehicles. diving a complete description of razh
-- ambulance vehidr opem[ed by the applicant, including the patient capacity
thereof. and a copy of the most recent Ambulance Inspection Report issued
by the Cali(omia Highway Patrol for each vehicle;
(91 An affirmation that each permitted ambulance and its
~.-- ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ -. ~:' appurtenances con(onn to all applicable provisions of this chapter. the
Calilomia Vehicle Code. and the California Administrative Code:
1101 A statement that the applicant employs sufficient personnel
adzyuatrly [rained to deliver ambulance sz rvices o(good quality at all times
in the applicant's proposed serricr area:
(I I) A list, amended as rcyuirrd during the year for any personnel
changes, giving a description of the training far each ambulance employee,
' ~ ~ ~ and a cope of eadt certificate or license issued by the State or County
establishing qualifications of such personnel in ambulance operations:
' 11'_1 .4 schedule of rates. including any special rates. to be charged
• by the permitter for ambulance services provided under this chapter;
f 131 A statrtnent that shows to the satisfaction of [hr Department
that Ilte issuance of a permit is in the public interest and there is' a need (or a
C permit to he issued, in that there is a requirement (or ambulance sen'ice
which can br legally served by the applicant;
' (111 A statement sigttrd by the applicant that as a condition of
the County issuing a permit. applicant agrees to appear and defend all
actions against the County arising out al the exercise of said permit. and
~~ shall mdrmnily and save the County. its officers, employees and agents
hannlest of and from all duims, demands', actions, or causes of actions of
every AinJ and Jrsrription resulting Aircctly or indirectly, arising out of, or
in any way connected with Ihr exercise of this permit.
1151 Such other facts or information as the Drpa rtment may
require.
i1.ORfi Inrestigalimt b}' Hrnlth Officer
Upon tliz n•n•ipt of a contplclyd application. the Health O(I'icer shall
conduct an u1vr51igulion Io Jclcrminr it Ihz public hmlth, sal'aty, well'an:,
ronrenience and nc•assily regmre the eranting ut an original or additional
permit liar Ilte unthulana• service area for which the application has been
made and shall liuther drtrnninz if the applicant meets all the rcyuirentents
of Uus cha plc r. l'pon completion of his investigation, Ihr liral[h OYl icrr
,hull rcmnvnrnd In Ihr Board of Supervisors that a pcrmil br grmtted or
\-- demod li+r the n¢lursn•d ambulance' service errs. No pcrmil shall be issued
by the Hzahlt Olliccr mail the Roar) o(Suprrvisnrs has Jelrrmined that the
public health. s:det y, wrll'arc, com~enience anJ necessity require the granting
ul such permit fur the purnailar ambulance service area.
r.5/(?~v..w=~~-a-y.: xu~~i I (+4r1 l r7nri7sl
.._. .. _ . _..___.. .. 1 arJ
31.087 HEALTH. SANITATION AND ANIMAL REGULA77ONS
31.087 Issuance or Denial of Permit.
- ~'~- (a) The Board of Supervisors may order [he issuance o(a permit [o
s"^•"^^'^m~°T•=~aa conduct an ambulance xrvice in a specified area upon finding that the public
health, safety, welfare, convenience and necessity require the availability 0(
such ambulance xrvices and that the applicant meets all requirements of this
chapter.
(bi The Board of Supervisors may order the denial of a permit on the
ground of infeasibility, Whenever a new application is filed under the
provisions of this chapter, for a permit to provide ambulance service in the
Cuunty where services already exist the Board after due investigation may
find anJ determine, as a matter of (act, [hat there does no[ exist in the area
su 1'ficient potential need (or ambulance service [o justify the gaming of an
adJi[ional separate and distinct permit for use within that ambulance xrvice
area. Predicated on such lindings, [he Board of Supervisors may deny the
application for permit on the gottnds that [he gan[ing of such new permit is
not economically or financially feasible and not in the public interest and
welfare.
(c) The Board of Supervisors may order the denial of a permit i( the
applicant or any partner, officer, or director [hereof:
(I) Was previously the holder of a permit issued under this
chapter which permit has been revoked or not reissue) and the teens or
conditions of the suspension have not been fulfilled or corrected:
(?) Is committing any act which, if committed by any permittee,
would be Bounds for the suspension or revocation of a permit issued
pursuant to this chapter:
~~~ (3) Has committed any art involving dishonesty, fraud or deceit
whereby another is injured or where the applicant has benefited;
(4) Has acted in the capacity o(a permitted person or firm under
this chapter without havinga permit therefor,
(5) Has entereJ a plea of guilty to, or been found guilty of, or
been convicted of. a felony, or a crime involving moral turpitude, and the
tlme (Or appeal Itas elapsed Or Ihr judgmrot 0(GOnvletl0n has br00 affirmed
on appe~h irrespective of an order greeting probation following such
ecnviction suspending the imposition of sentence, or o(a subsequent order
unJrr the provisions of Section L'D3.4 of the Penal CoJr allowing such
pcnon to withdraw his plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty, or
setting aside the plea or verdict of guilty, or dismissing the accusation of
inlormatinn.
IJ) BONDING OP APPLI('ANT. Before any permit is issued under
the provisions of this chapter. the Booed shall require the applicant as a
conJniun m the issuance ul' the permit to post wish the Clerk of the Board,
u cosh bond in the sum of two Thousand flee hundrcJ Dollars IS^_,5001 or a
surety hood in the saute amount ILnusheJ by a corporation authorinJ to do
busmass in the Slate of ('alilbnva, payable to the Cuunty of San Bernardino. •
' The bon) shall Ix conJitioncd upon the full and faithful performance by the
.•''='•%ti?x`%'iST,Y:.~Os:>+?^3 lrtirrns! 16010
. ... ~/'c
~_ -
AMBULANCES 31.088 - 31.089
C
permittre of his oblieations under the aPPBcable provisions of this chapter
and shall be kept in full force and effect by the permitter throughout the life
of the permit and all renewals Thereof. The Board of Supervisors, upon
recommendation of the Department, from time to time may by resolution
establish such additional or lower bond requirements for individual
• permittees az may be deemed necessary in the event it is determined the
. _ . foregoing bond requirements constitute insufficient or more than sufficient
protection to the County of San Bernardino, as [he caze may be. The bond
requirement may be waived by the Board of Supervisors if public need and
necessity require it (or nonprofit agencies supported by public subscription.
le) LIA8I LITY INSURANCE. The Permittee shall obtain and keep in
force during the term of said permit. public liability and bodily injury
insurance issued by a company authorized to do business in the S[atr of
' ~ ~ ~ California, insuring [he owner, and also naming the County as an additional
insured of such ambulance agtinst loss by reason of injury or damage that
may result to persons or property from negli¢ent operation or defective
• construction of Such ambulance. or from violation of this chapter or of any
other law of the State of California, or the United States. Said policy shall he
in the sum of not Irss than two hundred thousand dollars fS200.000) for
C personal injury to or death of any one person in any single accident: and the
limits of rush such vehicle shall not be less than one hundred thousand
' dollars fS100.000) for damages to or Justruction of property in any one
accident. lVorkeri Compensation Insurance shall be carried covering a8
employers of the penni[ holder. Be (ore the Health O(ficcr shall issue a
~~~~;~ permit copies of the policies, or certificates evidencing such policies. shall be
bled with the Department. All policies shall contain a provision requiring a
thirty 130) day notice to br given to the Department prior to cancellation,
modification or reduction in limits. Thr amounts of public liability insurance
for bodily injury and property damage shall be subject to review and
adjustment by Ihr Board annually at the Board's option.
31.08% Renewal of Permits.
Permits shall hr reneweJ annually by the Health Officer upon
application ol'thc permit tee, if lhr Hraltlt Olhcer detcnnittrs that the permit
holler has During the period of the expiring Permit opemtcJ in conformity
with the provisions of this chapter and the roles and regulations of the
Urparhnrnt, unJ that hr is capable of con liming operhtion in conformity
with the rules and regulations of Ihr Department.
31.089 Revmalinn of Permik.
"fir lir:dth Officer, alter rondurtin¢ a hearing shall be entpowercJ to
revok¢ the prnnrt issued under the provisions of this chapter to opvratr an
`ip;at:ia ;r .as<,d.Str::~t.,<:~ I60.1I lrz~rnel
R,..`~__ ._ ~ ~~
w
„~ 31.0810 HEALTH. SANITATION AND ANIMAL REGULATIONS
ambulance service, when it has been found after investigation that the
~ permittee or any partner, officer or Director:
_
_
_
(a) Violates any section of this chapter (or any rules or regulations
' that are promulgated by the Department) which relates to his permit
activities;
(b) Is convicted of any felony;
-. - - (c) Is convicted of any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude:
' (dl Is convicted of any offense relating to the use, sale, possession, or
transportation of narcotics or habit - lorming dnigs:
' (e) Commits any act involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit whereby
another is injured, or whereby the permittee has benefited, or any act
involving moral turpitude:
(f) Has misrepresented a material fact in obtaining a permit, or is no
' longer adhering [o [he conditions specified in his application;
' ~ ~ (g) Aids or abets an unlicensed or uncertificated person to evade the
~
~
~ provisions of this chapter:
.
(h) Fails to make and keep records showing his transactions as a
permittee, or fails [o have such records available for inspection by the Health •
Officer or his duly authorized representative for a period of not less than
three years after romplrtion of any transaction to which the records refer, ar
refuses to comply with a written request of the Health Officer to make such
record available I'or inspection:
fit Accepts an emergency call when either unable or unwilling to
provide the requested service or (ails [o inform the person requesting such
¢I¢hlt~~I~,,. ,,~, ,, .,n.r9gZJ service of any Delay and fails to obtain [he consent of such person before
causing an ambulance to respond from a location more distant than the one
to which the request was directed.
31.OS 10 Suspension, Conditional Operation
and Temporary Variance.
In the event of a change in ownrenhip of any kind or nature, any
interruption n( service of more than Twenty -four ('_41 hours duration, or
any substantial change in staffing or equipment of the ambulance service.
which causes the ambulance service to be rarrirJ out differently than
specified in the ..urrenl operating pe nniL the permitter shall notify the
Health OI'1'icer immedia[¢ly in writing, staling the (acts of such change.
Upon rcyurst by the permittee, the Health Olticer may gran[ a
Iempora ry variance From the condition sprcilieJ in the original permit if hr
linds that such change is in su hstantial compliance with the provisions of this
chapter. If the Hrulth Ofliccr finds that such rhunge is not in substantial
compli;mcr with thin rh;gner. hr II1Jy' SIISpCnd nr revoke lhr permit. In all
cases whin a change of ownenltip occurs in an umhulance service, an
application I'or a new permit shall tee IileJ with the Deportment within thirty •
130) day's. III no ease shall any temporary variance he valid for more than
sixty (GO) days without written approval of the Board of Supervisors.
I rs/Jrizs) I bP I '_
1~3
AMBULANCES 31.0811 - 31.0614
C
31.0811 Appeal to [he Board of Supervisors.
If the renewal of a permit be denied by the Health Office4 or if the
Health Officer suspends or revokes a permit, the permittee shall have the
rieht to demand a hearing by the Board of Supervisors. A request for a
hearing shall be made in writing to the Clerk of the Board within fifteen (I S)
calendar days Iollowing the denial, suspension, or revocation of the permit.
Upon receipt of a written request, the Clerk of the Board shall set the matter
1'or hearing on a date not more than silty (601 days following receipt of the
written request and give notice to the appellant and the Health Officer of [he
date set for the hearine. A[ the hearing. the Board shall hear the appellant,
the Hral[Ir Officer. and any other interested persons who may present
evidence relevant to [he derision of the Health Officer. Within thirty (30)
. , days following the conclusion of the hearing, the Board shall issue its order,
` ~ ~ ~ wlmther or not [he permit should be issued or the suspension or revocation
sustained,
. 31.081? Emergency Service Availability.
Each ambulance service operator shall provide emergency ambulance
C andlor AtIC ambulance srrvi ce on a continuous twenty - (our I?41 hours per
day bases, esdudme acts oY God or labor disputes. I( for any reason an
operator stops emergency ambulance andlor MIC ambulance service on a
continuous twenty -four (?41 hours per day basis, he shall immediately stop
any advertise mrnt of emergency services which have been discontinued.
31,0813 Communications.
Each ambulanre service operating in the unincorporated areas of the
County will establish and maintain radio contact with the County
(omlmmications Center and its local base of operation where technically
feasible. Procedures prescribed in the San Bernardino County Emergency
Medical Communications Systems Manual will be utilized 1'or use of the
radio.
31.0811 Standards for Dispatch
Each ambulance service operator receiving an emergency ambulance
request in its wrvrce area shall Dispatch an umhulanco immediately. If an
ambulance is not urailahle I'or immediate dispatch, the procedures identified
m Section 1106 0l ('haptrr'_. 'Title U. California Administrative Code.
Subehaplrr $, ArOdr I shall br com plieJ with. If the Jclay is unacceptable
Io the requester. tltr operator shall obtain dte Consent of the requester to
~~ fnr wart III$ rrllnl'S1 t0 an appropriate emergency response agency and shall
udsi,r the requester of the anticipated arrival time of the ahrrnate
a111hU:111C1.
'NiF?>if1GF.C:d~tga'`~~'~s?.bTa 16t luar~rel '
_..... ~
31.0815 - 31.0816 HEALTH, SANITATION AND ANIMAL REGULATIONS
31.0815 Ambulance Safety and Emergency Equipment.
Ambulances shall be maintained at all times in good mechanical repair
~a^°7 and in a clean and sanitary condition.
(a) MINIMUM EQUIPMENT. All ambulances shall be equipped with
all safety and emergency equipment required for ambulances by the
Califomia Vehicle Code and the California Administrative Code and
' - --~ administrative rules of the County Health Officer as the same are now
written or hereafter amended.
(b) MIC AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT. In addition to the regular
ambulance equipment and supplies, the MIC ambulances shall also be
equipped as required by administrative rules of the County Health Offcer.
(c) MAINTENANCE OF EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT AND
SUPPLIES. Dressings, bandagjng, instmments, and other medical supplies
used for care and treatment of patients will be protected so they are sterile
- ~ when ready for use. Provisions shall be made to assure autoclaving or
res[crilization of emergency equipment when required.
31.0816 Ambulance Personnel.
(a) Every person who operates an ambulance within the County of
San Bernardino while responding to emergency calls shall comply with [he
requirements in the Califomia Administrative Code for ambulance drivers.
The driver of an ambulance shall be trained and competent in the proper use
of all emergency equipment required by this chapter. The driver shall also
hold a certilicate as an Emergency Medical Technician IA (EhIT-IA), unless
t: ..., the ambulance service operator haz been specifically exempted from this
rcquiremem by the Board of Supervisors.
(bl AMDULANCE ATTENDANT. An ambulance attendant shall be at
least eighteen f I S) years of age, shall be IraineJ and competent in the proper
use of all emergency equipment required by this chapter, and shall hold the
required certification as an EMT-IA. If the vehicle is being used az a MIC
ambulance, at least one attendant shall hold a Certificate as a MIC paramedic
issued by the Health Officer.
fcl ATTENDANT REQUIRIi U. Each ambulance being operated
within the County of Sun 6emurdino in response loan emergency call shall
be shd(rd by both a Driver anJ an al trnd:mL unless the ambulance service
operator Ims been eaemptrd. The attendant of an ambulance responding to
an emergency call shall occupy the patient compar(ntenl while lransporling
any person in apparent need of medical attention.
An umhuhmcc driver nr amhulanec attendant who is a Califomia
licensed physician or a MIC nurse certified by the Sun Urmardino County
Health Officer shall hr rscmpt Irom the emergency medical training
nquirc Wren( ol'this xRwn.
This section shall not apply during any "Slate of war emergency;'
"state at emergency." or "local emergency" as delined in the Government
Cade of the State of Calil'ornio.
C
•
C
L
•
•:,r.:i^~t+irwiz~}•.:!,~~T ;z:..;:t~'*1 Iraar/rsl I ~ 16=
AMBULANCES 31.0817 - 31.0818
31.OA17 Ambulance Rates.
__ .
ta%knn~-„-o-_.c,.-.Y, No permittee shall charge more than the following rotes for ambulance
. .. .. service:
la) Onr patient: The schedule of maximum rates [hat may be charged
_ _ _ for ambuWnce service 1'or one patient shall be as set by Resolution adopted
..... ... by [he Board of Supervisors. Said rate xhedule is incorporated herein by
re&rcnce, and is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
as provided in paravaph (g) below.
Ibl Two or more patients:
f I 1 Each additional stretcher or gurney patient cartied at the
same time may br .barged the full basr rate for iesponse to the call and half
[he mileaer tale.
(?) Each additional sit-up patient shall be charged half the base
rate Yor response [o the cal! and hal(the mileage rate.
(cl For croup loads from the same origin to the same destination. the
Permittee shall divide [he total mileage rate equally among all the patients,
• and it all patients are siFUp patients, he shall also divide the total base rate
equally among Ihr patients.
C IJl No charge shall be made for uninjured or well persons wlto
accompany a paliun.
le) All ra trf arc to be computed from the time the ambulance arrives
for hire until the ambulance is discharged by the patient or his
rrprrsenmlivr, attenJing physician. or emergency receiving facility.
r Ifl A schedule of rates shall be posted in a conspicuous place within
'" ' ~ ' '" - rash ambulance.
(gl Thr schedule of maximum rates for ambulantt service shall be
subject to amendment by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. The Clerk
of the Board shall mail a copy of any such resolution adopted by the Board
to each pe mti flee unrt the new xhedulr ul'maximum rates shall be effective
thirty f30) days after ihr adoptiwt of the resolution by the Board of
Supervisors. Th ter U1 copies of the maximum rates as establixhed by
resolution shall hr on lile in rho oilier of Ilte Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
31.OAI8 Emergency and Disinter Operations.
Dunne any "slate of war emergency," "state of emergency " or
"local emergency." as Jelined in the Government CoJr of the State of
~- Ca hlimua. each umhulaner service operator shall proviJe equipment,
lacililirs. anti personnel as required by the Chief. Medical and Health
Srnicrs. whenes'rr the 1lydicul unJ Health Atmrx to the County Emergency
_~ Plan is arhs aced.
- -- -` ~~~ lrznm6l
_- - - ~
31.0819 - 31.0820 HEALTH. SANITATION AND ANIMAL RECUTATIONS
31.0814 Uur Complaints.
Any user or subscriber to an ambulance service contending that he has
~--,~ -- ---~~-~ -~~-- been rcquircJ [o pay an excessive charge for servtce or that he has receive
inadequate services may file a written complaint with the Department setting
_ forth such allegations. The Department shall notify the ambulance service of
~~ ~ ~ such complaint, and shall investigate the matter [o determine the validity of
'
_
the complaint. If [he complaint is drtertnined to be valid, the Depattment
shall take reasonable and proper actions to secure compliance with the
conditions of This chapter.
31.08'_0 Enforcement.
(a) The Deportment shall make all necessary and reasonable rules and
regulations subject to lhr approval of the Booed, covering ambulance service
operation, ambulance equipment, ambulance vehicles, ambulance personnel.
. ~, and for the effective and reasonable administration of [his chapter.
(b) The Department shall inspect the rrcords. facilities, vehicles,
eyuipmcnL anJ methods of operation, whenever such inspections are
deemed necessary. •
C
•
yf~fdiTiTgSijF:ir~ w=>ii?. (I]/JI/]6/ Ib~-~ •q~7
~,~~~
CITY OF RAI~1-10 Cl'CA~140NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 4, 1981
T0: City Council and Ci [y Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, Li ty Engineer ~,^LVy'r'
SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds
Parcel Map 4804 - located on the south side of 9th Street at Lion
OWNER: Daniel J. Salter b Michael Todd \
1054 5. RoberCSOn Blvd., Suice 202
Los Angeles, California 90035
Performance Bond (Road) $40,000
The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved
plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements.
Tract 9403 - located north of Highland Avenue and east of Mayberry Avenue
OWNER: Olympus Pacific Corp.
2110 Ka[el la Avenue
Anaheim, California 92803
Faithful Performance Bond (Water) 41,000
Faithful Performance Bond (Sewer) 13,000 F
Cash Staking Bond 2,350
Certification from J,P. Kapp, Engineer, indicates that all final monuments have
been set and he has been paid in full.
Tract 9423 located on the West side of Beryl South of Base Line
OWNER: Coral Investment Inc.
540 S. Pasadena Avenue
Glendora, California 91740
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $137,500 ' ~'fn ,
continued...
13
Staff Report - Release of Bonds
February 4, 1981
Page 2
Tract 9480 -located South of Base Line, West of Turner
OWNER: Ken[ Land Co.
17881 Sky Park North
Irvine, California 92714
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $126,000
Faithful Performance Bond (Water) 42,000
Faithful Performance Bond (Sewer) 61,000
Tract 9521 - located on the Wes[ side of Archibald North of Hillside
OWNER: Lewis Homes of California
P. 0. Box 670
Upland, California 91786
Faithful Performance Bond (Landscaping) $78,000
The landscaping and irrigation system have been constructed in accordance
with approved plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept said
improvements.
a~,
February 4, 1.981
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINDTES
Regular Mee ring
1. CALL TO ORDER
'the regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Communi [y
Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, February 4, 1981.
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who
led in Che flag salute.
Present: Council members Sames C. Frost, Son D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo,
Arthur H. eridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Sames
Robinson; Oepu[y City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Cotmnuni[y Development Director,
Jack Lam; City Planner, Rarry Hogan; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Finance Director,
Harry Empey; and Cotmmunity Services Director, William Holley.
Approval of Minutes: Councilman Mike 15 requested the last sentence on page 1
of the January 7 Minutes br stricken. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by
Palombo to approve the corrected minutes of January 7, 1981 and the Minutes of
January 21, 1981. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
2. A.NNOWCEMENTS.
a. Mayor Schlosser announced that [here would be a hearing by the Planning
Commission on the Victoria project on Thursday, February 5, a[ 7:00 p.m. in the
Lion's Park Consnunity Center.
b. Councilman Mikels reported Chat [he Omnitrans Board, which met earlier in the
day, cook action to Increase the fares by about fifteen cents. Action with re-
spect to the reduction of service or elimination of routes was deferred. He
suggested Chac the staff take a look a[ how the proposed routes in terms of annual
cost savings that would be calculated based on the routes eliminated is going to
effect our contribution to the Omnitrans system.
c. Councilman Bridge reported on a recent join[ meeting of the County Super-
visors Association and the League of California Cities Ln San Francisco which
employment and personnel problems were discussed. He said the most beneficial
discussion was led by Scale Senator Russell from San Fernando Valley on retire-
ment - Sn particular retirement abuses. Senator Russell staled that the PERS
program was [he one that was properly funded and administered. Mr. Bridge said
he was happy to announce that the City, Cucamonga County Water District, and [he
Foothill Fire District were under the PERS program.
Councilman Bridge also elaborated on one of the goals of the Tri-Community
Incorporation Cortsnittee which was to make it easier for people of [he community
to par ticipa to in local government. He said since £ncorporatlon, we have done
a good job in getting participation and Snvo lvement in the local conanuni[y. He
said he fe lr we had met the goal of the Incorporation Committee.
d. Sim Robinson announced that the next Advisory Commission meeting would be
February 19. This was a change from the regular time so the Commissioners could
be present at the Vic tori Public Hearing which was scheduled on eheir regular
meeting night.
e. Councilman Frost announced there would be a California Transportation Com-
mision !tearing in Sacramento on Tuesday, February 10, 1981. He was wondering
iE the City would }rave a representative a[ that hearing. Councilman `tike is recom-
mended that Jim Frost represent the City a[ the hearing. Council concurred with
the recommendation.
City Council Minutes
February G, 1981
Page 2
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
Mike is stated that he wished Co abs Gain on item "h" of the ConaenC Calendar.
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 81-2-4 for $36,183.04.
b. Alcoholic Heve rage License Eor the Southland Corp., Shelly Axelrod, 7-11
Market, 9464 Base Line, transfer license, off-sale beer and wine.
c. Alcoholic Beverage License for Socorro's, Clifford J. and Socorro M.
Solorzano, for on-sale beer and wine for bona fide public eating place,
10276 Foothill Boulevard.
d. Refer claim by Gary C. Christy to [he Ci[y Attorney For handling.
e. Request From Sheriff's Department for recognition of Reserve Officers'
Dedication. It is recommended Chet $300 be appropriated from the contin-
gency fund to pay for the January 24, 1981 Installation Dinner for the
Reserve Unit.
f. Request from Sheriff's Department. A request to construct counter and shelves
for the reception area and to aware the Lid to Jahn Vonk. I[ is recommended
chat $500.00 be transferred from the contingency fund for this project.
g. Release of Bonds:
Parcel Mao 4804: located on Che south side of 9th Street at Lion. Owner:
Daniel J. Salter b Michael Todd.
Performance Bond (road) $40,000
Tract 9403: located north of Highland Avenue and east of Mayberry Avenue.
Ownet: Olympus Pacific Corp.
Faithful Performance Bond (water) $41,000
Faithful Performance Bond (sewer) 13,000
Cash Slaking Bond 2,350
Tract 9423: located on the weae aide of Beryl, south of Base Line. Owner:
Coral Investment Inc.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $137,500
Tract 9480: located south of Base Line, weal of Turner. Owner: Rent Land
Company.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $151,200
Faithful Performance Bond (water) 42,000
Faithful Performance Bond (sewer) 61,000
Tract 9521: located on the west aide of Archibald, north of Nills ide. Owner:
Lewis Homes of California.
Faithful Performance Bond (landscaping) S 78,000
City Council 9lnutes
Feb ruazy 4, 1981
Page 3
h. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6011, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Securf t~:.
Recommendation: IC is recommended that City Council adopt the reso lotion
;,c ce piing Parcel Map 6011, improvement agreement, and improvement security.
RESOLUTION N0. 81-17
A RESOLL'TIOY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEI.
y1P NUMBER 6011, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 6011),
1:~ROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
i. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6585 and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement.
Recommendation: IC is recommended chat City Council adopt a resolution approvi:'
Parcel Nap 6585 and accept Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agree-
ment for the sidewalk on Milliken.
RESOLUTION N0. 81-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COIRICIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 6585, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6585)
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONT. ACT, AND LIEN
AGREEMENT.
j. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for
8623 Etiwanda (D.R. 80-23)
Rerommenda[ion: It is recommended [ha[ the City Council accept Said
Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk [o sign the same and direct the Ciey Clerk Co record
[he same.
RESOLUTION N0. B1-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREE-
MENT FROM JOE T. GUIDERA, JR. AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME.
Councilman Frost requested clarification of the Alcoholic Beverage License
application for Southland Corporation. He said Ques Cion 10 which asked iE they
had ever vioiated any of the provisions of Che Alcoholic Beverage Control Act or
regulations, and to explain. Mr. Wasserman said Chat Che Corporation as a whole
had been in violation for selling liquor to a minor. However, [he local store
requesting the application had not.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Frost [o approve the Conaene Calendar.
Motion carried unanimously S-0, except for item "h" with Councilman Mikels
abstaining.
4, CITY COUNCIL f.ON5 SDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA
FINe1NCI,1L TASK FORCE. Jim Robinson presented the staff report.
After considerable discussion, Council directed staff [o consider the
Task Force recommendation -
a. ey looking at various alternatives to evaluate and pursue grants
either by employees and/or consultants.
.+. 8y considering the establishment of a Redeye lopmen[ Agency.
Council concurred [ha[ the recortmiendations from the Financ cal Task Force should
be ongoing.
C1[y Council Minutes
February 4, 1981
Page 4
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
SA. ZONE CHANGE IJO. 80-13 - NUBANK. A zone change from A-P (administrative-
professional) to R-3 (multi-Family residential) for 6.4 acres generally located
south of Base Line an [he west aide of Hellman - APN 208-011-02, 03, and 04.
Deputy City Clerk Beverly Authelet read title of Ordinance No. 133.
ORDINANCE NO. 133 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208-011-02, 03, AND
04 FROM A-P TO R-3 LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE
ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost to approve and adopt Ordinance No. 133.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, Schlosser.
NOES: Palombo. ABSENT: None.
5B. ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-16 - LANDMARK. A zone change from A-1 (limited agricul-
tural) to R-1 (single family residential) for 1.65 acres located on the west side of
Turner Avenue ac Ironwood Street (related item: TT11577) - APN 1077-041-58.
Jack Lam presented [he staff report.
Deputy Cicy Clerk Authelet read title of Ordinance No. 134.
ORDINANCE N0. 134 (second reeding)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE20NING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUFIDER 1077-041-58 PROM A-1
TO R-1 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE
AT IRONWOOD STREET.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting For public hearing. There being no response, [he
hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels. seconded by Fro at to approve and adopt Ordinance No. 134.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Prost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and
Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
SC. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE N0. 105, RELATING TO PARR DEDICATIONS IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS,
AND A SUPPORTING RESOLllTION TO THAT AMENDMENT.
Mr. Wasserman recommended that the item be continued to the February 18 Ci[y Council
mee trng.
Mayor Schlosser asked the audience if anyone had come just for this item. There
was no response.
Council concurred [o continue [he item to February 18, 1981.
City Council Minutes
February 4, 1981
Page 5
SD_E.WIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ZON£ CHANCE NO. 80-1G - RUBERTS GROUP. A change of
zone from R-1-8500 (single family residential) Co R-3 (multiple family residential)
for 7.1 acres, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue -
APN :02-17-010. Staff report by Sack Lam.
Ciey Clerk Wasserman read Cit le of Ordinance No, 136.
ORDINANCE N0. 136 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202-17-010 LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND
HERMOSA AVENUE FROM R-1-8500 TO R-3.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing.
Addressing Council in opposition to the higher density project were:
Jim Kulebacki, 6739 Teak Way
Jim Banks, Etiwanda
Ms. Toni Kasada, representing the Roberts Group, was present to answer any
questions of the Council.
Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing.
After some Council discussion, Mayor Schlosser set February 18 for second reading
of Ordinance No. 136.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
6A. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN REVISION. At [he request of Councilman
Mikels, the proposed adoption of the amendments to the San Bernardino County Solid
Waste Management Master Plan was deferred. Since [he last City Council meeting,
staff had requested that County staff contact Councilman Mikels [o deal with his
specific questions.
Mr. Gene Zdunowski from the County Solid Waste Management Division was present
and briefly outlined the Master Plan and responded to questions from the Council.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to send the document to the Ci[y
Attorney Eor an analysis, and to request staff to bring back a proposal to Council
in [he near future with respect to regulating toxic and hazardous waste -- the
storage, transfer, and disposal of such. Motion included to defer any action on
Resolution No. 81-6 until after the analysis was completed by the City Attorney.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
sermon.
S[a Ff report by Lauren
Motion: Councilman Mikels recommended James Frost as the delegate and Michael
Pa Lomho as the alternate. Council concurred with the recommendation.
6C. ,~MBCLA.NCE DE-REGULATION. S[aEf report by Lauren Wasserman.
There has been some discussion in [he Weet End of San Bernardino County relative
[o de-regulating [he ambulance Sndust ry. At the present time, ambulance services
were governed either by a County Ordinance or controlled directly by each city.
In addition [o es[ab llshing guidelines for minimum levels of service, cities have
become involved in [he regulation of fees and charge9 for ambulance services.
Staff was req uescing direction .`ram the Council concerning how to handle the
City Council Minutes
February 4, 1981
Page 6
StaFE was requesting direction from the Council concerning how to handle the
ambulance services in Rancho Cucamonga.
Mayor Sch:osser opened the meeting far public hearing.
Addressing Council were:
Don Reid, a paramedic for Trans-Medical Services. He addressed the
point that each ambulance service had semi-annual inspections which
were conducted by the Stale. This assured Chat all equipment was in
good working order, adequate medical supplies were available, the
safety of the vehicles was checked, and the qualifications of the
personnel were checked by both the Stale and County.
Betty McKay told of an experience where someone was taken approximately
one mile by ambulance to the local hospital and the cost was $125. She
felt chis was excessive and should be looked into.
Bob Lee, ChieF of the Foothill Fire District, said there was presently
only one ambuaance company in town. The Fire District had an excellent
working relationship with them. Ne stated that no ambulance service would
remain in town long unless it had the support from the local file depart-
ment. To receive such support would depend on how quickly [hey could
respond [o calls, quality of service, and other such things.
John Lyon asked Council that if we de-regulate and a company came in
town that was not qualified, monitored the calls 6y the Fire Department,
arrived first at an accident and started to transfer a victim before the
paramedics arrived, would we not have a worse problem?
There being no further public comments, the Mayor closed the public portion of
the meeting.
Mo [ion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo Co try de-regulation of ambulance
services, and for staff to keep Council informed with a quarterly report. Moti~;n
carried unanimously 5-0.
City Clerk Wasserman read ehe title of Ordinance No. 137.
ORDINANCE NO. 137 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER
8 OF DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 3 OF THE SAN HERNARDINO
COUNTY CODE IN ORDER TO DE-REGULATE AMBULANCES.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palom to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0-
Mayor Schlosser sec February 18, 1981 for second reading of Ordinance No. 137.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
City Council Minutes
February 4, 1981
Page 7
B. ADDITIONAL ITEMS.
a. Mayor Schlosser presented two requests for Proclamations: one by the
Ar thrlcis Foundation and ehe second by the American Cancer 8ocie tv. Notion:
Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to authorize the Mayor to sign [he two
proclamations. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
b. Mayor Schlosser announced [hat the Prime Minister of Tonga would be in
the City on Monday, February 16, at the King of Glory Church. He suggested
that Council should do something to welcome him to the community. Motion:
Moved by ;tikels, seconded by Frost to have staff prepare a Proclamaf ion for
the occasion. Motion carried unanimously 5-D.
c. Sohn Lyons reported to Council that on Monday, February 2, the Planning
Commission had a general plan hearing. He stated concern that Che Planning
Commission was not listening to the citizens.
Nancy Swaithes also spoke regarding the unfairness of the Planning Commission in
not listening [o the concerns of the citizens especially on issues of density.
Mayor Schlosser slated that the General Plan was going through hearings with
the Planning Conunission now. However, in just a Eew weeks it would be coming
to the City Council for final decisions. It was the City Council chat made the
final decision.
9. ADJCURNEMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn to
an Executive Session regarding some pending litigation, no[ to reconvene. The
meeting adj ourned a[ 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__ .. .~~i,~...r
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk